City Council and Concurrent Authorities
April 2, 2024

ADDENDUM TO THE

CANNERY PARK EIR
SCH # 2003042022
OCTOBER 2023
Prepared for:

City of Stockton
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
(209) 937-8266
Prepared by:

De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA
(916) 580-9818
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
A L a n d U s e P l a n n i n g , D e s i g n , a n d E n v i r o n m e n t a l F i r m EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT 1

ADDENDUM TO THE

CANNERY PARK EIR

SCH # 2003042022

OCTOBER 2023

Prepared for:

City of Stockton
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
(209) 937-8266

Prepared by:

De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA
(916) 580-9818

EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
1 Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3

1.1 Background and Purpose of the EIR Addendum ..................................................................................... 3

2.2 Project Description ................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.1 Original Project ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Project Location .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Project Characteristics ................................................................................................................................................. 4

2.2 Revised Project ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Project Location .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Project Characteristics ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Commercial Component .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Low Density Residential Component .................................................................................................................... 7 High Density Residential Component .................................................................................................................... 7 General Plan and Zoning Designations ...................................................................................................................... 7 Existing City of Stockton General Plan Land Use Designations .................................................................. 8 Existing City of Stockton Zoning Designations .................................................................................................. 8 Surrounding General Plan Designations .............................................................................................................. 9

2.3 Basis for Decision to Prepare an Addendum ............................................................................................ 9

3.0 Environmental Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 24

3.1 AESTHETICS, LIGHT, AND GLARE ......................................................................................................................... 25

3.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................... 28

3.3 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................................................................................... 31

3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................................... 38

3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................. 52

3.6 ENERGY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 54

3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................................................... 60

3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ............................................................................................................................... 72

3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ......................................................................................................... 76

3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................. 82

3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING .................................................................................................................................... 92 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
2 3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................. 95

3.13 NOISE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 96

3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING ............................................................................................................................. 106

3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES .................................................................................................................................................... 109

3.16 RECREATION ............................................................................................................................................................. 117

3.17 TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................................................. 119

3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................... 123

3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ................................................................................................................. 125

3.20 WILDFIRE .................................................................................................................................................................... 134 References ............................................................................................................................................................................. 136 Appendix A: Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modeling Outputs ......................................................... 139 Appendix B: Noise Report ............................................................................................................................................... 140 Appendix C: Transportation Impact Analysis Report .......................................................................................... 141

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
3 1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Addendum was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. This document has been prepared to serve as an Addendum to the previously certified EIR (State Clearinghouse [SCH] # 2003042022) for the Cannery Park Project (Original Project). The City of Stockton is the lead agency for the environmental review of the proposed Project refinements (Revised Project).

This Addendum addresses the proposed refinements that have occurred to the tentative map, General Plan Amendment, and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 defines an Addendum as:

The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. ….A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record.

Information and technical analyses from the Original Project are utilized throughout this Addendum.

Relevant passages from this document are cited and available for review at:

City of Stockton
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
(209) 937-8266

1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE EIR ADDENDUM
The Cannery Park Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the Stockton City Council in September 2004. The Original Project included certification of the EIR for Cannery Park, General Plan land use amendments , prezoning, approval of a tentative subdivision map, approval of a Development Agreement, and an amendment to the Eight Mile Road Specific Plan.

In determining whether an Addendum is the appropriate document to analyze the proposed refinements to the Cannery Park, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states:
a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
d) The decision -making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
4 e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s required findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanat ion must be supported by substantial evidence.

2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 ORIGINAL PROJECT
Project Location
The Original Project site consists of the approximately 448.4-acre site, located at northeastern boundary of the City of Stockton in an area of very active urban development , within the City of Stockton at its northeastern li mits. The Original P roject site is i mmediately southwest of the intersection of SR 99 and Eight Mile Road. The Project site’s regional location is shown on Figure 1.

Project Characteristics
The Original Project involved the annexation of 489.40 acres located in the unincorporated county adjacent to the City of Stockton at its northeastern limits to establis h a mixed -use development consisting of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. In addition to the annexation, the Original Project required amendments to the City’s General Plan, prezoning, approval of a tentative subdivision map, approval of a Development Agreement, and an amendment to the Eight Mile Road Specific Plan.

As part of the General Plan Amendments, the Original Project eliminated an existing Industrial designation located south of Bear Creek in favor of Low -Medium Density Residential, re placed an existing Administrative/Professional designation north of Bear Creek with Commercial, expanded the existing Commercial designation at Eight Mile Road/SR 99, and eliminated an existing High Density Residential designation in favor of a relocated, larger designation. The Original Project tentative subdivision map created a total of 1,287 parcels which would facilitate the future development of up to 2.5 million square feet of industrial and commercial uses and up to 1,287 residential units, consisting of up to 1,077 single family and 210 multi-family residential units.

2.2 REVISED PROJECT
Project Location
The Revised Project site is a portion of the Original Project site , and is comprised of 99.88 acres located in the northeast corner of the City of Stockton southeast of the intersection of East Eight Mile Road and Holman Road. The Project site is generally bound by East Eight Mile Road to the north, the 99 Frontage Road/State Route 99 to the east, Holman Road to the west, and single-family residential uses to the south. Bear Creek bisects the Revised Project site flowing southwest from the northeast corner of the Revised Project site continuing under Holman Road. PFC Jess e Mizener Street also bisects the southern portion of the Revised Project site. The City limits and Sphere of Influence run conterminous with Eight Mile Road and State Route 99, adjacent to the northern and eastern boundaries of the Revised Project site, a nd the City limits run conterminous with a portion of the southern boundary of the Revised Project site. Figures 1 and 2 show the Project site’s regional EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
5 location and vicinity. Figure 3 provides the APN map, Figure 4 provides a topographic map, and Figure 5 provides an aerial photo of the Revised Project site.

Project Characteristics
The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.8 7-acre Revised Project site. The Original P roject sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. Over the past 14 years the market has not shown an interest in these land uses, while at the same time the demand for housing has reached a crisis status in the State of California. As a result, the Revised Project seeks to reverse some of the 2004 approvals by changing commercial land uses to residential land uses to better reflect the market demand, and to assist in the current housing crisis.

The General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re-designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses.

The Rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses.

The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzo ned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the existing General Plan land use designations and Zoning districts, and Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the proposed General Plan land use designations and Zoning districts.

Additionally, Table 2 provides a summary of the proposed General Plan Amendments and Table 3 provides a summary of the rezone.

TABLE 2: REVISED PROJECT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS SUMMARY

EXISTING LAND USES EXISTING ACREAGE PROPOSED ACREAGE
Commercial 88.61 19.76
Low Density Residential 0.00 67.78
High Density Residential 11.27 12.34
Total 99.88 99.88

TABLE 3: REVISED PROJECT REZONE SUMMARY

EXISTING ZONING EXISTING ACREAGE PROPOSED ACREAGE
Commercial 88.61 19.76
Low Density Residential 0.00 67.78
High Density Residential 11.27 12.34
Total 99.88 99.88
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
6 The General Plan Amendment, rezone, and Tentative Map would allow for the subdivision of the

99.88-acre Revised Project site into 15 commercial development lots, 331 single family residential lots, and one 12.34 -acre high density residential remainder lot for future development of between 162 and 296 units (assumes 13.2 -24 units/acre gross). The 15 commercial development lots are proposed on 19.76 acres of land that has existing General Plan and Zoning for commercial uses. This area is part of the Tentative Map, but is not part of the General Plan Amendment or Rezone. The proposed tentative subdivision map is shown in Figure 10.

As shown on Figure 10, the 15 commercial development lots and 12.34-acre high density residential parcel is located north of Bear Creek while the 331 single family residential lots are located south of Bear Creek. As part of the Original Project, the Collector A bridge shown on the approved Tentative Map was proposed over Bear Creek to provide access from Eight Mile Road to the commer cial area south of Bear Creek; however, as part of this proposed tentative subdivision map, the applicant is seeking to revise the circulation map to omit the bridge over Bear Creek and instead rely on existing streets and new internal roadways, as well as the new Holman Road bridge located just west of the Revised Project site.

Commercial Component
The proposed tentative subdivision map subdivides the 19.76 -acre commercial portion of the Revised Project site into 15 development lots. The applicant is proposing to process site plan reviews prior to developing the 15 commercial lots. It is not known what exactly would be developed on the commercial lots, but examples of allowed commercial uses include: quick serve restaurants with drive thru, gas station and convenience store, medical office/clinic, office, hotel, and other commercial businesses. At some future time when the applicant knows the actual uses and building needs, they will prepare site plan review applications for consideration by the City. Table 4 provided the lot size for each of the 15 commercial lots.

TABLE 4: REVISED PROJECT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

PARCEL LOT SIZE
1 113,021
2 43,328
3 62,789
4 65,759
5 73,162
6 40,901
7 47,048
8 70,067
9 39,281
10 35,726
11 35,060
12 30,293
13 25,649
14 27,570
15 27,692
TOTAL 737,346
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
7 As shown in Figure 10, northern site access would be via a proposed north-south street (Collector A) connecting to Eight Mile Road and western site access would be via a new east-west street (Tri-Valley Drive) connecting to Holman Road. Both new streets include a traffic circl e at the end of the public street. Site circulation is provided by new internal driveways along the eastern and southern boundary of the site, as well as driveways connecting the parking lots.

Low Density Residential Component
The proposed tentative subdivision map subdivides the 67.78-acre portion of the Revised Project site proposed to be designated Low Density Residential into 331 single family residential lots. The proposal results in a density of approximately 4.88 units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan’s low-density residential density range.

It is anticipated that 267 of the single -family residential lots would be located on 55.88 acres generally bound by Bear Creek to the north, SR 99 Frontage Road to the east, PFC Jesse Mizener Street to the south, and the WID South Main Canal to the west. As shown on Figure 10, site access would be provided by two new north-south streets connecting to PFC Jesse Mizener Street and site circulation would be provided by new residential streets with the lots oriented in a grid-like pattern.

The remaining 64 single-family residential lots would be located on 11.90 acres generally bound by PFC Jesse Mizener Street to the north, SR 99 Frontage Road to the east, residential development to the west, and single family residential to the south. As shown on Figure 10, northern site access would be provided by a new north -south street connecting to PFC Jesse Mizener Street and western site access would be provided by an extension of Jennings Lane from Vi llage C in the Original Project.

Jennings Lane provides east-west internal circulation of this village.

High Density Residential Component
The proposed tentative subdivision map would create a 12.34 -acre parcel to be developed for high density residential uses. The General Plan’s density range for this use ranges from 13.2 to 24 units per gross acre. As such, the 12.34 -acre site would be anticipated to result in between 162 and 296 residential units.1 A specific site plan and development proposal has not been developed for this site at this time.

Community Facilities District 2019-1 (Cannery Park II)
The City Council adopted a resolution and ordinance forming a new community facilities district (“CFD”) covering a portion of the Cannery Park development. The new CFD (CFD 2019-1) facilitates the completion of the Cannery Park development, the remaining portion of which was expected to

1 It should be noted that, due to constraints associated with commercial noise in the vicinity of the High Density Residential component of the Revised Project, the number of high density residential units are likely to be at the lower end (or even below) this range of units. Neve rtheless, for the sake of a conservative analysis, this Addendum analyzes the Revised Project with the higher end of the range ( i.e., 296 units) for high density residential units.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
8 include approximately 511 single -family homes, 210 multi -family units and 128 acres of commercial/light industrial property.

The Rate and Method of Apportionment includes a Special Tax A of $1,600 per single -family home, $7,500 per acre for multifamily, and from $4,145 to $4,500 for light industrial and commercial that will support the debt service on the bonds until the bonds ar e paid in full . At the payoff of bonds, a transition component will be added to the Special Tax B to pay for the City’s ongoing maintenance of that infrastructure. Special Tax A is not intended to generate revenue for the City, rather it is intended to pay debt service on the bonds.

The Rate and Method of Apportionment also includes a Special Tax B of $520 per single-family parcel and $343.20 for multi-family parcel that addresses the City’s costs to service the new homes and to maintain the City’s infrastructure. Special Tax B will generate (331 single family units x $520) + (300 multi-family units x $343.20) or $172,120 + $102,960 or $275,080 the first year and then increasing by 4% per year thereafter to keep pace with inflation and the City’s service delivery costs.

GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
Existing City of Stockton General Plan Land Use Designations The Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the Project site as Commercial and High Density Residential. Figure 6 depicts the Envision 2040 Stockton General Plan land use designations for the Project site and the surrounding areas. The General Plan contains the following standards to guide development for the land uses within the Project site:

Commercial (C): This designation allows for a wide variety of retail, service, and commercial recreational uses; business, medical, and professional offices; r esidential uses; public and quasi - public uses; and other similar and compatible uses. Community or regional commercial centers as well as freestanding commercial establishments are permitted. In addition, limited industrial uses are allowed, provided that they are indoors and compatible with surrounding uses. The maximum FAR ranges differ based on the geographic area. Outside the Greater Downtown, the maximum FAR is 0.30.

High Density Residential (HDR) : This designation allows for multi -family residential units, apartments, dormitories, group homes, guest homes, public and quasi-public uses, and other similar and compatible uses. This designation also allows neighborhood serving retail, commercial service, and mixed uses in appropriate locations that provide residents with easy access to daily services and necessities within their neighborhood, provided that they are compatible with surrounding uses. The allowable density and intensity ranges differ based on the geographic area. Outside of the Greater Downton, this designation allows 13.2 to 24 units per gross acre and 17.5 to 30 units per net acre.

Additionally, the maximum FAR for neighborhood serving retail uses is 0.30.

Existing City of Stockton Zoning Designations
Figure 7 depicts the City’s zoning districts for the Project site and the surrounding areas. The Project site is zoned CG (Commercial, General), and RH (Residential, High Density). Below is a general description of the zoning districts within the Project site.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
9 CG (Commercial, General) District: This zone is applied to areas appropriate for a wide variety of general commercial uses, including retail, personal and business services; commercial recreational uses; and a mix of office, commercial, and/or residential uses. The CG zoning district is c onsistent with the commercial land use designation of the General Plan.

RH (Residential, High Density) District: This zone is applied to high -density residential neighborhoods. Allowable housing types may include multifamily and various types of group housing, as well as high density single -family residential development. The RH zoning district is consistent with the High Density Residential land use designation of the General Plan. Consistent with the General Plan, allowable densities for land Outside the Greater Downtown is 17.5 to 30 dwelling units per net acre and 13.2 to 24 dwelling units per gross acre. Additionally, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for neighborhood-serving retail uses is 0.30.

Surrounding General Plan Designations
Within San Joaquin County, lands to the north are designated Limited Agricultural (A/L) and Freeway Service Commercial (C/FS); lands to the east are designated Freeway Service Commercial (C/FS), Community Commercial (C/C), Rural Residential (R/R), and Very Low Density Resid ential (R/VL); and land to the south is designated Low Density Residential (R/L). Within the City, lands to the west are designated Industrial and Low Density Residential and lands to the south are designated Low Density Residential. The City’s General Plan also designates land within unincorporated San Joaquin County to the north as Open Space/Agriculture, to the east as Residential Estate, and to the south as Low Density Residential. The City of Stockton and San Joaquin County General Plan land use designations for the Project site and surrounding areas are shown on Figure 6.

Entitlements Requested: The entitlements requested include: General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Tentative Map Approval. The EIR Addendum is being prepared to reflect the lack of demand for the commercial uses, and the need to provide residential uses, within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site.

2.3 BASIS FOR DECISION TO PREPARE AN ADDENDUM
When an environmental impact report has been certified for a project, Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164 set forth the criteria for determining whether a subsequent EIR, subsequent negative declaration, addendum, or no further documentation b e prepared in support of further agency action on the project. Under these Guidelines, a subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared if any of the following criteria are met:
(a) When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR sh all be prepared for that pro ject u nless the lead a gency d etermines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or n egative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental ef fects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
10 (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) T he project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more s ignificant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
(b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, and addendum, or no further documentation.

In determining whether an Addendum is the appropriate document to analyze the proposed refinements to the project and its approval, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration) states:
a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only mino r technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project.
e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s required findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.

Based on a detaile d review and analysis of the Revised Project by the City, it was determined that there was no evidence that there would be any new significant environmental effects, a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified environmental effects, or new information of substantial importance that would require major changes to the certified Cannery Park EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a). Therefore, a Subsequent EIR is not warranted for this project.

It should be noted that one of the rat ionales associated with Original EIR Statement of Overriding Considering was that the Original Project included an expectation that 1.9 million square feet of commercial development , including significant anchor shopping store s, would be developed to generate jobs and revenue for the community. This was a major consideration for the override of EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
11 environmental impacts caused by the Original Project. The City, however, recognizes that o ver the past 14 years the market has not shown an interest in these land us es for the originally anticipated commercial uses, while at the same time the demand for housing for the community has become a major consideration. While the creation of jobs and revenue remains important, over the last few years the housing demand has re ached crisis status in the State of California , with the legislation passing the “The Housing Crisis Act of 2019” (HCA) . HCA establishes a statewide “housing emergency” until January 1, 2030. During the housing emergency, the Housing Crisis Act suspends certain restrictions on the development of new housing and expedites the permitting of housing. In response to this declaration by the State, the City seeks to develop the appropriate housing stock to meet demand for the community. As a result, the Revised Project presents the City with an opportunity to establish additional residential uses to better reflect the housing emergency status, while acknowledging the jobs and revenues that are generated its development in the immediate future. In doing so, the City recognizes that the construction and sale of new homes on the Project site will result in immediate new jobs and revenue, which is in alignment with the City’s original consideration for approving the Original EIR . Sales jobs for the new homes are ant icipated to be in the range of $6-8 million at buildout of the Project, with additional long-term revenue from the resale of homes in perpetuity. These jobs are anticipated to be largely from the local community.

Construction jobs for the development are a nticipated to be in the range of $40 -60 million in labor, with additional long -term labor revenue from the local contractors, renovators, maintenance workers, and landscapers in perpetuity. These jobs are also anticipated to be largely from the local community. There are also jobs that are created in the supply of materials to build the project (i.e. contractor supplies), as well as to long terms jobs to provide services to the new residents. Because the emergency status of housing (i.e., lack of housing stock), it is anticipated that the Revised Project will develop in the immediate future and that the sales, construction, and service jobs associated with its development and long -term operation will be imminent. For these reasons, the City’s prior considerations for overriding the environmental impacts due to the new jobs and revenue generating benefits would still hold true under the Revised Project.

As part of this document, additional technical analysis was performed to determine if there were any new en vironmental impacts not known at the time of the original approval. No new significant impacts or an increase in the severity of environmental impacts have been identified as a result of the additional technical analysis. Instead, the Revised Project includes modifications to the land uses within the Revised Project site, which would replace commercial uses with residential uses, which do not have any additional significant detrimental environmental effects. The beneficial impacts of the Revised Project are related to reductions in air quality, greenhouse gas, and energy impacts, compared to the Original Project.

As demonstrated in the environmental analysis provided in Section 3.0 (Environmental Analysis), the proposed changes do not meet the criteria for preparing a subsequent EIR or negative declaration. An addendum is appropriate here because, as explained in Section 3.0, none of the conditions calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
12 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
13 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
14 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
15 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
16 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
17 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
18 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
19 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
20 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
21 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
22 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
23 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
24 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This section of the Addendum provides analysis and cites substantial evidence that support’s the City’s determination that the proposed refinements to the Cannery Park Project (Original Project) do not meet the criteria for preparing a subsequent or supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.

The proposed changes do not cause a new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact, and there have been no other changes in the circumstances that meet this criterion (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a][2]). There have been no changes in the environmental conditions on the property not contemplated and analyzed in the EIR that would result in new or substantially more severe envi ronmental impacts. There is no new information of substantial importance (which was not known or could not have been known at the time of the application, that identifies: a new significant impact (condition “A” under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a][3]); a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact (condition “B” CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a][3]); mitigation measures or alternatives previously found infeasible that would now be feasible and would substantially red uce one or more significant effects; or mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR which would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment (conditions “C” and “D” CEQA Gui delines Section 15162[a][3]). None of the “new information” conditions listed in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[a][3] are present here to trigger the need for a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states that “The lead agency o r a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” An addendum is appro priate here because, as explained above, none of the conditions calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.

The section below identifies the environmental topics addressed in the EIR, provides a summary of impacts associated with the Original Project, as described in the EIR, and includes a brief analysis of the potential impacts associated with the Revised Project when compared to the Original Project.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
25 3.1 AESTHETICS, LIGHT, AND GLARE
Environmental
Issue Area
Conclusion in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact AES-1:

Scenic Resources
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact AES-2:

Scenic resources,
including but not
limited to trees,
rock
outcroppings,
and historic
buildings within
a State scenic
highway
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact AES-3:

Visual Character
and Quality
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact AES-4:

Light and glare
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to aesthetics and visual resources. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re-designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate

11.27 acres of high density residential land locate d south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density resident ial uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The Cannery Park EIR required the implementation of several mitigation measures (listed below), which require compliance with the Stockton Citywide Design Guidelines, and which ensure that design specifications for the new industrial or commercial developments to require that all outdoor lighting be shielded to prevent glare onto, or excessive illumination of, adjoining residential areas.

These mitigation measures would still be required and enforced. The changes associated with the Revised Project, which would reduce the number of commercial uses and increase the number of EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
26 residential uses, would not generate any new impacts. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions associated with the Revised Project.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Aesthetic Effects of Commercial Development
Mitigation Measure 1: The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall submit site plans, elevations and other materials for design review and approval in conjunction with permit applications for development, as required by the Stockton Citywide Design Guidelines.

Aesthetic Effects of Residential Development
Mitigation Measure 1: Design of rear and side facades of residential structures shall be subject to the requirements of the City’s Citywide Design Guidelines, as applicable.

Light and Glare impacts
Mitigation Measure 1: Design specifications for new industrial or commercial development associated with the project shall require that all outdoor lighting be shieled to prevent glare onto or excessive illumination of, adjoining residential areas.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses AES-1, AES-3): The General Plan does not designate scenic vistas. However, the General Plan identifies open space, agricultural fields, and riparian areas, particularly along the San Joaquin River and the Calaveras River, as sig nificant visual features. Given the relatively flat topography of the city, views within the core of the city are generally limited to the built environment. Views along the periphery can be more expansive with fewer developed features blocking views of su rrounding open space, agricultural fields, and riparian areas.

Although the Revised Project site is not designated as a scenic vista by the General Plan, the site does contain some of the visual features discussed in the General Plan, such as agricultural fields and riparian area along Bear Creek. The above -referenced public views are primarily available to motorists traveling along the major transportation corridors, some of which travel at highway speed (such as along SR 99). In addition, these public vie ws of agricultural fields and riparian areas are characteristic of San Joaquin County, and they exist throughout the region.

Implementation of the Revised Project would change the existing visual character of the site from a primarily agricultural site to an urbanized site. Impacts related to a change in visual character are largely subjective and very difficult to quantify. People have different reactions to the visual quality of a project or a project feature, and what is considered “attractive” to one viewer may be considered “unattractive” to other viewers. The agricultural lands on the Revised Project site provide visual relief from urban and suburban developments, and help to define the character of a region. The loss of agricultural lands can have an adverse cumulative impact on the overall visual character and quality of a region. However, the change in character of the Revised Project site from agricultural lands to urban uses was previously anticipated and approved for the Original Project.

Project implementation would introduce residential and commercial uses, as well as supporting infrastructure into an area that was planned and approved for primarily commercial uses. The proposed uses are unlikely to degrade the existing character of the Revised Project site in comparison EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
27 to the approved uses under the Original Project. All habitat along Bear Creek would remain unchanged.

In order to reduce visual impacts, development within the Project site is required to be consistent with the General Plan and the Stockton Zoning Ordinance which includes design standards in order to ensure quality and cohesive design of the Revised Project site and ensure the public views from the transportation corridors would be of high quality. These standards include specifications for exterior lighting, landscaping, and architectural design and compatibility. Implementation of the City’s design standards would ensure quality design throughout the Revised Project site, and result in a project that would be internally cohesive while maintaining aesthetics similar to surrounding uses. With implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the Cannery Park EIR, implementation of the Revised Project would ensure a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Response AES-2): The Revised Project site is not located within view of a state scenic highway. Only one highway section in San Joaquin County is listed as a Designated Scenic Highway by the Caltrans Scenic Highway Mapping System; the segment of Interstate 580 (I -580) from Interstate 5 to Interstate 205. This route traverses the edge of the Coast Range to the west and Central Valley to the east. The City of Stockton, including the Revised Project site, is not visible from this roadway segment, which is located approximately 27 miles southwest of the site. Therefore, there is no impact related to a state scenic highway.

Response AES-4): Implementation of the Revised Project would introduce new sources of light and glare that are common in new development . New sources of glare would occur primarily from the windshields of vehicles travelling to and from the Revised Project site. There is also the potential for reflective building materials and windows to result in increases in daytime glare. Lighting in the residential portion of the Project site would be consistent with other residential areas throughout Stockton.

The City controls the potentia l for lighting impacts through existing regulations in the Municipal Code. Section 16.32.070, Light and Glare, of Chapter 16.32, General Performance Standards, of the City Municipal Code contains standards and provisions related to exterior lighting for bo th commercial and residential development. The primary purpose of this section is to regulate exterior lighting to balance the safety and security needs for lighting with the City’s desire to prevent emissions of light or glare beyond the property line, or upward into the sky.

A lighting plan will be prepared for future development of each component of the project. The lighting plan will be submitted to the City for review and approval during site plan review (for Commercial and High Density Residential parcels) or during improvement plan review (for single family residential development) . All proposed outdoor lighting must meet applicable city standards regulating outdoor lighting in o rder to minimize any impacts resulting from outdoor lighting on adjacent properties. Lighting and glare guidelines provided in the City of Stockton’s Municipal Code for Design and Development require that all light sources be shielded and directed downwards so as to minimize trespass light and glare to adjacent residences. Additionally, all outdoor lighting sources of 1,000 lumens or greater shall be fully shielded.

Consistency with the existing ordinance requiring a detailed lighting plan will ensure that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
28 3.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
Environmental
Issue Area
Conclusion in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact AG-1:

Conversion of
Farmland
Significant
and
Unavoidable
Even with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact AG-2:

Williamson Act
Contracts
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact AG-3:

Conflict with
zoning for forest
land/timberland
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact AG-4:

Conversion of
Forest Land
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact AG-5:

Indirect
conversion of
farmland or
forest land
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to agricultural resources. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site. The Original P roject sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate

11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The proposed project changes would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to agricultural and forest resources. The area of disturbance of the Revised Project would not be larger than that analyzed within the Original Project, and the Revised Project would not result in any increased impacts to agricultural lands or resources beyond those addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. The Revised Project would still be subject to the requirements of the mitigation measur es included within the Cannery Park EIR (listed below), which requires the payment of agricultural land conversion fees, as required. This mitigation measure contained within the Cannery Park EIR would EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
29 still be required and enforced. No new mitigation meas ures are required for the Revised Project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Conversion of Agricultural Land
Mitigation Measure 1 : The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall participate in an equitable program for payment of agricultural land conversion mitigation fees if such system is adopted by the City of Stockton.

Williamson Act Contracts
Mitigation Measure 1 : The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall participate in an equ itable program for payment of agricultural land conversion mitigation fees if such system is adopted by the City of Stockton.

Agricultural Access and Irrigation
Mitigation Measure 1: The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall coordinate proposed relocation of the South Main Canal and crossings of this and other canals with WID and City staff. Improvement plans for aspects of the project that would impact WID facilities shall be subject to the review and approval of WID and City staff.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response AG-1): The Revised Project represents a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The potential for the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) was addressed in the EIR for the Original Project.

The Revised Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan policies rel ated to this topic, and the Revised Project does not cause an impact greater than what has already been considered in the Cannery Park EIR for the Original Project.

The Revised Project is subject to the City’s agricultural mitigation fee program and the SJ MSCP.

Payment of these fees is standard for the conversion of farmland in the City of Stockton. Different types of land require different levels of mitigation. The entirety of San Joaquin County is mapped according to each land use category so that landow ners, project proponents and project reviewers are aware of the applicable SJMSCP fees for the proposed development. The appropriate fees are collected by the City and remitted to SJCOG for administration. SJCOG uses the funds to preserve open space land o f comparable types throughout the County, often coordinating with other private or public land trusts to purchase conservation easements or buy land outright for preservation. Fees are automatically adjusted on an annual basis. It is noted that the Project applicant has already paid the SJMSCP fees for the entire Revised Project site as part of the Original Project.

The Project applicant will be required to pay the established agricultural mitigation fees for loss of agricultural land. Fees paid toward the City’s program at the building permit stage are used to fund conservation easements on comparable or better agricultural lands to provide compensatory mitigation. The impact conclusion in the EIR for the Original Project was significant and unavoidable. Th e Revised Project would not create a new impact, and would not increase the severity of the original impact on farmland.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
30 Response AG-2): The Project site is not under a Williamson Act contract. The Revised Project would not conflict with existing zoning f or agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. Implementation of the Revised Project would have no impact relative to this issue.

Response AG-3): The Project site is not forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 1222(g)) or timberland (a s defined in Public Resources Code section 4526). The proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land or timberland.

Implementation of the Revised Project would have no impact relative to this issue.

Response AG-4): The Revised Project site is not forest land. The Revised Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Implementation of the Revised Project would have no impact relative to this issue.

Response AG-5): The Revised Project site does not contain forest land, and there is no forest land in the vicinity of the Revised Project site. The Project site would result in a conversion of the land to non-farmland. The Revised Project does not involve any other changes in the existing environment not disclosed under the previous responses which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non -agricultural use, or conversion of forest land to non -forest use.

Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this issue.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
31 3.3 AIR QUALITY
Environmental
Issue Area
Conclusion in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact AQ-1:

Conflict with or
obstruct
implementation
of the applicable
air quality plan?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
Even with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact AQ -2:

Result in a
cumulatively
considerable net
increase of any
criteria pollutant
for which the
project region is
non-attainment
under an
applicable
federal or state
ambient air
quality standard?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
Even with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact AQ -3:

Expose sensitive
receptors to
substantial
pollutant
concentrations?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
Even with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact AQ -4:

Result in other
emissions (such
as those leading
to odors)
adversely
affecting a
substantial
number of
people?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to air quality. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original P roject sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for l ow density residential uses, 2) re-designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
32 land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential use s, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The proposed project changes would not result in any new or altered impacts wi th respect to air quality. The area of disturbance of the Revised Project would not be larger than that analyzed within the Original Project. Additionally, the Revised Project would result in reduced impacts to air quality compared with the impacts addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. Additionally, the Revised Project would still be subject to the requirements of the mitigation measures included within the Canner y Park EIR. These mitigation measures contained within the Cannery Park EIR would still be required and enforced. No new mitigation measures are required for the Revised Project.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Construction Related Emissions
Mitigation Measure 1 : During construction, the owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest will comply with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII (Fugitive Dust Rules).

Mitigation Measure 2: The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall implement the following dust control practices, drawn from Tables 6-2 and 6-3 of GAMAQI, during construction:
• All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for construction proposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water, chemical stabilizer/suppressant, or vegetative ground cover.
• All on-site unpaved roads and off­site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
• All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill, and demolition activities shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust em1ss1ons utilizing application of water or by presoaking. • When materials are transported off­site, all materials shall be covered, effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, or at least six inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained. • All operations shall limit or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from adjacent public streets at le ast once every 24 hours when operations are occurring. {The use of dry rotary brushes is expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit the visible dust em1ss1ons.)(Use of blower devices 1s expressly forbidden.) • Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions utilizing sufficient water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
• Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph; and
• Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent.

Ozone Precursor Emissions
Mitigation Measure 1: Subdivision improvements shall incorporate the following features, consistent with adopted City improvement standards.
• Bus turnouts and transit improvements where requested by SMART. • Continuous public sidewalks adjacent to all proposed public streets. • Pedestrian/bicycle path along the south Bear Creek levee. • Pavements and striping for bike lanes/paths consistent with Stockton Bikeways Plan. • Direct pedestrian connections between proposed residential and commercial areas.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
33 • Street lighting per City standards.
• Pedestrian signalization, signage and safety designs at signalized intersections. • Include shade trees to shade sidewalks in street-side landscaping areas. • Incorporate traffic calming measures consistent with adopted City standards.

Mitigation Measure 2: The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest of commercial development projects within Cannery Park shall prepare and implement a transportation demand management (TOM) plan that incorporates feasible TDMs, potentially including but not limited to measures listed below. The plan shall be subject to City review and approval.
• Provide secure bicycle parking in conjunction with retail commercial development. • Provide designated van pool parking spaces close to the employment center entry locations. • Provide preferential car pool parking spaces close to the employment center entry locations. • Offer flex time and compressed work week work schedule options. • Provide on-site amenities that encourage alternative transportation modes such as locker, shower, secure bike storage facilities.
• Provide on-site services such as persona! mail boxes and day care that reduce mid­day trip generation. • Provide telecommuting options.
• Provide transit vouchers.
• Provide information to employees on carpooling, ride sharing and other available programs.

