EXHIBIT 1 1690
REV 2022-05-17
Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City of Stockton is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.
Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Certificate Holder Address
The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:
City of Stockton
Its Officers, Officials, Employees, and Volunteers
400 E Main Street, 3rd Floor – HR
Stockton, CA 95202
EXHIBIT C
EXHIBIT 1 1691
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Stockton Channel Street Project 461 days Fri 8/11/23 Fri 5/16/25 2 City Issues NTP 0 days Fri 8/11/23 Fri 8/11/23
3 Background Research 10 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 8/24/23
4 Obtain Historical Documents and Review 10 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 8/24/23 2 5 Research Boundary 2 days Fri 8/11/23 Mon 8/14/23 2
6 Prepare Utility A Letters 3 days Fri 8/11/23 Tue 8/15/23 2 7 Perform Topographic and Boundary Surveys 10 days Fri 8/11/23 Thu 8/24/23 2 8 Construction Documents and Estimates 155 days Fri 8/25/23 Thu 3/28/24 9 Geometric and Constraints Memo & Estimate 15 days Fri 8/25/23 Thu 9/14/23 7 10 City Review and Final Scope Selection 10 days Fri 9/15/23 Thu 9/28/23 9 11 65% Submittal 45 days Fri 9/29/23 Thu 11/30/23
12 Prepare for 65% Submittal 25 days Fri 9/29/23 Thu 11/2/23 10 13 Agency Plan Check 20 days Fri 11/3/23 Thu 11/30/23 12 14 95% Submittal 45 days Fri 12/1/23 Thu 2/1/24
15 Prepare for 95% Submittal 25 days Fri 12/1/23 Thu 1/4/24 13 16 Agency Plan Check 20 days Fri 1/5/24 Thu 2/1/24 15
17 100% and Final Submittals 40 days Fri 2/2/24 Thu 3/28/24 18 Prepare for 100% Submittal 20 days Fri 2/2/24 Thu 2/29/24 16 19 Agency Final Review and Approval 20 days Fri 3/1/24 Thu 3/28/24 18 20 Advertise and Contract Award 116 days Fri 3/29/24 Fri 9/6/24 21 Final Plan Approvals & Bid Package Prep 5 days Fri 3/29/24 Thu 4/4/24 19 22 Advertise Project to Bidders 25 days Fri 4/5/24 Thu 5/9/24 21 23 Bid Opening 0 days Thu 5/9/24 Thu 5/9/24 22
24 Final Staff Report 15 days Fri 5/10/24 Thu 5/30/24 23 25 City Council Authorization 41 days Fri 5/31/24 Fri 7/26/24 24 26 Biology Pre-Construction Survey 5 days Mon 7/29/24 Fri 8/2/24 25 27 Award Contract 25 days Mon 7/29/24 Fri 8/30/24 25
28 Issue Notice to Proceed 5 days Mon 9/2/24 Fri 9/6/24 27 29 Construction 180 days Mon 9/9/24 Fri 5/16/25 28
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 2024 2025
Task
Critical Task
Milestone
Summary
Rolled Up Task
Rolled Up Critical Task
Rolled Up Milestone
Rolled Up Progress
Split
External Tasks
Project Summary
Group By Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Progress
Deadline
Manual Progress
PROJECT SCHEDULE
CITY OF STOCKTON CHANNEL STREET IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
Wed 4/12/23
Project: Channel Street
Date: Wed 4/12/23
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT 1 1692
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 1 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY 7/27/09 5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to reaffirm the City's commitment to demonstrating respect for all individuals by strictly prohibiting discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment in the workplace. This policy defines prohibited behavior and conduct, and sets forth a procedure for reporting, investigating and resolving complaints of discrimination, harassment, in the workplace, including retaliation and hostile work environment.
II. POLICY
A. The City of Stockton prohibits any form of discrimination and/or harassment of any person based on race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, military and veterans status, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic characteristics or information, denial of family and medical care leave, marital status, sexual orientation, sex (including gender, gender identity, gender expression, transgender, pregnancy, childbirth and breastfeeding), political affiliation, age (40 and older), concerted labor activity, or any other category or attribute consistent with state or federal law.
All such discrimination and harassment is unlawful and shall not be tolerated. In addition, under the federal Affordable Care Act (ACA), the City of Stockton prohibits discrimination and/or harassment, or retaliation against an employee who obtains coverage, receives a tax credit or subsidy through the Health Care "Market Place" or "Exchange."
B. It is an unlawful employment practice to discriminate against or to harass an unpaid intern or volunteer on the basis of any legally protected classification unless an exception applies, such as a bona fide occupational qualification.
C. The City will neither tolerate nor condone discrimination and/or harassment of employees by managers, supervisors, co-workers, or non-employees with whom City employees have a business service, or professional relationship.
D. All City employees and non-employees share a responsibility to assist in
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1693
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 2 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY 7/27/09 5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 maintaining an employment environment free of discrimination and harassment. This policy applies to all aspects of City employment, including, but not limited to, hiring, reassignment, placement, promotion, employment action, disciplinary action, layoff, reemployment, transfer, leave of absence, compensation and benefits, training; or other terms of treatment of that person in an unpaid internship, or another limited duration program to provide unpaid work experience for that person, or the harassment of an unpaid intern or volunteer.
E. All allegations of discrimination and/or harassment shall be investigated immediately by the City, in accordance with this policy. If it is determined that any prohibited activity has occurred, remedial action shall be taken. Such action may include discipline up to and including discharge. In addition, under applicable law, individual supervisors and employees may be subject to personal liability and/or punitive damages in any litigation arising as a result of such conduct.
F. All new hires shall attend harassment awareness training, and supervisors and managers shall attend harassment awareness and prevention training for supervisors every two years.
G. The City of Stockton prohibits retaliation against any employee or nonemployee by another employee, non-employee, supervisor, or manager for reporting, filing, testifying, assisting or participating in any manner in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing conducted by the employer or a federal or state enforcement agency.
H. This policy applies to all officials, employees, volunteers, unpaid interns, agents, or contractors of the City.
I. This policy shall be administered by the Director of Human Resources.
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1694
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 3 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY 7/27/09 5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment m the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 Ill. DEFINITION AND EXAMPLES OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT A. "Discrimination," as used in this policy, is any action, behavior, practice, or process that is intended to deny, or results in the denial of, employment rights, privileges, or benefits because of a person's race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, military and veterans status, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic characteristics or information, denial of family and medical care leave, marital status, sexual orientation, sex (including gender, gender identity, gender expression, transgender, pregnancy, childbirth and breastfeeding), political affiliation, age (40 and older), concerted labor activity, or any other prohibition identified under state and federal law. The following are examples of conduct that may constitute discrimination:
1. Soliciting applications from a source where all or most of potential workers are of the same race or color.
2. Considering a person's gender as the basis for differences in pay, work assignments, performance evaluations, training, discipline, or any other area of employment; and
3. Questioning a job applicant about the existence, nature and severity of a disability.
B. "Harassment," as used in this policy, consists of any conduct affecting another person because of his or her race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, military and veterans status, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic characteristics or information, denial of family and medical care leave, marital status, sexual orientation, sex (including gender, gender identity, gender expression, transgender, pregnancy, childbirth and breastfeeding), political affiliation, age (40 and older), concerted labor activity, or any other category or attribute identified under state and federal law when such conduct has the purpose or the effect of: (1) creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment; (2) unreasonably interfering with the employee's or non-employee's work performance; or (3)
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1695
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 4 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT POLICY Effective Date: Revised From:
7/27/09
5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 otherwise adversely affecting an employee's or non-employee's employment opportunities.
Harassment may take many forms, including, but not limited to, the following examples:
1. Verbal Harassment: Epithets, derogatory and offensive comments or slurs based on race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, marital status, pregnancy, medical condition, gender, sexual orientation, political affiliation, age, or any other category or attribute identified under state and federal law.
2. Physical Harassment: Assault, impeding or blocking movement that results in the physical interference with normal work or movement on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, marital status, pregnancy, medical condition, gender, sexual orientation, political affiliation, age, or any other category or attribute identified under state and federal law.
3. Visual Harassment: The displaying of posters, photography, notices, bulletins, e-mails, cartoons or drawings with derogatory and offensive content based on race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, marital status, pregnancy, medical condition, gender, sexual orientation, political affiliation, age, or any other category or attribute identified under state and federal law.
C. "Sexual harassment," as used in this policy, is a subcategory of harassment, and is specifically defined by law as unwanted sexual advances, requests for sexual favors or visual, verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when:
1. Submission to such conduct is made a term or condition of employment; or
2. Submission to or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for employment decisions affecting the individual; or
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1696
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 5 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT POLICY Effective Date: Revised From:
7/27/09
5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93
3. Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an employee's or non-employee's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment because of the persistent, severe or pervasive nature of the conduct.
Examples of Sexual Harassment include, but are not limited to the following:
a. Unwelcome sexual overtures or propositions.
b. Offering employment benefits or status in exchange for sexual favors.
c. Making or threatening retaliation after a negative response to sexual advances.
d. Visual conduct such as leering, making sexual gestures, displaying sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons, calendars or posters.
e. Verbal conduct such as using epithets or slurs, telling sexually explicit jokes, or making derogatory or suggestive comments about a person's body or dress.
f. Written communications of a sexual nature distributed in hard copy, soft copy or via a computer network.
g. Verbal abuse of a sexual nature, graphic verbal commentary about an individual's body, sexually degrading words to describe an individual, suggestive or obscene letters, notes or invitations.
h. Physical conduct such as touching, assaulting, impeding or blocking movements.
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1697
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 6 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: HARASSMENT POLICY Revised From:
7/27/09
5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95. 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 i. Retaliation for making harassment reports or threatening to report harassment.
D. Affordable Care Act (ACA) Anti-Retaliation
Pursuant to section §1558 of the Affordable Care Act, the City prohibits discrimination or retaliation towards any employee who:
1. Receives a health insurance tax credit or subsidy through the Health Care "Marketplace" or "Exchange", by which can trigger a penalty payable by the employer;
2. Reports potential violations of protections afforded under Title I of the Act, which provides guaranteed availability protections among other things;
3. Testifies in a proceeding concerning such violation;
4. Assists or participates in a proceeding concerning a violation; or
5. Objects to, or refuses to participate in, any activity, policy, practice, or assigned task that the employee reasonably believes to be in violation of any provision of the Title I of the Act.
An employee who believes that he or she has been discharged or otherwise discriminated against in violation of section §1558 of the Affordable Care Act may seek relief in accordance with the procedures, notifications, burdens of proof, remedies, and statutes of limitation set forth in section 2087(b) of title 15, United States Code.
IV. REPORTING AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
A. Immediate Action Required
The City's reporting and complaint procedures provide for an immediate, thorough and objective investigation of discrimination or harassment claims, appropriate disciplinary action taken against any person found to have engaged in prohibited behavior, and appropriate alternative remedies to any
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1698
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 7 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY 7/27/09 5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 employee or non-employee subject to discrimination or harassment. To accomplish this, such incidents must be reported immediately to a supervisor or manager.
1. Employee's and Non-Employee's Responsibilities when Subjected to Discrimination and/or Harassment
a. Employees or non-employees who believe they have been subjected to discrimination or harassment, or are aware of discrimination or harassment against others, shall report the situation immediately to his/her supervisor or manager, except as specified in subsection (b), below. Employees and nonemployees shall report any such incidents occurring in the workplace, whether committed by coworkers, supervisors or managers, or third persons doing business with the City, such as customers or vendors, or other non-employees. If
comfortable doing so, an employee or non-employee who has a complaint of discrimination or harassment is encouraged to directly inform the person(s) engaging in the behavior that such conduct is offensive and insist the behavior to stop.
b. Employees and non-employees must immediately contact a supervisor or manager to register a complaint of discrimination or harassment, unless that supervisor or manager is the individual engaging in the unwanted behavior. In that case, the employee or non-employee may contact someone at the next supervisory level. If the employee or non-employee feels uncomfortable dealing directly with his or her immediate supervisor or manager, he or she may contact the department head, or the Director of Human Resources (or either of their designees) to register a complaint of discrimination or harassment.
c. Employees and non-employees may file a formal complaint of harassment or discrimination with their department head or
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1699
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 8 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT POLICY Effective Date: Revised From:
7/27/09
5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment In the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 with Human Resources. To assist the City in conducting a thorough investigation, complaints shall be submitted in writing and shall include specific details of the incident(s), the names of the individuals involved, the names of any witnesses, and any documentary evidence (notes, pictures, cartoons, etc.) that will corroborate the allegations.
d. Employees and non-employees shall immediately report any retaliation to a supervisor, manager, department head or Director of Human Resources (or designee). All retaliation complaints shall be immediately, objectively and thoroughly investigated in accordance with the investigation procedures.
If a report of retaliation is substantiated, appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including discharge shall be taken.
2. Supervisor's or Manager's Responsibilities to Eliminate Discrimination and/or Harassment
a. A supervisor or manager is responsible for enforcing the City's discrimination and harassment policy. Supervisors or
managers must ensure that all employees and non-employees are aware of the City's policy through open discussion of the policy at staff meetings and by posting the policy in a conspicuous location accessible to all staff members.
b. A supervisor or manager shall be cognizant of employees' and non-employees' behavior and shall not permit any employee or non-employee under their supervision to be subjected to or engage in any conduct prohibited by this policy.
c. A supervisor or manager who observes conduct prohibited by this policy shall immediately direct the employee or nonemployee to cease the conduct.
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1700
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 9 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY Effective Date:
7/27/09
5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 d. A supervisor or manager who receives a complaint of
prohibited conduct is required to take the complaint seriously, and report the matter immediately to the department head; be supportive of the complainant; ensure there is no retaliation against the complainant; conduct an internal fact-finding review into the allegations; obtain as much detailed information as possible; thoroughly document the findings; communicate in written form to the parties the resolution of the complaint; and report to and consult with the Human Resources Department promptly, without delay.
B. Confidentiality. The City will make every effort to protect the privacy and confidentiality of all parties involved, as well as any information and/or documentation obtained, to the extent possible consistent with a thorough investigation.
C. Penalty for Non-Compliance. The City shall take disciplinary action, up to and including discharge, against any supervisor or manager who fails in his/her responsibility to take immediate action in response to an employee's or non-employee's complaint of discrimination or harassment. Further, such disciplinary action shall be taken against a supervisor or manager who fails to stop discriminatory or harassing conduct committed in his/her presence or to stop such conduct about which the supervisor or manager has knowledge.
V. INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES
A. Determination of Responsibility for Investigation
If a formal complaint is filed with the department head or the Director of Human Resources (or either of their designees), the department head and the Director of Human Resources shall consult with one another to determine whether the department or Human Resources shall conduct the fact-finding investigation into the allegations. Either the department head or the Director of Human Resources (or either of their designees), depending on who is
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1701
Subject:
B.
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No.10 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY 7/27/09 5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment In the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 responsible for the investigation, shall issue written notification to the complainant and alleged harasser(s). The notification shall specify the nature of the complaint, and inform the parties that an investigation into the allegations of discrimination and/or harassment shall be conducted.
Investigative Guidelines
The investigation shall include the following steps taken in the order best suited to the circumstances:
1. Identify and preserve the evidence.
2. Confirm the name and position of the complainant. Interview the complainant.
3. Allow the complainant the opportunity to place the complaint in writing.
4. Obtain the identity of the alleged harasser(s).
5. Obtain as many details as possible regarding the incident(s) that prompted the complaint, including the number of occurrences, dates, times, locations, and witnesses (if applicable).
6. Ascertain how the complainant felt about the alleged incident when it occurred; complainant's response(s) to the alleged behavior; and witness statements (if applicable).
7. Ascertain if any threats or promises were made in connection with the alleged harassment.
8. Ascertain if the complainant knows of or suspects that there are other victims of harassment by the same person(s).
9. Ascertain whether the complainant has spoken to anyone, especially
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1702
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 11 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT POLICY Effective Date: Revised From:
7/27/09
5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment m the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 supervisors, about the harassment.
10. Ascertain what resolution would be acceptable to the complainant.
11. Interview the alleged harasser to get his or her side of the story, including any possible motivation for a false allegation.
12. Interview witnesses who were identified by the complainant regarding the alleged harasser or other persons identified during the investigation.
13. Interview witnesses who were identified by the alleged harasser or other persons identified during the investigation.
14. Advise all participants that the investigation is "confidential" and not to engage in any retaliatory conduct, as such conduct is subject to disciplinary action up to and including discharge. Confidentiality will be maintained to the extent possible. An individual who is interviewed during the course of an investigation is prohibited from discussing the substance of the interview, except as otherwise directed by a supervisor or the Director of Human Resources. Any individual who discusses the content of an investigatory interview will be subject to discipline or other appropriate sanction.
15. Conduct follow-up interviews, if warranted.
16. Prepare report of findings and discuss with management and designated legal staff.
VI. RESPONDING TO THE COMPLAINT
A. Following the completion of the fact-finding investigation, either the department head or the Director of Human Resources (or either of their designees), depending on who is responsible for the investigation, shall
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1703
Subject:
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Directive No. HR-15 Page No.12 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY 7/27/09 5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 make a report of findings, along with a recommendation regarding the appropriate remedial action to be taken, if warranted. The recommendation shall be made after reviewing the findings of the investigation, giving consideration to all factual information, the nature of the alleged conduct, and the totality of the circumstances. If the investigation was conducted by the Director of Human Resources, or designee, the Director, or designee, shall confer with the affected department head and both shall concur on the remedial action to be taken, if any. If the investigation was conducted by the department head, the department head shall confer with the Director of Human Resources prior to making the report of findings and both shall concur on the remedial action to be taken, if any.
B. If either the department head or the Director of Human Resources does not concur with the findings and recommendation of the other, the City Attorney (or designee) shall review and resolve the matter in dispute.
C. Report of findings and recommendation shall be treated as a confidential document and no other distribution shall be made without first consulting with the City Attorney's Office. A completed investigation report will not be disclosed, except as it is deemed necessary to support a disciplinary action, to take remedial action, to defend the City in adversarial proceedings, or to comply with the law or court order.
D. Either the department head or the Director of Human Resources (or either of their designees), depending on who is responsible for the investigation shall provide a written response to the complainant and the person alleged to have committed the misconduct, discrimination and/or harassment. The response shall include a copy of the City's discrimination and harassment policy and a memorandum indicating the City's determination as to whether the complaint is:
1. Unsustained: The investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation(s).
2. Unfounded: The investigation proved that the act(s) or omission(s)
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1704
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Subject: Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 13 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND Effective Date: Revised From: HARASSMENT POLICY 7/27/09
3. 5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 complained of did not occur. The finding also applies when the individual employee(s) named in the complaint were not involved in the act(s) or omission(s) alleged.
Sustained: The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation(s) made in the complaint; appropriate action will be taken.
E. Details regarding any specific fact-findings or disciplinary action to be taken will not be communicated to the complainant. The City Attorney shall review the response for legal sufficiency before dissemination.
F. The City shall close and retain the investigation file, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and City policy regarding retention of City records.
VII. DISCIPLINE
Disciplinary action imposed as a result of any investigation conducted pursuant to this policy shall be commensurate with the severity of the offense, up to and including discharge, even for a first offense.
VIII. ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES
If upon exhausting all internal remedies to file, investigate, and respond to a charges of discrimination/harassment, pursuant to title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C §§ 2000e et seq.), any person has a right to file a charge of discrimination/harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). In addition, pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §§ 12900 - 12996.) a person may also file a complaint of discrimination/harassment with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing ("DFEH"). Employees or non-employees who believe that they have been subjected to discrimination/harassment may file a complaint with either of these
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1705
CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
CITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE
Subject: Directive No. HR-15 Page No. 14 of 14
DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT POLICY Effective Date: Revised From:
7/27/09
5/1/2015 4/6/09
3/1/2010
(see below)
PER-015 (Sexual Harassment in the Workplace) revised from 10/21/94, 5/1/95, 1/1/98 PER-037 (Sexual Harassment Investigative Procedures) revised from 2/15/93 agencies. Both the EEOC and DFEH serve as neutral fact-finders and attempt to assist parties in resolving disputes voluntarily.
IX. COMMUNICATION OF POLICY
This policy shall be provided to all managers, supervisors, employees, volunteers, unpaid interns, agents or contractors of the City and shall be posted in the appropriate places. All employees shall participate in City approved harassment awareness training as directed by management or Human Resources; and all supervisors, as required by law, shall participate in City approved interactive harassment awareness training and education sessions at least once every two years, or as otherwise specified by law.
APPROVED:
c:r��SON
CITY MANAGER
::ODMA\GRPWISE\COS.PER.PER_Library:96180.1
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT 1 1706
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0549, Version: 1
RESOLUTION TO DESIGNATE ADDITIONAL STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS AND AMEND THE “STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE”
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to amend the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 10.04.270 as follows:
1. Add new intersections:
a. Bess Place and Star Way (4-way stop control)
b. Bieghle Street and Tenth Street (4-way stop control) c. French Camp Road and McDougald Boulevard (3-way stop control) d. Kelley Drive and Stanfield Drive (3-way stop control) e. Plymouth Road and Swain Road (4-way stop control)
f. Riccardo Drive and Zaccaria Way (2-way stop control) g. West Lane East Frontage Road and West Lane Frontage Road (4-way stop control)
2. Add intersection that was inadvertently omitted:
a. Eighth Street and Madison Street (4-way stop control)
3. Remove existing intersections:
a. Eighth Street and Lincoln Street (roundabout)
b. Filbert Street and Miner Avenue (traffic signal)
c. Hammertown Drive and Montauban Avenue (roundabout)
d. Knickerbocker Drive and Tam O’Shanter Drive (roundabout) It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.
Summary
The City installs stop controls (stop signs) to assign right-of-way and promote orderly traffic flow.
Pursuant to the Stockton Municipal Code (SMC), stop sign installation is authorized by Council resolution, either by designation of intersections where stop signs are warranted or by designation of through streets where side streets become stop controlled.
Staff received 58 requests for stop signs since the last update of the Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule on June 9, 2020. Staff made observations and conducted an engineering analysis at each City of Stockton Page 1 of 5 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1707
File #: 23-0549, Version: 1
of the intersections. Following the warrants and options established by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), staff recommends that Council adopt a resolution amending the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add the following streets:
a. Bess Place and Star Way
b. Bieghle Street and Tenth Street
c. French Camp Road and McDougald Boulevard
d. Kelley Drive and Stanfield Drive
e. Plymouth Road and Swain Road
f. Riccardo Drive and Zaccaria Way
g. West Lane East Frontage Road and West Lane Frontage Road If approved, the installation of stop signs and associated pavement markings will be installed by City staff at these locations (Attachment A).
Staff will also take this opportunity to amend the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” by adding an intersection that was inadvertently omitted and removing intersections that were converted to roundabouts or a traffic signal.
DISCUSSION
Background
The City installs stop controls (stop signs) to assign right-of-way and promote orderly traffic flow. Stop signs can be authorized by Council resolution, either by designation of intersections where stop signs are warranted or by designation of through streets where side streets become stop controlled. These authorized locations are recorded on either the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” or the “Through Street Schedule,” which are maintained by the Public Works Department. Pursuant to SMC section 10.04.270, a Council resolution is required to designate intersections as stop controlled or to amend the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule.”
The “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” was last updated by Council on June 9, 2020, by Resolution No. 2020-06-09-1114. Since that time, residents have requested staff review 58 locations in need of stop controls. Traffic volume counts, and other field information were collected, and collision data was analyzed. For the majority of the 58 locations, preliminary engineering and traffic surveys concluded that the warrants established by the CA MUTCD had not been met. However, field observations, accident history, and volume counts support warrants for locations identified at seven intersections.
Present Situation
Based on engineering analysis and field reviews, staff determined that warrants were met for installation of additional stop signs at the following seven locations:
a. Bess Place and Star Way
b. Bieghle Street and Tenth Street
c. French Camp Road and McDougald Boulevard
City of Stockton Page 2 of 5 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1708
File #: 23-0549, Version: 1
d. Kelley Drive and Stanfield Drive
e. Plymouth Road and Swain Road
f. Riccardo Drive and Zaccaria Way
g. West Lane East Frontage Road and West Lane Frontage Road A general description of field conditions and the assessment of each location is provided below.
Bess Place and Star Way: Star Way is a north-south residential street that intersects Bess Place, adjacent to Great Valley Elementary School. There is an existing two-way stop control on Bess Place with a yellow crosswalk on the east approach of Bess Place. The CA MUTCD allows all-way stop signs to be installed to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes if traffic engineering judgment attests to the need. An Engineering and Traffic Survey has been prepared to assess and recommend the need for additional stop control at this location (Attachment B).
Bieghle Street and Tenth Street: Tenth Street is an east-west residential street that intersects Bieghle Street, adjacent to Martin Van Buren Elementary School. There is an existing two-way stop control on Bieghle Street. This intersection is within proximity to a school and church. There is heavy vehicle and pedestrian traffic when the school day begins and at dismissal. The CA MUTCD allows all-way stop signs to be installed to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes if traffic engineering judgment attests to the need. An Engineering and Traffic Survey has been prepared to assess and recommend the need for additional stop control at this location (Attachment C).
French Camp Road and McDougald Boulevard: French Camp Road is an east-west arterial street that intersects McDougald Boulevard at a “T” on the southern edge of the Weston Ranch subdivision.
There is an existing one-way stop control on McDougald Boulevard, a north-south major collector street that crosses Weston Ranch from Carolyn Weston Boulevard to French Camp Road. The speed limit is 50 mph on French Camp Road and 35 mph on McDougald Boulevard. The traffic volumes on the streets meet the criteria established by the CA MUTCD for installation of all-way stop control (Attachment D).
Kelley Drive and Stanfield Drive: Kelley Drive is a north-south residential street that intersects Stanfield Drive at a “T.” There is an existing one-way stop control on Stanfield Drive, a street that terminates at Kelley Drive. There is a horizontal curve along Kelley Drive which is an obstruction to corner sight distance looking to the north. This condition meets the criteria established by the CA MUTCD for installation of all-way stop control at the intersection (Attachment E).
Plymouth Road and Swain Road: Swain Road is an east-west major collector street that intersects with Plymouth Road. Plymouth Road is a collector street to the north of the intersection and a residential street to the south. The speed limit on these streets is 30 mph. There is an existing twoway stop control for Plymouth Road. The traffic volumes on the streets meet the criteria established by the CA MUTCD for installation of 4-way stop control. Swain Road, east of Plymouth Road, is within San Joaquin County jurisdiction. Traffic Engineering staff have contacted the San Joaquin County Public Works Department and will coordinate the installation of a stop sign, stop limit line, and STOP street legend for that approach (Attachment F).
City of Stockton Page 3 of 5 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1709
File #: 23-0549, Version: 1
Riccardo Drive and Zaccaria Way: Zaccaria Way is an east-west residential street that intersects Riccardo Drive within the Cannery Park/La Morada subdivision near Mosher Elementary School. The speed limit on these streets is 25 mph. Due to the proximity of the intersection to the school zone and volume of school traffic, the City received complaints of lack of stop control at the intersection. The traffic volumes on the streets meet the criteria established by the CA MUTCD for installation of 2-way stop control on Zaccaria Way (Attachment G).
West Lane East Frontage Road and West Lane Frontage Road: West Lane East Frontage Road and West Lane Frontage Road are auxiliary streets to West Lane, which provide lower-speed access to businesses east of West Lane and south of Hammer Lane. The intersection of West Lane East Frontage Road and West Lane Frontage Road is located adjacent to commercial centers. There is an existing two-way stop control for West Lane Frontage Road. Due to increased traffic to the nearby shopping centers, traffic volumes at the intersection now meet the criteria established by the CA MUTCD for installation of 4-way stop control (Attachment H).
It is recommended that Council adopt a resolution designating the above locations as intersections at which vehicles are required to stop pursuant to SMC section 10.04.270. Staff will amend the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” (Exhibit 1 to Resolution) accordingly.
Staff will also take this opportunity to amend the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” by adding an intersection, Eighth Street/Madison Street (4-way stop control), which was erroneously unlisted when the City acquired this as an existing 4-way stop controlled intersection in the McKinley Annexation of 1969. Additional amendments include removing intersections that were converted to roundabouts or a traffic signal: Eighth Street/Lincoln Street (roundabout), Filbert Street/Miner Avenue (traffic signal), Hammertown Drive/Montauban Avenue (roundabout), and Knickerbocker Drive/Tam O’Shanter Drive (roundabout).
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Installation work will be performed by City staff. The estimated cost for the signs and pavement marking, including materials and staff costs, is approximately $10,000. This kind of project is planned in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Public Works Operations and Maintenance budget annually. There is sufficient funding in the Street Maintenance Traffic Devices/Sign Shop Operating Budget for this work.
There is no impact to the City’s General Fund or any other unrestricted fund as a result of taking the recommended actions.
Attachment A - Vicinity Map - Additional Stop Controlled Intersections 2023 Attachment B - Map “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add BESS PLACE/STAR WAY - 4-Way Stop
Attachment C - Map “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add BIEGHLE STREET/TENTH STREET - 4-Way Stop
Attachment D - Map “stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add FRENCH CAMP ROAD/MCDOUGALD BOULEVARD 3-Way Stop
City of Stockton Page 4 of 5 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1710
File #: 23-0549, Version: 1
Attachment E - Map “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add KELLEY DRIVE/STANFIELD DRIVE - 3-Way Stop
Attachment F - Map “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add PLYMOUTH ROAD/SWAIN ROAD - 4-Way Stop
Attachment G - Map “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add Riccardo Drive/ ZACCARIA WAY - 2-Way Stop
Attachment H - Map “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add WEST LANE EAST FRONTAGE ROAD/WEST LANE FRONTAGE ROAD - 4-Way Stop
City of Stockton Page 5 of 5 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1711
City of Stockton, CA
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 06/01/2022
Data updated 06/02/2022
Print map scale is approximate.
Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 12282.396595732864 ft
ATTACHMENT A 1712
City of Stockton, CA
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 08/01/2022
Data updated 07/06/2022
Print map scale is approximate.
Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 198.72629860312398 ft
ATTACHMENT B
Amend “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add:
BESS PLACE/STAR WAY - 4-Way Stop
Existing Stop Sign
Proposed Stop Sign
1713
City of Stockton, CA
Property Information
Property ID 16927007-106087
Location 1628 E TENTH ST
Owner STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 06/01/2022
Data updated 06/02/2022
Print map scale is approximate.
Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 96.01325864890492 ft
ATTACHMENT C
Amend “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add:
BIEGHLE STREET/TENTH STREET - 4-Way Stop
Existing Stop Sign
Proposed Stop Sign
1714
City of Stockton, CA
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 02/03/2023
Data updated 02/03/2023
Print map scale is approximate.
Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 193.77188207870745 ft
ATTACHMENT D
Existing Stop Sign
Proposed Stop Sign
Amend "Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule" to add:
FRENCH CAMP ROAD/MCDOUGALD BLVD - 3-Way Stop
1715
City of Stockton, CA
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 06/01/2022
Data updated 06/02/2022
Print map scale is approximate.
Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 126.90698285825228 ft
ATTACHMENT E
Existing Stop Sign
Proposed Stop Sign
Amend “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add:
KELLEY DRIVE/STANFIELD DRIVE - 3-Way Stop
1716
City of Stockton, CA
Property Information
Property ID 11325003-52423
Location 851 W MENDOCINO AV
Owner CAMERON, REBECCA M
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 11/03/2021
Data updated 11/03/2021
Print map scale is approximate.
Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 181.9311365644862 ft
ATTACHMENT F
Amend “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add:
PLYMOUTH ROAD/SWAIN ROAD - 4-Way Stop
Proposed Stop Sign
Existing Stop Sign
Outside City Limits
1717
City of Stockton, CA
Property Information
Property ID 10233104-86286
Location 523 SUMMIT PL
Owner SANTOS, ERNEST G TR
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 03/04/2021
Data updated 03/01/2021
1" = 321 ft
ATTACHMENT G
Amend “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add:
Riccardo Drive/ZACCARIA WAY - 2-Way Stop
Proposed Stop Sign
ZACCARIA WAY
RICCARDO DR
1718
City of Stockton, CA
Property Information
Property ID 16918007-10316
Location 1658 S AIRPORT WY
Owner CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.
Geometry updated 09/16/2021
Data updated 09/08/2021
Print map scale is approximate.
Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 211.65604810604975 ft
ATTACHMENT H
Amend “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” to add:
WEST LANE EAST FRONTAGE ROAD/WEST LANE FRONTAGE ROAD - 4-Way Stop Proposed Stop Sign
Existing Stop Sign
West Lane East Frontage Rd
West Lane Frontage Rd
1719
Resolution No.
STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ADDITIONAL STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS AND AMENDING THE “STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE” The City of Stockton installs stop controls (stop signs) to assign right-of-way and promote orderly traffic flow; and
Pursuant to the Stockton Municipal Code (SMC), stop sign installation is authorized by Council resolution, either by designation of intersections where stop signs are warranted or by designation of through streets where side streets become stop controlled. These authorized locations are recorded on either the “Stop Controlled Intersection Schedule” or the “Through Street Schedule”, which are maintained by the Public Works Department; and
Residents expressed concerns regarding safety and traffic flow at the following intersection locations:
a. Bess Place and Star Way
b. Beighle Street and Tenth Street
c. French Camp Road and McDougald Boulevard
d. Kelley Drive and Stanfield Drive
e. Plymouth Road and Swain Road
f. Riccardo Drive and Zaccaria Way
g. West Lane East Frontage Road and West Lane Frontage Road Based on engineering analysis and field reviews, existing stop controls at the noted intersections will be converted to 2-way, 3-way, and 4-way stop controls to improve safety and traffic operations; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council authorizes an amendment to the “STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE” adopted by Resolution No. 85-0065 on January 28, 1985, as follows:
(a) The following named intersections are hereby designated “STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS”, and stop signs shall control the approaches of the streets with all letters capitalized:
//
//
1720
SECTION B:
Add: BESS PLACE/STAR WAY 4-Way Stop
Add: BIEGHLE STREET/TENTH STREET 4-Way Stop
SECTION F:
Add: FRENCH CAMP ROAD/MCDOUGALD 3-Way Stop
BOULEVARD
SECTION K:
Add: KELLEY DRIVE/STANFIELD DRIVE 3-Way Stop
SECTION P:
Add: PLYMOUTH ROAD/SWAIN ROAD 4-Way Stop
SECTION R:
Add: Riccardo Drive/ZACCARIA WAY 2-Way Stop
SECTION W:
Add: WEST LANE EAST FRONTAGE ROAD/ 4-Way Stop
WEST LANE FRONTAGE ROAD
(b) The following named intersection that was inadvertently omitted is hereby designated “STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION”, and stop signs shall control the approaches of the streets with all letters capitalized:
SECTION E:
Add: EIGHTH STREET/MADISON STREET 4-Way Stop
(c) The following named intersections have been converted to roundabouts or traffic signals and are to be removed from the “STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE”:
SECTION E:
Remove: EIGHTH STREET/LINCOLN STREET 4-Way Stop
SECTION F:
1721
Remove: FILBERT STREET/MINER AVENUE 4-Way Stop
SECTION H:
Remove: HAMMERTOWN DRIVE/ 4-Way Stop
MONTAUBAN AVENUE
SECTION K:
Remove: KNICKERBOCKER DRIVE/ 4-Way Stop
TAM O’SHANTER DRIVE
A copy of the “STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE” is attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference.
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED August 22, 2023 .
