Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Suisun City City Council
December 16, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
December 16, 2025
Body
Suisun City City Council
Pages
7
Original file
49.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net. That file is the official record.

CITY COUNCIL
Alma Hernandez, Mayor
Jenalee Dawson, Mayor Pro Tem
Amit Pal, Councilmember
Parise Shepherd, Councilmember
Princess Washington, Councilmember

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

A G E N D A

REGULAR MEETING OF THE SUISUN CITY COUNCIL,

SUISUN CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY,

AND SUISUN CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2025
6:30 PM

Suisun City Council Chambers - 701 Civic Center Boulevard - Suisun City, California

.

MEETINGS ARE HELD IN-PERSON, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IS ALSO AVAILABLE VIA ZOOM

ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION:

WEBSITE: https://zoom.us/join
MEETING ID:
843 1221 7671
CALL IN PHONE NUMBER: (707) 438-1720

REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING BY EMAILING [email protected] (PRIOR TO 4 PM), VIA WEBSITE, OR ZOOM CALL IN PHONE NUMBER (707) 438-1720
(If attending the meeting via phone press *9 to raise your hand and *6 to unmute/mute for public comment.) (Next Ord. No. – 822)
(Next City Council Res. No. 2025 – 141)
Next Suisun City Council Acting as Successor Agency Res. No. SA2025 - 06) (Next Housing Authority Res. No. HA2025 – 11)

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hernandez

ROLL CALL
Council / Board Members

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION

1 1.

City Manager Update - (Prebula: [email protected]).

2. City Attorney Report - (Enright).

3. Proclamation Recognizing the Retirement of Sergeant Bob Szmurlo - (Roth:

[email protected]).

4. Presentation of Committee and Commission Updates
a
.

Measure S Committee
b
.

Economic Development Committee

5. Approving Appointment of Suisun City Mayor Pro Tem - (Hernandez:

[email protected]).

City Council

6. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-__ Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Karste Consulting Inc. to Update the City of Suisun City’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) - ([email protected]).

7. Council Approval of the Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem to Serve as Solano Transportation Authority (STA) Board Alternate and Solano County Water Agency (SCWA) Board Alternate
- (Prebula: [email protected]).

8. Receive and File SB-165 Annual Reports for Community Facilities District No. 1, Community Facilities District No. 2, and Community Facilities District No. 3, to Comply with the Local Agency Special Tax Bond and Accountability Act. - (Vue:

[email protected]).

9. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-__: Adopting the Updated 2025 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) and Designating the Legally Responsible Official (LRO) as Required by the State Board Water Discharge Requirements - (Vue - [email protected]).

10. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates for Staff Support Services Related to the Processing of Development Applications for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and Determining that the Action is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - (Caperton: [email protected]).

APPROVAL OF REORDERING OF AGENDA

CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION
(Any items on the regular meeting agenda that might be a conflict of interest to any Councilmembers / Boardmembers should be identified at this time.)

REPORTS (Informational items only.)

PUBLIC COMMENT
(Request by citizens to discuss any matter under our jurisdiction other than an item posted on this agenda per California Government Code §54954.3. Comments are limited to no more than 3 minutes unless allowable by the Mayor/Chair. Speaker cards are available on the table near the entry of the meeting room and should be given to the City Clerk. By law, no prolonged discussion or action may be taken on any item raised during the public comment period, although informational answers to questions may be given and matters may be referred for placement on a future agenda.)

PRESENTATIONS/APPOINTMENTS
(Presentations, Awards, Proclamations, Appointments).

CONSENT CALENDAR
2 11.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Fourth Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with First Carbon Solutions for Continued Services Preparing an Environmental Impact Report for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and Determining that the Action is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - (Caperton: [email protected]).

12. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement of Real Property Between the City of Suisun City and TC Property Management, LTD, and determining that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - (Caperton: [email protected]).

13. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___ Declaring Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0032-042-720, 0032-042-740, 0032-042-790, 0032-200-320, 0032-282-040, 0032-282-050, 0032-292-010 and 0173-684-010 surplus lands under the Surplus Land Act (SLA) (Government Code sections 54220 et seq.) - (Caperton: [email protected]).

14. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Reaffirming the Necessity of the Development Impact Fees and Accepting the Annual Report on Development Impact Fees - (Luna: [email protected]).

15. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Aligning Leave Cash Out Provisions for Temporary Full-Time Limited-Term Employees with IRS Constructive Receipt Requirements - (Penland: [email protected]).

16. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Implementing a 2.5% Cost-of-Living Adjustment for SCMPEA, SCPOA, SCPFA, Unrepresented and Executive Management Employees, and Temporary Full-Time Limited Term Employees Effective January 2, 2026 - (Penland: [email protected]).

Successor Agency

17. Successor Agency Adoption of Resolution No. SA2024-___: Receiving and Accepting a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule 2025-26 (ROPS) for the Period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 - (Deol: [email protected]).

Joint City Council / Successor Agency

18. Council/Agency Approval of November
2025 Accounts Payable and Payroll Warrants -
(Deol: [email protected]).

Joint City Council / Suisun City Council Acting as Successor Agency

19. City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority Approval of the Minutes of the Meetings of the Suisun City Council, Suisun City Council Acting as Successor Agency, and Housing Authority held on December 2, 2025 – (Skinner: [email protected]).

20. PUBLIC HEARING: Council Adoption of Ordinance No. ___ : An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Suisun City Repealing and Replacing Chapter 15.04 (Permits-Uniform Code) of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Suisun City Municipal Code, and Adopting by Reference Part 1 Administrative Code, Part 2 Building Code, Part 2.5 Residential Code, Part 3 Electrical Code, Part 4 Mechanical Code, Part 5 Plumbing Code, Part 6 Energy Code, Part 7 Wildland-Urban Interface Code, Part 8 Historical Building Code, Part 9 Fire Code, Part 10 Existing Building Code, Part 11 Green Building Code, Part 12 Referenced Standards Code, Including Related Appendices, as Identified, of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, 2025 Edition of the California Building Standards Code, Together with Certain Additions, Insertions, Deletions and Changes Thereto, and Making a

PUBLIC HEARING

3 Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act - (Kearns:

[email protected]).

21. PUBLIC HEARING: Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___; Approving Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) Application No. PLN 2025-00004, and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application No. PLN 2025-00021 to Subdivide Approximately 5.12 Acres of Land into Four (4) Parcels plus One (1) Remainder Parcel Ranging in Size from Approximately 0.95 Acres to 1.12 acres and Modified Development Standards on Property located North of Highway 12 and East of Sunset Avenue (APN 0173-390-200), and Determining that the Project is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Section 15315 (Class 15: Minor Land Divisions) of the CEQA Guidelines, which Exempts Minor Land Divisions of Four (4) or Fewer Parcels - (Kearns: [email protected]).

22. Approval of the Annual Assessment Report and Consideration of Reauthorizing the Suisun City Historic Waterfront Improvement District - (Hull: [email protected]) a
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-__: Reauthorizing and Renewing the Historic Waterfront Business Improvement District and the Assessment Levy for the District.
b
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-__: Approving the Proposed Calendar- Based Fiscal Year 2026 Operating Budget for the Main Street Waterfront Business Improvement District.

23. Community Action Partnership Solano Joint Powers Authority (CAP Solano JPA) - (Prebula:
[email protected]).
a
.

Introduction of Executive Director, DeShawn Waters, Community Action Partnership Solano Joint Powers Authority
b
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the Community Action Partnership Solano, Joint Powers Authority; Solano County; and the Cities of Benicia, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun City, Vacaville, and Vallejo to Partially Fund the Coordinated Entry System of Homeless Services.

24. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025 -

: Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a
Agreement with Paladin Drones for the Purchase of One Drone and One Year of Technical Support and Licensing in the Amount of $24,000 - (Lopez: [email protected]).

25. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025 -__: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Suisun City, California, Adopting Rules of Procedures and Conduct of Commissioners, Committee Members, and Board Members - (City Attorney).

26. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025 -__: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Suisun City, California, Amending Council Norms and Procedures - (City Attorney).

27. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025 -__: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Suisun City, California, Adopting a Social Media Policy - (City Attorney).

28. Non-Discussion Items.

GENERAL BUSINESS

COUNCIL COMMENTS

REPORTS: (Informational items only)

ADJOURNMENT

4 Public Access To Agenda Documents
A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item for the open session of this meeting, and provided to the City Council, are available for public review at least 72 hours prior to a Council/Agency/Authority Meeting at Suisun City Hall 701 Civic Center Blvd., Suisun City. Agenda related writings or documents provided to a majority of the Council/Board/Commissioners less than 72 hours prior to a Council/Agency/Authority meeting related to an agenda item for the open session of this meeting will be made available for public inspection during normal business hours. An agenda packet is also located at the entrance to the Council Chambers during the meeting for public review. The city may charge photocopying charges for requested copies of such documents. To the extent feasible, the agenda packet is available for online public viewing on the City’s website: https://www.suisun.com/Government/City-

Council/Agendas The City Council/Agency/Authority hopes to conclude its public business by 10:00 p.m. No new items will be taken up after 10:00 p.m., unless so moved by a majority of the City Council, and any items remaining will be agendized for the next meeting. The agendas have been prepared with the hope that all items scheduled will be discussed within the time allowed.

Accommodations
If you require an accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (707) 421-7302 or [email protected]. The City’s reasonable accommodation policy is available for review on the City’s website at www.suisun.com/government/city-council/, you may request an electronic copy or have a copy mailed to you. Please note that for accommodations that are not readily available, you must make your request as soon as you can prior to the time of the meeting.

Decorum
All participants are expected to conduct themselves with mutual respect. Conduct that disrupts meetings will be addressed in accordance with Section 54957.95 of the Government Code.

Ordinances
Ordinances are city laws contained in the Suisun City Municipal Code. Enacting a new city law or changing an existing one is a two-step process. Government Code 36934 provides, except when, after reading the title, further reading is waived by regular motion adopted by majority vote all ordinances shall be read in full either at the time of introduction or passage; provided, however, that a reading of the title or ordinance shall not be required if the title is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance is made available to the public online and in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage.

Certification Of Posting
Agendas for regular and special meetings are posted in accordance with the Brown Act at Suisun City Hall, 701 Civic Center Boulevard, Suisun City, CA. Agendas may be posted at other Suisun City locations including:

Suisun City Fire Station, 621 Pintail Drive, Suisun City, CA; Joe Nelson Center, 611 Village Drive, Suisun City, CA;
Harbor Master Office, 800 Kellogg Street, Suisun City, CA.

I, Ashley Nash, Administrative Assistant II for the City of Suisun City, declare under penalty of perjury that the above agenda was posted and available for review, in compliance with the Brown Act. 5 6
7 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
8 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

December 16, 2025

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-__ Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Karste Consulting Inc. to Update the City of Suisun City’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP).

FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost to update the Emergency Operations Plan is $10,800, based on the consultant’s proposal. Funding for this project will be provided through Acct. 310-9988-93310 and is available in the current fiscal year budget.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Goal A - Public Safety - Natural disaster Emergency Operations Plan and public communication.

BACKGROUND:

The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) is the City’s primary framework for coordinating preparedness, response, and recovery operations during emergencies and disasters. The purpose of the EOP is to provide clear direction to City departments, personnel, and supporting agencies regarding their roles and responsibilities before, during, and after an incident. The plan ensures a coordinated, efficient, and scalable response that protects life, property, the environment, and continuity of government services.

The City last completed a full review and update of its EOP in 2019. Periodic updates are critical to ensure the plan reflects current organizational structures, operational capabilities, state and federal guidance, and evolving community needs. Regular updates also help maintain compliance with emergency management standards and ensure the City remains eligible for state and federal disaster reimbursement.

Regulatory Requirements
While there is no single statute expressly mandating that a city adopt an EOP, several state and federal regulations make the development and maintenance of an emergency operations plan a functional requirement:

California Emergency Services Act (Government Code § 8607) requires local governments to develop emergency response plans consistent with the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). SEMS compliance is mandatory for eligibility for state disaster recovery funding.

SEMS Regulations (19 CCR § 2400–2450) establish the structure and components that must be integrated into local emergency plans, including the Incident Command System, mutual aid coordination, and multi-agency collaboration.

National Incident Management System (NIMS)—local jurisdictions must maintain NIMS- compliant emergency plans to remain eligible for federal preparedness grants and certain types of disaster assistance.

FEMA Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101 provides the national standard for developing emergency operations plans and is widely used to meet federal expectations for disaster readiness.
9 Collectively, these requirements make maintaining an updated, adopted EOP essential for both operational readiness and financial eligibility following disasters.

STAFF REPORT:

To complete the 2025 EOP update, City staff will partner with Karste Consulting, a qualified emergency management consultant. The consultant will lead the technical review, integrate best practices, update all plan components and annexes, and ensure compliance with SEMS, NIMS, and FEMA guidance. City staff will support this process by providing operational input, reviewing draft materials, participating in planning discussions, and validating final content to ensure the plan accurately reflects current City capabilities and procedures.

This collaborative approach will result in a comprehensive, compliant, and modernized Emergency Operations Plan that enhances the City’s preparedness and resilience.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Karste Consulting Inc. in the amount of $10,800 to update the City of Suisun City’s Emergency Operations Plan.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
1 .

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-__ Authorizing the City Manager, or his Designee, to Execute a Contract Agreement with Karste Consulting to Update the Emergency Operations Plan for the City of Suisun City (EOP).
2 .

City of Suisun City Proposal - EOP Update 2025

PREPARED BY:

Brad Lopez, Fire Chief
REVIEWED BY:

Brad L. Lopez, Fire Chief
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution Approving Agreement with Karste Consulting to update the Emergency Operations Plan.docx

2. City of Suisun proposal - EOP Update 2025.pdf
10 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY TO

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH KARSTE CONSULTING INC. TO UPDATE THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY’S EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN.

WHEREAS, the City of Suisun City is required by Government Code 8607 to develop and maintain an Emergency Operations Plan; and
WHEREAS, the last review and update of the city’s emergency operations plan was completed in 2019; and
WHEREAS, regular updates of the emergency operations plan will ensure the city remains eligible for state and federal disaster reimbursement; and WHEREAS, city staff will partner with Karste Consulting, a qualified emergency management consultant and
WHEREAS, the consultant will lead the technical review, integrate best practices, update all plan components and annexes, and ensure compliance with SEMS, NIMS, and FEMA guidance; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Suisun City authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Karste Consulting Inc. to update the City of Suisun City’s Emergency Operations Plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into any agreement or take such actions as may be necessary to implement the Council’s actions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, December 16th, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: _______________________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: _______________________________________________ ABSENT: Councilmembers: _______________________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: _______________________________________________

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of December 2025.

___________________________________
Anita Skinner
City Clerk
11 Proposal /City of Suisun Page 1
Page1

City of Suisun
Emergency Operations Plan -Update

Proposal | November 2025

12 Proposal /City of Suisun Page 2
Page2
Table of Contents

Letter of Introduction 3 Key Personnel 4 Scope of Work 5-6 Cost Proposal 7 Project Assumptions and Constraints 8-9

13 Proposal / City of Suisun
Page3

11/20/2025

Subject: City of Suisun Emergency Operations Plan -Update

Dear Chief Lopez

Karste Consulting Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal in response to your request for a consultant to update the City of Suisun’s Emergency Operations Plan. Karste Consulting has been providing disaster and emergency planning services for its clients since 2011.

Karste Consulting greatly appreciates this opportunity to submit this proposal and looks forward to developing contractual terms and conditions for the scope of work. Should you have any questions regarding our proposal, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 925- 382-9467 or via email at [email protected]

Sincerely,
Roland Karste
Roland (Lonnie) Karste
Karste Consulting, Inc.

President

14 Proposal / City of Suisun
Page4
Key Personnel

Karste Consulting brings to the City of Suisun a team of highly qualified and experienced emergency management professionals with years of experience in reviewing and developing:

1. Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans.

2. Designing Emergency Operation Centers.

3. Training staff in disaster preparedness and Incident Command.

4. Communication plans.

5. Facility / Site assessments.

6. Exercise design and execution.

7. The following is a summary of the principal’s qualifications. A detailed resume for Mr. Karste can be found on www.karsteconsulting.com

• Roland (Lonnie) Karste will serve as principal in charge and brings over 25 years’ experience in the field of emergency management. With extensive course training from the California Specialized Training Institute (CSTI); including the following Certifications: Earthquake Preparedness School; Emergency Operations Center Design; Disaster Planning; Public Information; Terrorism School; Emerg ency Plan Development Updates Training; SEMS and NIMS Instructor Training Program; OES training update workshops and Red Cross Shelter Management. A few of our past clients include, the City of Antioch, Antioch Unified School District, COMCAST, City of Martinez, Novato Unified School District, City of Berkeley, City of Pittsburg, City of Pinole, City of Pleasant Hill, USS POSCO and Tri Delta Transit. Mr. Karste received his Bachelor and Master's Degrees from the University of San Francisco in Public Administration.

15 Proposal / City of Suisun
Page5

Scope of Work

Task 1: Initiate Project Planning Meeting

Project Planning Meeting . Karste Consulting will initiate the project support by conducting a project planning meeting with the City of Suisun primary point of contact (POC). During this meeting, Karste Consulting and City of Suisun will establish the objectives that will define the City of Suisun’s emergency operations planning process, determine project schedule / milestones.

Together, Karste Consulting Inc. and the City of Suisun (POC) will accomplish the following:

• Confirm the project objectives, schedule, and planning assumptions. • Identify the key City of Suisun staff that have the subject matter expertise to fill in critical gaps in the draft plan. I.e., Area hazards, community resources, staffing levels and capabilities Public Information communication systems available, and any other key issues regarding the community and its ability to respond to an event.

Work Plan. Within 5 days of the project planning meeting, Karste Consulting Inc. will deliver and review a detailed work plan with the City of Suisun (POC) which will identify the goals, objectives, and scope of the Emergency Operations Plan project. Once approved, the work plan will guide the development, execution, and follow-up phases of the project. Karste Consulting Inc. will collaborate with the City of Suisun (POC) to identify and confirm critical meeting and project milestone dates.

Task 2: Develop the Emergency Operations Plan Process

Karste Consulting Inc. will support and facilitate the development of the updated “Draft” Emergency Operations Plan. Karste Consulting Inc. will make recommendations for contents of the updated Emergency Operations Plan for the City of Suisun. This draft plan will provide instructions for key City of Suisun staff on how to fill in critical gaps in the assigned sections of the plan. Karste Consulting Inc. will help deliver a draft plan for the City of Suisun team to review and discuss.

The following will be utilized to develop the “Draft” Emergency Operations Plan.

1. Review the existing City of Suisun Emergency Operations Plan documen t - provided by the City of Suisun.

2. Determine if the level of information found within this above referenced document is sufficient to be used within this new updated plan document.

3. Review and identify area hazards that could impact this community.

4. Use a sample City EOP plan template as the plan format. 16 Proposal / City of Suisun
Page6

5. Meet with key city staff to determine the capabilities of the City of Suisun to respond to an event.

6. A review of the current Emergency Operations Center and resources available.

The City of Suisun /POC will distribute specific subject/topic materials found in the Draft Plan Document to key City of Suisun staff to do the following:
• Review and comment upon the updated “draft” Emergency Operations Plan • Review Plan Organizational Structure and requirements. • Understanding of training and exercise requirements.
• Review budgetary impacts of plan development as it pertains to the City of Suisun • Complete the required areas of information as determined by Karste Consulting Inc.

Task 3: Completed Draft Emergency Operations Plan - Orientation Workshop

Karste Consulting Inc. will collect additions/comments made in the updated “: Draft ” Emergency Operations Plan Document from the City of Suisun POC and compile info/data into the draft plan.

Karste Consulting will deliver and review highlights of the draft plan with the City of Suisun POC. Karste Consulting will conduct an on-site 60-minute Orientation Workshop with key City of Suisun personnel.

The Orientation Workshop will help key personnel have a fundamental understanding of the components of the updated draft plan.

17 Proposal / City of Suisun
Page7
Cost Proposal

Karste Consulting proposes performing the project for a firm fixed price of $10,800. The fixed price is based on Karste Consulting ’s experience performing this type of Emergency Operations Planning projects of similar scope and complexity. The fixed price is derived from estimating the number of work hours for each task and budgeting for travel expenses for on-site meetings. Business license fees if required will be billed as a reimbursable cost.

Deliverables

1. Update Emergency Operations Plan – Final Draft
a. Base Plan
b. Functional Annexes
c. Tools and supporting documents
i. NIC specific City of Suisun -contact information, vendor listings, community contacts, facilities, care and shelter partners, maps, agency MOUS etc.

2. Updated Emergency Operations Plan Key Staff Orientations

Schedule

1. This updating of the current Emergency Operations Plan is projected to require 90 days to complete. This is based upon the ability of the City of Suisun to meet all scheduled meetings and commenting requirements.

2. Once the Initial Planning Meeting date is established – the 90 days will commence.

3. All modifications to the established schedule will be submitted in writing by either party.

18 Proposal / City of Suisun
Page8
Project Assumptions and Constraints

This project is based on the following key assumptions and constraints:

• Primary Point of Contact. The City of Suisun will assign a primary point of contact (POC) to address administrative and functional issues.
• Access to Materials/Plans. Documentation that is deemed pertinent to the emergency operations of the City of Suisun will be made available to Karste Consulting Inc. for review, upon request, in electronic format.
• Coordination and scheduling: Will be based upon mutual agreement for said meetings. • Number of onsite meetings: Maximum of 4 onsite visits - all other meeting will be done virtually. • Additional Onsite meetings if needed: Will be scheduled if needed additional charges will be agreed upon prior to these meetings being scheduled and an add- service amendment will be provided in writing by KC Inc.
• Plan Orientation Workshop: to be scheduled – 60 minutes. • City of Suisun (POC): will actively participate in the collection of information for city staff, scheduling of meetings with key staff, contact with the Solano County Operational area. • Deliverables. Karste Consulting agrees to deliver the following:
o Electronic copies of the draft plan document throughout the planning process. o All draft deliverables will be provided by Karste Consulting Inc. 15 days prior to any meeting. • Copying: All copying required will be provided by the client. • City of Suisun will provide: staff /administrative support to help organize and draft the final plan document and create copies.
• City of Suisun Team will be asked to provide: Several key pieces of information that pertain to this community and their operations to fully develop this plan. • Work Location/Meeting Space: The City of Suisun will provide meeting room space to conduct on- site meetings. Karste Consulting Inc. will perform work off-site except when required to be on-site for meetings.
• Acceptance of Deliverables : Deliverables will be submitted to the City of Suisun/POC in draft format to be finalized by their team. The City of Suisun comments should be provided within 10 business days to meet the period of performance timeframe. Upon incorporation of revisions to the draft deliverable and one final resubmission to the City of Suisun, the deliverable will be considered accepted. Revisions received after the Task 3 comment period will be subject to mutual agreement of both parties.
• Payment Plan Based on Deliverable. The City of Suisun will be invoiced in 3 equal progress payments based upon services rendered. Upon incorporation of comments and edits to the draft deliverable and resubmission to the City of Suisun, such deliverable will be considered accepted and the final progress payment will be due. Invoice payment terms are net 15 days unless otherwise agreed upon.
• Terms and Conditions. This proposal is contingent on the acceptance of a final agreement with mutually acceptable terms and conditions.
19 Proposal / City of Suisun
Page9
• Costs: All labor, lodging, transportation costs are included in this proposal. (Business License fees will be billed as a reimbursable)
• Cancellation of any scheduled meetings by the client: Must be done in writing with a minimum of 48 hours’ notice (400.00 cancellation fee will be charged if within the 48-hour window) • Proposal. This proposal is based on Karste Consulting’s current understanding of the project.

Revisions desired by the City of Suisun will be subject to mutual agreement.

The undersigned agree to accept the following proposal and all the assumptions and constraints.

Authorized City of Suisun

Print Name: ________________________________

Signature: __________________________________

Date: __________

Authorized Karste Consulting Inc. Representative

Print Name: Roland Karste -President

Signature: __________________________________

Date: _____________

20 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

December 16, 2025

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Approval of the Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem to Serve as Solano Transportation Authority (STA) Board Alternate and Solano County Water Agency (SCWA) Board Alternate.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There will be no impact to the General Fund as a result of this item.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Provide Good Governance.

BACKGROUND:

The Solano Transportation Authority, established in 1990, is a regional agency managing transportation planning, funding, and project delivery for Solano County. It works with local, state, and federal partners to improve mobility and safety. The STA Board is comprised of the mayors of all Solano County cities and a member of the Solano County Board of Supervisors.

The Solano County Water Agency provides untreated wholesale water to cities and agricultural districts while also overseeing flood control and water resource management in the region. Its Board of Directors includes the mayors of all Solano County cities, the five members of the Solano County Board of Supervisors, and representatives from three agricultural districts. Historically, the Mayor Pro Tem of Suisun City has served as the alternate representative to both the STA and SCWA boards, stepping in when the Mayor is unavailable.

STAFF REPORT:

In December of each year, the Mayor, with the consent of the City Council, appoints a Mayor Pro Tem. The Mayor Pro Tem serves as the alternate board member for both STA and SCWA, representing Suisun City in the absence of the Mayor.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council Approve the Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem to Serve as Solano Transportation Authority (STA) Board Alternate and Solano County Water Agency (SCWA) Board Alternate.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

None

PREPARED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:
.
21 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
22 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

December 16, 2025

AGENDA ITEM:

Receive and File Senate Bill (SB) 165 Annual Reports for Community Facilities District No. 1, Community Facilities District No. 2, Community Facilities District No. 3, and Community Facilities District No. 5 to Comply with the Local Agency Special Tax Bond and Accountability Act.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no discernable impact to the General Fund from the filing of the Senate Bill (SB) 165 Report. The filing is required by law.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Provide Good Governance.

BACKGROUND:

The Local Agency Special Tax Bond and Accountability Act (the “Act”), enacted by Senate Bill (SB) 165, is codified in California Government Code Sections 50075 through 50077.

The Act imposes accountability requirements with respect to any local bond special tax subject to voter approval. These requirements only apply to local agencies that have imposed special taxes or issued bond measures subject to voter approval after January 1, 2001.

Relevant excerpts from California Government Code are provide below:
1 .

California Government Code, Section 50075.3 states the chief fiscal officer of the levying local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002 and at least once a year thereafter. The annual report shall contain both the following: (a) The amount of funds collected and expended; and (b) The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in Section 50075.1(a).
2 .

California Government Code, Section 50075.1(a) requires a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax.

STAFF REPORT:

The City currently has four (4) Community Facilities Districts which have imposed special taxes subject to voter approval after January 1, 2001. These Districts are:

Community Facilities District No. 1
Community Facilities District No. 2 (and Tax Zones)
Community Facilities District No. 3
Community Facilities District No. 5 (and Tax Zone 1)

The Chief Fiscal Officer of these districts hereby submits the annual reports for each of these Districts.

Community Facilities District No. 1 provides public safety services that consist of those direct and incidental expenses required for the providing of police services within the Community Facilities District No. 1 (District 1) boundary. In Fiscal Year 2024-25, District 1 collected $161,651.10 and expended $165,700.12. The cash balance at year end was $14,111.62 and the status of the District 1 is on-going.

Community Facilities District No. 2 (District 2) provides certain police, fire, paramedical, storm drain 23 and landscaping maintenance services. In Fiscal Year 2024-25, District 2, which includes Tax Zones 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6, collected $1,029,049.49 and expended $1,080,148.03. The cash balance at year end was $72,281.03 and the status of District 2 is on-going.

Community Facilities District No. 3 (District 3) provides police services, fire services, paramedical services, services for the maintenance of parks, parkways and open space (landscaping), and services for the maintenance of storm drains. In Fiscal Year 2024-25, District 3 collected $81,187.86 and expended $70,251.43. The cash balance at year end was $20,780.22 and the status of District 3 is on-going.

Community Facilities District No. 5 (District 5) provides police services, fire services, paramedical services, services for the maintenance of parks, parkways and open space (landscaping), services for the maintenance of storm drains, dredging maintenance, streetlight maintenance and related appurtenances within or adjacent to District 5. In Fiscal Year 2024-25, District 5, which includes Tax Zones 1, collected $77,117.92 and expended $67,139.34 The cash balance at year end was $9,978.58 and the status of District 5 is on-going.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Senate Bill (SB) 165 Annual Reports for Community Facilities District No. 1, Community Facilities District No. 2, Community Facilities District No. 3, and Community Facilities District No. 5 to Comply with the Local Agency Special Tax Bond and Accountability Act.

PREPARED BY:

Amanda Dum, Management Analyst II
REVIEWED BY:

Nouae Vue, Public Works Director & City
Engineer
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Senate Bill (SB) 165 Annual Report for Community Facilities District No. 1.

2. Senate Bill (SB) 165 Annual Report for Community Facilities District No. 2.

3. Senate Bill (SB) 165 Annual Report for Community Facilities District No. 3.

4. Senate Bill (SB) 165 Annual Report for Community Facilities District No. 5. .
24 Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report for:

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services
October 2025
25 TABLE OF CONTENTS

District Summary ................................................................................................................... 1

1. SB 165: Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act ........................................ 1

2. Special Tax Analysis ........................................................................................................ 3

2.1 Levy Summary ........................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Special Tax Rates ....................................................................................................... 4

2.3 Annual Special Tax Rate Increase .............................................................................. 4

2.4 Annual Appropriations Limits .................................................................................... 4 Appendix A. District Boundary ............................................................................................... A Appendix B. Ordinance No. 664 ............................................................................................. B Appendix C. Final Billing Detail Report ................................................................................... C

26 City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 1 1

DISTRICT SUMMARY
On July 16, 2002, the City Council of the City of Suisun City established Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) (the “CFD”) under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code.

The type of public safety services to be financed by the CFD and pursuant to the Act shall consist of those direct and incidental expenses required for the providing of police services within the CFD boundary.

The boundaries of the CFD are generally located east of Walters Road, north of Bella Vista Drive, south of Easy Tabor Avenue, and west of the greenbelt and detention basin created for the District.

Levy
The following table provides a summary of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 final levy amount.

District
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26
Levy
Community Facilities District No. 1 450 $166,372.28

NBS
Ingrid Mijangos, Administrator
Melissa Ellico, Project Manager
Sara Mares, Client Success Ambassador
27 City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 1 2

1. SB 165: LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND BOND

ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). This Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001, in accordance with Section 50075.1 of the California Government Code.

Some of the requirements of the Act are handled at the formation of the Special Tax District and others are handled through annual reports. This Section of this report intends to comply with Sections 50075.3 of the California Government Code that states:
“The chief fiscal officer of the issuing local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter. The annual report shall contain both of the following:

1. The amount of funds collected and expended.

2. The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Sections 50075.1.”
The requirements of the Act apply to the Funds for the following:

City of Suisun
Community Facilities District No. 1

Purpose of Special Tax
The special tax provides funding for facilities and services provided and financed by Community Facilities District No. 1 include public safety services that consist of those direct and incidental expenses required for the providing of police services within the Community Facilities District No. 1 boundary.

The project(s) are ongoing.

Collections and Expenditures
Fund Name
6/30/2024
Balance (1)
Amount
Collected (2)
Amount
Expended (2)
6/30/2025
Balance (2)
CFD No. 1 $18,160.64 $161,651.10 $165,700.12 $14,111.62 (1) Audited balance for Fiscal Year 2024/25.
(2) Unaudited amounts subject to Fiscal Year 2025/26 Audit. 28 City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 1 3

2. SPECIAL TAX ANALYSIS

2.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table and chart below.

Description Amount
Personnel and Administrative Costs $161,267.27
Special Tax Consultant Services 3,448.89
County fees (1) 1,656.12
Prior year delinquencies (2) 0.00
Total Special Tax Levy Amount: $166,372.28
Levied Parcel Count 450
(1) Includes County collection fees and installment rounding for tax roll purposes. (2) The Special Tax Requirement includes curing delinquencies from prior year non-payments, this is not applicable since the District is on Teeter and receives a full apportionment of funds.

Special Tax Consultant Services2%Personnel and Administrative97%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 29 City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 1 4

2.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below:
(1) Non-residential units is per 10,000 square feet of lot area.

2.3 Annual Special Tax Rate Increase
The Maximum Special Tax for future years is authorized to automatically increase based on the average Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco - Urban Wage Earners Category and the National Consumer Price Index (U.S. City Average - Urban Wage Earners Category). Ordinance 664 states that the Maximum Special Tax shall be increased each year by using the Consumer Price Index as of the end of the prior year. The average consumer price index increase from end of year 2024 to 2025 was 2.810%.

2.4 Annual Appropriations Limits
The Annual Appropriations Limit was established at $158,100 in 2002 when the District was formed and has been increased by the above inflationary factor. The increase for the most recent five years is as follows:

Fiscal Year Percentage Increase Annual
Appropriations Limit
2021/22 1.37% 237,041.62
2022/23 4.68% 248,134.00
2023/24 7.40% 266,495.84
2024/25 3.57% 276,015.07
2025/26 2.81% 283,771.41

Land Use Classification
Parcel
Count Units
FY 2025/26
Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26
Applied
Tax Rate
Total FY
2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family Detached 449 449 $358.97 $358.96 $161,173.04 Single Family Attached 0 0 269.23 0.00 0.00
Multi-Family 0 0 134.61 0.00 0.00
Non-Residential 1 5.7934 (1) 897.44 897.44 5,199.24
Totals: 450 $166,372.28
30 City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 1 A APPENDIX A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY

The following pages provide the CFD’s Boundary Maps.

31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 1 B APPENDIX B. ORDINANCE NO. 664

The following pages provide Ordinance No. 664 which contains the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the CFD.

39 JUL-27-05 10.17 FROM-CITY OF SUISUN CITY 1D-7074293756 PAGE 2/9 l
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
10 17
18 19
20 21
--.---- --
23 24
25 26
27 28

SECTION I
ORDINANCE NO. 664

PURPOSE, INTENT AND AUTHORITY

AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY ESTABLISHING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
(PETERSON RANCH PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES)

AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

It is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to establish Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) ("CFD") and authorize the levy of a special tax on owners of real property within the CFD in order to provide funding for Public Safety Services within the CFD.

This ordinance is adopted pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act").

SECTION II. REQUIRED ACTIONS
The City Council adopted Resolution 2002-60 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Suisun City of Formation of Community Facilities District No. I (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services)" (the "Resolution of Formation"), ordering the formation of the CFD, authorizing the levy of a special tax on property within the CFD and establishing an appropriations limit for the CFD in accordance with the Act.

The City Council, under the provisions of the Resolution of Formation and pursuant to Resolution 2002-61 entitled "A Resolution Calling Special Election" (the "Election Resolution"), submitted the propositions of the levy of the special tax and the establishment of the appropriations limit to the qualified electors of the CFD as required by the provisions of the Act.

The City Clerk, pursuant to the terms of the Election Resolution, conducted the special election ad has 6n 1le a "Canvass ad Statement of Results of Elect" (tie "anvass.

The Council approved the Canvass and found the issues presented at the special election were approved by the qualified electors of the CFD by more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast at the special election.

The City Council, adopted Resolution 2002-62 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Suisun City Declaring Results of Special Election and Directing Recording of Notice of Special Tax Lien" ("Election Resolution") declaring the CFD to be fully formed with the authority to levy the special taxes, to have the established appropriations limit of $158,100 initially and increased for inflation annually, and to have the City Clerk 1 40
JUL-27-05 10.16 FROM.CITY OF SUISUN CITY 1D.7074293758 PAGE 3/9 execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Solano a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Act.

A.No Majority Protest, The proposed special rax to be levied within the CFD was not precluded by majority protest pursuant to section 53324 of the Act.

B_ Proceedings Valid, All proceedings taken by the City Council in connection with the establishment of the CFD and the levy of the special tax were duly considered and found and determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act.

C. Name of CED. The community facilities district designated "Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services)", City of Suisun City, County of Solano, State of Califoria (the "CFD"), was established pursuant to the Act. l
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
SECTION III. FINDINGS
10] D, Boundaries of CED, The boundaries of the CFD, as set forth in the map of the CFD recorded in the Solano County Recorder's Office on June 5, 2002, in Book 20 at Page 44 as 11 Document 71705 of Assessment District Maps, were approved and incorporated herein by reference and shall be the boundaries of the CFD.

F. Incidental Expenses. The types of incidental expenses to be incuned and paid from proceeds of the special tax in each annual levy shall be:

E. Types of Public Safety Services. The type of Public Safety Services to be financed by the CFD and pursuant to the Act shall consist of those expenses required to provide Police Services inside the boundary of the CFD. The City Council shall be authorized and directed to enter into joint services agreements with any entity that will provide Public Safety services as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 53316.2(b) of the Act. The City Council shall declare that such joint agreements will be beneficial to residents in the area of the CFD.

I. Boundary Map preparation and recording services.

2. Personnel and administrative costs of the City.

3. Special Tax Consultant services.

4. Publishing, mailing and posting of notices and ballots.

5. Governmental notification and filing costs.
994l6. Costs- efposting and collecting-the -speeial taxes:-- -----.---I 12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
23 24
25 26
27 28
G Special Tax Except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs of providing the Public Safety Services to the CFD and the incidental expenses thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all nonexempt real property in the CFD, will be levied annually within the CFD, and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, or in such other manner as this City Co uncil or its designee shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax among the parcels of real property within the CFD are described in Section III Rate and Apportionment of Special Tax, and in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed CFD to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay. Reference is hereby made to the provisions of Section III Rag 2 41
JUL-27-05 10.16 FROM-CITY OF SUISUN CITY ID.7074293756 PACE 4/9 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 ·-··--·•---�
23 24
25 26
27 28
and Apportionment of Special Tax relating to Special Taxes to be levied upon any parcel of property in the CFD used for private, residential purposes, which provisions are hereby expressly incorporated by this reference.

H. Limitation of Special Tax. In accordance with Section 53313 of the Act, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the amount of the special tax and the aggregate amount of the proceeds expected to be generated by the levy and collection of the special tax does not exceed the estimated cost and expense of providing increased levels of Public Safety Services to the presently undeveloped property within the CFD No. I which will result from the intended development of the property hereafter with structures for both residential and non-residential occupancy and habitation.

I_ Tax Lien. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of Califomia, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the CFD and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is satisfied.

J, Reimbursement of Advances. Advances of funds or contributions of work in kind from any lawful source, specifically including but not limited to general fund resources of the City and owners of property within CFD No. I, may be reimbursed from special tax revenue or both to the extent of the lesser of the value or cost of the contribution, but any agreement to do so shall not constitute a debt or liability of the City or of CFD No. I.

K Exempt Property, Except as may otherwise be provided by law or by the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax for the CFD, all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States, the State of California, or any departments or political subdivisions thereof, shall be omitted from the levy of the Special Tax to be made to cover the costs and expenses of the Services and the CFD.

L. Election. The levy of the Special Tax was subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the CFD at a special election. The voting procedure used was mailed and hand-delivered ballots to the landowners in the CFD, with each owner having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre such owner owns in the CFD.

M. Appropriations Limit The City Council established the annual appropriations limit of CFD No. l at $158,100, beginning with the 2002-2003 fiscal year. Beginning in January, 2003 and each January thereafter, the Appropriations Limit shall be adjusted by applying the Average Inerease, if any, in the Consumer Price index for the San Francisco Ati trban Wage Earners Category and the National Consumer Price Index (the "Indices"). The City Council may choose to reduce the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices prior to application. Each annual adjustment of the Appropriations Limit shall become effective on the subsequent July.

N. CFD Report. On an annual basis and consistent with the establishment of the special tax, the City Manager, as the officer having charge and control of the Services in and for the CFD, or the designce of such officer, is hereby directed to study said proposed Services and to make, or cause to be made, and file with the City Clerk a report in writing, (the "CFD Report") presenting the following:

1. The officer in charge and control to which all inquiries shall be directed:
3 42
JUL-27-05 10+19 FROM.CITY OF SUISUN CITY
I
1D-7074293756 PAGE 5/9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 --··· f
23 24
25 26
27 28
City Manager
City of Suisun City
701 Civic Center Blvd.

Suisun City, CA 94585-2600
(707) 421-7300

2. A description of the Services by type which will be required to adequately meet the needs of the CFD.

3. An estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of the Services including those Incidental Expenses described in Section III F
SECTION IV. RATE AND APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
A Special Tax applicable to each Assessor's Parcel in the CFD shall be levied and collected according to the tax liability determined by the City Council, through the application of the appropriate amount or rate for Taxable Property, as described below. All of the property in CFD, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section E below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided, including property subsequently annexed to CFD unless a separate Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax is adopted for the annexation area.

A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings :
"Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final subdivision map or other parcel map recorded at the Solano County Recorder's Office.
"Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Chapter 2.5 of Pant 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 commencing at Section 53311 of the Califomia Government Code.
"Administrator" means the individual(s) designated by the City to administer the CFD in accordance with the authority and powers granted by the City Council.

Assessors Parcel or-Parcel means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel number.
"Assessor's Parcel Map means an official map of the County Assessor of the County of Solano designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number. "Average Increase means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year. The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by (1) referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year, and (2) taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of 4 43
JUL-27-05 10.20 FROM.CITY OF SUISUN CITY
t 1D+7074293756 PAGE 6/9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 . 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
calculating the Average Increase.
"City" means the City of Suisun City.

City Council" means the City Council of the City of Suisun City, acting as the legislative body ofCFD No. 1.

Developed Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property for which a building permit for new construction has been issued prior to June 30 of the preceding Fiscal Year.

Fiscal Year" means the period starting July l and ending on the following June 30. "Indices" means the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Al! Urban Wage Earners Category and the National Consumer Price Index.

Lot Area" means the acreage of land area or portion thereof for a Non-Residential Parcel. "Maximum Special Tax" means the maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied on Taxable Property in any Fiscal Year.

Multi-Family Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued for construction of a residential structure with Units that are offered for rent to the general public.
"Non-Residential Property" means any Taxable Property within the boundaries of CFD No. 1 that is not Single Family Detached Property, Single Family Attached Propery or Multi­ Family Property, as defined herein.

