Within the Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton Road
neighborhood, a mix of unit potential at all income
levels has been identified in tract 32.08 in a highest
resource neighborhood which fosters income
integration housing mobility opportunities at all income levels. Tract 32.08 has one of the highest median
incomes and lowest poverty rates in the city, a primarily homeowner tenure, and moderate rates of renters
experiencing a cost burden in comparison to the city
average. Although less than one percent of the lowerincome unit capacity is identified in this tract, it does provide housing mobility opportunities in a higher
resource area while contributing towards a reduction in the concentration of lower-income households and
displacement risk in other areas of the city. Similarly, 0.9 percent of the lower-income unit capacity, co-sited with
0.3 percent of moderate-income unit capacity, is
identified in tract 31.14 in the Brookside/Country Club neighborhood, providing income integration and
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1196
BR-140 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
housing mobility opportunities in a Highest Resource
area.
Overall, in those tracts with moderate and above
median incomes, the identification of lower-income unit capacity provides housing mobility opportunities for
lower-income households which may have higher
environmental, educational outcome or economic
outcome rankings, while helping to reduce
concentrations of poverty and lower-income
populations in more socioeconomically impacted areas
of the city. Conversely, the inclusion of moderate- and above moderate-income sites in lower performing tracts
is to facilitate income-integration and combat patterns of concentrated poverty.
The city will encourage higher density and affordable
housing development in areas with higher incomes and
access to resources by promoting the use of density
bonus for affordable housing in higher-income and
resource areas, and targeting the construction of ADUs
in higher-income single-family neighborhoods including
Brookside/Country Club, Weston Ranch, Eight
Mile/Bear Creek, Midtown around the University of the
Pacific (between I-5 and Pacific Avenue’s “Miracle
Mile”), western Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton Rd, and
eastern Morada/Holman to promote access to
resources and mobility opportunities for lower-income
households, prioritizing new infill and development of
vacant land opportunities in higher-income
neighborhoods. As well, the City will determine the
potential for requiring affordable units in development agreements when initiating discussions with applicant to facilitate mixed-income neighborhoods and provide
lower-income households increased access to more
positive educational, economic and environmental
health outcomes in newly developing areas.
To confirm whether the sites identified in the Housing
Element inventory will affirmatively further fair housing, the City examined the TCAC/HCD opportunity area
map as well as specific geographic patterns of
resources. While the City of Stockton includes a range
of resource designations by TCAC and HCD with fairly
distinct distribution patterns, additional indicators are evaluated to determine whether the sites inventory
affirmatively furthers fair housing.
Figures HE-24 through HE-35 compare the total unit
capacity to citywide indicators of fair housing for a
comprehensive comparison of how the sites inventory
will influence existing patterns. For the purpose of this analysis, “vacant” refers to sites that are currently
undeveloped without plans for development and
“pipeline projects” are projects that are entitled or
pending where proposed number of units and proposed
affordability of units are known.
POTENTIAL EFFECT ON
PATTERNS OF
INTEGRATION AND
SEGREGATION
Capacity for 23,168 units, including 5,450 lowerincome, 3,339 moderate-income, and 14,379 abovemoderate income units has been identified to meet the City’s RHNA, including estimated ADU capacity. The
majority of above moderate-income capacity (97.3
percent) is within approved pipeline project sites, some of which are final phases of larger developments.
As shown on Figures M1 through M28 in Appendix A,
and Table HE-48, Distribution of RHNA Capacity by
Census Tract, sites identified to accommodate the
lower-income RHNA are primarily located in the
Downtown and southern portion of the city where prior
analysis has indicated the risk of displacement is highest for residents that currently may face a shortage of
affordable options. Approximately 23.8 percent of the
lower-income units are identified within the South
Stockton neighborhood; and 10.8 percent in the
Downtown. As well, 29.6 percent of the lower-income
units are identified in the Weston/Van Buskirk and 6.8
percent in the Industrial Annex neighborhoods, with an
additional 4.4 percent within the East Stockton
neighborhood. Sites with lower-income units have also
been identified in block groups with the Boggs Tract,
Eight Mile/Bear Creek, Brookside/Country Club,
Trinity/Northwest Stockton, Morada/Holman, Pacific
Ave/Lincoln Village, Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton
Road and Midtown neighborhoods where displacement
risk of lower-income households and persons in poverty
has been identified and to provide housing mobility
opportunities.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1197
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-141
Sites with capacity for 3,285 moderate-income units are mainly located in the central and southern portions of
the city, including 32.1 percent of the unit capacity in South Stockton; 2.2 percent in the Port and Mt. Diablo
Waterfront neighborhood; 12.0 percent within the
Downtown; 10.6 percent in East Stockton; and 11.7
percent in the Weston/Van Buskirk neighborhood. The
remainder is spread throughout the city with 8.7 percent of moderate-income units in the Trinity/Northwest
neighborhood, 5.1 percent in Midtown, 5.8 percent in
the Morada/Holman neighborhood, 3.0 percent in the
Brookside/Country Club neighborhood, 2.8 percent in
the Eight Mile/Bear Creek neighborhood, 3.3 Percent in
the Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton Road
neighborhood, 1.9 percent in the Pacific
Avenue/Lincoln Village neighborhood, and 0.1 percent
in the Industrial Annex..
Sites with capacity for 14,361 above moderate-income
sites are identified almost exclusively within entitled pipeline projects, the majority of which are located
within the Trinity/Northwest neighborhood.
Approximately 97.3 percent of above moderate-income
unit capacity is identified in pipeline projects as
discussed in Chapter 4 within the Trinity/Northwest
section of the city (see Figures M1 through M28 in
Appendix A); 10.7 percent in the Tra Vigne development
in the Eight Mile/Bear Creek neighborhood, and 3.8
percent within the Cannery Park and Elderberry pipeline projects in the Morada/Holman neighborhood. Above
moderate-income RHNA sites are also identified in
Midtown, South Stockton and Upper Hammer Lane
neighborhoods.
The sites to meet the RHNA identify development
opportunities on vacant land. As shown on Figure HE24, Percent Unit Capacity by TCAC/HCD Resource Designation, 18.5 percent of total unit capacity is
located within an Area of High Segregation and Poverty,
14.8 percent is within low resource areas, and 63.8
percent of unit capacity is identified within the high and highest resource designations, largely along the west
side of the city. A small portion of site capacity is
identified in moderate and rapidly changing moderate
resource designations.
The majority of the lower-income unit capacity is
identified in low resource (46.7 percent) and High
Segregation and Poverty (33.1 percent) areas, with the
largest distributions in the Downtown, South and East
Stockton, Industrial Annex, the northern portion of
Weston/Van Buskirk and in the Morada/Holman
neighborhood in the Akers area around the intersection
of West and Hammer Lanes, which will assist in meeting
the existing needs of lower-income households in
securing affordable housing. An additional 14.5
percent of lower-income unit capacity is identified in
high/highest resource areas, including the Brookside
and Midtown neighborhoods, and 2.4 percent in
moderate resource areas, which facilitates housing
mobility opportunities, including in the
Morada/Holman, and Upper Hammer/Thornton Rd.
neighborhoods.
As discussed previously, the majority of above
moderate-income sites are approved projects, with 42.9
percent in high/highest resource areas, and 51.7
percent in high resource designations in Midtown and
scattered sites in the central section of the city facilitating income-integration. The highest proportion of units
identified within the moderate resource designation are moderate-income (8.9 percent of moderate-income
unit capacity) which facilitates housing mobility
opportunities, although limited, with 49.9 percent of
moderate-income unit capacity within Areas of High
Segregation and Poverty and 24.2 percent within low
resource designated areas, thus facilitating incomeintegration. Otherwise, all sites with the exception of those discussed previously are located within a low
resource designation.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1198
BR-142 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Figure HE-24: Percent Unit Capacity by
TCAC/HCD Resource Designation
Source: City of Stockton and TCAC 2022
INCOME
As shown in Figure HE-25, Percent Unit Capacity by
Median Income, the City has identified capacity for 13.2 percent of the units in the Sites Inventory in areas that have very low median incomes below $29,147 based
on the 2020 San Joaquin County median income, and
11.1 percent in tracts with low median-income
households (between $29,198 and $46,714)
corresponding to higher rates of overcrowding and
overpayment. In contrast, 67.6 percent of unit capacity is identified in Stockton’s highest-income block groups around the west, north and eastern perimeter of the city, in the vicinity of University of the Pacific in Midtown, and block groups in the Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton Rd.
neighborhood. An additional 8.1 percent of the city’s
unit capacity is identified within moderate-income areas (see Figure 3-8, Local Median Income). While
approximately 53.9 percent of the lower-income
capacity has been identified on sites with very low or low median incomes, these sites aim to reduce displacement
risk for residents in these areas that currently may face a shortage of affordable options. Approximately 5.4
percent of the above moderate-income, and 55.0
percent of moderate-income unit capacity are also
identified in lower-income neighborhoods. The
distribution of these sites accommodating higherincome units will help facilitate mixed-income communities without concentrating lower-income units
in lower-income areas.
Figure HE-25: Percent Unit Capacity by
Median Income
Source: City of Stockton and ACS 2015-2019
Block groups that correlate to moderate-incomes are
primarily found in clusters throughout the central
portions of the city. To help reduce income segregation spurred by the siting of a greater proportion of
affordable multifamily developments between West
Lane and Pacific Avenue, and along West Lane, 20.0
percent of lower-income unit capacity and 22.4 percent
of moderate-income unit capacity have been identified
for sites within moderate-income areas of the city; 22.6 percent of moderate and 26.3 percent of lower-income
unit capacity is identified in higher income
neighborhoods. These increased housing mobility
opportunities may alleviate pressure on the existing
lower-income housing stock in the central Pacific
Avenue/Lincoln Village, Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton
1.4%
8.0%
42.9%
27.7%
13.1%
8.7%
51.7%
36.1%
2.4%
8.9%
1.9%
3.3%
0.3%
0.2%
1.0%
46.7%
24.2%
14.8%
33.1%
49.9%
5.1%
18.5%
0.0% 20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income
Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
Highest Resource
High Resource
Moderate Resource
Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing)
Low Resource
High Segregation & Poverty
21.6%
36.3%
4.4%
13.2%
32.2%
18.7%
1.0%
11.1%
20.0%
22.4%
8.1%
26.3%
22.6%
94.6%
67.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
Less than or equal to $29,197 (Very Low Income)
$29,198 to $46,714 (Low Income)
$46715 to $70,072 (Moderate Income)
$70,073 or Greater (Above Moderate Income)
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1199
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-143
Rd., Morada/Holman, northern Midtown and portions
of Eight Mile/Bear Creek neighborhoods that has
resulted in renter overpayment and increasing home
ownership prices, serves as a mechanism for achieving
income integration and increased access to higher
resource opportunities, and fosters de-concentration of lower-income households in the Downtown and
southern portions of the city, as well as the two identified R/ECAPS in the central portion of the city.
Almost all of the above moderate-income unit capacity
is associated with sites in the higher-income sections of the city, predominantly in newly developing
neighborhoods in the Trinity/Northwest and Eight
Mile/Bear Creek neighborhoods, providing housing
mobility opportunities for existing and future residents.
In Stockton, 13.7 percent of households make less than
30.0 percent of area median income, which is
considered extremely low-income. Conversely, rates of
poverty are below 10.0 percent in the eastern, northern and western portions of the city as well as a cluster of centrally located neighborhoods east of I-5 in the Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village neighborhood. Low rates of
poverty in these localities may indicate that high costs of housing are a barrier to access for lower-income
households seeking housing, forcing these households
to seek housing in more affordable areas. Higher rates
are found in the central and southern neighborhoods
that coincide with the city’s lower-income block groups and HUD identified R/ECAPS (Figure HE-3, Local
Poverty Rates and Figure HE-5, R/ECAPS in Stockton),
where housing typology and the presence of
distribution, shipping and industrial uses likely accounts for more housing affordability and higher rates of
poverty in these areas. These areas have historically
been used as ship and rail yard worker housing, include the historical Chinatown community, and several tracts
were redlined areas, with patterns of low incomes
persisting in these areas.
As shown by Figure HE-26, Percent Unit Capacity by
Poverty Rate, 74.3 percent of the total unit capacity has been identified on sites where rates of poverty are below
20.0 percent, and 10.0 percent of unit capacity is
identified in neighborhoods with a poverty rate between
20.0 and 29.9 percent of households. A small portion
of the unit capacity, 10.2 percent, falls in residential neighborhoods within 30.0 to 39.9 percent poverty rate
tracts, and the remaining 5.5 percent are identified in the tracts with the highest poverty rate correlating to the TCAC/HCD Areas of High Segregation and Poverty and
R/ECAPS with rates of poverty over 40.0 percent.
Figure HE-26, Percent Unit Capacity by
Poverty Rate
Source: City of Stockton and ACS 2015-2019
The inclusion of 4.4 percent of above moderate-income
and 40.6 percent of moderate-income unit capacity in
the two highest poverty rate block groups encompassed
within and in-between the Areas of High Segregation
helps integrate higher-income households into these
areas where a concentration of lower-income
households and populations of color currently exists.
This will promote income integration in these
communities where many existing affordable multifamily
complexes have contributed to the concentration of
lower-income households. The inclusion of 29.3
percent of lower-income unit capacity within these high poverty rate neighborhoods will help reduce
displacement risk for lower-income households residing
in these neighborhoods, with access to commercial,
services and amenities in the Downtown, whereas sites
for lower-income households within the two lowest
poverty rate portions of the city (70.7 percent) facilitate housing mobility opportunities for lower-income
households and contribute to the reduction of
45.0%
37.6%
94.6%
74.3%
25.8%
21.7%
1.0%
10.0%
15.8%
25.1%
4.4%
10.2%
13.5%
15.6%
5.5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
Fewer than 20.0% of Households
20.0% to 29.9% of Households
30.0% to 39.9% of Households
40.0% or More of Households
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1200
BR-144 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
concentration of affordable housing and correlation of
these resources with high poverty rates.
RACE AND ETHNICITY
As discussed previously, Stockton is one of the more
diverse cities in San Joaquin County, with non-White
residents comprising 80.6 percent of the city’s
population. White residents comprise majorities in the
Brookside/Country Club and Trinity/Northwest
neighborhoods west of I-5, and census tracts within
Eight Mile/Bear Creek, western Upper Hammer
Lane/Thornton Rd., western Pacific Avenue/Lincoln
Village and tracts including University of the Pacific in the midtown neighborhood; many of which include
planned golf course and lakeside communities which
generally correspond with low poverty rates and
moderate to higher-income households. The city’s
lowest income and heavily non-White communities are
found in the northeast and eastern sections of the city (Figure HE-4, Local Racial Demographics), along
March Lane, and neighborhoods south of, and
including, Downtown, many of which tend to be found
closer to non-residential uses. While neighborhoods in
the southern portion of the city tend to be predominantly Hispanic or Latinx, neighborhoods in the northeastern
sections of the city are predominantly Asian
communities, and those in the central portion of the city along March Lane between West Lane and Pacific
Avenue tend to be a heavily non-White diverse mix of
race and ethnicity.
Additional lower- and moderate-income units in the city will improve access to housing in the city for residents who would otherwise be priced out of the housing
market or experience a cost-burden and overcrowding
conditions that has historically included communities of color.
Figure HE-27: Percent Unit Capacity by
Non-White Population
Source: City of Stockton and ACS 2015-2019
As shown in Figure HE-27, Percent Unit Capacity by
Non-White Population, 69.7 percent of the unit capacity is within tracts with a non-White population between
60.0 and 79.9 percent, primarily in the northwestern
and northeastern corners of the city, and one tract in
Midtown. An additional 29.8 percent of unit capacity
falls in areas with a non-White population at or above
80.0 percent, primarily in the Port and Mount Diablo
Waterfront, and southern and eastern portions of the
city. The remaining sites are identified within the 0.5 percent of the city with a non-White population below
59.9 percent in the Brookside neighborhood.
DISABILITY
As shown on Figure HE-9, Percentage of the Population
With a Disability, approximately 13.6 percent of
Stockton’s population lives with one or more types of
disabilities, with rates reaching between 25.4 to 31.1
percent in the Downtown correlating to a concentration
of affordable housing complexes and the TCAC/HCD
High Segregation and Poverty designation as well as
1.2%
0.4%
0.2%
0.5%
25.4%
28.9%
97.0%
69.7%
73.4%
70.7%
2.8%
29.8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
Less than 59% of the Population
60% to 79% of the Population
80% to 100% of the Population
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1201
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-145
R/ECAP status; and between 20.0 to 30.0 percent in
scattered tracts in the Midtown, Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village, and Weston/Van Buskirk neighborhoods. ACS
data indicates that a higher proportion of residents who are living with a disability are residing in lower-income areas correlating with the location of affordable housing stock; in older neighborhoods where residents may be
aging in place; or in proximity to major medical
facilities, as is the case in residential areas adjacent to University of the Pacific in Midtown where the Stockton Regional Rehabilitation Hospital, St. Josephs Medical
Center, and other medical facilities are concentrated, as well as two large deed restricted multifamily complexes.
As shown on Figure HE-28, Percent Unit Capacity by
Disability Rate, the City has identified a capacity for
20.3 percent of potential units to meet the RHNA in
census tracts with less than 10.0 percent disability rate, primarily in the Brookside/Country Club,
Trinity/Northwest and Mount Diablo/Waterfront
neighborhoods, with 27.8 percent of above moderateincome, 13.9 percent of moderate-income, and 5.3 percent of lower-income unit capacity identified in these tracts which generally correspond to moderate to higher median incomes and lower poverty rates. This
distribution will improve accessibility for individuals with disabilities at all income levels within new housing
opportunities that are required to comply with current
development standards and Americans Disabilities Act
(ADA) standards.
Approximately68.5 percent of the unit capacity is
identified on sites within tracts with 10.0 to 19.9 percent of the population experiencing disabilities, which are
generally north of the Calabasas River, in the East
Stockton, the Port and Mount Diablo Waterfront,
Industrial Annex, and the more southerly sections of
Weston Ranch/Van Buskirk and South Stockton
neighborhoods. Lower-income unit capacity (71.6
percent) in tracts with higher rates of disabilities between
10.0 and 19.9 percent provides housing mobility
opportunities for current lower-income residents with
disabilities to move to housing that is ADA compliant.
Sites in the southern portion of Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village neighborhood off Pacific Avenue just north of
University of the Pacific, as well as the sites in the
Midtown neighborhood east of the San Joaquin
Catholic Cemetery are accessible to major medical
facilities. Sites in the Morada Holman neighborhood in
the vicinity of the intersection of West and March Lanes will help to improve access for, and accommodate the
needs of persons living with disabilities, benefit from close access to services and amenities as well as
proximity to transit along major commercial corridors.
Figure HE-28: Percent Unit Capacity by
Disability Rate
Source: City of Stockton and ACS 2015-2019
A large proportion of moderate-income unit capacity
(55.4 percent), as well as 70.4 percent of the abovemoderate unit capacity in these tracts described above, provide mobility opportunities for moderate and higherincome persons with disabilities in new structures which are ADA compliant and built to universal design, as well as fostering mixed-income communities where sited in
the vicinity of, or adjacent to, lower-income sites along major transportation corridors near commercial activity nodes and/or educational facilities.
A smaller share of lower-income unit capacity (12.1
percent) is identified on sites with disability rates between
20.0 and 30.0 percent of the population, primarily
within and around the Downtown, in tracts adjacent to
University of the Pacific in Midtown, in South Stockton near the junction of I-5 with the French Camp Turnpike, and on one small site in Weston Ranch/Van Buskirk.
5.3%
13.9%
27.8%
20.3%
71.6%
55.4%
70.4%
68.5%
12.1%
16.3%
1.8%
6.4%
11.0%
14.3%
4.7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
Less than 10.0% 10.0% to 19.9%
20.0% to 29.9% 30.0% or Greater
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1202
BR-146 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
There are few above moderate-income sites (1.8
percent), and 16.3 percent of moderate-income unit
capacity in sites with the higher disability rate.
The remainder of the lower- and moderate-income unit
capacity (11.0 and 14.3 percent respectively) is
identified within the Downtown, increasing the
opportunities for disabled persons currently
experiencing overpayment, homelessness or
overcrowding, as well as those living in units without
accessibility features, to acquire affordable, and
adequately accessible housing.
FAMILIAL STATUS
As previously discussed, some areas of Stockton have a
higher rate of female-headed households with children
and no spouse or partner present, and senior
households living alone. Female-headed households
with children and no spouse or partner (8.1 percent of
households) often face particular challenges to housing access and are at elevated risk of displacement.
Approximately 28.9 percent of female-headed
households with children have incomes below the
poverty line.
Similar to other indicators of fair housing, 39.0 percent of the unit capacity is identified on sites in Eight
Mile/Bear Creek, Brookside/Country Club, tracts within
Upper Hammer Lane/ Thornton Road neighborhood,
the majority of Morada/Holman neighborhood east of
West Lane, the University of the Pacific area in Midtown, the Port and Mount Diablo Waterfront, and Industrial
Annex neighborhoods in which up to 19.9 percent of
children are in female-headed households (Figure HE29, Percent Unit Capacity by Percent of Children in Female-Headed Households). Approximately 43.0
percent of higher-income unit capacity, 32.0 percent of moderate-income unit capacity, and 33.1 percent of
lower-income unit capacity is identified in these tracts, increasing the opportunities for female-headed
households currently experiencing overpayment and/or
overcrowding to acquire affordable, and adequately
sized housing in generally higher-income
neighborhoods while promoting a reduction in the
concentration of female headed households in other
parts of the city.
Figure HE-29: Percent Unit Capacity by
Percent of Children in Female-Headed
Households
Source: City of Stockton and ACS 2015-2019
54.4 percent of above moderate-income unit capacity,
39.1 percent of moderate-income unit capacity, and
44.6 percent of lower-income unit capacity is identified in tracts with 20.0 to 39.9 percent of children living in female-headed households, generally encompassing
the central portions of the city between I-5 and the San Joaquin Sacramento Subdivision Rail Line north of the
Calaveras River, East Stockton and the southern portion of the Weston Ranch/Van Buskirk neighborhood. Eight
of these tracts are identified by HUD as R/ECAPS, and
the majority are designated Areas of High Segregation
and Poverty. Identification of lower-income sites
increases the opportunities for female-headed
households experiencing overpayment and/or
overcrowding to acquire affordable, and adequately
sized housing while promoting a reduction in the
concentration of female headed households in parts of
the city with higher rates of children in female-headed households.
While a large proportion of unit capacity is identified in sites corresponding to this high proportion of children in single female-headed households, the majority of the
site capacity for above moderate-income units is
33.1%
32.0%
43.0%
39.0%
44.6%
39.1%
54.4%
49.8%
22.3%
28.4%
2.6%
11.1%
0.5%
0.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
19.9% or Fewer 20.0% to 39.9%
40.0% to 59.9% 60.0% of Children or More
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1203
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-147
identified in the Trinity/Northwest Stockton
neighborhood which currently is primarily vacant land
with little existing residential development and a large commercial center, designated as high and highest
resource. The identification of 8.7 percent of moderateand 79.2 percent of above moderate-income unit capacity in these areas increases mobility opportunities for moderate and higher-income single female-headed
households from within and outside of the city to find
appropriate units, while decreasing competition for
housing within other neighborhoods in the city.
The remaining 22.3 percent of lower-income unit
capacity and 2.6 percent of above-moderate unit
capacity, along with 28.4 percent of moderate-income
unit capacity is located within tracts in which 40.0 to
59.9 percent of children reside in single female headedhouseholds. These tracts are located in Downtown, South Stockton and Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village
neighborhoods, and one tract in Upper Hammer
Lane/Thornton Road neighborhood. Of the seven tracts
falling within this high rate of children in single femaleheaded households, four are R/ECAPs and three designated Area of High Segregation and Poverty, while
two are adjacent to San Joaquin Delta College and the
concentration of commercial and services located in the vicinity. Sites identified in these areas provide housing mobility for lower- and moderate-income female
headed households, and the moderate-income unit
capacity facilitates income integration in the areas with high rates of poverty.
By adding moderate and above-moderate units
throughout the city, and particularly by locating lowerincome units within higher income areas to provide access to existing and new amenities and resources,
Stockton will become more accessible to femaleheaded households with children and no spouse or partner present, as well as other single-parent
households.
POTENTIAL EFFECT ON
ACCESS TO
OPPORTUNITY
MOBILITY
As previously discussed, 50.1 percent of households in
Stockton are renters. The rental vacancy rate is 4.9
percent, while the ownership unit vacancy rate is 0.9
percent. The very low ownership unit vacancy rate
indicates a shortage of for-sale homes available in
Stockton. Although the proportion of owner households
(49.9 percent) and renter households (50.1 percent) is
fairly comparable based on a citywide average, the
distribution of households by tenure varies widely within the different neighborhoods throughout the city. There
are 15 census tracts in the city where renters comprise over 60.0 percent of households. Seven of these tracts
in which over 60.0 percent of households are renters
are located primarily in the greater Downtown, South
and East Stockton, the West Lane commercial corridor
in the Upper Hammer/Thornton Road and
Morada/Holman neighborhoods, and the eastern
portion of the Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village
neighborhood. According to 2016-2020 ACS data,
Black and Hispanic households have higher rates of
renter-occupancy than Asian and White non-Hispanic
households. Within the majority of these census tracts, between 5.0 to 15.0 percent of the renters utilize
Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV). There are an
additional two tracts, both R/ECAPS and High
Segregation and Poverty designations in the Upper
Hammer Lane/Thornton Road and Pacific Avenue/
Lincoln Village neighborhoods in the vicinity of the West Lane commercial corridor where the HCV utilization rate exceeds 20.0 percent of renter households.
Approximately 79.2 percent of the total abovemoderate-income unit capacity is identified in the Trinity/Northwest Stockton neighborhood which has a
current rental rate of 70.8 percent, yet a low rate of HCV usage, providing housing mobility opportunities for
higher income renter households. To supply additional
housing mobility opportunities for lower-income renter
households that do not currently hold HCVs in areas
with rates of renter occupancy above 60.0 percent,
lower income unit capacity is identified in Downtown
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1204
BR-148 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
(10.8 percent), South Stockton (23.8 percent), East
Stockton (4.4 percent), Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village
(3.4 percent), Morada/Holman (11.5 percent), and
Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton Road (3.0 percent)
neighborhoods, as well as in areas in Midtown, Weston
Ranch/Van Buskirk, and Industrial Annex
neighborhoods for additional housing mobility
opportunities which may reduce high concentrations of
renters in other parts of the city.
Moderate-income and above moderate-income unit
capacity identified in these high renter occupancy tracts fosters income-integration, particularly in the tracts with highest representation of renter households in
Downtown, South and East Stockton and
Morada/Holman neighborhoods, and will increase
housing mobility opportunities primarily for moderateincome households.
Sites to meet the lower-income RHNA are also identified throughout the city in areas where they will provide
housing mobility opportunities in higher income
neighborhoods which also helps reduce existing
concentrations of lower-income households and
populations of color; as well as within lower-income
sections of the city, including R/ECAPs and Areas of
High Segregation and Poverty, to provide housing
mobility opportunities that deter potential displacement of existing residents at risk of losing their housing and assist in reducing high renter overpayment rates with or without HCV assistance. Many of the lower-income units
are co-located in proximity to moderate-income unit
capacity to facilitate income integrated neighborhoods
and support the development of improved resource and
economic mobility opportunities, which affirmatively
furthers fair housing.
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
As discussed in this assessment, 34.4 percent of
residents are employed within the city. Central Stockton and portions of Midtown have the closest proximity to
jobs; however, previous analysis suggests that while
there are many job opportunities in these tracts, the
resident population in these neighborhoods is not filling them. Scores in the northern portion of the city indicate furthest proximity to jobs, although these same areas
reflect the highest market participation index scores and most positive anticipated educational and economic
outcomes, and therefore it is likely a portion of residents in these neighborhoods have the greatest commuting
accessibility to employment opportunities outside of the city and the San Francisco Bay Area. The combination
of employment factors in Stockton indicates that the jobs in the city may not meet the needs of residents, based
on those commuting out of the city, market
engagement, and the jobs-household ratio.
As shown in Figure HE-30, Percent Unit Capacity by
Jobs Proximity Index Score, the City has identified the greatest capacity (67.9 percent of the unit capacity) for lower-, moderate-, and above moderate-income units
(27.2, 24.5 and 94.4 percent of their total capacities, respectively) in areas which have a score below the 40th percentile relating to limited proximity to jobs within the city, which generally includes the portion of the city west of I-5 north of Benjamin Holt Drive; and east of I-5,
north of Benjamin Holt Drive to Alexandria Place, north of West Lincoln Road between Alexandria Place and
Pacific Avenue, and north of West Hammer Road
between Pacific Avenue to the San Joaquin Valley
Railroad Sacramento Subdivision line. Although a large
portion of the total unit capacity falls within the lower percentile range, the majority of this unit capacity is within above moderate- and moderate-income sites with
the highest labor force engagement rates.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1205
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-149
Figure HE-30: Percent Unit Capacity by
Jobs Proximity Index Score
Source: City of Stockton and HUD 2014-2017
Almost 25.0 percent of the unit capacity in the sites
inventory is met in tracts with jobs proximity scores above the 60th percentile, generally encompassing the Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village, Brookside/Country Club,
Midtown, Downtown, East Stockton, and Port and
Mount Diablo Waterfront neighborhoods, as well as
portions of South Stockton. The high proportion of
lower-income (49.7 percent) and moderate-income
(58.9 percent) unit capacity in the tracts with the highest jobs proximity index supports direct access to
professional, government, service and commercial,
industrial, airport related, and shipping and distribution employment opportunities, as well as access to
employment opportunities in adjacent French Camp,
Tracy and Modesto to the south, Lodi and Sacramento
to the north via I-5, and Contra Costa County and the
Bay Area to the west. This may help lower- and
moderate-income households to limit their combined
housing and transportation costs associated with
traveling to work. This distribution also provides higherincome residents and residents currently commuting out of town for their jobs access to higher income housing
units to support employment opportunities in the city that were not available previously.
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
According to the DOE, most Stockton schools are below
the state educational standards for ELA and
mathematics at each grade level, with performance
generally correlating to income. Anticipated
educational outcomes, (Figure HE-14, Local
TCAC/HCD Educational Outcome Percentile Scores),
are lowest in the southern portion of the city and in
central Stockton between West Lane and Pacific Avenue
correlating to concentrations of deed restricted
multifamily housing stock; and are higher along the
western, northern and northeastern perimeter of the city, correlating to TCAC/HCD Resource designations.
Figure HE-31: TCAC/HCD Educational
Domain Scores
Source: City of Stockton and TCAC/HCD 2021
As shown in Figure HE-31, TCAC/HCD Educational
Domain Scores, the existing patterns of access to
opportunity related to educational resources indicate
that 24.5 percent of the city’s RHNA capacity falls within the least positive educational outcome percentiles
below the 50th percentile, 39.7 percent falls between
the 50th and 75th percentile, and 35.8 percent in the
highest percentile, correlating to median income and
TCAC/HCD higher resource designations.
While 66.3 percent of the lower-income unit capacity is identified on sites with less positive educational
outcomes, the identification of 52.9 percent of
1.8%
15.7%
94.4%
60.5%
25.4%
8.8%
7.4%
23.1%
16.6%
0.8%
8.5%
11.4%
13.7%
0.2%
4.9%
38.3%
45.2%
4.5%
18.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
<20 20 to 39 40 to 59 60 to 79 80 to 99
58.7%
42.6%
0.9%
21.0%
7.6%
10.3%
0.2%
3.5%
16.9%
17.0%
54.2%
39.7%
16.8%
30.1%
44.7%
35.8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
< 25th Percentile 25th to 49th Percentile
50th to 74th Percentile > 75th Percentile
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1206
BR-150 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
moderate-income unit capacity within these
neighborhoods promotes the development of higherincome housing units in lower performing neighborhoods. Integration of income levels increases
potential for increased educational domain scores and
resource designations. The identification of 33.7
percent of lower-income unit capacity in higher scoring areas promotes housing mobility with access to
educational opportunities with higher attainment scores generally associated with higher income, higher
resource areas. Identification of 47.1 percent of
moderate and 98.9 percent of above moderate-income
unit capacity in tracts with scores above the 50th
percentile will provide housing mobility opportunities
with more positive anticipated educational outcomes.
RHNA capacity has been identified in areas that
facilitate housing mobility opportunities for lowerincome households, and also so that all schools can benefit from increased diversity and income-integration to raise educational outcomes.
Over half of the total RHNA inventory unit capacity,
60.3 percent, are located within the Lodi Unified School District catchment area, including 92.2 percent of the
above moderate-income unit capacity, 15.9 percent of
moderate income unit capacity, and 2.0 percent of
lower income unit capacity. An additional 31.4 percent
of units are located within the Stockton Unified School District, including 7.7 percent of above moderateincome unit capacity, 77.4 percent of moderate-income unit capacity, and 66.7 percent of lower-income unit
capacity. A significant percentage of lower-income unit capacity, 26.9 percent, is also located within the
Manteca Unified School District, as is 5.3 percent of
moderate income unit capacity. The remaining 1.3
percent of unit capacity is located within the Lincoln
Unified School District catchment area, including 4.4
percent of lower-income unit capacity, 1.4 percent of
moderate-income unit capacity, and 0.1 percent of
above moderate income unit capacity.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
As shown in Figure HE-15, CalEnviroScreen Percentiles,
most of the city north of the Calaveras River, with the exception of two census tracts scores below the 75th
percentile; while south of the Calaveras River the
majority of tracts score above the 75th percentile, with the exception of the tract encompassing University of the Pacific and the adjacent tract to the west. Tracts with scores above the 75th percentile qualify as a
disadvantaged community, impacting access to
opportunity as it relates to healthy living conditions.
Aside from environmental pollution factors including
exposure to particulate matter and ozone from
industrial, shipping and railroad yard operations, a
concentration of other factors, including lower incomes, poverty rates between 10.0 to 20.0 percent of the
households, concentrations of single female-headed
households with children, high rates of non-White
populations, low rates of educational attainment, and a high rate of unemployment as well as older homes
conditions and lead in housing may contribute to the
least positive environmental scores. While these factors may not reflect all neighborhoods in this percentile
range, they do represent an area of potential concern
regarding fair housing and disproportionate exposure to environmental hazards and a concentration of
vulnerable populations, which is mitigated by Programs
6, 12, 14, 15, 17, 26, 27, and 30.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1207
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-151
Figure HE-32: Percent of Unit Capacity
by CalEnviroScreen Scores
Source: City of Stockton and California OEHHA 2021
As shown in Figure HE-32, Percent of Unit Capacity by
CalEnviroScreen Scores, approximately 51.2 percent of
the RHNA capacity is identified in the tracts scoring
below the 50th percentile. Approximately 11.9 percent
of moderate-income unit capacity, and 2.0 percent of
lower-income unit capacity is identified in the tracts with the lowest scores; while 80.0 percent of above
moderate-income capacity is identified in the tracts with the lowest scores in the Trinity/Northwest Stockton and Eight Mile/Bear Creek neighborhood, which scores in
the 50th to 74th percentile, most likely associated with adjacency to agricultural activities. The majority of
lower-income (80.7 percent) and moderate-income
(76.4 percent) unit capacity is identified in areas that are considered disadvantaged communities, the moderateincome unit capacity will contribute to income integrated neighborhoods and reduction in the
concentration of lower-income households with
associated indicators of disadvantaged communities in
these tracts, while the lower-income unit capacity
provides housing mobility opportunities for households
within their existing neighborhoods to reduce
displacement potential and homelessness. As well,
although relatively small, the proportion of lower-and
moderate-income unit capacity in non-disadvantaged
neighborhoods of the city contributes to reduction of
concentrations of lower-income households in the most
environmentally impacted areas of the city.
Potential Effect on Displacement Risk
Overcrowding
Overall, 9.3 percent of households in Stockton are
considered overcrowded. Overcrowding is seen more
amongst those that are renting, whereas 12.4 percent
of renters are overcrowded, 6.0 percent of homeowners
experience overcrowding. Overall, households
experiencing overcrowding in Stockton, when combined
with income or accessibility challenges, may become at
risk for displacement. Higher overcrowding rates are
concentrated along the West Lane commercial corridor,
Downtown, in the South and East Stockton
neighborhoods, and Industrial Annex neighborhood,
generally correlating to the city’s lowest-income
neighborhoods, R/ECAPs and TCAC/HCD Areas of
High Segregation and Poverty. These are areas where
older housing stock, originally constructed to serve the shipping industry, is mixed with industrial and other
nonresidential uses, as well as the location of deed
restricted housing stock, particularly in the Downtown
and West Lane commercial corridor.
2.0%
11.9%
80.0%
51.2%
17.2%
11.7%
14.8%
14.9%
80.7%
76.4%
5.1%
33.8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
25th to 49th Percentile 50th to 74th Percentile
> 75th Percentile
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1208
BR-152 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Figure HE-33: Percent Unit Capacity by
Rate of Overcrowded Households
Source: City of Stockton and California HHS; Esri 2022
As shown in Figure HE-33, Percent Unit Capacity by
Rate of Overcrowded Households, the city has identified
68.8 percent of unit capacity in tracts with the lowest rates of overcrowding, and 12.2 percent in tracts with
rates between 8.3 and 11.9 percent of households
experiencing overcrowding. An estimated 27.3 percent
of the lower-income unit capacity, 29.4 percent of the
moderate-income unit capacity, and 94.6 percent of the
above moderate-income unit capacity is identified in
tracts with rates of overcrowding below 8.2 percent, (the statewide average) providing housing mobility
opportunities for households of all incomes
experiencing overcrowding in other areas of the city.
While 12.2 percent of the RHNA capacity is identified in tracts with overcrowding rates between 8.3 and 12.0
percent, 27.3 percent of the low-income RHNA unit
capacity and 29.4 percent of moderate-income unit
capacity is identified in the tracts south of March Lane between I-5 and Pacific Avenue, in the Stonewood
Estates RCAA, within eastern Midtown, the Port and
Mount Diablo Waterfront neighborhood, the northern
tract in the Weston Ranch/Van Buskirk neighborhood,
and one tract in South Stockton which is primarily
industrial and rail yard uses, providing housing mobility opportunities for residents in units which may be both
affordable and of adequate size to meet the needs of
lower- and moderate-income households while
facilitating potential to reduce concentrations of
overcrowding in other parts of the city.
Approximately 12.2 percent of the unit capacity is
located in tracts with overcrowding above 15.1 percent
of households. 24.8 percent of lower-income unit
capacity and 38.9 percent of moderate-income unit
capacity is identified on sites in these areas of higher overcrowding which generally correspond to R/ECAPs
and TCAC/HCD designations of Area of High
Segregation and Poverty, as well as a concentration of
deed restricted housing stock. One pipeline project
includes 0.8 percent of the above moderate-income unit
capacity in this area, initiating income integration into the South Stockton neighborhood. which helps relieve
pressure on the existing inventory of housing units in that area to meet needs of residents experiencing
overcrowding while remaining in their own familiar
neighborhood. Overall, the unit potential identified in the sites inventory will help to facilitate additional
housing mobility opportunities for a range of sizes and locations for those households that are currently
experiencing overcrowding.
OVERPAYMENT
In Stockton, 20.8 percent of the households are cost
burdened and 21.0 percent are severely cost burdened,
for a total of 41.8 percent of the households
experiencing some level of overpayment. Approximately
27.9 percent of all homeowners are overpaying for
housing; in contrast, 54.4 percent of all renters are cost burdened, and, in most circumstances, overpayment is
closely tied to income, and in many cases, but not
consistently, proportion of populations of color, with
lower-income renters experiencing the highest incidence of overpayment and most at risk of displacement.
Additionally, previous analysis has identified that
special-needs populations, including female-headed
households, large families, persons with disabilities and seniors, often fall into the lower-income category and
may be particularly at risk of displacement when
housing opportunities at affordable costs, sizes, or
access to resources are not available.
27.3%
29.4%
94.6%
68.8%
32.4%
18.3%
2.8%
12.2%
15.5%
13.4%
1.8%
6.8%
5.7%
11.3%
0.8%
3.5%
19.1%
27.6%
8.7%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
< 8.2% of Households
8.3% to 12.0% of Households
12.1 to 15.0% of Households
15.1 to 20.0% of Households
Above 20.0% of Households
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1209
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-153
According to the 2015-2019 ACS, most of the city
reflects renter cost burdened rates between 40.0 to 59.9 percent (Figure 18, Renter Overpayment in Stockton).
The areas with rates at 60.0 percent or above are found in neighborhoods along the West Lane commercial
corridor, along March Lane and two tracts in the Pacific Avenue/Lincoln Village neighborhood, in the greater
Downtown area, and tracts within South and East
Stockton neighborhoods.
As shown in Figure HE-34, Percent Unit Capacity by
Renter Overpayment, and Figure HE-35, Unit Capacity
by Homeowner Overpayment, 25.8 percent of the city’s
RHNA capacity is identified in tracts with a renter
overpayment rate over 60.0 percent; 47.2 percent of
the RHNA capacity is in tracts with has renter
overpayment rates between 40.0 to 59.9 percent. The
remaining 27.0 percent includes rates of renter
overpayment between 20.0 to 39.0 percent. The
majority of lower-income RHNA units (58.0 percent)
have been identified on sites in areas in which
approximately 60.0 percent and above of renters are
overpaying for housing. The majority of the remaining
lower-income unit capacity (41.7 percent) is identified on sites where between 40.0 and 59.9 percent of
renters overpay for housing, , primarily in the central portion of the city north of the Calaveras River, in the Midtown, Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton Road, and
Weston Ranch/Van Buskirk neighborhoods. Additional
affordable rental resources in these areas will facilitate housing mobility opportunities for renters currently
overpaying and at risk of displacement, whereas the
identification of sites to accommodate the lower-income units in locales with lower overpayment rates contributes toward reducing concentrations of renter overpayment
in areas of more concentrated overpayment by
providing housing mobility opportunities, and fostering income-integration into neighborhoods that have more
positive economic conditions. An additional 0.3 percent of lower-income units were identified in areas where
between 20.0 to 39.9 percent of renters overpay for
housing.
Figure HE-34: Percent Unit Capacity by
Renter Overpayment
Source: City of Stockton and ACS 2015-2019
As well, 61.0 percent of moderate-income unit capacity
and 4.7 percent of above moderate-income projects
are within the tracts with the highest rates of renter
overpayment, which promotes income-integrated
neighborhoods and reduces the concentration of
severely cost burdened households overpaying for
housing. Overall, an increase in the supply of lowerand moderate-income housing throughout the city, particularly those in proximity to commercial uses and
services, will help to alleviate conditions that contribute to overpayment by reducing the gap between supply
and demand for this type of housing.
0.3%
7.5%
42.2%
27.0%
41.7%
31.5%
53.1%
47.2%
58.0%
61.0%
4.7%
25.8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
20.0% to 39.9% 40.0% to 59.9% 60.0% to 79.9%
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1210
BR-154 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Figure HE-35: Percent of Unit Capacity
by Homeowner Overpayment
Source: City of Stockton and ACS 2015-2019
While homeowners generally experience cost burden at
a lesser rate than renters, in Stockton the range of rates of overpayment is broader than that of renters, with
some sites located in areas where only 12.3 percent of
owners overpay for housing, and others located in tract
1.00 where all owner households experience cost
burden. The highest rates of homeowner overpayment
occur in the Downtown, portions of East and South
Stockton, and southeast of Weberstown Mall, which are
designated by TCAC/HCD as an Area of High
Segregation and Poverty and most are R/ECAPS, where
over 60.0 percent of homeowners are cost burdened
(Figure HE-19, Homeowner Overpayment in Stockton).
As shown on Figure HE-35, Percent of Unit Capacity by
Homeowner Overpayment, 8.4 percent of the
distribution of RHNA units is identified in these areas to increase ownership housing supply, with 20.1 percent
of lower-income, and 24.0 percent of moderate-income
unit capacity identified to potentially reduce
displacement risk and overcrowding for these
households as more units become available, and
facilitating housing mobility opportunities throughout
these areas near services and resources in commercial
areas, easing pressure on the housing stock.
Conversely, 73.0 percent of site distribution is within sites in areas in which less than 39.0 percent of
homeowners are cost burdened, including 96.5 percent
of above moderate-income, 31.6 percent of lowerincome, and 43.3 percent of moderate-income unit capacity; which includes the following neighborhoods:
Trinity/Northwest Stockton, Eight Mile/Bear Creek,
Upper Hammer Lane/Thornton Rd. west of Lower
Sacramento Road, Brookside/Country Club, northern
and eastern Morada/Holman, Pacific Ave/Lincoln
Village, Midtown and portions of Weston Ranch/Van
Buskirk.
Approximately 18.6 percent of the unit distribution is
identified where 40.0 to 59.9 percent of homeowners
overpay with 48.3 percent of lower-income unit capacity and 32.7 percent of moderate-income unit capacity
identified on sites north of the Calaveras River along the West Lane, Pacific Avenue and March Lane commercial
corridors within the Pacific Venue/Lincoln Village,
Morada/Holman and southern portion of Upper
Hammer Lane/Thornton Road neighborhoods. The
identification of 3.5 percent of above moderate-income
unit capacity in the South Stockton and Pacific
Avenue/Lincoln Village neighborhoods with rates of
overpayment above 40.0 percent but below 59.9
percent, predominantly within the Mobile Homes on El
Dorado pipeline residential project in South Stockton
will foster income integration in the southern portion of the city and provide alternatives to the typical single family detached housing unit.
The addition of these units will help to alleviate existing overpayment by offering lower- and moderate-income
units to current and future residents where there is need and increasing the housing stock overall to alleviate the demand on an existing shortage of housing at
affordable price points. Additionally, the site capacity and distribution of units by income category will
facilitate mobility opportunities for all households.
1.0%
4.7%
51.5%
32.5%
30.6%
38.6%
44.9%
40.5%
48.3%
32.7%
3.5%
18.6%
3.2%
9.5%
2.2%
16.9%
14.4%
6.2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Lower Income Capacity
Moderate Income Capacity
Above Moderate Income
Capacity
Total RHNA Capacity
10.0% to 19.9% 20.0% to 39.9% 40.0% to 59.9%
60.0% to 79.9% 80.0% to 100%
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1211
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-155
CONTRIBUTING
FACTORS
In discussions with stakeholders and fair housing
advocates and through this assessment of fair housing
issues, the City identified factors that contribute to fair housing issues, as shown in Table HE-49. While a
variety of strategies are identified in this element to address the fair housing issues, the most pressing issues are listed below. The fair housing indicators analyzed
earlier in this chapter that led to identification of the fair housing issues are shown in bold in parentheses after
each issue. The sub-categories analyzed under each
indicator are also listed after the bolded indicator.
• The concentrations of R/ECAPS and limited
income-integration at the local neighborhood
level, (Integration and Segregation – TCAC/HCD
Opportunity, Income, Lower Income
Neighborhoods and Poverty, Race/Ethnicity,
R/ECAPs and RCAAs; Other Relevant Factors -
History of Development Trends, Land Use and
Zoning; Sites Inventory Analysis – Tract Analysis,
Potential Effect on Integration and Segregation)
• Displacement risk due to rising housing costs,
(Integration and Segregation – Income, Lower
Income Neighborhoods and Poverty; Access to
Opportunity – Housing Mobility, and Employment
Opportunities; Disproportionate Housing Need
and Displacement Risk – Overcrowding,
Overpayment, Housing Condition, Displacement
Risk; Other Relevant Factors – History of
Development Trends; Enforcement and Outreach
Capacity – Compliance with Fair Housing Laws,
Fair Housing Complaints);
• Homelessness, (Chapter 2 – Housing Needs
Assessment, Disproportionate Housing Need and
Displacement Risk – Overcrowding,
Overpayment, Housing Condition, Displacement
Risk; Housing Mobility, Enforcement and
Outreach Capacity – Compliance with Fair
Housing Laws, Fair Housing Complaints)
• Disproportionate access to resources for lowerincome, households with special needs, and populations of color, (Integration and Segregation
– TCAC/HCD Opportunity, Income, Lower
Income Neighborhoods and Poverty,
Race/Ethnicity, Familial Status, Persons with
Disability, Access to Opportunity – Transit
Mobility, Housing Mobility, Education;
Employment Opportunities); and
• Barriers to homeownership, (Integration and
Segregation - Income, Lower Income
Neighborhoods and Poverty, Race/Ethnicity;
Disproportionate Housing Need and
Displacement Risk – Overcrowding,
Overpayment, Housing Condition; Other Relevant
Factors - History of Development Trends, Land Use
and Zoning; Enforcement and Outreach Capacity
– Compliance with Fair Housing Laws, Fair
Housing Complaints).
Prioritized contributing factors are bolded in Table HE49, and associated actions to meaningfully and affirmatively further fair housing related to these factors are bold and italicized.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1212
BR-156 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Table HE-49: Factors that Contribute to Fair Housing Issues 2023
AFH IDENTIFIED
ISSUES CONTRIBUTING FACTORS MEANINGFUL ACTIONS
Presence of
concentrated R/ECAPs
in Greater Downtown,
South Stockton, East
Stockton, and between
West Lane and Pacific
Avenue in Northern
Stockton
Concentrations of poverty and lower-income households.
Shortage of affordable housing options in Moderate and High resource areas and higher-income unit capacity in lowerincome and lower resource areas to foster income integration and stimulate place-based revitalization and improved access to resources.
Concentration of renter-occupied households in Low resource areas.
Highest share of minority residents compared to county and megaregion.
High rate of HCV holders and lack of acceptance of HCVs in Moderate and High resource areas
Older housing stock and areas with poor housing conditions resulting in lower housing costs in South Stockton, Downtown and East Stockton, and scattered residential areas along major commercial corridors north of Midtown.
High rates of diversity concentrated in Greater Downtown, South Stockton and East Stockton due to historical practices Maintain a list of vacant residential land appropriate for affordable housing in the city, including sites in moderate and high resource areas (Program 1).
Encourage construction of Accessory Dwelling Units targeting areas of higher resource opportunity (Program 6).
Encourage the construction of affordable units with three or more bedrooms and incentivize on-site childcare and support services in mixed use and multifamily developments (Program 30).
Produce affordable rental housing in opportunity-rich locations near transit, services, and key amenities (Programs 5,8,12).
Development Code revisions to address zoning to facilitate housing types serving lowerincome households (Program 17).
Implement multilingual communication and outreach strategies (Program 30).
Provide mortgage assistance for low- and moderate-income first-time homebuyers, prioritizing advertising to persons in higher opportunity areas (Program 12).
Encourage landlords and property managers in high resource areas to advertise their units to Section 8 voucher holders (Program 11).
