Agenda — Stanton City Council, August 27, 2024 (part 3 of 4)

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-29

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT

ITS UPDATED FEE FOR THE TRAFFIC VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM IN

THE CITY OF STANTON
WHEREAS, the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department (“the Sheriff”) has instituted a Traffic Violator Apprehension Program designed to reduce vehicle accidents caused by unlicensed drivers and drivers whose licenses are suspended and to educate the public about the requirements of the Vehicle Code and related safety issues with regard to driver licensing, vehicle registration, vehicle operation, and parking; and WHEREAS, the Sheriff operates the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program in the unincorporated areas of Orange County and in cities (such as the City of Stanton) that contract for the Sheriff’s law enforcement services; and WHEREAS, operating the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program on an area-wide basis without regard to jurisdictional boundaries between the County and contract cities serves the public purpose of the City because drivers routinely cross jurisdictional boundaries, making an area-wide approach to reduction of traffic accidents and driver education most effective in preventing traffic accidents in all participating jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2000, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 00-96, which established fees for the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program that are applicable in unincorporated areas of the County. The fees established by County Resolution No. 00-96 address the Sheriff’s administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of properly impounded vehicles; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2000, the Stanton City Council adopted Resolution No. 2000- 57, which authorized the Sheriff to collect fees in the City in connection with the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program in amounts identical to the County’s fees as set forth in County Resolution No. 00-96; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has established an interest-earning, budgeted special revenue fund, called the “Traffic Violator Fund” and designated as Fund 13B, to be controlled by the Sheriff; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has directed that proceeds from the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fees be deposited into the Traffic Violator Fund; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has directed that funds from the Traffic Violator Fund must be used to reimburse the Sheriff for the administrative costs associated with the removal, storage, impound, and release of vehicles in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (“Vehicle Code”); and
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-29

Page 2 of 7 ends

WHEREAS, the Sheriff impounds vehicles removed from highways, public property, and private property in the unincorporated areas of the County and in contract cities pursuant to the following authority under the Vehicle Code:

Vehicle Code Section and Impound Ground
14602.6 Suspended, revoked or unlicensed driver/30-day hold 22651 (a) Unattended vehicle on bridge
22651 (d) Vehicle blocking driveway
22651 (e) Vehicle blocking fire hydrant
22651 (f) Vehicle blocking freeway
22651 (h) (1) Driver arrested
22651 (h) (2) Order of suspension or revocation pursuant to section 13388 22651 (i) (1) Multiple parking citations
22651 (j) Lack of vehicle registration
22651 (k) Parking over seventy-two hours
22651 (l) Parking in a construction zone
22651 (m) Violation of special events restriction
22651 (n) No parking zone
22651 (o) (1) Vehicle registration is incorrect, falsified or expired by more than six months
22651 (p) Driver unlicensed or license suspended
22651 (r) Vehicle blocking another vehicle
22651 (t) Notice to appear/illegal amber lights
22651 (u) Acting as a car dealer without a license or temporary permit 22651 (v) Illegally letting stand a mobile billboard advertisement 22651 (w) Second or subsequent violation of an ordinance 22655.3 Removal for investigation (fleeing in violation of section 2800.1 or 2800.2)
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-29

Page 3 of 7 ends

22655.5 (a) Vehicle was used as the means of committing a public offense 22655.5 (b) Vehicle is evidence of crime
22669 Abandoned vehicle
WHEREAS, Vehicle Code section 22850.5 authorizes the City Council, by resolution, to establish a fee equal to the administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of properly impounded vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Supervisors last adopted a fee pursuant to Vehicle Code section 22850.5 on November 17, 2020, through the adoption of Resolution No. 20-161, which established a fee in the amount of $144.00 when a vehicle of a licensed and unlicensed driver is removed and/or impounded; and
WHEREAS, a cost study prepared in 2024 by the Sheriff demonstrated a need to update the County’s Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fees. The Sheriff’s cost study determined that the Sheriff’s administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of vehicles properly impounded under the Vehicle Code has increased to $174.00 per removal; and
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2024, the Board of Supervisors adopted an updated Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee of $174.00 per removal; and WHEREAS, consistent with the City’s authority under Vehicle Code section 22850.5, the Sheriff has requested that the City update its Traffic Violator Apprehension fees to match the County’s new fee of $174.00 per removal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee to match the County and further desires for the Sheriff to continue to collect the fee on behalf of the City. Continuing with such a practice will ensure that persons whose vehicles are impounded, rather than the public as a whole, will bear the administrative costs of such impounds; and
WHEREAS, Vehicle Code section 22850.5 imposed the following restrictions on the imposition of this administrative fee:
a) The fee may only be imposed on the registered owner or the agents of that owner and may not include any vehicle towed under an abatement program or sold at a lien sale pursuant to Sections 3068.1 to 3074, inclusive, of, and Section 22851 of, the Civil Code unless the sale is sufficient in amount to pay the lienholder’s total charges and proper administrative costs; and b) Any charges shall be collected by the local or state authority only from the registered owner or an agent of the registered owner; and RESOLUTION NO. 2024-29

Page 4 of 7 ends

c) The charges shall be in addition to any other charges authorized or imposed pursuant to this code; and
d) The fee does not include any administrative costs associated with conducting a hearing or appeal relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of a vehicle; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the limitations set forth above, it is also unfair to impose the administrative fee authorized by Vehicle Code section 22850.5 in the following circumstances: 1) when the vehicle was left because it became inoperable while being drive, if the owner makes good faith attempts promptly to remove the vehicle from location where it is not permitted, 2) when the vehicle was stolen, 3) when the vehicle was left by an ill or injured driver, and 4) when it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Sheriff or his/her designee that neither the registered owner of the vehicle nor his/her agent, if any, was at fault in creating the circumstances leading to the impounding of the vehicle; and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing with respect to the proposed new Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee provided herein was given according to law; and WHEREAS, a public hearing pertaining to the new Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee was held on August 27, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The recitals above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and made an operative part of this Resolution.

SECTION 2: The City Council finds that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines, the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080 (b)(8) and Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15273(a)(1) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations because CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Here, this Resolution does not undertake any project that has the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment as the Resolution simply authorizes the Orange County Sheriff’s Department to collect its updated operating costrecovery fee for the removal, impoundment, and storage of vehicles for specified Vehicle Code violations.

SECTION 3: That on July 1, 2024, the administrative fee indicated below shall become effective for the removal, impound, storage, or release of vehicles properly impounded after removal from locations in the City in accordance with or on account of provisions of the Vehicle Code listed below:

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-29

Page 5 of 7 ends

A fee of $174.00 for each removal of a vehicle in accordance with or on account of violation of Vehicle Code sections:
14602.6 Suspended, revoked or unlicensed driver/30-day hold 22651 (a) Unattended vehicle on bridge
22651 (d) Vehicle blocking driveway
22651 (e) Vehicle blocking fire hydrant
22651 (f) Vehicle blocking freeway
22651 (h) (1) Driver arrested
22651 (h) (2) Order of suspension or revocation pursuant to section 13388 22651 (i) (1) Multiple parking citations
22651 (j) Lack of vehicle registration
22651 (k) Parking over seventy-two hours
22651 (l) Parking in a construction zone
22651 (m) Violation of special events restriction
22651 (n) No parking zone
22651 (o) (1) Vehicle registration is incorrect, falsified or expired by more than six months
22651 (p) Driver unlicensed or license suspended
22651 (r) Vehicle blocking another vehicle
22651 (t) Notice to appear/illegal amber lights
22651 (u) Acting as a car dealer without a license or temporary permit 22651 (v) Illegally letting stand a mobile billboard advertisement 22651 (w) Second or subsequent violation of an ordinance 22655.3 Removal for investigation (fleeing in violation of section 2800.1 or 2800.2)
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-29

Page 6 of 7 ends

22655.5 (a) Vehicle was used as the means of committing a public offense 22655.5 (b) Vehicle is evidence of crime
22669 Abandoned vehicle
SECTION 4: The Sheriff is authorized to collect the fee established herein, on behalf of the City, at the time of release of vehicles that are subject to the fee.

SECTION 5: The fee established herein shall only be imposed on the registered owner or the agent of the owner of the impounded vehicle, shall not include any vehicle towed under an abatement program or sold at a lien sale pursuant to Sections 3068.1 to 3074, inclusive of, and Section 22851 of, the Civil Code unless the sale is sufficient in amount to pay the lienholder’s total charges and proper administrative costs.

SECTION 6: The fee established herein shall be collected only from the registered owner or an agent of the registered owner and that said fee is in addition to any other charges authorized or imposed pursuant to the Vehicle Code.

SECTION 7: The fee established herein complies with Vehicle Code section 22850.5 (b)(4) as the cost study conducted by the Sheriff that supports the $174.00 per removal fee did not include administrative costs for conducting a hearing or appeal related to the removal, impound, storage, or release of a vehicle.

SECTION 8: The Sheriff shall not impose the fee established herein in any of the following circumstances: (a) when the vehicle was left because it became inoperable while being driven, if the owner made good faith attempts promptly to remove the vehicle from a location where it was not permitted: (b) when the vehicle was stolen; (c) when the vehicle was left by an ill or injured drive; or (d) when it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Sheriff or his/her designee that neither the registered owner of the vehicle nor his/her agent, if any, was at fault in creating the circumstances leading to the impounding of the vehicle.

SECTION 9: A registered owner or an agent of a registered owner who believes he/she/they are exempt from the fee established herein under any of the criteria listed in Section 8 above may apply in writing for a waiver of the fee and shall present such supporting information or documentation, as the Sheriff may request, to the City’s Administrative Sergeant. Upon the presentation of a written application for waiver of said fee, together with such supporting documentation as may be requested by the Sheriff, the Administrative Sergeant or his/her designee shall determine promptly whether the applicant meets the criteria for a waiver of the fee and if so, shall waive the fee.

SECTION 10: Until further order of the City Council, the Sheriff is directed to deposit the proceeds of the fee established herein into Traffic Violator Fund in the County Treasury.

Proceeds from the Traffic Violator Fund shall be used in conformance with the County’s RESOLUTION NO. 2024-29

Page 7 of 7 ends

restrictions for the same as well as in conformance with any applicable provisions set forth in the City’s agreement with the County for the Sheriff’s law enforcement services.

SECTION 11: Until further order of the City Council, the Board of Supervisors is authorized to carry forward in the Traffic Violator Fund and accumulate any balance of proceeds of fees imposed by this Resolution that remains at the end of a fiscal year, as long as such fee proceeds will be used for the purposes provided herein.

SECTION 12: This Resolution supersedes Resolution No. 2021-08.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day of August, 2024. __________________________
DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________

HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ATTEST:

I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-29 has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the Stanton City Council, held on August 27, 2024, and that the same was adopted, signed and approved by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________________
PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
To: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, Stanton City Manager
From: Dwight Tipping, Law Enforcement Contracts Manager Date: July 15, 2024
RE: County Resolution to Adjust Fees For Vehicle Removal, Impound, Storage or Release of Vehicles On June 25, 2024, the Board of Supervisors approved the proposed increase in the administrative fee for the SheriffCoroner Department for vehicle removal, impound, storage or release of vehicles from $144 to $174 for vehicle removal pursuant to specific Vehicle Code violations and from $144 to $174 for vehicle removal due to driving without a license or with a suspended or revoked license. This supersedes Resolution Number 20-161.

Cities wishing to adopt the newly adopted vehicle release fees will be required to have their City Council’s approve the revised fees as part of their Traffic Violator Apprehension Program (TVAP) resolution. Please notify the Sheriff Law Enforcement Contracts Unit if your City plans on adopting the new fee. The Sheriff also has approval from the Orange County Board of Supervisors to adjust the rates starting July 1, 2025, not to exceed the annual percentage of the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim “all items” Consumer Price Index, provided that the amount does not exceed the actual costs to the Sheriff as determined by additional cost studies for the fee adjustment will ensure Sheriff’s cost recovery.

This will allow Sheriff to have cost recovery for the removal, impound, storage or release of vehicles.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (714) 834-6217.

Thank you.

C: Michelle Bannigan City of Stanton Finance Director
Attachment
Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.

ORDINANCE NO. 1144

Page 1 of 6 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1144

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 20.400.030 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE

PERTAINING TO THE STANDARDS FOR ALCOHOL SALES IN MIXED-USE

OVERLAY AREAS
WHEREAS, Government Code, Section 65800 et seq. authorizes the City of Stanton (“City”) to adopt and administer zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities as a means of implementing the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 20.400.030 of the Stanton Municipal Code contains the current provisions to regulate the sale of alcohol in the City; and WHEREAS, an application was submitted for Zone Code Amendment ZCA 24-01 to allow alcohol sales in mixed-use developments to amend section 20.400.030 and establish appropriate regulations to govern the operations; and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2024, the City gave public notice that the Planning Commission would conduct a public hearing to consider Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 24-01 by posting the public notice at three public places including Stanton City Hall, the Post Office, and the Stanton Community Services Center, and noticing property owners within a 500 foot radius of the Project Site. Additionally, the public notice was published in the Orange County Register on June 7, 2024, and the Planning Commission agenda was made available through the agenda posting process; and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning amendments to Section 20.400.030 of the Stanton Municipal Code, provided comments on the amendments, and voted to forward the proposed ordinance to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption; and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2024, the City gave public notice that the City Council would conduct a public hearing to consider Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 24-01 by posting the public notice at three public places including Stanton City Hall, the Post Office, and the Stanton Community Services Center, and noticing property owners within a 500-foot radius of the Project Site. Additionally, the public notice was published in the Orange County Register on July 11, 2024, and the City Council agenda was made available through the agenda posting process; and
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2024, the City Council held a first reading and duly noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning amendments to Section 20.400.030 of the Stanton Municipal Code, and provided comments on the amendments; and
Item: 11A
Click here to return to the agenda.

ORDINANCE NO. 1144

Page 2 of 6 ends

WHEREAS, on August 27, 2024, the City Council held a second reading and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and testimony taken at the first reading concerning amendments to Section 20.400.030 of the Stanton Municipal Code, provided comments on the amendments, and voted to approve the proposed ordinance; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds that all the facts, findings and conclusions set forth above in this Ordinance are true and correct.

SECTION 2: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Stanton determines that the project is categorically exempt under Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) where the request involves interior alterations to an existing commercial tenant space within an existing mixed-use development. The proposed Code Amendment is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have the potential for causing a significant impact on the environment. The proposed amendments introduce clarifying regulations for a use that is already permitted in the City and will not result in potential new significant impacts.

SECTION 3: In accordance with the requirements as set forth in Section 20.610.060 of the Stanton Municipal Code for Zoning Code Amendments the City Council hereby makes the following findings:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. The City of Stanton General Plan Land Use Designation for the subject property is South Gateway Mixed Use (SGMX) District. Per the General Plan, mixed use designations are intended for the development of a mix of residential, commercial, and office uses that encourage revitalization or future development in strategic areas of the city; encourage the combination of some commercial activity with other reinforcing land uses, especially residential, to create economically and aesthetically pleasing projects; provide property owners the flexibility to adapt project design to market forces to encourage quality development; and, support and reinforce commercial activity with increased densities, intensities and flexibility. The amendment is consistent with the intent of these goals. The proposed amendment updates an existing code that established separation requirements before mixed-use buildings had been developed within the City. The separation requirements did not envision a development where a commercial business and residential development were located on the same property and their strict application now creates an impediment to promote economic revitalization along mixed-use corridors.

Further, the amendment is internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan, specifically:

ORDINANCE NO. 1144

Page 3 of 6 ends

Goal ED-2.2: Promote economic revitalization at key locations within the city, specifically the major arterials, Beach Boulevard and Katella Avenue, which carry commuters and other travelers through Stanton. The proposed code amendment will allow for a greater number of uses within the mixed-use corridors along Beach Boulevard and Katella Avenue.

Strategy 2.2.1: Encourage mixed-use development along major corridors, specifically Beach Boulevard and Katella Avenue, as well as at major city intersections and activity nodes. The amendment would provide for additional commercial uses that are complimented by alcohol sales throughout mixed-use nodes, which will benefit existing and future commercial activity on Beach Boulevard, and contribute to the City’s economic base.

Action RC-2.1.6(b) Encourage development of underutilized and vacant infill sites where public services and infrastructure are available. The amendment would provide a larger number of potential uses that can be incorporated into mixed-use developments. The amendment will allow for the on-site and off-site sale of alcohol to be provided as a compliment to other businesses such as bonafide public eating places. The Mixed-Use Overlay areas are generally located along the Beach Boulevard, which is an urbanized infill area and therefore public services and infrastructure are readily accessible and available to serve the sites within the district.

2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The on-site and off-site sale of alcoholic beverages is conditionally permitted throughout the City and Section

20.400 of the Stanton Municipal Code has established regulations to ensure the operation of such establishments are not detrimental to surrounding properties.

The proposed amendment will increase the ability for economic vitality by increasing the number of potential uses that can be incorporated into mixed-use developments. The amendment maintains the 300-foot separation requirements from off-site alcohol sales so that there is some separation between such uses and not create a concentration. The sale of alcohol, both on and off-site, is a complimentary commercial amenity that has not caused a detriment to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare when the existing operational standards are applied. The inclusion of this use in new mixed-use developments will be consistent with this use throughout other areas of the City.

3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code. Stanton Municipal Code Section 20.400 is dedicated to the operations of businesses that sell, serve, or give away alcoholic beverages. The municipal code has established operational standards in place to deter any potentially negative impacts. The proposed amendment will allow additional commercial opportunities in mixed-use developments which is consistent with the intent of the Mixed-Use Overlays and Zoning Code in ORDINANCE NO. 1144

Page 4 of 6 ends

general.

SECTION 4: Section 20.400.030.B.1 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

20.400.030.B Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. The following uses that sell alcoholic beverages for on-site or off-site consumption and operate under an Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license shall obtain a Conditional Use Permit in compliance with Chapter 20.500 (Permit Application Filing and Processing) including the following:

1. Bona fide public eating places whose predominant function is the service of food and where on-site sales of alcoholic beverages are incidental or secondary. Bona fide public eating places are defined by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

SECTION 5: Section 20.400.030.D.1.b of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

20.400.030.D.1.b The following establishments shall be exempt from these minimum separation distances:

1. Bona-fide public eating places that sell, serve, or give away alcoholic beverages;

2. Retail markets over 10,000 square feet with no more than 10 percent of their floor area devoted to sales, display and storage of alcoholic beverages. Notwithstanding the foregoing, these retail markets shall comply with all separation and other requirements established by State law; and

3. Retail markets associated with service stations with no more than five percent of their floor area devoted to sales display and storage of alcoholic beverages. Notwithstanding the foregoing, these retail markets shall comply with all separation and other requirements established by State law and are subject to the following requirements:
i. A business shall not sell any type of quantity of alcoholic beverages between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. per California State law.
ii. A height marker shall be placed at each exit to enable witnesses to a crime to estimate the height of the perpetrator.
iii. A minimum of two signs shall be posted in prominent locations to inform patrons that no alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on the premises.
iv. Alcoholic beverage containers shall not be placed in opaque bags or boxes at or after the time of sale except where the volume of alcohol purchased is in excess of three liters.

