STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 6
o Discoloration of receiving water, and
o Impact to the receiving water.
2.3.2. Receiving Water – Water Quality Sampling and Analysis For sewage spills in which an estimated 50,000 gallons or greater are discharged into a surface water, the Enrollee shall conduct the following water quality sampling no later than 18 hours after the Enrollee’s knowledge of a potential discharge to a surface water:
• Collect one water sample, each day of the duration of the spill, at:
o The DCS-001 location as described in section 2.3.4 (Receiving Water Sampling Locations) of this Attachment, if sewage discharges to a surface water via a drainage conveyance system; and/or
o Each of the three receiving water sampling locations in section 2.3.4 (Receiving Water Sampling Locations) of this Attachment;
If the receiving water has no flow during the duration of the spill, the Enrollee must report “No Sampling Due To No Flow” for its receiving water sampling locations.
The Enrollee shall analyze the collected receiving water samples for the following constituents per section 2.3.3 (Water Quality Analysis Specifications) of this Attachment:
• Ammonia, and
• Appropriate bacterial indicator(s) per the applicable Basin Plan water quality objectives, including one or more of the following, unless directed otherwise by the Regional Water Board:
o Total Coliform Bacteria
o Fecal Coliform Bacteria
o E-coli
o Enterococcus
Dependent on the receiving water(s), sampling of bacterial indicators shall be sufficient to determine post-spill (after the spill) compliance with the water quality objectives and bacterial standards of the California Ocean Plan or the California Inland Surface Water Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan, including the frequency and/or number of post-spill receiving water samples as may be specified in the applicable plans.
The Enrollee shall collect and analyze additional samples as required by the applicable Regional Water Board Executive Officer or designee.
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 7
2.3.3. Water Quality Analysis Specifications
Spill monitoring must be representative of the monitored activity (40 Code of Federal Regulations section 122.41(j)(1)).
Sufficiently Sensitive Methods
Sample analysis must be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test methods approved under 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 136 for the sample analysis of pollutants. For the purposes of this General Order, a method is sufficiently sensitive when the minimum level of the analytical method approved under 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 136 is at or below the receiving water pollutant criteria.
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program-Accredited Laboratories The analysis of water quality samples required per this General Order must be performed by a laboratory that has accreditation pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with section 100825) of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 101 of the Health and Safety Code. (Water Code section 13176(a).) The State Water Board accredits laboratories through its Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP).
2.3.4. Receiving Water Sampling Locations
The Enrollee shall collect receiving water samples at the following locations.
Sampling of Flow in Drainage Conveyance System (DCS) Prior to Discharge Sampling
Location Sampling Location Description
DCS-001 A point in a drainage conveyance system before the drainage conveyance system flow discharges into a receiving water.
Receiving Surface Water Sampling (RSW)1
Sampling
Location Sampling Location Description
RSW-001
Point of Discharge
A point in the receiving water where sewage initially enters the receiving water.
RSW-001U:
Upstream of Point
of Discharge
A point in the receiving water, upstream of the point of sewage discharge, to capture ambient conditions absent of sewage discharge impacts.
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 8
Sampling
Location Sampling Location Description
RSW-001D:
Downstream of
Point of Discharge
A point in the receiving water, downstream of the point of sewage discharge, where the spill material is fully mixed with the receiving water.
1 The Enrollee must use its best professional judgment to determine the upstream and downstream distances based on receiving water flow, accessibility to upstream/downstream waterbody banks, and size of visible sewage plume.
2.4. Safety and Access Exceptions
If the Enrollee encounters access restrictions or unsafe conditions that prevents its compliance with spill response requirements or monitoring requirements in this General Order, the Enrollee shall provide documentation of access restrictions and/or safety hazards in the corresponding required report.
3. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
All reporting required in this General Order must be submitted electronically to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database (https://ciwqs.waterboards.ca.gov), unless specified otherwise in this General Order. Electronic reporting may solely be conducted by a Legally Responsible Official or Data Submitter(s) previously designated by the Legally Responsible Official, as required in section 5.8 (Designation of Data Submitters) of this General Order.
The Enrollee shall report any information that is protected by the Homeland Security Act, by email to [email protected], with a brief explanation of the protection provided by the Homeland Security Act for the subject report to be protected from unauthorized disclosure and/or public access, and for official Water Board regulatory purposes only.