Provide education to landlords and property managers on fair housing rights and requirements/discrimination (Program 30).
Barriers to
homeownership,
particularly for
communities of color
Historical redlining and barriers to building generational wealth.
Shortage of affordable homeownership opportunities,
particularly for smaller, entry-level households.
Household income growth that has not kept pace with housing costs.
Outside demand for housing from relocating Bay Area
residents with higher-paying jobs.
Conversion of older single-family housing stock to rental properties.
Offering programs to remove racially restrictive covenants on city and private property (Program 32)
Continue to operate program for downpayment assistance for first-time homebuyers (12)
Encourage construction of Accessory Dwelling Units targeting areas of higher resource opportunity (Program 6).
Development Code revisions to address zoning to facilitate housing types serving lowerincome households (Program 17).
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1213
ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING BR-157
AFH IDENTIFIED
ISSUES CONTRIBUTING FACTORS MEANINGFUL ACTIONS
Displacement risk due
to economic pressures,
particularly for lowerincome households
Rising housing costs outpacing wage increases.
Cost of repairs and rehabilitation.
Lack of affordable multifamily rental housing at appropriate sizes, resulting in overcrowding or overpayment when renters are pushed into single-family home rental market.
Low rental vacancy rates.
Outside demand for housing from relocating Bay Area
residents with higher-paying jobs intensifies gentrification and competition for housing resources.
Loss of naturally occurring affordable housing resources.
Continue to develop infill projects and address brownfield remediation in the Downtown and Greater Downtown (Program 7).
Encourage landlords and property managers in high resource areas to advertise their units to Section 8 voucher holders (Program 11).
Encourage construction of Accessory Dwelling Units targeting areas of higher resource opportunity (Program 6).
Provide exemptions from fees for certain projects to prevent added costs for new units (Program 18).
Preserve existing subsidized affordable units at-risk for conversion to market-rate (Program 21).
Continue to operate the housing rehabilitation programs and improve communication about the program to eligible owners of mobile homes and rental properties (Program 22).
Continue code enforcement in targeted areas (Program 23).
Comply with State law regarding replacement of existing affordable units (Program 24).
Encourage the construction of affordable units with three or more bedrooms and incentivize on-site childcare and support services in mixed use and multifamily developments (Program 30).
Assist the development of affordable housing using State and federal funds (Program 12).
Provide support for low-income renters, including multilingual tenant counseling, rental assistance, financial counseling, crisis stabilization services, and legal support (Program 30).
Provide programs for property owners to finance the purchase and installation of infrastructure improvements to their properties (Program 14).
Provide voluntary energy assessments for housing units built prior to November 1, 2002 (Program 15).
Provide weatherization services (Program 16).
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1214
BR-158 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
AFH IDENTIFIED
ISSUES CONTRIBUTING FACTORS MEANINGFUL ACTIONS
Disproportionately
limited access to
resources for lowerincome and
communities of color
households
Discriminatory lending and other barriers to home ownership for non-White populations, including language barriers and documentation requirements.
Concentration of renters, lower-income households, and nonWhite residents near high-intensity commercial and industrial uses, circulation, and rail corridors in Downtown, South Stockton, East Stockton, and residential areas in central Stockton.
Concentration of assisted affordable housing resources in Low resource tracts, Areas of High Segregation and Poverty, and R/ECAPS.
Continue to repair and replace public facilities in lower-income neighborhoods (Program 4).
Continue to develop infill projects and address brownfield remediation in the Downtown and Greater Downtown (Program 7).
Implement multilingual communication and outreach strategies (Program 30).
Offering programs to remove racially restrictive covenants on city and private property (Program 32).
Address environmental impacts and increase amenities in areas with concentrations of renters, lower-income households, and non-White residents (Program 31).
Produce affordable rental housing in opportunity-rich locations near transit, services, and key amenities (Programs 5,8,12).
Explore additional community benefit options that could be included in the criteria for initiating modified and new Development Agreements (Program 19).
Disperse Sites Suitable for Lower Income Housing to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (Program 33)
Homeless individuals
and families
High rates of unsheltered individuals.
Increasing proportion of employed homeless face challenges in securing housing.
Continue to support organizations assisting homeless persons (Program 25).
Encourage landlords and property managers in high resource areas to advertise their units to Section 8 voucher holders (Program 11).
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1215
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-159
HOUSING SITES
INVENTORY 4
INTRODUCTION
California law (Government Code Section 65583
(a)(3)) requires that the Housing Element contain an
inventory of land suitable for residential development, including vacant sites that can be developed for housing within the planning period and nonvacant (i.e.,
underutilized) sites with potential for redevelopment.
State law also requires an analysis of the relationship of zoning, potential environmental hazards, and
infrastructure available to these sites.
REGIONAL HOUSING
NEEDS ALLOCATION
The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) is the
State of California–required process that seeks to ensure cities and counties are planning for enough housing to
accommodate all economic segments of the
community. The process is split into the following three steps.
1. Regional Determination. The California Department
of Housing and Community Development (HCD)
provides each region with a regional determination
of housing need, which includes a total number of
units split into four income categories—above
moderate, moderate, low, and very low income.
The City of Stockton is within the region covered by
the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG).
The 6th cycle RHNA for San Joaquin County as a
whole is 52,719. This is the total number of units
that the jurisdictions of SJCOG must collectively
plan to accommodate in the unincorporated county
and the cities of Escalon, Lathrop, Lodi, Manteca,
Ripon, Tracy, and Stockton.
2. RHNA Methodology. Councils of Governments
(COG), including SJCOG, are responsible for
developing a RHNA methodology for allocating the
regional determination to each city and county in
the COG’s region. This methodology must further
specific state objectives, including but not limited to promoting infill, equity, and environmental
protection; ensuring jobs-housing balance; and
affirmatively furthering fair housing. SJCOG
developed a methodology to suballocate the
county-level projection to the unincorporated
county and the cities of Escalon, Lathrop, Lodi,
Manteca, Ripon, Tracy, and Stockton. Of the total
52,719 units in the SJCOG region, 12,673 are
allocated to the City of Stockton. SJCOG’s
methodology and unit allocations were approved by
HCD in 2022.
3. Housing Element Updates. Each city and county
must then adopt a housing element that
demonstrates how the jurisdiction can
accommodate its assigned RHNA through its
zoning. HCD reviews each jurisdiction’s housing
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1216
BR-160 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
element for compliance with state law. This Housing
Element covers the 6th cycle planning period, which
is from December 31, 2023, through December
31, 2031. HCD directs local agencies to calculate
the projected housing need for extremely lowincome households by applying one of two methodologies to the RHNA for very low-income
households: 1) use available U.S. census data to
calculate the percentage/number of very lowincome households that qualify as extremely lowincome households; or 2), as used herein, presume that 50.0 percent of very low-income households
qualify as extremely low-income households. As
shown in Table HE-50, the City’s total RHNA for
2023 to 2031 is 12,673 units. Of these units, the
City must plan to accommodate 2,465 units for very
low-income households, of which 50.0 percent are
assumed to be affordable to extremely low-income
households (<30.0 percent of median income),
1,548 units for low-income households, 2,572
units for moderate-income households, and 6,088
units for above moderate-income households.
Table HE-50: Stockton’s 2023-2031 RHNA by Income Category
INCOME CATEGORY RHNA UNITS RHNA PERCENTAGE
Very Low Income*
(<50% of Median Income) 2,465 19.5%
Low Income
(50-79% of Median Income) 1,548 12.2%
Moderate Income
(80-120% of Median Income) 2,572 20.3%
Above Moderate Income
(>120% of Median Income) 6,088 48.0%
Total 12,673 100%
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development; San Joaquin County Subregion 6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation, Final Methodology.
*It is assumed that 50 percent of very low-income units will be for extremely low-income households.
AVAILABILITY OF LAND
State housing element law emphasizes the importance
of adequate land for housing and requires that each
housing element “… identify adequate sites … to
facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of housing types for all income levels…” (California
Government Code Section 65583(c)(1)). To allow for
an adequate supply of new housing, land must be zoned
at a variety of densities to ensure that development is feasible for a wide range of income levels. The identified land must also have access to appropriate services and
infrastructure, such as water, wastewater, and roads.
To demonstrate the City’s capacity to meet its RHNA, an adequate sites inventory was conducted. The inventory
must identify adequate sites that will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards
and with public services and facilities needed to
facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of housing types for households of all income levels.
The analysis of the relationship of suitable sites to zoning provides a means for determining the realistic number
of dwelling units that could actually be constructed on those sites in the current planning period. The analysis also identifies the zoning districts the City believes can accommodate its share of the regional housing needs
for all income levels.
The sites in the City’s inventory are currently available.
These sites will allow for the development of a variety of housing types that will meet the needs of all income
groups as per the City’s RHNA for the 2023-2031
planning period.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1217
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY 5-161
SITES SUITABLY ZONED
FOR RESIDENTIAL USES
AT APPROPRIATE
DENSITIES
Housing element law requires jurisdictions to provide a requisite analysis showing that zones identified to
accommodate the RHNA at each income level allow
appropriate housing types at appropriate densities
sufficient to encourage development to meet the needs
of all households.
To meet the lower-income RHNA, the law provides two
options for preparing the analysis: 1) describe market
demand and trends, financial feasibility, and recent
development experience; or 2) use default density
standards deemed adequate to meet the appropriate
zoning test (California Government Code Section
65583.2(c)(3)(B)). The default density designated by
HCD for Stockton is 30 units per acre. As demonstrated
herein, the City has a surplus of suitably zoned sites to meet its RHNA.
To meet the moderate- and above moderate-income
RHNA, AB 725 requires the following:
1. At least 25 percent of the units counted towards the City’s moderate-income RHNA are on sites where
at least 4 units per acre but not more than 100 units
per acre are allowed.
2. At least 25 percent of the units counted towards the City’s above moderate-income RHNA are on sites
where at least 4 units per acre are allowed.
As shown in Table A-1 in Appendix A, Stockton’s land
inventory is in compliance with AB 725, because all sites identified to meet the moderate- and above moderateincome RHNA allow more than 4 units per acre and approximately 86 percent of the units counted towards
the City’s moderate-income RHNA are on sites where
fewer than 100 units per acre are allowed.
SITES IDENTIFIED IN
PREVIOUS HOUSING
ELEMENTS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(c), any
nonvacant sites identified in the 5th housing element
cycle or vacant sites identified in two or more
consecutive housing element planning periods shall be
provided by-right development when at least 20 percent
of the units in the proposed development are affordable to lower-income households. Table A-1 in Appendix A
identifies the 80 sites with capacity for the City’s lowerincome RHNA that were also included in both prior cycles. All sites are vacant.
Per Program 3, Sites Included in Previous Housing
Elements, the City will update all required Development Code and General Plan provisions to allow projects that have at least 20 percent affordable units (extremely low, very low, or low) without discretionary review or “by
right.” Multifamily housing (including projects that are 100 percent residential) is already permitted by right in most of the zones where these sites are (CD, CG, CN,
CO and RH). The City will ensure it complies with
Government Code Section 65583.2(c) for all
applicable sites identified in Table A-1 in Appendix A.
REALISTIC CAPACITY
For the pipeline projects summarized in Tables HE-53
and HE-54, the realistic capacity is based on the project design as approved by the City of Stockton or as
submitted by the applicant. (See Table A-2 in Appendix
A for parcel-level data on the pipeline project sites.) Development capacity for vacant and underutilized sites listed in Table HE-53 is based on allowed density and
historical residential and mixed-use development trends in the city, as described herein. (See Table A-1 in
Appendix A for parcel-level data on the vacant and
underutilized sites.)
• For the sites in the RH, RL, RL and RM zones,
the assumed realistic capacity is 80 percent
of the maximum allowed units. This
assumption is supported by recent project
trends on sites with this type of zoning
averaging 88 percent of maximum allowed
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1218
BR-162 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
density or units per acre. Eighty percent is a
slightly more conservative assumption.
• For the sites in the CD, CG, CN, CL, and CO
zones, the assumed realistic capacity is 44.6
percent of the maximum allowed units.
Projects that are 100 percent residential are
permitted in these zones, but the assumed
realistic capacity accounts for the potential
for a mixture of commercial and residential
uses. As shown in Table HE-53, several
residential developments have been built
recently in commercial districts.
In addition, the City reviewed the sites with zoning that allows non-residential uses in the City’s currently
adopted Housing Element (2015-2023) in addition to
other sites with this type of zoning where residential has been built or approved, and compared that with the
current uses on the site. The details about the sites
analyzed are below:
• 339 vacant sites that allow non-residential
uses were in the existing Housing Element
inventory or are developed or approved with
residential units in the city. Most of the sites
from the existing Housing Element have not
developed or been approved for
development.
o 25 of the sites evaluated (some made up
of multiple parcels) have approved or
built projects on them.
▪ 13 of the sites have built or planned
non-residential uses on them.
▪ 12 of the sites have built or planned
residential uses on them:
• Eight are built with all residential
units
• Four are mixed-use and the
percent of the project that is
residential for each one is one at
69% two at 75%, and one at 96%
residential
Based on this analysis, 44.6% of sites that allow
residential are permitted or built with residential uses.
This analysis resulted in the identification of a need to adjust realistic capacity assumptions on this type of site from 50% to 44.6%. Additional analysis of realistic
capacity on sites that allow non-residential uses was
conducted using the following formula: number of
projects/sites in the list of sites referenced above that allow non-residential divided by the total number of
projects approved/built on sites that allow nonresidential (above)multiplied by the built density (% out of 100) of the projects above that included residential.
Below is the formula using the numbers for Stockton:
12/25 X 85% = 41%
Forty-one percent is a bit lower than the 44.6% number
arrived at using the City’s track record. However, the
City is committing to implementing several programs to
support residential or mixed-use development on sites
and in zoning districts that allow non-residential uses.
These include:
• Program 2: Downtown Implementation – As
called for in the Climate Action Plan and
General Plan the City shall continue to
implement measures to enable development
of 4,400 residential units in the Greater
Downtown Area by 2035. This will include
adoption and implementation of the Housing
Action Plan. The majority of Housing Element
sites that allow non-residential uses are
located within the Downtown and Greater
Downtown.
• Program 5: Housing and Neighborhood
Action Plans - The City is currently preparing
a Housing Action Plan (HAP) to provide a
guidebook with information to interested
developers and property owners about
residential opportunities in the city. This plan
includes the 10 top priority sites the City has
identified as “shovel-ready” for housing
development. Eight of the 10 sites are in
zoning districts that allow non-residential
uses. Selection of the priority sites was based
on financial feasibility analysis and policy
goals. The HAP will be marketed and
provided to potential developers upon
completion. Implementation of the HAP will
include marketing and incentivizing
development of missing middle housing types
including tiny homes, cottage homes, singleroom occupancy units, duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes. Incentivizing housing types
such as single-room occupancy units and tiny
homes is expected to create new housing
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1219
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY 5-163
opportunities for extremely low-income
households. The HAP will be completed in
2024.
• Program 7: Infill Strategy - The City shall
continue to implement the Downtown
Infrastructure Infill Incentive Program or
explore other financing strategies to facilitate
the development of infill projects in the
Downtown and Greater Downtown areas.
The Downtown Infrastructure Infill Incentive
Program provides financial incentives to
eligible parties in developing new marketrate residential, commercial, or mixed-use projects in Downtown Stockton. Under the
Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program,
eligible development projects may receive a
reimbursement for certain public
infrastructure improvements based on the
project meeting certain criteria including a
threshold number of residential units or
square footage, being within the qualifying
geographic area, investing at least
$500,000, and needing public infrastructure
improvements of at least $100,000. The
program identifies actions and incentives to
promote infill development, including
brownfield remediation. The majority of
Housing Element sites that allow nonresidential uses are located within the Downtown and Greater Downtown.
• Program 9: Government-Owned Sites - The
City will facilitate housing development on
City-owned sites by issuing RFI/SOQs for
development, complying with the Surplus
Lands Act (SLA), and entering into
Development and Disposition Agreements
with developers. The City will facilitate
housing development on sites owned by the
Stockton Unified School District (SUSD) by
coordinating with SDSU to encourage
housing development. Many of these sites
are in the zoning districts allowing nonresidential uses. • Program 17: Development Code Revisions –
this program calls for updates to the City’s
Development Code. The City is finishing a
comprehensive update to its Development
Code in 2024 and all of the amendments in
Program 17 will be part of that
comprehensive update. There are a number
of amendments included in this program that
will facilitate residential projects in zoning
districts that allow non-residential uses
including expanding the types of residential
uses allowed in these zones, explicitly stating
that 100 percent residential projects are
allowed in these zones, increasing maximum
heights, decreasing required setbacks,
decreasing minimum open space per
multifamily unit, and amending the code to
encourage former industrial areas to
transition to other uses.
These assumed realistic capacities are feasible given
current development standards and on-site
improvement requirements (e.g., setbacks, building
height, parking, density requirements, land use controls, water and wastewater access, and open space
requirements)
Table HE-51 summarizes how the various factors in
housing element statute (Government Code Section
65583.2(c)(2) result in an adjusted average site
capacity of 80 percent of the maximum densities in the
residentially zoned areas of Stockton. Table HE-52
summarizes how the various factors in housing element
statute (Government Code Section 65583.2(c)(2) result
in an adjusted average site capacity of 44.6 percent of the maximum densities in the areas of Stockton where
sites are identified that also allow non-residential uses.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1220
BR-164 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Table HE-51: Capacity Adjustment Factors – Residential Zones
CAPACITY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT REASONING
Land use controls and site improvements 88% For net acreage due to on-site improvements (sidewalks, easements).
Realistic capacity of the site 80% Adjustment based on past redevelopment trends Typical densities 88% Recently approved projects on residentially zoned sites are between 71-95% of maximum capacity
Infrastructure available 85% Most sites have utilities available, development of utility connections needed on some sites
Environmental constraints 95%
Environmental Constraints have minimal impact on whether the sites can be developed. Mitigation for environmental hazards will also limit the impacts of environmental constraints.
Source: City of Stockton, 2024
Table HE-52: Capacity Adjustment Factors – Other Zones
CAPACITY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT REASONING
Land use controls and site improvements 88% For net acreage due to on-site improvements (sidewalks, easements).
Realistic capacity of the site 44.6% Adjustment based on past development trends Typical densities 58%
Recently approved 100% residential projects are between 41-83% of maximum capacity
Infrastructure available 85% Most sites have utilities available, development of utility connections needed on some sites
Environmental Constraints 95%
Environmental Constraints have minimal impact on whether the sites can be developed. Mitigation for environmental hazards will also limit the impacts of environmental constraints.
Source: City of Stockton, 2024
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1221
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-165
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
As shown in Table HE-53, several recent projects support the viability of the sites in the inventory and the assumed realistic capacities.
Table HE-53: Representative Projects
PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING ACREAGE UNITS
MAXIMUM
ALLOWED
DENSITY
DENSITY
(UNITS PER
ACRE)
PERCENT OF
ALLOWED
DENSITY
NOTES
Anchor Village 133 E Oak St
601 N Hunter St 139-060-43 Commercial CD 0.69 50 87 72.5 83% Built in 2018.
Cal Weber 40 Apartments 512 E Weber Ave.
149-170-31
149-170-32
149-170-33
Commercial CD 0.76 40 87 52.6 60%
Built in 2016. Adaptive reuse of existing buildings.
Downtown redevelopment. Mixed use with ground-floor
commercial; 39 units affordable to low- and very low -
income families and one unit for the on-site manager.
LIHTC, City, HOME, HACSJ funding, HCV-PB.*
Crossway Residences 448 South Center Street 149-062-14 Commercial CD 1.12 41 90 36.6 41% Built in 2020 and 2021. Three separate buildings with a total of 41 units. Affordable supportive housing for SJC Behavioral Health. Redevelopment of HACSJ's former
administrative offices. HACSJ funding through the Mental Health Services Act, HCV-PB.*
Eight Mile House Apartments 2829 Breaker Way 070-670-02 HDR RH 13.5 384 30 28.4 95% Under construction.
Grand View Village 228, 240, and 250 N. Hunter Street and 241 N. San Joaquin Street 139-130-28 Commercial CD 0.79 75 136 94.9 70% Under construction. Downtown redevelopment. 100 percent affordable. Grocery store and community spaces. LIHTC,
City, CDBG and HOME funding.*
Liberty Square Apartments 804 N Hunter St 139-055-01 Admin Prof CO 1.76 74 90 42.0 n/a – existing building
Under construction. Adaptive reuse of offices. 100 percent affordable to VLI, City, HUD, AHSC funding*.
Medici Artist Lofts 242 N. Sutter St 139-370-01 Commercial CD 0.33 34 136 103.0 n/a – existing building
Built in 2020. Adaptive reuse of offices. 27 units affordable to low income, 7 market rate. Local artists preference.
LIHTC, City, HOME, HACSJ funding, HCV-PB.*
Morada Crossings (Palms at Morada) 4142 E Morada Ln 124-290-28 124-290-30 HDR RH 10.17 216 30 21.2 71% Built in 2021.
New Apartments 709 N Center St 137-180-30 HDR CN 0.81 36 90 44.4 49% Sierra Vista Phase I and Phase II 1501 Twelfth Street 169-270-03 MDR RM 13.4 215 17.4 16.2 93% Built in 2020. 100 percent affordable. LIHTC, HACSJ funding, HCV-PB.*
Sonora Square (HASJC) 431 S El Dorado St, 14906217 Commercial CD 0.92 37 90 40.2 45% Under construction. Permanent supportive housing. 100
percent affordable to low income, Housing Authority LIHTC, NPLH, CDBG. HACSJ funding, HCV-PB.*
Stonebrier Apartments 4770 West Ln 096-140-71 HDR RH 5.49 156 30 28.4 95% Built in 2020.
Average Percentage of Maximum Allowed
Density – Residentially Zoned Sites 88%
Average Percentage of Maximum Allowed
Density – Non-Residentially Zoned Sites 58%
Source: City of Stockton, 2023.
* AHSC = Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities; CDBG = Community Development Block Grant; HACSJ = Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin; HCV-PB = Housing Choice Voucher, Project Based; LIHTC = Low Income Housing Tax Credit; NPLH = No Place Like Home.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1222
BR-166 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
This page intentionally left blank.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1223
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-167
SUMMARY OF
APPROACH TO MEETING
RHNA
As shown in Table HE-54, the City’s approach to
meeting its RHNA relies on pipeline projects, vacant
sites, and anticipated development of accessory
dwelling units (ADU) and junior ADUs (JADU). Using this approach, the City has a surplus of sites available to
meet its 2023-2031 RHNA by income category. Tables
A-1 and A-2 in Appendix A provide the characteristics
of each site, including zoning, general plan designation, acreage, and realistic capacity for the sites currently zoned for housing. These sites are all likely to be
developed with residences during the planning period.
Maps of the pipeline projects and vacant sites are
provided in Appendix A. Anticipated ADU/JADU
construction could occur in neighborhoods throughout
the city. Therefore, it’s considered a non-site-specific approach to meeting RHNA and is not mapped.
To ensure that the City has sufficient capacity to
accommodate the RHNA throughout the planning
period, HCD recommends in its “Housing Element Site
Inventory Guidebook” (Government Code Section
65583.2) that the City create a buffer in the sites
inventory of 15 to 30 percent more capacity than
required, especially for capacity to accommodate the
lower-income RHNA. As shown in Table HE-54, the city
has taken this approach and assumed a 30 percent
buffer across all income categories.
Table HE-54: Approach to Meeting 2023-2031 RHNA
INCOME
CATEGORY RHNA
RHNA
WITH 30%
CUSHION
PIPELINE
PROJECTS
VACANT
SITES
ANTICIPATED
ADUS
TOTAL
CAPACITY
SURPLUS
OF RHNA
SURPLUS
OF RHNA
WITH 30%
CUSHION
Extremely Low
Income 1,232 1,602 198 1,526 - 1,724 492 122
Very Low
Income 1,233 1,603 253 1,526 - 1,779 546 176
Low Income 1,548 2,012 145 1,525 108 1,778 230 -234
Moderate
Income 2,572 3,344 353 2,932 54 3,339 767 -5
Above
Moderate
Income
6,088 7,914
13,643
718 18 14,379 8,291 6,465
Total 12,673 16,475 14,592 8,227 180 22,999 10,326 6,524 Source: City of Stockton, 2024.
PROGRAMS TO
ENCOURAGE AND
FACILITATE HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
The City will encourage and facilitate housing
development through several actions.
• Program 6. Accessory Dwelling Units: The
City will update its ADU regulations as
needed throughout the planning period to
address changes to state law and encourage
the construction of ADUs through a range of
strategies, including providing guidance,
educational materials and preapproved ADU
plans, proactively advertising the benefits of
ADUs, and monitoring the success of this
program.
• Program 7. Infill Strategy: The City will
promote infill development with a variety of
strategies that may include assisting with
brownfield remediation, flexible development
standards, planning infrastructure
improvements, and streamlining the
permitting process.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1224
BR-168 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
• Program 8. Infill Site Assembly: The City will
promote infill development by actively
working with local property owners and
developers to assist in the consolidation and
assembly of small infill parcels for residential
projects, processing lot mergers ministerially
and offering incentives.
• Program 9. Government-Owned Sites: The
City will facilitate housing development on
City-owned sites by issuing RFI/SOQs for
development, complying with the Surplus
Lands Act (SLA), and entering into
Development and Disposition Agreements
with developers. The City will facilitate
housing development on sites owned by the
Stockton Unified School District (SUSD) by
coordinating with SDSU to encourage
housing development.
• Program 10. Large Site Development: The
City will facilitate the development of sites
larger than 10 acres.
• Program 12. State and Federal Funding: The
City will support housing organizations and
affordable housing developers by assisting in
applications for funding, drafting letters of
support and resolutions, and identifying
potential sites for affordable housing.
• Program 20. Density Bonus: The City will
continue to offer and promote the use of
density bonuses.
PIPELINE PROJECTS
The City currently has 20 pipeline projects, for a total of 14,592 units that can be counted toward the City’s
RHNA. Anticipated units are based on the project design as approved by the City of Stockton or as submitted by
the applicant. Of the 20 pipeline projects, 8 are 100
percent affordable (may include a moderate or abovemoderate manager’s unit). Of the total 14,592 units, 596 are in the lower-income category, 353 are in the
moderate-income category, and the remaining 13,643
are in the above moderate-income category. Table A-2
in Appendix A provides parcel-level data on the pipeline project sites. A brief description of each pipeline project is included herein. Maps of the pipeline projects, vacant sites, and underutilized sites are provided in Appendix A.
Table HE-55: Pipeline Projects Summary
PIPELINE PROJECTS TOTAL ACRES
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY
Alicia Place 3.68 76 0 1 77
Calaveras Quarters Motel Conversion 2.14 68 1 0 69
Cannery Park 291.80 0 32 490 522
Crystal Bay 174 0 67 1,276 1,343
Delta Cove 359.52 0 77 1,468 1,545
Elderberry Residential Project 18.8 0 0 42 42
Fairview Terrace 1.61 76 0 0 76
Grand View Village 0.79 75 0 0 75
Harding Apartments 1.02 0 4 18 22
Hunter House New Apartments 0.69 120 0 0 120
La Passeggiata Affordable Housing
Project 0.83 94 0 0 94
Mobile Homes on El Dorado 7.06 0 18 104 122
Park Center Apartments 0.98 50 0 1 51
Sanctuary 1,950.46 0 0 5,758 5,758
Sonora Square Apartments 0.92 37 0 0 37
Swain Crossing Apartments 1.58 0 5 31 36
Tra Vigne 318.05 0 0 1,503 1,503
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1225
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-169
PIPELINE PROJECTS TOTAL ACRES
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY
Trinity Parkway Apartments 4.32 0 18 102 120
University Park 103.47 0 0 359 359
Westlake at Spanos Park 347.08 0 131 2,490 2,621
Total 3,588.8 596 353 13,643 14,592
Source: City of Stockton, 2023.
ALICIA PLACE
The Alicia Place project proposes the conversion of an
existing hotel into 77 individual residential units,
including a manager's unit. It will be a 100% affordable housing development designed to cater to larger
households facing homelessness, with income levels at
or below 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The
project will provide 47 studios, 24 one-bedroom
apartments, and 6 two-bedroom apartments, catering
to a range of household sizes and needs.
As of November 2023, the applicants are currently
working with the Economic Development Department
(EDD) and the state to secure funding for this project.
The project has been awarded funding through the
HHAP Grant Program.
The project is anticipated to receive its planning
entitlement approval in early 2024. The initial timeline set by the developers aimed for project completion and
Certificate of Occupancy acquisition by June 2024.
CALAVERAS QUARTERS MOTEL
CONVERSION
The Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin
(HACSJ) will convert an existing 122-unit motel into 68 deed-restricted housing units affordable to lowerincome households and one manager’s unit affordable to a moderate-income household. The application
requests a density bonus of 35 percent per municipal
code Section 16.40. As of January 2023, this project
was in the site plan review and design review phase. The project will have project-based vouchers and provide
permanent housing for those experiencing chronic
homelessness, homeless youth, and youth at risk of
homelessness. The 2.14-acre parcel on March Lane will
have 11 ADA ground-floor units and 7 units designated
for the hearing and visually impaired. The newly
converted property will also have a community room,
laundry facilities, and substantial assigned parking for residents. Partners for this project include Parents by Choice, Aspirant, Lutheran Social Services of Northern
California, Mary Magdalene Community Service,
STAND, and Children’s Home of Stockton. These
partners will provide case management, life skills
training, behavioral health services, education and
employment services, legal assistance, parenting
classes, and addiction recovery services for the residents of Calaveras Quarters.
Out of the total projected cost of $30,220,000,
HomeKey Program, Round 2, has provided
$24.9 million, and $6.5 million has been secured by
the City of Stockton American Rescue Plan (ARPA). The
City of Stockton is the responsible entity, and the HACSJ would be the recipient. The project site is currently
developed with former motel buildings and
accompanying parking lot. The land on which the
existing structure is located is entirely urbanized, as are the adjacent parcels.
CANNERY PARK
Per the executed Development Agreement, the Cannery
Park project will be built on approximately 450 acres of land at the southwest corner of State Route 99 and
Eight-Mile Road. Of the original 450 acres, a remaining 291.82 acres are available for residential development.
It will include new residential areas, 1,452,508 square feet of light industrial business parkland, and
1,078,763 square feet of commercial land. During the
planning period, the City anticipates that 312 new
single-family homes and 210 multifamily homes will be
constructed. Of the total 522 homes, it is anticipated
that 490 will be affordable to above-moderate income
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1226
BR-170 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
households, and 32 will be affordable to moderateincome households.
Recently, Community Facilities District 2005-1 and
Community Facilities District CFO 2019-1 were
established, and LGJ Homes acquired Cannery Park
units 6 through 9, consisting of 387 single-family lots, and recorded final subdivision maps, constructed public improvements, and started single-family home
construction and sales. KB Home North Bay LLC
acquired Cannery Park units 10 through 12, consisting
of 128 single-family lots, and subsequently recorded
final subdivision maps, constructed public improvement, and started single-family home construction and sales.
Construction of the Holman Road Bridge over Bear
Creek was started with an anticipated completion date
of spring 2023. There is no remaining barrier to
development because the project is in the final stages of development. Future submittals for Cannery residential
uses include ministerial design review for the residential units (master plan homes and apartments),
improvements plan for the grading, and recordation of
the final map. Though apartment complexes are
allowed by right and only require ministerial review,
should the applicant request condominiums, a
subdivision map would need approval prior to the
recordation of the new condominium lots. The applicant
has requested to convert most of the Regional
Commercial area in the subdivision to over 300
additional single-family homes beyond the original
approval. That conversion requires a rezone and new
subdivision map and would have to be approved by the
Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant
anticipates that approval in 2023, with ministerial
design review and construction of the additional homes
shortly thereafter, depending on the housing market.
CRYSTAL BAY
According to the executed development agreement, the
Crystal Bay project will be built on approximately 174
acres of land on the south side of Eight Mile Road, east of Rio Blanco Road, and west of Westlake Drive. A wide
variety of park and open space amenities will be
included. During the planning period, the City
anticipates that 1,343 new homes will be constructed.
The Crystal Bay project was originally approved as a
part of the development agreement for the Westlake at
Spanos West Master Development Plan and is included
in the Spanos West Business Park Density Transfer
Agreement. Of the 1,343 homes, it is anticipated that
1,276 will be affordable to above-moderate income
households, and 67 will be affordable to moderateincome households.
On April 10, 2008, the Stockton Planning Commission
approved the Crystal Bay Development Agreement
(expires January 10, 2040), Planned Unit Residential
Development (PURD) standards, a Vesting Tentative
Map of Tract No. 3585, and the environmental impact
report for the project area. The PURD standards are the primary regulatory document for the master-planned
community and go beyond zoning to regulated use and
design. The standards allow a variety of residential and nonresidential uses and permit a wide variety of housing types due to the increased flexibility of the PURD. This residential flexibility includes multiunit housing (duplex, triplex), courtyards, mobile homes, organizational
housing, townhouses, and senior housing. Most
residential land uses are medium density (806 units at
8.8 to 17.4 units/acre) and high-density housing (392
units at 17.5 to 29.0 units/acre).
The development of Crystal Bay is planned as an
extension of the Westlake subdivision, which is
immediately adjacent to the project and currently under development. Accordingly, the extension of
infrastructure, services, and roads is a shared effort. The projects entered into a cost-sharing agreement with the objective of phasing the extensions in a cost-effective, orderly, and complete fashion. There are no major
barriers left to prohibit construction because any
regional impact was addressed during the initial
construction of the Westlake project. Future submittals for residential uses include ministerial design review for the residential units (master plan homes and
apartments), improvements plan for the grading, and
recordation of the final map. While apartment
complexes are allowed by right and only require
ministerial review, should the applicant request
condominiums, a subdivision map would need approval
prior to the recordation of the new condominium lots.
Construction of Crystal Bay is anticipated to begin
before the end of 2025 and be completed within the
planning period.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1227
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-171
DELTA COVE
Per the executed development agreement, the Delta
Cove project is facilitated by a general plan
amendment, rezone, a planned development, a vesting
tentative map, and an addendum/initial study to a
previously certified environmental impact report for a
project also known as “Delta Cove.” The project will
include new residential areas (including single-family
detached homes and a condominium project) with
parks, open space, and commercial use on three vacant
parcels totaling 360 acres. During the planning period, the City anticipates that 1,545 new homes will be
constructed, and it is anticipated that 1,468 will be
affordable to above-moderate income households, and
77 will be affordable to moderate-income households.
The project is designed to provide pedestrian
connectivity throughout the development, avoid
wetlands, provide more park/open space and
recreational uses, and provide a healthier living
environment utilizing the live, work, play concept. Delta Cove proposes a variety of single-family attached and
detached housing options (approximately 1,164 units)
as well as multifamily/condominium housing options
(approximately 381 units) and Commercial
Neighborhood (CN) employment and retail use. The
project encourages a mix of housing types and lot sizes by incorporating the traditional single-family home with cluster products, alley-loaded products, small-lot
products, mixed-use, and condominium housing types.
Lot sizes range from 32 feet x 68 feet (2,000 square
feet) to 55 feet x 100 feet (5,500 square feet).
There are no major barriers left to prohibit construction because any regional impact was addressed during the
initial construction of the Westlake and Spanos West
projects nearby. Future submittals for residential uses include ministerial design review for the residential units (master plan homes and apartments), improvements
plan for the grading, and recordation of the final map.
While apartment complexes are allowed by right and
only require ministerial review, should the applicant
request condominiums, a subdivision map would need
approval prior to the recordation of the new
condominium lots. Construction of Delta Cove is
anticipated to begin before the end of 2025 and be
completed within the planning period.
ELDERBERRY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
Per the provisions of the planned development permit,
the Elderberry Residential project will consist of 42
single-family dwellings for a senior housing project. As of January 2023, this project was in the process of
applying for a tentative subdivision map, planned
development permit, and design review to subdivide the
17.32-acre site into 43 parcels to facilitate the
development. Forty-two parcels will be constructed with single-family homes on the south side of Villa Point
before the end of the planning period. The forty-third
parcel on the north side of Villa Point will be reserved for future multifamily development.
The project includes roadway improvements,
landscaping, open space, common areas, and at least
one amenity (e.g., recreational facility, parks and play fields, tot lots). Future submittals for residential uses include ministerial design review for the residential units (master plan homes), improvements plan for the
grading, and recordation of the final map. While the 42 units are intended to be market rate, the applicant could request a ministerial affordable housing agreement with the City to convert some of the units in the future to help secure funding.
FAIRVIEW TERRACE
In May 2023, the City sold 2 parcels, totaling 1.27
acres to STAND. STAND is a group of residents working
together in the Southeast Stockton neighborhood on
several affordable housing programs. STAND proposes
to develop a 4-story senior housing development with
associated on- and off-site improvements on this site in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. The
project is located at the southeast corner of South
Airport Way and East Eighth Street.
The project is eligible for a Tier-2 Supplemental Density Bonus of 100%. This allows for a number of concessions
or incentives, including setback reductions, off-street parking reductions, waivers for lot coverage and floor
area ratio (FAR), and building height increases.
The City of Stockton has approved a Site Plan Review,
Design Review, and Density Bonus application for the
development of a 76-unit, four-story affordable senior
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1228
BR-172 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
housing project with 1,180 square feet of ground-floor
commercial space and associated site improvements.
The project is a 100% affordable housing development
for seniors with a household income at 30%-60% (low-
/very-low) of the area median income. To ensure
affordability, the project proponents will enter into a 55- year regulatory agreement (Density Bonus Housing
Agreement) prior to occupancy. The project will also
provide a mix of studio, one-bedroom, and twobedroom apartments, catering to a range of household sizes and needs.
GRAND VIEW VILLAGE
The Grand View Terrace mixed-use project consists of
75 multifamily deed-restricted affordable housing units and approximately 16,893 square feet of ground-floor
nonresidential uses in a four-story building. Units will be one-, two- and three-bedroom units for lower-income
families. As of February 2023, demolition and site
preparation work had begun.
The ground floor will include commercial spaces,
offices, a community center, a Head Start, and a grocery store. Grand View Village will be a transit-oriented
development, focusing on connecting the residents and
surrounding community with employment providers,
schools, the downtown regional transit center, and the
Robert Cabral train station through enhanced services,
new bicycle paths, and improved sidewalks. Residents
will be offered free bus passes for three years.
The nonprofit developer, Visionary Home Builders of
California, secured $37 million in funding from the state and the city of Stockton. No other permits or approvals are needed from the City.
HARDING APARTMENTS
This office conversion into apartments project will
convert an office into multifamily housing (22 units) with exterior building revisions of the existing single-story building. As of January 2023, this project was in the
process of design and site plan review. The project
includes 4 studios, 16 one-bedroom, and 2 twobedroom units with a small space for a shared office and gym. Future submittals for residential uses include improvements plan for the grading and building permits
for unit construction. No other approvals are needed
from the City. Due to their size, it is anticipated that the four studios would be affordable to moderate-income
households. The remaining 18 units are anticipated to
be affordable to above-moderate-income households.
The applicant could request a ministerial affordable
housing agreement with the City to convert some of the
market-rate units to affordable in the future to help
secure funding.
HUNTER HOUSE NEW APARTMENTS
The Hunter House New Apartments project consists of a
new four-story, 120-unit apartment complex with a mix
of one- and two-bedroom apartments, an underground
garage, and 2920 square feet of nonresidential uses on
the ground floor. There will be a community room, two
elevators, two laundry rooms, and a workout and fitness area for tenants. The units will be restricted to
households at the following income levels: 1) 72 units
earning less than 30 percent average median income
(AMI) (extremely low income); and 2) 48 units earning
less than 50 percent AMI (very low income). The project will serve special needs populations such as the
disabled, seniors, veterans, the mentally ill, and other people with special needs.
With assistance from SJCOG, Service First of Northern
California received a $27 million Affordable Housing
and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) grant to
complete a funding package to build the project. The
AHSC grant will help cover construction, programming,
and transportation improvements (including a new
railcar for the Altamont Corridor Express). The AHSC
grant will cover street lighting, trees, drought-tolerant landscaping as well as street, sidewalk, and curb
improvements, including bike lanes. The location is
close to Downtown Stockton, the transit center,
numerous civic institutions, commercial uses, and social services. As of January 2023, this project was in the
design and site plan review phase. This will be the fifth affordable housing site that Service First will offer, after Winslow Village Apartments, Paulette’s Manor,
Coventry Apartments, and Zettie’s Haven. The site is
currently vacant. Only building permits are needed from the City before construction can begin.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1229
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-173
LA PASSEGGIATA AFFORDABLE
HOUSING PROJECT
The project consists of 94 deed-restricted affordable
units for households at the following income levels:1)
78 units earning less than 50 percent AMI (very low
income); and 2) 16 units earning less than 80 percent
AMI (low income). Valley Home Builders, with Pearl
Homes, will construct two buildings, connected by a
bridge, that will serve as affordable housing for seniors and families in downtown Stockton. The buildings will
have solar power, energy-efficient electrical appliances, smart home artificial intelligence, and rooftop gardens.
The project will be built on a surplus property controlled by the State Controller’s Office that was identified as one of the first excess properties to be offered for
development of affordable housing. The project will be
the first modular multifamily development in Stockton.
Visionary Home Builders was selected as the developer.
The property is in the City’s Miner Avenue Complete
Street Project, a rehabilitation and beautification
project. The project was awarded $18.5 million in
Multifamily Housing Program funding. As of January
2023, project representatives were applying for an Infill Infrastructure Grant and Department of Toxic
Substances Control funding to address site
contamination. As of February 2023, project
representatives were determining whether approvals
and permits will be issued by the State or the City. The City is responsible for permits pertaining to utility
connections, off-site improvements, and collection of
required service and impact fees.
MOBILE HOMES ON EL DORADO
The Mobile Home project consists of a new, 122-unit
mobile home complex with 183 parking spaces, drive
aisles, landscaping, and lighting. As of January 2023,
this project was in the administrative use permit phase.
Of the 122 homes, it is anticipated that 104 will be
affordable to above-moderate income households, and
18 will be affordable to moderate-income households.
The privately funded project is approved to proceed in
obtaining construction permits; however, new mobile
home parks are regulated at the State level under the
California Mobile Home Act, which designates HCD as
the review and approval authority for matters where the City does not have jurisdiction. Accordingly, HCD has
primary jurisdiction over mobile-home park building
permit applications.
The applicant is responsible for requesting City building permits for frontage (road) improvements and utility
connections as well as the payment of all construction
and service-related fees; however, an independent
application, construction plans, and maintenance plan
would need to be submitted to HCD as the responsible
agency. No other approvals are needed through the
City. Estimated plans and sales/lease information has
not been provided to the State for their review. The City anticipates that the project will be completed during the planning period.
PARK CENTER APARTMENTS
The Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin
(HACSJ) has announced the development of Park
Center Apartments, a permanent supportive housing
project designed to provide affordable housing for
individuals and families experiencing homelessness and
mental illness. The project will consist of two buildings located at 709 N. Center Street.
The first building, a historic office building, will be redesigned and retrofitted to include 23 residential units and a manager's unit. The second building will be a new construction and will include 27 residential units. All 50 units will be affordable to individuals and families with incomes at or below 60% of the area median income.
One unit will also be available at market value. The
project will provide on-site supportive services to
residents, including case management, mental health
counseling, and substance abuse treatment. No existing
residences are affected so no relocation plan is needed.
HACSJ has partnered with San Joaquin Behavioral
Health Services (SJCBHS) to develop the project.
SJCBHS will provide funding for the project through the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). Park Center
Apartments received site plan review and design review
approval in February 2022. Construction of Park Center
is expected to begin in early 2024 and be completed in
late 2024.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1230
BR-174 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SANCTUARY
Per the executed development agreement, the Sanctuary
project will include new 5,758 homes, 483,984 square
feet of offices, 208,272 square feet of retail, and
approximately 100 hotel rooms as well as three lakes,
a marina, a private river club, religious facilities, four schools, orchards, vineyards, a small winery, and
extensive recreational open space. The entire Sanctuary property, which extends into the surrounding sloughs,
totals 1,967 acres; however, the total land area is about 1,839 acres, including the adjacent levee, and only
1,72 8acres of the total land are considered
developable; the remaining 111 acres consist of the
Levee Walk. Project construction will include
improvements to the existing levees. During the
planning period, the City anticipates that 5,758 new
homes will be constructed. All 5,758 are counted
toward the City’s above-moderate RHNA.
Although a village in itself, the Sanctuary consists of four smaller villages, each featuring pedestrian-friendly treelined streets, small neighborhood greens, and convenient access to the Sanctuary’s other land uses
through an interconnected street system, sidewalks, and a public pathway system. These villages, known as the
Village Center, the Marina Village, the Great Park
Village and the Lake Village are central to the civic,
social, and residential heart of the community.
Residential uses will have various densities throughout the site, meeting the needs of a variety of residents. The Sanctuary plan includes traditional market rate, age
restricted, gated communities, and mixed-use buildings
and will include both for-sale and rental properties. The Sanctuary Master Development Plan includes a wide
range of housing types, sizes, and arrangements,
including garden apartments, condominiums, or flats
(all with the option of being for sale or for rent).
Development of the Sanctuary site will likely consist of four phases expected to be implemented over a number
of years according to the housing market. The
infrastructure will be developed as required by the City of Stockton. Some infrastructure, such as backbone
transportation improvements (bridges, etc.), will need to be complete prior to adjacent development. In order to
proceed to the next phase, the prior phase must have
completed at least 50 percent or more of the final
mapping for that phase, and at least 50 percent or more of the requisite off-site infrastructure shall be either in place or bonded for. The requisite infrastructure for the commercial and industrial land uses shall be built in
equal proportions to the residential land uses
developed.
The developer’s civil engineering firm has prepared
lotting studies, circulation exhibits, grading studies, and general civil engineering assessments. Plans are
underway for levee design and permitting. Additional
levee analysis and improvement are needed prior to offsite infrastructure (utilities, roads) work can begin.
Future submittals for residential uses include ministerial design review for the residential units (master plan
homes and apartments), improvements plan for the
grading, and recordation of the final map. While
apartment complexes are allowed by right and only
require ministerial review, should the applicant request condominiums, a subdivision map would need approval
before the recordation of the new condominium lots.
SONORA SQUARE APARTMENTS
The Sonora Square Apartments project is a partnership
with San Joaquin Behavioral Health Services (SJCBHS)
and the HACSJ to provide 37 affordable, permanent
supportive housing units for individuals who are
experiencing homelessness, chronic homelessness, are
at risk of chronic homelessness, and who are in need of mental health services. HACSJ and SJCBHS were
awarded Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, nearly $2.1
million in noncompetitive No Place Like Home funds,
$4.6 million through the Mental Health Services Act,
and $456,000 in CDBG funds from the City of
Stockton. The HACSJ is providing project-based,
housing choice voucher rental assistance for all units, and SJCBHS will provide supportive services to
residents. The 37 one-bedroom units will be 600 square
feet each. The ministerial design review of the project was approved. As of February 2023, construction was
in process.
SWAIN CROSSING APARTMENTS
The Swain Crossing Apartments project includes four 3-
story buildings and a total of 36 apartment units, 63
parking spaces, landscaping, and site improvements.
The project is requesting an administrative exception for a reduction in the front-yard setback from 15 feet to a Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1231
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-175
minimum of 12 feet. As of January 2023, this project
was in the process of design and site plan review and
the administrative exception application.
Future submittals for residential uses include
improvements plan for the grading and building permits
for unit construction. No other approvals are needed
from the City. Of the 36 homes, it is anticipated that 5 will be affordable to above moderate-income
households, and 31 will be affordable to moderateincome households. The applicant could request a ministerial affordable housing agreement with the City
to convert some of the market-rate units to affordable in the future to help secure funding.
TRA VIGNE
The Tra Vigne project is facilitated by a general plan
amendment, annexation prezoning, and vesting
tentative maps for the project’s two subset areas of
development, Tra Vigne East and Tra Vigne West. Of
the 341.17 total acres comprising the approved project, 318.05 acres are available for residential development.
The remaining acreage are reserved for detention
basins. The project will include new residences,
101,500 square feet of commercial uses, up to 20.36
acres of nontraditional park area, and up to 15.07
acres of traditional park area. Additionally, the project would establish a 14.7-acre K-8 school site to be
developed by the Lodi Unified School District. During
the planning period, the City anticipates that 1,503 new homes will be constructed in both subdivision maps. On
February 17, 2021, annexation was approved and the
vesting tentative map became effective. As of February
2023, one map extension has been approved by the
Planning Commission, and the project now has an
expiration date of February 17, 2024. Two more can be
granted per the City’s municipal code.
The first stages of development would be in Tra Vigne
West along the southwest portion of the project site
along West Lane and then generally toward the east and
north in up to 12 separate phases. Tra Vigne East is
anticipated to be developed following Tra Vigne West,
in up to four separate phases. The project applicants
have stated to City staff that they will build single-family homes on large and small lots.
All 1,503 dwelling units are counted toward the City’s
above-moderate RHNA and are expected to be
constructed during the planning period.
TRINITY PARKWAY APARTMENTS
The Trinity Parkway Apartments project includes 120
apartment units. As of January 2023, this project was in the process of design and site plan review,
administrative determination, exceptions, and land
development applications. Of the 120 homes, it is
anticipated that 102 will be affordable to abovemoderate income households, and 18 will be affordable to moderate income households.
UNIVERSITY PARK
Per the executed development agreement, the University
Park project will be a mixed-use development that
includes a long-term educational center and a mix of
commercial and residential development on
approximately 103 acres. Existing historic buildings in the area will be retained. During the planning period,
the City anticipates that 359 new homes will be
constructed, affordable to above-moderate income
households. In 2022, the applicant completed the
construction of the 63,000-square-foot, 50-bed
Stockton Rehabilitation Hospital, a small middle school, and Stockton Rehab Hospital. There is no remaining
barrier for development. Future submittals for residential uses include ministerial design review for the residential units (master plan homes and apartments),
improvements plan for the grading, and recordation of
the final map. While apartment complexes are allowed
by right and only require ministerial review, should the applicant request condominiums, a subdivision map
would need approval prior to the recordation of the new condominium lots.
WESTLAKE AT SPANOS PARK
Per the executed development agreement, the Westlake
at Spanos Park project is facilitated by a development
agreement for the Westlake at Spanos West Master
Development Plan. The Westlake at Spanos Park project
will be built on approximately 690 acres of land that
include the existing Paradise Point Marina (Paradise
Marina), which is leased to a third-party operator and
will be modernized or updated at a later time in
accordance with the Master Development Plan. Of the
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1232
BR-176 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
original 690 acres, a remaining 347.08 acres are
available for residential development. During the
planning period, the City anticipates that 2,621 new
detached single-family homes will be constructed.