Public Agency" means the federal government, State of California or other local governments or public agencies.
"Single Family Attached Property means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued for construction of a residential structure consisting of two or more Units that share common walls and are offered as for-sale units, including such residential structures that meet that statutory definition of a condominium contained in Civil Code Section 1351.
'ingle Family-Detached Property means, in -any -Fiscal Year, al Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued or will be issued for construction of a Unit that does not share a common wall with another Unit.
"Special Tax? means a special tax levied in any Fiscal Year to pay the Special Tax Requirement.
"Special Tax Requirement means the amount necessary in any Fiscal Year to () pay the cost of authorized services, (ii) pay administrative expenses of CFD No . I, and (iii) cure delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes levied in prior Fiscal Years or (based on delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes which have already taken place) are cxpccted to occur in the Fiscal Year in which the tax will be collected. 5 44
JUL-27-05 10-20 FROM·CITY OF SUISUN CITY
f
1D.7074293756 PAGE 7/9
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
B. DATA FOR ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION OF SPECIAL TAX
"Taxable Property" means all Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. I which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Unit? means a residential dwelling unit, including individual single-family detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhome, condominium , or apartment units.

After July l of each Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall categorize all Parcels of Taxable Property in CFO No. 1 as either Single Fami ly D etached Property, Single Fam ily Attached Property, Multi-Family Property or Non-Residential Property, as defined in Section A above.

For each Parcel of Single Family Attached Property and Multi-Family Property, the Administrator shall determine the number of Units on the Parcel by referencing the building permit, site plan, condominium plan, apartment plan or other development plan for the Parcel.

The Administrator shall also calculate the Lot Area for each Parcel of Non-Residential Property.
11 c. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX
1•_) Single Family Detached Property
The Maximum Special Tax for Single Family Detached Property in CFD No . 1 is $200 per Unit for Fiscal Year 2002-03. Beginning in January, 2003 and each January thereafter, this Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. The City Council may choose to reduce the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices prior to application. Each annual adjustment of the Maximum Special Tax shall become 16] effective on the subsequent July I.
l' single Family Aached Property
1a]] The Maximum Special Tax for Single Family Attached Property in CFD No. 1 is $150 per 19\ Unit for Fiscal Year 2002-03. Beginning in January, 2003 and each January thereafter, this 5[' Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. The City Council may choose to reduce the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices 1, prior to application. Each annual adjustment of the Maximum Special Tax shall become effective on the subsequent July 1.
14 15
13 .. ··-22
23 24
25 26
27 28
­
Multi-Family Property
---------· -···. ----------· . ·---- ··-·---·-·······
The Maximum Special Tax for Multi-Family Property in CFD No. I is $75 per Unit for Fiscal Year 2002-03. Beginning in January, 2003 and each January thereafter, this Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. The City Council may choose to reduce the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices prior to application. Each annual adjustment of the Maximum Special Tax shall become effective on the subsequent July l.

Non-Residential Property
6 45
JUL-27-05 10+21 FROM.CITY OF SUISUN CITY 1D.7074293758 PAGE e/9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax, no Special Tax shall be levied on land that has been conveyed to a Public Agency, except as otherwise provided in Sections 53317.3 and 533175-of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982.

The City reserves the right to make minor administrative and technical changes to this document that do not materially affect the rate and method of apportioning Special Taxes. In addition, the interpretation and application of any section of this document shall be left to thc City's discretion. Interpretations may be made by the City by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment.

The Maximum Special Tax for Non-Residential Propery in CFD No. I is $500 per 10,000 square feet of Lot Area for Fiscal Year 2002-03. Beginning in January, 2003 and each January thereafter, this Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. The City Council may choose to reduce the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices prior to application. Each annual adjustment of the Maximum Special Tax shall become effective on the subsequent July l.

Each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax shall be levied on all Parcels of Developed Property as follows:

Step I: Determine the Special Tax Requirement, as defined in Section A above, for the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax will be collected; Step 2: Calculate the total Special Tax revenues that could be collected from Developed Property within the CFD based on application of the Maximum Special Tax rates determined pursuant to Section C above;
Sep 3: If the amount determined in Step 1 is greater than or equal to the amount calculated in Step 2, levy the Maximum Special Tax on all Parcels of Developed Property in the CFD.

Step 4:If the amount determined in Step l is less than the amount calculated in Step 2, levy the Special Tax against all Parcels of Developed Property in equal percentages up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel until the amount of the Special Tax levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for that Fiscal Year.

The Special Tax for CFD No. 1 shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, provided, however, that CFD No. I may (under the authority provided in the Act), in any particular case, bill the taxes directly to the property owner off the County tax roll, and the Special Taxes will be equally subject to penalties and foreclosure if delinquent.

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION

LIMITATIONS

METHOD OF LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL TAX
SECTJONV.

E.

D.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
18 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28] SECTION VI. SAVINGS CLAUSE
7 46
JUL. -27-05 10+21 FROM+CITY OF SUISUN CITY 1D.70742293756 PAGE 9/9 l
2 3
4 5
6 7
If any provision, sentence, clause, section or part of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, such finding shall affect only such provision, sentence, clause, section or part, and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining parts of the ordinance.

SECTION VII. CHALLENGE TO TAX
Any action to challenge the tax imposed by this ordinance shall be brought pursuant to Government Code Section 50077.5 and Code of Civil Procedur e Section 860 et seq.

SECTION VIII. ELECTION REQUIRED FOR TAX TO BE EFFECTIVE 8; The tax levied by this ordinance shall be effective only if approved by two-thirds of the voters voting on the issue at the July 2, 2002 election. 9 10 SECTION IX. EFFECTIVE DATE OF TAX
11 Ifthis ordinance was approved by two-thirds of the voters voting on the issue at the July 2, 2002 election, pursuant to Elections Code Section 9217, the tax shall become effective ten 12] (10) days after thc Council certifies the results of the election. 13 SECTION X. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING
14 This ordinance shall be posted in two (2) public places within the Ciry prescribed by ordinance 15 within fifteen (15) days after its passage and published in the local newspaper of general circulation within the City.

Linda Hobson, City Clerk
26 20
27 28
16 17
18 19!/ cERTIFICATIO
I, LINDA HOBSON, City Clerk of the City of Suisun City and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing ordinance was regularly 21, introduced at a meeting of the said City Council held on Tuesday, the 2" day of July 2002 and ---·l]. regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on Tuesday, the L6" -1 day of July, 2002 by the following vote:
23] AYES: Council Members: Day, Sanchez, Segala, Sporing NOE S: Coun cil Members: None
2A] ABSENT: Council Members: Ventura
25] ABSTAIN: Council Members: None
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16 day of July 2002. 8 47

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 1 C APPENDIX C. FINAL BILLING DETAIL REPORT

The following pages show the Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

48 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-361-010 SFR $358.97 ($0.01) $358.96
0174-361-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-220 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-230 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-240 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-250 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-260 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-270 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-280 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-290 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-300 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-310 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-320 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-330 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-340 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-350 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-360 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-370 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-380 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-361-390 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 49 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-362-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-362-220 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-372-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 50 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-373-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-373-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-220 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-374-230 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 51 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-381-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-220 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-230 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-381-240 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-382-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-391-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 4 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 52 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-392-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-392-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-393-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 5 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 53 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-394-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-394-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-401-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-401-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-401-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-401-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-401-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-220 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-230 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-240 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-250 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-260 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-402-270 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 6 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 54 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-403-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-403-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-404-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-405-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-406-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 7 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 55 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-406-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-431-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-432-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 8 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 56 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-461-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-220 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-230 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-240 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-250 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-260 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-270 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-280 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-290 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-300 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-310 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-320 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-330 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-461-340 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-462-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-471-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-471-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-471-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 9 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 57 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-471-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-471-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-472-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-472-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-472-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-472-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-473-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-473-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-473-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-473-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-473-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-473-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-511-150 NONRES 5,199.24 0.00 5,199.24
0174-512-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-512-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-010 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-020 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 10 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 58 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Peterson Ranch Public Safety Services) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Property Classification Levy Other Total
0174-513-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-513-100 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-030 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-040 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-050 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-060 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-070 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-080 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-090 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-110 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-120 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-130 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-140 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-150 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-160 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-170 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-180 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-190 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-200 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-210 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-220 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-230 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-240 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-250 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-260 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-270 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
0174-514-280 SFR 358.97 (0.01) 358.96
$166,376.77 ($4.49) $166,372.28450 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 11 of 11 09/26/2025 04:40:29PM 59 Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report For:

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2
Municipal Services
October 2025

60 TABLE OF CONTENTS

District Summary ................................................................................................................... 1

1. SB 165: Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act ........................................ 2

2. CFD-Wide Levy Analysis .................................................................................................. 3

2.1 Levy Summary ........................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Special Tax Rates ....................................................................................................... 4

2.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index ................................................................ 4

3. Tax Zone 1 Levy Analysis ................................................................................................. 5

3.1 Levy Summary ........................................................................................................... 5

3.2 Special Tax Rates ....................................................................................................... 6

3.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index ................................................................ 6

4. Tax Zone 2 Levy Analysis ................................................................................................. 7

4.1 Levy Summary ........................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Special Tax Rates ....................................................................................................... 8

4.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index ................................................................ 8

5. Tax Zone 3 Levy Analysis ................................................................................................. 9

5.1 Levy Summary ........................................................................................................... 9

5.2 Special Tax Rates ..................................................................................................... 10

5.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index .............................................................. 10

6. Tax Zone 5 Levy Analysis ............................................................................................... 11

6.1 Levy Summary ......................................................................................................... 11

6.2 Special Tax Rates ..................................................................................................... 12

6.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index .............................................................. 12

7. Tax Zone 6 Levy Analysis ............................................................................................... 13

7.1 Levy Summary ......................................................................................................... 13

7.2 Special Tax Rates ..................................................................................................... 14

7.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index .............................................................. 14 Appendix A. District Boundary ............................................................................................... A Appendix B. Rate and Method of Apportionment................................................................... B Appendix C. Final Billing Detail Report ................................................................................... C 61 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 1

DISTRICT SUMMARY
On December 6, 2005, the City Council of the City of Suisun City (the “City”) established Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) (the “CFD”) under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code to finance certain police, fire, paramedic, storm drain and landscaping maintenance services as provided in the Act.

As properties develop within the City, they are required to annex into the CFD and may also be required to annex into a tax zone to pay for the costs of zone-specific services. The CFD is currently comprised of a CFD-Wide special tax and five additional special tax zones. Parcels within the boundaries of the CFD are levied the CFD-Wide special tax rate, as well as the special tax rate of the assigned tax zone based on the parcel’s property type.

Levy
The following table provides a summary of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 levy:

District
Parcel
Count
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Total Levy
CFD-Wide 359 $1,041,411.30
Tax Zone 1 (Amberwood) 28 18,639.04
Tax Zone 2 (McCoy Creek) 30 11,001.80
Tax Zone 3 (Peterson Ranch) 215 11,291.80
Tax Zone 5 (Summerwood) 69 14,647.32
Tax Zone 6 (Walmart) 1 32,270.88
Levy Total 702 $1,129,262.14

NBS
Ingrid Mijangos, Administrator
Melissa Ellico, Project Manager
Sara Mares, Client Success Ambassador
62 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 2

1. SB 165: LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND BOND

ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). This Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001, in accordance with Section 50075.1 of the California Government Code.

Some of the requirements of the Act are handled at the formation of the Special Tax District and others are handled through annual reports. This Section of this report intends to comply with Sections 50075.3 of the California Government Code that states:
“The chief fiscal officer of the issuing local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter. The annual report shall contain both of the following:

1. The amount of funds collected and expended.

2. The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Sections 50075.1.”
The requirements of the Act apply to the Funds for the following:

City of Suisun
Community Facilities District No. 2
Purpose of Special Tax
The special tax provides funding for facilities and services provided and financed by Community Facilities District No. 2 include public safety services that consist of those direct and incidental expenses required for the providing of police services within the Community Facilities District No. 2 boundary.

The project(s) are ongoing.

COLLECTIONS & EXPENDITURES
(1) Audited balance for Fiscal Year 2024/25.
(2) Unaudited amounts subject to Fiscal Year 2025/26 Audit.

Fund 6/30/2024
Balance (1)
Amount
Collected (2)
Amount
Expended (2)
6/30/2025
Balance (2)
CFD-Wide ($59.15) $941,889.86 $946,947.43 ($5,116.72) Tax Zone 1 (Amberwood) 52,457.34 19,058.21 24,598.67 46,916.88 Tax Zone 2 (McCoy Creek) 30,744.13 11,296.11 10,040.84 31,999.40 Tax Zone 3 (Peterson Ranch) 14,401.40 11,060.57 27,643.52 (2,181.55) Tax Zone 5 (Summerwood) 1,155.07 14,027.09 31,010.38 (15,828.22) Tax Zone 6 (Walmart) 24,680.78 31,717.65 39,907.19 16,491.24 63 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 3

2. CFD-WIDE LEVY ANALYSIS

2.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the total levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table below.

Description Annual Cost
Personnel and Administrative Costs $1,025,372.39
Special Tax Consultant Services 5,625.09
County Fees (1) 10,414.12
Installment Rounding (2) (0.30)
Total Amount Levied: $1,041,411.30
Levied Parcel Count 359
(1) The costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services1%Personnel and Administrative98%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 64 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 4

2.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll. (2) Certain parcels with a Live/Work property classification containing an apartment for rent have an additional multi-family special tax rate applied in accordance with the City’s historic method of calculating the special tax rate for such parcels.

2.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 2.81% over the prior fiscal year.

In accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA), the Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. “Average Increase” means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year.

The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year and taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase. “Indices” means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners (formerly San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category.

Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY 2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 331 $1,086.22 per Unit $1,086.22 per Unit $359,538.82 Single Family
Attached 0 $814.67 per Unit $0.00 per Unit 0.00
Multi-Family 5 $407.32 per Unit $407.32 per Unit 207,330.10 Live/Work (2) 11
$1,086.22 per Unit plus
$1,086.22 per 1,000
square feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential building and
ancillary improvements
$1,086.22 per Unit plus
$1,086.22 per 1,000
square feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential building and
ancillary improvements
31,364.50
Non-Residential 12
The greater of $1,086.22
per parcel or $1,086.22
per 1,000 square feet (or
portion thereof) of
Building Square Footage
The greater of
$1,086.22 per parcel or
$1,086.22 per 1,000
square feet (or portion
thereof) of Building
Square Footage
443,177.88
Totals: 359 $1,041,411.30
65 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 5

3. TAX ZONE 1 LEVY ANALYSIS

3.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the total levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table below.

Description Annual Cost
Personnel and Administrative Costs $17,125.31
Special Tax Consultant Services 1,327.89
County Fees (1) 186.40
Installment Rounding (2) (0.56)
Total Amount Levied: $18,639.04
Parcel Count 28
(1) The costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services7%Personnel and Administrative92%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 66 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 6

3.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

3.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 2.81% over the prior fiscal year.

In accordance with the RMA, the Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. “Average Increase” means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year. The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year and taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase. “Indices” means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners (formerly San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category.

Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY 2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 28 $665.70 per Unit $665.70 per Unit $18,639.04 Single Family
Attached 0 $499.27 per Unit $0.00 per Unit 0.00
Multi-Family 0 $249.64 per Unit $0.00 per Unit 0.00
Live/Work 0
$665.70 per Unit plus
$665.70 per 1,000
square feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential space
$665.70 per Unit plus
$665.70 per 1,000
square feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential space

0.00 Non-Residential 0
The greater of $665.70
per parcel or $665.70
per 1,000 square feet (or
portion thereof) of
Building Square Footage
The greater of $665.70
per parcel or $665.70
per 1,000 square feet
(or portion thereof) of
Building Square
Footage

0.00 Totals: 28 $18,639.04
67 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 7

4. TAX ZONE 2 LEVY ANALYSIS

4.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the total levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table below.

Description Annual Cost
Personnel and Administrative Costs $9,564.14
Special Tax Consultant Services 1,327.89
County Fees (1) 110.02
Installment Rounding (2) (0.25)
Total Amount Levied: $11,001.80
Parcel Count 30
(1) The costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services12%Personnel and Administrative87%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 68 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 8

4.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

4.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 2.81% over the prior fiscal year.

In accordance with the RMA, the Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. “Average Increase” means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year. The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year and taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase. “Indices” means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners (formerly San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category.

Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY 2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 19 $213.63 per EDU $213.62 per EDU $4,058.78
Single Family
Attached with
Commercial
5 $213.63 per EDU (1 unit)
plus $213.63 per 1,000
Square Feet (or portion
thereof) or non-
residential space OR
$534.08 per Unit Type
$213.63 per EDU (1
unit) plus $213.63 per
1,000 Square Feet (or
portion thereof) or
non-residential space
OR $534.08 per Unit
Type
2,670.40
Multi-Family 0 $0.00 $0.00 0.00
Live/Work 5
$213.63 per EDU plus
$213.63 per 1,000
Square Feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential space OR
$427.26 per Unit Type
$213.63 per EDU plus
$213.63 per 1,000
Square Feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential space OR
$427.26 per Unit Type
2,136.32
Non-Residential 1
$213.63 per 1,000
Square Feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential space
$213.63 per 1,000
Square Feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential space
2,136.30
Totals: 30 $11,001.80
69 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 9

5. TAX ZONE 3 LEVY ANALYSIS

5.1 Levy Summary
Description Annual Cost
Personnel and Administrative Costs $9,834.47
Special Tax Consultant Services 1,346.89
County Fees (1) 112.94
Installment Rounding (2) (2.50)
Total Amount Levied: $11,291.80
Parcel Count 215
(1) The costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services12%Personnel and Administrative87%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 70 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 10

5.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

5.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 2.81% over the prior fiscal year.

In accordance with the RMA, the Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. “Average Increase” means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year. The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year and taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase. “Indices” means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners (formerly San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category.

Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY 2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 215 $52.53 per EDU $52.52 per EDU $11,291.80
Single Family
Attached with
Commercial
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multi-Family 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Live/Work 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-Residential 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Totals: 215 $11,291.80
71 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 11

6. TAX ZONE 5 LEVY ANALYSIS

6.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the total levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table below.

Description Annual Cost
Personnel and Administrative Costs $13,169.14
Special Tax Consultant Services 1,331.89
County Fees (1) 146.48
Installment Rounding (2) (0.19)
Total Amount Levied: $14,647.32
Parcel Count 69
(1) The costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services9%Personnel and Administrative90%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 72 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 12

6.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

6.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 2.81% over the prior fiscal year.

In accordance with the RMA, the Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. “Average Increase” means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year. The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year and taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase. “Indices” means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners (formerly San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category.

Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY 2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 69 $212.28 per EDU $212.28 per EDU $14,647.32
Single Family
Attached with
Commercial
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multi-Family 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Live/Work 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-Residential 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Totals: 69 $14,647.32
73 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 13

7. TAX ZONE 6 LEVY ANALYSIS

7.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the total levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table below.

Description Annual Cost
Personnel and Administrative Costs $30,620.29
Special Tax Consultant Services 1,327.89
County Fees (1) 322.71
Installment Rounding (2) (0.01)
Total Amount Levied: $32,270.88
Parcel Count 1
(1) The costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services4%Personnel and Administrative95%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 74 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 14

7.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

7.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 2.81% over the prior fiscal year.

In accordance with the RMA, the Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. “Average Increase” means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year. The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year and taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase. “Indices” means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners (formerly San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category
Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY 2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Single Family
Attached with
Commercial
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multi-Family 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Live/Work 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-Residential 1 32,270.89 32,270.88 32,270.88
Totals: 1 $32,270.88
75 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 A APPENDIX A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY

The following pages provide the CFD Boundary Maps.

76 77
78 79
80 81
82 City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 B APPENDIX B. RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

The following pages provide the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the CFD to include the Special Tax Rates for each Tax Zone annexed into the CFD.

83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94

City of Suisun City
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report – Community Facilities District No. 2 C APPENDIX C. FINAL BILLING DETAIL REPORT

The following pages provide the Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26. 95 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0032-061-020 Non-Residential $70,604.32 $0.00 $70,604.32 0032-061-440 Non-Residential 63,000.78 0.00 63,000.78
0032-141-150 Non-Residential 44,535.03 (0.01) 44,535.02 0032-411-120 MFR 32,586.26 0.00 32,586.26
0032-411-130 MFR 32,586.26 0.00 32,586.26
0037-130-010 MFR 73,319.10 0.00 73,319.10
0037-210-040 MFR 38,288.86 0.00 38,288.86
0037-351-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-351-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-352-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 96 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0037-360-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-210 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-230 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-240 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-360-270 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-210 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-230 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-240 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-250 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-260 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-270 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-310 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-320 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-330 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-340 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-350 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-380 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-390 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-370-400 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 97 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0037-380-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-210 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-230 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-240 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-250 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-260 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-270 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-290 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-300 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-310 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-320 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0037-380-330 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-390-190 Non-Residential 24,983.07 (0.01) 24,983.06 0173-670-040 Non-Residential 8,689.76 0.00 8,689.76
0173-670-210 Non-Residential 5,431.10 0.00 5,431.10
0173-670-320 Non-Residential 5,431.10 0.00 5,431.10
0173-670-390 Non-Residential 8,689.76 0.00 8,689.76
0173-670-400 MFR 30,549.62 0.00 30,549.62
0173-811-010 L/W 2,172.44 0.00 2,172.44
0173-811-020 L/W 2,579.76 0.00 2,579.76
0173-811-030 L/W 7,603.50 0.00 7,603.50
0173-811-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-811-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-811-060 L/W 2,579.76 0.00 2,579.76
0173-811-070 L/W 2,579.76 0.00 2,579.76
0173-811-080 L/W 2,172.44 0.00 2,172.44
0173-811-090 L/W 2,172.44 0.00 2,172.44
0173-811-100 L/W 2,172.44 0.00 2,172.44
0173-811-110 L/W 2,579.76 0.00 2,579.76
0173-811-120 L/W 2,579.76 0.00 2,579.76
0173-812-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 3 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 98 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0173-812-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0173-812-180 L/W 2,172.44 0.00 2,172.44
0173-830-020 Non-Residential 202,037.00 0.00 202,037.00 0173-830-050 Non-Residential 2,172.44 0.00 2,172.44
0173-830-060 Non-Residential 4,344.88 0.00 4,344.88
0173-830-070 Non-Residential 3,258.66 0.00 3,258.66
0174-472-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-472-210 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-473-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 4 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 99 City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-481-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-210 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-220 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-230 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-240 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-250 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-481-260 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 5 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 100
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-482-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-482-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-210 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-220 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-230 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-240 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-250 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-260 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-270 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-280 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-290 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-300 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-310 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-491-320 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-492-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-492-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-492-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-492-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-492-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-492-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-492-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 6 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 101
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-492-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-501-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-502-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 7 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 102
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-503-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-503-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-511-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-512-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-010 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-020 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-513-100 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-030 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-040 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 8 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 103
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) CFD-Wide Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-514-050 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-060 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-070 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-080 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-090 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-110 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-120 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-130 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-140 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-150 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-160 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-170 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-180 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-190 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-200 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-210 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-220 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-230 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-240 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-250 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-260 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-270 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
0174-514-280 SFD 1,086.22 0.00 1,086.22
$1,041,411.32 ($0.02) $1,041,411.30359 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 9 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 104
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Amberwood - Tax Zone #1 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0037-351-010 SFR $665.69 ($0.01) $665.68
0037-351-020 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-030 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-040 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-050 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-060 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-070 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-080 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-090 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-100 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-351-110 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-010 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-020 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-030 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-040 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-050 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-060 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-070 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-080 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-090 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-100 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-110 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-120 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-130 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-140 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-150 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-160 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
0037-352-170 SFR 665.69 (0.01) 665.68
$18,639.32 ($0.28) $18,639.0428 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 10 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 105
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) McCoy Creek - Tax Zone #2 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0173-811-010 L/W $427.26 $0.00 $427.26
0173-811-020 SFA with Comm 534.08 0.00 534.08
0173-811-030
Non-Res (for levy purposes
only) 2,136.32 0.00 2,136.32
0173-811-040 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-811-050 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-811-060 SFA with Comm 534.08 0.00 534.08
0173-811-070 SFA with Comm 534.08 0.00 534.08
0173-811-080 L/W 427.26 0.00 427.26
0173-811-090 L/W 427.26 0.00 427.26
0173-811-100 L/W 427.26 0.00 427.26
0173-811-110 SFA with Comm 534.08 0.00 534.08
0173-811-120 SFA with Comm 534.08 0.00 534.08
0173-812-010 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-020 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-030 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-040 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-050 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-060 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-070 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-080 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-090 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-100 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-110 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-120 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-130 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-140 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-150 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-160 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-170 SFD 213.63 (0.01) 213.62
0173-812-180 L/W 427.26 0.00 427.26
$11,001.99 ($0.19) $11,001.8030 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 11 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 106
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Peterson Ranch - Tax Zone #3 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-472-060 SFR $52.53 ($0.01) $52.52
0174-472-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-150 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-160 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-170 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-180 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-190 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-200 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-472-210 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-473-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-150 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-160 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-170 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-180 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 12 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 107
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Peterson Ranch - Tax Zone #3 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-481-190 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-200 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-210 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-220 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-230 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-240 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-250 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-481-260 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-150 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-160 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-170 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-180 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-190 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-482-200 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 13 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 108
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Peterson Ranch - Tax Zone #3 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-491-150 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-160 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-170 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-190 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-200 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-210 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-220 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-230 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-240 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-250 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-260 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-270 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-280 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-290 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-300 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-310 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-491-320 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-492-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-150 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-160 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-170 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 14 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 109
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Peterson Ranch - Tax Zone #3 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-501-180 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-190 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-501-200 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-150 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-160 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-170 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-502-180 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-503-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 15 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 110
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Peterson Ranch - Tax Zone #3 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-511-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-511-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-512-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-010 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-020 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-513-100 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-030 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-040 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-050 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-060 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-070 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-080 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-090 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-110 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-120 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-130 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-140 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-150 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-160 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-170 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-180 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-190 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-200 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-210 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-220 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-230 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 16 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 111
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Peterson Ranch - Tax Zone #3 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0174-514-240 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-250 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-260 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-270 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
0174-514-280 SFR 52.53 (0.01) 52.52
$11,293.95 ($2.15) $11,291.80215 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 17 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 112
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Summerwood - Tax Zone #5 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0037-360-020 SFR $212.28 $0.00 $212.28
0037-360-060 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-070 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-090 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-100 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-110 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-120 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-140 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-160 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-170 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-190 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-200 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-210 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-230 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-240 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-360-270 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-010 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-020 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-040 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-050 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-060 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-070 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-110 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-120 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-130 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-140 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-150 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-170 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-180 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-190 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-200 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-210 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-230 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-240 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-250 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-260 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-270 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-310 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-320 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-330 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-340 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-350 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 18 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 113
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Summerwood - Tax Zone #5 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0037-370-380 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-390 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-370-400 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-030 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-040 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-050 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-060 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-080 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-090 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-100 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-110 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-130 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-160 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-180 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-190 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-200 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-210 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-230 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-240 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-250 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-260 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-270 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-290 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-300 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-310 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-320 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
0037-380-330 SFR 212.28 0.00 212.28
$14,647.32 $0.00 $14,647.3269 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 19 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 114
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) Walmart - Tax Zone #6 Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Category Levy Other Total
0173-830-020 Non-Res $32,270.88 $0.00 $32,270.88
$32,270.88 $0.00 $32,270.881 Accounts
$1,129,264.78 ($2.64) $1,129,262.14702 Total Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 20 of 20 09/30/2025 04:20:48PM 115

Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report For:

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3
Municipal Services
October 2025

116

TABLE OF CONTENTS

District Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Levy ...................................................................................................................................... 1

1. SB 165: Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act ........................................ 2

2. Levy Analysis .................................................................................................................. 3

2.1 Levy Summary ......................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Special Tax Rates ..................................................................................................... 4

2.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index .............................................................. 4 Appendix A. District Boundary ............................................................................................... A Appendix B. Rate and Method of Apportionment................................................................... B Appendix C. Final Billing Detail Report ................................................................................... C

117

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 1

DISTRICT SUMMARY
On June 30, 2015, the City Council of the City of Suisun City established Community Facilities District No. 3 (Municipal Services) (the “CFD”) under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code.

The CFD will finance in whole or in part, the following public services, including all related administrative costs, related reserves for replacement of vehicles and equipment, and expenses: Police services, fire services, paramedical services, services for the maintenance of parks, parkways and open space (landscaping), and services for the maintenance of storm drains.

Levy
The following table provides a summary of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 final levy amount.

District
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26
Levy
Community Facilities District No. 3 1 $83,390.40

NBS
Ingrid Mijangos, Administrator
Melissa Ellico, Project Manager
Sara Mares, Client Success Ambassador

118

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 2

1. SB 165: LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND BOND

ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act. This Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001 in accordance with Section 50075.1 of the California Government Code.

Some of the requirements of the Act are handled at the formation of the Special Tax District and others are handled through annual reports. This section of this report intends to comply with Section 50075.3 of the California Government Code that states:
“The chief fiscal officer of the issuing local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter. The annual report shall contain all of the following:
(a) The amount of funds collected and expended.
(b) The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Section 50075.1.”
The requirements of the Act apply to the Funds for the following:

City of Suisun
Community Facilities District No. 3

PURPOSE OF SPECIAL TAX
The special tax provides funding for facilities and services provided and financed by Community Facilities District No. 3 include police services, fire services, paramedical services, services for the maintenance of parks, parkways and open space (landscaping), and services for the maintenance of storm drains.

COLLECTIONS & EXPENDITURES

Fund
6/30/2024
Balance (1)
Amount
Collected (2)
Amount
Expended (2)
6/30/2025
Balance (2)
Community Facilities District No. 3 $9,843.79 $81,187.86 $70,251.43 $20,780.22 (1) Audited balance for Fiscal Year 2024/25.
(2) Unaudited amounts subject to Fiscal Year 2025/26 Audit.

119

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 3

2. LEVY ANALYSIS

2.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the total levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table below.

Description Amount
Personnel and Administrative Costs $79,107.63
Special Tax Consultant Services 3,448.87
County fees(1,2) 833.90
Total Amount Levied: $83,390.40
Parcel Count 1
(1) Costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services4%Personnel and Administrative95%County fees1%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 120

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 4

2.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

2.3 Annual Increase by Consumer Price Index
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 2.81% over the prior fiscal year.

In accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA), the Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. “Average Increase” means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year.

The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year and taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase. “Indices” means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners (formerly San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category.

Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY
2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 0 $1,082.99 per Unit $0.00 per Unit $0.00
Single Family
Attached with
Commercial
0 $812.24 per Unit $0.00 per Unit 0.00
Multi-Family 0 $541.49 per Unit $0.00 per Unit 0.00
Live/Work 0
$1,082.99 per Unit plus
$1,082.99 per 1,600
square feet (or portion
thereof) of non-
residential building and
ancillary improvements
$0.00 per Unit plus $0.00
per 1,600 square feet (or
portion thereof) of non-
residential building and
ancillary improvements

0.00 Non-Residential 1
The greater of $1,082.99
per parcel or $1,082.99
per 1,600 square feet (or
portion thereof) of
building square footage
The greater of $1,082.99
per parcel or $1,082.99
per 1,600 square feet (or
portion thereof) of
building square footage
83,390.40
Totals: 1 $83,390.40
121

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 A APPENDIX A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY

122

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 B APPENDIX B. RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

The following pages provide the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the CFD.

123
124
125
126
127
128
129

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 C APPENDIX C. FINAL BILLING DETAIL REPORT

The following page shows the Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

130
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 3
Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Levy Other Total
0174-170-090 Non-Residential $83,390.41 ($0.01) $83,390.40 $83,390.41 ($0.01) $83,390.401 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 1 10/01/2025 04:19:47PM 131

Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report For:

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 5
Public Safety, Maintenance & Dredging Services
October 2025

132

TABLE OF CONTENTS

District Summary ................................................................................................................... 1

1. SB 165: Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act ........................................ 2

2. Levy Analysis .................................................................................................................. 3

2.1 Levy Summary ......................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Special Tax Rates ..................................................................................................... 4

2.3 Annual Tax Escalation Factor .................................................................................. 4 Appendix A. District Boundary ............................................................................................... A Appendix B. Rate and Method of Apportionment................................................................... B Appendix C. Final Billing Detail Report ................................................................................... C

133

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 1

DISTRICT SUMMARY
On August 8, 2023, the City Council of the City of Suisun City established Community Facilities District No. 5 (Public Safety, Maintenance, and Dredging Services) (the “CFD”) under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code.

The CFD will finance in whole or in part, the following public services, including all related administrative costs, related reserves for replacement of vehicles and equipment, and expenses: Police services, fire services, paramedical services, services for the maintenance of parks, parkways and open space (landscaping), services for the maintenance of storm drains, dredging maintenance, streetlight maintenance and related appurtenances within or adjacent to the CFD.

Levy
The following table provides a summary of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 final levy amount.

District
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26
Levy
Community Facilities District No. 5 71 $134,973.84

NBS
Ingrid Mijangos, Administrator
Melissa Ellico, Project Manager
Sara Mares, Client Success Ambassador

134

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 2

1. SB 165: LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND BOND

ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act. This Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001 in accordance with Section 50075.1 of the California Government Code.

Some of the requirements of the Act are handled at the formation of the Special Tax District and others are handled through annual reports. This section of this report intends to comply with Section 50075.3 of the California Government Code that states:
“The chief fiscal officer of the issuing local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter. The annual report shall contain all of the following:
(a) The amount of funds collected and expended.
(b) The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Section 50075.1.”
The requirements of the Act apply to the Funds for the following:

City of Suisun
Community Facilities District No. 5

PURPOSE OF SPECIAL TAX
The special tax provides funding for facilities and services provided and financed by Community Facilities District No. 5 include police services, fire services, paramedical services, services for the maintenance of parks, parkways and open space (landscaping), services for the maintenance of storm drains, dredging maintenance, streetlight maintenance and related appurtenances within or adjacent to the CFD.

COLLECTIONS & EXPENDITURES

Fund
6/30/2024
Balance (1)
Amount
Collected
Amount
Expended
6/30/2025
Balance
Community Facilities District No. 5 $0.00 $77,117.92 $67,139.34 $9,978.58 (1) Fiscal year 2024/25 was the first levy year, as such there were no beginning balance to report. 135

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 3

2. LEVY ANALYSIS

2.1 Levy Summary
A summary of the total levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 is shown in the table below.

Description Amount
Personnel and Administrative Costs $129,561.10
Special Tax Consultant Services (1,2) 5,412.74
Total Amount Levied: $134,973.84
Parcel Count 71
(1) Costs of posting and collecting the special tax are equal to 1% of the total levy amount. (2) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

Special Tax Consultant Services4%Personnel and Administrative96%FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 BUDGET 136

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 4

2.2 Special Tax Rates
The Fiscal Year 2025/26 applied rates and special tax levy are shown in the table below. (1) Includes even cent rounding adjustments for placement on the County Tax Roll.

2.3 Annual Tax Escalation Factor
On July 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing on July 1, 2023, the Maximum Special Tax shall be increased by a minimum of two percent (2%) to a maximum of six percent (6%), determined by the CFD Administrator on an annual basis as needed to increase the Maximum Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for the succeeding and future Fiscal Years.

The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Maximum Special Tax rates were increased by 6.0% over the prior fiscal year. .

Property
Classification
Parcel
Count
FY 2025/26 Maximum
Tax Rate
FY 2025/26 Applied
Tax Rate (1)
Total FY
2025/26
Special Tax Levy
Single Family
Detached 0 $1,901.05 per Unit $1,901.04 per Unit $134,973.84 137

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 A APPENDIX A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY

138

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 B APPENDIX B. RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

The following pages provide the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the CFD.

139

Page 1 ends

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT (RMA) OF SPECIAL TAX

CITY OF SUISUN CITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 5
(PUBLIC SAFETY, MAINTENANCE & DREDGING SERVICES)
A Special Tax shall be levied and collected in the City of Suisun City Community Facilities District N o. 5 (Public Safety, Maintenance & Dredging Services) (“CFD 5”) each Fiscal Year, in an amount determined by the application of the procedures described below. All taxable property (as defined below) in CFD 5, unless exempted by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed f or the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.

I. DEFINITIONS
The terms used herein shall have the following meanings:
“Accessory Dwelling Unit” or “ADU” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Residential Proper ty for which a building permit(s) has been issued for an “Accessory Dwelling Unit” as defined in in California Government Code Section 65852.2(j)(1), as may be amended from time to time, that is accessory to a primary Unit.

The ADU may be located on the same Assessor’s Parce l as the primary Unit or on a separate Assessor’s Parcel. For purposes of clarification, where an ADU and primary Unit are on the same Assessor’s Parcel , the ADU located on such Assessor’s Parcel is consid ered a separate Unit from the primary Unit on such Assessor’s Parcel for purposes of the Special Tax and both Units will be taxed. Should an Assessor’s Parcel contain only an ADU, such Assessor’s Parcel will be taxed as an ADU Unit only. “Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Act of the State of California. “Administrative Expenses” means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD 5: the costs of computing the Annual Special Tax Requirement, and the annual Special Tax and of preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules; the costs of collecting the Special Tax, including any charges levied by the County Aud itor’s Office, Tax Collector’s Office or Treasurer’ s Office; the costs of the City or designee in comply ing with the disclosure requirements of the Califor nia Government Code (including the Act), including public inquiries regarding the Special Tax; the costs of the City or designee related to an appeal of the Specia l Tax; and the costs of commencing and pursuing to completion any action arising from any delinquent Special Tax in CFD 5. “Annual Services Costs” means the amounts required to fund services authorized to be funded by CFD 5. “Annual Special Tax Requirement” means that amount with respect to CFD 5 determined by the City Council or designee as required in any Fiscal Year to pay: (1) the Administrative Expenses, (2) the Annual Services Costs, (3) any amount required to establis h or replenish any reserve or replacement fund established in connection with CFD 5, and (4) any reasonably anticipated delinquent Special Tax based on the delinquency rate for any Special Tax levied in the previous Fiscal Year. “Assessor’s Data” means Units or other information contained in the r ecords of the County Assessor for each Assessor’s Parcel.
“Assessor’s Parcel” or “Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned 140

Page 2 ends

Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the Count y designating parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel, that number assigned to such Assessment’s Parcel by the County Assessor for purposes of identification. “Building Permit” means a permit issued by the City for new construc tion of a residential building on an Assessor’s Parcel.
“Building Square Feet” or “BSF” means all of the square footage of living area wit hin the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, w alkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, or similar area. The determination of Building Square Feet shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) issued for such residential Unit. In the event that the building permit does not show Buildi ng Square Feet, other records of the City or Assessor’ s Data shall be used as determined by the CFD Administrator.
“CFD 5 ” means the City of Suisun City Community Facilitie s District No. 5 (Public Safety, Maintenance & Dredging Services), County of Solano, State of California. “CFD Administrator” means an official of the City, or designee or agen t or consultant, responsible for administering the Special Tax in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment. “City” means the City of Suisun City, County of Solano, California. “City Council” means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD 5. “County” means the County of Solano, California.
“Developed Property” means, in any Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property in CFD 5 for which a building permit for new construction was issued by the City prior to June 1 of the preceding Fiscal Year. “Exempt Property” means any property located within the boundaries of CFD 5 which is exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section V below.
“Fiscal Year ” means the period from July 1
st of any calendar year through June 30 th of the following calendar year.
“Maximum Special Tax” means the maximum Special Tax authorized to fund the Annual Services Costs in any Fiscal Year that may apply to Taxable Property as described in Section III. “Mixed-Use Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit was issued for a structure that contains more than one Property Type. For an Assessor’s Parcel of Mixed- Use Property, each Property Type is subject to taxation pursuant to section C below. “Multi-Family Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Residential Proper ty for which a building permit(s) has been issued for a residential structu re consisting of two or more Units that share commo n walls that do not have separate Assessor’s Parcel N umbers assigned to each Unit, and are available for rental by the general public, not for sale to an end user, and under common management. 141

Page 3 ends

“Non-Residential Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property with for-profit commercial or industrial uses.
“Property Owner’s Association” means any property owner’s association. As used in this definition, a Property Owner’s Association includes any home-owner’s association, condominium owner’s association, master or sub-association.
“Property Owner’s Association Property” means any property within the boundaries of CFD 5 which is (a) owned by a Property Owner’s Association or (b) designated with specific boundaries and acreage on a final subdivision map as property owner association property. “Property Type” means any of the classes listed in Table 1. “Proportionately” means, for Developed Property that the ratio of th e Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax are equal for all Assessors’ Parcels of Developed Property within CFD 5. “Public Property” means any property within the boundaries of CFD 5 owned by, irrevocably offered or dedicated to, or for which an easement for purposes of public or private road right-of-way making the property unusable for any other purpose has been gr anted to the federal government, the State of California, the County, the City, or any local government or other public agency. “Rate and Method of Apportionment” means this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Spe cial Taxes for CFD 5.
“Residential Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential Units. “Single Family Residential Attached Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Residential Propert y for which a building permit(s) has been issued for a residential structure consisting of two or more Units that share common walls that have separate Assessor’s Pa rcel Numbers assigned to each Unit, may be purchased by individual homebuyers, including such residential structures that meet the statutory definition of a condominium project contained in Civil Code Section 4125, according to Assessor’s Data or as otherwise known by the CFD Administrator.
“Single Family Residential Detached Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Residential Propert y for which a building permit(s) has been issued for a residential structure consisting of one Unit that does not share a common wall with another Unit, and may be p urchased by individual homebuyers, according to Assessor’s Data or as otherwise known by the CFD Administrator. “Special Tax(es)” means the amount levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property to fund the Annual Special Tax Requirement.
“Tax Escalation Factor” means on July 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing on July 1, 2023, the Maximum Special Tax as shown in Section III shall be increased by a minimum of two percent (2%) to a maximum of six percent (6%), determined by the CFD Administrat or on an annual basis as needed to increase the Maximum Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement for the succeeding and future Fiscal Years. “Tax Zone” means a mutually exclusive geographic area within which the Special Tax may be levied pursuant to this Rate and Method of Apportionment. All the Taxable Property within CFD 5 at the time 142

Page 4 ends

of its formation is within Tax Zone No. 1. Additional Tax Zones may be created when property is annexed to CFD 5, and a separate Maximum Special Tax shall be identified for property within each new Tax Zone at the time of such annexation. The Assessor’s Parcels included within a new Tax Zone when such Parcels are annexed to CFD 5 shall be identified by Assessor’s Parcel number in the annexation documents at the time of annexation.
“Taxable Property” means all Parcels within the boundary of CFD 5 tha t are not Exempt Property, or exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to the Act.
“Undeveloped Property” means all Parcels within CFD 5 that are not Develop ed Property, Property Owner’s Association Property, or Public Property.
“Unit” means (i) for Single Family Residential Detached Pr operty, an individual single family detached residential unit, and (ii) an ADU. The number of Un its assigned to each Assessor’s Parcel may be determined by (i) referencing Assessor’s Data, (ii) site surveys and physical unit counts, and/or (iii ) other research by the CFD Administrator.
“Welfare Exempt Property” means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels within the b oundaries of CFD 5 that (a) have been granted a welfare exemption by the County under subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the Revenue and Taxation Code indicated in the Assessor’s Data finalized as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Ye ar, and (b) are exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section 53340(c) of the Act.

