Agenda packet — Suisun City City Council, June 16, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

CITY COUNCIL
Alma Hernandez, Mayor
Jenalee Dawson, Mayor Pro Tem
Amit Pal, Councilmember
Parise Shepherd, Councilmember
Princess Washington, Councilmember

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

A G E N D A

REGULAR MEETING OF THE SUISUN CITY COUNCIL,

SUISUN CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY,

AND SUISUN CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 2026
5:00 PM

Suisun City Council Chambers - 701 Civic Center Boulevard - Suisun City, California

.
5:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION
6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING

MEETINGS ARE HELD IN-PERSON, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IS ALSO AVAILABLE VIA ZOOM

ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION:

WEBSITE: https://zoom.us/join
MEETING ID:

872 4423 0177
CALL IN PHONE NUMBER: (707) 438-1720

REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING BY EMAILING [email protected] (PRIOR TO 4 PM), VIA WEBSITE, OR ZOOM CALL IN PHONE NUMBER (707) 438-1720
(If attending the meeting via phone press *9 to raise your hand and *6 to unmute/mute for public comment.) (Next Ord. No. – 825)
(Next City Council Res. No. 2026 – 67)
Next Suisun City Council Acting as Successor Agency Res. No. SA2026 - 05) (Next Housing Authority Res. No. HA2026 – 05)

5:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hernandez

ROLL CALL
Council / Board Members

1 1.

PERSONNEL MATTERS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) et seq. the Suisun City Council will hold a Closed Session for the purpose of :

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION
Title: City Manager

2. City Manager Update - (Prebula: [email protected]).

3. City Attorney Report - (Enright).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION
(Any items on the closed session agenda that might be a conflict of interest to any Councilmembers / Boardmembers should be identified at this time.)

PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED SESSION
(In accordance with Section 54956(a), public comments are limited to items on this closed session agenda, and to no more than 3 minutes unless allowable by the Mayor/Chair. Speaker cards are available on the table near the entry of the meeting room and should be given to the City Clerk. By law, no prolonged discussion or action may be taken on any item raised during the comment period.)

CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54950 the Suisun City Council will hold a Closed Session for the Purpose of:

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION (City Manager Conference Room, City Hall)

6:00 RECONVENE OPEN SESSION

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hernandez

ROLL CALL
Council / Board Members

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Announcement of Actions Taken, if any in Closed Session.

APPROVAL OF REORDERING OF AGENDA

CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION
(Any items on the regular meeting agenda that might be a conflict of interest to any Councilmembers / Boardmembers should be identified at this time.)

REPORTS (Informational items only.)

PRESENTATIONS/APPOINTMENTS
(Presentations, Awards, Proclamations, Appointments).

2 4.

Proclamation Proclaiming the Month of June 2026 to be "Pride Month" - (Hernandez:
[email protected]).

5. Proclamation Proclaiming June 19, 2026 to be celebrated as "Juneteenth National Independence Day" - (Hernandez: [email protected]).

6. Proclamation Honoring Colonel Patrick Brady-Lee for His Distinguished Military Service and Retirement - (Hernandez: [email protected]).

7. Presentation by Solano County Older & Disabled Adult Services on the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Program and Available Community Resource.

City Council

8. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Authorizing the Purchase of the Sewer Line Rapid Assessment Tool (SL-RAT) - (Vue: [email protected]).

9. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Approving and Authorizing the Recordation of the Final Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center – (Vue: [email protected]).

10. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Accepting the T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project as Complete and Authorizing the City Manager to Record the Notice of Completion for the Project - (Vue: [email protected]).

11. Council Adoption of Council Resolution 2026-___: Intent to Annex Territory to Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein (Suisun City Dental) - (Vue: [email protected]).

12. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Consultant Contract on the City’s Behalf with Calpo Hom & Dong Architects for the Police and Fire Department Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study - (Vue:
[email protected]).

13. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-__: Authorizing the City Manager to Accept Downtown Revitalization Grant Funds in the Amount of $8,625 from California Forever for the Extension of Waterfront Tree Lighting Improvements - (Prebula: [email protected])

14. Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Declaring an Emergency and Authorizing the Immediate Repair and Replacement of the Police Department Roof and Parapets without Competitive Bidding Pursuant to the Public Contract Code Section 22035 and 22050 - (Vue:
[email protected]).

Proclamations Presented

Presentations Not Presented

Presentations

PUBLIC COMMENT
(Request by citizens to discuss any matter under our jurisdiction other than an item posted on this agenda per California Government Code §54954.3. Comments are limited to no more than 3 minutes unless allowable by the Mayor/Chair. Speaker cards are available on the table near the entry of the meeting room and should be given to the City Clerk. By law, no prolonged discussion or action may be taken on any item raised during the public comment period, although informational answers to questions may be given and matters may be referred for placement on a future agenda.)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
(Comments are limited to no more than 3 minutes)

CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent calendar items requiring little or no discussion may be acted upon with one motion. 3 Joint City Council / Suisun City Council Acting as Successor Agency

15. Council/Agency Approval of May
2026 Accounts Payable and Payroll Warrants - (Luna:
[email protected])

City Council

16. HEARING:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Placing Liens for Unpaid Waste Collection Service Charges on Certain Lands Situated in the City of Suisun City, County of Solano, State of California - (Luna: [email protected]).

City Council

17. Conduct a Public Hearing, Approve Final Engineer’s Report, and Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments for Maintenance Assessment Districts - (Vue: [email protected]). a
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-__: Amending and/or Approving the Final Engineer’s Annual Levy Reports for the Suisun City Maintenance Assessment Districts for FY 2026-27; and
b
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-__: Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Suisun City Maintenance Assessment Districts for FY 2026-27.

18. Conduct a Public Hearing, Approve Final Engineer’s Report, and Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments for the McCoy Creek Parking Benefit Assessment District - (Vue:
[email protected]).
a
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Amending and/or Approving the Final Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the McCoy Creek Parking Benefit Assessment District for FY 2026-27; and
b
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the McCoy Creek Parking Benefit Assessment District for FY 2026-27.

19. City Council Approve the following Actions Necessary to Amend the Contract between the City of Suisun City and the Public Employees’ Retirement System to Implement Cost Sharing in Accordance with Government Code Section 20516 - (Penland:
[email protected]).
a
.

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-__: Approve an Amendment of the Contract Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City Council of the City of Suisun City – CalPERS ID 2298323828. b
.

Introduction of the Ordinance No. __: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Suisun City Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract Between the City Council of the City of Suisun City and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS).

Joint City Council / Suisun City Council Acting as Successor Agency/ Housing Authority

GENERAL BUSINESS

PUBLIC HEARING
4 20.

Presentation and Adoption of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Budget - (Prebula:
[email protected]).

COUNCIL UPDATES

INFORMATIONAL REPORTS: (Non-Discussion Items)

ADJOURNMENT
Public Access To Agenda Documents
A complete packet of information containing staff reports and exhibits related to each item for the open session of this meeting, and provided to the City Council, are available for public review at least 72 hours prior to a Council/Agency/Authority Meeting at Suisun City Hall 701 Civic Center Blvd., Suisun City. Agenda related writings or documents provided to a majority of the Council/Board/Commissioners less than 72 hours prior to a Council/Agency/Authority meeting related to an agenda item for the open session of this meeting will be made available for public inspection during normal business hours. An agenda packet is also located at the entrance to the Council Chambers during the meeting for public review. The city may charge photocopying charges for requested copies of such documents. To the extent feasible, the agenda packet is available for online public viewing on the City’s website: https://www.suisun.com/Government/City-

Council/Agendas The City Council/Agency/Authority hopes to conclude its public business by 10:00 p.m. No new items will be taken up after 10:00 p.m., unless so moved by a majority of the City Council, and any items remaining will be agendized for the next meeting. The agendas have been prepared with the hope that all items scheduled will be discussed within the time allowed.

Accommodations
If you require an accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (707) 421-7302 or [email protected]. The City’s reasonable accommodation policy is available for review on the City’s website at www.suisun.com/government/city-council/, you may request an electronic copy or have a copy mailed to you. Please note that for accommodations that are not readily available, you must make your request as soon as you can prior to the time of the meeting.

Decorum
All participants are expected to conduct themselves with mutual respect. Conduct that disrupts meetings will be addressed in accordance with Section 54957.95 of the Government Code.

Ordinances
Ordinances are city laws contained in the Suisun City Municipal Code. Enacting a new city law or changing an existing one is a two-step process. Government Code 36934 provides, except when, after reading the title, further reading is waived by regular motion adopted by majority vote all ordinances shall be read in full either at the time of introduction or passage; provided, however, that a reading of the title or ordinance shall not be required if the title is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance is made available to the public online and in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage.

Certification Of Posting
Agendas for regular and special meetings are posted in accordance with the Brown Act at Suisun City Hall, 701 Civic Center Boulevard, Suisun City, CA. Agendas may be posted at other Suisun City locations including:

5 Suisun City Fire Station, 621 Pintail Drive, Suisun City, CA; Joe Nelson Center, 611 Village Drive, Suisun City, CA;
Harbor Master Office, 800 Kellogg Street, Suisun City, CA.

I, Ashley Nash, Management Analyst II for the City of Suisun City, declare under penalty of perjury that the above agenda was posted and available for review, in compliance with the Brown Act. 6 7

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
8 9

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
10 11

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
12 6/10/2026
1 In‐Home Supportive Services
County of Solano

VANG XIONG

SOCIAL SERVICES PROGRAM COORDINATOR
JUNE 16, 2026
Healthy People – Healthy Community
In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
History & Structure
Program Background
• Regulated by California Department of Social Services (CDSS), but administered by California counties • Established statewide
Funding Structure
• Cost-sharing between Federal, State, and Counties
Program Options (tailored to different eligibility/care-need groups) • Community First Choice Option (CFCO)
• Personal Care Services Program (PCSP)
• IHSS Plus Option (IPO)
• IHSS Residual (IHSSR)
Healthy People – Healthy Community
1 2
13 6/10/2026
2 In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Overview
What is IHSS?
• A Medi-Cal benefit aimed at helping low-income elderly (aged 65+), disabled adults (aged 18-64), and children with disabilities to remain safely at home
• Pays for a range of in-home assistance (domestic services, personal care services, and supervision)
Healthy People – Healthy Community
In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Eligibility Requirements
Who Qualifies?
• Medi-Cal eligible
• Age 65+, disabled adult (18-64), or a child with disabilities • CA resident living in own home within Solano County
• U.S. Citizen or lawful permanent resident
• Must have limitations in activities of daily living requiring assistance to remain safely at home
Healthy People – Healthy Community
3 4
14 6/10/2026
3 In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Covered Services
Healthy People – Healthy Community
Personal Care Services:
• Respiration
• Bowel & Bladder Care
• Feeding
• Routine Bed Baths
• Dressing
• Menstrual Care
• Ambulation
• Transfer
• Bathing, Oral Hygiene, and Grooming
• Rubbing Skin, Repositioning, Range of Motion
• Care and Assistance w/Prosthesis
• Accompaniment to Medical Appointments
Domestic & Related Services:
• Domestic Cleaning
• Preparation of Meals
• Meal Cleanup
• Laundry
• Shopping for Food
• Other Shopping & Errands
Paramedical Services
Protective Supervision
Others:
• Accompaniment to Alternative Resources
• Heavy Cleaning
• Yard Hazard Abatement
• Removal of Snow, Ice
• Teaching & Demonstration
In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Eligibility Assessment
Application Steps

1. Submit IHSS Referral via phone or SOC 295 Application for IHSS

2. Submit a completed Health Care Certification (SOC 873)

3. Complete an in-home assessment with a County Social Worker Healthy People – Healthy Community
5 6
15 6/10/2026
4 In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Post-Application Process
Assessment
• County Social Worker assesses need and eligibility
• Notification of Approval/Denial through Notice of Action (NOA) letter
Healthy People – Healthy Community
In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Approval/Denial
Approved
• Notice of Action letter with Approval Language
• Identified authorize services and weekly hours
• Summary of monthly authorized hours
Denied
• NOA letter with explanation of denial for IHSS
Healthy People – Healthy Community
7 8
16 6/10/2026
5 In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Hiring a Care Provider
Care provider
• Can be Family members, Friends, Neighbors, or care providers through the Public Authority (PA) Registry
Parent provider of minor Recipient
• A parent is eligible to be the IHSS care provider for their minor recipient All Care Providers must complete IHSS Provider Orientation, submit the necessary documents, and clear background check.

Healthy People – Healthy Community
In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
How to Apply in Solano County
Telephone
• IHSS Referral Line: (707) 784-8259 ext. 1 (Mon-Fri, 8AM-5PM; closed 12-1PM) Mail/Fax
• Download and Complete SOC 295 Application for IHSS
• Mail: 275 Beck Ave., MS 5-110, Fairfield, CA 94533
• Fax: (707) 784-2440
Office
• Download and Complete SOC 295 Application for IHSS
• Drop off Location: 275 Beck Ave., Fairfield, Ca 94533 Healthy People – Healthy Community
9 10
17 6/10/2026
6 In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)
Q&A
Questions?
Healthy People – Healthy Community
11 18
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

June 16, 2026

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Authorizing the Purchase of the Sewer Line Rapid Assessment Tool (SL-RAT).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no impact to the General Fund resulting from this purchase. Sufficient funding is available in the Sewer Maintenance Fund (F185). The vendor's quote totals $34,910 and excludes sales tax, duties, and other applicable government charges. To ensure full cost coverage, staff is requesting authorization for a not-to-exceed purchase amount of $40,000.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Sustainability and Stewardship.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Suisun City maintains about 35 miles of sewer lines that are 10 inches or smaller to ensure a reliable collection system, while the Fairfield Suisun Sewer District maintains the larger lines and provides wastewater treatment. System maintenance requires ongoing evaluation to prevent sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and ensure system reliability. Traditional methods of detecting and assessing sewer blockages—such as CCTV inspections and pre-cleaning—are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly.

The Sewer Line Rapid Assessment Tool (SL-RAT) is a proprietary, portable, acoustic-based tool designed to identify blockages in gravity-fed sewer lines quickly and without requiring flow contact.

The SL-RAT allows a two-person crew to assess 10,000–20,000 linear feet of sewer lines per day.

Assessment results are provided as a blockage score between 0 and 10, enabling clear prioritization of cleaning and maintenance activities.

STAFF REPORT:

The SL-RAT provides the City with several operational advantages:

Rapid evaluation of sewer line segments, typically completed in three minutes or less.

Numerical blockage scoring (0–10) to identify and prioritize segments requiring cleaning or additional inspection.

Reduction in unnecessary cleaning activities—national data indicates that approximately 72% of sewer lines do not require cleaning after SL-RAT screening.

Integration with the SL-DOG cloud platform, allowing staff to track, map, and export assessment data, including compatibility with GIS systems.

The proposed purchase includes optional accessories and virtual training to ensure full implementation and staff proficiency. InfoSense, Inc. is the sole manufacturer of the SL-RAT, and RH Borden and Company is the exclusive authorized service provider and representative for California.

Staff recommends purchasing one SL-RAT standard package, optional accessories, and virtual training for a total cost not-to-exceed $40,000.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026- ___: Authorizing the Purchase of the Sewer Line Rapid Assessment Tool (SL-RAT). 19 PREPARED BY:

Amanda Dum, Management Analyst II
REVIEWED BY:

Nouae Vue, Public Works Director & City
Engineer
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 2026-___: Authorizing the Purchase of the Sewer Line Rapid Assessment Tool (SL- RAT).

2. SL-RAT Purchase Quote.
20 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY

AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF THE SEWER LINE RAPID ASSESSMENT TOOL (SL-RAT®)
WHEREAS, the City of Suisun City maintains about 35 miles of sewer lines that are 10 inches or smaller to ensure a reliable collection system, while the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District maintains the larger lines and provides wastewater treatment; and WHEREAS, routine monitoring and maintenance help keep the sewer system functioning properly and play a critical role in preventing sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and ensuring system reliability; and
WHEREAS, the Sewer Line Rapid Assessment Tool (SL-RAT®) provides a fast, non- invasive, and cost-effective method for identifying blockages in gravity-fed sewer lines; and WHEREAS, the SL-RAT® allows City staff to reduce unnecessary sewer line cleaning which improve efficiency and allows for better prioritize maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, InfoSense, Inc. is the sole manufacturer of the SL-RAT®, and RH Borden and Company is the exclusive authorized representative and service provider in California; and WHEREAS, the total cost for the SL-RAT® equipment, accessories, training, and shipping is $34,910.00 this amount does not include sales tax and a not to exceed purchase amount of $40,000.00 is being requested to ensure the purchase of this unit can be completed without returning to Council for additional approvals; and WHEREAS, funding for this purchase is available in the Sewer Maintenance Fund (F185);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Suisun City hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the purchase of the SL-RAT® equipment package and associated optional components in an amount not to exceed $40,000.00.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of June 2026.

Anita Skinner
City Clerk
21 Cover Letter

To Nouae Vue, Suisun City,

RH Borden is pleased to provide the following quote the purchase of a Sewer Line - Rapid Assessment Tool (SL-RAT). Please ﬁnd the following attached:

1.Quotation 2025-1204P1-AC for purchase of the SL-RAT

2.Information about Acoustic Assessment

3.Sole Source Letter
Please note that the quotation includes an optional training from Infosense (Line 5). I strongly urge you to include this training and make good use of this. As I mentioned in our demo, there are signiﬁcant differences between most cities use the tool and the way RH Borden uses it. This training will be very useful in setting Suisun City up for success.

Additional information about the SL-RAT can be found on the Infosense website.

We are excited to provide this tool to you and are committed to helping Suisun move to a world of condition-based maintenance. Please send me any questions or requests.