The Westlake Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map was
approved by the City of Stockton Planning Commission
on October 14, 2004, and the City of Stockton
Community Development Director on January 13,
2005. The Westlake Final Map was approved by the
City Council on January 31, 2006. The subdivision
agreement was entered into by the City and original
owner, as subdivider, on January 31, 2006, and
amended in 2006, 2010, and 2014. The original
owner and Spanos obtained permits and approvals
from governmental or quasi-governmental agencies
that also have jurisdiction over the project, including the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department
of Fish and Wildlife. In 2006, following execution of the subdivision agreement, original owner sold a portion of the property, which was subsequently developed. In
2014, the majority of the remaining land within
Westlake was transferred from original owner to
Stockton Westlake Investment LLC, a California limited
liability company. Additional portions of the areas
identified on the Westlake Final Map were subsequently
developed. Numerous transportation improvements,
landscaping and underground utilities, sewer and
stormwater infrastructure, a lake and recreation area
have been installed, with additional work ongoing as of February 2023. Phasing continues with lots being sold
incrementally to developers, developed, and sold to
individual homeowners. Land is reserved for public
schools and a fire station. As of May 2023, 347.08 of
the 690 acres remained and are anticipated to develop
within the planning period.
In some of these areas, grading has commenced and
there are imminent plans for adding underground
utilities and paving streets. Lennar Homes intends to
commence home construction and sales of “Villages A,
B and K” in 2023. Construction of Lake 3 is complete,
and two 72-inch connection pipes have been installed
that will be connected to the lake in Crystal Bay at a
future date. Improvement plans for the spine roads in
the active adult villages will be submitted to the City in 2023.
There is no remaining barrier for development. Future
submittals for residential uses include ministerial design review for the residential units (master plan homes and apartments), improvements plan for the grading, and
recordation of the final map. While apartment
complexes are allowed by right and only require
ministerial review, should the applicant request
condominiums, a subdivision map would need approval
prior to the recordation of the new condominium lots.
VACANT SITES
The sites inventory contains 594 properties totaling
540.22 acres. As shown in Table HE-54, the total
capacity of the vacant sites is 8,227 units (lower income:
4,577, moderate income: 2,932, and above moderate
income: 718). Anticipated units are based on the
realistic capacity assumptions described earlier. Table A-1 in Appendix A provides parcel-level data on the
sites. Maps of the pipeline projects and vacant sites are provided in Appendix A.
LARGE SITES WITH LOWER-INCOME
UNIT CAPACITY
• Site 9-12: This site is 23.96 acres (18.96
acres used to calculate the unit yield), with RH
zoning, outside of downtown, with a realistic
capacity of 455 lower-income units. Five
acres were omitted from the unit calculation
to account for the anticipated extension of
March Lane east from Holman Road to
connect with SR99. This large HDR parcel
was part of a larger single-family residential
subdivision referred to as Blossom Ranch.
The Blossom Ranch project area including
the HDR parcel was annexed into the City in
1990. The first subdivision map was created
in 1996 and established the HDR parcel and
single-family lots around it. There has been
previous interest from developers in
developing the HDR parcel.
• Site 12-34: This site is 50.02 total acres with
RH zoning, outside of downtown with a
realistic capacity of 626 lower-income units.
In 2023, the City approved a Tentative Parcel
Map to initiate the process of splitting the
parcel into 4 parcels and rezoning 2 of the 4
parcels. The 50.02-acre parcel is in the
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1233
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-177
process of becoming: 7.12 acres with CG
zoning, 10.00 acres with RH zoning, 12.16
acres with RH zoning and 20.74 acres with
RL zoning. Only the portions with CG and RH
zoning are used to calculate anticipated unit
yield, with realistic capacity modifiers of
44.6% on the CG portion and 80% on the
RH portions.
• Site 12-35: This site is 19.35 acres with CL
zoning, outside of downtown with a realistic
capacity of 259 lower-income units.
• Site 12-36: This site is 12.90 acres with CL
zoning, outside of downtown with a realistic
capacity of 172 lower-income units.
The City has a strong track record of large sites
developing with housing. The sites 12-34, 12-35 and
12-36 are in South Stockton, west of Interstate-5 and
north of French Camp Rd. Immediately west of site 12-
36 and close to site 12-35 is a recently built subdivision called Cornerstone. This project doesn’t include
affordable units. The developer informed the City that
they are looking for additional land to continue to build housing. Several pipeline projects have large parcels
that are anticipated to develop which further
substantiates the assumption that these large sites will develop. Table HE-53: Representative Projects lists three projects on sites larger than 10 acres. These three
projects have an average built density of 86 percent of the allowed density for each site:
• Eight Mile House Apartments, 13.5 acres,
384 units; developed at 95 percent of
allowed density in the RM zone. This project
doesn’t include affordable units.
• Morada Crossings (Palms at Morada), 10.17
acres, 216 units; developed at 71 percent of
allowed density in the RH zone. This project
doesn’t include affordable units.
• Sierra Vista Phase I and Phase II, 13.4 acres,
215 units, 100% affordable; developed at 93
percent of allowed density in the RH zone.
The City has included Program 10. Large Site
Development to facilitate the development of these sites.
GOVERNMENT-OWNED SITES AND
SITES WITH LOT CONSOLIDATION
POTENTIAL
The land inventory includes sites that are owned by the City and sites that are owned by Stockton Unified School District (SUSD) (“Government-Owned”). The City has
included Program 10. Large Site Development to
facilitate the development of these sites. Additionally, there are several groups of sites that have strong
potential for lot consolidation; some of these groups are government-owned and some are privately owned. The
City will promote infill development with a variety of
strategies including assisting with brownfield
remediation, flexible development standards, planned
infrastructure improvements, and streamlining the
permitting process. The City will also actively work with local property owners and developers to assist in the
consolidation and assembly of small infill parcels by
processing lot mergers ministerially and offering
incentives. The City has included Housing Element
Programs 8 and 9 which set forth the incentives and
strategies to develop and address these sites.
Table A-1 in Appendix A provides parcel-level data on
the sites, including identification of the consolidated groups and ownership. Additional details about these
sites are provided herein.
Upcoming 2023 City of Stockton RFI/SOQ
The City is currently drafting a Request for
Information/Statement of Qualifications (RFI/SOQ). All
properties in the RFI/SOQ will be subject to the Surplus Lands Act (SLA). The SLA mandates that no fewer than
fifteen percent (15 percent) of the units be reserved as affordable for lower-income households (80 percent
AMI). Furthermore, all properties in this upcoming
RFI/SOQ share the same estimated timeline:
• RFI/SOQ Issued: Q4 2023
• Entitlements: June 2025
• Building Permits: December 2025
• Construction Complete: June 2027
The following 5 sets of parcels (8 total parcels) are
included in the upcoming 2023 RFI/SOQ:
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1234
BR-178 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
• Sites 4-96, 4-97, and 4-230, totaling 0.34
acres, with a realistic capacity of 3 lowerincome units and 9 above moderate-income units. These parcels are contiguous and
make up part of the "Lafayette and Stanislaus
Properties." The City will not require that
contiguous parcels be developed as one
project. However, depending on the interest
received and the scale of the project, the City
will facilitate a merger or lot line adjustment.
If no interest is received for these 3 parcels,
then the City will consider a merger.
• Site 4-33: This site is 1.66 acres, with a
realistic capacity of 17 lower-income units
and 102 above moderate-income units. This
is the other parcel associated with the
“Lafayette and Stanislaus Properties” and is
separated from the other three by an access
drive. The collective “Lafayette and Stanislaus
Properties” are integral to a draft
Neighborhood Action Plan for the Little
Manila / Gleason Park neighborhood, which
is part of the Shape Stockton planning effort
happening concurrent with the Housing
Element Update.
• Sites 4-231 and 4-232: This site totals 0.52
acres, and a realistic total capacity of 1
lower-income unit and 5 above moderateincome units. These two contiguous parcels constitute the "Airport Way and Folsom Street
Properties." Similar to the "Lafayette and
Stanislaus Properties," the City does not
mandate the development of these
contiguous parcels as a single project.
However, contingent upon the level of interest
received and the project's scale, the City will
facilitate a merger or lot line adjustment. In
the absence of expressed interest for these
two parcels, the City will contemplate a
merger or lot line adjustment for the "Airport
Way and Folsom Street Properties" as well.
• Site 3-74: This site is 0.4 acres, with a
realistic total capacity of 1 lower-income unit
and 1 above moderate-income unit. This
parcel is referred to as the “Lafayette Street
Property”.
• Site 4-183: This site is 0.33 acres with a
realistic capacity of 1 lower-income unit and
3 above moderate-income units. This parcel
is referred to as the “Airport Way and 8th
Street Property”.
Collectively, these sites have a realistic capacity of 23 lower-income units and 120 above moderate-income
units for a total of 143 units. Other Government
Owned Sites in this category include 21 parcels owned
by SUSD, and 6 parcels owned by the City.
• Sites 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-
42: This site consists of 21 parcels, totaling
3.7 acres. All parcels are owned by SUSD.
The site is bounded by W Market Street to the
north, S Lincoln Street to the west, W
Washington Street to the south and S
Madison Street to the east. All parcels are
contiguous except where divided by S Van
Buren and S Monroe Streets. As described in
Program 9, the City is committed to
continuing to coordinate with SDSU on
development plans for these parcels. If a plan
for housing development on these parcels is
not underway by 2026, the City will
determine whether additional sites for
housing must be identified, and identify them
accordingly, as needed.
• Sites 1-18 through 1-21: This site is known
as South Pointe and consists of 4 parcels,
totaling 9.1 acres. The City issued an RFP for
this site on June 25, 2020. The RFP called for
a total of 520 units, with no fewer than 15
percent of the total units reserved as
affordable for lower-income households,
since the site is subject to the SLA. The
development will include market rate,
workforce, independent senior living, and
affordable units, up to 16,000 square feet of
commercial retail space, up to 4,000 square
feet of space dedicated to educational uses,
and ancillary site improvements such as
parking and landscape areas. The RBH
Group was awarded an Exclusive
Negotiating Rights Agreement for the site by
City Council in December 2020, however, a
Development and Disposition Agreement is
still in development. The project has received
a grant to assist with the necessary site
remediation. The anticipated development is
considered a permitted use in the CD zone.
However, because the site is within the
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1235
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-179
Channel Area District Overlay, a use permit
from the Planning Commission is required.
Subsequent to approval by the Commission,
a ministerial permit approval would be
required for the review of building design and
compliance with site development standards
prior to project development. Future
development would require a grading permit
to remove contaminated soil, which would
occur prior to construction. A lot merger for
the parcels that make up the site may also be
required to prevent construction across
property lines. However, no lot merger is
proposed at this time. As described in the
RFP, the project will be completed in 2
phases. Since the anticipated completion
date for phase 2 is beyond the duration of the
6 th cycle, its units are not counted towards the
City’s RHNA in this inventory. The anticipated
timeline is:
o Phase 1: 300 units (45 lower-income and
255 above moderate-income)
▪ Entitlements: October 2024
▪ Building Permits: May 2025
▪ Construction Complete: July 2027
o Phase 2: 220 units (33 lower-income and
187 above moderate-income)
▪ Entitlements: June 2031
▪ Building Permits: January 2032
▪ Construction Complete: March 2034
• Site 4-67: This site is 0.46 acres with a
realistic total capacity of 18 above moderateincome units. This site is part of a larger area that was recently zoned for mixed-use. The
City will assess the suitability of declaring this
site surplus based on potential interest in
developing the site with a mixed-use
development. As stated in Program 9, If a
plan for housing development on this parcel
is not underway by 2026, with building
permits issued by June 2029 the City will
determine whether additional sites for
housing must be identified, and identify them
accordingly, as needed, including rezoning
sites to address the RHNA if needed. The site
is landlocked by the railroad and a privately
owned parcel and will need remediation prior
to development. If the City declares the site
surplus, it will be subject to the SLA and will
have the following estimated schedule:
o RFI/SOQ Issued: Anticipated Q2 2025
o Entitlements: June 2026
o Building Permits: December 2026
o Construction Complete: June 2028
• Site 4-210: This site is 2.73 acres with a
realistic total capacity of 19 above moderateincome units. The City will assess the suitability of declaring this site surplus based
on potential interest in developing the site
with a residential development. As stated in
Program 9, If a plan for housing development
on this parcel is not underway by 2026, with
building permits issued by June 2029 the City
will determine whether additional sites for
housing must be identified, and identify them
accordingly, as needed, including rezoning
sites to address the RHNA if needed. It is
adjacent to a drainage area from a
developed subdivision and contiguous with 2
vacant sites in the inventory under private
ownership (4-158 and 4-159). If the City
declares the site surplus, it will be subject to
the SLA and will have the following estimated
schedule:
o RFI/SOQ Issued: Anticipated Q2 2025
o Entitlements: June 2026
o Building Permits: December 2026
o Construction Complete: June 2028
Privately-Owned Sites with Lot
Consolidation Potential
Lastly, privately owned sites with potential for lot
consolidation are detailed herein. As described above,
Programs 7 and 8 set forth the incentives and strategies to develop and address these sites.
• Sites 4-15 through 4-26: These sites are
composed of 12 parcels, totaling 1.61 acres,
with a realistic capacity of 60 moderateincome units. This site area forms an entire block and is outlined by W. Lafayette Street,
S. Center Street, W. Sonora Street, and S.
Commerce Street consisting of 12 vacant
parcels. Eight of these parcels are under
common ownership, while the remaining 4
are owned by 4 individual owners. The
collectively owned parcels share some
adjacencies, with the others interspersed,
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1236
BR-180 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
forming a patchwork. While the entire block
is included and totals 1.61 acres, each parcel
is smaller than a half-acre. The anticipated
units are counted towards the moderateincome RHNA. Each site can develop independently, possessing street frontage.
• Sites 4-27 through 4-30: This site is 4
parcels, totaling 0.94 acres, with a realistic
capacity of 11 low-income units. However,
no units are counted towards the City’s RHNA
on these parcels. These 4 contiguous parcels
are under common ownership. Formerly the
4 parcels were owned by 2 entities (each
owned 2 of the parcels) and as of recently the
same owner owns all 4, indicating the owner
is interested in developing the 4 parcels
together. The sites are vacant except for a
very small area of remnant concrete from a
former use. The concrete is severely broken
and full of weeds. There are no active uses
on the sites.
• Sites 3-1 through 3-3: This site is 3 parcels,
totaling 6.4 acres, with a realistic capacity of
84 low-income units. However, no units are
counted towards the City’s RHNA on these
parcels. These are contiguous vacant parcels
and under common ownership.
• Sites 3-4 and 3-5: This site is two parcels
totaling 0.41 acres, with a realistic capacity
of 16 moderate-income units. The 2 parcels
are under common ownership and adjacent
to each other.
• Sites 4-1 through 4-14: This site is 14
parcels, totaling 2.01 acres, with a realistic
capacity of 74 low-income units. However,
no units are counted towards the City’s RHNA
on these parcels. This site consists of an entire
block bounded by W. Sonora Street, S.
Lincoln Street, W. Church Street, and S.
Harrison Street All parcels are owned by St.
Mary's Community Services. This
organization provides various community
services, including hot meals, a day center,
health services, emergency shelter, and
housing services. As of April 2024, an
emergency shelter project was entitled on this
site.
ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT POTENTIAL
California Government Code Section 65583.1(a) states
that a town, city, or county may identify sites for ADUs based on: the number of ADUs developed in the prior
housing element planning period, the need for ADUs in
the community, the resources or incentives available for their development, and any other relevant factors.
Based on recent changes in state law reducing the time
to review and approve ADU applications, requiring
ADUs that meet requirements to be allowed by right,
eliminating discretionary review for most ADUs, and
removing other restrictions on ADUs, it is anticipated
that the production of ADUs will increase in the 6thcycle housing element planning period.
The City issued building permits for 4 ADUs in 2018, 4
in 2019, 16 in 2020, 29 in 2021 and 60 in 2022,
showing a growth pattern over the last five years. This analysis assumes that the number of ADU applications
and permits will average 22.60 ADUs per year, for a
total of 180 ADUs during the planning period. Data
from 2023 supports these assumptions. The City
permitted 10 ADUs between July 23, 2023, and
October 16, 2023.
While Stockton is not in the ABAG region, ABAG’s 2021
regional analysis of existing ADU rents is a useful
starting point for affordability assumptions because
there is not the same type of study from the San Joaquin region. The ABAG analysis resulted in affordability
assumptions that allocate 30 percent of ADUs to very
low-income households, 30 percent to low-income
households, 30 percent to moderate-income
households, and 10 percent to above-moderateincome households. Next, the following local affordability analysis was considered:
• Based on the 2022 AMI for San Joaquin
County:
o A low-income household of three could
afford a monthly rent of $1,490.
o A low-income household of two could
afford a monthly rent of $1,325.
o A low-income household of one could
afford a monthly rent of $1,159.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1237
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-181
• Based on a survey of listings for rentals in
Stockton on Zillow.com in October 2022, the
average monthly rents were $1,183 for a
studio, $1,338 for a 1-bedroom, and
$1,615 for a two-bedroom.
A slightly more conservative approach is taken here than in ABAG. Instead of assuming that 30 percent of the
ADUs will be affordable to very low-income households
and 30 percent will be affordable to low-income
households, as shown in Table HE-54, Stockton is
counting 60 percent of its anticipated ADUs in the lowincome category. This is supported by the local affordability analysis above. The remaining 40 percent
are allocated as 30 percent to the moderate-income
category and 10 to the above moderate-income
category, which is identical to ABAG’s approach.
As shown in Table HE-54, of the 180 ADUs projected
to be built, it is estimated that 108 will be for lowincome households, 54 will be for moderate-income households, and 18 for above-moderate-income
households.
HAZARDS AND OTHER
POTENTIAL SITE
CONSTRAINTS
The safety element addresses the topic of public health and safety following state requirements in Section
65302(g) of the California Government Code. State law
requires that the safety element contain background
information and goals and policies to address multiple
natural hazards, analyze the vulnerabilities from climate change, contain policies to improve climate change
resilience, and assess residential areas with evacuation constraints. The Housing Element sites inventory was
screened for several hazards. The potential presence of these natural hazards is identified herein. The presence of any hazard does not automatically preclude
development. Refer to the Safety Element for mitigation measures. Other than those conditions described
herein, there are no other known environmental
constraints or conditions within the City that could
preclude development on identified sites within the
planning period, including hazards, airport
compatibility and related land use controls, shape,
contamination, easements or overlays.
CONTAMINATION
Based on the CalEPA Cortese List Data Resources site,
three contaminated sites with open cases are located in Stockton. These sites are not identified in the Housing Element as potential residential development sites, and they do not pose a constraint for the housing sites.
Stockton has no sites with cease-and-desist orders or
cleanup and abatement orders from the California
Water Board. When site remediation is needed, the City
coordinates with owners to facilitate remediation and
development.
AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY
Aircraft operations (-AIR) overlay district, Stockton
Municipal Code Chapter 16.28.030 provides height
limits for structures in the vicinity of the Stockton
Metropolitan Airport. This zone does not limit
development of anticipated units on the sites in the
Housing Element sites inventory.
LIQUEFICATION
Liquefication is a phenomenon in which the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced by earthquake shaking or other rapid loading. It is loose, water-saturated
sediments that lose durability and fail during strong
ground shaking. No sites in the inventory are at risk for liquefaction.
LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY
Landslides are the movement of a mass of rock, debris,
or earth down a slope and are induced by strong
earthquakes or heavy rain. The California Geological
Survey Map relies on regional estimates of rock strength and steepness of slopes since weak rocks and steep
slopes are most likely to generate landslides. The
California Geological Survey classifies susceptibility on a scale from 0 to 10, low to high. No sites in the
inventory are at risk for landslides.
FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY
The California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection assess fire hazard severity based on fuel
loading (vegetation), fire weather (winds, temperatures, humidity levels, and fuel moisture contents), and
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1238
BR-182 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
topography (degree of slope). No sites in the inventory are at risk for wildfire.
FLOODING
Flooding is the rising and overflowing of a body of water onto normally dry land. Floodplains are any land area
subject to inundation by floodwaters of any source. As
described in the City’s Safety Element, historically,
floods are one of the most frequent natural hazards
impacting communities in San Joaquin County,
including Stockton and can be very dangerous. As such,
the Safety Element describes the range of mitigation
measures and responses to flooding risk that the City
continues to implement. A majority of the flood risk
within Stockton is specifically subject to inundation as a result of heavy rainfall and resulting stream and
drainage canal overflows.
The map used to screen the sites for flood hazards is the Best Available Map (BAM) developed by the Department
of Water Resources (DWR). It displays potential
exposure to flooding for three different storm events:
one with storm flows that have a 1- percent chance of
being equaled or exceeded in any year (100-year), one
with storm flows that have a 0.5- percent chance of
being equaled or exceeded in any year (200-year), and
one with storms flows that have a 0.2-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any year (500-year).
According to the BAM, no sites were identified to be in a DWR 100-year Flood Zone; however, of the 614
properties in the inventory, the following was identified:
• 64 properties are in a Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year
Flood Zone
• 34 properties are in a U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) 200-year Flood Zone
• 542 properties are in a FEMA 500-year
Flood Zone
• 537 properties are in a California Division of
Safety of Dams (DSOD) Dam Inundation
Area
See Table A-1 in Appendix A for the affected parcels.
Similar conditions have not precluded the development
of other similar sites with residential units
ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC
FACILITIES AND
INFRASTRUCTURE
State law requires local governments to provide a copy
of the adopted housing element to all water and sewer
providers. In addition, water and sewer providers must
grant priority for service allocations to developments
that include units affordable to lower-income
households. The City of Stockton will comply with SB
1087, as described in Program 13. Priority Sewer and
Water Service for Affordable Housing.
This section addresses the adequacy of public facilities, services, and infrastructure to accommodate planned
residential growth through the end of the Housing
Element planning period. The following information
regarding the adequacy of public facilities and
infrastructure is based largely on information from the 2020 City of Stockton Municipal Service Review (MSR)
and 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report
(EIR).
WATER
Water systems in the Stockton Metropolitan Area use a
combination of treated surface water provided by the
Stockton East Water District and pumped groundwater
to supply water in the city. Stockton water purveyors
include the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities
Department, California Water Service Company, and
San Joaquin County Maintenance Districts.
Stockton has met and expects to be able to continue to
meet annual water demands in the city during differing
hydrologic periods with surface water, groundwater,
water conservation, and other potential water supplies, such as nonpotable supplies from local communities,
raw surface water from local irrigation districts, and
water from active groundwater storage projects. The
City’s 2035 General Plan commits the City to
maintaining existing facilities and developing new water treatment and delivery facilities. The General Plan
includes policies that ensure and require that adequate water supplies and facilities are located and maintained throughout the urbanized areas of the city to meet future growth. In addition, any costs associated with new
facilities and/or upgrades to existing facilities will be Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1239
HOUSING SITES INVENTORY BR-183
offset through the increased revenue and fees generated by future development. The City will review future
projects on an individual basis and will require
compliance with City requirements (e.g., impact fees) in effect at the time building permits are issued.
SEWER
The City’s wastewater collection and treatment facilities consist of the Stockton Regional Wastewater Control
Facility (RWCF) and the City of Stockton Wastewater
Collection System Facilities. The RWCF provides
primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater from throughout the city. According to the
City’s 2020 Municipal Service Review, the RWCF has a
permitted dry weather flow capacity of 55 million
gallons per day.
The City’s sanitary sewer collection system is divided into 10 designated subareas or “systems”. Pump stations are
located throughout the city and are integral to the
wastewater collection system. Most of the pump stations discharge to pressure sewers that convey flow under
pressure either directly to the RWCF or to a downstream gravity sewer.
The Stockton Wastewater Control Facility provides
primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater from throughout the city. The RWCF is north
of SR-4 on both sides of the San Joaquin River. The
Main Plant located on the east side of the rover provides screening, grit removal, raw sewage pumping, primary
sedimentation with chemical addition, secondary
treatment with aeration basins, secondary clarification, and secondary effluent pumping. The Tertiary Plant
includes dual-media tertiary filtration to meet Title 22 requirements, disinfection by chlorination using a
chlorine contact channel, and dichlorination before
discharging to the San Joaquin River.
The current treatment facilities will remain in service until the tertiary treatment facilities including the outfall structure are relocated to the Main Plant located on the east side of the river. Compliance date with the current NPDES permit is June 1, 2024. Phasing and timing of
additional facilities to accommodate additional growth
are discussed in the 2022 Capital Improvement and
Energy Management Plan.
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING
The City of Stockton 2040 General Plan requires new
development to pay its fair share of the costs of public facilities and utilities needed to support additional
growth. Stockton receives funds for the provision of
public services through State sources, development fees, property taxes, and connection and usage fees. The City reviews its fee structures on an annual basis to ensure that they provide adequate funding to cover the
provision of City services. The City’s standard condition of development requires preparation of a capital
improvement program for specific plans and master
plans. The City charges public utility fees per dwelling unit for residential uses. Because the City and other
service agencies have adequate fee structures and
planning processes, described above, to ensure that the fees remain sufficient to cover costs of required services, no financial constraints to service provision have been identified. The City’s policy ensures it will continue its efforts to maintain funding of existing and future public facilities and services.
The City has also received funding for capital
improvement projects from the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The City
receives subventions from the State of California, such as gas tax revenues, which are used for infrastructure
projects, and has also benefited from one-time special
allocations from the State for law enforcement and
parks capital improvement projects. The City has also
been successful in applying for a variety of infrastructure related grants.
The 2020 City of Stockton MSR found the water and
sewer capacity adequate to meet current and future
demands within the city limits. The City has adequate
water and sewer capacity to serve the sites used to meet the City’s RHNA. Future development outside the
existing city limits within the sphere of influence
boundary will require the development of new facilities.
To adequately meet future demands, new residential
developments are required to pay for the major capital
improvements to water and sewer infrastructure needed
to serve future residents.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1240
BR-184 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
This page intentionally left blank.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1241
EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAMS AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES BR-185
EXISTING HOUSING
PROGRAMS AND
FINANCIAL RESOURCES 5
INTRODUCTION
This section provides information on local housing
programs as well as local, State, and federal financial resources that are available to support the City of
Stockton’s housing programs. Because of the high cost
of new construction, more than one source of public
funds is often required to construct an affordable
housing development. The City of Stockton partners with the private sector to develop new units with the
assistance of these various funding sources. The City
also uses funds to support housing rehabilitation and
preservation of the city’s older neighborhoods, assist
first-time homebuyers, and provide various other
housing services to lower-income households.
LOCAL HOUSING
PROGRAMS
CITY OF STOCKTON
The Housing Division of the City of Stockton Economic
Development Department works closely with other
agencies to facilitate the production and preservation of affordable housing, assist in the development of suitable living environments, and expand economic
opportunities to low-income families by providing them
with financial assistance loans.
Single Family Housing Repair Loan Program
The Single-Family Housing Repair Loan program
provides financial assistance to low-income
homeowners for home repairs. Funding for the loan
program comes from CDBG, HOME, and CalHome.
The program aims to bring local housing into
compliance with California Building Code standards
and improve accessibility for homeowners. The program
guidelines are:
• Eligibility: Low-income (80 percent AMI or
lower), within city limits, owner-occupied
single-family or two units on one lot with one
of the units occupied by the eligible owner.
• Loan Term: 30 years, deferred.
• Loan Interest Rate: 1 percent simple interest.
• Other: The owner’s debt ratio may not
exceed 55 percent; the property loan-tovalue ratio (after repair) may not surpass 105 percent.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1242
BR-186 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Emergency Housing Repair Program
The Emergency Housing Repair Program provides up to
$30,000 in one-time funding for the correction of code
violations from the City, fire marshal, or health officers to low-income property owners. Funds are available on
a case-by-case basis from CalHome and CDBG funds.
The following are the program guidelines:
• Eligibility: Low-income (80 percent AMI),
owner-occupied, property within city limits.
• Loan Term: 30 years; loan forgiven after 7
years if the borrower does not sell or transfer
ownership; for senior households (60 years
and over) the loan is forgivable.
• Loan Interest Rate: Zero percent, deferred.
• Other: Property loan-to-value ratio (after
repair) may not surpass 105 percent.
Down Payment Assistance Program
The Down Payment Assistance Program uses funds from
NSP, CalHome, and HOME. The goal is to increase the
homeownership rate by helping to lessen the burden of
a down payment and closing costs for low-income
residents. The program lends up to $10,000 in
assistance (or 5 percent of the purchase price plus the closing costs) to purchase of the home, plus accessibility repairs to residences for handicapped persons. The
funds are loaned for 30 years with a simple interest rate of 3 percent for the first 15 years and zero interest for remaining 15 years.
• Eligibility: Low-income (80 percent AMI), firsttime homebuyers, must reside or be employed in the city for 12 months before
applying.
• Loan Term: 30 years; deferred; amount of up
to $10,000 or 5 percent of purchase price,
plus closing costs.
• Loan Interest Rate: 3 percent for first 15 years
and zero percent for remaining 15 years; at
end of 30-year period owe entire amount of
loan and a “balloon payment” of 5 percent
of the home’s net appreciation.
• Other: Borrowers are required to attend a
home-buyer class from a City-approved
provider.
Multifamily Projects
The City provides funds for acquisition and
predevelopment costs and for the cost of building or
renovating multifamily units. Funding comes from
HOME and CDBG. The following are the program
guidelines:
• Eligibility: Funds are awarded through NOFA
process and are project specific.
• Loan Term: Variable based on project.
• Loan Interest Rate: Variable based on project.
Fee Waivers and Reductions
Residential fee waivers/reductions are via the Greater
Downtown Stockton Residential Development Public
Facilities Fees Exemption Program and Stockton
Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP).
Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan
The SESP program provides a Public Facility Fees (PFF)
fee reduction for qualifying single-family residential, multifamily residential, commercial, and industrial
projects in Stockton.
PFF reduction amounts to the categories above are as
follows:
• Up to a total of $19,997 or 100 percent
(whichever is less) for single-family
residential.
• $14,080 per unit for multifamily residential.
• 50 percent reduction for commercial and
industrial.
Fee reductions are applied to the following PFF fee
categories:
PFF CATEGORY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL
City Office Space ✓ ✓
Libraries ✓ ✓
Fire Stations ✓ ✓
Parkland ✓
Community ✓ ✓
Recreation Centers ✓ ✓
Police Stations ✓ ✓
Street
Improvements
✓ ✓
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1243
EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAMS AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES BR-187 The fee reduction applies to single-family residential, multifamily residential, and nonresidential
(commercial/industrial) permits issued citywide for
builders/developers who comply with the terms of the
program.
To participate in the single-family residential component of SESP, a developer must comply with the local hire
and disadvantaged individual requirements. Only units
within the existing city limits are eligible to meet the local hire requirement of the program. The
commercial/industrial component, formerly the Public
Facilities Fee Reduction Program (established in 2010), was folded into the SESP program in 2015; reporting of
local hiring is not a requirement.
Greater Downtown Stockton Residential
Development Public Facilities Fees
Exemption Program
A related program the Greater Downtown Stockton
Residential Development Public Facilities Fees
Exemption Program, provides a waiver for certain PFFs
for all new residential development within the Greater
Downtown Stockton area.
Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program
The Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program provides a
financial incentive to eligible parties interested in
developing new market-rate residential, commercial, or
mixed-use projects in downtown Stockton. In Stockton’s
downtown area, aging infrastructure, such as sewer and
water lines, and the rehabilitation of older structures can significantly increase project costs and serve as barriers to infill development.
Under the Downtown Infill Infrastructure Program,
eligible development projects may receive a
reimbursement for certain public infrastructure
improvements. Examples of eligible public infrastructure improvements include sewer and water; storm drain;
street improvements, including crosswalks, bike lanes,
striping, and medians; traffic signals; streetlights; and landscaping.
To qualify for the program, the developer must meet
these criteria:
1. Develop a minimum of 35 new market-rate
residential units and/or develop a minimum of
30,000 square feet of new or newly renovated retail
or commercial space.
2. Be within the program boundary, which includes
Center Street to the west, Park Street to the north,
ACE Rail/Union Pacific Railroad to the east, and
Washington Street to the south.
3. Make a capital investment of at least $500,000.
4. Eligible public infrastructure improvements must
equal $100,000 or more.
Applicants must submit a request for funding to the
Economic Development Department for review and
consideration. If deemed eligible under the program
guidelines, a Reimbursement Agreement requiring
Council approval will be executed between the City and
applicant. The City will reimburse the applicant within six months of completion of the public improvements in
the reimbursement agreement, up to $900,000
annually. The program was approved by Council on July
7, 2015, and is scheduled to sunset in July 2025.
Neighborhood Services: Code
Enforcement
The Neighborhood Services Section of the Stockton
Police Department enforces codes, laws, and
regulations for the abatement of substandard housing
conditions and zoning violations; blight issues; and the abatement of abandoned, dismantled, or inoperative
vehicles.
Since 2004, code enforcement has become a more
important facet of the City’s operations. Many of the
problems the City faced in the past have become more
manageable because of public awareness and
understanding of what can be done to fix the problems.
Additional resources and programs have also been
made available to aid rehabilitation and renovation.
Stockton Code Enforcement operates primarily on a
complaint basis. Once a code enforcement officer
(CEO) verifies a complaint, a Violation Warning Notice
is prepared and posted on the property and sent in the
mail to the occupant and property owner (if different).
The Violation Warning Notice notes the violations found and gives a deadline for correcting the violations. If the occupant/owner does not comply, various
administrative tools are available, including fees, fines, abatement, and civil penalties. The CEOs make every
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1244
BR-188 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
effort to work with property owners and tenants and
assist whenever possible. The response to the City’s
approach and case processing procedures has been
positive. Approximately 30 percent of cases are closed
after the first Violation Warning Notice, and the number of administrative fines has declined in the past few years.
The most common housing violations are deferred
maintenance issues like plumbing leaks,
worn/deteriorated materials, and lack of weather
protection. Others include structural problems, raw
sewage, exposed wiring, and other exterior housing
problems. The majority of housing cases usually take a
minimum of 45 days to resolve, depending on the
amount and severity of the violations. The potential
contributors to code violations include the volume of
rental housing and the structural age of many buildings in the city. The majority of the violations involve
multifamily dwellings. Rental property owners, especially those not in the area, find it difficult to maintain their properties and monitor their tenants on a regular basis.
In the downtown and midtown areas, many of the
buildings are among the first built when Stockton
became a city in 1851. Although they have been
maintained to some extent, many have serious structural problems that are difficult and costly to fix.
FORMER STOCKTON
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
California law eliminated redevelopment agencies
throughout the state in February 2012. The law,
Assembly Bill X1 26, required the establishment of
successor agencies to take over the remaining vestiges
of redevelopment. Additionally, in June 2012 Governor
Brown signed Assembly Bill 1484 (AB 1484). One of
the key components of AB 1484 was the requirement
that all successor agencies develop a long-range
property management plan that governs the disposition
and use of former nonhousing redevelopment agency
properties. In August 2011 the City of Stockton passed
a resolution stating it would serve as the successor
agency to the Stockton Redevelopment Agency and the
City would assume the redevelopment agency’s housing
functions. In April 2012 the City established the
Stockton Successor Agency Oversight Board to direct
and approve functions of the successor agency. As the
successor agency, the City oversees bond proceeds of
the former redevelopment agency.
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAN
JOAQUIN COUNTY
The Housing Authority of San Joaquin County has
several programs to assist low- and moderate-income
households with housing costs, including the Housing
Choice Vouchers Program, public housing, and migrant
farmworker housing. The Public Housing Program
provides rental assistance at four main sites (two in
Stockton, one in Tracy, and one in Thornton). Through
the Migrant Program the Housing Authority manages
two migrant farm labor housing developments in
unincorporated areas of the county. In addition, the San Joaquin Housing Authority provides the Family SelfSufficiency Program, supportive services centers, and the Resident Construction Program.
Housing Choice Vouchers Program
The San Joaquin Housing Authority manages the
Housing Choice Vouchers Program (Section 8) for all of
San Joaquin County. The program offers a voucher that
pays the difference between the current fair market rent and what a tenant can afford to pay (e.g., 30 percent of their income). The voucher allows a tenant to choose
housing that may cost above the payment standard, but
the tenant must pay the extra cost. As of 2022, 3,639
households in Stockton received rental assistance
through the Housing Choice Vouchers Program.
Public Housing
The San Joaquin Housing Authority provides public
housing at the four main locations shown in Table HE54. Two of the housing developments are in Stockton— Conway Homes and Sierra Vista Homes. Both
developments provide single-family homes at rents
affordable to low-income households. In addition, the
Authority owns and manages four market-rate
properties: West Park Street Apartments, Washington
Avenue Apartments, Mourfield Avenue Apartments, and
Claremont Manor Apartments.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1245
EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAMS AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES BR-189 Table HE-54: San Joaquin Housing Authority Public Housing San Joaquin County, 2023
NAME OF DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS DESCRIPTION
Conway Homes 741 S. Flint Avenue
Stockton, CA. 436 single- family dwelling units ranging from 1 to 5 bedrooms Sierra Vista Homes 2436 S. Belleview Street
Stockton, CA 391 single- family dwelling units ranging from 1 to 5 bedroom units Tracy Homes 340 W. Fourth Street
Tracy, CA 195 single- family dwelling units ranging from 1 to 5 bedrooms Mokelumne Manor 26188 N. Manor Drive
Thornton, CA
50 single-story duplexes ranging from 1 to 4 bedrooms, each equipped with a private backyard
Source: San Joaquin Housing Authority, October 2022.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1246
BR-190 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Federal and State Funding
Table HE-55 lists federal and state funding sources that the City could apply for by itself or with partners.
Table HE-55: Financial Resources for Housing Activities
PROGRAM NAME DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Federal Programs
Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG)
Grants available to the County on a competitive basis for a variety of housing and community development activities. County competes for funds through the State’s application process.
- Acquisition
- Rehabilitation
- Home Buyer Assistance
- Economic Development
- Homeless Assistance
- Public Services
Housing Choice Voucher
Program (Section 8)
Assistance program that provides direct funding for rental subsidies for very low-income families. - Rental Assistance
Home Investment Partnership
Program (HOME)
Grants available to the County on a competitive basis for a variety of housing activities.
County competes for funds through the State’s application process. - Home Buyer Assistance
- Rehabilitation
- New Construction
- Rental Assistance
Section 202 Grants to private nonprofit developers of supportive housing for very low-income seniors. - New Construction Housing Rehabilitation Program Provides financial assistance to low-income homeowners for health and safety improvements. - Rehabilitation
Emergency Shelter Grants Competitive grants to help local governments and nonprofits finance emergency shelters, transitional housing, and other supportive services.
- New Construction
- Rehabilitation
- Homeless Assistance
- Public Services
Continuum of Care/Homeless
Emergency Assistance and Rapid
Transition to Housing (HEARTH)
Funding through the HEARTH Act of 2009 to provide necessary resources for development of programs to assist homeless individuals and families.
- Homeless Assistance
- New Construction
Housing Opportunities for
Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
The HOPWA program provides housing assistance and supportive services for low-income people with HIV/AIDS and their families. - Rental Assistance State Programs
Local Housing Trust Fund
Matching Grant Program
Provides matching grants to local housing trust funds that are funded on an ongoing basis from private contributions or public sources that are not otherwise restricted in use for housing programs.
- New Construction
- Homebuyer Assistance
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1247
EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAMS AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES BR-191
PROGRAM NAME DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Single-Family Housing Bond
Program (Mortgage Revenue
Bonds)
Bonds issued to local lenders and developers so that below-market interest rate loans can be issued to first-time homebuyers. - Homebuyer Assistance Mortgage Credit Certificates
(MCC)
Provides qualified first-time homebuyers with a federal income tax credit that reduces the borrower’s federal tax liability, providing additional income, which can be used for mortgage payments.
- Homebuyer Assistance
Prop 63 Mental Health Services
Act Funds
Funding for capital improvements and operating subsidies for supportive housing for formerly homeless or at-risk individuals with mental disabilities. - Special-Needs Programs
- New Construction
CalHome Program Grants awarded to jurisdictions for owner-occupied housing rehabilitation and first-time homebuyer assistance.
- Homebuyer Assistance
- Rehabilitation
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
(LIHTC) A 4 percent annual tax credit that helps owners of rental units develop affordable housing. - Construction of Housing Affordable Housing Partnership
Program (AHPP)
Provides lower-interest-rate California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) loans to homebuyers who receive local secondary financing. - Homebuyer Assistance Permanent Local Housing
Allocation (PLHA)
PLHA provides a permanent source of funding for all local governments in California to help cities and counties implement plans to increase the affordable housing stock. The two types of assistance are: formula grants to entitlement and nonentitlement jurisdictions, and competitive grants to nonentitlement jurisdictions.
- Predevelopment
- Development
- Acquisition
- Rehabilitation
- Preservation
- Matching Funds
- Homelessness Assistance
- Accessibility Modifications
- Homeownership Assistance
- Fiscal Incentives
Local Early Action Planning
(LEAP) Grants
The LEAP grants provide over-the-counter grants complemented with technical assistance to local governments for the preparation and adoption of planning documents and for process improvements that accelerate housing production.
Facilitate compliance to implement the sixth-cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment. - Housing Element Updates
- Updates to Zoning, Plans, or Procedures to
Increase or Accelerate Housing Production
- Preapproved Architectural and Site Plans
- Establishing State-Defined Pro-housing Policies
- See Complete List in Program Materials
Senate Bill 2 Technical
Assistance Grants
Financial and technical assistance to local governments to update planning documents and the development code to streamline housing production, including, but not limited to, general plans, community plans, specific plans, implementation of sustainable communities’ strategies, and local coastal programs.
- Technical Assistance
- Planning Document Updates
Housing and Disability Advocacy
Program (HDAP)
Services to assist disabled individuals who are experiencing homelessness apply for disability benefit programs while also providing housing assistance. HDAP has four core requirements:
outreach, case management, disability advocacy, and housing assistance. - Rental Assistance
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1248
BR-192 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM NAME DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
No Place Like Home Loans to counties or developers in counties for permanent supportive housing for those with mental illness who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. - New Construction Homeless Emergency Aid
Program (HEAP)
A block grant program designed to provide direct assistance to cities, counties, and continuums of care to address the homelessness crisis throughout California. - Identified Homelessness Needs
- Capital Improvements Related to Homelessness
- Rental Assistance
California Emergency Solutions
and Housing (CESH)
Provides funds for activities to assist persons experiencing or at risk of homelessness.
Program funds are granted in the form of five-year grants to eligible applicants. - Homelessness Service System Administration
- New Construction
- Rental Assistance
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1249
EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAMS AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES BR-193
PRIVATE FUNDING
The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 directs the
Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the
Federal Home Loan Bank Board to encourage and
assist the institutions they regulate to meet the credit needs of their communities. These agencies must assess
the records of their member institutions when evaluating applications for a charter or other regulated
transactions. As a result of this Act, many major financial institutions have elected to actively participate in funding low- and moderate-income housing developments
developed by nonprofit corporations.
The Federal Home Loan Bank provides direct project
financing through its member institutions as part of its Affordable Housing Program. The Savings Associations
Mortgage Company, which is an organization of
savings institutions, also provides financing for
affordable housing developments. The California
Community Reinvestment Corporation was formed to
pool the resources of the state's banks to assist in
financing affordable housing. Finally, the Federal
National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) provides
permanent financing for affordable housing
development by purchasing or securitizing the lenderoriginated first mortgages on mutually agreeable terms.
ENERGY
CONSERVATION
OPPORTUNITIES
State housing element law requires an analysis of the
opportunities for energy conservation in residential
development. Energy efficiency has direct application to affordable housing because the more money spent on
energy, the less available for rent or mortgage
payments. High energy costs have particularly
detrimental effects on low-income households that do
not have enough income or cash reserves to absorb cost
increases and many times must choose between basic
needs such as shelter, food, and energy.
LOCAL ENERGY PROGRAMS
The City of Stockton provides a number of programs to
encourage energy efficiency.
• Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)
Programs. The City of Stockton provides a
variety of programs for property owners to
finance infrastructure improvements for
renewable energy technology purchase and
installation, energy and water efficiency
improvements, and electric vehicle charging.
• The Green-Up Stockton Ordinance. The
Stockton City Council adopted the Green-Up
Stockton Ordinance (Ordinance 005‐11
C.S.) in March 2011 to encourage voluntary
residential energy efficiency assessments and
retrofits for existing dwelling units. The goal
of the ordinance is to provide energy retrofits
to 8,500 homes, nearly 10 percent of
Stockton’s housing stock, and reduce energy
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
by 25 percent for the retrofitted dwelling
units.
• Stockton Rising. Stockton Rising is a City-led
program aiming to improve the environment
and climate resilience of neighborhoods most
impacted by climate change. The City, along
with 11 partners, is implementing projects
that will directly benefit residents in South
Stockton. Stockton Rising is supported by the
California Strategic Growth Council's
Transformative Climate Communities
Program with funds from California Climate
Investments’ Cap-and-Trade Dollars at
Work. Stockton Rising offers several no-cost
programs for residents in the Transformative
Climate Communities Project Area. These
programs include solar installation and
energy- and water-efficiency upgrades, as
well as a tree planting program.
NEW RESIDENTIAL ENERGY
STANDARDS
All new buildings in California must meet the standards in Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations (Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings). These regulations respond to California's energy crisis and the need to reduce energy bills, increase energy delivery system reliability, and contribute to an improved economic condition for the
state. They were established in 1978 and most recently
updated in 2021. Through the building permit process,
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1250
BR-194 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
local governments enforce energy efficiency
requirements. All new construction must comply with the standards in effect on the date a building-permit
application is submitted. The City of Stockton’s Building Department enforces Title 24 standards through its
building permit process.
In addition to Title 24 requirements, the City’s housing rehabilitation programs include requirements for the
installation of water- and energy-efficient
improvements, and the Housing Division supports lowand moderate-income residents with implementation of green building practices.
SUBDIVISION DESIGN FOR HEATING
OR COOLING OPPORTUNITIES
Section 66473.1 of the State Subdivision Map Act
requires that the "design of a subdivision for which a
tentative map is required shall provide, to the extent
feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision." Although this section does not contain any precise standards, the State
Attorney General has opined that "a tentative map of a
subdivision must be disproved if it fails to meet the
design requirement of Government Code Section
66473.1."
In accordance with the provisions of the California
Subdivision Map Act, Section 16.72.250 of Stockton’s
Municipal Code states that the City may require a
subdivider to “provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivisions, in compliance with Map Act Section
66473.1, including orientation of a structure for southern exposure, shade, or prevailing winds.”
WEATHERIZATION ACTIVITIES
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) provides natural gas
and electric services for the city of Stockton. PG&E offer a variety of programs to increase energy conservation
and reduce monthly energy costs for lower-income
households. The following programs, offered by PG&E,
are aimed at increasing energy efficiency and are
available to PG&E customers in Stockton.
• Multifamily Energy Savings Program. The
Multifamily Energy Savings Program offers
energy-saving opportunities, including nocost energy assessment and project consulting and rebates for energy-saving
upgrades. Eligible properties include
attached residences with five or more units.
• Energy Savings Assistance Program. The
Energy Savings Assistance Program provides
energy-savings improvements to qualified
low-income households at no charge. The
energy-savings improvements increase
energy efficiency of a home to decrease
energy bills.
San Joaquin County Human Services Agency offers a
weatherization program that provides energy-saving
measures and repairs to homes, apartments, and
mobile homes. These dwellings qualify for
weatherization measures if the household income does
not exceed a limit determined by the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services. Some of the energysaving measures available include repair or replacement of refrigerators, stoves, water heaters, and microwaves; insulation; minor home repair; LED light
bulbs; smoke and carbon monoxide detectors; shade
screens; and weather-stripping.
In addition to the local programs described above, the
California Department of Community Services and
Development administers the federally funded LowIncome Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). This program provides two types of assistance—
Weatherization Program and Energy Crisis Intervention
Program. The Weatherization Program provides free
weatherization improvement services to increase energy
efficiency, such as attic insulation, caulking, water
heater blankets, and heating and cooling system repairs to low-income households. The Energy Crisis
Intervention Program provides assistance to low-income
households that are in a crisis situation, such as
receiving a 24 to 48 hour disconnect notice or service
termination from their utility company.
Finally, the U.S. Department of Energy provides
weatherization grants to homeowners similar to those
offered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Human
Services. The federal funds for the weatherization
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1251
EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAMS AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES BR-195 program are provided through the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act Weatherization Assistance
Program. The Department of Community Services and
Development implements the program at the state level.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1252
BR-196 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
This page intentionally left blank.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1253
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-197
POTENTIAL HOUSING
CONSTRAINTS 6
MAJOR FINDINGS
• Based on analysis of the permitted densities and
development standards, the City has found that
the General Plan and Development Code
facilitate a variety of housing types. The City
allows residential development in nonresidential
and mixed-use zones and permits densities as
high as 136 units per acre in the downtown
area.
• The City applies more flexible development
standards for infill projects to encourage and
maximize opportunities for development of
vacant and underutilized land within city limits.
In 2022, the City adopted a code amendment
to allow Density Waivers for Small Infill Lots. The
development standards of the underlying zoning
designation, such as the density, setbacks,
height, site coverage, and parking requirements,
may be modified to create consistency with
surrounding development and address physical
site constraints.
• Overall, the City’s parking standards are
relatively low, both for downtown infill
development and development outside the
downtown. Parking standards do not represent a
constraint to the development of housing and
allow development to achieve maximum
allowed densities. The City has also reduced or
eliminated parking for housing developments,
including transit-oriented developments (TOD),
affordable housing, senior housing, small lots,
etc.
• Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are allowed by
right and go straight to a building permit, unless
they are located in a Design District.
• The City of Stockton’s Development Code
defines supportive housing as a “use by right.”
Therefore, supportive housing is allowed in the
city wherever single-family and multifamily
residential is allowed. The City’s code does not
constrain development of supportive housing.
• A low-barrier navigation center development is
a use by right in special purpose or commercial
zoning districts permitting multifamily dwellings.
• The City has acquired hotels to create a mixed
income development, such as the Medici Artist
Lofts. There is a mix of one-, two-, and threebedroom apartments. Of the 34 units, 27 are affordable housing units for families with income
levels between 30-60 percent area median
income. Six of the units are market rate.
