Agenda — Stanton City Council, August 27, 2024 (part 1 of 4)

NOTICE AND CALL

CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

SPECIAL MEETING

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF STANTON AND TO THE CITY CLERK / SECRETARY:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of the City Council / Successor Agency / Stanton Housing Authority for the City of Stanton is hereby called by the Mayor / Chairman, to be held on August 27, 2024, commencing at 5:30 p.m. at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680.

The Agenda for the Special Meeting is attached to this Notice and Call.

Dated: August 22, 2024
s/ Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk / Secretary

IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, IF YOU NEED SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT (714) 890-4245. NOTIFICATION PRIOR TO THE MEETING WILL ENABLE THE CITY TO MAKE REASONABLE ARRANGEMENTS TO ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO THIS MEETING.

PUBLIC ACCESS IN-PERSON AND VIA TELECONFERENCE
(Electronically / Telephonically)
Attendance by the members of the public may view the meeting live in one of the following ways:
• Attend in person - City Council Chambers: 7800 Katella Avenue, California 90680. • Via Teleconference (electronically / telephonically) - Zoom:

In order to join the meeting via telephone please follow the steps below:

1. Dial the following phone number +1 (669) 444-9171 (US).

2. Dial in the following Meeting ID: (873 9617 3009) to be connected to the meeting.

In order to join the meeting via electronic device please utilize the Zoom URL link below:
• https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87396173009?pwd=wd1BBI0pCxxuRxucvBUE6hOw1R9PyC.1

ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY DO SO AS FOLLOWS:
• Attend in person and complete and submit a request to speak card to the City Clerk. • E-Mail your comments to [email protected] with the subject line “PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #” (insert the item number relevant to your comment). Comments received no later than 5:00 p.m. before the scheduled meeting will be compiled, provided to the City Council, and made available to the public before the start of the meeting. Staff will not read e-mailed comments at the meeting. However, the official record will include all e-mailed comments received until the close of the meeting.

Should you have any questions related to participation in the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 890-4245 or via e-mail at [email protected].

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 1 of 15 ends

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

SPECIAL & JOINT REGULAR MEETING
STANTON CITY HALL, 7800 KATELLA AVENUE, STANTON, CA
TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2024
SPECIAL CLOSED SESSION - 5:30 P.M.

JOINT REGULAR SESSION - 6:30 P.M.

In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 890-4245 or via e-mail at [email protected].

Notification prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

In order to join the meeting via telephone please follow the steps below:

1. Dial the following phone number +1 (669) 444-9171 (US).

2. Dial in the following Meeting ID: (873 9617 3009) to be connected to the meeting.

In order to join the meeting via electronic device please utilize the Zoom URL link below:
• https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87396173009?pwd=wd1BBI0pCxxuRxucvBUE6hOw1R9PyC.1

Should you have any questions related to participation in the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 890-4245 or via e-mail at [email protected].

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 2 of 15 ends

The City Council agenda and supporting documentation is made available for public review and inspection during normal business hours in the Office of the City Clerk, 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton California 90680 immediately following distribution of the agenda packet to a majority of the City Council. Packet delivery typically takes place on Thursday afternoons prior to the regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday. The agenda packet is also available for review and inspection on the city’s website at www.StantonCA.gov.

1. CLOSED SESSION (5:30 PM)

2. ROLL CALL Council / Agency / Authority Member Taylor Council / Agency / Authority Member Torres
Council / Agency / Authority Member Van
Mayor Pro Tem / Vice Chairperson Warren
Mayor / Chairman Shawver

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Closed Session may convene to consider matters of purchase / sale of real property (G.C. §54956.8), pending litigation (G.C. §54956.9(a)), potential litigation (G.C. §54956.9(b)) or personnel items (G.C. §54957.6). Records not available for public inspection.

4. CLOSED SESSION
4A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Number of Potential Cases: 2

5. CALL TO ORDER STANTON CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY JOINT REGULAR MEETING (6:30 PM)

6. ROLL CALL Council / Agency / Authority Member Taylor Council / Agency / Authority Member Torres
Council / Agency / Authority Member Van
Mayor Pro Tem / Vice Chairperson Warren
Mayor / Chairman Shawver

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

8. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
A. Presentation by WAGS Pet Adoption, sharing their mission with the City Council and providing information on their current operations.

B. Presentation by the Stanton Community Services Department providing the City Council with an update on FRC (Family Resource Center) Services.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 3 of 15 ends

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar may be acted on simultaneously, unless a Council/Board Member requests separate discussion and/or action.

CONSENT CALENDAR
9A. MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON THE

PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER READING WAIVED
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council/Agency Board/Authority Board waive reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.
9B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
City Council approve demand warrants dated June 28, 2024 – August 8, 2024, in the amount of $17,256,030.56.
9C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority approve Minutes of Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024.
9D. JUNE 2024 INVESTMENT REPORT
The Investment Report as of June 30, 2024, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of June 2024.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 4 of 15 ends

9E. JUNE 2024 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY)
The Investment Report as of June 30, 2024, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Successor Agency find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of June 2024. 9F. JUNE 2024 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; STATUS OF CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended June 30, 2024, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

2.20.080 (D) and is being provided to City Council. This report includes information for both the City’s General Fund and the Housing Authority Fund. The figures reported represent preliminary figures through June 30, 2024. The fiscal year end closing process is still in progress and the final figures are pending completion of the City’s annual financial statement audit.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund June 2024 Revenue and Expenditure Reports and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended June 30, 2024.
9G. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE

STANTON FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER UNDER THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES TOGETHER (FaCT) PROGRAM
Resolution No. 2024-30 will authorize the City to submit an application for grant funds for the Stanton Family Resource Center under the County of Orange Families and Communities Together (FaCT) Program to provide human and social services from the County of Orange Social Services Agency.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 5 of 15 ends

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under section 15061(b)(4) – the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and

2. Approve Resolution No. 2024-30, authorizing the application for FaCT grant funding, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT

FUNDS FOR FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER UNDER THE COUNTY OF
ORANGE FAMILIES AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER (FaCT)
PROGRAM”; and

3. Authorize the Community Services Director to sign the Families and Community Together (FaCT) Program Grant Application.
9H. RESPONSE TO THE 2023-2024 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT DATED JUNE 11, 2024, ENTITLED, “TALKING TRASH: RECYCABLES AND ORGANIC WASTE”
On June 11, 2024, the Orange County Grand Jury released a report entitled “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste” (Attachment A). The purpose of the report was to review the challenges of complying with the requirements and goals of State of California Senate Bill 1383 which requires jurisdictions responsible for waste collection to coordinate with their residents to divert organic waste from landfill waste disposal streams. California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 require any public agency that the Grand Jury reviews respond to the findings and recommendations of the Grand Jury Report. The City’s proposed response letter responds to each of the applicable findings and recommendations (Attachment B).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities or governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the response letter to the Orange County Grand Jury related to the findings and recommendations contained in the June 11, 2024, report entitled “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste”.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 6 of 15 ends

9I. RESPONSE TO THE 2023-2024 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT DATED JUNE 11, 2024, ENTITLED, “E-BIKES FRIEND OR FOE”
On June 20, 2024, the Orange County Grand Jury released a report entitled “E-bikes Friend or Foe” (Attachment A). The report focused on E-bike regulation, education, and safety and what, if any, pertinent regulations have been adopted by Orange County cities.

California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 require any public agency that the Grand Jury reviews respond to the findings and recommendations of the Grand Jury Report. The City’s proposed response letter responds to each of the applicable findings and recommendations (Attachment B).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities or governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the response letter to the Orange County Grand Jury related to the findings and recommendations contained in the June 20, 2024, report entitled “E-bikes Friend or Foe”.
9J. AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO SCA OF CA, LLC FOR

CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
As the current contract for citywide street sweeping services is set to expire on September 30, 2024, City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) in April 2024. Staff recommend awarding a three-year contract to SCA of CA, LLC in an amount not-to-exceed $627,177 or $199,059 annually. As part of the funding for these services, staff is requesting an appropriation to the City’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Operating Budget of $35,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 1, Section 15301(h) as maintenance of existing landscaping; and

2. Award and authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement between the City and SCA of CA, LLC to provide citywide street sweeping services in an amount not-to-exceed $627,177 or $199,059 annually for a term of three years; and

3. Appropriate $35,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211) to Account 211-3500-608100.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 7 of 15 ends

9K. ACCEPTANCE OF THE FY 2022/23 CITYWIDE STREET RESURFACING PROJECT

BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA
The FY 2022/23 Citywide Street Resurfacing Project consisting of the demolition and removals, roadway modifications, concrete work (ramps and sidewalks), asphalt pavement, signing and striping, and all appurtenant work for various streets throughout the City of Stanton is now complete. The final construction cost for the project was $1,101,427.91, below the awarded contract amount. The City Engineer, in his judgment, certifies that the work was satisfactorily completed as of August 8, 2024, and recommends that the City Council accept the completed work performed on this project.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare this project categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, and 15301(c) as repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing public structures; and

2. Accept the completion of improvements for the FY 2022/23 Citywide Street Resurfacing Project, as certified by the City Engineer, and affix the date of August 8, 2024, as the date of completion of all work on this project; and

3. Approve the final construction contract amount of $1,101,427.91 with Onyx Paving Company, Inc.; and

4. Direct the City Clerk within ten (10) days from the date of acceptance to file the Notice of Completion (Attachment) with the County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Orange; and

5. Direct City staff, after thirty-five (35) days has elapsed from the filing of the “Notice of Completion” with the County Clerk-Recorder, to make the retention payment to Onyx Paving Company, Inc. in the amount of $55,071.40.
9L. AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION: FY 2023/2024 CITYWIDE

ALLEY RESURFACING PROJECT
The plans and specifications for the FY 2022/2023 Citywide Alley Resurfacing Project are substantially complete. In the interest of time, the City Engineer is recommending City Council approve the draft specifications and plans for bidding, subject to revision by the City Engineer and the City Attorney, to ensure the construction contract is awarded in an efficient and timely manner. The Project plans and specifications are available in the City Engineer’s Office for review.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 8 of 15 ends

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Class 1, Section 15301(c) as repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing public structures; and

2. Approve the bid specifications and plans, subject to revisions required by the City Engineer and the City Attorney; and

3. Authorize and advertise for bids the FY 2023/2024 Citywide Alley Resurfacing Project. 9M. LEASE AGREEMENT WITH WIRELESS CCTV, LLC FOR LEASE OF THREE

ADDITIONAL CAMERA TRAILERS AS PART OF THE SAFE STREETS TOGETHER

CAMPAIGN UTILIZING COOPERATIVE PURCHASING
The City launched its Safe Streets Together: United Against Exploitation campaign in July 2024. One of the impact areas the campaign focuses on is reducing the demand for prostitution and the illegal sale of sex, through the implementation of various strategies.

Cameras can decrease the demand for prostitution and human trafficking by increasing the risk of detection and arrest for buyers of illegal sex. The presence of cameras provides heightened surveillance and accountability, discouraging individuals from engaging in or facilitating prostitution and human trafficking. The Council approved the initial lease of two solar camera trailers at its meeting of June 25, 2024. Staff is requesting authorization to lease three additional solar camera trailers to support the demand reduction objectives utilizing cooperative purchasing and the City of Palmdale’s contract.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a second lease agreement with Wireless CCTV, LLC for three solar camera trailers for a rental term of 3 months and a monthly rate of $4,650, for an annual rental amount of $13,950; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to approve additional costs as needed and determined by City staff, for any contingencies up to 15% of the agreement amount.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 9 of 15 ends

9N. AWARD OF CONTRACT TO INTERIOR DEMOLITION, INC. FOR THE 8940 PACIFIC

AVENUE DEMOLITION AND ABATEMENT PROJECT IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE IN THE AMOUNT OF $96,000
At its meeting of June 25, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract for the 8930 Pacific Avenue Demolition and Abatement Project after one of the detached garages associated with 8930 Pacific Avenue was severely damaged by a fire started by transients. The transients that were trespassing and breaking into 8930 Pacific Avenue have now begun trespassing and breaking into 8940 Pacific Avenue, another neighboring vacant 4-plex building. The City has received multiple calls for service related to trespassing, and during one of the recent responses, staff was threatened by a transient brandishing a wine bottle as a weapon. Staff is recommending demolition at this time due to concerns from residents, the property manager, and the City. The City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines allow for exceptions to the standard procurement procedures when it is determined to be in the best interests of the City to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare of the community. As such, staff is recommending award of contract to Interior Demolition, Inc., which was the lowest responsible bidder in 2022, and was most recently awarded the 8930 Pacific Avenue Demolition and Abatement Project.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare the work proposed under this scope increase to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 1, Section 15301l (3); and

2. Authorize staff to exercise an exception to the standard procurement procedures in the best interests of the City to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare of the community; and

3. Award a construction contract to Interior Demolition, Inc., to provide professional demolition and abatement services in the amount of $96,000; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to bind the City of Stanton and Interior Demolition, Inc. in a contract to provide the services; and

5. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders with Interior Demolition, Inc., as needed and determined by City staff, for any contingencies up to 15% of the contract amount.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 10 of 15 ends

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
10A. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING REQUEST TO MODIFY FEES FOR TRAFFIC

VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM
Consideration of adjustment to the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program (TVAP) fees to reflect current operating costs.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 21080(b)(8) of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15273(a)(1) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations because CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and

2. Conduct a Public Hearing; and

3. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-29 permitting the Sheriff-Coroner Department to adjust the TVAP fee to $174.00, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT ITS UPDATED FEE FOR THE TRAFFIC
VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF STANTON”.

11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
11A. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 1144 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 20.400.030 OF THE

STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE STANDARDS FOR ALCOHOL

SALES IN MIXED-USE OVERLAY AREAS
This Ordinance was introduced at the regular City Council meeting of July 23, 2024.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 1144, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 20.400.030 OF THE STANTON

MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE STANDARDS FOR ALCOHOL
SALES IN MIXED-USE OVERLAY AREAS”; and

2. City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1144.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 11 of 15 ends

12. NEW BUSINESS
12A. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1146 AMENDING CHAPTER 20.540 OF THE

STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY USES At its regular meeting of May 14, 2024, the City Council requested information from staff regarding the Special Event and Temporary Use Permit process. The City Council then directed staff to review the existing regulations for Special Event and Temporary Use Permits and return with appropriate amendments that would support existing businesses and newer trends. Staff reviewed Chapter 20.540 and prepared an Ordinance with updates to allow additional flexibility and options for new special event trends and streamline the application process. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, 2024, and voted to approve the Resolution recommending adoption of the proposed Ordinance with an amendment.

The City Council is asked to consider the proposed Ordinance and recommended amendment for Chapter 20.540 of the Stanton Municipal Code to update regulations for temporary uses. The City Council has the discretion to accept the proposed Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission or make additional appropriate modifications.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council conduct the public hearing and first reading of Ordinance No. 1146, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 20.540 OF THE STANTON

MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE REGULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY
USES”; and

2. Declare that the project is exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under section 15061(b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have a significant impact on the environment; and

3. Set September 10, 2024, as the date for second reading for adoption of Ordinance No. 1146.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 12 of 15 ends

12B. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.04 OF TITLE 10 OF THE CITY OF

STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO IMPLEMENT THE SPEED LIMITS CONSISTENT

WITH CURRENT ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND FINDING THE

ACTION EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The City Engineer recommends that the City Council accept the engineering and traffic survey and consider an ordinance updating the prima facie speed limits at various locations throughout the City to best protect the health and safety of residents.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare the action to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15378(b)(5) – Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment; and

2. Approve the 2024 Engineering and Traffic Survey to establish speed limits in the City of Stanton; and

3. Introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1149, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON AMENDING CHAPTER 10.04 OF TITLE 10 OF THE STANTON

MUNICIPAL CODE TO IMPLEMENT THE SPEED LIMITS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS”; and

4. Set September 10, 2024, as the date for second reading for adoption of Ordinance No. 1149.
12C. AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT WITH ORACLE AMERICA INC. FOR ORACLE NETSUITE FOR GOVERNMENT, APPROVE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAVISFARR, LLP FOR

ACCOUNTING SERVICES, AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS The City’s current enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, Springbrook Enterprise (Springbrook), was deployed approximately 20 years ago. Due to the current needs of the City that are not supported by the existing ERP system, the increasing costs of the existing software, and the insufficient customer service and technical support from Springbrook, staff researched alternative products that would best support the City’s operations.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 13 of 15 ends

Staff is recommending the City Council approve a professional services agreement with Oracle America, Inc. for Oracle NetSuite for Government, an ERP platform designed by Oracle specifically for small to mid-size government agencies. Staff is recommending utilizing the National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) cooperative agreement in accordance with the City’s purchasing policy for this purchase. The City received authorization from the California Department of General Services to participate in the NASPO cooperative agreement (Attachment A). If the City Council approves the master agreement for Oracle NetSuite for Government, then staff is also recommending the City Council approve a professional services agreement with DavisFarr LLP to provide part-time temporary accounting services while the City’s Accounting Manager dedicates 50% of her time to the ERP system implementation project (Attachment E). The Fiscal Year 2024/25 estimated costs for these two agreements exceeds the project’s budgeted amount by $155,520.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that these actions are not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment) and even if they were considered a project, they would still be exempt from CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301; and

2. Approve an initial five (5) year Professional Services Master Agreement with Oracle America Inc. for Oracle NetSuite for Government for an approximate cost of $594,185, which includes one-time implementation costs not to exceed $263,354 (Attachment C) and annual subscription costs of $66,166 ($330,831 for all five years) (Attachment D); and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents; and

4. Waive competitive bidding requirements in the City’s purchasing policy related to temporary staffing services; and

5. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with DavisFarr LLP to provide temporary staffing services; and

6. Appropriate from the General Fund Special Projects Assigned Fund Balance $155,520 to complete the implementation of the new ERP system, including temporary staffing services to backfill City staff time during the implementation process.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 14 of 15 ends

13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC
At this time members of the public may address the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council/Successor Agency/Stanton Housing Authority, provided that NO action may be taken on non-agenda items.
• Members of the public wishing to address the Council/Agency/Authority during Oral Communications-Public or on a particular item are requested to fill out a REQUEST TO SPEAK form and submit it to the City Clerk. Request to speak forms must be turned in prior to Oral Communications-Public.
• When the Mayor/Chairman calls you to the microphone, please state your Name, slowly and clearly, for the record. A speaker’s comments shall be limited to a three (3) minute aggregate time period on Oral Communications and Agenda Items. Speakers are then to return to their seats and no further comments will be permitted. • Remarks from those seated or standing in the back of chambers will not be permitted.

All those wishing to speak including Council/Agency/Authority and Staff need to be recognized by the Mayor/Chairman before speaking.

14. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None.

15. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED BUSINESS 15A. COMMITTEE REPORTS/ COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY ANNOUNCEMENTS At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may report on items not specifically described on the agenda which are of interest to the community provided no discussion or action may be taken except to provide staff direction to report back or to place the item on a future agenda.
15B. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE MEETING At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future agenda. 15C. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE STUDY

SESSION
At this time Council/Agency/Authority Members may place an item on a future study session agenda.

Currently Scheduled: None.

Stanton City Council Agenda Prepared by the Office of the City Clerk August 27, 2024

Page 15 of 15 ends

16. ITEMS FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL/AUTHORITY COUNSEL

17. ITEMS FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
17A. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
At this time the Orange County Sheriff’s Department will provide the City Council with an update on their current operations.

18. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted at the Post Office, Stanton Community Services Center and City Hall, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 22nd day of August, 2024. s/ Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk/Secretary

June 28 - August 8, 2024
Payments to Vendors:

Electronic Transaction Nos. $ 12,934,682.23
Check Nos. 138120-138304 (B) 1,688,088.35
Other Electronic Transactions ACH (C) 2,181,047.65
Total Payments to Vendors $ 16,803,818.23
Direct Deposit Payments (D):

Payroll dated June 28, 2024 2,655.72
Payroll dated July 3, 2024 140,775.22
Payroll dated July 18, 2024 152,400.49
Payroll dated July 24, 2024 55.30
Payroll dated August 1, 2024 156,325.60
Total Direct Deposit Payments $ 452,212.33
TOTAL PAYMENTS $ 17,256,030.56
Notes:

A = Check numbers 3342-3344 were voided and re-issued as "ACH" transactions on July 19, 2024.

B = Check numbers 138248-138250 were damaged during the check printing process.

C = These are electronic payments processed via a file exported from the City's Finance system and uploaded to the City's bank account. The City's Finance system designates these payment transactions as "ACH". A specific transaction number is not assigned.

D = Represents the total net payroll paid through direct deposit on pay date.

Demands listed on the attached
registers are accurate and funds
are available for payment thereof.
/s/ Hannah Shin-Heydorn /s/ Michelle Bannigan

CITY OF STANTON

WARRANT REGISTER
3299-3379 (A)
conform to the City of Stanton Annual
Budget as approved by the City Council.

Demands listed on the attached registers
City Manager Finance Director
Item: 9B
Click here to return to the agenda.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 3 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 4 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 5 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 6 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 7 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 8 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 9 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 10 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 11 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 12 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 13 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 14 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 15 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 16 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 17 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 18 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 19 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 20 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 21 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 22 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 23 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 24 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 25 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 26 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 27 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 28 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 29 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 30 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 31 of 32 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 32 of 32 ends

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 1 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF STANTON MEETING JULY 23, 2024

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING (5:00 PM)

JOINT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING (6:30 PM)

1. CALL TO ORDER / CLOSED SESSION
The City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor / Chairman Shawver.

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Council/Agency/Authority Member Taylor, Council/Agency/Authority Member Torres, Council/Agency/Authority Member Van, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairperson Warren, and Mayor/Chairman Shawver.

Absent: None.

Excused: None.

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS None.

4. CLOSED SESSION
The members of the City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority of the City of Stanton proceeded to closed session at 5:02 p.m. for discussion regarding:
4A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Number of Potential Cases: 1
4B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Attorney
Item: 9C
Click here to return to the agenda.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 2 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
4C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Number of cases: 1
Case Name: Tina Pacific Residents Association, et al. v. City of Stanton Case Number: 30-2023-01316300-CU-WM-CXC

5. CALL TO ORDER / SUCCESSOR AGENCY / STANTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

MEETING
The City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority reconvened in open session at 6:30 p.m.

6. ROLL CALL

Present: Council/Agency/Authority Member Taylor, Council/Agency/Authority Member Torres, Council/Agency/Authority Member Van, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairperson Warren, and Mayor/Chairman Shawver.

Absent: None.

Excused: None.

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Ms. Kara Miles.

The City Attorney / Agency Counsel reported that the Stanton City Council / Successor Agency / Housing Authority met in closed session from 5:02 to 6:30 p.m.

The City Attorney / Agency Counsel reported that there was no reportable action.

8. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
Presentation by Mr. Eric O’Donnell, Director, Townsend Public Affairs, providing the City Council with an update on State and Federal Legislation.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 3 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion/Second: Torres/Warren
Motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 (Shawver, Taylor, Torres, Van, and Warren)
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion unanimously carried:

CONSENT CALENDAR
9A. MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON

THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER

READING WAIVED
The City Council/Agency Board/Authority Board waived reading of Ordinances and Resolutions.
9B. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
The City Council approved demand warrants dated June 14, 2024 – June 27, 2024, in the amount of $2,324,470.54.
9C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority approved Minutes of Joint Regular Meeting – July 9, 2024.
9D. AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE STANTON COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – BACKUP GENERATOR The plans and specifications for the Stanton Community Center Improvement Project – Backup Generator are complete. The City Engineer is recommending City Council approve the specifications and plans for bidding, subject to revision by the City Engineer and the City Attorney, to ensure the construction contract is awarded in an efficient and timely manner. The Project plans and specifications are available in the City Engineer’s Office for review.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 4 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

1. The City Council declared that this action to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), since the action herein does not constitute a “project” as defined by Section 15378 of the CEQA guidelines; and

2. Approved the bid specifications and plans, subject to revisions required by the City Engineer and the City Attorney; and

3. Authorized and advertise for bids on the Stanton Community Center Improvements Project – Backup Generator.
9E. AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITYWIDE

CONCRETE REPAIR PROJECT
The plans and specifications for the Citywide Concrete Repair Project are complete.

The City Engineer is recommending City Council approve the specifications and plans for bidding, subject to revision by the City Engineer and the City Attorney, to ensure the construction contract is awarded in an efficient and timely manner. The Project plans and specifications are available in the City Engineer’s Office for review.

1. The City Council finds that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Class 1, and 15301(c) as repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing streets, sidewalks, gutters, and similar facilities; and

2. Approved the bid specifications and plans, subject to revisions required by the City Engineer and the City Attorney; and

3. Authorized and advertise for bids on the Citywide Concrete Repair Project. 9F. CITY SPONSORSHIP REQUEST – SAINT POLYCARP ANNUAL FIESTA Per the City’s Sponsorship Program, Saint Polycarp is requesting co-sponsorship of the St. Polycarp Family Fiesta scheduled for September 13-15, 2024.

1. The City Council declared this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, Section 15301c; and

2. Approved the St. Polycarp Fiesta sponsorship request.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 5 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
9G. RESOLUTION TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR THE YOUTH COMMUNITY

ACCESS GRANT PROGRAM
Staff is seeking approval of Resolution No. 2024-28, authorizing an application for the Youth Community Access Grant Program through the California Natural Resources Agency.

1. The City Council declared that this item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3); and

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2024-28, authorizing the application of funds for the Youth Outdoor Access Grant, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

STANTON AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR
THE YOUTH COMMUNITY ACCESS GRANT”; and

3. Authorized the Community Services Director to sign the Youth Community Access Grant Application for Funding.
9H. APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HASA, INC. DBA COMMERCIAL AQUATIC SERVICE At the City Council meeting on November 14, 2023, a contract valued at $10,000 was awarded to HASA, Inc. DBA Commercial Aquatic Services to provide professional splash pad maintenance services at Stanton Central Park and Harry M.

Dotson Park. To prepare both splash pads for operation this summer, several unanticipated repairs were required. The proposed First Amendment presented for the Council’s consideration extends the term of the Agreement to expire on November 30, 2025 and increases the total compensation to $60,000 to provide for routine maintenance and extraordinary maintenance.

1. The City Council finds that the recommended actions are exempt from CEQA per Section15378(b)(5) [Project does not include]: organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; and

2. Approved the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with HASA, Inc. DBA Commercial Aquatic Services and allowed the City Attorney to make minor edits as necessary prior to the execution of the Amendment; and

3. Authorized the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with HASA, Inc. DBA Commercial Aquatic Services.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 6 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
10A. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1144 AMENDING SECTION 20.400.030

OF THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE STANDARDS FOR

ALCOHOL SALES IN MIXED-USE OVERLAY AREAS
Applicant Jawdet Hanoun submitted a request to amend the Stanton Municipal Code in order to update regulations for alcohol sales in Mixed-Use projects.

Currently, the Zoning Code does not allow alcohol sales to be conducted in proximity to residential uses. This automatically prohibits the sale of alcohol in any commercial tenant space of a mixed-use project because residential and commercial uses are located on the same property. The applicant requested an amendment to introduce new regulations that would allow the sale of alcohol in mixed-use projects. The Planning Commission held a hearing on June 19, 2024 where they heard the request, along with a proposal for a new high-end neighborhood market and adopted Resolution No. 2566 recommending approval of Ordinance No. 1144. The Ordinance to amend Section 20.400.030 of the Stanton Municipal Code proposes to establish specific regulations to allow alcohol sales in mixed-use developments located in designated Mixed-Use Overlays or Mixed-Use Districts.

Staff report by Mr. Irving Anaya, Senior Planner.

The public hearing was opened.
• Mr. Joe Hanun, spoke in favor of the proposed amendments and in favor of applicant Jawdet Hanoun’s proposed project.
• Mr. Nicolas Dibbs, spoke regarding the City’s potential to earmark monies from proposed development projects for much needed youth programs and also to fund a youth advisory committee or commission.

No one else appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed.

Motion/Second: Warren/Taylor
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Taylor AYE
Council Member Torres AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Mayor Pro Tem Warren AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 7 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

1. The City Council conducted the public hearing and first reading of Ordinance No. 1144, entitled:
“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
STANTON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 20.400.030 OF

THE STANTON MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE

STANDARDS FOR ALCOHOL SALES IN MIXED-USE OVERLAY
AREAS”; and

2. Declared that the project is exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under section 15061(b)(3) which applies to projects that will not have a significant impact on the environment; and

3. Set August 27, 2024, as the date for second reading for adoption of Ordinance No. 1144.
10B. AN EXTENSION OF INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 36937 AND 65858 EXTENDING A

TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY NEW
MEDICAL SERVICES UNDER SMC SECTION 20.400.200, AND EXTENDING A

TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON ANY EXPANSION, ENLARGEMENT, AND/OR

ALTERATION OF ANY EXISTING MEDICAL SERVICES UNDER SMC SECTION

20.400.200 FOR 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS PENDING STUDY AND THE PREPARATION OF AN UPDATE TO THE CITY’S MUNICIPAL CODE AND

ZONING CODE AND DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
On July 9, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1145, establishing a 45-day moratorium on the establishment of medical services under Stanton Municipal Code (SMC) Section 20.400.200 and/or the expansion, enlargement, or alteration of such existing uses within the City. These facilities provide a valuable service; however, they can be associated with negative impacts on the vulnerable populations that they serve if not properly regulated. The City needs sufficient time to thoroughly study the issues and work on proposals to develop recommendations to appropriately update the City’s Municipal Code and Zoning regulations to address these issues. For this reason, the City Council is requested to consider an extension of the moratorium for a period of 10 months and 15 days beyond the original 45-day period of the Urgency Ordinance.

Staff report by Mr. Crystal Landavazo, Community Development Director.

The public hearing was opened.
• Mr. Nicolas Dibbs, spoke regarding the City’s potential to earmark monies for much needed youth programs, youth drug and alcohol prevention programs, and also to fund a youth advisory committee or commission.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 8 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
No one else appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed.

Motion/Second: Van/Torres
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Taylor AYE
Council Member Torres AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Mayor Pro Tem Warren AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council finds that adoption of the proposed Urgency Ordinance No. 1147 is:
a. Not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations) because it has no potential for resulting in physical change in the environment, directly or indirectly; and b. Exempt from the requirements of CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

2. Received and filed the 10-day action report for the conclusion of the 45-day moratorium; and

3. Adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1147, entitled:
“AN EXTENSION OF INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 6937 AND
65858 EXTENDING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY NEW MEDICAL SERVICES UNDER
SMC SECTION 20.400.200, AND EXTENDING A TEMPORARY

MORATORIUM ON ANY EXPANSION, ENLARGEMENT, AND/OR

ALTERATION OF ANY EXISTING MEDICAL SERVICES UNDER
SMC SECTION 20.400.200 FOR 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS

PENDING STUDY AND THE PREPARATION OF AN UPDATE TO
THE CITY’S MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING CODE AND
DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA.”

11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 9 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

12. NEW BUSINESS
12A. CONSIDER OPTING INTO A NATIONAL OPIOID SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

WITH KROGER
Consideration of opting into a multi-district federal settlement agreement with distributor of opioids, Kroger Co.

Staff report by Ms. HongDao Nguyen, City Attorney.

Motion/Second: Taylor/Torres
Motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 (Shawver, Taylor, Torres, Van, and Warren)
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion unanimously carried.

1. The City Council declared this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, Section 15301c; and

2. Opt. into the settlement agreement with Kroger Co. and allocate the City’s portion of the settlement funds to the County of Orange and directed the City Manager to execute any documents necessary to implement the action; and

3. Granted the City Manager authority to execute and enter into future agreements related to the nationwide opioid settlements.
12B. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SP PLUS FOR PARKING

ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
The City Council will consider entering into a Professional Services Agreement with SP Plus Corporation (SP+) for parking enforcement services.

Staff report by Ms. Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager.

Presentation by Mr. Ernesto Rennella, Vice President, SP Plus Corporation.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 10 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
Motion/Second: Shawver/Taylor
ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Taylor AYE
Council Member Torres AYE
Council Member Van AYE
Mayor Pro Tem Warren AYE
Mayor Shawver AYE
Motion unanimously carried:

1. The City Council finds that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Authorized the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement between the City and SP Plus Corporation for parking enforcement services in the amount of $213,087 for a term of one year with two additional one-year extensions.

