Agenda packet — City Council and Concurrent Authorities, September 23, 2025 (part 4 of 5)

May 2, 2025
Wes Johnson
City of Stockton Public Works
22 E. Weber Avenue Room 301
Stockton, CA 95202
Sent via email
Subject: Stockton Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Gap Closure Amendment #3: Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue Redesign, Project Phasing, and Additional Submittal
Dear Mr. Johnson,
During recent discussions regarding the subject project, the City has requested design revisions to address grading and drainage issues related to the proposed sidewalks along Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue. Additionally, we have been asked to provide an additional submittal of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates to split the project into two separate phases. To accommodate these changes, we have prepared this proposed contract amendment detailing the necessary adjustments to the scope, budget, and schedule to accommodate the condensed schedule. This proposal aims to keep the project on schedule and align with the City's updated expectations.

Executive Summary
The value of the additional services included in this amendment totals $490,802. In an effort to partner with the City and mitigate the financial impact of these changes, we will be writing off $80,056 to bring our amendment request down to $410,746.

Current Tasks (Work Completed)
This section discusses the expansion of scope that we have identified for work performed up to the phase 1 bid documents.

Task 4.4: Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E)
Project Phasing
As discussed during our meeting on December 19, 2024, the City wants to split the project into two phases. Originally, the second phase was for work on Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue, exclusive of the Poplar Street-Filbert Street intersection. The first phase was for the remainder of the work on Fillmore site and all work on the other four sites. At the request of the City, R.E.Y. studied the feasibility of phasing the work on the Fillmore site and provided markups on the plans showing a constructible phasing scheme along with an updated cost estimate that splits the costs by phase. Since then, the phasing direction was revised to show all of the Fillmore site work on Phase 2, with the other four sites remaining in Phase 1.

EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 897

Page 2 of 5 ends

Additional work required for modifying the plans to show only Phase 1 work includes removing the Fillmore sheets from the Phase 1 set, modifying the title sheet, modifying the cost estimates for Phase 1 work, and modifying the specifications and bid sheet to show only Phase 1 work.

The additional budget requested for splitting the project into two phases is $19,544.

Additional Submittal
Our originally negotiated scope of work for this project includes the submittal of three (3) packages of plans, specifications, and estimates at the 65% level, 100% level, and final submittal. The 65% PS&Es were submitted on 10/11/2024, and the 100% PS&Es were submitted on 11/15/2024.

On 2/5/2025, we were directed by the City to prepare an additional submittal, to be submitted on 3/12/2025. This submittal will be used to obtain construction funding from the California Transportation Commission (CTC). We were also given the expectation that the first round of City comments on our PS&E package will arrive at or around the time of the submittal of the CTC set and final package of PS&Es will be due in April 2025.

The budget requested for the additional submittal of PS&Es is $49,700.

Summary
Current Tasks (Work Completed) Amount

4.4 Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) $69,244 Project Phasing $19,544
Additional Submittal $49,700
New Tasks (Upcoming Work)

4.11: Ph 2 PS&Es (Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue Pavement Replacement) Also in our December 19, 2024 meeting, the City stated that they are looking at design changes at Poplar Street that would change the grading and drainage patterns for the roadway. Instead of continuing the existing drainage patterns with roadside ditches between driveways to collect storm water, the geometric section of Poplar Street will change so that a rolled curb and gutter along the north side of the street collects storm water from both the road and private properties on the north side. To accomplish this, the entire surface of the asphalt pavement would need to be lowered, resulting in the replacement of the asphalt pavement section of Poplar Street. In addition, a 5-foot wide acquisition of Right-of-Way was requested for one of the properties along the south side of Poplar Street to allow for a consistent roadway width along the entire street.

At the City’s request, R.E.Y. has already developed a typical section of the pavement replacement on Poplar Street to confirm the constructability of the new design. R.E.Y. also developed a conceptual cost estimate that includes the additional costs of the pavement replacement work when compared to the design presented on our 100% plans.

The City also requested that Golden Gate Avenue have its pavement replaced at a lower elevation, similar to the design proposed at Poplar Street. This will require the acquisition of a 5-foot wide strip of EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 898

Page 3 of 5 ends

Right-of-Way from two properties on the west side of Golden Gate Avenue, to allow the construction of a new sidewalk along the west side of the street.

Additional work anticipated for the reconstruction of Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue includes the redesign of Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue as described above, revised sheets to show plans and profiles of Poplar Street Golden Gate Avenue with the street centerline profile, updated demolition plans, new typical cross-sections, new storm drain profiles, updated staging and erosion control plans, submittals of PS&Es at the 65% and 100% levels for City review and a bid set for construction. An additional round of utility coordination for Phase 2 will also be required, including A-B-C letters and LAPM support.

We anticipate that PS&E development will occur in the years 2025 through 2026.

The additional budget requested for the reconstruction of Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue is $179,788.

4.12: Ph 1 Utility Location and Potholing
We intend to invite a subconsultant to perform utility location and potholing services over selected utility mains within Buena Vista Avenue near Monte Diablo Avenue, and at the intersection of Pilgrim Street and Channel Street. Areas of utility location are shown in the attached exhibit. We are including an allowance of up to 10 potholes. We anticipate that a no-fee encroachment permit application will be needed prior to the start of work.

The additional budget requested for Ph 1 Utility Location and Potholing services is $37,518.

4.13: Ph 2 Utility Location and Potholing
We intend to invite a subconsultant to perform utility location services over selected utility mains within Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue, at the areas shown in the attached exhibit. We are including an allowance of up to 10 potholes. We anticipate that a no-fee encroachment permit application will be needed prior to the start of work.

The additional budget requested for Ph 2 Utility Location and Potholing services is $43,920.

4.14: Ph 2 Surveying
R.E.Y. will create three (3) separate Legals and Plats for the Right-of-way (ROW) acquisitions for the Fillmore Elementary School site. These areas are along North Golden Gate Avenue (APN’s 143-09-021 and 143-09-022) and East Poplar Street (APN 143-46-009). These ROW acquisitions areas will be created to fit the current design of the improvement plans and to match the existing ROW surrounding the subject properties.

R.E.Y. will also create four (4) post-construction corner records for four (4) monuments found during the pre-design survey. The current design calls for regrading of the street which may cause the found monuments to be destroyed during construction. Once construction is complete, R.E.Y. will reset the previously found monuments to their originally found position. A subsequent Post-Construction Corner Record will be submitted to the County Surveyor. R.E.Y. will not set any monuments not found during EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 899

Page 4 of 5 ends

the pre-design phase, nor monuments shown on record maps, or monuments for the newly acquired ROW.

R.E.Y. will also use previously established site control along with conventional surveying techniques to locate utility marks. These marks will be completed by a utility location subconsultant, and R.E.Y. will collect the location of the marks once they are fully completed. If depths are marked out as well, R.E.Y. will record this information with the survey data collection. No potholing will be performed in the field, so R.E.Y. cannot confirm the accuracy of the mark-out location. R.E.Y. will compile these field shots in a Civil3D base map to be used for design.

The final deliverables will include one (1) set of Legal Descriptions and accompanying Plats for each of the three (3) sites of ROW acquisitions, one (1) set of Post-Construction Corner Records for each of the previously located and filed Corner Records in the construction area, and a Civil 3D DWG of the located utilities.

The additional budget requested for Ph 2 Surveying services is $15,158.

4.15: Ph 2 Coordination/Meetings
As of now, R.E.Y. has reached our full budgeted amount for the Coordination and Meetings phase. We are proposing 130 hours of additional coordination and meeting time.

The additional budget requested for additional meetings and coordination is $40,558.

4.16: Ph 2 Design Support During Construction
R.E.Y. will perform bid and construction support services for the Phase 2 project. We anticipate that the project will complete construction by the end of year 2030. We are proposing 80 hours of construction support time.

We anticipate that construction of the Phase 2 project will occur in the years 2028 through 2030.

The additional budget requested for Ph 2 Design Support During Construction is $24,560.

Compensation Notes
All upcoming work described in this additional services request will be performed on a Time and Materials Basis and billed per the attached fee schedule. The budget for this amendment includes escalation based on the dates assumed above and the attached schedule. Should the work be performed at a later date than what was assumed, additional budget may be required and a separate contract amendment may be requested.

Exclusions
• Right-of-Way support services, including appraisals and acquisitions • Water quality, low impact development, or hydromodification design elements • Environmental engineering and documentation, and hazardous material testing • Geotechnical Engineering
• Electrical engineering, including photometric analysis • Traffic studies
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 900

Page 5 of 5 ends

• Plan and profiles for utilities that require relocation due to the proposed roadway improvements (i.e. PG&E, California Water Service, or other utilities) • Landscape architecture services
• Structural engineering services (i.e. retaining walls, vaults) • Design of fences, walls, or other site architectural improvements • Record Drawings
• Agency and permitting fees
Summary
For work to date that is outside of our scope of work on the Phase 1 project, R.E.Y. requests additional budget in the amount of $69,244 for expedited project delivery, project phasing, the CTC Submittal, and the survey cost recovery.

For work related the Phase 2 Project, including changes to the design of Poplar Street and Golden Gate Avenue, utility location services, plats and legal descriptions, monument preservation, additional coordination and meeting time, and design support during construction, R.E.Y. requests additional budget in the amount of $341,502.

In total, our additional budget request is in the amount of $410,746, which will bring the new total contract amount to $938,759 (current contract amount is $528,013).

We appreciate the opportunity to continue our work on this project. If you have any questions or require further details, feel free to contact us.

Sincerely,
Alex Heuer, P.E., LEED AP, QSD/QSP
Senior Engineer
Vanessa Humphrey
Associate Vice President
Attachments:
- Amendment 3 Fee Estimate
- Amendment 3 Fee Schedule
- Phase 2 Project Schedule
- Phase 1 Utility Location Scope Exhibit
- Phase 2 Utility Location Scope Exhibit
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 901
Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Gap Closure
City of Stockton
Fee Estimate Amendment 3
May 2, 2025

TASK DESCRIPTION
Assistant Engineer -
III
Associate Engineer -
III
Senior Engineer - I
Senior Engineer - II
Senior Engineer - V
Principal Manager -
II
2-Person
Survey Crew
Assistant Surveyor -
2 Senior Surveyor - 2
Billing Rate $159.00 $191.00 $222.00 $243.00 $307.00 $334.00 $366.00 $149.00 $243.00

4.11 246 200 112 182 26 766 175,288 $ 4,500 $ 179,788 $

4.12 2 8 6 1 8 4 4 33 8,518 $ 29,000 $ 37,518 $

4.13 3 8 6 1 8 4 5 35 8,920 $ 35,000 $ 43,920 $

4.14 3 8 46 18 75 15,158 $ - $ 15,158 $

4.15 106 24 130 40,558 $ - $ 40,558 $

4.16 80 80 24,560 $ - $ 24,560 $
TOTAL HOURS 251 16 200 112 380 55 24 54 27 1,119
TOTAL DOLLARS $39,909 $3,056 $44,400 $27,216 $116,660 $18,370 $8,784 $8,046 $6,561 273,002 $ 68,500 $ 341,502 $ Ph 2 PS&Es (Poplar St and Golden Gate Ave Replacement)
Ph 1 Utility Location and Potholing
Ph 2 Utility Location and Potholing
Ph 2 Surveying
Ph 2 Coordination/Meetings
Ph 2 Design Support During Construction

TOTAL DOLLARS

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL LABOR COST

TOTAL ODC'S
TOTALS R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc.

EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT 1
902
LABOR CLASSIFICATION 2024-2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Assistant Engineer/Surveyor - I $131 $138 $145 $152 $160 $168 Assistant Engineer/Surveyor - II $145 $152 $160 $168 $177 $185 Assistant Engineer/Surveyor - III $159 $167 $175 $184 $193 $203 Assistant Engineer/Surveyor - IV $173 $181 $190 $200 $210 $221 Assistant Engineer/Surveyor - V $187 $196 $206 $216 $227 $238 Associate Engineer/Surveyor - I $164 $173 $181 $190 $200 $210 Associate Engineer/Surveyor - II $177 $186 $195 $205 $215 $226 Associate Engineer/Surveyor - III $191 $200 $210 $221 $232 $244 Associate Engineer/Surveyor - IV $204 $214 $224 $236 $247 $260 Associate Engineer/Surveyor - V $217 $228 $240 $252 $264 $277 Senior Engineer/Surveyor - I $222 $233 $244 $256 $269 $283 Senior Engineer/Surveyor - II $243 $255 $268 $281 $295 $310 Senior Engineer/Surveyor - III $265 $278 $292 $307 $322 $338 Senior Engineer/Surveyor - IV $286 $301 $316 $331 $348 $365 Senior Engineer/Surveyor - V $307 $323 $339 $356 $374 $392 Principal Manager - I $307 $323 $339 $356 $374 $392
Principal Manager - II $334 $351 $368 $387 $406 $426
Technician - I $106 $111 $117 $123 $129 $135
Technician - II $126 $132 $139 $146 $153 $161
Technician - III $146 $154 $161 $169 $178 $187
Senior Technician - I $152 $159 $167 $175 $184 $193
Senior Technician - II $177 $186 $195 $205 $215 $226
Senior Technician - III $201 $211 $222 $233 $245 $257
LiDAR Technician I $166 $175 $183 $193 $202 $212
LiDAR Technician II $193 $203 $213 $223 $234 $246
LiDAR Technician III $219 $230 $242 $254 $267 $280
Senior LiDAR Specialist I $228 $239 $251 $264 $277 $291 Senior LiDAR Specialist II $257 $269 $283 $297 $312 $327 GIS Analyst $168 $176 $185 $194 $204 $214
GIS Manager $189 $198 $208 $219 $230 $241
1-Person Crew $228 $239 $251 $264 $277 $291
2-Person Crew $366 $384 $403 $423 $445 $467
3-Person Crew $488 $512 $538 $564 $593 $622
Project Coordinator $135 $141 $148 $156 $164 $172
Senior Project Coordinator $231 $243 $255 $268 $281 $295 Grant Administrator $231 $243 $255 $268 $281 $295
Expert Witness Testimony/Deposition $501 $526 $552 $580 $609 $639

EXPENSE CLASSIFICATION
Terrestrial LiDAR Scanning Equipment (per hour, 2-hour minimum) $174 $183 $192 $201 $211 $222 Mobile LiDAR Equipment (per hour) $750 $788 $827 $868 $912 $957 UAV LiDAR Equipment (per flight day) $880 $924 $970 $1,019 $1,070 $1,123 Bathymetric Survey Equipment (per flight) $1,125 $1,181 $1,240 $1,302 $1,367 $1,436 Special Monument & Iron Stakes Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Outside Reproductions & Services Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Subconsultants Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% Cost + 15% In-House Large Format Prints (B&W) $0.50/SF $0.50/SF $0.50/SF $0.50/SF $0.50/SF $0.50/SF In-House Large Format Prints (Color) $1.00/SF $1.00/SF $1.00/SF $1.00/SF $1.00/SF $1.00/SF LEGEND
• Rates above are the hourly rate to be charged for each classification unless otherwise noted.

NOTES
• Rates are valid through 12/31/2030.
• Reimbursement for mileage is included in the rates above. • Rate for overtime for field and non‐exempt employees will be charged at 135% of rate listed above. • Rate for double time for field and non‐exempt employees will be charged at 170% of rate listed above. • Field rates for night shift work will be charged at 112.5% of the rates listed above. • Field crew rates for underground work will be charged at an additional $5/hr of the rates listed above.

STOCKTON SRTS SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE PHASE 2 FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 903
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Phase 2 Kickoff 1 day Mon 6/9/25 Mon 6/9/25
2 Utility A Letters 14 days Tue 6/10/25 Fri 6/27/25 1
3 Utility location 4 wks Mon 6/30/25 Fri 7/25/25 2
4 65% PS&Es 49 days Tue 6/10/25 Fri 8/15/25 1
5 City review of 65% Submittal 4 wks Mon 8/18/25 Fri 9/12/25 4 6 Utility B Letters 15 days Mon 8/18/25 Fri 9/5/25 4
7 Plats and Legal Descriptions 20 days Mon 9/15/25 Fri 10/10/25 5 8 100% PS&Es 65 days Mon 9/15/25 Fri 12/12/25 5
9 City review of 100% Submittal 5 wks Mon 12/15/25Fri 1/16/26 8 10 CTC Review 6 wks Mon 12/15/25Fri 1/23/26 8
11 CTC Meeting 2 days Thu 1/29/26 Fri 1/30/26
12 Bid Set Package 35 days Mon 2/2/26 Fri 3/20/26 11
13 Utility C Letters 15 days Mon 3/23/26 Fri 4/10/26 12 14 Procure Funds 500 days Mon 3/23/26 Fri 2/18/28 12
15 Advertise/Bid 3 mons Mon 2/21/28 Fri 5/12/28 14
16 Construction Period 500 days Mon 5/15/28 Fri 4/12/30 15 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
R.E.Y. Engineers
Stockton SRTS Sidewalk Gap Closure Project
Phase 2 Schedule

Page 1 ends

Project: Phase 2 Schedule
Date: Fri 4/11/25

EXHBIIT A
EXHIBIT 1
904
58 59 50 50 59+30.00
98 99 1001
0 50 50 50
+

T T T T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
GAS GAS AS 98 GAS GAS
GAS
99 GAS GAS GAS GAS GASGAS 100 GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS10
49 50 51
50 50 50 50
78 79 50 50 GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

SCALE IN FEET
0 20'10' 40'
Revision
No. Description Apprvd. By Date By DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA SCALE

DESIGNED BYDRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
RECORD DWGS.

AS SHOWN APPROVED BY:

DATE

CITY ENGINEER
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA DATE SIGNED:

SHEET NO.

OF SHEETS
WT19013
PROJECT NO.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
11/15/2024
XX
100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 11/15/24 AH

SCALE IN FEET
0 20'10' 40'

MONTE DIABLO AVENUE

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
C3.8 AH
LAR
AH

MONTE DIABLO AVE & BUENA VISTA AVE

MONTE DIABLO AVE & SAN JUAN AVE
13 13 13
13 10'
(TYP.)

IMPROVEMENT KEY NOTES
CONSTRUCT ROLL CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF STOCKTONSTD. DWG. R-51 AND R-55CONSTRUCT VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OFSTOCKTON STD. DWG. R-52 AND R-55CONSTRUCT ROLL CURB TO VERTICAL CURB TRANSITION AND SIDEWALK PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-53 AND
R-55
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-65
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG.

R-66; MODIFY BACK OF RAMP CURB PER GRADING PLAN
8-INCH ASPHALT CONCRETE DEEP LIFT. SAWCUTSHALL BE 2.0-FEET FROM LIP OF GUTTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.
6-INCH CONCRETE OVER 4-INCH CLASS II
AGGREGATE BASE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-51 OR R-52 OR R-53 AS APPLICABLE, ANDPER R-55. PROVIDE JOINTS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-50.

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING POWER POLEPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING GUY WIRE AND ANCHORPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLEPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINETPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FENCE

ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER VALVE
ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE YELLOW CROSSWALK STRIPE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113 CONSTRUCT 24" WIDE WHITE ADVANCE LIMIT LINE PER CITYOF STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING WATER VALVE
STRIPING PER CAMUTCD DETAIL NUMBER RELOCATE (E)PED. PUSH BUTTON ASSEMBLY; SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN

ROADSIDE SIGN PER CAMUTCD SIGN DESIGNATION
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG.

R-65; MODIFY BACK OF RAMP CURB PER GRADING PLAN

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGNPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STREET LIGHT BOXPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING BOLLARD CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-64

ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING STREET LIGHT
3 4
5 1012
19 20
21 232526
13 14
2229
30 #
11 18
32 242728
9 31
3334
CONSTRUCT SPECIAL CURB RAMP 2, SEE DETAIL 2, SHEETC1.2
CONSTRUCT SPECIAL CURB RAMP 3, SEE DETAIL 3, SHEETC1.2
35 RELOCATE (E.) STREET SIGN36 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-6737 PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING DRAIN INLET (E)FOC (TYP.)
(E)EP (TYP.)
(E)BOW (TYP.)
R/W (TYP.)
1 2
18 19
18 38 CONSTRUCT TYPE B CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS STD. DWG A88A 38 12
9 1 2
35 39 RELOCATE EXISTING UTILITY POLE
39 18
29 19
19 40 EXISTING CLEANOUT ADJUST TO GRADE
40 PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING MINOR CONCRETE 17

VICTORY SCHOOL SITE
UTILITY CROSSING(E) ATT UNDERGROUND(N) 12" STORM DRAIN UTILITY CROSSING (E) PGE GAS(N) 12" STORMDRAIN
50 T
GAS GA
1 2

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 905
58 59 50 50 59+30.00
98 99 1001
0 50 50 50
+

T T T T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
GAS GAS AS 98 GAS GAS
GAS
99 GAS GAS GAS GAS GASGAS 100 GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS10
49 50 51
50 50 50 50
78 79 50 50 GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

SCALE IN FEET
0 20'10' 40'
Revision
No. Description Apprvd. By Date By DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA SCALE

DESIGNED BYDRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
RECORD DWGS.

AS SHOWN APPROVED BY:

DATE

CITY ENGINEER
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA DATE SIGNED:

SHEET NO.

OF SHEETS
WT19013
PROJECT NO.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
11/15/2024
XX
100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 11/15/24 AH

SCALE IN FEET
0 20'10' 40'

MONTE DIABLO AVENUE

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
C3.8 AH
LAR
AH

MONTE DIABLO AVE & BUENA VISTA AVE

MONTE DIABLO AVE & SAN JUAN AVE
13 13 13
13 10'
(TYP.)

DWG. R-65
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG.

DWG. R-51 OR R-52 OR R-53 AS APPLICABLE, ANDPER R-55. PROVIDE JOINTS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-50.

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING WATER VALVE
STRIPING PER CAMUTCD DETAIL NUMBER RELOCATE (E)PED. PUSH BUTTON ASSEMBLY; SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN

ROADSIDE SIGN PER CAMUTCD SIGN DESIGNATION
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG.

R-65; MODIFY BACK OF RAMP CURB PER GRADING PLAN

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGNPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STREET LIGHT BOXPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING BOLLARD CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-64

VICTORY SCHOOL SITE
UTILITY CROSSING(E) ATT UNDERGROUND(N) 12" STORM DRAIN UTILITY CROSSING (E) PGE GAS(N) 12" STORMDRAIN
50 T
GAS GA
1 2

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 906

E WEBER AVE

JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS T GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

GAS GAS GAS
GASJ

AS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

N PILGRIM ST
23 24 50 50
43 43 50 50
RIM: 17.93
8"(W) INV IN: 12.66
8"(E) INV IN: 12.668"(S) INV IN: 12.56
8"(N) INV OUT: 12.56
RIM: 16.39
RIM: 16.40 RIM: 16.44 RIM: 16.45
8"(NE) INV OUT: 12.79
8"(SW) INV IN: 12.72
8"(E) INV OUT: 12.70
8"(SE) INV IN: 12.898"(W) INV OUT: 12.79
8"(NW) INV OUT: 12.97
22 LF of 8"
SD @ S: 0.0033
13 LF of 8"
SD @ S: 0.0033
40 LF of 8"
SD @ S: 0.0033
22 LF of 8"
SD @ S: 0.0033
10+51.69
EX 6" SS XING
INV: 9.21'
10+35.39

GAS XING
INV: 15.80' 10+72.92 GAS XING
INV: 15.40'

CHANNEL ST
SD

W W W W
W
W

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

GAS GAS GA GAS
G
A
S

N PILGRIM ST
D 8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
D 8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD 8"SD 8"SD 8"SD
40 50 50 9 10 11 50 50 50
Revision
No. Description Apprvd. By Date By DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA SCALE

DESIGNED BYDRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
RECORD DWGS.

AS SHOWN APPROVED BY:

DATE

CITY ENGINEER
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA DATE SIGNED:

SHEET NO.

OF SHEETS
WT19013
PROJECT NO.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
11/15/2024
XX
100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 11/15/24 AH

SCALE IN FEET
0 20' 10' 40'

NORTH PILGRIM STREET

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
C4.6 AH
LAR
AH

NORTH PILGRIM STREET & CHANNEL STREET

IMPROVEMENT KEY NOTES NOTES

STRIPING PER CAMUTCD DETAIL NUMBER
# ROADSIDE SIGN PER CAMUTCD SIGN DESIGNATION
12 NORTH PILGRIM STREET & EAST WEBER AVENUE

SCALE IN FEET
0 20'10' 40'
R/W (TYP.)
(E)FOC (TYP.)
(E)EP (TYP.)
(E)BOW (TYP.)
(E)FOW (TYP.)
10+00 10+50 11+00
2010
20 10
6 7
CONSTRUCT SPECIAL CURB RAMP TYPE 3 PER SHEET C1.2CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE YELLOW CROSSWALK STRIPE PERCITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113CONSTRUCT STOP MARKINGS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. NO. R-113 AND CA-MUTCD FIG. 3B-2
10 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER VALVE
CONSTRUCT VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OFSTOCKTON STD. DWG. R-52 AND R-55

CONSTRUCT ROLL CURB TO VERTICAL CURB TRANSITION
AND SIDEWALK PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-53 AND
R-55
18 22
CONSTRUCT 8" DIP CL-350 STORM DRAIN PIPE
20 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE INLET (TYPE 1) WITH STORM DRAIN
MESSAGE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. D-6 AND D-10
CONSTRUCT 12" PVC SDR 35 STORM DRAIN PIPE
19 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE HOLE (TYPE 1) PERCITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. D-5 31 33
24 CONSTRUCT STORM DRAIN MESSAGE PER CITY OFSTOCKTON STD. DWG. D-10 30 25

CONNECT EXISTING ROOF DRAIN TO PROPOSED STORM

DRAIN PIPE
27 26

CONNECT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING

DRAINAGE INLET
28 CONSTRUCT COVER TO EXISTING DRAINAGE INLET
39 RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN
CONSTRUCT 4" PVC SDR 35 STORM DRAIN PIPE

CONSTRUCT CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PER CALTRANS
2022 STANDARD PLAN A24F
CONSTRUCT YIELD LINES PER CALTRANS 2022 STANDARD
PLAN A24G
48 50
8-INCH ASPHALT CONCRETE DEEP LIFT. SAWCUTSHALL BE 2.0-FEET FROM LIP OF GUTTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.
6-INCH CONCRETE OVER 4-INCH CLASS II
AGGREGATE BASE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-51 OR R-52 OR R-53 AS APPLICABLE, ANDPER R-55. PROVIDE JOINTS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-50.

1.5" MIN. GRIND EX AC AND 1.5" AC OVERLAY, OR
AS NOTED ON GRADING DETAIL (SEE SHEET XX) 4
CONSTRUCT SPECIAL CURB RAMP TYPE 1 PER SHEET C1.2
CONSTRUCT SPECIAL CURB RAMP TYPE 2 PER SHEET C1.2
89 2
1 4
9 1
4 2
9 1 4
1 4
2 9
2 8
18 19
18 19
20 22
20 22
24 24
25 26
25 26
2526
25 26
2526
2526
25 26
25 26
27 28
27 28
27 27 27
27 31
33 39
39 48
48 48
50 2
1 4
10 22
20 10 2
1 4
7 6
7 6
7 6
7 7
7 30 7
6 7
6 6
27 31
25 33
26 39
30 (2)(E)WATER VALVES(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
(E)WATER VALVE(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE

JANE FREDERICK SCHOOL SITE
(2) UTILITY CROSSINGS(E) PGE GAS(N) 8" STORM DRAIN
UTILITY CROSSING(E) CAL WATER(N) 8" STORM DRAIN
UTILITYCROSSING(E) PGE GAS(N) 8" STORMDRAIN
UTILITY CROSSING(E) PGE GAS(N) 8" STORM DRAIN
(E)WATER VALVE(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
SD
W W
W
W

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
AS GAS
W
GAS GAS GAS 8"SD
8"SD
D
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD
8"SD 8 SD" 8"SD 40 01 50 50 10 5 1 4 1 4
1 4
18 4
18 2 20
24 24
2526
28 27
27 27
27 31
33 39
39 30
G
GA
8"SD
AS

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 907

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
WWWWW

O H O H O H O H H O O O H O O O H H H O O O H H

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
11 12 13 14 15 16 50 50 50 50 50
SD
SD
SD
SD SD SD SD 11 12 13 14 15 16 50 50 50 50 50

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W

SD SD SD
17 18 19 20 50 50 50 50 50

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 17 18 19 20 50 50 50 50 50
Revision
No. Description Apprvd. By Date By DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
RECORD DWGS.

AS SHOWN APPROVED BY:

DATE

CITY ENGINEER
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA DATE SIGNED:

SHEET NO.

OF SHEETS
WT19013
PROJECT NO.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
11/15/2024
XX
100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 11/15/24 AH

EAST POPLAR STREET

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
C6.8 AH
LAR
AH
FOR CONTINUATION SEE BELOW FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C6.9 SCALE IN FEET 0 20'10' 40' SCALE IN FEET 0 20'10' 40' FOC (TYP.)
BOW (TYP.)
R/W (TYP.)
FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C6.7

FOR CONTINUATION SEE ABOVE

E POPLAR STREET

E POPLAR STREET
6 IMPROVEMENT KEY NOTES
7 NOTES
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG.

R-66; MODIFY BACK OF RAMP CURB PER GRADING PLAN
CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE YELLOW CROSSWALK STRIPE PERCITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113 34 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER VALVE

CONSTRUCT VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF
STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-52 AND R-55

CONSTRUCT ROLL CURB TO VERTICAL CURB TRANSITION
AND SIDEWALK PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-53 AND
R-55
35 STRIPING PER CALTRANS DETAIL NUMBER
# ROADSIDE SIGN PER CAMUTCD SIGN DESIGNATION
8-INCH ASPHALT CONCRETE DEEP LIFT. SAWCUTSHALL BE 2.0-FEET FROM LIP OF GUTTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.
1 6-INCH CONCRETE OVER 4-INCH CLASS II
AGGREGATE BASE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-51 OR R-52 OR R-53 AS APPLICABLE, ANDPER R-55. PROVIDE JOINTS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-50.
2 20
CONSTRUCT 12" PVC SDR 35 STORM DRAIN PIPE
19 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE HOLE (TYPE 1) PERCITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. D-5 24

CONSTRUCT FLARED END SECTION
CONSTRUCT 18"x18" PRECAST DROP INLET
(JENSEN 100001013 OR EQUIVALENT)
14 28
39 RELOCATE EXISTING JOINT POLERELOCATE EXISTING SIGNRELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX 47 CONSTRUCT YIELD LINES PER CALTRANS 2022 STANDARD PLAN A24G4849 51 5253
14 20
19 19
24 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CAP OF CDF FILL (1-SACK),
VERTICAL FROM CENTERLINE OF PIPE TO 6" ABOVE TOP OF
PIPE AND HORIZONTAL 12" FROM EDGES OF PIPE
28 35
CONSTRUCT 8" PVC SDR 35 STORM DRAIN PIPE
39 RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER
47 48
49 49 49 49
49 49 49 49 49 49 49
28 28
30 CONNECT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 30 34 34 34 34 35
35 35
35 35 35 35 35 35

CONSTRUCT STORM DRAIN MESSAGE PER CITY OF
STOCKTON STD. DWG. D-10 26
26 26
26 26
26 26
26 26
26 26
51 51
51 51 51
51 51
52 52
28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2
ASPHALT PAVEMENT, 4 INCH ASPHALT
CONCRETE OVER 4 INCH CLASS 2 AGGREGATE
BASE. SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT 12 INCHES OF
SUBGRADE TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION
3B
3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B
3B 3B 3B 3B 3B
CONSTRUCT "SLOW SCHOOL XING" MARKINGS PER CITY OF
STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113 AND CA-MUTCD FIG. 3B-2 54
54 54
50 LF
6 6 6 6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6 6 6
FOW (TYP.)
FOC (TYP.)
BOW (TYP.)
R/W (TYP.)
FOW (TYP.)
(E)FOC (TYP.)
(E)BOW (TYP.)
R/W (TYP.)
(E)EP (TYP.)
(E)FOC (TYP.)
(E)BOW (TYP.)
R/W (TYP.)
(E)EP (TYP.)
EP (TYP.)
EP (TYP.)

