St. Helena City Council
June 25, 2024

City of St. Helena
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, June 25, 2024 @ 6:00 PM
Vintage Hall Board Room - Second Floor
465 Main Street, St. Helena

PLEASE NOTE: Any person who wishes to speak regarding an item on the agenda or make a comment under the "Oral Communication" portion of the agenda may do so, but please observe the time limit of four minutes. The Mayor may reduce the four minute time limit for all speakers in circumstances where a large number of citizens intend to make public comment.

Public comment for meetings will be accepted via email to [email protected]. All public comments must be received three hours prior to the meeting. All other public comments received after the deadline will be attached to the item the next business day or soon thereafter. Public comments will not be read out loud but will be publicly available and attached to the on-line agenda.

The schedule of upcoming meetings and published meeting agendas can be found on the City of St. Helena website at https://sthelena.civicweb.net/portal/.

Page

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL
Mayor: Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall:, City Council Members: Anna Chouteau, Patrick Kenealy, Billy Summers

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

5. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Estimated start time: 6:05 p.m.

5.1. Consideration and proposed approval of Regular Meeting Minutes of May 28, 2024 and June 11, 2024.
05-28-2024 Regular City Council - Minutes
06-11-2024 Regular City Council - Minutes
9 - 29

6. PUBLIC FORUM:

Members of the public are entitled to speak on matters of municipal concern not on the agenda during Public Forum. Each person’s comments shall be limited to 4 minutes. Each person is entitled to speak on any non-agendized item only once at any meeting. Brief questions by Council Members for clarifications may be posed and answered, and Council Members may make requests that items be placed on future agendas, but in accordance with state law, no substantive discussion or action may take place unless and until the matter properly appears on the agenda.

Estimated start time: 6:10 p.m.

7. REPORTS BY STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, AND AB 1234 REPORTS:

Reports by staff and/or Council Members on items of general interest. Brief questions for clarification may be posed and answered, and Council Members may request that items be placed on a future agenda. Except under certain circumstances, the Brown Act prohibits any other discussion or action by the City Council.

Estimated start time: 6:20 p.m.

8. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC RECOGNITIONS
None

9. STAFF BRIEFING
None

10. CONSENT ITEMS
Members of the Council or the public (present at the meeting) may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of considering alternative action, for extended discussion, or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions. (Roll Call Vote) Estimated start time: 6:25 p.m.

10.1. Consideration and proposed adoption of a Resolution approving the plans for the C22-03 Jacob Meily Park Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation Project and authorizing the advertisement for bids.

CEQA Determination: Class I Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 of CEQA
Prepared By: Mario Traverso, Project Manager
Recommendation:

Adopt the attached resolution and authorize staff to solicit proposals for the C22-03 Jacob Meily Park Drainage Site Survey and Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation Project.

Staff Report - Pdf
31 - 40

10.2. Consideration of Resolution adding a portion of McCorkle Avenue to the City’s List of Red Zones (parking prohibitions) and rescinding Resolution 2023-71
CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Jose Calderon, Engineering Technician II
Recommendation:

Approve Resolution adding portion of McCorkle Avenue to the City’s List of Red Zones (parking prohibitions) and rescinding Resolution 2023-71.

Staff Report - Pdf
41 - 61

10.3. Consideration and Proposed Approval of a Resolution Extending the Waiving of Sign Fees for Businesses
63 - 66

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Maya DeRosa, Community Development Director Recommendation:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf

10.4. Consideration and Proposed Adoption of a Resolution Adopting a list of Projects for Fiscal Year 2024-25 funded by SB1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf
67 - 71

10.5. Adopt Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Telstar for control system integration and SCADA automation upgrades for the Water Treatment Plant as part of CIP Project Number W18-113 for a not to exceed contract of $206,889 and authorize the Public Works Director to approve up to 10% contingency.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Deputy City Manager
Recommendation:

Approve the attached Resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf
73 - 83

10.6. Approval of a Resolution approving and authorization to purchase SMART Advanced Meter Infrastructure from Badger Meter, Inc. to replace all existing utility meter infrastructure for a not to exceed cost of $1,056,966.44 as budgeted for CIP Project W24-04 Smart Meter Deployment.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Deputy City Manager
Recommendation:

Approve the attached Resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf
85 - 94

10.7. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing Bid Advertisement for CIP Project W24-04 SMART Meter Deployment.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Deputy City Manager
Recommendation:

Adopt the attached Resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf
95 - 100

10.8. Approval of a Resolution authorizing Amendment No. 7 to STH Contract: FY2021-048 in the amount of $140,000 with Operational Technical Services for a total amount not-to-exceed of $3,584,005 for 101 - 107

temporary Water Treatment Plant operators.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Deputy City Manager
Recommendation:

Adopt the attached Resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS

11.1. Introduction and first reading of an Ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 2024-001) to amend Chapter 17.30 of Title 17 of the St. Helena Municipal Code regarding the calculation of housing in-lieu fees.

Estimated start time: 6:45 p.m.

CEQA Determination: Exempt from the requirements of CEQA under the “General Rule”, Section 15061 (b)(3), in that it can be seen with certainty that the proposed action will have no impact on the environment.

Prepared By: Maya DeRosa, Community Development Director Recommendation:

Introduction and waive the first reading of the proposed Ordinance to:

1. Find that the proposed changes to Chapter 17.30 of the Zoning Code are exempt from CEQA Guideline 15061
(b)(3); and

2. Approve and adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA
2024-001) to amend Chapter 17.30 of Title 17 of the St.

Helena Municipal Code regarding the calculation of
housing in-lieu fees.

Staff Report - Pdf
109 - 113

11.2. Approval of Resolutions adopting updates to the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees and Nonresidential/Commercial Linkage Fees.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director Recommendation:

Adopting updates to the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees and Nonresidential/Commercial Linkage Fees.

Staff Report - Pdf
Public Comment.Mary Stephenson
Public Comment.Steve Goldfarb
115 - 206

12. OLD BUSINESS

12.1. Receive 9212 Report for the Noble House Project and either: (1) Adopt the St. Helena Agritourism Initiative measure, without alteration or (2) Pass a Resolution Submitting the Noble House St. Helena Agritourism Initiative to the voters for consideration at the November 5, 2024 207 - 541

Election.

Estimated start time: 7:05 p.m.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: April Mitts, Assistant City Manager
Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution to either: (1) adopt the measure, without alteration or (2) submit the measure to the voters.

Staff Report - Pdf
Presentation
Public Comment. Tom Belt
Public Comment.Pat Dell
Public Comment.Alan Galbraith
Public Comment.John Galasso
Public Comment.Les Breckenridge
Public Comment.Marc Mondavi and Peter Mondavi Jr.

Public Comment.Nancy Parrish Brandl
Public Comment.Tim Hall
Public Comment.Christine Sekino
Public Comment.Susan Kenward
Public Comment.Grace Kistner
Public Comment.Dot Varland
Public Comment.Leslie Stanton
Public Comment.Water Audit California

13. NEW BUSINESS

13.1. Approval of a resolution appointing applicants to the Active Transportation & Sustainability Committee, Active Transportation Sustainability Committee to NVTA, Parks and Recreation Commission, Library Board of Trustees and Planning Commission and consider leaving the recruitment open for the unfilled terms of office until filled.

Estimated start time: 7:45 p.m.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
Recommendation:

Staff recommends adopting a resolution appointing applicants to the following committees:

Active Transportation Sustainability Committee to NVTA
Active Transportation Sustainability Committee
Library Board of Trustees
Parks & Recreation Committee
Planning Commission
543 - 607

Staff Report - Pdf
Public Comment.Pat Dell
Public Comment.Oliver Caldwell
Public Comment.Jim Anderson

13.2. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Helena, State of California, Calling and Giving Notice of a General Municipal Election and consider Ballot Measures A1, A2 and B to be Held on Tuesday, November 5, 2024; Requesting the Consolidation by the Napa County Supervisors for the Statewide General Election and that Napa County Provide Election Services with full Reimbursement by the City of St. Helena
Estimated start time: 8:00 p.m.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
Recommendation:

Approve the resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf
609 - 615

13.3. Consideration and adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Helena authorizing payment of $330,000 to Pacific Gas & Electric Company for services rendered related to the realignment of overhead power lines associated with the Farmstead Development Project and authorize the City Manager to enter into a supplemental agreement with Long Meadow Ranch for reimbursement.

Estimated start time: 8:10 p.m.

CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Eric Janzen, Assistant Public Works Director Recommendation:

Adopt the attached Resolution.

Staff Report - Pdf
617 - 623

14. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:

14.1. A. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - Executive Board B. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - General Assembly C. Napa Valley Tourism Corporation (Umbrella for Napa County) D. League of California Cities – North Bay Division
E. Napa County City Selection Committee
F. Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District G. Youth Opportunities Commission

H. Napa County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) I. Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA)
J. Napa County Watershed Information Center & Conservancy (WICC) K. Upper Valley Waste Management Agency
L. Napa County Groundwater Sustainability Plan Advisory Committee M. Napa County Regional Climate Action Committee
N. Council Ad Hoc and Standing Committee Reports

15. ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular City Council meeting is scheduled for July 23, 2024, at 6:00 p.m.

This agenda was posted at City Hall, 1088 College Avenue, and at Vintage Hall, 465 Main Street, St. Helena, California on 25 Jun 2024.

Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s Office (707) 967-2792. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

CHALLENGING DECISIONS OF CITY ENTITIES
The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City of St. Helena is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision, including without limitation Government Code section 65009 applicable to many land use and zoning decisions, Government Code section 66499.37 applicable to the Subdivision Map Act, and Public Resources Code section 21167 applicable to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. Government Code section 65009 and 66499.37, and Public Resources Code section 21167, impose shorter limitations periods and requirements, including timely service in addition to filing.

If a person wishes to challenge the above actions in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting

described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of St. Helena, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL RECEIVED AFTER THE POSTING OF THE AGENDA
Any supplemental writings or documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the City Clerk’s Office located at 1088 College Avenue, St. Helena, California, during normal business hours and by appointment. In addition, such writings or documents will be made available on the City’s web site at https://sthelena.civicweb.net and will be available for public review at the respective meeting.

MINUTES
City of St. Helena
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, May 28, 2024 @ 6:00 PM
Vintage Hall Board Room - Second Floor
465 Main Street, St. Helena
A complete video recording of this meeting, except for closed session, can be found at https://sthelena.civicweb.net/Portal/ or by calling the City Clerk at (707) 968-2742. The City Council video is the official record of the Council meeting.

Present: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers

Absent: None

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

4.1 Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to adopt the agenda. The motion was seconded by Council Member Patrick Kenealy and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

5. JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND FINANCING AUTHORITY NEW BUSINESS:

The St. Helena City Council will now convene the meeting as a joint meeting of the City Council and Financing Authority.

Estimated start time: 6:05 p.m.

5.1 City Council Resolution approving: (1) installment sale financing to provide financing of water system improvements, and (2) financing documents and related official actions.

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
St. Helena Financing Authority Resolution approving: (1) installment sale financing to provide financing of water system improvements, and (2) financing documents and related official actions.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.

Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director introduced the item and Ken Dieker, Municipal Financial Advisor reported on the item.

No public comment was received.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to adopt a resolution approving the installment sale financing to provide financing of water system improvements. The motion was seconded by Council Member Anna Chouteau and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
Council Member Anna Chouteau moved to adopt a resolution approving the financing documents and related official actions. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Eric Hall and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

6. The joint St. Helena City Council and Financing Authority will now convene the meeting as a regular City Council meeting.

7. ADOPTION OF MINUTES

7.1 Consideration and proposed approval of Regular Meeting Minutes of May 14, Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
2024.

Recommendation:

No public comment was received.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to adopt the agenda as presented. The motion was seconded by Council Member Patrick Kenealy and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

8. PUBLIC FORUM:

No public comment was received.

9. REPORTS BY STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, and AB 1234 REPORTS:

9.1 Update on Pedestrian Improvements for Intersection of Kearney Street and Madrona Avenue per Active Transportation & Sustainability Committee engagement on 5/22/24.

CEQA Determination: Categorically Exempt, Section 15323 Prepared By: Joseph Leach, Public Works Director and City Engineer Ethan Walsh, City Attorney noted there was no reportable action from the May 28, 2024 special City Council closed session meeting.

Reports were made by staff.

10. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC RECOGNITIONS

10.1 Proclamation recognizing Gun Violence Awareness Day and Month

10.2 Proclamation recognizing LGBTQ + Pride Month

11. STAFF BRIEFING
None

12. CONSENT ITEMS
Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
Members of the Council or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of considering alternative action, for extended discussion, or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions. (Roll Call Vote)

12.1 Item 12.1 was pulled from consent.

Approve a resolution: (1) establishing Capital Improvement Project W24-11 Bell Canyon Dam DSOD Analysis/Improvements with a budget of $860,000; (2) allocating $860,000 from the 2024 Water Bonds Issuance; (3) authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Haley Aldrich Inc for engineering and project management services to provide a high-quality geotechnical exploration of Bell Canyon Dam for a not-to-exceed total of $781,900; and (4) authorize the Public Works Director to approve amendments to the Agreement to increase the not-to-exceed amount by up to 10% of the original PSA amount.

12.2 Item 12.2 was pulled from consent.

Authorization to pay invoices from Aaction Rent for a cost not-to-exceed $70,323 for emergency pump rentals at the Wastewater Treatment Plant for high flow events due to extended rain season.

12.3 Consideration and adoption of a resolution authorizing Amendment #1 to Professional Services Agreement (PSA) FY2021-049 with Housing Element consultant Mintier Harnish related to City Council direction to explore alternative sites, units or other options for replacing Housing Element Opportunity Site #10 for an additional $25,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $253,024.

CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Aaron Hecock, Senior Planner
Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution.

12.4 Approval of a resolution authorizing the purchase of two 8-inch trailer mounted pumps for a total cost of $237,935.80 from Holland Pump to assist with prevention of sanitary sewer overflows and other potential flooding events.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
Recommendation:

Approve the attached resolution authorizing the purchase.

12.5 Review of the 2023 St. Helena Annual Housing Element Progress Report (APR).

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Aaron Hecock, Senior Planner
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council review, consider, and file this report recognizing that staff submitted the information to HCD and OPR in keeping with the April 1, 2024 mandate.

12.6 Item 12.6 was pulled from consent.

Authorize the purchase of capital equipment for a US Jetter 4018-300 Trailer Mounted High Pressure Jetting Unit from WECO Industries LLC for a total cost not-to-exceed $72,831.00

12.7 Consideration and proposed approval of a resolution authorizing a ceremonial flag recognizing LGBTQ+ Pride Month during the month of June 2024.

CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Andrew Bradley, Program Manager
Recommendation:

Approve a resolution authorizing the Progress Pride flag to be flown on the City's ceremonial flag pole during the month of June 2024.

12.8 Consideration and adoption of a Resolution: (1) Awarding the R24-79 Pavement Restoration Project to Argonaut Constructors in the amount of $2,197,939.77; (2) Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Construction Contract with Argonaut Constructors; (3) Requesting a budget increase for project R24-79 of $1,315,233.75; (4) Authorizing budget transfer from Measure T fund balance; (5) Authorizing the Director of Public Works to approve Change Orders not to exceed 10% of the contract amount; and (6) Determining the project to be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

CEQA Determination: Class I Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 of CEQA
Prepared By: Mario Traverso, Project Manager
Recommendation:

Approve the Resolution

12.9 Approving request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of the fiscal year FY-2024 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian / Bicycle project funding.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Jose Calderon, Engineering Technician II
Recommendation:

Approve the Resolution.

12.10 April 2024 Review and Forecasting of City Water Supply Availability.

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Ian Dale, Environmental Services Tech
Recommendation:

Receive and file.

12.11 Item 12.11 was pulled from consent.

Consideration and Proposed Approval of a Contract to Godbe Research for a Community Survey in an amount not-to-exceed $32,375
Council Member Anna Chouteau moved to approve items 12.3 through 12.5 and 12.7 through 12.10. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Eric Hall and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

12.1 Approve a resolution: (1) establishing Capital Improvement Project W24-11 Bell Canyon Dam DSOD Analysis/Improvements with a budget of $860,000; (2) allocating $860,000 from the 2024 Water Bonds Issuance; (3) authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Haley Aldrich Inc for engineering and project management services to provide a high-quality geotechnical exploration of Bell Canyon Dam for a not-to-exceed total of $781,900; and (4) authorize the Public Works Director to approve amendments to the Agreement to increase the not-to-exceed amount by up to 10% of the original PSA amount.

CEQA Determination: Categorically Exempt, Section 15323 Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
Recommendation:

Approve the attached Resolution.

No public Comment was received.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve item 12.1. The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

12.2 Authorization to pay invoices from Aaction Rent for a cost not-to-exceed $70,323 for emergency pump rentals at the Wastewater Treatment Plant for high flow events due to extended rain season.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
Recommendation:

Authorization to issue payment for pump rentals needed for inflow & influent (I&I) and Sanitary Sewer overflow (SSO) mitigation.

No public comment was received.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve item 12.2. The motion was seconded by Council Member Anna Chouteau and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

12.6 Authorize the purchase of capital equipment for a US Jetter 4018-300 Trailer Mounted High Pressure Jetting Unit from WECO Industries LLC for a total cost not-to-exceed $72,831.00
CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
Recommendation:

Authorize the purchase of the equipment.

No public comment was received.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve as amended to not exceed $175,000.

The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

12.11 Consideration and Proposed Approval of a Contract to Godbe Research for a Community Survey in an amount not-to-exceed $32,375
CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Andrew Bradley, Program Manager
Recommendation:

Approve the attached resolution.

No public comment was received.

Council Member Patrick Kenealy moved to approve item 12.11. The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None

14. OLD BUSINESS

14.1 Consideration and proposed approval of a resolution directing staff to prepare a report to the City Council pursuant to California Elections Code Section 9212 analyzing the impacts and effects of the Noble House proposal titled, "St.

Helena Agritourism Initiative."
CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: April Mitts, Assistant City Manager
Recommendation:

Direct City staff to prepare a report on the proposed initiative analyzing the Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
impacts enumerated in Elections Code Section 9212 and return to Council with the report at the June 25 Council meeting.

April Mitts, Asst. City Manager reported on the item.

Kevin Teague, Chrissy Raymon and Christine Hail addressed the City Council.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve the staff’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
Mayor Dohring called for a ten minute recess.

15. NEW BUSINESS

15.1 Consider and Adopt a Resolution Identifying Sidewalk Segments for which Maintenance is the Responsibility of the City of St. Helena.

CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Eric Janzen, Assistant Public Works Director Recommendation:

Approve the attached resolution.

Joe Leach, Public Works Director reported on the item.

Anthony Micheli addressed the City Council.

Council Member Anna Chouteau moved to approve the staff’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024

15.2 Presentation of analysis for the updated Cost Allocation Plan to allocate personnel costs to various funds as appropriate including Water and Wastewater funds.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Yosselyn Valencia, Finance Manager
Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.

Yosselyn Valencia, Finance Manager reported on this item.

No public comment was received.

Council Member Patrick Kenealy moved to approve the staff’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Eric Hall and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
Council Member Anna Chouteau moved to continue the meeting beyond 9:00 pm. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Eric Hall and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

15.3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 and 2024-25 Mid-Cycle Budget Report and Consideration of a Resolution Approving Mid-Cycle Budget Adjustments for FY 2024-25.

Estimated start time: 8:05 p.m.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
Prepared By: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.

Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director reported on this item.

No public comment was received.

Council Member Anna Chouteau moved to approve staff's recommendation.

The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

16. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:

16.1 A. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - Executive Board B. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - General Assembly C. Napa Valley Tourism Corporation (Umbrella for Napa County) D. League of California Cities – North Bay Division
E. Napa County City Selection Committee
F. Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District G. Youth Opportunities Commission
H. Napa County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) I. Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA)
J. Napa County Watershed Information Center & Conservancy (WICC) K. Upper Valley Waste Management Agency
L. Napa County Groundwater Sustainability Plan Advisory Committee Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
May 28, 2024
M. Napa County Regional Climate Action Committee
N. Council Ad Hoc and Standing Committee Reports

17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Dohring adjourned the meeting at 9:26 p.m.

APPROVED:
______________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
Agenda Item #5.1.

MINUTES
City of St. Helena
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, June 11, 2024 @ 6:00 PM
Vintage Hall Board Room - Second Floor
465 Main Street, St. Helena
A complete video recording of this meeting, except for closed session, can be found at https://sthelena.civicweb.net/Portal/ or by calling the City Clerk at (707) 968-2742. The City Council video is the official record of the Council meeting.

Present: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers

Absent: None

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

4.1 Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to adopt the agenda. The motion was seconded by Council Member Patrick Kenealy and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None

6. PUBLIC FORUM:

No public comment was received.

7. REPORTS BY STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, and AB 1234 REPORTS:

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
Ethan Walsh, City Attorney noted that there was no reportable action from the June 11, 2024 special City Council closed session meeting.

Reports were made by staff and the City Council.

8. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC RECOGNITIONS
None.

9. STAFF BRIEFING

9.1 Report by Director of Public Works on activities related to the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Director of Public Works, Joe Leach reported on item.

10. CONSENT ITEMS
Members of the Council or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of considering alternative action, for extended discussion, or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions. (Roll Call Vote)

10.1 Approval of a resolution establishing designation of City’s agents by title to obtain Federal and/or State financial assistance through the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) under the California Disaster Assistance Act.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Recommendation:

Approve the attached resolution.

10.2 Proposed Approval of a Resolution Adopting and Approving the Publicly Available Pay Schedules in Accordance with the Requirement of California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, for members covered under the St.

Helena Employees Association (SHEA), St. Helena Professional Firefighters Association (SHPFA), Police Officers Association (POA), Unrepresented Compensation Program, and Part-time classifications.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director Recommendation:

Approval of the attached resolution.

10.3 Approval of a Resolution Authorizing the Designation of Authority and Updating the Process and Procedures in the Determination of Disability Retirements for Employees.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
Prepared By: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.

10.4 Adoption of a Resolution accepting the work and directing the filing of the Notice of Completion for the Crane Park Lighting Improvements project, Capital Improvement Program Project No. C19-03.

CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Rebecca White, Administrative Assistant
Recommendation:

Approve attached Resolution

10.5 Authorize the purchase of garbage, recycling and composting containers for all city parks for a not-to-exceed cost of $103,185 from Trash Can Warehouse to be fully reimbursed by a grant from the Upper Valley Waste Management Agency.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
Recommendation:

Approval of the purchase.

10.6 Approval of a resolution authorizing a 3-year agreement for Fire/Emergency Dispatch Services with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection/CAL Fire for a not-to-exceed amount of $286,232.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Alec Vidler, Administrative Assistant/Fire Inspector Recommendation:

Approve the Agreement with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection/Cal Fire for the term of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027 for a three-year amount not-to-exceed $286,232

10.7 This item was pulled.

Adoption of a Resolution approving the plans for the Downtown Sidewalk Improvements Phase 1B - Paver Repair Project and authorizing advertisement for bids.

10.8 This item was pulled.

Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Mead & Hunt Inc. to provide engineering, modeling and constructability of underwater activities needed to complete Capital Improvement Program Project No. W-109 Bell Canyon Reservoir Intake Tower and Project No. W-85 Bell Valve House Replacement Project for a total not-toAgenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
exceed cost of $1,043,211 and a 10% contingency of $104,321 for a total consultant budget of $1,147,532.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve items 10.1 through 10.6.

The motion was seconded by Council Member Anna Chouteau and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

10.7 Adoption of a Resolution approving the plans for the Downtown Sidewalk Improvements Phase 1B - Paver Repair Project and authorizing advertisement for bids.

CEQA Determination: Class I Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 of CEQA
Prepared By: Jose Calderon, Engineering Technician II
Recommendation:

Approve the Resolution.

Public Works Director, Joe Leach reported on item.

Public Comment was received by Anthony Micheli.

Council Member Anna Chouteau moved to approve the item. The motion was seconded by Council Member Patrick Kenealy and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

10.8 Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Mead & Hunt Inc. to provide engineering, modeling and constructability of underwater activities needed to complete Capital Improvement Program Project No. W-109 Bell Canyon Reservoir Intake Tower and Project No. W-85 Bell Valve House Replacement Project for a total not-toAgenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
exceed cost of $1,043,211 and a 10% contingency of $104,321 for a total consultant budget of $1,147,532.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
Recommendation:

Approve the contract as presented.

Public Works Director, Joe Leach, reported on item.

No public comment was received.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve the item. The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS

11.1 Approval of a Resolution approving the annexation of the property known as 2126 Madrona Avenue, St. Helena, CA (APN 009-470-010), in the St. Helena Municipal Sewer District No. 1, MSD Annexation No 149.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: Rebecca White, Administrative Assistant
Recommendation:

It is recommended the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the annexation of the territory into the St Helena Municipal Sewer District No. 1 MSD.

Joe Leach, Director of Public Works reported on the item.

Public Comment was received by Roy Piper.

Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve the annexation of the property known as 2126 Madrona Avenue, St. Helena, CA (APN 009-470-010), in the St.

Helena Municipal Sewer District No. 1, MSD Annexation No 149. The motion was seconded by Council Member Anna Chouteau and on roll call carried by the following vote:

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Council Member Patrick Kenealy
RECUSE: None

12. OLD BUSINESS

12.1 Consideration of:
1) A resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Helena, California, submitting to the qualified voters of the city a proposed city charter to authorize the City of St. Helena to enact a real property transfer tax and similar tax and assessment mechanisms beyond that provided by state law; at a general municipal election to be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held November 5, 2024; directing the city attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the proposed charter and providing for the filing of primary and rebuttal arguments and setting rules for the filing of written arguments regarding the proposed charter; and
(2) A resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Helena, California calling for the placement of a general tax measure on the November 5, 2024 general municipal election ballot for the submission to the qualified voters of a proposed supplemental real property transfer tax; requesting the county of napa to consolidate said election with the statewide general election of even date; and setting rules and deadlines for arguments and rebuttals for and against the measure.

CEQA Determination: Not a CEQA project
Prepared By: April Mitts, Assistant City Manager
Recommendation:

Approve the attached Resolutions.

City Manager Anil Comelo and Assistant City Manager April Mitts reported on the item.

Public Comment was received by Roy Piper and Hector Marroquin.

Council Member Anna Chouteau moved to approve a resolution of the City Council of the City of St. Helena, California, submitting to the qualified voters of the city a proposed city charter to authorize the City of St. Helena to enact a real property transfer tax and similar tax and assessment mechanisms beyond that provided by state law; at a general municipal election to be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held November 5, 2024; directing the Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
city attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the proposed charter and providing for the filing of primary and rebuttal arguments and setting rules for the filing of written arguments regarding the proposed charter; and The motion was seconded by Council Member Patrick Kenealy and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None
Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to approve a resolution (noting the typographical error to be corrected) of the City Council of the City of St. Helena, California calling for the placement of a general tax measure on the November 5, 2024 general municipal election ballot for the submission to the qualified voters of a proposed supplemental real property transfer tax; requesting the County of Napa to consolidate said election with the statewide general election of even date; and setting rules and deadlines for arguments and rebuttals for and against the measure. The motion was seconded by Council Member Anna Chouteau and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

13. NEW BUSINESS

13.1 Receive report and adopt a Resolution accepting the St. Helena Flood Project Condition Assessment Report.

CEQA Determination: Exempt
Prepared By: Joseph Leach, Public Works Director and City Engineer Recommendation:

Receive report and adopt associated Resolution.

Director of Public Works, Joe Leach and representatives Jeff Kashiwada and Steve Sullivan from Mead and Hunt reported on the item.

No public comment was received.

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
Vice Mayor Eric Hall moved to adopt the staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Council Member Billy Summers and on roll call carried by the following vote:

AYES: Mayor Paul Dohring, Vice Mayor Eric Hall, Council Member Anna Chouteau, Council Member Patrick Kenealy, and Council Member Billy Summers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RECUSE: None

14. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:

14.1 A. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - Executive Board B. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - General Assembly C. Napa Valley Tourism Corporation (Umbrella for Napa County) D. League of California Cities – North Bay Division
E. Napa County City Selection Committee
F. Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District G. Youth Opportunities Commission
H. Napa County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) I. Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA)
J. Napa County Watershed Information Center & Conservancy (WICC) K. Upper Valley Waste Management Agency
L. Napa County Groundwater Sustainability Plan Advisory Committee M. Napa County Regional Climate Action Committee
N. Council Ad Hoc and Standing Committee Reports

15. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Dohring adjourned the meeting at 8:42 p.m.

Agenda Item #5.1.