4. Mixed Use Projects within Mixed-Use Overlay areas or Mixed-Use Districts as designated by the Zoning Map or a Specific Plan. On-sale or ORDINANCE NO. 1144

Page 5 of 6 ends

off-sale establishments within mixed-use development projects shall be subject to provisions of subsection 3, above, and the following requirements:
i. On-site alcohol sales shall not have any distance requirements from similar uses.
ii. Off-site alcohol sales must maintain a 300-foot distance from another establishment that provides off-site alcohol sales.

SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Stanton hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause same to be posted in the three (3) designated posting places within the City of Stanton within fifteen (15) days after its passage.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day of August, 2024.

DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM

HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO. 1144

Page 6 of 6 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF STANTON )
I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1144 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Stanton, California, held on the 23rd day of July, 2024 and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 27th day of August, 2024, by the following roll-call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1146 AMENDING CHAPTER

20.540 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE

REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY USES
REPORT IN BRIEF:

At its regular meeting of May 14, 2024, the City Council requested information from staff regarding the Special Event and Temporary Use Permit process. The City Council then directed staff to review the existing regulations for Special Event and Temporary Use Permits and return with appropriate amendments that would support existing businesses and newer trends. Staff reviewed Chapter 20.540 and prepared an Ordinance with updates to allow additional flexibility and options for new special event trends and streamline the application process. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, 2024, and voted to approve the Resolution recommending adoption of the proposed Ordinance with an amendment.

The City Council is asked to consider the proposed Ordinance and recommended amendment for Chapter 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code to update regulations for temporary uses. The City Council has the discretion to accept the proposed Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission or make additional appropriate modifications.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council conduct the public hearing and first reading of Ordinance No. 1146, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 20.540 OF THE STANTON

MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY
USES”; and

2. Declare that the project is exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under section 15061(b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have a significant impact on the environment; and
Item: 12A
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 3. Set September 10, 2024, as the date for second reading for adoption of Ordinance No. 1146.

BACKGROUND:

The Stanton Municipal Code (SMC) regulates all land uses through Title 20 Zoning, which establishes which land use types are permitted in each zone along with operational standards and development standards intended to reduce impacts between different uses. While most of Title 20 establishes standards for permanent operations on private property throughout the City, SMC § 20.540 establishes procedures and regulations for temporary uses of property that may occasionally occur in conjunction with various land uses throughout the City. Typical examples of these uses are grand openings, seasonal sales such as Christmas Tree Sales or Pumpkin Patches, charitable car washes, carnivals, temporary outdoor sales, and similar activities.

The SMC defines a Temporary Use as a land use that is interim, non-permanent, and/or seasonal in nature, and generally not conducted for more than 30 consecutive days in duration. Special Events are defined as a retail outdoor sales event that is associated with a permanently established business and that may occur periodically throughout the course of a year.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

The Zoning Code has specific standards for Temporary Uses and Special Events which were initially meant to be universal and applicable to all businesses. However, as business models and trends evolve over time, there is a need to update code provisions to accommodate newer trends. One example is Rodeo 39, a shopping arcade/market hall business with various businesses sharing a large space. This model encourages visitors who visit one business to explore other offerings. The business has found that the best marketing for their concept is to hold various pop-up markets throughout the year. Temporary events are held during weekends where small businesses present their items for sale. This form of marketing has drawn new visitors and customers to discover Rodeo 39; however, the existing regulations in the Zoning Code limit these events to no more than six per year.

In order to remain up to date with the needs of the City’s businesses and allow flexibility in the operation of Temporary Uses, staff developed new regulations in the proposed Ordinance that would allow two (2) Temporary Use events per month for shopping arcades/market halls. Additionally, the proposed Ordinance included some clarification of language and various provisions to further streamline the review process for all Temporary Uses and Special Events.

The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, 2024, to discuss the proposed amendments to the Temporary Uses chapter of the Zoning Code. During this discussion, the Planning Commission expressed concern over the proposed Ordinance’s recommendation to increase the number of Temporary Uses from six per 3 year to a maximum of up to twenty-four per year. The Planning Commission voted to recommend this be amended to allow a maximum of twelve per year, not two per month. The Planning Commission discussed and acknowledged that the City Council has the discretion to revert to staff’s original recommendation, accept their recommendation, or make any other alteration they deem appropriate. The concerns expressed by the Planning Commission were centered around the significant increase and potential intensification of activity in commercial centers that may impact other businesses or visitors. The Planning Commission recommended allowing up to twelve per year to observe any potential impacts and, if no negative impacts are noted, an additional amendment can be made after one year. The Planning Commission agreed that additional flexibility was needed in the code and supported all other modifications in the Ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

The proposed project was determined to be Categorically Exempt from CEQA, per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, under Section 15061 (b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have a significant impact on the environment.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

Obj. No. 2: Promote a strong local economy.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Orange County Register on August 16, 2024. The notice was also posted at three public locations and made public through the agenda-posting process.

Prepared by: Crystal Landavazo, Community and Economic Development Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachment:

A. Draft Ordinance No. 1146
B. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2568
ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 1 of 12 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 20.540 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO

THE STANDARDS FOR TEMPORARY USES AND SPECIAL EVENTS
WHEREAS, Government Code, Section 65800 et seq. authorizes the City of Stanton (“City”) to adopt and administer zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities as a means of implementing the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code contains the current provisions to regulate temporary uses and special events in the City; and WHEREAS, direction was given to review the Municipal Code and amend section 20.540 as needed to establish updated and appropriate regulations to govern the operations; and WHEREAS, review of Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code revealed need for clarification of language to clarify, update, and further streamline Temporary Uses and Special Events for all uses; and
WHEREAS, on July 3, 2024, the City gave public notice that the Planning Commission would conduct a public hearing to consider Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 24-02 by posting the public notice at three public places including Stanton City Hall, the Post Office, and the Stanton Community Services Center, and publishing the notice in the Orange County Register on July 8, 2024, and the Planning Commission agenda was made available through the agenda posting process; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning amendments to Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code, provided comments on the amendments, and voted to forward the proposed ordinance to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption; and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2024, the City gave public notice that the City Council would conduct a public hearing to consider Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 24-02 by posting the public notice at three public places including Stanton City Hall, the Post Office, and the Stanton Community Services Center. Additionally, the public notice was published in the Orange County Register on August 16, 2024, and the City Council agenda was made available through the agenda posting process; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2024, the City Council held a first reading and duly noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning amendments to Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code, and provided comments on the amendments; and
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 2 of 12 ends

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2024, the City Council held a second reading and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and testimony taken at the first reading concerning amendments to Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code, provided comments on the amendments, and voted to approve the proposed ordinance; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds that all the facts, findings and conclusions set forth above in this Ordinance are true and correct.

SECTION 2: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Stanton determines that the proposed Code Amendment is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have the potential for causing a significant impact on the environment. The proposed amendments introduce clarifying regulations for a use that is already permitted in the City and will not result in potential new significant impacts.

SECTION 3: In accordance with the requirements as set forth in Section 20.610.060 of the Stanton Municipal Code for Zoning Code Amendments the City Council hereby makes the following findings:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. The City of Stanton General Plan identifies that commercial zones and mixed-use zones are to encourage revitalization or future development in strategic areas of the city; encourage the combination of some commercial activity with other reinforcing land uses, to create economically and aesthetically pleasing projects; provide property owners the flexibility to adapt project design to market forces to encourage quality development; and, support and reinforce commercial activity with increased densities, intensities and flexibility. The amendment is consistent with the intent of these goals. The proposed amendment updates an existing code that established regulations for the operation of Temporary Uses and Special Events to assist in promoting local businesses. The proposed amendment is intended to update existing code regulations to update and address newer business models and trends not addressed by existing code regulations. The amendment is internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan, specifically:

Goal ED-2.2: Promote economic revitalization at key locations within the city, specifically the major arterials, Beach Boulevard and Katella Avenue, which carry commuters and other travelers through Stanton. The proposed code amendment will allow for additional flexibility and opportunity for local businesses to promote their businesses.

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 3 of 12 ends

2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code has established regulations to ensure the operation of temporary uses and special events are not detrimental to surrounding properties. The proposed amendment will increase the ability for economic vitality by increasing the number of potential uses that can be to promote commercial and retail businesses throughout the City. Temporary Uses and Special Events are complimentary commercial amenities that have not caused a detriment to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare when the existing operational standards are applied. The new provisions provide similar conditions to ensure the preservation of public interest, health, safety, convenience, and welfare.

3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code. The proposed amendment provides clarifying language and provisions for uses that were previously permitted in commercial and retail areas of the City. The municipal code has established operational standards in place to deter any potentially negative impacts and the proposed amendment will allow additional commercial opportunities.

SECTION 4: Section 20.540.030.A of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

20.540.030. Applicability.

A. Minor short-term activities.

1. A Temporary Use Permit allows short-term activities that might not meet the normal development or use standards of the applicable zone, but may otherwise be acceptable because of their temporary nature.

2. A Special Event Permit is an annual permit authorizing special events (i.e., outdoor retail sales event associated with a permanent business) for a period of up to 12 3 days for each calendar month in a up to 4 times per calendar year.

SECTION 5: Section 20.540.050.J of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby deleted as follows:

20.540.050. Allowed Temporary Uses
The following temporary uses are allowed, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit, and only when conducted in compliance with Section 20.540.090 (Conditions of Approval), below.

A. Car washes. Car washes, limited to one event each month for each sponsoring organization, not exceeding three days in length. Sponsorship shall be limited to educational, fraternal, religious, or service organizations directly engaged in civic or charitable efforts, or to tax exempt organizations in compliance with 501(c) of the Federal Internal Revenue Code.

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 4 of 12 ends

B. Contractors' construction yards - off-site. The permit may be effective for up to 12 months, or the expiration of the companion Building Permit, authorizing the construction project, whichever first occurs.

C. Entertainment/leisure gatherings. Events not associated with a permanently established business and not held on premises designed to accommodate such events (e.g., auditoriums, stadiums, etc.) including the following:

1. Amusement rides, arts and crafts exhibits, auctions, carnivals, circuses, concerts, fairs, farmer's markets, festivals, flea markets, food events, outdoor entertainment/sporting events, rodeos, rummage sales, second-hand sales, and swap meets for 14 consecutive days or less, or six three-day weekends, within a 12-month period.

2. Outdoor gatherings/meetings and group activities (e.g., neighborhood festivals, etc.) for seven consecutive days or less, within a 12-month period. The 12 month limitation is per group.

D. Fireworks sales. Fireworks sales that are in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 17.04 (Safe and Sane Fireworks).

E. On-location filming. The temporary use of a specified and approved on-location site for occasional commercial filming (e.g., commercials, movie(s), videos, etc.) on location in compliance with Government Code Section 65850.1. The Director shall find that the approval would not result in a frequency of use likely to create incompatibility between the temporary filming activity and the surrounding areas.

F. Storage during construction. Storage of equipment during construction activities for up to 12 months, or the expiration of the companion Building Permit, authorizing the construction project, whichever first occurs.

G. Temporary sales trailers.

1. A trailer may be used for temporary sales activities (e.g., model home sales, etc.) in approved development projects and with a valid Building Permit.

2. A permit for temporary sales trailer(s) may be approved for up to 12 months.

H. Temporary structures. A temporary classroom, office, or similar portable structure, including a manufactured or mobile unit, may be approved, for a maximum time period of 12 months, as an accessory use or as the first phase of a development project, in the commercial and industrial zones.

I. Temporary work trailers.

1. A trailer or mobile home may be used as a temporary work site for employees of a business:
a. During construction or remodeling of a permanent commercial, industrial, or ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 5 of 12 ends

mixed-use structure, when a valid Building Permit is in force; or b. Upon demonstration by the applicant that the temporary work site is a shortterm necessity, while a permanent work site is being obtained.

2. A permit for temporary work trailer(s) may be approved for up to 12 months.

J. City-sponsored uses and activities. City-sponsored uses and activities not occupying a structure and occurring at regular periodic intervals (weekly, monthly, yearly, etc.).

K. Civic and philanthropic events on publicly-owned property. Events that are to be conducted on publicly-owned property and are sponsored by educational, fraternal, religious, or service organizations directly engaged in civic or charitable efforts, or by tax-exempt organizations in compliance with 501(c) of the Federal Internal Revenue Code.

L. Other similar temporary uses. Similar temporary uses that, in the opinion of the Director, are compatible with the subject zone and surrounding land uses.

M. Seasonal sales.

1. Where allowed. A temporary seasonal sales facility for the sale of Christmas trees or Halloween pumpkins is allowed adjacent to any principal, major, or primary arterial, as identified in General Plan Exhibit 5-1 (Roadway Classifications), in any zone and on all religious institution sites or school sites.

2. Time limit. Outdoor seasonal sales activities shall be limited to the following. a. Christmas tree sales facility may be open from the day after Thanksgiving through December 26th of the same calendar year.
b. A Halloween pumpkin sales facility may be open for business from October 1st through October 31st of the same calendar year.

3. Merchandise to be sold. A Christmas tree or Halloween pumpkin sales facility shall only sell items directly associated with that season.

4. Post-event clean-up. The lot shall be returned to its original state within five days after the expiration of the Temporary Use Permit. The Director may require a guarantee or security deposit to ensure that the lot is properly cleaned-up.

N. Shopping Arcade/Market Hall. A commercial establishment that contains any ten or more commercial uses occupying designated spaces within an enclosed or semi-enclosed structure and where no use is accessory to another principal use.

Examples of shopping arcade include food halls and market halls. Temporary Uses under these provisions are applicable to the business as a whole, not each individual business within the building.

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 6 of 12 ends

1. Each sale shall be limited to a period of three consecutive days.

2. A maximum of twotwelve events shall be allowed each monthcalendar year.

3. The items to be sold are not required to be of the same type that are regularly displayed and sold at the business location.

4. The activity shall not pose a hazard to pedestrians or encroach on a required building exit.

SECTION 6: Section 20.540.060. of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

20.540.060. Special Event Permits.

A. Allowed special event/retail outdoor sales uses. A Special Event/Retail Outdoor Sales Permit is required for any outdoor display, including tents, and sales of merchandise associated with a permanently established business within commercial zones. Such uses are also permitted on retail properties located on Monroe Avenue within Industrial zones.

B. Allowed additional signs. Refer to Section 20.20.325 (Signs) for a list of additional temporary signs permitted during special events.

C. Special events at multi-tenant commercial centers. One tenant within a multitenant commercial center may hold a special event at one time. If the center wishes to allow more than one tenant to hold a special event at a time, a sign program shall be submitted and approved by the Director in compliance with Section 20.325.130 (Sign Program). If or if all tenants within the same commercial center propose a center-wide special event, the Director may approve the event(s) without requiring a sign program to be in place.

D. Parking lot and sidewalk sales. Parking lot and sidewalk sales shall comply with the following standards:

1. Each sale shall be limited to a period of three consecutive days.

2. A maximum of threefour sales shall be allowed for each business during each calendar year; however, one additional sale may be allowed for any business located within a shopping center provided that at least 50 percent of the businesses occupying the center participate concurrently in the sale.

3. The applicant for a sidewalk sale shall obtain the written authorization of the property owner and shall provide proof of notification at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale to all other businesses on the same lot, or within the same shopping center, that a parking lot or sidewalk sale will be conducted, the times ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 7 of 12 ends

it will be conducted, and that no other sale within 30 days of the subject sale will be allowed.

4. The items to be sold are of the same type that are regularly displayed and sold at the business location.

5. The activity shall not pose a hazard to pedestrians or encroach on a required building exit.

6. Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be provided at all times.

7. Adequate parking shall be provided and maintained during the course of the activity for both the business of the applicant and all other businesses on the same lot or within the same shopping center.

SECTION 7: Section 20.540.080.A of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

20.540.080. Application Filing, Processing, and Review.

A. Filing. An application for a Temporary Use Permit or a Special Event/Retail Outdoor Sales Permit shall be filed with the Department in the following manner:

1. An application for a Temporary Use Permit or a Special Event/Retail Outdoor Sales Permit shall be filed and processed in compliance with Chapter 20.500 (Permit Application Filing and Processing). The application shall include the information and materials specified in the Department handout for Temporary Use Permit or Special Event/Retail Outdoor Sales Permit applications, together with payment of the required fee in compliance with the City's Planning Fee Schedule.

2. The application shall be filed with the Department at least 1030 days before the date that the proposed temporary use is scheduled to take place.

3. The application shall include the property owner's written authorization to use the property and proof of a valid Business License.

4. The application must include proof of Orange County Fire Authority approval.

4. 5. For Special Event/Retail Outdoor Sales Permit applications, the applicant shall indicate the dates and duration of each special event that would be held throughout the calendar year. Special Event Permits are annual permits. These permits may be modified obtained up to four times in a calendar year for a minor fee identified in the Planning Fee Schedule.

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 8 of 12 ends

SECTION 8: Section 20.540.090 of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

20.540.090. Findings and Decision.

A. Director's review. The Director shall review applications and shall record the decisions in writing with the findings on which the decisions are based.

B. Required findings. The Director (or the Commission on a referral) may approve a Temporary Use Permit or Special Event Permit application, with or without conditions, only if it first makes all of the following findings:

1. The operation of the requested temporary use at the location proposed and within the time period specified will not jeopardize, endanger, or otherwise constitute a menace to the public convenience, health, safety, or general welfare;

2. The proposed parcel is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the temporary use without material detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties located adjacent to and in the vicinity of the parcel;

3. The proposed parcel is adequately served by streets or highways having sufficient width and improvements to accommodate the kind and quantity of traffic that the temporary use will or could reasonably be expected to generate;

4. Adequate temporary parking to accommodate vehicular traffic to be generated by the temporary use will be available either on-site or at alternate locations acceptable to the Director; and

5. The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions imposed by the review authority in the approval of the Temporary Use Permit.

C. Special Events in compliance with Section 20.540.060.D may be approved by the Director or designee subject to appropriate conditions of approval as specified in Section 20. 540.100.

SECTION 9: Section 20.540.100.B of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 9 of 12 ends

20.540.100. Conditions of Approval.

B. Appropriate conditions. Conditions of approval may include any of the following:

1. Fixed period of time.
a. For a temporary use not occupying a structure, a Temporary Use Permit shall be valid for a fixed period of time not to exceed 30 days. b. For promotional activities, a Special Event/Retail Outdoor Sales Permit shall be valid for a fixed period of time not to exceed 12 months. c. For all other temporary uses or structures, a Temporary Use Permit shall be valid for a fixed period of time not to exceed 12 months. d. Permits may be issued for a shorter period of time as determined appropriate by the Director.
e. Permits may be granted an extension of time in compliance with Section 20.540.100 20.540.110 (Extensions for Temporary Use Permits), below.

2. Operating hours and days. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the temporary use, as identified in Subsection 1., above;

3. The applicant must agree in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions imposed by the review authority in the approval of the Temporary Use or Special Event Permit.