II. DETERMINATION OF TAXABLE PARCELS
Each Fiscal Year, the CFD Administrator shall deter mine the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers for all Taxable Property within CFD 5 for the then-current Fiscal Y ear. To the extent a Parcel of Taxable Property is subdivided, consolidated, or otherwise reconfigured , the Maximum Special Tax shall be assigned to the new Assessor’s Parcel Number(s) pursuant to Section III. The CFD Administrator shall also determine: ( i) the Tax Zone within which each Parcel is located; ( 2) which Parcels are Developed Property and Undeveloped Property; (ii) the number of Units each Parcel contains; (iii) the property type, i.e., Si ngle Family Residential Detached Property or Accessory D welling Unit; and (iv) the Annual Special Tax Requirement for the Fiscal Year.

143

Page 5 ends

III. MAXIMUM ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATES
The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property within Tax Zone No. 1 shall be assigned according to the table below.

TABLE 1

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
TAX ZONE NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2022/23*
Property Type
Maximum Special
Tax Rate Per
Single Family Residential Detached Property $1,596. 16 Unit Single Family Residential Attached Property 0.00 Unit
Multi-Family Property 0.00 Unit
Non-Residential Property 0.00 BSF
Accessory Dwelling Unit See below Unit
Mixed-Use Property See below Unit/BSF
*On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2023, the Maxi mum Special Tax Rate shall be increased by the Tax Escalation Factor.

Accessory Dwelling Unit
The Maximum Special Tax for an Accessory Dwelling U nit shall be calculated as a percentage of the Maximum Special Tax for the primary Unit the ADU is accessory to, based on Building Square Footage. For example, if a primary Unit of Single Family Residential Detached Property with 2,000 BSF has an ADU of 800 BSF, the Maximum for the ADU Special Tax in Tax Zone No. 1 shall be calculated by the following steps:

1. 800 BSF / 2,000 BSF = 0.40 or 40%

2. $1,596.16 Maximum Special Tax per Unit x 40% = $638.46 Maximum Special Tax for such ADU
Mixed-Use Property
In some instances, an Assessor’s Parcel of Develope d Property may contain more than one Property Type. The Maximum Special Tax assigned to an Assessor’s Parcel of Mixed-Use Property shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax for all property uses located on that Assessor’s Parcel.

IV. SPECIAL TAX - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
All Taxable Property shall be subject to a Special Tax defined as follows. The Special Tax shall be le vied each Fiscal Year by the CFD Administrator.

The Annual Special Tax Requirement shall be apporti oned to each Parcel within CFD 5 by the method shown below.
144

Page 6 ends

First. Determine the Annual Special Tax Requirement.

Second. Levy the Special Tax on each Parcel of Developed Pr operty, Proportionately, up to the applicable Maximum Special Tax to satisfy the Annual Special Tax Requirement.

Under no circumstances will the Special Tax on any Assessor’s Parcel of used for private residential purposes be increased by more than 10% as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor’s Parcel within CFD 5.

V. FORMULA FOR PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX OBLIGATION S
The Special Tax may not be prepaid.

VI. EXEMPTIONS
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Rate an d Method of Apportionment, no Special Tax shall be levied on Property Owner’s Association Property, Un developed Property, Assessor’s Parcels with public or utility easements making impractical their utili zation for any use other than the purposes set fort h in the easement, or Public Property, except as otherwise provided in Sections 53317.3, 53317.5, and 53340.1 of the Act.

No Special Tax shall be levied on any Assessor’s Parcel in any Fiscal Year in which such Assessor’s Parcel is classified as Welfare Exempt Property.

VII. INTERPRETATION OF RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The City reserves the right to make minor administrative and technical changes to this document that do not materially affect the rate and method of apportioning the Special Tax. In addition, the interpretation and application of any section of this document sha ll be at the City’s discretion. Interpretations may be made by the City Council by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment.

VIII. MANNER AND DURATION OF SPECIAL TAX
The Special Tax shall be collected in the same mann er and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, provided that the City may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect the Special Tax at a different time or in a different manner if needed t o meet the financial obligations of CFD 5, and may collect delinquent Special Taxes through other available methods.

A Special Tax shall continue to be levied and colle cted commencing in Fiscal Year 2022/23 to the exten t necessary to satisfy the Annual Special Tax Require ment and shall be levied perpetually or for as long as required to satisfy the Annual Special Tax Requirement, as determined by the City.

IX. APPEAL OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY
Any property owner may file a written appeal of the Special Tax with the CFD Administrator claiming that the amount or application of the Special Tax is not correct. The appeal must be filed not later than o ne calendar year after having paid the Special Tax tha t is disputed, and the appellant must be current in all payments of the Special Tax. In addition, during the term of the appeal process, all Special Tax levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made. 145

Page 7 ends

The appeal must specify the reasons why the appella nt claims the Special Tax is in error. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination.

If the property owner disagrees with the CFD Admini strator’s decision relative to the appeal, the owne r may then file a written appeal with the City Council whose subsequent decision shall be final and binding on all interested parties. If the decision of the C FD Administrator or subsequent decision by the City Council requires the Special Tax to be modified or changed in favor of the property owner, the CFD administrator shall determine if sufficient Special Tax revenue is available to make a cash refund. If a cash refund cannot be made, then an adjustment shall be made to credit the Special Tax in future years.

This procedure shall be exclusive and its exhaustion by any property owner shall be a condition precedent to filing any legal action by such owner.
146

City of Suisun
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Report - Community Facilities District No. 3 C APPENDIX C. FINAL BILLING DETAIL REPORT

The following page shows the Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

147
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 5 (Public Safety, Maintenance & Dredging) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Tax Zone Total
0032-481-010 SFR Tax Zone #1 $1,901.04
0032-481-020 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-030 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-040 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-050 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-060 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-070 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-080 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-090 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-100 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-110 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-120 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-130 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-140 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-150 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-160 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-170 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-180 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-190 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-200 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-210 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-220 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-230 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-240 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-250 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-260 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-270 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-280 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-290 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-300 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-310 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-320 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-330 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-340 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-350 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-360 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-370 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-380 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-390 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-400 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-410 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-420 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 1 of 2 10/01/2025 04:52:57PM 148
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 5 (Public Safety, Maintenance & Dredging) Final Billing Detail Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Account ID Land Use Tax Zone Total
0032-481-430 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-481-440 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-010 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-020 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-030 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-040 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-050 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-060 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-070 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-080 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-090 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-100 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-110 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-120 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-130 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-140 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-150 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-160 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-170 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-180 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-190 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-200 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-210 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-220 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-230 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-240 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-250 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-260 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
0032-482-270 SFR Tax Zone #1 1,901.04
$134,973.8471 Accounts
Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Copyright © 2013 by NBS Page 2 of 2 10/01/2025 04:52:57PM 149

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
150
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

December 16, 2025

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-__: Adopting the Updated 2025 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) and Designating the Legally Responsible Official (LRO) as Required by the State Board Water Discharge Requirements.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of the updated Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) would not have any financial impact to the General Fund. However, the implementation of requirements within the SSMP may result in financial impacts primarily to the Sewer Maintenance Fund (185) and to the Sewer Repair Capital Improvement Program Fund (188). Funds should be available in both funds.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Ensure Public Safety, Provide Good Governance, and Enhance Environment.

BACKGROUND:

The Statewide Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) adopted on December 6, 2022, by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requires that all owners and operators of sanitary sewer collection systems over one mile in length develop and implement a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) (previously known as a Sanitary Sewer Management Plan) pursuant to State Water Resources Control Board Order WQ 2022-0103-DWQ. As an owner and operator of a collection system, the City must implement a comprehensive plan for inspection, condition assessment, cleaning, rehabilitation, capacity assessment, and capital upgrades to mitigate Sanitary Sewer Spills (Spills).

Sanitary Sewer Spills were formally titled Sanitary Sewer Spills (Spills).

The state requires the SSMP to be updated every six years. The last updated of the SSMP was completed in 2019. Although the SWRCB requires that the SSMP be updated every six years, the SSMP is considered a dynamic document and may require updating on a more frequent basis. Routine changes to primarily administrative information, notwithstanding, minor changes will likely be required to address improvements identified through the SSMP Audit or through modifications required as conditions change. Updates of this nature will not be brought before Council for approval as any changes will be minor in nature and not significantly impact the overall document. An update example might be changing a contact phone number or a contact name.

STAFF REPORT:

All federal and state agencies, municipalities, counties, districts, and other public entities that own or operate sanitary sewer systems greater than one mile in length that collect and/or convey untreated or partially treated wastewater to a publicly owned treatment facility in the State of California are required to comply with the terms of State Water Resources Control Board Order WQ 2022-0103-DWQ.

Sanitary Sewer Spills (Spills)(previously referred to as Sanitary Sewer Overflows or SSOs) are defined as discharges of untreated or partially treated wastewater from a sanitary sewer system at any point before reaching a treatment facility. Discharges may be of domestic, industrial, and/or commercial wastewater. Spills may contain high levels of suspended solids, toxic pollutants, pathogenic organisms (such as bacteria and viruses that cause diseases), oil and grease, and other pollutants. Spills may cause a public nuisance, particularly when raw untreated wastewater is discharged to areas with high public exposure, such as streets or surface waters used for fishing or body contact recreation. Spills may 151
pollute surface or ground waters, threaten public health, adversely affect aquatic life, and impair the recreational use and aesthetic enjoyment of surface waters.

Sanitary sewer systems experience periodic failures that increase the likelihood of a Spill. Factors may include geological shifts, design deficiencies, construction methods and materials, age, and deterioration of the system. Major causes of Spills also include: grease blockages, root blockages, flood damage, structural failures, vandalism, pump station mechanical failures, power outages, excessive storm or ground water inflow/infiltration, debris blockages, lack of proper operation and maintenance, insufficient capacity, and contractor-caused damages.

The state requires the preparation of the Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) because it is a proactive approach to ensure a system-wide operation, maintenance, and management plan is in place to reduce the frequency and size of Spills. All SSMPs contain the following goals:

Proper management and operation
. Effectively manage, operate, and maintain all parts of the wastewater collection system, including sewer lines, manholes, and pump stations.

Capacity management.

Ensure the sewer system has adequate capacity to convey peak wastewater flows, including those that occur during rainstorms.

Prevent Spills.

Minimize the frequency and impact of sanitary sewer overflows by implementing preventative maintenance and operational programs. Identify, prioritize and continuously renew and replace sewer collection system assets to maintain functionality.

Mitigate Spill impacts.

Respond to and mitigate the impacts of Spills. This includes containing spills and cleaning up affected areas.

Collection System Staff Training.

Provide regular training for City staff and contractors in collection system maintenance, operations, and emergency response.

Compliance with regulations.

Meet all applicable regulatory requirements for notification and reporting to the State and Regional Water Boards
The City’s wastewater collection system serves approximately 29,500 residents, plus numerous visitors and businesses. The system consists of 68 miles of gravity sewers. The City is responsible for sewer lines 10” or smaller. Most of the City’s sewer lines were constructed between 1980 and 2019. All sewage is conveyed to and treated at the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (FSSD).

Suisun City’s Public Works Maintenance Division (Streets Crew primarily) is responsible for the safe and efficient maintenance of the City’s sanitary sewer collection system. Its mission is to ensure the continuous flow of wastewater to the FSSD and to prevent sanitary sewer overflows.

Public Works Maintenance sewer maintenance program includes: hot spot cleaning and system-wide cleaning. The program includes line cleaning, supporting closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspections done each year by the Fairfield Suisun Sewer District (FSSD), structural repairs, preventative maintenance, spill response, and preparing operational reports as applicable. Closed circuit television (CCTV) inspections of all sized lines within City boundaries are administered by FSSD with Public Works Maintenance providing support in cleaning the lines ahead of the CCTV program. FSSD has divided the City into five (5) sections and CCTVs each section every five years. City staff regularly works to develop additional standard operating procedures (SOPs) to ensure cleaning methods are effective and work assignments are efficient.

A review of data from October 2015 through October 2025 shows that the City consistently performed better than the statewide and regional spill rate indices, reflecting Public Works Maintenance’s strong commitment to the safety and wellbeing of our residents. See Attachment No. 3.

152
Per the Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems (WDRs), the
City is required to designated a Legally Responsible Official (LRO) and staff is recommending that Public Works Director/City Engineer (Nouae Vue) be designated as the City’s Legally Responsible Official (LRO).

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council Adopt Resolution No. 2025- __: Adopting the Updated 2025 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) and Designating the Legally Responsible Official (LRO) as Required by the State Board Water Discharge Requirements.

PREPARED BY:

Amanda Dum, Management Analyst II
REVIEWED BY:

Nouae Vue, Public Works Director/City Engineer
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 2025-__: Â Adopting the Updated 2025 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) and Designating the Legally Responsible Official as Required by the State Board Water Discharge Requirements.

2. Updated 2025 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP).
153
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY ADOPTING THE UPDATED 2025 SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP)

AND DESIGNATING THE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL (LRO) AS

REQUIRED BY THE STATE BOARD WATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS

WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) adopted Order Number 2006-0003-DWQ, Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems (WDRs); and

WHEREAS, the State Board reissued WQ 2022-0103-DWQ Statewide Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems and was adopted by the State Board on December 6, 2022; and

WHEREAS, these WDRs apply to the City's Sewer Collection System; and,

WHEREAS, the objective of the WDRs is to reduce the frequency and volume of Sanitary Sewer Spills (Spills) by requiring cities to fund, operate, maintain, and manage their sewer collection system.; and

WHEREAS, the WDRs contain provisions that require sewer collection system agencies to develop programs and plans to operate, maintain, and manage the sewer collection system is adequately documented in what the WDRs refer to as a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP), a living document, which receives an official update every six (6) years with minor , primarily but not limited to, administrative changes and edits occurring as needed in the years between Updates to ensure the document includes timely and accurate information; and

WHEREAS, the WDRs require that the City certify to the State Board every six years that the SSMP is in compliance with the WDRs; and

WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has updated the City of Suisun City’s SSMP in accordance with the reissued WDRs; and

WHEREAS, the WDRs requires reporting and certification of Sanitary Sewer Spill (Spill) events through the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS); and

WHEREAS, the WDRs requires the City designate a Legally Responsible Official (LRO) that has authority to ensure the enrolled sanitary sewer system(s) complies with this Order, and is authorized to serve as a duly authorized representative; and

WHEREAS, the Legally Responsible Official must have responsibility over management of the Enrollee's entire sanitary sewer system, and must be authorized to make managerial decisions that govern the operation of the sanitary sewer system, including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital improvement recommendations to ensure long-term environmental compliance; and

154
WHEREAS, the City Council appoints the Public Works Director/City Engineer, Nouae Vue, as the authorized representative and primary Legally Responsible Official for the City; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Suisun City resolves that the 2025 Sewer System Management Plan is adopted and shall be submitted and certified with the State Board by Public Works staff, and that the Public Works/City Engineer is appointed as the Legally Responsible Official.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, the 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of December 2025.

Anita Skinner
City Clerk

155
156

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

157

SUMMARY OF SSMP ACTION ITEMS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page i Summary of SSMP Action Items
Table 1 provides a chronological summary of the items found in each Section’s “Implementation Plans and Schedules” table. Items are sorted by date, to assist the City in determining when action s are needed. Additional information regarding each action item is found in the discussion within each section of the SSMP.

Schedule Action Item Section

As Needed
• Notify District of need to update maps.
• After each spill event, review Chain of Communication outcomes. • For each contract: Review agreements with contractors and/or pre-job meeting minutes to ensure contract personnel have received instruction for responding to sewage spills.
• Ensure all project plans ar e approved in accordance with the City’s Standard Details and Specifications.
• Enforce design standards to ensure new sewers are sized with adequate capacity.
• For each CIP update: utilize all available data for prioritizing corrective actions considering severity and consequences of potential spills. • For each delayed CIP project: justify and document the reason. • Monitor and evaluate spill trends; document efforts.

1.3.2 2.2

4.3.2 5.1.1

8.2.3 8.3.1

8.4.2 9.3
Continuously
• Monitor and document occasions when Municipal Code Ordinance(s) failed to address issues as intended.
• Continue to participate in the Solano Bayshore Resiliency Project. • Each significant rain event: Monitor/evaluate significant rain events to see if they exceed the design storm in the hydraulic model. •
Maintain documents and recordkeeping of system evaluation and condition assessment inspections and activities.

3.2 8.1.4

8.2.2 8.3.2
Semi-annually: By
June 30 and
December 31 each
year
• Review names, contact information and position responsibilities in Section 2; update as needed.
• Review Organizational Chart for any changes; update as needed. • Review work completed to date to ensure critical work is being completed.
• Review training documentation to ensure all staff have received required training.
• Ask Solano County and the District to provide a status report detailing the FSEs inspected, inspection results, and any enforcement taken. Take action if necessary.
• Monitor flows in each basin and update the hydraulic model.

2.1 2.3

4.21. 4.3.1

7.1 8.3.4
158

SUMMARY OF SSMP ACTION ITEMS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page ii Schedule Action Item Section
Annually: By
December 31 each
year
• Confer with storm drain owners to ensure current practices and contact information are up to date.
• Review map update procedures with all affected staff.
• Review/ensure all newly installed facilities have been updated and included in the system maps.
• Review scheduled Preventative Maintenance to ensure the prescribed schedule remains appropriate.
• Conduct SERP training including practice drills.
• Audit inventory lists to ensure stock is adequate
• Review Post Spill Assessments to ensure adherence with the SERP and to identify any trends that should be addressed.
• Review/evaluate enforcement and inspection findings and implement changes as necessary.
• Review spill rates and causes and make changes to maintenance programs, as necessary.
• Hold regular coordination meetings, with all parties, to help keep CIP projects on track and resolve issues that may arise in a timely manner. • Assess work programs to ensure outcomes are as intended. • Monitor and evaluate spill trends, document efforts.
• Ensure the SSMP is posted on the City website and the link functions properly.
• Ensure Sewage Spill Warning signs are readily available to communicate with the public when necessary.

3.3 4.1.1

4.1.2 4.2.2

4.3.4 4.4.1

6.1 6.2

7.1 8.1.1

8.1.2 8.4.1

9.1 9.3

11.2 11.3
By December 31, 2025
• Prepare an up-to-date SERP that meets the requirements of Attachment D-6 of the WDR.
• Fully transition to Cartegraph for scheduling and data collection. • Maintain inspection, maintenance, and spill information in CMMS (i.e., Cartegraph).
• Prepare and/or revise City’s hydraulic model; include design storm parameters.

6.3 4.3.3

5.19.1 8.2.1

8.1.4 5.19.1
By June 30, 2026
• Update City Municipal Code to address the items listed in the “Potential Municipal Code Update” table.
• Conduct comprehensive training regarding all aspects of the up -to-date SERP including flow measurement and practice drills.
• Develop standard operating procedures for the addition and removal of lines from the hot spot program.
• In conjunction with the District, define and implement a formal manhole inspection program based upon the NASSCO Manhole Assessment Certification Program (MACP) rating system.
• Prepare educational information about FOG and post on City website. • Prioritize condition assessments based on environmental consequences.

3.5 4.3.3

5.19.2 5.19.3

6.4 7.3

8.1.3 159

SUMMARY OF SSMP ACTION ITEMS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page iii

Schedule Action Item Section
By December 31, 2026
• Contact Caltrans and Solano County to discuss an aid agreement to allow the City to respond to any wastewater spills which enter a Caltrans or County storm drain.
• Update City’s Design, Construction, and Inspection Standards to address the items listed in the “Potential Updates” table.
•
Prepare a Wastewater Master Plan that considers all factors listed in Attachment D, Section 8.2 of the WDR.

3.4 5.1.2

5.2.3 8.2.5
March 1, 2026 • For the FY25-26 CIP , publish bid documents. 8.4.3 Begin May 2, 2027
• Prepare for next SSMP Audit
• Review City-owned asset statistics and Element description; update as necessary.

1.2.1 1.3.1
By November 2, 2027
• Complete and upload next SSMP Audit
• Incorporate Audit findings, update Change Log and Update SSMP . Ensure a plan and schedule is developed to address deficiencies.

1.2.2 1.2.3

10.2 Begin May 2, 2030
• Prepare for next SSMP Audit
• Review City-owned asset statistics and Element description; update as necessary.

1.2.4 1.3.1
By November 2, 2030
• Complete and upload next SSMP Audit
• Incorporate Audit findings, update Change Log and Update SSMP . Ensure a plan and schedule is developed to address deficiencies.

1.2.5 1.2.6

10.2 Begin May 2, 2031
• Prepare for next SSMP Update
• Review Ordinance(s) to confirm all documents provide necessary required legal authority.

1.2.7 3.1
By August 2, 2031 • City Council approval deadline for next SSMP Update; upload to CIWQS. 1.2.8

11.1 Table 1 – Summary of SSMP Action Items
160

SSMP CHANGE LOG OF REVISIONS AND COMPLETED ACTION ITEMS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page iv SSMP Change Log of Revisions and Completed Action Items1 Revision
Date
SSMP
Section
Approval
Date Description of Change/Revision/Activity Initials

To add a row,
select this
text and hit
TAB2

1 Use this Change Log to document any edits/changes or action items as they are identified and document when they are completed. 2 To add additional table rows, insert your curser into the bottom right cell of the table and hit the tab button. The table wi ll continue on the next page.
161

LETTER OF COMPLIANCE

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for City of Suisun City use only. Page v

City of Suisun City
Attn: Nouae Vue
Public Works Director/City Engineer
701 Civic Center Rd.

Suisun City, CA 94585
Dear Mr. Vue,
We are pleased to present the new 2025 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) Update developed in partnership with the City of Suisun City ’s management. The 2025 Update meets and exceeds compliance with the WDR (State Water Board, Water Quality Order No. 2022 -0103-DWQ, Attachment D-10 and Specifications 5.4). The 2025 SSMP has been completely revised to harmonize with industry standard guidelines and incorporates the City’s latest SSMP Audit findings.

The 2025 SSMP is a declaration of what the City is doing to demonstrate full compliance with the WDR. Attachment A of the WDR (page A-4), states “A sewer system management plan is a living document an Enrollee develops and implements to effectively manage its sanitary sewer system(s) in accordance with this General Order”. We suggest that the City review the SSMP on a regular basis, and as required by the WDR, continuously document changes to its SSMP in a change log attached to the Plan.

We look forward to assisting the City wherever necessary to fully implement the new 2025 SSMP Update.

Sincerely,

James Fischer, P.E.

Principal, Fischer Compliance LLC
Credentialed U.S. EPA NPDES Compliance Inspector
162

OVERVIEW
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SSMP ACTION ITEMS CHECKLIST (IMPLEMENTATION PLANS AND SCHEDULES) .......................................................... I SSMP CHANGE LOG OF REVISIONS AND COMPLETED ACTION ITEMS ........................................................................ IV INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 SSMP Organization ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Abbreviations and Acronyms.................................................................................................................................................... 10

1. GOAL AND INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 11

1.1. Regulatory Context ............................................................................................................................................................ 11

1.2. SSMP Update Schedule ..................................................................................................................................................... 12

1.3. Sewer System Asset Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 14 Specifications 5.2 – SSMP Development and Implementation ................................................................................................ 18 Specifications 5.7 – Allocation of Resources ............................................................................................................................ 19 Provisions 6.1 – Enforcement Provisions ................................................................................................................................. 20 Provisions 6.3 – Sewer System Management Plan Availability ................................................................................................ 21

2. ORGANIZATION ....................................................................................................................................................... 22

2.1. Organizational Chart .......................................................................................................................................................... 25

2.2. Organizational Staffing Responsibilities ............................................................................................................................ 26

2.3. Chain of Communication for Reporting Spills .................................................................................................................... 28

3. LEGAL AUTHORITY .................................................................................................................................................. 30

4. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM ......................................................................................................... 35

4.1. Updated Map of Sewer System ......................................................................................................................................... 35

4.2. Preventive Operation and Maintenance Activities ............................................................................................................ 37

4.3. Training .............................................................................................................................................................................. 38

4.4. Equipment Inventory ......................................................................................................................................................... 40 Specifications 5.19 – Operations and Maintenance ................................................................................................................. 41

5. DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................. 43

5.1. Updated Design Criteria/Construction Standards/Specifications ..................................................................................... 43

5.2. Procedures and Standards ................................................................................................................................................. 45

6. SPILL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ....................................................................................................................... 48

7. SEWER PIPE BLOCKAGE PROGRAM ........................................................................................................................ 50

8. SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................ 54

8.1. System Evaluation and Condition Assessment .................................................................................................................. 54

8.2. Capacity Assessment and Design Criteria .......................................................................................................................... 57

8.3. Prioritization of Corrective Action ..................................................................................................................................... 59

8.4. Capital Improvement Plan ................................................................................................................................................. 60

9. MONITORING, MEASUREMENT, AND PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS ....................................................................... 63

10. INTERNAL AUDITS ................................................................................................................................................. 65

11. COMMUNICATION PROGRAM .............................................................................................................................. 67 LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................................... 69

163

OVERVIEW
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page vii

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Collection Spill Summary: Operational Indices for City with State and Regional Data................................ 8 Figure 2 – Sewer System Management Plan, Subsequent Update and Audit Due Dates .......................................... 12 Figure 3 – City Vicinity Map and Service Area ............................................................................................................ 15 Figure 4 – Sewer Collection System (from 2023 Master Plan) ................................................................................... 16 Figure 5 – City Utilities Department Organization Chart ............................................................................................ 25

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Summary of SSMP Compliance Implementation Plans and Schedules ........................................................ iii Table 2 – Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 10 Table 3 – City Sewer Connection Flow Classifications and Connections Data ............................................................ 16 Table 4 – Sewer Enterprise Fund Revenue .................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 5 – Sewer Enterprise Fund Expenditures ............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 6 – Implementation Responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 24 Table 7 – Responsible Position Contact Information .................................................................................................. 23 Table 8 – Major Equipment Inventory ........................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 9 – Critical Replacement Parts Inventory ............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 10 – System Wide Cleaning Results ..................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 11 – Problem Line Cleaning List ........................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 12 – Problem Line Cleaning Results ..................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table 13 – Standard Measures of Observed Results for Collection System Line CleaningError! Bookmark not defined.

Table 14 – Gravity Sewer System Siphons ..................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

164

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 8 Introduction
This Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) or “Plan” has been prepared for the City of Suisun (City) with technical assistance from Fischer Compliance LLC with the goal of meeting and exceeding compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board 2022 General Waste Discharge Requirements, Order No. WQ 2022-0103-DWQ for Sanitary Sewer Systems (referred to throughout this document as the WDR ). The City provided all details, information and institutional insights for preparation of the SSMP. The document has been developed to meet the size, scale, and complexity of the City, serving as a “living document” used as a tool for managing and operating the City's sanitary sewer collection system. Additionally, the latest 2024 Sewer System Management Plan Guidance Manual published by the Bay Area Clean Water Agencies (BACWA) was utilized as a model for development of the document to harmonize formatting/content and incorporate recommended suggested guidance wherever possible.

The City’s commitment to meeting regulatory requirements, along with its proactive approach to operation and management of the collection system, has served it well, as evidenced by the system’s performance relative to other agencies in the region and the state.

Figure 1 provides key spill metrics, including data comparing the City’s spill record with state and regional system data for the ten -year period of October 2015 through October 2025. The City consistently performs better than both statewide and regional spill rate indices and net spill volumes for all categories of spills.

Figure 1 – Collection Spill Summary: Operational Indices for City with State and Regional Data 165

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 9 SSMP Organization
This SSMP is organized into eleven ( 11) core Elements following Attachment D of the WDR, with inclusion of applicable Specifications requirements.

Each individual Element in the SSMP includes the following technical contents.

1. Requirements – Provides the actual description of applicable requirements in the WDR.

2. Compliance – Describes the City’s approach to complying with the WDR requirements.

3. Effectiveness – As measured by Key Performance Indicators (KPIs.)

4. Implementation – Demonstrates how the City will ensure the SSMP will be carried out as described.

5. Resilience – Demonstrates the resilience that is addressed in the SSMP and built -in to the City’s collection system and procedures.

6. Appendix Inclusions – Lists the items included in the Appendix for each SSMP Element, if any.

166

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 10 Abbreviations and Acronyms
BMP Best Management Practices
CCTV Closed Circuit Television
CIP Capital Improvement Program
CIPP Cured in Place Pipe
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System (State Water Board Online Spill Database) CMMS Computerized Maintenance Management System
District Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District
EPA US Environmental Protection Agency
FSSD Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District
FOG Fats, Oils and Grease
FSE Food Service Establishment
GCD Grease Control Device
GIS Geographic Information System
I & I Inflow and Infiltration
Legal City Legal Staff
LRO Legally Responsible Official
MA City’s Public Works Department Management Analyst
PWD City’s Public Works Director/City Engineer
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SERP Spill Emergency Response Plan
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SSMP Sewer System Management Plan
Spill Sanitary Sewer Spill
Sup City’s Public Works Superintendent
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
WDID Waste Discharge ID Number (CIWQS)
WDR Sanitary Sewer Systems General Wastewater Discharge Requirements Order issued by the State Water Board (Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ)
Table 2 – Abbreviations and Acronyms
167

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 11

1. Goal and Introduction

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-1 (pg. D-2)
“The goal of the Sewer System Management Plan (Plan) is to provide a plan and schedule to: (1) properly manage, operate, and maintain all parts of the Enrollee’s sanitary sewer system(s), (2) reduce and prevent spills, and (3) contain and mitigate spills that do occur.

The Plan must include a narrative Introduction section that discusses the following items:”

1.1. Regulatory Context

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-1.1 (pg. D-2)
“The Plan Introduction section must provide a general description of the local sewer system management program and discuss Plan implementation and updates”.

COMPLIANCE
The City is committed to fully implementing the WDR which includes addressing all requirements by integrating a wide range of programs specifically designed for ensuring the integrity and efficiency of the City’s sanitary sewer collection system. Moreover, the City is dedicated to maintaining its collection system in a systematic manner by implementing various work programs, with a focus on critical areas , to prevent spills, allowing for a comprehensive approach to maintenance.

The City and the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (District) jointly operate and maintain the City’s wastewater collection system. The City is responsible for sewer lines 10” in diameter or less, while the District maintains all sewer lines 12” or greater and pump stations. The City’s work programs include pipe cleaning and manhole inspections. Work programs are described in more detail in Specifications 5.19 – Operation and Maintenance of this SSMP.

By prioritizing proactive measures and taking a comprehensive approach, the City is well-equipped with a proven track record of effectively operating its sanitary sewer collection system with the highest levels of service and reducing/eliminating sewage spills.

EFFECTIVENESS
N/A

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
N/A
168

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 12

1.2. SSMP Update Schedule

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-1.2 (pg. D-3)
“The Plan Introduction section must include a schedule for the Enrollee to update the Plan, including the schedule for conducting internal Audits. The schedule must include milestones for incorporation of activities addressing prevention of sewer spills.”

COMPLIANCE
The City utilizes the State Water Board’s online lookup tool to ensure compliance with all required due dates for updating its SSMP and completing its required SSMP Audits (see chart below). The City completed the most recent Audit, for the period of August 2, 2021 through August 2, 2024 in April 2025. The Audit has been uploaded to CIWQS.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Are SSMP Audits and SSMP Updates being performed as scheduled? • Has the SSMP been approved by the governing board on the required schedule (i.e., every six years)? • Are specific internally established sewer program milestones being monitored?

Figure 2 – Sewer System Management Plan, Subsequent Update and Audit Due Dates 169

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 13

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party
PWD* SUP* MA*

1.2.1 Prepare for next SSMP Audit Begin 5/2/2027 X X

1.2.2 Complete and upload next SSMP Audit By 11/2/2027 X X X

1.2.3 Incorporate Audit findings, update Change
Log and Update SSMP
Begin after completion
of SSMP Audit X X X

1.2.4 Prepare for next SSMP Audit Begin 5/2/2030 X X

1.2.5 Complete and upload next SSMP Audit By 11/2/2030 X X X

1.2.6 Incorporate Audit findings, update Change
Log and Update SSMP
Begin after completion
of SSMP Audit X X X

1.2.7 Prepare for next SSMP Update Begin 2/2/2031 X X X

1.2.8 City Council approval deadline for next SSMP
Update; upload to CIWQS. By 8/2/2031 X X X
PWD* = Public Works Director/City Engineer
SUP*= Public Works Superintendent
MA*= Public Works Department Management Analyst

170

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 14

1.3. Sewer System Asset Overview

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-1.3 (pg. D-3)
“The Plan Introduction section must provide a description of the Enrollee-owned assets and service area, including but not limited to:
• Location, including county(ies);
• Service area boundary;
• Population and community served;
• System size, including total length in miles, length of gravity mainlines, length of pressurized (force) mains, and number of pump stations and siphons; • Structures diverting stormwater to the sewer system;
• Data management systems;
• Sewer system ownership and operation responsibilities between Enrollee and private entities for upper and lower sewer laterals;
• Estimated number or percentage of residential, commercial, and industrial service connections; and
• Unique service boundary conditions and challenge(s).

Additionally, the Plan Introduction section must provide reference to the Enrollee’s up- to-date map of its sanitary sewer system, as required in section 4.1 (Updated Map of Sanitary Sewer System) of this Attachment.”

COMPLIANCE
The City of Suisun City (City) is in Solano County and encompasses approximately 4 square miles.

The City and the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District (District) jointly operate and maintain the City’s wastewater collection system. The District owns and operates the trunk sewer system (all 12-inch diameter and larger pipes), the major pump stations, and the force mains that convey wastewater to the treatment plant on Chadbourne Road in Fairfield. Figure 3, below, is a map of the FSSD service area, including the location of Suisun City.

The City owns and operates approximately 68 miles of small gravity sewer mains that are 10 inches or less in diameter. The City does not own or operate any force mains or pump stations. The City’s sewer system serves approximately 29,518 people in the service area shown in Figure 4, below. Most of the pipelines for which the City is responsible are 6 to 8 inches in diameter, were constructed from 1980 to 2019, and are mainly PVC. Specific details regarding the portion of the gravity sewer system for which the City is responsible for are found in Appendix 1.

The City’s collection system does not include any siphons or stormwater diversion structures.

The City currently manages its collection system data using Excel spreadsheets , assigning work schedules manually based on the District’s priorities and a predetermined cleaning schedule for different zones within the City. However, the City is in the process of transitioning to the Cartegraph CMMS software, which will pre-populate work assignments for improved efficiency and tracking. The District provides CCTV inspections within the City using WinCAN software.
171

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 15

There are approximately 8, 593 service laterals connected to the system. The City owns or operates approximately 8,030, or 35 miles, of these laterals. Although not codified in the Municipal Code , the City’s perspective is that sewer laterals are primarily the responsibility of the homeowner. If the homeowner has a private cleanout (not city-approved), they are responsible for lateral repairs from the building to the public sewer main. However, if the homeowner has a city -approved cleanout, then the City is responsible for the lower lateral from the city -approved cleanout to the public sewer main. This division of responsibility is depicted on a District graphic. In addition, the City’s Design Standards (discussed in Section 5.1) require a back-of-sidewalk cleanout, located in the City’s right-of-way, for all service laterals.

The percentage of residential, commercial, and industrial service connections is shown in Table 3, below.

Overall, the City is in a good position to maintain its collection system. The City has two unique challenges.

The first is the need to coordinate with the City of Fairfield and Travis Air Force Base regarding the District’s treatment plant. This is accomplished, in part, by the fact that t he City Councils of Suisun City and Fairfield sit as the governing body of the District. The second challenge is that the City is adjacent to Suisun Marsh, with an average elevation of 7’ above sea level. The City is a partner to the Solano Bayshore Resiliency Roundtable which is aimed at addressing the impacts of sea level rise and building regional climate resilience.

The City relies on the District to maintain maps of the sanitary sewer system. As stated in the District’s 2025 SSMP: “The District uses GIS to maintain up-to-date maps of its sanitary sewer system. GIS contains gravity line segments and manholes, pump and lift stations, pressure pipes and valves, as well as other relevant information for both FSSD assets, as well as the assets of satellite systems. The District coordinates Figure 3 – City Vicinity Map and Service Area
172

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 16 with the Cities and exchanges GIS related information on an annual basis. Updated maps can be provided to the Regional or State Water Board in electronic or hard copy format as required.”

Use Type Number
Single residential 8,155
Multiple residential 114
Single, multiple commercial and churches 154
Landscape and hydrants 163
Public facilities 7
Total 8,593
Table 3 – City Sewer Connection Flow Classifications and Connections Data Figure 4 – City’s Sewer Collection System
173

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 17

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Are asset statistics periodically reviewed and updated as necessary? • Are omissions or errors addressed in a timely manner? • Are system maps up to date?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

1.3.1 Review City-owned asset statistics and
Element description; update as
necessary.

At the beginning of the Audit cycle
and when significant changes have
been made.

X X X

1.3.2 Notify District of need to update maps. Within 30 d ays of s ubmittal of completion of development project
X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 1 by:
• Implement a system for collecting and managing asset data. • Redundancy: More than one member of staff is trained and able to retrieve and manage the data. • Implementing a QA/QC process to help ensure information is accurate. • Using an Excel database to ensure that timely compliance with deadlines is met.

APPENDIX 1 INCLUSIONS:
• 1.1 Gravity Sewer System Specific Details (size, age)

174

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 18 Specifications 5.2 – SSMP Development and Implementation

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Specification. 5.2 (pg. 18)
“To facilitate adequate local funding and management of its sanitary sewer system(s), the Enrollee shall develop and implement an updated Sewer System Management Plan. The scale and complexity of the Sewer System Management Plan, and specific elements of the Plan, must match the size, scale, and complexity of the Enrollee’s sanitary sewer system(s). The Sewer System Management Plan must address, at minimum, the required Plan elements in Attachment D (Sewer System Management Plan – Required Elements) of this General Order. To be effective, the Sewer System Management Plan must include procedures for the management, operation, and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system(s).

The procedures must: (1) incorporate the prioritization of system repairs and maintenance to proactively prevent spills, and (2) address the implementation of current standard industry practices through available equipment, technologies, and strategies.”

COMPLIANCE
The City's current Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) has been updated to meet the requirements of Order WQ 2022 -0103-DWQ and addresses the required Elements. The SSMP addresses management, operations and maintenance procedures specific to the City’s collection system. The City maintains a proactive O&M program to operate its system and identify defects, which are then prioritized for repair, replacement, reh abilitation, or placed on modified maintenance schedules. (See Elements 4 and 8 and Specifications 5.19 of this SSMP for more detail.)
The City keeps up with current industry standards, technology and best practices by reviewing industry periodicals, networking, attending training classes, and attending industry conferences and workshops. The City evaluates emerging practices, equipment and technologies for possible implementation to enhance sewer operations.

175

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 19 Specifications 5.7 – Allocation of Resources

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Specification. 5.7 (pg. 22)
“The Enrollee shall comply with the following requirements:
• Establish and maintain a means to manage all necessary revenues and expenditures related to the sanitary sewer system; and
• Allocate the necessary resources to its sewer system management program for:
• Compliance with this General Order,
• Full implementation of its updated Sewer System Management Plan, • System operation, maintenance, and repair, and
• Spill responses.”

COMPLIANCE
Suisun City residents pay for both local (Suisun City) and general ( Fairfield-Suisun Sanitary District ) sewer services. The local charge reflects the City’s operation and maintenance costs for sewer lines 10” or less in diameter, while the general charge reflects District’s operation and maintenance costs for the larger sewer lines and the wastewater treatment plant. These charges are combined into one bill, issued and collected by the City.

Section 8.4.2 of the District’s 2025 SSMP describes how Operating and Maintenance (O&M) costs are determined: “The District sets sewer rates, or Sewer Service Charges, for the entire service area. Under an agreement with the cities of Fairfield and Suisun City, both cities collect all Sewer Service Charges for the District and transfer those funds to the District on a monthly basis. Each month, the District remits funds to the Cities to help cover the cost of maintaining local sewer lines that are 10- inches or smaller. The amount is based on the length of each city's sewer system and adjusted yearly for inflation”.

The District also assesse s Sewer Capacity Charges which are one -time fees charged to new or expanded connections to the sewer system. The City collects the Sewer Capacity Charges on behalf of the District.

Every five years the District works with an independent consultant to complete a Cost of Service and Rate Study which reviews and analyzes the District’s historical and budgeted operating costs, multi -year capital program, outstanding debt service obligations, financial plans and policies, and operating and capital reserve targets. The 2022 Sewer Rate and Capacity Charge Study is found on the District’s website.

Prior to 2022, the City only received funding for emergency repairs to its portion of the sewer collection system. However, the current sewer rates include funds for proactive repairs. As further discussed in Section

8.4, the City now receives over $1,000,000/year from the District for capital improvement projects on its sewer system.

176

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 20 Provisions 6.1 – Enforcement Provisions

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Provisions 6.1 (pg. 27)
“The following enforcement provisions are based on existing federal and state regulations, laws and policies, including the federal Clean Water Act, the state Water Code and the State Water Board Enforcement Policy.”

COMPLIANCE
The City is aware of the consequences for noncompliance including associated penalties for violations. The City maintains a proactive stance with full implementation of its SSMP.

Noncompliance with requirements of this General Order or discharging sewage without enrolling in this General Order constitutes a violation of the Water Code and a potential violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for an enforcement action by the S tate Water Board or the applicable Regional Water Board.

Failure to comply with the notification, monitoring, inspection, entry, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements may subject the City to administrative civil liabilities of up to $10,000 a day per v iolation pursuant to Water Code section 13385; up to $1,000 a day per violation pursuant to Water Code section 13268; or referral to the Attorney General for judicial civil enforcement. Discharging waste not in compliance with the requirements of this General Order or the Clean Water Act may subject the City to administrative civil liabilities up to $10,000 a day per violation and additional liability up to $10 per gallon of discharge not cleaned up after the first 1,000 gallons of discharge; up to $5,000 a day per violation pursuant to Water Code section 13350 or up to $20 per gallon of waste discharged; or referral to the Attorney General for judicial civil enforcement.