Mitigation Measure 3: Retail commercial development adjacent to Eight Mile Road and SR 99 West Frontage Road shall incorporate sufficient parking to permit park-and-ride use and shall make said parking available for that purpose, as required by the City Department of Public Works.

Mitigation Measure 4: Residential development shall incorporate the following features:
• Install central water heaters.
• No wood stoves or fireplaces,
• Orient proposed residential lots north/south to permit solar siting.

Carbon Monoxide Emissions
Mitigation Measure 1: The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall design and construct, or pay proportionate share costs as appropriate, for the transportation improvements identified m Chapter 16.0 Transportation/Circulation.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses AQ-1- AQ-2): Air quality emissions would be generated during construction and during operation of the Revised Project. Operational emissions would come primarily from vehicle emissions from vehicle trips generated by the Revised Project and from the use of energy (i.e., electricity and natural gas) within the Revised Project buildings. Since the Revised Project is a General Plan amendment and a rezone of the Original Project, the following discussion includes an analysis of the Revised Project’s construction and operational-related emissions in comparison to the Original Project’s construction and operational -related emissions. It is noted that the impact conclusion in the EIR for the Original Project was significant and unavoidable.

Construction-Related Emissions
The SJVAPCD’s approach to analysis of construction impacts is to require implementation of effective and comprehensive control measures, rather than to require detailed quantification of emission concentrations for modeling o f direct impacts. PM 10 emitted during construction can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions, and other factors, making quantification difficult. Despite this EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
34 variability in emissions, experience has shown that there are a number of feasible control measures that can be reasonably implemented to significantly reduce PM 10 emissions from construction activities. The SJVAPCD has determined that, on its own, compliance with Regulation VIII for all sites and implementation of all other control measures indicated in Tables 6 -2 and 6-3 of the SJVAPCD’s Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (as appropriate) would constitute sufficient mitigation to reduce construction PM10 impacts to a level considered less than significant.

Construction would result in numerous activities that would generate dust. The fine, silty soils in the Project site and often strong afternoon winds exacerbate the pote ntial for dust, particularly in the summer months. Impacts would be localized and variable. Construction impacts are anticipated to last for approximately eight years. The initial phase of Project construction would involve grading and site preparation activities, followed by building construction. Construction activities that could generate dust and vehicle emissions are primarily related to grading, soil excavation, and other ground-preparation activities, as well as building construction.

Control measures are required and enforced by the SJVAPCD under Regulation VIII. The SJVAPCD considers construction-related emissions from all projects in this region to be mitigated to a less than significant level if SJVAPCD-recommended PM10 fugitive dust rules and equipment exhaust emissions controls are implemented. The Revised Project would be required to comply with all applicable measures from SJVAPCD Rule VIII.

Table AIR -1 (below) provides the maximum construction -related criteria pollutant emissions modeling results for both the Original Project (i.e., the existing condition) and the Revised Project from CalEEMod in comparison to the SJVAPCD thresholds for criteria air pollutants. It should be noted that the results below include the SJVAPCD -recommended PM 10 fugitive dust rules and equipment exhaust emissions controls within the CalEEMod modeling, and are therefore considered ‘mitigated’ within CalEEMod, even though no mitigation (as defined by CEQA) was applied to the Revised Project.

As shown in Table AIR -1, none of the Revised Project’s maximum construction -related emissions modeling results would exceed the SJVAPCD criteria pollutant thresholds. Moreover, the Original Project’s maximum construction -related emissions modeling results for each of the criteria pollutants exceed the results for the Revised Project. Therefore, the Revised Project is anticipated to generate a net reduction in construction -related emissions as compared with the Original Project (i.e., as compared with the existing condition). That is, the Revised Project is anticipated to have a net beneficial impact with regard to construction -related criteria pollutant emissions, when compared to the existing condition.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
35 TABLE AIR-1: ORIGINAL & PROPOSED PROJECT MAXIMUM CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR) Emissions
Type
Original
Project
Emissions
Proposed
Project
Emissions
Proposed
Project Net
Emissions

SJVAPCD
Threshold
Above
Threshold in
Proposed
Project?
ROG 6.9403 6.4169 -0.5234 10 N
NOx 3.8720 3.5280 -0.344 10 N
CO 4.0409 3.6355 -0.4054 100 N
PM10 0.8125 0.6870 -0.1255 15 N
PM2.5 0.3419 0.3088 -0.0331 15 N
SOx 0.0141 0.0100 -0.0041 27 N
Source: CalEEMod, v. 2020.4.0
Operational Emissions
For the purposes of this operational air quality analysis, actions that violate Federal standards for criteria pollutants (i.e., primary standards designed to safeguard the health of people considered to be sensitive receptors while outdoors and secondary standards designed to safeguard human welfare) are considered significant impacts. Addit ionally, actions that violate State standards developed by the CARB or criteria developed by the SJVAPCD, including thresholds for criteria pollutants, are considered significant impacts.

SJVAPCD Rule 9510 Indirect Source Review
District Rule 9510 requires developers of large residential, commercial and industrial projects to reduce smog-forming (NOx) and particulate (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions generated by their projects.

The Rule applies to many project types, including to projects which, upon full build-out, will include 50 residential units or more. Project developers are required to reduce:
• 20 percent of construction-exhaust nitrogen oxides;
• 45 percent of construction-exhaust PM10;
• 33 percent of operational nitrogen oxides over 10 years; and • 50 percent of operational PM10 over 10 years.

Developers are encouraged to meet these reduction requirements through the implementation of on- site mitigation; however, if the on -site mitigation does not achieve the required baseline emission reductions, the Project applicant will mitigate the difference by paying an off -site fee to the District.

Fees reduce emissions by helping to fund clean-air projects in the District. The Revised Project would be required to consult with the SJVAPCD regarding the applica bility of Rule 9510 Indirect Source Review including the fees.

Criteria Pollutant Emissions and Thresholds
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
36 The Revised Project and Original Project’s operational emissions are provided in Table AIR-2 (below) (further detail is provided in Appendix A), in comparison to the SJVAPCD criteria pollutant thresholds. As shown in Table AIR-2, the Revised Project would have fewer emissions for each of the criteria air pollutants. Therefore, the Revised Project is anticipated to generate a net reduction in operational-related emissions as compared with the Original Project ( i.e., as compared with the existing condition).

TABLE AIR-2: PROJECT OPERATIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (TONS/YEAR) Emissions
Type
Original
Project
Emissions Proposed Project
Emissions
Proposed
Project Net
Emissions
Above
Emissions
Anticipated
with Original
Project?
ROG 19.7133 13.6729 -6.0404 N
NOx 18.1799 9.3529 -8.827 N
CO 114.3351 70.8541 -43.481 N
PM10 30.0409 14.6232 -15.4177 N
PM2.5 8.2135 5.8222 -2.3913 N
SOx 0.2550 0.1586 -0.0964 N
Source: CalEEMod, v.2020.4.0
As shown above, the Revised Project would not exceed the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds associated with operational emissions. Therefore, the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact with regard to operational emissions.

Conclusion
The impact conclusion in the EIR f or the Original Project was significant and unavoidable . T he Revised Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan, or to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard based on an analysis of the Revised Project against the SJVAPCD thresholds.

Response AQ-3): Sensitive receptors are those parts of the population that can be severely impacted by air pollution. Sensitive receptors include children, the elderly, and the infirm. Although there are existing residences located to the north, south, and east of the Revised Project site, there are no schools located adjacent to the Revised Project site. The nearest school (Aspire Vincent Shalvey Academy) is located approximately 0.27 miles to the southeast of the Revised Project site, at its closest point.

The impact con clusion in the EIR for the Original Project was significant and unavoidable .

Implementation of the Revised Project would not expose these sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Air emissions would be generated during the construction and operational phases of the Revised Project. The construction phase of the Revised Project would be temporary and short-term, and the implementation of all State, Federal, and SJVAPCD requirements would greatly reduce pollution concentrations generated d uring construction activities. Moreover, as described under Responses a) and b), previously, the Revised Project’s construction and operational -related EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
37 emissions would be below the emissions for the Original Project, thereby generating a net beneficial impact. Overall, the Revised Project would not create a new impact, and would not increase the severity of the original impact on air quality.

Response AQ-4): The Revised Project would not generate objectionable odors. People in the immediate vicinity of construction activities may be subject to temporary odors typically associated with construction activities (diesel exhaust, hot asphalt, etc.). However, any odors generated by construction activities would be minor and would be short and temporary in duration.

Examples of facilities that are known producers of operational odors include: Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Chemical Manufacturing, Sanitary Landfill, Fiberglass Manufacturing, Transfer Station, Painting/Coating Operations (e.g., auto body shops), Co mposting Facility, Food Processing Facility, Petroleum Refinery, Feed Lot/Dairy, Asphalt Batch Plant, and Rendering Plant. If a project would locate receptors and known odor sources in proximity to each other further analysis may be warranted; however, if a project would not locate receptors and known odor sources in proximity to each other, then further analysis is not warranted.

The Revised Project does not include any of the aforementioned uses. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary and minor. Lastly, other emissions are evaluated in responses a-c), as provided above. As such, implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
38 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact BIO-1: Have a
substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact BIO-2: Have a
substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in
local or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or
US Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact BIO-3: Have a
substantial adverse effect on state
or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other
means?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact BIO-4: Interfere
substantially with the movement
of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact BIO-5: Conflict with
any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy
or ordinance?
Less than
Significant
No No No See Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact BIO-6: Conflict with
the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Less than
Significant
No No No No

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to biological resources. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
39 use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site.

The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re-designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re - designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high de nsity residential uses.

The Revised Project Rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The proposed project changes would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to biological resources. The area of disturbance of the Revised Project would not be larger than that analyzed within the Original Project. Additionally, the Revised Project would not result in increased impacts to biological resources compared with the impacts addressed in the Cannery Park EIR.

Additionally, the Revised Project would still be subject to the requirements of the mitigation measures included within the Cannery Park EIR (listed below). These mitigation measures contained within the Cannery Park EIR would still be required and enforced. No new mitigation measures are required for the Revised Project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Impacts on Heritage Oaks
Mitigation Measure 1 : Project improvement plans shall identify the species, location and diameter of existing individual oak trees greater than six inches in diameter at breast height (DBH), including all Valley oak (Quercus lobata), coast live oak (Quercus ag rifolia) and interior live oak (Quercus wis lizenii) trees. Improvement plans shall identify all oak trees meeting the Heritage Tree definition (trunk diameter of 16 inches or greater as measured at twenty-four (24) inches above actual grade). An Arborist’s report shall be submitted with the improvement plans identifying the retention value of all Heritage Trees.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers, and/or successors -1n-1nterest shall be responsible for avoidance of impacts to Heritage Trees, or mitigation of impacts as follows:
a) A permit shall be obtained for any necessary removal of a Heritage Tree, pursuant to the Stockton Heritage Tree Ordinance.
b) Grading of proposed lots that include Heritage Trees to be preserved should be designed to preserve existing grade to the drip line surrounding the Heritage Tree, 1n order to enhance survivability. c) Prior to construction, temporary barriers shall be placed around the drip lines of any Heritage Trees to be preserved that are within 25 feet of any planned grading or construction activity. No storage or operation of any equipment will occur within these barriers. No construction materials or fill will be stockpiled within these barriers, and trespassing will be prohibited.
d) If Heritage Tree removal 1s unavoidable, mitigation in the form of replacement plantings for trees lost shall be provided, consistent with the Stockton Heritage Tree Ordinance and Mitigation Measure 3 below. e) The owners, developer, and/or successors -In-interest shall implement remedial pruning or other recommendations set forth in the Arborist’s report for existing Heritage Trees that wil l be retained so as to preserve the existing tree(s) and protect the general public.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
40 Mitigation Measure 3. Replacement oak trees shall be planted on the same site as removed, if at all possible, otherwise an alternate site shall be selected by the applican t and submitted to the City Parks and Recreation Department tor approval. The size of replacement trees shall be based on the ong1nal tree's retention value (as determined by a certified Arborist retained by the owner/developer as follows:

Retention Value Replacement Oak Size
Low One 15-gallon
Moderate Two 15-gallon
Moderate-high Five 15-gallon
High Eight 15-gallon
Mitigation Measure 4. Where possible, removal of non -heritage oak trees shall also be avoided. If avoidance Is not feasible, replacement oak trees shall be planted.

Mitigation Measure 5. The owners, developers, and/or successors -in-interest shall provide the resources necessary to ensure that the newly planted trees become established in their new location. The owner/developer shall retain the services to a certified Arborist for a period of three years. Site inspections will be made by the Arborist once per week within the first six months of planting and once per month for the remaining thirty months. The Arborist’s function will be to monitor the condition of the newly planted trees and report to the City and owner/developer any trees that are in need of attention or replacement. The owner/developer shall be responsible for purchasing and planting any trees for which replacement may be deemed necessary by the Arborist over the three-year period. Any newly planted trees in need of attention, as so-deemed by the Arborist, shall be properly cared for by the owner/developer until the Arborist finds that they are in satisfactory condition.

Impacts on Wetlands and Waters of the US
Mitigation Measure 1: A wetland delineation shall be conducted and submitted to the Corps of Engineers for verification m order to determine 1urlsdiction.

Mitigation Measure 2. If on -site wetlands are determined to be 1unsdictional, the owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall design the pro1ect to avoid wetland impacts wherever practicable.

Mitigation Measure 3. Where it is not practicable to avoid wetland impacts, the owners, developers and/or successors-in-Interest shall obtain any required permits for stream or wetland encroachment from agencies with 1unsdiction, including the US Army Corps of Engineers, State Reclamation Board, California D epartment of Fish and Game and Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Mitigation Measure 4. The owners, developers and/or successors -In-interest shall provide mitigation for wetland losses as specified in required permits through payment of SJMSCP fees or m itigation bank fees acceptable to the regulatory agencies with jurisdiction.

Impacts on Sensitive Fish and Wildlife Species
Mitigation Measure 1: The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall mitigate for the proportionate loss of potential wildlife habitat from the pro1ect site by paying any required fee, implementing required "take avoidance" measures and taking any other actions required by the adopted San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response BIO-1): The following discussion is based on a background search of special-status species that are documented in the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Inven tory of Rare and Endangered Plants, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
41 Service’s (USFWS) records of listed endangered and threatened species from the IPAC database. The background search was regional in scope and focused on the documented occurrences within 1 mile of the Project site.

Special Status Wildlife Species
Plants: There are no special-status plants that are documented within a 1-mile radius of the Revised Project site. The conditions of the Revised Project site are highly disturbed due to the active agricultural operations and there is very little potential for any vegetation growth outside the agriculturally planted vegetation. Implementation of the individual phases, and the Revised Project as a whole, will have a less than significant impact on special status plants.

Invertebrates: There are three special -status invertebrates that are documented within a 1 -mile radius of the Project site according to the CNDDB including: California linderiella ( Linderiella occidentalis), vernal pool tadpole shrimp ( Lepidurus packardi ) and midvalley fairy shrimp (Branchinecta mesovallensis ). Separately, the Vernal pool fairy shrimp ( Branchinecta lynchi ) and Vernal pool tadpole shrimp ( Lepidurus packardi) are document ed in the USFWS IPAC database as potentially occurring within the region.

California linderiella is not a federal or state listed species. They are commonly found in vernal pools throughout the Central Valley region. The documented occurrence is located along the SR 99 frontage road immediately south of Bear Creek. The record indicates that there were 1,000s of adults observed on March 25, 2009 in an approximate ly 30x15-foot seasonal wetland. This is an area that is not proposed for development under the proposed Project. This area would remain intact and the habitat would not be disturbed.

Vernal pool fairy shrimp (VPFS) is a federal threatened invertebrate found in the Central Valley, central and south Coast Ranges from Tehama County to Santa Barbara Coun ty. They are commonly found in vernal pools and in sandstone rock outcrop pools. VPFS is not anticipated to be directly affected by any individual phase or component of the proposed Project because there in not appropriate vernal pool habitat on the Project site.

Vernal pool tadpole shrimp (VPTS) is a federal endangered invertebrate found in vernal pools and stock ponds from Shasta County south to Merced County. VPTS is not anticipated to be directly affected by any individual phase or component of the prop osed Project because there in not appropriate vernal pool habitat on the Project site.

Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (VELB) is a federal threatened insect, proposed for delisting.

Elderberry (Sambucus sp.), which is a primary host species for VELB. VE LB is not anticipated to be directly affected by the proposed project.

Essential habitat for Molestan blister beetle and Sacramento anthicid beetle is not present on the Revised Project site.

No special-status invertebrates are expected to be affected by the Revised Project. Nevertheless, the Project applicant would be required to seek coverage under the SJMSCP to mitigate habitat impacts to covered special status species. Coverage involves com pensation for habitat impacts on covered species through implementation of incidental take and minimization measures (ITMMs) and payment of fees for conversion of lands that may provide habitat for covered special status species.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
42 These fees are used to pre serve and/or create habitat in preserves to be managed in perpetuity.

Obtaining coverage for a Project includes incidental take authorization (permits) under the Endangered Species Act Section 10(a), California Fish and Game Code Section 2081, and the MBTA .

Coverage under the SJMSCP would fully mitigate all habitat impacts on covered special-status species.

Reptile and amphibian species: There are no special -status amphibians that are documented within a 1 -mile radius of the Revised Project site according t o the CNDDB including: However, the California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytoni) and Giant garter snake (Thamnophis couchi gigas) are documented in the USFWS IPAC database as potentially occurring within the region. There is no essential habitat for any of these species within the Revised Project site.

No special -status reptiles or amphibians are expected to be affected by the Revised Project.

Nevertheless, the Project applicant to seek coverage under the SJMSCP to mitigate habitat impacts to covered special status species. Coverage involves compensation for habitat impacts on covered species through implementation of incidental take and minimization measures (I TMMs) and payment of fees for conversion of lands that may provide habitat for covered special status species.

These fees are used to preserve and/or create habitat in preserves to be managed in perpetuity.

Obtaining coverage for a Project includes inciden tal take authorization (permits) under the Endangered Species Act Section 10(a), California Fish and Game Code Section 2081, and the MBTA.

Coverage under the SJMSCP would fully mitigate all habitat impacts on covered special-status species.

Birds: The only special-status bird that is documented in the CNDDB within a 1 -mile radius of the Project site is Swainson’s Hawk ( Buteo swainsoni). The CNDDB shows three records of Swainson’s hawk nesting in the eastern portion of the Project site. Records were recorde d by Caltrans as early as 1990 and as late as 2002. The records indicate three nest trees including: 1) a valley oak in mixed trees on a demolished farmstead, 2) a 28’ eucalyptus tree, and 3) a 35’ valley oak tree. The surrounding crops were wheat (2003). The breeding pair fledged 3 young in 1990, one in 1991. The nest was active in 1992, but there are no records of fledging. A pair and two young were recorded in 1994. The nest was active in 2000 and 2001, but there are no records of fledging. One fledged in 2003.

Mating, nest building, and nest defense was observed in 2009, although details are not provided in the records beyond these notes. An April 22, 2022 survey was performed to determine if Swainson’s hawk continues to nest in the trees on the Revised Project site. There was no evidence of nesting on the Revised Project site. There was a single adult Swainson’s hawk observed flying over the field.

There were no observations of a second, potential pair to the observed adult individual.

Separately, Aleut ian goose ( Branta canadensis leucopareia ), Yellow -headed blackbird (Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus ), Swainson’s hawk ( Buteo swainsoni ), song sparrow (Modesto population) (Melospiza melodia), Merlin (Falco columbarius), western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis ), burrowing owl ( Athene cunicularia ), Tricolored blackbird ( Agelaius tricolor). In addition, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis), fox sparrow ( Passerella iliaca ), least bittern ( Ixobrychus exilis), lesser yellowlegs ( Tringa flavipes ), Lewis’s woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), long-billed curlew (Numenius americanus), marbeled godwit ( Limosa fedoa), mountain plover ( Charadrius montanus), Nuttalls woodpec ker ( Picoides nuttallii ), oak titmouse ( Baeolophus inornatus ), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus ), short -eared owl ( Asio flammeus ), western grebe (A echmophorus occidentalis ), Williamson’s sapsucker ( Sphyrapicus thyroideus ), and yellow -billed magpie ( Pica nuttalli) are documented in the USFWS IPAC database as potentially occurring within the region. The Project site may provide suitable foraging habitat for a variety of potentially occurring special -status birds, including those listed above. Potential nesting habitat is very limited located within the Project site, EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
43 but may be found in the vicinity. There is also the potential for other special-status birds that do not nest in this region and represent migrants or winter visitants to forage on the Revised Project site.

Year-round birds: Special-status birds that can be present in the region throughout the year include:
bald eagle ( Haliaeetus leucocephalus ), black rail ( Laterallus jamaicensis ), burrowing owl ( Athene cunicularia), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), Nuttalls woodpecker ( Picoides nuttallii), oak titmouse ( Baeolophus inornatus ), song sparrow (Modesto population) ( Melospiza melodia ), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor ), Williamson’s sapsucker ( Sphyrapicus thyroideus), yellow - billed magpie (Pica nuttalli), among others. Some of these species are migratory, but also reside year- round in California.

Summering Birds: Special-status birds that are only present in the region in the spring and summer months inclu de: Aleutian goose ( Branta canadensis leucopareia ), least bittern ( Ixobrychus exilis ), Swainson’s hawk ( Buteo swainsoni ), western yellow -billed cuckoo ( Coccyzus americanus occidentalis), and yellow-billed magpie (Pica nuttalli).

Overwintering Birds: Special-status birds that are only present in the region in the fall and winter months include: fox sparrow ( Passerella iliaca ), lesser yellowlegs ( Tringa flavipes ), Lewis’s woodpecker ( Melanerpes lewis ), long -billed curlew ( Numenius americanus ), marbeled godwi t (Limosa fedoa ), merlin (Falco columbarius ), mountain plover ( Charadrius montanus ), peregrine falcon ( Falco peregrinus ), short -eared owl ( Asio flammeus ), and western grebe (A echmophorus occidentalis).

Nesting Raptors (Birds of Prey): All raptors (owls, hawks, eagles, falcons), including species and their nests, are protected from take pursuant to the Fish and Game Code of California Section 3503.5, and the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, among other federal and State regulations. Special -status raptors that are known to occur in the region include: bald eagle ( Haliaeetus leucocephalus ), burrowing owl ( Athene cunicularia), Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii ), ferruginous hawk (Buteo rega), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), short-eared owl (Asio flammeus), Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni), and white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), among others.

Analysis: The Revised Project site has historical records of Swainson’s hawk nesting in the trees associated with the old farmstead near the SR 99 frontage road. An April 22, 2022 survey was performed to determine if Swainson’s hawk continues to nest in the trees on the Project site. The survey revealed 11 valley oak trees in the area of the old farmstead. This is the area that was previously identified with nesting Swainson’s hawks. There were no eucalyptus trees as referenced in the CNDDB records. It is noted that there are no structures in this area beyond remnants of an old driveway to the old farmstead area. There were also two valley oak trees located on the south side of Bear Creek adjacent to the SR 99 frontage road. There was no evidence of nesting in the valley oak trees.

There was a single adult Swainson’s hawk observed flying over the field. There were no observations of a second, potential pair to the observed adult individual, which means one of two things. It is not paired and nesting this season, or it is foraging in the area for food to bring back to a nest within its foraging radius. Time was spent trying to locate a nest in the general vicinity, but one was not located.

Swainson’s hawk nesting in the region is quite common, and it would be expected that a foragi ng Swainson’s hawk could be foraging as far as 10 miles from a nest, although a nest could also be inside of a mile from the Revised Project site.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
44 The trees, as well as powerlines/poles represent potentially suitable nesting habitat for a variety of special-status birds. Additionally, the agricultural land within the Revised Project site represents potentially suitable nesting habitat for the ground-nesting birds where disturbance is less frequent.

In general, most nesting occurs from late February and ear ly March through late July and early August, depending on various environmental conditions. The CNDDB currently contains nesting records for Swainson's hawk in the vicinity of the Revised Project site. In addition to the species described above, common raptors such may nest in or adjacent to the Revised Project site.

New sources of noise and light during the construction and operational phases of the Revised Project could adversely affect nesters if they are located adjacent to the Revised Project site in any given year.

Additionally, the Revised Project would eliminate the agricultural areas on the Revised Project site, which serve as potential foraging habitat for birds throughout the year. The Revised Project requires participation in the SJMSCP. As part of the SJMSCP, SJCOG requires preconstruction surveys for projects that occur during the avian breeding season (March 1 – August 31). When active nests are identified, the biologists develop buffer zones around the active nests as deemed appropriate until the young have fledged. SJCOG also uses the fees to purchase habitat as compensation for the loss of foraging habitat. Implementation of the proposed project would ensure that potential impacts to special status birds are reduced.

Mammal: No special-status mammals are documented within a 1-mile radius of the Revised Project site.

Riparian (San Joaquin Valley) woodrat and riparian brush rabbit: The Revised Project site does not contain appropriate habitat for riparian (San Joaquin Valley) woodrat and riparian brush rabbit. It is unlikely that the Revised Project site is used by American badger, San Joaquin kit fox, or San Joaquin pocket mouse and these species have not been observed during recent or previous field surveys.

Special-status bats: The Revised Project site provides potential habitat for several special-status bats, including: Greater western mastiff bat ( Eumops perotis californicus ), western red bat ( Lasiurus blossevillii), small -footed myotis/bat ( Myotis ciliolabrum ), long -eared myotis/bat ( Myotis evotis ), fringed myotis/bat ( Myotis thysanodes ), long -legged myotis/bat ( Myotis volans ), and Yuma myotis/bat ( Myotis yumanensis). These species are no t federal, or state listed; however, they are tracked by the CNDDB. Development of the Revised Project site would eliminate foraging habitat for special status bats by removing the agricultural areas. Additionally, special status bats can establish roosts within the structures and/or trees located on the Project site. Bats can establish roosts even when absent in prior years. These special status bat species are covered by the SJMSCP.

Conclusion: The SJMSCP is administered by a Joint Powers Authority consi sting of members of the SJCOG, the CDFW, and the USFWS. According to the SJMSCP, adoption and implementation by local planning jurisdictions provides full compensation and mitigation for impacts to plants, fish and wildlife. Adoption and implementation of the SJMSCP also secures compliance pursuant to the state and federal laws such as CEQA, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Planning and Zoning Law, the State Subdivision Map Act, the Porter -Cologne Act and the Cortese -Knox Act in regard to species covered under the SJMSCP. Applicants pay mitigation fees on a per-acre basis. The entire County is mapped according to these categories so that landowners, project proponents and project reviewers are easily aware of the applicable SJMSCP fees for the proposed development. The appropriate fees are remitted to SJCOG for administration. SJCOG uses the funds to preserve open space land of comparable types throughout the County, often coordinating with other private or public land trusts to purchase conservation easements or buy land outright for preservation. The fees EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
45 are automatically adjusted on an annual basis. The fees have been designed to sufficiently mitigate the impacts of projects on candidate, sensitive, and special status species.

Coverage al so involves implementation of incidental take and minimization Measures (ITMMs), which is intended to ensure avoidance of individual species. Obtaining coverage for a Project serves as an incidental take authorization (permit) under the Endangered Species Act Section 10(a), California Fish and Game Code Section 2081, and the MBTA.

The Revised Project site has already received SJMSCP coverage. SJCOG issued Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMM) for the Original Project on August 11, 2005, and the Appl icant paid the appropriate fees on October 7, 2005. ITMM coverage for the Revised Project site is for the physical development rather than the type of use, therefore, the ITMMs coverage remains in effect for the parcels that are proposing to change the land use.

No special -status species are expected to be affected by the Revised Project, especially with the implementation of ITMMs. The Project applicant to implement the ITMMs issued for the Project site by SJCOG. Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Responses BIO-2): There is no riparian habitat on the Project site. The Project site does not include the immediate area surrounding Bear Creek. The CNDDB record search did not reveal the occurrence of any sensitive habits within 1 mile of the Project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on riparian habitats or natural communities.

Response BIO-3): Bear Creek is an anthropogenica lly modified riverine system that generally bisects the Project site. Bear Creek conducts base flow and storm runoff from its upstream drainage area, which includes foothill and lowland agricultural areas north and east of the Project site. Bear Creek is also used to distribute irrigation water. Outside the Stockton urban area, Bear Creek drains more than 92 square miles in eastern San Joaquin and western Calaveras counties. Bear Creek contains levees on the north and south side of the channel, and it is used as a flood control facility as it crosses through the incorporated City of Stockton. Bear Creek is a jurisdictional area given that it is a tributary to the San Joaquin River, a Traditional Navigable Water. However, Bear Creek is within a swath of land that is a gap that will not be developed or disturbed by the proposed Project.

There is also a seasonal wetland located just west of the SR 99 frontage road, and south of Bear Creek that is also part of the swath of land bisecting the Project site that will not be developed. These areas will remain intact and no fill activities warranting a permit are necessary.

The agricultural irrigation ditches along the boundaries of some of the fields are man-made isolated facilities with the sole purpose of agricultural irrigation. These ditches are exempt from permitting.

Absent any fill activities in wetlands or jurisdictional waters, implementation of the proposed Project would have less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Response BIO-4): The CNDDB r ecord search did not reveal any documented wildlife corridors or wildlife nursery sites on or adjacent to the Project site. Bear Creek, however, naturally serves as an open corridor for wildlife to move through the area. This area will not be disturbed, as it is part of the gap bisecting the Project site.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
46 Special status fish species documented within the region include: Delta smelt ( Hypomesus transpacificus), Hardhead ( Mylopharodon conocephalus ), Central Valley steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss), Central Valley fall- /late fall-run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), and Longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys). The closest major natural movement corridor for native fish that are documented in the region is the San Joaquin River, located to the west of the Project site. Bear Creek is a tributary to the San Joaquin River; however, there will be no disturbance to Bear Creek.

The ongoing operational phase of the proposed Project requires discharge of stormwater into the municipal storm drainage system, whic h ultimately discharges into the Delta. The discharge of stormwater could result in indirect impacts to special status fish and wildlife if stormwater was not appropriately treated through BMPs prior to its discharge to the Delta. The Stockton Municipal Code establishes minimum storm water management requirements and controls. Storm water drainage is managed through the implementation of BMPs to the extent they are technologically achievable to prevent and reduce pollutants. The City requires reasonable protection from accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes into the municipal storm drain system or watercourses. The management of water quality through BMPs is intended to ensure that water quality does not degrade to levels that would int erfere or impede fish or wildlife. Implementation of these required measures would ensure that this potential impact is reduced to a less than significant level.

Responses BIO-5): The proposed Project is subject to the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). The proposed Project does not conflict with the SJMSCP.

Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Responses BIO-6): The Land Use and Safety Elements of t he General Plan establish numerous policies and implementation measures related to biological resources as listed below:

Land Use Element Policies
LU-5.2. Protect natural resource areas, fish and wildlife habitat, scenic areas, open space areas, agricultural lands, parks, and other cultural/historic resources from encroachment or destruction by incompatible development.
o Consistent: There are no known cultural or historic resources on site which would be encroached on or destroyed by the proposed Project. Nevertheless, Section V, Cultural and Tribal Resources includes mitigation measures to be followed should cultural resources be f ound on -site during construction. Additionally, the City has initiated Tribal Consultation, which includes a 90-day period for tribal organizations to comment and request formal consultation. Natural resources areas, habitat, and agricultural lands are found on-site. Further, the proposed Project would be subject to the City and County Right-to-Farm ordinances, which would ensure that the proposed Project does not encroach or destroy agricultural operations in the area.

LU-5.3. Define discrete and clear city edges that preserve agriculture, open space, and scenic views. o Consistent: The Project site is located in the northern portion of the City adjacent to SR 99. The site was anticipated for development as part of the City’s General Plan, and as part of the Original Project. As discussed in Section II, Agricultural Resources, the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan EIR anticipated development of the Project site as part of the overall evaluation of the buildout of the City.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
47 Safety Element Policy
SAF-2.3. Protect the community from potential flood events. o Consistent: Impacts associated with potential flood events are discussed in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality. All Potential flood impacts would be less than significant.

Municipal Code
The Stockton Munic ipal Code, Title 16 Development Code protects Heritage Oak Trees through permit requirements. Section 16.130.020 provides the Director with Review Authority for permits to remove heritage trees. The decision of the Director is subject to an appeal to the Council in compliance with Chapter 16.100 (Appeals). (Ord. 015 -09 C.S., eff. 12 -3-09). Section 16.130.030 provides the permit requirements, and describes the process for approval or denial of a permit application. Section 16.130.040 establishes fines for violation of this requirement. Section

16.130.050 provides exemptions under emergencies. Section 16.130.060 establishes the replacement requirements.

SJMSCP
The proposed Project is subject to the SJMSCP. The proposed Project does not conflict with the SJMSCP.

Heritage Tree Permit
The proposed Project would involve extensive grading and disturbance of the Project site as construction proceeds, and proposed land uses would likely involve removal of all of the existing vegetation, including 11 oak trees located along the eastern portion of the Project site within the old farmstead. While it is assumed that all 11 oak trees around the old farmstead will require removal, it may be possible for the engineer to incorporate some of the trees into the yard of a proposed lot(s).

The two oak trees near Bear Creek are not proposed to be removed.