3. 4. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation. Provision for adequate temporary pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking facilities (including vehicular ingress and egress), and public transportation, if applicable;

4. 5. Nuisance factors. Regulation of nuisance factors including prevention of glare or direct illumination on adjacent parcels, dirt, dust, gases, heat, noise, odors, smoke, trash, and vibration;

5. 6. Dimensions and placement of temporary structures. Regulation of temporary structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards;

6. 7. Sanitary and medical facilities. Provision for sanitary and medical facilities, as appropriate;

7. 8. Utilities. Requirements for placement of electrical wiring and outlets; ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 10 of 12 ends

8. 9. Waste collection, recycling, and/or disposal. Provision for solid, hazardous, and toxic waste collection, recycling, and/or disposal;

9. 10. Police/security and safety measures. Provision for police/security and safety measures, as appropriate;

10. 11. Signs. Regulation of signs;

11. 12. Performance bond or other security. Submission of a performance bond or other security measures, in compliance with Section 20.565.070 (Performance Guarantee) and satisfactory to the Director, to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition, or better, as determined by the Director;

12. 13. Compliance with applicable provisions. A requirement that the approval of the requested Temporary Use Permit is contingent upon compliance with applicable provisions of the Municipal Code and the successful approval of any/all required permits from any other department or governing agency; and

13. 14. Other conditions. Other conditions that would ensure the operation of the proposed temporary use in an orderly and efficient manner, and in full compliance with the purpose of this Chapter.

SECTION 10: Section 20.540.130.B of the Stanton Municipal Code is hereby deleted as follows:

20.540.130. Post-Decision Procedures.

B. For Special Event Permits, the Special Event Permit may be amended a maximum of four times throughout the calendar year. If the special event permit requires additional amendments, a new Special Event Permit application shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director.

SECTION 11: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Stanton hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 11 of 12 ends

SECTION 12: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause same to be posted in the three (3) designated posting places within the City of Stanton within fifteen (15) days after its passage.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 2024.

DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM

HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO. 1146

Page 12 of 12 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF STANTON )
I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1146 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Stanton, California, held on the 27th day of August, 2024 and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 10th day of September, 2024, by the following roll-call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2568

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

STANTON RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING CODE AMENDMENT ZCA 24-02
AMENDING SECTION 20.540 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE

PERTAINING TO TEMPORARY USES
WHEREAS, Government Code, Section 65800 et seq. authorizes the City of Stanton (“City”) to adopt and administer zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities as a means of implementing the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code contains the current provisions to regulate temporary uses and special events in the City; and WHEREAS, direction was given to review the Municipal Code and amend section 20.540 as needed to establish updated and appropriate regulations to govern the operations; and WHEREAS, review of Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code revealed need for clarification of language to clarify, update, and further streamline Temporary Uses and Special Events for all uses; and
WHEREAS, on July 3, 2024, the City gave public notice that the Planning Commission would conduct a public hearing to consider Zoning Code Amendment ZCA 24-02 by posting the public notice at three public places including Stanton City Hall, the Post Office, and the Stanton Community Services Center, and publishing the notice in the Orange County Register on July 8, 2024, and the Planning Commission agenda was made available through the agenda posting process; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning amendments to Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code, provided comments on the amendments, and voted to forward the proposed ordinance to the City Council with a recommendation in favor of its adoption; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project was determined to be Categorically Exempt from CEQA, per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, under Section 15061 (b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have a significant impact on the environment.; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.

Resolution No. 2568
July 17, 2024
Pg. 2

NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STANTON DOES HEREBY FIND:

SECTION 1: Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the fact, findings and conclusions set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2: The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find the proposed Code Amendment is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have the potential for causing a significant impact on the environment. The proposed amendments introduce clarifying regulations for a use that is already permitted in the City and will not result in potential new significant impacts.

SECTION 3: In accordance with the requirements as set forth in Section 20.610.060 of the Stanton Municipal Code for Zoning Code Amendments the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council make the following findings:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan;
The City of Stanton General Plan identifies that commercial zones and mixeduse zones are to encourage revitalization or future development in strategic areas of the city; encourage the combination of some commercial activity with other reinforcing land uses, to create economically and aesthetically pleasing projects; provide property owners the flexibility to adapt project design to market forces to encourage quality development; and, support and reinforce commercial activity with increased densities, intensities and flexibility. The amendment is consistent with the intent of these goals. The proposed amendment updates an existing code that established regulations for the operation of Temporary Uses and Special Events to assist in promoting local businesses. The proposed amendment is intended to update existing code regulations to update and address newer business models and trends not addressed by existing code regulations. The amendment is internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan, specifically:

The proposed code amendment will allow for additional flexibility and opportunity for local businesses to promote their businesses.

2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City;
Section 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code has established regulations to ensure the operation of temporary uses and special events are not detrimental to Resolution No. 2568
July 17, 2024
Pg. 3
surrounding properties. The proposed amendment will increase the ability for economic vitality by increasing the number of potential uses that can be to promote commercial and retail businesses throughout the City. Temporary Uses and Special Events are complimentary commercial amenities that have not caused a detriment to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare when the existing operational standards are applied. The new provisions provide similar conditions to ensure the preservation of public interest, health, safety, convenience, and welfare.

3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code.

The proposed amendment provides clarifying language and provisions for uses that were previously permitted in commercial and retail areas of the City. The municipal code has established operational standards in place to deter any potentially negative impacts and the proposed amendment will allow additional commercial opportunities.

SECTION 4: Custodian and Location of Records. The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Stanton City Hall, 7800 Katella Ave., Stanton, California 90680. The Director of Community and Economic Development is the custodian of the record of proceedings.

SECTION 5: Planning Commission Recommendation. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve ZCA 24-02 attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, entitled, " AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 20.540 OF THE

STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE STANDARDS FOR
TEMPORARY USES AND SPECIAL EVENTS". The Planning Commission’s recommendation is made upon review of the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and all documentary evidence presented on the amendments.

Resolution No. 2568
July 17, 2024
Pg. 4
SECTION 6: Certification. The Planning Commission Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and cause a copy to be transmitted to the City Clerk.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Stanton at a regular meeting held on July 17, 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Frazier, Ash, Tran

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Tran, Sanchez
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:

Thomas Adams, Chairperson
Stanton Planning Commission

Crystal Landavazo
Planning Commission Secretary

CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.04 OF TITLE 10 OF THE

CITY OF STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO IMPLEMENT THE SPEED

LIMITS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC

SURVEYS AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The City Engineer recommends that the City Council accept the engineering and traffic survey and consider an ordinance updating the prima facie speed limits at various locations throughout the City to best protect the health and safety of residents.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

1. City Council declare the action to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15378(b)(5) – Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment; and

2. Approve the 2024 Engineering and Traffic Survey to establish speed limits in the City of Stanton; and

3. Introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1149, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON AMENDING CHAPTER 10.04 OF TITLE 10 OF THE STANTON

MUNICIPAL CODE TO IMPLEMENT THE SPEED LIMITS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS”; and

4. Set September 10, 2024, as the date for second reading for adoption of Ordinance No. 1149.

Item: 12B
Click here to return to the agenda.

BACKGROUND:

The California Vehicle Code allows cities to set specific speed limits for streets within their boundaries. In Stanton, the City has previously set specific speed limits between 15 and 45 miles per hour, based on engineering and traffic surveys. Within these surveys, the traffic engineers study factors such as street collision history, pedestrian and bicycle traffic, speed of traffic, and roadway characteristics. After considering these factors, traffic engineers set speed limits either at or very close to the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed at which 85 percent of traffic is moving. This factor is the primary guide in determining what speeds the majority of safe and reasonable drivers are traveling. Additionally, Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires cities to have all speed limits justified by an engineer and traffic survey either every seven (7) years, or every fourteen (14) years, if an engineer first determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred. The City was due to complete this survey again.

In order to comply with the California Vehicle Code, staff and the City’s traffic engineering consultant firm Hartzog and Crabill developed the 2024 Engineering and Traffic Survey, which establishes speed limits in the City. The survey evaluated roadway segments at thirty-seven (37) different locations in the City along Cerritos Avenue, Chapman Avenue, Dale Street, Fern Street, Garden Grove Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Knott Avenue, Lampson Avenue, Magnolia Street, Orangewood Avenue, Santa Rosalia Street, Syracuse Avenue, Village Center Drive, and Western Avenue.

ANALYSIS AND JUSTIFICATION:

Hartzog and Crabill developed recommendations for prima facie speed limits in the City.

Prima facie speed limits are default limits that motorists are required to obey unless other factors necessitate higher or lower speeds. The recommended speed limits are close to the 85th percentile speed at each location surveyed.

Hartzog and Crabill determined that the justified prima facie speed limit matched the current speed limit at 32 of the 37 surveyed segments, thus denoting them as “no speed limit change” locations. Of these 32 segments, six (6) required additional postage of the speed limit, to account for only one direction of travel currently being posted. As for the other five (5) segments, new speed limits were either proposed or established.

Three (3) of the remaining five (5) segments were previously established as “residence districts”, in a previous Engineering and Traffic study. Residence Districts are defined, under Section 515 of the CVC, as properties with one or both sides contiguous to a highway and within a quarter mile distance of thirteen (13) or more occupied separate dwelling houses. For these three residence districts, the City may remove existing speed signs, as the CVC sets their speed limit as twenty-five (25) MPH, but it is recommended that the City keep the limit posted to ensure residents and drivers are aware and informed of the change:

Santa Rosalia Steet
- Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave.
- Chapman Ave. to Lampson Ave.

Syracuse Avenue
- Knott Ave. to Western St.

Furthermore, only two (2) of the 37 segments were recommended for limit updates. The Dale Street from Chapman Avenue to Barr Lane segment has no posted speed limit, despite the area being surrounded with school crosswalks and an 85th percentile speed of 38.6 MPH, thus the recommended speed limit to be adopted and posted is 35 MPH.

Similarly, the Orangewood Avenue from Western Avenue to East End segment also has no posted speed limit, but is adjacent to business industrial complexes and residential properties, thus prompting a recommended speed limit of 25 MPH to be posted. Each change would ensure compliance with the CVC, while protecting the health and safety of residents, and should be accepted by the Council.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact will be limited to the cost required for the City Engineer and staff to purchase and install newly amended speed limit signs and areas without proper postings.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This action is categorically exempt under CEQA under Section 15378(b)(5) – organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment, given that it solely involves updating speed limits.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notice for this item was made through the regular agenda process.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The staff report, ordinance, and related documents have been reviewed by the City Attorney.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES:

Obj. No. 1: Provide a safe community.

Obj. No. 5 : Provide a high quality of life.

Prepared by: Cesar Rangel, Director of Public Works
Reviewed by: HongDao Nguyen, City Attorney
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Ordinance No. 1149
B. Redline of Ordinance
C. Engineering and Traffic
Survey
ORDINANCE NO. 1149
PAGE 1 OF 5
ORDINANCE NO. 1149

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON AMENDING CHAPTER 10.04 OF TITLE 10 OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO

IMPLEMENT THE SPEED LIMITS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT ENGINEERING

AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code sections 22357 and 22358 authorize the City to increase and decrease its local speed limits; and
WHEREAS, Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. recently completed an engineering and traffic survey for the City of Stanton on a number of streets throughout the City that is compliant with Vehicle Code section 627; and
WHEREAS, there were a total of 37 road segments surveyed; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer and the Orange County Sheriff’s Department have reviewed the engineering and traffic survey results and both offices recommend approval and implementation of the report’s recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish new speed limits in the areas as determined appropriate based on the engineering and traffic study, and to confirm the prima facie speed limits for those segments as deemed appropriate by the engineering and traffic study; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the new speed limits will facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the new speed limits are safe and reasonable; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the applicable engineering and traffic surveys are on file in the offices of the City Clerk and the City Engineer and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Recitals. The above recitals are hereby found to be true and accurate and are incorporated into this Ordinance as findings of the City Council by this reference.

SECTION 2: Amendment of Chapter 10.04. Chapter 10.04 is hereby amended in the City of Stanton Municipal Code in its entirety to read as follows:

Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

ORDINANCE NO. 1149
PAGE 2 OF 5
“Chapter 10.04 STOP AND SPEED REGULATIONS
Section 10.04.010 Master plan of arterial highways.

Section 10.04.020 Through streets.

Section 10.04.030 Speed limits.

Section 10.04.035 Adjustment of speed limits.

Section 10.04.040 Other streets within the city.

Section 10.04.050 Speed limit on portion of Fulton Way.

Section 10.04.060 Truck routes.

Section 10.04.010 Master Plan of Arterial Highways.

The master plan of arterial highways, as adopted in the circulation element of the comprehensive general plan, consists of major, primary and secondary arterials as designated below:

A. Cerritos Avenue: West city limit to east city limit; B. Chapman Avenue: West city limit to east city limit;
C. Dale Street: South city limit to north city limit;
D. Katella Avenue: Knott Avenue to Magnolia Avenue;
E. Knott Avenue: South city limit to north city limit;
F. Lampson Avenue: West city limit to east city limit;
G. Orangewood Avenue: West city limit to east city limit; H. Magnolia Avenue: South city limit to north city limit; I. Western Avenue: South city limit to north city limit.

Section 10.04.020 Through Streets.

All traffic entering streets and highways designated as arterials on the master plan of arterial highways from local streets shall stop before proceeding except at signal controlled intersections.

Section 10.04.030 Speed Limits.

The City Council is authorized to adopt changes to the posted speed limits upon receiving an engineering & traffic survey, in accordance with the California manual on uniform traffic control devices and report from the City Engineer.

Section 10.04.035 Adjustment of Speed Limits.

The City Engineer shall review speed limits, make recommendations to the City Council every five (5) years, and update the speed survey as necessary.

Section 10.04.040 Other Streets Within the City.

No vehicle shall be operated on other streets within the city at a speed in excess of twenty-five miles per hour.

ORDINANCE NO. 1149
PAGE 3 OF 5
Section 10.04.050 Speed Limits.

Pursuant to the provisions of California Vehicle Code Section 22358.3, the prima facie speed limit on the following roadways are as follows:

Roadway Portion of Roadway Affected Declared Prima
Facie Speed Limit
(miles per hour)
Cerritos Avenue Knott Ave to Western Ave 40
Cerritos Avenue Western Ave to Beach Blvd. 40
Cerritos Avenue Beach Blvd. to Dale St. 40
Cerritos Avenue Dale St. to Magnolia St. 40
Cerritos Avenue Magnolia St. to Rodeo Dr. 40
Chapman Avenue Western Ave. to Beach Blvd. 40
Chapman Avenue Beach Blvd. To Dale St. 40
Chapman Avenue Dale St. to Magnolia Ave. 40
Dale Street Lola Ave. to Cerritos Ave 35
Dale Street Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Dale Street Katella Ave. to Orangewood Ave. 35
Dale Street Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave. 35
Dale Street Chapman Ave. to Barr Lane 35
Fern Avenue North City Limit to Cerritos Ave 25
Fern Avenue Cerritos Ave. to Pacific St. 25
Garden Grove
Boulevard
Beach Blvd. to Fern Ave. 40
Katella Avenue Knott Ave. to Western Ave. 45
Katella Avenue Western Ave. to Beach Blvd. 40
Katella Avenue Beach Blvd. to Dale St. 45
Katella Avenue Dale St. to Magnolia St. 45
Knott Avenue Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Knott Avenue Katella Ave. to Recycle Way 40
Lampson Avenue Western Ave. to Beach Blvd. 40
Lampson Avenue Beach Blvd. To Chateau 40
Magnolia Street Ball Rd. to Cerritos Ave. 40
Magnolia Street Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Orangewood Avenue Santa Rosalia to Beach Blvd. 35
Orangewood Avenue Beach Blvd. to Pine Tree Ln. 35
Orangewood Avenue Western Ave. to East End 25
Santa Rosalia Street Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave. 25 Santa Rosalia Street Chapman Ave. to Lampson Ave. 25
Syracuse Avenue Knott Ave. to Western St. 25
Village Center Drive Beach Blvd. to Garden Grove Blvd. 30 Western Avenue Palais Rd. to Cerritos Ave 40
Western Avenue Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Western Avenue Katella Ave. to Orangewood Ave. 40
Western Avenue Orangewood Ave. to Simmons Pl. 45
ORDINANCE NO. 1149
PAGE 4 OF 5
Section 10.04.060 Truck Routes.

A. A truck route is a street the city designated as such in this code where commercial vehicles having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating in excess of ten thousand pounds may be operated.

B. The following streets within the city are designated as truck routes:

1. Katella Avenue—West city limit to east city limit;

2. Beach Boulevard—South city limit to north city limit;

3. Garden Grove Boulevard—East city limit to west city limit;

4. Western Avenue—South city limit to Katella Avenue;

5. Knott Street—South city limit to Katella Avenue.

C. No person shall drive, operate or park, or cause to be driven, operated or parked, in the city any commercial vehicle having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating in excess of ten thousand pounds except on a designated truck route.” SECTION 3: The City Council directs the City of Stanton Public Works Department to implement the speed limit recommendations contained within this ordinance in compliance with regulations promulgated by the California Department of Transportation under Vehicle Code section 21400.

SECTION 4: The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance and the above findings have been based are located in the City Clerk’s Department, 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records.

SECTION 5: If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or applications of the ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this resolution are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this resolution irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its adoption.

SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Not later than fifteen (15) days following the passage of this Ordinance, the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, along with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance, shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Stanton.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 2024.

DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
ORDINANCE NO. 1149
PAGE 5 OF 5
ATTEST:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK

APPROVED AS TO FORM

HONGDAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF STANTON )
I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1149 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Stanton, California, held on the 27th day of August, 2024 and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 10th day of September, 2024, by the following roll-call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK

REDLINE OF ORDINANCE
Chapter 10.04 STOP AND SPEED REGULATIONS
§ 10.04.010 Master plan of arterial highways.
§ 10.04.020 Through streets.
§ 10.04.030 Speed limits.
§ 10.04.035 Adjustment of speed limits.
§ 10.04.040 Other streets within the city.
§ 10.04.050 Speed limit on portion of Fulton Way.roadways. § 10.04.060 Truck routes.
§ 10.04.010 Master Pplan of Aarterial Hhighways.

The master plan of arterial highways, as adopted in the circulation element of the comprehensive general plan, consists of major, primary and secondary arterials as designated below:

All traffic entering streets and highways designated as arterials on the master plan of arterial highways from local streets shall stop before proceeding except at signal controlled intersections.
§ 10.04.030 Speed Llimits.

A. The city manager is delegated the authority and directed to provide documents to city council to implement its policy to adjust speed limits as necessary.

B. The city manager is delegated authority to modify speed limits by the city council. Justification for speed limits shall comply with all statutes.

A. The city manager is delegated the authority and directed to provide documents to city council to implement its policy to adjust speed limits as necessary.

Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.

B. The city manager is delegated authority to modify speed limits by the city council.

Justification for speed limits shall comply with all statutes. § 10.04.035 Adjustment of Sspeed Llimits.

The city manager and cCity eEngineer shall review speed limits, make recommendations to the City Council every five (5) years, and update speed survey as necessary.
§ 10.04.040 Other Sstreets Wwithin the Ccity.

No vehicle shall be operated on other streets within the city at a speed in excess of twenty-five miles per hour.
§ 10.04.050 Speed limit on portion of Fulton Way.Limits on Roadways.

