Cities Index.
Survey results, June 8 through July 31, 2022

Sunnyvale City Council
August 30, 2022

Document
Survey results, June 8 through July 31, 2022
Meeting
August 30, 2022
Body
Sunnyvale City Council
Pages
315
Original file
5.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Benefits: Cheaper. Less construction disruption. Less disruption afterwards. Maintain level roads, much friendlier for cycling. Improved traffic flow with no rail gates. Safer. Space for a park (or other use). Less train noise.

Note on the city's proposed under-crossings and bikes: flat roads are much better for cycling than the artificial hills created by under-crossings.

Under-crossings also make the car exhaust problem worse by containing it.

Question 8
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 9
• I don’t like either option.

Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.
• Other - See my Mary Ave response. Combine the projects. Put the tracks underground. It's one mile. BART put 1 mile underground in Fremont for $125M. Cheaper! Safer! 9 acres new open space! Quiet! Question 11
• Bicycle
Question 12
• Car
• Transit – Caltrain
• Walking
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles more often
Question 14
Copying my Mary Ave comments. We should combine the problems into one project - put the train in a subway.

Have we looked at separating the tracks instead of the roads? It's one track mile from Sunnyvale Ave to Mary Ave. BART built a one mile, 2 track tunnel "under" Lake Elizabeth for $125M. Looks to me like a train subway would cost less than either proposed project, and solve both crossing problems, and give us a park! With the train underground, the grade level railroad right of way can be repurposed..It is a one mile long corridor 75 feet wide would make a very nice downtown park. With land around here going for $10M/acre, that's a $90M benefit to the community.

I briefly looked at RR grade requirements. SPRR's freight requirement is the strictest, allowing a 1% grade. Looks like rail tunnel heights vary, the tallest I could find is 24 feet. For argument, assume we need to lower the railbed 30 feet to allow for a 24 foot tall tunnel plus 6 feet (guess) for the cover structure. At 1% grade, that would stretch the project 3000 feet on each end, roughly to the N. Fair Oaks Ave overcrossing on the south end, and near the 237 overcrossing on the north end.

I'm not in construction, but 3 existing tracks fit in that 75 foot easement parallel to Hendy Ave, and there's 4 tracks in an 80 foot easement near Wolfe Ave. So maybe both tracks can be lowered at once. If not, the two existing Caltrain/UPRR tracks could be lowered one at a time, using the current easement for 2 tracks plus space to construct one subway track at a time. There's no other at grade road crossings or expensive looking infrastructure. Downtown is the Caltrain "station," a simple concrete platform. Construction would go under the existing Fair Oaks Ave overcrossing. Also at the south end is a short section with 4 existing tracks.If the RR companies need the entire length of the 4 track section, there is space in the rail easement near Bowers Ave where the 4 tracks merge to two. The entire 4 track section could be shifted south during construction.

Benefits: Cheaper. Less construction disruption. Less disruption afterwards. Maintain level roads, much friendlier for cycling. Improved traffic flow with no rail gates. Safer. Space for a park (or other use). Less train noise.

Name not available
July 31, 2022, 1:59 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• I don’t like either option.

Question 3
• This option has less potential private property impacts. • This option has less construction impacts.
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
300 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 300 of 315 ends

• Car
Question 5
• Car
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Susannah Medley
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 1:59 PM
Question 1
• Getting to downtown Mountain View
Question 2
• I don’t like either option.

Question 3
• Other - see comments in the last comments field of the survey Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 7
Neither option is good for cyclists unless safety enhancements are made to these designs. For the Depressed Intersection option, I’d like to see protected intersections and No Turn On Red. For the Jughandle option, there needs to be protected intersections, No Turn On Red, bike/ped ramps from the future Evelyn trail down to Mary Ave, and bike-specific traffic signals for crossings at all intersections. This will make it safer and less stressful for cyclists.

Question 8
• Commuting for school
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This will best reduce noise from vehicle traffic.
• This option has less construction impacts.
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 11
• Bicycle
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• Yes, both of the above
Question 14
No response
Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 2:13 PM
Question 1
• Other - To access Central Expressway West.

Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This option has less potential private property impacts. • This option has less construction impacts.
301 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 301 of 315 ends

• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This option has less potential private property impacts. • This option has less construction impacts.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• I do not travel through this crossing
Question 13
• Yes, both of the above
Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 3:46 PM
Question 1
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 2
• I don’t like either option.