Regular City Council
June 11, 2024
APPROVED:
______________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
Agenda Item #5.1.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Public Works
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Mario Traverso, Project Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration and proposed adoption of a Resolution approving the plans for the C22-03 Jacob Meily Park
Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation Project and authorizing the advertisement for bids.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Adopt the attached resolution and authorize staff to solicit proposals for the C22-03 Jacob Meily Park Drainage Site Survey and Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation Project.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

The project is included in the City’s FY 2024-2028 CIP
approved by City Council on June 13, 2023.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

To adopt the project plans and authorize the Request For Bids per requirements of SHMC 3.04.240 for the C22-03
Jacob Meily Park Installation of New Turf and Upgrade
Irrigation Project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: The project's budget of $125,000 is included in the City's FY 2024 and FY 2025 adopted CIP budget, which was
approved by City Council on June 13, 2023, and funded by Park Impact Fees. No additional financial impact.

BACKGROUND:

In 2003, the soccer field at Jacob Meily Park was developed which included the installation of a proprietary irrigation system. The field turf and irrigation system has reached the end of its useful life. A Capital Improvement Project was created in 2022 to rehabilitate the irrigation, surface profile and turf of the sports field.

DISCUSSION:

Generally, the project will rehabilitate the sports field at Jacob Meily Park. During the investigation for the rehabilitation of the sports field, it was determined that the existing irrigation system is to be abandoned and a new conventional irrigation system is to be installed. Additionally, the site will be regraded to its original profile, and new sod/turf installed. The construction plans were prepared by Haley & Aldrich Engineering Consultants and are found as Attachment 3. Upon approval of the resolution, staff will finalize the bid package in anticipation for bid solicitation in early July in preparation for Fall 2024 construction.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: None
Agenda Item #10.1.

GOAL:

Goal 2: Improve Infrastructure & Further Environmental Sustainability Goal 5: Enhance Quality of Life
Goal 8: Implement Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) Projects Miscellaneous/Other DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Resolution
Attachment 2 - CIP Excerpt
Attachment 3 - Plans
Agenda Item #10.1.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -
Finding the C22-03 Jacob Meily Park Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation Project exempt from CEQA;
Approving and adopting the project plans; and
Authorizing the Bid Request for C22-03 Jacob Meily
Park Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation
Project.

RECITALS
A. The City of St. Helena is responsible for maintenance of City parks; and B. The field turf, surface profile and irrigation system of the sports field at Jacob Meily Park has reached the end of its useful life; and
C. A Capital Improvement Project was established in 2022 to rehabilitate the field and irrigation system; and
D. The project is included in the City’s FY 2024-2028 CIP approved by City Council on June 13, 2023 with an approved budget of $125,000, funded by Park Impact Fees; and
E. The project plans for Jacob Meily Park Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation Project have been prepared by Haley and Aldrich Consulting Engineers, reviewed by the City Engineer, and presented for approval and authorization to bid.

RESOLUTION
The City Council of the City of St. Helena hereby resolves as follows:

1. The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301, Existing Facilities Class 1 which exempts the operation, repair, maintenance, and permitting of existing facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use including publicly owned facilities; and

2. The Project Plans will be available on the City of St. Helena’s website and for viewing at St. Helena Public Works, 1088 College Avenue, are hereby approved; and

3. The Public Works Director/City Engineer is authorized to solicit bids for the subject project.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024, by the following vote:

Agenda Item #10.1.

Mayor Dohring: __________
Vice Mayor Hall: __________
Councilmember Chouteau: __________
Councilmember Kenealy: __________
Councilmember Summers: __________
APPROVED: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.1.

Jacob Meily Park Drainage Site Survey and Installation of New Turf and Upgrade Irrigation Category:

Project Jacob Meily Park St. Helena
Civic
Project No: C22-03
Location:

Responsible
Department:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2027-28

PROJECT
TOTAL

EXPENDITURES
(Thousands of Dollars)
2026-27
Total YTD
05/16/23
3110 - Design 20,000 20,000
3160 - Construction Contract 105,500 105,500
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 20,000 105,500 125,500
FUNDING SOURCES
734-Park Impact Fees 20,000 105,500 125,500
FUNDING TOTALS 20,000 105,500 125,500
PROJECT PURPOSE & DESCRIPTION:   FY 23 conduct a site survey to address drainage and FY 24 install new turf and upgrade irrigation
Moved out 1 year due to Water Emergency
NOTES:   FY 23 - P&R Commission Direction - (1) proceed with design in FY 23 and construction in FY 24

Add to scope for design - Astroturf vs. grass
FY24 - change budget for design; keep overall budget but increase construction; assume consultant to develop topographic survey and grading/irrigation design
EXPENDITURE ACCOUNTS:        Fund: 733    Dept:  5010
11 Agenda Item #10.1.

785 Ygnacio Valley Road Walnut Creek, CA 94596
A division of Haley & Aldrich Phone: (925) 935-9771
Agenda Item #10.1.

50 50
50 50 50 50 50 50 50
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 40
50 50
50 40
PMV FSEX.2-4"SL 30 2.5" EX.2-4"SL C-1 1.5 30 C-2 1.5 30 C-3 2 55 C-4 1.5 40 C-5 1.5 40 C-6 1.5 30 C-7
2 50 C-8 1.5 30 C-9 1.5 45 C-10 1.5 43 1.5" 1.5" 1.5" 1.5" 1.5" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.25" 1.5" 2" 2" 2.5" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 1" 1.25" 1" 1" 1" 1" 2" 2" 1.5" 1.5" 1.25" 2" 2" 1.5" 0 20 40 60 80 SCALE IN FEET IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "C". MOUNT ON INTERIOR WALL AT THIS LOCATION AS DETAILED AND AS DIRECTED BY ARCHITECT. CONNECT TO 120 VOLT A.C. ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLED AT THIS LOCATION UNDER ELECTRICAL CONTRACT. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WIRELESS WEATHER SENSOR AND RAIN SENSOR. MOUNT ON EAVE OF BUILDING. INSTALL SENSOR OPEN TO THE SKY. COORDINATE AND CONFIRM EXACT LOCATION WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION BOOSTER PUMP-"P" INSTALL AT THIS LOCATION AS DIRECTED MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVES. CONNECT TO 240 VOLT SINGLE PHASE A.C. ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLED AT THIS LOCATION UNDER SITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACT. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PRESSURE ON DISCHARGE SIDE OF BOOSTER PUMP SHALL BE 75 PSI APPROXIMATE LOCATON OF EXISTING IRRIGATION LINE FROM EXISTING WELL. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD LOCATE EXACT LOCATION WITH CITY MAINTAINANCE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.ROUTE NEW 2.5" MAIN LINE TO BOOSTER PUMP. MAXIMUM IRRIGATION DEMAND: 30-55 GPM AT APPROXIMATELY 50 PSI STATIC PRESSURE FROM WELL LOCATED OFF SITE. 1PLAN NOTES LEGEND NOTES: 1. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN HARDSCAPE FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHIN PLANTED AREAS. IRRIGATION PIPE AND WIRE CROSSING BENEATH HARDSCAPE SURFACES SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN SLEEVING OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT. SLEEVING SIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE AGGREGATE DIAMETER OF ALL PIPES CONTAINED WITH SLEEVE. PROVIDE VERTICAL SWEEP FOR ALL ELECTRICAL CONDUIT ON EACH SIDE OF HARDSCAPE AND TERMINATE ENDS AT 12" MINIMUM DEPTH AND 12" FROM HARDSCAPE SURFACE. 2. SIZING OF LATERAL PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1" 7-12 GPM 1.25" 13-20 GPM 1.5" 21-32 GPM 2" 33-55 GPM23 1 2
3 4
4 Date: Rev. Description By Date Approved By: Checked By: Drawn By: Designed By: Project No.: Scale: Stamp: Sheet: of C:\CM HOME DWG\24-064 JACOB MEILY PARK - ST HELENA\CAD\CAD\JMP-STHELENA-IRRIGATION_DESIGN.DWG CMITCHELL 5/12/2024 9:44 AM Printed: Saved by: I-100 IRRIGATION PLAN Sheet: C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL 04/22/2024 24-064 4 JACOB MEILY PARK, ST. HELENA, CA IRRIGATION PLAN I-100 1 Agenda Item #10.1.

I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN PLANS. 1. THESE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATIVE OF THE WORK TO BE INSTALLED. ALL PIPING, VALVES, AND OTHER IRRIGATION COMPONENTS MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY AND ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS. DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE DRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSETS, FITTINGS, SLEEVES, CONDUIT, AND OTHER ITEMS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED. INVESTIGATE THE STRUCTURAL AND FINISHED CONDITION AFFECTING THE CONTRACT WORK INCLUDING OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR AREA DIMENSIONAL DIFFERENCES. IN THE EVENT OF FIELD DISCREPANCY WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, PLAN THE INSTALLATION WORK ACCORDINGLY BY NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. NOTIFY AND COORDINATE IRRIGATION CONTRACT WORK WITH APPLICABLE CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE, CONDUIT OR SLEEVES THROUGH OR UNDER WALLS, ROADWAYS, PAVING AND STRUCTURES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. IN THE EVENT THESE NOTIFICATIONS ARE NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR REQUIRED REVISIONS. 2. THESE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATIVE OF THE WORK TO BE INSTALLED. ALL PIPING, VALVES, AND OTHER IRRIGATION COMPONENTS MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY AND ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS. DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE DRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSETS, FITTINGS, SLEEVES, CONDUIT, AND OTHER ITEMS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED. IN THE EVENT OF FIELD DISCREPANCY WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, PLAN THE INSTALLATION WORK ACCORDINGLY BY NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. NOTIFY AND COORDINATE IRRIGATION CONTRACT WORK WITH APPLICABLE CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE, CONDUIT OR SLEEVES THROUGH OR UNDER WALL, ROADWAYS, PAVING AND STRUCTURES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. IN THE EVENT THESE NOTIFICATIONS ARE NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR REQUIRED REVISIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND REGULATIONS. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE; THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, PUBLISHED BY THE WESTERN PLUMBING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION; AND OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS. NOTHING IN THESE DRAWINGS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES OR REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH WITHOUT ANY EXTRA CHARGE, ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIAL AND LABOR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE COMPLIANCE WITH THESE CODES AND REGULATIONS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH LAYOUT AND INSTALLATION OF THE PLANT MATERIALS TO INSURE THAT THERE WILL BE COMPLETE AND UNIFORM IRRIGATION COVERAGE OF PLANTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE DRAWINGS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE IF ANY CHANGES, DELETIONS, OR ADDITIONS ARE REQUIRED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL. 5. THE INTENT OF THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER REQUIRED TO SUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH. 6. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER TO PROGRAM THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S) TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER NEEDED TO SUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH. THIS INCLUDES MAKING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PROGRAM FOR SEASONAL WEATHER CHANGES, PLANT MATERIAL, WATER REQUIREMENTS, MOUNDS, SLOPES, SUN, SHADE AND WIND EXPOSURE. 7. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 120 VOLT A.C. (2.5 AMP DEMAND PER CONTROLLER) ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION(S). IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE STUB-OUT TO THE CONTROLLER(S). PROVIDE PROPER GROUNDING PER CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 8. INSTALL NEW BATTERIES IN THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S) TO RETAIN PROGRAM IN MEMORY DURING TEMPORARY POWER FAILURES. USE QUANTITY, TYPE AND SIZE REQUIRED AS PER CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 9. SCHEDULE A MEETING WHICH INCLUDES REPRESENTATIVES OF THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER, THE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR, THE OWNER AND THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR AT THE SITE FOR INSTRUCTION ON THE PROPER PROGRAMMING AND OPERATION OF THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER. 10. INSTALL 3" DETECTABLE TAPE ABOVE ALL PRESSURIZED MAIN LINES AS DETAILED. USE CHRISTY MODEL #TA-DT-3-BIRR FOR POTABLE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. 11. PROVIDE EACH IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WITH ITS OWN INDEPENDENT LOW VOLTAGE COMMON GROUND WIRE. 12. IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRES: SOLID COPPER WITH U.L. APPROVAL FOR DIRECT BURIAL IN GROUND. COMMON GROUND WIRE: SIZE #12-1 WIRE WITH A WHITE INSULATING JACKET. CONTROL WIRE SERVICING REMOTE CONTROL VALVES: SIZE #14-1 WIRE WITH INSULATING JACKET OF COLOR OTHER THAN WHITE. SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITH 3M-DBY SEAL PACKS OR APPROVED EQUAL. 13. INSTALL TWO SPARE CONTROL WIRES OF A DIFFERENT COLOR ALONG THE ENTIRE MAIN LINE. LOOP 36" EXCESS WIRE INTO EACH SINGLE VALVE BOX AND INTO ONE VALVE BOX IN EACH GROUP OF VALVES. 14. SPLICING OF LOW VOLTAGE WIRES IS PERMITTED IN VALVE BOXES ONLY. LEAVE A 36" LONG, 1" DIAMETER COIL OF EXCESS WIRE AT EACH SPLICE AND A 36" LONG EXPANSION LOOP EVERY 100 FEET ALONG WIRE RUN. TAPE WIRES TOGETHER EVERY TEN FEET. DO NOT TAPE WIRES TOGETHER WHERE CONTAINED WITHIN SLEEVING OR CONDUIT. 15. INSTALL GREEN PLASTIC VALVE BOXES WITH BOLT DOWN, NON HINGED COVER MARKED "IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE". BOX BODY SHALL HAVE KNOCK OUTS. ACCEPTABLE VALVE BOX MANUFACTURER'S INCLUDE NDS, CARSON OR APPROVED EQUAL. 16. INSTALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE BOXES 12" FROM WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE. AT MULTIPLE VALVE BOX GROUPS, INSTALL EACH BOX AN EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THE WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE AND PROVIDE 12" BETWEEN BOX TOPS. ALIGN THE SHORT SIDE OF RECTANGULAR VALVE BOXES PARALLEL TO WALK, CURB, BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE. 17. VALVE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. INSTALL IN PLANTING AREAS. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LABEL CONTROL LINE WIRE AT EACH REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH A 2 1/4" X 2 3/4" POLYURETHANE I.D. TAG, INDICATING IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF VALVE (CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER). ATTACH LABEL TO CONTROL WIRE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERMANENTLY STAMP ALL VALVE BOX LIDS WITH APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION AS NOTED IN CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. 19. FLUSH AND ADJUST IRRIGATION OUTLETS AND NOZZLES FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVER SPRAY ONTO WALKS, ROADWAYS, AND/OR BUILDINGS. SELECT THE BEST DEGREE OF THE ARC AND RADIUS TO FIT THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND THROTTLE THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVE TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH CONTROL ZONE. 20. SET SPRINKLER HEADS PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE. 21. WHERE IT IS NECESSARY TO EXCAVATE ADJACENT TO EXISTING TREES, USE CAUTION TO AVOID INJURY TO TREES AND TREE ROOTS. EXCAVATE BY HAND IN AREAS WHERE TWO (2) INCH AND LARGER ROOTS OCCUR. BACK FILL TRENCHES ADJACENT TO TREE WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS. WHERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, SHADE THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH ADJACENT TO THE TREE WITH WET BURLAP OR CANVAS. 22. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON THE MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS. VERIFY WATER PRESSURE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WATER PRESSURE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE ACTUAL PRESSURE READING AT THE IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 23. IRRIGATION DEMAND: REFER TO PLANS. 24. THE EXISTING MAIN LINE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IS DIAGRAMMATIC. VERIFY AND LOCATE EXISTING MAIN LINE IN FIELD. REPORT TO ARCHITECT IN WRITING ANY DEVIATION OF EXISTING MAIN LINE LOCATION FROM THAT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 25. PIPE SIZING SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IS TYPICAL. AS CHANGES IN LAYOUT OCCUR DURING STAKING AND CONSTRUCTION THE SIZE MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. 26. PIPE THREAD SEALANT COMPOUND SHALL BE RECTOR SEAL #5. 27. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MINOR CHANGES IN THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT DUE TO OBSTRUCTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION DRAWINGS SUCH AS LIGHTS, FIRE HYDRANTS, SIGNS, ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURES, ETC. 28. WHEN WORK OF THIS SECTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND SUCH OTHER TIMES AS MAY BE DIRECTED, REMOVE ALL TRASH, DEBRIS, SURPLUS MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FROM SITE. 29. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL IRRIGATION COMPONENTS INSTALLED WITHIN A VALVE BOX WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. DO NOT INSTALL UNTIL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PROVIDES ACCEPTABLE LOCATIONS. IRRIGATION NOTES I-40-06-SS/15 3/4" AND LARGER: 1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS. 12" COVER. REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZE (IN INCHES) LATERAL LINE: FLOW (GPM) CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER 2 1/2" AND SMALLER: 1120-SCHEDULE 40 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS. 18" COVER. MAIN LINE: ASSOCIATED REMOTE CONTROL VALVE RS-1000 IRRITROL WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR EGP8-EG/EGP8-OP8 EG-iCENTRAL RAIN MASTER EAGLE PLUS 16 STATION CONTROLLER IN A LARGE WALL MOUNTED PAINTED ENCLOSURE; INCLUDES I-CARD AND FIVE YEAR RAIN MASTER I-CENTRAL SERVICE. 44-LRC RAIN BIRD 1" TWO-PIECE QUICK COUPLING VALVE (YELLOW LOCKING RUBBER COVER) T113-K SERIES NIBCO BRASS GATE VALVE (LINE SIZE)-2.5" AND SMALLER MV 3300-2" SUPERIOR MASTER VALVE (NORMALLY OPEN) FS 100P SERIES IRRITROL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE11.3 HUNTER POP-UP GEAR 15.7 45-55 DRIVEN ROTOR (TURF) 6060 HUNTER POP-UP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR (TURF) HUNTER POP-UP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR (TURF) 45-55 60 45-55 HUNTER POP-UP GEAR 2.96 DRIVEN ROTOR (TURF) 45 25-30 30 9.2 HUNTER POP-UP GEAR 9.2 35-40 DRIVEN ROTOR (TURF) HUNTER POP-UP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR (TURF) 60 35-40 40 60 40 I-40-06-SS/15 15.7 I-40-06-SS/10 I-25-06-SS/8 I-25-06-SS/8 I-20-06/MPR-30 IRRIGATION LEGEND SYMBOL OPERATING DESCRIPTION PSI NOZZLE GPM OPERATING MODEL NUMBER RADIUS (FEET) QS200-20 FLOMEC 2 PVC FLOW SENSOR 505050 P CB##V1C002X00055-025 XXXX241ONS-2-SS PPS NOVA VFD 3 HP BOOSTER PUMP WITHIN AN ENCLOSURE (240V 1 PHASE POWER) CONTACT STEVEN KIM 760-214-5734 FOR MORE INFORMATION. WATER USE CALCULATIONS Date: Rev. Description By Date Approved By: Checked By: Drawn By: Designed By: Project No.: Scale: Stamp: Sheet: of C:\CM HOME DWG\24-064 JACOB MEILY PARK - ST HELENA\CAD\CAD\JMP-STHELENA-IRRIGATION_DESIGN.DWG CMITCHELL 5/12/2024 9:45 AM Printed: Saved by: I-101 IRRIGATION LEGEND & NOTES Sheet: C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL 04/22/2024 24-064 4 JACOB MEILY PARK, ST. HELENA, CA IRRIGATION LEGEND, NOTES & CALCS I-101 2 1.5" CONDUIT AND SWEEPS FOR POWER WIRE TO BOOSTER PUMP FROM EXISTING PANEL. WIRE SIZE AND # OF WATER TO BE DETERMINE BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. CONNECT TO PANEL WITH REQUIRED BREAKER FOR PUMP. 1- 1" CONDUIT FOR FLOW SENSOR WIRE AND 1- 1.5" CONDUIT FOR LOW VOLTAGE WIRES FROM CONTROLLER TO SERVICE MASTER VALVE AND ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES.

Agenda Item #10.1.

1 2
3 4
1 NOTE:
5 2
3 4
5 3
1 MAXIMUM LINE OF SIGHT FROM SENSOR TO RECEIVER IS 1000 FT. DISTANCE IS LESS IF OBSTRUCTIONS EXIST. SENSOR MUST BE INSTALLED IN "CLEAR SPACE" WHERE IT IS EXPOSED TO UNOBSTRUCTED RAINFALL AND IS CLEAR OF IRRIGATION SPRAY. SCALE: NONE WIRELESS WEATHER SENSOR WIRELESS CLIMATE SENSOR TRANSMITTER (EVE/GUTTER MOUNTED) MOUNT SENSOR ON GUTTER/EVE GUTTER/EVE CONTROLLER SENSOR RECEIVER 3 18" MIN. SCALE: NONE SCHEDULE 40 GRAY PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WITH SWEEPS FOR LOW VOLTAGE WIRE. ROUTE CONDUIT TO NEAREST PLANTER AND PLACE IN SPLICE BOX. EXTERIOR WALL ELECTRICAL PULL BOX PER ELECTRICAL CODE FINISH GRADE 1 23 4
8 1
2 4 INTERIOR WALL RECTANGULAR 14" X 19" SPLICE BOX
5 3
9 DBY SPLICE KIT
8 5
9 LOW VOLTAGE WIRES TO CONTROLLER
6 6 PLANTER WHEN POSSIBLE USE DIRECT WIRE PULLS FROM CONTROLLER TO REMOTE CONTROL VALVES. IF NECESSARY USE MULTI-STRAND WIRE FROM CONTROLLER TO SPLICE BOX. MAKE SPLICES WATER TIGHT WITH DBY CONNECTORS. SPLICES TO OCCUR IN SPLICE BOX ONLY. NOTE:
7 7 DIRECT BURIAL LOW VOLTAGE WIRES ROUTED TO REMOTE CONTROL VALVES 10 10 CONTROLLER(S) 2 INTERIOR MOUNTED CONTROLLER SCALE: NONE 6 QUICK COUPLING VALVE SCALE: NONE
7 VALVE BOX INSTALLATION NOTE: SIDE VIEW TOP VIEW 1" [25mm] 10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. 1 1/4" x 1 1/4" x 3/16" [30mm x 30mm x 5mm] ANGLE IRON 30" [760mm] LONG W/2 STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS (ONE AROUND QCV). PVC MAIN LINE. 3" [75mm] LONG SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE. QUICK COUPLING VALVE. SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE. 10" [250mm] LONG SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE. UPC APPROVED SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE OR ELBOW. SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED 90° ELL. 1 2345
6 78910 NIPPLES AND FITTINGS TO BE SAME SIZE AS VALVE IPT INLET THREAD SIZE. REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND 1 2
3 4
659101112 FINISH GRADE.78 19 GAUGE 1/2" [13mm] SQUARE WIRE MESH. BRICK - 2 TOTAL. 1112 PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK- 4" [100mm] DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL IN VALVE BOX). 13 13 SCALE: NONE 5 TRENCHING
2 1
356 CLEAN BACKFILL MATERIAL. FINISH GRADE. LATERAL LINE. MAIN LINE. LOW VOLTAGE CONTROL WIRES, TWO-WIRE CABLE, OR CONDUIT WITH WIRES. FOR MULTIPLE WIRES, TAPE AND BUNDLE WIRES AT 10 FT. INTERVALS. WIRING SHALL BE LAID OUT LOOSELY IN THE TRENCH.4 3" DETECTABLE WARNING TAPE OVER MAIN LINE. INSTALL 3" ABOVE MAIN LINE. USE CHRISTY MODEL #TA-DT-3-BIRR FOR POTABLE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OR #TA-DT-3-PRW FOR RECYCLED IRRIGATION WATER SYSTEMS NOTES: 1. ALL MAIN SUPPLY LINES AND LATERAL LINES SHALL BE PLACED IN SLEEVES UNDER PAVED SURFACES. INSTALL LOW VOLTAGE WIRES WITHIN A SEPARATE CONDUIT UNDER PAVED SURFACES. DO NOT TAPE WIRES WITHIN CONDUIT. 2. REUSE SALVAGED EXCAVATED FILL AND COMPACT TO ORIGINAL DENSITY IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE AT 95% COMPACTION. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE THE EARTH EXCAVATED FROM THE TRENCHES, FREE FROM ROCKS (ANYTHING LARGER THAN 2"), CONCRETE CHUNKS, AND OTHER FOREIGN OR COARSE MATERIALS. 3. WHEN 12" POP-UP SPRINKLER HEADS ARE USED, INCREASE THE DEPTH OF LATERAL TO 18" AT THE SPRINKLER LOCATION ONLY. 8"-12" MIN. LATERAL, MAIN, AND WIRES 6" MIN. MAIN AND WIRES ONLY LATERAL ONLY 6" MIN. MULTIPLE LATERALS 6"-12" MIN. 4" 18" 12" 4" 213465 A1 12" TYPICAL INSTRUCTIONS: 1. CENTER VALVE BOX OVER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE TO FACILITATE SERVICING VALVE. 2. SET BOXES 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH COVER IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA AND FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREA. 3. SET RCV AND VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA WHERE POSSIBLE. INSTALL IN LAWN ONLY IF GROUND COVER DOES NOT EXIST ADJACENT TO LAWN. 4. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE, CURB, ETC. 5. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND VALVE BOXES TO PREVENT COLLAPSE AND DEFORMATION OF VALVE BOX SIDES. 6. INSTALL EXTENSION BY VALVE BOX MANUFACTURER AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE ASSEMBLY FOR EASY ACCESS. 12" 1 CONTROLLER ID.
3 RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. ROUND VALVE BOX FOR QCV AND GATE VALVE. HEAT BRAND VALVE TYPE INTO INTO LID PER TABLE. EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE, CURB, ETC. 1 TREE2
2 ALL TREE VALVES TO HAVE TREE BRANDED INTO LID.
3 VALVE IDENTIFICATION 12" 12"5
5 TOP VIEW OF BOXES7
7 ITEMS TO BRAND: BRAND CODE GATE VALVE GV PRESSURE REDUCER PRV MASTER VALVE MV FLOW SENSOR FS SPLICE BOX SB QUICK COUPLER QC PULL BOX PB LIGHTNING ARRESTOR LA MAIN LINE AIR RELIEF ARV HYDROMETER HM GROUND ROD GR REMOTE CONTROL VALVE A___ A1 XX 4 4 HEAT BRAND VALVE TYPE PER TABLE OR CONTROLLER ID AND STATION NUMBER INTO LID. 6 6 STATION NUMBER. FLOW SENSOR MUST BE INSTALLED WITH INSERT (TOP) POSITIONED VERTICALLY AND BODY (TEE) POSITIONED HORIZONTALLY. FOR FLOWMEC SENSORS INSTALL ON 45° ANGLE. RED BLK FLOW SENSOR 10 PIPE DIAMETERSNO VALVES, REDUCERS, OR ELBOWS IN THIS AREA TO CONTROLLER 5 PIPE DIAMETERS 19 21 20 18 18 GAUGE AWG DIRECT BURIAL WIRE. FLOW SENSOR WIRE MUST BE RUN IN 1" PVC CONDUIT FROM FLOW SENSOR TO CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE. PROVIDE 3M-DBY SEAL PACKS AT ALL SPLICES AND 36" OF EXCESS WIRE IN A 1" DIAMETER COIL. FOR TWO-WIRE PROJECTS ROUTE CONDUIT AND TWO CABLE INTO SENSOR BOX AND USE SENSOR DECODER THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH CONTROLLER AND SENSOR. 19 SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT FOR SENSOR WIRE OR TWO WIRE CABLE FROM CONTROLLER. 20 21 10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. INSTALL BOX AS SHOWN IN BOX INSTALLATION DETAIL. SCALE: NONE MASTER VALVE & FLOW SENSOR INSTALLATION MASTER VALVE 1SCHEDULE 80 PVC 45° ELBOW (SxS) 14" X 19" RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. INSTALL BOX AS SHOWN IN BOX INSTALLATION DETAIL. MASTER CONTROL VALVE WITH FLOW CONTROL AND MANUAL BLEED (PRESSURE REGULATOR WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS). CENTER WITHIN BOX. VALVE CONTROL WIRE- PROVIDE 3M-DBY SEAL PACKS AT ALL SPLICES AND 36" OF EXCESS UF WIRE IN A 1" DIAMETER COIL. FOR TWO-WIRE PROJECTS ROUTE CONDUIT AND TWO CABLE INTO VALVE BOX AND USE DECODER THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH CONTROLLER AND VALVE. REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND. FINISH GRADE. 432
1 11
8 1/2" MESH, 19 GAUGE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE TO COVER VALVE BOX BOTTOM AND CUTOUTS. PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK- 4" [100mm] DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL IN VALVE BOX). BRICK-ONE ON EACH CORNER OR THREE FOR ROUND BOXES. 1316 SCH 80 PVC PIPE. LENGTH AS REQUIRED. 65 PVC MAIN LINE FROM BACKFLOW OR PUMP.
7 9 SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER- 2 TOTAL. SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED UNION-2 TOTAL. 10 3" LONG SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE-2 TOTAL. MATCH VALVE SIZE. 1214 3" MIN 6" MAX. 15 SCH 80 PVC MAIN LINE TO FLOW SENSOR. 1 23 15 14
8 46
5 7
9 10 11 12 13 16
3 18 17 17 IF NECESSARY INSTALL A SCH. 80 REDUCING COUPLING, TYP. 48 11 16 FLOW FLOW 22 SCH. 80 REDUCING COUPLING UPSIZING TO MAIN LINE SERVICING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IF REQUIRED. 22 FLOWMEC SENSORS 3" 10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID. 8" CLASS 160 OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE (NOTCH TO FIT OVER MAIN LINE PIPE). SCH 80 TOE NIPPLE. 6" IN LENGTH. (2 TOTAL) FINISH GRADE. PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK - 4" DEEP (NO SOIL IN VALVE BOX). BRICK-2 TOTAL. GATE VALVE WITH X-TOP HANDLE. 1236
7810 REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND
1 23
678109
9 19 GAUGE 1/2" SQUARE WIRE MESH. WRAP UP SIDES OF BOX. SCALE: NONE 4 GATE VALVE - 3" AND SMALLER
5 4
4 5 PVC MAIN LINE. SCH 80 COUPLING (2 TOTAL) Date: Rev. Description By Date Approved By: Checked By: Drawn By: Designed By: Project No.: Scale: Stamp: Sheet: of C:\CM HOME DWG\24-064 JACOB MEILY PARK - ST HELENA\CAD\CAD\JMP-STHELENA-IRRIGATION_DESIGN.DWG CMITCHELL 5/12/2024 9:45 AM Printed: Saved by: I-102 IRRIGATION DETAILS Sheet: C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL 04/22/2024 24-064 4 JACOB MEILY PARK, ST. HELENA, CA IRRIGATION DETAILS I-102 3 Agenda Item #10.1.