Respectfully,

Kwin Peterson
Northern California Manager
RH Borden and Company
3166 Half Dome Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94566
415-747-0100
22 Date: 12/04/25
Quote #: 2025-1204P1-AC
Billing and Payment Address: 8116 South Tryon St, Suite B3-203, Charlotte, NC 28273 Prepared for: State/Prov Contact Phone # Fax # Email
CA Nouae Vue 707-421-7340 [email protected]
Price List: US Price List
Job Title Phone # Email
CEO 336-302-0164 [email protected]
Terms and Conditions
Shipment Terms: FOB Your Dock
Credit Terms: Net 30
Effective From: 12/04/25
Valid Through: 02/02/26
Line# Part Number Description Qty. Unit of
Measure Price Net Price Extended Price
1 SL-RAT Standard Package* 1 ea 33,200.00$ 33,200.00$ 33,200.00$ 2 2nd Battery Charger (Optional) 1 ea 195.00$ 195.00$ 195.00$ 3 Safety Yellow Foam Frame Cushion (Optional) 1 set 230.00$ 230.00$ 230.00$ 4 Protective Control Box Cover (Optional) 1 set 145.00$ 145.00$ 145.00$ 5 Virtual Training via Microsoft Teams (Optional)** 1 ea 675.00$ 675.00$ 675.00$ 6 Shipping & Handling** 1 ea 465.00$ 465.00$ 465.00$ *Price includes storage bag, one battery charger, one-year limited warranty, and license for the SL-DOG + API *** web portal software valid for one year from the date of purchase.

Annual subscription renewal to the SL-DOG software will be quoted at the then current rate with an option to continue SL-DOG API access. **If requested, we have an in-person training for additional cost. **Shipping, Handling, and Insurance via third party provider. Cost excludes any additional applicable taxes, duties, or other government charges.

This equipment is being sold for use solely by Suisan City. Use of this equipment outside of Suisan City is prohibited. Suisun understands and agrees that RH Borden and Company LLC is the exclusive provider of SL-RAT services for the state of California, and any service work related to this equipment shall be conducted through them.

InfoSense is currently an approved vendor on BuyBoard and TAUD. Please email [email protected] for more information. ***SL-DOG software consists of three components:
(1) A local client runs on a PC. It downloads the SL-RAT data from the device and is provided at no charge. (2) A cloud-based web portal set up for each customer that can assist with the management of SL-RAT data. It includes the ability to edit measurement data, add manhole ID's, add comments, manage data quality, review productivity and export the SL-RAT data in a variety of formats including Google Earth "kml", ArcGIS "SHP", Acrobat "pdf", and Excel or "csv". (3) A mobile APP for iOS and Android that can integrate with enterprise systems as well as enable entering notes and asset ID's in the field while conducting acoustic assessments. (4) The optional API functionality allows for automated exports and integration of SL-RAT data in to other applications.

Comments: (All returned or exchanged items are subject to 25% restocking fee.) Visit our website: www.infosense.com PAST WINNER WEF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AWARD Grand Total $34,910.00 Form Revision Date 07.29.24
All shipments are ARO, and subject to final verification upon receipt of order. All items will be shipped UPS ground unless otherwise specified. Please indicate whether partial shipment is acceptable. Shipping charges are Pre-Paid. An electronic copy of this quote may be provided for your convenience. InfoSense retains an original copy of all quotes and will consider the original to be the governing document.

Sales Quote
InfoSense Contacts
Suisun City
Alex Churchill
12/15/2025 InfoSense, Inc. Page 1 of 1 23
Acoustic Assessment

www.rhborden.com
The Sewer Line - Rapid Assessment Tool (SL-RAT)
•The standard for collection system maintenance
•Uses acoustics to assess sewer lines
•Recommended by the EPA
•Used by hundreds of utilities worldwide
•Holds ASTM standard for use
How it works:

The SL-RAT comes in two parts:
a transmitter and a receiver that
are placed on adjacent
manholes. The transmitter
sends tones down the pipe and
the receiver analyzes those
tones for degradation. Based on
the quality of the sound, each
pipe segment is given a
blockage score from 0 to 10.

Transmitter sends
Sound for 80 seconds
Receiver analyzes
sounds
Obstructions
Dissipate acoustic energy
The Results:

Pipe segments scoring a 7 or
above are ﬂowing freely and
need no further work. In the
average system, 72% of pipes
don’t need cleaning. Acoustic
Assessment saves millions of
feet of cleaning every year.
24 Reduce Y our Cleaning Workload by 89%
While inspecting 100% your system each year — Avoid surprise backups and blockages.

Use the low-cost SL-RAT to assess 100% of your system each year. 70-90% of your system will not need any further action. (Nationally, 89% of pipes assessed did not need additional attention.)
The 10-30% of your pipes that are blocked are cleaned with jet/vacuum trucks. Cleaned segments are then re-assessed using low-cost acoustics. Half or more of these pipes need no further action.

Pipes that still show blocks after cleaning are inspected using CCTV cameras.

The few pipe segments that CCTV shows to have serious
issues undergo engineering studies and repair or replacement. (Nationally, this is just 1% of the system.)
www.rhborden.com
Data Visualization: See Y our Top Priorities
See every pipe segment,
tracked over time to
identify problem areas.

Because the map is kept in
the cloud, it is available to
you, your crews, and
anyone else you want to
share it with at the click of a
button.

And this is your data so it’s
exportable to your GIS
system.
25 8116 South Tryon Street
Suite B3-203
Charlotte, NC 28273 USA

v2024.01.16

March 1, 2025

To Whom It May Concern:

InfoSense, Incorporated in Charlotte, North Carolina is the sole supplier manufacturer, and distributor of the Sewer Line Rapid Assessment Tool or SL-RAT® and its supporting software the Sewer Line Data Organizer or SL-DOG®.

RH Borden and Company LLC is the exclusive manufacturer’s representative and only factory authorized service provider for the states of Utah, Idaho, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, California, New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming. You may contact RH Borden and Company LLC at (385) 510-3223 or email Jon Borden at [email protected].

The SL-RAT line of acoustic pipe inspection equipment is patent-protected under U.S. Patent #8220484 and other pending patents. InfoSense manufactures the only product that uses Active Acoustic transmission between a transmitter and a receiver in adjacent manholes to provide an aggregate pipe blockage assessment.

The SL-RAT makes use of the fact that water and air flow similarly within a pipe. Our proprietary algorithms exploit this fact to assess blockage within a pipe segment – typically within 3 minutes or less and with no flow contact.

Sincerely,

Alex Churchill
CEO
InfoSense, Inc.

Past Winner WEF Innovative Technology Award
26 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

June 16, 2026

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Approving and Authorizing the Recordation of the Final Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. All costs associated with the preparation, processing, and recordation of the Final Parcel Map are the sole responsibility of the Developer.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Provide Good Governance.

BACKGROUND:

On December 16, 2025, the City Council approved the Tentative Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center located on Assessor Parcel Number (APN 0173-390-200), immediately west of Tractor Supply. See attached Location Map. The Tentative Parcel Map proposed the division of the 5.12 acres into 4 parcels plus 1 remainder parcel, ranging from roughly 0.95 to 1.12 acres. Following approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, a Final Parcel Map has been prepared in accordance with the approved subdivision layout. The Final Parcel Map will create four separate commercial parcels intended for future retail and service commercial development within Rancho Suisun Center. The westernmost parcel is planned for development with a Dutch Bros Coffee drive-through establishment.

Building permits for the project have been issued, allowing construction activities to commence.

STAFF REPORT:

The proposed Final Parcel Map has been reviewed for consistency with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, Subdivision Map Act and applicable subdivision requirements. The Solano County Surveyor on behalf of the City has completed review of the Final Parcel Map and has indicated that there are no outstanding comments or corrections required prior to approval and recordation. Approval of the Final Parcel Map will facilitate orderly commercial development of the Rancho Suisun Center property and allow the newly created parcels to proceed with future development consistent with City approvals and zoning regulations.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026- ___: Approving and Authorizing the Recordation of the Final Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center.

PREPARED BY:

Nick Lozano, Sr. Associate Engineer
REVIEWED BY:

Nouae Vue, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Recordation of the Final Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center

2. Location Map.pdf

3. Final Parcel Map.pdf
27 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN

CITY APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE RECORDATION OF THE

FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR RANCHO SUISUN CENTER

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2025, the City Council approved the Tentative Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center; and

WHEREAS, following the approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, a Final Parcel Map has been prepared in accordance with the approved subdivision layout; and

WHEREAS, the Solano County Surveyor in the capacity as the City’s Surveyor and on behalf of the City of Suisun City has found the proposed Parcel Map to be in substantial conformance to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and applicable provisions of the Suisun City Municipal Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Suisun City does hereby approve the Final Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center entitled “Parcel Map #2025- 00021 for Rancho Suisun Center” for filing with the Recorder of Solano County, California.

SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, and all other Suisun City Codes and Ordinances:
(1) Prior to the recording of the Parcel Map for Rancho Suisun Center, the Developer shall pay all applicable fees and costs.
(2) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for any of the buildings, the development shall be annexed into a Community Facilities District.
(3) All conditions of the Resolutions, Planning Commission actions, Development Agreement, etc., also apply unless explicitly changed by these conditions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ___________________________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: ___________________________________________________ ABSENT: Councilmembers: __________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ___________________________________________________

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of June 2026. _____________________________________
Anita Skinner
City Clerk
28 LOCATION MAP
Rancho Suisun Center

RANCHO SUISUN CENTER
29 30
±
STATE ROUTE 12
± ±
±
STATE ROUTE 12
±
Δ=
Δ=
31 32
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

June 16, 2026

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Accepting the T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project as Complete and Authorizing the City Manager to Record the Notice of Completion for the Project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There was no impact to the General Fund from the T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project (Project), Project No. HSIPSL-5032(039). The Project is funded with Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 11 allocation ($375,390) and the Off-Site Street Improvement Program (OSSIP, $152,616), for the design and construction phases.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Public Safety.

BACKGROUND:

On September 16, 2025, the City Council awarded the construction contract for the base Project to Spektren Engineering, Inc. (Contractor) in the amount of $398,233; and on February 17, 2026, the City Council also approved a contract change order in the amount of $88,120. With a contingency of 15% ($72,985), the approved construction budget was $559,338.

STAFF REPORT:

The installation of raised median islands to provide safer left-turn movements for motorists have been installed at the following locations:
• Railroad Avenue at Village Drive
• Walters Road at McClellan Drive
• Railroad Avenue at Birchwood Court

The City has received, reviewed, and approved the Contractor’s final invoice for this Project. The final construction contract amount is $460,495, which is $98,843 under the construction budget of $559,338.

Contractor has completed the Project in an acceptable satisfactory manner, and it is now appropriate to file the Notice of Completion (NOC) with the County for the Project. Staff recommend accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Manager to file and record the NOC with the County which will then start the one-year warranty period on the completed improvements associated with this Project.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026- ___: Accepting the T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project as Complete and Authorizing the City Manager to Record the Notice of Completion for the Project.

PREPARED BY:

Maribel De La Cruz, Associate Engineer
REVIEWED BY:

Nouae Vue, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:
33 1. Accepting the T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project as Complete and Authorizing the City Manager to Record the Notice of Completion for the Project.

2. Location Map.

3. Project Photos.

4. Notice of Completion.
34 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY

ACCEPTING THE T-INTERSECTION MEDIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

RECORD THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE PROJECT

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Spektren Engineering, Inc. for the T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project in the amount of $398,233; and
WHEREAS, on February 17, 2026, the City Council approved a contract change order in the amount of $88,120; and
WHEREAS, including a 15 percent construction contingency of $72,985, the total approved construction budget for the Project was $559,338; and
WHEREAS, the Project included the installation of raised median islands to improve traffic safety and facilitate left -turn movements at Railroad Avenue at Village Drive, Walters Road at McClellan Drive, and Railroad Avenue at Birchwood Court; and WHEREAS, the City has received, reviewed, and approved the Contractor’s final invoice, and the final construction contract amount is $460,495, which is $98,843 less than the approved construction budget; and
WHEREAS, it is now appropriate to accept the Project as complete and to authorize the City Manager to file and record a Notice of Completion with the County, which will initiate the one-year warranty period for the completed improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Suisun City does hereby accept the improvements completed for the T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project, Project No. HSIPSL-5032(039), as complete and authorizes the City Manager to take all necessary actions to execute and record the Notice of Completion.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of June 2026.

Anita Skinner
City Clerk

35 Location Map
T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project, Project No. HSIPSL-5032(039) 36 37
38 39
1 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

Name Public Works Department

Street CITY OF SUISUN CITY
Address 701 CIVIC CENTER BLVD.

City & SUISUN CITY, CA 94585
State, Zip

No Fee, per code 27283

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

A.P.N.

Notice is hereby given that:

1. The undersigned is owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.

2. The full name of the undersigned is City of Suisun City

3. The full address of the undersigned is 701 Civic Center Blvd.

Suisun City, CA 94585

4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: In fee. N/A (If other than fee, strike “In fee” and insert, for example, “purchaser under contract of purchase,” or “lessee.”)

5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NONE

NAMES ADDRESSES

6. The names of the predecessors in the interest of the undersigned, if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to: NONE

NAMES ADDRESSES

(If no transfer made, insert “none.”)

7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on: June 16, 2026

8. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Spektren Engineering, Inc.

(If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert “none.”)

9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Suisun City , County of Solano , State of California, and is described as follows:

T-Intersection Median Safety Improvements Project

10. The street address of said property is
Railroad Avenue at Village Drive, Walters Road at McClellan Drive, and Railroad Avenue at Birchwood Court.

11. I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature of
owner named
Dated: in paragraph 2

By Bret Prebula, City Manager

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
40 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

June 16, 2026

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Council Resolution 2026-___: Intent to Annex Territory to Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein (Suisun City Dental).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There would be no impact to the General Fund from this item. The cost of the annexation process is covered by developer supplied funds. The Annexation of Suisun City Dental into Community Facilities District No. 2 meets the fiscal criteria as established by Resolution No. 2005-69 Cost Recovery Policy for New Development, dated October 4, 2005. The Community Facilities District is intended to offset Municipal Service costs, including administrative costs, thereby reducing the negative fiscal impact of new development on the City’s General Fund.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Sustainability and Stewardship.

BACKGROUND:

As part of the conditions of approval for Suisun City Dental, the developer is required to mitigate the impact on City Services due to the new development. In accordance with the development conditions imposed on development project, the landowner is annexing to Community Facility District No. 2 to offset municipal service costs for police, fire, paramedics, landscaping and storm drain maintenance.

STAFF REPORT:

The first step in the legislative process for annexation of Suisun City Dental into Community Facility District No. 2 (CFD#2) is for Council to pass a Resolution of Intention. This will be Annexation 19 into CFD#2.

The next step will include conducting the Public Hearing, opening of ballots, and adopting the associated Ordinance which will complete the annexation process for Suisun City Dental into CFD#2.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council Adopt Resolution 2026- ___: Intent to Annex Territory to Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein (Suisun City Dental).

PREPARED BY:

Amanda Dum, Management Analyst II
REVIEWED BY:

Nouae Vue, Public Works Direction & City
Engineer
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution of Intent to Annex Territory to CFD.docx

2. Annexation Map No. 19.

3. Community Facilities District #2 Rate and Method of Apportionment. 41 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__

A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE

LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN (SUISUN CITY DENTAL)

Annexation No. 19 (Suisun City Dental)

RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Suisun City (the “City”), County of Solano, State of California, that:

WHEREAS, this Council has conducted proceedings to establish Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services) (the “CFD”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, under the Act, this Council, as the legislative b ody for the CFD, is empowered with the authority to annex territory to the CFD, and now desires to undertake proceedings to annex territory to the CFD.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Findings. This Council hereby finds and determines that public convenience and necessity require that territory be added to the CFD.

2. Territory Described. The name of the existing CFD is “City of Suisun City Community Facilities District No. 2 (Municipal Services).” The territory originally included in t he existing CFD is set forth in the map of the CFD heretofore recorded in the Solano County Recorder’s Office on October 27, 2005, in Book 23 at Page 60 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, to which map reference is hereby made, as suc h map has been supplemented in connection with subsequent annexations.

The territory now proposed to be annexed to the CFD is as shown on the Annexation Map for the captioned Annexation No. 19 (Suisun City Dental) to the CFD, on file with the Clerk, the boundaries of which territory are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for further particulars. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause to be recorded such Annexation Map, showing the territory to be annexed, in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Solano within 15 days of the date of adoption of this resolution.

3. The Services. The types of public services financed by the CFD and pursuant to the Act consist of those municipal services (the “Services”) as described in Exhibit A to the Resolution of Formation with respect to the CFD adopted by the Council as Resolution No. 2005 -89 on November 15, 2005 (the “Resolution of Formation”). It is presently intended that the Services will be provided, without prefer ence or priority, to the existing territory in the CFD and the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD.
42 4. Special Tax. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the CFD to pay for the Services, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof is intended to be levied annually within the CFD and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes.

The special tax proposed to pay for Services to be supplied within the territory proposed to be annexed will be equal to the special taxes levied to pay for the same Services in the CFD, except that a higher or lower tax may be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed or to be annexed in the future to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services in that territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services in the CFD.

The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within the CFD, as now in existence and following the annexation proposed herein, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in the Rate and Method.

5. Hearing. Tuesday, July 21, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the City Hall, Council Chambers, 701 Civic Center Boulevard, Suisun City, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Council, as legislative body for the CFD, will conduct a public hearing on the matters described in this Resolution.

6. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the CFD, including the area to be annexed to the CFD. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least 7 days before the date herein set for said hearing. The City Clerk may also cause a copy of such notice and a copy of this Resolution to be mailed to e ach landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed, which notice, and resolution shall be mailed at least 15 days before the date of said hearing. Such notice shall be substantially in the form specified in Section 53339.4 of the Act, with a summary form specifically authorized.

7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. * * * * * *
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of June 2026.

Anita Skinner
City Clerk

43 44

EXHIBIT B

CITY OF SUISUN CITY
Community Facilities District No. 2
(Municipal Services)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
A Special Tax applicable. to each Assessor's Parcel in Community Facilities District No. -.2(Municipal Services) (the "CFD") shall be levied and collected according to the tax liability determined by the City Council, through the application of the appropriate amount or rate for Taxable Property, as described below. All of the property in the CFO, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section E below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided, including property subsequently annexed to the CFO unless a separate Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax is adopted for the annexation area.