FILLMORE SCHOOL SITE
(E)FIRE HYDRANT(CAL WATER)RELOCATE BEHIND WALK
(E)WATER VALVE(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
UTILITY CROSSING(E) CAL WATER(N) 12" STORM DRAIN (E)JOINT POLE (AT&T, PG&E, COMCAST)RELOCATE
(2)(E)WATER METERS(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
UTILITY CROSSING(E) CAL WATER(N) 12" STORM DRAIN
UTILITY CROSSING(E) CAL WATER(N) 12" STORM DRAIN
UTILITY CROSSING(E) CAL WATER(N) 12" STORM DRAIN
Reduced cover between finishgrade and existing Cal Watermain, throughout entire lengthof Poplar Street Reduced cover between finishgrade and existing PG&E gasmain, throughout entire lengthof Poplar Street

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W SD
SD
SDSD
11 21 31 41 51 61

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W

SD DS SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
W 19
28 30 AS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS G WWWUTILITY CROSSING GAS GAS GAS GAS GA WG GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS W24 50 LF

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS G 26 54

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 908

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH HO
HO
H
OH
H
OH

GAS GAS

W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W

H O H O H H H O O H O H H H O O O H H O O O H O H O O O H H O O HO H O H H H O SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
D D
D
21 22 23 24 25 50 50 50 50 50

SD SD SD
21 22 23 24 25 50 50 50 50 50
40 50 50

A GOLDEN GATE
21 22 23 24 25 50 50 50 50 50
40 50 50
N 2176646.0139
E 6344688.9537
N 2176590.2038
E 6344706.4910
N 2176633.0213E 6344720.2898
N 2176506.8676
E 6344411.2255
EG @ CENTERLINE
Revision
No. Description Apprvd. By Date By DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
RECORD DWGS.

AS SHOWN APPROVED BY:

DATE

CITY ENGINEER
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA DATE SIGNED:

SHEET NO.

OF SHEETS
WT19013
PROJECT NO.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
11/15/2024
XX
100% PS&E SUBMITTAL 11/15/24 AH

EAST POPLAR STREET

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
C6.9 AH
LAR
AH

SCALE IN FEET
0 20'10' 40'
FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C6.8
FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET C6.10

E POPLAR STREET
21+00 21+50 22+00
2010
20 10
22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50
30 30
6 IMPROVEMENT KEY NOTES
7 NOTES
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG.

R-66; MODIFY BACK OF RAMP CURB PER GRADING PLAN
CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE YELLOW CROSSWALK STRIPE PERCITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113CONSTRUCT "STOP" MARKINGS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113 AND CA-MUTCD FIG. 3B-2 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER VALVE

CONSTRUCT ROLL CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF STOCKTON
STD. DWG. R-51 AND R-55

CONSTRUCT VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF
STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-52 AND R-55
5 CONSTRUCT ROLL CURB TO VERTICAL CURB TRANSITION
AND SIDEWALK PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-53 AND
R-55
35 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-65 CONSTRUCT 24" WIDE WHITE ADVANCE STOP BAR PER CITYOF STOCKTON STD. DWG. NO. R-113

STRIPING PER CALTRANS DETAIL NUMBER
# ROADSIDE SIGN PER CAMUTCD SIGN DESIGNATION
8-INCH ASPHALT CONCRETE DEEP LIFT. SAWCUTSHALL BE 2.0-FEET FROM LIP OF GUTTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.
1 6-INCH CONCRETE OVER 4-INCH CLASS II
AGGREGATE BASE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-51 OR R-52 OR R-53 AS APPLICABLE, ANDPER R-55. PROVIDE JOINTS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-50.
2 20
22 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE INLET (TYPE 1) WITH STORM DRAIN
MESSAGE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. D-6 AND D-10
23 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE HOLE (TYPE 1) PERCITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. D-5 CONSTRUCT 12" PVC SDR 35 STORM DRAIN PIPE

ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
33 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
24 31
CONSTRUCT 18"x18" PRECAST DROP INLET
(JENSEN 100001013 OR EQUIVALENT)
25 CONNECT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING

DRAINAGE INLET
28 CONSTRUCT COVER TO EXISTING DRAINAGE INLET
1214
39 RELOCATE EXISTING SIGNRELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX
3738
ASPHALT PAVEMENT, 0.35 FEET ASPHALT
CONCRETE OVER 1.25 FEET CLASS 2
AGGREGATE BASE (TI=7, ASSUMED R=5).

SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT 12 INCHES OFSUBGRADE TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION 3A
RELOCATE EXISTING JOINT POLE 47
4849
51 53
CONSTRUCT 8" PVC SDR 35 STORM DRAIN PIPE

RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER
FOC (TYP.) BOW (TYP.)
R/W (TYP.)
FOW (TYP.)
(E)FOC (TYP.)
(E)BOW (TYP.)
R/W (TYP.)
(E)EP (TYP.)
EP (TYP.)
7 7
47 12
12 20 20
22 22
22 23
23 24
24 25 25 25 25
25 25
25 25 25
14 28 28 28
28 28
28 28
28 24
28 28
28 33
31 35
35 51
51 38 38
37 39
39 47 47
RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 55
55 48
48 1
2 2
3A OH W W W W W W W W W W W W W 21 22 23 24 25
1 22
2 23 25 28 38 38 3A

OH AS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

GAS GAS GAS GAS
GAS GAS GAS GAS GASW SD SD SD SD SD SD SD D D 04 50 20 22 22 23 24 28 35 51 37 1

FILLMORE SCHOOL SITE
UTILITY CROSSING(E) CAL WATER(N) 12" STORM DRAIN
(E)WATER VALVE(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
(E)WATER METER(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
(E)JOINT POLE(AT&T, PG&E, COMCAST)RELOCATE (E)WATER METER (CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
(E)FIRE HYDRANT(CAL WATER)RELOCATE BEHIND WALK
(2)(E)WATER METERS(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
(E)JOINT POLE(AT&T, PG&E, COMCAST)RELOCATE
(2)(E)JOINT POLES(AT&T, PG&E, COMCAST)RELOCATE
(E)WATER VALVE(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE
(E)WATER VALVE(CAL WATER)ADJUST TO GRADE Reduced cover between new asphalt surface andexisting PG&E gas main
Reduced cover between finishgrade and existing Cal Watermain, throughout entire lengthof Poplar Street

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 909

SD SD SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
D
25 50 50 35 36 37 38 39 40 50 50 50 50
1 2 3 4 5 5 50 50 50 50 50
35 36 37 38 39 40 50 50 50 50
25 50 50 E POPLAR ST 35 36 37 38 39 40 50 50 50 50 SEE SHEET #### OH
HO
HOH
HO
H

OH OH HO OH OH HO OH OH OH HO OH OH HO OH HO OH OH OH
AS G
S
AS G
SA G
SA G
GAS

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
GAS SA G AS G40 GAS 7 S GA GAS GAS GAS GAS S G 63A
GAS
W
W
W
W
WW
EG @ CENTERLINE

SCALE IN FEET
0 10'5' 20'
Revision
No. Description Apprvd. By Date By DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA SCALE

DESIGNED BYDRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
RECORD DWGS.

AS SHOWN APPROVED BY:

DATE

CITY ENGINEER
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA DATE SIGNED:

SHEET NO.

OF SHEETS
WT19013
PROJECT NO.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
3/12/2025
XX
CTC SET 3/12/25 AH
###################################
##### AH
LAR
AH
FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET #####

GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
36+00 36+50 37+00
2010
20 10
37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00
30 30
FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET ####
6 IMPROVEMENT KEY NOTES
7 NOTES
CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG.

R-66; MODIFY BACK OF RAMP CURB PER GRADING PLAN
CONSTRUCT VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OFSTOCKTON STD. DWG. R-52 AND R-55

CONSTRUCT ROLL CURB TO VERTICAL CURB TRANSITION
AND SIDEWALK PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-53 AND
R-55
18 STRIPING PER CALTRANS DETAIL NUMBER
# ROADSIDE SIGN PER CAMUTCD SIGN DESIGNATION
8-INCH ASPHALT CONCRETE DEEP LIFT. SAWCUTSHALL BE 2.0-FEET FROM LIP OF GUTTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.
1 6-INCH CONCRETE OVER 4-INCH CLASS II
AGGREGATE BASE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD.

DWG. R-51 OR R-52 OR R-53 AS APPLICABLE, ANDPER R-55. PROVIDE JOINTS PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. R-50.
2 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE INLET (TYPE 1) WITH STORM DRAIN
MESSAGE PER CITY OF STOCKTON STD. DWG. D-6 AND D-10
CONSTRUCT 12" PVC SDR 35 STORM DRAIN PIPE
14 19
2528

CONSTRUCT CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PER CALTRANS
2022 STANDARD PLAN A24F
CONSTRUCT YIELD LINES PER CALTRANS 2022 STANDARD
PLAN A24G
RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX 49
1 2
1 2
6 25 25
7 7 14
14 18
19 19
28 28
49 1.5" MIN. GRIND EX AC AND 1.5" AC OVERLAY, OR
AS NOTED ON GRADING DETAIL (SEE SHEET XX) 4
4 2

SD SD SD SD
38 39 50 50 50

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS G GAS GAS GAS GAS 39 GAS GAS GAS50 GAS GAS 38 GAS GAS GAS 50 GAS GAS 1 2 6 25 25 28 28

AREA OF UTILITYLOCATION

FILLMORE SCHOOL SITE
EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT 1 910
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Phase 2 Kickoff 1 day Wed 10/15/25Wed 10/15/25
2 Utility A Letters 14 days Thu 10/16/25 Tue 11/4/25 1
3 Utility location 4 wks Wed 11/5/25 Tue 12/2/25 2
4 65% PS&Es 49 days Thu 10/16/25 Tue 12/23/25 1
5 City review of 65% Submittal 5 wks Wed 12/24/25Tue 1/27/26 4 6 Utility B Letters 15 days Wed 12/24/25Tue 1/13/26 4
7 Plats and Legal Descriptions 20 days Wed 1/28/26 Tue 2/24/26 5 8 100% PS&Es 65 days Wed 1/28/26 Tue 4/28/26 5
9 City review of 100% Submittal 4 wks Wed 4/29/26 Tue 5/26/26 8 10 CTC Review 7 wks Wed 4/29/26 Tue 6/16/26 8
11 CTC Meeting 2 days Thu 6/25/26 Fri 6/26/26
12 Bid Set Package 35 days Mon 6/29/26 Fri 8/14/26 11
13 Utility C Letters 15 days Mon 8/17/26 Fri 9/4/26 12
14 Procure Funds 395 days Mon 8/17/26 Fri 2/18/28 12
15 Advertise/Bid 3 mons Mon 2/21/28 Fri 5/12/28 14
16 Construction Period 500 days Mon 5/15/28 Fri 4/12/30 15 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
R.E.Y. Engineers
Stockton SRTS Sidewalk Gap Closure Project
Phase 2 Schedule

Page 1 ends

Project: Phase 2 Schedule
Date: Wed 7/30/25

EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT 1
911
Updated 12/26/24
Vendor: Date: 08/12/25
Dept: Contract/PO Number: 425000115
Account # Requestor: Wes Johnson
$ 389,959.00
06/18/24
Original Contract Council Approval Date: 06/18/24
09/30/28
$ 938,759.00
$ 548,800.00
Effective Date: Dec 2, 2021
CM Authority: $ 100,000 09/30/28

D M WD CM CC
CURRENT BALANCES OF CCOs
Last Council Action $ 06/18/24 389,959.00 - $ 138,995.90 $ Total approved CCOs since last Council Action 138,054.00 $ $ 941.90 528,013.00 $ NEW PROPOSED CCOs
$ 138,995.90 528,013.00 $
3 Amendment No. 3 $ Y 938,759.00 410,746.00 $ (409,804.10) $ Current CCO amount $ 410,746.00
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CCOs
Original Contract Y 06/18/24 389,959.00 $
1 Amendment No. 1 $ 0 0 0 Y 439,959.00 50,000.00 $
2 Amendment No. 2 $ 0 0 0 Y 528,013.00 88,054.00 $
Previous CCO Amount -----> 138,054.00 $ 6/18/2024 389,959.00 $ Total CCO Amount and Time Extension To-Date -----> 548,800.00 $ Revised
Contract Amount
Revised
CCO Authority Balance
Required
Approval
by:

Date CC
Approved
CCO No. Description (mm/dd/yy)
Requested
CCO Amount
Time
Extensions

ENTRIES IN BOLD RED INDICATE
YOUR BALANCE OF CM AUTHORITY CCO AMOUNT IS EXCEEDED.

YOU MUST GO TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.

Original Contract Amount:

Original Contract Award Date:

Original Contract Expiration Date:

Contract Amount to date:

Authorized CCO Amount to date:

Contract Expiration to date:

CHANGE ORDER CALCULATOR
R.E.Y. ENGINEERS, INC.

Public Works
WT19013 /
912
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-1009, Version: 1
PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVE FOUR RESOLUTIONS AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION WITH PROPOSED FORMATION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1 (CANNERY PARK EAST)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council:

1. Approve the following four resolutions:
a) A resolution of formation establishing Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) (the “CFD”) authorizing the levy of a special tax within the CFD and establishing an appropriations limit for the CFD.
b) A resolution determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000.
c) A resolution calling for an election for the purpose of submitting the levy of the special tax and the establishment of the appropriations limit to the qualified electors of the CFD. d) A resolution declaring the results of the election and directing the recording of a notice of special tax lien.

2. Adopt an ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax within the CFD.

The resolutions authorize the City Manager or designee to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolutions, including entering into an acquisition agreement for the distribution of bond proceeds to pay for authorized facilities and fees for the CFD.

Summary
The City was approached by the landowner Jen California 31, LLC who acquired a portion of the property from Arnaiz Homes within the existing boundary of CFD 2019-1 (Cannery Park II). The current special taxes within CFD 2019-1 are fixed at an annual amount of $1,600 per year and are collected for the repayment of bonds already issued for that CFD. This new overlapping CFD will provide additional funding necessary to complete improvements related to the CFD. Future bonds will be issued to provide the primary funding for the authorized facilities and fees. The District comprises 311 single-family residential lots which have been sold to two merchant builders.

The Council approved the resolutions necessary to begin the process of forming the CFD on August 12, 2025, and set a public hearing date of September 23, 2025. The recommended resolutions, City of Stockton Page 1 of 4 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
913
File #: 25-1009, Version: 1
attached to this agenda item, finalize formation by calling for the landowner election (which can be held immediately because the City has procured waivers of the time otherwise required), certify the election results, and authorize the placement of special taxes on the tax roll.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Government Code Sections 53311 et seq.), was enacted by the California Legislature to provide an alternate method of financing certain essential public capital facilities and services, especially in the developing areas of the State of California. Once duly established by a city, county, or other local agency, a CFD is a legally formed governmental entity with defined boundaries, with the governing board or legislative body of the local agency acting on its behalf. Subject to approval by a two-thirds vote of qualified electors within the boundaries in compliance with the provisions of the Act, a legislative body of a local agency may issue bonds for a CFD to finance public facilities and may levy and collect a special tax within a CFD to repay such indebtedness.

Present Situation
The initial boundary of the District will include just the portion of property originally acquired by Jen California 31, LLC (the “Developer”). The portion acquired is already in CFD No. 2019-1 (Cannery Park II) but remains undeveloped. The special taxes payable by the property owners will be in addition to the already fixed $1,600 per year of facilities special tax and the services special tax already collected from the properties within CFD No. 2019-1. The District will consist of 311 singlefamily residential homes. The Developer sold 64 lots to Richmond American Homes on October 25, 2024, and 267 lots to Century Communities on May 19, 2025. If formed, the District will help fund the acquisition of authorized facilities and the payment of fees.

Steps in Initiating the Formation of a Community Facilities District The Council approved the resolutions necessary to begin the process of forming the CFD on August 12, 2025, and set a public hearing date of September 23, 2025.

The law requires that a CFD can only be formed, and the tax approved, by a 2/3rds vote of the qualified electors within the CFD, which can be registered voters or landowners. If there are fewer than 12 registered voters residing within the boundaries of the CFD (as is the case here), then the qualified electors are the landowners with one vote for each acre of land owned. The landowners in the proposed CFD have filed the necessary waiver and consent documents with the City Clerk shortening the time periods and waiving various requirements for conducting a mailed ballot election.

Steps in Completing the Formation of a Community Facilities District

1. Adoption of the following resolutions will take the next steps necessary to complete the formation after the conclusion of the public hearing:
a) A resolution of formation establishing Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) authorizing the levy of a special tax within the CFD and establishing an City of Stockton Page 2 of 4 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
914
File #: 25-1009, Version: 1
appropriations limit for the CFD.
b) A resolution determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000.
c) A resolution calling for an election for the purpose of submitting the levy of the special tax and the establishment of the appropriations limit to the qualified electors of the CFD. d) A resolution declaring the results of the election and directing the recording of a notice of special tax lien.

2. Adoption of the ordinance authorizes the levy of a special tax within the CFD and will complete the formation process.

Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax
Parcels within the proposed CFD will pay a maximum annual special tax based on the RMA, commonly referred to as the Special Tax Formula. The annual costs will include:
· Administrative Expenses
· Debt Service (i.e., principal and interest on bonds)
· Replenishment of the reserve fund (when necessary)
· An amount equal to estimated special tax delinquencies The annual costs funded by the levy of the special tax will be determined by subtracting other available revenues, such as reimbursement payments, fees, funds available from prepaid special taxes, interest earnings on the bond reserve fund, or receipts of delinquent special taxes from previous fiscal years, from the annual costs. The City will then apply the Special Tax Formula to determine the special tax levy for each parcel.

In addition, all parcels within CFD 2019-1 (Cannery Park II), including those within the CFD, already pay a services tax that will continue to be collected.

The City has completed all legal matters needing to take place before the public hearing concerning the formation of the proposed CFD, including recording a Boundary Map showing the CFD boundaries with the San Joaquin County Recorder, and published in the Stockton Record a Notice of the Public Hearing to be conducted this evening. Certificates certifying both actions regarding notification are on file with the City Clerk.

Incurrence of bonded indebtedness:

During the formation process of the CFD, the not to exceed bonded indebtedness is established at $15 million. None of the actions taken this evening approve the issuance of bonds. It is anticipated, as development occurs within the CFD by the two merchant builders owning the lots, staff will bring forward later for City Council consideration the issuance of bonds to finance the authorized facilities and fees.

City of Stockton Page 3 of 4 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
915
File #: 25-1009, Version: 1

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The cost to the City to form the CFD is estimated at $39,500 and includes the fees and expenses of the Special Tax Consultant (Willdan Financial Services), Bond Counsel (Jones Hall) and the City’s Municipal Advisor (Del Rio Advisors, LLC). The Developer has deposited $39,500 with the City to cover the estimated costs of formation.

Ultimately, when bonds are issued, the City will receive an administrative fee based on a sliding scale of the issuance based on three-quarters of one-percent (.75%) up to the first $5 million of the par amount of the bond issue; one-half of one-percent (.50%) of the par amount of the bond issue over $5 million up to $10 million; one-quarter of one-percent (.25%) of the par amount of the bond issue over $10 million. The City’s Administration Fee is a component of the cost of issuance and is paid from bond proceeds.

These bonds are not an obligation of the City and are payable solely from the collection of special taxes and any funds and accounts established under the documents of any future bonds. There is no adverse impact on the General Fund nor any other funds or accounts of the City.

City of Stockton Page 4 of 4 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
916
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION TO FORM A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO LEVY A

SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF

CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES IN AND FOR SUCH DISTRICT

CITY OF STOCKTON
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1
(CANNERY PARK EAST)
On August 12, 2025, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the “Act”), this City Council adopted a resolution titled “Resolution of Intention to Form a Community Facilities District and to Levy a Special Tax Therein to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Such District” (the “Resolution of Intention”), stating its intention to form “City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) (the “CFD”); and
The Resolution of Intention, incorporating a map of the proposed boundaries of the CFD and stating the facilities to be provided, the cost of providing such facilities, and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the CFD to pay the principal and interest on bonds proposed to be issued with respect to the CFD, the cost of the facilities, is on file with the City Clerk and the provisions thereof are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein; and On this date, this City Council held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed formation of the CFD; and At the hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the facilities to be provided therein and the levy of said special tax were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and A the hearing evidence was presented to this City Council on said matters before it, including a CFD hearing report (the “Report”) which City staff caused to be prepared as to the facilities to be provided through the CFD and the costs thereof, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, and this City Council at the conclusion of said hearing is fully advised in the premises; and
The special tax proposed to be levied in the CFD to pay for the proposed facilities to be provided therein, as set forth in the formula in Exhibit 1 hereto, has not been eliminated by protest by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the CFD or the owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the CFD not exempt from the special tax; now, therefore, 917

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The proposed special tax to be levied within the CFD has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to section 53324 of the Act.

3. All prior proceedings taken by this City Council in connection with the establishment of the CFD and the levy of the special tax have been duly considered and are hereby found and determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act.

4. The community facilities district designated “City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East)” is hereby established pursuant to the Act.

5. The boundaries of the CFD, as set forth in the map of the CFD heretofore on August 21, 2025 at 9:51 o’clock a.m., in Book 7 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 107, as Document No. 2025-070347 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of San Joaquin, State of California, are hereby approved, are incorporated herein by reference and shall be the boundaries of the CFD.

6. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the CFD pursuant to the Act shall consist of those items listed as facilities in Exhibit 2 hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (the “Facilities”).

7. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the CFD to pay for the Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds issued by the City for the CFD to construct and/or acquire the Facilities, a special tax (the “Special Tax”) sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the CFD, will be levied annually within the CFD, and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, or in such other manner as the Council or its designee shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes among the parcels of real property within the CFD, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the CFD to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay and the length of time such amount may be levied, are described in the Rate and Method of Apportionment attached hereto as Exhibit 1 hereto and hereby incorporated herein (the “Rate and Method”), provided that under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied in any fiscal year against any parcel used for private residential purposes be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner or owners of any other parcel or parcels within the district by more than 10% above the amount that would have been levied in that fiscal year had there never been any such delinquencies or defaults.

Except as may otherwise be provided by law or by the Rate and Method, all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States, the State of California and the 918
City, or any departments or political subdivisions thereof, shall be omitted from the levy of the Special Taxes. In the event that a portion of the property within the CFD shall become for any reason exempt, wholly or in part, from the levy of the Special Tax, the Council will, on behalf of the CFD, increase the levy to the extent necessary upon the remaining property within the CFD which is not exempt in order to yield the required debt service payments and other annual expenses of the CFD, if any, subject to the provisions of the Rate and Method. It is anticipated that the Special Taxes will be billed as a separate line item on the regular property tax bill. However, the Council reserves the right, under Section 53340 of the Act, to utilize any method of collecting the Special Taxes which it shall, from time to time, determine to be in the best interests of the City, including, but not limited to, direct billing by the City to the property owners and supplemental billing.

The Council hereby finds that the provisions of sections 53313.6, 53313.7 and 53313.9 of the Act (relating to adjustments to ad valorem property taxes and schools financed by a community facilities district) are inapplicable to the proposed CFD.

Special Tax A, which is used to finance the Facilities and pay for bonds issued by the City for the CFD to construct and/or acquire the Facilities, shall not be levied in the CFD after the fiscal year specified in the Rate and Method, except that a Special Tax that was lawfully levied in or before the final tax year and that remains delinquent may be collected in subsequent years. Under no circumstances shall the Special Tax levied against any parcel in the CFD used for private residential purposes be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or parcels within the CFD by more than 10 percent.

8. It is hereby found and determined that the Facilities are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as the result of development occurring in the CFD.

9. The Debt & Treasury Manager of the City, 425 N. El Dorado Street, Stockton, California 95202, (209) 937-8908, is the officer of the City who will be responsible for preparing annually a current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor’s parcel number and who will be responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to the Act.

10. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the CFD and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the City ceases.

11. In accordance with the Act, the annual appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, of the CFD is hereby preliminarily established at $15,000,000, and said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the voters of the CFD as hereafter provided. The proposition establishing 919
said annual appropriations limit shall become effective if approved by the qualified electors voting thereon and shall be adjusted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Act.

12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the Special Tax and the proposition of the establishment of the appropriations limit specified above shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the CFD at an election. The time, place and conditions of the election shall be as specified by a separate resolution of the City Council.

13. Section 53314.9 of the Act provides that, either before or after formation of the CFD, the City may accept work in-kind from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or private entities, may provide, by resolution, for the use of that work inkind for any authorized purpose and the City Council may enter into an agreement (an “Acquisition Agreement”), by resolution, with the person or entity advancing the work inkind, to reimburse the person or entity for the value, or cost, whichever is less, of the work in-kind, as determined by the City Council, with or without interest, under the conditions specified in the Act. Any work in-kind must be performed or constructed as if the work had been performed or constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, the City. The City Manager of the City (or his or her designee) is authorized to enter into an Acquisition Agreement in such form as such bond counsel to the City and such officer deem appropriate.

14. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED September 23, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
920
1 Rate and Method of
Apportionment of Special Tax
City of Stockton
Community Facilities District No. 2025-1
(Cannery Park East)
A Special Tax shall be levied on all Taxable Property within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) of the City of Stockton (“CFD No. 2025-1”) and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27, in an amount determined by the CFD Administrator through the application of the procedures described below. All the real property within CFD No. 2025-1, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided.

1. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
“Acre” or “Acreage” means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Map. An Acre means 43,560 square feet of land. “Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. “Administrative Expenses” means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs related to the administration of CFD No. 2025-1 including, but not limited to: the costs of preparing and computing the Special Tax (whether by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the City or otherwise); the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the Trustee; the costs of the Trustee (including its legal counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under the Indenture; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2025-1, or any designee thereof complying with arbitrage rebate requirements, including without limitation rebate liability costs and periodic rebate calculations; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2025-1, or any designee thereof complying with disclosure or reporting requirements of the City or CFD No. 2025-1, associated with applicable federal and State laws; the costs associated with preparing Special Tax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs to the City, CFD No. 2025-1, or any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; and the City’s annual administration fees and third-party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2025-1 for any other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2025-1, including attorney’s fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes.

EXHIBIT 1 921
2 “Approved Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) that have not been issued a Building Permit on or prior to the May 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. “Assessor” means the Assessor of the County of San Joaquin. “Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor designating parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means the number assigned to an Assessor’s Parcel by the County for purposes of identification.
“Assigned Special Tax” means the Special Tax of that name described in Section 3.A below. “Backup Special Tax” means the Special Tax of that name described in Section 3.B below. “Bonds” means any bonds or other Debt of CFD No. 2025-1, whether in one or more series, secured by the levy of Special Taxes.
“Building Permit” means a building permit for construction of a Residential Unit within CFD No. 2025-1, issued by the City.
“Building Square Footage” means all of the square footage of usable area within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, or similar area.

The determination of Building Square Footage shall be made by reference to the Building Permit(s) issued for such Assessor’s Parcel and/or by reference to appropriate records kept by the City.
“Calendar Year” means the period commencing January 1 of any year and ending the following December 31.
“CFD Administrator” means an authorized representative of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement, for preparing the Special Tax roll and/or calculating the Backup Special Tax.
“CFD No. 2025-1” means the City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) established by the City Council under the Act. “City” means the City of Stockton, California.
“City Council” means the City Council of the City, acting for the CFD under the Act. “County” means the County of San Joaquin, California.
“Debt” means any binding obligation to pay or repay a sum of money, including obligations in the form of bonds, certificates of participation, long-term leases, loans from government agencies, or loans from banks, other financial institutions, private businesses, or individuals, or long-term contracts.

EXHIBIT 1 922
3 “Debt Service” means for each Fiscal Year, the total amount of principal and interest payable on any Outstanding Bonds during the Calendar Year commencing on January 1 of such Fiscal Year. “Developed Property” means for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property, exclusive of Provisional Property, for which a Building Permit was issued prior to May 1 of the previous Fiscal Year. An Assessor’s Parcel classified as Developed Property but for which the Building Permit that caused such Assessor’s Parcel to be classified as Developed Property has been cancelled and/or voided prior to the Fiscal Year for which Special Taxes are being levied shall be reclassified as Undeveloped Property, provided that the levy of the Special Tax after such reclassification shall not be less than 1.1 times the annual Debt Service less Administrative Expenses on all Outstanding Bonds. If Bonds have not been issued, an Assessor’s Parcel classified as Developed Property for which such a Building Permit has been cancelled and/or voided shall be reclassified as Undeveloped Property.
“Exempt Property” means for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels designated as being exempt from Special Taxes pursuant to Section 8 below.
“Final Map” means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map, or lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 4285 that creates individual lots for which Building Permits may be issued without further subdivision.
“Fiscal Year” means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. “Indenture” means the indenture, fiscal agent agreement, resolution or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and/or supplemented from time to time, and any instrument replacing or supplementing the same. “Land Use Class” means any of the classes listed in Table 1 under Section 3 below. “Lot” means a parcel created by a Final Map on which a Residential Unit can be constructed. “Maximum Special Tax” means for each Assessor’s Parcel, the maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Sections 3.C and 3.D below, which may be levied in a given Fiscal Year on such Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property.
“Non-Residential Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit has been issued for the purpose of constructing one or more non-residential units or facilities.
“Outstanding Bonds” means all Bonds, which are deemed to be outstanding under the Indenture.
“Prepayment Amount” means the amount required to prepay the Special Tax obligation in full for an Assessor’s Parcel as described in Section 6.A below. “Property Owner Association Property” means any Assessor’s Parcel within the boundaries of CFD No. 2025-1 owned in fee by a property owner association, including any master or subassociation.

EXHIBIT 1 923
4 “Proportionately” or “Proportionate” means for Developed Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the applicable Assigned Special Tax or Backup Special Tax is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property. For Undeveloped Property, “Proportionately” means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy per Acre to the Maximum Special Tax per Acre is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Undeveloped Property. “Proportionately” may similarly be applied to other categories of Taxable Property as listed in Section 4 below. “Provisional Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Public Property, Property Owner Association Property or property that would otherwise be classified as Exempt Property pursuant to the provisions of Section 8, but cannot be classified as Exempt Property because to do so would reduce the Acreage of all Taxable Property below the required minimum Acreage as set forth in Section 8.
“Public Property” means any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2025-1, which is owned by, or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State of California, the County, or any other public agency; provided however that any property owned by a public agency and leased to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified in accordance with its use. “Residential Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit has been issued for the purpose of constructing one or more Residential Units. “Residential Unit” means each separate residential dwelling unit that comprises an independent facility capable of conveyance or rental, separate from adjacent residential dwelling units. “Special Tax” means the special tax levied within CFD No. 2025-1 pursuant to the Act and this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.
“Special Tax Obligation” means the total obligation of an Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property to pay the Special Tax for the remaining life of CFD No. 2025-1. “Special Tax Requirement” means that amount required in any Fiscal Year to: (i) pay regularly scheduled Debt Service on all Outstanding Bonds; (ii) pay periodic costs on the Outstanding Bonds, including but not limited to, credit enhancement and rebate payments on the Outstanding Bonds; (iii) pay Administrative Expenses; (iv) pay any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds for all Outstanding Bonds; (v) accumulate funds to pay directly for acquisition or construction of facilities provided that the inclusion of such amount does not cause an increase in the Special Tax to be levied on Undeveloped Property; and (vi) pay for reasonably anticipated delinquent Special Taxes based on the delinquency rate for Special Taxes levied in the previous Fiscal Year; less (vii) a credit for funds available to reduce the Special Tax levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator pursuant to the Indenture. “State” means the State of California.
“Taxable Property” means all the Assessor’s Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 2025-1, which are not exempt from the levy of the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section 8 below. “Tax Zone 1” means the area within CFD No. 2025-1 depicted as such in Exhibit A hereto. “Tax Zone 2” means the area within CFD No. 2025-1 depicted as such in Exhibit A hereto.

EXHIBIT 1 924
5 “Trustee” means the trustee or fiscal agent under the Indenture. “Undeveloped Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property or Provisional Property.

2. LAND USE CLASSIFICATION
Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2026-27, each Assessor’s Parcel within CFD No. 2025- 1 shall be classified as Taxable Property or Exempt Property. In addition, all Taxable Property shall further be classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property or Provisional Property and shall be subject to the levy of a Special Tax in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax determined pursuant to Sections 3 and 4 below.