Question 3
• This is the safest option.
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 4
• Transit – Caltrain
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
Neither option is good for cyclists unless safety enhancements are made to these designs. For the Depressed Intersection option, I’d like to see protected intersections and No Turn On Red. For the Jughandle option, there need to be protected intersections, No Turn On Red, bike/ped ramps from the future Evelyn trail down to Mary Ave, and bike-specific traffic signals for crossings at all intersections. This will make it safer and less stressful for cyclists.

Question 8
• Getting to parks, trails, or other recreation spots
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 11
302 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 302 of 315 ends

• Bicycle
Question 12
• Transit – Caltrain
• Walking
Question 13
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 14
Improved bicycle crossing greatly improves this as a commuter route to get to the bayshore, my preferred route to work in San Jose offices.

Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 7:34 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Getting to parks, trails, or other recreation spots
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This will best reduce noise from crossing gate bells and train horns. • This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 11
• Bicycle
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 7:35 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
303 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 303 of 315 ends

• Bicycle
Question 5
• Car
Question 6
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Commuting for work
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 11
• Walking
Question 12
• Bicycle
Question 13
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 14
No response
Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 8:21 PM
Question 1
• Getting to parks, trails, or other recreation spots
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Walking
Question 5
• Car
• Transit – Caltrain
• Bicycle
Question 6
• Yes, both of the above
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This will best reduce noise from vehicle traffic.
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc.

Question 11
• Car
304 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 304 of 315 ends

Question 12
• Transit – Caltrain
• Bicycle
• Walking
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
My main issue with the Pedestrian/Bicycle option is that blocking off Sunnyvale Ave car access would divert traffic to California Ave (cutting over to either Fair Oaks or Mathilda). This stretch of California Ave is already way too busy as it is - it is a residential area with a lot of traffic, with the Central Expressway connection for cars as well as bicycles & pedestrians traveling down Frances to access the Caltrain station.

Between Sunnyvale Ave and Mathilda, there is not a single crosswalk or any method of car traffic control (stop signs, speed tables/humps) and the road is so narrow that there is no bike lane at all, making biking feel unsafe.

The speed limit on Cal Ave is 25 (from Fair Oaks to Sunnyvale Ave to Mathilda to Mary) and people drive MUCH faster on all those stretches. It is already difficult and unsafe to cross California Ave at Frances or to cross any direction at the three-way intersection where San Anselmo connects to Central.

California Ave at least feels safer to walk/bike between Fair Oaks & Sunnyvale and between Mathilda & Mary - the street is much wider, there is an all-way stop at California & Sobrante (the connection to Central Expwy South on the other side of Mathilda), a somewhat decent crosswalk at Northrop Grumman. If the Pedestrian/Bicycle Underpass option is chosen, I would strongly urge the addition of safety measures on California Ave and consideration of the effect that increased traffic through this residential area might have.

Name not available
July 31, 2022, 8:41 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• I don’t like either option.

Question 3
• This option has less potential private property impacts. • This option has less construction impacts.
• Other - It negatively impacts small businesses in the area Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Walking
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 9
• I don’t like either option.

Question 10
• This option has less potential private property impacts.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• Walking
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
305 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 305 of 315 ends

July 31, 2022, 8:45 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles more often
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 11
• I do not travel through this crossing
Question 12
• I do not travel through this crossing
Question 13
• Yes, because I would feel safer without the train tracks Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 9:15 PM
Question 1
• Getting to downtown Mountain View
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Walking
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Getting to downtown Sunnyvale
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
306 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 306 of 315 ends

• This is the safest option.
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 9:27 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc. • This option has less potential private property impacts. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Car
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Getting to downtown Sunnyvale
Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
Question 10
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 9:34 PM
Question 1
• Commuting for work
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
307 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 307 of 315 ends

• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc. • This option has less potential private property impacts. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Commuting for work
Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
Question 10
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc.

Question 11
No response
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 9:49 PM
Question 1
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary and Evelyn intersection
Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Car
Question 6
• Yes, both of the above
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Commuting for work
Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This will best reduce noise from crossing gate bells and train horns. • This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
308 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 308 of 315 ends

• Yes, both of the above
Question 14
No response
Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 10:11 PM
Question 1
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• Other - Keeps Evelyn level for easier cycling
Question 4
• Bicycle
Question 5
• Car
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
My "sky's the limit" preference would be to leave the streets alone and instead elevate Caltrain.

Question 8
• Commuting for work
Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
Question 10
• Other - The bike lanes along Sunnyvale Ave. would be a roughly straight line, giving this option better retention of bicycle momentum & making for an easier traversal.

Question 11
• Bicycle
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
My "sky's the limit" preference would be to leave the streets alone and instead elevate Caltrain.