A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
"Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final subdivision map or other parcel map recorded at the Solano County Recorder's Office.
"Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Chapter

2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 commencing at Section 53311 of the California Government Code.
"Administrator" means the individual(s) designated by the City to administer the CFD in accordance with the authority and powers granted by the City Council. "Assessor's Parcel" or "Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel number.
"Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the County Assessor of the County of Solano designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number. "Average Increase" means the annual average increase in the Indices that shall be applied to escalate the Maximum Special Tax each Fiscal Year. The Average Increase shall be calculated in January of each year by (1) referencing the Bureau of Labor Statistics Data to identify the annual percentage increase in each Index as of the end of the prior year, and (2) taking the average of these two percentages. If either Index decreases from one year to the next, the percentage change from the prior year shall be assumed to be zero for purposes of calculating the Average Increase.
"Building Square Footage" means the total gross square footage of the floor area of the buildings on any Parcel of Non-Residential Property determined by calculating the combined floor area contained within a building's exterior walls including the area of an addition 45 \
J
where floor area is increased. Parking areas and exterior walkways shall not be included in the calculation of Building Square Footage. The determination of Building Square Footage shall be made by reference to appropriate records kept by the City's Building Department. "CFD-Wide Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax identified in Section C.1 below that shall be levied on all Developed Property within the CFO. "CFD-Wide Special Tax Requirement" means the amount necessary in any Fiscal Year to (i) pay the cost of authorized police, fire, paramedical, storm drain and City-wide landscaping services, (ii) pay administrative expenses of the CFO, and (iii) cure delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes levied in prior Fiscal Years or (based on delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes which have already taken place) are expected to occur in the Fiscal zit:Year in which the tax will be collected. : t r : - . - - - - - - - . "City" means the City of Suisun City.
"City Council" means the City Council of the City of Suisun City, acting as the legislative body of the CFO. . .
"Developed Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property for which a building permit for new construction has been issued prior to July 1 of the preceding Fiscal Year.
"Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Indices" means the Consumer Price Indexes for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category and the U.S. City Average Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers Category.
"Live/Work Property" means a Parcel on which all or a portion of a Unit is deed restricted for commercial use, as determined in the sole discretion of the City. "Maximum CFO-Wide Special Tax" means the maximum CFO-Wide Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C.1 below, that can be levied on Taxable Property in any Fiscal Year.
"Maximum Tax Zone Special Tax" means the maximum Tax Zone Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C.2 below, that can be levied on Taxable Property in any Fiscal Year.
"Multi-Family Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued for construction of a residential structure with Units that are offered for rent to the general public.
"Non-Residential Property" means any Taxable Property within the boundaries of the CFO that is not Live/Work Property, Single Family Detached Property, Single Family Attached Property or Multi-Family Property, as defined herein.
"Public Agency" means the federal government, State of California or other local governments or public agencies.
46 "RMA" means this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. "Single Family Attached Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued for construction of a residential structure consisting of two or more Units that share common walls and are offered as for-sale units, including such residential structures that meet that statutory definition of a condominium contained in Civil Code Section 1351.
"Single Family Detached Property" means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Developed Property which meet both of the following criteria: (i) a building permit was issued for construction of a Unit that does not share a common wall with another Unit, and (ii) the Parcel _____ has not been designated as Live/Work Property. -----·--·-------------- �------------ -------·----------------------- _ "Special Tax?' means a special -tax levied in a n y Fiscal -Year to pay t h e CFD-Wide Special Tax Requirement or the Tax Zone Special Tax Requirement." "Taxable Property" means all Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of the CFO which are not exempt from _the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Tax Zone" means a mutually exclusive geographic area within which a particular Tax Zone Special Tax may be levied pursuant to this RMA. All of the property within the CFO at the time of the CFD formation is within Tax Zone #1; additional Tax Zones may be created when property is annexed into the CFO, and a separate Tax Zone Special Tax shall be identified for property within a new Tax Zone at the time of such annexation. "Tax Zone Special Tax" means a Special Tax that shall be levied within a particular Tax Zone or Tax Zones but not necessarily levied at a consistent rate throughout the entire CFO.
"Tax Zone Special Tax Requirement" means the amount necessary in any Fiscal Year to pay the cost of authorized landscaping services within a particular Tax Zone. A separate Tax Zone Special Tax Requirement shall be determined each Fiscal Year for each Tax Zone within which a Tax Zone Special Tax is authorized to be levied. "Unit" means a residential dwelling unit, including individual single-family detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhome, condominium, or apartment units.

B. DATA FOR ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION OF SPECIAL TAX
After July 1 of each Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall categorize all Parcels of Taxable Property in the CFO as Single Family Detached Property, Single Family Attached Property, Multi-Family Property, Live/Work Property or Non-Residential Property. For each Parcel of Single Family Attached Property, Live/Work Property and Multi-Family Property, the Administrator shall determine the number of Units on the Parcel by referencing the building permit, site plan, condominium plan, apartment plan or other development plan for the Parcel.

The Administrator shall determine the Building Square Footage for all Parcels of Non Residential Property. The Administrator shall also determine the Tax Zone within which each Parcel of Taxable Property is located.
47 C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX

1. CFD-Wide Special Tax
Table 1 below identifies the Maximum CFO-Wide Special Taxes.

Table 1
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2
(Municipal Services)
- i
i
Maximum CFD-Wide Special Taxes •
Mu
Live/Work Property
aximum CFD-Wide Special Tax '
Fiscal Year 2005-06
$629.90 er Unit
$472.43 er Unit
$236.21 er Unit
$629.90 per Unit plus $629.90 per 1,000
square feet (or portion thereof) of non
residential building and ancillary
im rovements
Non-Residential Property The greater of $629.90 per parcel or $629.90 per 1,000 Square Feet (or portion
thereof of Buildin S uare Foota e
* Beginning in January 2006 and each January thereafter, this Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. Each annual adjustment of the Maximum Special Tax shall become effective on the subsequent July 1.
48 2. Tax Zone #1 Special Tax
Table 2 below identifies the Maximum Tax Zone Special Tax for Tax Zone #1. A different Maximum Tax Zone Special Tax shall be identified for Tax Zones added to the CFO as a result of future annexations.

Table 2
City of Suisun City
Community Facilities District No. 2
(Municipal Services)
Maximum Tax Zone Special Taxes for Tax Zone #1 --===-=--=--------=.a••:.>.".o.: - � - - • • - • • 7- " 7 h, 0 C . • • • • • • . e• Y . • • • • . • ,••••� -•-7--� •••� Y - •• " 7 " , C - � - •- � - . : , . , •- · •• . . . • ��--•=•=• >-•�•� •••-• �--.--••. ,-.os .. ,••• .. > •• • . O • • . • • • ,' " • • . • • '- = • • • • • • • • " ' • ., • • • • , • • • • • . . O •••••- ••," c ••o •••· ••• , .

Maximum CFD-Wide Special Tax .-.

Land Use Category Tax Zone #1
Fiscal Year 2005-06
Single Family Detached Property $386.04 per Unit
Single Family Attached Property $289.53 per Unit
Multi-Family Property $144.77 per Unit
Live/Work Property $386.04 per Unit plus $386.04 per 1,000 square feet ( or portion thereof) of non-
residential space
Non-Residential Property The greater of $386.04 per Parcel or $386.04 per 1,000 Square Feet (or portion
thereof) of Building Square Footage
Beginning in January 2006 and each January thereafter, this Maximum Special Tax shall be adjusted by applying the Average Increase, if any, in the Indices. Each annual adjustment of the Maximum Special Tax shall become effective on the subsequent July 1.

D. METHOD OF LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL TAX

1. CFD-Wide Special Tax
Each Fiscal Year, the CFO-Wide Special Tax shall be levied on all Parcels of Developed Property within the CFO as follows:

Step 1: Determine the CFO-Wide Special Tax Requirement for the Fiscal Year in which the CFO-Wide Special Tax will be collected;
Step 2: Calculate the total CFO-Wide Special Tax revenues that could be collected from Developed Property within the CFO based on application of the Maximum CFO-Wide Special Tax rates determined pursuant to Section C.1 above;
Step 3: If the amount determined in Step 1 is greater than or equal to the amount calculated in Step 2, levy the Maximum CFO-Wide Special Tax on all Parcels of Developed Property in the CFO.
49 )
Step 4: If the amount determined in Step 1 is less than the amount calculated in Step 2, levy the CFO-Wide Special Tax against all Parcels of Developed Property in equal percentages up to 100% of the Maximum CFO-Wide Special Tax for each Parcel until the amount of the CFO-Wide Special Tax levy equals the CFO-Wide Special Tax Requirement for that Fiscal Year.

2. Tax Zone Special Tax
Each Fiscal Year, the Tax Zone Special Tax shall be levied on all Parcels of Developed Property within each Tax Zone as follows:

Step.1:• Separately for each Tax Zone, determine the Tax Zone Special Tax - R e q u i r e m e n t for the Fiscal Year in which the Tax Zone Special Tax will be - -._.-......f f) 4 ] @ f l ( fl _ --....-...-..-_....-.-........ � Step 2: Calculate separately for each Tax Zone the total Tax Zone Special Tax revenues that could be collected from Developed Property within the Tax Zone based on application of the Maximum Tax Zone Special Tax rates for that Tax Zone;
Step 3: If the amount determined in Step 1 is greater than or equal to the amount calculated in Step 2, levy the Maximum Tax Zone Special Tax on all Parcels of Developed Property in the Tax Zone.

Step 4: If the amount determined in Step 1 is less than the amount calculated in Step 2, levy the Tax Zone Special Tax against all Parcels of Developed Property within the Tax Zone in equal percentages up to 100% of the Maximum Tax Zone Special Tax for each Parcel until the amount of the Tax Zone Special Tax levy equals the Tax Zone Special Tax Requirement for that Fiscal Year.

The. CFO-Wide Special Tax and the Tax Zone Special Tax within the CFO shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, provided, however, that the CFD may (under the authority provided in the Act), in any particular case, bill the taxes directly to the property owner off the County tax roll, and the Special Taxes will be equally subject to penalties and foreclosure if delinquent.

E. LIMITATIONS
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax, no Special Tax shall be levied on land that has been conveyed to a Public Agency, except as otherwise provided in Sections 53317.3 and 53317.5 of the Act.

F. INTERPRETATION OF SPECIAL TAX FORMULA
The City reserves the right to make minor administrative and technical changes to this document that do not materially affect the rate and method of apportioning Special Taxes. In addition, the interpretation and application of any section of this document shall be left to the City's discretion. Interpretations may be made by the City by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment. 50 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

AGENDA TRANSMITTAL

MEETING DATE:

June 16, 2026

AGENDA ITEM:

Council Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-___: Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Consultant Contract on the City’s Behalf with Calpo Hom & Dong Architects for the Police and Fire Department Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is enough money in Fund 010-3350-93140 Major Facilities that can be reallocated to account 91140 -Professional Services to cover this expense in Fiscal Year 2025-2026, and perhaps rollover to the following year budget.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Public Safety and Sustainability and Stewardship

BACKGROUND:

Suisun City is growing in population with both the Police Department and Fire Department staff growing to match the needs of the community. However, both divisions are growing out of their facilities. The Police Department was constructed in 1989; and the Fire Station was constructed in 1982, the Training Room potable was added 2003, and the Fire Department Office portable was added 2005.

The City has decided to consult with architects to conduct a needs assessment to determine what is needed for each department’s facilities. Facilities Maintenance worked with each of the departments to create a balanced request for proposals and advertised this project on February 25, 2026.

This assessment and feasibility study will help the City understand the limitations of each of the division’s facilities with growing department staff and needs. Solutions and potential costs will also be presented to the City at the end of this study.

STAFF REPORT:

On February 25, 2026, the City advertised this project on the City’s procurement portal and the Daily Republic. There was a mandatory pre-proposal meeting on March 11, 2026 with 14 architects in attendance for the walk-through of the Police Department and Fire Department.

Proposals were due on April 8, 2026. The City received three proposals, submitted by Calpo Hom & Dong Architects, LPA Sacramento, and Nacht & Lewis. Following a comprehensive evaluation, staff determined that Calpo Hom & Dong Architects is the most suitable consultant for the study. The firm meets or exceeds the required qualifications and is able to perform the work within the established project budget.

Staff recommends awarding the consultant contract for the Police and Fire Department Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study for the total amount of $64,160, including a 20% contingency in the amount of $12,832 in the construction budget towards addressing unforeseen items for a total of $76,992.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026- ___: Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Consultant Contract on the City’s Behalf with Calpo Hom & Dong for the Police and Fire Department Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study. 51 PREPARED BY:

Gemma Geluz, Administrative Technician
REVIEWED BY:

Nouae Vue, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:

Bret Prebula, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution Awarding Contract for the Police Dept and Fire Dept Facilities Need and Feasability Study.docx

2. Agreement - PD & FD Facility Needs Assessment & Feasibilty Study - Calpo Hom & Dong.pdf

3. RFP - PD
FD Building Needs Assessment (final 260223).pdf

4. Calpo Hom & Dong Proposal.pdf

5. Calpo Hom & Dong Cost Proposal.pdf
52 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUISUN CITY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONSULTANT CONTRACT ON THE CITY’S BEHALF WITH CALPO HOM & DONG ARCHITECTS

FOR THE POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT FACILITIES NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY.

WHEREAS, the Police Department was constructed in 1989 and the Fire Station was constructed in 1985 and the Training and Office portables were added in 2003 and 2005; and

WHEREAS, both departments are growing in staff along with the City’s population; and

WHEREAS, the City has determined that both departments need a facility needs assessment for their current use and future department growth; and

WHEREAS, the City advertised a request for proposal for a Police Department and Fire Department Facilities Needs and Feasibility Study and received three [3] proposals; and

WHEREAS, the City staff evaluated the received proposals and determined that Calpo Hom & Dong Architects is the most suitable consultant for the study; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Suisun City authorizes the City Manager to enter into a consultant contract on behalf of the City with Calpo Hom & dong Architects for the Police and Fire Department Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study in the amount of $64,160 for the base Project along a Project Contingency ($12,832), and to take any and all necessary and appropriate actions to implement this contract.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Suisun City duly held on Tuesday, the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 16th day of June 2026.

Anita Skinner
City Clerk

53 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 1 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

CITY OF SUISUN CITY

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

CONSULTANT ARCHITECT FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT

AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY
STUDY

THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein “Agreement”), is made and entered into this ____ day of __________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF SUISUN CITY, a municipal corporation, (herein “City”) and Calpo Hom & Dong Architects (herein “Consultant”). (The term Consultant includes professionals performing in a consulting capacity.) The parties hereto agree as follows:

1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which services may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein and, in light of such status and experience, Consultant covenants that it shall follow the applicable standard of care for professionals providing similar services under similar circumstances in performing the work and services required hereunder.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

The Scope of Service shall include the Consultant’s proposal or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 54 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 2 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and are typical of services Consultants provide, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City against any such fees, assessments, taxes penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Contract, Consultant warrants that Consultant (a) has reasonably investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has reasonably considered how the services should be performed, and (c) reasonably understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be reasonably acquainted wit h the conditions there existing that are within Consultant’s scope of work and would be apparent to any Consultant providing services similar to those provided by Consultant, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from t he Contract Officer.

1.6 Care of Work.

The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No su ch extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, 55 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 3 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation that brings the total cost of the contract to less than $35,000 may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any increases that bring the total cost of the contract to $35,000 or more, taken either separately or cumulatively must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Sect ion shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.9 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.

2.0 COMPENSATION

2.1 Contract Sum.

For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of Sixty-Four Thousand One Hundred Sixty Dollars ($64,160.00) (herein “Contract Sum”), except as provided in Section 1.8. The meth od of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion, (ii) payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and n ecessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expense, transportation expense approved by the Contract Officer in advance, and no other expenses and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City; Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.2 Method of Payments.

Unless some other method of payment is specified in the Schedule of Compensation, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first (1st) working day of such month, Consultant shall submit to the City in the form approved by the City’s Director of Finance, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Except as provided in Section 7.3, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than the last working day of the month. 56 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 4 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D”, if any, and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of th e Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any government al agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 7.8 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding one (1) year from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance.

4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representative of Consultant.

The following principals of Consultant are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
57 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 5 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

Name:

Company: Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Address: 2120 20th Street
City, State Zip: Sacramento, CA 95818
Phone: 916-446-7741
Email:

It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substa ntially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City.

4.2 Contract Officer.

The Contract Officer shall be such person as may be designated by the City Manager of City. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, w hether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

4.4 Independent Consultant.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or 58 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 6 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent Consultant of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent Consultant with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not i n any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

5.0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS

5.1 Insurance.

The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance:
(a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance . A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis. If the Contract Sum is $25,000.00 or less, the policy of insurance shall be written in an amount not less than either (i) a combined single limit of $500,000.00 or (ii) bodily injury limits of $250,000.00 per person, $500,000.00 per occurrence and $500,000.00 products and completed operations and property damage limits of $100,000.00 per occurrence and $100,000.00 in the aggre gate. If the Contract Sum is greater than $25,000.00 but less than or equal to $100,000.00, the policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than either (i) a combined single limit of $1,000,000.00 for bodily injury, death and property damage or (ii ) bodily injury limits of $500,000.00 per person, $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $1,000,000.00 products and completed operations and property damage limits of $500,000.00 per occurrence and $500,000.00 in the aggregate. If the Contract Sum is greater than $100,000.00, the policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $5,000,000.00 combined single limit.
(b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance . A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both the Consultant and the City against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance . A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than either (i) bodily injury liability limits of $250,000.00 per person and $500,000.00 per occurrence and property damage liability limits of $100,000.00 per occurrence and $250,000.00 in the aggregate or (ii) combined single limit liability of $500,000.00. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non- owned, leased and hired cars.
(d) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, including professional liability insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements. 59 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 7 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name the City, its officers, employees and agents as additional insureds. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City, its offi cers, employees and agents and their respective insurers. All of said policies of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or cancelled without providing thirty (30) days prior written notice by registered mail to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Section

5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until the Consultant has provided the City with Certificates of Insurance or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by the City.

All certificates shall name the City as additional insured (providing the appropriate endorsement) and shall conform to the following “cancellation” notice:

CANCELLATION:

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATED THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30) -DAY ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN.
[to be initialed] ______________
Agent Initials
The Consultant agrees that the provisions of this Section 5.1 shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from the Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which the Consultant is otherwise responsible.

In the event the Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.3 of this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subConsultant shall require the subConsultant to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to this Section 5.1.

5.2 Indemnification.

Consultant agrees to indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, or liabilities, (herein “claims or liabilities”) to the extent arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities of Consultant, its agents, employees, sub Consultants, or invitees, provided for herein, or arisi ng from the negligent acts or omissions of Consultant hereunder, or arising from Consultant’s negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of the City, its officers, agents or employees but excluding such cl aims or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents or employees, who are directly responsible to the City, and in connection therewith:
60 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 8 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom;
(c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, in cluding but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.