________________________
KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1722
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: A
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
A STREET/Lafayette Street 2‐Way
A STREET/Marsh Street 1‐Way
A Street/SONORA STREET 2‐Way
A Street/WASHINGTON STREET 1‐Way
A Street/WEBER AVENUE 2‐Way
A.G. SPANOS BOULEVARD/IRON CANYON CIRCLE (N) 3‐Way
A.G. SPANOS BOULEVARD/IRON CANYON CIRCLE (S) 4‐Way
ACACIA STREET/BAKER STREET 4‐Way
ACACIA STREET/Carlton Avenue 2‐Way
Acacia Street/E STREET 2‐Way
ACACIA STREET/F Street 2‐Way
ACACIA STREET/HUNTER STREET 4‐Way
ACACIA STREET/MADISON STREET 4‐Way
ACACIA STREET/Pilgrim Street 2‐Way
ACACIA STREET/San Juan Avenue 2‐Way
ACACIA STREET/Union Street 2‐Way
ACACIA STREET/YOSEMITE STREET 4‐Way
Adams Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way
ADAMS STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way
ADMIRAL DRIVE/Bainbridge Place – NEW 2‐Way
AGUSTA COURT/OTTO DRIVE 3‐Way
ALABAMA AVENUE/Chicago Avenue 2‐Way
ALDER STREET/Commerce Street 2‐Way
ALEXANDRIA PLACE/LINCOLN ROAD 3‐Way
ALEXANDRIA PLACE/MEADOW AVENUE 4‐Way
Allegheny Place/MILL SPRINGS DRIVE 1‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/BEDFORD ROAD 4‐Way
Allston Way/BRISTOL AVENUE 2‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/Lexington Avenue 2‐Way
Allston Way/MARIPOSA AVENUE 2‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/MONTEREY AVENUE 4‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/North Central Avenue 2‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/North Regent Street 2‐Way
Allston Way/NORTH TUXEDO AVENUE 2‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/South Central Avenue 2‐Way
Allston Way/SOUTH REGENT STREET 2‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/South Tuxedo Avenue 2‐Way
ALLSTON WAY/WALNUT STREET 4‐Way
Alma Street/McDONNEL AVENUE 2‐Way
ALMA STREET/Sharon Avenue 2‐Way
ALPINE AVENUE/KENSINGTON WAY 3‐Way
ALPINE AVENUE/MISSION ROAD 4‐Way
EXHIBIT 1 1723
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 ALTURAS AVENUE/BENJAMIN HOLT DRIVE 4‐Way
ALTURAS AVENUE/Glendora Avenue 2‐Way
Alvarado Avenue/ESSEX STREET 2‐Way
Alvarado Avenue/FULTON STREET 2‐Way
AMAREETTO STREET (GOVERNOR CIRCLE)/LORRAINE AVENUE 4‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Anderson Street 2‐Way American Street/CHANNEL STREET 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Church Street 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Clay Street 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Eighth Street 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/ESSEX STREET ‐ NEW 1‐Way
AMERICAN STREET/FIFTH STREET 2‐Way American Street/FIRST STREET 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Fourth Street 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Fremont Street 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/JACKSON STREET 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Jefferson Street 2‐Way American Street/LINDSAY STREET 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Second Street 2‐Way American Street/SEVENTH STREET 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Sixth Street 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/THIRD STREET 2‐Way AMERICAN STREET/Worth Street 2‐Way Anderson Street/BIEGHLE STREET 2‐Way ANDERSON STREET/CALIFORNIA STREET 4‐Way
Anderson Street/EUGENIA STREET 1‐Way ANDERSON STREET/Golden Gate Avenue 2‐Way
Anderson Street/GRANT STREET 2‐Way Anderson Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way ANDERSON STREET/Madison Street 2‐Way
Anderson Street/MONROE STREET 2‐Way ANDERSON STREET/Stanislaus Street 2‐Way ANDERSON STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way ANDERSON STREET/Van Buren Street 2‐Way
Anderson Street/WINDSOR AVENUE 2‐Way
ANITA STREET/E Street 2‐Way ANITA STREET/F STREET 4‐Way ANNE STREET/EIGHTH STREET 4‐Way ANNE STREET/TENTH STREET 4‐Way ARCADE STREET/Bonnie Lane 1‐Way Arcade Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way Arcade Street/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way Arden Lane/Aylesford Lane/HILLCREST AVENUE 2‐Way
ARDEN LANE/CHERBOURG WAY 3‐Way ARGONAUT STREET/EIGHTH STREET 3‐Way
Argonaut Street/FLORA STREET 2‐Way Argonaut Street/MAGNOLIA STREET 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1724
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 Argonaut Street/MIDDLEFIELD AVENUE 2‐Way ARGONAUT STREET/Poplar Street 2‐Way ARGONNE DRIVE/PICARDY DRIVE/MT. DIABLO 3‐Way
ARMOR DRIVE/DUCHESS LANE 3‐Way Ash Street/CHURCH STREET 2‐Way ASH STREET/Marsh Street 2‐Way Ash Street/SCOTTS AVENUE 2‐Way Ash Street/SONORA STREET 2‐Way
ATCHENSON STREET/MONTAUBAN AVENUE 4‐Way
Atlee Street/COMMERCE STREET 2‐Way Aurora Street/CHANNEL STREET 2‐Way AURORA STREET/First Street 2‐Way Aurora Street/FOURTH STREET 1‐Way Aurora Street/FREMONT STREET 2‐Way AURORA STREET/HAZELTON AVENUE 4‐Way Aurora Street/JACKSON STREET 2‐Way Aurora Street/JEFFERSON STREET 2‐Way AURORA STREET/LAFAYETTE STREET 4‐Way AURORA STREET/Lindsay Street 2‐Way Aurora Street/SECOND STREET 2‐Way AURORA STREET/Third Street 2‐Way AURORA STREET/WEBER AVENUE 4‐Way
EXHIBIT 1 1725
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: B
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
B STREET/HAZELTON AVENUE 4‐Way BAINBRIDGE PLACE/STANFIELD DRIVE 3‐Way BAINBRIDGE PLACE/WAGNER HEIGHTS ROAD 4‐Way BAKER STREET/Bedford Road 1‐Way BAKER STREET/HARDING WAY 4‐Way Baker Place/KENSINGTON WAY 1‐Way Baker Street/LEXINGTON AVENUE 1‐Way BARRYMORE STREET/Commerce Street 2‐Way Bass Road/MARINERS DRIVE 1‐Way
BEATRICE AVENUE/Poplar Street 2‐Way BEAUFORT AVENUE/KELLEY DRIVE 3‐Way BEAUFORT AVENUE/SARATOGA WAY 4‐Way Bedford Road/CONCORD AVENUE/LEXINGTON AVENUE 2‐Way Bedford Road/LEXINGTON AVENUE 1‐Way BELLEVIEW STREET/ELEVENTH STREET 4‐Way BELVEDERE AVENUE/Flora Street 1‐Way Benjamin Holt Drive/HEMET AVENUE 2‐Way BERNAY DRIVE/BORDEAUX AVENUE 4‐Way BESS PLACE/STAR WAY 4‐Way
BIANCHI ROAD/CLAREMONT AVENUE 3‐Way BIANCHI ROAD/DORSET STREET 3‐Way BIANCHI ROAD/HILLSOBORO WAY/TOWNEHOME DRIVE 4‐Way BIEGHLE STREET/TENTH STREET 4‐Way
BISMARK PLACE/OTTO DRIVE 4‐Way BLACKSWAIN STREET/MARINERS DRIVE 3‐Way BLAIN AVENUE/Hunter Street 2‐Way Blain Avenue/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 2‐Way BLAIN AVENUE/Sutter Street 1‐Way BLUE FOX WAY/WAGNER HEIGHTS ROAD 3‐Way BOEING WAY/POCK LANE 4‐Way
Bonnie Lane/ELLIS STREET 1‐Way Bonnie Lane/EUCLID AVENUE 2‐Way Bonnie Lane/GEARY STREET 1‐Way Bonnie Lane/KNOLES WAY 2‐Way Bonnie Lane/MARIPOSA AVENUE 1‐Way Bonnie Lane/MENDOCINO AVENUE 1‐Way Bonnie Lane/NOBLE STREET 1‐Way Bonnie Lane/SONOMA AVENUE 1‐Way BONNIE LANE/Stadium Drive 2‐Way BONNIEBROOK DRIVE/OAKCREEK DRIVE 4‐Way Bonniebrook Drive/WESTLAND AVENUE 2‐Way BORDEAUX AVENUE/LE MANS AVENUE 4‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1726
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 BRATTLE PLACE/WAUDMAN AVENUE 3‐Way
BRANSTETTER PLACE/DON AVENUE/WAGNER HEIGHTS ROAD 4‐Way BRENTWOOD DRIVE/RIVARA ROAD 4‐Way Bristol Avenue/CLARENDON AVENUE 2‐Way BRISTOL AVENUE/Manchester Avenue 2‐Way Broadway Avenue/ELEANOR AVENUE 2‐Way BROOKSIDE ROAD/GLEN EAGLES DRIVE 3‐Way BROOKSIDE ROAD/FEATHER RIVER DRIVE 3‐Way BROOKSIDE ROAD/MCGAW STREET 3‐Way BROOKSIDE ROAD/SHADOWBROOK DRIVE 3‐Way
BROOKSIDE ROAD‐RIVERBROOK DRIVE/DRIFTWOOD PLACE‐BROOK VALLEY CIRCLE 4‐Way DRIFTWOOD PLACE‐BROOK VALLEY CIRCLE 4‐Way Buena Vista Avenue/FIELD AVENUE 1‐Way BUENA VISTA AVENUE/HARDING WAY 4‐Way BUENA VISTA AVENUE/LUCERNE AVENUE 4‐Way
BUENA VISTA AVENUE/MONTE DIABLO AVENUE 4‐Way BUNKER HILL DRIVE/Saratoga Way 1‐Way BURGUNDY DRIVE/Lorraine Avenue 1‐Way Burke Bradley Drive/PRECISSI LANE 1‐Way BURKETT AVENUE/Lafayette Street 1‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1727
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: C
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
C Street/MAIN STREET 2‐Way C Street/MARKET STREET 2‐Way C Street/MYRTLE STREET 2‐Way C Street/WASHINGTON STREET 2‐Way Cabin Creek Street/PINE BROOK DRIVE 2‐Way
CABIN CREEK STREET/Twin Bridges Lane 1‐Way CALIFORNIA STREET/HAZELTON AVENUE 4‐Way CAMERON WAY/Leesburg Place 2‐Way Carlton Avenue/HARDING WAY 2‐Way Caywood Drive/MILLWOOD AVENUE 2‐Way CAYWOOD DRIVE/TUSCANY CIRCLE 3‐Way 3‐Way
CAYWOOD DRIVE/VALMORA DRIVE 4‐Way Caywood Drive/WESTMORA AVENUE 2‐Way Cemetery Lane/HAWTHORNE STREET 1‐Way Cemetery Lane/MAPLE STREET 1‐Way Cemetery Lane/WYANDOTTE STREET 1‐Way CENTER STREET/MONTEREY AVENUE 4‐Way CHANNEL STREET/Grant Street 2‐Way CHANNEL STREET/Pilgrim Street 2‐Way CHANNEL STREET/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 4‐Way CHANNEL STREET/Sierra Nevada Street 2‐Way CHANNEL STREET/Stanislaus Street 2‐Way CHANNEL STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way Chaparral Way/CODY WAY 2‐Way CHAPARRAL WAY/DAVIS ROAD 4‐Way Chaparral Way/HICKCOCK DRIVE 2‐Way CHATEAU DRIVE/KNICKERBOCKER DRIVE 4‐Way CHAUNCY CIRCLE/STANFIELD DRIVE 3‐Way CHERBOURG WAY/Neubourg Drive 1‐Way CHERBOURG WAY/PYRENEES AVENUE 4‐Way CHERBOURG WAY/SANDALWOOD DRIVE 4‐Way CHRISTINA AVENUE/Grange Avenue 2‐Way CHURCH STREET/Commerce Street 2‐Way CHURCH STREET/GARFIELD STREET 4‐Way CHURCH STREET/Grant Street 2‐Way Church Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way CHURCH STREET/Laurel Street 2‐Way CHURCH STREET/McDonnell Avenue 2‐Way Church Street/PERSHING AVENUE 2‐Way CHURCH Street/PILGRIM STREET 2‐Way CHURCH STREET/Sharon Avenue 2‐Way Church Street/SIERRA NEVADA STREET 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1728
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 CHURCH STREET/Stanislaus Street 2‐Way CHURCH STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way Church Street/UNION STREET 2‐Way Church Street/YOSEMITE STREET 2‐Way Churchill Street/COMMERCE STREET 2‐Way CHURCHILL STREET/SUTTER STREET 4‐Way Claremont Avenue/JAMESTOWN STREET 2‐Way
CLAREMONT AVENUE/Longview Avenue 2‐Way CLAREMONT AVENUE/Mayfair Avenue 2‐Way CLAREMONT AVENUE/Nottingham Drive 2‐Way CLAREMONT AVENUE/ROBINHOOD DRIVE 3‐Way CLARENDON AVENUE/Oxford Way 2‐Way CLAY STREET/Grant Street 2‐Way CLAY STREET/Hunter Street 2‐Way Clay Street/MADISON AVENUE 2‐Way CLAY STREET/Monroe Street 2‐Way CLAY STREET/Stanislaus Street 2‐Way CLAY STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way Clay Street/VAN BUREN STREET 2‐Way Cleveland Street/COMMERCE STREET 2‐Way CLEVELAND STREET/Hunter street 2‐Way CLEVELAND STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way CLOWES COURT/Clowes Street 2‐Way 2‐Way
CODY WAY/Colt Drive 1‐Way COLORADO AVENUE/FLINT AVENUE 4‐Way COLORADO AVENUE/LEVER BOLEVARD 3‐Way Columbia Avenue/LUCERNE AVENUE 2‐Way Columbia Avenue/POPLAR STREET 2‐Way
COLUMBIA AVENUE/Willow Street 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Delhi Street 2‐Way Commerce Street/DOWNS STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/ELM STREET 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/ESSEX STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/EUCLID AVENUE 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Flora Street 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/FULTON STREET 4‐Way COMMERCE STREET/HAZELTON AVENUE 4‐Way Commerce Street/JACKSON STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/JEFFERSON STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/KNOLES WAY 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Magnolia Street 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Maple Street 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Mariposa Avenue 2‐Way Commerce Street/McKENZIE STREET 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Mendocino Avenue 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Mosswood Avenue 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Ninth Street 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1729
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 Commerce Street/PINE STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/POPLAR STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/ROSE STREET 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Seventh Street 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Sixth Street 2‐Way Commerce Street/SONOMA AVENUE 2‐Way Commerce Street/STADIUM DRIVE 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Vine Street 2‐Way COMMERCE STREET/Walnut Street 2‐Way Commerce Street/WILLOW STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/WORTH STREET 2‐Way Commerce Street/WYANDOTTE STREET 2‐Way CORONADO AVENUE/FULTON STREET 3‐Way Country Club Boulevard/ORANGE STREET 2‐Way COURT STREET/HAZELTON AVENUE 4‐Way Court Street/SCOTTS AVENUE 2‐Way CRAFTON WAY/North Tuxedo Avenue 1‐Way CUMBERLAND PLACE/SWAIN ROAD 4‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1730
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: D
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
D STREET/EIGHTH STREET 4‐Way D STREET/Flora Street 2‐Way D STREET/Lafayette Street 2‐Way D Street/MYRTLE STREET 2‐Way D Street/OAK STREET 2‐Way D Street/WASHINGTON STREET 2‐Way DA VINCI DRIVE/GRAND CANAL BOULEVARD 4‐Way DAVE BRUBECK WAY/KENSINGTON WAY 3‐Way
Delhi Street/HARRISON STREET 2‐Way DELHI STREET/Lincoln Street 2‐Way DELLA STREET/HAZELTON AVENUE 4‐Way DELLA STREET/Market Street 2‐Way Della Street/SONORA STREET 2‐Way Della Street/WASHINGTON STREET 2‐Way DIANA MARIE DRIVE/Greenoch Way ‐ Jill Circle 2‐Way
DON AVENUE/LUCILLE AVENUE 4‐Way Douglas Road/PACIFIC AVENUE FNTG. ROAD 2‐Way DUNBARTON WAY/Glencannon Street 2‐Way DUNMAR AVENUE/Longview Avenue 1‐Way Dunmar Avenue/MAYFAIR AVENUE 1‐Way DWIGHT WAY/North Central Avenue 1‐Way DWIGHT WAY/North Tuxedo Avenue 2 Way DWIGHT WAY/South Central Avenue 1‐Way DWIGHT WAY/Stadium Drive 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1731
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: E
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
E STREET/FLORA STREET 4‐Way
E STREET/LAFAYETTE STREET 4‐Way
E STREET/MARKET STREET 4‐Way
E STREET/MINER AVENUE 4‐Way
E Street/OAK STREET 2‐Way
E Street/POPLAR STREET 2‐Way
Edan Avenue/INGLEWOOD AVENUE 2‐Way
Edgefield Way/MARSEILLE WAY 2‐Way
Edison Street/FLORA STREET 2‐Way
EDISON STREET/Magnolia Street 2‐Way
EDISON STREET/Poplar Street 2‐Way
Edison Street/ROSE STREET 2‐Way
EDISON STREET/Vine Street 2‐Way
Edison Street/WALNUT STREET 2‐Way
Edison Street/WILLOW STREET 2‐Way
EIGHTH STREET/Houston Avenue 1‐Way
EIGHTH STREET/LINCOLN STREET 4-Way
EIGHTH STREET/MADISON STREET 4‐Way
EIGHTH STREET/NIGHTINGALE AVENUE 4‐Way
EIGHTH STREET/POCK LANE 4‐Way
El Dorado Street Frontage Road/LORETTA AVENUE 3‐Way EL DORADO STREET/MORADA LANE 4‐Way
Elaine Drive/HOLIDAY DRIVE 1‐Way
Elaine Drive/KERMIT LANE 2‐Way
ELEVENTH STREET/TIFFANY STREET 4‐Way
Ellis Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way
ELLIS STREET/San Joaquin Street 2‐Way
ELLIS STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way
ELM STREET/San Jose Street 2‐Way
Elmwood Avenue/MANCHESTER AVENUE 2‐Way
Enterprise Street/POSTAL AVENUE 1‐Way
Erie Drive/PEESKILL DRIVE 2‐Way
ERIE DRIVE/TAM O'SHANTER DRIVE 3‐Way
ERMA AVENUE/Inglewood Avenue 2‐Way
ESTATE DRIVE/NORTHSTAR DRIVE 4‐Way
ESTATE DRIVE/OTTO DRIVE 4‐Way
ESTATE DRIVE/STANFIELD DRIVE 4‐Way
ESTATE DRIVE/TREETOP DRIVE 4‐Way
EUCLID AVENUE/Grange Avenue 2‐Way
Euclid Avenue/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way
EUCLID AVENUE/San Joaquin Street 2‐Way
EUGENIA STREET/Lafayette Street 1‐Way
EXHIBIT 1 1732
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 Eugenia Street/MILTON STREET 2‐Way EUGENIA STREET/Washington Street 2‐Way EUGENIA STREET/Worth Street 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1733
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: F
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
F Street/FINLAND AVENUE 2‐Way F STREET/FLORA STREET 4‐Way F STREET/Lafayette Street 2‐Way F Street/LINDSAY STREET 2‐Way F Street/MYRTLE STREET 2‐Way F Street/OAK STREET 2‐Way F STREET/Park Street 2‐Way F STREET/Poplar Street 2‐Way F Street/SONORA STREET 2‐Way F Street/WASHINGTON STREET 2‐Way FAIRMONT AVENUE/Horton Avenue 2‐Way FEATHER RIVER DRIVE/BROOKSIDE ROAD 3‐Way
FEATHER RIVER DRIVE/DRIFTWOOD PLACE 3‐Way Fifth Street/GRANT STREET 2‐Way FIFTH STREET/Hunter Street 2‐Way FIFTH STREET/STOCKTON STREET 3‐Way FIFTH STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way FIGUEROA STREET/Lucerne Avenue 1‐Way FILBERT STREET/MINER AVENUE 4‐Way
FIRST STREET/Grant Street 2‐Way FIRST STREET/Hunter Street 2‐Way FIRST STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way First Street/UNION STREET 2‐Way Five Mile Drive/SHILOH PLACE 2‐Way FLEETWOOD WAY/WACO WAY 4‐Way FLINT AVENUE/GEORGIA AVENUE 4‐Way FLORA AVENUE/Columbia Avenue 2‐Way Flora Street/GRATTAN AVENUE 1‐Way Flora Street/HARRISON STREET 2‐Way Flora Street/LAUREL STREET 1‐Way FLORA STREET/Lincoln Street 2‐Way FLORA STREET/Monroe Street 2‐Way Flora Street/ORANGE STREET 2‐Way FLORA STREET/Pilgrim Street 2‐Way Flora Street/SAN JOSE STREET 2‐Way
FLORA STREET/Sierra Nevada Street 2‐Way Flora Street/STOCKTON STREET 2‐Way FLORA STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way Flora Street/VAN BUREN STREET 2‐Way Flora Street/WATTS AVENUE 1‐Way Flora Street/WIZARD AVENUE 2‐Way Flora Street/YALE AVENUE 2‐Way
EXHIBIT 1 1734
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 FOURTH STREET/Grant Street 2‐Way Fourth Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way Fourth Street/STANISLAUS STREET 2‐Way Fourth Street/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way Fremont Street/GRANT STREET 2‐Way FREMONT STREET/Interstate 5 Ramps 2‐Way Fremont Street/PILGRIM STREET 2‐Way FREMONT STREET/Stanislaus Street 2‐Way FREMONT STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way FRENCH CAMP ROAD/Manthey Road 2‐Way French Camp Road FRENCH CAMP ROAD/MCDOUGALD BOULEVARD 2 3‐Way French Camp Turnpike/NINTH STREET 1‐Way FRESNO AVENUE/HOUSTON AVENUE 3‐Way
Fulton Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way Fulton Street/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 2‐Way FULTON STREET/SUTTER STREET 4‐Way FUNSTON AVENUE/Orwood Street 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1735
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: G
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
GADWALL CIRCLE/GROUSE RUN DRIVE 3‐Way GARFIELD STREET/Hazelton Avenue 2‐Way GEARY STREET/Sutter Street 1‐Way GEORGIA AVENUE/LEVER BOULEVARD 3‐Way GETTYSBURG PLACE/LINCOLN ROAD 3‐Way GETTYSBURG PLACE/PORTER AVENUE 4‐Way Glencannon Street/LAN ARK DRIVE 2‐Way GOLD BROOK DRIVE/Mercer Hill Way 1‐Way GOLDEN GATE AVENUE/Marsh Street 2‐Way GOSHEN DRIVE/GOTHAM DRIVE 3‐Way Goshen Drive/HUDSON DRIVE 2‐Way Grand Canal Boulevard/LORENZO LANE 2‐Way Grand Canal Boulevard/ROMANO DRIVE 1‐Way GRAND CANAL BOULEVARD/VENEZIA BOULEVARD 4‐Way GRANGE AVENUE/Mendocino Avenue 2‐Way GRANGE AVENUE/Michigan Avenue 2‐Way Grange Avenue/MONTEREY AVENUE 2‐Way GRANGE AVENUE/PRINCETON AVENUE 4‐Way Grange Avenue/SONOMA AVENUE 2‐Way Grange Avenue/TELEGRAPH AVENUE 2‐Way Grant Street/HEMLOCK STREET 2‐Way Grant Street/JACKSON STREET 2‐Way GRANT STREET/Jefferson Street 2‐Way Grant Street/LINDSAY STREET 2‐Way Grant Street/OSO STREET 2‐Way GRANT STREET/Second Street 2‐Way Grant Street/SONORA STREET 2‐Way Grant Street/THIRD STREET 2‐Way GRANT STREET/WEBER AVENUE 4‐Way
Grattan Avenue/OAK STREET 2‐Way GROUSE RUN DRIVE/QUAIL LAKES DRIVE 3‐Way GROVE STREET/Hunter Street 2‐Way Grove Street/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1736
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: H
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
HAMMERTOWN DRIVE/LORRAINE AVENUE 3‐Way HAMMERTOWN DRIVE/MONTAUBAN DRIVE 4‐Way
Hampton Street/HUNTER STREET 2‐Way HAMPTON STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way HARDING WAY/YALE AVENUE 4‐Way
Harrison Street/MAGNOLIA STREET 2‐Way Harrison Street/POPLAR STREET 2‐Way HARRISON STREET/Rose Street 2‐Way HARRISON STREET/Seventh Street 2‐Way Harrison Street/VINE STREET 2‐Way HARRISON STREET/Willow Street 2‐Way
HAZELTON AVENUE/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 4‐Way HEMET AVENUE/LORETTA AVENUE 4‐Way HENRY LONG BOULEVARD/Manthey Road 2‐Way HENRY LONG BOULEVARD/MCDOUGALD BOULEVARD 4‐Way HERNDON PLACE/Mill Springs Drive 2‐Way HILLVIEW AVENUE/RICHLAND WAY 4‐Way HILLVIEW AVENUE/Shoreham Place 2‐Way Holman Road/HORSETAIL DRIVE 2‐Way
HOMEWOOD DRIVE/Village Green Drive 2‐Way Horsetail Drive/WILD GRAPE DRIVE 2‐Way
HORTON AVENUE/Odell Avenue 2‐Way HOWARD STREET/LINCOLN STREET 4‐Way HUNTER STREET/Jackson Street 2‐Way
Hunter Street/JEFFERSON STREET 2‐Way HUNTER STREET/Knoles Way 2‐Way HUNTER STREET/MARKET STREET 3‐Way
HUNTER STREET/Mendocino Avenue 1‐Way Hunter Street/MONTEREY AVENUE 2‐Way Hunter Street/NOBLE STREET 2‐Way HUNTER STREET/OAK STREET 2‐Way HUNTER STREET/Pine Street 2‐Way HUNTER STREET/Second Street 2‐Way
HUNTER STREET/Sixth Street 2‐Way HUNTER STREET/Sonora Street 2‐Way Hunter Street/STADIUM DRIVE 2‐Way Hunter Street/THIRD STREET 2‐Way HUNTER STREET/WALNUT STREET 4‐Way HUNTER STREET/WORTH STREET 4‐Way
HUNTER STREET/WYANDOTTE STREET 4‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1737
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: I
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
INGLEWOOD AVENUE/LINCOLN ROAD 4‐Way INSPIRATION DRIVE/MARANATHA DRIVE 4‐Way Iris Avenue/KILTIE WAY ‐ NEW 2‐Way
IRON CANYON CIRCLE/MCAULIFFE ROAD 3‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1738
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: J
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
JACKSON STREET/Madison Street 2‐Way Jackson Street/MONROE STREET 2‐Way JACKSON STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way JACKSON STREET/Van Buren Street 2‐Way Jamestown Street/SHELLEY COURT 1‐Way JAMESTOWN STREET/Sousa Street 2‐Way JASMINE AVENUE/Rosewood Drive 1‐Way Jefferson Street/MADISON STREET 2‐Way JEFFERSON STREET/Monroe Street 2‐Way JEFFERSON STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way Jefferson Street/VAN BUREN STREET 2‐Way JEWELL COURT/San Juan Avenue 1‐Way JULIET ROAD/Madrid Drive 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1739
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: K
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
2‐Way
3‐Way
4‐Way
4‐Way
2‐Way
4‐Way
2‐Way
4‐Way
KATHLEEN DRIVE/Tommydon Street
KELLEY DRIVE/STANFIELD DRIVE
KELLEY DRIVE/VALLEY FORGE DRIVE
KENSINGTON WAY/MONTEREY AVENUE
Kensington Way/TUXEDO AVENUE
KERMIT LANE/LONGVIEW AVENUE
KINGSLEY AVENUE/Pixie Drive
KNICKERBOCKER DRIVE/TAM O'SHANTER DRIVE
KNOLES WAY/San Joaquin Street 2‐Way
EXHIBIT 1 1740
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: L
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
Lafayette Street/SIERRA NEVADA STREET 2‐Way LAUREL STREET/Marsh Street 2‐Way LAUREL STREET/Scotts Avenue 2‐Way LENOX PLACE/STANFIELD DRIVE 3‐Way Lincoln Street/MAGNOLIA STREET 2‐Way Lincoln Street/MOSSWOOD AVENUE 1‐Way LINCOLN STREET/Ninth Street 2‐Way Lincoln Street/POPLAR STREET 2‐Way Lincoln Street/ROSE STREET 2‐Way LINCOLN STREET/SIXTH STREET 4‐Way LINCOLN STREET/SONORA STREET 3‐Way
Lincoln Street/VINE STREET 2‐Way LINCOLN STREET/WEBER AVENUE 2‐Way
Lincoln Street/WILLOW STREET 2‐Way Lindsay Street/PILGRIM STREET 2‐Way LINDSAY STREET/Sierra Nevada Street 2‐Way LINDSAY STREET/STANISLAUS STREET 4‐Way Lindsay Street/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way Longview Avenue/MAYFAIR AVENUE 1‐Way
LORENZO LANE/ROSE MARIE LANE 4‐Way LORRAINE AVENUE/SWAIN ROAD 4‐Way
Lucerne Avenue/SAN JUAN AVENUE 2‐Way Lucerne Avenue/VICTORIA AVENUE 1‐Way Lucerne Avenue/YALE AVENUE 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1741
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: M
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
MacDuff Avenue/SANTA PAULA WAY 1‐Way MACON DRIVE/WATERBURY DRIVE/WHISTLER WAY 4‐Way
Madison Street/MARKET STREET 1‐Way MADISON STREET/Seventh Street 1‐Way Madison Street/SONORA STREET 1‐Way MADISON STREET/Worth Street 2‐Way MAGNOLIA STREET/Monroe Street 2‐Way Magnolia Street/ORANGE STREET 2‐Way Magnolia Street/SAN JOSE STREET 2‐Way MAGNOLIA STREET/Stockton Street 2‐Way Magnolia Street/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way Magnolia Street/VAN BUREN STREET 2‐Way MAJESTIC LANE/ROYAL OAKS DRIVE 3‐Way MANCHESTER AVENUE/Mendocino Avenue 1‐Way Manchester Avenue/MIDDLEFIELD AVENUE 2‐Way MANCHESTER AVENUE/MONTEREY AVENUE 4‐Way MARINE AVENUE/MICHIGAN AVENUE (City/County) 3‐Way
MARINERS DRIVE/STURGEON ROAD 3‐Way
MARIPOSA AVENUE/San Joaquin Street 2‐Way Mariposa Avenue/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way Mary Avenue/WAIT AVENUE 2‐Way McDONNEL AVENUE/Scotts Avenue 2‐Way McGAW STREET/ROSE MARIE LANE 4‐Way MEADOW AVENUE/ROSEWOOD DRIVE 4‐Way Mendocino Avenue/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 2‐Way MENDOCINO AVENUE/Sutter Street 2‐Way MERCER HILL WAY/Middlebury Way 1‐Way
Michaelangelo Drive/MICHAELANGELO DRIVE N/B 2‐Way MICHIGAN AVENUE/MISSION ROAD 4‐Way MICHIGAN AVENUE/RYDE AVENUE (City/County) 3‐Way
MIDDLEFIELD AVENUE/Orange Street 2‐Way Middlefield Avenue/SAN JOSE STREET 2‐Way MIDDLEFIELD AVENUE/Stockton Street 1‐Way Middlefield Avenue/YOSEMITE STREET 2‐Way Mill Springs Drive/SHILOH PLACE 2‐Way MISSION PARK/San Antonio Drive 2‐Way MISSION ROAD/TELEGRAPH AVENUE (City/County) 3‐Way
MOKELUMNE CIRCLE/SCOTT CREEK DRIVE (West) 4‐Way
MONROE STREET/Mosswood Avenue 2‐Way MONROE STREET/Poplar Street 2‐Way MONROE STREET/Rose Street 2‐Way MONROE STREET/Seventh Street 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1742
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 Monroe Street/VINE STREET 2‐Way MONROE STREET/Willow Street 2‐Way Monroe Street/WORTH STREET 2‐Way Monterey Avenue/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 2‐Way MONTE DIABLO AVENUE/SAN JUAN AVENUE 4‐Way
MONTEREY AVENUE/Sutter Street 2‐Way MONTICELLO DRIVE/Yarmouth Drive 1‐Way MORADA LANE/MORADA COURT C 3‐Way MORGAN PLACE/SWAIN ROAD 4‐Way
Mosswood Avenue/VAN BUREN STREET 1‐Way MOTOR MOVIE ACCESS ROAD/West Lane Frontage Road 1‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1743
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: N
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
Navy Drive/PERSHING AVENUE 1‐Way NINTH STREET/Phelps Street 2‐Way NINTH STREET/Pock Lane 1‐Way Noble Street/SAN JOAQUIN STREET 2‐Way NOBLE STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1744
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: O
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
Orange Street/POPLAR STREET 2‐Way ORANGE STREET/Vernal Way 2‐Way Orange Street/VINE STREET 2‐Way ORANGE STREET/Willow Street 2‐Way OTTO DRIVE/RAMSEY WAY 3‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1745
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: P
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
Park Street/SIERRA NEVADA STREET 2‐Way PHELPS STREET/Seventh Street 2‐Way Pilgrim Street/PINCHOT STREET 2‐Way PILGRIM STREET/Poplar Street 2‐Way PILGRIM STREET/Roosevelt Street 2‐Way PILGRIM STREET/Scotts Avenue 2‐Way Pilgrim Street/SONORA STREET 2‐Way PINCHOT STREET/Sierra Nevada Street 2‐Way PLYMOUTH ROAD/SWAIN ROAD 4‐Way
Pine Street/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way POCK LANE/TOGNINALI LANE 4‐Way
PONCE DE LEON AVENUE/San Pasqual Way 1‐Way PONCE DE LEON AVENUE/STONEWOOD DRIVE 4‐Way POPLAR STREET/San Jose Street 2‐Way Poplar Street/SIERRA NEVADA STREET 2‐Way Poplar Street/SOLARI AVENUE 2‐Way POPLAR STREET/Stockton Street 2‐Way POPLAR STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way POPLAR STREET/Van Buren Street 2‐Way POPLAR STREET.YALE AVENUE 4‐Way
POPLAR STREET/YOSEMITE STREET 4‐Way PROSPECTOR DRIVE/TAM O'SHANTER DRIVE 4‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1746
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: Q
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
QUAIL LAKES DRIVE/ROUND VALLEY CIRCLE 3‐Way QUANTAS LANE/TRANSWORLD DRIVE 4‐Way
EXHIBIT 1 1747
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: R
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
RALEIGH DRIVE/Saratoga Way 2‐Way RAYMOND AVENUE/Wilshire Avenue 2‐Way Riccardo Drive/ZACCARIA WAY 2‐Way
RIDDLE COURT/San Juan Avenue 1‐Way RIVER BLUFF LANE/WHISTLER WAY 3‐Way
RIVERTON WAY/Shiloh Place 1‐Way ROBINHOOD DRIVE/HOLIDAY DRIVE 4‐Way
Roosevelt Street/SIERRA NEVADA STREET 2‐Way ROOSEVELT STREET/Union Street 2‐Way Rose Street/SAN JOSE STREET 2‐Way ROSE STREET/San Juan Avenue 2‐Way Rose Street/STOCKTON STREET 2‐Way ROSE STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way Rose Street/VAN BUREN STREET 1‐Way
ROYAL OAKS DRIVE/ROYAL PARK LANE 3‐Way
EXHIBIT 1 1748
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: S
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
SAN JOAQUIN STREET/Stadium Drive 2‐Way
SAN JOAQUIN STREET/VINE STREET 4‐Way
SAN JOAQUIN STREET/WALNUT STREET 4‐Way
San Jose Street/VERNAL WAY 2‐Way SAN JOASE STREET/Vine Street 2‐Way
SAN JOSE STREET/Willow Street 2‐Way San Juan Avenue/WILLOW STREET 2‐Way SANDALWOOD DRIVE/WEST LANE FRONTAGE ROAD 3‐Way Saratoga Way/WINCHESTER COURT 2‐Way
SCHOOL STREET/Walnut Street 2‐Way Scotts Avenue/SEARCHLIGHT AVENUE 2‐Way
SCOTTS AVENUE/Sharon Avenue 2‐Way Scotts Avenue/SIERRA NEVADA STREET 1‐Way
SECOND STREET/Stanislaus Street 2‐Way Second Street/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way SECOND STREET / Union Street 1‐Way
SHARON AVENUE/Taylor Street 2‐Way Shiloh Place/SUMPTER QUAY CIRCLE (North 1‐Way
Shiloh Place/SUMPTER QUAY CIRCLE (South 1‐Way
Sierra Nevada Street/SONORA STREET 2‐Way
SIERRA NEVADA STREET/Walnut Street 2‐Way SIERRA NEVADA STREET/Washington Stre 2‐Way
Sixth Street/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way Sonoma Avenue/SUTTER STREET 2‐Way SONORA STREET/Stanislaus Street 2‐Way SONORA STREET/Sutter Street 2‐Way SONORA STREET/Union Street 2‐Way South Country Club Boulevard/YOSEMITE STREET 2‐Way
STANISLAUS STREET/Third Street 2‐Way Stanislaus Street/WORTH STREET 2‐Way Stockton Street/VINE STREET 2‐Way STOCKTON STREET/Willow Street 2‐Way SUMAC AVENUE/WESTLAND AVENUE 4‐Way SUTHERLAND DRIVE/WEST LANE WEST FRONTAGE RD 3‐Way
Sutter Street/THIRD STREET 2‐Way SUTTER STREET/Vine Street 1‐Way SUTTER STREET/WASHINGTON STREET 3‐Way Sutter Street/WORTH STREET 2‐Way SUTTER STREET/Wyandotte Street 2‐Way SWAIN ROAD/Village Green Drive 1‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1749
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: U
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
Union Street/WASHINGTON STREET 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1750
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: V
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
VAN BUREN STREET/Vine Street 2‐Way Van Buren Street/WILLOW STREET 2‐Way VAN BUREN STREET/Worth Street 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1751
DRAFT STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION SCHEDULE AMENDED 2023 SECTION: W
INTERSECTION
NO. OF
LEGS
Walnut Street/WOOD LANE 2‐Way WASHINGTON EXTENSION E/B ONLY/WEBER AVENUE 2‐Way
WEST LANE EAST FRONTAGE ROAD/WEST LANE FRONTAGE ROAD 4‐Way WEST LANE EAST FRONTAGE ROAD/Westmora Avenue 3‐Way WILLOW STREET/Yale Avenue 2‐Way EXHIBIT 1 1752
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0561, Version: 1
APPROVE PURCHASE OF 190 BOSCH IP CAMERAS AND WIRELESS EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a motion to purchase 190 Bosch IP cameras and hardware from AZCO Supply, Inc. of Stockton, CA, in the total amount of $670,358.72.
It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.
Summary
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) aimed to aid public health and economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. The City of Stockton was one of the many recipients of this emergency funding which was budgeted for multiple projects to address many concerns caused by the COVID19 pandemic. The Digital Traffic Camera Replacement project allows the Public Works and Police Departments to improve traffic flow and security within the city while promoting better air quality.
The Digital Traffic Camera Replacement, Project No. WARP506, was approved by Council on September 14, 2021, by Motion No. 2021-09-14-1501. This project will provide necessary upgrades to the City’s Video Management System which is monitored by the Stockton Police and Public Works Departments. Public Works monitors cameras at signalized intersections to maintain efficient flow of traffic. Cameras have also been installed for the Police Department in strategic locations for monitoring safety and security. Currently, the city has 377 cameras at locations citywide. 68 of the 377 cameras have been upgraded to newer digital camera technology. Public Works’ staff has identified an additional 190 cameras throughout the city that need upgrading to high-definition IPbased digital cameras.
On March 21, 2023, the City requested bids for the purchase of 190 Bosch IP cameras, wireless equipment, and accessories. On April 27, 2023, four bids were received. AZCO Supply, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive bid. The recommended motion authorizes the purchase of 190 Bosch IP cameras and wireless equipment from AZCO Supply, Inc. in the total amount of $670,358.72.
DISCUSSION
Background
The latest federal stimulus bill also known as the ARPA was signed to aid public health and economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. This bill was signed on March 11, 2021, which awarded a total of $350 billion in emergency funding for state, local, territorial, and tribal governments across the City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1753
File #: 23-0561, Version: 1
nation. The City of Stockton was one of the many recipients of this emergency funding which was budgeted for multiple projects to address many concerns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Digital Traffic Camera Replacement project allows the Public Works and the Police Departments to improve traffic flow and security within the city while promoting better air quality.
The Digital Traffic Camera Replacement, Project No. WARP506, was approved by Council on September 14, 2021, by Motion No. 2021-09-14-1501. This project will provide necessary upgrades to the City’s Traffic Video Management System which includes traffic cameras and servers, together with other system hardware components. Public Works has used cameras at signalized intersections to monitor traffic since the mid-1990’s. Live traffic monitoring allows the City to remotely diagnose field conditions and adjust timing of signals to improve traffic flows. Since 2003, cameras have also been installed for the Police Department in strategic locations for monitoring safety and security. This included the installation of cameras in parks, community centers, and neighborhood “hot spots” using wireless camera technology. The City continues to expand the camera system with various roadway improvements, City building projects, and development projects. Currently, the City’s existing security and traffic video monitoring system includes 377 cameras at locations citywide and is used by both the Police and Public Works Departments to monitor traffic, safety, and security.
Many of the existing cameras are obsolete and require constant repair and maintenance. 68 of the 377 cameras have been upgraded to newer digital camera technology. Public Works’ staff has identified an additional 190 cameras throughout the city that need upgrading to high-definition IPbased digital cameras. The remaining cameras will be upgraded with future CIP projects. Staff initiated the procurement process for 190 camera upgrades that will be funded with ARPA funding.
Installation of the cameras will be completed by a separate contract.
Present Situation
A Request for Bids for the purchase of 190 Bosch IP cameras and hardware was published on Bid Flash on March 21, 2023.
On April 20, 2023, four bids were received with the following results:
COMPANY NAME BID AMOUNT ADJUSTED BID AMOUNT
(including all taxes and fees) (local preference applied) AZCO Supply, Inc. $670,358.72 $656,951.54
(Stockton, CA)
Ojo Technology, Inc. $671,028.35 $657,607.78
(Stockton, CA)
AM Signal, LLC $740,086.02 $740,086.02
(Littleton, CO)
TR Communications $770,773.14 $770,773.14
(Sacramento, CA)
City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1754
File #: 23-0561, Version: 1
Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.090 gives a five percent bid preference to businesses located within the City of Stockton, and a two percent bid preference to businesses located within San Joaquin County. Application of the Local Business Preference has no effect on the bid order. Both AZCO Supply, Inc. and Ojo Technology, Inc. are located in San Joaquin County immediately outside of the city limits. Therefore, a two percent bid preference was given.
The bid from AZCO Supply, Inc. meets the bid specifications. It is recommended that Council approve a motion authorizing the purchase of 190 Bosch IP cameras and wireless equipment from AZCO Supply, Inc. in the total amount of $670,358.72 (Attachment A). Installation of the cameras will be completed by a separate contract.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There are sufficient funds available in Digital Traffic Camera Replacement, Project No. WARP506, Account No. 0010-156-800007-280-282-30-00-000-000, for the purchase of 190 Bosch IP cameras and wireless equipment from AZCO Supply, Inc. in the total amount of $670,358.72.
There is no impact to the City’s General Fund or any other unrestricted fund as a result of taking the recommended action.
Attachment A - AZCO Supply, Inc. Bid
City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1755
ATTACHMENT A 1756
ATTACHMENT A 1757
ATTACHMENT A 1758
ATTACHMENT A 1759
ATTACHMENT A 1760
ATTACHMENT A 1761
ATTACHMENT A 1762
ATTACHMENT A 1763
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0612, Version: 1
APPROVE MOTION TO AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE CESAR
CHAVEZ LIBRARY REMODEL
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a motion to:
1. Award a Professional Services Contract to Architectural Nexus, Inc. of Sacramento, CA, in the amount of $2,145,995, for design of the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No.
CL22001.
2. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.
It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.
Summary
The Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No. CL22001 will include redesign of the interior public spaces, hazardous materials assessment/abatement, refinish/replace all floor surfaces, paint interior of building, build out administrative offices on second floor, update electrical and mechanical systems, install new elevators, replace ceiling tiles and create new meeting spaces, and other components necessary to complete a modern library. The project was included in the 2018-2023 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
On November 18, 2021, the City advertised a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design of the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No. CL22001. On December 16, 2021, eight firms submitted proposals for this project. The Selection Committee evaluated the proposals and found Architectural Nexus, Inc. of Sacramento, CA, to be the most qualified and highest-ranked firm.
On March 22, 2022, Council authorized Motion 2022-03-22-1209 for submission of a grant application to the California State Library’s Building Forward Library Infrastructure (BFLI) Program in the amount of $10,000,000 to fund life-safety and critical maintenance items included in the scope of the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel. The City was awarded the $10,000,000 in September 2022, followed by Council accepting the awarded grant funds with Resolution 2023-02-07-1208.
It is recommended that Council approve a motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $2,145,995 with Architectural Nexus, Inc. It is anticipated that the final design documents will be completed by fall 2024.
City of Stockton Page 1 of 4 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1764
File #: 23-0612, Version: 1
DISCUSSION
Background
The Stockton-San Joaquin County Public Library System (Library) provides free library services at 16 library branches to 781,600 residents in San Joaquin County. The Cesar Chavez Central Library (Chavez Library), located at 650 North El Dorado Street, is a 70,000-square-foot facility first opened in 1964 and was partially remodeled in 2004 (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). Chavez Library serves as the Central Library, or “hub” of the library system, housing a central library book collection, special historical collections, the Community Services Administration Department, technical services, and delivery staff who support library operations.
The Chavez Library building is outdated, with years of deferred maintenance that has affected the practical use of the facility. In addition, any modifications to the building have historically been hindered due to the presence of hazardous materials, fireproofing, and non-standard building, mechanical, and electrical systems of the building. Updating the Chavez Library with more modern improvements and/or systems is needed to better accommodate patron needs.
On November 8, 2016, the Measure M - Strong Communities ballot initiative was passed, resulting in a one-quarter cent transaction and use tax dedicated to City of Stockton recreation and library programs, services, and facilities. A long-range expenditure plan was created and prioritized the renovation of the Cesar Chavez Library.
On November 18, 2021, the City advertised an RFP for design of the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No. CL22001. However, the RFP process was delayed to enable staff to pursue additional grant funding. In the fall of 2021, the California State Library announced the FY 2021-22 BFLI Grant funded by the State of California and administered by the California State Library. The grant is intended to address building life-safety and critical maintenance needs, including the replacement of the heating, ventilation, air conditioning system, electrical system, fire alarm system, plumbing, hazardous materials abatement, interior partitions, floor finishes, doors, and Americans with Disabilities Act compliance. The grant also funds design, permitting, and other administrative costs.
On March 22, 2022, Council authorized Motion No. 2022-03-22-1209 for the submission of a grant application to the California State Library. In September 2022, the City was awarded the $10,000,000 BFLI Grant, which Council accepted with Resolution No. 2023-02-07-1208.
The scope of work for the State and local funded Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No.
CL22001 will include redesign of the interior public spaces, hazardous materials assessment/abatement, refinish/replace all floor surfaces, paint interior of building, build out administrative offices on second floor, update electrical and mechanical systems, install new elevators, replace ceiling tiles, renovate and create new meeting spaces, and all other components necessary to complete a modern library. The project was included in the 2018-2023 Five-Year CIP.
Present Situation
City of Stockton Page 2 of 4 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1765
File #: 23-0612, Version: 1
On November 18, 2021, the City advertised an RFP for design of the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No. CL22001. On December 16, 2021, eight proposals were received from the following firms:
· Architectural Nexus, Inc. (Sacramento, CA)
· Jayson Architecture (San Francisco, CA)
· Noll & Tam Architects (Berkeley, CA)
· Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA) · LDA Partners, Inc. (Stockton, CA)
· Gutierrez/Associates (Oakland, CA)
· HMR Architects, Inc. (Sacramento, CA)
· WMB Architects, Inc. (Stockton, CA)
The Selection Committee, comprised of Public Works and Community Services Department staff, evaluated and ranked all proposals based on each firm’s understanding of work, experience with similar kinds of projects, staff qualifications and technical ability, project approach, cost proposal, and local firm participation.
Architectural Nexus, Inc. received the highest ranking based on the noted criteria and was determined to be the most qualified firm for this project. Staff negotiated a fee of $2,145,995 with Architectural Nexus, Inc. for design services. This fee is approximately 11 percent of the total estimated project cost, which is reasonable for a project of this size and complexity. It is anticipated that the final design documents will be completed by the end of 2024, with construction taking approximately 24 months to complete.
Staff recommends Council approve a motion to award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $2,145,995 to Architectural Nexus, Inc. for design services of the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No. CL22001.
Findings
Pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) section 3.68.070, Council may approve findings which support an exception to the competitive bidding process. These findings include:
1. The City does not have sufficient staff available to complete design documents for this project.
2. The scope of work requires an architectural/engineering firm experienced in preparing design documents for a facility remodel of this age and size.
3. Use of the RFP process is appropriate for this Professional Services Contract because it relies on the evaluation of professional qualifications and performance as the basis for selection of a vendor. Use of the criteria helps ensure selection of a vendor that will provide the highest quality professional service, which is in the public interest.
4. The City negotiated a contract following solicitation of competitive proposals in accordance with SMC section 3.68.070.A.3.
City of Stockton Page 3 of 4 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1766
File #: 23-0612, Version: 1
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There are sufficient funds available in the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel, Project No. CL22001, to award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $2,145,995 to Architectural Nexus, Inc. for the project.
There is no impact to the City’s General Fund or any other unrestricted fund as a result of taking the recommended action.
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Attachment B - Professional Services Contract with Architectural Nexus, Inc.
City of Stockton Page 4 of 4 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1767
ATTACHMENT A 1768
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is entered into this day of 2022, between the CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal corporation (“City”), and ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC., whose address is 930 R STREET, SACRAMENTO, CA (“Consultant”) for the CESAR CHAVEZ LIBRARY REMODEL (PROJECT NO. CL22001), hereinafter referred to as "Project".
RECITALS
A. Consultant represents that it is licensed in the State of California and is qualified to provide the services proposed in the SCOPE OF WORK section of this Contract.
B. City finds it necessary and advisable to use the services of the Consultant for the purposes provided in this Contract.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions in this Contract, City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall undertake and complete the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A and compatible with the standards of the profession. Consultant agrees that it shall produce a fully complete project that is acceptable to the City.
2. COMPENSATION. City shall pay Consultant for services outlined in Exhibit A according to the fee not to exceed the schedule detailed in Exhibit B, which is attached to this Contract and incorporated by this reference. Consultant agrees this fee is for full remuneration for performing all services and furnishing all staffing and materials called for in the scope of services. The payments shall be made on a monthly basis upon receipt and approval of Consultant’s invoice. Total compensation for services and reimbursement for costs shall not exceed $2,145,995.00 or as otherwise mutually agreed to in a Contract Amendment.
3. INSURANCE. During the term of this Contract, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect at its own cost and expense the insurance coverage as set forth in the attached Exhibit C and shall otherwise comply with the other provisions of Exhibit C.
4. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS. With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification by Consultant to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, Consultant shall
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims and causes of action which result in liabilities, judgments, awards, losses, damages, expenses, and costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert and consultant fees, and other expenses of litigation) including, but not limited to, death or injury to persons, or damage to property, which arise out of any violation of federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent damages are caused by the Consultant’s negligent services provided under this Agreement, or are in any way caused by the negligent performance of work by the Consultant or Consultant’s officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors. Consultant shall not be obligated to indemnify or defend City for claims finally determined by a court of law or arbitrator to arise from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. It is the intent of the Parties that this indemnity obligation is at least as broad as is permitted under California law. To the extent California Civil Code sections 2782, et seq., limit the defense or indemnity obligations of Consultant to City, the intent hereunder is to provide the maximum defense and indemnity obligations allowed by Consultant under the law. The indemnity set forth in this section shall not be limited by insurance requirements or by any other provision of this Agreement.
With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification by Consultant to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, and in addition to the other indemnity obligations in this Agreement, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against claims, losses, expenses, and costs including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of any claim brought against the City by an employee of Consultant, regardless of whether such claim may be covered by any applicable workers compensation insurance.
Consultant’s indemnification obligation is not limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable by or for the Consultant under workers’ compensation acts, disability acts, or other employee benefit acts.
5. SCHEDULE AND TERM. Consultant shall perform the scope of work as described in Exhibit A according to the schedule detailed in Exhibit D, which is attached to this Contract and incorporated by this reference. This Contract shall commence on the date written above and shall expire on August 31, 2027, unless extended by mutual agreement through the issuance of a Contract Amendment. a. Invoices submitted by Consultant to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time used, and include the City project number. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of approval of invoice by City. b. Upon completion of work and acceptance by City, Consultant shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which Consultant fails or neglects to
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after work is accepted by City.
6. CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE LAWS. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Consultant shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of services under this Contract on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.
a. TITLE VI
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” (42 USC Section 2000d).
http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titlevi.htm .
The City of Stockton requires compliance with the requirements of Title VI in all of its programs and activities regardless of funding source. b. DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT POLICY
The City of Stockton has a Discrimination and Harassment Policy (Exhibit E). The purpose of this policy is to reaffirm the City’s commitment to demonstrating respect for all individuals by strictly prohibiting discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment in the workplace, to define the types of behavior and conduct prohibited by this policy, and to set forth a procedure for reporting, investigating, and resolving complaints of discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
c. LABOR STANDARDS PROVISIONS/CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE
The bidder shall understand that conditions set forth in Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the California Labor Code shall be considered part of the contract
agreement. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xht ml?lawCode=LAB&division=2.&title=&part=7.&chapter=1.&article=2. d. PREVAILING WAGE RATES
Consultant and any subcontractor shall pay each employee engaged in the trade or occupation not less than the prevailing hourly wage rate. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 of the Labor Code, the Director of Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
determined the general prevailing rates of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, and subsistence pay as provided for in Section 1773.1, apprenticeship or other training programs authorized by Section 3093 and similar purposes applicable to the work to be done. Consultant performing the work under this contract shall obtain a copy of the wage rate determination and shall distribute copies to each subcontractor. As the wage determination for each craft reflects an expiration date, it shall be the prime Consultant and each subcontractor's responsibility to ensure that the prevailing wage rates of concern is current and paid to the employee.
i. The Consultant performing the work shall be responsible for obtaining a copy of the State wage rate determination. State wage rates may be obtained at
http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/pwd/Determinations/Northern/Northern.p df. The Consultant shall be responsible for posting said wage rates at a prominent location at the work site and shall maintain same in a good readable condition for the duration of the work.
ii. Should the Consultant choose to work on a Saturday, Sunday or on a holiday recognized by the Labor Unions, the Consultant shall reimburse the City the actual cost of engineering, inspection, superintendence, and or other overhead expenses which are directly chargeable to the contract. Should such work be undertaken at the request of the City, reimbursement will not be required. To conform strictly with the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, of the Labor Code of the State of California. To forfeit as a penalty to City the sum of TWENTY-FIVE AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($25.00) for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed by CONTRACTOR, or by any subcontractor under Consultant, in the execution of this contract, for each calendar day during which any laborer, worker, or mechanic is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours and who is not paid the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work in violation of the provisions of Sections 1770 to 1781 of the Labor Code of the State of California. That all sums forfeited under the provisions of the foregoing sections shall be deducted from the payments to be made under the terms of this contract. iii. PAYROLL RECORDS - The Consultant to whom the contract is awarded shall ensure that the prime and each subcontractor will, in accordance with Section 1776 of the Labor Code, maintain certified payroll records. A copy of said records shall be provided with each invoice to the Public Works Department, Attention: Contract Compliance Officer. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to obtain copies of the current prevailing wage rate determination for all
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
subcontractors. Additionally, certified payroll records must be uploaded to the DIR website as required by labor code.
iv. APPRENTICESHIP STANDARDS - The Consultant shall comply with the provisions established in Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code concerning the 1) certified approval by local joint apprenticeship committees for the employment and training of apprentices, and 2) contribution of funds to administer and conduct apprenticeship programs, if applicable to the job.
e. SANCTIONS
Deliverables must conform with all applicable federal, state, and local laws.
Such conformity includes compliance with federal sanctions, and Contractor certifies that it has not and will not engage in prohibited transactions with sanctioned persons or entities.
7. RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITY. City shall make available to Consultant all data and information in the possession of City which both parties deem necessary to complete the work, and City shall actively aid and assist Consultant in obtaining such information as may be deemed necessary from other agencies and individuals.
8. OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT. Throughout the term of this Contract, Consultant represents and warrants that it has or will have at the time this Contract is executed, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for the Consultant to practice its professions, and Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, keep in effect during the life of this Contract all such licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals. Consultant shall meet with the Public Works Director or other personnel of City or third parties as necessary on all matters connected with the carrying out of Consultant’s services. Such meetings shall be held at the request of either party hereto. Consultant further warrants that it will follow the best current, generally accepted and professional practices to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding this project.
9. OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All reports, drawings, designs, plan review comments, work product, and all other documents completed or partially completed by Consultant in the performance of this Contract shall become and remain the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Consultant agrees to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Contract. If any materials are lost, damaged, or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Consultant shall replace them at its own expense. Consultant shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Contract and shall not
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services unless the City expressly provides prior written consent.
10. CONTRACT AMENDMENTS. City reserves the right to make such alterations as may be deemed necessary or advisable and to require such extra work as may be required for the proper completion of the work contemplated by Consultant. Any such changes will be set forth in a Contract Amendment which will specify, in addition to the work done in connection with the change made, adjustment of contract time, if any, and the basis of compensation for such work. A Contract Amendment will not become effective until approved by the authorized City official.
11. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Contract at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Consultant. The Contract shall then be deemed terminated and no further work shall be performed by Consultant. If the Contract is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for that percentage of work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.
12. CONSULTANT STATUS. In performing the obligations set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall have the status of an independent contractor and Consultant shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Consultant are its agents and employees, and are not agents of the City. Subcontractors shall not be recognized as having any direct or contractual relationship with the City. The persons engaged in the work, including employees of subcontractors and suppliers, will be considered employees of Consultant.
The Consultant shall be responsible for the work of subcontractors, which shall be subject to the provisions of this Contract. The Consultant is responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and persons directly or indirectly employed by them. a. If in the performance of this Contract any third persons are employed by Consultant, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by Consultant.
i. It is further understood and agreed that Consultant must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Consultant’s personnel.
ii. As an independent contractor, Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against the City based upon any contention by any third party that employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
13. ASSIGNMENT. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Contract or any interest or obligation in the Contract without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Consultant shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.
14. HEADINGS NOT CONTROLLING. Headings used in the Contract are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Contract.
15. NOTICES. Any and all notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
To Consultant: Architectural Nexus, Inc. To City: Public Works Director 930 R Street City of Stockton
Sacramento, CA 95811 22 E. Weber Ave., Rm. 301
Stockton, CA 95202
16. LICENSES, CERTIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS. Prior to the City’s execution of this Contract and prior to the Consultant’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall obtain a City of Stockton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Contract. Consultant covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Contract.
17. RECORDS AND AUDITS. City reserves the right to periodically audit all charges made by Consultant to City for services under this Contract. Upon request, Consultant agrees to furnish City, or a designated representative, with necessary information and assistance.
Consultant agrees that City or its delegate shall have the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to performance of the Contract. Consultant agrees to provide City or its delegate with any relevant information requested, and shall permit City or its delegate access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purposes of determining compliance with this Contract. Consultant agrees to maintain such records for a period of three years from the date that final payment is made.
18. CONFIDENTIALITY. Consultant shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.
19. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Consultant covenants that other than this Contract, Consultant has no financial interest with any official, employee, or other representative of the City. Consultant and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services under this Contract. If such an interest arises, Consultant will immediately notify City.
20. WAIVER. In the event either City or Consultant at any time waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Contract, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition, or obligation.
21. GOVERNING LAW. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue for all claims in the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin, Stockton Branch or, where applicable, in the federal District Court of California, Eastern District, Sacramento Division.
22. NO PERSONAL LIABILITY. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount due Consultant.
23. INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION. The response by Consultant to the Request for Proposals and the Request for Proposals on file with the City Clerk are hereby incorporated herein by reference to the extent that such documents do not differ from the provisions and terms of this Contract that shall supersede such response to Request for Proposals. This Contract represents the entire integrated agreement between Consultant and City, supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral, between the parties, and may be amended only by written instrument signed by Consultant and City. All exhibits and this contract are intended to be construed as a single document. Should any inconsistency occur between the specific terms of this Contract and the attached exhibits, the terms of this Contract will prevail.
24. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Contract are severable to the extent that should any of its provisions or terms be declared void in whole or in part by operation of law or agreement of the parties, the remainder of the provisions or terms not expressly declared void shall remain enforceable and in full effect.
25. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than City and Consultant.
26. AUTHORITY. The undersigned hereby represent and warrant that they are authorized by the parties to execute this Contract.
//
//
//
//
//
//
Professional Services Contract – ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC. – PROJECT NO. CL22001 (Updated 04/24/23)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF: the parties have executed this Contract the day and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF STOCKTON ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, INC.
By: By:
HARRY BLACK Signature
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
Print Name
BY:
ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC Title:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
AN EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Page 1 of 6
May 19, 2023
To: Ahbid Mohammad, P.E.
Associate Civil Engineer
City of Stockton, Public Works Department
Re: Fee Proposal – Cesar Chavez Library Remodel
City Project No. CL22001
Dear Ahbid,
It is our pleasure to work with the City of Stockton on this exciting project. As the city prepares to embark on this remodel project, we look forward to support this and many more endeavors and continue to develop our great working relationship.
As per our conversations and correspondence regarding the Cesar Chavez Library Remodel project, we are providing an updated fee proposal to the original proposal dated Dec 13, 2021. Since the initial proposal, we have had the opportunity to help the city process the California State Library Building Forward grant. It is our understanding that the grant ($10M + $5M matching funds) will be supplemented by additional city funds to support additional scope that transforms the existing space not just to provide repairs and upgrades, but redesign the space to the benefit of the community and staff. While the construction cost is undefined, we estimate additional funding would be in the order of $4.4M, for a total construction cost of $19.4M.
