Exhibit 1 - EIR Addendum — City Council and Concurrent Authorities, April 2, 2024 (part 2 of 3)

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1466 1.5187 1.0031 2.0400e-
003

0.4189 0.0705 0.4893 0.1701 0.0648 0.2349 0.0000 179.1785 179.1785 0.0564 1.6000e- 004
180.6365
2023 0.4437 3.8720 3.9329 0.0113 0.6572 0.1430 0.8001 0.2092 0.1326 0.3419 0.0000 1,021.913 4 1,021.913
4 0.1580 0.0490 1,040.474
9 2024 0.4207 3.1560 4.0409 0.0141 0.7212 0.0913 0.8125 0.1973 0.0859 0.2832 0.0000 1,295.091 9 1,295.091
9 0.0871 0.0945 1,325.414
4 2025 0.3906 2.9985 3.8976 0.0138 0.7185 0.0796 0.7981 0.1966 0.0750 0.2715 0.0000 1,265.518 4 1,265.518
4 0.0850 0.0917 1,294.960
0 2026 0.3780 2.9802 3.8131 0.0135 0.7185 0.0795 0.7979 0.1966 0.0748 0.2714 0.0000 1,241.987 3 1,241.987
3 0.0839 0.0894 1,270.719
3 2027 0.3666 2.9621 3.7305 0.0133 0.7185 0.0793 0.7977 0.1966 0.0746 0.2712 0.0000 1,219.140 0 1,219.140
0 0.0829 0.0871 1,247.171
8 2028 0.3551 2.9368 3.6486 0.0130 0.7157 0.0788 0.7945 0.1958 0.0742 0.2700 0.0000 1,193.552 3 1,193.552
3 0.0817 0.0847 1,220.837
4 2029 3.8662 1.7673 2.4438 7.0400e-
003

0.3329 0.0582 0.3911 0.0910 0.0544 0.1453 0.0000 640.7267 640.7267 0.0714 0.0364 653.3426 2030 6.9403 0.0347 0.1264 3.3000e-
004

0.0299 8.4000e-
004

0.0307 8.0000e-
003

8.3000e-
004

8.8200e-
003

0.0000 29.8860 29.8860 7.8000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

30.0521
Maximum 6.9403 3.8720 4.0409 0.0141 0.7212 0.1430 0.8125 0.2092 0.1326 0.3419 0.0000 1,295.091 9 1,295.091
9 0.1580 0.0945 1,325.414
4 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.27 0.00 17.37 22.43 0.00 16.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1971 1.1971
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 4 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
2 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.2709 1.2709
3 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.2465 1.2465
4 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 1.0262 1.0262
5 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.9354 0.9354
6 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 0.9149 0.9149
7 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 0.8947 0.8947
8 6-1-2024 8-31-2024 0.8868 0.8868
9 9-1-2024 11-30-2024 0.8927 0.8927
10 12-1-2024 2-28-2025 0.8620 0.8620
11 3-1-2025 5-31-2025 0.8506 0.8506
12 6-1-2025 8-31-2025 0.8429 0.8429
13 9-1-2025 11-30-2025 0.8490 0.8490
14 12-1-2025 2-28-2026 0.8418 0.8418
15 3-1-2026 5-31-2026 0.8427 0.8427
16 6-1-2026 8-31-2026 0.8350 0.8350
17 9-1-2026 11-30-2026 0.8410 0.8410
18 12-1-2026 2-28-2027 0.8340 0.8340
19 3-1-2027 5-31-2027 0.8351 0.8351
20 6-1-2027 8-31-2027 0.8276 0.8276
21 9-1-2027 11-30-2027 0.8334 0.8334
22 12-1-2027 2-29-2028 0.8365 0.8365
23 3-1-2028 5-31-2028 0.8288 0.8288
24 6-1-2028 8-31-2028 0.8214 0.8214
25 9-1-2028 11-30-2028 0.8271 0.8271
26 12-1-2028 2-28-2029 0.8213 0.8213
27 3-1-2029 5-31-2029 0.8229 0.8229
28 6-1-2029 8-31-2029 0.3463 0.3463
29 9-1-2029 11-30-2029 1.8264 1.8264
30 12-1-2029 2-28-2030 6.2324 6.2324
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 5 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
31 3-1-2030 5-31-2030 2.8374 2.8374
Highest 6.2324 6.2324

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 6.7079 0.1241 2.0531 7.5000e-
004

0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 120.2615 120.2615 5.4200e- 003

2.1400e-
003
121.0359
Energy 0.0893 0.8023 0.6139 4.8700e-
003

0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 2,203.887
9 2,203.887
9 0.2306 0.0421 2,222.194
3 Mobile 12.9161 17.2534 111.6682 0.2494 29.7711 0.1888 29.9599 7.9557 0.1768 8.1325 0.0000 23,059.31 87 23,059.31
87 1.3736 1.2810 23,475.39
51 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 272.0180 0.0000 272.0180 16.0758 0.0000 673.9132 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 32.7926 72.3641 105.1567 3.3798 0.0810 213.7745 Total 19.7133 18.1799 114.3351 0.2550 29.7711 0.2698 30.0409 7.9557 0.2578 8.2135 304.8106 25,455.83 21 25,760.64
28 21.0652 1.4062 26,706.31
29 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 6 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 120.2615 120.2615 5.4200e- 003

2.1400e-
003
121.0359
Energy 0.0893 0.8023 0.6139 4.8700e-
003

0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 2,203.887
9 2,203.887
9 0.2306 0.0421 2,222.194
3 Mobile 12.9161 17.2534 111.6682 0.2494 29.7711 0.1888 29.9599 7.9557 0.1768 8.1325 0.0000 23,059.31 87 23,059.31
87 1.3736 1.2810 23,475.39
51 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 272.0180 0.0000 272.0180 16.0758 0.0000 673.9132 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 32.7926 72.3641 105.1567 3.3798 0.0810 213.7745 Total 19.7133 18.1799 114.3351 0.2550 29.7711 0.2698 30.0409 7.9557 0.2578 8.2135 304.8106 25,455.83 21 25,760.64
28 21.0652 1.4062 26,706.31
29 Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 7 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.0 Construction Detail

2.3 Vegetation
CO2e
Category MT
Vegetation Land
Change
-619.2560
Total -619.2560
Vegetation
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/1/2022 11/23/2022 5 60 2 Grading Grading 11/24/2022 6/28/2023 5 155
3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/29/2023 6/6/2029 5 1550 4 Paving Paving 6/7/2029 11/7/2029 5 110
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/8/2029 4/10/2030 5 110 Residential Indoor: 546,750; Residential Outdoor: 182,250; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,736,925; Non-Residential Outdoor: 578,975; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 8 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 565.00 219.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 113.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 9 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.5897 0.0000 0.5897 0.3031 0.0000 0.3031 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.0484 0.0484 0.0445 0.0445 0.0000 100.3182 100.3182 0.0324 0.0000 101.1293 Total 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.5897 0.0484 0.6381 0.3031 0.0445 0.3476 0.0000 100.3182 100.3182 0.0324 0.0000 101.1293 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 10 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3200e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Total 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3200e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.2654 0.0000 0.2654 0.1364 0.0000 0.1364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.0484 0.0484 0.0445 0.0445 0.0000 100.3181 100.3181 0.0324 0.0000 101.1292 Total 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.2654 0.0484 0.3138 0.1364 0.0445 0.1809 0.0000 100.3181 100.3181 0.0324 0.0000 101.1292 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 11 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

3.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9900e-
003

1.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Total 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

3.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9900e-
003

1.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.3279 0.0000 0.3279 0.0713 0.0000 0.0713 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.0221 0.0221 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 73.6217 73.6217 0.0238 0.0000 74.2170 Total 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.3279 0.0221 0.3499 0.0713 0.0203 0.0916 0.0000 73.6217 73.6217 0.0238 0.0000 74.2170 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 12 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.5000e-
004

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.1600e-
003

5.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.8000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Total 8.5000e-
004

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.1600e-
003

5.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.8000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1475 0.0000 0.1475 0.0321 0.0000 0.0321 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.0221 0.0221 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 73.6216 73.6216 0.0238 0.0000 74.2169 Total 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.1475 0.0221 0.1696 0.0321 0.0203 0.0524 0.0000 73.6216 73.6216 0.0238 0.0000 74.2169 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 13 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Total 8.5000e-
004

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.6320 0.0000 0.6320 0.2385 0.0000 0.2385 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.0912 0.0912 0.0839 0.0839 0.0000 349.0253 349.0253 0.1129 0.0000 351.8474 Total 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.6320 0.0912 0.7232 0.2385 0.0839 0.3224 0.0000 349.0253 349.0253 0.1129 0.0000 351.8474 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 14 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7200e-
003

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

0.0102 5.0000e-
005

0.0103 2.7100e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.7600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Total 3.7200e-
003

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

0.0102 5.0000e-
005

0.0103 2.7100e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.7600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.2844 0.0000 0.2844 0.1073 0.0000 0.1073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.0912 0.0912 0.0839 0.0839 0.0000 349.0249 349.0249 0.1129 0.0000 351.8470 Total 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.2844 0.0912 0.3756 0.1073 0.0839 0.1912 0.0000 349.0249 349.0249 0.1129 0.0000 351.8470 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 15 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
003

5.0000e-
005

9.4500e-
003

2.5200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.5600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Total 3.7200e-
003

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
003

5.0000e-
005

9.4500e-
003

2.5200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.5600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9911 152.9911 0.0364 0.0000 153.9010 Total 0.1038 0.9494 1.0721 1.7800e-
003

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9911 152.9911 0.0364 0.0000 153.9010 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 16 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0153 0.6395 0.1882 2.9000e-
003

0.0955 4.0900e-
003

0.0996 0.0276 3.9100e-
003

0.0315 0.0000 278.4846 278.4846 1.3700e-
003

0.0421 291.0652
Worker 0.1083 0.0717 0.8482 2.5500e-
003

0.2970 1.4700e-
003

0.2985 0.0790 1.3500e-
003

0.0803 0.0000 233.4013 233.4013 7.1100e-
003

6.7000e-
003
235.5757
Total 0.1236 0.7111 1.0364 5.4500e-
003

0.3926 5.5600e-
003

0.3981 0.1066 5.2600e-
003

0.1118 0.0000 511.8859 511.8859 8.4800e-
003

0.0488 526.6408
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1038 0.9494 1.0721 1.7800e-
003

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9910 152.9910 0.0364 0.0000 153.9008 Total 0.1038 0.9494 1.0721 1.7800e-
003

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9910 152.9910 0.0364 0.0000 153.9008 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 17 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0895 4.0900e-
003

0.0936 0.0261 3.9100e-
003

0.0300 0.0000 278.4846 278.4846 1.3700e-
003

0.0421 291.0652
Worker 0.1083 0.0717 0.8482 2.5500e-
003

0.2739 1.4700e-
003

0.2754 0.0733 1.3500e-
003

0.0746 0.0000 233.4013 233.4013 7.1100e-
003

6.7000e-
003
235.5757
Total 0.1236 0.7111 1.0364 5.4500e-
003

0.3634 5.5600e-
003

0.3689 0.0994 5.2600e-
003

0.1047 0.0000 511.8859 511.8859 8.4800e-
003

0.0488 526.6408
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 18 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0296 1.2700 0.3663 5.6700e-
003

0.1896 8.1800e-
003

0.1978 0.0548 7.8300e-
003

0.0626 0.0000 544.1628 544.1628 2.6000e-
003

0.0822 568.7154
Worker 0.1983 0.1249 1.5568 4.8800e-
003

0.5896 2.7400e-
003

0.5923 0.1567 2.5200e-
003

0.1593 0.0000 447.2072 447.2072 0.0127 0.0123 451.1814
Total 0.2279 1.3949 1.9230 0.0106 0.7792 0.0109 0.7901 0.2115 0.0104 0.2219 0.0000 991.3700 991.3700 0.0153 0.0944 1,019.896 9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 19 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1776 8.1800e-
003

0.1858 0.0518 7.8300e-
003

0.0597 0.0000 544.1628 544.1628 2.6000e-
003

0.0822 568.7154
Worker 0.1983 0.1249 1.5568 4.8800e-
003

0.5437 2.7400e-
003

0.5464 0.1455 2.5200e-
003

0.1480 0.0000 447.2072 447.2072 0.0127 0.0123 451.1814
Total 0.2279 1.3949 1.9230 0.0106 0.7212 0.0109 0.7322 0.1973 0.0104 0.2077 0.0000 991.3700 991.3700 0.0153 0.0944 1,019.896 9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 20 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0288 1.2608 0.3586 5.5500e-
003

0.1889 8.1500e-
003

0.1970 0.0546 7.8000e-
003

0.0624 0.0000 532.4462 532.4462 2.4900e-
003

0.0803 556.4361
Worker 0.1833 0.1104 1.4399 4.6900e-
003

0.5873 2.6000e-
003

0.5899 0.1562 2.3900e-
003

0.1585 0.0000 430.4177 430.4177 0.0114 0.0114 434.0908
Total 0.2121 1.3712 1.7985 0.0102 0.7762 0.0108 0.7869 0.2107 0.0102 0.2209 0.0000 962.8639 962.8639 0.0139 0.0917 990.5269 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 21 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1769 8.1500e-
003

0.1850 0.0516 7.8000e-
003

0.0595 0.0000 532.4462 532.4462 2.4900e-
003

0.0803 556.4361
Worker 0.1833 0.1104 1.4399 4.6900e-
003

0.5416 2.6000e-
003

0.5442 0.1449 2.3900e-
003

0.1473 0.0000 430.4177 430.4177 0.0114 0.0114 434.0908
Total 0.2121 1.3712 1.7985 0.0102 0.7185 0.0108 0.7292 0.1966 0.0102 0.2068 0.0000 962.8639 962.8639 0.0139 0.0917 990.5269 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 22 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0283 1.2537 0.3535 5.4500e-
003

0.1889 8.1200e-
003

0.1970 0.0546 7.7600e-
003

0.0624 0.0000 522.6202 522.6202 2.4000e-
003

0.0787 546.1335
Worker 0.1712 0.0992 1.3605 4.5400e-
003

0.5873 2.4800e-
003

0.5898 0.1562 2.2800e-
003

0.1584 0.0000 416.7125 416.7125 0.0103 0.0107 420.1526
Total 0.1995 1.3529 1.7140 9.9900e-
003

0.7762 0.0106 0.7868 0.2107 0.0100 0.2208 0.0000 939.3327 939.3327 0.0127 0.0894 966.2861 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 23 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1769 8.1200e-
003

0.1850 0.0517 7.7600e-
003

0.0594 0.0000 522.6202 522.6202 2.4000e-
003

0.0787 546.1335
Worker 0.1712 0.0992 1.3605 4.5400e-
003

0.5416 2.4800e-
003

0.5441 0.1449 2.2800e-
003

0.1472 0.0000 416.7125 416.7125 0.0103 0.0107 420.1526
Total 0.1995 1.3529 1.7140 9.9900e-
003

0.7185 0.0106 0.7291 0.1966 0.0100 0.2066 0.0000 939.3327 939.3327 0.0127 0.0894 966.2861 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 24 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0278 1.2449 0.3491 5.3400e-
003

0.1889 8.0600e-
003

0.1969 0.0546 7.7100e-
003

0.0623 0.0000 512.0315 512.0315 2.3200e-
003

0.0770 535.0395
Worker 0.1604 0.0899 1.2824 4.4100e-
003

0.5873 2.3400e-
003

0.5897 0.1562 2.1500e-
003

0.1583 0.0000 404.4540 404.4540 9.4000e-
003

0.0101 407.6992
Total 0.1882 1.3348 1.6315 9.7500e-
003

0.7762 0.0104 0.7866 0.2107 9.8600e-
003

0.2206 0.0000 916.4854 916.4854 0.0117 0.0871 942.7387
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 25 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1769 8.0600e-
003

0.1850 0.0517 7.7100e-
003

0.0594 0.0000 512.0315 512.0315 2.3200e-
003

0.0770 535.0395
Worker 0.1604 0.0899 1.2824 4.4100e-
003

0.5416 2.3400e-
003

0.5439 0.1449 2.1500e-
003

0.1471 0.0000 404.4540 404.4540 9.4000e-
003

0.0101 407.6992
Total 0.1882 1.3348 1.6315 9.7500e-
003

0.7185 0.0104 0.7289 0.1966 9.8600e-
003

0.2064 0.0000 916.4854 916.4854 0.0117 0.0871 942.7387
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e-
003

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 26 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0273 1.2337 0.3443 5.2100e-
003

0.1882 7.9800e-
003

0.1961 0.0544 7.6300e-
003

0.0620 0.0000 500.0585 500.0585 2.2400e-
003

0.0751 522.4990
Worker 0.1500 0.0820 1.2133 4.2700e-
003

0.5851 2.1800e-
003

0.5872 0.1556 2.0100e-
003

0.1576 0.0000 391.9988 391.9988 8.5800e-
003

9.5900e-
003
395.0717
Total 0.1773 1.3157 1.5576 9.4800e-
003

0.7732 0.0102 0.7834 0.2099 9.6400e-
003

0.2196 0.0000 892.0574 892.0574 0.0108 0.0847 917.5707
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e-
003

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e-
003

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 27 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1762 7.9800e-
003

0.1842 0.0515 7.6300e-
003

0.0591 0.0000 500.0585 500.0585 2.2400e-
003

0.0751 522.4990
Worker 0.1500 0.0820 1.2133 4.2700e-
003

0.5395 2.1800e-
003

0.5417 0.1444 2.0100e-
003

0.1464 0.0000 391.9988 391.9988 8.5800e-
003

9.5900e-
003
395.0717
Total 0.1773 1.3157 1.5576 9.4800e-
003

0.7157 0.0102 0.7259 0.1958 9.6400e-
003

0.2055 0.0000 892.0574 892.0574 0.0108 0.0847 917.5707
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0345 131.0345 0.0308 0.0000 131.8046 Total 0.0773 0.7045 0.9088 1.5200e-
003

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0345 131.0345 0.0308 0.0000 131.8046 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 28 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0117 0.5330 0.1484 2.2200e-
003

0.0818 3.4400e-
003

0.0852 0.0236 3.2900e-
003

0.0269 0.0000 213.1222 213.1222 9.5000e-
004

0.0320 222.6742
Worker 0.0613 0.0329 0.5036 1.8100e-
003

0.2543 8.9000e-
004

0.2552 0.0676 8.2000e-
004

0.0684 0.0000 166.1451 166.1451 3.4400e-
003

4.0000e-
003
167.4230
Total 0.0730 0.5660 0.6520 4.0300e-
003

0.3360 4.3300e-
003

0.3404 0.0912 4.1100e-
003

0.0954 0.0000 379.2673 379.2673 4.3900e-
003

0.0360 390.0973
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0773 0.7045 0.9088 1.5200e-
003

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0343 131.0343 0.0308 0.0000 131.8044 Total 0.0773 0.7045 0.9088 1.5200e-
003

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0343 131.0343 0.0308 0.0000 131.8044 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 29 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0766 3.4400e-
003

0.0800 0.0224 3.2900e-
003

0.0257 0.0000 213.1222 213.1222 9.5000e-
004

0.0320 222.6742
Worker 0.0613 0.0329 0.5036 1.8100e-
003

0.2345 8.9000e-
004

0.2354 0.0627 8.2000e-
004

0.0636 0.0000 166.1451 166.1451 3.4400e-
003

4.0000e-
003
167.4230
Total 0.0730 0.5660 0.6520 4.0300e-
003

0.3111 4.3300e-
003

0.3154 0.0851 4.1100e-
003

0.0892 0.0000 379.2673 379.2673 4.3900e-
003

0.0360 390.0973
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1059 110.1059 0.0356 0.0000 110.9962 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1059 110.1059 0.0356 0.0000 110.9962 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 30 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.5700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Total 1.5800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.5700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1058 110.1058 0.0356 0.0000 110.9960 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1058 110.1058 0.0356 0.0000 110.9960 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 31 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.0800e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.6400e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Total 1.5800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.0800e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.6400e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Total 3.6598 0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 32 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.1200e-
003

