Agenda — Stanton City Council, March 8, 2022 (part 1 of 4)

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF STANTON AND TO THE CITY CLERK / SECRETARY:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting (Study Session) of the City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority for the City of Stanton is hereby called by the Mayor / Chairman, to be held on March 8, 2022, commencing at 5:00 p.m. at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680.

The Agenda for the Special Meeting (Study Session) is attached to this Notice and Call.

Dated: March 3, 2022
s/ Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk / Secretary
SAFETY ALERT – NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19

IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, IF YOU NEED SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT (714) 890-4245. NOTIFICATION BY 48 HOURS PRIOR

TO THE MEETING WILL ENABLE THE CITY TO MAKE REASONABLE ARRANGEMENTS TO ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO THIS MEETING.

The health and well-being of our residents is the top priority for the City of Stanton, and you are urged to take all appropriate health safety precautions given the health risks associated with COVID-19. The City Council meeting will be held in person in the City Council Chambers located at 7800 Katella Avenue, California 90680.

ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY DO SO AS FOLLOWS:
• Attend in person and complete and submit a request to speak card to the City Clerk. • E-Mail your comments to [email protected] with the subject line “PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #” (insert the item number relevant to your comment). Comments received no later than 5:00 p.m. before the scheduled meeting will be compiled, provided to the City Council, and made available to the public before the start of the meeting. Staff will not read e-mailed comments at the meeting. However, the official record will include all e-mailed comments received until the close of the meeting.

Should you have any questions related to participation in the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 890-4245.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 1 of 14 ends

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

SPECIAL STUDY SESSION AND JOINT REGULAR MEETING
STANTON CITY HALL, 7800 KATELLA AVENUE, STANTON, CA
TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2022
SPECIAL STUDY SESSION - 5:00 P.M.

CLOSED SESSION - 6:00 P.M.

JOINT REGULAR SESSION - 6:30 P.M.

PUBLIC HEARING – REDISTRICTING – 6:45 P.M.

SAFETY ALERT – NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 890-4245.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

Should you have any questions related to participation in the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 890-4245.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 2 of 14 ends

The City Council agenda and supporting documentation is made available for public review and inspection during normal business hours in the Office of the City Clerk, 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton California 90680 immediately following distribution of the agenda packet to a majority of the City Council. Packet delivery typically takes place on Thursday afternoons prior to the regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday. The agenda packet is also available for review and inspection on the city’s website at www.ci.stanton.ca.us.

1. CALL TO ORDER STANTON CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL - STUDY SESSION (5:00 PM)

2. ROLL CALL Council Member Taylor
Council Member Van
Council Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem Ramirez
Mayor Shawver

SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY

3. STUDY SESSION - NEW BUSINESS
3A. COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2022 RESULTS PRESENTATION BY

PROBOLSKY RESEARCH
To better identify the needs of our community and guide the City’s pandemic response, the Community Services Department solicited Probolsky Research to conduct and complete a Community Needs Assessment with an emphasis on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Probolsky Research will be presenting the results of the completed study.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the report.

4. ADJOURNMENT OF STANTON CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL - STUDY SESSION

5. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING (6:00 PM)
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 3 of 14 ends

6. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Closed Session may convene to consider matters of purchase / sale of real property (G.C. §54956.8), pending litigation (G.C. §54956.9(a)), potential litigation (G.C. §54956.9(b)) or personnel items (G.C. §54957.6). Records not available for public inspection.

7. CLOSED SESSION
7A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Title: Chief of Police
7B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Title: City Manager

8. CALL TO ORDER STANTON CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY JOINT REGULAR MEETING (6:30 PM)

9. ROLL CALL Council / Agency / Authority Member Taylor Council / Agency / Authority Member Van
Council / Agency / Authority Member Warren
Mayor Pro Tem / Vice Chairman Ramirez
Mayor / Chairman Shawver

10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

11. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
Presentation by the Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District sharing their mission with the City Council and providing information on their current operations.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 4 of 14 ends

PUBLIC HEARINGS (Heard out of order)

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS
13A. PUBLIC HEARING – CONSIDERATION OF REVISED CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES AS REQUIRED BY ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 21601 (REDISTRICTING)
Pursuant to Election Code section 21601, cities with by-district election systems are required to redraw their district boundary maps to ensure compliance with the California and federal Voting Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistricting requires a minimum of four public hearings and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority populations and communities of interest are aware of the redistricting effort and are provided with options to participate. The City held its first public hearing on November 23, 2021, its second public hearing on December 16, 2021, and its third public hearing on January 25, 2022. The deadline for Stanton to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare the action not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and will have no result direct or indirect to physical changes in the environment; and

2. Receive a report from staff and the City’s redistricting consultant on the redistricting process and review draft maps to redraw district boundaries; and

3. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and

4. Introduce Ordinance No. 1120 entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

STANTON, CALIFORNIA REGARDING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS,

ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES OF CITY COUNCIL ELECTION

DISTRICTS AND CONFIRMING SUCH REVISED COUNCIL DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES, AS REFLECTED IN THE ATTACHED MAP”; and

5. Set Ordinance No. 1120 for second reading and adoption at the March 22, 2022, regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 5 of 14 ends

12. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar may be acted on simultaneously, unless a Council/Board Member requests separate discussion and/or action.

CONSENT CALENDAR
12A. MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON THE

PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER READING WAIVED
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council/Agency Board/Authority Board waive reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.
12B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
City Council approve demand warrants dated February 11, 2022 – February 24, 2022, in the amount of $4,249,892.84.
12C. JANUARY 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT
The Investment Report as of January 31, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of January 2022.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 6 of 14 ends

12D. JANUARY 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY)
The Investment Report as of January 31, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Successor Agency find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of January 2022. 12E. JANUARY 2022 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; AND STATUS OF

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended January 31, 2022, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

2.20.080 (D) and is being provided to City Council. This report includes information for both the City’s General Fund and the Housing Authority Fund. In addition, staff has provided a status of the City’s Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) as of January 31, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund’s January 2022 Revenue and Expenditure Report and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended January 31, 2022.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 7 of 14 ends

12F. ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21

AND RELATED AUDIT REPORTS
Each year the City issues an Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), which summarizes the financial activity of a local government for a given fiscal year in accordance with financial statement presentation requirements prescribed by government accounting standards (Attachment A). The ACFR is accompanied by an opinion from the City’s audit firm. The audit firm’s opinion on the City’s 2020-21 ACFR is a clean opinion, with no exceptions, modifications, or qualifications. (The audit firm also issued a separate report for the Housing Authority’s 2020-21 audited financial statements. The report included in Attachment B also includes a clean opinion with no exceptions, modifications, or qualifications from the audit firm.) In addition, City’s auditors issue other reports in relation to the City’s audit. These reports are provided in Attachments C through E. (Attachment D, page 2 includes one recommendation that the City corrected during the Fiscal Year 2020-21 audit.)
There is one report that is outstanding for the Fiscal Year 2020-21 audit. The City’s auditors are currently completing the City’s single audit on federal expenditures in accordance with U.S. Department of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 for the 2020-21 fiscal year. The audit was delayed while the OMB was delayed in issuing its Single Audit A-133 Compliance Supplement the auditors utilize to complete the audit. This audit is expected to be completed by March 31, 2022. Staff will forward the audit report to the City Council when it’s available.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), and related audit reports.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 8 of 14 ends

12G. RENEWAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR VIRTUAL PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
Consideration of the circumstances of the state of emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic to determine whether remote teleconference meetings of the City Council, Committees, and Commissions can continue to be held under the provisions of AB 361.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency; and

3. Find that state or local officials have continued to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and

4. Direct staff, no later than 30 days after the City Council approves the recommended action, to report back on the state-proclaimed state of emergency so that City Council may reconsider the circumstances of the emergency, and, if appropriate, make findings to continue to hold virtual meetings of City legislative bodies pursuant to AB 361.
12H. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO J. KIM ELECTRIC, INC. FOR CITY

HALL NEW LIGHTING PROJECT
The City of Stanton solicited bids for the services of a qualified professional to replace the light fixtures and associated electrical work at the City’s Banquet Hall located at 7800 Katella Avenue. Normal usage throughout the years has necessitated replacement. A total of three (3) bids were submitted and opened on February 15, 2022.

Based on review of the bids and contractual documents submitted, City Staff recommends the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, J. Kim Electric, Inc., be awarded the construction contract.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Class 1, Section 15301(a); and

2. Award a construction contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, J.

Kim Electric, Inc., to provide professional lighting and electrical replacement services for the amount of $33,784.00; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and J. Kim Electric, Inc. in a contract to provide the services; and
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 9 of 14 ends

4. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders with J. Kim Electric, Inc., as needed and determined by City staff, for any contingencies up to a project total of $40,000.00.
12I. ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2021 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON,

CALIFORNIA
The 2021 Citywide Traffic Signal Equipment Improvements Project consisting of the installation of new traffic signal controllers, ADA-compliant push buttons, and cabinets with battery backup is now complete. The final construction cost for the project was $109,783.85, which was the contract award amount. The City Engineer, in his judgment, certifies that the work was satisfactorily completed as of February 1, 2022 and recommends that the City Council accept the completed work performed on this project.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare this project categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, and Section 15301c - Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities; and

2. Accept the completion of improvements for the 2021 Citywide Traffic Signal Equipment Improvements Project, as certified by the City Engineer, and affix the date of February 1, 2022, as the date of completion of all work on this project; and

3. Approve the final construction contract amount of $109,783.85 with Econolite Systems, Inc.; and

4. Direct the City Clerk within ten (10) days from the date of acceptance to file the Notice of Completion (Attachment) with the County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Orange; and

5. Direct City staff, after thirty-five (35) days has elapsed from the filing of the “Notice of Completion” with the County Clerk-Recorder, to make the retention payment to Econolite Systems, Inc. in the amount of $5,489.19.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 10 of 14 ends

12J. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2022-08 TO RESTRICT OVERNIGHT

PARKING ON MAIN STREET
The recommended resolution would establish no parking from 10:00 p.m. – 6:00 a.m., seven days per week, on the north side of Main Street from the alley between Flower Avenue and Beach Boulevard to Chestnut Avenue and on the south side of Main Street from Flower Avenue to Court Avenue.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council remove any existing time limit parking on Main Street; and

2. Establish “No Parking” hours from 10:00 p.m. – 6:00 a.m., seven days per week, on the north side of Main Street from the alley between Flower Avenue and Beach Boulevard to Chestnut Avenue and on the south side of Main Street from Flower Avenue to Court Avenue with a tow away enforcement provision; and

3. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-08 entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF STANTON,

CALIFORNIA, TO RESTRICT OVERNIGHT PARKING ON THE NORTH

SIDE OF MAIN STREET FROM THE ALLEY BETWEEN FLOWER

AVENUE AND BEACH BOULEVARD TO CHESTNUT AVENUE AND

ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET FROM FLOWER AVENUE TO
COURT AVENUE”; and

4. Declare that this Resolution will not have a significant effect, adverse or otherwise, on the environment pursuant to the California Environment Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); therefore, this resolution is found and determined to be not subject to analysis under the California Environment Quality Act of 1970, as amended, or the State CEQA Guidelines.
12K. AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION: FY 2021-2022 CITYWIDE

STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
The plans and specifications for the FY 2021-2022 Citywide Street Improvement Project are substantially complete. In the interest of time, the City Engineer is recommending City Council approval of the draft specifications and plans for bidding, subject to revision by the City Engineer and the City Attorney, to ensure a construction contract is awarded in April to comply with Orange County Transportation Authority requirements.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Class 1, Section 15301(a); and
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 11 of 14 ends

2. Approve the bid specifications and plans, subject to revisions required by the City Engineer and the City Attorney; and

3. Authorize and advertise for bids the FY 2021-2022 Citywide Street Improvement Project.
12L. DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE AND/OR ALTERNATE FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) 2022

REGIONAL CONFERENCE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Conference General Assembly will be held on May 5 – 6, 2022 at the JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa in Palm Desert, California. Each year, SCAG’s member cities select a Delegate and/or Alternate to represent their City to participate at this Annual Meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Appoint Mayor David J. Shawver to attend and serve as the City’s Voting Delegate for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Conference General Assembly.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Heard out of order)
Public Hearing item 13A will be considered at the beginning of the regular meeting agenda.

14. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 12 of 14 ends

15. NEW BUSINESS
15A. APPROVE THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS PROPOSED FOR THE MID-YEAR BUDGET UPDATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22; AND APPROVE A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY’S POSITION CLASSIFICATION MANUAL; AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY’S SALARY AND BENEFITS RESOLUTION During the course of the fiscal year, it is often necessary to adjust estimated revenues and expenditure appropriations in various program areas, projects, and funds. All of the proposed changes to the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget, including detailed explanations, are presented in Attachment A.

In addition to approving the proposed budget adjustments, staff is recommending City Council approval of the following:
• Amending the Position Classification Manual by adding and modifying certain job classifications (Attachment F); and
• Revising the City’s employee benefits and salary rates schedule to accommodate the change proposed in Attachment F (Attachment G).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. City Council approve the budget adjustments summarized in Attachment A; and,

3. Approve the changes to the City’s staffing plan, which include the reclassification of certain existing positions and funding two new positions to shift building inspection and building plan check services from a contracted service to a service provided by City staff; and,

4. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-13 amending the Position Classification Manual, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE POSITION CLASSIFICATION
MANUAL”, and

5. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-12 approving the employee benefit and salary rates schedule, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON,

CALIFORNIA, REGARDING EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND SALARY
RATES FOR ALL CLASSES OF EMPLOYMENT.”
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 13 of 14 ends

16. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC
At this time members of the public may address the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority, provided that NO action may be taken on non-agenda items.
• Members of the public wishing to address the Council/Agency/Authority during Oral Communications-Public or on a particular item are requested to fill out a REQUEST TO SPEAK form and submit it to the City Clerk. Request to speak forms must be turned in prior to Oral Communications-Public.
• When the Mayor/Chairman calls you to the microphone, please state your Name, slowly and clearly, for the record. A speaker’s comments shall be limited to a three (3) minute aggregate time period on Oral Communications and Agenda Items.

Speakers are then to return to their seats and no further comments will be permitted. • Remarks from those seated or standing in the back of chambers will not be permitted. All those wishing to speak including Council/Agency/Authority and Staff need to be recognized by the Mayor/Chairman before speaking.

17. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None.

18. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED BUSINESS 18A. COMMITTEE REPORTS/ COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY ANNOUNCEMENTS At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may report on items not specifically described on the agenda which are of interest to the community provided no discussion or action may be taken except to provide staff direction to report back or to place the item on a future agenda.
18B. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE MEETING At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future agenda.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk March 8, 2022

Page 14 of 14 ends

18C. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE STUDY

SESSION
At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future study session agenda.
• Update and discussion regarding steps taken to address homelessness within the City of Stanton and the resources being offered by the City.

19. ITEMS FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL/AUTHORITY COUNSEL

20. ITEMS FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
20A. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY
At this time the Orange County Fire Authority will provide the City Council with an update on their current operations.

21. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted at the Post Office, Stanton Community Services Center and City Hall, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 3rd day of March, 2022. s/ Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk/Secretary
City of Stanton
Community Needs Assessment 2022
Results Presentation
February 2022
Opinion Research on
Elections and Public Policy

PROBOLSKY RESEARCH
23 Corporate Plaza Suite 150 Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach
(949) 855-6400
Washington DC
(202) 559-0270
San Francisco
(415) 870-8150
Item: 3A
Click here to return to the agenda.

City of Stanton – Community Needs Assessment 2022
Survey Methodology*
*Due to rounding, totals shown on charts may not add up to 100% 1 Survey Details
Mode Phone (landline and mobile) and Online (email and text to web)
Language English, Spanish, Vietnamese, Mandarin, Korean, and Arabic Length 14 minutes (online)
16 minutes (phone)
Target
Respondents
City of Stanton residents
Survey Fielding January 24 – February 1, 2022
Survey
Participants
400
The sample was secured through consumer data. We called, emailed and texted residents. We matched the demographics of City of Stanton residents.

The sample of 400 residents was robust and yielded a +/-5% margin of error at a 95% level of confidence. The sample size was sufficient for statistically reliable comparisons among subgroups of residents (e.g., by demographic and geographic variables).

Sample
Interviews were conducted by phone (34%) and online (66%) modes. Phone interviews were conducted via landline (37%) or mobile (63%). Online participants were invited by email (50%) and text message (50%).

Respondents in all modes chose their preferred language, English (76%), Spanish (15%), Vietnamese (7%), Korean (1%), Mandarin (1%) and Arabic (1%).

The online survey was accessible by computer, tablet, and smart phone.

Security measures precluded individuals from completing the survey more than once.

Data Collection Explained
Probolsky Research in a Latina- and woman-owned market and opinion research firm with corporate, election, government, and non-profit clients.

Key Findings
• Homelessness is by far the leading issue of concern among Stanton residents, and they want it to be a priority for City decision-makers. • Most residents get their news about Stanton from the City through the website, cable TV channel, City Manager newsletter, etc. This is unique and stands out among other cities where they lack such a strong line of communication with their public. • Improving housing affordability in Stanton also a high priority that residents want City decision-makers to address. • There is overwhelming support for crime prevention programs and services to help crime victims and survivors.

Recommendations
• Take overt actions to address homelessness in the City. Promote these actions widely. • Take overt actions to bring housing affordability to City. Promote these actions widely. • Promote crime prevention programs and services on regular intervals. 2 3
35% say homelessness is most important issue
facing the City
Question 1: What is the most important issue facing the City of Stanton today? [OPEN-END RESPONSE]

35.3%

16.0%

10.5%

10.0%

5.3%

3.8%

3.5%

2.0%

1.0%

4.8%

0.5%

7.5%
Homelessness
Coronavirus/COVID-19
Housing affordability
Public safety/Drugs/Crime
Education/Schools/Higher education
Jobs/Economy
Transportation/Traffic/Roads
Healthcare
Government
Other
Nothing/No issues
Unsure
4 31% get their news and information about the City
through the City website
Question 2: Where do you generally get your news and information about the City of Stanton? Select all that apply.

30.8%

30.5%

23.3%

17.3%

14.3%

13.3%

10.0%

8.3%

8.0%

2.8%

8.0%

4.0%
City website
Facebook
Instagram
City cable channel
Word of mouth
City managers E-newsletter
Visiting in person
Twitter
Monthly general information reports
Stanton Express Mailer
Linkedin
Other
Unsure
5 49% regularly use Facebook
Question 3: Please indicate which, if any, of these social apps and websites you use regularly? Select all that apply.

49.3%

48.3%

37.5%

13.3%

11.8%

10.3%

9.8%

8.5%

6.0%

1.3%

12.3%

2.5%
Facebook
YouTube
Instagram
TikTok
Twitter
Snapchat
Linkedin
Nextdoor
Pinterest
Other
Nothing
Unsure
6 66% say homelessness should be the priority of
City decision makers
Question 4: Here is a list of issues that may be facing your community. Please indicate which should be the top priorities for City of Stanton decision makers? Select all that apply.

66.0%

44.5%

37.0%

34.5%

34.0%

31.5%

29.8%

29.5%

27.3%

25.8%

23.5%

20.3%

18.5%

18.0%

15.3%

14.0%

0.5%

3.0%

0.8%
Addressing homelessness in the City
Improving housing affordability
Managing traffic congestion in the City
Recovering from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic
Providing effective public safety services
Promoting economic development and job creation
Maintaining streets, storm drains, and sidewalks
Supporting local schools
Providing social services
Improving access to mental health resources
Maintaining public landscapes and parks
Providing effective firefighting and medical aid services Providing recreation programs and services for all ages Improving senior services
Improving childcare options
Providing cultural experiences and performing arts
Improving teen services
None of these
Other
Unsure
7 24% have experienced general mental health
challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic
Question 5: Which, if any, of the following setbacks have you or your family experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic? Select all that apply.

23.5%

22.3%

20.5%

14.5%

13.5%

12.5%

9.8%

3.8%

44.5%

1.5%
General mental health challenges
Difficulty in paying bills and/Or rent/Mortgage
Loss of employment/Income
Educational setbacks due to distance learning or school closures Distance-learning difficulties
Emotional distress due to a death or hospitalization in your family Economic challenges due to death or hospitalization of a household member Household change
Loss of childcare/Dependent care
Have not experienced setbacks during COVID-19
Other
8 39% have gone to family members for help for
difficulties related to the COVID-19 pandemic
Question 6: Where have you gone for help for difficulties related to the COVID-19 pandemic? Select all that apply. [IF CHOSE ANYTHING OTHER THAN “HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED…” TO Q5]

39.2%

32.4%

17.1%

13.5%

12.2%

7.7%

7.2%

6.8%

6.3%

5.0%

3.6%

23.4%

0.5%
Family members
Friends
Places of worship
County/State/Federal assistance program
Mental health counseling
City of Stanton – emergency food services
Local food banks
Non-profit organizations
City of Stanton – Family Resource Center Services
City of Stanton – Recreational Programs/Childcare
City of Stanton – Business Relief Program
Have not sought help for difficulties related to COVID-19 Unsure
City Programs
9 41% would like to see parks improved or expanded
in the City
Question 7: The City of Stanton received approximately $9 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds by the federal government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

These funds can be used to support public heath, address the negative economic impacts of the pandemic, invest in infrastructure like broadband Internet, roads, sewer, and water projects. The City is looking for input on how to better serve the community with ARPA funds.

Which of the following recreation opportunities would you like to see the City of Stanton improve or expand? Select all that apply.

40.8%

37.3%

36.0%

23.5%

23.0%

22.0%

3.5%

13.0%
Parks
Open spaces
Walking trails
Sports fields
Biking trails
Exercise equipment
Arts and cultural experiences
Other
Unsure
10 39% wish the City could expand or improve youth
sports
Question 8: Which of the following programs do you wish the City of Stanton provided, improve, or could expand? Select all that apply.

38.8%

34.8%

29.3%

22.3%

22.0%

21.3%

21.0%

6.8%

15.0%
Youth sports
Tutoring or educational opportunities
After school activities for students
Activities for older adults
Childcare
Teen activities
Adult sports
Other
Unsure
11 38% are concerned about access to affordable
healthcare services
Question 9: Which of the following health and wellness issues do you and your family have concerns about? Select all that apply.

38.0%

30.8%

27.0%

25.0%

20.5%

19.8%

17.3%

13.5%

1.5%

19.0%
Access to affordable healthcare services
Access to affordable mental health services
Availability of COVID-19 testing
Transportation to get groceries, healthcare, and medicine Access to healthy food
Meeting basic needs like household item and toiletries
Availability of COVID-19 vaccines
Wraparound programs/Case management
Other
Unsure
12 28% are currently experiencing an issue affording
basic household needs
Question 10: What, if any, of the following economic instability issues is your household currently experiencing? Select all that apply.

28.0%

27.0%

23.0%

21.5%

19.5%

1.0%

32.5%
Affordability of basic household needs
Ability to pay rent/Mortgage
Affordability of food and meals
Having reliable transportation
Finding sustainable employment
Other
Unsure
13 48% say the City should promote economic stability
for local businesses by hiring and retaining staff
Question 11: How, if at all, should the City of Stanton promote economic stability for local businesses? Select all that apply.

47.8%

41.8%

37.3%

26.8%

25.8%

21.3%

5.3%

3.0%

5.8%
Hiring/Retaining staff
Provide grants to small businesses
Provide revitalization funds to improve building frontage and parking Maintaining client/Customer base
Ability to pay for salaries, rent, etc.

