Stanton City Council
January 11, 2022

INITIAL STUDY AND

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

STANTON TOWNHOMES
12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APN 131-422-20
LEAD AGENCY:

CITY OF STANTON
7800 KATELLA AVENUE
STANTON, CA 90680
REPORT PREPARED BY:

BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
2211 S. HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107
HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 92240
OCTOBER 18, 2021
STAN 003
Attachment: F
Click here to return to the agenda

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT NAME: Stanton Townhomes
PROJECT APPLICANT: The Applicant for the proposed project is Mr. Chris Segesman, Bonanni Development, 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120, Huntington Beach, California 92649.

PROJECT ADDRESS: 12200 Beach Boulevard, Stanton, CA 90680.

CITY AND COUNTY: City of Stanton, Orange County
Lead Agency: City of Stanton. The contact information for the Lead Agency is as follows: Jennifer Lilley, AICP, Community and Economic Development Director (714)890-4213. 7800 Katella Ave, City of Stanton, Orange County.

PROJECT: The City of Stanton Community Development Department is reviewing a request submitted by Bonanni Development for the construction of a 3-story, 79-units multi-family residential development located at 12200 Beach Boulevard, near the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Chapman Avenue in the City of Stanton. Other public agencies that will be reviewing the development request include Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site has a zoning designation of Commercial General (CG) with a General Mixed-Use Overlay (GLMX). The General Plan land use designation is General Mixed-Use, which permits the construction of multi-family residential developments. The total floor area for the proposed multi-family residential development wouldbe 123,805 square feet. Surrounding land uses to the proposed project site include: commercial businesses to the north and the south, the Anaheim City Barber Channel to the east, and a regional eight lane arterial roadway to the west. In addition, the proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project applicant is responsible for the design, construction and completion of the parkette as part of their community benefit contribution. As a result, this parkette is an element of the proposed residential development.

FINDINGS: The environmental analysis provided in the attached Initial Study indicates that the proposed project will not result in any significant adverse unmitigable environmental impacts. The initial study identifies potentially significant effects, but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.

For these reasons, the City of Stanton determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed project. The following findings may be made based on the analysis contained in the attachedInitial Study:
● The proposed project will not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish/wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant/animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare/endangered plant/animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. ● The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
● The proposed project will not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

The environmental analysis is provided in the attached Initial Study prepared for the proposed project. The project is also described in greater detail in the attached Initial Study.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section No. Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 7

1.1 Purpose of this Initial Study .................................................................................................... 7

1.2 Initial Study’s Organization.....................................................................................................8

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................... 9

2.1 Project Overview ......................................................................................................................9

2.2 Project Location........................................................................................................................9

2.3 Environmental Setting .............................................................................................................9

2.4 Project Description................................................................................................................. 12

2.5 Discretionary Actions.............................................................................................................22

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ..........................................................................................23

3.1 Aesthetics................................................................................................................................25

3.2 Agriculture & Forestry Resources .........................................................................................29

3.3 Air Quality............................................................................................................................... 31

3.4 Biological Resources ..............................................................................................................39

3.5 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................43

3.6 Energy .....................................................................................................................................47

3.7 Geology & Soils .......................................................................................................................49

3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions....................................................................................................54

3.9 Hazards & Hazardous Materials............................................................................................58

3.10 Hydrology & Water Quality ................................................................................................... 61

3.11 Land Use & Planning..............................................................................................................64

3.12 Mineral Resources..................................................................................................................67

3.13 Noise .......................................................................................................................................69

3.14 Population & Housing............................................................................................................78

3.15 Public Services........................................................................................................................80

3.16 Recreation...............................................................................................................................83

3.17 Transportation........................................................................................................................85

3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... 91

3.19 Utilities....................................................................................................................................95

3.20 Wildfire ...................................................................................................................................99

3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance.................................................................................... 101

4.0 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 103

4.1 Findings ................................................................................................................................ 103

4.2 Mitigation Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 103

5.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................109

5.1 Preparers............................................................................................................................... 109

5.2 References............................................................................................................................. 109 APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS ................................................................................ 113 APPENDIX B NOISE MEASUREMENTS ......................................................................................140 APPENDIX C TRAFFIC STUDY .................................................................................................144

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

SECTION 1 ● INTRODUCTION PAGE 7

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS INITIAL STUDY
The proposed project would include the construction of a 79-unit, multi-family residential development located at 12200 Beach Boulevard. The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site has a zoning designation of Commercial General (CG) with a General Mixed-Use Overlay (GLMX), which permits the construction of multi-family residential developments. The proposed multiple-family residential development will consist of 79-unit townhomes located within fifteen (15) separate buildings that will contain between four to six units in each building. The total floor area for the proposed multi-family residential development would be 123,805 square feet. In addition, the proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project applicant is responsible for the design, construction and completion of the parkette as part of their community benefit contribution. As a result, this parkette is an element of the proposed residential development.

The City of Stanton is the designated Lead Agency for the proposed project and will be responsible for the project’s environmental review. Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, part of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) defines a Lead Agency as the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a projectthat may have a significant effect on the environment.1 The proposed development is considered to be a project pursuant to CEQA. As part of the proposed project’s environmental review, the City of Stanton has authorized the preparation of this Initial Study.2 Although this Initial Study was prepared with consultant support, the analysis, conclusions, and findings made as part of its preparation fully represent the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Stanton, in its capacity as the Lead Agency. The primary purpose of CEQA is to ensure that decision-makers and the public understand the environmental impacts of the proposed project and that the decision-makers have considered such impacts before considering approval of the project. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, additional purposes of this Initial Study include the following:
● To provide the City of Stanton with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), mitigated negative declaration, or negative declaration for the proposed project;
● To facilitate the project’s environmental assessment early in the design and development of the proposed project;
● To eliminate unnecessary EIRs; and,
● To determine the nature and extent of any impacts associated with the proposed project. ● To enable modification of the project to mitigate significant impacts of the project.

The City determined, as part of this Initial Study’s preparation, that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate document for the proposed project’s environmental review pursuant to CEQA. This Initial Study and the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be forwarded to responsible 1 California, State of. California Public Resources Code. Division 13, Chapter 2.5. Definitions. as Amended 2001. §21067. 2 Ibid. (CEQA Guidelines) §15050.

SECTION 1 ● INTRODUCTION PAGE 8

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
agencies, trustee agencies, and the public for review and comment. A 30-day public review period will be provided to allow these agencies and other interested parties to comment on the proposed project and the findings of this Initial Study.33 Questions and/or comments should be submitted to the following contact at the City of Stanton:

Jennifer Lilley, AICP, Community and Economic Development Director City of Stanton Planning Division
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
[email protected]

1.2 INITIAL STUDY’S ORGANIZATION
The following annotated outline summarizes the contents of this Initial Study:
● Section 1 Introduction, provides the procedural context surrounding this Initial Study's preparation and insight into its composition.
● Section 2 Project Description, provides an overview of the existing environment as it relates to the project site and describes the proposed project’s physical and operational characteristics. ● Section 3 Environmental Analysis, includes an analysis of potential impacts associated with the construction and the subsequent operation of the proposed project. ● Section 4 Findings, indicates the conclusions of the environmental analysis and the Mandatory Findings of Significance.In addition, this section includes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).
● Section 5 References, identifies the sources used in the preparation of this Initial Study.

The Appendix includes the air quality impact analysis worksheets, noise measurement worksheets, and the traffic study.
3 California, State of. Public Resources Code section 21091, subdivision (b).

SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 9

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposed project is to construct a three-story multi-family residential development within a 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) site. The proposed multiple-family residential development would consist of 79-unit townhomes located within fifteen (15) separate buildings that will contain between four to six units in each building. The project site has a zoning designation of Commercial General (CG) with a General Mixed-Use Overlay (GLMX), which permits the construction of multi-family residential developments.4 In addition, the proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street.4.The project applicant is responsible for the design, construction and completion of the parkette as part of their community benefit contribution. As a result, this parkette is an element of the proposed residential development. The project is described in greater detail in Section 2.4 herein.

2.2 PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located within the General Mixed-Use (GLMX) boundaries of the City of Stanton which is located in the northwestern portion of Orange County. The City of Stanton is bounded to the north by the cities of Buena Park and Fullerton; to the east by the City of Anaheim; to the south by the City of Westminster and Garden Grove; and Cypress and Cerritos to the west.5 Major geographical features around the City include the Pacific Ocean approximately 7 miles southwest, Coyote Hills located approximately 8 miles north and the Anaheim and Chino Hills Mountains approximately 12 miles from the project site. The generaltopography ofthe project site and the surroundingarea are level due to being part ofthe coastal plane.

Regional access to the proposed project site is providedby two area highways: The Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22), which extends in an east to west orientation approximately 1.1 miles south of the proposed project site, and Beach Boulevard (SR-39), which extends ina north to south orientation adjacent to the proposed project site.6 The location of the proposed project shown in an area map is provided in Exhibit 2-1.

The project site’s legal address is 12200 Beach Boulevard. The Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) that is applicable to the site is 131-422-20. Major roadways in the vicinity of the project site include Beach Boulevard, which extends along the project site’s west side, and Chapman Avenue, which is located approximately 1,000 feet to the north of the project site. The Orangewood Parkette will be located at the terminus of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The corresponding Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) for the future park will be assigned. A local vicinity map is provided in Exhibit 2-2.

2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site is located within an urbanized area that has been previously developed for its current commercial land use by a recreational vehicle (RV) Help You Sell and ShareMyCoach RV Rental Company sales and storage lot. The majority of the property is paved over with asphalt, and ornamental landscaping on the premises.
4 WHA Architects, Planners, Designers. Architectural Site Plan, Stanton Townhomes. 12200 Beach Boulevard. A1.10. July 22,2020. 5 Google Earth. Website accessed November 17, 2020. Field survey was completed on November 16, 2020. 6 Ibid.

SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 10

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 2-1
PROJECT SITE’S LOCATION IN STANTON
SOURCE: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 11

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 2-2

VICINITY MAP
SOURCE: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 12

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
The project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Stanton. Key land uses located in the vicinity of the proposed project site are outlined below77:
● North of the project site: Adjacent to the north boundary of the proposed project site is a small commercial center comprised of a community health center, liquor store, dine-in restaurants, and other small commercial land uses. To the northeast is a multi-family residential apartment development that is separated from the project area with parking bordering the structures.

Approximately 950-feet north of the proposed project site is the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Chapman Avenue.
● South of the project site: Immediately south of the project site is a commercial business, Beach Auto Glass shop. The Anaheim-Barber City Channel extends along the southern boundary of the proposed project site. A three-story mixed used development is currently under construction approximately 150 feet south of the proposed project site. Land uses southwest are a mix of commercial businesses, wholesale manufactured homes and multi-unit residential developments. ● East of the project site: To the east of the proposed project site, a 25-foot-wide access road divides the property line from the Anaheim-Barber City Channel. Land uses located to the east of this flood control channel consist of single-family residential land uses. ● West of the project site: Abutting west of the proposed project site is Beach Boulevard. Beach Boulevard (SR-39) is a regional eight-lane arterial roadway that extends in a north-to-south orientation connecting the City of Stanton to neighboring communities in Los Angeles and Orange County. Land uses to the west of the project site include a Home Depot, as well as multi-residential uses, churches uses and single-family further west.

The project site is currently occupied by an RV rental commercial business, ShareMyCoach (12200 Beach Boulevard). The project site is shared with another commercial rental business, RV Help You Sell (12200 Beach Boulevard).
88 An aerial photograph of the project site and the surrounding area is provided in Exhibit 2-3. Photographs of the site are provided in Exhibits 2-5 and 2-6. Additionally, a site plan of the proposed Orangewood Parkette is provided in Exhibit 2-4.

2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.4.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Key project elements are summarized below and on the following pages:
● Project Site. The proposed multiple-family residential development will consist of 79-unit townhomes located within fifteen (15) separate buildings that will contain between four to six- plex units in each building configuration. The buildings will be arranged around a central courtyard area. The overall density of the proposed project would be 22.28 dwelling units per acre.9 7 Google Earth. Website accessed November 17, 2020. Field survey was completed on November 16, 2020. 8 Ibid.
9 WHA Architects, Planners, Designers. Architectural Site Plan, Stanton Townhomes. 12200 Beach Boulevard. A1.10. July 22, 2020.

SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 13

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 2-3

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
SOURCE: GOOGLE MAPS
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 14

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 2-4

PARKETTE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
SOURCE: Bonanni Development
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 15

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
View 1: View looking north toward the site across Beach Boulevard.

View 2: View looking south from the site.

EXHIBIT 2-5

PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 16

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
View 3: View looking east with the Anaheim-Barber Channel in the central view.

Figure 4: View of the project site looking north across the Anaheim-Barber Channel (in the foreground).

EXHIBIT 2-6

PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 17

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● Proposed Building. The proposed residential building floor area will be a total of 123,805 square feet. The proposed three-story, 79-unit townhome development would consist of twelve (12) onebedroom units, seven (7) two-bedroom units, and sixty (60) three-bedroom units with a proposed maximum building height of thirty-seven (37)feet. Ten percent of the units (8 units)will be reserved for moderate income households pursuant to the Stanton Municipal Code, Chapter 20, Section 330.
10 ● Parking. The one-bedroom units provide one ground level, enclosed parking space each. Each two and three-bedroom unit would be provided two ground level, enclosed parking spaces (146 spaces in total). A total of 56 open, off-street parking spaces will be provided along the project site’s south side in addition to the 146-garage parking spaces (per unit size). As required, a total of 3 spaces will be provided that are ADA accessible.11
● Access and Circulation. The only public access will be provided by a gated entrance located at the southernmost portion of the site on Beach Boulevard. For emergency access, a secondary gated entrance will be provided on the northern portion of the site along Beach Boulevard. Internal circulation will be facilitated by a 25-foot-wide drive aisle that will provide access to the individual units. Lighting for this project will be provided by FX luminaire fixtures for surface mounting, tight fitting areas and walking paths. Additionally, pole lights and LED string lights will be installed. ● Open Space and Landscaping. Open space will total 34,381 square feet in the form of street trees, ornamental shrubs and ground cover and vines. This open space will be provided along theBeach Boulevard frontage, around the individual buildings, and in the central portion of the development.

The Applicant is proposing an affordable component to the project by applying for an allowable concession and proposing an alternative development standard that would conform to the City of Stanton Municipal Code Section 20.330.040 (Affordability and Density Bonus). The community benefit is the affordable units being proposed.
● Utilities. The Golden State Water District (GSWD) West Orange County System would continue to provide water services to the proposed project site. The proposed project would utilize existing curbs and gutters in adjacent roadways for stormwater runoff collection (storm drain facilities are owned and maintained by the City’s Public Works Department).

The proposed project is summarized in Table 2-1, which is shown below. The proposed site plan is shown in Exhibit 2-7 and the building elevations are provided in Exhibit 2-8 and 2-9.

Table 2-1
Project Summary Table
Project Element Description
Site Area 154,470 sq. ft. (3.5 acres)
No. of Units 79 Condominium Units
Total Building Floor Area 123,805 sq. ft.

Floor Area Ratio (FAR) FAR: 0.80
Maximum Building Height 37 ft.

Landscaping 52,764 sq. ft.

Parking 202 spaces
10 WHA Architects, Planners, Designers. Architectural Site Plan, Stanton Townhomes. 12200 Beach Boulevard. A1.10. July 22,2020. 11 Ibid.

SOURCE: BONANNI DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 18

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 2-7

SITE PLAN OF PROJECT
SOURCE: BONANNI DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 19

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 2-8

PROJECT ELEVATIONS
SOURCE: BONANNI DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 20

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 2-9

PROJECT ELEVATIONS
SOURCE: BONANNI DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 21

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

2.4.2 OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project would consist of a 79-unit townhome development, comprised of twelve (12) onebedroom units, seven (7) two-bedroom units, and sixty (60) three-bedroom units with a maximum building height of thirty-seven (37) feet. These units would be “for sale” owner-occupied units. In addition, ten percent of the total number of units or eight (8) units, would be reserved for moderate income households.

Assumingan average household size of 3.38 persons per household, which corresponds to the most recent U.

S. Censusestimates for the City of Stanton, the proposed development would potentially house up to 267 residents.12

2.4.3 CONSTRUCTION CHARACTERISTICS
The total land area to be developed during the construction of the proposed project is a 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) parcel, located near the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Chapman Avenue in the City of Stanton. The construction for the proposed project would take approximately twelve months to complete.

The construction is anticipated to commence in the beginning of 2022. The key construction phases are outlined below:
● Phase 1 - Grading. The project site would be graded and readied for construction. This phase would require one month to complete.
● Phase 2 - Site Preparation. During this phase, the building footings, utility lines, and other underground infrastructure would be installed. This phase would require one month to complete. ● Phase 3 - Vertical Construction. The new buildings would be constructed during this phase. This phase will take approximately seven months to complete. ● Phase 4 - Paving and Finishing. This phase will involve the paving of the site. This phase will take approximately two months to complete.
● Phase 5 – Landscaping and Finishing. This phase will involve the installation of landscaping and the completion of the on-site improvements. This phase will take approximately one month to complete.

2.4.4DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PARKETTE
The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. No wastewater connections will be required though water connections will be required for irrigation. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. The conceptual design for the Orangewood Parkette includes play structures, a bike rack, seating, trees, and a shaded picnic table. 12 United States Bureau of the Census. Quickfacts [for the] City of Stanton, California.

SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 22

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Key safety implementation measures are outlined below:
• The installation of a second guardrail that is in-line with the westerly curb of Santa Rosalia Street; • The installation of additional warning signage on the guardrail; • The installation of louvers on the traffic lights at Orangewood Avenue; and, • The installation of an oversized, solar-powered blinking stop sign; and “Stop Ahead” stenciling westbound on Orangewood.