3.1. Reporting Requirements for Individual Category 1 Spill Reporting
3.1.1. Draft Spill Report for Category 1 Spills
Within three (3) business days of the Enrollee’s knowledge of a Category 1 spill, the Enrollee shall submit a Draft Spill Report to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database.
The Draft Spill Report must, at minimum, include the following items:
1. Contact information: Name and telephone number of Enrollee contact person to respond to spill-specific questions;
2. Spill location name;
3. Date and time the Enrollee was notified of, or self-discovered, the spill;
4. Operator arrival time;
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 9
5. Estimated spill start date and time;
6. Date and time the Enrollee notified the California Office of Emergency Services, and the assigned control number;
7. Description, photographs, and GPS coordinates of the system location where the spill originated;
o If a single spill event results in multiple appearance points, provide GPS coordinates for the appearance point closest to the failure point and describe each additional appearance point in the spill appearance point explanation field;
8. Estimated total spill volume exiting the system;
9. Description and photographs of the extent of the spill and spill boundaries;
10. Did the spill reach a drainage conveyance system? If Yes:
o Description of the drainage conveyance system transporting the spill; o Photographs of the drainage conveyance system entry location(s); o Estimated spill volume fully recovered from the drainage conveyance system; o Estimated spill volume remaining within the drainage conveyance system;
11. Description and photographs of all discharge point(s) into the surface water;
12. Estimated spill volume that discharged to surface waters; and
13. Estimated total spill volume recovered.
3.1.2. Certified Spill Report for Category 1 Spills
Within 15 calendar days of the spill end date, the Enrollee shall submit a Certified Spill Report for Category 1 spills, to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database.
Upon completion of the Certified Spill Report, the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database will issue a final spill event identification number.
The Certified Spill Report must, at minimum, include the following mandatory information in addition to all information in the Draft Spill Report per section 3.1.1 (Draft Spill Report for Category 1 Spills) above:
1. Description of the spill event destination(s), including GPS coordinates if available, that represent the full spread and reach of the spill;
2. Spill end date and time;
3. Description of how the spill volume estimations were calculated, including at a minimum:
o The methodology, assumptions and type of data relied upon, such as supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) records, flow monitoring or other telemetry information used to estimate the volume of the spill discharged, and the volume of the spill recovered (if any volume of the spill was recovered), and o The methodology(ies), assumptions and type of data relied upon for estimations of the spill start time and the spill end time;
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 10
4. Spill cause(s) (for example, root intrusion, grease deposition, etc.);
5. System failure location (for example, main, lateral, pump station, etc.);
6. Description of the pipe material, and estimated age of the pipe material, at the failure location;
7. Description of the impact of the spill;
8. Whether or not the spill was associated with a storm event;
9. Description of spill response activities including description of immediate spill containment and cleanup efforts;
10. Description of spill corrective action, including steps planned or taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the spill, and a schedule of major milestones for those steps;
11. Spill response completion date;
12. Detailed narrative of investigation and investigation findings of cause of spill;
13. Reasons for an ongoing investigation (as applicable) and the expected date of completion;
14. Name and type of receiving water body(s);
15. Description of the water body(s), including but not limited to:
o Observed impacts on aquatic life,
o Public closure, restricted public access, temporary restricted use, and/or posted health warnings due to spill,
o Responsible entity for closing/restricting use of water body, and o Number of days closed/restricted as a result of the spill.
16. Whether or not the spill was located within 1,000 feet of a municipal surface water intake; and
17. If water quality samples were collected, identify sample locations and the parameters the water quality samples were analyzed for. If no samples were taken, Not Applicable shall be selected.
3.1.3. Spill Technical Report for Individual Category 1 Spill in which 50,000 Gallons or Greater Discharged into a Surface Water
For any spill in which 50,000 gallons or greater discharged into a surface water, within 45 calendar days of the spill end date, the Enrollee shall submit a Spill Technical Report to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database. The Spill Technical Report, at minimum, must include the following information:
1. Spill causes and circumstances, including at minimum:
o Complete and detailed explanation of how and when the spill was discovered; Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 11
o Photographs illustrating the spill origin, the extent and reach of the spill, drainage conveyance system entrance and exit, receiving water, and post-cleanup site conditions;
o Diagram showing the spill failure point, appearance point(s), the spill flow path, and ultimate destinations;
o Detailed description of the methodology employed, and available data used to calculate the discharge volume and, if applicable, the recovered spill volume; o Detailed description of the spill cause(s);
o Description of the pipe material, and estimated age of the pipe material, at the failure location;
o Description of the impact of the spill;
o Copy of original field crew records used to document the spill; and o Historical maintenance records for the failure location.