The City controls Heritage Tree impacts through existing regulations in Chapter 16.130, Heritage Tree Permit, of the City of Stockton Municipal Code. Any removal of Heritage oak trees will require a permit under the specific provisions of the Chapter 16.130, Heritage Tree Permit, of the City of Stockton Municipal Code. If removal of the Heritage Trees is permitted, mitigation in the form of replacement tree plantings will be required, as specified in the Municipal Code. In addition, the Cannery Park MMRP includes five mitigation measure specifically aimed at mitigat ing the loss of Heritage Trees. Those measures are presented at the beginning of this section (Section 3.4 Biological Resources). Consistency with the existing ordinance protecting Heritage Trees, as well as the adopted Cannery Park MMRP, will ensure that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
48 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
49 This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
50 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
51 This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
52 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Environmental
Issue Area
Conclusion in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact CLT-1:

Cause a substantial
adverse change in
the significance of
a historical
resource pursuant
to Section15064.5?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact CLT-2:

Cause a substantial
adverse change in
the significance of
an archaeological
resource pursuant
to Section
15064.5?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact CLT-3:

Disturb any human
remains, including
those interred
outside of formal
cemeteries?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to cultural resources.

The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.8 8-acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high densi ty residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed for distur bance would not change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. As such, no changes to potential impacts to cultural resources would occur as a result of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Cannery Park EIR mitigation measures (listed below), which includes standard measures that must be implemented if a previously unknown cultural or historical resource is encountered during site grading and construction activities. These mitigation measures would be required by the project revisions and would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
53 Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR Prehistoric Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure 1. If any subsurface cultural resources, including either prehistoric or historic resources, are encountered during construction of the residential project, all construction activities in the vicinity of the encounter shall be halted until a qualified archaeologist can examine these materials and make a determination of their significance. The City of Stockton Community Development Department shall be notified, and the owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall be responsible for mitigation of any significant cultural resources pursuant to the CEOA Guidelines.

Mitigation Measure 2. If human remains are encountered at any time during the development of the project, all work in the vicinity of the find shall halt and the County Coroner and the Community Development Department shall be notified immediately. If it is determined that the remains are those of a Native American, the Coroner must contact the Native American Heritage Commission. At the same time, a qualified archaeologist must be contacted to evaluate the archaeological implications of the finds. The CEQA Guidelines detail steps to be taken when human remains are found to be of Native American origin.

Mitigation Measure 3. In order to ensure proper identification of any cultural materials that might inadvertently be encountered during future development or construction activity, the C ity's use permit should include a provision for training of field personnel in identification procedures, prior to implementing construction work. The training would take the form of a two -hour seminar in which a professional archaeologist would review wit h equipment operators the natural and cultural history of the project area, archeological sensitivity, the most likely locations of buried cultural materials, and what kinds of cultural materials would be seen if prehistoric materials are in fact unearthed. The seminar would conclude with specific instruction on how to address such discoveries and what immediate actions to take, particularly if human remains are found.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses CLT-1)-CLT3): The proposed Project is within the same footprint of the Original Project.

As described in the EIR for the Original Project, a search of existing records at the Central California Information Center, consultation with Native Americans, and consultation with the Haggin Museum failed to identify information concerning prehistoric (or historic-period) sites or features within the Original Project site, in spite of some previous surveys of sensitive areas along Bear Creek. The Native American Heritage Commission did not identify any sacred land listings for this area, and no prehistoric or historic resources were identified during the field survey of the Original Project site.

Additionally, the City has initiated a new Tribal Consultation, which includes a 90-day period for tribal organizations to comment and request formal consultation on the proposed Project. Proposed Project disturbance of the Project site is not expected to result in a significant effect on prehistoric cultural resources.

However, as with most projects in the region that involve ground -disturbing activities, there is the potential for discovery of a previously unknown archaeological resources and cultural resources, including prehistoric or historic artifacts. With implementation of the mitigation measures contained within the Canner y Park EIR, the potential impact would be less than significant with respect to cultural resources.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
54 3.6 ENERGY
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact ENERGY-1:

Result in potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or
unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or
operation?
N/A No No No No
Impact ENERGY-2:

Conflict with or obstruct
a state or local plan for
renewable energy or
energy efficiency?
N/A No No No No
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to energy. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek f or low density residential uses, 2) re-designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

As provided in the below analysis, the Revised Project would use less operational electricity, less operational fuel usage for vehicles, and less on - and off-road construction vehicle fuel, compared to the Original Project. However, as provided in Table EN ERGY-1 and Table ENERGY -2, below, the Original Project’s operational natural gas usage is anticipated to be greater than the Revised Project’s operational natural gas usage, due to the differences in land uses between the Original Project and the Revised Project. Nevertheless, the Revised Project would use less energy overall, when compared to the Original Project, as described in further detail (under responses a-b), below.

Overall, the Revised Project would not result in any significant adverse impacts r elated to project energy requirements, energy use inefficiencies, and/or the energy intensiveness of materials by amount and fuel type for each stage of the Revised Project including construction, operations, maintenance, and/or removal. The Revised Project would comply with all existing energy standards, including those established by the City of Stockton, and would not result in significant adverse EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
55 impacts on energy resources. As such, no changes to potential impacts to energy impacts would occur as a res ult of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response ENERGY-1 – ENERGY 2 ): The State CEQA Guidelines require consideration of the potentially significant energy implications of a project. CEQA requires mitigation measures to reduce “wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary” energy usage (Public Resources Code Section 21100, subdivision [b][3]). The means to achieve the goal of conserving energy include decreasing overall energy consumption, decreasing reliance on natural gas and oil, and increasing reliance on renewable energy sources. In particular, the proposed Project would be con sidered “wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary” if it were to violate state and federal energy standards and/or result in significant adverse impacts related to project energy requirements, energy inefficiencies, energy intensiveness of materials, cause s ignificant impacts on local and regional energy supplies or generate requirements for additional capacity, fail to comply with existing energy standards, otherwise result in significant adverse impacts on energy resources, or conflict or create an inconsis tency with applicable plan, policy, or regulation.

The Revised Project includes the construction of residential and commercial uses. The amount of energy used at the Revised Project site would directly correlate to the size and type of the proposed buildings, the energy consumption of associated unit appliances, and outdoor lighting. Other major sources of Revised Project energy consumption include fuel used by vehicle trips generated during Revised Project construction and operation, and fuel used by off -road construction vehicles during construction.

The following discussion provides calculated levels of energy use expected for both the Original Project as well as the Revised Project, based on commonly used modelling software (i.e., CalEEMod v.2020.4.0 an d the California Air Resource Board’s EMFAC2021), to serve as a comparison. The modeling results show that the electricity consumption of the Original Project would exceed the Revised Project’s electricity consumption. However, the natural gas consumption of the Revised Project would exceed the Original Project’s natural gas consumption.

Electricity and Natural Gas
Electricity and natural gas used by the Revised Project would be used primarily to power on -site buildings. Total annual electricity (kWh) and natural gas (kBTU) usage associated with the operation of the Original Project is shown in Table ENERGY-1, and for the Revised Project in Table ENERGY-2, below (as provided by CalEEMod). The Revised Project incorporates feasible mitigation to reduce the Revised Project’s operational electricity and natural gas consumption.

According to Calico’s Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod , CalEEMod uses the Cali fornia Commercial End Use Survey (CEUS) database to develop energy intensity value for non -residential buildings. The energy use from residential land uses is calculated based on the Residential Appliance Saturation Survey (RASS). Similar to CEUS, this is a comprehensive energy use assessment that includes the end use for various climate zones in California.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
56 Table ENERGY-1: Original Project Operational Natural Gas and Electricity Usage Emissions(a) Natural Gas (kBTU/year) Electricity (kWh/year) High Density Residential 3,147,220 1,104,840
Commercial 13,409,100 13,165,900
Total 16,556,320 14,270,740
NOTE: (A) NUMBERS PROVIDED HERE MAY NOT ADD UP EXACTLY TO TOTAL DUE TO ROUNDING.

SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0).

Table ENERGY-2: Revised Project Operational Natural Gas and Electricity Usage Emissions(a) Natural Gas (kBTU/year) Electricity (kWh/year) Condo/Townhouse 5,586,110 1,443,370
Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps 111,168 109,152
Fast Food Restaurant with
Drive Thru 2,594,438 730,660
General Office Building 166,260 98,532
Hotel 4,264,610 1,034,720
Medical Office Building 159,740 94,668
Parking Lot - 8,279
Quality Restaurant 654,060 184,200
Regional Shopping Center 17,370 17,055
Single Family Housing 7,594,480 2,538,270
Total 21,148,236 6,258,906
NOTE: (A) NUMBERS PROVIDED HERE MAY NOT ADD UP EXACTLY TO TOTAL DUE TO ROUNDING.

SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0).

As shown in Table ENERGY -1 and Table ENERGY -2, the Original Project’s operational natural gas usage would be less than the Revised Project’s operational natural gas usage, although the Original Project’s operational electricity usage would be greater than the Revised Project’s operational electricity usage. The Revised Project would include installation of Energy Star appliances (consistent with the requir ements under the current version of California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards), and compliance with the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (as contained in the California Code of Regulations).

On-Road Vehicles (Operation)
The Original Project and the Revised Project would generate vehicle trips during their operational phases.

Original Project
Using fleet mix data provided by CalEEMod (v2020.4.0), and Year 2030 gasoline and diesel MPG (miles per gallon) factors for individual vehicle classes as provided by EMFAC2021, De Novo derived weighted MPG factors for operational on -road vehicles of approx imately 29.0 MPG for gasoline vehicles. With this information, De Novo calculated as a conservative estimate that the Original Project (without mitigation incorporated) would generate vehicle trips that would use a total of approximately 7,119 gallons of gasoline fuel per day, on average, or 2,598,340 gallons of fuel per year.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
57 Revised Project
Using fleet mix data provide by CalEEMod (v2020.4.0), and Year 2030 gasoline and diesel MPG (miles per gallon) factors for individual vehicle classes as provided by E MFAC2021, De Novo derived weighted MPG factors for operational on -road vehicles of approximately 29.0 MPG for gasoline vehicles. With this information, De Novo calculated as a conservative estimate that the Revised Project (without mitigation incorporated) would generate vehicle trips that would use a total of approximately 2,870 gallons of gasoline fuel per day, on average, or 1,046,637 gallons of fuel per year.

On-Road Vehicles (Construction)
The Original Project and the Revised Project would also generate on-road vehicle trips during project construction (from construction workers, vendors, and haulers). The Revised Project site is essentially flat, and it is anticipated that the Revised Project site can be balanced on site, mean ing that there would be limited to no cut and fill (i.e., import/export).). Estimates of vehicle fuel consumed were derived based on the assumed construction schedule, vehicle trip lengths and number of workers per construction phase as provided by CalEEMo d, and Year 2022 gasoline MPG factors provided by EMFAC2021. For the purposes of simplicity, it was assumed that all vehicles used gasoline as a fuel source (as opposed to diesel fuel or alternative sources).

Original Project
Table ENERGY-3, below, describes Original Project’s gasoline and diesel fuel used by on-road mobile sources during each phase of the construction schedule. As shown, the vast majority of on -road mobile vehicle fuel used during the construction of the Original Project would occur durin g the building construction phase.

Table ENERGY -3: Original Project - On-Road Mobile Fuel Generated by Project Construction Activities – By Phase
Construction
Phase
# of
Days
Total Daily
Worker
Trips(a)
Total Daily
Vendor
Trips(a)
Total
Hauling
Trips(a)
Gallons of
Gasoline
Fuel(b)
Gallons of
Diesel
Fuel(b)
Site Preparation 60 18 - - 457 -
Grading 155 20 - - 1,311 -
Building
Construction 1550 565 219 - 18,519 22,554
Paving 110 15 - - 698 -
Architectural
Coating 110 113 - - 263 -
Total N/A N/A N/A N/A 21,248 22,554
NOTE: (A) PROVIDED BY CALEEMOD. (B)SEE APPENDIX A FOR FURTHER DETAIL SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0); EMFAC2021.

Revised Project
Table ENERGY-4, below, describes Revised Project’s gasoline and diesel fuel used by on-road mobile sources during each phase of the construction schedule. As shown, the vast majority of on -road EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
58 mobile vehicle fuel used during the construction of the Revised Project would occur during the building construction phase.

Table ENERGY -4: Revised Project - On-Road Mobile Fuel Generated by Project Construction Activities – By Phase
Construction
Phase
# of
Days
Total Daily
Worker
Trips(a)
Total Daily
Vendor
Trips(a)
Total
Hauling
Trips(a)
Gallons of
Gasoline
Fuel(b)
Gallons of
Diesel
Fuel(b)
Site Preparation 60 18 - - 457 -
Grading 155 20 - - 1,311 -
Building
Construction 1550 431 107 - 14,127 11,019
Paving 110 15 - - 698 -
Architectural
Coating 110 86 - - 200 -
Total N/A N/A N/A N/A 16,793 11,019
NOTE: (A) PROVIDED BY CALEEMOD. (B)SEE APPENDIX A FOR FURTHER DETAIL SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0); EMFAC2021.

Off-Road Vehicles (Construction)
Off-road construction vehicles would use diesel fuel during the construction phase. A non-exhaustive list of off -road constructive vehicles expected to be used during the construction phase of the proposed Project includes: cranes, forklifts, generator sets, tractors, excavators, and dozers. Based on the total amount of CO 2 emissions expected to be generated by the Revised Project (as provided by the CalEEMod output), and a CO 2 to diesel fuel conversion factor (provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration), the Original Project would use up to a total of approximat ely 97,189 gallons of diesel fuel for off -road construction vehicles (during the site preparation and grading phases of the Original Project). The Revised Project would use up to a total of approximately 96,506 gallons of diesel fuel for off -road construct ion vehicles (during the site preparation and grading phases of the proposed Project). Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix A.

Other
Both the Original Project and the Revised Project landscape maintenance activities would generally require the use of fossil fuel (i.e., gasoline) energy. For example, lawn mowers require the use of fuel for power. As an approximation, it is estimated that landscape care maintenance could require approximately eight individuals one full day per week, or 3,288 hours per year. Assuming an average of approximately 0.5 gallons of gasoline used per person-hour, the Revised Project would require the use of approximately 1,664 gallons of gasoline per year to power landscape maintenance equipment.

The energy used to power landscape maintenance equipment would not differ substantially from the energy required for landscape maintenance for similar project.

The Original Project and the Revised Project could also use other sources of energy not identified here. Examples of other energy sources include alternative and/or renewable energy (such as solar PV) and/or on -site stationary sources (such as on -site natural gas generators) for electricity generation. In particular, the Revised Project residences would be required to install on-site solar PV, consistent with the latest State requirements.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
59 Conclusion
The Revised Project would use energy resources for the operation of project buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on -road vehicle trips (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel) gener ated by the Revised Project, and from off -road construction activities associated with the Revised Project (e.g., diesel fuel). Each of these activities would require the use of energy resources. The Revised Project would be responsible for conserving energy, to the extent feasible, and relies heavily on reducing per capita energy consumption to achieve this goal, including through Statewide and local measures.

The Revised Project would be in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations regulating energy usage. For example, PG&E is responsible for the mix of energy resources used to provide electricity for its customers, and it is in the process of implementing the Statewide Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to increase the proportion of renewable energy (e.g., solar and wind) within its energy portfolio. PG&E has already achieved greater than a 33% mix of renewable energy resources in 2020, and is on track to achieve a minimum of a 50% mix of renewable energy resources by 2030. Additionally, energy -saving regulations, including the latest State Title 24 building energy efficiency standards (“part 6”), would be applicable to the proposed project. Other statewide measures, including those intended to improve the energy efficiency of the statewide passenger and heavy-duty truck vehicle fleet (e.g., the Pavley Bill and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard) are improving vehicle fuel economies, thereby conserving gasoline and diesel fuel. These energy savings would continue to accrue over time.

As a result, the Revised Project would not result in any significant adverse impacts related to project energy requirements, energy use inefficiencies, and/or the energy intensiveness of materials by amount and fuel type for each stage of the Revised Project including construction, operations, maintenance, and/or removal. PG&E, the electricity and natural gas provider to the Revised Project site, maintains sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project. The proposed Project would comply with all existing energy standards, including those established by the City of Stockton, and would not result in significant adverse impacts on energy resources. Therefore, the Revised Project would not be expected cause an inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy resources nor cause a significant impact on any of the threshold as described by Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. This is a less than significant impact.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
60 3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact Geo-1: Rupture of a
known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication

42. Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact Geo-2:Strong seismic
ground shaking?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact Geo-3:Seismic-
related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact Geo-4:Landslides? Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact Geo-5:Result in
substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact Geo-6:Be located on
a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of
the project, and potentially
result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact Geo-7:Be located on
expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact Geo-8:Have soils
incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic
tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where
sewers are not available for
the disposal of waste water?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact Geo-9:Directly or
indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic
feature?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
61 Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to geology and soils.

The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce resident ial uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential lan d located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed for disturbance would not change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. As such, no changes to po tential impacts to geology and soils would occur as a result of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Cannery Park EIR geology and soi ls mitigation measure (listed below), which requires a licensed geotechnical or soils engineer to prepare a report for the project site prior to any building permits .

This mitigation measure would be required by the project revisions and would reduce poten tial impacts to a less than significant level, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Soil Constraints
Mitigation Measure 1. The owner s, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall have a licensed geotechnical or soils engineer prepare a soil report for the project site prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report shall identify engineering limitations of the site soils a nd recommend measures to ensure that planned improvements will not be damaged by these limitations.

Mitigation Measure 2. Subdivision improvements and future industrial, commercial and residential development shall conform to applicable specifications of the soils report.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses GEO-1, GEO -2, GEO -4): The Revised Project site is not located within a currently designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, and known surface expression of active faults does not exist within the Revised Project site. However, the Revised Project site is located within a seismically active region. The U.S. Geological Survey identifies the potential seismic source within

32.2 kilometers (20 miles) of the Project site. Three of the closest known faults classified as active by the California Geological Survey include the Vernalis Fault east of the Tracy, the San Joaquin Fault southeast of Tracy, and the Great Valley Thrust Fault System south of Tracy. Other faults that could potentially affect the proposed Project include the Midway Fault, the Midland Fault, the Black Butte Fault, Corral Hollow-Carnegie Fault, the Greenville Fault, and the Foothills Fault System.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
62 Geologic Hazards
Potential seismic hazards resulting from a nearby moderate to major earthquake could generally be classified as primary and secondary. The primary seismic hazard is ground rupture, also called surface faulting. The common secondary seismic hazards include ground shaking and ground lurching.

Ground Rupture
Figure 15 shows earthquake maps near the Revised Project site. The property does not have known active faults crossing the Revised Project site, and the Revised Project site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Special Study Zone. Because no faults are located on the Project site, the potential for ground rupture (cracking or breaking of the ground duri ng an earthquake) would be less than significant.

Ground Shaking
According to the California Geological Survey’s Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Program, Stockton is considered to be within an area that is predicted to have a 10 percent probability that a seismic event would produce horizontal ground shaking of 10 to 20 percent within a 50-year period.

This level of ground shaking correlates to a Modified Mercalli intensity of V to VII, light to strong. As a result of these factors the California Ge ological Survey has defined the entire county as a seismic hazard zone. The Uniform Building Code places all of California in the zone of greatest earthquake severity because recent studies indicate high potential for severe ground shaking.

To reduce the impact of seismic ground shaking on the development, the Revised Project would be required to be constructed using standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques of the California Building Code. Seismic design provisions of current building code s generally prescribe minimum lateral forces, applied statically to the structure, combined with the gravity forces of dead- and-live loads. The code -prescribed lateral forces are generally considered to be substantially smaller than the comparable forces t hat would be associated with a major earthquake. Therefore, structures would be able to: (1) resist minor earthquakes without damage, (2) resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage but with some nonstructural damage, and (3) resist major earthquakes without collapse but with some structural as well as nonstructural damage.

In order to minimize potential damage to the buildings and site improvements, all construction in California is required to be designed in accordance with the latest seismic de sign standards of the California Building Code. The California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16 addresses structural design and Chapter 18 addresses soils and foundations. Collectively, these state requirements, which have been adopted by the Ci ty of Stockton, include design standards and requirements that are intended to minimize impacts to structures in seismically active areas of California. Section 1613 specifically provides structural design standards for earthquake loads.

Section 1803.5.11 and 1803.5.12 provide requirements for geotechnical investigations for structures assigned varying Seismic Design Categories in accordance with Section 1613. Additionally, the City of Stockton has adopted Design and Construction Standards and incorporated numerous policies relative to seismicity to ensure the health and safety of all people. Design in accordance with these standards and policies would reduce any potential impact to a less than significant level.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
63 Landslides
The Revised Project site is not susceptible to landslides because the area is essentially flat. Some limited potential for slope instability risk could arise during grading and construction activities, where slopes could be over -steepened. However, this risk is mitig ated by adhering to relevant California Building Code requirements . Additionally, according to the CGS Information Warehouse:

Regulatory Maps, the site is not located within a Landslide and Liquefication Zone. This is a less than significant impact.

Conclusion
In order to minimize potential damage to the buildings and site improvements, all construction in California is required to be designed in accordance with the latest seismic design standards of the California Building Code. The California Buildin g Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16 addresses structural design and Chapter 18 addresses soils and foundations. Collectively, these state requirements, which have been adopted by the City of Stockton, include design standards and requirements that are int ended to minimize impacts to structures in seismically active areas of California. Section 1613 specifically provides structural design standards for earthquake loads.

Section 1803.5.11 and 1803.5.12 provide requirements for geotechnical investigations for structures assigned varying Seismic Design Categories in accordance with Section 1613. Additionally, the City of Stockton has adopted Design and Construction Standards and incorporated numerous policies relative to seismicity to ensure the health and safe ty of all people. Design in accordance with these standards and policies would reduce any potential impact to a less than significant level. Because all development in the Project site must be designed in conformance with these state and local standards and policies, any potential impact would be considered less than significant.

Responses GEO-3, GEO-6, GEO-7):

Liquefaction
The Revised Project site is relatively flat and, to date, the Seismic Hazards Zonation Program of the CGS has not identified any seismically-induced liquefaction or landslide zones in the City of Stockton, including the Project site. Furthermore, the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Update EIR identifies the Stockton Planning Area, including the Project site, is at low risk for liquef action and landslides. Therefore, the probability of a landslide or liquefication on the Project sites is low.

Lateral Spreading
Lateral spreading typically occurs on the surface of a slope and is oftentimes directly associated with areas of liquefaction. The Project site is relatively flat and there are no slopes on -site or within the surrounding area. Further, the Project site is not located within an area identified as having the potential for liquefaction. According to the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Update EIR, the Stockton Planning Area does not appear to be located atop unstable geologic materials that are prone to lateral spreading. Therefore, the potential for lateral spreading at the Revised Project site is also low.

Collapsible Soils
Collapsible soils or soil collapse occurs when any unsaturated soils go through a radical rearrangement of particles and greatly decreases in volume upon wetting, additional loading, or both.

Collapsible soils occur predominantly at the base of mountain ranges, where Holocene-age alluvial EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
64 fan and wash sediments have been deposited during rapid run-off events. As stated, the Project site is relatively flat and is located in the valley floor away from the bases of mountain ranges. Further, collapsible soils have not been identified as an issue in the Stockton area. According to the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Update EIR, the Stockton Planning Area does not appear to be located atop unstable geologic materials that are prone to collapsible soils. Therefore, the potential for soil collapse at the Revised Project site is also low.

Subsidence
Land subsidence is the gradual settling or sinking of an area with little or no horizontal motion due to changes taking place underground. It is a natural process, although it can also occur (and is greatly accelerated) as a result of human activities. Subsidence has not been identified as an issue in the Stockton area. According to the Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Update EIR, the Stockton Planning Area does not appea r to be located atop unstable geologic materials that are prone to subsidence. Therefore, the potential for subsidence at the Revised Project site is also low.

Expansive Soils
Expansive soils are those that undergo volume changes as moisture content fluctuates; swelling substantially when wet or shrinking when dry. Soil expansion can damage structures by cracking foundations, causing settlement and distorting structural elements. Expansion is a typical characteristic of certain varieties of clay-type soils. Expansive soils shrink and swell in volume during changes in moisture content, such as a result of seasonal rain events, and can cause damage to foundations, concrete slabs, roadway improvements, and pavement sections.

According to the NRCS Web Soil Survey, as shown in Figure 16, the soils in the Revised Project site have a high shrink-swell potential (due to their clayey composition). Therefore, measures to reduce potentially significant impacts related to expansive site soils would be necessary.

The California Building Code Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 18, Section 1803.1.1.2 requires specific geotechnical evaluation when a preliminary geotechnical evaluation determines that expansive or other special soil conditions are present, which, if not corrected, would lead to structural defects. The City of Stockton also requires a final geotechnical evaluation to be performed at a design -level to ensure that the foundations, structures, roadway sections, sidewalks, and other improvements can accommodate the spe cific soils, including expansive soils, at those locations. Mitigation Measure GEO-1, presented below, provides the requirement for a final geotechnical evaluation in accordance with the standards and requirements outlined in the California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16, Chapter 17, and Chapter 18, which addresses structural design, tests and inspections, and soils and foundation standards. The final geotechnical evaluation would include design recommendations to ensure that soil conditions do not pose a threat to the health and safety of people or structures. The grading and improvement plans, as well as the storm drainage and building plans, are required to be designed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the final geotechnical evaluation.

Conclusion
With the implementation of mitigation measure contained within the Cannery Park EIR, the proposed Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Response GEO-5): The potential for erosion generally increases as a result of human activity, primarily through the development of facilities and impervious surfaces and the removal of EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
65 vegetative cover; thus, there is the potential for erosion associated with construction activities or through the operational phase of a project.

The Revised Project site contains high clay content surface soils; therefore, the Project site would potentially be subject to water erosion. However, because the Project site is essentially flat, the erosion potential is slight. Regardless of the potential for erosio n, there is always the potential for human caused erosion associated with construction activities or through the operational phase of a project. However, grading, excavation, removal of vegetation cover, and loading activities associated with construction activities could temporarily increase runoff, erosion, and sedimentation.

Construction activities also could result in soil compaction and wind erosion effects that could adversely affect soils and reduce the revegetation potential at construction sites an d staging areas.

Additionally, there is the potential for erosion associated with stormwater runoff throughout the operational phase of the Revised Project. The potential for erosion is associated with the design of the improvements, structures, and landscaping.

The Revised Project would be subject to the provisions of the City’s Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance (Chapter 15.48 of the Stockton Municipal Code). The purpose of this Ordinance includes the regulation of grading activity on all property wit hin the City of Stockton that results in the excavation of 50 cubic yards of soil. The Ordinance establish requirements for clearing and grubbing, grading, filling and excavation of land to minimize damage to surrounding property, public right-of- way, and degradation of water quality; controlling the discharge of sediments and pollutant turnoff from construction related activities to municipal separate storm drains; and reducing pollutants in stormwater discharges to the maximum extent practicable. Complian ce with all applicable erosion control measures outlined in the City’s Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance would assist in minimizing any impacts related to top soil erosion.

Additionally, in accordance with the NPDES Stormwater Program, projects in California must prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) containing Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce erosion and sediments to meet water quality standards. Such BMPs may include: temporary erosion control measures such as silt fences, staked straw bales/wattles, silt/sediment basins and traps, check dams, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary revegetation or other ground cover. The BMPs and overall SWPPP is reviewed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board as part of the permitting process. The Revised Project would be required an approved SWPPP for the Revised Project designed to control erosion and the loss of topsoil to the extent practicable using BMPs that the RWQCB has deemed effective in controlling erosion, sedimentation, ru noff during construction activities. The RWQCB has stated that these erosion control measures are only examples of what should be considered and should not preclude new or innovative approaches currently available or being developed. The specific controls are subject to the review and approval by the RWQCB and are existing regulatory requirements.

Overall, compliance with the City’s Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance and mitigation measures provided in the Cannery Park EIR, would ensure that the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Response GEO-8): The Revised Project has been designed to connect to the existing City sewer system and septic systems will not be used. Therefore, no impact would occur related to soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
66 Response GEO-9): The Revised Project site is the same physical site that was evaluated for cultural resources, including paleontological resources, as part of the EIR for the Original Project. The EIR found that development would not d irectly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological re source or site or unique geologic feature. There is no record of paleontological resources or sites located on the Revised Project site. Additionally, unique geologic features are not located on the Revised Project site. This is a less than significant impact.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
67 This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
68 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
69 This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
70 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
71 This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
72 3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Environmental
Issue Area
Conclusion in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact GHG-1:

Generate
greenhouse gas
emissions, either
directly or
indirectly, that
may have a
significant impact
on the
environment?
N/A No No No No
Impact GHG-2:

Conflict with an
applicable plan,
policy or
regulation
adopted for the
purpose of
reducing the
emissions of
greenhouse
gasses?
N/A No No No No
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to greenhouse gases.

The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce resident ial uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential lan d located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The Revised Project would result in reduced impacts to greenhouses gases compared with the impacts associated with the Original Project . Although greenhouse gases wer e not analyzed in the Original Project EIR, since greenhouse gases were not a required topic when the Original Project EIR was published, Table GHG-1 and Table GHG-3 show the Original Project construction and operational emissions (respectively). Table GHG-2 and Table GHG-4 show the Revised Project construction and operational emissions (respectively). As shown below (see Table GHG-1 through Table GHG-4, below, for detail), the Revised Project would generate a net decrease relative to GHG emissions compared to the Original Project. Therefore, no new mitigation measures are required for the Revised Project.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
73 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses GHG-1 – GHG-2): The SJVAPCD has evaluated different approaches for estimating impacts, and summarizing potential GHG emission reduction measures. The SJVAPCD staff has concluded that “existing science is inadequate to support quantification of impacts that project specific GHG emissions have on global climatic change .” This is readi ly understood when one considers that global climatic change is the result of the sum total of GHG emissions, both man -made and natural that occurred in the past; that is occurring now; and will occur in the future. The effects of project specific GHG emis sions are cumulative, and unless reduced or mitigated, their incremental contribution to global climatic change could be considered significant.

The Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (SJVAPCD, 2015) provides an approach to assessing a project’s impacts on greenhouse gas emissions by evaluating the Revised Project’s emissions to the “reduction targets” established in ARB’s AB 32 Scoping Plan. For instance, the SJVACD’s guidance recommends that projects should demonstrate that “ project specific GHG emissions would be reduced or mitigated by at least 29%, compared to Business as Usual (BAU), including GHG emission reductions achieved since the 2002 -2004 baseline period, consistent with GHG emission reduction targets established in ARB’s AB 32 Scoping Plan. Projects achieving at least a 29% GHG emission reduction compared to BAU would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG.”
Subsequent to the SJVAPCD’s approval of the Final Draft Guidance fo r Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (SJVAPCD 2015), the California Supreme Court issued an opinion that affects the conclusions that should/should not be drawn from a GHG emissions analysis that is based on consistency with the AB 32 Scoping Pla n. More specifically, in Center for Biological Diversity v.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife , the Court ruled that showing a “project -level reduction” that meets or exceeds the Scoping Plan’s overall statewide GHG reduction goal is not necessaril y sufficient to show that the proposed Project’s GHG impacts will be adequately mitigated: “the Scoping Plan nowhere related that statewide level of reduction effort to the percentage of reduction that would or should be required from individual projects...” According to the Court, the lead agency cannot simply assume that the overall level of effort required to achieve the statewide goal for emissions reductions will suffice for a specific project.

Given this Court decision, reliance on a 29 percent GHG em issions reduction from projected BAU levels compared to the proposed Project’s estimated 2020 levels as recommended in the SJVAPCD’s guidance documents is not an appropriate basis for an impact conclusion in the MND. Given that the SJVAPCD staff has concluded that “existing science is inadequate to support quantification of impacts that project specific GHG emissions have on global climatic change, ” this MND instead relies on a qualitative approach for this analysis. The approach still relies on the Appendi x G of the CEQA Guidelines thresholds which indicate that climate change-related impacts are considered significant if implementation of the proposed Project would do any of the following:

1. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.

2. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
74 These two CEQA Appendix G threshold questions are provided within the Initial Study checklist and are the thresholds used for the subsequent analysis. The focus of the analysis is on the proposed Project’s generation of GHG emissions in comparison to the Original Project.

The Original Project and the Revised Project would gener ate GHGs during the construction and operational phases. The primary source of construction-related would result from emissions of CO 2 associated with the construction of the proposed project, and worker vehicle trips. Both the Original Project and the Revised Project would require limited grading, and would also include site preparation, building construction, and architectural coating phases. The operational phase would generate GHGs primarily from the operational vehicle trips and building energy (electr icity and natural gas) usage. Other sources of GHG emissions would be minimal. Construction -related GHGs are provided in Table GHG -1 and Table GHG -2, below, for the Original Project and the proposed Project, respectively. Additionally, operational-related GHGs are provided in Table GHG-3 and Table GHG-4, below, for the Original Project and the Revised Project, respectively.