Maintaining equipment
None of these
Other
Unsure
14 92% say it is important for Sheriff’s deputies to be visible on the streets to create a feeling of safety
Question 12: How important is visibility of Sheriff’s deputies on the streets when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

92.3%

7.0%

0.8%
Important Unimportant Unsure
15 Among those who said important, 60% said it is
very important
Question 12: How important is visibility of Sheriff’s deputies on the streets when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton? Very important

59.9%
Somewhat important

40.1%
Among those who said important
Very unimportant

21.4%
Somewhat unimportant

78.6%
Among those who said unimportant

92.3%

7.0%

0.7%
Total
16 Results by gender, age group and ethnicity
Question 12: How important is visibility of Sheriff’s deputies on the streets when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

92.8%

92.5%

60.0%

90.1%

90.4%

95.7%

93.5%

94.1%

91.7%

91.4%

75.0%

95.6%

88.2%

1.0%

0.5%

2.4%

1.5%

0.6%

2.5%

6.2%

7.0%

40.0%

9.9%

7.2%

4.3%

6.5%

4.4%

7.8%

6.2%

25.0%

4.4%

11.8%
Male
Female
Other
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
17 Results by District and survey mode
Question 12: How important is visibility of Sheriff’s deputies on the streets when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

90.4%

86.0%

95.1%

96.1%

91.8%

92.0%

91.7%

92.5%

93.2%

91.7%

1.2%

1.1%

1.0%

1.5%

2.4%

0.4%

0.8%

8.4%

12.9%

4.9%

2.9%

6.7%

8.0%

6.0%

7.1%

6.0%

8.3%
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Phone [NET]
Landline
Mobile
Online [NET]
Email
Text
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
18 Results by type of household and household
income
Question 12: How important is visibility of Sheriff’s deputies on the streets when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

95.1%

95.4%

97.4%

80.0%

85.2%

84.6%

85.2%
100.0%

63.6%

87.5%

87.2%

90.0%

96.3%

92.3%

96.3%

2.5%

3.8%

1.9%

9.1%

1.3%

0.7%

4.9%

4.6%

2.6%

20.0%

12.3%

11.5%

13.0%

27.3%

12.5%

12.8%

8.8%

3.0%

7.7%

3.7%
Own [NET]
Own a home
Own a condo or townhome
Own a manuf./Mobile home
Rent [NET]
Rent a home
Rent an apartment, condo or townhome
Rent a manuf./Mobile home
Other
Less than $25,000
$25,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999
$75,000-$99,999
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000 or more
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
19 Question 12: How important is visibility of Sheriff’s deputies on the streets when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

93.0%

95.7%

80.0%

60.0%
100.0%

93.0%

93.3%

91.7%

83.3%

85.7%

93.9%

97.1%

92.5%

90.9%

85.0%

88.9%

0.8%

1.1%

1.0%

0.5%

6.2%

4.3%

20.0%

40.0%

6.0%

6.7%

8.3%

16.7%

14.3%

6.1%

1.9%

7.0%

9.1%

15.0%

11.1%
Personal motorized vehicle single driver
Public transportation
Ride-share service
Walk
Bike
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Within the City of Stanton
Within the Orange County
Within the City of Stanton, self employed
Outside of Orange County
I am not currently employed
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by mode of transportation, employment
status, employment location
20 96% say crime prevention programs are important
when determining their overall feeling of safety
Question 13: How important are crime prevention programs when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

95.8%

3.5%

0.8%
Important Unimportant Unsure
21 Among those who said important, 62% said it is
very important
Question 13: How important are crime prevention programs when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton? Very important

62.1%
Somewhat important

37.9%
Among those who said important
Very unimportant

21.4%
Somewhat unimportant

78.6%
Among those who said unimportant

95.8%

3.5%

0.8%
Total
22 Question 13: How important are crime prevention programs when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

96.4%

95.5%

80.0%

96.3%

92.8%

95.7%

97.8%

97.1%

97.8%

90.1%

75.0%

98.2%

94.1%

1.5%

1.2%

1.4%

1.5%

0.6%

1.2%

0.9%

3.6%

3.0%

20.0%

3.7%

6.0%

2.9%

2.2%

1.5%

1.7%

8.6%

25.0%

0.9%

5.9%
Male
Female
Other
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by gender, age group and ethnicity
23 Question 13: How important are crime prevention programs when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

95.2%

95.7%

96.7%

95.1%

95.5%

94.0%

96.4%

95.9%

97.7%

94.0%

1.2%

0.8%

1.0%

1.5%

2.4%

0.4%

0.8%

3.6%

4.3%

2.5%

3.9%

3.0%

6.0%

1.2%

3.8%

2.3%

5.3%
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Phone [NET]
Landline
Mobile
Online [NET]
Email
Text
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by District and survey mode
24 Question 13: How important are crime prevention programs when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

97.1%

98.5%

92.3%

80.0%

92.6%

88.5%

96.3%

81.8%
100.0%

93.6%

93.8%

96.3%

97.4%
100.0%

0.3%

0.4%

2.5%

1.9%
100.0%

1.3%

0.7%

2.6%

1.2%

7.7%

20.0%

4.9%

11.5%

1.9%

18.2%

6.4%

5.0%

3.0%

2.6%
Own [NET]
Own a home
Own a condo or townhome
Own a manuf./Mobile home
Rent [NET]
Rent a home
Rent an apartment, condo or townhome
Rent a manuf./Mobile home
Other
Less than $25,000
$25,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999
$75,000-$99,999
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000 or more
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by type of household and household
income
25 Question 13: How important are crime prevention programs when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

96.3%

95.7%
100.0%

80.0%
100.0%

96.8%

83.3%
100.0%
100.0%

85.7%
100.0%

97.1%

95.0%

90.9%

95.0%
100.0%

0.6%

4.3%

0.7%

3.3%

1.0%

3.1%

20.0%

2.5%

13.3%

14.3%

1.9%

4.0%

9.1%

5.0%
Personal motorized vehicle single driver
Public transportation
Ride-share service
Walk
Bike
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Within the City of Stanton
Within the Orange County
Within the City of Stanton, self employed
Outside of Orange County
I am not currently employed
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by mode of transportation, employment
status, employment location
26 98% say programs addressing homelessness are
important when determining their feeling of safety
Question 14: How important are programs addressing homelessness when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

98.3%

1.3% 0.5%
Important Unimportant Unsure
27 Among those who said important, 69% said it is
very important
Question 14: How important are programs addressing homelessness when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton? Very important

68.7%
Somewhat important

31.3%
Among those who said important
Very unimportant

60.0%
Somewhat unimportant

40.0%
Among those who said unimportant

98.3%

1.3%

0.5%
Total
28 Question 14: How important are programs addressing homelessness when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

98.5%

98.0%
100.0%

98.8%

98.6%

96.7%

98.5%

98.9%

98.8%

75.0%

98.2%
100.0%

0.5%

1.2%

1.1%

0.6%

0.9%

1.0%

1.5%

1.2%

1.4%

2.2%

1.5%

0.6%

1.2%

25.0%

0.9%
Male
Female
Other
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by gender, age group and ethnicity
29 Question 14: How important are programs addressing homelessness when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

97.6%

97.8%

99.2%

98.0%

97.8%

98.0%

97.6%

98.5%

1.1%

1.0%

0.8%

2.4%

1.1%

0.8%

1.0%

2.2%

2.0%

2.4%

0.8%

0.8%
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Phone [NET]
Landline
Mobile
Online [NET]
Email
Text
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by District and survey mode
30 Question 14: How important are programs addressing homelessness when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

98.4%

98.8%

97.4%

90.0%

97.5%

96.2%

98.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

93.8%
100.0%

97.4%

98.1%

0.6%

0.4%

2.6%

1.3%

2.6%

1.0%

0.8%

10.0%

2.5%

3.8%

1.9%

5.0%

1.9%
Own [NET]
Own a home
Own a condo or townhome
Own a manuf./Mobile home
Rent [NET]
Rent a home
Rent an apartment, condo or townhome
Rent a manuf./Mobile home
Other
Less than $25,000
$25,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999
$75,000-$99,999
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000 or more
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by type of household and household
income
31 Question 14: How important are programs addressing homelessness when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

98.6%

95.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

98.2%
100.0%

91.7%
100.0%

85.7%
100.0%

99.0%

98.5%

90.9%
100.0%

97.8%

0.6%

0.7%

1.0%

0.5%

0.8%

4.3%

1.1%

8.3%

14.3%

1.0%

9.1%

2.2%
Personal motorized vehicle single driver
Public transportation
Ride-share service
Walk
Bike
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Within the City of Stanton
Within the Orange County
Within the City of Stanton, self employed
Outside of Orange County
I am not currently employed
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by mode of transportation, employment
status, employment location
32 84% say community engagement programs are
important when determining their feeling of safety
Question 15: How important are community engagement programs (i.e., “coffee with a cop”) when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

83.8%

13.5%

2.8%
Important Unimportant Unsure
33 Among those who said important, 48% said it is
very important
Question 15: How important are community engagement programs (i.e., “coffee with a cop”) when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton? Very important Somewhat important 47.5%

52.5%
Among those who said important
Very unimportant

42.6%
Somewhat unimportant

57.4%
Among those who said unimportant

83.8%

13.5%

2.8%
Total
34 Question 15: How important are community engagement programs (i.e., “coffee with a cop”) when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

86.7%

81.5%

60.0%

79.0%

83.1%

82.9%

87.0%

88.2%

81.1%

82.7%

75.0%

91.2%

70.6%

1.5%

4.0%

6.2%

1.4%

3.3%

2.9%

2.8%

2.5%

1.8%

11.8%

14.5%

40.0%

14.8%

16.9%

15.7%

9.8%

8.8%

16.1%

14.8%

25.0%

7.0%

17.6%
Male
Female
Other
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by gender, age group and ethnicity
35 Question 15: How important are community engagement programs (i.e., “coffee with a cop”) when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

84.3%

77.4%

83.6%

89.2%

84.3%

84.0%

84.5%

83.5%

87.2%

79.7%

6.0%

3.2%

0.8%

2.0%

2.2%

3.6%

3.0%

2.3%

3.8%

9.6%

19.4%

15.6%

8.8%

13.4%

16.0%

11.9%

13.5%

10.5%

16.5%
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Phone [NET]
Landline
Mobile
Online [NET]
Email
Text
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by District and survey mode
36 Question 15: How important are community engagement programs (i.e., “coffee with a cop”) when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

88.0%

89.2%

82.1%

80.0%

71.6%

73.1%

70.4%
100.0%

54.5%

87.5%

66.0%

80.0%

87.4%

87.2%

92.6%

1.9%

2.3%

4.9%

3.8%

5.6%

9.1%

12.5%

4.3%

1.3%

3.0%

2.6%

1.9%

10.1%

8.5%

17.9%

20.0%

23.5%

23.1%

24.1%

36.4%

29.8%

18.8%

9.6%

10.3%

5.6%
Own [NET]
Own a home
Own a condo or townhome
Own a manuf./Mobile home
Rent [NET]
Rent a home
Rent an apartment, condo or townhome
Rent a manuf./Mobile home
Other
Less than $25,000
$25,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999
$75,000-$99,999
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000 or more
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by type of household and household
income
37 Question 15: How important are community engagement programs (i.e., “coffee with a cop”) when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

84.8%

73.9%

60.0%

80.0%
100.0%

85.2%

80.0%

66.7%

50.0%

85.7%

87.8%

88.3%

88.9%

90.9%

50.0%

73.3%

2.5%

8.7%

2.5%

3.3%

8.3%

14.3%

2.0%

2.9%

2.0%

5.0%

2.2%

12.6%

17.4%

40.0%

20.0%

12.3%

16.7%

25.0%

50.0%

10.2%

8.7%

9.0%

9.1%

45.0%

24.4%
Personal motorized vehicle single driver
Public transportation
Ride-share service
Walk
Bike
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Within the City of Stanton
Within the Orange County
Within the City of Stanton, self employed
Outside of Orange County
I am not currently employed
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by mode of transportation, employment
status, employment location
38 84% say the visibility of graffiti is important when determining their feeling of safety in the City
Question 16: How important is the visibility of graffiti when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

84.3%

13.8%

2.0%
Important Unimportant Unsure
39 Among those who said important, 59% said it is
very important
Question 16: How important is the visibility of graffiti when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton? Very important

58.5%
Somewhat important

41.5%
Among those who said important
Very unimportant

43.6%
Somewhat unimportant

56.4%
Among those who said unimportant

84.3%

13.8%

2.0%
Total
40 Question 16: How important is the visibility of graffiti when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

87.2%

81.0%
100.0%

75.3%

86.7%

87.1%

85.9%

86.8%

82.2%

82.7%

75.0%

90.4%

76.5%

2.1%

2.0%

2.4%

2.9%

2.2%

2.9%

1.7%

1.2%

2.6%

5.9%

10.8%

17.0%

24.7%

10.8%

10.0%

12.0%

10.3%

16.1%

16.0%

25.0%

7.0%

17.6%
Male
Female
Other
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by gender, age group and ethnicity
41 Question 16: How important is the visibility of graffiti when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

84.3%

83.9%

84.4%

84.3%

81.3%

86.0%

78.6%

85.7%

86.5%

85.0%

2.4%

2.2%

1.6%

2.0%

1.5%

2.4%

2.3%

13.3%

14.0%

13.9%

13.7%

17.2%

14.0%

19.0%

12.0%

11.3%

12.8%
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Phone [NET]
Landline
Mobile
Online [NET]
Email
Text
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by District and survey mode
42 Question 16: How important is the visibility of graffiti when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

88.6%

88.4%

92.3%

80.0%

70.4%

69.2%

70.4%
100.0%

63.6%

62.5%

78.7%

83.8%

89.6%

79.5%

92.6%

1.9%

2.3%

1.2%

1.9%

9.1%

12.5%

0.7%

10.3%

9.4%

9.3%

7.7%

20.0%

28.4%

30.8%

27.8%

27.3%

25.0%

21.3%

16.3%

9.6%

10.3%

7.4%
Own [NET]
Own a home
Own a condo or townhome
Own a manuf./Mobile home
Rent [NET]
Rent a home
Rent an apartment, condo or townhome
Rent a manuf./Mobile home
Other
Less than $25,000
$25,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999
$75,000-$99,999
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000 or more
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by type of household and household
income
43 Question 16: How important is the visibility of graffiti when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

85.4%

82.6%

60.0%

80.0%

33.3%

85.6%

83.3%

66.7%

50.0%

85.7%

88.3%

86.4%

72.7%

80.0%

73.3%

1.7%

4.3%

33.3%

2.5%

2.0%

1.9%

1.0%

9.1%

2.2%

12.9%

13.0%

40.0%

20.0%

33.3%

12.0%

16.7%

33.3%

50.0%

14.3%

12.2%

9.7%

12.6%

18.2%

20.0%

24.4%
Personal motorized vehicle single driver
Public transportation
Ride-share service
Walk
Bike
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Within the City of Stanton
Within the Orange County
Within the City of Stanton, self employed
Outside of Orange County
I am not currently employed
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by mode of transportation, employment
status, employment location
44 96% say programs and services for crime
victims/survivors are important when
determining their feeling of safety in the City
Question 17: How important are programs and services for crime victims/survivors when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

96.3%

3.3%

0.5%
Important Unimportant Unsure
45 Among those who said important, 58% say it is
very important
Question 17: How important are programs and services for crime victims/survivors when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton? Very important

58.2%
Somewhat important

41.8%
Among those who said important
Very unimportant

30.8%
Somewhat unimportant

69.2%
Among those who said unimportant

96.3%

3.3%

0.5%
Total
46 Question 17: How important are programs and services for crime victims/survivors when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

96.9%

96.0%

80.0%

98.8%

95.2%

95.7%

97.8%

94.1%

96.7%

96.3%

75.0%

98.2%

88.2%

1.0%

2.9%

1.1%

3.1%

3.0%

20.0%

1.2%

4.8%

4.3%

2.2%

2.9%

2.2%

3.7%

25.0%

1.8%

11.8%
Male
Female
Other
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by gender, age group and ethnicity
47 Question 17: How important are programs and services for crime victims/survivors when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

95.2%

93.5%

97.5%

98.0%

95.5%

94.0%

96.4%

96.6%

95.5%

97.7%

0.8%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

1.2%

4.8%

6.5%

1.6%

1.0%

3.0%

4.0%

2.4%

3.4%

4.5%

2.3%
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
Phone [NET]
Landline
Mobile
Online [NET]
Email
Text
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by District and survey mode
48 Question 17: How important are programs and services for crime victims/survivors when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

97.1%

98.1%

89.7%
100.0%

92.6%

88.5%

96.3%
100.0%

87.5%

91.5%

96.3%

97.8%

94.9%

98.1%

2.5%

1.9%
100.0%

12.5%

1.3%

2.9%

1.9%

10.3%

4.9%

11.5%

1.9%

8.5%

2.5%

2.2%

5.1%

1.9%
Own [NET]
Own a home
Own a condo or townhome
Own a manuf./Mobile home
Rent [NET]
Rent a home
Rent an apartment, condo or townhome
Rent a manuf./Mobile home
Other
Less than $25,000
$25,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999
$75,000-$99,999
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000 or more
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
Results by type of household and household
income
49 Results by mode of transportation, employment
status, employment location
Question 17: How important are programs and services for crime victims/survivors when determining your overall feeling of safety in the City of Stanton?

96.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

96.5%

93.3%
100.0%
100.0%

71.4%

98.0%

98.1%

97.5%

81.8%

85.0%

97.8%

0.3%

0.4%

14.3%

1.0%

2.2%

3.4%

3.2%

6.7%

14.3%

2.0%

1.0%

2.5%

18.2%

15.0%
Personal motorized vehicle single driver
Public transportation
Ride-share service
Walk
Bike
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Within the City of Stanton
Within the Orange County
Within the City of Stanton, self employed
Outside of Orange County
I am not currently employed
Important
Unsure
Unimportant
Important Unimportant
50 Addressing homelessness was mentioned as an
issue not discussed in the survey
Question 18: Is there anything that didn’t come up in this survey that you would like to share about your needs, your family’s needs, or how the City of Stanton might be able to help you? Remember, your answers are confidential.
[OPEN-END RESPONSE]

5.8%

3.8%

2.8%

2.5%

2.0%

1.5%

4.8%

61.0%

16.0%
Addressing homelessness
Crime/Public safety (more police patrols/Better enforcement) Parking enforcement/Infrastructure
Allocation of community resources
Blight/Graffiti/Dumping
Rent relief/Rent control
Other
Nothing/No
Unsure
51 Ethnicity
Question 19: For demographic purposes only, which of the following best describes your ethnic background?

45.0%

20.3%

2.0%

28.5%

2.3%

2.0%
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Prefer not to answer
52 Gender
Question 20: Which of the following best describes you?

48.8%

50.0%

0.8%

0.5%
Male
Female
Other
Prefer not to answer
53 Age group
Question 21: Which age group describes you?

20.3%

20.8%

17.5%

23.0%

17.0%

1.5%
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Prefer not to answer
54 Age category of individuals living in household
Question 22: Please indicate each age category that is inclusive of individuals living in your household.

8.0%

19.0%

15.5%

31.5%

21.3%

19.0%

25.5%

20.0%

5.0%
0-3
4 to 10
11 to 17
18 to 29
30 to 39
40 to 49
50 to 64
65+
Prefer not to answer
55 Individuals ages in household
Question 23: Please indicate how many individuals living in your household are ages 0-3, 4-10, 11-17, 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-64, 65+

81.3%

12.5%

3.1%

3.1%
1 2
3 4
0 to 3

64.5%

25.0%

9.2%

1.3%
1 2
3 4
4 to 10

50.0%

33.9%

12.9%

3.2%
1 2
3 4
11 to 17

40.5%

42.9%

11.1%

4.8%

0.8%
1 2
3 4
5 18 to 29

42.4%

52.9%

2.4%

2.4%
1 2
3 4
30 to 39

43.4%

53.9%

1.3%

1.3%
1 2
3 4
40 to 49

32.4%

64.7%

2.9%
1 2
3 50 to 64

36.3%

61.3%

2.5%
1 2
3 65+
56 Primary language spoken in household
Question 24: What language is primarily spoken in your household?

77.0%

8.3%

7.3%

2.5%

1.3%

1.0%

0.8%

2.0%
English
Spanish
Vietnamese
Korean
Mandarin
Arabic
Other
Prefer not to answer
57 Languages spoken in household
Question 25: What other languages are spoken in your household?

27.6%

19.9%

10.5%

2.6%

0.3%

1.8%

34.9%

1.3%
Spanish
English
Vietnamese
Mandarin
Korean
Arabic
Other
None
Prefer not to answer
58 Household Type
Question 26: Do you rent or own your home, condo, townhome, or mobile home?

77.0%

64.8%

9.8%

2.5%

20.3%

6.5%

13.5%

0.3%

0.5%

2.3%
Own [NET]
Own a home
Own a condo or townhome
Own a manufactured/Mobile home
Rent [NET]
Rent a home
Rent an apartment, condo, or townhome
Rent a manufactured/Mobile home
Other
Prefer not to answer
59 Household Income
Question 27: Combining all persons living in your household, which of the following best describes your household's annual income?

2.0%

11.8%

20.0%

33.8%

9.8%

13.5%

9.3%
Less than $25,000
$25,000 - $49,999
$50,000 - $74,999
$75,000 - $99,999
$100,000 - $149,999
$150,000 or more
Prefer not to answer
60 Method of Transportation
Question 28: What is your primary means or method of transportation?

89.0%

5.8%

1.3%

0.8%

0.5%

1.5%
Personal motorized vehicle (e.g. Car, van, motorcycle) single driver Public transportation (e.g. Train, trolley, bus)
Ride-share service (e.g. Uber, Lyft)
Walk
Bike
Other
Prefer not to answer
61 Employment Status
Question 29: Which of the following best describes your employment status?

71.0%

7.5%

3.0%

1.5%

1.8%

12.3%

1.5%

1.5%
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Other
Prefer not to answer
62 Employment Location
Question 30: Which of the following best describes your employment location?

25.8%

49.8%

2.8%

5.0%

11.3%

3.8%

1.8%
Working within the City of Stanton
Working within the Orange County
Working within the City of Stanton, self employed
Working outside of Orange County
I am not currently employed
Other
Prefer not to answer
63 Demographics
64 Gender Age group
Ethnicity
Respondent demographics by gender, age group, method of transportation, HH income, ethnicity, survey mode, primary language and languages in HH

34.0%

37.0%

63.0%

66.0%

50.0%

50.0%
Phone
[NET]
Landline
Mobile
Online
[NET]
Email
Text
Survey Mode Primary Language
Method of Transportation

76.0%

15.0%

7.0%

1.0%

1.0%
English
Spanish
Vietnamese
Korean
Mandarin
Arabic

48.8%

50.0%

0.8%

0.5%
Male
Female
Other
Prefer not to
answer

20.3%

20.8%

17.5%

23.0%

17.0%

1.5%
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Prefer not to answer

89.0%

5.8%

1.3%

0.8%

0.5%

1.5%
Personal motorized vehicle (e.g.…
Public transportation (e.g. Train,…
Ride-share service (e.g. Uber, lyft)
Walk
Bike
Other
Prefer not to answer

45.0%

20.3%

2.0%

28.5%

2.3%

2.0%
Latino/Hispanic
White/Caucasian
Black/African American
Asian/Pacific Islander
Other
Prefer not to answer

2.0%

11.8%

20.0%

33.8%

9.8%

13.5%

9.3%
Less than $25,000
$25,000 - $49,999
$50,000 - $74,999
$75,000 - $99,999
$100,000 - $149,999
$150,000 or more
Prefer not to answer
Household Income

27.6%

19.9%

10.5%

2.6%

0.3%

1.8%

34.9%

1.3%
Spanish
English
Vietnamese
Mandarin
Korean
Arabic
Other
None
Prefer not to answer
Languages in Household
65 Respondent demographics by employment status, employment location and household type
Employment Status

71.0%

7.5%

3.0%

1.5%

1.8%

12.3%

1.5%

1.5%
Employed, full-time
Employed, part-time
Not employed, looking for work
Not employed, not looking for work
Disabled, not able to work
Retired
Other
Prefer not to answer

25.8%

49.8%

2.8%

5.0%

11.3%

3.8%

77.0%

64.8%

9.8%

2.5%

20.3%

6.5%

13.5%

0.3%

0.5%

PROBOLSKY RESEARCH
23 Corporate Plaza Suite 150 Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach
(949) 855-6400
Washington DC
(202) 559-0270
Opinion Research on
Elections and Public Policy
Questions?
Scarlett Isayo, Research Director
O: 949-855-6400
Adam Probolsky, President
O: 949-855-6400 | M: 949-697-6726
E: [email protected]
San Francisco
(415) 870-8150
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
DATE: March 8, 2022
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REVISED CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES AS REQUIRED BY ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 21601
REPORT IN BRIEF:

Pursuant to Election Code section 21601, cities with by-district election systems are required to redraw their district boundary maps to ensure compliance with the California and federal Voting Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistricting requires a minimum of four public hearings and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority populations and communities of interest are aware of the redistricting effort and are provided with options to participate. The City held its first public hearing on November 23, 2021, its second public hearing on December 16, 2021, and its third public hearing on January 25, 2022. The deadline for Stanton to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Receive a report from staff and the City’s redistricting consultant on the redistricting process and review draft maps to redraw district boundaries; and

3. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and

4. Introduce Ordinance No. 1120 entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON,

CALIFORNIA REGARDING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS, ADJUSTING THE

BOUNDARIES OF CITY COUNCIL ELECTION DISTRICTS AND

CONFIRMING SUCH REVISED COUNCIL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, AS REFLECTED IN THE ATTACHED MAP”; and

5. Set Ordinance No. 1120 for second reading and adoption at the March 22, 2022, regularly scheduled City Council meeting.

Item: 13A
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 BACKGROUND:

Every 10 years, cities with by-district election systems must use new data from the Census to review and, if needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. This process, called redistricting, ensures that all districts have a nearly equal population. The redistricting process for the City of Stanton must be completed by April 17, 2022.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

The City adopted its current district boundaries in 2017, following the transition to districtbased elections and based on 2010 census data as required by law. The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020.

Under the Act, the City Council shall draw and adopt boundaries using the following criteria in the listed order of priority (Elections Code 21621(c)):

1. Comply with the federal requirements of equal population and the Voting Rights Act.

2. Be geographically contiguous.

3. Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together).

4. Display easily identifiable boundaries.

5. Be compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people).

6. Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party.

Once the prioritized criteria are met, other traditional districting principles can be considered, such as:

1. Minimize the number of voters delayed from voting in 2022 to 2024.

2. Respect voters’ choices/continuity in office.

3. Future population growth.

By law, the City must hold at least four public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps:
• At least one hearing must occur before the city or county draws draft maps. • At least two hearings must happen after the drawing of draft maps. The fourth hearing can happen either before or after the drawing of draft maps. • City or county staff or consultants may hold a public workshop instead of one of the required public redistricting hearings.

To increase the accessibility of these hearings, cities and counties must take the following steps:
3 • At least one hearing must occur on a Saturday, Sunday, or after 6:00 p.m. on a weekday.
• If a redistricting hearing is consolidated with another local government meeting, the redistricting hearing must be begin at a pre-designated time. • Local public redistricting hearings must be made accessible with people with disabilities.

Analysis of the City’s current district boundaries, adjusted for the 2020 Census data, shows the districts no longer remain population-balanced. The City’s population is 38,191. The ideal district population is one-fourth of that number, or 9,547.

Determining population balance is done by measuring the spread, or deviation, between the least populated district and the greatest populated district. Deviations of 10% or less are generally considered acceptable under U.S. Supreme Court rulings on equal protection.

The current population of District 2 is measurably over the ideal at -6.74% while District 3 is considerably under the ideal at 8.15%. Combined, those deviations bring the City’s current total deviation to 14.89%. As such, the district boundaries must be adjusted to achieve a population balance with less than a 10% deviation.

Another consideration is the distribution of minority voters throughout the City, and whether there is a possibility of creating a majority/minority voting district as required under the federal Voting Rights Act. This analysis involves reviewing the ethnicity demographics from the census data, specifically citizens of voting age populations (CVAP). Upon review of the City’s CVAP data, creation of a majority/minority voting district (a district in which an identified minority comprises the majority of voting age population) is not possible, given the total population of minority voters and the dispersed nature of their residencies.

Currently, in Districts 1, 2 and 4, Asian citizens of voting age comprise the single highest demographic, but do not constitute 50%+1 of the CVAP population. District 3 exhibits similar demographics for Hispanic citizens of voting age. Therefore, they cannot be classified as true majority/minority voting district. Previous presentations have suggested that the current map, and the draft map options exhibited and/or preserved majority/minority voting districts. Upon further analysis, and recognizing that a majority/minority voting district must comprise 50%+1 of a single identified minority, the existing and proposed draft maps do not create majority/minority voting districts. The demographic analysts have attempted several configurations to identify if a majority/minority voting district can be drawn, and have determined that no such option exists.

The purpose of this public hearing is to review draft maps, to inform the public about the districting process, and to hear from the community on factors that must be taken into consideration for district boundaries. The public is requested to provide input regarding communities of interest and other local factors that should be considered for district maps.

A community of interest under the relevant Elections Code for cities (Section 21621(c) is, “a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.” 4 Possible features defining community of interest might include, but are not limited to:

1. School attendance areas;

2. Natural dividing lines such as major roads, hills, or highways;

3. Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks;

4. Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and

5. Shared demographic characteristics, such as:
• Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic insolation; • Languages spoken at home; and
• Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas.

The City’s current district boundary map is illustrated below:

The City’s redistricting consultant initially prepared two draft map options for the Council’s consideration (Options A and B). In addition, members of the public submitted three draft map options immediately prior to the third public hearing (Options C-E). At the third hearing Council requested that the City’s demographic consultant attempt to revise Map Option C to achieve greater compactness, which is now presented as Option Cv2. Each of the maps are summarized below, and accompanying demographic information may be found attached to this report (Attachment 1). Further, an online tool for closely examining the boundaries, with zoom and search capabilities, may be found via link below:

Link:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1yVjEOtCAa9yiVyGla3I0414122o3pMjr&ll =33.79475358095724%2C-117.9928815&z=14
5 Previously Reviewed Maps
Map Option A
Map Option A is a population balance adjustment and preserves the core of the existing districts while at the same correcting the non-contiguous islands found in Districts 1, 3 and 4 (no longer permitted under the Fair Maps Act). Option A exhibits a deviation of 2.57%, as compared to the current deviation of 14.89%. Option A also recognizes communities of interest surrounding the Stanton Family Resource Center and the Crosspointe Village neighborhood. Option A does not draw any majority/minority voting district. The map moves populations across voting cycles, resulting in 4,356 people currently scheduled to vote in 2022 being deferred to voting in 2024. A complete demographic analysis is attached to this report.

Map Option B
Map Option B is similar to Option A, particularly in Districts 1 and 2. The map also resembles the City’s current district map with respect to the portion of District 4 east of Beach Boulevard. Like Option A, it also corrects the three non-contiguous islands in the City’s current plan. Option B exhibits a total deviation of 5.75%, moving smaller populations than Option A. At Council’s direction, Option B also maintains the communities of interest surrounding the Stanton Family Resource Center and Crosspointe Village into single voting districts. The map does not draw any majority/minority voting district. The map moves populations across voting cycles, resulting in 3,371 people currently scheduled to vote in 2022 being deferred to voting in 2024. A complete demographic analysis is attached to this report
Map Option C
Option C was submitted by a member of the public. The map is population balanced and exhibits a total deviation of 8.48%. Like Options A and B, Option C corrects the noncontiguous islands in the City’s current plan, and creates compact voting districts. While there is some deviation from the City’s current map, Option C does preserve the core of the City’s existing districts. The map does not draw any majority/minority voting district. The map moves populations across voting cycles, resulting in 4,729 people currently scheduled to vote in 2022 being deferred to voting in 2024. A complete demographic analysis is attached to this report.