Furthermore, each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property shall be classified according to its applicable Land Use Class based on its Land Use Type and Building Square Footage.

3. SPECIAL TAX RATES
A. Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property
The Assigned Special Tax applicable to an Assessor’s Parcel classified as Developed Property for Fiscal Year 2026-27 shall be determined pursuant to Table 1 below.

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assigned Special Tax Rates
For Developed Property Within Zone 1
Land
Use
Class
Land Use Type Square Footage
Category
FY 2026-27
Assigned
Special Tax per
Residential Unit
1 Residential Unit ≤ 2,000 sq. ft. $647
2 Residential Unit 2,001 – 2,250 sq. ft. $867
3 Residential Unit 2,251 – 2,500 sq. ft. $1,028
4 Residential Unit 2,501 – 2,750 sq. ft. $1,190
5 Residential Unit > 2,750 sq. ft. $1,286
EXHIBIT 1 925
6 Assigned Special Tax Rates
For Developed Property Within Zone 2
Land
Use
Class
Land Use Type Square Footage
Category
FY 2026-27
Assigned
Special Tax per
Residential Unit
1 Residential Unit ≤ 1,800 sq. ft. $922
2 Residential Unit 1,801 – 2,000 sq. ft. $1,108
3 Residential Unit 2,001 – 2,200 sq. ft. $1,245
4 Residential Unit 2,201 – 2,400 sq. ft. $1,371
5 Residential Unit 2,401 – 2,600 sq. ft. $1,497
6 Residential Unit 2,601 – 2,800 sq. ft. $1,623
7 Residential Unit 2,801 – 3,000 sq. ft. $1,768
8 Residential Unit 3,001 – 3,200 sq. ft. $2,025
9 Residential Unit 3,201 – 3,400 sq. ft. $2,283
10 Residential Unit > 3,400 sq. ft. $2,386
Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2027, the Assigned Special Tax rates shall be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect the prior Fiscal Year.

B. Backup Special Tax for Developed Property
The Backup Special Tax rates for Developed Property commencing with Fiscal Year 2026- 27 shall be $6,724 per Acre for Tax Zone 1 and $9,460 per Acre for Tax Zone 2.

Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2027, the Backup Special Tax rates shall be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect the prior Fiscal Year.

C. Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property
The Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property shall be the greater of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property and the Backup Special Tax for Developed Property.

D. Maximum Special Tax for Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Provisional Property
The Maximum Special Tax rates for Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Provisional Property commencing with Fiscal Year 2026-27 shall be $6,724 per Acre for Tax Zone 1 and $9,460 per Acre for Tax Zone 2.

Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2027, the Maximum Special Tax rates for Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Provisional Property shall be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect the prior Fiscal Year.

EXHIBIT 1 926
7 4. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
For each Fiscal Year, commencing Fiscal Year 2026-27, the CFD Administrator shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property in accordance with the following steps:

Step 1: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property up to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement;
Step 2: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after Step 1 has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Undeveloped Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Approved Property;
Step 3: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after Steps 1 and 2 have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Undeveloped Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property;
Step 4: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after Steps 1 through 3 have been completed, then the Special Tax amount determined in Step 1 shall be increased Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Developed Property; and
Step 5: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after Steps 1 through 4 have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Provisional Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Provisional Property.

Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied in any Fiscal Year against any Assessor’s Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased as a result of a delinquency or default in the payment of the Special Tax applicable to any other Assessor’s Parcel within CFD No. 2025-1 by more than ten percent (10%) above what would have been levied in the absence of such delinquencies or defaults.

5. COLLECTION OF SPECIAL TAXES
Collection of the Special Tax shall be made by the County in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and the Special Tax shall be subject to the same penalties and the same lien priority in the case of delinquency as ad valorem taxes; provided, however, that the City Council may provide for (i) other means of collecting the Special Tax, including direct billings thereof to the property owners, and (ii) judicial foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes.

EXHIBIT 1 927
8 6. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX OBLIGATION
A. Prepayment in Full
Property owners may prepay and permanently satisfy the Special Tax Obligation by a cash settlement with the City as permitted under Government Code Section 53344. The following definitions apply to this Section 6:
“CFD Public Facilities Costs” means $6,600,000 or such lower number as (i) shall be determined by the CFD Administrator as sufficient to acquire or construct the facilities to be financed under the Act and financing program for CFD No. 2025-1, or (ii) shall be determined by the City Council concurrently with a covenant that it will not issue any more Bonds (except refunding bonds).
“Construction Fund” means the fund (regardless of its name) established pursuant to the Indenture to hold funds, which are currently available for expenditure to acquire or construct the facilities or pay fees authorized to be funded by CFD No. 2025-1. “Future Facilities Costs” means the CFD Public Facilities Costs minus (i) costs previously paid from the Construction Fund to acquire or construct the facilities, (ii) monies currently on deposit in the Construction Fund, and (iii) monies of CFD No. 2025-1 currently on deposit in an escrow or other designated fund that are expected to be available to finance CFD Public Facilities Costs.
“Outstanding Bonds” means all Previously Issued Bonds, which remain outstanding as of the first interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year excluding Bonds to be redeemed at a later date with proceeds of prior Special Tax prepayments. “Previously Issued Bonds” means all Bonds that have been issued prior to the date of prepayment.

The Special Tax Obligation applicable to an Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property, or Undeveloped Property for which a Building Permit has been issued may be prepaid and the obligation to pay the Special Tax for such Assessor’s Parcel permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made with respect to a particular Assessor’s Parcel only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor’s Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor’s Parcel eligible to prepay the Special Tax Obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay, and designate or identify the company or agency that will be acting as the escrow agent, if any. The CFD Administrator shall provide the owner with a statement of the Prepayment Amount for such Assessor’s Parcel within thirty (30) days of the request, and may charge a reasonable fee for providing this service. Prepayment must be made at least 60 days prior to any redemption date for the CFD No. 2025-1 Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of such prepaid Special Taxes, unless a shorter period is acceptable to the Trustee and the City.

The Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated for each applicable Assessor’s Parcel or group of Assessor’s Parcels as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below):

EXHIBIT 1 928
9 Bond Redemption Amount
plus Redemption Premium
plus Future Facilities Prepayment Amount
plus Defeasance Amount
plus Prepayment Administrative Fees
less Reserve Fund Credit
less Capitalized Interest Credit
equals Prepayment Amount
As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Prepayment Amount (defined in Step 14 below) shall be calculated as follows:

Step No.:

1. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor’s Parcel.

2. For Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property, determine the Maximum Special Tax. For Assessor’s Parcels of Undeveloped Property for which a Building Permit has been issued, compute the Maximum Special Tax for that Assessor’s Parcel as though it was already designated as Developed Property, based upon the Building Permit which has already been issued for that Assessor’s Parcel.

3. Divide the Maximum Special Tax computed pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total expected Maximum Special Tax revenue for CFD No. 2025-1 assuming all Building Permits have been issued (build-out) within CFD No. 2025-1, excluding any Assessor’s Parcels for which the Special Tax Obligation has been previously prepaid.

4. Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the Outstanding Bonds to compute the amount of Outstanding Bonds to be retired and prepaid for all applicable parcels and round that amount up to the nearest $5,000 increment (the “Bond Redemption Amount”).

5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to paragraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (expressed as a percentage), if any, on the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed at the first available call date (the “Redemption Premium”).

6. Compute the Future Facilities Costs.

7. Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the amount determined pursuant to paragraph 6 to compute the amount of Future Facilities Costs to be prepaid (the “Future Facilities Prepayment Amount”).

8. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year until the expected redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds which, depending on the Indenture, may be as early as the next interest payment date.

EXHIBIT 1 929
10 9. Calculate the administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2025-1, including the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs of redeeming CFD No. 2025-1, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the “Prepayment Administrative Fees”).

10. Compute the amount the CFD Administrator reasonably expects to derive from the reinvestment of the Prepayment Amount less the Future Facilities Prepayment Amount and the Prepayment Administrative Fees from the date of prepayment until the redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed with the prepayment.

11. Subtract the amount computed in paragraph 9 from the amount computed in paragraph 8 (the “Defeasance Amount”).

12. If reserve funds for the Outstanding Bonds, if any, are at or above 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) on the prepayment calculation date, a reserve fund credit shall be calculated as a reduction in the applicable reserve fund for the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed pursuant to the prepayment (the “Reserve Fund Credit”). No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if, after the Prepayment Amount is calculated, reserve funds are below 100% of the reserve requirement.

13. If any capitalized interest for the Outstanding Bonds will not have been expended at the time of the first interest and/or principal payment following the current Fiscal Year, a capitalized interest credit shall be calculated by multiplying the quotient computed pursuant to paragraph 3 by the expected balance in the capitalized interest fund after such first interest and/or principal payment (the “Capitalized Interest Credit”).

14. The amount to prepay the Special Tax Obligation is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, 7, 9, and 11, less the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 12 and 13 (the “Prepayment Amount”).

15. From the Prepayment Amount, the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 5, and 11, less the amounts computed pursuant to paragraphs 12 and 13 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to retire Outstanding Bonds or make Debt Service payments. The amount computed pursuant to paragraph 7 shall be deposited into the Construction Fund. The amount computed pursuant to paragraph 9 shall be retained by CFD No. 2025-1.

The Prepayment Amount may be sufficient to redeem an amount other than a $5,000 increment of CFD No. 2025-1 Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000 or integral multiple thereof will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Indenture to redeem CFD No. 2025-1 Bonds to be used with the next prepayment of CFD No. 2025-1 Bonds.

EXHIBIT 1 930
11 The CFD Administrator will confirm that all previously levied Special Taxes have been paid in full. With respect to any Assessor’s Parcel for which the Special Tax Obligation is prepaid in full, once the CFD Administrator has confirmed that all previously levied Special Taxes have been paid, the City Council shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of the Special Tax and the release of the Special Tax lien on such Assessor’s Parcel, and the obligation of the owner of such Assessor’s Parcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax prepayment shall be allowed unless the aggregate amount of Maximum Special Taxes less Administrative Expenses that may be levied on Taxable Property, respectively, after the proposed prepayment is at least 1.1 times the Debt Service on all Outstanding Bonds in each Fiscal Year.

B. Partial Prepayment
The Special Tax on an Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property or Undeveloped Property for which a building permit has been issued may be partially prepaid. The amount of the prepayment shall be calculated as in Section 6.A.; except that a partial prepayment shall be calculated according to the following formula:

PP = (PE-A) x F+A
These terms have the following meaning:

PP = the partial prepayment
PE = the Prepayment Amount calculated according to Section 6.A F = the percentage by which the owner of the Assessor’s Parcel(s) is partially prepaying the Special Tax Obligation
A = the Prepayment Administrative Fees from Section 6.A The owner of any Assessor’s Parcel who desires such partial prepayment shall notify the CFD Administrator of (i) such owner’s intent to partially prepay the Special Tax Obligation, (ii) the percentage by which the Special Tax Obligation shall be prepaid, and (iii) the company or agency that will be acting as the escrow agent, if any. The CFD Administrator shall provide the owner with a statement of the amount required for the partial prepayment of the Special Tax Obligation for an Assessor’s Parcel within sixty (60) days of the request and may charge a reasonable fee for providing this service.

With respect to any Assessor’s Parcel that is partially prepaid, the City shall (i) distribute the funds remitted to it according to Section 6.A., and (ii) indicate in the records of CFD No. 2025-1 that there has been a partial prepayment of the Special Tax Obligation and that a portion of the Special Tax with respect to such Assessor’s Parcel, equal to the outstanding percentage (1.00 - F) of the Maximum Special Tax, shall continue to be levied on such Assessor’s Parcel.

EXHIBIT 1 931
12 Notwithstanding the foregoing, no partial prepayment shall be allowed unless the aggregate amount of Maximum Special Taxes less Administrative Expenses that may be levied on Taxable Property, respectively, after the proposed partial prepayment is at least

1.1 times the Debt Service on all Outstanding Bonds in each Fiscal Year.

7. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX
The Special Tax shall be levied as long as necessary to meet the Special Tax Requirement but not beyond Fiscal Year 2058-59, provided however that the Special Tax will cease to be levied in an earlier Fiscal Year if the CFD Administrator has determined that all required interest and principal payments on Bonds have been paid and all CFD Public Facilities Costs have been funded.

8. EXEMPTIONS
The CFD Administrator shall classify as Exempt Property (i) Assessor’s Parcels of Public Property, (ii) Assessor’s Parcels of Property Owner Association Property, or (iii) Assessor’s Parcels which are used as places of worship and are exempt from ad valorem property taxes because they are owned by a religious organization, (iv) Assessor’s Parcels with public or utility easements making impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the easement, and (v) Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property classified as Non-Residential Property as determined reasonably by the CFD Administrator, provided that no such classification would reduce the sum of all Taxable Property in CFD No. 2025-1 to less than 9.5 Acres for Tax Zone 1 and 44.7 Acres for Tax Zone 2. Exempt Property status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes eligible for classification as Exempt Property.

If the use of an Assessor’s Parcel of Exempt Property changes so that such Assessor’s Parcel is no longer classified as one of the uses set forth in the first paragraph of Section 8 above that would make such Assessor’s Parcel eligible to be classified as Exempt Property, such Assessor’s Parcel shall cease to be classified as Exempt Property and shall be deemed to be Taxable Property.

9. APPEALS
Any landowner who pays the Special Tax and claims the amount of the Special Tax levied on his or her Assessor’s Parcel is in error shall first consult with the CFD Administrator regarding such error not later than thirty-six (36) months after first having paid the first installment of the Special Tax that is disputed. If following such consultation, the CFD Administrator determines that an error has occurred, then the CFD Administrator shall take any of the following actions, in order of priority, in order to correct the error:
(i) Amend the Special Tax levy on the landowner’s Assessor’s Parcel(s) for the current Fiscal Year prior to the payment date,
(ii) Require the CFD to reimburse the landowner for the amount of the overpayment to the extent of available CFD funds, or
(iii) Grant a credit against, eliminate or reduce the future Special Taxes on the landowner’s Assessor’s Parcel(s) in the amount of the overpayment.

If following such consultation and action by the CFD Administrator the landowner believes such error still exists, such person may file a written notice of appeal with the City Council. Upon the EXHIBIT 1 932
13 receipt of such notice, the City Council or designee may establish such procedures as deemed necessary to undertake the review of any such appeal. If the City Council or designee determines an error still exists, the CFD Administrator shall take any of the actions described as (i), (ii) and (iii) above, in order of priority, in order to correct the error.

The City Council or designee thereof shall interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for purposes of clarifying any ambiguities and make determinations relative to the administration of the Special Tax and any landowner appeals. The decision of the City Council or designee shall be final and binding as to all persons.

EXHIBIT 1 933
A-1

EXHIBIT A

DESCRIPTION OF TAX ZONES
EXHIBIT 1 934
A-2
EXHIBIT 1 935

Page 1 ends

EXHIBIT 2

LIST OF AUTHORIZED FACILITIES

CITY OF STOCKTON
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1 (CANNERY PARK EAST) The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”) authorizes the creation of a Community Facilities District to finance public facilities, within or of benefit to the land in the district. The facilities shown below are proposed to be financed by the City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) (the “CFD”). The facilities shall be constructed, whether or not acquired in their completed states, pursuant to the plans and specifications approved by the City of Stockton (the "City") and the officials thereof, including the City Engineer.

FACILITIES
Authorized facilities for the CFD include these:

Roadway Improvements
Roadway improvements include improvements to roadways in the CFD and those offsite roadway improvements required to mitigate project-related impacts. Improvements may include site preparation and rough grading, sanitary sewer (i.e., sewer pipelines, manholes, laterals, cleanouts, and other necessary appurtenances in the public streets. Improvements also may include construction techniques used to extend the wastewater system underneath creeks or as an attachment to a bridge), domestic and non-potable water system(s) (i.e., water transmission pipelines, valves, fire hydrants, thrust blocks, and other necessary appurtenances.

Improvements also may include construction techniques used to extend the wastewater system underneath creeks or as an attachment to a bridge), storm drain storm (i.e., drainage pipelines, reinforced concrete pipe, manholes, catch basins, drop inlets, and other necessary appurtenances), culverts, headwalls, bus turnouts, dry utilities (e.g., electrical, gas, telephone, cable, fiber optics), curbs, gutter, sidewalks, electroliers, conduit, transformers, wiring, paving, landscaping, irrigation, pavement marking and signage, monument wells, sound walls and barricades.

Traffic Signal Improvements
Traffic signal improvements include all necessary equipment, facilities, and appurtenances at required intersections in the CFD or at off-site locations to mitigate projectrelated impacts.

Bridge Improvements
Bridge improvements may include the bridge deck, abutments and piers, retaining walls, drainage facilities, dry utility conduits, lighting, bollards, fencing, erosion control, curbs, gutters, and sidewalk.

EXHIBIT 2 936

Page 2 ends

Bicycle Pathway/Public Access Way Improvements
Bicycle pathway/public access way improvements may include site preparation, grading, erosion control, silt fencing, paving or other surfacing, bollards, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, refuse containers, benches, and signage.

Relocating or Undergrounding Irrigation Canals and Facilities Improvements associated with relocating or under grounding of irrigation canals and facilities may include excavation, grading, concrete lining of canals, erosion protection (e.g., rip rap), reinforced concrete pipe, manholes, access road, pedestrian trail, landscaping, land acquisition, and access road ways.

Non-Potable Water System Improvements
Improvements associated with a non-potable water system may include excavation, grading, fencing, motors and pumps, generator, electrical panel, controls, inlet pipes, discharge pipes, and access roadways.

Storm Water Basin and Pump Station Improvements
Storm water basin and pump station improvements may include excavation, grading, storm water quality design grasses, berms, rip rap, headwall structure, fencing, motors and pumps, generator, sump/wet well, electrical panel, controls, inlet pipes, discharge pipes, land acquisition, and access roadways.

Soundwall Improvements
Soundwall improvements may include concrete block, pillars, pilasters, rebar, footings, mortar, and concrete.

Railroad Underpass/Overpass Improvements
Improvements associated with railroad underpass/overpass may include demolition of existing facilities, utilities and infrastructure, excavation, bridges, abutments, piers, retaining walls, shoofly construction, track and signal relocation, relocation of utilities and infrastructure, roadway approaches and connections, land acquisition, and access roadways.

Incidental Expenses
The above-listed improvements include incidental expenses as authorized by the Act, including the cost of planning, obtaining permits, engineering and designing the improvements (including the cost of environmental evaluation thereof); the costs associated with creating the CFD, issuing bonds, and determining the amount of taxes and the collection of payment thereof; costs . otherwise incurred to carry out the authorized purpose of the CFD; and any other expenses incidental to constructing, completing, and inspecting the improvements.

EXHIBIT 2 937

Page 3 ends

OTHER
The CFD may also finance any of the following:

1. Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, reserve fund, capitalized interest, letter of credit fees and expenses, bond and disclosure counsel fees and expenses, bond remarketing costs, and all other incidental expenses.

2. Administrative fees of the City and the Bond trustee or fiscal agent related to the CFD and the Bonds.

3. Reimbursement of costs related to the formation of the CFD advanced by the City, the landowner(s) in the CFD, or any party related to any of the foregoing, as well as reimbursement of any costs advanced by the City, the landowner(s) in the CFD any party related to any of the foregoing, for facilities, fees or other purposes or costs of the CFD.

4. All “costs” and “incidental expenses” related to the eligible facilities as those terms are defined in the Act.

EXHIBIT 2 938
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION DETERMINING NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS

FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

CITY OF STOCKTON
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1
(CANNERY PARK EAST)
On August 12, 2025, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the “Act”), this City Council adopted a resolution titled “Resolution of Intention to Form a Community Facilities District and to Levy a Special Tax Therein to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Such District” (the “Resolution of Intention”), stating its intention to form the “City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) (the “CFD”); and
On August 12, 2025, this City Council also adopted a resolution titled “Resolution of Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Proposed Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East)” (the “Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness”) stating its intention to incur bonded indebtedness (as contemplated by the Act) within the boundaries of the CFD for the purpose of financing the costs of certain facilities specified in the Resolution of Intention; and
This City Council has held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act about the determination to proceed with the formation of the CFD, the provision of certain public facilities by the CFD and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the CFD to pay the cost of the facilities, the principal and interest on proposed bonded indebtedness in the CFD and the administrative costs of the City relative to the CFD; and
Subsequent to the public hearing, this City Council adopted a resolution titled “Resolution to Form a Community Facilities District and to Levy a Special Tax Therein to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Such District” (the “Resolution of Formation”); and
This City Council has also held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act relative to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness; and
939
No written protests with respect to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness have been filed with the City Clerk; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. In order to finance the costs of the Facilities, including, but not limited to, the costs of issuing and selling bonds to finance all or a portion of the Facilities and the costs of the City in establishing and administering the CFD, it is necessary for the City to incur bonded indebtedness in one or more series on behalf of the CFD in an aggregate amount not to exceed $15,000,000.

3. The whole of the CFD shall pay for the bonded indebtedness issued by the City for the CFD through the levy of the facilities special tax within the CFD. The tax shall be apportioned in accordance with the formula for set forth in Exhibit 2 to the Resolution of Formation.

4. Subject to Section 2 above, bonds (as contemplated by the Act) in the aggregate maximum amount not to exceed $15,000,000 are hereby authorized for the CFD subject to voter approval. Bonds subject to this limit shall only include indebtedness evidenced by bonds or notes and shall not include bonds described in section 53364.2(e) of the Act. The bonds for the CFD may be issued in one or more series and mature and bear interest at such rate or rates, payable semiannually or in such other manner, all as this City Council or its designee shall determine, at the time or times of sale of such bonds; provided, however, that the interest rate or rates shall not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by applicable law at the time of sale of the bonds and the bonds or any series thereof shall have a maximum term of not to exceed 40 years.

5. The proposition of the City incurring the bonds for the CFD as herein authorized shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the CFD and shall be consolidated with elections on the proposition of levying special taxes within the CFD and the establishment of an appropriations limit for the CFD pursuant to section 53353.5 of the Act. The time, place and further particulars and conditions of such election shall be as specified by separate resolution of this City Council. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
940

6. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED September 23, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
941
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITIES

DISTRICT

CITY OF STOCKTON
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1
(CANNERY PARK EAST)
Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the “Act”), this City Council has adopted a resolution titled “Resolution to Form a Community Facilities District and to Levy a Special Tax Therein to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Such District” (the “Resolution of Formation”), ordering the formation of the “City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East)” (the “CFD”), authorizing the levy of a special tax on property within the CFD and preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the CFD; and
This City Council has also adopted a resolution titled “Resolution Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness for a Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution Determining Necessity”), determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $15,000,000 upon the security of the facilities special tax to be levied within the CFD pursuant to the Act; and Pursuant to the provisions of the Resolution of Formation and the Resolution Determining Necessity, the propositions of the levy of the special tax, the establishment of the appropriations limit and the incurring of the bonded indebtedness shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the CFD as required by the provisions of the Act; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Pursuant to sections 53326, 53351, and 53325.7 of the Act, the issues of the levy of the special tax, the incurring of bonded indebtedness and the establishment of the appropriations limit shall be submitted to the qualified electors (as defined below) of the CFD at an election called therefor as provided below.

2. This Council hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory of the CFD for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearings heretofore conducted and concluded by this Council for the purposes of these proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, this Council finds that, for these proceedings, the qualified electors for the CFD are the 942
landowners within the CFD and that the vote shall be by such landowners or their authorized representatives, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the CFD not exempt from the special tax as of the close of the public hearings.

3. This Council hereby calls a special election in the CFD to consider the measures described in section 1 above, which election shall be held on September 23, 2025, and the results thereof canvassed at the meeting of this Council on September 23, 2025. The City Clerk is hereby designated as the official to conduct the election and to receive all ballots until 5:30 p.m. on the election date. It is hereby acknowledged that the City Clerk has on file the Resolution of Formation, a certified map of the boundaries of the CFD, and a sufficient description to allow the City Clerk to determine the electors of the CFD. Pursuant to section 53327 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by messenger or mail-delivered ballot pursuant to section 4000 of the California Elections Code, except as modified by waivers of the electors, and except that sections 53326 and 53327 of the Act shall govern for purposes of determining the date of election.

4. As authorized by section 53353.5 of the Act, the three propositions described in section 1 above shall be combined into a single ballot measure, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and by this reference incorporated herein and the form of ballot is hereby approved. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a ballot, in substantially the forms of Exhibit 1, to be delivered to each of the qualified electors of the CFD. Each ballot shall indicate the number of votes to be voted by the respective landowner to which the ballot pertains. This Council hereby finds that the provisions of section 53327 and 53327.5 of the Act requiring that each ballot be accompanied by all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and return of the ballot and the envelope to be used to return the ballot shall be enclosed with the ballot, return postage prepaid, and containing representations and requirements as to certain election procedures are for the protection of the qualified electors of the CFD and there is on file with the City Clerk a written waiver such procedures and requirements executed by all of the qualified electors of the CFD, all electors of which have requested formation of the CFD and levy of special taxes. Accordingly, this Council finds and determines that the qualified electors have been fully apprised of and have agreed to the conduct of the election without such procedures and requirements and have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings upon distribution and return of the ballots in the manner deemed appropriate by the City and all of the electors.

5. This Council hereby further finds that the provisions of section 53326 of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days following the adoption of the Resolution of Formation to elapse before the special election are for the protection of the qualified electors of the CFD. There is on file with the City Clerk a written waiver executed by all of the qualified electors of the CFD allowing for a shortening of the time for the special election to expedite the process of formation of the CFD and waiving any requirement for notice, analysis and arguments in connection with the election. Accordingly, this Council finds and determines that the qualified electors have been fully apprised of and have agreed to the shortened time for the election and waiver of analysis and 943
arguments, and have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings. This Council also finds and determines that the City Clerk has concurred in the shortened time for the election. Analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measures are hereby waived, as provided in section 53327 of the Act.

6. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed issuance of bonds and other debt for the CFD constitutes a “local bond measure” within the meaning of sections 53410, et seq. of the California Government Code. As a result, the bond measure shall include the propositions set forth above and the following: (a) the specific purpose of the bonds and other debt shall be as set forth in the propositions; (b) any proceeds received from the sale of any bonds and other debt shall be applied only to the purposes set forth in the propositions; (c) the proceeds of any bonds and other debt shall be deposited into special accounts to be created therefor as part of the issuance of the bonds and other debt; and (d) the City shall cause a report to be prepared annually under section 53411 of the Government Code.

Under section 50075.1 of the Government Code, the following accountability provisions shall apply to the special taxes: (a) the provision and/or acquisition of the Facilities, the payment of debt service on the bonds and other debt and the incidental costs thereof, all as defined in the Resolution of Formation, shall constitute the specific single purpose; (b) the proceeds of the special tax shall be applied only to the specific purposes identified in (a) above; (c) there shall be created special account(s) or funds(s) into which the proceeds shall be deposited; and (d) there shall be caused to be prepared an annual audit and report of the CFD.

7. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED September 23, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
944

CITY OF STOCKTON
Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East)

OFFICIAL BALLOT

SPECIAL TAX ELECTION
This ballot is for a special, landowner election. You must return this ballot to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Stockton no later than the hour of 5:30 p.m. on September 23, 2025, either by mail or in person. The City Clerk’s office is located at 425 N. El Dorado Street, Stockton, California 95202.

To vote, mark a cross (X) on the voting line after the word “YES” or after the word “NO”. All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing marks are forbidden and make the ballot void.

BALLOT MEASURE
Shall the measure pursuant to which (i) the City of Stockton shall incur indebtedness and issue bonds up to $15,000,000 on behalf of its Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) (“CFD”), to acquire and/or construct facilities set forth in the list of authorized facilities for the CFD attached to the resolution of formation and incorporated by this reference herein and pay for the costs of issuing the bonds and related expenses; (ii) a special tax for facilities shall be levied at a rate of up to $1,286 per Developed Property in Zone 1 and up to $,2386 per Developed Property in Zone 2, with other property types taxed at other rates, subject to annual escalation, through Fiscal Year 2058-29, raising $________ in Fiscal Year 2026-27 (assuming full build-out of the CFD), to pay for the principal and interest upon such bonds, to pay the costs of the City in administering the CFD, and to pay for the costs of acquiring and/or constructing said facilities in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the CFD attached to the resolution of formation and incorporated by this reference herein; and (iii) the annual appropriations limit of the CFD shall initially be $15,000,000, subject to escalation in accordance with applicable law, be adopted?
YES
________
NO
________
By execution in the space provided below, you also indicate your waiver of (i) the time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election, (ii) any requirement for analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, and (iii) any irregularity in the proceedings that may be claimed as a result of the application of such waivers.

Number of Votes: _________ Property Owner:
__________________,
A ___________________
By:

Name:

Title:

EXHIBIT 1 945
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR A

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF

SPECIAL TAX LIEN

CITY OF STOCKTON
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1
(CANNERY PARK EAST)
Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with section 53311, of the California Government Code (the “Act”), this City Council has adopted a resolution titled “Resolution to Form a Community Facilities District and to Levy a Special Tax Therein to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Such District” (the “Resolution of Formation”), ordering the formation of the “City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East)” (the “CFD”), authorizing the levy of special taxes on property within the CFD, and preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the CFD; and
This City Council has also adopted a resolution titled “Resolution Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness for a Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution of Necessity”), determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $15,000,000 upon the security of the special tax to be levied within the CFD pursuant to the Act; and Under the provisions of the Resolution of Formation, the Resolution of Necessity and a “Resolution Calling Special Election for a Community Facilities District” (the “Election Resolution”) adopted by this City Council with respect to the CFD, the propositions of the levy of the special tax, the establishment of the appropriations limit and the incurring of the bonded indebtedness were submitted to the qualified electors of the CFD as required by the provisions of the Act; and
Pursuant to the terms of the Election Resolution, which are by this reference incorporated herein, the special election has been held in the CFD and the City Clerk has on file a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election, (the “Canvass”) a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1; and
This City Council has reviewed the Canvass, finds it appropriate and wishes to complete its proceedings for the CFD; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:
946

1. The foregoing recitals are all true and correct.

2. The issues presented at the special election were the levy of a special tax within the CFD, the incurring of a bonded indebtedness for the CFD, and the approval of an annual appropriations limit for the CFD, all pursuant to the Resolution of Formation and the Resolution of Necessity.

3. The Council hereby approves the Canvass and finds that it shall be a permanent part of the record of its proceedings for the CFD. Pursuant to the Canvass, the issues presented at the special election were approved by the qualified electors of the CFD by more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast at the special election.

4. Pursuant to the voter approval, the CFD is hereby declared to be fully formed with the authority to levy the special taxes, to incur the approved bonded indebtedness and to have the established appropriations limit, all as heretofore provided in these proceedings and in the Act. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions taken by this City Council with respect to the CFD were valid and in conformity with the Act.

5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to complete, execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Joaquin a notice of special tax lien for the CFD in the form required by the Act, such recording to occur no later than fifteen (15) days following adoption by the Council of this resolution.

6. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED September 23, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
947

CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF ELECTION
City of Stockton
Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) I hereby certify that on September 23, 2025 I canvassed the returns of the election held on September 23, 2025 in the City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East) and the total number of ballots cast in said District and the total number of votes cast for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct:

Qualified
Landowner Votes
Votes Cast YES NO
City of Stockton Community Facilities
District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East),
Special Tax Election, Sept. 23, 2025 ___ ____ ____ ____ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this ______ day of _______, 2025.