2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS
A lead agency issues a discretionary approval when the approval requires the exercise of judgement or deliberation, as distinguished from situations where the lead agency merely has to determine whether there has been conformity with applicable statutes or fixed standards. The City of Stanton is the lead agency for the proposed project, and the project will require the following discretionary approvals from the City:
● The Approval of the Site Plan and Design Review SPDR– 811; ● The Approval of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 20-04, for a stand-alone residential project in the Mixed-Use zone;
● Planned Development Permit (PDP) 20-07, for projects between 51-500 units; ● Development Agreement (DA) 20-04, for project requiring a PDP; ● Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 20-06, for subdivision of land for condominium purposes TTM; and, ● Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND); and the Adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Other City nondiscretionary permits include:
• Demolition permits, grading permits, building permits, and occupancy permits issued by the City of Stanton.

Other permits required by responsible agencies will also include:
• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction permit issued by California State Water Resources Control Board;
• General and Operations Permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SWRCB);
• A Construction Permit issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD); and,
• An encroachment permit from Caltrans for the Beach Boulevard driveways.

SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 23

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
SECTION 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This initial study is prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq.). Specifically, the preparation of an Initial Study is guided by Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines. This format of the study is presented as follows. The project is evaluated based on its effect on 21 major categories of environmental factors. Each factor is reviewed by responding to a series of questions regarding the impact of the project on each element of the overall factor.

The Initial Study checklist provides a formatted analysis that provides a determination of the effect of the project on the factor and its elements. The effect of the project is categorized into one of the following four categories of possible determinations:
● No Impact: No impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. ● Less than Significant Impact: No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, andno mitigation measures are required.
● Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation: Possible significant adverse impacts have been identified or anticipated and the following mitigation measures are required as a condition of project approval to reduce these impacts to a level below significant. The required mitigation measures are: (List of mitigation measures)
● Potentially Significant Impact: Significant adverse impacts have been identified or anticipated.An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required to evaluate these impacts, which are (List ofthe impacts requiring analysis within the EIR).

At the end of the analysis the required mitigation measures are restated and categorized as being eitherselfmonitoring or as requiring a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

The environmental factors checked below will be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics
Biological Resources
Geology/Soils
Hydrology / Water Quality
Noise
Recreation
Utilities / Service Systems
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Cultural Resources
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use/ Planning
Population / Housing
Transportation / Traffic
Wildfire
Air Quality
Energy
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Mineral Resources
Public Services
Tribal Cultural Resources
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 24

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation, the following finding is made:

The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION shall be prepared.

Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there shall not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION shall be prepared.

The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature (prepared by Date
SECTION 3.1 ● AESTHETICS PAGE 25

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.1 AESTHETICS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 
B. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?

C. In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings (public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point)? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? 
D. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?


3.1.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ● No Impact There are no major physiographic features within the vicinity of the project site. Distant views of the Chino Hills and Anaheim Mountains approximately 12 miles to the northeast are obscured by existing commercial and residential developments as well as above ground utility lines located adjacent to Beach Boulevard. The proposed three-story townhome development would have a maximum building height of thirty-seven (37) feet. This development would not affect distant mountain views from nearby developments or the publicright-of-way. The proposed development of the parkette would not require any significant vertical construction that will obstruct any surrounding views. Additionally, the City of Stanton’s General Plan does not list any scenic views within the City. As a result, no impacts will occur.

B. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ● No Impact.

According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the proposed project site is not located near a designated State or County designated scenic highway. The closest designated scenic highway to the project site is a 16-mile segment of the Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) located approximately 7 miles to the southwest of the project site. The project site is paved over in its entirety and previously developed for its current commercial land use with no trees, significant rock outcroppings, or existing structures. The project site does not contain any buildings listed in the State or National registrar (refer tothe discussion under Cultural Resources). Additionally, the parkette is currently paved over with asphalt and will require limited excavation for the installation of the new turf. As a result, no impacts will occur.

SECTION 3.1 ● AESTHETICS PAGE 26

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
C. In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings (public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point)? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? ● No Impact The proposed project site is located in an urbanized area and surrounded by commercial and residential land uses. Distant views of the Chino Hills and Anaheim Mountains approximately 12 miles to the northeast are obscured by existing commercial and residential developments as well as above ground utility lines located adjacent to Beach Boulevard. The proposed three-story townhome development would have a maximum building height of thirty-seven (37) feet. The new project would not affect distant mountain views from nearby developments or the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the proposed development would conform to the applicable development standards within the Municipal Code Chapter 20.530, Site Plan and Design Review. According to the proposed design plan, the development of the parkette would enhance the visual character of the immediate area due to limited excavation and the open space character of the new parkette. The proposed project will not obstruct any views from a public vantage point. As a result, no impacts will occur.

D. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ● Less than Significant Impact Exterior lighting can be a nuisance to adjacent land uses that are sensitive to this lighting. This nuisance lighting is referred to as light trespass, which is typically defined as the presence of unwanted light on properties located adjacent to the source of lighting. A high level of nighttime illumination already exists along Beach Boulevard due to the degree of development in the vicinity of the project area. Project-related sources of nighttime light would be typical of that associated with residential land uses, including parking area lighting, security lighting, and vehicular headlights. Light sensitive land uses that are located in close proximity to the project site include the Beach Creek Resort Apartments, located opposite the project site on the west side of Beach Boulevard; the Su Casa Apartments and the Park Plaza Apartment located to the north of the project site; and asingle-family residential neighborhood located to the south side of the project site on the south side of the Anaheim-Barber City Channel. The proposed development of the Orangewood Parkette is adjacent to residential developments on the northern and southern sides. To the west of the project site is vacant land that is closed off by a permanent wall and secondary fencing due to the presence of functional railroad tracks. The City of Stanton Municipal Code Section 20.300.080, Outdoor Light and Glare, includes the following requirements that are designed to minimize the impacts of outdoor lighting on sensitive uses.
● Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to shield adjacent properties and to not produce glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. ● Parking lot light fixtures and light fixtures on buildings shall be full cut-off fixtures. ● In parking lots, light fixture poles shall not be more than 30 feet in height and lamps shall be high pressure sodium (HPS).
● Street lighting shall be provided in compliance with the requirements of the Department of Public Works.

SECTION 3.1 ● AESTHETICS PAGE 27

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● Flashing, revolving, or intermittent exterior lighting visible from any lot line or street shall be prohibited, except if approved as an accessory feature on a temporary basis in conjunction with a Temporary Use Permit issued in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 20.540, Temporary Use Permits, Annual Advertising Permits and Special Event Permits. ● Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 20.300.080, the average-maintained lighting levels for the proposed project shall not exceed 0.5 foot-candles at lot line boundaries and 1.0 foot-candles at buildings, parking lots, or other areas. The maximum-to-average ratio shall not exceed 2.5 to 1.

Additionally, the project’s light sources would be similar to those of the surrounding land uses.

As previously indicated, the project Applicant will be required to adhere to the abovementioned policies and regulations governing light and glare. Additionally, uses being incorporated within this project would be consistent with surrounding land uses. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant.

3.1.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The potential for cumulative aesthetic impacts is typically site specific. Due to the surrounding area being largely developed, the lighting associated with the projects developments and structures would not substantially increase light and glare in the vicinity of both the project sites. Compliance with Municipal Code regulations would ensure light and glare impacts are less than significant. Potential light-trespass impacts resulting from lighting would be minimized through compliance with all pertinent development standards.

3.1.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The preceding analysis indicated that the projects aesthetic impacts would be less than significant. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

SECTION 3.1 ● AESTHETICS PAGE 28

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 3-1

ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION
SOURCE: BONANNI DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 3.2 ● AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES PAGE 29

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.2AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural uses? 
B. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses, or a Williamson Act Contract? 
C. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?

D. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? 
E. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use?


3.2.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses? ● No Impact.

According to the California Department of Conservation, both of the proposed project sites (the proposed residential development and the parkette) do not contain any areas of Farmland of Statewide Importance, and no agricultural uses are located onsite or adjacent to the properties. The implementation ofthe proposed projects would not involve the conversion of any prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance to urban uses. As a result, no impacts will occur.11 B. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses, or a Williamson Act Contract? ● No Impact.

According to the California Department of Conservation Division of Land Resource Protection, neither the Stanton Townhomes nor the Orangewood Parkette projectsites are subject to a Williamson Act Contract.12 As a result, no impacts on existing Williamson Act Contracts will result from the proposed project’s implementation.
11 California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Farmland Mapping, and Monitoring Program.

California Important Farmland Finder.
12 California Department of Conservation. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/ SECTION 3.2 ● AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES PAGE 30

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
C. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? ● No Impact.

The City of Stanton and the proposed project site are located within a larger built-up urban area.

Specifically, the project site is zoned for General Mixed-Use (GLMX) land uses and is surrounded by urban development. Additionally, the proposed parkette project site is located within an established SingleFamily Residential (RL) zone. As a result, no impacts on forest land or timber resources will result from the proposed projects implementation.

D. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? ● No Impact.

No forest lands are found within the project sites or the adjacent properties. As stated previously, the project sites are located within the General Mixed-Use (GLMX) and Single-Family Residential (RL) zones and are surrounded by urban and residential development. The land use designation that is applicable to the project sites do not provide for the forest land protection. Therefore, no loss or conversion of existing forest lands will result from implementation of the proposed projects. As a result, no impacts will occur.

E. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? ● No Impact.

The proposed projects would not involve the disruption or damage to the existing environment that results in a loss of farmland to nonagricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use because the project sites are not located in close proximity to farmland or forest land. As a result, no impacts will occur.

3.2.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
As indicated in the previous section, both the Stanton Townhomes and Orangewood Parkette projects do not include any farmland uses or forest resources. Asa result,the proposed projects implementation will not lead to a cumulative loss of farmland or forest landresources and no cumulative impacts will occur.

3.2.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of agricultural and forestry resources indicated that no impact on these resources would occur as part of the proposed projects implementation. As a result, no mitigation is required.

SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 31

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.3 AIR QUALITY
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? 
B. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard?

C. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 
D. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?


3.3.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ● Less Than Significant Impact.

The project sites and the City of Stanton are located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The SCAB covers a 6,600 square mile area within Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles County, Riverside County, and San Bernardino County. Air quality in the SCAB is monitored by theSouth Coast Air Quality Management District (SQAQMD) at various monitoring stations throughout the area. Measures to improve regional air quality are outlined in the SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP). The most recent AQMP was adopted in 2017 and was jointly prepared with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The AQMP will help the SCAQMD maintain focus on the air quality impacts of major projects associated with goods movement, land use, energy efficiency, and other key areas of growth. The SCAQMD has established quantitative thresholds of significance for the following criteria of pollutants:
● Ozone (O3) is a nearly colorless gas that irritates the lungs, damages materials, and vegetation.

Ozone is formed by photochemical reaction (when nitrogen dioxide is broken down by sunlight). ● Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless toxic gas that interferes with the transfer of oxygen to the brain and is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels emitted as vehicle exhaust.
● Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) is a yellowish-brown gas, which at high levels can cause breathing difficulties. NOx is formed when nitric oxide (a pollutant from burning processes) combines with oxygen.
● Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfurcontaining fossil fuels. Health effects include acute respiratory symptoms.

SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 32

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● PM10 and PM2.5 refers to particulate matter less than ten microns and two and one-half microns in diameter, respectively. Particulates of this size cause a greater health risk than larger-sized particles since fine particles can more easily cause irritation. ● Reactive Organic Gasses (ROG) refers to organic chemicals that, with the interaction of sunlight photochemical reactions may lead to the creation of “smog.” Projects in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) generating construction-related emissions that exceed any of the following emissions thresholds are considered to be significant under CEQA:
● 75 pounds per day of reactive organic compounds;
● 100 pounds per day of nitrogen oxides;
● 550 pounds per day of carbon monoxide;
● 150 pounds per day of PM10;
● 55 pounds per day of PM2.5; or,
● 150 pounds per day of sulfur oxides.

A project would have a significant effect on air quality if any of the following operational-related emissions thresholds for criteria pollutants are exceeded:
● 55 pounds per day of reactive organic compounds;
● 55 pounds of nitrogen oxides;
● 550 pounds per day of carbon monoxide;
● 150 pounds per day of PM10;
● 55 pounds per day of PM2.5; or,
● 150 pounds per day of sulfur oxides.

According to the SCAQMD, a project is non-conforming if it conflicts with, or delays implementation of any applicable attainment or maintenance plan. A project is conforming if it complies with all applicable District rules and regulations, complies with all proposed control measures that are not yet adopted from the applicable plan(s), and is consistent with the growth forecasts in the applicable plan(s) (or is directly included in the applicable plan). Conformity with growth forecasts may be established by demonstrating that the project is consistent with the land use plan that was used to generate the growth forecast. An example of a non-conforming project would be one that increases the gross number of dwelling units, increases the number of trips, and/or increases the overall vehicle miles traveled in an affected area relative to the applicable land use plan.14
The proposed project involves the construction of a 79-unit multi-family residential development locatedat 12200 Beach Boulevard, near the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Chapman Avenue in the City of Stanton. The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site has a General Plan and Zoning designation for General Mixed-Use (GLMX) land uses, which permits the construction of multi-family 14 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Federal Conformity Guidelines. Report dated August 2016.

SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 33

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
residential developments. The proposed three-story townhomes would consist of twelve (12) one-bedroom units, seven (7) two-bedroom units, and sixty (60) three-bedroom units for a total of seventy-nine (79) new townhome units with a total building footprint of 123,805 square feet.

Projects that are consistent with the projections of employment and population forecasts identified in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) prepared by SCAG are considered consistent with the SCAQMD growth projections, since the RTP/SCS forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the SCAQMD. According to the Growth Forecast Appendix prepared by SCAG for the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, the City of Stanton is projected to add a total of 2,900 new residents and 1,300 new employees through the year 2040.15 The proposed residential development is projected to add 267 new residents to the City. This figure assumes 3.38 people per household, which is the average household size in the City of Stanton according to the U.S. Census. This number of new residents is well within SCAG’s population projections for the City of Stanton (refer to the analysis included in the next section where construction emissions are summarized in Table 3-2). In addition, the proposed project’s long-term (operational) airborne emissions will be below levels that the SCAQMD considers to be a significant impact (the long-term stationary and mobile emissions for the proposed project are summarized in Table 3-3). Additionally, due to the nature of the parkette project, it would not contribute to an increase of residential population and does not interfere with SCAG growth projections set by the City.

Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan and as a result, the impacts will be less than significant.

B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? ● Less than Significant Impact.

According to the SCAQMD, a project results in a significant impact if it triggers or exceeds the SCAQMD daily emissions threshold identified previously and noted at the bottom of Tables 3-1 and 3-2. In general, a project will havethe potential for a significant air quality impact if the project:
● Generates total emissions (direct and indirect) that exceeds the SCAQMD thresholds (the proposed project emissions are less than the thresholds as indicated in Tables 3-1 and 3-2); ● Results in a violation of any ambient air quality standard when added to the local background (the proposed project will not result, in any violation of these standards); ● Does not conform with the applicable attainment or maintenance plan(s) (the proposed project is also in conformance with the City’s Zoning and General Plan designations); and, ● Exposes sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, including those resulting in a cancer risk greater than or equal to 10 in a million and/or a Hazard Index (HI) (non-cancerous) greater than or equal to 1 (the proposed project will not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations nor is the site located near any sensitive receptors).

The proposed project’s construction and operation will not lead to a violation of the above-mentioned criteria. The analysis of daily construction and operational emissions was estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod V.2020.4.0). For air quality modeling purposes, a twelve-month 15 SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS Demographics and Growth Forecast Appendix. December 2015. http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/draft/d2016RTPSCS_DemographicsGrowthForecast.pdf SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 34

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
period of construction for all five phases was assumed. The daily construction emissions are shown in Table 3-1 and operational emissions in pounds per day are shown in Table 3-2.

Table 3-1
Estimated Daily Construction Emissions
Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation (on-site) 3.17 33.08 19.70 0.04 21.27 11.59 Site Preparation (off-site) 0.06 0.04 0.68 -- 0.20 0.05 Total Site Preparation 3.23 33.12 20.38 0.04 21.47 11.64 Grading (on-site) 1.95 20.85 15.27 0.03 8.02 4.29
Grading (off-site) 0.05 0.04 0.57 -- 0.17 0.04
Total Grading 2.00 20.89 15.84 0.03 8.19 4.33
Building Construction (on-site) 1.71 15.62 16.36 0.03 0.81 0.76 Building Construction (off-site) 0.33 0.83 3.58 0.01 1.09 0.30 Total Building Construction 2.04 16.45 19.94 0.04 1.90 1.06 Paving (on-site) 0.92 8.79 12.19 0.02 0.44 0.40
Paving (off-site) 0.06 0.04 0.70 -- 0.22 0.06
Total Paving 0.98 8.83 12.89 0.02 0.66 0.46
Architectural Coating (on-site) 43.23 1.30 1.81 -- 0.71 0.71 Architectural Coating (off-site) 0.06 0.04 0.63 -- 0.20 0.05 Total Architectural Coating 43.29 1.34 2.44 -- 0.91 0.76 Maximum Daily Emissions 43.29 33.13 21.16 0.04 21.47 11.64 Daily Thresholds 75 55 550 150 150 55
Significant Impact? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod V.2020.4.0.

The maximum daily construction emissions derived from the CalEEMod are compared to the SCAQMD’s thresholds in Table 3-1. As indicated in Table 3-1, the maximum daily construction emissions would be significantly below the SCAQMD thresholds. Nevertheless, the Applicant and/or the contractors will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 (nuisance odors) and SCAQMD Rule 403 (fugitive dust). These two SCAQMD Rules require the implementation of Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) for each fugitive dust source, and the Best Available Control Technologies (BACTs) for area sources and point sources. The BACMs and BACTs would include the following; ● Fugitive Dust Prevention. The Applicant/Contractors shall ensure that watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on-going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly (at leasttwice a day).
● Erosion Prevention. The Applicant/Contractors shall ensure that all disturbed areas are treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. The Applicant/Contractors shall ensure that landscaped areas are installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. The Applicant/Contractors shall ensure that all grading activities are suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour.

SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 35

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● Equipment Emissions. During Construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, would increase NOx and PM10 levels in the area.

Long-term emissions refer to those air quality impacts that will occur once the proposed project has been constructed and is operational. These impacts will continue over the operational life of the project. The two main sources of operational emissions include mobile emissions and area emissions related to off-site electrical generation. The analysis of long-term operational impacts summarized in Table 3-2 also used the CalEEMod V.2020.4.1 computer model. The analysis summarized in Table 3-2 indicates that the operational (long-term) emissions will be below the SCAQMD daily emissions thresholds.

Table 3-2
Estimated Operational Emissions in lbs./day
Emission Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area-wide (lbs./day) 35.41 2.68 73.17 0.16 9.51 9.51
Energy (lbs./day) 0.06 0.52 0.52 -- 0.04 0.04
Mobile (lbs./day) 2.96 3.15 30.12 0.07 7.30 1.98
Total (lbs./day) 38.4 6.35 103.5 0.23 16.86 11.53
Daily Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
Significant Impact? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod V.2020.4.0.

The potential long-term (operational) and short-term (construction) emissions associated with the proposed project’s implementation are compared to the SCAQMD’s daily emissions threshold in Table 3-1 and 3-2, respectively. As indicated in these tables, the short and long-term emissions will not exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds. Adherence to the above SCAQMD rules will further reduce the potential construction related impacts to levels that are less than significant.

C. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The SCAQMD requires that CEQA air quality analyses determine whether a proposed project would result in an exceedance of localized emissions thresholds or localized standard thresholds (LSTs). LSTs only apply to short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) emissions at a fixed location and do not include off-site or area-wide emissions. The approach used in the analysis of the proposed project utilized a number of screening tables that identified maximum allowable emissions (in pounds per day) at a specific distance toa receptor. The pollutants that are the focus of the LST analysis include the conversion of NOx to NO2; carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from construction; PM10 emissions from construction; and PM2.5 emissions from construction. According to the SCAQMD, residences, schools, daycare centers, playgrounds, and medical facilities are considered sensitive receptor land uses. Furthermore, fugitive dust emission, which is responsible for PM10 and PM2.5 emissions, will further be reduced through the implementation of SCAQMD regulations related to fugitive dust generation and other construction-related emissions. These SCAQMD regulations are standard conditions required for every construction project undertaken in the City of Stanton as well as in the cities and counties governed by the SCAQMD.

SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 36

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
The nearest sensitive receptors are located approximately 75 feet to the northeast of the project site. The sensitive receptors are shown in Exhibit 3-2. For purposes of the LST analysis, the receptor distance used was 25 meters since sensitive receptors are located approximately 25 meters from the site. The thresholds for five acres were selected for the project even though the project site encompasses 3.55 acres.

Table 3-3
Local Significance Thresholds Exceedance SRA 17 for 5-Acre Sites (the site is 3.55 acres)
Emissions Project Emissions
(lbs./day) Type
Allowable Emissions Threshold (lbs/day) and a
Specified Distance from Receptor (in meters)
25 5o 100 200 500
NO2 33.13 Construction 183 167 180 202 245
CO 21.16 Construction 1,053 1,734 2,498 4,018 9,336
PM10 21.47 Construction 3 10 14 22 45
PM2.5 11.64 Construction 2 3 4 8 27
The emissions generated by the construction of the proposed project will not exceed the LSTs identified above in Table 3-3. Based on the analysis of LST impacts summarized above in Table 3-3, the potential impacts will be less than significant. Further analysis indicated that the primary source of construction PM emissions is fugitive dust. Adherence to the SCAQMD’s Rule 403 will reduce fugitive dust emissions to levels that are less than significant.

D. Would the project result in other emissions (such as odors or dust) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The SCAQMD has identified land uses that are typically associated with odor complaints. These uses include activities involving livestock, rendering facilities, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting activities, refineries, landfills, and businesses involved in fiberglass molding.14 The proposed residential development will not be involved in any of the aforementioned odor-generating activities. Future construction-related trucks must adhere to Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations, which limits the idling of diesel-powered vehicles to less than five minutes. Adherence to the aforementioned standard condition will minimize odor impacts from diesel trucks. In addition, the project’s contractors must adhere to SCAQMD Rule 403 regulations, which significantly reduces the generation of fugitive dust.

Adherence to Rule 403 Regulations and Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. 14 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Appendix 9. As amended 2017.

SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 37

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 3-2

AIR QUALITY SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
SOURCE: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
SECTION 3.3 ● AIR QUALITY PAGE 38

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.3.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The SCAQMD developed the operational thresholds of significance based on the level above which a project’s individual emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the South Coast’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the SCAQMD operational thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution impact. As described in this section, the proposed project’s operational emissions would not exceed thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts.

3.3.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The proposed project's air emissions are not considered to represent a significant adverse impact. As a result, no mitigation measures are required. The analysis of air quality impacts indicated that the projected emissions would be below the SCAQMD’s thresholds of significance and for every construction project undertaken in the City as well as in the cities governed by the SCAQMD would follow the pertinent rules and standard conditions required.

SECTION 3.4 ● BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES PAGE 39

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 
B. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 
C. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on State or Federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?

D. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?

E. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?

F. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?


3.4.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ● No Impact.

The proposed project site is located in an urban area surrounded by commercial and residential developments and is adjacent to a major roadway (Beach Boulevard/SR-39). Additionally, the parkette project site is surrounded by residential developments and is currently paved over with asphalt. There are no naturally occurring habitats or associated flora and fauna located on either project site that would be affected by the proposed projects implementation. As a result, the site is not a suitable habitat for any species of concern by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and no impacts are anticipated.

B. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ● Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation.

According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the results of the site visits, there are no wetland or migratory bird nesting areas located within the project site.15 The only trees located within the project site boundaries are found along the southern and western boundaries of the project site next to SECTION 3.4 ● BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES PAGE 40

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
the Anaheim-Barber Channel. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is responsible for enforcing the Migratory BirdTreaty Act of 1918. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 under US Code, Title 16 Sections 703-712, makes it illegal to take, possess import, export, transport, barter, or offer for sale, purchase, or barter, any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such bird except under the terms of a valid Federal permit. There are a number of mature trees and shrubs located on-site along the southern and western boundaries of the project site which may have the potential to harbor migratory birds. These mature trees and shrubs will be removed during the construction phase to accommodate the proposed project. Nesting and/or migratory species may be impacted by construction activities depending on the time of year. As a result, the following mitigation will be required to reduce potential impacts to nesting and migratory species to a level of less than significant.
● MM-BIO-1: If clearing and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before the construction activities commence. A copy of the report must be provided to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to the start of any work on the project site.

The qualifiedbiologist shall survey the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season. If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall establish a 100-foot noactivity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250-foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance may occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the biologist. The biologist must be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any type of permit for the project.

The proposed development will abide by all migratory and nesting bird protections required by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. Furthermore, the Orangewood Parkette, is not located by any wetland or migratory bird nesting areas and is currently uninhabited by any vegetation. As a result, the project would result in a less than significant impacts with the incorporation of the aforementioned mitigation.

C. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ● No Impact.

No wetland areas or riparian habitats (e.g., wetlands, vernal pools, critical habitats for sensitive species, etc.) were observed on either of the sites (the residential development site and the proposed parkette site) during the field investigations.19Additionally, no offsite wetland habitats would be affected by the proposed developments since the project’s construction would be limited to the proposed project sites. As a result, less than significant impacts are anticipated.

D. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ● No Impact.

The project site has no utility as a wildlife migration corridor due to the proposed site location adjacent to a major roadway and in the midst of an urban area. The Anaheim-Barber City Channel is located directly southeast of the project site and is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a riverine habitat. This segment of the flood control channel has been paved over in its entirety and is an unsuitable habitat or, SECTION 3.4 ● BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES PAGE 41

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
wildlife corridor for any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species.18The project area is surrounded on all sides by urban and residential developments. Similarly, the proposed parkette project site has been disturbed, paved over and is deemed an unfit habitat or, wildlife migration corridor due to being adjacent to railroad tracks and surrounded by residential developments. Given the urban character of the adjacent parcels and the disturbed character of the project sites, no impacts will occur.

E. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ● No Impact Title 12, Chapter 12.20 of the Stanton Municipal Code addresses the City’s Street Tree Plan, and no street tress would be impacted by the proposed project. The only trees located within the project site boundaries are found along the southern and western boundary of the project site next to the Anaheim-Barber Channel and Beach Boulevard. Furthermore, there would be an incorporation of additional trees and no need for any tree replacement or preservation requirements that would be applicable to the proposed project. There are no mature trees located on the parkette site that would be displaced. As a result, no impacts on this issue would result from the projects implementation.

F. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ● No Impact.

The project sites (the proposed residential development and the parkette) and the surrounding areas are urban and residential land uses that are located within Orange County’s Transportation Authority, Natural Community Conservation Plan, and Habitat Conservation Plan regions. The proposed project’s implementation would not bein conflict with the provisions of any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community ConservationPlan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plans. Therefore, no impacts will occur.

3.4.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
All the related projects in the area would be subject to individual project review and conformance with conservation plans and standard provisions for compliance with the state and federal protection laws. Since project-related impacts would be less than significant, cumulative projects would also be required to follow suit, and the cumulative impact from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects would be expected to be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be less than significant.

3.4.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
Nesting and/or migratory species may be impacted by construction activities depending on the time of year.

As a result, the following mitigation will be provided to reduce potential impacts to nesting and migratory species.

MM-BIO-1 (Biological Resources Impacts). If clearing and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before the construction activities commence. A copy of the report must be provided to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to the start of any work on the project site.

The qualified biologist shall survey the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place SECTION 3.4 ● BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES PAGE 42

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season.If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall establish a 100-footno-activity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250-foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance may occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the biologist. The biologist must be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any type of permit for the project.

SECTION 3.5 ● CULTURAL RESOURCES PAGE 43

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines?

B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines?

C. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? 

3.5.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? ● No Impact.

Historical resources are generally defined by Local, State, and Federal criteria. A site or structure may be historically significant if it is locally protected through a General Plan or historic preservation ordinance.

In addition, a site or structure may be historically significant according to State or Federal criteria even if the locality does not recognize such significance. The State of California, through the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), also maintains an inventory of those sites and structures that are considered to be historically significant. Finally, the U.S. Department of the Interior has established specific guidelines and criteria that indicate the manner in which a site, structure, or district is to be identified as having historic significance. To be considered eligible for the National Register, a property’s significance may be determined if the property is associated with events, activities, or developments that were important in the past, with the lives of people who were important in the past, or represents significant architectural, landscape, or engineering elements. Ordinarily, properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years are not considered eligible for the National Register. Buildings and properties will qualify for a listing on the National Register if they are integral parts of districts that meet certain criteria. Specific criteria outlined in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 used to evaluate the significance of a historical or cultural resource includes the following:
● A resource listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Pub. Res. Code §5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et seq.).
● A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. ● Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, SECTION 3.5 ● CULTURAL RESOURCES PAGE 44

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the lead agency's determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

A search of the National Register of Historic Places and the list of California Historical Resources was conducted for the City.21 There are no recorded structures in the National Register of Historic Places or the California Historical Resources list within the City of Stanton. The proposed development will be limited to the project site and will not affect any structures or historical resources listed on the National or State Register or those identified as being eligible for listing on the National or State Register. Furthermore, the project site is not present on the list of historic resources identified by the State Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO).22 Since the project’s implementation will not impact any Federal, State, or locally designated historic resources, no impacts will occur.

B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? ● Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation.

The first occupants of the Southern California area migrated into the region thousands of years prior to the arrival of Europeans. The Southern California area was first occupied by Native Americans who were the descendants of the hunting and gathering peoples that migrated from Asia into North America. The time period in which these early peoples were first established in the Southern California region is uncertain, though there is archaeological evidence that a fully maritime-adapted, seafaring culture existed in Southern California at least ten thousand years ago. On the mainland, discoveries at Rancho La Brea and the recovery of artifacts at Malaga Cove on Santa Monica Bay, suggest a long history of occupation for the region.16 The greater Los Angeles Basin was previously inhabited by the Gabrieleño-Kizh people, named after the San Gabriel Mission.17 The Gabrieleño tribe has lived in this region for around 7,000 years.18 Prior to Spanish contact, approximately 5,000 Gabrieleño people lived in villages throughout the Los Angeles Basin.19 The early anthropologist and ethnographer, J. P. Harrington, noted the presence of two Indian settlements located in what is now Buena Park along Coyote Creek. Both sites are located at least five miles from the project site.20 Another encampment was recorded in the Brea Canyon area. As part of the AB-52 2021CEQA Statues and Guidelines. Section 15064.5. 2019. Website accessed November 20, 2020. https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/2019_CEQA_Statutes_and_Guidelines.pdf 21 California State Parks, Office of Historic Preservation. Listed California Historical Resources. Website accessed November 20, 2020.
16 McCawley, William. The First Angelinos, The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. 1996. 17 Tongva People of Sunland-Tujunga. Introduction. http://www.lausd.k12.ca.us/Verdugo_HS/classes/multimedia/intro.html 18 Ibid.
19 Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden. Tongva Village Site. http://www.rsabg.org/tongva-village-site-1 20 McCawley, William. The First Angelinos, The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. 1996.

SECTION 3.5 ● CULTURAL RESOURCES PAGE 45

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
requirements, local Native American groups were contacted for further information. The GabrielinoTongva Tribe indicated that the project area is located within the Tribe’s ancestral territory but has no specific information regarding cultural resources in the immediate vicinity. However, the Tribe considers the area to be sensitive for cultural resources, and requests the following mitigation measure:
● MM-CUL-1: The project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitorduring construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities thatinclude, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community Development Director. The monitor will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities.

The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed,or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

The potential impacts will be less than significant with adherence to the aforementioned mitigation.

C. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? ● Less than Significant Impact.

There are no dedicated cemeteries located in the vicinity of the project site.21 The nearest dedicated cemetery is Magnolia Memorial Park, located approximately 1.5 miles from the project site. The proposed project will be restricted to the project site and therefore will not affect any dedicated cemeteries.

Notwithstanding, the following mitigation is mandated by California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15064.5(b)(4):
“A lead agency shall identify potentially feasible measures to mitigate significant adverse changes in the significance of an historical resource. The lead agency shall ensure that any adopted measures to mitigate or avoid significant adverse changes are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures.”
Additionally, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 Healthy and Safety Code states:
“In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner of the county in which the human remains are discovered has determined, in accordance with Chapter 10 (commencing with (b) Section 27460) of Part 3 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the Government Code, that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code or any other related provisions of law concerning investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative.

The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person SECTION 3.5 ● CULTURAL RESOURCES PAGE 46

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission.” Adherence to the aforementioned standard condition will ensure potential impacts remain at levels that are less than significant.

3.5.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The potential cumulative impacts on cultural resources are typically site specific. Furthermore, the analysis determined that the proposed project would not result in any unmitigable impacts on cultural resources.

As a result, no cumulative impacts on cultural resources are anticipated.

3.5.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential cultural resources impacts indicated that the project site’s previous disturbance would limit the potential for cultural resources or human remains to be discovered within the project site.

Nevertheless, the following mitigation measure is provided below and in Section 3.18 (Tribal Cultural Resources) to ensure that a tribal representative is present during construction-related ground-disturbing activities.

MM-CUL-1 (Cultural Resources). The project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor during construction-related ground disturbanceactivities. Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community Development Director. The monitor will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

SECTION 3.6 ● ENERGY PAGE 47

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.6 ENERGY
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation?

B. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? 

3.6.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The City of Stanton is reviewing an application submitted for the construction ofa 79-unit multi-family residential development located at 12200 Beach Boulevard. In addition, the proposed project will also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette known as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. Electricity in the City of Stanton is provided by Southern California Edison Company (SCE). Natural gas service in the City is provided by Southern California Gas Company (SCGC). SCGC maintains medium pressure facilities in nearly every street of the City. As indicated in Table 3-4, the project is estimated to consume approximately 1,217.5 kilowatt (kWh) per year of electricity and 10,423 cubic feet of natural gas on a daily basis. Limited electrical consumption is anticipated for the parkette. The energy consumption will be limited to electricity consumption for the exterior safety lighting.

Table 3-4
Estimated Annual Energy Consumption
Project Consumption Rate Total Project
Existing Conditions (154,470 sq. ft.)
Electrical Consumption 0.50 kWh/sq. ft./year 211.6 kWh/day Natural Gas Consumption -- --
Proposed Project (assumes 79-units)
Electrical Consumption 5,625 kWh/unit/year 1,217.5 kWh/day Natural Gas Consumption 4,011 cu. ft/unit/month 10,423 cu. ft./day Net Change
Electrical Consumption 1,005.9 kWh/day
Natural Gas Consumption 10,423 cu. ft./day
Source: Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company.

SECTION 3.6 ● ENERGY PAGE 48

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
The existing uses currently consume an average of 21.6 kWh of electricity daily with little or no natural gas consumption. The majority of this existing consumption is related to on-site security lighting. As shown in Table 3-4, the project will result in an increase of 1,005.9 kWh per day in electrical consumption and an increase of 10,423 cubic feet per day of natural gas consumption.

It is important to note that the project will be constructed in compliance with Part 6 and Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. Part 6 of Title 24 requires the installation of fixtures and appliances that are certified to the Energy Commission such as windows, indoor and outdoor lighting, doors, appliances, water heaters, and insulation. The use of these materials will ensure the project’s energy consumption is kept at levels that are considered to be less than significant, especially insulation, which allows buildings to retain heat or cooler indoor temperatures. In addition, Southern California Edison will be able to accommodate the development. Nevertheless, the proposed project will be required to adhere to the policy identified in the City’s Climate Action Plan that requires project to be 20 percent more efficient than existing code requirement. For all of the foregoing reasons, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact relating to consumption of energy.

B. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ● Less Than Significant Impact.

In 2019, the State Building Standards Commission adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code (Code) which became effective on January 1, 2020. The California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective to aid efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. Title 24 now requires that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant‐emitting finish materials. The 2016 version of the standards became effective as of January 1, 2017. The proposed project will conform to all pertinent energy conservation requirements. As a result, the potential impacts will be less than significant.

3.6.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The potential cumulative impacts on energy are programmed and planned for in the energy master plans prepared by the utility providers (the Southern California Edison Company and South California Gas Company). These utility providers work with the local jurisdictions and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to develop their long-range energy plans. As part of this planning process, the utility providers review the local general plans to develop growth projections. As a result, no cumulative impacts on energy impacts are anticipated.

3.6.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis determined that the proposed project will not result in significant impacts related to energy and mitigation measures are not required.

SECTION 3.7 ● GEOLOGY & SOILS PAGE 49

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.7 GEOLOGY & SOILS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; strong seismic ground shaking; seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; or landslides?

B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 
C. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?

D. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (2012), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? 
E. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?

F. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 

3.7.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; strong seismic ground shaking; seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; or landslides? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The City of Stanton is located within a seismically active region. Many major and minor local faults traverse the entire Southern California region and earthquakes from several active and potentially active faults in the Southern California region could affect the project site. In 1972, the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zoning Act was passed in response to the damage sustained in the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake. The AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act's main purpose is to prevent the construction of buildings used for human occupancy on the surface trace of active faults. There are no active faults identified by the State within the project site, nor is the project site within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Although the site is within a seismically active region prone to occasional damaging earthquakes, there are no Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation in the vicinity of the project area.

SECTION 3.7 ● GEOLOGY & SOILS PAGE 50

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
The closest earthquake fault zone defined by the Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, is the Los Alamitos fault, which is located approximately three miles to the west of the proposed project site. The proposed project would comply with the 2019 California Building Standards code and Municipal Code Section 16.36.010, which are effective in minimizing any potential seismic-related impacts to structures.

Surface ruptures are visible instances of horizontal or vertical displacement, or a combination of both. The amount of ground shaking depends on the intensity of the earthquake, the duration of shaking, soil conditions, types of building, and distance from epicenter or fault. Other potential seismic issues include ground failure and liquefaction. Ground failure is the loss in stability of the ground and includes landslides, liquefaction, and lateral spreading. According to the United States Geological Survey, liquefaction is the process by which water-saturated sediment temporarily loses strength and acts as a fluid following seismic activity. According to California Department of Conservation Earthquake Hazard Zone maps, the project sites (both the proposed residential development site and the parkette), along with the entire City, are located in an area that is subject to potential liquefaction. The risk for liquefaction is no greater on-site than it is for the surrounding City and this portion of Orange County. The groundwater is estimated to be 20- feet below the ground surface according to Orange County Water District.

A geotechnical study was performed by Group Delta (April 26, 2021) that outlined both the liquefaction characteristics and the requisite design measures that would be required to address the liquefaction for the proposed project. These measures would include 1. the construction of conventional shallow spread footings or mat foundations with ground improvement would be required to reduce or remove liquefaction‐induced settlement; 2. the installation of a mat foundation would be required that is structurally designed to accommodate total static and seismic settlements of up to 4inches; and 3. the construction of deep foundations would be required, consisting of grouped 16‐inch diameter auger displacement piles (ACD) with either a slab on grade (prone to significant damage following a seismic event with liquefaction triggered) or a structural slab designed to resist liquefaction‐induced settlements between the pile groups.

The aforementioned geotechnical report concluded that the project is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided that recommendations presented in the report were implemented during design and construction phases of the proposed project. In addition, the proposed project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC which would be verified through the plan check and permitting process. With compliance with existing regulations, the potential impacts related to seismically related ground failure and liquefaction would be less than significant. Additionally, the project site is not subject to the risk of landslides because there are no hills or mountains within the vicinity of the project site. As a result,the potential impacts in regard to ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides are less than significant.

B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ● Less than Significant Impact.

According to the University of California, Davis SoilWeb database, the soils association that underlies the project site belong to the Hueneme-San Emigdio-Bolsa soil complex.27 The project site is level and limited grading will be required for structural supports, building foundations, and utility lines. All grading activities will require grading permits from the City, which include requirements and standards designed to reduce potential erosion impacts. These requirements will effectively mitigate potential stormwater runoff impacts during construction. The project site is currently level and will remain level following the site’s 27 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey. Website accessed November 20, 2020.
28 Ibid.

SECTION 3.7 ● GEOLOGY & SOILS PAGE 51

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
development. The surface grades within the parking and internal roadways will be designed to facilitate drainage into the nearest curbs and gutters. The implementation will conform to national pollution discharge elimination system (NPDES) guidelines, a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and be in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403. As a result, the impacts will be less than significant.

C. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The project’s construction will not result in soil erosion since the project’s contractors must implement the construction best management practices (BMPs) identified in the mandatory SWPPP. The BMPs will minimize soil erosion and the discharge of sediment off-site. The proposed project would be in conformance with Municipal Code Section 16.55.014 for a site specific soil and engineering geology report to help reduce the possibility of liquefaction due to ground shaking. As stated in Subsection B, a geotechnical study was performed by Group Delta (April 26, 2021) that outlined both the liquefaction characteristics and the requisite design measures that would be required to address the liquefaction for the proposed project. Additionally, the project site is not located within an area that could be subject to landslides because there are no hills or mountains in the vicinity of the project site.28 The soils that underlie the project site possess a low potential for shrinking and swelling given the site’s developed character. The soils that underlie the site may be subject to liquefaction in the event of a major earthquake though this characteristic is the same for the entire City (refer to Exhibit 3-3). The project’s construction would require adherence to all pertinent construction related requirements related to the site’s preparation and the actual construction of the units. In addition, the proposed project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC which would be verified through the plan check and permitting process. With compliance with existing regulations, the potential impacts related to seismically related ground failure and liquefaction would be less than significant. The likelihood of lateral spreading will be further reduced since the project’s implementation will not require grading and excavation that would extend to depths required to encounter groundwater. Moreover, the project will not result in the direct extraction of groundwater. As a result, the potential impacts are will be less than significant.

D. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (2012), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? ● Less than Significant Impact.

By definition, expansive soils are soils that expand when water is added and shrink when they dry out. The University of California, Davis SoilWeb database was consulted to determine the nature of the soils that underlie the project site. According to the University of California Davis SoilWeb database, the project site is underlain by the Hueneme-San Emigdio-Bolsa soil complex.29 None of the soils identified are classified as expansive soils. In addition, the applicant is required to adhere to all requirements detailed by the USDA and California Building Code Chapter 18 Soils and Foundations, resulting in potential impacts which would be less than significant.

SECTION 3.7 ● GEOLOGY & SOILS PAGE 52

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 3-3

GEOLOGIC HAZARDS MAP
SOURCE: CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
SECTION 3.7 ● GEOLOGY & SOILS PAGE 53

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
E. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ● No Impact.

No septic tanks will be used for the proposed residential project since the new development will be connected to the sanitary sewer system. The proposed parkette will not include any restrooms or water or sewer connections. As a result, no impacts associated with the use of septic tanks will occur as part of the proposed project’s implementation.

F. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ● No Impact
Results of an on-line paleontological resources record search through the University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP) database indicate that there are no known vertebrate fossil localities that have been previously identified within the vicinity of the project site. Additionally, the UCMP database shows surface deposits in the proposed project area are composed entirely of younger Quaternary alluvium. This younger Quaternary alluvium is unlikely to contain significant vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers.

The very limited and shallow excavations associated with the proposed project’s construction are not likely to yield significant vertebrate fossil remains. As a result, no impacts will occur.

3.7.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The potential cumulative impacts related to earth and geology are typically site specific. The analysis herein determined that the proposed project’s impacts of geology would be less than significant. The proposed project’s construction will not result in any significant impacts related to landform modification, grading, or the destruction of a geologically significant landform or feature. In addition, the future development would not be exposed to any unique and adverse geological and soils effects including fault rupture, ground shaking, seismic-induced ground failure, liquefaction, and landslides. The existing development standards would ensure that the incremental geological effects of the proposed project would not result in greater adverse cumulative effects. As a result, the cumulative impacts of the proposed project, related to geology and soils, would be less than cumulatively considerable.

3.7.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis determined that the proposed project will not result in significant impacts related to paleontological resources and no mitigation measures are required. The proposed project will be required to comply with the provision outlined in the CBC governing seismic building code requirements and the recommendations outlined in the geotechnical report prepared for the project. 29 UC Davis. Soil Web. https://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/gmap/ SECTION 3.8 ● GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS PAGE 54

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?

B. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?


3.8.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The State of California requires CEQA documents to include an evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or gases that trap heat in the atmosphere. Examples of GHG that are produced both by natural and industrial processes include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The accumulation of GHG in the atmosphere regulates the earth's temperature. Without these natural GHG, the Earth's surface would be about 61°F cooler.22 However, emissions from fossil fuel combustion have elevated the concentrations of GHG in the atmosphere to above natural levels. These man-made GHG will have the effect of warming atmospheric temperatures with the attendant impacts of changes in the global climate, increased sea levels, and changes to the worldwide biome. They major GHG that influence global warming are described below.
● Water Vapor. Water vapor is the most abundant GHG present in the atmosphere. While water vapor is not considered a pollutant, while it remains in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in the atmospheric concentration of water vapor is directly related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. As the temperature of the atmosphere rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warmer, the relative humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to “hold” more water when it is warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a GHG, the higher concentration of water vapor is then able to absorb more thermal indirect energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the atmosphere. When water vapor increases in the atmosphere, more of it will eventually also condense into clouds, which are more able to reflect incoming solar radiation. This will allow less energy to reach the Earth’s surface thereby affecting surface temperatures.
● Carbon Dioxide (CO2). The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean. Manmade sources of CO2 include the burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. Since the industrial revolution began in the mid‐1700’s, these activities have increased the atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Prior to the industrial revolution, concentrations 22 California, State of. OPR Technical Advisory – CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. June 19, 2008.

SECTION 3.8 ● GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS PAGE 55

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
were fairly stable at 280 parts per million (ppm). The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report, 2014) Emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes contributed about 78% of the total GHG emissions increase from 1970 to 2010, with a similar percentage contribution for the increase during the period 2000 to 2010. ● Methane (CH4). CH4 is an extremely effective absorber of radiation, although its atmospheric concentration is less than that of CO2. Methane’s lifetime in the atmosphere is brief (10 to 12 years), compared to some other GHGs (such as CO2, N2O, and Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). CH4 has both natural and anthropogenic sources. It is released as part of the biological processes in low oxygen environments, such as in swamplands or in rice production (at the roots of the plants). Over the last 50 years, human activities such as growing rice, raising cattle, using natural gas, and mining coal have added to the atmospheric concentration of methane. Other human-related sources of methane production include fossil‐fuel combustion and biomass burning. ● Nitrous Oxide (N2O). Concentrations of N2O also began to increase at the beginning of the industrial revolution. In 1998, the global concentration of this GHG was documented at 314 parts per billion (ppb). N2O is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel‐fired power plants, nylon production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions) also contribute to its atmospheric load. It is also commonly used as an aerosol spray propellant.
● Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC). CFCs are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane (C2H6) with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the Earth’s surface). CFCs have no natural source but were first synthesized in 1928. It was used for refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. Due to the discovery that they are able to destroy stratospheric ozone, a global effort to halt their production was undertaken and in 1989 the European Community agreed to ban CFCs by 2000 and subsequent treaties banned CFCs worldwide by 2010. This effort was extremely successful, and the levels of the major CFCs are now remaining level or declining. However, their long atmospheric lifetimes mean that some of the CFCs will remain in the atmosphere for over 100 years.
● Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC). HFCs are synthetic man‐made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Out of all the GHGs, they are one of three groups with the highest global warming potential. The HFCs with the largest measured atmospheric abundances are (in order), HFC‐23 (CHF3), HFC‐134a (CF3CH2F), and HFC‐152a (CH3CHF2). Prior to 1990, the only significant emissions were HFC‐23. HFC‐134a use is increasing due to its use as a refrigerant. Concentrations of HFC‐23 and HFC‐134a in the atmosphere are now about 10 parts per trillion (ppt) each.

Concentrations of HFC‐152a are about 1 ppt. HFCs are manmade and used for applications such as automobile air conditioners and refrigerants.
● Perfluorocarbons (PFC). PFCs have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower atmosphere. High‐energy ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers above Earth’s surface are able to destroy the compounds. Because of this, PFCs have very long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. Two common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane (CF4) and hexafluoroethane (C2F6). Concentrations of CF4 in the atmosphere are over 70 ppt. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing.

SECTION 3.8 ● GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS PAGE 56

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6). SF6 is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas.

SF6 has the highest global warming potential of any gas evaluated; 23,900 times that of CO2.

Concentrations in the 1990s were about 4 ppt. Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection.

The State of California requires CEQA documents to include an evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and gases that trap heat in the atmosphere. GHG are emitted by both natural processes and human activities. Examples of GHG that are produced both by natural and industrial processes include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The SCAQMD has recommended several GHG thresholds of significance. These thresholds include 1,400 metric tons of CO2E (MTCO2E) per year for commercial projects, 3,500 MTCO2E per year for residential projects, 3,000 MTCO2E per year for mixed-use projects, and 10,000 MTCO2E per year for industrial projects. Table 3-5 summarizes annual greenhouse gas (CO2E) emissions from build-out of the proposed project. Carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2E, is a term that is used for describing different greenhouse gases in a common and collective unit. As indicated in Table 3-5, the CO2E total for the construction phase of the project is 334.88 MTCO2E per year.

This translates into an annual long-term emission of 1,343.94 MTCO2E, which is below the aforementioned thresholdfor residential projects. The emissions are much lower when amortized over a 30-year project lifetime.

Table 3-5
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Source
GHG Emissions (MT/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2E
Construction Phase - Demolition 34.0 -- 0.00 34.2
Construction Phase - Site Preparation 8.36 -- 0.00 8.43 Construction Phase - Grading 10.42 -- 0.00 10.51
Construction Phase - Construction 263.00 0.06 0.00 264.58 Construction Phase - Paving 14.74 -- 0.00 14.86
Construction Phase - Coatings 2.30 -- 0.00 2.3
Total Construction Emissions 332.82 0.06 0.00 334.88
Long-term Area Emissions 40.51 0.04 -- 41.80
Long-term Energy Emissions 215.15 0.01 -- 216.34
Long-term Mobile Emissions 1,002.61 0.06 0.04 1,017.38
Total Long-term Emissions 1,301.03 1.07 0.05 1,343.94
Source: CalEEMod V.2020.4.0.

Accordingly, because the proposed project’s annual emissions will not exceed the above referenced threshold, the proposed project’s impacts are less than significant.

B. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases? ● No Impact.

AB-32 requires the reduction of GHG emissions to 1990 levels, which would require a minimum 28% in "business as usual" GHG emissions for the entire State. Additionally, Governor Edmund G. Brown signed into law Executive Order (E.O.) B-30-15 on April 29, 2015, the Country’s most ambitious policy for reducing SECTION 3.8 ● GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS PAGE 57

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Executive Order B-30-15 calls for a 40% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2030. The proposed Residential redevelopment project will not involve or require any variance from an adopted plan, policy, or regulation governing GHG emissions. As a result, no potential conflict with an applicable greenhouse gas policy plan, policy, or regulation will occur and no impacts will occur.

C. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases? ● No Impact.

AB-32 requires the reduction of GHG emissions to 1990 levels, which would require a minimum 28% in "business as usual" GHG emissions for the entire State. Additionally, Governor Edmund G. Brown signed into law Executive Order (E.O.) B-30-15 on April 29, 2015, the Country’s most ambitious policy for reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Executive Order B-30-15 calls for a 40% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2030. The proposed Residential redevelopment project will not involve or require any variance from an adopted plan, policy, or regulation governing GHG emissions. As a result, no potential conflict with an applicable greenhouse gas policy plan, policy, or regulation will occur and no impacts will occur.

3.8.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
GHG impacts are exclusively considered to be cumulative impact since there are no “non-cumulative” GHG emission impacts from a global warming or climate change perspective. As discussed in the previous section (section 3.8.1), the proposed project’s emissions would be below SCAQMD’s threshold of 3,500 MTCO2E per year for residential projects with projected emissions for the project at 1,703.98 MTCO2E. Thus, the proposed project’s cumulative contribution to GHG emissions would be less than significant.

3.8.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

SECTION 3.9 ● HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PAGE 58

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.9 HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?

B. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?

C. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 
D. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?

E. Would the project for a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?

F. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

G. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?


3.9.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ● No Impact.

A hazardous material is defined as any material that, due to its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to environment if released into the environment. Hazardous materials include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, and any material that regulatory agencies have a reasonable basis for believing would be injuries to the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the home, workplace, or environment. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential to damage public health and the environment. Due to the residential nature of the proposed project, the use of any hazardous materials will be limited to those that are commercially available and typically used in a residential setting for routine cleaning and maintenance. The project’s construction would require the use of diesel fuel to power the construction equipment. The diesel fuel would be properly sealed in tanks and would be transported to the site by truck. Other hazardous materials that would be used on-site during the project’s construction phase include, but are not limited to, gasoline, solvents, architectural coatings, and equipment lubricants. These products are strictly controlled and regulated and in the event of any spill, cleanup activities would be required to adhere to all pertinent protocols. The United SECTION 3.9 ● HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PAGE 59

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
States Environmental Protection Agency’s multi-system search was consulted todetermine whether the project site is identified on any Federal or State hazardous site list. The project siteis not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Hazardous Waste and Substances database. In addition, the proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. Since the project will not require the transport or disposal of hazardous materials, no impacts will result from the project’s implementation. Once in operation, the proposed project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impacts will result upon project implementation. As a result, less than significant impacts will occur.

B. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ● No Impact.

During construction activities, requirements must be adhered to regarding the transport and handling of fuels and lubricants for the construction equipment used on-site. In the event of a fuel spill, the contractors will be required to adhere to all pertinent requirements related to the cleaning up of any spilled fuels to prevent further contamination of the nearby environment. In addition, these materials are regulated by Federal and State requirements that would be implemented City during the construction activities. These regulations include: the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and Hazardous Materials Transportation Act; Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CalOSHA), and the State Unified Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Regulatory Program. Once occupied and due to, the proposed development’s residential nature, the use of any hazardous materials will be limited to those that are commercially available and typically used in a residential setting for routine cleaning and maintenance. Therefore, the proposed project will not create a hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment through the routine use or transport of hazardous materials during the project’s constructions and occupancy.

C. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ● No Impact.

The proposed residential and parkette project would not involve the transport, use, or disposal of any hazardous materials. The nearest sensitive receptor is Wakeman Elementary School located approximately

0.4 miles southeast of the proposed project site. As a result, the proposed project will not create a hazard to any localschool within a one-quarter mile of the project site and no impacts are anticipated.

D. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ● No Impact.

Government Code Section 65962.5 refers to the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List, commonly known as the Cortese List. The Cortese List is a planning document used by the State and other local agencies to comply with CEQA requirements that require the provision of information regarding the location of hazardous materials release sites. A search of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor and the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker websites determined that the residential project site is not identified as a Cortese site.32 The proposed parkette would occupy a former SECTION 3.9 ● HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PAGE 60

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
dead-end street where the existing pavement will be removed and replaced with turf. Therefore, no impacts will occur.

E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? ● No Impact.

The project site is not located within two miles of a public use airport. The nearest airport is the Long Beach Municipal Airport, located approximately 12 miles west of the project site. As a result, the proposed project will not present a safety or noise hazard related to aircraft or airport operations at a public use airport to people working in the project site. As a result, no impacts related to this issue will occur.

F. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ● No Impact.

The nearest emergency evacuation route in proximity to the project site is Beach Boulevard (SR-39). At no time will the aforementioned emergency evacuation routes or any adjacent streets be completely closed to traffic during the proposed project’s construction. As a result, no impacts are associated with the proposed project’s implementation.

G. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? ● No Impact.

The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site is located within an urbanized area that has been previously developed for its current commercial land use as a recreational vehicle (RV) sales and storage lot. In addition, the proposed 7,600 square foot parkette site is surrounded by urban development. The majority of both properties are paved over with asphalt, with little ruderal vegetation on the premises. The proposed residential parcel has a General Plan and Zoning designation for General Mixed-Use (GLMX) land uses, which permits the construction of multi-family residential developments. The proposed residential project site is surroundedby commercial and residential land uses and adjacent to a major roadway (Beach Boulevard/SR-39). According to the Cal FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Database, the project site is not located within a severefire hazard zone.33 As a result, no impacts will occur.

3.9.2CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The analysis determined the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to hazards or hazardous materials that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from related projects in the area and, as a result, the proposed project would not result in cumulatively considerable hazards or hazardous materials impacts.

3.9.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.
32 CalEPA. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup (Cortese List).http://www.dtsc.ca.govList.cfm. 33 CalFire. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map Viewer. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ SECTION 3.10 ● HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY PAGE 61

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.10 HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?

B. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?

C. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner in which would result in flooding onor off-site; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or, impede or redirect flood flows?

D. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?  E. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?


3.10.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) established regulations governing the discharge of pollutants to waters of the U.S. from any point source. The CWA also has established a framework for regulating nonpoint source stormwater discharges under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The proposed project would be required to implement storm water pollution control measures pursuant to the NPDES requirements. The contractors would also be required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) utilizing Best Management Practices to control or reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable during construction activities. The WQMP will also identify post-construction best management practices (BMPs) that will bethe responsibility of the contractors to implement over the life of the project.

Prior to issuance of any grading permit for the project that would result in soil disturbance of one or more acres of land, the Applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under California's General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board, and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing shall be provided to the Chief Building Official and the City Engineer. In addition, the contactors would be SECTION 3.10 ● HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY PAGE 62

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
required to prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would be submitted to the Chief Building Official and City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

Additionally, a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit for County will be required for this project. With the above-mentioned standard conditions, the impacts would be reduced to levels that are considered to beless than significant. The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project will involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

B. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? ● Less than Significant Impact.

A search was conducted through the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s on-line database Geotracker to identify the presence of any natural underground water wells within the project site. The search yielded no results. In addition, the proposed project will be connected to the City’s utility lines and will not deplete groundwater supplies. Since there are no underground wells on-site that would be impacted by the proposed development, no impacts will occur.

No new direct construction-related impacts to groundwater supplies, or groundwater recharge activities would occur as part of the proposed project’s implementation. Water used to control fugitive dust will be transported to the site via truck. No direct ground water extraction will occur. Furthermore, the construction and post-construction BMPs will address contaminants of concern from excess runoff, thereby preventing the contamination of local groundwater. Water used for indoor irrigation will be transported to the project site and will be stored in an above ground water reservoir tank. As a result, there would be no direct groundwater withdrawals associated with the proposed project’s implementation. As a result, the impacts are considered to be less than significant.

C. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner in which would result in flooding on- or off-site; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or, impede or redirect flood flows? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The project’s construction will be restricted to the designated project site and the project will not alter the course of any stream or river that would lead to on- or off-site siltation or erosion. The existing project site’s condition is currently paved and conveys water runoff to existing storm drains. No significant grading and/or excavation into the local aquifer will occur. No additional undisturbed land will be affected. As a result, the potential impacts will be less than significant.

SECTION 3.10 ● HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY PAGE 63

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
D. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ● No Impact.

As indicated previously, the impervious surfaces (asphalt, building slabs, etc.) that will be constructed will result in the generation of storm water runoff. However, the project will be properly drained and is not expected to result in flooding on-or off-site. A City approved drainage plan will be used, which will ensure that the site will be designed so that storm water runoff will continue to be directed to the curbs and gutters on the adjacent roadways or storm drain inlets. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance maps obtained for the City of Stanton, the proposed project site is located in Zone X.34 Thus, properties located in Zone X are not located within a 100-year flood plain. A tsunami is defined as a long high sea wave caused by an earthquake or other disturbance. Similarly, a seiche is defined as a temporary disturbance or oscillation in the water level of a lake or partially enclosed body of water. The proposed project site is not located in an area that is subject to inundation by seiche or tsunami. In addition, the project siteis located inland, and the project site would not be exposed to the effects of a tsunami.35 As a result, no impacts are anticipated.

E. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? ● No Impact.

The proposed project’s construction and operation will comply with the City of Stanton Water Quality Management Plan per Chapter 20.500.090 of the Stanton Municipal Code. Compliance with the ordinance will help minimize the discharge and transport of pollutants associated with the new development though the control of volume and rate stormwater runoff, therefore preventing any potential violations or inconsistencies with the local requirements. As a result, the construction impacts will be less than significant. In addition, the project’s operation will not interfere with any groundwater management or recharge plan because there are no active groundwater management recharge activities on-site or in the vicinity. As a result, no impacts are anticipated.

3.10.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACT
The potential impacts related to hydrology and storm water runoff are typically site specific. BMP’s will be implemented at the project level for individual developments and standards. The analysis within the previous section concluded there will be no significant adverse hydrological or water quality impacts. As a result, no cumulative impacts are anticipated.

3.10.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
As indicated previously, hydrological characteristics will not substantially change as a result of the proposed project. As a result, no mitigation is required.
34 Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Mapping Program. 2020. 35 Google Earth. Website accessed November 20, 2020.

SECTION 3.11 ● LAND USE & PLANNING PAGE 64

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.11 LAND USE & PLANNING
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project physically divide an established community?  B. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?


3.11.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project physically divide an established community? ● No Impact.

Both the residential and parkette sites are located within the southern portion of the City of Stanton adjacent to Beach Boulevard. The project site is currently developed as a recreational vehicle (RV) rental commercial business, ShareMyCoach (12200 Beach Boulevard) and is shared with another commercial rental business, RV Help You Sell (12200 Beach Boulevard). The project site has a General Plan and Zoning designation of General Mixed-Use (GLMX) land uses. Key land uses located in thevicinity are described below:
● North of the project site: Adjacent to the north boundary of the proposed project site is a small commercial center comprised of a community health center, liquor store, dine-in restaurants, and other small commercial land uses. To the northeast is a multi-family residential apartment that is separated from the project area with parking bordering the structures. Approximately 950-feet north of the proposed project site is the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Chapman Avenue. ● South of the project site: Immediately south of the project site is a commercial business, Beach Auto Glass shop. The Anaheim-Barber City Channel continues along the southern boundary of the proposed project site. A three-story mixed-use development is currently under construction approximately 150 feet south of the proposed project site. Land uses southeast are a mix of commercial businesses, wholesale manufactured homes and multi-unit residential developments. ● East of the project site: To the east of the proposed project site, a 25-foot-wide access road divides the property line from the Anaheim-Barber City Channel. Land uses located to the east of this flood control channel consist of single-family residential land uses. ● West of the project site: Abutting west of the proposed project site is Beach Boulevard. Beach Boulevard (SR-39) is a regional eight-lane arterial roadway which extends in a north-to-south orientation connecting the City of Stanton to neighboring communities in Los Angeles and Orange County. Land uses to the west of the project site include a Home Depot, as well as multi-residential uses and single-family residential developments further west.

This issue is specifically concerned with the expansion of an inconsistent land use into an established neighborhood. The proposed project will be confined within the project site’s boundaries. As previously SECTION 3.11 ● LAND USE & PLANNING PAGE 65

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
stated, the project site currently serves as an RV commercial business and is surrounded by various commercial and residential land uses, contributing to a cohesiveness and enhancement of the existing community. The granting of the requested entitlements and subsequent construction of the proposed project will not result in any expansion of use beyond the current boundaries. The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project will involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette. As a result, the project will not lead to any division ofan existing established neighborhood and no impacts will occur.

B. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ● No Impact.

As indicated in the previous subsection, the proposed residential redevelopment project will not require the approval of either a Zone Change or a General Plan Amendment. The project site is located within a General Mixed-Use (GLMX) Zone which is designated under the General Plan to provide a balance of residential, commercial, recreational, etc. facilities that will encourage land uses that maximize economic development and enhance the quality of life of the citizens. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning land use designations that are applicable to the project site. Refer to Table 3-6 for the City of Stanton’s General Plan and Zoning development standards and the proposed project’s requests. As a result, no impacts will occur.

Table 3-6
Development Standards for Mixed-Use Overlay Zones
Development Features Mixed Use Overlay Zone
Standards
Proposed Project’s
Standards
Front Setback 0 ft (min); 15 ft (max).

Street Side Setback 5 ft (min); 15 ft (max). 10 ft.

Interior Side Setback 10 ft min; No max. 10 ft.

Rear Setback 10 ft min; No max. 18 ft.
# of Stories 3 max. 3
Maximum Height 45 ft. max. 37 ft.

Source: City of Stanton Municipal Code.

3.11.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
If implemented, the proposed site would not conflict with any applicable land use regulations, land use policies, or applicable land use plans. Therefore, the proposed project would not contribute towards any cumulative land use impacts nor contribute to a cumulative impact or result in land use conflicts. Therefore, the project’s impacts are not considered cumulatively considerable, and no mitigation is required.

3.11.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis determined that no impacts on land use and planning would result upon the implementation of the proposed project. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

SECTION 3.11 ● LAND USE & PLANNING PAGE 66

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 3-4

LAND USE MAP
SOURCE: CITY OF STANTON
SECTION 3.12 ● MINERAL RESOURCES PAGE 67

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State?

B. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?


3.12.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? ● No Impact.

A review of California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources well finder indicates that there are no wells located in the vicinity of the project site.36 The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) has developed mineral land classification maps and reports to assist in the protection and development of mineral resources. According to the SMARA, the following four mineral land use classifications are identified:
● Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1): This land use classification refers to areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.
● Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ-2): This land use classification refers to areas where adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that a high likelihood for their presence exists.
● Mineral Resource Zone 3 (MRZ-3): This land use classification refers to areas where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be evaluated from the available data. Hilly or mountainous areas underlain by sedimentary, metamorphic, or igneous rock types and lowland areas underlain by alluvial wash or fan material are often included in this category. Additional information about the quality of material in these areas could either upgrade the classification to MRZ-2 or downgraded it to MRZ-1.
● Mineral Resource Zone 4 (MRZ-4): This land use classification refers to areas where available information is inadequate for assignment to any other mineral resource zone.

Both the proposed residential development site and the parkette site are located within Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1) within the City of Stanton, which indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present in the area and it has been judged that little
36 California, State of. Department of Conservation. California Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Well Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#openModal/-117.41448/34.56284/14.

SECTION 3.12 ● MINERAL RESOURCES PAGE 68

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
likelihood exists for their presence. In addition, there are no active mineral extraction activities occurring on-site or in the adjacent properties. As a result, no impacts to mineral resources will occur.

B. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? ● No Impact.

As previously mentioned, no mineral, oil, or energy extraction and/or generation activities are located within either the proposed residential development site or the parkette site. Moreover, the proposed project will not interfere with any resource extraction activity. Therefore, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed project.

3.12.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The proposed project would not result in any direct or indirect impacts related to mineral resources. The implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of an area designated for mineral resource extraction and would not prevent the ability to use any other areas for such purpose. As stated in the previous section, the proposed project site has not been used for mineral resource recovery and is not dedicated as a mineral resource recovery site on any land use plans. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to the loss of mineral resources. As a result, no cumulative impacts related to mineral resources would occur.

3.12.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential impacts related to mineral resources indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the approval of the proposed project and its subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 69

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.13 NOISE
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?

B. Would the project result in generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? 
C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or- an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?


3.13.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ● Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation
Sound is mechanical energy transmitted by pressure waves through the air and is characterized by various parameters that include sound frequency, the speed of propagation, and the pressure level or energy content (amplitude). Noise is most often defined as unwanted sound. Noise levels may be described using a number of methods designed to evaluate the "loudness" of a particular noise. The most commonly used unit for measuring the level of sound is the decibel (dB). Zero on the decibel scale represents the lowest limit of sound that can be heard by humans. At the other extreme, the eardrum may rupture at 140 dB. The noise levels associated with everyday activities are noted in Exhibit 3-5.

The human ear can detect changes in sound levels greater than 3.0 dBA under normal ambient conditions.

Changes ofless than 3.0 dB are noticeable to some people under quiet conditions while changes of less than

1.0 dB are only discernible by few people under controlled, extremely quiet conditions. Though in general, an increase of between 3.o dB and 5.o dB in the ambient noise level is considered to represent the threshold for humansensitivity. Noise levels may also be expressed as dBA where an “A” weighting has been incorporated into the measurement metric to account for increased human sensitivity to noise. The A-weighted measurements correlate well with the perceived nose levels at lower frequencies.

SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 70

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Noise Levels – in dBA
Seri
sonic boom
jet take off at 200 ft.

Di
Thr
music in night club interior
motorcycle at 20 ft.
power mower
freight train at 50 ft.
food blender
electric mixer, light rail train horn
portable fan, roadway traffic at 50 ft.
dishwasher, air conditioner
normal conversation
refrigerator, light traffic at 100 ft.
library interior (quiet study area)
rustling leaves
EXHIBIT 3-5

TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS
SOURCE: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
165
160
ous Injury 155
150
145
140
Pain
135
130
125
120
scomfort
115
110
105
100
95 90
Physical
Injury
85 80
75 70
65 60
55 50
45 40
35 30
eshold of
Hearing
25 20
15 10
5 0
SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 71

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Noise may be generated from a point source, such as machinery, or from a line source, such as a roadway segment containing moving vehicles. Because the area of the sound wave increases as the sound gets further and further from the source, less energy strikes any given point over the surface area of the wave. This phenomenon is known as “spreading loss.” Due to spreading loss, noise attenuates (decreases) with distance. Stationary, or point, noise subject to spreading loss experiences a 6.0 dBA reduction for every doubling of the distance beginning with the initial 50-foot distance.23 Noise emanating from travelling vehicles, also referred to as a line source, decreases by approximately 3.0 dBA 50 feet from a source over a hard, unobstructed surface such as asphalt, and by approximately 4.5 dBA over a soft surface, such as vegetation. For every doubling of distance thereafter, noise levels drop another 3.0 dBA over a hard surface and 4.5 dBA over a soft surface.24
Time variation in noise exposure is typically expressed in terms of the average energy over time (called Leq), or alternatively, as a statistical description of the sound level that is exceeded over some fraction of a given observation period. For example, the L50 noise level represents the noise level that is exceeded 50% of the time. Half the time the noise level exceeds this level and half the time the noise level is less than this level.

Other values that are typically noted during a noise survey include the Lmin and Lmax that represent the minimum and maximum noise levels obtained over a given period, respectively. Noise sensitive receptors located in the vicinity of the proposed project site are described below:
● Receptor #1 North of the project site: Park Plaza, a multiple-family development, is located to the northeast of the project site. The apartment’s garages are located just north of the property line.

The apartment buildings are located approximately 84 feet to the north of the property line. ● Receptor #2 South/East of the project site: Land uses located to the southeast, south of the Barber City Channel, are single family homes. At their closest point to the site, these units are located approximately 95-feet from the property line. A three-story mixed-use development is currently under construction approximately 150 feet south of the proposed project site. ● Receptor #3 West of the project site: A multi-residential development is located approximately 130 feet west of the project site. The receptor is separated from the project by Beach Boulevard.

The ambient noise environment is dominated by traffic noise from Beach Boulevard. To characterize the existing noise environment, a series of onsite noise measurements were taken. An Extech Model 407730 Digital Sound Meter was used to conduct the noise measurements. A series of 100 discrete intervals were recorded at two separate locations (referred to herein as Location 1 and Location 2). Location 1 was situated along the west side of Beach Boulevard. Location 2 was positioned within the central portion of the parcel located at 12345 Beach Boulevard. The measurements were captured five feet above the ground surface.