SCALE: NONE
2 WEATHERPROOF WIRE SPLICE ASSEMBLY SCALE: NONE
3 POP-UP ROTARY SPRINKLER - TURF VALVE I.D. TAG (CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER). REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH FLOW CONTROL AND MANUAL BLEED (PRESSURE REGULATOR WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS). SCHEDULE 80 PVC 90° ELBOW (TxT). PVC MAIN LINE. PEA GRAVEL OR 3/4" DRAIN ROCK- 4" [100mm] DEEP BELOW VALVE (NO SOIL IN VALVE BOX). SCHEDULE 40 OR 80 PVC TEE. REFER TO LEGEND FOR TYPE. VALVE CONTROL WIRE- PROVIDE SEAL PACKS AT ALL SPLICES AND 3' [1m] OF EXCESS UF WIRE IN A 1" [25mm] DIAMETER COIL. REFER TO IRRIGATION SPECS. SCHEDULE 80 PVC THREADED UNION. PVC LATERAL LINE. BRICK-1 EACH CORNER. 19 GAUGE 1/2" [12mm] SQUARE WIRE MESH. SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE- LENGTH AS REQUIRED. FINISH GRADE. 1 234
5 6
789 10 11 12 13 14151617
56432
1 7 111210
9 81314151617 SCHEDULE 80 PVC UNION BALL VALVE (ONE PER VALVE). 1818 SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (3 TOTAL). 3" [75mm] MIN, 6" [150mm] MAX. SCALE: NONE 1 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE USE A NDS PRO SERIES 14" X 19" RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LID FOR 1" VALVES. FOR 1.5" AND LARGER VALVES INSTALL BALL VALVE WITHIN A SEPARATE 10" ROUND BOX OR ONE BALL VALVE PER MANIFOLD OF VALVES. GATE VALVE SIZE SHALL BE SAME AS LARGEST VALVE WITHIN MANIFOLD. ONE VALVE PER BOX- NO EXCEPTIONS. INSTALL BOX AS SHOWN IN BOX INSTALLATION DETAIL.19 19 SCHEDULE 40 MALE ADAPTER INSTRUCTIONS: 1. STRIP WIRES APPROXIMATELY 1/2" FROM ENDS TO EXPOSE WIRE. 2. TWIST CONNECTOR AROUND WIRES CLOCKWISE UNTIL HAND TIGHT, DO NOT OVERTIGHTEN. 3. INSERT WIRE ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF GEL-FILLED TUBE. CHECK TO MAKE SURE CONNECTOR HAS BEEN PUSHED PAST LOCKING FINGERS AND IS SEATED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TUBE. 4. PLACE WIRES WHICH EXIT TUBE IN WIRE EXIT HOLES AND CLOSE CAP UNTIL IT SNAPS. 5. INSPECT FINAL SPLICE ASSEMBLY THAT IT IS SECURED. NOTE: MAXIMUM # OF WIRES PER CONNECTOR: · 3-#14 GAUGE · 2-#12 GAUGE STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW WALL, WALK, CURB OR HEADER. PVC LATERAL LINE. POP-UP ROTARY SPRINKLER. FINISH GRADE. 1 234
1 2
34565 REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND SET SPRINKLER 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE AT TIME OF INSTALLATION - LOWER TO FINISH GRADE WHEN TURF IS WELL ESTABLISHED. 1. NOTES:
6 SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE OR ELBOW WITH THREADED OUTLET.
5 UNITIZED SWING JOINT: 3/4"-LASCO MODEL T732-212 1"-LASCO MODEL T932-212. 2" Date: Rev. Description By Date Approved By: Checked By: Drawn By: Designed By: Project No.: Scale: Stamp: Sheet: of C:\CM HOME DWG\24-064 JACOB MEILY PARK - ST HELENA\CAD\CAD\JMP-STHELENA-IRRIGATION_DESIGN.DWG CMITCHELL 5/12/2024 9:45 AM Printed: Saved by: I-103 IRRIGATION DETAILS Sheet: C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL C. MITCHELL 04/22/2024 24-064 4 JACOB MEILY PARK, ST. HELENA, CA IRRIGATION DETAILS I-103 4 Agenda Item #10.1.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Public Works
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Jose Calderon, Engineering Technician II
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution adding a portion of McCorkle Avenue to the City’s List of Red Zones (parking
prohibitions) and rescinding Resolution 2023-71

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Approve Resolution adding portion of McCorkle Avenue to the City’s List of Red Zones (parking prohibitions) and rescinding Resolution 2023-71.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

Resolution 2023-71 adopted by City Council on June 27,
2023.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

For better visibility entering and exiting the Driveway at 710 McCorkle Avenue. Vehicles park to close to the
driveway,
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Work could be completed by Public Works Staff during normal business hours and using readily available paint.

No financial impact.

BACKGROUND:

City Staff received correspondence from a representative of Our Town St. Helena (OTSH) which reported that street parking on McCorkle Avenue was encroaching on the driveway entrance of 710 McCorkle Avenue. The location of parked vehicles is preventing vehicles from McCorkle of entering and exiting safely out of the driveway.

City Staff reviewed the correspondence and the area referenced and presents the following discussion.

DISCUSSION:

City Staff is recommending that a red Curb be painted to provide an additional five feet of clearance on the southwest and northeast side of the driveway. 710 McCorkle Avenue has multiple dwellings that use that driveway to enter and exit. McCorkle Avenue is a narrow residential street with a 25MPH speed limit. Street parking is permitted on both sides of the street. Due to residents parking to close to the driveway, it has become a safety concern when entering and exiting.

Public Works staff conferred with Police and Fire department staff. Police department staff did not have an objection to the request for additional red curb.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental impact
GOAL:

Agenda Item #10.2.

Goal 2: Improve Infrastructure & Further Environmental Sustainability Goal 5: Enhance Quality of Life
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1_ Resolution. adding Red Zone and Rescinding Resolution 2023-71 Attachment 2- McCorkle
Agenda Item #10.2.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX
Resolution rescinding Resolution 2023-71 and adding portion of McCorkle Avenue to the City’s List of Red Zones (parking prohibitions)

RECITALS
The Police Chief, Fire Chief and the Public Works Director have identified certain locations for which no parking is recommended in addition to those already in existence. New locations are identified with an underline in the following resolution.

Locations not marked by an underline are locations already designated as no parking zones.

RESOLUTION

1. No parking zones or No stopping zones established within Resolution No. 2023- 71 are hereby rescinded except to the extent that they are re-established below in this resolution.

2. For purposes of this resolution:
"Curb" means the concrete curbing installed along the side of the street or roadway or, if there is none, the edge of the traveled portion of the street or roadway.
"Intersection" means the point established by extending curb lines of the designated streets without regard for an arced curb installed to provide a turning radius between roadways.

3. Pursuant to Sections 10.10 and 10.11.1 of the City Code the following locations are designated as no parking or no stopping zones within which parking of vehicles on City streets is prohibited.

4. The new restrictions would not go into effect until the proposed paving and striping improvements for Grayson Avenue and South Crane Avenue are constructed.

A) ADAMS STREET

1. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Adams and Kearney Streets thence 25 feet easterly along the north side of Adams Street.

2. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Adams and Kearney Streets thence 72 feet westerly along the south side of Adams Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

3. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Adams Street and Money Way thence 30 feet easterly along the south side of Adams Street.

4. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Adams Street and Napa Valley Wine Train Tracks thence easterly 30 feet along the south side of Adams Street.

5. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Adams Street and Main Street 42 feet easterly to the point of beginning, thence 20 feet easterly along the south side of Adams Street.

6. Commencing on the south side of Adams Street 138 feet easterly from Main Street thence 20 feet easterly along the south side of Adams Street.

7. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Adams Street and Railroad Avenue thence westerly 28 feet along the north side of Adams Street.

8. Commencing at a point 65 feet east of Main Street thence easterly 20 feet along the north side of Adams Street.

9. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Adams Street and Oak Avenue thence easterly 20 feet on the north side of Adams Street.

10. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Adams Street and Oak Avenue thence easterly 30 feet along the south side of Adams Street.

11. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Adams Street and Oak Avenue thence easterly 25 feet along the north side of Adams Street.

12. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Adams Street and Main Street thence westerly 31 feet along the south side of Adams Street.

13. Commencing at the westerly edge of the westerly driveway of 899 Adams Street thence westerly 30 feet along the south side of Adams Street.

14. Commencing at the easterly edge of the most easterly driveway of the 1010 Adams Street Bank Building and Pharmacy, thence easterly thirty (30) feet along the south side of Adams.

B) ALEXANDER COURT

1. Commencing at the southerly intersection of Alexander Court and Main Street thence westerly along the north side of Alexander Court 160 feet, thence northerly along a curve to the right 160 feet, thence easterly along the southerly side 160 feet to the northerly intersection of Alexander Court and Main Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

C) CHARTER OAK

1. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Charter Oak and Wine Train Railroad Tracks thence easterly 180 feet along the north side of Charter Oak.

2. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Charter Oak and Wine Train Railroad Tracks thence easterly 197 feet along the south side of Charter Oak.

3. Commencing at the east intersection of Allison Avenue and Charter Oak thence along both sides of Charter Oak Avenue to the easterly end of the street.

D) CHILES AVENUE

1. Beginning at a point lying 84 feet westerly of the northwest bridge abutment corner at Pope Street crossing Sulphur Creek; thence northwesterly 58 feet along the east curb at Chiles Avenue and Pope Street.

2. Beginning at a point lying 154 feet westerly of the northwest bridge abutment corner at Pope Street crossing Sulphur Creek; thence northerly 84 feet along the west curb at Chiles Avenue and Pope Street.

E) CHURCH STREET

1. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Church Street and Hunt Avenue thence southerly along the east side of Church Street to the northeasterly intersection of Pope Street.

2. West side of Church Street five (5) feet north and five (5) feet south of the entrance and exit driveway of the parking lot of the business located at 1120 Pope Street.

F) COLLEGE AVENUE

1. Twenty feet of red painted curb in front of fire hydrant #870 (hydrant is located on east side of College Avenue, 170 feet south of intersection with Pope Street) per California Vehicle Code 22514. North of the red curb for fire hydrant, will commence 45 feet of "Police Parking Only", designated by two painted parking boxes on the roadway (22.5 feet in length) with diagonal striping and "Police Parking Only" painted within the center of each box. "Police Parking Only." signage adjacent to parking.

No parking on east side of College Avenue north of designated Police Parking to intersection with Pope Street. North (approximately 106 feet) of the "Police Parking Only" the east shoulder shall remain and be posted "No Parking", to allow the fluid movement of vehicular traffic.

Agenda Item #10.2.

2. Commencing at the southwest intersection of College Avenue and Pope Street thence southerly 360 feet along the west side of College Avenue.

G) DOWDELL LANE

1. Commencing at the east right-of-way of the Wine Train crossing at Dowdell Lane thence easterly 180 feet along the north and south side of Dowdell Lane.

2. Commencing at the driveway to 899 Dowdell Lane thence 12 feet in both the easterly and westerly direction from the edge of said driveway a distance of 12 feet along the northerly side of Dowdell Lane.

3. DOWDELL AND MCCORMICK
a. Commencing at the southeast intersection of McCormick Street and Dowdell Lane thence 25 feet northwesterly along the east side of McCormick Street.
b. Commencing at the southeast intersection of McCormick Street and Dowdell Lane thence 28 feet northeasterly along the south side of Dowdell Lane.

H) EDWARDS STREET

1. Commencing at the southeast corner of Edwards Street and Hunt Avenue thence southerly 20 feet along the east side of Edwards Street.

2. Commencing at the southwest corner of Edwards Street and Hunt Avenue thence southerly 20 feet along the west side of Edwards Street.

I) EL BONITA AVENUE

1. Commencing at a point 35 feet west of Community Drive thence westerly 60 feet along the north side of El Bonita Avenue.

2. Commencing at the intersection of El Bonita Avenue and Community Drive thence easterly 80 feet along the south side of El Bonita Avenue.

J) ELMHURST AVENUE

1. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Elmhurst Avenue and Granger Way thence easterly 30 feet along the north side of Elmhurst Avenue.

2. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Elmhurst Avenue and Spring Mountain Road thence easterly 75 feet along the south side of Elmhurst Avenue.

Agenda Item #10.2.

3. Commencing at the intersection of Elmhurst Avenue and Main Street thence westerly 30 feet along Elmhurst Avenue and thence northerly 60 feet along Main Street.

K) FULTON LANE

1. Commencing at the northeast and southeast intersection of Fulton and Main Streets thence easterly 90 feet along the north and south sides of Fulton Lane.

2. Commencing at the easterly intersection of Fulton Lane and Railroad Avenue thence easterly 120 feet along both the north and south sides of Fulton Lane.

L) GRAYSON AVENUE

1. South side of Grayson Avenue from the southwest intersection of Main Street and Grayson Avenue westerly for a distance of 100 feet.

2. North side of Grayson beginning at a point 665 feet westerly of the westerly line of Main Street then west along the north side of Grayson for a distance of 1,165.6 feet between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Mon. - Fri.

3. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Grayson Avenue and Crane Avenue thence easterly 50 feet along the north side of Grayson Avenue.

This is a 24-hour “No Stopping zone.

4. Commencing at a point 50 feet north of the northeast intersection of Grayson Avenue and Crane Avenue thence 700 feet along the north side of Grayson Avenue. This is a “No Stopping” zone during the hours of 7:30 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. on school days.

5. Commencing at the intersection of the easterly driveway of the Primary School Parking Lot and Grayson Avenue thence westerly along the southerly curb line a distance of 25 feet.

6. Class II Bike lane only, which would require parking to be prohibited along the south side. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Grayson Avenue and South Crane Avenue thence 700 feet easterly along the south side of Grayson Avenue.

M) GROVE COURT

1. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Grove Court and Hunt Avenue thence northerly 205 feet along the east side of Grove Court.

2. Commencing 100 feet northerly of the northwest intersection of Grove Court and Hunt Avenue thence northerly 100 feet along the west side of Grove Court adjacent to the heritage oak tree.

Agenda Item #10.2.

N) HUNT AVENUE

1. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Hunt Avenue and Starr Avenue thence westerly 307 feet along the north side of Hunt Avenue.

2. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Hunt Avenue and Starr Avenue thence westerly 465 feet along south side of Hunt Avenue to 105 feet west of Monte Vista extended center line.

3. Commencing at a point 20’ east of the southeast intersection of Hunt Avenue and Monte Vista thence easterly 44’ along the south side of Hunt Avenue.

4. Commencing at the southeast corner of Hunt Avenue and Edwards Street thence easterly 40 feet along the south side of Hunt Avenue.

5. Commencing at the southwest corner of Hunt Avenue and Edwards Street thence westerly 30 feet along the south side of Hunt Avenue.

6. Commencing on the north side of Hunt Avenue fifteen (15) feet west and fifteen (15) feet east of the most eastern entrance and exit driveway of the Safeway parking lot. This is a 24-hour “No Stopping Zone”.

7. Commencing at a point fourty (40) feet east of the most eastern entrance and exit driveway of the Safeway parking lot, thence thirty (30) feet along the north side of Hunt Avenue.

O) JUNE LANE

1. Commencing at a point lying 184 feet north of the intersection of Chiles and June Lane; thence along the east curb to the right a distance of 30 feet to the south curb of Hunt Avenue.

2. Commencing at a point lying 184 feet north of the intersection of Chiles Avenue and June Lane; thence along the west curb to the left a distance of 30 feet to the south curb of Hunt Avenue.

P) KEARNEY STREET

1. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Kearney Street and Spring Street thence northerly along the east side of Kearney Street to Tainter Street.

2. Commencing 143 feet north of the northeast corner of Adams Street and Kearney Street thence northerly a distance of 51 feet along the east side of Kearney Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

3. Commencing 399 feet north of the northeast corner of Adams Street and Kearney Street thence northerly a distance of 33 feet along the east side of Kearney Street.

Q) LA FATA STREET

1. Commencing 215 feet southerly from the southeast corner of La Fata Street and Dowdell Lane thence 60 feet southerly along the easterly curb of La Fata Street.

2. Commencing 398 feet southerly from the southeast corner of La Fata Street and Dowdell Lane thence 40 feet southerly along the easterly curb of La Fata Street.

3. Commencing at the driveway to 899 Dowdell Lane located on La Fata Street thence 12 feet in both the northerly and southerly direction from the edge of said driveway a distance of 12 feet along the westerly side of La Fata Street.

R) LIBRARY LANE

1. Commencing at the north side of the white painted load zone at the St.

Helena Library at 1480 Library lane, then twenty-one (21) feet along the east side of Library Lane.

S) MADRONA AVENUE

1. Commencing at the intersection of Madrona and Oak Avenues thence easterly and westerly along the north and south sides of Madrona Avenue 20 feet from each intersection.

2. Commencing at the northwest and southwest intersections of Madrona Avenue and Main Street thence westerly 90 feet along the north and south side of Madrona Avenue.

T) MAIN STREET

1. Commencing at the intersection of Main Street and Madrona Avenue thence southerly 155 feet along both sides of Main Street.

2. Commencing at the intersection of Main Street and Madrona Avenue thence northerly 155 feet along both sides.

3. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Main Street and Sulphur Springs Avenue thence 310 feet southerly along the west side of Main Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

4. Commencing at Main Street and the Sulphur Creek bridge thence southerly to Sulphur Springs Avenue along both sides of Main Street and northerly 175 feet to Mitchell Avenue along the west side of Main Street.

5. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Mitchell Drive thence northerly 20 feet.

6. Commencing at the intersection of Main Street and Spring Street thence 25 feet southerly along the west side.

7. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Main Street and Adams Street thence southerly 50 feet along the east side.

8. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Main Street and Adams Street 120 feet southerly to the point of beginning thence southerly 37 feet along the east side.

9. Commencing at the intersection of Main Street and Hunt Avenue thence northerly and southerly 30 feet along the east side.

10. Commencing at the intersection of Main Street and Spring Street 145 feet northerly to a point of beginning thence northerly 22 feet along the east side.

11. Commencing at the Main Street crosswalk at the south line of Spring Street thence southerly 24 feet along the east side of Main Street.

12. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Adams Street thence northerly 35 feet along the west side.

13. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Main Street and Adams Street thence southerly 40 feet along the west side.

14. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Spring Street 540 feet northerly to a point of beginning thence northerly 30 feet along the west side.

15. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Spring Street 230 feet northerly to a point of beginning thence northerly 90 feet along the west side.

16. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Spring Street thence northerly 40 feet along the west side.

17. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Elmhurst 400 feet to a point of beginning thence northerly 330 feet along the west side of Main Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

18. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Main Street and Pope Street thence southerly 170 feet along the east side of Main Street.

19. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Main Street and Pine Street thence south a distance of 28 feet along the east side of Main Street.

20. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Main Street and Pine Street thence south a distance of 28 feet along the west side of Main Street.

21. West side of Main Street from a point one hundred (100) feet south of Grayson Avenue southerly a distance of one thousand six hundred ninety (1,690) feet.

22. East side of Main Street from the south line of Grayson Avenue southerly a distance of one thousand five hundred eighty-five (1,585) feet.

23. East side of Main Street beginning at a point one thousand five hundred eighty-five (1,585) feet south of the south line of Grayson Avenue, southerly for a distance of two hundred eighteen (218) feet between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m.

24. East side of Main Street beginning at a point one thousand eight hundred three (1,803) feet south of the south line of Grayson Avenue, southerly for a distance of two hundred seventy-two (272) feet.

25. West side of Main Street from the northwest corner of Main Street and Grayson Avenue approximately 85 feet across the frontage of A&W Restaurant located at 501 Main Street.

26. Commencing at the southwest corner of Main Street and the York Creek Bridge thence south 360 feet along the west side of Main Street.

27. Commencing at the northeast corner of Pratt Avenue and Main Street thence north along the west side of Main Street to the York Creek Bridge

28. Commencing at a point 45 feet north of the northeast intersection of Main Street and Pope Street thence north 29 feet along the east side of Main Street.

29. Commencing at Deer Park Road south along both sides of Main Street to the York Creek Bridge.*
*The area in the Tunnel of Trees is a “No Stopping” zone on both sides of Main Street.

30. Commencing at a point 99 feet west of the northwest intersection of Main Street and Pine Street thence 22 feet west along the north side of Pine Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

31. Commencing at the southwest corner of Main Street and Charter Oak extending westerly 50 feet on the south side of Charter Oak. This is a 24 Hour “No Parking” Zone.

32. Commencing at the intersection of Main Street and Elmhurst Avenue thence southerly 30 feet along the west side of Main Street.

33. Commencing at the intersection of Main Street and Elmhurst Avenue thence northerly 60 feet along the west side of Main Street.

34. Commencing at a point 25 feet south of the southeast intersection of Britton Way thence southerly 88 feet along the east side of Main Street.

This is a “No Parking” zone and reserved for transit buses.

U) McCORMICK AVENUE

1. Commencing at the southwest intersection of McCormick Street and Dowdell Lane 170 feet southerly to a point of beginning thence southerly 15 feet along the west side of McCormick Street.

2. Commencing at the southwest intersection of McCormick Street and Dowdell Lane 310 feet southerly to a point of beginning thence southerly 30 feet along the west side of McCormick Street.

3. Commencing at the northwest intersection of McCormick and Vintage Streets 320 feet northerly to the point of beginning thence northerly 25 feet along the west side of McCormick Street.

4. Commencing at the southwest intersection of McCormick Street and Dowdell Lane 530 feet southerly to the point of beginning thence 20 feet southerly along the east side of McCormick Street.

5. Commencing at the southwest intersection of McCormick Street and Dowdell Lane 270 feet southerly to the point of beginning thence 50 feet southerly along the east side of McCormick Street.

V) MITCHELL DRIVE

1. Commencing at the southwesterly intersection of Mitchell Drive and St.

James Drive thence westerly along the south side of Mitchell Drive to the southeast intersection of North Crane and Mitchell Drive and easterly 300 feet.

2. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Mitchell and Main Street thence 80 feet westerly along the south side of Mitchell Drive.

3. Commencing 230 feet west of the intersection of Main Street and Mitchell Drive thence 88 feet westerly along the south side of Mitchell Drive.

Agenda Item #10.2.

4. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Mitchell Drive and Oak Avenue thence 50 feet westerly along the northerly side of Mitchell Drive.

5. Commencing at the easterly corner of the most easterly intersection of Mitchell Drive and St. James Drive, thence ninety (90) feet along the south side of Mitchell Drive.

W) MONTE VISTA AVENUE

1. Commencing at the cul de sac northerly of Hunt Avenue thence around the perimeter of the 25 foot diameter island.

X) OAK AVENUE

1. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Oak Avenue and Hillview Place thence southerly 65 feet.

2. Commencing at the northeast, northwest, and southwest intersections of Oak Avenue and Pine Street thence 20 feet northerly and southerly along the east and west sides of Oak Avenue.

3. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Oak Avenue and Pine Street thence 30 feet southerly along the west side of Oak Avenue.

4. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Oak Avenue and Adams Street thence northerly 18 feet.

5. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Oak Avenue and Tainter Street 55 feet southerly to a point of beginning thence southerly 20 feet on the west side of Oak Avenue.

6. Commencing at a point easterly of the southwest intersection of Oak Avenue and Tainter Street thence southerly 22 feet along the east side of Oak Avenue at the crosswalk.

7. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Oak Avenue and Spring Street thence northerly 20 feet along Oak Avenue.

8. Commencing at the point of curvature of the southeasterly curve on the east side of Oak Avenue thence southeasterly 160 feet to the point of tangency with the north side of Mitchell Drive.

9. Beginning at a point 339 feet north of Spring Street extending northerly to a point 419 feet on the east side of Oak Avenue.

10. Beginning at the northwest corner of Oak Avenue and Tainter Street thence extending northerly 35 feet on Oak Avenue.

Agenda Item #10.2.

11. Twenty (20) feet southerly from the driveway at 1255 Oak Avenue.

Y) PINE STREET

1. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Pine Street and Main Street thence along the north side of Pine Street to Oak Avenue excepting a 25 foot yellow zone terminating 180 feet from the northeast intersection of Pine Street and Oak Avenue.

2. Commencing at the northwest and southwest intersections of Pine Street and Oak Avenue thence westerly 20 feet.

3. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Pine Street and Oak Avenue thence easterly 20 feet.

4. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Pine Street and Main Street thence westerly 10 20 feet.

5. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Pine Street and Main Street thence easterly 115 feet.

6. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Pine Street and Main Street easterly 140 feet.

Z) PINOT WAY

1. Commencing at the centerline of the utility and pedestrian access alley that connects Pinot Way to Sylvaner Avenue thence southwesterly 10 feet and northeasterly 10 feet creating a 20 foot long segment centered on the end of the alley.

AA) POPE STREET

1. Commencing at the southeast and northeast intersections of Pope Street and Main Street thence east 80 feet to the Wine Train railroad rightof-way.

2. Commencing at the east terminus of Pope Street at the Napa River thence westerly along Stonebridge Park 345 feet on the north side of Pope Street.

3. Commencing at the northeast corner of Paseo Grand Drive and Pope Street then easterly 154 feet on the north side of Pope Street.

4. Commencing at the east terminus of Pope Street at the Napa River thence westerly 400 feet along the south side of Pope Street.

5. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Pope Street and College Avenue thence 340 feet easterly along the south side of Pope Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

6. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Pope Street and College Avenue thence 680 feet westerly along the south side of Pope Street.

7. Commencing at the intersection of Pope Street and College Avenue thence easterly 680 feet on the north side of Pope Street.

8. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Pope Street and Church Street thence easterly 35 feet along the north side of Pope Street.

9. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Pope Street and the Napa Valley Wine Train Tracks thence easterly 25 feet along the south side of Pope Street.

10. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Pope Street and the Napa Valley Wine Train Tracks thence easterly 145’ to the intersection of Pope Street and Church Street.

11. Commencing at the Northeast intersection of Pope Street and Chiles Ave thence easterly 950 feet along the north and south sides of Pope Street.

12. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Pope Street and Starr Avenue thence westerly 392 feet along the north side of Pope Street.

AB) PRATT AVENUE

1. Commencing at the southeastern intersection of Pratt Avenue and the Napa Valley Wine Train and thence easterly a distance of 570 feet along the south shoulder of Pratt Avenue.

2. Commencing at the northeastern intersection of Pratt Avenue and Main Street and thence easterly a distance of 300 feet along the north shoulder of Pratt Avenue.

AC) RAILROAD AVENUE

1. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Railroad Avenue and Adams Street thence 31 feet north along the west side of Railroad Avenue.

2. Commencing at a portion 400 feet north of the northeast corner of the intersection of Adams Street and Railroad Avenue thence north a distance of 50 feet along the east side of Railroad Avenue.

3. Commencing at the south exit of the City Parking lot on Railroad Avenue thence south a distance of 16 feet.

4. Commencing at the north side of the south exit of the City Parking lot on Railroad Avenue thence north a distance of 24 feet.