By:

City Clerk
EXHIBIT 1 948
ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON LEVYING

SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN CITY OF STOCKTON COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1 (CANNERY PARK EAST)
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the “Act”), this City Council adopted a resolution titled “Resolution of Intention to Form a Community Facilities District and to Levy a Special Tax Therein to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Such District” (the “Resolution of Intention”), stating its intention to form the “City of Stockton Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East)” (the “CFD”); and
WHEREAS, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of this City Council to form the CFD, to provide for certain public facilities and to incur bonded indebtedness for the CFD; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025, this City Council has held noticed public hearings as required by the Act relative to (i) the determination to proceed with the formation of the CFD and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the CFD to finance a portion of the costs of the public facilities and (ii) the issuance of bonded indebtedness and other debt for the CFD; WHEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD and the levy of said special taxes were heard, substantial evidence was presented and considered by this City Council and a full and fair hearing was held;
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025, subsequent to the hearing, this City Council adopted its “Resolution to Form a Community Facilities District and to Levy a Special Tax Therein to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for Such District” (the “Resolution of Formation”), its “Resolution Determining Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness for a Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution Determining Necessity”) and its “Resolution Calling Special Election for a Community Facilities District” (the “Election Resolution”), which resolutions defined the public facilities to be financed by the CFD (the “Facilities”), established the CFD, authorized the levy of special taxes within the CFD, determined the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in the CFD and called an election within the CFD on the propositions of incurring indebtedness, levying special taxes, and establishing an appropriations limit within the CFD, respectively; and
949
2 WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025, a special election was held with respect to the CFD at which the eligible landowner-electors of the CFD approved such propositions by the two-thirds vote required by the Act; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, as follows:

Section 1. By the passage of this Ordinance this City Council hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the CFD pursuant to the Act. With respect to the CFD, the City shall levy the special taxes at the rate and in accordance with the formula set forth in the Resolution of Formation (as may be amended in the future, the “Rate and Method”), which Rate and Method is by this reference incorporated herein. The special taxes are hereby authorized to be levied commencing in fiscal year 2026-27 and in each fiscal year thereafter for the period provided in Rate and Method, as contemplated by the Resolution of Formation and the Resolution of Necessity, and all costs of administering the CFD.

Section 2. The Chief Financial Officer of the City (or his or her designee) is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to be levied for the next ensuing fiscal year for each parcel of real property within the CFD in the manner and as provided in the Resolution of Formation.

Section 3. Except as provided in the Rate and Method, properties or entities of the State, federal or local governments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes. In no event shall the special taxes be levied on any parcel within the CFD in excess of the maximum tax specified in the Resolution of Formation.

Section 4. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act and in the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the payment of principal and interest on bonds issued by the City for the CFD (the “Bonds”), the replenishment of the reserve fund for the Bonds, the payment of the costs of the Facilities, the payment of the costs of the City in administering the CFD, and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax.

Section 5. The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected and shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes; provided, however, that special taxes may be directly billed by the City and/or this City Council may provide for other appropriate methods of collection by resolutions of this City Council. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. The Finance Director of the City is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the auditor/tax collector of the County of San Joaquin in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be included on the secured property tax roll of the County of San Joaquin for fiscal year 2026-27 and for each fiscal 950
3 year thereafter until the Bonds are paid in full or such longer period of time provided in the Rate and Method.

Section 6. If for any reason any portion of this Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the CFD, by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the CFD shall not be affected.

Section 7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City.

Section 8. Pursuant to Section 508 of the Charter of the City, this Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage by the City Council.

ADOPTED: ____________________
EFFECTIVE: ____________________

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
951
City of Stockton
CFD No. 2025-1
(Cannery Park East)
Resolution of Formation Meeting
City Council Meeting
September 23, 2025
Agenda Item 15.1
952
Background
CFD No. 2019-1 (Cannery Park II) formed in May 2019
 Fixed annual special tax of $1,600 per year on
single-family residential units
 City can recover administrative costs as part of the
special taxes
 A services tax is also paid each year by the property owners
 Total bonded indebtedness of $15 million
 Issued two series of bonds in 2022 ($9.915 million)
and 2024 ($1.525 million)
2 953
The Proposed Project
 The initial boundary of the CFD will include just the portion of property originally acquired by Jen California 31, LLC (the “Developer”).
 The portion acquired is already in CFD No. 2019-1 (Cannery Park II).

The special taxes payable by the property owners will be in addition to the fixed $1,600 per year of facilities special tax and the services special tax already collected from CFD No. 2019-1.  The CFD will consist of 311 single-family residential units  The Developer sold 64 lots to Richmond American on October 25, 2024  The Developer sold 267 lots to Century Communities on May 19, 2025.  If formed, the CFD will help fund the acquisition of authorized facilities and the payment of fees.
 FY 2026-27 Facilities tax rates ranging from $922 (<1,800 SF) to $2,386 (>3,400 SF) annually
 2% escalation of facilities tax
 Total tax rate of 1.80% consistent with other CFDs in the region 3 954
Proposed Boundary 4
955
Financial Summary
There is no financial impact to the City for the
formation of the proposed CFD
 The estimate cost to form the CFD is $39,500. Expenses for the Special Tax Consultant (Willdan Financial Services), Bond Counsel (Jones Hall) and the City’s Municipal Advisor (Del Rio Advisors, LLC) are included in the estimated cost. The
Developer has deposited $39,500 with the City to cover these estimated costs of formation.
 Ultimately, when bonds are issued, the City will receive an administrative fee based on a sliding scale of the issuance size.

The City’s Administration Fee is a component of the cost of issuance and is paid from bond proceeds.

If the CFD is approved and when one or more series of
bonds are contemplated, the bonds will be brought
back to the City Council for consideration and approval  The bonds will not be a debt of the City and will only be paid through the special taxes levied in the CFD.
5 956
Items for Consideration
Staff recommends the City Council approve the
following four resolutions:
 A resolution of formation establishing Community
Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Cannery Park East)
authorizing the levy of a special tax within the CFD and establishing an appropriations limit for the CFD.
 A resolution determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000.
 A resolution calling for an election for the purpose of submitting the levy of the special tax and the
establishment of the appropriations limit to the qualified electors of the CFD.
 A resolution declaring the results of the election and directing the recording of a notice of special tax lien.

Staff also recommends the City Council adopt an ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax within the CFD
6 957
Questions ?
7 958
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0945, Version: 1
PUBLIC HEARING TO ACCEPT THE 2025 WATER QUALITY PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct a Public Hearing to accept and respond to public comments on the 2025 Water Quality Public Health Goals Report (2025 Report).

2. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, adopt a resolution accepting the 2025 Report.

It is also recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

Summary
The Municipal Utilities Department (MUD) is comprised of three enterprise funds including Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Utilities. The Water Utility provides drinking water service to the northern and southern regions of the Stockton Metropolitan Area, with the California Water Service Company and San Joaquin County serving the central region. The Delta Water Treatment Plant (DWTP) began operation in May 2012, providing up to 30 million gallons per day of treated surface water from the San Joaquin Delta and Mokelumne River.

The California Health and Safety Code requires public water systems to prepare a public health goals report every three years that compares the concentration of drinking water constituents with their respective Public Health or Maximum Contaminant Level Goals.

Accordingly, staff prepared the 2025 Report (Exhibit 1 to the Resolution), which concludes the potable water supplied to the City’s water service area meets all State and Federal drinking water standards set to protect public health. The California Health and Safety Code requires that the 2025 Report be accepted by the City Council at a public hearing and be available to the public for review.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Public Health Goals Report is unique to the State of California. Section 116470(b) of the California Health and Safety Code requires public water systems with more than 10,000 service connections to regularly develop this report. The City’s water service area supplies potable water to more than 10,000 service connections and is required to complete a Public Health Goals Report every three years.

City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
959
File #: 25-0945, Version: 1
The 2025 Report compares the concentrations of drinking water constituents with their respective California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Public Health Goals (PHGs) or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs). These goals are based on the concentration of a specific contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health.

The 2025 Report identifies the number of sources that have constituents above their respective PHGs or MCLGs. In addition, the 2025 Report includes available water treatment technologies and estimated costs to reduce constituents below the PHGs or MCLGs.

The PHGs and MCLGs are not enforceable by the State or Federal agencies as they are lower than currently regulated Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) requirements. Adopted MCLs for water quality criteria are the enforceable standard for compliance in all water systems throughout the United States. Public water systems are required to prepare Water Exceedance Reports and Notification Requirements if one or more constituents are detected in the water supply that exceed an MCL. The MUD has not detected any constituent in the City of Stockton water service area that exceed their MCL.

Present Situation
The 2025 Report lists constituents detected in the City water system above PHGs and/or MCLGs during calendar years 2022 through 2024. These constituents include the following:
⦁ Arsenic - naturally occurs in local groundwater
1 Bromate - bromide is a precursor found in oceanwater & other sources 2 Uranium - occurs in local groundwater
⦁ Gross Alpha
1 Radium-228
⦁ Total Coliform - indicator test for E. coli
The detection levels for all constituents were below the established MCLs. The City water system complies with the regulatory MCL standards.

The estimated cost to construct and maintain treatment facilities to lower constituents below PHGs and MCLGs levels is $1,932 per service connection per year. However, the effectiveness of the treatment technologies to provide significant reductions in constituent levels at these already below MCL values is uncertain. The protection of public health and the possible benefits of these further reductions are not substantiated and may not be quantifiable.

The 2025 Report concludes that City water meets all State of California, Department of Public Health, and United States Environmental Protection Agency drinking water quality standards set to protect public health.

The 2025 Report is required to be accepted by the City Council at a Public Hearing scheduled after July 1 and made available to the public for review. The 2025 Report is available on the City website at www.stocktonca.gov/waterquality <http://www.stocktonca.gov/waterquality>. The Public Hearing was noticed in The Record on August 21, 2025.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
960
File #: 25-0945, Version: 1

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The FY 2025-26 Annual Budget includes appropriation to cover the costs for a Public Hearing notice in The Record and for printing copies of the 2025 Public Health Goals in the Water Fund, Administration Division.

This action has no impact on the General Fund or any other unrestricted funds.

City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
961
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2025 WATER QUALITY PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS REPORT
Section 116470(b) of the California Health and Safety Code requires public water systems to prepare a report every three years that compares the levels of drinking water constituents with their respective Public Health Goals (PHGs) or Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs); and
A PHG (or MCLG) is the level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are established by the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). MCLGs are established by the USEPA; and The PHG Report identifies the number of sources that have constituents above their respective PHGs or MCLGs. The PHG Report also provides an estimated cost to reduce the concentration of those constituents to levels at or below their respective PHGs or MCLGs; and
The 2025 Report on Water Quality Public Health Goals (2025 Report) lists constituents detected in the City water system above PHGs and/or MCLGs during calendar years 2022, 2023, and 2024. These constituents include the following:
 Arsenic – naturally occurs in local groundwater
 Bromate – bromide is precursor found in seawater and other sources  Uranium – occurs in local groundwater
o Gross Alpha
o Radium-228
 Total Coliform – indicator test for E. coli; and
The PHGs and MCLGs are not enforceable by the State or Federal agencies as they are lower than currently regulated Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) requirements; and
The City water system complies with the regulatory MCL standards; and The 2025 Report concludes that City water meets all State of California, Department of Public Health, and United States Environmental Protection Agency drinking water quality standards set to protect public health; and On September 23, 2025, the City held a duly noticed public hearing to accept and respond to public comments on the 2025 Report; now, therefore, 962

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Approve and accept the 2025 Report on Water Quality Public Health Goals, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference.

2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to take whatever actions are appropriate and necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED September 23, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
963
Report on Water Quality
Relative
to Public Health
Goals
June 2025

CITY OF STOCKTON
Q ,

MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 1 964

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
EXHIBIT 1 965

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................... 3 PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS....................................................................................................... 3 CITY OF STOCKTON WATER SOURCES............................................................................. 4 WATER QUALITY DATA CONSIDERED................................................................................ 4 GUIDELINES FOLLOWED...................................................................................................... 4 BEST AVAILABLE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY AND COST ESTIMATES.......................... 4

CONTAMINANTS DETECTED THAT EXCEED A PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS OR MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL GOALS............................................................................................. 4 Arsenic ........................................................................................................................ 5 Bromate....................................................................................................................... 6 Radionuclides.............................................................................................................. 6 Gross Alpha............................................................................................................ 7 Radium-228............................................................................................................ 7 Uranium.................................................................................................................. 8 Total Coliforms ............................................................................................................ 9 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION ................................................................ 10

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - MCLs, DLRs and PHGs for Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants APPENDIX B - Health Risk Information for Public Health Goal Exceedance Reports APPENDIX C - Cost Estimates for Treatment for Treatment Technologies EXHIBIT 1 966

CITY OF STOCKTON WATER SYSTEM

REPORT ON WATER QUALITY

RELATIVE TO PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS
June 2025

BACKGROUND
Provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 116470(b) require that public water systems serving more than 10,000 service connections prepare a brief, written report by July 1, 2025 that provides information on water quality levels from the three previous years that exceeded any Public Health Goals (PHGs), published by the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). The law also requires that where OEHHA has not adopted a PHG for a contaminant, water suppliers are to use the Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Only contaminants in a water system which have a level exceeding a PHG or MCLG are addressed in this report.

This report provides the following information as specified in the California Health and Safety Code Section 116470(b) for any contaminant detected in the City's water supply between 2022 and 2024 at a level exceeding a PHG or MCLG:
• Numerical public health risk associated with the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), and the PHG or MCLG,
• Category or type of risk to health that could be associated with each contaminant level, • Best Available Treatment Technology that could be used to reduce the contaminant level, and
• Estimate of the cost to install that treatment.

PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS
PHGs are set by the California OEHHA and are based solely on public health risk considerations. None of the practical risk management factors that are considered by the USEPA or the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Division of Drinking Water (DDW) in setting drinking water standards are considered in setting the PHGs. These factors include analytical detection capability, treatment technology available, benefits, and costs. PHGs are not enforceable and are not required to be met by any public water system.

MCLGs are the federal equivalent to PHGs. Appendix A lists the regulated contaminants for which PHGs and MCLGs have been set.

EXHIBIT 1 967

CITY OF STOCKTON WATER SOURCES
Most of the City’s drinking water is treated surface water produced through the Delta Water Treatment Plant (DWTP) or purchased from the Stockton East Water District (SEWD). Water is diverted from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, and Mokelumne River water is purchased from Woodbridge Irrigation District for treatment at the City’s DWTP. SEWD imports surface water from New Melones and New Hogan Reservoirs for treatment and delivery to the City.

The City of Stockton’s water supply also consists of groundwater sources.

WATER QUALITY DATA CONSIDERED
All water quality data collected from the City’s treated surface water and groundwater between 2022 and 2024 for purposes of determining compliance with drinking water standards were considered for this report. In addition, water quality data from SEWD is also considered for this report. This data is summarized in the 2022, 2023, and 2024 annual Drinking Water Quality Reports (i.e., Consumer Confidence Reports) which are available on the City’s website. Copies of these reports may be viewed at the following location:
https://cms3.revize.com/revize/stockton/Documents/Services/Water,%20Sewer%20&%20St ormwater/Water/Water%20Quality/ccr.pdf

GUIDELINES FOLLOWED
Suggested Guidelines for Preparation of Required Reports on Public Health Goals (PHGs) to satisfy requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 116470(b) by the Association of California Water Agencies was used in the preparation of this report.

PHGs, MCLGs and DLRs
PHGs are based solely on public health risk considerations. They represent the level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected significant risk to health. None of the practical risk-management factors that are considered by the DDW or USEPA in setting drinking water MCLs are considered in setting PHGs. These factors include analytical detection capability, available treatment technologies, and benefits and costs of operating the treatment. MCLGs are the federal equivalent to PHGs, however, in cases where a contaminant is a known or suspected carcinogen, the MCLG is set to zero. PHGs and MCLGs are not enforceable and are not required to be met by any public water systems. A constituent’s DLR (Detection Limits for Purposes of Reporting) is the designated minimum level at or above which any analytical result for drinking water must be reported to DDW. PHG report guidance recommends considering results that are above their PHG or MCLG and less than their DLR to be zero. A list published by DDW of regulated constituents with the MCLs, DLRs and PHGs for Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants is included as Attachment 2.

BEST AVAILABLE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY AND COST ESTIMATES
Both the USEPA and SWRCB adopt Best Available Technologies (BATs) which are the bestknown methods of reducing contaminant levels to the MCL. Costs can be estimated for such technologies. However, since many PHGs and all MCLGs are set much lower than the MCL, it is not always possible, nor feasible, to determine what treatment is needed to further reduce a contaminant to or near the PHG or MCLG, many of which are set at zero. Estimating the costs to reduce a contaminant to zero is difficult, if not impossible and costly. In some cases, installing treatment to try and further reduce to very low levels of one contaminant may have adverse EXHIBIT 1 968
effects on other aspects of water quality.1

CONTAMINANTS DETECTED THAT EXCEED A PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS OR MAXIMUM

CONTAMINANT LEVEL GOALS
The following is a discussion of contaminants that were detected in one or more of our drinking water sources at levels above the PHG, or if no PHG, above the MCLG. This report only provides information on contaminants that were found in the City’s drinking water system to have exceeded established PHG or MCLG. The City of Stockton consistently delivers safe water at the lowest possible cost to our customers. The levels of these contaminants were well below the MCLs, so this does not constitute a violation of drinking water regulations or indicate the water was unsafe to drink. These results could be considered typical for a California water agency. The health risk information for regulated contaminants with PHGs are provided in Appendix B.

Arsenic
The PHG for arsenic is 0.004 µg/L, and United States Environmental Protection Agency and State of California MCL is 10 µg/L. Arsenic is a naturally occurring element and is widely present in the environment. In certain geographical areas, natural mineral deposits may contain large quantities of arsenic and this may result in higher levels of arsenic in water. The main commercial use of arsenic in the United States is pesticides and in wood preservatives.

In humans, while ingestion of larger doses of arsenic may be lethal, lower levels of exposure may cause a variety of systemic effects including irritation of the digestive tract, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. In addition, arsenic ingestion can increase the risk of cancer in the digestive system, lungs, heart, and skin. The duration of arsenic exposure appears to be a key factor in determining the extent of the toxic effects.

The City of Stockton is required to monitor each of its drinking water wells for arsenic at least once every three years. In sampling conducted in 2022, 2023 and 2024, nine (9) samples were collected from a total of nine (9) active well sites. Arsenic values ranged from 2 µg/L to a maximum of 6.4 µg/L, with an average concentration of 4.5 µg/L over the three-year span. The MCL is 10 µg/L on a quarterly running average.

Samples collected from SEWD treated surface water had no detections of arsenic.

Health Risk Category
The health risk category for arsenic is carcinogenicity. People who drink water containing arsenic above the MCL throughout their lifetime could experience an increased risk of getting cancer.

Numerical Health Risk at MCLG
The numerical health risk for arsenic based on the PHG is 1 x 10-6. This means one excess cancer case per million people exposed.
1 The estimated service connection costs were derived from adjusting the 2022 Public Health Goals Report’s estimated service connection costs with respects to the Updated 2012 ACWA Cost of Treatment Table (Attachment A, Table 3).

EXHIBIT 1 969
Best Available Technologies and Treatment Costs
The BAT to lower the level of arsenic below the MCL is the addition of ion exchange treatment units. The estimated annual cost to install and operate ion exchange treatment units at 9 of the City’s wells to reduce arsenic levels to below the PHG would be approximately $0.82 per 1,000 gallons of water treated, which includes annualized cost of construction, plus operation and maintenance costs. This translates into an additional annual cost of approximately $248 per service connection per year for the life of the treatment system.

Bromate
The PHG for bromate is 1 µg/L and MCL is 10 µg/L calculated on a quarterly running average.

Bromate is formed when naturally occurring bromide reacts with ozone in the surface water treatment process. The City uses ozone in the treatment process at the Delta Water Supply Treatment Plant.

In sampling conducted at the DWTP from 2022 to 2024, a total of thirty-six (36) samples were collected. Bromate values ranged from <5 µg/L to 24 µg/L with an average of <6.1 µg/L over the three-year span. The City is complying of the MCL, as the quarterly running average is below 10 µg/L.

Health Risk Category
The health risk category for bromate is carcinogenicity. People who drink water containing bromate above the MCL throughout their lifetime could experience an increased risk of getting cancer.

Numerical Health Risk at MCLG
The numerical health risk for bromate based on the PHG is 1 x 10-6. This means one excess cancer case per million people exposed.

Best Available Technologies and Treatment Costs
The BAT to lower the level of bromate below the MCL is the addition of granular activated carbon treatment units. The estimated annual cost to install and operate a granular activated carbon treatment unit at the Delta Water Supply Treatment Plant to reduce bromate levels to below the PHG would be approximately $0.77 per 1,000 gallons of water treated, which includes annualized cost of construction, plus operation and maintenance costs. This translates into an additional annual cost of approximately $174 per service connection per year for the life of the treatment system, assuming the treatment plant operates 365 days of the year.

Radionuclides
Many naturally occurring substances and a few man-made ones have the potential to emit ionizing radiation, and therefore, are referred to as radioactive. Of the radionuclides that have been observed in drinking water, most are naturally occurring. The naturally occurring contaminant of greatest concern in drinking water is uranium. Most of the naturally occurring radionuclides are alpha particle emitters.

Contamination by man-made nuclear materials can also occur. The man-made radionuclides, which are primarily beta and photon emitters, are produced by several activities that involve EXHIBIT 1 970
the use of concentrated radioactive materials. These include production of electricity; nuclear medicines used in therapy and diagnosis; and various commercial products such as, televisions and smoke detectors. The City of Stockton is only required to monitor its groundwater and surface water supplies for naturally occurring radionuclides.

Exposure to radionuclides from drinking water results in an increased risk of cancer. In addition to cancer, exposure to uranium has the potential to cause kidney damage. In California, the radionuclides currently regulated in drinking water are gross alpha particle activity, radium 226, radium 228, uranium, and beta and photon emitters. The City detected Gross Alpha Particles, Radium-228, and Uranium above the PHG or MCLG but well under the MCL.

Gross Alpha Particles

Radionuclides such as gross alpha particles in water supplies are predominantly from erosion of natural deposits. The term radionuclide refers to naturally occurring elemental radium, radon, uranium, and thorium with unstable atomic nuclei that spontaneously decay, producing ionizing radiation. Gross alpha is defined as the sum total of these radionuclides. The MCL for gross alpha is 15 picocuries per liter of water (pCi/L) and the MCLG is 0 pCi/L.

The City collected and analyzed samples for gross alpha particles during 2022-2024, with values that ranged from 1.50 pCi/L to 5.13 pCi/L, with an average value of 4.17 pCi/L, all sample results were below the MCL.

Health Risk Category
The category of health risk for gross alpha particles is carcinogenicity chronic toxicity.

Carcinogenic risk means capable of producing cancer. Chronic toxicity means that adverse effects may develop gradually from low levels of exposure over a long period of time.

Numerical Health Risk at MCLG
The numerical health risk based on USEA’s MCLG is zero therefore the cancer risk is zero.

Best Available Technologies and Treatment Costs
The best available technology (BAT) to lower the level of these compounds below the PHG is reverse osmosis. Since the levels are already below the MCL, reverse osmosis would be required to attempt to lower the levels to below the PHG. Please note that accurate cost estimates are difficult, if not impossible, and are highly speculative and theoretical. The estimated annual cost to install and operate reverse osmosis system at 13 of the City’s wells to reduce uranium levels to below the PHG would be approximately $5.31 per 1,000 gallons of water treated, which includes annualized cost of construction, plus operation and maintenance costs. This translates into an additional annual cost of approximately $1510 per service connection per year for the life of the treatment system.

Radium-228
Radium-228 is a naturally occurring radioactive element present in geological formations and the earth’s crust. It is introduced into groundwater and surface water through erosion. The MCL for Radium-228 is a combined total of Radium-226 + Radium-228 is 5 pCi/L and the PHG for Radium-228 is 0.019 pCi/L.

EXHIBIT 1 971
The City collected and analyzed samples for Radium-228 during 2022-2024, with values that ranged from ND to 1.71 pCi/L, with an average result of 0.50 pCi/L, with all samples below the MCL.

Health Risk Category
The category of health risk for uranium is carcinogenicity chronic toxicity (kidneys).

Carcinogenic risk means capable of producing cancer. Chronic toxicity means that adverse effects may develop gradually from low levels of exposure over a long period of time.

Numerical Health Risk at MCLG
The numerical health risk for Radium-228 based on the PHG is 1 x 10-6. This means one excess cancer case per million people exposed.

Best Available Technologies and Treatment Costs
The best available technology (BAT) to lower the level of these compounds below the PHG is reverse osmosis. Since the levels are already below the MCL, reverse osmosis would be required to attempt to lower the levels to below the PHG. Please note that accurate cost estimates are difficult, if not impossible, and are highly speculative and theoretical. The estimated annual cost to install and operate reverse osmosis system at 2 of the City’s wells to reduce uranium levels to below the PHG would be approximately $5.31 per 1,000 gallons of water treated, which includes annualized cost of construction, plus operation and maintenance costs. This translates into an additional annual cost of approximately $233 per service connection per year for the life of the treatment system.

Uranium
Uranium is a naturally occurring radioactive element present in geological formations and the earth’s crust. It is introduced into groundwater and surface water through erosion. The MCL for uranium is 20 pCi/L and the PHG for uranium is 0.43 pCi/L.

The City collected and analyzed samples for uranium during 2022-2024, with values that ranged from 1.03 pCi/L to 5.80 pCi/L, there were 4 detections above the PHG with an average of 3.93 pCi/L, with all samples below the MCL.

Health Risk Category
The category of health risk for uranium is carcinogenicity chronic toxicity (kidneys).

Carcinogenic risk means capable of producing cancer. Chronic toxicity means that adverse effects may develop gradually from low levels of exposure over a long period of time.

Numerical Health Risk at MCLG
The numerical health risk for uranium based on the PHG is 1 x 10-6. This means one excess cancer case per million people exposed.

Best Available Technologies and Treatment Costs
The best available technology (BAT) to lower the level of these compounds below the PHG is reverse osmosis. Since the levels are already below the MCL, reverse osmosis would be required to attempt to lower the levels to below the PHG. Please note that accurate cost estimates are difficult, if not impossible, and are highly speculative and theoretical. The EXHIBIT 1 972
estimated annual cost to install and operate reverse osmosis system at 4 of the City’s wells to reduce uranium levels to below the PHG would be approximately $5.31 per 1,000 gallons of water treated, which includes annualized cost of construction, plus operation and maintenance costs. This translates into an additional annual cost of approximately $466 per service connection per year for the life of the treatment system.

Total Coliform Bacteria
Total coliform bacteria are tested at sampling sites throughout the City’s water distribution system. No more than 5% of all samples collected in a month can be positive for total coliforms in order to comply with the MCL. Although there is no PHG for total coliform bacteria, the MCLG is 0% positive samples. The reason for the total coliform drinking water standard is to minimize the possibility of the water containing pathogens, which are organisms that cause waterborne diseases. Because total coliform analysis is only a surrogate indicator of the potential presence of pathogens, it is not possible to state a specific numerical health risk. While USEPA normally sets MCLGs “at a level where no known or anticipated adverse effects on persons would occur,” the USEPA indicates that this is not possible with totalcoliforms.

Coliform bacteria are an indicator organism that are ubiquitous in nature and are not generally considered harmful. They are used because of the ease in monitoring and analysis. If a positive sample is found, it indicates a potential problem that needs to be investigated and additional sampling is warranted. It is not at all unusual for a system to have an occasional positive coliform bacteria sample. It is difficult, if not impossible; to assure that a system will never get a positive sample.

During 2022, 2023 and 2024, between 145 and 186 samples were collected each month for coliform analyses. Occasionally, a sample(s) is found to be positive for coliform bacteria. Repeat samples for sites having positive coliform bacteria were taken as a follow-up, and in every case, the repeat samples were negative.

The City provides chlorine disinfection to ensure that the water served is microbiologically safe.

The chlorine residual levels are carefully controlled to provide the best health protection without causing the water to have undesirable taste and odor or increasing the level of certain compounds. This careful balance of treatment processes is essential to supplying our customers with safe drinking water.

Other equally important measures that we have implemented include: an effective crossconnection and backflow control programs; an effective monitoring and surveillance program; and maintaining positive pressures in our distribution system. The system has already taken all the steps described by DDW as “Best Available Technology” for coliform bacteria, which is regulated in Title 22, CCR, Section 64447.

EXHIBIT 1 973

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION
The City of Stockton’s drinking water quality for the contaminants discussed in this 2025 Public Health Goals Report meet all State Water Resources Control Board and USEPA drinking water standards set to protect public health. To further reduce the levels of the contaminants identified in this report that are already significantly below the health-based maximum contaminant levels established to provide “safe drinking water”, additional costly treatment processes at City water wells and DWTP would be required. The effectiveness of the treatment processes to provide any significant reductions in contaminant levels at these already low values is uncertain. The health protection benefits of these further hypothetical reductions are not at all clear and may not be quantifiable. Therefore, no action is proposed at this time.

