Cities Index.
Agenda

Stanton City Council
January 11, 2022

Document
Agenda
Meeting
January 11, 2022
Body
Stanton City Council
Pages
108
Original file
78.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.stantonca.gov. That file is the official record.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 1 of 13 ends

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

JOINT REGULAR MEETING
STANTON CITY HALL, 7800 KATELLA AVENUE, STANTON, CA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2022 - 6:30 P.M.

SAFETY ALERT – NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 890-4245. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

The President, Governor, and the City of Stanton have declared a State of Emergency as a result of the threat of COVID-19 (aka the “Coronavirus”). On September 16, 2021, Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361) was signed by Governor Newsom to allow for the City Council to attend City Council meetings electronically/telephonically and for the public to participate in the City Council meeting by electronic means. Given the health risks associated with COVID-19 and the recent surge of the Omicron variant, state and local officials are recommending measures to promote social distancing. To that end, the Stanton City Council will return to virtual meetings until further notice. The health and well-being of our residents and staff is the top priority for the City of Stanton, and people are urged to take all appropriate health safety precautions.

Members of the public will be able to access the meeting live electronically/telephonically using any of the following sources.

In order to join the meeting via telephone please follow the steps below:

1. Dial the following phone number +1 (669) 900-9128 US (San Jose).

2. Dial in the following Meeting ID: (856 5809 9322) to be connected to the meeting.

In order to join the meeting via electronic device please utilize the URL link below:
• https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85658099322?pwd=eHVzWHd4ZjZySHhmT1RBK1BYbEN2QT09

ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY DO SO AS FOLLOWS:

E-Mail your comments to [email protected] with the subject line “PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #” (insert the item number relevant to your comment). Comments received no later than 5:00 p.m. before the meeting (Tuesday, January 11, 2022) will be compiled, provided to the City Council, and made available to the public before the start of the meeting. Staff will not read e-mailed comments at the meeting. However, the official record will include all e-mailed comments received until the close of the meeting.

The Stanton City Council and staff thank you for your continued patience and cooperation during these unprecedented times. Should you have any questions related to participation in the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 890-4245.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 2 of 13 ends

The City Council agenda and supporting documentation is made available for public review and inspection during normal business hours in the Office of the City Clerk, 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton California 90680 immediately following distribution of the agenda packet to a majority of the City Council. Packet delivery typically takes place on Thursday afternoons prior to the regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday. The agenda packet is also available for review and inspection on the city’s website at www.ci.stanton.ca.us.

1. CLOSED SESSION (6:00 PM)

2. ROLL CALL Council / Agency / Authority Member Taylor Council / Agency / Authority Member Van
Council / Agency / Authority Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem / Vice Chairman Ramirez
Mayor / Chairman Shawver

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Closed Session may convene to consider matters of purchase / sale of real property (G.C. §54956.8), pending litigation (G.C. §54956.9(a)), potential litigation (G.C. §54956.9(b)) or personnel items (G.C. §54957.6). Records not available for public inspection.

4. CLOSED SESSION
4A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d) (2)
Number of Potential Cases: 2
4B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8)
Property: 10692 Beach Boulevard, CA (APN 126-434-12)
Negotiating Parties: Jarad L. Hildenbrand, City Manager, City of Stanton Hyuncho Park, Owner
Under Negotiation: Instruction to negotiator will concern price and terms of payment.

5. CALL TO ORDER STANTON CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY JOINT REGULAR MEETING (6:30 PM)
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 3 of 13 ends

6. ROLL CALL Council / Agency / Authority Member Taylor Council / Agency / Authority Member Van
Council / Agency / Authority Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem / Vice Chairman Ramirez
Mayor / Chairman Shawver

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

8. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS None.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar may be acted on simultaneously, unless a Council/Board Member requests separate discussion and/or action.

CONSENT CALENDAR
9A. MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON THE

PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER READING WAIVED
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council/Agency Board/Authority Board waive reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.
9B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
City Council approve demand warrants dated December 3, 2021 – December 30, 2021, in the amount of $3,963,336.50.
9C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1. City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority approve Minutes of Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021; and

2. City Council approve Minutes of Special Meeting – December 16, 2021.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 4 of 13 ends

9D. NOVEMBER 2021 INVESTMENT REPORT
The Investment Report as of November 30, 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of November 2021. 9E. OCTOBER 2021 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY)
The Investment Report as of October 31, 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Successor Agency find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of October 2021. 9F. NOVEMBER 2021 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT AND

STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended November 30, 2021, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

2.20.080 (D) and is being provided to City Council. This report includes information for both the City’s General Fund and the Housing Authority Fund. In addition, staff has provided a status of the City’s Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) as of November 30, 2021.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 5 of 13 ends

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund’s November 2021 Revenue and Expenditure Report and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended November 30, 2021.
9G. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA APPROVING SUBDIVISION TRACT MAP NO. 18107
The subdivision tract map for the development of seventeen (17) three-story attached condominium units for the property located at 11752 Beach Blvd has been submitted by the developer for final certification and recordation.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declares this project categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 32, and Section 15332; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-03 approving final Tract Map No. 18107, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUBDIVISION TRACT MAP NO. 18107 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11752 BEACH BOULEVARD”; and

3. Find that the recordation of Tract Map No. 18107 will not be in violation of any of the provisions of Section 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.2 of the Subdivision Map Act; and

4. Find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; and

5. Direct the City Engineer to review and approve any further technical edits necessary to allow for County Surveyor approval and for recordation of the map with the County Recorder of Orange County, and if edits are necessary, to require a revised Tract Map with a revised City Engineer’s certificate on the face of Tract Map for endorsement by the current City Engineer; and

6. Direct the City Engineer to collect any security instruments required by the Stanton Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act to guarantee construction of private and public improvements prior to the City Clerk endorsing the City Clerk’s certificate on the face of the Tract Map; and

7. Direct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of the Tract Map, the certificate which embodies the approval of said map, and submit the map to the County Recorder of Orange County for recording.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 6 of 13 ends

9H. MEETING DATES FOR THE STANTON CITY COUNCIL, STANTON PARKS,

RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION, STANTON PLANNING

COMMISSION, AND STANTON PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
City Council review the attached 2022 meeting dates for the Stanton City Council, Stanton Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission, Stanton Planning Commission, and Stanton Public Safety Committee.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Stanton City Council, Stanton Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission, Stanton Planning Commission, and Stanton Public Safety Committee meeting dates for the year 2022. 9I. AWARD OF CONTRACT TO NV5 TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING

SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN UPDATED SEWER MASTER PLAN A Sewer Master Plan assesses the needs of the City’s sewer system and plans and prioritizes maintenance and rehabilitation of the system with available funding. An updated sewer master plan is not only a requirement of the City’s Waste Discharge Permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board but is also a useful planning tool for the City’s Capital Improvement Plan. Preparation of the updated Sewer Master Plan will require the services of a highly specialized consulting firm. The previous Sewer Master Plan update was prepared in 2014 by AKM Consulting Engineers. City staff released a “Request for Proposal” (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide an updated Sewer Master Plan to reflect the current condition of the sewer system, to assess the capacity of the existing system to handle flows generated at the ultimate “build-out” of the City, and to develop a comprehensive 10-year Capital Improvement Program with recommended projects. One firm provided a proposal: NV5.

City staff believes that NV5 is qualified to update the City’s Sewer Master Plan.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, Section 15301b; and

2. Award a contract to NV5 to provide an updated Sewer Master Plan and to develop a 10-year comprehensive prioritized Capital Improvement Program with recommended projects for a maximum contract amount of $499,265; and Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 7 of 13 ends

3. Approve an appropriation of $50,000 from the Sewer Maintenance Fund’s available balance to increase the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget for the Sewer Master Plan project (Task Code No. 2022-301) from $500,000 to $550,000; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and NV5 in a contract to provide the services; and

5. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders with NV5, as needed and determined by City staff, up to a total contract amount of $550,000. 9J. RENEWAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR VIRTUAL PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
Consideration of the circumstances of the state of emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic to determine whether remote teleconference meetings of the City Council, Committees, and Commissions can continue to be held under the provisions of AB 361.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency; and

3. Find that state or local officials have continued to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and

4. Direct staff, no later than 30 days after the City Council approves the recommended action, to report back on the state-proclaimed state of emergency so that City Council may reconsider the circumstances of the emergency, and, if appropriate, make findings to continue to hold virtual meetings of City legislative bodies pursuant to AB 361.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 8 of 13 ends

9K. AGREEMENT TO TRANSFER FUNDS” TO THE CITY OF STANTON OF THE BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS (BSCC) 2021-2022 NORTH

ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY COLLABORATIVE FUNDING PROGRAMS The City, as part of and on behalf of the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative, has been designated to receive $7,800,000 in 2021-2022 Corrections Planning and Grant Programs funding from the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). The funds will support a regional collaborative effort for the purpose of violence prevention, intervention, and suppression activities. The funds are to be spent during the funding period—from October 1, 2021 through June 30, 2026.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Receive and file the “Agreement to Transfer Funds” to the City of Stanton of the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) 2021-2022 North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative Funding Programs.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
10A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW SPDR-811, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 20-04, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PDP 20-07, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DA 20-04, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19119 AND ADOPTION OF THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR A NEW 79-UNIT TOWNHOME PROJECT INCLUDING 7 LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE UNITS LOCATED AT 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD IN THE

COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG), GENERAL MIXED-USE (GLMX) OVERLAY ZONE A public hearing to consider a new 79-unit, single family, townhome project including 7 low-income affordable units and associated improvements located at 12200 Beach Boulevard. Applications include Development Agreement DA 20-04, Site Plan and Design Review SPDR-811, Conditional Use Permit CUP 20-04, Planned Development Permit PDP 20-07 and Tentative Tract Map No. 19119.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council conduct a public hearing; and
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 9 of 13 ends

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-01 adopting an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the development of 79 townhome units including 7 low-income affordable units and associated improvements at 12200 Beach Boulevard, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 79
TOWNHOME UNITS INCLUDING 7-LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE
UNITS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS AT 12200 BEACH
BOULEVARD”; and

3. Introduce Ordinance No. 1118, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY

OF STANTON AND BONANNI DEVELOPMENT FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD WITHIN THE

CITY OF STANTON PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 65864 ET SEQ.”; and

4. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-02 approving Site Plan and Design Review SPDR-811, Conditional Use Permit C20-04, Planned Development Permit PDP 20-07 and Tentative Tract Map No. 19119 for a new 79-unit, townhome development including 7 low-income affordable units and associated improvements, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW SPDR811, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT C20-04, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PDP 20-07 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19119 FOR A NEW 79-UNIT TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT INLCUDING 7 LOWINCOME AFFORDABLE UNITS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12200 BEACH BOULEVARD
LOCATED IN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG), GENERAL MIXEDUSE (GLMX) OVERLAY ZONE”; and

5. Set Ordinance No. 1118 for second reading and adoption at the January 25, 2022 regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Taylor
Council Member Van
Council Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem Ramirez
Mayor Shawver
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 10 of 13 ends

11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
11A. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 1114
This Ordinance was introduced at the regular City Council meeting of December 14, 2021.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 1114, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA AMENDING STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 20, ZONING, SECTION

20.400.330 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, TO UPDATE THE CITY’S

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNIT (JADU) REGULATIONS”; and

2. City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1114.

ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Taylor
Council Member Van
Council Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem Ramirez
Mayor Shawver
11B. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 1116
This Ordinance was introduced at the regular City Council meeting of December 14, 2021.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 1116, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 6.06 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIRING “MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL
REDUCTION” AND FINDING SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT”; and

2. City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1116.

ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Taylor
Council Member Van
Council Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem Ramirez
Mayor Shawver
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 11 of 13 ends

12. NEW BUSINESS
12A. MAYOR’S APPOINTMENTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS AS REPRESENTATIVES TO

VARIOUS BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND AGENCIES
Traditionally, Council Members have been appointed by the Mayor to serve on numerous outside committees, boards, commissions and agencies. Each appointee is responsible for representing the City and voting on behalf of the City Council. The Mayor conducts a review and selects appointees, as detailed in Attachment A, with the exception of the Orange County Fire Authority (“OCFA”) appointment, which is required to be made by City Council Resolution, the Mayor may otherwise make appointments to each committee, board, commission or agency by nomination and Minute Order confirmation. In addition, the Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”) regulations require the adoption and posting of Form 806, Agency Report of Public Official Appointments, in order for individual Council Members to participate in a City Council vote that would result in him or her serving in a position that provides compensation of $250 or more in any 12-month period.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. City Council discuss and confirm the Mayor’s appointments; and

3. Approve Fair Political Practices Commission Form 806 and authorize the City Clerk to post the form on the City’s website.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 12 of 13 ends

12B. PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR 10692 AND 10712 BEACH

BOULEVARD AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
The attached Purchase and Sale Agreement would authorize the City to complete the purchase of 10692 and 10712 Beach Boulevard, Stanton, for appropriate public purposes and further revitalization of Beach Boulevard.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement (Agreement) for the properties of 10692 and 10712 Beach Boulevard, Stanton; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement and take other necessary actions to perform Stanton’s obligations under the Agreement; and

4. Appropriate $2,800,000 from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund (Fund 257).

13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC
At this time members of the public may address the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority, provided that NO action may be taken on non-agenda items.
• Members of the public wishing to address the Council/Agency/Authority during Oral Communications-Public or on a particular item are requested to fill out a REQUEST TO SPEAK form and submit it to the City Clerk. Request to speak forms must be turned in prior to Oral Communications-Public.
• When the Mayor/Chairman calls you to the microphone, please state your Name, slowly and clearly, for the record. A speaker’s comments shall be limited to a three (3) minute aggregate time period on Oral Communications and Agenda Items.

Speakers are then to return to their seats and no further comments will be permitted. • Remarks from those seated or standing in the back of chambers will not be permitted. All those wishing to speak including Council/Agency/Authority and Staff need to be recognized by the Mayor/Chairman before speaking.

14. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk January 11, 2022

Page 13 of 13 ends

15. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED BUSINESS 15A. COMMITTEE REPORTS/ COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY ANNOUNCEMENTS At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may report on items not specifically described on the agenda which are of interest to the community provided no discussion or action may be taken except to provide staff direction to report back or to place the item on a future agenda.
15B. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE MEETING At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future agenda. 15C. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE STUDY

SESSION
At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future study session agenda.

16. ITEMS FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL/AUTHORITY COUNSEL

17. ITEMS FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
17A. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY
At this time the Orange County Fire Authority will provide the City Council with an update on their current operations.

18. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted at the Post Office, Stanton Community Services Center and City Hall, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 6th day of January, 2022. s/ Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk/Secretary
December 3, 2021 - December 30, 2021
Electronic Transaction Nos.

Check Nos.

Demands listed on the attached registers
conform to the City of Stanton Annnal
Bo�&�JUfyCo�m

CITY OF STANTON

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE REGISTER
1675-1713
134551-134650
TOTAL
$
$
2,946,376.25
1,016,960.25
3,963,336.50 1
Demands listed on the attached
registers are accurate and funds
are available for payment thereof.
ldl!1� � \.

Finance Director
Item: 9B
Click here to return to the agenda

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 3 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 4 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 5 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 6 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 7 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 8 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 9 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 10 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 11 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 12 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 13 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 14 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 15 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 16 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 17 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 18 of 18 ends

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 1 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY

OF THE CITY OF STANTON
JOINT REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 14, 2021

1. CLOSED SESSION None.

2. CALL TO ORDER STANTON CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY JOINT REGULAR MEETING (6:30 PM)
The City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m. by Mayor / Chairman Shawver.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Ms. Zenia Bobadilla, Community Services Director.

4. ROLL CALL

Present: Council/Agency/Authority Member Ramirez, Council/Agency/Authority Member Van, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Taylor, and
Mayor/Chairman Shawver.

Absent: None.

Excused: Council/Agency/Authority Member Warren.

5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS None.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Ramirez pulled item 6L from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion.

Motion/Second: Ramirez/Van
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council/Agency/Authority Member Ramirez AYE Council/Agency/Authority Member Van AYE
Council/Agency/Authority Member Warren ABSENT
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Taylor AYE
Mayor/Chairman Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

Item: 9C
Click here to return to the agenda
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 2 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

CONSENT CALENDAR
6A. MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON

THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER

READING WAIVED
The City Council/Agency Board/Authority Board waived reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.
6B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
The City Council approved demand warrants dated November 5, 2021 – December 2, 2021, in the amount of $1,994,459.40.
6C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority approved Minutes of Special Joint – Study Session Meeting and Joint Regular Meeting – November 23, 2021. 6D. OCTOBER 2021 INVESTMENT REPORT
The Investment Report as of October 31, 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

1. The City Council finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Received and filed the Investment Report for the month of October 2021. 6E. OCTOBER 2021 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY)
The Investment Report as of October 31, 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

1. The Successor Agency finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Received and filed the Investment Report for the month of October 2021.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 3 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
6F. OCTOBER 2021 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT

AND STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended October 31, 2021, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section 2.20.080 (D) and is being provided to City Council. This report includes information for both the City’s General Fund and the Housing Authority Fund. In addition, staff has provided a status of the City’s Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) as of October 31, 2021.

1. The City Council finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Received and filed the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund’s October 2021 Revenue and Expenditure Report and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended October 31, 2021.
6G. SUPPORT FOR FEDERAL PFAS LEGISLATION THAT PROTECTS

RATEPAYERS AND WATER AGENCIES
Through a consultant hired by Orange County Water District (OCWD), OCWD is requesting the City adopt the attached Resolution supporting an exemption to proposed Congressional legislation, the PFAS Action Act of 2021 (H.R. 2467), that if enacted as-is may expose OCWD to the liability standard within the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which is also known as “Superfund”.

1. The City Council declared this action to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, since the action herein does not constitute a “project” as defined by section 15378 of the CEQA guidelines; and

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2021-43, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF STANTON,

CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING FEDERAL PFAS LEGISLATION THAT

PROTECTS RATEPAYERS AND WATER/WASTEWATER
AGENCIES”.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 4 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
6H. 2021 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT RELIEF FUNDING PROGRAM
Using funding from the Federal Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 (CRRSAA), the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) created a one-time “2021 Pavement Management Relief Funding (PMRF) Program.” The PMRF provides funding assistance for local street maintenance and rehabilitation projects classified as “minor collector” or above. Based upon a population formula which allocates a minimum of $200,000 to every local jurisdiction, OCTA has allocated $200,000 to the City of Stanton. In order to receive and use these funds, the City must adopt two Resolutions regarding the Federal funding through Caltrans and the CTC.

1. The City Council declared this action to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, since the action herein does not constitute a “project” as defined by section 15378 of the CEQA guidelines; and

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2021-44, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

STANTON, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE CITY COUNCIL HAS

AUTHORIZED THE PROJECT LIST SUBMITTAL FOR

CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE AND RELIEF SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 2021 (CRRSAA) FUNDING THROUGH
THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2021

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT RELIEF FUNDING (PMRF)
PROGRAM”; and

3. Adopted Resolution No. 2021-45, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

STANTON, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE CITY HAS THE

RESOURCES TO FUND THE PROJECTS IN THE FEDERAL FY
2022/2023 – 2027/2028 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM (FTIP) AND AFFIRMS ITS COMMITMENT TO
IMPLEMENT ALL PROJECTS IN THE PROGRAM.”
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 5 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
6I. PROPOSED CHANGES TO PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS The City Council has established Personnel Rules and Regulations as set forth in Title II, Chapter 2.44 of the Stanton Municipal Code. From time to time the provisions of the Personnel Rules are changed based on changes in federal or state law or the needs of the organization have changed.

1. The City Council declared that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15378 (b)(2) – continuing administrative or maintenance activities, such as purchases for supplies, personnel-related actions, general policy and procedure making; and

2. Approved Resolution No. 2021-40 amending the City of Stanton Personnel Rules and Regulations, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND ADOPTING
PERSONNEL RULES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY’S

PERSONNEL SYSTEM AND REPEALING ALL OTHER
RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS INCONSISTENT HEREWITH”.
6J. RESOLUTION CLASSIFYING AND FIXING COMPENSATION RANGES FOR

POSITIONS IN THE CITY SERVICE
The attached Resolution makes changes to the Position Classification Manual by modifying the salary range for the position of Intern, Park Ranger, and Recreation Leader.

1. The City Council declared that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15378(b)(2) – continuing administrative or maintenance activities, such as purchases for supplies, personnel-related actions, general policy or procedure making; and

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2021-41 amending the Salary Schedule for all City classifications, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

STANTON, CALIFORNIA, CLASSIFYING AND FIXING

COMPENSATION RANGES FOR POSITIONS IN THE CITY
SERVICE”.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 6 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
6K. APPROVE RESOLUTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT AND FIVE-YEAR REPORT MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006 (AB 1600)
The Fiscal Year 2020-21 Annual Financial Report of Development Impact Fees and the Five-Year Report for the five-year period ended June 30, 2021, is provided to City Council in Attachment A as required by California Government Code Section 66006, which was enacted by Assembly Bill No. 1600 (AB 1600). All development impact fees that have been collected, including interest earned on the fees, have been spent or have been earmarked for spending as of June 30, 2021.

Consequently, there are no funds that are required by California Government Code Section 66006 to be refunded to property owners. Attachment A, pages 18-20 include Resolution No. 2021-42 to approve the receive and file of this report and certain findings the California Government Code requires the City Council to affirm.

1. The City Council finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Approved Resolution No. 2021-42 to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Development Impact Fee Report and Five-Year Report and make certain findings pursuant to Government Code Section 66006, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
STANTON TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT AND FIVE-YEAR REPORT

AND MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66000 et seq.”
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 7 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
6M. OPTION TO JOIN NATIONAL OPIOID SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Consideration of opportunity to opt into a multi-district federal settlement agreement with distributors of opioids, Amerisource Bergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson, and opioid manufacturer Janssen (owned by Johnson & Johnson).

1. The City Council declared that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Opted into a settlement agreement with opioid distributors, Amerisource Bergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson, whereby the County of Orange will receive the City’s designated share of settlement funds and direct the City Manager to execute any documents necessary to implement the action; and

3. Opted into a settlement agreement with opioid manufacturer, Janssen (owned by Johnson & Johnson), whereby the County of Orange will receive the City’s designated share of the settlement funds and direct the City Manager to execute any documents necessary to implement the action.
6N. RENEWAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR VIRTUAL PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
Consideration of the circumstances of the state of emergency related to the COVID19 pandemic to determine whether remote teleconference meetings of the City Council, Committees, and Commissions can continue to be held under the provisions of AB 361.

1. The City Council declared that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and

3. Finds that state or local officials have continued to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and

4. Directed staff, no later than 30 days after the City Council approves the recommended action, to report back on the state-proclaimed state of emergency so that City Council may reconsider the circumstances of the emergency and, if appropriate, make findings to continue to hold virtual meetings of City legislative bodies pursuant to AB 361.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 8 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
6L. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DATA MAPPING OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC’S IMPACT ON STANTON
City staff recommends awarding a contract with total costs not-to-exceed $75,000 to Advance OC for data mapping of the COVID-19 pandemic’s disparate impact on Stanton communities. Advance OC’s data aggregation and visualization will provide interactive, dynamic dashboards that will inform and improve the design and execution of public health programs, as well as improve the efficacy of the City’s economic relief programs. The data mapping services are to be funded through the City’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocation.

Motion/Second: Ramirez/Taylor
Motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 4 (Ramirez, Shawver, Taylor, and Van)
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: 1 (Warren)
Motion unanimously carried.

1. The City Council declared that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Approved a Professional Services Agreement with Advance OC to provide data mapping; and

3. Authorized the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and Advance OC in a contract to provide these services.

Council Member Van requested to hear New Business Item 9B out of order.

Motion/Second: Van/Ramirez
Motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 4 (Ramirez, Shawver, Taylor, and Van)
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: 1 (Warren)
Motion unanimously carried.

The Mayor and City Council authorized the request New Business Item 9B was heard out of order.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 9 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
9B. CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE STANTON

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR TERMS COINCIDING WITH THE CITY

COUNCIL ELECTION
The Council Member holding the seat corresponding to that numbered seat on the Stanton Public Safety Committee shall be responsible for appointment of one Committee Member, with majority approval of the City Council. The terms of office shall coincide with the term of office of the Council Member or Mayor who made the appointment. Section 2.06.030 of the Stanton Municipal Code requires the submission of applications and interviews prior to appointment to any position.

Section 2.06.030 also provides that the City Council, by majority vote, may waive to the requirement interview persons previously appointed by the City Council and who are requesting re-appointment to another term.

Staff report by Ms. Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk.

1. The City Council finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. The City Council conducted interviews with the following Stanton Public Safety Committee applicants; and
• Mr. Apolonio “Pol” Maleniza
• Ms. Pamela Schoonover
• Mr. Peter Nguyen
• Ms. Wenddy Centeno

3. The City Council made an appointment to fill seat #5-Van on the Stanton Public Safety Committee as follows:

Seat #5 (Van):

Council Member Van selected Ms. Wenddy Centeno to fill the vacancy within Seat #5 on the Stanton Public Safety Committee.

Motion/Second: Taylor/Ramirez
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Ramirez AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Council Member Warren ABSENT
Mayor Pro Tem Taylor AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 10 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
Ms. Wenddy Centeno was appointed to fill Seat #5 (Van) on the Stanton Public Safety Committee.

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7A. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1116, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 6.06 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIRING “MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION” AND FINDING SAME EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Due to California Senate Bill 1383 (Short-Lived Climate Pollutants: Organics Waste Methane Emissions Reductions), the City is obligated to incorporate new regulations into the Stanton Municipal Code. This Ordinance proposes to add Section 6.06 to the Code requiring waste generators (residents and businesses) to reduce disposal of organic waste (food waste and green waste) by diverting it from landfills, through recycling or other methods, and includes a State-mandated enforcement program for non-compliance. Additional programs must be developed by the City and the City’s franchise waste hauler to support other organics waste disposal reduction efforts.

Staff report by Mr. Joe Ames, Public Works Director / City Engineer.

The City Council questioned staff regarding sufficient notice and education on Senate Bill 1383 by CR&R to the City’s residents, enhance outreach, multiple language offerings, which entity is responsible to compliance, which entity is responsible for issuing citations, compost/mulch (procurement requirement), request for demonstration, request for a public forum by CR&R.

The public hearing was opened.

No one appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed.

Motion/Second: Taylor/Ramirez
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Ramirez AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Council Member Warren ABSENT
Mayor Pro Tem Taylor AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council conducted a public hearing; and
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 11 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

2. Declared that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15308 on the grounds that it can be seen with certainty that the enhanced solid waste regulations, as provided for in Ordinance No. 1116 will not have a significant effect on the environment and that the new requirements, which strengthen requirements for the handling of solid waste, represent actions by a regulatory agency (the City) for the protection of the environment; and

3. Introduced Ordinance No. 1116, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
STANTON, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 6.06 OF THE
STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIRING “MANDATORY
ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION” AND FINDING SAME

EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT;” and

4. Set said Ordinance for adoption at the January 11, 2022 regularly scheduled City Council meeting; and

5. Appointed Council Member Van and Mayor Pro Tem Taylor to serve on a solid waste procurement services ad-hoc subcommittee to review rate proposals from the City’s franchise waste hauler for compliance with the requirements of SB 1383, if needed.
7B. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO ZTA 21-01 AMENDING STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 20, ZONING, SECTION

20.400.330 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, UPDATING THE CITY’S

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNIT (JADU) REGULATIONS IN SPECIFIED SINGLE FAMILY AND

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES
Consider Zoning Text Amendment updating Section 20.400.330 related to Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units.

Staff report by Ms. Jennifer A. Lilley, Community and Economic Development Director.

The public hearing was opened.

No one appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 12 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
Motion/Second: Ramirez/Van
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Ramirez AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Council Member Warren ABSENT
Mayor Pro Tem Taylor AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council conducted a public hearing; and

2. Finds the proposed project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under California Public Resources Code Section 21080.17, which exempts the adoption of an accessory dwelling unit ordinance to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 of the California Government Code, and

3. Adopted Ordinance No. 1114 approving Zoning Text Amendment ZTA 21- 01 amending Stanton Municipal Code Title 20, Zoning, Section 20.400.330 Accessory Dwelling Units, updating the City’s Accessory Dwelling Unit and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit regulations in specified single family and multifamily residential zones, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF STANTON,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 20,
ZONING, SECTION 20.400.330 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS,
TO UPDATE THE CITY’S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU)

AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (JADU)
REGULATIONS”; and

4. Set said Ordinance for adoption at the January 11, 2022, regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 13 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
7C. ADOPTION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTERS 19.23 AND

20.211 TO THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO-UNIT PROJECTS UNDER SB 9; AND FINDING THE ACTION

TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
The proposed ordinance implements Senate Bill 9 by adding Chapter 19.23 to the City’s Subdivision title, to address urban lot splits, and Chapter 20.211 to the City’s Zoning title, to address two-unit projects in single-family residential zones. Staff recommends an urgency ordinance to ensure that the City’s SB 9 standards are in place before the new laws take effect on January 1, 2022.

Staff report by Ms. Jennifer A. Lilley, Community and Economic Development Director.

The public hearing was opened.

No one appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed.

Motion/Second: Ramirez/Taylor
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Ramirez AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Council Member Warren ABSENT
Mayor Pro Tem Taylor AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council conducted a public hearing; and

2. Declared that this Ordinance under California Government Code sections 65852.21, subd. (j), and 66411.7, subd. (n), the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implementing the provisions of Government Code sections 66411.7 and 65852.21 and regulating urban lot splits and two-unit projects is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Therefore, adoption of this ordinance is statutorily exempt from CEQA because it implements these new laws enacted by SB 9; and

3. Introduced and adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1115, entitled:
“AN URGENCY ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTERS 19.23 AND

20.211 TO THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE
URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO-UNIT PROJECTS UNDER SB 9;
AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA.”
DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 14 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None.

9. NEW BUSINESS
9A. CONSIDERATION OF EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT WITH

BRANDYWINE HOMES, C&C DEVELOPMENT, AND NATIONAL CORE

REGARDING THE TINA-PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Consideration of an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement by and between the City of Stanton and Brandywine Homes, C&C Development, and National Core to provide an exclusive negotiation period to attempt to negotiate a disposition and development agreement and other necessary agreements.

Staff report by Mr. Jarad L. Hildenbrand, City Manager.

City Council questioned staff regarding community input in the creation of the relocation plan, first right of refusal, returning residents, responsible party in securement of additional funding, request for a commitment that there would be no disparity between the market rate housing and affordable housing areas, shared amenities/equitable shared amenities, resident timelines, and the process for the residents who reside in privately owned properties.

In Person Public Comment:
• Ms. Daisy Cruz, The Kennedy Commission, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE and spoke further regarding unclear
relocation/development timelines and reported that residents are leaving the neighborhood due to the uncertainty.
• Ms. Yesenia Hernandez, Community Action Partnership Orange County, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE and expressed her concerns with the lack of a written plan, the lack of
communication/information being provided to the Tina/Pacific residents pertaining to the plan and timeline of relocation for the Tina/Pacific residents, the current and unfavorable living conditions, and would like to ensure that the residents are better informed and not excluded from the process. • Ms. Elizabeth Gonzalez, resident, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE and expressed her concerns with the lack of
communication/information being provided to the Tina/Pacific residents pertaining to the plan and timeline of relocation for the Tina/Pacific residents, DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 15 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
would like to ensure that the residents are better informed and not excluded from the process, inquired about the non-city owned properties within the neighborhood, and the process should the City move forward in purchasing those privately owned properties.
• Mr. Juan Gonzalez, resident, spoke regarding his concerns with the lack of communication/information being provided to the Tina/Pacific residents pertaining to the plan and timeline of relocation for the Tina/Pacific residents and would like to ensure that the residents are better informed and not excluded from the process.
• Ms. Sesilia Tovake, resident spoke regarding her concerns with the lack of communication/information being provided to the Tina/Pacific residents pertaining to the plan and timeline of relocation for the Tina/Pacific residents, the current and unfavorable living conditions, and would like to ensure that the residents are better informed and not excluded from the process. • Ms. Juliana Tlaseca, resident, spoke regarding her concerns with the lack of communication/information being provided to the Tina/Pacific residents pertaining to the plan and timeline of relocation for the Tina/Pacific residents, the confusion with private and City owned properties, and would like to ensure that the residents are better informed and not excluded from the process.

Written Communication:
• Ms. Ugochi Anaebere-Nicholson, Public Law Center, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE.
• Ms. Michaela Marroquin, resident, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE expressing her concerns with the lack of communication/information being provided to the Tina/Pacific residents pertaining to the plan and timeline of relocation for the Tina/Pacific residents within the ENA and would like to ensure that the residents are better informed and not excluded from the process.
• Ms. Agripina Lopez, resident, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE expressing her concerns with the lack of communication/information being provided to the Tina/Pacific residents pertaining to the plan and timeline of relocation for the Tina/Pacific residents within the ENA and would DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 16 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
like to ensure that the residents are better informed and not excluded from the process.
• Mr. Cesar Covarrubias, The Kennedy Commission, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE and recommended changes to the ENA to address state affordable housing law when considering the redevelopment of the Tina/Pacific neighborhood.
• Mr. Curtis Gibbs, Community Action Partnership Orange County, spoke in opposition to the planned action by the City of Stanton to enter into the proposed Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Homes, C & C Development and National CORE stating that the City does not address state affordable housing laws within the ENA and requests that the City provide a replacement housing plan, a timeline and specific descriptions for preparing a relocation assistance plan as required by law, that a proposal must be written within the ENA that the City and the developer will work in collaboration with a resident-led committee on a relocation plan, and ensure that residents are not excluded from this process.

Motion/Second: Ramirez/Taylor
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Ramirez AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Council Member Warren ABSENT
Mayor Pro Tem Taylor AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council declared that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Approved an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with Brandywine Acquisitions Group, C&C Development Co., and National Community Renaissance of California regarding the Tina-Pacific Neighborhood (APN 126- 481-01 through 29 and APN 126-482-05 through 15); and

3. Authorized the City Manager to execute the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 17 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
New Business item 9B was heard out of order.
9B. CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE STANTON

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR TERMS COINCIDING WITH THE CITY

COUNCIL ELECTION

10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS – PUBLIC None.

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None.

12. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN/COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED BUSINESS 12A. COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member Ramirez reported on the Santa’s Siren Express Event in collaboration with the Youth Assistance Foundation, City of Stanton, Orange County Fire Authority, Orange County Sheriff’s Department, CARE Ambulance, Stanton Lions Club, Boys & Girls Club of Stanton, CR&R, ASES volunteers, and YAF volunteers which is scheduled to take place on December 19, 2021. 12B. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE COUNCIL

MEETING
Mayor Shawver requested to agendize an update pertaining to the Tina/Pacific neighborhood development project.
12C. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE STUDY

SESSION
None.
12D. RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING MAYOR PRO TEM GARY TAYLOR
The Mayor and City Council presented a certificate recognition to outgoing Mayor Pro Tem Gary Taylor.