2.2100e-
003

0.0339 1.2000e-
004

0.0171 6.0000e-
005

0.0172 4.5500e-
003

6.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
003

0.0000 11.1744 11.1744 2.3000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

11.2603
Total 4.1200e-
003

2.2100e-
003

0.0339 1.2000e-
004

0.0171 6.0000e-
005

0.0172 4.5500e-
003

6.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
003

0.0000 11.1744 11.1744 2.3000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

11.2603
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 3.6566 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.2500e-
003

0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Total 3.6598 0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 33 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.2100e-
003

0.0339 1.2000e-
004

0.0158 6.0000e-
005

0.0158 4.2200e-
003

6.0000e-
005

4.2700e-
003

0.0000 11.1744 11.1744 2.3000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

11.2603
Total 4.1200e-
003

2.2100e-
003

0.0339 1.2000e-
004

0.0158 6.0000e-
005

0.0158 4.2200e-
003

6.0000e-
005

4.2700e-
003

0.0000 11.1744 11.1744 2.3000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

11.2603
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Total 6.9330 0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 34 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2030
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.3500e-
003

3.9100e-
003

0.0616 2.3000e-
004

0.0324 1.1000e-
004

0.0325 8.6100e-
003

1.0000e-
004

8.7100e-
003

0.0000 20.6943 20.6943 4.1000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

20.8511
Total 7.3500e-
003

3.9100e-
003

0.0616 2.3000e-
004

0.0324 1.1000e-
004

0.0325 8.6100e-
003

1.0000e-
004

8.7100e-
003

0.0000 20.6943 20.6943 4.1000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

20.8511
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 6.9283 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7100e-
003

0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Total 6.9330 0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 35 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.9100e-
003

0.0616 2.3000e-
004

0.0299 1.1000e-
004

0.0300 8.0000e-
003

1.0000e-
004

8.0900e-
003

0.0000 20.6943 20.6943 4.1000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

20.8511
Total 7.3500e-
003

3.9100e-
003

0.0616 2.3000e-
004

0.0299 1.1000e-
004

0.0300 8.0000e-
003

1.0000e-
004

8.0900e-
003

0.0000 20.6943 20.6943 4.1000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

20.8511
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 36 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 12.9161 17.2534 111.6682 0.2494 29.7711 0.1888 29.9599 7.9557 0.1768 8.1325 0.0000 23,059.31 87 23,059.31
87 1.3736 1.2810 23,475.39
51 Unmitigated 12.9161 17.2534 111.6682 0.2494 29.7711 0.1888 29.9599 7.9557 0.1768 8.1325 0.0000 23,059.31 87 23,059.31
87 1.3736 1.2810 23,475.39
51 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 1,976.40 2,197.80 1695.60 5,702,655 5,702,655 Regional Shopping Center 43,712.61 53,404.65 24432.75 74,240,051 74,240,051 Total 45,689.01 55,602.45 26,128.35 79,942,706 79,942,706 Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 10.80 7.30 7.50 45.60 19.00 35.40 86 11 3 Regional Shopping Center 9.50 7.30 7.30 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Regional Shopping Center 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 37 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,320.381
7 1,320.381
7 0.2136 0.0259 1,333.437
9 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,320.381
7 1,320.381
7 0.2136 0.0259 1,333.437
9 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0893 0.8023 0.6139 4.8700e-
003

0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 883.5062 883.5062 0.0169 0.0162 888.7564 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0893 0.8023 0.6139 4.8700e-
003

0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 883.5062 883.5062 0.0169 0.0162 888.7564

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 38 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

3.14722e
+006

0.0170 0.1450 0.0617 9.3000e-
004

0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 167.9476 167.9476 3.2200e- 003

3.0800e-
003
168.9457
Regional
Shopping Center

1.34091e
+007

0.0723 0.6573 0.5521 3.9400e-
003

0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0000 715.5586 715.5586 0.0137 0.0131 719.8108 Total 0.0893 0.8023 0.6139 4.8700e-
003

0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 883.5062 883.5062 0.0169 0.0162 888.7564 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

3.14722e
+006

0.0170 0.1450 0.0617 9.3000e-
004

0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 167.9476 167.9476 3.2200e- 003

3.0800e-
003
168.9457
Regional
Shopping Center

1.34091e
+007

0.0723 0.6573 0.5521 3.9400e-
003

0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0000 715.5586 715.5586 0.0137 0.0131 719.8108 Total 0.0893 0.8023 0.6139 4.8700e-
003

0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 883.5062 883.5062 0.0169 0.0162 888.7564 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 39 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.10484e
+006
102.2237 0.0165 2.0000e-
003
103.2345
Regional
Shopping Center

1.31659e
+007
1,218.157
9 0.1971 0.0239 1,230.203
4 Total 1,320.381
7 0.2136 0.0259 1,333.437
9 Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.10484e
+006
102.2237 0.0165 2.0000e-
003
103.2345
Regional
Shopping Center

1.31659e
+007
1,218.157
9 0.1971 0.0239 1,230.203
4 Total 1,320.381
7 0.2136 0.0259 1,333.437
9 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 40 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 6.7079 0.1241 2.0531 7.5000e-
004

0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 120.2615 120.2615 5.4200e- 003

2.1400e-
003
121.0359
Unmitigated 6.7079 0.1241 2.0531 7.5000e-
004

0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 120.2615 120.2615 5.4200e- 003

2.1400e-
003
121.0359
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 41 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

1.0585 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

5.5769 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0118 0.1010 0.0430 6.4000e-
004

8.1700e-
003

0.0000 116.9660 116.9660 2.2400e-
003

2.1400e-
003
117.6611
Landscaping 0.0608 0.0232 2.0101 1.1000e-
004

0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0000 3.2955 3.2955 3.1700e- 003

0.0000 3.3748
Total 6.7079 0.1242 2.0531 7.5000e-
004

0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 120.2615 120.2615 5.4100e- 003

2.1400e-
003
121.0359
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 42 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

1.0585 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

5.5769 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0118 0.1010 0.0430 6.4000e-
004

8.1700e-
003

0.0000 116.9660 116.9660 2.2400e-
003

2.1400e-
003
117.6611
Landscaping 0.0608 0.0232 2.0101 1.1000e-
004

0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0112 0.0000 3.2955 3.2955 3.1700e- 003

0.0000 3.3748
Total 6.7079 0.1242 2.0531 7.5000e-
004

0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 120.2615 120.2615 5.4100e- 003

2.1400e-
003
121.0359
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 43 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 105.1567 3.3798 0.0810 213.7745
Unmitigated 105.1567 3.3798 0.0810 213.7745

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

17.5916 /

11.0903

17.9796 0.5752 0.0138 36.4662
Regional
Shopping Center

85.7723 /

52.5701

87.1771 2.8046 0.0672 177.3084
Total 105.1567 3.3798 0.0810 213.7745
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 44 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

17.5916 /

11.0903

17.9796 0.5752 0.0138 36.4662
Regional
Shopping Center

85.7723 /

52.5701

87.1771 2.8046 0.0672 177.3084
Total 105.1567 3.3798 0.0810 213.7745
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 272.0180 16.0758 0.0000 673.9132
Unmitigated 272.0180 16.0758 0.0000 673.9132
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 45 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
124.2 25.2115 1.4900 0.0000 62.4604
Regional
Shopping Center
1215.85 246.8066 14.5859 0.0000 611.4528
Total 272.0180 16.0758 0.0000 673.9132
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
124.2 25.2115 1.4900 0.0000 62.4604
Regional
Shopping Center
1215.85 246.8066 14.5859 0.0000 611.4528
Total 272.0180 16.0758 0.0000 673.9132
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 46 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

11.0 Vegetation
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT
Unmitigated -619.2560 0.0000 0.0000 -619.2560
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.1 Vegetation Land Change
Initial/Fina
l
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Acres MT
Cropland 99.88 / 0 -619.2560 0.0000 0.0000 -619.2560
Total -619.2560 0.0000 0.0000 -619.2560
Vegetation Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:37 PMPage 48 of 48 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project
San Joaquin County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Actual Acreage;
Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on project size and details.

Off-road Equipment -
Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Trips consistent with Traffic Impact Assessment (Fehr & Peers). Institute of Transportation Engineers 2017.

Energy Use -
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Construction mitigation: Water Exposed Area 2x daily; Clean Paved Road (9% fugitive dust PM reduction); Unpaved road mitigation: Limit on-site construction vehicle speeds to 5 mph; Soil Stabilizer for unpaved (10% reduction)

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Regional Shopping Center 1,157.95 1000sqft 88.61 1,157,950.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 270.00 Dwelling Unit 11.27 270,000.00 856

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 51

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2030Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 1 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Fleet Mix -

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 5 tblLandUse LotAcreage 26.58 88.61
tblLandUse LotAcreage 16.88 11.27
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 11.27 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 11.27 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 2 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6959 38.8834 29.6001 0.0636 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 6,165.353 3 6,165.353
3 1.9487 4.0500e-
003
6,215.275
5 2023 3.6509 34.5505 33.4368 0.1125 9.3679 1.4253 10.7932 3.6973 1.3113 5.0086 0.0000 11,410.13 25 11,410.13
25 1.9482 0.8072 11,669.25
72 2024 3.3987 23.5917 32.1844 0.1104 6.1255 0.6966 6.8221 1.6584 0.6558 2.3143 0.0000 11,191.59 96 11,191.59
96 0.7267 0.7875 11,444.43
60 2025 3.1651 22.4887 31.0772 0.1083 6.1255 0.6099 6.7354 1.6584 0.5743 2.2327 0.0000 10,972.66 94 10,972.66
94 0.7122 0.7675 11,219.20
31 2026 3.0553 22.3590 30.3486 0.1062 6.1255 0.6087 6.7342 1.6584 0.5732 2.2316 0.0000 10,764.13 17 10,764.13
17 0.7030 0.7486 11,004.80
30 2027 2.9571 22.2299 29.6337 0.1043 6.1255 0.6072 6.7327 1.6585 0.5718 2.2302 0.0000 10,562.56 17 10,562.56
17 0.6949 0.7299 10,797.42
93 2028 2.8690 22.1302 29.0472 0.1025 6.1255 0.6057 6.7312 1.6585 0.5704 2.2288 0.0000 10,377.64 66 10,377.64
66 0.6881 0.7125 10,607.18
44 2029 192.8637 22.0334 28.5522 0.1008 6.1256 0.6042 6.7297 1.6585 0.5690 2.2274 0.0000 10,206.45 75 10,206.45
75 0.7154 0.6964 10,431.02
88 2030 192.8091 0.9550 3.6950 9.7300e-
003

0.9283 0.0233 0.9515 0.2462 0.0230 0.2692 0.0000 964.7130 964.7130 0.0229 0.0142 969.5035 Maximum 192.8637 38.8834 33.4368 0.1125 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 11,410.13 25 11,410.13
25 1.9487 0.8072 11,669.25
72 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 3 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6959 38.8834 29.6001 0.0636 8.9820 1.6357 10.5953 4.5825 1.5049 6.0667 0.0000 6,165.353 3 6,165.353
3 1.9487 4.0500e-
003
6,215.275
5 2023 3.6509 34.5505 33.4368 0.1125 5.6673 1.4253 6.4511 1.6846 1.3113 2.9959 0.0000 11,410.13 25 11,410.13
25 1.9482 0.8072 11,669.25
72 2024 3.3987 23.5917 32.1844 0.1104 5.6673 0.6966 6.3640 1.5460 0.6558 2.2018 0.0000 11,191.59 96 11,191.59
96 0.7267 0.7875 11,444.43
60 2025 3.1651 22.4887 31.0772 0.1083 5.6674 0.6099 6.2772 1.5460 0.5743 2.1202 0.0000 10,972.66 94 10,972.66
94 0.7122 0.7675 11,219.20
31 2026 3.0553 22.3590 30.3486 0.1062 5.6674 0.6087 6.2761 1.5460 0.5732 2.1192 0.0000 10,764.13 17 10,764.13
17 0.7030 0.7486 11,004.80
30 2027 2.9571 22.2299 29.6337 0.1043 5.6674 0.6072 6.2746 1.5460 0.5718 2.1178 0.0000 10,562.56 17 10,562.56
17 0.6949 0.7299 10,797.42
93 2028 2.8690 22.1302 29.0472 0.1025 5.6674 0.6057 6.2731 1.5460 0.5704 2.1164 0.0000 10,377.64 66 10,377.64
66 0.6881 0.7125 10,607.18
44 2029 192.8637 22.0334 28.5522 0.1008 5.6674 0.6042 6.2716 1.5460 0.5690 2.1150 0.0000 10,206.45 75 10,206.45
75 0.7154 0.6964 10,431.02
88 2030 192.8091 0.9550 3.6950 9.7300e-
003

0.8557 0.0233 0.8789 0.2284 0.0230 0.2514 0.0000 964.7130 964.7130 0.0229 0.0142 969.5035 Maximum 192.8637 38.8834 33.4368 0.1125 8.9820 1.6357 10.5953 4.5825 1.5049 6.0667 0.0000 11,410.13 25 11,410.13
25 1.9487 0.8072 11,669.25
72 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.94 0.00 24.42 34.38 0.00 27.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 4 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Energy 0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 Mobile 108.1495 110.9425 777.5670 1.8154 210.9697 1.2992 212.2689 56.2389 1.2168 57.4557 184,973.1 695
184,973.1
695

9.7304 9.3623 188,006.4
017
Total 145.9602 118.0593 804.3129 1.8590 210.9697 1.9602 212.9300 56.2389 1.8779 58.1168 0.0000 193,494.6 701
193,494.6
701

9.9319 9.5178 196,579.2
731
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Energy 0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 Mobile 108.1495 110.9425 777.5670 1.8154 210.9697 1.2992 212.2689 56.2389 1.2168 57.4557 184,973.1 695
184,973.1
695

9.7304 9.3623 188,006.4
017
Total 145.9602 118.0593 804.3129 1.8590 210.9697 1.9602 212.9300 56.2389 1.8779 58.1168 0.0000 193,494.6 701
193,494.6
701

9.9319 9.5178 196,579.2
731
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 5 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/1/2022 11/23/2022 5 60 2 Grading Grading 11/24/2022 6/28/2023 5 155
3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/29/2023 6/6/2029 5 1550 4 Paving Paving 6/7/2029 11/7/2029 5 110
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/8/2029 4/10/2030 5 110 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 546,750; Residential Outdoor: 182,250; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,736,925; Non-Residential Outdoor: 578,975; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 6 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 565.00 219.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 113.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 7 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1479 7.5000e-
004

0.1486 0.0392 6.9000e-
004

0.0399 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Total 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1479 7.5000e-
004

0.1486 0.0392 6.9000e-
004

0.0399 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 8 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.8457 1.6126 10.4582 4.5461 1.4836 6.0297 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1363 7.5000e-
004

0.1371 0.0364 6.9000e-
004

0.0371 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Total 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1363 7.5000e-
004

0.1371 0.0364 6.9000e-
004

0.0371 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 9 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 9.2036 1.6349 10.8385 3.6538 1.5041 5.1579 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1643 8.3000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.7000e-
004

0.0444 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Total 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1643 8.3000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.7000e-
004

0.0444 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 10 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 4.1416 1.6349 5.7765 1.6442 1.5041 3.1483 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1514 8.3000e-
004

0.1523 0.0404 7.7000e-
004

0.0412 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Total 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1514 8.3000e-
004

0.1523 0.0404 7.7000e-
004

0.0412 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 11 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1643 7.9000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.2000e-
004

0.0443 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Total 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1643 7.9000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.2000e-
004

0.0443 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 12 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 4.1416 1.4245 5.5661 1.6442 1.3105 2.9547 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1514 7.9000e-
004

0.1522 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0412 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Total 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1514 7.9000e-
004