5.3 Performance Bond.

Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, Consultant shall deliver to City a performance bond in the sum of the amount of this Agreement, in the form provided by the City Clerk, which secures the faithful performance of this Agreement, unless such requirement is waived by the Contract Officer. The bond sha ll contain the original notarized signature of an authorized officer of the surety and affixed thereto shall be a certified and current copy of his power of attorney. The bond shall be unconditional and remain in force during the entire term of the Agreement and shall be null and void only if the Consultant promptly and faithfully performs all terms and conditions of this Agreement.

5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer or Surety.

Insurance or bonds required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, an d only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City due to unique circumstances. In the event the Risk Manager of City (“Risk Manager”) reasonably determines that the work or services to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Consultant agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies and the performance bond required by this Section 5 may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the Risk Manager; provided that the Consultant shall have the right to appeal a determination of increased coverage by the Risk Manager to the City Council of City within 10 days of receipt of notice from the Risk Manager.

6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS

6.1 Reports.
61 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 9 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease t he cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

6.2 Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require subconsultants to keep, such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant, its employees, subconsultants and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereund er. Any use of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and the City shall indemnify the Consultant for all damages resulting therefrom. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein.

All subconsultants shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

6.4 Release of Documents.

The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer.

7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT

7.1 California Law.
62 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 10 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agr eement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Solano, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.

7.2 Disputes.

In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the injured party; pro vided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, such immediate action may be necessary. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party’s right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City’s or the Consultant’s right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder . The failure of the City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect the City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.4 Waiver.

No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. A party’s consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring the party’s consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercis e by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.
63 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 11 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

7.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination without cause , the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination without cause, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set -off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.

If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be grante d, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any 64 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 12 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation . All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial i nterest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, s ex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry.

9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notice.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer, CITY OF SUISUN CITY, 701 CIVIC CENTER 65 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 13 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

BLVD., CA 94585, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Integration; Amendment.

It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing.

9.4 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.5 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreeme nt, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound.

66 Police Dept & Fire Dept Facility Needs
Assessment & Feasibility Study Page 14 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With Calpo Him & Dong Architects

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY:

CITY OF SUISUN CITY
a municipal corporation

Bret Prebula, City Manager
ATTEST:

City Clerk – Anita Skinner

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

RICHARDS WATSON GERSHON

City Attorney – Patrick Enright
CONSULTANT:

Company:

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Address:

[END OF SIGNATURES]
67 SSMP & SERP Update Agreem Page 15 of 21 EXHIBIT “A” (Page 1 of 2) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

68 REQUEST FOR

PROPOSALS

City of Suisun City

CONSULTANT ARCHITECT
FOR

POLICE DEPARTMENT

AND FIRE STATION

FACILITY NEEDS AND

FEASIBILITY STUDY

April 8, 2026
69 A1. Cover Letter

April 8, 2026

Request for Proposal Review Committee
Suisun City Public Works Department
City of Suisun City
Suisun City, California

Subject : REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fir e Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Members of the Review Committee :

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects (CH&D ) is well qualified for the City of Suisun City Facility Needs and Feasibility Study and presents our qualifications herein.

This project requires an overall complete assessment and analysis of existing sites and buildings, and a thorough and comprehensive programming guide; the assessment and analysis tells us what we have, and the programming guide tells us what we need to do for the future.

CH&D will be the Prime Consultant and Leader of the Project Team for both the Facility Needs and Feasibility Study and the Existing Building Analyses. CH&D has put together a Team of Engineers, and Law Enforcement and Fire Officers (retired), to address the important issues of the Facility Needs and Feasibility Study and the Existing Building Analyses. All Team members are committed for the duration of the project; any change is subject to City approval.

CH&D has added the services of Retired Police Chief Bruce Muramoto, as a Police Facility Consultant, and Retired Division Chief Fred Russell, as a Fire Facility Consultant. Both bring a wealth of experience from their professions, and also from actual Facility Building Projects.

The CH&D Team has experience with Law Enforcement Facilities and Fire Stations. CH&D has completed Space Studies and Design for numerous Public Safety Facilities, including the Firebaugh Police Department, Roseville Police Department, Lincoln Police Department, West Sacramento Police Department, Winters Police and Fire Departments, and the Yreka Police Department. CH&D has designed 25+ Fire Stations throughout Northern California.

CH&D and Team has no potential conflicts of interest with the City of Suisun City.

CH&D and Team has no lawsuits or litigation resulting from any job undertaken by the firm or by its sub-consultants which is still pending or has occurred on projects within the last five years.

CH&D Acknowledges three Addenda to this RFP. Acknowledgement Forms attached herein.

As Principal-In-charge, I will personally be the managing partner for this project, and am authorized to enter any contracts on behalf of the firm. As the Project Architect for all of the Public Safety projects mentioned in this proposal, I and the staff of CH&D look forward to the opportunity to a successful working relationship with the City of Suisun City.

Sincerely,

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Dennis Dong, AIA, CSI
70 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
2 A2. Executive Summary
This proposal is for the development of a Facility Needs and Feasibility Study for the Suisun City Police Department and Fire Department.

The reason for the proposal is succinctly expressed in the RFP:

Purpose of the Study:

The proposed study would provide Council with objec tive, professional analysis to answer key questions before conditions become critical, including:
• Whether the existing building can be reconfigured or
expanded to meet short- and mid-term needs;
• The feasibility and cost implications of vertical expansion, interior reconfiguration, or interim solutions;
• Facility requirements needed to meet EMD mandates,
technology growth, and evidence standards;
• How to best align near-term and mid-term needs with long-term development scenarios; and
• Risks, costs, and operational impacts associated with delaying action.

Importantly, the study would not recommend a single outcome but instead provide the City with options, cost ranges, and risk assessments to support informed policy decisions.

To repeat, this proposal is for a STUDY, to be used as a tool by the City for determining solutions to critical issues facing the Police and Fire Departments.

To accomplish this Study, Calpo Hom & Dong Architects (CH&D) has put together a team of experts and professionals to:

Conduct interviews and discussions with the User Groups to establish the specific needs and requirements – critical and future – of the Study.

This team will include CH&D for the Study preparation and analyses, and members who have served in Police and Fire Departments, which we find essential for understanding the language and culture of the Department, giving the interviewing a much more relaxed and personal tone.

Conduct analyses of existing facilities to help determine potential directions for improvements to help fulfill the Study. This team will consist of CH&D and Engineering Consultants – Structural, Mechanical, Electrical – to create a base to complement the Study.

71 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
3 A3. Project Team

Design Solutions start with the Project Team, specifically selected for each project. Calpo Hom & Dong Architects is pleased with our Team assembled for the Suisun City Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study ; this is a Team comprised of Architects and Engineers with a solid history of working together, allowing the Team to confidently proceed with the tasks of Solution-Forming. The Owner and the Users are important members of the Project Team, providing the input and feedback vital to the success of the Project.

CH&D will be the Prime Consultant and Leader of the Project Team.

This CH&D Team will be committed to perform the proposed work within the time limits of the project’
This CH&D Team will be responsive to all issues in a timely manner.

This CH&D Team will track team hours worked and will provide invoices in a timely manner.

Project Team Members include the following.

Architecture and Programming :

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects, Sacramento

Established in 1984, CH&D is well-versed in the design and programming of Public Safety Facilities, and has prepared Faci lity Needs and Feasibility Studies for Winters, Roseville, Rio Vista, Firebaugh.

Principal-In-Charge/Project Manager: Dennis Dong , AIA, CSI [email protected] / 530-305-9129
Involvement with Facilities Need & Feasibility Stu dy and Existing Building Analysis

Law Enforcement Consultant :

Bruce Muramoto, Davis

37 years of municipal law enforcement experience; P roject Manager for two new Police Facility Projects – West Sacramento and Winters – and understands the functions and operations of Police Departments, and how to commu nicate with fellow officers.

Bruce Muramoto has worked with Calpo Hom & Dong Ar chitects, and Dennis Dong

Principal-In-Charge : Bruce Muramoto, Police Chie f (ret) Winters [email protected] / 530-681-2867
Involvement with Facilities Need & Feasibility Stu dy

Fire Consultant :

FDC Consultants, Placerville
Established in 2007, a professional consulting com pany that specializes in Public Safety related projects, and is committed to ensuring the successful completion of every project.

FDC Consultants has worked with Calpo Hom & Dong A rchitects, and Dennis Dong on several Fire Station projects
Principal-In-Charge: Fred Russell, Division Chie f (ret) El Dorado Hills Fire Department
[email protected] / 530-306-1617
Involvement with Facilities Need & Feasibility Stu dy

72 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
4 Structural Engineering :

Bevier Structural Engineering, Sacramento

Founded in 1993, and providing Structural Engineering services for commercial, residential, solar, DSA and OSHPD projects through out the Western United States.

Principal-In-Charge: Jeff Kovach, SE

[email protected] / 916-631-3030
Involvement with Existing Building Analysis

Mechanical, Engineering :

Sigma Engineering, Sacramento

Established in 1997 with extensive experience in providing mechanical engineering services for all phases of HVAC Systems, Plumbing, Water/Waste Distribution, Fire Protection Systems, and Energy Compliance.

Sigma Engineering, and it’s predecessor firm, Ed Rios & Associates, has provided Mechanical Engineering services to Calpo Hom & Dong Architects, and Dennis Dong specifically, for over thirty years.

Mechanical Engineer: John Kaiser, ME

[email protected] / 530-575-2801
Involvement with Existing Building Analysis

Electrical Engineering

Capitol City Design, West Sacramento
Established in 1994, with extensive experience in the engineering and design of all phases of Power, Signal, and Lighting Design for Institu tional and Commercial facilities, as well as renovation of existing facilities and expansion of existing electrical services.

Capitol City Design, and it’s predecessor firm, No rberg Engineering, has provided Electrical Engineering services to Calpo Hom & Don g Architects, and Dennis Dong specifically, for over thirty years.

Electrical Engineer: Tony Baker

[email protected] / 916-267-3249
Involvement with Existing Building Analysis

References
The CH&D Team appreciates the request for references, and encourages the City to call on and check these references to confirm qualifications.

Ryan Chance, Engineering Manager, City of Folsom
Client, Folsom Fire Stations 34, 39
[email protected] / 916-548-9994

Dave Gamache, Police Chief (ret.), Yreka Police Department Client, Yreka Police Facility Project
[email protected] / 530-340-2375 cell

Eric Alvarez, Fire Chief, Willits Fire Department
Client, Willits Fire Station 54
[email protected] / 707-459-6271
[email protected] / 916-223-7741 cell

Of note, is the fact
that the Project
Engineers with
Bevier SE, Sigma
Engineering, and
Capitol City
Design, have all
worked together
with Principal-In-
Charge Dennis
Dong on Fire
Stations in El
Dorado Hills,
Folsom, Willits,
Winters, Lincoln,
and Williams, and
Police Facilities in
Roseville, Yreka,
and Winters

73 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
5 Building Analyses Consultants

Facility Needs & Feasibility Study
Consultants

Project Team Organization Chart

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects

Consultants

CH&D Staff

Programming Study
Facilities Assessment

Sigma Engineering
Mechanical Engineers
HVAC and Plumbing Design
Capitol City Design
Electrical Engineers
Electrical Lighting, Power, and
Signal Design
Bevier Structural Engineering
Structural Engineers
Structural Engineering Design
Police Department
and
Fire Department
Dennis Dong, AIA, CSI
Principal-In-Charge
Project Manager
City of
Suisun City
Bruce Muramoto
Police Chief (ret)
Lae Enforcement Consultant
FDC Consultants
Fred Russell, Division Chief (ret)
Fire Consultant
74 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
6 A4. Key Personnel References

• Folsom Fire Station No. 38 Remodel and Addition
• City of Folsom Fire Department
• Contact : Ken Cusano, Fire Chief, 916-461-6313 /
[email protected]
535 Glenn Drive, Folsom, California 95630

• Planning and design of Remodel and Addition to an existing One-Story Fire Station (±3,067 square feet).on a +/-0.42 acre site. The City chose to not tear down the existing 1980’s Station, but to be pro-active env ironmentally, and keep the structure.

Facility includes Apparatus Bays (1 x 1 vehicles deep), Administrative Offices, Living Quarters with 4-Person Crew accommodations , Exercise Room, new exterior siding and roofing. Wood Frame construction; +/- 4,524 finish Station.

Project: Folsom Fire Station No. 38 remodel and Addition Location: 1300 Blue Ravine Road
Folsom, California
Primary firm: Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Owner: City of Folsom
Owner’s Designee: • Ken Cusano, Fire Chief
535 Glenn Drive
Folsom, California 95630 / 916-461-6313

Design Services Time: 8 months
Project Status: Construction complete
Cost Estimate: $2,500,000.00 - 2019
Bid Cost: $2,544,000.00 ($520/sf) - 2020
No. of Change Orders: 7
Cost of Change Orders: $6,840.00 (2.7%)
Prime Contractor: PnP Construction
Contractor Project Manager: Nathan Peach
[email protected]

75 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
7 • Yreka Police Department New Station Retrofit
• City of Yreka
• Contact : Dave Gamache, Police Chief, 530-841-230 7/
[email protected]
Yreka Police Department, 1400 Fairlane Road, Yre ka, California 96097

• Retrofit of an existing Commercial Building into new facilities for the Yreka Police Department. Existing building (+/-9,000 sf) was constructed in 2009, and used as a commercial lease space.

Wood Frame, Concrete Slab, Wood Roof Truss constr uction.

Facilities include Administrative Offices, Record s, Dispatch, Patrol, Investigations, Evidence, and an EOC/Training Room. A new exteri or Hall (+/-1,000 sf) was added to improve the flow of internal circulation. Bui lding was upgraded structurally to comply with the Essential Services Act. Site wor k includes Secured Parking, Dog Kennels, and a Carport shelter for the Squad Cars .

Project: Yreka Police Department New Station Retro fit
Location: 1400 Fairlane Road,
Yreka, California
Primary Firm: Calpo Hom & Dong Architects / Dennis Dong Owner: City of Yreka
Owner’s Designee: • Dave Gamache, Police Chief
530-841-2307/
[email protected]

Design Services Time: 12 Months
Construction Status: Construction Completed, Decem ber, 2018 Construction Time: 10 Months
Cost Estimate: $3,040,000.00
Bid Cost: $2,614,500.00
No. of Change Orders: 9
Cost of Change Orders: $64,432.00 (3%)
Prime Contractor: Nichol Construction
Contractor Project Manager: Zack Parsons, 530-941- 4304

76 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
8 • Willits Fire Station No. 54
• Little Lake Fire Protection District
• Contact : Eric Alvarez, Fire Chief, 707-354-4039 /
[email protected]
74 E. Commercial Street, Willits, California 9549 0
• Planning and design of new One-Story Fire Station (±11,063 square feet), for a Volunteer Department. Facility includes Apparatu s Bays (5 x 1 vehicles deep), Administrative Offices, Training/ Community Room , Living Quarters with 4-Person Crew accommodations, Exercise Room, Equipment Tur nout Areas, Decontamination Areas. Pre-Engineered Metal Building constructio n.

Project: Willits Fire Station No. 54
Location: 74 E. Commercial Street
Willits, California 95490
Primary firm: Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Owner: Little Lake Fire Protection District
Owner’s Designee: • John Thomen, Deputy Fire Chief
74 E. Commercial Street
Willits, California 95490/ 707-459-6271

Design Services Time: 10 months
Project Status: Construction complete
Cost Estimate: $5,440,000.00 - 2019
Bid Cost: $5,524,000.00 ($499/sf) - 2020
No. of Change Orders: 7
Cost of Change Orders: $185,915.00 (3.4%)
Prime Contractor: Adams Commercial General Contrac ting Contractor Project Manager: Will Adams, 707.496.33 49

77 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
9 • Winters Police-Fire Facility
• City of Winters Public Safety Department
• Contact : Bruce Muramoto, Fire Chief (ret.),
530-681-2867 /
[email protected]
702 W Main Street, Winters, California 95694

• Planning and design of new Two-Story Joint Police (+/-10,413 square feet) and Fire (±18,141 square feet) Facility (+/-33,458 square feet total).

Fire Station includes Apparatus Bays (4 x 2 vehic les deep), Administrative Offices, Living Quarters with 12-Person Crew acco mmodations, Captain’s Quarters, Training/EOC Room, Exercise Room, Equip ment Turnout Areas, Decontamination Areas, and Training Grounds, with Drafting Pit and Training Tower.

Pre-Engineered Metal Building and Wood Frame cons truction.

Project: Winters Police-Fire Facility
Location: West Main Street and Grant Avenue
Winters, California
Primary firm: Calpo Hom & Dong Architects / Dennis Dong Owner: City of Winters
Owner’s Designee: • Scott Dozier, Fire Chief (Decea sed) Fire Station No. 26
• Bruce Muramoto, Police Chief (Ret)
Winters Police Department
Winters, California 95694 / 530 795-2261

Design Services Time: 8 months
Construction Status: Construction completed Octobe r, 2011 Construction Time: 24 Months
Cost Budget: $8,000,000.00
Bid Cost: $6,366,000.00 ($156/sf)
No. of Change Orders: 141
Cost of Change Orders: $576,016.00
Prime Contractor: Bobo Construction, Elk Grove, Ca lifornia Contractor Project Manager: Chris Baker / 916-685- 2285

78 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
10 A5. Project Understanding and Approach

Every Project must have a reachable GOAL to attain. The RFP addresses the need to “provide Council with objective, profession al analysis to answer key questions before conditions become critical”, by means of a Facility Needs and Feasibility Study for the Suisun City Police and Fire Departments; due to the age and condition of existing Police and Fire facilities, this is a very necessary and attainable GOAL . CH&D Architects agrees with th1s GOAL , and furthermore, to achieve it in a manner that is agreeable and friendly to all parties involved.

CH&D Architects will approach the Suisun City Facility Needs and Feasibility Study in two concurrent Tasks, with each Task establishing Project Deliverables. These Tasks, as described herein, are intended to keep the City Staff informed as well as involved in the process. This is our standard procedure for all of our Projects, and results in timely management, coordination, and deliverables.

CH&D excels in the two areas pertinent to this project:

a. Programming – Task 1
Programming is a specific requirement of this project. We have found from past projects, that it is always beneficial to review the previous programming efforts, to ascertain whether they are still valid, or, as often is the case, whether needs and requirements have changed.