The Mayor and City Council expressed their gratitude to outgoing Mayor Pro Tem Gary Taylor for his efforts throughout the year.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 18 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
12E. REORGANIZATION OF CITY COUNCIL
Annually, the City Council elects a Mayor Pro Tem.

The City Clerk opened nominations for Mayor Pro Tem.

Mayor Shawver nominated Council Member Rigoberto A. Ramirez for the office of Mayor Pro Tem.

The City Clerk closed nominations for Mayor Pro Tem.

Motion/Second: Shawver/Taylor
Motion unanimously carried by the following vote:

AYES: 4 (Ramirez, Shawver, Taylor, and Van)
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: 1 (Warren)
Council Member Rigoberto A. Ramirez was unanimously elected Mayor Pro Tem.

13. ITEMS FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL/AUTHORITY COUNSEL None.

14. ITEMS FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
• Mr. Jarad L. Hildenbrand, City Manager, reported on the Stanton Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony Event, which was held on December 9, 2021. • Mr. Jarad L. Hildenbrand, City Manager, reported on the upcoming Redistricting Stanton 2021 Public Hearing #2, which is scheduled to be held on December 16, 2021 at 5:00 pm at Stanton city hall, council chambers. • Ms. Zenia Bobadilla, Community Services Director reported on the City’s scheduled holiday events within the City such as the Santa’s Siren Express Event, which is scheduled to be held on December 19, 2021. 14A. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY
Battalion Chief Eric Miranda provided the City Council with an update on their current operations.

DRAFT
Joint Regular Meeting – December 14, 2021 - Page 19 of 19

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

15. ADJOURNMENT Motion/Second: Shawver/
Motion carried at 9:20 p.m.
_______________________________________

MAYOR/CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
_______________________________________

CITY CLERK/SECRETARY
DRAFT
Special Meeting – December 16, 2021 - Page 1 of 3

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON
SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 16, 2021
REDISTRICTING PUBLIC HEARING #2

1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Ramirez.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Mr. Jarad L. Hildenbrand, City Manager.

3. ROLL CALL

Present: Council Member Taylor, Council Member Warren, and Mayor Pro Tem Ramirez.

Absent: Council Member Van.

Excused: Mayor Shawver.

SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY

4. NEW BUSINESS
4A. PUBLIC HEARING – THE REDRAWING OF COUNCIL MEMBER DISTRICT

BOUNDARIES
Every 10 years, cities with by-district election systems must use new data from the Census to review and, if needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. This process, called redistricting, ensures that all districts have a nearly equal population. The redistricting process for the City of Stanton must be completed by April 17, 2022.

Introduction by Ms. Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk.

Presentation by Mr. Patrick Donegan, Best Best & Krieger.

Council Member Van arrived at 5:05 PM.

The City Council questioned staff regarding population per district, total population, ensuring that communities of interest remain in intact, and projected population.

The public hearing was opened.

DRAFT
Special Meeting – December 16, 2021 - Page 2 of 3

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
In Person Public Comment:
• Mr. John Warren, resident spoke regarding the history of the City’s redistricting process, communities of interest, and expressed his gratitude to the City Council for their current redistricting efforts.

Written Communication:
• Naoko Gorsuch, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• Juan Hernandez, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• George Blas G. Jamandre, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• Jeanette A. Jamandre, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• Stephen Takeshita, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• Sue Becker, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• Ferry Oroudji, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• Cardinal Property Management, AAMC, on behalf of the Crosspointe Village Board of Directors requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• R. Williamson, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.
• Jennifer Woodward, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.

DRAFT
Special Meeting – December 16, 2021 - Page 3 of 3

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
• Laura Usherwood, resident requested that the City Council ensure that their neighborhood Crosspointe Village be considered as a community of interest and remain intact and within a single district.

No one else appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed.

1. The City Council declared the action not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and will have no result direct or indirect to physical changes in the environment; and

2. Received a report from staff and the City’s redistricting consultant on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to redraw district boundaries; and

3. Conducted a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries.

5. ADJOURNMENTMotion/Second: Ramirez/
Motion carried at 5:32 p.m.
_______________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________________

CITY CLERK
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: January 11, 2022
SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 2021 INVESTMENT REPORT
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of November 30, 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of November 2021.

BACKGROUND:

Changes in the City’s cash and investment balances for the month of November are summarized below:

Between October 31, 2021, and November 30, 2021, the City’s total cash and investments increased by approximately $8.7 million. During the month of November, the City received $7.8 million from the State of California for the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative, for which the City is the fiscal agent.

The attached reports summarize the City investments and deposit balances as of November 30, 2021. The City’s cash and investment balances by fund type are presented in Attachment A. A summary of the City’s investment portfolio is included as Attachment B. The detail of the City’s investments by type are shown in Attachment C.

Beginning Balance Net Change Ending Balance
Cash and Investment Accounts (Pooled-All Funds) $ 50,249,871.48 $ 8,781,610.61 $ 59,031,482.09 Cash (Non-Pooled) 4,662,003.44 (68,654.90) 4,593,348.54 Total Cash and Investments $ 54,911,874.92 $ 8,712,955.71 $ 63,624,830.63 Item: 9D
Click here to return to the agenda
2 ANALYSIS:

The monthly cash and investment report provides a summary of the cash and investment accounts held by the City as of the end of that month. In order to manage its cash and investments, the City combines cash resources from all funds into a single pool consisting of a variety of accounts and securities. The balance in the pooled cash account includes cash and certain liquid investments that are available to meet the City’s current cash needs. Cash in excess of the City’s current cash needs is invested in interest-bearing investments with various maturities.

Detailed information regarding the securities contained in the City’s investment portfolio is provided in Attachments B and C. As of November 30, 2021, City investments consisted of the following:

As of November 30, 2021, the average purchase yield to maturity earned on the City’s total investment portfolio was 0.60%, which is above the benchmark LAIF return of 0.20%.

The weighted average maturity of the City’s was approximately 104 days (approximately 3 ½ months) as of November 30, 2021, which is in compliance with the City’s investment policy restriction of 3.5 years.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Investment Policy. The portfolio will allow the City to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. Staff remains confident that the investment portfolio is currently positioned to remain secure and sufficiently liquid.

The City Treasurer controls a $50.2 million portfolio, with $9.6 million in investments held in a safekeeping account with Bank of the West.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT :

None.

Market Value as of
November 30,
2021
Average
Interest
Rate
Percentage of
Portfolio
Invested by
Type
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Permitted by
Investment
Policy In Compliance?
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) $ 34,344,768.24 0.20% 68.47% 100.00% Yes California Asset Management Program (CAMP) 6,252,007.79 0.05% 12.46% 100.00% Yes Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 7,810,831.42 2.46% 15.57% 30.00% Yes Municipal Bonds 1,751,808.55 2.25% 3.49% 100.00% Yes
Total Investments $ 50,159,416.00 100.00%
3 LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION :

Through the normal agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED

4. Ensure Fiscal Stability and Efficiency in Governance Prepared by: Approved by:
/s/ Michelle Bannigan /s/ Jarad L. Hildenbrand
________________________________ __________________________ Michelle Bannigan, CPA Jarad L. Hildenbrand
Finance Director City Manager
Attachments:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments Portfolio Summary
C. Investment Portfolio Detail
Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance 101-various General Fund $ 18,846,666.23 $ 1,539,235.56 $ (1,402,169.85) $ 18,983,731.94 102-111101 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) (87,240.68) 431,205.76 (305,608.31) 38,356.77 210-111101 Certified Access Specialists (CASP) Program 44,801.17 - - 44,801.17 211-111101 Gas Tax Fund 971,624.54 151,634.44 (24,724.66) 1,098,534.32215-111101 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation act (RMRA) Fund 65,606.77 537,956.13 (7,215.00) 596,347.90 220-111101 Measure M Fund 733,574.03 111,255.87 - 844,829.90 221-111101 Community Development Block Grant-COVID-19 (CDBG-CV) Fund (127,500.00) 127,500.00 - - 222-111101 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund 212,212.34 - - 212,212.34 223-111101 Protective Services Fund (1,312.50) 63,558.96 (62,246.46) - 224-111101 Lighting Maintenance 1919 Act Fund 212,466.91 38,943.13 (10,382.35) 241,027.69 225-111101 Lighting/Median Maintenance 1972 Act Fund 1,120,819.61 36,088.41 (22,692.11) 1,134,215.91 226-111101 Air Quality Improvement Fund 177,102.43 - (19,814.67) 157,287.76 242-111101 Supplemental Law Enforcement Grant Fund (current) 404,833.02 19,319.67 (12,500.00) 411,652.69 250-111101 Families and Communities Together (FaCT) Grant Fund 26,300.60 (37,161.77) (18,831.41) (29,692.58) 251-111101 Senior Transportation Fund 51,574.21 8,231.12 (3,843.16) 55,962.17 257-111101 America Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) Fund 4,283,931.73 6,271.20 (49,832.69) 4,240,370.24 261-111101 Street Impact Fees Fund 81,296.10 6,766.00 - 88,062.10 262-111101 Traffic Signal Impact Fees Fund 49,618.44 1,513.00 - 51,131.44 263-111101 Community Center Impact Fees Fund 155,422.06 5,015.00 - 160,437.06 264-111101 Police Services Impact Fees Fund 140,403.04 4,539.00 - 144,942.04 280-111101 Stanton Central Park Maintenance Fund (14,202.67) 3,428.34 (8,092.00) (18,866.33) 285-various Stanton Housing Authority Fund 12,394,498.96 1,410.00 (68,698.50) 12,327,210.46 305-111101 Capital Projects Fund 278,929.05 7,215.00 (7,215.00) 278,929.05 310-111101 Park and Recreation Facilities Fund 3,477,189.10 189,941.00 3,667,130.10 - 501-111101 Sewer Maintenance Fund 5,082,600.41 231,843.34 (4,377.71) 5,310,066.04502-111101 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund 94.53 6,242.75 - 6,337.28 602-111101 Workers' Compensation Fund 545,221.01 5,874.48 - 551,095.49603-111101 Liability Risk Management Fund 118,018.50 - - 118,018.50 604-111101 Employee Benefits Fund 14,732.60 112,090.74 (65,690.59) 61,132.75605-111101 Fleet Maintenance Fund 507,350.23 9,712.86 (117,347.67) 399,715.42801-111101 City Trust Fund (9,896.52) - (17,548.50) (27,445.02) 901-111101 North Orange County Public Safety Task Force (NOCPSTF) Trust Fund 7,800,000.00 84,249.24 (301.75) 7,883,947.49 Total Pooled Cash and Investments(1) $ 50,249,871.48 $ 11,010,743.00 $ (2,229,132.39) $ 59,031,482.09 Less: Investments(1) $ (50,190,634.19) $ (259.96) $ 31,478.15 $ (50,159,416.00) Cash - Bank of the West General Checking Account $ 59,237.29 $ 11,010,483.04 $ (2,197,654.24) $ 8,872,066.09

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2021

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda
Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2021

CASH-NON-POOLED
101-111103 Payroll Account $ - $ 230,307.28 $ (230,307.28) $ -101-111109 Flexible Spending/AFLAC 5,238.99 - (180.48) 5,058.51 101-111505 Petty Cash 600.00 - (100.00) 500.00
604-111404 Cash with Fiscal Agent (PARS) (2) - 4,656,164.45 (68,374.42) 4,587,790.03 Total Cash-Non-Pooled $ 4,662,003.44 $ 230,307.28 $ (298,962.18) $ 4,593,348.54

INVESTMENTS
POOLED ALL FUNDS $ 50,190,634.19 $ 259.96 $ (31,478.15) $ 50,159,416.00Total Investments (3) $ 50,190,634.19 $ 259.96 $ (31,478.15) $ 50,159,416.00 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 54,911,874.92 $ 11,241,050.28 $ (2,528,094.57) $ 63,624,830.63 Notes:
(3)
- The Portfolio Summary Report and Holdings by Security Type are included in Attachments B and C, respectively. (1)
- Pooled cash includes: City's Bank of the West general checking and safekeeping accounts, the City's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) account, the Housing Authority's LAIF account, the California Asset Management Program (CAMP) account, and the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) account. (2)
- The Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) account is an irrevocable trust that can be used for pension and other post employment benefits only. This fund is excluded from the compliance requirements set forth in the City's investment policy.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 2 ends

City of Stanton
Distribution
Group By: Portfolio Name
Average By: Face Amount/Shares
Portfolio / Report Group: All Portfolios
As of: 11/30/2021
Bank of the West | Fixed Assets 9,303,000.00 2.420 9,319,816.20 553 18.62 9,562,639.97 9,308,594.28 1.48 CAMP 6,252,007.79 0.050 6,252,007.79 1 12.51 6,252,007.79 6,252,007.79 0.00 LAIF | City 21,216,703.09 0.203 21,216,703.09 1 42.47 21,180,601.56 21,216,703.09 0.00 LAIF | Housing Authority 13,186,604.50 0.203 13,186,604.50 1 26.40 13,164,166.68 13,186,604.50 0.00 TOTAL / AVERAGE 49,958,315.38 0.597 49,975,131.58 104 100 50,159,416.00 49,963,909.66 0.28 Portfolio Name Face Amount/Shares YTM @ Cost Cost Value Days To Maturity % of Portfolio Market Value Book Value Duration To Maturity

ATTACHMENT B
Click here to return to the agenda
City of Stanton
Portfolio Holdings
Investment Portfolio | by Security Sector
Report Format: By Transaction
Group By: Security Sector
Average By: Face Amount / Shares
Portfolio / Report Group: All Portfolios
As of 11/30/2021
Description CUSIP/Ticker
Settlement
Date
YTM @
Cost
Face
Amount/Shares Cost Value Book Value Market Value
Maturity
Date
Days To
Maturity
Accrued
Interest
% of
Portfolio
Certificate Of Deposit
Allegiance Bank TX 2.65 2/14/2023 01748DBB1 4/11/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 255,899.79 2/14/2023 441 289.25 0.50 American Eagle Bank IL 2.1 5/23/2022 02554BCN9 6/9/2017 2.100 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 151,390.50 5/23/2022 174 60.41 0.30 American Express UT 2.35 8/8/2022 02587DV47 8/8/2017 2.350 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 250,658.07 8/8/2022 251 1,812.91 0.49 American Express UT 2.4 8/29/2022 02587CFU9 8/29/2017 2.400 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 251,050.80 8/29/2022 272 1,461.70 0.49 Bank Hapoalim NY 2.9 3/25/2024 06251AW48 4/24/2019 2.900 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 262,980.00 3/25/2024 846 1,310.96 0.50 Bank of New England NH 2.65
5/23/2024 06426KBE7 5/23/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 260,922.12 5/23/2024 905 126.55 0.50 Capital One Bank VA 2.35 3/15/2022 140420Z52 3/15/2017 2.350 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 249,589.68 3/15/2022 105 1,213.50 0.50 Capital One VA 2.3 7/19/2022 14042RGN5 7/19/2017 2.300 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 250,307.33 7/19/2022 231 2,085.63 0.49 Cornerstone Community Bank CA 2.6
5/17/2024 219240BY3 5/17/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 260,578.50 5/17/2024 899 230.58 0.50 EagleBank MD 2.65 4/28/2023 27002YEL6 4/30/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 256,933.14 4/28/2023 514 0.00 0.50 Evansville Teachers FCU IN 2.25
7/22/2024 299547AV1 7/22/2019 2.250 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 258,681.12 7/22/2024 965 122.79 0.50 First Technology FCU CA 3.35
9/27/2023 33715LCJ7 9/27/2018 3.350 240,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 252,504.00 9/27/2023 666 66.08 0.48 First Tier Bank NE 1.95 8/23/2024 33766LAJ7 8/23/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 256,748.88 8/23/2024 997 93.12 0.50 Goldman Sachs Bank NY 2.35
6/21/2022 38148PKX4 6/21/2017 2.350 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 249,981.29 6/21/2022 203 2,576.24 0.49 Greenstate FCU IA 1.95 2/28/2023 39573LAF5 8/28/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 253,932.69 2/28/2023 455 26.61 0.50 Healthcare Systems FCU VA 2.65
4/25/2024 42228LAD3 4/25/2019 2.650 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 257,584.14 4/25/2024 877 642.97 0.49 Horizon Bank NE 1.7 8/29/2023 44042TBQ6 7/29/2019 2.101 249,000.00 245,090.70 247,330.95 256,462.53 8/29/2023 637 11.60 0.50 I&C Bank of China, NY 2.15 4/12/2022 45581EAC5 8/15/2019 2.104 247,000.00 247,296.40 247,040.60 248,803.10 4/12/2022 133 261.89 0.49 Main Street Bank VA 2.6 4/26/2024 56065GAG3 4/26/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 260,439.06 4/26/2024 878 70.95 0.50 McGregor TX 2.3 6/28/2024 32112UDA6 7/12/2019 2.200 249,000.00 250,170.30 249,607.42 260,610.87 6/28/2024 941 31.38 0.50 Merrick Bank UT 2.6 8/23/2023 59013J7P8 4/23/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 258,178.14 8/23/2023 631 124.16 0.50 Morgan Stanley NY 3.1 2/7/2024 61760AVJ5 2/7/2019 3.100 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 259,409.46 2/7/2024 799 2,402.71 0.49 Morgan Stanley UT 3.1 2/7/2024 61690UDW7 2/7/2019 3.100 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 259,409.46 2/7/2024 799 2,402.71 0.49 Mountain America CU UT 3 3/27/2023 62384RAF3 4/9/2019 2.840 249,000.00 250,494.00 249,497.31 257,652.75 3/27/2023 482 61.40 0.50 Raymond James Bank FL 2 8/23/2024 75472RAE1 8/23/2019 2.000 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 255,022.56 8/23/2024 997 1,339.89 0.49 Sallie Mae Bank UT 2.3 8/2/2022 795450B61 8/2/2017 2.300 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 251,509.20 8/2/2022 245 1,875.29 0.50 State Bank India NY 2.35 3/14/2022 8562846V1 3/14/2017 2.350 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 249,574.80 3/14/2022 104 1,229.47 0.50 Synchrony Bank UT 2.4 5/19/2022 87165EL96 5/19/2017 2.400 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 249,600.91 5/19/2022 170 178.65 0.49

ATTACHMENT C

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda
Description CUSIP/Ticker
Settlement
Date
YTM @
Cost
Face
Amount/Shares Cost Value Book Value Market Value
Maturity
Date
Days To
Maturity
Accrued
Interest
% of
Portfolio
TIAA FSB FL 2.1 7/29/2022 87270LCM3 7/29/2019 2.100 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 250,112.20 7/29/2022 241 1,762.16 0.49 University of Iowa CU IA 3.05 5/15/2023 91435LAG2 4/25/2019 2.919 248,000.00 249,240.00 248,444.59 257,552.96 5/15/2023 531 600.98 0.50 Washington Federal Bank WA 1.95
8/28/2024 938828BN9 8/28/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 256,751.37 8/28/2024 1,002 26.61 0.50 Sub Total / Average Certificate Of
Deposit 2.459 7,583,000.00 7,583,291.40 7,582,920.87 7,810,831.42 566 24,499.15 15.18 Local Government Investment Pool
CAMP LGIP CAMP3001 2/29/2020 0.050 6,252,007.79 6,252,007.79 6,252,007.79 6,252,007.79 N/A 1 12.51 LAIF | City LGIP LAIFCITY0895 2/29/2020 0.203 21,216,703.09 21,216,703.09 21,216,703.09 21,180,601.56 N/A 1 42.47 LAIF | Housing Authority LGIP LAIFHA0004 2/29/2020 0.203 13,186,604.50 13,186,604.50 13,186,604.50 13,164,166.68 N/A 1 26.40 Sub Total / Average Local
Government Investment Pool 0.179 40,655,315.38 40,655,315.38 40,655,315.38 40,596,776.03 1 0.00 81.38 Municipal
Arvin Community CA 2.5 3/1/2023 043288AK5 8/8/2019 2.350 275,000.00 276,399.75 275,490.61 281,283.75 3/1/2023 456 1,699.65 0.55 Fort Bragg CA 1.871 8/1/2024 347028JZ6 9/18/2019 1.750 205,000.00 206,150.05 205,630.30 208,075.00 8/1/2024 975 1,267.86 0.41 Riverside Pension CA 2.5 6/1/2022 769036BB9 6/20/2017 2.251 500,000.00 505,800.00 500,587.38 505,135.00 6/1/2022 183 6,215.28 1.00 Riverside Pension CA 2.5 6/1/2022 769036BB9 7/24/2017 2.401 240,000.00 241,080.00 240,111.47 242,464.80 6/1/2022 183 2,983.33 0.48 Riverside Pension CA 2.75 6/1/2024 769036BD5 8/28/2019 2.030 250,000.00 258,120.00 254,267.79 259,580.00 6/1/2024 914 3,418.40 0.50 Stockton CA 2.5 9/1/2023 861403AU7 5/1/2019 2.600 250,000.00 248,975.00 249,585.86 255,270.00 9/1/2023 640 1,545.14 0.50 Sub Total / Average Municipal 2.247 1,720,000.00 1,736,524.80 1,725,673.41 1,751,808.55 494 17,129.66 3.44 Total / Average 0.597 49,958,315.38 49,975,131.58 49,963,909.66 50,159,416.00 104 41,628.81 100

ATTACHMENT C

Page 2 of 2 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Successor Agency DATE: December 14, 2021
SUBJECT: OCTOBER 2021 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY) REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of October 31, 2021, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

1. Successor Agency find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of October 2021.

BACKGROUND:

The attached reports summarize the Successor Agency investments and deposit balances as of October 2021. During the month of October, the Successor Agency’s total cash and investment balances decreased by approximately $6,154. The Agency’s cash and investment balances by fund are presented in Attachment A. The Agency’s investments and deposits are included as Attachment B.

ANALYSIS:

The Agency’s share of the City’s investment in the State Treasurer’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) continues to be available on demand. The effective yield on LAIF for the month of October 2021 was 0.20%.

The Agency’s investments are shown on Attachment B and have a weighted investment yield of 0.20%, which is equal to the benchmark LAIF return of 0.20%, as the entire portfolio (excluding funds held with the bond fiscal agents) represents the Successor Agency’s portion of LAIF and Bank of the West funds invested by the City.

Item: 9E
Click here to return to the agenda
2 With a completely liquid portfolio, the weighted average maturity of the Agency’s investments on October 31, 2021, is 1 day. LAIF’s average maturity on October 31, 2021, is approximately 335 days.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Investment Policy.

The portfolio will allow the Agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None
LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

4. Ensure Fiscal Stability and Efficiency in Governance Prepared by: Approved by:
/s/ Michelle Bannigan /s/ Jarad L. Hildenbrand
________________________________ __________________________ Michelle Bannigan, CPA Jarad L. Hildenbrand
Finance Director City Manager
Attachments:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments and Deposits
Fund/
Account No. Fund/Account Name
Beginning
Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance

CASH-POOLED
712-111101 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund $ 2,089,881.29 $ - $ (427,866.46) $ 1,662,014.83 Total Cash-Pooled (1) $ - 2,089,881.29 $ $ (427,866.46) $ 1,662,014.83 CASH-RESTRICTED (with Fiscal Agent)
712-111423 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A and B $ 1,350,555.09 $ 5.74 $ 1,350,560.83 - $ 712-111425 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series C and D 1,825,884.30 7.75 - 1,825,892.05 712-111426 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series A 0.21 423,699.790 - 423,700.00 Total Cash-Restricted (with Fiscal Agent) $ 3,176,439.60 $ 423,713.28 $ 3,600,152.88 - $ TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 5,266,320.89 $ 423,713.28 $ (427,866.46) $ 5,262,167.71 Note:
(1) - Includes the Successor Agency's share of the City's Bank of the West checking account and Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2021
ATTACHMENT A Click here to return to the agenda

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

INVESTMENTS AND DEPOSITS
Investment Issuer/ Date of Market MV
Type Institution Broker Maturity Cost Value Source
LAIF and BOW General Acct State of California/ BOW State of California On Demand 0.20% N/A $ 1,662,015 $ 1,662,015 LAIF Total Cash Investments and Deposits 1 0.20% $ 1,662,015 $ 1,662,015 Weighted AverageWeighted Average
Bond Funds Held by Trustees: Maturity (days) Yield
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturity Rate Value Cost Value Source 2016 Series A and BDebt Service:Cash Equivalents US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% $ 23 $ 23 $ US Bank 23 Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1,045,000 1,045,000 1,045,000 US Bank Interest:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 305,538 305,538 US Bank 305,538 Total 2016 Series A and B $ 1,350,561 $ 1,350,561
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturit
y Rate
Value Cost
Value Source
2016 Series C and DDebt Service:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% $ 11 $ 11 $ US Bank 11 Interest:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 645,881 645,881 US Bank 645,881 Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1,180,000 1,180,000 1,180,000 US Bank Total 2016 Series C and D $ 1,825,892 $ 1,825,892
MONTH ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2021
Rate
Interest

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturity Rate Value Cost Value Source 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Special Fund:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 423,700$ $ 423,700 $ US Bank 423,700 Total 2010 Tax Allocation Bonds (Tax-Exempt) $ 423,700 $ 423,700 Total Bond Fund Investments and Deposits (3) $ 3,600,153 3,600,153 $ TOTAL - ALL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $5,262,168 $5,262,168 Notes:
(1) - There have been no exceptions to the Investment Policy. (2) - The Successor Agency is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.(3) - Restricted Bond Funds are held by the fiscal agent.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 2 of 2 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
DATE: January 11, 2022
SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 2021 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE

REPORT AND STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended November 30, 2021, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

2.20.080 (D) and is being provided to City Council. This report includes information for both the City’s General Fund and the Housing Authority Fund. In addition, staff has provided a status of the City’s Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) as of November 30, 2021.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund’s November 2021 Revenue and Expenditure Report and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended November 30, 2021.

ANALYSIS:

General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachments A and B summarize the General Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through November 30, 2021. The reports include information for the month of November, on a year-to-date basis through November, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through November) is included as well.

As of November 30, total General Fund revenues received to date was approximately $6.9 million represents 26% of the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budgeted amount and is Item: 9F
Click here to return to the agenda
2 approximately $693,000 (11%) higher than the revenues collected for the same period last year (Attachment A, page 2). The primary reason for the increase is because of increased taxes collected during the current year for property tax, transient occupancy tax, sales tax, and transaction and use tax. In addition, the General Fund received $101,376 from the County of Orange for its share of waste disposal revenue related to Fiscal Year 2020/21. (This revenue was not recorded in the prior fiscal year because it was received after the City’s cut-off date of August 31, 2021.) Total General Fund expenditures were approximately $9.4 million through November 30, which represents 35% of the 2021/22 projected expenditures and is approximately $375,000 (4%) higher than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year (Attachment B, page 2). The primary reason for the increase is due to law enforcement and fire protection services contact costs which were 7% and 5% higher, respectively, than the same period last year.

Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachment D summarizes the Housing Authority Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through November 30, 2021. The report includes information for the activity during the month of November, information on a year-to-date basis through November, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through November) is included as well.

As of November 30, total Housing Authority Fund revenues received to date was $731,784, which represents 112% of the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budgeted amount and is approximately $573,000 (360%) more than the revenue collected through the same period last year. In October, the Housing Authority received $606,902 for the sale of the property located at 7455 Katella Avenue.

Total Housing Authority Fund expenditures were approximately $1.4 million through November 30, which represents 34% of the 2021/22 projected expenditures and is approximately $1.4 million (49%) lower than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year. In November 2020, the Housing Authority made $2.6 million in payments for Project Homekey.

Status of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) (Attachment F) The Fiscal Year 2021/22 CIP budget includes $3.3 million from the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Adopted Budget and $822,843 in carryover funding from Fiscal Year 2020/21, for a total amended budget of $4.2 million as of November 30, 2021. As of November 30, capital project expenditures totaled $27,357 (less than 1% of the amended budget) with an additional $142,693 (3% of the amended budget) under contract (encumbered) for work currently underway, for a total amount spent or encumbered to date of $170,050 (4% of the amended budget) as of November 30, 2021.
3 FISCAL IMPACT:

Per Attachment C, the City’s General Fund reserves is expected to be $22.2 million by June 30, 2022.

Per Attachment E, the City’s Housing Authority Fund reserves is expected to be $10.2 million by June 30, 2022.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED

4. Ensure Fiscal Stability and Efficiency in Governance Prepared by: Approved by:
/s/ Michelle Bannigan /s/ Jarad L. Hildenbrand
________________________________ __________________________ Michelle Bannigan, CPA Jarad L. Hildenbrand
Finance Director City Manager
Attachments:

A. November 2021 General Fund Revenues
B. November 2021 General Fund Expenditures
C. General Fund Reserves Projected as of June 30, 2022
D. November 2021 Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditures E. Housing Authority Fund Available Fund Balance Projected as of June 30, 2022 F. Status of Capital Improvement Projects as of November 30, 2021 %
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2020/21 From Budget Budget November Actual * Budget Actual Prior Year TAXES
Property Tax $ 7,213,500 $ 7,213,500 $ 205,359 $ 269,418 3.73% 254,905 $ 5.69%Sales and Use Tax 4,810,000 4,810,000 300,882 1,379,843 28.69% 1,243,992 10.92%Transactions and Use Tax 4,998,000 4,998,000 431,206 1,505,850 30.13% 1,258,026 19.70% Transient Occupancy Tax 480,000 480,000 51,793 241,676 50.35% 217,089 11.33% Franchise Fees 1,109,500 1,109,500 108,551 242,293 21.84% 264,608 ‐8.43% Business Licenses 160,000 160,000 39,370 47,966 29.98% 29,270 63.87% Utility Users Tax 1,881,000 1,881,000 162,284 733,941 39.02% 723,782 1.40%Tax Increment Pass‐thru Payment 338,000 338,000 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐  ** TAXES‐TOTAL 20,990,000 20,990,000 1,299,445 4,420,987 21.06% 3,991,672 10.76%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
County WDA Shared Revenue 160,000 160,000 ‐  101,376 63.36% ‐ 100.00% Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐  ** Motor Vehicle In Lieu 20,000 20,000 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐  **
Public Safety Augmentation Tax 161,075 161,075 14,568 53,337 33.11% 38,515 38.48% INTERGOVERNMENTAL‐TOTAL 371,075 371,075 14,568 154,713 41.69% 38,515 301.70%CHARGES FOR SERVICES Charges for Services 105,280 86,030 7,691 40,569 47.16% 36,490 11.18% Information Technology Charges 30,345 30,345 2,529 12,644 41.67% 10,119 100.00% CHARGES FOR SERVICES‐TOTAL 135,625 116,375 10,220 53,213 45.73% 46,609 14.17%

FEES AND PERMITS
Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,150,000 1,150,000 91,312 376,478 32.74% 337,202 11.65% Building Permits and Fees 1,300,000 1,300,000 176,905 396,621 30.51% 783,452              ‐49.38%Planning Permits and Fees 106,250 106,250 5,295 36,083 33.96% 37,699                ‐4.29% Engineering Permits and Fees 73,300 73,300 4,015 32,966 44.97% 33,526                ‐1.67%Public Benefit Fee ‐  ‐  ‐  ‐  **   ‐ 314,237 100.00% Recycling Fees 93,750 93,750 19,525 19,525 20.83% 20,320.000 **Other Permits and Fees 267,500 267,500 50,487 89,136 33.32% 242,513              ‐63.24%Community Services Fees 46,500 46,500 5,206 34,402 73.98% 6,865 80.04% FEES AND PERMITS ‐TOTAL 3,037,300 3,037,300 352,745 985,211 32.44% 1,775,814 ‐44.52% November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2021/22

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 11 ends

Click here to return to the agenda
%
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2020/21 From Budget Budget November Actual * Budget Actual Prior Year November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2021/22

FINES AND FORFEITURES
General Fines 600 600 70 18,114 3019.00% 54 33444.44%
Motor Vehicle Fines 120,670 120,670 3,291 18,774 15.56% 24,503                ‐23.38% Parking Citations 205,000 205,000 31,822 96,442 47.04% 105,112 ‐8.25% DMV Parking Collections 70,300 70,300 4,218 23,337 33.20% 17,811 31.03% Administrative Citation 15,000 15,000 1,100 2,560 17.07% 1,900 34.74% FINES AND FORFEITURES‐TOTAL 411,570 411,570 40,501 159,227 38.69% 149,380 6.59%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
Investment Earnings 185,000 185,000 ‐ 44,692 24.16% 58,231                ‐23.25% Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐  ‐  (29,185) (130,833) ** (29,033) 350.64% Interest on Loan to Landscape District Fund 16,570                ‐  16,570 7,255 43.78% ‐  100.00% Rental Income 28,305 28,305 1,935 20,986 74.14% 6,360 229.97% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY‐TOTAL 229,875 229,875 (27,250)                   ‐ (57,900) 25.19% 35,558                ‐262.83%

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
Miscellaneous Revenue 198,700 269,500 70,937 117,938 43.76% 13,950 745.43% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE‐TOTAL 198,700 269,500 70,937 117,938 43.76% 13,950 745.43%