0.1522 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0412 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 13 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2385 9.2769 2.8094 0.0439 1.4841 0.0619 1.5460 0.4273 0.0592 0.4865 4,647.453 5 4,647.453
5 0.0232 0.7023 4,857.314
4 Worker 1.8396 0.9853 14.3834 0.0416 4.6413 0.0222 4.6635 1.2311 0.0204 1.2515 4,207.469 1 4,207.469
1 0.1120 0.1049 4,241.536
7 Total 2.0781 10.2622 17.1928 0.0856 6.1255 0.0841 6.2095 1.6584 0.0796 1.7380 8,854.922 5 8,854.922
5 0.1352 0.8072 9,098.851
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 14 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2385 9.2769 2.8094 0.0439 1.3890 0.0619 1.4509 0.4040 0.0592 0.4632 4,647.453 5 4,647.453
5 0.0232 0.7023 4,857.314
4 Worker 1.8396 0.9853 14.3834 0.0416 4.2783 0.0222 4.3005 1.1420 0.0204 1.1624 4,207.469 1 4,207.469
1 0.1120 0.1049 4,241.536
7 Total 2.0781 10.2622 17.1928 0.0856 5.6673 0.0841 5.7514 1.5460 0.0796 1.6256 8,854.922 5 8,854.922
5 0.1352 0.8072 9,098.851
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 15 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2330 9.2824 2.7541 0.0433 1.4842 0.0624 1.5466 0.4273 0.0597 0.4870 4,575.231 7 4,575.231
7 0.0222 0.6906 4,781.586
6 Worker 1.6941 0.8655 13.2635 0.0402 4.6413 0.0209 4.6623 1.2311 0.0192 1.2503 4,060.669 0 4,060.669
0 0.1002 0.0969 4,092.041
8 Total 1.9271 10.1479 16.0176 0.0834 6.1255 0.0833 6.2088 1.6584 0.0789 1.7374 8,635.900 7 8,635.900
7 0.1223 0.7875 8,873.628
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 16 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2330 9.2824 2.7541 0.0433 1.3890 0.0624 1.4514 0.4040 0.0597 0.4637 4,575.231 7 4,575.231
7 0.0222 0.6906 4,781.586
6 Worker 1.6941 0.8655 13.2635 0.0402 4.2783 0.0209 4.2992 1.1420 0.0192 1.1612 4,060.669 0 4,060.669
0 0.1002 0.0969 4,092.041
8 Total 1.9271 10.1479 16.0176 0.0834 5.6673 0.0833 5.7507 1.5460 0.0789 1.6249 8,635.900 7 8,635.900
7 0.1223 0.7875 8,873.628
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 17 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2281 9.2506 2.7064 0.0425 1.4842 0.0624 1.5466 0.4273 0.0597 0.4870 4,493.854 6 4,493.854
6 0.0213 0.6774 4,696.256
1 Worker 1.5696 0.7684 12.2862 0.0388 4.6413 0.0199 4.6612 1.2311 0.0183 1.2494 3,922.340 5 3,922.340
5 0.0900 0.0901 3,951.448
9 Total 1.7977 10.0191 14.9925 0.0813 6.1255 0.0823 6.2078 1.6584 0.0780 1.7364 8,416.195 0 8,416.195
0 0.1113 0.7675 8,647.705
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 18 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2281 9.2506 2.7064 0.0425 1.3891 0.0624 1.4515 0.4040 0.0597 0.4637 4,493.854 6 4,493.854
6 0.0213 0.6774 4,696.256
1 Worker 1.5696 0.7684 12.2862 0.0388 4.2783 0.0199 4.2982 1.1420 0.0183 1.1603 3,922.340 5 3,922.340
5 0.0900 0.0901 3,951.448
9 Total 1.7977 10.0191 14.9925 0.0813 5.6674 0.0823 5.7497 1.5460 0.0780 1.6240 8,416.195 0 8,416.195
0 0.1113 0.7675 8,647.705
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 19 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2238 9.1990 2.6674 0.0417 1.4842 0.0621 1.5463 0.4273 0.0594 0.4868 4,410.910 0 4,410.910
0 0.0206 0.6640 4,609.292
9 Worker 1.4641 0.6903 11.5966 0.0376 4.6413 0.0190 4.6604 1.2311 0.0175 1.2486 3,796.747 3 3,796.747
3 0.0815 0.0847 3,824.012
0 Total 1.6879 9.8893 14.2639 0.0793 6.1255 0.0811 6.2067 1.6584 0.0769 1.7354 8,207.657 3 8,207.657
3 0.1021 0.7486 8,433.304
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 20 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2238 9.1990 2.6674 0.0417 1.3891 0.0621 1.4512 0.4040 0.0594 0.4634 4,410.910 0 4,410.910
0 0.0206 0.6640 4,609.292
9 Worker 1.4641 0.6903 11.5966 0.0376 4.2783 0.0190 4.2973 1.1420 0.0175 1.1595 3,796.747 3 3,796.747
3 0.0815 0.0847 3,824.012
0 Total 1.6879 9.8893 14.2639 0.0793 5.6674 0.0811 5.7485 1.5460 0.0769 1.6229 8,207.657 3 8,207.657
3 0.1021 0.7486 8,433.304
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 21 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2201 9.1343 2.6337 0.0409 1.4842 0.0617 1.5459 0.4274 0.0590 0.4864 4,321.521 7 4,321.521
7 0.0199 0.6498 4,515.643
0 Worker 1.3696 0.6259 10.9154 0.0365 4.6413 0.0179 4.6593 1.2311 0.0165 1.2476 3,684.565 6 3,684.565
6 0.0741 0.0801 3,710.288
3 Total 1.5897 9.7602 13.5491 0.0773 6.1255 0.0796 6.2052 1.6585 0.0755 1.7340 8,006.087 3 8,006.087
3 0.0940 0.7299 8,225.931
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 22 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2201 9.1343 2.6337 0.0409 1.3891 0.0617 1.4508 0.4040 0.0590 0.4630 4,321.521 7 4,321.521
7 0.0199 0.6498 4,515.643
0 Worker 1.3696 0.6259 10.9154 0.0365 4.2783 0.0179 4.2962 1.1420 0.0165 1.1585 3,684.565 6 3,684.565
6 0.0741 0.0801 3,710.288
3 Total 1.5897 9.7602 13.5491 0.0773 5.6674 0.0796 5.7470 1.5460 0.0755 1.6215 8,006.087 3 8,006.087
3 0.0940 0.7299 8,225.931
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 23 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2170 9.0874 2.6071 0.0401 1.4842 0.0613 1.5455 0.4274 0.0587 0.4860 4,236.689 9 4,236.689
9 0.0193 0.6362 4,426.751
4 Worker 1.2846 0.5731 10.3554 0.0355 4.6413 0.0168 4.6582 1.2311 0.0155 1.2466 3,584.482 4 3,584.482
4 0.0679 0.0764 3,608.935
0 Total 1.5016 9.6605 12.9625 0.0755 6.1255 0.0781 6.2037 1.6585 0.0741 1.7326 7,821.172 3 7,821.172
3 0.0871 0.7125 8,035.686
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 24 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2170 9.0874 2.6071 0.0401 1.3891 0.0613 1.4504 0.4040 0.0587 0.4627 4,236.689 9 4,236.689
9 0.0193 0.6362 4,426.751
4 Worker 1.2846 0.5731 10.3554 0.0355 4.2783 0.0168 4.2951 1.1420 0.0155 1.1575 3,584.482 4 3,584.482
4 0.0679 0.0764 3,608.935
0 Total 1.5016 9.6605 12.9625 0.0755 5.6674 0.0781 5.7455 1.5460 0.0741 1.6201 7,821.172 3 7,821.172
3 0.0871 0.7125 8,035.686
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 25 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2142 9.0340 2.5848 0.0393 1.4842 0.0609 1.5451 0.4274 0.0582 0.4856 4,154.591 6 4,154.591
6 0.0188 0.6231 4,340.737
6 Worker 1.2065 0.5297 9.8827 0.0346 4.6413 0.0157 4.6571 1.2311 0.0145 1.2456 3,495.391 6 3,495.391
6 0.0624 0.0733 3,518.793
1 Total 1.4208 9.5637 12.4675 0.0739 6.1256 0.0766 6.2022 1.6585 0.0727 1.7312 7,649.983 2 7,649.983
2 0.0812 0.6964 7,859.530
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 26 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2142 9.0340 2.5848 0.0393 1.3891 0.0609 1.4500 0.4040 0.0582 0.4622 4,154.591 6 4,154.591
6 0.0188 0.6231 4,340.737
6 Worker 1.2065 0.5297 9.8827 0.0346 4.2783 0.0157 4.2940 1.1420 0.0145 1.1565 3,495.391 6 3,495.391
6 0.0624 0.0733 3,518.793
1 Total 1.4208 9.5637 12.4675 0.0739 5.6674 0.0766 5.7440 1.5460 0.0727 1.6187 7,649.983 2 7,649.983
2 0.0812 0.6964 7,859.530
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 27 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0320 0.0141 0.2624 9.2000e-
004

0.1232 4.2000e-
004

0.1236 0.0327 3.8000e-
004

0.0331 92.7980 92.7980 1.6600e-
003

1.9500e-
003

93.4193
Total 0.0320 0.0141 0.2624 9.2000e-
004

0.1232 4.2000e-
004

0.1236 0.0327 3.8000e-
004

0.0331 92.7980 92.7980 1.6600e-
003

1.9500e-
003

93.4193
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 28 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0320 0.0141 0.2624 9.2000e-
004

0.1136 4.2000e-
004

0.1140 0.0303 3.8000e-
004

0.0307 92.7980 92.7980 1.6600e-
003

1.9500e-
003

93.4193
Total 0.0320 0.0141 0.2624 9.2000e-
004

0.1136 4.2000e-
004

0.1140 0.0303 3.8000e-
004

0.0307 92.7980 92.7980 1.6600e-
003

1.9500e-
003

93.4193
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 29 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 192.4515 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 192.6224 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2413 0.1060 1.9765 6.9200e-
003

0.9283 3.1500e-
003

0.9314 0.2462 2.9000e-
003

0.2491 699.0783 699.0783 0.0125 0.0147 703.7586
Total 0.2413 0.1060 1.9765 6.9200e-
003

0.9283 3.1500e-
003

0.9314 0.2462 2.9000e-
003

0.2491 699.0783 699.0783 0.0125 0.0147 703.7586
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 30 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 192.6224 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2413 0.1060 1.9765 6.9200e-
003

0.8557 3.1500e-
003

0.8588 0.2284 2.9000e-
003

0.2313 699.0783 699.0783 0.0125 0.0147 703.7586
Total 0.2413 0.1060 1.9765 6.9200e-
003

0.8557 3.1500e-
003

0.8588 0.2284 2.9000e-
003

0.2313 699.0783 699.0783 0.0125 0.0147 703.7586
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 31 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2030
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 192.4515 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1308 0.8563 1.7977 2.9700e-
003

0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 281.4481 281.4481 0.0114 281.7328 Total 192.5823 0.8563 1.7977 2.9700e-
003

0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 281.4481 281.4481 0.0114 281.7328 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2268 0.0987 1.8973 6.7600e-
003

0.9283 2.9500e-
003

0.9312 0.2462 2.7100e-
003

0.2489 683.2650 683.2650 0.0116 0.0142 687.7707
Total 0.2268 0.0987 1.8973 6.7600e-
003

0.9283 2.9500e-
003

0.9312 0.2462 2.7100e-
003

0.2489 683.2650 683.2650 0.0116 0.0142 687.7707
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 32 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0114 281.7328 Total 192.5823 0.8563 1.7977 2.9700e-
003

0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0114 281.7328 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2268 0.0987 1.8973 6.7600e-
003

0.8557 2.9500e-
003

0.8586 0.2284 2.7100e-
003

0.2311 683.2650 683.2650 0.0116 0.0142 687.7707
Total 0.2268 0.0987 1.8973 6.7600e-
003

0.8557 2.9500e-
003

0.8586 0.2284 2.7100e-
003

0.2311 683.2650 683.2650 0.0116 0.0142 687.7707
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 33 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 108.1495 110.9425 777.5670 1.8154 210.9697 1.2992 212.2689 56.2389 1.2168 57.4557 184,973.1 695
184,973.1
695

9.7304 9.3623 188,006.4
017
Unmitigated 108.1495 110.9425 777.5670 1.8154 210.9697 1.2992 212.2689 56.2389 1.2168 57.4557 184,973.1 695
184,973.1
695

9.7304 9.3623 188,006.4
017

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 34 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Regional Shopping Center 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 35 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.0 Area Detail

0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.414
2 1,014.414
2 0.0194 0.0186 1,020.442
3 Regional
Shopping Center
36737.2 0.3962 3.6017 3.0254 0.0216 0.2737 0.2737 0.2737 0.2737 4,322.018 1 4,322.018
1 0.0828 0.0792 4,347.701
6 Total 0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

8.62252 0.0930 0.7946 0.3381 5.0700e-
003

0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.414
2 1,014.414
2 0.0194 0.0186 1,020.442
3 Regional
Shopping Center

36.7372 0.3962 3.6017 3.0254 0.0216 0.2737 0.2737 0.2737 0.2737 4,322.018 1 4,322.018
1 0.0828 0.0792 4,347.701
6 Total 0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 36 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Unmitigated 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 37 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

5.7999 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

30.5581 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.2883 2.4634 1.0482 0.0157 0.1992 0.1992 0.1992 0.1992 0.0000 3,144.705 9 3,144.705
9 0.0603 0.0577 3,163.393
3 Landscaping 0.6753 0.2572 22.3341 1.1900e-
003

0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 40.3625 40.3625 0.0389 41.3342 Total 37.3216 2.7205 23.3824 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 38 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

5.7999 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 40.3625 40.3625 0.0389 41.3342 Total 37.3216 2.7205 23.3824 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:40 PMPage 39 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Off-road Equipment -
Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Trips consistent with Traffic Impact Assessment (Fehr & Peers). Institute of Transportation Engineers 2017.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 51

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2030Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 1 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Fleet Mix -

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 5 tblLandUse LotAcreage 26.58 88.61
tblLandUse LotAcreage 16.88 11.27
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 11.27 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 11.27 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 2 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6913 38.8919 29.5416 0.0635 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 6,150.462 1 6,150.462
1 1.9492 4.6000e-
003
6,200.564
8 2023 3.5237 34.5578 32.0974 0.1086 9.3679 1.4253 10.7932 3.6973 1.3113 5.0086 0.0000 11,013.30 29 11,013.30
29 1.9487 0.8235 11,277.64
21 2024 3.2859 24.4150 31.0125 0.1066 6.1255 0.6968 6.8223 1.6584 0.6560 2.3145 0.0000 10,809.97 04 10,809.97
04 0.7404 0.8025 11,067.63
16 2025 3.0639 23.2887 30.0434 0.1046 6.1255 0.6100 6.7356 1.6584 0.5744 2.2329 0.0000 10,605.24 14 10,605.24
14 0.7249 0.7816 10,856.26
97 2026 2.9645 23.1385 29.3969 0.1027 6.1255 0.6089 6.7344 1.6584 0.5734 2.2318 0.0000 10,409.45 38 10,409.45
38 0.7148 0.7618 10,654.34
80 2027 2.8751 22.9911 28.7676 0.1009 6.1255 0.6074 6.7329 1.6585 0.5719 2.2304 0.0000 10,219.06 95 10,219.06
95 0.7058 0.7423 10,457.93
20 2028 2.7942 22.8770 28.2486 0.0992 6.1255 0.6059 6.7314 1.6585 0.5705 2.2290 0.0000 10,043.99 48 10,043.99
48 0.6982 0.7245 10,277.33
80 2029 192.8529 22.7673 27.8066 0.0976 6.1256 0.6043 6.7299 1.6585 0.5691 2.2276 0.0000 9,881.431 8 9,881.431
8 0.7156 0.7078 10,109.64
99 2030 192.7995 0.9755 3.5362 9.0900e-
003

0.9283 0.0233 0.9515 0.2462 0.0230 0.2692 0.0000 899.6186 899.6186 0.0248 0.0160 905.0199 Maximum 192.8529 38.8919 32.0974 0.1086 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 11,013.30 29 11,013.30
29 1.9492 0.8235 11,277.64
21 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 3 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6913 38.8919 29.5416 0.0635 8.9820 1.6357 10.5953 4.5825 1.5049 6.0667 0.0000 6,150.462 1 6,150.462
1 1.9492 4.6000e-
003
6,200.564
8 2023 3.5237 34.5578 32.0974 0.1086 5.6673 1.4253 6.4513 1.6846 1.3113 2.9959 0.0000 11,013.30 29 11,013.30
29 1.9487 0.8235 11,277.64
21 2024 3.2859 24.4150 31.0125 0.1066 5.6673 0.6968 6.3642 1.5460 0.6560 2.2020 0.0000 10,809.97 04 10,809.97
04 0.7404 0.8025 11,067.63
16 2025 3.0639 23.2887 30.0434 0.1046 5.6674 0.6100 6.2774 1.5460 0.5744 2.1204 0.0000 10,605.24 14 10,605.24
14 0.7249 0.7816 10,856.26
97 2026 2.9645 23.1385 29.3969 0.1027 5.6674 0.6089 6.2763 1.5460 0.5734 2.1193 0.0000 10,409.45 38 10,409.45
38 0.7148 0.7618 10,654.34
80 2027 2.8751 22.9911 28.7676 0.1009 5.6674 0.6074 6.2748 1.5460 0.5719 2.1179 0.0000 10,219.06 95 10,219.06
95 0.7058 0.7423 10,457.93
20 2028 2.7942 22.8770 28.2486 0.0992 5.6674 0.6059 6.2732 1.5460 0.5705 2.1165 0.0000 10,043.99 48 10,043.99
48 0.6982 0.7245 10,277.33
80 2029 192.8529 22.7673 27.8066 0.0976 5.6674 0.6043 6.2717 1.5460 0.5691 2.1151 0.0000 9,881.431 8 9,881.431
8 0.7156 0.7078 10,109.64
99 2030 192.7995 0.9755 3.5362 9.0900e-
003

0.8557 0.0233 0.8789 0.2284 0.0230 0.2514 0.0000 899.6186 899.6186 0.0248 0.0160 905.0199 Maximum 192.8529 38.8919 32.0974 0.1086 8.9820 1.6357 10.5953 4.5825 1.5049 6.0667 0.0000 11,013.30 29 11,013.30
29 1.9492 0.8235 11,277.64
21 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.94 0.00 24.42 34.38 0.00 27.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 4 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Energy 0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 Mobile 84.6514 125.0591 822.0266 1.6860 210.9697 1.3006 212.2703 56.2389 1.2181 57.4571 171,908.7 987
171,908.7
987

11.1846 10.0812 175,192.6
080
Total 122.4621 132.1759 848.7725 1.7296 210.9697 1.9616 212.9314 56.2389 1.8792 58.1182 0.0000 180,430.2 993
180,430.2
993

11.3861 10.2367 183,765.4
795
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Energy 0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 Mobile 84.6514 125.0591 822.0266 1.6860 210.9697 1.3006 212.2703 56.2389 1.2181 57.4571 171,908.7 987
171,908.7
987

11.1846 10.0812 175,192.6
080
Total 122.4621 132.1759 848.7725 1.7296 210.9697 1.9616 212.9314 56.2389 1.8792 58.1182 0.0000 180,430.2 993
180,430.2
993

11.3861 10.2367 183,765.4
795
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 5 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 546,750; Residential Outdoor: 182,250; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,736,925; Non-Residential Outdoor: 578,975; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 6 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 565.00 219.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 113.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 7 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1479 7.5000e-
004

0.1486 0.0392 6.9000e-
004

0.0399 125.1464 125.1464 4.5300e-
003

4.1400e-
003
126.4941
Total 0.0598 0.0436 0.4501 1.2400e-
003

0.1479 7.5000e-
004

0.1486 0.0392 6.9000e-
004

0.0399 125.1464 125.1464 4.5300e-
003

4.1400e-
003
126.4941
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 8 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.8457 1.6126 10.4582 4.5461 1.4836 6.0297 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0598 0.0436 0.4501 1.2400e-
003

0.1363 7.5000e-
004

0.1371 0.0364 6.9000e-
004

0.0371 125.1464 125.1464 4.5300e-
003

4.1400e-
003
126.4941
Total 0.0598 0.0436 0.4501 1.2400e-
003

0.1363 7.5000e-
004

0.1371 0.0364 6.9000e-
004

0.0371 125.1464 125.1464 4.5300e-
003

4.1400e-
003
126.4941
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 9 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1643 8.3000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.7000e-
004

0.0444 139.0515 139.0515 5.0300e-
003

4.6000e-
003
140.5490
Total 0.0664 0.0484 0.5001 1.3800e-
003

0.1643 8.3000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.7000e-
004

0.0444 139.0515 139.0515 5.0300e-
003

4.6000e-
003
140.5490
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 10 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 4.1416 1.6349 5.7765 1.6442 1.5041 3.1483 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0664 0.0484 0.5001 1.3800e-
003

0.1514 8.3000e-
004

0.1523 0.0404 7.7000e-
004

0.0412 139.0515 139.0515 5.0300e-
003

4.6000e-
003
140.5490
Total 0.0664 0.0484 0.5001 1.3800e-
003

0.1514 8.3000e-
004

0.1523 0.0404 7.7000e-
004

0.0412 139.0515 139.0515 5.0300e-
003

4.6000e-
003
140.5490
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 11 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1643 7.9000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.2000e-
004

0.0443 134.5767 134.5767 4.5100e-
003

4.2200e-
003
135.9479
Total 0.0611 0.0422 0.4584 1.3300e-
003

0.1643 7.9000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.2000e-
004

0.0443 134.5767 134.5767 4.5100e-
003

4.2200e-
003
135.9479
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 12 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 4.1416 1.4245 5.5661 1.6442 1.3105 2.9547 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0611 0.0422 0.4584 1.3300e-
003

0.1514 7.9000e-
004

0.1522 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0412 134.5767 134.5767 4.5100e-
003

4.2200e-
003
135.9479
Total 0.0611 0.0422 0.4584 1.3300e-
003

0.1514 7.9000e-
004

0.1522 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0412 134.5767 134.5767 4.5100e-
003