Construction Emissions
Table GHG-1: Original Project Construction GHG Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Year Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2022 0 179.1785 179.1785 0.0564 0.0002 180.6365
2023 0 1,021.9134 1,021.9134 0.1580 0.0490 1,040.4749
2024 0 1,295.0919 1,295.0919 0.0871 0.0945 1,325.4144
2025 0 1,265.5184 1,265.5184 0.0850 0.0917 1,294.9600
2026 0 1,241.9873 1,241.9873 0.0839 0.0894 1,270.7193
2027 0 1,219.1400 1,219.1400 0.0829 0.0871 1,247.1718
2028 0 1,193.5523 1,193.5523 0.0817 0.0847 1,220.8374
2029 0 640.7267 640.7267 0.0714 0.0364 653.3426
2030 0 29.8860 29.8860 0.0008 0.0005 30.0521
Maximum 0 1,295.0919 1,295.0919 0.1580 0.0945 1,325.4144 SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0).

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
75 Table GHG-1: Revised Project Construction GHG Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Year Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2022 0 179.1785 179.1785 0.0564 0.0002 180.6365
2023 0 824.1367 824.1367 0.1556 0.0259 835.7486
2024 0 910.7354 910.7354 0.0828 0.0495 927.5586
2025 0 891.1358 891.1358 0.0810 0.0479 907.4375
2026 0 875.8802 875.8802 0.0802 0.0466 891.7713
2027 0 861.3555 861.3555 0.0795 0.0453 876.8511
2028 0 844.8450 844.8450 0.0785 0.0440 859.9249
2029 0 489.6585 489.6585 0.0700 0.0190 497.0656
2030 0 24.9414 24.9414 0.0007 0.0004 25.0700
Maximum 0 910.7354 910.7354 0.1556 0.0495 927.5586
SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0).

Operational Emissions
Table GHG-3: Original Operational GHG Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Category Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Area 0 120.2615 120.2615 0.0054 0.0021 121.0359
Energy 0 2,203.8879 2,203.8879 0.2306 0.0421 2,222.1943 Mobile 0 23,059.3187 23,059.3187 1.3736 1.2810 23,475.3951 Waste 272.0180 0.0000 272.0180 16.0758 0.0000 673.9132
Water 32.7926 72.3641 105.1567 3.3798 0.0810 213.7745
Total 304.8106 25,455.8321 25,760.6428 21.0652 1.4062 26,706.3129 SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0).

Table GHG-4: Revised Project Operational GHG Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Category Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Area 323.5795 274.7760 598.3556 1.5249 0.0049 637.9391
Energy 0 1,717.1723 1,717.1723 0.1162 0.0322 1,729.6806 Mobile 0 9,459.1432 9,459.1432 0.6507 0.5744 9,646.5699 Waste 201.7345 0.0000 201.7345 11.9222 0.0000 499.7886
Water 18.0472 37.7643 55.8114 1.8597 0.0445 115.5682
Total 543.3612 11,488.8558 12,032.2169 16.0737 0.6560 12,629.5463 SOURCE: CALEEMOD (V.2020.4.0).

As shown in the above tables, the Revised Project would generate fewer GHG emissions than the Original Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would generate a net benefit relative to GHG emissions compared to the Original Project. Therefore, the Revised Project would not generate GHG emissions that would have a significant impact on the environment or conflict with any applicable plans, policies, or regulations. Impacts related to greenhouse gases are less than significant.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
76 3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact HAZ-1: Create a
significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HAZ-2: Create a
significant hazard to the public
or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions
involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HAZ-3: Emit
hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HAZ-4: Be located on
a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact HAZ-5: For a project
located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people
residing or working in the
project area?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HAZ-6: Impair
implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HAZ-7: Expose people
or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to hazards and hazardous materials. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
77 the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project wi thin the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re - designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re-designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential u ses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different l ocation within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed for disturbance would not change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. As such, no changes to potential impacts to hazards and hazardous materials would occur as a result of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Canner y Park EIR mitigation measures (listed below) . These mitigation measures would be required by the project revisions and would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Hazardous and Toxic Materials and Sites
Mitigation Measure 1. Soils identified by Harding ESE (2002) as posing a potential threat to groundwater quality shall be excavated and transported to an appropriate disposal facility. Alternatively, these soils may be remediated by using on-site bio-remediation techniques until the subject constituent concentrations are reduced below levels that would no longer threaten water quality.

Mitigation Measure 2. Lead-contaminated so ils in the former can dump area shall be removed and disposed in accordance with applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations. Cleanup activities shall occur in coordination with, and with the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and/or California EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control, as appropriate.

Mitigation Measure 3. Removal or demolition of any structures containing asbestos -containing materials or lead - based paint, as identified in the Phase II study (Harding ESE 2002), shall be removed and disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

Mitigation Measure 4. Existing water wells will not be developed for further use, and monitoring wells, shall be closed in accordance with San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department guidelines.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses HAZ-1 – HAZ-2): The Revised Project would amend the General Plan and rezone the Revised Project site to remove commercial uses and add residential uses to the Revised Project site.

The Project site is surrounded by existing residential, industrial, and open space uses. The proposed commercial and residential land uses do not routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials, or present a reasonably foreseeable release of hazardous materials, with the exception of EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
78 common hazardous materials such as household cleaners, paint, engine oil, and similar household substances. The operational phase of the proposed Project does not pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

The Revised Project site has historically been used for agricultural purposes. Like most agric ultural operations in the Central Valley, agricultural practices in the area have used agricultural chemicals as a standard practice.

Hazardous Materials Investigations at the Original Project The EIR for the Original Project, which included 489.40 acres, inclusive of the Revised Project site acreage (99.88 acres), analyzed potential hazard impacts within the overall Original Project. The EIR for the Original Project identified that the Original Project would not involve significant exposure to hazards from traffic operations or hazardous materials spills on SR 99, and that the Original Project would not be exposed to any significant safety risks from these sources.

Additionally, although the EIR for the Original Project identified that although the Original Project would be exposed to risks associated with train accidents, some of which may involve hazardous material releases, statistical information indicates the risk of accidents or incidents is relatively low.

Moreover, the Project site for the Revised Project would be located distant from the UPRR railroad tracks located to the west of the Revised Project site, approximately 0.5 miles from the Revised Project site at its closest location.

Separately, the EIR for the Original Project also identified that, due to its industrial use history, the former cannery site for the Original Project and surrounding lands have been subject to numerous environmental site assessments (ESAs). The ESA for the Original Project identified concerns associated with 1) a can and rubbish burn dump located south of Bear Creek, 2) total dissolved solids levels in groundwater samples, 3) potential contamination associated with above-ground diesel fuel storage tanks, 4) potential contamination of ditches by wastewater flows and 5) asbestos-containing materials and lead -based paints. However, it should be noted that most of these concerns were identified within areas outside of the Revised Project site for the Revised Project.

Overall, the Phase I and II investigations of the f ormer cannery site conducted for the EIR for the Original Project, which included the Project site, revealed relatively few environmental conditions requiring additional action. Sampling and laboratory testing of project site soils for organochlorine pesticides found trace levels of pesticide residues in eight of 10 samples, but pesticide levels were well below Preliminary Remediation Goals for residential uses, at the time the Phase I and II investigations were conducted.

A former drainage ditch and associ ated waste soil removed from the ditch was identified as having petroleum product and BTEX contamination that would pose a potential threat to water quality. The Phase II study recommended that these materials be removed and disposed at an appropriate disposal site.

The Phase II study identified numerous building materials containing ACMs and building components coated with lead-based paints. The Phase II study indicated that these materials would need to be properly removed during demolition of these stru ctures. The recommendations of the Phase II study are accounted for in Cannery Park EIR (Original Project) mitigation measures.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
79 Conclusion
Existing regulations require a Soils Management Plan (SMP) to be submitted and approved by the San Joaquin County Dep artment of Environmental Health if any construction activities require the handling of hazardous materials, including fuels, paints, cleaners, solvents, etc. SMPs are required to be posted and maintained onsite throughout the duration of construction.

Existing regulations require a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) to be submitted and approved by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health if any activities require the handling of hazardous materials, or generation of hazardous waste. This requires t he user to register with the CUPA as a generator of hazardous waste, obtain an EPA ID# and accumulate, ship and dispose of the hazardous waste per Health and Safety Code Ch. 6.5. (California Hazardous Waste Control Law).

Overall, consistency with federal, State, and local laws and regulations related to the handling of hazardous materials and implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the Cannery Park EIR, would reduce potential impacts that could occur due to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or through the reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment associated with construction activities within the Project site to a less than significant level.

Response HAZ-3): The Project site is located over ¼ mile from an existing school. The nearest school to the Revised Project site is the Aspire Vincent Shalvey Academy, located 0.27 miles from the Project site, at its closest point. Because the Pro ject site is beyond the ¼ -mile radius of a school, Implementation of the Revised Project would result in no impact relative to this topic.

Response HAZ-4): According the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) there are no Federal Superfun d Sites, State Response Sites, or Voluntary Cleanup Sites on, or in the near vicinity of the Revised Project site. The Revised Project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code § 65962.5. The nearest site identified within these databases are located approximately 1.1 miles to the south of the Revised Project site:
• Morada Lane Secondary Schools (site 39820003). The approximately 14-acre site is occupied by modular portable classrooms, parking and landsc aped areas, surrounded by residential properties. Prior to school construction, the site was utilized for agricultural purposes, indicating the potential for pesticide application. The Site was part of farmland from 1940 until approximately 1993. South of the Site is newly developed homes and open fields; on the east are four baseball fields, and on the west and north is open grassland. The potential contaminants of concern are not identified. This site has a current status of Inactive.

The Revised Project site is not directly affected by these sites. Implementation of the Revised Project would result in a less than significant impact relative to this environmental topic.

Response HAZ-5): The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) establishes distances of gr ound clearance for take-off and landing safety based on such items as the type of aircraft using the airport.

The Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or public airport. The closest airport or airstrip is the Wallom Field -8CA8, located approximately 2.9 miles east of the Revised Project site. Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact with regards to this environmental issue.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
80 Response HAZ-6): The Office of Emergency Services (OES) maintains an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) that serves as the official Emergency Plan for San Joaquin County. It includes planned operational functions and overall responsibilities of County Departments during an em ergency situation. The Emergency Plan also contains a threat summary for San Joaquin County, which addresses the potential for natural, technological and human-caused disasters (County Code, Title 4- 3007).

The County OES also prepared a Hazardous Material s Area Plan (§2720 H&S, 2008) that describes the hazardous materials response system developed to protect public health, prevent environmental damage and ensure proper use and disposal of hazardous materials. The plan establishes effective response capabilities to contain and control releases, establishes oversight of long-term cleanup and mitigation of residual releases, and integrates multi-jurisdiction and agency coordination. This plan is now implemented by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department.

The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department maintains a Hazardous Materials Management Plan/ Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMMP/HMBP). The HMMP/HMBP describes agency roles, strategies and processes for responding to emergencies involving hazardous materials.

The Environmental Health Department maintains a Hazardous Materials Database and Risk and Flood Maps available to the public on its website.

In San Joaquin County, all major roads are available for evacuation, depending on the location and type of emergency that arises. The Revised Project does not include any actions that would impair or physically interfere with any of San Joaquin County’s emergency plans or evacuation routes. Future uses on the Revised Project site will have access to the County resources that establish protocols for safe use, handling and transport of hazardous materials. Construction activities are not expected to result in any unknown significant road closures, traffic detours, or congestion that could hin der the emergency vehicle access or evacuation in the event of an emergency. Implementation of the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact with regards to this environmental issue.

Response HAZ-7): The risk of wildfire is related to a va riety of parameters, including fuel loading (vegetation), fire weather (winds, temperatures, humidity levels and fuel moisture contents), and topography (degree of slope). Steep slopes contribute to fire hazard by intensifying the effects of wind and makin g fire suppression difficult. Fuels such as grass are highly flammable because they have a high surface area to mass ratio and require less heat to reach the ignition point, while fuels such as trees have a lower surface area to mass ratio and require more heat to reach the ignition point. The City has areas with an abundance of flashy fuels (i.e., grassland) in the outlying residential parcels and open lands that, when combined with warm and dry summers with temperatures often exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit, create a situation that results in higher risk of wildland fires. Most wildland fires are human caused, so areas with easy human access to land with the appropriate fire parameters generally result in an increased risk of fire.

The City of Stockton contains areas with “moderate” and “non -wildland fuel” ranks. The areas warranting “moderate” fuel ranks possess combustible material in sufficient quantities combined with topographic characteristics that pose a wildfire risk. CalFire data for the areas i mmediately surrounding the Project site also include “moderate” and “non-wildland fuel” ranks. The Project site is located in an area with a “Local Responsibility Zone (LRA) Unzoned” rank. The Project site is also not located on a steep slope, and the Proj ect site is essentially flat. The Revised Project site is also located in an urban area, with existing or future urban development located on all sides. Therefore, this is a less than significant impact and no mitigation is required.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
81 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
82 3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact HYD-1: Violate any
water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade
surface or ground water quality?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact HYD-2: Substantially
decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that
the project may impede
sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HYD-3: Result in
substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off-site;
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact HYD-4: Substantially
increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or
offsite;
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact HYD-5: Create or
contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HYD-6: Impede or
redirect flood flows?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HYD-7: In flood hazard,
tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to
project inundation?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact HYD-8: Conflict with or
obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater
management plan?
Less than
Significant
No No No No

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
83 Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to hydrology and water quality. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate

11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for lo w density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed f or disturbance would not change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. As such, no changes to potential impacts to hydrology and water quality impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Canner y Park EIR mitigation measures (listed below) . These mitigation measures would be required by the project revisions and would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Surface Water Features
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall design all structures to be located within the Bear Creek floodway to avoid significant backwater effects, as defined by the State Reclamation Board.

Mitigation Measure 2. Proposed improvements within the Bear Creek floodway shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director as well as state and federal permit agencies with jurisdiction, including the US Army Corps of Engineers, the State Reclamation Board and the California Department of Fish and Game.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall design all project improvements requiring crossings of Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID) facilities to the specifications of WID. All such facilities shall be subject to WID, and the Community Development Director's review and approval.

Water Quality Degradation
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall demonstrate compliance with City Code Sections 7 -859, 7 -859.1 and 7 -859.2 to the Municipal Utilities Department to insure that sufficient post - construction storm water pollution prevention practices have been incorporated into the project design. This would include required compliance with the City's Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to t he Municipal Utilities Department that includes both construction stage and permanent storm EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
84 water pollution prevention practices. This Plan must be developed during the project design phase and submitted and approved prior to the start of construction.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response HYD-1): Implementation of Revised Project would not violate any water quality or waste discharge requirements. Construction activities including grading could temporarily increase soil erosion rates during and shortly after project construction. Construction-related erosion could result in the loss of soil and could adversely affect water quality in nearby surface waters. The RWQCB requires a project-specific SWPPP to be prepared for each project that dist urbs an area one acre or larger. The SWPPP is required to include project specific best management measures that are designed to control drainage and erosion. The SWPPP and the project -specific drainage plan would reduce the potential for the proposed Project to violate water quality standards during construction.

A Project Stormwater Quality Control Plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City of Stockton Department of Mu nicipal Utilities. In particular, the proposed Project Stormwater Quality Control Plan will need to specify BMPs the proposed Project will use and design specifications for selected BMPs . This would ensure that the Revised Project to be consistent with reg ulatory requirements, which would ensure that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on operation-related water quality.

Response HYD-2): The Revised Project site is located in the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin.

Much of the groundwater recharge in the basin occurs in the sand and gravels along the San Joaquin River from Sierra snowmelt flowing downstream. Precipitation in the region is 13.81 inches, most of which falls between November through April. A portion of this annual rainfall infiltrates the soil and groundwater basin, while a portion is discharged downstream into the Delta. Since the building coverage ratio for residential uses is much less than for commercial uses, and given that the Revised Project would increase r esidential uses (i.e. housing) and reduce commercial uses overall, it is anticipated that the Revised Project would increase the amount of pervious surfaces within the Revised Project site compared to that of the Original Project . For example, the single-family residential uses associated with the Revised Project would include extensive pervious areas such as front- and backyards, which would promote increase infiltration of groundwater, compared with the minimal amount of pervious areas within the commercial uses associated with the Original project.

Therefore, the Revised Project would facilitate on-site groundwater recharge better than the Original Project, overall.

Additionally, similar to the Original Project, the Revised Project g rading design direct s onsite stormwater runoff from the area north of Bear Creek toward several storm drain inlets located throughout the Revised Project area. These inlets would collect stormwater runoff into a connected underground storm drain piping system that would convey the runoff to a point of connection to the existing offsite storm drain piping east of the Holman Road and Tri -Valley Drive intersection. Both the proposed piping system and the existing offsite piping system are sized to accommodate the Revised Project runoff. From this point of connection, the existing storm drain system would continue conveying the Revised Project runoff west to an existing storm drainage basin located west of the Project site and north of Bear Creek. All stormwater from the area north of Bear Creek w ould be directed to the existing stormwater basin. Stormwater within the existing basin w ould either infiltrate into existing soils as it does in the pre -development condition, and/or discharge into Bear Creek via a new stormwater pump station. Stormwater from the area south of Bear Creek would be directed to the proposed storm drainage basin (Lot B) as shown on the Tentative Map. Stormwater from this storm drainage basin would be discharged into the existing 30-inch City storm drain located EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
85 within existing PFC Jesse Mizener Street. The Revised Project w ould incorporate site design measures, landscape features, and approved engineered treatment facilities for storm water quality treatment and for retention or det ention of storm water to reduce post -development runoff discharge rates and pollutants consistent with the City of Stockton NPDES SWMP and the City of Stockton and County of San Joaquin Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan.

The City of Stockton Metropolitan Area (COSMA) has three water retailers including the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities District (COSMUD), California Water Service Company (Cal Water), and San Joaquin County within their respective service areas. According to the Water Supply Assessment (WSA) prepared for the Revised Project, t he Revised Project site will receive its water from the COSMUD, which relies on purchased water from the Calaveras, Stanislaus, and Mokelumne Rivers; surface water from the San Joaquin Delta; and groundwater. According to the WSA, projected potable water demands for buildout of the Revised Project would total approximately 192 acre-feet per year (AFY). Pursuant to California Water Code Section 10910(4) and based on the technical an alyses described in the WSA, the WSA demonstrates that the COSMUD existing and additional planned future water supplies are sufficient to meet the COSMUD existing water demands, including those future water demands associated with the Revised Project. That is, sufficient water supplies exist to meet the Revised Project’s build-out water demand as well as all existing and reasonably foreseeable water demands. As such, implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Responses HYD-3 - HYD-6): When land is in a natural or undeveloped condition, soils, mulch, vegetation, and plant roots absorb rainwater. This absorption process is called infiltration or percolation. Much of the rainwater that falls on natur al or undeveloped land slowly infiltrates the soil and is stored either temporarily or permanently in underground layers of soil. When the soil becomes completely soaked or saturated with water or the rate of rainfall exceeds the infiltration capacity of the soil, the rainwater begins to flow on the surface of land to low lying areas, ditches, channels, streams, and rivers. Rainwater that flows off a site is defined as storm water runoff. When a site is in a natural condition or is undeveloped, a larger percentage of rainwater infiltrates into the soil and a smaller percentage flow off the Project site as storm water runoff.

The infiltration and runoff process is altered when a site is developed. Buildings, sidewalks, roads, and parking lots introduce asphalt, concrete, and roofing materials to the landscape. These materials are relatively impervious, which means that they absorb less rainwater. As impervious surfaces are added to the ground conditions, the natural infiltration process is reduced. As a res ult, the volume and rate of storm water runoff increases. The increased volumes and rates of storm water runoff can result in flooding if adequate storm drainage facilities are not provided.

A portion of Bear Creek is located between Project site parcels. However, development would occur with a substantial buffer between Bear Creek and the proposed developments. Stormwater from the area south of Bear Creek will be directed to the basin (Lot A) as shown on the Tentative Map, which will either be discharged into Bear Creek, into the Woodbridge Irrigation District South Main Canal, or into the existing 30-inch City storm drain in PFC Jesse Mizener. Any discharge to Bear Creek would be performed under a discharge permit. Other than the discharge of stormwater to Bear Creek, the Revised Project would not alter or adversely impact offsite drainage facilities.

The Revised Project would increase imperv ious surfaces throughout the Revised Project site. The Revised Project would require the installation of storm drainage infrastructure to ensure that storm waters properly drain from the Revised Project site. The proposed storm drainage plan includes an EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
86 engineered network of storm drain lines, manholes, inlets, and water quality basin s. The storm drainage plan was designed and engineered to ensure proper construction of storm drainage infrastructure to control runoff and prevent flooding, erosion, and sedim entation. The Municipal Utilities Department reviews all storm drainage plans as part of the improvement plan submittal to ensure that all facilities are designed to the City’s standards and specifications. The Municipal Utilities Department also reviews all storm drainage plans to ensure that post-project runoff does not exceed established limitations. The Municipal Utilities Department’s review of pre- and post-project runoff is intended to ensure that the capacity of the existing storm drainage system is not exceeded. This determination is ultimately made by the Municipal Utilities Department during the improvement plan review and approval.

Additionally, as described in the EIR for the Original Project, the Revised Project is required to demonstrate compliance with the City’s Municipal Code to ensure sufficient post-construction storm water pollution practices have been incorporated into the Revised Project design, including compliance with the City’s Stormwater Quality Control Criteria Plan. The proposed Project is also required to submit a SWPPP and a Project Stormwater Quality Control Plan, as provided under Mitigation Measure GEO -2 and Mitigation Measure HYD -1, respectively, which includes both construction stage and permanent storm water pollution prevention practices.

The proposed Project Stormwater Quality Control Plan will require the construction of new storm water drainage facilities on the Revised Project site; however, the construction of these facilities would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the area, or alter the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding, or create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity or existing or planned drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The Revised Project would also not conflict with any water control quality plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.

Overall, compliance with Federal, State, and local standards and regulations as well as implementation of mitigation measures contained with the Canner Park EIR would ensure that the Revised Project would not result in substantial erosion, siltation, surface runoff, flooding, or polluted runoff and that the impact would be less than significant.

Response HYD-7 – HYD-8): The risks of flooding hazards on the Revised Project site and immediate surroundings are primarily related to large, infrequent storm events. These risks of flooding are greatest during the rainy season between November and April. Flooding events can result in damage to structures, injury or loss of human and animal life, exposure to waterborne diseases, and damage to in frastructure. In addition, standing floodwater can destroy agricultural crops, undermine infrastructure and structural foundations, and contaminate groundwater.

The Revised Project site is located outside the 100 - year flood zone, but within the 500 -year flood zone. However, the Revised Project site is located in an area of reduced flood risk due to a levee, as shown in Figure 17. Therefore, the Revised Project site is categorized as an area with minimal risk of flooding.

According to the 200-year flood map maintained by the San Joaquin County Public Works, portions of the Revised Project site fall have a 200-year base flood elevation (BFE) of 3 feet or less in all areas to be developed. This qualifies the Revised Project site under the “Shallow Flooding Exe mption” under the City of Stockton’s Criteria for Development in the 200-year Floodplains.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
87 As shown in Figure 18, t he Revised Project site is located within a dam inundation area for the Salt Springs dam, and the northern parcels of the Project site are lo cated within a dam inundation area for the Camanche dam. Dam failure is generally a result of structural instability caused by improper design or construction, instability resulting from seismic shaking, or overtopping and erosion of the dam. Larger dams that are higher than 25 feet or with storage capacities over 50 acre -feet of water are regulated by the California Dam Safety Act, which is implemented by the California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (DSD). The DSD is responsible for inspecting and monitoring these dams. The Act also requires that dam owners submit to the California Office of Emergency Services inundation maps for dams that would cause significant loss of life or personal injury as a result of dam failure. The Cou nty Office of Emergency Services is responsible for developing and implementing a Dam Failure Plan that designates evacuation plans, the direction of floodwaters, and provides emergency information. Regular inspection by DSD and maintenance by the dam owners ensure that the dams are kept in safe operating condition. As such, failure of these dams is considered to have an extremely low probability of occurring and is not considered to be a reasonably foreseeable event.

The Revised Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. Revised The Project site is not anticipated to be inundated by a tsunami because it is located approximately 60 miles away from the Pacific Ocean which is the closest ocean waterbody. The Revised Project site is not anticipated to be inundated by a seiche because it is not located in close proximity to a water body capable of creating a seiche. The level of risk regarding this environmental topic is the same as the Original Project.

Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to the risk of release of pollutants due to project inundation by flood hazards, seiches, and tsunamis, or t he potential to alter the course of a stream or river in a manner that would impede or redirect flood flows.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
88 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
89 This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
90 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
91 This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
92 3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact LU-1: Physically divide
an established community?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact LU-2: Cause a significant
environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for
the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental
effect?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect land use and planning. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce resident ial uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate

11.27 acres of high density residential lan d located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The land use impacts were identified and discussed in the Cannery Park EIR. The Original Project anticipated industrial and commercial land uses to be developed on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project site is within the footprint of the Original Project Site and has the same physical environmental impacts. The Revised Project modifies the land use within the Revised Project site , but that does not change the physical environmental impacts on this topic. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Canner y Park EIR mitigation measures (listed below). These mitigation measures would be required by the project revisions and would ensure that there are no land use conflicts, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions. The Revised Project would not result in any new potential land use impacts and would not increase the significance of any land use impacts identified in the Original Project.

Additionally, there are no new land use impacts beyond what was addressed in the Cannery Park EIR.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Land Use Conflicts
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
93 Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall submit proposed commercial development site plans, reflecting the following provisions, to the City of Stockton for review and approval in accordance with applicable ordinances, standards and guidelines. Commercial development plans shall conform to applicable ordinances, standards and guidelines as well as the requirements of the Development Agreement and mitigation measures specified in the EIR, as determined by the Community Development Director and other department heads, as applicable.

Mitigation Measure 2. Wherever feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director, proposed commercial sites shall be separated from residential uses or other noise-sensitive land uses by a public street, a private access way or an equivalent buffer (e.g., Bear Creek). With a private access way, a backup wall and 15- foot landscaping strip shall be provided betw een the private access and the adjoining residential property, as provided m Mitigation Measures 3 and 4 below.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest of sites designated for future commercial development shall, at the time of commercial development, install and maintain a solid masonry wall along any property boundary shared with residential land use designations or zoning. The wall shall be a minimum of eight feet in height, and the foundation of said wall shall be engi neered to allow for extension of wall height to a maximum of 12 feet. Extension of wall height above the eight-foot minimum shall be required if the acoustical report required in Chapter 13.0 Noise indicates increased wall height is necessary to comply with City noise standard, or the Community Development Director deems an increase necessary to mitigate or eliminate all other land use impacts.

Mitigation Measure 4. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall incorporate the following requirements into commercial development site plans:
a. Setbacks from adjacent, residentially -zoned parcels for commercial buildings or structures shall be as follows:

1. The equivalent of the height of the building or structure, but not less than 15 feet, if no access road is provided between the building or structure and the property line, or

2. 45 feet or more, if an access road is provided between the building or structure and the property line. b. A minimum 15 -foot landscaping strip shall be installed and maintained along the boundary of adjoining residentially-zoned parcels. The landscaping strip shall be planted with trees and shrubs and shall be fitted with an automatic irrigation system.
c. Commercial building or structure setbacks from front or side yard property lines abutting a public street shall be a minimum of ten feet.
d. Commercial parking area setbacks from front or side yard property lines abutting a public street shall be a minimum of five feet. Landscaping, including an automatic irrigation system adequate to maintain the subject landscaping area, shall be installed and maintained within this setback area, except for required vehicle and pedestrian access openings.
e. Sign, parking area and other outdoor lighting on proposed commercial sites shall be shielded to prevent glare onto, or illumination of, adjoining residential areas.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response LU-1): The Revised Project site is located in the northeastern portion of the City of Stockton. The Revised Project is consistent with the surrounding uses and would not physically divide an establishe d community. Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Response LU-2): The Revised Project includes a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original within the 99.88-acre Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Project site.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
94 Over the past 14 years the market has not shown an interest in these land uses, while at the same time the demand for housing has reached a crisis status in the State of California. As a result, the Revised Project seeks to reverse some of the Original Project approvals to change approved commercial to residential uses to better reflect the market dema nd, and to assist in the current housing crisis.

The General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate 11.27 acres of high-density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re-designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses.

The Rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high-density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses.

The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Project site.

The development of the Revised Project uses within the Revised Project site would be consistent with the General Plan Amendment and rezone associated with the Revised Project. Therefore, the Revised Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
95 3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact MR-1: Result in the loss
of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value
to the region and the residents of
the state?
N/A No No No No
Impact MR-2: Result in the loss
of availability of a locally-
important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a
local general plan, specific plan
or other land use plan?
N/A No No No No

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to hazards and hazardous materials. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project wi thin the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re - designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re-designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek fo r low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The Revised Project’s footprint and area of disturbance would not change from what was addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR determined that the project would not result in any impacts related to mineral resources. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses MR-1 – MR-2): The Revised Project site is in an MRZ -1 designation in the Mineral Resources and Mineral Hazards Mapping Program (MRMHMP). Mining in this residential area is not practical given the number of sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity. There are no oil and gas extraction wells within or near the property. Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this environmental topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
96 3.13 NOISE
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact NOISE-1: Generation of a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the
project in excess of standards
established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies?
Significant
and
Unavoidable
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact NOISE-2: Generation of
excessive groundborne vibration
or groundborne noise levels?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact NOISE-3: For a project
located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project
expose people residing or
working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Less than
Significant
No No No No

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to noise. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek fo r low density residential uses, 2) re-designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed for disturbance would n ot change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. As such, no changes to potential impacts to noise impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. The C annery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Cannery Park EIR mitigation measures (listed below) . As applicable, t hese mitigation measures EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
97 would be required by the project revisions, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Traffic Noise Exposure to Noise-Sensitive Land Uses
Mitigation Measure 1. Masonry walls will be constructed along the east and west side of Holman Road at a minimum height of six feet or higher, at the discretion of the Community Development Director.

Railroad Noise
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall construct a masonry wall, earthen berm or berm/wall combination along the portion of the western project site boundary that abuts proposed residential development. The berm/wall shall be constructed prior to occupan cy of any dwelling units located within the area subject to noise levels in excess of 65 dB. The berm/wall shall be a minimum of 11 feet in height within 1,000 feet to Eight Mile Road, and otherwise shall be a minimum of six feet.

Mitigation Measure 2. Two-story structures proposed within the area subject to noise levels in excess of 65 dB ·shall be subject to additional acoustical analysis prior to issuance of building permits. Facade wall and window specifications shall provide sufficient noise attenua tion to allow the City's interior noise standard of 45 dB Ldn to be maintained.

Two-story structures in this area shall be fitted with mechanical ventilation to allow occupants to close windows and doors.

Noise Impacts Associated with Industrial and Commercial Uses Mitigation Measure 1. A noise study shall be completed by a qualified acoustical consultant prior to issuance of building permits for industrial or commercial uses which are located within 400 feet of residential areas. The study shall identify potential noise sources, effects of setbacks on noise impacts, design features and/or other noise attenuation measures that will provide compliance with City noise standards.

Mitigation Measure 2. Noise from industrial or commercial uses shall, wh ere feasible, be mitigated by locating delivery areas, loading docks, refuse storage areas and other exterior noise sources so that they are effectively shielded from nearby noise -sensitive uses. Shielding may be accomplished by locating such areas on the opposite side of buildings from noise-sensitive uses, at sufficient distance from sensitive uses, or by constructing noise barriers.

Mitigation Measure 3. Heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment for commercial uses located less than 50 feet from residential property should be located so that equipment is effectively shielded from the residential property, i.e., by parapet walls.

Mitigation Measure 4. Where commercial and industrial uses adjacent to residential uses, they shall be separated by a barrier wall at least eight feet in height. Wall height shall be increased to the degree such need is identified in the acoustical study required by mitigation measure #1. The ultimate height of such barriers shall be determined by the Community Developmen t Director based on the acoustical study. Wall foundations will be designed to permit increased height as determined by the Director.

Mitigation Measure 5. Site and building plans for industrial and commercial uses located within 400 feet of noise sensitive residential uses shall incorporate other noise control features as may be identified in the acoustical study required by mitigation #1, as required to comply with City noise standards. These requirements shall include:
a. Posting delivery areas prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to inform delivery personnel that noise reduction efforts are in effect at all times but especially between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. b. Prohibiting idling of truck engines during unloading/loading.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
98 c. Turning off refrigeration units on trucks and trailers while in the loading areas between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
d. Designing delivery areas so that loading and unloading occurs within structures. e. Screening or positioning HVAC exhaust fans to minimize their contribution to noise levels on residential parcels. f. Screening or enclosing trash compactor.
g. Controlling operations to minimize deliveries, trash compaction, or exterior repairs along the residential boundaries of the site between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.

Neighborhood Parks
Mitigation Measure 1. Development of the proposed neighborhood park site, if it will share property boundaries with residential uses, will include a minimum six-foot masonry wall along the boundary shared with the residential uses.