CH&D has the experience in specific programming of Public Safety Facilities for City of Winters, City of Roseville, City of Rio Vista, and City of Firebaugh.

CH&D has the experience of developing Program Studies to use as a tool to determine building footprint requirements, budget projections, and site search. CH&D completed such a Programming effort for the State of California, Office of State Publishing. The resultant book, based on interviews with each department, operations staff, technology staff, and maintenance staff, allows the State to determine a logical building footprint, used to generate preliminary building costs and, in this case, a site search.

79 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
11 Programming is the means with which we create a St affing and Space Needs Analysis. Also referred to as Facility Plan ning, this process is a sequential process which translates organizational , operational, and spatial needs into specific facilities requirement s.

The results of the Programming efforts and recomme ndations can then be used to formulate operational scenarios which p roject the likely parameters of anticipated workload, and in turn th eir impact on staffing, equipment, and facilities requirements.

With these parameters, the Programming and Schemat ic Design efforts will serve to either solidify these commitments, o r cause a re-evaluation of the situation. CH&D is committed to evaluating and determining the best scenarios for a given situation. In orde r to achieve this, we propose the following project approach:

1. Review reports and background information provi ded by the City. Perform an analysis on information that is still valid, that needs to be reanalyzed, or that may need to be di scarded.

Whereas any previous Programming efforts may have been terrific, the key is confirming that these Programming effor ts are still valid.

Often times, program requirements may change: new positions are created, old positions eliminated, new operations philosophies occur. In order to obtain complete “buy-in” from all concerned parties – Owner, Users, Public – and to avoid pote ntial delays in schedule, and potential increases in costs, it is vital to establish a process to reconfirm the Programming effort. Thi s needs to be accomplished first and foremost, to establish the Design Parameters, and may take the form of a workshop and/or intervi ews with each participant group.

2. If deemed necessary, schedule Personal Interviews with each User Group, to determine operations needs, space needs, special equipment requirements, and adjacencies. Determine any historic trends and predictions on future trends.

3. Review findings with each User Group individuall y, then with the entire group as a whole. This allows each group t o 1) have a say in regards to their own sphere of influence; and 2) r ealize the needs of the other User Groups, and how all must intermesh globally.

The resulting Programming should give the project direction The desired result is a “buy-in” to the ideas and direction of the project, from all User Groups

Case History: Roseville
Corporation Yard

CH&D was selected as
Design Architect for the City
of Roseville Corporation
Yard. A Programming Study
and Master Plan had
previously been done by
another firm. The
Programming and Master
Plan was done under the
direction of the then Director
of Public Works; in the
transition to the Design
Phase, the DPW retired, and a
new position, Director of
Central Services, was created
to manage all CIP projects.

During the review of the
previous Programming and
Master Plan efforts, CH&D
noticed some resentment
amongst the supervisors.

When queried, the
supervisors complained they
were not included in the first
go-around, and did not expect
to have their opinions heard.

At this point, CH&D
requested permission to re-
conduct interviews with all of
the User Groups, and to listen
to their input. By the end of
the sessions, all of the User
Groups had bought in to the
process; they may not have
agreed with all of the results,
but they were aware of the
parameters leading to those
results. The project
proceeded much smoother
after that interlude.

80 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
12 b. Building Analyses – Task 2
The RFP does include floor plans of the existing Police Facility and Fire Station 47.

SUISUN CITY POLICE FACILITY EXISTING FLOOR PLAN

SUISUN CITY FIRE STATION 47 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN

Only the existing floor plans were provided; the amount of additional plans was not revealed at this time.

Existing plans complement the Facility Needs and Feasibility Study by providing tangible parameters for the application of the Study to the actual conditions. Floor plans alone are a good start, but not sufficient by themselves to determine the direction of any improvements.

81 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
13 The CH&D Team will first review what documents are available, and then, by site observation and documentation, augment those plans to get a better picture of thr existing conditions and restraints. If no additional plans are available, then the CH&D Team will need to increase their site time to include discovery of the existing building elements.

Specifically, this CH&D Team will include the Architect, Structural Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, and Electrical Engineer. The following information will be researched:

 Structural System
 Mechanical System
 Plumbing System
 Electrical System
 Building and Site Accessibility Compliance
 Title-24 Energy Compliance
 Codes Compliance

The recorded information will be transferred onto an existing electronic CAD file, or, if an existing CAD file is not available, a new CAD file will be created by the Team from the information obtained.

82 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
14 A6. Detailed Work Plan

FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY TEAM (FNFS)
 CH&D ARCHITECTS (CH&D)
 BRUCE MURAMOTO (BM)
 FDC CONSULTANTS (FDC)

FNFS TASKS
A. REVIEW PREVIOUS PROGRAM STUDIES
[ALL – 0-16 HRS, BASED ON AVAILABILITY]
B. INTERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT USER GROUPS
[CH&D + BM – 16 HRS]
C. INTERVIEW FIRE DEPARTMENT USER GROUPS
[CH&D + FDC – 16 HRS]
D. COMPILE DATE
[ALL – 8 HRS]
E. CREATE 50% STUDY
[CH&D – 24 HRS]
F. REVIEW 50% STUDY WITH USER GROUPS
[ALL – 8 HRS]
G. INCORPORATE USER FEEDBACK, CORRECTIONS
[CH&D – 8 HRS]
H. CREATE 90% STUDY
[CH&D – 16 HRS]
I. REVIEW 90% STUDY WITH USER GROUPS
[ALL – 8 HRS]
J. FINALIZE STUDY
[CH&D – 16 HRS]
K. CREATE 100% STUDY
[CH&D – 8 HRS]

EXISTING BUILDING ANALYSES TEAM (EBA)
 CH&D ARCHITECTS CH&D)
 BEVIER STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING (BSE)
 SIGMA ENGINEERING (SIGMA)
 CAPITOL CITY DESIGN (CCD)

EBA TASKS
A. REVIEW EXISTING AS-BUILT PLANS
[ALL – 0-8 HRS]
B. SITE INVESTIGATE EXISTING BUILDING SYSTEMS – POLICE [ALL – 16 HRS]
C. SITE INVESTIGATE EXISTING BUILDING SYSTEMS – FIRE
[ALL – 16 HRS]
D. COMPILE BUILDING INFORMATION
[ALL – 24 HRS]
E. CREATE CAD FILE
[ALL – 16 HRS]

83 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
15 A7. Schedule

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 SUISUN CITY FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY 71 days Mon 5/18/26 Mon 8/24/26 2 3 TASK 1 - FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY
4 Review Previous Program Studies 2 days Mon 5/18/26 Tue 5/19/26 5 Interview Police Department User Groups 14 days Wed 5/20/26 Mon 6/8/26 6 Interview Fire Department Use Groups 14 days Wed 5/20/26 Mon 6/8/26 7 Compile Data 5 days Tue 6/9/26 Mon 6/15/26
8 Create 50% Study 5 days Tue 6/16/26 Mon 6/22/26
9 Review 50% Study with User Groups 7 days Tue 6/23/26 Wed 7/1/26 10 Incorporate User Feeback, Corrections 14 days Thu 7/2/26 Tue 7/21/26 11 Create 90% Study 5 days Wed 7/22/26 Tue 7/28/26
12 Review 90% Study with User Groups 7 days Wed 7/29/26 Thu 8/6/26 13 Finalize Study 7 days Fri 8/7/26 Mon 8/17/26
14 Create 100% Study 5 days Tue 8/18/26 Mon 8/24/26
15 16 Task 2 - Existing Building Analyses
17 Review Existing As-Built Plans 5 days Wed 5/20/26 Tue 5/26/26 18 Site Investigate Existing Building Systems - Police 7 days Wed 5/27/26 Thu 6/4/26 19 Site Investigate Existing Building Systems - Fire 7 days Fri 6/5/26 Mon 6/15/26 20 Compile Building Information 14 days Tue 6/16/26 Fri 7/3/26 21 Create CAD File 14 days Mon 7/6/26 Thu 7/23/26
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
5/10 5/24 6/7 6/21 7/5 7/19 8/2 8/16
May 17, '26 Jun 7, '26 Jun 28, '26 Jul 19, '26 Aug 9, '26 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Deadline
Progress

Page 1 ends

Project: ROCKLIN FD_GANTT CHA
Date: Tue 4/7/26
84 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
16 A8. Other Information : Resumes
Firm Name Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Business Address 2120 20th Street, Suite One
Sacramento, California 95818
Telephone Number 916.446.7741 / 916.236.4288 Fax
Principal Contact Person Dennis Dong (530.305.9129 cell) E-Mail Address [email protected]
Year Established 1984
Type of Organization California Corporation
Federal Tax ID 68-0022849
Calpo Hom & Dong Architects (CH&D ) is a Sacramento-based Architectural, Interiors, and Planning Firm. Founded in 1984, CH&D is managed by five Principal Partners; Dennis Dong, AIA, CSI, Alan C. Hom, AIA, Loangle Newsome, AIA, Andy Kwong, AIA, and Karl Chan. CH&D is headquartered at 2120 20th Street, Suite One, in Sacramento’s Midtown District.

CH&D offers the full range of Architectural Services, including Master Planning, Feasibility Studies, Design, Interior Design, Space Planning, Construction Administration, Historic Preservation, and Consulting Services.

Our portfolio includes Public and Private development for Administrative and Support Facilities for Public and Private Agencies, Essential Services Buildings for Fire Departments and Law Enforcement Agencies, Community Buildings, Schools and Colleges, Commercial Office and Retail Buildings, Multi-Use Facilities, Industrial Projects, Renovation and Adaptive Reuse, and Multiple Housing.

As general practitioners of Architecture, CH&D has designed a widely diverse range of projects, each allowing a different viewpoint to Design Solutions.

These different viewpoints, collectively, allow us to foresee a myriad of opportunities within each individual project. CH&D sees this diversity as advantageous to the City of Suisun City Facilities Needs and Feasibility Study , with its need to appeal to a variety of Users.

85 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
17 • DENNIS DONG, AIA, CSI

With over thirty years of experience, Dennis Dong has been involved in all aspects of several major and diverse projects. Through his involvement with projects, he has developed a strong sensitivity to programming and design issues and techniques. He is responsible for critical project aspects related to the accurate translation of design requirements into workable and efficient floor plans.

Currently, Dennis Dong is working with the Williams Fire Protection Authority, for the construction of their new Fire Station, and the El Dorado Irrigation District, for the programming of alternate solutions for their Corporation Yard. Dennis Dong will provide overall direction and coordination for the duration of the Project.

Dennis Dong will be Principal-In-Charge and Projec t Manager for this Project.

Dennis Dong will be fully available to the extent proposed for the duration of the required services, and shall not be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City of Suisun City.

• Bachelor of Arts in Architecture,
University of California, Berkeley, 1972

• Registered Architect, California: C12,163
• Registered Architect, Nevada: 2,047
• Registered Architect, Arizona: 21,630
• Registered Architect, Oregon: 3,917
• Registered Architect, Montana: 2,119
• Registered Architect, Ohio: 1115287
• Registered Architect, Iowa: ARC79678
• Registered Architect, NCARB: 34,789
• LEED™ BD+C

Note: All Registrations are current.

• Member, American Institute of Architects (AIA)
• Member, Construction Specifications Institute (CS I)
• Member, National Trust for Historic Preservation

• Recent Relevant Project Experience :
• Firebaugh Public Safety Facility : Space Study
• Roseville Police Facility: Space Study and Design
• Lincoln Public Safety Facility: Space Study and Design • Winters Public Safety Facility Space Study and Des ign • Yreka Police Facility Space Study and Design
• West Sacramento Police Facility Improvements: De sign • CHP Bakersfield Field and Dispatch Office: Desig n
• Tuolumne Utilities District Centralized Facility
Space Study and Design
• Central Contra Costa Sanitation District CSO Fac ility Space Study and Design
• State of California Printing Plant : Space Study
• Roseville Fire Administration : Space Study an d Design • Roseville IT Department : Space Study

Dennis Dong has
been personally
involved with the
design of new
Public Safety
Facilities for the
Cities of Roseville,
Lincoln, Yreka,
Folsom, Napa,
Ceres, El Dorado
Hills, West
Sacramento, and
Winters, Williams,
Smith River, and
Bakersfield

86 Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
18 BRUCE K. MURAMOTO
Progressive Manager with a distinguished record of success in developing and implementing organizational change and cultivating strong community/business relations. Strong organizational leadership, administrative, analytical and research skills, combined with proven expertise in project and crisis management. Proven ability to develop positive working relationships among local law enforcement organizations and private/public sector agencies, which enhance the quality of law enforcement to the community. Sensitive to needs of a diverse community. Areas of expertise:

• Community Oriented Policing Strategies
• Grant Solicitation/Proposals
• Budget Administration/Management
• Policy/Procedure Development
• Expert on Diversity/Human Relations
• Project Manager: Construction of two police facilities

Chief of Police, Winters Police Department 2004- 2011 City of Winters, California
• Performed a variety of complex administrative, managerial and professional work in planning, coordinating and directing the activities of the Police Department. • Plans, coordinates, manages and evaluates police department operations. • Project Manager for the planning, design, bidding and construction of new Police/Fire Facility.
• Represented California Chiefs of Police as a member in the following statewide committees:
o Governor’s Commission on High Technology Crime
o California’s Emergency Management Committee on Rad io Inoperability

Police Lieutenant/Commander-Office of Support Servi ces 2002 to 2004 City of West Sacramento Police Department, West Sac ramento, California • Conduct extensive research, disseminate information , author various proposals and grant solicitations, securing critical funding for program and capital expansion. • Continue to serve as Project Manager for the depart ment's multi-agency technology grant.

Project includes systems for records management and automated field report writing. • Continue to serve as Project Manager for the depart ment's 800 MHz radio system. Also serves as the City's representative for the Sacrame nto Regional Radio Communication System and Finance Committee.
• Responsible for overseeing all aspects of technolog y use and development for the department.

Police Lieutenant/Commander-Office of Operations 2001 to 2002 City of West Sacramento Police Department, West Sac ramento, California

Police Lieutenant/Commander-Office of Support Servi ces 1994 to 2001 City of West Sacramento Police Department, West Sac ramento, California • Project Manager for the planning, bidding and construction of new Police facility.

Police Lieutenant/Commander-Office of Operations 1988 to 1994 City of West Sacramento Police Department, West Sac ramento, California

PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATES
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training
Basic, 1975 Intermediate, 1976
Advanced, 1980 Supervisory, 1984

• Regionalization/Partnerships
• Technology/Automation
• Training/Personnel Development
• Personnel Administration/Discipline
• Recruitment/Retention
• Presenter on Hate Crimes and Racial Profiling 87
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
19 Fred H Russell III

Statement of Qualifications and Experience

FDC Consultants is locally based in El Dorado Count y and is an individually owned and operated professional consulting company that specializes in Design, Bid, and Build Fire Service related projects, and is committed to ensuring the successful completion of every project they are involved with.

The Project and Construction Management Services pr ovided by FDC Consultants are all inclusive to every project. These services start at the programming stage with the client and the Architect, and continue through each phase of Design, Bidding, Construction, and Post Construction close out of the project.

Additional services provided includes, developing and soliciting Request for Proposals for project required services, Project Inspector of Record services, budgeting, developing master and capital improvement planning for future facilities.

I am recognized by the El Dorado County Building Of ficial and the City of Folsom to act as the Inspector of Record for Essential Service Proje cts constructed within these jurisdictions.

I have 30 plus years of experience of interpreting and enforcing the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, National Fire Code and Standards in construction related activities, along with previous certification as a “Commercial Building Inspector” through I.C.C.

FDC Consultants has demonstrated its commitment over the past 10 plus year to providing its clients with cost effective construction management services by completing 75% of the project constructed during this period with 1% or less of additional change order cost to the General Contractors contract.

Mr. Russell served for 23 years with the El Dorado Hills Fire Department in the position of Division Chief Fire Marshal. His responsibilities included fiscal, managerial, oversight of the Fire Prevention Bureau, development plan review and fire code enforcement, and fire protection planning for all commercial and residential development.

When Mr. Russell began his employment with El Dorad o Hills Fire Department in June 1984, the population of the rural community of El Dorado Hills was approximately 9,000 with a commercial occupancy base of less than 50,000 squar e feet. Upon his retirement, this rural community had grown to a small city with a population of approximately 40,000 and a commercial occupancy base of 5.2 million square feet.

Mr. Russell’s knowledge and leadership experience e xtends well beyond his position as Fire Marshal to include Fire Department operational areas such as the development of a Facility Master Plan that ensures that the current and future demands of an expanding community are adequately address by the Fire Department. The responsibilities of this Facility Master Plan, implemented by Mr. Russell, included land acquisitions, fiscal management and oversight of each project, the development of construction documents, acquiring all the necessary permits and approvals for each project, and the construction management of each project during the construction process.

88 SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 16 of 21 EXHIBIT “B” (Page 1 of 1) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Consultant will provide professional liability insurance in the amount of $2 Million.

Waive the performance bond (Section 5.3)

89 SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 17 of 21 EXHIBIT “C” (Page 1 of 1) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION

(See next page.)