EXHIBIT 1 974

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
EXHIBIT 1 975
1 APPENDIX A
MCLs, DLRs and PHGs for Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants EXHIBIT 1 976
2025 PHG Triennial Report: Calendar Years 2022-2023-2024 MCLs, DLRs, and PHGs for Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants (Units are in milligrams per liter (mg/L), unless otherwise noted.) Last Update: September 14, 2021
(Reference last update 9/14/2021:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/documents/mclreview/mcls_dlrs_phgs.pdf) This table includes:
● DDW's maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)
● DDW's detection limits for purposes of reporting (DLRs) ● Public health goals (PHGs) from the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) ● PHGs for NDMA and 1,2,3-Trichloropropane (both are unregulated) are at the bottom of this table ● The federal MCLG for chemicals without a PHG, microbial contaminants, and the DLR for 1,2,3-TCP Constituent MCL DLR PHG or (MCLG) Date of PHG
Chemicals with MCLs in 22 CCR §64431 —Inorganic Chemicals Aluminum 1 0.05 0.6 2001
Antimony 0.006 0.006 0.02 1997
Antimony -- -- 0.001 2016
Arsenic 0.010 0.002 0.000004 2004
Asbestos (MFL = million fibers per liter; for fibers
>10 microns long) 7 MFL 0.2 MFL 7 MFL 2003
Barium 1 0.1 2 2003
Beryllium 0.004 0.001 0.001 2003
Cadmium 0.005 0.001 0.00004 2006
Chromium, Total - OEHHA withdrew the 1999

0.0025 mg/L PHG in Nov 2001 0.05 0.01 (0.100) 1999
Chromium, Hexavalent (Chromium-6) 0.01 0.001 0.00002 2011 Cyanide 0.15 0.1 0.15 1997
Fluoride 2 0.1 1 1997
Mercury (inorganic) 0.002 0.001 0.0012 1999 (rev2005)*
Nickel 0.1 0.01 0.012 2001
Nitrate (as N) 10 as N 0.4 45 as NO3
(=10 as N) 2018
Nitrite (as N) 1 as N 0.4 1 as N 2018
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 10 as N -- 10 as N 2018
Perchlorate 0.006 0.002 0.001 2015
Selenium 0.05 0.005 0.03 2010
Thallium 0.002 0.001 0.0001 1999 (rev2004)
Copper and Lead, 22 CCR §64672.3
Values referred to as MCLs for lead and copper are not actually MCLs; instead, they are called "Action Levels" under the lead and copper rule
Copper 1.3 0.05 0.3 2008
Lead 0.015 0.005 0.0002 2009
EXHIBIT 1 977
Constituent MCL DLR PHG or (MCLG) Date of PHG
Radionuclides with MCLs in 22 CCR §64441 and §64443 —Radioactivity [units are picocuries per liter (pCi/L), unless otherwise stated; n/a = not applicable] Gross alpha particle activity - OEHHA concluded
in 2003 that a PHG was not practical 15 3 none n/a
Gross beta particle activity - OEHHA concluded
in 2003 that a PHG was not practical 4 mrem/yr 4 none n/a Radium-226 -- 1 0.05 2006
Radium-228 -- 1 0.019 2006
Radium-226 + Radium-228 5 -- -- --
Strontium-90 8 2 0.35 2006
Tritium 20,000 1,000 400 2006
Uranium 20 1 0.43 2001
Chemicals with MCLs in 22 CCR §64444 —Organic Chemicals (a) Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs)
Benzene 0.001 0.0005 0.00015 2001
Carbon tetrachloride 0.0005 0.0005 0.0001 2000
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.6 0.0005 0.6 1997 (rev2009)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p-DCB) 0.005 0.0005 0.006 1997
1,1-Dichloroethane (1,1-DCA) 0.005 0.0005 0.003 2003
1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) 0.0005 0.0005 0.0004 1999 (rev2005) 1,1-Dichloroethylene (1,1-DCE) 0.006 0.0005 0.01 1999
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.006 0.0005 0.013 2018
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.01 0.0005 0.05 2018
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) 0.005 0.0005 0.004 2000 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.005 0.0005 0.0005 1999
1,3-Dichloropropene 0.0005 0.0005 0.0002 1999 (rev2006) Ethylbenzene 0.3 0.0005 0.3 1997
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) 0.013 0.003 0.013 1999 Monochlorobenzene 0.07 0.0005 0.07 2014
Styrene 0.1 0.0005 0.0005 2010
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.001 0.0005 0.0001 2003
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 0.005 0.0005 0.00006 2001
Toluene 0.15 0.0005 0.15 1999
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.005 0.0005 0.005 1999
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA) 0.200 0.0005 1 2006
1,1,2-Trichloroethane (1,1,2-TCA) 0.005 0.0005 0.0003 2006 Trichloroethylene (TCE) 0.005 0.0005 0.0017 2009
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) 0.15 0.005 1.3 2014
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113) 1.2 0.01 4 1997 (rev2011) Vinyl chloride 0.0005 0.0005 0.00005 2000
Xylenes 1.75 0.0005 1.8 1997
EXHIBIT 1 978
Constituent MCL DLR PHG or (MCLG) Date of PHG
(b) Non-Volatile Synthetic Organic Chemicals (SOCs)
Alachlor 0.002 0.001 0.004 1997
Atrazine 0.001 0.0005 0.00015 1999
Bentazon 0.018 0.002 0.2 1999 (rev2009)
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.0002 0.0001 0.000007 2010
Carbofuran 0.018 0.005 0.0017 2000
Carbofuran -- -- 0.0007 2016
Chlordane 0.0001 0.0001 0.00003 1997 (rev2006)
Dalapon 0.2 0.01 0.79 1997 (rev2009)
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) 0.0002 0.00001 0.000003 2020 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) 0.07 0.01 0.02 2009 Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 0.4 0.005 0.2 2003
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) 0.004 0.003 0.012 1997 Dinoseb 0.007 0.002 0.014 1997 (rev2010)
Diquat 0.02 0.004 0.015 2000
Diquat -- -- 0.006 2016
Endrin 0.002 0.0001 0.0018 1999 (rev2008)
Endrin -- -- 0.0003 2016
Endothal 0.1 0.045 0.094 2014
Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 0.00005 0.00002 0.00001 2003
Glyphosate 0.7 0.025 0.9 2007
Heptachlor 0.00001 0.00001 0.000008 1999
Heptachlor epoxide 0.00001 0.00001 0.000006 1999
Hexachlorobenzene 0.001 0.0005 0.00003 2003
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.05 0.001 0.002 2014
Lindane 0.0002 0.0002 0.000032 1999 (rev2005)
Methoxychlor 0.03 0.01 0.00009 2010
Molinate 0.02 0.002 0.001 2008
Oxamyl 0.05 0.02 0.026 2009
Pentachlorophenol 0.001 0.0002 0.0003 2009
Picloram 0.5 0.001 0.5 1997
Picloram -- -- 0.166 2016
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.0005 0.0005 0.00009 2007 Simazine 0.004 0.001 0.004 2001
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.05 0.001 0.003 2014
2,3,7,8-TCDD (dioxin) 3x10-8 5x10-9 5x10-11 2010
Thiobencarb 0.07 0.001 0.07 2000
Thiobencarb -- -- 0.042 2016
Toxaphene 0.003 0.001 0.00003 2003
EXHIBIT 1 979
Constituent MCL DLR PHG or (MCLG) Date of PHG
Chemicals with MCLs in 22 CCR §64533 —Disinfection Byproducts Total Trihalomethanes 0.080 --
Total Trihalomethanes -- -- 0.0008 2010 draft
Bromodichloromethane -- 0.0010 0.00006 2020
Bromoform -- 0.0010 0.0005 2020
Chloroform -- 0.0010 0.0004 2020
Dibromochloromethane -- 0.0010 0.0001 2020
Haloacetic Acids (five) (HAA5) 0.060 -- -- --
Monochloroacetic Acid -- 0.0020 -- --
Dichloroacetic Adic -- 0.0010 -- --
Trichloroacetic Acid -- 0.0010 -- --
Monobromoacetic Acid -- 0.0010 -- --
Dibromoacetic Acid -- 0.0010 -- --
Bromate 0.010 0.0050 or 0.0010a 0.0001 2009
Chlorite 1.0 0.020 0.05 2009
Microbiological Contaminants (TT = Treatment Technique) Coliform % positive samples % 5 (zero)
Cryptosporidium** TT (zero)
Giardia lamblia** TT (zero)
Legionella** TT (zero)
Viruses** TT (zero)
Chemicals with PHGs established in response to DDW requests. These are not currently regulated drinking water contaminants.

N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) -- -- 0.000003 2006
1,2,3-Trichloropropane -- 0.000005 0.0000007 2009
Notes:
a DDW will maintain a 0.0050 mg/L DLR for bromate to accommodate laboratories that are using EPA Method 300.1. However, laboratories using EPA Methods 317.0 Revision 2.0, 321.8, or 326.0 must meet a 0.0010 mg/L MRL for bromate and should report results with a DLR of 0.0010 mg/L per Federal requirements. *OEHHA's review of this chemical during the year indicated (rev20XX) resulted in no change in the PHG ** Surface water treatment = TT
EXHIBIT 1 980

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
EXHIBIT 1 981
1 APPENDIX B
Health Risk Information for Public Health Goal Exceedance Reports EXHIBIT 1 982
Health Risk Information for Public Health Goal Exceedance Reports Prepared by
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
California Environmental Protection Agency
February 2025
NEW for the 2025 Report: New in this document are newly established Public Health Goals (PHGs) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), and five haloacetic acids: monochloroacetic acid, dichloroacetic acid, trichloroacetic acid, monobromoacetic acid, and dibromoacetic acid.

Background: Under the Calderon-Sher Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996 (the Act), public water systems with more than 10,000 service connections are required to prepare a report every three years for contaminants that exceed their respective PHGs.1 This document contains health risk information on drinking water contaminants to assist public water systems in preparing these reports. A PHG is the concentration of a contaminant in drinking water that poses no significant health risk if consumed for a lifetime. PHGs are developed and published by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) using current risk assessment principles, practices and methods.2
The water system's report is required to identify the health risk category (e.g., carcinogenicity or neurotoxicity) associated with exposure to each contaminant in drinking water that has a PHG and to include a brief, plainly worded description of these risks. The report is also required to disclose the numerical public health risk, if available, associated with the California Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and with the PHG for each contaminant. This health risk information document is prepared by OEHHA every three years to assist the water systems in providing the required information in their reports.
1 Health and Safety Code Section 116470(b)
EXHIBIT 1 983
2 Health and Safety Code Section 116365
EXHIBIT 1 984
Numerical health risks: Table 1 presents health risk categories and cancer risk values for chemical contaminants in drinking water that have PHGs.

The Act requires that OEHHA publish PHGs based on health risk assessments using the most current scientific methods. As defined in statute, PHGs for non-carcinogenic chemicals in drinking water are set at a concentration "at which no known or anticipated adverse health effects will occur, with an adequate margin of safety." For carcinogens, PHGs are set at a concentration that "does not pose any significant risk to health." PHGs provide one basis for revising MCLs, along with cost and technological feasibility.

OEHHA has been publishing PHGs since 1997 and the entire list published to date is shown in Table 1.

Table 2 presents health risk information for contaminants that do not have PHGs but have state or federal regulatory standards. The Act requires that, for chemical contaminants with California MCLs that do not yet have PHGs, water utilities use the federal Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) for the purpose of complying with the requirement of public notification. MCLGs, like PHGs, are strictly health based and include a margin of safety. One difference, however, is that the MCLGs for carcinogens are set at zero because the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) assumes there is no absolutely safe level of exposure to such chemicals. PHGs, on the other hand, are set at a level considered to pose no significant risk of cancer; this is usually no more than a one-in-one-million excess cancer risk (1x1o-6) level for a lifetime of exposure. In Table 2, the cancer risks shown are based on the US EPA's evaluations.

For more information on health risks: The adverse health effects for each chemical with a PHG are summarized in a PHG technical support document. These documents are available on the OEHHA website (https://oehha.ca.gov/water/public-health-goalsEXHIBIT 1 985 Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Alachlor carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.004 NAs,6 0.002 NA
Aluminum neurotoxicity and
immunotoxicity
(harms the nervous and
immune systems)

0.6 NA 1 NA
Antimony hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)

0.001 NA 0.006 NA
Arsenic carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.000004
(4x10-6)
1x1o-6
(one per
million)

0.01 2.5x10-3
(2.5 per
thousand)
Asbestos carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)
7 MFL7
(fibers >10
microns in
length)
1x10-5 7 MFL
(fibers >10
microns in
length)
1x1o-6
(one per
million)
Atrazine carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00015 1x1o-6 0.001 7x1o-6
(seven per
million)
Barium cardiovascular toxicity
(causes high blood
pressure)
2 NA 1 NA
1 Based on the OEHHA PHG technical support document unless otherwise specified. The categories are the hazard traits defined by OEHHA for California's Toxics Information Clearinghouse (online at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/risk-assessment//gcregtext011912.p . 2 mg/L = milligrams per liter of water, equivalent to parts per million (ppm) 3 Cancer Risk = Upper bound estimate of excess cancer risk from lifetime exposure. Actual cancer risk may be lower or zero. 1x10-5 means one excess cancer case per million people exposed. 4 MCL = maximum contaminant level. 5 NA = not applicable. Cancer risk cannot be calculated. 6 The PHG for alachlor is based on a threshold model of carcinogenesis and is set at a level that is believed to be without any significant cancer risk to individuals exposed to the chemical over a lifetime. 7 MFL = million fibers per liter of water.

EXHIBIT 1 986
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Bentazon hepatotoxicity and
digestive system toxicity
(harms the liver,
intestine, and causes
body weight effects8)

0.2 NA 0.018 NA
Benzene carcinogenicity
(causes leukemia)

0.00015 1x1o-6 0.001 7x1o-6
(seven per
million)
Benzo[a]pyrene carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.000007
(7x1o-6)
1x1o-6 0.0002 3x10-5
(three per
hundred
thousand)
Beryllium digestive system toxicity
(harms the stomach or
intestine)

0.001 NA 0.004 NA
Bromate carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0001 1x1o-6 0.01 1x10-4
(one per
ten
thousand)
Cadmium nephrotoxicity
(harms the kidney)

0.00004 NA 0.005 NA
Carbofuran reproductive toxicity
(harms the testis)

0.0007 NA 0.018 NA
Carbon
tetrachloride
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0001 1x1o-6 0.0005 5x10-5
(five per
million)
8 Body weight effects are an indicator of general toxicity in animal studies.

EXHIBIT 1 987
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Chlordane carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00003 1x10-5 0.0001 3x10-5
(three per
million)
Chlorite hematotoxicity
(causes anemia)
neurotoxicity
(causes neurobehavioral
effects)

0.05 NA 1 NA
Chromium,
hexavalent
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00002 1x1o-6 0.010 5x10-4 (five
per ten
thousand)
Copper digestive system toxicity
(causes nausea,
vomiting, diarrhea)

0.3 NA 1.3 (AL9) NA
Cyanide neurotoxicity
(damages nerves)
endocrine toxicity
(affects the thyroid)

0.15 NA 0.15 NA
Dalapon nephrotoxicity
(harms the kidney)

0.79 NA 0.2 NA
Di(2-ethylhexyl)
adipate (DEHA)
developmental toxicity
(disrupts development)

0.2 NA 0.4 NA
Di(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
(DEHP)
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.012 1x1o-6 0.004 3x10-7
(three per
ten million)
9 AL = action level. The action levels for copper and lead refer to a concentration measured at the tap. Much of the copper and lead in drinking water is derived from household plumbing (The Lead and Copper Rule, Title 22, California Code of Regulations [CCR] section 64672.3).

EXHIBIT 1 988
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
1,2-Dibromo-3- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.000003
(3x1o-6)
1x10-5 0.0002 7x10-5
(seven per
hundred
thousand)
chloropropane
(DBCP)
1,2-Dichloro- hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)

0.6 NA 0.6 NA
benzene
(o-DCB)
1,4-Dichloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.006 1x1o-6 0.005 8x10-7
(eight per
ten million)
benzene
(p-DCB)
1,1-Dichloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.003 1x1o-6 0.005 2x1o-6
(two per
million)
ethane
(1,1-DCA)
1,2-Dichloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0004 1x10-5 0.0005 1x10-5
(one per
million)
ethane
(1,2-DCA)
1,1-Dichloro- hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)

0.01 NA 0.006 NA
ethylene
(1,1-DCE)
1,2-Dichloro- nephrotoxicity
(harms the kidney)

0.013 NA 0.006 NA
ethylene, cis
1,2-Dichloro- immunotoxicity
(harms the immune
system)

0.05 NA 0.01 NA
ethylene, trans
Dichloromethane
(methylene
chloride)
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.004 1x10-5 0.005 1x1o-6
(one per
million)
EXHIBIT 1 989
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
2,4-Dichloro- hepatotoxicity and
nephrotoxicity
(harms the liver and
kidney)

0.02 NA 0.07 NA
phenoxyacetic
acid (2,4-D)
1 2-Dichloro- 1 carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0005 1x1o-6 0.005 1x10-5
(one per
hundred
thousand)
propane
(propylene
dichloride)
113-Dichloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0002 1x1o-6 0.0005 2x1o-6
(two per
million)
propene
(Telone II®)
Dinoseb reproductive toxicity
(harms the uterus and
testis)

0.014 NA 0.007 NA
Diquat ocular toxicity
(harms the eye)
developmental toxicity
(causes malformation)

0.006 NA 0.02 NA
Endothall digestive system toxicity
(harms the stomach or
intestine)

0.094 NA 0.1 NA
Endrin neurotoxicity
(causes convulsions)
hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)

0.0003 NA 0.002 NA
Ethylbenzene
(phenylethane)
hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)

0.3 NA 0.3 NA
Ethylene
dibromide (1)-
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00001 1x10-5 0.00005 5x10-5
(five per
Dibromoethane) million)
EXHIBIT 1 990
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Fluoride musculoskeletal toxicity
(causes tooth mottling)
1 NA 2 NA
Glyphosate nephrotoxicity
(harms the kidney)

0.9 NA 0.7 NA
Haloacetic acids:
dibromoacetic
acid
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00003 1x1o-6 0.06* 2x10-3
(two per
thousand)10
Haloacetic acids:
dichloroacetic
acid
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0002 1x1o-6 0.06* 3x10-4
(three per
ten
thousand)11
Haloacetic acids:
monobromomusculoskeletal toxicity
(causes muscular
degeneration)

0.025 NA 0.06* NA
acetic acid
Haloacetic acids:
monochlorogeneral toxicity
(causes body and organ
weight changes8)

0.053 NA 0.06* NA
acetic acid
Haloacetic acids:
trichloroacetic
acid
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0001 1x1o-6 0.06* 6x10-4
(six per ten
thousand)12
Heptachlor carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.000008
(8x 1o-6)
1x1o-6 0.00001 1x1o-6
(one per
million)
* For total haloacetic acids (the sum of dibromoacetic acid, dichloroacetic acid, monobromoacetic acid, monochloroacetic acid, and trichloroacetic acid). There are no MCLs for individual haloacetic acids. 10 Based on 0.060 mg/L dibromoacetic acid; the risk will vary with different combinations and ratios of the other haloacetic acids in a particular sample. 11 Based on 0.060 mg/L dichloroacetic acid; the risk will vary with different combinations and ratios of the other haloacetic acids in a particular sample. 12 Based on 0.060 mg/L trichloroacetic acid; the risk will vary with different combinations and ratios of the other haloacetic acids in a particular sample.

EXHIBIT 1 991
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Heptachlor
epoxide
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.000006
(6x 1o-6)
1x10-5 0.00001 2x10-5
(two per
million)
Hexachloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00003 1x1o-6 0.001 3x10-5
(three per
hundred
thousand)
benzene
Hexachloro- digestive system toxicity
(causes stomach
lesions)

0.002 NA 0.05 NA
cyclopentadiene
(HCCPD)
Lead developmental
neurotoxicity
(causes neurobehavioral
effects in children)
cardiovascular toxicity
(causes high blood
pressure)
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0002 <1x1o-6
(PHG is
not based
on this
effect)

0.015
(AL9
)
2x1o-6
(two per
million)
Lindane
(y-BHC)
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.000032 1x1o-6 0.0002 6x1o-6
(six per
million)
Mercury
(inorganic)
nephrotoxicity
(harms the kidney)

0.0012 NA 0.002 NA
Methoxychlor endocrine toxicity
(causes hormone
effects)

0.00009 NA 0.03 NA
Meth�I tertiar�- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.013 1x10-5 0.013 1x10-5
(one per
million)
butyl ether
(MTBE)
EXHIBIT 1 992
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Molinate carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.001 1x10-5 0.02 2x10-5
(two per
hundred
thousand)
Monochloro- nephrotoxicity
(harms the kidney)

0.07 NA 0.07 NA
benzene
(chlorobenzene)
Nickel developmental toxicity
(causes increased
neonatal deaths)

0.012 NA 0.1 NA
Nitrate hematotoxicity
(causes
methemoglobinemia)
45 as
nitrate
NA 10 as
nitrogen
(=45 as
nitrate)
NA
Nitrite hematotoxicity
(causes
methemoglobinemia)
3 as
nitrite
NA 1 as
nitrogen
(=3 as
nitrite)
NA
Nitrate and
Nitrite
hematotoxicity
(causes
methemoglobinemia)
10 as
nitrogen13
NA 10 as
nitrogen
NA
N-nitroso- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.000003
(3x1o-6)
1 X 1o-6 none NA
dimethyl-amine
(NOMA)
Oxamyl general toxicity
(causes body weight
effects)

0.026 NA 0.05 NA
13 The joint nitrate/nitrite PHG of 10 mg/L (10 ppm, expressed as nitrogen) does not replace the individual values, and the maximum contribution from nitrite should not exceed 1 mg/L nitrite-nitrogen.

EXHIBIT 1 993
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Pentachloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0003 1x10-5 0.001 3x10-5
(three per
million)
phenol (PCP)
Perchlorate endocrine toxicity
(affects the thyroid)
developmental toxicity
(causes neurodevelopmental deficits)

0.001 NA 0.006 NA
Perfluorooctane
sulfonic acid
(PFOS)
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)
1x1o-6 1 x1o-6 NA NA
Perfluoro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)
7x10-9 1x10-5 NA NA
octanoic acid
(PFOA)
Picloram hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)

0.166 NA 0.5 NA
Polychlorinated
biphenyls
(PCBs)
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00009 1x1o-6 0.0005 6x1o-6
(six per
million)
Radium-226 carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.05 pCi/L 1x1o-6 5 pCi/L
(combined
Ra225+22s)
1x10-4
(one per
ten
thousand)
Radium-228 carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.019 pCi/L 1x1o-6 5 pCi/L
(combined
Ra225+22s)
3x10-4
(three per
ten
thousand)
Selenium integumentary toxicity
(causes hair loss and
nail damage)

0.03 NA 0.05 NA
EXHIBIT 1 994
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Silvex (2,4,5-TP) hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)

0.003 NA 0.05 NA
Simazine general toxicity
(causes body weight
effects)

0.004 NA 0.004 NA
Strontium-90 carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.35 pCi/L 1 X 1o-6 8 pCi/L 2x10-5
(two per
hundred
thousand)
Styrene
(vinylbenzene)
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0005 1 X 1o-6 0.1 2x10-4
(two per
ten
thousand)
1,1,2,2-
Tetrachlorocarcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0001 1x10-5 0.001 1x10-5
(one per
hundred
thousand)
ethane
2,3,7,8-Tetra- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)
5x10-11 1x1o-6 3x1o-8 6x10-4
(six per ten
thousand)
chlorodibenzo-edioxin (TCDD, or
dioxin)
Tetrachloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00006 1x1o-6 0.005 8x10-5
(eight per
hundred
thousand)
ethylene
(Qerchloroethylene, or
PCE)
Thallium integumentary toxicity
(causes hair loss)

0.0001 NA 0.002 NA
EXHIBIT 1 995
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Thiobencarb general toxicity
(causes body weight
effects)
hematotoxicity
(affects red blood cells)

0.042 NA 0.07 NA
Toluene
(methylbenzene)
hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)
endocrine toxicity
(harms the thymus)

0.15 NA 0.15 NA
Toxaphene carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00003 1x1o-6 0.003 1x10-4
(one per
ten
thousand)
1,2,4-Trichloro- endocrine toxicity
(harms adrenal glands)

0.005 NA 0.005 NA
benzene
1,1,1-Trichloro- neurotoxicity
(harms the nervous
system),
reproductive toxicity
(causes fewer offspring)
hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)
hematotoxicity
(causes blood effects)
1 NA 0.2 NA
ethane
1,1,2-Trichloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0003 1x10-5 0.005 2x10-5
(two per
hundred
thousand)
ethane
Trichloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0017 1x10-5 0.005 3x10-5
(three per
million)
ethylene (TCE)
EXHIBIT 1 996
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Trichlorofluoro- accelerated mortality
(increase in early death)

1.3 NA 0.15 NA
methane
(Freon 11)
1,2,3-Trichloro- carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0000007
(?x 1o-7)
1x10-5 0.000005
(5x1o-6)
7x1o-6
(seven per
million)
propane
(1,2,3-TCP)
1,1,2-Trichloro- hepatotoxicity
(harms the liver)
4 NA 1.2 NA
1,2,2-trifluoroethane
(Freon 113)
Trihalomethanes:

Bromodichlorocarcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00006 1x10-5 0.080# 1.3x10-3
(1.3 per
thousand) methane 14
Trihalomethanes:

Bromoform
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0005 1x10-5 0.080# 2x10-4
(two per ten
thousand)15
Trihalomethanes:

Chloroform
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0004 1x10-5 0.080# 2x10-4
(two per ten
thousand)16
# For total trihalomethanes (the sum of bromodichloromethane, bromoform, chloroform, and dibromochloromethane). There are no MCLs for individual trihalomethanes. 14 Based on 0.080 mg/L bromodichloromethane; the risk will vary with different combinations and ratios of the other trihalomethanes in a particular sample. 15 Based on 0.080 mg/L bromoform; the risk will vary with different combinations and ratios of the other trihalomethanes in a particular sample. 16 Based on 0.080 mg/L chloroform; the risk will vary with different combinations and ratios of the other trihalomethanes in a particular sample.

EXHIBIT 1 997
Chemical Health Risk Category1
California
PHG
(mg/L)2
Cancer
Risk3
at the
PHG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Trihalomethanes:

Dibromochlorocarcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.0001 1x10-5 0.080# 8x10-4
(eight
per ten
thousand)17
methane
Tritium carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)
400 pCi/L 1x10-5 20,000
pCi/L
5x10-5
(five per
hundred
thousand)
Uranium carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.43 pCi/L 1x1o-6 20 pCi/L 5x10-5
(five per
hundred
thousand)
Vinyl chloride carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)

0.00005 1x1o-6 0.0005 1x10-5
(one per
hundred
thousand)
Xylene neurotoxicity
(affects the senses,
mood, and motor
control)

1.8 (single
isomer or
sum of
isomers)
NA 1.75 (single
isomer or
sum of
isomers)
NA
# For total trihalomethanes (the sum of bromodichloromethane, bromoform, chloroform, and dibromochloromethane). There are no MCLs for individual trihalomethanes. 17 Based on 0.080 mg/L dibromochloromethane; the risk will vary with different combinations and ratios of the other trihalomethanes in a particular sample.

EXHIBIT 1 998
Chemical Health Risk Category1
US EPA
MCLG2
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk3
at the
MCLG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
IDisinfection byproducts (DBPs)
Chloramines acute toxicity
(causes irritation)
digestive system toxicity
(harms the stomach)
hematotoxicity
(causes anemia)
45,6 NA7 none NA
Chlorine acute toxicity
(causes irritation)
digestive system toxicity
(harms the stomach)
45,6 NA none NA
Chlorine dioxide hematotoxicity
(causes anemia)
neurotoxicity
(harms the nervous
system)

0.85,6 NA none NA
Radionuclides
1 Health risk category based on the US EPA MCLG document or California MCL document unless otherwise specified. 2 MCLG = maximum contaminant level goal established by US EPA. 3 Cancer Risk = Upper estimate of excess cancer risk from lifetime exposure. Actual cancer risk may be lower or zero. 1x10-5 means one excess cancer case per million people exposed. 4 California MCL = maximum contaminant level established by California. 5 Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal, or MRDLG. 6 The federal Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL), or highest level of disinfectant allowed in drinking water, is the same value for this chemical. 7 NA = not available.

EXHIBIT 1 999
Chemical Health Risk Category1
US EPA
MCLG2
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk3
at the
MCLG
California
MCL4
(mg/L)
Cancer
Risk at the
California
MCL
Gross alpha
particles8
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)
0 (21op0
included)
0 15 pCi/L9
(includes
radium but
not radon
and
uranium)
upto1x1O-3
(for 210Po,
the most
potent alpha
emitter)
Beta particles
and photon
emitters8
carcinogenicity
(causes cancer)
o (21opb
included)
0 50 pCi/L
Uudged
equiv. to 4
mrem/yr)
up to 2x1O-3
(for 210Pb,
the most
potent betaemitter)
8 MCLs for gross alpha and beta particles are screening standards for a group of radionuclides. Corresponding PHGs were not developed for gross alpha and beta particles. See the OEHHA memoranda discussing the cancer risks at these MCLs at http://www.oehha.ca.gov/water/reports/grossab.html. 9 pCi/L = picocuries per liter of water.

EXHIBIT 1 1000
1 APPENDIX C
Cost Estimates for Treatment for Treatment Technologies Source – Association of California Water Agencies – Suggested Guidelines for Preparation of Required Reports dated April 2022
EXHIBIT 1 1001
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
1 Ion Exchange Coachella Valley WD, for GW, to reduce Arsenic concentrations. 2011 costs.

2.68 2 Ion Exchange City of Riverside Public Utilities, for GW, for Perchlorate treatment.

1.30 3 Ion Exchange Carollo Engineers, anonymous utility, 2012 costs for treating GW source for Nitrates. Design sauce waterconcentration:
88 mg/L NO3 Design finished water concentration: 45 mg/L NO3. Does not include concentrate disposal or land cost.

0.98 4 Granular Activated
Carbon
City of Riverside Public Utilities, GW sources, for TCE,DBCP (VOC, SOC) treatment.

0.65 5 Granular Activated
Carbon
Carollo Engineers, anonymous utility, 2012 costs for treating SW source for TTHMs. Design sauce water concentration:

0.135 mg/L. Design finished water concentration: 0.07
mg/L. Does not include concentrate disposal or land cost.

0.47 6 Granular Activated
Carbon, Liquid
Phase
LADWP, Liquid Phase GAC treatment atTujunga Wellfield.

Costs for treating 2 wells. Treament for 1,1 DCE (VOC). 2011-2012 costs.

1.99 7 Reverse Osmosis Carollo Engineers, anonymous utility, 2012 costs for treating GW source for Nitrates. Design sauce waterconcentration:
88 mg/L NO3 Design finished water concentration: 45 mg/L NO3. Does not include concentrate disposal or land cost.

1.05 8 Packed Tower
Aeration
City of Monrovia, treatment to reduce TCE, PCE
concentrations. 2011-12 costs.

0.58 9 Ozonation+
Chemical addition
SCVWD, STWTP treatment plant includes chemical
addition+ ozone generation costs to reduce THM/HAAs
concentrations. 2009-2012 costs.

0.12 10 Ozonation+
Chemical addition
SCVWD, PWTP treatment plant includes chemical
addition+ ozone generation costs to reduce THM/HAAs
concentrations, 2009-2012 costs.

0.26 11 Coagulation/
Filtration
Soquel WD, treatment to reduce manganeseconcentrations
in GW. 2011 costs.

0.98 12 Coagulation/
Filtration
Optimization
San Diego WA, costs to reduce THM/Bromate, Turbidity
concentrations, raw SW a blend of State Water Project water and Colorado River water, treated at Twin Oaks Valley WTP.

1.12 13 Blending (Well) Rancho California WD, GW blending well, 1150 gpm, to reduce fluoride concentrations.

0.93 14 Blending (Wells) Rancho California WD, GW blending wells, to reducearsenic concentrations, 2012 costs.

0.76 15 Blending Rancho California WD, using MWD water to blend with GW to reduce arsenic concentrations. 2012 costs.

0.91 16 Corrosionlnhibition Atascadero Mutual WC,corrosion inhibitor addition to control aggressive water. 2011 costs.

0.11 * Costs were adjusted from date of original estimates to present using the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20-City average Construction Cost Index of 13,571 for 2024.

EXHIBIT 1 1002
1 Reduction -
Coagulation -
Filtration
February 28, 2013, Final Report Chromium Removal
Research, City of Glendale,CA. 100-2000 gpm. Reduce
Hexavalent Chromium to 1 ppb.

2.14 - 13.38
2 IX - Weak Base
Anion Resin
February 28, 2013, Final Report Chromium Removal
Research, City of Glendale,CA. 100-2000 gpm. Reduce
Hexavalent Chromium to 1 ppb.

2.19-9.16
3 IX Golden State Water Co., IX w/disposable resin, 1MGD, Perchlorate removal, built in 2010.

0.67 4 IX Golden State Water Co., IX w/disposable resin, 1000 gpm, perchlorate removal (Proposed; O&M estimated).

1.47 5 IX Golden State Water Co., IX with brine regeneration, 500 gpm for Selenium removal, builtin 2007.

9.59 6 GFO/Adsorption Golden State Water Co., Granular Ferric Oxide Resin, Arsenic removal, 600 gpm, 2 facilities, builtin 2006.

2.51-2.67
7 RO Inland Empire Utilities Agency: ChinoBasin Desalter. RO cost to reduce 800 ppm TDS, 150 ppm Nitrate (as NO3);
approx. 7 mgd.

3.28 8 IX Inland Empire Utilities Agency: ChinoBasin Desalter. IX cost to reduce 150 ppm Nitrate (as NO3); approx. 2.6 mgd.

1.82 9 Packed Tower
Aeration
Inland Empire Utilities Agency: ChinoBasin Desalter. PTAVOC air stripping, typical treated flow of approx. 1.6 mgd.0.55 10 IX West Valley WD Report, for WaterRecycling Funding Program, for 2.88 mgd treatment facility. IX to remove
Perchlorate, Perchlorate levels 6-10 ppb. 2008 costs.

0.76 - 1.08
11 Coagulation
Filtration
West Valley WD, includes capital, O&M costs for 2.88 mgd treatment facility - Layne Christensen packaged coagulation Arsenic removal system. 2009-2012 costs.

0.50 12 FBR West Valley WD/Envirogen design data for the O&M + actual capitol costs, 2.88 mgdfluidized bed reactor (FBR) treatment system, Perchlorate and Nitrate removal, followed by multimedia filtration & chlorination, 2012. NOTE: The capitol cost for the treatment facility for the first 2,000 gpm is $23 million annualized over 20 years with ability to expand to 4,000 gpm with minimal costs in the future. $17 million funded through state and federal grants with the remainder funded by WVWD and the City of Rialto.

2.26 - 2.38
* Costs were adjusted from date of original estimates to present using the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20-City average Construction Cost Index of 13,571 for 2024.