177

GOAL AND INTRODUCTION

© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 21 Provisions 6.3 – Sewer System Management Plan Availability

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Provisions 6.3 (pg. 31)
“The Enrollee’s updated Sewer System Management Plan must be maintained for public inspection at the Enrollee’s offices and facilities and must be available to the public through CIWQS and/or on the Enrollee’s website, in accordance with Section 3.8 (Sewer System Management Plan Reporting Requirements) of Attachment E1 (Notification, Monitoring, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements) of this General Order.”

COMPLIANCE
The City maintains a paper copy of the SSMP in its offices which can be made available for inspection during regular business hours. The City also published its 2014 SSMP on the City’s website at the Public Works Sewer and Wastewater page. After City Council approval, the City will upload the 2025 SSMP to the same location on its website.

178

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 22

2. Organization

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-2 (pg. D-3)
“The Plan must identify organizational staffing responsible and integral for implementing the local Sewer System Management Plan through an organization chart or similar narrative documentation that includes:
• The name of the Legally Responsible Official as required in section 5.1 (Designation of a Legally Responsible Official) of this General Order;
• The position titles, telephone numbers, and email addresses for management, administrative, and maintenance positions responsible for implementing specific Sewer System Management Plan Element;
• Organizational lines of authority; and
• Chain of communication for reporting spills from receipt of complaint or other information, including the person responsible for reporting spills to the State and Regional Water Boards and other agencies, as applicable. (For example, county health officer, county environmental health agency, and State Office of emergency Services.)”

COMPLIANCE
The above items are addressed in order below:

Authorized Representative:

The City's Legally Responsible Official in all wastewater collection system matters is the Public Works Director/City Engineer, Nouae Vue. Mr. Vue is authorized to certify and submit electronic and non-electronic spill reports for the SWRCB and any other appropriate government agencies. Mr. Vue meets the requirements set forth in Specifications 5.1 of the WDR.

The Public Works’ Management Analyst is also authorized to act in the absence of the Public Works Director.

The Public Works Management Analyst is also authorized to submit SSO reports to the appropriate government agencies.

The Public Works Superintendent is authorized to act in the Public Works Director’s absence. The Public Works Streets Department Supervisor/Senior Maintenance Worker is also authorized to submit SSO reports to the appropriate government agencies.

Responsible Person Contact Information:

The position titles, telephone numbers, and email addresses for management, administrative, and maintenance positions responsible for implementing specific SSMP Elements are found in the Table below.

Responsible Position Contact Information
Responsible Position Contact Information Phone Email
Public Works Director (Nouae Vue) (707) 421-7316 [email protected] 179

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 23 Management Analyst (Amanda Dum) (707) 421-7345 [email protected] Senior Engineer (Nick Lozano) (707) 421-7344 [email protected] Public Works Superintendent (Jim Herrod) (707) 580-0625

[email protected]

Associate Engineer (Maribel De La Cruz) [email protected] Public Works Supervisor (Vacant)
Public Works Senior Maintenance Worker
(Napoleon Diaz) (707) 580-0626 [email protected]

Implementation Responsibilities
The positions responsible for implementing each section of the SSMP are found in Table 5 below.

Table 4 – Responsible Position Contact Information
180

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 24 Sewer System Management Plan Elements Responsible Position

1. SSMP Plan, Goal and Introduction Public Works Director or designee

1.1. Regulatory Context Public Works Director or designee

1.2. SSMP Update Schedule Public Works Director or designee

1.3. Sewer System Asset Overview Public Works Director or designee

2. Organization Public Works Director or designee

3. Legal Authority Consulting City Attorney

4. Operations and Maintenance Program Public Works Director or designee

4.1. Updated maps of Sanitary Sewer System Public Works Director or designee

4.2. Preventive Operation & Maintenance Public Works Director or designee

4.3. Training Public Works Director or designee

4.4. Equipment Inventory Public Works Director or designee

5. Design/Performance Public Works Director or designee

5.1. Updated Design Criteria & Construction
Standards
Public Works Director/City Engineer

5.2. Procedures and Standards Public Works Director/City Engineer

6. Spill Emergency Response Plan Public Works Director or designee

7. Sewer Pipe Blockage Program Public Works Director or designee

8. System Eval, Capacity Assurance, Capital Imp. Public Works Director or designee

8.1. System Evaluation and Condition Assessment Public Works Director or designee

8.2. Capacity Assessment and Design Criteria Public Works Director or designee

8.3. Prioritization of Corrective Action Public Works Director or designee

8.4. Capital Improvement Plan Public Works Director or designee

9. Monitoring, Measurement & Program Modifications Public Works Director or designee

10. Internal Audits Public Works Director or designee

11. Communication Program Public Works Director or designee

Table 5 – Implementation Responsibilities
181

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 25

2.1. Organizational Chart
The following chart depicts the overall organization of the City’s Public Works Department.

Figure 5 – City Organization Chart
182

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 26

2.2. Organizational Staffing Responsibilities
The City’s organizational lines of authority and staffing are as follows:

Public Works Director/City Engineer
Under general administrative direction of the City Manager, plans, directs, manages, and oversees the activities and operations of the Public Works Department including engineering, street maintenance, pavement management program, street lighting, assessment districts, storm drainage, collection system, and equipment maintenance and procurement; facilitates, develops, and implements short and long term goals for the department; coordinates assigned activities with other departments and outside agencies; and provides highly responsible and complex administrative support to the City Manager.

Public Works Superintendent
Under administrative direction of the Public Works Director/City Engineer, directs, manages, supervises, and coordinates the activities and operations of the Maintenance Division within the Public Works Department including operation, maintenance, and repair services and activities related to streets, sidewalks, storm drains, wastewater collection system, and streetlights and traffic control devices; coordinates assigned activities with other divisions, departments, and outside agencies; and provides highly responsible and complex administrative support to the Public Works Director/City Engineer.

Public Works Supervisor
Under general direction of the Public Works Superintendent, supervises, assigns, reviews, and participates in the work of staff responsible for performing a variety of semi-skilled and skilled duties involved in the maintenance, repair, and construction of public works systems including streets, sidewalks, street lights, traffic signals, collection systems, and assessment districts; ensures work quality and adherence to established policies and procedures; and performs the more technical and complex tasks r elative to assigned area of responsibility.

Senior Maintenance Worker
Under general supervision, leads and performs a variety of skilled maintenance, repair and construction work in the completion of maintenance and construction activities and operations of assigned division including streets, traffic signals, street lights, recreation/parks facilities, landscape areas, collection systems, and other public facility maintenance; operates maintenance and construction tools and equipment; performs a variety of maintenance tasks relative to assigned area of responsibility.

Maintenance Worker I and II
Maintenance Worker I – This is the entry-level class in the Maintenance Worker series. This class is distinguished from the Maintenance Worker II by the performance of the more routine tasks and duties assigned to positions within the series including less complex duties. Since this class is typically used as a training class, employees may have limited or no directly related work experience. Advancement to the “II” level is based on demonstrated proficiency in performing the assigned functions, the completion of the minimum experience and education requirements for the “II” level and is at the discretion of higher level supervisory or management staff.

Maintenance Worker II – This is the full journey-level class within the Maintenance Worker series.

Employees within this class are distinguished from the Maintenance Worker I by the performance of the full range of duties as assigned including the performance of the more complex duties. Employees at this level receive only occasional instruction or assistance as new or unusual situations arise and are fully aware of the operating procedures and policies of the work unit. Positions in this class are flexibly staffed 183

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 27 and are normally filled by advancement from level I, or when filled from the outside, require prior experience.

Associate/Senior Associate Engineer
Under supervision (Assistant Engineer), general supervision (Associate Engineer), or minimal supervision (Senior Associate Engineer), performs professional level duties in support of the City’s engineering services and activities including the design, evaluation and construction of street, traffic controls, landscaping, parks, storm drains, sewer, and other public work projects; serves as a project manager on Capital Improvement Projects; reviews engineering reports, drawings, specifications and calculation s for buildings, structures, streets, sewers and other public works facilities to ensure compliance with current industry practices, codes, regulations and ordinances; and responds to questions and inquiries from the general public, developers, contractors, engineering professionals, and City staff regarding engineering and development projects
Management Analyst II
The Management Analyst I/II classes are responsible to perform a wide variety of analytical and administrative duties in support of assigned functions, operations, department, and/or division including special projects, research studies, budget analysis and other specialized functions; coordinate and perform a variety of contract and grant administration duties; prepare various reports to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of operations; coordinate assigned activities with other departments, divisions , outside agencies, and the general public; and provide information and assistance to the public regarding assigned programs and services.

Administrative Assistant
Under direction of assigned management or supervisory staff, performs a wide variety of responsible office support and administrative, technical, programmatic, and secretarial duties; exercising judgment and initiative. Relieves assigned staff of technical as well as general administrative details; and serves as a liaison with other City departments and staff, outside agencies, and the general public including information regarding department policies, procedures, and functions. 184

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 28

2.3. Chain of Communication for Reporting Spills
The City is notified of a spill in multiple ways: observation by the public, observation by City staff during the normal course of their work, or notification by the District.

Public observation is the most common way that the City is notified of blockages and spills. Contact numbers and information for reporting sewer spills and backups are on the City’s Public Works Sewer & Wastewater webpage. The website states “ If you notice a sewer failure, call the Police Dispatch Center immediately at 707-421-7373. Dispatchers are on duty 24/7 and will send the correct staff to address the issue.” City residents may also report problems through the “MyCivic” mobile app.

The public also reports sewer -related concerns to the District. The Report A Spill webpage provides telephone numbers for business hours and after hours.

The SSO chain of communication for responding to spills , Figure 6, is taken from the District’s 2025 SSMP. The location of the spill (whether within City sewer pipes or District sewer pipes) determines the entity responsible for responding to the spill. If the City is responsible for the spill, the LRO or their designee reports the spill to the appropriate agencies and submits the spill report into CIWQS.

Figure 6 –Spill Chain of Communication
185

ORGANIZATION
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 29

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Have there been any changes requiring updates to the Organizational Chart? • Have there been instances when a service call for a spill was not properly routed to response personnel?
• Were all spill response activities documented and forwarded to the LRO? • Have there been any changes in assigned responsibilities for implementing the SSMP? • Is there a process in place to ensure all contact information remains up to date?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

2.1 Review names, contact information and position
responsibilities. Update as necessary. Semi-Annually X X

2.2 Review Chain of Communication outcomes for all spill responses. Each Spill Event X X

2.3 Review Organizational Chart for any changes. Update as necessary. Semi-Annually X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 2 by:
• Ensuring that more than one person is capable and responsible for specific duties for SSMP implementation, e.g., back-up personnel.
• Designation of more than one LRO to help ensure full and continuous coverage of duties. • Testing the phone notification system to ensure calls are received and routed to appropriate personnel.

APPENDIX 2 INCLUSIONS:
• None

186

LEGAL AUTHORITY
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 30

3. Legal Authority

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-3 (pg. D-4)
“The Plan must include copies or an electronic link to the Enrollee’s current sewer system use ordinances, service agreements and/or other legally binding procedures to demonstrate the Enrollee possesses the necessary legal authority to:
• Prevent illicit discharges into its sanitary sewer system from inflow and infiltration (I&I); unauthorized stormwater; chemical dumping; unauthorized debris; roots; fats, oils, and grease; and trash, including rags and other debris that may cause blockages; • Collaborate with storm sewer agencies to coordinate emergency spill responses, ensure access to storm sewer systems during spill events, and prevent unintentional cross connections of sanitary sewer infrastructure to storm sewer infrastructure; • Require that sewer system components and connections be properly designed and constructed; • Ensure access for maintenance, inspection, and/or repairs for portions of the service lateral owned and/or operated by the Enrollee;
• Enforce any violation of its sewer ordinances, service agreements, or other legally binding procedures; and
• Obtain easement accessibility agreements for locations requiring sewer system operations and maintenance, as applicable. “

COMPLIANCE
The Suisun City Municipal Code describes the City’s legal authority required for compliance with the WDR.

That authority is specifically contained within Chapter 13.08- Discharges into Public Sewers. In addition, the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District has adopted a 2017 Wastewater Discharge Ordinance which applies to all users of its POTW, which includes those who discharge into the City’s portion of the sewer collection system.

The above items are addressed in order below:

Authority to prevent illicit discharges into the City’s wastewater collection system.

The City’s Municipal Code, Section 13.08.010 -Prohibited waters and wastes , prohibits the discharge of certain wastes, including gasoline or fuels, hot waste, garbage that has not been shredded, low or high pH waste, noxious gas, garbage, fats, oils, grease, sludges, and toxic materials. Section 2.1.B -Specific Prohibitions of the District’s Ordinance prohibits the discharge of similar items, as well as prohibits the discharge of stormwater, surface waters, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, and FOG to the sewer system.

The City’s pre-planned collaboration and coordination with storm drain agencies.

The City owns and operates most of the storm drains within its boundaries and has a de facto legal authority to ensure access to these storm drains in the event of a wastewater spill. In addition, both Solano County and Caltrans own and operate storm drains within the City limits. The City has historically had good communications with the County, and the City is permitted to do work within their drains as necessary. If a spill were to occur within a County storm drain, the City would clean up the spill. To comply with the WDR requirement, the City will contact the County and Caltrans to discuss a mutual aid agreement to allow the City to respond to any wastewater spills which enter a County or Caltrans storm drain.

187

LEGAL AUTHORITY
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 31 Require that sewer system components and connections be properly designed and constructed.

Section 17.08.160-Improvement Design states, in part, that “ The design and type of improvements shall conform to the city standard details and specifications approved and in use by the city for streets and facilities. Section 17.08.200-Improvement plans and inspections requires that (a) improvement work shall not begin until plans have been submitted and approved by the City engineer, and (b) improvements shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City engineer.

Ensure access for maintenance, inspection, and/or repairs for portions of the service lateral owned and/or operated by the Enrollee.

Although not codified, the City’s perspective is that homeowners are primarily responsible for maintaining sewer laterals. If the homeowner either does not have a private cleanout or has a private cleanout that has not been approved by the City, then the homeowner is responsible for lateral repairs and maint enance from the home all the way to the public sewer main. If the homeowner has a city-approved cleanout, then the City will assume responsibility for the lateral from the cleanout to the public sewer main. The City intends to update its Municipal Code to include this perspective.

Enforce any violation of its sewer ordinances, service agreements, or other legally binding procedures.

Chapter 1.08 - General Penalty of the City’s Municipal Code contains enforcement provisions, including monetary civil penalties . Section 10 of the District’s Wastewater Discharge Ordinance also contains enforcement provisions, including violation notices, consent orders, compliance orders, cease and desist orders, fines, and termination of discharge. The City relies on the District’s “sewer inspector” to act as the City’s sewer inspector (Municipal Code Section 13.08.100- Sewer Inspector).

Obtain easement accessibility agreements for locations requiring sewer system operations and maintenance, as applicable.

Section 17.08.030-Easements states that “easements shall be required on all lots when necessary for public utilities or drainage.” In addition, Section 5 of t he City of Suisun City Design Standards, Standard Specifications, and Details, 1996 includes a Right of Way Policy which states that “all public sewers shall be in easements or rights of way granted or dedicated for sewers or public use.” (Additional discussion is found in Section 5 and Appendix 5.1 of this SSMP).

Potential Municipal Code Updates
The City’s current practice of maintaining and rehabilitating, as necessary, the portion of service laterals located in the public right -of-way, if they have a cleanout at the property line, is undocumented. The City plans to update its Municipal Code to address this practice, provided that applicable design and construction standards are met. In addition, other sections of the City Municipal Code relating to the sewer system should be updated. The City will consider the updates found in the table below.

Topic Updated and/or Additional Language to be Considered Definitions
“FOG” – Fats, Oils, and Grease, including fats, oils, grease, waxes or other related constituents. FOG may be of vegetable or animal origin, including butter, lard, margarine, vegetable fats and oils, and fats in meats, cereals, seeds, nuts, and certain fruits. FOG may also be of mineral origin, including kerosenes, lubricating oil, and road oil. FOG in the wastewater collection system is generally present as, but need not be, a floatable solid, a liquid, a colloid, an emulsion, or in a solution.
188

LEGAL AUTHORITY
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 32 Definitions
“Inflow/Infiltration or I/I” – Waters other than sewage, including groundwater and stormwater, which enter into building and/or community sewers, either at points of direct connection to the system or through defects, including cracks, offset joints and so forth, in the sewer pipes.

Prohibition of
Discharges
FOG Disposal Prohibited. No User shall dispose of any FOG, or cause any FOG to be disposed, by discharge into any drainage piping, by discharge into any community or lateral sewer, by discharge into any storm drainage system, or by discharge to any land, street, public way, river, stream, or other waterway, which causes the User’s discharge to exceed the local limits set forth in Section

3.09. FOG from GRDs shall not be discharged into any community or lateral sewer.

Prohibition of
Discharges
Prohibitions on Unpolluted Water, Storm Drainage, Ground Water, and Inflow or Infiltration. Storm water, ground water, rain water, street drainage, subsurface drainage or yard drainage, or any other I/I or extraneous water shall not be discharged through direct or indirect connections to a community or lateral sewer unless a permit is issued by the City or the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District. Unpolluted water, including but not limited to cooling water, process water or blow-down from cooling towers or evaporative coolers, or diatomaceous earth filter backwash shall not be discharged through direct or indirect connection to a community sewer unless a permit is issued by the City or the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District. The City or the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District may approve such discharge only when no reasonable alternative is available, where such water is determined to cause a pollution hazard if not discharged to the sewer, or when such alternative, in the determination of the City or the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District, is unacceptable.

Authority to
Inspect
The City and its designated agents shall have the authority to inspect the premises of any person discharging waste to the City’s wastewater collection system, including, but not limited to, lateral sewers, any areas or points of sampling, discharge, process, storage, and/or any other areas as deemed reasonable and necessary by the City to document the person’s compliance with the requirements of this Wastewater Discharge Ordinance.

Maintenance
Responsibility
Maintenance of Lateral Sewers, Cleanouts and Connections. All lateral sewers from the building wall to the connection to the community sewer are the property of the owner of the connected building. All property owners whose properties are connected to a community sewer by a lateral sewer, and whose lateral sewer is equipped with an approved cleanout located at or near the property line, shall at their own expense maintain the upper lateral sewer in a fully functioning condition and ensure the lateral sewer is free of cracks, leaks, inflow or infiltration of extraneous water, root intrusion or open joints. All property owners whose properties are connected to a community sewer by a lateral sewer, but whose lateral sewer is not equipped with an approved cleanout at or near the property line, shall at their own expense maintain the entire lateral sewer in similar fully functioning condition. Property owners shall 189

LEGAL AUTHORITY
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 33 ensure that laterals drain freely between the building and the community sewer, including the cleanout where applicable, without excessive sags that collect grease and sediment. A cleanout and an overflow device approved by the director of public works shall be installed and maintained, at the sole expense of the property owner, on all new lateral sewers, or existing lateral sewers found, by the sole interpretation of the City, to have a blockage history or accelerated line maintenance. The cleanout shall be located within the City right-of-way in conformance with City Standard Details.

Requirement
to Insall and
Maintain
Grease
Interceptors

(a) The owner of every newly constructed, remodeled, or converted commercial or industrial facility with one or more grease generating activities, including food service establishments with new or replacement kitchens, shall install or cause to be installed a grease interceptor for each grease generating activity, of a size equal to or greater than the minimum size meeting the definition of "grease interceptor," as defined in the currently adopted edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code. In no case shall any grease interceptor flow less than twenty gallons per minute (gpm). The installation of new garbage disposals in any commercial or industrial facility is prohibited.

(b) The owner of every commercial or industrial generator of grease, including food service establishments, serviced by a sewer collection line found to have a grease blockage, a history of grease blockage, or accelerated line maintenance resulting from grease disposal, shall install or cause to be installed a grease removal device upon notification by the superintendent. If heavy solids accumulate causing a sewer blockage or accelerated line maintenance, the commercial or industrial generator shall remove any garbage disposal upon notification by the City.

(c) All grease removal devices shall be installed on the premises where grease is used or generated and shall be sized in conformance with the then currently adopted edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code. The contents of all grease removal devices shall be removed periodically as necessary to prevent violations of this chapter. At a minimum, the contents shall be removed every six months. All grease removal devices shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in continuous operation. A log of all grease removal activities shall be maintained at the facility showing the date of removal, the amount removed and the disposition of the removed contents. The log shall be retained for a period of three years and shall be available for inspection by City inspectors upon request.

(d) Grease emulsifiers or enzymes are prohibited for use in grease interceptors or traps.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:

Table 6 – Potential Municipal Code Updates
190

LEGAL AUTHORITY
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 34 • Are the City ordinances and standards adequate for fulfilling the SSMP legal requirements? • Does the City have a process in place for periodic review and evaluation of ordinances? • Have there been instances when the code or ordinance did not address a need or circumstance?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

3.1 Review Ordinance(s) to confirm all documents provide necessary required legal authority.

Once per 6-year SSMP
Update Cycle X X X

3.2 Monitor and document occasions when Ordinance(s)
failed to address issues as intended. Continuously X X X

3.3 Confer with storm drain owners to ensure current
practices and contact information are up to date. Annually X

3.4 Contact Caltrans and Solano County to discuss an aid agreement to allow the City to respond to any
wastewater spills which enter a Caltrans or County
storm drain.

By December 31, 2026 X X

3.5 Update City Municipal Code to address the items listed in the “Potential Municipal Code Update” table. By June 30, 2026 X X X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 3 by:
• Keeping abreast of industry trends and local ordinances that may affect operations.

APPENDIX 3 INCLUSIONS
• None

191

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 35

4. Operation and Maintenance Program

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-4 (pg. D-4)
“The Plan must include the items listed below that are appropriate and applicable to the Enrollee’s system.”

4.1. Updated Map of Sewer System

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-4.1 (pg. D-4)
“An up-to-date map(s) of the sanitary sewer system, and procedures for maintaining and providing State and Regional Water Board staff access to the map(s). The map(s) must show gravity line segments and manholes, pumping facilities, pressure pipes and valves, and applicable stormwater conveyance facilities within the sewer system service area boundaries.”

COMPLIANCE
The City relies on the District to maintain maps of the City’s sanitary sewer system. Any corrections are relayed to District staff who then use GIS to update the map.

The District’s 2025 Sewer System Management Plan states “The District uses GIS to maintain up-to-date maps of its sanitary sewer system. GIS contains gravity line segments and manholes, pump and lift stations, pressure pipes and valves, as well as other relevant information for both FSSD assets, as well as the assets of satellite systems. The District coordinates with the Cities and exchanges GIS related information on an annual basis.

Updated maps can be provided to the Regional or State Water Board in electronic or hard copy format as required.”

The City is only responsible for gravity sewers 10” or less in diameter and manholes. With respect to the gravity sewers, the District’s maps for the City include pipe ID, diameter, pipe material, flow direction, location with reference to streets, type of pipe (i.e., siphon, sanitary sewer, stub, etc.), cleanouts, and status. With respect to manholes, the District’s maps for the City include manhole ID, location with reference to streets, and type (standard or diversion).

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Were all map updates completed in a timely manner?
• Are all staff trained in the procedure for providing map update information? • Are newly installed sewer assets incorporated into the system maps? • Are there terrain features or assets that should be incorporated in future map updates (e.g. exposed pipe, siphons, ARVs, surface water, etc.)
192

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 36

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

4.1.1 Review map update procedures with all affected staff. Annually X

4.1.2 Review/ensure all newly installed facilities have been updated and included in the system maps. Annually X X X

193

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 37

4.2. Preventive Operation and Maintenance Activities

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-4.2 (pgs. D-4/D-5)
“A scheduling system and a data collection system for preventive operation and maintenance activities conducted by staff and contractors. The scheduling system must include:
• Inspection and maintenance activities;
• Higher-frequency inspections and maintenance of known problem areas, including areas with tree root problems;
• Regular visual and closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspections of manholes and sewer pipes.

The data collection system must document data from system inspection and maintenance activities, including system areas/components prone to root -intrusion potentially resulting in system backup and/or failure.”

COMPLIANCE
In general, the City does not schedule its routine cleaning and inspection activities. Instead, the City relies on the District to inform the City as to which portion of the City’s collection system will be cleaned and CCTV’ed each year. See Figure 7 in Specifications 5.19 Element.

However, the City does schedule hot spot cleaning annually. This is currently done using paper forms and Excel spreadsheets. However, the City has purchased Cartegraph and will use this CMMS to schedule and manage hot spot cleaning beginning early 2026.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Are the City’s maintenance, operations, and engineering work orders periodically audited for accuracy and completeness?
• Does the City monitor “open,” “overdue,” or “not yet completed” work orders to ensure completion of tasks?
• Are inspection and maintenance activities reducing the number and volume of spills? • Is maintenance work being completed as scheduled?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

4.2.1 Review work completed to date to ensure critical
work is being completed. Semi-annually X X

4.2.2 Review scheduled Preventative Maintenance to
ensure the prescribed schedule remains appropriate. Annually X X

4.3.3 Fully transition to Cartegraph for scheduling and data collection.

December 31,
2025 X
194

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 38

4.3. Training

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-4.3 (pg. D-5)
“In-house and external training provided on a regular basis for sanitary sewer system operations and maintenance staff and contractors. The training must cover:
• The requirements of this General Order;
• The Enrollee’s Spill Emergency Response Plan procedures and practice drills; • Skilled estimation of spill volume for field operators; and • Electronic CIWQS reporting procedures for staff submitting data.”

COMPLIANCE
The City employs a combination of in -house and/or on -the-job training, conferences, seminars, and other opportunities to train its collection system operations and maintenance personnel. After a training event is concluded, a description of the event and the number of hours is recorded in a personnel database.

The District coordinates an in-house training course every two years which covers general WDR requirements and the District’s SERP. This training is designed for District staff and its satellite agencies, including Suisun City. The most recent training was on November 12, 2025.

Shortly after completion of the Cit’s SERP, the City will provide a comprehensive training that covers the requirements of this WDR. After that, refresher training will be conducted annually With respect to contractors, the City has developed the document Spill Response Instructions for Contractors/Contracted Services (Appendix 4.1). Moving forward, the City will ensure that contractors who work on or near the sewer collection system are instructed by City staff on the process to follow in the event of a spill and will be provided with the spill response instructions.

The City will develop language requiring contractors working on City sewer facilities to be adequately trained for sanitary sewer collection system work.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Has all training been completed as scheduled?
• Have records of training and attendance been documented and maintained? • Have all staff demonstrated ability and knowledge after each training event? • Have contractors received, at a minimum, direction for reporting and responding to spills?

195

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 39

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE

PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

4.3.1 Review training documentation to ensure all staff have received required training. Semi-annually X X

4.3.2 Review agreements with contractors and/or pre-job meeting minutes to ensure contract personnel have
received instruction for responding to sewage spills.

Each Contract X X

4.3.3 Conduct comprehensive training regarding all aspects of the up-to-date SERP including flow measurement
and practice drills.

By June 30,
2026 X X

4.3.4 Conduct refresher training on the SERP, including flow measurement. Annually X X

196

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 40

4.4. Equipment Inventory

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Att. D-4.4 (pg. D-5)
“An inventory of sewer system equipment, including the identification of critical replacement and spare parts.”

COMPLIANCE
The major equipment utilized by the City for sewer cleaning and emergency response is a vacuum truck, vacuum trailer, sewer jetter, and a 4” trash pump.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Have inventory lists been audited as scheduled?
• Have any inventory deficiencies or omissions been discovered and rectified? • Has the City experienced any equipment failure that inhibited a spill response?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

4.4.1 Audit inventory lists to ensure stock is adequate. Annually X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 4 by:
• Developing an SOP for updating maps when errors are discovered. • Developing and using forms (paper or electronic) for data collection to help ensure all pertinent information is consistently collected.
• Periodically evaluating inspection cycle intervals to help ensure they are optimized. • Requiring staff to demonstrate ability and/or knowledge for all training activities. • Monitoring equipment and critical spare parts usage and trends. • Performing periodic audits of the vehicle and equipment inventory List.

APPENDIX 4 INCLUSIONS:
• 4.1 Spill Response Instructions for Contractors/Contracted Services

197

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 41 Specifications 5.19 – Operations and Maintenance

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Specification. 5.19 (pg. 27)
“To prevent discharges to the environment, the Enrollee shall maintain in good working order, and operate as designed, any facility or treatment and control system designed to contain sewage and convey it to a treatment plant.”

COMPLIANCE
The City is responsible for gravity sewer lines that are 10” in diameter or less and the associated manholes.

The City is not responsible for gravity sewer lines 12” or greater in diameter, force mains or pump stations.

Gravity Sewer Maintenance
The City cleans 20% of its sewer lines each year in conjunction with the District’s annual Program for CCTV’ing of the lines. The District informs the City as to which portion of the City’s collection system will be cleaned and CCTV’ed each year, as shown in Figure 7. The City and District work together, with City staff hydro - cleaning the line followed im mediately by District staff completing the CCTV. Each yearly cleaning/CCTV takes up to three months to complete. If a problem is found, then staff note the issue on their map and schedule repairs. Beginning in 2026, staff will use Cartegraph to record problems and repairs.

Figure7 – Schedule for Cleaning City Sewer Lines
198

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 42 Hot Spots
The City keeps track of hot spots and cleans them annually with its jet/vac truck. Current hot spot locations are listed below; these may vary over time.
• Solano Street & Kellogg Street • Morgan Street & School Street • Driftwood Drive & Main Street • Lotz Way & Josiah Circle • Village Drive • Blossom Avenue & Chyrl Way
• Avalon Way • Trumpeter Drive & Trumpeter Court
• Shannon Drive & Terry Lane
Manhole Inspection Program
Manholes are inspected while cleaning the gravity lines. If a problem is found, the issue is noted, and repairs are completed within a few weeks.

Smart Covers
The City collection system does not include Smart Covers.

Root Foaming
The City does not have a contract for root foaming.

Private Sewer Laterals
If a homeowner has a city -approved cleanout, then City staff will clean and maintain the lower lateral from the city-approved cleanout to the public sewer main. This cleaning is completed while staff are cleaning the gravity laterals on the street. However, if the homeowner either does not have a cleanout or has a non-city approved cleanout, then staff will not clean the lateral, and the homeowner is responsible for maintenance of the entire lateral. This division of responsibility is depicted on a District graphic.

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

5.19.1 Maintain inspection, maintenance, and spill
information in CMMS (i.e., Cartegraph).

Beginning December
31, 2025 X

5.19.2 Develop standard operating procedures for the
addition and removal of lines from the hot spot
program.

By June 30, 2026 X

5.19.3 In conjunction with the District, define and
implement a formal manhole inspection program
based upon the NASSCO Manhole Assessment
Certification Program (MACP) rating system.

By June 30,2026 X X X
199

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 43

5. Design and Performance Provisions

5.1. Updated Design Criteria/Construction Standards/Specifications

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-5.1 (pg. D-5)
“Updated design criteria, and construction standards and specifications, for the construction, installation, repair, and rehabilitation of existing and proposed system infrastructure components, including but not limited to pipelines, pump stations, and other system appurtenances. If existing design criteria and construction standards are deficient to address the necessary component-specific hydraulic capacity as specified in section 8 (System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and Capital Improvements) of this Attachment, the procedures must include component-specific evaluation of the design criteria.”

COMPLIANCE
The City’s standards regarding the design and construction of gravity sewer systems, sewer force mains, and other facilities are found in the City of Suisun City Design Standards, Standard Specifications, and Details, 1996 (Standards) (Appendix 5.1). The Standards are intended to be used by developers, consultants, and others to provide the City with consistent, functional, reliable, and user-friendly facilities.

Section 5 of the Standards addresses the design of the sewer system. The Standards address sizing, flows, capacity, laterals, appurtenances, and unusual design, including force mains. Because the City does not own or operate any gravity sewers greater than 10 inches in diameter, the Standards state that sewer lines 12 inches in diameter or larger must be designed in accordance with Fairfield-Suisun Sanitary District standards.

This Section also includes a Right of Way Policy which states that “all public sewers shall be in easements or rights of way gran ted or dedicated for sewers or public use.” The S ection also has an Annexation Policy which states that all properties served by the sewer line must annex to the City.

Section 5 of the Standards requires the provision of a back -of-sidewalk cleanout for all service laterals. The location of the required cleanout is in the City's right-of-way.

Section 5.02F pertains to laterals, and states that all service laterals shall have a cleanout located within the City right-of-way, at the back of the sidewalk. Section 5.02H of the Standards states that the design of special or unusual features or structures require individual study and approval by the City Engineer and the Fairfield- Suisun Sewer District Engineer.

The City will consider updating and/or improving its existing standards for Design, Construction, Inspection, and Testing, as described in Section 5.2.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Are plan checking QA/QC processes helping to ensure adherence to the standards?

200

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 44

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

5.1.1 Ensure all project plans are approved in accordance with the City’s Standard Details and Specifications. Each Project X

5.1.2 Update City’s Design, Construction, and Inspection Standards to address the items listed in the “Potential Updates” table.

By December
31, 2026 X X

201

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 45

5.2. Procedures and Standards

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-5.2 (pg. D-5)
“Procedures, and standards for the inspection and testing of newly constructed, newly installed, repaired, and rehabilitated system pipelines, pumps, and other equipment and appurtenances.”

COMPLIANCE
The City’s procedures and standard for inspection of new or rehabilitated components of the sewer system are also found in the City of Suisun City Design Standards, Standard Specifications, and Details, 1996 (Standards) (Appendix 5.1).

The Specific Provisions contain general information regarding the need for inspections, while Sections 2 and 3 describe specific testing requirements for materials and earthwork. Section 13 is specific to the inspection and testing of new or rehabilitated sewer lines and appurtenances. Lines that are 12” in diameter or greater shall also be inspected and tested according to the Fairfield- Suisun Sewer District standards and subject to approval by the FSSD Engineer prior to acceptance by the City.

Updates and/or Improvements
The City will consider updating and/or improving its existing standards for Design, Construction, Inspection, and Testing of its wastewater collection system facilities. These updates and/or improvements are summarized below.

Topic Category Update/Improvement to be Considered
Gravity Sewers Details
Require specific PVC installation specification (instead of just manufacturer’s recommendation).

Gravity Sewers Inspection
Require results of the CCTV inspection to be recorded on DVD.

Reference District’s CCTV codes and format.

Gravity Sewers Testing
Address the required increase in air pressure when using the low- pressure air test to test sewers that are below the level of the groundwater (to compensate for the outside water pressure).

Lateral
Connections Design
Address lateral connections that are not constructed as part of a sewer main project.

Lateral
Connections Design
Require a backflow prevention device on laterals connecting to house with a finish floor elevation less than 12-inches above the rim of the closest upstream manhole.

Laterals Construction
Increase robustness of specification for temporary cap/plug on lateral end (the part that gets extended to the house).

Laterals Details
Require cap and a cover box on cleanout risers. (If a car drives over the cleanout, the load should not be transferred to the riser and lateral.)
202

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 46 Manholes Details
Clarify detail/specification to indicate that pickholes should not go all the way through the lid (infiltration potential). Do not allow vent holes.

Manholes Details Require eccentric cone on manholes to be rotated with "straight" portion over the outgoing pipe. (This orientation facilitates CCTV inspection.)
Manholes Details Require a pre-formed plastic sealing gasket (conforming to Federal Specification SS-S 00210) between precast manhole barrel segments. Require wrapping manhole joints with infiltration product (e.g., Infi-Shield) in addition to currently specified grout.

Manholes Details Delete the weep hole detail (or move it to storm drain detail SD-3).

Require heavier base if necessary to resist uplift.

Manholes Details Increase robustness of poured manhole base specification/detail for areas with high groundwater (to increase protection against infiltration).

Manholes Details Add “Sewer” to sewer lid detail.

Manholes Testing Add vacuum testing procedure for manholes.

Rehab/Repair Design
Add standards for major rehab methods such as CIPP lining, crown spraying, pipe bursting, chemical grouting, and root control.

Rehab/Repair Design Specify the contractor license required for chemical root control (license should be for pesticide/herbicide application issued by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation). Update specification to cover the use of chemical root controls without grouting.

Rehab/Repair Construction In flow control specification, require the contractor to have an overflow response plan or to take the kind of precautions that should be required to prevent an overflow in the event of a pump around system failure.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Were any design or installation deficiencies found during warranty inspections? • Are deviations from standard procedures and/or specs, testing, etc., justified and documented? • Does the City stay abreast of industry design standards and technical advances in the industry? Table 7 –Potential Updates to City’s Design, Construction, and Inspection Standards 203

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 47

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

5.2.1 Verify inspection procedures are adequate and consistent with current standards of practice
Assessed
annually X

5.2.2 Verify design standards and hydraulic model previously completed are adequate and consistent with current
standards of practice.

Annually X

5.2.3 Update City’s Design, Construction, and Inspection Standards to address the items listed in the “Potential Updates” table.

By December
31, 2026 X X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 5 by:
• Staying abreast of industry trends and standards.
• Performing warranty inspections of newly installed or repaired assets to evaluate design and installation practices.
• Evaluating as-built changes for trends and areas for design and performance improvements.

APPENDIX 5 INCLUSIONS:
• 5.1. Relevant sections of the City of Suisun City Design Standards, Standard Specifications, and Details, 1996.

204

SPILL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 48

6. Spill Emergency Response Plan

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-6 (pg. D-6)
“The Plan must include an up- to-date Spill Emergency Response Plan to ensure prompt detection and response to spills to reduce spill volumes and collect information for prevention of future spills. The Spill Emergency Response Plan must include procedures to:
• Notify primary responders, appropriate local officials, and appropriate regulatory agencies of a spill in a timely manner;
• Notify other potentially affected entities (for example, health agencies, water suppliers, etc.) of spills that potentially affect public health or reach waters of the State; • Comply with the notification, monitoring and reporting requirements of this General Order, State law and regulations, and applicable Regional Water Board Orders; • Ensure that appropriate staff and contractors implement the Spill Emergency Response Plan and are appropriately trained;
• Address emergency system operations, traffic control and other necessary response activities; • Contain a spill and prevent/minimize discharge to waters of the State or any drainage conveyance system;
• Minimize and remediate public health impacts and adverse impacts on beneficial uses of waters of the State;
• Remove sewage from the drainage conveyance system;
• Clean the spill area and drainage conveyance system in a manner that does not inadvertently impact beneficial uses in the receiving waters;
• Implement technologies, practices, equipment, and interagency coordination to expedite spill containment and recovery;
• Implement pre-planned coordination and collaboration with storm drain agencies and other utility agencies/departments prior, during, and after a spill event; • Conduct post-spill assessments of spill response activities; • Document and report spill events as required in this General Order; and • Annually, review and assess effectiveness of the Spill Emergency Response Plan, and update the Plan as needed.”

COMPLIANCE
The City has contracted with Fischer Compliance LLC to prepare a Spill Emergency Response Plan (SERP) that complies with the WDR. It is expected that the revised SERP will be completed by December 2025, at which time this SSMP’s Change Log will be updated to reflect development of the SERP.

Shortly after completion of the SERP, the City will provide a comprehensive training that covers the requirements of this WDR. After that, r efresher training will be conducted annually. A copy of the revised SERP will be available for viewing at the City office upon request and will be uploaded to the City’s website at the Public Works Sewer and Wastewater page.

205

SPILL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 49

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Have staff’s spill response efforts helped to prevent the discharge of sewage to surface waters? • Do post-spill assessments indicate staff are following the procedures outlined in the SERP? • Is SERP training effective and are trainees demonstrating adequate knowledge and abilities?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

6.1 Conduct SERP training including practice drills. Annually X X

6.2 Review Post Spill Assessments to ensure
adherence with the SERP and to identify any
trends that should be addressed.

Annually X X

6.3 Prepare an up-to-date SERP that meets the
requirements of Attachment D-6 of the WDR. By December 31, 2025 X X

6.4 Conduct comprehensive training regarding all
aspects of the up-to-date SERP including flow
measurement and practice drills.

By June 30, 2026 X X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 6 by:
• Multiple staff are trained to respond to spill events. • Post-spill assessments are conducted to evaluate staff’s adherence to the SERP and to identify areas for improvement.
• Data collection forms are used to direct staff to collect all the required data to be submitted to CIWQS and are designed as a guide to a proper spill event response. • The City uses several different spill volume estimation methods to account for different circumstances.

APPENDIX 6 INCLUSIONS:
• None

206

SEWER PIPE BLOCKAGE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 50

7. Sewer Pipe Blockage Program

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-7 (pg. D-7)
“The Sewer System Management Plan must include procedures for the evaluation of the Enrollee’s service area to determine whether a sewer pipe blockage control program is needed to control fats, oils, grease, rags and debris. If the Enrollee determines that a program is not needed, the Enrollee shall provide justification in its Plan for why a program is not needed.

The procedures must include, at minimum:
• An implementation plan and schedule for a public education and outreach program that promotes proper disposal of pipe-blocking substances;
• A plan and schedule for the disposal of pipe-blocking substances generated within the sanitary sewer system service area. This may include a list of acceptable disposal facilities and/or additional facilities needed to adequately dispose of substances generated within a sanitary sewer system service area;
• The legal authority to prohibit discharges to the system and identify measures to prevent spills and blockages.
• Requirements to install grease removal devices (such as traps or interceptors), design standards for the removal devices, maintenance requirements, best management practices requirements, recordkeeping and reporting requirements;
• Authority to inspect grease producing facilities, enforcement authorities, and whether the Enrollee has sufficient staff to inspect and enforce the fats, oils, and grease ordinance; • An identification of sanitary sewer system sections subject to fats, oils, and grease blockages and establishment of a cleaning schedule for each section; and • Implementation of source control measures for all sources of fats, oils, and grease reaching the sanitary sewer system for each section identified above.”

COMPLIANCE
This section of the City’s SSMP is similar to the FOG Control section of the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District’s SSMP. The District coordinates with both Fairfield and Suisun City on blockage control activities because FOG and debris from the two City’s smaller sewer pipes can impact the District’s larger sewer pipes and pum p stations.

The WDR’s requirements above are addressed below:

Public Outreach
Suisun City has not experienced a F OG-related SSO since 2018, while the District has not had any FOG - related SSOs since 2014. The entities have determined that the infrequent FOG spills do not warrant an extensive public education outreach program. However, the District does have limited information relating to proper FOG disposal on its website. The City’s website does not currently have any information regarding proper disposal of FOG; however, the City intends to add information to its Public Works Sewer & Wastewater page.