90 SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Option One Option Two Subtotals
Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
16 $3,760.00 4 $940.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Manager 195.00 40 $7,800.00 16 $3,120.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 40 $5,400.00 40 $5,400.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 115.00 16 $1,840.00 8 $920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 112 $18,800.00 68 $10,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $29,180.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,960.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 40 $4,600.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 0 $0.00 60 $8,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,960.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 40 $4,600.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 0 $0.00 60 $8,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,960.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 40 $4,600.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 0 $0.00 60 $8,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
24 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 0 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $4,920.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
24 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 24 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $4,920.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 136 $28,640.00 248 $35,520.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0. 00 0 $0.00 TOTAL $64,160.00
91 SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Review Prev Studies Interview PD Interv iew FD Compile Data Create 50% Study Review 50% Study S ubtotals Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
2 $470.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00
Project Manager 195.00 2 $390.00 12 $2,340.00 12 $2,340.00 0 $0.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,160.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 8 $1,400.00 12 $2,340.00 12 $2,340.00 16 $2,160.00 16 $2,320.00 4 $860.00 $11,420.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
4 $820.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 4 $820.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 $4,100.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
4 $820.00 0 $0.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 $4,100.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 16 $3,040.00 24 $4,800.00 24 $4,800.00 16 $2,160. 00 24 $3,960.00 4 $860.00 TOTAL $19,620.00
92 SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Incorporate Feedback Create 90% Study R eview 90% Study Finalize Study Create 100% Study Subto tals Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
2 $470.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00 0 $0.00 Project Manager 195.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 0 $0.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 4 $540.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 4 $540.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 115.00 0 $0.00 4 $460.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $460.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 8 $1,400.00 12 $1,860.00 4 $860.00 8 $1,400.00 12 $1,860.00 0 $0.00 $7,380.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 $820.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 $820.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 8 $1,400.00 16 $2,680.00 4 $860.00 8 $1,400.00 16 $ 2,680.00 0 $0.00 TOTAL $9,020.00
93 SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Review (E) As-Builts Site Investigate PD Site Investigate FD Compile Bldg Info Create CAD fi les Subtotals Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $940.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Manager 195.00 4 $780.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 4 $780.00 4 $780.00 0 $0.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 0 $0.00 8 $1,080.00 8 $1,080.00 8 $1,080.00 16 $2,160.00 0 $0.00 \ Clerical 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $460.00 4 $460.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 4 $780.00 10 $1,470.00 10 $1,470.00 20 $3,260.00 24 $3,400.00 0 $0.00 $10,380.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 4 $740.00 2 $370.00 2 $370.00 4 $740.00 4 $740.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 16 $1,840.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 4 $740.00 10 $1,290.00 10 $1,290.00 16 $2,480.00 20 $2,580.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 4 $740.00 2 $370.00 2 $370.00 4 $740.00 4 $740.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 16 $1,840.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 4 $740.00 10 $1,290.00 10 $1,290.00 16 $2,480.00 20 $2,580.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 4 $740.00 2 $370.00 2 $370.00 4 $740.00 4 $740.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 16 $1,840.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 4 $740.00 10 $1,290.00 10 $1,290.00 16 $2,480.00 20 $2,580.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 16 $3,000.00 40 $5,340.00 40 $5,340.00 68 $10,700 .00 84 $11,140.00 0 $0.00 TOTAL $35,520.00
94 SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 18 of 21 EXHIBIT “D” (Page 1 of 1) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE

95 ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 SUISUN CITY FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY 71 days Mon 5/18/26 Mon 8/24/26 2 3 TASK 1 - FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY
4 Review Previous Program Studies 2 days Mon 5/18/26 Tue 5/19/26 5 Interview Police Department User Groups 14 days Wed 5/20/26 Mon 6/8/26 6 Interview Fire Department Use Groups 14 days Wed 5/20/26 Mon 6/8/26 7 Compile Data 5 days Tue 6/9/26 Mon 6/15/26
8 Create 50% Study 5 days Tue 6/16/26 Mon 6/22/26
9 Review 50% Study with User Groups 7 days Tue 6/23/26 Wed 7/1/26 10 Incorporate User Feeback, Corrections 14 days Thu 7/2/26 Tue 7/21/26 11 Create 90% Study 5 days Wed 7/22/26 Tue 7/28/26
12 Review 90% Study with User Groups 7 days Wed 7/29/26 Thu 8/6/26 13 Finalize Study 7 days Fri 8/7/26 Mon 8/17/26
14 Create 100% Study 5 days Tue 8/18/26 Mon 8/24/26
15 16 Task 2 - Existing Building Analyses
17 Review Existing As-Built Plans 5 days Wed 5/20/26 Tue 5/26/26 18 Site Investigate Existing Building Systems - Police 7 days Wed 5/27/26 Thu 6/4/26 19 Site Investigate Existing Building Systems - Fire 7 days Fri 6/5/26 Mon 6/15/26 20 Compile Building Information 14 days Tue 6/16/26 Fri 7/3/26 21 Create CAD File 14 days Mon 7/6/26 Thu 7/23/26
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
5/10 5/24 6/7 6/21 7/5 7/19 8/2 8/16
May 17, '26 Jun 7, '26 Jun 28, '26 Jul 19, '26 Aug 9, '26 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Deadline
Progress

Page 1 ends

Project: ROCKLIN FD_GANTT CHA
Date: Tue 4/7/26
96 SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 19 of 21 EXHIBIT “E” (Page 1 of 3) TO Contract Services Agreement
With “Company”

EXHIBIT “E”

PROVISIONS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE SECTION 1720 ET SEQ.

HOURS OF WORK:

A. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1810, 8 hours of labor in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall constitute a legal day’s work under this contract.

B. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1811, the time of service of any worker employed in performance of the services described in Exhibit A is limited to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours during any one calendar week, except in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1815, which provides that work in excess of eight hours during any one calendar day and forty hours during any one calendar week is permitted upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours during any one calendar day and forty hours during any one calendar week at not less than one-and-one-half times the basic rate of pay.

C. The Consultant and its subconsultants shall forfeit as a penalty to the City $25 for each worker employed in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day, or more than 40 hours in any one calendar week, in violation of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1810 and following.

WAGES:

A. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1773.2, the City has determined the general prevailing wages in the locality in which the services described in Exhibit A are to be performed for each craft or type of work needed to be as published by the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Statistics and Research, a copy of which is on file in the City Public Works Office and shall be made available on request. The Consultant and subconsultants engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall pay no less than these rates to all persons engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A.

B. In accordance with Labor Code Section 1775, the Consultant and any subconsultants engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall comply Labor Code Section 1775, which establishes a penalty of up to $50 per day for each worker engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A that the Consultant or any subconsultant pays less than the specified prevailing wage. The amount of such penalty shall be determined by the Labor Commissioner and shall be based on consideration of the mistake, inadvertence, or neglect of the Consultant or subconsultant in failing to pay the correct rate of prevailing wages, or the previo us record of the 97 SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 20 of 21 EXHIBIT “E” (Page 1 of 3) TO Contract Services Agreement
With “Company”

Consultant or subconsultant in meeting applicable prevailing wage obligations, or the willful failure by the Consultant or subconsultant to pay the correct rates of prevailing wages. A mistake, inadvertence, or neglect in failing to pay the correct rate of prevailing wages is not excusable if the Consultant or subconsultant had knowledge of their obligations under the California Labor Code. The Consultant or subconsultant shall pay the difference between the prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to ea ch worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate. If a subconsultant worker engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A is not paid the general prevailing per diem wages by the subconsultant, the Consultant is not liable for any penalties therefore unless the Consultant had knowledge of that failure or unless the Consultant fails to comply with all of the following requirements:

1. The contract executed between the Consultant and the subconsultant for the performance of part of the services described in Exhibit A shall include a copy of the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1771, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815.

2. The Consultant shall monitor payment of the specified general prevailing rate of per diem wages by the subconsultant by periodic review of the subconsultant’s certified payroll records.

3. Upon becoming aware of a subconsultant’s failure to pay the specified prevailing rate of wages, the Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify the failure, including, but not limited to, retaining sufficient funds due the subconsultant for performance of the services described in Exhibit A.

4. Prior to making final payment to the subconsultant, the Consultant shall obtain an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury from the subconsultant that the subconsultant has paid the specified general prevailing rate of per diem wages for employees engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A and any amounts due pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1813.

C. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1776, the Consultant and each subconsultant engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall keep accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed i n performance of the services described in Exhibit A. Each payroll record shall contain or be veri fied by a written declaration that it is made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following:

98 SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 21 of 21 EXHIBIT “E” (Page 1 of 3) TO Contract Services Agreement
With “Company”

1. The information contained in the payroll record is true and correct.

2. The employer has complied with the requirements of Sections 1771, 1811, and 1815 for any work performed by the employer’s employees on the public works project.

The payroll records required pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1776 shall be certified and shall be available for inspection by the Owner and its authorized representatives, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial Relations and shall otherwise be available for inspection in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1776.

D. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1777.5, the Consultant, on behalf of the Consultant and any subconsultants engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A, shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with California Labor Code Section 1777.5 governing employment and payment of apprentices on public works contracts.

E. In case it becomes necessary for the Consultant or any subconsultant engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A to employ for the services described in Exhibit A any person in a trade or occupation (except executive, supervisory, administrative, clerical, or other non manual workers as such) for which no minimum wage rate has been determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, the Consultant shall pay the minimum rate of wages specified therein for the classification which most nearly corresponds to services described in Exhibit A to be performed by that person. The minimum rate thus furnished shall be applicable as a minimum for such trade or occupation from the time of the initial employment of the person affected and during the continuance of such employment.

99 DEPARTMENTS: AREA CODE (707)
ADMINISTRATION 421-7300 ◼ PLANNING 421-7200 ◼ BUILDING 421-7310 ◼ FINANCE 431-7320 FIRE 425-9133 ◼ RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 421-7200 ◼ POLICE 421-7373 ◼ PUBLIC WORKS 421-7340 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 421-7309 ◼ FAX 421-7366

CITY COUNCIL
Alma Hernandez, Mayor
Jenalee Dawson, Mayor ProTem
Amit Pal
Parise Shepherd
Princess Washington

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
First and Third Tuesday
Every Month

CITY OF SUISUN CITY

701 Civic Center Blvd.

Suisun City, California 94585

Incorporated October 9, 1868

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
First and Third Tuesday
Every Month

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
First and Third Tuesday
Every Month
Request for Proposal (RFP) for
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

DATE: DATE: February 25, 2026

Request for Proposals: Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting: Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 10:00 AM Suisun City Hall Council Chambers
701 Civic Center Blvd.

Suisun City, CA 94585

Last Day for Questions: Tuesday, March 18, 2026, at 4:00 PM

PROPOSAL DUE DATE: Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at 4:00 PM

General: The Suisun City Public Works Department seeks proposals for a Facility Needs and Feasibility Study at the for the following locations:
• Police Department,701 Civic Center Boulevard
• Fire Station, 621 Pintail Drive

Project Description:

Police Department:

The Suisun City Police Department operates from a facility that was designed for a significantly smaller workforce, limited technology, and a narrower scope of services than what is required today.

Over time, incremental staffing increases, technological m odernization, and evolving regulatory requirements have placed increasing strain on the physical building.

100
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 2 ends

2 Historically, space limitations were treated as a long-term planning concern. However, recent staffing additions, upcoming hiring plans, and new state mandates have accelerated the issue to the point where the existing facility can no longer reliably support current operations without increased risk.

Additionally, future development scenarios (including potential long-range growth tied to regional development projects) introduce uncertainty regarding long-term facility needs. While those projects may ultimately inform permanent solutions, the Police Department must still address immediate and mid-term operational capacity challenges.

The City would like to conduct a Police Department Facilities Needs and Feasibility Study to objectively evaluate the City’s current police facility and identify viable options to support operations, compliance, and anticipated staffing growth.

This request is driven by several converging factors:

1. Staffing Growth and Space Constraints
The Police Department has reached functional capacity in key areas, including locker rooms, workstations, and administrative space. Both sworn and professional staff additions now immediately strain available space, creating employee relations, wellness, and operational efficiency concerns.

Without a facilities reconfiguration plan, continued hiring will compound these constraints and reduce the Department’s ability to deploy staff effectively.

2. State and Regulatory Requirements
Recent statewide mandates, most notably Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) requirements effective January 1, 2027, cannot be met within the current dispatch center configuration. The existing layout does not support required staffing levels, security standards, or operational separation between dispatch, records, and public access.

Absent a facility reconfiguration plan, the City faces increased legal, compliance, and operational risk.

3. Technology and Infrastructure Limitations
Modern policing increasingly relies on technology such as body -worn cameras, digital evidence systems, radio infrastructure, drones, and upgraded 911 systems. The Police Department’s server rooms and technology spaces are at or near capacity, with documented concerns related to code compliance, safety, and vendor access.

Future system upgrades may be delayed or compromised without appropriate facility improvements.

4. Property and Evidence Capacity
Both on -site and off -site evidence storage facilities are at maximum capacity. Current conditions raise concerns related to chain of custody, staff safety, long -term evidence 101
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 3 ends

3 integrity, and courtroom defensibility. Additional field staffing will continue to generate evidence volume beyond what the current facilities can accommodate.

5. Risk of Reactive, High-Cost Solutions
Without a deliberate planning effort, the City risks being forced into short-notice, high-cost interim measures, such as temporary structures or fragmented off-site operations, that may undermine efficiency, collaboration, and long-term fiscal prudence.

Fire Station:

The City of Suisun City located in Solano County, California serves a population of approximately 30,000 residents. The Suisun City Fire Department (SCFD) is an All-Hazard department responding to all types of emergencies including but not limited to: fire, medical, motor vehicle accidents, hazardous materials, and technical rescue (high/low rope rescue, confined space/trench and water). SCFD operates out of a single fire station centrally located at 621 Pintail Drive and is staffed 24/7 with two engine Advanced Life Support (ALS) companies housing 5 firefighters daily. The department administration consists of a Fire Chief, Deputy Fire Chief, Fire Marshal and an Administrative Technician working a typical 40 hour week.

Operations staff consist of 13 career firefighters, 10 reserve volunteers staffing three shifts, A, B, and C 365 days a year.

In 2025, SCFD responded to 3,487 calls for service with 2,547 (73%) being emergency medical service (EMS) and 132 (4%) fire related emergencies.

The current fire station was built in 1982 as a second fire station for a cost of approximately $166,850 and is approximately 5,000 square feet with a living space of 2,000 sq. ft. The two- door apparatus bay is two-deep and houses two Type I engines, one aerial ladder truck, one Type III wildland engine, and one boat trailer. Other vehicles stored outside parking consist of one Type V engine, one Air Light unit, one Urban Search and Rescue trailer, and five staff and utility vehicles. In 2019, the department transitioned into a 24-hour model staffed fire department where the fire station had gone through renovations to make accommodation for its transition.

Over the years, the Fire Department has renovated and expanded its facilities to meet operational needs. These efforts include the addition of a portable construction trailer housing the Deputy Chief of Operations and Training and the Fire Marshal’s offices. In addition, a portable training room acquired from a local school was co-located on site to provide supplemental space for training, office functions, and expanded dormitory needs. Increased call volume and response times have significantly diminished our response time performance metrics well below industry standards exceeding 6 minutes travel times. The addition of a second fire station is identified as a critical need to better serve our community.

The City of Suisun City is seeking an innovative consulting firm with demonstrated experience in developing both long-term strategic solutions and near-term opportunities for the renovation and expansion of existing fire station facilities, as well as the planning and development of a second fire station utilizing temporary or modular design concepts. The scope of work includes, but is not limited to, the following:

102
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 4 ends

4 Scope of Work

1. Data Collection and Review
Gather and analyze all relevant data and background information necessary to support the feasibility study. The consultant shall be responsible for all costs associated with obtaining third-party data, records, or reports.

2. Stakeholder Coordination
Collaborate with Fire Department staff, Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) staff, the Public Works Director, and other relevant City departments to collect information and evaluate current and projected needs related to fire station facilities, staffing, and apparatus deployment.

3. Operational and Facility Assessment
Conduct an operational efficiency evaluation and comprehensive assessment of the existing fire station, including a site inspection to identify current building conditions.

The evaluation shall address, at a minimum:
o Structural integrity
o Building design and layout
o Expansion potential
o HVAC systems
o Energy efficiency
o Electrical systems
o Space and storage capacity
o Emergency power capabilities
o Presence of hazardous materials (e.g., asbestos)
Based on this assessment, develop recommendations for remodeling, renovation, expansion, or construction of a new facility at the current location. a. Provide order-of-magnitude cost estimates for remodeling, renovating, or expanding existing Fire Station 47.
b. Provide order-of-magnitude cost estimates for construction of a temporary second fire station at a selected location.

4. Future Fire Station Planning and Siting
103
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 5 ends

5 Evaluate and recommend future fire station location(s) and develop a phased implementation strategy for station planning, design, and construction. The analysis shall be data-driven and comprehensive, considering operational, demographic, and geographic factors, including but not limited to:
• Existing and planned land use patterns
• Current population and projected growth
• Development density and service demand distribution
• Physical, environmental, and geographic constraints
• Planned residential, commercial, and industrial development • Current and future school sites and community facilities • Transportation networks, traffic patterns, and access routes • Apparatus, equipment, and resource deployment needs
• Fire Department call volume, response times, and emergency demand by service area

5. Second Fire Station – Temporary and Alternative Facility Solutions Develop innovative, flexible, and cost-effective options for implementing a second fire station, including temporary, modular, or alternative public safety facility concepts. The analysis shall include high-level cost estimates for planning, design, and construction, along with recommended staffing configurations and deployment strategies to support efficient, scalable, and sustainable fire protection and emergency response services.

Purpose of the Study:

The proposed study would provide Council with objective, professional analysis to answer key questions before conditions become critical, including:
• Whether the existing building can be reconfigured or expanded to meet short- and mid-term needs;
• The feasibility and cost implications of vertical expansion, interior reconfiguration, or interim solutions;
• Facility requirements needed to meet EMD mandates, technology growth, and evidence standards;
• How to best align near-term and mid-term needs with long-term development scenarios; and • Risks, costs, and operational impacts associated with delaying action.

Importantly, the study would not recommend a single outcome but instead provide the City with options, cost ranges, and risk assessments to support informed policy decisions.

The RFP and attachments are available on our website for download at www.suisun.com at City of Suisun Procurement Portal.

Submittal Requirements:

All proposal submittal packages and all Requests for Information (RFIs) shall be submitted exclusively through the City’s OpenGov portal at www.suisun.com to be eligible for consideration.

Submittals transmitted by any other means will not be accepted or reviewed. 104
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 6 ends

6 Prospective bidders are solely responsible for regularly monitoring the OpenGov portal for the issuance of addenda, clarifications, or other updates related to this solicitation. Addenda issued through the portal shall be considered an integral part of the solicitation documents.

Failure to submit required materials through the designated portal, or failure to review and acknowledge issued addenda, may result in the bid being deemed non -responsive and subject to disqualification.

The nature and form of response is at the discretion of those responding but shall include the information listed below. Additional information submitted after the formal closing date and time will not be accepted. Prospective proposers are highly encouraged to visit the job site prior to submitting a proposal.

Proposals must be:
• Be as brief as possible and not include any unnecessary promotional material. • The Proposals are not to exceed twenty (20) one-sided pages including all responses, reference work, and information about the firm and individuals assigned to the Project. The following items are not included as part of the 20-page total requirement: title page, table of content, cost proposal, resumes, drawings and dividers.

All submissions shall become the property of the City. Furthermore, all submitted proposals, documents and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public record upon their delivery to the City.