TRANSFERS IN
From Gas Tax Fund 205,000 205,000 17,083 85,417 41.67% 50,208 70.13% From Protective Services Fund 375,000 375,000 60,934 65,510 17.47% 103,541              ‐36.73% From Supplemental Law Enforcement Grants Fund 150,000 150,000 12,500 62,500 41.67% 38,996 60.27% From Housing Authority Fund ‐  890,000 ‐  890,000 100.00% ‐  100.00% TRANSFERS IN‐TOTAL 730,000 1,620,000 90,517 1,103,427 68.11% 192,745 82.53% TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $ 26,104,145 $ 27,045,695 $ 1,851,683 $ 6,936,816 25.65% 6,244,243 $ 11.09% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund430100 Current Year‐Secured $ 1,144,000 $ 1,144,000 $ 188,911 $ 188,911 16.51% 193,927 ‐2.59% 430105 Current Year‐Unsecured 32,500 32,500 ‐  18,532 57.02% 15,549 19.18% 430115 Property Tax‐Supplemental 23,000 23,000 1,676 4,038 17.56% 3,321 21.59% 430120 Residual Redevelopment Property Tax 1,267,000 1,267,000 ‐  ‐ 0.00% ‐  ** 430121 In‐Lieu Vehicle License Fee 4,640,000 4,640,000 ‐  ‐                   0.00% ‐  ** 430135 Homeowners Tax Relief 1,000 1,000 ‐  ‐                   0.00% ‐  ** 430140 Property Transfer Tax 106,000 106,000 14,772 57,937 54.66% 42,108 37.59% 430200 Sales And Use Tax 4,810,000 4,810,000 300,882 1,379,843 28.69% 1,243,992 10.92% 430300 Transient Occupancy Tax 480,000 480,000 51,793 241,676 50.35% 217,089 11.33% 430405 Franchise Tax/Cable TV 224,500 224,500 51,718 51,718 23.04% 85,382 ** 430410 Franchise Tax/Electric 214,000 214,000 ‐  ‐                   0.00% ‐  ** 430415 Franchise Tax/Gas 58,000 58,000 ‐  ‐                   0.00% ‐  ** 430420 Franchise Tax/Refuse 525,000 525,000 56,833 190,575 36.30% 179,226 6.33% 430425 Franchise Tax/Water 88,000 88,000 ‐  ‐                   0.00% ‐  ** 430500 Business License Tax 160,000 160,000 39,370 47,966 29.98% 29,270 63.87% 430600 Util User Tax/Electricity 935,500 935,500 104,491 449,349 48.03% 445,174 0.94% 430605 Util User Tax/Telephone 316,000 316,000 16,189 67,870 21.48% 75,731 ‐10.38% 430610 Util User Tax/Gas 211,000 211,000 19,475 58,859 27.90% 41,598 41.49% 430615 Util User Tax/Water 418,500 418,500 22,129 157,863 37.72% 161,279 ‐2.12% 440100 AB 1389 Pass Through from RDA 338,000 338,000 ‐  ‐                   0.00% ‐  ** 101 General Fund 15,992,000 15,992,000 868,239 2,915,137 18.23% 2,733,646 6.64% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)430250 Transactions & Use Tax 4,998,000 4,998,000 431,206 1,505,850 30.13% 1,258,026 19.70% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) 4,998,000 4,998,000 431,206 1,505,850 30.13% 1,258,026 19.70% TAXES ‐ TOTAL $ 20,990,000 $ 20,990,000 $ 1,299,445 $ 4,420,987 21.06% $ 3,991,672 10.76% TAXES
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 3 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund433100 Charges For Services $ 105,280 $ 86,030 $ 7,691 $ 40,569 47.16% 36,490 $ 11.18%433136 Information Technology Charges 30,345 30,345 2,529 12,644 41.67% 10,119 19.97% CHARGES FOR SERVICES ‐ TOTAL $ 135,625 $ 116,375 $ 10,220 $ 53,213 45.73% $ 46,609 14.17%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 4 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund432121 County WDA Shared Revenue $ 160,000 160,000$ $ ‐ $ 101,376 63.36% $ ‐ 100.00% 432135 Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐  ** 432150 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 20,000 20,000 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐  **432180 Public Safety Augmentation Tax 161,075 161,075 14,568 53,337 33.11% 38,515 27.79% INTERGOVERNMENTAL  ‐ TOTAL $ 371,075 $ 371,075 $ 14,568 $ 154,713 41.69% $ 38,515 301.70%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 5 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund431100 Building Plan Check Fees $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 4,882 $ 92,390 131.99% 31,693 $ 191.52% 431105 Mechanical Permits 250,000 250,000 19,250 33,450 13.38% 107,130              ‐68.78% 431110 Building Permits 750,000 750,000 127,690 211,528 28.20% 513,463              ‐58.80% 431115 Plumbing Permits 80,000 80,000 10,995 17,265 21.58% 42,805                ‐59.67% 431120 Electrical Permits 150,000 150,000 14,088 41,988 27.99%                ‐ 88,361 52.48% 431130 Engineering Plan Check Fees 33,300 33,300 ‐ 11,160 33.51%                ‐ 14,745 24.31% 431135 Public Works Permits 40,000 40,000 4,015 21,806 54.52% 18,781 16.11% 431140 S M I P ‐ Commercial Fees 500 500 ‐ 6 1.20% 121 ‐95.04% 431145 S M I P‐Residential Permits 1,000 1,000 ‐ 8 0.80% 7 14.29% 431146 SB 1473 Fee 2,500 2,500 206 387 15.48% 1,277 ‐69.69% 431150 Grading Plan Review ‐ ‐ 2,890 4,335 ** 8,670 ‐50.00% 431155 Grading Permits ‐ ‐ 735 2,205 ** 2,940 ‐33.33%
431160 Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,150,000 1,150,000 91,312 376,478 32.74% 337,202 11.65% 431185 Parking Permits 50,000 50,000 4,000 5,407 10.81%                  ‐ 6,843 20.98% 431190 Towing Franchise Fee 30,000 30,000 2,340 10,980 36.60% 25,920                ‐57.64% 431194 Public Benefit Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 314,237 ‐100.00%
431195 Other Fees & Permits 15,000 15,000 2,650 11,000 73.33% 15,535                ‐29.19% 431200 Cannabis Business Initial Permit Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 140,400 ‐100.00% 433200 Conditional Use Permit 6,000 6,000 ‐ 9,940 165.67% ‐ 100.00% 433205 Precise Plan Of Design 15,000 15,000 ‐ 1,050 7.00% 6,160 ‐82.95%433210 Variance 2,000 2,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 433220 Preliminary Plan Review 6,000 6,000 1,875 7,500 125.00% 1,875 75.00% 433225 Environmental Services 4,400 4,400 ‐ 430 9.77% 2,315 ‐81.43% 433227 Foreclosure Registration 10,850 10,850 563 2,252 20.76% 4,375 ‐48.53% 433230 Zoning Entitlements 5,000 5,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
433235 Land Divisions 10,000 10,000 ‐ 2,500 25.00% 3,730 ‐32.98% 433240 Special Event Permits 500 500 180 180 36.00% 180 0.00%433245 Sign/Ban'R/Gar Sa/Temp Use Per 6,000 6,000 450 3,370 56.17% 1,315 156.27% 433250 Ministerial Services 15,000 15,000 995 6,275 41.83% 6,220 0.88%

FEES AND PERMITS
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22

ATTACHMENT A

Page 6 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund

FEES AND PERMITS
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
433260 Landscape Plan Check 1,000 1,000 325 975 97.50% ‐ 100.00% 433270 General Plan Maint Surcharge 15,000 15,000 1,087 1,402 9.35%                ‐ 10,500 86.65% 433285 Other Developmental Fees 5,000 5,000 ‐ 389 7.78% 1,209 ‐67.82%433305 General Recreation Programs 24,000 24,000 2,591 19,662 81.93% ‐ 100.00% 433315 Sports Fields 22,500 22,500 2,615 14,740 65.51% 6,865 53.43% 437115 Recycling Fees 93,750 93,750 19,525 19,525 20.83% 20,320                ‐3.91% 430505 New/Moved Bus Lic Appl Rev 40,000 40,000 2,450 14,350 35.88% 14,230 0.84% 430510 Business Tax Renewal Process 130,000 130,000 32,400 37,400 28.77% 24,362 53.52% 430515 SB 1186 3,000 3,000 2,636 2,878 95.93% 2,028 41.91% FEES AND PERMITS ‐ TOTAL $ 3,037,300 $ 3,037,300 $ 352,745 $ 985,211 32.44% 1,775,814 $      ‐44.52% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 7 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund434100 General Fines $ 600 $ 600 $ 70 $ 18,114 3019.00% $ 54 33444.44% 434105 Motor Vehicle Fines 120,670 120,670 3,291 18,774 15.56% 24,503                ‐23.38% 434110 Parking Citations 205,000 205,000 31,822 96,442 47.04% 105,112              ‐8.25% 434115 DMV Parking Collections 70,300 70,300 4,218 23,337 33.20% 17,811 31.03%434120 Administrative Citations 15,000 15,000 1,100 2,560 17.07% 1,900 34.74% FINES AND FORFEITURES ‐ TOTAL $ 411,570 $ 411,570 $ 40,501 $ 159,227 38.69% $ 149,380 6.59%

FINES AND FORFEITURES
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 8 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund435100 Interest Earned $ 185,000 $ 185,000 $ ‐ $ 44,692 24.16% $             ‐ 58,231 23.25% 435110 Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐  ‐  (29,185) (130,833) ** (29,033) 350.64% 435200 Interest on Loan to Landscape District Fund 16,570                 ‐  16,570 7,255 43.78% ‐  100.00% 436125 Indoor Facility Rental ‐  ‐  240 960 **                 ‐ (2,144) 144.78% 436127 Outdoor Picnic Shelters 7,450 7,450 1,695 11,305 151.74% ‐  100.00% 436135 Pac Bell Mobile Svcs‐Rent 20,855 20,855 ‐  8,721 41.82% 8,504 2.55% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY ‐ TOTAL $ 229,875 $ 229,875 $ (27,250) $          ‐ (57,900) 25.19% $            ‐ 35,558 262.83%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22

ATTACHMENT A

Page 9 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund432256 Grant (non‐government agency) $ 4,200 $ 74,200 $ 70,903 $ 73,611 99.21% $ 3,004 2350.43% 437100 Sale Of Publications ‐ ‐ 1 121 ** 3 3933.33%
437105 Firework Services 475 475 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
437125 Donations ‐ 800 ‐ 800 100.00% ‐ 100.00%
437135 Expense Reimbursement ‐ ‐ ‐ 39,292 ** 7,500 80.91% 437137 Loan Repayment from Landscape Maintenance District 164,025 164,025 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 437195 Other Revenue 30,000 30,000 33 4,114 13.71% 3,443 19.49% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE ‐ TOTAL $ 198,700 $ 269,500 $ 70,937 $ 117,938 43.76% $ 13,950 745.43%

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 10 of 11 ends

FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget November Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund439211 Transfer From Gas Tax Fund $ 205,000 $ 205,000 $ 17,083 $ 85,417 41.67% $ 50,208 41.22%439223 Transfer From Protective Services Fund 375,000 375,000 60,934 65,510 17.47% 103,541              ‐58.05%439242 Transfer Fr Supp Law Enf Grant 150,000 150,000 12,500 62,500 41.67% 38,996 37.61% 439285 Transfer From Housing Authority ‐ 890,000 ‐ 890,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% TRANSFERS IN ‐ TOTAL $ 730,000 $ 1,620,000 $ 90,517 $ 1,103,427 68.11% 192,745 $ 82.53%

TRANSFERS IN
November 2021 General Fund Revenues (42% of year)
FY 2021/22

ATTACHMENT A

Page 11 of 11 ends

Division
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
1100 City Council 116,710 $ $ 116,710 $ 4,966 $ 54,499 46.70% 41,024 $ 32.85% 1200 City Attorney 302,000 302,000 49,149 49,715 16.46% 33,721 47.43%1300 City Manager 473,195 473,195 38,417 196,520 41.53% 177,262 10.86%1400 City Clerk 190,515 190,515 13,806 73,747 38.71% 67,340 9.51%1410 Personnel/Risk Management 176,885 176,885 10,936 59,451 33.61% 53,014 12.14% 1510 Information Technology 524,980 531,098 34,294 262,279 49.38% 298,215 ‐12.05% Administration 1,784,285 1,790,403 151,568 696,211 38.89% 670,576 3.82% 1500 Finance 862,565 890,691 57,718 314,185 35.27% 332,097 ‐5.39% 1600 Non‐Dept (excludes Transfers) 48,000 48,000 446 446 0.93%   ‐ 1,154 61.35% Finance 910,565 938,691 58,164 314,631 33.52% 333,251 ‐5.59% 1520 Emergency Preparedness 5,000 57,796 ‐                 13,373 23.14% ‐ 100.00% 2100 Law Enforcement 12,197,850 12,197,850 1,021,429 5,088,251 41.71% 4,721,226 7.21% 2200 Fire Protection 5,166,860 5,166,860 ‐                 1,283,387 24.84% 1,227,265 4.57% 2230 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 100 100 4.00%   ‐ 1,286 92.22% 2400 Animal Control Services 191,390 191,390 ‐                 46,305 24.19%                   ‐ 90,405 95.24% 2500 Public Safety‐Other 110,175 110,175 5,669 60,714 55.11% 58,651 3.52% 4300 Parking Control 250,890 250,890 19,253 100,384 40.01% 89,365 12.33% 6200 Code Enforcement 519,870 519,870 39,267 195,525 37.61% 181,588 7.68% Public Safety 18,444,535 18,497,331 1,085,718 6,788,039 36.70% 6,369,786 6.57% 3000 Public Works Administration 507,575 521,468 35,199 195,298 37.45% 201,982 ‐3.31% 3100 Engineering 145,390 167,390 105 34,393 20.55%                   ‐ 62,847 45.28% 3200 Public Facilities 436,340 436,340 50,527 157,904 36.19% 120,129 31.45% 3300 Crossing Guard 43,165 43,165 6,073 11,413 26.44% ‐ 100.00% 3400 Parks Maintenance 412,680 443,580 31,502 155,454 35.05% 137,972 12.67% 3500 Street Maintenance 498,980 498,980 25,161 135,967 27.25% 165,401 ‐17.80%3600 Storm Drains 115,860 115,860 ‐                 3,796 3.28% 460 725.22% 6300 Graffiti Abatement 101,900 101,900 3,143 15,193 14.91%                   ‐ 29,985 49.33% Public Works 2,261,890 2,328,683 151,710 709,418 30.46% 718,776 ‐1.30% 4000 Community Development Administration 313,625 313,625 17,376 132,163 42.14% 79,410 66.43% 4100 Planning 344,590 610,987 74,142 194,462 31.83% 140,185 38.72% City of Stanton
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
% Change
from Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1 of 23 ends

Click here to return to the agenda
Division
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
City of Stanton
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
% Change
from Prior
Year
4200 Building Regulation 784,255 784,255 5,621 91,403 11.65% 307,928                 ‐70.32% 4400 Business Relations 37,800 37,800 570 570 1.51% 150 280.00% Community Development 1,480,270 1,746,667 97,709 418,598 23.97% 527,673 ‐20.67% 5000 Public Information Office (1) 120,600 120,600 9,092 43,352 35.95% 50 99.88% 5100 Community Services Administration 509,015 579,515 32,124 208,638 36.00% 271,755 ‐23.23% 5200 Community Center Operations 170,530 170,530 5,794 31,512 18.48% 1,785 1665.38% 5300 Park Operations 224,470 224,470 17,706 83,212 37.07% 59,917 38.88%5400 Senior Citizen Programs 61,515 61,815 3,566 22,057 35.68% 17,762 24.18% 5500 Recreation Programs (1) 48,900                ‐                 48,900 15,646 32.00% ‐ 100.00% Community Services 1,135,030 1,205,830 68,282 404,417 33.54% 351,269 15.13% Transfer to FACT Grant 17,100 17,100 1,425 7,125 41.67%                   ‐ 10,313 44.74% Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 10,565 10,565 1,031 3,039 28.76% 1,600 89.94% Transfer to SCP Maintenance 41,140 41,140 3,428 17,142 41.67% ‐ 100.00% Transfers to Other Funds 68,805 68,805 5,884 27,306 39.69% 11,913 129.21% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 26,085,380 $ 26,576,410 $ 1,619,035 $ 9,358,620 35.21% 8,983,244 $ 4.18% (1) ‐ New division in the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Adopted Budget. * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 2 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund1100 City Council501105 Salaries‐Elected $ 52,200 $ 52,200 4,023$ $ 22,077 42.29% 20,568$ 7.34% 502120 Medicare/Fica 740 740 58 320 43.24% 298 7.38%502130 Other Benefit Charges 770 770 61 394 51.17% 296 33.11% 602100 Special Dept Expense 10,000 10,000 110 5,386 53.86% 2,508 114.75% 602110 Office Expense 2,000 2,000 59 113 5.65% 234 ‐51.71%602115 Postage ‐  ‐  ‐               3 ** 5 ‐40.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 36,585 36,585 ‐               18,368 50.21% 13,455 36.51% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 11,000 11,000 655 5,023 45.66% 125 97.51% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 3,415 3,415 ‐               2,815 82.43% 3,535 ‐25.58% 1100 City Council Total 116,710 116,710 4,966 54,499 46.70% 41,024 32.85% 1200 City Attorney608105 Professional Services 302,000 302,000 49,149 49,715 16.46% 33,721 47.43%1200 City Attorney Total 302,000 302,000 49,149 49,715 16.46% 33,721 47.43% 1300 City Manager501110 Salaries‐Regular 269,710 269,710 23,037 105,127 38.98% 91,871 14.43% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ 26 101 ** ‐                 100.00% 502100 Retirement 79,735 79,735 5,752 26,452 33.17% 22,623 16.93% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 6,250 6,250 456 2,082 33.31% ‐                 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 25,545 25,545 3,117 12,133 47.50% 8,435 43.84% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,100 2,100 85 425 20.24% ‐               100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 525 525 ‐               ‐  0.00% 2 ‐100.00% 502120 Medicare/Fica 3,580 3,580 334 1,517 42.37% 1,332 13.89% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,730 1,730 203 925 53.47% 46 95.03%602110 Office Expense 1,200 1,200 281 2,076 173.00% 2,112 ‐1.70%602115 Postage 250 250 ‐               2 0.80% 12 ‐500.00%607100 Membership/Dues 800 800 ‐               926 115.75% 400 56.80% Administration ‐ Vazquez
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 3 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Administration ‐ Vazquez
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
1300 City Manager, Continued607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 5,600 5,600 1,068 1,820 32.50% 266 85.38%608105 Professional Services 48,000 48,000 4,000 20,000 41.67% 20,265 ‐1.33% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 700 700 58 292 41.71% 296 ‐1.37%612115 Liability Insurance Charge 27,470 27,470 ‐               22,642 82.42% 29,602 ‐30.74% 1300 City Manager Total 473,195 473,195 38,417 196,520 41.53% 177,262 10.86% 1400 City Clerk501110 Salaries‐Regular 110,905 110,905 8,225 41,651 37.56% 39,128 6.45% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐  ‐  40 152 ** 133 14.29%
502100 Retirement 34,480 34,480 2,769 14,020 40.66% 12,883 8.83% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,985 1,985 163 825 41.56% ‐               100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 19,080 19,080 1,498 6,841 35.85% 6,537 4.65% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 330 330 ‐               ‐  0.00% 2 ** 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,550 1,550 115 584 37.68% 540 8.15% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 965 965 72 367 38.03% 20 94.55% 602110 Office Expense 2,250 2,250 227 1,302 57.87% 128 90.17%602115 Postage 500 500 48 186 37.20% 183 1.61%602120 Books/Periodicals 100 100 ‐               ‐  0.00% ‐               ** 607100 Membership/Dues 1,130                   ‐               1,130 215 19.03% 520 ‐141.86% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 750 750 ‐               ‐  0.00% ‐               ** 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐               70 2.80% ‐               100.00% 608105 Professional Services 6,000 6,000 601 1,481 24.68% 980 51.12% 608140 Elections 360 360 ‐               ‐  0.00% (1,179) ‐100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 580 580 48 242 41.72% 244 ‐0.83% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 7,050 7,050 ‐               5,811 82.43% 7,221 ‐24.26% 1400 City Clerk Total 190,515 190,515 13,806 73,747 38.71% 67,340 9.51% 1510 Information Technology
501110 Salaries‐Regular 81,120 81,120 5,744 32,600 40.19% 29,453 10.68% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 4 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Administration ‐ Vazquez
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
1510 Information Technology, Continued501115 Salaries‐Overtime 10,000 10,000 ‐               2,172 21.72% 2,126 2.16% 502100 Retirement Charges 22,940 22,940 1,934 10,344 45.09% 9,251 11.81% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,320 1,320 114 645 48.86% ‐               100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 19,550 19,550 1,259 5,755 29.44% 5,424 6.10% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 300 300 ‐               ‐  0.00% ‐               100.00% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,080 1,080 75 467 43.24% 423 10.40% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 680 680 51 287 42.21% 15 100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies 15,000 15,000 2,101 4,454 29.69% 4,111 8.34% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 25,000 25,000 ‐               2,975 11.90% 12,541 ‐321.55% 604100 Communications 97,900 97,900 15,236 33,135 33.85% 30,585 7.70% 608100 Contractual Services 244,925 244,925 7,708 164,704 67.25% 104,892 57.02% 608145 Information Technology ‐  ‐  ‐               ‐  ** 18,972 ‐100.00% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 5,165 5,165 ‐               4,257 82.42% ‐               100.00%701050 Computer Software ‐  6,118 72 484 7.91% 41,532 ‐98.83% 701105 Equipment‐General ‐  ‐  ‐               ‐  ** 38,890 ‐100.00% 1510 Information Technology Total 524,980 531,098 34,294 262,279 49.38% 298,215 ‐12.05% TOTAL ADMINISTRATION‐VAZQUEZ 1,607,40 $ 0 $ 1,613,518 140,632$ $ 636,760 39.46% 617,562$ 3.11% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 5 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description
101 General Fund1410 Personnel/Risk Management501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 91,820 $ 91,820 $ 6,592 $ 33,411 36.39% 31,144$ 7.28% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐  ‐  ‐  244 ** ‐                100.00%502100 Retirement 18,940 18,940 1,541 7,808 41.22% 7,077 10.33% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,590 1,590 131 662 41.64% ‐                100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 16,075 16,075 1,070 4,900 30.48% 5,348 ‐8.38% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐  ‐  100 500 ** ‐                100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 300 300 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐                **502120 Medicare/FICA 1,285 1,285 97 493 38.37% 455 8.35% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 800 800 58 294 36.75% 16 1737.50%602110 Office Expense 1,400 1,400 ‐  33 2.36% 169 ‐80.47% 602115 Postage 200 200 20 51 25.50% 68 ‐33.33%607100 Membership/Dues 725 725 ‐  425 58.62% 300 29.41% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 2,000 2,000 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐              **607115 Training 6,000 6,000 (248)   ‐ (163) 2.72% ‐             100.00% 607120 Education Reimbursement Program 10,000 10,000 ‐  ‐  0.00% ‐              ** 608105 Professional Services 10,000 10,000 1,074 1,927 19.27% 5,286 ‐63.55% 608125 Advertising/ Business Dev't 1,800 1,800 199 2,117 117.61% 75 2722.67% 609125 Employee/Volunteer Recognition 7,500 7,500 251 1,681 22.41% 2,820 ‐40.39% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 610 610 51 254 41.64% 256 ‐0.79% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 5,840 5,840 ‐  4,814 82.43% ‐              100.00% TOTAL ADMINISTRATION‐GUZMAN 176,885 $ $ 176,885 $ 10,936 $ 59,451 33.61% 53,014$ 12.14% Administration ‐ Guzman
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
% of Budget Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 6 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund1500 Finance501110 Salaries‐Regular 466,220 $ $ 466,220 $ 34,850 $ 174,725 37.48% 163,087 $ 7.14% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 500 500 ‐ 116 23.20% ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 42,415 42,415 3,388 17,197 40.54% 22,019 ‐21.90% 502100 Retirement 112,590 112,590 9,313 46,770 41.54% 41,150 13.66% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 8,960 8,960 757 3,800 42.41% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 53,520 53,520 3,923 17,904 33.45% 15,740 13.75% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,920 4,920 505 2,525 51.32% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,935 1,935 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 752 ‐100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 7,120 7,120 479 2,398 33.68% 2,315 3.59% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 4,470 4,470 308 1,546 34.59% 399 74.19% 602110 Office Expense 8,000 8,000 ‐ 501 6.26% 614 ‐18.40% 602115 Postage 5,000 5,000 546 945 18.90% 560 40.74%
602120 Books/Periodicals 415 415 129 130 31.33% ‐ 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 795 795 97 192 24.15% 110 42.71% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 4,200 4,200 470 1,259 29.98% ‐ 100.00%607115 Training 1,700 1,700 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 150 ‐100.00% 608105 Professional Services 88,035 116,161 2,075 13,714 11.81% 16,358 ‐19.28% 608107 Financial Services 17,600 17,600 708 3,222 18.31% 6,650 ‐51.55% 608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 24,001 ‐100.00%
611116 Payment to Other Agencies ‐ ‐ 68 68 ** 55 23.64% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 1,220 1,220 102 508 41.64% 515 ‐1.38% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 32,350 32,350 ‐ 26,665 82.43% 37,622 ‐41.09% 702100 Furniture‐Office 600 600 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
1500 Finance Total 862,565 890,691 57,718 314,185 35.27% 332,097 ‐5.39% Finance‐Bannigan
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 7 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Finance‐Bannigan
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
1600 Non‐Departmental602100 Special Dept Expense 3,000 3,000 446 446 14.87% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐                 **                  ‐ 1,154 100.00% 611105 Revenue Sharing‐City of Anaheim 40,000 40,000 ‐                 ‐                 0.00% ‐ ** 611116 Payment to Other Agencies 5,000                ‐                 5,000 ‐                 0.00% ‐ ** 1600 Non‐Departmental Total 48,000 48,000 446 446 0.93% 1,154 ‐61.35% TOTAL FINANCE $ 910,565 $ 938,691 $ 58,164 $ 314,631 33.52% 333,251 $ ‐5.59% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 8 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund1520 Emergency Services602140 Materials & Supplies 5,000 $ $                ‐ 5,000 $ $ 55 1.10% $ ‐ 100.00%608105 Professional Services ‐ 52,796 ‐                 13,318 25.23% ‐ 100.00% 1520 Emergency Services 5,000 57,796 ‐                 13,373 23.14% ‐ 100.00% 2100 Law Enforcement
602100 Special Dept Expense 3,000 3,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% 527 ‐100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,500 1,500 162 767 51.13% 265 65.45% 602145 Gas/Oil/Lube 3,000 3,000 236 297 9.90% 571 ‐92.26% 603125 Vehicle Maintenance ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** 1,925 ‐100.00% 604100 Communications 36,030 36,030 ‐                 14,716 40.84% 21,779               ‐32.43% 608100 Contractual Services 18,350 18,350 1,529 7,645 41.66% 4,678 63.42% 608160 O.C.S.D. Contract 8,629,270 8,629,270 713,169 3,580,352 41.49% 2,109,464 69.73% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 8,700 8,700 725 3,625 41.67%                 ‐ 3,675 1.38%702100 Furniture‐Office ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 108 ‐100.00% 2100 Law Enforcement Total 8,699,850 8,699,850 715,821 3,607,402 41.47% 2,142,992 40.59% 2200 Fire Protection602100 Special Department Expense 40,800 40,800 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608185 O.C.F.A. Contract 3,626,060 3,626,060 ‐                 927,643 25.58% 927,546 0.01% 2200 Fire Protection Total 3,666,860 3,666,860 ‐                 927,643 25.30% 927,546 0.01% 2230 Ambulance Services608190 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 100 100 4.00%                 ‐ 1,286 92.22%2230 Ambulance Services Total 2,500 2,500 100 100 4.00%                 ‐ 1,286 92.22% 2400 Animal Control Services
608170 Animal Control Services 191,390 191,390 ‐                 46,305 24.19% 90,405               ‐95.24% 2400 Animal Control Services Total 191,390 191,390 ‐                 46,305 24.19% 90,405               ‐95.24% 2500 Public Safety‐Other501110 Salaries‐Regular 58,390 58,390 4,059 25,113 43.01% 19,755 27.12% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** 4,445 ‐100.00% % Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 9 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
2500 Public Safety‐Other, Continued502100 Retirement Charges 11,765 11,765 979 4,946 42.04%                 ‐ 5,034 1.75% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 945 945 80 405 42.86% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 705 705 34 158 22.41% 224 ‐29.46% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,100 2,100 175 875 41.67% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 105 105 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
502120 Medicare/FICA 785 785 61 310 39.49% 363 ‐14.60%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 375 375 36 180 48.00% 74 58.89% 602100 Special Department Expense ‐ ‐ 100 100 ** ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,200 1,200 145 225 18.75% 771 ‐70.82% 602115 Postage 250 250 ‐ 1 0.40% 101 ‐99.01%
602135 Safety Equipment ‐ ‐ ‐                 436 ** ‐ 100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies ‐ ‐ ‐                 64 ** ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 700 700 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
608100 Contractual Services 4,680 4,680 ‐                 4,678 99.96% ‐ 100.00%612115 Liability Insurance Charge 28,175 28,175 ‐                 23,223 82.42% 27,884               ‐20.07% 2500 Public Safety‐Other Total 110,175 110,175 5,669 60,714 55.11% 58,651 3.52% 4300 Parking Control501110 Salaries‐Regular 142,590 142,590 10,455 54,442 38.18% 54,017 0.79% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 33 ** ‐ 100.00%
501120 Salaries‐Part Time 12,350 12,350 1,101 5,259 42.58% 4,974 5.73% 502100 Retirement 36,055 36,055 3,159 16,279 45.15% 15,545 4.72% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,735 2,735 229 1,182 43.22% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 14,050 14,050 1,076 4,921 35.02% 4,660 5.60% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,140 4,140 320 1,700 41.06% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 705 705 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
502120 Medicare/FICA 2,220 2,220 170 882 39.73% 869 1.50% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,445 1,445 93.000 482 33.36% 99 79.46% 602110 Office Expense 6,500 6,500 ‐ 5,302 81.57% 102 98.08% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 10 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
4300 Parking Control, Continued
602115 Postage 500 500 23 107 21.40% 70 34.58%
602130 Clothing 4,500 4,500 ‐ 129 2.87% ‐ 100.00%
604100 Communications 1,000 1,000 55 145 14.50% 327 ‐125.52% 608105 Professional Services 15,000 15,000 1,980 6,563 43.75%                 ‐ 7,204 9.77% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 7,100 7,100 592 2,958 41.66% 1,498 49.36%4300 Parking Control Total 250,890 250,890 19,253 100,384 40.01% 89,365 12.33%6200 Code Enforcement501110 Salaries‐Regular 330,660 330,660 24,343 124,585 37.68% 118,434 5.19% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 ** ‐ 100.00%
501120 Salaries‐Part Time 12,350 12,350 1,101 5,259 42.58% 4,590 14.58% 502100 Retirement 82,925 82,925 6,856 35,009 42.22% 32,472 7.81% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 6,050 6,050 504.000 2,571 42.50% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 40,430 40,430 3,404 15,752 38.96% 14,475 8.82% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,560 4,560 355 1,875 41.12% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,290 1,290 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/FICA 4,835 4,835 366 1,875 38.78% 1,768 6.05% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 3,010 3,010 215 1,099 36.51% 125 88.63% 602110 Office Expense 1,500 1,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 146 **
602115 Postage 1,000 1,000 12 325 32.50% 425 ‐30.77%602160 Code Enforcement Equipment 8,000 8,000 ‐ 108 1.35% ‐ 100.00% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 604100 Communications 800 800 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 624 ‐100.00%
607100 Membership/Dues 800 800 380 380 47.50% ‐ **
607105 Mileage Reimbursement 100 100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,500 1,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 250 250 25.00% ‐ **608100 Contractual Services 4,000 4,000 315 1,260 31.50% 1,260 0.00% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 11 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
6200 Code Enforcement, Continued
608105 Professional Services 5,000 5,000 411 1,388 27.76% ‐ 100.00% 608180 Prosecution/Code Enforcement ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** 4,944 ‐100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 9,060 9,060 755 3,775 41.67% 2,325 38.41%6200 Code Enforcement Total 519,870 519,870 39,267 195,525 37.61% 181,588 7.68% 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 13,446,535 $ 13,499,331 $ 780,110 $ 4,951,446 36.68% 3,491,833 $ 41.80% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)
2100 Law Enforcement
608160 O.C.S.D. Contract 3,498,000 3,498,000 305,608 1,480,849 42.33% 2,578,234 ‐42.56% 2100 Law Enforcement Total 3,498,000 3,498,000 305,608 1,480,849 42.33% 2,578,234 ‐42.56% 2200 Fire Protection608185 O.C.F.A. Contract 1,500,000 1,500,000 ‐                 355,744 23.72% 299,719 18.69% 2200 Fire Protection Total 1,500,000 1,500,000 ‐                 355,744 23.72% 299,719 18.69% 102 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TOTAL 4,998,000 $ $ 4,998,000 $ 305,608 $ 1,836,593 36.75% 2,877,953 $ ‐36.18% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $ 18,444,535 $ 18,497,331 $ 1,085,718 $ 6,788,039 36.70% 6,369,78 $ 6 6.57% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 12 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund3000 Public Works Administration
501110 Salaries‐Regular 318,785 $ $ 329,551 $ 24,145 $ 99,865 30.30% 108,303 $ ‐7.79% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 16,710 16,710 1,016 6,007 35.95% 5,561 8.02% 502100 Retirement Charges 68,410 70,924 5,833 24,148 34.05% 24,863 ‐2.88% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,820 6,037 498 2,096 34.72% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 50,580 50,720 2,417 10,793 21.28% 15,549 ‐30.59% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 600 600 550 1,750 291.67% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,200 1,200 ‐ 224 18.67% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 4,575 4,732 367 1,533 32.40% 1,646 ‐6.87%502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,680 2,779 213 882 31.74% 134 84.81% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings ‐ ‐ ‐ 21 ** ‐ 100.00% 608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ 160 16,480 ** ‐ 100.00%
612115 Liability Insurance Charge 38,215 38,215 ‐                 31,499 82.43% 45,926 ‐45.80% 3000 Public Works Administration Total 507,575 521,468 35,199 195,298 37.45% 201,982 ‐3.31% 3100 Engineering501110 Salaries‐Regular 39,040 51,285 ‐                 12,422 24.22% 19,341 ‐35.77% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐                  ** 267 ‐100.00% 502100 Retirement 8,525 11,430 ‐                 2,312 20.23% 4,393 ‐47.37% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 715 965 ‐ 246 25.49% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 8,920 11,910 ‐                 666 5.59% 4,414 ‐84.91% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 135 195 ‐ ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 502120 Medicare/FICA 565 745 ‐ 177 23.76% 266 ‐50.28%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 360 480 ‐ 109 22.71% 10 90.83% 602110 Office Expense 2,100 2,100 ‐ 53 2.52% ‐ 100.00%
602115 Postage ‐ ‐ 4 13 ** 317 ‐95.90%
602140 Materials & Supplies 2,500 2,500 44 459 18.36% 281 63.35% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,850 1,850 ‐ 900 48.65% 115 87.22% % Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 13 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
3100 Engineering, Continued607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,300 1,300 ‐                 ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐                  0.00% ‐ **608110 Engineering Services 44,400 47,650 ‐                 15,987 33.55% 22,829 ‐29.97% 608120 Plan Checking Services 33,300 33,300 ‐                 766 2.30% 10,326 ‐92.58% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 680 680 57 283 41.62% 288 ‐1.77% 3100 Engineering Total 145,390 167,390 105 34,393 20.55% 62,847 ‐45.28% 3200 Public Facilities501110 Salaries‐Regular 21,950 21,950 5,442 23,607 107.55% 9,184 157.04% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 300 300 183 418 139.33% 74 82.30% 502100 Retirement 5,185 5,185 1,267 5,506 106.19% 2,088 163.70% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 425 425 108 467 109.88% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 4,820 4,820 768 2,940 61.00% 1,660 77.11% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 150 150 ‐ 34 22.67% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 305 305 81 348 114.10% 134 159.70% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 200 200 48 208 104.00% 5 4060.00% 602100 Special Dept Expense 7,885 7,885 ‐ 27 0.34% 2,367 ‐98.86% 602110 Office Expense 2,100 2,100 ‐ ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 602130 Clothing 3,500 3,500 760 1,891 54.03% 868 117.86% 602135 Safety Equipment 500 500 ‐ ‐                  0.00% 563 ‐100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies 8,000 8,000 ‐ 922 11.53% 2,763 ‐66.63% 603110 Building Maintenance 123,240 123,240 5,113 17,602 14.28% 25,768 ‐31.69% 604100 Communications 35,000 35,000 514 1,860 5.31% 1,209 53.85% 604105 Utilities 140,000 140,000 15,749 62,131 44.38% 54,250 12.68% 608100 Contractual Services 65,000 65,000 6,204 24,433 37.59% 17,650 38.43%611110 O.C. Sanitation District User Fee 14,120 14,120 13,985 13,985 99.04% ‐ 100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 3,660 3,660 305 1,525 41.67% 1,546 ‐1.38% 3200 Public Facilities Total 436,340 436,340 50,527 157,904 36.19% 120,129 31.45% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 14 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
3300 Crossing Guard
608175 Crossing Guard Services 43,165 43,165 6,073 11,413 26.44% ‐ 100.00% 3300 Crossing Guard Total 43,165 43,165 6,073 11,413 26.44% ‐ 100.00%3400 Parks Maintenance 501110 Salaries‐Regular 75,595 75,595 6,116 29,642 39.21% 23,650 25.34% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 2,500 2,500 96 1,373 54.92% 983 39.67% 502100 Retirement 15,705 15,705 1,429 6,892 43.88% 5,337 29.14% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,320 1,320 121 587 44.47% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 11,420 11,420 946 4,769 41.76% 3,479 37.08% 502111 Medicare/FICA 840 840 70 333 39.64% ‐ 100.00%
502115 Unemployment Insurance 405 405 ‐ 30 7.41% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,060 1,060 91 455 42.92% 360 26.39% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 680 680 54 261 38.38% 12 95.40%602100 Special Dept Expense 5,000 5,000 279 309 6.18% 188 64.36%603105 Equipment Maintenance 15,000 15,000 360 7,287 48.58% 7,887 ‐7.61% 604105 Utilities 176,000 176,000 14,461 64,671 36.74% 60,520 6.42% 605100 Land Lease 3,000 33,900 598 3,259 9.61% 5,161 ‐36.85% 608100 Contractual Services 99,700 99,700 6,510 33,730 33.83% 28,514 18.29% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 4,455 4,455 371 1,856 41.66% 1,881 ‐1.33%3400 Parks Maintenance Total 412,680 443,580 31,502 155,454 35.05% 137,972 12.67% 3500 Street Maintenance
501110 Salaries‐Regular 106,230 106,230 5,499 36,362 34.23% 37,562 ‐3.19% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 4,000 4,000 375 2,032 50.80% 1,148 77.00% 502100 Retirement 23,180 23,180 1,278 8,363 36.08% 8,524 ‐1.89% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,930 1,930 109 720 37.31% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 16,000 16,000 1,131 5,676 35.48% 5,401 5.09% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,310 2,310 193 914 39.57% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 615 615 ‐ 45 7.32% ‐ 100.00% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 15 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
3500 Street Maintenance, Continued
502120 Medicare/FICA 1,515 1,515 88 570 37.62% 568 0.35% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 970 970 48 320 32.99% 19 94.06% 602100 Special Dept Expense 3,000 3,000 ‐ ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 602125 Small Tools 4,000 4,000 ‐ ‐                  0.00% 921 ‐100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies 65,000 65,000 1,306 7,663 11.79% 28,640 ‐73.24% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 2,000 2,000 390 999 49.95% ‐ 100.00% 608100 Contractual Services 190,000 190,000 13,225 64,707 34.06% 78,501 ‐17.57% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 18,230 18,230 1,519 7,596 41.67% 4,117 45.80% 710190 Pavement Maintenance 60,000 60,000 ‐                 ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 3500 Street Maintenance Total 498,980 498,980 25,161 135,967 27.25% 165,401 ‐17.80% 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance
608155 Storm Water Monitor Program 115,860 115,860 ‐                 3,796 3.28% 460 725.22% 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance Total 115,860 115,860 ‐                 3,796 3.28% 460 725.22% 6300 Graffiti Abatement501110 Salaries‐Regular 38,570 38,570 514 2,444 6.34% 14,530 ‐494.52% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 8,000 8,000 280 719 8.99% 204 71.63% 502100 Retirement Charges 8,935 8,935 113 553 6.19% 3,299 ‐496.56% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 735 735 10 48 6.53% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 8,215 8,215 156 597 7.27% 2,627 ‐340.03% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 255 255 ‐ 7 2.75% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 540 540 11 46 8.52% 213 ‐363.04%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 350 350 5 22 6.29% 7 68.18% 602140 Materials & Supplies 15,000 15,000 904 5,007 33.38% 2,575 94.45% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 7,500 7,500 ‐ ‐                  0.00% 703 ‐100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 13,800 13,800 1,150 5,750 41.67% 5,827 ‐1.34% 6300 Graffiti Abatement Total 101,900 101,900 3,143 15,193 14.91% 29,985 100.00% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS $ 2,261,890 $ 2,328,683 $ 151,710 $ 709,418 30.46% 718,77 $ 6 ‐1.30% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 16 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund4000 Community Development Administration 501110 Salaries‐Regular 177,760 $ $ 177,760 $ 12,732 $ 63,832 35.91% 28,763 $ 121.92% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime                  ‐                 ‐ 33 126 ** ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement Charges 52,005 52,005 3,062 15,384 29.58% 7,584 102.85% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,280 4,280 252 1,264 29.53% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 17,810 17,810 933 5,309 29.81% 3,122 70.05% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 345 345 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 82 ‐100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,315 2,315 186 910 39.31% 404 125.25% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,145 1,145 112 562 49.08% 14 97.51% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 66 630 63.00% 609 3.45% 602120 Books/Periodicals 1,200 1,200 ‐ 178 14.83% 337 ‐89.33% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,600 1,600 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings ‐ ‐                 ‐ 22 ** ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 1,200 1,200 ‐ 289 24.08% ‐ 100.00%
612115 Liability Insurance Charge 52,965 52,965 ‐ 43,657 82.43% 38,261 12.36% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 234 ‐100.00%
4000 Community Development Administration Total 313,625 313,625 17,376 132,163 42.14% 79,410 66.43% 4100 Planning501110 Salaries‐Regular 207,355 207,355 14,981 86,930 41.92% 99,222 ‐12.39% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 1,200 1,200 ‐ 549 45.75% 726 ‐24.38% 501125 Salaries‐Appointed 9,000 9,000 692 3,808 42.31% 3,063 24.32% 502100 Retirement 65,640 65,640 3,501 19,982 30.44% 21,875 ‐8.65% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,655 5,655 297 1,721 30.43% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 29,995 29,995 2,063 10,197 34.00% 12,124 ‐15.89% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 900 900 ‐ 6 0.67% 464 ‐98.71% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,140 3,140 227 1,321 42.07% 1,470 ‐10.14% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,095 2,095 132 765 36.52% 50 93.46% 602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐                 ‐ 49 ** (99) ‐100.00% Community Development‐Lilley
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 17 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Community Development‐Lilley
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
4100 Planning, Continued
602115 Postage 750 750 198 279 37.20% 409 ‐46.59%
602140 Materials & Supplies 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
607100 Membership/Dues 2,500 2,500 ‐ 721 28.84% 470 34.81% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 8,200 8,200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 155 ‐100.00% 607115 Training 1,550 1,550 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
608100 Contractual Services 4,000 4,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **608105 Professional Services ‐ 261,087 52,000 67,880 26.00% ‐ 100.00% 608135 Microfilming 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 610 610 51 254 41.64% 256 ‐0.79% 4100 Planning Total 344,590 605,677 74,142 194,462 32.11% 140,185 38.72% 4200 Building Regulation501110 Salaries‐Regular 50,370 50,370 3,695 18,372 36.47% 25,652 ‐28.38% 502100 Retirement 14,085 14,085 863 4,293 30.48% 5,813 ‐26.15% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,130 1,130 73.000 364 32.21% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 9,760 9,760 737 3,288 33.69% 3,894 ‐15.56% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐                 31 153 ** ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 300 300 ‐ 104 34.67% 27 285.19% 502120 Medicare/FICA 730 730 54 269 36.85% 363 ‐25.90%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 480 480 33 162 33.75% 13 91.98% 602110 Office Expense 200 200 ‐ 34 17.00% 33 3.03%602115 Postage 700 700 ‐ 6 0.86% 94 ‐93.62% 602120 Books/Periodicals 500 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
607100 Membership/Dues 250 250 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 500 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **608115 Inspection Services 700,000 700,000 ‐ 64,223 9.17% 271,244 ‐76.32% 608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ #DIV/0! ‐ **
608135 Microfilming 2,000 2,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 18 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Community Development‐Lilley
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
4200 Building Regulation, Continued611116 Payment to Other Agencies 2,250 2,250 135 135 6.00% 795 ‐83.02% 4200 Building Regulation Total 784,255 784,255 5,621 91,403 11.65% 307,928 ‐70.32% 4400 Business Relations607100 Membership/Dues 2,000 2,000 570 570 28.50% ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
608100 Contractual Services 2,250 2,250 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **608105 Professional Services 15,000 15,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608145 Information Technology 3,750 3,750 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 150 ‐100.00% 609100 Special Events 12,300 12,300 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
4400 Business Relations 37,800 37,800 570.000 570.000 1.51% 150 280.00% 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 1,480,270 $ 1,741,357 $ 97,709 $ 418,598 24.04% 527,673 $ ‐20.67% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)
4100 Planning608105 Professional Services ‐ 5,310 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 102 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TOTAL $ ‐ $ 5,310 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.00% $ ‐ ** TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $ 1,480,270 $ 1,746,667 $ 97,709 $ 418,598 23.97% 527,673 $ ‐20.67% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 19 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund5000 Public Information Office
501110 Salaries‐Regular 82,975 $ $ 82,975 $ 6,314 $ 30,037 36.20% $ ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement Charges 18,765 18,765 1,476 7,020 37.41% ‐ 100.00%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,575 1,575 125 595 37.78% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 12,445 12,445 977 4,397 35.33% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 375 375 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
502120 Medicare/FICA 1,190 1,190 92 435 36.55% ‐ 100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 775 775 56 264 34.06% ‐ 100.00% 602113 Social Media 2,500 2,500 52 352 14.08% 50 85.80% 607100 Membership/Dues ‐ ‐                  ‐                252 ** ‐ 100.00% 5000 Public Information Office 120,600 120,600 9,092 43,352 35.95% 50 99.88% 5100 Community Services Administration501110 Salaries‐Regular 279,875 279,875 20,119 102,315 36.56% 139,026 ‐26.41%501120 Salaries‐Part Time 1,840 1,840 391 1,461 79.40% 18,097 ‐91.93% 502100 Retirement 65,905 65,905 5,253 26,749 40.59% 34,446 ‐22.35% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,940 4,940 406 2,055 41.60% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 29,000 29,000 2,240 10,337 35.64% 16,317 ‐36.65%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 6,000 6,000 500 2,625 43.75% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 900 900 2.000 2.000 0.22% 9 ‐77.78% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,890 3,890 289 1,471 37.81% 2,242 ‐34.39%502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,245 2,245 177 901 40.13% 330 63.37% 602100 Special Dept Expense 18,950 86,950 352 2,528 2.91% 1,780 42.02% 602110 Office Expense 3,185 3,185 47 530 16.64% 247 114.57% 602115 Postage 500 500 8 33 6.60% 268 ‐712.12%
603110 Building Maintenance 10,485 10,485 225 900 8.58% ‐ 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,160 1,160 ‐                892 76.90% ‐ 100.00%607115 Training 1,500 1,500 120 120 8.00% ‐ 100.00% Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 20 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
5100 Community Services Administration, Continued
609100 Special Events 11,500 14,000 1,341 3,576 25.54% 2,524 29.42% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 7,845 7,845 654 3,269 41.67% 2,833 13.34% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 59,295              ‐                59,295 48,874 82.43% 53,636 ‐9.74% 5100 Community Services Administration Total 509,015 579,515 32,124 208,638 36.00% 271,755 ‐23.23% 5200 Community Center Operations
501110 Salaries‐Regular 34,750 34,750 1,859 10,487 30.18% ‐ 100.00% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime                   ‐                  ‐ 147 164 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 92,150 92,150 1,903 10,063 10.92% ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 14,905 14,905 488 2,772 18.60% ‐ 100.00%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,260 2,260 74 407 18.01% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 6,130 6,130 305 1,563 25.50% ‐ 100.00%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,700 2,700 250 1,125 41.67% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,500 1,500 4 4 0.27% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,855 1,855 60 317 17.09% ‐ 100.00%502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,370 1,370 17 97 7.08% ‐ 100.00% 602100 Special Dept Expense 4,820 4,820 225 2,156 44.73% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐                174 17.40% ‐ 100.00%603110 Building Maintenance 6,695 6,695 429 2,018 30.14% 1,618 24.72% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 395 395 33 165 41.77% 167 ‐1.21% 5200 Community Center Operations 170,530 170,530 5,794 31,512 18.48% 1,785 94.34% 5300 Park Operations501110 Salaries‐Regular 76,300 76,300 5,331 26,922 35.28% 22,874 17.70% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐                  600 1,591 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 102,715 102,715 8,822 40,514 39.44% 27,150 49.22% 502100 Retirement 15,310 15,310 1,246 6,292 41.10% 5,198 21.05%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 3,540 3,540 280 1,335 37.71% ‐ 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 11,275 11,275 785 3,603 31.96% 3,110 15.85%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,000 2,000 50 600 30.00% ‐ 100.00% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 21 of 23 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
5300 Park Operations, Continued
502115 Unemployment Insurance 2,025 2,025 148 479 23.65% 243 97.12% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,545 2,545 215 1,010 39.69% 736 37.23%502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,260 2,260 51 257 11.37% 402 ‐56.42% 602100 Special Dept Expense 5,500 5,500 178 592 10.76% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐                17 1.70% 204 ‐91.67% 5300 Park Operations 224,470 224,470 17,706 83,212 37.07% 59,917 38.88%5400 Senior Citizens Programs 501110 Salaries‐Regular 18,040 18,040 1,171 7,420 41.13% 3,346 121.76% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐                  74 74 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 31,995 31,995 1,454 10,016 31.30% 12,681 ‐21.02%502100 Retirement 3,470 3,470 274 1,734 49.97% 760 128.16% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 880 880 52 345 39.20% ‐ 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 2,890 2,890 189 1,058 36.61% 509 107.86%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 1,050 1,050 100 500 47.62% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 600 600 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
502120 Medicare/FICA 725 725 41 261 36.00% 237 10.13%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 665 665 11 70 10.53% 184 ‐162.86% 609200 Senior Citizen Program 1,200 1,500 200 579 38.60% 45 92.23% 5400 Senior Citizens Programs 61,515 61,815 3,566 22,057 35.68% 17,762 24.18% 5500 Recreation Programs602115 Postage Clearing Account 9,000 9,000 ‐                3,047 33.86% ‐ 100.00% 602150 Recreation Brochure Mailing 23,100 23,100 ‐                7,521 32.56% ‐ 100.00% 608150 Contractual Recreation Program 16,800 16,800 ‐                5,078 30.23% ‐ 100.00% 5500 Recreation Programs 48,900 48,900 ‐                15,646 32.00% ‐ 100.00% 101 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES $ 1,135,030 $ 1,205,830 $ 68,282 $ 404,417 33.54% 351,269 $ 15.13% * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 22 of 23 ends