Construction Noise
Mitigation Measure 1. Temporary noise impacts resulting from project construction shall be minimized by restricting hours of operation by noise­ generating equipment to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday when such equipment ls to be used near noise -sensitive land uses, and by requiring residential type mufflers where applicable.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response NOISE-1):

TRAFFIC NOISE INCREASES AT EXISTING SENSITIVE RECEPTORS The impact conc lusion in the EIR for the Original Project was significant and unavoidable .

According to Fehr & Peers, the Revised Project is predicted to generate a total of 27,060 daily trips.

This is less than the Original Project, which would generate 45,688 trips (Fehr & Peers, 2022).

Therefore, the Revised Project traffic noise increases will be compatible with the surrounding l and uses. The Revised Project would not create a new impact, and would not increase the severity of the original impact on noise.

CONSTRUCTION NOISE
During the construction phases of the Revised Project, noise from construction activities would add to the noise environment in the immediate project vicinity. Activities involved in construction would generate maximum noise levels ranging from 76 to 90 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet. Construction activities would also be temporary in nature and are anticip ated to occur during normal daytime working hours.

Noise would also be generated during the construction phase by increased truck traffic on area roadways. A project-generated noise source would be truck traffic associated with transport of heavy materials and equipment to and from the construction site. This noise increase would be of short duration, and would occur during daytime hours.

Noise from localized point sources (such as construction sites) typically decreases by approximately 6 dBA with each doubling of distance from source to receptor. Given this noise attenuation rate and assuming no noise shielding from either natural or human -made features (e.g., trees, buildings, fences), outdoor receptors within approximately 1,600 feet of construction s ites could experience EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
99 maximum instantaneous noise levels of greater than 60 dBA when on-site construction-related noise levels exceed approximately 90 dBA at the boundary of the construction site. Nearby noise-sensitive receptors consist predominantly of r esidential dwellings located near the western and northern boundaries of the Revised Project site.

The City of Stockton Noise Ordinance places limitations on the acceptable hours of construction.

During development of the proposed project, construction act ivities occurring during the more noise-sensitive late evening and nighttime hours (i.e., 10 PM to 7 AM) are prohibited. Additionally, there are several residential uses directly adjacent the Revised Project site which may be subject to construction noise. Overall, based on the Noise Report prepared for the Revised Project, construction noise from the Revised Project would be similar to the construction noise analyzed within the Cannery Park EIR. As a result, with implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the Cannery Park EIR, there would be a less than significant impact relative to this issue.

EXTERIOR NON-TRANSPORTATION NOISE AT PROPOSED HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES The Revised Project includes the development of 15 commercial lots on land with an existing commercial designation adjacent to a future high -density residential use immediately to the south and east of the commercial use. The high density residential site has not been site planned, however, the intent is to incorporate the commercial and high density uses into an integrated and compatible plan with the commercial use, rather than building two isolated land uses.

TABLE NOISE-1: PART II: LAND USE-RELATED NOISE STANDARDS NOISE LEVEL DESCRIPTOR, dB DAYTIME
(7 A.M. TO 10 P.M.)

NIGHTTIME
(10 P.M. TO 7 A.M.)
Hourly Leq 55 45
Maximum Sound Level Lmax 75 65
NOTES: (1) THE NOISE STANDARD MUST BE APPLIED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE RECEIVING LAND USE . WHEN DETERMINING

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES , THE STANDARDS MUST BE APPLIED ON THE RECEIVING SIDE OF NOISE BARRIERS OR OTHER PROPERTY LINE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES. (2) EACH OF THE NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS SPECIFIED MUST BE DECREASED BY 5 FOR IMPULSE NOISE, SIMPLE TONE NOISE, OR NOISE CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SPEECH OR MUSIC.

SOURCE: CITY OF STOCKTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 16.60.040, STANDARDS.

The proposed commercial uses are predicted to generate noise levels of up to 57 dBA at the future residential property line during daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) hours and up to 48 dBA during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. This exceeds the City of Stockton daytime n oise level standard of 55 dBA Leq and nighttime noise level standard of 45 dBA Leq (See Table NOISE -1 for hourly Leq standards for land uses).

While the high density residential site has not been site planned, the area where the noise threshold is exceeded at the parcel line is anticipated to be used for landscape buffers and parking space. The high density residential buildings are anticipated to be designed with a setback from the property line and commercial uses such that they would be built in an area that is within the City of Stockton noise level standards shown in Table NOISE-1. In order to ensure compliance with the City’s daytime and nighttime noise standards, an evaluation of the high density residential site is necessary after it is designed for architectural design review. The City would need to review the site plan during that process to ensure that there are no buildings placed along the property line where the exceedance occurs. Overall, based on the Noise Report prepared for the Revis ed Project, exterior non - transportation noise at the proposed high density residential uses within the Revised Project would EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
100
be similar to the exterior non -transportation noise at the location of the proposed Revised Project high density residential uses analyzed within the Cannery Park EIR. The impact conclusion in the EIR for the Original Project was significant and unavoidable. The Revised Project would not create a new impact, and would not increase the severity of the original impact on noise.

EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE AT PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES Table NOISE-2 shows the predicted traffic noise levels at the proposed residential uses adjacent to State Route 99. Based upon Table NOISE-2, exterior noise levels would exceed the City’s 60 dBA L dn normally acceptable exterior noise standard (Table NOISE-3), as well as the City 65 dBA Ldn maximum acceptable noise exposure (Table NOISE-4). The 60 dBA L dn noise contours for State Route 99 were found to extend to an approximate distance of 2,037 feet from the roadway centerline. This would encroach into the outdoor activity areas of proposed residences. Therefore, use of a physical barrier would be the only feasible method to reduce exterior noise levels to within the City’s allowable exterior noise standard range for the normally acceptable standard.

TABLE NOISE-2: FUTURE (2043) TRANSPORTATION NOISE LEVELS AT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL USES

SEGMENT

APPROXIMATE

RESIDENTIAL
SETBACK, FEET1
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS, DB LDN2
NO

BARRIER
10’

BARRIER
11’

BARRIER
12’

BARRIER
13’

BARRIER
14’

BARRIER
State Route 99 135 78 67 66 65 64 63
NOTES:
1 SETBACK DISTANCES ARE MEASURED IN FEET FROM THE CENTERLINES OF THE ROADWAYS TO THE CENTER OF RESIDENTIAL BACKYARDS.
2 THE MODELED NOISE BARRIERS ASSUME FLAT SITE CONDITIONS WHERE ROADWAY ELEVATIONS, BASE OF WALL ELEVATIONS, AND BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATELY EQUIVALENT. SOUND BARRIER HEIGHT MAY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE USE OF A WALL AND EARTHEN BERM TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL HEIGHT (E.G. A 6-FOOT WALL ON 2-FOOT BERM IS EQUIVALENT TO AN 8-FOOT TALL BARRIER).

SOURCE: SAXELBY ACOUSTICS. 2022.

TABLE NOISE-3: PART I: TRANSPORTATION-RELATED NOISE STANDARDS (OUTDOOR/INDOOR)

NOISE LEVEL DESCRIPTOR, DB MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NOISE EXPOSURE (LDN DB)

OUTDOOR ACTIVITY AREAS INDOOR SPACES
Residential (all types) 65 45
Child care -- 45
Educational Facilities -- 45
Libraries and museums -- 45
Live-work facilities 65 45
Lodging 65 45
Medical services -- 45
Multi-use (with residential) 65 45

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
101
TABLE NOISE-4: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE

The modeled noise barriers assume flat site conditions where roadway elevations, base of wall elevations, and building pad elevations are approximately equivalent.

Based upon the data in Table NOISE-2, a 12-foot-tall barrier may be used to achieve compliance with the City’s exterior maximum noise level standard of 65 dBA Ldn for outdoor activity areas of residential uses. The proposed wall location is shown on Figure 19. Overall, based on the Noise Report prepared for the Revised Project, exterior traffic noise at proposed single -family residential uses from the Revised Project would be similar to the exterior traffic noise at the location of the proposed single -family residential uses analyzed within the Cannery Park EIR. The impact conclusion in the EIR for the Original Project was significant and unavoidable. The Revised Project would not create a new impact, and would not increase the severity of the original impact on noise.

INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS AT PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES Modern construction typically provides a 25 -dB exterior -to-interior noise level reduction with windows closed. Therefore, sensitive receptors exposed to exterior noise of 70 dB L dn, or less, will EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
102
typically comply with the City of Stockton 45 dB L dn interior noise level standard. Additi onal noise reduction measures, such as acoustically -rated windows, are generally required for exterior noise levels exceeding 70 dB Ldn.

It should be noted that noise barriers do not typically reduce exterior noise levels at second floor locations. The pr oposed residential uses are predicted to be exposed to unmitigated first -floor exterior transportation noise levels up 77 dBA Ldn. Mitigated first-floor noise levels of 63-65 dBA Ldn are expected after construction of sound barriers. The second -floor locations are not expected to receive adequate shielding from the proposed sound walls and may be exposed to noise levels 2 -3 dB higher than ground floor receivers. Therefore, noise levels of 80 dB Ldn are expected at the second- floor facades of the proposed residences.

Based upon a 25-dB exterior-to-interior noise level reduction, interior noise levels are predicted to be up to 55 dB Ldn at second floors and 40 dBA Ldn at first floors. Accordingly, predicted interior noise levels along the first row of resident ial uses along State Route 99 are predicted to exceed the City’s 45 dB Ldn interior noise level standard at second floor locations. Overall, based on the Noise Report prepared for the Revised Project, interior noise impacts at the proposed single -family residential uses of the Revised Project would be similar to the interior noise impacts at proposed single -family residential uses analyzed within the Cannery Park EIR. The impact conclusion in the EIR for the Original Project was significant and unavoidable . The Revised Project would not create a new impact, and would not increase the severity of the original impact on noise.

Response NOISE-2): Construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building structural damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of perception. Building damage can take the form of cosmetic or structural.

Construction vibration levels anticipated for the Revised Project are less than the 0.2 in/sec threshold at distance s of 26 feet. Sensitive receptors which could be impacted by construction related vibrations, especially vibratory compactors/rollers, are located approximately 26 feet, or further, from typical construction activities. At these distances construction vibr ations are not predicted to exceed acceptable levels. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary in nature and would likely occur during normal daytime working hours. This is a less than significant impact and no mitigation is required.

Response NOISE -3): There are no airports within two miles of the Revised Project vicinity.

Therefore, this impact is not applicable to the Revised Project. There is no impact relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
103

This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
104

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
105

This page left intentionally blank.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
106

3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact POP-1: Induce
substantial unplanned
population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
Less than
Significant
No No No No
Impact POP-2: Displace
substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
Less than
Significant
No No No No

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to population and housing. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate

11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high d ensity residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low den sity residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. 2 The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

2 It should be noted that the CG (Commercial, General) zone within the City of Stockton allows for a higher residential density than the Residential, Low Density (RL) zone, so the Revised Project could be considered as having a possible reduction in total allowable high density housing area.

Nevertheless, it should also be noted that the overall residential unit count between the Original Project and the Revised Project is anticipated to be the same. Therefore, there would be “no net loss” of housing units, under State law.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
107
As described in the Cannery Park EIR , implementation of the Original Project would not directly result in population growth, nor would it convert any land use designations to a use that would allow for the construction of housing. The Revised Project would not generate a significant number of new jobs which could lead indirectly to population growth. There are no homes or residences currently located on the Revised Project site, and therefore, no homes or people would be displaced as a result of project implementation. There would be no change to the analysis contained in the Cannery Park EIR and the project revisions would not increase the severity of any impacts related to population and housing. No new mitigation requirements are required for the project revisions.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
108
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response POP-1): According to the 2020 U.S. Census, the population in Stockton is 320,804 people, and the average persons per household is 3.20. The Revised Project would result in the construction of up to 617 residential units, which would generate up to an estimated 1,974 people. This is an estimated 0.6 percent growth in Stockton. An estimated 0.6 percent growth in Stockton is not considered substantial growth in Stockton or the region and it is consistent with the assumed growth in the General Plan. The approximately 1,974 people may come from Stockton or surrounding communities. The Revised Project would not include upsizing of offsite infrastructure or roadways.

The installation of new infrastructure would be limited to the internal Revised Project site. The sizing of the infrastructure would be specific to the number of residential units and the extent of commercial development proposed within the Revised Project site. Implementation of the Revised Project would not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly. Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Response POP-2): The Revised Project site currently contains undeveloped agricultural land. The Revised Project would not displace housing or people. Implementation of the Revised Project would have no impact relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
109

3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact PS-1: Fire protection? Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact PS-2: Police Protection? Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact PS-3: Schools? Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact PS-4: Parks? Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact PS-5: Other Public
Facilities?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to public services.

The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and r educe residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density r esidential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
110
With implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the Cannery Park EIR (listed below), as applicable , none of the proposed revisions to the project would result in new public services impacts or increase the severity of any impacts related to public services, above what was described in the Cannery Park EIR . More specifically, although the uses associated with the Revised Project would be different than the uses associated with the Original Project (e.g., more residential uses and fewer commercial uses) , none of the proposed revisions to the project would result in new public services impacts or increase the severity of any impacts related to p ublic services . For example, impacts related to fire services and police services would be similar to the Original Project, despite the land use changes associated with the Revised Project , which could result in a larger service population. Moreover, although the increased residential uses of the Revised Project could increase demand on schools and parks compared to the Original Project, the local school district collects impact fees from new developments under the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998, enacted by Senate Bill 50, and park fees are collected under the Quimby Act for the purposes of collecting fees to mitigate for increase park demands . This ensures that impacts to schools and parks would be no greater than that as provided within the Cannery Park EIR for the Original Project.

See the analysis under the ‘Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures’ header, below, for further detail.

Overall, impacts related to this topic would remain unchanged from the analysis in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Canner y Park EIR mitigation measures (listed below), as applicable. These mitigation measures would be required for the Revised Project, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation requirements are required for the project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Police Protection Services
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall comply with the Fire Protection Mitigation #3 requiring Police Department involvement in review of project design and emergency access.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall pay Public Facility Fees to defray capital facilities costs associated with expanding law enforcement services.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall fence and monitor contractors' storage yards during the construction phases of the project to prevent theft and vandalism, and to reduce calls for assistance from the Police Department.

Fire Protection Services
Mitigation Measure 1. The tentative map shall reserve a site acceptable to the Stockton Fire Department for development of a new northeast Stockton fire station.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall reserve land and pay required Public Facility Fees toward construction at new fire stations and related facilities prior to issuance of building permits.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall incorporate access, water supply and other fire suppression and emergency access/response needs in the proposed project design. Said designs shall be developed in consultation with the Community Development, Fire, Police and Public Works Departments and shall address such items as the location and design at streets and cul-de-sacs, residential numbering, mapping and other measures deemed necessary to permit access at emergency vehicles and firefighting equipment, minimize response times and provide adequate evacuation routes.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
111
Mitigation Measure 4. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall install fire hydrants and wate r distribution facilities which will provide fire flows which are adequate to support the City's existing Class I ISO rating and which conform to adopted Building Code Fire Safety Standards, for all of the uses proposed within the project area.

Schools
Mitigation Measure 1. The tentative map shall reserve an approximately 10.5-acre site adjacent to the Villa Antinori project site for development of a new elementary school.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall pay adopted developer fees toward construction of new schools prior to issuance of construction permits in accordance with the rate schedule established by LUSD.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall coordinate with LUSD as required to assure that adequate school facilities will be available concurrently with the project-related need for such facilities, consistent with General Plan Public Facilities Goal 2, Policies 7, 8, and 9.

Parks and Recreation
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners. developers and/or successors-in-interest shall reserve two proposed sites for development of public parks, adjacent to the proposed elementary school site and adjacent to the WID canal, as shown on the Tentative Map (Figure 3-5), in conjunction with required payment of Public Facility Fees.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall reserve for public use and construct the 0.9-acre half­ circle park located within Village E; park improvements shall be subject to the approval of the City Parks Facility Planner/Landscape Architect. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall also construct a pedestrian/bikeway facility along the south levee of Bear Creek as specified in the Stockton Bikeway Plan.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall contribute Public Facility Fees. land or a combination of both in fulfillment of adopted parkland Public Facility Fee requirements.

Mitigation Measure 4. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall pay the applicable fee for Community Recreation Centers.

Mitigation Measure 5. Prior to recordation of any Final Map, the owners, developers and/or successors-in­ interest (ODS) shall form a new zone to the Stockton Consolidated Landscape Maintenance District 96 -2, and approve an assessment providing for the subdivision's proportionate share of the costs to maintain any public parks within the service area for this subdivision or serving this subdivision as well as the proposed 0.9-acre half-circle park to be developed by the ODS. ODS may request to annex to an existing zone of the Stockton Consolidated Landscape Maintenance District 96-2 provided the subdivision is within the service area of a park for which a zone of the Stockton Consolidated Landscape Maintenance District 96-2 has already been formed.

Formation of a new zone shall result in an assessment being established that includes, but not limited to, costs for: 1) annual maintenance of the park; and 2) administrative costs. The assessment levied shall contain a provision that will allow the maximum annual assessment to be increased in an amount equal to the greater of: 1) three percent (3%) or 2) the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco - Oakland - San Jose County Area for All Urban Consumers, as developed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, for a similar period.

Mitigation Measure 6. Prior to recordation of any Final Map, the ODS shall establish a maintenance entity acceptable to the Community Development Director, the Parks and Recreation Director and the Public Works Director to provide funding for the maintenance of, and if necessary replacement at the end of the useful life of, improvements including but not limited to common area landscaping, landscaping in the right-of-way, sound walls and/or back-up walls (all "Improvements") serving or for the special benefit of this subdivision.

If the ODS elects provide maintenance for the Improvements through a maintenance assessment district, the ODS shall form a new zone of the Stockton Consolidated Landscape Maintenance District 96 -2 that includes the entire subdivision. The entire subdivision may be considered for annexation to an existing zone of the Stockton Consolidated EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
112
Landscape Maintenance District 96-2, provided the type, intensity and amount of the Improvements to be maintained are similar to Improvements in the zone to which annexation is proposed. Formation/annexation shall result in an assessment being approved that shall be levied on all properties in the subdivision to ensure that all property owners pay their proportionate share of the costs of maintaining, in perpetuity, the Improvements serving or for the special benefit of this subdivision.

The assessment shall be established including, but not limited to, costs for: 1) annual maintenance of sound walls and back-up walls, public area landscaping and irrigation; 2) replacement of the wall(s) at the end of its useful life; and 3) administrative costs. The assessment levied shall contain a provision that will allow the maximum annual assessment to be increased in an amount equal to the greater to: 1) three percent (3%) or 2) the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco - Oakland - San Jose County Area for All Urban Consumers, as developed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, for a similar period. The owners, de velopers and/or successors in interest shall be responsible for maintenance of the Improvements until the District has generated sufficient revenue to fund the maintenance.

Mitigation Measure 7. All walls shall be located on private property and a separate maintenance easement shall be recorded for such walls. Such easement shall be sufficient to allow for regular maintenance (i.e., graffiti removal) and shall include the width of the support footing as it extends from both sides of the wall.

Mitigation Measure 8. The pedestrian/bike path along the Bear Creek levee system shall comply with applicable ADA requirements, including a wheelchair linkage to Holman Road.

Mitigation Measure 9. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall coordinate with PG&E to provide appropriate service sub­ outs to public park sites, subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation Department.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response PS-1 – PS-5):

Fire Protection
The Revised Project would add up to 617 residential units, which is anticipated to add approximately 1,974 people to the City of Stockton. The addition of up to 1,974 people in the City of Stockton would place additional demands for fire service on the Stockton Fire Department.

The City of Stockton General Plan includes policies and implementation measures to ensure that the Fire Department continues to provide adequate facilities and staffing levels. Below is a list of relevant policies:
• The City shall review development proposals for their impacts on infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, fire stations, libraries, streets) and require appropriate mitigation measures if development reduces service levels (Policy PFS-1.8).
• The City shall work to maintain a fire response time as indicated in Table 9-1, which shall be used to determine future fire station needs (Policy PFS-8.1). • The City shall continue to maintain an ISO rating of 1 (Policy PFS-8.2). • The City should provide fire station facilities, equipment (engines and other apparatus), and staffing necessary to maintain the City’s service standards (ISO rating and response time) (Policy PFS-8.3).
• The City shall require new development to pay all public facility fees (PFF) as a means to provide a fair share of costs to pro vide fire station facilities and equipment in order to maintain the City’s ISO rating of 1. Also, new development may be required to create a Community Facility District (CFD) or other funding mechanisms to pay the costs associated with the operation of a fire station (Policy PFS-8.4).

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
113
The Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification Program currently rates the Fire Department as 3 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the highest possible protection rating and 10 being the lowest. The ISO rating measures individual fire protection agencies against a Fire Suppression Rating Schedule, which includes such criteria as facilities and support for handling and dispatching fire alarms, first -alarm response and initial attack, and adequacy of local water supply for fire - suppression purposes.

Continued growth within the city will increase the overall demand for fire protection services in the city. Growth in accordance with buildout of the existing General Plan is expected to generate the typical range of service calls, including structure fires, car fires, electrical fires, emergency medical response and others. Any new facilities would require environmental review once a location and design of such facility is developed. The City’s costs to maintain equipment and facilities and to train and equip personnel will also increase. Growth in rural areas and fire districts will also increase the demand for fire protection services in those areas.

Development of the Revised Project, as proposed, could increase demand for fire protection services to the site, similar to the increase in demand for fire protection services to the site under the Original Project. The Revised Project would not expand the project footprint; rather, it would modify certain land u ses (such as from commercial to residential) , though it could result in a larger service population. Nevertheless, the modification of the on-site land uses is not anticipated to generate an increase in demand for fire protection services to the site as co mpared with the Original Project. It should be noted that the Fire Chief did not indicate that there would be a need for the Revised Project to construct a new fire station or physically alter a fire station, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for public services.

The Revised Project would be subject to Stockton Municipal Code Section 17.72.260, Public Facilities Fee, which requires payment of a public facilities fee on issuance of building permits for development in the City to pay for municipally owned facilities, including but not limited to fire stations (similar to the Original Project). Payment of the fee is required in order to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to mitigate the impacts caused by future development in the City. The payment of fees has been identified to finance public facilities and/or co mpensation measures, and to pay for each development’s fair share of the construction costs of these improvements, and/or the costs of the compensation measures. Payment of the public facilities fee in compliance with Municipal Code 16.72.260 would reduce potential impacts associated with the Revised Project’s contribution toward the future need for new or physically altered fire department facilities The Revised Project would not directly require the need for new or physically altered fire facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objective which may cause substantial adverse physical environmental impacts . Additionally, since the Revised Project would not expand the footprint of the Original Project, and since the new land uses associated with the Revised Project are not anticipated to generate a notable increase in the demand for fire protection services beyond that needed for the land uses associated with the Original Project, the Revised Project is anticipated to generate a similar level of demand for fire protection as the Original Project. This would be true even if the Revised Project would result in a larger service population than the service population anticipated within the Cannery Park EIR. Moreover, the Revised Project EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
114
would be required to implement the mitigation measures contained in the Cannery Park EIR, as applicable. Therefore, implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Police Protection
The Revised Project would add up to 617 residential units, which is anticipated to add approximately 1,974 people to the City of Stockton. The addition of up to 1,974 people in the City of Stockton would place add itional demands for fire service on the Stockton Police Department. The Police Department’s sworn staff totals 485, a ratio of about 1.52 sworn officers per 1,000 population.3 The Revised Project would generate jobs and residences within the Revised Project site. This potential increase in population and workers could contribute to the standard of sworn officers to residents being further exceeded. Further, development of the Revised Project site could increase the demand for police protection services to the site when compared to existing conditions. However, development of the Revised Project site, as proposed, would not result in significant growth beyond that identified and planned for in the City’s General Plan. Although demand for services may increase, the Revised Project would not directly increase demand for police services to the extent that new or physically altered police department facilities would be needed in order to ma intain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Moreover, the Revised Project would generate similar increases in demand for police protection services to the site as under the Original Project. This is because the Revised Project would not expand the project footprint; although it would modify certain land uses (such as from commercial to residential), the modification of the on -site land uses is not anticipated to generate a notable increase in demand for police protecti on services to the site as compared with the Original Project , regardless of any potential increase in service population.

The Revised Project would be subject to Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.72.260, Public Facilities Fee, which requires payment of a public facilities fee on issuance of building permits for development in the City to pay for municipally owned facilities, including but not limited to police stations.

Payment of the fee is required in order to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to mitigate the impacts caused by future development in the City. The payment of fees has been identified to finance public facilities and/or compensation measures, and to pay for each development’s fair share of the construction costs of t hese improvements, and/or the costs of the compensation measures. Payment of the public facilities fee in compliance with Municipal Code

17.72.260 would reduce potential impacts associated with the Revised Project’s contribution toward the future need for new or physically altered police department facilities. Furthermore, it should be noted that the demand for police protection services under the Revised Project is anticipated to be similar to the Original Project.

The Revised Project would not directly require the need for new or physically altered police facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objective which may cause substantial adverse physical environmental impacts . Additionally, since the Revised

3 According to the Cal. State DOF, Stockton’s population 318,522 on January 1, 2020.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
115
Project would not expand the footprint of the Original Project, and since the new land uses associated with the Revised Project are not anticipated to generate a notable increase in the demand for fire protection services beyond that needed for the land u ses associated with the Original Project, the Revised Project is anticipated to generate a similar level of demand for fire protection as the Original Project within the Revised Project site . Moreover, the Revised Project would be required to implement the mitigation measures contained in the Cannery Park EIR (listed below), as applicable.

Therefore, implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant relative to this topic.

Schools
The Revised Project site is located within the service boundaries of the Lodi Unified School District (LUSD). LUSD provides school services for grades K through 12 within the communities of Lodi, North Stockton, and the communities of Acampo, Clements, Lockeford, Vict or, and Woodbridge.

Students would attend Mosher Elementary School, Morada Middle School, and McNair High School.

The LUSD collects impact fees from new developments under the provisions of the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998, enacted by Sen ate Bill 50 (“SB 50”). SB 50 restricts the ability of local agencies to deny or condition land use approvals on the basis that school facilities are inadequate and precludes local agencies from requiring anything other than payment of the prevailing developer fee adopted by the local school district. SB 50 sets forth the “exclusive methods of considering and mitigating impacts on school facilities” resulting from any planning and/or development project, regardless of whether its character is legislative, ad judicative, or both. Govt.

Code § 65996(a) (emphasis added).

Section 65995(h) provides that “[t]he payment or satisfaction of a fee, charge, or other requirement levied or imposed pursuant to Section 17620 of the Education Code in the amount specified in Section 65995 … is hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real property … on the provision of adequate school facili ties.” (emphasis added). The reference in Section 65995(h) to fees “imposed pursuant to Section 17620 of the Education Code in the amount specified in Section 65995” is to per-square-foot school fees that can be imposed by school districts on new residenti al and commercial and industrial construction. Pursuant to this authority, the District has adopted Level 1 fees. Payment of this Level 1 fee by the Project applicant constitutes full and complete mitigation of all impacts of the proposed Project on the District’s school facilities as a matter of law. (Gov't Code § 659959h).) Therefore, none of the proposed revisions to the project would result in new schools impacts or increase the severity of any impacts related to schools, above what was described in the Cannery Park EIR. Implementation of the proposed Project would have a less than significant relative to this topic.

Parks
CEQA requires that the Revised Project is analyzed to determine whether any substantial adverse impacts would be associated with any new or physically altered governmental facilities that may be required to serve the Revised Project (in this case, for park and recreation facilities). T he Revised Project directly increases the number of persons in the area as a result of employment potential, and residential uses. The Revised Project includes up to 617 residential units, which is projected to increase the population by up to an estimated 1,974 people (based on 3.20 persons per household).

Pursuant to the Quimby Act (as described in more detail below) , the Revised Project is required to EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
116
provide sufficient land dedicated for parks and/or pay the relevant in -lieu park fees, based on the project’s residential density.

The Revised Project includes the development of the 7.18-acre Lot A, which includes parkland and a stormwater basin. The Revised Project also includes open space along the north boundary adjacent to Bear Creek.

For the purposes of collecting fees to mitigate for increase park demands (Quimby Act), the California Government Code Section 66477 states: The amount of land dedicated or fees paid shall be based upon the residential density, which shall be determined on the basis of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map or parcel map and the average number of persons per household. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that the average number of persons per household by units in a structure is the same as that disclosed by the most recent available federal census or a census taken pursuant to Chapter 17 (commencing with Section 40200) of Part 2 of Division 3 of Title 4.

The Revised Project is a General Plan amendment and rezone of a portion of the Original Project. The Revised Project does not create or modify any parkland or open space other than what is described above, and does not eliminate any parkland or open space identified in the Original Project.

Furthermore, although the Revised Project is anticipated to generate additional residential land uses (at the expense of commercial land uses) compared to Original Project within the Revised Project site, which would require a combination of either more park land and/or payment of in-lieu park fees (subject to the requirements of the Quimby Act), none of the proposed revisions to the project would result in new parks impacts or increase the severity of any impacts related to parks, beyond what was described in the Cannery Park EIR . Moreover, the Revised Project woul d be required to implement the mitigation measures contained in the Cannery Park EIR (listed below), as applicable.

Therefore, w ith implementation of mitigation measures contained in the Cannery Park EIR , the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Other Public Facilities
The Revised project would not result in a need for other facilities that are not addressed above, or in Section XVIII, Utilities and Service Systems. Implementation of the Revised Project would hav e no impact relative to this issue.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
117

3.16 RECREATION
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact REC-1: Would the
project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that
substantial physical
deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
N/A No No No No
Impact REC-2: Does the project
include recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the
environment?
N/A No No No No

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to recreation. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density res idential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

As described in the Cannery Park EIR , the project would not result in any impacts related to recreation facilities. None of the proposed revisions to the project would result in new recreation impacts or increase t he severity of any impacts related to recreation. Impacts related to this topic would remain unchanged from the analysis in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation requirements are required for the project revisions.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
118
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses REC-1): The Revised Project would result in the construction of up to 617 single-family residential units, which would result in up to an estimated 1,974 individuals. The Revised Project is a General Plan amendment and rezone of a portion of the Original Project.

The Revised Project includes the development of the 7.18-acre Lot A, which is anticipated to include parkland and a stormwater basin. The Revised Project also includes open space along the north boundary adjacent to Bear Creek, and bike/pedestrian access to the Bear Creek levee system. The Revised Project is not anticipated to create or modify any other parkland or open space other than what is described above, and is also not anticipated to eliminate any parkland or open space as identified in the Original Project. Park in-lieu fees would ultimately fund the construction of new park land to offset the increased demand for these facilities , as required under State law , as applicable .

Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact associated with this environmental topic.

Responses REC-2): Beyond the park facilities described above, the Revised Project does not include the construction of recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adve rse physical effect on the environment. Implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
119

3.17 TRANSPORTATION
Environmental Issue Area Conclusion
in Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact TRA-1: Conflict with a
program plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact TRA-2: Would the
project conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact TRA-3: Substantially
increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures
Impact TRA-4: Result in
inadequate emergency access?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See
Cannery
Park EIR
Mitigation
Measures

Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to transportation impacts. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate

11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high d ensity residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low den sity residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed for di sturbance would not change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. No changes to potential impacts to transportation impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Cannery Park EIR mitigation measures (listed below). These mitigation measures would be required EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
120
by the project revisions, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measur es are required for the project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Traffic Impacts under EPAP Plus Project Conditions
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall be responsible for 100% of the design and construction costs of on -site roadway and intersection improvements, roadway extensions and frontage improvements along Eight Mile Road and West SR 99 Frontage Road (See Table 16-12).

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall be responsible for design and construction costs of off­ site roadway and intersection improvements recommended under the EPAP Plus Project scenario and required to accommodate traffic generated by the project in the near-term, subject to reimbursement or Public Facility Fee credits, subject to applicable reimbursement, as identified in Table 16- 12.

Mitigation Measure 3. Phasing of improvements shall be allowed subject to completion of a phasing analysis approved by the City.

Mitigation Measure 4. Golfview Road and the first driveway from Lot A shall be a signalized intersection, and shall align at Eight Mile Road.

Project Consistency with Eight Mile Road Specific Plan
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall relocate or eliminate some or all of the new access points, limit turning movements, coordinate signal timing, add acceleration/deceleration lanes or make other improvements as required to reduce potential inconsistency with the Eight Mile Road Specific Plan to a less than significant level.

Sight Distance
Mitigation Measure 1. Design of the Eight Mile Road grade separation shall include consideration of vertical curvature with respect to Caltrans design standards, the vertical curvature of the grade separation should be reduced if necessary to achieve adequate sight distance.