Realistically, I might instead cycle through the level crossing at the Caltrain station rather than add a third grade-separated crossing (i.e., in addition to the two freeway crossings aligned with Borregas Ave.) to my bicycle commute.

Name not available
July 31, 2022, 10:18 PM
Question 1
• Commuting for work
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • Other - Minimize impact to Evelyn
Question 4
• Bicycle
Question 5
• Transit – Caltrain
309 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 309 of 315 ends

Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Commuting for work
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This will best reduce noise from vehicle traffic.
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 11
• Bicycle
Question 12
• Transit – Caltrain
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
James Guan
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 10:18 PM
Question 1
• Commuting for work
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This option has less potential private property impacts. • This option has less construction impacts.
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Car
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Getting to downtown Sunnyvale
Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This will best reduce noise from crossing gate bells and train horns. • This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
310 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 310 of 315 ends

Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 10:31 PM
Question 1
• Getting to downtown Mountain View
Question 2
• I like both options equally.

Question 3
• Other - I don't know.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• I do not travel through this crossing
Question 6
• Yes, both of the above
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• I do not travel through this crossing
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 11:29 PM
Question 1
• Commuting for work
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This is the safest option.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• Yes, because I would feel safer without the train tracks Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Commuting for work
Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
311 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 311 of 315 ends

Question 10
• This is the safest option.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• Bicycle
Question 13
• Yes, because I would feel safer without the train tracks Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 11:32 PM
Question 1
• Getting to downtown Mountain View
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• I do not travel through this crossing
Question 6
• Yes, both of the above
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Getting to parks, trails, or other recreation spots
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 11
• Walking
Question 12
• Walking
Question 13
• Yes, because I would feel safer without the train tracks Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 11:46 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This is the safest option.
• This option has less construction impacts.
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
312 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 312 of 315 ends

• Car
Question 5
• Transit – Caltrain
Question 6
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Getting to downtown Sunnyvale
Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This will best reduce noise from crossing gate bells and train horns. • This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This has better circulation patterns for pedestrians.

Question 11
• Walking
Question 12
• Car
Question 13
• Yes, both of the above
Question 14
No response
Name not shown
inside Sunnyvale
July 31, 2022, 11:55 PM
Question 1
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 2
• I like both options equally.

Question 3
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Bicycle
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
Please build a safe and cost effective solution.

I am skeptical about mixing bike and car traffic on arterial roads with the existing designs (citywide). Some real separation is required to improve confidence and make the bike lanes safe for families.

It seems like the 7/11 and gas station are doomed with any meaningful changes.

Question 8
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 9
• Bicycle and Pedestrian only Underpass of Sunnyvale – No cars Question 10
• This is the safest option.
• This has better circulation patterns for bicyclists, scooters, etc. • This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 11
• Bicycle
313 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 313 of 315 ends

Question 12
• Car
• Walking
Question 13
• Yes, both of the above
Question 14
No response
Name not available
July 31, 2022, 11:58 PM
Question 1
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary and Evelyn intersection
Question 3
• This will best reduce noise from crossing gate bells and train horns. • This will best reduce noise from vehicle traffic.
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc.

Question 4
• Car
Question 5
• Car
Question 6
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 9
• Underpass Tunnel of Sunnyvale Avenue underneath Evelyn Ave, Caltrain tracks, and Hendy Ave
Question 10
• This will best reduce noise from crossing gate bells and train horns. • This will best reduce noise from vehicle traffic.
• This has better circulation patterns for cars, buses, etc.

Question 11
• Car
Question 12
• Car
• Walking
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
Anna Lau
inside Sunnyvale
August 1, 2022, 12:00 AM
Question 1
• I do not or rarely travel through here
Question 2
• Underpass of Mary Avenue with “jug handle” connection to Evelyn Avenue
Question 3
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 4
• Bicycle
Question 5
314 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 314 of 315 ends

• Car
Question 6
• Yes, because the project is adding bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Question 7
No response
Question 8
• Accessing businesses and amenities close to this location Question 9
• I don’t like either option.

Question 10
• This option has a lower construction cost estimate.

Question 11
• Bicycle
Question 12
• Car
• Walking
Question 13
• No, I would use vehicles the same amount
Question 14
No response
315 | www.opentownhall.com/11919 Created with OpenGov | August 9, 2022, 11:42 AM Caltrain crossing options at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues How should we change the Caltrain crossings at Mary and Sunnyvale avenues? Attachment 5

Page 315 of 315 ends
← All documents from this meeting