EXHIBIT 1 1003
Granular Activated
Carbon
Malcolm Pirnie estimate for California Urban Water
Agencies, large surface water treatment plants treating water from the State Water Project to meet Stage 2 D/DBP and bromate regulation, 1998

0.77-1.47
2 Granular Activated
Carbon
Carollo Engineers, estimate for VOC treatment (PCE), 95% removal of PCE, Oct. 1994,1900 gpm design capacity

0.36 3 Granular Activated
Carbon
Carollo Engineers, est. for a large No. Calif. surf. water treatment plant ( 90 mgd capacity) treating water from
the State Water Project, to reduce THM precursors, ENR
construction cost index= 6262 (San Francisco area)- 1992

1.69 4 Granular Activated
Carbon
CH2M Hill study on San Gabriel Basin, for135 mgd central treatment facility for VOC and SOC removal by GAC, 1990

0.66 - 0.96
5 Granular Activated
Carbon
Southern California Water Co. - actual data for "rented" GAC to remove VOCs (1,1-DCE), 1.5 mgd capacity facility, 1998

3.03 6 Granular Activated
Carbon
Southern California Water Co. - actual data for permanent GAC to remove VOCs (TCE), 2.16 mgd plant capacity, 1998

1.96 7 Reverse Osmosis Malcolm Pirnie estimate for California Urban Water Agencies, large surface water treatment plants treating water from the State Water Project to meet Stage 2 D/DBP and bromate regulation, 1998

2.28 - 4.35
8 Reverse Osmosis Boyle Engineering, RO cost to reduce 1000 ppm TDS in brackish groundwater in So. Calif., 1.0 mgd plant operated at 40% of design flow, high brine line cost, May 1991

5.37 9 Reverse Osmosis Boyle Engineering, RO cost to reduce 1000 ppm TDS in brackish groundwater in So. Calif., 1.0 mgd plant operated at 100% of design flow, high brine line cost, May 1991

3.31 10 Reverse Osmosis Boyle Engineering, RO cost to reduce 1000 ppm TDS in brackish groundwater in So. Calif., 10.0 mgd plant operated at 40% of design flow, high brine line cost, May 1991

3.58 11 Reverse Osmosis Boyle Engineering, RO cost to reduce 1000 ppm TDS in brackish groundwater in So. Calif., 10.0 mgd plant operated at 100% of design flow, high brine line cost, May 1991

2.77 12 Reverse Osmosis Arsenic Removal Study, City of Scottsdale, AZ - CH2M Hill, for a 1.0 mgd plant operated at 40% of design capacity, Oct. 1991

8.99 13 Reverse Osmosis Arsenic Removal Study, City of Scottsdale, AZ - CH2M Hill, for a 1.0 mgd plant operated at 100% of design capacity, Oct. 1991

5.31 14 Reverse Osmosis Arsenic Removal Study, City of Scottsdale, AZ - CH2M Hill, for a 10.0 mgd plant operated at 40% of design capacity, Oct. 1991

3.97 * Costs were adjusted from date of original estimates to present using the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20-City average Construction Cost Index of 13,571 for 2024.

EXHIBIT 1 1004
15 Reverse Osmosis Arsenic Removal Study, City of Scottsdale, AZ - CH2M Hill, for a 10.0 mgd plant operated at 100% of design capacity, Oct. 1991

2.46 16 Reverse Osmosis CH2M Hill study on San Gabriel Basin, for135 mgd central treatment facility with RO to remove nitrate, 1990

2.48 - 4.35
17 Packed Tower
Aeration
Analysis of Costs for Radon Removal...(AWWARF
publication), Kennedy/Jenks, for a 1.4 mgd facility operating at 40% of design capacity, Oct. 1991

1.42 18 Packed Tower
Aeration
Analysis of Costs for Radon Removal...(AWWARF
publication), Kennedy/Jenks, for a 14.0 mgd facility
operating at 40% of design capacity, Oct. 1991

0.76 19 Packed Tower
Aeration
Carollo Engineers, estimate for VOC treatment (PCE) by
packed tower aeration, without off-gas treatment, O&M
costs based on operation during 329 days/year at 10%
downtime, 16 hr/day air strippingoperation, 1900 gpm
design capacity, Oct. 1994

0.38 20 Packed Tower
Aeration
Carollo Engineers, for PCE treatment by Ecolo-Flo EnviroTower air stripping, without off-gas treatment, O&M costs based on operation during 329 days/year at 10% downtime, 16 hr/day air stripping operation, 1900 gpm design
capacity, Oct. 1994

0.39 21 Packed Tower
Aeration
CH2M Hill study on San Gabriel Basin, for135 mgd central treatment facility - packed tower aeration for VOC and
radon removal, 1990

0.63 - 1.01
22 Advanced
Oxidation
Processes
Carollo Engineers, estimate for VOC treatment (PCE) by
UV Light, Ozone, Hydrogen Peroxide, O&M costs based on
operation during 329 days/year at 10% downtime, 24 hr/day AOP operation, 1900 gpm capacity, Oct. 1994

0.75 23 Ozonation Malcolm Pirnie estimate for CUWA, large surface water treatment plants using ozone to treat water from the
State Water Project to meet Stage 2 D/DBP and bro mate
regulation, Cryptosporidium inactivation requirements,1998

0.17 - 0.36
24 Ion Exchange CH2M Hill study on San Gabriel Basin, for 135 mgd central treatment facility - ion exchange to remove nitrate, 1990

0.82 - 1.08
* Costs were adjusted from date of original estimates to present using the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20-City average Construction Cost Index of 13,571 for 2024
EXHIBIT 1 1005
2025 WATER QUALITY

PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS REPORT
City Council Meeting
September 23, 2025
Agenda Item 15.2
1006
Public Health Goals Report
 Report is prepared once every 3 years
 Meets Regulatory Requirement for community water
systems of more than 10,000 customers
 Public Hearing held to accept and respond to public
comment
1007
Background
 Cal-EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment (OEHHA)
 Public Health Goals (PHGs)
 US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
 Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs)
 Report contains information about contaminants
detected above goals
 What actions taken to reduce constituents below
PHGs
1008
Report - Water Quality Data
 Constituents that exceeded a Public Health Goal (PHG) or Maximum Contaminant Level Goal in calendar years 2022-2024  Arsenic
 Bromate
 Radionuclides
 Gross Alpha
 Radium-228
 Uranium
 Total Coliforms (MCLG 0 Samples, MCL < 5%) 145-186
Samples pass each month.
 City’s water supply met all state and federal water quality standards
1009
Arsenic  Arsenic naturally occurs in groundwater supplies.  Results above the Maximum Contaminant Level MCL have a possible link to cancer  Regulatory standard (MCL) is 10 parts per billion  Public Health Goal is 0.004 parts per billion
 Arsenic cannot be detected at the PHG level  Maximum test result was 6.4 parts per billion 10 6.4

0.004
0 2
4 6
8 10
Arsenic
MCL Result PHG
1010
Best Available Technologies and Treatment Costs
Reverse Osmosis Treatment
Image Source: https://www.marlo-inc.com/news/1000-
gpm-reverse-osmosis-ro-system
1011
Estimated Fiscal Impact to Customers
 Customer impact to treat
constituents below the PHG
 $1,932 per year per
customer
 $161 per month
 Health protection benefits of
treatment to Public Health Goals
or below is not clear and may not
be quantifiable
1012
Public Meetings
 Report recommended by Water Advisory Group and
Council Water Committee
 Public Hearing noticed in the Stockton Record
 2025 Public Health Goals Report posted on the City
website (stocktonca.gov)
1013
Recommendation
 Receive public comment on Public Health Goals
Report
 Resolution to Accept 2025 Water Quality Public
Health Goals Report
1014
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-0867, Version: 1
PUBLIC HEARING: FY 2024-2025 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that, after the public hearing, the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Approving the City of Stockton’s Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for Program Year 2024-2025;

2. Authorizing the Economic Development Department to update the CAPER to incorporate any comments received during the public review period and the public hearing;

3. Authorizing submission of the CAPER to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and to make any technical alterations to the CAPER as directed by HUD; and

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute and submit all documents to the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development, and to take actions necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Summary
The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) serves to meet the performance reporting requirements of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as set forth in the Consolidated Plan Regulations. On September 8, 2025, a Public Review draft of the CAPER was published for a 15-day public comment period. The 2024- 2025 CAPER describes the activities undertaken by the City utilizing HUD funds from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 (Program Year).

As required by HUD, a 15-day public comment period and a public hearing must be held to solicit comments regarding the accomplishments reported within the 2024-2025 CAPER. The public comment period was opened on September 8, 2025, and is set to close on September 23, 2025, upon the closure of the public hearing. Following the public hearing and the closure of the 15-day public comment period, the CAPER must be submitted to HUD by September 28, 2025 (90 days following the end of the Program Year).

DISCUSSION
Background
City of Stockton Page 1 of 5 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1015
File #: 25-0867, Version: 1
The City of Stockton is an entitlement community under HUD’s Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD), receiving annual formula grant allocations under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Programs. As a condition to participate and receive these entitlement program funds, the City must develop a series of plans and reports including a five-year Consolidated Plan that establishes goals and five-year objectives informed by a series of market analysis and community needs assessments, followed by annually submitting an Annual Action Plan (AAP) for each HUD Program Year which outlines the use of HUD funds to address community needs. Following the closing of each Program Year, recipients must develop and submit the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), providing a year-end report on the implementation of the AAP and the City’s progress in meeting the Consolidated Plan goals.

The CAPER describes activities undertaken by the City during the HUD Program Year 2024-2025, beginning July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025, using CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds. These programs fund community development efforts to improve housing and opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents of the City. The accomplishments reported in the draft CAPER were developed based on information provided by project managers and subrecipients, illustrating how the City funded and administered projects to address goals of the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan.

The Program Year 2024-2025 is the fifth year of the five-year 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. While this CAPER focuses on the accomplishments of the fifth Program Year (2024-2025), this report also provides a summary and highlight of accomplishments during the five-year Consolidated Plan period Present Situation
For Program Year 2024-2025, the City was awarded the following HUD entitlement grant amounts:
· CDBG: $3,240,738
· HOME: $1,393,227.48
· ESG: $283,046
The City of Stockton continued to use CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds to address the 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan needs and goals as follows, with a more detailed review of goals and outcomes included in Exhibit 1, the draft 2024-25 CAPER :
· Goal 1: Provide housing and supportive services for the City’s homeless populations · Goal 2: Preserve, improve, and expand the supply of decent affordable housing for lowerincome households · Goal 3: Promote economic development activities that create, attract, and retain jobs and promote economic activity and vitality
· Goal 4: Ensure the provision of high-quality public services to support ongoing community development
Five-Year Year Accomplishments
During the five-year Consolidated Plan period (Program Years 2020-2024), the City received the following resources:

City of Stockton Page 2 of 5 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1016
File #: 25-0867, Version: 1
The following table represents the City’s five-year goals and accomplishments during the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan period:
*This goal indicator should not have been established under the “Housing and Services for the Homeless” goal. It is likely that accomplishments originally intended for this goal were reported under the CDBG Public Services goal, which may explain why 0 accomplishments were reported during the 5 years in this section.
**This goal indicator was intended for property acquisition. Although there have been recent acquisition activities, they are not yet completed, but 5 are currently pending.

CARES Act Resources
The following is a summary of CARES Act resources that came into the community during the Consolidated Plan period:

City of Stockton Page 3 of 5 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1017
File #: 25-0867, Version: 1
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the $2.2 trillion CARES Act stimulus package was signed into law on March 27, 2020 allocating $5 billion in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) supplemental funding and $4 billion in Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) supplemental funding to states, counties, and local jurisdictions. On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was signed into law, appropriating nearly $5 billion to the HOME program for states, counties, and local jurisdictions to administer.

In efforts to assist communities address the COVID-19 pandemic emergency, in 2020, the City of Stockton was awarded the following CARES Act funding to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic:
· $3,876,349 in CDBG CARES Act (CDBG-CV)
· $6,276,046.72 in ESG CARES Act (ESG-CV)
· $6,380,677 in HOME American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARP) CDBG-CV, ESG-CV, and HOME-ARP funds were used to address urgent needs of the community as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The tables below demonstrate the cumulative impact of HUD funds to meet the City’s 5-year Consolidated Plan goals, as well as the impacts in terms of the City’s response to the needs of the community in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic:

ESG-CV Accomplishments
Activity Accomplishments (Persons Assisted)
7 Emergency Shelter Projects 4,547
5 street outreach projects 2,251
1 rapid rehousing project 31
2 homeless prevention projects 317
TOTAL 7,146
CDBG-CV Accomplishments
Activity Accomplishments
6 small business technical assistance projects 572 businesses assisted 3 direct financial assistance to small business projects 302 businesses assisted 1 food bank project 21,149 low-income persons provided
groceries
Citizen Participation
In conformance with HUD's requirements and the City’s Community Participation Plan (CPP), a notice of the public hearing for the draft CAPER was published in The Record on September 8, 2025, which began the 15-day public review period. The draft CAPER was also posted on the City's website, shared via social media, and sent electronically via email lists, which includes various homeless services and affordable housing stakeholders.

City of Stockton Page 4 of 5 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1018
File #: 25-0867, Version: 1
A public meeting was held on September 18, 2025, by the Community Development Committee (CDC) to present the draft CAPER to the Committee and provide an opportunity for public comment.

As part of the CPP process, the draft CAPER is being presented to the City Council on September 23, 2025, to hold a public hearing which provides an additional opportunity for public comment. Any public comments received during the 15-day public comment period, CDC public meeting, and the September 23, 2025 public hearing will be included in the CAPER for submittal to HUD.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There is no impact to the General Fund. Submission of the CAPER is a federal requirement. Failure to submit this required report to HUD by the required deadline could jeopardize future CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds
City of Stockton Page 5 of 5 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1019
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 2024-2025 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENT

PROGRAMS
The City of Stockton is an entitlement community under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD) and receives annual formula grant allocations under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships (HOME), and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Programs; and
As a condition to participate and receive these entitlement program funds, the City must develop a series of plans and reports including a five-year Consolidated Plan that establishes goals and five-year objectives informed by a series of market analysis and community needs assessments, followed by annually submitting an Annual Action Plan (AAP) for each HUD Program Year which outlines the use of HUD funds to address the needs, and closing each Program Year with a Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report – CAPER providing a year-end report on the implementation of the AAP and the City’s progress in meeting the Consolidated Plan goals; and The CAPER describes activities undertaken by the City during the HUD Program Year 2024-2025, beginning July 1, 2024 and ending June 30, 2025, using CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds; and
These programs fund community development efforts to improve housing and opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents of the City; and The accomplishments reported in the draft CAPER were developed based on information provided by project managers and subrecipients, and illustrates how the City funded and administered projects to address goals of the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan; and
The Program Year 2024-2025 is the fifth year of the five-year 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan; and
The City of Stockton continued to use CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds to address the 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan; and
The CAPER serves to meet the performance reporting requirements of HUD as set forth in the Consolidated Plan Regulations; and
1020
As required by HUD, a 15-day public comment period and a public hearing must be held to solicit comments regarding the accomplishments reported within the 2024- 2025 CAPER; and
The public comment period was opened on September 8, 2025, and is set to close on September 23, 2025, upon the closure of the public hearing; and Following the public hearing and the closure of the 15-day public comment period, the CAPER must be submitted to HUD by September 28, 2025 (90 days following the end of the Program Year); now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Approve the City of Stockton’s Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for Program Year 2024–2025.

2. Authorize the Economic Development Department to update the CAPER to incorporate any comments received during the public review period and the public hearing.

3. Authorize submission of the CAPER (Exhibit 1) to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and to make any technical alterations to the CAPER as directed by HUD.

4. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute and submit all documents to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and to take actions necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED September 23, 2025 .

CHRISTINA FUGAZI
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

KATHERINE ROLAND, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1021

CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL

PERFORMANCE AND

EVALUATION REPORT
(CAPER)
Economic Development Department
425 N. El Dorado St.

Stockton, California 95202 2024-2025
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1022
CAPER 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Table of Contents
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted..................................................................................................................................... 10 CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a) ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)..................................................................................................................................................................... 17 CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) ................................................................................................. 19 CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)............................................................................................................................................................ 23 CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)..................................................................................................................................................... 24 CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230.................................................................................................................................................................... 33 CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c) ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 CR-50 - HOME 24 CFR 91.520(d).............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 CR-58 – Section 3 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 ESG SAGE CAPER ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 PR-26........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43 DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1023
CAPER 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year.

The City of Stockton’s Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 (referred to hereafter as either Fiscal Year 2024-2025 or Program Year 2024-2025) identifies Federal, State, and local funding sources allocated to the City to address the priorities established in the City’s 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan. The City of Stockton’s FY 2024-2025 grant awards were as follows: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) award was $3,240,738, HOME Investment Partnerships Program award (HOME) was $1,393,227.48, and the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) was $283,046.

The City’s Economic Development Department (EDD) is the lead agency responsible for the administration and management of programs and projects covered by CDBG, ESG, and HOME program funds. Besides administering federal CDBG, ESG, and HOME program funds, the City’s EDD also administers several other state programs including but not limited to Homekey, Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Grant (HHAP), and Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program (PLHA), in addition to several other federal grant programs such as HOME American Rescue Plan Program (HOME-ARP), and American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). These funds are used together with CDBG, ESG, and HOME funds to advance the City’s Consolidated Plan goals. Although this CAPER primarily serves to report CDBG, ESG, and HOME program accomplishments, this report may reference the use of these additional vital resources that assist the City’s efforts in addressing its Consolidated Plan community and economic development needs.

The following includes highlights, by category, of City of Stockton’s accomplishments that took place in Program Year 2024-2025:

Affordable Housing:

In terms of affordable housing outcomes, there are two categories of funding under which the City supports/sponsors housing projects: 1) “HUD Sponsored” housing, for which the City used HUD funds to provide financial assistance to local developers for affordable housing development and 2) “Non-HUD Sponsored”, for which the City used non-HUD funds (e.g. State PLHA, HHAP, Homekey, or other non-HUD funds) to financially support affordable housing projects.

HUD Sponsored Housing: This Program Year, the City reported one HUD Sponsored affordable housing project being completed (Town Center Studios – CDBG funds) adding 20 affordable housing units to the City’s housing stock. In addition, the City provided CDBG assistance to six (6) DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1024
CAPER 3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
owner-occupied income eligible homeowners to address health and safety repairs.

Non-HUD Sponsored Housing: This Program Year, there were an additional two affordable housing projects (Calaveras Quarters and Villa D’ Flore) completed in Stockton adding 83 housing units to the City’s housing stock. These projects were assisted with non-HUD sources such as ARPA, Homekey, and HHAP funds.

Although non-HUD sponsored units are not reported to HUD as numeric achievements toward Consolidated Plan outcomes, it is important to highlight the completion of these units as an important accomplishment in the community which portrays the City’s efforts in creating housing opportunities for lower income households.

Total Housing Units: In PY 2024-2025, a total of 26 HUD sponsored units were completed and an additional 83 units were completed with nonHUD funds for a total of 109.

Public Services:

Utilizing $270,000 in CDBG public service funds, the City funded three (3) public services providers to provide the Stockton community with access to groceries and healthy produce and to provide housing, wraparound services, and housing placement for transition aged youth at risk of homelessness.

Homeless Services:

Utilizing $261,818 in ESG funding, the City supported a homeless prevention project and youth shelter operations.

Economic Development:

The City utilized CDBG funds to administer two (2) programs aimed at supporting small businesses and their related networks. These programs included the Commercial Façade Improvement Program and the Stocked Full of Produce Program.

Two (2) Commercial Façade Improvement projects have been approved and are set to proceed through the program, while four (4) projects were successfully completed during the 2024-2025 program year.

DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1025
CAPER 4
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.

Goal Category Source /
Amount
Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected
–
Strategic
Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected
–
Program
Year
Actual –
Program
Year
Percent
Complete
Affordable
Housing
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
CDBG:
$700,000
Rental units
constructed
Household
Housing
Unit
450 360 80% 0 20 N/A
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
N/A Rental units
rehabilitated
Household
Housing
Unit
210 0 0% 103 0 0%
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
CDBG:
$632,060.74
Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated
Household
Housing
Unit
20 14 70% 7 6

85.71%
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
N/A
Direct Financial
Assistance to
Homebuyers
Households
Assisted
15 0 0% 0 0 N/A
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1026
CAPER 5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
N/A Other Other 20 0 0% 0 0 N/A
Housing and
Services for
the
Homeless
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
N/A
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
1,000 0 0% 0 0 N/A
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
ESG: $6,000
Tenant-based
rental assistance /
Rapid Rehousing
Households
Assisted
0 59 N/A 0 10 N/A
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
ESG:
$76,500
Homeless Person
Overnight Shelter
Persons
Assisted
15,000 14,116 94.1% 43 303
704.65%
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
ESG:
$50,585.74
Homelessness
Prevention
Persons
Assisted
500 333 66.6% 44 67
152.27%
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1027
CAPER 6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Affordable
Housing
Public
Housing
Homeless
N/A Other Other 800,000 0 0% 0 0 N/A
Public
Services
NonHomeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
N/A
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
37,500 1,152 3.07% 0 0 N/A
NonHomeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$270,000
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
37,500 935,955 2,495.88% 115,085 46,632 40.52%
Support
Economic
Development
NonHomeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$253,374.92
Facade
treatment/business
building
rehabilitation
Business 15 13 86.66% 5 4 80%
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1028
CAPER 7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
NonHomeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
N/A Jobs
created/retained Jobs 25 2 8% 0 0 N/A
NonHomeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
N/A Businesses assisted
Businesses
Assisted
60 428 713.33% 15 0 0%
Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.

In the five-year Consolidated Plan, the City of Stockton identified four goals to guide the 2020-2025 funding cycles: 1) housing and supportive services for the homeless, 2) access to affordable housing, 3) support for economic development, and 4) availability of public services. These four goals guided the disbursement of entitlement funds to several activities that address community needs and priorities.

Goal 1
Provide housing and services for the City’s homeless population, including homelessness prevention:

In 2024-2025, the City addressed this goal by utilizing ESG funds toward homeless shelter operations, homeless prevention, and rapid-rehousing.

DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1029
CAPER 8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Under the ESG program, the City funded the following activities:
• Shelter operations
• A shelter rehabilitation project
• Rapid-rehousing and homeless prevention services
Utilizing CDBG public service funding, the City addressed this goal by directing funding towards the following activities:
• Transition aged youth programming to provide young adults aged 18-24 exiting the foster care system with housing, counseling, job readiness skills and job placement, financial literacy, and assistance with pursuing higher education.

Goal 2
Improve, preserve, and expand the supply of affordable housing for low-income households.

The City continued partnerships with local affordable housing developers to assist in the development of multifamily housing projects. In program year 2024-2025, one HUD-sponsored multifamily affordable housing project was completed totaling 20 new affordable units made available. Besides creating new units, the City's Single Family Housing Repair Program aims to preserve and improve the conditions of lowincome households by providing rehabilitation services. During the program year, the City provided assistance to 6 income eligible households.

The program helps homeowners address health and safety repairs including but not limited to new roofing, window replacement, HVAC repairs and replacement, ADA modifications, interior and exterior painting, and termite repair damage.

Goal 3
Promote economic development activities that create, attract, and retain jobs and promote economic activity and vitality, including those that provide economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income persons.

Utilizing CDBG funds, the City supported local businesses through commercial rehabilitation projects that improved properties located in economically disadvantaged and/or blighted areas. These efforts helped to encourage private investment along key commercial corridors, helping revitalize business districts and strengthen neighborhood economies. Additionally, the Stocked Full of Produce program supported small convenience stores in underserved neighborhoods by funding refrigeration and equipment upgrades t DRAFT
hat enable the sale of fresh, affordable
EXHIBIT 1 1030
CAPER 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
produce. This initiative not only increases access to healthy food options but also strengthens small business operations and sustains local employment opportunities. Collectively, these programs stimulate commercial revitalization, eliminate blight, and expand essential access for residents in low- and moderate-income areas.

Goal 4
Ensure the provision of high-quality public services to support ongoing community development, including the provision of funding for fair housing services, among other activities.

In the 2024-2025 Program Year, the City of Stockton supported essential public services by distributing CDBG funding to organizations that delivered vital public services to low/moderate income individuals and households in Stockton. The programs/projects that participated in the impact include the following:
• Second Harvest Food Bank provided 20,739 persons with access to groceries across 21 partner pantries. • The Emergency Food Bank assisted 25,860 persons with access to groceries at their main food pantry distribution center. • Children's Home of Stockton provided transition age youth services to 33 young adults to further their development and lifelong skills.

These services include shelter, counseling, education, workforce development, and housing placement.

DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1031
CAPER 10
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).

91.520(a)

CDBG HOME
White 12,425 0
Black or African American 5,920 0
Asian 3,913 0
American Indian or American Native 3,295 0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1,141 0
Total 26,694 0
Hispanic 8,807 0
Not Hispanic 17,887 0
Describe the clients assisted (including the racial and/or ethnicity of clients assisted with ESG) HESG
American Indian, Alaska Native, or Indigenous 1
Asian or Asian American 8
Black, African American, or African 162
Hispanic/Latina/e/o 69
Middle Eastern or North African 0
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 4
White 44
Multiracial 7
Client doesn't know 0
Client prefers not to answer 0
Data not collected 6
Total 301
Table 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative
Because the format of the tables above does not align with how CDBG, HOME, and ESG data is collected in IDIS and how ESG data is collected in HMIS, the total counts of people served by racial and ethnic status cannot be fully represented. This table does not capture the same race and ethnicity data as IDIS and HMIS therefore the totals in this table will be lower than the total count of clients served in the 2024-202
DRAFT
5 program year.

EXHIBIT 1 1032
CAPER 11
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program Year
CDBG public - federal $5,468,172 $3,553,932.87
HOME public - federal $2,188,331.47 $1,051,701.24
ESG public - federal $283,046 $163,327.47
Table 3 - Resources Made Available
Narrative
The resources made available includes the annual entitlement, program income, and reprogrammed/prior year reprogrammed income. The “Amount Expended During Program Year” only includes funds spent on direct services and excludes administration costs.

In addition to the yearly entitlement, the City of Stockton received a total of $339,344.52 in CDBG and $306,576.47 in HOME program income during FY 2023-2024. The City’s Revolving Loan Fund earned $5,709.91 in interest during the fiscal year. A wire transferring that amount back to HUD was completed on September 5, 2025.

Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned Percentage
of Allocation
Actual Percentage
of Allocation
Narrative
Description
City-wide 100 100
Table 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Narrative
The City did not identify geographic target areas for distribution of HUD funds. The City makes its programs and resources available citywide. The City had previously amended the Consolidated Plan to adopt and utilize a Slum-Blight Map to qualify projects under the Commercial Façade Improvement Program.

Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan.

The City was able to leverage additional resources in several of its projects. Leverage amounts DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1033
CAPER 12
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
are listed below:
• Affordable Housing: In Program Year 2024-2025, the City of Stockton awarded approximately $18.76 million from several City sources, for affordable housing projects (Ruhl Building, Harding Way Apartments, Fairview Terrace Apartments, Kentfield Apartments, Casa de Mariposa, Hunter House, La Passeggiata, and STAND and DCDC unit acquisitions), which will result in approximately $ 167.2 million of leveraged funds from other sources to be secured by housing developers. Once developed, the City’s investment will result in the creation of 501affordable housing units and the preservation of 90 affordable housing units within the next several months/years providing housing opportunities to low income and/or homeless households in Stockton.
• HHAP: The City received $30,757,176.28 in HHAP Rounds 1 through 5 grant funding. In Round 1, the City invested nearly one-third of its HHAP funds to increase the capacity of low barrier sheltering in the City. In HHAP Rounds 2 through 5, over half of funds have and will be allocated to the development and subsequent operations of permanent housing projects.
• PIP: In 2023, the City received a Prohousing Designation from the State of California.

Alongside the designation, the City received $2,370,000 in Prohousing Incentive Pilot (PIP) Program funding. PIP funding was awarded to the Delta Community Developers Corporation (DCDC) for the Edison House (Harding Way Apartments) Project, providing flexible funding for the acquisition of an existing commercial office building, with a subsequent conversion of the building a 32-unit multi-family residential building for justice-involved mental health consumers.
• ARPA: In 2021, the City received $78 million through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). Funding was allocated to several categories that align with both the Annual Action Plan and the Consolidated Plan goals. In program year 2024-2025, ARPA funds were used to support shelter operations.
• ECRG: In 2022, the City pursued and was awarded a $5.25 million cleanup grant from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Equitable Community Revitalization Grant Program (ECRG) for a 9-acre City-owned site along the downtown waterfront. This cleanup work, slated to take place during FY 25/26, will address goals within the Consolidated Plan, particularly those related to the creation of Affordable Housing units.
• Accelerator for America: In 2019, the City received a $50,000 grant from Accelerator for America for the California Spark Grant Program to support the City's efforts in attracting private investment to qualified Opportunity Zones. Since then, the City has utilized the DRAFT
funds to support various development and investment efforts in underserved EXHIBIT 1 1034
CAPER 13
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
areas. Funds were fully expended during the 2024-2025 program year. • SBA Congressional Earmark: In 2022, the City was awarded a $1 million grant through the 2022 Congressional Community Projects Grant to support initiatives related to small business development and entrepreneurship, including programmatic and construction activities slated for the ground floor commercial space of a City-owned parking structure to support food-based startups. This grant has been fully exhausted. • Publicly Owned Land/Property: The City maintains a website landing page (www.stocktonca.gov/surplus) containing all publicly owned land that has been declared surplus through the California Surplus Land Act process. Interested housing developers, or other interested parties, may inquire with Economic Development staff on available publicly owned land.
• ESG: The City of Stockton requires that ESG subrecipients contribute a 100% match of their ESG award. The City enforced reporting their match contributions during quarterly monitoring activities.

Fiscal Year Summary – HOME Match

1. Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 13,555,188

2. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year 0

3. Total match available for current Federal fiscal year (Line 1 plus Line 2) 13,555,188

4. Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 0

5. Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (Line 3 minus Line 4) 13,555,188 Table 5 – Fiscal Year Summary - HOME Match Report
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1035
CAPER 14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year
Project No. or
Other ID
Date of
Contribution
Cash
(non-Federal
sources)
Foregone
Taxes, Fees,
Charges
Appraised
Land/Real
Property
Required
Infrastructure
Site
Preparation,
Construction
Materials,
Donated labor
Bond
Financing
Total Match

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Table 6 – Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year HOME MBE/WBE report
Program Income – Enter the program amounts for the reporting period Balance on hand at
beginning of reporting
period
$
Amount received during
reporting period
$
Total amount expended
during reporting period
$
Amount expended for
TBRA
$
Balance on hand at end
of reporting period
$
2,201,401.84 306,576.47 0 0 2,507,978.31
Table 7 – Program Income
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1036
CAPER 15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Minority Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises – Indicate the number and dollar value of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period Total Minority Business Enterprises White NonAlaskan Hispanic Native or
American
Indian
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Black NonHispanicHispanic
Contracts
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Women
Business
Enterprises
Male
Contracts
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0
Number 0 0 0
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0
Table 8 - Minority Business and Women Business Enterprises Minority Owners of Rental Property – Indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners and the total amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted Total Minority Property Owners White NonAlaskan Hispanic Native or
American
Indian
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Black NonHispanicHispanic
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
DRAFT
Table 9 – Minority Owners of Rental Property
EXHIBIT 1 1037
CAPER 16
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Relocation and Real Property Acquisition – Indicate the number of persons displaced, the cost of relocation payments, the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisition Parcels Acquired 0 0
Businesses Displaced 0 0
Nonprofit Organizations
Displaced 0 0
Households Temporarily
Relocated, not Displaced 0 0
Households
Displaced
Total Minority Property Enterprises White NonAlaskan Hispanic Native or
American
Indian
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Black NonHispanicHispanic
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 10 – Relocation and Real Property Acquisition
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1038
CAPER 17
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.

One-Year
Goal
Actual
(HUD Sponsored)
Actual
(Not HUD-Sponsored)
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 103 20
68 Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 7 6
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
15 Total 110 26 83
Table 11 – Number of Households
One-Year
Goal
Actual
(HUD Sponsored)
Actual
(Non HUD-Sponsored)
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance 0 0
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units 0 20
83 Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 110 6
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 0 0
Total 110 26 83
Table 12 – Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.

Table 11 and 12 demonstrate the projected and actual numbers served by population and service type.

The figures represented in tables 11 and 12 above correspond to the following projects:

HUD Sponsored Units
• The completion of the Town Center Studios project resulted in the production of 20 new units DRAFT
for the provision of affordable housing units to homeless households.

EXHIBIT 1 1039
CAPER 18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
• Six Single Family Rehab projects were completed to maintain affordable housing for nonhomeless households.

Non-HUD Sponsored Units
• The completion of the Calaveras Quarters housing project resulted in the production of 68 new units for the provision of affordable housing units for at risk of homeless individuals. • The completion of the Villa D’ Flore housing project resulted in the production of 15 new units for the provision of affordable housing units for at risk of homeless individuals.

Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.

Reflecting on the affordable housing goals and outcomes, the City will take the following actions when developing the next action plan.
• Projects not completed in 2024-2025 will be reported in future action plans and CAPERs once completed.

Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.