Remodel Scope
As we understand it, the scope of the remodel is as follows:
As per Priority List Grant Budget Alignment (dated 11/21/2022)
1. New Emergency Communication & Backup Power Supply
2. New Fire Alarm (layout only)
3. Asbestos Abatement & Demolition
4. New Passenger Elevator
5. New HVAC system
6. New Freight Elevator
7. New Electrical, Low Voltage, AV systems
8. Space Re-design
9. New Interior Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment
10. New Interior Signage & Graphics
11. New Loading Dock
12. New Plumbing as required for remodeled areas
13. New Ramp to Parking Lot & Staff Area
14. Security Fencing (base)
ARCHITECTURAL NEXUS, Inc
archnexus.com
SACRAMENTO
930 R Street
Sacramento, California 95811
T 916.443.5911
SALT LAKE CITY
2505 East Parleys Way
Salt Lake City, Utah 84109
T 801.924.5000
EXHIBIT A Page 10 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1778
AN EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Page 2 of 6
Baseline Scope of Services
We propose the following scope of services:
Task 1: Assessment Study & Programming
1. Review record drawings, visit site for field verification of existing conditions
2. Coordinate with users on project needs
3. Develop space use/ time analysis
4. Develop initial space list with project team
5. Create a Needs Assessment Study document for City review and comments
6. Develop background of existing floor plan & site plan
7. Review hazmat reports
8. Review elevator maintenance reports
9. Develop an adjacency diagram
10. Develop department bubble diagram
11. Furniture Fixtures & Equipment Programming
12. Lead (3) in-person user-group meetings to review programming, provide meeting minutes
13. Lead (3) virtual user-group meetings to review programming, provide meeting minutes
14. Develop 50% Programming cost estimate
15. Lead (2) 1-hour virtual project budget meetings to assign budget targets to scope buckets
16. Develop 100% Programming cost estimate
Task 2: Schematic Design
1. Develop backgrounds of existing conditions
2. Develop 3 concept floor plan options
3. Develop 3 concept site plan option for fencing, ramps, loading dock, garden
4. Develop concept elevations/ photorealistic renderings
5. Develop schematic design set for review and approval
6. Provide initial code analysis
7. Lead (4) 1-hour virtual weekly user-group meetings to review design concepts, provide meeting minutes
8. Prepare FF&E Data Sheets
9. Develop Furniture & Finishes Preliminary Concept
10. Develop 100%SD cost estimate
11. Lead (2) 1-hour virtual project budget meetings to refine budget targets to scope buckets
12. Develop initial energy model for curtain wall replacement, coordinate energy requirements
Task 3: Design Development
1. Develop 95% DD Drawings & Technical Specifications for stake-holder review
2. Lead (4) 1-hour virtual weekly user-group meetings to review design, room data sheets, details, basis of design specifications
3. Address & Respond to Review Comments
4. FF&E Preliminary Layout
5. Prepare (2) finish selection options for client review and approval
6. Prepare generic finish schedule for client approval
7. Update renderings
8. Prepare finishes rendering for client approval
9. Develop 100% DD cost estimate
10. Lead (2) 1-hour virtual project budget meetings
11. Provide basis of design for curtain wall (define pattern, glass, performance) EXHIBIT A Page 11 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1779
AN EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Page 3 of 6
Task 4: Construction Documents/ Permit
1. Develop 95% CD Drawings
2. Develop 95% CD Technical Specifications
3. Address & Respond to Review Comments
4. Provide 100% CD CAD Drawings (DWG) and Specifications (Word)
5. Attend (2) 1-hour virtual pre-submittal meetings for roundtable reviews & permit review officials to confirm design solutions
6. Submit Project Bldg Dept (Electronic Plan Check)
7. Address & Respond to Bldg Review Comments
8. Develop final finish schedule and legend
9. Develop final finish plan, reflected ceiling plan, millwork drawings, elevations
10. Curtain wall detailing & hardware specifications
Task 5: Bidding
1. Review city’s Request for Qualification document (RFQ) for general contractors
2. Assist city in reviewing general contractors’ qualifications
3. Assist in addressing contractor pre-bid questions
4. Attend bid-walk
5. Issue clarification addenda
Task 6: Construction Administration
1. Respond to contractor Requests for Information(RFI)
2. Issue Architect's Supplemental Instructions (ASI) as needed
3. Attend weekly construction progress (virtual) meetings for 24 months
4. Perform (16) periodic visits of site, provide observation reports
5. Perform (1) substantial completion punchwalk, provide list of deficiencies noted
6. Review construction submittals & shop drawings
7. Provide record drawings per contractor marked-up job copy of permit documents Task 7: Additive Alternate #1 – Multiple Bid Packages:
If project requires scope to be documented separately by fund-source, we propose the following:
1. Determine Funding-Phase I scope boundary for grant-funded scope
2. Determine Funding-Phase II scope boundary for city-funded scope
3. Coordinate scope with city, review grant funded portion with CSD
4. Submit two packages for plan review, respond separately
5. Review submittals and respond to RFIs for two sets of documents Task 8: Additive Alternate #2 – Public Outreach:
If public outreach is requested, we propose the following:
1. Lead (5) public meetings/ events
2. Provide Social Economic Environmental Design (SEED) certification
3. Develop public presentation & mailers
4. Develop public engagement activities
5. Provide presentation analysis
EXHIBIT A Page 12 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1780
AN EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Page 4 of 6
Project Team:
• Architectural Design: Arch Nexus
• Interior Design/ Furniture Fixtures & Equipment Design: Arch Nexus & MSS • Civil Engineering: KPFF
• Structural Engineering: KPFF
• Mechanical/Plumbing Engineering: Capital Engineering
• Electrical Engineering: EDGE Electrical
• Cost Estimating: Sierra West
Professional Service Fees:
We propose the lump sum fees below and bill our services on a monthly basis based on percentage of completion for each task.
Total Baseline Fees
Baseline Remodel
Arch Consultants Total
Task 1: Programming/ Study $124,305 $58,130 $182,435
Task 2: SD $160,270 $175,900 $336,170
Task 3: DD $239,620 $190,570 $430,190
Task 4: CD/Permit $310,935 $208,670 $519,605
Task 5: Bidding $41,290 $22,510 $63,800
Task 6: CA $298,020 $113,975 $411,995
$1,944,195
Add Alternates
Add Alts
Arch Consultants Total
Task 7: Add Alt #1 - Multiple Bid Packages $90,560 $43,600 $134,160 Task 8: Add Alt #2 - Public Outreach $67,640 $0 $67,640 Exclusions:
1. Construction swing space design
2. Full seismic analysis
3. Fire Sprinkler design (This will be a delegated design, however Fire Sprinkler Performance Criteria is included in this scope and fee)
4. Structural material testing program
5. Provisions for EV chargers
6. PV System
7. CCTV (see assumption 16)
8. Intercom system layout (see assumption 16)
9. Commissioning services
10. Building envelope/ roof upgrade
11. Street lighting
12. Value Engineering if requested after DD signoff
13. Access control system
14. CEQA categorical exemption, initial study, environmental checklist, negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report or any other environmental studies or reports.
Total with Alternates: $2,145,995
EXHIBIT B Page 13 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1781
AN EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Page 5 of 6
Assumptions:
1. Design team assumes a 24-month duration for bidding, construction, and closeout.
2. Since none of the improvements are considered major structural alterations and since there will not be a change in occupancy we do not anticipate a full seismic analysis will be required, only an analysis of existing wall anchorage to existing steel roof.
3. The plumbing systems and equipment including main vertical and horizontal piping is Code compliant and is of adequate capacity and type to serve the proposed remodel without significant modification, except as outlined in this proposal.
4. Fire Alarm system layout will be provisioned for a delegated design by fire alarm subcontractor awarded the project.
5. The existing electrical service is sufficient to accommodate remodel.
6. Existing electrical panels & switchgear are at end of useful life, new panels & switchgear to be included. Existing transformer is new and shall remain.
7. Owner shall provide electrical meter readings.
8. The owner shall have the ability or be responsible for hiring an electrical contractor to verify connections to devices, panels, equipment and/or feeder to panels for items that cannot be verified during site visit or if items conflict with record drawings. A list of items will be provided to owner after initial site visit.
9. Existing electrical panels with existing loads shall not be modified to comply with disaggregation of electrical loads per current Title 24 energy code. Only new loads shall be disaggregated.
10. We do not anticipate a SWPPP will be required as project will not exceed 1 acre of disturbed area.
11. We do not anticipate the proposed improvements will require modifications to the existing storm drain system or provide retention of stormwater runoff.
12. After preliminary code analysis, we believe the existing curtain wall system needs to be replaced in order to meet minimum energy code requirements. Additionally, the existing single-pane curtain walls are very inefficient; by replacing them the City’s operational costs will be dramatically reduced and the new HVAC system can be downsized. We propose the curtain wall to be a delegated design submittal for deferred approval, but we’ll provide the design criteria. We anticipate the existing structure will be utilized for the new curtain wall system.
13. City to provide the CEQA Categorical Exemption and any other environmental reports and studies if required
14. Access control system, equipment, and card readers will be designed and built by the general contractor. No design fees are included for layout or performance criteria.
15. Electrical engineer will provide power to elevator control panel. New dedicated circuits for receptacles and new lighting for elevator pit and machine rooms shall be provided to meet current requirements.
16. Direction will be provided to the contractor to coordinate with the city on removing, salvaging, and protection of existing CCTV and Intercom systems.
EXHIBIT B Page 14 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1782
Insurance Requirements for Professional Services
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Contractor has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (nonowned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(Not required if Contractor provides written verification it has no employees)
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. (If Claims-made, see below.)
It shall be a requirement under this agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any Insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. No EXHIBIT C Page 15 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1783
representation is made that the minimum insurance requirements of this agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this agreement.
Limits of Insurance
The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). Additional insured Name of Organization shall read “City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.” Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract.
Primary Coverage
The Additional Insured coverage under the Contractor’s policy shall be “primary and non-contributory” and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or selfinsurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor’s insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall state that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton.
EXHIBIT C Page 16 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1784
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City of Stockton a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Stockton by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Stockton has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Stockton for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors.
Self-Insured Retentions
All Self-insured retentions must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Stockton.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton.
Claims Made Policies (note – applicable only to professional liability) If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.
EXHIBIT C Page 17 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1785
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton Risk Services before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
Contractor shall, prior to the commencement of work under this Agreement, provide the City of Stockton with a copy of its declarations page(s) and endorsement page(s) for each of the required policies.
Subcontractors
Contractors shall require and verify that all subcontractors, or other parties hired for this work, purchase and maintain coverage for indemnity and insurance requirements as least as broad as specified in this agreement to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor’s work with the same certificate of insurance requirements and naming as additional insureds all parties to this contract. Contractor shall include the following language in their agreement with Subcontractors: “Subcontractors hired by Contractor agree to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City under the contract documents and provide a valid certificate of insurance and the required endorsements included in the agreement as proof of compliance prior to commencement of any work and to include this same requirement for any subcontractors they hire for this work. A copy of the owner contract document indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor upon request.” Contractor shall provide proof of such compliance and verification to the City upon request.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Certificate Holder Address
Proper address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:
City of Stockton Attn: City Risk Services
400 E Main Street, 3rd Floor – HR
Stockton, CA 95202
EXHIBIT C Page 18 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1786
Study
Programming/
Documents
Construction
Construction
65d
8.1.2023
11.1.2023 4.2.2024
Development
Design
60d 64d 64d
Permitting
7.1.2024
Bidding
10.1.2024
30d
11.12.2024
475d
10.1.2026
5.18.2023
Proposed Schedule
Cesar Chavez Library Remodel
City of Stockton
Design
Schematic
Outreach
Public
1.5.2024
42d
EXHIBIT D
ATTACHMENT B
1787
EXHIBIT E Page 20 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1788
EXHIBIT E Page 21 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1789
EXHIBIT E Page 22 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1790
EXHIBIT E Page 23 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1791
EXHIBIT E Page 24 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1792
EXHIBIT E Page 25 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1793
EXHIBIT E Page 26 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1794
EXHIBIT E Page 27 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1795
EXHIBIT E Page 28 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1796
EXHIBIT E Page 29 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1797
EXHIBIT E Page 30 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1798
EXHIBIT E Page 31 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1799
EXHIBIT E Page 32 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1800
EXHIBIT E Page 33 of 33 ATTACHMENT B 1801
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0613, Version: 1
ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE MAIN STREET COMPLETE
STREETS PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to appropriate funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Main Street Complete Streets, Project No. WT18006.
It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.
Summary
On November 5, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-11-05-1105, Council authorized the award of a Professional Services Contract, in the amount of $585,000, with Siegfried Engineering, Inc., of Stockton, CA, to prepare the Precise Road Plan (PRP) and environmental documentation for the Main Street Complete Streets project. The overall goal of the project is to provide a framework for Main Street to become a “complete street”. Complete streets are designed to accommodate all modes of transportation, including vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and mass transit.
The original limits of the Main Street Complete Streets project were from Aurora Street to the city limits near State Route 99. Contract Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 were administratively issued under the City Manager’s authority to expand the limits from California Street to the city limits near State Route 99, and Market Street from California Street to Main Street (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). These amendments were necessary to improve bicycle connectivity to the downtown area and to close a gap in the bicycle backbone network.
Staff recommends Council adopt a resolution to appropriate funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Main Street Complete Streets, Project No.
WT18006. The resolution will sufficiently fund all remaining costs to complete the PRP, including Planning Permit Fees, any additional consultant fees, and staff costs.
It is anticipated that the PRP and environmental documents will be completed by February 2024.
The completed PRP will then be used to acquire State and/or federal funding to implement the final design and construction of improvements identified in the PRP for subsequent phases of the project.
City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1802
File #: 23-0613, Version: 1
DISCUSSION
Background
On November 5, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-11-05-1105, Council authorized the award of a Professional Services Contract, in the amount of $585,000, with Siegfried Engineering, Inc., of Stockton, CA, to prepare the PRP and environmental documentation for the Main Street Complete Streets project. The corridor is identified as a primary east-west bicycle facility in the Bicycle Master Plan and has received interest from the community for revitalization efforts. The project scope included developing a PRP to determine the future configuration of this corridor. The overall goal of the project is to provide a framework for Main Street to become a “complete street”. Complete streets are designed to accommodate all modes of transportation, including vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and mass transit. The preparation of a PRP will enable staff to pursue future grant funding for implementation of the plan.
The original limits of the Main Street Complete Streets project were from Aurora Street to the City limits near State Route 99. Contract Amendment No. 1 was authorized by the City Manager on March 23, 2020, in the amount of $60,000, to incorporate Market Street from Aurora Street to Main Street in the PRP for the purpose of improving bicycle connectivity to the downtown area. Contract Amendment No. 2 was authorized by the City Manager on March 23, 2020, in the amount of $68,000, to extend the starting limits of Main and Market Streets to California Street to close a gap in the bicycle backbone network. The new limits of the PRP are as follows: Main Street from California Street to the city limits near State Route 99, and Market Street from California Street to Main Street (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). The PRP is 95% complete.
In June 2022, Public Works staff submitted State and regional applications for the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 6 grant program for the Main and Market Complete Streets (Phase 1) project. On February 23, 2023, the San Joaquin Council of Governments awarded $8,226,000 in regional ATP funds to design and construct Phase 1 of the project. The limits of Phase 1 will be on Main Street and Market Street from California Street to Sierra Nevada Street. Other phases that are unfunded could be from Sierra Nevada Street to D Street (Phase 2), and from D Street to the city limits near State Route 99 (Phase 3) on Main Street and Market Street. Completion of the PRP and environmental documentation are required before receiving design and construction grant funding allocation for Phase 1 from the California Transportation Commission.
Present Situation
Staff recommends Council adopt a resolution to appropriate funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Main Street Complete Streets, Project No.
WT18006. The resolution will sufficiently fund all remaining costs to complete the PRP. These costs include Planning Permit Fees for Community Development Department to review and approve the PRP and environmental documentation ($20,000), any additional consultant fees ($30,000), and project management staff costs ($50,000). It is anticipated that the PRP and environmental documents will be completed by February 2024. The completed PRP will then be used to acquire State and/or federal funding to implement the final design and construction of improvements identified in the PRP for subsequent phases of the project.
City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1803
File #: 23-0613, Version: 1
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Appropriate $100,000 from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Main Street Complete Streets, Project No. WT18006, Account No. 4570-714-800007-250-251-30-45-000-000. The resolution will sufficiently fund all remaining costs to successfully complete and approve the PRP and environmental documentation.
There is no impact to the City’s General Fund or any other unrestricted fund as a result of taking the recommended action.
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1804
1805
Resolution No.
STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE MAIN STREET COMPLETE STREETS, PROJECT NO. WT18006
On November 5, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-11-05-1105, Council authorized the award of a Professional Services Contract, in the amount of $585,000, to Siegfried Engineering, Inc., of Stockton, CA, to prepare a Precise Road Plan and environmental documentation for the Main Street Complete Streets, Project No. WT18006; and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 were administratively issued under the City Manager’s authority to expand the limits of Main Street and incorporate Market Street in the Precise Road Plan; and
Appropriation of funds is needed to fund all remaining costs to complete the Precise Road Plan, including Planning Permit Fees, any additional consultant fees, and staff costs; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council approves the appropriation of funds in the amount of $100,000 from the Measure K Maintenance fund balance to the Main Street Complete Streets, Project No. WT18006.
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED August 22, 2023 .
KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1806
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0616, Version: 1
ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT AND
APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE MARIPOSA ROAD PRECISE ROAD PLAN
RECOMMENDATION
1. Award a Professional Services Contract to Siegfried Engineering, Inc., of Stockton, CA, in the amount of $968,800, to prepare a Precise Road Plan and environmental documents for the Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan, Project No. WT23032.
2. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.
3. Appropriate funds in the amount of $150,000 from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan, Project No. WT23032.
It is recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.
Summary
Mariposa Road is beginning to experience development along the corridor, and a Precise Road Plan (PRP) is needed to define what the roadway should look like in future conditions. The Mariposa Road PRP is a planning study that will focus on Mariposa Road from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard/Charter Way to Austin Road (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). The project scope includes developing a PRP to determine the future configuration of this corridor. This PRP is needed to establish what Mariposa Road should be under new development growth as defined in the adopted 2040 General Plan. The project is identified as a priority in the recently approved Bicycle Master Plan and was included in the Five-Year 2022-27 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
On March 22, 2023, the City advertised a Request for Proposals (RFP) for preparation of a PRP and environmental documents for Mariposa Road. On May 3, 2023, two firms submitted proposals, and the Selection Committee found Siegfried Engineering, Inc., of Stockton, CA, to be the most qualified and highest-ranked firm.
Staff recommends that Council adopt a resolution to award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $968,800 to Siegfried Engineering, Inc. for preparation of a PRP and environmental documents.
Staff also recommends that Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to appropriate funds from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan.
City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1807
File #: 23-0616, Version: 1
DISCUSSION
Background
Mariposa Road is beginning to experience development along the corridor, and a PRP is needed to define what the roadway should look like in future conditions. The Mariposa Road PRP is a planning study that will focus on Mariposa Road from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/Charter Way to Austin Road (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). The project scope includes developing a PRP to determine the future configuration of this corridor. This PRP is needed to establish what Mariposa Road should be under new development growth as defined in the adopted 2040 General Plan. The project is identified as a priority in the recently approved Bicycle Master Plan and was included in the Five-Year 2022-27 CIP). This plan will ensure that the proper right-of-way can be dedicated as development occurs to allow for the roadway facility to conform with the adopted 2040 General Plan.
Currently, there are segments along Mariposa Road that are congested, lack bicycle lanes, have little to no frontage improvements, and are undergoing development. The purpose of the PRP is to develop a comprehensive plan for the corridor that outlines roadway alignment, lane configurations, access restrictions, and intersection controls consistent with the Adopted 2040 General Plan. It will establish Mariposa Road as a “Complete Street” that emphasizes and promotes pedestrian, bicycle, and multimodal transportation along Mariposa Road from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard / Charter Way to Austin Road (Attachment A - Vicinity Map). In addition, the PRP will also focus on addressing the logistical uses along the corridor, which has become more prevalent.
The preparation of a PRP will enable staff to better coordinate with development along the corridor and pursue any potential grant funding for implementation portions of eligible PRP improvements.
The project will also prepare the necessary environmental documents required under the California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Protection Act guidelines. The project was included in the 2022-27 Five-Year CIP.
Present Situation
On March 22, 2023, the City advertised an RFP for preparation of a PRP and environmental documents for Mariposa Road. On May 3, 2023, two proposals were received from the following firms:
· Kier+Wright, Inc. (Livermore, CA)
· Siegfried Engineering, Inc. (Stockton, CA)
The Selection Committee, comprised of Public Works staff, evaluated the proposals based on each firm’s understanding of work, experience with similar kinds of projects, staff qualifications and technical ability, and project approach.
Siegfried Engineering, Inc. received the highest ranking, based on the noted criteria, and was determined to be the most qualified firm for this project. Staff negotiated a fee of $968,800 with Siegfried Engineering, Inc. for professional engineering services. It is anticipated that the PRP and City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1808
File #: 23-0616, Version: 1
environmental documents will be completed by spring of 2025. The completed PRP will then be used to coordinate with ongoing development and seek potential grant funding sources that are available for PRP improvements.
A portion of the PRP limits are within the unincorporated San Joaquin County. As such, the City and County are discussing the overall cost of the project and the respective fair share for the City and County, respectively, for the PRP. In the future, staff may be returning to Council to authorize a City/San Joaquin County cooperative agreement for the Mariposa Road PRP, Project No.
WT23032.
Staff recommends Council adopt a resolution to award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $968,800 to Siegfried Engineering, Inc. for preparation of a PRP and environmental documents.
Staff also recommends Council adopt a resolution to appropriate funds in the amount of $150,000 from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan, Project No. WT23032.
Findings
Pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) section 3.68.070, Council may approve findings which support an exception to the competitive bidding process. These findings include:
1. The City does not have sufficient staff available to prepare the environmental documents or the PRP for this project.
2. Use of the RFP process is appropriate for this Professional Services Contract because it relies on the evaluation of professional qualifications and performance as the basis for selection of a vendor. Use of the criteria helps ensure selection of a vendor that will provide the highest quality professional service, which is in the public interest.
3. The City negotiated a contract following the solicitation of competitive proposals in accordance with SMC section 3.68.070.A.3.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Appropriate $150,000 from the Measure K Maintenance Fund Balance to the Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan, Project No. WT23032, Account No. 4510-000-800007-300-000-30-45-000-000. The resolution will sufficiently fund all remaining costs to successfully complete and approve the PRP and environmental documentation.
There is no impact to the City’s General Fund or any other unrestricted fund as a result of taking the recommended action.
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 8/16/2023
powered by Legistar™
1809
ATTACHMENT A
MARIPOSA ROAD PRECISE ROAD PLAN
(PROJECT NO. WT23032)
VICINITY MAP
NOTTO SCALE
LEGEND: N . - PROJECT LIMITS •
. □ CITY LIMITS
□ I COUNTY LIMITS
CITY OF STOCKTON
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
1810
Resolution No.
STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDING FOR THE MARIPOSA ROAD PRECISE ROAD PLAN, PROJECT NO. WT23032
On March 22, 2023, the City advertised a Request for Proposals (RFP) to prepare a Precise Road Plan and environmental documents, Project No. WT23032. Two proposals were received; and
The Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan will focus on Mariposa Road from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/Charter Way to Austin Road to develop a Precise Road Plan to determine the future configuration of this corridor; and After review of the proposals, it was determined that Siegfried Engineering, Inc. has the necessary knowledge, experience, and staff to perform the required work. Staff negotiated a fee of $968,800 with Siegfried Engineering, Inc. to prepare a Precise Road Plan (PRP) and environmental documents; and
Appropriation of funds is needed to fund all remaining costs to complete the Precise Road Plan, environmental documents, any additional consultant fees, and staff costs; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council awards a Professional Services Contract between the City of Stockton and Siegfried Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $968,800, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute same, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference.
2. The City Council approves findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.
These findings include:
A. The City does not have sufficient staff resources to prepare the environmental documents or the PRP for this project.
B. Use of the RFP process is appropriate for this Professional Services Contract because it relies on the evaluation of professional qualifications and performance as the basis for selection of a vendor. Use of the criteria 1811
helps ensure selection of a vendor that will provide the highest quality professional service, which is in the public interest.
C. The City negotiated a contract following the solicitation of competitive proposals in accordance with SMC section 3.68.070.A.3.
3. The City Council approves the appropriation of funds in the amount of $150,000 from the Measure K Maintenance fund balance to the Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan, Project No. WT32032.
4. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED August 22, 2023 .
KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1812
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is entered into this day of 2023, between the CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal corporation (“City”), and SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. whose address is 3428 BROOKSIDE ROAD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 (“Consultant”) for the MARIPOSA ROAD PRECISE ROAD PLAN (PROJECT NO.
WT23032), hereinafter referred to as "Project".
RECITALS
A. Consultant represents that it is licensed in the State of California and is qualified to provide the services proposed in the SCOPE OF WORK section of this Contract.
B. City finds it necessary and advisable to use the services of the Consultant for the purposes provided in this Contract.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions in this Contract, City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall undertake and complete the services described in Exhibit A. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A and compatible with the standards of the profession. Consultant agrees that it shall produce a fully complete project that is acceptable to the City.
2. COMPENSATION. City shall pay Consultant for services outlined in Exhibit A according to the fee not to exceed the schedule detailed in Exhibit B, which is attached to this Contract and incorporated by this reference. Consultant agrees this fee is for full remuneration for performing all services and furnishing all staffing and materials called for in the scope of services. The payments shall be made on a monthly basis upon receipt and approval of Consultant’s invoice. Total compensation for services and reimbursement for costs shall not exceed $968,800.00 or as otherwise mutually agreed to in a Contract Amendment.
3. INSURANCE. During the term of this Contract, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect at its own cost and expense the insurance coverage as set forth in the attached Exhibit C and shall otherwise comply with the other provisions of Exhibit C.
4. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS. With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification by Consultant to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, Consultant shall
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
indemnify, and hold harmless City, its Mayor, Council, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims and causes of action which result in liabilities, judgments, awards, losses, damages, expenses, and costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert and consultant fees, and other expenses of litigation) including, but not limited to, death or injury to persons, or damage to property, which arise out of any violation of federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent damages are caused by the Consultant’s negligent services provided under this Agreement, or are in any way caused by the negligent performance of work by the Consultant or Consultant’s officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors. Consultant shall not be obligated to indemnify or defend City for claims finally determined by a court of law or arbitrator to arise from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. It is the intent of the Parties that this indemnity obligation is at least as broad as is permitted under California law. To the extent California Civil Code sections 2782, et seq., limit the defense or indemnity obligations of Consultant to City, the intent hereunder is to provide the maximum defense and indemnity obligations allowed by Consultant under the law. The indemnity set forth in this section shall not be limited by insurance requirements or by any other provision of this Agreement.
With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification by Consultant to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, and in addition to the other indemnity obligations in this Agreement, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its Mayor, Council, officials, representatives, and employees from and against claims, losses, expenses, and costs including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of any claim brought against the City by an employee of Consultant, regardless of whether such claim may be covered by any applicable workers compensation insurance.
Consultant’s indemnification obligation is not limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable by or for the Consultant under workers’ compensation acts, disability acts, or other employee benefit acts.
5. SCHEDULE AND TERM. Consultant shall perform the scope of work as described in Exhibit A according to the schedule detailed in Exhibit D, which is attached to this Contract and incorporated by this reference. This Contract shall commence on the date written above and shall expire on September 30, 2028, unless extended by mutual agreement through the issuance of a Contract Amendment. a. Invoices submitted by Consultant to City must contain a brief description of work performed, time used, and include the City project number. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of approval of invoice by City. b. Upon completion of work and acceptance by City, Consultant shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which Consultant fails or neglects to
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after work is accepted by City.
6. CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE LAWS. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Consultant shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of services under this Contract on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.
a. TITLE VI
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that “no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” (42 USC Section 2000d).
http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titlevi.htm .
The City of Stockton requires compliance with the requirements of Title VI in all of its programs and activities regardless of funding source. b. DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT POLICY
The City of Stockton has a Discrimination and Harassment Policy Exhibit E. The purpose of this policy is to reaffirm the City’s commitment to demonstrating respect for all individuals by strictly prohibiting discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment in the workplace, to define the types of behavior and conduct prohibited by this policy, and to set forth a procedure for reporting, investigating, and resolving complaints of discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
c. LABOR STANDARDS PROVISIONS/CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE
The bidder shall understand that conditions set forth in Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the California Labor Code shall be considered part of the contract
agreement. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xht ml?lawCode=LAB&division=2.&title=&part=7.&chapter=1.&article=2. d. PREVAILING WAGE RATES
Consultant and any subcontractor shall pay each employee engaged in the trade or occupation not less than the prevailing hourly wage rate. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 of the Labor Code, the Director of Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
determined the general prevailing rates of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, and subsistence pay as provided for in Section 1773.1, apprenticeship or other training programs authorized by Section 3093 and similar purposes applicable to the work to be done. Consultant performing the work under this contract shall obtain a copy of the wage rate determination and shall distribute copies to each subcontractor. As the wage determination for each craft reflects an expiration date, it shall be the prime Consultant and each subcontractor's responsibility to ensure that the prevailing wage rates of concern is current and paid to the employee.
i. The Consultant performing the work shall be responsible for obtaining a copy of the State wage rate determination. State wage rates may be obtained at
http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/pwd/Determinations/Northern/Northern.p df. The Consultant shall be responsible for posting said wage rates at a prominent location at the work site and shall maintain same in a good readable condition for the duration of the work.
ii. Should the Consultant choose to work on a Saturday, Sunday or on a holiday recognized by the Labor Unions, the Consultant shall reimburse the City the actual cost of engineering, inspection, superintendence, and or other overhead expenses which are directly chargeable to the contract. Should such work be undertaken at the request of the City, reimbursement will not be required. To conform strictly with the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, of the Labor Code of the State of California. To forfeit as a penalty to City the sum of TWENTY-FIVE AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($25.00) for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed by CONTRACTOR, or by any subcontractor under Consultant, in the execution of this contract, for each calendar day during which any laborer, worker, or mechanic is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours and who is not paid the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work in violation of the provisions of Sections 1770 to 1781 of the Labor Code of the State of California. That all sums forfeited under the provisions of the foregoing sections shall be deducted from the payments to be made under the terms of this contract. iii. PAYROLL RECORDS - The Consultant to whom the contract is awarded shall ensure that the prime and each subcontractor will, in accordance with Section 1776 of the Labor Code, maintain certified payroll records. A copy of said records shall be provided with each invoice to the Public Works Department, Attention: Contract Compliance Officer. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to obtain copies of the current prevailing wage rate determination for all
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
subcontractors. Additionally, certified payroll records must be uploaded to the DIR website as required by labor code.
iv. APPRENTICESHIP STANDARDS - The Consultant shall comply with the provisions established in Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code concerning the 1) certified approval by local joint apprenticeship committees for the employment and training of apprentices, and 2) contribution of funds to administer and conduct apprenticeship programs, if applicable to the job.
e. SANCTIONS
Deliverables must conform with all applicable federal, state, and local laws.
Such conformity includes compliance with federal sanctions, and Contractor certifies that it has not and will not engage in prohibited transactions with sanctioned persons or entities.
7. RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITY. City shall make available to Consultant all data and information in the possession of City which both parties deem necessary to complete the work, and City shall actively aid and assist Consultant in obtaining such information as may be deemed necessary from other agencies and individuals.
8. OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT. Throughout the term of this Contract, Consultant represents and warrants that it has or will have at the time this Contract is executed, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for the Consultant to practice its professions, and Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, keep in effect during the life of this Contract all such licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals. Consultant shall meet with the Public Works Director or other personnel of City or third parties as necessary on all matters connected with the carrying out of Consultant’s services. Such meetings shall be held at the request of either party hereto. Consultant further warrants that it will follow the best current, generally accepted and professional practices to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding this project.
9. OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All reports, drawings, designs, plan review comments, work product, and all other documents completed or partially completed by Consultant in the performance of this Contract shall become and remain the property of the City. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Consultant agrees to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Contract. If any materials are lost, damaged, or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Consultant shall replace them at its own expense. Consultant shall keep materials confidential. Materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Contract and shall not
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services unless the City expressly provides prior written consent.
10. CONTRACT AMENDMENTS. City reserves the right to make such alterations as may be deemed necessary or advisable and to require such extra work as may be required for the proper completion of the work contemplated by Consultant. Any such changes will be set forth in a Contract Amendment which will specify, in addition to the work done in connection with the change made, adjustment of contract time, if any, and the basis of compensation for such work. A Contract Amendment will not become effective until approved by the authorized City official.
11. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Contract at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Consultant. The Contract shall then be deemed terminated and no further work shall be performed by Consultant. If the Contract is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for that percentage of work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.
12. CONSULTANT STATUS. In performing the obligations set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall have the status of an independent contractor and Consultant shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Consultant are its agents and employees, and are not agents of the City. Subcontractors shall not be recognized as having any direct or contractual relationship with the City. The persons engaged in the work, including employees of subcontractors and suppliers, will be considered employees of Consultant.
The Consultant shall be responsible for the work of subcontractors, which shall be subject to the provisions of this Contract. The Consultant is responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors and persons directly or indirectly employed by them. a. If in the performance of this Contract any third persons are employed by Consultant, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by Consultant.
i. It is further understood and agreed that Consultant must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Consultant’s personnel.
ii. As an independent contractor, Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against the City based upon any contention by any third party that employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
13. ASSIGNMENT. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Contract or any interest or obligation in the Contract without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Consultant shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subcontractors.
14. HEADINGS NOT CONTROLLING. Headings used in the Contract are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Contract.
15. NOTICES. Any and all notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
To Consultant: Siegfried Engineering, Inc. To City: Public Works Director 3428 Brookside Road City of Stockton
Stockton, CA 95219 22 E. Weber Ave., Rm. 301
Stockton, CA 95202
16. LICENSES, CERTIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS. Prior to the City’s execution of this Contract and prior to the Consultant’s engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall obtain a City of Stockton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Contract. Consultant covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Contract.
17. RECORDS AND AUDITS. City reserves the right to periodically audit all charges made by Consultant to City for services under this Contract. Upon request, Consultant agrees to furnish City, or a designated representative, with necessary information and assistance.
Consultant agrees that City or its delegate shall have the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to performance of the Contract. Consultant agrees to provide City or its delegate with any relevant information requested, and shall permit City or its delegate access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purposes of determining compliance with this Contract. Consultant agrees to maintain such records for a period of three years from the date that final payment is made.
18. CONFIDENTIALITY. Consultant shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.
19. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Consultant covenants that other than this Contract, Consultant has no financial interest with any official, employee, or other representative of the City. Consultant and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services under this Contract. If such an interest arises, Consultant will immediately notify City.
20. WAIVER. In the event either City or Consultant at any time waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Contract, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition, or obligation.
21. GOVERNING LAW. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue for all claims in the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin, Stockton Branch or, where applicable, in the federal District Court of California, Eastern District, Sacramento Division.
22. NO PERSONAL LIABILITY. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount due Consultant.
23. INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION. The response by Consultant to the Request for Proposals and the Request for Proposals on file with the City Clerk are hereby incorporated herein by reference to the extent that such documents do not differ from the provisions and terms of this Contract that shall supersede such response to Request for Proposals. This Contract represents the entire integrated agreement between Consultant and City, supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral, between the parties, and may be amended only by written instrument signed by Consultant and City. All exhibits and this contract are intended to be construed as a single document. Should any inconsistency occur between the specific terms of this Contract and the attached exhibits, the terms of this Contract will prevail.
24. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Contract are severable to the extent that should any of its provisions or terms be declared void in whole or in part by operation of law or agreement of the parties, the remainder of the provisions or terms not expressly declared void shall remain enforceable and in full effect.
25. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than City and Consultant. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
Professional Services Contract – SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. – PROJECT NO. WT23032 (Updated 07/12/22)
26. AUTHORITY. The undersigned hereby represent and warrant that they are authorized by the parties to execute this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF: the parties have executed this Contract the day and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF STOCKTON SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC.
By: By:
HARRY BLACK Signature
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
Print Name
BY:
ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC Title:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
Paul Schneider President
EXHIBIT 1
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Task 1 | Background Research
Siegfried will review and be familiar with the City of Stockton Bicycle Master Plan, 2040 City General Plan, and other development plans including outside agency plans such as San Joaquin County adopted plans. Siegfried will visit the project site to conduct a field reconnaissance of the project area. Siegfried will review and verify the location and type of existing improvements, equipment, bus zone locations, intersection geometrics, posted speed limit, and bus route movements. Siegfried will review collision reports, sight distance, approach speed, truck volume, and other geometrical and operational characteristics for the project.
Siegfried will perform a field topographical and property survey and map a 120’ wide corridor along Mariposa Rd. from approximately 100’ West of MLK, to approximately Austin Road as shown on the RFP vicinity map. Siegfried will also include mapping cross streets 150’ each side of the main corridor. Final delivery will be an acad.dwg file as well as TIN & DTM Surface files. Included in the deliverables will be a .2’ color orthophoto. This image will be delivered as a .TIFF with a .TFW world file and shown in the background of the PRP. Records of Survey and mapping are excluded, as are coroner records and monument preservation as improvements are not proposed at this time. Siegfried will gather existing as built plans from the City as well as prepare Utility A Letters to plot existing utilities in the background of the PRP for accurate planning around major utilities.
Siegfried will collect the following data for use in the analysis:
New 24-hour roadway segment vehicle classification counts on Mariposa Road at the following segments Between Martin Luther King Jr Blvd/Charter Way and Farmington Road Between Farmington Road and SR 99 SB Ramps
Between SR 99 NB Ramps and Stagecoach Road
Between Stagecoach Road and Carpenter Road
Between Carpenter Road and Austin Road
New AM (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak period traffic counts, including bicycle and pedestrian flows, vehicle classification, and maximum vehicle queue. Data will be collected on one day (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) at the following intersections:
Martin Luther King Jr/Charter Way/Mariposa Road
Mariposa Road/Learned Avenue
Mariposa Road/Pock Lane
Mariposa Road/Juliet Road
Mariposa Road/Farmington Road
Mariposa Road/SR 99 Frontage Road
Mariposa Road/SR 99 SB Ramps
Mariposa Road/SR 99 NB Ramps
Mariposa Road/Stagecoach Road
Mariposa Road/E Munford Avenue
Mariposa Road/Golden Valley Industries Driveway
Mariposa Road/Carpenter Road
Mariposa Road/Austin Road
Existing roadway geometrics and traffic controls, collected through peak period field observations Existing bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, collected through peak period field observations Corridor travel times during the AM and PM peak hours
Collision history – most recent 5-year period using SWITRS and TIMS data Previously collected speed surveys, provided by the City. No new speed surveys are included in this scope.
Current traffic signal timing plans for study intersections, provided by the City Planned roadway geometrics and traffic controls, provided by the City EXHIBIT A Page 10 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1822
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Planned development along the corridor study area, provided by the City Operation Analysis
The team will analyze AM and PM peak hour intersection operations for the intersections listed under Task 1. SimTraffic 11 microsimulation software, which applies methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022), will be used. Analysis results will include intersection level of service, control delay, travel time, and maximum queue lengths for key turning movements. The SimTraffic microsimulation network will be calibrated to the observed intersection volumes (i.e., percent demand served) and observed maximum queues.
Existing Active Transportation Network and Safety Review Siegfried will evaluate existing active transportation facilities on the corridor and complete a safety assessment. This will include:
Documentation of existing active transportation facilities, including an updated level of traffic stress analysis.
Documentation of all fatal/injury collisions and bike and pedestrian involved collisions between Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard/Charter Way and Austin Road. Data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and the UC Berkeley SafeTREC Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) will be used. We will review the locations of each collision along with the primary collision factors and type of vehicle involved in the collisions.
Findings for this task will be documented in a technical memorandum, provided to City staff for one round of review and comment.
Initial Planning and Alternatives Evaluation
Up to three alternative designs for Mariposa Road. Our work for this phase will focus on creating a shared understanding of the opportunities and tradeoffs associated with existing and potential active transportation facilities along the corridor. This process will involve:
Documentation of the pros, cons, and tradeoffs of each facility type. This will be informed by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guides on bikeway and crossing selection and will incorporate a Safe Systems approach to corridor planning.
Analysis of the proposed level of traffic stress (LTS) along the roadway for bike and pedestrian facilities. This will take into consideration number of lanes, design speed, and separation from the roadway.
Coordination with San Joaquin Regional Transit District (RTD) staff to discuss existing and future potential for transit ridership along the corridor based on planned development.
A review of the land use and growth assumptions along the corridor in the City’s 2040 General Plan and associated travel demand model.
Findings for this task will be documented in a technical memorandum, provided to City staff for one round of review and comment.
Where appropriate, the document will be graphically enhanced with high-level cross sections, sketches of potential treatments, and maps. We will also participate in a working session with City staff to discuss our findings, respond to questions, and identify a preferred alternative for the corridor.
AS-NEEDED VMT ANALYSIS
A VMT analysis may be necessary to remain consistent with the latest version of the City of Stockton Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines: INTERIM (December 2022), the base year Stockton TDM model will be used to evaluate short-term VMT effects of the proposed project. In addition, the cumulative year TDM model and/or the National Center for Sustainable Transportation (NCST) Calculator will be used to forecast long-term induced vehicle travel effects of the proposed project. As noted in the guidelines, VMT thresholds will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Note – because it is uncertain if the project will require VMT mitigation, VMT mitigation is not included in this scope of work. If mitigation is necessary, a supplemental scope may be required depending on the amount of VMT mitigation necessary.
Task 2 | Environmental Services
Task 2.1 | Background Research
ESA will review the 2040 City General Plan and associated EIR, the City of Stockton Bicycle Master Plan and associated IS/MND, the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP), and other planning and environmental documents pertinent to the project, with the goal of identifying potential opportunities to reference or rely upon previously completed efforts, and to limit potential for redundancy and/or conflicts with previously approved documentation. ESA anticipates that the CEQA EXHIBIT A Page 11 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1823
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx documentation prepared for the Mariposa Road Precise Plan Road Plan (Precise Plan) will tier from the 2040 City General Plan EIR (GP EIR); review of the GP EIR will be specifically aimed at identifying a tiering strategy for the Precise Plan CEQA document, and NEPA document.
Deliverables:
Draft tiering strategy for Precise Plan CEQA document.
Task 2.2 | Environmental Services
CEQA Documentation
ESA will prepare an EIR. The EIR will evaluate up to two build alternatives plus the “no build” alternative, and will include an Environmental Project Description based on information provided by the project team. An Environmental Checklist (Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines) will be completed to assess the level of significance of potential impacts. Each topic area will present the standards of significance; describe the affected environment; describe data sources and technical analyses used for the CEQA analysis; discuss project-specific impacts; identify if any potentially significant impacts where previously examined in the GP EIR; identify applicable mitigation measures from the GP EIR; identify additional mitigation measures, if necessary, and identify where potentially significant impacts remain significant and unavoidable following application of mitigation measures.
The analysis completed in the EIR will be supported by various technical investigations and studies that will be completed to examine in detail any potential impacts and recommended avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. Key technical investigations will include:
Air Quality:
The Precise Plan area is located within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) under the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). The SJVAPCD has prepared CEQA Guidelines for assessing the air quality impacts of projects. For the Air Quality section of the EIR, ESA will assess the consistency of the Precise Plan with applicable air quality plans for the SJVAB and discuss the potential for the Precise Plan to adversely affect air quality or impede attainment of air quality goals. ESA will estimate off-road construction equipment emissions and on-road construction vehicle emissions using the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District’s (SMAQMD) Roadway Construction Model, OFFROAD2017 and EMFAC2021 models, as appropriate, for comparison to the applicable SJVAPCD significance thresholds for construction. While the Precise Plan would not create any new operational emissions sources, implementation of the Precise Plan would change operational traffic volume, speed, and fleet mix as a result of the roadway widening, and bicycle and transit infrastructure improvements. Changes in emissions would be estimated based on traffic data provided for the Precise Plan using EMFAC2021 emission factors for comparison with the SJVAPCD’s operational thresholds. This assumes that changes to traffic volumes, speed profile and fleet mix with and without the Precise Plan will be available for analysis.
Future construction activities associated with implementation of the Precise Plan would take place in proximity to sensitive receptors (residences) adjacent to Mariposa Road. The Office of Environmental Hazard Health Assessment (OEHHA) requires that a health risk assessment (HRA) be conducted if construction activities in the vicinity of sensitive receptors (residences) would take place for more than two continuous months. Though future construction activities associated with the Precise Plan may occur in phases, the HRA will assume that all construction will occur in one phase to conservatively estimate the maximum health risk impacts. ESA will conduct the construction HRA in accordance with guidance from OEHHA and CARB. The HRA will use U.S. EPA’s AERMOD dispersion model and health risk parameters specified by OEHHA. AERMOD uses site-specific meteorological and terrain data to provide conservative pollutant concentrations for the HRA. Concentrations at receptors will be converted to health risks using parameters specified by OEHHA and compared to the SJVAPCD’s health risk thresholds. An operational HRA is not included in this scope as the Precise Plan would not be anticipated to create any new operational sources of toxic air contaminants, and induced vehicle traffic resulting from implementation of the Precise Plan would not be anticipated to generate a substantial increase in toxic air contaminants, such that an operational HRA would be warranted.
ESA will identify applicable policies and mitigation measures from the GP EIR, and if necessary, identify additional practical, feasible mitigation measures for any air quality impacts identified from the Precise Plan identified as significant and evaluate whether mitigation measures would reduce the impacts below a level of significance.
Aquatic Resources Delineation Report:
EXHIBIT A Page 12 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1824
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Two waterways and several large roadside ditches/swales are in or near the project area. An aquatic resources delineation will be performed to quantify the existing jurisdictional waters within the project site. The USACE jurisdiction will be determined in the field using the presence of an ordinary high-water mark and the methodology in the USACE 1987 wetland delineation manual and any applicable regional supplements. CDFW jurisdiction will be determined by the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, the location of a definable bed and bank, and the presence of associated riparian, wildlife, or fish resources. The boundaries of these jurisdictions will be mapped on figures of an appropriate scale and provided to Siegfried in GIS shape files.
A stand-alone Aquatic Resources Delineation Report (ARDR) will be prepared describing jurisdictional waters and wetlands in the project area. The report will include methods, results, and a graphic depicting the approximate size and location of any jurisdictional areas. The report will be consistent with the requirements of USACE, RWQCB and CDFW. Copies of field data sheets will be included. The report will describe delineation methodology and jurisdictional areas of the site. The report will provide the necessary documentation for developing and processing subsequent Section 401 permit and/or Waste Discharge permit, 404 permit, and Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, if applicable.
Biological Resources:
ESA will complete a background review and biological resources reconnaissance survey of the project area to assess and document protected biological resources present or those with potential to occur, evaluate potential impacts on biological resources that may result from project construction and operation, and identify applicable mitigation measures. It is anticipated the project will be covered under the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). Mitigation measures identified for biological resources will be consistent with the SJMSP, as well as the GP EIR and/or, if necessary, additional mitigation measures will be identified to reduce the project’s impacts. The biological resources evaluation will also identify any expected regulatory permits that may be required for the project prior to construction, and if consultations pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) would be expected upon programming of federal funding for the project.
A Natural Environment Study (NES) will be prepared to document the analysis and results for both CEQA and NEPA.
Cultural Resources:
ESA will contact the Native American Heritage Commission to request information on known sacred sites in the project vicinity and draft letters for the City to send to Native American tribes who have requested consultation in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.3(b). The results of any Native American consultation will provide the basis for the tribal cultural resources section of the CEQA document.
ESA will also complete a records search at the California Historical Resources Information System’s Central California Information Center (CCIC) to identify know locations of archaeological and historic resources. ESA will then examine the potential impacts of the project on archaeological and historic resources, identify applicable mitigation measures from the GP EIR and/or, if necessary, identify additional mitigation measures to reduce project’s impacts to below the level of significance. This scope assumes that no historic-era architectural resources are in the project area that would need to be recorded and evaluated. This scope also does not include a subsurface study to test for the presence of buried archaeological resources; if deemed necessary these tasks would be scoped separately.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be estimated using the CalEEMod, OFFROAD2017, and EMFAC2021 models, as described for the air quality evaluation. The GHG section of the IS/MND will rely on the significance criteria in the Appendix G CEQA checklist in assessing the project’s potential impacts. The SJVAPCD has not updated its guidance regarding the evaluation of GHG impacts with respect to SB 32 and AB 1279 targets. In addition, the City of Stockton does not have an adopted “qualified” climate action plan (CAP) that can be used for streamlining project review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15183.5. In the absence of updated guidance from the SJVAPCD and the City, the analysis of GHG impacts will rely on guidance from other major air districts such as the Sacramento metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) for thresholds and analysis methodologies for the evaluation of construction GHG impacts. As the implementation of the Precise Plan would not generate additional traffic, but only accommodate traffic envisioned by the City’s General Plan and EXHIBIT A Page 13 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1825
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx already analyzed under the General Plan EIR, operational GHG impacts will be discussed qualitatively based on the project’s consistency with the General Plan.
The analysis will also evaluate the consistency of implementation of the Precise Plan with other plans such as the 2022 Scoping Plan Update, the San Joaquin Council of Governments’ Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy, and the City of Stockton Climate Action Plan.
ESA will identify applicable policies and mitigation measures from the GP EIR, and if necessary, identify additional mitigation measures, to reduce GHG emissions resulting from implementation of the project and to reconcile any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable plans.
Noise:
Sensitive noise receptors, including residential uses, are located adjacent to the project area. ESA will complete a noise analysis to predict noise impacts associated with project construction and operation. ESA will identify applicable noise standards and thresholds, model predicted construction and operational noise as well as assess vibration levels from project construction equipment based on proximity to structures, identify predicted exceedances of applicable noise standards and thresholds, identify applicable mitigation measures from the GP EIR, and if necessary, identify additional practical and feasible mitigation measures reduce noise impacts to below a level of significance. Analysis of potential construction-related noise and vibration impacts will use the Roadway Construction Noise Model and vibration levels for construction equipment and building damage and human annoyance criteria published by the Federal Transit Administration. Operational impacts from the change in traffic along the roadway will be evaluated using methodology from Caltrans Traffic Noise Protocol.
A Noise Study Report (NSR) will be prepared to document the analysis and results for both CEQA and NEPA.
Visual Impact Assessment:
To assess the potential for the project to substantially change the visual environmental of the corridor, specifically as it relates to potential removal of large trees in the corridor and/or changes to the nonurbanized character of portions of the project area, ESA will complete a visual impact assessment. The assessment will include photographs and description of the project area’s existing visual character, description of the anticipated changes to the visual environment that may occur from the project, including up to three photo-realistic visual simulations depicting the project area after construction of the project, an analysis of the significance of the change in the visual setting, and identification of mitigation measures that would reduce potentially significant impacts.
A Moderate Visual Impact Assessment (Moderate VIA) will be prepared to document the analysis and results or both CEQA and NEPA.
Whenever appropriate, ESA will seek to complete CEQA studies and documentation with NEPA requirements in mind, and/or in the format required by the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER), so that they may be relied upon to also support NEPA review in the most streamlined and efficient way possible.
Other topic areas that will be examined in the CEQA document may include Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, Wildfire (if not excluded from further review through the Initial Study process), and Mandatory Findings of Significance.
ESA will prepare an Initial Study to identify the topic areas to be evaluated in the EIR. The Initial Study will be attached to a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and circulated for a 30-day period.
Following circulation of the NOP, ESA will prepare an Administrative Draft EIR for review by the project team and City.
Following internal review of the Administrative Draft EIR, ESA will review the project team and City’s comments and make changes as necessary, resulting in a Public Draft EIR that is ready for distribution. ESA will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) for review by the City. ESA will then submit the Draft EIR along with the NOC to the State Clearinghouse (electronic submittal).
EXHIBIT A Page 14 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1826
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx At the close of the anticipated 30-day public review period, ESA will prepare a Final EIR by preparing responses to comments, and errata outlining any recommended changes to the text of the Public Draft EIR, the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Plan (MMRP), and Notice of Determination (NOD). ESA will support City staff with acceptance and certification of the document by City Council by assisting City staff with presentation materials for City Council review and attending the adoption hearing. It is assumed the City will prepare the project Findings. Within five days of the adoption of the EIR, ESA will file the NOD with the State Clearinghouse.