INTRODUCTION
State housing law requires the City to review both
governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the
maintenance and production of housing for all income
levels. Since local governmental actions can restrict the development and increase the cost of housing, State law Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1254
BR-198 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
requires the Housing Element to “address and, where
appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental
constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and
development of housing” (Government Code Section
65583(c)(3)).
The City is currently conducting a comprehensive update to its Development Code which is expected to be complete by the end of 2023. In addition, the City is preparing a Housing Action Plan and Neighborhood Actions Plans for
three specific areas of the city. All of these efforts will address housing needs in the city. Policies and programs related to these efforts are included in the main element section of this document.
POTENTIAL
GOVERNMENTAL
CONSTRAINTS
Local governments have little or no influence on the
national economy or the federal monetary policies that
influence it. Yet these two factors have some of the most significant impacts on the overall cost of housing. The local housing market, however, can be encouraged and
assisted locally. One purpose of the housing element is to require local governments to evaluate their past
performance in this regard. By reviewing local conditions and regulations that may impact the development of the
housing market, the local government can prepare for
future growth through actions that protect the public’s health and safety without unduly adding to the cost of
housing production. Consistent with transparency
requirements (Government Code Section 65940.1
subdivisions (a)(1)(A)) and (a)(1)(B)), the City’s zoning, development standards, and fees are available on the
City’s website.
LAND USE CONTROLS
By definition, local land use controls constrain housing development by restricting housing to certain areas of the city and by restricting the number of housing units that can be built on a given parcel of land. The 2040 General Plan sets forth the City’s policies regarding local land
development. These policies, together with zoning
regulations, establish the amount and distribution of land allocated for different uses.
General Plan Land Use Designations
The City of Stockton 2040 General Plan establishes land use designations for all land within the city boundaries.
These land use designations specify the type of
development the City will permit. The 2040 General Plan includes eight designations that permit a range of
residential development types and densities (see Table HE56): Residential Estate (RE), Low Density Residential (LDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density
Residential (HDR), Administrative Professional (AP),
Commercial (C), Open Space and Agriculture (OSA), and
Mixed Use (MU). The General Plan allows flexibility by
allowing residential uses in a variety of nonresidential designations. Table HE-56 shows the General Plan
designations that permit residential developments.
For the higher-density designations (HDR, AP, and C),
maximum densities differ depending on the location.
Development in the downtown is allowed at densities up
to 136 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), while higherdensity areas outside of the downtown have a maximum density of 30 du/ac.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1255
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-199
Table HE-56: General Plan Land Use Designations Allowing Residential Uses Stockton, 2022
LU
DESIGNATION CODE USES
MAXIMUM NET
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
(DU/AC)
CONSISTENT
ZONING DISTRICTS
Residential Estates RE
Single-family residential units, public and quasipublic uses, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and other similar compatible uses.
1 RE
Low Density
Residential LDR
Single-family residential units, duplexes,
triplexes, semi-detached patio homes, town
homes, public and quasi-public uses, accessory
dwelling units (ADUs), and other similar and
compatible uses.
8.7 RL
Medium Density
Residential MDR
Single-family residential units, duplexes,
triplexes, semi-detached patio homes, town
homes, public and quasi-public uses, accessory
dwelling units (ADUs, and other similar and
compatible uses.
17.4 RM
High Density
Residential HDR
Multifamily residential units, apartments,
dormitories, group homes, guest homes, public
and quasi-public uses, and other similar and
compatible uses.
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 inside Downtown Core
RH
Administrative
Professional AP
Business, medical, and professional offices,
residential uses, public and quasi-public uses,
and other similar and compatible uses. This
designation is appropriate on the borders of
residential areas.
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 inside Downtown Core
CO, UC, RH
Commercial C
A wide variety of retail, service, and commercial
recreational uses, business, medical and
professional offices, residential uses, public and
quasi-public uses, and other similar and
compatible uses. Community or regional
commercial centers as well as freestanding
commercial establishments are permitted.
30 outside downtown;
90 downtown;
136 inside Downtown Core
CN, CG, CD, CL, CA,
HDR
Open Space/
Agriculture OSA
Agriculture, parks, single-family residential
units, farmworker housing, wetlands, wildlife
reserves, and other similar and compatible uses
and structures related to the primary use of the
property for preservation of natural resources or
agriculture. Lands under this designation are
intended to remain unincorporated and under
the jurisdiction of San Joaquin County.
1 du/parcel
(40-acre minimum parcel size)
FAR 0.01
OS
Mixed Use MU
A mixture of compatible land uses, including
residential, administrative and professional
offices, retail and service uses, industrial, and
public and quasi-public facilities to be
determined through a Master Development
Plan adapted concurrently with the designation
of the property as MX.
30 MX
Source: Stockton General Plan 2040, 2022.
Zoning
The City regulates the type, location, and scale of
residential development primarily through its Development Code (Title 16 of the Stockton Municipal Code). Table HE57 lists and describes the zoning districts that allow residential development. The Stockton Development Code
explicitly states the permitted maximum residential density for each zoning district, including residential zones,
commercial zones, and other zones. These density
standards are consistent with the standards in the General Plan.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1256
BR-200 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Table HE-57: Zoning Districts Allowing Residential Uses Stockton, 2022
ZONING
DISTRICTS CODE ZONE DESCRIPTION MIN. TOTAL LOT AREA
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
RANGE
Residential Estates RE
Applied to single-family residential development on large lots. It is intended to provide a transition from rural to urban areas on the urban fringe.
1 acre 1 per lot
Residential Low
Density RL
Applied to single-family residential neighborhoods, lowdensity residential Planned Developments, and/or other low-density residential development, and is intended to maintain densities and protect existing neighborhood
character.
5,000 SF1 0 to 8.7 du/acre
Residential
Medium Density RM
Applied to more intensely developed residential
neighborhoods and/or other medium-density residential
Planned Developments. Allowable housing types may
include single-family independent dwelling units,
duplexes, triplexes, townhouses, and multifamily units. 5,000 SF 8.8 to 17.4 du/acre
Residential High
Density RH
Applied to high-density residential neighborhoods.
Allowable housing types may include multifamily and
various types of group housing, as well as high-density, single-family residential development.
7,500 SF
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 Inside Downtown Core
Commercial
Office CO
Intended to be a transitional area between residential and general commercial uses. The primary uses in this district include offices, incidental retail, residential, and/or residential in conjunction with an office, and other
compatible uses.
7,500 SF
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 Inside Downtown Core
Commercial
Large-Scale CL
Applied to areas appropriate for large-scale integrated commercial retail centers with shared parking facilities.
The CL zoning district is intended to serve a regional
market area, and is to be applied to sites of at least 25 acres.
None
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 Inside Downtown Core
Commercial
Neighborhood CN
Applied to small-scale, limited retail and service areas that are designed to provide for the daily needs of the residents of the immediate, surrounding neighborhood.
None
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 Inside Downtown Core
Commercial
General CG
Applied to areas appropriate for a wide variety of general commercial uses, including retail, personal and business services; commercial recreational uses; and a mix of
office, commercial, and/or residential uses.
None
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 Inside Downtown Core
Commercial
Downtown CD
Applied to the downtown commercial area of the city. The intent of the CD zoning district is to encourage a mix of high-intensity uses to create a lively, pedestrian-friendly environment, with high visual quality. Appropriate uses include large-scale commercial offices and office support uses, high-density residential development, tourist and lodging-oriented uses, and governmental facilities.
None
30 outside downtown;
90 inside greater downtown;
136 Inside Downtown Core
Public Facilities PF
Applied to areas appropriate for a variety of public and quasi-public land uses, including facilities and lands
owned by the City, County, State, or Federal
Governments.
None FAR 0.2
Mixed Use MX
Intended to apply to large properties of at least 100 acres that can accommodate a wide range of land uses. A
Master Development Plan is required for each MX zoning
district to identify specific allowable land uses and
development regulations.
Per Master
Development
Plan
17.5 to 30 du/ac
University/
College UC
Applied to areas of the city that are dedicated to private institutions of higher learning, to enable campus
modifications or changes with the minimum, appropriate
land use regulations. A Master Development Plan is
required for each UC zoning district to identify specific allowable land uses and development regulations.
Per Master
Development
Plan
FAR 0.5 outside the Greater
Downtown;
5.0 inside the Greater
Downtown Area
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1257
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-201
ZONING
DISTRICTS CODE ZONE DESCRIPTION MIN. TOTAL LOT AREA
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
RANGE
Open Space/
Agriculture OSA
Agriculture, parks, single-family residential units,
farmworker housing, wetlands, wildlife reserves and other similar and compatible uses and structures related to the primary use of the property for preservation of natural resources or agriculture. Lands under this designation are intended to remain unincorporated and under the
jurisdiction of San Joaquin County.
40 acres
FAR 0.01
1 du/parcel
Note:
110,000 square feet for duplexes
Source: City of Stockton, Development Code, 2022.
Table HE-58 shows which land use permit is required for different types of housing in zones allowing residential uses. If a housing type is allowable in a particular zone, the use is subject to one of the following land use permit requirements:
• Permitted (P). All land uses shown with a “P” in
the table are allowed subject to compliance with
all applicable provisions of the Development
Code. Site Plan Review is required for new
construction, for a change in use, or change to
a more intensive use, except for those uses that
are exempt. Exempt uses include accessory
dwelling units, single-family residential, duplex
units, triplex units, development projects entitled
through a different permit process and minor
improvements such as fences and other exterior
improvements.
• Land Development Permit (L). All land uses
shown as "L" in the table that require construction
of new structures or improvements, the
expansion of an existing facility, or a change to
a more intensive use, as determined by the
director, require the approval of a Land
Development Permit.
• Administrative Use Permit (A). All land uses
shown with an “A” in the table are allowed
subject to the approval of an Administrative Use
Permit. The director has the decision-making
authority to approve an administrative use
permit.
• Commission Use Permit (C). All land uses shown
with a “C” in the table are allowed subject to the
approval of a Commission Use Permit. The
Planning Commission has the decision-making
authority to approve a Commission Use Permit.
• Empty Box = Use not Allowed
To address this type of request in 2022, the City adopted a code amendment to allow Density Waivers for Small Infill Lots. This process is described in Section 16.52.030(A)(b) of the Development Code as follows:
a. Density. Density may be reduced or increased at
the discretion of the Director only under the
following circumstances:
i. The decrease or increase is less than 25
percent of the required minimum or
maximum density for the zoning district;
ii. The decrease or increase is compatible with
existing development; and
iii. The decrease or increase will further the aims
of this chapter, or as allowed under the
density bonus provisions in compliance with
Chapter 16.40 (Affordable Housing
Incentives/
Density Bonus Provisions).
The development standards, including setback, lot
coverage, and maximum height requirements for zones
that allow residential development are shown in Table HE59.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1258
BR-202 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Table HE-58: Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Residential Uses Stockton, 2022
RESIDENTIAL USE TYPE
PERMIT REQUIRED BY ZONING DISTRICT
RE RL RM RH CO CN CG CD CL CA IL IG PT PF OS
Caretaker and Employee
Housing
A P P P P P P P L L L L
Duplexes P P P P L
Cottage Court C P P P P L
Mobile Home Parks A A A A A
Mobile Home/
Manufactured Home1 P P P P P L
Multifamily Dwellings P P P P P P C L
Co-living (dwelling unit
facility)2 A A A A A
Organizational House A A A A
Assisted Living Facilities A C P P P P P L
Care Homes, 6 or Fewer
Clients3
- P P P P P
Family Care Homes, 7 or
More Clients3 C C C L
Senior Care Facilities, 7 or
More Clients A A A A L
Rooming and Boarding
Houses A A L
Senior Residential Projects P P P P P P P L
Accessory Dwelling Units P P P P P P P P P P P
Single Family Dwellings P P P P P L
Townhouses A P P P P P P L
Triplexes P P P A L
Fourplexes P P P A
Emergency Shelters C C C C A A A
Low Barrier Navigation
Center4 P P P P P P P
Supportive Housing P P P P P P P P C P
Transitional Housing P P P P P P P P C P
Notes: P = permitted use; L= land development permit required; C = commission use permit required; A= administrative use permit required; empty box= use not allowed
1 A mobile home on a permanent foundation is treated as a single-family dwelling. 2A permanent housing facility consisting of single-room occupancy units, where each bedroom is considered a separate living quarter to be occupied by permanent residents.
3 Care homes include adult residential facilities, adult day care facilities, day treatment facilities, foster family homes, group homes, residential care facilities, small family homes, social care facilities, social rehabilitation facilities, community treatment facilities, intermediate care facilities, convalescent homes and nursing homes, pediatric day health and respite care facilities, intermediate care facilities for the developmentally disabled and congregate living health facilities, guest homes and rest homes.
Family Care Homes include adult residential facilities, adult day care facilities, day treatment facilities, group homes, residential care facilities, facilities for wards of the court, and residential care facilities for AIDS patients, intermediate care facilities convalescent homes and nursing homes, intermediate care facilities for the developmentally disabled and congregate living health facilities. 4Per Stockton Development Code Section 16.20.020 A low-barrier navigation center development is a use by right in special purpose or commercial zoning districts permitting multifamily dwellings.
Source: City of Stockton Development Code, Division 2, Chapter 16.20.020, 2015: Allowable Land Uses and Permit Requirements; 2022.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1259
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-203
Table HE-59: Development Standards in Zones That Allow Residential Development Stockton, 2022
ZONE MAX. NET RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY (DU/AC) FAR FRONT SETBACK
LOT
WIDTH
MIN. SIDE
SETBACK3
MIN. SIDE
SETBACK
FROM
STREET
MIN.
REAR
SETBACK
MAX. LOT
COVERAGE
(%)
MIN.
LOT
AREA
MAX.
HEIGHT4
RE 0 to 1 - 30 ft 150 ft 10 ft
10 ft
30 ft 25% 1 ac
35 ft
RL 0 to 8.7 - 20 ft
50 ft 5 ft
10 ft
50%
5,000 sf
RM 8.8 to 17.4 0.3 15 ft
RH
17.5 to 30 outside Greater
Downtown
20 to 90 inside Greater
Downtown
20 to 136 inside Downtown
Core
0.3 outside Greater
Downtown
3.0 inside Greater
Downtown
5.0 inside Downtown Core
15 ft 7,500 sf
CO 17.5 to 30 outside Greater
Downtown
20 to 90 inside Greater
Downtown
20 to 136 inside Downtown
Core
0.3 outside Greater
Downtown
3.0 inside Greater
Downtown
5.0 inside Downtown Core
10 ft 5 ft 60% 7,500 sf 45 ft
CN None1
No
Minimum
N/A2
None1
None2
100%
No
Minimum
35 ft
CG 10 ft 10 ft 60% 45 ft
CD None None 100% No Limit
CL - -
10 ft 10 ft
50%
75 ft
CA - - 45 ft
IL - 0.6
60%
60 ft
IG - 0.6
No Limit
PT - 0.5 – 0.6
OS - 0.01 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 5 acres 35 ft
PF 0.5 – 0.6 10 ft N/A2 10 N/A3 50% No
Minimum 75 ft
MX 17.5 – 30 0.5
Per master
development
Per master
development
Per master
development
Per master
development
Per master
development
Per master
development
Per
master
development
Per
master
development
UC -
0.5 Outside Greater
Downtown
5.0 Inside Greater
Downtown
1 If adjacent to residential zoning districts, the setback shall be none if the structure in the CN zoning district is at least 20 feet from the residential zoning district, otherwise the setback shall be 10 feet. 2 None required, except when adjacent to a residential zone, structures shall be set back a distance of 10 feet or as required by Article 3 for specific land uses. In the CA zone, structures shall be set back from a residential zone equal to their height.
3 Per Program 17, interior side setbacks in the CO zone will be decreased to 0’ and in the CO zone, when adjacent to residential, increased from 5 to 10 feet. 4 Per Program 17, allowed heights will increase to 60’ with a CUP in the CO zone (45’ without a CUP will not change), 45’ in the CN and RH zones and, 75’ in the CG zone.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1260
BR-204 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Infill Development Standards
The City applies more flexible development standards for infill projects to encourage and maximize opportunities for development of vacant or underutilized land within city limits. Section 16.52.030 of the Development Code
contains the infill development standards. The
development standards of the underlying zoning
designation, such as the density, setbacks, height, site coverage, and parking requirements may be modified to
create consistency with surrounding development and
address physical site constraints.
If an applicant wanted to obtain flexibility in development standards on an infill parcel, the applicant would first visit the Permit Center to determine whether or not the project met the following criteria:
A. Vacant and developed property, with or without
existing structures, of less than a total of five
acres, which consist of:
a. One legal lot; or
b. Two or more contiguous, commonly-owned
legal lots that are not separated by a public
street;
B. Bounded on at least three sides by existing urban
uses or development;
C. Served by existing water, sewer, drainage, streets,
and schools; and
D. Qualify for categorical exemption under the
California Environmental Quality Act, Section
15332, CEQA, Class 32.
In addition to the land uses allowed in Table HE-60, infill projects consisting of the land uses shown in the table are allowed in any zoning district subject to the permit
requirements shown in Table HE-60.
The City offers a preliminary project review process
(Economic Review Committee, or ERC) in which
developers are given the opportunity to meet with
representatives from the City’s various permitting
departments (e.g., Community Development, Public
Works, and Municipal Utilities) to provide feedback on
proposed site plans, as well as information on topics such as zoning, use permits, and public improvements to assist the developer in the permitting and development process.
The ERC preliminary project review process is provided
free of charge by the City.
Table HE-60: Allowable Land Uses and
Permit Requirements for Residential Infill
Projects
Stockton, 2022
RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES PERMIT
REQUIREMENT
Single-family homes on blockfaces in which
at least 50% of the blockface is occupied by
existing single-family homes
P
Single-family homes on blockfaces in which
less than 50% of the blockface is occupied
by existing single-family homes, except that
single-family homes shall not be allowed in
an Industrial zoning district or in an area
designated as Industrial on the General
Plan.
A
Duplexes and Triplexes A
Townhouses A
Multifamily A
Live Work Space P
Studios A
Notes: P = permitted use; C = commission use permit required; A= administrative use permit required; empty box= use not allowed Source: City of Stockton Development Code, Division 2, Section
16.52.050: Allowable Land Uses and Permit Requirements for Infill Projects; September 2022.
Cumulative Impact of Development
Standards
As shown in Table HE-61. Development Scenarios, The
City evaluated the cumulative impact of its land use
controls on the cost and supply of housing, including
development standards that limit sites’ building envelope (setbacks, private open space, and parking) and lot
coverage restrictions. Based on this evaluation, none of the land use controls in conventional residential zoning districts would prevent an applicant from reaching the
maximum density allowed for single-family development in single family-zones and multifamily developments in all zones where multifamily is allowed, or otherwise constrain housing development. Current development standards for
the residential zones that permit multifamily housing were applied to sites of varying size listed in Table A-1 Sites Inventory.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1261
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-205
The maximum allowed density in the RM zone is 17.4 units per gross acre. Maximum allowable densities in the RH,
CD, CG, CO, CL and CN zones are identical to each
other and dictated by geographic location (Areas): up to 136 units per gross acre within the Downtown Core; up to 90 units per gross acre within the Greater Downtown
boundary; and up to 30 units per gross acre outside the Greater Downtown boundary. Density bonus units are not
factored into the calculations.
The minimum open space requirement for parcels in the
RM and RH zones is 100 square feet per unit (minimum
40 square feet of private open space per unit). The private open space requirements for the CD, CG, CO, and CN
zones are also dictated by geographic location, increasing from 50 to 75 to 100 square feet per unit as you move
out from the Downtown Core. Other development
standards for each zone are consistent regardless of Area, meaning that, excluding density, the standards for a parcel zoned CN within the Downtown Core are the same as
those for a CN-zoned parcel outside the Greater
Downtown boundary.
The minimum parking requirement for parcels in the RM
zone is 1.2 spaces per unit. Minimum parking standards
for the RH, CD, CG, CO, and CN zones are also dictated
by geographic area. Outside the Greater Downtown
boundary, multifamily developments must provide 1.2
spaces per unit. The requirement decreases to 0.5 spaces per unit within the Greater Downtown boundary, with
exceptions for properties that fall within the Magnolia Historic District, Central Parking District, Parking
Improvement District No. 2001-1, or are within one-half mile of a major transit stop as defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code. Residential projects within the aforementioned areas are completely exempt from
minimum parking standards. Because Parking
Improvement District No. 2001-1 completely
encompasses the Downtown Core, the parking
requirement for residential development within the core is effectively reduced to zero. Additionally, varying parking requirement reductions may be granted to a project that provides any combination of affordable housing,
motorcycle parking, additional bicycle parking, preferred carpool/vanpool parking, electric vehicle charging
stations, or shared parking. These discretionary parking requirement reductions are not factored into the
calculations.
The analysis suggests that, even on the smallest parcels in the commercial and RH zoning districts, the maximum
density could be achieved with a mix of studio and onebedroom units served by tuck-under and/or off-site parking. The first step in the calculation was to determine the allowable building footprint given the site size and the maximum lot coverage. The next step was to determine the maximum allowed building envelope given the site area
minus the required setbacks, open space, and parking. To determine maximum building square footage, the building envelope was multiplied by the respective zone’s
maximum height, in stories, to determine the maximum
building square footage.
The inventory sites analyzed below were selected because they represent development in the most constrained
circumstances, i.e. small lots with conventional setbacks (non-zero) in the highest density area (Downtown Core
and within Greater Downtown boundary). As described
above, parking is not required in the Downtown Core. To reach maximum density inside the Greater Downtown,
residential development in the RH zone may use tuckunder and/or shared off-site parking, while development in the CD, CG, CO, and CN zones must use shared offsite parking (already a common practice in Stockton and further enabled by AB 894, Friedman). AB 894 requires
that a local agency must allow parking spaces identified in a shared parking agreement to count towards meeting
parking requirements for new or existing developments,
provided a robust parking analysis accompanies the
application. Parcels outside the Greater Downtown can
surface-park the required spaces without issue. The
accompanying tables show the parking area required for
each scenario and corresponding parking method
(surface, tuck-under, off-site).
Results for the CO zone may be extrapolated to the CG
zone, as the development standards are identical in all ways except maximum height – CG permits an additional
two stories by-right. Similarly, results for the CN zone may be extrapolated to the CD zone, as the development
standards are identical in all ways except maximum height – CD does not have a maximum height.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1262
BR-206 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Table HE-61: Development Scenarios
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM) ZONE SITE 3-55
APN: 15315040
Sub-Area: N/A
Square footage: 4,750
Length (feet): 95
Width (feet): 50
Lot coverage: 0.5
Number of stories (35 ft max): 2
Maximum building footprint, given lot coverage requirements: 2,375 sqft Maximum building envelope, given setbacks (15, 10, 5, and 5 feet), parking (see below for spaces per unit), and
communal/private open spaces (100 sqft per unit):
1,847
Parking spaces per unit: 1.2
Area required for parking (sqft): 480
Parking type: Surface
Maximum building square footage (stories * envelope): 3,694 Number of units: 2
Average unit square footage: 1,847
Achievable Density (units per acre): 17.4
Permitted Density (units per acre): 17.4
RESIDENTIAL HIGH (RH) ZONE SITE 1-30 SITE 2-31 SITE 4-189 APN: 13720204 13712211 16919012
Sub-Area: Downtown Core Inside Greater
Downtown
Outside Greater
Downtown
Square footage: 7,400 4,250 5,200
Length (feet): 100 85 100
Width (feet): 74 50 52
Lot coverage: 0.5 0.5 0.5
Number of stories (35 ft max; no max within DT Core / Greater DT): 6 4 3
Maximum building footprint, given lot coverage requirements: 3,700 2,125 2,600 Maximum building envelope, given setbacks (15, 10, 5, and 5 feet), parking (see below for spaces per unit), and
communal/private open spaces (50 | 75 | 100 sqft per unit):
2,500 1,500* 1,544
Parking spaces per unit: N/A 0.5 1.2
Area required for parking (sqft): N/A 900 960
Parking type: N/A Tuck-under / Off-site Surface
Maximum building square footage (stories * envelope):1 15,000 6,000 4,632 Number of units: 23 9 4
Average unit square footage: 612 627 1,118
Achievable Density (units per acre): 136 90 30
Permitted Density (units per acre): 136 90 30
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1263
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-207
COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CO) ZONE SITE 1-28 SITE 2-42 SITE 2-17 APN: 13719006 13917410 127162212
Sub-Area: Downtown Core Inside Greater
Downtown
Outside Greater
Downtown
Square footage: 5,600 4,750 4,750
Length (feet): 100 95 95
Width (feet): 56 50 50
Lot coverage: 0.6 0.6 0.6
Number of stories (45 ft max; 60 ft max w/ CUP in Downtown Core): 5 4 4
Maximum building footprint, given lot coverage requirements: 3,360 2,850 2,850 Maximum building envelope, given setbacks (15, 10, 5, and 5 feet), parking (see below for spaces per unit) and
communal/private open spaces (50 | 75 | 100 sqft per unit):
2,030 1,500* 1,158
Parking spaces per unit: N/A 0.5 1.2
Area required for parking (sqft): N/A 1,000 720
Parking type: N/A Off-site Surface
Maximum building square footage (stories * envelope):1 10,150 6,000 4,632 Number of units: 17 10 3
Average unit square footage: 597 600 1,544
Achievable Density (units per acre): 136 90 30
Permitted Density (units per acre): 136 90 30
COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (CN) ZONE SITE 1-31 SITE 3-32 SITE 2-17 APN: 13720217 15117045 12716212
Sub-Area: Downtown Core Inside Greater
Downtown
Outside Greater
Downtown
Square footage: 4,750 4,250 5,600
Length (feet): 95 85 95
Width (feet): 50 50 50
Lot coverage: 1.0 1.0 1.0
Number of stories (45 ft max): 4 4 4
Maximum building footprint, given lot coverage requirements: 4,750 4,250 5,600 Maximum building envelope, given setbacks (15, 10, 5, and 5 feet), parking (see below for spaces per unit) and
communal/private open spaces (50 | 75 | 100 sqft per unit):
1,800 1,575* 1,784
Parking spaces per unit: N/A 0.5 1.2
Area required for parking (sqft): N/A 900 960
Parking type: N/A Off-site Surface
Maximum building square footage (stories * envelope):1 7,200 6,300 7,136 Number of units: 15 9 4
Average unit square footage: 480 700 1,784
Achievable Density (units per acre): 136 90 30
Permitted Density (units per acre): 136 90 30
Source: City of Stockton, 20231 Area required for parking not included in this value.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1264
BR-208 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Conclusions
Based on analysis of the permitted densities and
development standards, the City has found that the
General Plan and Development Code facilitate
production of a variety of housing types. The City allows residential development in nonresidential and mixed-use zones and permits densities as high as 136 units per acre in the downtown area. Additionally, the City has flexible development standards to encourage the development of
small infill parcels.
BUILDING CODES AND
ENFORCEMENT
Building codes and their enforcement influence the style, quality, size, and costs of residential development. Such codes can increase the cost of housing and impact the
feasibility of rehabilitating older properties that must be upgraded to current code standards. In this manner,
building codes and their enforcement can act as a
constraint on the supply of housing and its affordability.
The City of Stockton has adopted the 2022 California
Building Code (CBC). These local amendments include:
• Alternate materials and methods of construction:
The Building Official may approve alternate
materials and methods of construction provided
he finds that the proposed design is satisfactory
and complies with the provisions of the model
codes and that the material, method, or work
offered model codes in quality, strength,
effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, safety,
and sanitation.
• Tests: Whenever there is insufficient evidence of
compliance with the adopted model codes or
evidence that any materials or any construction
does not conform to the requirements of the
adopted model codes, the Building Official may
require tests as proof of compliance to be made
at the expense of the owner or his agent by an
approved agency.
The minimum requirements of the CBC and other model
codes may have added to the cost of housing over the
years. However, governmental agencies at all levels as
well as organizations representing building officials have decided that these requirements are necessary to achieve a minimum level of health and safety.
The City’s building codes are consistent with the codes applied in other jurisdictions throughout California and do not negatively impact the construction of affordable
housing.
PARKING STANDARDS
Since off-street parking often requires large amounts of land, parking requirements are one of the development
standards that can impact the development of compact,
affordable housing. Off-street parking requirements
increase the cost of development and limit the funds
available for providing housing. Additionally, parking
standards limit the ability to achieve compact, urban, infill development. Most municipalities adopt parking
standards that exceed the actual parking needs of the
population.
Stockton’s off-street parking standards for residential uses are summarized in Table HE-62. The City requires two
covered parking spaces per single-family home, one
space per multifamily unit, half a space for both greater downtown and outside the downtown, and one space per
unit in townhouses. No off-street parking is required for ADUs.
The Development Code allows the Director or
Commission to reduce or waive up to 20 percent of the
parking requirements, or a minimum of one space, under
the following conditions:
• The structure was designed and intended for
nonresidential use;
• The owner or developer substantiates that the
provision of additional parking is unreasonable
and economically unsound and the compliance
with the provisions of this chapter would entail
severe hardship; and
• The structure or structures were originally built
before the effective date of the current parking
requirements.
Overall, the City’s parking standards are relatively low, both for downtown infill development and development
outside the downtown. The City has also reduced or
eliminated parking for housing developments, including
transit-oriented developments (TOD), affordable housing, senior housing, small lots, etc. Parking standards do not represent a constraint to the development of housing and Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1265
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-209
allow development to achieve maximum allowed
densities. Despite parking reductions on many projects, parking spaces for those with disabilities continue to be provided. No projects have requested to waive inclusion of parking spaces for those with disabilities. The City will continue to explore best practices for parking standards and provide additional incentives to reduce costs and
align standards with current housing market demands,
including the needs and demands of residents with
disabilities.
Table HE-62: Required Off-Street Parking Spaces
Stockton, 2022
RESIDENTIAL USE SPACES/UNIT GUEST PARKING
Single-family dwellings 2 per house in enclosed garage - Townhouses and duplexes 1 covered space per unit, except in the Downtown Core, 0.5 per unit - Triplexes and Fourplexes 1 per unit, except in the Downtown Core, 0.5 per unit - Multifamily dwellings 1 per unit 1 per 4 units
Greater Downtown 0.5 per unit -
Downtown Core1 0.5 per unit -
Affordable Housing 0.5 per unit 1 per 8 units
Organizational houses 1 per 3 occupants 1 per 6 occupants Senior residential projects 1 per 2 units 1 per 10 units Mobile home parks 1 per mobile home 1 per 4 units
Residential care facilities
All, except care homes (6 or
fewer) 1 per 5 beds 1 per 10 beds
Family care homes (7 or
more) 2 per house in enclosed garage 1 per 10 beds
Rooming and boarding houses 1 per 3 occupants -
Single-room occupancy facilities
(SRO)/Co-Living - 1 per 2 guest room
Transitional housing 1 per 2 beds -
Caretaker and employee housing 1 covered space per unit - Emergency shelters 2 spaces per facility
For staff 1 space per 10 occupants allowed at max. capacity - Accessory dwelling units No off-street parking is required for accessory dwelling units - Note 1. Exemptions for parcels within a parking assessment district per Section 16.64.060, Parking Assessment Districts, https://library.qcode.us/lib/stockton_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_16-division_3-chapter_16_64-16_64_060.
Source: City of Stockton Development Code, Section 16.64.040, Table 3-9; November 2022.
ON-/OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT
REQUIREMENTS
In Stockton, the developer is responsible for complete
street improvements for streets of 144 feet right-of-way (flared to 155 feet at major intersections) and less. Existing standards for local streets vary by scenario. For example, a low volume curb to curb street requires a minimum
standard of 34/36 foot wide street. A medium volume
street requires a width of 36 feet. In compliance with the City’s standard specifications and plans, the improvements shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk along street frontages;
2. Replacement of broken or displaced curb, gutter, and sidewalk;
3. Replacement of unnecessary driveways with curb,
gutter, and sidewalk;
4. Wheelchair ramps at curb returns;
5. Pavement sections on new streets;
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1266
BR-210 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
6. Improvements to, or construction of, interchanges with State highways;
7. On existing streets within the subdivision or
development, the existing pavement shall be overlaid
or reconstructed as directed by the City Engineer to
handle the projected traffic;
8. On peripheral streets, the existing pavement shall be overlaid or reconstructed to the centerline of the street as directed by the City Engineer, to accommodate the
projected traffic, and the curb, gutter, and sidewalk
installed;
9. Streets shall be widened in compliance with the
specific plan, precise road plan, or master
development plan, and the existing pavement shall be
overlaid or reconstructed to accommodate the
projected traffic;
10. Fences;
11. Landscaped parkways;
12. Tree wells and sprinkler system;
13. Street lighting; and
14. Street signs.
Site improvements necessary to facilitate the production of housing vary greatly. Some housing developments can
connect to existing infrastructure facilities. In the City of Stockton public improvements for new subdivisions and
single-lot development are dependent on the location of the project.
For greenfield developments, developers are responsible for constructing typical on-site improvements and all offsite public infrastructure associated with the new development. In addition, greenfield development is
required to contribute fees to support the City’s
construction of critical infrastructure, such as sewer and water facilities, and parks.
Off-site improvements for greenfield developments
typically include frontage improvements and underground utilities as well as the construction of new streets
depending on the location.
For large, master planned development projects in
greenfield areas, such as the Cannery Park, University Park and Westlake at Spanos Park projects, which are identified in the Housing Sites Inventory chapter as pipeline projects that are currently under construction, the City required that the developer construct all the infrastructure and public improvements needed to serve the new development.
OPEN SPACE AND PARK
REQUIREMENTS
Open space and park requirements can decrease the
affordability of housing by increasing developer fees
and/or decreasing the amount of land available on a
proposed site for constructing units. All housing units constructed in the city must pay a parkland fee to fund the development of neighborhood and community parks. As
of the October 2022-2023 Fiscal Year, the fee was
$2,798 per single-family unit and $1,712 per multifamily unit.
For land uses and development within the residential, low density (RL) zoning district, a minimum of 150 square feet of private open space is required per duplex unit, beyond the minimum required front-yard, rear-yard, and side-yard setbacks. For multifamily projects, the City requires 100 square feet of usable, common open space for each
dwelling unit. However, per Program 17, this requirement will be reduced to 50 square feet in the Downtown Core
Area and 75 square feet in the Greater Downtown Area.
The City also requires a minimum 40 square feet of private open space (e.g., patios, balcony, and decks). The area provided for private open space may be applied to the
common open space requirement.
In addition to the requirements for residential and
nonresidential, the following open space requirements
apply to all planned development permits:
a. Open space shall be designed as a major element
of the project;
b. Open space shall be located to take advantage
of, and to help preserve, existing natural
amenities (e.g., trees, topographic features,
waterways, and views);
c. Open space shall generally be clustered to create
larger-scale open spaces, but shall also be used
to buffer incompatible uses and to provide
corridors of space around and within developed
areas to achieve a spacious character and
convenient linkage to all parts of the site;
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1267
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-211
d. All landscaped areas shall be designed, installed,
and irrigated in compliance with Chapter 16.56
(Landscaping Standards);1
e. Open space areas shall not include streets,
whether public or private, off-street parking or
landscaping required for the parking lot, access
drives, loading areas, or area(s) covered by
structures;
f. The location of all open space, including any offpremises locations, shall be identified on appropriate plans; and
g. The City’s Planning Commission may modify any
open space requirement after considering the
general purpose and nature of the project. If the
open space requirement is modified, another
amenity(s) must be provided.
The park dedication requirement, the park improvement
fees, and the open space requirements do not represent
excessive constraints on residential development. To help waive park fees, the Stockton Economic Stimulus
Plan provides a fee reduction for some of the Public
Facility Fees (PFF) for both single-family and multi-family residential projects in Stockton. A reduction of PFF up to a total of $19,997 or 100%, whichever is less, for singlefamily residential and $14,080 per unit for multi-family residential for these fee categories:
• City Office Space
• Libraries
• Fire Stations
• Parks
• Community Recreation Centers
• Police Stations
• Street Improvements
PROCESSING AND PERMIT
PROCEDURES
Similar to other jurisdictions, the City has several
procedures it requires developers to follow for processing development entitlements and building permits. Although the permit approval process must conform to the Permit
1 City of Stockton, Landscaping Standards: https://library.qcode.us/lib/stockton_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_16-division_3- chapter_16_56
Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920 et
seq.), housing proposed in the city is subject to one or more of the following review processes: environmental
review, zoning, subdivision review, and building permit approval. The City provides ample opportunities for most housing projects. Most housing projects that come forward are allowed by-right, and only require site plan and design review. These review processes are defined as ministerial in the Development Code and are ministerial actions that do not require hearings nor are subject to CEQA.
Permit Streamlining Act
The Permit Streamlining Act was enacted in 1977 in order to expedite the processing of permits for development
projects. Government Code § 65921. The Permit
Streamlining Act achieves this goal by (1) setting forth various time limits within which state and local government agencies must either approve or disapprove permits and
(2) providing that these time limits may be extended once (and only once) by agreement between the parties. The
Permit Streamlining Act does not apply to legislative land use decisions or to ministerial permits. The City regularly adheres to the time limitations by providing completeness responses to applicants within 30 days of receiving a
development application.
Projects that are exempt from California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) must be processed within 60 days of
deeming the application complete. However, projects that require additional environmental analysis and disclosures to the public are granted additional time to prepare an initial study and circulate the environmental findings for public comments. For projects that do not require review by the Planning Commission or Council, the determination of whether an EIR, ND, or MND is required is made by
Community Development Department staff under the
direction of the Director. For projects that require review by the Planning Commission or Council, the determination is made by the Planning Commission or Council. The City will ensure that there is a process in place to monitor the intake of applications and evaluate whether the
application is complete. The City will ensure that the
CEQA determination of PRC 21080.1 will be made within
the timeframe permitted by PRC 21080.2, and when the
City determines that a project is exempt from CEQA, the Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1268
BR-212 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
determination will trigger the Permit Streamlining Act (PSA) 60-day deadline (Gov. Code 65950(a)(5)).
Review Authority
There are four levels of review authority in Stockton listed from lowest to highest authority: 1) Director of Community Development, 2) Site Plan Review Committee, 3) Planning Commission and 4) City Council.
Residential Permit Processing
The City’s review process for multifamily residential
projects involves the following steps:
1. Submittal of an application to the Planning
Division for Site Plan and Design review. These
design reviews are defined as ministerial per the
Stockton Municipal Code and are approved by
the Community Development Director or their
appointee. These approvals do not require a
public hearing or public notice of determination
as part of the approval.
2. Once the project is submitted, the Project is
reviewed by City staff for Completeness and
compliance with the City’s design standards.
a. This compliance review involves internal
review committees that assist staff in
confirming the site plan and design
standards are adhered to in the proposed
multifamily design.
b. Since multifamily housing is a permitted
use in all but two commercial and
residential zones (Residential Low-Density
“RL” and Commercial Auto “CA”), the
design review is limited to onsite
development (parking, landscaping,
lighting) and architecture, and does not
review the use or operation of the facility.
3. If items are missing from the application for
Completeness and/or design changes are
needed, City staff sends a letter requesting the
items and/or changes within 30-days or sooner
from the application date consistent with the state
law.
4. If the applicant can provide the information
and/or make the needed changes for
resubmitting to the City, staff will then repeat the
process and provide any additional items within
20 to 30 days or sooner given the amount of
changes needed.
5. Once the project design is consistent with the
City’s design standards, City staff send the
applicant an approval letter indicating the date
Planning approved for construction.
a. Should an applicant submit a complete
project that complies with City design
standards at the initial submittal, the
review and approval process could take
between four to six weeks.
b. Approval allows the applicant to receive
construction permit approval for the
proposed design. The City also allows for
concurrent design and construction plan
review should the applicant wish to have
the design and construction plans
reviewed at the same time.
The City’s review process for single family residential projects involves the following steps:
1. Submittal of an application to the Planning
Division for Design review. These design reviews
are defined as ministerial per the Stockton
Municipal Code and are approved by the
Community Development Director or their
appointee. These approvals do not require a
public hearing or public notice of determination
as part of the approval.
2. Once the project is submitted, the Project is
reviewed by City staff for Completeness and
compliance with the City’s design standards. If
items are missing from the application for
Completeness and/or design changes are
needed, City staff sends a letter requesting the
items and/or changes within 30-days or sooner
from the application date consistent with the state
law.
3. Since single family housing is permitted in all
residential zones, the design review is limited to
onsite development (parking, coverage, setbacks)
and building massing (height, accessory
structures).
4. If the applicant can provide the information
and/or make the needed changes for
resubmitting to the City, staff will then repeat the
process and provide any additional items needed
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1269
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-213
within 20 to 30 days or sooner given the number
of changes needed.
5. Once the project design is consistent with the
City’s design standards, City staff send the
applicant an approval letter indicating the date
Planning approved for construction.
a. Should an applicant submit a complete
project that complies with City design
standards at the initial submittal, the
review and approval process could take
between four to six weeks.
b. Approval allows the applicant to receive
construction permit approval for the
proposed design. The City also allows for
concurrent design and construction plan
review should the applicant wish to have
the design and construction plans
reviewed at the same time.
The City’s review process for land division is described below. This includes tentative parcel maps (TPM) (4 lots or less) and tentative subdivision maps (TSM) (4 lots or
greater) and involves the following steps:
1. An application for a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)
or Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM) is considered
discretionary under the Stockton Municipal Code
and the Subdivision Map Act.
2. Once the project is submitted, the Project is
reviewed by City staff for Completeness and
compliance with the City’s design standards. If
items are missing from the application for
Completeness and/or design changes are
needed, City staff sends a letter requesting the
items and/or changes within 30-days or sooner
from the application date consistent with the state
law.
3. If the applicant can provide the information
and/or make the needed changes for
resubmitting to the City, staff will then repeat the
process and provide any additional items within
20 to 30 days or sooner given the number of
changes needed.
4. Once the project design is consistent with the
City’s design standards, conditions of approval
are prepared, and City staff begins the approval
process.
5. TPMs are approved by the Community
Development Director, while TSMs are approved
by the Planning Commission. Both require public
notices sent to surrounding property owners within
300 feet of the project site. However, TPM notices
only inform residents of the Director's decision,
while TSM notices inform them of a Planning
Commission hearing. Public hearings are not
required for TPM approvals unless appealed to
the Planning Commission, while an appeal to the
Planning Commission is sent to the City Council.
6. Should an applicant submit a complete project
that complies with City standards at the initial
submittal, the review and approval process could
take between four to eight weeks for a TPM (from
application to approval) and two to four months
for a TSM (from application to approval hearing).
7. Both tentative maps require Final Map submittal
for recordation. Those review are considered
ministerial and can take two to four months to
complete depending on whether a complete Final
Map application is submitted initially, and if any
of the map conditions of approval require City
Council finalization for items like annexations into
financing districts or subdivision improvements
agreements for construction securities (i.e.,
bonding).
More generally, all development applications are
reviewed by staff and then, if applicable, scheduled for a public hearing with the Planning Commission.
Alternatively, a decision is made at the staff level involving the Community Development Director and/or Site Plan
Review Committee. The application only proceeds to City Council if it also requires a legislative act like a General Plan Amendment or Development Code Amendment, or if
it is appealed. Residential projects in Stockton generally receive concurrent processing of various development
permits (e.g. subdivision and zoning approvals), which
reduces review times and related costs borne by the
applicant.
Typical Permits Required for Residential
Development
Many of the City’s review procedures are handled at the staff level. For example, site plan and design review, minor zone modifications, and variances are conducted by the
Community Development Director, except when the site
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1270
BR-214 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
plan is part of a larger project that requires Planning Commission review.
Site Plan review begins with review by the Site Plan Review Committee who make a recommendation to the Director
who makes the determination. The Site Plan Review
Committee is an internal design review committee and
makes recommendations to the approving body. Typical
projects reviewed by the committee include annexations, condominium projects, multi-family projects and specific plans. Site Plan Review Committee meetings are not open to the public. Site Plan Review applies to any project that requires a Building Permit, where a change in use is
proposed, or where a change in occupancy is proposed.
Projects that are exempt from Site Plan Review include
residential developments containing single-family, duplex, or triplex dwelling units. The committee and Director
conduct a review of the location, design, site plan
configuration, and effect of the proposed development by comparing the project’s plans to:
1. The requirements and standards in the Municipal
Code;
2. Required locational and developmental standards
identified in the Development Code, including
applicable standards for specific land uses in
Chapter 16.80 (Standards for Specific Land Uses);
3. Requirements of the City’s California Building
Standards Code; and
4. The City’s standard specifications and plans.
The Site Plan Review Committee may find that a project
site plan is in compliance, needs very minor corrections, needs minor corrections, or needs major corrections.
Based on the recommendation of the committee, the
Director either approves or requests revisions and
resubmittal of the site plan. Site Plan Review is a ministerial action that does not require California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) review.
A use permit is a permit issued by the City for land uses that, although allowed in a specific zoning district, have the potential to adversely affect other land uses,
transportation and parking, or other facilities in the
vicinity. The use permit contains conditions to eliminate, or minimize to an acceptable level, any potentially adverse effects of the use. The City of Stockton currently has three types of conditional permits: Land Development Permits, Administrative Use Permits, and Commission Use Permits.
The review of projects for appropriate and efficient
development and layout of a site is an integral part of the development approval process. All land uses shown as “L” in Table 2-2 of the Development Code (16.20.020,
Allowable land uses and permit requirements) that require construction of new structures or improvements, the
expansion of an existing facility, or a change to a more intensive use, as determined by the Director, require the approval of a Land Development Permit. The Director is
the review authority for a Land Development Permit;
however, the Director may defer action and refer the
application directly to the Planning Commission.
The Review Authority may approve the Land Development
Permit, with or without conditions if it finds all of the following:
1. The proposed land use activity is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Land
Development Permit and complies with all other
applicable provisions of the Development Code and
the Municipal Code;
2. The proposed land use activity would be consistent
with the general land uses, objectives, policies, and
programs of the General Plan and any applicable
Specific Plan, Precise Road Plan, or Master
Development Plan;
3. The subject site would be physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed,
including the provision of services (e.g., sanitation and water), public access, and the absence of physical
constraints (e.g., earth movement, flooding); and
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use
and all fences and walls, landscaping, loading,
parking, yards, and other features required by this
Development Code; served by streets adequate in
width and pavement type to carry the traffic generated
by the proposed development.
4. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the
proposed use at the location proposed would not
endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a
hazard to the public convenience, health, interest,
safety, or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use;
and
5. The proposed permit would be in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1271
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-215
An Administrative Permit is required for uses that have the potential for a slight impact on existing land uses
surrounding a given site. The Community Development
Director is the review authority for an Administrative Use Permit and may defer action and refer the application
directly to the Planning Commission.
Permits for uses that have the potential for a significant impact on surrounding areas, either because of the size of the project or the nature of the use, require a Commission Use Permit. The Planning Commission serves as the review authority for Commission Use Permits.
The decision-making authority may approve or
conditionally approve an application for an Administrative or Commission Use Permit if it finds all of the following:
1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Municipal Code;
2. The proposed use would maintain or strengthen the
integrity and character of the neighborhood and
zoning district in which it is to be located;
3. The proposed use would be consistent with the
general land uses, objectives, policies, and programs
of the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan
or Master Development Plan;
4. The subject site would be physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed,
including the provision of services (e.g., sanitation and water), public access, and the absence of physical
constraints (e.g., earth movement, flooding);
5. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the
proposed use at the location proposed and for the
time period(s) identified, if applicable, would not
endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a
hazard to the public convenience, health, interest,
safety, or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use;
6. The design, location, size, and operating
characteristics of the proposed use would be
compatible with the existing and future land uses onsite and in the vicinity of the subject property; and
7. The proposed action would be in compliance with the
provisions of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines.
An applicant may choose to propose a Planned
Development Permit for a more creative project produce
a development of equal or greater quality than might
otherwise occur with a more traditional development
proposal. The Review Authority may approve the Planned
Development Permit, with or without conditions if it finds all of the following:
1. The proposed development would:
a. Be allowed within the subject zoning district;
b. Generally comply with all of the applicable
provisions of this Development Code relating to
both on- and off-site improvements that are
necessary to accommodate maximum flexibility in
site planning and property development and to
carry out the purpose, intent, and requirements of
the respective zoning district, including prescribed
development standards; and
c. Be consistent with the general land uses,
objectives, policies, and programs of the General
Plan and any applicable specific plan, precise
road plan, or master development plan;
2. There are adequate provisions for public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed development
would not be detrimental to public health and safety;
3. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the
proposed activity at the location proposed would not
endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a
hazard to the public convenience, health, interest,
safety, or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use;
4. The subject site would be:
a. Physically suitable for the type and
density/intensity of use and structure(s) being
proposed including the provision of services (e.g.,
sanitation, utilities, and water), public access, and
the absence of physical constraints (e.g., earth
movement, flooding, etc.);
b. Adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
use and all fences and walls, landscaping,
loading, parking, yards, and other features
required by this Development Code; and
c. Served by streets adequate in width and pavement
type to carry the quantity and type of traffic
generated by the proposed development.
5. The proposed development would produce a
comprehensive development of superior quality (e.g.,
appropriate variety of structure placement and
orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, increased
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1272
BR-216 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
amounts of landscaping and open space, improved
solutions to the design and placement of parking
facilities, etc.) than might otherwise occur from more
traditional development applications;
6. The proposed design and development is innovative
and creative and in compliance with the standards
identified in Chapter 16.68 (Planned Development
Permit Standards); and
7. The proposed permit would be in compliance with
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines.
A significant amount of multifamily development in the city has been approved as part of Specific Plans and Master
Development Plans. For example, most specific plans
allow multi-family residential by right only requiring design review and site plan review. The City has facilitated
development of new multifamily housing by including the approval of multifamily development as part of the
approval process for Specific Plans or Master
Development Plans.
Permit Processing Timing
Table HE-63 summarizes the City’s estimated processing
times, approval bodies and typical number of hearings for City approvals that may be required in the residential
development process. These processing times are typical for California cities. Processing times vary but, generally, are not necessarily dependent on the designated approval body. The thing that impacts development review is
primarily the size and complexity of the project. Projects are reviewed for compliance with the City’s ordinances
and the completeness of the application. Table HE-64
summarizes the City’s estimated processing times for City approvals that may be required in the single-family and multi-family residential development process. Not all steps identified in Table HE-64 apply to every project, Table HE64 is representative of typical multifamily and single-family projects occurring in zones where these types of
development are a permitted use, which is the majority of zones allowing residential development in the city.
To provide an efficient permit processing system, the City has implemented the following time and cost saving
developmental processes:
• Prepared permit processing guidelines to assist
residential builders in applying for development
permits for single-family residences, multi-family
residential developments and subdivisions.