Map Option D
Option D is population balanced, with a deviation of 2.74%. The map creates compact, contiguous voting districts, but does not preserve the core of the existing districts as it is a significant change from the current district map. Further, it moves substantial population throughout the City, resulting in approximately 7,200 people currently scheduled to vote in 2022 being deferred to voting in 2024. A complete demographic analysis is attached to this report.
6 Map Option E
Option D is not population balanced, with an approximate deviation of 49.49%. The map exhibits a five district plan, in comparison to the City’s current four district plan with directly elected Mayor. The map could not be replicated as drawn by the submitter, as the map split multiple census blocks. The City’s consultant approximated the map to obtain the preliminary demographic data. If the Council were interested in examining Option E further, the consultant will perform a more in depth analysis of the blocks that would need to be split, in order to obtain the accurate demographic data. Adoption of a five district plan may not be done through the redistricting effort, however, as elimination of a directly elected Mayor requires a ballot initiative to be approved by the electorate.

New Map
Map Option Cv2
Option Cv2 is a revision by the City’s demographic consultant to Option C, submitted by a member of the public. The revision attempted to correct some irregular census block placements to create a more compact map. Specifically, the neighborhood north of Orangewood, and bounded by Jane Way and Pine Tree Way, was moved into District 3 to avoid splitting a community of interest and to improve the map’s compactness. The irregularly shaped census block adjacent to the abandoned rail right-of-way was also examined, and should the Council select Option Cv2, that census block will be manually split for aesthetic reasons, placing the area into District 2. The map is population balanced, with a deviation of 9.49%. The map creates compact, contiguous voting districts. Like the previous options, the map does not draw any majority/minority voting district. The map moves population across voting cycles, resulting in 4,865 people currently scheduled to vote in 2022 being deferred to voting in 2024. A complete demographic analysis is attached to this report.

Next Steps
Following tonight’s hearing the Council may select a preferred map and introduce the Ordinance approving the final selection (Attachment 2). If at tonight’s hearing the Council requests additional revisions, those revisions will be presented at a future public hearing.

Should additional public hearings be necessary to identify and select a preferred map, they will be scheduled accordingly. As stated above, the deadline for the City of Stanton to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022.

Community Outreach
The City has a dedicated redistricting website, mapstanton.org, to serve as a central repository for all information related to the City’s redistricting efforts. Residents can view public hearing notices and flyers in multiple languages (English, Spanish, Korean, and Vietnamese), find the online mapping tools, view draft maps, agendas, staff reports and PowerPoint presentations, as well as learn about redistricting through links to other official websites and the site’s Frequently Asked Questions page. At the time of agenda 7 preparation, the site had been visited 203 times by 148 unique IP addresses (148 different users).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), this action is not a project as defined by the CEQA and will have no result direct or indirect to physical changes in the environment.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notice for this item was made through the regular agenda process. In addition, the notice was translated into Korean, Spanish, and Vietnamese and posted at the City’s three posting locations: City Hall, Stanton Post Office, and Stanton Family Resource Center.

Information was also available via the City’s social media outlets, the City’s public access television channel (Public Cable Television Authority), the City’s website and the City’s dedicated redistricting website.

STRATEGIC PLAN:
1 – Provide a Safe Community
5 – Provide a High Quality of Life
6 – Maintain and Promote a Responsive, High Quality and Transparent Government Prepared By: Approved by:
/s/ Patricia A. Vazquez
Patricia A. Vazquez Jarad L. Hildenbrand
City Clerk City Manager
Attachments:

A. Proposed Maps and Demographic Analysis.

B. Draft Ordinance No. 1120
Attachment
Proposed Maps and Demographic
Analysis
A
Click here to return to the agenda.

Map Option A
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population
CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL**
White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL
AIAN***
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 9,443 -105 -1.10% 4,960 1,207 68 1,731 3,303 - 1,991 - 17 2 9,544 -4 -0.04% 5,479 1,111 93 2,369 3,063 - 1,652 63 1 3 9,516 -32 -0.33% 5,920 1,674 196 1,614 4,318 - 2,226 7 40 4 9,688 140 1.47% 5,536 1,528 43 1,656 3,855 42 2,109 19 21 Total 38,191
Ideal 9,548
Deviation 2.57%
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population
**NL = Non-Latino
***AIAN= American Indian Alaskan Native
Map Option B
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population
CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL**
White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL
AIAN***
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 9,762 214 2.24% 5,128 1,225 71 1,822 3,378 - 2,049 - 17 2 9,615 67 0.70% 5,502 1,126 95 2,393 3,058 - 1,628 63 3 3 9,601 53 0.56% 6,123 1,642 191 1,746 4,378 - 2,291 26 38 4 9,213 -335 -3.51% 5,142 1,527 43 1,409 3,725 42 2,010 - 21 Total 38,191
Ideal 9,548
Deviation 5.75%
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population
**NL = Non-Latino
***AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
Map Option C
Map Option Cv2
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL**
White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL
AIAN***
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 9,900 383 4.03% 5,068 5,148 1,153 93 1,869 3,354 - 2,084 - 21 2 9,776 259 2.72% 5,971 5,496 1,112 108 2,474 2,971 - 1,536 63 1 3 9,394 -123 -1.29% 4,136 6,188 1,740 156 1,623 4,568 - 2,407 26 36 4 8,997 -520 -5.46% 3,700 5,006 1,508 43 1,378 3,616 42 1,937 - 20 Total 38,067
Ideal 9,517 Deviation 9.49%
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population
**NL = Non Latino
***AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
Stanton Map Option D
Total Deviation 2.74%
Map E – No Demographics Available at this time
Will be updated when demographic analysis is complete
ORDINANCE NO. 1120

Page 1 of 5 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1120

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

REGARDING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS, ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES OF CITY

COUNCIL ELECTION DISTRICTS AND CONFIRMING SUCH REVISED COUNCIL

DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, AS REFLECTED IN THE ATTACHED MAP
WHEREAS, the United States Census Bureau is required by Article I, Section 2, of the United States Constitution to conduct an accurate count of the population every ten years; and
WHEREAS, California Elections Code § 21601 requires that following each decennial federal census, and using that census as a basis, the Council shall, by ordinance or resolution, adjust the boundaries of any or all of the Council election districts of the City so that the districts shall be substantially equal in population as required by the United States Constitution, California Constitution, and the Federal Voting Rights Act. In establishing the boundaries of the districts the Council must give consideration to the following factors in the following priority: (a) contiguity of districts, (b) respecting communities of interest, (c) drawing easily identifiable districts through use of natural or artificial boundaries and (d) compactness of territory in districts; and WHEREAS, California Elections Code § 21602 requires that the Council adopt an ordinance amending Council districts no later than April 17, 2022; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2021, the Census Bureau sent 2020 Census data to the State of California with an official population estimate of 38,191 residents for the City of Stanton; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Stanton ("City Council") held seven public hearings on November 26, 2021, December 16, 2021, January 25, 2022, and March 8, 2022, where the Council received briefings from the City’s demographic consultant relating to the redistricting process and state and federal redistricting criteria, including the California Elections Code, the Federal Voting Rights Act and the United States Constitution, heard public testimony, and directed staff and the City's demographic consultant to prepare draft Council district maps for consideration; and WHEREAS, in addition, City staff conducted public outreach by way of as print and digital advertisements; and
WHEREAS, at the January 25, 2022 and March 8, 2022 public hearings, the Council received a presentation of several draft maps prepared by the City's demographic consultant for compliance with applicable laws and standards and reviewed additional maps submitted by the public; and
Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.

ORDINANCE NO. 1113

Page 2 of 5 ends

WHEREAS, at the March 8, 2022 public hearing, the City Council agreed on Map _____, designating it as the preferred map and directed that it be presented to the Council for adoption by Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, at each of the public hearings on redistricting, the Council heard testimony relating to “communities of interest,” which led the Council to reach the following determinations about communities of interest on the preferred map, as required under federal and state law:

1. The election districts are geographically contiguous. The districts are arrayed in a simple and logical form without any islands and with minimal intrusions from the area of one district into another;

2. To the extent practicable, the preferred map respects the geographic integrity of local neighborhoods and local communities of interest. The Council heard testimony about what constitutes communities of interest in the public’s view;

3. The election districts are easily identifiable and understandable by residents.

The districts in the preferred map form a relatively simple pattern;

4. To the extent practicable, the election districts are geographically compact. Their configurations for the most part are compact, simple shapes, with nearby populations included in the same districts;

5. The election districts are balanced in terms of total population and voting age population. The districts are well within the one-person/one-vote deviations permitted under federal and state voting rights laws; and

6. Although the above criteria could not be met within any election district with a minority-majority district (i.e., a voting district where one distinct minority population is the majority population), the election districts do represent where possible an aggregation in single districts of substantial minority population blocs to enhance the potency of that minority voting voice.

WHEREAS, all information in the staff reports, maps, presentations, Council debate and public testimony referenced above is hereby incorporated into this decision and serves as evidentiary basis for these findings and legislative decision.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: This Ordinance is adopted following four noticed City Council public hearings as required by California Elections Code section 21607.1.

ORDINANCE NO. 1113

Page 3 of 5 ends

SECTION 2: City Council elections shall continue to be conducted "by districts" in four districts as set forth in Exhibit A. The term “by district” shall mean election of members of the legislative body by voters of the district alone, as provided in Government Code Section 34871(d).

SECTION 3: All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed.

SECTION 4: The City Manager is directed to take all necessary steps to give effect to this Ordinance. If necessary to facilitate the implementation of this Ordinance, the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to make technical adjustments to the election district boundaries that do not substantively affect the populations in the districts, the eligibility of candidates, or the residence of elected officials within any district. The City Manager shall consult with the City Attorney concerning any technical adjustments deemed necessary and shall advise the City Council of any such adjustments required in the implementation of the districts.

SECTION 5: The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Orange County Registrar of Voters for use in subsequent Stanton City Council Elections.

SECTION 6: Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. This activity is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.) §§ 15061(b)(3), 15320, and 15378(b)(3). The redistricting process is an organizational and administrative activity of the City, does not have the potential to result in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and is therefore not a project for purposes of CEQA. (State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15061(b)(3); 15378(b)(5).) In the event the transition process does constitute a project, it is categorically exempt under the Class 20 (Changes in the Organization of Local Governments) categorical exemption. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15320.) None of the exceptions to the exemptions found in State CEQA Guidelines, § 15300.2 apply.

SECTION 7: Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 8: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

ORDINANCE NO. 1113

Page 4 of 5 ends

SECTION 9: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be to be posted in the three (3) designated posting places within the City of Stanton, pursuant to all legal requirements.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of March, 2022.

DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM

HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO. 1113

Page 5 of 5 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF STANTON )
I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1120 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Stanton, California, held on the 8th day of March, 2022 and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 22nd day of March, 2022, by the following roll-call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT A
Final District Boundary Map
[To be added after hearing on March 8, 2022]
Item: 12B
Click here to return to the agenda.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 3 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 4 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 5 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 6 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 7 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 8 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 9 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 10 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 11 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 12 of 13 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 13 of 13 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: March 8, 2022
SUBJECT: JANUARY 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of January 31, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of January 2022.

BACKGROUND:

Changes in the City’s cash and investment balances for the month of January are summarized below:

Between December 31, 2021, and January 31, 2022, the City’s total cash and investments increased by approximately $2.5 million. During the month of January, the City received approximately $2.7 million in property tax revenue from the County of Orange.

The attached reports summarize the City investments and deposit balances as of January 31, 2022. The City’s cash and investment balances by fund type are presented in Attachment A. A summary of the City’s investment portfolio is included as Attachment B.

The detail of the City’s investments by type are shown in Attachment C.

Beginning Balance Net Change Ending Balance
Cash and Investment Accounts (Pooled-All Funds) $ 58,746,392.08 $ 2,673,300.81 $ 61,419,692.89 Cash (Non-Pooled) 4,679,464.81 (141,096.96) 4,538,367.85 Total Cash and Investments $ 63,425,856.89 $ 2,532,203.85 $ 65,958,060.74 Item: 12C
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 ANALYSIS:

The monthly cash and investment report provides a summary of the cash and investment accounts held by the City as of the end of that month. In order to manage its cash and investments, the City combines cash resources from all funds into a single pool consisting of a variety of accounts and securities. The balance in the pooled cash account includes cash and certain liquid investments that are available to meet the City’s current cash needs. Cash in excess of the City’s current cash needs is invested in interest-bearing investments with various maturities.

Detailed information regarding the securities contained in the City’s investment portfolio is provided in Attachments B and C. As of January 31, 2022, City investments consisted of the following:

As of January 31, 2022, the average purchase yield to maturity earned on the City’s total investment portfolio was 0.58%, which is above the benchmark LAIF return of 0.23%. The weighted average maturity of the City’s was approximately 83 days (approximately 3 months) as of January 31, 2022, which is in compliance with the City’s investment policy restriction of 3.5 years.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Investment Policy. The portfolio will allow the City to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. Staff remains confident that the investment portfolio is currently positioned to remain secure and sufficiently liquid.

The City Treasurer controls a $55.5 million portfolio, with $9.5 million in investments held in a safekeeping account with Bank of the West.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT :

None.

Market Value as of
January 31, 2022
Average
Interest
Rate
Percentage of
Portfolio
Invested by
Type
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Permitted by
Investment
Policy In Compliance?
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) $ 40,710,609.49 0.23% 73.41% 100.00% Yes California Asset Management Program (CAMP) 5,252,490.74 0.05% 9.47% 100.00% Yes Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 7,752,788.41 2.46% 13.98% 30.00% Yes Municipal Bonds 1,737,013.90 2.25% 3.13% 100.00% Yes
Total Investments $ 55,452,902.54 100.00%
3 LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION :

Through the normal agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED

4. Ensure Fiscal Stability and Efficiency in Governance Prepared by: Approved by:
/s/ Michelle Bannigan /s/ Jarad L. Hildenbrand
________________________________ __________________________ Michelle Bannigan, CPA Jarad L. Hildenbrand
Finance Director City Manager

Attachments:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments Portfolio Summary
C. Investment Portfolio Detail
Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance 101-various General Fund $ 19,008,669.62 $ 3,766,805.91 $ (1,469,683.28) $ 21,305,792.25 102-111101 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) (179,248.40) 383,403.16 (308,194.80) (104,040.04) 210-111101 Certified Access Specialists (CASP) Program 49,240.33 - - 49,240.33 211-111101 Gas Tax Fund 1,148,499.88 - (21,839.06) 1,126,660.82215-111101 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation act (RMRA) Fund 107,004.19 643,284.39 - 750,288.58 220-111101 Measure M Fund 843,047.300 103,375.75 (50,312.76) 896,110.29 221-111101 Community Development Block Grant-COVID-19 (CDBG-CV) Fund (37,500.00) - (9,900.00) (47,400.00)222-111101 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund 210,849.35 - - 210,849.35 223-111101 Protective Services Fund - 24,481.11 (24,481.11) - 224-111101 Lighting Maintenance 1919 Act Fund 449,749.58 14,364.81 (10,479.30) 453,635.09225-111101 Lighting/Median Maintenance 1972 Act Fund 1,164,543.56 8,572.50 (17,887.63) 1,155,228.43 226-111101 Air Quality Improvement Fund 169,919.20 - - 169,919.20 242-111101 Supplemental Law Enforcement Grant Fund (current) 416,010.56 22,971.09 (12,500.00) 426,481.65 250-111101 Families and Communities Together (FaCT) Grant Fund 23,400.21 (38,718.01) (16,479.75) (31,797.55) 251-111101 Senior Transportation Fund 53,240.68 7,292.51 (3,009.89) 57,523.30 257-111101 America Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) Fund 3,795,634.67 - (67,934.69) 3,727,699.98 261-111101 Street Impact Fees Fund 87,872.73 - - 87,872.73 262-111101 Traffic Signal Impact Fees Fund 51,019.71 - - 51,019.71 263-111101 Community Center Impact Fees Fund 160,086.68 - - 160,086.68 264-111101 Police Services Impact Fees Fund 144,625.51 - - 144,625.51 280-111101 Stanton Central Park Maintenance Fund (22,605.00) 53,428.33 (7,167.00) 23,656.33 285-various Stanton Housing Authority Fund 12,258,807.51 131,538.93 (70,370.23) 12,319,976.21 305-111101 Capital Projects Fund 278,929.05 8,448.54 (8,448.54) 278,929.05 310-111101 Park and Recreation Facilities Fund 3,659,176.90 - 3,659,176.90 - 501-111101 Sewer Maintenance Fund 5,694,873.47 52,671.45 (25,358.01) 5,722,186.91 502-111101 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund 6,640.86 104.40 - 6,745.26 602-111101 Workers' Compensation Fund 555,914.89 6,431.23 (300.00) 562,046.12603-111101 Liability Risk Management Fund 126,358.05 - - 126,358.05604-111101 Employee Benefits Fund 71,908.06 127,433.35 (50,210.28) 149,131.13 605-111101 Fleet Maintenance Fund 400,762.91 9,552.84 (3,094.99) 407,220.76 801-111101 Expendable Deposits Fund (40,366.17) - (140.68) (40,506.85) 901-111101 North Orange County Public Safety Task Force (NOCPSTF) Trust Fund - 7,615,164.21 (187.50) 7,614,976.71 Total Pooled Cash and Investments(1) $ 4,851,280.31 58,746,392.08 $ $ (2,177,979.50) $ 61,419,692.89 Less: Investments(1) $ (55,589,470.13) $ (21,254.24) $ 157,821.83 $ (55,452,902.54) Cash - Bank of the West General Checking Account $ 3,156,921.95 $ 4,830,026.07 $ (2,020,157.67) $ 5,966,790.35

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED JANUARY 31, 2022

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda.

Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED JANUARY 31, 2022

CASH-NON-POOLED
101-111103 Payroll Account $ - $ 249,287.95 $ (249,287.95) $ -101-111109 Flexible Spending/AFLAC 4,036.09 14,813.65 (822.10) 18,027.64101-111505 Petty Cash 600.00 - - 600.00 604-111404 Cash with Fiscal Agent (PARS) (2) - 4,674,828.72 (155,088.51) 4,519,740.21 Total Cash-Non-Pooled $ 4,679,464.81 $ 264,101.60 $ (405,198.56) $ 4,538,367.85

INVESTMENTS
POOLED ALL FUNDS $ 55,589,470.13 $ 21,254.24 $ (157,821.83) $ 55,452,902.54 Total Investments (3) $ 21,254.24 55,589,470.13 $ $ (157,821.83) $ 55,452,902.54 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 63,425,856.89 $ 5,115,381.91 $ (2,583,178.06) $ 65,958,060.74 Notes:
(3)
- The Portfolio Summary Report and Holdings by Security Type are included in Attachments B and C, respectively. (1)
- Pooled cash includes: City's Bank of the West general checking and safekeeping accounts, the City's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) account, the Housing Authority's LAIF account, the California Asset Management Program (CAMP) account, and the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) account. (2)
- The Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) account is an irrevocable trust that can be used for pension and other post employment benefits only. This fund is excluded from the compliance requirements set forth in the City's investment policy.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 2 ends

City of Stanton
Distribution
Group By: Portfolio Name
Average By: Face Amount/Shares
Portfolio / Report Group: All Portfolios
As of: 1/31/2022
Bank of the West | Fixed Assets 9,303,000.00 2.420 9,319,816.20 491 16.77 9,489,802.31 9,307,988.98 1.32 CAMP 5,252,490.74 0.050 5,252,490.74 1 9.47 5,252,490.74 5,252,490.74 0.00 LAIF | City 27,730,137.82 0.234 27,730,137.82 1 49.98 27,585,319.24 27,730,137.82 0.00 LAIF | Housing Authority 13,194,195.96 0.234 13,194,195.96 1 23.78 13,125,290.25 13,194,195.96 0.00 TOTAL / AVERAGE 55,479,824.52 0.583 55,496,640.72 83 100 55,452,902.54 55,484,813.50 0.22 Portfolio Name Face Amount/Shares YTM @ Cost Cost Value Days To Maturity % of Portfolio Market Value Book Value Duration To Maturity

ATTACHMENT B
Click here to return to the agenda.

City of Stanton
Portfolio Holdings
Investment Portfolio | by Security Sector
Report Format: By Transaction
Group By: Security Sector
Average By: Face Amount / Shares
Portfolio / Report Group: All Portfolios
As of 1/31/2022
Description CUSIP/Ticker
Settlement
Date
YTM @
Cost
Face
Amount/Shares Cost Value Book Value Market Value
Maturity
Date
Days To
Maturity
Accrued
Interest
% of
Portfolio
Certificate Of Deposit
Allegiance Bank TX 2.65 2/14/2023 01748DBB1 4/11/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 254,495.43 2/14/2023 379 307.33 0.45 American Eagle Bank IL 2.1 5/23/2022 02554BCN9 6/9/2017 2.100 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,924.00 5/23/2022 112 69.04 0.27 American Express UT 2.35 8/8/2022 02587DV47 8/8/2017 2.350 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 249,751.58 8/8/2022 189 2,798.88 0.45 American Express UT 2.4 8/29/2022 02587CFU9 8/29/2017 2.400 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 250,092.44 8/29/2022 210 2,468.65 0.45 Bank Hapoalim NY 2.9 3/25/2024 06251AW48 4/24/2019 2.900 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 259,882.50 3/25/2024 784 2,542.47 0.45 Bank of New England NH 2.65
5/23/2024 06426KBE7 5/23/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 257,991.39 5/23/2024 843 144.62 0.45 Capital One Bank VA 2.35 3/15/2022 140420Z52 3/15/2017 2.350 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,667.12 3/15/2022 43 2,203.46 0.45 Capital One VA 2.3 7/19/2022 14042RGN5 7/19/2017 2.300 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 249,445.30 7/19/2022 169 186.77 0.45 Cornerstone Community Bank CA 2.6
5/17/2024 219240BY3 5/17/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 257,665.20 5/17/2024 837 248.32 0.45 EagleBank MD 2.65 4/28/2023 27002YEL6 4/30/2019 2.650 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 255,294.72 4/28/2023 452 18.08 0.45 Evansville Teachers FCU IN 2.25
7/22/2024 299547AV1 7/22/2019 2.250 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 255,957.06 7/22/2024 903 138.14 0.45 First Technology FCU CA 3.35
9/27/2023 33715LCJ7 9/27/2018 3.350 240,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 249,967.20 9/27/2023 604 88.11 0.43 First Tier Bank NE 1.95 8/23/2024 33766LAJ7 8/23/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 254,181.69 8/23/2024 935 106.42 0.45 Goldman Sachs Bank NY 2.35
6/21/2022 38148PKX4 6/21/2017 2.350 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 249,114.32 6/21/2022 141 652.01 0.45 Greenstate FCU IA 1.95 2/28/2023 39573LAF5 8/28/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 252,777.33 2/28/2023 393 39.91 0.45 Healthcare Systems FCU VA 2.65
4/25/2024 42228LAD3 4/25/2019 2.650 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 254,651.82 4/25/2024 815 1,750.31 0.44 Horizon Bank NE 1.7 8/29/2023 44042TBQ6 7/29/2019 2.101 249,000.00 245,090.70 247,493.40 254,475.51 8/29/2023 575 23.19 0.45 I&C Bank of China, NY 2.15 4/12/2022 45581EAC5 8/15/2019 2.104 247,000.00 247,296.40 247,021.67 248,010.23 4/12/2022 71 276.44 0.45 Main Street Bank VA 2.6 4/26/2024 56065GAG3 4/26/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 257,520.78 4/26/2024 816 88.68 0.45 McGregor TX 2.3 6/28/2024 32112UDA6 7/12/2019 2.200 249,000.00 250,170.30 249,567.40 257,744.88 6/28/2024 879 47.07 0.45 Merrick Bank UT 2.6 8/23/2023 59013J7P8 4/23/2019 2.600 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 256,044.21 8/23/2023 569 141.90 0.45 Morgan Stanley NY 3.1 2/7/2024 61760AVJ5 2/7/2019 3.100 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 256,280.34 2/7/2024 737 3,698.09 0.44 Morgan Stanley UT 3.1 2/7/2024 61690UDW7 2/7/2019 3.100 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 256,280.34 2/7/2024 737 3,698.09 0.44 Mountain America CU UT 3 3/27/2023 62384RAF3 4/9/2019 2.840 249,000.00 250,494.00 249,433.34 255,969.51 3/27/2023 420 81.86 0.45 Raymond James Bank FL 2 8/23/2024 75472RAE1 8/23/2019 2.000 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 252,438.94 8/23/2024 935 2,179.01 0.45 Sallie Mae Bank UT 2.3 8/2/2022 795450B61 8/2/2017 2.300 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 250,623.84 8/2/2022 183 2,844.19 0.45 State Bank India NY 2.35 3/14/2022 8562846V1 3/14/2017 2.350 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,649.76 3/14/2022 42 2,219.43 0.45 Synchrony Bank UT 2.4 5/19/2022 87165EL96 5/19/2017 2.400 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 248,679.60 5/19/2022 108 1,185.60 0.45

ATTACHMENT C

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda.

Description CUSIP/Ticker
Settlement
Date
YTM @
Cost
Face
Amount/Shares Cost Value Book Value Market Value
Maturity
Date
Days To
Maturity
Accrued
Interest
% of
Portfolio
TIAA FSB FL 2.1 7/29/2022 87270LCM3 7/29/2019 2.100 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 249,331.68 7/29/2022 179 28.42 0.45 University of Iowa CU IA 3.05 5/15/2023 91435LAG2 4/25/2019 2.919 248,000.00 249,240.00 248,392.68 255,678.08 5/15/2023 469 621.70 0.45 Washington Federal Bank WA 1.95
8/28/2024 938828BN9 8/28/2019 1.950 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 254,201.61 8/28/2024 940 39.91 0.45 Sub Total / Average Certificate Of
Deposit 2.459 7,583,000.00 7,583,291.40 7,582,908.49 7,752,788.41 504 30,936.10 13.67 Local Government Investment Pool
CAMP LGIP CAMP3001 2/29/2020 0.050 5,252,490.74 5,252,490.74 5,252,490.74 5,252,490.74 N/A 1 9.47 LAIF | City LGIP LAIFCITY0895 2/29/2020 0.234 27,730,137.82 27,730,137.82 27,730,137.82 27,585,319.24 N/A 1 49.98 LAIF | Housing Authority LGIP LAIFHA0004 2/29/2020 0.234 13,194,195.96 13,194,195.96 13,194,195.96 13,125,290.25 N/A 1 23.78 Sub Total / Average Local
Government Investment Pool 0.213 46,176,824.52 46,176,824.52 46,176,824.52 45,963,100.23 1 0.00 83.23 Municipal
Arvin Community CA 2.5 3/1/2023 043288AK5 8/8/2019 2.350 275,000.00 276,399.75 275,423.91 278,940.75 3/1/2023 394 2,864.58 0.50 Fort Bragg CA 1.871 8/1/2024 347028JZ6 9/18/2019 1.750 205,000.00 206,150.05 205,590.22 205,137.35 8/1/2024 913 1,917.78 0.37 Riverside Pension CA 2.5 6/1/2022 769036BB9 6/20/2017 2.251 500,000.00 505,800.00 500,388.38 503,085.00 6/1/2022 121 2,083.33 0.90 Riverside Pension CA 2.5 6/1/2022 769036BB9 7/24/2017 2.401 240,000.00 241,080.00 240,073.71 241,480.80 6/1/2022 121 1,000.00 0.43 Riverside Pension CA 2.75 6/1/2024 769036BD5 8/28/2019 2.030 250,000.00 258,120.00 253,978.29 255,805.00 6/1/2024 852 1,145.83 0.45 Stockton CA 2.5 9/1/2023 861403AU7 5/1/2019 2.600 250,000.00 248,975.00 249,625.98 252,565.00 9/1/2023 578 2,604.17 0.45 Sub Total / Average Municipal 2.247 1,720,000.00 1,736,524.80 1,725,080.49 1,737,013.90 432 11,615.69 3.10 Total / Average 0.583 55,479,824.52 55,496,640.72 55,484,813.50 55,452,902.54 83 42,551.79 100

ATTACHMENT C

Page 2 of 2 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Successor Agency DATE: March 8, 2022
SUBJECT: JANUARY 2022 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY) REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of January 31, 2022, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of January 2022.