A prospective proposer may withdraw its proposal by written request at any time prior to the scheduled closing time for receipt of proposals. Such written request is to be directed to Gemma Geluz at [email protected].

A. Proposal Submittal Requirements

The Cost Proposal for the Project must be submitted as a separate file from the proposal.

The proposal shall contain the following minimum information:
• Cover Letter
• Executive Summary
• Project Team
• Key Personnel References
• Project Understanding and Approach
• Detailed Work Plan
• Project Schedule
• Other Information

The body of the proposal shall include, but not limited to, the following minimum information:

105
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 7 ends

7 A1. Cover Letter

This section shall include a brief summary of the Proposal and Proposer ’s overall organization, firm’s qualifications and areas of practice and stability. Describe the scope of services provided by your firm without the use of outside consultants.

Describe any subcontract arrangements or licensing agreements. Include any potential conflict of interest.

The Proposer shall list any lawsuit or litigation and the result of that action resulting from any job undertaken by the firm or by its sub-consultants which is still pending or has occurred on projects within the last five years.

The letter shall be signed by an official with the authority to negotiate and contractually bind the firm with the City of Suisun City regarding the RPP. Provide name, title, work address, email and telephone number of this officer.

A2. Executive Summary

This section shall include summary and explanation of key provisions of Proposal , emphasizing the approach and methodology to be taken and including a work plan, schedule, and description of the capabilities of the consultant and subconsultants. The summary should convey an understanding of the purpose of the Project and the services required for performance.

A3. Project Team

This section shall describe your team organization, including the qualifications of the prime consultant and any subconsultants. Provide an organizational chart of the proposed team structure.

The Proposer’s Project Manager and key individuals who will be assigned to the Project will be considered an important factor by the selection committee. Include a brief resume of each individual who will work on this assignment. Proposer must also provide a minimum of three client references for the key technical personnel. There can be no change of key perso nnel during the course of the P roject without the prior written approval from the Public Works Director.

The Proposer’s team shall have experience necessary to prepare, administer, coordinate and process the documents described in the scope of services.

The City has also great interest in the quality of all sub -consultants that the prime consultant may engage on this Project. The City expects the prime Consultant to take the lead role in this P roject and to contract with and manage sub -consultants. The Proposer’s choice of sub -consultants will be critical. The City retains the right to approve/disapprove of sub -consultants selected by the Proposer for this Project. 106
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 8 ends

8 Provide names, addresses, telephone numbers, background qualifications and the scope of services that will be provided by all sub-consultants proposed to be used.

The submittal is to list job classifications and anticipated task for each job classification, as well as anticipated hours for each task.

The following are to be addressed in this section:
• Demonstrate experience in each of the areas of expertise needed to successfully complete the Project. This should include a description of prior experience in working with public agencies.
• Provide references with emphasis on the completion of projects related to pedestrian improvements with similar challenges (please provide list with proposals).
• Ability of project team to perform the proposed work within the time limits of the Project, considering their current and projected workload and assignments. • Ability to provide quality control of all deliverables and be responsive to all issues in a timely manner.
• Ability to track team hours worked and provide invoices in a timely manner.

A4. Key Personnel References

Proposer must submit information substantiating its recent experience in successfully providing design of facilities similar to size, complexity, and nature of the services required of this Project , including a minimum of three client references with contact information. List references for the similar projects including the project name, project description, and contact information of agency’s Project Manager, and the date of completion. Indicate your firm's specific responsibilities, total project cost for each of the projects and the percentage of work for which your firm was responsible. Give a brief statement of your firm's adherence to the schedule, budget and construction estimate for each project.

A5. Project Understanding and Approach

The Proposer is to provide his understanding of the needs of the Project and approach to meeting the project goals and objectives. In this section, the Proposer is to describe his understanding of the needs of the Project and demonstrate his understanding of the Project by defining the approach the Proposer will use to meet the project goals and objectives. The Proposer is to explain his approach to the design process and address how the Proposer will move the design process along in an efficient and effective manner.

The Proposer is encouraged to visit the project site prior to preparing proposal. Also, the Proposer may submit drawings of conceptual plans, layout, and details as part of demonstrating their understanding of the Project.

A6. Detailed Work Plan
107
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 9 ends

9 Proposer is to provide a proposed work plan for development and implementation of the Project. Describe how the team will complete each task without simply repeating the listed tasks. Alternative approaches to the Project can be submitted if a rationale is given for the suggested changes.

Include a list of work tasks necessary to complete the services and their descriptions; a list of the permits, authorizations and notifications required for the Project; and an outline of all deliverables.

Identify all key team members, including subcontractors, in a work chart, including their name, title, hours per task, and percentage of work by task.

A7. Project Schedule

Proposer is to detail in his schedule the time required to complete each task in the scope.

Moreover, the Consultant is to provide an estimate of the amount of time each job classification (including all sub -consultants) will devote to each task. Show ta sks, phases, durations, milestones, assignments, critical paths, and other relevant data, including stated assumptions, inclusions, and exclusions.

A8. Other Information

Proposer may use this section to include additional information that might aid the City’s Selection Committee in determining the Proposer’s qualifications for the Project and evaluating its approach to the scope of services.

Cost Proposal will remain sealed until after the Selection Committee has completed their ranking evaluation of all proposals.

This Solicitation does not commit Suisun City to award a contract, to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of proposals, or to procure or contract for the services solicited. The City has the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any minor irregularities, to cancel in part or whole this solicitation if it is in the best interests of the City, and to award a contract that will be most advantageous for the City.

The City of Suisun City is an affirmative action and equal opportunity agency.

Deadline for any questions is Tuesday, March 17, 2026, at 4:00 PM.

It is the responsibility of the Consultant to check the City’s website for issuance of addendum or clarification related to the RFP. Questions submitted after 4 pm on March 17, 2026, may not receive a response prior to proposal opening, unless subsequently modified by the City by addendum.

108
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 10 ends

10 RFPs are due on Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at 4:00 PM at Suisun City Hall, 701 Civic Center Boulevard, Suisun City, CA 94585.

Please direct all questions or proposals to:

Gemma Geluz
Public Works Administrative Technician
(707) 421-7340
Email: [email protected]

Mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting:

A mandatory pre -bid meeting will be held at the time, date, and location specified above.

Attendance at this meeting is required as a condition of the proposal. Proposals submitted by firms that do not have a representative attend the mandatory pre-proposal meeting will be deemed non- responsive and will not be considered. It is the proposer’s responsibility to ensure that attendance is properly recorded at the meeting.

Late submissions will not be accepted.

Proposal Evaluation and Rating Criteria:

The City’s evaluation team will review each Proposal for completeness and content, and will be evaluated and scored on a 100 -point total basis using the below criteria to determine which Proposal provides the best value and is the most beneficial for the City and Project. Points will be awarded based on the information provided in the Proposal and relative to meeting the City’s best interest.

• Qualification and experience of the firm 0 - 10
• Qualifications and experience of key personnel 0 - 15 • Demonstrated success with preparing Facility Needs and Feasibility Study for similar projects 0 - 20
• Perceived ability to perform work in a timely and cost effective manner 0 - 15 • Understanding of project and proposed work approach 0 - 35 • The responsiveness and overall quality of Proposal 0 - 5

The City reserves the right to seek supplemental information from any Proposer at any time after review of the Proposals and before award of any Agreement.

If deemed necessary by the City’s Selection Committee, oral interviews will follow the evaluation of the proposals. The selection of firms for oral interviews will be based on the ranking given by the Selection Committee after reviewing the submitted prop osals. The City may conduct interviews with some or all of the firms who submit proposals, or it may complete its evaluation based on the proposals alone.

Project Schedule:

The tentative schedule for awarding the Contract at a City Council meeting is April 2026. 109
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 11 ends

11 The Project is expected to be completed in accordance with the following schedule:
• Kick-off Meeting & Begin Study April 27, 2026
• Submittal of 50% Study Document June 4, 2026
• City Comments to 50% Study Document June 14, 2026
• Submittal of 90% Study Document July 14, 2026
• City Comments to 90% Study Document July 21, 2026
• Submittal of Final Study Document August 7, 2026

Negotiations:

The City will negotiate with the first-ranked firm to secure an agreement. If negotiations with the first-ranked firm are unsuccessful, negotiations will be formally terminated, and staff shall then begin negotiating with the next ranked firm. This process shall continue until an agreement is secured.

The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received, and to reissue a new Request for Proposals. Moreover, the City reserves the right to cancel the Project at any point and pay Consultant only for costs incurred to that point and for work completed which is usable by the City as determined by the City.

The City also reserves the right to award subsequent contracts for additional work to the selected Consultant (if a selection is made) or to another Consultant who has submitted a proposal for this solicitation.

The prospective Consultant is advised that the contract will not be in force until it is approved and fully executed by the City of Suisun City. The Consultant will be required to satisfy all insurance certification and Suisun City Business License requirements prior to the City’s issuance of a Notice to Proceed. Work done before issuance of a Notice to Proceed cannot be billed to the City.

City’s Contract Services Agreement:

The successful Consultant will be required to execute a contract with the City of Suisun City.

Attached for review is the City’s standard Contract Services Agreement (Attachment B).

Proposers shall provide a statement that they have reviewed the agreement , and if selected, will execute the agreement. In addition, Proposers shall declare any exceptions or desired modifications to the agreement that the proposer considers absolutely necessary in order to execute the agreement. The City will consider any re asonable exceptions or desired modifications; however, if the requests are not acceptable to the City, the proposer shall accept the agreement without the desired changes or the City may choose to negotiate an agreement with another Proposer.

Attachments:

Attachment A – Location Maps
Attachment B – Fire Department Response Time Maps and Stats Attachment C – Standard Contract Services Agreement
110
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 12 ends

12 Attachment A: Location Maps

Police Department, 701 Civic Center Boulevard

111
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 13 ends

13 Attachment A: Location Maps

Fire Station, 621 Pintail Drive

112
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 14 ends

14 Attachment B: Fire Department Response Time Maps and Stats

113

Response Time Maps and Stats

114
115
116
117
118
Temporary
Fire Station
Option
119

Prepared For Suisun City Fire Department
Project New Fire Station
Location Suisan City CA
Date January 26 2026

PRELIMINARY

PROPOSAL

PREMIUM MANUFACTURED STRUCTURES
120

1 | P a g e

RODUCTION
Chief Lopez
Thank you for the opportunity to provide our recommendations to the Suisun City Fire Department (SCFD) on a modular option for your new station. Our understanding is that the SCFD is in the planning stages for this project that could go ahead in the next 12 - 24 months.

EXTREME Modular Buildings (EMB) is the only company that specializes in the design, manufacture, and installation of modular buildings for the first responder industry. Choosing EMB as your project supplier will streamline the design process, reduce job site related complications, and deliver a customized, operational facility in less than half the time of a site-built project.

EXTREME Modular Buildings is a privately owned Canadian company that can trace its origins back to the late 1990s. Its first official name was One4Haul. In 2015 it changed its name to EXTREME Portable Buildings to reflect more accurately the flagship product. The largest, most durable, most heavy duty, truly portable structure in the industry.

In the late 2010s the company's focus evolved to include a similar factory-built product, which was intended for permanent installations of multiple units that were site connected to create larger complete structures. The unique size and robust nature of the EMB ushered in a new era for modular construction that focused on commercial / municipal facilities instead of the traditional residential and hospitality occupancies. The company’s name was updated once again.

EMB manufactures from a 100,000 sq. ft. facility located in Lethbridge, Canada and installs modular structures throughout Canada and the US, from the arctic to the tropics.

In addition to our recommendations, this preliminary proposal will provide a general outline of the many features available in an EXTREME Modular Building, floor plan examples and a description of how our process works.

INTRODUCTION
121

2 | P a g e

Our initial discussions have revealed the following general requirements for this project:

REQUIREMENTS
122

3 | P a g e

This elevation represents a general architectural style. The actual elevation will reflect the SCFD floor plan and architectural preferences.

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
123

4 | P a g e

The non- combustible, steel framed modules and site framed components will be designed according to North American best practises and all applicable local, state, and national building / energy codes.

Architectural Designs, Engineered Designs, Drawings and Documentation must be supplied to meet the requirements of the local authorities having jurisdiction including Manufactured (Modular) Buildings codes.

Fabricated Structural Components, Interior & Exterior Finishes, Walls, Windows & Doors, HVAC Systems, Wiring, Insulation, Plumbing, Lighting and Appropriate Fixtures to meet or exceed current standards and best practises will be included.

A foundation slab will be required for multi-module configurations. The design and installation of the foundations and module connections to be determined by the site civil engineer.

EMB recommends that SCFD facilitate the site design / development and employ a site contractor to undertake the site preparation and site finishing.

SCFD will employ a Designer of Record to assist with project coordination and to apply for permits.

PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS (1)
124

5 | P a g e

Access to the delivery site for heavy haul transport and lifting equipment is assumed so that modules can be lifted from the trailers and then placed directly in their final position.

Proposed exclusions: (Unless determined otherwise during the design process)
• Cabling of preinstalled conduit for low voltage wiring. • IT / AV equipment, alarm / security systems, exterior lighting and finishing not connected to the building.
• Furniture, appliances, medical equipment, lockers, and other accessories not “built into” the building.
• Site preparation, servicing or finishing, external utility provision and connections, attached exterior architectural enhancements, (Stone, brick, canopies etc.) Sidewalks, decks, fences, paving or landscaping.
• Temporary power during installation if required

PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS (2)
Module Lifting & Transport
125

6 | P a g e

At current raw material costs and manufacturing rates, we estimate the following for the project as proposed:

Design, Manufacturing, Price $ 3-3.5 Million USD
Delivery to Suisun City +
Crane & Installation
Equal to +/-10% of the project price. To
be confirmed when delivery date and
location are determined. Site pre -
staging (if required) will increase this
price.

Design Time Required +/- 3 Months
Production Time Required
(After drawing approval)
+/- 4 Months
Estimate to be reviewed & confirmed during formal design stage .

In response to recently monitored raw material / labor increases EMB has implemented the following escalation policy. If the design is not approved within 6 months of the PO date , prices will escalate by 4%. The same 4% increase will apply for every additional 6-month period until the design is approved . (Trade tariff variability may affect our estimate)

ROM ESTIMATE
126

7 | P a g e

1. Conceptual Design – confirms preliminary design information, preferences, and pricing. ($7500.00 – credited against purchase price) (3-4 weeks)

2. Formal purchase agreement on approval of conceptual design.

3. Formal design – preparation of architectural and engineering documents as required by local, state / provincial, and federal jurisdictions. (3-4 months)

4. Manufacturing (3-4 months)

5. Delivery &Installation. (4- 8 weeks)

Thank you once again for the opportunity to provide SCFD with this proposal.

Team EXTREME looks forward to designing, building, and installing your new station.

Patrick Veer
[email protected]
403-257-8492
www.extrememodularbuildings.com

RANT

CONTACT

NEXT STEPS
127

8 | P a g e

APPARATUS BAYS

KITCHENS

DAYROOM GYM

GALLERY
128
February 25, 2026
Request for Proposals
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Page 15 ends

15 Attachment C: Standard Contract Services Agreement

129
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 1 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

CITY OF SUISUN CITY

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

CONSULTANT ARCHITECT FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT

AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY
STUDY

THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein “Agreement”), is made and entered into this ____ day of __________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF SUISUN CITY, a municipal corporation, (herein “City”) and _______________ (herein “Consultant”). (The term Consultant includes professionals performing in a consulting capacity.) The parties hereto agree as follows:

1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered. 130
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 2 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

1.5 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Contract, Consultant warrants that Consultant (a) has reasonably investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has reasonably considered how the services should be performed, and (c) reasonably understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be reasonably acquainted with the conditions there existing that are within Consultant’s scope of work and would be apparent to any Consultant providing services similar to those provided by Consultant, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.

1.6 Care of Work.

1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No su ch extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, 131
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 3 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation that brings the total cost of the contract to less than $25,000 may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any increases that bring the total cost of the contract to $25,000 or more, taken either separately or cumulatively must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Sect ion shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.9 Special Requirements.

2.0 COMPENSATION

2.1 Contract Sum.

For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of Thirty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Dollars ($34,840.00) (herein “Contract Sum”), except as provided in Section 1.8. The meth od of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion, (ii) payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for repr oduction costs, telephone expense, transportation expense approved by the Contract Officer in advance, and no other expenses and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City; Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.2 Method of Payments.

Unless some other method of payment is specified in the Schedule of Compensation, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first (1st) working day of such month, Consultant shall submit to the City in the form approved by the City’s Director of Finance, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Except as provided in Section 7.3, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than the last working day of the month. 132
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 4 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of th e Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any government al agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreeme nt. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representative of Consultant.

The following principals of Consultant are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
133
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 5 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

Name:

Company:

Address:

City, State Zip:

Phone:

Email:

It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

4.2 Contract Officer.

4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

4.4 Independent Consultant.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or 134
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 6 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

5.0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS

5.1 Insurance.

The Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance:
(a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance . A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis. If the Contract Sum is $25,000.00 or less, the policy of insurance shall be written in an amount not less than either (i) a combined single limit of $500,000.00 or (ii) bodily injury limits of $250,000.00 per person, $500,000.00 per occurrence and $500,000.00 products and completed operations and property damage limits of $100,000.00 per occurrence and $100,000.00 in the aggre gate. If the Contract Sum is greater than $25,000.00 but less than or equal to $100,000.00, the policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than either (i) a combined single limit of $1,000,000.00 for bodily injury, death and property damage or (ii ) bodily injury limits of $500,000.00 per person, $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $1,000,000.00 products and completed operations and property damage limits of $500,000.00 per occurrence and $500,000.00 in the aggregate. If the Contract Sum is greater than $100,000.00, the policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $5,000,000.00 combined single limit.
(b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance . A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both the Consultant and the City against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance . A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than either (i) bodily injury liability limits of $250,000.00 per person and $500,000.00 per occurrence and property damage liability limits of $100,000.00 per occurrence and $250,000.00 in the aggregate or (ii) combined single limit liability of $500,000.00. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non- owned, leased and hired cars.
(d) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, including professional liability insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements. 135
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 7 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

All certificates shall name the City as additional insured (providing the appropriate endorsement) and shall conform to the following “cancellation” notice:

CANCELLATION:

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

5.2 Indemnification.

Consultant agrees to indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, or liabilities, (herein “claims or liabilities”) to the extent arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities of Consultant, its agents, employees, sub Consultants, or invitees, provided for herein, or arisi ng from the negligent acts or omissions of Consultant hereunder, or arising from Consultant’s negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of the City, its officers, agents or employees but excluding such cl aims or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents or employees, who are directly responsible to the City, and in connection therewith:
136
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 8 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

5.3 Performance Bond.

5.4 Sufficiency of Insurer or Surety.

6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS

6.1 Reports.
137
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 9 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

6.2 Records.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

6.4 Release of Documents.

7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT

7.1 California Law.
138
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 10 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

7.2 Disputes.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

7.4 Waiver.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercis e by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.
139
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 11 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

7.6 Legal Action.

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.