13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS – PUBLIC
• Mr. Pablo Sierra, resident, spoke regarding safety concerns, growing homeless population occupying vacant properties/units, and the need for increased security within the Tina/Pacific neighborhood.
• Mr. Juan Gonzalez, resident, spoke regarding safety concerns, growing homeless population occupying vacant properties/units, issues with vandalism, and theft, and the need for increased security within the Tina/Pacific neighborhood.
• Mr. Nicolas Dibbs, spoke regarding the need for programs that can assist in and educate parents in protecting children, and also spoke regarding the creation of a youth advisory committee or commission.
• Ms. Marisol Sierra, resident, submitted a written comment on behalf of Eva Sierra, Pablo Sierra, Luz Lopez, Ricardo Almarez, Yesenia Segura, Gloria Linares, Florencio Salmeron, Teresa Martinez, Maribel Loyola, and Juliana Tlaseca regarding safety concerns, growing homeless population occupying vacant properties/units, issues with vandalism and theft, poor lighting, the need for increased security within the Tina/Pacific neighborhood, and requested assistance and safety resources from both the City and the Orange County Sheriff’s Department to keep them and their community safe.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 11 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
• Stanton Traphouse, submitted an e-public comment reporting their attempts in serving Nhu Van and Quong Van, whom per Stanton Traphouse are owners of an illegally operating Airbnb rental located on Cedar Avenue, Stanton. Stanton Traphouse further asks if Alyce Van would like to be served in the place of the previously mentioned owners and when they can perform the substitute service.

14. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None.

15. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN/COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED BUSINESS 15A. COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY ANNOUNCEMENTS • Mayor Pro Tem Warren reported on her attendance at the Orange County Fire Authority’s 2024 Best and Bravest Awards event, which was held on July 11, 2024.
• Council Member Taylor reported on his attendance at the Orange County Sheriff’s Department’s grand opening event of their new Orange County Sheriff’s Technology Center, which was held on June 27, 2024.
• Mayor Shawver reported on the City’s upcoming Movies Under the Stars event, which is scheduled to be held on July 26, 2024, at Stanton Central Park. 15B. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE COUNCIL

MEETING
• Mayor Pro Tem Warren requested to agendize a presentation to the City Council by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department pertaining to recently passed legislation and the strategies and objectives measures that are being taken to meet those changes within Stanton.
15C. COUNCIL/AGENCY/AUTHORITY INITIATED ITEMS FOR A FUTURE STUDY

SESSION
None.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 12 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING
15D. CITY COUNCIL INITIATED ITEM — DISCUSSION REGARDING PROTECTION OF THE CITY’S CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
At the July 9, 2024, City Council meeting, Mayor Shawver requested that this item be agendized for discussion. Mayor Shawver is requesting to discuss review of recently passed legislation and the measures needed to be taken to ensure for the protection of the City’s Critical Infrastructure.

Presentation by Mayor Shawver.

The City Council received consensus and directed staff to proceed with research and to bring this item back for City Council review at a future City Council meeting. 15E. CITY COUNCIL INITIATED ITEM — DISCUSSION REGARDING THE CREATION

OF A SOCIAL HOST ORDINANCE
At the July 9, 2024, City Council meeting, Mayor Shawver requested that this item be agendized for discussion. Mayor Shawver is requesting to discuss the creation of a social host ordinance pertaining to fireworks.

Presentation by Mayor Shawver.

The City Council received consensus and directed staff to proceed with research and to bring this item back for City Council review at a future City Council meeting.

16. ITEMS FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL/AUTHORITY COUNSEL None.

17. ITEMS FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Ms. Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager reminded the City Council that there would be no first meeting in August as the City Council will go dark for a summer recess and that the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting will be held on August 27, 2024.
17A. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
At this time the Orange County Sheriff’s Department will provide the City Council with an update on their current operations.

Captain Ryan C. Pierce provided the City Council with an update on their current operations.

DRAFT
Special and Joint Regular Meeting – July 23, 2024 - Page 13 of 13

THESE MINUTES ARE ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO

AMENDMENT AND APPROVAL AT NEXT MEETING

18. ADJOURNMENT in memory and honor of Mr. Bob Hall
Motion/Second: Shawver/
Motion carried at 8:02 p.m.
________________________________
DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________

CITY CLERK/SECRETARY
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: JUNE 2024 INVESTMENT REPORT
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of June 30, 2024, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of June 2024.

BACKGROUND:

Changes in the City’s cash and investment balances during the month of June are summarized below:

Between May 31, 2024, and June 30, 2024, the City’s total cash and investments decreased by approximately $1.3 million. During the month of June, the City paid approximately $1.1 million to contractors for the Premier Park Renovation Project (Task Code No. 2022-206) and Fiscal Year 2022/23 Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project (Task Code No. 2023-101).

The City’s cash and investment balances by fund type are presented in Attachment A. A summary of the City’s investment portfolio is included as Attachment B. The detail of the City’s investments by type that are managed by City staff are shown in Attachment C.

The detail of investments by type that are managed by Chandler Asset Management, LLC Beginning Balance Net Change Ending Balance
Cash and Investment Accounts (Pooled-All Funds) $ 71,896,056.44 $ (1,324,323.25) $ 70,571,733.19 Cash (Non-Pooled) 4,721,912.87 54,284.00 4,776,196.87
Total Cash and Investments $ 76,617,969.31 $ (1,270,039.25) $ 75,347,930.06 Item: 9D
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 (“Chandler”), of which staff determined provide a net advantage to the City, are shown in Attachment D.

ANALYSIS:

The monthly cash and investment report provides a summary of the cash and investment accounts held by the City as of the end of that month. In order to manage its cash and investments, the City combines cash resources from all funds into a single pool consisting of a variety of accounts and securities. The balance in the pooled cash account includes cash and certain liquid investments that are available to meet the City’s current cash needs. Cash in excess of the City’s current cash needs is invested in interest-bearing investments with various maturities.

As of June 30, 2024, the market value of the City’s total investment portfolio was $68.3 million, of which $42.0 million (62%) was managed by City staff and $26.3 million (38%) was managed by Chandler (Attachment B). Detailed information regarding the securities contained in the City’s investment portfolio is provided in Attachments C and D. As of June 30, 2024, City investments consisted of the following:

The City’s investment portfolio is well-diversified with investments spread across ten different security types. Likewise, the average maturity of the City’s portfolio (except for LAIF) is approximately 2.5 years, which is within the 3.5 years target in the City’s investment policy.

Investment Type
Market Value as o
June 30, 2024
Percentage of
Portfolio Invested
by Type
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Permitted by
Investment Policy In Compliance?
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) $ 40,816,405.69 59.77% 100.00% Yes U.S. Treasury Notes 8,235,039.06 12.06% 100.00% Yes
Corporate Notes 7,214,102.55 10.56% 30.00% Yes
Federal Agency Securities 4,814,580.99 7.05% 100.00% Yes Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 989,535.97 1.45% 30.00% Yes Asset Backed Securities 2,155,466.55 3.16% 20.00% Yes
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations 2,882,445.98 4.22% 20.00% Yes Municipal Bonds 204,376.80 0.30% 100.00% Yes
Supranational 841,274.54 1.23% 30.00% Yes
Money Market Fund/Cash 136,151.10 0.20% 20.00% Yes
Total Investments $ 68,289,379.23 100.00%
3 FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2023/24 Investment Policy. The portfolio will allow the City to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. Staff remains confident that the investment portfolio is currently positioned to remain secure and sufficiently liquid.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE:

Obj. No. 4: Ensure fiscal stability and efficiency in governance.

Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments Portfolio Summary
C. Investment Portfolio Detail (Managed by City Staff)
D. Investment Portfolio Detail (Managed by Chandler)
Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance (4) 101-various General Fund $ 40,638,344.54 $ 3,901,364.03 $ (6,866,180.78) $ 37,673,527.79 102-111101 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) (373,673.50) 1,739,788.96 (1,631,556.09) (265,440.63) 103-111101 PCTA Administration (7,046.98) 383.95 (4,928.01) (11,591.04) 104-111101 Public Benefit Fees Fund 23,291.38 1,849,091.69 - 1,872,383.07 105-111101 Beautification Fees Fund - 240,000.00 - 240,000.00 106-111101 Neighborhood Preservation Fees Fund - 114,000.00 - 114,000.00 107-111101 Cannabis Community Benefit Fees Fund 5,000.00 - - 5,000.00 210-111101 Certified Access Specialists (CASP) Program Fund 68,647.98 1,114.92 - 69,762.90 211-111101 Gas Tax Fund 2,404,340.97 201,368.98 (202,916.53) 2,402,793.42 215-111101 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation act (RMRA) Fund 1,641,477.32 178,848.63 (920,745.04) 899,580.91 220-111101 Measure M Fund 765,046.95 115,793.42 (265,512.41) 615,327.96 221-111101 Community Development Block Grant-CV (CDBG-CV) Fund (1,218.26) 131,606.00 (13,170.00) 117,217.74 222-111101 Community Development Block Grant Fund 221,029.22 970.23 (578.84) 221,420.61 223-111101 Protective Services Fund - 8,708.77 (4,734.25) 3,974.52 224-111101 Lighting Maintenance 1919 Act Fund 1,435,684.450 23,065.67 (30,933.93) 1,427,816.19 225-111101 Lighting/Median Maintenance 1972 Act Fund 829,986.170 17,122.42 (41,073.49) 806,035.10 226-111101 Air Quality Improvement Fund 126,385.740 14,381.76 (444.71) 140,322.79 227-111101 Other Grants Fund (156,032.850) 8,701.18 (212,193.43) (359,525.10) 242-111101 Supplemental Law Enforcement Grant Fund 312,810.610 1,372.90 (14,152.40) 300,031.11 245-111101 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Grant Fund (470.290) 321,762.85 (321,875.44) (582.88) 250-111101 Families and Communities Together (FaCT) Grant Fund (38,113.840) 69,734.99 (44,832.06) (13,210.91) 251-111101 Senior Transportation Fund 109,349.470 7,908.37 (8,980.26) 108,277.58 261-111101 Street Impact Fees Fund 243,692.100 2,118.09 (638.41) 245,171.78 262-111101 Traffic Signal Impact Fee 30,475.540 222.67 (79.74) 30,618.47 263-111101 Community Center Impact Fees Fund 278,302.210 1,516.43 (728.70) 279,089.94 264-111101 Police Services Impact Fees Fund 251,606.630 1,371.26 (658.80) 252,319.09 271-111101 Public Safety Task Force Fund (City Funds) 52,830.640 - (4,582.38) 48,248.26 280-111101 Stanton Central Park Maintenance Fund 11,905.780 5,397.92 (8,139.60) 9,164.10 285-various Stanton Housing Authority Fund 9,591,433.46 114,691.59 (318,684.67) 9,387,440.38 305-111101 Capital Projects Fund 32,472.07 1,911,281.41 (1,144,767.23) 798,986.25 310-111101 Park and Recreation Facilities Fund 4,027,659.31 28,463.62 (287,920.45) 3,768,202.48 501-111101 Sewer Maintenance Fund 7,734,689.21 57,579.52 (156,960.85) 7,635,307.88 502-111101 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund 14,802.84 60.72 (36.23) 14,827.33 602-111101 Workers' Compensation Fund 859,737.94 17,534.17 (8,437.75) 868,834.36 603-111101 Liability Risk Management Fund 27,987.03 8,368.00 (17,144.00) 19,211.03 604-111101 Employee Benefits Fund 169,417.61 170,643.18 (67,137.04) 272,923.75 605-111101 Fleet Maintenance Fund 562,391.22 18,030.43 (6,945.96) 573,475.69 801-111101 Expendable Deposits Fund 1,813.77 1,104.00 (2,126.50) 791.27

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED JUNE 30, 2024

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 2 ends

Click here to return to the agenda.

Fund/ Account
No. Fund/Account Name Beginning Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance (4)

CITY OF STANTON

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED JUNE 30, 2024
Total Pooled Cash and Investments(1) $ 71,896,056.44 $ 11,285,472.73 $ (12,609,795.98) $ 70,571,733.19 Less: Investments(1) $ (68,756,525.60) $ (234,486.72) $ 701,633.09 $ (68,289,379.23) Cash - BMO Bank General Checking Account $ 3,139,530.84 $ 11,050,986.01 $ (11,908,162.89) $ 2,282,353.96

CASH-NON-POOLED
xxx-111103 Payroll Account $ - $ 345,210.80 $ (345,210.80) $ - 101-111109 Flexible Spending/AFLAC 7,475.06 - (1,789.78) 5,685.28 101-111505 Petty Cash 600.00 - - 600.00
285-111403 Cash with Property Management Company (QMG) 44,603.58 25,531.68 (29,603.58) 40,531.68 604-111404 Cash with Fiscal Agent (PARS) (2) 4,669,234.23 62,394.37 (2,248.69) 4,729,379.91 Total Cash-Non-Pooled $ 4,721,912.87 $ 433,136.85 $ (378,852.85) $ 4,776,196.87

INVESTMENTS
POOLED ALL FUNDS $ 68,756,525.60 $ 234,486.72 $ (701,633.09) $ 68,289,379.23 Total Investments (3) $ 68,756,525.60 $ 234,486.72 $ (701,633.09) $ 68,289,379.23 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 76,617,969.31 $ 11,718,609.58 $ (12,988,648.83) $ 75,347,930.06 Notes:
(4) - The balance by fund as of June 30, 2024, is subject to change as the City completes its fiscal year end closing process. However, the total "Cash-BMO Bank General Checking Account" balance of $2,282,353.96 as of June 30, 2024, will not change. (3) - Additional information regarding the City's investments are included in Attachments B through D. (1) - Pooled cash includes: City's general checking and safekeeping accounts with BMO Harris Bank, the City's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) account, the Housing Authority's LAIF account, and the City's investment portfolio account with Chandler Asset Management. (2) - The Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) account is an irrevocable trust that can be used for pension and other post employment benefits only. This fund is excluded from the compliance requirements set forth in the City's investment policy.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 2 ends

Invested by City
Staff
$42.0M
62%
Invested by
Chandler
$26.3M
38%
Portfolio Summary
as of June 30, 2024
TOTAL = $68.3M

ATTACHMENT C ATTACHMENT D

ATTACHMENT B
Click here to return to the agenda.

Description CUSIP/Ticker Settlement Date YTM @ Cost Face Amount/Shares Cost Value Market Value Maturity Date Days To Maturity Accrued Interest % of Portfolio Evansville Teachers FCU IN 2.25 7/22/2024 299547AV1 7/22/2019 2.250 $ 249,000.00 $ 249,000.00 $ 248,516.94 7/22/2024 22 $ 76.75 0.59 First Tier Bank NE 1.95 8/23/2024 33766LAJ7 8/23/2019 1.950 $ 249,000.00 $ 249,000.00 $ 247,717.65 8/23/2024 54 $ 53.21 0.59 Raymond James Bank FL 2 8/23/2024 75472RAE1 8/23/2019 2.000 $ 247,000.00 $ 247,000.00 $ 245,703.25 8/23/2024 54 $ 1,691.78 0.58 Washington Federal Bank WA 1.95 8/28/2024 938828BN9 8/28/2019 1.950 $ 249,000.00 $ 249,000.00 $ 247,598.13 8/28/2024 59 $ 399.08 0.59 Sub Total / Average Certificates Of Deposit 2.070 $ 994,000.00 $ 994,000.00 $ 989,535.97 189 $ 2,691.53 2.93 Local Government Investment PoolLAIF | City LGIP LAIFCITY0895 2/29/2020 ? $ 31,604,005.81 $ 31,604,005.81 $ 31,487,577.97 N/A 1 $ 336,988.40 74.51 LAIF | Housing Authority LGIP LAIFHA0004 2/29/2020 ? $ 9,363,321.81 $ 9,363,321.81 $ 9,328,827.72 N/A 1 $ 103,455.56 22.08 Sub Total / Average Local Government
Investment Pool ? 40,967,327.62 $ 40,967,327.62 $ 40,816,405.69 $ 1 440,443.96 $ 96.59 Fort Bragg CA 1.871 8/1/2024 347028JZ6 9/18/2019 1.750 $ 205,000.00 $ 206,150.05 $ 204,376.80 8/1/2024 32 1,555.53 0.48 Sub Total / Average Municipal Bond 1.750 $ 205,000.00 $ 206,150.05 $ 204,376.80 32 1,555.53 0.48 Total / Average $ 42,166,327.62 $ 42,167,477.67 $ 42,010,318.46 2 444,691.02 100.00 Certificates Of DepositMunicipal BondCity of StantonPortfolio HoldingsMONTHLY Investment ReportReport Format: By TransactionGroup By: Security SectorAverage By: Face Amount / SharesPortfolio / Report Group: All PortfoliosAs of 6/30/2024 ATTACHMENT C Click here to return to the agenda.

MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT
City of Stanton | Account #10991 | As of June 30, 2024
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT | chandlerasset.com
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures at the end of the statement.

Chandler Team:

For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747, or contact [email protected]
Custodian:

US Bank

ATTACHMENT D

Page 1 of 9 ends

Click here to return to the agenda.

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Portfolio Characteristics
Sector Allocation
Performance Review
Account Summary
Maturity Distribution
Top Issuers
Credit Quality
Total Rate of Return 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS Since Inception (12/01/22)
City of Stanton 0.67% 0.84% 1.09% 4.66% -- -- -- -- 3.83% Benchmark Return* 0.70% 0.82% 0.81% 4.18% -- -- -- -- 3.28% Average Modified Duration 2.62
Average Coupon 3.71%
Average Purchase YTM 4.27%
Average Market YTM 4.87%
Average Quality AA
Average Final Maturity 3.06
Average Life 2.93
Beg. Values as of
06/01/2024
End Values as of
06/30/2024
Market Value 26,100,300.35 26,279,060.77
Accrued Interest 218,710.96 213,375.38
Total Market Value 26,319,011.31 26,492,436.15
Income Earned 81,489.37 52,203.34
Cont/WD 0.00 0.00
Par 26,835,354.49 26,918,204.09
Book Value 26,244,829.86 26,329,358.87
Cost Value 26,244,829.86 26,329,358.87
United States 31.34%
FHLMC 10.97%
Farm Credit System 10.45%
Federal Home Loan Banks 5.55%
FNMA 2.33%
John Deere Owner Trust 1.75%
American Express Credit Master Trust 1.73%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.64%
*Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index Secondary Benchmark:
*See Footnote
The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s’ and Fitch

ATTACHMENT D

Page 2 of 9 ends

RECONCILIATION SUMMARY
Accrual Activity Summary
Fair Market Activity Summary
Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date
(07/01/2023)
Beginning Book Value 26,244,829.86 25,439,791.50
Maturities/Calls 0.00 (700,000.00)
Principal Paydowns (44,078.33) (1,300,345.15)
Purchases 1,701,449.86 17,397,574.39
Sales (1,834,858.22) (14,595,208.81)
Change in Cash, Payables, Receivables 262,580.19 30,568.54 Amortization/Accretion 0.00 0.00
Realized Gain (Loss) (564.49) 56,978.40
Ending Book Value 26,329,358.87 26,329,358.87
Month to Date Fiscal Year to Date
(07/01/2023)
Beginning Market Value 26,100,300.35 25,168,129.35
Maturities/Calls 0.00 (700,000.00)
Principal Paydowns (44,078.33) (1,300,345.15)
Purchases 1,701,449.86 17,397,574.39
Sales (1,834,858.22) (14,595,208.81)
Change in Cash, Payables, Receivables 262,580.19 30,568.54 Amortization/Accretion 0.00 0.00
Change in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) 94,231.41 221,364.06 Realized Gain (Loss) (564.49) 56,978.40
Ending Market Value 26,279,060.77 26,279,060.77
Maturities / Calls
Month to Date 0.00
Fiscal Year to Date (700,000.00)
Principal Paydowns
Month to Date (44,078.33)
Fiscal Year to Date (1,300,345.15)
Purchases
Month to Date 1,701,449.86
Fiscal Year to Date 17,397,574.39
Sales
Month to Date (1,834,858.22)
Fiscal Year to Date (14,595,208.81)
Interest Received
Month to Date 52,832.13
Fiscal Year to Date 812,147.08
Purchased / Sold Interest
Month to Date 4,706.79
Fiscal Year to Date 18,833.20

ATTACHMENT D

Page 3 of 9 ends

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
43815PAC3 HAROT 2022-2 A3 3.73
07/20/2026 312,128.14 09/21/20224.08%
308,226.54
308,226.54

98.78 5.26%
308,325.83
420.42

1.17%

99.29 NA/AAA
AAA

2.05 0.83
89238FAD5 TAOT 2022-B A3 2.93
09/15/2026 244,533.70 09/13/20223.53%
239,089.00
239,089.00

98.46 4.91%
240,768.91
318.44

0.92%
1,679.90
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.21 0.82
02582JJT8 AMXCA 2022-2 A 05/17/2027 350,000.00 09/13/2022

4.14%
343,382.81
343,382.81

98.21 5.54%
343,735.00
527.33

1.31%
352.19
NA/AAA
AAA

0.87 0.92
47800BAC2 JDOT 2022-C A3 5.09
06/15/2027 95,000.00 10/12/2022

5.09%
94,992.63
94,992.63

99.64 5.50%
94,660.76
214.91

0.36%
(331.87)
Aaa/NA
AAA

2.96 1.05
58770JAD6 MBALT 2024-A A3 5.32
01/18/2028 70,000.00 05/17/20245.32%
69,991.81
69,991.81
100.29

5.25%
70,200.44
165.51

0.27%
208.63
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.55 2.00
47787CAC7 JDOT 2023-C A3 5.48
05/15/2028 300,000.00 12/05/20235.15%
303,117.19
303,117.19
100.32

5.40%
300,970.83
730.67

1.15%
(2,146.36)
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.88 2.01
161571HT4 CHAIT 2023-1 A 5.16 09/15/2028 280,000.00 09/07/2023

5.17%
279,922.38
279,922.38
100.26

5.11%
280,714.78
642.13

1.07%
792.40
NR/AAA
AAA

4.21 2.03
448973AD9 HART 2024-A A3 4.99
02/15/2029 85,000.00 03/11/20245.00%
84,981.26
84,981.26

99.63 5.24%
84,687.45
188.51

0.32%
(293.81)
NA/AAA
AAA

4.63 2.05
096919AD7 BMWOT 2024-A A3 5.18
02/26/2029 120,000.00 06/04/20245.18%
119,981.77
119,981.77
100.10

5.21%
120,118.55
345.33

0.46%
136.78
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.66 2.10
47786WAD2 JDOT 2024-B A3 5.2 03/15/2029 65,000.00 06/11/2024

5.20%
64,987.29
64,987.29
100.31

5.14%
65,200.82
122.06

0.25%
213.53
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.71 2.32
02582JKH2 AMXCA 2024-1 A 5.23
04/16/2029 110,000.00 04/16/20245.23%
109,977.45
109,977.45
100.94

4.99%
111,029.64
255.69

0.42%
1,052.19
NA/AAA
AAA

4.79 2.53
05522RDJ4 BACCT 2024-1 A 4.93
03/15/2029 135,000.00 06/06/20244.93%
134,992.43
134,992.43
100.04

4.99%
135,053.54
332.78

0.51%

61.11 Aaa/AAA
NA

4.71 2.61
Total ABS 2,166,661.84 4.65%
2,153,642.56
2,153,642.56

99.49 5.24%
2,155,466.55
4,263.78

8.20%
1,823.99
Aaa/AAA
AAA

3.14 1.57
AGENCY
3133ENP95 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.25 09/30/2025 650,000.00 09/23/20224.31% 648,875.50
648,875.50

99.18 4.93%
644,668.79
6,982.99

2.45%
(4,206.71)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.25 1.19
3135G0Q22 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 1.875 09/24/2026 650,000.00 09/14/20223.73% 605,208.50
605,208.50

94.04 4.72%
611,281.66
3,283.85

2.33%
6,073.16
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.24 2.14
3133ERFJ5 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.5 05/20/2027 450,000.00 05/23/20244.80%
446,330.25
446,330.25

99.71 4.61%
448,690.38
2,306.25

1.71%
2,360.13
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.89 2.67

ATTACHMENT D

Page 4 of 9 ends

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3130ATS57 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5
03/10/2028 500,000.00 03/22/20234.04%
510,315.00
510,315.00

99.88 4.53%
499,386.52
6,937.50

1.90%
(10,928.49)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.70 3.32
3133EPGW9

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT
BANKS FUNDING CORP 3.875
04/25/2028
250,000.00 04/24/2023

3.76%
251,255.00
251,255.00

97.93 4.47%
244,816.26
1,776.04

0.93%
(6,438.74)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.82 3.48
3130AWTR1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.375 09/08/2028 300,000.00 09/13/2023

4.48%
298,555.11
298,555.11

99.66 4.46%
298,992.03
4,119.79

1.14%
436.92
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.19 3.74
3133EPWK7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.5 09/22/2028 500,000.00 09/25/20234.67%
496,185.00
496,185.00
100.16

4.46%
500,795.23
6,187.50

1.91%
4,610.23
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.23 3.77
3130AXQK7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.75 12/08/2028 650,000.00 12/07/2023

4.18%
666,646.50
666,646.50
101.38

4.40%
658,992.49
1,972.57

2.51%
(7,654.01)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.44 3.96
3133ERAK7

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT
BANKS FUNDING CORP 4.375
04/10/2029
400,000.00 04/08/2024

4.48%
398,068.00
398,068.00

99.92 4.39%
399,693.04
3,937.50

1.52%
1,625.04
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.78 4.23
3133ERDH1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.75 04/30/2029 500,000.00 05/08/2024

4.55%
504,355.00
504,355.00
101.45

4.41%
507,264.60
4,024.31

1.93%
2,909.60
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.83 4.25
Total Agency 4,850,000.00 4.30%
4,825,793.86
4,825,793.86

99.32 4.56%
4,814,580.99
41,528.30

18.32%
(11,212.87)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.51 3.17

AGENCY CMBS
3137BTUM1 FHMS K-061 A2 3.347
11/25/2026 345,391.15 09/22/20224.23%
332,992.15
332,992.15

96.14 5.10%
332,041.88
963.35

1.26%
(950.26)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.41 2.13
3137BVZ82 FHMS K-063 A2 3.43 01/25/2027 350,000.00 09/13/2022

3.91%
342,412.11
342,412.11

96.36 4.98%
337,254.51
1,000.42

1.28%
(5,157.61)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.57 2.27
3137F2LJ3 FHMS K-066 A2 3.117
06/25/2027 350,000.00 09/13/2022

3.88%
337,640.63
337,640.63

95.14 4.92%
332,982.72
909.13

1.27%
(4,657.91)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.99 2.66
3137FAWS3 FHMS K-067 A2 3.194
07/25/2027 310,000.00 09/22/20224.19%
295,856.25
295,856.25

95.15 4.90%
294,970.33
825.12

1.12%
(885.92)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.07 2.80
3137FBU79 FHMS K-069 A2 3.187
09/25/2027 500,000.00 05/18/20234.13%
480,292.97
480,292.97

95.02 4.89%
475,080.60
1,327.92

1.81%
(5,212.37)
Aaa/AAA
AA+

3.24 2.89
3137FG6X8 FHMS K-077 A2 3.85 05/25/2028 510,000.00 05/24/2023

4.20%
500,636.72
500,636.72

96.44 4.85%
491,845.43
1,636.25

1.87%
(8,791.29)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

3.90 3.46
3137FKUP9 FHMS K-087 A2 3.771
12/25/2028 400,000.00 06/05/20244.64%
384,812.50
384,812.50

95.88 4.80%
383,500.16
1,257.00

1.46%
(1,312.34)
Aaa/AAA
AA+

4.49 3.95
3137FLYV0 FHMS K-092 A2 3.298
04/25/2029 250,000.00 05/30/20244.85%
232,578.13
232,578.13

93.91 4.73%
234,770.35
687.08

0.89%
2,192.22
Aaa/AA+
AAA

4.82 4.28

ATTACHMENT D

Page 5 of 9 ends

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
Total Agency
CMBS 3,015,391.15 4.23%
2,907,221.46
2,907,221.46

95.60 4.90%
2,882,445.98
8,606.26

10.97%
(24,775.48)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

3.43 3.04
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 31,490.38 --

0.00%
31,490.38
31,490.38

1.00 0.00%
31,490.38

0.00 0.12%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Cash 31,490.38 0.00%
31,490.38
31,490.38

1.00 0.00%
31,490.38

0.00 0.12%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00

CORPORATE
808513BB0 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP 4.2
03/24/2025 250,000.00 09/16/20224.37%
249,015.00
249,015.00

99.00 5.60%
247,498.52
2,829.17

0.94%
(1,516.48)
A2/AA0.73

0.70 756109AV6 REALTY INCOME CORP 3.875
04/15/2025 250,000.00 09/13/20224.47%
246,425.00
246,425.00

98.63 5.66%
246,583.29
2,045.14

0.94%
158.29
A3/AWR0.79

0.76 14913R2V8 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL
SERVICES CORP 3.4 05/13/2025 125,000.00 09/21/20224.39% 121,940.00
121,940.00

98.36 5.35%
122,947.48
566.67

0.47%
1,007.48
A2/A
A+

0.87 0.84
06368D3S1 BANK OF MONTREAL 3.7
06/07/2025 350,000.00 09/13/20224.50%
342,912.50
342,912.50

98.28 5.60%
343,996.32
863.33

1.31%
1,083.82
A2/AAA0.94

0.90 63743HFE7

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES

COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP

3.45 06/15/2025
250,000.00 09/19/2022

4.42%
243,805.00
243,805.00

98.06 5.56%
245,138.55
383.33

0.93%
1,333.55
A2/AA0.96

0.92 91324PCP5 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 3.75
07/15/2025 125,000.00 09/21/20224.36%
122,981.25
122,981.25

98.51 5.23%
123,142.27
2,161.46

0.47%
161.02
A2/A+
A

1.04 0.99
89236TKF1 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP

3.65 08/18/2025 350,000.00 09/13/20224.23%
344,498.00
344,498.00

98.18 5.32%
343,623.14
4,719.65

1.31%
(874.86)
A1/A+
A+

1.13 1.08
24422EWJ4 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.05
09/08/2025 125,000.00 09/21/2022

4.36%
123,933.75
123,933.75

98.63 5.25%
123,283.49
1,589.06

0.47%
(650.26)
A1/A
A+

1.19 1.13
713448FQ6 PEPSICO INC 4.55 02/13/2026 65,000.00 02/13/2023

4.57%
64,962.30
64,962.30

99.33 4.99%
64,561.77
1,133.71

0.25%
(400.53)
A1/A+
NA

1.62 1.52
46647PCZ7 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.08
04/26/2026 200,000.00 09/13/20224.57%
195,980.00
195,980.00

98.67 6.27%
197,341.38
1,473.33

0.75%
1,361.38
A1/AAA1.82

0.79 61747YET8 MORGAN STANLEY 4.679
07/17/2026 200,000.00 09/13/20224.61%
199,302.00
199,302.00

99.02 6.32%
198,039.91
4,263.09

0.75%
(1,262.09)
A1/AA+2.05

0.99 06051GLA5 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 4.827
07/22/2026 200,000.00 09/13/20224.73%
199,336.00
199,336.00

99.04 6.42%
198,071.72
4,263.85

0.75%
(1,264.28)
A1/AAA2.06

1.00 ATTACHMENT D

Page 6 of 9 ends

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
06406RBJ5 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORP 4.414 07/24/2026 350,000.00 --4.35%
348,501.00
348,501.00

98.88 6.09%
346,068.44
6,737.48

1.32%
(2,432.56)
A1/A
AA2.071.01
74340XBK6 PROLOGIS LP 3.25 10/01/2026 250,000.00 09/14/2022

4.30%
240,397.50
240,397.50

95.90 5.20%
239,762.33
2,031.25

0.91%
(635.18)
A3/A
WR

2.25 2.12
26442CAS3 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC

2.95 12/01/2026 250,000.00 09/16/20224.31%
237,035.00
237,035.00

95.27 5.05%
238,184.07
614.58

0.91%
1,149.07
Aa3/A
WR

2.42 2.29
857477CL5 STATE STREET CORP 4.993
03/18/2027 300,000.00 03/13/20244.99%
300,000.00
300,000.00

99.88 5.04%
299,637.20
4,285.66

1.14%
(362.80)
A1/A
AA2.712.48
46647PCB0 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.578
04/22/2027 250,000.00 09/15/2022