• Located all City divisions involved in the permitting process in one central location.
• Developed a pre-application process to identify
issues as soon as possible and reduce processing
time. No fee is required for this service.
• Provided a GIS application on the City’s website
with land use information and links to important
planning documents such as General Plan and
Development Code.
• Encouraged concurrent processing of
applications.
• Assigned a point-person and liaison to facilitate
communication and timely inter-agency review of
development projects.
• Established electronic plan check review services
and on-line access to permit forms and
applications.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1273
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-217
Table HE-63: Community Development/
Planning Division Schedule of Residential
Processing Times
Stockton, 2023
RESIDENTIAL
APPROVALS
APPROXIMATE
PROCESSING
TIME (WEEKS)
APPROVAL
BODY AND
TYPICAL
NUMBER OF
HEARINGS
Rezonings and Prezonings 12-18 City Council – 2
hearings
Special Use Permits, Use
Permits Requiring Public
Hearings and Use
Permits on 14-Day
6-10
Planning
Commission – 1
hearing
Planned Unit Residential
Development Permits 6-8
Planning
Commission – 1
hearing
Amendment to The
Stockton Municipal Code,
Specific Plan or General
Plan
12-24 City Council – 2
hearings
Tentative Maps 4 Lots or
Less 6-8
City Engineer. No
hearings required
Tentative Maps Over 4
Lots 6-8
City Council – 1
hearing
Variance/Waiver,
Interpretation or Appeal
of a Decision of The
Community Development
Director
4-6
Planning
Commission – 1
hearing
Appeals to City Council 4-6
City Council – 1
hearing
Design Review 1-4
Non-discretionary
administrative –
Planning Staff (no
hearing)
Limited Discretion
– Director (no
hearing unless
request is made
for ARC review)
Discretionary –
Director, Planning
Commission or
City Council
depending on
project type. 1
hearing if heard by
Planning
Commission or
City Council
Environmental
Documentation Varies
City Council –
number of
hearings depends
of type of
environmental
review required
Source: City of Stockton, 2023.
Table HE-64: Residential Approvals
Required for Typical Permitted Residential
Projects
Stockton, 2023
RESIDENTIAL
APPROVALS
SINGLE FAMILY
APPROXIMATE
PROCESSING
TIME (WEEKS)
MULTI-FAMILY
APPROXIMATE
PROCESSING
TIME (WEEKS)
Special Use Permits,
Use Permits Requiring
Public Hearings and
Use Permits on 14-
Day
6-10 N/A
Planned Unit
Residential
Development Permits
6-8 N/A
Amendment to The
Stockton Municipal
Code, Specific Plan or
General Plan
12-24 N/A
Tentative Maps 4 Lots
or Less 6-8 6-8
Tentative Maps Over
4 Lots 6-8 N/A
Design Review 1-4 1-4
Source: City of Stockton, 2023.
The typical amount of time between planning
approval/entitlement and when an application for a
building permit is submitted varies by project type and is determined by the applicant. Applicants have one year to act upon an entitlement and request a building permit.
They can submit a request for a building permit as soon as 10 days following entitlement. Based on recent
building permit data, a typical length of time is four to six weeks before submitting an application for a building
permit. ADUs are allowed by-right and go straight to a
building permit, unless they are in a Design District. In that case, they go to the Architectural Review Committee (which meets alternative weeks). Most single-family
residential projects are also allowed by-right and go
straight to building permit, unless in a Design District, then go to an Architectural Review Committee. Multifamily
residential projects go to the Architectural Review
Committee and require Site Plan Review (meetings are set as applications are received).
Design Review
The City has a design review process to encourage
development that is compatible and harmonious with the
design and use of surrounding properties and with the city in general. The following types of residential development are subject to the City’s design review process:
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1274
BR-218 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
• New single-family tract development in
subdivision of five or more parcels;
• New single-family infill projects within special
districts in historic areas with unique
architecture;
• Additions and exterior remodeling of singlefamily dwellings within special districts visible from public right-of-way;
• New developments containing two or more
dwelling units;
• Additions and exterior remodeling of existing
multifamily projects; and
• Accessory structures in special districts or as part
of a multifamily project greater than 120 square
feet that are visible from the public right-of-way.
The City’s adopted design guidelines are used by City
staff, the Director, Architectural Review Committee (ARC), Cultural Heritage Board, Commission, and Council as
adopted criteria for the review of development proposals.
The City’s design review process is codified in Title 16 of the Stockton Municipal Code (Development Code). The
procedure to be followed depends on whether
discretionary approval is required from the Planning
Commission or City Council (see Table HE-63). For
projects that do not require any type of discretionary
approval, the applicant is required to submit design review plans before building permit submittal. The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) is an internal design review
consisting of a panel of three private-sector architects appointed by the Director. The ARC performs the design
reviews on an alternating weekly schedule. Architectural Review Committee meetings are not open to the public.
The ARC reviews the submitted plans for compliance with the design guidelines and/or applicable Development
Code standards, and make recommendations and
supporting findings in compliance with the list of
recommendations. Following the ARC’s review of the
plans, the Director will prepare and transmit a list of the ARC’s findings and recommendations to the applicant in
a timely manner, noting that a request for reconsideration may be submitted, where applicable.
For projects that require a discretionary approval (e.g., Use Permit, rezoning), the applicant submits elevations of the proposed project at the time the discretionary
application is submitted. The Director reviews the project for compliance with the land use and development
regulations in the Development Code. The ARC reviews
the overall design of the project for compliance with the design guidelines. In reviewing the design of the project, the ARC uses the design guidelines as a reference, and
makes recommendations and supporting findings in the
list of recommendations. Following the ARC’s review of the plans, the Director prepares and transmits a list of the ARC’s findings and recommendations to the applicant in
a timely manner, noting that a request for reconsideration may be submitted and/or that the Planning Commission is the final Design Review Authority, where applicable.
Required Findings
The Review Authority shall determine whether a project
adequately meets adopted City standards and the
Guidelines, based on consistency with the following
findings:
A. The proposed development is consistent with all
applicable provisions of this Development Code
and other applicable City ordinances;
B. The general design considerations, including the
character, quality, and scale of design are
consistent with the purpose/intent of this chapter
and the Guidelines and other design guidelines
that may be adopted by the City;
C. The architectural design of structures and their
materials and colors are visually compatible with
surrounding development. Design elements (e.g.,
awnings, exterior lighting, screening of
equipment, signs) have been incorporated into
the project to further ensure its compatibility with
the character and uses of adjacent development,
and/or between the different types of uses in a
mixed-use development;
D. The location and configuration of structures are
compatible with their sites and with surrounding
sites and structures and do not unnecessarily
block views from other structures or dominate
their surroundings;
E. The general landscape design, including the
color, coverage, location, size, texture, and type
of plant materials, provisions for irrigation,
planned maintenance, and protection of
landscape elements have been considered to
ensure visual relief, to complement structures, and
to provide an attractive environment;
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1275
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-219
F. The design and layout of the proposed project will
not interfere with the use and enjoyment of
neighboring existing or future development and
will not result in vehicular or pedestrian hazards;
G. The building design and related site plans,
including on-site parking and loading, has been
designed and integrated to ensure the intended
use will best serve the potential users or patrons
of the site; and
H. Special requirements or standards have been
adequately incorporated, when applicable, into
the building and/or site design (e.g., Americans
with Disabilities Act regulations, historic
preservation, mitigation measures, open space,
utilities). (Prior code Section 16-515.060)
Senate Bill 330
Senate Bill (SB) 330, the Housing Crisis Act of 2019,
established specific requirements and limitations on
development application procedures. The bill allows
housing developments for which a preliminary application is submitted that complies with applicable general plan and zoning standards is subject only to the development standards and fees that were applicable at the time of
submittal. This applies to all projects unless the project square footage or unit count changes by more than 20
percent after the preliminary application is submitted. The developer must submit a full application for the
development project within 180 days of submitting the
preliminary application.
The City of Stockton offers a pre-application conference for any application for new development or
redevelopment which is required to go before the Planning Commission and any subdivision map for five or more lots, to ensure that the applicant is aware of issues and
requirements related to the project. Other departments
and public agencies may be invited to attend a preapplication conference. The fee for the pre-application conference shall be in compliance with the City Council’s most recently published fee schedule.
Currently, the City of Stockton does not have a process established for processing projects under SB 330;
however, the City complies with state law regarding SB
330 using the state’s form. The City has included Program 19 to establish a process that specifies the SB 330 process and standards for eligible projects.
Senate Bill 35
Currently, the City of Stockton does not have a process established for processing projects under SB 35; however, the City complies with state law regarding SB 35. The City has included Program 16 to establish a process that
specifies the SB 35 streamlining approval process and
standards for eligible projects.
Summary
Processing and permit procedures have not been found to be a constraint in Stockton. However, Program 17
commits the City to review and update the findings for use permits and Design Review to be objective to further
streamline development review.
DEVELOPMENT FEES AND OTHER
EXACTIONS
As shown in Table HE-66, the City collects various fees from developers to cover the costs of processing permits and providing necessary services and infrastructure.
Additional fees and/or time may be necessary for required environmental reviews, depending on the location and
nature of a project. Certain residential projects that require General Plan amendments, Development Code changes,
or other planning-related functions require fees in addition to those listed in the table. These required fees are usually needed for master plans in greenfield areas.
Planning and Building permit fees and applicable impact fees vary from project to project. Table HE-66 shows fees for a “typical” project in Stockton with updated 2022-23 rates. Multifamily fees are based on a hypothetical 27-unit multifamily development on 1.48 acres. Single family fees are based on a hypothetical 3-bedroom 2-bath home
1,800 square footage home and the Building Data
Valuation Data for a unit in the R-3 zone. Estimated fees in Stockton are $61,725 for the hypothetical 1,800 sq ft single-family unit and $33,028 for the hypothetical
multifamily unit, including City fees, permit fees, as well as County fees and school district fees. Based on an estimate of typical costs to develop housing, including land cost and construction costs, planning and impact Fee’s
represent 10.7 percent of development fees for a singlefamily unit and 10.8 percent per unit for a 27-unit multifamily development in the City of Stockton.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1276
BR-220 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Other impact fees for agriculture and open space are
charged by the gross acre and designed to mitigate for the loss of productive land. The agricultural land mitigation fee, at $14,352 per gross acre for single-family units, and at $12,841 per gross acre for multifamily units, applies when development converts “important farmland” to
private urban uses. The San Joaquin Council of
Governments collects the San Joaquin County MultiSpecies Habitat and Open Space Conservation Plan fee to mitigate the loss of important habitat and open space.
Table HE-65: Planning Fees
Stockton, 2022-2023
FEE CATEGORY FEE AMOUNT
Subdivision Fees
Tentative Maps - 4 Lots or Less $1,045.00
Tentative Maps - 5 to 25 Lots – Base Fee $3,135.00
Tentative Maps - 26 – 100 Lots $4,702.00
Tentative Maps - 101 Lots or more $10,000 deposit; cost for recovery Vesting Tentative Map Actual Cost plus 25% Admin
Minor Tentative Map Amendment $1,045.00
Condominium Conversion $3,135.00
Major Tentative Map Amendment $3,135.00
Planned Development Permit $3,135.00
Annexations/Reorganizations/Detachments $20,000 deposit; cost for recovery Annexation Sphere of Influence Amendment/Service Reviews $20,000 deposit; cost for recovery Historic Preservation District/Landmarks/Certificates/Demolitions Historic Preservation District Designation Change $1,045.00 Certificate of Appropriateness $261.00
Historic Demolition or Relocation Permit Application $261.00 Historic Landmark or Site Designation Application $1,045.00 Zoning Fees
Rezoning and Prezoning $5,225.00
Zoning Compliance/Confirmation $788.00
Zoning Fees Development Agreement (Development Agreement Application) Development Agreement (DA) Application $5,225.00
Major Amendment to Development Application $5,225.00
Minor Amendment to Development Application $1,045.00
Use Permits
Temporary Activity Permits $104.00
Minor Amendment of Use Permits $314.00
Commission Use Permit $3,135.00
Administrative Use Permits $1,045.00
Home Occupation Permit
Home Occupation Permit $26.00
Land Development Permits Design Review, Other Development Plans Billboard Cap and Replace Review $1,045.00
Design Review $1,045.00
Design Review – Minor $157.00
Land Development Permit/Site Plan Review $1,045.00
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1277
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-221
FEE CATEGORY FEE AMOUNT
Variance/Waiver Requests, Administrative Interpretations/Determinations Variance/Commission Waiver $3,135.00
Appeal of Community Development Director Decision or
Administrative Hearing Officer Decision $522.00
Street Name Change $3,135.00
Public Convenience and Necessity Letter $1,045.00
Administrative Determinations/Exceptions/Waivers $1,045.00 Administrative Hearing Fee $98.00
Tree Removal
Street Tree Removal Permit $261.00
Heritage Oak Removal Administrative Fee – Permit for Removal $65.00 Heritage Oak Removal Noticing Fee $112.00
Heritage Oak Removal Independent Arborist Report Fee $84.00 Appeal to City Council of Tree Permit Denial $378.00
Environmental Assessments
Initial Study/Negative Declaration $1,568.00
Expanded Initial Study/Negative Declaration $3,135.00
Addendum to Expanded Initial Study or Expanded initial
Study/Negative Declaration 25% of consultant contract
Environmental Impact Report/Mitigate Negative Declaration 25% of consultant contract Code/Plan Adoption and Amendments
Amendment to the Stockton Municipal Code (Chapter XVI) $5,225.00 Establishment of Design Review Overlay District and Historical Preservation District $5,225.00
Amendment to General Plan $5,225.00
Precise Road Plan Adoption and Amendments
Adopt Precise Road Plan $5,225.00
Major Amendment to Precise Road Plan $2,612.00
Minor Amendment to Precise Road Plan $1,306.00
Specific Plan Adoption and Amendments
Adopt Specific Plan $20,00 deposit; cost for recovery
Major Amendment to Specific Plan $20,00 deposit; cost for recovery Minor Amendment to Specific Plan $20,00 deposit; cost for recovery Specific Plan/Master Plan Implementation Surcharge 0.02 of all Building permits within Specific/Master Plan/Planned Development Areas
Land Use Master Development Plan (MX Zone) Plan Adoption and Amendments Adopt Master Development Plan (MX Zone) $20,000 deposit; cost for recovery Major Amendment to Master Plan $20,000 deposit; cost for recovery Minor Amendment to Master Plan $20,000 deposit; cost for recovery Specific Plan/Master Plan Consultant Services $10,000 deposit; cost for recovery Source: City of Stockton Planning Fees 2022-2023 Fiscal Year Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1278
BR-222 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Table HE-66: Development Impact and Planning-Related Fees Stockton, February 2023
FEES SINGLE-FAMILY UNIT1
27-UNIT MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT2
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PER UNIT
Municipal Utilities Department Fees
Water $2,264.41 $49,766.67 $1,843.21
Sewer $974.53 $2,133.76 $79.03
Delta Water Supply Project $5,508.23 $29,359 $1,087.37
Water and Sewer Administrative Fee $113.36 $1,816.52 $67.28 Total Municipal Utilities Department Fees $8,860.53 $83,075.82 $3,076.88 Public Facilities and Services Fees
Surface Water $4,587 $41,793 $1,547.89
Park Land $2,798 $46,224 $1,712
Public Works Residential Construction $75.25 $75.25 $2.79 Agriculture Land Mitigation $658.95 $25,682 $951.19
Air Quality $187 $3,429 $127
City Office Space $467.00 $10,557 $391.00
Community Recreation Center $481.00 $10,935 $405.00
Fire Prevention Review Fee N/A $201 $7.44
Fire Station $781 $17,766 $658
Libraries $902 $20,547 $761.00
Police Station Expansion $591 $13,419 $497
Street Improvements $13,226 $260,712 $9,656
Traffic Signal $110 $1,796 $66.50
Regional Transportation Impact $8,106.52 $65,663 $2,431.95 Total Public Facilities and Services Fees $32,971 $518,798 $19,214.76 Planning Fees
Building Permit $2,428.31 $35,629.43 $1,319.61
Building Plan Check $1,019.89 $14,964.36 $554.24
General Plan Maintenance and Implementation 448.43 $7,786.24 $288.38 Site Plan Review $1,045.00 $1,045.00 $38.70
Total Planning Fees $4,941.63 $59,425.03 $2,200.93
Other Fees
Fee Area - Administrative Fee4 $1,872.52 $18,157.94 $672.52 Strong Motion Instrumental Program (SMIP) Fee $38.86 $674.81 $24.99 Technology Fee $182.12 $2,672.21 $98.97
Capital Preservation Fee $298.95 $5,190.83 $192.25
Green Building Fee $11.96 $207.63 $8.00
Community Rating System Administration Fee (CRS) $145.70 $2,137.77 $79.18 Total Other Fees $2,550 $29,041.18 $1,075.60
TOTAL CITY FEES $49,323.00 $690,340.42 $25,568.16
County and Special District Fees
County Fee $1,890 $64,800 $1,620
School District3 $10,512 $157,680 $5,840
TOTAL FEES $61,725.00 $912,820.42 $33,028.16
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1279
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-223
FEES SINGLE-FAMILY UNIT1
27-UNIT MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT2
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PER UNIT
TOTAL COUNTY AND SPECIAL DISTRICT FEES $12,402 $222,480 $7,460 Land Costs $98,000 $337,162 $12,487
Construction Costs $299,955 $5,109,831 $192,253
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST INCLUDING FEES $459,680.00 $6,400,813.42 $237,768.64
STOCKTON FEES AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL
COST
10.7% 10.7% 10.8%
Notes:
1 Single-family unit fees are from the City of Stockton website fee estimator (October 2015), based on a new 1,800-square-foot single-family detached home within city limits with a valuation of $299,955 and a 0.75-inch water meter size. 2 Multifamily fees are from City of Stockton, based on a 27-unit apartment building, on a 1.48-acre property with a structural valuation of $5,190,825 and a 2-inch water meter.
3 School Fees are determined by the school district. Estimate is based on Stockton Unified School District fees. Single-family: $5.84/SF; multifamily:
$5.84/SF.
4 Public Facilities and Services Fees multiplied by the 3.5% administrative fee equals totals.
Source: City of Stockton Fee for 2022-2023 Fiscal Year, 2022
DENSITY BONUS
State law (Government Code Section 65915 et seq.)
requires local governments to grant a density bonus to
developers that agree to provide a specific percentage of affordable housing, senior housing, or childcare facilities for lower- or moderate-income households as part of an
approved development. The law is revised nearly every
year and has been expanding to apply to more projects
and allow larger bonuses and more incentives and
concessions over the years. The magnitude of the incentive depends on the total share of development that is
designated affordable. Program 20 commits the City to
updating their Density Bonus ordinance when needed for
consistency with state law and to continue to update it regularly throughout the planning period as updates to
state law are made. Chapter 16.40 of Stockton’s
Development Code describes the City’s density bonus
provisions. In addition to regulations to comply with State law, Chapter 16.40 includes additional bonuses beyond
what is offered under state law. Tier 1 Supplemental
Density Bonuses offer bonuses between 50 and 75% and
Tier 2 Supplemental Density Bonuses offer bonuses
between 75 and 100%. A project’s eligibility for a Tier 1 or Tier 2 bonus are based on achieving eligibility points based on amount of affordable units, sustainable design (LEED certification, Cal Green, alternative energy),
incorporation of adaptive reuse, or location in priority areas of the city including in the Downtown Core, a
disadvantaged community, or federal qualified
opportunity zone.
LOCAL ORDINANCES THAT IMPACT
HOUSING SUPPLY
The City doesn’t have ordinances regulating short-term
rentals, inclusionary housing, nor growth management
that would potentially impact long-term housing supply.
PROVISIONS FOR A VARIETY OF
HOUSING TYPES
Multifamily
The Zoning Ordinance allows multifamily development by
right in the RM, RH, CN, CO, CG, and CD zones, and
conditionally in the CL zone and with a land use permit in the OS zone. The City has not approved any new
construction residential projects at densities below those identified in the inventory.
Accessory Dwelling Unit
An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is an additional selfcontained living unit, either attached to or detached from the primary residential unit on a single lot. It has cooking, eating, sleeping, and full sanitation facilities. ADUs can be an important source of affordable housing since they can be constructed relatively cheaply and have no associated land costs. ADUs can also provide supplemental income
to the homeowner, allowing seniors to remain in their
homes, or moderate-income families to afford houses.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1280
BR-224 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
To encourage establishment of ADUs on existing
developed lots, notwithstanding subdivisions state law
requires cities and counties to either adopt an ordinance based on standards set out in the law authorizing creation of ADUs in, to allow ADUs on lots zoned residential or
mixed-use zone subject to ministerial approval (“by right”) if they meet standards set out by law.
The City of Stockton meets State requirements for ADUs.
The City of Stockton allows ADUs in all zoning districts that allow residential development. The Review Authority issues a ministerial building permit for an ADU or junior
accessory dwelling unit (JADU) without discretionary
review or a hearing, consistent with the development
standards and State law. The City of Stockton is in
compliance with state ADU law. Program 6 commits the
City to continue updating their ADU regulations to stay consistent with state law and commits the City to
promoting the development of ADUs as a housing type in
the city.
Manufactured Homes and Mobile Home
Parks
Sections 65852.3 and 65852.4 of the California
Government Code specify that a jurisdiction shall allow the installation of manufactured homes on a foundation
on all “lots zoned for conventional single family residential dwellings.” Except for architectural requirements, the
jurisdiction is only allowed to “subject the manufactured home and the lot on which it is placed to the same
development standards to which a conventional single
family residential dwelling on the same lot would be
subject.” The architectural requirements are limited to roof overhang, roofing material, and siding material.
The only two exceptions that local jurisdictions are allowed to make to the manufactured home siting provisions are
if: (1) there is more than 10 years difference between the date of manufacture of the manufactured home and the
date of the application for the issuance of an installation permit; or (2) if the site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and regulated by a legislative body
pursuant to Government Code Section 37361. Section
69852.7 of the California Government Code specifies
that mobile home parks shall be a permitted use on “all land planned and zoned for residential land use.”
However, local jurisdictions are allowed to require use permits for mobile home parks. The City of Stockton’s
Development Code defines mobile homes on a
permanent foundation under the definition of “Singlefamily dwellings”. Zones where this use is allowed are shown in Table HE-58. Additionally, mobile home parks
are allowed in the Residential Low-Density (RL), Residential Medium-Density (RM), Residential High-Density (RH),
General Commercial (CG), and Commercial Downtown
(CD) districts with an Administrative Use Permit.
Section 16.80.210 of Stockton’s Development Code
provides specific development standards for mobile home parks, including a minimum of 20-foot setback for mobile home spaces, buildings, parking or recreational areas,
and other structures from all property lines along public streets. Additionally, access to the mobile home park must be directly to a major arterial street or within 500 feet of freeway access ramps. Stockton’s Municipal Code
conforms to Government Code Section 69852.7.
Group Homes
State law requires group residential facilities of six or few persons to be considered a single-family dwelling for the purpose of any law or zoning ordinance related to
residential property use (California Health and Safety
Code Sections 1267.8, 1566.3, 1568.08). As of 2022,
licensed care homes consisting of six or fewer individuals are allowed by right in the RL, RM, RH, CD, and PF zones.
However, these are not all the zones that allow singlefamily development; the RE zone also allows single-family dwellings by right. The Housing Element includes Program 17 to amend the Development Code to allow group
homes for six persons or fewer in the RE zone.
Family care homes with more than six individuals require the approval of a Commission Use Permit in the RE, RH,
and CD zones, and a land development permit in the PF
zone. The Commission Use Permit process is the only
restriction to family care homes with more than six
individuals. Group homes in single-family or two-family structures are exempt from Title 24 requirements. The
Commission Use Permit has not been used to deny a
family care home of seven or more individuals in Stockton.
According to the Health and Safety Code Sections
1267.8, 1566.3, and 1568.08, residential care facilities with seven or more must be allowed without a use permit.
To ensure compliance with State law, the City has
incorporated Program 17 to address this part of the
statute.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1281
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-225
Farmworkers and Employee Housing
State law asserts that employee housing for six persons or less shall be allowed in the same way residential structures are allowed in zones allowing residential uses and that employee housing for up to 12 units or 36 beds shall be deemed an agricultural use and must be subject to the
same regulations as any other agricultural use in the same zone. “No Conditional Use Permit, zoning variance, or
other zoning clearance shall be required of this employee housing that is not required of any other agricultural
activity in the same zone” (Employee Housing Act,
California Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and
17021.6). Farm labor housing is considered an
agricultural activity and is permitted by right in all zones allowing agricultural uses, which complies with State law (Health and Safety Code Section 17021.6). Program 17
is included to update the Development Code to allow
employee housing for six persons or less in the same way residential structures are allowed in zones allowing
residential uses.
Emergency Shelters
SB 2, passed in 2007 and in effect as of January 1, 2008, amended State Housing Element law (California
Government Code Sections 65582, 65583, and
65589.5) regarding shelter for homeless persons. This
legislation requires local jurisdictions to strengthen
provisions for addressing the housing needs of homeless persons, including the identification of a zone or zones where emergency shelters are allowed as a permitted use without a use permit or other discretionary approval.
Assembly Bill (AB) 2339, passed in 2022 and in effect as of January 1, 2023, expands the requirements for
allowing emergency shelters under State law to ensure
sufficient space on sufficient sites in suitable locations are identified in each jurisdiction.
California Health and Safety Code Section 50801(e) and
Government Code Section 65583(a)(4) define
“emergency shelters” as:
Housing with minimal supportive services for
homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of
six months or less by a homeless person. No
individual or household may be denied
emergency shelter because of an inability to pay.”
Emergency shelters include interim interventions,
including, but not limited to, a navigation center,
bridge housing, and respite or recuperative care.
The City of Stockton’s Development Code defines
homeless shelters as:
A public or private building which provides
immediate, short-term shelter that may involve
supplemental services for more than six homeless
individuals or family members without
compensation.
Emergency shelters are allowed in the Residential HighDensity, Commercial Office, Commercial General, and Commercial Downtown with a Commission Use Permit.
The Development Code does not place any further
restrictions or requirements. The City also allows
emergency shelters “by right” (i.e., without a Commission Use Permit or other discretionary approval) in the Industrial Limited (IL), Industrial General (IG), and Public Facilities (PF) districts. While the IL and IG zones allow industrial uses, the zones are reserved for operations that are totally conducted indoors. The PF zone allows numerous other
residential uses, including single-family homes and
multifamily units, and is therefore suitable for emergency shelters. There are over 19 acres of vacant land on at least 22 parcels within Stockton city limits zoned IL, IG, or PF (as of 2024). All analyzed parcels are vacant. About 1.7 acres of this land is within the Greater Downtown area, where there is convenient access to social services and public transportation. The 19 plus acres of vacant land on 22 parcels is made up of a variety of parcel sizes ranging from .01 acres up to 9.1 acres. Only 3 of the parcels are smaller than .10 acres. Details are shown in the table
below.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1282
BR-226 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
APN ACRES ZONING DISTRICT
16528054 1.70 IL
16355058 0.06 PF
16302041 5.11 IG
15529024 0.13 IL
15304015 0.17 IL
15304014 0.17 IL
15304013 0.17 IL
15304012 0.17 IL
15303024 0.18 IL
15303023 0.18 IL
15303004 0.12 IL
15303003 0.12 IL
15303002 0.12 IL
15112061 0.01 PF
14907040 0.09 IG
14713007 0.84 IG
14713001 0.31 IG
14710104 0.11 IL
14710103 0.11 IL
14710102 0.23 IL
14530011 0.25 IL
11736013 9.10 IG
19.45 However, only one of these parcels is in the PF zone which allows residential uses. In order to ensure there are
sufficient suitable locations for emergency shelters in zones that allow residential uses, the City has analyzed vacant sites in the Residential High-Density, Commercial Office, Commercial General, and Commercial Downtown zoning
districts as candidate areas. As shown in Figures HE-22 a and b in the Assessment of Fair Housing chapter, areas of the city in these four zoning districts are spread out
geographically presenting the opportunity to allow
emergency shelters on sites meeting the suitability criteria listed further down in this section. The following vacant parcels are available in these zoning districts:
• Residential High-Density – 61 vacant parcels
totaling more than 116 acres. The size of the
parcels ranges from .04 to 50.0 acres. The sizes
break down further as follows:
o Less than .1 acre – 12 parcels
o Between .1 to .25 acres – 28 parcels
o Between .25 to .5 acres – 7 parcels
o Between .5 to 1 acre – 1 parcel
o Between 1 and 5 acres – 9 parcels
o Between 5 and 50 acres – 4 parcels
• Commercial Office – 42 vacant parcels totaling
more than 23 acres. The size of the parcels
ranges from .04 to 8.9 acres. The sizes break
down further as follows:
o Less than .1 acre – 3 parcels
o Between .1 to .25 acres – 27 parcels
o Between .25 to .5 acres – 4 parcels
o Between .5 to 1 acre – 2 parcels
o Between 1 and 8.9 acres – 6 parcels
• Commercial General – 275 vacant parcels
totaling more than 317 acres. The size of the
parcels ranges from .02 to 55.8 acres. The sizes
break down further as follows:
o Less than .1 acre – 33 parcels
o Between .1 to .25 acres – 117 parcels
o Between .25 to .5 acres – 38 parcels
o Between .5 to 1 acre – 35 parcels
o Between 1 and 5 acres – 40 parcels
o Between 5 and 55 acres – 12 parcels
• Commercial Downtown – 111 vacant parcels
totaling more than 37 acres. The size of the
parcels ranges from .04 to 3.7 acres. The sizes
break down further as follows:
o Less than .1 acre – 21 parcels
o Between .1 to .25 acres – 61 parcels
o Between .25 to .5 acres – 12 parcels
o Between .5 to 1 acre – 11 parcels
o Between 1 and 3.7 acres – 6 parcels
The city has 893 persons without nighttime shelter as of the 2022 Point-in-Time (PIT) Count. The size of shelters in Stockton is based on building and fire code allowances
and there is no maximum number of beds. Government
Code Section 65583(a)(4)(I) requires a minimum of 200
square feet per person to meet the unsheltered need. To address the unsheltered needs of 893 people, this would be a minimum of 184,200 square feet or 4.2 acres, a
number far smaller than the number of vacant acres in the four zoning districts.
The City will amend the Development Code to allow
emergency shelters without discretionary review on
enough suitable parcels in these zoning districts to address the 893 person need within one year of adoption of the
Housing Element (see Program 17).
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1283
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-227
The additional sites where emergency shelters are allowed without discretionary review will meet the following criteria:
• Sites must allow residential uses.
• Sites must be located near amenities and
services that serve people experiencing
homelessness.
• Sites owned by the local government can be
included if the analysis demonstrates that the
sites will be made available for emergency
shelters during the planning period, are suitable
for residential use, and are located near
amenities that serve people experiencing
homelessness.
The City’s municipal code determines the maximum
number of beds for an emergency shelter by Building and Fire Codes. Development standards for emergency
shelters are:
A. Separation Between Structures. Developments
with multiple structures shall provide a 12-foot
separation between those structures.
B. Physical Characteristics.
1. Compliance with applicable State and Local
Uniform Housing and Building Code
requirements.
2. The facility shall have on-site security during
all hours when the shelter is open.
3. Facilities shall provide exterior lighting on
pedestrian pathways and parking lot areas on
the property. Lighting shall reflect away from
residential areas and public streets.
4. Facilities shall provide secure areas for
personal property.
C. Maximum Number of Beds per Facility. The
maximum number of beds per facility shall be
determined and as allowed by Building and Fire
Codes.
D. Limited Terms of Stay. The maximum term of
staying at an emergency shelter is six months in a
consecutive 12-month period.
E. Parking. The emergency shelter shall provide offstreet parking at a ratio of two spaces per facility for staff plus one space per 10 occupants allowed
at the maximum capacity.
F. Emergency Shelter Management. A management
plan is required for all emergency shelters to
address management experience, good neighbor
issues, transportation, client supervision, client
services, and food services. Such plan shall be
submitted to and approved by the Director prior
to operation of the emergency shelter. The plan
shall, at minimum, identify the property owner’s
and operator’s names and contact information,
on-site security, and anti-loitering measures. The
plan shall include a floor plan that demonstrates
compliance with physical standards of this
chapter. The operator of each emergency shelter
shall annually submit the management plan to the
Director with updated information for review and
approval. The City Council may establish a fee by
resolution to cover the administrative cost of
review of the required management plan.
G. Waiting Area. To prevent queuing of shelter
residents off-site, an on-site intake waiting area
shall be provided that is adequate to
accommodate all incoming residents.
H. Proximity. The proximity of an emergency shelter
next to another emergency shelter shall be at
minimum 300 feet.
In addition, Government Code 65583(a)(4) (SB 2)
requires sufficient parking to accommodate all staff
working in the emergency shelter provided that the
standards do not require more parking for emergency
shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone. Currently, the code requires providing offstreet parking at a ratio of two spaces per facility for staff plus one space per 10 occupants allowed at the maximum
capacity. In addition, other standards, including the
proximity standard, need to be updated for consistency
with State law. The City has included Program 15 to revise the standards to ensure compliance with State law.
Low-Barrier Navigation Center
Government Code Section 65662 requires that the
development of Low-Barrier Navigation Centers be
developed as a use by right in zones where mixed uses are allowed or in nonresidential zones that permit multifamily Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1284
BR-228 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
housing. For a navigation center to be considered “low
barrier,” its operation should incorporate best practices to reduce barriers to entry, which may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Permitting the presence of partners if it not a
population-specific site, such as for survivors of
domestic violence or sexual assault, women, or
youth
• Pets
• Ability to store possessions
• Providing privacy, such as private rooms or
partitions around beds in a dormitory setting or
in larger rooms with multiple beds
The City defines a Low-Barrier Navigation Center as
housing-first, low-barrier, service-enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides
temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing. A lowbarrier navigation center development is a use by right in special purpose or commercial zoning districts permitting multifamily dwellings.
Transitional Housing
While SB 2 added specific new requirements for local
governments to meet in terms of planning for emergency
shelter facilities, Government Code Section 65583(a)(5) also states that “transitional housing and supportive
housing shall be considered a residential use of property, and shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone.” State law requires cities and counties to allow
transitional and supportive housing in all zones that allow residential uses.
Transitional housing is designed to assist homeless
individuals and families in moving beyond emergency
shelter to permanent housing. California Health and
Safety Code Section 50675.2(h) defines “transitional
housing” and “transitional housing development” as:
Buildings configured as rental housing
developments, but operated under program
requirements that call for the termination of
assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to
another eligible program recipient at some
predetermined future point in time, which shall be
no less than six months.
The City of Stockton’s Development Code defines
transitional housing as a “use by right” that shall have the same meaning as defined in subdivision (i) of Government Code Section 65583.2. The Government Code section
reads “transitional housing and supportive housing are
permitted in all zones allowing residential uses and are not subject to any restrictions (e.g., occupancy limit) not imposed on similar dwellings (e.g., single family home, apartments) in the same zone in which the transitional
housing and supportive housing is located.” Therefore,
supportive housing is allowed in the city wherever singlefamily and multifamily residential is allowed. The City’s code does not constrain development of transitional
housing.
Supportive Housing
Supportive housing is permanent rental housing linked to a range of support services designed to enable residents to maintain stable housing and lead fuller lives. Typically, a portion of the housing is targeted to people who have risk factors such as homelessness or health challenges
such as mental illness or substance addiction. Supportive housing comes in all shapes and sizes. It could be a
renovated motel offering furnished co-living apartments; a multifamily development where tenants with disabilities live alongside other families with low incomes; a small, more service-intensive building; or scattered-site apartments.
Whatever the configuration, all of the housing allows
tenants to access support services that enable them to live as independently as possible.
California Health and Safety Code Section 65582(f)
defines “supportive housing” as:
Housing with no limit on length of stay, that is
occupied by the target population, and that is
linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the
tenant to retain the housing, improve his or her
health status, maximize their ability to live and,
when possible, to work in the community.
Government Code Section 6565 (a)) requires cities and
counties to consider supportive housing as a residential use allowed in all zones that allow residential uses and mixed use and only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1285
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-229
Additionally, supportive housing must be permitted byright in multifamily, mixed-use, and nonresidential zones allowing multifamily.
The City of Stockton’s Development Code defines
supportive housing as a “use by right” that shall have the same meaning as defined in subdivision (i) of Government Code Section 65583.2. The Government Code section
reads:
Transitional housing and supportive housing are
permitted in all zones allowing residential uses
and are not subject to any restrictions (e.g.,
occupancy limit) not imposed on similar dwellings
(e.g., single family home, apartments) in the same
zone in which the transitional housing and
supportive housing is located.
Therefore, supportive housing is allowed in the city
wherever single-family and multifamily residential is
allowed.
The City’s code does not constrain development of
supportive housing and is in compliance with the
requirements of AB 2162.
Single-Room Occupancy Units
SRO units (referred to in Stockton as co-living units) can provide affordable housing for lower-income individuals, seniors, and persons with disabilities, and can serve as an entry point into the housing market for formerly homeless people. A co-living unit is usually small, between 200 to 350 square feet.
Co-living units are a source of affordable housing in the city. As the city of Stockton has aged, downtown hotels serving overnight visitors became residential hotels, or coliving units, renting rooms by the day, week, or month to very low-income individuals or couples. According to the City of Stockton, as of 2023, there were five residential hotels operating in the downtown central business district of Stockton.
There are a number of residential hotels that are currently vacant due to habitability, housing, and other code
violations. It is unlikely that these hotels will be reopened and operated as hotels as there is significant work needed to get the residential hotels operational for overnight accommodations. The City has acquired some of these
hotels to create housing, such as the Medici Artist Lofts.
There is a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom
apartments that include both affordable and market-rate units. The City has also created additional parking that is needed in downtown Stockton to create an environment
conducive to commercial and retail businesses and
development. The City performs annual inspections of the remaining residential hotels to make sure that these hotels meet minimum health and safety standards.
The Stockton Development Code defines Co-Living
(dwelling unit facilities) as “a permanent housing facility consisting of single-room occupancy units, where each
bedroom is considered a separate living quarter to be
occupied by permanent residents.” The City allows SROs
in CG (Commercial General) and CD (Commercial
Downtown) zones with an Administrative Use Permit.
HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH
SPECIAL NEEDS
Housing for Persons with Disabilities
State housing element law requires jurisdictions to analyze potential and actual constraints on the development,
maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons
with disabilities and demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from
meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities.
In accordance with SB 520 (Chapter 671, Statutes of
2001), the City has analyzed the potential and actual
governmental constraints on the development of housing
for persons with disabilities. Program 14 commits the City to include a State-compliant definition of family in the glossary in the zoning regulations.
Accessibility
The City does not provide any undue or additional
constraints to the development, maintenance, and
improvement of housing for persons with disabilities. The City of Stockton uses Title 24 building laws in its
development of zoning, permitting processes, and
building codes for disabled housing with no additional
building codes adopted. The City makes every effort to
ensure accessibility for persons with disabilities. The City is stringent in its application of Title 24 guidelines and requires all new development to meet the requirements of the law. No additional requirements for parking are
required other than those for the zone in which the housing Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1286
BR-230 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
is being developed, and special concessions can be given to lower the parking requirements for special-needs
housing.
The Building and Housing Board of Appeals deals with
disputes that may arise with special-needs housing. Where issues do arise, citizens, contractors, and others can seek assistance from the City's Building and Housing Board of Appeals. Although the Building and Housing Board of
Appeals cannot waive Title 24 requirements, the Board
can make findings on the use of alternative methods
and/or materials to accommodate disabled access. As of
2023, the application fee required for filing with the
Building Board of Appeals is $373.
The City of Stockton process to retrofit homes for
accessibility follows Title 24 guidelines.
The City of Stockton Building Division enforces Chapter 11 of the California Building Code, Title 24. The Code
provides a mandate that 100 percent of ground-floor
(one-story) dwelling units in buildings consisting of three or more dwelling units be accessible by adaptability.
Adaptability includes such features as wheelchair
clearances in bathrooms, hallways, and kitchen areas,
adjustable lowered countertops, site access, backing for grab bars in shower/bath areas, etc. The disabled tenant, or tenant’s representative, at time of occupancy, can
request of the property owner that the adaptable
provisions be converted to full accessibility. Building permit fees associated with the Title 24 improvements
would be the only fees the City would impose as part of this process.
Reasonable Accommodation
The City adopted a reasonable accommodation
ordinance in 2016, Zoning Ordinance Chapter 16.214,
to establish a formal procedure for individuals with
disabilities seeking equal access to housing to request reasonable accommodation in the application of the
City’s land use and zoning standards, regulations,
policies, and procedures and to establish criteria for
evaluating the requests. An application for reasonable
accommodation must be submitted on a form prescribed
by the Director, or in the form of a letter addressed to the Director. If the project for which the application for
reasonable accommodation is being made requires
approval of another permit under this title, then the
applicant must file the application for reasonable
accommodation together with the application for the other permit, for concurrent review and action.
The decision to grant, grant with modifications, or deny an application for reasonable accommodation is based on a
finding, all of which are required for approval or
conditional approval of a reasonable accommodation:
1. Whether the housing or housing-related facilities that are the subject of the request will be used by an
individual with a disability under the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA).
2. Whether the request for reasonable accommodation
is necessary to make specific housing available to an
individual with a disability under the ADA.
3. Whether the requested reasonable accommodation
would impose an undue financial or administrative
burden on the City.
4. Whether the requested reasonable accommodation
would require a fundamental alteration in the nature
of a City program or law, including, but not limited to, land use and zoning.
5. Whether the requested reasonable accommodation
would be contrary to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or be injurious to the property or
improvements of adjacent properties.
6. Whether the requested reasonable accommodation
adequately considers the physical attributes of the
property and structures.
7. Whether alternative reasonable accommodations
could provide an equivalent level of benefit.
Program 29 proposes to remove two of the findings above that are part of the City’s Reasonable Accommodation
approval process for consistency with State law:
• Whether the requested reasonable
accommodation adequately considers the
physical attributes of the property and structures.
• Whether alternative reasonable
accommodations could provide an equivalent
level of benefit.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1287
POTENTIAL HOUSING CONSTRAINTS BR-231
POTENTIAL
NONGOVERNMENTAL
CONSTRAINTS
The availability and cost of housing is strongly influenced by market forces over which local governments have little or no control. Nonetheless, State law requires that the Housing Element contain a general assessment of these
constraints, which can serve as the basis for actions to offset their effects. The primary nongovernmental
constraints to the development of new housing in Stockton are the availability of financing and development costs.
AVAILABILITY OF FINANCING
Interest rates are determined by national policies and
economic conditions, and there is little that local
governments can do to affect these rates. Jurisdictions can, however, offer interest rate write-downs to extend home purchase opportunities to lower-income
households. In addition, government-insured loan
programs may be available to reduce mortgage downpayment requirements.
The cost of borrowing money to finance the construction of housing or to purchase a house affects the amount of affordably priced housing in Stockton. First-time
homebuyers are the group most impacted by financing
requirements. Higher interest rates increase a
homebuyer’s monthly payment and decrease the range of
housing that a household can afford. Lower interest rates result in a lower cost and lower monthly payments for the homebuyer.
As shown in Figure HE-36, interest rates steadily increased nationwide between 2015 and 2017, increasing 0.2 and
0.3 percent year-over-year for a 30-year fixed-rate
mortgage. Interest rates decreased in 2018 and began
increasing again in 2019. During the start of 2020,
interest rates dropped to a historic low and rose in 2022.
As shown in Figure HE-37, in 2022, the increases in
interest rates month-to-month were as high or higher than the year-over-year increases from 2015 to 2017. Interest rates peaked at 7.0 percent for a 30-year fixed-rate
mortgage and 6.3 percent for a 15-year fixed-rate
mortgage.
Interest rates are currently higher than they have been since 2008. When interest rates rise, the market typically compensates by decreasing housing prices. Similarly,
when interest rates decrease, housing prices begin to rise.
There is often a lag in the market, causing housing prices to remain high when interest rates rise until the market catches up. Lower-income households often find it most
difficult to purchase a home during this time period.
Figure HE-36: Historical Mortgage Rates
United States, January 2015-January 2021
Figure HE-37: Mortgage Rates
United States, January 2022 – February 2023
Mortgage Rates: FRM- Fixed Rate Mortgage
Source: Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey, 2022. 0 1
2 3
4 5
Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 Jan-18 Jan-19 Jan-20 Jan-21
30 - Year FRM 15 - Year FRM
0.00 1.00
2.00 3.00
4.00 5.00
6.00 7.00
8.00 1/1/20222/1/20223/1/20224/1/20225/1/20226/1/20227/1/20228/1/20229/1/2022 10/1/202211/1/202212/1/2022
1/1/20232/1/2023
30-Year FRM 15-Year FRM
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1288
BR-232 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Land Costs
Costs associated with the acquisition of land include both the market price of raw land and the cost of holding the property throughout the development process. Land
acquisition costs can account for over half of the final sales price of new homes in small developments and in areas
where land is scarce.
The main determinant of land value is market demand.
Builders will pay a premium for residential land in a strong market when expected buyers are plentiful. Raw residential land sold for well over per acre with no site improvements in Stockton.
The market is improving and land values are beginning to rise as a result. Based on a recent (December 2022) survey in Stockton, the average price per acre was $213,100.
The survey was based on residential sites listed on
Redfin.com, an online real estate database. The median
lot size was 3.08 acres. There was a wide variety of
locations for the land listed from infill sites, established suburbs, and a few greenfields on the outskirts of the city.
Construction Costs
Housing construction costs can act as a constraint to the affordability of new housing. However, the cost of
construction varies with the type, size, location, and
amenities of the development. “Entry-level” homes have
far fewer amenities than other higher-priced custom
homes. The Craftsman Book Company is a resource that
provides construction cost estimates for specific
geographic areas by ZIP code. According to the
Craftsman Book Company’s 2022 estimates, construction
costs for a single-family home are approximately $151 per square foot. This is based on costs calculated for a 2,000- square-foot, wood-framed, single-story, four-cornered
home, of good quality construction and including a twocar garage and forced-air heating/cooling in Stockton.
Estimated total construction costs for such a home are
$302,248. These construction costs include labor,
materials, and equipment but do not include costs of
buying land.2The increased use of prefabricated factorybuilt or manufactured housing, which is permitted in all residential districts throughout the city (consistent with 2 2022 National Building Cost Manual and 2022 952-02,03,04,05,07, 09, and 10 zip code modifiers, Craftsman Book Company.
California State law), may provide for lower-priced
housing by reducing construction and labor costs.
According to the Craftsman Book Company’s 2022
estimates costs for multifamily construction are
approximately $121 per square foot. This is based on
costs calculated for a three-story building in Stockton with 40 units and an average unit size of 1,000 square feet
each. The calculation is for a wood or light steel frame structure, including forced air heating and cooling and constructed of good quality materials. The estimated total construction costs for each unit are $104,573, and total construction costs for the building are $4,420,124. These construction costs include labor, materials, and equipment but do not include costs of buying land or off-street
parking.1 Additionally, the City received a job value
estimate with construction costs for a 27-unit multifamily three-story residential building. The one-bedroom, 27-unit project estimates construction costs at $192,253 per unit.
Although the economy is currently fairly strong some
builders are still reluctant to start new construction projects because of construction costs and interest rates are on the rise. There is little that the City can do to mitigate the impacts of high construction costs except by avoiding local amendments to uniform building codes that unnecessarily increase construction costs without significantly adding to health, safety, or construction quality. Because
construction costs are similar in the city to those in other Central Valley areas, the cost of construction alone is not considered a major constraint to housing production.
Available Dry Utilities
Dry utilities, including cable, electricity, and telephone service, are available to all areas within the city.
• Electricity: Pacific Gas and Electric Company
• Mobile Coverage: AT&T and Comcast
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1289
EVALUATION BR-233
EVALUATION 7
The following section reviews and evaluates the City’s
progress in implementing the 2015-2023 Housing
Element. This section analyzes and effectiveness of policies and programs for the previous Housing Element planning
period. This section also contains recommendations for
program changes to address housing needs for the 2023-
2031 planning period.
During the 2015-2023 Housing Element planning period,
the City completed or embarked on multiple major longrange planning projects including the General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, zoning consistency work,
and Comprehensive Development Code update. The
Shape Stockton efforts are currently underway which
include this Housing Element Update, Housing Action
Plan, Neighborhood Action Plans as well as the
Comprehensive Development Code Update. The City also
experienced the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The City implemented many of the programs it hoped to
accomplish during the 2015-2023 planning period, but
some programs did not move forward as much as
expected. In addition, state law regarding housing has
changed substantially since the adoption of the 2015-
2023 Housing Element. This evaluation focuses on
maintaining the programs that will be most effective to meeting housing needs and adding programs that address
the updates to state law. Table HE-67 below provides a
detailed review of progress towards implementation of the 2015-2023 Housing Element programs. The element
must also provide a cumulative evaluation of the
effectiveness of past goals, policies, and related actions in meeting the housing needs of special needs populations
(e.g., elderly, persons with disabilities, large households, female headed households, farmworkers, and persons
experiencing homelessness).
• In 2021, the City applied for HomeKey funds and
received a total of $4,752,284. Of the
$4,752,284, about $4,072,280 were used
towards the rehabilitation of a 15-unit apartment
complex for victims of domestic violence. The rest
of the funds ($680,004) were allocated to Town
Center Studios, a 40-unit permanent supportive
housing solution that works to end homelessness
for Stockton residents.
• To ensure safe and habitable emergency shelters
and facilities, the City allocated funding towards
the rehabilitation of the Gospel Center Rescue
Mission, the Community Medical Centers
building, and the Women’s Center Youth & Family
Services facilities and the restrooms at Oak Park,
and the acquisition, construction, and
rehabilitation funding for temporary or transitional
shelters.
• During the 5th planning cycle, the City allocated
a total of $65,880 in CDBG funds towards the
Disability Resource Agency for Independent Living
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1290
5-234 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
(DRAIL) as well as Community Center for the Blind
and Visually Impaired (CBVI).
• Between 2017 and 2021, the City of Stockton
consistently received CDBG, HOME and ESG
funds totaling approximately 44.3 million in funds.
These funds have been allocated towards gap
financing for affordable housing developers,
Single-Family Repair Loan Program, Single-Family
Emergency Repair Program. As well as supporting
fair housing activities and funding local
emergency shelters homeless services, rapid rehousing, and rental assistance service. • Sierra Vista, located in south Stockton, south of
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (formerly
Charter Way), is home to approximately 274
families. To maintain the affordability of the Sierra
Vista apartments, the City committed two million
dollars to phase two of redevelopment.