Acct. No.

Description
% of Budget
101 General Fund1600 Non‐Departmental800250 Transfer to FACT Grant $ 17,100 $ 17,100 $ 1,425 $ 7,125 41.67% $               ‐ 10,313 44.74% 800251 Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 10,565 10,565 1,031 3,039 28.76% 1,600 89.94% 800280 Transfer to SCP Maintenance Fund 41,140 41,140 3,428 17,142 41.67% ‐ 100.00% TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT $ 68,805 $ 68,805 $ 5,884 $ 27,306 39.69% 11,913 $ 129.21% Transfers to Other Funds‐Bannigan
November 2021 General Fund Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 23 of 23 ends

General Fund - Fund Balance Status
Measure GG
Transaction &
General Fund Use Tax Fund
(101) (102) Total
Reserves as of June 30, 2021:

Capital Improvement (A) $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000
Economic Uncertainty (B) 5,217,000 5,217,000
Emergency Disaster Continuity (C) 2,609,000 2,609,000
Equipment and Maintenance (A) 150,000 150,000
Technology Equipment (A) 150,000 150,000
Subtotal 13,126,000 - 13,126,000
Available Fund Balance (unreserved) 7,867,648 363,790 8,231,438 Total Fund Balance (Reserves & Available
Fund Balance) as of June 30, 2021 ** 20,993,648 363,790 21,357,438 Estimated increase (decrease) of fund balance
during Fiscal Year 2021-22 856,870 - 856,870
Total Projected Fund Balance (Reserves &
Available Fund Balance) as of June 30, 2022 $ 363,790 21,850,518 $ 22,214,308 $ Notes:
(A) - Flat amounts per Reserve Policy adopted on June 22, 2021 (City Resolution No. 2021-23). (B) - Amount is equal to 20% of Fiscal Year 2021/22 operating expenditures budgeted in General Fund per Reserve Policy adopted on June 22, 2021 (City Resolution No. 2021-23). (C) - Amount is equal to 10% of Fiscal Year 2021/22 operating expenditures budgeted in General Fund per Reserve Policy adopted on June 22, 2021 (City Resolution No. 2021-23). ** - Preliminary balance pending issuance of City's Fiscal Year 2020/21 audited financial statements.

ATTACHMENT C
Click here to return to the agenda
Account
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year

REVENUES
435100 Interest $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ ‐ $ 8,025 5.35% $               ‐ 34,426 328.98% 435110 Unrealized Gains/Losses ‐                 ‐  (2,293) (23,530) ** 3,880 116.49%436140 Tina Way/Pacific Ave. Property Rent 500,000 500,000 1,410 140,387 28.08% 115,072 22.00% 437135 Expense Reimbursement 2,000 2,000 ‐                 ‐  0.00%   ‐ 1,171 100.00% 437145 Sale Of Assets ‐                 ‐  ‐  606,902 ** ‐  100.00% TOTAL REVENUES $ 652,000 $ 652,000 $ (883) $ 731,784 112.24% $ 154,549 373.50% ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USESSalaries and Benefits 501110 Salaries‐Regular 259,540 142,985 9,682 50,664 35.43%                   ‐ 67,448 24.88% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 5,000 ‐  33 204 ** 120 41.18%501120 Salaries‐Part‐Time 2,230 2,230 178 905 40.58% 872 3.78% 502100 Retirement 71,340 46,200 2,526 13,115 28.39%                   ‐ 15,324 14.42% 502105 Workers' Compensation 4,500 2,390 195 1,021 42.72% ‐  100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 36,455 16,770 1,080 5,173 30.85%   ‐ 7,218 28.33% 502111 Medical in Lieu 480 480 60 300 62.50% ‐ 100.00%
502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,035 435 ‐                 ‐  0.00%   ‐ 532 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,675 1,985 135 703 35.42%   ‐ 943 34.14% 502130 Other Benefits 2,205 1,125 85 446 39.64% 46 89.69% 608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐  ‐                 ‐  **   ‐ 1,257 100.00% Total‐Salaries and Benefits 386,460 214,600 13,974 72,531 33.80%                   ‐ 93,760 22.64% Maintenance and Operations
602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐                 147 14.70% ‐  100.00% 602115 Postage 500 500 ‐ 14 2.80%   ‐ 208 93.27%
602140 Materials and Supplies 5,000 5,000 346 356 7.12% ‐  100.00%602145 Gas/Oil/Lube ‐                 ‐  ‐                 20 ** ‐  100.00% 603120 Minor Repairs 15,000 15,000 ‐                 ‐  0.00%   ‐ 1,186 100.00% 604105 Utilities 50,000 50,000 6,055 17,435 34.87% 17,230 1.18%607100 Membership Dues 5,300 5,300 ‐                 ‐  0.00%   ‐ 4,630 100.00% HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
November 2021 Revenues and Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22

ATTACHMENT D

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda
Account
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
November
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
November 2021 Revenues and Expenditures (42% of year)
FY 2021/22
Maintenance and Operations , Continued
607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,000 1,000 ‐                 ‐  0.00% ‐  ** 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐                 ‐  0.00% ‐  ** 608100 Contractual Services ‐ 2,457,940 728 311,035 12.65% 607,712 ‐95.38% 608105 Professional Services 437,000 410,000 18,638 67,688 16.51% 44,025 34.96%610135 Relocation Assistance 40,000 40,000 1,466 11,181 27.95%                   ‐ 70,832 533.50% 610230 Navigation Center (North SPA) 30,000 30,000 ‐                 ‐  0.00% ‐  ** 611110 O.C. Sanitation User Fee 21,400 21,400 20,837 20,837 97.37% ‐  ** Total‐Maintenance and Operations 608,700 3,039,640 48,070 428,713 14.10% 745,823 ‐42.52% Allocated Charges
612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 10,075 10,075 840 4,198 41.67% 1,279 69.53% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 16,190 16,190 ‐                 13,345 82.43% ‐  100.00% 612140 Information Technology Charge 24,075 24,075 2,006 10,031 41.67% 7,379 26.44%614205 Admin Overhead 40,100 20,850 1,515 8,084 38.77%                   ‐ 11,579 30.18% Total‐Allocated Charges 90,440 71,190 4,361 35,658 50.09% 20,237 76.20% Capital Outlay
760100 Demolition/Condemnation ‐                 ‐  ‐                 ‐  **   ‐ 227 100.00% 790100 Land Acquisition ‐                 ‐  ‐                 ‐  ** 1,961,438 ‐100.00% Total‐Capital Outlay ‐                 ‐  ‐                 ‐  ** 1,961,665 ‐100.00% Transfers to Other Funds
800101 Transfer to General Fund ‐ 890,000 ‐                 890,000 100.00% ‐  100.00% Total‐Transfers to Other Funds ‐ 890,000 ‐                 890,000 100.00% ‐  100.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,085,600 $ 4,215,430 $ 66,405 $ 1,426,902 33.85% 2,821,485 $ ‐49.43% REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES $ (433,600) $ (3,563,430) $ (67,288) $ (695,118) $ (2,666,936) * = Actual data is reported through November.

ATTACHMENT D

Page 2 of 2 ends

Housing Authority Fund (Fund 285) - Fund Balance Status Available Fund Balance as of June 30, 2021 ** 10,576,841 $ Estimated increase (decrease) of fund balance
during Fiscal Year 2021-22 (418,640)
Projected Available Fund Balance as of June 30, 2022 $ 10,158,201 ** - Preliminary balance pending issuance of the City's Fiscal Year 2020/21 audited financial statements.

ATTACHMENT E
Click here to return to the agenda
Task Code Description
Adopted Budget
2021/22
FY 2020/21
Budget
Carryover
Amended
Budget
2021/22
YTD
Actual
2021/22 Encumbrances
% Spent
(Includes
Encumbrances)
Remaining
Budget
Street Projects
2021‐105 Traffic Signal Improvements ‐ Fiscal Year 2020/21 $ ‐ $ 200,740 $ 200,740 $ ‐ $ 109,784 54.7% $ 90,956 2022‐101 Citywide Street Rehabilitation ‐ Fiscal Year 2021/22 2,075,000 49,253 2,124,253 26,844 32,909 2.8% $ 2,064,500 2022‐102 Citywide Street Sign Replacement 150,000 ‐  150,000 513 ‐  0.3% 149,487 Total Street Projects $ 2,225,000 $ 249,993 $ 2,474,993 $ 27,357 $ 142,693 6.9% 2,304,943 $ Parks Projects
2021‐201 Park Master Plan $ ‐ $ 100,870 $ 100,870 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% $ 100,870 2021‐202 Hollenbeck Rubber Replacement ‐ 200,735 200,735 ‐  ‐  0.0% 200,735 2021‐203 Premier Park Play Equipment and Rubber ‐ 200,735 200,735 ‐  ‐  0.0% 200,7352021‐204 Harry Dotson Rubber ‐ 70,510 70,510 ‐  ‐  0.0% 70,510 2021‐205 Dog Park (design) 50,000 ‐  50,000 ‐  ‐  0.0% 50,000 2022‐201 Family Resource Center Improvements 425,000 ‐  425,000 ‐  ‐  0.0% 425,000 2022‐202 Rehabilitate Building at Dotson Park 141,000 ‐  141,000 ‐  ‐  0.0% 141,000 Total Parks Projects $ 616,000 $ 572,850 $ 1,188,850 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% 1,188,850 $ Sewer
2022‐301 Sewer Master Plan Update $ 500,000 ‐ $ 500,000 ‐  ‐  0.0% $ 500,000 Total Sewer $ 500,000 $ ‐ $ 500,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% $ 500,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,341,000 $ 822,843 $ 4,163,843 $ 27,357 $ 142,693 4.1% 3,993,793 $ Funding Source
211 Gas Tax Fund 381,431 $            ‐ $ $ 381,431 $ 513 $ ‐ 0.1% $ 380,918 215 Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) (SB‐1) 1,060,640 49,253 1,109,893 26,844 32,909 5.4% 1,050,140 220 Measure M Turnback Fund 750,000 174,740 924,740 ‐  83,784 9.1% 840,956222 CDBG Grant Fund 350,000 ‐  350,000 ‐  ‐  0.0% 350,000 262 Traffic Signal Impact Fees Fund ‐ 26,000 26,000 ‐  26,000 100.0% ‐ 263 Community Center Impact Fees Fund 141,000 ‐  141,000 ‐  ‐  0.0% 141,000 305 Capital Projects Fund (Reserves) 32,929 ‐  32,929 ‐  ‐  0.0% 32,929 310 Park In‐Lieu Fund 125,000 572,850 697,850 ‐  ‐  0.0% 697,850 501 Sewer Maintenance Fund 500,000 ‐  500,000 ‐  ‐  0.0% 500,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,341,000 $ 822,843 $ 4,163,843 $ 27,357 $ 142,693 4.1% 3,993,793 $

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2021/22

STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
JULY 1, 2021 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2021
ATTACHMENT F Click here to return to the agenda

CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
DATE: January 11, 2022
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 18107
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The final tract map for the development of seventeen (17) three-story attached condominium units for the property located at 11752 Beach Boulevard has been submitted by the developer for final certification and recordation.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that the approval of Final Tract Map No. 18107 is a ministerial action that is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15268 (which specifically exempts ministerial actions, including the approval of final subdivision maps); and

2. Approve Final Tract Map No. 18107 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 2022- 03, entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 18107, FOR
CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TO SUBDIVIDE A 0.92 ACRE PARCEL
LOCATED AT 11752 BEACH BOULEVARD”; and

3. Direct the City Engineer to approve any further technical edits necessary to allow for County Surveyor approval and for recordation of the map with the County Recorder of Orange County, and if necessary, to require a revised Final Tract Map with a revised City Engineer’s certificate on the face of Tract Map for endorsement by the current City Engineer; and

4. Direct the City Engineer to collect any security instruments required by the Stanton Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act to guarantee construction of private and public improvements prior to the City Clerk endorsing the City Clerk’s certificate on the face of the Final Tract Map; and
Item: 9G
Click here to return to the agenda

5. Direct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the Final Tract Map the certificate which embodies the approval of said map, and submit the map to the County Recorder of Orange County for recording.

BACKGROUND:

On March 26, 2019, the City Council approved Precise Plan of Development (PPD-787) for development of 17 three-story condominium units, with a private driveway, and common open space amenities located at 11752 Beach Blvd. In conjunction with approving PPD-787, the City Council also approved Tentative Tract Map No. 17-01 to subdivide the 11752 Beach Blvd. parcel for condominium purposes.

In March 2021, the developer provided a Mylar of the Final Tract Map with the owner’s signature and the land surveyor’s signature. In April 2021, the former City Engineer endorsed the Final Tract Map. Rather than require the developer to provide a new Final Tract Map with a new City Engineer’s endorsement statement which would require new owner and surveyor’s signatures and a new notary acknowledgment, City staff is opting to process the existing Mylar copy of the Final Tract Map provided, unless subsequent technical revisions are necessary after Council approval of the Final Tract Map.

ANALYSIS AND JUSTIFICATION:

In accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section 19.26.040, the City Engineer reviewed Final Tract Map No. 18107 and found it to be technically correct and in substantial conformance with Tentative Tract Map. No. 17-01 and all of the conditions of approval imposed thereon. Orange County Public Works has also reviewed and approved Tract Map No. 18107, and has certified to the technical correctness and its compliance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Consequently, staff is recommending that the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 18107 by adopting Resolution No. 2022-03 (Attachment 1).

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

Approving Final Tract Map No. 18107 is a ministerial action that is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15268. Section 15268 specifically exempts ministerial actions, including the approval of final subdivision maps.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notification provided through the regular agenda process.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:
5 - Provide a high quality of life.

Prepared by: Approved by:
/s/ Joe Ames /s/ Jarad L. Hildenbrand
_________________ ________________
Joe Ames, P.E. Jarad L. Hildenbrand
Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Manager
Attachments:

A. Resolution No. 2022-03
B. Final Tract Map No. 18107
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-03

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 18107, FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TO SUBDIVIDE A 0.92 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 11752 BEACH

BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2019, the City Council approved Precise Plan of Development (PPD-787) for development of 17 three-story condominium units, with a private driveway, and common open space amenities located at 11752 Beach Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with approving PPD-787, the City Council also approved Tentative Tract Map No. 17-01 to subdivide the 11752 Beach Boulevard parcel for condominium purposes; and
WHEREAS, Final Tract Map No. 18107 has been submitted to the City by the project applicant; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer and personnel from Orange County Public Works have reviewed Final Tract Map No. 18107 and found it to be technically correct and in substantial conformance with Tentative Tract Map No. 17-01 and all of the conditions of approval imposed thereon.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein and made an operative part of this Resolution.

SECTION 2: The City has determined that the approval of Final Tract Map No.18107 is a ministerial action that is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15268. Section 15268 specifically exempts ministerial actions, including the approval of final subdivision maps. The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Stanton City Hall, 7800 Katella Ave, Stanton, CA 90680. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs staff to file a Notice of Exemption with the Clerk for the County of Orange, California, within five (5) working days following the date of adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 3: The City Council does hereby approve Final Tract Map No. 18107 pursuant to Government Code Sections 66457 and 66458 (Subdivision Map Act) and Section 19.24.050 of the Stanton Municipal Code.

Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-03

Page 2 of 2 ends

SECTION 4: If any provision of this Resolution is held invalid, the remainder of this Resolution shall not be affected by such invalidity, and the provisions of this resolution are severable.

SECTION 5: This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and so note on the Final Map.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 11th day of January, 2022.

DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ATTEST:

I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2022-03 has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the Stanton City Council, held on January 11, 2022, and that the same was adopted, signed and approved by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18107
1 NUMBERED LOT TRACT NO. 18107

ACCEPTED AND FILED

AT THE REQUEST OF

CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
AREA: 40,226 SQ. FT. (GROSS AND NET)
DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2020 IN THE CITY OF STANTON, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DATE ____________ _ BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH 10 ACRES OF LOT 13 OF SECTION 25 TIME _____ FEE$'-------- PER MAP SHOWING RESURVEY OF J.W. BIXBY AND CO'S SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE RANCHO LOS ALAMITOS INSTRUMENT NO. _______ _ AS FILED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 43 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY.

CA ENGINEERING, INC. KENT COOPER, P.L.S. 9322 BOOK _____ PAGE _____ _

HUGH NGUYEN

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER

OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING ALL PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND COVERED BY THIS

MAP, DO HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF SAID MAP, AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.

WE HEREBY RELEASE AND RELINQUISH TO THE CITY OF STANTON:

1. ALL VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS RIGHTS TO BEACH BOULEVARD, EXCEPT AT APPROVED ACCESS LOCATIONS.

TRAN MY HONG-NGUYEN AND THANH VAN NGUYEN, TRUSTEES OF THE TRAN MY HONG-NGUYEN AND THANH VAN NGUYEN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED AUGUST 6, 2014.

TRAN MY HONG-NGUYEN, TRUSTEE THANH VAN NGUYEN, TRUSTEE

THANH PHAT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: _____________ _ BY: _____________ _
PRINT NAME: __________ _ PRINT NAME: __________ _
TITLE: ____________ _ TITLE: ____________ _

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF

THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF _____ _
)
)
ON ________ , BEFORE ME, ----------------�
A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED _________________ _

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE

NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT

HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY

HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL

MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IS IN _______ COUNTY.

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ___ _
(PRINTED NAME)
COMMISSION NUMBER ____ _

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF

THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF _____ _
)
)
ON ________ , BEFORE ME, ----------------�
A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED _________________ _

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE

NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT

HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY

HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL

MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IS IN _______ COUNTY.

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ___ _
(PRINTED NAME)
COMMISSION NUMBER ____ _
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS:

PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436 (a)(3)(A)&(C) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES HAVE BEEN OMITTED:

R.G. WEST AND NELLIE M. WEST, HUSBAND AND WIFE, HOLDERS OF AN EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES FOR DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION PURPOSES AND MINERAL RIGHTS PER DOCUMENT RECORDED 1-22-1953, IN BOOK 2441, PAGE 46, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

THOMAS F. IVEY AND CECILE M. IVEY, HUSBAND AND WIFE, HOLDERS OF A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES PER DOCUMENT RECORDED 6-26-1959, IN BOOK 4774, PAGE 460, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

BY: _________ _
DEPUTY

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN

CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF THANH PHAT, LLC, IN APRIL, 2020. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE

CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN SUCH POSITIONS WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS; AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.

KENT COOPER, P.L.S. 9322
LICENSE EXPIRES 3-31-21

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
DATE
l LA
a::: KENT COOPER o
a.. :;:o
*
EXP. MAR. 31, 2021 *
NO. 9322

I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY IN CONFORMANCE

WITH THE TENTATIVE MAP, AS FILED WITH, AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF STANTON PLANNING COMMISSION; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND CITY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

DATED THIS __ _ DAY OF _______ , 2021.

HAROLD ALLAN RIGG, R.C.E. NO. 49632, EXPIRES 9/30/22

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF STANTON

CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

CITY OF STANTON )

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PRESENTED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE __ DAY OF-----� 2021, AND THAT THEREUPON

SAID COUNCIL DID, BY AN ORDER DULY PASSED AND ENTERED, APPROVE SAID MAP, AND DID ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC, SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENTS; THE DEDICATION FOR STREET PURPOSES OF:

AND DID ALSO ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF STANTON:

1. THE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS RIGHTS TO BEACH BOULEVARD, AS RELEASED AND RELINQUISHED.

AND DID ALSO APPROVE SUBJECT MAP PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(a)(3)(A) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.

DATED THIS ___ DAY OF ______ _ 2021.

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ
BY: ______________ _
DEPUTY

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF STANTON

COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT

I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND THAT ALL MAPPING PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND I AM SATISFIED SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.

DATED THIS __ _ DAY OF _______ , 2021.