4.2200e-
003
135.9479
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 13 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2247 9.9183 2.9047 0.0440 1.4841 0.0621 1.5462 0.4273 0.0594 0.4867 4,656.301 9 4,656.301
9 0.0225 0.7042 4,866.709
3 Worker 1.7263 1.1932 12.9488 0.0376 4.6413 0.0222 4.6635 1.2311 0.0204 1.2515 3,801.791 1 3,801.791
1 0.1274 0.1193 3,840.526
7 Total 1.9509 11.1115 15.8534 0.0816 6.1255 0.0843 6.2097 1.6584 0.0798 1.7382 8,458.093 0 8,458.093
0 0.1499 0.8235 8,707.236
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 14 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2247 9.9183 2.9047 0.0440 1.3890 0.0621 1.4511 0.4040 0.0594 0.4634 4,656.301 9 4,656.301
9 0.0225 0.7042 4,866.709
3 Worker 1.7263 1.1932 12.9488 0.0376 4.2783 0.0222 4.3005 1.1420 0.0204 1.1624 3,801.791 1 3,801.791
1 0.1274 0.1193 3,840.526
7 Total 1.9509 11.1115 15.8534 0.0816 5.6673 0.0843 5.7516 1.5460 0.0798 1.6258 8,458.093 0 8,458.093
0 0.1499 0.8235 8,707.236
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 15 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2191 9.9236 2.8488 0.0433 1.4842 0.0626 1.5468 0.4273 0.0599 0.4872 4,583.998 2 4,583.998
2 0.0215 0.6924 4,790.882
4 Worker 1.5953 1.0476 11.9969 0.0363 4.6413 0.0209 4.6623 1.2311 0.0192 1.2503 3,670.273 3 3,670.273
3 0.1145 0.1101 3,705.941
6 Total 1.8143 10.9712 14.8457 0.0797 6.1255 0.0835 6.2090 1.6584 0.0791 1.7376 8,254.271 5 8,254.271
5 0.1360 0.8025 8,496.824
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 16 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2191 9.9236 2.8488 0.0433 1.3890 0.0626 1.4516 0.4040 0.0599 0.4639 4,583.998 2 4,583.998
2 0.0215 0.6924 4,790.882
4 Worker 1.5953 1.0476 11.9969 0.0363 4.2783 0.0209 4.2992 1.1420 0.0192 1.1612 3,670.273 3 3,670.273
3 0.1145 0.1101 3,705.941
6 Total 1.8143 10.9712 14.8457 0.0797 5.6673 0.0835 5.7508 1.5460 0.0791 1.6251 8,254.271 5 8,254.271
5 0.1360 0.8025 8,496.824
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 17 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2142 9.8893 2.8004 0.0426 1.4842 0.0626 1.5468 0.4273 0.0599 0.4872 4,502.507 3 4,502.507
3 0.0207 0.6792 4,705.422
8 Worker 1.4823 0.9297 11.1583 0.0351 4.6413 0.0199 4.6612 1.2311 0.0183 1.2494 3,546.259 7 3,546.259
7 0.1033 0.1024 3,579.348
8 Total 1.6965 10.8190 13.9587 0.0777 6.1255 0.0825 6.2080 1.6584 0.0782 1.7366 8,048.767 0 8,048.767
0 0.1240 0.7816 8,284.771
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 18 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2142 9.8893 2.8004 0.0426 1.3891 0.0626 1.4517 0.4040 0.0599 0.4639 4,502.507 3 4,502.507
3 0.0207 0.6792 4,705.422
8 Worker 1.4823 0.9297 11.1583 0.0351 4.2783 0.0199 4.2982 1.1420 0.0183 1.1603 3,546.259 7 3,546.259
7 0.1033 0.1024 3,579.348
8 Total 1.6965 10.8190 13.9587 0.0777 5.6674 0.0825 5.7498 1.5460 0.0782 1.6242 8,048.767 0 8,048.767
0 0.1240 0.7816 8,284.771
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 19 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2100 9.8339 2.7608 0.0418 1.4842 0.0623 1.5465 0.4273 0.0596 0.4869 4,419.434 4 4,419.434
4 0.0199 0.6657 4,618.317
9 Worker 1.3871 0.8350 10.5515 0.0340 4.6413 0.0190 4.6604 1.2311 0.0175 1.2486 3,433.545 0 3,433.545
0 0.0939 0.0961 3,464.532
1 Total 1.5971 10.6688 13.3122 0.0758 6.1255 0.0813 6.2068 1.6584 0.0771 1.7355 7,852.979 4 7,852.979
4 0.1138 0.7618 8,082.849
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 20 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2100 9.8339 2.7608 0.0418 1.3891 0.0623 1.4514 0.4040 0.0596 0.4636 4,419.434 4 4,419.434
4 0.0199 0.6657 4,618.317
9 Worker 1.3871 0.8350 10.5515 0.0340 4.2783 0.0190 4.2973 1.1420 0.0175 1.1595 3,433.545 0 3,433.545
0 0.0939 0.0961 3,464.532
1 Total 1.5971 10.6688 13.3122 0.0758 5.6674 0.0813 5.7487 1.5460 0.0771 1.6231 7,852.979 4 7,852.979
4 0.1138 0.7618 8,082.849
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 21 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2062 9.7647 2.7265 0.0409 1.4842 0.0619 1.5461 0.4274 0.0592 0.4865 4,329.918 9 4,329.918
9 0.0192 0.6514 4,524.528
6 Worker 1.3015 0.7568 9.9564 0.0330 4.6413 0.0179 4.6593 1.2311 0.0165 1.2476 3,332.676 2 3,332.676
2 0.0857 0.0909 3,361.905
3 Total 1.5077 10.5214 12.6829 0.0739 6.1255 0.0798 6.2053 1.6585 0.0757 1.7341 7,662.595 1 7,662.595
1 0.1049 0.7423 7,886.433
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 22 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2062 9.7647 2.7265 0.0409 1.3891 0.0619 1.4510 0.4040 0.0592 0.4632 4,329.918 9 4,329.918
9 0.0192 0.6514 4,524.528
6 Worker 1.3015 0.7568 9.9564 0.0330 4.2783 0.0179 4.2962 1.1420 0.0165 1.1585 3,332.676 2 3,332.676
2 0.0857 0.0909 3,361.905
3 Total 1.5077 10.5214 12.6829 0.0739 5.6674 0.0798 5.7472 1.5460 0.0757 1.6217 7,662.595 1 7,662.595
1 0.1049 0.7423 7,886.433
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 23 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2031 9.7146 2.6996 0.0401 1.4842 0.0615 1.5457 0.4274 0.0588 0.4862 4,244.954 4 4,244.954
4 0.0187 0.6378 4,435.493
7 Worker 1.2238 0.6928 9.4643 0.0321 4.6413 0.0168 4.6582 1.2311 0.0155 1.2466 3,242.566 1 3,242.566
1 0.0786 0.0866 3,270.346
2 Total 1.4268 10.4073 12.1639 0.0722 6.1255 0.0783 6.2038 1.6585 0.0743 1.7327 7,487.520 4 7,487.520
4 0.0973 0.7245 7,705.839
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 24 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2031 9.7146 2.6996 0.0401 1.3891 0.0615 1.4506 0.4040 0.0588 0.4628 4,244.954 4 4,244.954
4 0.0187 0.6378 4,435.493
7 Worker 1.2238 0.6928 9.4643 0.0321 4.2783 0.0168 4.2951 1.1420 0.0155 1.1575 3,242.566 1 3,242.566
1 0.0786 0.0866 3,270.346
2 Total 1.4268 10.4073 12.1639 0.0722 5.6674 0.0783 5.7457 1.5460 0.0743 1.6203 7,487.520 4 7,487.520
4 0.0973 0.7245 7,705.839
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 25 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2003 9.6576 2.6770 0.0394 1.4842 0.0610 1.5452 0.4274 0.0584 0.4857 4,162.720 5 4,162.720
5 0.0181 0.6247 4,349.334
8 Worker 1.1525 0.6401 9.0450 0.0313 4.6413 0.0157 4.6571 1.2311 0.0145 1.2456 3,162.236 9 3,162.236
9 0.0725 0.0831 3,188.817
1 Total 1.3528 10.2976 11.7220 0.0707 6.1256 0.0768 6.2023 1.6585 0.0729 1.7313 7,324.957 4 7,324.957
4 0.0907 0.7078 7,538.151
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 26 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2003 9.6576 2.6770 0.0394 1.3891 0.0610 1.4501 0.4040 0.0584 0.4624 4,162.720 5 4,162.720
5 0.0181 0.6247 4,349.334
8 Worker 1.1525 0.6401 9.0450 0.0313 4.2783 0.0157 4.2940 1.1420 0.0145 1.1565 3,162.236 9 3,162.236
9 0.0725 0.0831 3,188.817
1 Total 1.3528 10.2976 11.7220 0.0707 5.6674 0.0768 5.7442 1.5460 0.0729 1.6189 7,324.957 4 7,324.957
4 0.0907 0.7078 7,538.151
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 27 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.1232 4.2000e-
004

0.1236 0.0327 3.8000e-
004

0.0331 83.9532 83.9532 1.9300e-
003

2.2100e-
003

84.6589
Total 0.0306 0.0170 0.2401 8.3000e-
004

0.1232 4.2000e-
004

0.1236 0.0327 3.8000e-
004

0.0331 83.9532 83.9532 1.9300e-
003

2.2100e-
003

84.6589
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 28 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0306 0.0170 0.2401 8.3000e-
004

0.1136 4.2000e-
004

0.1140 0.0303 3.8000e-
004

0.0307 83.9532 83.9532 1.9300e-
003

2.2100e-
003

84.6589
Total 0.0306 0.0170 0.2401 8.3000e-
004

0.1136 4.2000e-
004

0.1140 0.0303 3.8000e-
004

0.0307 83.9532 83.9532 1.9300e-
003

2.2100e-
003

84.6589
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 29 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 192.6224 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.9283 3.1500e-
003

0.9314 0.2462 2.9000e-
003

0.2491 632.4474 632.4474 0.0145 0.0166 637.7634
Total 0.2305 0.1280 1.8090 6.2600e-
003

0.9283 3.1500e-
003

0.9314 0.2462 2.9000e-
003

0.2491 632.4474 632.4474 0.0145 0.0166 637.7634
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 30 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 192.6224 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.8557 3.1500e-
003

0.8588 0.2284 2.9000e-
003

0.2313 632.4474 632.4474 0.0145 0.0166 637.7634
Total 0.2305 0.1280 1.8090 6.2600e-
003

0.8557 3.1500e-
003

0.8588 0.2284 2.9000e-
003

0.2313 632.4474 632.4474 0.0145 0.0166 637.7634
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 31 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 281.4481 281.4481 0.0114 281.7328 Total 192.5823 0.8563 1.7977 2.9700e-
003

0.9283 2.9500e-
003

0.9312 0.2462 2.7100e-
003

0.2489 618.1705 618.1705 0.0134 0.0160 623.2871
Total 0.2173 0.1192 1.7384 6.1200e-
003

0.9283 2.9500e-
003

0.9312 0.2462 2.7100e-
003

0.2489 618.1705 618.1705 0.0134 0.0160 623.2871
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 32 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0114 281.7328 Total 192.5823 0.8563 1.7977 2.9700e-
003

0.8557 2.9500e-
003

0.8586 0.2284 2.7100e-
003

0.2311 618.1705 618.1705 0.0134 0.0160 623.2871
Total 0.2173 0.1192 1.7384 6.1200e-
003

0.8557 2.9500e-
003

0.8586 0.2284 2.7100e-
003

0.2311 618.1705 618.1705 0.0134 0.0160 623.2871
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 33 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 84.6514 125.0591 822.0266 1.6860 210.9697 1.3006 212.2703 56.2389 1.2181 57.4571 171,908.7 987
171,908.7
987

11.1846 10.0812 175,192.6
080
Unmitigated 84.6514 125.0591 822.0266 1.6860 210.9697 1.3006 212.2703 56.2389 1.2181 57.4571 171,908.7 987
171,908.7
987

11.1846 10.0812 175,192.6
080

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 34 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Regional Shopping Center 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 35 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.0 Area Detail

8.62252 0.0930 0.7946 0.3381 5.0700e-
003

0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.414
2 1,014.414
2 0.0194 0.0186 1,020.442
3 Regional
Shopping Center

36.7372 0.3962 3.6017 3.0254 0.0216 0.2737 0.2737 0.2737 0.2737 4,322.018 1 4,322.018
1 0.0828 0.0792 4,347.701
6 Total 0.4892 4.3963 3.3636 0.0267 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 0.3380 5,336.432 2 5,336.432
2 0.1023 0.0978 5,368.144
0 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 36 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Unmitigated 37.3216 2.7205 23.3823 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 37 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

5.7999 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 40.3625 40.3625 0.0389 41.3342 Total 37.3216 2.7205 23.3824 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 38 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

5.7999 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 0.1240 40.3625 40.3625 0.0389 41.3342 Total 37.3216 2.7205 23.3824 0.0169 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.3231 0.0000 3,185.068 4 3,185.068
4 0.0991 0.0577 3,204.727
5 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 39 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 3/31/2022 2:41 PMPage 40 of 40 The Previously Approved Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: County
Region: San Joaquin
Calendar Year: 2022, 2030
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC202x Categories
Units: miles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year for Energy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000 gallons/year for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT CVMT EVMT Trips Fuel Consumption MPG (Derived) San Joaquin 2022 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 64.18276106 983114.2639 983114.2639 0 166798.1594 113.790052 8.64 San Joaquin 2030 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 77.91699798 1052062.811 1052062.811 0 202490.6944 115.9209951 9.08 San Joaquin 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 245832.5119 3415793856 3415793856 0 394415289.6 121526.7684 28.11 San Joaquin 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 747.597033 8552210.782 8552210.782 0 1116714.388 202.5712829 42.22 San Joaquin 2030 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 254418.6659 3555081583 3555081583 0 406617917.6 111881.2187 31.78 San Joaquin 2030 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 397.5680304 4402636.879 4402636.879 0 595374.5304 96.77963754 45.49 San Joaquin 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 22627.08052 254906082.1 254906082.1 0 33921505.03 10869.91585 23.45 San Joaquin 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7.047782881 28643.33409 28643.33409 0 7315.906291 1.17050914 24.47 San Joaquin 2030 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 19319.25133 230400973.5 230400973.5 0 29270642 8647.502649 26.64 San Joaquin 2030 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.386071985 2532.723059 2532.723059 0 432.8538191 0.094372393 26.84 San Joaquin 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 97154.07981 1327006241 1327006241 0 156148852 59035.46063 22.48 San Joaquin 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 248.8605386 3715266.012 3715266.012 0 408516.5971 118.6311075 31.32 San Joaquin 2030 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 121581.9972 1694407768 1694407768 0 195618928.1 65317.16905 25.94 San Joaquin 2030 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 401.6587951 5921566.017 5921566.017 0 660840.358 169.5648313 34.92 San Joaquin 2022 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 10032.88768 112383473.8 112383473.8 0 48878350.34 12349.75639 9.10 San Joaquin 2022 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9047.421916 103983412.9 103983412.9 0 37214295.84 6588.299532 15.78 San Joaquin 2030 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 8636.175694 100584529.7 100584529.7 0 42073831.03 9749.636516 10.32 San Joaquin 2030 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7266.804252 78711686.22 78711686.22 0 29890172.66 4898.611729 16.07 San Joaquin 2022 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1192.956774 13475070.21 13475070.21 0 5811862.047 1640.891005 8.21 San Joaquin 2022 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3132.378704 37931318.99 37931318.99 0 12884252.43 2924.634355 12.97 San Joaquin 2030 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1010.080889 11363912.65 11363912.65 0 4920924.973 1248.168074 9.10 MHD San Joaquin 2030 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2911.506548 32424366.9 32424366.9 0 11975750.33 2395.577479 13.54 12.58 San Joaquin 2022 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 12156.83121 22852866.91 22852866.91 0 8436840.858 574.2253718 39.80 San Joaquin 2030 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 11782.19458 21599699.48 21599699.48 0 8176843.039 527.0198516 40.98 San Joaquin 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 95564.44336 1148172249 1148172249 0 150054305.6 62988.61289 18.23 San Joaquin 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1375.554752 18880934.92 18880934.92 0 2249263.776 797.8242725 23.67 San Joaquin 2030 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 89351.24041 1090180335 1090180335 0 139702643.5 52283.062 20.85 San Joaquin 2030 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1300.084582 15515711.18 15515711.18 0 2039048.221 609.1285809 25.47 San Joaquin 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1600.88645 4527842.043 4527842.043 0 52369.92651 1026.718509 4.41 San Joaquin 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 647.0575838 1864836.858 1864836.858 0 21158.78299 198.2342323 9.41 San Joaquin 2030 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1046.923284 3051532.968 3051532.968 0 34248.08516 691.0838834 4.42 San Joaquin 2030 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 593.6778597 1625897.118 1625897.118 0 19413.26601 173.3330579 9.38 San Joaquin 2022 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 17.36532658 725245.3317 725245.3317 0 116524.1198 132.125375 5.49 San Joaquin 2030 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 21.84279383 755114.0864 755114.0864 0 146568.6415 129.0916579 5.85 San Joaquin 2022 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 190.8863856 2783028.979 2783028.979 0 1248896.32 598.6307691 4.65 San Joaquin 2030 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 142.7858447 1844530.505 1844530.505 0 934192.9523 365.1457621 5.05 San Joaquin 2022 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 6090118.27 6090118.27 0 0 1257.295456 4.84 San Joaquin 2030 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 6114484.956 6114484.956 0 0 1145.873619 5.34 San Joaquin 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 125.3894152 2223699.452 2223699.452 0 164009.355 219.7856778 10.12 San Joaquin 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 485.9784004 3614694.546 3614694.546 0 2301088.287 443.7107543 8.15 San Joaquin 2030 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 137.6688984 2474022.098 2474022.098 0 180070.9192 240.659992 10.28 San Joaquin 2030 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 472.583377 3294922.647 3294922.647 0 2237663.387 394.6247407 8.35 San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.0890437 210293.2226 210293.2226 0 72336.02194 23.84738494 8.82 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.03357054 207845.9831 207845.9831 0 71938.29275 22.31020272 9.32 San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13.58227373 288484.4857 288484.4857 0 97381.64291 32.62553013 8.84 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 12.9245166 287261.2642 287261.2642 0 92665.68211 30.92075047 9.29 San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 41.03348839 753818.2147 753818.2147 0 294200.2637 84.43793674 8.93 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 50.00197369 731928.2792 731928.2792 0 358502.1509 77.80206275 9.41 HHD San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 72.78191568 4728328.863 4728328.863 0 521828.8677 495.7091624 9.54 8.65 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 81.09772518 4969148.526 4969148.526 0 581451.2261 474.4552717 10.47 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 239.0980349 2541147.718 2541147.718 0 1064521.835 312.100003 8.14 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 254.8998619 2622134.491 2622134.491 0 1134875.361 306.4146501 8.56 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 153.4261699 1652891.973 1652891.973 0 683090.1306 204.7820753 8.07 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 166.0285585 1709497.809 1709497.809 0 739198.9892 200.5510915 8.52 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 669.7781872 7173217.658 7173217.658 0 2982013.236 882.4034098 8.13 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 719.8306466 7412214.514 7412214.514 0 3204858.798 866.628937 8.55 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 121.8173307 2064596.796 2064596.796 0 542359.9924 253.4340811 8.15 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 145.1086383 2277007.302 2277007.302 0 646058.4837 269.33536 8.45 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 458.6664735 5647630.508 5647630.508 0 1654281.543 670.5535241 8.42 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 463.4914259 5759891.182 5759891.182 0 1671683.796 652.3873729 8.83 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1145.440922 15945159.88 15945159.88 0 4131284.681 1880.533752 8.48 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1302.613735 16357453.3 16357453.3 0 4698163.011 1854.852574 8.82 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 900.2348993 11843070.67 11843070.67 0 3246895.216 1391.681049 8.51 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 967.5241645 12136875.29 12136875.29 0 3489588.754 1369.65408 8.86 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 546.2729605 7887491.996 7887491.996 0 1970253.612 908.6706235 8.68 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 700.7841908 8283914.957 8283914.957 0 2527532.357 934.6947684 8.86 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.69873229 156796.7583 156796.7583 0 38587.33171 18.49124984 8.48 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11.19156734 157945.7835 157945.7835 0 40364.84976 17.66922796 8.94 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 714.4980333 13263547.77 13263547.77 0 2576994.347 1484.370826 8.94 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 883.514131 14477150.86 14477150.86 0 3186588.087 1552.189976 9.33 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5.824249623 120402.6041 120402.6041 0 41758.47198 13.64837299 8.82 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.541376959 137416.5252 137416.5252 0 46900.10287 14.01668656 9.80 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7.810009498 165170.7215 165170.7215 0 55995.8937 18.67768852 8.84 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8.341142815 188510.7618 188510.7618 0 59803.99211 19.32741967 9.75 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 23.64662077 431595.8209 431595.8209 0 169540.5957 48.34053567 8.93 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 33.06851809 492584.014 492584.014 0 237093.3383 49.448756 9.96 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 39.99335241 3138238.303 3138238.303 0 286742.7383 328.4621548 9.55 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 44.56048205 3581698.305 3581698.305 0 319487.9618 332.90414 10.76 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 32.46897249 328830.7124 328830.7124 0 51968.53861 44.34689082 7.41 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 27.81125955 311441.5008 311441.5008 0 44513.58958 38.85875104 8.01 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 75.18627001 860300.2034 860300.2034 0 120340.1363 112.646177 7.64 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 75.38765272 836845.4011 836845.4011 0 120662.4614 104.1735487 8.03 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 127.0726581 1381351.207 1381351.207 0 203387.4137 180.6444001 7.65 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 116.7394301 1326340.44 1326340.44 0 186848.4623 163.21381 8.13 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 155.0745132 2102170.5 2102170.5 0 248206.0629 278.5009366 7.55 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 142.6483702 1999653.585 1999653.585 0 228317.2755 242.6043296 8.24 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 33.0723596 420846.4543 420846.4543 0 132077.7753 48.44157823 8.69 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 31.33664956 391517.5651 391517.5651 0 125146.0437 42.84503555 9.14 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.301149589 79368.92932 79368.92932 0 25164.271 9.17296451 8.65 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5.922101273 73890.62732 73890.62732 0 23650.50364 8.068457765 9.16 EXHIBIT 1
San Joaquin 2022 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7.184731387 110634.8643 110634.8643 0 28692.94327 12.6401735 8.75 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.55183963 101043.6339 101043.6339 0 26165.42675 10.94312101 9.23 San Joaquin 2022 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 579.4901376 8873213.878 8873213.878 0 3791381.446 1932.185198 4.59 San Joaquin 2030 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 474.584898 8426557.293 8426557.293 0 3105026.747 1664.950995 5.06 San Joaquin 2022 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1465.651998 94322580.13 94322580.13 0 10508373.07 15770.2762 5.98 San Joaquin 2030 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1609.245461 101613876.1 101613876.1 0 11537903.74 15064.7061 6.75 San Joaquin 2022 T7 NNOOS Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1314.51908 111518369.3 111518369.3 0 9424786.321 18648.32321 5.98 San Joaquin 2030 T7 NNOOS Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1522.891634 131105894.1 131105894.1 0 10918767.52 18285.23877 7.17 San Joaquin 2022 T7 NOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 547.746265 40512642.66 40512642.66 0 3927209.261 6815.550603 5.94 San Joaquin 2030 T7 NOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 658.5047048 47628442.51 47628442.51 0 4721320.692 6863.504085 6.94 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Other Port Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 29.96782331 1613813.406 1613813.406 0 152965.3599 275.8291853 5.85 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Other Port Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 27.91380238 2026458.222 2026458.222 0 142480.9798 312.2690391 6.49 San Joaquin 2022 T7 POAK Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 130.9212733 4012315.2 4012315.2 0 668264.0737 701.2895659 5.72 San Joaquin 2030 T7 POAK Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 129.8802176 4415506.402 4415506.402 0 662950.1924 705.494381 6.26 San Joaquin 2022 T7 POLA Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 133.7447014 5448794.577 5448794.577 0 682675.7542 952.8299882 5.72 San Joaquin 2030 T7 POLA Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 159.2318432 7377820.897 7377820.897 0 812770.2817 1237.769376 5.96 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 387.8868943 5120839.782 5120839.782 0 620836.2476 1005.029197 5.10 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 378.7173382 4998369.929 4998369.929 0 606159.8229 912.6515986 5.48 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 116.7544211 2677818.424 2677818.424 0 343145.9137 460.6989897 5.81 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 112.6092183 2344443.502 2344443.502 0 330962.997 374.2047054 6.27 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Single Dump Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 478.1812367 9536301.569 9536301.569 0 1405393.782 1654.245052 5.76 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Single Dump Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 552.6697334 9041303.241 9041303.241 0 1624318.453 1515.628914 5.97 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Single Other Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 984.7457086 17434952.94 17434952.94 0 2894207.028 2999.030833 5.81 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Single Other Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1393.522707 18377799.27 18377799.27 0 4095618.977 3026.5809 6.07 San Joaquin 2022 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 177.8487212 3596616.494 3596616.494 0 255248.4847 1442.776049 2.49 San Joaquin 2030 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 143.1275202 2896116.632 2896116.632 0 205416.617 1074.048992 2.70 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2518.433603 64864115.78 64864115.78 0 11416966.16 10747.18356 6.04 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3532.497356 73001804.65 73001804.65 0 16014082.21 11333.27524 6.44 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 22.55419755 333131.8573 333131.8573 0 90072.44333 58.51013889 5.69 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 25.09559532 333435.0862 333435.0862 0 100221.7695 55.50666475 6.01 San Joaquin 2022 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2.652755373 18719.50027 18719.50027 0 17355.95975 6.072843609 3.08 San Joaquin 2030 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 0.44185209 20186.51451 20186.51451 0 2890.868556 4.519734977 4.47 San Joaquin 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 48.76869755 1201484.843 1201484.843 0 63789.4564 255.7319762 4.70 San Joaquin 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 81.19085432 1839458.611 1839458.611 0 106197.6375 209.6089245 8.78 San Joaquin 2030 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 29.25530087 767161.6504 767161.6504 0 38265.93354 163.2503579 4.70 San Joaquin 2030 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 38.98485383 895451.8408 895451.8408 0 50992.18881 97.21612892 9.21 EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Operational) Energy Usage
Unmitigated:

Step 1:

Therefore:

Average Daily VMT:
88,308 Source: CalEEMod Output
Step 2: Given:

Fleet Mix (CalEEMod Output)
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

56.01% 5.39% 17.34% 13.10% 2.13% 0.55% 1.26% 1.65% 0.04% 0.03% 2.12% 0.10% 0.27% And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class - Year 2030 (EMFAC2021 Output) LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV MCY MH OBUS

31.78 26.64 25.94 20.85 40.98 4.42 5.05
Diesel MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class - Year 2030 (EMFAC2021 Output) LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD UBUS SBUS

16.06816187 13.53509423 8.504393618 5.493562034 9.210939077 8.34950855 Therefore:

Weighted Average MPG Factors
Gasoline: 29.0 Diesel: 10.9
Step 3: Therefore:
2,869 daily gallons of gasoline 465 daily gallons of diesel or
1,047,147 annual gallons of gasoline 169,779 annual gallons of diesel EXHIBIT 1
Off-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage
Note: For the sake of simplicity, and as a conservative estimation, it was assumed that all off-road vehicles use diesel fuel as an energy source.

Demolition (if applicable), Site preparation and grading off-road mobile vehicle on-site gallons of fuel are calculated below.

Given Factor: 979.7 metric tons CO2 (provided in CalEEMod Output File) Conversion Factor: 2204.6262 pounds per metric ton
Intermediate Result: 2,159,823 pounds CO2
Conversion Factor: 22.38 pounds CO2 per 1 gallon of diesel fuel Source: U.S. EIA, 2016 Final Result: 96,506.84 gallons diesel fuel http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=307&t=11 Mitigated Onsite Scenario Total CO2 (MT/yr) (provided in CalEEMod Output File) Site Preparation - 2022 100.32
Grading - 2022 73.62
Grading - 2023 349.02
Building Construction - 2023 152.99
EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Site Preparation Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
18 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
194
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

7.6 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 60 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 457 Total gallons of gasoline
EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Grading
Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
20 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
216
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

8.5 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 155 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 1,311 Total gallons of gasoline
EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Building Construction Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output) Total Daily Vendor Trips (CalEEMod Output) 565 5% 28 219 5% 11
Note: Assumes 5% of Plan Area under construction at given point in time (on average) until buildout.

Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output) Vendor Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 7.3
Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT: Average Vendor Daily VMT:
305 80
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2 Fleet Mix for Workers (CalEEMod Output)

0.5 0.25 0.25 MHD HHD
Assumed Fleet Mix for Vendors 0% 100%
And:

MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 Gasoline: Diesel:

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MHD HHD

28.11 23.45 22.48 8.50 5.49
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker (Gasoline) MPG Factor Weighted Average Vendor (Diesel) MPG Factor

25.5 5.5
Step 3: Therefore: Therefore:
12 Worker daily gallons of gasoline 15 Vendor daily gallons of diesel Step 4: 1550 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore: Therefore:
18,519 Total gallons of gasoline 22,554 Total gallons of diesel EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Paving
Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
15 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
162
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

6.3 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 110 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 698 Total gallons of gasoline
EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Architectural Coating Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
133 5% 7
Note: Assumes 5% of Plan Area under construction at given point in time (on average) until buildout.

Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
72 Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

2.8 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 110 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 309 Total gallons of gasoline
EXHIBIT 1
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.1) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: County
Region: San Joaquin
Calendar Year: 2022, 2030
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC202x Categories
Units: miles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year for Energy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000 gallons/year for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population Total VMT CVMT EVMT Trips Fuel Consumption MPG (Derived) San Joaquin 2022 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 64.18276106 983114.2639 983114.2639 0 166798.1594 113.790052 8.64 San Joaquin 2030 All Other Buses Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 77.91699798 1052062.811 1052062.811 0 202490.6944 115.9209951 9.08 San Joaquin 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 245832.5119 3415793856 3415793856 0 394415289.6 121526.7684 28.11 San Joaquin 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 747.597033 8552210.782 8552210.782 0 1116714.388 202.5712829 42.22 San Joaquin 2030 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 397.5680304 4402636.879 4402636.879 0 595374.5304 96.77963754 45.49 San Joaquin 2030 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 254418.6659 3555081583 3555081583 0 406617917.6 111881.2187 31.78 San Joaquin 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 22627.08052 254906082.1 254906082.1 0 33921505.03 10869.91585 23.45 San Joaquin 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7.047782881 28643.33409 28643.33409 0 7315.906291 1.17050914 24.47 San Joaquin 2030 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0.386071985 2532.723059 2532.723059 0 432.8538191 0.094372393 26.84 San Joaquin 2030 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 19319.25133 230400973.5 230400973.5 0 29270642 8647.502649 26.64 San Joaquin 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 97154.07981 1327006241 1327006241 0 156148852 59035.46063 22.48 San Joaquin 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 248.8605386 3715266.012 3715266.012 0 408516.5971 118.6311075 31.32 San Joaquin 2030 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 401.6587951 5921566.017 5921566.017 0 660840.358 169.5648313 34.92 San Joaquin 2030 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 121581.9972 1694407768 1694407768 0 195618928.1 65317.16905 25.94 San Joaquin 2022 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 10032.88768 112383473.8 112383473.8 0 48878350.34 12349.75639 9.10 San Joaquin 2022 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9047.421916 103983412.9 103983412.9 0 37214295.84 6588.299532 15.78 San Joaquin 2030 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7266.804252 78711686.22 78711686.22 0 29890172.66 4898.611729 16.07 San Joaquin 2030 LHD1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 8636.175694 100584529.7 100584529.7 0 42073831.03 9749.636516 10.32 San Joaquin 2022 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1192.956774 13475070.21 13475070.21 0 5811862.047 1640.891005 8.21 San Joaquin 2022 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3132.378704 37931318.99 37931318.99 0 12884252.43 2924.634355 12.97 San Joaquin 2030 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2911.506548 32424366.9 32424366.9 0 11975750.33 2395.577479 13.54 MHD San Joaquin 2030 LHD2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1010.080889 11363912.65 11363912.65 0 4920924.973 1248.168074 9.10 12.40 San Joaquin 2022 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 12156.83121 22852866.91 22852866.91 0 8436840.858 574.2253718 39.80 San Joaquin 2030 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 11782.19458 21599699.48 21599699.48 0 8176843.039 527.0198516 40.98 San Joaquin 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 95564.44336 1148172249 1148172249 0 150054305.6 62988.61289 18.23 San Joaquin 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1375.554752 18880934.92 18880934.92 0 2249263.776 797.8242725 23.67 San Joaquin 2030 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1300.084582 15515711.18 15515711.18 0 2039048.221 609.1285809 25.47 San Joaquin 2030 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 89351.24041 1090180335 1090180335 0 139702643.5 52283.062 20.85 San Joaquin 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1600.88645 4527842.043 4527842.043 0 52369.92651 1026.718509 4.41 San Joaquin 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 647.0575838 1864836.858 1864836.858 0 21158.78299 198.2342323 9.41 San Joaquin 2030 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 593.6778597 1625897.118 1625897.118 0 19413.26601 173.3330579 9.38 San Joaquin 2030 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1046.923284 3051532.968 3051532.968 0 34248.08516 691.0838834 4.42 San Joaquin 2022 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 17.36532658 725245.3317 725245.3317 0 116524.1198 132.125375 5.49 San Joaquin 2030 Motor Coach Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 21.84279383 755114.0864 755114.0864 0 146568.6415 129.0916579 5.85 San Joaquin 2022 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 190.8863856 2783028.979 2783028.979 0 1248896.32 598.6307691 4.65 San Joaquin 2030 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 142.7858447 1844530.505 1844530.505 0 934192.9523 365.1457621 5.05 San Joaquin 2022 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 6090118.27 6090118.27 0 0 1257.295456 4.84 San Joaquin 2030 PTO Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 0 6114484.956 6114484.956 0 0 1145.873619 5.34 San Joaquin 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 125.3894152 2223699.452 2223699.452 0 164009.355 219.7856778 10.12 San Joaquin 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 485.9784004 3614694.546 3614694.546 0 2301088.287 443.7107543 8.15 San Joaquin 2030 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 472.583377 3294922.647 3294922.647 0 2237663.387 394.6247407 8.35 San Joaquin 2030 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 137.6688984 2474022.098 2474022.098 0 180070.9192 240.659992 10.28 San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.0890437 210293.2226 210293.2226 0 72336.02194 23.84738494 8.82 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.03357054 207845.9831 207845.9831 0 71938.29275 22.31020272 9.32 San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13.58227373 288484.4857 288484.4857 0 97381.64291 32.62553013 8.84 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 12.9245166 287261.2642 287261.2642 0 92665.68211 30.92075047 9.29 San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 41.03348839 753818.2147 753818.2147 0 294200.2637 84.43793674 8.93 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 50.00197369 731928.2792 731928.2792 0 358502.1509 77.80206275 9.41 HHD San Joaquin 2022 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 72.78191568 4728328.863 4728328.863 0 521828.8677 495.7091624 9.54 8.65 San Joaquin 2030 T6 CAIRP Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 81.09772518 4969148.526 4969148.526 0 581451.2261 474.4552717 10.47 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 239.0980349 2541147.718 2541147.718 0 1064521.835 312.100003 8.14 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 254.8998619 2622134.491 2622134.491 0 1134875.361 306.4146501 8.56 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 153.4261699 1652891.973 1652891.973 0 683090.1306 204.7820753 8.07 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 166.0285585 1709497.809 1709497.809 0 739198.9892 200.5510915 8.52 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 669.7781872 7173217.658 7173217.658 0 2982013.236 882.4034098 8.13 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 719.8306466 7412214.514 7412214.514 0 3204858.798 866.628937 8.55 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 121.8173307 2064596.796 2064596.796 0 542359.9924 253.4340811 8.15 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Delivery Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 145.1086383 2277007.302 2277007.302 0 646058.4837 269.33536 8.45 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 458.6664735 5647630.508 5647630.508 0 1654281.543 670.5535241 8.42 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 4Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 463.4914259 5759891.182 5759891.182 0 1671683.796 652.3873729 8.83 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1145.440922 15945159.88 15945159.88 0 4131284.681 1880.533752 8.48 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 5Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1302.613735 16357453.3 16357453.3 0 4698163.011 1854.852574 8.82 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 900.2348993 11843070.67 11843070.67 0 3246895.216 1391.681049 8.51 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 967.5241645 12136875.29 12136875.29 0 3489588.754 1369.65408 8.86 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Other Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 546.2729605 7887491.996 7887491.996 0 1970253.612 908.6706235 8.68 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Other Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 700.7841908 8283914.957 8283914.957 0 2527532.357 934.6947684 8.86 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.69873229 156796.7583 156796.7583 0 38587.33171 18.49124984 8.48 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Tractor Class 6Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11.19156734 157945.7835 157945.7835 0 40364.84976 17.66922796 8.94 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 714.4980333 13263547.77 13263547.77 0 2576994.347 1484.370826 8.94 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Instate Tractor Class 7Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 883.514131 14477150.86 14477150.86 0 3186588.087 1552.189976 9.33 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5.824249623 120402.6041 120402.6041 0 41758.47198 13.64837299 8.82 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.541376959 137416.5252 137416.5252 0 46900.10287 14.01668656 9.80 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7.810009498 165170.7215 165170.7215 0 55995.8937 18.67768852 8.84 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8.341142815 188510.7618 188510.7618 0 59803.99211 19.32741967 9.75 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 23.64662077 431595.8209 431595.8209 0 169540.5957 48.34053567 8.93 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 33.06851809 492584.014 492584.014 0 237093.3383 49.448756 9.96 San Joaquin 2022 T6 OOS Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 39.99335241 3138238.303 3138238.303 0 286742.7383 328.4621548 9.55 San Joaquin 2030 T6 OOS Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 44.56048205 3581698.305 3581698.305 0 319487.9618 332.90414 10.76 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 32.46897249 328830.7124 328830.7124 0 51968.53861 44.34689082 7.41 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 4 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 27.81125955 311441.5008 311441.5008 0 44513.58958 38.85875104 8.01 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 75.18627001 860300.2034 860300.2034 0 120340.1363 112.646177 7.64 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 75.38765272 836845.4011 836845.4011 0 120662.4614 104.1735487 8.03 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 127.0726581 1381351.207 1381351.207 0 203387.4137 180.6444001 7.65 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 116.7394301 1326340.44 1326340.44 0 186848.4623 163.21381 8.13 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 155.0745132 2102170.5 2102170.5 0 248206.0629 278.5009366 7.55 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Public Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 142.6483702 1999653.585 1999653.585 0 228317.2755 242.6043296 8.24 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 33.0723596 420846.4543 420846.4543 0 132077.7753 48.44157823 8.69 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Utility Class 5 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 31.33664956 391517.5651 391517.5651 0 125146.0437 42.84503555 9.14 San Joaquin 2022 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.301149589 79368.92932 79368.92932 0 25164.271 9.17296451 8.65 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Utility Class 6 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5.922101273 73890.62732 73890.62732 0 23650.50364 8.068457765 9.16 EXHIBIT 1
San Joaquin 2022 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7.184731387 110634.8643 110634.8643 0 28692.94327 12.6401735 8.75 San Joaquin 2030 T6 Utility Class 7 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6.55183963 101043.6339 101043.6339 0 26165.42675 10.94312101 9.23 San Joaquin 2022 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 579.4901376 8873213.878 8873213.878 0 3791381.446 1932.185198 4.59 San Joaquin 2030 T6TS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 474.584898 8426557.293 8426557.293 0 3105026.747 1664.950995 5.06 San Joaquin 2022 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1465.651998 94322580.13 94322580.13 0 10508373.07 15770.2762 5.98 San Joaquin 2030 T7 CAIRP Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1609.245461 101613876.1 101613876.1 0 11537903.74 15064.7061 6.75 San Joaquin 2022 T7 NNOOS Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1314.51908 111518369.3 111518369.3 0 9424786.321 18648.32321 5.98 San Joaquin 2030 T7 NNOOS Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1522.891634 131105894.1 131105894.1 0 10918767.52 18285.23877 7.17 San Joaquin 2022 T7 NOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 547.746265 40512642.66 40512642.66 0 3927209.261 6815.550603 5.94 San Joaquin 2030 T7 NOOS Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 658.5047048 47628442.51 47628442.51 0 4721320.692 6863.504085 6.94 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Other Port Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 29.96782331 1613813.406 1613813.406 0 152965.3599 275.8291853 5.85 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Other Port Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 27.91380238 2026458.222 2026458.222 0 142480.9798 312.2690391 6.49 San Joaquin 2022 T7 POAK Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 130.9212733 4012315.2 4012315.2 0 668264.0737 701.2895659 5.72 San Joaquin 2030 T7 POAK Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 129.8802176 4415506.402 4415506.402 0 662950.1924 705.494381 6.26 San Joaquin 2022 T7 POLA Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 133.7447014 5448794.577 5448794.577 0 682675.7542 952.8299882 5.72 San Joaquin 2030 T7 POLA Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 159.2318432 7377820.897 7377820.897 0 812770.2817 1237.769376 5.96 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 387.8868943 5120839.782 5120839.782 0 620836.2476 1005.029197 5.10 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Public Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 378.7173382 4998369.929 4998369.929 0 606159.8229 912.6515986 5.48 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 116.7544211 2677818.424 2677818.424 0 343145.9137 460.6989897 5.81 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Single Concrete/Transit Mix Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 112.6092183 2344443.502 2344443.502 0 330962.997 374.2047054 6.27 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Single Dump Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 478.1812367 9536301.569 9536301.569 0 1405393.782 1654.245052 5.76 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Single Dump Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 552.6697334 9041303.241 9041303.241 0 1624318.453 1515.628914 5.97 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Single Other Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 984.7457086 17434952.94 17434952.94 0 2894207.028 2999.030833 5.81 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Single Other Class 8Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1393.522707 18377799.27 18377799.27 0 4095618.977 3026.5809 6.07 San Joaquin 2022 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 177.8487212 3596616.494 3596616.494 0 255248.4847 1442.776049 2.49 San Joaquin 2030 T7 SWCV Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 143.1275202 2896116.632 2896116.632 0 205416.617 1074.048992 2.70 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2518.433603 64864115.78 64864115.78 0 11416966.16 10747.18356 6.04 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Tractor Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3532.497356 73001804.65 73001804.65 0 16014082.21 11333.27524 6.44 San Joaquin 2022 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 22.55419755 333131.8573 333131.8573 0 90072.44333 58.51013889 5.69 San Joaquin 2030 T7 Utility Class 8 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 25.09559532 333435.0862 333435.0862 0 100221.7695 55.50666475 6.01 San Joaquin 2022 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2.652755373 18719.50027 18719.50027 0 17355.95975 6.072843609 3.08 San Joaquin 2030 T7IS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 0.44185209 20186.51451 20186.51451 0 2890.868556 4.519734977 4.47 San Joaquin 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 48.76869755 1201484.843 1201484.843 0 63789.4564 255.7319762 4.70 San Joaquin 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 81.19085432 1839458.611 1839458.611 0 106197.6375 209.6089245 8.78 San Joaquin 2030 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 29.25530087 767161.6504 767161.6504 0 38265.93354 163.2503579 4.70 San Joaquin 2030 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 38.98485383 895451.8408 895451.8408 0 50992.18881 97.21612892 9.21 EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Operational) Energy Usage
Unmitigated:

Step 1:

Therefore:

Average Daily VMT:
219,021 Source: CalEEMod Output
Step 2: Given:

Fleet Mix (CalEEMod Output)
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

56.01% 5.39% 17.34% 13.10% 2.13% 0.55% 1.26% 1.65% 0.04% 0.03% 2.12% 0.10% 0.27% And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class - Year 2030 (EMFAC2021 Output) LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV MCY MH OBUS

31.78 26.64 25.94 20.85 40.98 4.42 5.05
Diesel MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class - Year 2030 (EMFAC2021 Output) LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD UBUS SBUS

16.06816187 13.53509423 8.504393618 5.493562034 9.210939077 8.34950855 Therefore:

Weighted Average MPG Factors
Gasoline: 29.0 Diesel: 10.9
Step 3: Therefore:
7,119 daily gallons of gasoline 1,145 daily gallons of diesel or
2,598,340 annual gallons of gasoline 417,861 annual gallons of diesel EXHIBIT 1
Off-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage
Note: For the sake of simplicity, and as a conservative estimation, it was assumed that all off-road vehicles use diesel fuel as an energy source.