Pursuant to the provisions of California Vehicle Code Section 22358.3, the prima facie speed limit on Fulton Way between Rutledge Avenue and Lambert Way is declared to be fifteen miles per hour.the following roadways are as follows:

Roadway Portion of Roadway Affected Declared Prima
Facie Speed
Limit (miles per
hour)
Cerritos Avenue Knott Ave to Western Ave 40
Cerritos Avenue Western Ave to Beach Blvd. 40
Cerritos Avenue Beach Blvd. to Dale St. 40
Cerritos Avenue Dale St. to Magnolia St. 40
Cerritos Avenue Magnolia St. to Rodeo Dr. 40
Chapman Avenue Western Ave. to Beach Blvd. 40
Chapman Avenue Beach Blvd. To Dale St. 40
Chapman Avenue Dale St. to Magnolia Ave. 40
Dale Street Lola Ave. to Cerritos Ave 35
Dale Street Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Dale Street Katella Ave. to Orangewood Ave. 35
Dale Street Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave. 35
Dale Street Chapman Ave. to Barr Lane 35
Fern Avenue North City Limit to Cerritos Ave 25
Fern Avenue Cerritos Ave. to Pacific St. 25
Garden Grove
Boulevard
Beach Blvd. to Fern Ave. 40
Katella Avenue Knott Ave. to Western Ave. 45
Katella Avenue Western Ave. to Beach Blvd. 40
Katella Avenue Beach Blvd. to Dale St. 45
Katella Avenue Dale St. to Magnolia St. 45
Knott Avenue Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Knott Avenue Katella Ave. to Recycle Way 40
Lampson Avenue Western Ave. to Beach Blvd. 40
Lampson Avenue Beach Blvd. To Chateau 40
Magnolia Street Ball Rd. to Cerritos Ave. 40
Magnolia Street Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Orangewood Avenue Santa Rosalia to Beach Blvd. 35
Orangewood Avenue Beach Blvd. to Pine Tree Ln. 35
Orangewood Avenue Western Ave. to East End 25
Santa Rosalia Street Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave. 25 Santa Rosalia Street Chapman Ave. to Lampson Ave. 25
Syracuse Avenue Knott Ave. to Western St. 25
Village Center Drive Beach Blvd. to Garden Grove Blvd. 30 Western Avenue Palais Rd. to Cerritos Ave 40
Western Avenue Cerritos Ave. to Katella Ave. 40
Western Avenue Katella Ave. to Orangewood Ave. 40
Western Avenue Orangewood Ave. to Simmons Pl. 45
§ 10.04.060Truck Rroutes.

A. A truck route is a street the city designated as such in this code where commercial vehicles having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating in excess of ten thousand pounds may be operated.

B. The following streets within the city are designated as truck routes:

1. Katella Avenue—West city limit to east city limit;

2. Beach Boulevard—South city limit to north city limit;

3. Garden Grove Boulevard—East city limit to west city limit;

4. Western Avenue—South city limit to Katella Avenue;

5. Knott Street—South city limit to Katella Avenue.

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
FOR

SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF STANTON
MARCH 2024
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF STANTON
7800 KATELLA AVENUE
STANTON, CALIFORNIA 90680
PREPARED BY:

HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC.
17821 EAST 17TH STREET, SUITE 245
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680
(714) 731-9455
Attachment: C
Click here to return to the agenda.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ i Traffic Engineer's Certification ...................................................................................................... ii Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Speed Trap ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Basic Speed Law............................................................................................................................. 4 Prima Facie Speed Limits............................................................................................................... 4 Residence District ........................................................................................................................... 5 Establishment of Speed Zones........................................................................................................ 5 Data Collection Procedures............................................................................................................. 5 Speed Zoning Methodology............................................................................................................ 6 Speed Zone Survey ......................................................................................................................... 6 Local Street Exemptions................................................................................................................. 7 Other Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 7 Radar Collection Time-Frames....................................................................................................... 7 Analysis Factors.............................................................................................................................. 8 Field Review ................................................................................................................................... 9 Accident History ............................................................................................................................. 9 Results and Recommendations..................................................................................................... 10 Locations Established as " Residence District " .............................................................. 10 Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes".......................................................................... 10 Support Explanations for "No Speed Limit Changes "..................................................... 12 Locations of "New Speed Limit Posting" ......................................................................... 12 Support Explanations for "New Speed Limit Posting"..................................................... 12 Summary of Recommendations.....................................................................................................14 Appendix A - For Each Street Segment In The Survey
Data Summary Sheet..............................................................................................................

Radar Speed Distribution Sheet.............................................................................................

Survey Field Sheet .................................................................................................................

Appendix B – Certification
Radar Gun Certification.........................................................................................................

Technician Certification......................................................................................................... i

1 CITY OF STANTON

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS
Introduction
In accordance with procedures established by the State of California, this Engineering and Traffic Survey has been developed for the City of Stanton as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City. The work provided herein was authorized by the City and was performed by the engineering consulting firm of Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. The goal of the review was two-fold. The first was to review any new roadway segments to determine if speed limit postings should be recommended. The second involved a determination as to whether changes in pre-existing conditions have occurred where older speed limits should be modified.

The requirement to perform Engineering and Traffic surveys for speed limits is based on the California Vehicle Code (CVC). CVC Section 40802 states that at least once every seven (7), or fourteen (14) years, States and local agencies should re-evaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways. Recent changes to the CA MUTCD changed the policy and procedure for setting speed limits in California. Engineering and Traffic Surveys must be performed with the use of radar or other approved electronic devices if the use of radar is to be employed to enforce speed limits. If such a survey is not performed within seven years, or fourteen years as stated previously of the date of the preceding survey, then the new data and its use will constitute a "speed trap" (see page 2). Hence, evidence using such would not be admissible in court.

The definition of a Traffic and Engineering Survey is contained in Section 627 of the Vehicle Code and is as follows:

Engineering and Traffic survey, as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by State and local authorities. An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of the following:
(a) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (b) Accident records.
(c) Highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The California Vehicle code has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general understanding of the "Basic Speed Law", "Prima Facie Speed Limits" and "Intermediate Speed Zones".

The California Vehicle code has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be 2 based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general understanding of a "Speed Trap", "Basic Speed Law", "Prima Facie Speed Limits" and "Intermediate Speed Zones".

Speed Trap (CVC 40802)
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.
(b) (1) For the purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the “California Road Systems Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, "school zone" means that area approaching a passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, "senior zone" means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SENIOR" warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, "business activity district" means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 mile per hour or 20 3 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear; the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the know distance. (B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Expect as specified in subclause (II), seven years. 4 (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 406, Sec. 5. (AB 1938) Effective January 1, 2023) Basic Speed Law (CVC 22350)
All fifty states base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California, CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as:
"No Person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time-to-time and place-to-place and, therefore, no set of fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist will constantly adjust their driving behavior to fit the conditions encountered, and must learn to do this with a minimum of assistance from the police. The Basic Speed Law is founded on the belief that a majority of motorists are able to modify their driving behavior properly, as long as they are aware of the conditions around them.

Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352)
All other speed limits are prima facie limits which, "on the face of it", are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. The posted speed limit recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic, weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times.

Certain prima facie limits are automatically established by law (CVC 22352), including a 15 mph limit in alleys, blind intersections, blind railroad crossing, and the 25 mph limit in business and residence districts. There is also a part time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are present in route to or from school. There is also a 25 mph limit when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign.

Business and residence districts are defined in the Vehicle Code as specific areas meeting a specified minimum density of roadside development. CVC Sections 235 and 515 define these regulations. A count of houses or active businesses facing on a highway must be made to determine whether or not a valid business or residence district exists. The law does not require posting these prima facie limits that are readily apparent. 5 Residence District (CVC 515)
A "residence district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Establishment of Speed Zones
The reason that speed limit areas and their required postings are done is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers.

As with other similar laws, the limits identified are based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reasonable and safe. It is this type of information that is reflected in the analysis section of this report. Namely, posted speed limits are a reflection of that speed which most people deem to be safe as opposed to a minority of drivers who do not drive in a reasonable manner.

Speed zones are also established to advise of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For that reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which considers the analytical data and accident history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit.

Data Collection Procedures
Speed evaluation data was collected at 37 different speed survey segments on 14 different roadways in the City of Stanton. These streets and the number of segments on each are described as follows:

1. Cerritos Avenue (5) 8. Lampson Avenue (2)

2. Chapman Avenue (3) 9. Magnolia Street (2)

3. Dale Street (5) 10. Orangewood Avenue (3)

4. Fern Avenue (2) 11. Santa Rosalia Street (2-Exempt)

5. Garden Grove Boulevard (1) 12. Syracuse Avenue (1-Exempt)

6. Katella Avenue (4) 13. Village Center Drive (1)

7. Knott Avenue (2) 14. Western Avenue (4)
As described in various traffic engineering documents - including information provided by the State of California, the individual locations on which radar data collection procedures were used involved considerations for the following:
b. Stop sign or traffic signal locations;
c. Visibility issues;
d. Traffic flow at intersections, cross-traffic, major driveways, crosswalks, railroad crossings and unusual turning movements;
6 e. The influence of other traffic factors on the speed of cars: such as on street parking, roadway features, adjacent land uses, and lighting.

Speed Zoning Methodology
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA. MUTCD) specifies a “short method of determining speed limits on City and County through Highways, Arterial and Collector Roads Procedures.

Introduction - This short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that the reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorist’s speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include, but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, super-elevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.

Speed Zone Survey
- Only one person is required for the fieldwork. Speeds can be read directly from a radar speed meter.
- A section of road should be selected with representative operating speeds. If speeds vary on a given road, additional surveys should be conducted. In this case, it may be necessary to establish additional speed zones with different speed limits. The section selected should be straight and should have no traffic signal, stop sign or intersection with a major cross street. - Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours on weekdays. The weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is important that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous as not to affect traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, with the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed so as to be able to survey traffic in both directions, and should not make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway centerline.
- The survey should have a minimum sample of 100 automobiles in each survey. This may result in excessive survey periods for low-volume roads. Under these conditions, the survey should be conducted for a minimum of two hours, but in no case should the sample for any survey contain less than 50 automobiles.
- The California MUTCD states that speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed can be selected directly from the data sheet. However, roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist or other roadway conditions that may impact sight distance may result in a further reduction of 5 mph in the recommended speed limit. - As a check on the validity of the proposed speed limit, an analysis should be made of the twoyear accident record for the section of roadway under consideration. If this record shows an abnormally high percentage of accidents normally associated with excessive speeds, the 7 proposed speed limit should be further reduced. This is a judgment situation, and will not usually be a factor,
- Short speed zones of less than half a mile should be avoided, except in transition areas. - Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadway development.
- Speed zoning in 5 mile per hour increments should be avoided if possible. A 10-mile per hour increment is preferable.
- Speed zoning should be coordinated between adjacent jurisdictions.

Local Street Exemptions (CVC 40802)
Many streets are designated as "Local" streets per CVC 40802. These streets are exempt from the radar study. Therefore, the speed limit for these streets does not require an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The code is as follows:
"For the purpose of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest California Road System Maps as approved by the Federal Highway Administration. When these streets do not appear on the California Road System Maps, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions:

1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

2. Not more than one half mile of uninterrupted length.

3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

Other Considerations
Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices, roadway alignment, width surface conditions, accident history and any unique traffic hazards that may exist. Any of these conditions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning.

Radar Collection Time Frames
The hours of radar operation were restricted to off-peak periods for heavily traveled streets and to uncongested peak periods on lightly traveled streets. All surveys were conducted in fair weather.

The radar unit was mounted at the top of the front dash of an unmarked vehicle with the meterreading unit sustained inside the vehicle. The radar unit's calibration was checked periodically using a tuning fork.
8 The radar operator and assistant recorded the speed meter readings for each location on Radar Speed Survey Field Sheets included in the appendix of this report. A representative sampling of at least 50 vehicles were surveyed in each direction or a cumulative sample of 100 vehicles for both directions where possible. On low volume roads, where a total sample of 100 vehicles would result in an excessive time period, sampling was continued until a representative bellshaped frequency distribution was attained.

Analysis Factors
Several factors were used as input to our recommendations for speed limits. These include the 85th Percentile, the 10 MPH Pace and others. These are described in detail below.

1. The CRITICAL SPEED, or the 85th percentile is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. From experience, traffic engineers have found that this is one of the most reliable factors in determining appropriate speed limits.

Hence, the accepted practice, and one that has been used in this case is to set the speed limit at or near the critical speed. This recognizes that other factors could be present where the above may not be appropriate. When this procedure is used, it not only conforms to that required by the State but it also provides a strong base for law enforcement personnel to properly enforce speed limits.

2. The 10 MPH PACE is that continuous 10 mph incremental range of speeds in which the largest number of recorded vehicles is contained. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. For this element, the accepted practice to the greatest extent possible is to try and keep the recommended speed limit within the 10 mph pace after considering the critical speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the critical speed.

3. The MEDIAN (MIDDLE) SPEED, or 50th percentile speed, represents the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50% of the vehicles travel faster, and 50% travel slower than the median speeds. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution.

4. The 15th PERCENTILE SPEED is that speed at or below which 15% of the vehicles are traveling. This value is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the vehicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the accident potential.

5. MODAL SPEED: The modal speed is the speed, which occurs most frequently in the distribution (the most). It serves as another useful measure in verifying the correct recommendation for speed limits.

6. STANDARD DEVIATION: This is a mathematical element, which relates to measures of dispersion of data. It is used to assist in describing the center of speed distribution information around the arithmetic mean or the time mean speed. It also is used in the 9 overall review of recommended speed limits and serves to verify the level of confidence of data used in making recommendations.

7. The MEAN (AVERAGE) is the sum of the speeds of the samples divided by the number of samples.

The numerical values of the above factors are derived from the speed distribution curves calculated for each survey location. These distribution curves represent a method of graphic analysis that compares the cumulative percentage of vehicles to the speed at which the vehicles are traveling.

Field Review
In addition to the availability of the above statistical data, a significant aspect of speed limit recommendations is based on the field review. Its importance is that existing conditions may warrant a lower speed than is actually indicated by the application of survey data. Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed limits are listed below:

1. Segment length, width and alignment

2. Level of pedestrian activity

3. Traffic flow characteristics

4. Vertical and/or horizontal curves.

5. Driver sight distance constraints.

6. Adjacent residential/commercial/industrial etc. zoning.

7. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors

8. Frequency of intersections, driveways and on street parking;

9. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices;

10. Roadway conditions, bumps and dips;

11. Obstructions to pedestrian visibility;

12. Land use and proximity of schools;

13. Uniformity with existing speed zones to/with adjacent jurisdictions;

14. Any other unusual conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The results of the field review of related road/traffic variables are summarized on the Engineering and Traffic Survey forms found in the Appendix of this report.

Accident History
The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available two-year accident information for the subject streets. The accident information includes the total number of accidents within each street segment and of those accidents, the number that are speed-related.

This information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the City of Stanton.

The annual accident rate figures represent the number of speed-related accidents divided by years of accident records. The evaluation of accidents is useful as a check on the accuracy of 10 recommended or existing speed limits. Should this review show a high percentage of accidents associated with excessive speeds, consideration based on professional traffic engineering judgment should be directed toward reducing the posted or recommended speed limit.

Results and Recommendations
The following Summaries: Residence District CVC 515, No Speed Limit Changes, New Speed Limit Postings, and Summary of Recommendations show the results of the radar survey for the selected 37 locations. As shown, the Summary of Recommendations chart presents the necessary analysis elements that in addition to the field review of a registered traffic engineer led to the recommendations indicated.

Locations of “Residence District”
In the 2019 City Wide Engineering & Traffic Study, three roadway segments were established under the California Vehicle Code 515, “Resident District Speed Limit.” Explanations and requirements for Resident District are on Page 5. The CVC states that prima facie roadways are not required to be posted. Therefore, the City may choose to remove existing speed signs or leave them alone. These roadway segments are listed below and are exempt from speed studies:

Santa Rosalia Street
Orangewood Ave to Chapman Ave Establish as Residence District– 25 mph Chapman Ave to Lampson Ave Establish as Residence District– 25 mph Syracuse Avenue
Knott Ave to Western St Establish as Residence District– 25 mph Locations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The Summary indicates that 32 of the 37 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes. The reason centers mostly on the fact that the newly measured values of the 85th percentile and the 10 MPH pace are still within the parameters of the existing speed limits.

Additional factors such as the presence of horizontal or vertical curves reducing sight distance form the basis in some instances of our recommendation. Therefore, the current postings should remain as is. At six of these locations, only one direction of travel is posted and is listed for no change in the speed limit. Hence, the other direction should be posted for consistency. These segments noted as “install”, as well as the segments recommended for “No Change” are listed below:

Cerritos Avenue
Knott Ave to Western Ave Remain posted at 40 mph
Western Ave to Beach Bl Remain posted at 40 mph
Beach Bl to Dale St Remain posted at 40 mph
Dale St to Magnolia St Remain posted at 40 mph
Magnolia St to Rodeo Dr (ECL) Remain posted at 40 mph, Install WB Chapman Avenue
Western Ave to Beach Bl Remain posted at 40 mph
11 Beach Bl to Dale St Remain posted at 40 mph, Install EB Dale St to Magnolia Ave Remain posted at 40 mph
Dale Street
Lola Ave (NCL) to Cerritos Ave Remain posted at 35 mph
Cerritos Ave to Katella Ave Remain posted at 40 mph
Katella Ave to Orangewood Ave Remain posted at 35 mph
Orangewood Ave to Chapman Ave Remain posted at 35 mph
Fern Avenue
North City Limit to Cerritos Ave Remain posted at 25 mph Cerritos Ave to Pacific St Remain posted at 25 mph, Install NB Garden Grove Boulevard
Beach Bl to Fern Ave (ECL) Remain posted at 40 mph
Katella Avenue
Knott Ave to Western Ave Remain posted at 45 mph
Western Ave to Beach Bl Remain posted at 40 mph
Beach Bl to Dale St Remain posted at 45 mph
Dale St to Magnolia St Remain posted at 45 mph
Knott Avenue
Cerritos Ave to Katella Ave Remain posted at 40 mph
Katella Ave to Recycle Way (SCL) Remain posted at 40 mph, Install SB Lampson Avenue
Western Ave to Beach Bl Remain posted at 40 mph
Beach Bl to Chateau (ECL) Remain posted at 40 mph
Magnolia Street
Ball Rd to Cerritos Ave Remain posted at 40 mph
Cerritos Ave to Katella Ave (SCL) Remain posted at 40 mph Orangewood Avenue
Santa Rosalia to Beach Bl Remain posted at 35 mph
Beach Bl to Pine Tree Ln (ECL) Remain posted at 35 mph
Village Center Drive
Beach Bl to Garden Grove Bl Remain posted at 30 mph, Install SB Western Avenue
Palais Rd (NCL) to Cerritos Ave Remain posted at 40 mph Cerritos Ave to Katella Ave Remain posted at 40 mph
Katella Ave to Orangewood Ave Remain posted at 40 mph
Orangewood Ave to Simmons Pl (SCL) Remain posted at 45 mph, Install NB 12 Support Explanations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The following are support explanations for roadway segments that the recommended speed limit is 5 mph or more lower than the newly measured 85th percentile speed or require the City’s attention such as installing a speed limit sign where one direction may be missing.