KEVIN R. HILLS, COUNTY SURVEYOR, L.S. 6617, EXPIRES 12/31/21 BY: LILY M. N. SANDBERG, DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR
P.L.S. 8402, EXPIRES 6/30/22

COUNTY TREASURER - TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF MY OFFICE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE LAND

COVERED BY THIS MAP OR ANY PART THEREOF FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR

SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOT YET PAYABLE.

AND DO CERTIFY TO THE RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT

HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH REGARDING DEPOSITS TO SECURE PAYMENT OF TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES ON THE LAND COVERED BY THIS MAP.

DATED THIS ___ DAY OF _______ , 2021.

SHARI L. FREIDENRICH BY:

COUNTY TREASURER - TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY TREASURER - TAX COLLECTOR Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18107
1 NUMBERED LOT
AREA: 40,226 SQ. FT. (GROSS AND NET)
DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2020
TRACT NO. 18107

IN THE CITY OF STANTON, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CA ENGINEERING, INC. KENT COOPER, P.L.S. 9322

FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
SURVEYOR'S BOUNDARY NOTE MONUMENT NOTES:

THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING VISIBLE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY LINE (DISTINCTIVE BORDER) OF THIS MAP AS ESTABLISHED HEREON. e INDICATES MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED.
,A. INDICATES FOUND O.C.S. G.P.S. HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION MONUMENT PER RECORDS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR.

BASIS OF BEARINGS [IJ N 2234919.34; E 6032108.87
O.C.S. G.P.S. POINT NO. 3625R1
THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING BETWEEN O.C.S.

HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATIONS GPS NO. 3625R1 AND GPS NO. 3614R1, BEING N00'24'12"E PER RECORDS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR.

FD. 3" BRASS DISK STAMPED "STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RCE 26087", IN WELL MON., DOWN 0.8', PER R2. ACCEPTED AS THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CHAPMAN AVE. AND BEACH BL VD.

DATUM STATEMENT
[I] N 2237565.00; E 6032127.49
O.C.S. G.P.S. POINT NO. 3614R1

THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE VI, NAD 1983 (2017.50 EPOCH O.C.S. GPS ADJUSTMENT).

FD. 3" BRASS DISK STAMPED "STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RCE 26087", IN WELL MON., DOWN 0.8', PER R2. ACCEPTED AS THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF ORANGEWOOD AVE. AND BEACH BLVD.

ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TO OBTAIN

GRID DISTANCES, MULTIPLY GROUND DISTANCES BY A MEAN COMBINATION FACTOR OF

0. 99998841.

QJ FD. LEAD AND TAG, "RCE 12311" IN TOP OF CURB. ACCEPTED POINT ON N'LY LINE OF LOT 16, SEC. 26, R.S.B. 2/43, PER R2.
[I] FD. 1" 1.P., NO TAG, FLUSH. NO REF. ACCEPTED AS 1" I.P. TAGGED "LS 3419" AND N.E.

RECORD REFERENCES
CORNER OF PARCEL 1 PER P.M.B. 92/7-8 AND POINT ON N'L Y LINE OF LOT 13, SEC. 25, R.S.B. 2/43. SET TAG, "LS 9322".

R1 INDICATES RECORD DATA OR CALCULATED FROM RECORD PER TRACT NO. 16283, M.M. 837 /37-38.
[[] FD. 1" 1.P., NO TAG, FLUSH. NO REF. ACCEPTED AS 1" I.P. AND TAG PER R2. ACCEPTED AS N.W. CORNER, OF PARCEL 1 PER P.M.B. 92/7-8 AND POINT ON N'L Y LINE OF LOT 13, SEC. 25, R.S.B. 2/43. SET TAG, "LS 9322".

R2 INDICATES RECORD DATA OR CALCULATED FROM RECORD PER PARCEL MAP NO. 2004-250, P.M.B. 356/40-41. []J FD. SPIKE AND WASHER, NO STAMP, PER R2, FLUSH. SPIKE IS BENT; HELD BASE. ACCEPTED AS THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF BEVER PLACE AND BEACH BLVD.

R3 INDICATES RECORD DATA OR CALCULATED FROM RECORD PER PARCEL MAP NO. 93-130, P.M.B. 290/10-11. [I] FD. SPIKE AND WASHER, "LS 5411", FLUSH, PER CORNER RECORD 2014-1377. ACCEPTED AS POINT ON CENTERLINE OF BEVER PLACE PER R1.

R4 INDICATES RECORD DATA OR CALCULATED FROM RECORD PER PARCEL MAP, P.M.B. 33/37. [[] FD. SPIKE AND WASHER, "LS 5411 ", FLUSH, AT CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF BEVER PLACE AND SUMMERGLEN CIRCLE PER CORNER RECORD 2014-1376.

EASEMENT NOTES:
[[] FD. NAIL AND TAG, "LS 2348" ON PROPERTY LINE PER R1, FLUSH. [IQ] FD. 1" 1.P. AND TAG, "LS 5025" AT LOT CORNER PER R1, FLUSH.

AN EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES FOR DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF R.G. WEST AND NELLIE M. WEST, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED 1-22-1953, IN BOOK 2441, PAGE 46, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (NOT PLOTTABLE FROM

RECORD)
ITI] FD. 1" 1.P. AND TAG, "LS 5025", FLUSH. NO REF. ACCEPTED AS INTERSECTION OF CENTERLINE OF SUMMERGLEN CIRCLE AND N'L Y LINE OF TRACT NO. 16283, M.M. 837 /37-38, FLUSH. [Ill FD. NAIL AND TAG, "RCE 18752", FLUSH. NO REF. ACCEPTED AS POINT ON LINE. (j) A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THOMAS F. IVEY AND CECILE M.

IVEY, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED 6-26-1959, IN BOOK 4774, PAGE 460, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ILl] FD. 2'' I.P., NO TAG, FLUSH. NO REF. NOT ACCEPTED. �187.58' (187.43'R2)
0 c:::
<(
>
_J
0 CD
n lN i--. 0, Lei •
'SI' 0,
<D S'.
�
N
oc:_
De:
o'cl
:::;; I
De:

SCALE: 1 "=50'
0 INDICATES 2" 1.P. AND TAG, "LS 9322", OR 8" SPIKE AND WASHER, "LS 9322", IN ASPHALT HAVING A THICKNESS OF 2'' OR MORE OR LEAD, TACK AND TAG, "LS 9322", OR NAIL AND TAG, "LS 9322", TO BE SET FLUSH, WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS.

SFN INDICATES SEARCHED, FOUND NOTHING.

NTS INDICATES NOT TO SCALE.

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE
-
-�L64.00'
(64.00'R3)
34'
De:
j.,,
N
---
f
-- I 1..&...6
-----+--
N_!_7�s·2rw 13 ��
I POR. LOT 12, SEC. 25
POR. LOT 12, SEC. 25----Y!_:a
�02__ \ I R.S.B. 2/43
RS B 2/43 ----- . . • _ _ :f'--UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY N89'27'oo"w 1146. 70' ---_ OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
SFN: ESTABLISHED
BY INTERSECTION.
959.12' (959.17'R3) --- ___;f __
365.96' (366.00' R1 ,R4) - f 397.35'
CITY OF STANTON 5
_
__;f_ �-
- � 1 . 81 '
( 132.00'R3)
4 'SI' ,w
oc:· N • N � 00'> • o· v
oo
,o, N
0 0
z
ESTABLISHED AS THE N'LY LINE LOT 1
OF LOT 13, SEC. 25, R.S.B. 2/43. 40,226 SQ. FT.

ESTABLISHED PARALLEL WITH THE N'LY LINE
250'
OF LOT 13, SEC. 25, R.S.B. 2/43.
� -------------7 365.96' (366.03'R1) (366.00'R4)
179.94' (179.97'R1) 80.00' M&R1

ESTABLISHED BY
N89"27'oo"w J
( 43o.oo'R3)
INTERSECTION. 5

ESTABLISHED AS THE S'LY LINE
OF THE NORTH 110 FEET OF
THE NORTH 10 ACRES OF LOT
13, SEC. 25, R.S.B. 2/ 43.
1 n
CXJ
N
---(.D
.

SFN: ESTABLISHED
BY INTERSECTION.

De: De:
o'cl o'cl
::;;: ::;;:
0 0
LO LO
,.,.; ,.,.;
,....._ I
De: w <D .....J <D u 0, � 0:::
__, N u
Ll)
CXJ
n
I
r---­
-......._____
n
(79.0
1 .
6 NTS
oc: •
• N
00'>

0. • 0, 00

ESTABLISHED AS THE E'LY LINE
OF THE WEST 396 FEET OF
THE NORTH 10 ACRES OF LOT
13, SEC. 25, R.S.B. 2/ 43.

ESTABLISHED BY
INTERSECTION.

LO
N
(_)
Wl"J
l"J
U)-sc::/-
-N
------
�
I-- Cl'.:!
QU)
__J
• 0:::
0:::
0 LO
N
I
ss::j0
0 N
0 z
. 2
---ss::jI
0 -......._____
ss::j-
(.D
LO
n
. m
. 2
_j .
cj u PARCEL MAP
P.M.B.

NO. 93-130
290/10-11
0 z
I--
u
<(
0:::::
<D z
;:? .....J· 1 w
N (!)
0:::
)-Ll w
0 ::::i!: 0
Ll) :::E
N
(/)
r---­
n
CXJ
0 Q_
. o__
o__
I-- 0
z l

BEVER PLACE
_ -u(i_---337.39' (337.47'R1 ,R2)___ _
N89"26'19"W 450.07' ( 450.04'R1)
AVENUE
City of Stanton | 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 | StantonCA.gov | 1 MEETING DATES 2022
City of Stanton | 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 | StantonCA.gov **City Council Study Sessions: when scheduled, are held on the 3rd Tuesday of the month**

CITY COUNCIL
2nd & 4th Tuesday
6:30 P.M.

PLANNING

COMMISSION
1 st & 3rd Wednesday
6:30 P.M.

PARKS &

RECREATION

COMMISSION
3rd Monday
5:30 P.M.

PUBLIC SAFETY

COMMITTEE
4th Wednesday
(Meets Quarterly)
6:00 P.M.

January 11 January 5 January 17
(Holiday-TBD)
January 26
January 25 January 19
February 8 February 2 February 21
(Holiday-TBD)
April 27
February 22 February 16
March 8 March 2 March 21 July 27
March 22 March 16
April 12 April 6 April 18 October 26
April 26 April 20
May 10 May 4 May 16
May 24 May 18
June 14 June 1 June 20
June 28 June 15
July 12 July 6 July 18
July 26 July 20
- DARK - SUMMER RECESSAugust 3 August 15
August 23 August 17
September 13 September 7 September 19
September 27 September 21
October 11 October 5 October 17
October 25 October 19
November 8 November 2 November 21
November 22 November 16
December 13 December 7 December 19
December 21
Item: 9H
Click here to return to the agenda
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: January 11, 2022
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO NV5 TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL

CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN UPDATED

SEWER MASTER PLAN
REPORT IN BRIEF:

A Sewer Master Plan assesses the needs of the City’s sewer system and plans and prioritizes maintenance and rehabilitation of the system with available funding. An updated sewer master plan is not only a requirement of the City’s Waste Discharge Permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board but is also a useful planning tool for the City’s Capital Improvement Plan. Preparation of the updated Sewer Master Plan will require the services of a highly specialized consulting firm. The previous Sewer Master Plan update was prepared in 2014 by AKM Consulting Engineers. City staff released a “Request for Proposal” (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide an updated Sewer Master Plan to reflect the current condition of the sewer system, to assess the capacity of the existing system to handle flows generated at the ultimate “build-out” of the City, and to develop a comprehensive 10-year Capital Improvement Program with recommended projects. One firm provided a proposal: NV5. City staff believes that NV5 is qualified to update the City’s Sewer Master Plan.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

1. City Council declare this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, Section 15301b; and

2. Award a contract to NV5 to provide an updated Sewer Master Plan and to develop a 10-year comprehensive prioritized Capital Improvement Program with recommended projects for a maximum contract amount of $499,265; and

3. Approve an appropriation of $50,000 from the Sewer Maintenance Fund’s available balance to increase the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget for the Sewer Master Plan project (Task Code No. 2022-301) from $500,000 to $550,000; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and NV5 in a contract to provide the services; and
Item: 9I
Click here to return to the agenda
2 5. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders with NV5, as needed and determined by City staff, up to a total contract amount of $550,000.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Stanton requires the services of a qualified professional to prepare an update to the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The previous Sewer Master Plan update was completed in 2014. The Sanitary Sewer Master Plan needs to be periodically updated as the system ages, construction costs change, development occurs, and regulatory requirements change. The master plan will assess the condition of the system and plan for future improvements necessary to the system. City staff released a “Request for Proposal” (RFP) soliciting proposals to provide an updated Sewer Master Plan and to develop a comprehensive 10-year Capital Improvement Program with recommended projects. The RFP was released in a two-envelope format in accordance with the City’s Purchasing Policy and Procedures. The first envelope consists of a written proposal highlighting the firm’s experience and qualifications, and a separate, sealed envelope contains the fee proposal. The written proposal envelopes are opened, and the enclosed proposals are evaluated by City staff. Once a consensus is reached on the best written proposal, City staff will negotiate a fee with the best qualified consultant. Typically, in the event the City cannot negotiate a fee with the best qualified consultant, the City will negotiate a fee with the second ranked consultant, and so on until an agreement is reached. In this way, contract award is based on best-qualified consultant rather than lowbid.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

A Request for Proposals was released with a due date of December 1, 2021. Six firms were directly solicited to provide a proposal.

One (1) proposal from NV5 was received and reviewed by the Public Works Department.

AKM Consulting Engineers stated they declined to provide a proposal, in part, because AKM’s anticipated fee substantially exceeded the City’s budget for the work due to subconsultant costs.

City staff believes that NV5 is qualified to update the City’s Sewer Master Plan because NV5 has successfully prepared Sewer Master Plans for cities within San Diego County.

The scope of work provided is within the existing $500,000 budget; however, City staff anticipates some additional work may be needed based upon field issues encountered.

Therefore, the recommended actions include a $50,000 contingency request. 3 FISCAL IMPACT:

The Fiscal Year 2021/22 Adopted Budget includes $500,000 for the Sewer Master Plan Update Project (Project No. 2022-301).

The Sewer Maintenance Fund’s available balance is expected to be $5.17 million by June 30, 2022. After approving the $50,000 appropriation requested by staff, the Sewer Maintenance Fund’s available balance will be reduced to $5.12 million by June 30, 2022.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

The action requested in this report is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, Section 15301b, and therefore, categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:
3 – Provide a high-quality infrastructure.

Prepared by: Concurred by:
/s/ Joe Ames /s/ Michelle Bannigan
_________________ ________________
Joe Ames, P.E. Michelle Bannigan
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Finance Director, CPA Approved by:
/s/ Jarad L. Hildenbrand
_________________
Jarad L. Hildenbrand
City Manager
Attachments:

A. Draft Professional Services Agreement
B. Request for Proposal
C. NV5’s Proposal and Fee Proposal
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 1 -

CITY OF STANTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

SEWER MASTER PLAN

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this day of ,
20___, by and between the City of Stanton, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680 (“City”) and NV5, a CORPORATION, with its principal place of business at 163 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 100, IRVINE, CA 92618 (“Consultant”).

City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional SEWER MASTER PLAN consultant services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional SEWER MASTER PLAN consultant services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the SEWER MASTER PLAN project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional SEWER MASTER PLAN consultant services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from January 11, 2022 to June 30, 2023, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 2 -

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractors, Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant shall complete, execute, and submit to City a Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification (IRS FormW-9) prior to commencement of any Services under this Agreement. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement.

Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Cynthia Peraza. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 3 -

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates Joe Ames, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Cynthia Peraza, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its subconsultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 4 -
Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees,agents and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance.

3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.10.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement, the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the Insurance Requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
(a) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as
Insurance Services Office “occurrence” form CG 0001, with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and if written with an aggregate, the aggregate shall be double the per occurrence limit. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions
limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement. (b) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering “Any Auto” (Symbol 1) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 each accident.
(c) Professional Liability: Professional Liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed (for example, any exclusions 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 5 -
relating to lead, asbestos, pollution, testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.).

If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement. (d) Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.

3.2.10.3 Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval.
(a) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section

3.2.10.2 (a) Commercial General Liability and (c) Contractor’s Pollution Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional
insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the
Agreement.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be
restricted to “ongoing operations”; (2) exclude
“contractual liability”; (3) restrict coverage to “sole” liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other
exclusions contrary to the Agreement.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for nonpayment of premium. (b) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section

3.2.10.2 (b) Automobile Liability and (d) Professional Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 6 -
City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for nonpayment of premium. (c) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section

3.2.10.2 (e) Workers’ Compensation shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the indemnified parties.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for nonpayment of premium.

3.2.10.4 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All insurance coverages shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the indemnified parties shall not contribute with this primary insurance.

Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.5 Waiver of Subrogation. Required insurance coverages shall not prohibit Consultant from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss.

Consultant shall waive all subrogation rights against the indemnified parties. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.6 Deductible. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the indemnified parties in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.

3.2.10.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates and endorsements on forms approved by the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

3.2.10.8 Failure to Maintain Coverage. Consultant agrees to suspend and cease all operations hereunder during such period of time as the required insurance coverage is not in effect and evidence of insurance has not been furnished to 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 7 -
the City. The City shall have the right to withhold any payment due Consultant until Consultant has fully complied with the insurance provisions of this Agreement.

In the event that the Consultant’s operations are suspended for failure to maintain required insurance coverage, the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for completion of the Services because of production lost during suspension.

3.2.10.9 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

3.2.10.10Insurance for Subconsultants. All Subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant’s policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing Subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the Subconsultant’s policies.

3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($499,265) (“Total Compensation”) without written approval of City’s Public Works Director. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation.

Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 8 -
the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement.

Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 9 -

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination.

Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant:

NV5
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
Attn: Cynthia Peraza, Project Manager
City:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Attn: Joe Ames, Department of Public Works
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 10 -
embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.

3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services.

Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.5.3.3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information (“Proprietary Information”) unless the City’s legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information. Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant’s objection to the City’s release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City’s choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 11 -

3.5.5 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.6 Indemnification.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.

If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

The obligation to indemnify, as provided herein, shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.

3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 12 -

3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.8 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.9 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.11 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.12 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.13 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.14 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 13 -

3.15 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.16 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.17 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.19 Declaration of Political Contributions. Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, submit to City an annual statement in writing declaring any political contributions of money, in-kind services, or loan made to any member of the City Council within the previous twelve-month period by the Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees, including any employee(s) that Consultant intends to assign to perform the Services described in this Agreement.

3.20 Subcontracting.

3.20.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. [Signatures on following page.]
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 14 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Professional Services Agreement on this ____ day of __________, 202_.

CITY OF STANTON NV5
By:

Jarad Hildenbrand
City Manager
By:

Name: Carmen Kasner
Title: Senior Vice President
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 15 -
By:________________________________
__
Name: MaryJo O’Brien
Title: Secretary
ATTEST:

By:

Patricia Vazquez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
55414.00000\32996936.2
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
As described more particularly in the proposal received:
• Evaluate the hydraulic capacity of the collection system. • Evaluate the condition of the system through the use of new CCTV inspection reports and recordings.
• Verify the accuracy of the existing sewer infrastructure data. • Determine the ownership of all sewer lines and maintenance responsibilities of the City of Stanton.
• Prepare updated Sewer Atlas using GIS software. The selected consultant must provide a copy of the final shape file of the sewers to the City. A copy of the prior Sewer Atlas prepared in 2014 is available online at
(https://www.stantonca.gov/departments/public_works___engineering/request_fo r_proposals_and_bids/index.php).
• Evaluate the remainder of the effective life of components of the system through historical records and past reports.
• Develop a comprehensive, prioritized 10-year Capital Improvement Program with cost estimates of recommended projects.
• Incorporate needs with the current General Plan, available online at (https://www.stantonca.gov/departments/public_works___engineering/request_fo r_proposals_and_bids/index.php)
• Apprise staff of latest Federal, State, and Local Regulations. • Evaluate status of regulatory permits (Waste Discharge Requirements). • Flow monitoring at 9 locations.

OPTIONAL SERVICES at additional cost:
• Scan sewer as-built plans and update GIS layers with reference numbers such that the as-built plans are tied to the GIS layers for plan retrieval in the City’s GeoViewer Program.
• Additional CCTV inspections and recordings.
55414.00000\32996936.2
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
55414.00000\32996936.2
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION
Services to be charged at an hourly rate according to the rates shown below. 55414.00000\32996936.2
C-2
Estimated Distribution of Hours/Expenses
55414.00000
\32996936.2
C-3
55414.00000
\32996936.2
C-4
55414.00000
\32996936.2
C-5
55414.00000
\32996936.2
C-6

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR

SEWER MASTER PLAN
FOR
California
RFP responses to be received until
4:30 P.M., December 1, 2021
In the Office of the Public Works Department
City of Stanton
Public Works and Engineering Department
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
(714) 379-9222 I StantonCA.gov
Approved by:

Joe Ames
Director of Public Works and Engineering
[email protected]
(714) 890-4203
Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND INTRODUCTION ................................... 3 SECTION II. PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 3 SECTION Ill. SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................... 3 SECTION IV. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ........................................ 4 SECTION V. SELECTION CRITERIA ................................................................................... 7 SECTION VI. SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................. 8 SECTION VII. SUBMISSION DEADLINE ........................................................................... 9 SECTION VIII. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ................................. 1 o SECTION IX. TAXES AND LICENSES .............................................................................. 1 o SECTION X. PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT ................................................................... 10 SECTION XI. INSURANCE .................................................................................................. 11 SECTION XII. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY ........................ 12 SECTION XIII. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ............................................................ 12 SECTION XIV. CONTRACT ................................................................................................ 13 SECTION XV. GENERAL CONDITIONS ......................................................................... 13 City of Stanton Public Works Page 12
SECTION I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND INTRODUCTION
The City of Stanton, Public Works / Engineering Department is requesting proposals from qualified professional engineering firms to update the City's Sewer Master Plan.

Proposals must conform to the requirements of this Request for Proposal (RFP), and must be submitted in a sealed envelope, to the Department of Public Works no later than 4:30 p.m., on Wednesday, December 1 st
, 2021. The
City reserves the right to waive any irregularity in any proposal, or to reject any proposal that does not comply with this RFP. The City alone, using criteria determined by the City, will select the qualified firm and/or consultant.

The successful consultant will be required to enter into an agreement with the City, which will include the requirements of this RFP as well as other requirements to be specified at a later date. By submitting a proposal, the consultant agrees to all of the terms of this RFP.

Direct questions to Joe Ames, Director of Public Works/Engineering, 714.890.4203, or via email at: [email protected].

SECTION II. PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of Stanton currently operates and maintains a sewer collection system that serves the city and portions of the adjacent municipalities of Anaheim, Garden Grove and unincorporated Orange County. This network of sanitary sewers serves approximately 40,000 residents is comprised of 55.4 miles of mains with approximately 550 Manholes and 5,000 sewer laterals.

Development continues to increase the population density of the city.

SECTION Ill. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A Sewer Master Plan update was previously prepared in 2014 (available online at:
(https://www.stantonca.gov/departments/public_works_engineering/reque st_for_proposals_and_bids/index.php) by AKM Consulting Engineers.

The City desires to update its Sewer Master Plan to reflect current condition, and to assess the capacity of the existing system to handle flows generated at ultimate "build-out" of the City. As part of this RFP, the City desires that the City of Stanton Public Works Page 13
entire sanitary sewer network be captured on Closed Caption Television {CCTV).

This Master Plan shall:
• Evaluate the hydraulic capacity of the collection system. • Evaluate the condition of the system through the use of new CCTV inspection
reports and recordings.
• Verify the accuracy of the existing sewer infrastructure data. • Determine the ownership of all sewer lines and maintenance responsibilities of the City of Stanton.
• Prepare updated Sewer Atlas using GIS software. The selected consultant must provide a copy of the final shape file of the sewers to the City. A copy of the prior Sewer Atlas prepared in 2014 is available on line at
{https://www.stantonca.gov/departments/public_works_engineering/ request_for_proposals_and_bids/index.php).
• Evaluate the remainder of the effective life of components of the system through historical records and past reports.
• Develop a comprehensive prioritized Capital Improvement Program estimates. Program should include 70-years of recommended projects. • Incorporate needs with the current General Plan, available online online at
{https://www.stantonca.gov/departments/public_works_engineering/ request_for_proposals_and_bids/index.php)
• Apprise staff of latest Federal, State, and Local Regulations. • Evaluate status of regulatory permits (Waste Discharge Requirements).

SECTION IV. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
The Department has established requirements for the proposal format.

Proposals shall be submitted in a sealed envelope. All pages shall be duplex copied. The Consultant's Proposal shall be no more than 35 pages, excluding a cover letter of up to two pages, dividers, matrix, schedule, and certificates.

Proposals failing to provide sufficient information and assurances of performance to accurately assess each category of the required services and failing to comply with requirements and conditions of the RFP will not be given further consideration. The Consultant's Proposal shall include the following:

Four copies of the proposal must be submitted containing the following elements:

City of Stanton Public Works Page 14
l. A cover letter signed by an individual authorized to obligate the Proposer to fulfill the commitments contained in the proposal. The letter must include:
{l) a contact for all communications pertaining to the proposal (including the firm's name, address, name of contact person, contact's e-mail and direct phone number); (2) a statement of the Proposer's understanding of the scope of services to be provided and overall ability and qualifications to conduct the work and provide services as it relates to key points of the RFP.

2. A narrative of the firms structure and history, and form. (corporation, sole proprietorship, etc.), key personnel and structure (organization chart), credentials, background, and ownership of the firm. Include the firm's previous experience with providing on-call Public Works Inspectors.

3. List qualifications of key personnel with resumes and a breakdown of responsibilities. This section shall include the professional and technical experience, background, qualifications and any professional licensing/certifications obtained. Sufficient information shall be provided to evaluate the ability and experience for each inspector to successfully fulfill their roles.

4. A list of at least three (3) government agency references that may be contacted for verification of the respondent's experience and qualifications.

References shall include name and contract information for jurisdiction including full name, title, address, phone number, brief description of project and relevance to the scope described in this Request for Proposal.

5. The proposed fee schedule in a separate sealed envelope. The fee proposal shall be formatted identically to the resource allocation matrix described herein, with rates included.

6. A statement that this RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of the Consultant's Proposal.

7. A statement that this RFP and the Consultant's Proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for this project when said Agreement is fully executed by the Consultant and the Mayor or City Manager of Stanton.

8. A statement that the Consultant's Services to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City's RFP except as otherwise specified in the Consultant's Proposal under the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL."
City of Stanton Public Works Page 15

9. A single and separate section with the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" containing a complete and detailed description of all of the exceptions to the provisions and conditions of this Request for Proposal upon which the Consultant's Proposal is contingent and which shall take precedent over this RFP.

10. A statement of qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the Consultant's Staff to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact. If one or more of the Consultant's staff should become unavailable, the Consultant may substitute other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City.

11. A resource allocation matrix must be submitted with the Proposal. The resource allocation matrix must list detailed tasks in rows and the appropriate individual (Job Title Only) as well as the number of hours that these individuals will be working on each task listed, will be included in adjacent columns. The resource allocation matrix and the project design schedule are required of both the primary consultant, as well as any subconsultant. In addition, (any)applicable support services consultant geotechnical must list the type and number of test, and hours being proposed, as well as the type and number of hours (resource allocation matrix) of su-rvey work within the Proposal. Failure to do so will result in the Consultant's Proposal being deemed incomplete and it will not receive further consideration.

12. The resource allocation matrix shall include in addition to any tasks the Consultant chooses to list shall include but not be limited to the Project Report, Meetings, Traffic Study, Hydrology/Hydraulics Study, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Right-of-Way, As-Built Drawings, etc

13. A statement of sub-consultant's (include relief personnel) qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the sub-consultant's staff to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact.

74. A statement that the Consultant acknowledges and understands that the consultant will not be allowed to change the sub-consultant without written permission from the City.

City of Stanton Public Works Page 16

15. A statement that all charges for Consultant services is a "Not-to-Exceed Fee" which must include conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made a part of said Consultant's Proposal.

16. A statement that the Consultant will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This may include preparation of field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement objectives.

17. A statement that the Consultant will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the construction work.

18. A copy of the Consultant'·s hourly rate schedule and a statement that said hourly rate schedule is part of the Consultant's Proposal for use in invoicing for progress payments and for extra work incurred that is not part of this RFP. An itemized cost breakdown for the work described herein must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope as part of your Proposal submittal.

All extra work will require prior approval from the City. The cost for Title Reports shall show cost per Title Report with an extended cost to aid in determination in the amount of the contract. The City will only pay for the actual amount of the Title Reports obtained.

19. A s_tatement that the Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

20.A statement that all federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to notwithstanding any state or local laws and regulations. In a case of conflict between federal, state or local laws or regulations the strictest shall be adhered to.

27. A statement that the Consultant shall allow all authorized federal, state, county, and City officials access to place of work, books, documents, papers, fiscal, payroll, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this special project. All relevant records shall be retained for at least three years.

SECTION V. SELECTION CRITERIA
The proposals will be evaluated on the following factors, but may not be limited City of Stanton Public Works Page 17
to just these factors:

Staffing Capabilities / Technical Competence
Candidates shall have knowledge of the principles and practices of engineering as related to design, construction and maintenance of streets, sidewalks, drainage and other public facilities, as well as an understanding of the practices, applicable laws and state permits associated with storm water treatment and pollution prevention; the methods and materials used in the testing of construction materials; the laws, codes and standards applicable to public works construction. The inspector must have the ability to make sound decisions and communicate with others and to assimilate and understand information in a manner consistent with the essential job functions.

Past Performance Record
Experience in completion of projects of similar scope for other agencies within Southern California is desirable. Efficiency and timeliness in completion of project requirements.

Approach to Work
Methodology to be implemented to address and coordinate the various elements within the project.

Cost Control
Demonstrated ability to provide innovative and reliable solutions using available City resources.

SECTION VI. SELECTION PROCESS
Selection of the consultant will be made in accordance with the provision of Chapter 10 of the California Government Code, Sections 4526 and 4529.5.

Stating that selection of professional services is made on the basis of competence and qualifications without regard to fee. The fee will be opened and evaluated after selection of the consultant is complete.

Each RFP will be reviewed to determine if it meets the submittal requirements contained within this RFP. Failure to meet the requirements for the RFP will be cause for rejection of the proposal. The City may reject any proposal if it is conditional, incomplete or contains irregularities. The City may waive an immaterial deviation in a proposal, but this shall in no way modify the proposal document or excuse the consultant from compliance with the contract requirements if the consultant is awarded a contract.

City of Stanton Public Works Page 18
The successful consultant to whom work is awarded shall, within ten (70) days after being notified, enter into a contract with the City for the work in accordance with the specifications and shall furnish all required documents necessary to enter into said contract. Failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract within said ten (70) days shall be just cause for the City to contract with the next responsible consultant.

The City may select multiple firms and or consultants to perform on call work based on availability of consultants and need for an inspector.

SECTION VII. SUBMISSION DEADLINE
In order to be considered, the Consultant must submit four copies of responses to the RFP to the following office:

Attention: Joe Ames, P.E., T.E.

Director of Public Works/ City Engineer
City of Stanton
Department of Public Works
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton CA 90680-3162
The proposal must be received at the above office no later than the date listed on the cover.

There is no expressed or implied obligation for City to reimburse firms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request. Materials submitted by respondents are subject to public inspection under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sec. 6250 et seq.). Any language purporting to render the entire proposal confidential or propriety will be ineffective and will be disregarded.

The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted, and to use any idea in a proposal regardless of whether the proposal was selected.

Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in the RFP, unless clearly, and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City and the selected firm.

All property rights, including publication rights of all reports produced by the selected firm in connection with services performed under this agreement City of Stanton Public Works Page 19
shall be vested in the City.

SECTION VIII. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
To receive any written responses to Requests for Information or other addenda issued by the City to be made a part of this Request for Proposal prior to the submittal date please e-mail contact information to: [email protected].

SECTION IX. TAXES AND LICENSES
All taxes and licenses, including, but not limited to, a Stanton City Business License, required for this work shall be obtained at the sole expense of the consultant.

SECTION X. PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT
This work is to be performed for a "Not-to-Exceed Fixed Fee." The Consultant shall provide a "Payment Schedule" indicating the fee for individual tasks with a "Not-to-Exceed Fixed Fee" which shall be the sum of all tasks.

Tasks shall include, but not be limited to, all Professional Consultant Services necessary to complete the work covered by this Proposal.

The City will pay the Consultant for work completed as identified 1n the Payment Schedule.

Progress payments shall be based on tasks performed as identified in the Payment Schedule. Monthly invoices will specifically identify job title, personhours, and costs incurred by each task.

Sub-categorization of task is permitted to better define the task for payment.

Reimbursement costs such as mileage, printing, telephone, photographs, postage and delivery, are to be included in the "Not-to-Exceed Fixed Fee." All tasks including labor and reimbursable costs such as mileage, printing, telephone, photographs, postage, and delivery shall be supporting documentation presented at the time payment is requested.

City of Stanton Public Works Page 110
The City will pay the Consultant for all acceptable services rendered in accordance with the "Agreement for Professional Consultant Services." When the Consultant is performing, or is requested to perform, work beyond the scope of service in the "Agreement for Professional Consultant Services," an amendment to the agreement will be executed between the City and Consultant.

Payment will be based on hourly rate for work completed associated with each applicable task as identified in the consultant's proposal.

SECTION XI. INSURANCE
A. The Consultant shall provide Errors and Omissions Professional Insurance. Such coverage limits shall not be less than $7,000,000 per claim and aggregate.

B. The Consultant shall have Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance in the amounts as follows:

GENERAL LIABILITY
Bodily Injury
Property Damage
$7,000,000 per occurrence
$ 500,000 per occurrence
A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount of $2,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the above minimum limits.

C. The Consultant shall have Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance coverage for owned and non-owned automotive equipment in the amount of not less than $500,000.

D. The selected firm shall furnish the City a certificate evidencing Workmen's Compensation Insurance with limits no less than $7,000,000 per accident and Comprehensive Professional Liability Insurance or General Liability Insurance with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. The City shall be named as the Additional Insured. Certificates of Insurance must be accompanied by the applicable endorsements for the specific insurance policy
E. A Certificate of Insurance or an appropriate binder shall bear an endorsement containing the following provisions:

City of Stanton Public Works Page 111
"Solely as respect to services done by or on behalf of the named insured for the City of Stanton, it is agreed that the City of Stanton, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stanton, its officers, employees and agents are included as additional insured under this general liability policy and the coverage(s) provided shall be primary insurance and not contributing with any other insurance available to the City of Stanton, its officers and employees and agents, under any third party liability policy."
F. It is the consultant's responsibility to ensure that all subconsultants comply with the following: Each subconsultant that encroaches within the City's right-of-way and affects (i.e., damages or impacts) City infrastructure must comply with the liability insurance requirements of the City. Examples of such subconsultant work include soil sample borings, utility potholing, etc.