5. Commencing at the north exit of the City Parking lot on Railroad Avenue thence north a distance of 20 feet.

Agenda Item #10.2.

6. Commencing at the north exit of the City Parking lot on Railroad Avenue thence south a distance of 15 feet.

7. Commencing at the curb beginning at the Napa Valley Wine Train tracks at the northeast corner of the intersection of Adams Street and Railroad Avenue northward through the curb return and thence northerly a distance of 281 feet along the east side of Railroad Avenue.

AD) SILVERADO TRAIL

1. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Howell Mountain Road and Silverado Trail thence south 400 feet along the east side of Silverado Trail.

AE) SOUTH CRANE AVENUE

1. Commencing at the southeast intersection of South Crane Avenue and Grayson Avenue thence southerly 50 feet along the east side of South Crane Avenue. This is a 24-hour “No Stopping” zone.

2. Commencing at a point 433 feet south of the southeast intersection of South Crane Avenue and Grayson Avenue thence southerly 30 feet along the east side of South Crane Avenue. This is a “No Stopping” zone during the hours of 7:30 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. on school days.

3. Commencing at the northeast intersection of South Crane Avenue and Grayson Avenue thence northerly 50 feet along the east side of South Crane Avenue. This is a 24-hour “No Stopping” zone.

4. Commencing at a point 50 feet north of the northeast intersection of South Crane Avenue and Grayson Avenue thence northerly 450 feet along the east side of South Crane Avenue to the bridge. This is a “No Stopping” zone during the hours of 7:30 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. on school days.

5. Class II Bike lanes only, which would require parking to be prohibited along the east side. Commencing at the southeast intersection of Grayson Avenue and South Crane Avenue thence 800 feet southerly along the east side of South Crane Avenue.

6. Class II Bike Lanes only, which would require parking to be prohibited along the west side. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Grayson Avenue and South Crane Avenue thence 800 feet southerly along the west side of South Crane Avenue.

AF) SPRING STREET

1. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Spring Street and Main Street thence westerly 35 feet along the north side of Spring Street.

Agenda Item #10.2.

2. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Spring Street and Main Street westerly 120 feet to a point of beginning thence westerly 30 feet along the north side of Spring Street.

3. Commencing at the shopping center driveway at the intersection of Spring Street and Money Way thence 15 feet westerly and 65 feet easterly along the south side of Spring Street.

4. Commencing at the northeast and the southeast intersections of Spring Street and Oak Avenue thence 33 feet easterly along Spring Street.

5. Commencing at the northwest and southwest intersections of Spring Street and Oak Avenue thence 33 feet westerly along Spring Street.

6. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Spring Street and Oak Avenue westerly 70 feet to a point of beginning thence westerly 70 feet along the south

7. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Spring Street and Oak Avenue westerly 25 feet to a point of beginning thence westerly 50 feet along the south side.

8. Commencing at the intersection of Spring Street and Kearney Street thence easterly 60 feet along the south side.

9. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Spring Street and Kearney Street 70 feet westerly to a point of beginning thence 60 feet westerly along Spring Street.

10. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Spring Street and East Sylvaner 135 feet westerly to a point of beginning thence 70 feet westerly along Spring Street.

11. Twenty (20) feet on both sides of driveway at 2322 Spring Street.

12. Twenty (20) feet on west side of driveway and that strip on the easterly side to adjacent driveway at 1428 Spring Street.

13. Twenty (20) feet east from the west driveway and twenty (20) feet from both sides of the east driveway at 1343 Spring Street.

14. Ten (10) feet from both sides of the driveway to the parking lot east of the building at 1313 Spring Street.

15. Commencing on the southwest intersection of Spring Street and Valley View thence southwesterly along the south side of Spring Street to the southeast intersection of West Sylvaner Avenue.

Agenda Item #10.2.

16. Class II Bike lanes only, which would require parking to be prohibited along the south side. The vehicle travelway (centerlane) would not be striped.

AG) SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD

1. Commencing at the southeast corner of Spring Mountain Road and Elmhurst Avenue thence 75 feet southerly along the east side of Spring Mountain Road.

AH) STARR AVENUE

1. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Starr Avenue and Harvest Lane thence 285 feet northerly along the west side of Starr Avenue.

2. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Harvest Lane and Starr Ave. northerly 45 feet to a point of beginning thence northerly 150 feet to the southeast corner of Meadowcreek Circle along the east side of Starr Avenue.

3. Commencing at the extended center line of Meadowcreek Circle (north) thence 22 feet south along the west side of Starr Avenue.

4. Commencing at the northeast intersection of Meadowcreek Circle (south) and Starr Avenue 83 feet northerly to a point of beginning thence northerly 32 feet to the south side of Hunt Avenue.

AI) STOCKTON STREET

1. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Stockton Street and Spring Street thence northerly along the west side of Stockton Street to the Madrona Street and Stockton Street intersection.

AJ) SULPHUR SPRINGS AVENUE

1. Commencing at the southwest intersection of Main Street and Sulphur Springs Avenue thence 50 feet westerly along the south side of Sulphur Springs Avenue.

2. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Sulphur Springs westerly 253 feet to a point of beginning thence westerly 23 feet along the north side of Sulphur Springs Avenue.

3. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Main Street and Sulphur Springs westerly 289 feet to a point of beginning thence westerly 15 feet along the north side of Sulphur Springs Avenue.

AK) SYLVANER AVENUE
Agenda Item #10.2.

1. Commencing at the centerline of the utility and pedestrian access alley that connects Sylvaner Avenue to Pinot Way thence southwesterly 10 feet and northeasterly 10 feet creating a 20 foot long segment centered on the end of the alley.

AL) TAINTER STREET

1. Commencing at the intersection of Tainter Street and Kearney thence easterly along the south side of Tainter Street to the intersection of Oak Avenue and Tainter Street except Mon.-Fri. 7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.

2. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Tainter Street and Kearney Street thence 80 feet easterly along the north side of Tainter Street.

3. South side of Tainter Street between Stockton Street and Kearney Street.

AM) VINTAGE AVENUE

1. Commencing at the northwest intersection of Vintage Avenue and McCormick Street westerly 228 feet to a point of beginning thence 12 feet west of said driveway 168 feet along the north side to the Napa Valley Wine Train right-of-way.

2. Commencing at the intersection of Vintage Avenue and McCormick Street westerly 250 feet to a point of beginning thence westerly 180 feet along the south side.

AN) VOORHEES CIRCLE

1. Commencing at the westerly intersection of Voorhees Circle and Mitchell Avenue south of Mitchell and west of Voorhees Circle thence southerly along the west side, easterly along the south side and northerly along the east side a distance of 1100 feet to the easterly intersection of Voorhees Circle and Mitchell Avenue.

AO) McCorkle Avenue

1. Commencing at the southwest driveway entrance, 5 feet of red curb at 710 McCorkle Avenue.

2. Commencing at the northeast driveway entrance, 5 feet of red curb at 710 McCorkle Avenue.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024 by the following vote:

Agenda Item #10.2.

Mayor Dohring: __________
Vice Mayor Hall: __________
Councilmember Kenealy: __________
Councilmember Chouteau: __________
Councilmember Summers: __________
APPROVED: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.2.

Agenda Item #10.2.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Planning
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Maya DeRosa, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Consideration and Proposed Approval of a Resolution Extending the Waiving of Sign Fees for Businesses

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached
resolution.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

On June 27, 2023, the City Council approved the waiver of all sign permit fees for a 12 month period, expiring on June 30, 2024.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

To remove financial burden of the cost of permitting a new or updated sign in the City and encourage investment.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Due to the limited number of sign permit applications the City receives, the loss of sign permit and building permit revenue for the upcoming fiscal year is not expected to have a significant financial impact. The annual financial impact is estimated to be $4,500.

BACKGROUND:

On October 12, 2021, the City Council approved a resolution temporarily waiving sign permit fees in support of encouraging business recovery in the community during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The program was extended in July of 2022 and June 2023 due to a need to reduce economic barriers for new businesses. Though the pandemic is over, the impacts are still lingering combined with the uncertainty of the financial markets making investing less enticing. Staff has prepared this item to request the City Council's consideration of a further extension of the waiving of sign permit fees.

DISCUSSION:

The City Community Development Department administers and processes sign permits.

The current fee for a minor sign permit is $500 and the fee for signs requiring Planning Commission approval (major sign permit) is $1,000, which does not include the required building permit fee. Since many businesses are still trying to recover from the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and fears or a financial recession it is recommended that all sign related fees continue to be waived for an interim period of time through June 30, 2025, including the associated building permit fees and public hearing notice fees. Business owners needing a new or revised sign would still need to complete a sign permit application and comply with the applicable sign code zoning standards.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Not a CEQA project.

Agenda Item #10.3.

GOAL:

Miscellaneous/Other
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution final 6-25-2024
Agenda Item #10.3.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
RESOLUTON OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. HELENA

WAIVING ALL FEES RELATED TO SIGN PERMITS THROUGH
JUNE 30, 2025 OR UNTIL ADOPTION OF UPDATED MASTER

FEE SCHEDULE, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST

RECITALS
A. The City desires to continue to foster economic growth and investment in the City; and
B. Due to COVID-19 and the associated residual economic impacts to businesses in the City, there is a need for the City to reduce economic burdens through eliminating various application fees; and C. The City is aware that the costs to obtain a sign permit in relation to the cost of the sign are burdensome for businessowners; and
D. Eliminating all sign fees and related building permit fees for signs through June 30, 2025 or until an updated Master Fee Schedule is adopted (whichever occurs first) would benefit economic recovery in the City and create incentive for new businesses to locate in St. Helena; and E. The continued temporary waiving of sign fees is consistent with the Business Recovery Strategy to stimulate new investment downtown; and

RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:

The City Council approves the waiving of all sign related fees through June 30, 2025 or until the adoption of an updated Master Fee Schedule, whichever occurs first.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024, by the following vote:

Agenda Item #10.3.

Mayor Paul Dohring:

Vice Mayor Eric Hall:

Council Member Anna Chouteau:

Council Member Lester Hardy:

Council Member Billy Summers:

APPROVED: ATTEST:

Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.3.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Finance
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Consideration and Proposed Adoption of a Resolution Adopting a list of Projects for Fiscal Year 2024-25 funded by SB1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

The purpose is to approve the Fiscal Year 2024-25 project list funded by SB1: The Road Repair and Accountability
Act of 2017.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no additional financial impact with the adoption of the resolution approving the RMRA Project List for FY
2024-25.

BACKGROUND:

On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. SB 1 increases per gallon fuel excise taxes; increases diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to tax rates in future years. A percentage of the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) account funding is apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2032(h) for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system.

Prior to receiving an apportionment of RMRA funds in FY 2024-25, the City is required to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded in FY 2024-25 by July 1, 2024. The list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds shall include:
 A description of the project;
 The location of each proposed project;
 A proposed schedule for the project’s completion; and  The estimated useful life of the improvement.

DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item #10.4.

The City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the RMRA. This is the fifth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1. The City is recommending continuing the Downtown Sidewalk and Pedestrian Project and the Napa Valley Vine Trail: Gap Closure Yountville to St.

Helena Project on the FY 2024-25 project list.

SB 1 requires the City to provide an annual general fund Maintenance of Effort (MOE) in the amount of $314,571. However, the MOE specific expenditures do not need to be reflected in the approved project list. The proposed FY 2024-25 Capital Improvements Plan Budget and proposed FY 2024-25 Operations Budget will include a total of $379,189 in General Funds for City Streets to meet the MOE requirement of both SB 1 and Measure T funding.

The recommended action to adopt the project list will ensure the City continues to receive SB 1 revenues. It is anticipated that the City will receive approximately $132,300 during FY 2024-25. The SB 1 funds do carryover from year to year and any unused funds can be spent on other City funded projects in accordance with local needs and priorities so long as the projects are consistent with SB 1 and adopted by City Council.

Staff recommends that City Council approve the SB 1 street project list for FY 2024-25 in order to meet the July 1, 2024 deadline.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

None.

GOAL:

Goal 2: Improve Infrastructure & Further Environmental Sustainability DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit A - SB1 Project List
Resolution - SB 1 Project List
Agenda Item #10.4.

Project Details
Start Complete Min Max
Downtown
Sidewalk and
Pedestrian
Project -
Phase I
This project will include: Project includes
design and construction of the downtown
sidewalk and pedestrian improvement
project. Improvements include replacing
sidewalks, curb ramps, bulb outs, landscape
and utilites. | Project has been delayed due
to the pandemic, staffing vacancies, and
funding requirements
Main Street (Highway 29)
from Mitchell Drive to Pine
Street
PreConstructionCarried Over
23/24
06/2023 09/2025 15 30 4 3
Napa Valley
Vine Trail:

Yountville to
St. Helena
This project will include: Cost Estimating,
Preliminary Design | Project will include
design and construction of the Napa Valley
Vine Trail. Improvements include the
installation of pedestrian and bicycle
facilities through the City of St. Helena
corridor.

Main Street, Oak Avenue,
and Railroad Avenue in
City of St. Helena.

PreConstructionCarried Over
23/25
06/2023 06/2025 15 30 4 3
Assem Senate
Est. Schedule Useful Life
Title Description Location Component
Priority
Status
Agenda Item #10.4.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2024/25 FUNDED BY SB1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017.

RECITALS
A. Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
B. SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and C. The City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
D. The City, will receive an estimated $132,300 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2024- 25 from SB 1; and
E. This is the seventh year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
F. The City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and G. The funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate streets, roads, bridges, add active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year and similar projects into the future; and
H. The 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in an at-risk condition and this revenue will Agenda Item #10.4.

help the City increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a good to excellent condition; and I. The SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials, and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide; and J. The project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1, which exempts the operation, leasing, or minor alteration of existing facilities.

RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct; and

2. The following list of previously proposed projects in Exhibit “A” will be funded inpart or solely with fiscal year 2024/25 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024, by the following vote:

Mayor Dohring: __________
Vice Mayor Hall: __________
Councilmember Chouteau: __________
Councilmember Kenealy: __________
Councilmember Summers: __________
APPROVED: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.4.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Public Works
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Telstar for control system integration and SCADA automation upgrades for
the Water Treatment Plant as part of CIP Project Number W18-113 for a not to exceed contract of $206,889 and
authorize the Public Works Director to approve up to 10% contingency.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Approve the attached Resolution.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

On February 9, 2021, the City contracted with Telstar for upgrades to the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system at the Water Treatment Plant to replace
the Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), which were
obsolete and no longer supported by the manufacturer.

The scope included upgrading the outdated and conflicting hardware with the software and upgrading the software
that was also no longer being supported.

On November 28, 2023, the Council again authorized
execution of a contract with Telstar to perform SCADA
system programming for valve control technology
improvements in conjunction with the purchase and
installation of filter valve automation cards.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

Authorize a professional services agreement to perform
control system integration and automation upgrades to the SCADA system at the Water Treatment Plant.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total fiscal impact is for a not-to-exceed amount of $227,578. FY 2024-25 Adopted budget for project W18-
113 is $160,000 and $67,578 will be funded with unspent funds from FY24 in the Water Enterprise Fund 561. Staff recommends increasing the CIP budget in FY 2024-25 by
$67,578 and decreasing the FY 2025-26 CIP budget by
$67,578. The modification will enable the project to move forward faster, leading to better efficiencies and earlier improvements in water quality.

Agenda Item #10.5.

BACKGROUND:

The City's current Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is semi-automated through a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system which operates using two existing Siemens Simatic TI545 PLC at the facility: one at the Master Control Panel (MCP) and one at the Filter Control Panel (FCP). The system was initially commissioned in the 1970's and the equipment is reaching the end of its useful life. The adopted Five Year Capital Improvement Program includes Project No. W18-113 which is a full upgrade and automation of the SCADA system at a total budgeted cost of $800,000. This is the first phase of that project.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed Professional Services Agreement (Attachment B) and the corresponding quote from Telstar (Attachment C) includes the necessary electrical and programming upgrades necessary to program automated efficiencies into the SCADA system for centralized digital control for the following five different plant processes:

1. Chemical Treatment Room - Installation of connections between the POLC panel, the chemical feed pumps, the variable frequency drives and motors.

2. Backwash Return System - Procure, install and program new magnetic flow meter to connect to the existing backwash return piping

3. Raw Water pit - Replacement of two actuated ball valves and associated connections to the PLC.

4. Filter Building - Replacement and programming of a new Allen-Bradley variable frequency drive (VFD)

5. PAC Tank - Install and program new submersible level transmitter for the PAC Tank. program programming integration of the two existing pumps to operate based on influent flow and install a new solenoid valve for the carrier water system which will allow the carrier water system to be stopped when the plant is shut down, or if there is a loss of flow.

The automation of the water treatment plant process is both an efficiency measure but also one that will assist with improving the quality of water treatment and delivery to utility customers. CIP Project W18-113 includes updates to the SCADA system for the water treatment plant as well as other water sources such as the Rutherford and Homes system to ensure fully remote monitoring and controls of all water systems. Additional information regarding the extent of the needed SCADA improvements will be known with the receipt of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment anticipated to be received in July 2024. Staff collaborated with the Condition Assessment consultant to review the proposal to ensure it consistent with the proposed, but not finalized recommendations and they did concur this is one of the top recommended actions.

Telstar is the contractor that wrote the program we currently use to control and monitor the WTP system. They are a state-certified instrumentation and controls integrator specializing in SCADA/PLC systems, measurement instrumentation, and automated process controls. Telstar Provides complete design, installation, on-site maintenance and calibration services for all brands of controls and instrumentation. Founded in Agenda Item #10.5.

1981, Telstar provides efficient, cost-effective solutions for SCADA and other automation projects of any size, throughout California. Their team of highly trained and experienced professionals will keep our project within budget and on time, with minimal to zero downtime. Telstar is the City's on-call SCADA support vendor.

The total cost of the programming upgrade is a not-to-exceed cost of $206,889, which includes programming and automation integration of 5 different processes into the existing SCADA system. CIP Project W18-113 has a total project budget of $800,000.

Staff is also requesting authorization to approve up to 10% contingency for unplanned/unknown required programming to complete the project for a total not-toexceed the cost of $227,578. Also, staff is requesting to authorize transfers to the Water CIP fund 763 to fund the project from FY 2024 Water Treatment capital equipment in the amount of $67,578.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a CEQA project.

GOAL:

Goal 2: Improve Infrastructure & Further Environmental Sustainability Goal 3: Pursue Water Security & Sustainable Management of Water Resources Goal 7: Enhance Organizational Effectiveness
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution Telstar Equipment EOY v1
-Attachment A CIP project W18-113
Attachment B Telstar Scope of Work
Agenda Item #10.5.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION No. 2024-

ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TELSTAR FOR CONTROL

SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND SCADA AUTOMATION UPGRADES FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT AS PART OF CIP PROJECT NUMBER W18-113 FOR A NOT TO EXCEED CONTRACT OF $206,889 AND AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO APPROVE UP TO A 10% CONTINGENCY

RECITALS
A. The City's current Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is semi-automated through a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system which operates using two existing Siemens Simatic TI545 PLC at the facility: one at the Master Control Panel (MCP) and one at the Filter Control Panel (FCP).

B. The system was initially commissioned in the 1970's and the equipment is reaching the end of its useful life.

C. The adopted Five Year Capital Improvement Program includes Project No. W18- 113 which is a full upgrade and automation of the SCADA system at a total budgeted cost of $800,000. This is the first phase of that project.

D. The automation of the water treatment plant process is both an efficiency measure but also one that will assist with improving the quality of water treatment and delivery for our utility customers.

E. CIP Project W18-113 includes updates to the SCADA system for the water treatment plant as well as other water sources such as the Rutherford and Homes system to ensure fully remote monitoring and controls of all water systems.

F. The proposed Professional Services Agreement includes the necessary electrical and programming upgrades necessary to program automated efficiencies into the SCADA system for centralized digital control for the following five different plant processes:
a. Chemical Treatment Room - Installation of connections between the POLC panel, the chemical feed pumps, the variable frequency drives and motors.
b. Backwash Return System - Procure, install and program new magnetic flow meter to connect to the existing backwash return piping c. Raw Water pit - Replacement of two actuated ball valves and associated connections to the PLC.
d. Filter Building - Replacement and programming of a new Allen-Bradley variable frequency drive (VFD)
e. PAC Tank - Install and program a new submersible level transmitter for the PAC Tank. program programming integration of the two existing pumps to operate based on influent flow and install a new solenoid valve for the carrier water system which will allow the carrier water system to be stopped when the plant is shut down, or if there is a loss of flow.

Agenda Item #10.5.

RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the city council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

2. The total cost of the programming upgrade is a not to exceed cost of $206,889 which includes programming and automation integration of 5 different processes into the existing SCADA system.

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement to perform control system integration and automation upgrades to the SCADA system at the Water Treatment Plant for a not to exceed cost of $206,889 and authorize the Public Works Director to approve up to a 10% contingency.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024, by the following vote:

Mayor Paul Dohring: ______
Vice Mayor Eric Hall: ______
Council Member Anna Chouteau: ______
Council Member Patrick Kenealy: ______
Council Member Billy Summers: ______
APPROVED: ATTEST:
____________________________ _______________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.5.

Agenda Item #10.5.

Contractor License #422364
Contractor DIR #1000000899
CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION • INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
SCADA/AUTOMATION • PLC/HMI • ELECTRICAL • CALIBRATION • MAINTENANCE 1717 Solano Way, Unit 34, Concord, CA 94520 Phone 925-671-2888, Fax 925-671-9507 4017 Vista Park Court, Sacramento, CA 95834 Phone 916-646-1999, Fax 916-646-1096 202 South Douty Street, Hanford, CA 93230 Phone 559-584-7116, Fax 559-584-8028

June 13, 2024
Michele Ferrell
[email protected]
City of St. Helena
410 Crystal Springs Rd, St. Helena, CA 94574
City of St. Helena Main Treatment Plant PLC Mods
30-42892
Drawings: N/A
Specifications: N/A
Dear Michele,
Telstar Instruments (“Telstar”) is pleased to provide a quote for the referenced project to the above identified purchaser (“Customer”). This proposal covers the work needed at the Chemical Treatment Room, Raw Water Pit, Filter Building, and PAC Tank.

By accepting this proposal from Telstar you agree to treat this as confidential information.

SCOPE OF SUPPLY / SERVICES

1. Chemical Treatment Room.
a. Telstar will procure and install the final interconnects between the existing PLC panel and the chemical feed pumps, VFDs, and motors.
b. Telstar is not responsible for procuring and installing the new VFDs and enclosures housing the VFDs.
c. Telstar will provide programming and integration of the new VFDs to the existing SCADA.
d. Telstar is under the assumption that there are spare I/O and terminals blocks for this project. Telstar will not be procuring or installing new I/O cards and terminals blocks. e. Telstar will provide start up and testing of the new system to ensure the VFDs and pumps are operating to the correct calculations required by plant personnel. f. Telstar will furnish and install new magnetic flow meters for the carrier water, caustic soda, and liquid alum system.
i. Magnetic flow meter for carrier water system, qty. 1. ii. Magnetic flow meters for each caustic soda pump, qty. 2. iii. Magnetic flow meter for both liquid alum pumps, qty. 1.

Agenda Item #10.5.

Contractor License #422364
Contractor DIR #1000000899
CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION • INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
SCADA/AUTOMATION • PLC/HMI • ELECTRICAL • CALIBRATION • MAINTENANCE

g. Telstar will furnish and install new conduit and wiring for each flow meter. Programming will be provided to integrate new flow meters and commands for pumping operation.

2. Backwash Return System
a. Telstar will demo the existing insertion paddle flow meter and the section of piping that houses the existing flow meter.
b. Telstar will procure and install a new 6” magnetic flow meter with flange adapter to connect to the existing backwash return piping. This magnetic flow meter is readily available.
c. Telstar will provide programming and integration of the new magnetic flowmeter to the existing SCADA.
d. Telstar will provide start up and testing of the new magnetic flow meter.

3. Raw Water Pit.
a. Telstar will demo existing valves, and will furnish and install two new actuated ball valves.
i. 2” actuated ball valve, qty. 1.
ii. ¾” actuated ball valve, qty. 1.
b. Telstar will furnish and install new conduit and wiring from the main building to the raw water pit using the existing piping trench if an existing conduit route is not available.

Termination to PLC and programming will also be provided and tested to SCADA.

4. Filter Building.
a. Telstar will demo the existing defective Toshiba VFD. Telstar will furnish and install a new Allen-Bradley VFD. Programming for the VFD will be provided.

5. PAC Tank
a. Telstar will furnish and install a new submersible level transmitter for the PAC Tank.

Telstar will furnish and install new conduit and wiring for the submersible level transmitter to the existing VFD panel. Using existing conduit from the VFD panel, Telstar will run wiring from the VFD panel to the main building. Termination to PLC and programming will be provided.
b. Telstar will provide programming to integrate the two existing pumps to operate based on influent flow.
c. Telstar will furnish and install new conduit, wiring, and terminals blocks to provide 120V power to the existing convenience receptacle within 30’ of the VFD panel. d. Telstar will demo the existing solenoid valve, and will furnish and install a new solenoid valve for the carrier water system. This will allow the carrier water system to be stopped when the plant is shut down, or if there is a loss of flow.

Agenda Item #10.5.

Contractor License #422364
Contractor DIR #1000000899
CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION • INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
SCADA/AUTOMATION • PLC/HMI • ELECTRICAL • CALIBRATION • MAINTENANCE

Lump Sum Pricing for the Chemical Treatment Room...........................................................$79,085.00 Lump Sum Pricing for the Backwash Return System .............................................................$18,900.00 Lump Sum Pricing for the Raw Water Pit .............................................................................$46,662.00 Lump Sum Pricing for the Filter Building ..............................................................................$23,094.00 Lump Sum Pricing for the PAC Tank .....................................................................................$39,148.00 Lump Sum Pricing for the Scope Provide Above .................................................................$206,889.00 Shipping and Handling for Telstar Supplied Materials IS INCLUDED Sales Tax IS INCLUDED
This quotation is based on Customer’s representation that this IS a prevailing wage project.

CLARIFICATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND EXCLUSIONS
a. Material price is valid for seven (7) days from date referenced on this quote (Refer to COVID clause RE: MATERIAL PRICING AND DELIVERY under Terms and Conditions) b. This quotation is based on the inclusion of Telstar’s standard Terms and Conditions as part of any purchase order, contract or other agreement.
c. Telstar’s quotation includes only those items listed above. Requests for additions/deletions from our scope will require a change in the quoted price. d. Telstar assumes no responsibility for performance, applicability, compatibility, start-up, testing, or acceptance of any equipment not furnished by Telstar under this proposal. e. Telstar is supplying only equipment specified and noted above. f. Please reference the above stated quote number in all correspondence and purchase orders.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Base Terms: Quotation is valid for 30 days from the date of Telstar’s quotation. Payment is due and payable 30 days from date of invoice. If payment is not received by the 30th day, a .05% daily service charge (18-3/4% per annum) will be charged on all accounts past due. In the event of a dispute concerning payment, attorney's fees, court costs and costs of collection will be paid to the prevailing party. The cost for permits and bonding are excluded unless expressly referenced in Telstar’s quotation. Our standard insurance applies unless agreed to in writing by Telstar.

Telstar’s standard one year parts only warranty applies to this quotation. All other warranties, express or implied, or referenced elsewhere in contract documents are excluded, including but not limited to implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for purpose. Unless expressly stated in Telstar’s estimate, this quote is based on standard straight time hours and does not include any prevailing wage rates. The price quoted herein is for the labor and materials specifically listed within the body of this quote. Service calls are charged at a 4-hour minimum per person, Agenda Item #10.5.

Contractor License #422364
Contractor DIR #1000000899
CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION • INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
SCADA/AUTOMATION • PLC/HMI • ELECTRICAL • CALIBRATION • MAINTENANCE

excluding travel time. Unless expressly stated in the quotation, training, operation and maintenance manuals, and preparation of as built drawings are excluded from Telstar’s scope of work.

Limitation of Liability: (a) In no event shall Telstar, its suppliers or subcontractors be liable for special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages, whether in contract, warranty, tort, negligence, strict liability or otherwise, including, but not limited to, loss of profits or revenue, loss of use of the Equipment or any associated equipment, cost of capital, cost of substitute equipment, facilities or services, downtime costs, delays, and claims of customers of Customer, its officers, directors, members employees or any third parties for any damages. Telstar’s liability for any claim whether in contract, warranty, tort, negligence, strict liability, or otherwise for any loss or damage arising out of, connected with, or resulting from this Agreement or the performance or breach thereof, or from the design, manufacture, sale, delivery, resale, repair, replacement, installation, technical direction of installation, inspection, operation or use of any equipment covered by or furnished under this Agreement, or from any services rendered in connection therewith, shall in no case exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the purchase price allocable to the Equipment, part or Services that is the subject of the claim. (b) All causes of action against Telstar Instruments arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the performance or breach hereof shall are deemed barred unless brought within one year from the date of discovery or other accrual. (c) In no event, regardless of cause, shall Telstar Instruments be liable for liquidated damages, offsets or penalties of any kind or to indemnify, defend or hold harmless Customer, its officers, directors, members, employees or any third party, arising from or related to the Equipment and/or Services provided by Telstar.