If City staff find significant FOG as they are cleaning lines, they will provide a door hanger (Appendix 7.1) to residents.
207

SEWER PIPE BLOCKAGE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 51 Disposal
FOG which is generated by Food Service Establishments (FSEs)is collected in grease interceptors or grease traps which are maintained by the FSEs. The accumulated FOG is pumped out by licensed haulers hired by the FSEs and taken to the haulers’ own facilities. The City’s sewer maintenance crew also removes FOG in the collection system during routine maintenance activities. This grease is disposed of on an as -needed basis at the District’s WWTP.

Legal authority to prohibit discharges.

The City’s Municipal Code includes Section 13.08.010- Prohibited waters and wastes. The Section includes the prohibition of “any water or waste which may contain more than one hundred parts per million, by weight, of fat, oil, or grease” as well as the prohibition of “any waters or wastes containing suspended solids or dissolved matter of such character and quantity that unusual attention or expense is required to handle such materials at the sewage treatment plant.”
The District’s Wastewater Discharge Ordinance prohibits “solid or viscous substances in amounts which will cause obstruction of the flow in the POTW resulting in interference” (Section 2.1.B(3)) and “FOG which causes the User’s discharge to exceed the local limits set forth in Section 2.4, or FOG dis posal from any GRD” (Section 2.1.B(16).

As described in Section 3 (Legal) of this SSMP, the City will consider updating its Municipal Code to provide additional specificity regarding (a) the definition of FOG and (b) the prohibition of FOG discharges.

Requirement to install grease interceptors, design standards, etc.

The City’s Municipal Code includes Section 13.08.020- Grease, oil and sand interceptors - required when.

This Section states that grease interceptors are required when the City or FSSD inspector determines that they are necessary. Design standards are not provided other than “…interceptors shall be of a type and capacity approved by the inspector…” Section 13.080.030- Grease, oil and sand interceptors -Maintenance states that interceptors shall be maintained by the owner in “continuously efficient operation.” The FSSD Wastewater Discharge Ordinance contains the same language in Section 3.2.B.

Given the potential for new development in the City, it would be prudent to proactively require the installation of GRDs for any new or remodelled FS E, not just those that City inspectors have deemed problematic. It would also be appropriate to include design standards for GRDs. Therefore, as described in Section 3 (Legal) of this SSMP, the City will consider updating its Municipal Code to provide additional specificity regarding the installation and design of GRDs.

Authority to inspect and enforce.

The City relies on the “sewer inspector” of the FSSD to act as the City’s sewer inspector (Municipal Code Section 13.08.100- Sewer Inspector). Section 7.1 of the FSSD Wastewater Discharge Ordinance states that FSSD representatives “shall have the right to enter the premises of any User to determine whether the User is complying with all requirements of this ordinance…” Section 10 describes various administrative enforcement remedies, including noti ces of violation, consent orders, show cause hearings, compliance orders, and administrative civil penalties.

FOG-related problem areas.

As described in Section 5.19, the City has currently identified nine FOG problem areas and proactively cleans these areas on an annual basis. If the City finds additional problem areas, it will add them to the annual cleaning list. In addition, the District implements a FOG control program for the 12” or greater lines within Suisun City. Currently, the District has identified three (3) areas which it has placed on an accelerated cleaning schedule.
208

SEWER PIPE BLOCKAGE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 52 Source control measures.

The City and the District manage blockage control by preventative maintenance, spill-related outreach, and FSE targeted outreach. The City relies on the District and Solano County to inspect and take enforcement actions on FSEs. According to the District’s Sewer System Management Plan, “The District manages storm-water inspections by contract with the County and has included targeted outreach and education as part of Food Service Establishment (FSE) inspections. The District has expanded the scope of FSE storm-water inspection contract with the County to both collect information on restaurant grease handling practices throughout FSSD’s service area and distribute educational material about proper FOG disposal. The goal of the inspections is to expand understanding of restaurants’ grease management practices, increase FSE awareness on best management practices, and improve grease removal device (GRD) maintenance practices to reduce FOG. The District can provide information on haulers and disposal facilities that serve the service area with FSEs as needed or upon request. The County inspections provide data that are used in outreach to FSEs. Inspection data is used to analyze the practices of problem FSEs and to develop strategies to educate and improve FSE grease handling practices.”
Solano County inspectors ask FSEs about their process for collecting and disposing of grease and confirm that appropriately licensed haulers are removing the waste. If there is a violation, then the City or District is expected to follow up. If there is a complaint, then the District is to respond. The City intends to proactively coordinate with the County and District to learn the results of inspections, violations, and complaints.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Have there been any blockages/spills from any identified problem area? • Is the City receiving feedback on public outreach efforts? • Are the debris and other sewage solids collected during cleaning activities being disposed of appropriately?
• Have there been spills due to excessive fats, oil, grease, roots, or non-dispersible wipes discovered in the sewer system during the Audit period?
• Are there repeat offenders among FSEs?
• Are enforcement trends decreasing?
• Are Source Control and Collection staff included in the plan check process?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

7.1 Ask Solano County and the District to provide status reports detailing the FSEs inspected, inspection results, and any enforcement taken. Take action if necessary.

Semi-
annually X X

7.2 Review spill rates and causes and make changes to
maintenance programs, as necessary. Annually X
209

SEWER PIPE BLOCKAGE PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 53

7.3 Prepare educational information about FOG and post on City website.

June 30,
2026 X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 7 by:
• Inspection of select assets directly downstream of grease producing businesses to ensure source control is effective.
• Residential FOG outreach and education program.
• Performance of regular assessments of system assets to monitor performance. • QA/QA process for evaluating pipe cleaning effectiveness. • Daily disposal of pipe blocking materials retrieved during maintenance activities.

APPENDIX 7 INCLUSIONS:
• City’s FOG door-hanger
210

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 54

8. System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance, Capital Improvements

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-8 (pg. D-7/D-8)
“The Plan must include procedures and activities for:
• Routine evaluation and assessment of system conditions; • Capacity assessment and design criteria;
• Prioritization of corrective actions; and
• A capital improvement plan.”

8.1. System Evaluation and Condition Assessment

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-8.1 (pgs. D-7/D-8)
“The Plan must include procedures to:
• Evaluate the sanitary sewer system assets utilizing the best practices and technologies available;
• Identify and justify the amount (percentage) of its system for its condition to be assessed each year;
• Prioritize the condition assessment of system areas that:
• Hold a high level of environmental consequences if vulnerable to collapse, failure, blockage, capacity issues, or other system deficiencies;
• Are located in or within the vicinity of surface waters, steep terrain, high groundwater elevations, and environmentally sensitive areas;
• Are within the vicinity of a receiving water with a bacterial -related impairment on the most current Clean Water Act section 303(d) List.
• Assess the system conditions using visual observations, video surveillance and/or other comparable system inspection method;
• Utilize observations/evidence of system conditions that may contribute to exiting of sewage from the system which can reasonably be expected to discharge into a water of the State; • Maintain documents and recordkeeping of system evaluation and condition assessment inspections and activities; and
• Identify system assets vulnerable to direct and indirect impacts of climate change, including but not limited to: sea level rise; flooding and/or erosion due to increased storm volumes, frequency, and/or intensity; wildfires; and increased power disruptions.”

211

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 55

COMPLIANCE
The above requirements are addressed below:

System Evaluation:

The City’s collection system evaluation involves the components of the collection system maintained by the City (i.e., pipelines 10” or smaller and manholes ). It is of key importance to regularly perform pipeline condition assessments to initially establish a baseline condition and to monitor changes over time. The City uses visual inspections, CCTV inspections completed by the District , and spill data to evaluate the performance of system assets and adjust, as necessary.

Justify the amount of system assessed each year:

The City has maintained its system with a low spill rate; the last reported spill from the City -maintained portion of the collection system was in 2018. The District performs CCTV inspections of 20% of the City’s pipelines each year. Given the minimal spill rate, the City believes this is an acceptable inspection frequency.

Prioritize condition assessment areas:

The City does not currently prioritize condition assessments based on environmental consequences or proximity to surface waters but intends to do so in the future.

Assess system using visual observations, etc.:

The City mainly assesses its system condition using visual observation and line cleaning. The City relies on the District to complete video surveillance of its system.

Evidence of flow exiting from system:

The City is currently not aware of any sewage that exits the collection system. The City actively inspects and maintains its collection system to prevent sewage from exiting and impacting the environment.

Maintain documents:

The City maintains most inspections, maintenance, and system evaluations i n Excel databases. Beginning in early 2026, data will be captured in Cartegraph CMMS. The City relies on the District for updating maps using the District’s GIS program. Records are currently stored at the City office.

Climate change:

The City is collaborating with the District, the Cities of Fairfield, Benicia, and Vallejo, and other local entities to evaluate vulnerabilities and develop an action plan to mitigate impacts of sea level rise. This effort is taking place through the Solano Bayshore Resiliency Roundtable. The purpose of the Roundtable is to foster resilient projects and citizen engagement through shared values, joint initiatives, and coordinated efforts.

The Solano Bayshore Resiliency Project is funded by the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, Regional Resilience Grant Program.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Has the City maintained its schedule for inspecting its sewer assets and is data being reviewed in a timely manner?
• Are inspection efforts discovering deficiencies in a timely manner? • Are maintenance and inspection activities being properly documented? 212

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 56

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

8.1.1 Review/evaluate enforcement and inspection findings and implement changes as necessary. Annually X

8.1.2 Review spill rates and causes and make changes to maintenance programs, as necessary. Annually X X

8.1.3 Prioritize condition assessments based on environmental consequences.

Beginning
June 30, 2026 X X

8.1.4 Continue to participate in the Solano Bayshore Resiliency Project. Continuously X X

213

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 57

8.2. Capacity Assessment and Design Criteria

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-8.2 (pgs. D-8/D-9)
“The Plan must include procedures to identify system components that are experiencing or contributing to spills caused by hydraulic deficiency and/or limited capacity, including procedures to identify the appropriate hydraulic capacity of key system elements for:
• Dry-weather peak flow conditions that cause or contributes to spill events; • The appropriate design storm(s) or wet weather events that causes or contributes to spill events. • The capacity of key system components; and
• Identify the major sources that contribute to the peak flows associated with sewer spills. • The capacity assessment must consider:
• Data from existing system condition assessments, system inspections, system audits, spill history, and other available information;
• Capacity of flood-prone systems subject to increased infiltration and inflow, under normal local and regional storm conditions;
• Capacity of systems subject to increased infiltration and inflow due to larger and/or higher - intensity storm events as a result of climate change;
• Increases of erosive forces in canyons and streams near underground and above-ground system components due to larger and/or higher-intensity storm events; • Capacity of major system elements to accommodate dry weather peak flow conditions, and updated design storm and wet weather events; and
• Necessary redundancy in pumping and storage capacities.”

COMPLIANCE
The City has not completed a Master Plan or other type of capacity assessment but intends to do so.

The future evaluation and capacity assurance of City sewers will include continued observation of system performance during wet weather, expansion of the hydraulic model as needed, and enforcement of design standards to ensure that new sewers are sized with adequate capacity to serve new development. In the future, the City plans to prepare a Master Plan for its sanitary sewer system, which will be coordinated with the District’s Master Plan and hydraulic model, in order to develop a capital improvement program to address any identified capacity issues.

The City will develop design and capacity evaluation criteria, including an appropriate design event to be used for the assessment and design of sanitary sewers within its collection system.

The Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District completed a Sewer System Master Plan in 2013 and a Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Update in February 2020. The District’s Master Plan only covers the District’s collection system (12” and larger trunk sewers) and does not include the City’s smaller sewer lines. As described in the District’s Sewer System Management Plan , The District’s Master Plan includes flow monitoring, an update of land use projections based on the Cities’ general plans, quantification of existing and projected design flows, hydraulic modeling of the District’s trunk sewer facilities, identification of capacity deficiencies, and recommendations for capacity -driven capital improvement projects. Priority projects are incorporated into the District’s CIP. In addition, “the District is embarking on a Master Plan 214

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 58 update and is developing a Request for Proposals for the effort. Consultant selection and contract award is anticipated by late Summer 2025.”

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Number of capacity-related spills or surcharge condition during the Audit period. • Has the system responded to rain events as indicated by the hydraulic model? • Has there been any changes to zoning designations (residential, commercial, industrial)?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

8.2.1 Prepare and/or revise City’s hydraulic model;
include design storm parameters. By December 31, 2025 X

8.2.2 Monitor/evaluate significant rain events to see
if they exceed the design storm in the hydraulic
model.

Each significant rain
event X X

8.2.3 Enforce design standards to ensure new sewers
are sized with adequate capacity.

Each development
proposal X

8.2.4 Monitor flows in each basin and update the
hydraulic model. Semi-annually X

8.2.5 Prepare a Wastewater Master Plan that
considers all factors listed in Attachment D,
Section 8.2 of the WDR.

By December 31, 2026 X

215

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 59

8.3. Prioritization of Corrective Action

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-8.3 (pg. D-9)
“The findings of the condition assessments and capacity assessments must be used to prioritize corrective actions. Prioritization must consider the severity of the consequences of potential spills.”

COMPLIANCE
The City does not yet have its own Master Plan or condition assessment. However, it is has recently begun to receive over $1 million per year from the District. As discussed in Section 8.4, these funds will be used for CIP projects. Moving forward, the City intends to prioritize its CIP projects based, in part, on the potential for spills and will document how projects were selected for funding.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Has the City adhered to its system evaluation/condition assessment schedule? • Has the City adhered to its prioritization/corrective procedures for sewer repair and capacity improvement projects?
• Have projects been completed before deficiencies caused failures?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

8.3.1 Utilize all available data for prioritizing corrective actions considering severity and consequences of
potential spills.

Each CIP Update X X

8.3.2 Maintain documents and recordkeeping of system
evaluation and condition assessment inspections
and activities.

Continuously X X

216

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 60

8.4. Capital Improvement Plan

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-8.4 (pg. D-9)
“The capital improvement plan must include the following items:
• Project schedules include completion dates for all portions of the capital improvement program; • Internal and external project funding sources for each project; and • Joint coordination between operation and maintenance staff, and engineering staff/consultants during planning, design, and construction of capital improvement projects; and Interagency coordination with other impacted utility agencies.”

COMPLIANCE
The City’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years FY2025-26 through FY2029-30 (Appendix

8.1) lists proposed projects through fiscal year 2029 -2030. Table 7-3 shows that the following funding has been allocated to the “Annual Sewer Line Maintenance & Rehab Program”:

The Project Description in Section 8 states “The Annual Sewer Line Maintenance & Rehabilitation Program consists of completing annual sewer line repairs and rehabilitations in various locations around the City.

Locations are identified several ways: through staff field inspections and through the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District's (FSSD) annual CCTV program, as well as via the City's Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) CIP Plan.”
The City intends to make improvements in three specific areas. These areas were identified based on the District’s CCTV data of the 10” or smaller lines, and from an assessment completed by the District’s consultant, and are shown in Figure 8, below. Approximately one-third of the areas will be completed in FY 25-26. T he City intends to have the project out bid by the end of February 2026 and the work completed during the summer of 2026.

Fiscal Year Funding
FY2025-26 $1,935,000
FY2026-27 $1,300,000
FY2027-28 $1,300,000
FY2028-29 $1,300,000
FY2029-30 $1,300,000
Table 8 –CIP Funding for Sewer Line Maintenance and Rehab 217

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 61

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Has the City’s capital improvement plan schedule been adhered to?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

8.4.1 Hold regular coordination meetings, with all parties, to help keep the projects on track and resolve issues
that may arise in a timely manner.

Annually X X X

8.4.2 For schedules that are not followed, justify and
document the reason.

Each Delayed
Project X x X

8.4.3 For the FY 25-26 CIP, publish bid documents by
March 1, 2026. March 1, 2026 X X X
Figure8 – Suisun City Sewer Rehabilitation Project
218

SYSTEM EVALUATION, CAPACITY ASSURANCE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS © 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 62

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 8 by:
• Is there an annual review of the Capital Improvement Plan by all appropriate individuals including both Engineering and Operations?
APPENDIX 8 INCLUSIONS
• 8.1 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years FY2025-26 through FY2029-30

219

MONITORING, MEASUREMENT, AND PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 63

9. Monitoring, Measurement, and Program Modifications

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-9 (pg. D-9)
“The Plan must include an Adaptive Management section that addresses Plan- implementation effectiveness and the steps for necessary Plan improvement, including:
• Maintaining relevant information, including audit findings, to establish and prioritize appropriate Plan activities;
• Monitoring the implementation and measuring the effectiveness of each Plan element; • Assessing the success of the preventive operation and maintenance activities; • Updating Plan procedures and activities, as appropriate, based on results of monitoring and performance evaluations; and
• Identifying and illustrating spill trends, including spill frequency, locations, and estimated volumes.”

COMPLIANCE
The above requirements are addressed below:

Maintaining Information:

The City maintains accurate and relevant inspection and maintenance records for the collection system , including field data such as pipe cleaning and inspection frequencies, and information regarding spills. Much of the documentation is maintained electronically, which allows for ease of access and analysis. This helps City staff to make sound decisions and prioritize activities when dealing with the routine and the unexpected.

Monitoring SSMP Elements:

Monitoring of the City’s SSMP focuses on each Element in terms of its implementation and effectiveness.

The SSMP has been designed to include key performance indicators for each Element, which are used to measure effectiveness. In addition, implementation responsibilities are included for each Element to help ensure the SSMP is being implemented as intended.

Assessing Preventative Operations:

The City assesses the success of maintenance and operation activities by ensuing activities are being performed as expected, by monitoring actual outcomes compared to intended outcomes, as well as monitoring spill trends.

Updating the SSMP:

The City is committed to continuous improvement and monitors and evaluates performance of work programs and SSMP Elements to ensure intended outcomes are achieved while looking for areas for improvement. Although the SWRCB requires that the SSMP be updated every six years, the SSMP is considered as a dynamic document and may require updating on a more frequent basis. Routine changes to administrative information, notwithstanding, minor changes will likely be required to address improvements identified through the SSMP Audit or through modifications required as conditions change.

220

MONITORING, MEASUREMENT, AND PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 64 Identifying Spill Trends:

The City monitors spill trends, at a minimum every three years during required Audit s, utilizing inspection records, and CIWQS data. These resources are helpful in planning and programing work, and adjusting as needed, enabling the City to be adaptive and capitalize on lessons learned.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Are SSMP Elements being periodically evaluated for effectiveness? • Are work activities and spill events being documented? • Has a plan and schedule been established to address Audit findings/deficiencies from the last Audit? • Is Trend Analysis being performed on spill causes?
• Have work programs been assessed and updated as necessary?

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

9.1 Assess work programs to ensure
outcomes are as intended. Annually X X

9.2 Ensure work programs and the SSMP
are updated based on assessments. As Needed X X

9.3 Monitor and evaluate spill trends;
document efforts. Annually X X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 9 by:
• Development of key performance indicators to measure effectiveness of the SSMP. • Performing periodic reviews of the SSMP to help ensure it is being properly implemented. • Developing and adhering to a timeline to correct deficiencies found during the Audit process. • Periodically evaluating work programs to help ensure effectiveness.

APPENDIX 9 INCLUSIONS:
• None

221

INTERNAL AUDITS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 65

10. Internal Audits

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-10 (pg. D-10)
“The Plan shall include internal audit procedures, appropriate to the size and performance of the system, for the Enrollee to comply with section 5.4 (Sewer System Management Plan Audits) of this General Order.”

COMPLIANCE
The City completed the August 2021 through August 2024 Audit in April 2025 and submitted the document through CIWQS. The Audit states that during this period, there were no sanitary sewer overflows; the City cleaned 11.98 miles of gravity sewer; and a vacuum truck was purchased and received in January 2024. The Audit also states:

To date, the City has not adequate funds to pursue significant capital system improvements. However, the City has worked with the District to receive additional funds specifically designated for system rehabilitation/capital improvements. Capital improvement projects should begin in 2025 and continue thereafter.

In the future, the City will complete Audits every three years following the WDR schedule. The objective of the Audit is to evaluate compliance, implementation and effectiveness of the SSMP. Additionally, the SSMP includes a description of how the City will comply with the requirements of each Element.

The Audit review includes an evaluation to determine if compliance has been met. A list of priority improvement opportunities will be prepared and updated as part of the Audit program. Improvement opportunities will be used to prioritize and develop program modifications and will be initiated based on the priority and the available funding. An overview of SSMP related work completed between Audit s will be included in the program Audits.

Implementation is evaluated by determining if the City is executing the SSMP as stated.

Effectiveness is evaluated by using K ey Performance Indicators, which have been developed specifically for each Element. An additional evaluation is performed to comply with Specifications 5.6 addressing resilience.

Resilience indicators have been developed for each Element. These indicators serve to demonstrate how resilience is built into the SSMP and inspection, maintenance, and spill response activities.

Any deficiencies discovered through the Audit process are noted and a plan and schedule to implement corrective measures are established. All Audit r e p o r t s w i l l b e c e r ti fi e d b y t h e C i t y ’ s L R O . A l l c h a n g e s o r modifications of the SSMP resulting from the Audit shall be listed in the SSMP Change Log.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Have Audits been performed as required?
• Have the Audits assessed compliance, implementation, and effectiveness? • Have deficiencies been identified?
• Has a plan and schedule to rectify the deficiencies been established? 222

INTERNAL AUDITS
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 66

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

10.1 Schedule Audits in advance of due dates to ensure
adequate time to complete. City has 6 months to
complete the Audit from the end of the Audit period.

Beginning at
end of Audit
period
X

10.2 Ensure a plan and schedule is developed to address deficiencies.

As each Audit is
completed X X X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 10 by:
• Periodically evaluating key performance indicators during the Audit period to assess effectiveness and make corrections, if necessary, prior to the Audit.
• Evaluating previous Audits to ensure deficiencies have been rectified. • Scheduling the Audit due dates and completing the Audit on time.

APPENDIX 10 INCLUSIONS:
• None

223

COMMUNICATION PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 67

11. Communication Program

WDR REQUIREMENTS
Attachment D-11 (pg. D-10)
“The Plan must include procedures for the Enrollee to communicate with:
• The public for:
• Spills and discharges resulting in closures of public areas, or that enter a source of drinking water; and
• The development, implementation, and update of its Plan, including opportunities for public input to Plan implementation and updates.
• Owners/operators of systems that connect into the Enrollee’s system, including satellite systems, for:
• System operation, maintenance, and capital improvement-related activities.”

COMPLIANCE
Spills:

When the City experiences a spill, it is standard procedure to secure the affected area and keep the public away. This is generally done using barricades, cones, and caution tape. Should the City experience a spill that may require closure of public areas or enter a source drinking of water, signs similar to that found in Appendix 11.1 will be immediately placed indicating the issue and providing contact information. Staff will remain on site to provide an additional safety factor until appropriate authoriti es respond and direct otherwise. In all cases, the City will follow the advice of higher authorities, such as the local environmental health department and other regulatory authorities.

Public Participation:

There are several opportunities for stakeholders and the public to participate and provide input into the development and update of the City’s SSMP. During its initial development stage, as with each SSMP Audit and update of the SSMP, the SSMP and related documents are presented to the City Council for review and acceptance. Prior to each City Council Meeting, these documents are included in Agenda packet which are readily available for review on the City’s website.

Satellite Systems:

There are no satellite systems that are tributary to the City.

The City of Suisun City, City of Fairfield, and Travis Air Force Base are satellite systems to the Fairfield- Suisun Sewer District. The entities correspond regularly and share resources regarding regional meetings, trainings, spill response, FOG prevention, and SSMP implementation.

EFFECTIVENESS
The City utilizes the following Key Performance Indicators for measuring effectiveness of this Element:
• Does the City place all SSMP action items on the agenda for regular counsel/board meetings? • Does the City have signage, or other means, readily available to notify the public of environmental or public risk factors related to a sewage spill?
• Does the City perform outreach to residential customers? 224

COMMUNICATION PROGRAM
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 68

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN/SCHEDULE
No. Plan Schedule Responsible Party

PWD SUP MA

11.1 Ensure the City Council approves the SSMP per
schedule. Every 6 years X X

11.2 Ensure the SSMP is posted on the City website and the link functions properly. Annually X

11.3 Ensure Sewage Spill Warning signs are readily available to communicate with the public when necessary. Annually X

RESILIENCE
Resilience is addressed in Element 11 by:
• Use the SSMP as a tool to communicate to the public how the City is managing the system. • Maintain a consistent presence in the service area by attending community events or issuing periodic newsletters or other communications to the public.
• Make it clear and easy for the public to contact the City.

APPENDIX 11 INCLUSIONS
• 11.1 Example Sewage Warning Sign

225

APPENDICES
© 2025 Fischer Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved. SSMP licensed for Suisun City use only. Page 69 List of Appendices
APPENDIX 1 • 1.1 Gravity Sewer System Specific Details (size, age)

APPENDIX 2 • None
APPENDIX 3 • None
APPENDIX 4 • 4.1 Spill Response Instructions for Contractors/Contracted Services APPENDIX 5 • 5.1 Relevant sections of the City of Suisun City Design Standards, Standard Specifications, and Details, 1996.

APPENDIX 6 • None
APPENDIX 7 • 7.1 City’s FOG door-hanger
APPENDIX 8 • 8.1 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years FY2025 -26 through FY2029-30
APPENDIX 9 • None
APPENDIX 10 • None
APPENDIX 11 • 11.1 Sewage Warning Sign

226
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

December 16, 2025

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates for Staff Support Services Related to the Processing of Development Applications for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and Determining that the Action is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There would be no fiscal impact on the General Fund. The total cost for retaining Harris & Associates to provide staff support services will be fully borne by the developer/applicant.

Payments to the consultant are only made when funds are deposited by the developer.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Provide Good Governance; Develop Sustainable Economy; Enhance the Environment.

BACKGROUND:

On December 15, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with another firm to serve as staff support for the processing of entitlements and managing of the preparation of a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for the Suisun Logistics Project, located east of Walters between Peterson Road and Highway 12.

The Project has been in process for several years, which has included preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Due to circumstances of processing a Project of this scale, including staffing changes at the city level, the Project has been progressing slower than anticipated. For those reasons, Staff would like to hire a consultant with expertise in project management, environmental review, and urban planning, to more efficiently move the Project forward to completion.

Although the City previously contracted with another consultant for staff support services, City Staff is confident Harris & Associates has the resources to process the entitlements expeditiously.

If approved, Harris & Associates would serve solely as staff in the processing of the entitlements. First Carbon Solutions would continue the work on the CEQA review, separate from Harris & Associates’ role.

STAFF REPORT:

If approved, Staff would work with Harris & Associates to work towards entitlement processing to bring forth the Project for Planning Commission and City Council consideration as expeditiously as possible. Harris & Associates’ scope of work and budget are provided in Attachment 2, Proposal. As shown, the scope of work would include tasks such as:
• Document Review;
• Coordination with Departments and Agencies;
• Project Management;
• Staff Report Preparation;
• Hearing Preparation; and
• Public Hearing Presentation.
227
Hourly rates would range from $175.00 to $290.00 per hour, at applicant/developer’s expense. The initial contract would be up to a total of $50,000 with an option to increase to another $50,000 with City Manager approval, therefore the total contract amount for City Council consideration would be $100,000, of which would be paid exclusively by the Applicant with no City funds expended.

If approved, the city would elect to cancel the contract with the existing consulting firm which is within the parameters of the contract.

Environmental Review
The Development Services Director has determined that the recommended action of approving the contract modification is not a “project” pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 since it does not result in a physical change in the environment.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that staff adopt Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates for Staff Support Services Related to the Processing of Development Applications for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and Determining that the Action is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

1. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates for Staff Support Services Related to the Processing of Development Applications for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and Determining that the Action is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

2. Harris & Associates Proposal

PREPARED BY:

Ricky Caperton, Development Services Director
REVIEWED BY:

Ricky Caperton, AICP, Development Services
Director
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Harris & Associates Proposal
228
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY

AUTHORZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS & ASSOCIATES FOR STAFF SUPPORT

SERVICES RELATED TO THE PROCESSING OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

FOR THE SUISUN LOGISTICS CENTER PROJECT AND DETERMINING THAT

THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT (CEQA)

WHEREAS, a development application has been received for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and requires staff support services for the processing of the application; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is necessary to hire a consulting firm to process the development applications for the Project at the full cost of the Applicant; and WHEREAS, Harris & Associates provided a proposal dated December 2, 2025, included in the December 16, 2025 City Council Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the selected firm (Harris & Associates) has strong project management skills, along with expertise in urban planning and the processing of entitlements, as well as serving as staff support for municipalities; and
WHEREAS, this action is not considered a “project” pursuant to (CEQA) Guidelines §15378 since it does not result in a physical change in the environment.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Suisun City authorizes the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates to provide staff support services related to the processing of development applications for the Suisun Logistics Center Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of said City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:__________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers:__________________________________ ABSENT: Councilmembers:__________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:__________________________________

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of December 2025.

____________________________________
Anita Skinner, CMC
City Clerk

229
2400 Del Paso Road, Suite 210, Sacramento, CA 95834 ◼ p: 916.970.8001 ◼ www.WeAreHarris.com December 2, 2025
Ricky Caperton, AICP
Development Services Director
City of Suisun City
701 Civic Center Boulevard, Suisun City, CA 94585
[email protected]
SUBJECT: Scope and Cost for Planning Staff Support Services Dear Mr. Caperton:

Thank you for inviting Harris & Associates (Harris) to submit a proposal to provide Planning Staff Support Services for the Suisun Logistics Center Project (Project) in the City of Suisun City (City).

Harris will assist the City with document reviews, coordination with departments and agencies, project management, staff report preparation, hearing preparation and public hearing presentation, and other tasks as directed by the City associated with the Project.

The Project includes development of 2.1 million square feet of warehousing uses on approximately 120 acres. The remaining acreage would be open space. The entire 167.43 -acre site would be annexed into the Suisun City limits. The Project would be located east of Walters Road between Petersen Road and Highway 12. Six buildings ranging from 145,397 to 644,782 square feet would be developed on site. Each building would provide docks, grade level roll -up doors, and trailer parking stalls. The facility would be enclosed with a secure perimeter and access would be restricted to authorized users.

Harris understands the City would like Amy to attend the Planning Commission and City Council hearings onsite and in person, with the remainder of her work p erformed remotely. However, Harris can be available for in-person meetings with advance notice. Harris will work with the applicant, stakeholders, First Carbon Solutions (CEQA consultant), and City staff to complete the project for a hearing.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

SCOPE OF SERVICES
ATTACHMENT 2
230
2 For purposes of this cost estimate, hourly rates for Amy and the remainder of the Harris team have been provided. It is anticipated that Amy (Project Manager) will perform the majority of the staff support services, however additional support may be provided by Delanie Garlick (Principal Planner), David Mack (Planning Manager); and/or Darin Neufeld (Planning Director). All work completed would be billed as time and materials.

Please feel free to contact me with questions about this proposal.

Sincerely,
Harris & Associates, Inc.

Darin Neufeld, AICP
Director, Environmental Planning + Compliance
(619) 200-9137 ◼ [email protected]
Enclosures: EPC- Planning Hourly Rates
Team Resumes
ATTACHMENT 2
231

STANDARD HOURLY BILLING RATES
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING CONSULTING STAFF
Effective January 1 - December 31, 2026
Staff Title Hourly Billing Rate
Directors, Senior Directors, Vice Presidents
Darin Neufeld Director $290
Project Managers, Senior Staff
David Mack Senior Project Manager/Planning Manager $235 Delanie Garlick Principal Planner $225
Project Analysts
Amy Rossig Senior Associate Planner $175
ENVIRONMENTAL + CONSULTING SERVICES HOURLY RATE
Directors, Senior Directors, Vice Presidents $250-395
Environmental Counsel (Licensed Attorney) $450
Project Managers, Senior Staff $165-265
Project Analysts $95-195
Technical and Administrative Support $85-185
Notes:

Rates are subject to adjustment due to promotions during the effective period of this schedule. A new rate schedule will become effective January 1st of every year.

Annual rate escalation tied to the Consumer Price Index or 4%, whichever is higher, shall be included for multi-year contracts and projects.

When applicable, the following charges will be added to projects:
• Production
o Black & white printing $0.02/page (8.5x11) and $0.03/page (11x17) o Color printing will be $0.06/page (8.5x11) and $0.08/page (11x17) • Data-Gathering Tools
o Harris Drone, GPS Unit, Noise Meter – $100/day or add $12.50/hour to billing rate • Vehicles and Mileage
o Harris Vehicle – $75/day
o Personal Vehicle – Mileage will be charged at the current IRS rate • All subconsultant charges and other direct costs are subject to a 10% markup ATTACHMENT 2
232
Harris & Associates, Inc.
 ii

EDUCATION
BA, Public & Urban Affairs
Amy Rossig

SENIOR ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Amy brings over six years of experience in current planning within the public sector and more than four years of experience in affordable housing. Her planning background includes permit compliance and review, as well as the analysis, preparation, and evaluation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, including Negative Declarations (NDs) and Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs). In the affordable housing sector, Amy has significant experience in project management, guiding projects through the financial processes of tax credits and bond financing.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• County of San Bernardino , Land Use Services Department. Contract Planner. Harris assists the County with processing current planning applications and peer review of project-related environmental documents. Projects range in complexity from pre-application reviews to Major Conditional Use Permits heard before the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.

As a Planner IV, Amy has managed and assisted with pre-application reviews, discretionary application reviews, internal project routing, inter-agency briefings, project scoping meetings, technical analysis of housing-related projects, staff report preparation and review, and public hearing presentations. She has also coordinated with local, state, and federal agencies. Amy has consistently supported the timely and budget-conscious review of environmental documents and discretionary permit applications.
• City of Benicia, General Planning. Planner. Assisted the department with public counter customer service and zoning inquiries. Reviewed building permits for compliance with planning requirements such as setbacks, coverage, height, floor-area ratio, and landscaping. Contributed to implementation of the Downtown Mixed Use Master Plan, a form-based code aligned with the City’s central vision.
• Placer County, Zoning Code Update. Planner. Updated the Reasonable Accommodations section of the Zoning Ordinance to align with the Housing Element. Changes included removal of notification requirements and findings related to surrounding impacts, and coordination with the Placer Airport Land Use Commission for consistency findings. • Placer County, Design Review. Planner. Managed design review for commercial projects, including fast-food chains like Chick-fil-A and KFC, in areas with strict design standards.

Reviewed residential projects within a Specific Plan area to ensure compliance with local guidelines.
• Placer County, Conditional Use Permit. Planner. Managed review of a proposed development of 57 tiny vacation rental cabins in Foresthill, CA, within a high fire severity zone. The project faced public opposition due to fire safety concerns and single-road access. Responsibilities included coordination and preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). • Placer County, Setback Variance and Appeal. Planner. Reviewed a proposal to reduce side setback requirements on a 20-acre parcel to permit unpermitted structures. Findings to support the project could not be made, leading to an appeal from the Zoning Administrator to the Planning Commission and subsequently to the Board of Supervisors. The project was exempt from CEQA as it could not be approved.
• City of Benicia, Historic Preservation and Design Review. Planner. Handled historic preservation and design review projects including additions to non-contributing homes, window remodels, roof replacements, and structure restorations. Ensured compliance with local design standards and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation and Restoration.

ATTACHMENT 2
233
Harris & Associates, Inc.
 i

EDUCATION
MS, Geography
BA, Geography
Delanie Garlick

PRINCIPAL PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER
Delanie is an accomplished planner with extensive experience in city planning and development, particularly in rewriting zoning codes and implementing policies to promote affordable and sustainable housing. She has led teams through significant changes, including the adoption of new procedures and engagement with various stakeholders. Prior to joining Harris, Delanie worked in-house as an Associate Planner for Placer County and as a Development Services Manager for the City of Boise. She has a strong background in land use analysis, environmental compliance, and project management, with a proven ability to navigate complex planning entitlements and work directly with developers on large-scale projects. Her career has also included roles in environmental protection, community outreach, and GIS analysis.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Willows, On-Call Planning Staff Support. Planner. Harris is providing ongoing on-call planning staff support to the City of Willows, offering expertise in both short- and long-range planning, zoning, and residential and commercial development review. Serving as an extension of City staff, Harris delivers professional planning services and technical assistance to support day-to-day operations, guide applicants through the entitlement and CEQA processes, and ensure compliance with local and state regulations. With a strong emphasis on responsiveness and customer service, Harris helps the City maintain consistent, high-quality planning services while advancing community goals and regulatory clarity.
• County of San Bernardino , Land Use Services Department. Contract Planner. Harris assists the County with the processing of current planning applications and the peer review of project- related environmental documents. Harris has been assigned projects ranging in complexity from pre-application reviews to Major Conditional Use Permits being heard before the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Delanie has managed and assisted with pre-application review, discretionary application review, internal project routing, inter-agency project briefings, project scoping meetings, technical analysis of housing-related projects, staff report preparation and review, and public hearing presentations. She has also assisted in coordination with responsible local, state, and federal agencies. Delanie has been part of a team that has reviewed and/or processed environmental review documents and discretionary permit applications in a timely manner and within budget.
• City of Boise, Various Projects. Senior Planner. In this role, Delanie reviewed, assessed, and analyzed development projects for compliance with the Boise City Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, and State of Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA). She prepared detailed reports and presented recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council on the most complex planning entitlements. Additionally, she served as a liaison to associated agencies and communities impacted by proposed developments. She participated in construction plan reviews and conducted final occupancy inspections to ensure compliance with required conditions of approval. Delanie performed professional-level planning work involving research, analysis, and technical assistance on major projects. She also assisted in training and onboarding new team members and supported the Planning and Zoning Manager. • Placer County, Community Development Resource Agency. Associate Planner. Delanie performed professional planning duties related to land use, environmental protection, economic development, environmental compliance, and more. She administered applicable local ordinances and state and federal statutes, assisting the public with understanding and complying with regulations. She made CEQA and NEPA determinations and provided guidance on environmental review processes.

Recognized for exceptional customer service, Delanie processed permits efficiently and engaged in public outreach. She coordinated with other departments and agencies, met regularly with applicants, and maintained project communication. She also prepared staff reports and delivered presentations of findings and recommendations to public hearing bodies.

ATTACHMENT 2
234
Harris & Associates, Inc.

EDUCATION
BA, Environmental Studies

CERTIFICATIONS/

LICENSES
Certified Planner, American
Institute of Certified Planners

AFFILIATIONS
Association of
Environmental Professionals
(AEP), Member at Large on
the AEP Board
American Public Works
Association (APWA)
• County of San Bernardino , CEQA and Planning Support Services. Project Manager. Harris has provided planning support services/staff augmentation to the County since late 2023. In this role, Harris staff have served as an extension of County staff relative to the processing of Discretionary Permits, Development Pre-Applications, and associated CEQA documents.

Harris is responsible for application review, compliance determination with applicable general plan, zoning code, and individual land use and area plans. • City of Willows, On-Call Planning Staff Support. Project Manager. Harris provides ongoing on-call planning staff support to the City, offering expertise in both short- and long-range planning, zoning, and residential and commercial development review. Serving as an extension of City staff, Harris delivers professional planning services and technical assistance to support day-to-day operations, guide applicants through the entitlement and CEQA processes, and verify compliance with local and state regulations.
• County of Monterey, Housing and Community Development, Staff Augmentation/Support Services. Contract Planner/Project Manager. Harris assists the County with the processing of current planning applications and the preparation of project related environmental documents.

Harris has completed projects ranging in complexity from administrative permits to conditional use permits being heard by the zoning administrator, Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors. As project manager, David managed and completed project assignments from Monterey County, involving project file review; CEQA consistency determinations; CEQA document preparation, including NDs, MNDs, and EIRs; staff report preparation; and public hearing presentations (upon request). David and his staff worked with Monterey County employees to produce environmental review documents and staff reports in a timely manner and below budget for the last year and a half.
• County of Humboldt, Planning Support Services/Staff Augmentation. Project Manager.

The Harris planning team provided planning support and staff augmentation services to the County of Humboldt from late 2020 to early 2023. Under David’s leadership, Harris assisted the County with planning and environmental compliance services, including cannabis discretionary permit applications, current planning applications, management of environmental review processes, and preparation and completion of third-party review of CEQA documentation. Harris delivered detailed, concise, and complete staff reports and conducted public presentations for Humboldt County for two years. During that time, decision makers with Humboldt County positively commented on the quality of work delivered. • City of San Juan Bautista, Planning Support Services/Staff Augmentation. City Planner (Contract). Harris has provided planning support/staff augmentation services to the City of David Mack, AICP

SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER/PLANNING MANAGER
David has more than 19 years of experience in community development and environmental planning. His planning experience includes facilitating planning permit compliance and review; analyzing, preparing, and reviewing CEQA documents, including negative declarations (NDs), mitigated negative declarations (MNDs), and environmental impact reports (EIRs); and processing and reviewing proposed development projects, including general plan amendments, specific plans, and rezoning requests. David communicates with the public with clarity and proficiency and is a skilled and effective presenter. Work completed by David is concise, well scripted, and allows decision-makers and public members to understand the projects and potential issues/impacts clearly. David completes projects on time and within budget.

RELEVANT E

XPERIENCE
ATTACHMENT 2
235
Harris & Associates, Inc.

Darin Neufeld, AICP
DIRECTOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING + COMPLIANCE
Da
rin has 18 years of experience in environmental planning and project management, eight of those working for lead agencies. He specializes in CEQA compliance. He has experience with master-planned communities, commercial/retail, industrial, renewable energy, climate action planning, and long-range planning projects. Darin has managed complex and controversial projects including general plan amendments, community plans, climate action plans, and large-scale renewable energy projects. For six years, Darin managed the CEQA process for the County of San Diego Planning & Development Services Department. He oversaw the review and production of CEQA documents while managing 32 staff in his role as Chief, Departmental Operations.