NEPA Documentation
ESA will prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) to support a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for use by Caltrans District 10 Division of Local Assistance in completing NEPA review of the project. The analysis completed in the EA will be supported by the applicable technical investigations and studies prepared to support the CEQA review, as described above, plus additional studies and consultations specific to NEPA as follows:
Air Quality Conformity Assessment:
The project is located in an area designated as nonattainment for federal ozone and PM ambient air quality standards. As a result, preparation of an Air Quality Conformity Assessment (AQCA) will be required. ESA will prepare the AQCA based on information contained in the AQAR. ESA will prepare the forms and supporting documentation required for submittal of the project for interagency PM conformity review (e.g., Interagency Consultation [IAC]). It is assumed that the project would not be identified as a Project of Air Quality Concern (POAQC). The AQCA will be prepared using the Caltrans AQCA template and in accordance with applicable guidance and methodologies. Upon completion of the AQAR, AQCA, and interagency consultation for the project, ESA will complete a Caltrans Transportation Air Quality Conformity Findings Checklist to document that all air quality conformity requirements for the project have been met.
Section 106 Compliance:
In addition to the notifications and cultural resources investigations completed to support CEQA, ESA will complete notifications to Native American tribes pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106), and prepare cultural resources documentation in the format required by Caltrans, which would consist of an Area of Potential Effect (APE) map, a Historical Property Survey Report (HPSR) and Archaeological Survey Report (ASR). It is assumed that no historic structures would be in the project area and preparation of an Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER) would not be required.
ESA will prepare an Administrative Draft EA for review by the project team, City and Caltrans. Following internal review of the Administrative Draft EA, ESA will review comments and make changes as necessary, resulting in a Public Draft EA that is ready for distribution. Following public review of the Draft EA, ESA will prepare a FONSI for Caltrans’ use in approving NEPA for the project.
If possible and appropriate, the EA will be combined with the EIR prepared for the project and completed in the Caltrans format for a combined EIR/EA.
Deliverables:
Electronic copies, in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF, of environmental technical studies: Air Quality Assessment Report, Aquatic Resources Delineation Report, Natural Environment Study, Noise Study Report; Moderate Visual Impact Assessment, Air Quality Conformity Assessment, Historic Property Survey Report/Archaeological Survey Report.
Electronic copies, in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF, of Initial Study, Administrative Draft Environmental Document, Administrative Final Environmental Document, and all associated notices for internal reviews.
Public review-ready PDF of Draft Environmental Document and associated notices suitable for posting on the City’s website and at the State Clearinghouse, and for electronic transmittal to interested parties and/or a circulation list.
Up to five hard copies of Draft Environmental Document for posting at physical locations desired by the City.
Electronic copies, in Adobe PDF, of Final Environmental Document, FONSI, MMRP and associated notices.
Key Assumptions:
The project would be exempt from the requirement to prepare an Induced Traffic Analysis model.
EXHIBIT A Page 15 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1827
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx The project will be programmed into the current, conforming San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) Regional Transportation Plan & Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and the SJCOG Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP) prior to initiating air quality studies for the project.
Preparation of a Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) or equivalent is not included in this scope of work; this report or its equivalent can be completed under an amended agreement if necessary.
Preparation of a Biological Assessment (BA) and consultation with federal wildlife agencies pursuant to Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act will not be required. If upon completion of the Natural Environment Study prepared for the project it is determined that the project may affect federally listed species; ESA is available to prepare a BA and support Section 7 consultation under an amended agreement.
The City of Stockton will be the CEQA Lead Agency and San Joaquin County and Caltrans will be CEQA Responsible Agencies for purposes of actions that take place within their areas of authority within the project area. San Joaquin County will be provided one electronic copy of the Administrative Draft CEQA document for their review and comment; one round of County review is assumed.
The City will post environmental documents and associated notices to their website for public review.
The project team, and the City, will develop a circulation list to send the NOI to and transmit the NOI; NOIs will be circulated electronically.
The City will publish the NOI in a local newspaper.
City will send the NOP and NOC to the County Clerk’s office for posting and pay for any submittal or posting fees.
It is assumed that up to five substantive comments will be received on the Public Draft Environmental Document.
City will submit the NOD to the County Clerk and will pay for any submittal or posting fees, such as the CDFW fee and County Clerk filing fee.
City staff will prepare the project findings for City Council approval.
The Final EIR will be approved and adopted by the City Council during one hearing.
Completion of an SJVAPCD Air Impact Assessment (AIA) Application pursuant to Rule 9510 would be completed prior to project construction and is not included in this scope of work.
Task 3 | Preparation of Precise Roadway Plan (PRP)
The team will work collaboratively to integrate the recommendations from our Initial Planning and Conceptual Design memo and analysis to reflect the survey data, traffic analysis, land use, circulation, geometric criteria and the 2040 General Plan.
Consideration will be given to proposed development plans along the corridor.
Task 3.1 | | Geometric PRP and Traffic Report
Siegfried believes that to refine the Specific Plan the lane geometry must be designed and based on real survey data. The purpose of the more detailed design will be to review the horizontal design with the City of Stockton and finalize the conceptual plan. We understand that any minor change made to the horizontal design may require complete redesign in the future, so we feel that it is best to identify and finalize the precise curb and lanes at this stage. The following items will be clearly indicated and reflected in our submittal:
Final lane configuration(s)
Finalized face of curb design including crosswalks, bike ramps, truck aprons, etc.
Design vehicle(s) movement checks using AUTOTURN
Locations of all multimodal paths, sidewalks, bike ramps, etc. with appropriate widths Overall lane markings and pavement arrows for the entire study area Major Utility trunk lines, such as the Delta Water Supply, and their position within the ultimate configuration Design file showing actual measurements of the design parameters Calculations showing the stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance Fast Path speed calculations at entry and circulating
Lighting Layout
Tree Plan
EXHIBIT A Page 16 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1828
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Based on the signal geometry in the traffic memo, the intersections will be proposed with the appropriate lane geometry, signing and striping, traffic signal poles, and be analyzed for potential congestion management concepts.
Conceptual Design
Once a preferred alternative has been identified, we will provide conceptual design support to the team on incorporating bicycle and pedestrian facilities into the precise road plan. Final elements will be determined after the evaluation of alternatives, and may include:
Bikeway design details such as Separate Bikeway buffers and vertical elements or side path widths and details Details of bicycle and pedestrian crossing
Protected intersections, if Class IV facilities are selected Conceptual signal modifications and intersection design recommendations Lighting analysis and design
Sight distance evaluation at up to three locations
Design speed recommendations, based on published standards and site specific context The conceptual design will be presented to the team and City staff for two rounds of iterative review and comment.
Existing Plus Project Traffic Operations Analysis
As part of the Stockton Transportation Master Plan and Impact Fee Study, Fehr & Peers is updating the City of Stockton travel demand forecasting (TDF) model to reflect 2022 conditions. Fehr & Peers plans to use the updated 2022 base year City of Stockton TDF model for the Precise Road Plan, anticipating it will be available before the start of this project. The TDF model will be used to develop intersection turning movement volume forecasts for an “Existing Plus Project” scenario. Fehr & Peers will add an appropriate level of roadway network and traffic analysis zone detail to the model to support intersection-level analysis and project development.
Fehr & Peers will use analysis methods to analyze the intersection operations under Existing Plus Project (Preferred Alternative) conditions. Maximum queue lengths for key turning movements will be used to provide recommendations on turn pocket lengths at the study intersections. Ramp queuing at the Caltrans intersections is not anticipated to extend to the mainline, therefore, a mainline operations analysis is not included in this scope of work. If a mainline operations analysis is required, a supplemental scope will be provided.
Fehr & Peers will present the findings of the Existing Plus Project analysis to City staff and have budgeted for up to two (2) rounds of revisions to the analysis to incorporate any refinements to the preferred alternative scenario (based upon the outcome of the traffic operations analysis).
Cumulative No Project Conditions
Fehr & Peers will use the General Plan scenario of the Stockton TDF model to develop intersection turning movement volume forecasts under the Cumulative No Project conditions. Roadway network and TAZ edits made to reflect existing conditions in the 2022 base year model will be incorporated into the Cumulative scenario, as necessary and appropriate, to support intersectionlevel analysis. However, it is noted that this scope of work does not include updates to the Cumulative TDF network for the Mariposa Lakes project. The land use and access assumptions included in the General Plan model for Mariposa Lakes will be used as is. If modifications for Mariposa Lakes are required, a scope amendment may be required depending on the intensity of the modifications.
Fehr & Peers will use the analysis methods outlined to analyze the intersection operations under Cumulative No Project conditions.
Analysis results will include intersection level of service, control delay, travel time, and maximum queue lengths for key turning movements. Maximum queue lengths for key turning movements will be used to provide recommendations on turn pocket lengths at the study intersections. Ramp queuing at the Caltrans intersections is not anticipated to extend to the mainline, therefore, a mainline operations analysis is not included in this scope of work. If a mainline operations analysis is required, a supplemental scope will be provided.
Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Operations Analysis
Fehr & Peers will use the analysis methods outlined in Task 2.1 to analyze the intersection operations under Cumulative Plus Project (Preferred Alternative) conditions. Intersection operations will be analyzed for one preferred alternative scenario. The team EXHIBIT A Page 17 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1829
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx will coordinate with City staff to review the lane configuration and traffic control assumptions of the SimTraffic models for the preferred alternative scenario.
Fehr & Peers will present the findings of the Cumulative Plus Project analysis to City staff and provide up to two (2) rounds of revisions to the analysis to incorporate any refinements to the preferred alternative scenario (based upon the outcome of the traffic operations analysis).
The Cumulative Plus Project analysis will also include a review of proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities and will evaluate the potential for additional crosswalks, bike lanes or modified crossing treatments along the study corridor.
Deliverable: Geometric plans (30% draft PRP), Draft Traffic Analysis Report Task 3.2 | 60% Precise Road Plan
Based upon the refined master plan in Task 3.1 Siegfried will prepare the project Precise Roadway Plan (PRP) in accordance with Stockton’s Municipal Code Title 16 Development Code, Division 5. Land Use/Development Procedures, and Chapter 16.148 Precise Road Plans. More specifically the PRP will be in accordance with the following:
Plan sheets that are 24 inches by 36 inches and scaled at one (1) inch to 50 feet. Additionally, reduced, legible drawings of each large drawing sized at eight and one-half (8-1/2) by 11 inches will also be provided. The following minimum information shall be contained in the drawings:
The existing design of the roadway (e.g., existing access points, lane configurations, existing rights-of-way, and the alignment) affected by the precise road plan adoption/amendment The proposed precise road plan design as adopted by the master plan Land Uses. Existing and proposed land uses, where applicable, affected by the precise road plan will be indicated on the drawings.
Overall the precise road plan will contain additional information such as proposed plant material, amenity locations, water sources, lighting locations, and any considerations that are contained in the adopted 2012 Bike Master Plan. This in accordance with the characteristics of the area to be covered by the plan, applicable policies of the General Plan, and overall City ordinance 015-09 C.S., eff. 12-3-09; prior code § 16-550.050.
Deliverable: 65% Precise Road Plan for City review.
TASK 3.3 | 100% Precise Road Plan
Based upon the comments received from the City from the 50% Precise Road plan submittal Siegfried and the project team will prepare the 100% project Precise Roadway Plan (PRP) and Final Traffic Report for City review. It is anticipated that the City designated Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the proposed precise road plan and forward a written recommendation to the Director.
TASK 3.4 | Final Precise Road Plan and Hearings
Based upon the comments received from the City from the 100% Precise Road plan submittal Siegfried and the project team will prepare the Final project Precise Roadway Plan (PRP) for City adoption. Following final review by the Director and the precise road plan adoption or amendment being deemed complete and reviewed by the DRC, Siegfried will attend the required public hearings conducted by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors, and Council. All required public noticing, staff reports, and agenda preparation shall be by the City.
Deliverable: Adopted Precise Road Plan
Task 4 | Public Outreach
Siegfried will research and develop a coded database of potentially interested parties, which will be updated throughout the project with names from the public meeting(s) sign-in; information from the project team; and from telephone, e-mail and personal contacts. The database will be coded according to interest and involvement with the project. Among the groups on the stakeholders list will be the following:
Council member Kimberly Warmsley and other elected and appointed officials Residents and property owners adjacent to the proposed project area Businesses and other establishments adjacent to the project area Emergency responders
EXHIBIT A Page 18 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1830
F:\23projects\23097 City of Stockton Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan\Marketing\Scope and Fee\23097 Mariposa Road PRP Scope Rev 1.docx Stockton Unified School District
Public Transit
San Joaquin County
Caltrans
Utility Companies
Pertinent City staff
Public Information Meetings will be held to present concepts and design features to neighboring residents and businesses, and to the general public. Siegfried will determine a location near the project site to have the meeting. The meetings will be designed primarily to provide information on the project features, and goals.
Siegfried will plan for at least two (2) public outreach meetings and a public hearing near the project completion phase. Siegfried will also attend planning commission meetings, public hearing meetings, and meetings with stakeholders as required for the duration of the project.
Siegfried will schedule the public meetings/hearing, make arrangements for the meeting facility, handle other logistics, issue meeting notices (U.S. mail invitations, news releases, print advertisements, and flyers), and provide information for the City website. Working with the project team, Siegfried will also prepare exhibits to illustrate design concepts and project features and prepare other print materials, e.g., agendas, sign-in sheets, fact sheets, signage, that describes roundabouts. Siegfried will record public comments and prepare a very detailed Summary Report of each meeting. Working with the project team, Siegfried will provide appropriate responses to all comments, and make recommendations for administrative and public review.
Siegfried will establish an email contact list and maintain a detailed contact log of every contact. Social media options to dispense information will also be available, if desired and/or acceptable to the City of Stockton. In addition, Siegfried will create and maintain a website for the project which will serve as the digital information hub for the project. Project updates and other pertinent information will be housed on the website. The website will also include a comment section, so constituents can make comments regarding the project. Detailed records of each contact will be provided to the City and Project Team Staff at frequent intervals.
Siegfried will attend the required Planning Commission Meetings, Council Meetings and Board of Supervisors Meetings.
TASK 5 | Coordination/Meetings
Siegfried will provide project management services to meet the project scope, schedule and budget as set forth in the accepted proposal. Siegfried will maintain a clear and consistent communication framework for the duration of the project and attend meetings with City staff, public, businesses, and individuals as needed. The proposed scope of work will include an effective project management approach that includes regular project updates and coordination between the consultant and City staff.
EXHIBIT A Page 19 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1831
WORK BREAKDOWN CHART FOR
Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan Project
June 9, 2023
Siegfried
Classification/Subconsultant
Task 1 - Background Research, Data
Collection, Analysis, and Concept Design Task 2 - Environmental Services Task 3.1 - Geometric PRP and Traffic Report 30% Task 3.2 - 60% PRP Task 3.3 - 100% PRP Task 3.3 - Final PRP Task 4 - Public Outreach Task 5 - Coordination & Meetings Total Hours Hour y Rate l Managing Principal - Paul Schneider 32 24 60 60 40 24 40 120 400 $268.00 $107,200 Principal - Survey - Kevin Genasci 80 8 8 8 4 4 112 $240.00 $26,880 Senior Associate - Civil QA/QC _Alex Heuer 4 8 8 6 2 28 $211.00 $5,908 Senior Associate - Landscape - Bob Norbutas 8 8 8 8 24 56 $211.00 $11,816 Associate - Public Outreach - Chris Kay 100 100 $188.00 $18,800 Project Engineer - Ryan Gleave 44 120 120 120 40 48 492 $178.00 $87,576 Engineer II - Lauren Sensibaugh 80 80 80 24 264 $163.00 $43,032 Engineer I - Cathy Katkanova 20 16 16 4 56 $146.00 $8,176 Landscape Architect I - Regina Paredes 16 16 16 8 24 80 $126.00 $10,080 Senior Technician - Greg Smoy 24 24 $142.00 $3,408
Technician III - Anhtony Linnerman 20 16 16 4 40 96 $126.00 $12,096 Technician I - Dalton Reed 80 80 $93.00 $7,440
Surveyor II - Manny Debranca 80 80 $161.00 $12,880
Party Chief - Scott Soares 120 120 $217.00 $26,040
ESA - Principal Consultant 5 - Melissa Logue 77 16 93 $279.00 $25,947 ESA - Senior Consultant 4 - Jon Teofilo 304 24 30 358 $181.00 $64,798 ESA - Principal Consultant 1- Heidi Koenig 14 14 $199.00 $2,786 ESA - Senior Consultant 1 - Zach Leisz 160 160 $163.00 $26,080 ESA - Managing Consultant 1 - Chuck Hughes 106 106 $140.00 $14,840 ESA- Principal Consultant 3 - Mike Burns 2 2 $180.00 $360 ESA - Associate Consultant 2 - Laura Dodson 424 424 $137.00 $58,088 ESA - Senior Consultant 5 - Jyothi Iyler 206 206 $194.00 $39,964 ESA - Managing Consultant 3 - Cheri Velzy 60 60 $209.00 $12,540 ESA - Consultant 5 - Julina Medan 608 30 638 $122.00 $77,836 ESA - Senior Consultant 3 Brad Allen 40 40 $167.00 $6,680 ESA - Managing Consultant 3 - Dave Davis 40 40 $209.00 $8,360 F&P - Principal - Adrain Engel 4 2 28 8 8 4 54 $265.00 $14,310 F&P - Associate - Kari McNickle 14 26 16 8 8 12 4 88 $225.00 $19,800 F&P - Project Manager - Carly Hoyt 50 4 80 60 40 40 8 282 $185.00 $52,170 F&P - Planner Engineer - Feslia Chen 102 4 200 80 60 14 460 $135.00 $62,100 F&P - GIS Analyst - Marty Delgado 16 2 16 8 8 8 58 $130.00 $7,540 F&P - Support Jolyn Souto 13 4 16 16 6 5 60 $135.00 $8,100 WTrans - Principal Traffic QA/QC - Atul Patel 8 8 8 4 28 $285.00 $7,980 Aerial Mapping $45,000 $45,000 $45,000
Traffic Counts $8,500 $8,500 $8,500
Total Hours 663 2081 714 528 448 201 264 260 5159
Category Total $170,785 $329,423 $124,822 $95,244 $79,912 $37,635 $49,692 $57,598 $945,111 Reimburables
$2,515 $8,577 $578 $256 $188 $665 $10,308 $602
Task Totals $173,300 $338,000 $125,400 $95,500 $80,100 $38,300 $60,000 $58,200 Not-To-Exceed Fee $968,800
EXHIBIT B
REV 2022‐05‐17
Insurance Requirements for Professional Services
Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (nonowned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees)
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance appropriates to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.
If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Stockton requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Stockton.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
EXHIBIT C Page 21 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1833
REV 2022‐05‐17
The City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). Additional insured Name of Organization shall read “City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.” Policy shall cover City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for all locations work is done under this contract.
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stockton, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. The City of Stockton does not accept endorsements limiting the Contractor’s insurance coverage to the sole negligence of the Named Insured.
Umbrella or Excess Policy
The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Contractor’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City of Stockton.
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City of Stockton a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Stockton by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this EXHIBIT C Page 22 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1834
REV 2022‐05‐17
provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Stockton has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Stockton. The City of Stockton may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City of Stockton. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City of Stockton. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City of Stockton may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City of Stockton reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Stockton.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.
EXHIBIT C Page 23 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1835
REV 2022‐05‐17
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Stockton with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City of Stockton before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City of Stockton reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City of Stockton is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.
Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City of Stockton reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
Certificate Holder Address
The address for mailing certificates, endorsements and notices shall be:
City of Stockton
Its Officers, Officials, Employees, and Volunteers
400 E Main Street, 3rd Floor – HR
Stockton, CA 95202
EXHIBIT C Page 24 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1836
29 CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ GEOTECHNICAL ■ SURVEY ■ LANDSCAPE ■ PARTNERING ■ ATHLETICS 3428 Brookside Road, Stockton, CA 95219
■
t | 209.943.2021 f | 209.942.0214
■ siegfriedeng.com
SCHEDULE
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan 538 days Mon 7/17/23 Wed 8/6/25 2 City Issues NTP 0 days Mon 7/17/23 Mon 7/17/23
3 Background Research 50 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 9/22/23
4 Obtain Historical Documents 15 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 8/4/23 5 Research Boundary 15 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 8/4/236 Prepare Utility A Letters 5 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 7/21/23 7 Traffic Data Collection 35 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 9/1/23 8 Rights of Entry and Biological Site Review 35 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 9/1/239 Perform Topographic and Boundary Surveys
35 days Mon 8/7/23 Fri 9/22/23
10 Public Outreach 295 days Mon 9/25/23 Mon 11/11/24
11 Prepare Public Outreach Plan and
Stakeholder List
20 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 10/20/23
12 City Review of Public Outreach Plan 7 days Mon 10/23/23 Tue 10/31/23 13 Send Meeting Notice #1 10 days Wed 11/1/23 Tue 11/14/2314 Informational Meeting #1 0 days Tue 11/14/23 Tue 11/14/2315 Individual Stakeholder Meetings 60 days Mon 10/23/23 Fri 1/12/24 16 Informational Meeting #2 0 days Mon 11/11/24 Mon 11/11/24 17 Precise Road Plan 425 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 5/9/25
18 Geometric Study - 30% 60 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 12/15/23 19 Prepare Geometric Study and
Perform Traffic Analysis
60 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 12/15/23
20 Traffic Memo and VMT Analysis 45 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 11/24/2321 Agency Plan Check 20 days Mon 10/30/23 Fri 11/24/2322 Discuss Comments With City 0 days Fri 11/24/23 Fri 11/24/2323 60% Precise Road Plan 80 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 3/15/24 24 Prepare for 60% PRP Submittal 60 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 2/16/24 25 Agency Review 20 days Mon 2/19/24 Fri 3/15/2426 100% Precise Road Plan 60 days Mon 3/18/24 Fri 6/7/24 27 Prepare for 100% PRP Submittal 30 days Mon 3/18/24 Fri 4/26/24 28 Agency Review 20 days Mon 4/29/24 Fri 5/24/2429 Development Review Committee and Director Review
10 days Mon 5/27/24 Fri 6/7/24
30 Final Precise Road Plan 240 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 5/9/25 31 Prepare and Finalize PRP 40 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 8/2/24 32 Director Approval of PRP 35 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 9/20/24 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Qtr 2, 2024 Qtr 3, 2024 Qtr 4, 2024 Qtr 1, 2025 Qtr 2, 2025 Qtr 3, 2025
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan Project
Fri 4/28/23 1 of 2
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT 1
1837
30 CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ GEOTECHNICAL ■ SURVEY ■ LANDSCAPE ■ PARTNERING ■ ATHLETICS 3428 Brookside Road, Stockton, CA 95219
■
t | 209.943.2021 f | 209.942.0214
■ siegfriedeng.com
SCHEDULE
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
33 Planning Commission Approval
(2nd/4th Thurs)
30 days Mon 3/31/25 Fri 5/9/25
34 Environmental Clearance 538 days Mon 7/17/23 Wed 8/6/25 35 Identify Study Corridor and Project
Conceptual Description
15 days Mon 7/17/23 Fri 8/4/23
36 Preliminary Environmental Study
(PES) and Initial Study
73 days Mon 8/7/23 Wed 11/15/23
37 Prepare the Draft PES 10 days Mon 8/7/23 Fri 8/18/23 38 City Review 3 days Mon 8/21/23 Wed 8/23/23
39 Caltrans Review and Field Review 45 days Thu 8/24/23 Wed 10/25/23 40 Revise and Finalize PES 15 days Thu 10/26/23 Wed 11/15/2341 Prepare Admin Draft Initial Study 15 days Mon 8/7/23 Fri 8/25/23 42 City Review 5 days Mon 8/28/23 Fri 9/1/23
43 Prepare Initial Study for Circulation 5 days Mon 9/4/23 Fri 9/8/2344 Circulate Initial Study 30 days Mon 9/11/23 Fri 10/20/23 45 Prepare Studies 140 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 6/7/24
46 Prepare Environmental Technical
Studies
140 days Mon 11/27/23 Fri 6/7/24
47 CEQA EIR and NEPA EA 242 days Mon 6/10/24 Tue 5/13/25 48 Prepare Admin Draft Environmental
Document
40 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 8/2/24
49 City, County, and Caltrans Review 45 days Mon 8/5/24 Fri 10/4/24 50 Prepare Env Document For Public
Circulation
10 days Mon 10/7/24 Fri 10/18/24
51 Public Circulation of Documents 30 days Mon 10/21/24 Fri 11/29/2452 Respond to Comments and Prepare Admin Draft Document
20 days Mon 12/2/24 Fri 12/27/24
53 City and Caltrans Review 45 days Mon 12/30/24 Fri 2/28/25 54 Revise and Finalize Documents 20 days Mon 3/3/25 Fri 3/28/2555 City Council Review of Final EIR and MMRP
32 days Mon 3/31/25 Tue 5/13/25
56 Final Approvals and Filing 61 days Wed 5/14/25 Wed 8/6/25 57 City Council Approval of EIR, MMRP,
and PRP
1 day Wed 5/14/25 Wed 5/14/25
58 NEPA Approval and Issuance of
FONSI by Caltrans
60 days Thu 5/15/25 Wed 8/6/25
59 NOD 5 days Thu 5/15/25 Wed 5/21/25
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Qtr 3, 2023 Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Qtr 2, 2024 Qtr 3, 2024 Qtr 4, 2024 Qtr 1, 2025 Qtr 2, 2025 Qtr 3, 2025
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mariposa Road Precise Road Plan Project
Fri 4/28/23 2 of 2
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT 1
1838
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E Page 28 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1840
EXHIBIT E Page 29 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1841
EXHIBIT E Page 30 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1842
EXHIBIT E Page 31 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1843
EXHIBIT E Page 32 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1844
EXHIBIT E Page 33 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1845
EXHIBIT E Page 34 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1846
EXHIBIT E Page 35 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1847
EXHIBIT E Page 36 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1848
EXHIBIT E Page 37 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1849
EXHIBIT E Page 38 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1850
EXHIBIT E Page 39 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1851
EXHIBIT E Page 40 of 40 EXHIBIT 1 1852
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0712, Version: 1
ADOPT A RESOLUTION FOR THE PURCHASE OF VARIOUS POLICE VEHICLES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to:
1. Approve findings pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070 in support of an exception to the competitive bidding process.
2. Approve the use of Leveraged Purchasing Agreements through the State of California, Department of Goods and Services, Contract Nos. 1-22-23-14C and 1-22-23-10A-E for the purchase of marked and unmarked Police vehicles.
3. Authorize the City Manager to approve the requisition of purchase orders for the procurement of 71 police vehicles, not to exceed $3,130,000 under these Leveraged Purchasing Agreements.
4. Appropriate funds in the amount of $3,130,000 from the Fleet Internal Service Fund Balance to the operating Fleet Internal Service Fund Fiscal Year 2023-24 Equipment Acquisition account.
It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.
Summary
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 replacement budget for the Fleet Internal Service Fund (ISF) account included funding to replace 25 vehicles utilized by the Police Department. The multi-class vehicle purchases commenced in FY 2022-23 but were not completed due to manufacturer supply chain issues and lack of bid responses. Funding was returned to the ISF fund balance at fiscal year-end.
To complete prior FY 2022-23 and current FY 2023-24 purchases, 25 vehicles and 46 vehicles, respectively, staff recommends using Leveraged Purchasing Agreements through the State of California, Department of Goods and Services, Contract Nos. 1-22-23-14C and 1-22-23-10A-E.
Use of the Leveraged Purchasing Agreements will provide increased opportunities to be more competitive in replacing the 71 marked and unmarked vehicles (Attachment A) for the Police Department.
Staff also recommends appropriating funds in the amount of $3,130,000 from the Fleet ISF fund balance to the Fleet ISF Fiscal Year 2023-24 Equipment Acquisition account 4530-718-800004- 500-000-00-45 to complete these purchases.
City of Stockton Page 1 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1853
File #: 23-0712, Version: 1
DISCUSSION
Background
The FY 2022-23 replacement budget for the Fleet ISF Equipment Acquisition account included funding to replace 25 vehicles utilized by the Police Department. The City’s replacement criteria for sedans, vans, and trucks, based on industry standards for performance and efficiency, is 10 years or 100,000 miles. Police Interceptors and other marked patrol replacement criteria is six years or 100,000 miles. Adherence to this standard replaces equipment before routine failures and breakdowns are experienced, reducing the demand for extensive mechanical repairs. The replacement standard increases the resources available for preventative maintenance and is critical to the availability and performance of all fleet equipment, which includes all public safety and emergency response vehicles.
In FY 2022-23 many vehicle manufacturers were still experiencing delays from the COVID pandemic in parts supply chains which resulted in shortened purchasing windows for buyers. This resulted in ordering banks for government agencies being extremely short and challenging to complete given the government procurement process and competitive purchasing market. The multi-class vehicle purchases commenced in FY 2022-23 but were not completed due to manufacturer supply chain issues and lack of bid responses. Funding was returned to the ISF fund balance at fiscal year-end.
In addition to the needed FY 2022-23 replacements, Public Works fleet staff have identified an additional 46 units in service among various divisions within the Police Department that exceed the age and/or mileage criteria, have recurring mechanical or operational problems, and/or are nonoperational due to a motor vehicle accident. A total of 71 units (Attachment A) is recommended for replacement.
Present Situation
Vehicle manufacturers have not completely caught up with parts supply chain shortages caused by the COVID pandemic. These shortages have caused less vehicles to be manufactured, resulting in reduced timelines in which vehicles can be purchased.
Most local dealerships are reluctant to bid on vehicles because of the shortened ordering timeline and dealers’ inability to honor quoted pricing. These shortened windows do not lend well to our traditional procurement process of posting bids and going with the lowest responsive bidder. To increase opportunities to acquire fleet within the constrained purchasing windows, staff is requesting the use of competitively bid State Contracts and City Manager authorization to approve purchase orders for the acquisition of 71 vehicles. Public Works staff anticipates an ordering window will be available in fall 2023.
With the appropriation of $3,130,000 from the Fleet Internal Service Fund, there will be sufficient funding to complete the purchase of 71 marked and unmarked vehicles to be utilized by the Police Department. All 71 vehicles identified for replacement will be sold at auction.
City of Stockton Page 2 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1854
File #: 23-0712, Version: 1
Findings
Pursuant to SMC section 3.68.070, Council may approve findings which support an exception to the competitive bidding process. For the recommended acquisitions of marked and unmarked police vehicles utilizing Leveraged Purchasing Agreements through the State of California, these findings include:
1. The State of California, Department of Goods and Services, established Leveraged Purchasing Agreements with vendors that can provide interceptor utilities and various unmarked vehicles for the Police Department.
2. These Purchasing Agreements were established pursuant to a formal competitive bidding process conducted by the State of California, Department of Goods and Services, on behalf of its governmental members, of which the City is one.
3. Taking advantage of the Leveraged Purchasing Agreements negotiated by the State of California will save the administrative expense of City staff conducting separate procurements.
4. Taking advantage of the Leveraged Purchasing Agreements will allow the City to be more competitive in purchasing vehicles in current industry conditions.
5. The specifications for the replacement equipment available through the State of California’s contract meets the City’s requirements for their equipment type.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Staff recommends appropriating funds from the Fleet Internal Service Fund Balance to the operating Fleet Internal Service Fund Fiscal Year 2023-24 Equipment Acquisition account as follows:
Amount: $3,130,000
From: Fleet ISF Fund Balance To: 4530-718-800004-500-000-00-45 With the appropriation of funds in the amount of $3,130,000, there will be sufficient funding available in the Fleet ISF Equipment Acquisition Fund Account (4530-718-800004-500-000) for the purchase of 71 marked and unmarked police vehicles.
Below is a per vehicle cost estimate by vehicle type. This estimate includes base pricing based on last year’s vehicle pricing with an estimated 1.5 percent average model year price increase:
Class/ Type Unit Cost Qty Ext Cost
Ford Interceptor $50,000 29 $1,450,000
Unmarked Sedans $40,000 42 $1,680,000
Total 71 $3,130,000
City of Stockton Page 3 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1855
File #: 23-0712, Version: 1
There is no impact to the City’s General Fund or any other unrestricted fund because of taking the recommended actions.
Attachment A - Vehicle Replacement List
City of Stockton Page 4 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1856
SCHEDULED REPLACEMENT OF VARIOUS POLICE VEHICLES
Sedans and Interceptors
No. Classification Unit # Year Make Description Mileage 1 SEDAN 3862 2010 CHEVROLET IMPALA 203,817
2 SEDAN 3826 2008 FORD FUSION 192,444
3 SEDAN 3806 2006 HYUNDAI SONATA 186,087
4 SEDAN 3873 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY 185,761
5 SEDAN 3903 2012 CHEVROLET IMPALA 179,724
6 SEDAN 3825 2008 FORD FUSION 173,562
7 SEDAN 3985 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 169,797
8 SEDAN 3902 2012 CHEVROLET IMPALA 167,727
9 SEDAN 3866 2010 CHEVROLET IMPALA 156,231
10 SEDAN 4055 2014 NISSAN ALTIMA 151,696
11 SEDAN 3506 2000 CHEVROLET MONTE CARLO 147,244
12 SEDAN 3904 2012 FORD TAURUS 143,394
13 SEDAN 3849 2010 CHEVROLET IMPALA 143,081
14 SEDAN 3867 2010 CHEVROLET IMPALA 140,760
15 SEDAN 3893 2013 FORD TAURUS 134,660
16 SEDAN 3865 2010 CHEVROLET IMPALA 134,511
17 SEDAN 3980 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 128,747
18 SEDAN 4208 2017 FORD TAURUS 127,925
19 SEDAN 3987 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 122,839
20 SEDAN 3772 2005 FORD TAURUS 117,780
21 SEDAN 3964 2014 CHEVROLET IMPALA 108,554
22 SEDAN 3962 2014 CHEVROLET IMPALA 105,369
23 SEDAN 3868 2010 CHEVROLET IMPALA 103,555
24 SEDAN 3077 1991 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 102,895
25 SEDAN 4070 2016 CHEVROLET IMPALA 102,564
26 SEDAN 4083 2016 CHEVROLET IMPALA 101,654
27 SEDAN 3982 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 101,387
28 SEDAN 4216 2017 FORD TAURUS 101,286
29 SEDAN 3899 2012 FORD FUSION 100,888
30 SEDAN 4224 2017 FORD TAURUS 100,306
31 SEDAN 4084 2016 CHEVROLET IMPALA 97,432
32 SEDAN 4223 2017 FORD TAURUS 95,682
33 SEDAN 3977 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 93,837
34 SEDAN 3990 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 92,471
35 SEDAN 3981 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 90,702
36 SEDAN 3967 2014 CHEVROLET IMPALA 82,749
37 SEDAN 3956 2014 FORD TAURUS 82,616
38 SEDAN 3978 2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 81,219
39 SEDAN 3727 2004 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 79,827
40 SEDAN 3955 2014 FORD TAURUS 78,790
41 SEDAN 3896 2013 FORD TAURUS 69,061
42 SEDAN TBD TBD TBD TBD ‐‐‐
ATTACHMENT A 1857
SCHEDULED REPLACEMENT OF VARIOUS POLICE VEHICLES
Sedans and Interceptors
No. Classification Unit # Year Make Description Mileage 1SUV‐M 4176 2017 FORD PI UTILITY 547,810
2SUV‐M 3957 2014 FORD PI UTILITY 215,145
3SUV‐M 4145 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 163,447
4SUV‐M 4116 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 143,096
5SUV‐M 4118 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 124,664
6SUV‐M 4110 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 122,019
7SUV‐M 4101 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 121,770
8SUV‐M 4180 2017 FORD PI UTILITY 116,520
9SUV‐M 3910 2014 FORD PI UTILITY 116,237
10 SUV‐M 4146 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 115,947
11 SUV‐M 4003 2015 FORD PI UTILITY 114,429
12 SUV‐M 4119 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 114,326
13 SUV‐M 4036 2015 FORD PI UTILITY 113,695
14 SUV‐M 4015 2015 FORD PI UTILITY 111,461
15 SUV‐M 4124 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 107,531
16 SUV‐M 4112 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 107,382
17 SUV‐M 4203 2017 FORD PI UTILITY 106,736
18 SUV‐M 4102 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 106,192
19 SUV‐M 3921 2014 FORD PI UTILITY 106,018
20 SUV‐M 4001 2015 FORD PI UTILITY 104,336
21 SUV‐M 3920 2014 FORD PI UTILITY 104,180
22 SUV‐M 4142 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 103,695
23 SUV‐M 4108 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 103,503
24 SUV‐M 4096 2016 FORD PI UTILITY 102,780
25 SUV‐M 3932 2014 FORD PI UTILITY 102,564
26 SUV‐M 4047 2015 FORD PI UTILITY 102,094
27 SUV‐M TBD TBD TBD TBD ‐‐‐
28 SUV‐M TBD TBD TBD TBD ‐‐‐
29 SUV‐M TBD TBD TBD TBD ‐‐‐
ATTACHMENT A 1858
Resolution No.
STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS AND THE USE OF LEVERAGED
PURCHASING AGREEMENTS THROUGH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE
PURCHASE OF VARIOUS POLICE VEHICLES
The State of California Department of Goods and Services (DGS) serves the public by providing a variety of services to State agencies through procurement and acquisition solutions. The use of these contracts is optional and is available to California State and local government agencies; and
The State has contracts with various dealerships for preferential pricing on many makes and models of vehicles. The specifications for the units available through the State contract meet the City’s requirements for the requested vehicle types; and The Leveraged Purchasing Agreements include multiple vendors and were established pursuant to a formal competitive bidding process conducted by The State of California DGS on behalf of its governmental members, of which the City is one; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby approves the following findings in support of granting an exception to the competitive bid process pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code section 3.68.070:
a. The State of California DGS established Leveraged Purchasing Agreements with vendors that can provide interceptor utilities and various unmarked vehicles for the Police Department.
b. These Purchasing Agreements were established pursuant to a formal competitive bidding process conducted by the State of California, DGS, on behalf of its governmental members, of which the City is one. c. Taking advantage of the Leveraged Purchasing Agreements negotiated by the State of California will save the administrative expense of City staff conducting separate procurements.
d. Taking advantage of the Leveraged Purchasing Agreements will allow the City to be more competitive in purchasing vehicles in current industry conditions.
1859
e. The specifications for the replacement equipment available through the State of California contracts meet the City’s requirements for their equipment type.
2. The City Council hereby authorizes the use of Leveraged Purchasing Agreements through the State of California, Department of Goods and Services, Contract Nos. 1-22-23-14C and 1-22-23-10A-E, for the purchase of marked and unmarked Police vehicles, a copy of which are attached as Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2, respectively, and are incorporated by this reference.
3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to approve the requisition of purchase orders for the procurement of 71 police vehicles, not to exceed $3,130,000 under these Leveraged Purchase Agreements.
4. The City Council hereby authorizes the appropriation $3,130,000 from the Fleet Internal Service Fund balance to the operating Fleet Internal Service Fund Fiscal Year 2023-24 Equipment Acquisition account.
5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED August 22, 2023 .
KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:
ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1860
EXHIBIT 1 1861
EXHIBIT 1 1862
Department of General Services
Procurement Division
707 Third Street, 2nd Floor
West Sacramento, CA 95605-2811
State of California
STATEWIDE CONTRACT
USER INSTRUCTIONS All changes to most recent Supplem ent are in bold red italic. Additi ons ar e enclosed in asterisks, *, and deleti ons are enclosed in br ackets, [].
MANDATORY
*Supplement 1*
ISSUE AND EFFECTIVE DATE: *9/2/2022*
CONTRACT NUMBER: 1-22-23-14C
DESCRIPTION: Enforcement Vehicles, Police Pursuit
(Ford Explorer V6 AWD)
(Ford Explorer V6 AWD - HEV)
CONTRACTOR: Folsom Lake Ford
CONTRACT TERM: 5/11/2022 through 5/10/2025
STATE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR: Rudolph Jimenez
(279) 946-8312
[email protected]
The contract user instructions, products, and pricing are included herein. All purchase documents issued under this contract incorporate the contract terms and applicable California General Provisions:
Non-IT General Provisions, rev 06/08/2010
(https://www.dgs.ca.gov/-/media/DD14F21678F64EBFADBC227F2C517C79.ashx) Cal eProcure link: www.caleprocure.ca.gov
ORDER PLACEMENT INFORMATION
Mailing Address:
Folsom Lake Ford
12755 Folsom Blvd.
Folsom, CA 95630
Fax/Email:
Fax: (916) 353-2078
Email:
[email protected]
Contact Information:
Folsom Lake Ford
Mark Paoli
Phone: (916) 351-4202
Email:
[email protected]
EXHIBIT 1 1863
All changes to most recent Supplement are in bold red italic. Additions are enclosed in asterisks; deletions are enclosed in brackets.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Supplement
Number Description/Articles Supplement
Date
*1* *Subject contract for Enforcement Vehicles,
Police Pursuit is hereby modified to reflect the
following changes:
• Attachment A – Contract Pricing,
Supplement 1 has been updated to
reflect a price increase.
• Effective September 9, 2022, orders for
23MY will not be accepted and 23MY
vehicles will not be available until further
notice.
Note: The cut-off date to submit orders for
23MY is close of business September 8, 2022.*
*9/2/2022*
N/A Original Contract Posted 5/11/2022
All other terms and conditions remain the same.
EXHIBIT 1 1864
EXHIBIT 1 1865
EXHIBIT 1 1866
SCOPE
The State’s contract with Folsom Lake Ford (Contractor) provides Enforcement Vehicles, Police Pursuit at contracted pricing to the State of California and local governmental agencies in accordance with the requirements of Contract # 1-22-23-14C. The Contractor shall supply the entire portfolio of products as identified in the contract and will be the primary point of contact for data collection, reporting, and distribution of Enforcement Vehicles, Police Pursuit to the State.
The contract term is for three (3) years with an option to extend the contract for two (2) additional one (1) year period or portion thereof. The terms, conditions, and prices for the contract extension option shall be by mutual agreement between the Contractor and the State. If a mutual agreement cannot be met the contract may be terminated at the end of the current contract term.
CONTRACT USAGE/RULES
A. State Departments
• The use of this contract is mandatory for all State of California departments. • State departments must adhere to all applicable State laws, regulations, policies, best practices, and purchasing authority requirements, e.g. California Codes, Code of Regulations, State Administrative Manual, Management Memos, and State Contracting Manual Volume 2, as applicable.
• Prior to placing orders against this contract, State departments must have been granted non-IT purchasing authority by the Department of General Services, Procurement Division (DGS-PD) for the use of this statewide contract. State departments that have not been granted purchasing authority by DGS-PD for the use of the State’s statewide contracts may contact DGS-PD’s Purchasing Authority Management Section by e-mail at [email protected].
• State departments must have a Department of General Services (DGS) agency billing code prior to placing orders against this contract. Ordering departments may contact their Purchasing Authority contact or their department’s fiscal office to obtain this information.
B. Local Governmental Agencies
• Local governmental agency use of this contract is optional. • Local government agencies are defined in Public Contract Code Chapter 2, Section 10298 (a) (b) and 10299 (b); this includes the California State Universities (CSU) and University of California (UC) systems, K-12 schools and community colleges empowered to expend public funds for the acquisition of products While the State makes this contract available to local governmental agencies, each local governmental agency should determine whether this contract is consistent with its procurement policies and regulations.
EXHIBIT 1 1867
• Local governmental agencies shall have the same rights and privileges as State departments under the terms of this contract. Any local governmental agencies desiring to participate shall be required to adhere to the same responsibilities as do State departments and have no authority to amend, modify or change any condition of the contract.
• A DGS issued billing code is not required for local governmental agencies to place orders against this contract.
C. Unless otherwise specified within this document, the term “ordering agencies” will refer to all State departments and/or local governmental agencies eligible to utilize this contract. Ordering and/or usage instructions exclusive to State departments or local governmental agencies shall be identified within each article.
DGS ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
A. State Departments
The DGS will bill each State department an administrative fee for use of this statewide contract. The administrative fee should NOT be included in the order total, nor remitted before an invoice is received from DGS.
Current fees are available online in the Price Book & Directory of Services (https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OFS/Price-Book) (go to Price Book Download and click on Purchasing under Procurement Division).
B. Local Governmental Agencies
For all local government agency transactions issued against the contract, the Contractor is required to remit the DGS-PD an Incentive Fee of an amount equal to
1.25 percent of the total purchase order amount excluding taxes and freight. This Incentive Fee shall not be included in the local governmental agency’s purchase price, nor invoiced or charged to the local governmental agency. All prices quoted to local governmental agencies shall reflect State contract pricing, including any and all applicable discounts, and shall include no other add-on fees.
SB/DVBE OFF-RAMP PROVISION
There is no SB/DVBE off ramp associated with this contract.
EXEMPT PURCHASES
There are no exempt purchases associated with this contract.
PROBLEM RESOLUTION/SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE
Ordering agencies and/or Contractor shall inform the State Contract Administrator of any technical or contractual difficulties encountered during contract performance in a timely manner. This includes and is not limited to informal disputes, supplier performance, EXHIBIT 1 1868
outstanding deliveries, etc. The ordering agency should include all relevant information and/or documentation (e.g., purchase documents).
CONTRACT ITEMS
All line items are listed on Attachment A – Contract Pricing.
SPECIFICATIONS
All products listed on Attachment A, Contract Pricing, conform to Attachment B1, Specifications 2310-5644, dated 9/30/2021 and Attachment B2, Specifications 2310-5712, dated 9/30/2021.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Contractor will provide office and personnel resources for responding to requests, including telephone coverage weekdays during the hours of 8:00 AM through 5:00 PM (PT).
Contact Phone Email
Customer Service Unit (916) 351-4202 [email protected]
PRODUCT SUBSTITUTIONS
Product substitution shall be in accordance with the General Provisions (rev 06/08/10), Article 16 entitled “Substitutions”.
PROMOTIONAL PRICING
During special pricing promotions, the Contractor shall offer the ordering agency the promotional pricing or the discount percentage off list, whichever is lower.
The Contractor shall notify the State Contract Administrator of all promotional pricing changes. Notification shall include at a minimum:
• Promotion start and end dates
• Models, products, and services included in the promotion • Promotional pricing
Promotional pricing shall not be cause for a permanent change in pricing. Promotional pricing shall not be cause for Contractor refresh.
Promotional items shall come with all benefits of the statewide contract terms and conditions and shall include all provisions such as warranty and delivery.
EXHIBIT 1 1869
PURCHASE EXECUTION
A. State Departments
1) Std. 65 Purchase Documents
State departments not transacting in FI$CAL must use the Purchasing Authority Purchase Order (Std. 65) for purchase execution. An electronic version of the Std. 65 is available at the Office of State Publishing web site (https://www.dgsapps.dgs.ca.gov/osp/StatewideFormsWeb/Forms.aspx) (select STD Forms).
All Purchasing Authority Purchase Orders (Std. 65) must contain the following:
• Agency Order Number (Purchase Order Number)
• Ordering Agency Name
• Agency Billing Code
• Purchasing Authority Number
• Leveraged Procurement Number (Contract Number)
• Supplier Information (Contact Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, E-mail)
• Line Item number
• Quantity
• Unit of Measure
• Commodity Code Number
• Product Description
• Unit Price
• Extension Price
2) FI$CAL Purchase Documents
State departments transacting in FI$CAL will follow the FI$CAL procurement and contracting procedures.
3) Blanket Orders
The use of blanket purchase orders against this statewide contract is not allowed.
B. Local Governmental Agencies
Local governmental agencies may use their own purchase document for purchase execution. The purchase documents must include the same data elements as listed above (Exception: Purchasing Authority Number and Billing Code which are used by State departments only).
MINIMUM ORDER
The minimum order shall be one (1) vehicle
EXHIBIT 1 1870
ORDERING PROCEDURE
Ordering agencies are to submit appropriate purchase documents directly to the Contractor via one of the following ordering methods:
• U.S. Mail
• Facsimile
• Email
The Contractor’s Order Placement Information is as follows:
ORDER PLACEMENT INFORMATION
U.S. Mail:
Folsom Lake Ford
12755 Folsom Blvd.
Folsom, CA 95630
Facsimile: (916) 353-2078
Email:
[email protected]
When using any of the ordering methods specified above, all State departments must conform to proper State procedures.
ORDER ACCEPTANCE
The Contractor shall accept orders from any ordering agency. The Contractor shall not accept purchase documents for this contract that:
• Are incomplete
• Contain non-contract items
• Contain non-contract terms and conditions
The Contractor must not refuse to accept orders from any ordering agency for any other reason without written authorization from the State Contract Administrator.
ORDER RECEIPT CONFIRMATION
The Contractor will provide ordering agencies with an email or facsimile order receipt confirmation within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of purchase document. The Order Receipt Confirmation shall include the following information:
• Ordering agency name
• Agency order number (purchase order number)
• Purchase order total cost
• Anticipated delivery date
EXHIBIT 1 1871
OUT OF STOCK REMEDY
Upon receipt of an order acknowledgment identifying out of stock items, the ordering agencies shall have the following options:
• Request a back order
• Cancel the item from the order with no penalty
The Contractor will provide notification to the ordering agencies regarding out-of-stock items which have been back ordered.
Under no circumstance is the Contractor permitted to make substitutions with non-contract items or unauthorized products.
DISCONTINUED ITEM REMEDY
Upon receipt of an order acknowledgment identifying discontinued items, the ordering agencies shall have the following options:
• Amend purchase document to reflect State-approved substitute item (per Article 10, Product Substitutions)
• Cancel the item from the order
Under no circumstance is the Contractor permitted to make substitutions with non-contract items or unauthorized products without approval from the State Contract Administrator.
DELIVERY SCHEDULES
Delivery for orders placed against this contract shall be in accordance with the following:
A. Pre-Delivery Checklist
Prior to delivery, each vehicle shall be completely inspected, serviced, and detailed by the delivering dealer and/or the manufacturer’s pre-delivery service center. A copy of the pre-delivery checklist shall be completed for each vehicle, signed by a representative of the organization performing the inspection/service, and delivered with the vehicle.
B. Delivery Documents
The following documents shall be delivered to the receiving agency with the vehicle:
• Completed and signed pre-delivery service checklist, including the order number and Vehicle Identification Number (VIN)
• “Line Set Tickets” or “Window Sticker” showing all options installed • One (1) copy of the vehicle warranty
• One (1) Owner’s Manual
• Speed Calibration documentation for each vehicle
EXHIBIT 1 1872
C. Locations
Deliveries are to be made (statewide) to the location specified on the individual purchase order, which may include, but not limited to inside garages and parking lots.