Force Majeure: Telstar shall neither be liable for loss, damage, detention or delay nor be deemed to be in default for failure to perform when prevented from doing so by causes beyond its reasonable control including but not limited to acts of war (declared or undeclared), Acts of God, fire, strike, labor difficulties, acts or omissions of any governmental authority or of Customer, compliance with government regulations, insurrection or riot, embargo, delays or shortages in transportation or inability to obtain necessary labor, materials, or manufacturing facilities from usual sources or from defects or delays in the performance of its suppliers or subcontractors due to any of the foregoing enumerated causes. In the event of delay due to any such cause, the date of delivery will be extended by period equal to the delay plus a reasonable time to resume production, and the price will be adjusted to compensate Telstar Instruments for such delay.

Cancellation: In the event of cancellation by Customer, Customer agrees to fully reimburse and compensate Telstar for all costs associated with this Quotation or subsequent order, including but not limited to engineering, labor, materials, quote and estimating time, and product return fees, plus a ten percent (10%) markup to compensate for disruption in scheduling, planned production, indirect costs and profit. Payment for cancellation shall be due within ten (10) days from the date of submission of charges by Telstar.

Entire Agreement: This Quotation constitutes the entire agreement between Telstar and Customer. There are no agreements, understandings, restrictions, warranties, or representations between Telstar and Customer other than those set forth herein or herein provided. This Quotation may only be amended, changed or revised by a written amendment signed by an authorized representative of Telstar. No oral or implied agreements shall be of any force or affect.

Precedence: In the event Telstar is issued an authorization for work, Purchase Order, Contract or similar Agreement with conflicting Terms and Conditions than those set forth herein, these Terms and Conditions will take precedence and will supersede any and all other conflicting Terms and Conditions.

Submittals: In the event Telstar receives a Notice to Proceed or a written statement to proceed with submittals, Telstar will be entitled to compensation based on percent of completion of submittal cost to Customer. Telstar will prepare only one set of submittals, and any resubmittals shall be subject to an additional charge for engineering time and other costs in preparing re-submittals.

Prevailing Wages: Customer must promptly inform Telstar when a project will be registered on the Department of Industrial Relations. Customer must inform Telstar if Certified Payroll Reports are required to be submitted to Customer. If Customer requests Certified Payroll Reports beyond four weeks in arrears, Customer may be charged an administrative processing fee of $50.00 per week generated for said reports.

Agenda Item #10.5.

Contractor License #422364
Contractor DIR #1000000899
CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION • INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
SCADA/AUTOMATION • PLC/HMI • ELECTRICAL • CALIBRATION • MAINTENANCE

Authorized Signers: Only the following authorized signers of Telstar have the complete legal authority to bind contractual documents: Robert S. Marston (President/Secretary), John D. Gardiner (Vice President/Treasurer), Tammy Misenhimer (Contract Administrator). If a document is signed by an unauthorized signer, the document will be void and unenforceable.

Industry Material Pricing and Delivery: Telstar is unable to hold prices on materials for more than 7 days. Prices for plastic, copper, steel, and other commodities fluctuate daily. Our vendors and manufacturers are experiencing unprecedented delays due to current industry labor shortages, shortage of containers, port congestion, and raw material shortages, that have extended lead times significantly. Telstar reserves the right to amend the delivery date and pricing of materials set forth in this quotation. Telstar considers any of the above related changes imposed by our vendors and manufacturers as outside its reasonable control and subject to Force Majeure provisions.

Insurance: Telstar’s standard insurance limits will apply.

Open Shop: Telstar is an Open Shop contractor and will not be signatory to any unions.

We look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at the phone number below.

Sincerely,
Jacob Gardiner
Project Engineer
Telstar Instruments
(916) 646-1999
Agenda Item #10.5.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Public Works
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
SUBJECT: Approval of a Resolution approving and authorization to purchase SMART Advanced Meter Infrastructure from
Badger Meter, Inc. to replace all existing utility meter infrastructure for a not to exceed cost of $1,056,966.44 as budgeted for CIP Project W24-04 Smart Meter
Deployment.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Approve the attached Resolution.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

May 28, 2024 - City Council authorized a Professional
Services Agreement with Haley Aldrich Inc. for engineering services and project management support to procure and
replace all City water meters as part of CIP Project W24- 04 SMART Meter Deployment.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

To approve the purchase of SMART Advanced Meter
Infrastructure from Badger Meter, Inc. for CIP Project
W24-04 Smart Meter Deployment.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: CIP Project W24-04 has approved funding of $1.97 Million.

Cost for this action is as follows:

Item Cost
Meter Purchase $967,475.00
Sales Tax $79,816.69
Shipping & Contingency $9,674.75
TOTAL COST: $1,056,966.44
It is anticipated, as documented in the Council action taken on May 28, 2024, that this project will be funded via bond proceeds.

BACKGROUND:

St. Helena’s adopted 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes Project W24- 04 Smart Meter Deployment. The scope of Project W24-04 replaces or retrofits all existing water meters with state-of-the-art ultrasonic SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). AMI enables remote transmission of water usage data directly to the City and an online portal via a cellular network. This means that both City staff and water customers will have access to real-time water usage information, providing invaluable insight into water consumption patterns, trends, and costs.

Agenda Item #10.6.

DISCUSSION:

AMI represents a significant advancement in St. Helena’s modernization of its domestic water purveyance system. AMI provides St. Helena with the ability to remotely capture continuous, consistently accurate, water usage data and billing information from every meter in St. Helena’s water purveyance system.

SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)
SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), meter-reading technology, provides the most accurate, and least labor-intensive measurement of water usage. SMART AMI meter reading technology is a continuous, automatic, cellular, data gathering (meter reading) technology. SMART meter reading technology provides “real-time” data for both purveyor and citizen utilization.

Water use data is gathered utilizing the Orion cellular network that is provided and maintained by Orion, a Badger subcontractor. St. Helena will not need to provide nor maintain any of the cellular infrastructure for this project. Badger performs a cellular coverage test of the Orion system in St. Helena before offering the SMART AMI option.

Badger provides a map of the subject area showing the predicted cellular signal strength based on Orion’s cellular coverage. Badger’s cellular coverage map shows strong signal strength for the entirety of St. Helena’s water service area.

The availability of continuous meter data provides St. Helena and citizens the ability to discern system leaks within short timeframes and with minimal water loss. The real time data also provides users with the information necessary to revise their water use to optimize water availability and possibly reduce their usage cost. This project will improve water conservation, allow increased customer understanding of water use, and will provide the City’s water customers with more immediate notifications of water use and alerts regarding abnormal water use or unintended use such as leaks.

Without implementation of Project W24-04, St. Helena and its residents will continue to experience challenges associated with receiving water usage data as part of the bimonthly billing cycle and not "real-time" meter reads. Additionally, staff will continue to spend additional time each month "re-reading" anywhere from 70 - 100 meters each month due to the age and incompatibility.

Based on the cellular coverage analysis, the City and Badger Meter do not anticipate any coverage “holes,” or issues. When the project is complete, the City will operate a fully functional and scalable cellular AMI system.

Retrofitting and Replacing Existing Meters
Project W24-04 has a two-fold benefit for St. Helena. To take full advantage of AMI technology, all of the City’s existing water meters need to be either upgraded or replaced to work within the SMART AMI system. St. Helena currently has 2,675 meters in its purveyance system. Eight hundred and sixty-nine (869) of those meters are ten (10) or fewer years old. Eighteen hundred and six (1,806) are eleven (11) years old, or Agenda Item #10.6.

older. The seven (7) oldest meters currently in use are between twenty-six (26) and thirty (30) years old.

The typical service life of a disc water (current technology) meter is 15-years with a maximum service life of 20-years. Any water meter currently in St. Helena’s system will be required to be upgraded with a new register, an antenna to communicate over the Orion cellular network, and a new water box lid that is manufactured from materials that will not interfere with a radio signal and has a recessed receptacle to accept the new communications antenna without causing a tripping hazard.

Public Works intends to retrofit the 869 meters that are ten or fewer years old.

Alternatively, Public Works intends to replace the 1,806 meters that are 11-years old or older with new E-series Ultrasonic water meters. Unlike current disc-meter technology ultrasonic water meters have no internal moving parts that deteriorate with age and cause inaccuracies (typically lower readings) in capturing the true volume of water delivered to the customer. Ultrasonic meter technology is considered “state-of-the art” and will ultimately replace disc-meter technology. Since the meters that are 11 or more years old are nearing the end of their service lives, it makes financial sense to replace those meters now instead of retrofitting them and replacing them in another five years.

Replacing the older meters will also allow St. Helena to recapture any lost revenue that may be occurring from inaccuracies of the older disc-style meters. The new Ultrasonic meters are provided with the correct register to work within the SMART AMI system. An antenna and new box lid will be required for these Ultrasonic meter installations.

Badger Meter’s quotation for the material to retrofit the 869 meters and replace the 1,806 meters is a $967,475.00 as shown in Attachment 2. The quote in Attachment 2 does not include the replacement of meter box lids. Given the importance of ensuring clear transmission of RF signals for the new SMART AMI, it is imperative that all castiron or concrete lids be replaced with a more RF-friendly material lid designed to accept the antenna without being a tripping hazard. The anticipated budget to purchase the appropriate RF-friendly box lids is $240,750.00. Badger does not manufacture nor distribute the lids.

Purchase of the necessary box lids and the award of a contract to install upgrades to the existing meters, or install new meters, will be the subjects of a future requests for Council actions.

Special equipment/supplies, sole-source purchases, and bid exceptions St. Helena exclusively utilizes Badger water meters as the City’s standard water meter.

Utilizing a single manufacturer allows the overall system to operate efficiently and in the case of SMART meter technology to “talk” to the overall data gathering system so that consistent and accurate water use data is collected from each meter in the system.

Badger meters were initially selected as the exclusive meter of choice for our utility because of the reputation of quality and the longer than average product life span.

Continued usage of this product is recommended due to the compatibility with our Agenda Item #10.6.

existing accounting and billing software system as well as the phased approach that is required to install all meters. Having two different meters communicating with our utility billing service for several different billing cycles will cause hundreds of hours of additional staff time not only with the configuration but also forcing manual reads until the full system has been upgraded.

Exclusively utilizing Badger as St. Helena’s meter provider means that purchasing meters from Badger falls under Section 3.04.140 of the St. Helena Municipal Code as stated below. Historically, St. Helena purchased Badger meters through National Meter Company, a Badger distributor. National Meter was purchased by Badger when the founders/owners of National Meter retired and National is now Badger Meter Co.

St. Helena Municipal Code Section 3.04.140 – Special equipment/supplies, sole source purchases, and bid exceptions - Section A provides the purchasing officer or department head the ability to limit bidding to a specific product type, or brand name product or utilize a request for proposal approach where warranties, servicing obligations, and product performance will be evaluated in addition to the price of the product when purchases of special equipment or supplies need to be compatible with existing equipment, or to perform complex or unique functions. Additionally, Section B Sole Source Purchases, allows for sole source purchases of commodities or services that can be obtained from only one vendor, or one distributor authorized to sell in this area. Section B states “Commodities or services that can be obtained from only one vendor, or one distributor authorized to sell in this area, are exempt from the competitive bidding requirements in Section 3.04.100 and are deemed sole source purchases. Sole source purchases may include proprietary items sold direct from the manufacturer. All sole source purchases shall be supported by written documentation indicating the facts and nature supporting the determination of a sole source, signed by the appropriate department head and forwarded to the purchasing officer. Approval of any sole source acquisition shall be obtained from the city council for an award of a contract or purchase order greater than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00).” ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a CEQA project.

GOAL:

Goal 2: Improve Infrastructure & Further Environmental Sustainability Goal 3: Pursue Water Security & Sustainable Management of Water Resources Goal 8: Implement Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) Projects Miscellaneous/Other DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution sole source purchase Smart Meters
58 TO 8 E-SERIESTWIST 5'SHEILDCFCELL-C (EXPIRES 123124) Executed - City of St. Helena SS
Agenda Item #10.6.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION No. 2024-

APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF SMART ADVANCED METER INFASTRUCTURE FROM BADGER METER, INC.

FOR CIP PROJECT W24-04 SMART METER DEPLOYMENT

RECITALS
A. Water meters currently in use are experiencing significant issues, with readings being inaccurate up to 30% of the time.

B. Included in the approved 5- Year CIP program is a project to update current water meters to SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure.

C. SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure will assist in eliminating the inaccuracies and uncertainties associated with the current ageing meters. The SMART meters will provide real-time data on water usage, enabling the city to better serve our community and enhance the City’s water management capabilities.

D. In effort to expeditiously implement this effort, City approved the execution of a contract with the on-call engineering firm Haley and Aldrich for owner’s representative, and construction observation of Project W24-04.

E. City proposes the authorization of the sole purchase of SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure from Badger Meter Inc for CIP Project W24-04.

F. Authorizing the purchase will allow the City to adhere to project projection completion date within the fiscal year.

RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the city council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

2. Approve the purchase of SMART Advanced meter infrastructure from Badger Meter Inc for CIP Project W24-04 SMART Meter Deployment.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024, by the following vote:

Mayor Paul Dohring: ______
Vice Mayor Eric Hall: ______
Council Member Anna Chouteau: ______
Council Member Patrick Kenealy: ______
Council Member Billy Summers: ______
Agenda Item #10.6.

APPROVED: ATTEST:
____________________________ _______________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.6.

Badger Meter Inc.
4545 W Brown Deer Road Milwaukee WI 53223
PO Box 245036 Milwaukee WI 53224-9536
Created Date 05-24-2024
To Scott Alman

CITY OF ST HELENA
1572 RAILROAD AVE

ST HELENA
California 94574
Customer ID 00002223
Pricing Effective Dates 05-15-2024 -
12-31-2024
Salesperson Proposal Subject Shipping Terms / INCO Terms Payment Terms 005307 KATHY RICHARDS  5/8" TO 8" E-SERIES/TWIST 5'/

SHEILD/CF/CELL-C (EXPIRES
12/31/24)

FCA FACTORY
NET 30 DAYS
Line # Description Qty Unit Net Price
USD
Line Totals
USD
1 BMI Part No.: 108-4490
Cat String: EB-EAC-PXTX-E5-CA-19FD-K1Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 5/8"x3/4"(7-1/2), Thk Wshr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.001 FT3, TS-568, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD, 1466  198.00  290,268.00
2 BMI Part No.: 110-9771
Cat String: EB-EBA-PXTX-E5-CA-19FD-K2Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 3/4" (7-1/2), Thk Wshr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.001 FT3, TS-729, SN Yr 9D and PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
2  218.00  436.00
3 BMI Part No.: 113-1540
Cat String: EB-ECA-PXTX-E5-CA-19FD-K3Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 1"(10-3/4), Thk Wshr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.001 FT3, TS-766, SN Yr 9D and PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
221  256.00  56,576.00
4 BMI Part No.: 104-4278
Cat String: EU-EDA-PXXX-E5-CA-19GD-A5Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series SS, 1-1/2" EL(13), Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.01 FT3, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
39  604.00  23,556.00
5 BMI Part No.: 104-0405
Cat String: EU-EEA-PXXX-E5-CA-19GD-A6Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series SS, 2" EL(17), Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.01 FT3, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
42  812.00  34,104.00
6 BMI Part No.: 104-0406
Cat String: EB-EFC-PXXP-E5-CA-19GD-E3Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
1  2,260.00  2,260.00
Domestic Quotation
Quotation No. 3633781
Thank you for your business!
Estimated ship dates subject to change based upon component availability, as a result of global supply chain constraints, or credit review.

This acknowledgment is made subject to the terms & conditions found on our web-site: https://www.badgermeter.com/terms-and-conditions.

Terms and conditions related to service units, training, and professional services can be found here: https://badgermeter.com/service-units-terms-and-conditions

Agenda Item #10.6.

Line # Description Qty Unit Net Price
USD
Line Totals
USD
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 3" RND(12), TP Prsr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.01 FT3, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
7 BMI Part No.: 104-4279
Cat String: EB-EFD-PXXP-E5-CA-19GD-E3Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 3" RND(17), TP Prsr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.01 FT3, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
5  2,298.00  11,490.00
8 BMI Part No.: 104-4280
Cat String: EB-EGD-PXXP-E5-CA-19GD-E4Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 4" RND(20), TP Prsr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.01 FT3, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
14  2,795.00  39,130.00
9 BMI Part No.: 106-4221
Cat String: EB-EHD-PXXP-E5-CA-19HD-E6Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 6"x24" RND Prsr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.1 FT3, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
13  4,411.00  57,343.00
10 BMI Part No.: 108-8641
Cat String: EB-EJB-PXXP-E5-CA-19HD-E8Y2-XXT2-XX-B0A
Description:

E-Series B-Alloy, 8"x20" RND, TP Prsr, Enc, 4CXN2 ORION, 9D-0.1 FT3, SN Yr 9D & PBB, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD,
3  5,138.00  15,414.00
11 BMI Part No.: 111-4217
Cat String: R4-BA1-E1CA-2B1-9FD-NX-XX-T2-XX-B0A
Description:

REG 4, M25, HR-E LCD, 4CXN2 ORION, PL Lid/Shrd-GRY, Trx Scrw, 9D-0.001 FT3, SN YR 9D in, TT CblShld-5', BMI STD, 24 PACK, 869  79.50  69,085.50
12 BMI Part No.: 103-9055
Cat String: E4-4E-AM-AG-T1AA-B0A
Description:

EP Only, For Enc, ORION CELL C, Thru Ld Instl Kit, TT CblShld-8in, BMI STD,
2675  137.50  367,812.50
Subtotal - USD  967,475.00
Estimated Freight Charges 0.00
Total Price - USD  967,475.00
Notes and Assumptions
If applicable, sales tax and freight, if included on the proposal, is an estimate and will be recalculated based on rates and tax status in effect at the time of invoicing.

To expedite the order entry process, please ensure the following is noted on your purchase order: billing address, shipping address, purchase order number, quantity, price, payment terms, quotation number, and the vendor is listed as Badger Meter, Inc.

Please send all purchase orders to the contact that prepared this quotation for you.

Domestic Quotation
Quotation No. 3633781
Thank you for your business!
Estimated ship dates subject to change based upon component availability, as a result of global supply chain constraints, or credit review.

This acknowledgment is made subject to the terms & conditions found on our web-site: https://www.badgermeter.com/terms-and-conditions.

Terms and conditions related to service units, training, and professional services can be found here: https://badgermeter.com/service-units-terms-and-conditions

Agenda Item #10.6.

Actual lead time to be provided at time of order.

Badger Meter provides certification files to help manage meter and endpoint inventory and to maintain meter accuracy data. The standard method of delivery for this format is via electronic mail. Any deviations from our standard format, or any custom file formats, will be considered on a time and material basis.

Due to continuous improvements and redesign of Badger Meter products and technology solutions, Badger Meter reserves the right to provide our newest product solutions as an alternative to the proposed products provided they are in conformance with the requirements of the specifications and do not exceed the prices quoted.

Domestic Quotation
Quotation No. 3633781
Thank you for your business!
Estimated ship dates subject to change based upon component availability, as a result of global supply chain constraints, or credit review.

This acknowledgment is made subject to the terms & conditions found on our web-site: https://www.badgermeter.com/terms-and-conditions.

Terms and conditions related to service units, training, and professional services can be found here: https://badgermeter.com/service-units-terms-and-conditions

Agenda Item #10.6.

E-Series Ultrasonic® Meters, Recordal® Disc Meters, Recordall Compound Series/Combo Meters, Recordall Turbo Series Meters, HR-E® Encoders, HR-E LCD Encoders, BEACON® SaaS, BEACON Mobile Reading Solutions and ORION® Endpoints
May 24, 2024
Mr. Joseph Leach
Principal Engineer
City of St. Helena
1572 Railroad Ave.

St. Helena, CA 94574
RE: Sole Source Letter
Dear Mr. Leach:

This letter will confirm that Badger Meter is the sole source of E-Series Ultrasonic® Meters, Recordal® Disc Meters, Recordall Compound Series/Combo Meters, Recordall Turbo Series Meters, HR-E® Encoders, HR-E LCD Encoders, BEACON® SaaS, BEACON Mobile Reading Solutions and ORION® Endpoints for City of St. Helena.

In the event you have any questions regarding this correspondence, we can be reached by telephone at 800-876-3837 or by email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
BADGER METER, INC.

Charla D. Dury
Assistant Secretary and Proposal Lead

Agenda Item #10.6.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Public Works
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing Bid Advertisement for CIP Project W24-04 SMART Meter
Deployment.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Adopt the attached Resolution.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

June 13, 2023 - City Council adopted 5-Year CIP which
included Project W24-04.

May 28, 2024 - City Council and the St. Helena Financing Authority authorized the installment sale of bonds which stated the first series of bonds is anticipated to fund, among other items, SMART meters project.

Also proposed on the June 25, 2024 City Council agenda
is consideration and proposed approval of a Resolution
approving the purchase of SMART Advanced Meter
Infrastructure from Badger Meter, Inc. for CIP Project
W24-04 Smart Meter Deployment.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

Authorize the Bid Advertisement for CIP Project W24-04
SMART Meter Deployment.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. There is no fiscal impact associated with authorizing staff to issue bid advertisements. CIP Project W24-04 has approved funding of $1.97 million.

BACKGROUND:

During the City Council Meeting held on June 13, 2023, the comprehensive Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) was officially adopted. This significant plan encompasses a range of crucial projects aimed at enhancing the City of St. Helena’s infrastructure and services.

One notable inclusion in the CIP is Project W24-04 SMART Meter Deployment (the “Project”), which focuses on leveraging cutting-edge technology to improve accuracy and efficiency in the City’s water monitoring and billing system. Many of the meters in the St. Helena system have been exceeded their useful life and result in sporadic and unreliable generation of data. Regrettably, this unreliability has resulted in inaccurate readings being reported, with discrepancies occurring up to 30% of the time and the Agenda Item #10.7.

likelihood of lost revenue for water consumption. This ongoing issue not only undermines the efficiency of the City’s operations but also poses a significant challenge in accurately monitoring water usage and billing. To mitigate the impact of these inaccuracies, City staff have been required to conduct duplicate and triple readings, consuming valuable time and resources. Considering these concerns, this Project holds immense potential to streamline operations and enhance service to customers.

DISCUSSION:

To address the issues the City is experiencing with the current water meters, Project W24-04 proposed transitioning from current disc technology to SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). This technology enables remote transmission of water usage data directly to the City and online portal via a cellular network. AMI offers a host of benefits including real-time data collection, improved accuracy, and the ability to remotely monitor and manage water usage. However, to fully leverage the benefits of the SMART Metering Technology, its essential that all existing water meters within the City’s service area be upgraded or replaced.

After careful assessment and consideration, City staff developed a plan to ensure the continued efficiency and reliability of the City’s water meters. The City’s current water meter infrastructure and billing software is manufactured by Badger Meter. Given the existing relationship and integration, acquiring the necessary infrastructure from Badger Meter is the most cost-effective and efficient approach for the Project. As part of this plan, all meters between the ages of 1 and 10 years will undergo retrofitting to enhance their performance and extend their lifespan. Meters aged 10 years and older will be replaced to ensure optimal functionality and accuracy. In total, we anticipate retrofitting 869 meters and replacing 1,806 meters as part of this project. By taking proactive measures to address aging infrastructure, we aim to improve accuracy and main a high level of service for the community.

To expedite the implementation of the Project, the City will issue bonds and utilize the proceeds to fund the project. The city will repay the bond cost, over time, with revenue generated by the increase in water rates. This funding approach allows the City to address crucial infrastructure needs promptly and efficiently while spreading the financial responsibility across the community in a fair and sustainable matter.

Upon authorization to advertise for bids, Staff will finalize the contract documents and begin soliciting bids from potential contractors in preparation for construction activities to commence in July 2024 and terminate June 2025. This timeline allows City to adhere to City’s projected completion date within the fiscal year.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a CEQA Project.

GOAL:

Goal 2: Improve Infrastructure & Further Environmental Sustainability Agenda Item #10.7.

Goal 3: Pursue Water Security & Sustainable Management of Water Resources Goal 8: Implement Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) Projects Miscellaneous/Other DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution Smart Meter Bid Authorization
smart meter w24-04 project
Agenda Item #10.7.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION No. 2024-

APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BID ADVERTISEMENT FOR CIP PROJECT W24-04 SMART METER DEPLOYMENT.

RECITALS
A. Water meters currently in use are experiencing significant issues, with readings being inaccurate up to 30% of the time.

B. Included in the approved 5- Year CIP program is a project to update current water meters to SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure.

C. SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure will assist in eliminating the inaccuracies and uncertainties associated with the current ageing meters. The SMART meters will provide real-time data on water usage, enabling the city to better serve our community and enhance the City’s water management capabilities.

D. In effort to expeditiously implement this effort, City approved the execution of a contract with the on-call engineering firm Haley and Aldrich for owner’s representative, and construction observation of Project W24-04.

E. City proposes the authorization of the purchase of SMART Advanced Metering Infrastructure from Badger Meter Inc for CIP Project W24-04.

F. Additionally, the city also needs a contractor to install the infrastructure to all utility customers.

RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the city council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

2. Authorize staff to issue bid documents to solicit vendors to install above named equipment for CIP Project W24-04 SMART Meter Deployment.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024, by the following vote:

Mayor Paul Dohring: ______
Vice Mayor Eric Hall: ______
Council Member Anna Chouteau: ______
Council Member Patrick Kenealy: ______
Council Member Billy Summers: ______
Agenda Item #10.7.

APPROVED: ATTEST:
____________________________ _______________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.7.

Agenda Item #10.7.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Public Works
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Lesley Milton, Interim Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations
SUBJECT: Approval of a Resolution authorizing Amendment No. 7 to STH Contract: FY2021-048 in the amount of $140,000 with Operational Technical Services for a total amount not-toexceed of $3,584,005 for temporary Water Treatment Plant operators.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Adopt the attached Resolution.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

Table 1: Water Treatment Plant - STH Contract FY2021-048 Date Resolution
1/26/2021 n/a
3/23/2021 2021-37
1/25/2022 2022-3
2/22/2022 2022-15
8/9/2022 2022-74
4/25/2023 2023-32
10/10/2023 2023-135

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

Approval of Amendment #7 to STH Contract FY2021-048 for continued Water Treatment Operations Staffing.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: The FY 2024-2025 Adopted budget includes an appropriation of $140,000 in the Water Operations Fund 561 for this contracted service. Amendment No. 7 to Professional Services Agreement STH 2021-048 requests authorization
to use $140,000 of the budgeted funds, and no additional funds are necessary at this time.

BACKGROUND:

Water Treatment Plant Staffing Agreement (STH Contract: FY2021-048) On January 26, 2021, the City and OTS entered into an initial agreement in an amount not-to-exceed $25,000 to provide temporary staffing assistance for the vacancy of the City's Chief Water Plant Operator (CPO) position. At the time the initial agreement with OTS was signed, the City had two full-time plant operators and an active recruitment for the CPO. One plant operator had a T3 Certification and the other plant operator had a T2 Certification. Since the execution of the initial OTS agreement, it became necessary to increase the scope and contract amount with OTS due to the subsequent resignations of the City’s T3 and T2 shift operators leaving the City with three approved Agenda Item #10.8.

but vacant positions at the Water Treatment Plant, which were under recruitment. The continued to need for assistance with temporary plant operations was necessary to remain in compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board until these positions are filled.

The CPO oversees the water treatment facilities in accordance with the State of California Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The SWRCB requires the CPO possess a valid Grade 4 (T4) Water Treatment Operator Certification and all shift operators (WTO) are required to possess a valid Grade 3 (T3) Certification. OTS is able to provide the City with a temporary CPO who possess at least a Grade 4 SWRCB Water Treatment Operator Certification. Additionally, each temporary Senior WTO will possess a minimum SWRCB Grade 3 Water Treatment Certification.

Since the execution of the original agreement, the City has continued to face difficulties in filling these positions and has continued need to utilize OTS services resulting in 6 additional amendments to the original contract as noted in Table 2. In good news, on June 17, 2024 the City successfully hired a permanent Water Treatment Plant Operator.

This contract is only for the one remaining operator position that we intend to fill prior to December 2024.