SELECT EXPERIENCE
• City of Walnut Creek, Planning Services. Project Manager. Harris provides contract planning services to the City of Walnut Creek’s Community Development Department, offering expert support across a range of planning functions including land development permitting, zoning, land use policy, environmental review, sustainability, and transportation planning. Harris staff also provided as-needed expertise in air quality, biological and cultural resources, greenhouse gas analysis, noise, and GIS mapping. Darin Neufeld served as the City’s Consulting Senior Planner, presenting to both the Planning Commission and City Council in support of the project’s successful approval.
• County of San Diego PDS, As-Needed PDS Staff Support Services. Project Manager. Darin is managing contract staff support services related to CEQA to support the PDS Project Planning Division. Darin authors and reviews Exemptions, 15183 Checklists, Initial Studies, NDs/ MNDs, and EIRs. He provides expert senior-level review and coordinates with County staff and County Counsel on project issues.
• County of San Diego PDS, Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) Services. Project Manager. Darin provides professional services related to climate change and GHGs on a temporary basis to support the County’s preparation of the CAP Update and CAP Update SEIR. Specifically, these services are provided to support the County as it remedies the issues affirmed in the Appellate Court decision. • County of San Bernardino , CEQA and Planning Support Services. Principal-in-Charge.

Harris has provided planning support services/staff augmentation to the County since late 2023. In this role, Harris staff have served as an extension of County staff relative to the processing of Discretionary Permits, Development Pre-Applications, and associated CEQA documents. Harris is responsible for application review, compliance determination with applicable general plan, zoning code, and individual land use and area plans. Darin oversees this effort and provides CEQA technical advice and CEQA reviews for the County. • City of Napa, Napa Glamping Campground. Principal-in-Charge. Harris completed entitlement support and an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City of Napa. Darin assisted the City with responses to community and legal comments and with preparation and attendance at a City Council hearing.

EDUCATION
MA, Urban History
BA, History

CERTIFICATIONS/

LICENSES
Certified Planner, American
Institute of Certified Planners

RECENT SPEAKING

ENGAGEMENTS
Darin Neufeld presented
at the 2025 Association of
Environmental Professionals
State Conference on CEQA
Guidelines 15183 and a
recent CEQA case called
Hilltop v. County of San
Diego. Darin worked on the
Hilltop project while Chief
of Departmental Operations
for the County of San Diego
Planning & Development
Services Department.

ATTACHMENT 2
236
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

December 16, 2025

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Fourth Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with First Carbon Solutions for Continued Services Preparing an Environmental Impact Report for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and Determining that the Action is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Due to this budget amendment, there would be no fiscal impact on the General Fund. The total cost for retaining First Carbon Solutions (FCS) to prepare and complete an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be fully borne by the developer/applicant. Payments to the consultant are only made when funds are deposited by the developer.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Provide Good Governance; Develop Sustainable Economy; Enhance the Environment.

BACKGROUND:

On December 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-155 authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with environmental consulting firm First Carbon Solution (FCS) to complete a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for the Suisun Logistics Project totaling $268,729, located east of Walters between Peterson Road and Highway 12.

Following execution of the original contract in 2020, three (3) additional contract modifications have been approved to allow environmental evaluation to continue, bringing the total contract amount to $399,109 to date, as shown below:
• Original Contract (Resolution No. 2020-155) $268,729 • 1st Contract Modification (City Manager Approval) $24,590 (total $293,319) • 2nd Contract Modification (Resolution No. 2022-160) $33,000 (total $326,319) • 3rd Contract Modification (Resolution No. 2024-50) $72,790 (total $399,109) • Total Contract Amount to Date: $399,109
The Public Review Draft EIR was released in July 2024 for the CEQA-required 45-day public comment period. Following receipt of public comment, FCS is requesting additional funds to prepare and recirculate portions of the Draft EIR as a result of comments received during the public review period.

In addition, the additional amount is needed to prepare the Final EIR, which would include response to public comments received.

STAFF REPORT:

Since the initial contract approval, the Applicant and consultant have been working with staff to complete the required environmental review. Work to date has included evaluating various project elements such as air quality, traffic, and biological conditions in anticipation of the release of a DEIR to the public for review and comment.

After assessing the remaining tasks and following the public review period of the Draft EIR in 2024, FCS is seeking an additional $196,830.00 to augment the budget to ensure adequate funding is available 237
for preparation of portions of the Draft EIR and preparation of the Final EIR and responding to comments received during public review.

If approved, the recommended budget augmentation of $196,830, which increases the total contract to $595,939. Again, this cost is fully borne by the Applicant, and no general funds are used for preparation of the environmental analysis.

Environmental Review
The Development Services Director has determined that the recommended action of approving the contract modification is not a “project” pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 since it does not result in a physical change in the environment.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a fourth amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with First Carbon Solutions to continue preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Suisun Logistics Center Project.

PREPARED BY:

Ricky Caperton, Development Services Director
REVIEWED BY:

Ricky Caperton, AICP, Development Services
Director
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution FCS Contract Modification No. 4 Suisun Logistics ATCH 1

2. FCS Contract Modification No. 4 Suisun Logistics ATCH 2 .
238
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY

AUTHORZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO

A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FIRST CARBON SOLUTIONS

FOR CONTINUED SERVICES PREPARING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT FOR THE SUISUN LOGISTICS CENTER PROJECT AND DETERMINING

THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT (CEQA)

WHEREAS, a development application has been received for the Suisun Logistics Center Project and requires environmental review consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is necessary to hire a consulting firm to complete the environment document for the Project at the full cost of the Applicant; and WHEREAS, the City solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) from environmental firms to complete the work and received six proposals in 2020, and selected First Carbon Solutions; and

WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with First Carbon Solutions at their December 15, 2020, meeting in the amount of $268,729; and

WHEREAS, on March 28, 2022, the City Manager authorized the first amendment to the contract to include additional scope of work and budget in the amount of $24,590, increasing the total budget to $293,319, related to tasks for preparation of a Cultural Resources Assessment – Section 106 analysis; and

WHEREAS, on December 22, 2022, the City Council authorized the second amendment to the contract to include additional scope of work and budget in the amount of $33,000, increasing the total budget to $326,319, related to tasks for preparation of additional biological resources analysis and for anticipated responding to public comments on the Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to increase the scope of work and budget in the amount of $196,830 to complete the environmental analysis related to tasks for recirculating a portion of the Environmental Impact Report and respond to comments for preparation of a Final Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, this action is not considered a “project” pursuant to (CEQA) Guidelines §15378 since it does not result in a physical change in the environment.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Suisun City authorizes the City Manager to execute a fourth amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with First Carbon Solutions for $196,830, increasing the total amount of the agreement to $595,939, for continued services preparing an Environmental Impact Report for the Suisun Logistics Center Project.

239
ATTACHMENT 1
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of said City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:__________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers:__________________________________ ABSENT: Councilmembers:__________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:__________________________________

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of December 2025.

____________________________________
Anita Skinner, CMC
City Clerk

240
Southern California
250 Commerce, Suite 210
Irvine, CA 92602
Northern California
2999 Oak Road, Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Phone +1 888 826 5814
+1 714 508 4100
Fax +1 714 508 4110
Email [email protected]
firstcarbonsolutions.com
June 18, 2025
Jim Bermudez, Director
Development Services
City of Suisun City
701 Civic Center Blvd.

Suisun City, CA 94585
Subject: Proposed to Prepare a Recirculated Environmental Impact Report and Final EIR Responses to
Comments, and Findings of Fact for the Suisun
Logistics Project
Dear Jim:

FCS International, Inc., doing business as FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS) is pleased to submit this augment request to cover recirculation of portions of the Draft EIR, as well as preparation of responses to comments, findings of fact, and attendance at team meetings and public hearings.

We are committed to responding to project needs in a timely and cost-effective manner. Should you have any questions regarding this Scope of Work (Scope), please contact me at 415-713-5223 or [email protected].

We look forward to continuing our successful working relationship with you on this important project.

Sincerely,
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mar
y Bean, Senior Vice President, Environmental Services
ATTACHMENT 2
241
1 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
Project Understanding
FCS understands that the City proposes to recirculate portions of the Draft EIR to address specific comments received during the public comment period that occurred in August and September 2024. The key areas for recirculation include but are not limited to the following:
• The project description will be recirculated to clarify statements related to development standards , as well as the concurrent annexation to Solano Irrigation District (SID), Solano- Suisun Water Association (SSWA), Fairfield Suisun Sewer District (FSSD), and detachments from the Suisun Fire Protection District (SFPD) and the County Service Area. • The greenhouse gases section will be recirculated in its entirety . • Portions of the land use section will be recirculated to clarify statements related to development standards as well as the concurrent annexation described above . • Portions of the utilities section will be recirculated to provide clarifying information related to Water Supply in light of climate change, as analyzed by the Department of Water Resources (DWR).

Supporting information will be appended .

The Recirculated Draft EIR will explain that certain comments received during the 45- day public review period for the Draft EIR that circulated between July 26 and September 9, 2024, that relate to information and analysis that is now proposed for recirculation are effectively void, and the reader is encouraged to submit new comments , if needed.

During the public review period for the recirculated portions of the Draft EIR, FCS will continue to draft responses to comments received on the 2024 Draft EIR that are not affected by the recirculation. Once the comment period for the Recirculated Draft EIR is complete, FCS will evaluate the comments received, together with the City, and will prepare responses to all new comments received.

The Final EIR will include responses to the comments received on the original Draft EIR, as well as responses to comments received related to the recirculated portions of the Draft EIR.

Scope of Work
Task 1: Prepare Recirculated Draft EIR
Task 1a: Prepare Selected portions of the Draft EIR for Recirculation FCS will prepare portions of the Draft EIR for recirculation • Introduction: the Introduction will explain the purpose for the recirculation and will clarify the disposition of comments submitted previously vis a vis the information included in the Recirculated Draft EIR.
• Project Description:

ATTACHMENT 2
242
2 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
o A new subsection 2.2.13 Development Standards will generally describe the proposed development standards, and will refer the reader to a n ew Appendix N, where a copy of the complete development standards can be found.
o Section 2.4.1 Discretionary and Ministerial Actions will be updated with clarifying information regarding concurrent annexation to Solano Irrigation District (SID), Solano- Suisun Water Association (SSWA), Fairfield Suisun Sewer District (FSSD), and detachments from the Suisun Fire Protection District (SFPD) and the County Service Area • Greenhouse Gas Emissions: This section will be recirculated in its entirety to provide updated information related to the approach, methodology, analysis, and conclusions . • Land Use: Portions of the land use section will be recirculated to clarify statements related to development standards and annexation of the project site into the City. • Utilities: Portions of the utilities section will be recirculated to provide clarifying information related to Water Supply in light of climate change. The section will also refer the reader to Appendix M , which will include the following new information from the Department of Water R esources:
o The Draft State Water Project Delivery Capability Report 2023 (May 2024) o Risk-Informed Future Climate Scenario Development for the State Water Project Delivery Capability Report (December 2023)
o Evaluation and Adjustment of Historical Hydroclimate Data (December 2023) Task 1b: Revise Administrative Draft Recirculated EIR in response to City comments FCS will revise the Administrative Draft information in response to one set of consolidated comments from the City.

Task 1c: Prepare Recirculated Draft EIR for Publication Upon completion of revisions, FCS will prepare the Public Review Recirculated Draft EIR, including preparing the Notice of Completion and uploading to document to the State Clearinghouse CEQANet website.  Electronic copies (via SharePoint in Microsoft Word and PDF) of the Recirculated Draft EIR Task 2: Responses to comments submitted on the 2024 Draft EIR FCS will prepare responses to all comments submitted during the July 26 to September 9, 2024 public review period for the original Draft EIR. Responses will include reference to the recirculated portions of the Draft EIR and whether a comment is effectively void as a result of the provision of new or clarifying information in the Recirculated Draft EIR.

FCS has already prepared many draft responses; for instance, the responses to comments related to biological resources have already been drafted and submitted to the City for review. These include responses to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife letter, and specific comments contained in several other letters .

ATTACHMENT 2
243
3 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
Task 3: Prepare Final EIR including RTC from original EIR and RTC from comments submitted on Recirculated Draft EIR
Subtask 3.1: Administrative Final EIR
FCS will prepare an Administrative Final EIR in accordance with the applicable requirements contained in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15088 and 15089. The Administrative Final EIR will list all agencies, organizations, and individuals who submitted written comments on the Public Draft EIR during the public review period and provide written responses to those comments. To enhance readability and avoid redundancy, FCS will use Master Responses to address frequent and reoccurring comments on the Draft EIR’s analysis. Additionally, the Administrative Final EIR will contain an Errata, which will document minor changes to the Public Draft EIR text in strikeout-underline format.

FCS representatives will attend a public comment session concerning the Public Draft EIR during the public review period. FCS will summarize verbal comments received at the meeting in the Administrative Final EIR and provide written responses to said comments.

Based on FCS’s experience responding to comments on the prior EIR, we have budgeted 220 hours of FCS staff time (including technical, editing, and administrative personnel) for this task. Together with the City, FCS will evaluate the volume and complexity of comments received on the Public Draft EIR. If additional time is required beyond what is budgeted, FCS will prepare a budget augment to cover the actual level of effort.

DELIVERABLE :
 Electronic copy (via SharePoint in Microsoft Word) of the Administrative Final EIR.

Subtask 3.2: Screencheck Final EIR
FCS will respond to comments on the Administrative Final EIR. It is assumed that the FCS will address one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the Administrative Final EIR. Upon receipt of the consolidated set of comments, FCS will prepare the Screencheck Final EIR. The intent of the Screencheck Final EIR is to allow City staff to review final changes to the Final EIR prior to publication. It is anticipated that any comments on the Screencheck Final EIR would concern minor points and not require major revisions. FCS can provide a track change version in PDF of the Screencheck Final EIR for reference upon request.

DELIVERABLE:
 Electronic copy (via SharePoint in Microsoft Word format) of the Screencheck Final EIR.

Subtask 3.3: Final EIR
It is assumed that FCS will address one set of consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the Screencheck Final EIR. Once City staff provides final comments on the Screencheck ATTACHMENT 2
244
4 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
Final EIR, FCS will proceed with finalizing and producing the Final EIR. This task assumes technical staff time will be required to complete revisions to the Final EIR, plus editing and administrative staff time to prepare the document for publication, including compliance with ADA requirements. If additional hours are required, we will prepare a budget augment to cover the actual level of effort.

FCS will provide copies of the Final EIR to the City, who will be responsible for local distribution, noticing, and posting. This Scope assumes that City staff will prepare and mail all notices associated with the Final EIR to local agencies and interested parties.

Task 4: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
FCS will prepare a comprehensive MMRP, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097. The MMRP will contain all mitigation measures identified in the EIR. This comprehensive MMRP will provide City staff with a single source of reference to the full range of mitigation measures to be implemented. For each measure or group of similar measures, the agency responsible for ensuring proper implementation will be identified, along with the timing and method of verification. The MMRP will be included in the Final EIR submittal.

Once FCS receives consolidated, vetted comments (with tracked changes in the Word document) on the MMRP, FCS will complete revisions and provide the City with a final MMRP.

DELIVERABLE S :
 Electronic copy (via SharePoint in Microsoft Word) of the draft MMRP.  Electronic copy (via SharePoint in PDF) of the final MMRP .

Task 5: Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093, FCS will prepare draft Findings of Fact for each potentially significant effect identified in the EIR and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for any unavoidable significant impacts associated with the proposed project. As required by the CEQA Guidelines, one of three findings must be made for each significant effect and must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The Statement of Overriding Considerations will rely on input from the project team regarding the benefits of the project. FCS’s Project Manager will consult with the City to review draft findings and to finalize the findings.

Task 6: Public Hearings
FCS will attend up to 3 public hearings, assumed to include one Planning Commission and two city council hearings. A budget of 6 hours per meeting is assumed.

Upon a final decision by the City Council, FCS will also prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) for the project, which the City will file, within five business days of EIR certification.

Task 7: Team Meetings
FCS will continue to attend Team meetings on a bi-weekly basis. This task assumes attendance at up to 10 additional meetings, covering the period of July through November.

ATTACHMENT 2
245
5 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
Task 8: Management
FCS will perform a variety of project management duties to ensure that the EIR meets the City’s standards of quality, and that it is delivered on time and within budget. These duties will include team supervision and coordination, oral and written communications with City staff, project accounting, and quality assurance review by FCS’s Project Director and Technical Editor of all deliverable products. This task assumes 100 hours of staff time for project management.

DELIVERABLES :
 Electronic copy (via SharePoint in Microsoft Word) of the draft Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations.
 Electronic copy (via SharePoint in PDF) of the final Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations.

Task 9: Electronic Copy of Records
FCS will compile an electronic copy of non-confidential records utilized by FCS supporting the preparation of the EIR. The copy of records will consist of the documents, either in whole or in relevant part, that are cited in the preparation of the EIR, including background material, websites, and correspondence. This copy of records is limited to those documents identified in either the text or footnotes of the Public Draft EIR only. This copy of records will not include internal communications or any preliminary draft or working documents.

Tasks Outside the Scope of Work
The following are tasks FCS has identified as falling outside its Scope for the proposed project.

Newspaper Noticing/Local Noticing
FCS assumes that City staff will be responsible for any public noticing related to the certification of the EIR.

Notice of Determination Filing/Payment of Fees
FCS assumes that the applicant or City staff will be responsible for filing the NOD with the Solano County Clerk’s Office within five business days of certification of the EIR. Please be advised that as of January 1, 2025, the filing fees for an EIR are $4,123.50 (CDFW fee) plus a $50 County handling fee, for a grand total of $4,172.50. The applicant will be responsible for paying the associated filing fees.

Schedule
FCS has prepared the following schedule, assuming a start date of June 23.

Task Week Date
Task 1 Prepare Recirculated Draft EIR
ATTACHMENT 2
246
6 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
Task Week Date
Subtask 1.1: Administrative Draft EIR 4 7/18/25
– Receive comments on Admin Draft EIR 6 8/1/25
Subtask 1.2: Prepare Screencheck DEIR 9 8/22/25
– Receive comments on Screencheck Draft EIR 11 9/5/25
Subtask 1.3: Publish Public Draft EIR 12 9/12/25
– Begin 45-day Public Review Period 12 9/12/25
– 45-day Public Comment Period Ends 18 10/27/25
Task 2 Draft Responses to Comments on 2024 Draft EIR 12 – 18 Task 3 and 4 Prepare Final EIR and MMRP
– Meet with City to review comments received 19 11/3/25 – Submit Administrative Final EIR1 23 12/1/25
– Receive Comments on Administrative Final EIR 27 12/29/25 – Submit Screencheck Final EIR and Draft MMRP 30 1/16/2026 – Receive Comments on Screencheck Final EIR 33 2/6/2026 – Submit Final EIR and Final MMRP 35 2/20/2026
Task 5 Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Considerations
– Submit draft Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 30 1/16/2026
– Receive Comments on Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 33 2/6/2026
– Submit Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Considerations 35 2/20/2026
Task 6 Public Hearings and Notice of Determination
– Planning Commission Meeting Ma rch
– City Council Meeting #1 Ap ril
– City Council Meeting #2 May
ATTACHMENT 2
247
7 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
Task Week Date
– File NOD with Alameda County Clerk (within five business days of EIR certification) May
Task 7 and 8 Team Meetings and Management Ong oing
Note:
1 Depending on volume and complexity of comments received Proposed Budget
FCS has prepared the following budget identifying the costs of each task.

Task Fees
Task 1 Prepare Recirculated Draft EIR $26,670
Task 2 Draft Responses to Comments on the 2024 Draft EIR $30,950 Task 3 Prepare Final EIR
- Administrative Final EIR $45,800
- Screencheck Final EIR $23,020
- Final EIR $14,360
Task 4 Prepare MMRP $2,070
Task 5 Prepare Findings of Fact and SOC $11,270
Task 6 Attend Team Meetings $14,400
Task 7 Attend Public Hearings $14,600
Task 8 Management and Coordination $6,200
Task 9 Electronic Copy of Records $3,490
Total FCS Professional Labor $192,830
Direct Costs
Reprographics, Mileage, Deliveries, etc. $4,000
Total FCS Professional Fee $196,830
ATTACHMENT 2
248
8 Environmental Impact Report for the
Suisun Logistics Project
City of Suisun City
Assumptions
The assumptions used in calculating the above fees are:
 Reimbursable expenses have been included in the table above. These direct costs, including, but not limited to those items presented below, will be reimbursable upon provision of proper documentation:
 Purchases of project materials
 Reproduction, reprographics, document production, printing and photographic  Postage, messenger, delivery, and overnight mailing
 Mileage, noticing, and record searches
 Other miscellaneous costs directly related to the project  There will be no significant revisions to the submitted development application. If there is a change in the project description by the applicant, a budget adjustment will be required to account for the project revisions.
 This price is based on completion of the work within the proposed schedule. If delays occur, an amendment of the price would be warranted to accommodate additional project management and other costs and to reflect adjustments for updated billing rates.  The fee is valid for up to 30 days from the date of this Scope, after which it may be subject to revision.  Costs have been allocated to tasks based upon FCS’s proposed approach. During the work, FCS may, on its sole authority, re-allocate costs among tasks and/or direct costs, as circumstances warrant, so long as the adjustments maintain the total price within its authorized amount.  The FCS Project Manager will be the primary representative at the project meeting and public hearing.

ATTACHMENT 2
249

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
250
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

December 16, 2025

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-___: Approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement of Real Property Between the City of Suisun City and TC Property Management, LTD, and Determining that the Action is Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT:

The sale of the property to adjacent ownership group would result in rehabilitation of a structure in need of repair, while providing long-term upkeep in addition to absolving the City from expending resources to maintain and insure the former senior center building. Further, the sale of the property would go into the City’s General Fund, with a small contribution to the City’s Public Art Fund.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Provide Good Governance; Develop Sustainable Economy; Enhance the Environment.

BACKGROUND:

On June 24, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-63 declaring the subject property (318 Merganser Drive / APN: 0173-010-230) as Surplus Land pursuant to the Surplus Land Act (SLA). The SLA process is intended to allow the government to sale property that is no longer deemed useful. The subject property is shown in
Attachment 2, Property Location.

The subject property formerly served as the City’s Senior Center until 2020 when it closed because of rising costs to update, maintain, and retrofit for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines, in addition to COVID-19 and reduced programming, led to the decline of patronage, eventually leading to closing its doors. However, the Joseph Nelson Community Center began hosting senior programs in 2022, in addition to the Ray and Joan Kroc Center providing other senior-related programs and resources.

Since its closing, the subject property has been deteriorating, and costs have increased to maintain and continually insure the property.

STAFF REPORT:

Because of the subject property’s adjacency to existing senior housing (Casa de Suisun), who happens to also own the property where the subject property’s parking spaces are, the potential buyer, Ted Caldwell (owner of Casa de Suisun), has expressed interest in offering fair market value for the property. An appraisal was completed in 2023, included as Attachment 3, Appraisal.

As
shown on page 39 of the appraisal, the market value was identified as $250,000.00.

The proposed Purchase and Sale Agreement (
Attachment 4, Purchase and Sale Agreement
) between
the City of Suisun City and TC Property Management, LTD, provides for the sale of the subject property for $250,000 in addition to a $25,000 contribution to the City’s Public Art Fund. Other key components of the Purchase and Sale Agreement include:

• Between six (6) and nine (9) deed-restricted senior housing units will be constructed on the property to ensure the secured housing for seniors for the foreseeable future; • The buyer would have six (6) months from the time of executing of the Purchase and Sale 251
Agreement to submit for entitlements and/or permits to construct the senior units at the full cost of the buyer; and
• The buyer will commit to working in good faith with the City on collaboration and partnership in ways to enhance senior resources and promote aging in place.

Collectively, the Purchase and Sale of the subject property to buyer would make the most sense given the constraints of the property to otherwise develop. Its adjacency to an existing senior living complex would ensure additional senior housing is constructed with minimal effort. Additionally, the proposed buyer also has ownership of the parking for the subject property and therefore would seamlessly integrate to their existing facility. Lastly, the added benefit of an additional $25,000 contribution the City’s Public Art Fund beyond appraised value is a commitment to the community.

Environmental Review
Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15312 (Class 12:

Surplus Government Property Sales), the purchase and sale would be exempt from further environmental review.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-___:

Approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement of Real Property Between the City of Suisun City and TC Property Management, LTD, and determining that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

PREPARED BY:

Ricky Caperton, Development Services Director
REVIEWED BY:

Ricky Caperton, AICP, Development Services
Director
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 318 Merganser Drive PSA ATCH 1 CC RESO No. 2025-XX.pdf

2. 318 Merganser Drive PSA ATCH 2 Property Location.pdf

3. 318 Merganser Drive PSA ATCH 3 Appraisal.pdf

4. 318 Merganser Drive PSA ATCH 4 Purchase and Sale Agreement (DRAFT).pdf .
252
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY

APPROVING A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY AND TC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,

LTD, AND DETERMINING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)

WHEREAS, the City of Suisun City owns certain real property in the City of Suisun City (City), County of Solano, State of California, located at 318 Merganser Drive (APN: 0173- 010- 230) (Property); and
WHEREAS, the Property is comprised of approximately 0.32- acres of land and an approximately 5,275 square-foot existing building formerly used as the City’s Senior Center; and WHEREAS, in 2020, the Senior Center operations ceased and has since remained vacant; and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2025, the City Council of the City of Suisun City declared the Property exempt surplus land pursuant to the Surplus Land Act through City Council Resolution No. 2025- 63 after declining use and costly maintenance and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) needed to maintain the property; and

WHEREAS, an appraisal was conducted on June 26, 2023, and determined a fair market value of $250,000.00; and

WHEREAS, City Staff has negotiated a sales price of the property of $250,000 plus an additional $25,000 contribution to the City’s Public Art Fund; and

WHEREAS, TC Property Management, LTD, has agreed to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, and staff recommends entering into the Agreement for the sale of the property; and WHEREAS, this action is exempt from under (CEQA) Guidelines §15312 as it is a sale of government property.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Suisun City as follows:

Section 1. The City Council adopts Resolution No. 2025-___ approving the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City of Suisun City, as seller, and TC Property Management, LTD, as buyer, for the purchase of real property identified as APN 0173-010-230 (318 Merganser Drive) in the amount of $250,000 in addition to a $25,000 contribution to the City’s Public Art Fund.

Section 2. The City Manager, or designee (each an Authorized Officer), is hereby authorized to execute and deliver, for and in the name of the City, the Agreement, with such additions or changes as the Authorized Officer executing the same may approve (such approval to be conclusively evidenced by such Authorized Officers execution and delivery thereof).

253
ATTACHMENT 1
Section 3. the Authorized Officer is hereby authorized, jointly, and severally, to do all things that they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution and implement the Agreement and the acquisition of the Property by the City, including the execution and recordation of agreements and documents contemplated by the Agreement and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately after its adoption by the Council.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of said City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, this 16
th day of December 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:__________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers:__________________________________ ABSENT: Councilmembers:__________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:__________________________________

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16
th day of December 2025.

____________________________________
Anita Skinner, CMC
City Clerk

254
ATTACHMENT 2

ATTACHMENT 2
Property Location (318 Merganser Drive)

255

GARLAND & SALMON
Report of an Appraisal of
the Property Located at 318 Merganser Dr.,
City of Suisun City, California
DATES OF VALUATION:

Date of Inspection - May 31, 2023
Date of Value - May 31, 2023
Date of Report - June 26, 2023
PREPARED FOR:

Greg Folsom, City Manager
City of Suisun City
701 Civic Center Blvd.

Suisun City, CA 94585
PREPARED BY:

Garland & Salmon
744 Empire Street, Suite 260
Fairfield, California 94533
(707) 429-8660
ATTACHMENT 3
256
Ronald G. Garland, MAI, SRA
Steve Salmon, MAI
Matt Atwood
Marc Tonnesen, SRA

GARLAND &
SALMON

REAL PROPERTY ECONOMICS ANALYSTS & APPRAISERS
June 26, 2023
Greg Folsom
City Manager
City of Suisun City
701 Civic Center Boulevard
Suisun City, CA 94585
Dear Mr. Folsom,
The following is an appraisal report of a 0.32 acre site improved with a 5,275 square foot building formerly used as a community center, the “Suisun Senior Center.” The building is a permitted use for the site under current zoning; however, onsite parking is inadequate. We were informed there is an agreement to share parking with the adjacent property owner, and we have requested a copy for review; however, as of the date of this report, no written agreement has been provided.

Absent a written agreement, it is uncertain as to the legal rights of use of the eight (8) parking spaces on the north side of the building and the nine (9) parking spaces on the east side of the building, located on the adjacent parcel that are under separate ownership. Due to this condition, we have applied a specific assumption, that the subject does not have enforceable legal right for use of the developed parking on the adjacent parcels under separate ownership. However, even if there were a written agreement providing access as discussed, the building does not represent the highest and best use of the site, as if vacant and available for development. Therefore, in this assignment, we also have applied a hypothetical condition.

The intended use of the appraisal is to serve as a valuation guide for asset management decision and/or relating to a potential sale of the subject property. The appraisal assignment is to form an opinion of the market value of the subject property as of the date of value.

Please refer to the A
SSUMPTIONS & LIMITING CONDITIONS and SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL, which detail and limit this report, located on Pages V through VIII of this INTRODUCTION. The market value opinions offered are consistent with the DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE included in this report. This report is intended to be in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). party or for any other use. 744 Empire Street, Suite 260, Fairfield, California, 94533 Ë Phone 707/429-8660 ATTACHMENT 3
257
ATTACHMENT 3
258
III

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Subject Property Owner of Record City of Suisun City, a Municipal Corporation
Assessor Parcel Number 0173-010-230
Property Address 318 Merganser Drive
Suisun City, CA 94585
Site 0.32 ± Acres
13,939 ± Square Feet
Easements: The subject site is encumbered by a 25-foot
joint access easement for the benefit of the
adjoining parcels; with two access
easements encumbering the adjoining
parcels for the benefit of the subject site.

Improvements A 5,275 ± square foot building formerly
used as a community center, the “Suisun
City Senior Center”
Topography The site is generally level; slightly above
street grade. Location is on the north side of
Merganser Drive, abutted on it’s north and
east by the Casa de Suisun senior apartment
complex.

Zoning City of Suisun City
High Density Residential (RH1)
General Plan City of Suisun City
Res Hi PUD
Highest and Best Use, As-Improved Demolition of current improvements to allow for redevelopment
Highest and Best Use, As if Vacant Develop to a multi-family residential use Date of Value March 31, 2023
Property Rights Fee Simple
Market Value Opinion $250,000

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
259
IV

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
PAGE
Letter of Transmittal ........................................................... I E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y .......................................................... I I I T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s ............................................................ I V Assumptions & Limiting Conditions ............................................. V I S c o p e o f t h e A p p r a i s a l........................................................V I I P r o f e s s i o n a l Q u a l i f i c a t i o n s o f S t e v e n M . S a l m o n ...................................X I I

ANALYSIS
A p p r a i s a l A s s i g n m e n t ..........................................................1 Client, Intended Use, and User ....................................................2 D a t e s o f A p p r a i s a l .............................................................3 P r o p e r t y R i g h t s A p p r a i s e d .......................................................3 Definition of Market Value.......................................................3 A p p r a i s a l P r o c e s s..............................................................4 L o c a t i o n .....................................................................4 L e g a l D e s c r i p t i o n ..............................................................4 General Economic Conditions Overview ............................................5 Covid 19 Overview.............................................................6 Solano County & Fairfield/Suisun City Market Area Overview ..........................7 Commercial Marketplace Overview................................................9 Office Marketplace Overview ...................................................1 0 Residential Marketplace Overview................................................1 1 R e s i d e n t i a l D e v e l o p m e n t L a n d ...................................................1 5 M a r k e t A r e a O v e r v i e w.........................................................1 7 I m m e d i a t e S u b j e c t E n v i r o n s .....................................................1 9 Description of the Subject Property ...............................................2 1 Highest and Best Use As-Vacant .................................................2 7 Highest and Best Use As-Improved ...............................................2 9 V a l u a t i o n ....................................................................3 1 Exposure Time ...............................................................40 C e r t i f i c a t i o n .................................................................4 1

PAGE EXHIBITS ADDENDA
Location Map Subject Photographs
Area Map Comparable Sale Data
Immediate Subject Environs Map Preliminary Title Report Subject Parcel Map
Subject Aerial Depiction
Easements: Parcel Map Lands of Suisun City
Subject Site Plan
Comparable Sale Map

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
260
V

ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
This appraisal is subject to the following SPECIFIC assumptions and limiting conditions:

Hypothetical Condition is an assumption which is contrary to what is firmly known to exist, but is supposed or assumed for the purpose of discussion or analysis. In compliance with requirements of the USPAP, we are informing readers and users of this appraisal that the use of hypothetical condition(s), if that condition did not transfer into actual existence in the form that in which it is hypothesized, would impact the assignment analysis, conclusions and opinions.

There are no hypothetical conditions pertaining to this assignment:

1. The subject property improvements do not represent the highes t and best use of the property as improved; and due to the lack of controlled parking do not support an economic use in the marketplace. We have appraised the property as if it is vacant and ready for development to its highest and best use; being multi-family development.

Extraordinary Assumption
is an assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, which if found to be false, could alter the appraisers’ opinions or conclusions. In compliance with requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, we are informing readers and users of this appraisal that the use of extraordinary assumption(s), if those assumptions are found not to be true, may impact the assignment analysis, conclusions and opinions.

1. The client is the City of Suisun City. The intended user is the client and appropriate city staff. The intended use of the appraisal is serve as a valuation guide for decisions relating to the potential sale of the property. Garland & Salmon does not authorize the use of this appraisal by any other party or for any other use.

2. The subject property was subdi vided and created along with the two adjacent parcels to the north and east; at the time the three parcels were legally created, reciprocal ingress and egress access easements were recorded; and it is reported there was a shared use agreement for the benefit of the subject providing for the right to use developed parking on the north and east sides of the subject property. No shared use agreement was provided, and absent a written agreement it is uncertain if the subject maintains the legal right to the 17 developed parking spaces. It is a specific assumption the subject does not have enforceable legal right of use for the developed parking on the adjacent parcels under separate ownership.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
261
VI
The appraisal is subject to the following GENERAL assumptions and limiting conditions.

1. Reliance upon the work product resulting from this assignment by any intended user is implied concurrence that the Scope of Work and Assumption and Limiting Conditions of the assignment is appropriate for the intended use of that intended user.

2. Unless specifically set forth in the body of the report, noth ing contained herein shall be construed to represent any direct or indirect recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or construct the property appraised at the appraised value. Such decisions involve substantial investment strategy questions and must be specifically addressed in consultation form.

3. Unless otherwise stated in the report, the existence of hazar dous substances, which may or may not be present on the property, were not called to my attention nor did I become aware of such during the inspection. I have no knowledge of the existence of such substances on or in the property unless otherwise stated and I am not qualified to test for such substances. The presence of such hazardous substances may affect the value of the property. The value opinion reported herein is predicated on the assumption that no such hazardous substances in or on the property or in such proximity thereto which would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or knowledge required to discover them.

4. No liability is assumed for matters legal in character.

5. I assume that there are no defects of title and that the prop erty is free and clear of all liens or encumbrances.

6. No right or obligation to expert testimony or attendance in c ourt by reason of this appraisal, with reference to the property in question, is included unless arrangements have been previously made.

7. Possession of the report, or a copy thereof, does not carry w ith it the right of publication, nor may it be used for any purposes by any but the principal to whom it is addressed without said principal's previous written consent, and in any event, only with proper qualifications.

8. The information furnished by others is believed to be accurat e and reliable, but no guarantee is made as to the correctness thereof.

9. Any sketches in the report are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property.

Land dimensions were taken from available information and we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of such land dimensions.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
262
VII

10. The projections of costs, income, and expenses for the subje ct property are not predictions of the future. These projections are our best estimates of the current market thinking about what future income and expenses will be. I make no warranty or representation that these projections will materialize. The real estate market is constantly fluctuating and changing. It is not my task to estimate the conditions of a future real estate market. I can only reflect what the investment community envisions for the future in terms of rental rates, expenses, supply and demand.

11. That neither all nor any parts of the content of the report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute, or to the MAI or SRA designations) shall be disseminated to the public through any media or to any other parties without prior written consent and approval.

12. We assume that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions which would influence the value of the subject property.

13. Steven Salmon and Marc Tonnesen are certified by the State o f California as a General Real Estate Appraisers. However, they are not licensed or certified in the fields of building inspection or civil, soils, structural, or environmental engineering. We believe that the subject property is not adversely impacted by hidden or unapparent conditions relative to these fields, unless otherwise stated within the report.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
263
VIII

SCOPE OF WORK

1. Discussed with the client the nature of the assignment, inclu ding an agreement of the purpose and intended use of the report, date of valuation and report, property rights appraised, any extraordinary assumptions, values to be reported, and any other appropriate restrictions or limitations to be placed on the scope of the assignment

2. Steven Salmon and Marc Tonnesen spoke on the telephone with J ohn Kearns with the city of Suisun City Planning Department, specifically about what alternative uses the subject property could be put to and asked for a copy of a reported “shared use agreement” that is reported to provide rights to developed parking to the benefit of the subject property.

3. Steven Salmon and Marc Tonnesen inspected, measured and photo graphed the subject property on May 31, 2023.

4. During the inspection, we interviewed Gemma Geluz with of the City of Suisun Public Works Department (who provided us with access to the subject property and accompanied us on the inspection) regarding her knowledge of the history of the subject property and recent rehabilitation work related to the current condition of the property.

5. Reviewed the preliminary title report and investigated the cu rrent ownership and recent history of the subject property.

6. Investigated the neighborhood and surrounding areas in relati on to the impact of these locales on the subject property.

7. Formed an opinion of the highest and best use of the subject property.

8. Researched comparable sale data, including public records, ot her appraisers, active and knowledgeable brokers and publications providing comparable sale data. All comparable properties were inspected either as part of this assignment, as part of past assignments or travels throughout the Solano County area.

9. Confirmed comparable data to the extent necessary, preferably with parties immediate to each transaction, or with other appraisers that verified such data.

10. Developed opinions of value for the subject property by use of appropriate appraisal techniques.

11. Prepared the written report document in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. It is not our intent nor is it even possible for an appraisal report document to include all facts and analysis considered by the appraiser during the course of their appraisal analysis. The scope of the report document is intended to be appropriate for the intended use of the appraisal.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
264
IX

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
STEVEN M. SALMON, MAI
Steve Salmon is an Appraiser with Garland & Salmon, Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants and is active in the appraisal and analysis of single and multi-family residential, commercial office, retail, light industrial, speculative land, development land, and agricultural land. Mr.

Salmon is also active in providing valuation services in support of litigation, of properties affected by eminent domain actions, and is practiced in appraising fee and easement interests.

In addition to appraisal, Mr. Salmon is active in the analysis of various complex and special purpose properties; including the valuation of conservation easements, fractional interests, and complex or specialized property highest and best use. Mr. Salmon is certified by the State of California Office of Real Estate Appraisers as a Certified General Real Estate Appraiser (AG044622), and holds the MAI designation of the Appraisal Institute. Mr. Salmon was the 2022 President of the Northern California Chapter of the Appraisal Institute and is currently serving as Immediate Past President.

EMPLOYMENT
May - 2021 Owner, Garland & Salmon
May - 2018 Partner, Garland & Salmon
December - 2014 MAI designated Appraiser Employed with Garland and Associates as an Associate Appraiser
August - 2010 State of California Licensed Certified General App raiser Employed with Garland and Associates as an Associate Appraiser
September - 2006 Employed with Garland and Associates as a Real Estate Analyst 2001-2006 Rent.com - Santa Monica, California - Regional Sales E xecutive

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
265
X

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
STEVEN M. SALMON, MAI (Continued)

EDUCATION
University Pomona College, Clare mont, California, Bachelor of Arts in English (2001)
Appraisal Courses Appraisal Institute:

USPAP Update (2022)
Standards of Professional Business Practice & Ethics (2019) Solving Land Valuation Puzzles (2018)
Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (2018) Valuation of Conservation Easements (2016)
Application & Interpretation of Simple Linear Regression (2016) Litigation Appraising: Specialized Topics & Applications (2016) Condemnation Appraising: Principles & Applications (2015) The Appraiser as an Expert Witness: Preparation & Testimony (2015) Advanced Applications (2011)
Advanced Sales Comparisons & Cost Approaches (2009)
Real Estate Finance Statistics and Valuation Modeling (2009) General Appraiser Report Writing and Case Studies (2009) Advanced Income Capitalization (2008)
General Appraiser Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use (2008) General Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach (2008) General Appraiser Sale Comparison Approach (2007)
Basic Income Capitalization (2007)
Basic Appraisal Procedures (2006)
Basic Appraisal Principles (2006)

RECENT PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
Appraisal Institute - Northern California Chapter:

President (2022)
Treasurer (2021)
Secretary (2020)
Director (2018 - 2019)
Lake Tahoe Conference - Speaker (2022)
Spring Conference - Speaker (2018)
Commercial Symposium - Speaker (2016)

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
266
XI

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS

MARC TONNESEN, SRA

Marc Tonnesen is an appraiser with Garland & Salmon, Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants and is active in the appraisal and analysis of single and multi-family residential, commercial, office, retail, light industrial, speculative land, development land and agricultural land. He is certified by the State of California, Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers as a Certified General Appraiser (AG008098) and holds the SRA designation of the Appraisal Institute.

Prior to associating with Garland & Salmon, Marc served as the elected Solano County Assessor/Recorder for 16 years. In his dual role: as County Assessor, Marc was responsible for 153,000 parcels with as assessed value of $65 billion; as County Recorder, he was responsible for placing on record 100,000 documents annually and maintaining the County's Vital Records.

Throughout his tenure as County Assessor, Marc was a member of the California Assessors' Association, a statewide association whose members include all 58 California County Assessors, where he took on a variety of leadership roles including serving as President in 2015.

Prior to serving Solano County, Marc was a Real Estate Officer for the State of California with responsibility for negotiating commercial leases for office, retail and industrial use; buying real property for state use; analyzing and selling state-owned real property surplus to the state’s needs; reviewing real estate appraisals and purchase transactions performed by other state agencies; and, performing bond due diligence assignments for state-owned real property.