The measurements taken at Locations 1 and 2 were collected at Location 2 werecaptured free from any obstructions. The measurements were taken on a Monday morning at 9:45 AM. Table 3-7 indicates the variation in noise levels over time during the measurement period. As indicated previously, the L50 noise level represents the noise level that is exceeded 50 percent of the time. Half the time the noise level exceeds this level and half the time the noise level is less than this level. The average noise levels during the measurement period were 66.5 dBA for Location 1 and 60.5 dBA for Location 2. The noise measurement worksheets are included in Appendix B.
23 United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Report dated September 2018.

SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 72

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Table 3-7
Noise Measurement Results
Noise Metric
Noise Level
(dBA) for
Location 1
Noise Level
(dBA) for
Location 2
Lmax (Maximum Noise Level) 93.1 dBA 66.3 dBA
L99 (Noise levels <99% of time) 77.1 dBA 65.6 dBA
L90 (Noise levels <90% of time) 73.3 dBA 63.5 dBA
L75 (Noise levels <75% of time) 70.5 dBA 61.8 dBA
L50 (Noise levels <50% of time) 66.9 dBA 60.5 dBA
Lmin (Minimum Noise Level) 52.2 dBA 54.3 dBA
Average Noise Level 66.5 dBA 60.5 dBA
Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.

Measurements were taken in December 2019.

Noise generated within the City of Stanton is regulated under Title 9, Chapter 9.28 - Noise Control of the City’s Municipal Code. Chapter 9.28 of the City’s Municipal Code contains both general noise regulations and noise regulations specific to construction. According to Section 9.28.070(e) of the Municipal Code, noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property are exempt from the City’s noise control regulations provided the construction activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. The City’s Noise Control Ordinance referenced above does not establish numeric maximum acceptable construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified determination of what CEQA constitutes a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase.

Thus, the construction noise thresholds from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment were used to establish a significant construction noise threshold impact if construction noise exceeds 80 dBA at sensitive receptors. In addition, Chapter 9.28 outlines specific interior and exterior dBA limits within residential zones. As indicated in Section 9.28.050(a), exterior noise levels within residential zoned properties are restricted to 55 dBA between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.

Exterior noise levels within residential zoned properties are further restricted to 50 dBA between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Section 9.28.050(b) of the Municipal Code states:
“It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the city to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, when the foregoing causes the noise level, when measured on any other residential property, either incorporated or unincorporated, to exceed:
● The noise standard for a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour; ● The noise standard plus five dBA for a cumulative period of more than fifteen minutes in any hour;
● The noise standard plus ten dBA for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in any hour; The noise standard plus fifteen dBA for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any hour; or
24 United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Report dated September 2018.

SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 73

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● The noise standard plus twenty dBA for any period of time.” Section 9.28.060(a) establishes interior noise standards for residential land uses. According to that Section of the Municipal Code, interior noise levels within residential zoned properties are restricted to 55 dBA between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Interior noise levels within residential zoned properties are further restricted to 45 dBA between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Furthermore, Section

9.28.060(b) of the Municipal Code states:
“It is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the city to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, when the foregoing causes the noise level when measured within any other dwelling unit on any residential property, either incorporated or unincorporated, to exceed:
● The interior noise standard for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in any hour; ● The interior noise standard plus five dBA for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any hour; or
● The interior noise standard plus ten dBA for any period of time.” Construction activities would generate perceptible noise levels during the demolition, grading, paving, and building construction phases. Relatively high groundborne noise levels noise levels would be generated by the operation of heavy-duty trucks, backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, scrapers, and other heavy duty construction equipment. Table 3-8, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment, indicates the anticipated noise levels from specific types of construction equipment. Point sources of noise emissions are attenuated by a factor of 6 dBA per a doubling of distance from the noise source.

Table 3-8 then indicates the anticipated construction noise levels for the selected construction equipment types at the three sensitive receptors discussed previously. As indicated in the Table, Receptor #1 is 84 feet from the nearest construction activity, Receptor #2 is construction 95 feet, and Receptor #3 is 130 feet. The noise levels were adjusted under the three “receptor” columns to take into account the spreading loss due to distance. For example, the noise levels for Receptor #1 were adjusted by a -3 dBA from the actual Lmax at 50 feet. The noise levels for Receptor #2 were adjusted by a +1 dBA from the actual Lmax at 100 feet though in reality the difference would be negligible. The noise levels for Receptor #3 were adjusted by a -3 dBA from the actual Lmax at 100 feet. As indicated previously, the construction noise thresholds were taken from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. A significant construction noise threshold impact if construction noise exceeds 80 dBA at a sensitive receptor.

As indicated in the Table, there is a potential for this significant impact when graders and tractors are being used next to the property lines near Receptors #1, and #2. These occurrences are noted using bold lettering in Table 3-8. These noise levels could intermittently occur for a few days when construction equipment is operating closest to the residential uses. The remainder of the time, the construction noise levels would be much less because the equipment would be working further away from the existing sensitive uses. 25 California Department of Transportation. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol – Table 7-1 FHWA Building Noise Reduction Factors. Report dated 2013.
26 Ibid.

SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 74

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Table 3-8
Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment Construction
Equipment
Actual Lmax
@27 ft.

Actual Lmax
@50 ft.

Actual Lmax
@100 ft.

Receptor #1
Lmax
84 ft.

Receptor #2
Lmax
95 ft.

Receptor #3
Lmax
130 ft.

Backhoe 83 dBA 78 dBA 72 dBA 75 dBA 73 dBA 69 dBA
Bulldozer/Compactor 87 dBA 82 dBA 76 dBA 79 dBA 77 dBA 73 dBA Concrete Mixer 84 dBA 79 dBA 73 dBA 77 dBA 74 dBA 70 dBA Concrete Pump 86 dBA 79 dBA 73 dBA 77 dBA 74 dBA 70 dBA Crane, Mobile 86 dBA 81 dBA 75 dBA 79 dBA 76 dBA 72 dBA Dump Truck 81 dBA 76 dBA 70 dBA 73 dBA 71 dBA 67 dBA
Excavator 86 dBA 81 dBA 75 dBA 79 dBA 76 dBA 72 dBA
Grader 90 dBA 85 dBA 79 dBA 82 dBA 80 dBA 76 dBA
Loader 84 dBA 79 dBA 73 dBA 76 dBA 74 dBA 70 dBA
Paver 82 dBA 77 dBA 71 dBA 74 dBA 72 dBA 68 dBA
Roller 85 dBA 80 dBA 76 dBA 77 dBA 77 dBA 73 dBA
Tractor 89 dBA 84 dBA 78 dBA 81 dBA 79 dBA 75 dBA
Truck, Flatbed 79 dBA 74 dBA 68 dBA 71 dBA 69 dBA 65 dBA Source: Bugliarello, et. al., The Impact of Noise Pollution, Chapter 127, 1976 As indicated previously, construction activities undertaken within the City are exempt from the provisions outlined in Chapter 9.28 of the City’s Municipal Code. As indicated previously, the City’s Noise Control Ordinance does not establish numeric maximum acceptable construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified determination of what CEQA constitutes a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase. For this reason, the construction noise thresholds from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment were used to establish a significant construction noise threshold impact if construction noise would exceed 80 dBA at sensitive receptors. As a result, the following mitigation measures focus on ways to further reduce construction noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors so that the impacts would be less than significant:
• MM-NOI-1: Construction staging areas must be located within the western portion of the project site, at least 200 feet east of the project site’s eastern boundary away from the noise sensitive receptors.
● MM-NOI-2: The use of Tier IV rated construction equipment must be used during demolition, site preparation, and construction activities.
• MM-NOI-3: The Applicant must notify local residents regarding construction times and local contact information by placing a notice in the form of a sign alongthe project site’s boundaries in prominent locations. The notice shall include the name and phone number of the contact person at both the construction site and at the City’s Code Enforcement office where residents may call to register a complaint about noise. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractors must stop work to inspect their equipment to ensure that they are properly tuned and muffled. Construction activities may not resume until the contractors confirm that the equipment is properly tuned and muffled. In addition, copies of all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City’s Community Development Director.

SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 75

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
• MM-NOI-4: Construction shall be prohibited from taking place between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday.

These mitigation measures will reduce the Project’s potential construction noise impacts to a level of less than significant. Notably, MM-NOI-3 will ensure a less than significant impact because the Project’s potential construction noise impacts, set forth in Table 3-8 above, are premised on the assumption that the Project will not use Tier 4 machines. Tier 4 machines are quieter than their predecessors, and this is especially true as to the equipment referred to in Table 3-8. For example, Tier 4 equipment of JCB (a company) realized significant noise reductions over its older, non-Tier 4 equipment, from 87 dBA to 72 dBA. The Tier 4 diesel construction equipment utilizes advanced technology that adjusts maximum engine output and MCRs that translated into both improved fuel economy, lower air emissions, and reduced noise and vibration. In general, the Tier 4 requirements took effect in 2015. This Tier 4 requirement will apply to all equipment shown in Table 3-8, including those that could potentially exceed 80 dBA near a sensitive receptor, namely graders and tractors. Overall, the use of this equipment will reduce the Project’s potential construction noise levels by 17%, which will ensure that construction noise resulting from the Project will not exceed the 80 dBA threshold.

Moreover, the Project’s operation will result in a less than significant noise impact. As indicated previously, Beach Boulevard extends along the east side of the project site in a north-south orientation. The noise levels that were captured averaged 66.5 dBAalong the west side ofBeachBoulevard. The noise measurements were recorded with an unobstructed line of sight between the project site and Beach Boulevard. The predominant source of noise in the site’s vicinity is roadway noise generated by passenger vehicles and trucks. Presently, noise levels on-site exceed the City’s 55 dBA exterior threshold. Nevertheless, roadway noise emanating from Beach Boulevard will be reduced by complying with the California Green Building code, which requires the use of energy efficient windows and insulation. Insulationwill be placed between the joists and studs and will serve as an additional buffer which when combined withstucco and drywall, will reduce interior noise levels by a minimum of 10.0 dBA. Noise reductions of up to 20 dBA are possible with closed windows.26 Therefore, roadway noise emanating from Beach Boulevard will be attenuated by an additional 20 dBA, bringing average interior noise levels below the 55 dBA threshold established in the City’s Municipal Code.

A majority of the exterior noise that will be generated from operation of the proposed project will originate from the open (unenclosed) parking areas. Noise generated within the open parking garage would include people shouting/laughing, which averages 64.5 dBA; car door slamming, which averages 62.5 dBA; car idling, which averages 61 dBA;car starting, which averages 59.5 dBA; and people talking, which averages 41 dBA. All of these averages were taken at a distance of 50 feet from the source. This information is based on actual parking lot noise measurements taken by Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Other sources of exterior noise will include noise generated on individual balconies and within the public courtyard areas located in the center and western portions of the project site. Exterior noise produced on balconies and within the public courtyard areas will originate from residents conversing, shouting, laughing, or engaging in any other physical activity. Noise produced by residents on private balconies and within the public courtyard areas will be masked by traffic noise emanating from the adjacent roadways. In addition, noise produced on balconies will be subject to spreading loss. It is important to note that noise originating from the project site is not expected to affect the nearby sensitive receptors. Nevertheless, the project’s operational noise impacts are considered to be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. The proposed project will also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 76

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
replacement with landscaped turf. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no stationary noise impacts are anticipated. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

B. Would the project result in generation of excessive ground borne vibration or groundborne noise levels? ● Less than Significant Impact.

Ground vibrations associated with construction activities using modern construction methods and equipment rarely reach the levels that result in damage to nearby buildings though vibration related to construction activities may be discernible in areas located near the construction site. A possible exception is in older buildings where special care must be taken to avoid structural damage. The U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) has guidelines for vibration levels from construction and recommends that the maximum peak-particle-velocity (PPV) levels remain below 0.05 inches per second at the nearest structures.

PPV refers to the movement within the ground of molecular particles and not surface movement. Vibration levels above 0.5 inches per second have the potential to cause architectural damage to normal dwellings. The U.S. DOT also states that vibration levels above 0.015 inches per second (in/sec) are sometimes perceptible to people, and the level at which vibration becomes an irritation to people is 0.64 inches per second. Caltrans guidance defines the threshold of perception from transient sources as 0.25 inch per second PPV. The project’s implementation would not require excessively deep foundations though construction measures would be implemented under the residential structures to address the liquefaction constraints. The use of these measures will not involve the use of pile drivers or impact producing equipment.

The nearest sensitive receptors (Su Casa Apartments) are located approximately 75 feet to the northeast of the project site. Single family homes are located southeast of the site on the opposite side of the adjacent flood control channel approximately 90 feet. The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of construction equipment, such as a bulldozer. A bulldozer would create a vibration level of 0.058 inch-per-second PPV at 25 feet. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest offsite sensitive receptors, the apartments located more than 75 feet to the northeast of the project site, would be

0.058 inch per second PPV, which would be well below the 0.25 inch per second PPV threshold detailed above (this type of bulldozer would create a vibration level of 0.003 inch-per-second PPV at 25 feet). Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level from a small dozer at a residence located just five feet away from the proposed project site boundary would be 0.03 inch per second PPV, which would be below the 0.25 inch per second PPV threshold. As a result, the impacts will be less than significant.

C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ● No Impact.

The project site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not located within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. The nearest airport is the Long Beach Municipal Airport, located approximately 12 miles west of the project site. As a result, the proposed project will not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels related to airport uses. As a result, no impacts will occur.

3.13.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
SECTION 3.13 ● NOISE PAGE 77

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
As discussed in the previous section, all noise impact will be less than significant. Construction related noise impacts are limited and fall in accordance with the City’s construction- related noise control requirements.

Therefore, cumulative impacts relative to temporary and permanent noise generation associated with the proposed project would not be cumulatively considerable, and thus, less than significant.

3.13.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential noise impacts indicated that the proposed project would result in a potentially significant noise impact absent mitigation. To reduce the Project’s potential noise impacts to a level of less than signfiicant, the project applicant has agreed to the following mitigation measures :
• MM-NOI-1 (Noise Impacts): Construction staging areas must be located within the western portion of the project site, at least 200 feet east of the project site’s eastern boundary away from the noise sensitive receptors.
• MM-NOI-2 (Noise Impacts): The use of Tier IV rated construction equipment must be used during the demolition, site preparation, and construction activities. • MM-NOI-3 (Noise Impacts): The Applicant must notify local residents regarding construction times and local contact information by placing a notice in the form of a sign alongthe project site’s boundaries in prominent locations. The notice shall include the name and phone number of the contact person at both the construction site and at the City’s Code Enforcement office where residents may call to register a complaint about noise. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractors must stop work to inspect their equipment to ensure that it is properly tuned and muffled.

Construction activities may not resume until the contractors confirm that the equipment is properly tuned and muffled. In addition, copies of all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City’s Community Development Director.
• MM-NOI-4 (Noise Impacts): Construction shall be prohibited from taking place between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday.
39 Google Earth. Website Accessed November 20, 2020.

SECTION 3.14 ● POPULATION & HOUSING PAGE 78

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.14 POPULATION & HOUSING
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project induce substantial unplanned
population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?

B. Would the project displace substantial numbers of
existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?


3.14.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? ● No Impact.

According to the Growth Forecast Appendix prepared by SCAG for the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, the City of Stanton is projected to add a total of 2,900 new residents and 1,300 new employees through the year 2040.27 The project’s implementation will not result in an increase in population growth that would exceed the SCAG’s projections. Growth-inducing impacts include the following:
● New development in an area presently undeveloped and economic factors which may influence development. The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site is located within an urbanized area that has been previously developed for its current commercial land use as a recreational vehicle (RV) sales and storage lot. The project site is surrounded on all sides by urban development.
● Extension of roadways and other transportation facilities. No roadway extensions will be required to accommodate the proposed development.
● Extension of infrastructure and other improvements. The installation of any new utility lines will not lead to subsequent offsite development since these utility lines will serve the site only. ● Major off-site public projects (treatment plants, etc.). The project’s increase in demand for utility services can be accommodated without the construction or expansion of landfills, water treatment plants, or wastewater treatment plants.
● The removal of housing requiring replacement housing elsewhere. The site does not contain any housing units. As a result, no replacement housing will be required. 27 Southern California Association of Governments. Growth Forecast. Regional Transportation Plan 2016-2040. Adopted on April 7, 2016.

SECTION 3.14 ● POPULATION & HOUSING PAGE 79

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● Additional population growth leading to increased demand for goods and services. The project’s construction would result in a limited increase in construction employment which can be accommodated by the local labor market.
● Short-term growth-inducing impacts related to the project’s construction. The project will result in temporary employment during the construction phase.

The proposed residential development will not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area.

The approximate 267 new residents that will be a result of the proposed residential development would result in a less than one percent population increase (0.75%) from the 2010 Census population of the City.

These numbers are within the projected population numbers provided by SCAG RTP/SCS forecast for the City.The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette. As a result, no impacts will occur.

B. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ● No Impact.

The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site is located within an urbanized area that has been previously developed for its current commercial land use as a recreational vehicle (RV) sales and storage lot. The majority of the property is paved over with asphalt, with little ruderal vegetation on the premises.

This property and surrounding areas have a General Plan and Zoning designation for General Mixed-Use (GLMX) land uses, which permits the construction of multi-family residential developments. There are currently no housing units within the project site, and no housing units will be displaced as a result of the proposed project’s implementation. Therefore, no impacts will result.

3.14.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The proposed project will not result in direct or indirect, permanent or temporary impacts on population and housing. The proposed project is compliant with the population growth forecast provided by the City.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to population and housing that could be compounded or otherwise increased when considered to other related projects.

3.14.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential population and housing impacts indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 80

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which would cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times, or other performance
objectives for: fire protection; police protection;
schools; parks; or other public facilities?