Table 2 - STH Contract: FY 2021-048 Amendments
STH FY2021-048
(WTP) Date Approved Contract Value Not-To-Exceed Cost
Contract Execution January 26, 2021 $25,000 $25,000
Amendment #1 March 23, 2021 $409,929.58 $434,929.58
Amendment #2 January 25, 2022 $348,561 $783,491
Amendment #3 February 22, 2022 $562,614 $1,346,105
Amendment #4 August 9, 2022 $807,250 $2,153,355
Amendment #5 April 25, 2023 $490,650 $2,644,005
Amendment #6 October 10, 2023 $800,000 $3,444,005
DISCUSSION:

Staffing and recruitment at both the water and wastewater treatment plants remain a challenge. Due to the City's requirement to be in compliance with the State Water Board and the State Water Resources Control Board, it remains necessary to continue the services with contracted firm OTS until we can fill all certification required positions.

There is active recruitment for the Chief Plant Operator For Wastewater tending which is low for qualified applicants.

This item is recommending authorization to execute amendments to STH Contract: FY 2021-048 for water treatment operator services (Amendment #7 - Table 3) while the City continues recruitment efforts. Should qualified candidates be selected, the total contract value will not be utilized.

Agenda Item #10.8.

Table 3 - Water Treatment Plant - STH Contract: FY2021-048 - Proposed Amendment #7
STH FY2021-048
(WTP) Date Approved Contract Value Not-To-Exceed Cost
Contract Execution January 26, 2021 $25,000 $25,000
Amendment #1 March 23, 2021 $409,929.58 $434,929.58
Amendment #2 January 25, 2022 $348,561 $783,491
Amendment #3 February 22, 2022 $562,614 $1,346,105
Amendment #4 August 9, 2022 $807,250 $2,153,355
Amendment #5 April 25, 2023 $490,650 $2,644,005
Amendment #6 October 10, 2023 $800,000 $3,444,005

PROPOSED -
Amendment #7 June 25, 2024 $140,000 $3,584,005
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a CEQA project.

GOAL:

Goal 3: Pursue Water Security & Sustainable Management of Water Resources Goal 7: Enhance Organizational Effectiveness
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:
20240625 Draft Resolution OTS
STH Contract FY2021-048-07A OTS WTP Operators
Agenda Item #10.8.

CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO.

A Resolution of the City of St. Helena City Council Authorizing:
the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 7 to STH Contract FY2021-048 with Operational Technical Services for temporary Water Treatment Operators in the amount of $140,000 for a total amount not-to-exceed of $3,584,005 as approved in the FY24-25 Water Fund budget

RECITALS
A. On January 26, 2021, the City and Consultant entered into the Agreement for Consultant to provide professional services in connection with the project described as Temporary Water Treatment Operators with SWRCB Certification; and
B. On March 23, 2021, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $409,929.58 to STH Contract: FY2021-048 to allow Operational Technical Services to continue to provide temporary Water Treatment Operators to the City; and
C. Since the approval of Amendment No. 1 on March 23, 2021, the City incurred significant staffing costs due to unforeseen emergencies, required repair work due to again equipment, and a continued need for interim staffing which exceeded the current contract limit; and
D. On January 25, 2022, City Council approved Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $348,561 to STH Contract: FY2021-048 to bring the contract within its contract limits; and
E. On February 22, 2022, City Council approved Amendment No. 3 with OTS in the amount of $562,614, for a total amount not-to-exceed $1,346,105 to STH Contract:

FY2021-048; and
F. On August 9, 2022, City Council approved Amendment No. 4 with OTS in the amount of $807,250, for a total amount not-to-exceed $2,153,355 to STH Contract:

FY2021-048; and
G. On April 25, 2023, City Council approved Amendment No. 5 with OTS in the amount of $490,650, for a total amount not-to-exceed $2,644.005 to STH Contract:

FY2021-048; and
H. On October 10, 2023, City Council approved Amendment No. 6 with OTS in the amount of $800,000 for a total amount not-to-exceed $3,444,005 to STH Contract:

FY 2021-048; and
Agenda Item #10.8.

I. The City currently has one approved positions at the Water Treatment Plant; and J. Additional funding is necessary to allow Operational Technical Services to continue to provide temporary Water Treatment Operators to the City.

RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 7 to STH Contract: FY2021-048 with Operational Technical Services for temporary Water Treatment Operators in the amount of $140,000 for a total amount not-to-exceed $3,584,005 paid from the budgeted water fund.

Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on June 25, 2024 by the following vote:

Mayor Paul Dohring: _____
Vice Mayor Eric Hall: _____
Council Member Anna Chouteau: _____
Council Member Patrick Kenealy: _____
Council Member Billy Summers: _____
APPROVED: ATTEST:
______________________ ________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #10.8.

AMENDMENT NO. 7
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH OPERATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES; STH CONTRACT NO: 2021-048 FOR TEMPORARY WATER TREATMENT OPERATORS WITH SWRCB CERTIFICATION FOR AN ADDITIONAL $140,000 FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $3,584,005
This Seventh Amendment to Professional Services Agreement STH Contract: 2021-048 dated January 26, 2021 ("Agreement") is made as of this 25th day of June 2024 by and between the City of St. Helena, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Operational Technical Services ("Consultant").

RECITALS
A. On January 26, 2021, the City and Consultant entered into the Agreement for Consultant to provide professional services in connection with the project described as Temporary Water Treatment Operators with SWRCB Certification; and
B. On March 23, 2021, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $409,929.58 to STH Contract: FY2021-048 to allow Operational Technical Services to continue to provide temporary Water Treatment Operators to the City; and
C. Since the approval of Amendment No. 1 on March 23, 2021, the City has incurred significant staffing costs due to unforeseen emergencies, required repair work due to again equipment, and a continued need for interim staffing which exceeded the current contract limit; and D. On January 25, 2022, City Council approved Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $348,561 to STH Contract: FY2021-048 to bring the contract within its contract limits; and E. On February 22, 2022, City Council approved Amendment No. 3 with OTS in the amount of $562,614, for a total amount not-to-exceed $1,346,105 to STH Contract: FY2021-048; and F. On August 9, 2022, City Council approved Amendment No. 4 with OTS in the amount of $807,250, for a total amount not-to-exceed $2,153,355 to STH Contract: FY2021-048; and G. On April 25, 2023, City Council approved Amendment No. 5 with OTS in the amount of $490,650, for a total amount not-to-exceed $2,644.005 to STH Contract: FY2021-048; and H. On October 10, 2023, City Council approved Amendment No. 6 with OTS in the amount of $800,000 for a total amount not-to-exceed $3,444,005 to STH Contract: FY 2021-048; and I. The City currently has two approved, but vacant, positions at the Water Treatment Plant and while the City has a continued need in the interim basis until a time when the vacant positions are filled; and
J. Additional funding is necessary to allow Operational Technical Services to continue to provide temporary Water Treatment Operators to the City; and
K. The City of St. Helena and Operational Technical Services now desire to amend the Agreement.

AGREEMENT
Agenda Item #10.8.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Section 4.A Compensation and Method of Payment, is amended to read as follows:
“Total compensation shall not exceed $3,584,005…”

2. Exhibit A – Task order is amended to reflect the hourly rates as listed below, effective November 1, 2023:

POSITION

REGULAR
RATE

OVERTIME
RATE
DOUBLE
TIME
RATE

ON-CALL

STANDBY
RATE

ACTIVATED

ON-CALL
RATE
WT CPO 156 207.48 234.00 156 207.5
Lead WT Operator 145 192.85 217.50 145 192.9

3. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Entered as of the day and year first above stated.

CONSULTANT:

Signatures of Authorized Persons:

By:

Print Name:

Title:

CITY OF ST. HELENA
a Municipal Corporation
By:

Print Name: Anil Comelo
Title: City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Ethan Walsh, City Attorney
Agenda Item #10.8.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: PUBLIC HEARINGS
Department: Planning
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Maya DeRosa, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Introduction and first reading of an Ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 2024-001) to amend
Chapter 17.30 of Title 17 of the St. Helena Municipal Code regarding the calculation of housing in-lieu fees.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Introduction and waive the first reading of the proposed Ordinance to:

1. Find that the proposed changes to Chapter 17.30 of
the Zoning Code are exempt from CEQA Guideline
15061 (b)(3); and

2. Approve and adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment
(ZOA 2024-001) to amend Chapter 17.30 of Title 17
of the St. Helena Municipal Code regarding the
calculation of housing in-lieu fees.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

To amend the St. Helena Municipal Code zoning
ordinance Chapter 17.30 in order to update the
methodology for calculation of housing impact fees.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact cannot be quantified, however, it is anticipated this updated methodology of housing impact
fee calculation will yield more revenue to the Affordable Housing Impact fund.

BACKGROUND:

The City Council will be considering the approval of updated Housing Impact fees on June 25, 2024. The recommended impact fee is different than how the City currently calculates Housing Impact Fees as noted in the the zoning code Section 17.30.030E. In order to ensure the zoning code is not in conflict, on May 21, 2024, the Planning Commission considered an amendment to the zoning ordinance (ZOA 2024-001) and recommended the City Council approve the ordinance amendment (see attached ordinance).

DISCUSSION:

St. Helena Municipal Code Section 17.30.030 E provides a methodology for housing impact fee calculation which is a percentage basis of the projected construction cost of the market rate dwelling unit. After review by consultant Wildan who has been retained by the City to update all impact fees, it was recommended that the methodology be Agenda Item #11.1.

revised to charge the fee based on the new square foot floor area. The attached ordinance with noted amendments reflects the updated in- lieu fee methodology policy and is consistent with how other cities calculate housing in-lieu fees.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This ordinance is exempt from review under CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that the provisions contained herein would not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

GOAL:

Goal 1: Strengthen Financial Sustainability
Miscellaneous/Other
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Ordinance - Housing In-Lieu Fee Calculation
Agenda Item #11.1.

83578.00012\42255084.1
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. HELENA AMENDING SECTION 17.30.030.E OF CHAPTER 17.30 (AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM) OF TITLE 17 OF THE ST. HELENA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING

THE CALCULATION OF HOUSING IN-LIEU FEES
WHEREAS, Chapter 17.30 (Affordable Housing Program) of the St. Helena Municipal Code (SHMC) establishes an affordable housing program, housing impact fees on developers of nonresidential development projects in the City, inclusionary housing requirements and alternative means of compliance, requirements for inclusionary units, and administration and enforcement measured for the program; and WHEREAS, SHMC section 17.30.030 authorizes the City Council to adopt by resolution housing in-lieu fees that would be paid by residential developers as an alternative means of compliance with the inclusionary housing requirements of SHMC Chapter 17.30; and
WHEREAS, SHMC section 17.30.030.E (Calculation of Housing In-Lieu Fee) provides that the housing in-lieu fee shall be charged on a percentage basis of the projected construction costs of market rate dwelling units, as established by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City engaged with Willdan Financial Services (“Consultant”) to perform a nexus study of affordable housing impact fees needed to fund new development’s share of affordable housing induced by the household spending associated with new market rate development, and commercial linkage fees to quantify the connection between the development of commercial, office, industrial and hotel, development projects and the demand for affordable housing units; and WHEREAS, Consultant completed an “Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study” dated May 22, 2024 (“Fee Study Report”), which studies support the adoption of said fees; and
WHEREAS, the affordable housing impact fees supported by the Fee Study Report are calculated on a per square foot basis, as opposed to a percentage basis of the projected construction costs of market rate dwelling units; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend SHMC section 17.30.030.E to ensure consistency with the methodology supporting the adoption of the housing in-lieu fee as set forth in the Fee Study Report, and as authorized by SHMC section 17.30.030; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at a Regular Meeting on May 21, 2024, on the proposed Ordinance during which public hearing the Planning Commission received comments from City staff and members of Agenda Item #11.1.

83578.00012\42255084.1
the general public and recommended approval to the City Council through Resolution No. _____; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on June 25, 2024 on the proposed Ordinance, during which public hearing the City Council received comments from City staff and members of the general public; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the requested amendments to Section 17.30.030.E of the St. Helena Municipal Code through approval of this Ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of St. Helena does hereby ordain as follows:

Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated as though set forth in this section.

Section 2. Amendment. Subsection E of Section 17.30.030 of the St. Helena Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (new language is underlined, deletions are in strikeout):
“E. Calculation of Housing In-Lieu Fee. The housing in-lieu fee shall be charged on a per square foot basis for net new floor area percentage basis of the projected construction costs of market rate dwelling units. The amount and calculation of the housing in-lieu fee shall be established by resolution of the City Council. Construction costs of market rate dwelling units is determined in accordance with the definition in Section 17.32, Definitions of Terms.

Construction costs shall be separately calculated for each dwelling unit in attached single-family residential and rental residential development projects, and the appropriate fee paid for each unit within the residential project. The housing in-lieu fee required by this Section may be satisfied either by cash payment or, upon the recommendation of the Community Development Director and approval of the City Council, by an alternative which will provide the City with a value equal to or greater than the amount of the required in-lieu fee.” Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council would have passed this ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 4. CEQA. This ordinance was assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State Agenda Item #11.1.

83578.00012\42255084.1
CEQA Guidelines (the Guidelines), and the environmental regulations of the City. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance is exempt from review under CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that the provisions contained herein would not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced within thirty (30) days from and after the date of its adoption by the City Council at a second reading and shall be posted and published in accordance with the California Government Code.

THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the St.

Helena City Council on the day of , 2024, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the St. Helena City Council on the day of , 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:__________________________ APPROVED:_____________________ Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Paul Dohring, Mayor
Agenda Item #11.1.

Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: PUBLIC HEARINGS
Department: Finance
DATE: June 25, 2024
FROM: Mandy Kellogg, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolutions adopting updates to the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees and
Nonresidential/Commercial Linkage Fees.

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

Adopting updates to the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees and Nonresidential/Commercial Linkage Fees.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

November 24, 2015 - Approval of Professional Services
Agreement with Willdan Financial Services.

November 14, 2017 - Approval of Amendment #1 for
Water and Wastewater Impact Fees.

October 9, 2018 - Approval of Amendment #2 to Update
Cost Allocation Plan.

August 24, 2021 - Approval of Amendment #3 to Add
Commercial Linkage Fee Analysis.

July 25, 2023 - Approval of Amendment #4 for Additional Funding to Complete User Fee Study.

August 8, 2023 - Approval of Amendment #5 for Additional Funding to Complete the Development Impact Fee Study.

STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:

The purpose is to adopt Affordable Housing and
Commercial Linkage Fee study and implement the newly
adopted fees by September 24, 2024.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total estimated Financial Impact based on a five-year average of Affordable Housing fee revenue collections is an approximate increase in revenue collections of
$590,500 annually.

BACKGROUND:

Cities must regularly update Development Impact fees and User Fees in order to recover costs that are attributable to certain services and for which benefits accrue to specific limited number of individuals or businesses. At the current time, the City has been experiencing a gap in the revenue collected, relative to expenditures and expectations for services. There are several underfunded city operational functions, and the infrastructure, parks, roads, and other facilities are visibly displaying the impact of underinvestment. As a result, the City is exploring several stable revenue generating alternatives including a real estate transfer tax ballot measure in November 2024. It is also important that the City update its fees to allow for more accurate recovery of its costs.

Agenda Item #11.2.

Development impact fees are charged to new development and support upgrades to the City’s infrastructure necessitated by such development and are generally paid as a requirement to obtain a building permit. The last development impact fee study was completed in April 2013 and an updated development impact fee schedule was adopted by the City Council on November 12, 2013 through Ordinance 2013-2.

In September 2015, staff issued a Request for Proposals for a Full Cost Services and Development Impact Fee Study to include a cost allocation plan, user fee study, and a development impact fee study. On October 9, 2015 the City received four proposal which were reviewed by City staff and an outside consultant. In November 2015, the City selected Willdan Financial Services to conduct a Full Cost Services and Development Impact Fee Study and entered into a professional services agreement on November 24, 2015 by Resolution 2015-146.

During the FY 2020-21 budget development, City Council requested funding for an inclusionary and workforce housing study be included in the FY 2020-21 adopted City budget. On February 23, 2021, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. to complete the Inclusionary Housing Study however after staff review of the initial report and concerns with the data source, that work on that project was terminated.

As part of the Inclusionary Housing Study and during the final analysis of the Affordable Housing Impact fees, it was determined that it would be necessary to include a commercial linkage fee analysis. Willdan Financial Services was available to conduct this analysis to prepare recommendations for the amounts and classifications for a housing linkage fee for St. Helena. This fee links the jobs created by commercial development to the needs for the production of affordable housing. The study determines the per-unit affordability gap by number of households in each job type, by income level to determine linkage fee on a per square foot basis by category of nonresidential development.

Willdan Financial Services completed the draft Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Study in December 2024.

Following the completion of the review of the report by staff and the City Attorney, the City released the draft report on January 22, 2024 to local builders and affordable housing organizations and requested comments prior to formal adoption and approval by City Council. Comments were requested following a three-week review period. Staff and consultant reviewed the comments and prepared responses to those comments (Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item #11.2.

The Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000) authorizes local governments to impose fees on new development provided that a nexus is shown between the fee that is charged and the impact of the new development. Local jurisdictions use impact fees to fund affordable housing in two primary ways: 1) through fees imposed on new market-rate residential projects, typically called housing impact fees; and 2) through fees imposed on new commercial development, typically called commercial linkage fees. Funds collected through housing impact and linkage fees are typically deposited into a housing trust fund. As with all fees imposed under the Mitigation Fee Act, a nexus study must be completed in order to justify the imposition of the fee. Linkage fees and housing impact fees are most typically assessed on a per square foot basis, as opposed to the per unit basis often used for inclusionary housing in-lieu fees.

The justification for imposing housing impact fees on new residential development is that new market-rate housing increases demand for goods and services in the community, which in turn creates new lower paid jobs and creates a need for housing affordable to lower-income households. Similarly, a nexus study for a commercial linkage fee would use an estimate of the number of jobs created by a new commercial development to establish the number of new housing units needed by new employees by income level.

A key challenge in the development of new impact fees is ensuring that the new fee will not result in the financial infeasibility of new development. According to a Terner Center for Housing Innovation report, cities frequently set fees well below what is justified in the corresponding nexus study. However, single-impact fees should not be considered in a vacuum, as projects are often subject to multiple other fees and exactions. Feasibility studies that consider the total financial impact of all fees can help ensure that new fees will not constrain development. To that end, linkage fees and housing impact fees may be less appropriate in jurisdictions where greenfield development is occurring, and impact fees related to the installation of new infrastructure are high. The Terner Center report noted that linkage fees and housing impact fees were most common in more urbanized communities where the majority of development was occurring on infill sites.

Affordable Housing Impact Fee
New residential development generates population growth. Residents who can afford to purchase or rent this new housing then spend their disposable income in the city.

Consequently, the increased spending results in the need to hire new workers to accommodate the increased demand for goods and services associated with new development. The analysis in the study establishes the connection between the increase in household spending associated with new development and the number of new workers that will be hired by local businesses to meet the demand.

Employment growth provides occupations at various wage and salary levels. Low wage workers cannot afford market rate housing within the City of St. Helena, so an affordable housing impact fee can be calculated to bridge the gap between what low wage workers can afford to pay for and the cost of providing that housing.

Agenda Item #11.2.

The analysis presented in the study defines the upper limit for a housing impact fee to be charged on new rental and for-sale housing to mitigate impacts on affordable housing needs. The maximum fee is not necessarily the recommended fee.

The maximum justified affordable housing impact fee schedule is summarized in Table

1. The fees shown here are the maximum supportable under state law. However, as a policy decision the City Council can adopt fee amounts that are less than the maximum justified amounts. Consequently, Table 1 also demonstrates the resulting fees if adopted at 15%, or 10%, respectively of the maximum justified fee amounts.

Table 1: Maximum Justified Affordable Housing Impact Fee Schedule Maximum
Justified Fee per
Square Foot
15% of Maximum
Justified fee
per Square Foot
10% of
Maximum
Justified fee
per Square
Foot
New Residential Rental
Unit $ 135 $ 20
$
14 New Residential For Sale
Unit 196 29 20
Commercial Linkage Fee Schedule
The study calculates the maximum legal fee charged on new commercial development for affordable housing in the following steps:

1. Establish commercial prototypes representing typical commercial development in St. Helena.

2. Estimate the number of workers that will work in the new commercial space.

3. Estimate worker household incomes.

4. Calculate the affordability gap.

5. Calculate maximum commercial linkage fee for each prototype.

The maximum justified commercial linkage fee schedule is summarized in Table 2. The fees shown here are the maximum supportable under state law. The City can adopt any amount up to the amounts shown here. Table 2 also demonstrates the resulting fees if adopted at 15%, or 10%, respectively of the maximum justified fee amounts.

Table 2: Maximum Justified Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Schedule Maximum
Justified Fee per
Square Foot
15% of Maximum
Justified fee
per Square Foot
10% of
Maximum
Justified fee
Agenda Item #11.2.

per Square
Foot
Commercial $ 141 $
21 $
14 Office 176 26 18
Industrial 67 10 7
Hotel 75 11 7
Affordable Housing Fee Comparison
As a result of the maximum justified fee in the study proposed as significantly higher than the existing fee, City staff requested Willdan Financial Services to conduct an analysis of the impacts. Table 3 shows a comparison between the existing affordable housing fee and the maximum justified fee.

Table 3: Residential Affordable Housing Fee Comparison
Fees for Prototype Units St. Helena Current St. Helena Maximum Justified
Single Family, 2,761
square feet, 3 bedrooms
$
22,500
$
541,156
Single Family, 3,780
square feet, 5 bedrooms 27,500 740,880
Public Notice
A public notice was published on June 13, 2024 in the Napa Valley Register. The proposed fee schedule and methodology for the fee calculations was made available for public review, electronically on the City's website by clicking the following link:

Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Study or by appointment in the City Clerk’s office.

Resolution
St. Helena Municipal Code Section 17.30.030.E provides a methodology for the calculation of housing in-lieu fees, which is currently calculated on a percentage basis of the projected construction cost of the market rate dwelling unit. Pursuant to a prior agenda item, staff has recommended introduction of a proposed ordinance that will amend Section 17.30.030.E of Chapter 17.30 of the City's Municipal Code to revise the calculation methodology based on square foot floor area. The amount and calculation of the housing in-lieu fee will be established by City Council resolution. This is consistent with the methodology supporting the adoption of the housing in-lieu fee as set forth in the Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Study prepared by Willdan, and a more common approach by local jurisdictions across the State that is easier to implement for City staff and the Council. Staff is proposing that the City Council approve the resolutions adopting the updated housing in-lieu fees and nonresidential/commercial linkage fees based on the Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Study, which updates are subject to approval of the proposed ordinance, and will not take effect until after the ordinance is in effect.

Agenda Item #11.2.

Staff Recommendation
Based on the results of the Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Study staff is recommending adopting 10% of the maximum justified fee to ensure that the new fee does not result in the financial infeasibility of new development. Staff is recommending implementation of the recommended affordable housing impact fees and commercial linkage fees, through the approval of the proposed resolution.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: None.

GOAL:

Goal 1: Strengthen Financial Sustainability
Goal 5: Enhance Quality of Life
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1-Willdan Responses to Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Nexus Study Comments
St. Helena - Affordable Housing and Commercial Linakge Fee Report - Final 5-22-24 Resolution - Housing In-Lieu Fee-FINAL 6-20-2024
Resolution - Housing Impact Fee-FINAL 6-20-2024
Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
1 | P a g e
Willdan Financial Services Responses to Comments on the Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Nexus Study
Comments From Jennifer La Liberte

1. When is this item scheduled to go to City Council, and when will the staff report be published? This item is scheduled for the City Council meeting on May 14, 2024.

2. Can the City provide a prototype comparison of the proposed Affordable Housing Impact Fee, which is in dollars per square foot, with the current fee, which is a percentage of construction costs? It seems that would be helpful for the decision makers as well as the public.

Willdan has prepared a fee comparison comparing the City’s current fees to the maximum justified fee schedule and other Napa County cities. Table 1 below shows the residential housing fee comparison, and Table 2 displays the commercial linkage fee comparison.

Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
2 | P a g e
Tabe 1: Residential Affordable Housing Fee Comparison
American
Canyon Napa Cloverdale Cotati Healdsburg
Rohnert
Park
Santa Rosa
(Inside
Downtown)
Santa Rosa
(Outside
Downtown) Sebastopol1
St. Helena
Current
St. Helena -
Maximum
Justified
Fee Schedules
Per Square Foot
Single Family, Townhouse 3.43 4.75 - - - - - 22.24 -
Stacked Flats, Apartment 3.98 4.05 - - - - - 22.24 -
0 to 909 square feet - - - - - 4.00 2.00 22.24 -
910 square feet or above - - - - - 8.00 3.00 22.24 -
Rental Unit - - - 2.15 4.02 - - 22.24 135
For Sale Unit - - - 16.70 - - - 22.24 196
-
Per Unit
Studio $ 24,000
1 Bed $ 27,400
2 Bed $ 30,900
3 Bed $ 34,300
4 Bed $ 37,000
5 Bed $ 39,800
For Sale Unit $ 15,520
Fees for Prototype Units
Single Family, 2,761 square feet,
3 bedrooms $ 9,470 $13,115 $ 34,300 $ 33,400 $ 46,109 $ 15,520 $ 22,088 $ 8,283 $ 61,405 $ 22,500 $ 541,156 Single Family, 3,780 square feet,
5 bedrooms 12,965 17,955 39,800 41,400 63,126 15,520 30,240 11,340 84,067 27,500 740,880 Based on
sales price of
unit, calculated
as follows:
$2,400 first
$125,000 of
sales price
+$200 for each
$5,000
increment
thereafter
The housing
in-lieu fee
shall be
charged on a
percentage
basis of the
projected
construction
costs of
market rate
dwelling
units.
1 No in-lieu fee is required for less than 4 dw elling units. For 5 or more dw elling units, on-site inclusionary housing is required: https://sebastopol.municipal.codes/SMC/17.250 If there is a decimal fraction unit requirement, an in-lieu fee shall be provided equal to the applicable decimal fraction times the established in-lieu fee for one inclusionary unit (based on the average size of the units being built), or, at the developer’s discretion, an inclusionary unit may be provided.

Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
3 | P a g e
Table 2: Commercial Linkage Fee Comparison
Land Use
Category
American
Canyon Calistoga1 Napa Yountville Cotati2 Petaluma3
Rohnert
Park3
Santa
Rosa Sebastopol3 Sonoma
St. Helena -
Current
St. Helena
Maximum
Justified
Office $ 0.87 $ 2.63 $3.55 $ 11.60 $ 2.39 $ 3.36 $ 0.69 $ 3.00 $ 2.08 $ 4.00 $ 4.11 $ 176.08 Hotel 0.87 1,756.35 6.00 11.60 2.39 3.36 0.69 3.00 2.08 15.00 3.80 74.64 Retail 0.87 3.81 3.55 11.60 4.12 5.81 1.19 3.00 3.59 4.00 5.21 141.29 Industrial 0.57 1.93 3.50 11.60 2.47 3.46 0.71 3.00 2.15 n/a 1.26 66.66 All fees charged per square foot, except for Calistoga hotel fee, w hich is charged per room. 1 Calistoga hotel fee charged per room.
2 Hotel and office assumed charged at "commercial" rate. New construction less than 2,000 sf, and the first 2,000 sf of any commercial project is exempt. 3 Hotel and office assumed charged at "commercial" rate.

Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
4 | P a g e

3. Can the City provide an example of how much one or more of the current proposed hotel developments would generate in housing impact fees with the current fee and the proposed fee at the 10% and 15% levels, and compare that to what it would cost the developer to construct the number of affordable housing units that particular development will necessitate? Table 3 displays the potential commercial linkage fee revenue for a proposed hotel project, under the maximum justified fee schedule, the 15% and 10% scenarios. The current proposed hotel project is expected to be 75 rooms and 52,313 square feet.

For reference, the last hotel entitled included 62 rooms, and the City negotiated $3.4 M in payment towards affordable housing back in 2020 when housing costs were lower. It is the City’s policy to require a Development Agreement for all hotels to produce more housing production or larger funding than impact fees provide.

4. For the fee calculation on Table 1.11, how is the “Units Demanded” factor calculated? Or what is it based on?
Units demanded are identified in Tables 1.8 and 1.9. They are the number of units needed to house the employment generation needed to meet induced demand from the household spending of market rate households.

5. Has the City or consultant determined a maximum threshold a private development project can tolerate for the housing impact or in-lieu fee? If not, how did the consultant arrive at the 10% to 15% maximum for the proposed fee.

City staff recommended the 10% and 15% scenarios. A maximum threshold a private project can tolerate has not been determined, as it is subject to a wide variety of factors that vary from project to project and change according to market conditions. The 10% and 15% scenarios would make the fees more in line with the other Sonoma County cities in the fee comparison compared to the maximum justified fees.