EMPLOYMENT
April 2023 Appraiser, Garland & Salmon
January 2007 – December 2022 Assessor/Recorder, Solano County March 2003 – December 2006 Assistant Assessor/Recorder, Solano C ounty January 1994 - February 2003 State of California, Dept of Genera l Services, Real Estate Services Division, Professional Services
Branch: Positions held
Senior Real Estate Officer (07/01 - 02/03)
Staff Real Estate Officer (03/98 - 06/01)
Associate Real Estate Officer (01/94 - 02/98)
April 1990 – December 1993 Appraiser , Garland & Associates / Tonnesen Appraisal Service
November 1987 – April 1990 Associate Real Estate Officer, State of California, Department of General Services, Office of Real
Estate & Design Services
January 1986 – October 1987 Appraiser , California, Dept. of Savings & Loan

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
267
XII

EDUCATION
Formal
Bachelor of Business Administration, National University Appraisal Institute
Advanced Income Capitalization
General Appraisal Market Analysis and Highest and Best Use Real Estate Finance Statistics and Valuation Modeling
General Appraiser Income Approach Parts 1 and 2
Basic Appraisal Principles
Basic Appraisal Procedures
General Appraiser Sales Comparison Approach
General Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach
Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation
Residential Valuation
Continuing Education, Appraisal
Ad Valorem Tax Consultation
Commercial Land Evaluation
Expert Witness for Commercial Appraisers
Fundamental Concepts of Analysis
Appraisal of Self-Storage Facilities
Wind Projects and Land Value
Valuation of Easements and Other Partial Interests
Subdivision Valuation
Eminent Domain and Condemnation
Analyzing Operating Expenses
Analyzing Distressed Real Estate
Real Estate Investment Analysis & Valuation

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES / MEMBERSHIPS
Licensed Real Estate Broker (01092913) California, Department of Real Estate SRA designation, Appraisal Institute
Member, International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO)

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
268
1 THE ASSIGNMENT
The client has requested a market value opinion of the subject property, a building formerly used as a community center, the “Suisun City Senior Center.” The building is a permitted use of the site under current zoning, however, onsite parking is inadequate for the current use or an alternative use. We were informed there is an agreement to share parking with the ownership of the Casa de Suisun apartment complex adjacent to the subject property. However, as of the date of this report, no written agreement has been provided for review.

In our opinion, the subject property has nine (9) on-site parking spaces located on the west side of the property. These spaces belong to the subject property and are located on the subject site.

There are an additional eight (8) parking spaces located on the north side (to the rear) of the subject property, plus nine (9) parking spaces on the east side of the subject property. However, absent a legally enforceable shared use agreement, we do not believe these additional 17 parking spaces are available for the subject property use because they are physically located on the adjacent property (Parcel “B”) to the north. We have been told of the existence of a shared use agreement between the city and adjoining property owner to allow for access to these additional spaces; however, no written agreement has been produced.

It is a specific assumption the subject does not have enforceable legal right of use for the developed parking on the adjacent parcels under separate ownership.

The subject property improvements do not represent the highest and best use of the property as improved; and due to the lack of controlled parking do not support an economic use in the marketplace. We have appraised the property as if it is vacant and ready for development to its highest and best use; being multi-family development.

The Suisun City Senior Center was developed somewhat in conjunction with the adjacent Casa de Suisun Seniors apartment complex, a 108-unit 55 and older apartment complex. There was an intended synergy between Casa de Suisun and the Suisun City Senior Center.

The city of Suisun City Joseph Nelson Community Center opened in 2002. The Joseph Nelson Community Center is located at the northeast corner of Merganser and Village Drives only a third of a mile west of the Senior Center. The Joseph Nelson Community Center is vastly superior to the Senior Center in architecture, quality, and amenities. The Joseph Nelson Community Center has essentially captured all of the hall rental demand in the marketplace leaving the Senior Center absent operational funding intended to be created by hall rental income. The Nelson Center simply became a more attractive, and comfortable, place for classes

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
269
2 and community events which formerly occurred at the Senior Center.

In 2012, the Salvation Army-operated Ray & Joan Kroc Center opened its doors. It is located about one-half mile northeast of the Suisun City Senior Center. This is a 60,000 square foot facility which features such amenities as both indoor and outdoor lap and recreational pools, abundant state of the art exercise equipment, class and meeting rooms, locker/shower facilities, a kitchen, and abundant additional features and amenities. Again, as with the Nelson Center, the Kroc Center is vastly superior to the Suisun City Senior Center in architecture, quality, and amenities.

Over time, patronage of the Suisun City Senior Center waned as competing facilities offered much more, and higher quality events in comparison to the Senior Center. As patronage waned, City staffing of the Senior Center waned, leading to ever decreasing hours of operation. The downward spiral of the Suisun City Senior Center was gradual. It appears that the COVID 19 pandemic played into the ceasing of the operations of the Suisun City Senior Center. It appears that COVID induced individual event cancellations occurred which adds to the cloudiness of the Center’s closure. The City’s decision was not a decision to close the Suisun City Senior Center.

Rather, it was a decision to not reopen the Center.

Ted Caldwell is the owner of the adjacent Casa de Suisun senior apartments. Over some period of time the City and Mr. Caldwell had been discussing the potential of Mr. Caldwell acquiring the Suisun City Senior Center in order to redevelop the property to integrate it into the Casa de Suisun project. Later in this report, we will analyze a recent email from Mr. Caldwell to the city offering to purchase the subject property and integrate it into his Casa de Suisun senior apartment project.

This appraisal is intended to be in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The value opinion is in terms of cash or cash equivalence.

CLIENT, INTENDED USE & USERS
The client is the city of Suisun City. The intended user is the client and appropriate city staff.

The intended use of the appraisal is to serve as a valuation guide for asset management decision and/or relating to a potential sale of the subject property. Garland & Salmon does not authorize the use of this appraisal by any other party or for any other use.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
270
3 DATES OF APPRAISAL
Date of Inspection - May 31, 2023
Date of Value - May 31, 2023
Date of Report - June 26, 2023

PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED
This is an appraisal of the fee simple estate interest in the subject property defined as “absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat.” 1 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE
Market Value is “The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus.

Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:

1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated;

2. Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests;

3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;

4. Payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of Financial arrangements comparable thereto; and

5. The price represents the normal consideration for the propert y sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale."
2 1 Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7thed., Appraisal Institute 2 The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14thed., Appraisal Institute

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
271
4 APPRAISAL PROCESS
An appraisal is the act or process of forming an opinion of value. In this appraisal we will form an opinion of the market value of the fee simple interest in the subject property. In order to estimate the fee simple value of the subject, we will analyze those external and internal salient characteristics of the property. As a means of quantifying value, various marketplace activities will be analyzed.

In this appraisal, we will analyze available marketplace activity by the Sales Comparison Approach to value. The Sales Comparison Appoach is a direct analysis of sales of comparable properties to draw conclusions regarding the value of the subject property. The market provided sufficient data for the Sales Comparison Approach.

The other two common approaches to value, namely the Cost and Income Approaches were considered, however, deemed not applicable for this assignment as they are not reflective of market participant behavior in the purchase of sites similar to the subject site, as if vacant.

LOCATION
The subject property is located at 318 Merganser Drive, in the City of Suisun City, California.

More specificaly, the subject is located on the north side of Merganser Drive, approximately 500 feet east of the north/south arterial Sunset Avenue, and approximately 1/4 mile north of State Highway 12.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Property is legally described as Parcel “C” as shown on the Parcel Map, Lands of the City of Suisun City, filed for record September 18, 1986 in Book 30 of Parcel Maps, at Page 15, Solano County Records. The subject property is commonly known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 0173- 010-230.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
272
ATTACHMENT 3
273
5 GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OVERVIEW
The December 2022 UCLA Anderson Forecast update reports regional and national economic conditions to remain uncertain, with the looming recessionary indications showing. The combined impact of inflation, rising interest rates, declining real wages, and consumer pessimism is slowing growth. In addition, much of the national outlook is based on the Federal Reserve's raising interest rates, and it's impacts on inflation. Regionally, California appears to be better suited due to the strength of the construction, service, and defense sectors which could lessen potential recession impacts.

Inflation that once seemed transitory has become persistent, resulting in the Federal Reserve's more aggressive rate increases in 2022. Higher rates are anticipated to slow business investment, leading to increased recessionary risks.

With economists’ optimism for the final quarter of 2022 finishing strong, the focus is on 2023, with economic growth anticipated to slow. It is unclear if or when such growth figures will result in a recession, but predictions tend to favor a more mild and brief recession. Economists are watching the intersection of supply chain and inflation, with the easing of supply chain pressures favoring a limited to non-existent recession.
• It is anticipated economic growth will slow to an annual rate of 2% to 3% in the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2023, with 4th quarter bottoming and then rebounding in 2024. • Historically, Federal Reserve-driven recessions tend to result in a larger decline in residential and business investments due to increasing interest rates.

As it relates to California, UCLA Anderson Forecast expects:
• The California non-farm jobs number has surpassed the February 2020 level by 31,000 jobs- although the breakdown in sectors is more pronounced, with leisure and hospitality still suffering, lacking 170,000 jobs.
• Housing still trails the peak of 2021, with October 2022 median price 8.4% below the high-water mark.

In spite of the slowing economy, continued demand for limited housing stock leads to a forecast of a continued surge in construction. With the expansion of accessory dwelling units and infrastructure projects, this sector will help offset the more national impacts of rising interest

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
274
6 rates. Overall, California is better suited for a slowing or recession of the national economy.

We note that since the 2022 December Forecast, the global banking system has had additional turmoil surrounding the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, March 10, 2023 and First Republic Bank, May 1, 2023. This has put further stress on the current economic position of both the nation and California. Financial market participants remain worried about continued federal rate increases while the banking sector has yet to land on solid ground. While not to the level of the 2008 banking crisis and following recession, the market is clearly aware of continued issues within the economy and recession is a worry.

COVID-19 PANDEMIC OVERVIEW
COVID-19 is a commonly referenced name for the severe acute respiratory syndrome first identified by the World Health Organization during December 2019 and began to impact the United States economy in February 2020. Since then there has been a pandemic spread throughout most of the world and resulted in widespread economic impacts not seen since the Great Recession in 2008/2009.

The infection and death rates do not mathematically relate to this appraisal. However, the depth and breath of this virus spread is important to this appraisal.

More directly related to real estate markets are the economic impacts of the pandemic. During the spring of 2020, the number of employed persons plummeted by nearly 25 million or 16%.

Of course initially this loss of wages had huge impacts, part of which were mitigated by various government agencies and projects.

The apparent significant pandemic economic ramifications among others include:
• A breakdown in many product supply chains. Shortages of a wid e range of goods and some services are widely evident in stores, online retailers, and distribution warehouses. • Employee shortages have been widely evident in many historically lower wage rate employment categories, particularly in the retail, hospitality, and restaurant industries.

Many retail and restaurant enterprises continue to not be able to staff full historical operating hours.
• After historical inflation bei ng in the range of 2%, the January 2021 to January 2022 CPI increase was 7.8%. Other notable areas of inflation which are not directly measured

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
275
7 within the CPI include lumber and other building materials, lodging, and rental cars. The marketplace effects of these non CPI measured inflation rates have yet to fully work their way into CPI measured factors. Inflation of these rates has not existed since the 1980s.

Controlling inflation has been a major focus of government agencies throughout 2022, directly impacting the real estate markets with changes in mortgage rates.

Traditionally, during periods of greater rates of inflation there is a flight of capital from paper investments (stocks, bonds, cash and other financial instruments) to hard tangible assets. While there are other tangible reinvestment targets such as precious metals and commodities, the primary tangible asset reinvestment target has been real estate. That is the case with this COVID-19 economy induced inflation cycle.

In a broad perspective, there has been significant harvesting of stock market profits to be reinvested in real estate. As with everything else in this COVID-19 economy, some real estate categories have done well and some have stumbled; the COVID-19 economy has had a diverse spectrum of real estate impacts that are property type and local market driven.

In 2022, the macroeconomic impacts of the pandemic became more normalized; however inflation worries have impacted some sectors, and the aggressive rate raising in Federal Reserve policy has impacted interest rates.

We note that as recessionary fears increase and interest rates continue to increase, there has been a pull back in development and an increasingly less risk tolerant lending environment.

Redevelopment of the subject has substantial development risk, resulting in a more limited pool of potential buyers who would be looking to buy and hold until market conditions improve.

SOLANO COUNTY & CITY OF FAIRFIELD/SUISUN OVERVIEW
The purpose of this report section is to highlight and provide historical information on economic issues that are relevant to the area economy on the date of value, and in relevant real estate marketplaces. Solano County is located roughly midway between San Francisco to the southwest and Sacramento to the northeast, and is the most eastern of the San Francisco Bay Area's nine counties.

The majority of the urban areas in Solano County are positioned along Interstate Freeways-80 and -680, which converge in the center of the county. An Area Map is located on the following page.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
276
ATTACHMENT 3
277
8 The major element of growth in Solano County has been migration into the county by both businesses and families. The county offers rare circumstances found nowhere else in the San Francisco Bay Area, being most notably relatively affordable housing, available and reasonably priced land, nearby educational opportunities as well as a wide variety of recreational activities.

Geographically, Solano County extends from Vallejo on the southwest to Dixon on the northeast, but locally the county is referred to as southern Solano County and northern Solano County. Southern Solano County is located adjacent to the Sacramento River Delta, Suisun Bay as well as San Pablo Bay, and consists of the three waterfront communities of Vallejo, Benicia and Rio Vista. Northern Solano County consists of the county seat city of Fairfield and the cities of Suisun City, Vacaville and Dixon.

Regionally, Solano County is a secondary market area that is located on the fringe of the core Bay Area; historically it has been the least affluent of the nine Bay Area counties, and has historically developed to provide lower cost suburban housing for workers commuting to employment centers located in core Bay Area market areas, and to a lesser extent to Sacramento market area employment centers.

The subject property is located in the city of Suisun City. Adjacent Fairfield is the second largest city, and is the County seat. Based on ABAG and other population studies, it is anticipated that work centers within a 1-hour commute of the Fairfield-Suisun area are expected to remain strong throughout the decade.

This area is particularly appealing to households who split the commute between the major employment centers of Contra Costa
County/the inner Bay Area and the Sacramento area. In
addition, families are attracted to moving to the Fairfield-Suisun area from larger and more expensive population centers to avoid congestion, and to improve the general quality of life.

Major corporations having a profound signature presence in the Fairfield-Suisun area include Anheuser-Busch and the Jelly Belly Candy Company that manufactures the world-renowned Jelly Belly jelly beans, as well as other candies.

Travis Air Force Base, a major area employer, is clearly increasing in importance and thus would appear to indicate that the future of Travis is relatively secure. Travis is the primary Air Mobility Command base for the United States west coast, and the Base is also the host of other large aircraft missions for both the Army and Navy.

The March 2023 California Association of Realtors Single Family Home Sales and Price

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
278
9 Activity report is shown in the following table; highlighting the regional median home price disparity between Solano County in comparison to core Bay Area counties, and its historical rank and appeal in comparison to other comparably lower cost Sacramento Valley counties.

Median Sold Price of Existing Single-Family Homes
S.F. Bay Area Mar-23 Feb-23 Mar-22 Price
YTY% Chg
Sales YTY%
Chg
Alameda $1,225,000 $1,100,000 $1,430,000 -14.3% -36.8%
Contra Costa $852,500 $760,000 $965,900 -11.7% -42.7%
Marin $1,600,000 $1,447,500 $1,720,000 -7.0% -39.4%
Napa $890,000 $830,000 $965,000 -7.8% -32.7%
San Francisco $1,700,000 $1,465,000 $2,060,000 -17.5% -37.9% San Mateo $1,860,000 $2,080,000 $2,280,000 -18.4% -37.7% Santa Clara $1,700,000 $1,500,000 $1,950,000 -12.8% -31.9% Solano $585,000 $555,000 $610,000 -4.1% -21.3%
Sonoma $829,000 $774,500 $829,000 0.0% -31.8%
Central Valley Mar-23 Feb-23 Mar-22 Price
YTY% Chg
Sales YTY%
Chg
Merced $400,000 $381,950 $385,000 3.9% -38.1%
Placer $641,000 $633,750 $701,730 -8.7% -22.7%
Sacramento $500,000 $499,000 $560,000 -10.7% -31.9%
San Joaquin $544,550 $491,500 $550,000 -1.0% -17.5%
Stanislaus $449,000 $429,900 $470,500 -4.6% -34.3%
Yolo $618,030 $550,000 $657,000 -5.9% -18.9%

COMMERCIAL MARKETPLACE OVERVIEW
At this time, we wish to comment on our view as to the overall state of the area wide commercial real estate marketplace, and how we will relate that view to our analysis. Following the 2008 recession, the overall marketplace stabilized in the second half of 2011 when positive absorption began occurring; albeit with modest annual absorption levels. With strong growth in the residential market in 2015-2018, the wider commercial market saw year-over-year appreciation going into 2020.

As covered in our Covid-19 section, the commercial real estate market was impacted by the pandemic with the varying property types, classes, and markets all experiencing different levels of disruption or growth. A notable change has been the focus on housing as housing prices saw record breaking appreciation in a short period of time. In other commercial sectors the impacts were less positive, with stay-at-home orders, office property and some retail uses struggling to maintain economic feasibility.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
279
10 As of spring 2023, the volatility related to the pandemic has largely left the market and the focus has now moved to interest rates and recessionary fears. Investors are more concerned about risk, and there are fewer dollars available in the marketplace. While many market segments have returned to near pre-pandemic levels of stability, office properties are still suffering with lack of demand and retail is continuing to experience contracted demand that likely stems from a move to online shopping and away from historical retail sectors.

Marketplace tolerance for risk is low; despite notable increases in demand and value for some prime assets, participants continue to prefer to compete for prime assets rather than attempt unproven, or secondary assets. It appears that until competition for prime assets boils over, the secondary asset marketplace will continue to see underwhelming levels of demand and absorption.

OFFICE MARKETPLACE OVERVIEW
Generally speaking, the Competitive Market Area (CMA) of the subject property is overbuilt.

Napa County is generally superior to Solano County both in terms of absorption and market rental rates; Fairfield/Suisun and Vacaville are generally rated as similar submarkets, with the Green Valley area of Fairfield typically generating slightly higher absorption and market rent rates due to superior linkages to the East Bay market area. Overall, Suisun City encompasses a smaller percentage of the overall square footage of office space in the area and is generally considered a small submarket of the larger Fairfield market.

Despite the robust growth of the Bay Area office marketplace over the previous multi-year expansion cycle, the pandemic has significantly impacted the demand for office space in the prime Bay Area markets. Solano County has typically been a commuter residential location for the core Bay Area and Sacramento Metroplex regional market areas. This dynamic results in only moderate job growth occurring in Solano County when the Bay Area and Sacramento regional market areas experience growth, and more significant loss when demand drops. As these markets struggle, tenants once attracted to the cheaper Fairfield/Suisun City marketplace, are drawn back to the core Bay Area markets, and vacancy in the secondary and tertiary markets has increased.

The CMA of the subject property has typically been dominated by government users, and owner users. Historically stubbornly high vacancy levels has led to lackluster rent growth, effectively resulting in the lack of new construction. Prior to the pandemic in 2020, within the CMA of the subject property, health care providers and healthcare related general office users have been

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
280
11 more active in the marketplace; North Bay Healthcare, Sutter Medical Group, and Partnership Health Plan have all constructed owner occupied medical and general office buildings.

Overall, the impacts of the pandemic on office space users in both prime and secondary markets such as the subject has resulted in increased vacancy and limited rental rate growth. Both large and smaller user spaces continue to exhibit lackluster levels of demand and there is no indication of this changing soon.

Through the Covid-19 pandemic there has been wide reaching impacts on the historical use of office space and thus impacts on the office real estate segment as a whole. The widespread expansion of the remote work has shifted the market place with end-users favoring to work from home than occupy an office full time. This has greatly reduced the demand for office space and altered the total square footage firms need. As such, lease renewels for office space have plummeted and rental rates have seen drastic reductions with office space vacancy climbing to unsustainable levels.

Due to these changes in office demand, we are seeing lower valuations and higher rates for office properties. There is general worry that we are heading into a period of defaults of commercial office loans as renewals become due.

It appears at this time the strength of the office market in the CMA of the subject is the relatively low cost of living and business expenses, and the Vacaville/Fairfield/Suisun submarket is a secondary market area whose primary advantage is low rent levels. Due to the sector wide lack of demand and the impacts of the pandemic, it is anticipated the office market in the CMA of the subject property will not significantly improve in the near term.

RESIDENTIAL MARKETPLACE OVERVIEW
The table on the following page shows single family residential market trends for the Solano County market area gleaned from BAREIS® MLS records that highlights annual total sale transaction volume and median price levels, as well as year over year median home price trends for the time period of 2016 through April 12, 2023. This data was researched utilizing the Bay Area Real Estate Information Services (BAREIS) MLS database.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
281
12 BAREIS® Multiple Listing Data
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023*
# Sales # Sales # Sales # Sales # Sales # Sales # Sales # Sales Median $ Median $ % ± Median $ % ± Median $ % ± Median $ % ± Median $ % ± Median $ % ± Median $ % ± Competitive Market Area (CMA)
Benicia 260 258 241 252 272 271 194 52
$609,600 9.8% $639,500 4.9% $675,000 5.6% $658,000 -2.5% $699,100 6.2% $840,000 20.2% $865,500 3.0% $827,500 -4.4% Dixon 190 194 205 213 266 281 285 84
$380,500 8.9% $420,000 10.4% $445,000 6.0% $450,000 1.1% $486,000 8.0% $570,000 17.3% $627,500 10.1% $606,453 -3.4% Fairfield 1,367 1,301 1,291 1,254 1,294 1,331 955 281
$415,000 9.2% $428,000 3.1% $465,000 8.6% $467,450 0.5% $515,000 10.2% $575,000 11.7% $630,000 9.6% $624,000 -1.0% Suisun City 404 415 280 317 313 347 246 73
$337,750 11.1% $371,500 10.0% $400,000 7.7% $413,000 3.3% $431,000 4.4% $525,000 21.8% $560,000 6.7% $541,000 -3.4% Vacaville 1,369 1,293 1,194 1,245 1,415 1,489 1,110 294 $400,000 9.6% $420,000 5.0% $455,000 8.3% $468,000 2.9% $500,000 6.8% $580,000 16.0% $631,000 8.8% $607,500 -3.7% Woodland 583 546 513 573 604 668 460 126
$350,000 7.7% $381,000 8.9% $400,000 5.0% $450,000 12.5% $452,500 0.6% $525,000 16.0% $550,000 4.8% $520,000 -5 .5% Solano 5,128 4,927 4,561 4,662 4,987 5,323 4,309 1,155
County $385,000 10.0% $410,000 6.5% $445,000 8.5% $450,000 1.1% $490,000 8.9% $565,000 15.3% $600,000 6.2% $580,000 -3.3% * Recorded Sales Through April 12 , 2023

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
282
13 Strong annual home price appreciation occurred up to 2018; with prices flattening a bit in 2019.

However, the market began building increasing levels of momentum in 2020, with 2021 appreciation rates being robust due to strong levels of demand, limited supply, and historically low interest rates.

Due to rapidly increasing interest rate trends in the second half of 2022, the marketplace began to clearly shift. The majority of cities saw a drop in sales and lower price appreciation in 2022.

As mortgage rates have not gone down in 2023 and recessionary fears continue to grow, the data for 2023 indicates the potential for a major downward shift. At this time there is no projection for a reversal of the current downward trend. However, due to supply continuing to lag behind general demand, price declines have been relatively moderate thus far as compared to the changes seen in 2007-2008.

For perspective, historical price levels in Suisun City are shown in the following graph, which tracks Median home price trends over the 1993 to 2023(Year-to-date, April 12, 2023) time period.

The blue line tracks the changes in annual median home prices in Suisun City, with the red line being the historical trend line over the 30-year period. The volatility of the most recent boom and bust cycles are clearly demonstrated in the blue line, as well as the historical appreciating value trend over time, as demonstrated by the red trend line. Additionally, it appears the pricing peaked in 2022 and is now trending downward.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
283
14 The CMA of the subject continued to see positive annual appreciation into 2022; however, the decline in overall transactions was a leading indicator that the growth seen in 2021 was transitory.

So far in 2023 the decline in pricing for Suisun City is similar across the county, and this data is only from the first 5 months of the year, with the remaining months of the year expected to continue to worsen.

It is unclear how much further the median pricing will fall as the current pricing is still significantly above pre-pandemic levels. If the median home price falls drastically in the remaining months of 2023, feasibility for new projects might come into question as construction and development costs do not always correlate to falling home prices.

We additionally note, that due to the record low mortgage rates in 2020 and 2021, many home buyers have long term loans locked in that disincentives selling their current homes in hopes of moving into a new one as current new mortgage rates are much higher. It is reported that this lack of supply has impacted the supply of homes for sale and impacted the residential market. As a result, new homes are now making up a larger portion of the transaction volume as there is limited supply of existing houses, and developers can offer unique financing options not found in the used market.

California and the CMA of the subject has historically been under supplied in terms of housing and it is anticipated that effective housing demand will remain, albeit at lower levels than during the peak pandemic. In our opinion, effective demand has waned due to increased borrowing costs and while the historical lack of supply issues remains; the overall housing market and the subject's CMA will likely continue to see a downward trend in pricing until recessionary indicators reverse.

While multi-family development appears sustained in the current high interest rate environment, the lack of affordable for sale residential product may create tail winds to support increasing rents and new multi-family development when greater liquidity returns to the market.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
284
15 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LAND
Following is a brief summary of the changes occurring in the residential development land marketplace over the last growth phase; with a discussion of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the current market environs which are reported to have notably deteriorated.

Market participants generally stated that development land prices remained fairly flat over the 2014 to 2019 time period, with increasing single family home development costs largely keeping pace with rising single family residential values.

Similar to historical trends, as long as the core Bay Area remains economically vibrant, Solano's economy/real estate market will typically exhibit upward value trends. Prior to Covid-19, due to dwindling supply, land price up-trending was noted in some secondary market areas; particularly areas that have market preferred regional linkage attributes to the employment centers within the core Bay Area, and/or sites with regional transportation oriented development potential. Sites were regularly acquired contingent upon a tentative map and development agreement being entitled prior to close of escrow, which is now the dominant transaction structure in the marketplace.

Starting in 2020 some upward pricing trends were observed despite rising development costs and fees. Over the 2020 to 2021 time period there was a building trend for homebuilders to acquire unentitled, or minimally entitled land; as after several years of growth the glut of entitled inventory had been largely absorbed, and demand was increasing to build for newly entitled and developed land tracts.

Secondary market areas such as Solano County were seeing upward value movement; due to urban flight and increased demand due to increased access to work from home opportunities, and historically low interest rates. The increasing work from home trend has created new out migration from expensive urban core market areas to suburban market areas. In conversations with developer/homebuilder professionals active in the Solano County marketplace, they indicated that particularly within the last two years the number of buyers from the core greater SF Bay Area has notably increased.

With robust levels of residential demand continuing to exceed supply, and with this dynamic being accelerated due to the strong Covid-19 single family residential market, demand was on the rise. However, by the middle of 2022 the Federal Reserve began an aggressive policy of raising interest rates, and the historically aggressive rise in interest rates is choking buyer effective demand.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
285
16 The central bank's moves pushed mortgage rates from 3% at the start of the 2022 to 7+% at its peak; with current rates receding a bit, due to recent reports that inflation factors are improving.

The Mortgage Brokers Association reports purchase applications are down 32% year over year; reflecting the impact current mortgage rates are having on buyer demand.

On the following page is a slide prepared by the Gregory Group; a leading Northern California residential market research and analysis firm. The slide highlights month by month home pricing changes for the larger Sacramento Valley region going into the end of 2022; which generally tracks similarly, but slightly lower than the Fairfield/Suisun City location of the subject (due to superior regional linkages to the Bay Area).

The graph highlights the robust rise in housing prices prior to the great recession; in comparison to the increase in home prices over the last growth phase. Following the graph is a chart that highlights the corresponding average monthly mortgage payment over the same period; and graphically demonstrates the historically sharp increase in average monthly payments since the start of 2022 due to historically high pricing levels and historically high interest rates.

In December 2022 Lennar, a large national home builder, reported that new home sales dipped 15% year over year. Further, lower than expected margins reflect the growing need to offer incentives to reduce cancellations, and possibly lower prices to attract new buyers. However, it was reported by Lennar that their belief is the duration of the correction is going to be smaller, or more limited.

In June 2023 Reuters report, Lennar raised its full-year forecast for home deliveries, as the homebuilder benefits from upbeat demand that far outpaced supply. It indicated homebuilders are benefiting from the lack of existing home inventory and pent up demand they were unable to meet in previous years. The report went on to say inventory of existing homes remains 44% below pre-pandemic levels, according to data from the National Association of Realtors, resulting in price rises in some parts of the country, multiple offers and homes being sold above list price.

The CMA of the subject still has competitive advantages as an affordable Bay Area commuter location; however, home prices may need to reset in combination with lower interest rates before a healthy market returns. It appears the long term growth opportunity is there, but timing what happens with interest rates is uncertain; and the longer they remain high, the greater the fall in home prices will be required before housing affordability returns to more historical levels.

However, a bright spot remains that supply remains low; the glut of inventory that was present at

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
286
17 the start of the last recessionary cycle is not present now. Levels of inventory are rising as projects that broke ground during the market upswing are now coming online. As noted previously, the percentage of single family home sales in the market that are for new homes is growing.

We note that project's typically take 1-2 years to gain entitlements and approvals in this market area. As such, any development land purchased as of Spring 2023, is looking at delivery of new units at the earliest, late 2024 or early 2025 when most economists seeing the current recessionary cycle ending.

The subject's CMA contains an ample supply of residential development land and only limited activity at this time. The majority of buyers are speculative developers who appear to be waiting for multi-family market rents to reach levels that support feasibility. Due to the significant supply, buyers have multiple options unlike in more densely developed markets. This allows for more strategic development and longer term planning. With a longer term horizon, residential development in this CMA is still attractive to investor/developers who believe they can get in at a good price.

MARKET AREA OVERVIEW
The subject property is located in Suisun City, between Fairfield on the north and the protected Suisun Marsh on the south. The location of Suisun City along the waterfront offers a unique opportunity for waterfront development; this has only been explored during the past two decades. Very limited waterfront property is available for development in the Bay Area counties.

With the anticipated growth patterns in Solano County, high profile development of the Suisun waterfront has been of increasing interest but has yet to materialize during the last decade.

In 1983 Suisun City adopted a specific plan for the historic and waterfront areas to revitalize and rehabilitate Old-Town and the waterfront area. The specific plan included a working waterfront, a historic and viable Main Street area, and an Amtrak rail station. The Amtrak station is on the Capitol Corridor route, which serves the East Bay area and the Sacramento Metroplex, and extends from San Jose to Auburn.

The marina-oriented waterfront has become a popular recreational destination for local residents and those residing outside the area. It is clear that Suisun has made positive strides in increasing the social and economic viability of Suisun City since the 1980s, and it also has been successful in establishing an identity separate from that of Fairfield. The city leaders of Suisun City have made a strong effort to promote the new Waterfront District in Suisun City, and numerous

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
287
18 festivals, events and summer music concerts are successfully raising the area's profile.

However, Suisun City has not seen the growth or increased positive image that was once projected. There has been limited meaningful new development that has significantly improved demand or increased traffic for the downtown waterfront area. Commercial space located in the newer Harbor Square development has sat vacant since its delivery in 2008. While the local restaurants have continued to draw patrons, the overall downtown waterfront area has not seen a substantial expansion of development demand, or improved market perception that warrants substantial new development.

The Solano Transportation Authority developed a new office building at 432 Main Street, with the opening in 2022, and a 71-unit residential development located on Cordelia Street, Crystal School site west of downtown, are the only two recent major projects in the downtown waterfront district. While these indicate demand, the Transportation Authority is a public agency and its development does not directly correlate to market demand or feasibility for a private market investor. The 71-unit project was commenced during the peak of the residential market in 2021, and while the current conditions for such development are inferior to 2021, the project is still moving forward with horizontal site development.

There are two other larger-scale multi-family projects in Suisun City that indicate more regional multi-family apartment development activity and demand. • Marina Village Apartments at Marina Blvd & Highway 12. This i s a proposed affordable housing community that will offer 159 affordable rental units restricted to households earning between 30% and 70% of area median income and will consist of nine three- story garden-style residential buildings and a single-story community building. The unit mix will consist of 39 one-bedroom, 55 two bedroom, and 50 three-bedroom, and 16 four-bedroom units. Phase 1 is planned to be opening in July 2023. • Lawler Center is located at the corner of Lawler Center Drive and Anderson Drive, easily accessible from Highway 12. The Lawler Center consists of three separate buildings on a

2.81 acre site. The main four-story building has 75 apartment homes. The retail comprises two 3,600 square foot single-story buildings with glass storefronts.

Demand for larger apartment sites, due to increased economies of scale are preferred in the current multifamily development environs. It appears at this time multifamily development on smaller infill sites such as the subject site remains stunted, with little to no development activity observed in the CMA of the subject property.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
288
19 IMMEDIATE SUBJECT PROPERTY ENVIRONS
The subject property is located on the north side of Merganser Drive 500 feet west of Sunset Avenue, and and approximately 1/4 mile north of State Highway 12. Specifically the Subject Property is situated between the back of the parking lot of a Class A office building known as 333 Sunset Avenue, and the 104 unit Casa de Suisun seniors only apartment complex. The subject property is also across the street from the Suisun City post office, and the rear delivery access drive for the Sunset Shopping Center. A Location Map is located on the following page.

The subject property is located between the main commercial area of Suisun City being the commercial node centered at the signalized intersection of Sunset Avenue and Highway 12 to its southwest, and the Dover Terrace South subdivision to its east and north.

The Sunset Avenue and Highway 12 commercial node is situated primarily, but not exclusively, on the north side of Highway 12, on both sides of Sunset Avenue. The primary developments in this commercial node are:
• The circa 1981 built 100,000 square foot Sunset Center (retail ) on the east side of Sunset Avenue extending from Highway 12 to Merganser Drive. The majority of the Sunset Center sold in 2013 for less than $145 per square foot or approximately a third of its replacement cost.
• The circa 1989 built 175,000 square foot Heritage Center (retail) on the west side of Sunset Avenue also extending from Highway 12 to Merganser Drive. The majority of the Heritage Center was subject to a Notice of Trustee Sale (foreclosure) in November 2015. The foreclosure was based upon a $29,768,644 Final Judgment or a debt of $170 ± per square foot. What this means is that the institutional investor who previously owned the Heritage Center effectively decided to lose the property in foreclosure and have nothing to show for their prior investment rather than “buying” the Heritage Center for $170 per square foot. The $170 per square foot foreclosure “price” is far less than half of the property’s replacement cost.
• The circa 1994 built 75,000 ± square foot 333 Sunset Avenue office complex located at the northeast corner of Sunset Avenue and Merganser Drive. This is a three-story class A office building. This property sold in 2006 for $188 ± per square foot or at that time about half of its replacement cost new. The property was offered for sale for a year during 2019 and 2020 with an asking price of $200 ± per square foot, but did not sell.

During late 2019, one prospective buyer began a due diligence investigation of the

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
289
ATTACHMENT 3
290
20 property; however, after the buyer investigated the property and its competitive market area, the deal died. From May 2021 until January 2022 the 333 Sunset Avenue property has been offered for sale with an asking price of $160 ± per square foot, and no real interest. Recently the asking price was reduced to $140 ± per square foot. While none of this tells us what the 333 Sunset Avenue property is worth, what it does tell us is that it is definitively worth less than $160 per square foot, and is likely less worth less than $140 per square foot. What this proves is that 333 Sunset Avenue is worth less than a third of its replacement costs. As a note the Subject Property is situated on the north side of Merganser Dive at the rear of the 333 Sunset Avenue property parking lot.

During the past two decades, the Sunset and Heritage retail centers have fluctuated between 25% and 40% vacancy. During that same time period the 333 Sunset Avenue property has experienced 50% and greater vacancy rates. The retail and office product within the Sunset Avenue and Highway 12 commercial node is massively over built in relation to market demand regardless of the market cycle at any
particular point in time. The market area is simply
massively over built. Excepting fast food and gasoline sales buildings, all retail and office buildings within this commercial node are worth only a fraction of their replacement costs.

Abutting the subject property on the north and east sides is the Casa de Suisun senior apartment complex. To the north and east of the apartments is the Dover Terrace South single-family residential subdivision. In all of its phases Dover Terrace South is an approximately 3,500 dwelling development, constructed from circa 1975 to circa 1995. The dwellings typically range from about 1,300 square feet to 2,200 square feet in size. These are average quality dwellings at best, which currently tend to sell in the $400,000 to $600,000 price range.

The Subject Property does not reside within a residential neighborhood nor a commercial district. Rather the Subject Property is isolated between a single family residential neighborhood, and a commercial district. The marketplace does not view the Subject Property as part of either of those market areas.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
291
21 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Ownership/Property History
The subject site is a .32 ± acre portion of a 3.51 ± acre site the city purchased in June 1977. In December 1985, the city ground leased approximately 3.19 ± acres (exclusive of the .32 ± acre subject site) to D&M Development Company. In July 1986, the city split the 3.51 ± acre parcel into three legal parcels: Parcel “A” (1.744 ± acres), Parcel “B” (1.444 ± acres) and Parcel “C” (.32 ± acre). The Casa de Suisun apartment project was developed on Parcels A & B. The city ultimately built the Senior Center on Parcel “C”. In January 2020, the city sold Parcels “A” & “B” to the owners of the Casa de Suisun apartment complex.

Site
The subject site is generally rectangular in shape, however, some of the lines are slightly arced.

The area of the site is 0.320 ± acres: the northern boundary is 135.88', eastern boundary is 101.97', southern boundary is 134.27', and western boundary is 102'.

The subject site is located on the north side of Merganser Drive; it is generally level and slightly above street grade. The site is abutted on its north and east by the Casa de Suisun apartment complex property with which it shares access to and use of identified easements. The western boundary of the site is the parking lot of a multi-tenant office building, 333 Sunset Avenue.

Street frontage improvements including curbs, gutters and sidewalks are in place, which are in average condition for their 35 to 40 years of age. The Subject Property is connected to City water and sewer service, and PG&E gas and electrical services.

General Plan & Zoning
The subject property is zoned High-Density Residential 1 (RH1) which is consistent with the city’s General Plan land use element Res Hi PUD designation. The zoning is in compliance with the General Plan and a zoning change is not anticipated nor likely at this time. The building is a permitted use; however, not the highest and best use of the site, as if vacant, based on our analyses.

Easements
The subject site - Parcel “C” - is encumbered by one easement and benefits from two additional easements which encumber Parcels “A” & “B” to the east and north of the subject site, respectively.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
292
ATTACHMENT 3
293
ATTACHMENT 3
294
22 As set forth in the “Parcel Map: Lands of Suisun City,” filed September 18, 1986 in Book 30 of Parcel Maps, at Page 15, Solano County Records. All “Joint Access Easements” are described on the referenced Parcel Map located on the following page.

The subject site is encumbered by a 25-foot wide easement, “Joint Access Easement CC” in favor of Parcels “A” and “B” for access and incidental purposes, running in a north/south direction along the western boundary of the subject site. This easement runs along the rear of the nine (9) parking stalls located on the west side of the subject property and appears to provide access, and incidental purposes to the western portion of the Casa de Suisun apartment complex located on Parcel “B.”
A second easement described as “Joint Access Easement BB” in favor of Parcels “A” and “C” is located on Parcel “B” (adjacent on the north of the subject property). This easement may have been created with the intent of providing access to the nine (9) parking spaces on the eastern side of the subject property and the eight (8) parking spaces located on the northern side (or the rear) of the subject property. However, as we will explain in the “Shared Use Agreement” section below, we do not believe parking is available as described.

A third easement described as “Joint Access Easement AA” in favor of Parcels “B” and “C” appears to be located on Parcel “A”; however, we cannot determine its exact location or how it “favors” the subject Parcel “C.”
Taxes
The city of Suisun City, a public entity, is not subject to assessment by the county assessor or required to pay property taxes. Pursuant to California Proposition 13, the subject property is subject to reassessment upon a change in ownership.

Shared Use Agreement
We were told of an agreement - Shared Use Agreement - that we assume provides access to and use of parking spaces adjacent to the north (rear) and east sides of the subject property. We do not believe these parking spaces are on the subject site or part of the subject property. We believe these parking spaces are not encumbered by the aforementioned easements and are owned “in fee” by the owner of Parcel “B.” We do not believe those spaces may be used without permission from the owner of Parcel “B.” We have requested the city provide a written agreement, however, as of the date of this report have not received any agreement.

We believe the subject property has nine (9) parking spaces located on the west side of the subject site, and directly accessible from Merganser Drive. The easement that burdens the

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
295

IT IS NOT A PLAT OR SURVEY OF THE LAND DEPICTED. THIS MAP IS FU RNISHED MERELY AS A CONVENIENCE TO AID YOU IN LOCATING THE LAND INDICATED HEREON WITH REFERENCE TO STREETS AND OTHER LAND. THE COMPA NY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OCCURRING BY REASON OF RELIANCE THEREON.

NOTE: EASEMENTS DEPICTED HEREON ARE PROVIDED AS A COURTESY ONLY AND NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS TH EREOF. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A SURVEY BE OBTAINED FROM A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL TO DETER MINE ACTUAL LOCATIONS.

Placer Title Company Page 1 of 1
Preliminary title report dated as of May 15, 2023

Order Number: P-593658 Date Prepared: 05/24/2023
Property Address: 318 Merganser Drive, Suisun City, CA 94585 Assessor’s Parcel No.: 0173-010-230

LEGEND

Parcel (Fee, Property in Question)

Item No. 3 - Easement for the purpose of access, and incidental purposes September 18, 1986, in Book 30 of Parcel Maps, at Page 15 Affects as described therein

Item No. 4 - Easement for electrical facilities and incidental purposes February 2, 1987, Instrument 7898, Book 1987, Page 14159, of Official Records Said Easement cannot be determined from record

ATTACHMENT 3
296
23 subject property, “Joint Access Easement CC,” appears to provide access to Parcel “B” and appears to connect with Joint Access Easement “BB” as it burdens Parcel “B.” We do not believe either of the two easements created “...in favor of...” the subject Parcel “C” give any user - other than the owner of Parcel “B” - the right to park in the parking stalls on the north (rear) and east sides of the subject property. We believe those 17 parking spaces collectively, again the eight (8) parking stalls on the north (rear) side of the subject property or the nine (9) parking stalls on the east side of the subject property, are owned in fee by property owner of Parcel “B,” the Casa de Suisun apartment complex.

Just worth mentioning and further evidence of the existence of a shared use agreement are signs posted on the subject building facing all parking spaces, including those located on the subject property:
“PERMIT PARKING ONLY”
Senior Center Parking Only
Violators will be cited, 10.22.070 SCO
3 However, on the date of inspection of the subject property, the parking spaces were occupied by vehicles likely belonging to residents of the Casa de Suisun apartment complex. In conclusion, we believe some form of shared use agreement is key to making the senior center building a viable product to a market participant.