3.15.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in fire protection; police protection; schools; parks; or other public facilities? ● Less than Significant Impact.

Fire Department
The City of Stanton contracts fire protection services with the Orange County Fire Department from one fire station within the City limits, located at 7871 Pacific Street. The OCFD currently reviews all new development plans. The proposed project will be required to conform to all fire protection and prevention requirements, including, but not limited to, building setbacks, emergency access, and fire flow (or the flow rate of water that is available for extinguishing fires). The proposed residential project would only place an incremental demand on fire services since the project will be constructed with strict adherence to all pertinent building and fire codes. In addition, the proposed project would be required to implement all pertinent Fire Code Standards including the installation of fire hydrants and sprinkler systems inside thebuildings. Furthermore, the project will be reviewed by City and Fire officials to ensure adequate fire service and safety as a result of project implementation. The project will also be required to comply with the City’s Development Impact Fee (DIF) requirements to assist in the funding public facilities and services, including fire. As a result, the potential impacts to fire protection services will be less than significant. The proposed project will also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

Law Enforcement
The City of Stanton contracts with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department for law enforcement services.

The OCSD will review security and site plans to ensure the proposed project conforms to the Department’s SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 81

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
security regulations. The proposed facility will also be required to comply with the OCSD requirements along with the City’s DIF regulations. As a result, the potential impacts to law enforcement services will be less than significant.

Schools
The proposed residential development consisting of 79 residential units is projected to add 267 new residents to the City. The project site is served by the following schools within the Garden Grove Unified School District: Hare High School, Alamitos Intermediate School, and Wakeham Elementary School.

According to the 2010 Census, 25.8 percent of the City’s population is school-aged (five years of age to 18 years of age). Using the Citywide Census data, there is a potential for 69 school-age students to be added to the school system as a result of the project, based on the City’s percentage of children in between the ages of 5 and 18. Pursuant to SB-50, payment of fees to the applicable school district is considered full mitigation for project-related impacts. The proposed project's school enrollment impacts will be offset by the school fees ($3.379 per square foot for residential development) that will be paid by the developer. As a result, less than significant impacts will result from the proposed project’s implementation.

Recreational Services
The nearest public park, Premier Park, is located approximately ½ mile from the project site. Due to the residential nature of the proposed project, the proposed project will place an incremental demand for recreational open space and services. Additionally, Orange County Public Libraries services may experience incremental demand with the closest library being Stanton Library, approximately 1.2 miles north.

However, the potential impacts to park and library services will be offset since the project will involve the installation of an on-site dog park, walking trail, and reading nook. As a result, the impacts anticipated are less than significant. The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

Governmental Services
The proposed project would redevelop the project site with 79 residential units that would also include 8 affordable housing units that improve the City’s housing supply. The site is already served by various governmental services and while the project would result in a limited increase in population, the project would not result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to provide these services. Furthermore, the Applicant is providing various recreational amenities. The proposed project will also include a recreational room equipped with outdoor sitting areas and a double barbeque grilling counter. In addition, the Applicant would be providing a community park and reading nook, a paseo, and a dog park. In addition, the Applicant is required to pay all pertinent development fees that will further offset the cost of the development to the City. Finally, the new development will enhance the assessed valuation of the property which will provide additional long-term property tax revenue to the City. As a result, less than significant impacts will result from the proposed project’s implementation.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 82

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.15.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The proposed project will not result in any significant adverse impacts on public services. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to public services that could be compounded or otherwise increased when considered to other related projects.

3.15.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of public service impacts indicated that less than significant adverse impacts are anticipated, and nomitigation is required with the implementation of the proposed project.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 83

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.16 RECREATION
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?

B. Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?


3.16.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The proposed 3.55-acre (154,470 square-foot) project site has a General Plan and Zoning designation for General Mixed-Use (GLMX) land uses, which permits the construction of multi-family residential developments. The nearest public park, Premier Park, is located approximately 0.7 miles from the project site. Due to the residential nature of the proposed project, the proposed project will place an incremental demand for recreational open space and services. To address the incremental demand of recreational spaces, the proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. Additionally, the proposed project would involve the construction of a recreation room, common activity areas, reading nook, a paseo, and a dog park. As a result, less than significant impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

B. Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ● No Impact.

The proposed project would not result in any improvements that would potentially significantly physically alter any public park facilities and services within the City. The proposed project would include the construction of a recreation room, community park, reading nook, paseo and dog park. Additionally, the proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as the Orangewood Parkette, a passive park consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet. Due to the park’s small size, no impacts will occur.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 84

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.16.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The proposed project will not result in direct or indirect, permanent or temporary impacts on recreational facilities and services. The proposed project is compliant with the population growth forecast provided by the City. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in incremental effects to such facilities and services that could be compounded or otherwise increased when considered to other related projects.

3.16.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential impacts related to parks and recreation indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 85

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.17 TRANSPORTATION
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project conflict with a plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?

B. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
§15064.3 subdivision (b)? 
C. Would the project substantially increase hazards due toa geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 
D. Would the project result in inadequate emergency
access? 

3.17.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The main residential project site is located on the east side of Beach Boulevard between Park Plaza and Catherine Avenue. Beach Boulevard is a north-south Principal Arterial that provides four lanes in each direction separated by raisedmedians and exclusive left-turn lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. On-street parking is prohibited along Beach Boulevard in the project vicinity.28 All traffic counts of AM and PM peak hour turning movements at study intersections were collected on Thursday, February 20, 2020, except intersection No.2 (Beach Boulevard at Park Plaza) which was collected on Thursday, October 15, 2020. Lane configurations and traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown in Exhibit 3-6. Complete traffic data can be found in Appendix B of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).

Level of service (LOS) and V/C ratio for existing conditions are shown in Table 3-9. The analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix C. All study intersections operate at acceptable LOS D or better in the AM and PM peak hours under existing conditions.29
28 KT Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study and Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Screening. Report dated November 2020. 29 Ibid.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 86

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
PM Peak Hours
EXHIBIT 3-6

EXISTING CIRCULATION SYSTEM
SOURCE: K2TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
AM Peak Hours
SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 87

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Table 3-9
Existing Conditions
Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

LOS ICU/
Delay(s) LOS ICU/Delay(s)

1. Beach Blvd at Chapman Ave C 0.791 D 0.845

2. Beach Blvd at Park Plaza* D 26.2 D 27.7

3. Beach Blvd at Catherine Ave* C 22.4 D 30.8

4. Beach Blvd at Lampson Ave C 0.801 C 0.877
*Stop controlled at minor approach with delay shown in seconds Trip generation represents the amount of traffic attracted and produced by the project development.

Based upon the recommendations from Trip Generation, Tenth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), applicable trip generation rates are shown in Table 3-10.30 Table 3-10
Project Trip Generation
Land Use Unit Quantity
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily
Total In Out Total In Out
Proposed Use
Multifamily Housing
(Mid-Rise) (221)
Dwelling
Unit
79 39 9 30 48 30 18 622
Existing-Use Credit
Recreational Vehicle Sales
(842)
1000
Sq. Ft.
-6.52 -3 -3 0 -5 -2 -3 -33
NET Trip Generation 36 6 30 43 28 15 589
Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the proposed project.

Directional orientation is largely influenced by the geographical location of the site, among many other factors. The trip distribution pattern for the project is illustrated on Exhibit 3-7.

The traffic assignment to and from the site has been based upon the results of trip generation, trip distribution, and access layouts. Exhibit 3-8 illustrates the traffic assignment of the proposedproject in the AM and PM peak hour.
30 KT Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study and Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Screening. Report dated June 30, 2021.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 88

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 3-7

TRIP DISTRIBUTION
SOURCE: K2TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 89

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT 3-8

TRIP ASSIGNMENT
SOURCE: K2TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PM Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour
SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 90

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
The level of service and V/C ratios are shown in Table 3-11. All study intersections will operate at LOS D or better for the AM and PM peak hours in this scenario.

Table 3-11
Existing Conditions with Project
Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

LOS ICU/
Delay(s) LOS ICU/Delay(s)

1. Beach Blvd at Chapman Ave C 0.793 D 0.847

2. Beach Blvd at Park Plaza* D 26.2 D 27.9

3. Beach Blvd at Catherine Ave* C 22.4 D 31.0

4. Beach Blvd at Lampson Ave C 0.803 D 0.879

5. Beach Blvd. @ Project Drivwy C 22.6 D 30.2
*Stop controlled at minor approach with delay shown in seconds The traffic impacts of the proposed project based on existing conditions are shown in Table 3-12.

Table 3-12
Project Intersection Impact Analysis Existing Conditions with Project Intersection
W/O Project W/Project
Increase Significant
Impact LOS ICU/
Delay(s) LOS ICU/Delay(s)
AM Peak Hour

1. Beach Blvd at Chapman Ave C 0.791 C 0.793 0.001 No

2. Beach Blvd at Park Plaza* D 26.2 D 26.2 0 No

3. Beach Blvd at Catherine Ave* C 22.4 C 22.4 0 No

4. Beach Blvd at Lampson Ave C 0.801 C 0.803 0.002 No

5. Beach Blvd. @ Driveway -- -- C 22.6 -- No
PM Peak Hour

1. Beach Blvd at Chapman Ave D 0.845 D 0.847 0.001 No

2. Beach Blvd at Park Plaza* D 27.7 D 27.9 0.2 sec No

3. Beach Blvd at Catherine Ave* D 30.8 D 31.0 0.2 sec No

4. Beach Blvd at Lampson Ave C 0.877 C 0.879 0.002 No

5. Beach Blvd. @ Driveway -- --- D 30.2 -- --
*Stop controlled at minor approach with delay shown in seconds SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 91

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
According to the City of Stanton’s standard, a significant impact occurs at a study intersection when the peak hour LOS falls below D, and the intersection capacity utilization (ICU) increases by 0.03 or more. The City of Stanton is required to demonstrate compliance with 2019 Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Congestion Management Plan (CMP) as Beach Boulevard is designated as Orange County CMP facility, the traffic impact is deemed significant and mitigation is required if both of the following conditions are met: 1. The intersection operates at worse than LOS E, and 2. The ICU increases by 0.10 or more. The project does not have a significant traffic impact and mitigation measures are not required.

The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

B. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision (b)? ● Less than Significant Impact.

According to the “Los Angeles County Public Works Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines”, projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) as determined by the most recent Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) should be exempt from VMT analysis. TPA is within one-half mile from major transit stops.

Major transit stop is defined as a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. It also includes major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional transportation.

The draft Transit Priority Area (TPA) in the SCAG Region for the 2045 plan, updated on June 2019, has illustrated that the project site is within one-half mile from the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Chapman Avenue, a major transit stop defined as an intersection of two major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commuteperiods. Relevant bus schedules can be found in Appendix B of the traffic study. The project located within TPA is presumed to have less than significant VMT impact. For projects that are in TPA, a secondary screening is required to verify the proposed project’s consistencywith the assumptions from the RTP/SCS. The proposed project is a high-density residential development, consistent with the proposed land uses in the RTP/SCS.

The project is located within the Transit Priority Area (TPA) and presumed to have less than significant VMT impact. The project is a high-density residential development, consistent with the proposed land uses in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Initial and secondary screening show that project has no or less than significant VMT impacts. The proposed project is not applicable to the following secondary screening requirements: is consistent with RTP/SCS, has a floor-toarea ratio (FAR) less than 0.75, does not provide an excessive amount of parking, and reduces the number of affordable housing units. The project would therefore have a less than significant impact, and mitigation measure is therefore not required for the project.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 92

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
C. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The proposed project includes the proper design and implementation of ingress and egress traffic openings.

To reduce possible hazards, the traffic entrances will be electrically operated gates which will be in compliance with OCFA guidelines, well lit, properly designated, and have enhanced paving. As a result, less than significant impacts will result.

D. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? ● No Impact.

The proposed project would not affect emergency access to any adjacent parcels. The proposed project site provides emergency access at the north end of the project site along Beach Boulevard. In addition, at no time during construction will adjacent streets be completely closed to traffic. All construction staging must occur on- site. As a result, no impacts are associated with the proposed project’s implementation.

3.17.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
As indicated previously, the proposed project is a high-density residential development, consistent with the proposed land uses in the RTP/SCS. The project is located within the Transit Priority Area (TPA) and presumed to have less than significant VMT impact. The project is a high density residential development, consistent with the proposed land uses in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Initial and secondary screening show that project has no or less than significant VMT impact. Mitigation measure is, therefore, not required for the project. Initial and secondary screening show that project has no or less than significant VMT impact.

Based on the information provided by the Planning Department of the City of Stanton, the following cumulative developments are taken into consideration for analysis of the opening yearconditions:
● Village Center and Village Center North: The development of Village Center includes 208 multifamily dwelling units in total and 105,000 square feet of commercial retail; There are 94 family dwelling units in Village Center and114 multi-family dwelling units in Village Center North. ● VRV Mixed-Use: The mixed-use development includes 300 apartment units, and 6,200 square feet of retail uses.
● Cloud House Apartment: The development of 321 apartment units includes 41 studios, 196 onebedroom, and 84 two-bedroom units.

For project opening year 2023, the annual growth rate of two percent (2%) is used. This factor represents traffic increases resulting from regional growth. The project’s level of service under opening year with cumulative developments conditions are shown in Table 3-13. All study intersections operate at acceptable LOS E or better in the AM and PM peak hours except the following: Intersection #3, Beach Boulevard at Catherine Avenue: LOS E in the PM peak hours and Intersection #4, Beach Boulevard at Lampson Avenue:

LOS E in the PM peak hours.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 93

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
Table 3-13
Cumulative Traffic Conditions
Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

LOS ICU/
Delay(s) LOS ICU/Delay(s)

1. Beach Blvd at Chapman Ave D 0.833 D 0.899

2. Beach Blvd at Park Plaza* D 28.5 D 31.8

3. Beach Blvd at Catherine Ave* D 26.0 E 35.6

4. Beach Blvd at Lampson Ave D 0.849 E 0.949
*Stop controlled at minor approach with delay shown in seconds

3.17.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of potential impacts related to traffic and circulation indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 91

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?

B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is or a resource
determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1 In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe?


3.18.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? ● Less than Significant Impact.

A Tribal Resource is defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 and includes the following:
● Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. ● A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 92

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
● A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. ● A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a “non-unique archaeological resource” as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms to the criteria of subdivision (a).

There are no documented historic resources on or within the vicinity of the project site. The project site is not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources.

The proposed project would not result in an impact to a tribal cultural resource.

B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is: a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1 In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe5020.1(k)? ● Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation.

The proposed project’s construction would involve excavation as part of development of the proposed building foundations. The project grading is anticipated to remain within the fill material but has the potential to encroach into native soils that have not been previously disturbed. Assembly Bill 52 Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 (Assembly Bill [AB] 52), requires that Lead Agencies evaluate a project’s potential to impact “tribal cultural resources.” Such resources include “sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources.” AB 52 also gives lead agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource qualifies as a “tribal cultural resource.” Also, per AB 52 (specifically PRC 21080.3.1), Native American consultation is required upon request by a California Native American tribe that has previously requested that the City provide it with notice of such projects. A search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) was requested for the project by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC responded stating that there are no known/known sacred lands within 0.5 mile of the project site.

These tribes include the following: Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe, Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, Gabrielino Tongva – San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrielino Tongva – San Gabriel California Tribal Council, and Gabrielino/Tongva Nation. On April 16, 2021, the City received an e-mailed response to the City’s AB 52 outreach letters, which was from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians stating that the subject site is within their Ancestral Tribal Territory and thus had requested that a consultation be scheduled to go over the project and surrounding location in further detail. The tribe Chairman, Andy Salas, provided modifications to the previous mitigation measure that was used for another project within the City for its use for the proposed project. The measure has been included as Mitigation Measure TCR-1 that provides tribal monitoring of initial site clearing (such as pavement removal) and ground disturbing activities. Also, as described previously, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 has been included to provide procedures to be followed in the event that potential resources are discovered during grading, excavation, or construction activities. As detailed previously, if the discovered resource(s) appears Native American in origin, a Native American Monitor shall be contacted to evaluate any potential tribal cultural resource(s) and shall have the opportunity to consult on appropriate SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 93

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
treatment and curation of these resources. Additionally, as described previously (and included as PPP CUL-1), California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered in the project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Thus, impacts related to California Native American tribe resources would be less than significant with the implementation of the following mitigation measures:
● MM-TCR-1. The project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community Development Director. The monitor will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
● MM-TCR-2. All archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The preferred treatment will be reburial or preservation in place.
● MM-TCR-3. If any human skeletal material or related funerary objects are discovered during ground disturbance, the Monitor will immediately divert work at minimum of 50 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The Monitor will then notify the construction manager who will call the coroner.

Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the remains are Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. The preferred treatment will be to keep the remains in situ and protected. If that treatment is not feasible, as determined by the applicant, the burials may be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all material. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 94

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.18.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACT
The potential cumulative impacts on tribal/cultural resources are typically site specific. Furthermore, the analysis determined that the proposed project would be required to employ mitigation to address any resources that may be encountered during excavation. As a result, no cumulative impacts on tribal cultural resources are anticipated.

3.18.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
Adherence to the mitigation measures presented in Subsection B under Cultural Resources will minimize potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. Nevertheless, the following mitigation measures have been provided to ensure the project’s impacts are less than significant.

MM-TCR-1 (Tribal Cultural Resources). The project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor during construction-related ground disturbance activities.

Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community Development Director. The monitor will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

MM-TCR-2 (Tribal Cultural Resources). All archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The preferred treatment will be reburial or preservation in place.

MM-TCR-3 (Tribal Cultural Resources). If any human skeletal material or related funerary objects are discovered during ground disturbance, the Monitor will immediately divert work at minimum of 50 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The Monitor will then notify the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the remains are Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. The preferred treatment will be to keep the remains in situ and protected. If that treatment is not feasible, as determined by the applicant, the burials may be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully.

If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. //Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all material. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 95

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.19 UTILITIES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater
treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?