4.95%
221,377.50
221,377.50

93.32 5.77%
233,302.10
756.13

0.89%
11,924.60
A1/AAA2.81

1.74 91324PEG3 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 3.7
05/15/2027 250,000.00 09/13/20224.21%
244,607.50
244,607.50

96.77 4.92%
241,930.35
1,181.94

0.92%
(2,677.15)
A2/A+
A

2.87 2.67
89115A2C5 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK

4.108 06/08/2027 200,000.00 09/13/20224.73%
194,794.00
194,794.00

97.05 5.20%
194,096.89
524.91

0.74%
(697.11)
A1/A
NA

2.94 2.72
61747YEC5 MORGAN STANLEY 1.512
07/20/2027 250,000.00 09/15/20224.69%
219,305.00
219,305.00

92.45 5.70%
231,125.98
1,690.50

0.88%
11,820.98
A1/AA+3.05

1.96 06051GJS9 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.734
07/22/2027 250,000.00 09/15/20224.86%
219,722.50
219,722.50

92.69 5.79%
231,731.39
1,914.63

0.88%
12,008.89
A1/AAA3.06

1.96 78016FZS6 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 4.24
08/03/2027 200,000.00 09/13/20224.73%
195,794.00
195,794.00

97.30 5.20%
194,600.34
3,486.22

0.74%
(1,193.66)
A1/A
AA3.092.80
14913R3A3 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL
SERVICES CORP 3.6 08/12/2027 250,000.00 09/13/20224.27% 242,635.00
242,635.00

96.24 4.91%
240,612.13
3,475.00

0.92%
(2,022.87)
A2/A
A+

3.12 2.86
023135BC9 AMAZON.COM INC 3.15
08/22/2027 250,000.00 09/14/20224.17%
238,730.00
238,730.00

94.95 4.90%
237,383.90
2,821.88

0.90%
(1,346.10)
A1/AA
AA3.152.91
24422EWK1 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.15
09/15/2027 250,000.00 09/13/20224.29%
248,480.00
248,480.00

97.81 4.89%
244,521.62
3,054.86

0.93%
(3,958.38)
A1/A
A+

3.21 2.93
74456QBU9 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND
GAS CO 3.7 05/01/2028 300,000.00 09/06/20235.10%
282,837.00
282,837.00

95.75 4.93%
287,256.26
1,850.00

1.09%
4,419.26
A1/A
WR

3.84 3.50
58933YBH7 MERCK & CO INC 4.05
05/17/2028 300,000.00 --4.08%
299,617.50
299,617.50

97.90 4.65%
293,690.71
1,485.00

1.12%
(5,926.79)
A1/A+
NA

3.88 3.53
89115A2U5 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK

5.523 07/17/2028 200,000.00 12/18/20234.89%
205,150.00
205,150.00
101.24

5.18%
202,484.76
5,032.07

0.77%
(2,665.24)
A1/A
AA4.053.51
69371RS80 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.6
01/31/2029 365,000.00 01/24/20244.64%
364,405.05
364,405.05

98.90 4.87%
360,998.17
7,042.47

1.37%
(3,406.88)
A1/A+
NA

4.59 4.01
17275RBR2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.85
02/26/2029 140,000.00 02/21/2024

4.86%
139,951.00
139,951.00

99.98 4.85%
139,975.30
2,357.64

0.53%

24.30 A1/AANA4.66

4.06 ATTACHMENT D

Page 7 of 9 ends

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
341081GT8 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO

5.15 06/15/2029 300,000.00 06/13/20244.82%
304,159.46
304,159.46
100.84

4.96%
302,512.79
1,201.67

1.15%
(1,646.67)
Aa2/A+
AA4.964.19
Total Corporate 7,395,000.00 4.54%
7,202,589.81
7,202,589.81

97.60 5.34%
7,214,102.55
77,835.67

27.45%
11,512.74
A1/A
A+

2.59 2.16

MONEY MARKET
FUND
31846V203 FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y 104,660.72 --

4.92%
104,660.72
104,660.72

1.00 4.92%
104,660.72

0.00 0.40%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Money
Market Fund 104,660.72 4.92%
104,660.72
104,660.72

1.00 4.92%
104,660.72

0.00 0.40%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00

SUPRANATIONAL
459058KT9

INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPM 3.5 07/12/2028
225,000.00 08/17/2023

4.55%
214,688.25
214,688.25

96.35 4.50%
216,796.71
3,696.88

0.82%
2,108.46
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.03 3.65
45950KDD9 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP

4.5 07/13/2028 230,000.00 07/06/20234.53%
229,744.70
229,744.70
100.04

4.49%
230,087.20
4,830.00

0.88%
342.50
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.04 3.58
4581X0EN4

INTER-AMERICAN
DEVELOPMENT BANK 4.125
02/15/2029
400,000.00 03/14/2024

4.39%
395,324.00
395,324.00

98.60 4.46%
394,390.63
6,920.83

1.50%
(933.37)
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.63 4.09
Total
Supranational 855,000.00 4.47%
839,756.95
839,756.95

98.41 4.48%
841,274.54
15,447.71

3.20%
1,517.59
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.31 3.84

US TREASURY
91282CFE6 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
08/15/2025 650,000.00 09/13/2022

3.75%
638,802.74
638,802.74

97.90 5.06%
636,365.24
7,645.09

2.42%
(2,437.50)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.13 1.08
91282CFK2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
09/15/2025 650,000.00 09/19/2022

3.90%
642,712.89
642,712.89

98.20 5.05%
638,294.92
6,676.63

2.43%
(4,417.97)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.21 1.15
9128286L9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25
03/31/2026 650,000.00 09/14/20223.75%
617,880.86
617,880.86

95.75 4.81%
622,375.00
3,676.23

2.37%
4,494.14
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.75 1.68
9128287B0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.875
06/30/2026 650,000.00 09/15/20223.78%
606,632.81
606,632.81

94.64 4.71%
615,164.06

33.12 2.34%
8,531.25
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.00 1.93

ATTACHMENT D

Page 8 of 9 ends

HOLDINGS REPORT
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase Date
Purchase Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
9128282A7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.5
08/15/2026 650,000.00 09/13/20223.72%
597,923.83
597,923.83

93.58 4.71%
608,257.81
3,669.64

2.31%
10,333.98
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.13 2.04
91282CEF4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.5
03/31/2027 650,000.00 09/14/20223.66%
618,591.80
618,591.80

94.79 4.54%
616,103.51
4,084.70

2.34%
(2,488.29)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.75 2.60
91282CFH9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
08/31/2027 650,000.00 09/13/20223.57%
636,822.26
636,822.26

95.94 4.51%
623,593.75
6,789.23

2.37%
(13,228.51)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.17 2.94
91282CGC9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
12/31/2027 350,000.00 01/24/20233.59%
354,470.70
354,470.70

98.08 4.47%
343,287.11

36.85 1.31%
(11,183.59)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.50 3.23
91282CGH8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
01/31/2028 500,000.00 02/22/2023

4.12%
486,269.53
486,269.53

96.85 4.46%
484,238.28
7,307.69

1.84%
(2,031.25)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.59 3.27
91282CGT2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
03/31/2028 350,000.00 04/24/20233.61%
350,259.77
350,259.77

97.19 4.45%
340,156.25
3,189.21

1.29%
(10,103.52)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.75 3.43
91282CHE4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
05/31/2028 500,000.00 06/22/20234.02%
491,308.59
491,308.59

97.15 4.42%
485,761.72
1,535.18

1.85%
(5,546.87)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.92 3.59
91282CHK0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
06/30/2028 500,000.00 09/20/20234.51%
489,179.69
489,179.69

98.48 4.42%
492,402.35

54.35 1.87%
3,222.66
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.00 3.65
91282CHQ7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
07/31/2028 350,000.00 08/24/20234.39%
345,953.13
345,953.13

98.94 4.41%
346,294.92
6,028.85

1.32%
341.79
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.08 3.66
91282CJA0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
09/30/2028 350,000.00 10/18/20234.89%
345,912.11
345,912.11
100.85

4.40%
352,966.80
4,068.99

1.34%
7,054.69
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.25 3.78
91282CJR3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.75
12/31/2028 400,000.00 01/22/20244.00%
395,468.75
395,468.75

97.45 4.38%
389,781.25

40.76 1.48%
(5,687.50)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.50 4.09
91282CJW2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
01/31/2029 650,000.00 02/12/20244.14%
646,013.67
646,013.67

98.46 4.37%
639,996.10
10,857.14

2.44%
(6,017.57)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.59 4.07
Total US Treasury 8,500,000.00 3.93%
8,264,203.13
8,264,203.13

96.92 4.61%
8,235,039.06
65,693.66

31.34%
(29,164.07)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.97 2.74
Total Portfolio 26,918,204.09 4.27%
26,329,358.87
26,329,358.87

97.16 4.87%
26,279,060.77
213,375.38
100.00%
(50,298.10)
Aa2/AAAA3.06

2.62 Total Market
Value + Accrued 26,492,436.15

ATTACHMENT D

Page 9 of 9 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Successor Agency DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: JUNE 2024 INVESTMENT REPORT (SUCCESSOR AGENCY) REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Investment Report as of June 30, 2024, has been prepared in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the Investment Report for the month of June 2024.

BACKGROUND:

The attached report summarizes the Successor Agency’s investment and deposit balances as of June 2024. During the month of June, the Successor Agency’s total cash and investments decreased by approximately $997,677. During the month of June, the Successor Agency paid its semi-annual interest payments on its outstanding debt obligations. The Successor Agency’s cash and investment balances by fund are presented in Attachment A. The Successor Agency’s investments and deposits by financial institution are included as Attachment B.

ANALYSIS:

The Successor Agency’s share of the City’s investment in the State Treasurer’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) continues to be available on demand. The effective yield on LAIF for the month of June 2024 was 4.48%.

Item: 9E
Click here to return to the agenda.
1 The Successor Agency’s investments are shown on Attachment B and have a weighted investment yield of 4.48%, which is equal to the benchmark LAIF return of 4.48%, as the entire portfolio (excluding funds held with the bond fiscal agents) represents the Successor Agency’s portion of the City’s pooled cash and investments. With a completely liquid portfolio, the weighted average maturity of the Successor Agency’s investments on June 30, 2024, was 1 day. LAIF’s average maturity on June 30, 2024, was approximately 224 days.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All deposits and investments have been made in accordance with the City's Fiscal Year 2023/24 Investment Policy.

The portfolio will allow the Successor Agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the agenda posting process.

Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
B. Investments and Deposits
Fund/
Account No. Fund/Account Name
Beginning
Balance Increases Decreases Ending Balance

CASH-POOLED
712-111101 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund $ 3,784,014.13 $ - $ (2,370,151.87) $ 1,413,862.26 Total Cash-Pooled (1) $ 3,784,014.13 $ - $ (2,370,151.87) $ 1,413,862.26 CASH-RESTRICTED (with Fiscal Agent)
712-111423 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A and B $ 712,835.74 $ 712,817.28 $ (260,325.00) $ 1,165,328.02 712-111425 2016 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series C and D 1,235,981.13 1,235,949.12 (595,962.50) 1,875,967.75 712-111426 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series A 415,406.26 415,395.50 (135,400.00) 695,401.76 Total Cash-Restricted (with Fiscal Agent) $ 2,364,223.13 $ 2,364,161.90 $ (991,687.50) $ 3,736,697.53 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 6,148,237.26 $ 2,364,161.90 $ (3,361,839.37) $ 5,150,559.79 Note:
(1) - Includes the Successor Agency's share of the City's BMO Harris Bank checking account and Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

CASH AND INVESTMENTS REPORT
MONTH ENDED JUNE 30, 2024
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE STANTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

INVESTMENTS AND DEPOSITS
Investment Issuer/ Date of Market MV
Type Institution Broker Maturity Cost Value Source
LAIF and BMO General Acct State of California/ BMO State of California On Demand 4.48% N/A $ 1,413,862 $ 1,413,862 LAIF Total Cash Investments and Deposits 1 4.48% $ 1,413,862 $ 1,413,862 Weighted Average Weighted Average
Bond Funds Held by Trustees: Maturity (days) Yield
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturity Rate Value Cost Value Source 2016 Series A and BDebt Service:Cash Equivalents US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1,165,327 $ $ 1,165,327 $ 1,165,327 US Bank Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Total 2016 Series A and B $ 1,165,328 $ 1,165,328
Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturit
y Rate
Value Cost
Value Source
2016 Series C and DDebt Service:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1,875,967 $ $ 1,875,967 $ 1,875,967 US Bank Principal: Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 1 1 1 US Bank Total 2016 Series C and D $ 1,875,968 $ 1,875,968
MONTH ENDED JUNE 30, 2024
Rate
Interest

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1 of 2 ends

Investment Issuer/ CUSIP Date of Interest Par Market MV Type Institution Broker Number Maturity Rate Value Cost Value Source 2020 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Special Fund:Cash Equivalent US Bank Money Market US Bank 9AMMF05B2 On Demand 0.02% 695,402 $ $ 695,402 $ US Bank 695,402 Total 2020 Tax Allocation Bonds (Tax-Exempt) $ 695,402 $ 695,402 Total Bond Fund Investments and Deposits (3) $ 3,736,698 3,736,698 $ TOTAL - ALL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $5,150,560 $5,150,560 Notes:
(1) - There have been no exceptions to the Investment Policy. (2) - The Successor Agency is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. (3) - Restricted Bond Funds are held by the fiscal agent.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 2 of 2 ends

1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: JUNE 2024 GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT; HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE
REPORT; STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the month ended June 30, 2024, has been provided to the City Manager in accordance with Stanton Municipal Code Section

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

2. Receive and file the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund June 2024 Revenue and Expenditure Reports and Status of Capital Improvement Projects for the month ended June 30, 2024.

ANALYSIS:

General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachments A and B summarize the General Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through June 30, 2024. The reports include information for the month of June, on a year-to-date basis through June, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through June) is included as well.

Item: 9F
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 As of June 30, total General Fund revenues received to date were approximately $33.1 million, which is 100% of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 budgeted amount and is approximately $1.4 million (5%) higher than the revenues recognized for the same period last year (Attachment A, page 2), primarily due to the following:
• $1,115,916 of cannabis tax revenue collected for the first time during the current fiscal year; and
• $695,142 is due to the early loan repayment received from the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Fund approved by the City Council with the Fiscal Year 2023/24 mid-year budget adjustments approved in February.

Total General Fund expenditures were approximately $32.2 million through June 30, which represents 91% of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 projected expenditures and is approximately $10.6 million (49%) higher than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year (Attachment B, page 2). The General Fund’s Fiscal Year 2023/24 Amended Budget includes $3.5 million in special projects that were funded by the City’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund in Fiscal Year 2022/23. The City spent approximately $1.7 million of these special project costs through June 30, 2024. Other significant fluctuations include:
• $1.8 million was transferred to the new funds established in June (#104 Public Benefit Fee Fund; #105 Beautification Fee Fund; and #106 Neighborhood Preservation Fee Fund) as approved by the City Council on June 11, 2024 • $7.2 million in contracted law enforcement contract costs due to the reallocation of the City’s Fiscal Year 2022/23 contracted law enforcement costs that were funded by the City’s ARPA Fund.

Per Attachment C, the City’s General Fund reserves and available fund balance (“discretionary fund balance”) is estimated to be $33.6 million by June 30, 2024, as shown in the table below.

Estimated
Balance
at 6/30/24
Set aside per Reserve Policy $ 14,400,000
Assigned Fund Balance 2,762,092
Unassigned Fund Balance 16,448,159
Total Discretionary Fund Balance $ 33,610,251
Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditure Reports
Attachment D summarizes the Housing Authority Fund’s revenue and expenditure activity through June 30, 2024. The report includes information on the activity during the 3 month of June, information on a year-to-date basis through June, the current fiscal year’s budgeted balance and the year-to-date as a percentage of the budget. In addition, for comparison purposes, the year-to-date amount, final amount, and a percentage of final for the previous fiscal year (through June) is included as well.

As of June 30, total Housing Authority Fund revenues received to date were approximately $1.1 million, which is 123% of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 budgeted amount and is $197,727 (21%) more than the revenue collected through the same period last year due to the additional investment income earned from higher interest rates. Rental income from the Tina Pacific properties is down $48,254 (7%) from the previous fiscal year because the previous fiscal year’s revenue included additional revenue collected for delinquent balances from the COVID-19 period and some residents have begun relocating from the property.

Total Housing Authority Fund expenditures were approximately $1.6 million through June 30, which is 28% of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 budget and $1.9 million (62%) lower than the expenditures incurred for the same period last year, primarily due to the $2.5 million payment for the Riveria Motel Project Homekey project that was made last year.

Per Attachment E, the City’s Housing Authority Fund’s available fund balance is expected to be $5.3 million by June 30, 2024.

Status of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) (Attachment F) The Fiscal Year 2023/24 CIP budget includes $7.0 million from the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Adopted Budget, $12.7 million in carryover funding from Fiscal Year 2022/23, and $50,009 in additional appropriations approved by City Council since July 1, 2023, for a total amended budget of $19.8 million as of June 30, 2024. As of June 30, capital project expenditures totaled $4.1 million (21% of the amended budget) with an additional $1.8 million (9% of the amended budget) under contract (encumbered) for work currently underway, for a total amount spent or encumbered to date of $5.9 million (30% of the amended budget) as of June 30, 2024.

The following projects were complete as of June 30, 2024:
• Fiscal Year 2022/23 Catch Basin Connector Pipe Screen Installations Project (#2023-103)
• Cerritos Avenue Resurfacing Project (#2024-102)
• Park Master Plan (#2021-201)
• Family Resource Center Improvements, Phase 1 (#2022-201) • Replace Shade Structure at Stanton Central Park (#2022-205) • Stanton Park Adult Fitness Equipment (#2022-820)
• Stanford Avenue Storm Drain Repair (#2024-802)
In addition, the Stanton Central Park Lighting Project (#2024-601) was canceled. The Public Works Department is working with the granting agency to reallocate the grant funding (from Energy Efficiency Community Grant Program) to another project. 4 Lastly, the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Annual Sewer Rehabilitation Project (#2024-301) was also canceled due to the ongoing Sewer Master Plan Update project. The Fiscal Year 2024/25 Adopted Budget includes new funding for a sewer rehabilitation project.

Collectively, the completed and canceled capital improvement projects will result in over $900,000 of budget savings being returned to the various funds that were allocated to fund these projects to be available for future appropriation when needed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda posting process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES:

Obj. No. 3: Provide a quality infrastructure.

Obj. No. 4: Ensure fiscal stability and efficiency in governance.

Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. June 2024 General Fund Revenues
B. June 2024 General Fund Expenditures
C. General Fund Reserve Balances
D. June 2024 Housing Authority Revenue and Expenditures E. Housing Authority Reserve Balance
F. Status of Capital Improvement Projects as of June 30, 2024 %
FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year
TAXES
Property Tax $ 8,585,900 $ 8,695,550 $ 54,710 $ 8,899,916 102.35% 8,281,642 $ 7.47% Sales and Use Tax 5,471,900 5,376,730 980,247 4,980,597 92.63% 5,321,610 ‐6.41% Transactions and Use Tax 6,154,000 6,129,470 1,054,139 5,652,312 92.22% 6,958,521 ‐18.77% Transient Occupancy Tax 673,600 625,000 109,754 617,090 98.73% 671,096 ‐8.05% Franchise Fees 1,157,000 1,341,470 189,443 1,271,101 94.75% 1,296,456 ‐1.96% Business Licenses 158,000 158,000 7,971 172,969 109.47% 162,677 6.33%Utility Users Tax 2,176,400 2,519,725 360,478 2,382,909 94.57% 2,504,824 ‐4.87% Cannabis Tax 620,000 620,000 377,736 1,131,502 182.50% 15,586 7159.73%Tax Increment Pass‐thru Payment 577,200 717,000 ‐ 626,948 87.44% 682,748 ‐8.17% TAXES‐TOTAL 25,574,000 26,182,945 3,134,478 25,735,344 98.29% 25,895,160 ‐0.62%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
County WDA Shared Revenue 100,000 50,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 105,649 ‐100.00% Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 ‐ 73 0.24% 182,793 ‐99.96% Motor Vehicle In Lieu 31,100 31,100 ‐ 48,277 155.23% 40,258 19.92%Public Safety Augmentation Tax 205,690 200,950 44,299 200,773 99.91% 200,585 0.09% Planning Grants ‐ 150,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00%
Federal Grants ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 9,083 100.00%Other Grants 4,200 4,200 (916) 7,112 169.33% 5,362 32.64% INTERGOVERNMENTAL‐TOTAL 370,990 466,250 43,383 256,235 54.96% 543,730 ‐52.87%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES
Charges for Services 108,230 108,230 9,521 109,798 101.45% 149,954 ‐26.78% Information Technology Charges 36,490 36,490 3,041 36,490 100.00% 37,605 ‐2.97% CHARGES FOR SERVICES‐TOTAL 144,720 144,720 12,562 146,288 101.08% 187,559 ‐22.00%

FEES AND PERMITS
Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,150,000 1,150,000 196,139 1,311,853 114.07% 1,151,829 13.89% Building Permits and Fees 1,015,000 1,019,000 68,348 931,125 91.38% 1,259,029 ‐26.04% Planning Permits and Fees 70,150 72,650 8,305 106,719 146.89% 89,462 19.29% Engineering Permits and Fees 119,000 119,000 4,550 113,097 95.04% 135,368 ‐16.45% Developer Fees ‐ 386,650 (385,650) ‐ 0.00% 149,500 ‐100.00%Recycling Fees 87,700 109,840 ‐ 73,150 66.60% 61,928 18.12% June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2023/24

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1 of 11 ends

%
FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2023/24
Other Permits and Fees 276,025 386,025 113,204 470,138 121.79% 253,323 85.59% Community Services Fees 74,000 74,000 7,337 85,665 115.76% 73,490 16.57% FEES AND PERMITS ‐TOTAL 2,791,875 3,317,165 12,233 3,091,747 93.20% 3,173,929 ‐2.59%

FINES AND FORFEITURES
General Fines 6,700 6,710 478 2,738 40.80% 466 487.55%
Motor Vehicle Fines 85,000 87,745 22,382 64,201 73.17% 41,523 54.62% Parking Citations 270,000 300,000 66,537 327,756 109.25% 261,084 25.54% DMV Parking Collections 71,000 71,000 14,783 80,281 113.07% 73,946 8.57% Administrative Citation 10,000 10,000 2,880 13,929 139.29% 6,498 114.36% FINES AND FORFEITURES‐TOTAL 442,700 475,455 107,060 488,905 102.83% 383,517 27.48%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
Investment Earnings 190,000 650,000 446,894 1,320,813 203.20% 862,393 53.16%Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐ ‐ (108,910) 386,443 0.00% (317,220) ‐221.82% Loan Interest 9,000 9,000 368 7,814 86.82% ‐ 11,070 29.41% Rental Income 221,085 228,485 9,519 157,005 68.72% 164,938 ‐4.81% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY‐TOTAL 420,085 887,485 347,871 1,872,075 210.94% 721,181 159.58%

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
Miscellaneous Revenue 180,955 768,879 13,097 781,820 101.68% 86,678 801.98% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE‐TOTAL 180,955 768,879 13,097 781,820 101.68% 86,678 801.98%

TRANSFERS IN
From Gas Tax Fund 140,000 140,000 11,667 140,000 100.00% 95,000 47.37% From Protective Services Fund 382,000 386,000 (3,975) 386,000 100.00% 389,730 ‐0.96% From Supplemental Law Enforcement Grants Fund 160,000 160,000 13,333 160,000 100.00% 150,000 6.67% TRANSFERS IN‐TOTAL 682,000 686,000 21,025 686,000 100.00% 634,730 8.08% TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $ 30,607,325 $ 32,928,899 $ 3,691,709 $ 33,058,414 100.39% 31,626,484 $ 4.53% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 2 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund430100 Current Year‐Secured $ 1,096,100 $ 1,114,000 $ 8,750 $ 1,121,282 100.65% 1,116,680 $ 0.41% 430105 Current Year‐Unsecured 32,600 32,600 3,943 32,551 99.85% 31,470 3.44%430115 Property Tax‐Prior Year ‐ ‐ 498 498 0.00% 697 ‐28.55% 430115 Property Tax‐Supplemental 24,400 24,400 4,001 26,910 110.29% ‐ 46,181 41.73% 430120 Residual Redevelopment Property Tax 1,777,300 1,735,000 ‐ 1,904,348 109.76% 1,652,646 15.23% 430121 In‐Lieu Vehicle License Fee 5,511,700 5,694,750 8,711 5,703,462 100.15% 5,304,415 7.52%430135 Homeowners Tax Relief 4,800 4,800 665 4,435 92.40% ‐ 4,801 7.62% 430140 Property Transfer Tax 139,000 90,000 13,456 88,899 98.78% 112,865 ‐21.23% 430145 Property Tax‐Penalties/Int ‐ ‐ 14,686 17,531 0.00% 11,887 47.48% 430200 Sales And Use Tax 5,471,900 5,376,730 980,247 4,980,597 92.63% 5,321,610 ‐6.41% 430300 Transient Occupancy Tax 673,600 625,000 109,754 617,090 98.73% 671,096 ‐8.05% 430405 Franchise Tax/Cable TV 200,000 255,470 85,933 128,905 50.46% 227,368 ‐43.31% 430410 Franchise Tax/Electric 244,000 285,000 ‐ 275,397 96.63% 275,662 ‐0.10% 430415 Franchise Tax/Gas 75,000 98,000 ‐ 101,715 103.79% 96,193 5.74%430420 Franchise Tax/Refuse 550,000 615,000 103,510 672,994 109.43% 610,614 10.22% 430425 Franchise Tax/Water 88,000 88,000 ‐ 92,090 104.65% 86,619 6.32%430500 Business License Tax 158,000 158,000 7,971 172,969 109.47% 162,677 6.33%430600 Util User Tax/Electricity 1,218,400 1,407,000 150,115 1,341,745 95.36% 1,407,094 ‐4.64% 430605 Util User Tax/Telephone 196,300 228,725 37,354 210,703 92.12% 226,460 ‐6.96% 430610 Util User Tax/Gas 336,700 470,000 79,603 334,361 71.14% 458,179 ‐27.02%430615 Util User Tax/Water 425,000 414,000 93,406 496,100 119.83% 413,091 20.09% 430700 Cannabis Tax 620,000 620,000 377,736 1,131,502 182.50% 15,586 7159.73% 440100 AB 1389 Pass Through from RDA 577,200 717,000 ‐ 626,948 87.44% 682,748 ‐8.17% 101 General Fund 19,420,000 20,053,475 2,080,339 20,083,032 100.15% 18,936,639 6.05% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)430250 Transactions & Use Tax 6,154,000 6,129,470 1,054,139 5,652,312 92.22% 6,958,521 ‐18.77% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax) 6,154,000 6,129,470 1,054,139 5,652,312 92.22% 6,958,521 ‐18.77% TAXES ‐ TOTAL $ 25,574,000 $ 26,182,945 $ 3,134,478 $ 25,735,344 98.29% 25,895,160 $ ‐0.62% TAXES
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 3 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund432121 County WDA Shared Revenue $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.00% 105,649 $ 100.00% 432135 Mandated Cost Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 ‐ 73 0.24% 182,793 ‐99.96% 432150 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 31,100 31,100 ‐ 48,277 155.23% 40,258 19.92%432180 Public Safety Augmentation Tax 205,690 200,950 44,299 200,773 99.91% 200,585 0.09% 432245 Planning Grants ‐ 150,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 432256 Other Grants 4,200 4,200 (916) 7,112 169.33% 5,362 32.64% 432270 Federal Grants ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 9,083 100.00% INTERGOVERNMENTAL ‐ TOTAL $ 370,990 $ 466,250 $ 43,383 $ 256,235 54.96% 543,730 $ ‐52.87%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 4 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund433100 Charges For Services 108,230 $ $ 108,230 $ 9,521 $ 109,798 101.45% 149,954 $ ‐26.78% 433136 Information Technology Charges 36,490 36,490 3,041 36,490 100.00% 37,605 ‐2.97% CHARGES FOR SERVICES ‐ TOTAL $ 144,720 $ 144,720 $ 12,562 $ 146,288 101.08% 187,559 $ ‐22.00%

CHARGES FOR SERVICES
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 5 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund
431100 Building Plan Check Fees $ 135,000 $ 139,000 $ 7,264 $ 199,982 143.87% 159,236 $ 25.59%431105 Mechanical Permits 100,000 100,000 4,795 79,255 79.26% 282,548 ‐71.95% 431110 Building Permits 600,000 600,000 48,658 516,704 86.12% 509,077 1.50% 431115 Plumbing Permits 80,000 80,000 2,855 43,005 53.76% 103,405 ‐58.41% 431120 Electrical Permits 100,000 100,000 4,776 92,179 92.18% 204,763 ‐54.98% 431130 Engineering Plan Check Fees 35,000 35,000 ‐ 25,384 72.53% 25,345 0.15% 431135 Public Works Permits 84,000 84,000 4,550 87,713 104.42% 110,023 ‐20.28% 431140 S M I P ‐ Commercial Fees 400 400 ‐ 51 12.75% ‐ 91 43.96% 431145 S M I P‐Residential Permits 250 250 86 259 103.60% 73 254.79% 431146 SB 1473 Fee 2,500 2,500 148 1,467 58.68% ‐ 4,562 67.84% 431160 Solid Waste Impact Fees 1,150,000 1,150,000 196,139 1,311,853 114.07% 1,151,829 13.89% 431180 P/W Inspections 15,000 15,000 533 13,792 91.95% 22,444 ‐38.55% 431185 Parking Permits 45,000 45,000 1,200 49,465 109.92% 10,081 390.68% 431190 Towing Franchise Fee 25,000 25,000 180 9,090 36.36% 15,570 ‐41.62% 431192 Beautification/Enhancement Fee ‐ 50,000 (50,000) ‐ 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 431193 Neighborhood Preservation Fees ‐ 6,000 (6,000) ‐ 0.00% ‐ 19,500 100.00% 431194 Public Benefit Fee ‐ 330,650 (329,650) ‐ 0.00% 130,000 ‐100.00% 431195 Other Fees & Permits 15,000 60,000 6,856 71,648 119.41% 56,953 25.80% 431196 Forfeited Deposits ‐ 75,000 96,852 172,191 229.59% 198 86865.15%431201 Cannabis Business Renewal Permit Fee 10,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 433200 Conditional Use Permit 7,000 7,000 ‐ 7,455 106.50% ‐ 9,615 22.46%433205 Precise Plan Of Design 15,000 15,000 ‐ 6,140 40.93% 20,500 ‐70.05% 433220 Preliminary Plan Review 3,750 3,750 ‐ 5,625 150.00% 1,875 200.00% 433225 Environmental Services 4,400 4,400 ‐ 300 6.82% ‐ 900 66.67% 433227 Foreclosure Registration 10,000 10,000 ‐ 2,774 27.74% ‐ 7,712 64.03% 433230 Zoning Entitlements ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,595 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 433235 Land Divisions 2,500 2,500 ‐ 3,730 149.20% 3,070 21.50%433240 Special Event Permits 500 500 90 1,890 378.00% 1,890 0.00%

FEES AND PERMITS
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
FY 2023/24