Dale Street
Lola Avenue (NCL) to Cerritos Avenue
This section of Dale Street is a four lane roadway. It has a 35 mph speed limit posting southbound only. Adjacent land uses are heavy residential fronting and non-fronting, STEM Academy and commercial at Cerritos Avenue. With the STEM Academy and nearby Dale Junior High School moderate pedestrian and bicycle activity was noticed in the area. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 43.3 mph and a 10 mph pace range from 33 to 42 mph. In consideration of the safety of the school age pedestrian traffic and bicyclists in the area, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Locations of "New Speed Limit Postings"
Two of the thirty-seven roadway segments are currently un-posted. Again, the newly measured values of the 85th percentile speeds, the 10 mph pace range, and the 50th percentile speeds were factors used to make these recommendations. It is noted that for each case, the recommendation to post is necessary to enhance the enforcement of the recommended safe speed limit. This segment is shown in the Summary of Recommendations beginning on page 14 and is listed follows:

Dale Street
Chapman Ave to Barr Lane Install New Posting of 35 mph
Orangewood Avenue
Western Ave to East End Install New Posting of 25 mph
Support Explanations of "New Speed Limit Postings"
Dale Street
Chapman Avenue to Barr Lane
This section of Dale Street is a two lane roadway. Currently, within the segment there is not a posted speed limit. A 35 mph speed limit and a 25 mph when children present signs are posted south of Barr Lane (out of the city limits). Field notes state that there are school crosswalks at Chapman Avenue, Lampson Avenue and Enault Street. With the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 38.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph, it is recommended that 35 mph speed signs be installed for this area.
13 Orangewood Avenue
Western Avenue to East End
This section of Orangewood Avenue is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses include multi-family residential, commercial at Western Avenue, and business-industrial complexes.

Currently, there is not a speed limit posted for this 0.12 section. With the results of the speed survey showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.2, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this roadway.
14 CITY OF STANTON
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 2024

STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

CERRITOS AVENUE
1 KNOTT AVE TO
WESTERN AVE 40 40 43.6 38.7 35-44 71.5 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 2 WESTERN AVE TO
BEACH BL 40 40 42.9 39.5 34-43 80.7 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 3 BEACH BL TO
DALE ST 40 /*25 40 44.0 37.8 33-42 68.8 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 4 DALE ST TO
MAGNOLIA ST 40 /35(1)
40 42.5 38.3 33-42 74.8 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE
5 MAGNOLIA ST TO
RODEO DR (ECL) 40 EB 40 43.2 39.2 35-44 73.6 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE – POST WB

CHAPMAN AVENUE
6 WESTERN AVE TO
BEACH BL 40 / 25* 40 44.1 39.3 35-44 75.0 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 7 BEACH BL TO
DALE ST 40 WB/*25 40 38.6 34.6 30-39 81.8 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE / POST EB 8 DALE ST TO
MAGNOLIA AVE 40 /*25 40 44.2 39.8 36-45 80.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

DALE STREET
9 LOLA AVE (NCL) TO
CERRITOS AVE 35 /*25 35 43.3 37.4 35-42 72.2 NO CHANGE – HEAVY SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS 10 CERRITOS AVE TO
KATELLA AVE 40 /*25 40 44.0 39.4 36-45 78.9 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 11 KATELLA AVE TO
ORANGEWOOD AVE 40 /*25 40 43.8 39.2 35-44 80.3 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 12 ORANGEWOOD AVE TO
CHAPMAN AVE 35 35 39.9 35.0 30-39 74.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 13 CHAPMAN AVE TO
BARR LANE NP 35 38.6 33.9 29-38 76.5 POST 35 MPH - 85TH PERCENTILE (1) = 25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT (City of Anaheim) WB = WESTBOUND (1) = 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT (City of Anaheim) EB = EASTBOUND NP = NOT POSTED
15 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

FERN AVENUE
14 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
CERRITOS AVE 25 25 27.9 23.9 19-28 82.2 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 15 CERRITOS AVE TO
PACIFIC 25 SB 25 27.8 24.3 20-29 82.1 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE / POST NB

GARDEN GROVE BOULEVARD
16 BEACH BL TO
FERN AVE (ECL) 40 40 42.9 39.5 36-45 91.3 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE

KATELLA AVENUE
17 KNOTT AVE TO
WESTERN AVE 45 45 48.0 43.5 39-48 65.4 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 18 WESTERN AVE TO
BEACH BL 40 40 42.4 37.0 33-42 76.7 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 19 BEACH BL TO
DALE ST 45 45 46.1 41.6 39-48 70.6 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 20 DALE ST TO
MAGNOLIA ST 45 45 47.1 41.6 39-48 73.0 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE

KNOTT AVENUE
21 CERRITOS AVE TO
KATELLA AVE 40 40 44.0 36-44 36-45 73.3 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 22 KATELLA AVE TO
RECYCLE WAY (SCL) 40 NB 40 42.0 36.8 33-42 69.4 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE / POST SB

LAMPSON AVENUE
23 WESTERN AVE TO
BEACH BL 40 40 43.9 39.6 36-45 79.3 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 24 BEACH BL TO
CHATEAU (ECL) 40 40 41.9 37.0 34-43 77.4 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
NB = NORTHBOUND SB = SOUTHBOUND NP = NOT POSTED
16 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

MAGNOLIA STREET
25 BALL RD TO
CERRITOS AVE 40 40 43.6 39.6 36-45 82.7 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 26 CERRITOS AVE TO
KATELLA AVE (SCL) 40 /*25 40 42.1 38.8 35-44 87.2 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE
27 WESTERN AVE TO
EAST END NP 25 27.2 22.9 18-27 79.1 POST 25 MPH – 85TH PERCENTILE 28 SANTA ROSALIA TO
BEACH BL 35 35 37.7 33.9 31-40 83.3 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 29 BEACH BL TO
PINE TREE LN (ECL) 35 35 39.9 35.3 32-41 73.5 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE

SANTA ROSALIA STREET
30 ORANGEWOOD AVE TO
CHAPMAN AVE 25 25 29.8 26.1 22-31 81.9
2019, ESTABLISHED AS RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
*** EXEMPT FROM SPEED STUDY ***
31 CHAPMAN AVE TO
LAMPSON AVE 25 25 30.8 26.9 23-32 82.5
2019, ESTABLISH AS RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
*** EXMEPT FROM SPEED STUDY ***

SYRACUSE AVENUE
32 KNOTT AVE TO
WESTERN ST 25 WB 25 29.2 25.4 21-30 85.9
2019, ESTABLISH AS RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
*** EXEMPT FROM SPEED STUDY***

VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE
33 BEACH BL TO
GARDEN GROVE BL 30 NB 30 33.3 29.5 26-35 87.1 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE – POST SB Note: *** EXEMPT FROM FUTURE SPEED STUDIES ***
*25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE,
NB = NORTHBOUND, SB = SOUTHBOUND WB = WESTBOUND
17 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

WESTERN AVENUE
34 PALAIS RD (NCL) TO
CERRITOS AVE 40 40 43.6 38.5 35-44 73.8 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 35 CERRITOS AVE TO
KATELLA AVE 40 40 40.1 36.4 32-41 79.6 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 36 KATELLA AVE TO
ORANGEWOOD AVE 40 40 44.7 39.9 36-45 79.7 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE 37 ORANGEWOOD AVE TO
SIMMONS PL (SCL) 45 SB 45 46.5 42.8 38-47 78.7 NO CHANGE - 85TH PERCENTILE – POST NB *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
NB = NORTHBOUND SB = SOUTHBOUND

APPENDIX A

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF BELL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 7
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.16 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - KNOTT / WESTERN

CROSSWALKS AT KNOTT / WESTERN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL (EB) - NO (WB)

OTHER ENTIRE SECTION WB RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (single + multi-family) / CHURCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Cerritos 2024-01
The recommended 40 mph is 3.6 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 43.6 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.50 17,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 98.3%
X X X X 4 2.2% 97.2%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 95.0%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 92.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 87.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.3% 81.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 74.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.4% 67.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 59.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.1% 53.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 43.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.8% 38.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 30.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.8% 23.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 15.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 11.2%
0 0.0% 6.7%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 6.7%
30 X X X 3 1.7% 3.9%
X X X 3 1.7% 2.2%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 179
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.6 %
FILE: Cerritos 2024-01

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:20 AM - 11:55 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 98.3%
47 X 97.2%
46 X 95.0%
45 X 92.2%
44 X 87.2% }PACE
43 X 81.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 74.3% }PACE
41 X 67.6% }PACE
40 X 59.2% }PACE
39 X 53.1% }PACE
38 X 43.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 38.0% }PACE
36 X 30.2% }PACE
35 X 23.5% }PACE
34 X 15.6%
33 X 11.2% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 6.7%
31 X 6.7%
30 X 3.9%
29 X 2.2%
28 X 0.6%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.6 %
File; Cerritos 2024-01
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF HUNTER WAY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 8
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.32 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - WESTERN / BEACH

CROSSWALKS AT WESTERN / BEACH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB (EB+WB) / NO PARKING 8am-11am WED

ENTIRE SEGMENT RED CURB (WB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE w/LEFTS
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (multi-family-NF) / COMMERCIAL (at Western + Beach) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Cerritos 2024-02
The recommended 40 mph is 2.9 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 42.9 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.50 16,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X X X 3 1.8% 98.8%
X X X X 4 2.3% 97.1%
X X X X 4 2.3% 94.7%
45 X X X X X X X 7 4.1% 92.4%
X X X X 4 2.3% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.0% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 13.5% 78.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 12.3% 65.5% 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.0% 53.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 46.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.1% 41.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.5% 37.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.5% 26.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.6% 16.4%
X X X X X X 6 3.5% 8.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.1% 5.3%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 171
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.3 %
FILE: Cerritos 2024-02

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.4%
48 X 98.8%
47 X 97.1%
46 X 94.7%
45 X 92.4%
44 X 88.3%
43 X 86.0% }PACE
42 X 78.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 65.5% }PACE
40 X 53.2% }PACE
39 X 46.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 41.5% }PACE
37 X 37.4% }PACE
36 X 26.9% }PACE
35 X 16.4% }PACE
34 X 8.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
33 X 5.3%
32 X 1.2%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.3 %
File; Cerritos 2024-02
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FERN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH / DALE
CROSSWALKS AT BEACH / DALE (sch)
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES (Heavy Peds at School)

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (WB) - NO STOPPING ANYTIME (EB+WB)

OTHER NO SHOULDERS (EB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (multi-family) / COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
* 25 mph When Children Present, School Zone File: Cerritos 2024-03 The recommended 40 mph is 4.0 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 41.9 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.49 15,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.2% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 97.1%
X X X X 4 2.9% 96.4%
X X X 3 2.2% 93.5%
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 91.3%
X X 2 1.4% 84.8%
X X X 3 2.2% 83.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.9% 81.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 70.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.1% 65.9%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 55.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.0% 51.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.0% 43.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.7% 35.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.4% 26.8%
X X X 3 2.2% 17.4%
X X X X 4 2.9% 15.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 12.3%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 8.0%
30 X X X X X 5 3.6% 4.3%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 138
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.3 %
FILE: Cerritos 2024-03

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.3%
48 X 97.1%
47 X 96.4%
46 X 93.5%
45 X 91.3%
44 X 84.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
43 X 83.3%
42 X 81.2% }PACE
41 X 70.3% }PACE
40 X 65.9% }PACE
39 X 55.8% }PACE
38 X 51.4% }PACE
37 X 43.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 35.5% }PACE
35 X 26.8% }PACE
34 X 17.4% }PACE
33 X 15.2% }PACE
32 X 12.3% - - - - - -15PCT
31 X 8.0%
30 X 4.3%
29 X 0.7%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.3 %
File; Cerritos 2024-03
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE DALE ST TO MAGNOLIA ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SHERRILL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH
35 MPH / *25 (Posted in City of Anaheim)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 4
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DALE / MAGNOLIA
CROSSWALKS AT DALE (sch) / MAGNOLIA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING YES (Heavy)

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING THURS 8am-11am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (WB) - YES / FEW (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
SHERRILL TO MAGNOLIA-WB (City of Anaheim)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / COMMERCIAL (at Dale + Magnolia) / PARK / SCE RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NOTE: 35 MPH and *25 MPH School Zone POSTED SHERRILL TO MAGNOLIA (In City of Anaheim) File: Cerritos 2024-04 F = FRONTING
This section of Cerritos Avenue is a four lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential, commercial at Dale St and Magnolia Ave, pre-school day care, and SCE substation. This section shares jurisdiction with the City of Anaheim between Sherrill to Magnolia Street. The posted speed limit is 40 mph and in the City of Anaheim section a 35 mph speed sign is posted in the westbound direction. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 42.5 mph and an median speed of 38.3 mph. With that, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit remain.

0.50 14,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE DALE ST TO MAGNOLIA ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X X X 3 1.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X 2 1.3% 96.9%
45 X X X X X X 6 3.8% 95.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 91.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 87.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 75.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 67.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.7% 57.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 47.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2% 42.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 34.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 27.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 20.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 15.7%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 8.2%
X X 2 1.3% 5.0%
30 X X X 3 1.9% 3.8%
X 1 0.6% 1.9%
0 0.0% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
0 0.0% 0.6%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.2 %
File: Cerritos 2024-04

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE DALE ST TO MAGNOLIA ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 98.1%
46 X 96.9%
45 X 95.6%
44 X 91.8%
43 X 87.4%
42 X 83.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 75.5% }PACE
40 X 67.3% }PACE
39 X 57.9% }PACE
38 X 47.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 42.1% }PACE
36 X 34.0% }PACE
35 X 27.0% }PACE
34 X 20.8% }PACE
33 X 15.7% }PACE
32 X 8.2% - - - - - -15PCT
31 X 5.0%
30 X 3.8%
29 X 1.9%
28 X 1.3%
27 X 1.3%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.2 %
File; Cerritos 2024-04
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE MAGNOLIA ST TO RODEO DR (ECL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:10 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF RODEO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH EB

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 4
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.44 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MAGNOLIA

CROSSWALKS AT MAGNOLIA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING YES (Heavy)
OTHER NO PARKING THURS 8am-11am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (single+multi family) / COMMERCIAL (at Magnolia) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Cerritos 2019-05
The recommended 40 mph is 3.2 mph below the newlyn measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standard.

0.22 14,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE MAGNOLIA ST TO RODEO DR (ECL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:10 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 98.6%
X X X X 4 2.8% 97.9%
X X X X 4 2.8% 95.1%
45 X X X X X 5 3.5% 92.4%
X X X X X X X 7 4.9% 88.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.9% 84.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.7% 79.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0% 69.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 12.5% 60.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.6% 47.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3% 42.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.7% 36.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.2% 26.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 22.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.9% 15.3%
X X X 3 2.1% 10.4%
X X X X 4 2.8% 8.3%
X X X 3 2.1% 5.6%
30 X X X 3 2.1% 3.5%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
0 0.0% 0.7%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 144
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.3 %
File; Cerritos 2019-05

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CERRITOS AVENUE MAGNOLIA ST TO RODEO DR (ECL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:10 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 98.6%
47 X 97.9%
46 X 95.1%
45 X 92.4%
44 X 88.9% }PACE
43 X 84.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 79.2% }PACE
41 X 69.4% }PACE
40 X 60.4% }PACE
39 X 47.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 42.4% }PACE
37 X 36.1% }PACE
36 X 26.4% }PACE
35 X 22.2% }PACE
34 X 15.3%
33 X 10.4% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 8.3%
31 X 5.6%
30 X 3.5%
29 X 1.4%
28 X 0.7%
27 X 0.7%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.3 %
File; Cerritos 2019-05
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SANTA ROSALIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 3
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION ( 3 LANES EB 500' Approaching Beach)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - WESTERN / BEACH / SCHOOL

CROSSWALKS AT WESTERN / BEACH / SCHOOL XING

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL - AREAS OF NO STOPPING ANYTIME (WB)

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

AREAS OF RED CURB

NO PARKING ANYTIME / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (EB) - YES / YES (WB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (some) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (at Beach + Western) / ELEM SCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
*25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone File: Chapman 2024-06 The recommended 40 mph is 4.1 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 44.1 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.48 21,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 100.0%
50 X X X X X 5 2.5% 99.0%
X X X 3 1.5% 96.6%
X 1 0.5% 95.1%
X X X X 4 2.0% 94.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 3.9% 92.6%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 3.9% 88.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.9% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.3% 79.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.8% 71.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.9% 63.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.8% 56.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 8.8% 47.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.3% 38.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.8% 29.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.9% 22.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.4% 16.2%
X X X X X X 6 2.9% 9.8%
X X X X X 5 2.5% 6.9%
X X X X X 5 2.5% 4.4%
X X X 3 1.5% 2.0%
30 X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 204
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
File: Chapman 2024-06

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:10 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 99.0%
49 X 96.6%
48 X 95.1%
47 X 94.6%
46 X 92.6%
45 X 88.7%
44 X 84.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
43 X 79.9% }PACE
42 X 71.6% }PACE
41 X 63.7% }PACE
40 X 56.9% }PACE
39 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 38.2% }PACE
37 X 29.9% }PACE
36 X 22.1% }PACE
35 X 16.2% }PACE
34 X 9.8% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 6.9%
32 X 4.4%
31 X 2.0%
30 X 0.5%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 75.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
File; Chapman 2024-06
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF BEACH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH (WB) / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 11
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.25 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (WB) / 2-3 LANES (EB) (3 Lanes 400' e/o Beach)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH / POLY CARP SCH / NEARING / DALE CROSSWALKS AT BEACH / POLY CARP (sch) / NEARING / DALE (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES (EB) - NO STOPPING ANYTIME (WB)

OTHER NO SHOULDERS (WB) / BUS STOPS

NO PARKING WED STREET SWEEPING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL / ST POLY CARP SCHOOL-CHURCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
*25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone File: Chapman 2024-07 (NF) = Non-Fronting NOTE: ECL is 530 ft e/o Dale
This section of Chapman Avenue has 2-3 lanes per direction. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. The adjacent land uses are residential (non-fronting), commercial, and St Poly Carp School. Field observations include signals at Beach Bl, school, Nearing, and Dale Ave, no shoulders and no parking anytime westbound, and bus stops. The speed data results show an 85th percentile speed of 38.6 mph and a median speed of 30 tp 39 mph. With that and for consistency, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.