SECTION XII. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY
The City reserves the right to terminate the "Agreement for Professional Consultant Services" for the "convenience of the City" at any time by giving ten (70) days written notice to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. All finished or unfinished drawings, maps, documents, field notes and other materials produced and procured by the Consultant under the said aforementioned Agreement is, at the option of the City, City property and shall be delivered to the City by the Consultant within ten (70) working days from the date of such termination. The City will reimburse the Consultant for all acceptable work performed as set forth in the executed Agreement.

SECTION XIII. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The Consultant's relationship to the City in the performance of the Consultant's services for this project is that of an independent Contractor.

The personnel performing said Services shall at all times be under the Consultant's exclusive direction and control and shall be employees of the Consultant and not employees of the City. The Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due his employees in connection with the performance of said work shall be responsible for all employee reports and obligations, including but not necessarily restricted to, social security, income tax withholding, unemployment compensation, and Workers' Compensation.

City of Stanton Public Works Page I 12
SECTION XIV. CONTRACT
The Contract includes the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services, Consultant's Proposal, City's Request for Proposal, and Exhibits.

The Political Reform Act and the City's Conflict of Interest Code require that consultants be considered as potential filers of Statements of Economic Interest. Consultants, as defined by Section 18701, may be required to file an Economic Interest Statement (Form 700) within 30 days of signing a Consultant Agreement with the City, on an annual basis thereafter if the contract is still in place, and within 30 days of completion of the contract.

SECTION XV. GENERAL CONDITIONS
Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by the Consultant in: (l) preparing the Proposal; (2) submitting the Proposal to the City; (3) presentation during selection interview; (4) negotiating with the City any matter related to this Proposal; (5) any other expenses incurred by the Consultant prior to an executed Agreement.

The City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by the Consultant.

The Consultant is responsible for notifying Underground Service Alert and providing proper traffic control, at no additional expense to the City.

The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any Agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserve the right to postpone reviewing the Proposal for it's own convenience and to reject any and all Proposals responding to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s).

The City reserve the right to reject any or all Proposal submitted. Any Contract awarded for these Consultant engagements will be made to the Consultant who, in the opinion of the City, is best qualified.

City of Stanton Public Works Page I 13
SEWER MASTER PLAN 2021
December 1st, 2021
Prepared For:

CITY OF STANTON
Department of Public Works
Joe Ames, PE, TE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680-3162
Attachment: C
Click here to return to the agenda
December 1st, 2021
City of Stanton
Department of Public Works
Attn: Joe Ames, PE, TE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680-3162
SUBJECT: City of Stanton Sewer Master Plan 2021
Dear Mr. Ames,
NVS
The City of Stanton (City) has put forth a proposed method to establish a framework for systematically identifying, planning for and implementing the necessary wastewater system improvements to accommodate the ongoing and anticipated population and development growth. The strategy that you have developed is a very smart approach because it starts with accurate data versus relying on historical documentation that may not be complete or accurate. We believe that NV5 is the team for the City to implement this strategy for a number of reasons:

Technical Approach: NV5 has assembled our key team members who bring extensive practical experience with wastewater planning and implementation. Our goal is to help the City prepare and promote a systematic and sustainable approach to efficiently and effectively manage its wastewater assets while implementing economic efficiencies. NV5 has teamed with specialty subconsultants including National Plant Services (System Cleaning and CCTV Inspection}, and West Coast Civil (Hydraulic Model Update) who will apply their experience and expertise to the project.

Understanding of the City: NV5 has been serving the City since 2014. We recently provided the City with an Interim City Engineer, and have previously assisted the City with its FY 2019-20 Sewer Condition Improvements, FY 2019-20 Citywide Street Resurfacing, Beach Boulevard Beautification, Western Avenue Sewer Improvements, and Stanton Central park projects, among many others. This experience means that we understand your goals as a community, allowing us to hit the ground running with this project.

The Right Team: Our team brings extensive experience with each of the components that comprise this project. We bring boots on the ground experience with 20 years of wastewater master planning, rehabilitation and design. Understanding the full cycle from project identification through construction brings a practical approach to understanding the numbers that often need a reality check. Our proposed Project Manager, Cynthia Peraza, PE, has been responsible for developing and updating wastewater master plans, Sewer System Management Plans, Asset Management Plans, and preparing design and rehabilitation programs alongside Carmen Kasner, PE, who has both completed those same types of projects and led efforts as a Technical Advisor and performing Quality Control/ Quality Assurance for these projects to assure they remain on track to success.

Tailored Approach: We at NV5 do not prepare reproductions of master plans by taking the last one we prepared and making some changes. We listen to our clients, dig into your issues and concerns, and develop an approach tailored for your community. Our experience has allowed us to identify opportunities to implement efficient and cost saving methods, which we will bring to your project.

NV5 is looking forward to working collaboratively with the City as it continues to proactively manage its wastewater assets. We are eager to apply our knowledge and experience as the City looks towards its continued growth. NV5 is aware of the City's needs, and more importantly, its expectations with this project.

Coupled with our extensive experience, NV5 is the right team for your project. Thank you for considering our qualifications for this important effort.
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100 I Irvine, CA 92618 I www.NV5.com I Office 949.585.0077 I Fax 949.585.0433 NVS
This proposal is valid for a period of 90 days. NV5 has read and will comply with all terms and conditions of the RFP. If you have any questions about our qualifications or about this proposal, please contact me at 949.585.0477 or [email protected] or our proposed Project Manager, Cynthia Peraza, PE at 949.585.0477 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
NV5, Inc.

Jeff Cooper, PE
Principal in Charge
Cynthia Peraza, PE
Project Manager
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100 I Irvine, CA 92618 I www.NV5.com I Office 949.585.0077 I Fax 949.585.0433 )
)

ABOUT NVS
NV5 is a firm of professionals that direct
their talents and experience into creating
better solutions. Founded in 1949, we
have served both public and private clients
throughout Southern California. Our focus
is on communities and our mission is to
use engineering to improve the quality of
those communities.

Our services are traditional-planning,
surveying, water and wastewater
engineering, construction management
and construction support-but our attitude,
approach, and delivery are unique, and the
result is that we go above and beyond in
a way that provides our clients with better
project outcomes. With a combined staff of
over 500 engineers, surveyors and support
personnel in our 8 Southern California
offices (including Anaheim, Irvine, Long
Beach, Ventura, Palm Desert, Murrieta,
Oceanside, and San Diego), we are
capable of providing high-quality consulting
throughout the area. Some of the services
we commonly provide include:
• Water and
Wastewater
Engineering
• Master Planning
• NPDES Services
• Hydraulic
Modeling
• GIS and CADD
Support Services
• Surveying,
Staking, and
Mapping
• Extension of Staff
for Municipal
Clients
• On-Call Plan
Check &
Inspection
Services
• Site Civil
Engineering
• Flood Control
and Drainage
• Program
Management

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter 01
Firm Introduction 02
Key Staff 03
Understanding and Approach 06
Schedule 16
Resource Allocation Matrix 17
Experience and References 18
Disclosures 19
Resumes 20
Fee Proposal (under separate cover)

LOCAL KNOWLEDGE
Through NV5's previous experience with public agencies
throughout Southern California, we have a thorough understanding of local laws, design criteria, standards and permitting requirements. We have also successfully coordinated many projects involving multiple stakeholders such as utility companies, regulatory and municipal agencies.

SUBCONSULTANTS
• West Coast Civil, 10650 Treena Street, Suite 104, San Diego, CA 92131
• National Plant Services Inc, 1461 Harbor Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90813-2741
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 3
) PROJECT TEAM
NV5 has assembled a
team of highly qualified
professionals to meet
your project needs. Team
members have been selected
based upon their experience
with the anticipated projects,
their knowledge of the
local area, and their ability
to serve the City's needs
for this contract. All team
members are available and
committed to work on this

TEAM MEMBER

EXPERIENCE
Jeff Cooper, PE
Carmen Kasner, PE
Cynthia Peraza, PE
Julian Palacios, PE
James Owens, PE, LEED AP
♦ ♦
♦ ♦
♦ ♦
♦
♦
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
contract-team members Jerome Watts, PE ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
will not be replaced Amy Storey, LEED AP ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
without prior written
notice to the City. The
staff proposed for this contract represent just a sampling of the deep in-house resources available.

The organization chart on the next page depicts the overall team structure for this project.

Jeff Cooper, PE,
will serve as
Principal-inCharge. Jeff will
provide oversight
and expertise with
his over 40 years of experience
providing management of similar
plans throughout Southern
California.

Carmen Kasner,
PE will serve as our
Quality Assurance/
Quality Control
Manager and
Technical Advisor.

Carmen offers vast insight into
inventory development and
condition assessment of agency
assets.

Julian Palacios,
PE, will provide
CIP and condition
assessment
support, bringing
his extensive
experience with public agency
wastewater projects throughout
Southern California.

Cynthia Peraza,
PE, will serve as the
Project Manager.

She currently serves
in this role for
several recent and
ongoing sewer master plans for
cities in Southern California and,
as such, is thoroughly familiar with
the standards and expectations of
cities.

James Owens,
PE, LEED AP has
experience that
spans a variety
of water and
wastewater projects
that include conceptual design,
planning financing and design
phases. James will support efforts
associated with development of
the CIP projects and Master Plan.

Jerome Watts, PE,
is NASSCO certified
and has performed
condition
assessments and
supported hydraulic
model efforts for master plan
updates. He will be performing
the condition assessment of
infrastructure and supporting
development of the Master Plan.

Amy Storey, LEED
AP, has 17 years of
experience providing
geodatabase design,
GIS web mapping
and applications
development, GIS analysis, data
acquisition and conversion,
project management through GIS
MapBooks as well as drafting and
Civil3D experience. Amy will be
instrumental in developing the
City's GIS.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 4

SUBCONSULTANT TEAM AND EXPERIENCE
NV5 routinely uses subconsultants to enhance our capabilities and ability to perform. For this project, we have selected West Coast Civil (WCC) for development of the dynamic hydraulic model and support with identifying CIP projects and National Plant Services (NPS) for their expertise in performing CCTV inspections. West Coast Civil (WCC) is a minority business enterprise that specializes in a wide variety of projects, including Sewer Master Planning. WCC has a proven track record of performance as a subconsultant to NVS over the last 10-15 years, including with the City of Coronado Sewer Master Plan and the City of La Mesa Sewer System Master Plan Update. NPS operates as a full service sewer and storm drain cleaning, inspection and maintenance contractor and has served several agencies including the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District.

ORGANIZAT ION CHART
The project team, illustrated in the organizational chart below, will be under the overall administration of Cynthia Peraza, PE, as Project Manager, who has managed and prepared multiple master plans for various agencies in Southern California. Together with Carmen Kasner, PE, QA/QC and Technical Advisor, their experience, familiarity with Southern California municipal agencies, and development of master plans to prioritize the City's existing and future sewer capacity and rehabilitation needs, and to fully comply with the state and regional requirements, supports an efficient, cost-effective smoothly run project. The project team we have assembled has worked together on a variety of projects that are similar in nature to the City's project. If one or more of NVS's staff should become unavailable, NVS may substitute other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City.
* Jeffrey Cooper, PE
* Key Personnel
S c> .o, 'ta

CONDITION ASSESSMENT
*Julian Palacios, PE
* Jerome Watts, PE

HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
*K}I [' D vQ CC

CITY OF STANTON
Joe Ames, PE, TE
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
*Cynthia Peraza, PE

SEWER MASTER

PLAN & CIP
*Cynthia Peraza, PE
*James Owens, PE, LEED AP

TECHNICAL ADVISOR I
QA/QC
*Carmen Kasner, PE

SEWER SYSTEM INSPECTIONS
I c t S

GIS & SEWER ATLAS MAPS
*Amy Storey, LEED AP
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 5

KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR PROJECTS
Over the years, NV5 has achieved an enviable reputation for a high level of quality, integrity, and responsiveness to our clients. Because of this, we attract individuals who are excited by their work. Our commitment to quality is reflected in every job we do.

We have assembled a team of highly qualified professionals in the required disciplines for your project. The qualifications table below shows our key personnel and their roles on similar projects. Complete resumes are provided in the Appendix.

KEY POSITlON I

PERSONNEL' FIRM/YRS OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

ROLE EXPERIENCE
Jeff Cooper, PE Managing » City of Laguna Beach Sewer Siphon Replacement Engineer » City of Burbnak Third Street and Olive Avenue Sanitary Sewer Main Principal in Charge 40 years
» City of Lomita Master Plan Update and Urban Water Management Plan Carmen Kasner, PE Regional
» City of Cardiff and Encinitas Sewer Master
» City of Poway Sewer System Master Plan
Technical Advisor, Managing Director » City of El Cajon Sewer System Management Plan Update QA/QC 31years » City of Encinitas Citywide Asset Management Plan and Rate Study » City of Oceanside Sewer System Management Plan
» City of Cardiff and Encinitas Sewer Master Plans
Cynthia Peraza, PE
» City of La Mesa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Update Assistant Regional » City of Encinitas Citywide Asset Management Plan and Rate Study Project Manager, Managing Director » City of Pomona Sewer System Management Plan Development Sewer Master Plan 27 years
» City of Coronado Wastewater Master Plan and Rate Update and CIP » Cucamonga Valley Water District Sewer System Management Plan Development » City of Anaheim Sewer System Management Plan Update/Audit » Inland Empire Utilities Agency CCTV Pipeline and Manhole Inspection and Assessment Julian Palacios, PE Engineering » City of Encinitas Citywide Sewer Master Plan Update and Sewer Rate Study CIP and Condition Manager » City of National City Sewer Master Plan Update Assessment 21years » City of El Centro Water and Wastewater Master Plan » Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District Utility Master Plan Update » Miramar College Water System Evaluation and Design
James Owens, PE Engineering » City of El Centro Water and Wastewater Master Plan Amendment Sewer Master Plan Manager » City of Port Hueneme Wastewater Collection System Master Plan and CIP 20 years
» City of Bishop Water and Wastewater Master Plan
» City of Seely Water and Wastewater Master Plan
Jerome Watts, PE Engineer » City of National City Sewer Master Plan Update Sewer Master Plan 3 years » Santa Margarita Water District Condition Assessment of High Priority Sewer Pipelines and CIP, Condition
Assessment
Amy Storey, LEED Senior Engineer » City on National City Sewer and City-Wide GIS updates AP 17 years » City of El Cajon Citywide Sewer System Smoke Testing GIS Development,
Atlas Maps
Kyle McCarty, PE, Principal Engineer » City of Coronado Wastewater Master Plan and Rate Update PMP, CQM (WCC) 17 years
» City of Poway Wastewater Master Plan
» City of Escondido Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Master Plan Sewer Master » City of La Mesa Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Plan, CIP, Hydraulic Analysis
Jeff Garcia (NPS) Vice President » City of Arcadia Citywide CCTV Inspection CCTV Inspections 19 years
» City of San Gabriel City Wide Sewer Line CCTV Inspection » LA County Department of Public Works 75 Mile Sewer Pipe CCTV City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 6

UNDERSTANDING
The City of Stanton's (City's) previous Master Plan was updated in 2013 and the City is seeking to perform a comprehensive Sewer Master Plan (Master Plan) Update to reflect growth in development, modifications to the wastewater system, and ongoing water conservation efforts.

Additionally, updating the Master Plan will serve to reevaluate the City's existing and future sewer capacity and rehabilitation needs, provide recommendations for improvements and prepare a preliminary opinion of probable cost for the proposed improvements. The Master Plan Update will include a description of the methodology used to complete the study and provide an overall representation of the condition of the City's wastewater collection system and future capacity needs. The findings will be used to determine future financial needs to implement the improvements identified.

The City continues to work to proactively and systematically maintain its wastewater infrastructure and assure an appropriate level of services to its customers. The City's system includes approximately 55.4 miles of wastewater collection system gravity mains and pipelines and approximately 550 manholes.

In addition to providing City staff with information that can be used for planning, management, and operation and maintenance of its wastewater system to assure an appropriate level of service, an update of the Master Plan will ultimately allow the City to:
• Address capacity issues through the update of the
hydraulic model
• Strategically and systematically prioritize existing and projected improvements
• Reduce the occurrences of emergency repairs
• Extend asset service life

OBJECTIVES
• Minimize cost of operating, maintaining, and
renewing assets
• Direct budgeted resources toward sustaining
the performance of assets
• Facilitate development of funding and
revenue plans
NV5 presents our understanding of the City's objectives for development of a comprehensive Master Plan Update, which include:
• Evaluating the hydraulic capacity of the wastewater collection system • Evaluating the condition of the system through by performing CCTV inspections of the wastewater system • Verifying the accuracy of the existing sewer infrastructure data • Determining the ownership of all sewer lines and maintenance responsibilities of the City of Stanton • Preparing an update to the City's GIS and sewer Atlas Maps • Evaluating the effective remaining life of the system • Developing a comprehensive prioritized Capital Improvement Program for a 10 year planning horizon • Incorporating the needs that align with the City's General Plan • Evaluating the status of the regulatory permits (Waste Discharge Requirements) • Apprising City staff of the latest Federal, State, and Local Regulations as they pertain to the wastewater collection system
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 7

PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH
NV5 further highlights our key areas
of understanding to meet your project
goals and we present our project
methodology and approach to complete
your Master Plan Update. Our proposed
methodology and technical approach,
summarized in the following sections
and illustrated in the figure below,
will maximize value from the process
to develop a sustainable process for
long-term Operation and Maintenance
(O&M) needs. Our approach will help
guide the City towards its objectives of
proactive and sustainable wastewater
Existing
Collection
System Inventory
Our approach to developing the
Sewer Master Plan builds off our
extensive experience in preparing
Master Plans.
management, service reliability, predictive maintenance and replacement programs and developing and maintaining an acceptable level of service. The anticipated level of effort can be found in our separately submitted fee breakdown.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
NV5 understands the importance of maintaining the project schedule. Our firm's successful history is integrally tied to meeting our client's deadlines. We achieve these results by designing not only the project deliverable but also the project management process. NV5 will start with a clearly defined program, involve decision makers, schedule progress meetings with clearly defined agendas and action items, and establish and adhere to project milestones
r O ECT l\'i.A NI n 1rt'T .A PrROl'CI-'
Every project requires oversight and management to stay on task and on schedule. NV5 will work closely with City staff in the most complete, cost-effective, and efficient manner to keep the project tasks focused. Our Project Manager, Cynthia Peraza, PE, will be the direct, day-to-day point of contact for City staff. She is a very hands-on project manager and understands the details of design and City processes, as well as having the experience to see the big picture of any project.

Progress and resolution of schedule issues will be communicated through regular in-person meetings, e-mails and telephone contact, and will be supplemented by monthly written progress reports. Through our extensive engineering experience on complex projects, NV5 has developed proven schedule measures and tools to maintain project momentum and successfully complete projects on-time. Some of these measures include:
• Holding regular resource allocation meetings
• Listing action items and following up weekly or more frequently as required • Conducting monthly progress meetings
• Budget tracking
• Regularly updating the schedule
• Progress reporting
• Prepare, update and distribute monthly status reports and e-mail updates One (1) meeting will serve as the project kick off meeting to review scope of services, present a work plan, identify key staff, and review the project schedule. It is assumed that the meeting will be conducted by video conference and be up to two (2) hours in duration. However, if the City does have accommodations to allow proper distancing, City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 8
�
face to face is preferred and is acceptable. In attendance will be NV5's Project Manager, Technical Advisor, our CCTV Contractor, Hydraulic Modeling Lead, and other core project team members if necessary.

NV5 has assumed up to six (6) meetings will be coordinated and attended through the project duration. At this time, and for estimating purposes, it is assumed each meeting will be conducted by telephone or video conference and be up to one (1) hour in duration exclusive of meeting preparation and follow-up meeting minute preparation effort. Work progress and schedules are fixed agenda items for all progress meetings.

Meeting attendance will include NV5's Project Manager and key representatives relevant to the discussion topics including a technical representative to respond to City questions on key issues when necessary. NV5 will maintain an action item log to be reviewed and updated at each meeting, take meeting notes, develop and provide meeting minutes to City staff for review and comment within four (4) business days of the meeting. NV5 will revise the meeting minutes to reflect pertinent City comments and finalize and distribute the minutes.

QUALITY CONTROL
Accurate, complete and timely deliverables are our most important priority. Therefore, our quality assurance and quality control plan is included and incorporated as a standard procedure that starts upon the receipt of the project's notice to proceed. NV5 will have our QA/QC manager review deliverables prior to each milestone submittal to facilitate quality submittals allowing the City to focus on the key elements of the project. We ask for the same level of commitment from all of our NV5 team members.

Our QC policy requires our lead technical staff and project manager to sign off on the deliverables and commit that they have reviewed the submittal and are accepting responsibility for the quality of the documents. A quality assurance team, consisting of QA/QC advisor, Carmen Kasner, PE, providing technical oversight who will provide guidance and independent review of deliverables. Before any submittal to the City, all draft materials are independently reviewed internally, corrected as necessary, and then produced for delivery.

Carmen has 29 years of experience in wastewater, water and recycled water master planning and has served as project manager on multiple wastewater master plans.

The QA/QC process will provide a method to monitor the thoroughness of the reviews and help to identify potentially conflicting comments. As necessary, Carmen will help address and resolve any potential conflicts.

DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW
NV5 will work with City staff to obtain and perform a thorough review of the current City-provided data, including as built drawings, City utility map sets, City capital improvement project records, the current list of projects identified in the planning horizon, O&M records, and repair and replacement records. Additionally, NV5 will review the City's General Plan, the 2021-2029 Housing Element, which will be used to analyze the potential impacts of the anticipated lands uses and population projections within the City boundary. NV5 believes interviews with City engineering and operations staff is essential in understanding the operations and conditions of the system and facilities. It is assumed that one (1) meeting with engineering staff and one meeting with operations staff will be performed. The meetings will be by video conference and be up to one (1) hour in duration exclusive of meeting preparation and summarizing the notes.

NV5 will review the City's GIS files containing asset information for the wastewater facilities. It is assumed the City will provide the information electronically and that files will contain data pertinent to the wastewater collection system including gravity pipelines and manholes. For gravity pipelines it is assumed the shape-files will contain attribute data including but not limited to the unique asset identified assigned to each pipeline and manhole, pipeline length, material and diameter, slope, invert elevations, year of installation, respective repair and maintenance information, and other historical information. For manholes, it is assumed that information contained in the shape-files includes but is not limited to year of installation, depth, and respective repair and maintenance history.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 9
c' ... 'ti
As the City's sewer service area is within the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD's) service area, NV5 will review information available and provided by the City to confirm limits ownership and maintenance responsibilities between adjoining agencies which may including the cities of Anaheim, Buena Park, Garden Grove, Cypress, and Westminster.
p
• Summary of the findings of information reviewed

FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
NV5 understands the City desires to have the entire sanitary sewer (55 miles) collection system inspected using Closed Caption Television (CCTV). For inspection of the City's twelve (12) siphons, it is assumed that only the down leg and up leg of the siphons will be inspected. The inspections will be conducted in compliance with National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) standards. NASSCO condition and defect data, compliant with Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP) standards and approved by the City, will be used to capture the information in a database that can be associated with each pipe asset. National Plant Services (NPS) staff is trained and NASSCO PACP certified and will meet the requirements as set forth in the RFP.

Our inspection subconsultant, NPS, has the expertise to provide the inspection services required for this project.

They use remote control cameras to document the general pipe condition system defects, and to conduct manhole inspections. While this effort for the inspection of the manhole is not included as part of this project, the inspections can be included as an additional task and fee should the City chose to include these inspections as part of the project.

NV5 will work with our subconsultant and City staff to prioritize the facilities for inspection which may include the older areas and larger diameter pipes. NV5 will work with NPS to assemble inspection areas into task areas to facilitate efficient inspection of the pipelines. Using the City's existing Atlas Maps, NV5 will coordinate the inspections and maps will be shared with the crews performing the inspections.

It is assumed that all pipe segments are readily accessible. However, if after review of City provided data, it is determined there may be pipe segments where bypassing and/or sewer overflow response plans may be required to obtain the best inspection data, NV5 will notify the City and subsequent procedures will be discussed and determined.

For purposes of developing this scope of services and the associated fee estimate, it is assumed all pipelines are accessible, will not require night time work, bypassing, nor a sewer overflow response plan.

Using the City's existing Atlas Maps, the NV5 team will conduct field reconnaissance to obtain specific site information about access ----
I l j
-,' ??;;:.:_'.-�=.
--�11�?{tN�:-
.__ - ....... -
. '4':.; --.4. �-
:;:_ I '
-:- .. ! ..
- ���==--:.-=-.:.-=- _J_ t (;_{( -··-
�::--.- i· ·- '
._ .... -,- . . .
1-==== -2_--_·-_ ---==---�
constrains, potential issues with accessibility of manholes, such as those located in easements, requiring special tools/keys for lock removal, required access codes, or those requiring coordination with City staff.

Reconnaissance information that will require coordination and scheduling efforts with City staff will be provided to the City project manager to avoid project delays. Based on initial review of information, we anticipate that manholes to access the pipelines are visible and accessible.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 10
CCTV r:sr ecf !1S
The CCTV inspection data will be collected using the latest version of the Granite software (Granite Net) developed by CUES. It is assumed the pipelines will not be cleaned prior to performing the inspections.

The CCTV inspections will serve to document the existing infrastructure, visible structural defects including, misalignments, offset joints, cracked pipeline, rooting levels and other pertinent observations. For consistency, the CCTV video inspections will be conducted to include information displayed on the screen during the inspections, including date, direction of inspection, starting manhole, ending manhole, etc. The information collected will be assembled and included in a comprehensive database to allow for integration with the City's CMMS should the City choose. NV5 will document inconsistencies in the data captured using CCTV and what is noted in the GIS and notify the City of the of necessary updates.

T ·aff1c Control
Traffic control will be provided by NPS during inspection of the pipelines which will conform to requirements of the current WATCH or CA MUTCD. NPS will set up proper traffic control including in heavy traffic areas that may require the use of properly trained flagmen or a more extensive traffic control set up. Where necessary, NV5 will coordinate with the City to place No Parking signs up to 72 hours prior to inspections. NV5 assumes the City will provide the required traffic control plans and No Parking signs should they be required. Where traffic control permits may be required, NV5 will coordinate with the City and it is assumed permit fees will be incurred by the City. onf r ns e or re' � sses-,'Tien Ra e, �ys
Prior to commencing inspections, NV5 will confirm the methodology to be used for assessing the condition of the pipelines including the assessment methods, and how the proposed scoring/ranking will be performed. A summary documenting the condition assessment findings and recommendations for the sewer pipelines will be prepared in tabular format that can be integrated into the City's GIS. The summary will include the following:
• City provided asset ID and other pipeline attributes • Recommended rehabilitation methods
• Assessment condition scoring/ranking
NV5 team members are NASSCO certified and
thoroughly trained in identifying the defects to
attain objective and consistent results. NV5 will
review the CCTV videos of the 55 miles televised
to assure the quality of the video and confirm
documentation of the noted defects, lateral
Observation
Cracks
• Circular
• Longitudinal
• Multiple
Broken Pipe
Joints - Offset
Joints -
Separation
A
No Action
No Action
No Action
No Action
B
No Action or
Rehab,htate
No Action or
Rehabilitate
No Action or
Rehabilitate
Rehabilitate
SeveMty Ranking
C D
No Action or Rehabilitate
Rehablhtate
Point Repair or Point Repair or
Rehablhtate/ Rehabilitate/
Replace Replace
Point Repair or Point Repair or
Rehabllltate/ Rehabilitate/
Replace Replace
Rehabilitate Point Repair or
Rehab1htate/
Rehab1htate or
Replace
Point Repair
and/or
Rehab1htate,
Re lace
Rehab1l1tate
or Replace
locations, and assess the condition of the pipeline. f-R-o-ots -- --+-No-A-cti-"on-+-C-le-an-a-nd---f-----+-'"""'"""----+- Re lace Clean and Clean and Clean and
Del v r t les
• Summary of condition assessment and recommendations
• CCTV Video Inspections, Digital Format
• Pipeline Inspection Reports, Digital Format
Debris No Action
Accumulation
Erosion No Action
(typical concrete
pipe)
Mineral Deposits No Action
Rehabilitate
Clean
Rehabilitate
No Action or
Rehabilitate
Infiltration No Action No Action or
Rehabihtate
Sag No Action No Action
Flow Capacity No Action No Action
Rehabilitate
Clean
Rehablhtate or
Replace
Point Repair or
Rehablhtate/
Replace
Potnt Repair or
Rehablhtate/
Replace
Any Option
No Action
Example of recommendation criteria developed.

Rehabi litate Rehabilitate/
Replace
Clean Clean
Rehab1lltate or
Replace
Rehabilitate
Rehabilitate
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 11

SEWER SYSTEM FLOW DEVELOPMENT
The following tasks describe the update of the sewer system hydraulic model and preparation of a capacity analysis. The tasks include determining base ROIi, the design storm event, development of future flow forecasts, model creation and calibration, and identification of capacity projects.

Using water use records from Golden State Water, the City's water purveyor for the City's service area, we will compare a "return-to-sewer" flow rate for various land uses based on water consumption. Coupled with existing residential and non-residential population estimates, information contained in the City's General Plan, regional planning information for future population estimates, the NV5 team will confirm residential, non-residential, and per- capita unit generation rates. The NV5 team will coordinate with the City's Planning Division regarding land use and potential developments that will impact the sewer system to establish the existing and projected connected parcels and develop Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) growth projections for the 10 year planning horizon. Residential and commercial flow factors will be confirmed, compared against other municipalities, and ultimately confirmed by City staff. Working with City staff, NV5 will apply design criteria for determining and defining average and peak flow conditions, and incorporate acceptable allowances for l&I.

CAPACITY ANALYSIS
The following tasks describe the preparation of a capacity analysis, which includes review of background data, development of future flow estimates, model update, model calibration, future model forecasts, and identification of capacity projects. It is assumed the City will provide NV5 with a copy of the City's comprehensive and current Info-Sewer hydraulic model. It is assumed the model was developed using the City's most current GIS information. NV5 has identified the following critical steps for updating and preparing an accurate model. 'L
Model loading consists of three (3) components, including populations, unit factors, and diurnal curves.

Residential and employment populations will be obtained from regional planning agencies for the sewer drainage basins, delineated as part of the model update. Populations will be applied to unit generation factors to confirm and update an average inflow at specified manholes. The average inflow will then be applied to timevarying dimensionless hydrographs or diurnal patterns and input into the model to be routed through the sewer system. NV5 will review the sewer drainage basins, if any, evaluate residential and employment factors, and confirm diurnal patterns or residential and employment populations.

The analysis will incorporate land use based on the City's General Plan, and information from the 2021-2029 Housing Element to allow for the evaluation of the impacts to the infrastructure. [A
NV5 will use the City's billing database coupled with the residential and non-residential population estimates, information contained in the City's General Plan, the 2021-2029 Housing Element to determine residential and non-residential per- capita unit generation rates. NV5 will confirm the existing and projected connected parcels to the system and develop EDU growth projections for the 10 year planning horizon.

I 1fl 'l It t II
With climate change occurring, NV5 will determine the intensity duration of recent storms and compare to the pertinent storm events. An evaluation of the 1&1 under storm events will be performed to determine if 1&1 reduction has taken place due to City-implemented condition rehabilitation projects. Additionally, NV5 will determine the appropriate 1&1 factors to be used to update the model. Flow estimates for the 10 year planning horizon will be developed.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 12
) MODEL UPDATE AND CALIBRATION
NV5 will develop a well-calibrated model to utilize in determining the capacity capital improvement projects and will:
• Input residential and employment diurnal patterns.
• Summarize basin residential and employment populations and input into the model.
• Input 1&1 factors.
• Calibrate unit use factors and diurnal patterns to flows within 5% of the peak flow and 10% of the volume. @ii:ii
• Calibrate the model for existing dry weather and wet weather conditions. • Conduct an existing wet weather analysis to evaluate the potential impact of a design storm occurring with existing flows.

Once calibrated, the model will be utilized to analyze existing and projected capacity constraints to identify existing and potential deficiencies. NV5 will evaluate the sewer system capacity analysis of existing system conditions under peak flow and identify system deficiencies for the 10 year planning horizon and identify future relief and/or replacement sewers to meet future wastewater flow conditions.

Our Model Calibration
helps you make good
decisions
A properly calibrated model
provides: the confidence
needed to make significant
capital planning decisions, a
reliable planning tool to make WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM good operational decisions, and the ability to respond to Development of cost-effective improvement projects need regulatory changes. to consider not just capacity, but also current condition, operation and maintenance costs, and anticipated growth. NV5 prides itself on developing CIPs that provide our clients the best "bang for the buck." While hydraulic models will determine capacity constraints within the system, just as important is identification of assets that are nearing their useful life and that may not have capacity issues. A thorough evaluation of the system condition to determine the life cycle of the existing infrastructure will assist in budgeting long-term replacement and rehabilitation costs. It is assumed that the City's GIS information includes installation dates to be used to determine the system life cycle.
..

Replacement
t
CIP
$
Rehabilitation
falt
Capacity
l
Useful Life
Using the findings from our data research and field investigations, NV5 will develop the CIP necessary for the proper and efficient management of the citywide sewer infrastructure. The CIP will document the capacity and condition related deficiencies and will serve as a basis for developing the plan for the wastewater collection system.

To develop a prioritized improvement schedule, projections of the identified improvements will be developed and a risk-based replacement and rehabilitation strategy, to enable maintenance of the sewer system in a satisfactory structural condition over a 10- year planning horizon, will be established.