ATTACHMENT A

Page 6 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund

FEES AND PERMITS
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
433245 Sign/Ban'R/Gar Sa/Temp Use Per 4,000 4,000 640 8,300 207.50% 5,535 49.95% 433250 Ministerial Services 12,000 12,000 1,460 16,785 139.88% 12,120 38.49%433260 Landscape Plan Check 1,500 1,500 325 1,950 130.00% 3,250 ‐40.00% 433270 General Plan Maint Surcharge 10,000 10,000 5,880 47,880 478.80% 24,885 92.41% 433285 Other Developmental Fees ‐ ‐ 2,500 2,185 87.40% ‐ 100.00% 433305 General Recreation Programs 52,000 52,000 3,232 55,867 107.44% 46,580 19.94% 433315 Sports Fields 22,000 22,000 4,105 29,798 135.45% 26,910 10.73% 437115 Recycling Fees 87,700 109,840 ‐ 73,150 66.60% 61,928 18.12% 430505 New/Moved Bus Lic Appl Rev 34,700 34,700 2,520 29,304 84.45% 33,350 ‐12.13% 430510 Business Tax Renewal Process 125,500 125,500 5,322 119,509 95.23% 106,766 11.94% 430515 SB 1186 2,175 2,175 (583) 1,472 67.68% 1,345 9.44% FEES AND PERMITS ‐ TOTAL $ 2,791,875 $ 3,317,165 $ 12,233 $ 3,091,747 93.20% 3,173,929 $ ‐2.59% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 7 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year101 General Fund434100 General Fines 6,700 $ $ 6,710 $ 478 $ 2,738 40.80% 466 $ 487.55% 434105 Motor Vehicle Fines 85,000 87,745 22,382 64,201 73.17% 41,523 54.62% 434110 Parking Citations 270,000 300,000 66,537 327,756 109.25% 261,084 25.54% 434115 DMV Parking Collections 71,000 71,000 14,783 80,281 113.07% 73,946 8.57% 434120 Administrative Citations 10,000 10,000 2,880 13,929 139.29% 6,498 114.36% FINES AND FORFEITURES ‐ TOTAL $ 442,700 $ 475,455 $ 107,060 $ 488,905 102.83% 383,517 $ 27.48%

FINES AND FORFEITURES
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

FY 2023/24

ATTACHMENT A

Page 8 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund435100 Interest Earned 190,000 $ $ 650,000 $ 446,894 $ 1,320,813 203.20% $ 862,393 53.16% 435110 Unrealized Gains (Losses) ‐ ‐ (108,910) 386,443 0.00% (317,220) 221.82% 435200 Loan Interest 9,000 9,000 368 7,814 86.82% 11,070 ‐29.41% 436100 Bus Shelter Site Rental ‐ ‐ 3,295 3,295 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 436115 Property Rental 7,200 14,600 1,234 14,602 100.01% 7,200 102.81% 436125 Indoor Facility Rental 164,000 164,000 3,745 91,548 55.82% 111,192 ‐17.67% 436127 Picnic Shelters 28,000 28,000 1,245 24,380 87.07% 24,243 0.57% 436135 Pac Bell Mobile Svcs‐Rent 21,885 21,885 ‐ 23,180 105.92% 22,303 3.93% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY ‐ TOTAL $ 420,085 $ 887,485 $ 347,871 $ 1,872,075 210.94% 721,181 $ 159.58%

USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

FY 2023/24

ATTACHMENT A

Page 9 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund437100 Sale Of Publications $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ 172 0.00% 83 $ ‐107.23%437105 Firework Services 475 475 473 473 99.58% 473 0.00%437110 Candidate Statements ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 1,508 100.00% 437125 Donations ‐ 35,750 ‐ 35,759 100.03% 3,500 921.69% 437130 Insurance Reimbursement ‐ 6,141 406 7,563 123.16% ‐ 100.00% 437135 Expense Reimbursement 15,000 34,560 9,880 57,864 167.43% 41,232 40.34% 437137 Loan Repayment from Landscape Maintenance District 135,480 661,953 ‐ 661,953 100.00% ‐ 100.00% 437195 Other Revenue 30,000 30,000 2,338 18,036 60.12% 39,882 ‐54.78% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE ‐ TOTAL $ 180,955 $ 768,879 $ 13,097 $ 781,820 101.68% 86,678 $ 801.98%

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

FY 2023/24

ATTACHMENT A

Page 10 of 11 ends

FY 2023/24 FY 2023/24 Activity % Change
Adopted Amended During Year To Date Percent of FY 2022/23 From Acct. No. Description Budget Budget June Actual * Budget Actual* Prior Year 101 General Fund439211 Transfer From Gas Tax Fund $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 11,667 $ 140,000 100.00% 95,000 $ 47.37% 439223 Transfer From Protective Services Fund 382,000 386,000 (3,975) 386,000 100.00% 389,730 ‐0.96% 439242 Transfer From Supp Law Enf Grant 160,000 160,000 13,333 160,000 100.00% 150,000 6.67% TRANSFERS IN ‐ TOTAL $ 682,000 $ 686,000 $ 21,025 $ 686,000 100.00% 634,730 $ 8.08%

TRANSFERS IN
June 2024 General Fund Revenues (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT A

Page 11 of 11 ends

Division
No. Description
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
1100 City Council $ 129,105 $ 144,645 $ 12,019 $ 121,920 84.29% 122,988 $ ‐0.87%1200 City Attorney 300,000 630,000 165,707 573,546 91.04% 563,415 1.80% 1300 City Manager 588,165 623,160 89,689 561,957 90.18% 478,143 17.53% 1400 City Clerk 206,565 218,770 34,409 223,276 102.06% 245,488 ‐9.05% 1410 Personnel/Risk Management 280,410 296,085 33,531 265,134 89.55% 231,783 14.39% 1510 Information Technology 1,039,515 863,659 75,892 733,619 84.94% 634,197 15.68% Administration 2,543,760 2,776,319 411,247 2,479,452 89.31% 2,276,014 8.94% 1500 Finance 1,080,775 1,093,880 117,690 969,033 88.59% 904,091 7.18% 1600 Non‐Dept (excludes Transfers) 390,000 395,000 85,313 315,613 79.90% 360,954 12.56% Finance 1,470,775 1,488,880 203,003 1,284,646 86.28% 1,265,045 1.55% 1520 Emergency Preparedness 5,000 5,000 21 2,932 58.64% 4,175 29.77% 2100 Law Enforcement 14,655,075 13,777,981 1,013,838 13,588,021 98.62% 6,430,654 111.30% 2200 Fire Protection 5,549,765 5,551,815 1,373,776 5,542,861 99.84% 5,308,200 4.42% 2230 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 300 2,383 95.32% ‐ 2,238 6.48% 2300 Homeless Prevention 422,385 406,785 23,313 207,357 50.97% 56,470 267.20% 2400 Animal Control Services 211,015 211,015 ‐ 211,012 100.00% 200,964 5.00% 2500 Public Safety‐Other 213,125 224,905 23,762 226,978 100.92% 140,056 62.06% 4300 Parking Control 258,050 276,605 32,993 261,325 94.48% 229,236 14.00% 6200 Code Enforcement 622,955 636,050 80,291 625,187 98.29% 615,509 1.57% Public Safety 21,939,870 21,092,656 2,548,294 20,668,056 97.99% 12,987,502 59.14% 3000 Public Works Administration 607,060 615,025 83,410 618,897 100.63% 579,178 6.86% 3100 Engineering 491,025 487,025 55,914 364,984 74.94% 308,918 18.15% 3200 Public Facilities 649,865 669,695 95,710 641,559 95.80% 784,254 ‐18.19% 3300 Crossing Guard 46,000 46,000 10,023 53,059 115.35% 49,215 7.81% 3400 Parks Maintenance 503,140 513,851 105,570 513,723 99.98% 375,077 36.96% 3500 Street Maintenance 477,045 493,599 55,382 383,285 77.65% 403,256 ‐4.95% 3600 Storm Drains 170,800 204,365 18,939 182,302 89.20% 170,690 6.80% 6300 Graffiti Abatement 129,800 128,600 8,852 81,291 63.21% 85,639 ‐5.08% Public Works 3,074,735 3,158,160 433,800 2,839,100 89.90% 2,756,227 3.01% City of Stanton
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
% Change
from Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1 of 29 ends

Division
No. Description
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
Percent of
Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
City of Stanton
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
% Change
from Prior
Year
4000 Community Development Administration 389,890 393,075 54,491 326,106 82.96% 256,648 27.06% 4100 Planning 515,740 684,470 42,448 356,514 52.09% 297,746 19.74% 4200 Building Regulation 602,190 601,290 86,048 411,839 68.49% 296,249 39.02% 4400 Economic Development 12,500 12,500 1,674 7,846 62.77% 2,852 175.11% Community Development 1,520,320 1,691,335 184,661 1,102,305 65.17% 853,495 29.15% 5000 Public Information Office 116,640 196,840 5,021 159,716 81.14% 133,414 19.71% 5100 Community Services Administration 660,400 683,923 101,493 670,874 98.09% 613,306 9.39% 5200 Community Center Operations 134,605 302,525 25,402 156,444 51.71% 119,704 30.69% 5300 Park Operations 360,365 362,175 45,159 347,380 95.91% 269,414 28.94% 5400 Senior Citizen Programs 77,535 56,940 8,245 56,569 99.35% 82,140 ‐31.13% 5500 Recreation Programs 105,230 109,827 13,293 108,790 99.06% 75,370 44.34% Community Services 1,454,775 1,712,230 198,613 1,499,773 87.59% 1,293,348 15.96% Transfer To Public Benefit Fee Fund ‐ 1,507,796 1,507,796 1,507,796 100.00% ‐ 100.00% Transfer To Beautification Fee Fund ‐ 190,000 190,000 190,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% Transfer To Neighborhood Preservation Fee ‐ 108,000 108,000 108,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% Transfer to FACT Grant 46,865 75,020 32,189 54,106 72.12% 55,429 ‐2.39% Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 9,420 1,420 ‐ 69 4.86% ‐ 6,769 98.98% Transfer to SCP Maintenance 64,775 64,775 5,398 64,775 100.00% 56,412 14.82% Transfer to Capital Projects Fund 660,000 1,484,916 197,217 425,297 28.64% 51,466 726.36% Transfers to Other Funds 781,060 3,431,927 2,040,600 2,350,043 68.48% 170,076 1281.76% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 32,785,295 $ 35,351,507 $ 6,020,218 $ 32,223,375 91.15% $ 21,601,707 49.17% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 2 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
101 General Fund1100 City Council
501105 Salaries‐Elected $ 52,200 $ 52,200 $ 6,035 $ 52,199 100.00% $ 54,764 ‐4.68% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,120 1,120 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00%502120 Medicare/Fica 755 755 87 757 100.26% 791 ‐4.30% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 750 750 5 47 6.27% 644 ‐92.70% 602100 Special Dept Expense 10,100 10,100 1,170 10,239 101.38% 7,980 28.31% 602110 Office Expense 2,000 2,000 ‐ 803 40.15% 1,903 ‐57.80% 602115 Postage ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 43,950 43,950 ‐ 39,724 90.38% 33,992 16.86% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 15,000 15,000 4,722 14,598 97.32% 12,167 19.98% 608105 Professional Services ‐ 15,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 3,230 3,770 ‐ 3,549 94.14% 2,389 48.56% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 8,358 ‐100.00% 1100 City Council Total 129,105 144,645 12,019 121,920 84.29% 122,988 ‐0.87% 1200 City Attorney
608105 Professional Services 300,000 630,000 165,707 573,546 91.04% 563,415 1.80% 1200 City Attorney Total 300,000 630,000 165,707 573,546 91.04% 563,415 1.80% 1300 City Manager
501110 Salaries‐Regular 353,525 358,525 56,511 340,606 95.00% 285,069 19.48% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 500 ‐ 500 ‐ 0.00% 57 ‐100.00%501120 Salaries‐Part‐Time ‐ ‐ 2,061 4,779 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 66,695 66,695 9,826 70,654 105.94% 73,179 ‐3.45% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,275 5,275 978 5,737 108.76% 5,245 9.38% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 26,625 26,625 3,556 27,593 103.64% 24,726 11.60% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,200 4,200 44 3,228 76.86% 705 357.87%502115 Unemployment Insurance 505 ‐ 505 283 56.04% 331 14.50% Administration ‐ Shin‐Heydorn
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 3 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Administration ‐ Shin‐Heydorn
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
% Change
From Prior
Year
1300 City Manager, Continued
502120 Medicare/Fica 4,775 4,875 832 4,964 101.83% 4,026 23.30% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 1,467 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 35 35 53 309 882.86% 2,509 ‐87.68% 602100 Special Dept Expense ‐ 25,000 6,870 6,870 27.48% ‐ 0.00% 602110 Office Expense 10,600 10,600 1,576 8,615 81.27% 8,903 ‐3.23% 602115 Postage 200 200 ‐ 903 451.50% 118 665.25% 602120 Books/Periodicals 100 100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,000 1,000 ‐ 495 49.50% 467 6.00% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 4,800 4,800 650 1,064 22.17% 1,723 38.25% 608105 Professional Services 78,000 78,000 6,560 51,633 66.20% 48,000 ‐7.57% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 2,065 2,065 172 2,065 100.00% 2,060 0.24% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 29,265 34,160 ‐ 32,159 94.14% 19,558 64.43% 1300 City Manager Total 588,165 623,160 89,689 561,957 90.18% 478,143 17.53% 1400 City Clerk
501110 Salaries‐Regular 124,505 124,505 14,276 128,100 102.89% 118,540 8.06% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 500 500 84 971 194.20% 188 416.49% 502100 Retirement 35,275 35,275 4,387 38,443 108.98% 41,150 ‐6.58% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,965 1,965 238 2,139 108.85% 2,181 ‐1.93% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 20,535 20,535 2,887 22,027 107.27% 19,607 12.34% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 67 358 0.00% 40 795.00%
502115 Unemployment Insurance 245 245 ‐ 139 56.73% 161 ‐13.66% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,790 1,790 203 1,823 101.84% 1,664 9.56% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 2,637 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 15 15 13 115 766.67% 1,043 ‐88.97% 602110 Office Expense 2,250 2,250 290 1,114 49.51% 2,305 ‐51.67% 602115 Postage 500 500 51 869 173.80% 584 48.80%
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 4 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Administration ‐ Shin‐Heydorn
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
% Change
From Prior
Year
1400 City Clerk, Continued
602120 Books/Periodicals 100 100 ‐             76 76.00% 72 5.56% 607100 Membership/Dues 415 415 ‐             250 60.24% 415 ‐39.76% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,200 1,200 ‐             ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 608105 Professional Services 6,000 6,000 335 4,755 79.25% 4,658 ‐2.08% 608135 Microfilming ‐ 11,000 11,000 11,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 120 1,705 68.20% 1,421 19.99% 608140 Elections 1,000 1,000 410 909 90.90% 42,864 97.88% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 575 575 48 575 100.00% 530 8.49% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 7,195 8,400 ‐             7,908 94.14% 5,428 45.69% 1400 City Clerk Total 206,565 218,770 34,409 223,276 102.06% 245,488 ‐9.05% 1410 Personnel/Risk Management
501110 Salaries‐Regular 123,500 123,500 13,946 114,810 92.96% 132,128 ‐13.11% 501120 Salaries‐Part‐Time 47,795 60,595 4,538 47,348 78.14% ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 29,720 31,165 2,990 27,201 87.28% 32,383 ‐16.00% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,575 2,575 309 2,708 105.17% 2,431 11.39% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 17,845 17,845 3,056 23,062 129.24% 17,749 29.93% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 69 208 0.00% ‐ 100.00%
502115 Unemployment Insurance 450 450 ‐ 252 56.00% 272 ‐7.35% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,400 2,610 259 2,276 87.20% 1,857 22.56% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐             ‐ 0.00% 2,192 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 30 30 17 146 486.67% 1,163 ‐87.45% 602110 Office Expense 1,400 2,220 1,267 2,605 117.34% 1,647 58.17% 602115 Postage 200 200 8 266 133.00% 144 84.72%
607100 Membership/Dues 725 775 ‐                775 100.00% 400 93.75%607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 2,000 150 ‐ 144 96.00% 402 ‐64.18% 607115 Training 6,000 5,180 93 5,082 98.11% (198) ‐2666.67% 607120 Education Reimbursement Program 10,000 10,000 1,250 3,697 36.97% 3,305 11.86% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 5 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Administration ‐ Shin‐Heydorn
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
% Change
From Prior
Year
1410 Personnel/Risk Management, Continued
608105 Professional Services 13,750 13,750 3,779 11,595 84.33% 14,040 ‐17.41% 608125 Advertising/ Business Dev't 2,200 ‐ 2,200 775 35.23% 1,374 43.60% 609125 Employee/Volunteer Recognition 12,000 13,800 1,905 13,642 98.86% 11,905 14.59% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 535 535 45 535 100.00% 495 8.08% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 7,285 8,505 ‐ 8,007 94.14% 5,070 57.93% 701105 Equipment‐General ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 2,338 ‐100.00% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 686 ‐100.00%
1410 Personnel/Risk Management 280,410 296,085 33,531 265,134 89.55% 231,783 14.39% 1510 Information Technology501110 Salaries‐Regular 101,935 101,935 11,326 101,930 100.00% 88,349 15.37% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 6,000 6,000 ‐ 3,162 52.70% 16,602 ‐80.95% 502100 Retirement Charges 28,070 28,070 3,481 30,590 108.98% 30,730 ‐0.46% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,560 1,560 189 1,702 109.10% 1,650 3.15% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 17,335 17,335 2,504 18,930 109.20% 16,593 14.08% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 225 225 ‐ 126 56.00% 150 ‐16.00% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,425 1,425 147 1,387 97.33% 1,400 ‐0.93% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 1,940 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 15 15 10 92 613.33% 789 ‐88.34%602140 Materials & Supplies 15,000 5,000 132 2,611 52.22% 7,846 66.72% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 50,000 60,000 2,871 72,498 120.83% 90,261 19.68% 604100 Communications 112,500 127,500 15,446 97,527 76.49% 110,040 ‐11.37%607100 Membership/Dues 35,410 59,410 11,740 54,226 91.27% 8 677725.00% 608100 Contractual Services 358,575 442,809 27,544 336,835 76.07% 239,754 40.49% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 6,020 6,020 502 6,020 100.00% 5,555 8.37% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 5,445 6,355 ‐ 5,983 94.15% 3,976 50.48% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 6 of 29 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 7 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
101 General Fund1500 Finance501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 616,015 $ 562,875 $ 72,402 $ 491,638 87.34% 484,725 $ 1.43% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 1,000 1,000 17 896 89.60% 385 132.73% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 64,810 84,810 6,101 72,942 86.01% 55,775 30.78% 502100 Retirement 117,395 114,555 14,315 108,325 94.56% 127,465 ‐15.02% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 10,255 10,255 1,311 9,428 91.94% ‐ 9,946 5.21% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 78,245 81,550 10,520 80,646 98.89% 52,045 54.95%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 5,285 2,400 289 2,245 93.54% ‐ 3,530 36.40% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,895 1,895 ‐ 1,316 69.45% 1,291 1.94% 502120 Medicare/FICA 9,520 8,740 975 6,878 78.70% 6,665 3.20%502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% (7,147) ‐100.00%502130 Other Benefit Charges 520 1,000 71 682 68.20% 4,294 ‐84.12% 602102 Legal Notices ‐ ‐ 1,861 1,861 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense 6,000 4,890 686 3,360 68.71% ‐ 7,096 52.65% 602115 Postage 3,500 3,500 118 2,651 75.74% 2,769 ‐4.26% 602120 Books/Periodicals 100 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 194 ‐100.00%607100 Membership/Dues 1,100 1,100 ‐ 830 75.45% 1,095 ‐24.20% 607105 Mileage Reimbursement 100 100 ‐ 27 27.00% ‐ 100.00% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 5,845 5,095 608 4,471 87.75% ‐ 5,449 17.95% 607115 Training 1,400 3,835 549 3,479 90.72% ‐ 3,818 8.88%608105 Professional Services 86,180 120,445 4,337 100,594 83.52% 68,291 47.30% 608107 Financial Services 20,600 27,000 2,808 25,342 93.86% 26,142 ‐3.06%608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 11,242 ‐100.00% 611116 Payment to Other Agencies 1,000 1,000 130 1,012 101.20% 928 9.05% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 3,345 3,345 279 3,345 100.00% 3,105 7.73% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 40,165 46,880 ‐ 44,134 94.14% 29,482 49.70% Finance‐Bannigan
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 8 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Finance‐Bannigan
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
1500 Finance, Continued701100 Equipment‐Office ‐ 1,110 ‐ 1,110 100.00% 636 74.53% 702100 Furniture‐Office ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 359 ‐100.00% 1500 Finance Total 1,074,275 1,087,380 117,377 967,212 88.95% 899,580 7.52% 1600 Non‐Departmental610235 Economic Development Loan Repayment 350,000 350,000 85,313 266,308 76.09% 319,048 ‐16.53% 611105 Revenue Sharing‐City of Anaheim 40,000 45,000 ‐ 49,305 109.57% 41,906 17.66% 1600 Non‐Departmental Total 390,000 395,000 85,313 315,613 79.90% 360,954 ‐12.56% 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 1,464,275 $ 1,482,380 $ 202,690 $ 1,282,825 86.54% 1,260,534 $ 1.77% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)
1500 Finance608105 Professional Services 6,500 6,500 313.000 1,821 28.02% 4,511 ‐59.63% 102 TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TOTAL $ 6,500 $ 6,500 $ 313.000 $ 1,821 28.02% $ ‐ 4,511 59.63% TOTAL FINANCE $ 1,470,775 $ 1,488,880 $ 203,003 $ 1,284,646 86.28% 1,265,045 $ 1.55% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 9 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund
1520 Emergency Services602140 Materials & Supplies $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 21 $ 2,932 58.64% $ ‐ 100.00% 608105 Professional Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 4,175 ‐100.00%1520 Emergency Services 5,000 5,000 21 2,932 58.64% ‐ 4,175 29.77% 2100 Law Enforcement602100 Special Dept Expense 1,500 3,000 370 3,542 118.07% 4,959 ‐28.57% 602110 Office Expense 4,000 2,500 ‐ 1,538 61.52% 3,481 ‐55.82% 602145 Gas/Oil/Lube 3,000 3,000 468 2,540 84.67% 1,843 37.82%604100 Communications 44,000 59,000 259 42,833 72.60% 41,515 3.17% 608100 Contractual Services 18,700 18,700 2,850 17,100 91.44% 18,156 ‐5.82% 608160 O.C.S.D. Contract 10,130,355 8,394,535 323,739 8,223,222 97.96% 2,127,845 286.46% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 6,020 6,020 502 6,020 100.00% 5,555 8.37% 2100 Law Enforcement Total 10,207,575 8,486,755 328,188 8,296,795 97.76% 2,203,354 276.55% 2200 Fire Protection602100 Special Department Expense 45,950 48,000 ‐ 47,756 99.49% 45,046 6.02% 608185 O.C.F.A. Contract 4,003,815 4,003,815 995,558 3,982,232 99.46% 3,163,154 25.89% 2200 Fire Protection Total 4,049,765 4,051,815 995,558 4,029,988 99.46% 3,208,200 25.62% 2230 Ambulance Services608190 Contractual Ambulance Svcs 2,500 2,500 300 2,383 95.32% 2,238 6.48% 2230 Ambulance Services Total 2,500 2,500 300 2,383 95.32% 2,238 6.48%2300 Homeless Prevention501110 Salaries‐Regular 307,350 280,195 17,180 154,750 55.23% 18,105 754.74% 502100 Retirement 55,635 55,635 3,254 29,014 52.15% 4,489 546.34% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,665 4,245 287 2,584 60.87% 333 675.98% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 45,215 44,815 1,797 14,029 31.30% 2,812 398.90% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,200 4,200 525 4,200 100.00% 525 700.00% % Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Public Safety‐Wren
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 10 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Public Safety‐Wren
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
2300 Homeless Prevention, Continued502115 Unemployment Insurance 895 670 ‐ 337 50.30% 38 786.84% 502120 Medicare/Fica 4,365 3,965 255 2,304 58.11% 268 759.70% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 1,403 ‐100.00%502130 Other Benefits 60 60 15 139 231.67% 159 ‐12.58% 610230 North SPA Navig Ctr Cost Share ‐ 13,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 27,878 ‐100.00% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 460 ‐100.00%
2300 Homeless Prevention Total 422,385 406,785 23,313 207,357 50.97% 56,470 267.20% 2400 Animal Control Services608170 Animal Control Services 211,015 211,015 ‐ 211,012 100.00% 200,964 5.00% 2400 Animal Control Services Total 211,015 211,015 ‐ 211,012 100.00% 200,964 5.00% 2500 Public Safety‐Other501110 Salaries‐Regular 106,670 106,670 17,050 106,673 100.00% 77,452 37.73% 502100 Retirement Charges 22,200 22,200 3,437 25,161 113.34% 20,552 22.43% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,550 1,550 285 1,781 114.90% 1,425 24.98% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 5,840 5,840 699 5,542 94.90% 2,114 162.16% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 2,100 2,100 374 2,696 128.38% 2,136 26.22% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 190 190 ‐ 107 56.32% 56 91.07%502120 Medicare/FICA 1,445 1,445 250 1,582 109.48% 1,154 37.09% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 739 ‐100.00%502130 Other Benefit Charges 15 15 15 96 640.00% 682 ‐85.92% 602100 Special Department Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 1,510 ‐100.00% 602110 Office Expense 1,200 845 172 1,050 124.26% 2,064 ‐49.13%602115 Postage 250 100 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 602130 Clothing 4,500 4,500 81 2,821 62.69% 6,559 ‐56.99% 602140 Materials and Supplies ‐ 1,800 599 1,654 91.89% ‐ 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues ‐ ‐ ‐ 490 0.00% ‐ 100.00%607115 Training 700 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 50 ‐100.00% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 11 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Public Safety‐Wren
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
2500 Public Safety‐Other, Continued608100 Contractual Services 4,680 ‐ 4,680 4,678 99.96% 4,678 0.00% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 61,785 72,115 ‐ 67,890 94.14% 18,885 259.49% 701105 Equipment‐General ‐ ‐ 800 4,401 0.00% ‐ 100.00%702100 Office Furniture ‐ 355 ‐ 356 100.28% ‐ 100.00%2500 Public Safety‐Other Total 213,125 224,905 23,762 226,978 100.92% 140,056 62.06% 4300 Parking Control501110 Salaries‐Regular 141,145 141,145 17,747 135,641 96.10% 126,515 7.21% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime 100 100 ‐ 80 80.00% 50 ‐60.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 15,715 29,295 3,102 22,947 78.33% 14,367 59.72% 502100 Retirement 30,545 30,545 4,025 32,835 107.50% 38,759 ‐15.28% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,340 2,550 348 2,648 103.84% 2,616 1.22% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 16,605 16,730 2,348 17,782 106.29% 10,821 64.33% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 1,200 1,200 113 969 80.75% 2,792 ‐65.29% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 415 530 17 359 67.74% 260 38.08% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,175 2,375 299 2,289 96.38% 2,062 11.01% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% (4,504) ‐100.00%502130 Other Benefit Charges 95 170 19 143 84.12% 1,122 ‐87.25%602110 Office Expense 3,500 3,500 ‐ 3,960 113.14% 4,080 ‐2.94%602115 Postage 500 250 15 188 75.20% 162 16.05% 604100 Communications 680 680 ‐ 362 53.24% 368 ‐1.63%608105 Professional Services 31,000 35,500 3,957 29,087 81.94% 23,101 25.91% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 12,035 12,035 1,003 12,035 100.00% 6,665 80.57% 4300 Parking Control Total 258,050 276,605 32,993 261,325 94.48% 229,236 14.00% 6200 Code Enforcement501110 Salaries‐Regular 422,690 422,690 54,551 415,193 98.23% 391,370 6.09% 502115 Salaries‐Overtime 100 100 ‐ 1,569 1569.00% 478 228.24% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 15,715 29,290 3,102 22,947 78.34% 14,367 59.72% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 12 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Public Safety‐Wren
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
6200 Code Enforcement, Continued502100 Retirement 88,765 88,765 11,902 96,432 108.64% 110,874 ‐13.03% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 6,540 6,750 963 7,317 108.40% 7,466 ‐2.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 45,470 45,595 6,292 47,887 105.03% 42,404 12.93% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 3,300 3,300 494 3,677 111.42% 4,005 ‐8.19% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,075 1,185 17 731 61.69% 679 7.66% 502120 Medicare/FICA 6,125 6,325 834 6,390 101.03% 5,896 8.38% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% (4,094) ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 140 215 52 394 183.26% 3,451 ‐88.58% 602110 Office Expense 2,000 1,354 150 503 37.15% 2,726 ‐81.55% 602115 Postage 500 1,500 128 1,414 94.27% 880 60.68%
602120 Books/Periodicals ‐ ‐ ‐ 61 0.00% ‐ 100.00%
602160 Code Enforcement Equipment 6,000 4,200 46 632 15.05% 6,205 ‐89.81% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 1,000 1,000 ‐ 450 45.00% ‐ 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 600 600 ‐ 500 83.33% 600 16.67%
607115 Training 900 1,100 ‐ 994 90.36% 637 ‐56.04%
608100 Contractual Services 4,000 3,400 ‐ 1,575 46.32% 3,465 ‐54.55% 608105 Professional Services 6,000 6,000 757 3,840 64.00% 2,851 34.69% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 12,035 12,035 1,003 12,035 100.00% 21,110 ‐42.99% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ 646 ‐ 646 100.00% 139 364.75%6200 Code Enforcement Total 622,955 636,050 80,291 625,187 98.29% 615,509 1.57% 101 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 15,992,370 $ 14,301,430 $ 1,484,426 $ 13,863,957 96.94% $ 6,660,202 108.16% 102 General Fund (Transactions & Use Tax)2100 Law Enforcement608160 O.C.S.D. Contract 4,447,500 5,291,226 685,650 5,291,226 100.00% 4,227,300 25.17% 2100 Law Enforcement Total 4,447,500 5,291,226 685,650 5,291,226 100.00% 4,227,300 25.17% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 13 of 29 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 14 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
101 General Fund3000 Public Works Administration
501110 Salaries‐Regular 391,825 $ $ 391,825 $ 58,848 $ 389,670 99.45% $ 364,074 7.03% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 18,615 18,615 2,733 16,920 90.89% 16,334 3.59% 502100 Retirement Charges 68,640 68,640 10,729 79,068 115.19% 90,101 ‐12.25% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,920 5,920 1,028 6,790 114.70% 6,945 ‐2.23% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 54,220 54,220 7,617 57,516 106.08% 48,003 19.82% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 600 600 ‐ 162 27.00% 875 ‐81.49% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 895 895 ‐ 531 59.33% 892 ‐40.47%502120 Medicare/FICA 5,540 5,540 867 5,752 103.83% 5,408 6.36% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 3,351 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 195 195 55 366 187.69% 3,211 ‐88.60% 602110 Office Expense 2,000 2,000 972 1,816 90.80% 983 84.74% 602115 Postage 200 200 ‐ 34 17.00% 148 ‐77.03%602120 Books/Periodicals 200 200 ‐ 110 55.00% ‐ 100.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,750 1,750 ‐ 50 2.86% 1,183 ‐95.77%607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,800 1,800 59 618 34.33% 1,297 ‐52.35%607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ 1,127 112.70% ‐ 100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 6,020 6,020 502 6,020 100.00% 5,555 8.37% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 47,640 55,605 ‐ 52,347 94.14% 30,818 69.86% 3000 Public Works Administration Total 607,060 615,025 83,410 618,897 100.63% 579,178 6.86% 3100 Engineering501110 Salaries‐Regular 80,040 80,040 10,560 95,061 118.77% 64,372 47.67% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 1,500 500 ‐ 892 178.40% 10,832 ‐91.77% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time ‐ 98,630 10,304 91,859 93.13% ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 14,515 31,590 2,896 25,922 82.06% 16,273 59.29%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,240 2,810 348 3,122 111.10% 1,201 159.95% % Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 15 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
3100 Engineering, Continued502110 Health/Life Insurance 8,855 9,775 1,273 10,504 107.46% 7,867 33.52% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ ‐ 132 764 0.00% 176 334.09% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 180 405 ‐ 383 94.57% 120 219.17% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,145 2,575 304 2,732 106.10% 1,090 150.64% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 962 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 10 160 19 168 105.00% 574 ‐70.73% 602120 Books/Periodicals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 159 ‐100.00% 602130 Clothing ‐ 915 ‐ 655 71.58% 54 1112.96%
602140 Materials & Supplies 2,000 1,085 ‐ 54 4.98% 165 ‐67.27% 607100 Membership/Dues ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 350 ‐100.00% 608105 Professional Services 120,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 608110 Engineering Services 206,320 206,320 28,643 109,889 53.26% 176,652 ‐37.79% 608115 Inspection Services 15,000 15,000 515 6,160 41.07% 4,200 46.67%608120 Plan Checking Services 30,000 30,000 318 9,599 32.00% 17,206 ‐44.21% 608135 Microfilming 3,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 7,220 7,220 602 7,220 100.00% 6,665 8.33% 3100 Engineering Total 491,025 487,025 55,914 364,984 74.94% 308,918 18.15% 3200 Public Facilities501110 Salaries‐Regular 61,760 56,192 9,633 75,533 134.42% 62,262 21.31% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 2,000 5,000 288 4,894 97.88% 2,592 88.81% 502100 Retirement 10,665 10,317 1,816 14,250 138.12% 15,390 ‐7.41% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 925 925 161 1,261 136.32% 1,149 9.75% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 10,235 9,261 1,466 10,270 110.90% 8,425 21.90% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 420 420 295 2,262 538.57% 140 1515.71% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 235 235 ‐ 219 93.19% 114 92.11% 502120 Medicare/FICA 860 790 147 1,193 151.01% 942 26.65% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 16 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
3200 Public Facilities, Continued502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 392 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 15 15 9 68 453.33% 549 ‐87.61%602100 Special Dept Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ 75 0.00% 2,348 ‐96.81% 602110 Office Expense 9,000 9,000 441 4,586 50.96% 211 2073.46% 602125 Small Tools ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 781 ‐100.00% 602130 Clothing 7,100 7,100 ‐ 4,894 68.93% 3,904 25.36% 602135 Safety Equipment 500 500 ‐ 264 52.80% 339 ‐22.12%602140 Materials & Supplies 10,500 10,500 1,023 6,174 58.80% 5,709 8.15% 603105 Equipment Maintenance ‐ 25,000 2,178 17,713 70.85% 18,868 6.12% 603110 Building Maintenance 127,240 127,240 8,985 96,989 76.23% 108,795 ‐10.85%604100 Communications 9,000 9,000 80 3,504 38.93% 5,954 ‐41.15%604105 Utilities 175,000 175,000 51,148 195,485 111.71% 179,877 8.68%607115 Training ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 91 ‐100.00% 608100 Contractual Services 170,820 169,610 14,799 159,129 93.82% 151,913 4.75% 611110 O.C. Sanitation District User Fee 14,700 14,700 ‐ 3,906 26.57% 13,801 ‐71.70% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 38,890 38,890 3,241 38,890 100.00% 36,105 7.71% 701105 Equipment‐General ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 119,057 ‐100.00% 704100 Facility Improvements ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 44,546 ‐100.00% 3200 Public Facilities Total 649,865 669,695 95,710 641,559 95.80% 784,254 ‐18.19% 3300 Crossing Guard608175 Crossing Guard Services 46,000 46,000 10,023 53,059 115.35% 49,215 7.81% 3300 Crossing Guard Total 46,000 46,000 10,023 53,059 115.35% 49,215 7.81% 3400 Parks Maintenance501110 Salaries‐Regular 72,420 69,330 8,720 84,073 121.26% 71,886 16.95% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 3,000 2,000 364 1,825 91.25% 1,541 18.43% 502100 Retirement 12,655 12,460 1,641 15,855 127.25% 17,618 ‐10.01% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 17 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
3400 Parks Maintenance, Continued
502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,100 1,100 146 1,404 127.64% 1,328 5.72% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 12,975 12,435 1,499 11,957 96.16% 11,399 4.90% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 210 210 161 1,231 586.19% 630 95.40%502115 Unemployment Insurance 280 ‐ 280 241 86.07% 185 30.27% 502120 Medicare/Fica 1,020 980 133 1,258 128.37% 1,074 17.13%502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 666 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 20 20 8 76 380.00% 635 ‐88.03%602100 Special Dept Expense 13,000 13,000 4,215 11,447 88.05% 3,806 200.76% 603105 Equipment Maintenance 17,000 17,000 1,429 5,741 33.77% 9,751 ‐41.12%604105 Utilities 185,000 185,000 42,284 202,489 109.45% 171,771 17.88% 605100 Land Lease 7,000 7,000 ‐ 4,026 57.51% 2,661 51.30% 608100 Contractual Services 167,830 183,406 44,167 162,470 88.58% 71,236 128.07% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 9,630 9,630 803 9,630 100.00% 8,890 8.32%3400 Parks Maintenance Total 503,140 513,851 105,570 513,723 99.98% 375,077 36.96% 3500 Street Maintenance501110 Salaries‐Regular 94,260 90,975 9,553 75,876 83.40% 67,358 12.65% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 5,000 4,000 299 3,869 96.73% 3,738 3.50% 502100 Retirement 16,400 16,195 1,799 14,278 88.16% 16,599 ‐13.98% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,420 1,420 160 1,267 89.23% 1,247 1.60% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 13,515 12,940 1,315 9,903 76.53% 9,886 0.17% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 1,260 1,260 307 2,357 187.06% 1,961 20.19% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 350 350 ‐ 212 60.57% 197 7.61% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,330 1,290 146 1,185 91.86% 1,059 11.90% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 839 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 25 25 9 68 272.00% 597 ‐88.61% 602100 Special Dept Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 2,288 ‐100.00% 602125 Small Tools 6,000 6,000 640 640 10.67% 582 ‐9.97% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 18 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
% Change
From Prior
Year
Public Works‐Rangel
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
3500 Street Maintenance, Continued
602140 Materials & Supplies 65,000 65,000 8,224 48,437 74.52% 47,783 1.37% 603105 Equipment Maintenance ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐                  0.00% 1,242 ‐100.00% 608100 Contractual Services 210,750 232,409 31,952 200,696 86.35% 177,050 13.36% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 11,735 11,735 978 11,735 100.00% 10,830 8.36% 710190 Pavement Maintenance 50,000 50,000 ‐                 12,762 25.52% 60,000 ‐78.73% 3500 Street Maintenance Total 477,045 493,599 55,382 383,285 77.65% 403,256 ‐4.95% 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance
501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐                  0.00% 179 ‐100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐                  0.00% 3 ‐100.00% 602140 Materials & Supplies ‐ ‐ 384 384 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 603100 Emergency Maintenance Services 10,000 10,000 2,018 2,018 20.18% 23,698 91.48% 608100 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐                  0.00% 500 ‐100.00% 608155 Storm Water Monitor Program 160,800 194,365 16,537 179,900 92.56% 146,310 22.96% 3600 Storm Drain Maintenance Total 170,800 204,365 18,939 182,302 89.20% 170,690 6.80% 6300 Graffiti Abatement
501110 Salaries‐Regular 61,650 60,690 3,810 31,089 51.23% 30,376 2.35% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 6,000 6,000 1,048 8,115 135.25% 8,243 ‐1.55% 502100 Retirement Charges 10,640 10,580 716 5,837 55.17% 7,588 ‐23.08%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 915 915 64 519 56.72% 571 ‐9.11% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 6,450 6,282 275 2,230 35.50% 4,452 ‐49.91%502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 1,890 1,890 263 2,027 107.25% 422 380.33% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 235 235 ‐ 98 41.70% 111 ‐11.71% 502120 Medicare/FICA 870 858 74 597 69.58% 566 5.48%
502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐                  0.00% 619 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 15 15 3 28 186.67% 273 ‐89.74% 602140 Materials & Supplies 25,000 25,000 1,339 18,588 74.35% 19,092 ‐2.64% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 19 of 29 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 20 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
101 General Fund
4000 Community Development Administration
501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 242,125 $ 236,115 $ 41,752 $ 189,409 80.22% 152,145 $ 24.49% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ 200 ‐ 149 74.50% 12 1141.67% 502100 Retirement Charges 42,145 41,685 7,541 38,701 92.84% 37,804 2.37% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 3,460 3,460 697 3,163 91.42% 2,799 13.00% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 20,225 19,820 1,491 10,598 53.47% 8,608 23.12% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,200 2,315 611 1,555 67.17% 82 1796.34% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 425 425 8 239 56.24% 148 61.49% 502120 Medicare/FICA 3,290 3,225 605 2,758 85.52% 2,180 26.51%502130 Other Benefit Charges 30 155 38 170 109.68% ‐ 1,339 87.30% 602110 Office Expense 2,500 3,850 1,336 4,434 115.17% 814 ‐444.72% 602120 Books/Periodicals 1,200 425 ‐ 423 99.53% 557 24.06%607100 Membership/Dues 1,600 1,600 150 275 17.19% ‐ 610 54.92%607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings ‐ ‐ 175 175 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 607115 Training 1,200 1,200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 10 ‐100.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 1,045 1,045 87 1,045 100.00% 965 8.29% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 66,445 77,555 ‐ 73,012 94.14% 48,358 50.98% 702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 217 ‐100.00%4000 Community Development Administration Total 389,890 393,075 54,491 326,106 82.96% 256,648 27.06% 4100 Planning501110 Salaries‐Regular 358,595 330,230 21,414 208,098 63.02% 184,764 12.63% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime 1,200 2,400 1,056 2,571 107.13% 759 238.74%501125 Salaries‐Appointed 9,000 9,000 1,038 9,000 100.00% 8,792 2.37%502100 Retirement 65,970 57,370 4,056 38,741 67.53% 45,320 ‐14.52% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,635 5,635 358 3,475 61.67% 3,401 2.18% Community Development‐Landavazo
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From
Prior Year
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 21 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Community Development‐Landavazo
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From
Prior Year
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
4100 Planning, Continued
502110 Health/Life Insurance 51,160 43,360 4,080 28,435 65.58% 25,035 13.58%502115 Unemployment Insurance 1,120 1,120 118 545 48.66% 644 15.37% 502120 Medicare/FICA 5,280 3,680 343 3,194 86.79% 2,807 13.79% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay ‐ 2,000 267 1,116 55.80% 477 133.96% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 805 305 19 187 61.31% 1,627             ‐88.51% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐                 ‐                ‐                  0.00% (2,904)            ‐100.00% 602102 Legal Notices ‐ ‐                 1,157 1,157 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐                 ‐                ‐                  0.00% 424                 ‐100.00% 602115 Postage 500 500 74 720 144.00% 31 100.00%
602120 Books/Periodicals ‐ 425 ‐                ‐                  0.00% ‐ 0.00%602140 Materials & Supplies ‐ ‐                 ‐                ‐                  0.00% 809                 ‐100.00%607100 Membership/Dues 1,200 1,200 150 270 22.50% 632                 ‐57.28% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 8,200 8,200 ‐                300 3.66% 870 65.52% 607115 Training 1,050 1,050 ‐                495 47.14% ‐ 100.00% 608105 Professional Services ‐ 215,970 8,149 56,185 26.02% 22,388           ‐150.96% 608135 Microfilming 4,000 ‐                 ‐                ‐                  0.00% ‐ 0.00% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 2,025 2,025 169 2,025 100.00% 1,870 8.29% 4100 Planning Total 515,740 684,470 42,448 356,514 52.09% 297,746 19.74% 4200 Building Regulation
501110 Salaries‐Regular 138,300 54,520 6,433 55,450 101.71% 32,412 71.08% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ 100 ‐                42 42.00% ‐ 100.00% 502100 Retirement 25,975 18,825 1,219 10,503 55.79% 7,821 34.29%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 2,160 2,160 107 926 42.87% 596 55.37% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 22,625 1,255 157 1,256 100.08% 2,364             ‐46.87% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 22 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description
% of
Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual*
Community Development‐Landavazo
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From
Prior Year
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
4200 Building Regulation, Continued
502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,200 4,200 525 4,200 100.00% 1,641 155.94% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 450 ‐ 450 126 28.00% ‐ 100.00% 502120 Medicare/FICA 2,030 835 101 865 103.59% 494 75.10% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% (1,101) ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 30 50 6 50 100.00% ‐ 285 82.46% 602110 Office Expense ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 144 ‐100.00%602115 Postage 200 200 ‐ 176 88.00% 166 6.02% 602120 Books/Periodicals 1,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 607100 Membership/Dues 1,200 1,200 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 500 500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 607115 Training 1,000 1,000 ‐ 35 3.50% ‐ 100.00%608115 Inspection Services 280,250 353,725 50,886 211,232 59.72% 68,581 208.00% 608120 Plan Checking Services 110,000 154,000 26,112 119,585 77.65% 60,481 97.72% 608130 Temporary Help ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 110,528 ‐100.00%608135 Microfilming 4,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 611116 Payment to Other Agencies 2,250 2,250 ‐ 1,373 61.02% 727 88.86% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 6,020 6,020 502 6,020 100.00% 11,110 ‐45.81% 4200 Building Regulation Total 602,190 601,290 86,048 411,839 68.49% 296,249 39.02% 4400 Economic Development
607100 Membership/Dues 2,000 1,865 ‐ 319 17.10% ‐ 2,029 84.28% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings ‐ 2,635 1,674 4,510 171.16% 137 ‐3191.97%607115 Training 2,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 80 100.00% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 23 of 29 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 24 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
101 General Fund5000 Public Information Office
501110 Salaries‐Regular $ 87,480 $ 87,480 $ 3,452 $ 76,009 86.89% $ 79,161 ‐3.98% 502100 Retirement Charges 15,800 15,800 654 14,307 90.55% 19,497 ‐26.62%502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,340 1,340 58 1,269 94.70% 1,457 ‐12.90% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 3,455 3,455 393 3,446 99.74% 3,251 6.00% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 4,200 4,200 ‐                3,325 79.17% 4,200 ‐20.83% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 280 280 ‐                157 56.07% 289 ‐45.67% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,315 1,315 50 1,150 87.45% 1,209 ‐4.88% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐                 ‐                ‐                  0.00% 665 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 20 20 3 (105) ‐525.00% 697 ‐115.06% 602113 Social Media 2,500 2,500 332 2,354 94.16% 3,188 ‐26.16% 607100 Membership/Dues 250 250 79 354 141.60% ‐ 100.00% 608105 Professional Services ‐ 80,200 ‐                57,450 71.63% 19,800 190.15% 5000 Public Information Office 116,640 196,840 5,021 159,716 81.14% 133,414 19.71% 5100 Community Services Administration
501110 Salaries‐Regular 352,685 352,685 51,160 342,581 97.14% 313,561 9.25% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐                 ‐                803 0.00% ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 23,185 23,185 38 17,384 74.98% 2,478 601.53%502100 Retirement 68,035 68,035 10,121 75,778 111.38% 84,295 ‐10.10% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 5,405 5,405 855 6,011 111.21% 5,847 2.80% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 31,020 31,020 4,391 33,398 107.67% 28,588 16.83% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 6,600 6,600 750 6,415 97.20% 5,813 10.36% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 840 840 ‐                471 56.07% 414 13.77% 502120 Medicare/FICA 5,135 5,135 730 5,187 101.01% 4,502 15.22% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐                 ‐                ‐                  0.00% 3,411 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 190 325 46 324 99.69% 2,761 ‐88.27%602100 Special Dept Expense 15,600 19,145 2,026 14,789 77.25% 15,972 ‐7.41% 602110 Office Expense 3,185 3,775 261 3,769 99.84% 2,925 28.85% 602115 Postage 600 260 3 260 100.00% 489 ‐46.83%
607100 Membership/Dues 550 870 ‐                870 100.00% 605 43.80% Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Actual*
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
% Change
From Prior
Year
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 25 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Actual*
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
% Change
From Prior
Year
5100 Community Services Administration, Continued
607115 Training 6,135 3,388 297 3,330 98.29% 6,925 51.91% 603110 Building Maintenance 11,450 9,675 3,150 9,675 100.00% 11,000 ‐12.05% 609100 Special Events 71,600 88,010 26,496 87,279 99.17% 43,343 101.37% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 14,025 14,025 1,169 14,025 100.00% 12,945 8.34% 612115 Liability Insurance Charge 44,160 51,545 ‐ 48,525 94.14% 67,432 ‐28.04% 5100 Community Services Administration Total 660,400 683,923 101,493 670,874 98.09% 613,306 9.39% 5200 Community Center Operations
501110 Salaries‐Regular 39,300 69,610 9,312 55,834 80.21% 30,220 84.76% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ 150 78 330 220.00% ‐ 100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 61,140 37,350 2,285 20,663 55.32% 41,876 ‐50.66% 502100 Retirement 15,240 14,960 1,922 12,007 80.26% 10,400 15.45% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 1,555 1,725 194 1,277 74.03% 1,327 ‐3.77% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 6,010 11,225 2,919 12,409 110.55% 4,626 168.24% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 930 1,155 156 1,172 101.47% 2,448 ‐52.12% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 460 450 ‐ 311 69.11% 268 16.04% 502120 Medicare/FICA 1,430 1,580 168 1,114 70.51% 1,080 3.15% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 1,969 ‐100.00%502130 Other Benefit Charges 140 90 10 69 76.67% 287 ‐75.96% 602100 Special Dept Expense 4,000 5,000 1,616 4,518 90.36% 10,965 ‐58.80% 602110 Office Expense 1,000 1,000 268 1,007 100.70% 1,135 ‐11.28% 603110 Building Maintenance 3,400 2,400 300 1,861 77.54% 2,254 ‐17.44% 608105 Professional Services ‐ 155,830 6,174 43,872 28.15% 10,454 319.67% 612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 395 ‐100.00% 5200 Community Center Operations 134,605 302,525 25,402 156,444 51.71% 119,704 30.69% 5300 Park Operations501110 Salaries‐Regular 81,625 81,625 7,244 83,345 102.11% 77,599 7.40%501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ 2,500 ‐ 2,135 85.40% 1,871 14.11% 501120 Salaries‐Part Time 225,650 225,650 31,469 214,324 94.98% 137,945 55.37% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 26 of 29 ends