Cumulative Traffic Impacts
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest shall be responsible for their proportionate share of the design and construction costs of off -site roadway and intersection improvements recommended under the cumulative Plus Project scenario.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Me asures
Response TRA-1 – TRA-2): Less than Significant. As directed by the City of Stockton, Fehr & Peers prepared a VMT Impact Assessment for the Revised Project on March 31, 2022. The VMT Impact Assessment for the Revised Project is provided in Appendix C. The VMT Impact Assessment for the Revised Project compared the impacts of the Revised Project to those of the Original Project. Both projects include a mix of uses, including residential, office/industrial/employment uses, and retail uses. Therefore, the following thresholds from the Stockton Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (Interim) are used in this assessment:

The Revised Project would have a significant impact if:

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
121
a. The Revised Project’s residential uses exceed baseline citywide home -based VMT per resident minus 15% and the proposed Project’s residential uses have a home-based VMT per resident that is higher than the Original Project; or b. The Revised Project’s office/employmen t uses exceed baseline citywide home -based work VMT per employee minus 15% and the Revised Project’s office/employment uses have a home-based work VMT per employee that is higher than the Original Project; or c. The Revised Project would increase total citywide VMT relative to the VMT generated by the Original Project
While the Revised Project proposes changes only to a portion of the Original Project Area, because VMT is affected by the totality of land uses within a Revised Project site and a region, the VMT analysis prepared by Fehr & Peers provides a comparison of the complete Original Project and the complete Revised Project (i.e., including the uses in those areas that are not changed with the Revised Project).

This approach captures the full effect of the change in uses with the Revised Project. However, Fehr & Peers also analyzed the VMT impacts when considering just the change in uses that would be changed by the p Revised Project, to provide additional information on the VMT effects of the Revised Project.

The results of the VMT analysis prepared by Fehr and Peers identifies that, under the Baseline With Project VMT results comparing the Revised Project as a whole (i.e., the full Cannery Park site) to the Original Project and the citywide average, while neither the Original nor the Revised Project produces VMT per capita that is 15 percent below the citywide average, the home -based VMT per resident is lower with the Revised Project than with the Original Project (21.59 versus 21.63). However, the home-based work VMT per worker is slightly higher with the Revised Project than with the Original Project (21.86 versus 21.77).

Under the Baseline With Project VMT results comparing just the changed areas between the Original Project and the Revised Project, alongside the citywide average, neither the Original Project nor the Revised Project produces VMT per capita that is 15 percent below the citywide average. However, both the home-based VMT per resident and the home -based work VMT per worker are lower with the Revised Project than with the Original Project (21.91 versus 23.56 for the residential VMT, and

20.91 versus 21.84 for the worker VMT).

Under the total citywide VMT under Baseline With Project and Cumulative (2040) With Project conditions, for the Revised Project and the Original Project, the Revised Project results in lower VMT than the Original Project in both scenarios.

Based on the above findings, and City direction to conduct this assessment as a comparison of the Revised Project impacts to the Original Project’s impacts, the VMT impact can be considered less than significant. The only metric by which the proposed Project results in higher VMT than the Original Project is the Baseline With Project home -based work VMT per worker. Since this metric is lower with the Revised Project than the Original Project under Cumulative conditions, and the metric is lower with the Revised Project than the Original Project when considering just the areas that would change, and the Revised Project results in lower citywide VMT than the Original Project under both Baseline and Cumulative conditions, the impact with respect to VMT can be considered less than significant. Furthermore, it should be noted that the Original Project was part of the General Plan EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
122
baseline for land uses in the region; the revisions associated with the VMT Impact Assessment for the Revised Project also reflect the General Plan baseline.

The Revised Project would also be consistent with the City of Stockton General Plan in terms of provisions for roadways, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Revised Project would not conflict with other road, transit bicycle or pedestrian plans documented by the city.

Therefore, impacts associated with the potential to conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy or conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) would be less than significant.

Responses TRA-3 – TRA-4): Less than Significant. The area of the Revised Project located north of Bear Creek will have access to Holman Road by way of a public street, and access to Eight Mile Road by way of a public street. The area of the Revised Project located south of Bear Creek will have two accesses to PFC Jesse Mizener Street by way of public streets (PFC Jesse Mizener Street extends from Holman Road eastward to the SR99 West Frontage Road). There will not be any direct access to the Frontage Road and only one point of access to Holman Road.

The driveways would be designed and constructed per local design standards and requirements, consistent with accepted design guidelines for safety, and therefore would not be anticipated to introduce hazardous geometric design features. The Revised Project driveways will be required to have adequate site distance. Connection spacing and site distance adequacy should be confirmed when the detailed improvement plans and a final map are submitted.

The internal Project streets will be designed to meet the City’ s geometric design standards of the roadway to avoid creating hazardous driving conditions. In addition, a traffic calming analysis will be conducted to create safer streets through the implementation of the Cit’s Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP).

The internal Project streets will be designed to meet the City’s geometric design standards to avoid creating hazardous driving conditions.

The internal Project streets will provide ADA compliant sidewalk along each side of the roadways so that pedestrians would be separated from vehicle traffic per city standards.

Proposed roadway geometries/cross-sections and design features will be reviewed as part of final maps and improvement plan review to confirm that proposed designs are consistent with the l ocal code and design standards and confirm that design features (such as trees, fountains, on -street parking, etc.) do not limit site distance. All streets are designed to accommodate emergency vehicles.

As parcels adjacent to the Revised Project site deve lop in the future, the Revised Project site plan allows for future street connections to the north which would provide additional emergency access routes.

Therefore, impacts associated with design features and emergency access would be less than significant.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
123

3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Environmental
Issue Area
Conclusion in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact TCR-1:

Listed or eligible
for listing in the
California
Register of
Historical
Resources, or in a
local register of
historical
resources as
defined in Public
Resources Code
Section
5020.1(k)?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact TRC-2:

A resource
determined by the
lead agency, in its
discretion and
supported by
substantial
evidence, to be
significant
pursuant to
criteria set forth
in subdivision (c)
of Public
Resources Code
Section 5024.1? In
applying the
criteria set forth
in subdivision (c)
of Public
Resources Code
Section 5024.1,
the lead agency
shall consider the
significance of the
resources to a
California Native
American tribe.

Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to tribal cultural resources. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88-acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce resident ial uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re-designate

11.27 acres of high density residential lan d located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
124
residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed for disturbance would not change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. As such, no changes to potential impacts to tribal cultural resources would occur as a result of the proposed proje ct revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. The Cannery Park EIR requires the project to implement the Canner y Park EIR mitigation measures (see Section 3.5 Cultural Resources), which includes standard measures that m ust be implemented if a previously unknown tribal cultural resources is encountered during site grading and construction activities. These mitigation measures would be required by the project revisions and would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level, as described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses TRC-1 – TRC-2): The Revised Project is within the same footprint of the Original Project.

As described in the EIR for the Original Project, a search of existing records at the Central California Information Center failed to identify information concerning prehistoric (or historic-period) sites or features within the Original Project site, in spite of some previous surveys of sensitive areas along Bear Creek. Consultation with the Native American Heritage Commission failed to identify any sacred land listings for this area, and no pre historic or historic resources were identified during the field survey of the Original Project site. Revised Project disturbance of the Revised Project site is not expected to result in a significant effect on tribal cultural resources.

However, as with mo st projects in the region that involve ground -disturbing activities, there is the potential for discovery of previously unknown tribal cultural resources, including prehistoric artifacts. With implementation of the mitigation measures contained within the Cannery Park EIR, the potential impact would be less than significant with respect to cultural resources.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
125

3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve
new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New
information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact UTIL-1:

Require or result in the
relocation or
construction of new or
expanded water,
wastewater or storm
water drainage, electric
power, natural gas, or
telecommunications
facilities, the
construction or
relocation of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact UTIL-2: Have
sufficient water supplies
available to serve the
project and reasonably
foreseeable future
development during
normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact UTIL-3: Result
in a determination by
the wastewater
treatment provider
which serves or may
serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to
serve the projects
projected demand in
addition to the
providers existing
commitments?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact UTIL-4:

Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess
of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the
attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
Impact UTIL-5:

Comply with federal,
state, and local
management and
reduction statutes and
regulations related to
solid waste?
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
No No No See Cannery Park
EIR Mitigation
Measures
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
126
Discussion
The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original P roject sought to increase commercial uses and reduce residential uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential land locate d south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acr es of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The proposed project changes would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to utilities and service systems. The area of disturbance of the Revised Project would not be larger than that analyzed within the Original Project . Furthermore, although the Revised Project would replace commercial uses with residential uses, the demand for utilities for the residential uses would not be substantially different from the formerly proposed commercial uses associated with the Original Project. Additionally, the Revised Project would still be subject to the requirements of the mitigation measures (listed below) included within the Cannery Park EIR. This mitigation measures contained within the Cannery Park EIR would still be required and enforced. No new mitigation measures are required for the Revised Project revisions.

Mitigation Measures adopted with the Cannery Park EIR
Project Effects on Treatment Plant Capacity
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall, prior to issuance of building permits, pay the applicable Sewer Connection Fees required for improvements to the Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facilities.

Project Effects on Wastewater Collection System Capacity and Availability Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developers and/or successors -in-interest shall design and construct off-site wastewater collection system improvements needed to serve the proposed protect.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that sewage generation by the proposed project can be accommodated within planned collection system improvements, or shall design and construct necessary improvements to the system to accommodate anticipated sewage generation. Limits on the development of "wet" uses shall be included in the Developm ent Agreement.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall obtain al! required permits for crossings of Bear Creek and WID irrigation canals.

Project Effects on Domestic Water Distribution System
Mitigation Measure 1. The owners, developer and/or successors­in-interest shall pay all applicable water connection fees.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
127
Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developer and/or successors­ in-interest shall design and construct, and provide easements for, any required water system improvements needed to serve approved development, in accordance with City standards and master water plans.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developer and/or successors­ in-interest shall construct master planned water system facilities within the annexation area boundaries, subject to reimbursement where applicable.

Mitigation Measure 4. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall dedicate two sites acceptable to the Municipal Utilities Director for future domestic water wells to the City of Stockton.

Mitigation Measure 5. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that City water pressure and fire flow requirements can be met by the planned water system improvements of the proposed project.

Availability of Urban Storm Drainage Services
Mitigation Measure 1. The proposed Storm Drainage Master Plan and any necessary revisions to citywide plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, Director of Municipal Utilities and/or City Council, as required.

Mitigation Measure 2. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall design and construct elements of the Storm Drainage Master Plan as required to serve development of the project site.

Mitigation Measure 3. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall obtain all necessary permits for storm drainage crossings of Bear Creek and construction of the Bear Creek pump station and discharge, including permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers, the State Reclamation Board and the California Department of Fish and Game.

Mitigation Measure 4. The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the storm water runoff generated by the proposed project can be accommodated with the planned storm water collection system improvements, as provided by the City's Standard Plans and Specifications.

Consistency with Storm Water Quality Regulation
Mitigation Measure 1. The property owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall demonstrate compliance with the City Code Sections 7 - 859, 7 -859.1, 7 -859.2 and o ther applicable code sections to the Municipal Utilities Department to ensure that sufficient post­construction storm water pollution prevention practices have been incorporated into the project design.

Mitigation Measure 2. The property owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to the State to address permanent storm water pollution prevention practices. These Plans shall be developed during the project design phase and submitted and approved prior to the start of construction.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Responses UTIL-1 – UTIL-3):

Water
The provision of public services and the construction of onsite infrastructure improvements would be required to accommodate the development of the Revised Project. Water distribution will be by an underground distribution system to be installed as per the City of Stockton standards and specifications.

The Cannery Park EIR analyzed the Original Project, which includes (but is not limited) to the Revised Project site. Overall, the Cannery Park EIR identified the Original Project would generate a total of approximately 890.9 acre-feet per year of water demand. However, the Original Project analyzed the EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
128
entire 489.40 acres of the Original Project, while the Revised Project only encompasses 99.88 acres of the area analyzed within the Original Project EIR. Table UTIL-1, below, provides the water demand estimate for just the Original Project within the Revised Project site. As shown in Table UTIL-1, below, the total water demand for the Original Project just within the Revised Project site would be approximately 224.6 acre-feet per year (afy).

TABLE UTIL-1: WATER DEMAND FOR THE ORIGINAL PROJECT WITHIN THE REVISED PROJECT SITE

LAND USE ACRES ACRE-FEET PER ACRE
(ANNUAL)

ACRE-FEET (ANNUAL)
Industrial 0 2.0 0.0
Commercial 88.61 2.0 177.2
Low-Med Density
Residential 0 2.4 0.0
High Density Residential 11.27 4.2 47.3
Total 99.88 224.6
Source: Cannery Park Development EIR
For comparison, the Revised Project water demand within the Revised Project site is provided by Table UTIL-2, below. As shown in Table UTIL-2, the total water demand for the Revised Project would be approximately 192 acre-feet per year (afy).

TABLE UTIL-2: WATER DEMAND FOR THE REVISED PROJECT WITHIN THE REVISED PROJECT SITE

LAND USE UNITS (DU OR ACRES) WATER USE FACTOR
(ANNUAL)

ACRE-FEET (ANNUAL)
Industrial 0 2.0 0.0
Commercial 19.76 Acres 1.62 AFY/acre 35
Low-Med Density
Residential 331 DU 242 gpd/DU

0.27 AFY/DU 95
High Density Residential 296 DU 175 gpd/DU

0.20 AFY/DU 63
Total 617 DU – Residential
(19.72 acres Commercial 192
Source: Cannery Park Project Water Supply Assessment, City of Stockton/West Yost, December 2022, As shown in Table UTIL -1 and Table UTIL -2, the Revised Project within the Revised Project site is anticipated to demand approximately 32.6 acre-feet per year of water demand less than the Original Project assumed for development within the Revised Project site.

The Revised Project would require extension of offsite water conveyance infrastructure to the Project site for potable water and irrigation water, like the Original Project. All offsite water utilit y improvements would be constructed in accordance with the City’s 2021 Water Master Plan Update adopted February 23, 2021, in or adjacent to existing roadways along the perimeter of the Revised Project site, thereby limiting any potential impact to areas t hat were not already disturbed.

Improvements identified in the Water Master Plan Update include a 24-inch diameter potable water transmission pipeline along Eight Mile Road Project frontage and along the State Route 99 Frontage Road frontage between Eight Mile Road and PFC Jesse Mizener Street. The pipeline will cross under the UPRR tracks adjacent to the existing Eight Mile Road overcrossing and will cross Bear Creek either over the creek on the existing Eight Mile Road bridge or under the creek adjacent t o existing rights-of-way for frontage roads. Stubs from the transmission pipeline will be constructed as EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
129
required by the City to connect to the Project water distribution system and to a future City well site that may be constructed adjacent to Holman Road depending on the future system needs. The Project may also construct a parallel distribution pipeline for connection of fire hydrants along project frontage roads as required by the City, with interconnection to the transmission pipeline as required.

The Project may also construct additional 30-inch and 24-inch diameter potable water transmission pipelines as identified in the 2021 Water Master Plan Update along West Lane from just south of Bear Creek, undercrossing Bear Creek and continuing north to Eight Mile Road, and from West Lane to the Project boundary along Eight Mile Road. These additional potable water transmission pipelines would also include stubs for connection to City -approved development projects and may include stubs for a future parallel distribution pipeline for fire hydrants along West Lane and Eight Mile Road.

Water supply will be provided by the City of Stockton, which includes surface and ground water supplies. Water distribution will be by an underground distribution system installed as per the City of Stockton standards and specifications.

The Revised Project would not require the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing water treatment facilities for water service. While the Revised Project would require construction of new water collection and distribution facilities, t he construction of these facilities would not result in significant environmental effects. The environmental impacts of the new facilities are analyzed throughout th e Cannery Park EIR. Moreover, the Revised Project water infrastructure would not notably different from the water infrastructure proposed in the EIR for the Original Project. Lastly, while the Revised Project is anticipated to generate more water demand than the Original Project (within the Revised Project site), as shown in Tables UTIL-1 and UTIL-2, none of the proposed revisions to the project would result in new impacts or increase the severity of any significant impacts related to water demand. Overall, implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Wastewater
The City of Stockton owns and operates a wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system, and provides sanitary sewerage service to the City of Stockton. On April 1, 2020, the RWQCB adopted Waste Discharge R equirements (WDRs) Board Order Number R5 -2020-0007, NPDES CA0079138, prescribing waste discharge requirements for the City of Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility (RWCF).

The RWCF provides secondary and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater from throughout the City. The remainder of the City is served by on -site septic systems, or lie outside the urban service area. As of 2015, RWCF processes an average of 33 mgd. The treated wastewater is discharged into the San Joaquin River.

To account f or the additional wastewater flows in the Project site after the construction of the Revised Project, additions to the existing wastewater infrastructure will be needed. The sanitary sewer collection will be by an underground collection system installed as per the City of Stockton standards and specifications. Sanitary sewer disposal will flow to the City’s RWCF for treatment.

Improvements include connection to existing sanitary sewer lines.

The City of Stockton’s wastewater treatment system is currently in compliance with the waste discharge requirements of Order Number R5 -2020-0007, NPDES CA0079138. The wastewater treatment system options covered under this Order include: City of Stockton RWCF, including discharge to the San Joaquin River. The development of the Revised Project under this permitted option would not exceed the wastewater discharge requirements in this Order.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
130
The City's 2022 Wastewater Master Plan Update includes projected wastewater generation factors for commercial and industrial land uses. The 2022 Water Master Plan Update also provides overall projected water demand for the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities District (COSMUD) service area.

Current dry weather flows at the facility are estimated to be on the order of 35 mgd. The RWCF has capacity to serve anticipated development within the City and is currently undergoing construction of the Modifications Project to change to an activated sludge proce ss to meet the State's stringent new 2014 standards to meet lower nitrate concentrations by June 1, 2024. The Modifications Project also replaces equipment and processes that are 40 to 70 years old and beyond their useful life.

Scheduled for completion in 2023, the Modifications Project is modernizing the RWCF to support the community and accommodate growth, initially through 2035 with the ability to expand through 2045 and beyond. The improvements provide a wastewater treatment capacity of 40.2 million gallons per day (mgd) average dry-weather flow (ADWF) with accommodations for future expansion to 48 mgd.

The Modifications Project broke ground on October 8, 2019 and has completed several key steps each year toward completion.

Table UTIL-3, below, provides the wastewater demand estimate for just the Original Project within the Revised Project site. As shown in Table UTIL -3, below, the total wastewater demand for the Original Project just within the Revised Project site would be approximately 329,252 gallons per day.

TABLE UTIL-3: WASTEWATER DEMAND FOR THE ORIGINAL PROJECT WITHIN THE REVISED PROJECT SITE

LAND USE
ACRES

GENERATION RATE
(GALLONS/DAY/ACRE)

GENERATION
(GALLON/DAY)

INFLOW/INFILTRATION
(400

GALLONS/DAY/ACRE)
Industrial 0 3000 - -
Commercial 88.61 2400 212,664 248,108
Low-Med Density
Residential 0 2100 - -
High Density
Residential 11.27 6800 76,636 81,144
Total 99.88 289,300 329,252
Source: Cannery Park Development EIR
For comparison, the Revised Project wastewater demand within the Revised Project site is provided by Table UTIL -4, below. As shown in Table UTIL -4, the total wastewater demand for the Original Project within the Revised Project site would be approximately 313,626 gallons per day.

TABLE UTIL-4: WASTEWATER DEMAND FOR THE REVISED PROJECT WITHIN THE REVISED PROJECT SITE

LAND USE ACRES GENERATION RATE
(GALLONS/DAY/ACRE)

GENERATION
(GALLON/DAY)

INFLOW/INFILTRATION
(400

GALLONS/DAY/ACRE)
Industrial 0 3000 - -
Commercial 19.76 2400 47,424 55,328
Low-Med Density
Residential 67.78 2100 142,338 169,450
High Density
Residential 12.34 6800 83,912 88,848
Total 99.88 273,674 313,626
Source: Cannery Park Development EIR
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
131
As shown in Table UTIL -3 and Table UTIL -4, the Revised Project within the Revised Project site is anticipated to generate approximately 16,626 gallons per year of wastewater less than the Original Project with the Revised Project site.

Municipal wastewater collection and treatment would also be provided by the City of Stockton. The site is within the City Urban Service Area and has been included in the City’s Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. The Revised Project would be located within System 10 sub -area of the City of Stockton wastewater collection system. This plan has anticipated the extension of municipal wastewater collection and treatment service for the Revised Project site. The Project would construct wastewater infrastructure in accordance with the 202 2 Wastewater Master Plan Update.

Improvements would include a pump station located north of Bear Creek on the east side of Holman Road to convey Project effluent from tributary areas north of Bear Creek through an 8-inch diameter sewer force main south alon g Holman Road, crossing Bear Creek within the existing Holman Road bridge, terminating at a manhole structure within Holman Road on the south side of Bear Creek.

Flows would continue south within the Holman Road right-of-way through gravity sewer conveyance pipelines. Effluent from tributary areas south of Bear Creek would be collected and conveyed through gravity sewer pipelines. All sewer collection and conveyance infrastructure would be sized and constructed according to adopted City of Stockton sewer hy drologic and hydraulic design criteria, design standards, and specifications. The proposed sewer pump station would include a standby natural gas generator to maintain service in the event of power outages and would be designed with full redundancy to oper ate with the largest pump out of service for routine maintenance or replacement.

Occupancy of the Revised Project would be prohibited without sewer allocation, as required by section 13.12.100, Mandatory Sanitary Service Required, of the City’s Municipal Code. An issuance of sewer allocation from the City’s available capacity would ensure that there would be a final determination by the wastewater treatment and/or collection provider that there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed Project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. Additionally, any planned expansion to the RWCF with a subsequent allocation of capacity to the Revised Project would ensure that there would not be a determination by the wastewater treatment and/ or collection provider that there is inadequate capacity to serve the Revised Project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. Moreover, the Revised Project would be required to pay all applicable public facility fees to devel opment the Project site. Lastly, as shown in Tables UTIL -3 and UTIL -4, the Revised Project is anticipated to generate less wastewater than the Original Project (within the Revised Project site). Overall, none of the proposed revisions to the project would result in new impacts or increase the severity of any impacts related to wastewater demand. Overall, implementation of the Revised Project would have a less than significant impact relative to this topic.

Storm Drainage
Flooding events can result in damage to structures, injury or loss of human and animal life, exposure of waterborne diseases, and damage to infrastructure. In addition, standing floodwater can destroy agricultural crops, undermine infrastructure and struct ural foundations, and contaminate groundwater. The levee system along Bear Creek is designed to a 100-year protection standard. The Revised Project site is not located within the 100 -year floodplain as delineated on the most recent flood plain maps for Stockton.

Areas of proposed development within the Revised Project site will be required to meet the "volume reduction” and “trash control” requirements of the City's most recent stormwater NPDES permit.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
132
Units of development would incorporate design features that would divert storm water to the groundwater system and/or detain runoff before it reaches the collection system. These design features would include measures also described as Low Impact Development (LID) and Volume Reduction Measures, such as grassy swales, porous pavement, rain barrels, and rain gardens, among others. Compliance with the City's stormwater standards will require that storm drainage from new development be reduced below "existing runoff" rates. In addition, units of development woul d incorporate design features to comply with the City’s stormwater standards for trash control.

Examples of potential design features include hydrodynamic separators, trash screens, or LID measures which are capable of trapping all particles five millimeters in size or greater.

The Revised Project includes development of a new storm drainage system to serve the Revised Project site. It should be noted that the storm drainage system for the Revised Project would be similar to the storm drainage system for th e Original Project, as analyzed in the Cannery Park Development EIR. Overall, compliance with federal, State, and local standards and regulations would ensure that that the Revised Project would not result in substantial erosion, siltation, surface runoff, flooding, or polluted runoff and that the impact would be less than significant.

Responses UTIL-4 – UTIL-5): The permitted maximum disposal at the Forward Landfill is 8,668 tons per day. The total permitted capacity of the Forward Landfill is 51.04 million cubic yards, which was expected to accommodate an operational life until January 1, 2021. An expansion was approved by the Board of Supervisors in early 2020 to extend the life of the landfill, extending its lifespan from 2030 to 2036 according to Republic Services 4. The remaining capacity is 22,100,000 cubic yards.

Solid waste generated by the proposed Project was estimated based on CalRecycle generation rate estimates by use (discussed below). The permitted maximum disposal at the Foothill Landfill is 1,500 tons per day. The remaining capacity is 125,000,000 cubic yards with an anticipated closure year of 2055. The permitted maximum disposal at the North County Landfill is 1,200 tons per day. The remaining capacity is 35,400,000 cubic yards with an anticipated closure year of 2048.

The commercial portion of the Revised Project site is estimated to generate roughly five pounds per day per 1,000 square feet. It is estimated that the 737,346 square feet of commercial space (lot size) would generate approximately 3,687 pounds per day (1.84 tons per day) of solid waste. However, it should be noted that this may be an overestimate, as this estimate is based on the overall lot size for the commercial portion of the Revised Project site, rather than just the total commercial floor space.

The residential uses of the Revised Project are estimated to generate roughly 10 pounds per day per household. It is estimated that the up to 617 proposed residential units would generate 6,170 pounds per day (3.09 tons per day) of solid waste.

The total solid waste generated by the Revised Project is estimated to be 4. 93 tons per day. This amount is similar to the amount that would be anticipated f or the Original Project. As previously described, solid waste generated in the City is disposed at the Forward Landfill. This landfill was projected to close in the year 2021. As mentioned above, an expansion was approved by the Board of Supervisors earlier this year to extend the life of the landfill, from 2030 to 2036 according to Republic Services. The City’s solid waste per capita generation has decreased since 2007 due to the waste

4 E.A. Crunden, Republic Landfill Expansion Moves Ahead in California After Failed Appeal. WasteDive.

Published January 10, 2020. Accessed: <https://www.wastedive.com/news/republic -landfill-expansion- california-san-joaquin/570033/>
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
133
diversion efforts of the City. The permitted maximum disposal at the Fo rward Landfill is 8,668 tons per day. The permitted vehicle limit is 620 vehicles per day; however, the landfill averages 212 daily trucks.5 The remaining capacity of the landfill is 22.1 million cubic yards. The addition of solid waste associated with th e Revised Project, approximately 9, 857 pounds or 4. 93 tons per day at total buildout, to the Forward Landfill would not exceed the landfill’s remaining capacity.

All development in the City of Stockton is required to have solid waste service pursuant to Section

8.04.020 of the City Municipal Code. Solid waste service for the Revised Project would be provided by the City’s contracted providers. Moreover, the solid waste generated by the Revised Project is not anticipated to be substantially different than the solid waste anticipated for the Original Project.

Therefore, impacts related to solid waste would be less than significant.

5 San Joaquin County Community Development Department. Draft Environmental Impact Report – Forward Landfill Expansion (SCH#2008052024). September 2012. Page III -13.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
134

3.20 WILDFIRE
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in
Cannery
Park EIR
Does the
Project
involve new
impacts?
New
circumstances
involving new
impacts?
New information
requiring new
analysis or
verification?
Mitigation
Required?
Impact WF-1:

Substantially impair an
adopted emergency
response plan or
emergency evacuation
plan?
N/A No No No No
Impact WF-2: Due to
slope, prevailing winds,
and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose
project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
N/A No No No No
Impact WF-2 Require
the installation or
maintenance of
associated infrastructure
(such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or
that may result in
temporary or ongoing
impacts to the
environment?
N/A No No No No
Impact WF-3 Expose
people or structures to
significant risks, including
downslope or
downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage
changes?
N/A No No No No
Discussion
The Revised Project would not result in any new or altered impacts with respect to wildfire. The Revised Project requests a General Plan Amendment and rezone to revise the land use and zoning designations established by the Original Project within the 99.88 -acre Revised Project site. The Original Project sought to increase commercial uses and reduce resident ial uses on the Revised Project site. The Revised Project General Plan Amendment would: 1) re -designate 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) re -designate 11.27 acres of high density residential lan d located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) re -designate 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The Revised Project rezone would: 1) rezone 56.51 acres of commercial land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, 2) rezone 11.27 acres of high density residential EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
135
land located south of Bear Creek for low density residential uses, and 3) rezone 12.34 acres of commercial located north of Bear Creek for high density residential uses. The net change is an increase in housing units and a decrease in commercial land. The housing intensity in the 11.27 acres of high density residential that will be downzoned to low density residential, will be replaced with a net increase in high density residential but in a different location within the Revised Project site.

The footprint of the project and the areas proposed for disturbance would not change from the conditions addressed in the Cannery Park EIR. As such, no changes to potential impacts related to wildfire would occur as a result of the proposed project revisions compared to the potential impacts described in the Cannery Park EIR. No new mitigation measures are required for the project revisions.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Response WF-1): The Revised Project site will connect to an existing network of City streets. The proposed circulation improvements would allow for greater emergency access relative to existing conditions. The Revised Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, impacts from project implementation would be considered less than significant relative to this topic.

Response WF-2): The risk of wildfire is related to a variety of parameters, including fuel loading (vegetation), fire weather (winds, temperatures, humidity levels and fuel moisture contents) and topography (degree of slope). Steep slopes contribute to fire hazard by intensifying the effects of wind and making fire suppression difficult. Fuels such as grass are highly flammable because they have a high surface area to mass ratio and require less heat to reach the ignition point. The County has areas with an abundance of flashy fuels ( i.e., grassland) in the foothill areas of the eastern and western portion of the County. The Project site is located in an area that is predominately agricultural and urban, which is not considered at a significant risk o f wildlife. Therefore, impacts from project implementation would be considered less than significant relative to this topic.

Response WF-3): The Revised Project includes development of infrastructure (water, sewer, and storm drainage). The proposed infras tructure improvements would allow for decreased fire risk relative to existing conditions. The proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Therefore, impacts from project implementation would be considered less than significant relative to this topic.

Response d): The Revised Project site will be connecting to an existing network of City streets. The proposed circulation improvements would allow for greater emergency access relative to existing conditions. The proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Landslides include rockfalls, deep slope failure, and shallow slope failure. Factors such as the geological conditions, drainage, slope, vegetation, and others directly affect the potential for landslides. One of the most common causes of landslides is construction activity that is associated with road building (i.e., cut and fill). The Revised Project site is relatively flat; therefore, the potential for a landslide in the Project site is essentially non-existent.

Therefore, impacts from proposed Revised Project implementation would be considered less than significant relative to this topic.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
136

REFERENCES
Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.

Barbour and Major 1988. Terrestrial Vegetation of California.

Bay Area Air Quality Management. 2017. Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA Guidelines.

May 2017. Available: https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning -and- research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-
pdf.pdf?la=en&rev=4cfd0d5df7094cd4bc4099b087797799
C Donald Ahrens. 2006. Meteorology Today: An Introduction to Weather, Climate, & the Environment.

California Air Resources Board. Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Veh icles. October 2000. Available at:
<https://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/documents/rrpFinal.pdf>.

California Air Resources Board. 2016. ARB Databases: Aerometric Data Analysis and Management System (ADAM). Available at: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/html/databases.htm>.

California Air Resources Board. 2021. EMFAC 2021 Emissions Inventory. Available:
https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissions-
inventory/c5a21aa85c0d98bad4d0f52e9a8ab3dbc1155c88
California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection Conservation Program Support. 2016. San Joaquin County Williamson Act FY 2015/2016. The Williamson Act. Available at: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/wa/Pages/stats_reports.aspx California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resources Protection. 2018. F armland Mapping and Monitoring Program. San Joaquin County Important Farmland 2016. Available:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/SanJoaquin.aspx California Department of Conversation. 2012. Author: Smith, J.D. and Clinkenbeard J.P. Special Report 199. Update of Mineral Land Classification for Portland Cement Concrete-Grade Aggregate in the Stockton-Lodi Production-Consumption Region, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California. Available:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/mlc/ California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2007. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area (SRA ). Adopted by CAL FIRE on October 2, 2007. Available at:
http://frap.fire.ca.gov/webdata/maps/san_joaquin/fhszs_map.39.pdf California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2007. Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. Adopted by CAL FIRE on November 7, 2007. Available:
http://frap.fire.ca.gov/webdata/maps/san_joaquin/fhszl06_1_map.39.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). EnviroStor database. Accessed on April 5, 2022. Available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ California Energy Commission. 2005. Global Climate Change: In Support of the 2005 Integrated Energy Policy Report. (CEC -600-2005-007.) Available at:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-100-2005-007/CEC-100-2005-007- CMF.PDF.

EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
137
California Energy Commission. 2006. Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 to 2004. (CEC -600-2006-013-SF.) Available at:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-600-2006-013/CEC-600-2006-013-SF.PDF.

City of Stockton. 2004. Stockton Citywide Design Guidelines. Available:
http://www.stocktonca.gov/files/CityWideDesignGuidelines.pdf City of Stockton. 2004. Recirculated Environmental Impact Report for Canner Park Development.

May 4, 2004.

City of Stockton. 2008. 2035 Wastewater Master Plan. October 2008. Available:
http://www.stocktonca.gov/files/COS_MUD_wastewater_master_plan.pdf California Energy Commission. 2016. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory – 2016 Edition.

Available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm City of Stockton. June 2018. Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan. Available:
http://www.stocktonca.gov/files/EnvisionStockton2040GP_Draft.pdf City of Stockton. 2021. City of Stockton Municipal Code. Current through 2021 -11-16. Available:
https://library.qcode.us/lib/stockton_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_16-division_5- chapter_16_130?view=all
City of Stockton. 2021. City of Stockton Water Master Plan Update. January 2021. Available:
http://www.stocktonca.gov/files/COS_MUD__Water_Master_Plan_Update_2021.pdf City of Stockton. 2022. City of Stockton Wastewater Master Plan Update. September 2022. Available:
http://www.stocktongov.com/files/COS_MUD__Wastewater_Master_Plan_Update_2022.pdf Fehr & Peers. 2022. VMT Impact Assessment for the Canner Park Revised Development Plan. March 31, 2021.