0.50 21,950

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
312/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE AVE
DATE: 312/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
45 X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X 3 1.7% 97.7%
X X 2 1.1% 96.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 94.9%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 93.2%
40 X X X X X 5 2.8% 90.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 87.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.5% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 72.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.2% 64.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.4% 54.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 43.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 35.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 27.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.8% 18.2%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 11.4%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 5.7%
X X X X 4 2.3% 2.3%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 176
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.7 %
File Chapman 2024-07

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE AVE
DATE: 312/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 98.9%
44 X 97.7%
43 X 96.0%
42 X 94.9%
41 X 93.2%
40 X 90.3%
39 X 87.5% }PACE
38 X 81.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
37 X 72.7% }PACE
36 X 64.8% }PACE
35 X 54.5% }PACE
34 X 43.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 35.2% }PACE
32 X 27.3% }PACE
31 X 18.2% }PACE
30 X 11.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
29 X 5.7%
28 X 2.3%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.7 %
File; Chapman 2024-07
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE DALE AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:50 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF DALE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 1
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DALE / MAGNOLIA
CROSSWALKS AT DALE (sch) / MAGNOLIA (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING (Wed-wb & Friday eb) STREET SWEEPING

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER BUS STOPS
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
*25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone File: Chapman 2024-08 (NF) = Non-Fronting NOTE: ECL is 530 ft e/o Dale
The recommended 40 mph is 4.2 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.50 21,950

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE DALE AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:50 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
50 X X X X X 5 2.6% 99.5%
X X X 3 1.5% 96.9%
X X X X 4 2.0% 95.4%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 93.4%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 90.8%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.1% 84.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 78.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.7% 70.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.2% 61.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 11.7% 52.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.2% 40.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.2% 30.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.1% 20.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 13.3%
35 X X X X X X 6 3.1% 7.7%
X X X 3 1.5% 4.6%
X X X 3 1.5% 3.1%
X X 2 1.0% 1.5%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 196
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.7 %
File: Chapman 2024-08

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

CHAPMAN AVENUE DALE AVE TO MAGNOLIA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:20 PM - 1:50 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 99.5%
49 X 96.9%
48 X 95.4%
47 X 93.4%
46 X 90.8%
45 X 88.3% }PACE
44 X 84.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
43 X 78.1% }PACE
42 X 70.4% }PACE
41 X 61.7% }PACE
40 X 52.6% }PACE
39 X 40.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 30.6% }PACE
37 X 20.4% }PACE
36 X 13.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 7.7%
34 X 4.6%
33 X 3.1%
32 X 1.5%
31 X 0.5%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.7 %
File; Chapman 2024-08
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET LOLA AVE (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF LOLA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 72.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH SB / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 8
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.29 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CHANTICLEER / CERRITOS
CROSSWALKS AT CHANTICLEER (sch) / CERRITOS (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER NO PARKING THURS 9am-12pm

NO PARKING OVERSIZED VEHICLES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLANE

AREAS OF RED CURB
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F-NF heavy) / ELEM SCHOOL / COMMERCIAL (at Cerritos) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST NORTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:
*25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone File: Dale 2024-09 F-NF = FRONTING, NON-FRONTING
This section of Dale Street is a four lane roadway. It has a 35 mph speed limit posting southbound only. Adjacent land uses are heavy residential fronting and non-fronting, STEM Academy and commercial at Cerritos Avenue.

With the STEM Academy and nearby Dale Junior High School moderate pedestrian and bicycle activity was noticed in the area. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 43.3 mph and a 10 mph pace range from 33 to 42 mph. In consideration of the safety of the school age pedestrian traffic and bicyclists in the area, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

0.37 12,850

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET LOLA AVE (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X X X X 4 2.3% 100.0%
X X X X 4 2.3% 97.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.5% 95.5%
45 X X X X X X X 7 4.0% 90.9%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 86.9%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 84.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.1% 75.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 69.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.5% 64.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 55.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.5% 46.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.8% 38.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.5% 31.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.8% 22.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.8% 15.9%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 9.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 6.3%
30 X X X X 4 2.3% 2.8%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 176
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.1 %
File: Dale 2024-09

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET LOLA AVE (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:05 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 97.7%
46 X 95.5%
45 X 90.9%
44 X 86.9%
43 X 84.1% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 81.3% }PACE
41 X 75.0% }PACE
40 X 69.9% }PACE
39 X 64.2% }PACE
38 X 55.7% }PACE
37 X 46.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 38.1% }PACE
35 X 31.3% }PACE
34 X 22.7% }PACE
33 X 15.9% }PACE
32 X 9.1% - - - - - -15PCT
31 X 6.3%
30 X 2.8%
29 X 0.6%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 72.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.1 %
File; Dale 2024-09
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF STANDUSTRIAL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - KATELLA / CERRITOS
CROSSWALKS AT KATELLA / CERRITOS (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME (NB+SB)

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW & 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (mobile homes) / COMMERCIAL / SCE SUB STN / RXR RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
*25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone File: Dale 2024-10 (NF) = Non-Fronting
The recommended 40 mph is 4.0 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 11,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X 2 1.1% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 98.9%
X X X 3 1.7% 97.7%
X X X 3 1.7% 96.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 94.3%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 89.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 85.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 81.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 73.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.7% 65.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.7% 56.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 46.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.1% 38.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 29.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.7% 20.6%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 10.9%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 6.3%
X X X X X 5 2.9% 3.4%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 175
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
File: Dale 2024-10

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.9%
48 X 97.7%
47 X 96.0%
46 X 94.3%
45 X 89.7% }PACE
44 X 85.1% }PACE
43 X 81.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 73.7% }PACE
41 X 65.7% }PACE
40 X 56.0% }PACE
39 X 46.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 38.3% }PACE
37 X 29.1% }PACE
36 X 20.6% }PACE
35 X 10.9% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 6.3%
33 X 3.4%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.9 %
File; Dale 2024-10
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET KATELLA AVE TO ORANGEWOOD AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NEAR ALAMITOS HIGH SCHOOL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - KATELLA / SCHOOL / ORANGEWOOD CROSSWALKS AT KATELLA / FRONT of SCHOOL (sch) / ORANGEWOOD (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)

OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (SB)

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE (btwn Davmor & Orangewood)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD-FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW & 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
NO PKNG 10pm-6am / NO PKNG 1st-3rd Wed (Street Sweeping) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL (at Katella) / CHURCH / HIGH SCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
*25 MPH When Children Present, School Zone File: Dale 2024-11 (NF) = Non-Fronting
The recommended 40 mph is 3.8 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 11,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET KATELLA AVE TO ORANGEWOOD AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.4%
X X X 3 1.9% 99.4%
X X X X X 5 3.2% 97.5%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 94.3%
45 X X X X X X 6 3.8% 89.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.6% 81.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.4% 73.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.3% 67.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.1% 59.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.6% 47.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.8% 37.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.6% 26.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.4% 19.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.0% 12.7%
X X X X 4 2.5% 5.7%
X X 2 1.3% 3.2%
X X X 3 1.9% 1.9%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 157
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.7 %
File: Dale 2024-11

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET KATELLA AVE TO ORANGEWOOD AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:25 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.4%
48 X 99.4%
47 X 97.5%
46 X 94.3%
45 X 89.8%
44 X 86.0% }PACE
43 X 81.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 73.9% }PACE
41 X 67.5% }PACE
40 X 59.2% }PACE
39 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 37.6% }PACE
37 X 26.8% }PACE
36 X 19.1% }PACE
35 X 12.7% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
34 X 5.7%
33 X 3.2%
32 X 1.9%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.7 %
File; Dale 2024-11
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET ORANGEWOOD AVE TO CHAPMAN AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:25 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF AUGUSTA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 0
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ORANGEWOOD / CHAPMAN
CROSSWALKS AT ORANGEWOOD (sch) / CHAPMAN (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER NO TRUCK TRAILOR PKNG
NO PKNG 2nd-4th (Wed+Fri Street Sweeping)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW & 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
NO PKNG 10pm-6am / NO PKNG 1st-3rd Wed (Street Sweeping)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = NON-FRONTING File: Dale 2024-12
The recommended 35 mph is 4.9 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 11,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET ORANGEWOOD AVE TO CHAPMAN AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:25 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.7%
45 X X X X 4 2.7% 96.7%
X X 2 1.3% 94.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 92.7%
X X X 3 2.0% 90.7%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 88.7%
40 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 85.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 75.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.0% 68.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.0% 60.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.3% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.0% 38.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 28.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 22.0%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 15.3%
30 X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 12.0%
X X X 3 2.0% 7.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 5.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 3.3%
X 1 0.7% 1.3%
25 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 150
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.3 %
File: Dale 2024-12

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET ORANGEWOOD AVE TO CHAPMAN AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:25 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 98.7%
45 X 96.7%
44 X 94.0%
43 X 92.7%
42 X 90.7%
41 X 88.7%
40 X 85.3%
39 X 81.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
38 X 75.3% }PACE
37 X 68.0% }PACE
36 X 60.0% }PACE
35 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 38.7% }PACE
33 X 28.7% }PACE
32 X 22.0% }PACE
31 X 15.3% }PACE
30 X 12.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
29 X 7.3%
28 X 5.3%
27 X 3.3%
26 X 1.3%
25 X 0.7%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.3 %
File; Dale 2024-12
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET CHAPMAN AVE TO BARR LANE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF BARR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.5 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CHAPMAN / LAMPSON
CROSSWALKS AT CHAPMAN (sch) / LAMPSON (sch) / ENAULT (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME / AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING MONDAYS 5am-9am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW & 2 WAY LEFT TURN & YELLOW SKIP
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (at Lampson) / SENIOR LIVING RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING, NF = Non-Fronting, File: Dale 2024-13
35 mph /*25 mph (School Zone) Posted In City of Garden Grove This section of Dale Street is a two lane roadway. Currently, within the segment there is not a posted speed limit.

A 35 mph speed limit and a 25 mph when children present signs are posted south of Barr Lane (out of the city limits). Field notes state that there are school crosswalks at Chapman Avenue, Lampson Avenue and Enault Street. With the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 38.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph, it is recommended that 35 mph speed signs be installed for this area.

0.49 11,750

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET CHAPMAN AVE TO BARR LANE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
45 X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X X 2 1.3% 98.7%
X 1 0.7% 97.4%
X X X 3 2.0% 96.7%
X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 94.8%
40 X X X X X 5 3.3% 90.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 86.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 82.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.8% 77.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.2% 69.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.8% 60.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.8% 51.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.8% 43.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.5% 33.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 24.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.2% 19.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 11.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.9% 5.9%
X X 2 1.3% 2.0%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 153
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.9 %
File: Dale 2024-13

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

DALE STREET CHAPMAN AVE TO BARR LANE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.3%
44 X 98.7%
43 X 97.4%
42 X 96.7%
41 X 94.8%
40 X 90.2%
39 X 86.9%
38 X 82.4% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
37 X 77.8% }PACE
36 X 69.9% }PACE
35 X 60.8% }PACE
34 X 51.0% }PACE
33 X 43.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 33.3% }PACE
31 X 24.8% }PACE
30 X 19.0% }PACE
29 X 11.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 5.9%
27 X 2.0%
26 X 0.7%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.9 %
File; Dale 2024-13
HCI

CITY OF STANTON

FERN AVENUE STARR STREET (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PALAIS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 19 - 28 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 3
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 1.61 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - CERRITOS / CHANTICLEER / STARR

CROSSWALKS AT CHANTICLEER

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL WITH AREAS OF HEAVY PARKING

OTHER PERMIT PARKING / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO STREET STRIPING
ADJACENT LAND USE SINGLE + MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / PARK RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F+NF = Fronting and non-fronting residential to the roadway File: Fern 2024-14 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is within 2.9 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.37 2,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

CITY OF STANTON

FERN AVENUE STARR STREET (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 99.2%
X X X 3 2.3% 96.9%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 94.6%
30 X X X 3 2.3% 90.7%
X X X X 4 3.1% 88.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 85.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 80.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.6% 73.6%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.9% 62.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12.4% 51.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.1% 38.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 28.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 20.2%
20 X X X X X X X X 8 6.2% 13.2%
X X X X X 5 3.9% 7.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 3.1%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 129
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 19 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.1 %
File: Fern 2024-14

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

CITY OF STANTON

FERN AVENUE STARR STREET (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 99.2%
32 X 96.9%
31 X 94.6%
30 X 90.7%
29 X 88.4%
28 X 85.3% }PACE
27 X 80.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 73.6% }PACE
25 X 62.0% }PACE
24 X 51.2% }PACE
23 X 38.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 28.7% }PACE
21 X 20.2% }PACE
20 X 13.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
19 X 7.0% }PACE
18 X 3.1%
17 X 0.8%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 19 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.1 %
File; Fern 2024-14
HCI

CITY OF STANTON
FERN AVENUE CERRITOS AVE TO PACIFIC ST (S. Terminus)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CERRITOS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (SB) / NOT POSTED (NB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 2
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 6.21 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - CERRITOS

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING PERMIT PARKING (west side) / HEAVY (east side)

OTHER AREAS OF TIME/DATE RESTRICTED PARKING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST (NB)
JUSTIFICATION:
(F) = Fronting File: Fern 2024-15
This section of Fern Avenue is a two lane roadway. A 25 mph speed sign is posted southbound only within the segment. Adjacent land uses are industrial buildings on east side and single family residential on the west side.

On-street parking is allowed with permit. The speed survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 27.8 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 20 to 29 mph. With that, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be maintained and a speed sign be installed north of Pacific St for the northbound direction.

0.21 1,050

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

CITY OF STANTON
FERN AVENUE CERRITOS AVE TO PACIFIC ST (S. Terminus)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.1%
0 0.0% 99.1%
X X X 3 2.6% 99.1%
X X X 3 2.6% 96.6%
30 X X X X 4 3.4% 94.0%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 90.6%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 86.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.4% 80.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.0% 70.9%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 13.7% 59.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.3% 45.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.8% 35.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5% 28.2%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 19.7%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.1% 13.7%
X X X X 4 3.4% 8.5%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 5.1%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 117
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.5 %
File: Fern 2024-15

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

CITY OF STANTON
FERN AVENUE CERRITOS AVE TO PACIFIC ST (S. Terminus)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 4:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 99.1%
33 X 99.1%
32 X 99.1%
31 X 96.6%
30 X 94.0%
29 X 90.6% }PACE
28 X 86.3% }PACE
27 X 80.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 70.9% }PACE
25 X 59.0% }PACE
24 X 45.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 35.0% }PACE
22 X 28.2% }PACE
21 X 19.7% }PACE
20 X 13.7% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
19 X 8.5%
18 X 5.1%
17 X 0.9%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.5 %
File; Fern 2024-15
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

GARDEN GROVE BOULEVARD BEACH BL TO FERN STREET (ECL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 9:15 AM - 9:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF FERN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 91.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 6
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (WB) - 3 LANES (EB)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH

CROSSWALKS AT BEACH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / CHURCH
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Garden Grove 2024-16
The recommended 40 mph is 2.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 42.9 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.25 25,350

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

GARDEN GROVE BOULEVARD BEACH BL TO FERN STREET (ECL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 9:15 AM - 9:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X X X 3 1.9% 98.8%
X X 2 1.3% 96.9%
45 X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 95.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 91.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.0% 86.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 76.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.0% 67.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 13.8% 57.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.6% 43.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 13.1% 33.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 20.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 11.3%
35 X X X X X 5 3.1% 4.4%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 160
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.4 %
File: Garden Grove 2024-16

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

GARDEN GROVE BOULEVARD BEACH BL TO FERN STREET (ECL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 9:15 AM - 9:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.4%
47 X 98.8%
46 X 96.9%
45 X 95.6% }PACE
44 X 91.3% }PACE
43 X 86.3% }PACE
42 X 76.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 67.5% }PACE
40 X 57.5% }PACE
39 X 43.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 33.1% }PACE
37 X 20.0% }PACE
36 X 11.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 4.4%
34 X 1.3%
33 X 0.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.4 %
File; Garden Grove 2024-16
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF KNOTT

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 65.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 12
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - KNOTT / WESTERN

CROSSWALKS AT KNOTT / WESTERN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (Many)

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL

OTHER AREAS OF NO STOPPING ANYTIME

AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING FRIDAY 9am-12pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT CURVE (at Bradford Pl)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

BUS STOPS
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (Mullti Fam) / MOBILE HOMES / MOTEL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Katella 2024-17
The recommended 45 mph is 3.0 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 48.0 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.52 28,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
0 0.0% 98.9%
X 1 0.6% 98.9%
X X 2 1.1% 98.3%
55 X 1 0.6% 97.2%
X X 2 1.1% 96.6%
X X X 3 1.7% 95.5%
X X 2 1.1% 93.9%
X X X 3 1.7% 92.7%
50 X X X X X 5 2.8% 91.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 88.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.4% 84.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 76.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 70.4%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.2% 64.2% X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 53.1%
X X X X 4 2.2% 46.9%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 44.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 40.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.5% 34.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 25.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.1% 19.6%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 13.4%
X X X X 4 2.2% 9.5%
35 X X X X 4 2.2% 7.3%
X X X 3 1.7% 5.0%
X 1 0.6% 3.4%
X 1 0.6% 2.8%
X X 2 1.1% 2.2%
30 X X 2 1.1% 1.1%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 179
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.6 %
File: Katella 2024-17

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 99.4%
58 X 98.9%
57 X 98.9%
56 X 98.3%
55 X 97.2%
54 X 96.6%
53 X 95.5%
52 X 93.9%
51 X 92.7%
50 X 91.1%
49 X 88.3%
48 X 84.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
47 X 76.5% }PACE
46 X 70.4% }PACE
45 X 64.2% }PACE
44 X 53.1% }PACE
43 X 46.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
42 X 44.7% }PACE
41 X 40.8% }PACE
40 X 34.6% }PACE
39 X 25.1% }PACE
38 X 19.6%
37 X 13.4% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.5%
35 X 7.3%
34 X 5.0%
33 X 3.4%
32 X 2.8%
31 X 2.2%
30 X 1.1%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 48.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 43.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 65.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.6 %
File; Katella 2024-17
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:50 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF CEDAR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 11
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH / ROSE / CEDAR / WESTERN

CROSSWALKS AT - BEACH / ROSE / CEDAR / WESTERN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (Many)

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

BUS STOPS / MANY AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

MANY CROSS-STREETS BTWN DALE & BEACH
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / CITY HALL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / RxR XING RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Katella 2024-18
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 2.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 28,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:50 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.9%
X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 98.3%
X X 2 1.1% 94.4%
45 X X X X X X X 7 3.9% 93.3%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 89.4%
X X X X X 5 2.8% 86.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 83.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 79.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.9% 72.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.2% 63.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 56.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 12.2% 50.0% X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 37.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.6% 32.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.4% 21.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 12.2%
X X 2 1.1% 7.2%
X X X 3 1.7% 6.1%
30 X X X X 4 2.2% 4.4%
X X 2 1.1% 2.2%
0 0.0% 1.1%
X 1 0.6% 1.1%
0 0.0% 0.6%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 180
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.2 %
File: Katella 2024-18

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:50 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.4%
48 X 98.9%
47 X 98.3%
46 X 94.4%
45 X 93.3%
44 X 89.4%
43 X 86.7%
42 X 83.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 79.4% }PACE
40 X 72.8% }PACE
39 X 63.9% }PACE
38 X 56.7% }PACE
37 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 37.8% }PACE
35 X 32.2% }PACE
34 X 21.7% }PACE
33 X 12.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
32 X 7.2%
31 X 6.1%
30 X 4.4%
29 X 2.2%
28 X 1.1%
27 X 1.1%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.2 %
File; Katella 2024-18
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:20 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF BOATMAN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 70.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 4
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.20 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DALE / BEACH

CROSSWALKS AT DALE / BEACH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (Many)

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

BUS STOPS / MANY AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWN GRADE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE / PAINTED ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Katella 2024-19
The recommended 45 mph is 1.1 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.49 27,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:20 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 100.0%
X X 2 1.3% 98.8%
50 X X X 3 1.9% 97.5%
X X X 3 1.9% 95.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 93.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 88.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 84.4%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 11.9% 75.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 63.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 53.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 44.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.6% 36.9%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 26.3%
X X X 3 1.9% 23.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 21.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 16.9%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 11.9%
X X 2 1.3% 6.9%
X X X 3 1.9% 5.6%
X X X 3 1.9% 3.8%
X 1 0.6% 1.9%
30 X 1 0.6% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 160
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.1 %
File: Katella 2024-19