• To provide housing and supportive services to
special-needs households and individuals the City
of Stockton’s allocated a total $17,407,480 in
Homeless Assistance Program (HHAP) and
Permanent Local Housing Assistance program
(PLHA) funds.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1291
EVALUATION BR-235
Table HE-67: Review of 2015-2023 Housing Element Programs
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
Program 1: Adequate Sites Monitoring
Adequate Sites Monitoring: The City shall biennially
update its vacant land inventory, including an updated
inventory of potential infill sites (smaller vacant and underutilized parcels). The City shall make the updated inventory available to the public and development
community via the City’s website.
The City continuously updates its website to maintain its vacant and underutilized parcel list. Economic
Development and Community Development staff continue
to be responsible for updating the vacant/underutilized database with vacant/underutilized parcel list.
Continue, combine with Program 2
Program 2: No Net Loss Zoning
For any downzoning or project approval for fewer
housing units and/or at lower densities than assumed in the Housing Element, the City shall make findings that
there is still adequate capacity to meet the remaining
housing need, consistent with “no-net-loss” zoning law
(AB 2069).
The City reviews all rezoning applications and conducts No Net Loss findings, when appropriate, as required by
Government Code Section 65683.
Continue, combine with Program 1
Program 3: Settlement Agreement Implementation
The City shall develop a comprehensive housing strategy to meet the housing targets identified in the Settlement Agreement. The comprehensive strategy shall include
measures to enable development of 4,400 residential
units in the Greater Downtown Area by 2035. Potential
strategies could include adopting less restrictive zoning in the Downtown and Greater Downtown or expanding the
Commercial Downtown (CD) zoning district to allow
greater densities in the Greater Downtown.
The City continuously promotes the successful completion of its agreed-upon number of required affordable housing units as outlined in the City’s (Affordable) Settlement Agreement. During the planning period, the City gained
261 new units, of which 174 units are affordable units, with these 6 completed housing projects in the Greater
Downtown:
1. Cal Weber, completed in 2016, 40 affordable units
2. Veteran’s Anchor Village, completed in 2018, 51
units
3. Medici Artist Lofts, completed in 2019, 34 units
4. Liberty Square (formerly Hunter Street Apartments),
completed in 2022, 74 affordable units
5. Grand View Village, to be completed in 2023, 75
affordable units
6. Crossway Residences, multiple sites completed in
2020 and 2021, 41 units of affordable supportive
housing
Another completed project outside of the Greater
Downtown is:
1. Sierra Vista Phase I and Phase II, completed in 2020, 215 affordable units
In 2020, the City updated its Five Year Consolidated Plan, describing the City’s plan to create additional affordable units. The City also completed San Joaquin Community
Response to Homelessness Strategic Plan with the goal of Modify and continue
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1292
BR-236 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
enabling over 200 new units of permanent housing by
2025.
The City is drafting a Housing Action Plan (HAP)
concurrently with its 6th Cycle Housing Element, with
anticipated completion in 2023. The HAP is funded by a
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant.
In addition, remaining obligations under the settlement agreement shifted with the City’s adoption of the Climate Action Plan in 2014 and the General Plan update in
2018.
The City has taken several other actions already,
including parking reductions for housing (zero off-site required quarter mile of ACE Cabral Station), increased residential densities in the Greater Downtown area,
streamlined multifamily housing applications – multifamily is now allowed by-right, fee waivers, and Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for downtown
infill infrastructure.
Program 4: Public Facilities Repair and Replacement
Through implementation of the Consolidated Plan, and
upon funding availability, the City shall continue to
identify and target low-income neighborhoods for the
expansion of existing facilities/infrastructure, replacement of deteriorating facilities, and construction of new
facilities/infrastructure to increase quality of life for Stockton residents.
Since the 2015-2016 fiscal year (FY), the City has funded more than 30 public facility projects with CDBG funds. In the 2018-2019 FY, the City allocated $900,000 in CDBG
funds for the Downtown Infrastructure Infill Incentive
Program. In the 2021-2022 FY, the City continued to fund the Downtown Infrastructure Infill Incentive Program, as well as rehabilitated the sleeping quarters and bathroom at the Gospel Center Rescue Mission, the Community
Medical Centers building, and the Women’s Center Youth
& Family Services facilities, which serve domestic violence victims and homeless youth, renovated the restrooms at
Oak Park, and the acquisition, construction, and
rehabilitation funding for temporary or transitional
shelters.
Continue
Program 5: Study Fee Deferral Program for Affordable
Housing
The City shall develop a program for consideration of
adoption by the City Council to defer fees for affordable housing until certificate of occupancy.
The Affordable Housing Nexus and Linkage Fee report
was prepared in 2020-2021. The City decided to not
continue to phase two, which would have been adoption
of a fee deferral program, as the housing market, which was already causing housing costs to skyrocket, couldn't handle an added fee. It didn't make sense to add a new
fee and still encourage construction. The City is drafting a Housing Action Plan (HAP) concurrently with its 6th Cycle Housing Element, with an anticipated completion date of March 2023. The HAP is funded by a LEAP grant.
Delete
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1293
EVALUATION BR-237
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
Program 6: Coordination with the Housing Authority of
San Joaquin County
The City shall continue to work closely with the Housing Authority of San Joaquin County in providing assisted
housing through the Housing Voucher Program (Section
8), and in providing housing and supportive services to special needs households and individuals.
The City continuously works with the Housing Authority of San Joaquin County in providing Housing Choice
Vouchers to residents. In 2017, 54 of the Conway Homes
received permits for rehabilitation. In 2018, the City
committed two million dollars to phase two of the Sierra Vista apartments, which included 115 new units. The City approved the distribution of funding from the Housing
and Homeless Assistance Program (HHAP) (in 2020 and
2021) and the Permanent Local Housing Assistance
program (PLHA) (in 2021) to provide housing and
supportive services to special-needs households and
individuals.
Three rounds of HHAP funding have been released. The
City of Stockton’s current allocations total $17,407,480:
• Round 1: $6,460,266
• Round 2: $3,053,944
• Round 3: $7,893,270
Round 1 and Round 2 funds have been received and are
in the process of being disbursed to homeless service
providers and affordable housing developers to meet a
variety of needs, including shelter expansions and
operations and new permanent housing projects.
On June 21, 2022, the City approved a multi-year
spending plan for HHAP funds and authorized the
submission of the HHAP Round 3 application. On
September 4, 2022, CAL ICH approved the City’s request
for HHAP Round 3 funds; however, the formal agreement
to accept and appropriate funds is still in process.
Continue and expand to address Assembly Bill (AB) 686,
including promoting voucher use in high and moderate
resource areas (as identified by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC)/HCD).
Program 7: State and Federal Funding
The City shall continue to apply annually for Federal
entitlement funds under the CDBG, HOME and ESG
Programs, and shall pursue additional State and Federal funding that becomes available during the planning
period. The City shall support housing organizations and affordable housing developers by assisting in applications for funding, drafting letters of support and resolutions, and identifying potential sites for affordable housing.
Funding sources are evaluated annually. In the 2017-
2018 fiscal year (FY), the City of Stockton received a total of $5,533,127 from the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the following
are the entitlement allocations:
• CDBG - $3,451,760
• HOME - $1,190, 818
• ESG - $283,028
• Special “extra: allocation - $607,521
In FY 2018-2019, the City received a total of $5,501,322 from HUD, the following are the entitlement allocations:
• CDBG - $3,451,760
• HOME - $1,759,186
Continue
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1294
BR-238 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
• ESG - $290,376
In FY 2019-2020, the City received a total of $5,234,705 from HUD, the following are the entitlement allocations:
• CDBG - $3,329,801
• HOME - $1,612,015
• ESG - $292,889
In FY 2020-2021, the City received a total of
$16,240,671 from HUD, the following are the entitlement allocations:
• CDBG - $3,427,828
• HOME - $1,593,808
• ESG - $292,582
• CDBG CARES Act funding - $1,859,563
• CDBG CV 1 - $2,016,786
• ESG CV1/CV2 - $7,050,104
In FY 2021-2022, the City received a total of
$11,822,452 from HUD, the following are the entitlement allocations:
• CDBG - $3,388,867
• HOME - $1,760,529
• HOME ARPA - $6,380,677
• ESG - $292,379
The City also received Redevelopment Successor Agency
Repayments to CDBG every year, portions of which were
allocated to the Housing Loan Pool.
The distribution of funds varies and are as follows: HOME funds are allocated as gap financing for affordable
housing developers through an annual competitive
application process. CDBG funds are used for the SingleFamily Repair Loan Program, the Single-Family Emergency Repair Program, and to support housing
organizations, such as San Joaquin Fair Housing. ESG
funds are allocated to local emergency shelters homeless services, rapid re-housing, and rental assistance services.
In 2021, the City applied for or received funding from a number of State and federal funding sources, including
REAP, HomeKey, PLHA, and HHAP.
• -HHAP $17,407,480
• -REAP (SJCOG) $621,150
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1295
EVALUATION BR-239
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
• -HomeKey-2 (2022 - Villa D' Flore) $4,072,280
• -HomeKey-1 (Town Center Studios) $680,004
• -PLHA $10,268,580 ($2,053,716/yr over 5 yrs)
• -LEAP (HCD) $750,000
• -REAP 2.0 (SJCOG NOFA coming soon)
Program 8: Continue to Operate Down Payment
Assistance Program
The City shall continue to administer its Down Payment
Assistance Program for low-income first-time homebuyers using a variety of funding sources including CDBG and
HOME funds.
The City continues to operate the Down Payment
Assistance Program, which lends up to $10,000 in
assistance, or 5 percent of the purchase price plus the closing costs and accessibility repairs for persons with physical impairments. No loans were awarded between
2017 and 2023. In 2022, the City decided to merge this
program with the Home Key program.
Combine with Program 7 and continue
Program 9: Priority Sewer and Water Service for
Affordable Housing
The City shall adopt policies and procedures to provide priority sewer and water service for developments that
include lower income housing units, consistent with State law (Government Code Section 65589.7).
The City intends to implement this program as part of the currently underway Development Code Update.
Continue
Program 10: Inclusionary Housing Evaluation
The City shall conduct a study to investigate the feasibility of an Inclusionary Housing Program. The study shall
include an analysis of the potential options and
requirements, such as the appropriate percentage of
affordable units, income eligibility criteria, methods by which developers could meet the requirements,
appropriate resale restrictions on ownership units, and time frame for affordability of units. Based on the findings of the study, the City Council shall consider adoption of an inclusionary housing program, as appropriate.
In 2020, the City contracted with consultants to conduct a study for the feasibility of an Inclusionary Housing
Program. This study was completed in 2021. The study
concluded that the current market in the city doesn’t
support an inclusionary requirement. Further
consideration of a voluntary inclusionary requirement or potential inclusion of affordable units as part of
development agreements are being considered by the city moving forward.
Delete
Program 11: Infill Strategy
The City shall develop a strategy to facilitate the
development of infill projects in the Downtown and
Greater Downtown Areas. The Infill Strategy shall identify actions and incentives to promote infill development.
These strategies and incentives could include allowing less restrictive height limits, setbacks, and parking
requirements; planning infrastructure improvements; and streamlining the permitting process.
The Downtown Infrastructure Infill Incentive Program,
approved in 2015, provides financial incentives to eligible parties in developing new market-rate residential,
commercial, or mixed-use projects in Downtown Stockton.
This program will expire in 2025, unless extended by the City Council.
During the 2018-2019 fiscal year (FY), The City allocated $900,000 in CDBG funds for the Downtown Infrastructure
Infill Incentive Program. Additionally, during the 2018- 2019 FY, the City was awarded a $600,000
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Brownfields
Assessment Grant in partnership with San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) and the City's Successor Agency.
The City contracted with a consultant in 2019 to prepare Continue
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1296
BR-240 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
a Brownfields Site Revitalization Program. Assessment
activities will continue to focus on the city's downtown and waterfront. The grant award is split evenly between
evaluating sites with hazardous substances and petroleum contamination; it will be used to conduct six preliminary (Phase I) and five advanced (Phase II) environmental site assessments and to prepare an area-wide plan and three
site-specific plans. Grant funds also will be used to update the site inventory, prioritize sites, and support community outreach activities.
Several of the zoning strategies have already been
implemented as part of the 2020-2022 Phased Code
update, and remaining items will also be implemented in the 2023 Code overhaul.
Program 12: Infill Site Assembly
The City shall actively work with local property owners and developers to assist in the consolidation and assembly of small infill parcels for residential projects, particularly as it related to parcels listed in the sites inventory and parcels with multiple owners. The City shall process lot mergers ministerially, and shall offer incentives, such as expedited processing, in addition to the incentives already offered to infill development.
The City continued to look for opportunities to work with and assist local property owners and developers in the
consolidation and assembly of small infill parcels for
residential projects, but not many consolidations occurred.
As specified in Stockton Municipal Code Section
16.200.030, lot consolidation requests are processed
ministerially. The City is updating infill requirements in the Development Code as part of the Comprehensive
Development Code Update. The City is also working on
mapping potential infill sites that are vacant and ready for development as part of the Housing Action Plan, current underway.
Continue
Program 13: Development Outside Infill Areas
The City shall submit for City Council adoption
amendments to the General Plan to ensure that
development outside City limits as of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement does not occur in a manner
that is out of balance with infill development (i.e.,
development within existing city limits). These proposed amendments shall include measures limiting the granting of entitlements for projects (i.e., specific plan, master plan, or other projects of significance) outside the City limits until firm, effective milestones that will assure that specified levels of infill development, jobs-housing
balance goals, and greenhouse gas (GHG) and vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) reduction goals, once established, are met. As part of this process, the City shall consider the impacts on the cost, supply, and affordability of housing.
The City adopted its 2040 General Plan in 2018. It
includes goals and actions on greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) that stem from the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) and will continue to be implemented through entitlement and the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) projects review. This Plan
includes these actions:
• Action LU-6.1F: Evaluate and implement
adjustments to the Public Facilities Fee (PFF)
structure to encourage development in areas
where infrastructure is already present and
ensure that non-infill development pays its fair
share of anticipated citywide capital facilities and
operational costs.
• Action LU-6.2A: Develop and implement an infill
incentive program that encourages infill
development through expedited permitting,
Delete
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1297
EVALUATION BR-241
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
changes in fee structures, prioritizing
infrastructure improvements in infill areas,
property owner and/or landlord incentives to
maintain property and reduce blight, and/or
other strategies. As part of this program, the City
defines and prioritizes categories of infill types
based on land use and residential density or
nonresidential intensity.
• Action LU-6.2B: Ensure prioritization of
development and redevelopment of vacant,
underutilized, and blighted infill areas be
considered through strategies such as zoning
changes and strategies to avoid gentrification.
• Action LU-6.5A: Require preparation of a fiscal
impact analysis for large development projects
and annexations to ensure a full accounting of
infrastructure and public service costs and
require fiscal mitigations when necessary.
As part of this program, the City defines and prioritizes categories of infill types based on land use and residential density or nonresidential intensity.
Program 14: Development Code Amendment for
Compliance with State Law
The City shall amend the Development Code to allow care homes for six persons or fewer in the RE zone to fully
comply with State law, which requires State licensed
group homes for six or fewer to be treated as a single
family home.
This program was completed in 2020. However, state law
has changed and new requirement will need to be
addressed.
Combine with Program 15 and modify to address current
State law
Program 15: Review Development Code Standards for
Possible Revision
Following the Comprehensive General Plan Update, the
City shall review and evaluate the Development Code for consistency and shall explore ways to maximize housing
opportunities on small lots. Possible changes to the
Development Code might include:
• Reducing the minimum lot area required for a
PUD or the possibility of creating an alternative
zoning designation for smaller lot developments
of less than 2 acres. The purpose of this
alternative zoning designation would be to allow
different development standards to permit higher
densities in infill areas.
Since adoption of the 2040 General Plan in 2018, the
City has amended the Development Code in two phases
to remove AUP requirements for high multifamily
residential development citywide, allow accessory
dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) with flexible development standards, reduce or
eliminate parking for specific housing developments,
maximized local Density Bonuses to allow 100% bonuses,
and increased allowable densities. The City completed
additional amendments related to Zoning Map and
General Plan inconsistencies in a third phase in 2022.
The City is partway through a Comprehensive
Development Code Update. Completion is anticipated in
2023.
Modify to remove completed items, add any new State
law requirements. The modified program will be
implemented through the currently underway
Comprehensive Development Code Update.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1298
BR-242 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
• Reviewing site development standards to see if
there are ways to use space more effectively in
order to develop more units and usable open
space.
• Only permitting single-family homes within RM
and RH zones for isolated parcels that cannot
feasibly be developed in a more intense fashion.
• Reviewing development standards for homes on
small lots (e.g., reduced setbacks, parking, yard
requirements).
• Removing the AUP requirement for high density
residential development in the Greater
Downtown.
• Reducing the minimum lot area required for a
PUD or the possibility of creating an alternative
zoning designation for smaller lot developments
of less than 2 acres. The purpose of this
alternative zoning designation would be to allow
different development standards to permit higher
densities in infill areas.
Program 16: Monitor Article 34 Authorization
The City shall request voter approval on a future ballot for its Article 34 Authorization, which expires in 2020.
Thereafter, the City shall annually monitor the number of remaining units allowed under its Article 34 authorization and schedule a new election when needed to limit the
lack of authorization as a constraint to the development of affordable housing.
Measure K, which required a simple majority, passed with
74.86% of the electorate participating in the 2018
election. The election results were ratified by the Stockton City Council at the regularly scheduled meeting on
December 18, 2018. The City continues to monitor the
remaining number of units authorized. SCA-2 was signed
into law in 2022, which will place a repeal of Article 34 on the 2024 California ballot.
Delete
Program 17: Fiscally-Positive Impact Fees
The City shall develop and adopt impact fees on new
development or other ongoing funding mechanisms (e.g.,
community facilities districts) in accordance with State law to ensure that all development outside the existing City limits as of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement (i.e., non-infill areas) is fiscally-positive to the City.
Specific details of the fee structure shall be determined as part of the comprehensive strategy for implementing the Settlement Agreement. As part of this process, the City shall consider the impacts on the cost, supply, and
affordability of housing and ensure that fees do not
unduly constrain housing development.
Approved in 2018, the Greater Downtown Stockton
Residential Development Public Facilities Fees (PFFs)
Exemption Program provides a waiver for certain PFFs for all new residential development within the Greater
Downtown Stockton area. The Citywide Affordable
Housing Development Public Facilities Fees Exemption
Program provides an exemption for certain PFFs for new
affordable housing developments within city limits. For other developments that do not qualify under these two
programs, the City's Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan
(SESP) provides a fee reduction for single-family and
multifamily residential projects and a 50% fee reduction for commercial and industrial projects within city limits.
The SESP Program will expire when the City completes the Master Infrastructure Plans and PFF Nexus Study, and
Modify and continue
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1299
EVALUATION BR-243
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
when the new fees are in effect. The City is considering modifying this program to only address multi-family
projects.
Program 18: Preserve At-Risk Units
The City shall continue to work with owners of “at-risk” projects to discuss the timing of a possible sale and
potential sales price. The City shall ensure owners have met the tenant noticing requirements as set forth in
California Government Code Sections 65863.10 and
65863.11. The City shall contact non-profit housing
providers that work in the Stockton area to see if any are interested in acquiring and rehabilitating “at-risk”
projects. Assuming there is interest, the City shall provide technical assistance as needed and funding as available to these housing providers.
During the 5th Housing Element Cycle, there were four
affordable housing projects with a total of 552 units at risk of conversion prior to December 31, 2025:
• Steamboat Landing (150 units, 2023)
• Village East (190 units, 2022)
• Hammer Lane Village (130 units, 2017)
• Silvercrest (82 units, 2016)
Continue and update to comply with current State law
Program 19: Housing Rehabilitation Programs
The City shall continue to administer its owner-occupied loan program and emergency repair program using a
variety of funding sources including CDBG and HOME
funds.
Governmental Constraints
The City continues to administer its owner-occupied
rehabilitation loan program and emergency repair
program, including the Single-Family Loan Program and
the Single-Family Emergency Repair Program. The City
uses HUD funds to operate these programs.
Continue
Program 20: Code Enforcement Programs
The City shall continue to inspect housing units in targeted areas to check for building code violations. In situations where properties cannot be rehabilitated, the City will continue to enforce the removal and replacement of
substandard units.
The City continued to inspect housing units in targeted areas to check for building code violations throughout the planning period.
Continue
Program 21: Neighborhood Stabilization Program Funds
The City shall use the remaining Neighborhood
Stabilization Program funds to rehabilitate foreclosed
properties.
The program’s funds were used to purchase and
rehabilitate foreclosed properties. In 2017, the City
acquired and/or rehabilitated six apartment complexes.
Delete
Program 22: Point-in-Time Homeless Count
The City shall continue to participate in the countywide Point-in-Time homeless count to determine the number
and characteristics of both sheltered and unsheltered
homeless in San Joaquin County.
The City collaborated with the San Joaquin Continuum of Care (CoC) for the 2019 Point‐in‐Time Count (PIT). The
City continues to work with the CoC to determine the
appropriate time to conduct the next PIT homeless count, considering the circumstances of the COVID-19
pandemic. This effort will continue but this program does not need to be included in the Housing Element so will be deleted.
Delete
Program 23: Continue to Support Organizations Assisting Homeless Persons
Continue to Support Organizations Assisting Homeless
Persons: The City shall annually apply for and continue to pursue State and Federal funds available to the City,
private donations, and volunteer assistance to support
The City has received ESG funds from HUD every year
since 2016, as detailed earlier in this table. The City allocates ESG funds to local emergency shelter homeless services, rapid re-housing, rental assistance services, and the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).
As part of the 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan update
Continue
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1300
BR-244 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
homeless shelters. The City shall continue to provide
financial assistance from its Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding to homeless service providers and continue to support additional development of shelter facilities as requested by shelter providers. In addition, the City shall review the need for additional shelter facilities and
services when it updates its Consolidated Plan.
completed in 2020, the City reviewed and acknowledged
the need to support the acquisition, rehabilitation, or construction of emergency shelter facilities.
Program 24: Reasonable Accommodation Public
Outreach
The City shall prepare public information brochures and website information on reasonable accommodations for
disabled persons and translate the materials to provide information to residents with language barriers, The City shall make this information available at the public counter and distribute the materials to community groups and
organizations that represent persons with disabilities.
All City-funded affordable housing projects and
supportive service programs affirmatively further fair
housing by marketing the projects/programs to those
least likely to apply. The marketing materials are
forwarded to agencies that target individuals with
disabilities, homeless persons, and low-income
households of various ethnicities and backgrounds.
Continue, combine with Program 27
Program 25: Continue to Assist the Disabled in
Community Development Block Grant Project Areas
The City shall continue to include special provisions for housing the disabled in CDBG project areas, including
mobility grants for homes (e.g., Emergency Repair
Program) and handicapped accessibility features.
The City funded the Disability Resource Agency for
Independent Living (DRAIL) with $30,000 allocated in
CDBG funds in the 2018-2019 fiscal year (FY) and
$15,000 in the 2019-2020 FY. The City also provided
$7,550 in the 2019-2020 FY and $13,330 in the 2020-
2021 FY of CDBG funding to the Community Center for
the Blind and Visually Impaired (CBVI).
Continue
Program 26: Assist Farm Workers
The City shall continue to provide ongoing assistance to farm laborers by working with the San Joaquin Housing
Authority, San Joaquin County, agricultural employers,
farm labor housing advocates, and the development
community to develop affordable, decent housing for
farm workers.
The City continued to work with the San Joaquin Housing Authority, San Joaquin County, agricultural employers,
farm labor housing advocates, and the development
community to identify opportunities to develop affordable, decent housing for farm workers.
Continue
Program 27: Housing for Persons with Developmental
Disabilities
The City shall work with the Valley Mountain Regional
Center to implement an outreach program that informs
families within the city on housing and services available for persons with developmental disabilities. The program could include the development of an informational
brochure, posting information on the City’s website,
and/or conducting workshops.
The City continued to work with the Valley Mountain
Regional Center to implement an outreach program.
The City has provided capital and operating funding to
nonprofit developers to encourage the development of
new housing for persons with disabilities, including those with developmental disabilities, and for the improvement of existing housing units occupied by persons with
disabilities. There hasn’t been as much funding for this type of project in recent years.
Continue, combine with Program 24
Program 28: Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing
The City shall review and update its Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Report every five years.
The City updated its Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Report in 2020.
Combine into a new fair housing program and continue
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1301
EVALUATION BR-245
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
Program 29: Fair Housing Referrals and Brochures
The City shall continue to provide funds from its CDBG
Program to San Joaquin County Fair Housing to provide
fair housing counseling and education and outreach
efforts to city residents. In addition to providing contact information for San Joaquin Fair Housing on the City’s
website (under the Housing Division), the City shall
continue to make referrals to Fair Housing as issues/cases come to the City’s attention. The City shall also work with Fair Housing to periodically review and update fair
housing brochures that are provided to the public and
posted to the City’s website. The City shall distribute fair housing information at City offices, the library, community centers, and other community facilities.
The City continuously provided CDBG funding to San
Joaquin County Fair Housing. The City continued to
coordinate with San Joaquin County Fair Housing and
provided resources and contact information on the City’s website. Staffing resource limitations have prevented
additional accomplishments under this program.
Continue and expand to address AB 686
Program 30: Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)
Program.
The City shall continue to provide programs for property owners to finance the purchase and installation of
infrastructure improvements to their properties with no up-front costs for: renewable energy, energy and water
efficiency improvements, water conservation upgrades,
and/or electric vehicle charging.
The City continued to offer the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program.
Continue
Program 31: Green-Up Stockton
The City shall continue to encourage voluntary energy
assessments for existing housing units built prior to
November 1, 2002. The City shall continue to work with
community services agencies and PG&E and other
funding sources to identify funding and incentivize
residential energy efficiency projects.
The City continued to encourage voluntary energy
assessments for existing housing units.
Continue
Program 32: Weatherization Activities
The City shall advertise local weatherization programs by posting information on the City website and distributing fliers and brochures, and shall refer elderly homeowners, low-income households within certain income limits, and the general public, to agencies offering weatherization programs.
The City uses HUD funding for the owner-occupied
Single-Family Repair Loan Program and the Single-Family Emergency Repair Program, which includes
weatherization activities. The programs are advertised on the City’s website.
Continue
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1302
BR-246 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM STATUS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE, MODIFY,
OR DELETE
Program 33: Annual Housing Element Implementation
Reporting
The City shall review and report annually on the
implementation of Housing Element programs for the
prior calendar year and present the annual report to the City Council at a public hearing before submitting the
annual report to the Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD) and the Office of
Planning and Research (OPR).
The City annually presents the Annual Housing Element
report to the City Council at a public hearing.
Delete
Program 34: Annual Staff Review
The City shall conduct annual staff meetings to review the City’s progress in implementing the Housing Element and addressing housing issues, especially issues relating to affordable housing and special needs housing. The City
shall use these meetings to coordinate Housing Element
implementation with all City departments (e.g., Public
Works, Fire, Police, Economic Development, and
Recreation).
The City conducts annual staff meetings with
departmental staff, particularly Economic Development
(ED) and Community Development (CD), to communicate
regularly on issues related to the Housing Element and
addressing housing issues in Stockton. In 2020, CD staff launched an initiative, alongside ED, to create the City's first Housing Action Plan (HAP). The City is drafting it concurrently with its 6th Cycle Housing Element, with an anticipated completion date of March 2023. The HAP is
funded by a Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant.
Delete
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1303
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-1
APPENDIX A: LAND
INVENTORY ANALYSIS A
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1304
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1305
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-3
Table A-1: Sites Inventory
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
1-1
348 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733001 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 5 6 Yes No No Yes 1-2
338 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733002 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 5 6 Yes No No Yes 1-3
326 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733003 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 5 6 Yes No No Yes 1-4
318 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733004 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 5 6 Yes No No Yes 1-5
115 S MONROE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733020 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.73 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 6 38 44 Yes No No Yes 1-6
248 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733008 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.07 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 5th 1 3 4 Yes No No Yes 1-7
248 W MARKET ST &&
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733009 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.05 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 2 3 Yes No No Yes 1-8
240 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733010 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 5 6 Yes No No Yes 1-9
226 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733011 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 5 6 Yes No No Yes 1-10 220 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733012 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 5 6 Yes No No Yes 1-11 214 W MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733013 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.06 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 2 3 Yes No No Yes 1-12 103 S MADISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13733014 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.09 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 4 5 Yes No No Yes 1-13 115 S MADISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13733015 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.09 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 4 5 Yes No No Yes 1-14 119 S MADISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13733016 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 2 8 10 Yes No No Yes 1-15 125 S MADISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13733017 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 2 8 10 Yes No No Yes 1-16 126 S MONROE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733018 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.15 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 8 9 Yes No No Yes 1-17 124 S MONROE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13733019 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 2 8 10 Yes No No Yes 1-18 855 W WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14519003 Yes, 1-18 through 1-21 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 1.97 Vacant Yes - City Owned 10 56 66 South Pointe Site. Capacity based on RFP.
Yes No Yes Yes
1-19 833 W WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14527006 Yes, 1-18 through 1-21 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 3.73 Vacant Yes - City Owned 18 105 123 South Pointe Site. Capacity based on RFP.
Yes No Yes Yes
1-20 705 W WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14527009 Yes, 1-18 through 1-21 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 3.08 Vacant Yes - City Owned 15 87 102 South Pointe Site. Capacity based on RFP.
Yes No Yes Yes
1-21 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 14527010 Yes, 1-18 through 1-21 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.29 Vacant Yes - City Owned 2 7 9 South Pointe Site.
Capacity based on RFP.
Yes No No Yes
1-22 537 N ARGONAUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13525034 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.16 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 1-23 835 W FREMONT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13544213 Commercial CN(CORE) 20 136 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No Yes Yes 1-24 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 13545029 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 10 10 No No Yes Yes 1-25 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 13545030 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 10 10 No No Yes Yes 1-26 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 13545032 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 No No Yes Yes 1-27 433 N STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13545038 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 No No Yes Yes 1-28 137 W OAK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13719006 Administrative Professional CO(CORE) 20 136 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 1-29 604 N COMMERCE ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13719021 Administrative Professional CO(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 1-30 528 N VAN BUREN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13720204 High Density Residential RH(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 18 18 Yes No No Yes 1-31 522 N VAN BUREN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13720217 Commercial CN(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 1-32 519 N LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13721408 Commercial CG(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No Yes Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1306
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-4 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
1-33 525 W FREMONT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13721411 Commercial CG(CORE) 20 136 0.33 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 20 20 Yes No Yes Yes 1-34 530 W FREMONT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13725011 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 No No Yes Yes 1-35
504 W FREMONT ST
&& STOCKTON CA
95203
13725016 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 No No Yes Yes 1-36 518 W FREMONT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13725027 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.29 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 17 17 No No Yes Yes 1-38 321 W WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 13727023 Parks and Recreation CD(CORE) 20 136 1.24 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 75 75 Yes No Yes Yes 1-39 109 S VAN BUREN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13736026 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.54 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 3 29 32 Yes No No Yes 1-40 120 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13736027 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.3 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 17 18 Yes No No Yes 1-41
401 W WASHINGTON
ST STOCKTON CA
95203
13736028 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17
and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.13 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 2 5 7 Yes No No Yes 1-42 102 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13736039 Yes, 1-1 through 1-17 and 1-39 through 1-42 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.21 0.4464 Vacant YES - Special District-Owned 4th and 5th 1 11 12 Yes No No Yes 1-43 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 13736058 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.22 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Yes No No Yes 1-46
625 N SAN JOAQUIN
ST STOCKTON CA
95202
13906014 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 1-47 613 N GRANT ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13922307 High Density Residential CD(CORE) 20 136 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 1-48 622 N STANISLAUS ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13922312 High Density Residential CD(CORE) 20 136 0.15 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No Yes 1-49 845 E OAK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13922509 High Density Residential CD(CORE) 20 136 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 13 13 Yes No No Yes 1-50 831 E OAK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13922510 High Density Residential CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 1-51 821 E OAK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13922511 High Density Residential CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 1-52 815 E OAK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13922512 High Density Residential CD(CORE) 20 136 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 1-53 442 N SUTTER ST 404
STOCKTON CA 95202 13923001 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.21 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 1-54 537 E LINDSAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13923018 Commercial CG(CORE) 20 136 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 1-55 519 E LINDSAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13923021 Commercial CG(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 1-56 437 E MINER AV
STOCKTON CA 95202 13924017 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.35 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 21 21 Yes No No Yes 1-57 206 N SUTTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13925003 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.46 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 27 27 Yes No No Yes 1-58 532 E MINER AV
STOCKTON CA 95202 13925008 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.14 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 8 8 Yes No No Yes 1-59 544 E MINER AV
STOCKTON CA 95202 13925027 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 13 13 Yes No No Yes 1-60 621 E WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95202 13927014 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.8 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 48 48 Yes No No Yes 1-61 814 CHANNEL ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13928012 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 1-63 925 E MINER AV
STOCKTON CA 95202 15111005 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 1-64 128 N AURORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 15115014 Commercial CD(CORE) 20 136 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 2-1
1816 RIVER DR
STOCKTON CA 95204 11131024 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.53 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 No No Yes Yes 2-2
1819 PRINCETON AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 11134006 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.65 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 No No Yes Yes 2-3
1747 PRINCETON AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 11134012 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 No No Yes Yes 2-4
2000 MARSHALL AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 11709014 Institutional RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 6.75 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 162 162 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1307
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-5
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
2-5
2446 COUNTRY CLUB
BL STOCKTON CA
95204
12304005 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.28 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 No No Yes Yes 2-6
2442 COUNTRY CLUB
BL STOCKTON CA
95204
12304010 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.57 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 No No Yes Yes 2-7
2433 CANAL DR
STOCKTON CA 95204 12304049 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.83 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 5 5 No No Yes Yes 2-8
2204 CANAL DR
STOCKTON CA 95204 12330043 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.32 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 No No Yes Yes 2-9
2838 N CALIFORNIA
ST STOCKTON CA
95204
12536021 Administrative
Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.39 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 18 18 Yes No No Yes 2-10 453 HAMPTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12537015 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.16 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 2-11 557 E PINE ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12538008 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-12 539 E PINE ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12538010 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.15 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 2-13 437 E PINE ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12538018 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-14 20 W WYANDOTTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12703036 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-15 1502 N EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12708018 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.32 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 2-16 406 CHESTNUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12714018 Medium Density Residential CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.14 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-17
2121 N CALIFORNIA
ST STOCKTON CA
95204
12716212 Administrative
Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-18
2031 N CALIFORNIA
ST STOCKTON CA
95204
12717121 Administrative
Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-19 420 CHESTNUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12718022 Medium Density Residential CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-20 417 E WALNUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12718029 Medium Density Residential CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-21 415 E WALNUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12718030 Medium Density Residential CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-22 411 E WALNUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12718031 Medium Density Residential CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-23 409 E WALNUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95204 12718032 Medium Density Residential CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.14 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-24 1811 MARSHALL AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 12728034 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 3.39 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 23 23 Yes No No Yes 2-25 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 13319038 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.2 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 2-26
2177 MONTE DIABLO
AV STOCKTON CA
95203
13323068 Medium Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.15 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 2-27 1852 SHIMIZU DR
STOCKTON CA 95203 13346006 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 2-28 1002 N YOSEMITE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13539314 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 2-29 340 W HARDING WY
STOCKTON CA 95204 13708001 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.32 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 2-30 320 W HARDING WY
STOCKTON CA 95204 13708002 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.18 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 2-31 133 W MAGNOLIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13712211 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.1 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 2-32 17 W MAGNOLIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13712410 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 2-33 747 N CENTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13718028 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 2-34 39 W PARK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13718032 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.12 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1308
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-6 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
2-35 107 W PARK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13718040 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 2-36 231 E ROSE ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13903023 Low Density Residential CO(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 2-37 741 N HUNTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13905403 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 9 9 Yes No No Yes 2-38 748 N HUNTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13905601 Commercial CO(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 2-39 719 N CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13917407 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 2-40 701 N CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13917408 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 2-41 435 E PARK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13917409 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 2-42 425 E PARK ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13917410 Commercial CO(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 2-43 1028 N SUTTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95202 13918032 Low Density Residential CO(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 3-1
821 PLEASANT AV &&
STOCKTON CA 95205 14104017 Yes, 3-1 through 3-3 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
3-2
821 PLEASANT AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 14104018 Yes, 3-1 through 3-3 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.28 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
3-3
740 N WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 14107022 Yes, 3-1 through 3-3 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 6 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 80 80 Units not counted towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
3-4
1220 E MINER AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15116026 Yes, 3-4 and 3-5 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-5
220 N PILGRIM ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15116059 Yes, 3-4 and 3-5 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.3 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 3-6 14308061 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 3.5 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 46 46 Yes No No No 3-7
1240 KLINGER RD
STOCKTON CA 95205 11710006 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-8
2225 WEST LN
STOCKTON CA 95205 11710007 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.14 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-9
1920 N WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 11714024 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-10 1926 N WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 11714026 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-11 1934 N WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 11714028 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-12 1064 WATERLOO RD
STOCKTON CA 95205 14105039 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-13 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 14109035 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.21 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-14 2653 E FREMONT ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 14308028 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.36 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No No 3-15 704 N FILBERT ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 14308036 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 1.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 18 18 Yes No No No 3-16 738 N FILBERT ST F
STOCKTON CA 95205 14308037 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 2.54 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 35 35 Yes No No No 3-17
829 N GOLDEN GATE
AV STOCKTON CA
95205
14346016 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No No 3-18 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 15108036 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.4 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 16 16 Yes No No Yes 3-19 647 N UNION ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15108037 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.64 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 25 25 Yes No No Yes 3-20 640 N UNION ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15108049 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.47 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 18 18 Yes No No Yes 3-21 1121 E OAK ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15108054 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-22 1221 E OAK ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15109111 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 3-23 1025 E LINDSAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15112002 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Yes No No Yes 3-24 1004 E LINDSAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15112050 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 1.03 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 41 41 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1309
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-7
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
3-25 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 15112054 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Yes No No Yes 3-26 425 N UNION ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15112062 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.7 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 28 28 Yes No No Yes 3-27 336 N AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 15113031 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 3-28 1139 CHANNEL ST B
STOCKTON CA 95205 15116015 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-29 1435 E WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15117033 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 3-30 1328 CHANNEL ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15117040 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-31
139 N SIERRA NEVADA
ST STOCKTON CA
95205
15117043 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-32 1339 E WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15117045 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.1 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-33 1327 E WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15117046 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 3-34 1102 E WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15120301 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 13 13 Yes No No Yes 3-35 1135 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15120308 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-36 1140 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15120406 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-37 1226 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15120603 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-38 20 S PILGRIM ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15120615 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 3-39 1424 E WEBER AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15121016 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-40
34 S SIERRA NEVADA
ST STOCKTON CA
95205
15121036 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 3-41 1348 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15121042 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-42 1405 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15121061 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.36 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 14 14 Yes No No Yes 3-43 1120 E MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15124005 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 3-44 1134 E MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15124008 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.19 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 13 13 Yes No No Yes 3-45 1346 E MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15125106 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.12 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes No No Yes 3-46
129 S SIERRA NEVADA
ST STOCKTON CA
95205
15125108 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 3-47 1604 E LINDSAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15302027 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.16 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-48 1602 E LINDSAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15302036 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.18 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-49 36 N WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 15304018 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.71 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 9 9 Yes No No Yes 3-50 1649 CHANNEL ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15306005 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.12 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-51 1902 E MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15309060 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-52 1914 MYRTLE ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15309061 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-53 1918 MYRTLE ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15309062 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-54 2169 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15310504 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-55 2269 FINLAND AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15315040 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-56 2202 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15320201 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1310
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-8 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
3-57 2371 MARSH ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15320616 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.2 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No No 3-58 2498 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15321013 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No No 3-59 1710 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15502020 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-60 1718 E MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15522003 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.14 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-61 1736 E MARKET ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15522005 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-62 111 S LOCUST ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15522007 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-63 156 DELLA ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15522055 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 3-64 120 S LOCUST ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15522061 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.25 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes No No Yes 3-65 2136 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15524005 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.1 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-66 2144 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15524030 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.1 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-67 2274 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15535008 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 3-68 809 SHARON AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15538029 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No No 3-69 2414 E WORTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15539023 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No No 3-70 2426 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15541007 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 3-71 2428 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15541008 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 3-72 2409 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15542001 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.48 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No No 3-73 2531 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15543022 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.1 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 3-74 2849 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15703013 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.4 0.8 Vacant Yes - City Owned 1 1 2 Yes No No No 3-75 639 DAVID AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15709030 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.22 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No No 3-76 2935 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15709031 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No No 3-77 2919 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15709032 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.19 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No No 3-78 2915 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15709033 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.15 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No No 3-79 3002 E MAIN ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15710318 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.64 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes No No No 3-80 15710319 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 3-81 1037 NETHERTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15711019 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.21 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 3-82 1114 SULLIVAN AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15713002 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.38 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No No 3-83 1106 BURKETT AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15713005 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 1.38 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No No 3-84 935 S BROADWAY AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15716006 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 3-85 716 S WINDSOR AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15717038 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 4-1
550 W SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703001 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 9 9 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-2
524 W SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703002 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-3
407 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA
952033311
14703003 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Units not counted
towards the RHNA. Yes No No Yes
4-4
413 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703004 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1311
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-9
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
4-5
427 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703005 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-6
443 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703006 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-7
511 W CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703007 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-8
521 W CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703008 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-9
525 W CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703009 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-10 533 W CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703010 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-11 446 S HARRISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703011 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-12 428 S HARRISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703012 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-13 424 S HARRISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703013 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-14 420 S HARRISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703014 Yes, 4-1 through 4-14 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-15 30 W LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731006 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.37 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 14 14 Yes No No Yes 4-16 28 W LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731007 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.03 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-17 22 W LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731008 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.05 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-18 2 W LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731009 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-19 317 S CENTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731010 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.14 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-20 325 S CENTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731011 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-21 339 S CENTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731012 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No Yes 4-22 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731013 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No Yes 4-23 40 W SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731014 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.06 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-24 31 W SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731015 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.06 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-25 43 W SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731016 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-26 47 W SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13731017 Yes, 4-15 through 4-26 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-27 2211 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16908049 Yes, 4-27 through 4-30 Administrative Professional CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-28 2211 S AIRPORT WY &
STOCKTON CA 95206 16908050 Yes, 4-27 through 4-30 Administrative Professional CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-29 2347 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16909051 Yes, 4-27 through 4-30 Administrative Professional CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.48 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-30 2361 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16909052 Yes, 4-27 through 4-30 Administrative Professional CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Units not counted
towards the RHNA.