Acct. No. Description % of Budget
Community Service ‐ Bobadilla
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
FY 2022/23
Actual*
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
% Change
From Prior
Year
5300 Park Operations , Continued
502100 Retirement 14,300 14,300 1,372 14,665 102.55% 18,982 ‐22.74% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 4,685 4,685 647 4,971 106.10% 3,966 25.34% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 13,010 13,010 1,522 10,467 80.45% 10,296 1.66% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 5,300 5,300 439 4,851 91.53% 3,055 58.79% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 2,685 2,685 171 1,584 58.99% 1,196 32.44% 502120 Medicare/FICA 4,445 4,445 568 4,417 99.37% 3,196 38.20% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 2,548 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 1,665 975 35 268 27.49% 752 ‐64.36% 602100 Special Dept Expense 4,000 4,000 89 3,632 90.80% 6,941 ‐47.67% 602110 Office Expense 3,000 3,000 1,603 2,721 90.70% 851 219.74%702100 Office Furniture ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 216 ‐100.00% 5300 Park Operations 360,365 362,175 45,159 347,380 95.91% 269,414 28.94%5400 Senior Citizens Programs 501110 Salaries‐Regular 19,650 ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 18,606 ‐100.00%501120 Salaries‐Part Time 46,455 46,455 6,946 52,360 112.71% 48,488 7.99% 502100 Retirement 3,575 2,130 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 4,541 ‐100.00% 502105 Workers Comp Insurance 985 985 116 874 88.73% 1,235 ‐29.23% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 3,130 3,130 ‐ ‐ 0.00% 2,783 ‐100.00% 502111 Medical In‐Lieu Pay 960 960 138 1,200 125.00% 1,449 ‐17.18% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 415 415 ‐ 243 58.55% 412 ‐41.02% 502120 Medicare/FICA 920 920 103 777 84.46% 994 ‐21.83% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 2,136 ‐100.00% 502130 Other Benefit Charges 245 245 6 47 19.18% 188 ‐75.00% 609200 Senior Citizen Program 1,200 1,700 936 1,068 62.82% 1,308 ‐18.35% 5400 Senior Citizens Programs 77,535 56,940 8,245 56,569 99.35% 82,140 ‐31.13% * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 27 of 29 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 28 of 29 ends

Acct. No.

Description
% of Budget
101 General Fund1600 Non‐Departmental800104 Transfer To Public Benefit Fee Fund $ ‐ $ 1,507,796 $ 1,507,796 $ 1,507,796 100.00% $ ‐ 100.00% 800105 Transfer To Beautification Fee Fund ‐ 190,000 190,000 190,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% 800106 Transfer To Neighborhood Preservation Fee Fund ‐ 108,000 108,000 108,000 100.00% ‐ 100.00% 800250 Transfer to FACT Grant 46,865 75,020 32,189 54,106 72.12% 55,429 ‐2.39% 800251 Transfer to Senior Transportation Fund 9,420 ‐ 1,420 69 4.86% 6,769 ‐98.98% 800280 Transfer to SCP Maintenance Fund 64,775 64,775 5,398 64,775 100.00% 56,412 14.82% 800305 Transfer to Capital Projects Fund 660,000 1,484,916 197,217 425,297 28.64% 51,466 726.36% TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT $ 781,060 $ 3,431,927 $ 2,040,600 $ 2,350,043 68.48% $ 170,076 1281.76% Transfers to Other Funds‐Bannigan
June 2024 General Fund Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
FY 2022/23
Actual*
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
* = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

ATTACHMENT B

Page 29 of 29 ends

Fiscal Year Projected
2023/24 Ending
Balance Increase Balance
7/1/2023 (A) (Decrease) Adjustments 6/30/2024

GENERAL FUNDS
General Fund (#101)
Unassigned $  12,890,227 $     ‐ 3,557,932 $ $      16,448,159 Reserve ‐ Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers)       1,328,850      (1,328,850) ‐ ‐ Reserve ‐ Prepaid Items          150,708         (150,708) ‐ ‐ Reserve ‐ Economic Uncertainty (1)        ‐                 6,100,000 ‐           6,100,000 Reserve ‐ Emergency Disaster Continuity (1)        ‐                 3,000,000 ‐           3,000,000 Reserve ‐ Capital Improvement (1)        ‐                 5,000,000 ‐           5,000,000 Reserve ‐Equipment and Maintenance (1)           ‐                 150,000 ‐               150,000 Reserve ‐Technology Equipment (1)           ‐                 150,000 ‐               150,000 Committed by Developer Agreements for Public Benefit/Public Facilities (2) 1,507,796          330,650              ‐ (1,838,446)
Committed by Developer Agreements for Beautification Projects (2)          190,000             50,000                 ‐ (240,000) Committed by Developer Agreements for Neighborhood Preservation (2)          108,000               6,000                 ‐ (114,000) Assigned for Special Projects (3)       4,975,672       ‐ (2,213,580)           2,762,092 Total General Fund     35,551,253          251,444             (2,192,446)         33,610,251 Transaction & Use Tax Fund (#102)
Unassigned          868,256          ‐ (868,256) ‐
Total Transaction & Use Tax Fund          868,256         (868,256) ‐ ‐ TOTAL $ 36,419,509 $      (616,812) $         (2,192,446) $      33,610,251 Notes:
(A) ‐ Per City's audited financial statements as of June 30, 2023. (1) ‐ Per City Council Reserve Policy adopted annually. (3) ‐ Assigned by City Council on June 13, 2023.
(2) ‐ Pursuant to approved developer agreements, this amount represents public benefit fees the City received that should be used for the following projects relating to: public facilities, neighborhood preservation, and city beautification/enhancement. The City Council authorized the transfer of these funds to 3 new separate funds on June 11, 2024.

City of Stanton

DISCRETIONARY FUND BALANCE

GENERAL FUND
ATTACHMENT: C
Click here to return to the agenda.

Account
No. Description
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year

REVENUES
435100 Interest 25,000 $ $ 275,000 $ 106,766 $ 398,969 145.08% 252,442 $ 58.04% 435110 Unrealized Gains/Losses ‐ ‐ (35,246) 112,502 0.00% 12,835 776.53% 436140 Tina Way/Pacific Ave. Property Rent 620,000 650,000 48,853 623,076 95.86% 671,330 ‐7.19% 437195 Other Revenue ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 213 ‐100.00% TOTAL REVENUES $ 645,000 $ 925,000 $ 120,373 $ 1,134,547 122.65% 936,820 $ 21.11%

EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES
Salaries and Benefits
501110 Salaries‐Regular 142,795 143,680 22,098 135,849 94.55% 133,101 2.06% 501115 Salaries‐Overtime ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% 40 ‐100.00% 501120 Salaries‐Part‐Time 2,435 2,435 127 2,115 86.86% ‐ 2,253 6.13% 502100 Retirement 25,990 25,990 3,895 27,809 107.00% 34,798 ‐20.08% 502105 Workers' Compensation 2,160 2,160 371 2,304 106.67% ‐ 2,491 7.51% 502110 Health/Life Insurance 14,425 14,210 1,826 15,375 108.20% 13,200 16.48% 502111 Medical in Lieu 470 645 50 319 49.46% 355 ‐10.14% 502115 Unemployment Insurance 250 250 ‐ 151 60.40% 248 ‐39.11%502120 Medicare/FICA 1,965 1,980 301 1,844 93.13% 1,807 2.05% 502125 Leave Disbursals ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.00% (1,593) 0.00% 502130 Other Benefits 30 70 20 124 177.14% ‐ 1,172 89.42% Total‐Salaries and Benefits 190,520 191,420 28,688 185,890 97.11% 187,872 ‐1.05% Maintenance and Operations
602100 Special Dept Expense 500 500 100 531 106.20% 283 87.63% 602115 Postage 500 100 ‐ 28 28.00% 51 ‐45.10%602130 Clothing 2,500 2,500 206 1,455 58.20% ‐ 2,937 50.46% 602140 Materials and Supplies 2,500 2,500 525 2,358 94.32% 2,020 16.73% 604105 Utilities 60,000 60,000 8,451 55,776 92.96% 51,049 9.26%607100 Membership Dues 4,800 4,800 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 607110 Travel/Conference/Meetings 1,000 1,000 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 607115 Training 2,500 2,500 ‐ ‐ 0.00% ‐ 0.00% 608100 Contractual Services 23,000 16,260 1,043 17,303 106.41% 19,177 ‐9.77% HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
June 2024 Revenues and Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Attachment: D
Click here to return to the agenda.

Account
No. Description
FY 2023/24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2023/24
Amended
Budget
Activity
During June
Year to Date
Actual *% of Budget
FY 2022/23
Actual *
% Change
From Prior
Year
HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND (#285)
June 2024 Revenues and Expenditures (100% of year)
FY 2023/24
Maintenance and Operations , Continued
608105 Professional Services 328,875 477,565 92,221 417,634 87.45% 228,540 82.74% 610130 Tina Pacific Operating Expense (QMG) 243,825 206,475 12,190 161,771 78.35% 232,627              ‐30.46% 610131 Bad Debt Expense (QMG) 40,000 75,505 8,170 80,565 106.70% 41,923 92.17% 610135 Relocation Assistance 40,000 4,283,000 144,736 498,768 11.65% 27,385 1721.32% 610230 Navigation Center (North SPA) 95,000                  ‐ 95,000 56,338 59.30% 50,000 12.68% 611110 O.C. Sanitation User Fee 24,000                  ‐ 24,295 24,292 99.99% 19,484 24.68% Total‐Maintenance and Operations 869,000 5,252,000 267,642 1,316,819 25.07% 675,476 94.95% Allocated Charges
612105 Vehicle Replacement Charge 12,305 12,305 1,025 12,305 100.00% 5,805 111.97%612115 Liability Insurance Charge 8,690                  ‐ 10,145 9,551 94.14% 6,540 46.04% 612140 Information Technology Charge 19,215 19,215 1,601 19,215 100.00% 18,215 5.49% 614205 Admin Overhead 20,980 20,980 3,692 24,453 116.55% 24,633                ‐0.73% Total‐Allocated Charges 61,190 62,645 6,318 65,524 104.60% 55,193 18.72% Capital Outlay
702100 Office Furniture                  ‐ ‐                      ‐                   ‐ 0.00% 218                     ‐100.00%760100 Demolition/Condemnation 100,000            ‐                      ‐                   ‐ 0.00% 93,800                ‐100.00% 790100 Land Acquisition                  ‐ ‐                      ‐                   ‐ 0.00% 2,500,000          ‐100.00% Total‐Capital Outlay 100,000           ‐                      ‐                   ‐ 0.00% 2,594,018          ‐100.00%TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,220,710 $ 5,506,065 $ 302,648 $ 1,568,233 28.48% 3,512,559 $      ‐55.35% REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (575,710) $ $ (4,581,065) $ (182,275) $ (433,686) $ (2,575,739) * = Actual data is reported through June. Fiscal Year 2023/24 actual data is subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end close.

Housing Authority Fund (Fund 285) - Fund Balance Status Available Fund Balance as of June 30, 2023 $ 9,838,500
Estimated increase (decrease) of fund balance
during Fiscal Year 2023-24 (4,541,065)
Projected Available Fund Balance as of June 30, 2024 $ 5,297,435

ATTACHMENT E
Click here to return to the agenda.

Task Code Description
Adopted
Budget
2023/24
FY 2022/23
Budget
Carryover
Other Budget
Adjustments
Amended
Budget 2023/24
YTD
Actual
2023/24* Encumbrances
% Spent
(Includes
Encumbrances)
Remaining
Budget
Street Projects
2022‐102 Citywide Street Sign Replacement ‐ $ $ ‐ 149,490 $ $ ‐ 149,490 $ $ 39,840 26.7% 109,650 $ 2023‐101 Citywide Street Rehabilitation (FY 2022/23) ‐ 2,013,050 ‐ 2,013,050 1,128,901 32,154 57.7% 851,9952023‐103 Catch Basin Connector Pipe Screen
Installations (FY 2022/23) ‐ 69,935 7,000 76,935 43,915 ‐ 57.1% 33,020 2024‐101 Citywide Street Rehabilitation (FY 2023/24) 1,690,000 ‐ ‐ 1,690,000 150,410 ‐ 8.9% 1,539,590 2024‐102 Cerritos Avenue Resurfacing 930,000 ‐ 30,000 960,000 864,892 ‐ 90.1% 95,108 Total Street Projects $ 2,620,000 $ 2,232,475 $ 37,000 $ 4,889,475 $ 2,188,118 $ 71,994 46.2% 2,629,363 $ Parks Projects
2021‐201 Park Master Plan $ ‐ $ 8,306 $ ‐ $ 8,306 $ (1,954) $ ‐ 0.0% $ 10,260 2022‐201 Family Resource Center Improvements (Phase 1) ‐ 196,639 (30,825) 165,814 ‐ 127,362 76.8% 38,452 2022‐204 Norm Ross Sports Park 2,000,000 7,566,660 ‐ 9,566,660 211,640 375,200 6.1% 8,979,820 2022‐205 Replace Shade Structure at Stanton Central Park ‐ ‐ 58,360 58,360 44,138 ‐ 75.6% 14,222 2022‐206 Premier Park Renovation 840,000 764,875 ‐ 1,604,875 495,972 27,363 32.6% 1,081,540 2022‐820 Stanton Park Adult Fitness Equipment 90,000 84,090 ‐ 174,090 80,404 ‐ 46.2% 93,686 2022‐833 Stanton Park Refresh ‐ 410,000 ‐ 410,000 ‐ 290,840 70.9% 119,160 2023‐201 Family Resource Center Improvements (Phase 2) 150,000 203,055 43,834 396,889 113,376 267,802 96.0% 15,711 2024‐601 Stanton Central Park Lighting Project ‐ 76,000 ‐ 76,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 76,000 Total Parks Projects $ 3,156,000 $ 9,291,985 $ 13,009 $ 12,460,994 $ 1,070,938 $ 961,205 16.3% 10,428,851 $ Sewer
2022‐301 Sewer Master Plan Update $ ‐ $ 488,200 $ ‐ $ 488,200 $ 271,458 $ 213,267 99.3% $ 3,475 2024‐301 Annual Sewer Rehabilitation (FY 2023/24) 550,000 ‐ ‐ 550,000 ‐ ‐ 0.0% 550,000 Total Sewer $ 550,000 $ 488,200 $ ‐ $ 1,038,200 $ 271,458 $ 213,267 46.7% $ 553,475 Facilities
2022‐834 City Fire Alarm Upgrade Project $ ‐ $ 173,015 $ ‐ $ 173,015 $ 145,395 $ 27,494 99.9% $ 126 2022‐839 ADA Transition Plan ‐ 33,595 ‐ 33,595 21,930 10,965 97.9% 700 2023‐603 Stanton Community Center Improvements ‐ 500,000 ‐ 500,000 149,676 132,288 56.4% 218,036 Total Facilities $ ‐ $ 706,610 $ ‐ $ 706,610 $ 317,001 $ 170,747 69.0% $ 218,862 Storm Drain
2024‐801 Storm Drain Master Plan $ 600,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 600,000 $ 211,698 $ 382,159 99.0% $ 6,143 2024‐802 Stanford Avenue Storm Drain Repair 60,000 ‐ ‐ 60,000 48,229 ‐ 0.0% 11,771 Total Storm Drain $ 660,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 660,000 $ 259,927 $ 382,159 97.3% $ 17,914 GRAND TOTAL $ 6,986,000 $ 12,719,270 $ 50,009 $ 19,755,279 $ 4,107,442 $ 1,799,372 29.9% 13,848,465 $

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2023/24

STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024
* - Actual expenditures through June 30, 2024, are subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end closing process.