BACKGROUND:

The attached reports summarize the Successor Agency investments and deposit balances as of January 2022. During the month of January, the Successor Agency’s total cash and investment balances decreased by approximately $4,167. During the month of January, the Successor Agency transferred $2.7 million from the Bank of the West checking account to various U.S. Bank fiscal agent accounts. U.S. Bank will hold these funds to fund future debt service payments. The Successor Agency’s cash and investment balances by fund are presented in Attachment A. The Successor Agency’s investments and deposits are included as Attachment B.

ANALYSIS:

The Successor Agency’s share of the City’s investment in the State Treasurer’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) continues to be available on demand. The effective yield on LAIF for the month of January 2022 was 0.23%.

The Successor Agency’s investments are shown on Attachment B and have a weighted investment yield of 0.23%, which is equal to the benchmark LAIF return of 0.23%, as the Item: 12D
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 entire portfolio (excluding funds held with the bond fiscal agents) represents the Successor Agency’s portion of LAIF and Bank of the West funds invested by the City.

With a completely liquid portfolio, the weighted average maturity of the Successor Agency’s investments on January 31, 2022, is 1 day. LAIF’s average maturity on January 31, 2022, is approximately 322 days.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2021-22 Investment Policy.

The portfolio will allow the Successor Agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None
LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments and Deposits
Fund/
Account No. Fund/Account Name
Beginning
Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance

CASH-POOLED
712-111101 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund $ 5,229,919.16 $ (2,729,287.72) - $ $ 2,500,631.44 Total Cash-Pooled (1) $ - 5,229,919.16 $ (2,729,287.72) $ 2,500,631.44 $ CASH-RESTRICTED (with Fiscal Agent)
712-111423 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A and B $ 28.88 $ 824,708.62 $ - $ 824,737.50712-111425 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series C and D 18.30 1,233,612.95 - 1,233,631.25 712-111426 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series A 0.52 666,799.48 - 666,800.00 Total Cash-Restricted (with Fiscal Agent) $ 47.70 $ 2,725,121.05 $ 2,725,168.75 - $ TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 5,229,966.86 $ 2,725,121.05 $ (2,729,287.72) $ 5,225,800.19 Note:
(1) - Includes the Successor Agency's share of the City's Bank of the West checking account and Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED JANUARY 31, 2022
ATTACHMENT A Click here to return to the agenda.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

INVESTMENTS AND DEPOSITS
Investment Issuer/ Date of Market MV
Type Institution Broker Maturity Cost Value Source
LAIF and BOW General Acct State of California/ BOW State of California On Demand 0.23% N/A $ 2,500,631 $ 2,500,631 LAIF Total Cash Investments and Deposits 1 0.23% $ 2,500,631 $ 2,500,631 Weighted AverageWeighted Average
Bond Funds Held by Trustees: Maturity (days) Yield
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturity Rate Value Cost Value Source 2016 Series A and BDebt Service:Cash Equivalents US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 824,736 $ $ 824,736 $ US Bank 824,736 Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Interest:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Total 2016 Series A and B $ 824,738 $ 824,738 Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturit
y Rate
Value Cost
Value Source
2016 Series C and DDebt Service:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1,233,630 $ $ 1,233,630 $ 1,233,630 US Bank Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Total 2016 Series C and D $ 1,233,631 $ 1,233,631
MONTH ENDED JANUARY 31, 2022
Rate
Interest

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda.

Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturity Rate Value Cost Value Source 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Special Fund:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 666,800 $ $ 666,800 $ US Bank 666,800 Total 2010 Tax Allocation Bonds (Tax-Exempt) $ 666,800 $ 666,800 Total Bond Fund Investments and Deposits (3) $ 2,725,169 2,725,169 $ TOTAL - ALL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $5,225,800 $5,225,800 Notes:
(1) - There have been no exceptions to the Investment Policy.(2) - The Successor Agency is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.(3) - Restricted Bond Funds are held by the fiscal agent.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 2 of 2 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
DATE: March 8, 2022
SUBJECT: JANUARY 2022 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE
REPORT; AND STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended January 31, 2022, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund’s January 2022 Revenue and Expenditure Report and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended January 31, 2022.

ANALYSIS:

General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachments A and B summarize the General Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through January 31, 2022. The reports include information for the month of January, on a year-to-date basis through January, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through January) is included as well.

Item: 12E
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 As of January 31, total General Fund revenues received to date was approximately $13.9 million, which represents 51% of the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budgeted amount and is approximately $907,000 (7%) higher than the revenues collected for the same period last year (Attachment A, page 2). The primary reason for the increase is because of increased taxes collected during the current year for property tax, transient occupancy tax, sales tax, and transaction and use tax.

Total General Fund expenditures were approximately $14.2 million through January 31, which represents 53% of the 2021/22 projected expenditures and is approximately $811,000 (6%) higher than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year (Attachment B, page 2). The primary reason for the increase is due to law enforcement and fire protection services contact costs which were 7% and 5% higher, respectively, than the same period last year.

Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachment C summarizes the Housing Authority Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through January 31, 2022. The report includes information for the activity during the month of January, information on a year-to-date basis through January, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through January) is included as well.

As of January 31, total Housing Authority Fund revenues received to date was approximately $893,000, which represents 137% of the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budgeted amount and is approximately $375,000 (72%) more than the revenue collected through the same period last year. Through January 2022, the Housing Authority received $681,902 in revenue from property sales. Of this amount, $606,902 was for the sale of the property located at 7455 Katella Avenue. The remaining $75,000 was for deposits received from three developers per the exclusive negotiation agreement related to the Tina-Pacific Development Project. This revenue will be adjusted with the City’s proposed budget adjustments at the upcoming Mid-Year Budget Update for Fiscal Year 2021/22.

Total Housing Authority Fund expenditures were approximately $1.5 million through January 31, which represents 36% of the 2021/22 projected expenditures and is approximately $1.5 million (51%) lower than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year. In November 2020, the Housing Authority made $2.6 million in payments for Project Homekey.

Status of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) (Attachment D) The Fiscal Year 2021/22 CIP budget includes $3.3 million from the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Adopted Budget, $822,843 in carryover funding from Fiscal Year 2020/21, and $50,000 in other adjustments approved by the City Council between July 2021, and January 2022, for a total amended budget of $4.2 million as of January 31, 2022. As of January 3 31, capital project expenditures totaled $50,826 (1% of the amended budget) with an additional $119,224 (3% of the amended budget) under contract (encumbered) for work currently underway, for a total amount spent or encumbered to date of $170,050 (4% of the amended budget) as of January 31, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED

A. January 2022 General Fund Revenues
B. January 2022 General Fund Expenditures
C. January 2022 Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditures D. Status of Capital Improvement Projects as of January 31, 2022 %
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2020/21 From Budget Budget January Actual * Budget Actual Prior Year TAXES
Property Tax 7,213,500 $ $ 7,213,500 $ 2,595,480 $ 4,043,497 56.05% 3,599,199 $ 12.34% Sales and Use Tax 4,810,000 4,810,000 348,830 2,151,712 44.73% 1,980,260 8.66% Transactions and Use Tax 4,998,000 4,998,000 383,403 2,335,588 46.73% 2,064,944 13.11% Transient Occupancy Tax 480,000 480,000 81,399 334,790 69.75% 267,839 25.00% Franchise Fees 1,109,500 1,109,500 43,336 285,629 25.74% 306,908 ‐6.93% Business Licenses 160,000 160,000 25,807 109,952 68.72% 110,067 ‐0.10%Utility Users Tax 1,881,000 1,881,000 156,229 1,055,182 56.10% 1,056,226 ‐0.10% Tax Increment Pass‐thru Payment 338,000 338,000 ‐ 270,516 80.03% 215,950 25.27% TAXES‐TOTAL 20,990,000 20,990,000 3,634,484 10,586,866 50.44% 9,601,393 10.26%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
County WDA Shared Revenue 160,000 160,000 ‐ 101,376 63.36% ‐ 100.00% Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** Motor Vehicle In Lieu 20,000 20,000 45,717 45,717 228.59% ‐ 100.00% Public Safety Augmentation Tax 161,075 161,075 14,729 85,698 53.20% 67,306 27.33% Planning Grants ‐ ‐ 152,434 152,434 ** ‐ 100.00%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL‐TOTAL 371,075 371,075 212,880 385,225 103.81% 67,306 472.35%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES
Charges for Services 105,280 86,030 6,874 47,957 55.74% 51,797 ‐7.41% Information Technology Charges 30,345 30,345 2,529 17,701 58.33% 14,166 100.00% CHARGES FOR SERVICES‐TOTAL 135,625 116,375 9,403 65,658 56.42% 65,963 ‐0.46%

FEES AND PERMITS
Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,150,000 1,150,000 91,955 468,433 40.73% 422,999 10.74% Building Permits and Fees 1,300,000 1,300,000 36,141 511,222 39.32% 1,241,574 ‐58.82%Planning Permits and Fees 106,250 106,250 6,060 48,905 46.03% 50,643 ‐3.43% Engineering Permits and Fees 73,300 73,300 15,250 64,961 88.62% 42,236 53.80% Public Benefit Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** ‐ 326,057 100.00% Recycling Fees 93,750 93,750 ‐ 19,525 20.83% 20,320 ‐3.91%Other Permits and Fees 267,500 267,500 44,977 177,187 66.24% 330,257 ‐46.35% Community Services Fees 46,500 46,500 7,043 46,870 100.80% 16,989 63.75% FEES AND PERMITS ‐TOTAL 3,037,300 3,037,300 201,426 1,337,103 44.02% 2,451,075 ‐45.45% January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2021/22
ATTACHMENT A - Page 1 of 11 Click here to return to the agenda. %
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2020/21 From Budget Budget January Actual * Budget Actual Prior Year January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2021/22

FINES AND FORFEITURES
General Fines 600 600 ‐ 18,170 3028.33% 485 3646.39%
Motor Vehicle Fines 120,670 120,670 ‐ 20,777 17.22% 61,496 ‐66.21% Parking Citations 205,000 205,000 25,197 148,321 72.35% 152,822 ‐2.95% DMV Parking Collections 70,300 70,300 3,815 32,721 46.54% 25,210 29.79% Administrative Citation 15,000 15,000 240 3,700 24.67% ‐ 6,194 40.26% FINES AND FORFEITURES‐TOTAL 411,570 411,570 29,252 223,689 54.35% 246,207 ‐9.15%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
Investment Earnings 185,000 185,000 ‐ 71,192 38.48% 116,871 ‐39.08% Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐ ‐ (122,685) (250,345) ** ‐ (87,553) 185.94% Interest on Loan to Landscape District Fund 16,570 ‐ 16,570 10,882 65.67% ‐ 100.00% Rental Income 28,305 28,305 15,571 43,611 154.08% 7,075 516.41% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY‐TOTAL 229,875 229,875 (107,114) (124,660) ‐54.23% 36,393 ‐442.54%

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
Miscellaneous Revenue 198,700 269,500 9,969 132,185 49.05% 167,731 ‐21.19% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE‐TOTAL 198,700 269,500 9,969 132,185 49.05% 167,731 ‐21.19%

TRANSFERS IN
From Gas Tax Fund 205,000 205,000 17,083 119,583 58.33% 70,292 70.12% From Protective Services Fund 375,000 375,000 24,481 217,697 58.05% 252,770 ‐13.88% From Supplemental Law Enforcement Grants Fund 150,000 150,000 12,500 87,500 58.33% 54,594 60.27% From Housing Authority Fund ‐ 890,000 ‐ 890,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% TRANSFERS IN‐TOTAL 730,000 1,620,000 54,064 1,314,780 81.16% 377,656 71.28% TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $ 26,104,145 $ 27,045,695 $ 4,044,364 $ 13,920,846 51.47% 13,013,724 $ 6.97% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT A - Page 2 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund430100 Current Year‐Secured $ 1,144,000 $ 1,144,000 $ 69,626 $ 633,555 55.38% 624,166 1.50% 430105 Current Year‐Unsecured 32,500 32,500 ‐ 18,532 57.02% 26,907 ‐31.13% 430115 Property Tax‐Supplemental 23,000 23,000 3,742 9,217 40.07% 9,536 ‐3.35% 430120 Residual Redevelopment Property Tax 1,267,000 1,267,000 ‐ 791,483 62.47% 582,742 35.82% 430121 In‐Lieu Vehicle License Fee 4,640,000 4,640,000 2,504,005 2,504,005 53.97% 2,274,741 10.08% 430135 Homeowners Tax Relief 1,000 1,000 1,736 2,480 248.00% 781 217.54% 430140 Property Transfer Tax 106,000 106,000 16,259 84,113 79.35% 79,387 5.95% 430145 Property Tax‐Penalties/Int ‐ ‐ 112 112 ** 939 ‐88.07% 430200 Sales And Use Tax 4,810,000 4,810,000 348,830 2,151,712 44.73% 1,980,260 8.66% 430300 Transient Occupancy Tax 480,000 480,000 81,399 334,790 69.75% 267,839 25.00% 430405 Franchise Tax/Cable TV 224,500 224,500 ‐ 51,718 23.04% 85,382 ‐39.43%430410 Franchise Tax/Electric 214,000 214,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430415 Franchise Tax/Gas 58,000 58,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430420 Franchise Tax/Refuse 525,000 525,000 43,336 233,911 44.55% 221,526 5.59% 430425 Franchise Tax/Water 88,000 88,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 430500 Business License Tax 160,000 160,000 25,807 109,952 68.72% 110,067 ‐0.10% 430600 Util User Tax/Electricity 935,500 935,500 90,838 617,587 66.02% 620,484 ‐0.47% 430605 Util User Tax/Telephone 316,000 316,000 20,089 103,572 32.78% 113,935 ‐9.10% 430610 Util User Tax/Gas 211,000 211,000 24,812 105,256 49.88% 82,408 27.73% 430615 Util User Tax/Water 418,500 418,500 20,490 228,767 54.66% 239,399 ‐4.44% 440100 AB 1389 Pass Through from RDA 338,000 338,000 ‐ 270,516 80.03% 215,950 25.27% 101 General Fund 15,992,000 15,992,000 3,251,081 8,251,278 51.60% 7,536,449 9.48%102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) 430250 Transactions & Use Tax 4,998,000 4,998,000 383,403 2,335,588 46.73% 2,064,944 13.11% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) 4,998,000 4,998,000 383,403 2,335,588 46.73% 2,064,944 13.11% TAXES ‐ TOTAL $ 20,990,000 $ 20,990,000 $ 3,634,484 $ 10,586,866 50.44% 9,601,393 $ 10.26% TAXES
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT A - Page 3 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund433100 Charges For Services $ 105,280 $ 86,030 $ 6,874 $ 47,957 55.74% 51,797 $ ‐7.41% 433136 Information Technology Charges 30,345 30,345 2,529 17,701 58.33% 14,166 19.97% CHARGES FOR SERVICES ‐ TOTAL $ 135,625 $ 116,375 $ 9,403 $ 65,658 56.42% $ ‐ 65,963 0.46%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT A - Page 4 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund432121 County WDA Shared Revenue $ 160,000 $ ‐ 160,000 $ $ 101,376 63.36% $ ‐ 100.00%432135 Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 ‐ 30,000 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 432150 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 20,000 20,000 45,717 45,717 228.59% ‐ 100.00% 432180 Public Safety Augmentation Tax 161,075 161,075 14,729 85,698 53.20% 67,306 21.46% 432245 Planning Grants ‐ ‐ 152,434 152,434 ** ‐ 100.00% INTERGOVERNMENTAL ‐ TOTAL $ 371,075 $ 371,075 $ 212,880 $ 385,225 103.81% $ 67,306 472.35%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT A - Page 5 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund431100 Building Plan Check Fees $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 17,541 $ 154,840 221.20% 20,823 $ 643.60% 431105 Mechanical Permits 250,000 250,000 1,420 39,260 15.70% 322,530              ‐87.83% 431110 Building Permits 750,000 750,000 11,980 242,483 32.33% 633,796              ‐61.74% 431115 Plumbing Permits 80,000 80,000 565 20,355 25.44%                ‐ 72,235 71.82% 431120 Electrical Permits 150,000 150,000 4,635 54,284 36.19% 192,190 ‐71.76% 431130 Engineering Plan Check Fees 33,300 33,300 10,370 34,775 104.43% 17,520 98.49% 431135 Public Works Permits 40,000 40,000 4,880 30,186 75.47% 24,716 22.13%431140 S M I P ‐ Commercial Fees 500 500 ‐ 7 1.40% 205 ‐96.59% 431145 S M I P‐Residential Permits 1,000 1,000 ‐ 41 4.10% 33 24.24% 431146 SB 1473 Fee 2,500 2,500 37 439 17.56%                  ‐ 2,893 84.83% 431150 Grading Plan Review ‐ ‐ 1,445 8,670 ** 8,670 0.00% 431155 Grading Permits ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,940 ** 5,145 ‐75.00%
431160 Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,150,000 1,150,000 91,955 468,433 40.73% 422,999 10.74% 431185 Parking Permits 50,000 50,000 14,775 25,557 51.11% 7,993 219.74%431190 Towing Franchise Fee 30,000 30,000 1,260 12,960 43.20% 25,200                ‐48.57% 431194 Public Benefit Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ **              ‐ 326,057 100.00% 431195 Other Fees & Permits 15,000 15,000 1,350 14,120 94.13% 18,670                ‐24.37% 431200 Cannabis Business Initial Permit Fee ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ **              ‐ 143,000 100.00% 433200 Conditional Use Permit 6,000 6,000 ‐ 12,425 207.08% ‐ 100.00% 433205 Precise Plan Of Design 15,000 15,000 ‐ 2,100 14.00% 9,230 ‐77.25% 433210 Variance 2,000 2,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
433220 Preliminary Plan Review 6,000 6,000 1,875 9,375 156.25% 1,875 80.00% 433225 Environmental Services 4,400 4,400 ‐ 505 11.48% 4,145 ‐87.82% 433227 Foreclosure Registration 10,850 10,850 2,950 5,419 49.94%                  ‐ 6,979 22.35% 433230 Zoning Entitlements 5,000 5,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
433235 Land Divisions 10,000 10,000 ‐ 2,500 25.00% 5,265 ‐52.52% 433240 Special Event Permits 500 500 ‐ 180 36.00% 540 ‐66.67%433245 Sign/Ban'R/Gar Sa/Temp Use Per 6,000 6,000 180 3,780 63.00% 1,415 167.14% 433250 Ministerial Services 15,000 15,000 1,055 9,605 64.03% 8,880 8.16%

FEES AND PERMITS
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
ATTACHMENT A - Page 6 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund

FEES AND PERMITS
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
433260 Landscape Plan Check 1,000 ‐ 1,000 1,300 130.00% ‐ 100.00% 433270 General Plan Maint Surcharge 15,000 15,000 ‐ 1,507 10.05% ‐ 11,645 87.06% 433285 Other Developmental Fees 5,000 5,000 ‐ 389 7.78% 1,209 ‐67.82% 433305 General Recreation Programs 24,000 24,000 4,505 26,122 108.84% 834 96.81% 433315 Sports Fields 22,500 22,500 2,538 20,748 92.21% 16,155 22.14% 437115 Recycling Fees 93,750 93,750 ‐ 19,525 20.83% ‐ 20,320 3.91% 430505 New/Moved Bus Lic Appl Rev 40,000 40,000 2,190 18,730 46.83% 20,154 ‐7.07% 430510 Business Tax Renewal Process 130,000 130,000 22,200 90,972 69.98% 93,965 ‐3.19% 430515 SB 1186 3,000 3,000 1,720 2,571 85.70% ‐ 3,789 32.15% FEES AND PERMITS ‐ TOTAL $ 3,037,300 $ 3,037,300 $ 201,426 $ 1,337,103 44.02% 2,451,075 $ ‐45.45% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT A - Page 7 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund434100 General Fines $ 600 $ 600 $ ‐ $ 18,170 3028.33% $ 485 3646.39% 434105 Motor Vehicle Fines 120,670 120,670 ‐ 20,777 17.22% 61,496 ‐66.21% 434110 Parking Citations 205,000 205,000 25,197 148,321 72.35% 152,822 ‐2.95% 434115 DMV Parking Collections 70,300 70,300 3,815 32,721 46.54% 25,210 29.79% 434120 Administrative Citations 15,000 15,000 240 3,700 24.67% ‐ 6,194 40.26% FINES AND FORFEITURES ‐ TOTAL $ 411,570 $ 411,570 $ 29,252 $ 223,689 54.35% 246,207 $ ‐9.15%

FINES AND FORFEITURES
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT A - Page 8 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund435100 Interest Earned $ 185,000 $ 185,000 $ ‐ $ 71,192 38.48% 116,871 $ ‐39.08% 435110 Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐ ‐ (122,685) (250,345) ** ‐ (87,553) 185.94% 435200 Interest on Loan to Landscape District Fund 16,570 ‐ 16,570 10,882 65.67% ‐ 100.00% 436125 Indoor Facility Rental ‐ ‐ 13,118 18,569 ** ‐ (3,144) 690.62% 436127 Outdoor Picnic Shelters 7,450 7,450 665 12,745 171.07% ‐ 100.00% 436135 Pac Bell Mobile Svcs‐Rent 20,855 20,855 1,788 12,297 58.96% 10,219 20.33% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY ‐ TOTAL $ 229,875 $ 229,875 $ (107,114) $ (124,660) ‐54.23% $ ‐ 36,393 442.54%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
ATTACHMENT A - Page 9 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund432256 Grant (non‐government agency) $ 4,200 $ 74,200 $ 9,893 $ 84,407 113.76% 131,755 $ ‐35.94% 437100 Sale Of Publications ‐ ‐ ‐ 121 ** 3 3933.33%
437105 Firework Services 475 475 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
437125 Donations ‐ 800 ‐ 800 100.00% 850 ‐6.25%437135 Expense Reimbursement ‐ ‐ ‐ 39,292 ** 7,500 80.91% 437137 Loan Repayment from Landscape Maintenance District 164,025 164,025 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 437195 Other Revenue 30,000 30,000 76 7,565 25.22% ‐ 27,623 72.61% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE ‐ TOTAL $ 198,700 $ 269,500 $ 9,969 $ 132,185 49.05% 167,731 $ ‐21.19%

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT A - Page 10 of 11
FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 % Change
Adopted Amended Activity During Year To Date FY 2020/21 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget January Actual * % of Budget Actual Prior Year 101 General Fund439211 Transfer From Gas Tax Fund $ 205,000 $ 205,000 $ 17,083 $ 119,583 58.33% $ 70,292 41.22%439223 Transfer From Protective Services Fund 375,000 375,000 24,481 217,697 58.05% 252,770 ‐16.11% 439242 Transfer Fr Supp Law Enf Grant 150,000 150,000 12,500 87,500 58.33% 54,594 37.61% 439285 Transfer From Housing Authority ‐ 890,000 ‐ 890,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% TRANSFERS IN ‐ TOTAL $ 730,000 $ 1,620,000 $ 54,064 $ 1,314,780 81.16% 377,656 $ 71.28%

TRANSFERS IN
January 2022 General Fund Revenues (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
ATTACHMENT A - Page 11 of 11
Division
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
1100 City Council $ 116,710 $ 116,710 $ 5,017 $ 73,478 62.96% $ 57,465 27.87% 1200 City Attorney 302,000 302,000 136 138,534 45.87% 80,567 71.95% 1300 City Manager 473,195 473,195 39,076 274,691 58.05% 242,564 13.24% 1400 City Clerk 190,515 190,515 13,145 101,926 53.50% 97,295 4.76% 1410 Personnel/Risk Management 176,885 176,885 12,641 88,298 49.92% 76,133 15.98% 1510 Information Technology 524,980 531,098 12,331 304,643 57.36% 331,602 ‐8.13% Administration 1,784,285 1,790,403 82,346 981,570 54.82% 885,626 10.83% 1500 Finance 862,565 890,691 67,708 458,100 51.43% 454,800 0.73% 1600 Non‐Dept (excludes Transfers) 48,000 48,000 ‐ 446 0.93% ‐ 21,220 97.90% Finance 910,565 938,691 67,708 458,546 48.85% 476,020 ‐3.67% 1520 Emergency Preparedness 5,000 57,796 11,160 29,163 50.46% ‐ 100.00%2100 Law Enforcement 12,197,850 12,197,850 1,021,032 7,130,744 58.46% 6,604,098 7.39% 2200 Fire Protection 5,166,860 5,166,860 20,557 2,587,332 50.08% 2,454,530 5.41% 2230 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 100 200 8.00% 1,286 ‐84.45% 2400 Animal Control Services 191,390 191,390 ‐ 94,925 49.60% 136,710 ‐44.02%2500 Public Safety‐Other 110,175 110,175 5,813 72,963 66.22% 68,837 5.99% 4300 Parking Control 250,890 250,890 23,139 145,215 57.88% 131,843 10.14%6200 Code Enforcement 519,870 519,870 39,201 273,387 52.59% 266,865 2.44% Public Safety 18,444,535 18,497,331 1,121,002 10,333,929 55.87% 9,664,169 6.93% 3000 Public Works Administration 507,575 521,468 35,840 267,899 51.37% 268,653 ‐0.28% 3100 Engineering 145,390 162,110 6,013 43,437 26.79% ‐ 81,118 46.45% 3200 Public Facilities 436,340 441,620 27,016 231,577 52.44% 204,387 13.30% 3300 Crossing Guard 43,165 43,165 4,953 18,534 42.94% 3,123 83.15% 3400 Parks Maintenance 412,680 443,580 25,099 211,039 47.58% 190,026 11.06%3500 Street Maintenance 498,980 498,980 36,607 191,793 38.44% 216,553 ‐11.43% 3600 Storm Drains 115,860 115,860 24,118 70,899 61.19% ‐ 74,403 4.71%6300 Graffiti Abatement 101,900 101,900 4,810 22,950 22.52% ‐ 45,597 49.67% Public Works 2,261,890 2,328,683 164,456 1,058,128 45.44% 1,083,860 ‐2.37% City of Stanton
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
% Change
from Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 1 of 23 Click here to return to the agenda.