Yes No No Yes
4-33
411 S STANISLAUS ST
& STOCKTON CA
95203
14926120 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 1.66 0.8 Vacant Yes - City Owned 5th 17 102 119 Yes No No Yes
4-34 14729412 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.69 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 27 27 Yes No No Yes 4-35 507 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703017 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.98 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 39 39 Yes No No Yes 4-36 510 W CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703018 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-37 547 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14703020 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-38 819 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14705004 Industrial RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1312
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-10 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
4-39 821 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14705005 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-40 822 S HARRISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14705011 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-41 645 W ANDERSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14705077 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-42 1321 S VAN BUREN ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14707605 Low Density Residential CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Yes No No Yes 4-43 201 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 14708604 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.15 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-44 1201 S CENTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14716003 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.31 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 4-45 1203 S CENTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14716004 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.57 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 22 22 Yes No No Yes 4-46 1220 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14716023 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-47 44 E CLAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14716028 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No Yes 4-48 44 W CLAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14716032 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-49 1113 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14719007 Commercial CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-50 35 E JACKSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14719010 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 4-51 223 E JEFFERSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14720112 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-52
1140 S SAN JOAQUIN
ST STOCKTON CA
95206
14720313 Low Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-53
915 S SAN JOAQUIN
ST STOCKTON CA
95206
14721208 Low Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.16 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-54 820 S SUTTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14721510 Commercial RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-55 804 S SUTTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14721511 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.52 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 20 20 Yes No No Yes 4-56
702 S SAN JOAQUIN
ST STOCKTON CA
95203
14722008 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.26 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 10 10 Yes No No Yes 4-57 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 14722011 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.35 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 14 14 Yes No No Yes 4-58 713 S CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14723002 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.78 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 31 31 Yes No No Yes 4-59 440 E WORTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14724005 Low Density Residential CN(GREATER) 20 90 0.21 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 8 8 Yes No No Yes 4-60
918 S CALIFORNIA ST
B STOCKTON CA
95206
14724037 Low Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes No No Yes 4-61 1120 S AMERICAN ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14727033 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-62 1219 S STANISLAUS ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14727040 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-63 627 E WORTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14729207 Commercial RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-64 817 S GRANT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14729402 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Yes No No Yes 4-65 825 S GRANT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14729403 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Yes No No Yes 4-66 707 E WORTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14729409 Commercial RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-67 747 S GRANT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14730005 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.46 0.4464 Vacant Yes - City Owned 18 18 Yes No Yes Yes 4-68 720 S STANISLAUS ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14730006 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.92 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 36 36 Yes No Yes Yes 4-69 635 S AURORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14730007 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 2 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 80 80 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1313
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-11
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
4-70 904 S GRANT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14731003 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-71 820 E WORTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14731005 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 3 3 Yes No No Yes 4-72 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 14731008 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-73 926 S GRANT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14731017 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-74 929 S AURORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14731019 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.41 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-75 1306 S AMERICAN ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14734101 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 4-76 810 E JACKSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 14734402 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-77 111 E SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14906311 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-78 348 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14906312 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-79 134 E SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14906405 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-80 121 E CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14906412 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-81 430 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14906413 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.38 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 15 15 Yes No No Yes 4-82
329 S SAN JOAQUIN
ST STOCKTON CA
95203
14906507 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-83 231 E SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14906510 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-84 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 14907041 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.68 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 27 27 Yes No No Yes 4-85 319 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14908114 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-86 302 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14908202 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.52 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 20 20 Yes No Yes Yes 4-87 539 S CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14908308 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 4-88 547 S CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14908310 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 18 18 Yes No No Yes 4-89 518 S SUTTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14908316 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 4-90 432 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14908408 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.18 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No Yes 4-91 701 S CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14908409 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.18 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No Yes Yes 4-92 421 S SUTTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909206 Commercial RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 4-93 412 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909302 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-94 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909303 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-95 320 S SUTTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909313 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-96 528 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909502 Yes, 4-96, 4-97, 4-230 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant Yes - City Owned 4th and 5th 1 3 4 Yes No No Yes 4-97 317 S AMERICAN ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909504 Yes, 4-96, 4-97, 4-230 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.14 0.4464 Vacant Yes - City Owned 4th and 5th 1 4 5 Yes No No Yes 4-98 310 S CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909516 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-99 712 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14926302 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 4-100 315 S GRANT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14926308 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 4-101 745 E SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14926309 High Density Residential RH(GREATER) 20 90 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 20 20 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1314
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-12 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
4-102 635 S AURORA ST A
STOCKTON CA 95203 14927055 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 1.38 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 55 55 Yes No No Yes 4-103 760 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14927059 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 1.07 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 42 42 Yes No Yes Yes 4-104 816 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14927061 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.62 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 24 24 Yes No No Yes 4-105 822 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14927062 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-106 826 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14927063 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-107 830 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14927064 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-109 342 S UNION ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15126014 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-110 326 S UNION ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15126015 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-111 1120 E SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15126020 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-112 1119 E CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15126030 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-113 1107 E CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15126031 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 3 3 Yes No No Yes 4-114 1125 E SONORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15126042 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 4-115
619 S SIERRA NEVADA
ST STOCKTON CA
95205
15129407 Low Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-116 1429 E HAZELTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15129507 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-117 615 S WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 15129607 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.15 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-118 1321 E WORTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15131024 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-119 1423 E WORTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15131059 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-120
927 S SIERRA NEVADA
ST STOCKTON CA
95205
15133309 Medium Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.15 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-121 1001 S WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 15133409 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 9 9 Yes No No Yes 4-122
924 S SIERRA NEVADA
ST STOCKTON CA
95205
15133516 Medium Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-123 1145 E JACKSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134007 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.16 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-124 1112 E JACKSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134012 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-125 1203 S PILGRIM ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134013 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.36 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-126 1215 S PILGRIM ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134014 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-127 1149 E CLAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134016 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-128 1133 E CLAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134018 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-129 1121 E CLAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134019 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-130 1218 S UNION ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15134021 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 4-131 1202 S PILGRIM ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15135009 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-132 1218 S PILGRIM ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15135010 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-133 1242 E JACKSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15135013 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-134 1215 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 15135015 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1315
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-13
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
4-135 1227 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95205 15135016 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.11 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-136 1337 S PILGRIM ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15136012 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-137 1140 E CLAY ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15136013 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-138
1313 E DR MARTIN
LUTHER KING JR BL
STOCKTON CA 95205
15137007 Commercial CG(GREATER) 20 90 0.43 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 17 17 Yes No No Yes 4-139 1517 E SCOTTS AV
STOCKTON CA 95205 15506010 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-140 731 DELLA ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15507011 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-141 1857 E JEFFERSON ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15513023 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-142 319 S LOCUST ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15519022 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.15 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-143 1819 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95205 15522058 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.2 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-144
1909 E LAFAYETTE ST
&& STOCKTON CA
95205
15523026 Medium Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-145 226 S A ST STOCKTON
CA 95205 15523033 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.57 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 4-147 3109 GASWELL LN
STOCKTON CA 95206 16412027 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes Yes No Yes 4-148 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16504001 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.23 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes No No Yes 4-149 1725 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 16504021 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.09 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 14 14 Yes No No Yes 4-150 1987 S MADISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16508062 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-151 562 W SEVENTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16517049 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-152 2321 S MADISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16520214 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.24 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-153 15 W NINTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16522001 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.65 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes No No Yes 4-154 2363 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16522002 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-155 2454 S HARRISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16526229 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-156 2470 S HARRISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16526230 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-157 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16528031 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.83 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-158 2935 S LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16528039 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 3.07 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 21 21 Yes No No Yes 4-159 3076 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 16528053 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.35 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 31 31 Yes No No Yes 4-160 2557 S MADISON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16535045 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-161 2558 S MONROE ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16535046 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-162 2220 S COMMERCE ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16536026 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-163 2253 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16536031 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.43 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-164 1445 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16702106 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-165 1451 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16702107 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-166 1455 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16702108 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-167 1434 S CENTER ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16702112 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1316
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-14 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
4-168 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16702113 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-169 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16702114 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-170 1521 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16702204 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-171 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16705018 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.27 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-172 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16705019 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.28 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-173 2154 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16705021 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.92 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 25 25 Yes No No Yes 4-174 2420 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16707001 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.44 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 4-175 627 E SIXTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16711612 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.35 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-176 1425 S CALIFORNIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16715030 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-177 1702 S AURORA ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16719508 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.34 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-178 644 WILLIAM MOSS BL
STOCKTON CA 95206 16817001 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 3.59 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 86 86 Yes Yes No Yes 4-179 600 WILLIAM MOSS BL
STOCKTON CA 95206 16817002 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.04 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 48 48 Yes Yes No Yes 4-180 1121 FOLSOM ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16904008 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.54 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 4-181 1795 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16905002 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.75 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 23 23 Yes No No Yes 4-182 2051 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16907701 Administrative Professional CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.48 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 4-183 2135 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16907703 Administrative Professional CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.33 0.4464 Vacant Yes - City Owned 1 3 4 Yes No No Yes 4-184 2427 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16910030 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.04 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 Yes No No Yes 4-185
2427 S AIRPORT WY
&& STOCKTON CA
95206
16910042 Administrative
Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.18 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-186 2482 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16913325 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.48 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 19 19 Yes No No Yes 4-187 1402 TWELFTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16913524 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.76 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 4-188 2348 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16915210 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.59 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 4-189 1651 E SIXTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16919012 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-190 1661 E SIXTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16919014 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.21 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 5 5 Yes No No Yes 4-191 1707 E MARIPOSA RD
STOCKTON CA 95205 17110007 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 8.56 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 114 114 Yes No No Yes 4-192 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 17110014 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 3.92 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 52 52 Yes No No Yes 4-193 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 17110015 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 8.26 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 110 110 Yes No No Yes 4-194 1665 E MARIPOSA RD
STOCKTON CA 95205 17110018 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.77 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No No 4-195 1667 E MARIPOSA RD
STOCKTON CA 95205 17110019 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.88 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 11 11 Yes No No No 4-196 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 17110022 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No No 4-197 1903 POCK LN
STOCKTON CA 95205 17111006 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No No 4-198 2187 POCK LN
STOCKTON CA 95205 17111014 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 1.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No Yes 4-199 2432 POCK LN
STOCKTON CA 95205 17125029 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 6.32 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 87 87 Yes No No Yes 4-200 2432 POCK LN &&
STOCKTON CA 95205 17125032 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 1.6 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 22 22 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1317
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-15
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
4-201 2085 E MARIPOSA RD
STOCKTON CA 95205 17129004 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.54 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 Yes No No No 4-202
3319 FARMINGTON
RD STOCKTON CA
95205
17304025 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 1.76 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 12 12 Yes No No No 4-203
3411 FARMINGTON
RD STOCKTON CA
95205
17304049 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.63 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No No 4-204 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 17305028 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No No 4-205 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 17305044 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.81 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 Yes No No No 4-206 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 17305045 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.54 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No No 4-207 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 17305046 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.54 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes No No No 4-208 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95205 17305047 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.27 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 4-209 2702 HARRIS AV
STOCKTON CA 95206 17507006 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-210 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 17507008 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 2.73 0.8 Vacant Yes - City Owned 19 19 Yes No No Yes 4-211 3355 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17508005 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.96 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 12 12 No No Yes Yes 4-212 473 DOWNING AV
STOCKTON CA 95206 17508008 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.41 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 No No Yes Yes 4-213 3331 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17508012 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.47 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 No No Yes Yes 4-214 3306 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17508017 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 6.51 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 87 87 No No Yes Yes 4-215 3338 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17508018 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 No No Yes Yes 4-216 3350 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17508019 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 13 13 No No Yes Yes 4-217 3364 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17508020 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 13 13 No No Yes Yes 4-218 3530 MARY AV
STOCKTON CA 95206 17513023 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-219 3417 S EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 17513045 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 1.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 9 9 Yes No No Yes 4-220 193 CLAYTON AV
STOCKTON CA 95206 17514007 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.66 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 4-221 3677 MARY AV
STOCKTON CA 95206 17514008 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 4-222 234 WAIT AV
STOCKTON CA 95206 17514053 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-223 3649 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17518012 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 1.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 No No Yes Yes 4-224 3685 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17520002 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 2.71 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 18 18 No No Yes Yes 4-225 3707 TURNPIKE RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 17520003 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 2.9 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 20 20 No No Yes Yes 4-226 3028 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 17716534 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-227 3076 S AIRPORT WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 17716552 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 4-228 3535 S B ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 17721008 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 5.52 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 76 76 Yes No No Yes 4-229 3201 GLENHAVEN LN
STOCKTON CA 95206 17954011 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 No No No No 4-230 534 E LAFAYETTE ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14909503 Yes, 4-96, 4-97, 4-230 Commercial CD(GREATER) 20 90 0.09 0.4464 Vacant Yes - City Owned 4th and 5th 1 2 3 Yes No No Yes 4-231 16902002 Yes, 4-231 and 4-232 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.34 0.4464 Vacant Yes - City Owned 1 3 4 Yes No No Yes
4-232 1120 FOLSOM ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16904009 Yes, 4-231 and 4-232 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.18 0.4464 Vacant Yes - City Owned 2 2 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1318
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-16 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
5-1
12 S LOS ANGELES AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14505037 Commercial CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.5 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 5-2
522 MODESTO AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14517023 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.2 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 5-3
409 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14524039 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 1 1 Yes No No Yes 5-4
445 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14524041 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 5-5
825 W CHURCH ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14524049 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 5-6
325 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14525020 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.27 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes No No Yes 5-7
602 GARFIELD ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14531021 Low Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.47 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 5-8
505 GARFIELD ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14531030 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 5-9
519 GARFIELD ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14531031 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 5-10 547 GARFIELD ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 14531033 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 5-11 454 S PERSHING AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14531037 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 5-12 512 S PERSHING AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14531038 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 5-13 538 S PERSHING AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14531041 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.19 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 6-1
1255 DORAY CT
STOCKTON CA 95203 13302047 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.14 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 No No No Yes 6-2
2732 SHIMIZU DR
STOCKTON CA 95203 13307006 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 4.67 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 65 65 No No Yes Yes 6-3
2612 MONTE DIABLO
AV STOCKTON CA
95203
13311105 Medium Density
Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 No No Yes Yes 6-4
2627 W ACACIA ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13311126 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.17 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 2 2 No No Yes Yes 6-5
906 RYDE AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 13311128 Commercial CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 No No Yes Yes 6-6
2519 W FREMONT ST
STOCKTON CA 95203 13311208 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 No No Yes Yes 6-10 112 FRESNO AV
STOCKTON CA 95203 14530002 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.15 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 7-1
3322 RAINIER AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 10906033 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 3.15 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 21 21 No No Yes Yes 7-2
3344 WENDELL AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 10906034 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 1.05 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 7 7 No No Yes Yes 7-3
3434 RUMSON AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 10910001 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 No No Yes Yes 7-4
3566 RAINIER AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 10911018 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 8.12 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 56 56 No No Yes Yes 7-5
3430 DEER PARK DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 11627010 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 29 29 Yes No No Yes 7-6
3127 W MARCH LN
STOCKTON CA 95219 11627013 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.54 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 20 20 Yes No No Yes 7-7
6079 RIVERBANK CI
STOCKTON CA 95219 11654034 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 7-8
6101 RIVERBANK CI
STOCKTON CA 95219 11654057 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 7-9
4714 ST ANDREWS DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 11825017 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.34 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 7-10 4347 ST ANDREWS DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 11827019 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 7-11 4860 ST ANDREWS DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 11839001 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.28 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 7-12 4812 ST ANDREWS DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 11840009 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 7-13 5501 ST ANDREWS DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 11842007 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1319
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-17
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
7-14 2644 WARREN AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 12117023 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 No No Yes Yes 7-15 2142 FONTANA AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 12118030 Institutional RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.49 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 59 59 No No Yes Yes 7-16 2622 DELANO AV
STOCKTON CA 95204 12132018 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.19 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 No No Yes Yes 8-1
1787 W LINCOLN RD
STOCKTON CA 95207 7723040 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 8-2
1132 WILLORA RD
STOCKTON CA 95207 7736041 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 8-3
7216 CARAN AV
STOCKTON CA 95207 7736043 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 8-4
1084 RIVARA RD
STOCKTON CA 95207 7738002 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.42 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 8-5
7808 CARAN AV
STOCKTON CA 95207 7749034 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.63 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes No No Yes 8-6
232 W PEARL AV
STOCKTON CA 95207 8137504 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 8-7
156 E LINCOLN RD
STOCKTON CA 95207 8153014 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 2.04 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 14 14 Yes No No Yes 8-8
6131 N PERSHING AV
STOCKTON CA 95207 9729040 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.43 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 8-9
4830 KENTFIELD RD
STOCKTON CA 95207 10411017 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.15 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 8-10
1545 W LONGVIEW AV
&& STOCKTON CA
95207
10810040 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.27 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 8-11 740 W SWAIN RD
STOCKTON CA 95207 10812023 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.28 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 8-12 4425 N PERSHING AV
STOCKTON CA 95207 11018007 Commercial CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.45 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 8-13 940 ROSE MARIE LN
STOCKTON CA 95207 11022006 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 8.93 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 119 119 Yes No No Yes 8-14 4444 N PERSHING AV
STOCKTON CA 95207 11022017 Administrative Professional RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.44 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 8-15 881 W BIANCHI RD
STOCKTON CA 95207 11024001 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.38 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 5 5 Yes No No No 8-16 732 ROSE MARIE LN
STOCKTON CA 95207 11024007 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.26 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No No 8-17 752 PODESTO LN
STOCKTON CA 95207 11025009 Commercial CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.22 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No No 8-18 4239 PACIFIC AV
STOCKTON CA 95207 11025014 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.49 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 6 6 Yes No No No 9-1
4424 IJAMS RD
STOCKTON CA 95210 9605012 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 1.34 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No No 9-2
1808 E MARCH LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 9614016 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.61 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes No No Yes 9-3
1756 E MARCH LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 9614055 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 3.51 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 47 47 Yes No No Yes 9-4
5044 WEST LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 9614068 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.11 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 28 28 Yes No No Yes 9-5
4512 HELENS OAKS CI
STOCKTON CA 95210 9632038 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.12 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No No 9-6
1080 E MARCH LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 10416008 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.89 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 25 25 Yes No No Yes 9-7
1050 E MARCH LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 10416036 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 3.24 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 43 43 Yes No No Yes 9-8
1051 CLOWES CT
STOCKTON CA 95210 10416040 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.2 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 29 29 Yes No No Yes 9-9
1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95210 10416041 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.35 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes No No Yes 9-10 2871 AUTO CENTER CI
STOCKTON CA 95212 12803001 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 2.65 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 36 36 Yes No No Yes 9-11 2868 AUTO CENTER CI
STOCKTON CA 95212 12803003 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 8.32 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 115 115 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1320
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-18 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
9-12 13004011 High Density
Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 23.96 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 455 455 Units calculated for
18.96 acres. The 5
acres omitted are for
the anticipated
extension of March
Lane east from Holman
Road to connect with
SR99.
Yes No Yes Yes
9-13 2733 AUTO CENTER CI
STOCKTON CA 95212 12803004 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 5.13 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5th 71 71 Yes No No Yes 11-1
5133 S STATE ROUTE
99 E FR RD STOCKTON
CA 95215
17919003 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.62 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 No No Yes No 11-2
3411 IMPERIAL WY
STOCKTON CA 95215 17926001 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 3.26 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 43 43 No No Yes No 11-3
3445 IMPERIAL WY
STOCKTON CA 95215 17926002 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 4.8 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 64 64 No No Yes No 11-4
4739 S STATE ROUTE
99 E FR RD STOCKTON
CA 95215
17926036 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.37 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 No No No No 11-5
3449 METRO DR
STOCKTON CA 95215 17926056 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 4.83 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 64 64 No No Yes No 11-6
4965 S STATE ROUTE
99 E FR RD STOCKTON
CA 95205
17931007 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.61 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 No No No No 11-7
3486 METRO DR
STOCKTON CA 95215 17948004 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.4 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 32 32 No No Yes No 11-8
4850 S STATE ROUTE
99 E FR RD STOCKTON
CA 95215
17948005 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.02 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 13 13 No No Yes No 11-9
4884 S STATE ROUTE
99 E FR RD STOCKTON
CA 95215
17948006 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.82 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 37 37 No No Yes No 11-10 3651 ARCH RD
STOCKTON CA 95215 17948007 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.79 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 23 23 No No Yes No 11-11 3536 METRO DR
STOCKTON CA 95215 17948009 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.79 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 23 23 No No Yes No 11-12 3518 METRO DR
STOCKTON CA 95215 17948010 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 13 13 No No Yes No 11-13 3498 METRO DR
STOCKTON CA 95215 17948011 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.17 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 15 15 No No Yes No 11-14
5783 S FRENCH CAMP
RD STOCKTON CA
95206
19302038 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 2.32 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 31 31 Yes No No Yes 12-1
2280 W CHARTER WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16302042 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 1.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes Yes No Yes 12-2
2440 W CHARTER WY
STOCKTON CA 95206 16302043 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 13.58 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 94 94 Yes Yes No Yes 12-3
2313 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 16313009 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 2.44 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 16 16 Yes Yes No Yes 12-4
2005 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314007 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 2.36 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 16 16 Yes Yes No Yes 12-5
821 W EIGHTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314012 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 8.76 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 117 117 Yes Yes No Yes 12-6
741 W EIGHTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314013 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 4.76 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 63 63 Yes Yes No Yes 12-7
715 W EIGHTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314014 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 3.74 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 50 50 Yes Yes No Yes 12-8
707 W EIGHTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314029 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.67 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes Yes No Yes 12-9
803 W EIGHTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314034 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.38 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 5 5 Yes Yes No Yes 12-10 815 W EIGHTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314035 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.46 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes Yes No Yes 12-11 719 W EIGHTH ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16314044 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.33 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes Yes No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1321
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-19
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
12-12 1830 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16317003 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.9 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes Yes No Yes 12-13 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16317004 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.61 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 4 4 Yes Yes No Yes 12-14 1802 S ARGONAUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16319001 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.48 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes Yes No Yes 12-15 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16319035 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.61 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4 4 Yes Yes No Yes 12-16 1815 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16319037 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes Yes No Yes 12-17 1865 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16319039 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 3.6 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 25 25 Yes Yes No Yes 12-18 846 W SECOND ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16321011 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.56 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes Yes No Yes 12-19 1658 S ARGONAUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16322007 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.54 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes Yes No Yes 12-20 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 16322018 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes Yes No Yes 12-21
1749 S STOCKTON ST
&& STOCKTON CA
95206
16322024 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.5 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes Yes No Yes 12-22 1729 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16322025 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.28 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes Yes No Yes 12-23 1651 S STOCKTON ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16322031 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.94 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes Yes No Yes 12-24 1638 S ARGONAUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16322044 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes Yes No Yes 12-25 1648 S ARGONAUT ST
STOCKTON CA 95206 16322046 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.95 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes Yes No Yes 12-26
2107 WATERCOURSE
ST STOCKTON CA
95206
16408001 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.35 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes Yes No Yes 12-28 752 CLOYNE CT
STOCKTON CA 95206 16723008 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 12-29 729 CLOYNE CT
STOCKTON CA 95206 16723011 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 12-30 3904 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 19304028 Administrative Professional CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 8.62 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 115 115 No No Yes Yes 12-31 4236 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 19304033 Administrative Professional CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 12.81 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 171 171 Yes No Yes Yes 12-32 4586 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 19304034 Administrative Professional CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.69 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 9 9 Yes No No Yes 12-33 1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95206 19304035 Administrative Professional CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.12 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 12-34 4245 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 16817007 High Density Residential See notes 17.5 30 50.02 See notes Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 626 626 In 2023, the City
approved a Tentative
Parcel Map to split this
into 4 parcels and
rezone portions to
become: (1) 7.12 ac.,
CG zone, (2) 10.00 ac.,
RH zone, (3) 12.16 ac.,
RH zone and (4) 20.74
ac., RL zone. Only the
CG and RH portions
are used for unit yield,
with realistic capacity
modifiers of 44.6% for
CG and 80% for RH.
Yes Yes No Yes
12-35 530 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 16819007 Commercial CL(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 19.35 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 259 259 Yes Yes No Yes 12-36
567 W FRENCH CAMP
RD STOCKTON CA
95206
16819015 Commercial CL(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 12.9 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 172 172 Yes Yes No Yes 12-37
454 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206
16819008 Commercial CL(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 4.96 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned
4th and 5th 66 66 Yes Yes No Yes
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1322
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-20 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
12-38 4601 MANTHEY RD
STOCKTON CA 95206 16819009 Commercial CL(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.16 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 15 15 Yes Yes No Yes 13-1
5324 PASADENA DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 6607017 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.87 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 13-2
5358 PASADENA DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 6607019 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.42 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 13-3
5701 MIRAMONTE WY
STOCKTON CA 95219 6615001 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.27 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 13-4
5711 MIRAMONTE WY
STOCKTON CA 95219 6615002 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 13-5
5713 MIRAMONTE WY
STOCKTON CA 95219 6615003 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.29 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 13-6
8090 MARINERS DR
STOCKTON CA 95219 7118017 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.64 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 8 8 Yes No No Yes 15-1
10585 DAVIS RD
STOCKTON CA 95209 7007011 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.77 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 5 5 Yes No No Yes 15-2
10906 DAVIS RD
STOCKTON CA 95209 7009001 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.97 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 26 26 Yes No Yes Yes 15-3
1106 WHISTLER WY
STOCKTON CA 95209 7059069 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.55 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 15-4
10822 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061005 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-5
10826 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061006 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.24 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-6
10830 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061007 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.24 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-7
10834 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061008 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-8
10838 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061009 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-9
10842 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061010 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-10 10846 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061011 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-11 10850 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061012 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-12 10854 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061013 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.48 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 15-13 10858 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061014 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-14 10862 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061015 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.24 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-15 10805 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7061027 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.24 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-16 10866 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7062001 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.21 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-17 10874 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7062003 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-18 10882 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7062005 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-19 10886 ST MORITZ CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7062006 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.21 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-20 1330 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064004 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.27 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-21 1222 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064020 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-22 1216 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064021 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.22 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-23 1211 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064024 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.19 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-24 1277 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064029 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.24 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-25 1289 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064030 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-26 1313 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064031 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.24 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1323
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-21
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
15-27 1345 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064033 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.23 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-28 1351 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064034 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-29 1205 HEAVENLY CI
STOCKTON CA 95209 7064035 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-30
10652 OCEAN MIST
WY STOCKTON CA
95209
7074001 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-31
10640 OCEAN MIST
WY STOCKTON CA
95209
7074002 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.32 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-32
2809 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074003 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.37 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-33
2801 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074004 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.37 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-34
2741 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074005 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.37 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-35
2729 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074006 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.35 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-36
2717 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074007 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.36 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-37
2705 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074008 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.48 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 3 3 Yes No No Yes 15-38 10636 GREY HAWK CT
STOCKTON CA 95209 7074009 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.34 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-39 10630 GREY HAWK CT
STOCKTON CA 95209 7074010 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-40 10618 GREY HAWK CT
STOCKTON CA 95209 7074012 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-41 10612 GREY HAWK CT
STOCKTON CA 95209 7074013 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-42 10606 GREY HAWK CT
STOCKTON CA 95209 7074014 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.37 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-43 10605 GREY HAWK CT
STOCKTON CA 95209 7074015 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.26 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-44 10611 GREY HAWK CT
STOCKTON CA 95209 7074016 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 0.37 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-45
2714 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074018 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.36 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-46
2726 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074019 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.42 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-47
2738 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074020 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-48
2802 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074021 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-49
2810 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074022 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-50
2824 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074024 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-51
2912 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074025 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1324
Notes: Prescribed densities within the CD, CG, CL, CN, CO and RH zones depends on whether a site is located in the downtown core, the greater downtown or outside of the downtown. For sites in these zones, the entries in the zoning column in the table include “Core” “Greater” or “Outside” to indicate the site’s location.
Those sites that have been previously identified in two or more consecutive planning periods and do not currently allow residential development by right are denoted in bold and italics.
A-22 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
SITE
#
ADDRESS APN CONSOLIDATED SITES GENERAL
PLAN ZONING MIN. DENSITY
MAX.
DENSITY
PARCEL
ACREAGE
REALISTIC
CAPACITY
MODIFIER
SITE
STATUS
PUBLICLYOWNED
IDENTIFIED
IN PRIOR
PLANNING
CYCLE(S)
LOWER
INCOME
CAPACITY
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
ABOVE
MODERATE
INCOME
CAPACITY
TOTAL
CAPACITY NOTES
FEMA
500YR
FLOOD
USACE
200YR
FLOOD
FEMA
100YR
FLOOD
DAM
INUNDATION
15-52
2920 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074026 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-53
2928 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074027 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.33 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-54
2936 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074028 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.28 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 1 1 Yes No No Yes 15-55
2944 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074029 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.36 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-56
2947 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074030 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.4 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-57
2939 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074031 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.3 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-58
2931 GOLDEN EAGLE
DR STOCKTON CA
95209
7074032 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.35 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-59
10637 OCEAN MIST
WY STOCKTON CA
95209
7074033 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.32 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-60
10651 OCEAN MIST
WY STOCKTON CA
95209
7074034 Low Density
Residential RL 0 8.7 0.31 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 2 2 Yes No No Yes 15-61 9473 WEST LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 8406010 Low Density Residential RL 0 8.7 13.57 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 94 94 Yes No No Yes 16-1
7620 WEST LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 9404007 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.55 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 7 7 Yes No No Yes 16-2
8032 DON AV
STOCKTON CA 95209 7542006 High Density Residential RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.28 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 6 6 Yes No No Yes 16-3
2143 WAGNER
HEIGHTS RD
STOCKTON CA 95209
8027008 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.45 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 6 6 Yes No No Yes 16-4
8955 THORNTON RD
STOCKTON CA 95209 8030014 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.34 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 17 17 Yes No Yes Yes 16-5
9009 THORNTON RD
STOCKTON CA 95209 8030015 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.95 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 12 12 Yes No No Yes 16-6
8601 THORNTON RD
STOCKTON CA 95209 8032006 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 3.54 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 49 49 Yes No No Yes 16-7
1 *UNASSIGNED
STOCKTON CA 95209 8032007 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 3.09 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 43 43 Yes No No Yes 16-8
9051 KELLEY DR
STOCKTON CA 95209 8202026 Medium Density Residential RM 8.8 17.4 0.25 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 3 3 Yes No No Yes 16-9
1530 E MORADA LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 9055064 Commercial CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.77 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 10 10 Yes No No Yes 16-10 9450 WEST LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 9055065 Commercial CN(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.92 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 25 25 Yes No No Yes 16-11 8404 WEST LN
STOCKTON CA 95210 9056001 Administrative Professional CO(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 0.73 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 4th and 5th 9 9 Yes No No Yes 16-12 7007 DANNY DR
STOCKTON CA 95210 9437002 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.05 0.4464 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 14 14 Yes No No Yes 16-13 6303 DANNY DR
STOCKTON CA 95210 9437009 Administrative Professional RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.05 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 25 25 Yes No No Yes 16-14 6304 DANNY DR
STOCKTON CA 95210 9437027 Administrative Professional RH(OUTSIDE) 17.5 30 1.98 0.8 Vacant NO - PrivatelyOwned 47 47 Yes No No Yes Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1325
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-23
Table A-2: Pipeline Projects
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Alicia Place 1625 TURNPIKE RD STOCKTON CA 95206 16504019 Commercial CG 3.68 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Alicia Place 76 0 1 77 3.68
Calaveras Quarters Motel
Conversion 2654 W MARCH LN 138 STOCKTON CA 95207 11002008 Commercial CG 2.14 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Calaveras Quarters Motel
Conversion 68 1 0 69 2.14
Cannery Park 3010 E EIGHT MILE RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202016 Industrial IL 19.09 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 3010 E EIGHT MILE RD && STOCKTON CA 95212 12202017 Industrial IL 7.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 3400 E EIGHT MILE RD A STOCKTON CA 95212 12202019 Industrial IL 38.59 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 3212 E EIGHT MILE RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202020 Industrial IL 6.65 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10719 HOLMAN RD & STOCKTON CA 95212 12202021 Open Space/Agriculture OS 3.39 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10719 HOLMAN RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202022 Open Space/Agriculture OS 10.93 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95212 12202023 Low Density Residential RL 3.19 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10880 HOLMAN RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202032 Commercial CG 12.21 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 3820 E EIGHT MILE RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202033 Commercial CG 19.89 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10724 HOLMAN RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202035 Open Space/Agriculture OS 11.1 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10616 HOLMAN RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202036 Low Density Residential RL 9.27 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 3745 PFC JESSE MIZENER ST STOCKTON CA 95212 12202037 Open Space/Agriculture OS 1.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12202038 Commercial CG 55.88 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10524 HOLMAN RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202039 Low Density Residential RL 6.59 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 3860 PFC JESSE MIZENER ST STOCKTON CA 95212 12202040 Low Density Residential RL 8.99 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10509 N STATE ROUTE 99 W FR RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202043 Commercial CG 11.89 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95212 12202046 Low Density Residential RL 11.51 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95212 12202048 Low Density Residential RL 0.72 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95212 12202049 Low Density Residential RL 1.43 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 10311 HOLMAN RD STOCKTON CA 95212 12202050 Low Density Residential RL 14.39 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12202056 Low Density Residential RL 8.44 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12218069 Low Density Residential 0.04 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219001 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219002 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219003 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219004 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219005 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219006 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219007 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219008 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219009 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219010 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219011 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1326
A-24 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Cannery Park 12219012 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219013 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219014 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219015 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219016 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219017 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219018 Low Density Residential RL 0.19 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219019 Low Density Residential RL 0.29 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219020 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219021 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219022 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219023 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219024 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219025 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219026 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219027 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219028 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219029 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219030 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219031 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219032 Low Density Residential RL 0.23 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219033 Low Density Residential RL 0.22 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219034 Low Density Residential RL 0.19 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219035 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219036 Low Density Residential RL 0.17 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219037 Low Density Residential RL 0.17 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219038 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219039 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219040 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219041 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219042 Low Density Residential RL 0.2 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219043 Low Density Residential RL 0.28 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219044 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219045 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219046 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219047 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219048 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219049 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219050 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1327
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-25
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Cannery Park 12219051 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219052 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219053 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219054 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219055 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219056 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219057 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219058 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219059 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219060 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219061 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219062 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219063 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219064 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219065 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219066 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219067 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219068 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219069 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219070 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219071 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219072 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12219073 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220001 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220002 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220003 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220004 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220005 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220006 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220007 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220008 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220009 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220010 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220011 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220012 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220013 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220014 Low Density Residential RL 0.22 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220015 Low Density Residential RL 0.41 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220016 Low Density Residential RL 0.19 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220017 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1328
A-26 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Cannery Park 12220018 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220019 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220020 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220021 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220022 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220023 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220024 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220025 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220026 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220027 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220028 Low Density Residential RL 0.19 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220029 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220030 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220031 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220032 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220033 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220034 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220035 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220036 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220037 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220038 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220039 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220040 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220041 Low Density Residential RL 0.24 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220042 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220043 Low Density Residential RL 0.19 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220044 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220045 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220046 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220047 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220048 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220049 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220050 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220051 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220052 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220053 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220054 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220055 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220056 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1329
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-27
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Cannery Park 12220057 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220058 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220059 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220060 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220061 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220062 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12220063 Low Density Residential RL 0.17 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221001 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221002 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221003 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221004 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221005 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221006 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221007 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221008 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221009 Low Density Residential RL 0.19 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221010 Low Density Residential RL 0.23 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221011 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221012 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221013 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221014 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221015 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221016 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221017 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221018 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221019 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221020 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221021 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221022 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221023 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221024 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221025 Low Density Residential RL 0.24 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221026 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221027 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221028 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221029 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221030 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221031 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221032 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221033 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1330
A-28 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Cannery Park 12221034 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221035 Low Density Residential RL 0.2 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221036 Low Density Residential RL 0.2 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221037 Low Density Residential RL 0.25 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221038 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221039 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221040 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221041 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221042 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221043 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221044 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221045 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221046 Low Density Residential RL 0.23 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221047 Low Density Residential RL 0.18 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221048 Low Density Residential RL 0.23 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221049 Low Density Residential RL 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221050 Low Density Residential RL 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221051 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221052 Low Density Residential RL 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221053 Low Density Residential RL 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221054 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221055 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221056 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221057 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221058 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221059 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221060 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221061 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221062 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221063 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221064 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221065 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221066 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Cannery Park 12221067 Low Density Residential RL 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Cannery Park 0 32 490 522 291.8
Crystal Bay 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6606001 Medium Density Residential RM 49.9 NO - Privately- Owned Crystal Bay 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6606002 Low Density Residential RL 62.63 NO - Privately- Owned Crystal Bay 7544 W EIGHT MILE RD STOCKTON CA 95219 6606003 Medium Density Residential RM 61.53 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1331
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-29
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Crystal Bay 0 67 1,276 1,343 174
Delta Cove 9821 N I 5 W FR RD STOCKTON CA 95219 7117002 Low Density Residential RL 259.52 NO - Privately- Owned Delta Cove 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 7117004 Low Density Residential RL 50 NO - Privately- Owned Delta Cove 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 7117005 Low Density Residential RL 50 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Delta Cove 0 77 1,468 1,545 359.52
Elderberry Residential Project 8404005 High Density Residential RH 12.46 NO - Privately- Owned Elderberry Residential Project 10601 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD STOCKTON CA 95209 8404007 Low Density Residential RL 6.34 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Elderberry Residential Project 0 0 42 42 18.8
Fairview Terrace 2244 S AIRPORT WY STOCKTON CA 95206 16915101 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 0.9 NO - Privately- Owned Fairview Terrace 2226 S AIRPORT WY STOCKTON CA 95206 16916301 Commercial CG(OUTSIDE) 0.71 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Fairview Terrace 76 0 0 76 1.61
Grand View Village 13913028 Commercial CD 0.79 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Grand View Village 75 0 0 75 0.79
Harding Apartments 645 W HARDING WY 15A STOCKTON CA 95204 13705006 Administrative Professional CO 1.02 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Harding Apartments 0 4 18 22 1.02
Hunter House New Apartments 610 N HUNTER ST STOCKTON CA 95202 13906033 Commercial CD 0.69 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Hunter House New Apartments 120 0 0 120 0.69
La Passeggiata Affordable
Housing Project 622 E LINDSAY ST STOCKTON CA 95202 13931025 Commercial CD 0.83 YES - State-Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres La Passeggiata Affordable
Housing Project 94 0 0 94 0.83
Mobile Homes On El Dorado 2424 S EL DORADO ST STOCKTON CA 95206 16707028 High Density Residential RH 7.06 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Mobile Homes On El Dorado 0 18 104 122 7.06
Park Center Apartments 13718030 High Density Residential CN 0.81 NO - Privately- Owned Park Center Apartments 21 W PARK ST STOCKTON CA 95202 13718031 High Density Residential RH 0.17 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Park Center Apartments 50 0 1 51 0.98
Sanctuary 7113013 Mixed Use MX 1546.17 NO - Privately- Owned Sanctuary 7113015 Mixed Use MX 1.73 NO - Privately- Owned Sanctuary 7113016 Mixed Use MX 205.92 NO - Privately- Owned Sanctuary 7113017 Mixed Use MX 79.49 NO - Privately- Owned Sanctuary 7113018 Mixed Use MX 110.86 NO - Privately- Owned Sanctuary 7113019 Mixed Use MX 6.29 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1332
A-30 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Sanctuary 0 0 5,758 5,758 1,950
Sonora Square Apartments E. Sonora Street between S. Center Street and S. El Dorado Street 14906217 Commercial CD 0.92 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Sonora Square Apartments 37 0 0 37 0.92
Swain Crossing Apartments 6045 TAM O SHANTER DR STOCKTON CA 95210 9405008 High Density Residential RH 1.58 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Swain Crossing Apartments 0 5 31 36 1.58
Tra Vigne 12002001 Commercial CG 0.92 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002002 Low Density Residential RL 83.08 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002003 Low Density Residential RL 38.34 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002013 Industrial IG 5.29 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002014 Industrial IG 10.28 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002015 Low Density Residential RL 98.02 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002017 Low Density Residential OS 25.53 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002018 Low Density Residential RL 5.68 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002019 Low Density Residential RL 12.66 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002022 Low Density Residential RL 20.21 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12002023 Low Density Residential RL 12.97 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12201002 Low Density Residential RL 2.84 NO - Privately- Owned Tra Vigne 12201004 Low Density Residential RL 2.23 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Tra Vigne 0 0 1,503 1,503 318.05
Trinity Parkway Apartments 5215 COSUMNES DR STOCKTON CA 95219 6602008 Mixed Use MX 4.32 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Trinity Parkway Apartments 0 18 102 120 4.32
University Park 13921008 Mixed Use MX 103.47 YES - State-Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres University Park 0 0 359 359 103.47
Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605014 Mixed Use MX 20.77 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605015 Mixed Use MX 0 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 5836 MELONES WY STOCKTON CA 95219 6633004 Mixed Use MX 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 10306 HADDONFIELD LN STOCKTON CA 95219 6633022 Mixed Use MX 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 10345 HADDONFIELD LN STOCKTON CA 95219 6633026 Mixed Use MX 0.16 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 10302 JERICHO DR STOCKTON CA 95219 6634016 Mixed Use MX 0.15 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 10129 BAY HARBOR DR STOCKTON CA 95219 6635040 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 10113 CAPETOWN LN STOCKTON CA 95219 6636028 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 5920 GREY GULL WY STOCKTON CA 95219 6636044 Mixed Use MX 0.5 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 5944 DUCK COVE LN STOCKTON CA 95219 6637047 Mixed Use MX 0.1 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1333
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-31
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Westlake at Spanos Park 10554 BERRY COVE WY STOCKTON CA 95219 6638005 Mixed Use MX 0.09 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 10534 SEAHORN DR STOCKTON CA 95219 6638023 Mixed Use MX 0.09 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 5945 MELONES WY STOCKTON CA 95219 6639005 Mixed Use MX 0.08 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 5829 MELONES WY STOCKTON CA 95219 6639038 Mixed Use MX 0.08 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 5862 PEBBLESTONE LN STOCKTON CA 95219 6639062 Mixed Use MX 0.09 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6641056 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6641070 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6642004 Mixed Use MX 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6642014 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6642028 Mixed Use MX 0.13 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6642042 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6642084 Mixed Use MX 0.14 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6644028 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6645053 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6645069 Mixed Use MX 0.28 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6646028 Mixed Use MX 0.12 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6646038 Mixed Use MX 0.11 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6649048 Mixed Use MX 2.16 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6649047 Mixed Use MX 2.23 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6649046 Mixed Use MX 4.76 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6647002 Mixed Use MX 16.27 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6646045 Mixed Use MX 1.24 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6605072 Mixed Use MX 7.8 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6605071 Mixed Use MX 24.41 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6605070 Mixed Use MX 39.49 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6605069 Mixed Use MX 23.1 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6605068 Mixed Use MX 20.75 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6605066 Mixed Use MX 15.04 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 6605060 Mixed Use MX 0.43 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605054 Mixed Use MX 0.69 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605051 Mixed Use MX 1.68 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605047 Mixed Use MX 10.35 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 7969 DEL WEBB CI STOCKTON CA 95219 6605046 Mixed Use MX 26.93 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605045 Mixed Use MX 35.04 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605043 Mixed Use MX 16.57 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 7970 DEL WEBB CI STOCKTON CA 95219 6605042 Mixed Use MX 19.36 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605041 Mixed Use MX 2.36 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605036 Mixed Use MX 2.73 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605035 Mixed Use MX 4.1 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605033 Mixed Use MX 13.31 NO - Privately- Owned Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1334
A-32 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PIPELINE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APN GENERAL PLAN ZONING PARCEL
ACREAGE PUBLICLY-OWNED
Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605032 Mixed Use MX 10.54 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605031 Mixed Use MX 2.21 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605020 Mixed Use MX 4.59 NO - Privately- Owned Westlake at Spanos Park 1 *UNASSIGNED STOCKTON CA 95219 6605016 Mixed Use MX 14.68 NO - Privately- Owned Project Summary Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Total Acres Westlake at Spanos Park 0 131 2,621 2,752 347.08
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1335
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-33
Sites Inventory Map Citywide
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1336
A-34 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M1
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1337
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-35
Sites Inventory Map M2
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1338
A-36 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M3
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1339
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-37
Sites Inventory Map M4
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1340
A-38 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M5
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1341
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-39
Sites Inventory Map M6
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1342
A-40 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M7
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1343
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-41
Sites Inventory Map M8
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1344
A-42 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M9
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1345
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-43
Sites Inventory Map M10
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1346
A-44 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M11
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1347
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-45
Sites Inventory Map M12
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1348
A-46 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M13
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1349
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-47
Sites Inventory Map M14
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1350
A-48 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M15
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1351
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-49
Sites Inventory Map M16
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1352
A-50 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M17
No units are counted towards the RHNA on sites 3-1 through 3-3, 4-1 through 4-14 and 4-27 through 4-30 Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1353
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-51
Sites Inventory Map M18
No units are counted towards the RHNA on sites 3-1 through 3-3, 4-1 through 4-14 and 4-27 through 4-30 Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1354
A-52 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M19
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1355
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-53
Sites Inventory Map M20
No units are counted towards the RHNA on sites 3-1 through 3-3, 4-1 through 4-14 and 4-27 through 4-30 Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1356
A-54 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M21
No units are counted towards the RHNA on sites 3-1 through 3-3, 4-1 through 4-14 and 4-27 through 4-30 Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1357
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-55
Sites Inventory Map M22
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1358
A-56 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M23
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1359
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-57
Sites Inventory Map M24
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1360
A-58 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M25
No units are counted towards the RHNA on sites 3-1 through 3-3, 4-1 through 4-14 and 4-27 through 4-30 Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1361
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-59
Sites Inventory Map M26
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1362
A-60 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Sites Inventory Map M27
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1363
APPENDIX A: LAND INVENTORY ANALYSIS A-61
Sites Inventory Map M28
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1364
A-62 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
This page intentionally left blank.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1365
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY B-1
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION
SUMMARY B
RELEASE OF PUBLIC
REVIEW DRAFT HOUSING
ELEMENT
The Public Review Draft Housing Element was released
for a 30-day public review of April 12, 2023. The City
notified the public through an eblast and posted the
draft on the City website.
Table B-1. Summary of Public Outreach
Outreach Event Type
Housing Action Plan/Displacement
Study Stakeholder Consultations
(Spring to Summer 2022)
Consultation interviews
Sites Workshop (September 14,
2022) Workshop
Housing Element/Housing Action
Plan Workshop (October 19,
2022)
Workshop
Housing Element Service Provider
Consultations (November 2022) Consultation interviews
Housing Sites Workshop (February
28, 2023) Workshop
HOUSING ELEMENT
SERVICE PROVIDER
CONSULTATIONS
In November 2022, seven consultations were
conducted with Stockton stakeholders to offer
opportunities for each of them to provide one-on-one
input. Representatives from the following organizations were interviewed:
• The Housing Authority of San Joaquin County
• San Joaquin Fair Housing
• Valley Mountain Regional Center, San Joaquin
County (Main Office)
• Disability Rights California
• Faith in the Valley
• Community Partnership for Families/The
Community Foundation of San Joaquin
In each of the consultations, the stakeholders were
asked some or all of the following questions, depending on the type of organization interviewed:
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1366
B-2 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
1. Opportunities and concerns: What are the three
top opportunities you see for the future of housing
in this jurisdiction? What are your three top
concerns for the future of housing in this
jurisdiction?
2. Housing Preferences: What housing types do your
clients prefer? Is there adequate rental housing in
the community? Are there opportunities for home
ownership? Are there accessible rental units for
seniors and persons with disabilities?
3. Housing barriers/needs: What are the biggest
barriers to finding affordable, decent housing?
What are the unmet housing needs in this
jurisdiction?
4. Housing Conditions: How would you characterize
the physical condition of housing in this jurisdiction? What opportunities do you see to improve housing
in the future?
5. How has COVID affected the housing situation?
Stakeholders discussed opportunities and concerns for
the future of housing in the city. Stakeholders described in detail seeing opportunity in increasing the variety of future developments, including mixed-use, infill
development, accessory dwelling units, etc.; spreading
out affordable housing rather than concentrating it;
improving local housing data; expanding housing
services and resources; updating the zoning code to be
more inclusive and accessible; and continuous
compliance with State law. At the same time,
participating stakeholders shared similar concerns,
including about the lack of existing affordable housing, homelessness, limited housing for formerly incarcerated individuals, and the amount of time it takes for
developments to be processed and built. Throughout
these consultations, stakeholders provided their
perspectives on the housing preferences of Stockton
residents. Most, if not all, described their clientele
preferring, at the bare minimum, safe, habitable,
accessible, stable, and affordable housing. Many
stakeholders described the issue of the majority of
Stockton renters being cost-burdened, meaning they
spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing
costs. Some stakeholders described the effect of many
people in Stockton resorting to uninhabitable housing
due to not being able to afford anything better. They
shared that landlords do not feel the pressure to fix units knowing that their tenants are desperate for housing as housing costs continue to increase while housing supply is very limited. In addition, stakeholders reported that due to migrations from the Bay Area, landlords have
evicted long-time tenants to make the unit available at higher, unreachable rental prices.
Throughout these consultations, stakeholders identified barriers to housing in Stockton, including limited
housing supply, affordability, renter application
requirements, fees and deposits, housing costs, the
court system, historic racism and segregation, the
criminalization of the unhoused population, and lack of political will from elected officials. The unmet housing needs in Stockton, according to these stakeholders, are that there isn’t enough habitable and affordable
housing in the city, especially for populations on a fixed income. Stakeholders specified that housing conditions
varied depending on what part of the city you were in. It was shared that the southside faces more dilapidation
issues, and the conditions are believed to be worse
compared to the rest of the state. Many residents take
what they can afford, and it has been reported that
includes housing that is uninhabitable.
Stakeholders shared that the factors that limit equity and fair housing are rooted in systemic racism, capitalism, sexism, and ableism. To begin to address these equity
and fair housing concerns, stakeholders believe that the City needs to incorporate programs that reflect the
needs of those most vulnerable in the Stockton
community. This can include programs that support
affordable housing developments, an eviction
protection and right to counsel program, developing a
dedicated housing trust fund for affordable housing,
landlord educational tools and resources, genuine
advocacy for the homeless, a universal income
program, a reasonable accommodation process, and
social housing opportunities for people to co-own
areas/property. They share that when placing new
affordable housing developments, they should avoid
being concentrated in a single area, and should be
spread out equitably throughout the city. They also
shared that the City should ensure all new developments have an inclusionary housing component, which can be
done by adopting inclusionary housing policies and
programs.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1367
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY B-3
HOUSING ACTION
PLAN/DISPLACEMENT
STUDY STAKEHOLDER
CONSULTATIONS
In support of efforts to prepare a Housing Action Plan
for the City of Stockton, consultant team member BAE
Urban Economics participated in a total of ten interviews with area stakeholders in the Spring and Summer of
2022 regarding issues and opportunities for the
production and preservation of housing. Additional
interviews will be conducted in the spring of 2023 with market rate developers to inform preparation of pro
forma financial models for target housing types in
Stockton. Due to significant overlap in the subject
matter targeted for this initial round of interviews, and the list of stakeholders to be interviewed, BAE partnered with Enterprise Community Partners which was similarly
engaged in preparation of an anti-displacement
strategy for the City of Stockton. Participants in the first round of interviews included representatives from the
following:
• Stocktonians Taking Action to Neutralize Drugs
(STAND)
• Visionary Home Builders
• The Housing Authority of San Joaquin County
• Central Valley Low Income Housing (CVLIHC)
• Reinvent South Stockton Coalition (RSSC)
• Housing Justice Coalition (Part of the RSSC)
• National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People (NAACP)
• Enterprise Community Partners
• Grupe Huber Company
• Little Manila Rising
While the topics covered during each interview varied
slightly based on the expertise and affiliation of the
interview participant, all of the interviews covered the following topic areas:
• Housing Needs and Preferences – What types of
housing are your clients or constituents looking
for? What types of housing are they most
struggling to locate and secure? What are the
barriers they are facing? Where do they
typically end up?
• Housing Instability and Insecurity – What types
of housing insecurity are being observed? What
trends, factors, or characteristics are
contributing to housing insecurity among your
clients or in your community? What solutions
are being used?
• Gaps in Housing Availability – What types of
housing are being undersupplied in the
Stockton Market? What types are being over
supplied? Why?
• Barriers to Housing Production – What are the
main barriers to housing production in
Stockton? How does this vary by housing type
(e.g., single-family homes, missing middle
housing, multifamily apartments, tiny homes,
etc.)? Do the barriers to housing production
vary in different parts of the community?
• Barriers to Housing Preservation – What are the
main barriers to the preservation of existing
housing? What should the City be doing to
facilitate housing preservation?
• Causes of Residential Displacement – What are
the main observed drivers of residential
displacement? How are your clients or
constituents being impacted? How are different
groups or populations impacted? How are
different parts of the city being impacted and
why?
Interview participants expressed a range of perspectives and experiences, but generally agreed on the underlying economic factors contributing to a lack of desired
housing production in Stockton. All interview
participants acknowledged an overabundance of
detached single family housing in Stockton, which
represents a majority of the newly built housing
inventory. Interview participants acknowledged an
under production, and lack of general availability, of
higher density multifamily rental and missing middle
housing, both rental and for-sale, that would meet the
needs of their clients. Participants indicated that new construction is generally concentrated in the more
affluent neighborhoods in north Stockton, and that there are large areas that are going unserved by new marketrate development, but which feature populations that would benefit from an expansion of the housing
inventory, such as in south Stockton and the downtown
area. These areas tend to be lower-income and
residents often have less mobility, but which still offer robust neighborhood networks and cultural affiliations.
The reasons cited for the lack of development in these
areas include the high cost of construction and the
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1368
B-4 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
relatively limited purchasing power of lower-income
households in these areas.
Interviews indicated that a lack of newly constructed
housing is putting tenants under pressure to accept
housing that is, at least in some cases, in substandard condition and often more expensive than is typically
considered appropriate. Participants indicated a
relatively high prevalence of multiple households
banding together to afford housing, resulting in
overcrowded conditions, as well as households paying
well over the accepted 30 percent of their income
towards housing. Due to a lack of alternative housing
options, households are often reluctant to submit
complaints about substandard conditions and are
unable to secure housing at more affordable rates. This is particularly prevalent among renter households,
though interview participants also noted problems
among lower-income owner households who are
having trouble maintaining their homes. This sometimes
results in foreclosure or condemnation, but more often
in the household selling the property, often at a
suppressed value due to the condition of the property.
Multiple interview participants noted that many of these houses are then being purchased by higher-income
households. The impression is that they are coming from outside the area, and that they subsequently rehabilitate the property and benefit from immediate equity
appreciation. Interview participants voiced concerns
that this dynamic prevents lower-income homeowners
from fully benefiting from potential equity appreciation.
Participants recommended increased funding for code
enforcement and an enhanced multifamily rental
inspection program to identify habitability issues.
Participants also recommended increasing funding for
home rehabilitation assistance to help keep lowerincome homeowners in their homes and to discourage displacement and gentrification.
Interviewees noted that housing instability and
displacement in Stockton is really a function of high and increasing housing costs, both for new construction and existing units, and stagnation among local workforce
wages and associated household incomes. The
pandemic exacerbated these trends with many lowerwage and service sector workers either losing their jobs or taking significant unpaid leaves of absence due to
business closures and work-from-home policies.
Interview participants experienced a significant increase in the need for homelessness prevention and rapid
rehousing services during the first two years of the
pandemic, which is now beginning to abate with the
revocation of pandemic-era restrictions. Interviewees
commented that the City needs to pursue an aggressive
expansion of the housing stock (something other than
detached single-family homes) to address the lack of
inventory, as well as strong economic development
programs that can improve the earning potential of
existing Stockton residents. Without both an increase in housing availability and the ability of households to pay for housing, the issue will continue to get worse and the number of households facing housing instability will
grow.
To facilitate the production of low-income housing, as
well as transitional and permanent supportive housing,
interview participants indicate that the City needs to
adjust expectations regarding funding recapture,
allowing more grants and forgivable loans.
Interviewees also suggested the City needs to increase
its willingness to allow funding to go towards supportive services and that the City needs to consider programs to reopen existing single room occupancy (SRO) properties
and/or facilitate development of new SRO properties in
appropriate locations. They suggested the City also
needs strong policies and programs to preserve
naturally occurring affordable housing, where possible.
Examples of these policies and programs may include,
but should not be limited to, rehabilitation funding for both rental and ownership properties, possibly coupled
with workforce housing deed restrictions (i.e., limited to occupancy by households with at least one person
employed within the community), rental assistance and
grants for back rent, cash incentives to property owners willing to accept tenants using public assistance, etc.
Interview participants generally supported efforts to
expand the housing stock with a preference for the
addition of both market rate and below-market rate
rental housing. There is a desire to see such
development both in higher income areas that can
provide better access to opportunity for lower-income
households, but also within lower opportunity areas
where households are experiencing the greatest need.
All interview participants also acknowledged that the
City’s aim should be to avoid adding additional lowincome housing inventory in the downtown, as the city Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1369
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY B-5
is already at risk of creating conditions associated with concentrated poverty, which run counter to the longterm objectives of the community towards creating a commercially and culturally vibrant downtown
environment for all Stockton residents. The challenge
seems to be that that is where the infrastructure capacity is concentrated and where it may be possible to secure
land zoned for high density housing at a relatively low cost (i.e. City owned). Also, the area is unlikely to
experience market rate housing development in the near
future, so it can often be attractive to try to leverage lowincome housing to try and spur investment.
Residents participated in the workshop by Zoom.
Many stakeholders believe that the COVID-19
pandemic has unveiled serious housing issues, as well
as simultaneously making them worse. Due to the
pandemic, there were economic shutdowns and job
losses that put many people at risk of homelessness or
became homeless, increasing the homeless population.
The pandemic increased the number of households
needing resources and services; however, the
distribution of these resources are not equitable.
Stakeholders shared that during the pandemic, prisons
released large amounts of formerly incarcerated
individuals who needed housing and were at risk or
became homeless. They saw a rise in domestic violence
cases, and due to Project HomeKey, all hotels in the
surrounding area were booked, leaving agencies
unable to place domestic violence survivors in a safe
space. During COVID, the pressures of Bay Area
migration to Stockton were exacerbated, including rising rents due to limited supply. The eviction moratorium
provided safety for economically impacted renters but
impacted landlords through a lack of resources.