ATTACHMENT F

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF STANTON
FY 2023/24

STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP)
JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024
Funding Source
101 General Fund Assigned Fund Balance $ 660,000 $ ‐ 824,916 $ $ 1,484,916 $ 425,298 $ 711,458 76.6% 348,160 $ 211 Gas Tax Fund 638,710 286,240 207,000 1,131,950 87,018 71,994 14.0% 972,938 215 RMRA Fund 956,695 983,465 15,000 1,955,160 ‐ 998,465 51.1% 956,695 220 Measure M Turnback Fund 824,595 906,770 15,000 1,746,365 ‐ 1,068,362 61.2% 678,003 221 CDBG‐CV Grant Fund ‐ ‐ 500,000 500,000 149,676 132,288 56.4% 218,036 227 Other Grants Fund 276,000 8,027,691 (189,996) 8,113,695 560,588 475,560 12.8% 7,077,547 305 Capital Projects Fund (Reserves) ‐ 89,360 3,005 92,365 78,143 ‐ 84.6% 14,222 310 Park In‐Lieu Fund 3,080,000 612,628 ‐ 3,692,628 468,434 194,805 18.0% 3,029,389501 Sewer Maintenance Fund 440,155 488,200 109,845 1,038,200 271,458 213,267 46.7% 553,475 502 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund 109,845 ‐ (109,845) ‐ ‐ ‐ 0.0% ‐ GRAND TOTAL $ 6,986,000 $ 12,719,270 $ 50,009 $ 19,755,279 $ 4,107,442 $ 1,799,372 29.9% 13,848,465 $ * - Actual expenditures through June 30, 2024, are subject to change pending the completion of the City's fiscal year end closing process.

ATTACHMENT F

Page 2 ends

2 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27,2024
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS

FOR THE STANTON FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER UNDER THE

COUNTY OF ORANGE FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES TOGETHER
(FaCT) PROGRAM
REPORT IN BRIEF:

Resolution No. 2024-30 will authorize the City to submit an application for grant funds for the Stanton Family Resource Center under the County of Orange Families and Communities Together (FaCT) Program to provide human and social services from the County of Orange Social Services Agency.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

2. Approve Resolution No. 2024-30, authorizing the application for FaCT grant funding, entitled:
“A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT

FUNDS FOR FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER UNDER THE COUNTY OF
ORANGE FAMILIES AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER (FaCT)
PROGRAM”; and

3. Authorize the Community Services Director to sign the Families and Community Together (FaCT) Program Grant Application.

Item: 9G
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 BACKGROUND:

The County of Orange Social Services Agency (SSA) is currently requesting proposals from public, private non-profit organizations, and community collaboratives to provide Families and Communities Together (FaCT) Family Resource Center (FRC) Services.

The purpose of this program is to strengthen prevention and intervention services designed to reduce the risk of child abuse and neglect. FaCT is a public-private partnership of the County of Orange SSA. The partnership is a network of FRCs located throughout Orange County’s highest-risk communities providing essential family support services, education, and resources.

FaCT’s mission is to identify and promote promising and best practices, train, fund, and advocate for FRCs to be Orange County’s community-based platform for prevention activities and family support services. SSA is currently requesting proposals to provide services for the following four (4) Service Components:
• Family Resource Center (FRC) Services
• Family Stabilization (FS) Services
• Elder Adult Support (EAS) Services
• Differential Response - Path One (DR – Path One) Services The County intends to award a minimum of two (2) FRCs per required FRC Service Region. The City of Stanton resides in service region #4 along with Brea, Buena Park, Fullerton, La Habra, Placentia, and portions of Anaheim.

Proponents must propose for all FaCT services components: FRC Services, FS Services, EAS Services, and DR-Path One Services. The following services are to be provided by FaCT FRCs:
• Case Management Team
• Counseling
• Differential Response – Path Two
• Emergency Response
• Family Support Services
• Information and Referral Services
• Parenting Education and Supports
• Personal Empowerment Program
• Childcare Services
• FS Services – Four (4) FRCs
• EAS Services – Five (5) FRCs
• DR – Path One Services – Five (5) FRCs
The City currently acts as the lead fiscal agent with sub-contractors/collaborative members assisting with the provision of services, receiving this grant award for the past three funding cycles, which initiated the programs at the Stanton Family Resource Center. 3 ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

The Stanton Family Resource Center has been partially funded by the FaCT grant for the past 25 years, with the current agreement and funding set to expire on June 30, 2025. If awarded this cycle, the term of the resulting contract will begin on July 1, 2025, and terminate on June 30, 2028.

The estimated amounts available for each year of the three-year contract are listed in the table below:

Type of Service Estimated Amount
Per Fiscal Year
Number Of Contracts
To Be Awarded
Family Resource Center (FRC) $380,000 Sixteen (16)
Family Stabilization (FS) $175,000 Four (4)
Elder Adult Support Services (EAS) $140,000 Five (5)
Differential Response – Path One
Services
$150,000 Five (5)
TOTAL $845,000
The County intends to conduct oral interviews with the highest-ranked proposer(s) to confirm and clarify aspects of the proposal in October 2024 and final award announcements in the spring of 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

If awarded, the total amount of the grant is potentially $845,000 each year, for three (3) years. The City as lead fiscal agent has supported the FaCT grant during the current agreement with $50,300 each year, off-setting costs associated with the delivery of social and human service programs at the Stanton Family Resource Center.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Through the normal agenda process.
4 STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES ADDRESSED:

Obj. No. 4: Ensure fiscal stability and efficiency in governance.

Obj. No. 5: Provide a high quality of life.

Prepared by: Zenia Bobadilla, Community Services Director Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachment:

A. Resolution No. 2024-30
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-30

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-30

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR FAMILY

RESOURCE CENTER UNDER THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FAMILIES AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER (FaCT) PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the County of Orange, California is soliciting proposals for grants for the project shown above; and
WHEREAS, the City of Stanton Community Services Department desires to act as the lead agency (Proponent) and submit a grant proposal for human and social services for the City of Stanton; and
WHEREAS, the County of Orange Social Services Agency has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, including establishing necessary procedures; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the County of Orange Social Services Agency require the Proponent to certify, by resolution, the approval of applications before submission of said applications to the County of Orange Social Services Agency.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Approves the filing of an application for local assistance for the Stanton Family Resource Center.

SECTION 2: Certifies that Proponent understands the assurances and certification in the application form.

SECTION 3: Certifies that Proponent has reviewed and understands the General Provisions contained in the Model Contract shown in the Request for Proposal.

SECTION 4: Appoints the City Manager and/or the Community Services Director as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 27
th day of August, 2024.

DAVID J. SHAWVER, MAYOR
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-30

Page 2 of 2 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

HONG DAO NGUYEN, CITY ATTORNEY
ATTEST:

I, Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-30 has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the Stanton City Council, held on August 27, 2024, and that the same was adopted, signed and approved by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

PATRICIA A. VAZQUEZ, CITY CLERK

CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO THE 2023-2024 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT DATED JUNE 11, 2024, ENTITLED, “TALKING TRASH:

RECYCABLES AND ORGANIC WASTE”
REPORT IN BRIEF:

On June 11, 2024, the Orange County Grand Jury released a report entitled “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste” (Attachment A). The purpose of the report was to review the challenges of complying with the requirements and goals of State of California Senate Bill 1383 which requires jurisdictions responsible for waste collection to coordinate with their residents to divert organic waste from landfill waste disposal streams. California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 require any public agency that the Grand Jury reviews respond to the findings and recommendations of the Grand Jury Report. The City’s proposed response letter responds to each of the applicable findings and recommendations (Attachment B).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities or governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

BACKGROUND:

In 2016, the State of California enacted Senate Bill (SB) 1383, requiring jurisdictions responsible for waste collection to coordinate with their residents to divert organic waste, including food scraps, from landfill waste disposal streams. SB 1383 set goals to reduce organic waste sent to landfills below the 2014 baseline by 50% no later than January 1, 2020 and 75% by January 1, 2025. This diversion goal is meant to move the State towards the desired “circular economy” where organic waste is collected, converted into new materials or products, and reused for other purposes. However, a Item: 9H
Click here to return to the agenda.
2023 Little Hoover Commission report states that despite the law’s requirements, the amount of organic waste sent to landfills statewide has increased 23% above the 2014 baseline.

As specified by SB1383, each jurisdictions’ responsibilities relating to residential units include:
• Providing organics collection services to all residents. • Conducting education and outreach to the community.
• Procuring recyclable and recovered organic products.
• Securing access to recycling capacity.
• Monitoring compliance and conducting enforcement.

The Orange County Grand Jury released the “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste” report on June 11, 2024. The purpose of the report was to examine how the Orange County jurisdictions are responding to the single-family residential unit organics diversion mandate under SB 1383, successes and challenges, and the impact of this requirement. The report focuses on the specific requirements associated with SB 1383, local actions taken so far to meet those requirements, success of those actions and how they are measured, local agency outreach and education efforts, and the challenges that remain for the County of Orange and the County’s 34 cities.

The report identifies the following as key challenges in implementing SB1383:
• Container Standardization
• Funding and Enforcement
• Education and Outreach
• Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products
ANALYSIS AND JUSTIFICATION:

California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 require any public agency that the Grand Jury reviews respond to the findings and recommendations of the Grand Jury report. The City is required to respond because it is reviewed in the report along with the other 33 Orange County cities and the County of Orange. The proposed response letter responds to each of the applicable findings and recommendations listed on pages 18-21 of the report.

The Grand Jury report contains findings for which the City is required to respond. The original Grand Jury findings are repeated below in italics. The City’s responses are in bold, with additional explanation and commentary in regular typeface. References to the “City” refer to the City of Stanton.

F1 The majority of Orange County jurisdictions have not yet required their haulers to distribute residential containers that meet the CalRecycle standardized colors, leaving legacy and often incorrect or illegible labeling and embossing in place.

The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know what the majority of Orange County jurisdictions do.

F2 While a jurisdiction may not delegate its overall responsibility for compliance with State requirements to a hauler, some jurisdictions have designated the task of imposing the collecting fines from residents to the hauler in accordance with State law. However, not all jurisdictions are clear on who ultimately receives and retains the collected fines.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know how each Orange County jurisdiction delegates its responsibility for either the imposition or collection of fines, or who the ultimate recipient is of any collected fines.

F3 All jurisdictions will eventually start collecting fines from residents for noncompliance, but some have not yet determined whether the revenues will go into a waste and recycling enterprise fund or into the jurisdiction’s general fund.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know what other jurisdictions will do with collected fines.

F4 In most jurisdictions, education and outreach is a joint effort between jurisdiction, hauler, and sometimes consultants, with the jurisdiction reviewing the materials before publication. The methods of dissemination vary by jurisdiction and hauler but frequently rely on a resident actively seeking the information, which requires the resident to have some awareness of the new mandates in the first place.

Most efforts primarily revolve around intermittent hard-copy paper mailings.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know how most jurisdictions will handle education and outreach efforts.

F5 Most jurisdictions currently have no way to accurately determine the effectiveness of their respective education and outreach efforts other than the eventual inspections or audits that will take place.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion.

F6 There is some concern that there are not enough composting facilities in Orange County to process all organic waste, forcing some jurisdictions/haulers to transport it long distances for processing.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion.

F7 There is currently no infrastructure in the county that is a State-approved source of Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) and energy from organic waste. Jurisdictions that use vehicles running on RNG procured from non-approved sources cannot count that RNG towards fulfillment of their procurement requirement.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion.

F8 The formula used by the State to calculate a jurisdiction’s procurement target does not account for the jurisdictions population density or geographic size (square miles). As such, meeting the annual procurement target presents a significant challenge for most jurisdictions.

The respondent agrees with the finding.

F9 Many Orange County jurisdictions were unable to meet the requirement in SB 1383 to reduce organic waste sent to landfills by the 2020 deadline. It is unlikely the required seventy-five percent reduction will be achieved by the 2025 deadline.

The respondent agrees with the finding.

F10 The current procurement requirements mandated by SB 1383 are unrealistic and likely unachievable by most jurisdictions.

The respondent agrees with the finding.

The Grand Jury report contains seven recommendations for which the City is required to respond. Cities are required to respond based on statutorily identified responses.

R1 All jurisdictions should expedite the acquisition and distribution of residential containers that meet the CalRecycle standardized colors. Additionally, until the compliant containers can be distributed, all jurisdictions should ensure the distribution of labeling for non-compliant containers that explain the current SB 1383 requirements applicable to their jurisdiction by June 30, 2025.

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.

The City amended its franchise agreement in September 2023. Section 4.7.6.2 states that CR&R (the City’s franchised hauler) shall 1) furnish new carts such that the colors are compliant with SB 1383 regulations, 2) replace previously colored recycling carts with blue recycling carts, and 3) after January 1, 2032, all carts will be compliant with the color requirements.

R2 By December 31, 2024, all jurisdictions should ensure their waste hauling agreements are in compliance with State statute so that haulers may be designated to perform certain required tasks but are not improperly delegated overall responsibility for compliance. Additionally, all jurisdictions should ensure that any fines collected by a hauler are forwarded to the jurisdiction.

The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.

The City’s franchise agreement does not delegate the overall responsibility for compliance to the City’s hauler. The City does not permit the hauler to collect fines on behalf of the jurisdiction.

R3 The OCGJ recommends that all jurisdictions utilize a dedicated waste and recycling enterprise fund for collection of fines for non-compliance with SB 1383 by December 31, 2024.

The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor.

The City is not planning to segregate funds collected from fines for noncompliance via an enterprise fund. The amount of money does not merit the establishment of a dedicated enterprise fund solely for funds collected from fines relating to SB 1383.

R4 By December 31, 2024, all jurisdictions should diversify the methods and media used for education and outreach to include, among others, various social media platforms, emails to residents, newspaper, television, flyer mailings, community events, and appearances at other public gatherings.

The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.

CR&R has developed a public education plan. This plan includes multimedia distribution and community engagement at public events. A detailed list of activities can be found in Section 5.3.1 of the City’s franchise agreement.

R5 By December 31, 2024, and in order to gauge the effectiveness of their education and outreach efforts, all jurisdictions should develop new methods to engage residents directly to help determine their awareness of the requirements associated with SB 1383, such as surveys, online quizzes, and door-to-door polling.

The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not reasonable.

The City of Stanton does not believe that this recommendation is reasonable by December 31, 2024. The City is currently in the process of disseminating public outreach materials, and the provided deadline does not allow sufficient time to gauge the effectiveness of the program. The City also anticipates challenges when using the suggested forms of data collection. Anticipated challenges include low participation rates, difficulty capturing responses representative of all ages and demographics of the population, and potential responses from nonStanton residents that may participate via social media postings.

R6 By June 30, 2024, the OCGJ recommends that all jurisdictions participate in the OCW&R-led efforts to develop a coordinated county-wide approach to the organics recycling infrastructure and programs as well as procurement requirements associated with SB 1383, working towards creating circular economy as a long-term goal.

The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.

The City responded to the County’s request for an organics capacity planning study. The City also regularly attends quarterly OCWR meetings to stay up-todate with county-wide programs.

R7 By December 31, 2024, the Orange County Board of Supervisors and all Orange County cities should lobby appropriate members of the State Legislature and/or CalRecycle to revise the organic waste diversion targets to better reflect Orange County’s waste amounts, revise the jurisdictions’ procurement requirements to better represent the limited options currently available for procurement, the jurisdictions’ varying populations, population densities, and geographic size, and to delay associated enforcement actions by the State.

The recommendation requires further analysis.

While the City of Stanton is open to the possibility of supporting legislation related to the jurisdiction’s procurement requirements, one concern with the recommendation is that organic waste diversion targets are a set statewide goal, not specifically related to a County or City. In pursuit of meaningful reform, the City plans to investigate SB 1383 lobbying efforts within various organizations to assist jurisdictions in complying with procurement requirements in a more sustainable manner.

Pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the City’s response to the Grand Jury is due on September 10, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities or governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notification provided through the regular agenda process.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

Obj. No. 6: Maintain and promote a responsive, high quality and transparent government.

Prepared by: Han Sol Yoo, Associate Engineer
Reviewed by: Cesar Rangel P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Grand Jury Report “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste” B. City Response to Report
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 3 REASON FOR THE STUDY........................................................................................... 4 METHOD OF STUDY...................................................................................................... 5 INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS................................................................................. 6 Overview of SB 1383.................................................................................................. 6 How Are Jurisdictions Impacted by SB 1383? ........................................................ 7 Orange County Jurisdictions’ SB 1383 Implementation Status............................. 8 How do jurisdictions assess their own progress? ..................................................... 8 Main Implementation Issues ..................................................................................... 8 COMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................... 18 FINDINGS..................................................................................................................... 18 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................. 19 RESPONSES................................................................................................................ 21 Responses Required ............................................................................................... 22 Findings – 90 Day Response Required .................................................................. 22 Recommendations – 90 Day Response Required.................................................. 24 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 25 GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................. 26 APPENDICES............................................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX A – SURVEY RESULTS......................................................................... 28 APPENDIX B – CIRCULAR ECONOMY STARTS IN YOUR KITCHEN................... 33 Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 3

SUMMARY
In 2016, the State of California enacted Senate Bill (SB) 1383, requiring counties, cities, and other organizations responsible for waste collection to coordinate with their residents to divert organic waste, including food scraps, from the landfill waste disposal stream. Another provision makes jurisdictions responsible for procuring a quantity of the recovered organic waste products resulting from the diversion. The 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury (OCGJ) investigated how Orange County jurisdictions are complying with the requirements and goals of SB 1383 that impact single-family residential units.

The investigation revealed that the approaches to meeting SB 1383’s requirements vary greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The majority of Orange County jurisdictions have not yet distributed residential waste containers that meet the SB 1383 standardization requirements, leaving outdated labeling/embossing in place. Education and outreach have not yet taken place at all in some jurisdictions. Even when information has been disseminated in other jurisdictions, the methods disproportionately favor intermittent paper mailings. Also, the State’s unrealistic targets for the procurement of recycled organic waste products do not account for a jurisdiction’s population density or geographic size, which frequently makes them extremely difficult to meet.

The local enforcement stage of SB 1383 started on January 1, 2024. However, the majority of Orange County jurisdictions are unlikely to meet the SB 1383 targeted seventy-five percent reduction in the amount of organic waste sent to landfills by January 2025.

The OCGJ concludes there is a clear need to improve education and outreach efforts, develop enforcement mechanisms and processes, and to coordinate and collaborate among all jurisdictions to collectively address the challenges and to achieve the goals and targets of SB 1383.

BACKGROUND
Organic waste comprises more than a third of the waste stream in California and includes green waste, wood, food waste, and fibers such as paper and cardboard.

When left to decompose in landfills, organic waste releases large amounts of methane gas which is harmful to the environment (CalRecycle, 2024). In September 2016, SB 1383 set reduction targets in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCP) including methane. Simply put, this required all statewide jurisdictions to implement mandatory organic waste collection and recycling to divert organic waste from landfills. Another key benefit of the diversion of organic and other recyclable material from landfills is the preservation of overall landfill capacity.

In 2014, the State conducted random sampling of twenty-six landfills, Material Recovery Facilities (MRF), and Transfer Stations located in twenty-one of California’s fifty-eight counties (none in Orange County). The results were used to establish the baseline for Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 4
the required reduction in organic waste destined for landfills. SB 1383 then set goals to reduce organic waste sent to landfills below the 2014 baseline by fifty percent no later than January 1, 2020, and seventy-five percent by January 1, 2025. However, despite the law’s requirements, the amount of organic waste sent to landfills statewide actually increased by twenty-three percent above the 2014 baseline (Little Hoover Commission, 2023).

SB 1383 requires all jurisdictions to memorialize the bill’s requirements in their municipal codes and ordinances no later than January 1, 2022. One of the results of these changes is that each jurisdiction had to amend or renegotiate their waste haulers’ franchise agreements to incorporate the new requirements.

In accordance with SB 1383, as of January 1, 2024, all jurisdictions (and therefore all waste producers) will be subject to enforcement, including monetary fines. While SB 1383 has a myriad of requirements for commercial as well as residential waste producers, the OCGJ narrowed its investigation to the impacts associated with local jurisdiction compliance with SB 1383 on Orange County residents. This report focuses on the specific requirements associated with SB 1383, the local actions taken so far to meet those requirements, the success of those actions and how they are measured, local agency outreach and education efforts, and the challenges that remain for the County of Orange and the county’s thirty-four cities.

REASON FOR THE STUDY
The organics diversion mandate under SB 1383 began to take effect in California on January 1, 2022. This means that jurisdictions in California were required to implement programs for the separation and diversion of organic waste, including food scraps, from landfill disposal. The actual enforcement of this requirement started on January 1, 2024.

The OCGJ’s intent was to take a closer look at how Orange County jurisdictions are responding to this mandate, their successes and challenges, and the impact of this new requirement on the Orange County residents.

The OCGJ initially focused on two questions:
• What actions have Orange County jurisdictions taken to implement organics collection for their residential customers, and how do they measure the success of these actions?
• Given that one key to the success of SB 1383 is public participation, have local jurisdictions conducted sufficient outreach and education? While investigating the answers to these questions, the OCGJ discovered additional information about Orange County recycling and waste management that is notably relevant to this topic and is included in this report.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 5

METHOD OF STUDY
The OCGJ toured several local waste facilities, including:
• The Frank R. Bowerman landfill in Irvine, owned by the County of Orange and managed and operated by OC Waste & Recycling (OCW&R). This enabled the OCGJ to gain a better understanding of the refuse collection and disposal process.
• The MRF operated by Rainbow Environmental Services, located at 17121 Nichols Lane in the city of Huntington Beach. This facility was previously decommissioned then reopened on short notice when the newer Anaheim MRF was destroyed by fire in February 2022.
• The MRF operated by Waste Management, located at 2050 North Glassell Street in the city of Orange. This tour allowed the OCGJ to gain information on the operation of a newer, larger MRF.

The OCGJ reviewed SB 1383 and related documents, training videos, public meeting recordings, and presentations available on the CalRecycle website.

The OCGJ reviewed online publications from various organizational and media sources related to trash hauling and general operations of the waste and recycling industry and conducted fourteen interviews with representatives from the waste industry, local jurisdictions, and the State’s enforcement agency.

The OCGJ also disseminated a nine-question survey to each of the thirty-four Orange County cities and the County to obtain their perspectives on local implementation of SB 1383. Follow-up interviews were conducted with representatives of the same ten cities included in the 2019-2020 OCGJ report “OC Recycling: Doing it the Right Way” and the County for additional insight into each jurisdiction’s implementation of, and compliance with, SB 1383’s requirements.

The OCGJ utilized the same sampling of ten cities as well as the County of Orange (for its unincorporated areas) because they represent different geographical areas of the county (from Brea in the north to Dana Point in the south) and reflect a variety of larger cities by population and/or land area (e.g., Santa Ana, Irvine) and some that are smaller (e.g., Buena Park, Mission Viejo).

Individual members of the OCGJ also observed the types and colors of carts, their labeling, and their contents at various locations throughout the county. These observations were documented via photographs to illustrate dissimilar details and nuances among jurisdictions and haulers.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 6

INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS
Overview of SB 1383
SB 1383 set ambitious targets for reducing organic waste disposal in landfills from the 2014 baseline: fifty percent by January 2020 (which was not met), and seventy-five percent by January 2025. Organic waste comprises more than half the waste stream in California and includes green waste, wood, food waste, and fibers such as paper and cardboard. When left to decompose in landfills, organic waste releases large amounts of methane gas. The overall goal of the bill is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least four million metric tons per year by 2030 by requiring that “organics” going to the landfill be reduced to 5.7 million metric tons by 2025.

This groundbreaking legislation is a statewide effort to reduce Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPs). SLCPs such as methane, black carbon, tropospheric (ground level) ozone, and hydrofluorocarbons remain in the atmosphere for a shorter time than carbon dioxide but have a much stronger warming effect. Therefore, reducing SLCPs has the potential to significantly slow global climate change in the near term (California Air Resources Board, 2024). The State’s efforts and policies are intended to substantially increase the rate of organic material diversion away from landfills. This diversion goal is meant to move the State towards the desired “circular economy” where organic waste is collected, converted into new materials or products, and reused for other purposes.

Figure 1 Source: CalRecycle
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 7
How Are Jurisdictions Impacted by SB 1383?
In this context, a jurisdiction may be a city, county, city and county, or special district that collects solid waste.

The jurisdictions’ responsibilities specified by SB 1383 relating to residential units include (CalRecycle, 2024):
• Providing organics collection services to all residents • Conducting education and outreach to community
• Procuring recyclable and recovered organic products
• Securing access to recycling capacity
• Monitoring compliance and conducting enforcement
SB 1383 contains a significant amount of detail regarding the types of allowable collection programs. Critical requirements are listed below:
• Each resident must subscribe to an organic waste collection service that either “source-separates” the waste by using separate bins or transports all unsegregated waste to a facility that recovers seventy-five percent of the organic content collected.
• SB 1383 requires one of the following collection options:

A one-can system – all contents are transported to a facility that recovers seventy-five percent of the organic content.

A two-can system – at least one of the containers (whichever includes organic waste and garbage) must be transported to a facility that recovers seventyfive percent of the organic content.

A three-can system – organic waste is required to be source separated (recyclables in blue, food and yard waste in green).

Jurisdictions must also conduct education and outreach to all residents regarding collection service requirements, contamination standards, self-haul requirements, and overall compliance with SB 1383. Educational material must be linguistically accessible to non-English speaking residents.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 8
Figure 2 Source: CalRecycle
Orange County Jurisdictions’ SB 1383 Implementation Status How do jurisdictions assess their own progress?
The OCGJ sent a ten-question survey to thirty-four cities and OC Waste & Recycling (OCW&R) and received thirty-one responses. The purpose of the survey was to verify how these agencies measure their progress on the implementation of various aspects of SB 1383. Survey participants were asked to mark their progress on the scale from 1 (significant challenges) to 5 (excellent) for each of the questions. The survey questions as well as more detailed information on responses and follow-up comments and explanations is included in Appendix A.

Main Implementation Issues
To follow-up on the survey, the OCGJ conducted a series of interviews with jurisdictions to learn more about their specific challenges in implementing SB 1383, successes, concerns, and solutions to common issues. The eleven jurisdictions interviewed were the same included in the 2019-2020 OCGJ report “OC Recycling: Doing it the Right Way” representing different geographical areas of the county and a variety of populations and/or land areas. Several themes emerged from the interviews:
• Container Standardization
SB 1383 requires standardized colors for residential and business curbside containers (green for organics, blue for recyclables, and grey for trash). It also requires container Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 9
labels on new containers. The color scheme for collection containers must meet either of these requirements:
o The lid of the container is the correct designated color o The body of the container is the correct designated color, and the lid is also the same specified color or may be gray or black
Out of the eleven jurisdictions interviewed, only two have distributed containers that meet the State requirements. However, jurisdictions are not required to replace containers prior to January 1, 2036. Most are replacing their containers gradually over time. The variety of colors used by various jurisdictions contributes to the confusion and potentially increases contamination rates. In many cases, existing containers include embossed information that is no longer accurate or labels with outdated information (see examples below).

Figure 3. The embossed information wrongly directs residents to put plastic grocery bags in the recycling container. Photo: OCGJ Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 10
Figure 4. The old sticker incorrectly directs residents to put shoes, clothes, and other textiles in the recycling container. Photo: OCGJ Figure 5. Outside label on the ‘green waste’ container contains no information regarding food scraps. Photo: OCGJ
The following two images of the “Food Scrap” container (outside and inside) were taken by an OCGJ member in a public park. The contents of the container, which contains unallowable items, such as plastic packaging, further underscores the need for clear signage and more public education.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 11
Figure 6. Lid of the “Food Scraps” container in a public park from November 2023 showing correct information. Photo: OCGJ
Figure 7. Contents of the same “Food Scraps” container in the public park from November 2023. Photo: OCGJ
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 12
Another standardization issue is that what is accepted for recycling varies among the jurisdictions and haulers.

For example, some allow palm fronds into organics bins while others do not, and some allow food scraps to be deposited in compostable bags while others do not, further adding to the confusion.
• Funding and Enforcement
While conducting interviews with the Orange County jurisdictions, the OCGJ learned that there are two approaches to funding their solid waste management programs (including SB 1383 implementation activities): (1) using an enterprise fund; and (2) using the general fund. Using an enterprise fund ensures that all revenues generated by the solid waste management program are reinvested in that program rather than being diverted into other needs of the jurisdiction.

Even though enforcement activities were effective starting January 1, 2024, jurisdictions only conduct inspections and spot-checks of residential customers’ organic and trash containers using either “lid flipping” or smart trucks that record the contents of the containers as they are being emptied. Haulers (via contracts) have been designated to perform these functions. If residents are found to be in violation, the first step is to provide them with additional educational materials and information. If the violation persists, warning notices are issued. The final step is issuing fines. The penalties imposed by a jurisdiction are based on Government Code Sections 53069.4, 25132, and 36900, and are as follows:
• First violation: $50-$100 per violation;
• Second violation: $100-$200 per violation;
• Third or subsequent violation: $250-$500 per violation Penalties increase when an entity violates the same requirement within a one-year period (CalRecycle, 2024).

While jurisdictions have yet to collect fines, some have not even established the collection protocol or the account where collected fines will be deposited. • Education and Outreach
Clearly, there is a need for more education and outreach. The success of SB 1383 implementation and the ability to reach the CalRecycle goal of a seventy-five percent diversion rate depend largely on residents’ compliance and behavior change. Education and outreach is the first and most critical component of that change. “The accuracy of consumer disposal decisions directly influences the performance of the recycling system.” (Christian Blanco C. S., 2023) Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 13
Most interviewed jurisdictions collaborate with haulers to create and distribute educational materials. Others also use consulting services for that purpose. Outreach strategies, the number of outreach events and communications, as well as participation rates vary greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but most rely heavily on paper mailings, which may not be the most effective way of reaching the public. If combined with junk mail, the educational material may go unread into a recycling bin, if not the trash. Frequently, the information flyers are mailed together with hard-copy utility bills, which may overlook those who subscribe to electronic billing.

As part of their outreach/education campaigns, some of the interviewed jurisdictions purchased kitchen pails for recycling food scraps to distribute to some or all households.

These purchases were funded through SB 1383 assistance grants from CalRecycle, which most of the Orange County jurisdictions applied for and received.

The OCGJ reviewed a sampling of educational materials being distributed by several cities and concluded that the quality of these materials can range from highly informative publications with accessible and attractive designs to flimsy “newsletters” issued by haulers for their respective jurisdictions with graphics and instructions that are barely legible.

Paper mailings have their role but represent only one of many possible outreach methods. The recycling industry itself is embracing technological advancements, including the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), in waste sorting, predicting trends, the use of smart hauler trucks and smart bins, as well as in outreach and education (Recycling Inside, 2023).

According to Recycling Inside, “AI can play a pivotal role in educating the public about recycling practices. Chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI can provide real-time guidance on waste disposal, recycling guidelines, and collection schedules. By engaging with individuals through personalized interactions, AI-driven platforms can raise awareness, promote recycling behavior, and facilitate proper waste management at the consumer level.”
According to research by the Recycling Partnership, “People have a misconception that what is recyclable doesn’t change. They are recycling incorrectly in some cases because they are basing decisions on past guidelines and recycling knowledge such as believing milk cartons are wax coated and should not be recycled, or envelopes with windows should not be recycled. They think they know what they need to know about recycling because that’s what they’ve always known.” (Center for Sustainable Behavior & Impact, 2022)
More than seventy percent of people surveyed wish there was an easier way to get information on what can and can’t be recycled in their community. (Center for Sustainable Behavior & Impact, 2022)
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 14
Determining the success of their outreach efforts is another challenge that Orange County jurisdictions are facing in the near future. Most jurisdictions need to determine how to measure outreach efforts, as the enforcement started January 1, 2024. Having common standards and methods to measure the success of public education and compliance, and regularly posting this information on the jurisdiction’s website related to SB 1383 goals, will give the public an incentive to comply with SB 1383. However, in the interim, there is a significant amount of visual evidence regarding the level of residents’ confusion as evidenced by the photo below. The photo is the amount of waste in the first five hours of a workday that was improperly included in residential recyclable containers and delivered to a MRF, where it had to be hand sorted out.