Comments:

Table 3: Potential Hotel Fee Revenue
Square Feet 52,313
Maximum Justified Fee per Square Foot $ 75
Maximum Justified Fee $ 3,923,475
15% of Maximum Justified Fee 588,521
10% of Maximum Justified Fee 392,348
Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
5 | P a g e

1. It is a difficult balancing act to ensure the City can achieve a reasonable fee requirement while not discouraging private development. The City should identify and adopt incentives to encourage developers to include affordable housing in their developments that would be more attractive than writing a check to ensure affordable units actually get built.

The higher the fee, the greater the incentive for developer to incorporate affordable housing. A drawback of this approach is that some projects are limited in scale or other factors that make providing affordable housing problematic.

2. Toward the City’s goal to encourage housing, the City should consider adopting a policy that exempts affordable housing projects from paying impact and other fees, rather than requiring each project proponent to request a waiver, project by project. The City of Sacramento’s Zero-Dollar Rate Program For Affordable Dwelling Units is a good example to follow.

This is a common approach. Units that meet certain criteria (below market rate in perpetuity for a certain number of years) are frequently assessed reduced or exempt from paying impact fees. This is a policy decision, however, and therefore outside the scope of this fee study.

3. It would be helpful in the staff report to include a 10-year history of the Housing Impact Fee fund, how much has been paid, and how the funds have been utilized.

Table 4 displays the revenue and expenditure history of the housing impact fee fund.

Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
6 | P a g e
Table 4: Historical Affordable Housing Impact Fee Revenue and Expenses FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 Totals Affordable Housing Impact Fees $884,027 $257,649 $427,649 $235,122 $ 80,340 $176,224 $317,631 $ 106,784 $ 2,226 $212,358 $2,700,009 Utilities - 684 McCorkle Ave $ 2,470 $ 2,314 $ 917 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (40) $ - $ 5,661 Maintenance - 684 McCorkle Avenue 2,488 750 - - - - - - - - 3,238 Property Taxes - 684 McCorkle Avenue 6,558 6,562 20 - - - - - - - 13,140 Title & Appraisal - 684 McCorkle Avenue - - 4,982 - - - - - - - 4,982 Napa Housing Authority - Housing Services 20,950 - - - - - - - - - 20,950 Affordable Housing Feasibility Study - 5,000 - - - - - - - - 5,000 Attorney Fees 4,424 5,388 21,848 91,550 19,754 20,472 - - (1,574) - 161,862 Brenkle Court Contributions - - 24,300 - 2,938 120,000 316,884 25,016 4,469 - 493,606 Turley Flats Contributions/Loan - - - 438 813,639 50,797 (50,336) 185,884 - 9,998 1,010,420 Our Town St. Helena | Non-Profit Grant - - - - - 10,000 25,000 - - - 35,000 Our Town St. Helena | 963 Pope Street - - - - - - 450,000 - 8,400 3,600 462,000 723 Hunt Avenue | CDBG Grant Reimbursement - - - - - - - 1,400,565 (1,400,565) - - Affordable Housing Fee Update - - - - - - - - 6,045 - 6,045 Housing Element Update - - - - - - - - 69,210 29,915 99,125 Total Expenses $ 36,890 $ 20,014 $ 52,066 $ 91,988 $836,331 $201,270 $741,548 $1,611,464 $ (1,314,054) $ 43,513 $2,321,029 Source: City of St. Helena.

Expenses
Revenues
Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
7 | P a g e
Comments from Mary Stephenson

1. What is the rationale for recommending 10% to 15% of maximum fees? This is a City staff recommendation. See response #5 above.

2. How many new housing starts (and renovation, if that is included in the fee structure) has the city had in the last 5-10 years? Projecting into the future with the recommended fee structure, what is the potential funding that new (and renovated if it applies) units could generate for the city? From 2015 to 2024 the City has added 29 net new residential dwelling units according to data from the California Department of Finance. Renovation is not included in the fee structure, unless the renovation is adding new square footage. Table 5 displays a projection of potential fee revenue, based on the growth projections from the City’s recently adopted development impact fee nexus study.

3. The current rents seem high to me. The rental rates include mostly single-family dwellings, which excludes a significant number of small multi-unit buildings that I think would illustrate a wider range of rentals.

The current rents were estimated based on all the available units that were advertised for rent at the time the study was completed. There were few multifamily units advertised for rent at that time. The only units that were excluded from the sample were luxury units with rents more than $10,000 per month. Further, many of the City’s existing multifamily units are rented at below market rate rents, so they do not accurately reflect current market rates.

4. Is the proposed fees for commercial development tied to past or projected development in each category? Is there an historical overview of commercial development by category that informs this? Table 5: Projected Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee Revenue Land Use
Projected
Increase (Sq.

Ft.)
Maximum
Justified Fee
per Square
Foot
Potential Fee
Revenue
(Maximum
Justified Fees)
Potential Fee
Revenue (15%
Fee Scenario)
Potential Fee
Revenue (10%
Fee Scenario)
Residential 685,152 $ 196 $ 134,289,792 $ 20,143,469 $ 13,428,979 Nonresidential
Commercial 325,943 $ 141 $ 45,958,019 $ 6,893,703 $ 4,595,802 Office 92,638 176 16,304,294 2,445,644 1,630,429
Industrial 640,517 67 42,914,655 6,437,198 4,291,466
Total 1,744,251 $ 239,466,761 $ 35,920,014 $ 23,946,676 Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
8 | P a g e
The nonresidential fees are calculated based on the affordable housing demands of a hypothetical project, informed by the likely type of workers and current salary data.

5. Is it possible to see an analysis of what the current Housing Impact Fee structure has generated over the last 10 years divided between residential and commercial fees and how that money has been used? See Table 4 above for historical fee revenue and expenditures.

6. Has any scenario been flushed out regarding how any of the existing proposals for new hotels could contribute funding under this proposed fee structure and how that compares to the cost of housing incremental employees at various salary levels as documented in the study? This analysis has not evaluated any existing proposals for hotels.

7. How does this new Housing Impact Fee Study relate to the City’s plan to create the VL and L housing units in our RHNA requirements?
Affordable housing fee and commercial linkage fee revenue can be used to help fund the development of very low and low income units in the City.

Comments from Joe McGrath
General Comments/Questions:
*The report seems to lack effective context. It is not clear from the report what the current baseline policy is and/or fee structure. The comparison to other Napa County cities is useful, but there is not a comparison to St. Helena status quo.

Willdan has prepared a fee comparison comparing the City’s current fees to the maximum justified fee schedule and other Napa County cities. See Tables 1 and 2 above. * It is also not clear if this Impact Fee is meant to be in lieu of Inclusionary policy requirements for residential development or in addition to inclusionary requirements. (I attempted to look thru current zoning code but this is very time consuming as new code is not yet hyperlinked :/) Please refer to 17.30.030 E in the new zoning code. Please note that the City will be amending the zoning text to reflect that the calculation is based on the square footage of the proposed unit (no longer percentage of construction cost). The Housing In-Lieu fee in the ordinance is the same as the impact fee, not in addition to the impact fee.
* It is not clear as to whether this fee applies to renovated S.F. or just new S.F.? Only applies to net new square footage. Per 17.30.030 A.3 “Upon the remodeling or rebuilding of a residential dwelling to add additional square footage, the housing impact fee shall be paid on the additional square footage (except for a one-time exclusion of 850 square feet per residence)” Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
9 | P a g e
* I believe the rental rates in the report are overstated and do not represent current market conditions.

The data biases itself by looking only at open listed units and appears to be mostly detached single family structures. I believe the construction cost per rental unit is also overstated and for some reason was based on a 5-unit complex whereas the work impact numbers were based on 100-units. Having said that, as both the rental rates are high and construction costs are high, the delta cost to deliver an affordable product to this sector is probably close.

The current rents were estimated based on all the available units that were up for rent at the time the study was completed. There were few multifamily units advertised for rent at that time. The only units that were excluded from the sample were luxury units with rents more than $10,000 per month. Were someone looking to rent a home, these would be the only available units to rent, so the data does reflect the current market.

The construction costs were based on data provided by the City. The City’s most recent experience came from 2020. Those costs were adjusted for inflation using the Engineering News Record’s Construction Cost index.

The hypothetical 100-unit market rate project is used to identify the affordable units demanded by income category. This is different from the cost to construct one affordable unit. The total affordability gap to meet the affordable housing demands of market rate units is then divided by 100 to identify the gap needed to meet the demands of a single unit, which drives the fee calculation. * It would be great to see a breakdown of Housing Impact Fee collections over the last ten years and a breakdown of where they were generated (ie Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Hospitality).

Please refer to Table 4 above. Unfortunately, the revenue data is not available by land use type paying the fee.
* It would also be great to see a Pareto/chart of where all of these funds collected have been allocated or spent.

Table 4 above also lists expenditures.

Inputs:
* For Residential Development. For projects >= 4 units the city should maintain an inclusionary policy (I believe it is 20%*,) and not create an in-lieu fee relief valve. It would fail logic to have both as you would be taxing the solution side of the ledger. Inclusionary Policies build affordable units, not just funds for future units. If you do create an in-lieu fee option it would seem that that fee should roughly represent a ~ 20 YR? Net Present Value of the delta income between market rents and affordable rents. [When I did this calculation in 2019 at 632 McCorkle, the 20YR NPV delta between market rents and affordable rents per inclusionary unit would have been approximately $200K/unit (I did not use a discount rate because I assumed both rents would rise proportionally). In comparing the $200K to 2019 costs per unit (~$550K) that represents about 36%. Against a 20% inclusionary policy that would represent 7.2% of ALL costs (20% * 36%). Instead I negotiated an "alternative equivalent" proposal which Agenda Item #11.2.

May 9, 2024
10 | P a g e
deed-restricted existing units in my portfolio. The 20-YR NPV of that proposal was closer to $100k per unit which would be ~3.6% of all costs. That was palatable.] I believe the report is advocating between $14-20/SF. If we assume $500/SF construction costs, and $20/SF that would be 4% of CONSTRUCTION costs. An In-lieu fee at that rate would not be a great deal for the City and the developer would likely take the lower cost in-lieu fee (as much as I hate to say this as a developer). I believe the City would rather have the deed-restricted units than the funds so it should bias towards the built units. Having said that, there is of course a limit where the rates simply cause projects not to pencil.
* For Residential Projects <4 Units. It seems to me here there should be an option to either deed restrict an ADU for SF - Triplex developments or have an in-lieu option with a fee structure akin to what I recommend above.
* For Commercial, Industrial, Hospitality, Hotels. I will not comment greatly here. It seems that this fee structure should be "progressive" in nature. No Impact on renovation project (ie. no new SF). Negligible impact on small businesses/projects, and have rate progression based on the size of project. The comparison with other Napa County cities and Sonoma is very informative on Hotel rates and greatly suggests that impact fee on hotels is far too low in St. Helena.

The fees are calculated on net new square footage, so they wouldn’t apply to renovation projects, unless they are adding square footage.

Agenda Item #11.2.

CITY OF ST. HELENA

AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL

LINKAGE IMPACT FEE STUDY
FINAL
MAY 22, 2024
Oakland Office Corporate Office Other Regional Offices
66 Franklin Street 27368 Via Industria Aurora, CO
Suite 300 Suite 200 Orlando, FL
Oakland, CA 94607 Temecula, CA 92590 Phoenix, AZ
Tel: (510) 832-0899 Tel: (800) 755-6864 Plano, TX
Fax: (888) 326-6864 Seattle, WA
Washington, DC
www.willdan.com
Agenda Item #11.2.

This page intentionally left blank.

Agenda Item #11.2.

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 2 Background and Study Objectives 2
Affordable Housing Impact Fee Schedule 2
Commercial Linkage Fee Schedule 3

1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEE NEXUS ANALYSIS............................... 4 Nexus Approach 4
Housing Affordability in St. Helena 4
Market Rate Rents 4
Market Rate Housing Affordability 5
Market Rate Prototypes and Gross Income 7
Market Rate Rental Prototype 7
Market Rate For Sale Prototype 8
Aggregate Income 9
Induced Employment Impacts 10
Affordable Housing Development Costs 13
Affordability Gap and Maximum Fee Calculation 13

2. COMMERCIAL LINKAGE FEE ....................................................... 15 Nexus Approach 15
Commercial Prototypes 15
Industries 16
Occupations and Wages 21
Worker Households by Income Category 56
Affordability Gap 57
Maximum Justified Commercial Linkage Fee Schedule 58
APPENDIX ......................................................................................... 59 Agenda Item #11.2.

2 Executive Summary
This report documents an analysis of affordable housing impact fees needed to fund new development’s share of affordable housing induced by the household spending associated with new market rate development. It also documents a commercial linkage fee analysis which quantifies the connection between the development of commercial, office, industrial and hotel, development projects and the demand for affordable housing units.

Background and Study Objectives
The City of St. Helena has an inclusionary housing ordinance. In order to address the City’s ongoing unmet housing needs, St. Helena is considering implementing an amended affordable housing fee on new development projects and inclusionary housing regulation. The purpose of the affordable housing fee is to mitigate the impact of new market rate development on the demand for affordable housing.

To adopt a development impact fee, a local jurisdiction must demonstrate the reasonable relationship (or “nexus”) between the development projects paying the fee and the fee that is charged. This nexus study quantifies the connection between the development of market rate housing and the demand for affordable housing units.

This residential nexus study examines the household income and spending generated by the new market rate households renting or buying new units in St. Helena. Using the IMPLAN economic model, the household spending associated with new development is translated into new induced job growth. These induced jobs will be at various wage rates; though many induced jobs will earn lower wages. Low-wage households cannot reasonably afford to pay for market rate housing in St. Helena, a housing impact fee can be justified to bridge the difference between what these new households can afford to pay and the cost of developing modest housing units to accommodate lower income households associated with induced job growth.

The commercial linkage fee analysis examines the relationship between jobs housed in various nonresidential development prototypes and the worker households that would need a subsidy to be able to afford to live in the City. Similar to the affordable housing impact fee, the commercial linkage fee would generate fee revenue to bridge the difference between what these new worker households can afford to pay and the cost of developing modest housing units to accommodate lower income households associated with the prototype development projects.

Affordable Housing Impact Fee Schedule
The maximum justified affordable housing impact fee schedule is summarized in Table E.1. The fees shown here are the maximum supportable under state law. However, as a policy decision the City Council can adopt fee amounts that are less than the maximum justified amounts.

Consequently, Table E.1 also demonstrates the resulting fees if adopted at 15%, or 10%, respectively of the maximum justified fee amounts.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 3 Maximum
Justified Fee per
Square Foot
15% of
Maximum
Justified fee
per Square
Foot
10% of
Maximum
Justified fee
per Square
Foot
New Residential Rental Unit $ 135 $ 20 $ 14
New Residential For Sale Unit 196 29 20
Source: Table 1.11
Table E.1: Maximum Justified Affordable Housing Impact Fee Schedule
Commercial Linkage Fee Schedule
The maximum justified commercial linkage fee schedule is summarized in Table E.2. The fees shown here are the maximum supportable under state law. The City can adopt any amount up to the amounts shown here. Table E.2 also demonstrates the resulting fees if adopted at 15%, or 10%, respectively of the maximum justified fee amounts.

Maximum
Justified Fee per
Square Foot
15% of
Maximum
Justified fee
per Square
Foot
10% of
Maximum
Justified fee
per Square
Foot
Commercial $ 141 $ 21 $ 14
Office 176 26 18
Industrial 67 10 7
Hotel 75 11 7
Source: Table 2.12.

Table E.2: Maximum Justified Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Schedule
Agenda Item #11.2.

4 1. Affordable Housing Fee Nexus
Analysis
This chapter details an analysis of the need for affordable housing required to accommodate lower-income employees that support growth within the City of St. Helena. It documents a reasonable relationship between new development and a fee to fund affordable housing.

Nexus Approach
New residential development generates population growth. Residents who can afford to purchase or rent this new housing then spend their disposable income in the city. Consequently, this increased spending results in the need to hire new workers to accommodate the increased demand for goods and services associated with new development. This analysis establishes the connection between the increase in household spending associated with new development and the number of new workers that will be hired by local businesses to meet that demand.

Employment growth provides occupations at various wage and salary levels. Low wage workers cannot afford market rate housing within the City of St. Helena, so an affordable housing impact fee can be calculated to bridge the gap between what low wage workers can afford to pay for and the cost of providing that housing.

The analysis presented here defines the upper limit for a housing impact fee to be charged on new rental and for-sale housing to mitigate impacts on affordable housing needs. The maximum fee is not necessarily the recommended fee.

Housing Affordability in St. Helena
This section of the chapter evaluates housing affordability in St. Helena, using Department of Housing and Community Development State Income Limits and current market rate rent data.

Table 1.1 displays the Napa County Income limits, as identified by HUD.

Table 1.1: 2023 Napa County Income Limits
Persons per HH: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Median Income 90,700 103,700 116,650 129,600 139,950 150,350 160,700 171,050 Extremely Low 28,050 32,050 36,050 40,050 43,300 46,500 49,700 52,900 Very Low Income 46,750 53,400 60,100 66,750 72,100 77,450 82,800 88,150 Low Income 74,700 85,400 96,050 106,700 115,250 123,800 132,350 140,850 Median Income 90,700 103,700 116,650 129,600 139,950 150,350 160,700 171,050 Moderate Income 108,850 124,400 139,950 155,500 167,950 180,400 192,800 205,250 Source: Department of Housing and Community Development, State Income Limits 2023.

Market Rate Rents
Willdan gathered data regarding existing market rate rents within the City of St. Helena city limits.

This information will inform the assumption of the household income necessary to rent a housing unit in St. Helena at the market rate. Average asking rents as of October, 2023 are shown in Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 5 Table 1.2. All current rental listings in St. Helena from Zillow.com; and apartments.com were collected and analyzed. Luxury listings asking above $10,000 per month in rent were excluded from the sample. The remaining observations were used to calculate the average asking rent, by number of bedrooms in Table 1.2. Appendix Table A.1 includes details regarding the observations of asking rents in the City.

Table 1.2: Average Asking Rent, October 2023
Unit Type
Average Asking
Rent Unit Count
Studio1 $ 1,823 -
1-Bedroom 3,350 3
2-Bedroom 3,672 16
3-Bedroom 5,802 33
1 There are no studio apartments in St. Helena. Rent for studio apartment estimated using trend implied by rents for larger units.

Sources: Apartments.com; Zillow .com; Willdan Financial Services.

Market Rate Housing Affordability
To evaluate housing affordability in St. Helena, the analysis compares the household income at the midpoint of each income category from Table 1.1 to the market rents by number of bedrooms from Table 1.2. This analysis uses household incomes at the mid-point of each income range when calculating affordable rents as a conservative measure to avoid overstating the affordability of rental housing. In addition to rents, the analysis also includes a conservative estimate of utility costs. The maximum affordable monthly rent including utilities for each income category is calculated as 30 percent of gross monthly household income. If the difference between the maximum affordable rent and the total monthly housing costs is negative, then housing for that income category and housing product is considered unaffordable.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 6 Table 1.3: Affordability of Market Rate Rental Housing in St. Helena, 2023 Household (Unit) 1 Person 2 Person 3 Person 4 Person
Size: (Studio) (1 Bedroom) (2 Bedrooms) (3 Bedrooms)
Average Market-Rate Rent1 $ 1,823 $ 3,350 $ 3,672 $ 5,802 Utility Costs2
202 219 261 326
Total Monthly Housing Costs $ 2,025 $ 3,569 $ 3,933 $ 6,128 Extremely Low Income (up to 30% AMI)
Household Income at Midpoint of Income Range3 $ 14,025 $ 16,025 $ 18,025 $ 20,025 Maximum Affordable Monthly Rent4 149 182 190 175
Amount Above (Below) Market Rate Rent (1,674) (3,168) (3,482) (5,627) Very Low Income (31-50% AMI)
Household Income at Midpoint of Income Range3 $ 37,400 $ 42,725 $ 48,075 $ 53,400 Maximum Affordable Monthly Rent4 733 849 941 1,009
Amount Above (Below) Market Rate Rent (1,090) (2,501) (2,731) (4,793) Low Income (51-80% AMI)
Household Income at Midpoint of Income Range3 $ 60,725 $ 69,400 $ 78,075 $ 86,725 Maximum Affordable Monthly Rent4
1,316 1,516 1,691 1,842
Amount Above (Below) Market Rate Rent (507) (1,834) (1,981) (3,960) Moderate Income (81-120% AMI)
Household Income at Midpoint of Income Range3 $ 91,775 $ 104,900 $ 118,000 $ 131,100 Maximum Affordable Monthly Rent4 2,092 2,404 2,689 2,952 Amount Above (Below) Market Rate Rent 269 (946) (983) (2,850) 1 See Table 1.2
2 Utility Costs per HACN Utility Allow ance
4 Assumes 30-percent of gross income spent on housing and utilities costs.

Sources: California Department of Housing and Community Development, 2023; Willdan Financial Services. 3 Household income limits published by the California Department of Housing and Community Development for Napa County, 2023. Show s midpoint of income range. See Table 1.1
Table 1.4 identifies the income required to afford market rate rents in the City, by household size.

The income required to afford market rate rents is assumes that 30 percent of gross income spent on housing and utility costs is considered affordable. The annual affordable housing costs is then compared to the area median income (area median income) to estimate amount of gross income above AMI that is needed to afford each product type, by household size.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 7 Table 1.4: Income Required to Afford Market-Rate Rents in St. Helena, 2023 Household (Unit) 1 Person 2 Person 3 Person 4 Person
Size: (Studio) (1 Bedroom) (2 Bedrooms) (3 Bedrooms)
Total Monthly Housing Costs $ 2,025 $ 3,569 $ 3,933 $ 6,128 Annual Housing Costs $ 24,296 $ 42,828 $ 47,195 $ 73,534 Household Income Required1 80,988 142,760 157,315 245,113 Area Median Income (AMI) 90,700 103,700 116,650 129,600 Income Required as Percent of AMI 89% 138% 135% 189%
1 Assumes 30-percent of gross income spent on housing and utilities costs.

Sources: Tables 1.1 and 1.3.

Market Rate Prototypes and Gross Income
This analysis identified two market rate residential prototypes based on a review of the housing market in St. Helena.

Market Rate Rental Prototype
The data collected to identify the current average asking rent in St. Helena was also used to identify typical rental product characteristics. The typical rental unit in the City is a three bedroom, two bathroom detached single family unit sized at roughly 1,600 square feet.1 Using the current asking rent data, and the housing cost as percent of gross income assumptions discussed above, the amount of gross income needed to afford rent in St. Helena is calculated in Table 1.5. It requires an annual gross household income of $217,347 to rent a three-bedroom market rate rental unit in St. Helena.
1 Typical rental unit in St. Helena identified based on data from CoStar which is summarized in Table 1.5. Full dataset is included in the Appendix.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 8 Table 1.5: Rental Residential Prototype, Q3 2023
Rental
Bedrooms 3
Bathrooms 2
Square feet 1,608
Rent per Square Foot $ 3.38
Monthly Rent $ 5,434
Annual Rent 65,204
Housing Cost as Percent of Income1 30%
Gross Household Income $ 217,347
1 Renter housing burden is estimated at 30-percent of gross household income, based on California Health & Safety Code Sections 50052.5 and 50053.

Sources: CoStar; Willdan Financial Services.

Market Rate For Sale Prototype
Recent housing sales data was collected from mlslistings.com from June to September 2023. The sample included 24 observations of home sales within this time period. That data informed the typical for sale product prototypes displayed below in Table 1.6. The gross household income necessary to afford to purchase the prototype is then calculated using current interest rates and estimated housing ownership costs. It requires an annual gross household income of over $328,000 to purchase a home in St. Helena.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 9 Table 1.6: For Sale Residential Prototype
Single Family
Detached
Prototype Assumptions 1
Bedrooms 3
Bathrooms 2
Square feet 1,669
Sales Price per Square Foot $ 889
Sales Price $ 1,483,500
Down Payment (20%) $ 296,700
Loan Amount $ 1,186,800
Interest Rate2 7.18%
Monthly Mortgage Payment $ 8,040
Annual Property Tax3 15,676
Homeowners Insurance 2,800
Annual Housing Costs $ 114,954
Housing Cost as Percent of Income4 35%
Gross Household Income $ 328,439
1 Based on an analysis of recent sales in St. Helena, as reported by mlslistings.com from June to September 2023.
3 City of St. Helena California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022, p. 125. 2 Average 30-year fixed interest rate as of September 14, 2023 per http://w w w .freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms_archives.html 4 Homeow ner housing burden is estimated at 35-percent of gross household income, based on California Health & Safety Code Sections 50052.5 and 50053.

Sources: mlslistings.com; Freddie Mac; City of St. Helena; Willdan Financial Services.

Aggregate Income
Table 1.7 identifies the aggregate household income of 100 single family owner households and 100 single family renter households who can afford housing at the market rate. This aggregate income is used as the driver of induced economic effects using the IMPLAN model.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 10 Table 1.7: Estimated Incomes by Income Categories of Prototype Buyers and Renters
Single Family
Detached
(Buyer)
Single Family
Detached
(Renter)
Income Category Over $200,000 Over $200,000
Gross Household Income $ 328,439 $ 217,347
New Households 100 100
Aggregate Household Income $ 32,843,915 $ 21,734,748
Sources: Tables 1.5 and 1.6.

Induced Employment Impacts
The aggregate household income identified above is used to estimate the number of new jobs that new households will support with their household expenditures using the IMPLAN model.

IMPLAN is an input-output based economic impact model used for a variety of different analyses.

In this case IMPLAN models the economy for a region.

For this analysis, IMPLAN used data specific to Napa County to estimate the multipliers effects from new households. Essentially, IMPLAN used the increase in household spending associated with the new prototype households to identify the jobs (or fraction of jobs) that are supported by that spending.

The output of the IMPLAN model was then cross referenced with the assumed compensation associated with each occupation to estimate the aggregate number of jobs induced within each income category.

Table 1.8 shows the results of the IMPLAN analysis in terms of the induced employment and household generation supported by household spending from the gross income of 100 market rate rental households.

Table 1.9 shows the results of the IMPLAN analysis in terms of the induced employment and household generation supported by household spending from the gross income of 100 market rate single family ownership households.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 11 Table 1.8: Employment and Household Generation from a New 100-Unit Rental Development by Income Level SOC
Code Major Goup
Extremely
Low
Very Low
Income Low Income
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Total
Employment
11 Management Occupations - - - 1.30 0.38 1.68
13 Business and Financial Operations Occupations - - 0.86 0.49 - 1.35 15 Computer and Mathematical Occupations - - - 0.36 - 0.36 17 Architecture and Engineering Occupations - - 0.02 0.06 - 0.08 19 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations - 0.02 - 0.05 0.04 0.11 21 Community and Social Service Occupations - 0.87 - 0.19 - 1.06 23 Legal Occupations - - 0.05 - 0.07 0.12
25 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations - 1.30 0.18 - - 1.48 27 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations - - 0.14 0.26 - 0.40 29 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations - - 0.83 - 1.59 2.42 31 Healthcare Support Occupations 2.71 0.63 0.07 - - 3.41 33 Protective Service Occupations - 0.34 0.02 - - 0.36
35 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations 3.30 1.55 0.57 - - 5.42 37 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations 1.03 0.25 0.06 - - 1.34 39 Personal Care and Service Occupations 1.51 0.12 - - - 1.63 41 Sales and Related Occupations 3.06 0.09 0.81 0.11 - 4.07 43 Office and Administrative Support Occupations - 3.30 0.30 - - 3.60 45 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations - 0.07 - - - 0.07 47 Construction and Extraction Occupations - 0.01 0.28 - - 0.29 49 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations - 0.39 0.55 - - 0.94 51 Production Occupations - 0.47 0.09 - - 0.56
53 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations - 2.35 0.13 0.01 - 2.49 Total Jobs 11.61 11.76 4.96 2.83 2.08 33.24
Total Households1 9.83 9.95 4.20 2.40 1.76 28.13
1 Assumes 1.18 jobs per household in Napa County based on data from the 2021 American Community Survey.