Division
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
City of Stanton
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
% Change
from Prior
Year
4000 Community Development Administration 313,625 313,625 17,538 168,495 53.72% 96,435 74.72% 4100 Planning 344,590 607,787 21,127 276,104 45.43% 250,350 10.29%4200 Building Regulation 784,255 787,455 6,131 218,581 27.76% 400,425 ‐45.41%4400 Business Relations 37,800 37,800 ‐ 570 1.51% 269 111.90% Community Development 1,480,270 1,746,667 44,796 663,750 38.00% 747,479 ‐11.20% 5000 Public Information Office (1) 120,600 120,850 10,577 63,224 52.32% 750 98.81% 5100 Community Services Administration 509,015 579,265 31,756 349,763 60.38% 365,929 ‐4.42% 5200 Community Center Operations 170,530 170,530 7,397 45,838 26.88% 2,553 1695.46%5300 Park Operations 224,470 224,470 17,695 118,203 52.66% 86,182 37.16% 5400 Senior Citizen Programs 61,515 61,815 3,514 29,335 47.46% 23,270 26.06% 5500 Recreation Programs (1) 48,900 48,900 7,579 32,725 66.92% 7,541 76.96% Community Services 1,135,030 1,205,830 78,518 639,088 53.00% 486,225 31.44% Transfer to FACT Grant 17,100 17,100 ‐ 7,125 41.67% ‐ 14,438 102.64% Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 10,565 10,565 602 4,275 40.46% 1,957 118.45% Transfer to SCP Maintenance 41,140 41,140 3,428 23,998 58.33% ‐ 100.00% Transfers to Other Funds 68,805 68,805 4,030 35,398 51.45% 16,395 115.91% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 26,085,380 $ 26,576,410 $ 1,562,856 $ 14,170,409 53.32% 13,359,774 $ 6.07% (1) ‐ New division in the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Adopted Budget. * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B - Page 2 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund1100 City Council501105 Salaries‐Elected $ 52,200 $ 52,200 $ 4,023 $ 30,123 57.71% 28,614 $ 5.27% 502120 Medicare/Fica 740 740 58 437 59.05% 415 5.30%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 770 770 61 515 66.88% 296 73.99% 602100 Special Dept Expense 10,000 10,000 720 6,372 63.72% 2,872 121.87% 602110 Office Expense 2,000 2,000 155 303 15.15% 466 ‐34.98% 602115 Postage ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 ** 5 ‐40.00%607100 Membership/Dues 36,585 36,585 ‐ 27,732 75.80% 18,137 52.90% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 11,000 11,000 ‐ 5,073 46.12% 3,125 38.40% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 3,415 3,415 ‐ 2,920 85.51% 3,535 ‐21.06% 1100 City Council Total 116,710 116,710 5,017 73,478 62.96% 57,465 27.87% 1200 City Attorney608105 Professional Services 302,000 302,000 136 138,534 45.87% 80,567 71.95%1200 City Attorney Total 302,000 302,000 136 138,534 45.87% 80,567 71.95%1300 City Manager501110 Salaries‐Regular 269,710 269,710 27,483 155,985 57.83% 132,584 17.65% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 141 ** ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 79,735 79,735 6,483 38,767 48.62% 32,416 19.59% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 6,250 6,250 544 3,089 49.42% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 25,545 25,545 3,606 19,321 75.64% 11,617 66.32% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,100 2,100 (85) 425 20.24% 440 ‐3.53% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 525 525 352 352 67.05% 476 ‐26.05% 502120 Medicare/Fica 3,580 3,580 393 2,244 62.68% 1,921 16.81% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,730 1,730 242 1,373 79.36% 66 95.19% 602110 Office Expense 1,200 1,200 ‐ 2,308 192.33% 3,887 ‐40.62% 602115 Postage 250 250 ‐ 2 0.80% 14 ‐600.00%607100 Membership/Dues 800 800 ‐ 926 115.75% 400 56.80% Administration ‐ Vazquez
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 3 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Administration ‐ Vazquez
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
1300 City Manager, Continued
607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 5,600 5,600 ‐ 1,865 33.30% 299 83.97% 608105 Professional Services 48,000 48,000 ‐ 24,000 50.00% 28,265 ‐17.77% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 700 700 58 408 58.29% 414 ‐1.47% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 27,470 27,470 ‐ 23,485 85.49% 29,602 ‐26.05% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 163 ‐100.00% 1300 City Manager Total 473,195 473,195 39,076 274,691 58.05% 242,564 13.24% 1400 City Clerk501110 Salaries‐Regular 110,905 110,905 8,225 58,101 52.39% 57,891 0.36% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 211 ** 133 58.65% 502100 Retirement 34,480 34,480 2,769 19,557 56.72% 18,364 6.50% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,985 1,985 163 1,150 57.93% ‐ 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 19,080 19,080 1,578 9,988 52.35% 9,247 8.01% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 330 330 161 161 48.79% 243 ‐33.74% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,550 1,550 114 813 52.45% 800 1.63% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 965 965 72 511 52.95% 29 94.32% 602110 Office Expense 2,250 2,250 ‐ 1,515 67.33% 334 77.95% 602115 Postage 500 500 15 268 53.60% 244 8.96%
602120 Books/Periodicals 100 100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 60 ‐100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,130 1,130 ‐ 415 36.73% 520 ‐25.30% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 750 750 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐ 70 2.80% ‐ 100.00%608105 Professional Services 6,000 6,000 ‐ 1,981 33.02% 3,047 ‐34.99%608140 Elections 360 360 ‐ 820 227.78% (1,179) ‐169.55%612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 580 580 48 338 58.28% 341 ‐0.89% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 7,050 7,050 ‐ 6,027 85.49% 7,221 ‐19.81%1400 City Clerk Total 190,515 190,515 13,145 101,926 53.50% 97,295 4.76% 1510 Information Technology
501110 Salaries‐Regular 81,120 81,120 5,744 44,843 55.28% 40,193 11.57% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 4 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Administration ‐ Vazquez
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
1510 Information Technology, Continued
501115 Salaries‐Overtime 10,000 10,000 323 3,034 30.34% 6,360 ‐52.30% 502100 Retirement Charges 22,940 22,940 1,934 14,330 62.47% 12,779 12.14% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,320 1,320 114 888 67.27% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 19,550 19,550 1,044 8,400 42.97% 7,785 7.90% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 300 300 140 140 46.67% 210 ‐33.33% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,080 1,080 81 637 58.98% 621 2.58% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 680 680 51 395 58.09% 20 1875.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies 15,000 15,000 ‐ 5,112 34.08% 4,456 14.72% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 25,000 25,000 ‐ 11,340 45.36% 14,581 ‐28.58% 604100 Communications 97,900 97,900 1,815 42,909 43.83% 33,811 21.20% 608100 Contractual Services 244,925 244,925 1,085 167,081 68.22% 106,697 56.59% 608145 Information Technology ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 23,372 ‐100.00% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 5,165 5,165 ‐ 4,416 85.50% ‐ 100.00%701050 Computer Software ‐ 6,118 ‐ 1,118 18.27% 41,617 ‐97.31% 701105 Equipment‐General ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 39,100 ‐100.00%
1510 Information Technology Total 524,980 531,098 12,331 304,643 57.36% 331,602 ‐8.13% TOTAL ADMINISTRATION‐VAZQUEZ $ 1,607,400 $ 1,613,518 $ 69,705 $ 893,272 55.36% 809,493 $ 10.35% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 5 of 23
Acct. No. Description
101 General Fund1410 Personnel/Risk Management501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 91,820 $ 91,820 $ 6,917 $ 47,205 51.41% 46,294 $ 1.97% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 244 ** ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 18,940 18,940 1,617 11,032 58.25% 10,278 7.34% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,590 1,590 137 935 58.81% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 16,075 16,075 1,344 7,571 47.10% 7,314 3.51% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ ‐ 500 ** 101 395.05% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 300 300 159 159 53.00% 198 ‐19.70% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,285 1,285 96 685 53.31% 674 1.63% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 800 800 61 415 51.88% 23 1704.35% 602110 Office Expense 1,400 1,400 ‐ 33 2.36% 227 ‐85.46% 602115 Postage 200 200 4 86 43.00% 72 16.28%
607100 Membership/Dues 725 725 ‐ 425 58.62% 300 29.41% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 2,000 2,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **607115 Training 6,000 6,000 ‐ ‐ (140) 2.33% ‐ 100.00% 607120 Education Reimbursement Program 10,000 10,000 625 625 6.25% ‐ 100.00% 608105 Professional Services 10,000 10,000 971 5,854 58.54% 7,017 ‐16.57% 608125 Advertising/ Business Dev't 1,800 1,800 ‐ 2,117 117.61% 75 2722.67% 609125 Employee/Volunteer Recognition 7,500 7,500 659 5,203 69.37% 3,201 62.54% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 610 610 51 356 58.36% 359 ‐0.84% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 5,840 5,840 ‐ 4,993 85.50% ‐ 100.00% TOTAL ADMINISTRATION‐GUZMAN $ 176,885 $ 176,885 $ 12,641 $ 88,298 49.92% 76,133 $ 15.98% Administration ‐ Guzman
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
% of Budget Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 6 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund1500 Finance501110 Salaries‐Regular 466,220 $ $ 469,790 $ 34,938 $ 244,440 52.03% 229,099 $ 6.70% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 500 ‐ 500 116 23.20% ‐ 100.00%501120 Salaries‐Part Time 42,415 38,575 5,066 25,477 66.05% 29,733 ‐14.31%502100 Retirement 112,590 112,860 9,329 65,373 57.92% 58,247 12.23% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 8,960 8,960 792 5,344 59.64% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 53,520 53,520 4,117 26,122 48.81% 22,980 13.67% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,920 4,920 505 3,535 71.85% 506 85.69% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,935 1,935 774 774 40.00% 1,834 ‐57.80%502120 Medicare/FICA 7,120 7,120 501 3,371 47.35% 3,245 3.88%502130 Other Benefit Charges 4,470 4,470 310 2,164 48.41% 543 74.91% 602110 Office Expense 8,000 8,000 ‐ 568 7.10% 1,064 ‐46.62%602115 Postage 5,000 5,000 309 2,263 45.26% 1,954 13.65%602120 Books/Periodicals 415 415 ‐ 38 9.16% ‐ 100.00%607100 Membership/Dues 795 795 ‐ 302 37.99% 110 63.58% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 4,200 4,200 (75) 1,953 46.50% ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 1,700 1,700 ‐ 410 24.12% 150 173.33%608105 Professional Services 88,035 116,161 8,913 41,092 35.38% 22,704 44.75%608107 Financial Services 17,600 17,600 1,608 5,802 32.97% 8,532 ‐32.00%608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 35,287 ‐100.00%611116 Payment to Other Agencies ‐ ‐ 519 587 ** 470 24.89% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 1,220 1,220 102 712 58.36% 720 ‐1.12%612115 Liability Insurance Charge 32,350 32,350 ‐ 27,657 85.49% 37,622 ‐36.03%702100 Furniture‐Office 600 600 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 1500 Finance Total 862,565 890,691 67,708 458,100 51.43% 454,800 0.73% Finance‐Bannigan
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 7 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Finance‐Bannigan
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
1600 Non‐Departmental602100 Special Dept Expense 3,000 3,000 ‐ 446 14.87% 19,600 ‐4294.62% 602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** ‐ 1,620 100.00% 611105 Revenue Sharing‐City of Anaheim 40,000 40,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 611116 Payment to Other Agencies 5,000 ‐ 5,000 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 1600 Non‐Departmental Total 48,000 48,000 ‐ 446 0.93% 21,220 ‐97.90% TOTAL FINANCE $ 910,565 $ 938,691 $ 67,708 $ 458,546 48.85% 476,020 $ ‐3.67% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 8 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund1520 Emergency Services602140 Materials & Supplies 5,000 $ $                ‐ 5,000 $ $ 55 1.10% $ ‐ 100.00%608105 Professional Services ‐ 52,796 11,160 29,108 55.13% ‐ 100.00% 1520 Emergency Services 5,000 57,796 11,160 29,163 50.46% ‐ 100.00% 2100 Law Enforcement
602100 Special Dept Expense 3,000 3,000 ‐                 ‐                   0.00%                    ‐ 678 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,500 1,500 ‐                 1,170 78.00% 353 69.83%602145 Gas/Oil/Lube 3,000 3,000 ‐                 323 10.77%                    ‐ 634 96.28% 603125 Vehicle Maintenance ‐ ‐                    ‐                 ‐                   **                 ‐ 4,490 100.00% 604100 Communications 36,030 36,030 ‐                 14,716 40.84% 14,867               ‐1.02% 608100 Contractual Services 18,350 18,350 1,529 10,703 58.33% 15,046               ‐28.86% 608160 O.C.S.D. Contract 8,629,270 8,629,270 710,583 5,001,518 57.96% 2,953,250 69.36% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 8,700 8,700 725 5,075 58.33%                 ‐ 5,145 1.38%702100 Furniture‐Office ‐ ‐                    ‐                 ‐                   **                    ‐ 108 100.00%2100 Law Enforcement Total 8,699,850 8,699,850 712,837 5,033,505 57.86% 2,994,571 40.51% 2200 Fire Protection602100 Special Department Expense 40,800 40,800 20,557 20,557 50.38% ‐ 100.00% 608185 O.C.F.A. Contract 3,626,060 3,626,060 ‐                 1,855,286 51.17% 1,855,091 0.01% 2200 Fire Protection Total 3,666,860 3,666,860 20,557 1,875,843 51.16% 1,855,091 1.11% 2230 Ambulance Services608190 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 100 200 8.00%                 ‐ 1,286 84.45%2230 Ambulance Services Total 2,500 2,500 100 200 8.00%                 ‐ 1,286 84.45%2400 Animal Control Services 608170 Animal Control Services 191,390 191,390 ‐                 94,925 49.60% 136,710             ‐44.02% 2400 Animal Control Services Total 191,390 191,390 ‐                 94,925 49.60% 136,710 ‐44.02% 2500 Public Safety‐Other
501110 Salaries‐Regular 58,390 58,390 4,038 33,209 56.87% 27,644 20.13% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time ‐ ‐                    ‐                 ‐                   **                 ‐ 4,445 100.00% % Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 9 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
2500 Public Safety‐Other, Continued502100 Retirement Charges 11,765 11,765 980 6,906 58.70% 6,887 0.28% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 945 945 80 566 59.89% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 705 705 35 227 32.20% ‐ 292 22.26% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,100 2,100 88 1,138 54.19% 175 84.62% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 105 105 56 56 53.33% ‐ 78 39.29% 502120 Medicare/FICA 785 785 60 431 54.90% ‐ 482 10.58%502130 Other Benefit Charges 375 375 36 251 66.93% 78 68.92% 602100 Special Department Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ 100 ** ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,200 1,200 ‐ 372 31.00% ‐ 771 51.75% 602115 Postage 250 250 ‐ 1 0.40% ‐ 101 99.01% 602135 Safety Equipment ‐ ‐ 440 876 ** ‐ 100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies ‐ ‐ ‐ 64 ** ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 700 700 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
608100 Contractual Services 4,680 4,680 ‐ 4,678 99.96% ‐ 100.00%612115 Liability Insurance Charge 28,175 28,175 ‐ 24,088 85.49% 27,884 ‐15.76% 2500 Public Safety‐Other Total 110,175 110,175 5,813 72,963 66.22% 68,837 5.99% 4300 Parking Control501110 Salaries‐Regular 142,590 142,590 10,498 75,394 52.87% 74,254 1.54% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 33 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 12,350 12,350 1,108 7,474 60.52% 7,097 5.31% 502100 Retirement 36,055 36,055 3,171 22,609 62.71% 21,528 5.02% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,735 2,735 230 1,641 60.00% ‐ 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 14,050 14,050 1,130 7,176 51.07% 6,681 7.41% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,140 4,140 308 2,378 57.44% 345 85.49%502115 Unemployment Insurance 705 705 258 258 36.60% ‐ 347 34.50% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,220 2,220 171 1,224 55.14% 1,198 2.17% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,445 1,445 93 667 46.16% 139 79.16% 602110 Office Expense 6,500 6,500 ‐ 5,302 81.57% 154 97.10% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 10 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
4300 Parking Control, Continued
602115 Postage 500 500 10 130 26.00% 89 31.54%
602130 Clothing 4,500 4,500 ‐ 129 2.87% ‐ 100.00%604100 Communications 1,000 1,000 55 255 25.50% 600 ‐135.29%608105 Professional Services 15,000 15,000 5,515 16,403 109.35% 17,314 ‐5.55% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 7,100 7,100 592 4,142 58.34% 2,097 49.37%4300 Parking Control Total 250,890 250,890 23,139 145,215 57.88% 131,843 10.14%6200 Code Enforcement501110 Salaries‐Regular 330,660 330,660 24,365 173,292 52.41% 165,375 4.79% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 12,350 12,350 1,108 7,474 60.52% 6,713 11.34% 502100 Retirement 82,925 82,925 6,870 48,735 58.77% 45,388 7.37% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 6,050 6,050 504 3,579 59.16% ‐ 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 40,430 40,430 3,580 22,895 56.63% 20,891 9.59% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,560 4,560 255 2,535 55.59% 380 85.01%502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,290 1,290 537 537 41.63% ‐ 718 33.71% 502120 Medicare/FICA 4,835 4,835 364 2,605 53.88% 2,470 5.47% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 3,010 3,010 215 1,529 50.80% 179 88.29% 602110 Office Expense 1,500 1,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 332 100.00% 602115 Postage 1,000 1,000 2 336 33.60% ‐ 459 36.61%602160 Code Enforcement Equipment 8,000 8,000 ‐ 108 1.35% ‐ 100.00% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 604100 Communications 800 800 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 624 100.00%607100 Membership/Dues 800 800 ‐ 380 47.50% ‐ 100.00%607105 Mileage Reimbursement 100 100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,500 1,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ 250 25.00% 71 71.60%608100 Contractual Services 4,000 4,000 315 1,890 47.25% 1,890 0.00% 608105 Professional Services 5,000 5,000 331 1,943 38.86% 994 48.84% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 11 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
Public Safety‐Wren
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
6200 Code Enforcement, Continued
608180 Prosecution/Code Enforcement ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** ‐ 17,126 100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 9,060 9,060 755 5,285 58.33% 3,255 38.41%6200 Code Enforcement Total 519,870 519,870 39,201 273,387 52.59% 266,865 2.44% 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 13,446,535 $ 13,499,331 $ 812,807 $ 7,525,201 55.74% 5,455,203 $ 37.95% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)
2100 Law Enforcement
608160 O.C.S.D. Contract 3,498,000 3,498,000 308,195 2,097,239 59.96% 3,609,527 ‐41.90% 2100 Law Enforcement Total 3,498,000 3,498,000 308,195 2,097,239 59.96% 3,609,527 ‐41.90% 2200 Fire Protection608185 O.C.F.A. Contract 1,500,000 1,500,000 ‐ 711,489 47.43% 599,439 18.69% 2200 Fire Protection Total 1,500,000 1,500,000 ‐ 711,489 47.43% 599,439 18.69% 102 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TOTAL 4,998,000 $ $ 4,998,000 $ 308,195 $ 2,808,728 56.20% 4,208,96 $ 6 ‐33.27% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 18,444,535 $ $ 18,497,331 $ 1,121,002 $ 10,333,929 55.87% 9,664,169 $ 6.93% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 12 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund3000 Public Works Administration
501110 Salaries‐Regular 318,785 $ $ 329,551 $ 24,145 $ 148,156 44.96% 154,144 $ ‐3.88% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 16,710 16,710 1,248 8,716 52.16% 7,879 10.62% 502100 Retirement Charges 68,410 70,924 5,833 35,814 50.50% 34,942 2.50% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,820 6,037 503 3,106 51.45% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 50,580 50,720 2,537 15,858 31.27% 22,499 ‐29.52% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 600 600 550 2,850 475.00% 151 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,200 1,200 443 667 55.58% 590 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 4,575 4,732 368 2,273 48.03% 2,331 ‐2.49% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,680 2,779 213 1,308 47.07% 191 85.40% 608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ ‐ 16,480 ** ‐ 100.00%
612115 Liability Insurance Charge 38,215 38,215 ‐ 32,671 85.49% 45,926 ‐40.57% 3000 Public Works Administration Total 507,575 521,468 35,840 267,899 51.37% 268,653 ‐0.28% 3100 Engineering501110 Salaries‐Regular 39,040 47,830 3,555 17,764 37.14% 27,037 ‐34.30% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 553 ‐100.00% 502100 Retirement 8,525 11,140 829 3,557 31.93% 6,133 ‐42.00% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 715 965 70 352 36.48% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 8,920 10,460 508 1,640 15.68% 6,302 ‐73.98% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 135 195 81 138 70.77% 125 9.42% 502120 Medicare/FICA 565 695 51 253 36.40% 373 ‐47.43%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 360 445 31 156 35.06% 14 91.03% 602110 Office Expense 2,100 2,100 ‐ 76 3.62% ‐ 100.00%
602115 Postage ‐ ‐ 1 14 ** 321 ‐95.64%
602140 Materials & Supplies 2,500 2,500 49 634 25.36% 281 125.62% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,850 1,850 ‐ 900 48.65% 384 57.33% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,300 1,300 ‐ 21 1.62% ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** % Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 13 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
3100 Engineering, Continued608105 Professional Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 2,892 ‐100.00%608110 Engineering Services 44,400 47,650 ‐ 15,987 33.55% 24,249 ‐34.07% 608120 Plan Checking Services 33,300 33,300 781 1,548 4.65% 12,051 ‐87.15% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 680 680 57 397 58.38% 403 ‐1.51% 3100 Engineering Total 145,390 162,110 6,013 43,437 26.79% 81,118 ‐46.45%3200 Public Facilities501110 Salaries‐Regular 21,950 21,950 5,001 34,353 156.51% 12,875 166.82% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 300 300 50 491 163.67% 74 84.93% 502100 Retirement 5,185 5,185 1,166 8,015 154.58% 2,923 174.20% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 425 425 99 680 160.00% ‐ 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 4,820 4,820 784 4,556 94.52% 2,377 91.67% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 150 150 116 150 100.00% 58 61.33% 502120 Medicare/FICA 305 305 73 505 165.57% 187 170.05% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 200 200 44 302 151.00% 6 4933.33% 602100 Special Dept Expense 7,885 7,885 287 651 8.26% 2,521 ‐74.18% 602110 Office Expense 2,100 2,100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 54 ‐100.00% 602130 Clothing 3,500 3,500 (58) 1,775 50.71% 2,919 ‐39.19% 602135 Safety Equipment 500 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 563 ‐100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies 8,000 8,000 441 2,094 26.18% 3,371 ‐37.88%603110 Building Maintenance 123,240 123,240 6,338 38,410 31.17% 43,399 ‐11.50% 604100 Communications 35,000 35,000 ‐ 2,817 8.05% 2,718 3.64% 604105 Utilities 140,000 140,000 10,848 85,152 60.82% 84,274 1.03% 608100 Contractual Services 65,000 70,280 1,522 35,506 50.52% 26,200 35.52% 611110 O.C. Sanitation District User Fee 14,120 14,120 ‐ 13,985 99.04% 17,704 ‐26.59% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 3,660 3,660 305 2,135 58.33% 2,164 ‐1.36%3200 Public Facilities Total 436,340 441,620 27,016 231,577 52.44% 204,387 13.30% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 14 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
3300 Crossing Guard
608175 Crossing Guard Services 43,165 43,165 4,953 18,534 42.94% 3,123 83.15% 3300 Crossing Guard Total 43,165 43,165 4,953 18,534 42.94% 3,123 83.15%3400 Parks Maintenance 501110 Salaries‐Regular 75,595 75,595 5,317 39,887 52.76% 33,094 20.53% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 2,500 2,500 119 1,882 75.28% 1,387 35.69% 502100 Retirement 15,705 15,705 1,240 9,274 59.05% 7,456 24.38% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,320 1,320 105 790 59.85% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 11,420 11,420 891 6,511 57.01% 4,920 32.34% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 840 840 70 472 56.19% 70 85.17% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 405 405 127 156 38.52% 157 ‐0.64% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,060 1,060 80 612 57.74% 504 21.43% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 680 680 47 351 51.62% 17 95.16%602100 Special Dept Expense 5,000 5,000 ‐ 595 11.90% 188 216.49% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 15,000 15,000 ‐ 8,180 54.53% 7,887 3.71% 604105 Utilities 176,000 176,000 10,375 90,799 51.59% 85,017 6.37% 605100 Land Lease 3,000 33,900 ‐ 3,259 9.61% 5,161 ‐36.85% 608100 Contractual Services 99,700 99,700 6,357 45,672 45.81% 41,534 9.96% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 4,455 4,455 371 2,599 58.34% 2,634 ‐1.33% 3400 Parks Maintenance Total 412,680 443,580 25,099 211,039 47.58% 190,026 11.06% 3500 Street Maintenance
501110 Salaries‐Regular 106,230 106,230 6,329 49,577 46.67% 51,764 ‐4.22% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 4,000 4,000 218 2,697 67.43% 1,632 65.26% 502100 Retirement 23,180 23,180 1,473 11,437 49.34% 11,730 ‐2.50% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,930 1,930 125 982 50.88% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 16,000 16,000 1,223 8,306 51.91% 7,528 10.33% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,310 2,310 193 1,299 56.23% 193 85.14% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 615 615 155 209 33.98% 234 ‐11.96% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,515 1,515 98 776 51.22% 784 ‐1.02% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 15 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works ‐ Ames
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
3500 Street Maintenance, Continued
502130 Other Benefit Charges 970 970 56 436 44.95% 26 94.04% 602100 Special Dept Expense 3,000 3,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 602125 Small Tools 4,000 4,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 921 ‐100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies 65,000 65,000 ‐ 9,836 15.13% 30,663 ‐67.92% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 2,000 2,000 ‐ 999 49.95% ‐ 100.00% 608100 Contractual Services 190,000 190,000 24,705 94,092 49.52% 105,315 ‐10.66% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 18,230 18,230 1,519 10,634 58.33% 5,763 45.81% 710190 Pavement Maintenance 60,000 60,000 513 513 0.86% ‐ 100.00% 3500 Street Maintenance Total 498,980 498,980 36,607 191,793 38.44% 216,553 ‐11.43% 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance
608155 Storm Water Monitor Program 115,860 115,860 24,118 70,899 61.19% 74,403 ‐4.71% 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance Total 115,860 115,860 24,118 70,899 61.19% 74,403 ‐4.71% 6300 Graffiti Abatement501110 Salaries‐Regular 38,570 38,570 1,226 4,215 10.93% 20,566 ‐387.92% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 8,000 8,000 99 869 10.86% 222 74.45%502100 Retirement Charges 8,935 8,935 282 962 10.77% 4,663 ‐384.72%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 735 735 24 83 11.29% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 8,215 8,215 299 1,041 12.67% 3,801 ‐265.13% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 255 255 30 37 14.51% 95 ‐156.76% 502120 Medicare/FICA 540 540 19 74 13.70% 300 ‐305.41%502130 Other Benefit Charges 350 350 11 37 10.57% 10 72.97%602140 Materials & Supplies 15,000 15,000 1,473 7,138 47.59% 6,951 2.69% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 7,500 7,500 197 444 5.92% 831 ‐46.57%612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 13,800 13,800 1,150 8,050 58.33% 8,158 ‐1.34% 6300 Graffiti Abatement Total 101,900 101,900 4,810 22,950 22.52% 45,597 100.00% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS $ 2,261,890 $ 2,328,683 $ 164,456 $ 1,058,128 45.44% 1,083,860 $ ‐2.37% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 16 of 23
Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
101 General Fund4000 Community Development Administration 501110 Salaries‐Regular 177,760 $ $ 177,760 $ 12,732 $ 89,296 50.23% 41,015 $ 117.72% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime                  ‐                 ‐ ‐ 176 ** ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement Charges 52,005 52,005 3,062 21,214 40.79% 10,456 102.89% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,280 4,280 252 1,768 41.31% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 17,810 17,810 980 7,264 40.79% 4,440 63.60% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 345 345 172 172 49.86% 253 ‐32.02% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,315 2,315 179 1,272 54.95% 575 121.22% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,145 1,145 112 786 68.65% 21 97.33% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 49 777 77.70% 843 ‐7.83% 602120 Books/Periodicals 1,200 1,200 ‐ 178 14.83% 337 ‐89.33% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,600 1,600 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings ‐ ‐                 ‐ 22 ** ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 1,200 1,200 ‐ 289 24.08% ‐ 100.00%
612115 Liability Insurance Charge 52,965 52,965 ‐ 45,281 85.49% 38,261 15.50% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 234 ‐100.00%
4000 Community Development Administration Total 313,625 313,625 17,538 168,495 53.72% 96,435 74.72% 4100 Planning501110 Salaries‐Regular 207,355 204,825 14,665 115,871 56.57% 135,471 ‐14.47% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 1,200 1,200 58 695 57.92% 870 ‐20.11% 501125 Salaries‐Appointed 9,000 9,000 692 5,192 57.69% 4,171 24.48% 502100 Retirement 65,640 65,415 3,298 26,616 40.69% 29,768 ‐10.59% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,655 5,655 290 2,294 40.57% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 29,995 29,580 1,363 13,603 45.99% 16,444 ‐17.28% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 900 900 339 345 38.33% 966 ‐64.29% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,140 3,110 223 1,763 56.69% 2,000 ‐11.85% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,095 2,095 129 1,020 48.69% 68 93.33% 602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐                 ‐ 49 ** (185) 477.55% Community Development‐Lilley
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During January
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 17 of 23
Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Community Development‐Lilley
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During January
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
4100 Planning, Continued
602115 Postage 750 750 19 195 26.00% 556 ‐185.13%602140 Materials & Supplies 1,000                ‐                   1,000 ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 2,500 2,500 ‐                   721 28.84% 470 34.81% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 8,200 8,200 ‐                   114 1.39% 155 ‐26.45% 607115 Training 1,550 1,550 ‐                   ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 608100 Contractual Services 4,000 4,000 ‐                   1,706 42.65% ‐ 100.00% 608105 Professional Services ‐ 261,087 ‐                   105,564 40.43% 59,237 43.89% 608135 Microfilming 1,000 1,000 ‐                   ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 610 610 51 356 58.36% 359 ‐0.84% 4100 Planning Total 344,590 602,477 21,127 276,104 45.83% 250,350 10.29% 4200 Building Regulation501110 Salaries‐Regular 50,370 52,900 3,925 26,070 49.28% 35,976 ‐27.54% 502100 Retirement 14,085 14,310 917 6,093 42.58% 8,086 ‐24.65% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,130 1,130 78 516 45.66% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 9,760 10,175 779 4,841 47.58% 5,577 ‐13.20% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐                 15 198 ** ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 300 300 91 195 65.00% 173 12.72% 502120 Medicare/FICA 730 760 57 381 50.13% 507 ‐24.85%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 480 480 35 229 47.71% 18 92.14% 602110 Office Expense 200 200 ‐                   45 22.50% 114 ‐60.53% 602115 Postage 700 700 7 13 1.86% 96 ‐86.46%
602120 Books/Periodicals 500 500 ‐                   ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 607100 Membership/Dues 250 250 ‐                   ‐                  0.00% ‐ **607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 500 500 ‐                   ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐                   ‐ 0.00% 350 ‐100.00% 608115 Inspection Services 700,000 700,000 ‐                   179,638 25.66% 348,332 ‐48.43% 608135 Microfilming 2,000 2,000 ‐                   ‐                  0.00% ‐ ** * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 18 of 23
Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual
Community Development‐Lilley
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During January
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
4200 Building Regulation, Continued611116 Payment to Other Agencies 2,250 2,250 227 362 16.09% 1,196 ‐69.73% 4200 Building Regulation Total 784,255 787,455 6,131 218,581 27.76% 400,425 ‐45.41%4400 Business Relations607100 Membership/Dues 2,000 2,000 ‐ 570 28.50% ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
608100 Contractual Services 2,250 2,250 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **608105 Professional Services 15,000 15,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608145 Information Technology 3,750 3,750 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 250 ‐100.00% 609100 Special Events 12,300 12,300 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ **
610210 Business Relations Programs ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 19 ‐100.00% 4400 Business Relations 37,800 37,800 ‐ 570 1.51% 269 111.90% 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 1,480,270 $ 1,741,357 $ 44,796 $ 663,750 38.12% 747,479 $ ‐11.20% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)
4100 Planning608105 Professional Services ‐ ‐ 5,310 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 102 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TOTAL $ ‐ $ 5,310 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.00% $ ‐ ** TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $ 1,480,270 $ 1,746,667 $ 44,796 $ 663,750 38.00% 747,479 $ ‐11.20% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 19 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund5000 Public Information Office
501110 Salaries‐Regular 82,975 $ $ 82,975 $ 7,473 $ 43,768 52.75% $ ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement Charges 18,765 18,765 1,637 10,119 53.92% ‐ 100.00% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,575 1,575 148 867 55.05% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 12,445 12,445 973 6,382 51.28% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 375 375 172 172 45.87% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,190 1,190 108 634 53.28% ‐ 100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 775 775 66 385 49.68% ‐ 100.00% 602113 Social Media 2,500 2,500 ‐                645 25.80% 750 ‐16.28% 607100 Membership/Dues ‐ 250 ‐                252 100.80% ‐ 100.00% 5000 Public Information Office 120,600 120,850 10,577 63,224 52.32% 750 98.81% 5100 Community Services Administration
501110 Salaries‐Regular 279,875 279,875 20,627 143,505 51.27% 196,087 ‐26.82%501120 Salaries‐Part Time 1,840 1,840 289 2,171 117.99% 25,210 ‐91.39% 502100 Retirement 65,905 65,905 5,377 37,488 56.88% 48,531 ‐22.75% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,940 4,940 414 2,884 58.38% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 29,000 29,000 2,360 15,040 51.86% 23,410 ‐35.75%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 6,000 6,000 500 3,625 60.42% 750 79.31% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 900 900 385 388 43.11% 1,004 ‐61.35% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,890 3,890 294 2,063 53.03% 3,154 ‐34.59%502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,245 2,245 182 1,264 56.30% 461 63.53% 602100 Special Dept Expense 18,950 86,950 672 71,909 82.70% 2,427 2862.88% 602110 Office Expense 3,185 3,185 ‐                1,544 48.48% 743 107.81% 602115 Postage 500 500 2 362 72.40% 3,219 ‐789.23%
603110 Building Maintenance 10,485 10,485 ‐                1,125 10.73% ‐ 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,160 910 ‐                892 98.02% ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 1,500 1,500 ‐                295 19.67% ‐ 100.00% 609100 Special Events 11,500 14,000 ‐                9,939 70.99% 3,330 66.50% Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 20 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
5100 Community Services Administration, Continued
612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 7,845 7,845 654 4,576 58.33% 3,967 13.31% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 59,295 ‐ 59,295 50,693 85.49% 53,636 ‐5.81% 5100 Community Services Administration Total 509,015 579,265 31,756 349,763 60.38% 365,929 ‐4.42% 5200 Community Center Operations
501110 Salaries‐Regular 34,750 34,750 1,904 14,371 41.36% ‐ 100.00%501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 164 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 92,150 92,150 3,970 17,024 18.47% ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 14,905 14,905 552 3,841 25.77% ‐ 100.00% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,260 2,260 116 622 27.52% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 6,130 6,130 323 2,221 36.23% ‐ 100.00% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,700 2,700 250 1,625 60.19% ‐ 100.00% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,500 1,500 141 145 9.67% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,855 1,855 89 481 25.93% ‐ 100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,370 1,370 19 135 9.85% ‐ 100.00% 602100 Special Dept Expense 4,820 4,820 ‐ 2,081 43.17% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐ 451 45.10% ‐ 100.00% 603110 Building Maintenance 6,695 6,695 ‐ 2,447 36.55% 2,320 5.47% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 395 395 33 230 58.23% 233 ‐1.30% 5200 Community Center Operations 170,530 170,530 7,397 45,838 26.88% 2,553 94.43% 5300 Park Operations501110 Salaries‐Regular 76,300 76,300 5,331 37,584 49.26% 30,743 22.25% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ 50 1,741 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 102,715 102,715 9,152 58,264 56.72% 41,390 40.77% 502100 Retirement 15,310 15,310 1,246 8,783 57.37% 6,982 25.79%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 3,540 3,540 287 1,898 53.62% ‐ 100.00%502110 Health/Life Insurance 11,275 11,275 826 5,249 46.55% 4,181 25.54%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,000 2,000 200 850 42.50% 163 80.82% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 2,025 2,025 339 970 47.90% 696 39.37% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 21 of 23
Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
% Change
From Prior
Year
5300 Park Operations, Continued
502120 Medicare/FICA 2,545 2,545 213 1,427 56.07% 1,060 34.62% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 2,260 2,260 51 360 15.93% 611 ‐69.72% 602100 Special Dept Expense 5,500 5,500 ‐ 992 18.04% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐ 85 8.50% 356 ‐76.12% 5300 Park Operations 224,470 224,470 17,695 118,203 52.66% 86,182 37.16%5400 Senior Citizens Programs 501110 Salaries‐Regular 18,040 18,040 1,133 9,754 54.07% 4,109 137.38% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ 74 ** ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 31,995 31,995 1,610 13,423 41.95% 16,717 ‐19.70% 502100 Retirement 3,470 3,470 265 2,280 65.71% 933 144.37%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 880 880 54 459 52.16% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 2,890 2,890 192 1,453 50.28% 631 130.27%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 1,050 1,050 100 700 66.67% 100 85.71% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 600 600 65 65 10.83% 75 ‐13.33% 502120 Medicare/FICA 725 725 41 347 47.86% 310 11.94%
502130 Other Benefit Charges 665 665 11 93 13.98% 243 ‐161.29% 609200 Senior Citizen Program 1,200 1,500 43 687 45.80% 152 77.87% 5400 Senior Citizens Programs 61,515 61,815 3,514 29,335 47.46% 23,270 26.06% 5500 Recreation Programs602115 Postage 9,000 9,000 ‐ 6,216 69.07% ‐ 100.00% 602150 Recreation Brochure Mailing 23,100 23,100 ‐ 10,671 46.19% 7,541 29.33%608150 Contractual Recreation Program 16,800 16,800 7,579 15,838 94.27% ‐ 100.00% 5500 Recreation Programs 48,900 48,900 7,579 32,725 66.92% 7,541 76.96% 101 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES $ 1,135,030 $ 1,205,830 $ 78,518 $ 639,088 53.00% $ 486,225 31.44% * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 22 of 23
Acct. No.