Demolition (if applicable), Site preparation and grading off-road mobile vehicle on-site gallons of fuel are calculated below.

Given Factor: 986.6 metric tons CO2 (provided in CalEEMod Output File) Conversion Factor: 2204.6262 pounds per metric ton
Intermediate Result: 2,175,109 pounds CO2
Conversion Factor: 22.38 pounds CO2 per 1 gallon of diesel fuel Source: U.S. EIA, 2016 Final Result: 97,189.87 gallons diesel fuel http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=307&t=11 Mitigated Onsite Scenario Total CO2 (MT/yr) (provided in CalEEMod Output File) Site Preparation - 2022 101.13
Grading - 2022 74.22
Grading - 2023 351.85
Building Construction - 2023 153.90
EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Site Preparation Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
18 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
194
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

7.6 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 60 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 457 Total gallons of gasoline
EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Grading
Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
20 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
216
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

8.5 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 155 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output) Vendor Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 7.3
Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT: Average Vendor Daily VMT:
305 80
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2 Fleet Mix for Workers (CalEEMod Output)

0.5 0.25 0.25 MHD HHD
Assumed Fleet Mix for Vendors 0% 100%
And:

MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 Gasoline: Diesel:

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MHD HHD

28.11 23.45 22.48 8.50 5.49
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker (Gasoline) MPG Factor Weighted Average Vendor (Diesel) MPG Factor

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
162
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

6.3 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 110 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 698 Total gallons of gasoline
EXHIBIT 1
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Architectural Coating Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
113 5% 6
Note: Assumes 5% of Plan Area under construction at given point in time (on average) until buildout.

Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
61 Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.5 0.25 0.25
And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2021) - Year 2022 LDA LDT1 LDT2

28.11 23.45 22.48
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

25.5 Step 3: Therefore:

2.4 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 110 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 263 Total gallons of gasoline
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
140
Appendix B: Noise Report

EXHIBIT 1

Environmental Noise Assessment

Cannery Park Project

City of Stockton, California
May 12, 2022
Project #220114

Prepared for:

De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762

Prepared by:

Saxelby Acoustics LLC

Luke Saxelby, INCE Bd. Cert.

Principal Consultant
Board Certified, Institute of Noise Control Engineering (INCE)

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-2 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

Table of Contents

3.10.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ......................................................................................... 3 KEY TERMS ..................................................................................................................................... 3 FUNDAMENTALS OF ACOUSTICS .......................................................................................................... 4 EFFECTS OF NOISE ON PEOPLE ............................................................................................................ 5 EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE AND VIBRATION ENVIRONMENTS ............................................................... 6 EVALUATION OF FUTURE OPERATIONAL NOISE ON PROPOSED HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES .......... 7 EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION NOISE ON PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ............... 8 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ENVIRONMENT.............................................................................................. 8 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................... 9

3.10.2 REGULATORY SETTING .............................................................................................. 10 FEDERAL ....................................................................................................................................... 10 STATE .......................................................................................................................................... 10 CITY OF STOCKTON ......................................................................................................................... 10 VIBRATION STANDARDS .................................................................................................................. 17

3.10.3 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................. 19 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE ......................................................................................................... 19 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .............................................................................................. 20

List of Figures
Figure 3.10‐1: Noise Measurement Locations ................................................................................... 25 Figure 3.10‐2: Commercial Operational Noise Contours Daytime (Leq) ........................................... 27 Figure 3.10‐3: Commercial Operational Noise Contours Nightime (Leq) .......................................... 29 Figure 3.10‐4: Required Wall Locations for Proposed Single Family Residential Uses ...................... 31

List of Tables
Tabl
e 3.10‐1: Typical Noise Levels ....................................................................................................... 5 Table 3.10‐2: Summary of Existing Background Noise Measurement Data ........................................ 7 Table 3.10‐3: Construction Equipment Noise ...................................................................................... 9 Table 3.10‐4: Vibration Levels for Various Construction Equipment .................................................. 9 Table 3.10‐5: Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure ............................................. 12 Tabl
e 3.10‐6: Part I: Transportation‐Related Noise Standards (Outdoor/Indoor) ............................. 16 Table 3.10‐7: Part II: Land Use‐Related Noise Standards ................................................................ 16 Table 3.10‐8: Effects of Vibration on People and Buildings ............................................................... 18 Table 3.10‐9: Future (2043) Transportation Noise Levels at Proposed Residential Uses .................. 22

Appendic
es
Appendix A: Acoustical Terminology
Appendix B: Continuous Ambient Noise Measurement Results Appendix C: FHWA Barrier Calculations
Appendix D: Interior Noise Reduction Calculations
EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-3

This section provides a general description of the existing noise sources in the project vicinity, a discussion of the regulatory setting, and identifies potential noise impacts associated with the proposed project. Project impacts are evaluated relative to applicable noise level criteria and to the existing ambient noise environment. Mitigation measures have been iden tified for significant noise‐ related impacts.

3.10.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

KEY TERMS
Acoustics The science of sound.

Ambient Noise The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given area consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre‐project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

Attenuation The reduction of noi se.

A‐Weighting A frequency‐response adjustment of a sound level meter that conditions the output signal to approximate human response. A ‐weighted dB values are expressed as dBA.

Decibel or dB Fundamental unit of sound, defined as ten times the logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure squared over th e reference pressure squared.

CNEL Community noise equivalent level. Defined as the 24‐hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 ‐ 10 p.m.) weighted by a factor of three and nighttime hours weighted by a factor of 10 prior to averaging.

Frequency The measure of the rapidity of al terations of a periodic acoustic signal, expressed in cycles per second or Hertz.

Impulsive Sound of short duration, usually less than one second, with an abrupt onset and rapid decay.

Ldn Day/Night Average Sound Level. Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq Equivalent or energy‐averaged sound level.

Lmax The highest root‐mean‐square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

L(n) The sound level exceeded a described percentile over a measurement period.

For instance, an hourly L50 is the sound level exceeded 50 percent of the time during the one hour period.

Loudness A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

Noise Unwanted sound.

SEL Sound exposure levels. A rating, in decibels, of a discrete event, such as an aircraft flyover or train passby, that compresses the total sound energy into a one‐second event.

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-4 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

FUNDAMENTALS OF ACOUSTICS
Acoustics is the science of sound. Sound may be thought of as mechanical energy of a vibrating object transmitted by pressure waves through a medium to human (or animal) ears. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), then they can be heard and are called sound. The num ber of pressure variations per second is called the frequency of sound, and is expressed as cycles per second or Hertz (Hz).

Noise is a subjective reaction to different types of sounds. Noise is typically defined as (airborne) sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected or undesired, and may therefore be classified as a mo re specific group of sounds. Perceptions of sound and noise are highly subjective from person to person.

Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale uses the hearing th reshold (20 micropascals), as a point of reference, defined as 0 dB. Other sound pressures are then compared to this reference pressure, and the logarithm is taken to keep the numbers in a practical range. The decibel scale allows a million‐fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB, and changes in lev
els (dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by A‐wei ghted sound levels. There is a strong correlation between A‐weighted sound levels (expressed as dB) and the way the human ear perceives sound. For this reason, the A‐weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A‐weig hted levels, but are expressed as dB, unless otherwise noted.

The decibel scale is logarithmic, not linear. In other words, two sound levels 10 dB apart differ in acoustic energy by a factor of 10. When the standard logarithmic decibel is A‐weighted, an increase of 10 dB is generally pe
rceived as a doubling in loudness. For example, a 70‐dB sound is half as loud as an 80‐dB sound, and twice as loud as a 60‐dB sound.

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the ambient noise level, which is defined as the all‐encom
passing noise level associated with a given environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq), which corresponds to a steady‐state A weighted sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given time period (usually one hour). The Leq is the foundation of the composite noise descriptor, Ldn, and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

The day/night average level (Ldn) is based upon the average noise level over a 24‐hour day, with a +10 decibel weighing applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours.

The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures as though they were twice as loud as daytime exp osures. Because Ldn represents a 24‐hour average, it tends to disguise short‐term variations in the noise environment. CNEL is similar to Ldn, but includes EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-5

a +5‐dB penalty for evening noise. Table 3.10‐1 lists several examples of the noise levels associated with common situations.

TABLE 3.10‐1: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS
COMMON OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES NOISE LEVEL (DB) COMMON INDOOR ACTIVITIES --110-- Rock Band
Jet Fly-over at 300 m (1,000 ft) --100--
Gas Lawn Mower at 1 m (3 ft) --90--
Diesel Truck at 15 m (50 ft),
at 80 km/hr (50 mph) --80-- Food Blender at 1 m (3 ft)
Garbage Disposal at 1 m (3 ft)
Noisy Urban Area, Daytime
Gas Lawn Mower, 30 m (100 ft) --70-- Vacuum Cleaner at 3 m (10 ft) Commercial Area
Heavy Traffic at 90 m (300 ft) --60-- Normal Speech at 1 m (3 ft) Quiet Urban Daytime --50-- Large Business Office
Dishwasher in Next Room
Quiet Urban Nighttime --40-- Theater, Large Conference Room (Background)
Quiet Suburban Nighttime --30-- Library
Quiet Rural Nighttime --20-- Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall (Background)
--10-- Broadcast/Recording Studio
Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing --0-- Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing SOURCE: CALTRANS, TECHNICAL NOISE SUPPLEMENT, TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS PROTOCOL. SEPTEMBER 2013.

EFFECTS OF NOISE ON PEOPLE
The effects of noise on people can be placed in three categories:
 Subjective effects of annoyance, nuisance, and dissatisfaction;  Interference with activities such as speech, sleep, and learning; and  Physiological effects such as hearing loss or sudden startling.

Environmental noise typically produces effects in the first two categories. Workers in industr ial plants can experience noise in the last category. There is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise or the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. A wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance exists and different tolerances to noise tend to develop based on an individual’s past expe riences with noise.

Thus, an important way of predicting a human reaction to a new noise environment is the way it compares to the existing environment to which one has adapted: the so‐called ambient noise level.

In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing amb ient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will be judged by those hearing it. With regard to increases in A‐weighted noise level, the following relationships occur:
 Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a 1 dB change cannot be perceived;  Outside of the laboratory, a 3‐dB change is cons idered a just‐perceivable difference;  A change in level of at least 5‐dB is required before any noticeable change in human response would be expected; and
EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-6 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

 A 10‐dB change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness, and can cause an adverse response.

Stationary point sources of noise – including stationary mobile sources such as idling vehicles – attenuate (lessen) at a rate of approximately 6 dB per doubling of distance from the source, depending on en
vironmental conditions (i.e. atmospheric conditions and either vegetative or manufactured noise barriers, etc.). Widely distributed noises, such as a large industrial facility spread over many acres, or a street with moving vehicles, would typically attenuate at a lower rate.

EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE AND VIBRATION ENVIRONMENTS
Existing and Surrounding Land Uses
North: Eight Mile Road and existing single family residential uses border the northern boundary.

East: Highway 99 and the Highway 99 Frontage road border the eastern boundary.

South: Existing single‐family residences border the southern boundary of the overall project site.

West: Existing commercial uses and future single family residential uses border the wes tern boundary of the overall project site.

Existing Ambient Noise Levels
To quantify the existing ambient noise environment in the Project Vicinity, a continuous (24‐hour) noise level measurement was conducted on the project site on February 9th, 2022. The noise measurement location is shown on Figure 3.10‐1. The noise level measurement survey results are provided in Table 3.10‐2. Appendix B of Appendix F shows the complete results of the noise monitoring survey.

The sound level meters were programmed to collect hourly noise level intervals at each site during th
e survey. The maximum value (Lmax) represents the highest noise level measured during an interval. The average value (Leq) represents the energy average of all of the noise measured during an interval. The median value (L50) represents the sound level exceeded 50 percent of the time during an interval.

A Larson Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model 820 precision integrating sound level meter was used for the ambient noise level measurement survey. The meter was calibrated before and after use with an LDL Model CAL200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accura cy of the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4).

EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-7

TABLE 3.10‐2: SUMMARY OF EXISTING BACKGROUND NOISE MEASUREMENT DATA SITE LOCATION DATE/TIME LDN
AVERAGE MEASURED HOURLY NOISE LEVELS, DB
DAYTIME (7AM‐10PM) NIGHTTIME (10PM‐7AM)
LEQ L50 LMAX LEQ L50 LMAX
Continuous (24‐hour) Noise Level Measurements
LT‐1
Eastern side of
project site, 135
feet to Hwy 99
Centerline
2/9/2022 77 73 72 87 70 68 83
SOURCE: SAXELBY ACOUSTICS, 2022.

EVALUATION OF FUTURE OPERATIONAL NOISE ON PROPOSED HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES Operational Noise Levels
The proposed project includes the construction of high‐density residential housing on 12.34 acres surrounded by 19.76 acres of new commercial development. The commercial development will be distributed over 15 lots. The primary noise generating components of the new commercial development would be parking lot circulation, HVAC units, a gas station car wash, and drive‐thru speaker boxes. The following is a list of assumptions used for the noise modeling. The data used is based upon a combination of manufacturer’s provided data and Saxelby Acoustics data from similar operations.

On‐Site Circulation: The commercial component of the project is projected to generate 21,863 daily trip
s with 2,420 trips in the morning peak hour (KD Anderson & Associates). Saxelby Acoustics assumed that 2% of these trips could be trucks. Parking lot movements are predicted to generate a sound exposure level (SEL) of 71 dBA SEL at 50 feet for cars and 85 dBA SEL at 50 feet for tru cks. Nighttime traffic outside of the AM or PM peak hour is estimated to be approximately 1/4 of daytime trips during nighttime hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). Saxelby Acoustics data.

Rooftop HVAC Units: Each commercial building was assumed to have three ten‐ton packaged units operating co ntinuously during the daytime, and 50% of the time at night. Manufacturer’s data.

Rooftop Condensing Unit: Each commercial building was assumed to have one ten‐ton air‐cooled chiller package operating continuously during the daytime, and 50% of the time at night. Manufacturer’s data.

Car Wash Blowers: 64‐65 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet during the peak hour. Typical manufacturer’s data.

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-8 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

Vacuum Station: One canister type vacuum station utilized at the gas station car wash at 64 dBA at 25 feet. Running continuously during the peak hour of usage.

Manufacturer’s data.

Drive‐Through Speakers: One speaker per drive‐through restaurant at 65 dBA each at 20 feet.

Running continuously during the peak hour of usage , day and night.

Saxelby Acoustics data.

Saxelby Acoustics used the SoundPLAN noise prediction model. Inputs to the model included sound power levels for the proposed amenities, existing and proposed buildings, terrain type, and locations of sensitive receptors. These predictions are made in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 96 13‐2:1996 (Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors). ISO 9613 is the most commonly used method for calculating exterior noise propagation. Figure 3.10‐2 shows the noise level contours resulting from operation of the project.

EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION NOISE ON PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES Traffic Noise Levels
Highway 99
Future (2043) traffic noise levels are predicted to be 77 dB Ldn at a distance of 160 feet from the centerline of Highway 99, assuming no shielding from intervening buildings or sound walls. The proposed residential uses are located approximately 160 feet from the centerline Highway 99.

Therefore, maximum exterior noise levels of 77 dB Ldn are predicted for these uses.

CONSTRUCTION NOISE ENVIRONMENT
During the construction of the proposed project, including roads, water, and sewer lines and related infrastructure, noise from construction activities would add to the noise environment in the project vicinity. As indicated in Table 3.10‐3, activities involved in construction would generate maximum noise levels ranging from 76 to 90 dB at a distance of 50 f eet.

EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-9

TABLE 3.10‐3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE
TYPE OF EQUIPMENT MAXIMUM LEVEL, DB
25 FEET 50 FEET
Backhoe 84 78
Compactor 89 83
Compressor (air) 84 78
Concrete Saw 96 90
Dozer 88 82
Dump Truck 82 76
Excavator 87 81
Generator 87 81
Jackhammer 94 89
Pneumatic Tools 91 85
SOURCE: ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODEL USER’S GUIDE. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. FHWA‐HEP‐05‐ 054. JANUARY 2006.

CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT
The primary vibration‐generating activities associated with the proposed project would happen during construction when activities such as grading, utilities placement, and road construction occur. Table 3.10‐4 shows the typical vibration levels produced by construction placement.

TABLE 3.10‐4: VIBRATION LEVELS FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TYPE OF EQUIPMENT
PEAK PARTICLE VELOCITY @ 25 FEET
(INCHES/SECOND)
PEAK PARTICLE VELOCITY @ 100 FEET
(INCHES/SECOND)
Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.011
Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.010
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.000
Auger/drill Rigs 0.089 0.011
Jackhammer 0.035 0.004
Vibratory Hammer 0.070 0.009
Vibratory Compactor/roller 0.210 0.026
SOURCE: FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, TRANSIT NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES, MAY 2006

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-10 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

3.10.2 REGULATORY SETTING

FEDERAL
There are no federal regulations related to noise that apply to the proposed project.

STATE
California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Appendix G, indicate that a significant noise impact may occur if a project exposes persons to noise or vibration levels in excess of local general plans or noise ordinance standards, or cause a substantial permanent or temporary increase in ambient noise levels. CEQA standards are discussed mo re below under the Thresholds of Significance section.