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE BEACH BL TO DALE ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:40 AM - 12:20 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 98.8%
50 X 97.5%
49 X 95.6%
48 X 93.8% }PACE
47 X 88.8% }PACE
46 X 84.4% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
45 X 80.0% }PACE
44 X 75.0% }PACE
43 X 63.1% }PACE
42 X 53.8% }PACE
41 X 44.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 36.9% }PACE
39 X 26.3% }PACE
38 X 23.1%
37 X 21.3%
36 X 16.9%
35 X 11.9% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 6.9%
33 X 5.6%
32 X 3.8%
31 X 1.9%
30 X 1.3%
29 X 0.6%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 70.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 23.1 %
File; Katella 2024-19
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE DALE ST TO MAGNOLIA ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:05 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MAC

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 47.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 39 - 48 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 10
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DALE / MAGNOLIA

CROSSWALKS AT DALE / MAGNOLIA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
(NF) = NON-FRONTING File: Katella 2024-20
The recommended 45 mph speed limit is 2.1 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 27,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE DALE ST TO MAGNOLIA ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:05 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X X X 4 2.7% 100.0%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 97.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 92.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 84.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 79.1%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 72.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 64.9%
X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 57.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.1% 52.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 46.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.8% 39.2% X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 26.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 19.6%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 12.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 9.5%
35 X X 2 1.4% 4.1%
X 1 0.7% 2.7%
X X 2 1.4% 2.0%
0 0.0% 0.7%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 148
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.6 %
File: Katella 2024-20

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KATELLA AVENUE DALE ST TO MAGNOLIA ST
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:25 PM - 1:05 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 97.3%
48 X 92.6% }PACE
47 X 84.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
46 X 79.1% }PACE
45 X 72.3% }PACE
44 X 64.9% }PACE
43 X 57.4% }PACE
42 X 52.7% }PACE
41 X 46.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
40 X 39.2% }PACE
39 X 26.4% }PACE
38 X 19.6%
37 X 12.8% - - - - - -15PCT
36 X 9.5%
35 X 4.1%
34 X 2.7%
33 X 2.0%
32 X 0.7%
31 X 0.7%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 47.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 41.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.6 %
File; Katella 2024-20
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KNOTT AVENUE CERITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF KENMORE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CERRITOS / KATELLA

CROSSWALKS AT CERRITOS / KATELLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING PERMITTED (NB) / NO PARKING ANYTIME (SB)

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING FRIDAY 11am-2pm / BIKE LANE (SB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE (Katella to Kermore)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO (SB) - YES / FEW (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE

BUS STOPS
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (single+multi family) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NOTE: NCL is 530 ft n/o Cerritos Ave, 40 mph posted n/o Cerritos File: Knott 2024-21 The recommended 40 mph is 4.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 44.0 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.48 26,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KNOTT AVENUE CERITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X X 3 1.6% 100.0%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 98.4%
X X 2 1.0% 95.8%
X X X X 4 2.1% 94.8%
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 92.7%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 89.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.2% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 79.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.4% 72.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.4% 64.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.4% 55.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 11.0% 46.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 35.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.3% 28.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 22.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 19.4%
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 11.5%
X X X X 4 2.1% 7.9%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 5.8%
X X X X 4 2.1% 3.1%
30 X 1 0.5% 1.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 191
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.5 %

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KNOTT AVENUE CERITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.4%
48 X 95.8%
47 X 94.8%
46 X 92.7%
45 X 89.0%
44 X 84.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
43 X 79.6% }PACE
42 X 72.8% }PACE
41 X 64.4% }PACE
40 X 55.0% }PACE
39 X 46.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 35.6% }PACE
37 X 28.8% }PACE
36 X 22.5% }PACE
35 X 19.4% }PACE
34 X 11.5% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 7.9%
32 X 5.8%
31 X 3.1%
30 X 1.0%
29 X 0.5%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.5 %
File; Knott 2024-21
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KNOTT AVENUE KATELLA AVE TO RECYCLE WAY (SCL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF RECYCLE WAY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH NB

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - KATELLA / RECYCLE WAY

CROSSWALKS AT KATELLA / RECYCLE WAY

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (Many)

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME (SB) - PARTIAL / NO PARKING ANYTIME (NB) OTHER VEHICLE BACK UP NB AT KATELLA at PEAK HOURS
TRUCK ROUTE / BUS STOPS / NO PARKING FRIDAY 11am-2pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
LEGEND "KEEP CLEAR" (at Fulton) / DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION

SHORT DISTANCE BTWN INTERSECTION SURVEYED ON GREEN LIGHTS ONLY ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RESIDENTIAL (multi family) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST SOUTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Knott 2024-22
The recommended 40 mph is 2.0 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 42.0 mph and meets CVC standards.

Field notes state that there is a 40 speed sign posted northbound, areas of "No Stopping Anytime" and "No Parking Anytime", bus stops, vehicles back up northbound at Katella Avenue approach and this roadway is a truck route. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 40 mph speed sign be posted for the southbound direction.

0.23 31,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KNOTT AVENUE KATELLA AVE TO RECYCLE WAY (SCL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X X 2 1.3% 98.8%
X X X 3 1.9% 97.5%
X X 2 1.3% 95.6%
45 X X X X 4 2.5% 94.4%
X X X 3 1.9% 91.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 90.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 85.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.8% 78.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.0% 75.0%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 65.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.4% 60.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 51.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 45.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.8% 40.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.6% 31.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.6% 26.3%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 15.6%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 11.3%
30 X X X X X X 6 3.8% 8.1%
X X X 3 1.9% 4.4%
X X 2 1.3% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 160
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.6 %
File: Knott 2024-22

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

KNOTT AVENUE KATELLA AVE TO RECYCLE WAY (SCL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 99.4%
48 X 98.8%
47 X 97.5%
46 X 95.6%
45 X 94.4%
44 X 91.9%
43 X 90.0%
42 X 85.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 78.8% }PACE
40 X 75.0% }PACE
39 X 65.0% }PACE
38 X 60.6% }PACE
37 X 51.3% }PACE
36 X 45.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 40.6% }PACE
34 X 31.9% }PACE
33 X 26.3% }PACE
32 X 15.6%
31 X 11.3% - - - - - -15PCT
30 X 8.1%
29 X 4.4%
28 X 2.5%
27 X 1.3%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 69.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.6 %
File; Knott 2024-22
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

LAMPSON AVENUE WESTERN AVE (WCL) TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF CAMUS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 5
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.30 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH / WESTERN

CROSSWALKS AT BEACH / WESTERN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME

NO PARKING TUES, STREET SWEEPING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN & SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / RES (multi family) / RxR XING RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

Notes: Industrial on east-side of Beach Bl File: Lampson 2024-23 The recommended 40 mph is 3.9 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 43.9 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.34 13,350

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

LAMPSON AVENUE WESTERN AVE (WCL) TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X 2 1.2% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 98.8%
X X X 3 1.8% 98.2%
X X X 3 1.8% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 94.5%
45 X X X X X X X 7 4.3% 89.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 85.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 79.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.1% 73.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.1% 64.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 12.2% 54.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.0% 42.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.8% 31.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 22.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.1% 16.5%
35 X X X X X 5 3.0% 10.4%
X X X 3 1.8% 7.3%
X X X 3 1.8% 5.5%
X X 2 1.2% 3.7%
X X 2 1.2% 2.4%
30 X 1 0.6% 1.2%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 164
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.4 %
File: Lampson 2024-23

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

LAMPSON AVENUE WESTERN AVE (WCL) TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.8%
48 X 98.2%
47 X 96.3%
46 X 94.5%
45 X 89.6% }PACE
44 X 85.4% }PACE
43 X 79.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 73.2% }PACE
41 X 64.0% }PACE
40 X 54.9% }PACE
39 X 42.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 31.7% }PACE
37 X 22.0% }PACE
36 X 16.5% }PACE
35 X 10.4% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 7.3%
33 X 5.5%
32 X 3.7%
31 X 2.4%
30 X 1.2%
29 X 0.6%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.4 %
File; Lampson 2024-23
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

LAMPSON AVENUE BEACH BL TO CHATEAU (ECL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:25 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF CHETEAU

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 77.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION ( 2 Lanes 200' at Beach)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH

CROSSWALKS AT BEACH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB / AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND / SINGLE DASHED / 2 WAY LEFT ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (multi family) / COMMERCIAL (at Beach) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

Note: Elementary School e/o Chateau, in Garden Grove File: Lampson 2024-24 The recommended 40 mph is 1.9 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 41.9 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.15 27,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

LAMPSON AVENUE BEACH BL TO CHATEAU (ECL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:25 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
45 X X X X 4 2.7% 98.6%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 95.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 78.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 71.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 63.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 56.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.6% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.6% 40.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.2% 30.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 22.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 15.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 8.2%
X X 2 1.4% 2.7%
30 X X 2 1.4% 1.4%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 146
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
File: Lampson 2024-24

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

LAMPSON AVENUE BEACH BL TO CHATEAU (ECL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:25 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 99.3%
45 X 98.6%
44 X 95.9%
43 X 92.5% }PACE
42 X 85.6% }PACE
41 X 78.1% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
40 X 71.2% }PACE
39 X 63.7% }PACE
38 X 56.8% }PACE
37 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 40.4% }PACE
35 X 30.8% }PACE
34 X 22.6% }PACE
33 X 15.1%
32 X 8.2% - - - - - -15PCT
31 X 2.7%
30 X 1.4%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 77.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.1 %
File; Lampson 2024-24
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

MAGNOLIA STREET BALL ROAD TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:55 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF CERRITOS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 3
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.28 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - WINSTON / CERRITOS / BALL
CROSSWALKS AT WINSTON (sch) / CERRITOS / BALL

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE

BUS STOPS
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCAIL / RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F+NF = FRONTING AND NON-FRONTING File: Magnolia 2024-25 The recommended 40 mph is 3.6 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 43.6 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.37 26,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

MAGNOLIA STREET BALL ROAD TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:55 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 0.9% 99.5%
50 X X 2 0.9% 98.6%
X X X 3 1.4% 97.7%
X X 2 0.9% 96.3%
X X X X 4 1.9% 95.3%
X X X X X 5 2.3% 93.5%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 3.7% 91.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 87.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.0% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 8.9% 74.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 11.2% 65.4% 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 11.2% 54.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 10.7% 43.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 10.3% 32.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.5% 22.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.1% 14.5%
35 X X X X X X X 7 3.3% 8.4%
X X X X X 5 2.3% 5.1%
X X X X 4 1.9% 2.8%
X X 2 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 214
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
File: Magnolia 2024-25

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

MAGNOLIA STREET BALL ROAD TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:55 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.5%
50 X 98.6%
49 X 97.7%
48 X 96.3%
47 X 95.3%
46 X 93.5%
45 X 91.1% }PACE
44 X 87.4% }PACE
43 X 81.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 74.3% }PACE
41 X 65.4% }PACE
40 X 54.2% }PACE
39 X 43.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 32.2% }PACE
37 X 22.0% }PACE
36 X 14.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.4%
34 X 5.1%
33 X 2.8%
32 X 0.9%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
File; Magnolia 2024-25
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

MAGNOLIA STREET CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE (SCL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF PACIFIC

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH (NB) / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 5
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 14
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 2.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.54 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CERRITOS / PACIFIC / KATELLA / PED XING CROSSWALKS AT CERRITOS / PACIFIC (sch) / KATELLA / PED XING (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING THURSDAY 8am-11am

BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE & RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) / ELEM SCHOOL / RXR / BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F+NF_ = FRONTING AND NON-FRONTING File: Magnolia 2024-26 The recommended 40 mph is 2.1 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 42.1 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.49 25,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/11/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

MAGNOLIA STREET CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE (SCL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 99.4%
X X X 3 1.7% 98.3%
X X X 3 1.7% 96.7%
45 X X X X 4 2.2% 95.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 89.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.8% 84.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.1% 76.7%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 12.8% 65.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 11.7% 52.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.1% 41.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.6% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.3% 19.4%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 11.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 5.6%
X X X 3 1.7% 2.2%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 180
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.6 %
File: Magnolia 2024-26

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

MAGNOLIA STREET CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE (SCL)
DATE: 3/11/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.4%
47 X 98.3%
46 X 96.7%
45 X 95.0%
44 X 92.8% }PACE
43 X 89.4% }PACE
42 X 84.4% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 76.7% }PACE
40 X 65.6% }PACE
39 X 52.8% }PACE
38 X 41.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 30.0% }PACE
36 X 19.4% }PACE
35 X 11.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
34 X 5.6%
33 X 2.2%
32 X 0.6%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.6 %
File; Magnolia 2024-26
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO EAST END
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF WESTERN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 18 - 27 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.1 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - WESTERN

CROSSWALKS AT WESTERN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING TUES 8am-11am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD - FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF-Multi family) / COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS-INDUSTRIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Orangewood 2024-27
This section of Orangewood Avenue is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses include multi-family residential, commercial at Western Avenue, and business-industrial complexes. Currently, there is not a speed limit posted for this 0.12 section. With the results of the speed survey showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.2, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this roadway.

0.12 2,850

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/15/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO EAST END
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
X X 2 1.7% 98.3%
X X 2 1.7% 96.5%
30 X X X 3 2.6% 94.8%
X X X X 4 3.5% 92.2%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 88.7%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 78.3%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.3% 71.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.6% 60.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 50.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 42.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 33.9%
20 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 26.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 18.3%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 11.3%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 5.2%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 18 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 22.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 18.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
File: Orangewood 2024-27

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE WESTERN AVE TO EAST END
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:55 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 99.1%
32 X 98.3%
31 X 96.5%
30 X 94.8%
29 X 92.2%
28 X 88.7%
27 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 78.3% }PACE
25 X 71.3% }PACE
24 X 60.0% }PACE
23 X 50.4% }PACE
22 X 42.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
21 X 33.9% }PACE
20 X 26.1% }PACE
19 X 18.3% }PACE
18 X 11.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
17 X 5.2%
16 X 0.9%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 18 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 22.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 18.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
File; Orangewood 2024-27
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SANTA ROSALIA ST TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BEACH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1-2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH, STOP - SANTA ROSALIA

CROSSWALKS AT BEACH / SANTA ROSALIA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING TUES 8am-11am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (no driveways)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Orangewood 2024-28
The recommended 35 mph is 2.7 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.30 2,850

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SANTA ROSALIA ST TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
45 0 0.0% 99.3%
0 0.0% 99.3%
0 0.0% 99.3%
X X 2 1.4% 99.3%
X X X X 4 2.9% 97.8%
40 X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 94.9%
X X X X 4 2.9% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 87.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.5% 81.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.1% 74.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 13.8% 64.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.3% 50.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.6% 38.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.0% 26.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.2% 18.8%
30 X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 11.6%
X X X 3 2.2% 6.5%
X X X X X 5 3.6% 4.3%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 138
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
File: Orangewood 2024-28

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SANTA ROSALIA ST TO BEACH BL
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:35 PM - 3:05 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.3%
44 X 99.3%
43 X 99.3%
42 X 99.3%
41 X 97.8%
40 X 94.9% }PACE
39 X 89.9% }PACE
38 X 87.0% }PACE
37 X 81.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
36 X 74.6% }PACE
35 X 64.5% }PACE
34 X 50.7% }PACE
33 X 38.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
32 X 26.8% }PACE
31 X 18.8% }PACE
30 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 6.5%
28 X 4.3%
27 X 0.7%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
File; Orangewood 2024-28
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE BEACH BL TO PINE TREE LN (ECL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF JANE WAY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 6
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 1.30 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1-2 LANES (1 Lane EB Jane to Pinetree)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH

CROSSWALKS AT BEACH

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (Heavy-SB)

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB

SCHOOL BUSES IN AREA

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NO PARKING THURS STREET SWEEPING
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (multi-family)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

Note: Posted 40 mph wb near Dale - out of city limit File: Orangewood 2024-29 The recommended 35 mph is 4.9 mph below the 85th percentile speed of 39.9 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.28 7,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE BEACH BL TO PINE TREE LN (ECL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
45 X X 2 1.4% 98.6%
X X X 3 2.0% 97.3%
X X X X 4 2.7% 95.2%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 92.5%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 89.1%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.1% 85.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.2% 79.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 71.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.8% 64.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.8% 55.8%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.9% 46.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.2% 36.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 27.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 21.1%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 15.6%
30 X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 12.2%
X X X 3 2.0% 6.8%
X X X X 4 2.7% 4.8%
X 1 0.7% 2.0%
X X 2 1.4% 1.4%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 147
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.6 %
File: Orangewood 2024-29

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

ORANGEWOOD AVENUE BEACH BL TO PINE TREE LN (ECL)
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 98.6%
44 X 97.3%
43 X 95.2%
42 X 92.5%
41 X 89.1% }PACE
40 X 85.7% }PACE
39 X 79.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
38 X 71.4% }PACE
37 X 64.6% }PACE
36 X 55.8% }PACE
35 X 46.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 36.1% }PACE
33 X 27.9% }PACE
32 X 21.1% }PACE
31 X 15.6%
30 X 12.2% - - - - - -15PCT
29 X 6.8%
28 X 4.8%
27 X 2.0%
26 X 1.4%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.6 %
File; Orangewood 2024-29
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SANTA ROSALIA STREET ORANGEWOOD AVE TO CHAPMAN AVE
DATE: 2/26/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 4:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF SANTA CRUZ

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 22 - 31 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (SB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - ORANGEWOOD / CHAPMAN

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE

DIP S/O YORKSHIRE & ST GERTRUDE

Field observations include single family dwellings with heavy direct driveways. The need to retain the CVC defined lower speed is based on (1), 21 single-family dwellings on the west-side of roadway between a 0.25 section Orangewood Ave to Santa Catalina, and, (2) 21 single-family dwellings on the west-side of roadway between a 0.25 section Santa Catalina and Chapman Ave, and (3) numerous direct access driveways in a 0.25 section and, (3) characteristics of area is solely residential nature. This segment meets the requirement for the CVC 515 "Resident District". Therefore with all these factors, it is recommended that the City establish this segment of Santa Rosalia Street a Resident District". This segment does not require continued speed surveys.

0.49 2,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2/26/2019
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SANTA ROSALIA STREET ORANGEWOOD AVE TO CHAPMAN AVE
DATE: 2/26/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 4:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
35 100.0%
X X X 3 2.4% 100.0%
X X 2 1.6% 97.6%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 96.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.5% 91.3%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 85.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 81.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.7% 71.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 14.2% 63.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.8% 48.8%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.2% 37.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.4% 26.8%
X X X 3 2.4% 17.3%
X X X X X X X 7 5.5% 15.0%
X X X X 4 3.1% 9.4%
20 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 6.3%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 127
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.4 %
File: Santa Rosalia 2019 (2024) - 30

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SANTA ROSALIA STREET ORANGEWOOD AVE TO CHAPMAN AVE
DATE: 2/26/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:15 PM - 4:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 97.6%
32 X 96.1%
31 X 91.3% }PACE
30 X 85.8% }PACE
29 X 81.1% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
28 X 71.7% }PACE
27 X 63.0% }PACE
26 X 48.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 37.0% }PACE
24 X 26.8% }PACE
23 X 17.3% }PACE
22 X 15.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 9.4%
20 X 6.3%
19 X 1.6%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.4 %
File; Santa Rosalia 2019 (2024) - 30
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SANTA ROSALIA STREET CHAPMAN AVE TO LAMPSON AVE
DATE: 2/12/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF BELGRAVE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 30.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - CHAPMAN / LAMPSON / BENTLY

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)

OTHER AREAS OF PERMIT PARKING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE 2019, RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 (EXEMPT FROM SPEED STUDY) JUSTIFICATION:
(F) = Fronting (driveways). File: Santa Rosalia 2019-2024-31 This section of Santa Rosalia Street is a two lane roadway. It is posted at a 25 mph. The adjacent land use is solely residential. The need to retain the CVC defined lower speed is based on (1), 20 single-family dwellings on the west-side of roadway between a 0.25 section Chapman Ave to Bentley Ave, and, (2) 32 single-family dwellings between a 0.24 section Bentley Ave to Lampson Ave and (3) numerous (52) direct access driveways along this

0.49 segment and, (3) characteristics of area is solely residential nature. This segment meets the requirement for the CVC 515 "Resident District". Therefore with all these factors, it is recommended that the City establish this segment of Santa Rosalia Street a Resident District". This segment does not require continued speed surveys.