Description
% of Budget
101 General Fund1600 Non‐Departmental800250 Transfer to FACT Grant $ 17,100 $ 17,100 $ ‐ $ 7,125 41.67% $ ‐ 14,438 102.64% 800251 Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 10,565 10,565 602 4,275 40.46% 1,957 118.45% 800280 Transfer to SCP Maintenance Fund 41,140 41,140 3,428 23,998 58.33% ‐ 100.00% TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT $ 68,805 $ 68,805 $ 4,030 $ 35,398 51.45% 16,395 $ 115.91% Transfers to Other Funds‐Bannigan
January 2022 General Fund Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2020/21
Actual
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
* = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT B-Page 23 of 23
Account
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year

REVENUES
435100 Interest $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ ‐ $ 15,616 10.41% $ ‐ 56,548 262.12% 435110 Unrealized Gains/Losses ‐ ‐ (35,136) (69,998) ** (41,039) 41.37% 436140 Tina Way/Pacific Ave. Property Rent 500,000 500,000 123,947 265,745 53.15% 291,201 ‐8.74%437135 Expense Reimbursement 2,000 2,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 1,171 ‐100.00% 437145 Sale Of Assets ‐ ‐ 75,000 681,902 ** 210,000 69.20% TOTAL REVENUES $ 652,000 $ 652,000 $ 163,811 $ 893,265 137.00% 517,881 $ 72.48%

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES
Salaries and Benefits
501110 Salaries‐Regular 259,540 143,180 9,786 69,981 48.88% 99,506                   ‐29.67% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime                ‐ 5,000 6 270 ** 215 20.37% 501120 Salaries‐Part‐Time 2,230 2,020 267 1,340 66.34% 1,228 9.12% 502100 Retirement 71,340 46,215 2,550 18,121 39.21%                   ‐ 22,731 20.28% 502105 Workers' Compensation 4,500 2,390 199 1,412 59.08% ‐ 100.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 36,455 16,770 1,171 7,481 44.61%                   ‐ 11,105 32.63% 502111 Medical in Lieu 480 480 30 390 81.25% 60 84.62%
502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,035 435 177 177 40.69% 974 ‐81.83% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,675 1,985 136 972 48.97% 1,394 ‐43.42% 502130 Other Benefits 2,205 1,125 86 616 54.76% 68 88.96% 608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ** 1,851 ‐100.00%
Total‐Salaries and Benefits 386,460 214,600 14,408 100,760 46.95% 139,132 ‐27.58%Maintenance and Operations 602100 Special Department Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ **                   ‐ 26,144 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 ‐ 147 14.70% ‐ 100.00% 602115 Postage 500 500 ‐ 14 2.80% 208 ‐93.27%
602140 Materials and Supplies 5,000 5,000 ‐                 546 10.92% ‐ 100.00% 602145 Gas/Oil/Lube ‐ ‐ ‐                 20 ** ‐ 100.00%603120 Minor Repairs 15,000 15,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% 5,346 ‐100.00% HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
January 2022 Revenues and Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
ATTACHMENT C - Page 1 of 2 Click here to return to the agenda.

Account
No. Description
FY 2021/22
Adopted
Budget
FY 2021/22
Amended
Budget
Activity
During
January
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2020/21
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
January 2022 Revenues and Expenditures (58% of year)
FY 2021/22
Maintenance and Operations , Continued
604105 Utilities 50,000 50,000 ‐                 25,553 51.11%                   ‐ 34,501 35.02% 607100 Membership Dues 5,300 5,300 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% 4,630 ‐100.00% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,000 1,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 608100 Contractual Services ‐ 2,457,940 1,168 313,370 12.75% 607,712 ‐93.93% 608105 Professional Services 437,000 410,000 15,267 107,109 26.12% 130,224 ‐21.58% 610135 Relocation Assistance 40,000 40,000 ‐                 17,388 43.47%                   ‐ 70,832 307.36% 610230 Navigation Center (North SPA) 30,000 30,000 ‐                 ‐ 0.00% ‐ ** 611110 O.C. Sanitation User Fee 21,400 21,400 ‐ 20,837 97.37% 20,933 ‐0.46% Total‐Maintenance and Operations 608,700 3,039,640 16,435 484,984 15.96% 900,530 ‐46.14% Allocated Charges
612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 10,075 10,075 840 5,877 58.33% 1,791 69.53% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 16,190 16,190 ‐                 13,841 85.49% ‐ 100.00%612140 Information Technology Charge 24,075 24,075 2,006 14,044 58.33% 10,331 26.44% 614205 Admin Overhead 40,100 20,850 1,546 11,111 53.29%                   ‐ 17,145 35.19% Total‐Allocated Charges 90,440 71,190 4,392 44,873 63.03% 29,267 53.32% Capital Outlay
760100 Demolition/Condemnation ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ **                   ‐ 43,686 100.00% 790100 Land Acquisition ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** 1,961,438 ‐100.00% Total‐Capital Outlay ‐ ‐ ‐                 ‐ ** 2,005,124 ‐100.00% Transfers to Other Funds
800101 Transfer to General Fund ‐ 890,000 ‐ 890,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% Total‐Transfers to Other Funds ‐ 890,000 ‐ 890,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,085,600 $ 4,215,430 $ 35,235 $ 1,520,617 36.07% 3,074,053 $         ‐50.53% REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES $ (433,600) $ (3,563,430) $ 128,576 $ (627,352) $ (2,556,172) * = Actual data is reported through January.

ATTACHMENT C - Page 2 of 2
Task Code Description
Adopted Budget
2021/22
FY 2020/21
Budget
Carryover
Other Budget
Adjustments
Amended
Budget
2021/22
YTD
Actual
2021/22 Encumbrances
% Spent
(Includes
Encumbrances)
Remaining
Budget
Street Projects
2021‐105 Traffic Signal Improvements ‐ Fiscal Year 2020/21 $ ‐ $ 200,740 $ 200,740 $ ‐ $ 109,784 54.7% $ 90,956 2022‐101 Citywide Street Rehabilitation ‐ Fiscal Year 2021/22 2,075,000 49,253 2,124,253 50,313 9,440 2.8% $ 2,064,500 2022‐102 Citywide Street Sign Replacement 150,000 ‐ 150,000 513 ‐ 0.3% 149,487 Total Street Projects $ 2,225,000 $ 249,993 $ ‐ $ 2,474,993 $ 50,826 $ 119,224 6.9% 2,304,943 $ Parks Projects
2021‐201 Park Master Plan $ ‐ $ 100,870 $ 100,870 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% $ 100,870 2021‐202 Hollenbeck Rubber Replacement ‐ 200,735 200,735 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 200,735 2021‐203 Premier Park Play Equipment and Rubber ‐ 200,735 200,735 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 200,735 2021‐204 Harry Dotson Rubber ‐ 70,510 70,510 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 70,510 2021‐205 Dog Park (design) 50,000 ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 50,0002022‐201 Family Resource Center Improvements 425,000 ‐ 425,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 425,000 2022‐202 Rehabilitate Building at Dotson Park 141,000 ‐ 141,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 141,000 Total Parks Projects $ 616,000 $ 572,850 $ ‐ $ 1,188,850 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% 1,188,850 $ Sewer
2022‐301 Sewer Master Plan Update $ 500,000 ‐ $ 50,000 $ 550,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% $ 550,000 Total Sewer $ 500,000 $ ‐ $ 50,000 $ 550,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.0% $ 550,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,341,000 $ 822,843 $ 50,000 $ 4,213,843 $ 50,826 $ 119,224 4.0% 4,043,793 $ Funding Source
211 Gas Tax Fund 381,431 $ ‐ $ $ 381,431 $ 513 $ ‐ 0.1% $ 380,918 215 Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) (SB‐1) 1,060,640 49,253 1,109,893 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 1,109,893 220 Measure M Turnback Fund 750,000 174,740 924,740 50,313 93,224 15.5% 781,203 222 CDBG Grant Fund 350,000 ‐ 350,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 350,000 262 Traffic Signal Impact Fees Fund ‐ 26,000 26,000 ‐ 26,000 100.0% ‐ 263 Community Center Impact Fees Fund 141,000 ‐ 141,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 141,000 305 Capital Projects Fund (Reserves) 32,929 ‐ 32,929 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 32,929 310 Park In‐Lieu Fund 125,000 572,850 697,850 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 697,850 501 Sewer Maintenance Fund 500,000 ‐ 50,000 550,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 550,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 3,341,000 $ 822,843 $ 50,000 $ 4,213,843 $ 50,826 $ 119,224 4.0% 4,043,793 $

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2021/22

STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
JULY 1, 2021 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2022
ATTACHMENT D Click here to return to the agenda.

CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: March 8, 2022
SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 AND RELATED AUDIT REPORTS
REPORT IN BRIEF:

Each year the City issues an Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), which summarizes the financial activity of a local government for a given fiscal year in accordance with financial statement presentation requirements prescribed by government accounting standards (Attachment A). The ACFR is accompanied by an opinion from the City’s audit firm. The audit firm’s opinion on the City’s 2020-21 ACFR is a clean opinion, with no exceptions, modifications, or qualifications. (The audit firm also issued a separate report for the Housing Authority’s 2020-21 audited financial statements. The report included in Attachment B also includes a clean opinion with no exceptions, modifications, or qualifications from the audit firm.) In addition, City’s auditors issue other reports in relation to the City’s audit. These reports are provided in Attachments C through E. (Attachment D, page 2 includes one recommendation that the City corrected during the Fiscal Year 2020-21 audit.)
There is one report that is outstanding for the Fiscal Year 2020-21 audit. The City’s auditors are currently completing the City’s single audit on federal expenditures in accordance with U.S. Department of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 for the 2020-21 fiscal year. The audit was delayed while the OMB was delayed in issuing its Single Audit A-133 Compliance Supplement the auditors utilize to complete the audit. This audit is expected to be completed by March 31, 2022. Staff will forward the audit report to the City Council when it’s available.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), and related audit reports.

Item: 12F
Click here to return to the agenda.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

An ACFR is organized into three sections: the introductory section, the financial section, and the statistical section. The introductory section includes a letter of transmittal that provides an overview of the City. The financial section includes the audit opinion, management’s discussion and analysis, government-wide financial statements, notes to the financial statements, and supplementary schedules. Management’s discussion and analysis provides narrative information as well as an overview and analysis of the City’s financial statements.

The statistical section provides operational and demographic statistics and ten years of selected financial data.

Government-wide Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements that are included in the ACFR provide the reader with an opportunity to ascertain the financial status of all funds and activities of the City in a single consolidated presentation. As of June 30, 2021, the City held $157.0 million in assets (Attachment A, page 41). Those assets consisted of cash and investments ($52.7 million), capital assets ($97.1 million), and receivables and prepaid expenses ($7.2 million).

The government-wide financial statements also display the obligations of the City that represent claims against those assets. As of June 30, 2021, the City owed $9.3 million consisting of short-term obligations ($2.0 million), long-term obligations ($0.5 million), the City’s unfunded pension liability for employee service rendered to date ($6.7 million), and the City’s unfunded liability for retiree medical benefits for employee service rendered to date ($0.1 million) (Attachment A, page 41).

The government-wide financial statements also report a consolidation of all revenues and expenses of the City. On a consolidated basis, City revenues exceeded expenses by $1.3 million (Attachment A, page 42).

Fiduciary funds are funds held on behalf of other parties. These funds (North Orange County Public Safety Task Force Fund and the Successor Agency to the Stanton Redevelopment Agency Fund) are excluded from the government-wide financial statements.

Fund Financial Statements
Local governments typically receive funding from multiple sources, some of which is restricted to specific uses and some of which is unrestricted. As a result, local governments establish separate funds to segregate the resources that are restricted for specific programs and activities. The fund financial statements that are contained in the ACFR display the financial activity of major funds in separate columns so that the reader can ascertain the revenues, expenditures, and remaining unspent fund balance of each of those major funds.

One of the City’s major funds is the General Fund. The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City that pays for much of the City’s day to day operating expenditures. The General Fund (Funds 101, 102, and 801) accounts for the unrestricted resources for the City, the spending of which can be directed by city Council toward any lawful public use. (Fund 801, the City’s Expendable Deposits Fund, is not included in the City’s General Fund revenue and expenditure report provided to the City Council monthly. The City’s auditors included in this fund with the General Fund for the ACFR due to a new government accounting standard that changed how this fund is reported.) As of June 30, 2021, the General Fund’s spendable fund balance was $21.7 million. Of this amount, $356,687 was set aside for expenditures that were budgeted in Fiscal Year 2020-21 that were delayed and will be spent in Fiscal Year 2021-22 and $13.0 million represents reserves set aside by the City Council with the adoption of Resolution No. 2020-27 for certain contingencies such as:
economic uncertainty, emergency equipment and maintenance, emergency disaster, and capital improvements. After accounting for those amounts, there was $8.4 million in the General Fund’s fund balance available for appropriation.

Housing Authority Audited Financial Statements (Attachment B) Staff transmitted this report to the City Council via email on December 30, 2021, in compliance with Senate Bill 341. The Housing Authority’s audited financial statements report that the Housing Authority’s net position (the amount that assets exceed liabilities) was $34.6 million as of June 30, 2021 (Attachment B, page 14). Most of the Housing Authority’s assets are in the form of cash and investments ($13.2 million) and capital assets (consisting of land and buildings and improvements) associated with the Tina-Pacific properties ($35.2 million). In Fiscal Year 2020-21, the Housing Authority’s expenditures exceeded revenues by $4.7 million (Attachment B, page 15). This is primarily due to the $2.6 million the Housing Authority funded for permanent supportive housing projects during Fiscal Year 2020-21.

Other Related Audit Reports
In addition to the audit firm’s opinion on the fair presentation of the City’s financial statements, audit firms are required to provide certain related audit communications whenever they perform an audit of local government financial statements. Those related audit communications are included as Attachments C through E to this agenda report. The content of these required audit communications is described below:
• Audit Process and Conclusions (Attachment C) – This report communicates the inherent limitations of the audit process, assumptions that underlie the financial reporting process for all local governments and identifies any material misstatements or difficulties that were detected in the performance of the audit. For Fiscal Year 2020-21, this report is a clean report with no such matters noted, except for one uncorrected adjustment reported on Attachment C, page 5. During Fiscal Year 2020- 21, the City transitioned the collection of rent payments for the Tina Pacific properties to Quality Management Group. After the City’s books were closed for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, City staff identified that $55,365 of rent was outstanding (unpaid by the tenants) as of June 30, 2021. As of December 1, 2021, $49,715 of this rent still remained unpaid.

The City did not record an adjustment to reflect this revenue in the City’s books for Fiscal Year 2020-21 because the collectability of the revenue is uncertain. Auditing standards require the City’s auditors to notify the City Council of adjustments that were not recorded by the City. Since the majority of the unrecorded revenue ($49,715 of the $55,365 total amount) was not collected, the net impact on the Housing Authority’s income statement is only $5,650, which is not material and did not impact the “clean audit opinion” on either the City or the Housing Authority’s audited financial statements.
• Internal Control and Compliance (Attachment D) – This report communicates to City Council any significant deficiencies in internal control or material instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations that were noted during the course of the audit. This report includes one recommendation regarding the City’s recording of Tina Pacific properties that were acquired in previous fiscal years. Staff corrected the recording in Fiscal Year 2020-21 (Attachment D, page 2).
• Article XIIIB Limit on Appropriations (Gann Limit) (Attachment E) – This report communicates the audit firm’s testing of the City’s computation of the statutory appropriation limit (Gann Limit). The auditors identified one clerical error in the computation of the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2020-21. The inflation factor staff used (1.0385) was slightly different than the inflation factor provided by the Department of Finance (1.0373). This resulted in the appropriations limit computed by the City differing from the auditors’ recalculation by $72,166 (less than 1% of the $62.4 million appropriations limit amount for Fiscal Year 2020-21) (Attachment E, page 2).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This action is not a project per the California Environmental Quality Act.