If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be grante d, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any 140
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 12 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notice.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer, CITY OF SUISUN CITY, 701 CIVIC CENTER 141
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 13 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

9.2 Interpretation.

9.3 Integration; Amendment.

9.4 Severability.

9.5 Corporate Authority.

142
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 14 of 21 Contract Services Agreement With “Company”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY:

CITY OF SUISUN CITY
a municipal corporation

Bret Prebula, City Manager
ATTEST:

City Clerk – Anita Skinner

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

RICHARDS WATSON GERSHON

City Attorney – Patrick Enright
CONSULTANT:

Company:

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Address:

[END OF SIGNATURES]
143
SSMP & SERP Update Agreem Page 15 of 21 EXHIBIT “A” (Page 1 of 2) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

144
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 16 of 21 EXHIBIT “B” (Page 1 of 1) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Consultant will provide professional liability insurance in the amount of $2 Million.

Waive the performance bond (Section 5.3)

145
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 17 of 21 EXHIBIT “C” (Page 1 of 1) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION

(See next page.)

146
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 18 of 21 EXHIBIT “D” (Page 1 of 1) TO Contract Services Agreement
With Fischer Compliance, LLC

EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE

147
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 19 of 21 EXHIBIT “E” (Page 1 of 3) TO Contract Services Agreement
With “Company”

EXHIBIT “E”

PROVISIONS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE SECTION 1720 ET SEQ.

HOURS OF WORK:

A. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1810, 8 hours of labor in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall constitute a legal day’s work under this contract.

WAGES:

B. In accordance with Labor Code Section 1775, the Consultant and any subconsultants engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall comply Labor Code Section 1775, which establishes a penalty of up to $50 per day for each worker engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A that the Consultant or any subconsultant pays less than the specified prevailing wage. The amount of such penalty shall be determined by the Labor Commissioner and shall be based on consideration of the mistake, inadvertence, or neglect of the Consultant or subconsultant in failing to pay the correct rate of prevailing wages, or the previous record of the 148
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 20 of 21 EXHIBIT “E” (Page 1 of 3) TO Contract Services Agreement
With “Company”

2. The Consultant shall monitor payment of the specified general prevailing rate of per diem wages by the subconsultant by periodic review of the subconsultant’s certified payroll records.

149
SSMP & SERP Update Agreement Page 21 of 21 EXHIBIT “E” (Page 1 of 3) TO Contract Services Agreement
With “Company”

1. The information contained in the payroll record is true and correct.

2. The employer has complied with the requirements of Sections 1771, 1811, and 1815 for any work performed by the employer’s employees on the public works project.

150

SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Option One Option Two Subtotals
Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
16 $3,760.00 4 $940.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Manager 195.00 40 $7,800.00 16 $3,120.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 40 $5,400.00 40 $5,400.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 115.00 16 $1,840.00 8 $920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 112 $18,800.00 68 $10,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $29,180.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,960.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 40 $4,600.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 0 $0.00 60 $8,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,960.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 40 $4,600.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 0 $0.00 60 $8,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,960.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 40 $4,600.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 0 $0.00 60 $8,380.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
24 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 0 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $4,920.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
24 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 24 $4,920.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $4,920.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 136 $28,640.00 248 $35,520.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0. 00 0 $0.00 TOTAL $64,160.00
151
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 SUISUN CITY FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY 71 days Mon 5/18/26 Mon 8/24/26 2 3 TASK 1 - FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY
4 Review Previous Program Studies 2 days Mon 5/18/26 Tue 5/19/26 5 Interview Police Department User Groups 14 days Wed 5/20/26 Mon 6/8/26 6 Interview Fire Department Use Groups 14 days Wed 5/20/26 Mon 6/8/26 7 Compile Data 5 days Tue 6/9/26 Mon 6/15/26
8 Create 50% Study 5 days Tue 6/16/26 Mon 6/22/26
9 Review 50% Study with User Groups 7 days Tue 6/23/26 Wed 7/1/26 10 Incorporate User Feeback, Corrections 14 days Thu 7/2/26 Tue 7/21/26 11 Create 90% Study 5 days Wed 7/22/26 Tue 7/28/26
12 Review 90% Study with User Groups 7 days Wed 7/29/26 Thu 8/6/26 13 Finalize Study 7 days Fri 8/7/26 Mon 8/17/26
14 Create 100% Study 5 days Tue 8/18/26 Mon 8/24/26
15 16 Task 2 - Existing Building Analyses
17 Review Existing As-Built Plans 5 days Wed 5/20/26 Tue 5/26/26 18 Site Investigate Existing Building Systems - Police 7 days Wed 5/27/26 Thu 6/4/26 19 Site Investigate Existing Building Systems - Fire 7 days Fri 6/5/26 Mon 6/15/26 20 Compile Building Information 14 days Tue 6/16/26 Fri 7/3/26 21 Create CAD File 14 days Mon 7/6/26 Thu 7/23/26
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
5/10 5/24 6/7 6/21 7/5 7/19 8/2 8/16
May 17, '26 Jun 7, '26 Jun 28, '26 Jul 19, '26 Aug 9, '26 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Deadline
Progress

Page 1 ends

Project: ROCKLIN FD_GANTT CHA
Date: Tue 4/7/26
152

SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Review Prev Studies Interview PD Interv iew FD Compile Data Create 50% Study Review 50% Study S ubtotals Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
2 $470.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00
Project Manager 195.00 2 $390.00 12 $2,340.00 12 $2,340.00 0 $0.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 16 $2,160.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 8 $1,400.00 12 $2,340.00 12 $2,340.00 16 $2,160.00 16 $2,320.00 4 $860.00 $11,420.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
4 $820.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 4 $820.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 $4,100.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
4 $820.00 0 $0.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 12 $2,460.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 $4,100.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 16 $3,040.00 24 $4,800.00 24 $4,800.00 16 $2,160. 00 24 $3,960.00 4 $860.00 TOTAL $19,620.00
153

SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Incorporate Feedback Create 90% Study R eview 90% Study Finalize Study Create 100% Study Subto tals Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
2 $470.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00 2 $470.00 0 $0.00 Project Manager 195.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 0 $0.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 4 $540.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 4 $540.00 4 $540.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 115.00 0 $0.00 4 $460.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $460.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 8 $1,400.00 12 $1,860.00 4 $860.00 8 $1,400.00 12 $1,860.00 0 $0.00 $7,380.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 $820.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 2 $410.00 0 $0.00 $820.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 8 $1,400.00 16 $2,680.00 4 $860.00 8 $1,400.00 16 $ 2,680.00 0 $0.00 TOTAL $9,020.00
154

SUPPORT FOR SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION FACILITY NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Consultant Rate Review (E) As-Builts Site Investigate PD Site Investigate FD Compile Bldg Info Create CAD fi les Subtotals Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Hours Subtotal Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Principal Architect 235.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $940.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Manager 195.00 4 $780.00 2 $390.00 2 $390.00 4 $780.00 4 $780.00 0 $0.00 Architect/Specification Writer 155.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 135.00 0 $0.00 8 $1,080.00 8 $1,080.00 8 $1,080.00 16 $2,160.00 0 $0.00 \ Clerical 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $460.00 4 $460.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Architecture 4 $780.00 10 $1,470.00 10 $1,470.00 20 $3,260.00 24 $3,400.00 0 $0.00 $10,380.00 Structural Engineering
Principal Structural Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Structural Engineer 185.00 4 $740.00 2 $370.00 2 $370.00 4 $740.00 4 $740.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 16 $1,840.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Structural Engineering 4 $740.00 10 $1,290.00 10 $1,290.00 16 $2,480.00 20 $2,580.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Mechanical Engineering
Principal Mechanical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 4 $740.00 2 $370.00 2 $370.00 4 $740.00 4 $740.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 16 $1,840.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Mechanical 4 $740.00 10 $1,290.00 10 $1,290.00 16 $2,480.00 20 $2,580.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 115
Electrical Engineering
Principal Electrical Engineer 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 4 $820.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 185.00 4 $740.00 2 $370.00 2 $370.00 4 $740.00 4 $740.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 8 $920.00 16 $1,840.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal - Electrical 4 $740.00 10 $1,290.00 10 $1,290.00 16 $2,480.00 20 $2,580.00 0 $0.00 $8,380.00 Bruce Muramoto
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - Bruce Muramoto 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 FDC Consultants
Principal Consultant 205.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Subtotal - FDC Consultants 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 Consultant
Principal Engineer 185.00
0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00
Project Engineer 145.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Technician 115.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Clerical 75.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 Subtotal 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTALS 16 $3,000.00 40 $5,340.00 40 $5,340.00 68 $10,700 .00 84 $11,140.00 0 $0.00 TOTAL $35,520.00
155

REQUEST FOR

PROPOSALS

City of Suisun City

CONSULTANT ARCHITECT
FOR

POLICE DEPARTMENT

AND FIRE STATION

FACILITY NEEDS AND

FEASIBILITY STUDY

April 8, 2026
156
A1. Cover Letter

April 8, 2026

Request for Proposal Review Committee
Suisun City Public Works Department
City of Suisun City
Suisun City, California

Subject : REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
Consultant Architect for Police Department and Fir e Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study

Members of the Review Committee :

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects (CH&D ) is well qualified for the City of Suisun City Facility Needs and Feasibility Study and presents our qualifications herein.

CH&D and Team has no potential conflicts of interest with the City of Suisun City.

CH&D and Team has no lawsuits or litigation resulting from any job undertaken by the firm or by its sub-consultants which is still pending or has occurred on projects within the last five years.

CH&D Acknowledges three Addenda to this RFP. Acknowledgement Forms attached herein.

Sincerely,

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
Dennis Dong, AIA, CSI
157
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
2 A2. Executive Summary
This proposal is for the development of a Facility Needs and Feasibility Study for the Suisun City Police Department and Fire Department.

The reason for the proposal is succinctly expressed in the RFP:

Purpose of the Study:

Importantly, the study would not recommend a single outcome but instead provide the City with options, cost ranges, and risk assessments to support informed policy decisions.

To repeat, this proposal is for a STUDY, to be used as a tool by the City for determining solutions to critical issues facing the Police and Fire Departments.

To accomplish this Study, Calpo Hom & Dong Architects (CH&D) has put together a team of experts and professionals to:

Conduct interviews and discussions with the User Groups to establish the specific needs and requirements – critical and future – of the Study.

158
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
3 A3. Project Team

CH&D will be the Prime Consultant and Leader of the Project Team.

This CH&D Team will be committed to perform the proposed work within the time limits of the project’
This CH&D Team will be responsive to all issues in a timely manner.

This CH&D Team will track team hours worked and will provide invoices in a timely manner.

Project Team Members include the following.

Architecture and Programming :

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects, Sacramento

Principal-In-Charge/Project Manager: Dennis Dong , AIA, CSI [email protected] / 530-305-9129
Involvement with Facilities Need & Feasibility Stu dy and Existing Building Analysis

Law Enforcement Consultant :

Bruce Muramoto, Davis

Bruce Muramoto has worked with Calpo Hom & Dong Ar chitects, and Dennis Dong

Principal-In-Charge : Bruce Muramoto, Police Chie f (ret) Winters [email protected] / 530-681-2867
Involvement with Facilities Need & Feasibility Stu dy

Fire Consultant :

159
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
4 Structural Engineering :

Bevier Structural Engineering, Sacramento

Founded in 1993, and providing Structural Engineering services for commercial, residential, solar, DSA and OSHPD projects through out the Western United States.

Principal-In-Charge: Jeff Kovach, SE

[email protected] / 916-631-3030
Involvement with Existing Building Analysis

Mechanical, Engineering :

Sigma Engineering, Sacramento

Sigma Engineering, and it’s predecessor firm, Ed Rios & Associates, has provided Mechanical Engineering services to Calpo Hom & Dong Architects, and Dennis Dong specifically, for over thirty years.

Mechanical Engineer: John Kaiser, ME

[email protected] / 530-575-2801
Involvement with Existing Building Analysis

Electrical Engineering

Electrical Engineer: Tony Baker

[email protected] / 916-267-3249
Involvement with Existing Building Analysis

References
The CH&D Team appreciates the request for references, and encourages the City to call on and check these references to confirm qualifications.

Ryan Chance, Engineering Manager, City of Folsom
Client, Folsom Fire Stations 34, 39
[email protected] / 916-548-9994

Dave Gamache, Police Chief (ret.), Yreka Police Department Client, Yreka Police Facility Project
[email protected] / 530-340-2375 cell

Eric Alvarez, Fire Chief, Willits Fire Department
Client, Willits Fire Station 54
[email protected] / 707-459-6271
[email protected] / 916-223-7741 cell

160
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
5 Building Analyses Consultants

Facility Needs & Feasibility Study
Consultants

Project Team Organization Chart

Calpo Hom & Dong Architects

Consultants

CH&D Staff

Programming Study
Facilities Assessment

Sigma Engineering
Mechanical Engineers
HVAC and Plumbing Design
Capitol City Design
Electrical Engineers
Electrical Lighting, Power, and
Signal Design
Bevier Structural Engineering
Structural Engineers
Structural Engineering Design
Police Department
and
Fire Department
Dennis Dong, AIA, CSI
Principal-In-Charge
Project Manager
City of
Suisun City
Bruce Muramoto
Police Chief (ret)
Lae Enforcement Consultant
FDC Consultants
Fred Russell, Division Chief (ret)
Fire Consultant
161
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
6 A4. Key Personnel References

• Folsom Fire Station No. 38 Remodel and Addition
• City of Folsom Fire Department
• Contact : Ken Cusano, Fire Chief, 916-461-6313 /
[email protected]
535 Glenn Drive, Folsom, California 95630

162
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
7 • Yreka Police Department New Station Retrofit
• City of Yreka
• Contact : Dave Gamache, Police Chief, 530-841-230 7/
[email protected]
Yreka Police Department, 1400 Fairlane Road, Yre ka, California 96097

• Retrofit of an existing Commercial Building into new facilities for the Yreka Police Department. Existing building (+/-9,000 sf) was constructed in 2009, and used as a commercial lease space.

Wood Frame, Concrete Slab, Wood Roof Truss constr uction.

163
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
8 • Willits Fire Station No. 54
• Little Lake Fire Protection District
• Contact : Eric Alvarez, Fire Chief, 707-354-4039 /
[email protected]
74 E. Commercial Street, Willits, California 9549 0
• Planning and design of new One-Story Fire Station (±11,063 square feet), for a Volunteer Department. Facility includes Apparatu s Bays (5 x 1 vehicles deep), Administrative Offices, Training/ Community Room , Living Quarters with 4-Person Crew accommodations, Exercise Room, Equipment Tur nout Areas, Decontamination Areas. Pre-Engineered Metal Building constructio n.

164
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
9 • Winters Police-Fire Facility
• City of Winters Public Safety Department
• Contact : Bruce Muramoto, Fire Chief (ret.),
530-681-2867 /
[email protected]
702 W Main Street, Winters, California 95694

• Planning and design of new Two-Story Joint Police (+/-10,413 square feet) and Fire (±18,141 square feet) Facility (+/-33,458 square feet total).

Pre-Engineered Metal Building and Wood Frame cons truction.

165
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
10 A5. Project Understanding and Approach

CH&D excels in the two areas pertinent to this project:

CH&D has the experience in specific programming of Public Safety Facilities for City of Winters, City of Roseville, City of Rio Vista, and City of Firebaugh.

166
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
11 Programming is the means with which we create a St affing and Space Needs Analysis. Also referred to as Facility Plan ning, this process is a sequential process which translates organizational , operational, and spatial needs into specific facilities requirement s.

1. Review reports and background information provi ded by the City. Perform an analysis on information that is still valid, that needs to be reanalyzed, or that may need to be di scarded.

Whereas any previous Programming efforts may have been terrific, the key is confirming that these Programming effor ts are still valid.

The resulting Programming should give the project direction The desired result is a “buy-in” to the ideas and direction of the project, from all User Groups

Case History: Roseville
Corporation Yard

During the review of the
previous Programming and
Master Plan efforts, CH&D
noticed some resentment
amongst the supervisors.

When queried, the
supervisors complained they
were not included in the first
go-around, and did not expect
to have their opinions heard.

167
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
12 b. Building Analyses – Task 2
The RFP does include floor plans of the existing Police Facility and Fire Station 47.

SUISUN CITY POLICE FACILITY EXISTING FLOOR PLAN

SUISUN CITY FIRE STATION 47 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN

Only the existing floor plans were provided; the amount of additional plans was not revealed at this time.

168
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
13 The CH&D Team will first review what documents are available, and then, by site observation and documentation, augment those plans to get a better picture of thr existing conditions and restraints. If no additional plans are available, then the CH&D Team will need to increase their site time to include discovery of the existing building elements.

Specifically, this CH&D Team will include the Architect, Structural Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, and Electrical Engineer. The following information will be researched:

 Structural System
 Mechanical System
 Plumbing System
 Electrical System
 Building and Site Accessibility Compliance
 Title-24 Energy Compliance
 Codes Compliance

169
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
14 A6. Detailed Work Plan

FACILITY NEEDS & FEASIBILITY STUDY TEAM (FNFS)
 CH&D ARCHITECTS (CH&D)
 BRUCE MURAMOTO (BM)
 FDC CONSULTANTS (FDC)

EXISTING BUILDING ANALYSES TEAM (EBA)
 CH&D ARCHITECTS CH&D)
 BEVIER STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING (BSE)
 SIGMA ENGINEERING (SIGMA)
 CAPITOL CITY DESIGN (CCD)

170
Suisun City Request for Proposal
Police Department and Fire Station Facility Needs and Feasibility Study Calpo Hom & Dong Architects
15 A7. Schedule

Page 1 ends

Suisun City City CouncilJune 16, 2026

Suisun City City Council
June 16, 2026