Overall, COVID has negatively impacted housing in
Stockton.
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS
Throughout the Housing Element process, the City Staff
has conducted workshops to guide its development.
SITES WORKSHOP, SEPTEMBER 14,
2022
The first community workshop for Stockton residents as
part of the Housing Element update took place via
Zoom on Wednesday, September 14, 2022, from 5:00
pm to 7:00 pm. The purpose of this workshop was to
educate residents about the update process, solicit input on potential housing sites to be included in the draft
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1370
B-6 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
Housing Element and priority sites to include in the
Housing Action Plan, and hear resident insights and
ideas on how the City can improve housing
opportunities in the future. Spanish translation was
available during the workshop.
City staff and consultants facilitated the workshop and 20 residents and interested persons attended and
participated. Throughout the presentation about the
Housing Element update process and the selection
criteria for potential housing sites, community members were asked to provide feedback through interactive
polling and invited to ask questions or provide
comments in the chat. All questions and comments were
read aloud, and either City staff or the consultants
answered the question or documented receipt of the
comment. The following are top questions and
comments that were fielded by staff during the meeting. • Participants asked about and requested ADU
resources, such as grants and preapproved
ADU plans.
• Participant asked about Public-private
collaboration with nonprofit for affordable
housing development
• Participant asked about Affirmatively Furthering
Fair Housing (AFFH) implementation
• Participant asked if the City evaluates Missed
Housing Development Opportunities
• Participant commented that housing should not
be placed in areas with existing Issues in areas
where sites are located, such as food deserts
and being environmental justice issues
During this workshop, attendees were asked to
participate in a series of polls and select their preferred responses. The following poll questions were asked:
1. Which housing groups do you think Stockton needs
to focus on and provide housing for? (Select up to
three)
2. What type of housing is needed in Stockton?
3. To decide which sites are priorities for housing
development, what criteria is most important to
you?
The first poll question’s results reflect the respondents’ selection of who they believe the City needs to provide housing for. The top three populations are homeless or
recent homeless individuals, low-income households,
and persons with disabilities. For the second polling
question, the majority of respondents believe that the
type of housing Stockton needs is mixed-use and rental
apartments. For the final polling question, respondents believed that access to grocery stores, restaurants, and shopping, as well as including affordable housing are
the most important criteria.
There were a set of discussion questions presented to
residents during this virtual meeting. The following
questions were asked of attendees:
1. What neighborhoods or street corridors in Stockton
should be developed with new housing?
2. Why isn’t housing being built in Stockton?
3. What’s preventing the types of housing you’d like to see from being built?
These comments have been considered and
incorporated into the Housing Element, as applicable.
The community workshop was recorded and posted on
the City’s Housing Element webpage.
HOUSING ELEMENT/HOUSING ACTION
PLAN WORKSHOP, OCTOBER 19, 2022
The second community workshop, as part of the
Housing Element update and Housing Action Plan
preparation process, took place in person at the Buskirk Community Center on Wednesday, October 29, 2022,
from 5:00 pm to 7:00 pm. The purpose of this workshop
was to educate residents about the Housing Element
update and Housing Action Plan processes and an
opportunity for attendees to share their ideas and ask
related questions. Spanish translation was available
during the workshop, and translation for additional
languages was available upon request.
City staff and consultants facilitated the workshop and 20 residents and interested persons attended and
participated. Throughout the presentation about the
Housing Element update and Housing Action Plan
process and the selection criteria for potential housing sites, community members were asked to provide
feedback through interactive polling and invited to ask questions or provide comments in the chat. All questions and comments were read aloud, and either City staff or
the consultants answered the question or documented
receipt of the comment. The following is a paraphrased
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1371
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY B-7
list of the top questions and comments that were fielded by staff during the meeting.
• Participant requested Migration data of people
moving to Stockton from the Bay Area.
• Participant asked more information about New
state housing laws, including laws that allow
housing in commercial zones.
• Participant asked for further explanation about
information about evictions.
• Participant emphasized the importance to
evaluate fair housing issues before deciding
where new housing should go/where to build.
• Participant asked about the type of input the
City wanted at this workshop. They wanted to
know the distinction between wanting to know
about housing types and what amenities should
be included.
• Participant asked if there is data in the plan
about how much of the housing stock is renter
or owner-occupied. They also asked about how
many residential units in the city are owned by
non-resident property owners/investors?
• Participant stated that the draft RHNA sites on
the online web map have many lower income
sites in the downtown and shared their concerns
because it is a polluted area that has very high
CalEnviroScreen scores.
• Participants shared homelessness concerns,
including local groups reporting 5,000
homeless persons, HCD considering homeless
sweeps as a fair housing issue, and stopping the
implementation of the no camping ordinance
that would go into effect October 2022.
• Participant stated 80 percent of Stockton
residents are cost burdened.
• A Disability Rights CA representative offered a
fair housing training to the City (for decision
makers or staff). Another person noted that the
Planning Commission and City Council need to
be educated on AFFH.
• Participant requested updating the presentation
and housing tools board to make more sense
to the lay person.
• Participant asked about the City webpage
where they cover what the Community
Development Department doesn’t do.
• Staff noted that the City allows up to four units
by right (already in zoning, not just since Senate
Bill 9 went into effect) in all residential zones.
This means density can increase in most areas
of the city, not just downtown.
There were a set of discussion questions presented to
residents during this virtual meeting. The following
questions were asked of attendees:
1. What do you think are the most critical housing
issues in your community?
2. What do you think are the housing types most
needed in the community?
3. When assessing new housing development that
might be built in the next 8 to 10 years, what should
be the community’s most important consideration?
4. Is there anything else that you can share regarding
additional housing opportunities in the community?
5. Any suggestions for soliciting additional Housing
Element feedback?
These comments have been considered and
incorporated into the Housing Element, as applicable.
HOUSING SITES WORKSHOP,
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
The third community workshop occurred on February
28, 2023, at the Cesar Chavez Central Library, from
5:00 pm to 7:00 pm. The purpose of this workshop was
to engage the community and share information about
the draft Housing Element and Housing Action Plan
sites. The purpose was also to receive the community’s
input regarding the prospective sites and share their
insights on the best sites to catalyze housing
development.
City Staff and consultants facilitated the meeting with 16 residents and interested persons, as well as one council member who attended and participated. The
presentation focused on the Housing Element update’s
sites inventory and the Housing Action Plan’s priority
sites. After the presentation, a questions and answers
session invited attendees to ask questions and provide
their input. The following is a paraphrased list of top questions and comments that were fielded by staff
during the meeting.
• Participant asked what a pipeline project is?
• Participant asked what happens if the City does
not meet its RHNA requirements?
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1372
B-8 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
• Participant asked why specific letters were only
sent to owners and did not consider renters?
• Participant asked for an explanation about the
methodology utilized to categorize units per
income level?
• Participant commented that the Master planned
communities need more amenities other than
roadways.
• Participants asked about developer and
development related issues, such as why it can
take a long time to complete, city and
developer communication, and developer
stagnancy.
• Participant asked if there are Housing Element
programs that address issues for vulnerable
populations, such as homelessness and tenant
protection programs?
• Participant asked about the relationship
between the different City efforts (the Housing
Element Update, Housing Action Plan, and
Zoning Consistency project).
• Participant commented that there are multiple
lower income sites concentrated in R/ECAP
areas and areas with high CalEnviroScreen
scores.
• Participant asked if these sites are shovel ready
and/or SB-9 approved?
• Participant asked if the Housing Action Plan will
address the affordability gap in pipeline
projects?
• Participant asked how breakdown of sites to
meet the RHNA will be determined?
• Participant asked if the City gives bonds to help
construction costs?
• Participant asked how the Housing Action Plan
useful if it is not legally binding?
• Participant asked if the priority sites are all of
the RHNA sites?
• Participant asked if the City is going to make
CEQA streamlining recommendations to the
State?
• Participant commented that the City does not
do anything to help low-income communities
on the outskirts of its jurisdiction.
HOUSING ELEMENT WORKSHOP,
APRIL 10, 2023
A community workshop occurred on April 10, 2023, at
the Cesar Chavez Central Library, from 5:00 pm to
7:00 pm. The purpose of this workshop was to engage
the community and share information about the public
draft Housing Element. The purpose was also to receive
the community’s input regarding the draft of the
Housing element including the fair housing findings,
sites inventory, and drafted programs.
City Staff and consultants facilitated the meeting with 11 residents and interested persons. Spanish interpreters
were present at the meeting. The presentation focused
on the Housing Element update’s drafted sites inventory and programs. After the presentation, a questions and
answers session invited attendees to ask questions and
provide their input. The following is a paraphrased list of top questions and comments that were fielded by staff during the meeting.
• Participant asked if there are sub-categories
within lower income RHNA?
• Participant asked when next meeting on the
Housing Action Plan is and if there will be a
draft available?
• Participant asked if there are penalties for
noncompliance both in terms of Housing
Element certification and achieving RHNA
during the planning period?
• Participant asked if there are mixed income
sites/projects that could happen?
• Participant asked how sites are assigned to
RHNA categories and default density?
• Participant commented that some identified
sites have constraints and that is why they
haven’t developed yet. For example, title issues,
infrastructure issues, environmental constraints.
• Participant commented that the City process
has improved in terms of working with
applicants and saying yes to projects.
• Participant asked for the deadline to submit
public comments.
• Participant asked if the City is required to build
housing? They also asked if the RHNA number
is for eight years?
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1373
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY B-9
• Participant asked if the RHNA numbers are not
built, do they ‘roll over’ to the next Housing
Element?
• Participant asked if there was any canvassing
done? If yes, does staff had information on
where those people live?
• Participant asked who owned the land identified
for housing in the sites inventory?
• Participant asked how the City is streamlining
affordable housing permit processes?
• Participant asked if affordability levels can be
split up more?
• Participant asked what happens if the Housing
Element is not in compliance?
• Participant asked if the City has policies in place
to support mixed income development?
• Participant asked if the City can support
conversion of vacant lots in South Stockton?
• Participant commented that the City does not
do anything to help low-income communities
on the outskirts of its jurisdiction.
STOCKTON HOUSING JUSTICE
COALITION HOUSING ELEMENT
WORKSHOP, MAY 3, 2023
On May 3, 2023 the Stockton Housing Justice Coalition
held a public community meeting to discuss the Draft
6th Cycle Housing Element. The following housing
barriers and desired policies and programs were
identified by participants:
Issue/Barriers
• Lack of housing for low-income residents +
emergency placements
• Creating housing in vacant properties
• Housing for people with disabilities
o On SSI
o Even with benefits, still unaffordable need
to have a universal definition of what lowincome is and what is affordable • Keeping people in their homes tenant
protections
• Low-income people of color only able to live in
polluted + undesirable places
• Acceptance of housing vouchers discrimination
• Transitional housing for formerly incarcerated
• Housing stock quality
• Tenant resources navigation
• Criminalization of unhoused residents
• A lot of vacant buildings in downtown
• Tenant bill of rights, including Right to Counsel
• Environmental (racial, social) justice housing
near polluted sites
• Concentrating poverty new units all together,
without amenities
Desired policies and programs
• New tenant protection policies
o Funding legal aid
• Preservation programs for existing market
housing
• Community land trusts
• Vacant building tax
• Enforcement against discrimination
• Public education on rights + processes (radio,
classrooms)
• Navigation for unhoused
• HDAP at CA DSS → housing while applying for
SSI
o Needs to be bigger
• Extending “Just Cause” to single-family
• Universal Income for renters
• Mitigation requirements for siting in industrial +
highway areas
• Eviction diversion program
• Inclusionary requirements for specific groups
domestic violence victims
• Sidewalks
• Audit of existing programs
• More mixed income sitting choice
• City should buy more land everywhere for future
development
• Partnering with school districts for teacher
housing
• Rent control/lower + enforcement rent cap
• Help for people + remove barriers on rental
applications
o Credit
o Domestic violence victims
o Exceptions or minimums
• Mitigate landlord concerns cleanup funds, etc.
• More landlord tenant/mediation
• Require provisions of written lease
• Rental registry
• Grants for ramps
• Subsidies for ADUs streamlining
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1374
B-10 ENVISION 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PLANNING
COMMISSION AND CITY
COUNCIL MEETINGS
PLANNING COMMISSION, APRIL 27,
2023
The Planning Commission held a study session on the
Draft Housing Element on April 27, 2023, that began
at 5:30pm. The purpose of this study session was to
receive direction on draft Goals, Policies, and Programs before submittal to the state for their initial review and to receive any missing housing topics that should be
explored in the Housing Element.
City Staff and consultants facilitated the meeting with the Planning Commission. The public was also invited to
attend. The presentation focused on the outreach
efforts, Housing Element Fair Housing findings,
incorporated community feedback and new,
continued/modified programs. After the presentation, a
discussion was opened, the following is a paraphrased
list of notes from Planning Commissioners that are
divided into topics:
The following were questions asked by Planning
Commissioners:
• Planning Commissioner asked if there are
specific concerns regarding the length of
approval for housing?
• Planning Commissioner commented that the
word inclusionary is thrown around a lot, in
regards to housing, and asked what
inclusionary means or how is it defined?
• Planning Commissioner expressed concerns
about displacement and gentrification from out
of area buyers.
• Planning Commissioner commented about
barriers associated with rental applications.
• Planning Commissioner commented about the
condition of rental housing.
• Planning Commissioner recommended for
eviction protections.
• Planning Commissioner commented about the
housing needs of special need groups.
• Planning Commissioner expressed concern
regarding the higher rate of overpayment
among renters
• Planning Commissioner asked what are
governmental constraints?
• Planning Commissioner asked if the proposed
ordinance consider protections for potential
overpayments from the city for public utility use
in particular water and electricity?
• Planning Commissioner asked if City was to
provide that feedback before May 12th from the
public how would we get that information?
• Planning Commissioner asked how long until
the Housing Element comes back again?
The following were questions asked by the public:
• Participant commented that they would like to
see very low-income housing addressed in the
Housing Element.
• Participant commented that they want a more
defined plan to identify and prevent
homelessness and help people move out of
homelessness.
• Participant asked what an e-blast is?
WRITTEN PUBLIC
COMMENTS
Written public comments are included in Appendix C.
RESPONSE TO INPUT
RECEIVED
City’s response to written public comments is included
in Appendix C in a cover letter and annotated
attachments to the cover letter.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1375
APPENDIX C: PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSE C-1
APPENDIX C: PUBLIC
COMMENTS AND
RESPONSE C
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1376
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1377
June 6, 2023
To all Interested Parties
Re: Public Review of the Draft 2023-2031 Housing Element The City recently concluded its Public Review of the 6th Cycle Draft 2023-2031 Housing Element, which received three comment letters. The City staff would like to express their gratitude to all those who provided feedback and participated in various meetings related to Housing and Zoning. These workshops were instrumental in preparing the Draft Housing Element.
This letter formally responds to mutual themes expressed in the three comment letters received and corresponds to specific items in the Annotated Comment letters contained in Attachments A through C.
Revisions to the Draft Housing Element
Based on residents, stakeholders, and City staff comments, the Draft Housing Element has been revised to reflect the following summarized changes. These changes are categorized by topic and can be seen in track change form in the revised Policy Chapter in Attachment D.
• Housing Protections: Policies and programs have been revised to indicate the City’s commitment to exploring various requirements and incentives for housing protections.
• Housing Capacity and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Site Analysis: As Housing Capacity sites (a.k.a. RHNA sites) are oriented toward housing production while the other targets explicitly housing for certain groups, the City will continue to seek direction from the State on how these analyses should be implemented together. While a few housing capacity sites have been removed, staff was careful not to impact the overall housing capacity surplus as it could restrict the development options for the remaining housing sites. Furthermore, the Housing Action Plan will explore additional housing capacity options not listed in the Housing Element or required by state housing law. Those sites could include county land within the sphere of influence, underutilized infill lots, underutilized buildings within the downtown area, and potential redevelopment areas. • Development Code Overhaul: Policies and Programs have been revised to highlight potential zoning code revisions to increase housing production for all incomes and groups. These revisions include the following:
o allowing housing in more zoning designations,
o provide more housing options,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Permit Center 345 N. El Dorado Street Stockton, CA 952027 (209) 937-8444 Fax (209) 937-8893 www.stocktonca.gov
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1378
o adding new processes for increasing development densities, o additional infill allowances,
o new zoning overlays to provide specific standards for particular neighborhoods, and
o performance standards for new development to reduce potential impacts. • Housing Action Plan (HAP): While the draft HAP has not been released, City staff is still seeking feedback from potential document users (residents, housing advocates, developers) on what should be in the document. The HAP will build from the Housing Element programs and explore additional strategies and recommendations to implement housing goals further. Areas of research include, but are not limited to:
o development process summary for all types of housing (emergency, transitional, permanent),
o proformas to explore funding options to reduce the cost gap in new housing construction,
o infill development toolkit
o list of funding and partnerships in the area for each housing need, o case studies on projects and redevelopment areas, and o detailed recommendations for specific topics and projects covered in the HAP.
• Additional Outreach: Between Fall 2022 and Spring 2023, City staff sent thousands of mailed notices to owners, dozens of notices to the Record and email group, hosted over fifteen Shape Stockton workshops, conducted dozens of interviews with stakeholders and held numerous meetings with residents and stakeholders. City staff will work with local and regional partners to explore additional opportunities for feedback before hearings for adoptions begin. These opportunities could include but are not limited to, the following:
o Conduct follow-up interviews with all stakeholders contacted and interviewed. o Provide bilingual notices to local community organizations (schools, event centers, religious facilities, etc.) and attend meetings and gatherings where appropriate.
o Continue to attend “Go-to-them-Events” when time allows. Past events are listed on the Shape Stockton website at Community Participation - City of Stockton (stocktongov.com).
o Additional notifications in English and Spanish within local magazines and informational flyers.
o Coordinate with Community groups and representatives to explore additional contacts and neighborhoods to reach out to.
o Translate additional workshop materials into Spanish. o Create videos in English and Spanish summarizing all housing efforts with information on how to get involved.
A summary of all comments received for the Shape Stockton effort can be viewed on the Shape Stockton website at Shape Stockton - City of Stockton (stocktongov.com). Shape Stockton consists of grant-funded efforts that include updates to the City’s Development Code and Design Guidelines, required Housing Element Update, permit software improvements, and Housing and Neighborhood Action Plans. Housing-related comments from these efforts can be found in Attachment E.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1379
Next Steps
Moving forward, the City staff will conduct the following. • Upload the revised Draft Housing Element and comment letters to the City’s website.
• Submit the revised Draft Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for them to begin their State required compliance review.
• Conduct follow-up interviews with stakeholders to see what else is needed and what other groups/residents should be contacted.
• Continue outreach on the Draft Housing Element and Housing Action Plan consistent with the feedback from the stakeholder interviews and the options included in this letter.
Again, City staff would like to thank everyone who contributed to Draft Housing Element and Shape Stockton efforts. While much work remains, City staff appreciates the feedback received and looks forward to working with the community to address housing in the City of Stockton.
If you have any questions regarding the information in this letter, contact me by phone at 209 937-8598 or by e-mail at [email protected].
Matt Diaz, AICP
Advanced Planning Manager
Attachments
A. Annotated St. Mary’s Dining Room Comment Letter dated May 12, 2023 B. Annotated Stockton Housing Justice Coalition Comment Letter dated May 12, 2023 C. Annotated Disability Rights California (DRC) Comment Letter dated May 15, 2023 D. Revised Housing Element Policy Chapter with Track Changes E. Shape Stockton Housing and Neighborhood Comments
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1380
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1381
May 12, 2023
Input on the Draft Housing Element
Dear City of Stockton,
Thank you for the work that the Shape Stockton team has done in developing the first draft of the Housing Element. They have been very open to input and encouraging community participation. I appreciate this opportunity to provide our feedback as well.
St. Mary's is one of the largest homeless service agencies in Stockton, serving over 5,000 individuals a year. We provide meals, showers, clothing and social services to homeless individuals who are staying in the shelters, residing in the encampments, or living in their cars. We also serve households from the surrounding low-income neighborhoods who are very low income and at risk of homelessness. For our clients, the lack of housing to fit their needs is extremely detrimental.
The main component that I feel is missing from the Housing Element is a housing plan for extremely low income households. It is a sub-category of the larger group titled "Very Low Income". This category covers a wide range of incomes - anyone below 50% of area median income. This category is too broad and does not adequately address the needs of the lowest income households. It appears that there is no specific Regional Housing Needs Allocation for the extremely low income sub-category.
I feel that specific planning is needed to address the housing needs of those with extremely low incomes (below 25% AMI). This includes many individuals with a disability, an increasing number of seniors, and others with special needs. Housing to meet their needs is critical to both preventing homelessness and helping people exit out of homelessness. We have many clients who come to us because their rents kept increasing until they became so high that they could no longer afford them, so they had to move out into an emergency shelter. Similarly, when our clients are working to move out of a shelter, they are often unable to find any apartment that they can afford or landlords who will accept their income level, so they remain stuck at the shelter.
The Housing Element can be an important piece of addressing this problem, by developing a comprehensive housing plan to ensure adequate housing for those with extremely low incomes.
Thank you for your consideration.
Petra Linden
Chief Executive Officer
545 W. Sonora Street, Stockton, CA 95203 • (209) 467-0703, Fax (209) 467-7795 11 www.stmarysdiningroom.org • Tax ID 94-2687280 Commented [GU1]: The Extremely Low Income RHNA
is estimated based on HCD guidance on page BR-10.
In addition, more information about residents in this
income category is provided on page BR-43.
Commented [GU2]: Program 7 and 10 address
Extremely Low Income households.
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element 1382
0D\
7R
6WHSKDQLH2FDVLR'LUHFWRURI&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW
0DWW'LD]$GYDQFHG3ODQQLQJ0DQDJHU
7ULVWDQ2VERUQ6HQLRU3ODQQHU$GYDQFHG3ODQQLQJ
3ODFHZRUNV
0D\RU.HYLQ/LQFROQ
9LFH0D\RU.LPEHUO\:DUPVOH\
&RXQFLOPHPEHU0LFKHOOH3DGLOOD
&RXQFLOPHPEHU'DQ:ULJKW
&RXQFLOPHPEHU0LFKDHO%ORZHU
&RXQFLOPHPEHU6XVDQ/HQ]
&RXQFLOPHPEHU%UDQGR9LOODSXGXD
&F
'DYLG=LVVHU$VVLVWDQW'HSXW\'LUHFWRU+&'
0HOLQGD&R\/DQG8VHDQG3ODQQLQJ0DQDJHU+&'
-RVH$\DOD+RXVLQJ3ROLF\6SHFLDOLVW+&'
5(
&LW\RI6WRFNWRQWK&\FOH'UDIW+RXVLQJ(OHPHQW
'HDU&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQW6WDII&RQVXOWDQWV0D\RU/LQFROQDQG&LW\ &RXQFLOPHPEHUV
7KDQN\RXIRUWKHRSSRUWXQLW\WRFRPPHQWRQWKHWK&\FOH'UDIW+RXVLQJ(OHPHQWIRUWKH&LW\ RI6WRFNWRQ
7KH 6WRFNWRQ +RXVLQJ -XVWLFH &RDOLWLRQ LV D UHVLGHQWFHQWHUHG RUJDQL]DWLRQ WKDW HPSRZHUV 6WRFNWRQLDQVWRDGYRFDWHIRUSROLFLHVDQGVROXWLRQVWKDWSURWHFWWHQDQWVDQGSURPRWHDIIRUGDEOH KRXVLQJWKURXJK VNLOOEXLOGLQJHGXFDWLRQRUJDQL]LQJDQG VWRU\WHOOLQJ7KHIROORZLQJ FRPPHQWV TXHVWLRQV DQG UHFRPPHQGDWLRQVWRWKH WK &\FOH 'UDIW +RXVLQJ(OHPHQW DUH LQIRUPHG E\WKH &RDOLWLRQ¶V GLUHFW H[SHULHQFH ZLWK DIIRUGDEOH KRXVLQJ LQ WKH &LW\ RI 6WRFNWRQ DV ZHOO DV RXU H[SHULHQFHLQWHUDFWLQJZLWKUHVLGHQWVDQGDWWHPSWLQJWRDGGUHVVWKHLUKRXVLQJQHHGV 3ROLF\'RFXPHQW
7KH &RDOLWLRQ DSSUHFLDWHV WKH GUDIW¶V IRFXV RQ KRXVLQJ SURGXFWLRQ 7KLV IRFXV LV ZHDYHG WKURXJKRXWQHDUO\DOORIWKHVWDWHG*RDOVDQGDVVRFLDWHG3ROLFLHV+RZHYHUSURGXFWLRQRULHQWHG SROLFLHV RQ WKHLU RZQ GR QRW UHVSRQG GLUHFWO\WRWKH DQDO\VLV FRQGXFWHG HOVHZKHUH ZLWKLQWKH Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element
1383
'UDIW +RXVLQJ (OHPHQW
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
3URYLGH+LJK 4XDOLW\ +RXVLQJ IRU$OO,QFRPH
*URXSV 3URJUDP VWDWHV WKDW WKH &LW\ ZLOO FRQWLQXH DGPLQLVWHULQJ LWV H[LVWLQJ HQWLWOHPHQW SURJUDPV WR IXQG ORFDO KRXVLQJ SURJUDPV WR VXSSRUW WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI H[WUHPHO\ ORZ YHU\ORZ DQG ORZLQFRPH XQLWV ,W DOVR VWDWHV WKDW ORZLQFRPH KRXVHKROGV ZLOO UHFHLYHDVVLVWDQFHIURPWKH&LW\¶VGRZQSD\PHQW DVVLVWDQFH SURJUDP 7KH RQO\ HYDOXDWLRQ GDWD WKH &RDOLWLRQ ZDV DEOH WR UHYLHZ LV LQ D GUDIW RI WKH &LW\¶V &RQVROLGDWHG $QQXDO 3HUIRUPDQFH (YDOXDWLRQ5HSRUW&$3(5
WKHILQDOGUDIWGRHVQRWDSSHDUWRKDYHEHHQSRVWHG
RQ WKH &LW\¶V ZHEVLWH
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³5HYLHZ IXQGLQJ RSSRUWXQLWLHV DQQXDOO\ GRZQ
SD\PHQWDVVLVWDQFHSURJUDPLVRQJRLQJ´7KLVODQJXDJHODFNVD FOHDU FRPPLWPHQWWRDFKLHYH WKHVWDWHG4XDQWLILHG2EMHFWLYHVDQGVLPLODUQRQFRPPLWWDOODQJXDJHLVXVHGWKURXJKRXW Ɣ *RDO +(,QFUHDVH +RXVLQJ 3URGXFWLRQ DQG(QVXUH$GHTXDWH /DQG IRU$OO+RXVLQJ 7\SHVDQG,QFRPH/HYHOV
ż 5HFHQW FKDQJHV WR VWDWH ODZ KDYH VSXUUHG DQ LQFUHDVH RI $FFHVVRU\ 'ZHOOLQJ 8QLWVDFURVVWKHVWDWH DVDUHVSRQVH WR QDWXUDO GLVDVWHUV DQG KRPHOHVVQHVV 7KH &RDOLWLRQ LV SOHDVHG WR VHH WKH &LW\ LV FRQWLQXLQJ LWV HIIRUWV WR LQFUHDVH $'8V DFURVVWKH &LW\ ZLWKIRFXV RQ KLJK RSSRUWXQLW\ QHLJKERUKRRGV *LYHQWKH &LW\¶V TXDQWLILHGREMHFWLYHRI$'8V
XQLWVLQWKHORZLQFRPH FDWHJRU\ LQ 7DEOH
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element
,W G
FH I
WG
3UR
DVV
1 2
1384
Summary of Comments on A9g2imqt_18ssekm_380.tmp
Page: 2
Number: 1 Author: Matt Diaz Date: 5/31/2023 3:12:00 PM
The CAPER is on the Economic Development Departments' website at Economic Development Department - City of Stockton (stocktonca.gov) .
Staff will continue to explore potential impediments to the CAPER's achievements and successes.
Number: 2 Author: Matt Diaz Date: 5/31/2023 1:52:00 PM
City staff has been tasked with following up on various complex housing solutions to address everything from staffing shortages, rent control, balancing the need to enhance housing development without leading to increased costs, and so on. While staff agrees that having specific milestones for all objectives would be helpful, the progress of some of the efforts will be dictated by the process in which they are explored and the direction giving to staff as progress is made.
1385
+(
WKH&RDOLWLRQZRXOGOLNH WR VHH WKH &LW\ H[SORUHDSLORW SURJUDP VLPLODU WR
/$ &RXQW\
WKDW ZRXOG HQVXUH QHZO\ FRQVWUXFWHG
RU FRQYHUWHG
$'8V DUH
DIIRUGDEOH WR LQGLYLGXDOV RU KRXVHKROGV LQ ORZLQFRPH FDWHJRULHV E\ SURYLGLQJ LQFHQWLYHV WR KRPHRZQHUV
VXFK DV IRUJLYDEOH ORDQV RU JUDQW DVVLVWDQFH IRU
FRQVWUXFWLRQ
Ɣ *RDO +(3URYLGH +LJK 4XDOLW\ +RXVLQJ IRU$OO,QFRPH *URXSV ż $OO VWDWHGSURJUDPVZLWKLQ*RDOZLWKWKHH[FHSWLRQRI3URJUDPDSSHDUWR RQO\ PDLQWDLQ WKH H[LVWLQJ VWDWXV TXR ,I H[LVWLQJ SURJUDPVDUHQRW PHHWLQJ FXUUHQW KRXVLQJ QHHGV LW LV XQFOHDU KRZ WKLV VHFWLRQ ZLOO LPSURYH XSRQ H[LVWLQJ RXWFRPHV
Ɣ *RDO +(3UHVHUYH([LVWLQJ +RXVLQJ
ż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
DQG723$
SROLF\
ż ,W LV ZHOO GRFXPHQWHG WKDW D PDMRULW\ RI ORZLQFRPH KRXVHKROGV GR QRW KDYH DFFHVVWRGHHGUHVWULFWHGDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJ7KH&RDOLWLRQZRXOGOLNH WR VHH WKH &LW\ HVWDEOLVK D IRUPDO VPDOO VLWH SUHVHUYDWLRQ SURJUDP WKDW ZRXOG VXSSRUW PLVVLRQGULYHQ QRQSURILW GHYHORSHUV LQ DFTXLULQJ H[LVWLQJ QRQGHHG UHVWULFWHG XQLWVDQGEULQJLQJWKHVHXQLWVLQWRWKH&LW\¶VIRUPDODIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJVWRFN ż &KDOOHQJHV ZLWK WKH &LW\¶V H[LVWLQJ &RGH (QIRUFHPHQW PRGHO KDYH ORQJ EHHQ XSOLIWHGE\WKHFRPPXQLW\DVIDLOLQJWRPHHWWKHQHHGVRIUHVLGHQWV7KHUHKDYH EHHQ UHSHDWHG VXJJHVWLRQV WKDW WKH &LW\ DGRSW D PRUH SURDFWLYH IRUP RI FRGH HQIRUFHPHQWDQG UHQWDOLQVSHFWLRQSURFHVV3URJUDPSURSRVHVQRVLJQLILFDQW FKDQJHVWRWKHH[LVWLQJFRGHHQIRUFHPHQWUHQWDOLQVSHFWLRQPRGHODQG RIIHUVQR PHDQLQJIXOWLPHOLQHIRUDVVHVVPHQWRUXSGDWHV
Ɣ *RDO +(3URYLGH (TXLWDEOH +RXVLQJ DQG 6XSSRUWLYH 6HUYLFHV ż 7KH&RDOLWLRQEHOLHYHVWKHSROLFLHVDQGSURJUDPVQRWHGXQGHU*RDO+( FRXOG EH VLJQLILFDQWO\ VWUHQJWKHQHG (TXLWDEOH KRXVLQJ SROLFLHV VKRXOG DGGUHVV WKH HQWLUH FRQWLQXXP RI KRXVLQJ QHHG LQFOXGLQJ SURWHFWLQJ WHQDQWV $SSUR[LPDWHO\ Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element
XOG
$S
OG
$OO
RQO\
$OO V
7KLV
XQLW\
7KL
1 2
3 1386
Page: 3
Number: 1 Author: Matt Diaz Date: 5/31/2023 1:58:00 PM
Chapter 7 Evaluation includes a detailed description of how the goal/policies were either carried over, amended, or removed. While high-quality housing remains a constant, the programs were consolidated with others to provide more clarity and are intended to work with other programs for policy implementation.
Number: 2 Author: Matt Diaz Date: 5/31/2023 1:59:00 PM
Staff will continue to explore this program and discuss findings with the Justice Coalition.
Number: 3 Author: Matt Diaz Date: 5/31/2023 1:52:00 PM
Financial options will be explored in the Housing Action Plan, while the Development Code will include amendments to ADU and JADU standards as well. 1387
KDOI RI 6WRFNWRQ¶V SRSXODWLRQ
SHUFHQW
LV FRPSULVHG RI UHQWHU KRXVHKROGV
DQG D VLJQLILFDQW QXPEHU RI UHQWHUV GZHOO LQ VLQJOHIDPLO\ KRPHV ZKLFK DUH H[HPSW IURP DQ\ SURWHFWLYH PHDVXUHV LQ$% 7KH &RDOLWLRQ ZRXOG OLNH WR VHH PRUH H[SOLFLW SROLFLHV VXUURXQGLQJ UHQWHU SURWHFWLRQV VXFK DV H[WHQGLQJ MXVWFDXVH HYLFWLRQ SROLFLHV WR VLQJOHIDPLO\ UHQWDO XQLWV DFWXDO HQIRUFHPHQW RI SUHYHQWLQJ VRXUFHRILQFRPHGLVFULPLQDWLRQDQGWHQDQWDQWLKDUDVVPHQWSROLFLHV 6,7(,19(1725<
&DO(QYLUR6FUHHQLVDVFUHHQLQJPHWKRGRORJ\WKDWFDQEHXVHGWRKHOSLGHQWLI\&DOLIRUQLD FRPPXQLWLHVWKDWDUHGLVSURSRUWLRQDWHO\EXUGHQHGE\PXOWLSOHVRXUFHVRISROOXWLRQ,WDOVRWDNHV LQWRDFFRXQWKRXVLQJEXUGHQSRSXODWLRQFKDUDFWHULVWLFVHGXFDWLRQSRYHUW\HWF0RVWRI 6WRFNWRQ¶V5+1$VLWHVDSSHDUWREHORFDWHGVRXWKRI+DUGLQJ:D\ZLWKLQQHLJKERUKRRGVWKDW
KDYH WKH KLJKHVW SHUFHQWLOH RI EXUGHQ
DQG DERYH DV VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH
DQG DUH
FDWHJRUL]HGDV/RZ5HVRXUFH´DQGRU³+LJK6HJUHJDWLRQ 3RYHUW\´ )LJXUH+(
7&$&+&'
2SSRUWXQLW\$UHDV
DUHDV
2Q$SULO +RXVLQJ -XVWLFH &RDOLWLRQ PHPEHUV FRQGXFWHGDVLWH WRXU RI SURSRVHG6LWH ,QYHQWRU\ORFDWLRQV2XUREVHUYDWLRQVDUHQRWHGLQWKHIROORZLQJFRPPHQWV
Ɣ 0XOWLSOHVLWHVDUHOLVWHG DV EHLQJ OHVV WKDQDKDOIDFUHLQ VL]H 'XH WR HFRQRPLHV RI VFDOH LWLVKLJKO\XQOLNHO\WKDWORZLQFRPH DIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJZRXOGEH FRQVWUXFWHGRQWKHVH SDUFHOV7KH&RDOLWLRQ UHFRPPHQGVWKDWWKH&LW\ UHPRYH VXFK VLWHVIURPWKHLQYHQWRU\ GXHWRWKHPEHLQJLQIHDVLEOHIRUUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQW Ɣ 7KH&RDOLWLRQXUJHV WKH &LW\ RI 6WRFNWRQ WR FRQVLGHU HQYLURQPHQWDO DQG KHDOWK LPSDFWV RI SURSRVHG LQYHQWRU\ ORFDWLRQV )RU H[DPSOH VLWHV DGMDFHQW WR IUHHZD\ DQG IUHLJKW FRUULGRUVPD\EHXQVXLWDEOHIRU KRXVLQJ GHYHORSPHQW GXH WR SROOXWLRQ FRQFHUQV HJ VLWH
ORFDWLRQV
ż $31
&KXUFK6W
Ŷ :KLOHWKHUHDUHQRPDMRUVWUXFWXUHV RQ HLWKHU RI WKHVH SDUFHOV DW WKH WLPH RIWKH&RDOLWLRQ¶VVLWHWRXULWDSSHDUHGWKDW *UHLI 5HF\FOLQJ ZDV RSHUDWLQJ RQWKLVSDUFHODQGSRVVLEO\WKHDGMDFHQWRQH$GGLWLRQDOO\ DOWKRXJKWKHVH SDUFHOVDUH]RQHGIRU0HGLXP'HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO
50 WKH VXUURXQGLQJ
DUHDKDVDKLJKFRQFHQWUDWLRQRILQGXVWULDOEXVLQHVVHV ż 0$17+(< 5' 672&.721 &$
Ŷ 7KLVSDUFHODQGLWVDGMDFHQWRQHVDUHLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WRWKHIUHHZD\ ,I SODQQHGGHYHORSPHQWLVFRQVLGHUHGWKH &RDOLWLRQ UHFRPPHQGV DGGLWLRQDO PLWLJDWLRQHIIRUWVWRRIIVHWWKHLPSDFWVRILWVSUR[LPLW\WRWKHIUHHZD\ ż 667$1,6/$8667672&.721 &$
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element
7KH
V VX
0XO
LW LV
0X
$31
1 2
3 1388
Page: 4
Number: 1 Author: Guest User Date: 5/25/2023 1:56:00 PM Revisions have been made to Program 28 in the Policy Document to address this comment• Number: 2 Author: Guest User Date: 5/25/2023 1:21:00 PM None of the sites to address the lower income RHNA are less than a half-acre in size. The part of state law concerned with sites smaller than a half-acre is specific to sites that list units to address the lower-income part of the RHNA. Sites smaller than a half-acre are only included to address the moderate and above-moderate part of the RHNA••
Number: 3 Author: Guest User Date: 5/25/2023 1:21:00 PM This site is being removed from the Draft Housing Element• 1389
Ŷ 7KLVSDUFHODQGLWVDGMDFHQWRQHVDUHLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WR WKHIUHHZD\ ,I SODQQHGGHYHORSPHQWLVFRQVLGHUHGWKH &RDOLWLRQ UHFRPPHQGV DGGLWLRQDO PLWLJDWLRQHIIRUWVWRRIIVHWWKHLPSDFWVRILWVSUR[LPLW\WRWKHIUHHZD\ ż (+$=(/721$9(672&.721 &$
Ŷ 7KLV SDUFHO LV ORFDWHG LQ D *HQHUDO &RPPHUFLDO ]RQHG DUHD DQG LV FXUUHQWO\EHLQJXVHGDVDVHPLWUXFNSDUNLQJDQGRURYHUIORZORW
$IILUPDWLYHO\ )XUWKHULQJ )DLU +RXVLQJ
$FFRUGLQJWR$%
$IILUPDWLYHO\ )XUWKHULQJ )DLU +RXVLQJ
$))+
6WRFNWRQ LV UHTXLUHG E\ 6WDWH
ODZWR XVH DOO DYDLODEOH GDWD DQG ³ORFDO NQRZOHGJH´VXFK DVWKH UHFHQWWHVWLPRQ\ RI UHVLGHQWV DQG FRPPXQLW\ RUJDQL]DWLRQV WR FRQGXFW DQ LQGHSWK DQDO\VLV RI WKH IDLU KRXVLQJ LVVXHV LPSDFWLQJPHPEHUVRISURWHFWHG FODVVHV7KH'UDIW FRUUHFWO\GHPRQVWUDWHVWKDW UHVLGHQWVZKR DUH PHPEHUV RI SURWHFWHG FODVVHV ± LQ SDUWLFXODU SHRSOH RI FRORU ± DUH XQIDLUO\ DQG GLVSURSRUWLRQDWHO\ KDUPHG E\ KRXVLQJ FRVWV HYLFWLRQ RYHUFURZGLQJ DQG GLVSODFHPHQW +RZHYHUWKHSURSRVHG JRDOV SROLFLHV DQG SURJUDPV GR QRW H[SOLFLWO\ DGGUHVV IHHGEDFN RU LGHDV JDWKHUHGIURPVWDNHKROGHUVLQFOXGLQJLQWHUYHQWLRQVVXFKDV
Ɣ (YLFWLRQ SURWHFWLRQ SURJUDPV
Ɣ 5LJKW WR FRXQVHOOHJDO DLG VXSSRUW IRU UHQWHU KRXVHKROGV Ɣ 'HFRQFHQWUDWLQJ SRYHUW\ LQ WKH 'RZQWRZQ DQG 6RXWK 6WRFNWRQ QHLJKERUKRRGV $GGLWLRQDOO\ RWKHU JRDOV RI $% DUH WR ³UHSODFH VHJUHJDWHG OLYLQJ SDWWHUQV ZLWK WUXO\ LQWHJUDWHGDQGEDODQFHGOLYLQJSDWWHUQV DQG WUDQVIRUP UDFLDOO\ DQG HWKQLFDOO\ FRQFHQWUDWHG DUHDV RI SRYHUW\ LQWR DUHDV RI RSSRUWXQLW\´ +RZHYHU )LJXUH +( 7&$&+&' 2SSRUWXQLW\ $UHDV
VKRZVDVLJQLILFDQWQXPEHURIVLWHVLQ³/RZ5HVRXUFH´DQGRU³+LJK6HJUHJDWLRQ SRYHUW\´DV ZHOO DV PXOWLSOH ³3LSHOLQH 3URMHFWV´ LQ DUHDV RI +LJK2SSRUWXQLW\DVGHILQHGE\+&'EXWGRHV QRWLQGLFDWHZKHWKHUWKHVHXQLWVZLOOEHDIIRUGDEOHWRVSHFLILFLQFRPHOHYHOV 8OWLPDWHO\WKH&RDOLWLRQIHHOVWKDWWKHFXUUHQWGUDIWHOHPHQWPDNHVWKHEHORZOLVWHG ³PLVWDNHV´ LGHQWLILHGE\+&'WRYDU\LQJGHJUHHV
Ɣ $KLJKTXDOLW\ $VVHVVPHQW RI )DLU +RXVLQJ EXW VWDWXVTXR DFWLRQVSURJUDPV Ɣ 'RHV QRW LQFOXGH UHJLRQDO FRPSDULVRQ LQ DQDO\VHV
Ɣ 'RHV QRW DVN WKH SXEOLF WR SURYLGH LQSXW RQ $))+
Ɣ 'RHVQ¶W SULRULWL]HFRQWULEXWLQJ IDFWRUV FRQQHFW WR SURJUDPV Ɣ +LJK UHVRXUFH DUHDV FDQ¶WUHO\RQ $'8V DORQH
Ɣ 1R GDWD GXPSLQJ 7HOO WKH VWRU\
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element
DV
HV
D
'RH
'RH
'R
'RH
+LJK
'R
1 2
3 4
1390
Page: 5
Number: 1 Author: Guest User Date: 5/25/2023 1:21:00 PM This site is being removed from the Draft Housing Element• Number: 2 Author: Guest User Date: 5/25/2023 1:23:00 PM The units and what income levels they are affordable to for the Pipeline Projects are shown in Table HE-54• Number: 3 Author: Guest User Date: 5/25/2023 1:23:00 PM The Assessment of Fair Housing does include a regional comparison in the analysis• Number: 4 Author: Guest User Date: 5/25/2023 1:23:00 PM Contributing factors have been prioritized and connected to actions in the Policy Document. See Table HE-50 and the text above that table.• 1391
2XWUHDFK DQG (QJDJHPHQW
7KH &LW\ PXVW UHDFK$//HFRQRPLF VHJPHQWV RI WKH SRSXODWLRQ GHVFULEH PHDQLQJIXO IUHTXHQW
DQGRQJRLQJFRPPXQLW\SDUWLFLSDWLRQFRQVXOWDWLRQDQGFRRUGLQDWLRQWKDWLVLQWHJUDWHGZLWKWKH EURDGHUVWDNHKROGHURXWUHDFKDQGFRPPXQLW\SDUWLFLSDWLRQSURFHVVIRUWKHRYHUDOOKRXVLQJ HOHPHQW
:KLOH VHYHUDOPHHWLQJV ZHUH KRVWHG E\WKH &LW\ &RPPXQLW\ 'HYHORSPHQW 'HSDUWPHQWWKHVH PHHWLQJVGLGQRWUHDFKVLJQLILFDQW SRUWLRQV RI WKH &LW\ SRSXODWLRQ QDPHO\ UHQWHUV
ZKR PDNH XS
DSSUR[LPDWHO\KDOIRIDOO6WRFNWRQKRXVHKROGV
DQGSHRSOHDWULVNIRU RU ZKRDUHKRPHOHVV 7KH
&LW\¶VPHWKRGRIFRPPXQLFDWLRQZLWKWKHSXEOLFZDVSULPDULO\E\RQOLQHQRWLFHVRQLWVRZQZHE VLWH+RZHYHUPRVWZRUNLQJFODVVSHRSOHOLYLQJLQWKH&LW\ ZLOO QRW YLVLW WKH &LW\¶V ZHEVLWH WR ILQG RXWDERXWWKH+RXVLQJ(OHPHQWEHFDXVHPRVWUHVLGHQWVDUHQ¶WDZDUHLWH[LVWV$OVRSHUFHQW RI 6WRFNWRQ UHVLGHQWV ODFN LQWHUQHW DFFHVV ZKLFK SRVHV DQ DGGLWLRQDO FKDOOHQJH WR DFFHVVLQJ RQOLQHPDWHULDOV
$OOVHJPHQWVRIWKHFRPPXQLW\ZHUHHQFRXUDJHGE\WKH&LW\WRSDUWLFLSDWH LQ SUHSDUDWLRQ RI WKH +RXVLQJ(OHPHQWWKURXJKDVHULHVRIHIIRUWV LQFOXGLQJ QRWLFLQJ RI SURSHUW\ RZQHUV RI VLWHV LQ WKH GUDIW +RXVLQJ (OHPHQW VLWHV LQYHQWRU\ DQQRXQFHPHQWV RQ WKH &LW\¶V VRFLDO PHGLD FKDQQHOV GLVWULEXWLRQWRWKH+RXVLQJ(OHPHQWHPDLOOLVWVHUYDQGGLUHFWFRQWDFWVE\HPDLODQGSKRQHZLWK RUJDQL]DWLRQVVHUYLQJORZLQFRPHDQGVSHFLDOQHHGVJURXSV 7KH &LW\ LQYLWHG UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV RI WKHVHJURXSVWRDWWHQGWKHSXEOLFZRUNVKRSVRQWKH+RXVLQJ(OHPHQW ,WVKRXOGEHQRWHGWKDWUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVZKRVHUYHPHPEHUV RI WKH FRPPXQLW\DUHQRW WKH VDPH DV FRPPXQLW\ PHPEHUV WKHPVHOYHV 6HFRQG QRWLFLQJ SURSHUW\ RZQHUV DQG QR RQH HOVH LH WKRVH ZKR UHQW DQG WKRVH ZKR DUH XQKRXVHG LJQRUHV H[WHQVLYH HFRQRPLF VHJPHQWV RI WKH FRPPXQLW\7KHUHDUHQRH[DPSOHV RI WKH &LW\ UHDFKLQJ RXW WR WKH 6SDQLVKVSHDNLQJ FRPPXQLW\ LQDZD\WKDW LV PHDQLQJIXO$VVXFK WKH &RDOLWLRQ GRHV QRW EHOLHYH WKH &LW\ RI 6WRFNWRQ KDV PHW LWVRXWUHDFKREOLJDWLRQVXQGHU$%
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQV
%DVHGRQWKHDERYHGLVFXVVLRQWKH6WRFNWRQ+RXVLQJ-XVWLFH&RDOLWLRQZRXOGOLNHWRPDNH WKH IROORZLQJUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVWRKHOSVWUHQJWKHQWKH'UDIW WK &\FOH +RXVLQJ (OHPHQW DQG HQVXUH LWVUHVSRQVLYHQHVVWRORFDOKRXVLQJQHHG
Ɣ 3ROLF\ 'RFXPHQW
ż $GGPRUHVSHFLILFLW\WR4XDQWLILDEOH2EMHFWLYHVDQG7LPHOLQHODQJXDJH WR HQVXUH UHDOLVWLF DQG PHDQLQJIXO RXWFRPHV RQDWLPHOLQH WKDW HQVXUHV VRPH DFFRXQWDELOLW\ ż %URDGHQ *RDO +( WR LQFOXGH H[SOLFLW UHIHUHQFH DQG UHFRPPHQGDWLRQ WR 5HVLGHQW 3URWHFWLRQ SROLFLHV WR HQVXUH KRXVLQJ QHLJKERUKRRG VWDELOLW\ DQG DIILUPDWLYHGLVSODFHPHQWPLWLJDWLRQIRU6WRFNWRQLDQV
Exhibit 1- 2023-2031 Housing Element
$OVR
JH
$OV
7KH
W LV
1 2
1392
Page: 6
Number: 1 Author: Matt Diaz Date: 5/31/2023 3:09:00 PM
The City has been dispersing flyers in multiple languages at libraries, businesses, and stakeholder groups, but we can work to expand this to other areas that need them.
Number: 2 Author: Matt Diaz Date: 5/31/2023 3:07:00 PM
All shape stockton notices were in five languages, while all housing and zoning workshops were noticed in Spanish and english. These notices can be found on the City's shape stockton website.
1393
ż ,QFUHDVHG FROODERUDWLRQ ZLWK WKH 7UDQVIRUPDWLYH &OLPDWH &RPPXQLWLHV SURJUDPV DQG SDUWQHUV WR SURYLGH SURIHVVLRQDO VHUYLFHV UHURRIVHOHFWULFDO
XSJUDGHV
WRORZLQFRPHKRXVHKROGKRXVLQJVWRFN
Ɣ 6LWH,QYHQWRU\
ż 5HPRYH DQ\ H[LVWLQJ LQYHQWRU\ VLWHVWKDW VLWZLWKLQ IHHWRIIUHHZD\WR DYRLG GLVSURSRUWLRQDWHO\ QHJDWLYH KHDOWK DQG HQYLURQPHQWDO LPSDFWV RQ ORZLQFRPH