Flood Information
The applicable Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Insurance Rate Maps for the subject property is 06095C0457F, dated August 3, 2016. The subject does not appear to be within a FEMA Zone X. This indicates the subject is not in a high risk area that is within the 100-year flood plain, and flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards do not apply. However, we suggest any user of this report attain a FEMA Flood Map declaration to confirm the location of the flood plain in relation to the property.

Seismic Information
This area is not located in a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, although all areas of California are subject to seismic activity.
3 The “cited” section addresses “Towing of vehicles from public parking facilities”

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
297
24 Improvements
The subject site is improved with a 5,275 ± square foot single story structure built circa 1987.

The structure is configured as a public center for senior citizens. The structure features two event rooms, classrooms, an office, a kitchen, and restrooms. The structure is of wood frame construction on a concrete slab. The siding is T-111 plywood, and the roof is primarily composition shingle. This building appears to be of average quality and fair to average condition. The building has had some remodeling. During the inspection, we observed damage to the ceiling, possibly water damage, and were told by Gemma Geluz with of the City of Suisun Public Works Department (who provided us with access to the subject property and accompanied us on the inspection) that there were ADA issues that needed to be addressed as well.

The subject site has nine (9) parking stalls including one for handicap access on the west side of the building , just east of the north/south easement identified in Easements section of this report.

We believe these parking spaces are located on the subject site.

Appraising the same property for a new client
Ronald G. Garland, MAI, SRA of Garland & Salmon appraised the subject property on February 4, 2022 (date of value). The client and intended user was Ted Caldwell, the owner of the adjacent Casa de Suisun senior apartments. The city of Suisun City was also named as an intended user in that report. The assignment was to form a market value opinion of the fee simple interest in the subject property. According to that appraisal report, the city and Mr.

Caldwell had been discussing the potential of Mr. Caldwell acquiring the subject property in order to redevelop it to integrate the property in to the Casa de Suisun senior apartments.

Mr. Garland concluded the subject property improvement as a community center use fails the financially feasibility test in his highest and best use analysis, as presently improved. Mr.

Garland also concluded conversion to a retail use or an office use are also not financially feasible. Finally, Mr. Garland concluded converting the existing structure to a multifamily use is not financially feasible. According to Mr. Garland, the highest and best use of the existing structure is to demolish the improvements and make way for a multifamily development and highest and best use of the site as vacant.

Current Offer to Purchase the Subject Property
We are aware of an offer to purchase the subject property by the owner of the Casa de Suisun apartments, Ted Caldwell. In a May 25, 2023 email from Mr. Caldwell to Greg Folsom, Suisun City Manager, Mr. Caldwell offered $300,000 for the fee simple interest in the subject property.

He goes on to state, the price was determined by appraiser Ron Garland approximately one year

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
298
ATTACHMENT 3
299
25 ago. He prefers not to have any affordable requirement, as Casa de Suisun already accepts Section 8 Housing Vouchers and will continue to do so. He goes on to say for 30 years Casa de Suisun provided affordable housing in the form of 15 units of very, very low income housing to meet the State of California requirements. And finally he says, this requirement has expired and he prefers to have the ability to rent to market rate residents.

More specifically, in his offer, Mr. Caldwell will require the city to issue a building premit ot construct six (6) apartment units, some or all may be 2-bedroom units withing the existing building structure. The units must be rented to citizens 55 years and older. The project will be operated in conjunction with the existing 108 unit Casa de Suisun as one business. He plans to install wrought iron fencing with security gates around the subject property, similar to existing fencing.

Mr. Garland’s value conclusion was $300,000, for a vacant site, concluding the present improvements do not contribute value to the overall property and should be demolished to make way for a multifamily development use. We agree with Mr. Garland’s conclusion that the present improvements to do not contribute to the value of the overall property and have appraised the subject property with the hypothetical condition that the site is vacant and ready for development to a multifamily use consistent with the zoning and general plan.

Value in Use
We believe it is important to make the distinction between market value and value in use . We have already defined market value earlier in this report. To paraphrase, market value includes a willing and able seller and buyer, each acting prudently, for self interest, no undue duress to buy of sell, neither in a position to take advantage of the other. Market value is specific to a defined market. Value in use may equate to market value, however, it is conceptually different.

The concept of value in use is “The value of a property assuming a specific use, which may or may not be the property’s highest and best use on the effective date of the appraisal.” 4 We performed a market value appraisal as instructed by the client. Mr. Caldwell, however, as the owner of the adjacent parcels, namely those improved with the Casa de Suisun apartments, is not considered a typical buyer. Referring to his offer to Suisun City, he will pay $300,000 conditioned upon the city permitting him to construct six (6) apartment units, within the existing building structure. He plans to operate the additional units within the existing 108 units at (his) Casa de Suisun as one business. For a couple reasons, no other buyer (market participant) can 4The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 6th ed., Appraisal Institute

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
300
26 make this offer and make it pencil.
• It is an assemblage for Mr. Caldwell; it is worth more to him as an assemblage with the existing Casa de Suisun apartments than anyone else. Also, many conditions and terms of sale, such as permitting entitlements, that are not consistent with the as is value range of the subject property.
• Since 1987, Mr. Caldwell has ground leased the parcels upon which his 108 unit Casa de Suisun apartment complex is situated on. Any developer could construct the six apartment units on the site the same way Mr. Caldwell plans to, however, as we will discuss in our highest and best use analysis, six apartment units does not pass the legally permissable and physically possible tests, it does not pencil financially. It is not likely Mr. Caldwell will allow any other user to integrate their six units into his Casa de Suisun project; so the typical user’s six units will be stand-alone. The income generated at turnkey will likely be insufficient to generate profit. Additionally, a typical market participant would have to deal with the existing easements and access challenges they create. And as discussed, it is questionable how many parking spaces the subject property has due to lack of an enforceable shared use agreement. • In January 2020, Mr. Caldwell purchased the two parcels he has ground leased since the inception of Casa de Suisun and now owns the apartment project site in fee simple.

Recall as we discussed earlier in this report, in June 1977, the city purchased 3.51 acres and created two parcels for the apartments and a third for the subject property. Should Mr. Caldwell successfully acquire the subject property from the city, he will own all three parcels - A, B & C. As owner of all three parcels, Mr. Caldwell is not constrained by the existing access easements in fact the merger of the three properties may in effect extinguish those easements. So, Mr. Caldwell can pretty much do what he wants on the previously easement encumbered parcels subject of course to utility and other easements and city zoning and building requirements.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
301
27 HIGHEST AND BEST USE
Highest and Best Use is "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, that is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and results in the highest value."5
There are four essential steps in analyzing highest and best use: The use must be a possible use, or physically possible on the site. It must be a permissible use, or a use permissible by current zoning and other restrictions or with the reasonable probability that a change in zoning or other restrictions may occur in the future. It must be a feasible use, or the use which produces a net return to the owner of land. Finally, it must be a maximally productive use, or the use that produces the highest net return and the highest present value.

With improved properties, occasionally the highest and best use of a site, as if vacant, and the highest and best use of the property, as
structurally improved, are in conflict. When these
conflicts occur, where the descriptive use does not match the prescriptive use, the generally accepted appraisal practice is to analyze the improved properties on both its as structurally improved basis, and on the as if vacant basis.

Highest and Best Use of the Site as if Vacant
Appropriately Supported Earlier in real estate appraisal practice, the concept of "appropriately supported" was defined as "legally permissible," or simply that current zoning permitted the zoning stated use. This concept has been somewhat modified to reflect the fact that people in the marketplace will sometimes speculate that future events may permit higher uses that are not currently allowable. With this conceptual change, the term appropriately supported has replaced legally permissible in the definition of highest and best use.

The Subject Property is zoned High-Density Residential 1 (RH1) which is consistent with the City’s General Plan land use element Res Hi PUD Subject Property designation. We are not aware of any apparent imminent change in that zoning. The current improvements fall within “Allowable Uses in Residential Zones.” 6 Multifamily residential, however, is the only appropriately supported use of the subject site, as if vacant. 5 The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th ed., Appraisal Institute 6 Title 18, Zoning Code, “Allowable Uses in Residential Zones,” Table 18.08.02

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
302
28 Physically Possible. The only appropriately supported, as if vacant, use of the subject site is multifamily residential use. Multifamily residential use of the subject property is physically possible.

Financially Feasible. In accordance with the city zoning code, High-Density Residential (RH1)

20.1 to 30 dwelling units per gross acre are the primary land use. Applying the math, the subject could accommodate 6.44 to 12.8 units per gross acre (0.32 acres x 20.1 = 6.44; 0.32 acres x 30 =

12.8). In the Solano County market area most of the time small multifamily residential projects are not financially feasible. Most of the time rents are not adequate to support the cost of construction, and investors disfavor small multifamily residential because they are too small to support an onsite manger, and off site management of these small projects is fairly ineffective.

The two building improved investment property types that flourished in the Covid-impeded market are apartments and warehouses. Because of both the strength of the multifamily residential market and the limited availability of desirable alternative investments, development of small multifamily residential projects were perceived by the marketplace as financial feasible.

In the current market environs, we have not observed any significant development or demand for small in-fill multifamily sites similar the subject. It appears that until rents improve or development costs go down, the financial feasibility of multifamily development is strained.

As discussed earlier in this report, Ted Caldwell, the owner of the Casa de Suisun apartments, via email, has offered to purchase the subject property for the purpose of developing six (6) apartment units to add to his 108 unit Casa de Suisun senior apartments. His use of the subject property benefits from the onsite management which a larger project can financially support.

Mr. Caldwell’s property management benefit are part of his potential value in use benefits which do not accrue to the broader marketplace. Mr. Caldwell’s unique benefits are not part of this market driven Highest and Best Use analysis.

Maximally Productive
The maximally productive use of the Subject Property, as if vacant, is to hold and entitle the subject site for multi-family development, with the physical development tied to a stronger multifamily development marketplace cycle anticipated in the future.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
303
29 Highest and Best Use as Improved
The as structurally improved Highest and Best Use question is the viability of using the structure for its designed use, converting the structure to an alternate use, or demolishing the structure and replacing the structure. This as structurally improved analysis is subject to the same four Highest and Best Use tests of appropriately supported, Physically Possible, Financially Feasible, and finally the Maximally Productive test.

The facts and analysis leading to a reasonable Highest and Best Use conclusion easily lends itself to a bullet point highlighting of the critical thought process leading to our conclusion. The obvious existing structure uses include the designed community center use, or conversion of the structure to office, retail or multifamily residential use. • The marketplace has already demonstrated that while only 35 ye ars old, the existing structure is economically obsolete for its designed community center use. The vastly superior Joseph Nelson Community Center, and the Salvation Army Kroc Center have usurped enough demand that the subject property has already demonstrated that it cannot compete in the marketplace. Community center use of the existing structure fails the Financially Feasible test
• At some expense, it is physically possible to convert the subj ect structure to a retail use.

However, as explained in the Environs section, all retail properties in the immediate area are worth only a small fraction of their reproduction costs. All retail properties in the competitive market area suffer very large economic (a.k.a. external) obsolescence.

Additionally, 318 Merganser Drive does not have enough commercial exposure to support retail use. Conversion of the existing subject improvement to a retail use is not financially feasible.
• As pointed out throughout this report, there is inadequate par king pursuant to zoning absent an enforceable shared use agreement.
• At some expense, it is physically possible to convert the subj ect structure to an office use.

However, as explained in the Environs section, office properties in the immediate area are worth only a small fraction of their reproduction costs. Office vacancy rates next door have been 50% or greater for a couple decades. Office products in the competitive market area suffer very large economic (a.k.a. external) obsolescence. Conversion of the existing subject improvement to an office use is not financially feasible. • It is physically possible to convert the existing structure to a multifamily dwelling.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
304
30 However such a physical conversion utilizes only a small part of the existing structure, being just the structural shell. The existing plumbing and electrical systems are inadequate to support multifamily use and would require a complete replacement likely including larger capacity water sewer and electrical services.

Additionally, retrofitting necessary doors and windows in the existing building shell is much more expensive than simply framing doors and windows into newly constructed structural framing. Another factor is fitting apartment units into an existing building envelop always create floor plan compromises which impair the rentability of those units.

Another marketplace factor in regards to conversion of the existing structure to a multifamily structure is that plan then locks the property into an economic under utilization of the site for the life of the multifamily structure. The multifamily residential land values are based upon multi-story development. Multifamily residential reuse of the existing single story structure is an economic under utilization of the site which further impairs the economics of a multifamily conversion of the existing subject improvement.

Conversion of the existing improvement to a multifamily use is not financially feasible. • There does not appear to be Financially Feasible use of the no w obsolete subject structure in its market environs.

The Highest and Best Use of the existing structure is to demolish the structure to make way for the multifamily residential development and Highest and Best Use of the site, as if vacant.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
305
31 VALUATION
As discussed in the Highest and Best Use as improved section of this report, due to the lack of an enforceable agreement to share the use of parking spaces on the adjacent Casa de Suisun apartment complex, there does not appear to be a financially feasible use of the subject improvement, the former Suisun Senior Center. And as concluded in the Highest and Best Use, as if vacant, section of this report, the maximally productive use of the subject site, as if vacant, is to hold and entitle for multi-family development, with the physical development tied to a stronger multifamily development marketplace cycle anticipated in the future. As such, we will value the subject property as if vacant, without consideration to the existing building improvements.

In order to form opinions of market value for the subject property, the direct comparison approach has been used. We have searched the regional competitive market area of the subject property for residential development sites with similar physical and legal characteristics as the subject site.

As-Vacant Valuation
We have researched and analyzed five (5) comparable site sales in downtown districts of Fairfield and the city of Suisun City. Despite their differences from the subject property, these comparable data points are believed to be the best available for analysis and comparison to the subject and will be considered and analyzed on a primary basis. The sales effectively bracket a supported preliminary market value indication of the subject property.

We note that while we have considered the wider market area, the best and most applicable data points were located within the downtown areas of Fairfield and Suisun City, as they are a better representation of the subject's market.

A summary table of the comparable sales is shown on the following page, and a map showing the location of the comparable sales follows. Summaries of each comparable sale are located after the map. Additional information with regard to each sale can be found in the Addenda of this report.

We will provide a summary qualitative ranking analysis of the subject and all the comparable sales available for analysis, then discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the available sales for analysis, followed by reconciling to a preliminary market value opinion.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
306
32 COMPARABLE MULTI-FAMILY SITE SALES
SUBJECT 1 2 3 4 5
810, 830 & 848 640 525 Parcel 3
Main Street Great Jones Broadway Morgan Street Main & Solano St. Kel log St Suisun City Fairfield Fairfield Suisun City Suisun City Suisun City APN 0032-141-130 0030-173-08,
09 & 10
0030-291-090, -
100
0032-143-070,
-210
0032-142-300 0032-142-280
Sale Info
Date of Sale 01/17/18 4/ 30/2021 9/29/2021 12/21/2022 12/21/22 Doc# 0002832 48524 1021369 78651 78636
Buyer City of Fairfield Dante Archangeli Lionext Inc. Lionext Inc Seller Greg Tonnesen Javer Ruiz Suisun City Suisun City Sale Price $718,000 $301,500 $200,000 $130,000 $110,000 Cond. of Sale Arm's Length Arm's L ength Arm's Length See Remarks Se e Remarks Adjustments $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Adj. Sale $ $718,000 $301,500 $200,000 $130,000 $110,000 Adj. $/SF $21.14 $20.10 $20.05 $17.43 $17.26
Site Info
Acres 0.32 0.78 0.34 0.23 0.17 0.15
SF 13,939 33,975 15,000 9,975 7,459 6,373
Zoning HDR RH1 HO P1 HTD HLC MSMU DMU
DU/Ac. 20 to 30 8 to 35 20 to 80 6 to 18 24 to 54 25 to 54 Shape Rectangular Irregular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Irre gular Topography Generally Level Generally Level Generally Level General ly Level Generally Level Generally Level Character Finished site 3 lots, ½ b lock Corner Lot Corner Lot Corne r Lot Waterfront Intended Use Multi-Family Mixed Us e Multi-Family Mixed Use Mixed Us e Mxed Use

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
307
ATTACHMENT 3
308
33 #1 810, 830 & 848 Great Jones Street , Fairfield, Sold 1/18 for $718,000 or $21.14/SF This sale consists of three separate assessor parcel numbers and situs addresses and is located approximately two miles northwest of the subject property on the east side of Great Jones Street extending from Kentucky to Empire Street. Across Kentucky Street to the north is the Fairfield Civic Center complex including the County library and City Hall and the police station; across Great Jones Street to the west is a large two-story office building purchased in 2015 by Seneca Family of Agencies, which partners with Solano County’s Social services and Mental Health agencies along with non-profits to provide services to children and their families. Prior to Seneca’s purchase, the one-time medical offices sat vacant for four years. and one block south of the West Texas Street (“Main Street”) the main east/west commercial arterial street of Downtown Fairfield.

This sale had a development plan for 28 units of apartments with a total building size of 44,804 square feet plus city approved one on-street parking space per unit. The plan has expired. The property occupies the entire block between Kentucky and Empire streets.

This sale also is located in the Heart of Fairfield Plan, intended to be an “action plan” that focuses on tools needed to achieve the community’s desires for the Heart of Fairfield, including updates to zoning and design standards, economic and fee incentives, street and sidewalk enhancements, and infrastructure improvements.

The center parcel: 830 Great Jones has a dated single-family home still located on the site. It has 11 rooms including 6 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. The total building size is 2,156 square feet and occupied by tenants. Income from this interim use will off-set some of the carrying costs until this site in developed. The site fronting on Kentucky street is vacant and undeveloped; the site fronting on Empire is a fenced asphalt parking lot in a state of disrepair.
#2 640 Broadway Street, Fairfield, Sold 4/21 for $301,500 or $2 0.10/SF This is the sale of a 0.344 acre or 15,000 SF site located near downtown Fairfield and south of the government buildings. This lot is adjacent to a Solano County-owned parking lot. It is a corner lot with frontage on both Broadway and Jefferson Streets.

The property was previously improved but sold vacant, with some concrete slabs still in place but no improved buildings. While the location is just outside the core downtown area, the property is located within the Heart of Fairfield Specific Plan. The zoning for the site is a transit-oriented development with a focus on higher-density housing uses.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
309
34 The allowed density for the site is 20 to 80 dwelling units per gross acre, with a 60% lot coverage and building height of 65'. This property is outside the core parking district of the specific plan.

The property was actively marketed with an original list price of $375,000 for 297 days.

The broker confirmed that the property was acquired by the City of Fairfield after getting an appraisal. The property had been on the market for some time and had not sold. As such, the seller took the offer from the City. The seller confirmed that that was the best offer they had.
#3 525 Morgan Street, Suisun City, Sold 09/21for $200,000 or $20.05/SF This is the sale of a 0.23 acre site located at the southwest corner of Kellogg and Morgan Streets in the Downtown Waterfront District of the city of Suisun City. The property is reported to have a street address of 525 Morgan Street.

The site is located in the downtown parking district, and is near city parking lots on the east side of Kellogg Street. The site is zoned historical limited commercial, allowing for limited commercial uses, residential uses, and mixed uses. The zoning allows for the development of 6 to 18 units per acre, and the site is fully served and in a development ready condition.

The property has been on-and-off the market since March of 2016, with an asking price of $234,900. The broker reported a fair amount of interest but a limited number of written offers over the time it was marketed. The property was listed in 2021 with an asking price of $229,999, then dropped to $199,999. The final sales price was $200,000.

The buyer's agent confirmed the sale and said their buyer intended to develop the property with housing. They felt that the property could be developed with 2 to 4 units.

The property reportedly has suffered some market resistance during marketing due to its less preferred historic limited commercial zoning, and there was some uncertainty as to whether the site was one, or two legal parcels.
#4 Main St. & Solano St . Suisun City, Sold 12/22 for $130,000 or $17.43/SF This comparable sale is a 0.17-acre downtown parcel in Suisun City that sold off-market for a previously appraised price of $130,000. The property is located on the northeast

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
310
35 corner of Main and Solano Streets, just north of the core downtown Harbor Square area and northwest of the harbor. The property has good exposure on Main Street, providing primary access to the area.

The property is rectangular, with a long side along Main Street. It was improved with a gravel parking lot and minimal landscaping. The property is located within a parking district that allows for higher-density development and off-site parking. The zoning allows for a variety of mixed-use developments. The FEMA Flood Zone designation is a mix of AE and Zone X (shaded). This property was considered surplus by Suisun City, and the City Manager reported that they planned to sell it for some time.

In 2018 the City had the property appraised at $130,000 by a national appraisal firm. We have reviewed the report.

In early 2022, the City was in works with the buyer to sell this property as well as two other vacant lots in downtown; all are non-contiguous. The buyer reportedly planned to develop the set of properties into mixed-use developments. In the second half of 2022, the City reportedly learned that they needed to sell these surplus properties before the end of the year, or they would have to develop plans for affordable housing on each site.

While the City was already in talks with the buyer, the sales timeline was expedited to close before 2023.

As such, the property was not openly marketed prior to the sale. The proposed sale was given public comment, but there were no other interested parties at the time. The City Manager confirmed that the 2018 appraisals set the sales prices and there were no further negotiations regarding pricing. Each property was acquired separately, and no bulk discount was given.

There were no entitlements at the time of sale. The buyer owns a regional transportation company from the area and wants to invest in the region. They are not real estate developers. It is unclear if development is likely to happen in the near term. #5 Kellogg Street Suisun City, Sold 12/22 for $110,000 or $17.26 /SF This comparable sale is a 0.15-acre downtown parcel in Suisun City that sold off-market for a previously appraised price of $110,000. The property is located along the Suisun Slough and has waterfront views. The property is accessed via a non-exclusive dominant easement for public access, parking, and services. The property is well suited to benefit

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
311
36 from the waterfront location but does not have good visibility from the Kellogg Street frontage.

The property is generally rectangular and unimproved. The FEMA Flood Zone designation is Zone AE which requires significant development work to be developed.

Additionally, the property's proximity to the water results in the property being under the jurisdiction of the BCDC (Bay Conservation and Development Commission). Both the flood zone and the BCDC jurisdiction adds to the complexity and risk of potential future development of the site.

The property is located within a parking district that allows for higher-density development and off-site parking for commercial uses. The zoning allows for a variety of mixed-use developments. This property was considered surplus by Suisun City, and the City Manager reported that they planned to sell it for some time.

In 2018, the City had the property appraised at $110,000 by a national appraisal firm. We have reviewed the report.

In early 2022, the City was in works with the buyer to sell this property as well as two other vacant lots in downtown, all are non-contiguous. The buyer reportedly planned to develop the set of properties into mixed-use developments. In the second half of 2022, the City reportedly learned that they needed to sell these surplus properties before the end of the year, or they would have to develop plans for affordable housing on each site.

While the City was already in talks with the buyer, the sales timeline was expedited to close before 2023.

As such, these properties were not openly marketed prior to the sale. The proposed sale was given public comment, but there were no other interested parties at the time. The City Manager confirmed that the 2018 appraisals set the sales prices, and there were no further negotiations regarding pricing. Each property was acquired separately, and no bulk discount was given.

There were no entitlements at the time of sale. The buyer owns a regional transportation company from the area and wants to invest in the region. They are not real estate developers. It is unclear if development is likely to happen in the near term.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
312
37 QUALITATIVE SUMMARY TABLE
# Location Sale Date SF of
Land
Sales
Price/SF
Indicated Subject Value
1 830 Great Jones, Fairfield 1/17/2018 33,975 $21.14 Less than $21.1 4/SF 2 640 Broadway, Fairfield 4/30/2021 15,000 $20.10 Less than $20.10/S F 3 525 Morgan Street, Suisun City 9/29/2021 9,975 $20.05 Less than $2 0.05/SF 4 Main St. & Solano St., Suisun City 12/21/2022 7,459 $17.43 Greater than $17.43/SF 5 Kellog St., Suisun City 12/21/2022 6,373 $17.26 Greater than $17.26/SF We are generally happy with quality of the sales data available for our analysis. Two sales are located in Downtown Fairfield and three in Downtown Suisun City. These comparable sales are believed to effectively compete with the subject property. We would have preferred to have a greater number of current closed transactions, however, the limited sales available for analyses indicate the limited development demand for small infill sites in the subject CMA.

Prior to qualitative ranking and analysis, the comparable sales indicate a range of $17.26 psf to $21.14 psf, based on the 13,939 SF of the subject site, indicating a total property value in the range of $240,587 to $294,670. After qualitative ranking and analysis, the comparable sales indicate a range of $17.26 psf to $20.05 psf, or $240,587 to $279,476.

Although somewhat dated, Sale 1, consists of three assessor parcels sold in the same transaction including approvals for a 28 unit apartment complex, however, the approvals have since expired.

This sale offers other options including selling off one or more of the parcels. Maybe 28 units isn’t the most maximally production use of the site. Maybe two of the three parcels is more financially feasible. Additionally, the interim residential structure generates income to offset some of the carrying costs. This sale is more than twice the size of the subject property, however, its units per acre density is similar to the subject. This sale is located within a parking overlay district and one block from Downtown Fairfield which are favorable attributes. It is also part of the Heart of Fairfield Plan, as discussed. The indicated value for the subject based on this sale is less than $21.13 per square foot.

Sale 2 is very close in size to the subject property and is located next to the County Government Center and only 2 blocks from the West Texas “Main” Street arterial. We feel it is a better site for development of multi-family units as it is not encumbered by the easements exhibited in the subject property. Its surroundings are similar to the subject property in that it includes some older residential properties, and there are retail uses of a similar age, quality and condition nearby which are similar to the subject surroundings. Across Jefferson Street is a somewhat recently developed small multi-residential project, which is one of the newer developments in

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
313
38 the immediate vicinity. Additionally, this sale is located in the Heart of Fairfield Specific Plan (as Sale 1 is). Linkages to Highway 12 are also convenient and nearby. This indicated value for the subject based on this sale is less than $20.10 per square foot.

Sale 3 is located in Downtown Suisun City in its Waterfront District, one block off Main Street and also one block from the waterfront. Similar to Sale 2, it is better suited for development to a multi-family or mixed use. However, its smaller size may limit its uses. Nearby uses include restaurants, office buildings and residential single-family dwellings. This sale is rectangle and level site. It fronts on Morgan Street which is two-way however somewhat narrow. Its density is less than the subject property. However, it is a level site with access from two streets. This indicated value for the subject based on this sale is less than $20.05 per square foot.

Sale 4 is located on the corner of Main Street and Solano Street, a one way street. Directly across Main Street are commercial buildings dating back to the early 1900s. Across Solano Street is a newer commercial and office building including which has experienced vacancies since it was completed in 2008. This is a rectangular and level site with density similar to the subject site. Despite this sale being a little more than one-half the size of the subject site it is a pretty good indicator of value for the subject. It has good visibility and access. This indicated value for the subject based on this sale is greater than $17.43 per square foot.

Sale 5 is located basically on the water-front, however, it is accessed via an easement. It is in the same vicinity as Sales 3 and 4, however, its location is less desitable than those sales. This sale is less than half the size of the subject and has an irregular shape may make development a challenge. This indicated value for the subject based on this sale is greater than $17.26 per square foot.

In our opinion, we were pleased with the data available for our analysis, and the best sales available for analysis in the competitive market area of the subject indicate support for a market value in the rounded range of $18 per SF to $19 per SF.

Based on its total size of 13,939 square feet this indicates support for a subject property value in the range of in the range of $250,902 to $264,841. Calculations are shown below. 13,939 SF x $18 per SF = $250,902
13,939 SF x $19 per SF = $264,841

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
314
39 Due to the current high interest rate environs dampening demand for new development, and the lack of observed development of similar sites in the Fairfield/Suisun competitive market area of the subject property, we are inclined to reconcile to the lower end of the indicated range.

So as not to suggest a degree of precision that is not inherent in this analysis, nor in the marketplace the subject property competes within, it is appropriate to round the market value conclusion of the subject. After all considerations, a rounded market value opinion of $250,000 is opined for the subject property on the date of value.

MARKET VALUE OPINION
MAY 31, 2023
318 MERGANSER DRIVE
$250,000

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
315
40 EXPOSURE TIME
The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) require that opinions of market value be expressed in relation to exposure time. Exposure time is defined as:

1. The time a property remains on the market.

2. The estimated length of time the property interest being appr aised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal; a retrospective estimate based on an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market.
7 Exposure time is always presumed to occur prior to the effective date of the appraisal. The overall concept of reasonable exposure encompasses not only adequate, sufficient and reasonable time but also adequate, sufficient and reasonable effort.

Exposure time is different for various types of real estate and value ranges and under various market conditions. Market value estimates imply that an adequate marketing effort and reasonable time for exposure occurred prior to the effective date of the appraisal.

Therefore based more on our experience in the marketplace, given the data from the market of similar transaction, and the current position the market is in related to the economic cycle, our opinion is the subject would have had to have been offered for sale for approximately 12 months prior to the date of value.
7 Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 7th ed., Appraisal Institute

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
316
41 CERTIFICATION
We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief

1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.

2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.

3. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved.

4. We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment.

5. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon dev eloping or reporting predetermined results.

6. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contin gent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.

7. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice.

8. We have made a personal inspection of the property that is th e subject of this report, unless noted otherwise in the SCOPE OF WORK.

9. We have observed the comparable properties during our previous work in the area or have completed aerial inspections through Google Maps or the local MLS service.

10. No one provided significant prof essional assistance to the persons signing this report.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
317
ATTACHMENT 3
318
Front of subject property shot from across Merganser Dr. facing north.

East side of subject property shot from Merganser Dr. facing north, Casa de Suisun senior apartments on the right of the picture, parking spaces on the left are not usable due to lack of a shared parking agreement

SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS

GARLAND &
SALMON318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
319
West side of the subject property shot from Merganser Dr. facing north, parking spaces on the right are located on the subject property Shot of the easement that encumbers the subject property, running along the fence in a north/south direction; the parking on the right of the picture belongs to the subject property

SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS

GARLAND &
SALMON318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
320
Shot of the rear of the subject property, parking spaces are not usable due to lack of a shared parking agreement
Looking south along the east side of the subject property showing parking spaces that are not usable due to lack of a shared parking access agreement

SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS

GARLAND &
SALMON318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
321
This sign is located on all sides of the subject building facing the parking spaces “Permit Parking Only”
Interior shot of one of the rooms in the subject improvement

SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS

GARLAND &
SALMON318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
322
Land Sale No. 1
Property Identification
Record ID 1485
Property Type Downtown lot, Mixed use
Address 810, 830, 848 Great Jones, Fairfield, Solano County, California 94533 Location Heart of Fairfield Specific Plan
Tax ID 0030-173-080, -090, -100
Sale Data
Grantor Seneca Family of Agencies
Grantee Amp Great Jones Investment LLC
Sale Date January 17, 2018
Deed Book/Page 2832
Property Rights Fee Simple
Conditions of Sale Arms Length
Financing $328,000 Private Lender; 46% LTV
Verification Broker; Other sources: MLS, Public Record, Confirmed by Database Administrator
Sale Price $718,000
Cash Equivalent $718,000
Land Data
Zoning HO P1 - Heart of Fairfield, Parking District
Topography Generally level
Utilities All urban services available
Shape Rectangular
Parking Downtown Parking District
Land Size Information
Gross Land Size 0.780 Acres or 33,977 SF
28 Front Footage Great Jones Street; Kentucky Street; Empire Street; Indicators
Sale Price/Gross Acre $920,513
Sale Price/Gross SF $21.13
Sale Price/ Unit $25,643

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
323
Remarks
This sale consists of three separate assessor parcel numbers and situs addresses and is located approximately two miles northwest of the subject property on the east side of Great Jones Street extending from Kentucky to Empire Street. Across Kentucky Street to the north is the Fairfield Civic Center complex including the County library and City Hall and the police station; across Great Jones Street to the west is a large two-story office building purchased in 2015 by Seneca Family of Agencies, which partners with Solano County’s Social services and Mental Health agencies along with non- profits to provide services to children and their families. Prior to Seneca’s purchase, the one-time medical offices sat vacant for four years. and one block south of the West Texas Street (“Main Street”) the main east/west commercial arterial street of Downtown Fairfield.

This sale had a development plan for 28 units of apartments with a total building size of 44,804 square feet plus city approved one on-street parking space per unit. The plan has expired. The property occupies the entire block between Kentucky and Empire streets. This sale also is located in the Heart of Fairfield Plan, intended to be an “action plan” that focuses on tools needed to achieve the community’s desires for the Heart of Fairfield, including updates to zoning and design standards, economic and fee incentives, street and sidewalk enhancements, and infrastructure improvements.

The center parcel: 830 Great Jones has a dated single-family home still located on the site. It has 11 rooms including 6 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. The total building size is 2,156 square feet and occupied by tenants. Income from this interim use will off-set some of the carrying costs until this site in developed. The site fronting on Kentucky street is vacant and undeveloped; the site fronting on Empire is a fenced asphalt parking lot in a state of disrepair.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
324
Land Sale No. 2
Property Identification
Record ID 1473
Property Type Commercial
Address 640 Broadway Street, Fairfield, Solano County, California 94533 Location 640 Broadway Street
Tax ID 0030-291-090, -100
Sale Data
Grantor Greg Tonnesen
Grantee City of Fairfield
Sale Date April 30, 2021
Deed Book/Page 48524
Property Rights Fee Simple
Marketing Time 297 days
Conditions of Sale Arm's Length
Financing Cash to Seller
Verification Greg Tonnesen; April 20, 2023; Dylon Baker, 707-330-0152, April 24, 2023; Other sources: MLS, Confirmed by Matt Atwood
Sale Price $301,500
Cash Equivalent $301,500
Land Data
Zoning HTD, Commercial
Topography Level
Utilities Available
Shape Rectangular
Land Size Information
Gross Land Size 0.344 Acres or 15,000 SF
Indicators
Sale Price/Gross Acre $875,556
Sale Price/Gross SF $20.10

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
325
Remarks
This is the sale of a 0.34 acre or 15,000 SF site located near downtown Fairfield and south of the government buildings. This lot is adjacent to a Solano County-owned parking lot. It has frontage on both Broadway and Jefferson Streets.

The property was previously improved but sold vacant, with some concrete slabs still in place but no improved buildings. While the location is just outside the core downtown area, the property is located within the Heart of Fairfield Specific Plan. The zoning for the site is a transit-oriented development with a focus on higher-density housing uses. The allowed density for the subject is 18 to 65 dwelling units per gross acre. This property is outside the core parking district of the specific plan.

The property was actively marketed with an original list price of $375,000 for 297 days. The broker confirmed that the property was acquired by the City of Fairfield after getting an appraisal. The property had been on the market for some time and had not sold. As such, the seller took the offer from the City. The seller confirmed that that was the best offer they had.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
326
Land Sale No. 3
Property Identification
Record ID 1369
Property Type Commercial/residential
Address 525 Morgan Street, Suisun City, Solano County, California 94585 Location Downtown Waterfront District
Tax ID 0032-143-070, -210
Sale Data
Grantor Javer Ruiz
Grantee Dante Archangeli
Sale Date September 29, 2021
Deed Book/Page 1021369
Property Rights Fee Simple
Marketing Time 22+ Months
Conditions of Sale Arm's Length
Financing Cash to Seller
Verification Michelle Perez; 702-208-2557, April 12, 2023; Other sources: MLS, Public Record, Confirmed by Matt Atwood
Sale Price $200,000
Cash Equivalent $200,000
Land Data
Zoning Historic Limited Commercial; HLC, Downtown Commercial Topography Generally level
Utilities All avaialable
Shape Rectangular
Land Size Information
Gross Land Size 0.229 Acres or 9,975 SF
Front Footage Kellogg Street; Morgan Street;
Indicators
Sale Price/Gross Acre $873,362
Sale Price/Gross SF $20.05

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
327
Remarks
This is the sale of a 0.23 acre site located at the southwest corner of Kellogg Street and Morgan Street in the Downtown Waterfront District of the city of Suisun City. The property is reported to have a street address of 525 Morgan Street.

The site is located in the downtown parking district, and is near city parking lots on the east side of Kellogg Street. The site is zoned historical limited commercial, allowing for limited commercial uses, residential uses, and mixed uses. The zoning allows for the development of 6 to 18 units per acre, and the site is fully served and in a development ready condition.

The property has been on-and-off the market since March of 2016, with an asking price of $234,900.

The broker reported a fair amount of interest but a limited number of written offers over the time it was marketed. The property was listed in 2021 with an asking price of $229,999, then dropped to $199,999.

The final sales price was $200,000.

The buyer's agent confirmed the sale and said their buyer intended to develop the property with housing. They felt that the property could be developed with 2 to 4 units.

The property reportedly has suffered some market resistance during marketing due to its less preferred historic limited commercial zoning, and there was some uncertainty as to whether the site was one, or two legal parcels.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
328
Land Sale No. 4
Property Identification
Record ID 1474
Property Type Commercial, Mixed use
Property Name Parcel 3
Address Suisun City, Solano County, California
Location Main St. & Solano St.

Tax ID 0032-142-300
Latitude, Longitude W38.238751, N-122.040478
Sale Data
Grantor City of Suisun City
Grantee Lionext Inc.

Sale Date December 21, 2022
Deed Book/Page 78651
Property Rights Fee Simple
Marketing Time None
Conditions of Sale See Remarks
Financing Cash to Seller
Verification Jim Bermudez; 707-421-7333, May 01, 2023; Other sources: City Manager, Confirmed by Matt Atwood
Sale Price $130,000 Based on Appraisal
Cash Equivalent $130,000
Land Data
Zoning MSMU, Downtown Commercial
Topography Level
Utilities Available
Shape Rectangular
Parking Parking District
Flood Info AE & X
Land Size Information
Gross Land Size 0.171 Acres or 7,459 SF
Front Footage Main St.; Solano St.;
Indicators
Sale Price/Gross Acre $759,190
Sale Price/Gross SF $17.43

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
329
Remarks
This comparable sale is a 0.17-acre downtown parcel in Suisun City that sold off-market for a previously appraised price of $130,000. The property is located on the northeast corner of Main Street and Solano Street, just north of the core downtown Harbor Square area and northwest of the harbor.

The property has good exposure on Main Street, providing primary access to the area.

The property is rectangular, with a long side along Main Street. It was improved with a gravel parking lot and minimal landscaping. The property is located within a parking district that allows for higher- density development and off-site parking. The zoning allows for a variety of mixed-use developments.

The FEMA Flood Zone designation is a mix of AE and Zone X(shaded). This property was considered surplus by Suisun City, and the City Manager reported that they planned to sell it for some time.

In 2018 the City had the property appraised at $130,000 by a national appraisal firm. We have reviewed the report.

In early 2022, the City was in works with the buyer to sell this property as well as two other vacant lots in downtown, all are non-contiguous. The buyer reportedly planned to develop the set of properties into mixed-use developments. In the second half of 2022, the City reportedly learned that they needed to sell these surplus properties before the end of the year, or they would have to develop plans for affordable housing on each site. While the City was already in talks with the buyer, the sales timeline was expedited to close before 2023.

As such, these properties were not openly marketed prior to the sale. The proposed sale was given public comment, but there were no other interested parties at the time. The City Manager confirmed that the 2018 appraisals set the sales prices and there were no further negotiations regarding pricing.

Each property was acquired separately, and no bulk discount was given.

There were no entitlements at the time of sale. The buyer owns a regional transportation company from the area and wants to invest in the region. They are not real estate investors or developers. It is unclear if development is likely to happen in the near term.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
330
Land Sale No. 5
Property Identification
Record ID 1475
Property Type Commercial, Mixed use
Property Name Parcel 5
Address Suisun City, Solano County, California
Location Kellogg Street
Tax ID 0032-142-280
Latitude, Longitude W38.238175, N-122.039128
Sale Data
Grantor City of Suisun City
Grantee Lionext Inc.

Sale Date December 21, 2022
Deed Book/Page 78636
Property Rights Fee Simple
Marketing Time None
Conditions of Sale See Remarks
Financing Cash to Seller
Verification Jim Bermudez; 707-421-7333, May 01, 2023; Other sources: City Manager, Confirmed by Matt Atwood
Sale Price $110,000 Based on Appraisal
Cash Equivalent $110,000
Land Data
Zoning DMU, Downtown Commercial
Topography Level
Utilities Available
Shape Rectangular
Parking Parking District
Flood Info AE
Land Size Information
Gross Land Size 0.146 Acres or 6,373 SF
Indicators
Sale Price/Gross Acre $751,859
Sale Price/Gross SF $17.26

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
331
Remarks
This comparable sale is a 0.15-acre downtown parcel in Suisun City that sold off-market for a previously appraised price of $110,000. The property is located along the Suisun Slough and has waterfront views. The property is accessed via a non-exclusive dominant easement for public access, parking, and services. The property is well suited to benefit from the waterfront location but does not have good visibility from the Kellogg Street frontage.

The property is generally rectangular and unimproved. The FEMA Flood Zone designation is Zone AE which requires significant development work to be developed. Additionally, the property’s proximity to the water results in the property being under the jurisdiction of the BCDC (Bay Conservation and Development Commission). Both the flood zone and the BCDC jurisdiction adds to the complexity and risk of potential future development of the site.

The property is located within a parking district that allows for higher-density development and off-site parking. The zoning allows for a variety of mixed-use developments. This property was considered surplus by Suisun City, and the City Manager reported that they planned to sell it for some time.

In 2018, the City had the property appraised at $110,000 by a national appraisal firm. We have reviewed the report.

In early 2022, the City was in works with the buyer to sell this property as well as two other vacant lots in downtown, all are non-contiguous. The buyer reportedly planned to develop the set of properties into mixed-use developments. In the second half of 2022, the City reportedly learned that they needed to sell these surplus properties before the end of the year, or they would have to develop plans for affordable housing on each site. While the City was already in talks with the buyer, the sales timeline was expedited to close before 2023.

As such, these properties were not openly marketed prior to the sale. The proposed sale was given public comment, but there were no other interested parties at the time. The City Manager confirmed that the 2018 appraisals set the sales prices and there were no further negotiations regarding pricing.

Each property was acquired separately, and no bulk discount was given.

There were no entitlements at the time of sale. The buyer owns a regional transportation company from the area and wants to invest in the region. They are not real estate investors or developers. It is unclear if development is likely to happen in the near term.

GARLAND &
SALMON
318 Merganser Dr.- Suisun City; 05/23 #223507
ATTACHMENT 3
332
CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 1 of 21 ends
← All documents from this meeting