D. Schedule
Delivery made to any State department is to begin within ninety (90) days after receipt of order (ARO). State departments may limit delivery to a maximum of ten (10) units per working day.
Delivery to local agencies is to be completed in full within 150 days ARO.
Since receiving hours for each ordering agency will vary by facility, it will be the Contractor’s responsibility to check with each facility for their specific delivery hours before delivery occurs. The Contractor must notify the ordering agency within twelve (12) hours of scheduled delivery time, if delivery cannot be made within the time frame specified on the Order Confirmation.
Contractor is requested to make deliveries in Los Angeles County, Orange County, San Bernardino Metropolitan Area, and San Diego Metropolitan Area during off-peak hours. Off-peak hours are Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
E. Security Requirements
Deliveries may be made to locations inside secure grounds that require prior clearances or special entry procedures for delivery drivers.
Security procedures may vary from facility to facility. The Contractor will be responsible for contacting the secure location for security procedures, hours of operation for deliveries and service, dress code, and other rules of delivery.
Deliveries that are delayed due to drivers not being cleared to enter secure grounds may be cause for contract default.
FREE ON BOARD (F.O.B.) DESTINATION
All prices offered shall be F.O.B. destination; freight prepaid by the Contractor, to the ordering agency’s receiving point. Responsibility and liability for loss or damage for all orders shall remain with the Contractor until final inspection and acceptance, when all responsibility shall pass to the ordering agency, except the responsibility for latent defects, fraud, and the warranty obligations.
The Contractor will be required to deliver vehicles to State agencies or local agencies FOB Destination, Sacramento County. Additionally, delivery shall be FOB Destination to the California Highway Patrol (CHP), Fleet Operations, 3300 Reed Ave., West Sacramento, California 95605.
EXHIBIT 1 1873
Vehicles shall be delivered from the factory to the Contractor’s place of business. If the purchase order indicates delivery outside an FOB point, the Contractor and agency will negotiate for delivery beyond the FOB point. This delivery may be subject to an additional delivery charge by the resulting contractor(s). This charge shall be shown as a separate item on the purchase order and invoice.
State agencies requesting delivery outside the FOB area must contact the Transportation Management Unit for freight rate comparisons if the Contractor is delivering the vehicle.
These delivery instructions will be provided on the purchase order. Contractors receiving a purchase order without specific transportation instructions must contact the ordering agency.
Caravan or drive-away method of delivery from the factory to a dealer is not acceptable.
The supplier shall insure that each vehicle reaches its delivery point with no less than five (5) gallons of fuel in the fuel tank.
Drop ship deliveries shall not be made without prior State inspection.
Vehicles delivered from a Contractor with more than 50 miles on the odometer will be charged 50 cents for each mile exceeding 50 miles. This charge shall be deducted from the order price for each vehicle delivered against each order. Vehicles delivered with more than 250 miles on the odometer will not be accepted.
SHIPPED ORDERS
All shipments shall be in accordance with the General Provisions, Article 12 entitled “Packing and Shipment”.
PACKING SLIP
A packing slip will be included with each shipment, which will include at least the following information in no particular order:
• Agency order number (purchase order number)
• Ordering agency name
• Line item description
• Quantity ordered
• Quantity included in shipment
• Any back ordered or out of stock items and availability date of unfilled and partial shipment
• Number of parcels
• Destination
• All information contained on the packing label
EXHIBIT 1 1874
PACKING LABEL
A packing label will also be included with each order shipped and include the following items, visible on the outside of the box:
• Ordering agency name
• Delivery address, unit, and/or floor
• Department and floor
• Ordering agency contact name
• Ordering agency telephone number
SAFETY DATA SHEET
The Contractor shall provide a Safety Data Sheet for product(s) subject to Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 5194, Hazard Communication. The Safety Data Sheet is to be prepared and delivered in accordance with this Section.
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
Vehicles ordered for State use will be inspected by a State Inspector at the Contractor’s place of business. Inspection by local agencies will be at the Contractor’s place of business or as otherwise agreed to by the dealer and local purchasing agency. Inspection will commence within five (5) State working days of notification that a vehicle is ready for inspection. Inspection will include: specification compliance, workmanship, appearance, proper operation of all equipment and systems, and that all documents are present. In the event deficiencies are detected, the vehicle will be rejected and the delivering Contractor will be required to make the necessary repairs, adjustments or replacements. Payment and/or the commencement of a discount period (if applicable) will not begin until the defects are corrected and the vehicle is re-inspected and accepted.
Completion of inspection or acceptance by the State Inspector shall in no way release the Contractor from satisfying the requirements of the contract, specifications, and warranty.
Deviations from the specified requirements that are detected by the inspection shall be corrected by the Contractor in an expeditious manner at no expense to the owning agency.
Inspection by local agencies will be at the dealer’s place of business or as otherwise agreed to by the dealer and local purchasing agency.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Both the State and the Contractor have assigned contract administrators as the single points of contact for problem resolution and related contract issues.
EXHIBIT 1 1875
Administrator
Information DGS-PD Folsom Lake Ford
Contact
Name:
Rudolph Jimenez Mark Paoli
Telephone: (279) 946-8312 (916) 951-4202
Facsimile: (916) 375-4613 (916) 353-2078
Email: [email protected] [email protected] Address: DGS/Procurement Division
Attn: Rudolph Jimenez
707 Third Street, 2nd Floor, MS 201
West Sacramento, CA 95605
Folsom Lake Ford
Attn: Mark Paoli
12755 Folsom Blvd.
Folsom, CA 95630
RETURN POLICY
The Contractor will accept all products for return at no cost to the ordering agency within thiry (30) calendar days of delivery, and refund the customer in full.
Products returned should be in the packaging as delivered and include all documentation.
Lost or damaged packaging materials and/or documentation shall be supplied by the Contractor. The Contractor shall not charge for these materials in excess of the Contractor’s cost or the 10 percent restocking fee, whichever is lower. The Contractor shall provide the State Contract Administrator and/or ordering agency a copy of the Contractor’s material cost, if requested, within ten (10) days of request.
All returns shall be picked up within seven (7) working days of notification. Notification is defined as notice in writing, by facsimile, or e-mail.
CREDIT POLICY
The Contractor shall offer a credit/refund for the following items:
• Items shipped in error
• Items that are returned within thirty (30) calendar days of delivery • Defective or freight-damaged items
In all cases, the ordering agency shall have the option of taking an exchange or receiving a credit, or receiving a refund.
The Contractor will be responsible for the credit or replacement of all products, including those covered by manufacturer warranties. The Contractor cannot require the ordering agency to deal directly with the manufacturer.
EXHIBIT 1 1876
RESTOCKING FEES
The Contractor will not impose a restocking fee on the ordering agency for the following situations:
• Items returned that were damaged upon receipt
• Incorrect items shipped
• Items that are returned within thirty (30) calendar days of delivery • Items that are returned, but exchanged for other items within thirty (30) calendar days Re-stocking fees for all other reasons shall be 10 percent of the value of the items to be re-stocked.
The packaging and documentation provisions in accordance with Article 27, Return Policy, shall apply to re-stocked items.
The Contractor will not be required to accept returns more than sixty (60) days after delivery. The ordering agency will be responsible for return transportation costs to the Contractor if so accepted after sixty (60) days after delivery.
INVOICING
Ordering agencies may require separate invoicing, as specified by each ordering agency.
Invoices will contain the following information:
• Contractor’s name, address and telephone number
• Leveraged Procurement Agreement Number (Contract Number) • Agency order number (purchase order number)
• Item and commodity code number
• Quantity purchased
• Contract price and extension
• State sales and/or use tax
• Prompt payment discounts/cash discounts, if applicable • Totals for each order
PAYMENT
A. Terms
Payment terms for this contract are net forty-five (45) days. Cash Discount of $500 per unit for payment within twenty (20) days. Payment will be made in accordance with the provisions of the California Prompt Payment Act, Government Code Section 927, et seq. Unless expressly exempted by statute, the Act requires State departments to pay properly submitted, undisputed invoices not more than forty-five (45) days after the date of acceptance of goods, performance of services, or receipt of an undisputed invoice, whichever is later.
EXHIBIT 1 1877
B. CAL-Card Use
Use of the CAL-Card for payment of invoices is not allowed under this statewide contract.
C. State Financial Marketplace
State departments reserve the right to select the form of payment for all procurements, be it either an outright purchase with payment rendered directly by the State, or a financing/lease-purchase or operating lease via the State Financial Marketplace (GS $Mart and/or Lease $Mart). If payment is via the financial marketplace, the Contractor will invoice the State department and the State department will approve the invoice and the selected Lender/Lessor for all product listed on the State's procurement document will pay the Contractor on behalf of the State.
D. Payee Data Record
Each State department’s accounting office must have a copy of the Contractor’s Payee Data Record (Std. 204) in order to process payments. State departments should forward a copy of the Std. 204 to their accounting offices. Without the Std. 204, payment may be unnecessarily delayed. State departments should contact the Contractor for copies of the Payee Data Record.
CALIFORNIA SELLER’S PERMIT
The California seller permit number for the Contractor is listed below. Ordering Agencies can verify that permits are currently valid at the following website: www.cdtfa.ca.gov.
State departments must adhere to the file documentation identified in the State Contracting Manual Volume 2.
Contractor Name Seller Permit #
Folsom Lake Ford 26-797640
WARRANTY
The manufacturer’s regular new vehicle warranty shall apply to all vehicles procured against the resulting contract.
The warranty shall be factory authorized and shall cover not less than 3 years/36,000-mile bumper to bumper, no charge parts and labor. All emission-related components shall be warranted in compliance with the California Air Recourses Board (CARB) and Federal requirements. Bids offering independent insurance or a statement indicating self-insurance will be deemed non-responsive and will be rejected.
This warranty shall be honored by all franchised dealers of the vehicle within the State of California. The State’s established preventative maintenance procedures and practices shall be acceptable to the manufacturer/dealers in lieu of the manufacturer’s prescribed EXHIBIT 1 1878
procedures, which may form a part of the warranty. All warranty certificates and/or cards shall be supplied with each vehicle delivered.
If an additional extended warranty is purchased, a warranty certificate, warranty card, or a statement indicating the extended warranty has been recorded with the manufacturer shall be furnished with each vehicle delivered.
Normal wear items such as tires, belts, hoses, headlamps, light bulbs, brake linings, brake discs/drums, etc. are excluded from warranty coverage. All other items not subject to normal wear or gross operator neglect and abuse, such as window, seat or wiper motors, chassis electrical switches (door, trunk lid), paint, hinges, locks, etc., shall be covered.
The State reserves the right to use re-refined lubrication oils, where available, in lieu of the virgin equivalent oils. The re-refined oils used by the State will meet all API and SAE standards and specifications as set forth by the vehicle manufacturer. The use of said oils shall in no way void or degrade the original manufacturer’s minimum 3-year/36,000-mile warranty.
The State reserves the right to use recycled content antifreeze/coolant, where available, in lieu of virgin equivalent antifreeze/coolant, in servicing its vehicles. The recycled antifreeze/coolant used by the State will meet all ASTM standards and specifications as set forth by the vehicle manufacturer. The use of said recycled antifreeze/coolant shall in no way void or degrade the original manufacturer’s minimum 3-year/ 36,000-mile warranty. “Manufacturer’s Warranty Policy and Procedures Manual” shall be made available upon customer request. The solicitation shall also require each awarded Bidder to designate by name, a responsible contact and alternate assigned for the duration of the contract, who will resolve State warranty-related claims on a priority basis.
Note: Vehicles not placed in service immediately upon receipt shall be warranted from the date the unit is placed in service. The receiving agency shall notify the dealer in writing of the actual “in-service” date.
WARRANTY REPAIR PARTS
It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to maintain an adequate stock of all regular and special parts to meet the continuing service and warranty repair parts needs of the State without undue delay. A special system shall be set up for expediting the procurement of back order items needed to repair an inoperative vehicle including a system to air freight parts at the Contractor’s expense when parts are not in stock in California parts depots.
Warranty replacement parts shall be available within three (3) working days after telephone notification.
RECYCLED CONTENT
There is no recycled content associated with this contract.
EXHIBIT 1 1879
SB/DVBE PARTICIPATION
There is no Small Business (SB) or Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise (DVBE) participation for this contract.
ATTACHMENTS
*Attachment A – Contract Pricing, Supplement 1*
Attachment B1, Specifications 2310-5644, dated 9/30/2021 Attachment B2, Specifications 2310-5712, dated 9/30/2021 EXHIBIT 1 1880
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23
45
6.
$7'''8&(
%(%'
9:;<=>?@A<==BCD 9>@BEFGDH> 9>@BEF -
(((((%(%+* 55
I
!" #$ $!$"
45
JK4
L
M
45
6. #
N) OO%&)'(
%&'()*+,, "-
O
- !
7 "-
O
5L
&(
%(%'
7
I 5P
Q>RESE:?TES@:CD UEV AH>; Q>R W>R>F Q>RESE:? 9B@> X<@Y:C A<==BCD:Z[YB?\>S %&'(),%+, !
7
'%
%(']
"
O
- 5
%&'()*+,, !
7 &(
%(%'
- 5
EXHIBIT 1 1881
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=%''>&(
%(%'
?@ABCDEFDGHCGHI JK
JKK
L>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>' "-
M
M
L>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N
M>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>% '>( !$>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>& %>(
$$
"
">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
%>'
"#
! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>& %>% "
">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>& &>(
"O" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>& &>' # "
"O" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, &>% # >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, &>& # !!!">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, &>, $$>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, &>*
P>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, &>+ !! #>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, &>Q "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>* &>R "
! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>* &>S
"
P>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>* &>'(
">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>* &>''$ ! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+ &>'% "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+ &>'&"
!$$"! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+ &>',
!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Q &>'*T"!"!!">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Q &>'+ "!"U
$!">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Q &>'Q$!">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Q &>'R$
!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Q &>'S"
!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R &>%($!#>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R &>%'!!)
"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R &>%% !!"!" #>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R &>%& "!"
"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R &>%,! "!"
"
!"PV
W>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R
&>%*
!O$ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R &>%+$" !"
"O" XYZ
N
'
M
=KZ =L>>>'(
EXHIBIT 1 1882
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=&''>&(
%(%'
?@ABCDEF G
HH
H
IHG
J
JKJ
LK
J
H
MNNOP PQMPRSQQNTPUVQJ
H
WK
X-G
YZIKH
G
=G)HG
=G[X
=
[
J
[
\>G-G
[
JHI
HH
]HH'((J
H
GK
IGHG
=K
H>[
I
-
XH
H
HK
H
KH
=
=
J
]
J X%(( I [H - '(
(((I-H - >
JI
J
K
H[G
GG -G
[
I]H[
=
J
]
J X(^ '%(^ > GJ
KK
HG KHJ
H
J
H
H
=
HG
G IH-
I
G
KH
X
GX
H[G
GG
-G
H[
IHKI_>
=
HJ
HH
-
I
\
HKH
H
[G
G
J
HG-G
HG IH =
-J]
JKJ
J
H
-
H[ HHX
J
XJG J
JKJ
LK
J
HG
HH
>
G
HH
X
GJ
H HG ]GKHK LK
X
LK
X
X=
XHK
[
GH
K
-G
H
[
GH
GK
KHK H
]HK
J
K
[
KH
LK
> `@AaEEbcCadbFbaeBMfTcghiBjklBjaghakhB
H
H
H
H
G
HKJ
G
=Gm
-
n
J
G
HH
> %>'
"#
! %>'>'
I
G
YZ> >%
"=K
H
,o
p
G
X
qY Z %>'>&
"=K
H
'&
p
G
Hq
K H
=K
HY]J
HH
H
=K
HZ %>'>,
K H
=K
H
HXH
H
I G -G
X
GG
=G
-
I
> %>'>*G
HHG J*(J
HH
H
LK
J
HG [G
H GH-G
HG=
KI
H
=
XLK
K
J
=
X-G
pH
-
qJ
%>% "
" %>%>'
X
KJ
-
=
HY
Zr''((
p
G
J
H
Hq
G
I
H
H> s@AjFCtgcCabkFuickFvFgjB
-G
H
J
[
GGHH
HHG IGJ
KK
nH p$
$K
HK
q
J
H
WJ
HG IHK
I
G
=G)HK
HK
J
=
X
-
=>
-G
HHG JG [
=J
JKJH
HwEXHIBIT 1 1883
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=,''>&(
%(%'
&>'# "
"?" &>'>'@-@
A@ B
CDE
EAF
E
G H
E
>@ -@
A@ BAE
C
@ IE
G
AA
A
A A
IE
G
@G
EE
JAEB
A@
E
E
AA A
H AA
@
AA
>!
IE
G
AA
HG@
IE
G
A@
AA
A@ AB
A > &>% # &>%>'@
=
A@ BG
EE
JAKLMNOPQLRPSRTQU
=E
A@ @-
A G
B
G
BH@G
EE
AE
A@
G
IE
G
AA
B
'>(
&>%*
$
G
"IE
G
A
@
-> &>%>%@
=
A@ BA
=
V
V
=
-@
AA
E
E C
@G
GEG
=WXYD" ZF[%\> &>& # !!!" &>&>'
E]
H
=
A@ B
A
IE
G
^_`abcdbefagebhijkklmng_obepdbefa^_`qp_o^a^p_hobhqe^rbo^_ @
'>(@
AA
> &>, $$ &>,>'@E AE HAHAGA@ BAE@A =
G
-
V C@
@
=
A
=
@
=@GB
G
E
A
E
=
A]
=> &>*
s &>*>'@E
VE
A@A@ B@
=A
H-
B > &>+!! # &>+>'@
=AHAGA@ B
IE
AAE
t
E
H>@ G
EE
A@
-
@@-
AEH
=AHAGG
A
-
HAHAG
B @G
>@
=AHAG A
=
HA@ G
@
=
GEGG
E
E
=
AA
C
@E
H AA
-
@
=
=
G
A>@
=AHAGA@ B
G
A@GH
=AHAGG
=-
H
G
>!
GEG
=
G
E
A@ BG
C
@@ -@
@-@
G
EE
JAEB
A@G]
GEG=
AA -@
C
=@
=D#
"F
E H
=
-
G
AA
BC
@
@A@
AA
> EXHIBIT 1 1884
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=*''>&(
%(%'
&>?"
&>?>'@
ABACA@ D'%)-
=
-=
E
>
F
=A@
EF@
)
A> &>?>%@-@
D
BA@ D@
@-
AEBB-
D
C
D F
@@-@
@
=
=ABAC
A
-
>@-@
D
BA@ @-C
CEC?((
G
= CA
F
@C
EE
=
H
=A
HI+JC
@A
-@
-
B>@
AF
DF
@D
AH@
D
= AA @
K(
E @
=
C
-
B> &>?>&@=
L
A@ D@@
=@A
B
=
L
A
@C
EE
MAE
G= D
@E
D @-@
D
>A@ @-C
CEC%(()C
EE> &>N"
!
&>N>'@
AC
AA
A@ DE BEC
AC
AA
OE
F
@ EH
B
AC
AA
E
A
AA
B
C
= C
E
A
H%?*P
CH
CEC>
A
CE
A@
A
D DECEADD F
=@
A
=@FB$
I$J
OE
C
> &>K
"
Q
&>K>'@D
GAA@ DF
AA
A
E
) GD
GABAC I
J>
E
F@ AA@ DOE
F
@
AD
GA>
C
A@ DA
=
A> &>'(
" &>'(>'@-@
A@ DAE
F
@
-I*JC@
=F@ A
A>!
I'J@
-I*JA@ DC@
=E )A
RF@
A
>
A A-
BA
A
D >@F@ AA@ @-AB
=
@
C
@
F
AA
=
-
@
C
A
=
C@F@
@-
>
@ AA@ DA
A
E
A
=
A>E=
EAA@ D-
F
@
>
EE
MAA
$
AAE
=
BACA@ DAE
>
AAE
-
A
A@
=@
@
AAE
C
=ABAC
A@ D
-
@-@
A
@
A
OE
C
> &>'(>%@-@
C
EE
A@ A
B
AAD
=
OE
C
C
A
@
G= -@
A
@
A
-
D
> &>'(>&
BF@ F
=@AEAA@ DS
) TB> EXHIBIT 1 1885
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=+''>&(
%(%'
&>''$ !
&>''>'?
@A@
@
A
=@?BC@
C
@@? C@
=
D
B>
@C
E
C
@
FA
> &>'% "
&>'%>'?
@? C?
-
G
=
=
@
D
?
@
=
=
-?C@-
H
?
@H
@@
@
E
@
?-?
>?=
@? C?@H
-?
@> &>'&"
!$$"!
&>'&>'?-?
@?
A@?
@G@HCCG
G
H=
IJ
FA
G
I" J
A
=CA
H
? D
=
FA
@A
G
A@ CG$-?
@K JD
K&L),+E
@H
"
-> CJ"
@K'*&)'**E
@H
"
-> J"
,,(),L(E
@H
"
-> J
"
M(+)MN(E
@H
"
-> J
"
*M')M++E
@H
"
-> J
"
'*L)'N&E
@H
"
-> =J
"
'*()'N,E
@H
"
-> ?J"
O"
N+,)M(+E
@H
"
->
J
@%+)%ME"
-> P
@&(&>LE"
-> BJHA
@KML+)L('E
@H
L&*)L,(E"
-> J
@K&(&>MN*E"
-> &>'&>%?-?
@?A
A@?
@G@HH
?
I'J
=
?
D??
C
A
FA
G
I" J
H=
IJ>? -?
A@@?
@G@H
GD
?
G@
? HC
DC
-
=
@'
$
FA
@>Q?
C
%
=
@
=
@> EXHIBIT 1 1886
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=>''?&(
%(%'
&?',
!
&?',?'@ABC@ AD
E
C
FG
@
C?$
- C
E
=C@
A
C
@-@
?@
C
C
E
C
=
B
C
=
H&&I
=AB%(I@
=@JG
@D
E
? &?',?%@G@ G CC@ A
C
DC@!
-
@
C
A CEBA
C
-
E
G
@D
A EC
G
@DDC
=AB
C
DD
E=@-@
? &?'*K"!"!!"
&?'*?'@ABC@ A
E
DD
LC= CCA M?@
G
A@
CA G@G
GA
C@ A
E
DD
LC= CCA
=@G@
?
)
B
E
C@ @G@
@G)
C@E
CA
B
A M
G@
G)
=D
CD
-
A
E@ E
DD
? &?'+ "!"N
$!" &?'+?'
CCC@ AADMBEE
=@
C
C AB@
DC
?
+(N,(C
A
@NADMBC
C
A ?@
-
LCCC@ AG
ODCA
C@ A C
=
EP
EDEE
CD
D
A
B?QRSTUVWXYWZUSYU [SYX[[RY\\]SXRS^YW_TY`X_USUa[[XYWZYUZ`\VXR_bRV\[XSUcdefgWc\ USYU[SXg[Y``SbXY]\SbUVfgZSZXRS^YW_TY`X_USUhYUUYWXgS[XRSfgWc\ [SYX^YXSUgY\YiYgW[X[_WYWZRSYXZY^YiSTVUWVX\S[[XRYWXRUSSdjk cSYU[kl &?'>$!" &?'>?'@-@
C
A
@
CC
G
ADC
G
E
CE
D
B
CCC
?@CE
C@ A
A
AD
G
@
GH%JE
C
@D
CC
E'* '((E
C
@D
@
D-@
C
G
@
@
-
E
=
CC
'?(?
=
B CE
C
C@ A
C
?mD
G
@
=CE
@
C@ AE
MDE
EDE ',(E
C
@D
@E
M
=CC@ A
E
C
=
@
GH%JE
C
@D
?@C
=
@CE
G@@
=
=
C@ ACD@
CD
D
B@
D=@D@
@ -@
?
D
BC@ A
-
G
@@D
C@ A
A A@
=
=
C BC?@A
C@ C
B@C
F
C
G@
@@CE
C
? &?'n$
!
EXHIBIT 1 1887
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=>''?&(
%(%'
&?'>?'@-@
A@ @-B
BCBD '*(( EAF@
=C
@A
$
$C
AC
-
A
? &?'G"
!
&?'G?'@
A@ E
DHC
F
@@
DEA
A FI%J
BC
AK
A
FI%J
BC
AK
A? &?%($!#
&?%(?'
D
A
)$
A
A
=@AF
@%F
@
A
A
=@
@
)$
?@ E= AAA EB
A
EC E )L+&*?@FF
@
AA@ @-
E K
F
@,>
@A
=@
)
B
?
D
AC
E
A @A
=@A
DA@
@-@
A
CC
D
A
=@
A
I
??B
CC
A@ B
BCB
A A
=@E
KA
)
@
C=@)@ AJ
A
@A
=@AABE
A$
A
? &?%'!!)
"
&?%'?'@@ @
AA@ EBC
A
@
AA
=
B
B
A@@@
E
D
BCA
@ -@
?@
AA@ E
DAA
E @A
-
? &?%% !!"!" # &?%%?'@
-
=@
A@ EA
CEE
-
D
?@
A@ EKD@C@ A
D
?!
BA A@ E
C
-@
A? &?%& "!"
"
&?%&?'@@
A@ EHC
F
@'A
%
FAA
D
A@ @-A
=
DB
BCB*? &?%,! "!"
"
!"MI
J &?%,?'
B
BCB
@-@
A@ BK-
E
CAE
B@
F
=-@
A
=
A-
@-@
NA
CAED@$NA B
=
D-@
HC
B
I
@
B
O
A
B
JP
=
C
=
-@
A
E
K)A
-
I
E
K E
=
J
AI
Q AA
A
@@J
C
A
=
I
=@
J
AB
AA
A
A
I
K
-
A
C
-J
KD A
I
AA
D
C
KJ? &?%*
!R$ EXHIBIT 1 1888
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=>''?&(
%(%'
&?%*?'@-@
A@ BCD
E
@@ E
=F
A
DACD
F
G H
IDF
E
@
A J? BH"-
AA
A
=? H
-
AA
=
F
A? H
A
=E@ ? H
A@
J@
A
?"
=
= A
K
J
FF
A BJ@F
DD
@-@
? H
F
E
A@
E
AJAF? =H D -
E
F
D
=D=A? @H'%)- E
D
F
F
? LMNOPPLQRLSTUUVWOXYPQZPY[R[VUXROX\VL]^R[VUXR\UUVQM_R^VYOR PY`YPabUVcYRRYVdZTUUVWOXYPQQ^OPPeYYROX\fOQQgORLUXOP hXQRLRiRYU[jiQRLSYkYVRL[LSORLUXPY`YPhhhfPiQRYQRQROX\OV\Qd lYQRLX]SYVRL[LSORLUXQ^OPPcYfVU`L\Y\ifUXVYmiYQRMd nH D
A
? IHD
@
A
D
@
? H
=@E
=E=B
J? FHoFoD
AJ
=@pAHE@
@
-
@ E
=D
AG q
@
-@
A
@
FoFoD
AJ
=@pAHA@
DF
DF
J?
q
A
FoFoD
AJ
=@pB@
A
EH@A@ BF
D J
DF
@A
=
A?
HrD
I
AAJ
-
sAA
A
@
E@
-
sA
BD
IBJD
=
@
A
@
? H
-
AA
=
F
B=?
-
AA
=
A
F
B=? EXHIBIT 1 1889
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$='(''>&(
%(%'
?@
A
B,@
CCD
E
F
=
A
F
= GD
CGC
HICE
DC
D
-
JCC
>
@
A
E
ECCD HE
A
GD
-
JCC
E
D FAA
-
D
E
EC
GH
=
ED
FAHID
-
> C@"
E
E==
K
C
C
CE
D> @D-D
CD ACDCGC
= FI
H
=
= -HLB
-D
AC@>
CA
B,@ FIC
HCCD HCA
D-D
>D-D
CD H FI
-
A I> A@
G
CC
DDA
B,@
CB
G
CC
CC
=
G
G
GIHGA
D
D
D
-D
CC C
=
@> -@
=D
G
AC
G
C>
G
GA
=D
C>
DG
CCD H
H
GD
-
JCC> E@
CD
E
ECCD A
= CC> L@
=D
=
E
D
=
ACE
D>
I@
F
A
=ED D
=
= C
MF?A C I
D-D
> &>%+$" !"
"N" OLD
H
'
C
=GD =I &>%+>'
-D
CCD GD E
=PQRSRTTUVWUXYYTZT[V\]QW
?A
G
CO @(+(G
C
DA
^>(C
C
CC> H '((G
C
DA
%&>(C
C
CC> @*('((G
C
DA
'_>(C
C
CC> @
C
CCD
'&(G
C
DA
E
D
C
EB%@G
C> @(+(G
C
DA
''>(C
C
CC
L
G I *
*(()+
((( -
> &>%+>%
-D
CCD HC
D E
=`Ta]YZTbcWVd]YeO EXHIBIT 1 1890
!" #$ $!$" %&'()*+,, "-( ./00/01/.23 4556789:;5<.
$=''''>&(
%(%'
?
=@"A
A
" > B CA
A
@" "A
A
)
-
"
)
DC> ?
=@
=E)AC
-A
CF)AC
-A
=E
=
$
B
G> &>%+>&
-E
AAE FE H
=IJKLMNO
DC
F
APAAQ ?RISIJKLMNOQ T C
A
FU($>
=
A
AE
V&%*> TE
AA
A
=E
H
E
AH
H
EC -
B
W
VAA
-
- > B?XYJZYM[\]YJZ^_^Z[MNOQ T -
VAA
-B
W
-
B
W> T
W
=AGAF
-
B A
=H
> T A
=C
HE W)C> FC
=H
E
EA>
EXHIBIT 1 1891
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12
34
5/
$6'''7&(
%(%'
89:;<=>?@;<<ABC 8=?ADEFCG= 8=?ADE ,
(((((%(%H* 44
I
J
K"$#)
J$
K
!" #$
$"$
34
JL3
M
K
34
5/ #
N) OO%&)'(
%&'()*+'% ,
O
, "
6 ,
O
4M
&(
%(%'
6
I 4P
Q=RDSD9>TDS?9BC UDV @G=: Q=R W=R=E Q=RDSD9> 8A?= X;?Y9B @;<<ABC9Z[YA>\=S %&'()*+'% "
6 &(
%(%'
!
O
, 4
EXHIBIT 1 1892
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<%''=&(
%(%'
>?@ABCDECFGBFGH IJ
IJJ
K========================================================================================================' ,
L
L
K========================================================================================================== M
L============================================================================================================% '=( "$==================================================================================================================& %=(
$$
=============================================&
%='
#
" ================================================================================& %=%
==================================================================================& &=(
N =============================================================================O &=' #
N =============================================================================O &=% # ==============================================================================================================O &=& # """=======================================================================================O &=O !$$====================================================================================O &=*
===========================================================================================O &=P !
Q========================================================================================================O &=+ "" #===========================================================================================* &=R
======================================================================================* &=S
" ================================================================================================* &='(
Q=============================================================================================* &=''
========================================================================================* &='%$ " ====================================================================================================P &='&
=================================================================================================P &='O
"$$" =====================================================================================P &='*
"=================================================================================================================P &='PT"""===========================================================================================P &='+ "U
$"=======================================================================+ &='R$"================================================================================================+ &='S$
"
===========================================================================================================+ &=%(
"================================================================================================================+ &=%'$"#=====================================================================================================+ &=%%"")
==================================================================================R &=%&!"""
#===========================================================================================R &=%O "
================================================================================================R &=%*" "
"QV
W==========================================R
&=%P
"N$ =======================================================================R &=%+$!"
N ================================================================'( EXHIBIT 1 1893
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<&''=&(
%(%'
>?@ABCDE F
GG
G
HGF
I
IJI
KJ
I
G
LMMN OPPQLPNRSQQMTPUVQI
G
WXH
F
Y
Z
$ J<)
XH
F
Y$
ZHJG
F
<F)GF
<F[X
<
[
I
[
\=F,F
[
IGH
GG
]GG'((I
G
FJ
HFGF
<J
G=[
H
,
XG
G
GJ
G
JG
<
<
I
]
I X%((H [G , '(
(((H,G , =
IH
I
J
G[F
FF,F
[
H
]G[
<
I
]
I X(^!'%(^!= FI
JJ
GF JGI
G
I
G
G
<
GF
F HG,
H
F
JG
X
FX
G[F
FF
,F
G[
HGJH_=
<
GI
GG
,
H
\
GJG
G
[F
F
I
GF,F
GF HG <
,I]
IJI
I
G
,
G[ GGX
I
XIF I
IJI
KJ
I
GF
GG
= F
GG
X
FI
G GF ]FJGJ KJ
X
KJ
X
X<
XGJ
[
FG
J
,F
G
[
FG
FJ
JGJ G
]GJ
I
J
[
JG
KJ
= `?@aDDbcBadbEbaeALfTcghiAjklAjaghakhA
G
G
G
G
F
GJI
F
<Fm
,
n
I
F
GG
= %='
#
" %='='
H
F
Y
Z= =%!
<J
G
op
q!
F
X
rY!
Z %='=&
<J
G
'&
q
F
Gr
J G
<J
GY]I
GG
G
<J
GZ %='=o!
J G
<J
G
GXG
G
H F ,F
X
FF
<F
,
H
= %='=*
F
GGF I*(I
GG
G
KJ
I
GF [F
G FG,F
GF<
JH
G
<
XKJ
J
I
<
X,F
qG
,
rI
%=%
%=%='
X
JI
,
<
GY
Zs''((
q
F
I
G
Gr
F
H
G
G= %=%=%
"!#
I
$
I
F
<X
<I
J<
$
F
, J
$
<
I=
EXHIBIT 1 1894
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<=''>&(
%(%'
?@ABCDEFGDHIJCKLGJCMCFBN
,O
P
Q
R
OOPP
PPO SOQ
TT
UP V$
$T
PT
W
Q
P
X
$
T
YQ
PO SPT
S
O
<O) PT
PT
Q
<
Y
,
<>
,O
PPO QO R
<Q
QTQ P
PZ &>'#
[ &>'>'O,O
PO S
R\T
TP]
T
Q Y
T
>O ,O
PO SPT
R
O ^T
Q
PP
P
P P
^T
Q
OQ
TT
UPTS
PO
T
T
PP P
Y PP
O
PP
>"
^T
Q
PP
YQO
^T
Q
PO
PP
PO PS
P > &>% # &>%>'O
<
PO SQ
TT
UP_`abcde`fdgfhei
<T
PO O,
P Q
S
Q
SYOQ
TT
PT
PO
Q
^T
Q
PP
S
'>(
&>%*
$
Q
^T
Q
P
O
,> &>%>%O
<
PO SP
<
j
j
<
,O
PP
T
T R
OQ
QTQ
<k+l\ m]n%o> &>& # """ &>&>'
Tp
Y
<
PO S
P
^T
Q
qrstuvwxyvszrstuv{ts|}~!
T
<
PP
S
O
'>(O
PP
> &>=!$$ &>=>'OT PT YPYPQPO SPTOP <
Q
,
j RO
O
<
P
<
O
<OQS
Q
T
P
T
<
Pp
<> &>*
&>*>'OS
YjPO S
Q
X
SP
Q
O,O
> &>*>%OO
<
<PYPQPO jOQ
P
<
QTQQ
T
T
<
PP
R
O
OP O
PP
> &>!
&>>'OT
jT
POPO SO
<P
Y,
S > EXHIBIT 1 1895
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<*''=&(
%(%'
&=+"" # &=+='>
<?@?A?> B
CD
??D
E
D
@=> A
DD
?>
,
>>,
?D@
<?@?AA
?
,
@?@?A
B >A
=>
<?@?A ?
<
@?> A
>
<
ADAA
D
D
<
??
F
>D
@ ??
,
>
<
<
A
?=>
<?@?A?> B
A
?>A@
<?@?AA
<,
@
A
="
ADA
<
A
D
?> BA
F
>> ,>
>,>
A
DD
G?DB
?>AH
ADA<
?? ,>
F
<>
<I#
J
D @
<
,
A
??
BF
>
>?>
??
= &=K
&=K='>
?@?A?> B'%),
<
,<
D
=
F
<?>
DF>
)
?= &=K=%>,>
B
@?> B>
>,
?D@@,
B
A
B F
>>,>
>
<
<?@?A
?
,
=>,>
B
@?> >,A
ADAK((
L
< A?
F
>A
DD
<
H
<?
HIMJA
>?
,>
,
@=
>
?F
BF
>B
?H>
B
< ?? >
N(
D >
<
A
,
@= &=K=&><
O
?> B>>
<>?
@
<
O
?
>A
DD
G?D
L< B
>D
B >,>
B
=?> >,A
ADA%(()A
DD= &=N
"
&=N='>
?A
??
?> BD @DA
?A
??
CD
F
> DH
@
?A
??
D
?
??
@
A
< A
D
?
H%+*P!
AH
ADA=
?
AD
?>
?
B BDAD?BB F
<>
?
CD
A
= &='(
Q &='(='>B
L??> BF
??
?
<
,B
L
<
D
) LB
L?@?AI
J=
D
F> ??> BCD
F
>
? B
L?=!
A
?> B?
<
?= &=''
&=''='>,>
?> B?D
F
>
,I*JA>
<F> ?
?="
I'J>
,I*J?> BA>
<D )?
EF>
?
=
?EXHIBIT 1 1896
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<=''>&(
%(%'
?,
@?
?
A >BCB ??B B,?@
<
B
D
B
C
??
<
,
B
D ?
<
DBCB
B,
> B ??B A?
<
?>E<
E??B A,
C
B
>
EE
F??
$
??E
<@?D?B A
?E
>
??E
,
?
?B
<B
B
??E
D
<?@?D
?B A
,
B,B
?
B
?
GE
D
> &>''>%B,B
D
EE
?B ?
@
??A
<
GE
D
D
?
B
H< ,B
?
B
?
,
A
> &>''>&
@CB C
<B?E??B AI
) J@> &>'%$ "
&>'%>'B
?E?
?
E
<?BHA?
A
??B A?
<
C
H>!
?A
K
A
?
GE
> &>'&
&>'&>'B
,?@?D?B A?
<
<
,BA?,
D
B
?D
??
?
K
?
,B
> &>'L
"$$"
&>'L>' ?
K
?E
??
GE
D
?>E??E A
?B C
HC
BB
<
?BB,?
?E
??
GE
D
? ?C
> &>'*
"
&>'*>'BA@?B AE
E
@,B
C
B
?>$
, ?
D
<?B
A
?
B,B
>B
?
?
D
?
<
@
?
<
M&&J
<A@%(JB
<BNC
BE
D
> &>'*>%BCB C ??B A
?
E?B"
,
B
?
A ?D@A
?
,
D
C
BE
A D?
C
BEE?
<A@
?
EE
D<B,B
> &>'=O"""
&>'=>'BA@?B A
D
EE
F?< ??A H>B
C
AB
?A CBC
CA
?B A
D
EE
F?< ??A
<BCB
>
)
@
D
?B BCB
BC)
?BD
?A
@ EXHIBIT 1 1897
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<+''=&(
%(%'
> ?
@A
@)
<B
CB
,
>
DA D
BB
= &='+ "E
$" &='+='!
CCCA >>B?FDD
<A
C
C >FA
BC
=
G(EH(C
>
AE>B?FC
C
> =A
,
ICCCA >@
JBC>
CA > C
<
DK
DBDD
CB
B
>
F=LMNOPQRSTRUPNTP VNTSVVMTWWXNSMNYTRZOT[SZPNP\VVSTRUTPU[WQSMZ]MQWVSNP^_`abR^W PNTPVNSbVT[[N]STXWN]PQabUNUSMNYTRZOT[SZPNPcTPPTRSbNVSMNabR^W VNTSYTSNPbTWTdTbRVSVZRTRUMNTSUTYTdNOQPRQSWNVVSMTRSMPNN_ef ^NTPVfg &='h$" &='h='A,A
C
>
A
CC
@
>BC
@
D
CD
B
F
CCC
=ACD
CA >
>
>B
@
A
@i%jD
C
AB
CC
D'* '((D
C
AB
A
B,A
C
@
A
A
,
D
<
CC
'=(=
<
F CD
C
CA >
C
=kB
@
A
<CD
A
CA >D
?BD
DBD 'H(D
C
AB
AD
?
<CCA >
D
C
<
A
@i%jD
C
AB
=AC
<
ACD
@AA
<
<
CA >CBA
CB
B
FA
B<ABA
A ,A
=
B
FCA >
,
@
AAB
CA >
> >A
<
<
C FC=A>
CA C
FAC
l
C
@A
AACD
C
= &='m$
"
&='m='A,A
CA A,D
DBDF '*(( >C@A
<B
AC
$
$B
CB
,
C
= &=%(
" &=%(='
A
CA >
FkB
@
AA
F>C
C?
iCj= &=%'$"# &=%'='!
F
C
)$
C
C
<AC@
A%@
A
C
C
<A
A
)$
=A >< CCC >D
C
>B > )+G&*=A@@
A
CCA A,
> ?
@
AHh
AC
<A
)
D
=
F
CB
>
C AC
<AC
FCA
A,A
C
BB
F
C
<A
C
i
==D
BB
CA D
DBD
C C
<A>
?CEXHIBIT 1 1898
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<=''>&(
%(%'
)
?
@<?)? AB
A
?A
<?AACD
A <
E
A
> &>%%"")
&>%%>'?? ?
AA? DC@
A
?
AA
<
C
C
A???
D
E
C@A
? ,?
>?
AA? D
EAA
D ?A
,
> &>%&!"""
# &>%&>'?
,
<?
A? DA
@DD
,
E
>?
A? DFE?@? A
E
>"
CA A? D
@
,?
A> &>%G "
&>%G>'?
?
A? DH@
I
?'A
%
IAA
E
A? ?,A
<
EC
C@C*> &>%*" "
"JK
B &>%*>'
C
C@C
?,?
A? CF,
D
@AD
C?
I
<,?
A
<
A,
?,?
LA
@ADE?<
ELA C
<
E,?
H@
C
K ?
C
M
A
C
BN
<
@
<
,?
A
D
F)A
,
K
D
F D
<
B
AK
O AA
A
??B
@
A
<
K
<?
B
AC
AA
A
A
K
F
,
A
@
,B
FE A
K
AA
E
@
FB> &>%P
"Q$ &>%P>'?,?
A? DH@
I
?? I
<C
A
@AH@
C
N B
F@C
I
?
A E> DB,
AA
A
<> B
,
AA
<
C
A> B
A
<I? > B!
A?
E?
A
>
<
< A
R
E
CC
A DE?C
@@
?,?
> B
C
I
A?
I
AEAC> <B!@ ,
I
C
@
<@<A> EXHIBIT 1 1899
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<=''>&(
%(%'
?@'%), A
B
C
C
> DEFGHHDIJDKLMMNOGPQHIRHQSJSNMPJGPTNDUVJSNMPJTMMNIEWJVNQGJ HQXQHYZMN[QJJQNRLMMNOGPQHIIVGHH\QQJGPT]GII^GJDMPGH _PIJDJ`JQMSa`IJDKQbQNJDSDKGJDMPHQXQH___]H`IJQIJIJGPTGNTIc dQIJDPUKQNJDSDKGJDMPIVGHH[Q]NMXDTQT`]MPNQe`QIJEc f@ B
g
> h@B
?
g
B
?
> @
<?A
<A<i
j> C@kCkB
gj
<?lg@A?
?
,
? A
<B
gm n ?
,?
g
?
CkCkB
gj
<?lg@g?
BC
BC
j>
n
g
CkCkB
gj
<?li?
g
A@?g? iC
B j
BC
?g
<
g>
@oB
h
ggj
,
pgg
g
?
A?
,
pg
iB
hijB
<
?
g
?
> @
,
gg
<
C
i<>
,
gg
<
g
C
i<> q@
B
lr@
gg?
A
h
<
B
h
< C?
gCg
ijgA
?g
?
,
pgg
>
@
B
A
Agg? iA
B
C?
,
pgg
A
? hBB
,
?
A
Ag
Ci
<
A?
hBij?
,
> g@
A
A<<
k
g
g
gA
?> @?,?
g? Bg?gCg
< hj
i
<
< ,isl
,?
Bg@>
gB
lr@ hjg
igg? igB
?,?
>?,?
g? ihj
,
B j> B@
C
gg
??B
lr@
gl
C
gg
gg
<
C
C
CjiCB
?
?
?
,?
gg g
<
@> EXHIBIT 1 1900
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<'(''=&(
%(%'
,>
<?
@
AB
@
B=
@
@A
<?
B=
?@
BB? C
C
@?
,
DBB= E>
B?
E
EBB? A
< BB= F>
<?
<
E
?
<
ABE
?=
G>
H
A
<E? ?
<
< B
IHJA B G
?,?
= &=%+$!"
K &=%+='
,?
B@ABBB?BB
? B,
B
?
"!
#
@
$
@
?
<G
<@
A<
$
?
, A
$
<
@LBF?
C
&
B
<@? <G>= &=%+=%
,?
BB? @? E
<MNOPOQQRSTRUVVQWQXSYZNT
JA
@
B[ >(\(@
B
?A
]=(B
B
BB= C ^( B
?A
'*=(B
B
BB= >('((@
B
?A
%&=(B
B
BB= >
B
BB?
'&(@
B
?A
E
?
B
EL%>@
B= &=%+=&
,?
BB? CB
? E
<_Q`ZVWQabTScZVd[ >
<eB
B
! = C AB
B
e B
B
!
)
,
)
JA= >
<e
<?)BA
,B
A@)BA
,B
<?
<
$
C
G= &=%+=f
,?
BB? @? E
<gXShZTi
JA
@
BjBB[ >UgPgXShZTi[ k!A
B
@\($=
<
B
B?
F 'f(= k
?
BB
B
<?
E
?
BE
E
?A ,
C
H
FBB
,
, = EXHIBIT 1 1901
!" #$
$"$ %&'()*+'%
,( -.//./0.-12 34456789:4;/
$<''''=&(
%(%'
>?@ABCADEFGABCHIHCEDJKL M ,
NOO
,>
P
,
>
P= M
P
<OQOR
,
> O
<S
= M O
<T
SU P)T= RT
<S
U
UO=
EXHIBIT 1 1902
EXHIBIT 2 1903
EXHIBIT 2 1904
EXHIBIT 2 1905
EXHIBIT 2 1906
EXHIBIT 2 1907
EXHIBIT 2 1908
EXHIBIT 2 1909
EXHIBIT 2 1910
EXHIBIT 2 1911
EXHIBIT 2 1912
EXHIBIT 2 1913
EXHIBIT 2 1914
EXHIBIT 2 1915
EXHIBIT 2 1916
EXHIBIT 2 1917
EXHIBIT 2 1918
EXHIBIT 2 1919
EXHIBIT 2 1920
EXHIBIT 2 1921
EXHIBIT 2 1922
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 23-0657, Version: 1
APPROVE THE 2023 VAN BUSKIRK MASTER PLAN AND 2023 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND
ECOSYSTEM VALUES OF THE VAN BUSKIRK GOLF COURSE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council by motion:
1. Accept the 2023 Van Buskirk Master Plan for the rehabilitation and reuse of the Van Buskirk Golf Course;
2. Accept the 2023 Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values of the Van Buskirk Golf Course; and
3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to take necessary and appropriate actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this motion.
Summary
The Community Services Department worked with Design Workshop Inc., other consultants, stakeholders, and community members to develop a Master Plan for rehabilitating and reusing the former Van Buskirk Golf Course property (“Project”). This property is adjacent to the Van Buskirk Community Center and Park and is deed restricted for recreation. From 2018 through 2022, public engagement and feedback established three site design alternatives. Virtual, in-person, and online surveys provided community and youth engagement, focusing primarily on identifying priority activities and programming interests within the three design options. In May 2022, a draft master plan design was presented to City Council. City Council comments and additional community engagement provided the final design plan. The Master Plan Design and engagement process was approved on January 24, 2023. This approved design was used to finalize the Biological Resources document and apply for funding.
The 2023 Van Buskirk Master Plan (Attachment A) includes opportunities for flood protection, passive and active recreation facilities, programs, and activities. It will be used to pursue funding opportunities for a phased approach to the project. The 2023 Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values of the Van Buskirk Golf Course (Attachment B) is a support document for the Master Plan. It provides information relevant to possible future permitting or mitigation activities required for federal or state laws that meet rehabilitation and reuse objectives. Staff recommends the acceptance of the proposed Master Plan and Proposed 2023 Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values of the Van Buskirk Golf Course.
City of Stockton Page 1 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1923
File #: 23-0657, Version: 1
DISCUSSION
Background
Van Buskirk Golf Course is a 192-acre parcel at 1740 Houston Avenue. The property deeded to the City in 1957 by Charles and Bertha Van Buskirk includes the Van Buskirk Golf Course, Community Center, park, and ballfields. A deed restriction limits use to “public recreation or public park purpose.” The deed also identifies that the property would revert to the donor’s heirs if the City became noncompliant with respect to those restricted uses. The Van Buskirk heirs expressed their continued support for recreational purposes and possible educational opportunities.
The current park site at the Van Buskirk Community Center includes an ADA-accessible playground, basketball court, baseball fields, ball/handball court, tennis courts, soccer fields, and a passive recreation area with space for picnics and small gatherings. The Community Center provides a fitness room, meeting rooms, classrooms, an indoor gym/basketball court, and a micro-library. This location is occasionally used for a warming center/ emergency shelter when dangerous inclement weather is forecasted.
In late 2018, The City began public engagement as part of an application for a Proposition 2018 grant to renovate the Van Buskirk property. In August 2019, operations ceased after the Kemper Sports Management Agreement terminated for the Van Buskirk Golf Course. The City has since provided security services, landscape maintenance, improved emergency vehicle access, tree management, and police patrols. A strategic plan for property reuse Request for Proposals was released, and a contract was awarded to Design Workshop in 2020. California Conservation Corps Delta Center applied for and received Prop 68 funding to remove clear brush along the fence line, create walking trails, and remove dead, dying, and fallen trees. The City applied for but was not awarded a Prop 68 Grant for the Project. The Prop 68 community engagement provided a foundation for future activities, and identified the need and benefit of a strategic reuse and design plan to guide the planning process, development of partnerships, and identification of potential funding sources for this facility.
Design Workshop, with City staff, began efforts to coordinate and host a variety of outreach efforts to solicit participation and gather feedback from the community. An update on efforts to produce a draft Van Buskirk Park Master Plan Design was presented to City Council on May 24, 2022, for City Council review.