California State Building Codes
The State Building Code, Title 24, Part 2 of the State of California Code of Regulations establishes uniform minimum noise insulation performance standards to protect persons within new buildings which house people, including hotels, motels, dormitories, apartment houses and dwellings other than single‐family dwellings. Title 24 mandates that interior noise levels attributable to ex terior sources shall not exceed 45 dB Ldn or CNEL in any habitable room.

Title 24 also mandates that for structures containing noise‐sensitive uses to be located where the Ldn or CNEL exceeds 60 dB, an acoustical analysis must be prepared to identify mechanisms for limiting exterior noise to the prescribed allowable interior levels. If the interior allowable noise levels are met by requiring that windows be kept closed, the design for the structure must also specify a ventilation or air conditioning system to prov ide a habitable interior environment

CITY OF STOCKTON
City of Stockton General Plan
POLICY SAF-2.5
Protect the community from health hazards and annoyance associated with excessive noise levels.

A. Prohibit new commercial, industrial, or other noise‐generating land uses adjacent to existing sensitive noise receptors such as residential uses, schools, health care facilities, libraries, and churches if noise levels are expected to exceed 70 dBA Community Noise Equiva lent (CNEL) (decibels on A‐weighted scale CNEL) when measured at the property line of the noise sensitive land use.

B. Require projects that would locate noise sensitive land uses where the projected ambient noise level is greater than the "normally acceptable" noise level indicated on Table 3.10‐5 to prov
ide an acoustical analysis that shall:

EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-11

a. Be the responsibility of the applicant;
b. Be prepared by a qualified person experienced in the fields of environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics;
c. Include representative noise level measurements with sufficient sampling periods and locations to adequately describe local conditions;
d. Estimate existing and projected (20‐year) noise levels in terms of Ldn/ CNEL and compare the levels to the adopted noise policies and actions in this General Plan; e. Recommend appropriate mitigation to achieve compatibility with the adopted noise policies and standards;
f. Where the noise source in question consists of intermittent single events, address the effects of maximum noise levels in sleep ing rooms in terms of possible sleep disturbance;
g. Estimate noise exposure after the prescribed mitigation measures have been implemented;
h. If the project does not comply with the adopted standards and policies of this General Plan, provide acoustical information for a statement of overriding considerations for the project; and
i. Descr
ibe a post‐project assessment program, which could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures.

C. Require noise produced by commercial uses to not exceed 75 dB Ldn/CNEL at the nearest property line.

D. Grant exceptions to the noise standards for commercial and industrial uses on ly if a recorded noise easement is conveyed by the affected property owners.

E. Require all new habitable structures to be set back from railroad tracks to protect residents from noise, vibration, and safety impacts.

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-12 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

TABLE 3.10‐5: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE

City of Stockton Development Code
CHAPTER 16.60 - NOISE STANDARDS.

16.60.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to:

A. Establish standards to protect the health, safety, and welfare of those living and working in the City;
B. Implement goals and policies of the General Plan Noise Element; C. Facilitate compliance with the State Noise Insulation Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 24) and Chapter 35 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC); D. Provide community noise control regulations and standards which are consistent with, or exceed, the guidelines of the State Office of Noise Control and the standards adopted by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), California Department of Transportation (CalTrans), or other government or regulat ory agencies; and EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-13

E. Consolidate and/or reference all applicable City noise regulations. (Prior code § 16‐340.010)

16.60.020 Activities exempt from noise regulations:

The following activities shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter.

A. Emergency Exemption. The emission of sound for the purpose of alerting persons to the existence of an emergency, or the emission of sound in the performance of emergency work. Does not include permanently installed emergency generators.

B. Warning Device. Warning devices necessary for the protection of public safety, (e.g., police, fire and ambulance sirens, properly operating home and car burglar alarms, and train horns).

C. Outdoor Play/School Ground Activities. Activities co nducted on parks and playgrounds and school grounds, between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., except for additional hours that may be granted by the City Manager. Otherwise, outdoor activities shall meet standards in Table 3‐

7. D. Railroad Activities. The operation of locomotives, rail cars, and facilities by a railroad that is regulated by th
e State Public Utilities Commission.

E. State or Federal Pre‐Exempted Activities. Any activity, to the extent the regulation of it has been preempted by State or Federal law.

F. Public Health and Safety Activities. All transportation, flood control, and utility company maintenance and construction opera tions at any time on public rights‐of‐way, and those situations that may occur on private property deemed necessary to serve the best interest of the public and to protect the public’s health and well‐being, including, debris and limb removal, removal of damaged poles and vehicles, removal of downed wires, repairin g traffic signals, repair of water hydrants and mains, gas lines, oil lines, and sewers, restoring electrical service, street sweeping, unplugging sewers, vacuuming catch basins, etc. The regular testing of motorized equipment and pumps shall not be exempt.

G. Maintenance of Residential Real Property. Noise sources associated with the minor ma
intenance of residential real property, provided the activities take place between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (Prior code § 16‐340.020)

16.60.030 Activities deemed violations of this chapter:

The following acts are a violation of this chapter and are therefore prohibited.

A. Construction Noise: Operating or causing the oper ation of tools or equipment on private property used in alteration, construction, demolition, drilling, or repair work between the EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-14 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., so that the sound creates a noise disturbance across a residential property line, except for emergency work of public service utilities.

B. Loading and Unloading Operations. Loading, unloading, opening, closing or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or similar objects on privat e property between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner to cause a noise disturbance.

C. Public Nuisance Noise. Public nuisance noise is noise that is generally not associated with a particular land use but creates a nuisance situation by reason of its being disturbing, excessiv
e, or offensive. Examples would include excessively loud noise from alarms, animals, horns, musical instruments, stereos, tape players, televisions, vehicle or motorboat repairs and testing, and similar noise as required by Chapter 8.20 and Sections 9.40.040 and

9.40.050 of the Municipal Code.

D. Stationary Nonemergency Signaling Devices. Sounding or allowing the sounding of an electron
ically amplified signal from a stationary bell, chime, siren, whistle, or similar device intended primarily for nonemergency purposes, from private property for more than 10 consecutive seconds in any hourly period as required by Section 8.20.030(B) of the Municipal Code.

E. Refuse Collection Vehicles.

F. Operating or allowing the oper ation of the compacting mechanism of any motor vehicle that compacts refuse and that creates, during the compacting cycle, a sound level in excess of 85 dBA when measured at 50 feet from any point of the vehicle.

G. Collecting refuse or operating or allowing the operation of the compacting mec hanism of any motor vehicle that compacts refuse in a residential zoning district between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m. the following day.

H. Sweepers and Associated Equipment. Operating or allowing the operation of sweepers or associated sweeping equipment (e.g., blowers) on private property between the hours of 10:00 p.m
. and 7:00 a.m. the following day in, or adjacent to, a residential zoning district.

I. Vehicle or Motorboat Repairs and Testing. Modifying, rebuilding, repairing, or testing any motor vehicle, motorcycle, or motorboat in a manner as to cause a noise disturbance across the property line of a noise‐sensitive use great er than the noise level standards in Table 3‐ 7, below. (Prior code § 16‐340.030)

16.60.040 Standards.

EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-15

The following provisions shall apply to all uses and properties, as described below, and shall establish the City’s standards concerning acceptable noise levels for both noise‐sensitive land uses and for noise‐generating land uses and transportation‐related sources:

A. Standards For Proposed Noise‐Sensitive Land Uses on Noise‐Impacted Sites (Except Infill Areas). Excluding
proposed noise‐sensitive land uses on infill sites, which shall comply with subsection C of this section:

1. Existing Transportation‐Related Noise Sources. Proposed noise sensitive land uses that will be impacted by existing or projected transportation noise sources shall be required to mitigate the noise levels from th ese transportation noise sources so that the resulting noise levels on the proposed noise‐sensitive land use(s) do not exceed the standards in Table 3‐7, Part I.

2. Existing Land Use‐Related Noise Sources. Proposed noise sensitive land uses that will be impacted by existing land use‐related noise sou rces shall be required to mitigate the noise levels from those noise sources so that the resulting noise levels on the proposed noise‐ sensitive land use(s) do not exceed the standards in Table 3‐7, Part II.

B. Standards for Proposed Noise‐Generating Land Uses and Transportation‐Related Sources.

Excluding no
ise‐generating projects on infill sites, which shall comply with subsection C of this section, the following shall apply:

1. Transportation‐Related Noise Sources (Except Infill Sites). Transportation‐related projects that include the development of new transportation facilities or the expansion of existing transportation facilities shall be required to mitigate their nois e levels so that the resulting noise:
a. Does not adversely impact noise‐sensitive land uses; and b. Does not exceed the standards in Table 3‐7, Part I.

Noise levels shall be measured at the property line of the nearest site, which is occupied by, and/or zoned or designated to allo w the development of, noise‐sensitive land uses.

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-16 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

TABLE 3.10‐6: PART I: TRANSPORTATION ‐RELATED NOISE STANDARDS (OUTDOOR/INDOOR) NOISE LEVEL DESCRIPTOR, DB
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NOISE EXPOSURE (LDN DB)
OUTDOOR ACTIVITY AREAS INDOOR SPACES
Residential (all types) 65 45
Child care ‐‐ 45
Educational Facilities ‐‐ 45
Libraries and museums ‐‐ 45
Live‐work facilities 65 45
Lodging 65 45
Medical services ‐‐ 45
Multi‐use (with residential) 65 45

TABLE 3.10‐7: PART II: LAND USE‐RELATED NOISE STANDARDS NOISE LEVEL DESCRIPTOR, DB DAYTIME
(7 A.M. TO 10 P.M.)

NIGHTTIME
(10 P.M. TO 7 A.M.)
Hourly Leq 55 45
Maximum Sound Level Lmax 75 65
NOTES:
(1) THE NOISE STANDARD MUST BE APPLIED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE RECEIVING LAND USE. WHEN DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES, THE STANDARDS MUST BE APPLIED ON THE RECEIVING SIDE OF NOISE BARRIERS OR OTHER PROPERTY LINE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES.
(2) EACH OF THE NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS SPECIFIED MUST BE DECREASED BY 5 FOR IMPULSE NOISE, SIMPLE TONE NOISE, OR NOISE CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SPEECH OR MUSIC.

SOURCE: CITY OF STOCKTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.60.040, STANDARDS.

2. Commercial, Industrial, and Other Land Use‐Related Noise Sources (Except Infill Sites). a. New and Expanded Noise Sources. Land use‐related projects that will create new noise sources or expand existing noise sources shall be required to mitigate their noise levels so that the resulting noise:
i. Does not adversely impact noise‐sensi tive land uses; and EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-17

ii. Does not exceed the standards specified in Table 3‐7, Part II.

Noise levels shall be measured at the property line of the nearest site which is occupied by, zoned for, and/or designated on the City’s General Plan Diagram to allow the development of, noise‐sensitive land uses.
b. Maximum Sound Leve l.
i. Commercial.
a) The maximum sound level (Lmax) produced by commercial land uses or by other permitted noise‐generating activities on any retail commercial zoning district (i.e., CO, CN, CG, CD, CL, or CA districts) shall not exceed 75 dB; and b) The hourly equivalent sound level (Leq) from these land uses shall no t exceed 65 dB during daytime or nighttime hours as measured at the property line of any other adjoining retail commercial zoning district (CO, CN, CG, CD, CL, or CA districts).
ii. Industrial.
a) The maximum sound level (Lmax) produced by industrial land uses or by other perm
itted noise‐generating activities on any industrial (IL, IG, or PT) or public facilities (PF) zoning district shall not exceed 80 dB; and b) The hourly equivalent sound level (Leq) from these land uses shall not exceed 70 dB during daytime or nighttime hours as measured at the property line of any other adj
oining IL, IG, PT, or PF district.
c) Where industrial or public facilities uses abut a retail commercial use or zone, the maximum noise levels shall not exceed the above‐listed standards for commercial uses and zones (i.e., Lmax = 75 dB and Leq = 65 dB). c. Adjacent to Othe
r Uses. If commercial, industrial, or public facilities land uses are adjacent to any noise‐sensitive land uses or vacant residential (RE, RL, RM, or RH) or open space (OS) zoning districts, these uses shall comply with the performance standards contained in Table 3‐7, Part II.

VIBRATION STANDARDS
Vibration is like noise in that it involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. While vibration is related to noise, it differs in that in that noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface.

As with noise
, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s perception to the EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-18 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

vibration will depend on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating.

Vibration can be measured in terms of acceleration, velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration measures in terms of peak particle velo cities in inches per second. Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration levels defined in terms of peak particle velocities.

The City does not have specific policies pertaining to vibration levels. However, vibration levels associated with construction activities are addressed as potential noi se impacts associated with project implementation.

Human and structural response to different vibration levels is influenced by several factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events. Table 3.10‐8 indicates that the threshold for damage to structures ranges from 0.2 to 0.6 peak particl e velocity in inches per second (in/sec p.p.v). A threshold of 0.20 in/sec p.p.v. is considered to be a reasonable threshold for short‐term construction projects.

TABLE 3.10‐8: EFFECTS OF VIBRATION ON PEOPLE AND BUILDINGS PEAK PARTICLE VELOCITY
HUMAN REACTION EFFECT ON BUILDINGS
MM/SEC. IN./SEC.

0.15‐0.30 0.006‐0.019 Threshold of perception; possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause damage of any
type

2.0 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of the vibration to
which ruins and ancient monuments should
be subjected

2.5 0.10 Level at which continuous vibrations
begin to annoy people
Virtually no risk of “architectural” damage to
normal buildings

5.0 0.20
Vibrations annoying to people in
buildings (this agrees with the levels
established for people standing on
bridges and subjected to relative
short periods of vibrations)
Threshold at which there is a risk of
“architectural” damage to normal dwelling ‐
houses with plastered walls and ceilings.

Special types of finish such as lining of walls,
flexib
le ceiling treatment, etc., would
minimize “architectural” damage
10‐15 0.4‐0.6
Vibrations considered unpleasant by
people subjected to continuous
vibrations and unacceptable to some
people walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than normally
expected from traffic, but would cause
“architectural” damage and possibly minor
structural damage.

SOURCE: CALTRANS. TRANSPORTATION RELATED EARTHBORN VIBRATIONS. TAV‐02‐01‐R9601 FEBRUARY 20, 2002.

EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-19

3.10.3 I MPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Consistent with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project will have a significant impact related to noise if it will result in:

Would the project:
a. Generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general pla n or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, woul
d the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Determination of a Significant Increase in Noise Levels Temporary Construction Noise Impacts
With temporary noise impacts (construction), identification of “substantial increases” depends upon the duration of the impact, the temporal daily nature of the impact, and the absolute change in decibel levels. Per the City of Stockton noise ordinance, construction activities operating between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. which create a noise disturbance at th e property boundary of a residence are prohibited and would be considered a significant impact.

Operational Impacts
The noise standards applicable to the project include the relevant portions of the City of Stockton General Plan and Development Code described in the Regulatory Framework Section above (Section

3.10.2), and
the following standards. Generally, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas or expose people to severe noise levels. In practice, more specific professional standards have been developed. These standards state that a noise impact may be co nsidered significant if it would generate noise that would conflict with local project criteria or ordinances, or substantially increase noise levels at noise sensitive land uses. The potential increase in traffic noise from the project is a factor in determining significance. Research into the human perception of changes in sound leve l indicates the following:

A 3‐dB change is barely perceptible,
A 5‐dB change is clearly perceptible, and
A 10‐dB change is perceived as being twice or half as loud.

Another means of determining a potential noise impact is Table 5‐1 of the Stockton General Plan 2040
Safety Element. Table 5‐1 provides specific guidance for assessing increases in ambient noise EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-20 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

as follows: If existing noise standards are currently exceeded, a proposed project shall not incrementally increase noise levels by more than 3 dBA. It should be noted that Caltrans assumes a 12 dBA increase is significant. Therefore, use of the 3 dBA test is considered to be conservative relative to the expected reactio n from persons affected by the noise increase.

IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
IMPACT 1: WOULD THE PROJECT GENERATE A SUBSTANTIAL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT INCREASE IN AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT IN EXCESS OF STANDARDS ESTABLISHED IN THE LOCAL GENERAL PLAN OR NOISE ORDINANCE, OR APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF OTHER AGENCIES?

TRAFFIC NOISE INCREASES AT EXISTING SENSITIVE RECEPTORS

The proposed project is predicted to generate a total of 27,060 daily trips. This is less than the approved land uses which would generate 45,688 trips. Therefore, the proposed project traffic noise increases will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. This would be a less than significant impact.

CONSTRUCTION NOISE
During the construction phases of the project, noise from construction activities would add to the noise environment in the immediate project vicinity. As indicated in Table 3.10‐3, activities involved in construction would generate maximum noise levels ranging from 76 to 90 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet. Construction activities would also be temporary in nature and are anticipated to occur during normal daytime working hours.

Noise would also be generated during the construction phase by increased truck traffic on area roadways. A project‐generated noise source would be truck traffic associated with transport of heav
y materials and equipment to and from the construction site. This noise increase would be of short duration, and would occur during daytime hours.

Noise from localized point sources (such as construction sites) typically decreases by approximately 6 dBA with each doubling of distance from source to receptor. Given this nois e attenuation rate and assuming no noise shielding from either natural or human‐made features (e.g., trees, buildings, fences), outdoor receptors within approximately 1,600 feet of construction sites could experience maximum instantaneous noise levels of greater than 60 dBA when on‐site construction‐related noise levels exceed approximately 90 dBA at the bound ary of the construction site. As previously discussed, nearby noise‐sensitive receptors consist predominantly of residential dwellings located near the western and northern boundaries of the project site.

The City of Stockton Noise Ordinance places limitations on the acceptable hours of construction.

During development of the proposed project, construction activitie s occurring during the more EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-21

noise‐sensitive late evening and nighttime hours (i.e., 10 PM to 7 AM) are prohibited. Additionally, there are several residential uses directly adjacent the project site which may be subject to construction noise. As a result, noise‐generating construction activities would be considered to have a potentially significant short‐term impact. Implementation of Mitiga tion Measure 3.10‐1 will ensure that these potential impacts are reduced to a less‐than‐significant level.

EXTERIOR NON-TRANSPORTATION NOISE AT PROPOSED HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES The proposed Project includes the development of 15 commercial lots on land with an existing commercial designation adjacent to a future high‐density residential use immediately to the south and east of the commercial use. The high density residential site has not been site planned, however, the intent is to incorporate the commercial and high density uses into an integrated and compatible plan with the commercial use, rather than building two isolated land uses.

As shown in Figures 3.10‐2 and 3.10‐3, the proposed commercial uses are predicted to generate noise levels of up to 57 dBA at the future residential prope rty line during daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) hours and up to 48 dBA during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. This exceeds the City of Stockton daytime noise level standard of 55 dBA Leq and nighttime noise level standard of 45 dBA Leq.

While the high density residential site has not been site planned, the area where the noise threshold is exceeded at the parcel line is anticipated to be used for landscape buffers and parking space. The high density residential buildings are anticipated to be designed with a setback from the property line and comm
ercial uses such that they would be built in an area that is within the City of Stockton noise level standards shown in Table NOISE‐1. In order to ensure compliance with the City’s daytime and nighttime noise standards, an evaluation of the high density residential site is necessary after it is de
signed for architectural design review. The City would need to review the site plan during that process to ensure that there are no buildings placed along the property line where the exceedance occurs. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.10‐2 will ensure that these potential impacts are reduced to a less‐than‐s ignificant level.

EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE AT PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES Table 3.10‐9 shows the predicted traffic noise levels at the proposed residential uses adjacent to Highway 99. Based upon Table 3.10‐9, exterior noise levels would exceed the City’s 60 dBA Ldn normally acceptable exterior noise standard, as well as the City 65 dBA Ldn maximum acceptable noise exposure. The 60 dBA Ldn noise contours for Highway 99 were found to extend to an approximate distance of 2,037 feet from the roadway centerline. This would encroach into the outdoor activity areas of proposed residences. Therefore, use of a physical barrier would be the only feasible method to reduce exterior noise levels to within the City’s allowable exter ior noise standard range.