Identified priorities will be incorporated into a comprehensive replacement and rehabilitation plan and schedule for the implementation over the City's 10-year horizon. NV5 will prepare estimates of probable construction costs necessary to perform the recommended repairs for the system pipelines. An estimated cost for the anticipated expenditures will be prepared and include the appropriate Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CIP will be summarized in tabular format and include asset information including, pipeline size, material, slope, capacity status, and design flows.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 13
NV5 will develop a phased master spreadsheet of the CIP projects based on the recommendations and weighing of costs and benefits. The spreadsheet will serve to be dynamic and allow City staff to update as local conditions change, development occurs, coinciding improvements are identified (i.e. street improvements), and as additional pipeline condition analyses are completed.
el r�t I .,
• Prioritized CIP including a description of the deficiencies, recommended improvements and cost estimates

MASTER PLAN UPDATE
The work performed in the previous task will be compiled into a comprehensive planning document. NV5's approach includes developing a report outline that will address all key items developed and be fine-tuned based on ongoing discussions with the City. The Master Plan Update will include the findings from previous tasks as well as the items specifically listed in the RFP.
• Draft Sewer Master Plan
• Final Master Plan Update and associated documents

UPDATE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM GIS AND ATLAS MAPS
Our geospatial professionals have the knowledge and resources to provide a well-rounded and holistic approach to the development of geospatial solutions. Our goal is to make complex data environments more usable, intuitive, and effective for users at all levels of your organization. Using the City's GIS data and software, NV5 will review existing GIS wastewater layer and atlas maps. NV5 will work with City staff to update and populate fields where information is incorrect, incomplete or missing, and include a digital orthophoto background. Information obtained through field investigations that differs from the information contained in the GIS files will be shared with City staff. Upon confirmation, NV5 will update the GIS file to reflect the field conditions. It is assumed up to twenty-four (24) hours will be required for this effort. The Atlas Maps will reflect updated information and will graphically represent the location and interconnectivity of the City's wastewater collection system assets. The maps will depict the location of gravity sewer and manholes. .t'
'-'-----=-=.::.....u<-- i t>, -"'"'---=-'---"----�------------l.:.'· ' _;�__J S.we, System PlpH 1 ntl'l•200-
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NVS.COM I 14
) Using data conversion tools, NV5 will extract asset data from the geodatabase and develop the atlas maps to provide the City staff to use to schedule and perform work systematically and efficiently. In addition to the information currently displayed on the maps, NV5 will include the following attributes:
• Sewer pipe diameter, depth, slope, material
• Manhole IDs, invert depths, and current condition ratings (structural and/or O&M) • Flow direction indicators
• Indication of private lines and sewer easements
It is assumed that one (1) round of comments received from City staff will be incorporated and the atlas map pages will be finalized.
ehv r"'l el:,,
• A draft copy of one (1) sample atlas map page in electronic format, and one (1) 11 x 17 hard copy will be submitted for the City's review and comment.
• Electronic copy of each map in PDF format, and an electronic copy of the GIS project files used to create the map layouts. The GIS files will be in a format that can be used by City staff to reproduce the maps.

Your
Priorities,
Our Focus
NV 5
Delivering Solutions
Improving Lives
. City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 15
ID Task Name
0 Project Award
Project NTP
2 Kick-Off Meeting
3 Progress Meetings
4 Data Collection/ Review
5 Provide Data Request
6 Receive/ Review Data
7 Staff Interviews
----l 8 Field Investigations
9 Reconnaissance
10 Conduct Sewer CCTV Survey
11 Perform Sewer Assessment
12 Prepare/ Submit Deliverables
13 Sewer Flow Projections
14 Water Use Records
15 Unit Generation Rates
16 EDU/ Growth Projections
17 Capacity Analysis
18 Land Use/ Model Loading
19 Model Update and Calibration � Flow Estimates
� Capital Improvement Projects
---I
22 Condition/Capacity Projects
.....---1 23 Evaluation Remaining Life-System
24 Prioritize CIP
25 Cost Estimate
26 Prepare Draft CIP List
27 City Review
28 Meeting With City
29 Sewer Master Plan Update
30 Evaluation Regulatory Permit/ WDRs
31 Draft Report
32 Submit Draft Report to City
33 City Review
34 Meeting With City
35 Final Report
36 Prepare/ Submit Deliverables
37 Update GIS and Atlas Maps
38 GIS Updates
39 Prepare Draft for City Review
40 City Review
41 City Meeting
42 Draft Atlas Maps
43 City Review
44 Finalize Atlas Maps
Duration Start
231 days Mon 1/3/22
1 day
1 day
225 days
20 days
1 day
10 days
2 days
148 days
2 days
120 days
121 days
10 days
30 days
20 days
5 days
5 days
46 days
10 days
30 days
5 days
90 days
60 days
30 days
10 days
10 days
1 day
5 days
1 day
127 days
5 days
60 days
1 day
10 days
1 day
20 days
5 days
56 days
20 days
5 days
5 days
1 day
10 days
5 days
10 days
Mon 1/3/22
Mon 1/10/22
Mon 1/10/22
Tue 1/11/22
Mon 1/10/22
Mon 1/24/22
Mon 1/31/22
Mon 2/7/22
Mon 2/7/22
Mon 2/14/22
Mon 2/28/22
Mon 8/8/22
Mon 2/7/22
Mon 2/7/22
Thu 3/3/22
Thu 3/10/22
Mon 3/21/22
Mon 3/21/22
Mon 4/4/22
Mon 5/16/22
Mon 5/23/22
Mon 5/23/22
Mon 8/8/22
Mon 8/8/22
Mon 8/22/22
Mon 9/5/22
Tue 9/6/22
Tue 9/13/22
Mon 5/23/22
Mon 5/23/22
Fri 7 /1/22
Mon 9/19/22
Tue 9/20/22
Tue 10/4/22
Wed 10/5/22
Wed 11/2/22
Mon 8/22/22
Mon 8/22/22
Mon 9/19/22
Mon 9/26/22
Mon 10/3/22
Tue 10/4/22
Tue 10/18/22
Tue 10/25/22
Finish �an '22
2 9
Tue 11/8/22
Mon 1/3/22 H
Mon 1/10/22 ... '
Mon 11/7/22
Fri 2/4/22
Mon 1/10/22 ...

I
Fri 2/4/22
Tue 2/1/22
Fri 8/19/22
Tue 2/8/22
Thu 7 /21/22
Fri 8/5/22
Fri 8/19/22
Wed 3/16/22
Wed 3/2/22
Wed 3/9/22
Wed 3/16/22
Fri 5/20/22
Fri 4/1/22
Fri 5/13/22
Fri 5/20/22
Fri 9/16/22
Fri 8/5/22
Fri 9/16/22
Fri 8/19/22
Fri 9/2/22
Mon 9/5/22
Mon 9/12/22
Tue 9/13/22
Tue 11/8/22
Fri 5/27 /22
Fri 9/16/22
Mon 9/19/22
Mon 10/3/22
Tue 10/4/22
Tue 11/1/22
Tue 11/8/22
Mon 11/7/22
Fri 9/16/22
Fri 9/23/22
Fri 9/30/22
Mon 10/3/22
Mon 10/17 /22
Mon 10/24/22
Mon 11/7/22
City of Stanton
Schedule for Sewer Master Plan 2021
Feb '22 Mar'22 Apr'22 Jul '22 !Au '22 I Sep '22 Oct '22 16 23 30 6 13 20 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 12 19 26 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 1 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 6 23 ...

I
I
14 ...
11111
...
...
.... '
....
... I
►
1 ...
... f
'IC
...
... I
-
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 16
.....J .J
RESOURCE ALLOCATION MATRIX N I V 15
NV 5
1ra11�-.-•ll•••••1�i ,1:1• . ·-•111 ,,. .

Phase Task Task/Sub OSPP OSMP OSMP OSSP OSJP OSPA OSSCT OSCT2 HOURS Projecct Management
Kick-Off Meeting 2 2 2 2 8
Project Status Meetings (Assume 6) 6 6 6 10 6 34
Project Management I Coordination/ Schedule 20 12 32 'Subtotal - 74 Data Collection and Review
Data Coordination and Management 4
Review General Plan/Housing Element 2 2 4
Review GIP Projects/ Records/ Atlas Map(s) 4 2 4 1 2 13 Review O&M Records 1 2 3
Review Condition Projects 1 1 2 4
Review Existing Hydraulic Model 1 2 3
Review GIS Files/ Information 2 2 4 8
Staff Interviews (Ops and Engineering) 2 4 2 8
Confirm Owership/Maintenance Responsibilities 1 2 3
Subtotal -50-
Field Investigations
Inspection Set Up/ Coordination with Contractor 1 4 5
Reconnaisance 20 20
Confirm Condition Assessment/ Rating System 1 2 3
NPS · CCTV Inspections 0
NPS CCTV Siphons 0
Review CCTV Videos / Perform Assessment (55 miles) 2 12 600 8 622 Prepare Deliverables 2 16 8 26
QA/QC 2 2
Subtotal �
• 1,._ ...... • • • . � .
• .. • •
TOTAL· THIS PAGE 4 32 23 24 674 36 3 6 802
TOTAL· ALL PAGES 20 32 48 66 1028 72 22 126 1,414
C,ty of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 17
RESOURCE ALLOCATION MATRIX N I V 15
NV S
•
• ••• ,i., . :'!el'· 1-1T1 •,=ii=- :r1111•
Phase Task Task/Sub OSPP OSMP OSMP OSSP OSJP OSPA OSSCT OSCT2 HOURS Sewer Flow Projections
Evaluation of Water Data 4 4 40 48
Confirm Unit Generation Rates 1 1 4 6
EDU / Growth Projections 1 2 8 11
Coordinate with City Planning 1 2 2 5
Evaluation of Other Municipalities 1 1 2 4
Confirm Design Elements/ Criteria 1 2 3
ONQC 4 4
Subtotal 81
Capacity Analysis
Land Use / Model Loading 1 2 16 19
wee - Model Update and Calibration 0
Flow Estimates 2 4 24 30
ONOC 2 2
Subtotal 51
Capital Improvement Projects
Identification of Condition Projects 2 2 16 1 8 29
Identification of Capacity Projects 2 2 24 1 8 37
Evaluate Remaining Life 1 4 20 1 8 34
Prioritize/ Phase CIPs 1 2 16 19
Cost Estimates 1 4 20 25
QNQC 4 4
Subtotal 148
Sewer Master Plan Update
Draft Report 4 8 120 20 4 20 176
Final Reporl 2 4 40 16 2 8 72
ONOC 4 4
Subtotal 252
.1. .... . • . • . . .. . .

TOTAL -THIS PAGE 14 0 25 42 354 36 9 52 532
TOTAL- ALL PAGES 20 32 48 66 1028 72 22 126 1 414
Coty of Stanton I Sewer l\1aster Plan NVS.COM I
RESOURCE ALLOCATION MATRIX N I V 15
NV 5
I .... • i'l:le • •-el1 ae1■••
Phase Task TaskJSub OSPP OSMP OSMP OSSP OSJP OSPA OSSCT OSCT2 HOURS Sewer System GIS and Atlas Map Updates
GIS Updates 4 20 24
Draft Atlas Map Book Development 4 36 40
Finalize Atlas Map Book 2 12 14
QNQC 2 2
Subtotal -so
End of Task
• .. • . • • . .. . .

TOTAL -THIS PAGE 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 68 80
TOTAL -ALL PAGES 20 32 48 66 1028 72 22 126 1,414
C,ty of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I

RECENT EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
The NV5 team has been assisting various agencies in the development and update of agency specific Sewer Master Plans and believe that our experience is the key indicator of your project's success. NV5 understands the importance of being responsive to our clients and achieving the City's goals and objectives. Our team has demonstrated our capabilities many times over as outlined by a few projects in the table below, and we encourage you to contact our references listed.

City of Encinitas
Engineering Services
Dept.
505 S. Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
Julie Ballesteros, PE,
QSD/P
Associate Engineer
760.633.2777
jballesteros@encinitasca.
gov
City of National City
Engineering and Public
Works Dept. 1243 National
City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950
Roberto Yano
Director of Public Works
/City Engineer
619.336.4380
[email protected]
City of El Cajon
200 Civic Center Way
El Cajon, CA 92020
Yazmin Arellano
Acting Director of Public
Works/City Engineer
619.441.1785
[email protected]

SEWER MASTER PLAN AND SEWER RATE UPDATE
NV5's services on the Citywide Sewer Master Plan Update and Sewer Rate Study Update includes development of the City's wastewater hydraulic model using lnfoSWMM and integrating the information contained in the City's GIS. Our team is working closely with the City staff to identify their assets that are at risk of probable failure and may become critical to their planning horizon. The probability and consequences of failure will be evaluated, including evaluating the cost of repair, social costs associated with loss of service, repair/replacement costs related to collateral damage caused by failure, legal costs, environmental costs created by a failure and other associated costs or asset losses. In a transparent rate study process, we are developing recommendations for the sewer service charges to be presented to the City Council and include recommendations for rate-based revenues sufficient for shortand long-term costs of service.

SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATE
NV5 provided planning and sewer infrastructure condition assessment services in support of the City's CIP. Services included updating the City's 2011 Sewer System Master Plan, review of CCTV inspection videos and reports, improvements prioritization, manhole inspections, hydraulic modeling and development of a Sewer Master Plan Update. NV5 utilized historical flow data from flow meters at the connection to the City of San Diego sewer system and connections from adjacent municipalities into the City's collection system to assess current wastewater generation rates and diurnal patterns for each sewer basin to update the hydraulic model. Based on the findings of the CCTV inspection, manhole inspections, flow data and hydraulic modeling, NV5 provided recommendations to update the City's CIP for sewer infrastructure.

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
Reviewed and evaluated the City's existing SSMP prepared in compliance with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board in 2005 in compliance with the General Waste Discharge Requirements, Order No. RB-2002-0014. Assisted with the preparation of an audit and recommendations report that summarized the City's existing activities, policies, and procedures and provided recommendations for updates and/ or revisions for compliance with the state's WDR requirements.

Assisted with conducting staff interviews of key staff, developing a comprehensive Operations and Maintenance
Program, updating the City's Sanitary Sewer Overflow
Response and Reporting Plan, and preparing a comprehensive and updated SSMP document to reflect current conditions as they pertained to the City's wastewater collection system and to achieve WDR compliance.
2019 -
2021
2018-
2020
2019-
2021
Carmen Kasner, PE
Principal-in-Charge
and QA/QC
Cynthia Peraza, PE
Project Manager
Carmen Kasner, PE
Principal-in-Charge
Julian Palacios, PE
Project Manager
Jerome Watts, PE
Project Engineer
Carmen Kasner, PE
Principal-in-Charge
Cynthia Peraza, PE
Project Manager
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan NV5.COM I 18

DISCLOSURES
• This RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of NV5's proposal. • This RFP and the NV5 proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for this project when said Agreement is fully executed by NV5 and the Mayor or City Manager of Stanton. • NV5's services to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City's RFP. • No additions or exceptions to the City's RFP are requested. • NV5 acknowledges and understands that the consultant will not be allowed to change subconsultants without written permission from the City. • All charges for NV5 services is a "not-to-exceed fee" which must include conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made part NV5's proposal. • NV5's hourly rate schedule is part of NV5's proposal for use in invoicing for progress payments and for extra work incurred that is not part of this RFP.
• NV5 will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This may include preparation of field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement objectives. • NV5 will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the construction work. • NV5 will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
• All federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to notwithstanding any state or local laws and regulations.

In a case of conflict between federal, state or local laws or regulations the strictest shall be adhered to. • NV5 shall allow all authorized federal, state, county, and City officials access to place of work, books, documents, papers, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this special project. All relevant records shall be retained for at least three years.

MEP. GIAN2J�s0
,f; Top JOO
#19
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 19
)
) See attached resumes.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 20
)
)

INFRASTRUCTURE
/RV/NE, CA
[email protected]

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Engineering
BS, Civil Engineering
BA, Economics

EXPERIENCE
40 years

REGISTRATIONS
Civil Engineer, CA, No. 31572

AFFILIATIONS
Public Works Standards, Inc. (The
Greenbook), Treasurer
State of California Green Bond
Committee Member
American Public Works
Association, Past President
American Council of Engineering
Companies
Construction Management
Association of America
American Society of Civil
Engineers, Region 9 Governor,
Treasurer
WTS

JEFFREY COOPER, PE
Principal-In-Charge
Mr. Cooper has more than 40 years of professional consulting engineering experience providing the management of planning, design, construction, and inspection services for transportation and municipal road projects, park projects, master plans and designs for drainage, sewers, water and overhead utility undergrounding projects, which have included inventory work and condition assessment. He has overseen Plan Check Services for numerous cities in Southern California. He has extensive experience with the interpretation of plans, specifications, and related design manuals, checklists and regulations. He is currently Treasurer for the Public Works Standards, Inc., "The Green book." He has also provided QA/QC and oversight for numerous municipal engineering design contracts, including major roadways, drainage, water and sewer projects. He also has been responsible for the management of producing plans, specifications and cost estimates for street widening and extensions, including bridge improvements, and extensive utility coordination work.

Project Experience

CRESS STREET SEWER SIPHON REPLACEMENT
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH I LAGUNA BEACH. CA
Project Director. The preparation of PS&E documents for the replacement of an existing double 6-inch D.I.P. sewer siphon near Bluebird Park with a 10- inch gravity sewer system. The existing line had to remain in service while the replacement line was constructed. The construction cost was estimated at $90K and included the reconnection of several service laterals and the development of an innovative alignment to minimize impacts to the existing surface improvements in Cress Street and Bluebird Park. We also avoided impacts to existing utilities while meeting the specific project objectives.

THIRD STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE SANITARY SEWER MAIN

CITY OF BURBANK I BURBANK CA
Project Director. The design of 1,000 feet of 18-inch and 21-inch sanitary sewer up to 28 feet deep through the downtown Burbank Civic Center. This highprofile project involved abandoning existing alley sewers to make way for a City redevelopment project and rerouting the sewer in a new alignment in Third Street and Olive Avenue. The project also included investigating, evaluating, and making recommendations on alternative alignments and alternative trenchless pipeline installations considering traffic disruptions and public safety during construction.

LOMITA MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT
PLAN
CITY OF LOMITA I LOMITA. CA
Project Director. The system is supplied by two connections to the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) water system through a distribution network of approximately 42 miles of pipe. The system's total average demand is 2.2 million gallons per day. The City's transmission and distribution network was modeled using the City's water atlas maps as well as available record drawings for the City's Water Replacement Program. All pipes 4-inches and larger were included in the model. Water system demands for the model were calculated using historical water consumption records, zoning information, land use, and information included in the City's General Plan and provided by the City's Planning Department. Due to the City's topography, the City's system was broken City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 21

JEFFREY COOPER, PE

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
into three different pressure zones to deliver water at adequate pressures to its customers. The study identified system deficiencies as well as recommended improvements. The study also provided financing options available to fund the capital improvements outlined in the master plan study. In addition to modeling.the water system, an Urban Water Management Plan was prepared.

ON-CALL CAPITAL PROJECTS ENGINEERING AND

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT SERVICES
T'r OF RAl'-IC'HO PALOS \•FRDF I RAf\iCJ-,O rt LO
t=?D Cf
Project Director. Mr. Cooper is managing NV5's three-year oncall design engineering and construction management services contract with the City. Our team has provided or is currently providing professional engineering services for the following projects:
• Abalone Cove Sewer Charge Levy FY2018-19, FY2019-
20: Project Manager Jeffrey Cooper has been assisting the City by preparing the updated Abalone Sewer Charge Levy report and submitting charges to Los Angeles County.
• Hesse Park Parking Lot: This project consists of design of parking lot pavement and lighting improvements. The
City has requested NV5 to provide the design services
for the project in two phases. Phase 1 will include the preparation of the concept plans, and Phase 2 will include preparation of the construction design documents (Plans, Specifications, & Cost Estimate).

Western Corridor ALPR: NV5 is creating the specifications for the construction of streetlight poles, which will have both the luminaire and the Automatic License Plate
Recognition (ALPR) Cameras attached to them. The
cameras will be provided by Vigilant Solutions, but the City is tasked with providing the infrastructure for the cameras to be attached to. The poles will need to be designed to handle the loads associated with the cameras and be able to match the material of the existing streetlights of the neighborhood.

Abalone Cove Sewer Capacity Evaluation: Project
Manager Charlie McKinley is overseeing an evaluation of the Abalone Cove sewer system in order to identify whether capacity is available in the existing system for a proposed development.

CRYSTAL LANTERN STORM DRAIN, PHASE II
F DANA POll\iT I DANA POii\
Project Director. Mr. Cooper oversaw the design of 2,000 LF of 27-inch and 24-inch RCP storm drain on Calle La Primavera as part of the second phase of the downstream Crystal Lantern Storm Drain. The work included an innovative electronic utility detection survey to determine the location of all existing underground utilities (within 4-inch to 6-inch accuracy) to help ensure that the first design layout was also the final design.

This saved the City both time and money during the design and construction phases since no utility conflicts were encountered during construction.

AS-NEEDED CIVIL PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION

SERVICES
-
0 D E R DI r 1 l\i B r CA
Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager. Mr. Cooper oversaw the civil plan check services for the City of Diamond Bar. Project types included mostly single-family residential, as the City is an almost completely built-out community. Standards utilized included those established by the City, the County of Los Angeles, and the American Public Works Association, where applicable.

AS-NEEDED PLAN CHECK SERVICES
JF [ MC t T• EL MONT[ .A
Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager. Cooper oversaw plan checking services for the City of El Monte. Plan check services included grading, soils report reviews, sewer, water, storm drain, hydrology reports, SWPPPs, street improvement plans, signing and striping plans, street lighting, parcel/tract maps, condominium plans, easements, and lot line adjustments.

ON-CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES
r T C1.t-..A SM T '"' CA.

Project Manager. Mr. Cooper oversaw services that included grading, soils report reviews, sewer, water, storm drain, hydrology reports, SWPPPs, street improvement plans,
signing and striping plans, street lighting, parceljtract maps, condominium plans, easements, and lot line adjustments.

STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES
0 AN r C PISTr r\Q 1-\1\i JUAI\

PIS R C
Principal-in-Charge. Mr. Cooper is managing the team
providing Staff Augmentation services for the City's Utilities Department. Services provided by our team include entering and organizing applications for Domestic Water, Fire Water, and Irrigation Meter Applications; providing as-needed plan review services, including grading plans, street improvements, and encroachment permits; reviewing the City's existing sewer and storm drain facilities and prioritizing rehabilitation projects; and assisting on CIP projects; assisting the City with as-needed miscellaneous engineering duties, such as preliminary designs for conversion of septic to public sewer lines; conducting field inspections for proper determination of current and proposed conditions of construction; and responding to various questions and inquiries from the general public regarding possible utility connections, easements, and current utility conditions.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 22
)

INFRASTRUCTURE

SAN DIEGO, CA
[email protected]

EDUCATION
BS Civil Engineering,
South Dakota State University

EXPERIENCE
30 years

REGISTRATIONS/

CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer -
CA No. 50856
Professional Engineer -
AZ No. 50589

AFFILIATIONS
Society of Women Engineers
American Society of Civil
Engineers, Past President, San
Diego Section
American Public Works
Association

PUBLICATIONS
Kasner, Carmen and J. Greg
Froslie, "Principles in Practice:

Transforming an Environmental
Challenge into a Sustainable
Solution," Land and Water, May/
June 2013, 21-26.

Kasner, Carmen and J. Greg
Froslie, "Converting Lake Havasu
City," WE&T Magazine, January
2011, 52-57.

CARMEN KASNER, PE
Technical Advisor, QA/QC
Carmen has 30 years of experience in municipal services focusing on civil design of capital improvement program (CIP) projects including water, sewer and storm drain facilities; pipelines; street improvements; and site development. She offers vast insight into public participation, permitting and coordination, project and design standards and site and access constraints. Carmen's experience includes extensive levels of inventory development and condition assessment of agency assets, with projects ranging from sanitary to storm to roadway systems. Her experience also includes extensive work and coordination with various agencies in southern California involving flood control, development, transportation issues, water system capacities, sewer conditions and public meetings.

Project Experience

SEWER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
CIT'r' OF POWAY I POWAY. CA
Project manager for the City's updated sanitary sewer master plan. The update reflects the growth in development, modifications to the wastewater system, and ongoing water conservation efforts. Tasks included model development, future flow forecasting, reviewing interagency flows, odor assessment, inflow and infiltration analyses, lift station assessment, capacity analyses, system needs identification and capital improvement program development, flow monitoring, and satellite treatment plant siting study.

SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND INFRASTRUCTURE REVIEW

CITY OF VISTA I VISTA CA
Project engineer involved in the review of video data, coordination with City staff, and development of a 10-year capital improvement project, including assessment of the condition of the existing system and development of cost projections for replacements. It also included the assessment of future needs of the system based on current population projections.

WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN AND SEWER SYSTEM ASSESSMENT

CITY OF LA MESA I LA MESA CA
Project manager for this comprehensive sewer master plan. The scope included GIS integration, building and calibrating an XPSWMM dynamic wave sewer model to evaluate existing and future capacity, evaluating downstream conveyance facility capacity, and CIP development. In addition to the master plan, was also retained to perform a condition assessment of the city's sewer system and make recommendations for a sewer system maintenance and management program.

Over the course of 8 years, the entire city was videoed and a comprehensive CIP program was implemented. Designed more than 15 miles of pipeline rehabilitation and replacements through a four-phase program.

ON-CALL LAND-USE PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES*
ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS. PLANNED COMMUNITIES SECTION I ORANGE COUNTY. CA
Principal-in-charge for contract involving on-call development review services for the Orange County Public Works, Planned Communities Section. The first task order involves development of the 790-acre Tonner Hills project in northern Orange County. The second task order involves plan review for the Rancho City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 23

CARMEN KASNER, PE

TECHNICAL ADVISOR, QA/QC
all plans and associated technical reports for clarity, format, completeness, and conformance to the City's grading and roadway criteria, industry-standard design procedures, permit Mission Viejo (RMV) development in south, consisting of requirements, and conditions of development. Reviews include 14,000 residential dwelling units, 3,480,000 square feet of improvement, grading, and erosion control plans, sewer and non-residential uses, 1,220,000 square feet of business park, storm drain plans, hydrology and hydraulic reports, water and open space over the remaining 22,815 acres of the historic qual i
ty reports, geotechnical reports, structural calculations Rancho Mission Viejo. Plan check services include zoning and cost estimates. We are also assisting the City with the compliance, building and safety, public property, drainage and development of checklists, standard notes, unit price lists and WQMP compliance, landscape, grading, retaining walls, walls other documents to standardize and streamline the review and and fences, non-residential structures, electrical, plumbing, inspection process. and utilities. This contract involves staff augmentation at County offices for the acceptance of submittals, issuance of required permits, and plan checking services.

CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR

WATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
CITY OF OCEANSIDE VvATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT I

OCEANSIDE CA
Principal-in-charge providing support to the public relations team managing community relations services on a variety of projects that support the city's infrastructure improvement projects. They include water and sewer pipeline replacement projects, desalination testing and reservoir rehabilitation.

INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNICATION SERVICES
CITY OF OCEANSIDE I OCEANSIDE. CA
Principal-in-charge providing support for water and sewer projects involving road closures, detours, water shut-offs, property access, road repaving and night lighting/dusvnoise impacts. Efforts have included developing fact sheets, project update mailers, website content, door hangers, road signage, mailing list compilation, public meeting/open house planning and hotline management.

ON-CALL PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION AND PLAN

CHECK SERVICES

CITY OF BEAUMONT I BEAUMONT CA
Principal-in-charge for the review of as-needed private development projects and public works inspection services.

NV5 reviews all plans and associated technical reports
for clarity, format. completeness, and conformance to
the City's grading and roadway criteria, industry-standard design procedures, permit requirements, and conditions of development. Reviews include improvement. grading, and
erosion control plans, sewer and storm drain plans, hydrology and hydraulic reports, water quality reports, geotechnical reports, structural calculations and cost estimates.

ON-CALL PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION AND PLAN

CHECK SERVICES
CITY OF BEAUMONT I BEAUMONT. CA
Principal-in-Charge. Currently overseeing this contract involving the review of asneeded private development
projects and public works inspection services. NV5 reviews

QUAIL VALLEY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS

ALTERNATIVES STUDY

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT I RIVERSIDE
COUl'ITY CA
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) manager for the sewer improvements study. She reviewed and provided
guidance for planning and design of the sewer collection system. Failing septic systems in the Riverside County
community of Quail Valley (now within the City of Menifee) resulted in health hazards and water quality violations in downstream Canyon Lake. Completed the Quail Valley Sewer Improvements Alternatives Study in 2005 to evaluate feasible options for sewering the Quail Valley community. As part of the master alternatives study, the main area was divided into nine manageable subareas of similar lot sizes and residential (density) layout. After the study, phasing plans were developed for design and construction improvements, and the projects are ready to implement as funds become available. To maintain project momentum, Subarea 9 became the first project
subarea to be converted because it is the largest subarea and located closest to Canyon Lake.

SEWER REHABILITATION

CITY OF VISTA I VISTA CA
Quality Control (QC) reviewer responsible for the design of 300 no-dig rehabilitation projects that will be constructed in multiple phases. Review included evaluating the spreadsheet used to document video conditions of more than 500 sewer mains and confirm the appropriateness of the selected lines. Her efforts also included preparation of specifications and calculation of measurement and payment items to conform to the city's long term goals for this multi-phase project.

QUAIL VALLEY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ALTERNATIVES
STUDY

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY. CA
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) manager for the sewer improvements study. She reviewed and provided
guidance for planning and design of the sewer collection system.
* Project under previous employment
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 24

WATER RESOURCES

SAN DIEGO, CA
[email protected]

EDUCATION
MS, Civil & Environmental
Engineering, San Diego State
University
BS, Civil Engineering, San Diego
State University

EXPERIENCE
27 Years

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer,
California #71261
Arizona #52517

CERTIFICATIONS
National Association of Sewer
Service Companies (NASSCO)
Certification No. U06-16622
Society of Hispanic
Professional Engineers
Society of Women Engineers
Chi Epsilon Civil Engineering
Honor Society, San Diego Alumni
Association, Past President
American Society of
Civil Engineers
CYNTHIA S. PERAZA, PE
Project Manager, Sewer Master Plan and CIP
Cynthia Peraza has 27 years of experience in water, wastewater, and recycled water projects including master planning and design of capital improvements including water, sewer, and storm drain improvements. As a quality assurance/ quality control technical reviewer, Ms. Peraza has completed many improvement projects for various agencies throughout Southern California. She is familiar with the approval and permitting procedures of federal, state, county, and local jurisdictions.

Project Experience

ENCINITAS SEWER MASTER PLAN AND SEWER RATE UPDATE
CITY OF ENCINITAS I ENCINITAS. CA
Project Manager for the Citywide Sewer Master Plan Update and Sewer Rate Study Update. The Master Plan Update includes development of the City's wastewater hydraulic model using lnfoSWMM and integrating and verifying information contained in the City's GIS. Cynthia has worked closely with the Engineering, Public Works, and Operations and Maintenance staff to identify the City's assets that are at risk of probable failure and may become critical the City's planning horizon. Facilities identified as critical to system operations, such as specific manholes, pump stations, and assets located in environmentally sensitive areas, are being evaluated based on existing condition and capacity, current maintenance activities and frequencies, and input from City staff to establish criticality and risk of failure.

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
CITY OF ANAHEIM I ANAHEIM. CA
Project engineer. Assisted with performing a comprehensive review and evaluation of the city's current operations, policies, and procedures, and the various plans and programs that comprised the existing sewer system management plan (SSMP). To comply with the state's waste discharge requirements (WDR), Order No. 2006-0003 adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board on May 2, 2006. The city retained Atkins to review and evaluate the city's existing SSMP prepared in compliance with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board in September 2005 in compliance with the General Waste Discharge Requirements, Order No. RB-2002-0014. Assisted with the preparation of an audit and recommendations report that summarized the city's existing activities, policies, and procedures and provided recommendations for updates and/or revisions for compliance with the state's WDR requirements.

Assisted with conducting staff interviews of key staff, developing a comprehensive Operations and Maintenance Program, updating the city's Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response and Reporting Plan, and preparing a comprehensive and updated SSMP document to reflect current conditions as they pertained to the city's wastewater collection system and to achieve WDR compliance.

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF POMONA I POMONA. CA
Assistant project manager. Responsible for working closely with the city's Wastewater Operations Division to develop the mandatory elements City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 25
CYNTHIA S. PERAZA, PE

PROJECT MANAGER, SEWER MASTER

PLAN AND CIP
required to comply with the State's recently adopted
Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR). The elements,
collectively served as the framework for the city to
efficiently manage, operate, and maintain its 300 mile
sanitary sewer collection system. Duties included
interviewing wastewater operations staff, evaluating the city's existing policies and operations and maintenance procedures to identify requirements for compliance with the WDRs and develop an efficient and comprehensive
operations and maintenance program. Assisted with the
development of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow Emergency
Response Program, prepared a fats, oils, and grease
(FOG) characterization study, and developed a FOG
control program for the city.

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
COL NT'r Jr Af'-1 DIE:GO I '-Al\ DIECO C'\
Project manager. Worked closely with various agencies
including the County of San Diego, the City of Coronado, Anaheim, La Mesa, Pomona, the Rancho Cucamonga
Water District to develop the mandatory elements
required to comply with the State's Waste Discharge
Requirements (WDRs) and develop a comprehensive and
unique Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). As part
of SSMP preparation, documented the various activities
and programs currently implemented by each of the
agencies within their jurisdiction. Documented agency
specific policies and procedures and developed
recommendations for expanding program activities to
address the mandatory elements of the SSMP. Each
of the SSMPs included an Operation and Maintenance
Program; Design and Performance Standards; an
Overflow Emergency response Plan; a fats, oils,
and grease (FOG) characterization study; a system
evaluation and capacity assurance plan; a Monitoring,
Measurement, and Program Modifications component; a
Program Audits component; and a Communications
Program. Additionally, updated specific elements of
respective master plans to comply with the state's WDRs.

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT

AND IMPLEMENTATION
CU Al\l'Or--- A VI LL[Y WATER DISTRICT I RANCHO
Al\" Ct
Project engineer. Assisted with preparation of the
Cucamonga Valley Water District's (CVWD) Sewer System
Management Plan (SSMP) Development Plan
and Schedule, submitted in April 2007. To prepare
a comprehensive development plan and schedule,
assisted in the interview of CVWD's sewer maintenance
department staff and performed a thorough review
of the district's operations and maintenance policies
and procedures, municipal codes, and ordinances. The
development plan and schedule served to provide the
district with guidance for preparing a complete and
comprehensive SSMP for the district to comply with the
sewer requirements imposed by the governing agencies.

Assisted with the preparation of CVWD's comprehensive
SSMP to facilitate operation and maintenance of its 400- mile-long wastewater collection system. The SSMP will
include an overview of CVWD's goals and organization to achieve full Waste Discharge Requirements compliance,
an evaluation of the district's legal authority to enforce its collection system ordinances, a comprehensive fats, oils, and grease (FOG) control program, an updated Sanitary
Sewer Overflow Emergency Response and Reporting Plan,
and updated wastewater details and design standards.

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
,n or or � 'DO co�o� r o A
Project engineer. Worked closely with the city's Public Services Division to develop the mandatory elements of
the Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) required
to comply with the State's recently adopted Waste
Discharge Requirements (WDR) and San Diego Regional
Water Quality Control Board. Assisted in the interview of the city's Public Services staff and performed a thorough review of the city's operations and maintenance policies and procedures, municipal codes, and ordinances.