Sources: IMPLAN, US Census, American Community Survey, 2021; Willdan Financial Services.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 12 Table 1.9: Employment and Household Generation from a New 100-Unit Single Family For Sale Development by Income Level
SOC
Code Major Goup
Extremely
Low
Very Low
Income Low Income
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Total
Employment
11 Management Occupations - - - 1.95 0.57 2.52
13 Business and Financial Operations Occupations - - 1.30 0.74 - 2.04 15 Computer and Mathematical Occupations - - - 0.54 - 0.54 17 Architecture and Engineering Occupations - - 0.03 0.08 - 0.11 19 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations - 0.03 - 0.07 0.06 0.16 21 Community and Social Service Occupations - 1.31 - 0.29 - 1.60 23 Legal Occupations - - 0.07 - 0.11 0.18
25 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations - 1.97 0.27 - - 2.24 27 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations - - 0.21 0.40 - 0.61 29 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations - - 1.25 - 2.41 3.66 31 Healthcare Support Occupations 4.10 0.95 0.11 - - 5.16 33 Protective Service Occupations - 0.52 0.03 - - 0.55
35 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations 4.98 2.34 0.85 - - 8.17 37 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations 1.56 0.38 0.08 - - 2.02 39 Personal Care and Service Occupations 2.28 0.18 - - - 2.46 41 Sales and Related Occupations 4.62 0.13 1.22 0.16 - 6.13 43 Office and Administrative Support Occupations - 5.00 0.45 - - 5.45 45 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations - 0.10 0.01 - - 0.11 47 Construction and Extraction Occupations - 0.02 0.44 - - 0.46 49 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations - 0.59 0.84 - - 1.43 51 Production Occupations - 0.71 0.14 - - 0.85
53 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations - 3.55 0.18 0.02 - 3.75 Total Jobs 17.54 17.78 7.48 4.25 3.15 50.20
Total Households1 14.84 15.05 6.33 3.60 2.67 42.49
1 Assumes 1.18 jobs per household in Napa County based on data from the 2021 American Community Survey.

Sources: IMPLAN, US Census, American Community Survey, 2021; Willdan Financial Services.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 13 Affordable Housing Development Costs
Table 1.10 estimates the cost to build an affordable rental unit within the City of St. Helena.

These cost assumptions were provided by the City of St. Helena based on the City’s estimated cost of a five-unit affordable housing development project, and were adjusted for inflation from 2020 to current 2023 dollars.

Table 1.10: Affordable Housing Development
Costs
Apartment
Rental
Total Development Costs per Unit1 $ 910,500
Source: City of St. Helena.
1 Cost per unit to construct affordable units w as $694,000 in 2020. Adjusted for inflation to September, 2023 using the Engineering New s Record's Building Cost Index.

Affordability Gap and Maximum Fee Calculation
The housing affordability gap is the difference between what very low, low, and moderate-income households can afford to pay for housing, and the cost to develop affordable housing units. The affordable monthly rent associated with each income level is used to estimate the monthly supportable debt per unit, which is then used to estimate the loan proceeds associated with that level of income. The loan amount is compared to the affordable unit development costs, and the difference is the financing gap per unit.

The financing gap per unit is then multiplied by the number of units induced within each income category to determine the total financing gap associated with the 100 prototype units. This figure is then divided by 100 to determine the housing fee per unit, but prototype type. The fee per unit is finally divided by the assumed prototype square footage to determine the fee per square foot.

Table 1.11 displays the calculation of the affordability gap and maximum justified affordable housing impact fee for new rental units and for new single family units.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 14 Table 1.11: Affordable Housing Impact Fee Calculation Extremely
Low Income
(up to 30%
AMI)
Very Low
Income (31-
50% AMI)
Low Income
(51-80% AMI)
Moderate
Income (81-
120% AMI)
Household Income Limit $ 36,050 $ 60,100 $ 96,050 $ 139,950 Affordable Monthly Rent per Unit1 640 1,242 2,140 3,238 Monthly Operating Expenses 500 500 500 500
Vacancy 5% 5% 5% 5%
Net Operating Income per Unit 108 679 1,533 2,576
Monthly Supportable Debt Service per Unit 83 523 1,179 1,981 Loan Amount 12,177 76,438 172,495 289,795
Affordable Unit Development Costs 910,500 910,500 910,500 910,500 Financing Gap per Affordable Unit 898,323 834,062 738,005 620,705 Fee Calculation for New Rental Units
Units Demanded 9.83 9.95 4.20 2.40
Total Financing Gap $ 8,826,782 $ 8,301,249 $ 3,097,980 $ 1,486,653 Maximum Impact Fee per 100-Unit Development $ 21,712,665 Maximum Impact Fee per Unit $ 217,127
Prototype Square Feet 1,608
Maximum Impact Fee per Square Foot $ 135
Fee Calculation for New For Sale Single Family Units
Units Demanded 14.84 15.05 6.33 3.60
Total Financing Gap $ 13,335,208 $ 12,550,698 $ 4,671,954 $ 2,232,607 Maximum Impact Fee per 100-Unit Development $ 32,790,466 Maximum Impact Fee per Unit $ 327,905
Prototype Square Feet 1,669
Maximum Impact Fee per Square Foot $ 196
Financing Terms
Debt Coverage Ratio 1.3
Interest Rate 7.18%
Term of Loan 30
Sources: Tables 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8, 1.9 and 1.10.
1 Monthly affordable rent is calculated at 30% of the monthly AMI for a three-person household from Table 1.1, less utility allow ance for a three person household identified in Table 1.3.

Agenda Item #11.2.

15 2. Commercial Linkage Fee
This chapter details an analysis of the need for affordable housing required to accommodate lower-income employees associated with commercial development projects within the City of St.

Helena. It documents a reasonable relationship between new development and a commercial linkage fee to fund affordable housing.

Nexus Approach
This study calculates the maximum legal fee charged on new commercial development for affordable housing in the following steps:

1. Establish commercial prototypes representing typical commercial development in St. Helena. The prototypes used in this study are not intended to represent specific development projects. Instead, they represent the types of development projects that may be built in St. Helena.

2. Estimate the number of workers that will work in the new commercial space. The estimated number of workers are based occupancy density assumptions for each type of commercial development project. The employment density assumptions density factors were multiplied by the building size (100,000 square feet) to calculate the total number of workers occupying each commercial prototype.

3. Estimate worker household incomes. To determine the proportion of households requiring affordable housing the analysis uses local wage data associated with the industries and occupations housed within each prototype.

4. Calculate the affordability gap. The housing affordability gap is defined as the difference between what very low, low, and moderate-income households can afford to pay for housing, and the cost to develop new, modest housing units.

5. Calculate maximum commercial linkage fee for each prototype. The maximum commercial linkage fee for each prototype is calculated by multiplying the total number of very low, low, and moderate- income new worker households for each prototype (calculated in Step 3), by the corresponding affordable housing gap figure (calculated in Step 4). The total affordability gap was then divided by 100,000 SF, the size of each commercial prototype, to generate a maximum fee per square foot.

Commercial Prototypes
This study calculates commercial linkage fees for four types of nonresidential development projects. These nonresidential land use classifications correspond with the nonresidential land uses in the City’s development impact fee program. The prototypes are 100,000 square feet of commercial (service, retail), office, industrial and hotel development.

Table 2.1 displays prototype building sizes, and an estimate of net new workers per household.

Data from the US Census was used to identify the share of workers for each prototype that would be housed within City limits. The resulting net new workers are divided by the assumption of jobs per household to determine the number of net new worker households in St. Helena associated with each prototype.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 16 Table 2.1: Net New Workers per Prototype
Commercial Office Industrial Hotel
Prototype Building Size (Sq. Ft.) 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Employees per 100,000 Sq. Ft.1 212 326 116 100

11.40% 11.40% 11.40% 11.40%
Net New Workers Living in St. Helena 24.17 37.16 13.22 11.40 Jobs per Household3 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18
Households 20.48 31.49 11.21 9.66
1 Consistent w ith occupancy denisty factors from Development Impact Fee Study. 2 OnTheMap Application. Percent employed and living in St. Helena. 3 Assumes 1.18 jobs per household in Napa County based on data from the 2021 American Community Survey.

Sources: https://onthemap.ces.census.gov/; 2021 American Community Survey; Tables 2.2, Willdan Financial Services.

Percent of St. Helena Employees with
Jobs inside City limits2
Industries
Various industries could be housed within each prototype. This analysis used the most recent available national industry data as of the fourth quarter of 2022 from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics to identify the range of industries associated with each prototype. Table 2.2 through Table 2.5 identify the industries associated with each prototype. In the next step, the occupations associated with each industry will be used to estimate the wages of workers that may be employed within each prototype.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 17 Table 2.2: Definition of Industries for Retail Commercial Prototype
NAICS
Code
(2022)
NAICS
Code
(2017) Description
Percent Total
Workers in
Prototype
7225 7225 Restaurants and other eating places 37.8%
4451 4451 Grocery stores 10.0%
4411 4411 Automobile dealers 4.5%
4441 4441 Building material and supplies dealers 4.4%
4561 4461 Health and personal care stores 4.0%
8111 8111 Automotive repair and maintenance 3.5%
4571 4471 Gasoline stations 3.4%
4581 4481 Clothing stores 3.2%
8121 8121 Personal care services 2.5%
4413 4413 Auto parts, accessories, and tire stores 2.1% 4591 4511 Sporting goods and musical instrument stores 1.8% 4599 4539 Other miscellaneous store retailers 1.7%
4491 4422 Home furnishings stores 1.6%
4492 4431 Electronics and appliance stores 1.6%
7224 7224 Drinking places, alcoholic beverages 1.5%
8129 8129 Other personal services 1.4%
4231 4231 Motor vehicle and parts merchant wholesalers 1.3% 4237 4237 Hardware and plumbing merchant wholesalers 1.1% 4233 4233 Lumber and const. supply merchant wholesalers 0.9% 8123 8123 Drycleaning and laundry services 0.9%
4452 4452 Specialty food stores 0.9%
8113 8113 Commercial machinery repair and maintenance 0.8% 4594 4532 Office supplies, stationery, and gift stores 0.8% 5321 5321 Automotive equipment rental and leasing 0.7%
4595 4533 Used merchandise stores 0.7%
4442 4442 Lawn and garden equipment and supplies stores 0.7% 5324 5324 Machinery and equipment rental and leasing 0.7% 5615 5615 Travel arrangement and reservation services 0.6% 4582 4482 Shoe stores 0.6%
4453 4453 Beer, wine, and liquor stores 0.6%
4412 4412 Other motor vehicle dealers 0.6%
8122 8122 Death care services 0.5%
5322 5322 Consumer goods rental 0.5%
4583 4483 Jewelry, luggage, and leather goods stores 0.4% 4232 4421 Furniture stores 0.4%
8112 8112 Electronic equipment repair and maintenance 0.4% 8114 8114 Household goods repair and maintenance 0.3%
4592 4512 Book stores and news dealers 0.3%
4593 4531 Florists 0.2%
5323 5323 General rental centers 0.1%
Sources: BLS, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Fourth Quarter 2022.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 18 Table 2.3: Definition of Industries for Office Prototype NAICS
Code
(2022)
NAICS
Code
(2017) Description
Percent Total
Workers in
Prototype
5613 5613 Employment services 9.3%
6211 6211 Offices of physicians 6.8%
5511 5511 Management of companies and enterprises 6.1%
5415 5415 Computer systems design and related services 6.0% 5617 5617 Services to buildings and dwellings 5.3%
5416 5416 Management and technical consulting services 4.5% 5221 5221 Depository credit intermediation 4.3%
5413 5413 Architectural and engineering services 3.9%
5242 5242 Insurance agencies and brokerages 3.2%
5241 5241 Insurance carriers 2.9%
5411 5411 Legal services 2.8%
5412 5412 Accounting and bookkeeping services 2.7%
6213 6213 Offices of other health practitioners 2.7%
6214 6214 Outpatient care centers 2.5%
6212 6212 Offices of dentists 2.4%
5616 5616 Investigation and security services 2.4%
5417 5417 Scientific research and development services 2.2% 5419 5419 Other professional and technical services 2.0% 5313 5313 Activities related to real estate 1.9%
5614 5614 Business support services 1.9%
7223 7223 Special food services 1.7%
5132 5112 Software publishers 1.5%
5311 5311 Lessors of real estate 1.5%
5611 5611 Office administrative services 1.5%
5171 517 Wired and wireless telecommunications (except satellite) 1.5% 5239 523 Other financial investment activities 1.4%
5222 5222 Non-depository credit intermediation 1.4%
5418 5418 Advertising, pr, and related services 1.2%
5182 5182 Data processing, hosting and related services 1.2% 5231 523 Securities, commodity contracts, investments 1.1% 3345 3345 Electronic instrument manufacturing 1.0%
5121 5121 Motion picture and video industries 1.0%
3344 3344 Semiconductor and electronic component mfg. 0.9% 5312 5312 Offices of real estate agents and brokers 0.9% 3391 3391 Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing 0.8% 5619 5619 Other support services 0.8%
6215 6215 Medical and diagnostic laboratories 0.8%
5223 5223 Activities related to credit intermediation 0.8% 5131 5111 Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishers 0.7% 5192 5191 Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information services 0.4% 3341 3341 Computer and peripheral equipment mfg. 0.4%
5612 5612 Facilities support services 0.4%
5414 5414 Specialized design services 0.4%
3353 3353 Electrical equipment manufacturing 0.3%
5161 515 Broadcasting, except internet 0.3%
3342 3342 Communications equipment manufacturing 0.2%
5178 517 All other telecommunications 0.1%
5331 5331 Lessors of nonfinancial intangible assets 0.1% 5122 5122 Sound recording industries 0.1%
5259 5259 Other investment pools and funds 0.0%
5174 517 Satellite telecommunications 0.0%
5232 523 Securities and commodity exchanges 0.0%
Sources: BLS, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Fourth Quarter 2022.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 19 Table 2.4: Definition of Industries for Industrial (Business Park, Light Industrial) Prototype
NAICS
Code
(2022)
NAICS
Code
(2017) Description
Percent Total
Workers in
Prototype
5613 5613 Employment services 7.1%
6211 6211 Offices of physicians 5.2%
5511 5511 Management of companies and enterprises 4.7%
5415 5415 Computer systems design and related services 4.6% 2382 2382 Building equipment contractors 4.4%
5617 5617 Services to buildings and dwellings 4.0%
5416 5416 Management and technical consulting services 3.4% 5221 5221 Depository credit intermediation 3.3%
5413 5413 Architectural and engineering services 3.0%
5242 5242 Insurance agencies and brokerages 2.4%
5241 5241 Insurance carriers 2.2%
5411 5411 Legal services 2.2%
5412 5412 Accounting and bookkeeping services 2.1%
6213 6213 Offices of other health practitioners 2.0%
6214 6214 Outpatient care centers 1.9%
6212 6212 Offices of dentists 1.9%
5616 5616 Investigation and security services 1.8%
2381 2381 Building foundation and exterior contractors 1.8% 2361 2361 Residential building construction 1.7%
5417 5417 Scientific research and development services 1.7% 5419 5419 Other professional and technical services 1.6% 2362 2362 Nonresidential building construction 1.6%
2383 2383 Building finishing contractors 1.5%
5313 5313 Activities related to real estate 1.5%
5614 5614 Business support services 1.4%
2389 2389 Other specialty trade contractors 1.4%
7223 7223 Special food services 1.3%
5132 5112 Software publishers 1.2%
5311 5311 Lessors of real estate 1.1%
5611 5611 Office administrative services 1.1%
5171 517 Telecommunications 1.1%
2371 2371 Utility system construction 1.0%
5222 5222 Nondepository credit intermediation 1.0%
3363 3363 Motor vehicle parts manufacturing 1.0%
3116 3116 Animal slaughtering and processing 1.0%
5418 5418 Advertising, pr, and related services 0.9%
5182 5182 Data processing, hosting and related services 0.9% 3345 3345 Electronic instrument manufacturing 0.8%
3323 3323 Architectural and structural metals mfg. 0.7% 3344 3344 Semiconductor and electronic component mfg. 0.7% 5312 5312 Offices of real estate agents and brokers 0.7% 3231 3231 Printing and related support activities 0.7%
2373 2373 Highway, street, and bridge construction 0.6% 3254 3254 Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing 0.6% 3327 3327 Machine shops and threaded product mfg. 0.6%
3391 3391 Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing 0.6% 3118 3118 Bakeries and tortilla manufacturing 0.6%
Sources: BLS, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Fourth Quarter 2022.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 20 NAICS
Code
(2022)
NAICS
Code
(2017) Description
Percent Total
Workers in
Prototype
5619 5619 Other support services 0.6%
6215 6215 Medical and diagnostic laboratories 0.6%
3121 3121 Beverage manufacturing 0.6%
5223 5223 Activities related to credit intermediation 0.6% 5131 5111 Newspaper, book, and directory publishers 0.6% 3399 3399 Other miscellaneous manufacturing 0.5%
3339 3339 Other general purpose machinery manufacturing 0.5% 3329 3329 Other fabricated metal product manufacturing 0.5% 3119 3119 Other food manufacturing 0.5%
3219 3219 Other wood product manufacturing 0.5%
3371 3371 Household and institutional furniture mfg. 0.4% 5621 5621 Waste collection 0.4%
3273 3273 Cement and concrete product manufacturing 0.4% 5192 5191 Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information services 0.3% 3114 3114 Fruit and vegetable preserving and specialty 0.3% 3335 3335 Metalworking machinery manufacturing 0.3%
3115 3115 Dairy product manufacturing 0.3%
3359 3359 Other electrical equipment and component mfg. 0.3% 5612 5612 Facilities support services 0.3%
5414 5414 Specialized design services 0.3%
3332 3332 Industrial machinery manufacturing 0.2%
2379 2379 Other heavy construction 0.2%
5161 515 Broadcasting, except internet 0.2%
3256 3256 Soap, cleaning compound, and toiletry mfg. 0.2% 3324 3324 Boiler, tank, and shipping container mfg. 0.2% 3211 3211 Sawmills and wood preservation 0.2%
3333 3333 Commercial and service industry machinery 0.2% 3212 3212 Plywood and engineered wood product mfg. 0.2% 3272 3272 Glass and glass product manufacturing 0.2%
3149 3149 Other textile product mills 0.1%
2213 2213 Water, sewage and other systems 0.1%
5178 517 All other telecommunications 0.1%
3141 3141 Textile furnishings mills 0.1%
3369 3369 Other transportation equipment manufacturing 0.1% 2372 2372 Land subdivision 0.1%
3322 3322 Cutlery and handtool manufacturing 0.1%
3271 3271 Clay product and refractory manufacturing 0.1% 3343 3343 Audio and video equipment manufacturing 0.0%
5174 517 Satellite telecommunications 0.0%
Sources: BLS, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Fourth Quarter 2022.

Table 2.4: Definition of Industries for Industrial (Business Park, Light Industrial) Prototype Continued
Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 21 Table 2.5: Definition of Industries for Hotel Prototype NAICS Code (2017
and 2022) Description
Percent Total
Workers in Prototype
721 Accommodation 100.0%
Sources: BLS, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Fourth Quarter 2022.

Occupations and Wages
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Industry-occupation matrix was used to identify the occupations associated with the industries that may be housed by each prototype in the preceding tables. Local wage data for Napa County provided by the California Employment Development Department (CA EDD) from the first quarter of 2023 was cross referenced with the identified occupations to estimate the average wages of each occupation associated with each prototype. Table 2.6 through Table 2.9 identify the occupations and annual average wages for each occupation associated with the industries housed in each building prototype, respectively.

Note that the occupations are listed because they are associated with an industry in the national data. This does not mean to imply that each occupation listed in these tables will be found in St.

Helena.

Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 22 Table 2.6: Occupation Mix and Averages for Commercial Prototype SOC Code Occupation Name
Percent
of Total
Average
Annual
Wage
11-1011 Chief Executives 0.0309% $ 280,501
11-1021 General and Operations Managers 2.4179% 151,214 11-2021 Marketing Managers 0.0281% 190,254
11-2022 Sales Managers 0.3207% 147,583
11-3012 Administrative Services Managers 0.0253% 117,406 11-3013 Facilities Managers 0.0111% 108,849
11-3021 Computer and Information Systems Managers 0.0158% 177,434 11-3031 Financial Managers 0.0752% 168,490
11-3051 Industrial Production Managers 0.0376% 153,050
11-3061 Purchasing Managers 0.0079% 130,256
11-3071 Transportation, Storage, and Distribution Managers 0.0451% 114,244 11-3121 Human Resources Managers 0.0107% 140,159
11-9041 Architectural and Engineering Managers 0.0127% 184,318 11-9051 Food Service Managers 0.6699% 83,363
11-9171 Funeral Home Managers 0.0507% 91,053
11-9179 Personal Service Managers, All Other 0.0178% 75,112 11-9199 Managers, All Other 0.0491% 152,458
13-1041 Compliance Officers 0.0115% 84,332
13-1051 Cost Estimators 0.0990% 99,079
13-1071 Human Resources Specialists 0.0899% 83,455
13-1081 Logisticians 0.0162% 87,320
13-1082 Project Management Specialists 0.0384% 104,117
13-1111 Management Analysts 0.0107% 94,775
13-1121 Meeting, Convention, and Event Planners 0.0352% 64,363 13-1151 Training and Development Specialists 0.1208% 73,511 13-1161 Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists 0.1386% 84,475 13-1199 Business Operations Specialists, All Other 0.1128% 76,397 13-2011 Accountants and Auditors 0.1722% 95,030
13-2051 Financial and Investment Analysts 0.0036% 116,172 13-2072 Loan Officers 0.0455% 88,738
13-2099 Financial Specialists, All Other 0.0202% 78,468 15-1211 Computer Systems Analysts 0.0095% 113,293
15-1231 Computer Network Support Specialists 0.0103% 87,114 15-1232 Computer User Support Specialists 0.0748% 79,285 15-1241 Computer Network Architects 0.0024% 122,473
15-1242 Database Administrators 0.0024% 104,872
15-1244 Network and Computer Systems Administrators 0.0214% 105,110 15-1251 Computer Programmers 0.0055% 127,375
15-1252 Software Developers 0.0317% 139,867
15-1253 Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers 0.0055% 142,982 15-1254 Web Developers 0.0083% 107,042
15-1255 Web and Digital Interface Designers 0.0087% 81,008 15-1299 Computer Occupations, All Other 0.0154% 104,269 15-2051 Data Scientists 0.0020% 117,001
17-2071 Electrical Engineers 0.0115% 156,741
17-2072 Electronics Engineers, Except Computer 0.0079% 143,938 17-2112 Industrial Engineers 0.0424% 120,407
Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 23 Table 2.6: Occupation Mix and Averages for Commercial Prototype Continued SOC Code Occupation Name
Percent
of Total
Average
Annual
Wage
17-2141 Mechanical Engineers 0.0400% 113,678
17-2199 Engineers, All Other 0.0067% 104,550
17-3013 Mechanical Drafters 0.0079% 79,191
17-3023 Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians 0.0059% 82,358 17-3026 Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians 0.0079% 80,084 17-3027 Mechanical Engineering Technologists and Technicians 0.0055% 77,353 23-2093 Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers 0.0063% 90,977 25-3021 Self-Enrichment Teachers 0.0242% 58,100
27-1011 Art Directors 0.0036% 108,485
27-1022 Fashion Designers 0.0020% 96,678
27-1023 Floral Designers 0.1295% 44,071
27-1024 Graphic Designers 0.0281% 76,855
27-1025 Interior Designers 0.0463% 89,949
27-1026 Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers 0.2479% 46,397 27-3031 Public Relations Specialists 0.0226% 96,647
27-4021 Photographers 0.0075% 67,799
29-1041 Optometrists 0.0182% 149,825
29-1051 Pharmacists 0.6113% 172,006
29-1126 Respiratory Therapists 0.0059% 99,846
29-1141 Registered Nurses 0.0131% 152,027
29-1181 Audiologists 0.0059% 114,020
29-2052 Pharmacy Technicians 1.0536% 61,828
29-2057 Ophthalmic Medical Technicians 0.0083% 54,123
29-2081 Opticians, Dispensing 0.0717% 55,837
29-2091 Orthotists and Prosthetists 0.0055% 87,935
29-2092 Hearing Aid Specialists 0.0135% 66,148
31-9011 Massage Therapists 0.1714% 52,720
31-9095 Pharmacy Aides 0.1267% 59,577
31-9099 Healthcare Support Workers, All Other 0.0067% 52,992 33-9032 Security Guards 0.1540% 41,286
33-9099 Protective Service Workers, All Other 0.0083% 40,073 35-1011 Chefs and Head Cooks 0.3049% 77,586
35-1012 First-Line Supervisors of Food Preparation and Serving Workers 3.5653% 51,215 35-2011 Cooks, Fast Food 3.1025% 38,087
35-2012 Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria 0.0253% 51,487 35-2014 Cooks, Restaurant 4.4550% 44,839
35-2015 Cooks, Short Order 0.4375% 42,435
35-2019 Cooks, All Other 0.0313% 41,547
35-2021 Food Preparation Workers 2.4096% 41,233
35-3011 Bartenders 1.4835% 39,885
35-3023 Fast Food and Counter Workers 11.1236% 37,648
35-3031 Waiters and Waitresses 6.5653% 41,202
35-3041 Food Servers, Nonrestaurant 0.0717% 44,317
35-9011 Dining Room and Cafeteria Attendants and Bartender Helpers 0.9166% 37,000 35-9021 Dishwashers 1.2535% 38,662
35-9031 Hosts and Hostesses, Restaurant, Lounge, and Coffee Shop 1.2282% 38,307 35-9099 Food Preparation and Serving Related Workers, All Other 0.2245% 43,564 37-1012 First-Line Supervisors of Landscaping, Lawn Service, and Groundskeeping Workers 0.0107% 73,917 37-2011 Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners 0.4438% 44,181 37-2012 Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners 0.0166% 42,352
37-3011 Landscaping and Groundskeeping Workers 0.1006% 47,118 Agenda Item #11.2.

City of St. Helena Affordable Housing and Commercial Linkage Impact Fee Study 24 Table 2.6: Occupation Mix and Averages for Commercial Prototype Continued SOC Code Occupation Name
Percent
of Total
Average
Annual
Wage
39-1022 First-Line Supervisors of Personal Service Workers 0.1520% 53,849 39-2011 Animal Trainers 0.0384% 48,320
39-2021 Animal Caretakers 0.5939% 39,958
39-3091 Amusement and Recreation Attendants 0.0103% 37,659 39-3093 Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants 0.0075% 42,822 39-4011 Embalmers 0.0158% 59,462
39-4012 Crematory Operators 0.0075% 46,073
39-4021 Funeral Attendants 0.1299% 42,341
39-4031 Morticians, Undertakers, and Funeral Arrangers 0.0978% 55,626 39-5011 Barbers 0.0503% 48,205
39-5012 Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists 1.0817% 43,355 39-5092 Manicurists and Pedicurists 0.4866% 36,154
39-5093 Shampooers 0.0392% 34,523
39-5094 Skincare Specialists 0.1588% 50,463
39-6012 Concierges 0.0218% 43,658
39-9011 Childcare Workers 0.0055% 41,192
39-9031 Exercise Trainers and Group Fitness Instructors 0.0269% 68,252 39-9099 Personal Care and Service Workers, All Other 0.0578% 39,990 41-1011 First-Line Supervisors of Retail Sales Workers 3.2719% 60,565 41-1012 First-Line Supervisors of Non-Retail Sales Workers 0.1544% 91,122 41-2011 Cashiers 10.2022% 37,787
41-2021 Counter and Rental Clerks 0.7273% 48,173
41-2022 Parts Salespersons 0.9011% 45,659
41-2031 Retail Salespersons 10.6738% 44,263
41-3021 Insurance Sales Agents 0.0150% 89,943
41-3031 Securities, Commodities, and Financial Services Sales Agents 0.0190% 81,440 41-3041 Travel Agents 0.1291% 54,359
41-3091 Sales Representatives of Services, Except Advertising, Insurance, Financial Services, and Travel 0.6046% 85,598 41-4011 Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Technical and Scientific Products 0.0265% 107,455 41-4012 Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Except Technical and Scientific Products 0.3753% 94,153 41-9011 Demonstrators and Product Promoters 0.0356% 46,921 41-9031 Sales Engineers 0.0079% 147,125
41-9041 Telemarketers 0.0115% 40,032
41-9099 Sales and Related Workers, All Other 0.1809% 71,302 43-1011 First-Line Supervisors of Office and Administrative Support Workers 0.4133% 74,744 43-2011 Switchboard Operators, Including Answering Service 0.0095% 48,962 43-3011 Bill and Account Collectors 0.0273% 58,444
43-3021 Billing and Posting Clerks 0.0582% 57,825
43-3031 Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks 0.7281% 58,837 43-3051 Payroll and Timekeeping Clerks 0.0301% 62,969
43-3061 Procurement Clerks 0.0230% 51,834
43-4041 Credit Authorizers, Checkers, and Clerks 0.0055% 49,571 43-4051 Customer Service Representatives 1.4135% 47,454 43-4071 File Clerks 0.0162% 47,392
43-4151 Order Clerks 0.0443% 49,375
43-4161 Human Resources Assistants, Except Payroll and Timekeeping 0.0158% 58,414 43-4171 Receptionists and Information Clerks 0.5096% 44,479 43-4181 Reservation and Transportation Ticket Agents and Travel Clerks 0.0519% 44,138 43-4199 Information and Record Clerks, All Other 0.0150% 58,197 43-5021 Couriers and Messengers 0.0063% 43,353
Agenda Item #11.2.