LEGAL REVIEW:

Not applicable.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the regular agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

4. Ensure Fiscal Stability and Efficiency in Governance Reviewed by: Approved by:
/s/ Michelle Bannigan /s/ Jarad L. Hildenbrand
_____________________ ____________________
Michelle Bannigan, CPA Jarad L. Hildenbrand
Finance Director City Manager
Attachments:

A. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
B. Housing Authority Financial Statements
C. Audit Process and Conclusions
D. Internal Control and Compliance
E. Article XIIIB Limit on Appropriations (Gann Limit)

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 204 ends

Click here to return to the agenda.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT REPORT

WITH REPORT ON AUDIT

BY INDEPENDENT

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021

ATTACHMENT A

Page 3 of 204 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 4 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021

INTRODUCTORY SECTION

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL I

GFOA CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN

FINANCIAL REPORTING VII

ORGANIZATION CHART VIII
PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS AS OF JUNE 30, 2021 IX

FINANCIAL SECTION
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 1
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (REQUIRED
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) 5
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

GOVERNMENTAL-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION 23
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES 24
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS:

BALANCE SHEET 28

RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE

SHEET TO THE GOVERNMENT-WIDE STATEMENT OF NET
POSITION 31

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCES 32

RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT

OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND

BALANCES TO THE GOVERNMENT-WIDE STATEMENT OF
ACTIVITIES 34
PROPRIETARY FUNDS:

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION 36

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET
POSITION 37
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 38
FIDUCIARY FUNDS:

STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION 41
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION 42
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 43

ATTACHMENT A

Page 5 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021

FINANCIAL SECTION (CONTINUED)

REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

CALPERS MISCELLANEOUS PENSION PLAN

SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE NET PENSION
LIABILITY 96
SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS 98

CALPERS SAFETY PENSION PLAN

SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE NET PENSION
LIABILITY 100
SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS 102

OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLAN

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE NET OPEB LIABILITY (ASSET)
AND RELATED RATIOS 104

BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE
GENERAL FUND 105
HOUSING AUTHORITY SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 106
LIGHTING AND MEDIAN MAINTENANCE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 107 NOTE TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 108

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
GENERAL FUND:

DESCRIPTION OF GENERAL FUNDS 111
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET 112

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 113
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS:

DESCRIPTION OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 116
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET 118

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 122

SCHEDULES OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCE – BUDGET AND ACTUAL:

GAS TAX SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 126
PROTECTIVE SERVICES SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 127

ATTACHMENT A

Page 6 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021

FINANCIAL SECTION (CONTINUED)

SCHEDULES OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN
FUND BALANCE – BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED):

CARES ACT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 128

SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND 129

AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SPECIAL REVENUE
FUND 130

FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES TOGETHER (FACT) GRANT
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 131
CALGRIP GRANT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 132
SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 133
MEASURE M SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 134
PUBLIC SAFETY TASK FORCE (PSTF) SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 135 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 136

ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA)
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 137

STANTON CENTRAL PARK MAINTENANCE SPECIAL REVENUE
FUND 138

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND 139

CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM (CASP) SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND 140
AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 141 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 142
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 143 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS:

DESCRIPTION OF INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 144
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION 145

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN NET POSITION 146
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 147
PRIVATE-PURPOSE TRUST FUNDS:

DESCRIPTION OF PRIVATE-PURCHASE TRUST FUNDS 148
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION 149

ATTACHMENT A

Page 7 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET POSITION 150

STATISTICAL SECTION
DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICAL SECTION 151

FINANCIAL TRENDS
NET POSITION BY COMPONENT 152
CHANGES IN NET POSITION 154
FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 158
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 160
REVENUE CAPACITY:

ASSESSED VALUE AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE
PROPERTY 162
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING PROPERTY TAX RATES 164
PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS 166
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS 167
DEBT CAPACITY:

RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE 168
COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING BONDED DEBT 169
LEGAL DEBT MARTIN INFORMATION 170
PLEDGED-REVENUE COVERAGE 172
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC INFORMATION:

DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS 174
PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS 175
OPERATING INFORMATION:

FULL -TIME EQUIVALENT CITY EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTIONS 176
OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTIONS 178
CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION 184

ATTACHMENT A

Page 8 of 204 ends

This page intentionally left blank

ATTACHMENT A

Page 9 of 204 ends

February 22, 2022
To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and Citizens of Stanton:

It is a pleasure to present the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the City of Stanton. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Responsibility for the accuracy of the data, the completeness and reliability of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with City management.

To provide sufficient reliable information for the preparation of the City’s financial statements, City staff has established a comprehensive internal control framework designed to minimize the risk of error or misstatement and the risk of loss, theft, or misuse of City assets. Because the cost of internal controls should not exceed their benefits, the City’s internal controls have been designed to provide reasonable, rather than an absolute, assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement.

The City’s financial statements have been audited by Clifton Larson Allen LLP, certified public accountants. The independent audit firm concluded, based on the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified opinion (“clean opinion”) on the City’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. This means, in the auditors’ opinion, the City’s financial statements fairly present the City’s financial position in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor’s report and provides narrative information, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it.

Profile of Stanton
Stanton is a general law City incorporated in 1956. It occupies a land area of 3.1 square miles and serves a population of approximately 39,573. The City is located in the northwestern portion of Orange County, approximately 23 miles southeast of the City of Los Angeles. It has easy freeway access and is within 12 miles of: Disneyland, Anaheim Stadium, Knotts Berry Farm, Huntington Beach and the John Wayne and Long Beach airports. State Highway 39, Beach Boulevard, runs through the center of the City.
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
P | (714) 379-9222
F | (714) 890-1443

[email protected]
www.ci.stanton.ca.us

ATTACHMENT A

Page 10 of 204 ends

ii
The City is governed under the Council-Manager form of government, with a five-member City Council. The City Council is elected on a non-partisan basis with staggered four-year terms.

Elections are held in November on even-numbered years. The Mayor is elected at-large and the four City Council members are elected by voters in their districts. The Mayor Pro Tem position is selected annually by a majority vote of the City Council members. The City Council appoints the City Manager to carry out the policies and direction of the City Council, oversee the day-to-day operations of the City, and appoint the heads of the various City departments.

The City provides a range of municipal services that includes public works, planning, zoning, building, sewer services, parks and recreation, code enforcement, and parking control. Stanton is a “contract city”, and contracts with other governmental entities, private firms, and individuals to provide some of these services. Police services are provided by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department. Fire services are provided by the Orange County Fire Authority. Water services are provided by Golden State Water Company.

The City is financially accountable for the Stanton Housing Authority (Housing Authority).

Therefore, the Housing Authority’s activities are included in these financial statements.

Additional information on the Housing Authority can be found in Note 1 to the basic financial statements. The former Stanton Redevelopment Agency (Redevelopment Agency) was dissolved on February 1, 2012. Upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, its assets and liabilities were transferred to the Successor Agency to the Stanton Redevelopment Agency (Successor Agency). The City is obligated to report the resources and activities of the Successor Agency in a separate private purpose trust fund, which is also included in these financial statements. All uses of the resources of the Successor Agency must be approved by an independent Oversight Board comprised of members appointed by various taxing entities, and the California Department of Finance (“DOF”). Additional information for the Successor Agency can be found in Note 14 to the basic financial statements.

The City uses an annual budget, which the City Council adopts prior to the beginning of every fiscal year, to manage its finances. The budget is organized by fund (e.g., General Fund), department (e.g., public safety), and division (e.g., law enforcement services). The City Manager can authorize appropriation transfers in the operating and capital budget within the same fund without limitation. Any revisions between funds and revisions that change a fund’s total approved appropriations must be approved by the City Council. The Successor Agency does not adopt a budget because its expenses are restricted to enforceable obligations approved by the DOF. Payments associated with these enforceable obligations are approved annually by the DOF through the submission of a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), unless DOF has approved a Last and Final ROPS. The DOF approved the Successor Agency’s most recent Amended Last and Final ROPS on December 17, 2020. Therefore, the Successor Agency’s annual expenses are limited to the amounts identified on the Amended Last and Final ROPS.

State law mandates that Stanton can only raise local tax rates with voter approval. Use and regulatory fees must also follow procedures set forth in State law and must not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing services. Fees require approval by the City Council; and fees in excess of reasonable cost require voter approval.

Local Economy
Over the last ten years, property values and personal income levels within the City have steadily increased in order to support the level of municipal services and facilities that are needed by

ATTACHMENT A

Page 11 of 204 ends

iii
the community. The assessed valuation of property in the City has grown 59.7% since fiscal year 2011-12 (ten years ago). During the recession, the City experienced a decline in assessed valuation in fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010- 11 and flat growth in fiscal years 2011-12 and 2012-

13. However, the City’s assessed valuation has been consistently increasing since fiscal year 2013-14. In fiscal year 2020-21, the City’s assessed valuation increased 5.9%, and in fiscal year 2021-22, it increased 9.8%.

Stanton is home to approximately 3,000 businesses. Major industries include restaurants, and general retail businesses. Stanton’s unemployment rate has traditionally been below State and national levels. The three largest employers in the City are: Rowntree Gardens, Home Depot and Super King Market. The City’s largest employer with 334 employees, Rowntree Gardens, is a non-profit senior living community that provides a full range of services to its members, such as: memory care, assisted living, independent living, skilled nursing, therapy services, and home care. The Home Depot, the City’s second largest employer with 165 employees, is the world’s largest home improvement retailer with nearly 400,000 associates working in its more than 2,200 stores located through the United States of America and Mexico. Super King Market, the City’s third largest employer with approximately 128 employees, is a full-service supermarket with seven stores located throughout Southern California.

The City’s diverse sales tax base is comprised of a number of companies. The City’s Top 100 sales tax producers include various industries such as: gasoline service stations, restaurants, and general retail businesses. These top sales tax producers generate approximately 86.4% of the City’s total annual sales tax revenue. Additionally, in November 2014, the City’s voters approved a one-cent transaction and use tax (the Stanton 9-1-1 Public Safety and Essential City Services Protective Measure). The City’s Top 100 sales tax producers also generate approximately 66.2% of the City’s total annual transaction and use tax revenue. The City also collects 12% in transient occupancy tax from its local motels. Overall, the City’s fiscal year 2019-20 transient occupancy tax revenue was higher by 9%, as compared to the previous year.

The City’s tax base is well diversified, with total tax revenue representing 75% of the City’s total General Fund revenues. Property tax revenue (which includes property tax received in-lieu of motor vehicle fees) represents 26% of total tax revenues. Sales tax and transaction and use tax revenues represents 35% of total tax revenues. The remainder of the tax base (franchise taxes, transient occupancy taxes, utility user taxes, and business license taxes) contributes another 14% of tax revenues to the General Fund. Total tax revenue increased 10% from fiscal year 2019-20.

Other Relevant Financial Information
The City Council initially established a General Fund reserve policy in 2011 and has updated the policy annually since that time. On June 9, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-27 to approve the General Fund reserve policy for Fiscal Year 2020/21. The risk-based policy sets aside funds the following reserves of the City’s General Fund to ensure the continued financial stability of the City:
 Emergency equipment and maintenance - $250,000;
 Emergency disaster contingency - $2,500,000
 Capital improvement – $5,911,735 (target level is at least 1% of operating expenditures); and

ATTACHMENT A

Page 12 of 204 ends

iv
 Economic uncertainty – $4,300,000 (target level is 16.67% of the General Fund’s operating expenditures.)
With the exception of the economic uncertainty reserve (which is included in unassigned fund balance in accordance with governmental accounting standards), these reserves are reported in the General Fund’s committed fund balance in the accompanying financial statements.

In addition, the City held $4.7 million in an irrevocable trust account held by Public Agency Retirement Services as of June 30, 2021. These funds are restricted for pension and other postemployment benefit expenses only and are included with unrestricted net position in the Employee Benefits Internal Service Fund (to offset pension and other post-employment liabilities reported at year end).

Summary of Current Year Accomplishments
Major projects completed during fiscal year 2020-21 include:
 Approved $2.3 million forgivable loan to Rodeo 39 Marketplace, LLC;  Approved $5 million funding commitment in Housing Authority funds for the State’s Homekey permanent supportive housing program (for Stanton Inn and Suites and Tahiti Motel);
 Applied for and secured $7.7 million in State Proposition 68 grant funds for the Norm Ross Park Improvement Project;
 Completed refinancing of the Successor Agency’s 2010 Tax Allocation Bonds;  Completed migration to Microsoft Office 365;
 Completed implementation of new budget software platform, OpenGov, to automate the budget preparation process.
 Implemented a human resources module and an employee self-service portal to automate processing of personnel action forms and preparation and approval of employee timesheets.
 Completed Proposition 218 process to implement changes to CR&R charges;  Issued over 170 loans to Stanton businesses funded by federal Coronavirus Relief Funds and County of Orange’s General Fund;
 Re-established the City’s Citizens’ Academy; and
 Completed redesign of the City’s website.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 13 of 204 ends

v
Future Work Plan Initiatives
City work plan goals for fiscal year 2021-22 include the following:
 Allocate the City’s $9.1 million in America Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds;  Complete purchase of property located at 10692 and 10712 Beach Boulevard;  Complete $2.5 million funding commitment for the State’s Homekey permanent supportive housing program (for the Riviera Motel);
 Begin design for Norm Ross Sports Park Improvement Project;  Begin work for Orangewood Parquette project;
 Begin design for Dog Park project;
 Replace shade structure at Stanton Central Park;
 Implement an online recruiting solution (NeoGov);
 Implement public fraud hotline;
 Continue to enforce City’s anti-camping regulations;
 Complete approvals of cannabis permit applications
 Replace flooring in Police Services building;
 Begin work on the update of the Sewer Master Plan;
 Complete 2021 Housing and Safety Element Update;
 Complete 2020 Town Center Specific Plan;
 Complete cost allocation plan and City-wide user fee study;  Complete competitive bid process for City-wide tree trimming services;  Complete competitive bid process for parking enforcement services;  Complete transition of public works inspection services from contracted to in-house;  Complete analysis of City’s contracted building inspection and building plan check services; and
 Continue work on sale of Tina Pacific Neighborhood.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 14 of 204 ends

(vi)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the members of the City Council for their leadership and the City's Senior Staff for their commitment to maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in managing the City's operations and finances. Also, the preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the entire staff of the City's Finance Department, as well as the City's independent auditors, Clifton Larson Allen LLP.

Respectfully submitted,

ATTACHMENT A

Page 15 of 204 ends

(vii)

ATTACHMENT A

Page 16 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
JUNE 30, 2021
(viii)
Stanton Residents

CITY MANAGER
Jarad Hildenbrand
Administration
Information Technology
Personnel and Risk Management
Public Information
City Clerk
Patricia A. Vazquez
Administration
Council Support
Elections
Records Management
Finance
Michelle Bannigan
Administration
Accounting / Payroll
Budget & Financial Planning
Business License
Debt Service
Treasury
Public Safety
James J. Wren
Administration
Ambulance Services
Animal Control
Code Enforcement
Emergency Preparedness
Homeless Outreach
North Orange County Public
Safety Task Force
Parking Control
Public Works
Steven Strapac
(NV5, Inc.)
Administration
CIP Administration
Crossing Guards
Engineering
Fleet Maintenance
Graffiti Abatement
Parks Maintenance
Public Facilities Maintenance
Sewer Maintenance
Storm Drain Maintenance
Street Lighting
Street Maintenance
Community & Economic
Development
Jennifer Lilley
Administration
Building Regulation
CDBG/Housing
Economic Development
Planning
Community
Services
Zenia Bobadilla
Administration
Facility Rentals
FaCT Program
Recreation Programs
Senior Services
Special Events
Stanton Family Resource
Center
Fire Services (OCFA)
Mike Petro
Administration
Fire Protection
Police Services (OCSD)
Captain. Cruz Alday
Administration
Crime Prevention
Investigations
Parking Enforcement
Patrol
Supervision
Traffic
City Attorney
HongDao Nguyen
Best Best & Krieger LLP

CITY COUNCIL
David J. Shawver, Mayor
Gary Taylor, Mayor Pro-Tem
Rigoberto A. Ramirez, Council Member
Hong Alyce Van, Council Member
Carol Warren, Council Member

ATTACHMENT A

Page 17 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA

LIST OF PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS
JUNE 30, 2021
(ix)
City Manager .............................................................................................................. Jarad Hildenbrand City Clerk .................................................................................................................. Patricia A. Vazquez Community & Economic Development Director ................................................................. Jennifer Lilley Community Services Director ......................................................................................... Zenia Bobadilla Finance Director/City Treasurer .................................................................................. Michelle Bannigan Public Safety Services Director ........................................................................................ James J. Wren Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer (NV5, Inc.) ................................................. Steven Strapac City Attorney (Best, Best & Krieger LLP) .................................................................... HongDao Nguyen Chief of Police Services (O.C. Sheriff Department) .................................................. Captain Cruz Alday Orange County Fire Authority Division Chief .......................................................................... Mike Petro

ATTACHMENT A

Page 18 of 204 ends

CLA is an independent member of Nexia International, a leading, global network of independent accounting and consulting firms. See nexia.com/member‐firm‐disclaimer for details. (1)
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
CLAconnect.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
of the City of Stanton, California
Stanton, California
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activity, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Stanton, California (the City) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2021, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditors consider internal control relevant to the City’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 19 of 204 ends

The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
of the City of Stanton, California
(2)
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Opinions
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activity, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2021, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Emphasis of Matters
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, the City adopted GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities. As a result of the implementation of this standard, previously reported agency funds were reclassified to the City’s General Fund and beginning fund balance and net position was restated (see Notes 1E and 16). Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

As discussed in Note 16 to the financial statements, the City made restatements to beginning net position. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis, the schedules of proportionate share of the net pension liability and the schedules of contributions for the CalPERS miscellaneous and safety pension plans, the schedule of changes in the net other postemployment benefit (OPEB) liability (asset) and related ratios, and the budgetary comparison schedules for the General Fund and Major Special Revenue Funds, identified as Required Supplementary Information (RSI) in the accompanying table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules, and statistical section, as listed in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 20 of 204 ends

The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
of the City of Stanton, California
(3)
The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules (supplementary information), as listed in the table of contents, are the responsibility of management and were derived from, and relate directly to, the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements.

Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the supplementary information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 17, 2022, on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Irvine, California
February 17, 2022

ATTACHMENT A

Page 21 of 204 ends

(4)
This page intentionally left blank

ATTACHMENT A

Page 22 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(5)
As management of the City of Stanton (City), we offer readers of the City’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Please read it in conjunction with the accompanying transmittal letter at the front of this report, and the basic financial statements, which follow this section.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
 The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at June 30, 2021, by $148.9 million. This amount is referred to as the net position of the City. Of this amount, $30.3 million is unrestricted net position and may be used to meet the City’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.  During fiscal year 2020-21, the City’s overall net position decreased by $0.9 million primarily as the result of a prior period adjustment of $2.2 million to restate accumulated depreciation associated with buildings acquired with property acquisitions for the Tina-Pacific housing project area.  The City’s total long-term liabilities, which includes net pension liability, decreased by $297,310, or

3.9% during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, to a total outstanding amount of $7.3 million.

During fiscal year 2020-21, the City paid off the outstanding balance of the capital lease with Bank of the West for $1.1 million.
 As of June 30, 2021, the City’s governmental funds (the General Fund, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Projects funds) reported combined ending fund balances of $45.7 million.

Governmental fund expenditures and other financing uses exceeded revenues and other financing sources by $2.1 million during fiscal year 2020-21. Of the $43.5 million combined ending fund balances at June 30, 2021, $12.7 million is categorized as unassigned, $0.6 million is categorized as assigned, $8.7 million is categorized as committed, $21.2 million is categorized as restricted, and $2.5 million is categorized as non-spendable. More detailed information regarding these amounts can be found in Note 13 in the Notes to Basic Financial Statements.  The combined $13.0 million of assigned and unassigned fund balance of the General Fund represented 47.0% of total General Fund revenues including transfers in.

OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The discussion and analysis are intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial statements. The City’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the basic financial statements. This report also consists of supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements.

Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. There are two government-wide financial statements: the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities. They present information for the government as a whole and present a longerterm view of the City’s finances. These two statements help to answer the question: “Is the City as a whole bette7r off or worse off as a result of this year’s activities?”

ATTACHMENT A

Page 23 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(6)
The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the City’s assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources with the difference reported as net position.

Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating.

The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the government’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying events giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in the future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave).

Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, community development, public works and culture and recreation. The business-type activities of the City include sewer activities.

Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements include not only the City itself (known as the primary government), but also the Stanton Housing Authority (“Housing Authority”), a legally separate entity. The Housing Authority functions for all practical purposes as an integral part of the City, and therefore, is included in the accompanying financial statements as a part of the primary government as a blended component unit.

Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with financerelated legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories:
governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds.

Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances on spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financing requirements.

Because the focus of governmental fund is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government’s near-term financing decisions.

Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities.

The City maintains various individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures,

ATTACHMENT A

Page 24 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(7)
and changes in fund balances for the: General Fund, Housing Authority Special Revenue Fund, and Lighting and Median Maintenance Special Revenue Fund, all of which are considered major funds.

Data from other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregate presentation. Individual fund data for each of these other governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report.

The City adopts an annual budget for certain governmental and proprietary funds. Annual appropriations are approved prior to the beginning of the year. A budgetary comparison schedule has been provided for each of the governmental funds for which a budget was adopted to demonstrate compliance with this budget. The definition of the General Fund for purposes of these audited financial statements is different than for budgetary purposes. For budgeting purposes, the Transaction and Use Tax Fund and the Expendable Deposits Fund are separated from the General Fund. However, these funds have been combined into the General Fund for these financial statements. Individual fund data for these funds is provided in the form of combining statements in the supplementary information section of this report.

Proprietary funds. The City maintains two different types of proprietary funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its sewer operations. Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the City’s various functions. The City uses internal service funds to account for its workers’ compensation insurance activities, liability/risk management activities, employee benefits activities, and fleet maintenance activities.

Proprietary funds provide the same type of informational date as the government-wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the sewer operations, which is considered to be a major fund of the City. Conversely, all internal service funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the proprietary fund financial statements. Individual fund data for the internal service funds is provided in the form of combining statements in the supplementary information section of this report.

Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary Funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide financial statement because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City’s own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. The City utilizes two private-purpose trust funds to account for the assets, liabilities, and activities of the Successor Agency to the dissolved Stanton Redevelopment Agency and the North Orange County Public Safety Task Force.

Notes to Basic Financial Statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements.

Other information. In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents certain required supplementary information concerning the City’s budgetary policies and supplementary information on the City’s defined benefit plans.

The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with General Funds, other governmental funds and internal service funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information as supplementary information. The City’s supplementary information section also presents

ATTACHMENT A

Page 25 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(8)
budgetary schedules for individual governmental funds and combining statements for the fiduciary funds.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE GOVERNMENT-WIDE STATEMENTS
As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government’s financial position. In the case of the City, assets and deferred outflows exceeded liabilities by $148.9 million as of June 30, 2021. In comparison, net position was $149.8 million as of June 30, 2020.

The largest portion of the City’s net position at June 30, 2021, ($97.1 million or 65.2% of total net position), reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g., land, infrastructure, buildings, improvements, and equipment). The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City’s investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.

An additional $21.4 million of the City’s net position is restricted net position, representing resources that are subject to external restrictions or enabling legislation on how they may be used. The breakdown of restricted net positions by functions is as follows: 1) low- and moderate-income housing projects ($14.1 million); 2) public safety for restricted grants and fees ($0.6 million); 3) community development for restricted grants and fees ($0.3 million); 4) public works for restricted grants and fees ($2.7 million); and 5) culture and recreation for restricted grants and fees ($3.7 million).

The remaining $30.4 million is unrestricted net position, which may be used to meet the government’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. Unrestricted net position increased $4.6 million, or 17.7%, from June 30, 2020.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 26 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(9)
A summary of the government-wide Statement of Net Position follows:
2021 2020 2021 2020 2021 2020 % Change
Current and other assets $ 54,611,859 $ 51,314,552 $ 5,348,470 $ 59,960,329 4,611,934 $ $ 55,926,486 7.2% Capital assets, net 92,106,906 97,443,574 4,970,607 4,964,679 97,077,513 102,408,253 -5.2% Total assets 146,718,765 148,758,126 10,319,077 9,576,613 157,037,842 158,334,739 -0.8% Deferred outflows of resources 1,846,023 1,887,674 4,503 40,263 1,850,526 1,927,937 -4.0% Long-term liabilities 7,252,446 7,393,455 25,622 181,923 7,278,068 7,575,378 -3.9% Other liabilities 1,864,105 2,189,596 133,376 57,318 1,997,481 2,246,914 -11.1% Total liabilities 9,116,551 9,583,051 158,998 239,241 9,275,549 9,822,292 -5.6% Deferred inflows of resources 750,212 591,717 618 13,995 750,830 605,712 24.0% Net position:
92,106,906 96,374,328 4,970,607 4,964,679 97,077,513 101,339,007 -4.2% Restricted 21,411,322 22,693,282 - 21,411,322 - 22,693,282 -5.6% Unrestricted 25,179,797 21,403,422 5,193,357 4,398,961 30,373,154 25,802,383 17.7% Total net position 138,698,025 $ 140,471,032 $ 10,163,964 $ 9,363,640 $ 148,861,989 $ 149,834,672 $ -0.6% Net investment in capital assets
Governmental
Activities
Business-type
Activities Totals
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City’s overall net position increased by $1.3 million. A prior period adjustment is reflected in the accompanying financial statements to restate buildings, net of accumulated depreciation, located in the Tina Pacific housing project area. This prior period adjustment resulted in a $2.2 million reduction in net position. Refer to Note 16 in the Notes to Basic Financial Statements for additional information.

The fiscal year 2020-21 governmental activities resulted in an increase in net position of $0.5 million.

The fiscal year 2020-21 business type activities resulted in an increase in net position of $0.8 million.

Additional information has been provided below for a more detailed discussion of the City’s governmental activities and business-type activities.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 27 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(10)
A summary of the government-wide Statement of Activities follows:
2021 2020 2021 2020 2021 2020 % Change
Revenues:

Program Revenues:

Charges for services $ 8,915,668 $ 7,656,824 $ 2,235,352 $ 11,151,020 1,305,410 $ $ 8,962,234 24.4% Operating grants and
contributions 5,697,844 4,655,790 - 5,697,844 - 4,655,790 22.4% Capital grants and 35,081 3,423,482 - - 35,081 3,423,482 -99.0% General revenues:

Taxes:

Property taxes 7,561,831 6,816,387 165,692 147,159 7,727,523 6,963,546 11.0% Sales taxes 4,682,029 4,278,141 - 4,682,029 - 4,278,141 9.4% Transaction and use
taxes 4,991,100 4,537,734 - 4,991,100 - 4,537,734 10.0% Transient occupancy
taxes 569,293 512,492 - - 569,293 512,492 11.1%
Franchise taxes 1,105,276 1,055,791 - 1,105,276 - 1,055,791 4.7% Utility user taxes 1,990,690 1,791,516 - 1,990,690 - 1,791,516 11.1% Other taxes 345,315 364,751 - - 345,315 364,751 -5.3%
Investment earnings,
unrestricted 959,781 1,167,877 12,343 167,573 972,124 1,335,450 -27.2% Miscellaneous 95,045 272,563 - 7,900 95,045 -66.1% 280,463 Total revenues 36,948,953 36,533,348 2,413,387 1,628,042 39,362,340 38,161,390 3.1% Expenses:

General government 4,848,332 3,739,756 - 4,848,332 - 3,739,756 29.6% Public safety 21,046,456 18,712,309 - 21,046,456 - 18,712,309 12.5% Community development 3,696,528 3,000,334 - 3,696,528 - 3,000,334 23.2% Public works 4,652,371 2,404,139 - 4,652,371 - 2,404,139 93.5% Culture and recreation 2,301,778 2,120,218 - 2,301,778 - 2,120,218 8.6% Interest on long-term debt 25,823 24,223 - - 25,823 24,223 6.6% Sewer enterprise - 1,531,447 - 1,436,274 1,531,447 1,436,274 6.6% Total expenses 36,571,288 30,000,979 1,531,447 1,436,274 38,102,735 31,437,253 21.2% Increase (decrease) in net
position before transfers 377,665 6,532,369 881,940 191,768 1,259,605 6,724,137 -81.3% Transfers 81,616 - (81,616) - - - 0.0%
Change in Net Position 459,281 6,532,369 800,324 191,768 1,259,605 6,724,137 -81.3% Net position, beginning of
year, as restated 138,238,744 133,938,663 9,363,640 9,171,872 147,602,384 143,110,535 3.1% Net position, end of year 138,698,025 $ 140,471,032 $ 10,163,964 $ 9,363,640 $ 148,861,989 $ 149,834,672 $ -0.6% Activities
Governmental Business-type
Activities Totals

ATTACHMENT A

Page 28 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(11)
Governmental activities
During the current fiscal year, the City’s net position for governmental activities increased by $0.5 million from the prior fiscal year. The following table summarizes and presents governmental activities revenue by source and percentages for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, along with the percentage changes from the prior year:

Increase
(Decrease) Percent
Fiscal Year Percent From Increase
FUNCTION 2020-21 of Total 2019-20 (Decrease)
Charges for services $ 8,915,668 24.1% 1,258,844 $ 16.4% Operating grants and contributions 5,697,844 15.4% 1,042,054 22.4% Capital grants and contributions 35,081 0.1% (3,388,401) -99.0% Sales, transaction, and use taxes 9,673,129 26.2% 857,254 9.7% Property taxes 7,561,831 20.5% 745,444 10.9%
Other taxes 4,010,574 10.9% 286,024 7.7%
Other 1,054,826 2.8% (385,614) -26.8%
TOTAL REVENUES $ 36,948,953 100.0% 415,605 $ 1.1%

ATTACHMENT A

Page 29 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(12)
Revenues increased $0.4 million, or 1.1%, from the prior year. Capital contributions and grants decreased by $3.4 million, or 99.0%, in fiscal year 2020-21 due to one-time revenue that was collected during the previous fiscal year. In fiscal year 2019-20, the California Department of Finance’s approval of the Successor Agency’s Last and Final Recognized Payment Obligation Schedule (ROPS) which permitted the Successor Agency to transfer $3.4 million in housing bond proceeds to the City. Charges for services increased by $1.3 million, or 16.4%, in fiscal year 2020-21 primarily due to public benefit fees collected for the Brookfield and KB Homes residential development projects and additional permit revenue collected due to the overall increase in development activity. The City issued 812 permits with a valuation of $82.8 million during fiscal year 2020-21, compared to 649 permits with a valuation of $39.4 million that were issued during the previous fiscal year. Operating grants and contributions increased by $1.1 million, or 22.4%, in fiscal year 2020-21 due to grant funding the City received from the State of California and County of Orange under the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020. A corresponding increase in expenses is reflected in the general government and public safety functions. Sales and transaction and use taxes increased $0.8 million, or

9.7%, due to increased retail sales in quick service restaurants and increased online sales activity.