On May 23, 2023, the community engagement process and the proposed design were presented for City Council review and concurrence. The final design concept highlighted basketball courts, a skate park, bike trails, a BMX track, a community garden, improved parking, a splash pad/water play area, lawn and fields, disc golf, space for golf training and academy, pickle ball courts, a dog park, adventure playground, outdoor education center, and event lawn/area for group picnics. Acreage on the western portion of the property is set aside as passive recreational space to be considered in support of potential flood control and wetland mitigation efforts related to the Lower San Joaquin River Levee Improvement Project, under consideration by US Army Corps of Engineers, San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency (SJAFCA), and American Rivers. The Council approved the Master Plan Design and directed staff to use the design plan to promote the project, apply for funding, and finalize the environmental documents required for a final Master Plan. City Council requested that the Final Master Plan be presented in the fall of 2023.
City of Stockton Page 2 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1924
File #: 23-0657, Version: 1
Present Situation
The Proposed Van Buskirk Park Master Plan and the Proposed Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values of the Van Buskirk Golf Course are attached to the staff report for City Council Review and Acceptance.
The Master Plan highlights the Project background and history, provides a context for the community adjacent to the park, identifies opportunities for repurposing and improving the areas, and identifies constraints that must be addressed in the design process.
The Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values of Van Buskirk Report provides necessary environmental information that the City must consider as it moves forward to meet federal or state funding requirements, as well as applicable laws and regulations related to the reuse objectives and activities.
Master Plan
The engagement process extended across several years and included both virtual and in-person opportunities to establish a dialogue about programming and design opportunities, provide structured feedback and open-ended comments about preferences, and allow community members to learn about the potential uses of the property for flood control, wetland and habitat mitigation, and possible future flood mitigation.
The three alternatives were summarized by highlighting the key elements that are shared and different, with attention to the value of the preferred alternative. The importance of a potential shared place in the Project for the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the San Joaquin County Flood Control Agency was presented. Restore the Delta, a grassroots agency, also developed and carried out an additional survey during community engagement. The City survey results were highlighted in graphs in the Master Plan.
The proposed Master Plan incorporates several design features: a neighborhood connector along Houston, water play, golf academy, skate park, BMX track and trail, pickleball and basketball courts, a dog park, playground, trails, open parkland, and public spaces for community events. The Master Plan prioritizes safety and highlights programming and amenities that are diverse and inclusive for residents of all ages.
The Plan explains how the project could be phased and how projects will be prioritized. Permitting, infrastructure, and offsite improvements, such as traffic mitigation, are briefly covered. This Plan focuses on long and short-term funding through grants, public-private partnerships, and jurisdictional partnerships with federal, County, School Districts, nonprofits, and environmental advocacy organizations.
Biological Resources and Ecosystem Report
The environmental report, 2023 Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values of the Van Buskirk Golf Course, is an assessment and evaluation of the Van Buskirk Park’s biological resources that are relevant to permitting and mitigation required by state and federal laws. The report will support City of Stockton Page 3 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1925
File #: 23-0657, Version: 1
CEQA analysis and documents required for future actions, and describes the value of the current ecosystem with a focus on risks and opportunities for mitigation and restoration. The report also makes recommendations about the future management of biological resources. A summary of flood risk, opportunities to address climate change, and carbon sequestration is included.
It is recommended that the City Council accept by motion the 2023 Van Buskirk Master Plan Design and the related environmental report- 2023 Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values of the Van Buskirk Golf Course
Financial Summary
There is no impact on the City’s General Fund or any other unrestricted fund from this action.
Attachment A - 2023 Van Buskirk Master Plan
Attachment B - 2023 Biological Resources and Ecosystem Values City of Stockton Page 4 of 4 Printed on 8/17/2023
powered by Legistar™
1926
August 4, 2023
City of Stockton
Prepared for
VAN BUSKIRK PARK MASTER PLAN
DRAFT
ATTACHMENT A 1927
ATTACHMENT A 1928
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Project Background & History 2
Context 3
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Engagement Summary 6
Survey Highlights 8
ALTERNATIVES & COLLABORATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Alternatives 12
Preferred Alternative 15
Agency Collaboration 16
MASTER PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Master Plan Concept 20
IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Phasing 28
Implementation 30
APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Public Outreach Results 34
Cost Opinion 48
ATTACHMENT A 1929
1 ATTACHMENT A 1930
INTRODUCTION
| 1
ATTACHMENT A 1931
PROJECT BACKGROUND & HISTORY
1961
1969
1970
2011
2017
2018
01/2019
08/2019
08/2019
Van Buskirk Golf Course, designed by Larry
Nordstrom, opens on approximately 214 acres
given to the City of Stockton by the Van Buskirk
family. The course starts out as a nine-hole layout
on flat land, making it easy to walk.
For almost 60 years the Van Buskirk Golf Course provided the opportunity for residents and visitors to learn, practice and play the sport of golf. Over the years it hosted numerous tournaments as well as provided a venue for Edison High School to use as a home course for competition. Since the early 2000’s, golf as an industry, has experienced a decline in interest and revenue to support operations resulting in limited number of new courses being constructed and courses closing around the country. Van Buskirk Golf Course, like many other courses was affected by the declining interest in golf. Throughout the 2010’s the City was subsidizing the operations of both the Van Buskirk and Swenson golf courses and made the difficult decision to close the Van Buskirk course. Despite the closure, many fond memories and experiences remain for those who played the course. The following is a brief history of the course, the relationship to the Swensen Golf Couse and the repurposing of the golf course as a multiuse park for residents.
Nine holes are added to change Van Buskirk into
a traditional, 18-hole, par-72, championship golf
course that plays 6,502 yards from the white tees.
The new nine holes compose the front-nine and
the original nine holes become the back-nine. Stockton Mayor Michael Tubbs said Swenson Park had the potential to become a mixeduse development, prompting a grassroots movement to raise awareness of the park,
“Friends of Swenson”. The group organized a
farmers market, summer concerts, and car shows,
and a restaurant opened to show the City the
community could enjoy the site as is.
Residents meet at Van Buskirk Community Center
to share ideas on how to repurpose the golf
course. Suggestions include nature trails, a public
park, soccer fields, a university and a skating rink.
Van Buskirk Golf Course
closes.
The new starter house and pro shop opens.
KemperSports manages both City courses, Van
Buskirk and Swenson. Golf’s declining popularity
has increased City subsidies from $450,000 in
2015 to $850,000 in 2017.
Vandals repeated acts damage the course,
especially the greens, forcing closure of the backnine.
The City Council unanimously approves a plan
to keep Swenson Park Golf Course open for
the foreseeable future but closes Van Buskirk
Golf Course on August 31. The City turns over
control of Swenson golf course to KemperSports
Management for the next 15 years.
2 |
ATTACHMENT A 1932
Chart Title
white black native asian pacific islander hispanic multi Chart Title
1 2 3
CONTEXT
27% children
14 under
64% adults
15 to 64
9% seniors 65+
AGE DISTRIBUTION (2021)
0.5%
native
american
7% white
0.5%
pacific
islander
6% 2+ races
COMMUNITY DIVERSITY (2021)
14%
asian
17%
black
55%
hispanic
and others
MEDIAN
$84,097
PER CAPITA
$41,276
MEDIAN
$42,604
PER CAPITA
$16,435
STATE VS LOCAL INCOME
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY
MEDIAN AGE
26.6 YEARS 3.5
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
COMMUNITY POPULATION & HOUSING
COMMUNITY
The community of south Stockton has a higher
diversity and is younger when compared to
the general population of California. Many
barriers make it challenging for residents to
access parks. 72% of Stockton residents live in
areas with less than 3 acres of parks or open
space per 1,000 residents, a standard used
by Parks for Californians. 55% of residents in
Conway and other neighborhoods adjacent
to Van Buskirk do not have access to a vehicle.
These existing circumstances as well as the
physical barriers; Interstate 5, State Route 4,
and the French Camp Slough, make it more
challenging for the community to access Van
Buskirk Park and other open spaces. Based on
community engagement response residents
of the surrounding neighborhoods are
invested in improving the park. Interest shown
was associated with establishing new facilities
adjacent to the existing community center and
the benefits that the new park will provide for
their community.
OPPORTUNITIES
The Van Buskirk site is a relatively blank canvas
for repurposing and improving the area
to provide a variety of recreation uses and
facilities currently unavailable in this area. At
approximately 192 acres, this is the largest
park site in the City of Stockton. The site is
primarily flat and is within walking distance
from the Conway, Terranova and Willow
Park neighborhoods and several schools for
recreational and educational opportunities.
The eastern portion of Van Buskirk Park,
including the community center, are well
used by the residents and have a variety of
recreational and educational uses as well as
after school activities. There is opportunity
to expand and propose new facilities in
this area that will leverage the use of the
existing facilities and infrastructure (parking,
restrooms, utilities, etc.) as part of the
master plan. The former golf clubhouse
and parking area is also an opportunity
for improvements and community facilities.
While the buildings are in a state of decline,
the opportunity to renovate or replace the
structures and utilize the existing parking
and utilities (water, sewer, electrical) will
reduce the initial investment for improving
this area.
In addition to the existing facilities, the
existing jurisdictional wetlands on site can
be restored to provide important habitat for
local wildlife and the French Camp Slough
can provide river access and wildlife viewing
areas. While there are existing trees, many
are non-native and declining, this provides
the opportunity to reforest the area with
native trees to reinforce the natural quality
of the area and provide additional wildlife
habitat.
CONSTRAINTS
The development of the park has challenges
as well, the property is 192 acres and will
be a massive undertaking to program a
site of this scale. Realistically it would not be
feasible for the City to develop the entire site
and to maintain a park of that size. Since the
closure of the golf course there have been
issues with the unhoused population using
the site, being able keep the site safe and
secure will need to be an important part of
the design.
Source: American Community Survey 2021
| 3
E CHARTER WAY
W CHARTER WAY
VAN BUSKIRK PARK
DOWNTOWN
STOCKTON
COUNTRY
CLUB
Project Site
Schools
Parks
Waterways
Major Roads
Legend
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
AUGUST
TAFT
MOSSWOOD WEST SIDE FWY I-5
PARK
KENNEDY
CONWAY
WILLOW
SEAPORT
GARDEN
ACRES
WESTON RANCH
HY-99 GOLDEN STATE HWY
SR-4 CROSSTOWN FWY
SR-4
SR-26
ATTACHMENT A 1933
2 ATTACHMENT A 1934
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
| 5
ATTACHMENT A 1935
ENGAGEMENT AT A GLANCE
In person meeting 4 with the community
Online
surveys 2
Staff
meetings 9
Stakeholder 6 meetings
Survey 110 responses
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
SUMMARY
Over the course of two years five public
meetings were held, two online surveys were
conducted, and meetings with stakeholders
and interested public agencies took place to
understand the community’s concerns and
to determine what programming was most
desired by the community and City staff.
PROCESS
A variety of outreach methods were utilized
to gather feedback including: stakeholder
meetings, public meetings, and online surveys.
Working with City staff, the design team was
able to provide engagement opportunities
in various venues to solicit community board
community input and participation.
ENGAGEMENT METHODS
STAKEHOLDERS
During the research and design process,
meetings with fourteen stakeholder groups
that represented diverse interests provided the
design team with specific needs and uses to
consider in the programming and site design
for the park. These included the following:
• Conway Home Resident Council
• Visionary Home Builders
• San Joaquin County Public
Health Services
• Jobs Plus Employment Center
• San Joaquin County Housing Authority
• Kipp Charter School
• REACH of Stockton
• STAND Affordable Housing
• Reinvent South Stockton Coalition
• Edison High School Cross
Country Coach
• Stockton High School Golf Coaches
PUBLIC MEETINGS
One virtual public meeting and four in-person
public meetings were held with 126 attendees.
The public was engaged at various stages of
the project from initial programming to park
design discussions.
In-person surveys were conducted at the
meetings as well as open format discussions
to allow those attending the opportunity to
learn about the project, ask questions of the
design team and City staff and provide input
on the types of uses and programs being
proposed.
The public meetings in September 2022
were joint meetings with the US Army Corp
of Engineers (USACE) for the community to
learn about the potential use of much of the
western portion of the property for future
flood control, wetland and habitat mitigation.
Those attending had the opportunity to
provide input on the portion of the park that
may be utilized for future flood mitigation.
SURVEYS
Two online surveys were conducted by
the design team and the City. The surveys
provided the opportunity for participants to
provide input on the type of programming
and desired uses for the park. Three site
plan alternatives were provided along with
representative images to help communicate
how uses could be arranged on the site
as well as the programs. The survey also
included several open-ended questions
giving participants the opportunity to provide
comments on what they preferred
CITY & PUBLIC AGENCY MEETINGS
The design team met regularly with City
staff throughout the project to ensure the
design would meet the community’s needs
and would be a feasible and implementable
project in the future.
Once the team had developed a preferred
alternative the design team presented to
a larger group of community agencies
including:
• City Manager’s Office
• City of Stockton Community
Development
• City of Stockton Public Works
• City of Stockton Police Chief
• City of Stockton Fire Chief
Throughout the project process the design
team and City staff worked with the USACE
and San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency
(SJAFCA) to establish a partnership and agree
upon the potential uses for Van Buskirk Park.
Currently City staff is working with SJAFCA
and USACE to determine what future
environmental mitigation measures and
restoration could be implemented at
Van Buskirk and the final design of these
measures.
ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
“We want a park where
residents feel space that
provides opportunities
for youth activities. I was
very interested in the
walking trails and outdoor
fitness course”
Comment from public meeting
participant
6 |
ATTACHMENT A 1936
JULY 2021
• Public meeting #1 held at Van
Buskirk Community Center
AUGUST 2021
• Stakeholder meeting with Stockton
High School golf coaches. The
design team met with several of
the high school golf coaches to
discuss the idea of establishing a
golf training academy at Van Buskirk,
since the teams were impacted by
the closure of the golf course.
FALL/ WINTER 2021-2022
• Design team used results from the first
round of engagement to develop site
plan alternatives for Van Buskirk Park.
APRIL 2022
• City staff and design team had
a work session with USACE
about the opportunities for flood
mitigation at Van Buskirk.
• Design team presented a the preferred
site plan to a larger group of City staff,
police and fire chiefs. The design team
received valuable feedback on how to
design the site to deter negative uses.
MAY 2022
• Design team presented site
plan alternatives and project
update to City Council.
SEPTEMBER 2022
• Online survey #2 goes live for eight
weeks. This survey was intended to
be focused on youth participation
as directed by City Council.
ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
Public meetings at Weston Ranch Library.
TIMELINE
FEBRUARY 2021
• Project kick off with City staff
MARCH 2021
• Stakeholder meeting #1
• Design team introduction with
SJAFCA to understand how
improvements to the site relate
to the levee and flood control
• Stakeholder meeting #2
APRIL 2021
• Design team met on site with the Edison
High School cross country coach to
walk a potential course for the team to
use in the future. Currently the students
at Edison are limited to using the high
school property for events and a
course at Van Buskirk would provide the
students with a better course for races
and other potential running events.
MAY 2021
• Virtual public meeting
• Public meeting #1 held at
Weston Ranch Library
JUNE 2021
• Online survey #1 goes
live for eight weeks
• Public meeting #2 held at Van
Buskirk Community Center
• Public meeting #2 held at
Weston Ranch Library
ENGAGEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
KEY TAKEAWAYS & CONCERNS
The community continually expressed Van
Buskirk Park to be safe, easily accessed by
emergency services to keep the site secure
and free of negative uses.
Many comments were provided to ensure
that the park has uses that will engage
younger kids as well as middle school and
high school age kids. There was also a desire
for opportunities that will create stronger
community connections through a variety of
events.
Through the public meetings the design
team was able to have many one on one
conversations with community members
about their concerns about the park as well
some deeper insight into the history of this
community. Many residents described how
the closure of the golf course has led to the
deterioration of the property and how they
are very excited to see the site become
activated in the future.
| 7
ATTACHMENT A 1937
SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Daily
A few times a week
Once a week
A few times a month
Once a month
Never
How often do you visit the existing Van Buskirk Community Center? 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Less than 1 year
1-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21+ years
I don't live in Stockton
How long have you lived in Stockton?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Daily
A few times a week
Once a week
A few times a month
Once a month
Never
How often do you visit the existing Van Buskirk Park?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Under 18
18 - 29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70+
Which of the following best describes your age?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Sports Fields
Sports Courts
Playground
Youth Sports
Indoor Gym
Summer Camps
After School Programs
Brown Bag Program
None
Arts & Crafts Classes
What are your primary activities or purpose when you visit Van Buskirk Community Center & Park?
COMPLIED ENGAGEMENT DATA
Throughout the project the design team
used a variety of questions to see what
demographic groups were participating in
the public engagement. We were able gather
feedback from a wide range of age groups
which provided reliable data on current
users of the park and community center and
what programming the residents are most
interested in for future improvements.
The following graphs represent the
complied responses from the two surveys
and four public meetings. Complete public
engagement information can be found in the
appendix on page 34.
8 |
ATTACHMENT A 1938
Other Responses: golf/golf training (8 responses), cross country course (5 responses), cricket field, special needs tee ball, running track, disc golf Other Responses: golf/golf training (5 responses), running course (5 responses), skateboarding,movies in the park, music at the park, skating rink, mini golf, study spaces, disc golf (6 responses), walking paths (2 responses)
Other Responses: cross country course (11 responses), running track (3 responses), amusement park, theater/drama, skate park concerts, walking paths, giant chess set Other Responses: golf/golf training (6 responses), cross country course (3 responses), swimming pool, ice rink, high school sports, nature walk, disc golf (7 responses), hiking trail Other Responses: golf/golf training (9 responses), cross country course (3 responses), badminton, skating
| 9
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Basketball
Tennis
Volleyball
Pickleball
Four Square
Other
None
What types of sports courts would you most use?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Soccer
Football
Baseball
Softball
Other
None
Lacrosse
What types of sports fields would you most use?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Outdoor fitness course
Water play/splash pad
Playground
Fishing pond
Skate park
Mountain bike pump track
Other
BMX Track
None
What organized facilities would you most use?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Golf training
Outdoor exercise classes
Community garden
Dog park
Native contemplative garden
Other
Disc golf
None
What organized activities would you most use?
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
Community & cultural events
Sporting events
Family picnics
small gathering space
Arts & entertainment
Food truck round ups
large grathering space
Wedding venue
Other
What kind of events and gathering spaces would you most use? ATTACHMENT A 1939
3 ATTACHMENT A 1940
ALTERNATIVES & COLLABORATION
| 11
ATTACHMENT A 1941
ALTERNATIVES
CONSISTENT ELEMENTS IN
ALL ALTERNATIVES
To develop a final master plan for Van
Buskirk Park, a number of alternatives were
prepared and presented to the community
and stakeholders for input. While each of
the alternatives have differences, there are
several key elements that are consistent
with all the alternatives and the overall park
experience:
• A landscaped linear park along the
portion of Houston Avenue that fronts
the park and provides an enjoyable
multi-use path with seating areas and
improves connectivity between the
park and the surrounding community.
• Each alternative suggests a lower
level of improvements and active
use for the area west of the previous
golf clubhouse. Improvements
focus on restoration, improving
wildlife habitat while including trails,
seating, and viewing areas that
allow users to explore and enjoy
the natural beauty of the park while
minimizing environmental impact.
• A small park and day use area is
strategically placed at the western
edge of the site providing a small
neighborhood park within short
walking distance to the residents
in the immediate area.
• Throughout the park each alternative
will include various proposed uses.
Trails provide a recreational benefit as
well as connecting to neighborhoods.
• Each alternative has two primary
gathering areas where utilities (water,
sewer, electricity) currently exist.
0 400 800 1600
1” = 800’ ALTERNATIVE ONE
Alternative one concept builds off a public
engagement process where several
community meetings were held to discuss
uses the residents would like to see adjacent
to the existing Van Buskirk Community Center.
This effort was conducted to develop a
plan that the City would use for applying
for funding under the Proposition 68 grant
administered by the Sacramento – San
Joaquin Delta Conservancy. While the
City was unsuccessful with the grant, this
alternative includes the types of uses that
were desired adjacent to the Community
Center. The existing golf clubhouse structures
are to be replaced and the parking area
improved as one of the main access points
for the park. In addition, three small parks
are located throughout the site: one on the
east connected to the existing community
center and park, one at the center around the
existing golf course parking and clubhouse,
and one on the west side at the corner of
Houston Avenue and 8th street accessed by
emergency services to keep the site secure
and discouraging negative uses.
12 |
EXISTING PARK
VAN BUSKIRK COMMUNITY
PARK EXPANSION, PROP 68
LOW IMPACT
ACTIVITIES
MULTIPURPOSE
BUILDING
PARKING
DOG PARK
PARKING
COMMUNITY CENTER
DAY USE &
PICNICKING
DAY USE &
PICNICKING
LOW
IMPACT
PROGRAMS
NEIGHBORHOOD
ENHANCEMENT BUFFER
NEIGHBORHOOD
ENHANCEMENT BUFFER
ACCESS POINTS
ATTACHMENT A 1942
ALTERNATIVES
ALTERNATIVE TWO
The second alternative focuses on expanded
programs concentrated between the
Community Center and the Golf Clubhouse
and parking area. Larger areas for group
gatherings and picnics, organized park
facilities, such as skate and bike parks, as well
as dog parks are included. A large portion
of the site between these two active areas
is proposed as low impact type of uses,
allowing flexibility in the development of
the park. This concept emphasizes activities
tailored for children, with kid-focused
amenities concentrated near the community
center, shown in the multi-generational and
organized park areas. The proximity to the
community center enhances convenience and
promotes a safe and engaging environment
for young park users.
0 400 800 1600
1” = 800’
| 13
ORGANIZED PARK
NEIGHBORHOOD
ENHANCEMENT BUFFER
EXISTING PARK DOG
PARK
COMMUNITY GARDEN
SERVICE FACILITY
DAY USE &
PICNICKING
LOW IMPACT
ACTIVITIES
LOW IMPACT
PROGRAMS
PARKING
COMMUNITY
CENTER
MULTI-GENERATIONAL
ACTIVITIES
PARKING
NEIGHBORHOOD
ENHANCEMENT BUFFER
MULTIPURPOSE
BUILDING
DOG PARK
PLAYGROUND
DAY USE &
PICNICKING
ACCESS POINTS
ATTACHMENT A 1943
ALTERNATIVES
ALTERNATIVE THREE
The third concept focuses on creating larger
gathering and event spaces at the center
of the park. These spaces are designed to
accommodate a variety of community and
cultural events. A new outdoor education
center is proposed near the low impact
activities and trails. Its proximity to the low
impact areas and trails allows for seamless
integration of educational activities with the
natural surroundings. To cater to the diverse
needs of the community, multi-generational
recreation and outdoor exercise features
are purposefully placed near the community
center and the community garden is
expanded to allow for more production space
and associated maintenance areas.
0 400 800 1600
1” = 800’
14 |
PARKING
NEIGHBORHOOD
ENHANCEMENT BUFFER
EXISTING PARK
PARKING
COMMUNITY CENTER
MULTI-GENERATIONAL
ACTIVITIES
ORGANIZED
PARK
EVENT
SPACE
EDUCATION
NEIGHBORHOOD
ENHANCEMENT BUFFER
LOW IMPACT
ACTIVITIES
LOW IMPACT
PROGRAMS
DAY USE &
PICNICKING
PARKING
MULTIPURPOSE
BUILDING
DOG PARK
DAY USE &
PICNICKING
COMMUNITY GARDEN
SERVICE FACILITY
ACCESS POINTS
ATTACHMENT A 1944
ALTERNATIVES
PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
The three alternatives were presented
to the community and stakeholders to
gain feedback, and to share ideas and
concerns. The community feedback led to
the development of a preferred alternative
that reflects the best components of all
the alternatives. The preferred alternative
incorporates several key additions and
enhancements to create a vibrant and
inclusive community space. Adjacent to the
existing community center, additional outdoor
basketball courts, a new bike and skate park
with associated amenities are included,
providing easily supervised and accessible
areas for after-school programs and summer
camps. To establish a connection with
nutrition programs offered at the community
center, a community garden is proposed
near the center. Space for additional
parking is provided in the event the existing
Community Center parking is inadequate to
accommodate the proposed uses.
Based on community desires, a multipurpose
lawn area is the focus of a new park entrance
proposed at the intersection of Houston
Avenue and Georgia Avenue. The lawn
area is large enough to support limited
organized sports but still provides practice
areas for sports teams and informal play.
The multipurpose lawn also has ample area
for large family and community gatherings.
A splash pad/water play area is proposed
and an 18-hole disc golf course is positioned
along the southern edge of the park, running
parallel to the levee. This location ensures
that it remains separate from the main
walking paths, reducing potential conflicts
between pedestrians and disc golf players. A
convenient parking area provides access to
new day-use areas and play fields.
Throughout the process there was interest
in including new golf features at the park.
While a full golf course would not be feasible
a golf academy with a modest golf training
facility has been included. These facilities
have been successfully constructed and
operated throughout the country allowing
the opportunity to practice key aspects of the
0 400 800 1600
game, would provide a practice facility for the 1” = 800’ local schools and introduces new players to
the game in a much smaller footprint.
To accommodate desired community events,
the replacement of the existing golf clubhouse
structures will provide indoor facilities to host
community meetings and social gatherings,
space for food and beverage operations,
educational areas, and staging for events
such as running races or outdoor music
events. To the east of the new buildings,
an event lawn with outdoor pavilion will
provide a venue for hosting concerts and
performances. Adjacent to the event lawn
there are opportunities for adventure play, a
children’s playground, pickleball courts, and
picnic areas. To the west there is an area
devoted for environmental education with
a large outdoor deck area for events and
river access for non-motorized watercraft.
Near the existing parking along Houston
Avenue a large enclosed dog park area
accommodating dogs of various sizes is
proposed. The parking area has been
enlarged to accommodate the expanded use
in this area.
The area that was previously identified as
low impact development and restoration has
been highlighted as potential environmental
mitigation to improve the safety of the
neighborhoods in the event of flooding. The
USACE is in the process of repairing and
replacing several miles of the levee in the
San Joaquin River Delta and this area of
Van Buskirk Park is ideal to the USACE for
flood control, wetland mitigation and habitat
enhancement. While this will require on going
collaboration and coordination with the City,
public access will be included that is consistent
with the low impact uses intended for this
area.
| 15
PICNIC & DAY USE
PICNIC & DAY USE
PICNIC & DAY USE
TRAILS
NEW
LEVEE
EVENT AREA
LAWN & PLAY FIELDS
COMMUNITY GARDEN
DOG PARK
RIVER ACCESS
GOLF ACADEMY
POTENTIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
MITIGATION
IMPROVEMENTS
DISC GOLF
EXISTING LEVEE
BASKETBALL
COURTS
SKATE PARK
EXISTING
COMMUNITY CENTER
BIKE PUMP TRACK
BIKE PARK
PLAYGROUND
PARKING
PARKING
EXISTING PARK
EXISTING &
EXPANDED
PARKING
MULTI-USE
BUILDINGS
Walker Slough
Marshall
Elementary
School
San Joaquin
Elementary &
Middle School
West 8th Street
Houston Ave
Houston Ave
Houston Ave
Taylor
Elementary
School
San Joaquin River
San Joaquin River
French Camp Slough
ATTACHMENT A 1945
AGENCY COLLABORATION
During the master planning process, the City
was approached by USACE in conjunction
with SJAFCA to inquire about possibly using
a portion of the Van Buskirk Park for flood
protection, riparian and wetland mitigation
and habitat remediation. Currently the USACE
is looking at approximately 2.3 miles of
levee repair, replacement, and relocation to
address current and long-term issues related
to flooding and climate change. Due to the
location of the park at the confluence of the
French Camp Slough and the Lower San
Joaquin River and the potential area available,
Van Buskirk Park has value for mitigation
opportunities for the San Joaquin River Basin
and Lower San Joaquin River projects.
The San Joaquin River Basin, Lower San
Joaquin River, California Final Integrated
Interim Feasibility Report/Environmental
Impact Statement / Environmental Impact
Report have identified Phase ‘E’ Duck Creek
and French Camp Slough levee reach that
are in need of flood improvements. Design
Workshop was then connected with SJAFCA
about how the master planning process
for the park would work in conjunction with
potential flood control measures. Since much
of the site west of the existing golf clubhouse
had been identified as low impact, passive
uses with an emphasis on restoration, the
opportunity to consider this area for use by
the USACE was consistent with what had been
discussed with the community during the early
stages of the master plan process.
As part of the planning process, the USACE
and SJAFCA attended and presented
information about the flood control project
and how the Van Buskirk site would assist
with some of their needs for environmental
mitigation sites. This included two alternatives,
a setback levee that is 75 feet off of Houston
Avenue providing mitigation opportunities
USACE Alternative 1 USACE Alternative 2
versus a fix-in-place levee. The community
was generally in favor of this and had
expressed concern for improving flood
protection early in the community outreach
process. All of the proposed levee alternatives
will provide public access in the way of trails
and passive uses such as wildlife viewing.
At the completion of this master plan, the
USACE and SJAFCA are diligently assessing
the Van Buskirk site and have elevated
the importance of this stretch of the levee
improvement project from the initial priority
six to priority three. Early design efforts are in
progress and it is anticipated that design will
begin in 2025.
Source: USACE
Source: USACE Source: USACE
16 |
ATTACHMENT A 1946
AGENCY COLLABORATION
Source: USACE
Source: USACE
| 17
ATTACHMENT A 1947
4 ATTACHMENT A 1948
MASTER PLAN
| 19
ATTACHMENT A 1949
MASTER PLAN
20 |
0 300 600 1200
1” = 600’
Houston Ave
Colorado Ave
Fresno Ave
Diamond Oaks St
Tilden Park St
Dry Creek Way
Verstl Way
Potential flood control and
wetland mitigation area
Lever Blvd
Weston Ranch
San Joaquin River San Joaquin River
French Camp Slough
Walker Slough
Manthey Rd
Georgia Ave
2 1
3 4
5 5
5 5
6 7
8 9
20 21
19 10
11 12 13
14 15
16 16
16 17
19 LEGEND
Basketball Courts
Splash Pad/Water Play
Multipurpose Lawn/Fields
Disc Golf
Golf Academy
Event Lawn/Group Gathering
Existing Community Park
Existing Community Center
Adventure Playground/Playground
Pickleball Courts
Dog Park
Community Building/Restrooms
River Access
Linear Park
Trails/Exercise Course
Neighborhood Park
Existing Levee
Houston Ave
.
W 8th Street
San Joaquin
Elementary
School
Marshall
Elementary
School
Skate Park
Bike Trails and BMX Track
Community Garden
Parking
123456
5 789
10 20
21 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
18 ATTACHMENT A 1950
MASTER PLAN
The master plan incorporates several design
features to create a vibrant community
space. It includes an enhanced neighborhood
connector along Houston Avenue, providing
improved accessibility and connectivity to
the park. Internal walking loops also span
the entire length of the park, promoting
physical activity and offering diverse routes for
exploration.
The park design prioritizes safety and visibility
by creating a usable edge and incorporating
features that increase visibility from the
community. More frequent use will make
the park feel safer and more welcoming.
Additionally, the internal pedestrian paths
are large enough to accommodate security
vehicles and emergency access when
necessary, ensuring the well-being of park
visitors.
The park is designed to be diverse and
inclusive, with a wide range of amenities that
will attract a variety of users, catering to their
different preferences and interests. Van Buskirk
will become an activated community hub for
the residents of south Stockton, providing new
recreation opportunities and serving as a
central gathering place.
Community Garden
Water Play
Golf Academy Skate Park Community Events
Walking Paths and Trails
| 21
ATTACHMENT A 1951
MASTER PLAN EAST ENLARGEMENT
22 |
LEGEND
Basketball Courts
Parking
Splash Pad/Water Play
Disc Golf
Multipurpose Lawn/Fields
Golf Academy
Existing Levee
Existing Community Park
Existing Community Center
Linear Park
Houston Ave
Colorado Ave
Walker Slough
Georgia Ave
Skate Park
Bike Trails
BMX Track
Community Garden
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
6 7
7 8
8 9
9 10
10 12
12 12
13 13
14 14
11 11
11 0 100 200 400
1” = 200’
ATTACHMENT A 1952
| 23
Outdoor Education Walking Trails
Disc Golf
Sporting Events Basketball Adventure Play Outdoor Exercise Course Habitat Restoration
ATTACHMENT A 1953
MASTER PLAN CENTRAL ENLARGEMENT
24 |
0 100 200 400
1” = 200’
LEGEND
Parking
Golf Academy
Existing Levee
Golf Training Center
Event Lawn/Group Gathering
Pickleball Courts
Dog Park
Adventure Playground/Playground
Outdoor Education Center
Community Building/Restrooms
Multipurpose Lawn/Fields
River Access
Event Staging Area
Linear Park
Trails/Exercise Course
1 1
2 2
15 15
15 3
3 4
4 5
5 6
6 7
7 8
8 9
9 10
10 11
11 12
12 13
13 13
14 14
French Camp Slough
Houston Ave
Fresno Ave
Dry Creek Way
Verstl Way
Potential flood control and
wetland mitigation area
ATTACHMENT A 1954
MASTER PLAN WEST ENLARGEMENT
| 25
0 100 200 400
1” = 200’
LEGEND
Parking
Neighborhood Park
Walking Trails
Future Flood Mitigation
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
Houston Ave
W 8th Street
Van Buskirk St
Tilden Park St
San Joaquin River
Potential flood control and
wetland mitigation area
• Playground
• Group Gathering
• Lawn Area
ATTACHMENT A 1955
5 ATTACHMENT A 1956
IMPLEMENTATION
| 27
ATTACHMENT A 1957
PHASING
28 |
LEGEND
Basketball Courts
Disc Golf
Golf Academy
Pickleball Courts
Event Area
Playground and Adventure Play
Community Facilities/Event Staging
Dog Park
Trails and Fitness Loop
Neighborhood Park (West End)
Linear Park
Lot 1 - Near Community Center
Lot 2 - Near Multipurpose Lawn
Lot 3 - Near Event Area
Lot 4 - Renovation of Existing Lot
Houston Ave
Houston Ave
Colorado Ave
Fresno Ave
Diamond Oaks St
Tilden Park St
Van Buskirk St
Dry Creek Way
Verstl Way
Potential flood control and
wetland mitigation area
Lever Blvd
W 8th Street
San Joaquin
Elementary
School
Marshall
Elementary
School
Weston Ranch
San Joaquin River San Joaquin River
French Camp Slough
Walker Slough
Manthey Rd
Georgia Ave
Skate Park
Bike Trails and BMX Track
Community Garden
Multipurpose Lawn and Water Play
A
A
B
B
C
C
DE
D
F
P
S
R
Q
GH
E
IFJ
G
K
I
L
J
M
H
N
L
O
K
PQ
O
O
O
M
RS
0 300 600 1200
1” = 600’
N
ATTACHMENT A 1958
PHASING
PHASING
A park of this size typically takes years to
implement. Given current funding and
operational challenges, there are more
projects on this list than can feasibly be
accomplished in the next several years.
Developing a phasing plan helps with
identifying funding to pursue and a logical
approach for park improvements yet can
be less flexible to take advantage of funding
sources that may arise. However, there are a
few things to consider assisting with phasing in
the improvements. The availability of funding
will determine the schedule and scope of
projects to be implemented. Developing a list
of projects and where potential funding can
be obtained will:
• Provide General Fund dollars
to implement improvements
that are high priority for the
community and/ or for matching
funding when pursuing grants.
• Projects that have potential to be
funded through grants, donations,
or other funding sources should
be considered a high priority.
• Projects that generate revenue
and recover all direct costs to be
self-supporting, without relying on
General Fund dollars. This may
require constructing the facilities to
support the operations and may be
part of the city-wide concessionaire
programs such as concert venues,
sporting events, community space
for rent (weddings, reunions, etc.).
PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA
There are several criteria that can be used to
determine a “priority project”. The following
prioritization criteria were developed based
on community priorities and will assist the
City with evaluating their annual capital
improvement and investment plans. A project
is considered a priority if it:
• Ensures health and safety. Unsafe or
unhealthy conditions must be rectified
to reduce liability and ensure the
well-being of park and facility users.
• Utilizes available funding. Projects
that have potential to be funded
through grants, donations, or
other funding sources should be
considered a high priority.
• Generates revenue/is self-supporting.
Priority is given to projects that can
generate revenue and recover all direct
costs to be self-supporting, without
relying on General Fund dollars.
• Leverages partner resources. Projects
that take advantage of resources or
funding provided by other entities
should have a high priority, especially
if the project also meets other criteria.
• Addresses gaps in service. Projects that
will serve targeted population groups
or provide opportunities in underserved
areas should be prioritized.
Additional criteria that will need to be
considered when selecting a project for
implementation include the following.
FINAL DESIGN
The master plan developed for Van Buskirk
provides the framework and vision for the
future of the park. For improvements to
occur, a final design will need to be prepared
that clearly documents the proposed
improvements and provides the information to
successfully construct the project. Typically, the
City solicits services from design professionals
to prepare final design documents and
contractors for installation.
PERMITTING
Depending on the extent of the improvements,
environmental permitting will be required.
Some improvements may be exempt, yet
others will require some level of California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to be
completed. Prior to selecting a project to
move forward with, the City should identify the
type of environmental permitting required.
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS
With existing infrastructure (water, sewer,
electricity) currently available at the
Community Center and the existing golf
clubhouse area, expansion from these two
areas makes logical sense. The existing
conditions and capacity of the existing utilities
will need to be assessed to include the full
build out of the park.
OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS
In some cases, there may be offsite
improvements required as part of a project.
Typically, these would include street frontage
improvements and traffic calming measures
that are not part of the park property.
A project’s rating as a “priority project” is
dependent on factors that change over
time, such as the availability of funding and
interest of potential partners. For this reason, a
project’s priority status may change, and the
project may be implemented on a different
timeline than anticipated. The City should
review and re-evaluate all capital projects
annually in preparation of their Capital
Investment Plan or Capital Facilities Plan to
determine which projects to advance when
funding is available.
PAY ITEM Description Unit Price Extended
Total Amount
A Basketball Courts
TOTAL $884,375
B Skate Park
TOTAL $3,967,500
C BMX Track and Bike Trails
TOTAL $3,989,375
D Community Garden
TOTAL $3,418,750
E Multipurpose Lawn and Water Play
TOTAL $5,503,125
F Disc Golf
TOTAL $2,425,000
G Golf Academy
TOTAL $8,156,250
H Pickleball Courts
TOTAL $1,181,000
I Event Area
TOTAL $1,825,000
J Playground and Adventure Playground (Near Clubhouse)
TOTAL $1,790,625
K Community Facilities/ Events Staging
TOTAL $12,325,125
L Dog Park
TOTAL $2,400,625
M Trails and Fitness Loop
TOTAL $9,103,770
N Neighborhood Park - West End
TOTAL $1,066,875
O Linear Park
TOTAL $6,967,500
P Parking Area 1 - Near Community Center
TOTAL $1,422,500
Q Parking Area 2- Near Multi Purpose Lawn and Playground TOTAL $2,053,750
R Parking Area 3 - Near Event Area
TOTAL $1,070,000
S Parking Area 4 - Renovation of Existing Parking
TOTAL $1,527,500
The detailed cost opinion can be found in the appendix on page 48. | 29
ATTACHMENT A 1959
IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION
With limited general funds available to
implement the Van Buskirk Master Plan,
finding alternative methods for financing
improvements requires the commitment by
the City to identify and pursue additional
funding sources. While many of these seem
straight forward, ensuring there is staff
focused on this will provide a foundation for
short- and long-term funding.
GRANT FUNDING
Over the years the City has been successful
receiving grant funding for various projects
in the City such as the $5.4 million for the
McKinley Park and Victory Park pools
provided through the California Department
of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants
and Local Services and Proposition 68.
Most recently the Proposition 68 application
for financial assistance for improvements
at Van Buskirk Park was unsuccessful yet
with this master plan for the full park and a
documented public engagement process,
applying for this funding again may yield a
different result.
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPP)
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are a
mechanism for government to procure and
implement public infrastructure and/or
services using the resources and expertise of
the private sector. PPP is based on two main
principles: Both parties invest in the project.
In a financial sense (manpower, materials
budget) and in an expertise-related sense
(knowledge, networks). The parties contribute
to a societal and often a commercial purpose.
While each PPP agreement is unique, many
concession models involve an upfront capital
infusion to the municipality. An example of this
may be the proposed golf academy identified
in the master plan.
USACE & SJAFCA
As described previously, the USACE and
SJAFCA expressed their interest in using most
of the western portion of the park for flood
control, wetland mitigation and habitat
development to offset impacts associated
with the 2.3 mile of levee improvements/
replacements underway. This can provide the
City with an opportunity to obtain funding to
improve and maintain the western portion
of the site as well as other areas in the park.
USACE is currently doing the geotechnical
exploration and utility potholing surveys at
Van Buskirk Park at various locations and if
favorable, design is anticipated to begin in the
year 2025.
STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
While the schools within the area of this park
have areas on site for recreation and outdoor
activities, during the master plan process a
few uses were discussed that would benefit
the Stockton Unified School District (SUSD)
curriculum. The opportunity for the park
to develop a cross country trail that meets
the requirements for hosting cross country
track events would be of value to the high
school and middle school. Creating a golf
academy for use by the schools for teaching
and improving the sport of golf was of
great interest. Providing areas for outdoor
and indoor environmental and educational
facilities during and for after school activities
was also discussed during public meetings.
With this in mind, the City and the SUSD
should discuss opportunities for providing
funding to build and/ or maintain park
improvements which support student and
instructor activities.
GOLF ORGANIZATIONS
During the master plan process, the desire
to have some type of golf facility was highly
desired by several people attending the
meetings. The master plan has identified a
general location and size for a golf academy
which provides a venue to teach and
improve golfing skills. There are several golf
organizations focused on this and may be a
partner for the City to consider. The following
are just a couple:
THE AMERICAN GOLF FOUNDATION (AGF)
This is a nonprofit organization dedicated to
promoting the game of golf and its ideals
through charity, education, and community
service. The cornerstone supporting AGF’s
mission is the dedicated, caring team of
volunteer AGF Ambassadors who are
mobilized at host golf courses. Ambassadors
contribute their time, passion, and energy
to helping educate golfers about the
game; raising funds for worthy local and
national charitable causes; and supporting
programs that provide people of all ages and
backgrounds with the opportunity to learn,
play and enjoy the game of golf.
FIRST TEE
First Tee San Joaquin currently runs all their
programs out of the Swenson golf course.
The new golf academy at Van Buskirk would
provide a new program location that would
be easier for residents of south Stockton to
access. The program provides youth with
free golf lessons to use golf as way to help
kids develop their character, resilience, selfconfidence through immersive golf lessons and activities.
EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD
The City of Stockton has worked with Edible
Schoolyard Project to develop the successful
Boggs Tract Community Farm that offers
outdoor education, K-12 garden and cooking
classes, teen volunteer programs, and
Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) box
giveaways. Edible Schoolyard works with
communities to provide hands-on experiences
for children understand the value of food,
nature, and stewardship. During the master
planning process, the City presented the Van
Buskirk site to the Edible Schoolyard Project
with the intent of creating a partnership to
manage and operate a new community
garden at Van Buskirk.
AMERICAN RIVERS
American Rivers is a national nonprofit
organization that works to protect and
restore all rivers, from remote mountain
streams to urban waterways, for people and
nature. They were successful with a grant
awarded to assist with providing guidance
and collaboration to integrate the Van Buskirk
Park and the USACE levee improvement,
including helping to provide access to the
river. They support relocation of a portion of
the levee to establish public access to the river
for recreation and reduce the risk of flooding
in Stockton. Maintaining a close working
relationship with American Rivers and other
organizations they are aligned with is critical
for the City to identify potential funding for
improvements and maintenance of portions
of the park.
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
This organization was founded in 1972 on
the conviction that all people need access to
nature and the outdoors, close to home, in the
cities and communities where they live. Over
the years they have worked with communities
to create parks and protect public land
where they are needed most and driven by
four commitments: equity, health, climate,
and community. With the types of park
improvements contained in the master plan,
the Trust for Public Land is a likely organization
to partner with the City.
30 |
ATTACHMENT A 1960
Park Concessionaire
River Habitat Restoration
First Tee Greater Sacramento Access To Public Lands River Recreation Edible Schoolyard Project
| 31
ATTACHMENT A 1961
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT A 1962
| 33
ATTACHMENT A 1963
APPENDIX 1
ONLINE SURVEY #1
RESULTS
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Less than 1 year
1-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21+ years
I don't live in Stockton
How long have you lived in Stockton?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Under 18
18 - 29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70+
Which of the following best describes your age?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Daily
A few times a week
Once a week
A few times a month
Once a month
Never
How often do you visit the existing Van Buskirk Community Center? 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Daily
A few times a week
Once a week
A few times a month
Once a month
Never
How often do you visit the existing Van Buskirk Park?
34 |
ATTACHMENT A 1964
APPENDIX 1
ONLINE SURVEY #1
RESULTS
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Sports Fields
Sports Courts
Playground
Youth Sports
Indoor Gym
Summer Camps
After School Programs
Brown Bag Program
Arts & Crafts Classes
What are your primary activities or purpose when you visit Van Buskirk Community Center & Park? 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Community & cultural events
Sporting events
Family picnics
small gathering space
Arts & entertainment
Food truck round ups
large grathering space
Wedding venue
Other
What kind of events and gathering spaces would you most use? 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Golf training
Outdoor exercise classes
Community garden
Dog park
Native contemplative garden
Other
Disc golf
None
What organized activities would you most use?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Outdoor fitness course
Water play/splash pad
Playground
Fishing pond
Skate park
Mountain bike pump track
Other
BMX Track
None
What organized facilities would you most use?
Other Responses: golf/golf training (5 responses), running course (5 responses), skateboarding,movies in the park, music at the park, skating space, mini golf course, study spaces Other Responses: cross country course (11 responses), running track (3 responses), amusement park, theater/ drama, skate park
Other Responses: golf/golf training (6 responses), cross country course (3 responses), swimming pool, ice rink, high school sports, nature walk
| 35
ATTACHMENT A 1965
APPENDIX 1
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Cafe/Coffee Shop
Large event space
Restrooms
Education & Nature Center
Small event space
Public Art
Other
None
What indoor facilities would you most use?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Basketball
Tennis
Volleyball
Pickleball
Four Square
Other
None
What types of sports courts would you most use?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Soccer
Football
Baseball
Softball
Other
None
Lacrosse
What types of sports fields would you most use?
ONLINE SURVEY #1
RESULTS
Other Responses: adult sports leagues, local art, music, films, theater, cultural places, classes, library Other Responses: golf/golf training (9 responses), cross country course (3 responses), badminton, skating Other Responses: golf/golf training (8 responses), cross country course (5 responses), cricket field, special needs tee ball, running track
36 |
ATTACHMENT A 1966
APPENDIX 1
ONLINE SURVEY #1
RESULTS
WHAT MOST EXCITES YOU ABOUT THE
THREE ALTERNATIVES?
• Skate park
• I never cared for the golf course
• Dog park, organized parks
• Having more activities for people of
all ages and as well as a dog park
• Skate park excites me the most, since
we only have one here in Stockton.
• Dog park, picnic
• An area for our youth to play at
• Extending the active park west
• Dog Park and playground
• Varieties of activities and
usage of the land.
• Nothing pretty similar
• That something is finally getting
done for that community!!
• Finally, there is interest in supporting
Southwest Stockton and attention
given to Van Buskirk Park.
• 3 because it uses most the
land and more programs
• Multi-generation area
• Plenty of space
• I like that there are options and I like
where the dog park is located.
• The many options
• Variety
• All three alternatives have a
diversified number of elements
• The golf course, I used to visit it often
• I wish I could comment more on this,
but I just don’t really know enough
about park design to say anything
• Many options for our community
• it looks like the golf course
extends along the river
• Activity Space
• Golf training facility
• Great for the community
excited about the prospects
• Pavilions in the golf course
• Like the all alternatives, but as long
as they take into consideration
that the park needs to be focus on
young kids to high school as those
who will use the park the most.
• More opportunity for the community
and students in our area
• Need to define area/budget
for realistic planning
• Keep the green space, keep gate up
• Nothing, park near Fresno should
be same as park on Ryde
• Bike trail, soccer & skate park
• Golf training
• Family activities, family
theme park, water park
• Nothing,park should have a playground
on both sides, east and west
• Skate park
• Family friendly activities have
been incorporated
• Skate park
• Skate park
• Community gardens
WHAT IS MISSING FROM THE THREE
ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED?
• Skate park
• i would love to see a skate park
• Skate park, walking trails
• Golf facilities
• a plan to activate the west end
of the park; we don’t want bike
tracks and crap like that.
• Balance of activities Fresno
area should have playground
,basketball court, & picnic areas
• I chose Alt #1 but would like to see
a Golf Training Area in the area just
west of the Multi-Purpose Bldg. In the
area marked Low Impact Activities.
The Golf Training Area would take
up about 25% of the Low Impact
Activity Area as it is shown in Alt. #1
• Prop. 68 appears to be missing
from Alt. 2 and 3. It would be nice
to have some type of water feature
(ie pool). Stockton does not offer a
public access pool in south Stockton.
McKinnley had a pool. It is now closed.
• Get rid of the botanical and native
garden, pet yard, more for under 15
orientated, with very few for older,
we have plenty of parks that older
can go to, just a few coffee, yoga,
for parents/guardians can do while
children play, it must have a entrance
gates with purchased passes unless
with in the neighborhood, we did
this at the lake in Twain harte for
residents free for visitors with a small
cost, we have plenty of adult parks
• Running course
• Running courses/ golf training facility
• It would be nice to see a golf
range for our Edison High School
students who live in this area.
• I would like to see a running trail. It can
hopefully still be incorporated around
these ideas. This would be great for
exercise and a great help for nearby
runners. As an Edison alumni, we would
always have to run on the streets and
never had a true home meet spot.
Van Buskirk could be a great place
for Edison sports to host races and for
runners to train in a safe, outdoor space
• Golfing
• Lack of parking/ access from
the Houston / 8th st side
• A designated running path
• Golf training
• Not sure
• Some sort of long distance
running trail would be nice.