Assisted with the preparation of the city's comprehensive SSMP to facilitate operation and maintenance of its
45 miles of gravity and pressurized pipelines and
approximately 750 manholes. The SSMP includes an
overview of the city's goals and organization to achieve full WDR compliance, an evaluation of the city's legal
authority to enforce its collection system ordinances,
a comprehensive fats, oils, and grease (FOG) control
program, and an updated Sanitary Sewer Overflow
Emergency Response and Reporting Plan. Conducted
field inspections of the city's 16 wastewater collection lift stations and is assisting the city with development of Sewer Pump Station Standard Emergency Bypass
Procedures for performing an emergency bypass at
each sewer pump station which is integral for ensuring
the proper response to potential or actual sewer pump
station failures.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 26
)

WATER I INFRASTRUCTURE

SAN DIEGO, CA
[email protected]

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Engineering,
ITESM, Monterrey Tech, Mexico
BS, Civil Engineering, ITESM
Monterrey Tech, Mexico

EXPERIENCE
21 Years

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer, CA No.
67735
Professional Engineer (Mexico)
Cedula Profesional - No. 2760774
Certificate Urban Water
Management Plan Training

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE), Member

JULIAN PALACIOS, PE
CIP and Condition Assessment
Julian provides planning, engineering design, construction services and feasibility studies for water and wastewater treatment, water distribution, wastewater collection, and hydraulic modeling of water and wastewater systems. Julian has 21 years of experience completing water and wastewater infrastructure projects for local public agencies, including the City of Oceanside, City of Carlsbad, City of Vista, Vallecitos Water District, Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Ramona Municipal Water District and the San Diego County Water Authority.

Project Experience

EUCALYPTUS AND CITRUS AVE SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF VISTA I VISTA. CA
NV5 provided preliminary engineering design services for the Eucalyptus and Citrus Avenue Sewer Capacity Improvement Project involving the replacing and upsizing approximately 1,380 linear feet of 10-inch diameter Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP) to a 12-inch diameter PVC pipe along Eucalyptus and Citrus Avenues, between Civic Center Drive and Broadway in Vista. The existing pipe was identified as being capacity deficient during the latest Sewer Master Plan update. NV5 provided surveying and mapping, geotechnical engineering, and prepared a Preliminary Design Report to evaluate alternatives to replace the existing gravity sewer main. The project also included upsizing a segment within the Vista Magnet Middle School, requiring extensive coordination with the school district. Project challenges included developing alternatives and recommendations for crossing a storm drain culvert, reviewing hydraulic modeling results, reconfiguring two existing trunk sewers along Broadway to improve flow conditions and capacity, and a tight alignment corridor along Eucalyptus Avenue. NV5 is currently providing Owner Advisory services to support the City during final design and construction of the project through a progressive design-build delivery process.

LAKE BOULEVARD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF OCEANSIDE I OCEANSIDE. CA
Project manager. Project manager to prepare construction documents for a gravity sewer line replacement along Lake Boulevard and College Boulevard in Oceanside.

The existing gravity system utilizes an above-ground cast iron pipe supported by concrete pillars to convey wastewater across Buena Vista Creek and connects to a main trunk sewer pipeline. Over the years, the above-ground pipeline has been damaged by floating debris as flow in the creek increases during wet weather conditions. also contributed to accelerated significant interior corrosion of the cast iron pipe due to off-gassing. The project includes rerouting existing 8-inch and 12-inch gravity sewers, a 16-inch force main, and a 6-inch lateral from an adjacent senior community center, and reconnecting these pipelines to the proposed 15-inch sewer along Lake Boulevard and College Boulevard. NV5 services include surveying and mapping, hydraulic modeling, geotechnical investigation, environmental documents, coordination with the City of Carlsbad and Caltrans, traffic control plans for surveying and potholing, structural design of a concrete encasement for a shallow culvert crossing, preparation of plans and specifications for pipeline construction, review of closed caption television videos, and construction support services.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 27

JULIAN PALACIOS, PE

CIP AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT

ANNUAL SEWER MAIN REPAIRS
CITY Of IMF'le<IAL 8
.-ACf-i I MPERIAL LEAC'f-l Cf
Project manager. Project manager overseeing a citywide
condition assessment to identify, prioritize, and develop recommendations to reduce groundwater infiltration into the sewer collection system. The project included review of approximately 40,000-LF of CCTV inspection videos, identifying areas presenting infiltration at the sewer main vs. laterals, developing recommendations for addressing the deficiencies (remove and replace, chemical grouting, cured-in-place liners, point repairs), and prioritization of the recommended
improvements for implementation over the next several years Prioritization criteria included the structural condition of the sewer main, infiltration flow observed, location (public right-ofway, alley, easement, private property), traffic impacts, impacts to residents, and capital costs. NV5 will prepare construction documents to repair the sewer mains identified as the highest priority (Phase 1) to reduce infiltration into the City's collection system.

LILAC RANCH COMMUNITY
\ ALLEY El\ I U' ML I\ICI fl WATER DISTRICT I VALLE'!
[_
Project manager. Project manager to develop a preliminary design report and establish discharge permitting requirements for the proposed Lilac Ranch Water Reclamation Facility (LRWRF) for Valley Center Municipal Water District (VCMWD).

The wastewater treatment facility will serve the community of Lilac Ranch with a projected wastewater peak flow of 354,000 gpd and produce Title 22 recycled water for unrestricted use.

The preliminary design report required extensive coordination with the VCMWD and Regional Water Quality Control Board to establish waste discharge requirements, effluent storage, sampling protocols, and groundwater monitoring requirements.

The LRWRF will comply with VCMWD treatment facility
guidelines, and will include screening, influent pump station, equalization tank, extended aeration basins, disinfection, filtration, emergency storage, sludge treatment and handling, and an odor control system.

MESA VERDE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNn
Jr P \ [11S C � l\ \!:f?C,E t-,
Project engineer for preparing a Preliminary Engineering Report to evaluate and provide recommendations for improving the water system of Mesa Verde. Mesa Verde is an unincorporated community in East Riverside County, part of County Service Area No. 122. The study included evaluating the booster pump station, storage tank, hydropneumatic tanks, and water
distribution system. The report provided several alternatives and recommendations for addressing deficiencies
in the booster pump station and distribution system, and a preliminary cost.

MAIN LIFT STATION
1:L RO EL CE"JTRO ,A
Project engineer for preparing final design plans and
specifications for the upgrade of the City of El Centro Main Lift Station. The pump station serves about 85% of the City, pumps into a 5,000-foot long 30-inch diameter force main into the headworks of the wastewater treatment facility, and has a design flow of 5,000 gpm. The project includes upgrading to submersible dry pit pumps, providing staircase access to the pump room, installing a Bioxide odor control system, installing variable frequency drives and upgrading the controls and alarm system to tie into the City's SCADA system.

EAST SIDE LIFT STATION
ITY GF EL err 1TRO I EL C[NTRO CA
Project engineer for preparing final construction documents for the replacement of the East Side Lift Station. The existing pump station was built in the 1940s and has not been
upgraded since. The station will be replaced with a submersible type pump station with a design flow of 1,000 gpm, a 10-ft diameter wet well, valve vault, standby generator, and electrical and controls building.

LA BRUCHERIE LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN
T OF �•prr L MPEPII L C
Project engineer on the design of a regional wastewater lift station to serve future growth in Imperial, CA. The lift station will serve a total of 2,000 single- and multi-family units. The pump station is submersible type and incorporated space and additional piping for upgrading to up to three larger pumps to meet the ultimate flow condition. The design included 4,500- LF of 10-inch PVC force main, crossing of SR-86 following Caltrans standards, crossing of Union Pacific Railroad tracks, and connection to the Imperial Wastewater Treatment Facility headworks.

ESCALANTE RD LIFT STATION
'[' \I AL Ct..

Project engineer in the design of an onsite wastewater 370- gpm pump station serving the Canyon Heights subdivision, part of the Eastern Municipal Water District wastewater system. The design included site grading, two access driveways, provisions for adding a Bioxide odor control system, and structural and mechanical drawings for submersible pumps.
* Project under previous employment
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 28

WATER I INFRASTRUCTURE

SAN DIEGO, CA
[email protected]

EDUCATION
MBA, Business Administration,
University of California, Riverside,
BS, Civil Engineering, California
Polytechnic State University San
Luis Obispo
Foreign Study, Universidad de
Granada, Spain

EXPERIENCE
20 Years

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer,
CA #C66067
LEED Accredited Professional

JAMES OWENS, PE, LEED AP
Sewer Master Plan and CIP
James leads a variety of water and wastewater projects during the troubleshooting, conceptual design, planning, financing, and design phases. James is experienced in performing population and demand projections, hydraulic analysis and design, project, and system financial analysis, and planning and design of facilities. He has extensive knowledge of software tools such as AutoCAD, WaterCAD, SewerCAD, H20Map, Flowmaster, and MS Office.

James is fluent in Spanish and has had great success in acquiring funding for small and rural communities to improve their water and wastewater systems.

He has prepared numerous planning and design projects for CDBG, SRF, BECC, NADBank, Proposition 50, Proposition 84, and USDA for numerous communities along the California/Mexico border and elsewhere in Southern California.

Project Experience

LAKE BOULEVARD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF OCEANSIDE I OCEANSIDE CA
Quality Assurance/Quality Control. Provided QA/QC to prepare construction documents for a gravity sewer line replacement. The project included rerouting existing 8-inch and 12-inch gravity sewers, a 16-inch force main, and a 6-inch lateral from an adjacent senior community center, and reconnecting these pipelines to the proposed 15- inch sewer.

WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN

CITY OF BISHOP I INYO COUNTY CA
Project manager. Project manager for development of master plan for city's water and wastewater systems. Facilitated a project kickoff workshop to receive input from city staff on performance of existing system and vision for future. Led project team through initial inspection of wells, potable water storage facilities, and disinfection system. Led project team through inspection of wastewater pump station and treatment facility, including headworks, clarifiers, sludge pumping, sludge digesters, and sludge drying beds. Coordinated efforts to videotape and inspect 20,000 LF of six inch and eight inch gravity sewer pipeline. Led the evaluation of the City's water storage, distribution, and well infrastructure, and the wastewater collection system and treatment plant. Developed innovative solutions to bring the City's systems into compliance with future regulations and to address deficiencies in serving existing residents. Helped develop alternatives to reduce operations costs, including an automatic bill pay system for residents.

AVENUE 58 SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT I LA QUINTA. CA
Project manager for the design to relocate an 8-inch sanitary sewer pipeline from the Imperial Irrigation District's Avenue 58 facility to the Coachella Valley Water District gravity main along Avenue 58 in La Quinta. The gravity line replaced a pump station and forcemain. The pipeline alignment crossed existing parking areas, concrete walls, trees, and sidewalks.

MEADOWLARK WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY FORCE MAIN
VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT I SAN MARCOS. CA
Quality Assurance/Quality Control. Provided QA/QC for construction documents to replace the existing 12-inch asbestos cement effluent pipeline with a 24-inch City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 29

WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
c1� OF r OPT HLt E \"[ POR. I EI\IElv E

JAM ES OWENS, PE, LEED AP
SEWER MASTER PLAN AND CIP Developed master plan for collection system that collects CML&C welded steel pipeline. The new 24-inch pipeline will be wastewater from several communities, cities, and a naval base. located in a congested utility corridor, which includes a 12-inch Installed flow metering devices throughout collection system DI outfall sewer, a 10-inch techite sewer, a 24-and 30-inch DI to identify infiltration areas and wastewater flows throughout sewer, a 6-inch DI sludge line, a 2-inch water line, and overhead the entire service area. Worked to simplify system with several electric lines. The proposed pipeline will connect the effluent pump stations and force mains by recommending removal pump station with an existing 24-inch reclaimed water line of lift stations and conversion of force mains to gravity lines along Rancho Santa Fe Drive. whenever possible. Created preliminary design for three miles of gravity sewer and a metering vault at the main lift station.

Advised and worked with City's Alternative Selection Committee to determine the most appropriate and economical solution.

Performed financial analysis to determine to recommend most cost effective alternative. Analysis included finance options

COTTONWOOD CREEK PARK/MOONLIGHT BEACH

IMPROVEMENTS
,r U r-.. �, E l\i ,...,
Staff engineer. Staff engineer for hydrology and drainage improvements of the Cottonwood Creek/Moonlight Beach
outfall area. NV5 presented options for restoring Cottonwood Creek to a riparian environment with the objective of enhancing water quality. They also provided recommendations for
drainage improvements to convey selected design storms.

James oversaw construction of the park and the creek
enhancements.

HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS FOR LAND FALLOWING

PROGRAM
i:. C f [' c. R P '"' DE "
Owens' wrote report outlining potential effects of land management program in water transfer program to
Metropolitan Water District. Analysis included effects to groundwater levels, ground and surface water flows, water characteristics, and effects on the pumping and drainage infrastructure and the Colorado River.

WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN AND RATE
STUDY

T E E IPO
Developed water portion of master plan, including demographic projections, description and evaluation of existing facilities, identification of deficiencies, development of solution alternatives, evaluation and recommendation of alternatives, and development of Capital Improvement Plan. Gave several presentations to City staff, BECC, and EPA officials. Determined necessary rate changes to customers working with City staff to finalize capital improvements schedule, personnel additions, existing and projected debt service, and other expenses.

Determined revenue requirements for several financial
scenarios and selected one that satisfied City Staff, minimizing impacts to customers while financing necessary improvements.

Developed WaterCAD and SewerCAD of distribution and
collection systems with several growth scenarios to assist city in determining when, where, and how water network and wastewater collection system improvements should be made. and operations and maintenance savings from pump station removal projected over 20- and 40-year periods.

LUCERNE VALLEY WATER AND WASTEWATER

PRELIMINARY PLANNING DOCUMENT
\ [ \ A [P ,il"Y SA BE
Project manager. Project manager for preliminary plan of conceptual layout development for proposed water and sewer district east of Victorville. Researched and presented data on groundwater quality, existing facilities, and potential users.

Oversaw estimate of current water demand and wastewater generation, as well as projection of demands in proposed district boundaries. NV5 is in the process of identifying funding sources for development of district, as well as consolidation of existing water agencies.

WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY

ENGINEERING REPORT, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT
H P.K SHORES MUTUAL WATER COfl'PANY I
'- 0 MPO C/J.

Led the design efforts for three phases of water system improvements. Worked with California Rural Water Association and USDA to secure over $7M in funding to improve the
distribution system pipelines, water storage facilities, and water supply. The water company was faced with multiple significant problems, including high levels of nitrates and uranium in its wells, deteriorating storage tanks, collapsing pipelines, and causing insufficient fire flow capacity. There were also pipelines located in the residents' backyards making repairs and meter reading very difficult. He led the development of a PER and environmental documentation to permit USDA funding of the project. The proposed improvements included approximately 20,000 LF of 6" and 8" pipeline, rehabilitation of a storage tank, and a replacement of an existing storage tank.
* Project under previous employment
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 30

WATER I INFRASTRUCTURE

SAN DIEGO, CA
[email protected]

EDUCATION
MS, Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Cal Poly San Luis
Obispo
BS, Civil Engineering, Cal Poly San
Luis Obispo

EXPERIENCE
1 years

REGISTRATIONS
PE, California, No. 92150

AFFILIATIONS
National Association of Sewer
Service Companies (NASSCO)
Certification No.

U03-217-040-348
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE), Member
Chi-Epsilon Honors Society

JEROME WATTS, PE
Sewer Master Plan and CIP, Condition Assessment
Jerome's experience focuses on civil and environmental engineering in the water resources area. At Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, he performed laboratory work, including water quality analysis. He also managed a team of specialists to produce a set of plans, hydrology reports, geotechnical reports, traffic study, construction schedule, and construction phasing for the Marsh Street Bypass Culvert project. Jerome is proficient in AutoCAD, GIS, SketchUp, Visual Basic, MATLAB, Bluebeam, and Microsoft Office programs. He also has some experience in WaterCAD, StormCAD, FlowMaster, HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS, and XPSWMM.

Project Experience

SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN MODEL AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM

NATIONAL CITY I SAN DIEGO COUNTY CA
Jerome adjusted the existing model of sewer to reflect existing conditions. He ran the model with present and future conditions in 5-year intervals. This data, combined with an analysis of condition assessments, was used to determine the most efficient schedule to replace and or up-size existing pipelines. A capital improvement program report was made to declare these findings.

POTABLE WATER PIPELINE, USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION CENTER WATER COMPANY I SAN BERNARDINO. CA
Jerome provided environmental documentation coordination and prepared the application for the United States Army Corp. of Engineers Jurisdictional Determination and "no permit required" letter. He prepared easement letters and exhibits to request easements on various properties necessary for pipeline installation.

MANCHESTER AVENUE RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE
OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL ½ATER DISTRICT I ENCII\JITAS CA
This project involved the construction of a storage tank site, well, and installation of distribution pipelines throughout the system to remove dead ends and increase system efficiency. The water line replaced an existing ferrous line that failed three times during the design period. NV5 designed two segments totaling 2,500-linear-feet of new 12-inch PVC pipeline to replace the existing ferrous line in accordance with Olivenhain MWD specifications and standard details.

Two natural gas and one fuel line were crossed with fusible C900 pipe, which eliminated rubber joints to protect public health per the Department of Health Services request.

POTABLE WATER STORAGE TANK IMPROVEMENT DESIGN AND

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
ARROWHfAD VILLAS MUTUAL SERVICE COMPANY I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CA
Jerome prepared design drawings for two steel potable water storage tanks, each with a volume of 100,000 gallons. Examined property lines, street dedications, setback requirements for the site. Reviewed utility maps and rights of way for proposed off-site pipeline improvements. He prepared a conditional use permit application for the tank site, as the property is zoned residential, and the storage tanks would be a non-conforming use. Prepared a water quality management plan, examined nearby land uses and described the proposed improvements.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 31

WATER I INFRASTRUCTURE

SAN DIEGO, CA
[email protected]

EXPERIENCE
16 years

REGISTRATIONS/

CERTIFICATIONS
Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design Accredited
Professional (LEED AP)
Certificate Esri - Deploying and
Managing a MultiUser Database
(1/2017)
Certificate Esri - Implementing
ArcGIS Online (12/2016)
Certificate GIS - Mesa College
(2009)
Certificate Introduction to ArcGIS
I & II - Esri Redlands Campus
(2004)
URISA Leadership Academy
Certificate (2007)
Certificate Floodplain Boundary
Standards Training - FEMA (2007)
Certificate Mapping Information
Platform Training - SP14 (2007)

AMY STOREY, LEED AP
GIS Development, Atlas Maps
Amy has been working as a Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Specialist in the NV5 GIS group for the past 16 years. She provides services including geodatabase design, GIS web mapping and applications development, GIS analysis, data acquisition and conversion, project management through GIS MapBooks as well as drafting and Civil3D experience.

Project Experience

MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT STUDY OF DISTRICT

INFRASTRUCTURE & SURVEY OF BOUNDARIES
MIRACOSTA COLLfGE STUD'r OF DISTR1c·r I OCEANSIDE AND
E� CINITAS. CA
Lead GIS analyst for the creation and implementation of a GIS system for the district infrastructure for a three-campus college including base mapping, topography, parcels, easements, structures, and utility networks. All GIS data is hosted on a cloud-based GIS system to allow for easy access to data, photos, documents, records, etc. Tasks included design and creation of District Geodatabase, Mapping applications; conversion of all survey and base map data into the GIS; incorporation of web GIS system and linkage via the web map to the document library of over 5,000 plans into the GIS; web map development and application development; training of District staff on software and applications; and ongoing as-needed maintenance and updates to both the GIS and Document Management systems.

FEMA PROCESS AND GUIDELINES ADMINISTRATOR - COMMUNITY

GUIDEBOOK
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA1 I CALIFORNIA Created a guidebook which is now a FEMA standard for all communities in Region IX involved in a DFIRM Conversion. Guidebook includes project description, expectations, and data specifications, and all forms and information needed for communities to participate in project; lead in keeping NV5 GIS team up to date on FEMA's Guidelines and Specifications, as well as implementing Flood Hazard Boundary Standards and incorporating new Memorandums issued by FEMA project manager, FEMA DFIRM Conversions.

SDG&E ON-CALL GIS SERVICES

SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTY CA
Lead GIS Analyst for the conversion of survey data along the proposed Sunrise Powerlink Project in San Diego and Imperial Counties to be uploaded into the clients internal SDE Geodatabase. The project included conversion of AutoCAD layers to GIS shape file Format using Arclnfo 9.3 conversion tools, population of all required attribute fields in the feature class tables provided by SDG&E for the features were populated utilizing easement documentation, record of survey drawings, and preliminary surveys for the Sunrise Powerlink project study area.

NV5 also created a Polygon layer of all Parcel Ownership Boundary changes.

This layer reflects any changes to the current land ownership layer and includes attribute information to show the source of the change and level of accuracy to ensure uploads into the SDG&E land base cadastral fabric would be weighted appropriately. Coordinated with other contractors and SDG&E to create standards for the GIS deliverables to ensure seamless GIS data for the entire project area.

City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 32
,------------�- WEST -------------,1------------- �- COAST .;_;�Ci CIVIL

KYLE MCCARTY, PE, PMP, QSD, CQM

PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
Kyle is a principal engineer with 17 years of experience with planning, design, and construction of water/wastewater projects. He is an expert in hydraulic modeling and has prepared over 50 Master Plans in his career. He will serve as the technical lead for the hydraulic model development and calibration.

EDUCATION, LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
✓ Bachelors of Science, Civil Engineering, San Diego State University, 2003 ✓ Registered Civil Engineer, State of California, RCE 71510 ✓ Project Management Professional, Project Management Institute, 2184711 ✓ Qualified SWPPP Developer
✓ Certified Quality Manager, USACE / NAVFAC

WORKING WITH NVS
West Coast Civil is a minority business enterprise that routinely works with NVS on a wide variety of Projects in multiple roles including, prime, sub-consultant, and sub-consultant team member. Kyle has worked closely with NVS Staff over the years, including with your Project Manager Cynthia Peraza.

Highlighted below are a few recent projects Kyle has worked closely on with NVS. ✓ City of San Diego Public Utilities District As-Needed ✓ NAVFAC Small Business MACC
✓ San Diego Gas and Electric As-Needed Consulting
✓ City of Coronado Sewer Master Plan (with Cynthia Peraza at former firm)

SEWER MASTER PLAN EXPERIENCE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Kyle has Jed and managed more than SO master plans across the country, with over 20 sewer master plans in southern California, as presented below. In addition, Kyle is currently leading the model calibration efforts for the City and County of Denver with 120 meter and over 1,500 miles of sewer. ✓ East Valley Water District Wastewater Master Plan
✓ Rancho Cucamonga Wastewater Master Plan
✓ South Coast Water District Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Master Plan ✓ City of Chino Hills Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Master Plan ✓ City of Fullerton Basin 11 Wastewater Master Plan
✓ San Diego Sanitation District (7 Sewer Service Areas) Master Plans ✓ Rainbow Municipal Water District Water and Wastewater Master Plan ✓ Vallecitos Water District Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Master Plans (2008 and 2015) ✓ City of Coronado Sanitary Sewer Master Plan
✓ City of Poway Wastewater Master Plan
✓ City of Escondido Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Master Plan ✓ City of La Mesa Sanitary Sewer Master Plan
✓ City of San Diego Otay Mesa Trunk Sewer Master Plan
✓ City of Chula Vista Wastewater and Storm Water Master Plan ✓ City of El Cajon Johnson Avenue Trunk Sewer Relief and Consolidation Plan

GROWING COMMUNITIES
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 33

JEFF GARCIA
Industry Tenure
2002 - Present
Certification
NASSCO
Pipeline Assessment
30 hour OSHA
10 hour OSHA
Medical
Services First Aid
CPR
Confined Space
Awareness
Education
Bachelor of Arts
Boston College
Jeff is responsible for supervising all phases of condition assessment projects including oversight and training of office and field staff. Jeff has extensive experience working on Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study projects throughout the Western United States.

Jeff has over 19 years of sewer inspection experience and has experience in all phases of field evaluations. These include manhole inspections, sewer and storm inspections, flow monitoring, dye-test confirmation, smoke testing, building inspections, cleaning large diameter pipe, GPS surveys and data collection, public relations, field management, quality control and assurance, and safety training. He has his OSHA 10 and 30 Construction Safety Awareness, Medical Services First Aid, CPR and Excavation Safety Training.

Relevant Recent Experience
• Cleaning, Inspecting, and UV Spot Repairs of Truss pipe for San Bernardino County Special Districts.
• Closed-Circuit Televising Services of Sewer Mains and Manholes - Santa Cruz County Sanitation District (Large diameter pipe cleaning and inspection, IBAK SI Manhole MACP Level 2 Inspections)
• City Wide Sewer Line Cleaning, CCTV Inspection and Manhole Inspection - City of San Gabriel, CA (Sewer cleaning and IBAK mainline scanning)
• Large Diameter Storm Drain Rehabilitation - CalTrans, (Large pipe cleaning and inspection)
• Trenchless Sewer Repairs - Coachella Valley Water District (Used Cosmic UV system to install 4' spot repairs)
• Pipe Rehab with Sewer Laterals - LA County Sanitation Districts (dye testing, flow monitoring, cleaning, inspection, lateral bypass) • 75 Mile Condition Assessment - LA County Department Public Works (Clean and CCTV 75 miles of sewer pipe across multiple cities) • Sewer System Maintenance - City of Lynwood, CA
• CCTV Inspection, Citywide - City of Arcadia, CA
• Trunk Sewer Condition Assessment, LA County Sanitation District (Floating large trunk lines for cleaning/rehab)
• Sanitary Sewer Overflow Control Program Group 2-
Sewer Rehabilitation - City of Los Angeles, CA
City of Stanton I Sewer Master Plan 2021 NV5.COM I 34
NV5.COM | Delivering Solutions — Improving Lives Effective: 01/01/2021

CHARGE RATE SCHEDULE
Technical Services
Engineering Aide/Planning Aide __________________________________________________________ $80.00/hour Project Assistant ______________________________________________________________________ $90.00/hour Project Administrator _________________________________________________________________ $100.00/hour CADD Technician I ____________________________________________________________________ $100.00/hour CADD Technician II ___________________________________________________________________ $120.00/hour CADD Technician III ___________________________________________________________________ $135.00/hour Sr. CADD Technician/Designer _________________________________________________________ $150.00/hour Design Supervisor ____________________________________________________________________ $170.00/hour GIS Technician I______________________________________________________________________ $100.00/hour GIS Technician II _____________________________________________________________________ $120.00/hour GIS Analyst __________________________________________________________________________ $135.00/hour Senior GIS Analyst ____________________________________________________________________ $150.00/hour Environmental Consulting Technical Services
Senior Principal ______________________________________________________________________ $230.00/hour Principal ____________________________________________________________________________ $220.00/hour Senior III ____________________________________________________________________________ $195.00/hour Senior II ____________________________________________________________________________ $185.00/hour Senior I _____________________________________________________________________________ $175.00/hour Staff III _____________________________________________________________________________ $165.00/hour Staff II _____________________________________________________________________________ $160.00/hour Staff I ______________________________________________________________________________ $150.00/hour Associate III _________________________________________________________________________ $140.00/hour Associate II _________________________________________________________________________ $130.00/hour Associate I __________________________________________________________________________ $120.00/hour Specialist III _________________________________________________________________________ $100.00/hour Specialist II __________________________________________________________________________ $90.00/hour Specialist I ___________________________________________________________________________ $75.00/hour Project Analyst III _____________________________________________________________________ $195.00/hour Project Analysist II ____________________________________________________________________ $110.00/hour Administrative I _______________________________________________________________________ $70.00/hour Intern _______________________________________________________________________________ $65.00/hour Field Survey
1-Person Survey Crew (GPS) (Robotic) ___________________________________________________ $150.00/hour 1-Person Survey Crew _________________________________________________________________ $220.00/hour 2-Person Survey Crew _________________________________________________________________ $282.00/hour 3-Person Survey Crew _________________________________________________________________ $352.00/hour 1-Person Survey Crew*________________________________________________________________ $163.00/hour 2-Person Survey Crew*________________________________________________________________ $310.00/hour 3-Person Survey Crew*________________________________________________________________ $352.00/hour * Field rates are based on “Prevailing Wage” as determination by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR).

Rates are effective through December 31, 2021 as it may need to be revised as determined by the DIR. If contract assignment extends beyond that date, a new rate schedule will be added to the contract. Litigation support will be billed at $400.00 per hour.

NV5.COM | Delivering Solutions — Improving Lives Effective: 01/01/2021 Geospatial Services
Technician ___________________________________________________________________________ $75.71/hour Technical Specialist ___________________________________________________________________ $97.14/hour Technical Expert _____________________________________________________________________ $154.29/hour Pilot _______________________________________________________________________________ $114.29/hour Associate Team Leader _______________________________________________________________ $110.00/hour Field Manager _______________________________________________________________________ $144.29/hour Project Manager _____________________________________________________________________ $128.57/hour Account Manager ____________________________________________________________________ $235.71/hour Director ____________________________________________________________________________ $214.29/hour Professional
Junior Engineer / Planner / Scientist / Surveyor ___________________________________________ $125.00/hour Assistant Engineer / Planner / Scientist / Surveyor _________________________________________ $145.00/hour Associate Engineer / Planner / Scientist / Surveyor ________________________________________ $155.00/hour Senior Engineer / Planner / Scientist / Surveyor ___________________________________________ $170.00/hour Project Manager _____________________________________________________________________ $200.00/hour Senior Project Manager _______________________________________________________________ $225.00/hour Engineering Manager _________________________________________________________________ $245.00/hour Associate ___________________________________________________________________________ $250.00/hour Principal Engineer ____________________________________________________________________ $270.00/hour Principal ____________________________________________________________________________ $285.00/hour Community Outreach
Principal ____________________________________________________________________________ $295.00/hour Strategic Advisor _____________________________________________________________________ $220.00/hour Account Supervisor ___________________________________________________________________ $240.00/hour Facilitator ___________________________________________________________________________ $210.00/hour Bilingual Outreach ____________________________________________________________________ $210.00/hour Project Manager _____________________________________________________________________ $220.00/hour Assistant Project Manager _____________________________________________________________ $195.00/hour Integrated Marketing Specialist _________________________________________________________ $160.00/hour Media Relations Specialist _____________________________________________________________ $145.00/hour Stakeholder Outreach Specialist ________________________________________________________ $240.00/hour Sr. Community Relations Specialist ______________________________________________________ $165.00/hour Community Relations Specialist ________________________________________________________ $145.00/hour Environmental Outreach Specialist ______________________________________________________ $145.00/hour Project Coordinator ___________________________________________________________________ $125.00/hour Sr. Graphic Designer __________________________________________________________________ $175.00/hour Graphic Designer_____________________________________________________________________ $135.00/hour Videographer ________________________________________________________________________ $120.00/hour Bilingual Translation ___________________________________________________________________ $80.00/hour Administrative Support _________________________________________________________________ $95.00/hour Account Coordinator __________________________________________________________________ $110.00/hour Rate Setting
Rate Specialist ______________________________________________________________________ $180.00/hour Rate Manager _______________________________________________________________________ $260.00/hour NV5.COM | Delivering Solutions — Improving Lives Effective: 01/01/2021 Construction Management
Principal ____________________________________________________________________________ $265.00/hour Assistant Field Engineer (Non Prevailing Wage) ____________________________________________ $130.00/hour Associate Field Engineer (Non Prevailing Wage)____________________________________________ $155.00/hour Senior Field Engineer (Non Prevailing Wage) ______________________________________________ $170.00/hour Resident Engineer (Licensed) __________________________________________________________ $185.00/hour Construction Manager (Non-Licensed) ___________________________________________________ $190.00/hour Inspector (Prevailing Wage)* _____________________________________________________ $155.00 - $187/hour Electrical/Signal Inspector (Prevailing Wage)* _____________________________________________ $180.00/hour Construction Administrator _____________________________________________________________ $110.00/hour * Field rates are based on “Prevailing Wage” as determination by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR).

Rates are effective through December 31, 2021 as it may need to be revised as determined by the DIR. If contract assignment extends beyond that date, a new rate schedule will be added to the contract.

EXPENSES:

Plotting and In-House Reproduction ________________________________________________________ 1.10 x Cost Subsistence ____________________________________________________________________________ 1.10 x Cost Other Expenses - Including Subconsultants & Purchased Services through Subcontracts _____________ 1.10 x Cost GIS Web Hosting ________________________________________________________________________ 1.10 x Cost Mileage - Outside Local Area ____________________________________________________ Per Accepted IRS Rate Project Name: City of Stanton Sewer MP Update
Project Number:

Client/Owner: City of Stanton
Project Manager: Cynthia Peraza
Prepared By: Cynthia Peraza
Proj/Prop No.: P227521-0007406.00
Date: 1/3/2022

ITEM TOTAL
Labor $182,745
Outside Services $315,027
Direct Costs $1,493
(Direct Costs assumed at 0.3%)
TOTAL $499,265
$80 $141
$90 $166
$100 $183
$100 $193
$120 $198
$135
$150
$170
$193
$156
$277
$125 $340
$145 $190
$155
$170
$245
$275 EXPENSES:
$250 1.10 x Cost
$270 1.10 x Cost

1.10 x Cost $400

1.10 x Cost $20
$35
$400
$20
$35
0 1.10 x Cost
Per Accepted
IRS Rate
SURVEYING:

1.10 x Cost
Per Accepted
IRS Rate
Courier - Next Day - PSCN
Milage - Outside Local Area - EMIL
Subsistence - ESUB
Plotting and In-House Reproduction - EPHP
Structural Engineer - OSSTP
Manager - OSMP
Design Supervisor - OSDS
Senior GIS / CADD Technician/Designer - OSSCT
Principal - OSPP
Associate - OSAP
Engineering Aid/Planning Aid - OSEPA
TECHNICAL SERVICE:

OFFICE SERVICES:

GIS / CADD Technician III - OSCT3
Junior Field Engineer - FSJFE
Assistant Field Engineer - FSTFE
Associate Field Engineer - FSEFE
GIS / CADD Technician I - OSCT1 Senior Field Engineer - FSSFE Project Administrator - OSPAD
Project Assistant - OSPA
Other Expenses-Including Subconsultants &
Purchased Services Through Subcontracts - EOTH
Milage - Outside Local Area - EMIL
Courier - Same Day - PSCS
Courier - Next Day - PSCN
Litigation Support - ELIT

LABOR ESTIMATE

FEE SUMMARY

BASIC BILLING RATES
FIELD SERVICES:

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT:

CA Office: 15092 Avenue of Science #200, San Diego, CA 92128 Construction Manager - FSCM
Survey Manager - FSSM
3-Person Survey Crew - FS3P
2-Person Survey Crew - FS2P
1-Person Survey Crew - FS1P
1-Person Survey Crew (GPS)(Robotic) - FS1R
Associate Engineer/Planner/Surveyor - OSEEP
Assistant Engineer/Planner/Surveyor - OSTSP
Senior Engineer/Planner/Surveyor - OSSP
GIS / CADD Technician II - OSCT2
Junior Engineer/Planner/Surveyor - OSJP
PROFESSIONAL:

EXPENSES:

Plotting and In-House Reproduction - EPHP
Subsistence - ESUB
Litigation Support - ELIT
Courier - Same Day - PSCS
Other Expenses-Including Subconsultants &
Purchased Services Through Subcontracts -
EOTH
FILE: Fee Estimate_01032022-3_Flow Monitoring.xlsm

Page 1 of 3 ends
← All documents from this meeting