B. Would the project have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?

C. Would the project result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?

D. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of
State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?

E. Would the project comply with Federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?


3.19.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? ● Less than Significant Impact.

The project’s implementation will not require the relocation of any utilities. The current infrastructure in place can support the needs of the proposed project. The City of Stanton’s current providers for this specific project location are: Golden State Water for water, Southern California Edison for electricity, Southern California Gas for natural gas, and Frontier Communications for telecommunication services.

Golden State Water Company has been serving Los Alamitos and West Orange County since 1929. They currently serve approximately 27,200 customers, including Stanton residents. Water supplies are provided by water pumped from the Orange County Groundwater Basin and imported water from the Colorado River that is distributed by Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. GSWC owns and operates 11,850 gallons of water per minute. The proposed project would be posing a limited incremental demand on local water systems. In addition, the increase in demand for waste disposal, water, and wastewater treatment services can be adequately handled and no expansion of these services is required.

As a result, the potential impacts will be less than significant. The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 96

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. No wastewater connections will be required though water connections will be required for irrigation. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

B. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? ● Less than Significant Impact.

Water service to the project site is provided by the Golden State Water Company (GSWC), a private water purveyor. GSWC owns and operates the system, which serves cities within west Orange County. In order to meet demand, GSWC supplies its customers with imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and groundwater from the Orange County basin. GSWC does not currently operate a separate recycled water distribution system within the area. According to the General Plan EIR, the existing water supply for the City is sufficient to meet projected water demands associated with the General Plan buildout, assuming source and supply capacities remain consistent with current conditions. Exacerbated drought conditions, climate conditions or impacts to regional water conveyance infrastructure could quickly change these conclusions. GSWC facilities currently serving the West Orange County System, including the City of Stanton, are adequate to meet anticipated service demands. As indicated in Table 3-14, the proposed project is anticipated to consume 30,810 gallons of water on a daily basis while GSWC, owns and operate 11,850 gallons of water per minute.

Table 3-14
Water Consumption (gals/day)
Use Unit Factor Generation
Single-family Home 79 units 390 gals/dwelling unit 30,810 gals/day Total 79 units 30,810 gals/day
Source: California Home Building Foundation
The existing water supply facilities and infrastructure will accommodate this additional demand. In addition, the proposed project will be equipped with water efficient fixtures and drought tolerant landscaping will be planted throughout the project site. As a result, the impacts are considered to be less than significant. The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The project would involve the removal of the existing hardscape surfaces and their replacement with landscaped turf. No wastewater connections will be required though water connections will be required for irrigation. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 97

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
C. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? ● Less than Significant Impact.

Wastewater is collected by the City of Stanton Public Works Department’s Sewer Maintenance Division and then is treated by the Orange County Sanitation Districts (OCSD). The City of Cypress transfers wastewater to the treatment plants located in Fountain Valley (Plant #1) and Huntington Beach (Plant #2). The City of Stanton Public Works Department and the OCSD indicate that presently no deficiencies exist within their facilities serving the City. According to the City of Stanton Public Works Department, the local sanitary sewer system has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development. According to Table 3-15, the proposed project is expected to generate approximately 19,355 gallons of sewage per day. As a result, the impacts are expected to be less than significant.

Table 3-15
Wastewater (Effluent) Generation (gals/day)
Use Unit Factor Generation
Single Family Residential 79 units 245 gallons/unit/day 19,355 gals/day Total 79 units 19,355 gals/day
Source: California Home Building Foundation
D. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? ● Less than Significant Impact.

Solid waste collection services in Stanton are contracted with CR&R, Incorporated, which operates Stanton Disposal Services. In 2017, the City disposed over 97 percent of its solid waste at the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in the City of Irvine.1 The Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill has a maximum permitted throughput of 11,500 tons per day, remaining capacity of 205,000,000 cubic yards, and anticipated closure date of 2053. The proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 966 pounds per day of solid waste (refer to Table 3-16 shown on the following page). As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant.

Table 3-16
Solid Waste Generation (lbs./day)
Use Unit Factor Generation
Single Family Residential 79 units 12 lbs./day 966 lbs./day Total 79 units 966 lbs./day
Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.

The proposed project would also involve the construction of a new, off-site parkette referred to as Orangewood Parkette, consisting of approximately 7,600 square feet located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The new parkette will be a passive park and because of its small size, no significant impacts are anticipated. As a result, no solid waste generation impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed parkette.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 98

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
E. Would the project comply with Federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ● No Impact.

The proposed project, like all other development in Orange County and the City of Stanton, will be required to adhere to City and County ordinances with respect to waste reduction and recycling. The proposed project will be in compliance with the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, specifically California statute AB 939 and AB1327 of the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991. These statutes were created to help cities divert 50% of solid waste yearly and ensure that local agencies only issue a building permit to projects that provide adequate arears for collecting and loading recyclable materials. As aresult, no impacts related to State and local statutes governing solid waste are anticipated.

3.19.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACT
The Golden State Water Company (GSWC) provides service to more than 1 million people in over 80 communities, including the City of Stanton. According to the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, the City is projected to have enough water to meet the increase in demand. In addition, the City is projected to have enough water to meet demand during a single dry year, and a multiple dry year scenario. The project at total build-out will consume 30,810 gallons of water per day and generate 19.355 gallons of effluent per day. The potential cumulative impacts on utilities indicated that no significant impacts would result from the proposed project’s approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation is required.

3.19.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of utilities impacts indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation is required.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 99

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.20 WILDFIRE
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

B. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

C. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?

D. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?


3.20.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ● No Impact.

According to the Cal FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Database, the residential project site and the proposed parkette site are not located within a severe fire hazard zone. Furthermore, the proposed project would not involve the closure or alteration of any existing evacuation routes that would be important in the event of a wildfire. As a result, no impacts will occur.

B. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? ● No Impact.

The proposed project may be exposed to particulate emissions generated by wildland fires in the surrounding region. However, the potential impacts would not be exclusive to the project site since criteria pollutant emissions from wildland fires may affect the entire City as well as the surrounding cities and unincorporated county areas. As a result, no impacts will occur.

SECTION 3.15 ● PUBLIC SERVICES PAGE 100

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
C. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? ● No Impact.

The project site is not located in an area that is classified as a high fire risk severity, and therefore will not require the installation of specialized infrastructure such as fire roads, fuel breaks, or emergency water sources. As a result, no impacts will occur.

D. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ● No Impact.

There is no risk from wildfire within the project site or the surrounding area given the project site’s distance from any area that may be subject to a wildfire event. Therefore, the project will not result in any impacts related to flooding or landslides facilitated by runoff flowing down barren and charred slopes given the area’s level topography and developed character and no impacts will occur.

3.20.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Impacts related to wildfire are typically site specific. The analysis determined that the proposed project would not result in any impacts relative to potential wildfire risk. As a result, no cumulative wildfire impacts are anticipated to result from the proposed project’s implementation.

3.20.3 MITIGATION MEASURES
The analysis of wildfires impacts indicated that less than significant impacts would result from the proposed project's approval and subsequent implementation. As a result, no mitigation is required.

PAGE 101

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
With
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
A. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?

B. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? 
C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?

The following findings can be made regarding the Mandatory Findings of Significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the results of this environmental assessment:

A. The proposed project will not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. As indicated in Section 3, the proposed project will have less than significant impact for the majority of the environmental issues though mitigation will be required for the proposed project’s potential impacts on biological and cultural resources.

B. The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. The proposed project is relatively small, and the attendant environmental impacts will not lead to a cumulatively significant impact on any of the issues analyzed herein. As indicated in Section 3, the proposed project will have less than significant impact for the majority of the environmental issues though mitigation will be required for the proposed project’s potential impacts on biological and cultural resources.

C. The proposed project will not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. As indicated in Section 3, the proposed project will have less than significant impact.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

SECTION 4 CONCLUSIONS

4.1FINDINGS
Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code states that findings must be adopted by the decision-makers coincidental to the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. These findings shall be incorporated as part of the decision-maker’s findings of fact, in response to AB-3180. In accordance with the requirements of Section 21081(a) and 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code, the following additional findings may be made:
● A mitigation reporting or monitoring program will be required; ● Site plans and/or building plans, submitted for approval by the responsible monitoring agency, shall include the required standard conditions; and,
● An accountable enforcement agency or monitoring agency shall be identified for the mitigations adopted as part of the decision-maker’s final determination.

4.2 MITIGATION MONITORING
The following mitigation will be provided to reduce potential impacts to nesting and migratory species:

MM-BIO-1 (Biological Resources Impacts). If clearing and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before the construction activities commence. A copy of the report must be provided to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to the start of any work on the project site. The qualified biologist shall survey the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season. If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall establish a 100-foot no-activity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250-foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance should occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist. The biologist must be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any type of permit being issued for the project.

The following mitigation is required to ensure that a tribal representative is present during constructionrelated ground-disturbingactivities:

MM-CUL-1 (Cultural Resources Impacts). The project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community Development Director and will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

ground disturbing activities. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

The following mitigation measures will be required to further reduce construction noise levels so that the impacts would be less than significant:

MM-NOI-1 (Noise Impacts): Construction staging areas must be located within the western portion of the project site, at least 200 feet east of the project site’s eastern boundary away from the noise sensitive receptors.

MM-NOI-2 (Noise Impacts): MM-NOI-2 (Noise Impacts): The use of Tier IV rated construction equipment must be used during demolition, site preparation, and construction activities.

MM-NOI-3 (Noise Impacts): The Applicant must notify local residents regarding construction times and local contact information by placing a notice in the form of a sign alongthe project site’s boundaries in prominent locations. The notice shall include the name and phone number of the contact person at both the construction site and at the City’s Code Enforcement office where residents may call to register a complaint about noise. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractors must stop work to inspect their equipment to ensure that they are properly tuned and muffled. Construction activities may not resume until the contractors confirm that the equipment is properly tuned and muffled. In addition, copies of all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City’s Community Development Director.

MM-NOI-4 (Noise Impacts): The use of jackhammers or hoe rams (breakers) to demolishthe existing pavement shall be prohibited from taking place between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday.

The analysis determined that the proposed project will require the following mitigation in order to minimize potential impacts to tribal cultural resources:

MM-TCR-1 (Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts). The project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities thatinclude, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community Development Director. The monitor will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. Theon-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed,or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

MM-TCR-2 (Tribal Cultural Resources). All archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The preferred treatment will be reburial or preservation in place.

MM-TCR-3 (Tribal Cultural Resources). If any human skeletal material or related funerary objects are discovered during ground disturbance, the Monitor will immediately divert work at minimum of 50 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The Monitor will then notify the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the remains are Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. The preferred treatment will be to keep the remains in situ and protected. If that treatment is not feasible, as determined by the applicant, the burials may be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all material. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC.

The monitoring and reporting on the implementation of these measures, including the period for implementation, monitoring agency, and the monitoring action, are identified in Table 7.1 provided on the following pages.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE 7.1

MITIGATION-MONITORING PROGRAM
Measure Enforcement
Agency
Monitoring
Phase Verification
MM-BIO-1 (Biological Resources Impacts). If clearing
and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before the construction activities commence. A copy of the report must be provided to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to the start of any work on the project site. The qualified biologist shall survey the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season. If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall establish a 100- foot no-activity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250-foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance should occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist. The biologist must be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any type of permit being issued for the project.

Director of
Community
Development
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
Prior to the
issuance of
building
permits.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

MM-CUL-1 (Cultural Resources Impacts). The project
Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community Development Director and will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

MM-NOI-1 (Noise Impacts): Construction staging areas must be located within the western portion of the project site, at least 200 feet east of the project site’s eastern boundary away from the noise sensitive receptors.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE 7.1

MITIGATION-MONITORING PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Measure Enforcement
Agency
Monitoring
Phase
Verification
MM-NOI-2 (Noise Impacts): The use of Tier IV rated
construction equipment must be used during demolition, site preparation, and construction activities.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

MM-NOI-3 (Noise Impacts): The Applicant must notify local residents regarding construction times and local contact information by placing a notice in the form of a sign alongthe project site’s boundaries in prominent locations. The notice shall include the name and phone number of the contact person at both the construction site and at the City’s Code Enforcement office where residents may call to register a complaint about noise. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractors must stop work to inspect their equipment to ensure that they are properly tuned and muffled. Construction activities may not resume until the contractors confirm that the equipment is properly tuned and muffled. In addition, copies of all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City’s Community Development
Director.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

MM-NOI-4 (Noise Impacts): The use of jackhammers or hoe rams (breakers) to demolishthe existing pavement shall be prohibited from taking place between the hours of eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE 7.1

MITIGATION-MONITORING PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Measure Enforcement
Agency
Monitoring
Phase Verification
MM-TCR-1 (Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts). The
project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified NativeAmerican Monitorduring construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined by the Tribal Representatives from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians, Kizh Nation as activities thatinclude, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor must be approved by the tribal representatives and the City’s Community
Development Director. The monitor will be present on-site during the grading and construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. Theon-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed,or when the monitor has indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. Documentation that the required monitoring has been completed shall be provided to the Chief Building Official prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

MM-TCR-2 (Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts). All
archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The preferred treatment will be reburial or preservation in place.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

MM-TCR-3 (Tribal Cultural Resources) If any human skeletal material or related funerary objects are discovered during ground disturbance, the Monitor will immediately divert work at minimum of 50 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The Monitor will then notify the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the remains are Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. The preferred treatment will be to keep the remains in situ and protected. If that treatment is not feasible, as determined by the applicant, the burials may be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all material.

Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC.

Community
Development
Director and the
Chief Building
Official
●
(Applicant is
responsible for
implementation)
During the
project’s grading
and construction
phases.
●
Mitigation ends
when
construction is
completed.

Date:

Name & Title:

APPENDIX A ● AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS Page 109

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

5.1 PREPARERS
SECTION 5 REFERENCES
Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning
16388 Colima Road, Suite 206J
Hacienda Heights, CA 92240
(626) 336-0033
Marc Blodgett, Project Principal
Andrea Withers, Project Manager
Karla Nayakarathne GIS Geographer Technician

5.2 REFERENCES
Bugliarello, et. al., The Impact of Noise Pollution, Chapter 127, 1976.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Farmland Mapping, and Monitoring Program. California Important Farmland Finder.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Diversity Database.

California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Historical Landmarks.

California Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazards Mapping Program, 2012.

California Office of Planning and Research, California Environmental Quality Act and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended 2018.

Google Earth.

Stanton, City of, Municipal Code, Chapter 17.70, Signs.

Southern California Association of Governments, Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy 2016-2040, April 2016.

KT Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study and Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Screening. Report dated November 2020.

United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey.

APPENDIX A ● AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS Page 110

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 111

APPENDIX
APPENDIX A – AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX B – NOISE MEASUREMENTS WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX C – TRAFFIC STUDY

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 112
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 113
APPENDIX A – AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 114

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 115

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 116

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 117

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 118

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 119

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 120

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 121

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 122

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 123

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 124

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 125

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 126

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 127

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 128

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 129

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 130

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 131

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 132

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 133

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 134

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 135

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 136

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 137

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 138

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 139

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 140
APPENDIX B – NOISE MEASUREMENTS

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 141

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 142

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 143
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 144
APPENDIX C – TRAFFIC STUDY

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 145
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 146

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 147

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 148

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 149

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 150

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 151

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 152

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 153

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 154

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 155

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 156

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 157

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 158

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 159

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 160

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 161

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 162

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 163

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 164

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 165

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 166

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 167

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 168

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 169

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 170

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 171

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 172

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 173

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 174

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 175

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 176

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 177

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 178

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 179

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 180

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 181

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 182

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 183

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 184

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 185

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 186

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 187

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 188

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 189

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 190

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 191

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 192

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 193

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 194

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 195

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 196

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 197

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 198

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 199

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 200

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 201

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 202

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 203

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 204

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 205

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 206

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 207

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 208

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 209

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 210

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 211

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 212

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 213

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 214

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 215

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 216

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 217

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 218

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 219

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 220

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 221

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 222

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 223

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 224

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 225

INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STANTON TOWNHOMES ● 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
APPENDICES ● PAGE 226
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” STATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 12
൬൲൰൫ EAST ൯TH STREET, SUITE ൬൫൫
SANTA ANA, CA ൴൭൲൫൰
PHONE (൱൰൲) ൮൭൳-൱൫൫൫
FAX (൱൰൲) ൮൭൳-൱൰൭൭
TTY ൲൬൬
www.dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district12
Making Conservation
a California Way of Life.

November 18, 2021
Ms. Estefany Franco
City of Stanton
Community and Economic Development
Department, Planning Division
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
File: IGR/CEQA
SCH#: 2021110029
IGR LOG #2021-01824
SR-22 & SR-39
Dear Ms. Franco,
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the review of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Bigsby Townhomes and Orangewood Parkette project. The Applicant (Bonanni Development) proposes to construct a 79-unit townhome residential development on an approximately 3.54-acre site at 12200 Beach Boulevard Assessor Parcel Number 131-422-20, within the Commercial General (C-G) zone with a General Mixed-Use Overlay (GLMX). The proposed project also includes an off-site pocket park (Orangewood Parkette) of approximately 7,600 square feet at the terminus of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street. The proposed project will require approval of (1) Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR)- 811, (2) Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 20-04 for a stand-alone residential project in the Mixed-Use zone; (3) Planned Development Permit (PDP) 20-07 for projects between 51-500 units; (4) Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 20-06 for the subdivision of land for condominium purposes; and (5) Development Agreement (DA) 20-04 for projects requiring a Planned Development Permit. The project site is located on 12200 Beach Boulevard and the Orangewood Parkette at the terminus of Orangewood Avenue and Santa Rosalia Street and the nearest state facilities are SR-22 and SR-39.

The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe, sustainable, integrated, and efficient transportation system to enhance California’s economy and livability. Caltrans is a responsible agency and has the following comments:

Click here to return to the agenda
Ms. Estefany Franco
November 18, 2021