• Running course
• I would like to see a Golf Training
center with short course presented.
• Golf element training for city
schools and first tee program
• Golf training Center
• HS Cross Country Course
• A jogging path or track for exercise.
• Safety features, budget
• Please update gate with metal
iron gate and update parking,
no bridge to Weston ranch
• Entry, its not just Conway park
• Access & activities in the low impact
areas, please develop John Peri Park
• Establish a foundation to
oversee the park
• Outdoor swimming pool,
walk trail, sports trail
• Include the youth in the process
• Parking
• Pool
• Water slides and amusement park
• Renewable energy
• Where would the golf training
be? Keep the fist half of the
golf course, stem center
• Miniature golf, fishing ponds,
bike trails, library hall
• Bike parking, pool- maybe
a small one to learn
| 37
ATTACHMENT A 1967
APPENDIX 2
ONLINE SURVEY #2
RESULTS
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 93204
95201
95203
95204
95205
95206
95207
95209
95215
95236
95242
95377
95693
95825
Please tell us what zip code you live in.
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%
Less than 1/2 mile
1/2 to 1 mile
1 to 2 miles
2 to 5 miles
More than 5 miles
Approximately how many miles do you live from Van Buskirk Park & Community Center?
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% Walk
Bike
Drive
Public Transportation
What mode of transportation would you likely use to get to Van Buskirk Park or Community Center? (Mark all that apply.)
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%
8 and under
9-18
19-30
31-50
51-60
60+
What age group(s) reside(s) in or visits your household? (Mark all that apply.) 38 |
ATTACHMENT A 1968
APPENDIX 2
ONLINE SURVEY #2
RESULTS
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Never
How often does your household currently use Van Buskirk Park?
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%
None of the above
Playground
Sports Courts
Sports Fields
Indoor Gym
Brown Bag Program
Supper Meal Program
Arts & Crafts Classes
Summer Camps
Youth Sports
After School Programs
What are your primary activities when you visit Van Buskirk Park or Community Center? (Select all that apply.)
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%
Community & cultural events
Wedding venue, large gathering space
Food truck round ups
Family picnics, small gathering space
Sporting events
Arts & entertainment
No additional gathering spaces are needed
Other (please specify)
What kind of events and gathering spaces would you most use? (Choose three)
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%
Golf training
Dog park
Disc golf
Native contemplative garden
Outdoor exercise classes
Community garden
None
Other (please specify)
What organized activities would you most use? (Choose two) Other Responses: Disc golf (6 responses), walking paths (2 responses) Other Responses: Concerts (1 response), walking paths (1 responses), giant chess set (1 response) | 39
ATTACHMENT A 1969
APPENDIX 2
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% Skate park
Outdoor fitness course
Mountain bike pump track
BMX track
Water play/Splash pad
Playground
Fishing pond
None
Other (please specify)
What organized facilities would you most use? (Choose two)
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%
Education & nature center
Café/Coffee shop
Large event space - community events, large family parties Small event space - classroom/meeting rooms
Public Art
Restrooms
None
Other (please specify)
What indoor facilities would you most use? (Choose two)
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% None of the above
Basketball
Pickleball
Four Square
Tennis
Volleyball
What type of sports courts would you most use? (Choose two)
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% None of the above
Baseball
Softball
Football
Soccer
Lacrosse
What type of sports fields would you most use? (Choose two) ONLINE SURVEY #2
RESULTS
Other Responses: Disc golf (7 responses), hiking trail (1 responses) 40 |
ATTACHMENT A 1970
APPENDIX 2
ONLINE SURVEY #2
RESULTS
WHAT OTHER HOBBIES,
RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES, OR AFTER
SCHOOL ACTIVITIES DO YOU ENJOY? • Walking, movies, relaxing, listening to music, concerts
• Enjoying the trees and levee • Enjoyable walking/biking paths. Dog Park
• Disc golf, Grappling • Disc golf • Disc golf • Disc golf • Disc golf, golfing • Disc golf • Throwing Frisbees • Disc golf • Disc golf • Disc golf • Disc golf • Disc golf • Van Buskirk is usually to busy for a family picnic like other parks.
Make it like Oak Grove Regional
Park mixed with Swenson.
• Disc Golf, bike trails • Golf, Waking • The community will benefit from any or all of the activities listed above.
• Arts • Giant chess, cook out, walk, run,
bicycling, picnic, fishing, and skating.
• Bike riding walking, basketball • Biking, boxing, swimming, running • Golf, disc golf, baseball, basketball • Gardening for wildlife, planting native plants/flowers for pollinators,
reading, biking, hiking, bird watching
• Golf • Coding
WHAT MOST EXCITES YOU ABOUT THE
THREE ALTERNATIVES? • I like the organized areas and
areas specific for use. The low
impact areas will be ruined by
the unsheltered and criminal.
• Disc golf • Disc golf course • Disc golf • I would really like to see a Disc golf at Van buskirk. It would bring an activity
that everyone could use in the area.
• Disc golfing • Disc golf • Disc golf • Disc Golf would bring many players from surrounding communities
• Disc golf!! • Disc golf • Bringing it back to nature. Disc golf doesn’t use the resources
that traditional golf does. Also the
potential for revenue for a disc golf
tournament. Check OTB Open at
Swenson Park. Swenson has had an
amazing revenue increase because
of the addition of disc golf.
• Taking the land back to a
more natural landscape.
• Input upon review • Skate park and bmx track • Baseball • Walking track • BMX/ Biking activities • Community garden • Garden, hiking trails, focus on nature conservation
WHAT IS MISSING FROM THE THREE
ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED? • Amphitheater • Residents have been asking and asking for sports fields, exercise equipment,
picnic shelters and general upgrades
to the area. Most of their ideas seem
missing. The ideas that continue seem
to be promoted by the consultant.
• Ice skating • More disc golf! • Disc golf • You’ve got most covered • Disc golf • Disc Golf and golf. • Permanent outdoor food vendor • Disc golf. Please check or ask about the revenue from the OTB Open
to Stockton. One of the biggest
draws of attendance in Stockton.
• Disc Golf would be a huge
addition to the property.
• Just a par 3 course and driving range!! • Input upon review of plan. • Walk trail • Swimming pool • Chess features. Built in tables, giant chess set...
• bike trail • Flood prevention • I think this plan totally misses on the community that it is in.
• Public restrooms • Miniature golf course surrounded
by native plant life.
| 41
ATTACHMENT A 1971
APPENDIX 3
PUBLIC MEETING #1 AT
WESTON RANCH LIBRARY
How long have you lived in
Stockton?
A. Less than 1 year
B. 1-5 years
C. 6-10 years
D. 11-20 years
E. 21+ years
F. I don’t live in Stockton
1. How old are you?
A. Under 18
B. 18-29
C. 30-39
D. 40-49
E. 50-59
F. 60-69
G. 70+
2. How often do you visit the existing
Van Buskirk Community Center?
A. Daily
B. A few times a week
C. Once a week
D. A few times a month
E. Once a month
F. Never
3. How often do you visit the
existing Van Buskirk Park?
A. Daily
B. A few times a week
C. Once a week
D. A few times a month
E. Once a month
F. Never
4. 42 |
ATTACHMENT A 1972
APPENDIX 3
PUBLIC MEETING #1 AT
WESTON RANCH LIBRARY
What are your primary activities or
purpose when you visit Van Buskirk
Community Center & Park?
A. Playground
B. Sports Courts
C. Sports Fields
D. Indoor Gym
E. Brown Bag Program
F. Supper Meal Program
G. Arts & Crafts Classes
H. Summer Camps
I. Youth Sports
J. After School Program
5. What organized activities would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Golf training
B. Dog park
C. Disc golf
D. Native contemplative garden
E. Outdoor exercise classes
F. Community garden
G. None
H. Other – fill out on Comment Card
7. What kind of events and gathering spaces
would you most use? (Choose three)
A. Community & cultural events
B. Wedding venue, large gathering space
C. Food truck round ups
D. Family picnics, small gathering space
E. Sporting events
F. Arts & entertainment
G. No additional gathering spaces are needs
H. Other – fill out on Comment Card
6. What organized facilities would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Skate park
B. Outdoor fitness course
C. Mountain bike pump track
D. BMX track
E. Water play/ splash pad
F. Playground
G. Fishing pond
H. None
I. Other – fill out on Comment Card
8. | 43
ATTACHMENT A 1973
APPENDIX 3
What kind of indoor facilities would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Education & Nature Center
B. Café/Coffee Shop
C. Large Event Space- community events, large family parties D. Small Event Space- classroom/meeting rooms
E. Public Art
F. Restrooms
G. None
H. Other – fill out on Comment Card
9. What type of sports courts would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Basketball
B. Pickleball
C. Four Square
D. Tennis
E. Volleyball
F. None
10. What type of sports fields would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Baseball
B. Softball
C. Football
D. Soccer
E. Lacrosse
F. None
11. PUBLIC MEETING #1 AT
WESTON RANCH LIBRARY
44 |
ATTACHMENT A 1974
APPENDIX 4
PUBLIC MEETING #1 AT
VAN BUSKIRK COMMUNITY
CENTER
How long have you lived in
Stockton?
A. Less than 1 year
B. 1-5 years
C. 6-10 years
D. 11-20 years
E. 21+ years
F. I don’t live in Stockton
1. How old are you?
A. Under 18
B. 18-29
C. 30-39
D. 40-49
E. 50-59
F. 60-69
G. 70+
2. How often do you visit the existing
Van Buskirk Community Center?
A. Daily
B. A few times a week
C. Once a week
D. A few times a month
E. Once a month
F. Never
3. How often do you visit the
existing Van Buskirk Park?
A. Daily
B. A few times a week
C. Once a week
D. A few times a month
E. Once a month
F. Never
4. | 45
ATTACHMENT A 1975
APPENDIX 4
PUBLIC MEETING #1 AT
VAN BUSKIRK COMMUNITY
CENTER
What are your primary activities or
purpose when you visit Van Buskirk
Community Center & Park?
A. Playground
B. Sports Courts
C. Sports Fields
D. Indoor Gym
E. Brown Bag Program
F. Supper Meal Program
G. Arts & Crafts Classes
H. Summer Camps
I. Youth Sports
J. After School Program
5. What kind of events and gathering spaces
would you most use? (Choose three)
A. Community & cultural events
B. Wedding venue, large gathering space
C. Food truck round ups
D. Family picnics, small gathering space
E. Sporting events
F. Arts & entertainment
G. No additional gathering spaces are needs
H. Other – fill out on Comment Card
6. What organized activities would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Golf training
B. Dog park
C. Disc golf
D. Native contemplative garden
E. Outdoor exercise classes
F. Community garden
G. None
H. Other – fill out on Comment Card
7. What organized facilities would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Skate park
B. Outdoor fitness course
C. Mountain bike pump track
D. BMX track
E. Water play/ splash pad
F. Playground
G. Fishing pond
H. None
I. Other – fill out on Comment Card
8. 46 |
ATTACHMENT A 1976
APPENDIX 4
What kind of indoor facilities would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Education & Nature Center
B. Café/Coffee Shop
C. Large Event Space- community events, large family parties D. Small Event Space- classroom/meeting rooms
E. Public Art
F. Restrooms
G. None
H. Other – fill out on Comment Card
9. What type of sports courts would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Basketball
B. Pickleball
C. Four Square
D. Tennis
E. Volleyball
F. None
10. What type of sports fields would
you most use? (Choose two)
A. Baseball
B. Softball
C. Football
D. Soccer
E. Lacrosse
F. None
11. PUBLIC MEETING #1 AT
VAN BUSKIRK COMMUNITY
CENTER
| 47
ATTACHMENT A 1977
MASTER PLAN COST OPINION
Project: Van Buskirk Park Master Plan Date 10-Mar-23
Location: Stokton, CA Project #:
Client: City of Stockton Generated by:
PAY ITEM Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Total Amount
A Basketball Courts
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 21,000 SF $2 $42,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 21,000 SF $3 $63,000
5 Paving - Court Surfacing 21,000 SF $20 $420,000
6 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Back Boards, etc.) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 1,500 SF $10 $15,000 8 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
9 Site Lighting 1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
11 Fencing 650 LF $50 $32,500
Subtotal $707,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $176,875 TOTAL $884,375
B Skate Park
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 3 Site Demolition 55,000 SF $3 $165,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 55,000 SF $5 $275,000
5 Skate Park Paving 50,000 SF $50 $2,500,000
6 Plaza Area (half of plaza) 3,000 SF $20 $60,000
7 Shade Structure Shelter 1 EA $20,000 $20,000
8 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 9 Utilities 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
10 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
11 Landscape and Irrigation 3,000 SF $8 $24,000
12 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
Subtotal $3,174,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $793,500 TOTAL $3,967,500
C BMX Track and Bike Trails
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 3 Site Demolition 265,000 SF $3 $795,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 265,000 SF $8 $2,120,000 5 Plaza Area (half of plaza) 3,000 SF $15 $45,000
6 Shade Structure Shelter 1 EA $20,000 $20,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, Storge Shed, etc) 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 8 Utilities 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
9 Site Lighting 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 3,000 SF $10 $30,000 11 Signage 1 LS $4,000 $4,000
12 Fencing 750 LF $50 $37,500
Subtotal $3,191,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $797,875 TOTAL $3,989,375
D Community Garden
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing (2%) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 225,000 SF $2 $450,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 225,000 SF $3 $675,000
5 Decomposed Granite Paving/ Pathways 112,500 SF $8 $900,000 6 Storgage Sheds ( Pre Fabricated) 2 EA $25,000 $50,000 7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation (Prep for Planting Only) 112,500 SF $4 $450,000 9 Raised Planters/ Boxes 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
Van Buskirk Park Master Plan
Design Workshop
8 Paving/ Walkways 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
9 Restroom 1 EA $500,000 $500,000
10 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $20,000 $40,000
11 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 12 Utilities 1 LS $70,000 $70,000
13 Site Lighting 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
14 Fencing 200 LF $50 $10,000
Subtotal $4,402,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,100,625 TOTAL $5,503,125
E Multi Purpose Lawn and Water Play
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $7,500 $7,500 3 Site Demolition 420,000 SF $2 $840,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 420,000 SF $3 $1,260,000 5 Splash Pad 1 LS $300,000 $300,000
6 Multi Purpose Lawn Area and Irrigation 380,000 SF $3 $1,140,000 7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 10,000 SF $5 $50,000 8 Paving/ Walkways 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
9 Restroom 1 EA $500,000 $500,000
10 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $20,000 $40,000
11 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 12 Utilities 1 LS $70,000 $70,000
13 Site Lighting 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
14 Fencing 200 LF $50 $10,000
Subtotal $4,402,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,100,625 TOTAL $5,503,125
F Disc Golf
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 550,000 SF $0.5 $275,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 550,000 LS $1 $275,000
5 Decomposed Granite Area 55,000 SF $5 $275,000
6 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $15,000 $30,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Baskets, etc.) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 8 Regevetation/ Temp Irrigation 495,000 SF $2 $990,000
9 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
Subtotal $1,940,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $485,000 TOTAL $2,425,000
G Golf Acadamy
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 3 Site Demolition 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000 5 Training Faclity (3000 sf) 3,000 SF $750 $2,250,000
6 Greens 30,000 SF $0
7 T Boxes 10,000 SF $0
8 Fariways 130,000 SF $0
8 Driving Range 35,000 SF $0
9 Sand Traps/ Hazards 13,000 SF $0
9 Cart Pats/Walkways 40,000 SF $0
10 Landscape Restoration and Irrigation 555,000 SF $3 $1,665,000 11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 224,000 SF $5 $1,120,000 12 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Safety Netting, etc.) 1 LS $150,000 $150,000 12 Fencing 3,400 LF $50 $170,000
9 Site Lighting 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 3,000 SF $10 $30,000 11 Signage 1 LS $4,000 $4,000
12 Fencing 750 LF $50 $37,500
Subtotal $3,191,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $797,875 TOTAL $3,989,375
D Community Garden
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing (2%) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 225,000 SF $2 $450,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 225,000 SF $3 $675,000
5 Decomposed Granite Paving/ Pathways 112,500 SF $8 $900,000 6 Storgage Sheds ( Pre Fabricated) 2 EA $25,000 $50,000 7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation (Prep for Planting Only) 112,500 SF $4 $450,000 9 Raised Planters/ Boxes 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
11 Site Lighting 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
12 Fencing 2,000 LF $40 $80,000
Subtotal $2,735,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $683,750 TOTAL $3,418,750
E Multi Purpose Lawn and Water Play
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $7,500 $7,500 3 Site Demolition 420,000 SF $2 $840,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 420,000 SF $3 $1,260,000 5 Splash Pad 1 LS $300,000 $300,000
6 Multi Purpose Lawn Area and Irrigation 380,000 SF $3 $1,140,000 7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 10,000 SF $5 $50,000 B Skate Park
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 3 Site Demolition 55,000 SF $3 $165,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 55,000 SF $5 $275,000
5 Skate Park Paving 50,000 SF $50 $2,500,000
6 Plaza Area (half of plaza) 3,000 SF $20 $60,000
7 Shade Structure Shelter 1 EA $20,000 $20,000
8 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 9 Utilities 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
10 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
11 Landscape and Irrigation 3,000 SF $8 $24,000
12 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
Subtotal $3,174,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $793,500 TOTAL $3,967,500
C BMX Track and Bike Trails
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 3 Site Demolition 265,000 SF $3 $795,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 265,000 SF $8 $2,120,000 5 Plaza Area (half of plaza) 3,000 SF $15 $45,000
6 Shade Structure Shelter 1 EA $20,000 $20,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, Storge Shed, etc) 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 8 Utilities 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
9 Site Lighting 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 3,000 SF $10 $30,000 11 Signage 1 LS $4,000 $4,000
12 Fencing 750 LF $50 $37,500
Subtotal $3,191,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $797,875 TOTAL $3,989,375
D Community Garden
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing (2%) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 225,000 SF $2 $450,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 225,000 SF $3 $675,000
5 Decomposed Granite Paving/ Pathways 112,500 SF $8 $900,000 6 Storgage Sheds ( Pre Fabricated) 2 EA $25,000 $50,000 7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation (Prep for Planting Only) 112,500 SF $4 $450,000 9 Raised Planters/ Boxes 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
11 Site Lighting 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
12 Fencing 2,000 LF $40 $80,000
Subtotal $2,735,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $683,750 TOTAL $3,418,750
E Multi Purpose Lawn and Water Play
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $7,500 $7,500 3 Site Demolition 420,000 SF $2 $840,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 420,000 SF $3 $1,260,000 5 Splash Pad 1 LS $300,000 $300,000
6 Multi Purpose Lawn Area and Irrigation 380,000 SF $3 $1,140,000 7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 10,000 SF $5 $50,000 8 Paving/ Walkways 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
9 Restroom 1 EA $500,000 $500,000
10 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $20,000 $40,000
11 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 12 Utilities 1 LS $70,000 $70,000
13 Site Lighting 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
14 Fencing 200 LF $50 $10,000
Subtotal $4,402,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,100,625 TOTAL $5,503,125
E Multi Purpose Lawn and Water Play
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $7,500 $7,500 3 Site Demolition 420,000 SF $2 $840,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 420,000 SF $3 $1,260,000 5 Splash Pad 1 LS $300,000 $300,000
6 Multi Purpose Lawn Area and Irrigation 380,000 SF $3 $1,140,000 7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 10,000 SF $5 $50,000 8 Paving/ Walkways 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
9 Restroom 1 EA $500,000 $500,000
10 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $20,000 $40,000
11 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 12 Utilities 1 LS $70,000 $70,000
13 Site Lighting 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
14 Fencing 200 LF $50 $10,000
Subtotal $4,402,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,100,625 TOTAL $5,503,125
F Disc Golf
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 550,000 SF $0.5 $275,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 550,000 LS $1 $275,000
5 Decomposed Granite Area 55,000 SF $5 $275,000
6 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $15,000 $30,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Baskets, etc.) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 8 Regevetation/ Temp Irrigation 495,000 SF $2 $990,000
9 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
Subtotal $1,940,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $485,000 TOTAL $2,425,000
G Golf Acadamy
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 3 Site Demolition 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000 5 Training Faclity (3000 sf) 3,000 SF $750 $2,250,000
6 Greens 30,000 SF $0
7 T Boxes 10,000 SF $0
8 Fariways 130,000 SF $0
8 Driving Range 35,000 SF $0
9 Sand Traps/ Hazards 13,000 SF $0
9 Cart Pats/Walkways 40,000 SF $0
10 Landscape Restoration and Irrigation 555,000 SF $3 $1,665,000 11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 224,000 SF $5 $1,120,000 12 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Safety Netting, etc.) 1 LS $150,000 $150,000 12 Fencing 3,400 LF $50 $170,000
The following pages show a range of probable construction costs, based on the master plan level design drawings in this document. This range is an opinion only and will need to be verified by a retained cost estimation specialist or by a contractor in the bidding and negotiation process after completion of construction documents. 48 |
ATTACHMENT A 1978
MASTER PLAN COST OPINION
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Baskets, etc.) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 8 Regevetation/ Temp Irrigation 495,000 SF $2 $990,000
9 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
Subtotal $1,940,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $485,000 TOTAL $2,425,000
G Golf Acadamy
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 3 Site Demolition 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000 5 Training Faclity (3000 sf) 3,000 SF $750 $2,250,000
6 Greens 30,000 SF $0
7 T Boxes 10,000 SF $0
8 Fariways 130,000 SF $0
8 Driving Range 35,000 SF $0
9 Sand Traps/ Hazards 13,000 SF $0
9 Cart Pats/Walkways 40,000 SF $0
10 Landscape Restoration and Irrigation 555,000 SF $3 $1,665,000 11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 224,000 SF $5 $1,120,000 12 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Safety Netting, etc.) 1 LS $150,000 $150,000 12 Fencing 3,400 LF $50 $170,000
13 Utilities 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
14 Signage 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
Subtotal $6,525,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,631,250 TOTAL $8,156,250
H Pickleball Courts
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 22,000 SF $3 $66,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 22,000 SF $4 $88,000
5 Court Paving 22,000 SF $30 $660,000
6 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $15,000 $30,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 8 Utilities 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
9 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
10 Fencing 520 LF $40 $20,800
Subtotal $944,800
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $236,200 TOTAL $1,181,000
I Event Area
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Baskets, etc.) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 8 Regevetation/ Temp Irrigation 495,000 SF $2 $990,000
9 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
10 Utilities 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
Subtotal $1,940,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $485,000 TOTAL $2,425,000
G Golf Acadamy
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 3 Site Demolition 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 1,040,000 SF $0.5 $520,000 5 Training Faclity (3000 sf) 3,000 SF $750 $2,250,000
6 Greens 30,000 SF $0
7 T Boxes 10,000 SF $0
8 Fariways 130,000 SF $0
8 Driving Range 35,000 SF $0
9 Sand Traps/ Hazards 13,000 SF $0
9 Cart Pats/Walkways 40,000 SF $0
10 Landscape Restoration and Irrigation 555,000 SF $3 $1,665,000 11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 224,000 SF $5 $1,120,000 12 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Safety Netting, etc.) 1 LS $150,000 $150,000 12 Fencing 3,400 LF $50 $170,000
13 Utilities 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
14 Signage 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
Subtotal $6,525,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,631,250 TOTAL $8,156,250
H Pickleball Courts
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 22,000 SF $3 $66,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 22,000 SF $4 $88,000
5 Court Paving 22,000 SF $30 $660,000
6 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $15,000 $30,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benched, etc) 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 8 Utilities 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
9 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
10 Fencing 520 LF $40 $20,800
Subtotal $944,800
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $236,200 TOTAL $1,181,000
I Event Area
9 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 10 Utilities 1 LS $125,000 $125,000
11 Signage 1 LS $2,500 $2,500
12 Fencing 500 LF $50 $25,000
Subtotal $1,460,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $365,000 TOTAL $1,825,000
J Playground and Adventure Playground (Near Clubhouse) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 44,000 SF $2 $88,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 44,000 SF $3 $132,000
5 Play Ground (Equipment and Surfacing) 1 LS $850,000 $850,000 6 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $40,000 $80,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 8 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 3,000 SF $20 $60,000
9 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2,500 SF $5 $12,500 10 Utilities 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
11 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
12 Fencing 1,200 LF $50 $60,000
Subtotal $1,432,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $358,125 TOTAL $1,790,625
K Community Faclities/ Events Staging
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 3 Site Demolition 92,000 SF $2 $184,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 92,000 SF $3 $276,000
5 New Community Building 12,500 SF $650 $8,125,000
6 Plaza Area 20,500 SF $20 $410,000
7 Sidewalks 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
8 Seatwall 300 LF $75 $22,500
9 Asphalt Drop Off 4,300 SF $20 $86,000
10 Event Lawn Area and Irrigation 7,700 SF $8 $61,600
11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 45,700 SF $10 $457,000 12 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 13 Utilities 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
14 Signage 1 LS $8,000 $8,000
Subtotal $9,860,100
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $2,465,025 TOTAL $12,325,125
L Dog Park
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 115,000 SF $2 $230,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 115,000 SF $3 $345,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 15,000 SF $25 $375,000
6 Decomposed Granite Area 35,000 SF $8 $280,000
7 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $25,000 $50,000
8 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $7,500 $7,500 9 Lawn Area and Irrigation 60,000 SF $8 $480,000
10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 5,000 SF $10 $50,000 11 Signage 1 LS $3,000 $3,000
12 Utilities 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
13 Fencing 1,200 LF $50 $60,000
Subtotal $1,920,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $480,125 TOTAL $2,400,625
M Trails and Fitness Loop
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 3 Site Demolition 3,100,000 SF $0.5 $1,550,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 3,100,000 SF $0.5 $1,550,000 5 Multi Use Path (Asphalt @ 10' wide, 3 miles long) 157,000 SF $10 $1,570,000 6 Decomposed Granite Paving/ Pathways (6' wide, 2miles long) 63,200 SF $5 $316,000 7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 8 Fitness Loop Equipment 1 LS $200,000 $200,000
9 Regevetation/ Temp Irrigation 2,879,000 SF $0.5 $1,439,500 10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2 SF $8 $16
11 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 12 Utilities 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 75,000 SF $2 $150,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 75,000 SF $3 $225,000
5 Performance Stage 1 LS $150,000 $150,000
6 Paving / Walways 7,500 SF $25 $187,500
7 Event Lawn Area and Irrigation 60,000 SF $8 $480,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 7,500 SF $10 $75,000 9 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 10 Utilities 1 LS $125,000 $125,000
11 Signage 1 LS $2,500 $2,500
12 Fencing 500 LF $50 $25,000
Subtotal $1,460,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $365,000 TOTAL $1,825,000
J Playground and Adventure Playground (Near Clubhouse) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 44,000 SF $2 $88,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 44,000 SF $3 $132,000
5 Play Ground (Equipment and Surfacing) 1 LS $850,000 $850,000 6 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $40,000 $80,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 8 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 3,000 SF $20 $60,000
9 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2,500 SF $5 $12,500 10 Utilities 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
11 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
12 Fencing 1,200 LF $50 $60,000
Subtotal $1,432,500
9 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 10 Utilities 1 LS $125,000 $125,000
11 Signage 1 LS $2,500 $2,500
12 Fencing 500 LF $50 $25,000
Subtotal $1,460,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $365,000 TOTAL $1,825,000
J Playground and Adventure Playground (Near Clubhouse) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 44,000 SF $2 $88,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 44,000 SF $3 $132,000
5 Play Ground (Equipment and Surfacing) 1 LS $850,000 $850,000 6 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $40,000 $80,000
7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 8 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 3,000 SF $20 $60,000
9 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2,500 SF $5 $12,500 10 Utilities 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
11 Signage 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
12 Fencing 1,200 LF $50 $60,000
Subtotal $1,432,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $358,125 TOTAL $1,790,625
K Community Faclities/ Events Staging
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 3 Site Demolition 92,000 SF $2 $184,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 92,000 SF $3 $276,000
5 New Community Building 12,500 SF $650 $8,125,000
6 Plaza Area 20,500 SF $20 $410,000
7 Sidewalks 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
8 Seatwall 300 LF $75 $22,500
9 Asphalt Drop Off 4,300 SF $20 $86,000
10 Event Lawn Area and Irrigation 7,700 SF $8 $61,600
11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 45,700 SF $10 $457,000 12 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 13 Utilities 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
14 Signage 1 LS $8,000 $8,000
Subtotal $9,860,100
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $2,465,025 TOTAL $12,325,125
L Dog Park
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 115,000 SF $2 $230,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 115,000 SF $3 $345,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 15,000 SF $25 $375,000
6 Decomposed Granite Area 35,000 SF $8 $280,000
7 Shade Structure Shelter 2 EA $25,000 $50,000
8 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $7,500 $7,500 9 Lawn Area and Irrigation 60,000 SF $8 $480,000
10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 5,000 SF $10 $50,000 11 Signage 1 LS $3,000 $3,000
12 Utilities 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
13 Fencing 1,200 LF $50 $60,000
Subtotal $1,920,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $480,125 TOTAL $2,400,625
M Trails and Fitness Loop
1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 3 Site Demolition 3,100,000 SF $0.5 $1,550,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 3,100,000 SF $0.5 $1,550,000 5 Multi Use Path (Asphalt @ 10' wide, 3 miles long) 157,000 SF $10 $1,570,000 6 Decomposed Granite Paving/ Pathways (6' wide, 2miles long) 63,200 SF $5 $316,000 7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 8 Fitness Loop Equipment 1 LS $200,000 $200,000
9 Regevetation/ Temp Irrigation 2,879,000 SF $0.5 $1,439,500 10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2 SF $8 $16
11 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 12 Utilities 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
| 49
ATTACHMENT A 1979
MASTER PLAN COST OPINION
7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 564,000 SF $4 $2,256,000 8 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
9 Utilities1 LS $15,000 $15,000
10 Fencing 9,000 LF $50 $450,000
Subtotal $5,574,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,393,500 TOTAL $6,967,500
P Parking Area 1 - Near Community Center 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 33,000 SF $25 $825,000
7 Curb and Gutter 700 LF $40 $28,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 6,000 SF $8 $48,000 9 Utilities1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 Signage1 LS $4,000 $4,000
Subtotal $1,138,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $284,500 TOTAL $1,422,500
Q Parking Area 2- Near Multi Purpose Lawn and Playground 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 58,000 LS $1 $58,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 58,000 LS $1 $58,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 3,000 SF $15 $45,000
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 52,000 SF $25 $1,300,000
7 Curb and Gutter 1,600 LF $40 $64,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 3,000 SF $8 $24,000 9 Utilities1 LS $80,000 $80,000
10 Signage1 LS $4,000 $4,000
Subtotal $1,643,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $410,750 TOTAL $2,053,750
R Parking Area 3 - Near Event Area 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 30,000 LS $1 $30,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 30,000 LS $1 $30,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 1,500 SF $15 $22,500
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 26,500 SF $25 $662,500
7 Curb and Gutter 800 LF $40 $32,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2,000 SF $8 $16,000 9 Utilities1 LS $50,000 $50,000
10 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
Subtotal $856,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $214,000 13 Signage1 LS $2,500 $2,500
14 Fencing 10,000 LF $50 $500,000
Subtotal $7,283,016
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,820,754 TOTAL $9,103,770
N Neighborhood Park - West End 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 46,000 SF $1 $46,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 46,000 SF $3 $138,000
5 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 8,200 SF $30 $246,000
6 Curb and Gutter 200 LF $40 $8,000
7 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 5,000 SF $20 $100,000
8 Play Ground (Equipment and Surfacing)1 LS $200,000 $200,000 9 Shade Structure Shelter1 EA $15,000 $15,000
10 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.)1 LS $7,500 $7,500 11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 5,000 SF $8 $40,000 12 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
13 Utilities1 LS $5,000 $5,000
14 Fencing 400 LF $50 $20,000
Subtotal $853,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $213,375 TOTAL $1,066,875
O Linear Park 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance
1 LS $15,000 $15,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 650,000 SF $1.0 $650,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 650,000 LS $2.0 $1,300,000 5 Multi Use Path (Asphalt @ 10 wide) 86,000 SF $10 $860,000 6 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.)1 LS $15,000 $15,000 7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 564,000 SF $4 $2,256,000 8 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
9 Utilities1 LS $15,000 $15,000
10 Fencing 9,000 LF $50 $450,000
Subtotal $5,574,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,393,500 TOTAL $6,967,500
P Parking Area 1 - Near Community Center 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 33,000 SF $25 $825,000
7 Curb and Gutter 700 LF $40 $28,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 6,000 SF $8 $48,000 9 Utilities1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 Signage1 LS $4,000 $4,000
Subtotal $1,138,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $284,500 TOTAL $1,422,500
10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 5,000 SF $10 $50,000 11 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
12 Utilities1 LS $15,000 $15,000
13 Fencing 1,200 LF $50 $60,000
Subtotal $1,920,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $480,125 TOTAL $2,400,625
M Trails and Fitness Loop 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $30,000 $30,000 3 Site Demolition 3,100,000 SF $0.5 $1,550,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 3,100,000 SF $0.5 $1,550,000 5 Multi Use Path (Asphalt @ 10' wide, 3 miles long) 157,000 SF $10 $1,570,000 6 Decomposed Granite Paving/ Pathways (6' wide, 2miles long) 63,200 SF $5 $316,000 7 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.)1 LS $30,000 $30,000 8 Fitness Loop Equipment1 LS $200,000 $200,000
9 Regevetation/ Temp Irrigation 2,879,000 SF $0.5 $1,439,500 10 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2 SF $8 $16
11 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.)1 LS $15,000 $15,000 12 Utilities1 LS $50,000 $50,000
13 Signage1 LS $2,500 $2,500
14 Fencing 10,000 LF $50 $500,000
Subtotal $7,283,016
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,820,754 TOTAL $9,103,770
N Neighborhood Park - West End 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 46,000 SF $1 $46,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 46,000 SF $3 $138,000
5 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 8,200 SF $30 $246,000
6 Curb and Gutter 200 LF $40 $8,000
7 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 5,000 SF $20 $100,000
8 Play Ground (Equipment and Surfacing)1 LS $200,000 $200,000 9 Shade Structure Shelter1 EA $15,000 $15,000
10 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.)1 LS $7,500 $7,500 11 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 5,000 SF $8 $40,000 12 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
13 Utilities1 LS $5,000 $5,000
14 Fencing 400 LF $50 $20,000
Subtotal $853,500
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $213,375 TOTAL $1,066,875
O Linear Park 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance
1 LS $15,000 $15,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $10,000 $10,000 3 Site Demolition 650,000 SF $1.0 $650,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 650,000 LS $2.0 $1,300,000 5 Multi Use Path (Asphalt @ 10 wide) 86,000 SF $10 $860,000 6 Site Furnishings (Trash Receptacle, Benches, Bike Racks, etc.)1 LS $15,000 $15,000 7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 564,000 SF $4 $2,256,000 8 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
9 Utilities1 LS $15,000 $15,000
10 Fencing 9,000 LF $50 $450,000
Subtotal $5,574,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,393,500 TOTAL $6,967,500
P Parking Area 1 - Near Community Center 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 33,000 SF $25 $825,000
7 Curb and Gutter 700 LF $40 $28,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 6,000 SF $8 $48,000 9 Utilities1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 Signage1 LS $4,000 $4,000
Subtotal $1,138,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $284,500 TOTAL $1,422,500
7 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 564,000 SF $4 $2,256,000 8 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
9 Utilities1 LS $15,000 $15,000
10 Fencing 9,000 LF $50 $450,000
Subtotal $5,574,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $1,393,500 TOTAL $6,967,500
P Parking Area 1 - Near Community Center 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 44,000 LS $1 $44,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 5,000 SF $15 $75,000
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 33,000 SF $25 $825,000
7 Curb and Gutter 700 LF $40 $28,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 6,000 SF $8 $48,000 9 Utilities1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 Signage1 LS $4,000 $4,000
Subtotal $1,138,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $284,500 TOTAL $1,422,500
Q Parking Area 2- Near Multi Purpose Lawn and Playground 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 58,000 LS $1 $58,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 58,000 LS $1 $58,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 3,000 SF $15 $45,000
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 52,000 SF $25 $1,300,000
7 Curb and Gutter 1,600 LF $40 $64,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 3,000 SF $8 $24,000 9 Utilities1 LS $80,000 $80,000
10 Signage1 LS $4,000 $4,000
Subtotal $1,643,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $410,750 TOTAL $2,053,750
R Parking Area 3 - Near Event Area 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Demolition 30,000 LS $1 $30,000
4 Earthwork, Site Work Grading 30,000 LS $1 $30,000
5 Paving - Pedestrian Concrete 1,500 SF $15 $22,500
6 Paving - Vehicular Asphalt 26,500 SF $25 $662,500
7 Curb and Gutter 800 LF $40 $32,000
8 Landscape Planting and Irrigation 2,000 SF $8 $16,000 9 Utilities1 LS $50,000 $50,000
10 Signage1 LS $3,000 $3,000
Subtotal $856,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $214,000 TOTAL $1,070,000
S Parking Area 4 - Renovation of Existing Parking 1 Mobilization/Demob, Bonding, Insurance 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 Temporary Fencing, Erosion Controls, Fencing1 LS $5,000 $5,000 3 Site Preparation 105,000 SF $1 $105,000
4 Paving Resurfacing - Vehicular Asphalt 101,000 SF $10 $1,010,000 5 Curb and Gutter 800 LF $40 $32,000
6 Landscape Planting and Irrigation Modification 4,000 SF $4 $16,000 7 Utilities1 LS $45,000 $45,000
8 Signage1 LS $4,000 $4,000
Subtotal $1,222,000
25% Contingency (Includes Design and Engineering) $305,500 TOTAL $1,527,500
50 |
ATTACHMENT A 1980
| 51
ATTACHMENT A 1981
Prepared by
128 MARKET STREET, SUITE 3E
STATELINE, NEVADA 89449
775.588.5929
ATTACHMENT A 1982
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND ECOSYSTEM
VALUES OF THE VAN BUSKIRK GOLF COURSE
VAN BUSKIRK GOLF COURSE RE-USE STUDY
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
ATTACHMENT B 1983
This page intentionally left blank.
ATTACHMENT B 1984
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND ECOSYSTEM
VALUES OF THE VAN BUSKIRK GOLF COURSE
VAN BUSKIRK GOLF COURSE RE-USE STUDY
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
Submitted to:
4825 J Street, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95819
Prepared by:
LSA
157 Park Place
Pt. Richmond, California 94801
510.236.6810
Project No. DEW2102
ATTACHMENT B 1985
This page intentionally left blank.
ATTACHMENT B 1986
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
S.1 INTRODUCTION
The Van Buskirk Park (“Park”) is a 192.71-acre former golf course located at 1740 Houston Avenue, Stockton, CA 95206, along the north bank of Walker Slough, French Camp Slough, and the San Joaquin River (Figure 1). The City of Stockton (City) is planning the rehabilitation and reuse of the Park for active and passive outdoor recreational facilities, programs, and activities. The City’s core vision for the Park is to enhance the public space to provide opportunities for residents and visitors to engage and to provide quantifiable economic and social justice benefits1 to the City and neighborhood.
DesignWorkshop and LSA have been tasked to develop a Master Plan for the Van Buskirk Park. The purpose of this assessment is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Park’s Biological Resources that may be relevant to permitting or mitigation pursuant to Federal (ESA) or State Law (CESA, CEQA).
This report is structured in three Parts. Part 1 contains relevant data, analysis and conclusions for biological resources pursuant to the CEQA “Checklist”. This section is intended to inform subsequent CEQA analyses and documents. Part 2 contains additional analyses regarding the Park’s unique ecosystem values, current risks, and opportunities for mitigation and restoration. Part 3 contains recommendations for future management of the natural resources of the Park.
Consideration of flood risk and opportunities to address climate change and carbon sequestration is also a goal of this report. The Park is located in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) XFlood Zone, and climate change hydrology in concert with the predicted sea level rise is likely to cause more than a 7-foot increase in future water surface elevation. It is unlikely that the existing levees at the Park will be able to protect the adjoining neighborhoods from flooding of that magnitude.
S.2 METHODS
For planning purposes, the Park was divided into two planning strata. The “west” stratum includes
81.6 acres beginning at the eastern edge of the central parking area (including the former golf club buildings) and extending to the western border of the site (Figure 2). The “east” stratum comprises 78 acres and extends from the parking lot eastwards to the fence line of the Van Buskirk Community Center. LSA conducted field surveys, mapping, database review, and modeling to evaluate the Park’s environmental conditions and functions. A breeding bird and wildlife habitat survey was conducted to characterize the habitat types and wildlife species in the Park, including wetlands or special-status species.
1 Social justice benefits of urban forests and parks include filtering air pollution, absorbing flood and rainwater and providing shade/cooling. Urban trees also may reduce stress and blood pressure, and increase mental engagement, attentiveness and happiness. Communities with large street trees often have lower crime and slower traffic.
ATTACHMENT B 1987
LSA conducted a complete vegetation and habitat inventory of the Park. Tree inventory data were analyzed using the i-Tree Eco© software program, to quantify the current conditions at the Park, including urban forest structure, environmental effects, and value to communities. The i-Tree Eco software program provides estimates of the urban forest structure, such as species composition; number of trees, tree density, tree health condition, leaf area, total tree biomass, total carbon stored, and net carbon annually sequestered by the urban forest. The program also allows for calculation of the hourly amount of pollution removed by the urban forest, and associated percent air quality improvement throughout a year; as well as public health benefits and the economic value that is associated with the incidence of adverse health effects. Other parameters evaluated include oxygen production, avoided runoff, and bio-emissions (e.g., volatile organic compounds, ozone and carbon monoxide).
S.3 PART1: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT
S.3.1.1 Wildlife
Mammalian wildlife present at the Park includes California pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae), California voles (Microtus californicus), and California ground squirrels. California ground squirrels are considered keystone species and are the primary natural source of burrows for burrowing owls.
Ground squirrel burrows are also important for providing subterranean habitat for amphibians and many species of invertebrates, including native bumblebees. Expanding ground squirrel distribution in the Park provides additional opportunities to support burrowing owl populations. The site is also frequented by common mammals, such as striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), raccoon (Procyon locator), grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), American mink (Neovison vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) – the latter predominantly using habitats on the waterside of the levees. Feral domestic cats (Felis catus) are observed frequently on the site (LSA observations). The species of bat that will most likely occupy the Park are the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus), the Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis), and the Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis).
The ponds at the Park may contain non-native red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta). Since the ponds have fallen dry, these non-native turtles have moved to the banks of French Camp Slough.
The red-eared slider is a popular pet turtle and is introduced primarily through pet releases and escapes; it is an invasive species in California and considered as one of the “World's Worst Invasive Alien Species” by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) Invasive Species Specialist Group (Lowe et al. 2000). During field surveys, LSA also observed pacific tree frogs (Pseudacris regilla), also known as the Pacific chorus frog, a wide ranging species that occupies many types of habitats, reproducing in aquatic settings. American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) has also been observed on the Park site. This non-native, invasive species compete with native species for space and food. They are voracious predators of turtle hatchlings and other amphibians.
The Park currently has an abundance of flowering non-native eucalyptus trees, although other flowering forbs and shrubs are rare. LSA biologists observed numerous bees and butterflies (mainly Western Swallowtail, Papilio rutulus). With restoration and habitat enhancement, the site could provide an ideal habitat area to contribute to monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus, federally classified as a Candidate for listing) and pollinator conservation. Pollinator and monarch populations ATTACHMENT B 1988
have declined significantly over the past 20 years due to habitat loss, pesticides, and intensifying climate events. The eastern portion of the Park provides the greatest opportunity to establish pollinator habitat through the planting of pollinator and butterfly gardens, hedgerows and other native areas.
S.3.2 Potential Impacts to biological resources
S.3.2.1 Special-Status Plant and Animal species
Species listed/candidate under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) or listed/proposed the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) require special protection to avoid “take” or cause other adverse effects upon their habitat. Additionally, impacts to other non-listed special status species, such as those classified as Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife should be avoided and mitigated under CEQA. Some rare plant species also require protection pursuant to the California Native Plant Protection Act. The following species could potentially occur at the park (Figure 5):
The monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is a migratory butterfly that has been listed as a candidate for inclusion on the USFWS list of endangered and threatened wildlife since December 2020. Monarch butterflies are listed by the State of California as a California Special Resource because their overwintering habitat is threatened by disturbance and by alteration and destruction of habitat. Monarch butterfly overwintering sites are typically found in a narrow stretch of land within 3 miles of the Pacific coastline. The likelihood that the monarch butterfly is overwintering in the project site is considered to be none. Monarch butterfly relies exclusively on milkweed species as a larval host plant. No milkweed plants have been identified during biological surveys of the site.
Milkweed plants, however, may be present in the project action area; therefore, monarch larvae may be present as well. The likelihood that monarch butterfly is present in the project area is considered to be moderate. The Mitigation Measures for Monarch butterfly (BIO-6) are designed to avoid impacts to milkweed and monarch butterfly to a less than significant level. With restoration and habitat enhancement (Measure BIO-9), the site could provide an ideal habitat area to contribute to monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) and pollinator conservation. The eastern section of the Park provides the greatest opportunity to establish pollinator habitat through the planting of pollinator and butterfly gardens, hedgerows, and other areas where nectar plants could be established. Therefore, the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, monarch butterfly. The overall impact is Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation.
The Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (Desmoderus californicus) has been observed to occur at the Park (LSA unpubl. observations) and at the nearby VELB conservation bank (CNDDB 2022).. The likelihood that valley elderberry longhorn beetle is present in the project area is considered to be high. The project will avoid all elderberry shrubs, and construction activities will keep a minimum distance of 20 feet from the drip lines of the shrubs. Mitigation measure BIO-7 is designed to avoid impacts to elderberry bushes and the VELB. The proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, this species. The overall impact is Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation.
Western Bumble Bee (Bombus occidentalis) and Crotch Bumble Bee (Bombus crotchii) are California candidate species and thus receive the same legal protection afforded to endangered or threatened ATTACHMENT B 1989
species (Fish & G. Code, §§ 2074.2 & 2085. There is suitable bumble bee foraging and nesting habitat and nectar plants within the project site, and therefore the potential for Crotch’s and western bumble bees to occur in the project area is moderate. The implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-4 will avoid potential impacts to Western and Crotch’s bumble bee. In addition, Mitigation Measure BIO-9 (Pollinator Habitat Restoration) limits all herbaceous vegetation removal activities from September 1 through February 28. The overall impact is Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation
Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) is a California Species of Special Concern. There is suitable habitat present at the Park, but no owls have been observed. Records of burrowing owls exist from within a 1-mile radius around the Park (CNDDB 2022). The likelihood that burrowing owl is present in the project area is considered to be low. Measure BIO-4 is designed to reduce any potential adverse effect on burrowing owl from implementing the project. The overall impact is Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation.
The Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsonii) is State-listed as threatened and Bird of Conservation Concern. The likelihood that Swainson’s hawk is present in the project area is considered very high. The implementation of Measures BIO-1 through 4 will avoid and minimize effects on Swainson’s hawk during habitat restoration and maintenance activities associated with the project.
Therefore, the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, Swainson’s hawk. The overall impact is Less Than Significant with Mitigation.
Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor) is state-listed as threatened and a CDFW Species of Special Concern. No recent observations have been recorded, therefore the potential of tricolored blackbird being present is low. Measures BIO-1-4 avoid impacts to tricolored blackbirds. This will reduce any potential impacts to Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation.
Other Birds: Birds protected under the California Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) could potentially nest on or near the property; however, as long as the project complies with provisions of the MBTA, California Fish and Game Code Section 3513 and Measures Bio-1 through Bio-4, the project will not affect any protected nesting birds or violate the MBTA or California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, nesting birds. The overall impact is Less Than Significant with Mitigation.
The western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata) is the only native freshwater turtle of the pacific coastal states. Suitable habitat for foraging, nesting, and hibernation occurs on and adjacent to the Park, but the presence of non-native red-eared sliders may have affect Western pond turtle use of any potential habitat. Currently, the potential of Western Pond turtle being present is low Measures BIO-1- through BIO-5 avoid impacts to western pond turtle. This will reduce any potential impacts to Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation.
Bats. Currently, there are no records of various bat observations at the Park, but bats are highly likely to occur at the site. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-6 would reduce this impact to less-than significant by first identifying the presence or absence of roosting bats, and if present, preventing disturbance or loss of roosting habitat. The proposed project may affect but is not ATTACHMENT B 1990
likely to adversely affect various bat species. The overall impact is Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation.
Critical habitat areas are defined in the Endangered Species Act and used by US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service as an area that is essential for the conservation and recovery of a federally threatened or endangered species that requires special management and protection. The following species have designated critical habitat or adjacent to the Park:
• The southern Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of Green Sturgeon. Project actions are limited to terrestrial and aquatic habitat behind the levees and therefore, Therefore, the project will have no adverse effect on critical habitat for green sturgeon. • the Central Valley steelhead is currently listed as threatened under the ESA. Because the project will not include actions that are outside the levees, there will be no adverse effect on critical habitat for Steelhead.
S.3.2.2 Wetlands
There are five ponds within the former golf course, of which some or all may be historical oxbows associated with French Camp Slough. Four of these ponds are on the western stratum of the Park (Figure 3). Pond 5 is isolated from Ponds 1 through 4. All ponds at the Park are isolated from the floodplain of French Camp Slough by a levee and are considered managed water features that are jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and the State of California. The total area of these ponds is approximately 11.25 acres (Table C). The Conceptual Plan does not specify any changes to existing ponds. Therefore, the proposed project would have no effect on any federally protected wetlands.
S.3.2.3 Tree Protection
The City of Stockton has a Heritage Tree Ordinance that requires a permit for the removal of any “Heritage Tree” (i.e., Quercus lobata, Quercus agrifolia, and Quercus wislizenii) which is located on public or private property within the limits of the City, and which has a trunk diameter of 16 inches or more, measured at 24 inches above actual grade. There are a total of nine mature California valley oak (Quercus lobata) trees on the project site ( 4 on the eastern side, 5 on the western side).
All five valley oak trees on the western side of the Park and three out of four oaks on the eastern side meet this requirement. The City will need to authorize the removal of these oaks if it is determined that they are located within the footprint of a planned development.