Figure 8: Waste improperly included in recyclable containers Photo: OCGJ • Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products
Representatives from most of the jurisdictions the OCGJ interviewed indicated that meeting the procurement requirements of SB 1383 is challenging. This is due to their jurisdictions’ State-calculated procurement targets far exceeding the quantity of recovered organic waste products that they can utilize.

To comply with SB 1383, jurisdictions must procure recovered organic waste products to meet an annual procurement target. Recovered organic waste products include:
o Compost
o Mulch
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 15
o Renewable energy (transportation fuel, electricity, and gas for heating) from anaerobic digestion
o Electricity from biomass conversion
Each jurisdiction’s procurement target is calculated by multiplying its population, as reported by the California Department of Finance, by the per capita procurement target (0.08 tons of organic waste per California resident per year).

The resulting procurement target can then be multiplied by product conversion factors (as established by the regulations) to determine the annual procurement requirements for recovered organic waste products.

Source: CalRecycle
As one of the survey respondents stated:
“Meeting the annual procurement target presents a significant challenge. In addition, the formula used to calculate a jurisdiction’s procurement target does not account for density or square miles. Denser areas equal less space to distribute mulch or compost.

More people equals higher procurement target.”
As a result, a number of jurisdictions with high procurement targets had to use grant funding to purchase the required amounts of compost/mulch. Because the required target procurement amounts exceeded what they can utilize in their communities, they had to distribute the compost/mulch (via hauler) to agricultural communities outside Orange County. They also admitted that without grant funding, meeting the targets will be even more difficult and will require diverting resources from their own communities or raising rates.

The regulations limit procurement to “use or giveaway, and do not include the sale of products [14CCR Section 18993.1(e)(1)] so jurisdictions cannot sell the procured recovered organic waste products, such as compost, via a third party.” (CalRecycle, 2022)
Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) is one of the products that can be counted towards meeting a jurisdiction’s procurement goal. Haulers operating in Orange County, including Republic, CR&R, and Waste Management, utilize trucks powered by RNG.

However, in most cases the RNG they use is not purchased from an approved facility so it cannot be counted towards the required procurement goal. CalRecycle maintains a list of anaerobic digestion facilities in California to help jurisdictions find renewable gas that may be eligible towards their SB 1383 procurement obligations.

Currently, this list contains only six facilities that produce Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), which in this case is presumably compressed RNG. None of these facilities is located in Orange County. The closest are located in Riverside County (Perris), San Bernardino County (Victorville and Rialto), and San Diego County (Escondido).

The issue of RNG is further complicated by the fact that some sewage treatment plants also produce RNG, which (according to CalRecycle) is mostly ineligible. Below is the Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 16
information included in “Frequently Asked Questions” on RNG on the CalRecycle website (CalRecycle, 2022):

Renewable gas derived solely from sewage is ineligible for meeting the procurement target because a Publicly Owned Treatment Work (POTW) is not a solid waste facility and therefore not in the scope of the legislative intent of SB 1383. Sewage is also not typically destined for a landfill, so its use does not help achieve the landfill diversion goals.

However, Title 14 explicitly authorizes POTWs to accept food waste without a solid waste facility permit, making it functionally similar to incentivizing biomethane from a solid waste facility. Therefore, it is justifiable to allow the portion of renewable gas resulting from the digestion of food waste at POTWs to count toward the procurement targets, provided the POTW accepts food waste from specified facilities or operations [see 14 CCR Section 18993.1(h)(1)] and meets all other applicable regulatory requirements. For more information, please see the Final Statement of Purpose and Necessity (pages 178-180).

The issue of procurement difficulties encountered by California jurisdictions is mentioned in the Little Hoover Commission 2023 report on the implementation of SB 1383. The Commission recommended that “the state should expand the list of compliance pathways and products eligible to count toward a jurisdiction’s procurement requirements.” (Little Hoover Commission, 2023)
• Coordination and Vision for the Future
In a county with thirty-four cities and several other jurisdictions, coordination, collaboration, and sharing resources and best practices can be a challenge. The OCGJ learned that county-wide groups meet on a regular basis, including a waste management coordinators’ group, a haulers’ group, and a market development group.

Additionally, the OCGJ learned that OCW&R has assumed a leadership role in positioning Orange County for a greener, more sustainable future.

OCW&R has a clear vision for a regional, county-wide approach to the implementation of SB 1383, which includes not only organics and edible food strategies, but also market creation and development, procurement and compliance, and regional standardization and collaboration.

The details of their vision are outlined in the 2024 presentation to the legislative group, which is available on the OCW&R website (OC Waste & Recycling, 2024).

The following slide has been taken from this presentation.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 17
Figure 9. Circular economy concept for Orange County Source: OCW&R • Other Issues
Multi-family housing units: While not within the scope of this report, it should be noted that services to multi-family units still pose a significant challenge. Jurisdictions are required to provide organic waste collection to multi-family units. Many find it difficult to provide a three-bin source-separated service to these units due to limited space.

Creative solutions, such as providing smaller organics containers or containers that are placed in a common area to serve multiple units, have been utilized by Orange County cities, but full compliance is difficult to achieve.

The cost of SB 1383 implementation: The Little Hoover Commission Report states that the gross cost of implementation was determined to be $40 billion between 2019 and 2030. (CalRecycle, 2019) “About 5 percent of this figure represents soft costs (i.e. the work local jurisdictions must do to create organic waste programs, educate the public, and ensure health, safety, and quality control measures are met). The other 95 percent represents the cost of disposing of organic waste, including constructing infrastructure” (Little Hoover Commission, 2023). Most Orange County jurisdictions interviewed by the OCGJ indicated that they had to increase their residential and/or business waste collection rates to cover the cost of expanded services mandated by SB 1383.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 18

COMMENDATIONS
• County of Orange, OC Waste & Recycling is commended for having successfully met SB 1383 mandates, developing new composting infrastructure, a model education and outreach program, moving towards robust and repurposing recycling programs, and developing gas-to-energy facilities to produce renewable energy.
• City of Mission Viejo, Solid Waste Program is commended for their proactive implementation of SB 1383 mandates, distributing compliant waste containers to all residents, and producing a robust outreach and education program using numerous delivery methods.
• City of Santa Ana Public Works, Trash and Recycling Program is commended for proactively revising their hauler contract to meet SB 1383 requirements, producing a notable and ongoing outreach and education program, distributing compliant waste containers to all residents, and fostering a highly collaborative relationship with their hauler.

FINDINGS
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2023-2024 Grand Jury requires responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.

Based on its investigation titled “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste,” the 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury has arrived at the following principal findings:

Container Standardization
F1. The majority of Orange County jurisdictions have not yet required their haulers to distribute residential containers that meet the CalRecycle standardized colors, leaving legacy and often incorrect or illegible labeling and embossing in place.

Funding and Enforcement
F2. While a jurisdiction may not delegate its overall responsibility for compliance with State requirements to a hauler, some jurisdictions have designated the task of imposing and collecting fines from residents to the hauler in accordance with State law. However, not all jurisdictions are clear on who ultimately receives and retains the collected fines.

F3. All jurisdictions will eventually start collecting fines from residents for noncompliance, but some have not yet determined whether the revenues will go into a waste and recycling enterprise fund or into the jurisdiction’s general fund.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 19
Education and Outreach
F4. In most jurisdictions, education and outreach is a joint effort between jurisdiction, hauler, and sometimes consultants, with the jurisdiction reviewing the materials before publication. The methods of dissemination vary by jurisdiction and hauler but frequently rely on a resident actively seeking the information, which requires the resident to have some awareness of the new mandates in the first place.

Most efforts primarily revolve around intermittent hard-copy paper mailings.

F5. Most jurisdictions currently have no way to accurately determine the effectiveness of their respective education and outreach efforts other than the eventual inspections or audits that will take place.

Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products
F6. There is some concern that there are not enough composting facilities in Orange County to process all organic waste, forcing some jurisdictions/haulers to transport it long distances for processing.

F7. There is currently no infrastructure in the county that is a State-approved source of Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) and energy from organic waste. Jurisdictions that use vehicles running on RNG procured from non-approved sources cannot count that RNG towards fulfillment of their procurement requirement.

F8. The formula used by the State to calculate a jurisdiction's procurement target does not account for a jurisdiction’s population density or geographic size (square miles). As such, meeting the annual procurement target presents a significant challenge for most jurisdictions.

F9. Many Orange County jurisdictions were unable to meet the requirement in SB 1383 to reduce organic waste sent to landfills by the 2020 deadline. It is unlikely the required seventy-five percent reduction will be achieved by the 2025 deadline.

F10. The current procurement requirements mandated by SB 1383 are unrealistic and likely unachievable by most jurisdictions.

RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2023-2024 Grand Jury requires responses from each agency affected by the recommendations presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 20
Based on its investigation titled “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste,” the 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury makes the following recommendations:

Container Standardization
R1. All jurisdictions should expedite the acquisition and distribution of residential containers that meet the CalRecycle standardized colors. Additionally, until the compliant containers can be distributed, all jurisdictions should ensure the distribution of labeling for non-compliant containers that explain the current SB 1383 requirements applicable to their jurisdiction by June 30, 2025.

Funding and Enforcement
R2. By December 31, 2024, all jurisdictions should ensure their waste hauling agreements are in compliance with State statute so that haulers may be designated to perform certain required tasks but are not improperly delegated overall responsibility for compliance. Additionally, all jurisdictions should ensure that any fines collected by a hauler are forwarded to the jurisdiction.

R3. The OCGJ recommends that all jurisdictions utilize a dedicated waste and recycling enterprise fund for collection of fines for non-compliance with SB 1383 by December 31, 2024.

Education and Outreach
R4. By December 31, 2024, all jurisdictions should diversify the methods and media used for education and outreach to include, among others, various social media platforms, emails to residents, newspaper, television, flyer mailings, community events, and appearances at other public gatherings.

R5. By December 31, 2024, and in order to gauge the effectiveness of their education and outreach efforts, all jurisdictions should develop new methods to engage residents directly to help determine their awareness of the requirements associated with SB 1383, such as surveys, online quizzes, and door-to-door polling.

Procurement of Recovered Organic Waste Products
R6. By June 30, 2025, the OCGJ recommends that all jurisdictions participate in the OCW&R-led efforts to develop a coordinated county-wide approach to the organics recycling infrastructure and programs as well as procurement requirements associated with SB 1383, working towards creating circular economy as a long-term goal.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 21
R7. By December 31, 2024, the Orange County Board of Supervisors and all Orange County cities should lobby appropriate members of the State Legislature and/or CalRecycle to revise the organic waste diversion targets to better reflect Orange County’s waste amounts, revise the jurisdictions’ procurement requirements to better represent the limited options currently available for procurement, the jurisdictions’ varying populations, population densities, and geographic size, and to delay associated enforcement actions by the State.

RESPONSES
The following excerpts from the California Penal Code provide the requirements for public agencies to respond to the Findings and Recommendations of this Grand Jury report:

Section 933
(c) No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body, and every elected county officer or agency head for which the grand jury has responsibility pursuant to Section 914.1 shall comment within 60 days to the presiding judge of the superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or controls. In any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and recommendations. All of these comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who impaneled the grand jury. A copy of all responses to grand jury reports shall be placed on file with the clerk of the public agency and the office of the county clerk, or the mayor when applicable, and shall remain on file in those offices. One copy shall be placed on file with the applicable grand jury final report by, and in the control of the currently impaneled grand jury, where it shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.

Section 933.05.
(a) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following:
(1) The respondent agrees with the finding.
(2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons thereof.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 22
(b) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions:
(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.
(2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.
(3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report.
(4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation, thereof.

Responses Required
Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with Penal Code Section 933.05 are required from:

Findings – 90 Day Response Required
OC Board of Supervisors: F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10 City Councils of:

Aliso Viejo F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Anaheim F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Brea F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Buena Park F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Costa Mesa F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Cypress F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Dana Point F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Fountain Valley F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10 Fullerton F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 23
Garden Grove F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Huntington Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10 Irvine F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
La Habra F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
La Palma F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Laguna Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Laguna Hills F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Laguna Niguel F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Laguna Woods F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Lake Forest F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Los Alamitos F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Mission Viejo F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Newport Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Orange F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Placentia F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Rancho Santa Margarita F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10 San Clemente F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
San Juan Capistrano F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10 Seal Beach F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Stanton F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Tustin F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Villa Park F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Westminster F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 24
Yorba Linda F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10
Recommendations – 90 Day Response Required
OC Board of Supervisors: R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
City Councils of:

Aliso Viejo R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Anaheim R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Brea R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Buena Park R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Costa Mesa R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Cypress R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Dana Point R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Fountain Valley R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Fullerton R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Garden Grove R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Huntington Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Irvine R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
La Habra R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
La Palma R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Laguna Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Laguna Hills R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Laguna Niguel R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Laguna Woods R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Lake Forest R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Los Alamitos R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Mission Viejo R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Newport Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Orange R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 25
Placentia R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Rancho Santa Margarita R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
San Clemente R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
San Juan Capistrano R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Seal Beach R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Stanton R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Tustin R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Villa Park R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Westminster R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7
Yorba Linda R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7

REFERENCES
California Air Resources Board. (2024). Short-Lived Climate Pollutants. Retrieved from https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/slcp/about
CalRecycle. (2019, October 2). Initial Statement of Reasons Appendix A: Cost Update.

Retrieved from CalRecycle: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Docs/Web/115980 CalRecycle. (2022, December 5). Procurement Questions and Answers. Retrieved from CalRecycle: https://calrecycle.ca.gov/organics/slcp/faq/recycledproducts / CalRecycle. (2023). SB1383 Education and Outreach Resources. Retrieved from CalRecicle: https://calrecycle.ca.gov/organics/slcp/education/ CalRecycle. (2024). 2022 State of Disposal and Recycling Report. Sacramento:

Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Retrieved from https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Publications/Details/1732 CalRecycle. (2024). Enforcement Questions and Answers. Retrieved from https://calrecycle.ca.gov/organics/slcp/faq/enforcement/ CalRecycle. (2024). SB 1383 Education and Outreach Resources. Retrieved from https://calrecycle.ca.gov/organics/slcp/education/
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 26
Center for Sustainable Behavior & Impact. (2022). Consumer Insights on Packaging, Labels, and Claims for Recycling. The Recycling Partnership. Retrieved from https://recyclingpartnership.org/wpcontent/uploads/dlm_uploads/2023/06/Consumer_Labeling_Research_Final.pdf Christian Blanco, C. S. (2023, May 30). America's Broken Recycling System. Retrieved from California Management Review : https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2023/05/americas-broken-recycling-system/ Christian Blanco, C. S. (2023, May 30). Is it Time to Consider a National Recycling Standard? California Management Review. Retrieved from
https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2023/05/is-it-time-to-consider-a-national-recyclingstandard / Little Hoover Commission. (2023). Reducing California's Landfill Methane Emissions:

SB1383 Implementation. Sacramento: Little Hoover Commission.

Mouchard, A. (2024, May 4). Tech meets trash in Orange County’s landfill future.

Orange County Register. Retrieved from
https://www.ocregister.com/2024/05/04/tech-meets-trash-in-orange-countyslandfill-future/ OC Waste & Recycling. (2024). OCW&R. Retrieved from OCW&R:
https://oclandfills.com/sites/ocwr/files/2024-
03/1383%20IMAGINE%20WHAT%20CAN%20BE%20Presentaiton.pdf
Recycling Inside. (2023, June 2). Revolutionizing Recycling: The Relevance of Artificial Intelligence in the Recycling Industry. Retrieved from
https://recyclinginside.com/the-relevance-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-recyclingindustry/ Savage, S. (2023, February 16). Forbes. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensavage/2023/02/16/the-golden-statescircular-economy-goals-is-that-just-california-dreamin-or-thefuture/?sh=95c357338e58

GLOSSARY
AB Assembly Bill
CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 27
Circular Economy Current economic models consist of acquiring materials, making them into products, and then those products become waste. A circular economy reduces material use, redesigns materials and products to be less resource intensive, and recaptures “waste” as a resource to manufacture new materials and products.

Compost Compost is made from a variety of organic materials and is used to add nutrients and improve soil structure by mixing it into the soil.

Mulch Mulch is typically made from a single material like straw, grass clippings, or wood chips and is spread on top of the soil to suppress weeds, retain moisture, regulate soil temperature, and protect plant roots.

MRF Material Recovery Facility
OCGJ Orange County Grand Jury
OCW&R OC Waste & Recycling, a department of the County of Orange Organic Waste Solid wastes originated from living organisms and their metabolic waste products, and from petroleum, which contain naturally produced organic compounds, and which are biologically
decomposable by microbial and fungal action into the constituent compounds of water, carbon dioxide, and other simpler organic compounds. Sometimes called biodegradable waste.

ORNGE Organics to Natural Gas and Energy
POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Work
Recycling Using waste as material to manufacture a new product. Recycling involves altering the physical form of an object or material and making a new object from the altered material.

RNG Renewable Natural Gas
SB Senate Bill
SLCP Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
Solid Waste Discarded or abandoned materials. Solid wastes can be solid, liquid, semi-solid or containerized gaseous material.

Waste Objects or materials for which no use or reuse is intended.

Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 28

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – SURVEY RESULTS
Survey participants were asked to mark their progress on a scale from 1 (significant challenges) to 5 (excellent progress) for each of the nine questions. On the following bar graphs, the ‘x’ axis (horizontal) depicts the rating scale from 1 to 5. The ‘y’ axis (vertical) represents the number of respondents that gave themselves a particular rating.

Was your city successful in meeting the goal of reducing organic waste disposal 50% by 2020?
Are you confident that your city will meet the goal of reducing organic waste 75% by 2025?
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 29
How would you rate your city's success in providing organic waste collection services to all residents?
How successful is your city in recycling these organic materials? How would you rate your confidence that city residents have been educated to have sufficient knowledge of the composting requirements (and associated restrictions) with the proper disposal of yard trimmings and food scraps?
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 30
How successful was your city in procuring a quantity of recovered organic waste products annually?
How would you rate your city's success in meeting the record-keeping requirements associated with SB1383, including but not limited to, inspection and enforcement, compliance reviews, investigation of complaints, and alleged violations? How satisfied are you that your current agreements(s) with the hauler(s) that service your city are adequate to comply with all provisions of residential services required by SB1383?
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 31
Are your city's current staffing levels that are, or will become, responsible for all aspects of full SB1383 compliance adequate to meet the tasks at hand? The following examples of additional comments or explanations for their answers to the questions above were provided by survey respondents:
“Comprehensive implementation and effective management of SB 1383 would require additional resources and financial support. Despite our [jurisdiction’s] proactive approach, including securing a new hauler/franchise agreement . . . that aligns with SB 1383's requirements and achieving near-complete adoption of these guidelines, there remains a widespread reluctance towards organic recycling. Ongoing educational efforts are in place and will continue; however, achieving significant behavioral change and compliance will require additional resources.”
“[Our jurisdiction has] been working on compliance regarding SB 1383 with new franchise agreements, building out local infrastructure, meeting the SB 619 procurement targets, providing education and outreach, programs are being implemented to incrementally improve participation and increase diversion. We are increasing staffing levels to help with continued support for compliance as it requires increased effort for more inspections, waste characterizations, more education and outreach, further program development, market creation and development for compost and mulch, inspections, education, and enforcement support. Although meeting the 75% goal requires more heavy lifting, I anticipate we will see incremental improvements from our efforts.”
“SB 1383 has proven to challenge the recycling habits of many throughout the [jurisdiction]. Through updated franchise agreements . . . and CalRecycle grant funding, we have been able to educate and encourage change in disposal habits as required via SB 1383. Additional outreach outlining the requirements and benefits of recycling organic material will be key in successfully transitioning residents and business owners to recycle organic material.”
“[We] started a new franchise agreement after an RFP process . . . . This allowed us to incorporate all hauler-related SB 1383 compliance activities and select an innovative Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 32
organic waste collection program. We are facing procurement challenges as energy related products are not readily available (particularly) RNG for collection vehicles.

Staffing may prove to be a challenge, depending upon the amount of complaints, inspections, and enforcement actions we are required to address.” “Procurement [is our] biggest challenge.”
“Our agreement with [the hauler] required that they implement 1383 compliant programming immediately for residential. It also includes education/outreach, contamination monitoring, purchase or compost/mulch on our behalf. Residential 3-cart was implemented on day one of the agreement. However, even with education, residents are hesitant to participate with food in the organics container due to not being allowed to use compostable bags and therefore attracting bugs and vermin.” “Meeting the annual procurement target presents a significant challenge. [The hauler’s] collection trucks are fueled with RNG. The RNG purchased is California produced, though not SB 1383 qualified. In addition, the formula used to calculate a jurisdiction’s procurement target does not count for density or square miles. Denser areas equal less space to distribute mulch or compost. More people equals higher procurement target.” “As with any new program where you need to change habits and behavior, it is going to a long-term project to get adults in the habit of separating their food scraps. State of CA should implement a statewide outreach campaign, and not just rely on local jurisdictions to provide all the outreach.”
Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 33
APPENDIX B – CIRCULAR ECONOMY STARTS IN YOUR KITCHEN

Circular conomy at or
David J. Shawver
Mayor
Carol Warren
Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Warren
Council Member
Gary Taylor
Council Member
Donald Torres
Council Member
Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Phone (714) 379-9222
Fax (714) 890-1443
www.stanton.ca.gov
August 27, 2024
Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
700 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Honorable Judge Maria Hernandez:

The City of Stanton received the 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury report entitled “Talking Trash: Recyclables and Organic Waste”. As required by California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the City of Stanton is responding to the findings and recommendations included in the report.

Note: The original Grand Jury findings are repeated below in italics. The City’s responses are in bold, with additional explanation and commentary in regular typeface. References to the “City” refer to the City of Stanton, California.

Findings
F1 The majority of Orange County jurisdictions have not yet required their haulers to distribute residential containers that meet the CalRecycle standardized colors, leaving legacy and often incorrect or illegible labeling and embossing in place.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know what the majority of Orange County jurisdictions do.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The answer may vary depending on the facts of each specific case. How large is each Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know what other jurisdictions will do with collected fines.

Most efforts primarily revolve around intermittent hard-copy paper mailings.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know how most jurisdictions will handle education and outreach efforts.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion.

The respondent agrees with the finding.

F10 The current procurement requirements mandated by SB 1383 are unrealistic and likely unachievable by most jurisdictions.

The respondent agrees with the finding.

Recommendations
R1 All jurisdictions should expedite the acquisition and distribution of residential containers that meet the CalRecycle standardized colors. Additionally, until the compliant containers can be distributed, all jurisdictions should ensure the distribution of labeling for non-compliant containers that explain the current SB 1383 requirements applicable to their jurisdiction by June 30, 2025.

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.

The City amended its franchise agreement in September 2023. Section 4.7.6.2 states that the CR&R (the City’s franchised hauler) shall 1) furnish new carts such that the colors are compliant with SB 1383 regulations, 2) replace previously colored recycling carts with blue recycling carts, and 3) after January 1, 2032, all carts will be compliant with color requirements.

The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.

R3 The OCGJ recommends that all jurisdictions utilize a dedicated waste and recycling enterprise fund for collection of fines for non-compliance with SB 1383 by December 31, 2024.

The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor.

The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.

The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not reasonable.

The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.

The City responded to the County’s request for an organics capacity planning study. The City also regularly attends quarterly OCWR meetings to stay up-todate with county-wide programs.

The recommendation requires further analysis.

Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager, at (714) 890-4277 or via email at [email protected].

Respectfully,
David J. Shawver
Mayor
Cc: Orange County Grand Jury
700 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701

CITY OF STANTON

On June 20, 2024, the Orange County Grand Jury released a report entitled “E-bikes Friend or Foe” (Attachment A). The report focused on E-bike regulation, education, and safety and what, if any, pertinent regulations have been adopted by Orange County cities. California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05 require any public agency that the Grand Jury reviews respond to the findings and recommendations of the Grand Jury Report. The City’s proposed response letter responds to each of the applicable findings and recommendations (Attachment B).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities or governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

BACKGROUND:

The ease of use, relatively low price, and convenience of E-bikes have led to their proliferation throughout Orange County. It is estimated that the sales of E-bikes rose by 145% during 2020 to 2021 (World Economic Forum March 12, 2021). To better understand the state of associated regulations related to E-bikes, the Orange County Grand Jury conducted the following activities:
• In-person interviews of representatives from:
o A major retail bike shop that sells both E-bikes and standard bicycles o The Orange County Transportation Authority
Item: 9I
Click here to return to the agenda.
o The Orange County Sheriff's Department
o The Central Newport Beach Community Association
• In-person attendance and online viewing of several city council meetings • In-person attendance at a training session hosted by a local city • Review of proposed State legislation that failed, passed, or is in committee • Direct observation of E-bike riders, where they are riding, use of protective gear, passengers, dangerous maneuvers, etc.
• An online survey was distributed to the mayors of 34 cities in Orange County.

Unincorporated areas/divisions were not included in this survey. Mayors and/or representatives from 22 cities responded to this survey.

The Orange County Grand Jury released the “E-bikes Friend or Foe” report on June 20, 2024. The Orange County Grand Jury determined that there is wide variation of rules on E-bikes and limited information regarding the reporting of E-bike incidents, accidents, injuries, and basic rules of the road for E-bikes.

ANALYSIS AND JUSTIFICATION:

F1 The majority of Orange County’s 34 cities do not have ordinances or policies in place, which makes it difficult to address the safe operation and regulation of Ebikes leading to confusion.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City does not know what ordinances or policies related to the operation and regulation of E-bikes the majority of Orange County cities have.

F2 Due to the increasing incidence of E-bike injuries and deaths, there is a need for consistent and accurate tracking by law enforcement and first responders, which does not exist now.

The City lacks knowledge and information sufficient to reach this conclusion. The City is not fully informed as to the existing, if any, tracking by law enforcement and first responders of E-bike-related injuries and deaths.

F3 Training and education on E-bike use and safety varies from city to city causing confusion amongst bike riders.

The respondent agrees with the finding.

The Grand Jury report contains seven recommendations for which the City is required to respond. Cities are required to respond based on statutorily identified responses.

R1 Each Orange County city should have specific policies that define the rules of the road for use of E-bikes in their communities by December 1, 2024.

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.

The City will assign its Public Safety Committee to research and review existing E-bike policies from Orange County cities, and will request a draft policy to be prepared for presentation to the City Council with proposed adoption by December 1, 2024.

R2 Each Orange County city should have a mechanism in place to report accidents, injuries and deaths involving E-bikes by December 1, 2024.

The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer of head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report.

Rather than initially creating a stand-alone solution, the City will assess what other Orange County cities utilize to report the requested data.

R3 Each Orange County city should research and develop outreach and education programs regarding the safe operation of E-bikes for their residents by December 1, 2024.

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.

The City will research and develop outreach and education programs in partnership with the OCSD by December 1, 2024.

Pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the City’s response to the Grand Jury is due on September 18, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notification provided through the regular agenda process.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

Obj. No. 6: Maintain and promote a responsive, high quality and transparent government.

Prepared by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Attachments:

A. Grand Jury Report “E-bikes Friend or Foe”
B. City Response to Report
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page ii
Table of Contents
SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 1 REASON FOR THE STUDY........................................................................................... 3 METHOD OF STUDY...................................................................................................... 3 INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS................................................................................. 4 Orange County Transportation Authority................................................................ 4 Orange County Sheriff’s Department....................................................................... 4 Cities Survey .............................................................................................................. 4 COMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................... 12 FINDINGS..................................................................................................................... 12 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................. 13 RESPONSES................................................................................................................ 13 REQUIRED RESPONSES......................................................................................... 14 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 18 GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................. 20 APPENDICES............................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX 1.............................................................................................................. 21 Current County of Orange E-Bike Laws - Unincorporated Areas .................... 21 APPENDIX 2.............................................................................................................. 22 California Vehicle Code Section 312.5 as of December 23, 2023 ..................... 22 APPENDIX 3.............................................................................................................. 23 California Assembly Bills..................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 4.............................................................................................................. 24 County of Orange Ordinance No. 18-002............................................................ 24 E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 1

SUMMARY
The use of electric bicycles (E-bikes) has increased as our communities look to new and novel ways to commute and to reduce our reliance on automobiles. E-bikes are a cost-effective alternative. However, they bring higher risks of accidents and injuries when compared to conventional bicycles. The public deserves education and safety regulations to mitigate this concern.

The 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury (OCGJ) investigation into E-bike regulation, education, and safety focused on what, if any, pertinent regulations have been adopted by Orange County cities. The OCGJ investigation revealed that outside of the California Vehicle Code, the 34 cities, 13 of which are contract cities with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department (OCSD), vary significantly in their regulation, safety (accidents, fatalities, etc.), enforcement, and education on E-bikes. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) oversees E-bike safety, education, and public outreach for all unincorporated areas. OCTA holds quarterly meetings with all 34 cities in the county to discuss transportation issues including E-bike regulation, safety, education, and enforcement.

There is an urgent need to have consistent ordinances for the regulation and enforcement of safe E-bike use in all cities, school districts, parks, and unincorporated areas. Currently, there are significant differences in policy across cities. The recent surge in E-bike usage calls for immediate action to strengthen city oversight of this issue. This report will highlight the differences between cities’ approaches and make recommendations to attain realistic and practical policies for their respective jurisdictions.

BACKGROUND
The modern E-bike was introduced in the 1990s as a pedal assist bike with a batterypowered motor. The OCGJ focused on the 3 classes of E-bikes (see table below).

In most cases, it is hard to tell the difference between a Class 1, 2, or 3 E-bike, as there may be no apparent distinction to the naked eye. It is important that Orange County residents understand the different classes of E-bikes, how fast they can go, and any applicable restrictions or regulations that govern their use. This is particularly pertinent as automobile and bus commuters must now share the road with E-bike riders.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 2
The ease of use, relatively low price, and convenience of E-bikes have led to their proliferation throughout Orange County. It is estimated that the sales of E-bikes rose by 145% during 2020-to-2021 (World Economic Forum March 12, 2021).

However, along with the proliferation of E-bikes have come inevitable issues regarding their use, including:
• riding on sidewalks
• riding against traffic
• speeding
• bike vs pedestrian collisions
• bike vs motorized vehicle conflicts
• the ability to make unauthorized modifications to the electric motors which allows the E-bikes to exceed their maximum intended speed
There are also issues regarding E-bike rider injuries in accidents, which can be more serious than injuries of riders in bicycle accidents (US Consumer Product Safety Commission October 17, 2023). According to the OCGJ survey sent to city mayors, many do not track or have awareness of the incidence and prevalence of E-bike injuries and fatalities in their respective cities.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 3
The OCGJ sent a survey to all Orange County cities to learn each city’s policies, availability of safety education, and enforcement of E-bikes. The responses from the cities that answered indicate a wide variety of differences - with some cities having robust training, enforcement measures, and methods of socializing E-bike use in their communities.

The OCGJ recognizes that there cannot be a “one size fits all” approach to the regulation of E-bikes, as all cities in Orange County are unique and have different needs. For example, a large beachside city will have its own unique policies as compared to smaller inland cities. The rapidly expanding use of E-bikes compels cities to ensure a safe environment for riders of E-bikes and all citizens of Orange County.

REASON FOR THE STUDY
As E-bike sales have increased by almost 145% worldwide (World Economic Forum Mar. 12, 2021) over the past 2 years, the regulation of their use does not seem to have kept up. Accidents and incidents with E-bikes are on the rise, as are complaints from citizens of Orange County about E-bike riders (Voice of OC Sept. 2023). Accordingly, the OCGJ determined that an investigation into E-bikes was needed to bring public awareness to the safe use of E-bikes and the importance of having city-relevant “rules of the road” in place.

This report seeks to press Orange County cities to actively seek common-sense rules for E-bikes to ensure their safe operation among conventional bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles.