Hickman, James C. 1993. Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers.” Available:
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf Sawyer, John and Todd Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A Manual of California Vegetation.

Saxelby, Luke. 2022. Environmental Noise Assessment Cannery Park Project. March 25, 2022.

Skinner, Mark W. and Bruce M. Pavlik, Eds. 2001. California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California.

San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). 2017. Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL).

March 1, 2017. Available: http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI- SPAL.PDF
U.S. Census Bureau. 2020. City of Stockton Census Bureau Estimates. Available:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/stocktoncitycalifornia/PST040221#PST04022 1 EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
138
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Climate Change Indicators in the United States: Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Updated May 2014. Available at:
www.epa.gov/climatechange/indicators
EXHIBIT 1
EIR ADDENDUM – CANNERY PARK EIR

City of Stockton October 2023
139
Appendix A: Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modeling
Outputs

EXHIBIT 1
2021 Cannery Park Project
San Joaquin County, Annual

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 4.80 1000sqft 0.59 4,800.00 0
General Office Building 5.40 1000sqft 0.63 5,400.00 0
General Office Building 5.40 1000sqft 0.64 5,400.00 0
Medical Office Building 4.20 1000sqft 0.80 4,200.00 0
Medical Office Building 5.60 1000sqft 0.70 5,600.00 0
Parking Lot 23.65 1000sqft 2.92 23,653.08 0
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 2.30 1000sqft 0.99 2,300.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 4.50 1000sqft 1.68 4,500.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3.00 1000sqft 0.94 3,000.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 7.20 1000sqft 0.90 7,200.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 6.80 1000sqft 0.82 6,800.00 0 Hotel 111.00 Room 2.59 161,172.00 0
Quality Restaurant 6.00 1000sqft 1.08 6,000.00 0
Condo/Townhouse 296.00 Dwelling Unit 12.34 296,000.00 939 Single Family Housing 321.00 Dwelling Unit 67.70 577,800.00 1018 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 4.00 1000sqft 1.44 4,000.00 0 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 5.60 1000sqft 1.61 5,600.00 0 Regional Shopping Center 1.50 1000sqft 1.51 1,500.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 51

1.0 Project Characteristics
2030Operational Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 1 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Actual Acreage;
Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on project size and details.

Off-road Equipment -
Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Trips consistent with Traffic Impact Assessment (Fehr & Peers). Institute of Transportation Engineers 2017.

Energy Use -
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Construction mitigation: Water Exposed Area 2x daily; Clean Paved Road (9% fugitive dust PM reduction); Unpaved road mitigation: Limit on-site construction vehicle speeds to 5 mph; Soil Stabilizer for unpaved (10% reduction) Fleet Mix -

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 5 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 23,650.00 23,653.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.11 0.59
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 0.63
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 0.64
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.10 0.80
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.13 0.70
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.54 2.92
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.05 0.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 2 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.07 0.94
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.10 1.68
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.16 0.82
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.90
tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.70 2.59
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.14 1.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 18.50 12.34
tblLandUse LotAcreage 104.22 67.70
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.09 1.44
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.13 1.61
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.03 1.51
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 3 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1466 1.5187 1.0031 2.0400e-
003

0.9240 0.0705 0.9945 0.3761 0.0648 0.4409 0.0000 179.1788 179.1788 0.0564 1.6000e- 004
180.6367
2023 0.4102 3.5280 3.6355 9.2000e-
003

0.9154 0.1405 1.0559 0.3149 0.1303 0.4452 0.0000 824.1373 824.1373 0.1556 0.0259 835.7492 2024 0.3585 2.4769 3.4844 0.0100 0.5424 0.0864 0.6288 0.1463 0.0813 0.2277 0.0000 910.7357 910.7357 0.0828 0.0495 927.5590 2025 0.3323 2.3275 3.3727 9.8100e-
003

0.5403 0.0748 0.6151 0.1458 0.0704 0.2162 0.0000 891.1362 891.1362 0.0810 0.0479 907.4378 2026 0.3229 2.3155 3.3096 9.6500e-
003

0.5403 0.0747 0.6150 0.1458 0.0703 0.2161 0.0000 875.8806 875.8806 0.0802 0.0466 891.7716 2027 0.3144 2.3041 3.2479 9.4900e-
003

0.5403 0.0746 0.6149 0.1458 0.0702 0.2160 0.0000 861.3559 861.3559 0.0795 0.0453 876.8514 2028 0.3055 2.2864 3.1848 9.3100e-
003

0.5382 0.0742 0.6124 0.1452 0.0698 0.2150 0.0000 844.8453 844.8453 0.0785 0.0440 859.9252 2029 3.5731 1.4864 2.2404 5.4400e-
003

0.2535 0.0562 0.3097 0.0683 0.0525 0.1208 0.0000 489.6587 489.6587 0.0700 0.0190 497.0659 2030 6.4169 0.0338 0.1116 2.8000e-
004

0.0247 8.1000e-
004

0.0255 6.5600e-
003

8.1000e-
004

7.3600e-
003

0.0000 24.9414 24.9414 6.8000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

25.0700
Maximum 6.4169 3.5280 3.6355 0.0100 0.9240 0.1405 1.0559 0.3761 0.1303 0.4452 0.0000 910.7357 910.7357 0.1556 0.0495 927.5590 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 4 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1466 1.5187 1.0031 2.0400e-
003

0.4189 0.0705 0.4893 0.1701 0.0648 0.2349 0.0000 179.1785 179.1785 0.0564 1.6000e- 004
180.6365
2023 0.4102 3.5280 3.6355 9.2000e-
003

0.5464 0.1405 0.6870 0.1785 0.1303 0.3088 0.0000 824.1367 824.1367 0.1556 0.0259 835.7486 2024 0.3585 2.4769 3.4844 0.0100 0.5015 0.0864 0.5879 0.1363 0.0813 0.2176 0.0000 910.7354 910.7354 0.0828 0.0495 927.5586 2025 0.3323 2.3275 3.3727 9.8100e-
003

0.4996 0.0748 0.5744 0.1358 0.0704 0.2062 0.0000 891.1358 891.1358 0.0810 0.0479 907.4375 2026 0.3229 2.3155 3.3096 9.6500e-
003

0.4996 0.0747 0.5743 0.1358 0.0703 0.2061 0.0000 875.8802 875.8802 0.0802 0.0466 891.7713 2027 0.3144 2.3041 3.2479 9.4900e-
003

0.4996 0.0746 0.5741 0.1358 0.0702 0.2060 0.0000 861.3555 861.3555 0.0795 0.0453 876.8511 2028 0.3055 2.2864 3.1847 9.3100e-
003

0.4977 0.0742 0.5718 0.1353 0.0698 0.2050 0.0000 844.8450 844.8450 0.0785 0.0440 859.9249 2029 3.5731 1.4864 2.2404 5.4400e-
003

0.2344 0.0562 0.2906 0.0636 0.0525 0.1161 0.0000 489.6585 489.6585 0.0700 0.0190 497.0656 2030 6.4169 0.0338 0.1116 2.8000e-
004

0.0227 8.1000e-
004

0.0236 6.0900e-
003

8.1000e-
004

6.8900e-
003

0.0000 24.9414 24.9414 6.8000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

25.0700
Maximum 6.4169 3.5280 3.6355 0.0100 0.5464 0.1405 0.6870 0.1785 0.1303 0.3088 0.0000 910.7354 910.7354 0.1556 0.0495 927.5586 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.80 0.00 20.08 26.60 0.00 18.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1971 1.1971
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 5 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
2 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.2709 1.2709
3 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.2465 1.2465
4 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.8996 0.8996
5 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.7480 0.7480
6 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 0.7252 0.7252
7 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 0.7111 0.7111
8 6-1-2024 8-31-2024 0.7070 0.7070
9 9-1-2024 11-30-2024 0.7074 0.7074
10 12-1-2024 2-28-2025 0.6767 0.6767
11 3-1-2025 5-31-2025 0.6694 0.6694
12 6-1-2025 8-31-2025 0.6654 0.6654
13 9-1-2025 11-30-2025 0.6661 0.6661
14 12-1-2025 2-28-2026 0.6589 0.6589
15 3-1-2026 5-31-2026 0.6638 0.6638
16 6-1-2026 8-31-2026 0.6599 0.6599
17 9-1-2026 11-30-2026 0.6605 0.6605
18 12-1-2026 2-28-2027 0.6536 0.6536
19 3-1-2027 5-31-2027 0.6587 0.6587
20 6-1-2027 8-31-2027 0.6548 0.6548
21 9-1-2027 11-30-2027 0.6553 0.6553
22 12-1-2027 2-29-2028 0.6562 0.6562
23 3-1-2028 5-31-2028 0.6544 0.6544
24 6-1-2028 8-31-2028 0.6506 0.6506
25 9-1-2028 11-30-2028 0.6510 0.6510
26 12-1-2028 2-28-2029 0.6449 0.6449
27 3-1-2029 5-31-2029 0.6504 0.6504
28 6-1-2029 8-31-2029 0.3374 0.3374
29 9-1-2029 11-30-2029 1.7083 1.7083
30 12-1-2029 2-28-2030 5.7639 5.7639
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 6 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
31 3-1-2030 5-31-2030 2.6240 2.6240
Highest 5.7639 5.7639

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 7.0764 0.5252 19.4828 0.0501 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 323.5795 274.7760 598.3556 1.5249 4.9000e- 003
637.9391
Energy 0.1145 1.0022 0.5902 6.2500e-
003

0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0000 1,717.172
3 1,717.172
3 0.1162 0.0322 1,729.680
6 Mobile 6.4821 7.8255 50.7812 0.1023 12.0036 0.0799 12.0835 3.2077 0.0748 3.2825 0.0000 9,459.143 2 9,459.143
2 0.6507 0.5744 9,646.569
9 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 201.7345 0.0000 201.7345 11.9222 0.0000 499.7886 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.0472 37.7643 55.8114 1.8597 0.0445 115.5682 Total 13.6729 9.3529 70.8541 0.1586 12.0036 2.6197 14.6232 3.2077 2.6145 5.8222 543.3612 11,488.85 58 12,032.21
69 16.0737 0.6560 12,629.54
63 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 7 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 7.0764 0.5252 19.4828 0.0501 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 323.5795 274.7760 598.3556 1.5249 4.9000e- 003
637.9391
Energy 0.1145 1.0022 0.5902 6.2500e-
003

0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0000 1,717.172
3 1,717.172
3 0.1162 0.0322 1,729.680
6 Mobile 6.4821 7.8255 50.7812 0.1023 12.0036 0.0799 12.0835 3.2077 0.0748 3.2825 0.0000 9,459.143 2 9,459.143
2 0.6507 0.5744 9,646.569
9 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 201.7345 0.0000 201.7345 11.9222 0.0000 499.7886 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.0472 37.7643 55.8114 1.8597 0.0445 115.5682 Total 13.6729 9.3529 70.8541 0.1586 12.0036 2.6197 14.6232 3.2077 2.6145 5.8222 543.3612 11,488.85 58 12,032.21
69 16.0737 0.6560 12,629.54
63 Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 8 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.0 Construction Detail

2.3 Vegetation
CO2e
Category MT
Vegetation Land
Change
-619.2560
Total -619.2560
Vegetation
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/1/2022 11/23/2022 5 60 2 Grading Grading 11/24/2022 6/28/2023 5 155
3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/29/2023 6/6/2029 5 1550 4 Paving Paving 6/7/2029 11/7/2029 5 110
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/8/2029 4/10/2030 5 110 Residential Indoor: 1,769,445; Residential Outdoor: 589,815; Non-Residential Indoor: 341,208; Non-Residential Outdoor: 113,736; Striped Parking Area: 1,419 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465
Acres of Paving: 2.92
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 9 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 431.00 107.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 86.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 10 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.5897 0.0000 0.5897 0.3031 0.0000 0.3031 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.0484 0.0484 0.0445 0.0445 0.0000 100.3182 100.3182 0.0324 0.0000 101.1293 Total 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.5897 0.0484 0.6381 0.3031 0.0445 0.3476 0.0000 100.3182 100.3182 0.0324 0.0000 101.1293 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 11 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3200e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Total 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3200e-
003

1.1400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.2654 0.0000 0.2654 0.1364 0.0000 0.1364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.0484 0.0484 0.0445 0.0445 0.0000 100.3181 100.3181 0.0324 0.0000 101.1292 Total 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e-
003

0.2654 0.0484 0.3138 0.1364 0.0445 0.1809 0.0000 100.3181 100.3181 0.0324 0.0000 101.1292 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 12 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

3.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9900e-
003

1.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Total 1.7100e-
003

1.1900e-
003

0.0134 4.0000e-
005

3.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.9900e-
003

1.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

0.0000 3.4926 3.4926 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

3.5270
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.3279 0.0000 0.3279 0.0713 0.0000 0.0713 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.0221 0.0221 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 73.6217 73.6217 0.0238 0.0000 74.2170 Total 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.3279 0.0221 0.3499 0.0713 0.0203 0.0916 0.0000 73.6217 73.6217 0.0238 0.0000 74.2170 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 13 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.5000e-
004

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.1600e-
003

5.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.8000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Total 8.5000e-
004

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.1600e-
003

5.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.8000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1475 0.0000 0.1475 0.0321 0.0000 0.0321 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.0221 0.0221 0.0203 0.0203 0.0000 73.6216 73.6216 0.0238 0.0000 74.2169 Total 0.0489 0.5244 0.3921 8.4000e-
004

0.1475 0.0221 0.1696 0.0321 0.0203 0.0524 0.0000 73.6216 73.6216 0.0238 0.0000 74.2169 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 14 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.5000e-
004

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Total 8.5000e-
004

5.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7463 1.7463 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.7635
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.6320 0.0000 0.6320 0.2385 0.0000 0.2385 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.0912 0.0912 0.0839 0.0839 0.0000 349.0253 349.0253 0.1129 0.0000 351.8474 Total 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.6320 0.0912 0.7232 0.2385 0.0839 0.3224 0.0000 349.0253 349.0253 0.1129 0.0000 351.8474 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 15 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7200e-
003

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

0.0102 5.0000e-
005

0.0103 2.7100e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.7600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Total 3.7200e-
003

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

0.0102 5.0000e-
005

0.0103 2.7100e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.7600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.2844 0.0000 0.2844 0.1073 0.0000 0.1073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.0912 0.0912 0.0839 0.0839 0.0000 349.0249 349.0249 0.1129 0.0000 351.8470 Total 0.2126 2.2090 1.7953 3.9700e-
003

0.2844 0.0912 0.3756 0.1073 0.0839 0.1912 0.0000 349.0249 349.0249 0.1129 0.0000 351.8470 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 16 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7200e-
003

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
003

5.0000e-
005

9.4500e-
003

2.5200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.5600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Total 3.7200e-
003

2.4600e-
003

0.0291 9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
003

5.0000e-
005

9.4500e-
003

2.5200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.5600e-
003

0.0000 8.0116 8.0116 2.4000e-
004

2.3000e-
004

8.0863
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1038 0.9494 1.0721 1.7800e-
003

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9911 152.9911 0.0364 0.0000 153.9010 Total 0.1038 0.9494 1.0721 1.7800e-
003

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9911 152.9911 0.0364 0.0000 153.9010 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 17 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.4500e-
003

0.3124 0.0920 1.4200e-
003

0.0467 2.0000e-
003

0.0487 0.0135 1.9100e-
003

0.0154 0.0000 136.0633 136.0633 6.7000e-
004

0.0206 142.2099
Worker 0.0826 0.0547 0.6471 1.9400e-
003

0.2266 1.1200e-
003

0.2277 0.0602 1.0300e-
003

0.0613 0.0000 178.0460 178.0460 5.4200e-
003

5.1100e-
003
179.7046
Total 0.0901 0.3671 0.7390 3.3600e-
003

0.2733 3.1200e-
003

0.2764 0.0737 2.9400e-
003

0.0767 0.0000 314.1092 314.1092 6.0900e-
003

0.0257 321.9146
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1038 0.9494 1.0721 1.7800e-
003

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9910 152.9910 0.0364 0.0000 153.9008 Total 0.1038 0.9494 1.0721 1.7800e-
003

0.0462 0.0462 0.0435 0.0435 0.0000 152.9910 152.9910 0.0364 0.0000 153.9008 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 18 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.4500e-
003

0.3124 0.0920 1.4200e-
003

0.0437 2.0000e-
003

0.0457 0.0128 1.9100e-
003

0.0147 0.0000 136.0633 136.0633 6.7000e-
004

0.0206 142.2099
Worker 0.0826 0.0547 0.6471 1.9400e-
003

0.2089 1.1200e-
003

0.2101 0.0559 1.0300e-
003

0.0569 0.0000 178.0460 178.0460 5.4200e-
003

5.1100e-
003
179.7046
Total 0.0901 0.3671 0.7390 3.3600e-
003

0.2527 3.1200e-
003

0.2558 0.0687 2.9400e-
003

0.0716 0.0000 314.1092 314.1092 6.0900e-
003

0.0257 321.9146
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 19 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0144 0.6205 0.1790 2.7700e-
003

0.0926 4.0000e-
003

0.0966 0.0268 3.8300e-
003

0.0306 0.0000 265.8695 265.8695 1.2700e-
003

0.0402 277.8655
Worker 0.1513 0.0953 1.1875 3.7200e-
003

0.4497 2.0900e-
003

0.4518 0.1196 1.9200e-
003

0.1215 0.0000 341.1439 341.1439 9.6500e-
003

9.3600e-
003
344.1756
Total 0.1657 0.7158 1.3665 6.4900e-
003

0.5424 6.0900e-
003

0.5485 0.1463 5.7500e-
003

0.1521 0.0000 607.0134 607.0134 0.0109 0.0495 622.0411
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 20 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0144 0.6205 0.1790 2.7700e-
003

0.0868 4.0000e-
003

0.0908 0.0253 3.8300e-
003

0.0292 0.0000 265.8695 265.8695 1.2700e-
003

0.0402 277.8655
Worker 0.1513 0.0953 1.1875 3.7200e-
003

0.4147 2.0900e-
003

0.4168 0.1110 1.9200e-
003

0.1129 0.0000 341.1439 341.1439 9.6500e-
003

9.3600e-
003
344.1756
Total 0.1657 0.7158 1.3665 6.4900e-
003

0.5015 6.0900e-
003

0.5076 0.1363 5.7500e-
003

0.1421 0.0000 607.0134 607.0134 0.0109 0.0495 622.0411
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 21 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0141 0.6160 0.1752 2.7100e-
003

0.0923 3.9800e-
003

0.0963 0.0267 3.8100e-
003

0.0305 0.0000 260.1449 260.1449 1.2200e-
003

0.0392 271.8660
Worker 0.1398 0.0842 1.0984 3.5800e-
003

0.4480 1.9800e-
003

0.4500 0.1191 1.8200e-
003

0.1209 0.0000 328.3364 328.3364 8.6600e-
003

8.6800e-
003
331.1383
Total 0.1539 0.7002 1.2736 6.2900e-
003

0.5403 5.9600e-
003

0.5463 0.1458 5.6300e-
003

0.1514 0.0000 588.4813 588.4813 9.8800e-
003

0.0479 603.0043
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 22 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0141 0.6160 0.1752 2.7100e-
003

0.0864 3.9800e-
003

0.0904 0.0252 3.8100e-
003

0.0290 0.0000 260.1449 260.1449 1.2200e-
003

0.0392 271.8660
Worker 0.1398 0.0842 1.0984 3.5800e-
003

0.4131 1.9800e-
003

0.4151 0.1106 1.8200e-
003

0.1124 0.0000 328.3364 328.3364 8.6600e-
003

8.6800e-
003
331.1383
Total 0.1539 0.7002 1.2736 6.2900e-
003

0.4996 5.9600e-
003

0.5055 0.1358 5.6300e-
003

0.1414 0.0000 588.4813 588.4813 9.8800e-
003

0.0479 603.0043
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 23 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0138 0.6126 0.1727 2.6600e-
003

0.0923 3.9700e-
003

0.0962 0.0267 3.7900e-
003

0.0305 0.0000 255.3441 255.3441 1.1700e-
003

0.0385 266.8324
Worker 0.1306 0.0757 1.0378 3.4700e-
003

0.4480 1.8900e-
003

0.4499 0.1191 1.7400e-
003

0.1209 0.0000 317.8816 317.8816 7.8700e-
003

8.1500e-
003
320.5058
Total 0.1444 0.6882 1.2106 6.1300e-
003

0.5403 5.8600e-
003

0.5462 0.1458 5.5300e-
003

0.1513 0.0000 573.2257 573.2257 9.0400e-
003

0.0466 587.3381
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 24 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0138 0.6126 0.1727 2.6600e-
003

0.0864 3.9700e-
003

0.0904 0.0252 3.7900e-
003

0.0290 0.0000 255.3441 255.3441 1.1700e-
003

0.0385 266.8324
Worker 0.1306 0.0757 1.0378 3.4700e-
003

0.4131 1.8900e-
003

0.4150 0.1106 1.7400e-
003

0.1123 0.0000 317.8816 317.8816 7.8700e-
003

8.1500e-
003
320.5058
Total 0.1444 0.6882 1.2106 6.1300e-
003

0.4996 5.8600e-
003

0.5054 0.1358 5.5300e-
003

0.1413 0.0000 573.2257 573.2257 9.0400e-
003

0.0466 587.3381
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 25 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0136 0.6082 0.1706 2.6100e-
003

0.0923 3.9400e-
003

0.0962 0.0267 3.7700e-
003

0.0304 0.0000 250.1706 250.1706 1.1300e-
003

0.0376 261.4120
Worker 0.1223 0.0686 0.9783 3.3600e-
003

0.4480 1.7900e-
003

0.4498 0.1191 1.6400e-
003

0.1208 0.0000 308.5304 308.5304 7.1700e-
003

7.7100e-
003
311.0059
Total 0.1359 0.6768 1.1488 5.9700e-
003

0.5403 5.7300e-
003

0.5460 0.1458 5.4100e-
003

0.1512 0.0000 558.7010 558.7010 8.3000e-
003

0.0453 572.4179
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e-
003

0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 26 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0136 0.6082 0.1706 2.6100e-
003

0.0864 3.9400e-
003

0.0904 0.0252 3.7700e-
003

0.0290 0.0000 250.1706 250.1706 1.1300e-
003

0.0376 261.4120
Worker 0.1223 0.0686 0.9783 3.3600e-
003

0.4131 1.7900e-
003

0.4149 0.1106 1.6400e-
003

0.1122 0.0000 308.5304 308.5304 7.1700e-
003

7.7100e-
003
311.0059
Total 0.1359 0.6768 1.1488 5.9700e-
003

0.4996 5.7300e-
003

0.5053 0.1358 5.4100e-
003

0.1412 0.0000 558.7010 558.7010 8.3000e-
003

0.0453 572.4179
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e-
003

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e-
003

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 27 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0134 0.6028 0.1682 2.5500e-
003

0.0919 3.9000e-
003

0.0958 0.0266 3.7300e-
003

0.0303 0.0000 244.3208 244.3208 1.1000e-
003

0.0367 255.2849
Worker 0.1144 0.0625 0.9255 3.2600e-
003

0.4463 1.6700e-
003

0.4480 0.1187 1.5300e-
003

0.1202 0.0000 299.0292 299.0292 6.5500e-
003

7.3200e-
003
301.3732
Total 0.1278 0.6653 1.0937 5.8100e-
003

0.5382 5.5700e-
003

0.5438 0.1452 5.2600e-
003

0.1505 0.0000 543.3500 543.3500 7.6500e-
003

0.0440 556.6581
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e-
003

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e-
003

0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 28 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0134 0.6028 0.1682 2.5500e-
003

0.0861 3.9000e-
003

0.0900 0.0251 3.7300e-
003

0.0289 0.0000 244.3208 244.3208 1.1000e-
003

0.0367 255.2849
Worker 0.1144 0.0625 0.9255 3.2600e-
003

0.4116 1.6700e-
003

0.4132 0.1101 1.5300e-
003

0.1117 0.0000 299.0292 299.0292 6.5500e-
003

7.3200e-
003
301.3732
Total 0.1278 0.6653 1.0937 5.8100e-
003

0.4977 5.5700e-
003

0.5032 0.1353 5.2600e-
003

0.1405 0.0000 543.3500 543.3500 7.6500e-
003

0.0440 556.6581
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0773 0.7045 0.9088 1.5200e-
003

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0345 131.0345 0.0308 0.0000 131.8046 Total 0.0773 0.7045 0.9088 1.5200e-
003

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0345 131.0345 0.0308 0.0000 131.8046 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 29 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.7300e-
003

0.2604 0.0725 1.0900e-
003

0.0400 1.6800e-
003

0.0416 0.0116 1.6100e-
003

0.0132 0.0000 104.1282 104.1282 4.6000e-
004

0.0156 108.7952
Worker 0.0468 0.0251 0.3842 1.3800e-
003

0.1940 6.8000e-
004

0.1947 0.0516 6.2000e-
004

0.0522 0.0000 126.7408 126.7408 2.6200e-
003

3.0500e-
003
127.7156
Total 0.0525 0.2856 0.4567 2.4700e-
003

0.2339 2.3600e-
003

0.2363 0.0631 2.2300e-
003

0.0654 0.0000 230.8690 230.8690 3.0800e-
003

0.0187 236.5108
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0773 0.7045 0.9088 1.5200e-
003

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0343 131.0343 0.0308 0.0000 131.8044 Total 0.0773 0.7045 0.9088 1.5200e-
003

0.0298 0.0298 0.0280 0.0280 0.0000 131.0343 131.0343 0.0308 0.0000 131.8044 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 30 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.7300e-
003

0.2604 0.0725 1.0900e-
003

0.0374 1.6800e-
003

0.0391 0.0109 1.6100e-
003

0.0125 0.0000 104.1282 104.1282 4.6000e-
004

0.0156 108.7952
Worker 0.0468 0.0251 0.3842 1.3800e-
003

0.1789 6.8000e-
004

0.1796 0.0479 6.2000e-
004

0.0485 0.0000 126.7408 126.7408 2.6200e-
003

3.0500e-
003
127.7156
Total 0.0525 0.2856 0.4567 2.4700e-
003

0.2163 2.3600e-
003

0.2187 0.0588 2.2300e-
003

0.0610 0.0000 230.8690 230.8690 3.0800e-
003

0.0187 236.5108
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1059 110.1059 0.0356 0.0000 110.9962 Paving 3.8300e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0542 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1059 110.1059 0.0356 0.0000 110.9962 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 31 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.5700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Total 1.5800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.5700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.5900e-
003

1.7500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.7700e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1058 110.1058 0.0356 0.0000 110.9960 Paving 3.8300e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0542 0.4720 0.8018 1.2500e-
003

0.0230 0.0230 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1058 110.1058 0.0356 0.0000 110.9960 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 32 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.0800e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.6400e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Total 1.5800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

6.0600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.0800e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.6400e-
003

0.0000 4.2938 4.2938 9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

4.3269
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 3.3812 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.2500e-
003

0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Total 3.3845 0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 33 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

0.0258 9.0000e-
005

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

0.0131 3.4600e-
003

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
003

0.0000 8.5044 8.5044 1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

8.5698
Total 3.1400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

0.0258 9.0000e-
005

0.0130 5.0000e-
005

0.0131 3.4600e-
003

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
003

0.0000 8.5044 8.5044 1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

8.5698
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 3.3812 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.2500e-
003

0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Total 3.3845 0.0218 0.0344 6.0000e-
005

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8512 4.8512 2.6000e-
004

0.0000 4.8578
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 34 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

0.0258 9.0000e-
005

0.0120 5.0000e-
005

0.0121 3.2100e-
003

4.0000e-
005

3.2500e-
003

0.0000 8.5044 8.5044 1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

8.5698
Total 3.1400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

0.0258 9.0000e-
005

0.0120 5.0000e-
005

0.0121 3.2100e-
003

4.0000e-
005

3.2500e-
003

0.0000 8.5044 8.5044 1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

8.5698
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2030
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 6.4066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7100e-
003

0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Total 6.4113 0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 35 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2030
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e-
003

2.9700e-
003

0.0469 1.7000e-
004

0.0247 8.0000e-
005

0.0247 6.5600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

6.6300e-
003

0.0000 15.7497 15.7497 3.1000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

15.8690
Total 5.6000e-
003

2.9700e-
003

0.0469 1.7000e-
004

0.0247 8.0000e-
005

0.0247 6.5600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

6.6300e-
003

0.0000 15.7497 15.7497 3.1000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

15.8690
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 6.4066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7100e-
003

0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Total 6.4113 0.0308 0.0647 1.1000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

0.0000 9.1917 9.1917 3.7000e-
004

0.0000 9.2010
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 36 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2030
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e-
003

2.9700e-
003

0.0469 1.7000e-
004

0.0227 8.0000e-
005

0.0228 6.0900e-
003

7.0000e-
005

6.1600e-
003

0.0000 15.7497 15.7497 3.1000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

15.8690
Total 5.6000e-
003

2.9700e-
003

0.0469 1.7000e-
004

0.0227 8.0000e-
005

0.0228 6.0900e-
003

7.0000e-
005

6.1600e-
003

0.0000 15.7497 15.7497 3.1000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

15.8690
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 37 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 6.4821 7.8255 50.7812 0.1023 12.0036 0.0799 12.0835 3.2077 0.0748 3.2825 0.0000 9,459.143 2 9,459.143
2 0.6507 0.5744 9,646.569
9 Unmitigated 6.4821 7.8255 50.7812 0.1023 12.0036 0.0799 12.0835 3.2077 0.0748 3.2825 0.0000 9,459.143 2 9,459.143
2 0.6507 0.5744 9,646.569
9 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Condo/Townhouse 2,166.72 2,409.44 1858.88 6,251,800 6,251,800 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 2,496.80 2,496.80 2496.80 1,339,294 1,339,294 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 3,495.52 3,495.52 3495.52 1,875,012 1,875,012 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1,083.19 1,417.08 1086.93 1,057,113 1,057,113 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 2,119.28 2,772.54 2126.61 2,068,265 2,068,265 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1,412.85 1,848.36 1417.74 1,378,844 1,378,844 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,390.84 4,436.06 3402.58 3,309,224 3,309,224 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3,202.46 4,189.62 3213.54 3,125,379 3,125,379 General Office Building 46.75 10.61 3.36 84,573 84,573
General Office Building 52.60 11.93 3.78 95,144 95,144
General Office Building 52.60 11.93 3.78 95,144 95,144
Hotel 927.96 909.09 660.45 1,685,331 1,685,331
Medical Office Building 146.16 35.99 5.96 216,069 216,069 Medical Office Building 194.88 47.99 7.95 288,092 288,092 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Restaurant 503.04 540.24 431.82 590,925 590,925 Regional Shopping Center 56.63 69.18 31.65 96,170 96,170 Single Family Housing 3,030.24 3,062.34 2744.55 8,676,101 8,676,101 Total 24,378.50 27,764.73 22,991.91 32,232,478 32,232,478 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 38 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Condo/Townhouse 10.80 7.30 7.50 45.60 19.00 35.40 86 11 3 Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.80 80.20 19.00 14 21 65
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 29 21 50
General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Medical Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 29.60 51.40 19.00 60 30 10 Medical Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 29.60 51.40 19.00 60 30 10 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Quality Restaurant 9.50 7.30 7.30 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 9.50 7.30 7.30 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 45.60 19.00 35.40 86 11 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Condo/Townhouse 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Convenience Market with Gas
Pumps

0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 General Office Building 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Hotel 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Medical Office Building 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Parking Lot 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 39 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Quality Restaurant 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Regional Shopping Center 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685 Single Family Housing 0.560100 0.053949 0.173371 0.131047 0.021297 0.005494 0.012620 0.016451 0.000441 0.000312 0.021225 0.001008 0.002685

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 583.9246 583.9246 0.0945 0.0115 589.6985 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 583.9246 583.9246 0.0945 0.0115 589.6985 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1145 1.0022 0.5902 6.2500e-
003

0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0000 1,133.247
7 1,133.247
7 0.0217 0.0208 1,139.982
0 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1145 1.0022 0.5902 6.2500e-
003

0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0000 1,133.247
7 1,133.247
7 0.0217 0.0208 1,139.982
0 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 40 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

5.58611e
+006

0.0301 0.2574 0.1095 1.6400e-
003

0.0208 0.0208 0.0208 0.0208 0.0000 298.0964 298.0964 5.7100e- 003

5.4700e-
003
299.8678
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
46320 2.5000e-
004

2.2700e-
003

1.9100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.4718 2.4718 5.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.4865
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
64848 3.5000e-
004

3.1800e-
003

2.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

0.0000 3.4605 3.4605 7.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

3.4811
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
250723 1.3500e-
003

0.0123 0.0103 7.0000e-
005

9.3000e-
004

9.3000e-
004

9.3000e-
004

9.3000e-
004

0.0000 13.3795 13.3795 2.6000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

13.4590
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
327030 1.7600e-
003