Property taxes increased $0.7 million, or 10.9%, due to increases in the City’s assessed valuation.

Other taxes increased $0.3 million, or 7.7%, primarily due to increased utility user tax revenue collected during the current fiscal year. Utility user taxes increased by $0.2 million during fiscal year 2020-21, primarily due to increased revenue from electricity and water customers. Other revenue sources decreased by $0.4 million, or 26.8%, primarily due to reduced investment earnings realized during fiscal year 2020-21. The average yield on the City’s investment portfolio was 1.1% during fiscal year 2020-21 compared to an average yield of 2.2% in fiscal year 2019-20.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 30 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(13)
The cost of all governmental activities during fiscal year 2020-21 was $36.6 million, an increase of $6.6 million, or 21.9%, from the previous fiscal year. The following table summarizes and presents governmental activities expenses by function and percentages for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, along with the percentage changes from the prior year.

Increase
(Decrease) Percent
Fiscal Year Percent From Increase
FUNCTION 2020-21 of Total 2019-20 (Decrease)
General government $ 4,848,332 13.3% 1,108,576 $ 29.6%
Public safety 21,046,456 57.5% 2,334,147 12.5%
Community development 3,696,528 10.1% 696,194 23.2%
Public works 4,652,371 12.7% 2,248,232 93.5%
Culture and recreation 2,301,778 6.3% 181,560 8.6%
Interest on long-term debt 25,823 0.1% 1,600 6.6%
TOTAL EXPENSES 36, $ 571,288 100.0% 6,570,309 $ 21.9%
General government expenses increased by $1.1 million, or 29.6%. During fiscal year 2020-21, the City provided over 170 small business loans, totaling $1.1 million, to Stanton businesses that were negatively impacted by Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The small business loans were funded by CARES Act grant funds and the County of Orange’s General Fund. Public safety expenses increased by $2.3 million, or 12.5%, from last year. The City created a new division in its budget to address homeless prevention activities. During fiscal year 2020-21, the City added two new staff positions, Outreach Coordinators, to interact with the homeless community and connect them with services to address their housing and other needs. On September 20, 2020, the City approved a $5 million funding commitment for permanent supportive housing projects located in Stanton (part of the State’s Project Homekey Program). During fiscal year 2020-21, the City paid $2.6 million of this funding commitment.

Community development expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 23.2%, primarily due to increased contracted inspection and building plan check services (which are offset by additional charges for services revenue received) and professional services for the preparation of the Town Center Specific

ATTACHMENT A

Page 31 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(14)
Plan and 2021 Housing and Safety Element Plan. Public works expenses increased by $2.2 million, or

93.5%, primarily due to the disposition of capital assets that resulted in a total loss of $1.4 million. The City sold two parcels to Habitat for Humanity for $210,100, resulting in a loss of $1.0 million. In addition, the City demolished the buildings located at 8881 Pacific Avenue and 8931 Pacific Avenue, which resulted in an additional loss on disposal of the $.4 million (the net book value of the assets).

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY’S FUNDS
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure compliance with finance-related legal requirements.

Governmental funds:

The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spending resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for discretionary spending as this category of fund balance represents the portion of fund balance which has not yet been limited to use for a particular purpose by either an external party, the City itself, or a group or individual that has been delegated authority to assign resources for use for particular purposes by the City Council.

At June 30, 2021, the City’s governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $45.7 million.

Approximately, $12.7 million consists of unassigned fund balance, which is available for spending at the City’s discretion. The remainder of the fund balance is either nonspendable, restricted, committed or assigned to indicate that it is: 1) not in spendable form ($2.5 million), 2) legally required to be spent on specific uses or maintained intact through a federal, state, or local law or contractual obligation ($21.2 million), 3) committed for a specific purpose by City Council resolution ($8.7 million), or 4) assigned for a particular purpose ($0.6 million). Refer to Note 13 in the Notes to Basic Financial Statements for more detailed information regarding nonspendable, restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned fund balances.

General Fund. The General Fund is the City’s chief operating fund. As of June 30, 2021, the total fund balance of the General Fund was $24.2 million, an increase of $3.6 million, or 17.3%. 2021 2020 $ Change % Change
Nonspendable $ 2,488,780 $ 146,069 $ 2,342,711 1603.8%
Committed 8,661,735 10,074,410 (1,412,675) -100.0%
Assigned 356,687 232,752 123,935.000 100.0%
Unassigned - contingency rese 10,277,670 12,691,577 2,413,907 23.5% Total 24,198,779 $ 20,622,084 $ 3,576,695 $ 17.3%

ATTACHMENT A

Page 32 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(15)
The City’s nonspendable fund balance includes prepaid items, advances to other funds, and the current portion of outstanding notes and loans receivable. On March 23, 2021, the City Council authorized a loan from the General Fund to the Lighting and Median Maintenance Special Revenue Fund in a principal amount not to exceed $959,440, to pay off the City’s capital lease agreement with Bank of the West. Additional information regarding the interfund advance can be found in Note 5 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. Also, in April 2021, the City provided Rodeo 39 Public Marketplace, LLC with a forgivable loan of $2.3 million. Refer to Note 3 in the Notes to Basic Financial Statements for additional information.

The City’s committed fund balance includes reserves for: emergency equipment and maintenance ($250,000); emergency disaster contingency ($2.5 million); and capital improvement ($5.9 million).

The City’s discretionary fund balance (assigned and unassigned amounts) includes a $4.3 million reserve for economic uncertainty. The City’s discretionary fund balance at June 30, 2021, was $13.1 million, or 53.9% of total General Fund balance.

Additional information on the City’s General Fund balance can be found in Note 13 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.

Housing Authority Special Revenue Fund. As of June 30, 2021, the Housing Authority Special Revenue Fund reported a restricted fund balance of $14.1 million, which represents a decrease of $2.7 million, or 16.0%, from the prior fiscal year. The reduction is due to the City’s funding contribution to permanent supportive housing projects previously discussed.

Lighting and Median Maintenance Special Revenue Fund. As of June 30, 2021, the Lighting and Median Maintenance Special Revenue Fund reported a restricted fund balance of $473,333, which represents a decrease of $0.8 million, or 64.2%, from the prior fiscal year, primarily due to the payoff of the capital lease agreement with Bank of the West. The total principal retirement during fiscal year 2020-21 was $1.1 million.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 33 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(16)
Proprietary Funds:

The proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in greater detail. The City operates one business-type activity for sewer operations.

Sewer Enterprise Fund. The Sewer Enterprise Fund’s unrestricted net position at the end of fiscal year 2020-21 was $5.2 million June 30, 2021, an increase of $0.8 million, or 18.06%, from the previous year. The Sewer Enterprise Fund’s total revenues increased by $0.7 million, or 48.2% from the prior fiscal year due to additional sewer connection fees collected on behalf of the Orange County Sanitation District (OC San) as a result of increased development activity within the City. All of these revenues were passed through to OC San. Total expenses in the Sewer Enterprise Fund increased by $95,173, or 6.6%. However, after excluding the fees that were passed through to OC San, total expenses decreased by $0.8 million, or 74.7%, due because the City spent less funds on sewer improvements during the current fiscal year compared with the prior year pending the completion of an updated Sewer Master Plan in Fiscal Year 2021-22.

Internal Service Funds. As of June 30, 2021, the Internal Service Funds reported total unrestricted net position of $59,835, a decrease of $84,942 or 58.7%, from the previous year. The City was a member of the Public Entity Risk Management Authority (PERMA) risk sharing pool from February 1, 1987, to June 30, 2020. PERMA conducted a study of the losses incurred by its liability program over the last several years. The result of the study was an additional assessment to the City of $122,758 that needs to be paid to PERMA within the next five years.

GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS
In preparing the budget, the City attempts to estimate its revenues using realistic, but conservative, methods so as to budget its expenditure appropriations and activities in a prudent manner. As a result, the City Council adopts budget adjustments during the course of the fiscal year to reflect both changed priorities and availability of revenues to allow for the expansion of existing programs, if required.

For the year ended June 30, 2021, the General Fund reported a net increase in fund balance of $3.6 million. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the City’s General Fund revenues was uncertain during fiscal year 2020-21. Actual revenues exceeded final budgeted amounts by $2.0 million, or 7.8% primarily due to the City collecting more revenue than expected, especially in taxes and assessments and licenses, fees, and permits. Taxes and assessments exceeded the final budget by $1.0 million, or

5.0%, primarily due to increased sales taxes. transaction and use taxes, transient occupancy taxes exceeding the final budget. Sales taxes and transaction and use taxes increased by 9% from the prior year actual revenues, which is more than the 6.0% increase anticipated in the final budget. Transient occupancy taxes were expected to decline by 15% during fiscal year 2020-21 because the City expected occupancy rates to decline and to account for the Stanton Inn & Suites being utilized by the County of Orange for their Project RoomKey for temporary housing. However, actual transient occupancy tax revenue was 9.0% greater than fiscal year 2019-20 and exceeded the fiscal year 2020- 21 final budget amount. Licenses, fees, and permits exceeded the budget by $0.9 million, or 69.6%, primarily due to more building permits issued during the current fiscal year than were issued during the previous year. Expenditures were less than final budgeted amounts by $1.4 million, or 5.6%. The budget savings can be attributed to the following: 1) $0.3 million was carried over to the fiscal year 2021-22 budget for projects that were started, but not completed during fiscal year 2020-21; 2) $0.5 million was from savings in the law enforcement contract with the County of Orange due to vacancy

ATTACHMENT A

Page 34 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(17)
credits; and 3) $0.6 million consists of savings resulting from actual costs for professional services being less than the amount budgeted.

CAPITAL ASSET AND LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Capital Assets
2021 2020 2021 2020 2021 2020 % Change
Land $ 38,732,365 $ 48,979,556 $ - -$ $ 38,732,365 $ 48,979,556 -20.9% Construction in progress - 12,500 - - - 12,500 -100.0%
Buildings and improvements 35,716,932 30,435,527 - - 35,716,932 30,435,527 17.4% Equipment 79,483 67,671 - - 79,483 67,671 17.5%
Vehicles 278,868 250,988 - - 278,868 250,988 11.1%
Sanitary plant - - 4,512,218 4,493,194 4,512,218 4,493,194 0.4% General plant - - 458,389 471,485 458,389 471,485 -2.8% Infrastructure 17,299,258 17,697,332 - - 17,299,258 17,697,332 -2.2% Totals $ 92,106,906 $ 97,443,574 $ 4,970,607 $ 4,964,679 $ 97,077,513 $ 102,408,253 -5.2% Business-type
Activities
Governmental
Activities Totals
Total capital assets, as well as governmental activities capital assets, decreased by $5.3 million, or

5.2% from the prior fiscal year. Land decreased by $10.2 million, or 20.9%. During fiscal year 2020-21, the City sold the properties located at 7922 Cerritos and 10522 Flower Avenue to Habitat for Humanity.

In addition, $9.1 million of property located in the Tina-Pacific housing project area building and improvements. Buildings and improvements increased by $5.3 million, or 17.4%, due to the reclassification of the Tina-Pacific properties. Capital assets for business-type activities increased by $5,928, or 0.1%, from the prior year. Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note 4 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.

Long-Term Liabilities
As of June 30, 2021, the City had total long-term liabilities outstanding of $7.3 million. Total long-term liabilities decreased by $0.3 million, or 3.9% during fiscal year 2020-21. The City’s net pension liability increased by $0.6 million, or 10.0%. During fiscal year 2020-21, the City paid off its $1.1 million capital lease agreement with Bank of the West. Additional information on the City’s long-term liabilities can be found in Note 7 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 35 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2021
(18)
2021 2020 2021 2020 2021 2020
%
Change
Net pension liability $ 5,870,689 6,631,148 $ $ 22,918 $ 178,909 $ 6,654,066 $ 6,049,598 10.0% Other post-employment benefits 125,301 135,831 - 135,831 - 125,301 8.4% Capital lease 1,069,246 - - - - 1,069,246 -100.0%
Compensated absences 282,253 261,668 2,704 3,014 284,957 264,682 7.7% Claims payable 203,214 66,551 - 203,214 - 205.4% 66,551 Totals $ 7,393,455 7,252,446 $ 25,622$ 181,923$ $ 7,278,068 $ 7,575,378 -3.9% Governmental
Activities
Business-type
Activities Totals
ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET
Local governments throughout the State of California are challenged with funding increasing costs of operations with constrained resources. The City maintains a conservative approach to budgeting revenues and expenditures. Management takes an active role in monitoring the application of the budget during the fiscal year to apply any necessary changes to projected revenues as well as appropriated expenditures. The budget for fiscal year 2021-22 was projected with revenue growth of

3.2% and expenditure growth of 4.0%. The General Fund budget was balanced with revenues exceeding appropriations by $18,765.

REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City’s finances for all those with an interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional information should be addressed to: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 36 of 204 ends

(19)

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATTACHMENT A

Page 37 of 204 ends

(20)
This page intentionally left blank

ATTACHMENT A

Page 38 of 204 ends

(21)

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATTACHMENT A

Page 39 of 204 ends

(22)
This page intentionally left blank

ATTACHMENT A

Page 40 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statements.
(23)
Primary Government
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activity Total

ASSETS AND DEFERRED OUTFLOWS

OF RESOURCES
Cash and Investments $ 42,737,195 $ 5,326,718 $ 48,063,913 Restricted Cash and Investments Held in
Pension Trust 4,696,361 - 4,696,361
Receivables 2,546,264 21,752 2,568,016
Due From Other Governments 1,392,709 - 1,392,709
Prepaid Items 119,706 - 119,706
Notes and Loans Receivable 3,119,624 - 3,119,624
Capital Assets:

Not Being Depreciated 38,732,365 - 38,732,365
Being Depreciated (net of Accumulated
Depreciation) 53,374,541 4,970,607 58,345,148
Total Assets 146,718,765 10,319,077 157,037,842
Deferred Amount From OPEB 412,512 - 412,512
Deferred Amount From Pension Plans 1,433,511 4,503 1,438,014 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 1,846,023 4,503 1,850,526

LIABILITIES AND DEFERRED INFLOWS

OF RESOURCES
Accounts Payable 1,417,599 133,376 1,550,975
Accrued Liabilities 425,733 - 425,733
Deposits 14,550 - 14,550
Unearned Revenue 6,223 - 6,223
Long-Term Liabilities:

Due Within One Year 198,615 975 199,590
Due in More Than One Year:

Other Long-Term Liabilities 286,852 1,729 288,581
Net Pension Liability 6,631,148 22,918 6,654,066
Net Other Postemployment
Benefits (OPEB) Liability 135,831 - 135,831
Total Liabilities 9,116,551 158,998 9,275,549
Deferred Amount From OPEB 9,693 - 9,693
Deferred Amount From Pension Plans 740,519 618 741,137
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 750,212 618 750,830

NET POSITION
Investment in Capital Assets 92,106,906 4,970,607 97,077,513 Restricted for:

Low- and Moderate-Income Housing 14,075,781 - 14,075,781 Public Safety 658,132 - 658,132
Community Development 257,747 - 257,747
Public Works 2,707,759 - 2,707,759
Culture and Recreation 3,711,903 - 3,711,903
Unrestricted 25,179,797 5,193,357 30,373,154
Total Net Position $ 138,698,025 $ 10,163,964 $ 148,861,989

ATTACHMENT A

Page 41 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statements.
(24)
Charges Operating Capital
for Grants and Grants and
Expenses Services Contributions Contributions
Governmental Activities
General Government $ 4,848,332 $ 85,717 $ 392,345 $ -
Public Safety 21,046,456 2,088,690 2,305,328 -
Community Development 3,696,528 5,107,540 220,732 -
Public Works 4,652,371 68,258 2,291,527 35,081
Culture and Recreation 2,301,778 1,565,463 487,912 -
Interest on Long-Term Debt 25,823 - - -
Total Governmental
Activities 36,571,288 8,915,668 5,697,844 35,081
Business-Type Activity
Sewer Enterprise 1,531,447 2,235,352 - -
Total $ 38,102,735 $ 11,151,020 $ 5,697,844 $ 35,081

GENERAL REVENUES
Taxes:

Property Taxes
Sales Taxes
Transactions and Use Taxes
Transient Occupancy Taxes
Franchise Taxes
Utility User Taxes
Other Taxes
Investment Earnings
Miscellaneous
Transfers
Total General Revenues

CHANGE IN NET POSITION
Net position - Beginning of Year,
as Restated

NET POSITION - END OF YEAR
Program Revenues
Functions/Programs

ATTACHMENT A

Page 42 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES (CONTINUED)
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statements.
(25)
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activity Total
$ - (4,370,270) $ $ (4,370,270)
(16,652,438) - (16,652,438)
1,631,744 - 1,631,744
(2,257,505) - (2,257,505)
(248,403) - (248,403)
(25,823) - (25,823)
(21,922,695) - (21,922,695)
703,905 - 703,905
(21,922,695) 703,905 (21,218,790)
7,561,831 165,692 7,727,523
4,682,029 - 4,682,029
4,991,100 - 4,991,100
569,293 - 569,293
1,105,276 - 1,105,276
1,990,690 - 1,990,690
345,315 - 345,315
959,781 12,343 972,124
95,045 - 95,045
81,616 (81,616) -
22,381,976 96,419 22,478,395
459,281 800,324 1,259,605
138,238,744 9,363,640 147,602,384
$ 138,698,025 $ 10,163,964 $ 148,861,989
Net (Expense) Revenue and
Changes in Net Position

ATTACHMENT A

Page 43 of 204 ends

(26)
This page intentionally left blank

ATTACHMENT A

Page 44 of 204 ends

(27)

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

ATTACHMENT A

Page 45 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

BALANCE SHEET

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statements.
(28)
Lighting
Housing and Median
General Authority Maintenance
ASSETS
Cash and Investments 19,756,806 $ 13,168,921 $ 1,482,628 $ Receivables:

Accounts 257,590 132,485 -
Interest 29,200 10,751 1,063
Taxes 2,076,935 - 7,829
Prepaid Items 41,742 - -
Due from Other Funds 547,192 - -
Due from Other Governments 387,307 - -
Notes and Loans Receivable 2,051,624 1,068,000 -
Advances to Other Funds 963,065 - -
Total Assets $ 26,111,461 $ 14,380,157 $ 1,491,520

LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF

RESOURCES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:

Accounts Payable $ 1,106,021 $ 27,201 $ 55,122
Accrued Liabilities 425,733 - -
Deposits - 14,550 -
Unearned Revenue 5,662 - -
Advances from Other Funds - - 963,065
Due to Other Funds - 262,625 -
Total Liabilities 1,537,416 304,376 1,018,187
Deferred Inflows of Resources:

Unavailable Revenues 375,266 - -
Total Liabilities and
Deferred Inflows of Resources 1,912,682 304,376 1,018,187 Fund Balances:

Nonspendable 2,488,780 - -
Restricted - 14,075,781 473,333
Committed 8,661,735 - -
Assigned 356,687 - -
Unassigned 12,691,577 - -
Total Fund Balances 24,198,779 14,075,781 473,333
Total Liabilities and Fund Balances $ 26,111,461 $ 14,380,157 $ 1,491,520 Special Revenue Funds

ATTACHMENT A

Page 46 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

BALANCE SHEET (CONTINUED)

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statements.
(29)
Other Total
Governmental Governmental
Funds Funds
$ 6,811,052 $ 41,219,407
15,028 405,103
4,542 45,556
4,576 2,089,340
75,714 117,456
- 547,192
707,476 1,094,783
- 3,119,624
- 963,065
$ 7,618,388 $ 49,601,526
$ 192,684 $ 1,381,028
- 425,733
- 14,550
- 5,662
- 963,065
284,567 547,192
477,251 3,337,230
198,785 574,051
676,036 3,911,281
- 2,488,780
6,663,423 21,212,537
- 8,661,735
278,929 635,616
- 12,691,577
6,942,352 45,690,245
$ 7,618,388 $ 49,601,526

ATTACHMENT A

Page 47 of 204 ends

(30)
This page intentionally left blank

ATTACHMENT A

Page 48 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET

TO THE GOVERNMENT-WIDE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statement.
(31)
Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds $ 45,690,245
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because:

Capital assets used in governmental activities are not current financial resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds balance sheet.

Capital Assets 131,344,939
Accumulated Depreciation (39,516,901)
Total Capital Assets 91,828,038
The net OPEB liability applicable to the City's governmental activities is not due and payable in the current period and accordingly is not reported as fund liabilities. Deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB are only reported in the Statement of Net Position as the changes in these amounts effects only the government-wide statements for governmental activities.

Deferred Outflows of Resources - OPEB Related 412,512
Deferred Inflows of Resources - OPEB Related (9,693)
Net OPEB Liability (135,831)
Total Deferred Outflows and Inflows of Resources 266,988 Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City.

The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in the statement of net position. 338,703
Certain revenues in the governmental funds are deferred inflows of resources because they are not collected within the prescribed time period after year-end. However, these revenues are included in the government-wide statements. 574,051
Net Position of Governmental Activities $ 138,698,025

ATTACHMENT A

Page 49 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statement.
(32)
Lighting
Housing and Median
General Authority Maintenance

REVENUES
Taxes and Assessments 21,190,671 $ - $ $ 634,931
Licenses and Permits 2,091,517 - -
Intergovernmental 379,318 - 1,071
Charges for Services 2,821,788 - 195,242
Fines and Forfeitures 524,705 - -
Interest Income 115,620 17,235 3,375
Rental Income 16,031 562,993 -
Miscellaneous 37,096 1,171 -
Total Revenues 27,176,746 581,399 834,619

EXPENDITURES
Current:

General Government 3,186,663 169,255 -
Public Safety 16,279,119 2,630,896 579,358
Community Development 2,218,329 675,200 -
Public Works 1,094,809 1,750 -
Culture and Recreation 1,290,831 - -
Capital Outlay 71,505 - -
Debt Service:

Principal Retirement - - 1,069,246
Interest and Fiscal Charges - - 35,140
Total Expenditures 24,141,256 3,477,101 1,683,744

EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER
(UNDER EXPENDITURES) 3,035,490 (2,895,702) (849,125)

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Sale of Capital Assets - 210,100 -
Transfers In 605,908 - -
Transfers Out (77,048) - -
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 528,860 210,100 -
NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 3,564,350 (2,685,602) (849,125) .

Fund Balances - Beginning of Year, As Restated 20,634,429 16,761,383 1,322,458 FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $ 24,198,779 $ 14,075,781 $ 473,333 Special Revenue Funds

ATTACHMENT A

Page 50 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES (CONTINUED)

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statements.
(33)
Other Total
Governmental Governmental
Funds Funds

REVENUES
Taxes and Assessments $ 1,334,907 $ 23,160,509
Licenses and Permits 2,091,517 -
Intergovernmental 3,612,212 3,992,601
Charges for Services 1,998,235 5,015,265
Fines and Forfeitures - 524,705
Interest Income 14,953 151,183
Rental Income - 579,024
Miscellaneous 58,338 96,605
Total Revenues 7,018,645 35,611,409

EXPENDITURES
Current:

General Government 1,011,689 4,367,607
Public Safety 1,193,155 20,682,528
Community Development 275,351 3,168,880
Public Works 739,323 1,835,882
Culture and Recreation 430,667 1,721,498
Capital Outlay 810,594 882,099
Debt Service:

Principal Retirement 1,069,246 -
Interest and Fiscal Charges - 35,140
Total Expenditures 4,460,779 33,762,880

EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER
(UNDER EXPENDITURES) 2,557,866 1,848,529

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Sale of Capital Assets - 210,100
Transfers In 1,349,369 1,955,277
Transfers Out (1,796,613) (1,873,661)
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (447,244) 291,716
NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 2,110,622 2,140,245
Fund Balances - Beginning of Year, As Restated 4,831,730 43,550,000 FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR $ 6,942,352 $ 45,690,245

ATTACHMENT A

Page 51 of 204 ends

CITY OF STANTON

RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES,

EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES TO THE GOVERNMENT-WIDE

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
See accompanying Notes to Basic Financial Statements.
(34)
Net Change in Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds $ 2,140,245 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because:

Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over the estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceed depreciation and retirements in the current period.

Capital Asset Purchases 882,099
Depreciation Expense (2,301,642)
Loss on Disposition of Capital Assets (1,590,924)
Total Capital Assets (3,010,467)
The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds.

Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net position.

Principal Payments 1,069,246
Total Long-Term Debt 1,069,246
OPEB expenditures reported in the governmental funds includes the actuarial determined contributions. In the statement of activities, OPEB expense includes the change in the net OPEB liability (asset) and related change in OPEB amounts for deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources. (45,009)
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City.

The net income is reported with governmental activities. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in the statement of net position. This removes the impact of the $360,436 transfer of capital assets from governmental activities to the internal service funds. (166,510) Accrued interest for long-term debt. This is the net change in accrued interest for the current period. 9,317
Certain revenues in the governmental funds are unavailable revenues because they are not collected within the prescribed time period after year-end. However, the revenues are included in the government-wide statements. 462,459
Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities $ 459,281

ATTACHMENT A

Page 52 of 204 ends

Stanton City CouncilMarch 8, 2022

Stanton City Council
March 8, 2022