METHOD OF STUDY
Information from this investigation was collected and verified through multiple sources and statements made during interviews and includes extensive research of current online and print articles regarding E-bikes in Orange County. The OCGJ conducted the following activities:
• In-person interviews of representatives from:
o A major retail bike shop that sells both E-bikes and standard bicycles o The Orange County Transportation Authority
o The Orange County Sheriff’s Department
o The Central Newport Beach Community Association
• In-person attendance and online viewing of several city council meetings • In-person attendance at a training session hosted by a local city • Review of proposed State legislation that failed, passed, or is in committee E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 4
• Direct observance of E-bike riders, where they are riding, use of protective gear, passengers, dangerous maneuvers, etc.
• An online survey was distributed to the mayors of 34 cities in Orange County.

Unincorporated areas/divisions were not included in this survey. Mayors and/or representatives from 22 cities responded to this survey

INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS
Through interviews and surveys, the OCGJ determined that there is wide variation of rules on E-bikes and limited information regarding the reporting of E-bike incidents, accidents, injuries, and basic rules of the road for E-bikes.

Several news outlets (newspapers, magazines, television, online forums) have published stories about E-bikes. While many acknowledge the benefits of E-bikes, they also detail significant issues for cities to address.

Speeding, unsafe, or reckless operation, riders under 18 years of age not wearing helmets and toddlers riding on the back or front without proper child safety seats present common E-bike regulation and enforcement challenges for law enforcement.

Orange County Transportation Authority
OCTA has published on their website a comprehensive list of regulations listed by city regarding bicycles and E-bikes. As with the OCGJ survey, there are several different rules for E-bike riders dependent on what city they are riding in due to the differences in cities such as availability of bike lanes and the speed at which E-bikes are permitted to travel.

Orange County Sheriff’s Department
OCSD enforces the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 312.5 regarding electric bicycles. In addition, the Sheriff’s Department works closely with OCTA to provide E-bike outreach and education to the residents of Orange County. The OCSD Training Bulletin 23-01, issued January 4, 2023, provides the current E-bike enforcement criteria for Sheriff’s Deputies.

Cities Survey
OCGJ sent a list of survey questions to all city mayors in Orange County regarding policies in their cities with respect to E-bikes. Of the 34 surveys sent, 22 were completed and returned to the Grand Jury. A sampling of the survey results follows:

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 5
• Do you track injuries/deaths from E-bike accidents, injuries, fatalities? Tracking of E-bike injuries, deaths, property damage and battery fires, 11 of the 22 cities answered that they tracked these items on E-bikes.

The entity responsible for tracking these items varied within each city among law enforcement organizations, city government offices, and local hospitals. There is no standard way to compile and publish accident/incident information on E-bikes.

To properly track trends in E-bike operation, a robust incident and accident tracking mechanism must be in place. Items that need to be tracked include but are not limited to class of E-bike involved, estimated speed of the E-bike, direction of travel, age of the rider, whether helmets were used, and any injuries sustained. In the process of accident reporting, most police agencies do not distinguish whether the bicycle involved was a conventional bike or an E-bike.
• In your city, who, if anyone, is authorized to enforce infractions? Please select all that apply:

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 6
Of the 22 cities that completed the survey, 100% indicated that some form of law enforcement was the agency authorized to enforce/cite infractions for E-bike riders.

Police Departments, OCSD, or Park Rangers were the organizations authorized for E-bike enforcement.
• In your city, are E-bikes allowed:
10 cities indicated that E-bikes were authorized on sidewalks, 4 cities answered unknown, and the remaining cities answered that E-bikes were prohibited from sidewalks.
21 cities indicated that E-bikes were authorized in bike lanes with one city responding as unknown.
13 cities indicated that E-bikes are allowed on park trails, 5 cities indicated that E-bikes were prohibited from using park trails, and 4 cities indicated that park trail policy for E-bikes was unknown.
16 cities indicated that E-bikes were authorized in vehicle lanes and 6 cities answered unknown.
5 cities answered no, 8 cities answered unknown, and 9 cities indicated that E-bikes were allowed on highways.

Riding on sidewalks was found to be a contentious issue. One city cited California Assembly Bill 825 (which would have barred local agencies from prohibiting bike use on sidewalks but has since been vetoed) as a reason not to prohibit E-bikes on sidewalks.

When there is no defined bike lane, E-bike riders will ride on sidewalks as a matter of safety. E-bikes, depending on the class, can go up to 28 miles per hour, which is typically faster than a conventional bicycle and much faster than a walking pedestrian.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 7
Although most current laws give the bicyclist and pedestrians the right of way, the reaction time for an E-bike rider going over 10 miles per hour on the sidewalk generally does not give the rider adequate opportunity to avoid pedestrians walking on the sidewalk or cars coming out of driveways.
• Does your city have posted speed limits for E-bikes?
100% of the cities that answered the OCGJ survey indicated that they do not post speed limits for E-bikes. No reasons were cited as to why they are not posted for E-bikes even though their top speed can be as high as 28 miles per hour or faster if the rider disables speed restrictive devices thus allowing the E-bike to almost double its speed.

There are obvious issues involving where to place speed limit signs for E-bikes. They are allowed to travel in bike lanes, on sidewalks, and in some jurisdictions even allowed to ride in opposition to traffic.
• In your city, are E-bikes expected to travel in the same direction or opposite direction from street traffic?
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 8
Some cities have authorized E-bikes to ride against the flow of traffic. As stated in the OCTA website (in a section entitled “Wrong Way Riding”), riding against traffic is inherently dangerous due to:
➢ Oncoming cars approach at a much higher speed
➢ Drivers cannot see E-bike riders when turning left
➢ E-bike rider is unable to make right turns
➢ Traffic signals cannot be seen
• Is safety training offered by the city for E-bike riders? Safety education and/or training for E-bike riders is available only sporadically and is, in most cases, optional. As noted in the survey, only 8 cities indicated that safety training was offered. The Orange County Register published a story (OC Register Jan 3, 2024) about a San Juan Capistrano resident who has taken on educating new E-bike riders as a result of her son being injured on an E-bike. An OCGJ visit to a local retailer of E-bikes found there was no formal training for E-bike purchasers or riders, and the only information to purchasers of E-bikes was a pamphlet. The Huntington Beach Police Department has a safety class every other month which focuses on E-bike safety.

OCTA holds safety “bike rodeos” for E-bike riders. These are a few examples of the education available for E-bike riders, but none is mandatory prior to purchasing or riding an E-bike. Therefore, grass-roots efforts are another important step in promoting education and safety.

The OCGJ interviewed a member of the Central Newport Beach Community Association as to their concerns about education, safety, and enforcement regarding E-bikes. The Association has been active in monitoring E-bike use, specifically on the Balboa peninsula. Its focus has been on a perceived lack of enforcement of existing ordinances and the CVC on streets and the beach boardwalk. Along with education and safety training, the Association prefers active enforcement using radar guns, tickets, and increased law enforcement presence.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 9
• Do the schools/school districts in your city offer safety information and/or certification for student E-bike users on campus?
There are 28 school districts spread across the 34 cities of Orange County. Cities were asked whether schools in their jurisdictions offer safety information to student E-bike riders. Of the 22 cities that responded to the survey, 7 answered yes and 2 answered no. The concerning number that leaps to the eye is that 13 survey respondents stated that they were unaware of their school district’s participation in E-bike regulation. At the time of this report, the 5 districts (per district website) that currently require safety training and registration are:
➢ Capistrano Unified
➢ Los Alamitos Unified
➢ Huntington Beach Union
➢ Irvine Unified
➢ Ocean View
• Are there any other persons/groups that might be able to provide meaningful or relevant information regarding E-bikes to the Grand Jury? At least 6 cities referred this question to the OCSD. 6 others referred this question to their own police department. Interestingly, at least 6 suggested that their jurisdictional park rangers (if these are in place in their city) would be able to answer the question.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 10
• Is there outreach by the city being conducted to inform your community of any regulations and safety training?
Of the 34 cities in Orange County, 22 responded to this question: 10 cities said “yes,” 10 cities said “no,” and 2 cities indicated “unknown.”
An example of outreach is the City of Irvine’s Police Department. The outreach has several elements which includes High Visibility Enforcement (HVE) operations to issue administrative citations to juveniles violating vehicle codes on E-bikes. It also hosts E-bike safety courses, E-bike rodeos, and community presentations on E-bike safety.

There are also plans for Public Safety in collaboration with the Irvine Unified School District to implement a parking permit program which will require students riding E-bikes to school to attend workshops on E-bike safety before being issued a parking permit to park their E-bike on campus.
• Does your city regulate the use of E-bikes?
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 11
There were 15 cities who responded that they do not regulate E-bikes or their usage.

The OCGJ felt that this statistic, on its own, warranted further investigation and, possibly, further action by such cities.

GENERAL COMMENTS FROM SURVEY RESPONDENTS
“I personally promote safe e-bike texts on local Facebook groups... about 16,000 members. I promote e-bike safety every council meeting.” “State and local legislation is lagging far behind e-bike technology and there is a lot of confusion amongst e-bike users and police regarding what is lawful and what is unlawful when it comes to e-bikes.”
“Thank you for looking into this. I am a relatively new mayor and although I consider eBikes an issue, we have so many other issues that are taking priority. I would like to see e-Bikes banned from all trails that were previously used for bicycles and pedestrians only. They function more like scooters than bicycles.”
“E-bikes and bike safety, in general, are very big topics in the community right now and our Police Department is currently doing A LOT to address these items. Besides conducting weekly High Visibility Enforcement (HVE) operations, IPD’s traffic staff oftentimes issue administrative citations to juveniles who commit vehicle code violations on their bicycles, including E-bikes and E-scooters. In fact, approximately 50% of our administrative citations are issued to E-bike and E-scooter operators. Rather than paying a fine similar to conventional traffic citations, our administrative citations require the juvenile to attend a 2-hour long bike safety course with a parent or guardian on the weekend at City Hall.”
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 12
“Our city will soon be meeting with reps from OCSD in reference to providing additional educational tools for e-bike riders. I have made contact with our local elected officials in reference to securing funds for e-bike enforcement and education.” “The issue with E-bike safety is an active project in our traffic safety unit. Currently we are looking at any municipal codes which will assist with safety for e-bike riders and motorists.”

COMMENDATIONS
The following agencies contributed to the OCGJ’s investigation into the use of E-bikes in Orange County:
• Orange County Transportation Authority has taken a leadership role in outreach and education to all 34 Orange County cities
• Orange County Sheriff’s Department has been very proactive in keeping up with the everchanging rules of the road for E-bikes
• Central Newport Beach Community Association provided important data and various studies on E-bike usage in Newport Beach

FINDINGS
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2023-2024 Grand Jury requires (or, as noted requests) responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. Based on its investigation titled “E-bikes- Friend or Foe,” the 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury has arrived at three principal findings, as follows:

F1. The majority of Orange County’s 34 cities do not have ordinances or policies in place, which makes it difficult to address the safe operation and regulation of E-bikes leading to confusion.

F2. Due to the increasing incidence of E-bike injuries and deaths, there is a need for consistent and accurate tracking by law enforcement and first responders, which does not exist now.

F3. Training and education on E-bike use and safety varies from city to city causing confusion amongst bike riders.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 13

Based on its investigation described herein, the 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury makes the following recommendations:

R1. Each Orange County city should have specific policies that define the rules of the road for use of E-bikes in their communities by December 1, 2024.

R2. Each Orange County city should have a mechanism in place to report accidents, injuries and deaths involving E-bikes by December 1, 2024.

R3. Each Orange County city should research and develop outreach and education programs regarding the safe operation of E-bikes for their residents by December 1, 2024.

RESPONSES
California Penal Code Section 933 requires the governing body of any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court). Additionally, in the case of a report containing findings and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected County official shall comment on the findings and recommendations pertaining to the matters under that elected official’s control within 60 days to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors.

Furthermore, California Penal Code Section 933.05 specifies the manner in which such comment(s) are to be made as follows:
(a) As to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following:
(1) The respondent agrees with the finding.
(2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefore.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 14
(b) As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions:
(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.
(2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand Jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation, therefore.
(c) If a finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision-making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department.

REQUIRED RESPONSES
Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with Penal Code Section 933.05 are required from:

Findings – 90 Day Response Required
City Councils of:

Aliso Viejo F1, F2, F3
Anaheim F1, F2, F3
Brea F1, F2, F3
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 15
Buena Park F1, F2, F3
Costa Mesa F1, F2, F3
Cypress F1, F2, F3
Dana Point F1, F2, F3
Fountain Valley F1, F2, F3
Fullerton F1, F2, F3
Garden Grove F1, F2, F3
Huntington Beach F1, F2, F3
Irvine F1, F2, F3
La Habra F1, F2, F3
La Palma F1, F2, F3
Laguna Beach F1, F2, F3
Laguna Hills F1, F2, F3
Laguna Niguel F1, F2, F3
Laguna Woods F1, F2, F3
Lake Forest F1, F2, F3
Los Alamitos F1, F2, F3
Mission Viejo F1, F2, F3
Newport Beach F1, F2, F3
Orange F1, F2, F3
Placentia F1, F2, F3
Rancho Santa Margarita F1, F2, F3
San Clemente F1, F2, F3
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 16
San Juan Capistrano F1, F2, F3
Santa Ana F1, F2, F3
Seal Beach F1, F2, F3
Stanton F1, F2, F3
Tustin F1, F2, F3
Villa Park F1, F2, F3
Westminster F1, F2, F3
Yorba Linda F1, F2, F3
Recommendations – 90 Day Response Required
City Councils of:

Aliso Viejo R1, R2, R3
Anaheim R1, R2, R3
Brea R1, R2, R3
Buena Park R1, R2, R3
Costa Mesa R1, R2, R3
Cypress R1, R2, R3
Dana Point R1, R2, R3
Fountain Valley R1, R2, R3
Fullerton R1, R2, R3
Garden Grove R1, R2, R3
Huntington Beach R1, R2, R3
Irvine R1, R2, R3
La Habra R1, R2, R3
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 17
La Palma R1, R2, R3
Laguna Beach R1, R2, R3
Laguna Hills R1, R2, R3
Laguna Niguel R1, R2, R3
Laguna Woods R1, R2, R3
Lake Forest R1, R2, R3
Los Alamitos R1, R2, R3
Mission Viejo R1, R2, R3
Newport Beach R1, R2, R3
Orange R1, R2, R3
Placentia R1, R2, R3
Rancho Santa Margarita R1, R2, R3
San Clemente R1, R2, R3
San Juan Capistrano R1, R2, R3
Santa Ana R1, R2, R3
Seal Beach R1, R2, R3
Stanton R1, R2, R3
Tustin R1, R2, R3
Villa Park R1, R2, R3
Westminster R1, R2, R3
Yorba Linda R1, R2, R3
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 18

REFERENCES
2 On Your Side: “Orange County Sees Spike in E-bike Accidents” KCAL NEWS, Nov 3, 2021
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=ebike+injurys+in+orange+county+CA&docid=60 3525694912734209&mid=D1537F514A8F881DE2A9D1537F514A8F881DE2A9&view= detail&FORM=VIRE
Biesiada, Noah , “Orange County Cities Struggle to Handle Electronic Bike Regulations” Voice of OC , Dec 20, 2022 https://voiceofoc.org/2022/12/orange-county-cities-struggleto-handle-electric-bike-regulations/ Biesiada, Noah, “Orange County Cities Crack Down on E-bikes with Stricter Regulations” Voice of OC, Sep 28, 2023 https//Orange County Cities Crack Down on EBikes With Stricter Regulations (voiceofoc.org) Connelly, Laylan, “E-bike Lady educates new riders before hitting streets on electric bikes” Orange County Register, Jan 3, 2024, https//E-bike lady’ educates new riders before hitting streets on electric bikes – Orange County Register (ocregister.com) DMV Motorcycle Handbook, Two Wheel Vehicle Operation, Electric Bicycles https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/motorcycle-handbook/two-wheel-vehicleoperation/ “E-Scooter and E-bike-Injuries Soar-2022 Injuries Increased nearly 21%” Consumer Product Safety Commission, Oct 17, 2023
E-Scooter and E-Bike Injuries Soar: 2022 Injuries Increased Nearly 21% | CPSC.gov Fleming, Shawn “Electric Bike Sales grew by 145% in the US Last Year” World Economic Forum, Mar 12, 2021
Sales of electric bicycles are up all over the world | World Economic Forum (weforum.org)
Fry, Hannah, “On Orange County Beaches, proliferation of e-bikes brings battle to the boardwalk” Los Angeles Times, Jan 16, 2023
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-01-16/mayhem-on-the-boardwalk-orangecounty-cities-tackle-e-bikes-with-varying-results Irvine Watchdog, ”Irvine Transportation Commission to propose E-bike safety ordinance” May 14,2023 https://irvinewatchdog.org/city-hall/transportationcommission/irvine-transportation-commission-to-propose-e-bike-safety-ordinance/ Kelly, Charles M., “Council approves introduction of e-bike ordinance City of Seal Beach” Sun News, May 10, 2023, https://www.sunnews.org/council-approvesintroduction-of-e-bike-ordinance/ E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 19
OC Bike, E-Bikes
https://octa.net/getting-around/active/oc-bike/e-bikes/ Orange County Public Works, E-Bike Safety in the County of Orange https://ocip.ocpublicworks.com/e-bike
Orange County Sheriff’s Department, E-bike Safety The focus for National Bike Safety Month https://www.ocsheriff.gov/news/e-bike-safety-focus-national-bike-safety-month Orange County Sheriff’s Office Training Bulletin, Jan 4, 2023 https://www.ocsheriff.gov/sites/ocsd/files/2023-01/Bulletin%2023- 01%20Enforcement%20and%20Handling%20of%20Electric%20Bicycles%2C%20Motor cycles%20and%20Motorized%20Scooters_Redacted.pdf
Pimental, Joseph, “In Los Alamitos students will need a permit to ride e-bikes to and from school”, Spectrum News Jan 23,2023 https://spectrumnews1.com/ca/lawest/public-safety/2023/01/20/in-los-alamitos—students-will-need-a-permit-to-ride-ebikes-to—from-school E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 20

GLOSSARY
CNBCA Central Newport Beach Community Association
CVC California Vehicle Code
E-bike Electric bicycle
HVE High Visibility Enforcement
OCGJ Orange County Grand Jury
OCSD Orange County Sheriff’s Department
OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority
E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 21

APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
Current County of Orange E-Bike Laws - Unincorporated Areas 1 • All E-bikes are required to have a label that describes classification, top assisted speed, and motor wattage.
• Helmets are recommended for all E-bike users. If you are under 18, it’s required! • It is illegal to carry passengers on your E-bike unless your bike has an extra permanent seat or when using a child safety seat.
• E-bikes shall not be operated in excess of their designed speed or the speed limit, whichever is lower, on the road, and in no event in excess of 10 miles per hour on paved trails.
• E-bike shall not be operated in excess of 5 miles per hour on sidewalk. • Riding on the road against the flow of traffic is prohibited. 1 Orange County Public Works. 2024. "E-bike Safety in the County of Orange." Accessed May

22. 2024. https://www.ocgov.com .

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 22
APPENDIX 2
California Vehicle Code Section 312.5 as of December 23, 2023 An electric bicycle is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts. Three classes of electric bicycles have been established:
• Class 1: A low speed pedal-assisted electric bicycle equipped with a motor which provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and ceases to provide assistance when a speed of 20 mph is reached.
• Class 2: A low speed throttle-assisted electric bicycle equipped with a motor used exclusively to propel the bicycle and NOT capable of providing assistance when a speed of 20 mph is reached.
• Class 3: A low speed pedal-assisted electric bicycle equipped with a speedometer, and a motor which provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and ceases to provide assistance when a speed of 28 mph is reached.

The operator of a Class 3 electric bicycle:
• Must be 16 years old or older.
• Must wear a bicycle safety helmet.
• Must not transport passengers.
• May ride an electric bicycle in a bicycle lane if authorized by local authority or ordinance.

All electric bicycle classes are exempt from the motor vehicle financial responsibility, driver’s license, and license plate requirements (CVC § 24016).

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 23
APPENDIX 3
California Assembly Bills
Listed below are some of the bills introduced into the State legislature, as published by LegiScan, that have a variety of proposed regulations regarding E-bikes. This is by no means a comprehensive list, and in the interest of brevity we do not include the text of each bill.

AB 458 10/08/2023 Chaptered-Regulation of insurance requirements for businesses renting micro mobility vehicles, a category which includes E-bikes.

AB 1773 04/01/2024 In committee-Where E-bikes are permitted to operate.

AB 1774 04/09/2024. This bill would prohibit a person from selling a product or device that can modify the speed capability of an electric bicycle such that it no longer meets the definition of an electric bicycle.

AB 2234 04/01/2024 In committee: The bill will require anyone over the age of 12 without a valid driver’s license to take an online e-bike safety training course and pass a written test to prove they understand traffic safety rules. Those without a valid driver’s license must have a state-issued ID to operate an E-bike.

SB 295 06/16/2023 In committee. Allows Public Agency authority to regulate E-bikes, et. al. on public property.

SB 381 10/13/2023 Chaptered-Comprehensive study of E-bikes.

SB 1271 04/11/2024. This bill would clarify that an electric bicycle is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor with continuous rated mechanical power of not more than 750 watts. The bill would, if an electric bicycle is capable of operating in multiple modes, require a manufacturer and distributor to include on the label the classification number of the highest classes of which it is capable of operating. Also requires lab accreditation of micro mobility batteries.

E-bikes Friend or Foe
2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury Page 24
APPENDIX 4
County of Orange Ordinance No. 18-002

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 2-5-29(n) OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, REGARDING PROHIBITED MOTORIZED WHEELED CONVEYANCES.

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange ordains as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 2-5-29(n) of the Codified Ordinances of the County of Orange is hereby amended to read as follows:

Sec. 2-5-29.- Vehicle regulation.
(n) Motorized Wheeled Conveyance prohibited. No person shall operate or drive any electric or combustible motorized skateboard, scooter, dirt bike, mini bike, mini motor bike, mini motorcycle, go-kart, go-ped, all-terrain vehicle, quad runner, dune buggy or any similar electric or combustible motorized conveyance in any park, beach or recreational area, with the exception of Class 1 and Class 2 electric bicycles, as defined by the California Vehicle Code, on those regional paved, off-road bikeways designated for such use by the Director of OC Parks, with the approval of the Board of Supervisors.

David J. Shawver
Mayor
Carol Warren
Mayor Pro Tem
Carol Warren
Council Member
Gary Taylor
Council Member
Donald Torres
Council Member
Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Phone (714) 379-9222
Fax (714) 890-1443
www.stanton.ca.gov
August 27, 2024
Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
700 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Honorable Judge Maria Hernandez:

The City of Stanton received the 2023-2024 Orange County Grand Jury report entitled “E-bikes Friend or Foe”. As required by California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the City of Stanton is responding to the findings and recommendations included in the report.

Findings
F1 The majority of Orange County’s 34 cities do not have ordinances or policies in place, which makes it difficult to address the safe operation and regulation of E-bikes leading to confusion.

F2 Due to the increasing incidence of E-bike injuries and deaths, there is a need for consistent and accurate tracking by law enforcement and first responders, which does not exist now.

Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.

F3 Training and education on E-bike use and safety varies from city to city causing confusion amongst bike riders.

The respondent agrees with the finding.

Recommendations
R1 Each Orange County city should have specific policies that define the rules of the road for use of E-bikes in their communities by December 1, 2024.

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.

R2 Each Orange County city should have a mechanism in place to report accidents, injuries and deaths involving E-bikes by December 1, 2024.

Rather than initially creating a stand-alone solution, the City will assess what other Orange County cities utilize to report the requested data.

R3 Each Orange County city should research and develop outreach and education programs regarding the safe operation of E-bikes for their residents by December 1, 2024.

The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.

The City will research and develop outreach and education programs in partnership with the OCSD by December 1, 2024.

Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager, at (714) 890-4277 or via email at [email protected].

Respectfully,
David J. Shawver
Mayor
Cc: Orange County Grand Jury
700 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: August 27, 2024
SUBJECT: AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO SCA OF CA,

LLC FOR CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
REPORT IN BRIEF:

As the current contract for citywide street sweeping services is set to expire on September 30, 2024, City staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) in April 2024. Staff recommend awarding a three-year contract to SCA of CA, LLC in an amount not-to-exceed $627,177 or $199,059 annually. As part of the funding for these services, staff is requesting an appropriation to the City’s Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Operating Budget of $35,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211).

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

1. City Council declare this project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 1, Section 15301(h) as maintenance of existing landscaping; and

3. Appropriate $35,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211) to Account 211-3500-608100.

BACKGROUND:

Street sweeping is routine work that keeps public streets and facilities in a safe and usable condition for the public. The City is responsible for maintaining approximately 142 roadway curb miles, 3 median curb miles, and 5 alley centerline miles. The City’s current contract for street sweeping services expires on September 30, 2024. The contract services include promptly responding to large roadway spills, including, but not limited to sand, gravel, glass, litter and small rocks caused by an accident or other circumstances.

In addition, street sweeping is an important element of the City’s NPDES program, helping remove trash and metals from entering the storm drain system.

Item: 9J
Click here to return to the agenda.
2 ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

On April 25, 2024, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for citywide street sweeping services with a proposal due date of May 29, 2024.

The City received three proposals in response to the City’s RFP. An internal review committee consisting of the Public Works Director, Code Enforcement/Parking Control Manager, and Public Works Manager evaluated the proposals. The review committee established their scoring and ranking on criteria that included approach to work, cost, demonstrating record of success and qualifications. After reviewing and ranking the three proposals, the review committee invited all three firms to interview. The contractors were ranked as follows:

Rank Contractor Amount
1 SCA of CA, LLC $ 199,059.00
2 Nationwide Environmental Services $ 491,880.00
3 Guardian Street Sweeping $ 337,364.56
Per the City’s Purchasing and Contracting Guidelines, proposals must be evaluated using the Qualification-Based Selection process in accordance with Public Law 92-582, which requires that the selection of professional services be based on demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services at a fair and reasonable price.

Based on the results of the RFP process, SCA of CA, LLC demonstrates competence through their proposal and is qualified to provide professional street sweeping services.

SCA of CA, LLC has successfully provided similar services to other cities. References were checked with the Cities of Costa Mesa, Manhattan Beach, and Mission Viejo. Staff negotiated the total cost with SCA of CA, LLC and reduced it by over 8% with the caveat SCA is allowed to annually submit a CPI request. Ultimately, the City would decide if the CPI request were approved or denied. Following is a summary of the locations and sweeping frequency of the new contract:
• Public Right-of-Way Location Frequency

1. All Streets in Stanton 1x a Week

2. Cedar Street (South of Katella) 2x a Week

3. Village Center Dr 2x a Week
• Medians Location Frequency

1. Katella Avenue 1x a Week

2. Chapman Avenue 1x a Week

3. Cerritos Avenue 1x a Week
• Beach Boulevard Location Frequency

1. N. City Limit to S. City Limit 2x a Week

2. Medians 1x a Week
3 • Parks Location Frequency

1. Stanton Park Parking Lot 2x a Week

2. Stanton Central Park Parking Lot 1x a Week
• Alleys Location Frequency

1. All Alleys in Stanton 1x a Month
Staff recommends entering a three (3) year professional services agreement with two (2) optional one-year extensions with SCA of CA, LLC in an amount not-to-exceed $627,177 or $199,059 annually. Due to unplanned extraordinary maintenance, a healthy contingency has been included in this contract. However, this does not mean all the contingency will be used if it is not needed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Operating Budget includes insufficient funds for street sweeping services based on the submitted proposals and the negotiated cost. Therefore, staff recommends an appropriation of $35,000 from the Gas Tax Fund (#211). The City’s Gas Tax Fund has sufficient funds available to support this appropriation. Per the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Adopted Budget, the available fund balance in the Fund is $1.8 million.

This amount is expected to increase after the City’s books are closed for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, as actual expenditures are expected to be less than the budgeted amount.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

The action requested in this report is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Class 1, Section 15301(h) as maintenance of existing landscaping.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE ADDRESSED:

Obj. No. 3: Provide a quality infrastructure.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Notifications were performed through the normal agenda process. 4 Prepared by: Cesar Rangel P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
ATTACHMENT:

A. Professional Services Agreement

CITY OF STANTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 20___, by and between the City of Stanton, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680 (“City”) and SCA OF CA, LLC, a LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, with its principal place of business at 16251 CONSTRUCTION CIRCLE W, IRVINE, CA 92606 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional citywide street sweeping services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional citywide street sweeping services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the project.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional street sweeping services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from September 1, 2024 to September 30, 2027, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City Manager shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement annually for no more than two additional one-year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. Consultant shall Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.
complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractors, Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision.

Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant shall complete, execute, and submit to City a Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification (IRS FormW-9) prior to commencement of any Services under this Agreement. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City.

The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Terry Roberts, District Sales Manager.

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates Public Works Director, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder.

Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Terry Roberts, District Sales Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement.

The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement.

As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules, and regulations, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules, or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance.

3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.10.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement, the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the Insurance Requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement, or endorse the policies to do so.
(a) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office “occurrence” form CG 0001, with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and if written with an aggregate, the aggregate shall be double the per occurrence limit.

Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement.
(b) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering “Any Auto” (Symbol 1) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 each accident.
(c) Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.

3.2.10.3 Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval.
(a) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (a) Commercial General Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional
insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to “ongoing operations”; (2) exclude “contractual liability”; (3) restrict coverage to “sole” liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the Agreement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(b) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (b) Automobile Liability and (d) Professional Liability shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(c) The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 3.2.10.2 (e) Workers’ Compensation shall be endorsed to provide the following:
(1) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the indemnified parties.
(2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.

3.2.10.4 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All insurance coverages shall be primary, and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the indemnified parties shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.5 Waiver of Subrogation. Required insurance coverages shall not prohibit Consultant from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant shall waive all subrogation rights against the indemnified parties. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.6 Deductible. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the indemnified parties in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.

3.2.10.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates and endorsements on forms approved by the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

3.2.10.8 Failure to Maintain Coverage. Consultant agrees to suspend and cease all operations hereunder during such period of time as the required insurance coverage is not in effect and evidence of insurance has not been furnished to the City. The City shall have the right to withhold any payment due Consultant until Consultant has fully complied with the insurance provisions of this Agreement.

In the event that the Consultant’s operations are suspended for failure to maintain required insurance coverage, the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for completion of the Services because of production lost during suspension.

3.2.10.9 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to do business in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

3.2.10.10 Insurance for Subconsultants. All Subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant’s policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing Subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the Subconsultant’s policies.

3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions, as applicable, shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed SIX HUNDRED TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND ONE-HUNDRED SEVENTEEN DOLLARS ($627,117.00) (“Total Compensation”) for the entire term of the contract, and shall not exceed ONE HUNDED NINETY-NINE THOUSAND FIFTY-NINE DOLLARS ($199,059.00) annually without written approval of City’s City Manager. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation.

Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant:

SCA of CA, LLC
16251 Construction Circle W
Irvine, CA 92606
Attn: Terry Roberts, District Sales Manager
City:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Attn: Cesar Rangel, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including, but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data.

Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.

3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production, or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.5.3.3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information (“Proprietary Information”) unless the City’s legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant’s objection to the City’s release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost, or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City’s choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate, or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.5.5 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative, or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.6 Indemnification.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify, and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage, or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project, or this Agreement, including, without limitation, the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney fees, and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

The obligation to indemnify, as provided herein, shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County, California.

3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.8 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates, or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation, or transfer.

3.9 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days, or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.11 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.12 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.13 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.14 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay, any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.15 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.16 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.17 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.19 Declaration of Political Contributions. Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, submit to City an annual statement in writing declaring any political contributions of money, in-kind services, or loan made to any member of the City Council within the previous twelve-month period by the Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees, including any employee(s) that Consultant intends to assign to perform the Services described in this Agreement.

3.20 Subcontracting.

3.20.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[Signatures on following page.]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Professional Services Agreement on this ____ day of __________, 202_.

CITY OF STANTON SCA OF CA, LLC
By:

Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
By: _________________________________
Name: Brad Becker
Title: Regional Vice President
ATTEST:

By:

Patricia Vazquez
City Clerk
By:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
55414.00000\32996936.2
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Page 1 of 35 ends

Stanton City CouncilAugust 27, 2024

Stanton City Council
August 27, 2024