Number of Households Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual
Extremely Low-income 20
Low-income 6
Moderate-income
Total 26
Table 13 – Number of Households Served
Narrative Information
CDBG funds were used to produce new multifamily housing units and rehabilitate single-family houses.

No HOME funds were used in 2024-2025. The City expects to use HOME funds in the 2025-2026 program year.

DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1040
CAPER 19
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through:

Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City of Stockton identifies needs and develops strategic solutions to reduce and end homelessness within the framework of the Regional Strategic Action Plan to Reduce and End Homelessness and as guided by the City’s Local Homeless Action Plan, local Point In time (PIT) Count data and other metrics through the local Homeless Management Information System.

The San Joaquin Continuum of Care (SJCoC) conducts the County wide PIT Count of unsheltered persons every other year. The most recently completed PIT Count of unsheltered persons conducted in 2024 identified 3,469 individuals in the County live in unsheltered locations. Based on the previous PIT Count conducted in 2022 there was a 104% increase in homelessness across the County. Since 2019, the majority of persons experiencing homelessness in the County are unsheltered, and the majority (over 70 percent) of unsheltered individuals are experiencing chronic homelessness.

Stockton is the largest city in the County and the hub for many available services. As expected, a large percentage counted as homeless (sheltered or unsheltered) through the 2024 PIT Count were located in Stockton (2,996 or 63%). The general trends of homelessness for the County outlined above can be considered a close representation of the picture of homelessness on a single day in January 2024 in Stockton. Key findings in reviewing county-specific data include:
• Five percent of individuals experiencing homelessness in the County were veterans (249 out of 4,732).
• Fifty-four percent of individuals experiencing homelessness in the County reported the biggest obstacle to obtaining permanent housing was the inability to afford rent. • Like the County, the State, and the nation, more males experience homelessness in Stockton than females (66% versus 34%).
• Thirty-six percent of individuals experiencing homelessness in the County reported having a significant mental illness, and 40% percentage reported having a substance use disorder.

With funding from the City, County, SJCoC, and Managed Care Plan Partners, the SJCoC contracted with Applied Survey Research (ASR) to coordinate the County's 2024 PIT Count of Unsheltered individuals.

Previous PIT Counts have been unfunded; driven by donations and volunteers. Unlike in previous years, the 2024 Count included a one-day observation census process followed by a separate, two-week survey period. The approach included community volunteers and participation of persons with lived experiences. ASR will continue to support targeted outreach efforts to ensure special populations were represented, including youth, families, and persons residing in encampments. School districts for the DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1041
CAPER 20
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
first time in the County participated in collecting data on households meeting the HUD definition of homelessness. A separate and targeted count of young people experiencing homelessness in the County was also conducted. Together, these efforts should result in a more accurate and standardized methodology, allowing for better comparisons year to year.

Unsheltered Encampment Outreach Study
The five-week survey conducted by ASR after the 2024 PIT Count showed a decrease in homelessness among the African American population: 19% in 2024 compared to 24% during the 2022 PIT Count.

While homelessness decreased among the African American population, they continue to be overrepresented among individuals experiencing homelessness in San Joaquin County as African Americans comprise of only 8.3% of San Joaquin County's population. Survey results also showed a decrease among homeless males, from 65% in 2022 to 60% in 2024. Unfortunately, the survey resulted in an increase among homeless women in 2024, 38% compared to 34% in 2022. Survey results provide valuable information on continuous homelessness's challenges throughout the County.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The PIT Count of sheltered individuals experiencing homelessness is conducted biannually. In 2024, there were 1,263 people living in Emergency Shelters and Transitional Housing units in the County. This represents a 27 percent of the total homeless population. In Stockton, an estimated 2,451 individuals are unsheltered on any given night, based on 2024 PIT count results. There are approximately 605 emergency shelter beds within the City of Stockton based on HMIS reporting. ESG funds are helpful however, in the demand for services and permanent supportive.

The City is addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons with State of California HHAP funds and American Rescue Plan Act funds to strengthen and enhance the homeless system of care and to build a Housing First approach.

Over the past three years, the City has contributed State funding to develop a new low-barrier navigation center to be operated by and at St. Mary’s Community Services. The City is also working in partnership with the SJCoC’s Shelter Committee to address concerns with local shelter programs.

Construction of the Navigation Center is estimated to be complete in fall 2025.

In addition, in June 2023, the City and County entered a joint agreement to fund the development of a non-congregate, low-barrier shelter project, the Pathways Neighborhood, located steps from the Navigation Center and operated by St. Mary’s Community Services. Together, these two low-barrier shelter projects would almost double the City’s shelter capacity over current levels. Both projects will be service enriched and emphasize quick connections to permanent housing opportunities, regardless of housing “readiness”, and are anticipated to open during the 2025-2026 Program Year.

Helping low
DRAFT -income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely EXHIBIT 1 1042
CAPER 21
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs The City is investing in programs designed to prevent low-income individuals and families from becoming homeless and developing solutions to prevent homelessness for those exiting institutions. Specific examples include:
• Homeless individuals discharged from an institutional setting: In partnership with local stakeholders and the County, the City is developing a multi-pronged strategy to address and prevent homelessness for vulnerable populations following discharge from institutional settings.

Working in partnership with the County Health Department, local hospitals, the Medicare managed care health plans for the area, and local community homeless serving agencies, the CoC is developing a series of post-discharge options for people experiencing homelessness that will include a specialty care emergency shelter.
• Federal CDBG and ESG funds are strategically supporting these and other homeless assistance programs, including emergency shelter programs for single adults, families, youth, and victims of domestic violence. CDBG funds are used to reinforce safety-net programs for vulnerable individuals and families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, including several food assistance programs, a fair housing program, and transition aged youth programming to curb homelessness for the young adult population.
• ESG funding was also allocated to Central Valley Low Income Housing Corporation for their homeless prevention program. Additionally, the City is a recipient of State formula funding under the Local Permanent Housing Allocation and Homekey initiatives in which the City invests in developing affordable housing for low-income and homeless individuals and families. • Affordable Housing Development: The City of Stockton continued to invest State and Federal resources toward affordable housing projects. These projects have a direct impact on the community by providing affordable rental housing to low-income households which help in avoiding these populations becoming homeless. In 2024-2025, a total of 109 affordable housing units were completed providing housing opportunities to eligible populations.

Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again
DRAFT
.

EXHIBIT 1 1043
CAPER 22
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Rapid Rehousing, Landlord Incentives and Housing Navigation ESG and HHAP funds will continue to provide significant investments in Rapid Rehousing solutions designed to help individuals and families quickly exit homelessness and return to permanent housing, including special efforts to re-vamp the region's rapid re-housing program by providing incentives to developers and landlords to participate in affordable housing programs, which is struggling in a tight rental market. The City has begun shifting its approach to these programs as results have varied. The City has ensured that the Navigation Center at the Emergency Shelter will include Housing Navigation Services.

Development of Permanent Housing
The region has prioritized the acquisition and development of affordable housing solutions, including permanent housing projects for individuals experiencing homelessness. Nearly one-third of the City’s HHAP Round 1 and between 50 to 90 percent of the City's HHAP Rounds 2, 3, and 4 program funds are allocated towards permanent housing for the homeless.

The City of Stockton, in partnership with the Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin and local community partners, has applied for and been awarded funding for three Homekey projects to provide permanent housing for homeless individuals. These projects seek to provide 128 units of permanent housing in Stockton for homeless individuals and families over the next two to three years. The City’s Homekey projects serve some of the most vulnerable populations, including one project focused on chronically homeless individuals and another serving at-risk families and transition-age youth, with 68 units funded through the HCV Project-Based Vouchers, including 11 ADA-compliant ground floor units and 7 units specially designed for residents with hearing and visual impairments.

Our regional partners through the County and the SJCoC have made similar investments, most notably with the opening of Victory Gardens, a permanent housing program for homeless veterans. The County estimates that through partnership with the PHA over the last four years, about 454 new units of permanent supportive housing units will be opened or added in the County once fully operational.

Coordinated Entry System
The City and County have made significant investments in the maintenance and the continued expansion of the Coordinated Entry System (CES). The CES is intended to provide a fair and effective way for individuals and families experiencing homelessness to access emergency sheltering and housing resources. Working closely with the HMIS Lead Agency, the CES now administrates a by-name list which includes clients originating from nearly every homeless services provider within the CoC. Funding has expended
DRAFT
the use of the CES to include sheltering and permanent housing units.

EXHIBIT 1 1044
CAPER 23
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
The City of Stockton and the Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin (hereafter referred to as HACSJ or Housing Authority) maintain a strong partnership in relation to the development and provision of decent, safe, and affordable housing within the City of Stockton. The HACSJ is the largest affordable housing property manager of multi-family and single household public housing units for lower income people in San Joaquin County. According to the HACSJ’s 2024-2025 PHA Plan, the HACSJ currently operates 6,182 subsidized housing units composed of the following:
• 955 public housing units
• 5,227 housing choice vouchers
The City of Stockton and the HACSJ maintain a strong partnership in relation to the development and provision of decent, safe, and affordable housing within the City of Stockton.

During Program Year 2024-2025, the City allocated $2.37 million in State Pro-Housing Incentive Program funds to DCDC’s Edison House affordable housing project which will result in the creation of 31 new units of affordable housing.

Through the use of Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) funds, the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) conducted a feasibility study for developing a Regional Housing Trust Fund (RHTF). The City and other local partners, including HACSJ, are monitored and engaged in the process. SJCOG is moving forward with the creation of the Trust Fund and City is monitoring activation.

Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
The HACSJ administers a Family Self Sufficiency (FSS) Program. Under the Housing Authority’s FSS program, public housing residents can participate in the program and receive referred to services and establish a family escrow savings account. The FSS program allows residents to establish an escrow savings account based on earned income. Contributions can be made to the escrow savings account monthly, if there is an increase in earned income during their participation in the FSS program. FSS participant have utilized the escrow savings account to accomplish homeownership goals, such as credit repair, credit counseling, and down-payment on a home.

The Housing Authority also operates a homeownership voucher program. This program allows existing voucher participants to use their voucher to purchase a home and receive a monthly homeownership subsidy. The Housing Authority will continue to collaborate with the City to provide supportive services for potential homeownership families.

Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1045
CAPER 24
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The Housing Authority of San Joaquin County is not designated as “troubled” by HUD.

CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) California has enacted a number of policies to improve the overall supply of housing throughout the State with specific efforts to increase the inventory of affordable housing. In addition to these State policies, the City of Stockton completed a three-part series of zoning amendments removing further development barriers for affordable housing. A number of strategies, action items, and metrics have been identified to achieve this objective, and the first step was to improve the development process to remove barriers to developing affordable housing, to streamline the processes, and make it more widely available. Many of these action items were achieved through a three-phase series of amendments to the general plan and zoning updates through the Land Use Inconsistency (LUI).

On July 12, 2022, the Stockton City Council approved the final phase of LUI updates. The update applied to the zoning map, zoning code, and General Plan Land Use Map to ensure consistency with other City documents and policies. The update was intended to strengthen the community vision, improve the clarity of Stockton’s regulations, provide additional development incentives, and establish tools that increase housing supply to meet demand. Some of the updates improve policies around increasing the housing supply and affordable housing, as outlined below:
• Consistency with Stockton updated 2040 General Plan standards: Updates to zoning districts allowing for more mixed use, housing, and higher density. Exemptions from development and land use approval requirements (includes certain fences and walls in residential zoning districts, interior remodeling, repairs and maintenance, utilities, and more). Updates to permit requirements by zoning districts.
• Amendments to comply with State law.
• Improvements to streamline the development review process: Creation of minor design review process for streamlined approvals.
• Affordable Housing and Density Bonus: The State Density Bonus provides up to 35% more density to developers. The Stockton Density Bonus has two tiers that can provide up to an additional 50% or 100% density bonus for eligible developments. • Parking incentives and deviations: Increases the infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists and includes additional parking deviations and revised parking standards to reduce the required parking for new development that meets certain criteria (thus reducing development costs). • Housing Typology: Clarifications for rooming and boarding houses, transitional and supportive housing, low-barrier navigation centers, and co-living increasing the zoning for allowance. •
DRAFT
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)Streamlined process to further the State’s goal to increase EXHIBIT 1 1046
CAPER 25
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
housing supply. Include Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU) as required by State law. • Multi-Unit Residential: Creation of multi-unit residential housing typologies, including development standards for cottage courts, fourplexes, triplexes, and duplexes.

Pro-housing Designation
In April 2023, the City received a Pro-housing Designation from the California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD), Stockton was one of the first jurisdictions within California that earned this designation. This designation was determined by the community's commitment to build more housing and adopting policies whose end goal is to increase housing production to help meet the state's housing production goals, including housing to meet the needs of low-income Californians. The Prohousing Designation will allow the City to receive incentives such as additional points or other preferences in the scoring of competitive funding programs administered by the HCD and allow the City to be eligible for the Pro-housing Incentive Pilot Program with funding to help accelerate the City's affordable housing production.

The Economic Review Committee
The City continues to offer free predevelopment meeting with the Economic Review Committee (ERC), which provides additional guidance and assistance for development in Stockton. Coordinated through the Economic Development Department, the ERC is comprised of high-level staff from each of the permitting departments. The ERC will meet with project managers and review preliminary site plans, providing feedback and project requirements before the project is submitted for site plan/design review and building permits. This allows the project manager to be aware of and address the possible challenges to the project early in the development process. The ERC committee has assisted with numerous affordable housing projects to help developers navigate and understand the regulatory environment and entitlement process in California, meet additional building regulations based on funding sources, and provide additional access to local and state resources.

Housing Element and Related Housing Plans
In July 2024, the City adopted its 2023-2031 6th cycle housing element. In addition to the new housing element, a citywide housing action plan and three supportive neighborhood action plans were adopted by the City in 2024. These action plans expand upon the housing element programs to facilitate equitable housing production, maintain existing housing stock, and provide supportive services to communities that need them.

Affordable Housing Development Public Facilities Fee Exemption Program The City-Wide Affordable Housing Development Public Facilities Fees Exemption Program provides an exemption for certain PFFs for new affordable housing developments located within city limits.

DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1047
CAPER 26
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City of Stockton is committed to reducing barriers for people experiencing homelessness to access the critical services they need. As part of the City’s overall strategy to address homelessness and affordable housing, the City sought to partner with organizations whose projects directly reduced barriers for homeless people to gain access to essential services. Through the City’s NOFA process, several organizations received funding for projects and programs directly aimed toward addressing obstacles to meet underserved needs for the city’s most vulnerable populations. Subrecipient organizations funded by the City which took direct action to tackle obstacles to meeting underserved needs include:

In partnership with the City of Stockton, the following organizations are taking actions to address obstacles to meet underserved needs:
• Central Valley Low Income Housing Corporation (CVLIHC) is utilizing ESG funding to provide homeless prevention services and direct intervention on behalf of households who are at risk of becoming homeless.
• PREVAIL CA is utilizing ESG funding to provide shelter, housing and supportive services to homeless youth and their children.
• Delta Community Developers Corporation utilized state HHAP funding to implement a Landlord Incentive Program aimed at expanding rental opportunities for Housing Choice Vouchers in order to prevent homelessness by maintaining families in permanent housing. • Family Resource Center used state HHAP funding to operate Coordinated Entry System to streamline the process of finding housing for those who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, with the intent of housing the most vulnerable individuals first. • Children’s Home of Stockton utilized CDBG & state HHAP funding to operate a transition aged youth program. The aim of transition aged youth programs is to curb and prevent homelessness from the beginning. Given their circumstances, young adults transitioning out of the foster care system are extremely vulnerable to experiencing homelessness. By assisting in funding these programs, these young adults are provided with housing assistance, counseling, and assistance with educational and career goals with the desired outcome of transitioning them into permanent housing.

Recognizing the need to building capacity in local nonprofits, especially for those that serve underserved communities, the City invested in a four-year nonprofit capacity building program funded through ARPA and administered by United Way. This innovative approach will better assist the City in responding to community need. In 2024, the City approved a fourth year of funding. To date, over 30 nonprofits have graduated the program, all with a strategic plan, increased business capacity, and new-found support system and lifelong resources through the United Way of San Joaquin.

Actions taken to reduce lead
DRAFT -based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
EXHIBIT 1 1048
CAPER 27
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The actions described in the Lead Based Paint Hazards section of the Consolidated Plan were carried out as needed during PY 2024-2025.

The City of Stockton becomes involved in lead-based paint hazard evaluation and reduction as a result of its implementation and operation of all Federally funded projects available to the residents of Stockton. This includes projects funded with CDBG and HOME. Housing units that were recommended to be rehabilitated were inspected and if necessary, tested for lead-based paint hazards. Based on the test results, any identified hazards are remediated prior to unit occupancy. Included in the City’s HOME Policies and Procedures, it is the developer’s and/or property owner’s duty to distribute the “Renovate Right” Brochure entitled “Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home” to the tenants and receive a signed acknowledgement form that the reading material was distributed. In the instance of a single family rehabilitation project, a City employee distributes the material to the homeowner and collect a signed receipt that the material was received.

The City has complied with all Federal requirements related to prevention of lead-based paint poisoning as provided in the Residential Lead-Based Pain Hazard Act of 1992, also commonly referred to as Title X, Housing and Community Development Act of 1992.

In recent years, the City of Stockton updated its Environmental Review Policy & Procedure to ensure all HUD-funded projects are evaluated for environmental impacts and adequate mitigation measures are put in place and appropriately tracked, if required.

Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City’s Consolidated Plan included an Antipoverty Strategy. The activities in the City’s Antipoverty Strategy can be classified under two categories: Economic Development and Supportive Service Programs. The Consolidated Plan recognized that for households to transition from unemployment or low-income positions to median income positions, there needs to be vocational training, resource management, and life skill training. The Plan also recognized that while households are obtaining the training, the families will continue to need assistance in meeting their basic needs.

Consistent with the City’s Antipoverty Strategy, the City funded the following programs/projects:
• Two programs that provided food assistance to homeless and/or low-income individuals. • Homelessness prevention, landlord incentives, and re-housing activities which provide shortterm assistance aimed at keeping households in their homes or in obtaining housing quickly and increasing self-sufficiency
• One transition-aged youth program. This program included youth shelter, workforce development, housing placement, counseling, and preparation for higher education. • 20 new units of affordable housing were produced through partnering with local non-profit developers.
•
DRAFT
The Single-Family Repair Program assisted in preserving 6 units of affordable housing for lowEXHIBIT 1 1049 CAPER 28
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
income households by addressing healthy and safety repairs to keep these single-family homes habitable.

Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City of Stockton Economic Development Department is the lead agency responsible for the development of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. The Economic Development Department is also the primary agency responsible for the administration and management of programs and projects covered by these Plans.

During the 2024-2025 Program Year the City:
• Worked with housing developers to expand the availability of affordable housing. • Conducted Economic Review Committee (ERC) meetings with housing developers to streamline the process of new developments and rehabilitations.
• Continued efforts to update the grants management policies and procedures to minimize the City’s risk when making funding investments with local partners. • Continued to provide workshops and training to vendors and program applicants. • Continued to implement streamlined reporting and invoicing system for subrecipients. • Continued to update email lists to keep residents, business owners, and non-profits up to date on funding opportunities.
• Continued to participate in the San Joaquin County Continuum of Care meetings. • Continued implementation of the Housing Element and adopted a Housing Action Plan and Neighborhood Action Plans.
• Continued to work with affordable housing developers to ensure that their developments include the facilities to provide the services needed for the residents. • Uploaded handouts and program guidelines to the City’s website and utilized the City’s social media platforms to keep the public informed.
• The City’s Community Development Department (CDD) continued implementation of the Community Virtual Development Assistant Platform, which allows residents and investors to see zoning and allowable uses on an interactive map and anticipated permits, licenses, and resources for specific parcels.
• Worked collaboratively with the County and CoC to update the regional plan to address homelessness, adopt shared goals and have jointly applied for more than $30 million in funding. • Alongside Family Resource & Referral Center (FRRC), continued efforts to develop the CoC’s Coordinated Entry System (CES), The CES is designed to efficiently match people experiencing homelessness to available housing, shelter, and services. Through a coordinated partnership between all organizations and agencies serving the homeless in the community, CES identifies and prioritizes those who are most in need of assistance and provides crucial information that helps communities strategically allocate resources and identify gaps in service. •DRAFTAdopted a Language Access Plan that outlines the procedures City staff are taking to assure that EXHIBIT 1 1050
CAPER 29
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Limited English Proficiency community members can access HUD resources. • Updated the Citizen Participation Plan to integrate the Language Access Plan requirements and to better streamline the public participation and plan approval process. • Updated the Section 3 Plan to comply with HUD’s updated policies. The goal of the Section 3 Plan is to ensure that jobs and economic opportunities generated by HUD funded construction projects, to the greatest extent feasible (and consistent with existing Federal State, and local laws and regulations) are provided to low-income persons. • Provided technical assistance (on an “as requested” basis) to local non-profits to build the organizational capacity necessary for receiving State and Federal grants.

Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The City is an active partner with the San Joaquin County Continuum of Care (SJCoC), attending meetings regularly. The City continues to participate in numerous committees including Strategic Planning, Data and HMIS, Shelter, Coordinated Entry, and the Point In Time Count. The City leverages the SJCoC platform to facilitate coordination between housing and social services agencies and is committing State and Federal funding to strengthen and enhance local system capacity in the areas of Coordinated Entry and in effective use of data to set, analyze and work towards the successful accomplishment of local performance measures.

Key areas of focus include supporting the ongoing build out and implementation of the Coordinated Entry System and expansion of the Homeless Management Information System. The City is committed to supporting the continued success of the SJCoC and is:
• Allocating portions of the State’s HHAP grant toward the successful operations and growth of the CES and the HMIS.
• Investing in local capacity building for Stockton homeless service providers on the use of the CES, including the ability to share person-level data amongst homeless service providers such that intake efficiency is increased and redundancy amongst services will decrease. • Incorporating participation in the CES into contract agreements for new affordable housing developments to ensure that housing created through state and federal allocations are utilizing the CES to make housing placements.

The City also continues to have an active role in promoting a Housing First approach and is working in partnership with a technical service provider to frame a service rich understanding of Housing First (Housing First, not Housing Only).

The City continues to work in close partnership with the local Housing Authority (HASJC) and nonprofit housing developers to expand affordable and permanent supportive housing opportunities, with the most recent
DRAFT
completed project being Calaveras Quarters.

EXHIBIT 1 1051
CAPER 30
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) The 2020 Analysis of Impediments (AI) listed recommended actions for the City of Stockton to take to overcome any impediments identified. The items listed below includes each recommended action followed by the actions taken in 2024-2025 to address each item:

1. Use the Consolidated Plan and AI as mechanisms to increase awareness and participation in fair housing issues. The City should utilize the Consolidated Plan and AI adoption and implementation processes to raise community awareness of the identified barriers to fair housing choice. Hearings and public meetings associated with the planning and implementation should be advertised in the media and members of the public should be invited to participate and provide substantive input.

While this goal is applicable to the period in which the AI and Consolidated Plan is released for public comment, the City holds public meetings and hearings when planning and implementing new plans such as the Annual Action Plan and CAPER. Staff promotes public meetings and hearings through various means including but not limited to social media posts and the City’s website. The City meets this action by closely following Citizen Participation Plan requirements.

2. Periodically monitor progress toward implementation of the AI recommendations. City staff should utilize the existing Consolidated Plan reporting process to consistently monitor and track the progress made toward implementation. This could also include an annual report on the actions taken by area fair housing service providers, including an inventory of the services provided, the number of clients served, the results of fair housing testing, and a breakdown of fair housing cases by type, including evaluation of key client characteristics.

The City uses the annual CAPER to report on the progress and efforts to address the Analysis of Impediments identified in the 2020-2025 Consolidated plan. Each year the CAPER includes fair housing provider accomplishments.

3. Maintain links on appropriate pages of the City’s website that direct visitors to housing services and resources, fair housing information, and consumer information. Ensure that information regarding the housing services provided by the City and its partners, including SJFH, is available at designated locations throughout the community, including but not limited to City offices, public libraries, community and civic centers, and other public facilities, particularly those public offices frequented by members of vulnerable populations, such as the elderly, disabled, minorities, and lowincome households.

The City maintains a housing website that directs visitors to City housing services and resources. The City provides information regarding housing services provided by the City and its partners throughout the year
DRAFT
during community events, city offices, and community facilities throughout the City.

EXHIBIT 1 1052
CAPER 31
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
In 2024-2025, the City procured a new fair housing provider that will begin to provide fair housing and related services during program year 2025-2026.

4. Conduct annual trainings, seminars, and information sessions with key City staff who administer and oversee housing programs and code enforcement activities to ensure that these staff are able to accurately provide guidance and referrals with regard to fair housing and landlord-tenant issues.

During the 2024-2025 program year, the City of Stockton procured a new fair housing service provider.

As part of the launch of services by its new fair housing provider, City staff will update the website material and handouts as well and train staff on providing referrals to the new service provider. In addition, the provider will hold a series of education and outreach services through trainings and workshops within the community.

In June 2025, the City held its annual Contract Workshop for the upcoming 2025-2026 ESG and CDBG public service subrecipients. To reiterate the importance of AFFH, the City provided further technical assistance to future subrecipients on the practice of affirmatively furthering fair housing which is also incorporated through the City’s monitoring process throughout the program year.

5.. To the extent possible with limited funding, support SJFH in expanding access to its services by increasing the number of hours the office is open and the number of hours that the phones are answered.

During the 2024-2025 program year, the City of Stockton procured a new fair housing service provider.

The City selected a new vendor, called Project Sentinel, to provide fair housing services to the community in the 2025-2026 program year. Project Sentinel will be the fair housing provider for the Stockton area providing fair housing counseling, discrimination investigation, trainings to communitybased organizations, and public education workshops for tenants and landlords.

6. Continue to support and, where possible, expand programs that provide credit counseling, homebuyer counseling and education, and education on tenant rights and responsibilities for households entering or re-entering the rental market, such as formerly homeless households and those entering the homeownership market. This may include providing support to SJFH, as well as other agencies and organizations, including providing funding to continue and expand existing city programs.

The City annually makes public service funds available. Public service providers have the opportunity to competitively apply for CDBG funds via the City's annual public service NOFA to provide these services.

In addition, the City’s new fair housing provider provides homebuyer counseling and will make these services available to Stockton residents.

7. Collaborate with other local jurisdictions to explore additional funding sources that may be leveraged to develop and maintain a program for comprehensive fair housing testing. This should DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1053
CAPER 32
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
include a dialogue intended to identify the most appropriate provider of these services (e.g., SJFH), as well as to determine ways in which each jurisdiction can contribute, so as to preserve and expand the capacity of organization that administers the testing program.

The City’s new fair housing provider will provide comprehensive fair housing services including fair housing discrimination investigation, fair housing audits and testing, fair housing enforcement including education, outreach, mediation, and information and referral.

8. Maintain and intensify code enforcement efforts focused on identifying substandard housing units and ensure, to the extent practicable given available resources, supplemental funding for lowerincome households necessary to facilitate prompt and satisfactory remediation of identified issues and avoid displacement. Efforts should be coordinated with other appropriate code and law enforcement activities, as well as the provision of assorted supportive and fair housing services.

The City holds weekly cross departmental meetings to address substandard buildings, including housing.

The Collaboration on Risk Properties (CRP) meetings have representatives from Code Enforcement, Building, Fire, economic development and the attorney's office. The goal is to assist property owners in coming into compliance with building and life safety. If that course of action is not possible then staff create action plans to address the properties. The City also maintains the Single-Family Housing Repair Program which aims to preserve and improve the conditions of low-income households by providing rehabilitation services to address health and safety repairs.

9. Maintain and expand support necessary for fair housing service providers to conduct fair housing trainings, workshops, and information sessions for residents, property managers and landlords, providing appropriate translation services where possible and necessary.

In the upcoming program year, the City’s new fair housing provider, Project Sentinel provide quarterly educational workshops to tenants and landlords and provide trainings to staff of community-based organizations.

10. Work with financial institutions to encourage marketing of financial services to all segments of the community. For example, lenders in the subprime market were effective in utilizing community resources, local cultural brokers, and affinity group marketing strategies, which indicates that lenders operating in the prime market may also benefit from similar marketing approaches, which can improve access to financing for lower-income and minority populations.

Visionary Home Builders (VHB), a local City partner, provides clients with homebuyer education workshops, financial capabilities education, and financial literacy workshops. To organize these events, Visionary Home Builders partners with financial institutions to increase accessibility of financial services to low-income and minority populations.

Throughout the year, the City collaborates with local chambers of commerce whose membership DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1054
CAPER 33
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
includes financial institutions. Through this collaboration, the City seeks partnerships to encourage financial institutions marketing of financial services to lower-income populations.

11. Leverage the ongoing comprehensive amendment process to address potential barriers to affordable and fair housing, including those identified in the Housing Element. This may also include policies intended to encourage additional affordable housing development in areas of high opportunity, such as moderate- and above moderate-income neighborhoods, though policies should not be crafted in such a way as to discourage affordable housing in any location area otherwise deemed appropriate for residential uses.

The City continued to work with its housing partners to find affordable housing development opportunities throughout the city.

12. Pursue a comprehensive update of the City's development impact fees, including the Capital Facilities Fees and Community Development Department fees to ensure that the fees charged are commensurate with the impact and sufficient to offset departmental costs.

The Community Development Department (CDD) published the results of the 2024-2025 fee study.

Currently, the City has a Non-Residential Fee Deferral Program to stimulate economic development within the City of Stockton and assist developers with upfront development fees. In addition, the City waives Public Facility Fees for all affordable housing projects and all housing projects in the downtown area.

13. Continue to comply with applicable anti-discrimination requirements, including, but not limited to, all applicable federal regulations associated with the use of CPD grant funds under the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs.

The City maintains compliance with antidiscrimination requirements and passes off those same fair housing and antidiscrimination requirements to subrecipients by including language in the contracts that enforce antidiscrimination and fair housing practices. The City monitors and enforces antidiscrimination compliance via its ongoing monitoring of subrecipients and housing partners.

CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
The City uses several types of monitoring to ensure compliance with the various funding regulations, including annual certification of residency letters, formal site visit monitoring, phone calls and emails throughout the life of a project, quarterly reports, and reviewing performance reports and organization’s audits before and after funding.

DRAFT
Throughout the program year, the City assesses program
EXHIBIT 1 1055
CAPER 34
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
compliance through review of quarterly reports, quarterly invoicing, and continuous correspondence via phone, email, and virtual meetings.

For CDBG and ESG public service contracts, the City collected quarterly reports and invoices. The quarterly reports detail both the accomplishments and challenges our subrecipients are facing during the program year. The City requires that each invoice submitted not only details the transaction ledgers but includes all receipts and relevant backup documentation. This method allows the City to evaluate that each cost reimbursed is allowable, necessary, and reasonable. Moreover, by requiring invoices to be submitted in tandem with reporting, the City is able to monitor that deliverables are being met and are in line with the expenditures charged to the HUD program. The City also conducts a minimum of one on-site monitoring visit of CDBG and ESG subrecipients. During PY 2024-2025, the City’s monitoring focused on 2023-2024 subrecipient monitoring compliance. This monitoring resulted in the PY 2024- 2025 subrecipients updating their policies and procedures to assure adherence to the federal guidelines.

For the City’s Housing Rehabilitation Program monitoring, all single-family borrowers receive annual questionnaires to verify occupancy.

Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.

The City adheres to its Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) in providing for and encouraging public participation in the development, administration, and disbursement of its Federal funding. Public outreach is conducted to ensure that minorities, non-English-speaking persons, low- and moderateincome persons, persons with disabilities, and advocates for seniors, business stakeholders, homeless persons, populations for whom the programs are designed to serve, are aware of how to provide feedback.

Consistent with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan, the draft CAPER is made available for a 15-day public comment period. During the public comment period, the City hosts two public hearings to review and hear public comments on the 2024-2025 CAPER.

CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.

During the 2024-2025 program year, the City of Stockton did not make any changes to the program objectives outlined in the 2024
DRAFT -2025 Annual Action Plan.

EXHIBIT 1 1056
CAPER 35
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?
The City does not have open BEDI grants.
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.