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-22 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

TABLE 3.10‐9: FUTURE (2043) TRANSPORTATION NOISE LEVELS AT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL USES

SEGMENT

APPROXIMATE

RESIDENTIAL
SETBACK, FEET1
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS, DB LDN2
NO

BARRIER
10’

BARRIER
11’

BARRIER
12’

BARRIER
13’

BARRIER
14’

BARRIER
Highway 99 135 78 67 66 65 64 63
NOTES:
1 SETBACK DISTANCES ARE MEASURED IN FEET FROM THE CENTERLINES OF THE ROADWAYS TO THE CENTER OF RESIDENTIAL BACKYARDS.
2 THE MODELED NOISE BARRIERS ASSUME FLAT SITE CONDITIONS WHERE ROADWAY ELEVATIONS, BASE OF WALL ELEVATIONS, AND BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATELY EQUIVALENT. SOUND BARRIER HEIGHT MAY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE USE A WALL AND EARTHEN BERM TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL HEIGHT (E.G. A 6‐FOOT WALL ON 2‐FOOT BERM IS EQUIVALENT TO AN 8‐FOOT TALL BARRIER).

SOURCE: SAXELBY ACOUSTICS. 2022.

The modeled noise barriers assume flat site conditions where roadway elevations, base of wall elevations, and building pad elevations are approximately equivalent. Appendix C of Appendix F shows the full barrier height calculations.

Based upon the data in Table 3.10‐9, a 12‐foot‐tall barrier may be used to achieve compliance with the
City’s exterior maximum noise level standard of 65 dBA Ldn for outdoor activity areas of residential uses. The proposed wall location is shown on Figure 3.10‐4. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.10‐3 will ensure that these potential impacts are reduced to a less‐than‐significant level.

INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS AT PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES Modern construction typically provides a 25‐dB exterior‐to‐interior noise level reduction with windows closed. Therefore, sensitive receptors exposed to exterior noise of 70 dB Ldn, or less, will typically comply with the City of Stockton 45 dB Ldn interior noise level standard. Additional noise reduction measures, such as acoustically‐rated windows, are generally required for exterior noise levels exceeding 70 dB Ldn.

It should be noted that noise barriers do not typically reduce exterior noise levels at second floor locations. The proposed residential uses are predicted to be exposed to unmitigated first‐floor exterior transportation noise levels up 77 dBA Ldn. Mitigated first‐floor noise levels of 63‐65 dBA Ldn are expected after construction of sound barriers. The second‐floor locations are not expected to receive adequate shielding from the proposed sound walls and may be exposed to noise levels 2‐3 dB higher than ground floor receivers. Therefore, noise levels of 80 dB Ldn are expected at the second‐floor facades of the proposed residences.

Based upon a 25‐dB exterior‐to‐interior noise level reduction, interior noise levels are predicted to be up to 55 dB Ldn at second floors and 40 dBA Ldn at first floors. Accordingly, predicted interior noise levels along the first row of residential uses along Highway 99 are predicted to exceed the City’s 45 dB Ldn interior noise level standard at second floor locations.

EXHIBIT 1
NOISE 3.10

Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project 3.10-23

Appendix D (See Appendix F of this EIR) shows an estimate of the interior noise control measures required to meet the City’s interior noise level standards. Implementation of Mitigation Measure

3.10‐4 will ensure that these potential impacts are reduced to a less‐than‐significant level.

MITIGATION MEASURE(S)
Mitigation Measure 3.10‐1: The City shall establish the following as conditions of approval for any permit that results in the use of construction equipment:
 Construction shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.  All construction equipment powered by internal combustion engines shall be properly muffled and maintained.
 Quiet constr
uction equipment, particularly air compressors, are to be selected whenever possible.
 All stationery noise‐generating construction equipment such as generators or air compressors are to be located as far as is practical from existing residences. In addition, the project contractor shall place such stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is dir
ected away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site.  Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is prohibited.  The construction contractor shall, to the maximum extent practical, locate on‐site equipment staging areas to maximize the distance between construction‐related noise sources and noise‐sensitive receptors nearest the pr oject site during all project construction.

Timing/Implementation: Implemented prior to approval of grading and/or building permits Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Stockton Community Development Services Department Mitigation Measure 3.10‐2: The high density residential development shall be designed with landscaping and parking space, or another non‐sensitive use, in the area along the prope rty line closest to the commercial site. There shall be no noise sensitive outdoor activity areas, or residential buildings placed within the noise contour that exceeds the City’s 55 dBA day and night noise standard for land uses. The intent is to ensure that outdoor areas in the high density res idential uses are not adversely affected by noise in the commercial areas. Alternatively, once a specific site plan has been developed, the developer of the future high‐density parcel may submit a noise study prepared by a qualified acoustic engineer documenting a site plan design or required noise control measures to meet th
e noise standards of the City of Stockton.

Mitigation Measure 3.10‐3: A 12‐foot‐tall barrier shall be constructed along Highway 99 and the Highway 99 Frontage Road, adjacent to proposed residential uses, in order to achieve the City’s exterior noise standards. Noise barrier walls shall be constructed of concre te panels, concrete masonry units, earthen berms, or any combination of these materials that achieve the required total height. Wood is not recommended due to eventual warping and degradation of acoustical EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-24 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

performance. These requirements shall be included in the improvements plans prior to their approval by the City’s Public Works Department. Figure 3.10‐4 shows the recommended sound wall locations.

Mitigation Measure 3.10‐4: For the first rows of lots adjacent to the Highway 99 and Highway 99 Frontage Road right of way, second floor ex terior facades with a view of Highway 99 would need the following noise control measures:
o Windows shall have a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 40. o Interior gypsum at exterior walls shall be 5/8” hung on resilient channels; o Ceiling gypsum shall be 5/8”;
o Exterior finish shall be stucco with sheathing, fiber cement lap siding with sheathing, or system with equivalent weight per square foot; o Mechanical ventilation shall be installed in all residential uses to allow residents to keep doors and windows closed, as desired for acoustical isolation. o As an alternative to the above‐listed interior noise control measures, the applicant may provide a detailed analysis of interior noise control measures once building plans become available. The analysis should be prepared by a qualified noise control engineer and shall outline the specific measures required to meet the City of Stockton 45 dB Ldn interior noise level standard.

IMPACT 2: WOULD THE PROJECT GENERATE EXCESSIVE GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION OR GROUNDBORNE NOISE LEVELS?

Construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building structural damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of perception.

Building damage can take the form of cosmetic or structural.

The Table 3.10‐8 data indicate that construction vibration levels anticipated for the project are less than the 0.2 in/ sec threshold at distances of 26 feet. Sensitive receptors which could be impacted by construction related vibrations, especially vibratory compactors/rollers, are located approximately 26 feet, or further, from typical construction activities. At these distances construction vibrations are not predicted to exceed acceptable levels. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary in nature and would likely occur during normal daytime working hours. This is a less‐than‐significant impact and no mitigation is required.

IMPACT 3: FOR A PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A PRIVATE AIRSTRIP OR AN AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN OR, WHERE SUCH A PLAN HAS NOT BEEN ADOPTED, WITHIN TWO MILES OF A PUBLIC AIRPORT OR PUBLIC USE AIRPORT, WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS?
There are no airports within two miles of the project vicinity. Therefore, this impact is not applicable to the proposed project.

EXHIBIT 1
Cannery Park
City of Stockton, California
Figure 3.10-1
Noise Measurement Sites
Eight Mile Rd.

PFC Jesse
Mizener
St.

EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-26 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
Cannery Park
City of Stockton, California
Figure 3.10-2
Daytime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Project Noise Contours (dBA Leq)
52 dBA
57 dBA
53 dBA
EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-28 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
45 dBA
Cannery Park
City of Stockton, California
Figure 3.10-3
Nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Project Noise Contours (dBA Leq)
47 dBA
50 dBA
44 dBA
48 dBA
43 dBA
EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-30 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
Cannery Park
City of Stockton, California
Figure 3.10-4
Recommended Sound Wall Locations –
Sing
le Family Residential Lots
Recomm
ended 12-Foot Barrier
Legend
EXHIBIT 1

3.10 NOISE

3.10-32 Environmental Impact Report – Cannery Park Project

This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1

Appendix A: Acoustical Terminology

Acoustics The science of sound.

Ambient Noise The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre‐project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

ASTC A p p a r e n t S o u n d T r a n s m i s s i o n C l a s s . S i m i l a r t o S T C b u t i n c l u d e s s o u n d f r o m f l a n k i n g p a t h s a n d c o r r e c t f o r r o o m reverberation. A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Attenuation The reduction of an acoustic signal.

A‐Weighting A frequency‐response adjustment of a sound level meter that conditions the output signal to approximate human response.

Decibel or dB Fundamental unit of sound, A Bell is defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure squared over the reference pressure squared. A Decibel is one‐tenth of a Bell.

CNEL Commu n i t y N oi s e Eq ui val e n t Le ve l . D e fi ne d as t he 24‐h ou r ave r age noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 ‐ 10 p.m.) weighted by +5 dBA and nighttime hours weighted by +10 dBA.

DNL See definition of Ldn.

IIC Impact Insulation Class. An integer‐number rating of how well a building floor attenuates impact sounds, such as footsteps. A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Frequency The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signal, expressed in cycles per second or hertz (Hz).

Ldn Day/Night Average Sound Level. Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq Equivalent or energy‐averaged sound level.

Lmax The highest root‐mean‐square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

L(n) The sound level exceeded a described percentile over a measurem ent period. For instance, an hourly L50 is the sound level exceeded 50% of the time during the one‐hour period.

Loudness A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

NIC Noise Isolation Class. A rating of the noise reduction between two spaces. Similar to STC but includes sound from flanking paths and no correction for room reverberation.

NNIC Normalized Noise Isolation Class. Similar to NIC but includes a correction for room reverberation.

Noise Unwanted sound.

NRC Noise Reduction Coefficient. NRC is a single‐number rating of the sound‐absorption of a material equal to the arithmetic mean of the sound‐absorption coefficients in the 250, 500, 1000, and 2,000 Hz octave frequency bands rounded to the nearest multiple of 0.05. It is a representation of the amount of sound energy absorbed upon striking a particular surface. An NRC of 0 indicates perfect reflection; an NRC of 1 indicates perfect absorption.

RT60 The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been removed.

Sabin The unit of sound absorption. One square foot of material absor bing 100% of incident sound has an absorption of 1 Sabin.

SEL Sound Exposure Level. SEL is a rating, in decibels, of a discre te event, such as an aircraft flyover or train pass by, that compresses the total sound energy into a one‐second event.

SPC Speech Privacy Class. SPC is a method of rating speech privacy in buildings. It is designed to measure the degree of speech privacy provided by a closed room, indicating the degree to which conversations occurring within are kept private from listeners outside the room.

STC Sound Transmission Class. STC is an integer rating of how well a building partition attenuates airborne sound. It is widely used to rate interior partitions, ceilings/floors, doors, windows and exterior wall configurations. The STC rating is typically used to rate the sound transmission of a specific building element when tested in laboratory conditions where flanking paths around the assembly don’t exist. A larger numb er means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel
scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Threshold The lowest sound that can be perceived by the human auditory system, generally considered of Hearing to be 0 dB for persons with perfect hearing.

Threshold Approximately 120 dB above the threshold of hearing. of Pain
Impulsive Sound of short duration, usually less than one second, with an abrupt onset and rapid decay.

Simple Tone Any sound which can be judged as audible as a single pitch or set of single pitches.

EXHIBIT 1
Appendix B: Continuous Ambient Noise
Measurement Results
EXHIBIT 1
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Wednesday, February 9, 2022 0:00 67 78 65 59 Coordinates: 38.0533165°, Wednesday, February 9, 2022 1:00 66 79 63 58
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:00 68 93 64 58
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 3:00 68 83 67 61
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 4:00 71 83 69 65
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 5:00 73 81 72 68
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 6:00 74 88 74 71
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 7:00 75 83 75 73
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 8:00 75 90 74 71
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 9:00 73 84 72 69
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 10:00 73 90 72 69
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 11:00 73 83 72 68
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 12:00 73 88 72 69
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 13:00 73 82 72 68
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 14:00 73 85 72 68
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 15:00 73 87 73 70
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 16:00 74 89 73 70
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 17:00 73 89 73 70
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 18:00 73 95 72 69
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 19:00 72 85 71 67
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 20:00 71 89 70 66
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 21:00 70 85 69 65
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 22:00 69 85 68 64
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 23:00 68 79 67 62
Leq Lmax L50 L90
73 87 72 69
70 83 68 63
70 82 69 65
75 95 75 73
66 78 63 58
74 93 74 71
77 78
77 22CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
Night Average
CAL200
-121.2597168°
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 Wednesday, February 9, 2022 Statistics
Day Average
Appendix B1: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Cannery Park
Eastern Project Boundary
LDL 820-8
78 79
93 83 83
81 88
83 90
84 90
83 88
82 85
87 89 89
95 85
89 85 85
79 59
58 58
61 65
68 71
73 71
69 69 68 69 68 68
70 70 70 69
67 66
65 64
62 67 66
68 68
71 73
74 75 75
73 73 73 73 73 73 73 74 73 73
72 71
70 69
68 50
55 60
65 70
75 80
85 90
95 100Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1
Eight Mile Rd
EXHIBIT 1
Appendix C: Exterior to Interior Noise Level
Reduction Calculations
EXHIBIT 1
Appendix C1: Interior Noise Calculation Sheet
Project: 220114 Cannery Park
Room Description:

Parallel Exterior level, dBA: 80.0 Ldn
Correction Factor, dBA: 5
Noise Source:

Room Perimeter, ft: 42
Room Area, ft: 120
Room Height, ft: 9
Transmitting Panel Length, ft: 12
Window Area, ft: 24
Ceiling Finish:

Ceiling, sf: 120
Wall Finish 1:

Wall Finish 1, sf: 354
Wall Finish 2:

Wall Finish 2, sf: 24
Floor:

Floor, sf: 120
Misc. Finish:

Misc. Finish, sf: 25
Transmitting Element 1:

Element 1, sf: 84
Transmitting Element 2:

Element 2, sf: 24
Transmitting Element 3:

Element 3, sf:

Transmitting Element 4:

Element 4, sf:

Predicted Interior Noise Level, dBA: 44
-36Noise Reduction, dBA:

Vinyl Plank
Soft Furnishings
Wall - 0.5" OSB, One Coat Stucco, RC
Window - Millgard 7520 Casement STC 40
Bedroom
Inputs
Freeway Traffic - SR99 Turlock
Gyp Board
Gyp Board
Glass
60 58
61 61
64 67
69 67
73 74
71 69
64 62
57 53
36 32 33
34 33
37 36
30 34 34
28 24
20 18
10 12
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1K 1.25K 1.6K 2K 2.5K 3.15K 4K dBA
1/3 Octave Band Center Frequency
Exterior Noise Level Predicted Interior Noise Level
EXHIBIT 1
Appendix C2: Interior Noise Calculation Sheet
Project: 220114 Cannery Park
Room Description:

Parallel Exterior level, dBA: 80.0 Ldn
Correction Factor, dBA: 5
Noise Source:

Room Perimeter, ft: 64
Room Area, ft: 240
Room Height, ft: 9
Transmitting Panel Length, ft: 20
Window Area, ft: 24
Ceiling Finish:

Ceiling, sf: 240
Wall Finish 1:

Wall Finish 1, sf: 552
Wall Finish 2:

Wall Finish 2, sf: 24
Floor:

Floor, sf: 240
Misc. Finish:

Misc. Finish, sf: 25
Transmitting Element 1:

Element 1, sf: 156
Transmitting Element 2:

Element 2, sf: 24
Transmitting Element 3:

Element 3, sf:

Transmitting Element 4:

Element 4, sf:

Predicted Interior Noise Level, dBA: 43
-37Noise Reduction, dBA:

Vinyl Plank
Soft Furnishings
Wall - 0.5" OSB, One Coat Stucco, RC
Window - Millgard 7520 Casement STC 40
Living Room
Inputs
Freeway Traffic - SR99 Turlock
Gyp Board
Gyp Board
Glass
60 58
61 61
64 67
69 67
73 74
71 69
64 62
57 53
35 31 31
33 31
36 35
29 34 33
27 23
20 19
10 10
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1K 1.25K 1.6K 2K 2.5K 3.15K 4K dBA
1/3 Octave Band Center Frequency
Exterior Noise Level Predicted Interior Noise Level
EXHIBIT 1
Appendix D: Traffic Noise Barrier Calculations
EXHIBIT 1
74 68
74 140
10 0
2 8
0 5
0 6
Autos
Medium
Trucks
Heavy
Trucks Total Autos?
Medium
Trucks?
Heavy
Trucks?
6 68 62 69 72 Yes Yes Yes
7 67 61 68 71 Yes Yes Yes
8 65 59 66 69 Yes Yes Yes
9 64 58 65 68 Yes Yes Yes
10 63 57 64 67 Yes Yes Yes
11 62 56 63 66 Yes Yes Yes
12 61 55 62 65 Yes Yes Yes
13 60 54 61 64 Yes Yes Yes
14 60 53 60 63 Yes Yes Yes
Notes:

Project Information:

Noise Level Data:

Site Geometry:

Highway 99
1Location(s):

Auto Ldn, dB:
2043
Job Number:

Description
Appendix D-1
FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108)
Noise Barrier Effectiveness Prediction Worksheet
Starting Barrier Height
-------------------- Ldn, dB --------------------
220114
Cannery Park
1 Standard receiver elevation is five feet above grade/pad elevations at the receiver location(s).

Barrier Effectiveness:
14 9
10 11
12 6
Top of Barrier
Elevation (ft)
Barrier Height2
(ft)
13 7
8 Roadway Name:

Year:

Receiver Description:

Medium Truck Elevation:

Heavy Truck Ldn, dB:

Medium Truck Ldn, dB:

Centerline to Barrier Distance (C1):

Barrier to Receiver Distance (C2):

Automobile Elevation:

Pad/Ground Elevation at Receiver:

Barrier Breaks Line of Sight to…
Heavy Truck Elevation:

Receiver Elevation1:

Cannery Park
Base of Barrier Elevation:

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR
City of Stockton October 2023
141
Appendix C: Transportation Impact Analysis Report
EXHIBIT 1
100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600 | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | (925) 930-7100 | Fax (925) 933-7090 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: March 31, 2022
To: Matt Arnaiz, Eight Mile Road Investors, LLC
Steve McMurtry, DeNovo Planning
From: Ellen Poling and Shangyou Zhou, Fehr & Peers
Subject: VMT Impact Assessment for the Cannery Park Revised Development Plan WC21-3863.00
I. Introduction
This memorandum presents the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impact assessment for the 2021 Cannery Park Project (2021 Project). The 2021 Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the planned land uses on four assessor’s parcels within the 2004 Cannery Park Project (2004 Project). The CEQA analysis for the 2004 Project is documented in Final Environmental Impact Report for Cannery Park Mixed Use Development (August 4. 2004). VMT was not a transportation impact criterion in 2004. Therefore, the CEQA analysis of the 2021 Project includes an analysis with respect to VMT impacts, consistent with the current CEQA Guidelines. As directed by the City of Stockton, this impact assessment compares the VMT impacts of the 2021 Project to those that would result from the 2004 Project.

The Project is located in the northeast corner of the City of Stockton southeast of the intersection of East Eight Mile Road and Holman Road. The Project site is generally bound by East Eight Mile Road to the north, the 99 Frontage Road/State Route 99 to the east, Holman Road to the west, and single-family residential uses to the south.

The project description section of the Initial Study provides a complete descrip tion of the 2021 Project. The land use changes proposed in the 2021 Project are described in Section III of this memorandum.

II. Regulatory Setting
This section provides the regulatory setting relevant to the VMT impact analysis. The remainder of the transportation impact analysis, including the physical setting, is being prepared by others.

EXHIBIT 1
Matt Arnaiz and Steve McMurtry
March 31, 2022

Page 2 of 9 ends

City Council and Concurrent AuthoritiesApril 2, 2024

City Council and Concurrent Authorities
April 2, 2024