0.49 1,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2/12/2019
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SANTA ROSALIA STREET CHAPMAN AVE TO LAMPSON AVE
DATE: 2/12/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 80
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
File: Santa Rosalia 2019-2024-31

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SANTA ROSALIA STREET CHAPMAN AVE TO LAMPSON AVE
DATE: 2/12/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 98.8%
34 X 95.0%
33 X 92.5%
32 X 90.0% }PACE
31 X 86.3% }PACE
30 X 80.0% - - - - - - - - 85PCT }PACE
29 X 76.3% }PACE
28 X 63.8% }PACE
27 X 51.3% }PACE
26 X 42.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 35.0% }PACE
24 X 22.5% }PACE
23 X 13.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
22 X 7.5%
21 X 5.0%
20 X 3.8%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
File; Santa Rosalia 2019-2024-31
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SYRACUSE AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 2/25/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BOCK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 85.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH WB

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - KNOTT / WESTERN

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER PERMIT PARKING

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy south-side)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO STRIPING ON ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE 2019, RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 (EXEMPT FROM SPEED STUDY) JUSTIFICATION:
(F) = Fronting (driveways). File: Syracuse 2019-2024-32 This section of Syracuse Avenue is a two lane roadway. It is posted at a 25 mph. The adjacent land use is solely residential. The need to retain the CVC defined lower speed is based on (1), 22 single-family dwellings on the southside of roadway on 0.28 section between Knott Ave and Lowden St, and, (2) 16 single-family dwellings between a

0.23 section of Lowden St to Western Ave, and (3) numerous direct access driveways along this 0.51 segment and, (3) the characteristic and nature of the area is solely residential nature. This segment meets the requirement for the CVC 515 "Resident District". Therefore with all these factors, it is recommended that the City establish this segment of Syracuse Avenue a Resident District". This segment does not require continued speed surveys.

0.51 600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2/25/2019
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SYRACUSE AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 2/25/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 1.1% 100.0%
35 0 0.0% 98.9%
X X 2 2.2% 98.9%
0 0.0% 96.7%
X X X 3 3.3% 96.7%
X X X 3 3.3% 93.5%
30 X X X X X X 6 6.5% 90.2%
X X X X X 5 5.4% 83.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 8.7% 78.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 12.0% 69.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 12.0% 57.6%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 14.1% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 9.8% 31.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 8.7% 21.7%
X X X 3 3.3% 13.0%
X X X X X 5 5.4% 9.8%
20 X 1 1.1% 4.3%
X 1 1.1% 3.3%
X 1 1.1% 2.2%
0 0.0% 1.1%
X 1 1.1% 1.1%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 92
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.3 %
File:Syracuse 2019-2024-32

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

SYRACUSE AVENUE KNOTT AVE TO WESTERN AVE
DATE: 2/25/2019 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 3:00 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 98.9%
34 X 98.9%
33 X 96.7%
32 X 96.7%
31 X 93.5%
30 X 90.2% }PACE
29 X 83.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
28 X 78.3% }PACE
27 X 69.6% }PACE
26 X 57.6% }PACE
25 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
24 X 31.5% }PACE
23 X 21.7% }PACE
22 X 13.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 9.8% }PACE
20 X 4.3%
19 X 3.3%
18 X 2.2%
17 X 1.1%
16 X 1.1%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.3 %
File; Syracuse 2019-2024-32
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE BEACH BL TO GARDEN GROVE BL
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:20 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF BEACH BL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH NB

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BEACH / GARDEN GROVE

CROSSWALKS AT BEACH / GARDEN GROVE / PARK GLEN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL
OTHER NO SHOULDERS (Areas of)
AREAS OF RED CURB / NO PARKING, 11am-7pm (Street Sweeping)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE TO SHARP "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (multi-family) / RODEO 39 (Rear side of) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST SB
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Village Center 2024-33
The recommended 30 mph is 3.3 mph of the 85th percentile speed of 33.3 mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended a 30 mph speed sign be installed southbound.

0.33 2,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/15/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE BEACH BL TO GARDEN GROVE BL
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:20 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
0 0.0% 98.6%
X X X 3 2.0% 98.6%
X X 2 1.4% 96.6%
X X X 3 2.0% 95.2%
35 X X X X X 5 3.4% 93.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 89.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.1% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.2% 76.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.6% 66.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.2% 55.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.9% 44.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.6% 32.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.5% 20.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 12.9%
25 X X X X X 5 3.4% 6.1%
X X 2 1.4% 2.7%
X X 2 1.4% 1.4%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 147
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.1 %
File: Village Center 2024-33

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

VILLAGE CENTER DRIVE BEACH BL TO GARDEN GROVE BL
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:20 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 98.6%
38 X 98.6%
37 X 96.6%
36 X 95.2%
35 X 93.2% }PACE
34 X 89.8% }PACE
33 X 83.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
32 X 76.9% }PACE
31 X 66.7% }PACE
30 X 55.1% }PACE
29 X 44.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 32.0% }PACE
27 X 20.4% }PACE
26 X 12.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 6.1%
24 X 2.7%
23 X 1.4%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.1 %
File; Village Center 2024-33
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE PALAIS RD (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PALAIS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CERRITOS

CROSSWALKS AT CERRITOS

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW
ON-STREET PARKING YES w/AREAS OF NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER NO PARKING WED 11am-2pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL (at Cerritos) / RESIDENTIAL (F) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Western 2024-34
The recommended 40 mph is 3.6 mph of the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.25 18,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE PALAIS RD (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 100.0%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 96.9%
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 93.8%
X X X X X X X 7 4.4% 86.9%
X X X X 4 2.5% 82.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.0% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 70.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.1% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.6% 55.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.0% 45.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.9% 35.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 28.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.5% 20.6%
X X X X 4 2.5% 13.1%
X X X X 4 2.5% 10.6%
X X X 3 1.9% 8.1%
X X X 3 1.9% 6.3%
30 X X 2 1.3% 4.4%
X 1 0.6% 3.1%
X 1 0.6% 2.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.9%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
25 X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 160
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.1 %
File: Western 2024-34

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE PALAIS RD (NCL) TO CERRITOS AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 1:25 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 96.9%
45 X 93.8%
44 X 86.9% }PACE
43 X 82.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 80.0% }PACE
41 X 70.0% }PACE
40 X 63.8% }PACE
39 X 55.6% }PACE
38 X 45.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 35.0% }PACE
36 X 28.1% }PACE
35 X 20.6% }PACE
34 X 13.1% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 10.6%
32 X 8.1%
31 X 6.3%
30 X 4.4%
29 X 3.1%
28 X 2.5%
27 X 1.9%
26 X 1.3%
25 X 0.6%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 73.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.1 %
File; Western 2024-34
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF RAMBLEWOOD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 40.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 24
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 9
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.50 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.14 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CERRITOS / THUNDERBIRD-CENTRAL / KATELLA

CROSSWALKS AT CERRITOS / THUNDERBIRD-CENTRAL / KATELLA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING PARTIAL

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME
BIKE LANES (Narrow)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW & 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / CENTRAL PARK / RXR RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
(F+ NF) = Fronting and Non-Fronting (driveways to roadway) File: Western 2024-35 The recommended 40 mph is 0.1 mph of the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 40.1 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.49 19,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 98.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 97.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 91.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 89.8%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.5% 84.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 12.2% 74.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.1% 62.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.9% 56.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.6% 45.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 34.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.8% 27.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 20.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 15.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.8% 10.2%
30 X X X 3 2.0% 5.4%
X 1 0.7% 3.4%
0 0.0% 2.7%
X X 2 1.4% 2.7%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
25 X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 147
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.2 %

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE CERRITOS AVE TO KATELLA AVE
DATE: 3/12/2024 SURVEY BY: C.BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 98.6%
43 X 97.3%
42 X 91.8%
41 X 89.8% }PACE
40 X 84.4% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
39 X 74.8% }PACE
38 X 62.6% }PACE
37 X 56.5% }PACE
36 X 45.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
35 X 34.0% }PACE
34 X 27.2% }PACE
33 X 20.4% }PACE
32 X 15.6% }PACE
31 X 10.2% - - - - - -15PCT
30 X 5.4%
29 X 3.4%
28 X 2.7%
27 X 2.7%
26 X 1.4%
25 X 0.7%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 36.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.2 %
File; Western 2024-35
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE KATELLA AVE TO ORANGEWOOD AVE
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF RUTLEDGE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 44.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - KATELLA / ORANGEWOOD

CROSSWALKS AT KATELLA / ORANGEWOOD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

PAINTED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE (s/o Katella)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (SB) - YES / YES (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL / RESIDENTIAL (NF) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:
(NF) = Non-Fronting (driveways to roadway) File: Western 2024-36 The recommended 40 mph is 4.7 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 21,550

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/15/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE KATELLA AVE TO ORANGEWOOD AVE
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.0% 100.0%
50 X X 2 1.0% 99.0%
X X X X 4 2.1% 97.9%
X X X X 4 2.1% 95.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 93.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 90.6%
45 X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 86.5%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.7% 82.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.8% 77.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 12.0% 63.0% 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 12.5% 51.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.9% 38.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.3% 28.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 20.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 13.5%
35 X X X X X X X 7 3.6% 6.8%
X X X X 4 2.1% 3.1%
X X 2 1.0% 1.0%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 192
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.8 %
File: Western 2024-36

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE KATELLA AVE TO ORANGEWOOD AVE
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:40 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 99.0%
49 X 97.9%
48 X 95.8%
47 X 93.8%
46 X 90.6%
45 X 86.5% }PACE
44 X 82.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
43 X 77.6% }PACE
42 X 69.8% }PACE
41 X 63.0% }PACE
40 X 51.0% }PACE
39 X 38.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 28.6% }PACE
37 X 20.3% }PACE
36 X 13.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 6.8%
34 X 3.1%
33 X 1.0%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 44.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.8 %
File; Western 2024-36
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE ORANGEWOOD AVE TO SIMMONS PL (SCL)
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ORANGEWOOD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH (SB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ORANGEWOOD

CROSSWALKS AT ORANGEWOOD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (heavy)

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME

OTHER NO SHOULDERS

BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST NB
JUSTIFICATION:

File: Western 2024-37
The recommended 45 mph is 1.5 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.26 20,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/15/2024
HCI

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE ORANGEWOOD AVE TO SIMMONS PL (SCL)
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X X 2 1.1% 99.5%
50 X X X X X 5 2.7% 98.4%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 95.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.3% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.0% 88.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 11.2% 80.9% 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.0% 69.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.5% 60.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.0% 52.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.5% 43.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 34.6%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 27.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 19.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8% 14.9%
X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 10.1%
X X X X X 5 2.7% 6.4%
35 X X X X 4 2.1% 3.7%
X 1 0.5% 1.6%
X 1 0.5% 1.1%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 188
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y OF S T A N T O N

WESTERN AVENUE ORANGEWOOD AVE TO SIMMONS PL (SCL)
DATE: 3/15/2024 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:10 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 99.5%
50 X 98.4%
49 X 95.7%
48 X 93.1%
47 X 88.8% }PACE
46 X 80.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
45 X 69.7% }PACE
44 X 60.6% }PACE
43 X 52.1% }PACE
42 X 43.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
41 X 34.6% }PACE
40 X 27.1% }PACE
39 X 19.7% }PACE
38 X 14.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
37 X 10.1%
36 X 6.4%
35 X 3.7%
34 X 1.6%
33 X 1.1%
32 X 0.5%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 42.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %
File; Western 2024-37
HCI

APPENDIX B

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT WITH ORACLE AMERICA INC. FOR ORACLE NETSUITE FOR

GOVERNMENT, APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

WITH DAVISFARR, LLP FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES, AND

APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The City’s current enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, Springbrook Enterprise (Springbrook), was deployed approximately 20 years ago. Due to the current needs of the City that are not supported by the existing ERP system, the increasing costs of the existing software, and the insufficient customer service and technical support from Springbrook, staff researched alternative products that would best support the City’s operations.

Staff is recommending the City Council approve a professional services agreement with Oracle America, Inc. for Oracle NetSuite for Government, an ERP platform designed by Oracle specifically for small to mid-size government agencies. Staff is recommending utilizing the National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) cooperative agreement in accordance with the City’s purchasing policy for this purchase. The City received authorization from the California Department of General Services to participate in the NASPO cooperative agreement (Attachment A). If the City Council approves the master agreement for Oracle NetSuite for Government, then staff is also recommending the City Council approve a professional services agreement with DavisFarr LLP to provide part-time temporary accounting services while the City’s Accounting Manager dedicates 50% of her time to the ERP system implementation project (Attachment E).

The Fiscal Year 2024/25 estimated costs for these two agreements exceeds the project’s budgeted amount by $155,520.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

1. City Council find that these actions are not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment) and even if they were considered a project, Item: 12C
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 they would still be exempt from CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301; and

2. Approve an initial five (5) year Professional Services Master Agreement with Oracle America Inc. for Oracle NetSuite for Government for an approximate cost of $594,185, which includes one-time implementation costs not to exceed $263,354 (Attachment C) and annual subscription costs of $66,166 ($330,831 for all five years) (Attachment D); and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents; and

4. Waive competitive bidding requirements in the City’s purchasing policy related to temporary staffing services; and

5. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with DavisFarr LLP to provide temporary staffing services; and

6. Appropriate from the General Fund Special Projects Assigned Fund Balance $155,520 to complete the implementation of the new ERP system, including temporary staffing services to backfill City staff time during the implementation process.

BACKGROUND:

The City was informed that the developer of Springbrook would no longer provide updates and enhancements to the City’s existing Springbrook product. As an alternative, Springbrook offered access to their new platform, Springbrook Cirrus, at no additional cost to the City. Using live data, Finance Department staff started testing the new platform.

During testing, staff identified operational deficiencies as well as the lack of a functional human resources module and accounts receivable module. Staff began working with the developer to cure the identified issues and were told the two modules would be fully implemented by December 2023. The accounts receivable module went live in March 2024. In April 2024, the developer informed staff that the human resources module had been discontinued and they were purchasing outside software to work in conjunction with Cirrus. They also informed staff there was no guarantee that the cost of the new human resources software would not be passed on to end users. Given the unpredictability of the cost and timing to implement Springbrook Cirrus, staff researched other ERP systems.

Staff reached out to four different vendors known in the municipal government industry and received demonstrations for three of the vendors’ current ERP products. After 3 interviewing the vendors and evaluating the demonstrations, staff believe Oracle NetSuite for Government would best meet the current and future needs of the City.

Oracle NetSuite for Government is a comprehensive cloud-based ERP solution tailored specifically for small to midsize government organizations. Its unified platform provides modules such as financial management, budgeting, procurement, grant management, and more. Oracle NetSuite for Government's goal is to help agencies streamline operations, enhance transparency, and improve efficiency. It offers real-time data insights, empowering decision-makers with accurate information to make informed decisions and drive strategic initiatives.

Specific functionalities of the new system include:

1. Paperless routing and workflow of invoices and purchase orders. This will greatly increase efficiency in the accounts payable and purchasing process.

2. Cloud-based system accessible from any computer. This allows staff who work outside of City Hall to work more efficiently and in real time.

3. Enhanced ability to manage project accounting. The current system does not easily associate project tracking to the general ledger.

4. Digital signatures/approvals with complete audit trail for all transactions.

Directors will be able to review and approve invoices, purchase requisitions, and timesheets remotely.

5. Ability to store backup documentation including invoice copies, purchase orders, cash receipts, and journal entries into the system for historical record by way of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology.

Administrative Policy IV-4-12 Section 4.13 for the City contains guidelines for cooperative purchasing. Oracle Americas, Inc. is a participating vendor with the National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) ValuePoint. NASPO is a non-profit organization comprised of the Chief Procurement Officials of all 50 states that facilitates the administration of the NASPO cooperative group contracting consortium of state Chief Procurement Officials for the benefit of state departments and various other government agencies, including cities. By using NASPO, staff can procure this software at a competitive price without expending staff resources on the formal proposal process.

The project is estimated to take 12-15 months depending on how much staff time is dedicated to the implementation process. Management evaluated the current and projected staffing in the Finance Department and has determined that to complete the project within the estimated time frame, additional staff will be necessary. Therefore, staff is recommending the City Council approve a professional services agreement with DavisFarr LLP. The specific individual that DavisFarr would assign has served as 4 interim Accounting Manager on two prior occasions with the City so is familiar with the City’s financial procedures/processes and systems. It is proposed that this individual would provide 20 hours per week backfilling the current Accounting Manager’s duties while she dedicates the equivalent time to implementing the new ERP system.

The proposed cost for implementation, cloud hosting fees and additional staffing is:

Implementation One-time fee $263,354
Annual Maintenance Annually for 5 years 66,166
DavisFarr Contract 1,200 hours 126,000
Total Implementation Costs $455,520
Oracle requires cloud hosting fees to be paid during the implementation process. The annual maintenance costs are fixed (no increase) for the first five years of the agreement. After the initial five-year term, each successive three-year term for cloud hosting and maintenance fees will be subject to a 5% cost increase annually.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding for this project of $300,000 was included in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Adopted Budget with funding from the General Fund Special Projects Assigned Fund Balance (Task Code No. 2024-803). The total cost for the implementation of Oracle NetSuite for Government is estimated to be $455,520 as outlined in the previous table. Staff is requesting an appropriation of $155,520 from the General Fund Special Projects Assigned Fund Balance. The projects funded by the General Fund Special Projects Assigned Fund Balance in Fiscal Year 2023/24 realized $555,400 in budget savings alone from unfilled or underfilled limited term staff positions and completed projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act Section 15061(b)(3), 15273.

LEGAL REVIEW:

Not Applicable
STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES ADDRESSED:

Obj. No. 4: Ensure fiscal stability and efficiency in governance.

Obj. No. 6: Maintain and promote a responsive, high quality and transparent government.
5 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda process.

Prepared by: Amy Massey, Accounting Manager
Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. California Department of General Services Authorization Letter B. NASPO Participating Addendum
C. Professional Services Ordering Document (Implementation) D. Oracle Ordering Document (Subscription)
E. Professional Services Agreement with DavisFarr LLP

ATTACHMENT A
Click here to return to the agenda.

NASPO ValuePoint

PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM
CLOUD SOLUTIONS 2016-2026
Led by the State of Utah

Page 1 of 3 ends

Stanton City CouncilAugust 27, 2024

Stanton City Council
August 27, 2024