Not Applicable
CR-50 - HOME 24 CFR 91.520(d)
Include the results of on-site inspections of affordable rental housing assisted under the program to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations Please list those projects that should have been inspected on-site this program year based upon the schedule in 24 CFR §92.504(d). Indicate which of these were inspected and a summary of issues that were detected during the inspection. For those that were not inspected, please indicate the reason and how you will remedy the situation.

Following monitoring exemptions provided in response to COVID-19, the City has begun planning a monitoring schedule and gathering materials to conduct a series of past-due inspections dating back to late 2019. With the COVID monitoring pause and staff turnover during 2019 to 2022, the City’s rental housing monitoring efforts were paused. As the City hired new staff in 2023, the City worked with its consultant, Moss Adams, to address backlogged monitoring, beginning with desk monitoring efforts of affordable housing projects. However, during PY 2024-2025, the City stopped changed course by working with a HUD appointed technical assistance consultant, ICF, to assist in updating its HOME rental housing monitoring policy. The updated rental housing monitoring policy will be completed over the next several weeks allowing the City to resume rental housing monitoring activities during PY 2025- 2026.

Provide an assessment of the jurisdiction's affirmative marketing actions for HOME units. 24 CFR 91.520(e) and 24 CFR 92.351(a)
In compliance with the City’s Affirmative Marketing Policy, the City requires owners of HOME assisted rental projects to advertise for tenants according to policies outlined in the City’s Affirmative Marketing Plan. The City also requires affordable housing partners to provide information and reference information regarding Affirmative Marketing, Federal Fair Housing, tenant rights, assisted housing, and correction of substandard conditions in tenant-occupied dwellings. The City’s Affirmative Marketing Policy lays out specific requirements for owners of each rental project completed, including solicitation of applications, special outreach, and marketing requirements.

Refer to IDIS reports to describe the amount and use of program income for projects, DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1057
CAPER 36
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
including the number of projects and owner and tenant characteristics During this program year, the City received $306,576.47 in HOME program income. Program income received will be committed to future HOME projects. The City did not draw HOME program income funds in PY 2024-2025.

Describe other actions taken to foster and maintain affordable housing. 24 CFR 91.220(k) (STATES ONLY: Including the coordination of LIHTC with the development of affordable housing). 24 CFR 91.320(j)
The City of Stockton seeks to continuously improve its programs and infrastructure to serve the community as best as possible through local, state, and federal partnerships. In addition to federal HUD funding, the City has utilized state funding such as Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program funds and Homeless Housing, Assistance Prevention (HHAP) program funds to foster the production of affordable housing units. In recent years, PLHA funds have been used to support several affordable rental housing projects including but not limited to Grand View Village and Sonora Square Apartments.

HHAP funds have also been utilized to support projects such as Villa d’ Flore and Park Center Apartments.

Moreover, when feasible, the City continues to partner with affordable housing developers to apply for state of California grant funds to leverage HUD funds for the production of affordable housing units for vulnerable populations.

The City of Stockton’s efforts to foster and maintain affordable housing earned the City a Pro-housing Designation from the California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) in April 2023.

This designation was determined by the community's commitment to build more housing and adopting policies whose end goal is to increase housing production to help meet the State's goal of 2.5 million new homes over the next eight years, with at least one million serving the needs of low-income Californians. The Pro-housing Designation allows the City to receive incentives such as additional points or other preferences in the scoring of competitive funding programs administered by the HCD. Due to the Pro-housing Designation, the City has been awarded a new funding source called the Pro-housing Incentive Pilot (PIP) Program which the City intends to use towards the production of new affordable housing units.

CR-58 – Section 3
Identify the number of individuals assisted and the types of assistance provided Total Labor Hours CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF
Total Number of Activities 1 0 0 0 0
Total Labor Hours 89
Total Section 3 Worker Hours 0
Total Targeted Section 3 Worker Hours
DRAFT
0 EXHIBIT 1 1058
CAPER 37
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Table 14 – Total Labor Hours
Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Public Housing Targeted Workers 1
Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Other Funding Targeted Workers.

Direct, on-the job training (including apprenticeships).

Indirect training such as arranging for, contracting for, or paying tuition for, off-site training.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance, coaching).

Outreach efforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts.

Division of contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate participation by Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with assistance in seeking employment including: drafting resumes,preparing for interviews, finding job opportunities, connecting residents to job placement services.

Held one or more job fairs.

Provided or connected residents with supportive services that can provide direct services or referrals.

Provided or connected residents with supportive services that provide one or more of the following: work readiness health screenings, interview clothing, uniforms, test fees, transportation.

Assisted residents with finding child care.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend community college or a four year educational institution.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend vocational/technical training.

Assisted residents to obtain financial literacy training and/or coaching.

Bonding assistance, guaranties, or other efforts to support viable bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with training on computer use or online technologies.

Promoting the use of a business registry designed to create opportunities for disadvantaged and small businesses. 1 Outreach, engagement, or referrals with the state one-stop system, as designed in Section 121(e)(2) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

Other.

Table 15 – Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program Narrative
The tables above reflect the
DRAFT
Section 3 data from the CDBG funded Town Center Studios project.

EXHIBIT 1 1059
CAPER 38
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

ESG SAGE CAPER
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1060
CAPER 39
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1061
CAPER 40
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1062
CAPER 41
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1063
CAPER 42
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1064
CAPER 43
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
PR-26
DRAFT EXHIBIT 1 1065
CAPER 44
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1066
CAPER 45
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1067
CAPER 46
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1068
CAPER 47
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1069
CAPER 48
OMB Control No: 2506
DRAFT
-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
EXHIBIT 1 1070

CITY OF

STOCKTON
2024-2025
Consolidated Annual
Performance and Evaluation
Report (CAPER)

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
AGENDA ITEM 15.3
SEPTEMBER 23, 2025
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 25-1004, Version: 1

ACCEPT BY MOTION THE INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF THE ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept by motion the independent audit of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2024.

Summary
This report transmits the final audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the year ended June 30, 2024 (Attachment A). The City received an unmodified (or “clean”) audit opinion validating the fair presentation of its financial position as of June 30, 2024. The ACFR reflects the City’s improved financial condition achieved through rigorous financial planning and use of its LongRange Financial Plan. The City’s net position (assets compared to liabilities) improved by $168.7 million or 9.0% from the prior fiscal year. During the audit, the auditors noted three findings related to the City’s internal control over financial reporting processes. On September 22, 2025, the Council Audit Committee will receive, review and take action on the independent audit of the ACFR and submit it to Council for acceptance.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City Charter (Section 1910) requires the City to have an annual audit conducted by an independent firm of Certified Public Accountants. The Charter further stipulates the audit is to be made in accordance with generally accepted audit standards for audits of public agencies. Federal and State grant agreements and bond indentures also require the City to have an annual audit. To ensure compliance with these requirements, the City contracts with an independent audit firm. The City’s external audit firm, The Pun Group, completed the independent audit and issued the audit report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.

Present Situation
The ACFR is a comprehensive document reflecting the financial position of all City operations and its related component units. The City prepared the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 ACFR in conformance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and with the additional requirements of presentation as set forth by the Government Finance Officers Association. The ACFR’s Transmittal Letter and Management’s Discussion and Analysis provide an overview and analysis of the financial activities of the year ended June 30, 2024. While the City’s focus tends to be on the General Fund, the audit includes an examination of all City funds.

City of Stockton Page 1 of 3 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1080
File #: 25-1004, Version: 1
General Fund Results
The General Fund continues to reflect the City’s sound management practices and prudent financial decisions as steady growth and improved financial results are evident in the audit report for FY 2023-

24. The ACFR financial statements reflect on page 23 the consolidated General Fund balance of $240.1 million in accordance with GASB 34 and include the Council-approved reserves. The full $240.1 million fund balance includes available and restricted fund balances for the General Fund as well as the Library, Recreation, Boat Launch, Entertainment Venues, Emergency Communications, and Pooled Investment funds. The total fund balance as presented is split into five categories: Nonspendable, Restricted, Committed, Assigned, and Unassigned. The City’s General Fund reserve policy calls for the City to maintain a 16.66% operating reserve (approximately two months of expenditure) and establishes additional reserves for known contingencies, unforeseen revenue changes, infrastructure failures, and catastrophic events.

Deficit Fund Balances
· The Parking Authority Fund continues to report an accumulated deficit fund balance of approximately $3.4 million, primarily due to the interfund loan from the Workers’ Compensation Fund as of June 30, 2024. This is due to an interfund loan borrowing from the Worker’s Compensation Fund for $8,915,000. It is in relation to the payoff of the 2006 Series A ESB bonds previously held in the City’s Debt Service Fund. The loan terms are set at 2%, biannual payments with anticipated payoff date of February 1, 2032. · The Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Private Purpose Trust Fund continues to report an accumulated deficit fund balance of approximately $54.3 million, driven by bonds payable outstanding as of June 30, 2024. This is an Agency Private Purpose Trust fund and not included in the City’s net position. The fund has a bonds payable balance that causes the fund balance deficit.

Independent Auditor’s Report on the Financial Statements The City’s external independent audit firm, The Pun Group, completed its review of the annual Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, and has issued an unmodified (or “clean”) audit opinion validating the fair presentation of the City’s financial position as of June 30, 2024. In the Independent Auditor’s Report (page 1 of the ACFR), the auditor has opined that the balances in the financial statements are presented fairly in all material respects and are in conformity with GAAP.

Audit Adjustments
Auditing standards require reporting any adjustments to the financial statements made by the independent auditor. The external auditor did not propose any additional audit adjustments that, in their judgment, could have a significant effect on the City’s financial statements.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 3 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1081
File #: 25-1004, Version: 1
Audit Findings
The auditors noted three findings related to the City’s internal control over financial reporting with the following deficiencies during the FY 2023-24 audit:

1. City’s Administrative Services Department: Staff turnover & high vacancies

2. Accounting Closing and Accuracy in Financial Reporting

3. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA)
Management Response: The City acknowledges the identified deficiencies and is dedicated to improving in these areas. Since 2020, the City has experienced a significant increase in grant funding and many of the grants are prepaid rather than reimbursement based. This distinction changes how the grant revenues should be recorded. When booking these entries for the year ended June 30, 2024, the City based the entries on the individual grants at the project level, whereas the prior year entries were booked at the account level and not specific to each grant. Continuing this more detailed calculation will ensure accurate reporting of grant revenues in the future.

The City continues to demonstrate progress towards improving its internal controls by updating financial policies and procedures, resolving old audit findings, and gaining familiarity with the financial system.

Other Outstanding Audits
The City prepares a separate Single Audit in conformity with the Federal Single Audit Act and guidance from the U.S. Office of Management and Budget regarding Audits of State and Local Governments. This report is due to the federal clearinghouse on or before March 31st each year. The Single Audit for FY 2023-24 is still in progress and is not expected to be submitted on-time due to the volume of federal grant funds currently being managed by the City.

Filings with the State Controller’s Office
The City prepares a City Financial Transactions Report to be submitted to the California State Controller’s Office by January 31, 2024. An extension was requested and granted to submit the report past its filing deadline. The report was completed and submitted on July 2, 2025.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
There is no financial impact associated with accepting this report.

Attachment A - The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 City of Stockton Page 3 of 3 Printed on 9/18/2025
powered by Legistar™
1082
FY 2023-24
Stockton, California
ATTACHMENT A 1083
ATTACHMENT A 1084
ANNUAL

COMPREHENSIVE

FINANCIAL REPORT

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED JUNE 30, 2024

CITY OF STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA
Prepared and Issued by
Administrative Services Department
Chad Reed
Deputy City Manager
Interim Chief Financial Officer
ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1085
ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1086
ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1087
ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1088
City of Stockton
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2024
Table of Contents
i
Page

INTRODUCTORY SECTION (UNAUDITED)
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................................................... i Letter of Transmittal ......................................................................................................................................................... v List of Principal Officials................................................................................................................................................. xi Organization Chart.......................................................................................................................................................... xii

FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditor’s Report on Financial Statements ............................................................................................. 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited)................................................................................................... 5 Basic Financial Statements:

Government-Wide Financial Statements:

Statement of Net Position................................................................................................................................... 17 Statement of Activities....................................................................................................................................... 18 Fund Financial Statements:

Governmental Fund Financial Statements:

Balance Sheet..................................................................................................................................................... 23 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position ............................................................................................... 24 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances ............................................................. 25 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Government-Wide Statement of Activities........................... 26 Proprietary Fund Financial Statements:

Statement of Net Position................................................................................................................................... 28 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position........................................................................ 32 Statement of Cash Flows.................................................................................................................................... 34 Fiduciary Fund Financial Statements:

Statement of Fiduciary Net Position .................................................................................................................. 41 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position................................................................................................ 42 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements...................................................................................................................... 45 Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited):

Budgetary Information
Budget Process....................................................................................................................................................... 103 Budget Basis of Accounting. .................................................................................................................................. 105 Budget Comparison Schedule
General Fund.................................................................................................................................................... 106 Federal Housing Grants Special Revenue Fund............................................................................................... 108 Special Grants Special Revenue Fund.............................................................................................................. 109 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1089
ii
City of Stockton
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2024
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited) (Continued):

Budgetary Information (Continued)
Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios:

California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") - Miscellaneous Plan.................................... 110 California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") - Safety Plan................................................. 112 PARS Enhancement Plan................................................................................................................................. 114 Schedule of Contributions – Pensions:

California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") - Miscellaneous Plan.................................... 116 California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") - Safety Plan................................................. 118 PARS Enhancement Plan................................................................................................................................. 120 Supplementary Information:

Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual - Capital Improvement Capital Projects Fund.................................................................. 123 Nonmajor Governmental Funds:

Combining Balance Sheet ...................................................................................................................................... 127 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances............................................... 130 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual:

State Housing Grants Special Revenue Fund................................................................................................... 133 Solid Waste and Recycling Special Revenue Fund.......................................................................................... 134 Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund ....................................................................................................................... 135 Measure K Streets Sales Tax Special Revenue Fund ....................................................................................... 136 Measure M Strong Communities Special Revenue Fund................................................................................. 137 Measure W Public Safety Tax Special Revenue Fund ..................................................................................... 138 Special Assessment Special Revenue Fund ..................................................................................................... 139 Development Services Special Revenue Fund................................................................................................. 140 Other Special Revenue Fund............................................................................................................................ 141 Transportation Development Act Special Revenue Fund................................................................................. 142 Public Facilities Impact Fees Capital Projects Fund ........................................................................................ 143 Stockton Public Financing Authority Debt Service Fund ................................................................................ 144 Nonmajor Enterprise Funds:

Combining Statement of Net Position .................................................................................................................... 146 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position......................................................... 150 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ..................................................................................................................... 152 Internal Service Funds:

Combining Statement of Net Position .................................................................................................................... 158 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position......................................................... 160 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ..................................................................................................................... 162 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1090
City of Stockton
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2024
Table of Contents (Continued)
iii
Page
Supplementary Information (Continued):

Custodial Funds:

Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position .................................................................................................... 169 Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position.................................................................................. 170 Schedule of Sources and Uses – Measures A and B.................................................................................................. 171

STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)
Statistical Section Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 173 Financial Trend Information:

Net Position by Classification................................................................................................................................. 174 Changes in Net Position ......................................................................................................................................... 176 Fund Balance, Governmental Funds....................................................................................................................... 180 Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds................................................................................................. 182 Tax Revenues by Source, Governmental Funds..................................................................................................... 186 Revenue Capacity Information:

Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property......................................................................... 188 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates........................................................................................................... 190 Principal Property Taxpayers ................................................................................................................................. 191 Secured Property Tax Levies and Collections........................................................................................................ 192 Water Sold by Customer Type................................................................................................................................ 193 Water and Wastewater Utility Rates....................................................................................................................... 195 Debt Capacity Information:

Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type ...................................................................................................................... 196 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding.......................................................................................................... 198 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt.......................................................................................... 199 Legal Debt Margin Information.............................................................................................................................. 200 Pledged-Revenue Coverage.................................................................................................................................... 202 Demographic and Economic Information:

Demographic and Economic Statistics ................................................................................................................... 205 Principal Employers ............................................................................................................................................... 206 Operating Information:

Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees By Function/Program/Department........................................ 207 Operating Indicators by Function/Program/Department ......................................................................................... 208 Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program/Department ..................................................................................... 211 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1091
iv
This page intentionally left blank.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1092
v
September 22, 2025
To the Honorable Mayor,
City Council, Audit Committee and the
Citizens of the City of Stockton, California
The Stockton City Charter, federal grant regulations, and agreements with investors require the City of Stockton, California (“City”) to publish a complete set of financial statements presented in conformance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and audited by a firm of licensed, certified public accountants. Under those requirements, we respectfully submit the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (“ACFR”) of the City of Stockton for the fiscal year (“FY”) ended June 30, 2024.

Responsibility for the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best of our knowledge, the data, as presented, is accurate in all material aspects; and is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds. This report contains all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to fully understand the City’s financial affairs.

An overview of the City’s financial activities for the fiscal year is discussed in detail in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) section of the ACFR.

PROFILE OF THE GOVERNMENT
The City of Stockton is located in the center of California's San Joaquin Valley and is the seat of San Joaquin County.

Stockton is located about 80 miles east of the San Francisco Bay Area and 40 miles south of Sacramento, California's Capitol.

One of the oldest cities in the State of California, Stockton was founded in 1849 and incorporated in 1850. In 1888, the voters approved Stockton's first local Charter, which was ratified by the State Legislature in 1889. The current Charter was approved by the voters in November 1922 and became effective in 1923. This Charter changed the city from a commission form of government to the current City Council-City Manager form of government. Under the Council-Manager form of government, the City Council has policy-making and legislative authority. Representatives from six districts are chosen by district elections, with the mayor being chosen by citywide election, for staggered four-year terms, with a two-term limit. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the City Council's policies and ordinances, appointing department heads, and overseeing the City’s operations. The City Council appoints the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor, and City Clerk.

The City Charter has been amended many times since 1922, with the most recent amendments approved by voters in November 2016. Those amendments eliminated city-wide voting for Council districts, modified the Mayor's compensation, powers, and duties, and made several changes related to budget and fiscal affairs.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1093
vi
The City provides a full range of municipal services, including police and fire protection, community development, economic development, affordable housing, public works and street maintenance, parks, recreational services, libraries, and water, wastewater, and stormwater utilities. The City serves approximately 55% of water accounts in the City while the California Water Service Company, an investor-owned company, provides water service to 42%, and San Joaquin County provides water service to the remaining 3%.

This report includes the Stockton Public Financing Authority's financial activity, a separate legal entity controlled by the City. The City reports the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton's financial statements as a private-purpose trust fund in these financial statements.

The Council is required to adopt an annual budget following a public hearing to review the proposed annual budget.

This annual budget serves as the foundation for the City's financial planning and control. The City prepares the budget by fund, function, and department, e.g., Police. Department heads may transfer budget appropriations within a department as they see fit. Transfers between General Fund departments, however, need City Council approval.

Outside the General Fund, the City Manager has the authority to transfer budget appropriations at the fund level.

THE LOCAL ECONOMY
The City encompasses nearly 65 square miles, is surrounded by the San Joaquin Valley's fertile lands and is home to the furthest inland deep-water seaport in California. The City has a well-diversified economic base that has evolved from its agricultural roots to become a regional center for commerce, including the second-largest transportation and logistics hub in the United States. In addition to the Port of Stockton, the city is equipped with a regional airport, a Burlington Northern Santa Fe intermodal facility, and interstate freeways. The University of the Pacific, California State University-Stanislaus-Stockton campus, Humphries College, and San Joaquin Delta Community College are all located in Stockton. Four school districts serve K-12 students within City limits.

In January 2024, Stockton's population was 317,204, according to the California Department of Finance, which represents an increase compared to last year's population of 319,731. The California Department of Finance also projects the San Joaquin County population will continue to increase at a rate of approximately 0.8% for the next several years. As the 11th largest city in California, Stockton is comparable in size to other cities such as Lexington, Corpus Christi, Irvine, and Orlando.

According to the California Employment Development Department, the unemployment rate in Stockton was 7.1% as of June 2024, compared to 7.2% in 2023. Per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the national unemployment rate was

3.9% for the same period.

As of June 2024, the median price for a detached single-family home in Stockton was approximately $435,000 which is a slight decrease compared to the previous year of $435,750.

FINANCIAL CONDITION HIGHLIGHTS
Financial results for the year compare favorably with budget estimates in most areas of the City's operations. For the General Fund, financial results for the year were better than estimated. Expenditures (including encumbrances and carryovers and other uses of funds) came in under budget. Revenues (including other sources of funds) were above budget estimates. As a result, the General Fund balance on June 30, 2024, was $240.1 million. The Working Capital operating reserve of $48.0 million comprises most of the unassigned funds. City Council designated reserves in the committed balance total $148.3 million (known contingencies reserves) and risk-based reserve categories of $11.0 million.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1094
vii
The City Council has a reserve policy that calls for the City to maintain a 17% operating reserve and establishes additional reserves for known contingencies, unforeseen revenue changes, infrastructure failures, and catastrophic events. Additionally, the policy sets an automatic process to deposit one-time revenue increases and expenditure savings into the reserves. These policies are consistent with the Government Finance Officers' Association (GFOA) best practice recommendations and Governmental Accounting and Standards Board (GASB) guidance.

The Statement of Net Position for the City is approximately $2.0 billion. The City's net position is roughly $168.7 million higher, or 8.97%, than the prior fiscal year, with most of the growth in Governmental Activities.

Governmental revenues and transfers totaled $547.7 million, while governmental expenses totaled $432.4 million.

Business-type revenues and investment earnings totaled $195.3 million, while expenses totaled $141.2 million.

Business-type activities’ net position increased by $53.3 million, or 7.62%, for an ending balance of $753.9 million.

The City's Long-Range Financial Plan
The City maintains a comprehensive and detailed 20-year Long-Range Financial Plan ("L-RFP"), which provides a long-term forecast for the City's General Fund and other funds' impacts on the General Fund. The L-RFP is a vital tool and reflects the City's commitment to fiscal health and sustainability. This financial model is used to evaluate the immediate impact of budgetary decisions and the ongoing costs of those decisions over multiple years. The LRFP was developed as part of the City's bankruptcy exit plan, or Plan of Adjustment, which included certain assumptions and agreements reached with creditors. Since its development, the L-RFP has become a dynamic tool that is updated based on current revenue and expenditure trends. Though the individual variables and assumptions may change over time, the L-RFP provides a consistent model to forecast the City's fiscal position.

A summary of the L-RFP is available in the City's Annual Budget:
https://www.stocktonca.gov/government/budget financial_reports/index.php For a more detailed analysis of the financial performance of the City, refer to the Management's Discussion and Analysis sections titled Financial Analysis of the City's Funds and General Fund Budgetary Highlights.

The City's Irrevocable Post-Employment Benefits Trust
On November 7, 2017, the City created an irrevocable post-employment benefits trust program, also known as an Internal Revenue Code Section 115 trust (Trust). This Trust is designed to pre-fund pension costs and to offset GASB 68 net pension liabilities. The ending balance in the trust as of June 30, 2024 was $80.2 million ($72.8 million General Fund). The Trust allows the City to set aside funds through a tax-exempt funding mechanism to mitigate long-term contribution rate volatility. The Trust will enable the city to control the assets and when the City utilizes them. Also, the statutory investment restrictions that apply to the City's investment portfolio do not apply to assets held in a post-employment benefits trust. The City will strive to accrue an amount in the Trust sufficient to fund annual CalPERS costs during economic downturns or other periods when annual revenues are forecast to be insufficient.

Access to the Financial Markets
The City has no long-term bonds backed by the General Fund. The last rating actions on the City's General Fundbacked debt was a Standard & Poor upgrade to "BB", with a continuing positive outlook in August 2018. In April 2019, Moody's issued an upgrade for the City's General Fund of "A3", from "Baa1". The City’s Wastewater utility-maintained ratings of "A" by Standard & Poor’s and “A+” by Fitch. In 2024, both Standard & Poor’s and Fitch re-affirmed the City’s Water debt ratings of “A” and “AA-”, respectively. The Parking Revenue Bonds are currently rated at BBB.

The City does not anticipate issuing any bonds backed by the General Fund.

In addition, there may also be a need to issue land-based debt to support residential and industrial/commercial development.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1095
viii

RESERVEPOLICIES
The City's General Fund reserve policy calls for the City to maintain a 17% operating reserve (approximately two months of expenditure) and establishes additional reserves for known contingencies, unforeseen revenue changes, infrastructure failures, and catastrophic events. The known contingencies include amountsto address staff recruitment and retention, prefund future CalPERS costs, and replace aging infrastructure and systems. The City’s Governmental Funds reported a combined ending fund balance of $667.1 million at the close of June 30, 2024, an increase of $56.1 million compared with the prior fiscal year. The General Fund balance in this report, as of June 30, 2024, was $240.1 million.

The policy establishes an automatic process to deposit one-time revenue increases and expenditure savings into the reserves. These policies are consistent with GFOA's best practice recommendations and GASB guidance.

The reserve policy is available on the City's website at:
https://www.stocktonca.gov/Documents/Government/Budget%20And%20Financial%20Reports/General_Fund_Re serve_Policy.pdf

DEBT POLICY AND ANNUAL CONTINUING DISCLOSURES
The City's debt policy is available on its website as follows:
https://www.stocktonca.gov/Documents/Government/Budget%20And%20Financial%20Reports/Financial%20Rep orts/Capital_Financing_Debt_Management_Policy.pdf
The City's annual financial disclosures are available on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's and Electronic Municipal Market Access website at http://emma.msrb.org.

INVESTMENT POLICY
The City adopts an investment policy annually that provides guidelines for the prudent investment of the City's cash balances. The City contracts with Public Financial Management for the day-to-day management of the City's long-term investment portfolio. The Administrative Services Department oversees both the City's long-term investment portfolio management and liquid cash requirements.

The City's investment policy is posted on the City's website:
https://www.stocktonca.gov/Documents/Government/Budget%20And%20Financial%20Reports/Financial%20Rep orts/Investment_Policy.pdf

CASH AND INVESTMENTS
The California Government Code and the City's investment policy adopted in compliance with that Code define how the City can invest its cash. The City's policy also outlines the principles for maximizing the City's cash management operations' efficiency while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City. The average overall return rate on funds not held by fiscal agents for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, was 2.77%. This amount includes both realized and unrealized gains distributed to funds. Absent unrealized Fair Market Value gains and Accrued Interest amounts distributed on June 30, 2024, distributed returns would have been 2.22%.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1096
ix

GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
The GASB establishes GAAP for local and state governments in the United States and Canada. Its counterpart for private-sector entities is the Financial Accounting Standard Board. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and state and federal regulators require that financial reports follow GAAP to receive an unmodified audit opinion. The GFOA and the California Committee on Municipal Accounting entail additional standards that govern disclosures in the ACFR.

GAAP requires management to provide a narrative overview and analysis discussing the City's financial position to accompany the basic financial statements. This narrative overview is called Management's Discussion and Analysis ( MD&A), which provides an analytical overview of the City's financial position for its significant funds, as defined by GAAP, on a government-wide basis. This letter of transmittal is intended to complement the MD&A and not to duplicate the MD&A. It provides additional qualitative information on impacts to the City to help improve the reader's understanding of the data presented in the ACFR.

The City's ACFR conforms to the requirements established by GAAP, the City's Charter, GFOA standards, and agreements with investors. The ACFR includes basic financial statements, footnotes, supplemental information required by GASB for GAAP financial reports, MD&A of the financial statements, the City's independent auditor's opinion regarding the conformance of the financial statements with GAAP, and other information required to conform to GFOA standards.

INDEPENDENT AUDIT
The City Charter, Article XIX, Section 1911, states: "after the close of the fiscal year, an annual audit shall be made of the City's funds. Such an audit shall be made by a firm of independent certified public accountants." The Pun Group, LLP, an independent firm of licensed, certified public accountants, has audited the City of Stockton's financial statements.

The purpose of the independent audit is to obtain reasonable assurance that the City's financial statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

The independent auditors issued an unmodified opinion for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.

SINGLE AUDIT REPORT TO FEDERAL GRANTING AGENCIES
A broader, federally- mandated "Single Audit," designed to meet federal granting agencies' needs, is also required. The standards governing Single Audit engagements require the independent auditor to report on the fair presentation of the financial statements and the audited government's internal controls and compliance with legal requirements, emphasizing internal controls and legal requirements involving the administration of federal awards.

The City prepares a separate single audit report in conformity with the Federal Single Audit Act's provisions as amended and U.S. Office of Management and Budget Uniform Guidance, "Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards." This report should be filed with the federal clearinghouse on or before March 31 each year.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1097

RISK MANAGEMENT
During FY 2023-24, the City continued its self-insurance program for General Liability, Property, and Workers' Compensation. The City is a member of the California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority for General Liability and All Risks Property Program, which is primarily underwritten by various insurance companies. The Property All Risks deductible is $250,000. The self-insured retention ("SIR") for General Liability is $1.25 million.

The City is also a member of the Public Risk Innovation, Solutions and Management insurance pool for excess Workers' Compensation coverage. The SIR is $500,000.

INTERNAL CONTROLS AND LIMITATIONS
The ACFR intends to provide the City Council and the public with an understanding of the City's financial position.

City management assumes responsibility for the completeness, accuracy, and reliability of the information presented in this report. City management established an internal control framework intended to protect the City's assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient, reliable information for the preparation of the City's financial statements.

The City's comprehensive system of internal controls continues to be the subject of an ongoing review to ensure the timeliness and accuracy of the ACFR and improve management reporting and controls. The City's Finance team, is working to close out prior audit findings and continually improve the City's key controls, systems, and policies and procedures.

Budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund and the fund level for all other funds. Transfers within funds and like categories of the same department require City Manager approval. Revisions to increase appropriation authority above a department's original adopted budget require City Council approval.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This report would not have been possible without the dedicated professionals in the Administrative Services Department and employees' cooperation from throughout the City who provided detailed information and other support and assistance.

We also want to thank the Mayor, City Council, and the Audit Committee for your interest and support in planning and conducting the City's financial operations responsibly and sustainably.

Respectfully submitted,
C REED

DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/

INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER
x
ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1098
xi

CITYOF STOCKTON

CITY COUNCIL
KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
MAYOR

KIMBERLY WARMSLEY

VICE MAYOR
District 6

MICHAEL BLOWER

COUNCILMEMBER
District 3

MICHELE PADILLA

COUNCILMEMBER
District 1

SUSAN LENZ

COUNCILMEMBER
District 4

DAN WRIGHT

COUNCILMEMBER
District 2

BRANDO VILLAPUDUA

COUNCILMEMBER
District 5
ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1099
City Manager

HARRY BLACK
City Auditor

MOSS ADAMS, LLP
Community
Services
Community
Development
Deputy City Manager I Deputy City Manager II Deputy City Manager II Economic
Development
Municipal
Utilities
Public Works
Administrative
Services
Human
Resources
Information
Technology
Police
Office of
Violence
Prevention Office of
Performance
and Data
Analytics
Fire

CITIZENS OF STOCKTON

CITY COUNCIL
Mayor KEVIN LINCOLN
Vice Mayor KIMBERLY WARMSLEY, District 6
Councilmember MICHELE PADILLA, District 1
Councilmember DAN WRIGHT, District 2
Councilmember MICHAEL BLOWER, District 3
Councilmember SUSAN LENZ, District 4
Councilmember BRANDOVILLAPUDUA, District 5
City Attorney

LORI ASUNCION
Interim City Clerk

EKATHERINE ROLAND
City Manager

HARRY BLACK
City Auditor

MOSS ADAMS, LLP
Deputy City Manager I
Public Works

CITY OF STOCKTON

ORGANIZATION CHART
AS OF JUNE 30, 2024
Municipal
Utilities
xii
Information
Technology
Office of
Performance
and Data
Analytics
Human
Resources
Economic
Development
Office of
Violence
Prevention
Fire
Administrative
Services
Community
Development
Community
Services
Police
Deputy City Manager II Deputy City Manager II
ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1100
6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 1200
Santa Ana, California 92707
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and the Members of the City Council of the City of Stockton
Stockton, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Stockton, California (the “City”), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2024, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of June 30, 2024 and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.

ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT A 1101
2 To the Honorable Mayor and the Members of the City Council of the City of Stockton
Stockton, California

Page 2 ends

City Council and Concurrent AuthoritiesSeptember 23, 2025

City Council and Concurrent Authorities
September 23, 2025