0.0160 0.0135 1.0000e-
004

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000 17.4516 17.4516 3.3000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

17.5553
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
490545 2.6500e-
003

0.0241 0.0202 1.4000e-
004

1.8300e-
003

1.8300e-
003

1.8300e-
003

1.8300e-
003

0.0000 26.1774 26.1774 5.0000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

26.3329
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
741268 4.0000e-
003

0.0363 0.0305 2.2000e-
004

2.7600e-
003

2.7600e-
003

2.7600e-
003

2.7600e-
003

0.0000 39.5569 39.5569 7.6000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

39.7920
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
784872 4.2300e-
003

0.0385 0.0323 2.3000e-
004

2.9200e-
003

2.9200e-
003

2.9200e-
003

2.9200e-
003

0.0000 41.8838 41.8838 8.0000e-
004

7.7000e-
004

42.1327
General Office
Building
78240 4.2000e-
004

3.8400e-
003

3.2200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

0.0000 4.1752 4.1752 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.2000
General Office
Building
88020 9.5000e-
004

8.6300e-
003

7.2500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000 9.3942 9.3942 1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.4500
Hotel 4.26461e
+006

0.0230 0.2091 0.1756 1.2500e-
003

0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 227.5759 227.5759 4.3600e- 003

4.1700e-
003
228.9283
Medical Office
Building
68460 3.7000e-
004

3.3600e-
003

2.8200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.6533 3.6533 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.6750
Medical Office
Building
91280 4.9000e-
004

4.4700e-
003

3.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 4.8711 4.8711 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

4.9000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality
Restaurant
654060 3.5300e-
003

0.0321 0.0269 1.9000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

2.4400e-
003

2.4400e-
003

2.4400e-
003

0.0000 34.9031 34.9031 6.7000e-
004

6.4000e-
004

35.1105
Regional
Shopping Center
17370 9.0000e-
005

8.5000e-
004

7.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.9269 0.9269 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9324
Single Family
Housing

7.59448e
+006

0.0410 0.3499 0.1489 2.2300e-
003

0.0283 0.0283 0.0283 0.0283 0.0000 405.2703 405.2703 7.7700e- 003

7.4300e-
003
407.6786
Total 0.1145 1.0022 0.5902 6.2300e-
003

0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0000 1,133.247
7 1,133.247
7 0.0217 0.0208 1,139.982
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 41 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 42 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

5.58611e
+006

0.0301 0.2574 0.1095 1.6400e-
003

0.0208 0.0208 0.0208 0.0208 0.0000 298.0964 298.0964 5.7100e- 003

5.4700e-
003
299.8678
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
46320 2.5000e-
004

2.2700e-
003

1.9100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.4718 2.4718 5.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.4865
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
64848 3.5000e-
004

3.1800e-
003

2.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

0.0000 3.4605 3.4605 7.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

3.4811
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
250723 1.3500e-
003

0.0123 0.0103 7.0000e-
005

9.3000e-
004

9.3000e-
004

9.3000e-
004

9.3000e-
004

0.0000 13.3795 13.3795 2.6000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

13.4590
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
327030 1.7600e-
003

0.0160 0.0135 1.0000e-
004

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000 17.4516 17.4516 3.3000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

17.5553
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
490545 2.6500e-
003

0.0241 0.0202 1.4000e-
004

1.8300e-
003

1.8300e-
003

1.8300e-
003

1.8300e-
003

0.0000 26.1774 26.1774 5.0000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

26.3329
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
741268 4.0000e-
003

0.0363 0.0305 2.2000e-
004

2.7600e-
003

2.7600e-
003

2.7600e-
003

2.7600e-
003

0.0000 39.5569 39.5569 7.6000e-
004

7.3000e-
004

39.7920
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
784872 4.2300e-
003

0.0385 0.0323 2.3000e-
004

2.9200e-
003

2.9200e-
003

2.9200e-
003

2.9200e-
003

0.0000 41.8838 41.8838 8.0000e-
004

7.7000e-
004

42.1327
General Office
Building
78240 4.2000e-
004

3.8400e-
003

3.2200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

0.0000 4.1752 4.1752 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.2000
General Office
Building
88020 9.5000e-
004

8.6300e-
003

7.2500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000 9.3942 9.3942 1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.4500
Hotel 4.26461e
+006

0.0230 0.2091 0.1756 1.2500e-
003

0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 227.5759 227.5759 4.3600e- 003

4.1700e-
003
228.9283
Medical Office
Building
68460 3.7000e-
004

3.3600e-
003

2.8200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.6533 3.6533 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

3.6750
Medical Office
Building
91280 4.9000e-
004

4.4700e-
003

3.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 4.8711 4.8711 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

4.9000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Quality
Restaurant
654060 3.5300e-
003

0.0321 0.0269 1.9000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

2.4400e-
003

2.4400e-
003

2.4400e-
003

0.0000 34.9031 34.9031 6.7000e-
004

6.4000e-
004

35.1105
Regional
Shopping Center
17370 9.0000e-
005

8.5000e-
004

7.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.9269 0.9269 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9324
Single Family
Housing

7.59448e
+006

0.0410 0.3499 0.1489 2.2300e-
003

0.0283 0.0283 0.0283 0.0283 0.0000 405.2703 405.2703 7.7700e- 003

7.4300e-
003
407.6786
Total 0.1145 1.0022 0.5902 6.2300e-
003

0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0791 0.0000 1,133.247
7 1,133.247
7 0.0217 0.0208 1,139.982
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 43 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 44 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

1.44337e
+006
133.5460 0.0216 2.6200e-
003
134.8666
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
45480 4.2080 6.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

4.2496
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
63672 5.8912 9.5000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

5.9494
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
138150 12.7822 2.0700e-
003

2.5000e-
004

12.9086
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
208760 19.3153 3.1200e-
003

3.8000e-
004

19.5063
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
221040 20.4515 3.3100e-
003

4.0000e-
004

20.6537
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
70610 6.5331 1.0600e-
003

1.3000e-
004

6.5977
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
92100 8.5214 1.3800e-
003

1.7000e-
004

8.6057
General Office
Building
46368 4.2901 6.9000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

4.3326
General Office
Building
52164 9.6528 1.5600e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.7483
Hotel 1.03472e
+006

95.7366 0.0155 1.8800e-
003

96.6833
Medical Office
Building
40572 3.7539 6.1000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

3.7910
Medical Office
Building
54096 5.0052 8.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

5.0547
Parking Lot 8278.58 0.7660 1.2000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

0.7735
Quality
Restaurant
184200 17.0429 2.7600e-
003

3.3000e-
004

17.2114
Regional
Shopping Center
17055 1.5780 2.6000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

1.5936
Single Family
Housing

2.53827e
+006
234.8505 0.0380 4.6100e-
003
237.1728
Total 583.9246 0.0945 0.0115 589.6985
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 45 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 46 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

1.44337e
+006
133.5460 0.0216 2.6200e-
003
134.8666
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
45480 4.2080 6.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

4.2496
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps
63672 5.8912 9.5000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

5.9494
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
138150 12.7822 2.0700e-
003

2.5000e-
004

12.9086
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
208760 19.3153 3.1200e-
003

3.8000e-
004

19.5063
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
221040 20.4515 3.3100e-
003

4.0000e-
004

20.6537
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
70610 6.5331 1.0600e-
003

1.3000e-
004

6.5977
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
92100 8.5214 1.3800e-
003

1.7000e-
004

8.6057
General Office
Building
46368 4.2901 6.9000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

4.3326
General Office
Building
52164 9.6528 1.5600e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.7483
Hotel 1.03472e
+006

95.7366 0.0155 1.8800e-
003

96.6833
Medical Office
Building
40572 3.7539 6.1000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

3.7910
Medical Office
Building
54096 5.0052 8.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

5.0547
Parking Lot 8278.58 0.7660 1.2000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

0.7735
Quality
Restaurant
184200 17.0429 2.7600e-
003

3.3000e-
004

17.2114
Regional
Shopping Center
17055 1.5780 2.6000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

1.5936
Single Family
Housing

2.53827e
+006
234.8505 0.0380 4.6100e-
003
237.1728
Total 583.9246 0.0945 0.0115 589.6985
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 47 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 7.0764 0.5252 19.4828 0.0501 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 323.5795 274.7760 598.3556 1.5249 4.9000e- 003
637.9391
Unmitigated 7.0764 0.5252 19.4828 0.0501 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 323.5795 274.7760 598.3556 1.5249 4.9000e- 003
637.9391
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 48 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.9788 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 1.6582 0.4725 14.9118 0.0498 2.4352 2.4352 2.4352 2.4352 323.5795 267.2890 590.8685 1.5178 4.9000e- 003
630.2736
Landscaping 0.1368 0.0527 4.5710 2.4000e-
004

0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0000 7.4871 7.4871 7.1400e- 003

0.0000 7.6655
Total 7.0764 0.5251 19.4828 0.0500 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 323.5795 274.7760 598.3556 1.5249 4.9000e- 003
637.9391
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 49 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.9788 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 1.6582 0.4725 14.9118 0.0498 2.4352 2.4352 2.4352 2.4352 323.5795 267.2890 590.8685 1.5178 4.9000e- 003
630.2736
Landscaping 0.1368 0.0527 4.5710 2.4000e-
004

0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0000 7.4871 7.4871 7.1400e- 003

0.0000 7.6655
Total 7.0764 0.5251 19.4828 0.0500 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 2.4606 323.5795 274.7760 598.3556 1.5249 4.9000e- 003
637.9391
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 50 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 55.8114 1.8597 0.0445 115.5682
Unmitigated 55.8114 1.8597 0.0445 115.5682
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 51 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

19.2856 /

12.1583

19.7110 0.6306 0.0151 39.9777
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.711096 /

0.435833

0.7227 0.0233 5.6000e-
004

1.4700
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

7.2241 /

0.461113

6.0579 0.2360 5.6300e-
003

13.6365
General Office
Building

2.77265 /

1.69936

2.8181 0.0907 2.1700e-
003

5.7316
Hotel 2.81571 /

0.312857

2.4043 0.0920 2.2000e-
003

5.3586
Medical Office
Building

1.22971 /

0.23423

1.0816 0.0402 9.6000e-
004

2.3722
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant

1.8212 /

0.116247

1.5272 0.0595 1.4200e-
003

3.4378
Regional
Shopping Center

0.111109 /

0.0680989

0.1129 3.6300e-
003

9.0000e-
005

0.2297
Single Family
Housing

20.9144 /

13.1852

21.3757 0.6839 0.0164 43.3542
Total 55.8115 1.8597 0.0445 115.5682
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 52 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

19.2856 /

12.1583

19.7110 0.6306 0.0151 39.9777
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

0.711096 /

0.435833

0.7227 0.0233 5.6000e-
004

1.4700
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

7.2241 /

0.461113

6.0579 0.2360 5.6300e-
003

13.6365
General Office
Building

2.77265 /

1.69936

2.8181 0.0907 2.1700e-
003

5.7316
Hotel 2.81571 /

0.312857

2.4043 0.0920 2.2000e-
003

5.3586
Medical Office
Building

1.22971 /

0.23423

1.0816 0.0402 9.6000e-
004

2.3722
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant

1.8212 /

0.116247

1.5272 0.0595 1.4200e-
003

3.4378
Regional
Shopping Center

0.111109 /

0.0680989

0.1129 3.6300e-
003

9.0000e-
005

0.2297
Single Family
Housing

20.9144 /

13.1852

21.3757 0.6839 0.0164 43.3542
Total 55.8115 1.8597 0.0445 115.5682
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 53 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 201.7345 11.9222 0.0000 499.7886
Unmitigated 201.7345 11.9222 0.0000 499.7886
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 54 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e
136.16 27.6393 1.6334 0.0000 68.4751
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

28.85 5.8563 0.3461 0.0000 14.5087
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
274.15 55.6500 3.2888 0.0000 137.8705
General Office
Building

14.51 2.9454 0.1741 0.0000 7.2971
Hotel 60.77 12.3358 0.7290 0.0000 30.5613
Medical Office
Building
105.84 21.4846 1.2697 0.0000 53.2271
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant

5.47 1.1104 0.0656 0.0000 2.7509
Regional
Shopping Center

1.58 0.3207 0.0190 0.0000 0.7946
Single Family
Housing
366.48 74.3921 4.3965 0.0000 184.3034
Total 201.7345 11.9222 0.0000 499.7886
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 55 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e
136.16 27.6393 1.6334 0.0000 68.4751
Convenience
Market with Gas
Pumps

28.85 5.8563 0.3461 0.0000 14.5087
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
274.15 55.6500 3.2888 0.0000 137.8705
General Office
Building

14.51 2.9454 0.1741 0.0000 7.2971
Hotel 60.77 12.3358 0.7290 0.0000 30.5613
Medical Office
Building
105.84 21.4846 1.2697 0.0000 53.2271
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant

5.47 1.1104 0.0656 0.0000 2.7509
Regional
Shopping Center

1.58 0.3207 0.0190 0.0000 0.7946
Single Family
Housing
366.48 74.3921 4.3965 0.0000 184.3034
Total 201.7345 11.9222 0.0000 499.7886
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 56 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

11.0 Vegetation
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT
Unmitigated -619.2560 0.0000 0.0000 -619.2560

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 57 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

11.1 Vegetation Land Change
Initial/Fina
l
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Acres MT
Cropland 99.88 / 0 -619.2560 0.0000 0.0000 -619.2560
Total -619.2560 0.0000 0.0000 -619.2560
Vegetation Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:13 PMPage 58 of 58 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
2021 Cannery Park Project
San Joaquin County, Summer

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 4.80 1000sqft 0.59 4,800.00 0
General Office Building 5.40 1000sqft 0.63 5,400.00 0
General Office Building 5.40 1000sqft 0.64 5,400.00 0
Medical Office Building 4.20 1000sqft 0.80 4,200.00 0
Medical Office Building 5.60 1000sqft 0.70 5,600.00 0
Parking Lot 23.65 1000sqft 2.92 23,653.08 0
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 2.30 1000sqft 0.99 2,300.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 4.50 1000sqft 1.68 4,500.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 3.00 1000sqft 0.94 3,000.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 7.20 1000sqft 0.90 7,200.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 6.80 1000sqft 0.82 6,800.00 0 Hotel 111.00 Room 2.59 161,172.00 0
Quality Restaurant 6.00 1000sqft 1.08 6,000.00 0
Condo/Townhouse 296.00 Dwelling Unit 12.34 296,000.00 939 Single Family Housing 321.00 Dwelling Unit 67.70 577,800.00 1018 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 4.00 1000sqft 1.44 4,000.00 0 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 5.60 1000sqft 1.61 5,600.00 0 Regional Shopping Center 1.50 1000sqft 1.51 1,500.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 51

1.0 Project Characteristics
2030Operational Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 1 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Actual Acreage;
Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on project size and details.

Off-road Equipment -
Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Trips consistent with Traffic Impact Assessment (Fehr & Peers). Institute of Transportation Engineers 2017.

Energy Use -
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Construction mitigation: Water Exposed Area 2x daily; Clean Paved Road (9% fugitive dust PM reduction); Unpaved road mitigation: Limit on-site construction vehicle speeds to 5 mph; Soil Stabilizer for unpaved (10% reduction) Fleet Mix -

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 5 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 23,650.00 23,653.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.11 0.59
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 0.63
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 0.64
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.10 0.80
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.13 0.70
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.54 2.92
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.05 0.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 2 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.07 0.94
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.10 1.68
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.16 0.82
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.90
tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.70 2.59
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.14 1.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 18.50 12.34
tblLandUse LotAcreage 104.22 67.70
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.09 1.44
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.13 1.61
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.03 1.51
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 3 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6959 38.8834 29.6001 0.0636 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 6,165.353 3 6,165.353
3 1.9487 4.0500e-
003
6,215.275
5 2023 3.3869 34.5505 28.5887 0.0802 9.3679 1.4253 10.7932 3.6973 1.3113 5.0086 0.0000 8,035.475 0 8,035.475
0 1.9482 0.4232 8,179.193
8 2024 2.8777 18.6393 27.6302 0.0787 4.2657 0.6598 4.9254 1.1479 0.6207 1.7687 0.0000 7,888.693 7 7,888.693
7 0.6916 0.4113 8,028.556
4 2025 2.6762 17.5756 26.7792 0.0773 4.2657 0.5732 4.8389 1.1479 0.5394 1.6873 0.0000 7,744.188 2 7,744.188
2 0.6800 0.3997 7,880.307
0 2026 2.5936 17.4908 26.2341 0.0760 4.2657 0.5724 4.8381 1.1479 0.5386 1.6866 0.0000 7,607.856 3 7,607.856
3 0.6732 0.3890 7,740.605
2 2027 2.5197 17.4100 25.6980 0.0747 4.2657 0.5714 4.8371 1.1479 0.5377 1.6856 0.0000 7,478.606 8 7,478.606
8 0.6672 0.3786 7,608.097
2 2028 2.4533 17.3468 25.2579 0.0736 4.2657 0.5703 4.8361 1.1479 0.5367 1.6846 0.0000 7,360.812 6 7,360.812
6 0.6621 0.3691 7,487.350
7 2029 178.3147 17.2876 24.8864 0.0725 4.2657 0.5693 4.8350 1.1479 0.5358 1.6837 0.0000 7,252.739 4 7,252.739
4 0.7154 0.3603 7,376.562
6 2030 178.2635 0.9314 3.2417 8.1100e-
003

0.7065 0.0226 0.7290 0.1874 0.0224 0.2098 0.0000 801.4550 801.4550 0.0202 0.0108 805.1689 Maximum 178.3147 38.8834 29.6001 0.0802 19.8049 1.6357 21.4182 10.1417 1.5049 11.6259 0.0000 8,035.475 0 8,035.475
0 1.9487 0.4232 8,179.193
8 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 4 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.6959 38.8834 29.6001 0.0636 8.9820 1.6357 10.5953 4.5825 1.5049 6.0667 0.0000 6,165.353 3 6,165.353
3 1.9487 4.0500e-
003
6,215.275
5 2023 3.3869 34.5505 28.5887 0.0802 4.2931 1.4253 5.7183 1.6846 1.3113 2.9959 0.0000 8,035.475 0 8,035.475
0 1.9482 0.4232 8,179.193
8 2024 2.8777 18.6393 27.6302 0.0787 3.9423 0.6598 4.6020 1.0685 0.6207 1.6893 0.0000 7,888.693 7 7,888.693
7 0.6916 0.4113 8,028.556
4 2025 2.6762 17.5756 26.7792 0.0773 3.9423 0.5732 4.5155 1.0685 0.5394 1.6079 0.0000 7,744.188 2 7,744.188
2 0.6800 0.3997 7,880.307
0 2026 2.5936 17.4908 26.2341 0.0760 3.9423 0.5724 4.5147 1.0685 0.5386 1.6072 0.0000 7,607.856 3 7,607.856
3 0.6732 0.3890 7,740.605
2 2027 2.5197 17.4100 25.6980 0.0747 3.9423 0.5714 4.5137 1.0685 0.5377 1.6062 0.0000 7,478.606 8 7,478.606
8 0.6672 0.3786 7,608.097
2 2028 2.4533 17.3468 25.2579 0.0736 3.9423 0.5703 4.5127 1.0685 0.5367 1.6053 0.0000 7,360.812 6 7,360.812
6 0.6621 0.3691 7,487.350
7 2029 178.3147 17.2876 24.8864 0.0725 3.9423 0.5693 4.5116 1.0685 0.5358 1.6043 0.0000 7,252.739 4 7,252.739
4 0.7154 0.3603 7,376.562
6 2030 178.2635 0.9314 3.2417 8.1100e-
003

0.6512 0.0226 0.6738 0.1738 0.0224 0.1962 0.0000 801.4550 801.4550 0.0202 0.0108 805.1689 Maximum 178.3147 38.8834 29.6001 0.0802 8.9820 1.6357 10.5953 4.5825 1.5049 6.0667 0.0000 8,035.475 0 8,035.475
0 1.9487 0.4232 8,179.193
8 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.26 0.00 28.84 38.55 0.00 29.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 5 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 70.9029 12.1087 414.4909 1.2174 59.6782 59.6782 59.6782 59.6782 8,699.643 7 7,277.936
0 15,977.57
97 40.8942 0.1318 17,039.19
65 Energy 0.6275 5.4917 3.2337 0.0342 0.4335 0.4335 0.4335 0.4335 6,844.886 4 6,844.886
4 0.1312 0.1255 6,885.562
2 Mobile 50.2870 45.5847 313.1729 0.6705 76.6362 0.4962 77.1323 20.4292 0.4644 20.8935 68,325.47 84 68,325.47
84 4.1168 3.7893 69,557.60
51 Total 121.8174 63.1851 730.8975 1.9222 76.6362 60.6078 137.2440 20.4292 60.5760 81.0052 8,699.643 7 82,448.30
08 91,147.94
45 45.1422 4.0465 93,482.36
38 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 70.9029 12.1087 414.4909 1.2174 59.6782 59.6782 59.6782 59.6782 8,699.643 7 7,277.936
0 15,977.57
97 40.8942 0.1318 17,039.19
65 Energy 0.6275 5.4917 3.2337 0.0342 0.4335 0.4335 0.4335 0.4335 6,844.886 4 6,844.886
4 0.1312 0.1255 6,885.562
2 Mobile 50.2870 45.5847 313.1729 0.6705 76.6362 0.4962 77.1323 20.4292 0.4644 20.8935 68,325.47 84 68,325.47
84 4.1168 3.7893 69,557.60
51 Total 121.8174 63.1851 730.8975 1.9222 76.6362 60.6078 137.2440 20.4292 60.5760 81.0052 8,699.643 7 82,448.30
08 91,147.94
45 45.1422 4.0465 93,482.36
38 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 6 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/1/2022 11/23/2022 5 60 2 Grading Grading 11/24/2022 6/28/2023 5 155
3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/29/2023 6/6/2029 5 1550 4 Paving Paving 6/7/2029 11/7/2029 5 110
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/8/2029 4/10/2030 5 110 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 1,769,445; Residential Outdoor: 589,815; Non-Residential Indoor: 341,208; Non-Residential Outdoor: 113,736; Striped Parking Area: 1,419 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465
Acres of Paving: 2.92
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 7 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 431.00 107.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 86.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 8 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1479 7.5000e-
004

0.1486 0.0392 6.9000e-
004

0.0399 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Total 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1479 7.5000e-
004

0.1486 0.0392 6.9000e-
004

0.0399 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 9 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.8457 1.6126 10.4582 4.5461 1.4836 6.0297 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1363 7.5000e-
004

0.1371 0.0364 6.9000e-
004

0.0371 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Total 0.0639 0.0360 0.5028 1.3700e-
003

0.1363 7.5000e-
004

0.1371 0.0364 6.9000e-
004

0.0371 138.5485 138.5485 4.0000e-
003

3.6400e-
003
139.7337
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 10 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 9.2036 1.6349 10.8385 3.6538 1.5041 5.1579 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1643 8.3000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.7000e-
004

0.0444 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Total 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1643 8.3000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.7000e-
004

0.0444 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 11 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 4.1416 1.6349 5.7765 1.6442 1.5041 3.1483 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1514 8.3000e-
004

0.1523 0.0404 7.7000e-
004

0.0412 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Total 0.0710 0.0400 0.5586 1.5200e-
003

0.1514 8.3000e-
004

0.1523 0.0404 7.7000e-
004

0.0412 153.9427 153.9427 4.4500e-
003

4.0500e-
003
155.2596
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 12 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1643 7.9000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.2000e-
004

0.0443 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Total 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1643 7.9000e-
004

0.1651 0.0436 7.2000e-
004

0.0443 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 13 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.1416 0.0000 4.1416 1.6442 0.0000 1.6442 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 4.1416 1.4245 5.5661 1.6442 1.3105 2.9547 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1514 7.9000e-
004

0.1522 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0412 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Total 0.0651 0.0349 0.5092 1.4700e-
003

0.1514 7.9000e-
004

0.1522 0.0404 7.2000e-
004

0.0412 148.9370 148.9370 3.9700e-
003

3.7100e-
003
150.1429
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 14 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1165 4.5325 1.3726 0.0215 0.7251 0.0302 0.7554 0.2088 0.0289 0.2377 2,270.673 6 2,270.673
6 0.0113 0.3431 2,373.208
4 Worker 1.4033 0.7516 10.9721 0.0318 3.5406 0.0169 3.5575 0.9391 0.0156 0.9547 3,209.591 5 3,209.591
5 0.0855 0.0800 3,235.579
3 Total 1.5198 5.2842 12.3447 0.0532 4.2657 0.0472 4.3129 1.1479 0.0445 1.1924 5,480.265 1 5,480.265
1 0.0968 0.4232 5,608.787
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 15 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1165 4.5325 1.3726 0.0215 0.6787 0.0302 0.7089 0.1974 0.0289 0.2263 2,270.673 6 2,270.673
6 0.0113 0.3431 2,373.208
4 Worker 1.4033 0.7516 10.9721 0.0318 3.2636 0.0169 3.2806 0.8712 0.0156 0.8867 3,209.591 5 3,209.591
5 0.0855 0.0800 3,235.579
3 Total 1.5198 5.2842 12.3447 0.0532 3.9423 0.0472 3.9894 1.0685 0.0445 1.1130 5,480.265 1 5,480.265
1 0.0968 0.4232 5,608.787
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 16 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1138 4.5352 1.3456 0.0211 0.7251 0.0305 0.7556 0.2088 0.0292 0.2380 2,235.387 2 2,235.387
2 0.0108 0.3374 2,336.209
0 Worker 1.2923 0.6603 10.1178 0.0307 3.5406 0.0160 3.5565 0.9391 0.0147 0.9538 3,097.607 7 3,097.607
7 0.0764 0.0739 3,121.539
8 Total 1.4062 5.1955 11.4634 0.0518 4.2657 0.0464 4.3121 1.1479 0.0438 1.1918 5,332.994 8 5,332.994
8 0.0872 0.4113 5,457.748
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 17 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1138 4.5352 1.3456 0.0211 0.6787 0.0305 0.7092 0.1974 0.0292 0.2266 2,235.387 2 2,235.387
2 0.0108 0.3374 2,336.209
0 Worker 1.2923 0.6603 10.1178 0.0307 3.2636 0.0160 3.2796 0.8712 0.0147 0.8858 3,097.607 7 3,097.607
7 0.0764 0.0739 3,121.539
8 Total 1.4062 5.1955 11.4634 0.0518 3.9423 0.0464 3.9887 1.0685 0.0438 1.1124 5,332.994 8 5,332.994
8 0.0872 0.4113 5,457.748
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 18 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1114 4.5197 1.3223 0.0208 0.7251 0.0305 0.7556 0.2088 0.0292 0.2380 2,195.627 6 2,195.627
6 0.0104 0.3310 2,294.517
8 Worker 1.1974 0.5862 9.3723 0.0296 3.5406 0.0152 3.5557 0.9391 0.0140 0.9531 2,992.086 3 2,992.086
3 0.0686 0.0688 3,014.291
1 Total 1.3088 5.1059 10.6946 0.0504 4.2657 0.0457 4.3114 1.1479 0.0431 1.1910 5,187.713 8 5,187.713
8 0.0790 0.3997 5,308.808
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 19 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1114 4.5197 1.3223 0.0208 0.6787 0.0305 0.7092 0.1974 0.0292 0.2266 2,195.627 6 2,195.627
6 0.0104 0.3310 2,294.517
8 Worker 1.1974 0.5862 9.3723 0.0296 3.2636 0.0152 3.2788 0.8712 0.0140 0.8851 2,992.086 3 2,992.086
3 0.0686 0.0688 3,014.291
1 Total 1.3088 5.1059 10.6946 0.0504 3.9423 0.0457 3.9880 1.0685 0.0431 1.1117 5,187.713 8 5,187.713
8 0.0790 0.3997 5,308.808
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 20 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1094 4.4945 1.3032 0.0204 0.7252 0.0304 0.7555 0.2088 0.0290 0.2378 2,155.102 1 2,155.102
1 0.0101 0.3244 2,252.028
9 Worker 1.1169 0.5266 8.8462 0.0287 3.5406 0.0145 3.5551 0.9391 0.0134 0.9525 2,896.279 8 2,896.279
8 0.0622 0.0646 2,917.078
2 Total 1.2262 5.0211 10.1495 0.0490 4.2657 0.0449 4.3106 1.1479 0.0424 1.1903 5,051.381 9 5,051.381
9 0.0722 0.3890 5,169.107
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 21 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1094 4.4945 1.3032 0.0204 0.6787 0.0304 0.7090 0.1974 0.0290 0.2264 2,155.102 1 2,155.102
1 0.0101 0.3244 2,252.028
9 Worker 1.1169 0.5266 8.8462 0.0287 3.2636 0.0145 3.2781 0.8712 0.0134 0.8845 2,896.279 8 2,896.279
8 0.0622 0.0646 2,917.078
2 Total 1.2262 5.0211 10.1495 0.0490 3.9423 0.0449 3.9872 1.0685 0.0424 1.1109 5,051.381 9 5,051.381
9 0.0722 0.3890 5,169.107
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 22 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1075 4.4629 1.2868 0.0200 0.7252 0.0301 0.7553 0.2088 0.0288 0.2376 2,111.428 4 2,111.428
4 9.7000e-
003

0.3175 2,206.273
1 Worker 1.0448 0.4774 8.3266 0.0278 3.5406 0.0137 3.5542 0.9391 0.0126 0.9517 2,810.704 0 2,810.704
0 0.0565 0.0611 2,830.326
1 Total 1.1523 4.9403 9.6134 0.0478 4.2657 0.0438 4.3095 1.1479 0.0414 1.1893 4,922.132 4 4,922.132
4 0.0662 0.3786 5,036.599
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 23 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1075 4.4629 1.2868 0.0200 0.6787 0.0301 0.7088 0.1974 0.0288 0.2262 2,111.428 4 2,111.428
4 9.7000e-
003

0.3175 2,206.273
1 Worker 1.0448 0.4774 8.3266 0.0278 3.2636 0.0137 3.2773 0.8712 0.0126 0.8837 2,810.704 0 2,810.704
0 0.0565 0.0611 2,830.326
1 Total 1.1523 4.9403 9.6134 0.0478 3.9423 0.0438 3.9861 1.0685 0.0414 1.1100 4,922.132 4 4,922.132
4 0.0662 0.3786 5,036.599
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 24 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1060 4.4400 1.2738 0.0196 0.7252 0.0300 0.7551 0.2088 0.0287 0.2375 2,069.980 9 2,069.980
9 9.4200e-
003

0.3108 2,162.842
0 Worker 0.9799 0.4372 7.8994 0.0271 3.5406 0.0128 3.5534 0.9391 0.0118 0.9509 2,734.357 4 2,734.357
4 0.0518 0.0583 2,753.010
6 Total 1.0859 4.8772 9.1732 0.0466 4.2657 0.0428 4.3085 1.1479 0.0405 1.1884 4,804.338 3 4,804.338
3 0.0612 0.3691 4,915.852
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 25 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1060 4.4400 1.2738 0.0196 0.6787 0.0300 0.7086 0.1974 0.0287 0.2261 2,069.980 9 2,069.980
9 9.4200e-
003

0.3108 2,162.842
0 Worker 0.9799 0.4372 7.8994 0.0271 3.2636 0.0128 3.2765 0.8712 0.0118 0.8829 2,734.357 4 2,734.357
4 0.0518 0.0583 2,753.010
6 Total 1.0859 4.8772 9.1732 0.0466 3.9423 0.0428 3.9851 1.0685 0.0405 1.1090 4,804.338 3 4,804.338
3 0.0612 0.3691 4,915.852
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 26 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1047 4.4139 1.2629 0.0192 0.7252 0.0297 0.7549 0.2088 0.0285 0.2373 2,029.869 0 2,029.869
0 9.1700e-
003

0.3044 2,120.817
0 Worker 0.9204 0.4041 7.5388 0.0264 3.5406 0.0120 3.5526 0.9391 0.0111 0.9502 2,666.396 0 2,666.396
0 0.0476 0.0559 2,684.247
5 Total 1.0251 4.8180 8.8017 0.0456 4.2657 0.0417 4.3075 1.1479 0.0395 1.1874 4,696.265 0 4,696.265
0 0.0568 0.3603 4,805.064
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 27 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 4 2,556.474
4 0.6010 2,571.498
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1047 4.4139 1.2629 0.0192 0.6787 0.0297 0.7084 0.1974 0.0285 0.2258 2,029.869 0 2,029.869
0 9.1700e-
003

0.3044 2,120.817
0 Worker 0.9204 0.4041 7.5388 0.0264 3.2636 0.0120 3.2756 0.8712 0.0111 0.8822 2,666.396 0 2,666.396
0 0.0476 0.0559 2,684.247
5 Total 1.0251 4.8180 8.8017 0.0456 3.9423 0.0417 3.9841 1.0685 0.0395 1.1080 4,696.265 0 4,696.265
0 0.0568 0.3603 4,805.064
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/1/2022 12:15 PMPage 28 of 45 2021 Cannery Park Project - San Joaquin County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied EXHIBIT 1

3.5 Paving - 2029
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0696 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9847 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0320 0.0141 0.2624 9.2000e-
004