S.3.2.4 Habitat conservation plans
The Park is within the coverage area of the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Open Space and Habitat Conservation Plan (SJMSCP). Certain portions of the Conceptual Master Plan would qualify as conversion of open space to non-open space (e.g., parking lots, event facilities, skate park and other hardscape features, and therefore may require compliance with the SJMSCP mitigation fee policy. On the other hand, the available mitigation opportunities at the Park may also constitute onsite mitigation opportunities or offer to implement mitigation for impacts incurred. Therefore, the ATTACHMENT B 1991
Project would have a less than-significant impact on local policy compliance. The degree to which mitigation is required would need to be determined once a development plan has been finalized.
S.4 PART 2: ECOSYSTEM VALUES OF VAN BUSKIRK PARK
S.4.1.1 Forest Condition
LSA inventoried 977 live trees of 35 different species with the Park’s urban forest. Species exotic to North America make up 82 percent of the population. The most abundant tree species are river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis), cork oak (Quercus suber) and Canary Pine (Pinus canariensis). The overall tree density is 2.5 trees per acre, or 6 percent tree cover (i.e., 9.6 acres of the entire site), which is low for urban forests in general. The species contributing the largest proportions of total leaf area were red river gum (54.38 acres) red ironbark gum (Eucalyptus sideroxylon, 30.71 acres), and cork oak (15.62 acres). The most abundant native California species surveyed is valley oak (Quercus lobata).
The urban forest at the Park provides a number of significant environmental benefits to the surrounding community. For example, it stores a significant amount of carbon, providing a gross sequestration of about 17.71 tons of carbon per year with an associated value of $3,020 per year.
The amount of carbon stored in the forest is estimated at 991 tons of carbon at a value of $169,000, or the equivalent of the annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from 701 vehicles or 287 singlefamily homes. Additionally, the trees and shrubs of the Park help to reduce stormwater runoff by an estimated 1,240 cubic meters (approximately 1 acre-foot) a year with an associated value of $2,900.
Another environmental benefit of the Park’s urban forest at is oxygen production and removal of air pollutants. It produces an estimated 42.85 metric tons of oxygen per year. Cork oak is the most prolific oxygen producer in the Park with an annual production of over 6 metric tons, exceeding the oxygen production of the more numerous eucalyptus species. Pollution removal was greatest in the months of April through September. Trees at the Park remove 1,604 pounds of air pollution, including ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) with an associated value of $3,550 per year. The annual nitrogen dioxide removal is equivalent to emissions from 20 vehicles or nine single-family houses.
The sulfur dioxide removal is equivalent to the annual sulfur dioxide emissions from 450 vehicles.
Particulate matter is being filtered primarily during the rainy season. The Park’s canopy also contributes to urban cooling by providing shade and evaporative cooling.
However, the urban forest can also contribute to air pollution Its trees emit an estimated 3.425 metric tons of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) annually, which are important precursor chemicals to ozone formation. Furthermore, VOCs affect tree flammability and may contribute to accelerating forest fires. Fifty-five percent of the forest's VOC emissions were from the eucalyptus species, primarily red river gum and red ironbark.
The potential for wildfires at the Park has increase in recent years. Historically, the Park’s management as a golf course has kept the fire risk low by extensive mowing, pruning and irrigation; however, these conditions no longer exist. As a result, fuel loads have increased. In the future, dense clumps of invasive tree saplings are expected to emerge underneath many of the eucalyptus trees. Coupled with highly flammable trees, these invasive saplings are likely to cause a significant ATTACHMENT B 1992
fire risk associated with longer flames, quicker surface fires, and crowning of fires in closed canopies. The abundance of highly flammable species is greater in the west stratum (72 percent highly flammable species) compared to the east stratum (51 percent of highly flammable species; Figure 6). Given the close proximity of residential structures that are often less than 30 feet from the canopy’s dripline, there is limited defensible space for the adjoining community. A potential wildfire in the urban forest at the Park under current conditions will pose a substantial fire risk to the community. Implementing a fire break along Houston Avenue should be considered a high priority.
This fire-break should be free of large flammable vegetation and be at least 120 feet wide, measured from the edge of the pavement.
S.4.1.2 Forest Restoration
Three forecasting models were designed to simulate future management options for the Park’s urban forest:
Option 1: The Baseline Scenario forecasts future conditions without forest restoration or replanting of trees. Under this scenario, about 600 trees will disappear due to natural mortality over 30 years, resulting in a reduction of tree cover by 52 to 58 percent, respectively, for the east and west stratum. The forest structure at the Park will become more open and savannah-like, with large gaps between trees becoming the prevalent characteristic of the urban forest. This will reduce the shaded areas and allow more sunlight to penetrate the canopy, enhancing weed and brush encroachment. The remaining forest will likely be dominated by those species that continue to thrive, and even reproduce under the predicted future conditions.
Species that reproduce naturally at the Park include the majority of eucalyptus species. Recruitment and expansion of willows will also occur naturally and is already underway in many of the drying ponds. Most likely, future composition of trees at the Park will be dominated by the two most drought-tolerant species, river red gum and red ironbark. It is also expected that most oaks will persist, although not likely reproduce. Simulations suggest that under the baseline conditions, carbon storage will decline from 991 tons to 548 tons, which amounts to a total loss of 45 percent of the stored carbon. Thus, without active replacement of dying or dead trees, the Park will convert from an active sequestration of carbon to a net emitter of CO2. Pollution removal will likewise decline, with the most drastic reduction in ecosystem services being a 55 percent loss in particulate matter interception (PM2.5) and ozone removal. The monetary value of the pollution removal services of the Park will decline by almost $2,000 per year.
Option 2: The “Maintain Ecosystem Benefits” Scenario includes planting 100 replacement trees annually in each stratum for 10 years. Option 2 is designed to require minimum effort and cost to maintain the forest at a similar density and distribution, reduce fire risk, and ensure that most of the ecosystem services continue to be available into the future.
Tree species will be limited to native, site-appropriate species, and management actions will entail control of ladder fuels and other fine fuels by pruning, mowing, and/or grazing. Planting of 100 saplings per year for 10 years will not immediately compensate for the loss of biomass and ecosystem services; the total tree biomass will decline from an initial value of 4,250 to approximately 2,800 metric tons. However, the percent tree cover will decline only marginally from 6 ATTACHMENT B 1993
percent to 5.75 percent during the 30-year forecasting period. Only 10 percent of the existing nonnative trees will remain after 30 years, many of which will be long-lived and fire-resilient species, such as cork oak and shamel ash.
Carbon storage will decline by approximately 10 percent by year 13 and then increase as young trees increase stored carbon. At the end of the forecasting period, the total carbon stored in the forest at the Park is expected to reach 108 percent of current, or equivalent to the emissions from 763 vehicles per year. Pollution removal will likewise decline initially but increase to approximately 175 percent of the current value. In addition, removing species with high-VOC emissions and replacing them with native species of low-VOC emission potential will further reduce the air pollution burden on the neighborhood of the Park. The fire-resilience of the native-species dominated forest resulting from Option 2 will be significantly higher, despite a more uneven-evenaged stand structure and more ladder fuels reaching into the canopy. Although ladder fuels will be more prevalent due to the abundance of young trees, the tree species themselves are less flammable and thus reduce the overall fire risk. Management actions to eliminate regrowth of nonnative species (e.g., eucalyptus) and selective removal of highly flammable species will further drive the trajectory towards a native-species-dominated system.
Option 3: The “Restoration and Enhancement” Scenario aims to recreate a native riparian forest ecosystem with increased tree cover throughout most of the west stratum and native forest conditions in the east. The strategy involves planting approximately 300 young native trees annually in each stratum for 10 years. Under this scenario, the existing forest at the Park will be largely converted into a drought-tolerant, fire-resistant native vegetation community with high structural and biotic diversity. The resulting semi-natural forest will effectively serve as a fire modification zone and serve as an outdoor classroom for students learning about native plants and animals. It will provide substantial ecosystem benefits to local residents and visitors. Tree cover will increase from 6 percent to 11 percent after 30 years. Depending on the management of existing wetlands (see below and Section 3.2) the recruitment of riparian species may resemble the natural condition of the Great Valley Riparian Forest.
The total tree biomass will initially decline slightly from 4,252 to about 3,200 metric tons by year 13 and then increase to reach 4,100 metric tons by year 30 (i.e., 96 percent of current total tree biomass). Tree cover will increase steadily from 6 percent to almost 11 percent during the 30-year forecasting period. At the end of the forecasting period, the total carbon stored in the forest at the Park is expected to reach 190 percent of current or the equivalent of the emissions from more than 1,700 vehicles per year. The increase in carbon sequestration will continue beyond the 30-year forecasting horizon at a steady rate, at approximately 56 metric tons per year, or the equivalent of the emissions from 44 vehicles per year.
Pollution removal under Option 3 will remain stable for about five years and then increase to approximately 420 percent of the current value. Although the number of trees will only have doubled over this period, the monetary value of the resulting forest’s removal of air pollution will have quadrupled. Most of the value of the forest’s annual pollution removal is due to interception of particulate matter (PM2.5); that ecosystem service alone is worth over $12,900 per year and would have significant benefits for public health. In addition, removing species with high-VOC emissions and replacing them with native species of low-VOC emission potential will further reduce the air ATTACHMENT B 1994
pollution burden on the neighborhood of the Park. Under Option 3, the fire risk will be greatly reduced due to more site-adapted and less-flammable species making up the bulk of the forest. This will create a “Fire Modification Zone” where fire behavior will likely change, and fires will be less intense and threatening.
S.4.1.3 Wetlands Conditions
There are five ponds within the former golf course, some or all of which may be historical oxbows associated with French Camp Slough. Four of these ponds are located in the western section of the Park. Pond 5 is located in the east stratum and is isolated from Ponds 1-4. During the operation of the golf course, river water was pumped into Pond 5 from a different diversion than for Ponds 1 through 4. Ponds 1 through 4 are currently connected via pipes and culverts, many of which are in poor condition.
All ponds at the Park are isolated from the floodplain of French Camp Slough by a levee. They are considered a managed water feature and jurisdictional wetlands of the U.S. by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and of the State of California. The total area of these wetlands is approximately
11.25 acres. The ponds are generally shallow and current inundation is mainly due to seasonal winter rains. Pond bottoms consist of a substantial layer of river sediment (e.g., fine silts and clays) and during dry periods excessive cracking of the pond bottoms has been noted. Sediment accumulations in the ponds is generally associated with sediment toxicity caused by pyrethroid pesticides, primarily Bifenthrin discharges originating from farmland. In addition, runoff from the golf course greens may have contributed additional urban toxic contaminants (e.g., herbicides, fertilizers, algaecides) that were applied during the operation of the golf course. As discussed later in this report (Section 3.2.1 below), sediment removal from these ponds is the preferred method to detoxify these types of wetlands.
The primary vegetation at the Park’s wetlands is a remnant wetland community that is currently undergoing a rapid transition into ruderal characteristics due to the lack of inundation. Wetland plants, such as cattails and other pond vegetation, are declining and disappearing rapidly, while the former ponds are being invaded by herbaceous weeds and young saplings of willows and eucalyptus tree species. If left unmanaged, the ponds are likely to become dense stands of young trees of undesirable species. The fire risk associated with such dense stands of young, highly flammable trees is substantial. In addition, the ponds in their current condition do not provide quality wildlife habitat.
S.4.1.4 Wetland Restoration
The primary goal of wetland restoration is to restore native ecosystem functions and values to promote resilience, biodiversity, and species conservation. The challenges associated with restoring natural ecosystem processes in wetlands at the Park include: 1) the current hydrological separation from adjacent stream flows; 2) the lack of a continuous stream channel linking the individual ponds to convey water; and 3) the existing shallow ponds that are not deep enough to maintain sufficient inundation to support wetland vegetation communities. Channel restoration only applies to Ponds 1 through 4, as they are disconnected from Pond 5.
ATTACHMENT B 1995
S.4.1.5 Ponds 1 Through 4
Ponds 1 through 4 were originally created as golf course features interlinked by pipes and culverts.
Since abandonment of the golf course, the ponds have been maintained as individual water bodies without interlinking connections. This has resulted in the ponds silting in. The ponds’ proximity to each other and the past hydrological connection via pipes and culverts make them suitable to be considered as part of one cohesive, connected wetland complex. Restoring a functional wetland complex from Ponds 1 through 4 could include:
• Removing river sediment from the ponds to a depth that will allow the storage of rainwater for at least several months, and possibly recharging connection to the groundwater table. • Establishing natural channels linking the ponds with each other to establish functional flow regimes and to reduce siltation. Removal of all pipes and creating meandering open channels with natural banks and bottom substrate will establish a natural surface water connection between the ponds and can aid in increasing the functionality and extent of the wetlands.
Creating a connected wetland complex may generate significant wetland credits for mitigation. • Restoring natural riparian vegetation along the functioning wetlands. Re-establishing a riparian forest along the restored wetlands will aid in promoting biodiversity, special-status species habitat, and fire resilience.
Reconnecting the wetlands with high-water flows from French Camp Slough and the San Joaquin River to enhance the river’s floodplain. Originally, the site of the Park was located within the expansive floodplain of French Camp Slough and the San Joaquin River. However, subsequent creation of the RD 404 levee system resulted in isolation of the Park from the river floodplain.
Furthermore, the levee along French Camp Slough has hemmed-in the river and reduced its ability to disperse floodwaters across its former floodplain, thus increasing flows and energy during flood events. Two options for restoration of wetlands, hydrology, and floodplain include:
Option 1: Oxbow. Oxbows are remnant former stream channels that are no longer connected to the main flows of the river and are normally part of a dynamic and healthy stream/floodplain system. A restoration of a fully functional oxbow system at the Park would include the creation of connecting channels as well as removal of artificial structures such as berms, concrete weirs, culverts, pipes and other remnant infrastructure. Additionally, removal of sediment to deepen the ponds would be essential. The removed dredge materials could be used onsite for creating burrowing owl habitat mounds and for potentially filling in Pond 5. Nutrient removal and water quality enhancements are the primary benefits of a functioning oxbow wetland complex. Existing levees along French Camp Slough and the San Joaquin River would be maintained in their current configuration.
Option 2: Floodplain. Creating a fully functional floodplain at the Park would require removing, breaching or modifying the existing levee along the western portion of the Park and creating a setback levee to protect the adjoining neighborhoods. Channels would be excavated to connect to French Camp Slough and the San Joaquin River to accommodate peak flows that would spill into the oxbow wetlands, recharging water levels and providing nutrient flows. Depending on the design, such a floodplain could accommodate 2-year to 10-year floods, but generally an inundation ATTACHMENT B 1996
frequency of less than 5 years would best maintain ecological integrity and nutrient transport capacity of the floodplain.
Maintaining a functioning riparian belt along the restored wetlands would also be desirable.
Riparian vegetation could reduce the currently high fire risk to the neighboring communities. Fires in riparian areas are considered to be of lower intensity and occur less frequently than in the surrounding uplands. Penetration of upland fires also depends on the width of riparian zones; therefore, riparian forest can act as a buffer against fire. In addition, this restoration would provide additional effective protection from anticipated flooding in the future.
S.4.1.6 Pond 5
Pond 5 is the only wetland on the eastern portion of the Park. This irregularly shaped 2.6-acre feature is located approximately equidistant from the Community Center and the central parking lot (Figure 2). Pond 5 is sustainable as a wetland only if it can be deepened to retain moisture longer in years of sufficient rainfall. This option could also include reducing the footprint of the pond, deepening the remaining portion and restoring the hydrological function of the pond as seasonal wetland habitat. Removal of non-native vegetation, maintenance and periodic de-sedimentation would also be needed. A reduction in the overall surface of the pond would require compensatory mitigation for the loss of wetlands (which could be provided by restoring Ponds 1 through 4).
Removal of invasive weeds and the date palms along its fringes would create better wildlife habitat and aesthetic values.
Options for Pond 5 include:
• Option 1: Restore, consider creating a recreational fishing pond. Restoration of Pond 5 to a seasonal pond would require de-sedimentation and management of invasive vegetation along its edges. If native Western pond turtles use the pond, their presence could require additional permitting before maintenance activities could be conducted. If a public fishing pond is considered, this option would incur high maintenance demands and frequent restocking of the pond with live, catchable fish. In addition, occasional draining would likely be required to remove sediment, invasive weeds, and other non-native species (e.g., bullfrogs, released pet turtles). Periodic testing of water quality for toxic components would also be required. Risks of public fishing ponds are primarily related to safety, especially for small children, and to the likelihood of vandalism.
• Option 2: Reconfiguration as a skateboard or BMX park. Creating a skateboard or BMX park would entail installing hardened surfaces (concrete for a skatepark, decomposed granite for a BMX park) and would require the installation of drains to remove standing water after a rain event. If the pond is reconfigured as a skate/BMX park, the resulting loss of a jurisdictional wetland will require mitigation pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). It should be noted that the regulatory agencies (i.e., Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Fish and Wildlife) might oppose the conversion of a jurisdictional wetland into an upland use.
ATTACHMENT B 1997
• Option 3: Complete fill and re-use as terrestrial area. The pond could serve as a depository for excavated soils (e.g., from levee reconfiguration, wetland creation) and thus could be filled in to create a terrestrial area. Compensatory mitigation for the loss of the entire 2.6-acre wetland would be required. The wetland restoration in the west stratum could provide onsite selfmitigation. For the same reason stated above, the regulatory agencies might oppose this filling and re-use.
S.5 PART 3: MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
S.5.1 Fire Prevention
The Park’s existing urban forest is comprised of highly flammable, water-stressed trees. This vegetation, if left unmanaged, will increasingly consist of fine fuels, ladder fuels, and drought stressed trees, making a conflagration likely. Therefore, conversion of these current fire-prone conditions to more fire-resistant vegetation types is of utmost importance. The Park’s western stratum is uniquely suited to restoring the native floodplain, wetlands, and riparian forest conditions that originally existed in this location. In the eastern stratum, the prevalence of recreational uses and to the proximity to the Community Center requires a forest conversion strategy that is compatible with these uses. Recommendations for fire prevention measures include:
• Hazard tree removal and fine fuel management (short-term, mid-term). Hazard trees, especially those of highly flammable species provide large amounts of fuel. They should be removed wherever necessary and be replaced with groups of saplings of native species that are less fire prone (e.g., oaks, sycamores, buckeye etc.).
• Fine fuel management. Grasses and weeds can provide fine fuels that allow fires to start and traverse over open, treeless terrain. Goat or sheep grazing should be implemented to remove herbaceous vegetation (grasses and weeds) after they have cured (dried). The best time to start grazing the Park is at the end of May. Stubble height after grazing should be approximately 4 to 6 inches.
• Fuel breaks. Installing a fuel break along the Park boundary could increase the defensible space and threat to residential areas. Removing all trees and shrubs along the Park boundary should be implemented to create a fire break that is at least 100 feet wide. Setback levees can also be used as effective fire breaks where they are constructed for flood control. Implementing a fire break may also alleviate security concerns by increasing the visibility along the Park boundary. • Conversion from fire prone to fire resilient, native species composition. Underplanting the existing forest canopy with native species will enhance sapling survival and facilitate maintaining the ecosystem service benefits (e.g., urban cooling, carbon sequestration, pollution removal).
Resulting changes in the forest structure and composition towards a native Great valley Riparian Forest will contribute to fire resilience and lower management costs. • Fire action plan. Creating fire-safe conditions at the Park will require the development a prescriptive action plan incorporating ecological assessment, fire behavior and fuel modeling.
ATTACHMENT B 1998
S.5.2 Wetland Restoration
Currently, the Park is at risk of 7-foot increases in flood water above existing conditions, which will stress levees and may result in overtopping and extensive flooding. Wetland restoration at the western portion of the Park could abate this risk. Wetland restoration activities include the following modifications to Ponds 1 through 4:
• Deepening and removing river sediment to allow the storage of rainwater for at least several months, and possibly recharging connection to the groundwater table. • Establishing natural channels instead of the existing culverts to reverse the alteration of channel form, changes in flow regimes, and siltation.
• Restoring natural riparian vegetation along the functioning wetlands for promoting biodiversity, special-status species habitat and fire resilience.
• Reconnecting the wetlands with high-water flows from French Camp Slough and the San Joaquin River to enlarge the river’s floodplain, accommodating predicted peak flows. To maintain high ecological integrity and nutrient transport capacity, the frequency of inundation of the floodplain should be less than five years.
Channel restoration only applies to Ponds 1 through 4, as they are disconnected from Pond 5.
Restoration of Pond 5 would create a seasonal wetland without a hydrological connection to other wetlands. Alternative options to restoring pond 5 include: a) converting Pond 5 to a public fishing pond; b) creating a skate or BMX park by installing hardened surfaces (concrete for a skatepark, decomposed granite for a BMX park); or c) filling in Pond 5 to create a terrestrial area.
Compensatory mitigation for the loss of the entire 2.6-acre wetland would be required.
S.5.3 Wildlife Conservation
Major wildlife conservation objectives to consider in the redevelopment of the Van Buskirk Golf Course include:
• Support of rare, special-status and other protected species, including grassland and burrowing owl restoration, protection and enhancement of Swainson’s hawk foraging and nesting habitat, enhancement of Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle habitat, bat habitat conservation and enhancement of pollinator and butterfly habitat.
• Habitat enhancement through the management of urban forests, floodplains and riparian habitats that could create a multi-story canopy with high diversity. Retention of snags and “dead and down” woody debris (wherever possible) is important to maintain a functioning forest habitat. Habitat enhancement would increase biodiversity and support the goal of “Keeping common species common”.
• Aggressive management of invasive species throughout all areas of the Park, in particular wetlands should be kept free of invasive species as much as possible, including non-native animals such as released pet turtles, goldfish, bullfrogs, and feral domestic animals. Public information on the detrimental effects of these species should be provided in informational signage and interpretive displays.
ATTACHMENT B 1999
S.5.4 Mitigation Credit Generation
An important element of the wildlife conservation strategy is the creation of habitat mitigation credits for use by the City or the San Joaquin Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The goal of mitigation is to replace the exact function and value of specific habitats (e.g., biodiversity, flood abatement, fish habitat) that would be adversely affected by a proposed development project ideally on land within the same watershed. Mitigation projects often will restore the mitigation site and provide funding for in-perpetuity management and monitoring. This guaranteed funding makes mitigation projects the ideal vehicle to create sustainable and functioning habitat at the Park. Thus, mitigation for wetland impacts could be an integral part of the Master Plan for the Park. Potential mitigation credits generated from restoration of natural habitat at the Park include:
• Wetlands
• Riparian vegetation
• Elderberry bushes
• Delta smelt habitat
• Swainson’s hawk breeding and foraging habitat
• Burrowing owl breeding and foraging habitat
Once the preferred options for restoration at the Park have been determined, a detailed mitigation plan should be developed, identifying opportunities for on-site mitigation of project impacts and opportunities for mitigating off-site impacts.
ATTACHMENT B 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. i FIGURES AND TABLES ............................................................................................................................xv
1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 PART 1: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT ........................................................ 2-7
2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 2-7
2.2 Proposed Action................................................................................................................ 2-8
2.2.1 Project Location, Zoning ..................................................................................................... 2-8
2.3 Methods............................................................................................................................ 2-9
2.3.1 Database Review ................................................................................................................ 2-9
2.3.2 Wildlife Surveys................................................................................................................ 2-10
2.3.3 Vegetation Inventory........................................................................................................ 2-10
2.4 Regulatory Background................................................................................................... 2-11
2.4.1 Sensitive Land Cover Types .............................................................................................. 2-11
2.4.2 Special-status Species....................................................................................................... 2-12
2.5 Environmental Setting..................................................................................................... 2-14
2.5.1 Climate.............................................................................................................................. 2-14
2.5.2 Geology............................................................................................................................. 2-14
2.5.3 Topography and Hydrology .............................................................................................. 2-18
2.5.4 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................ 2-19
2.5.5 Wetlands........................................................................................................................... 2-21
2.5.6 Wildlife.............................................................................................................................. 2-22
2.6 Plan Development........................................................................................................... 2-24
2.6.1 Interested Parties ............................................................................................................. 2-24
2.6.2 Conceptual Plan................................................................................................................ 2-24
2.6.3 Potential Actions: ............................................................................................................. 2-24
3.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................... 3-26
3.1 Biological Resources........................................................................................................ 3-26
3.2 Mitigation Measures......................................................................................................... 3-1
4.0 PART 2: ECOSYSTEM VALUES OF THE VAN BUSKIRK PARK................................. 4-6
4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4-6
4.2 Project Area....................................................................................................................... 4-7
4.2.1 History ................................................................................................................................ 4-7
4.2.2 Neighborhood Characteristics and Project Context ........................................................... 4-7
4.2.3 Environmental Risk Setting................................................................................................. 4-9
4.2.4 Ecosystem Services........................................................................................................... 4-10
4.3 METHODS........................................................................................................................ 4-13
4.3.1 Vegetation Communities And Tree Inventory.................................................................. 4-13
4.3.2 i-Tree Eco.......................................................................................................................... 4-14
4.4 Urban Forest Assessment ............................................................................................... 4-17
4.4.1 Current Conditions ........................................................................................................... 4-17
4.4.2 Future Conditions Analysis............................................................................................... 4-23
4.5 Wetlands......................................................................................................................... 4-34 ATTACHMENT B 2001
4.5.1 Wetland Restoration........................................................................................................ 4-34
4.5.2 Ponds 1 Through 4........................................................................................................... 4-34
4.5.3 Pond 5.............................................................................................................................. 4-40
4.6 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 4-41
4.6.1 Prioritization .................................................................................................................... 4-41
4.6.2 Fire Prevention ................................................................................................................ 4-41
4.6.3 Wetland Restoration........................................................................................................ 4-43
4.6.4 Wildlife Conservation ...................................................................................................... 4-45
5.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 5-1 ATTACHMENT B 2002
FIGURES AND TABLES
FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Location .................................................................................................................1-3 Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map........................................................................................................1-4 Figure 3: Study Area on Aerial Imagery...............................................................................................1-5 Figure 4: Master Plan ........................................................................................................................2-17 Figure 5: CNDDB Occurrences within 1 Mile.......................................................................................3-1 Figure 6: Ecosystem Services and their relations to constituents of human well-being (Source: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005)................................................................. 4-11 Figure 7: Monthly Pollution Removal (kg) of the Current Forest at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California ..................................................................................................................4-21 Figure 8: Proportion of Trees in Three Flammability Categories for the West and East Stratum, respectively, at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California.............................................4-28 Figure 9: Projected Diameter at Breast Height (dbh) of Trees over a 30-Year Forecasting Period with Replanting.............................................................................................................4-29 Figure 10: Trunk Diameter Distribution (dbh) for the Urban Forest at Van Buskirk Park under Scenario 3 (Planting of 3,000 Saplings over 10 Years). ............................................................4-31 Figure 11: Carbon Storage Forecasted under the Baseline, Option 2 and Option 3 Scenarios ........4-32 Figure 12: Pollution Removal Value for Three Scenarios of Forest Restoration at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California .........................................................................................................4-33 Figure 13: Conceptual rendering of a fully functional floodplain ecosystem at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton (Option 2, West stratum).................................................................................4-37 Figure 14: Estimated Carbon sequestration (metric tons) of restoring 1 ha (2.4 ac) of riparian forest at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California (Source CREEC).............................................4-39 TABLES
Table A: Soils of the Van Buskirk Park, San Joaquin County, California ............................................2-15 Table B: Ponds at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California ................................................................. 2-21 Table C: Special-Status Species and Sensitive Natural Communities Occurring within 1 Mile of the Project Site.......................................................................................................................3-1 Table D: Neighborhood Characteristics, SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities Using CalEnviro Screen 3.0...................................................................................................................................4-9 Table E: Species Composition and Leaf Area for the 12 Most Abundant Tree Species in the Urban Forest at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California ...........................................................4-18 Table F: Tree Health and Average Crown Dieback at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California..........4-18 Table G: Carbon Storage of Various Tree Species at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California...........4-20 Table H: Volatile Organic Compound Emissions of Trees at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California ..................................................................................................................................4-22 Table I: Air Quality Health Impacts and Values of trees at Van Buskirk Park....................................4-23 Table J: Natural Recruitment and Fire Risk Potential for the 10 Most Abundant Tree Species in the Urban Forest at Van Buskirk Park, Stockton, California.................................................4-27 ATTACHMENT B 2003
This page intentionally left blank.
ATTACHMENT B 2004
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Van Buskirk Park, (“Park”) is a 192.71-acre former golf course (San Joaquin County APN:
16307036) located at 1740 Houston Avenue, Stockton, California 95206, along the north bank of Walker Slough, French Camp Slough, and the San Joaquin River (Figures 1-3). In 1957, Charles and Bertha Van Buskirk donated the property to the City of Stockton with a deed restriction limiting its use to “public recreation or public park purposes.” Most of the Park was developed as a golf course, completed in 1969. The 18-hole course featured 6,928 yards of golf from the longest tees for a par of 72. The golf course closed in 2019 due to declining golf use, increasing and unsustainable subsidy of operations, and significant unfunded deferred maintenance and repairs.
The City of Stockton is planning the rehabilitation and reuse of the Park for active and passive outdoor recreational facilities, programs, and activities. The City aims to develop a financially sustainable use of the Park that focuses on activities and facilities which improve the quality of life for Stockton’ residents and support City Council goals and strategies while staying in alignment with the City’s Long Term Financial Plan. The City’s core vision for the Park is to enhance the public space to provide opportunities that engage residents and visitors and will provide quantifiable economic and social justice2 benefits to the City and neighborhood.
This report is divided into three parts. Part 1 details the biological resources at the Park and the potential regulatory context of any modification of the Park’s features. The purpose of this Biological Resources Report (Report) is to evaluate the potential effects of the project on federally and State listed and proposed species and designated and proposed critical habitat, and to determine whether these species or habitats are likely to be adversely affected by the project pursuant to 50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §402.12 and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Part 2 of this document provides an in-depth review of the ecosystem values and benefits of the current conditions at the Park to the residents of the surrounding neighborhoods. The analysis summarizes a variety of tangible benefits and develops 3 scenarios how the delivery of these benefits may be affected by future management options. Part 3 contains recommendations for future management of the natural resources of the Park.
Consideration of flood risk and opportunities to address climate change and carbon sequestration is also a goal of this report. The Park is located in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) XFlood Zone, and climate change hydrology in concert with the predicted sea level rise is likely to cause more than a 7-foot increase in future water surface elevation. It is unlikely that the existing levees at the Park will be able to protect the adjoining neighborhoods from flooding of that magnitude.
2 Social justice benefits of urban forests and parks include filtering air pollution, absorbing flood and rainwater and providing shade/cooling. Urban trees also may reduce stress and blood pressure, and increase mental engagement, attentiveness and happiness. Communities with large street trees often have lower crime and slower traffic.
ATTACHMENT B 2005
Property
LEGEND
Study Area
SOURCE: Esri World Street Map (2021).
I:\DEW2002\GIS\Maps\Ecosystem Values Report\Figure 1_Regional Location.mxd (4/22/2021) FIGURE 1
Van Buskirk Golf Course Re-Use Study
Stockton, San Joaquin County, California
Regional Location
0 0.5 1
MILES
Property
Location
Property Vicinity
ATTACHMENT B 2006
West
LEGEND
Study Area
SOURCE: USGS: The National Map (05/2020).
I:\DEW2002\GIS\Maps\Ecosystem Values Report\Figure 2_USGS Topographic Map.mxd (4/22/2021) FIGURE 2
Van Buskirk Golf Course Re-Use Study
Stockton, San Joaquin County, California
USGS Topographic Map
0 1000 2000
FEET
Pond1
Pond 2
Pond 3
Pond 4
Pond 5
East
ATTACHMENT B 2007
LEGEND
Study Area
SOURCE: Nearmap (07/2020).
I:\DEW2002\GIS\Maps\Ecosystem Values Report\Figure 3_Study Area on Aerial Imagery.mxd (4/22/2021) FIGURE 3
Van Buskirk Golf Course Re-Use Study
Stockton, San Joaquin County, California
Study Area on Aerial Imagery
0 500 1000
FEET
ATTACHMENT B 2008
This page intentionally left blank.
ATTACHMENT B 2009
2.0 PART 1: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT
2.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Biological Resources Report (Report) is to evaluate the potential effects of the project on federally and State listed and proposed species and designated and proposed critical habitat, and to determine whether these species or habitats are likely to be adversely affected by the project pursuant to 50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §402.12 and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The essential elements of this Report are:
• Project Description: The report describes the nature of the project, its location, and the timing of the proposed effort as much as it presently known or can be anticipated. It also describes the conservation measures that will be implemented to avoid, reduce, or eliminate adverse effects or that will benefit the protected species or critical habitat. • Project Area: The project area is the area where the project will be implemented. This includes the “action area” (i.e., where the actual project activities such as grading, excavating, and planting will occur). This analysis is general in nature, because the exact locations of activities and their spatial context to the physical, biotic, and other conditions are presently unknown. • Listed Species: The potentially affected species are discussed in this Part and are listed in Appendix D. This includes all federally and state listed species, including candidate species, that “may be present” in the action area or may be affected by the project. It also includes other special status plant and animal species. Using a variety of sources and the official species list from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), this list provides the documentation for the Project’s administrative record.
• Effects Determination: Finally, this report evaluates the possible effects the project may have on a listed species that potentially could be present and the supporting rationale. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15382, a significant effect on the environment means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project. This will also include the consideration of effects that may occur later in time as well as cumulative effects.
ATTACHMENT B 2010
2.2 PROPOSED ACTION
The City of Stockton intends to develop a Conceptual Master Plan (Plan) for the former Van Buskirk Golf Course. The City aims to develop a financially sustainable use of the Park that focuses on activities and facilities which improve the quality of life for Stockton’ residents and support City Council goals and strategies while staying in alignment with the City’s Long Term Financial Plan. The City’s core vision for the Park is to enhance the public space to provide opportunities that engage residents and visitors and will provide quantifiable economic and social justice3 benefits to the City and neighborhood.
2.2.1 Project Location, Zoning
The Park property is located within the urban boundary of the City of Stockton, south of the center of Stockton, adjacent to the confluence of the San Joaquin River, French Camp Slough, and Walker Slough (Figures 1-3). The site is shown on the USGS Stockton West, California, 7.5-minute quadrangle map as located within the Moss Tract in Township 1 North, Range 6 East, Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian. Approximate latitude is 37° 55' 04" North, and approximate longitude is 121° 18' 20" West.
The 192-acre parcel includes approximately 12,100 feet of levee along Walker Slough, French Camp Slough and the San Joaquin River. The area within the levee measures approximately 167 acres. This area houses the existing Van Buskirk Community Center, park, and ballfields (approximately 27 acres) and approximately 5 acres of parking area, buildings and walkways associated with the former golf course. The balance of the remaining acreage is approximately 11.25 acres of existing wetlands, and approximately 125 acres of natural areas. The acreages of the levee (including the area from the water’s edge to the levee’s inward foot slope) and the existing Van Buskirk Community Center, park, and ballfields are not subject to this evaluation.
The Park is located along the eastern border of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta as delineated under the Delta Protection Act (Section 12220 of the Water Code) passed in 1959. The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 (Delta Reform Act) provides for coordination and oversight of State and local agencies proposing to fund, carry out, and approve Delta-related activities. The legally enforceable Delta Plan aims to achieve the State’s coequal goals of a reliable statewide water supply and a protected, restored Delta ecosystem.
The Park is currently zoned as “Parks and Recreation” in the Stockton General Plan (City of Stockton 2018). The predominant land use on surrounding parcels is urban residential development to the north and east and water/riparian habitat to the south and west, along French Camp Slough and the San Joaquin River. The Park and adjacent areas are not zoned for agricultural use, consequently they are not subject to Williamson Act contracts. Lands across French Camp Slough from the eastern portion of the Park are residential subdivisions.
3 Social justice benefits of urban forests and parks include filtering air pollution, absorbing flood and rainwater and providing shade/cooling. Urban trees also may reduce stress and blood pressure, and increase mental engagement, attentiveness and happiness. Communities with large street trees often have lower crime and slower traffic.
ATTACHMENT B 2011
2.3 METHODS
2.3.1 Database Review
LSA evaluated multiple existing databases regarding the potential special-status species that may be present at the site. In particular, LSA accessed the following databases:
• California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Inventory. LSA accessed the CNPS Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California for all rare plant records on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Stockton West Quadrangle. • California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). LSA queried the CNDDB for occurrences of all special-status wildlife and plant species subject to CEQA within a 5-mile radius of the property boundary. A m10mile buffer area was determined to be sufficient due to the predominantly urban nature of the surrounding areas. In addition, the assessment includes any potentially occurring sensitive natural communities. A sensitive natural community is a biological community that is regionally rare, provides important habitat opportunities for wildlife, is structurally complex, or is in other ways of special concern to local, State, or federal agencies.
CEQA identifies the elimination or substantial degradation of such communities as a significant impact. The CDFW tracks sensitive natural communities in the CNDDB. • USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Online System. LSA used the USFWS IPaC online system to determine if the property is in any designated critical habitat. The IPaC online system was also used to generate a list of special-status plant and wildlife species that the USFWS suggests may occur within or near the property or be affected by a project on the property. The search area was defined by drawing the property boundaries onto the IPaC online mapper.
• The California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project which identified the network of connected wildlands. The Essential Connectivity Map depicts large, relatively natural habitat blocks that support native biodiversity (Natural Landscape Blocks) and areas essential for ecological connectivity between them (Essential Connectivity Areas). • The Vegetation and Land Use Classification and Map Update of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, produced by CDFW (2019). This report describes the vegetation classification and mapping of the Legal Delta portion of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta based on 2016 imagery, for use in conjunction with the Delta Regional Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Plan. Vegetation and land use are mapped for the 737,621 acres constituting the Legal Delta portion of the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Delta area. Vegetation mapping is to alliance level when possible, otherwise it is left at group level. The map classification is based on a vegetation classification derived from field data collected in summer and fall of 2005 produced by the Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP) of CDFW. • Other Sources: LSA reviewed the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) for information on protected biological resources that could potentially occur on the property. The SJMSCP (2000) was adopted by the San Joaquin Transportation Authority on November 14, 2000. The key purpose of the SJMSCP is to provide a strategy for balancing the need to conserve open space and the need to convert open space to ATTACHMENT B 2012
non-open space uses while protecting the region’s agricultural economy; preserving landowner property rights; providing for the long-term management of plant, fish, and wildlife species, especially those that are currently listed, or may be listed in the future, under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) or the California (CESA); providing and maintaining multiple openspaces which contribute to the quality of life of the residents of San Joaquin County; and accommodating a growing population while minimizing costs to Project Proponents and society at large.
2.3.2 Wildlife Surveys
A breeding bird and wildlife habitat survey was conducted to characterize the habitat types and wildlife species on the Park, including wetlands or special-status species habitats that may be present on the site. On April 20, by foot and with the aid of binoculars, LSA staff biologists Gretchen Zantzinger and Michelle Nicoles conducted a preliminary survey for nesting birds and special-status wildlife species. LSA surveyed both the east and west strata of the Park to search for biological resources, such as the presence of special-status animals and their habitats, and sensitive habitats such as wetlands or drainages. The survey included searching trees for occupied nests of passerine and raptor species, such as Swainson’s hawk, and the ground for California ground squirrel burrows that could provide refuge for burrowing owls. The potential presence of rare, threatened, or endangered species was determined based on an evaluation of the habitat types present on the property, the CNDDB records, and other occurrence information from the vicinity of the property.
Plant and animal species observed during the survey were recorded in field notes. Weather conditions during the survey consisted of temperatures ranging from the 50s to the high 70s degrees F. Binoculars (10 x 40) were used to aid in identification of bird species, behavioral observations, and investigation of suitable habitats. Following the guidance provided in the CDFW 2012 Burrowing Owl Staff Report (CDFW 2012), the survey assessed the project area for burrowing owl habitat (e.g., burrows, structures), with particular attention to habitat suitability and utilization (e.g., whitewash, prey remains, pellets). The survey also identified suitable habitat for Swainson’s hawk and evaluated the presence of active bird nests that are protected under the California Fish and Game Code. Finally, the survey provided observations on the potential for restoration and enhancement of the Park to support pollinators (butterflies, bees).
2.3.3 Vegetation Inventory
LSA conducted a complete vegetation and habitat inventory. From February 17 through 25, 2021, a team of biologists and botanists conducted a comprehensive tree inventory of the entire site. Each tree was identified by species, georeferenced by its location and given a unique waypoint in a GIS database. The tree’s diameter at breast height (dbh in inches), crown health (percent of crown damaged or dead) and total height (in meters) was recorded. A tree’s condition was evaluated by the amount of crown damage (dieback) and condition classes were as follows:
• Excellent = 0 percent dieback
• Good = 1 - 10 percent dieback
• Fair = 10 - 25 percent dieback
• Poor = 25 - 50 percent dieback
ATTACHMENT B 2013
• Critical = 50 - 75 percent dieback
• Dying = 75 - 99 percent dieback
• Dead = 100 percent dieback
The height of each tree was determined either by a laser-range finder with a tree height measuring function (LaserTech TruPulse 360R Laser Rangefinder) or by combining linear distance measurement with a common laser range finder and a clinometer. For the latter method, correction for the eye level height of the observer was necessary to obtain correct tree height measurements. All data were recorded in field data sheets and later transcribed in Microsoft Excel spreadsheets.
2.4 Regulatory Background
The following sections explain the regulatory context of the biological resources report, including applicable laws and regulations that were applied to the field investigations and analysis of potential project impacts.
2.4.1 Sensitive Land Cover Types
Land cover types are defined as areas covered by a particular vegetation type, soil or bedrock formation, aquatic features, and/or development (urban, roads etc.). Typically, land cover types have identifiable boundaries that can be delineated based on changes in plant assemblages, soil or rock types, soil surface or near-surface hydroperiod, anthropogenic or natural disturbance, topography, elevation, etc. Land cover types that are considered or protected under one or more environmental regulations are discussed below.
Waters of the United States: The United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulates "Waters of the United States" under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Waters of the United States are defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as waters susceptible to use in commerce, including interstate waters and wetlands, all other waters (intrastate waterbodies, including wetlands), and their tributaries (33 CFR 328.3). Potential wetland areas, according to the three criteria used to delineate wetlands as defined in the Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987), are identified by the presence of (1) hydrophytic vegetation, (2) hydric soils, and (3) wetland hydrology. Areas that are inundated at a sufficient depth and for a sufficient duration to exclude growth of hydrophytic vegetation are subject to Section 404 jurisdiction as "other waters" and are often characterized by an ordinary high-water mark (OHWM).
Other waters, for example, generally include lakes, rivers, and streams. The placement of fill material into Waters of the United States generally requires an individual or nationwide permit from the Corps under Section 404 of the CWA.
Waters of the State: The term "Waters of the State" is defined by the Porter-Cologne Act as "any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state." The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) protects all waters in its regulatory scope and has special responsibility for wetlands, riparian areas, and headwaters. These waterbodies have high resource value, are vulnerable to filling, and are not systematically protected by other programs.
RWQCB jurisdiction includes "isolated" wetlands and waters that may not be regulated by the Corps ATTACHMENT B 2014
under Section 404. Waters of the State are regulated by the RWQCB under the State Water Quality Certification Program which regulates discharges of fill and dredged material under Section 401 of the CWA and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Projects that require a Corps permit, or fall under other federal jurisdiction, and have the potential to impact Waters of the State, are required to comply with the terms of the Water Quality Certification determination. If a project does not require a federal permit but does involve dredge or fill activities that may result in a discharge to Waters of the State, the RWQCB has the option to regulate the dredge and fill activities under its state authority in the form of Waste Discharge Requirements.
Streams, Lakes, and Riparian Habitat: Streams and lakes, as habitat for fish and wildlife species, are subject to jurisdiction by CDFW under Sections 1600-1616 of California Fish and Game Code (CFGC).
Alterations to or work within or adjacent to streambeds or lakes generally require a 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement. The term "stream", which includes creeks and rivers, is defined in the California Code of Regulations (CCR) as "a body of water that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and supports fish or other aquatic life [including] watercourses having a surface or subsurface flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation" (14 CCR 1.72). In addition, the term "stream" can include ephemeral streams, dry washes, watercourses with subsurface flows, canals, aqueducts, irrigation ditches, and other means of water conveyance if they support aquatic life, riparian vegetation, or stream-dependent terrestrial wildlife (CDFG 1994). "Riparian" is defined as "on, or pertaining to, the banks of a stream." Riparian vegetation is defined as "vegetation which occurs in and/or adjacent to a stream and is dependent on, and occurs because of, the stream itself' (CDFG 1994). Removal of riparian vegetation also requires a Section 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW.
Sensitive Natural Communities: Sensitive natural communities not discussed above include habitats that fulfill special functions or have special values. Natural communities considered sensitive are those identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW. CDFW ranks sensitive communities as "threatened" or "very threatened" (CDFG 2010, CDFW 2018a) and keeps records of their occurrences in its California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFW 2019a).
CNDDB vegetation alliances are ranked 1 through 5 based on NatureServe's (2019) methodology, with those alliances ranked globally (G) or statewide (S) as 1 through 3 considered sensitive. Impacts to sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or those identified by the CDFW or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) must be considered and evaluated under CEQA (CCR Title 14, Div. 6, Chap. 3, Appendix G).
2.4.2 Special-status Species
Special-status species are those plants and animals that, because of their recognized rarity or vulnerability to various causes of habitat loss or population decline, are recognized by federal, State, or other agencies. Some of these species receive specific protection that is defined by federal or State endangered species legislation. Others have been designated as "sensitive" on the basis of adopted policies and expertise of State resource agencies or organizations with acknowledged expertise, or policies adopted by local governmental agencies such as counties, cities, and special districts to meet local conservation objectives. For the purposes of this assessment, the term “special status” includes those species that are:
ATTACHMENT B 2015
• Federally listed or proposed for listing under the Federal Endangered Species Act (50 CFR
17.11- 17.12);
• Candidates for listing under the Federal Endangered Species Act (61 FR 7596-7613); • State listed or candidate for listing under the California Endangered Species Act (14 CCR 670.5);
• Species by the CDFW as a Species of Special Concern;
• Fully protected animals, as defined by the State of California (California Fish and Game Code Section 3511, 4700, and 5050);
• Species that meet the definition of threatened, endangered, or rare under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; CEQA Guidelines Section 15380); The federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act provides relatively broad protections to both of North America's eagle species (bald [Haliaeetus leucocephalus] and golden eagle [Aquila chrysaetos)] that in some regards are similar to those provided by ESA. Species of Special Concern (species that face extirpation in California if current population and habitat trends continue) are given special consideration under CEQA and are therefore considered special-status species.
In addition to regulations for special-status species, most native birds in the United States, including non-status species, have baseline legal protections under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and CFGC, i.e., sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513. Under these laws/codes, the intentional harm or collection of adult birds as well as the intentional collection or destruction of active nests, eggs, and young is illegal. For bat species, the Western Bat Working Group (WBWG) designates conservation status for species of bats, and those with a high or medium-high priority are typically given special consideration under CEQA.
Plants listed as rare or endangered under the California Native Plant Protection Act (California Fish and Game Code Section 1900 et seq.), or plants listed by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) as rare, threatened, or endangered (List 1A and List 2 status plants). Special-status plants include taxa that have been listed as endangered or threatened, or are formal candidates for such listing, under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and/or California Endangered Species Act (CESA).
The California Native Plant Protection Act (CNPPA) lists 64 "rare" or "endangered" and prevents "take", with few exceptions, of these species. Plant species on the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare and Endangered Plant Inventory (Inventory) with California Rare Plant Ranks (CRPR) of 1, 2, and 3 are also considered special status plant species and must be considered under CEQA.
Rank 4 species are typically only afforded protection under CEQA when such species are particularly unique to the locale (e.g., range limit, low abundance/low frequency, limited habitat) or are otherwise considered locally rare.
Critical Habitat, Essential Fish Habitat, and Wildlife Corridors: Critical habitat is a term defined in the ESA as a specific and formally designated geographic area that contains features essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and that may require special management ATTACHMENT B 2016
and protection. The ESA requires federal agencies to consult with the USFWS to conserve listed species on their lands and to ensure that any activities or projects they fund, authorize, or carry out will not jeopardize the survival of a threatened or endangered species. In consultation for those species with critical habitat, federal agencies must also ensure that their activities or projects do not adversely modify critical habitat to the point that it will no longer aid in the species' recovery. Note that designated critical habitat areas that are currently unoccupied by the species, but which are deemed necessary for the species' recovery are also protected by the prohibition against adverse modification.
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), as amended (16 United States Code [USC] 1801), mandates that Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) be identified and described in federal Fishery Management Plans (FMPs). Federal action agencies must consult with the NMFS on any activity that they fund, permit, or carry out that may adversely affect EFH. The EFH regulations require that federal action agencies obligated to consult on EFH also provide NMFS with a written assessment of the effects of their action on EFH (50 CFR Section 600.920). NMFS is required to provide EFH conservation and enhancement recommendations to the federal action agency. The statute also requires federal action agencies receiving NMFS EFH Conservation Recommendations to provide a detailed written response to NMFS within 30 days upon receipt, detailing how they intend to avoid, mitigate, or offset the impact of the activity on EFH. Any federal agency that authorizes, funds, or undertakes action that may adversely affect EFH is required to consult with NMFS.
Movement and migratory corridors for native wildlife (including aquatic corridors) as well as wildlife nursery sites are given special consideration under CEQA.
2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.5.1 Climate
The climate of the Park is sub-humid with hot dry summers and cool moist winters. Dense ground fog often occurs in the winter months. Mean annual precipitation is 17 inches. The mean January low temperature is 38 degrees Fahrenheit (degrees F); the mean July high temperature is 93 degrees F. The frost-free period ranges from 260 to 280 days. According to California’s Fourth Climate Assessment 2019 (Bedsworth et al. 2018), rising global temperatures will produce more frequent and intense heat waves in the Sacramento Valley with fewer cooling degree days that are essential to certain crops, optimal human health conditions, and the longevity of transportation and electrical infrastructure – trends that are expected to continue. Warming air temperatures will increase soil moisture loss and lead to seasonal summer dryness that may become prolonged due to earlier spring drying that lasts longer into the fall and winter. Drought conditions will likely increase due to the increasing variability of precipitation and frequency of dry years.