2. Enrollee’s response to the spill:
o Chronological narrative description of all actions taken by the Enrollee to terminate the spill;
o Explanation of how the Sewer System Management Plan Spill Emergency Response Plan was implemented to respond to and mitigate the spill; and o Final corrective action(s) completed and a schedule for planned corrective actions, including:
▪ Local regulatory enforcement action taken against an illicit discharge in response to this spill, as applicable,
▪ Identifiable system modifications, and operation and maintenance program modifications needed to prevent repeated spill occurrences, and ▪ Necessary modifications to the Emergency Spill Response Plan to incorporate lessons learned in responding to and mitigating the spill.
3. Water Quality Monitoring, including at minimum:
o Description of all water quality sampling activities conducted; o List of pollutant and parameters monitored, sampled and analyzed; as required in section 2.3 (Receiving Water Monitoring) of this Attachment; o Laboratory results, including laboratory reports;
o Detailed location map illustrating all water quality sampling points; and o Other regulatory agencies receiving sample results (if applicable).
4. Evaluation of spill impact(s), including a description of short-term and long-term impact(s) to beneficial uses of the surface water.
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 12
3.1.4. Amended Certified Spill Reports for Individual Category 1 Spills The Enrollee shall update or add additional information to a Certified Spill Report within 90 calendar days of the spill end date by amending the report or by adding an attachment to the Spill Report in the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database.
The Enrollee shall certify the amended report.
After 90 calendar days, the Enrollee shall contact the State Water Board at [email protected] to request to amend a Spill Report. The Legally Responsible Official shall submit justification for why the additional information was not reported within the Amended Spill Report due date.
3.2. Reporting Requirements for Individual Category 2 Spill Reporting
3.2.1. Draft Spill Report for Category 2 Spills
Within three (3) business days of the Enrollee’s knowledge of a Category 2 spill, the Enrollee shall submit a Draft Spill Report to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database.
The Draft Spill Report must, at minimum, include the following items:
1. Contact information: Name and telephone number of Enrollee contact person to respond to spill-specific questions;
2. Spill location name;
3. Date and time the Enrollee was notified of, or self-discovered, the spill;
4. Operator arrival time;
5. Estimated spill start date and time;
6. Date and time the Enrollee notified the California Office of Emergency Services, and the assigned control number;
7. Description, photographs, and GPS coordinates of the system location where the spill originated;
If a single spill event results in multiple appearance points, provide GPS coordinates for the appearance point closest to the failure point and describe each additional appearance point in the spill appearance point explanation field;
8. Estimated total spill volume exiting the system;
9. Description and photographs of the extent of the spill and spill boundaries;
10. Did the spill reach a drainage conveyance system? If Yes:
o Description of the drainage conveyance system transporting the spill; o Photographs of the drainage conveyance system entry location(s); o Estimated spill volume fully recovered from the drainage conveyance system; o Estimated spill volume remaining within the drainage conveyance system; Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 13
o Estimated spill volume discharged to a groundwater infiltration basin or facility, if applicable; and
11. Estimated total spill volume recovered.
3.2.2. Certified Spill Report for Category 2 Spills
Within 15 calendar days of the spill end date, the Enrollee shall submit a Certified Spill Report for the Category 2 spill, to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database (https://ciwqs.waterboards.ca.gov). Upon completion of the Certified Spill Report, the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database will issue a final spill event identification number.
The Certified Spill Report must, at minimum, include the following mandatory information in addition to all information in the Draft Spill Report per section 3.2.1 (Draft Spill Report for Category 2 Spills) above:
1. Description of the spill event destination(s), including GPS coordinates if available, that represent the full spread and reach of the spill;
2. Spill end date and time;
3. Description of how the spill volume estimations were calculated, including at a minimum:
o The methodology, assumptions and type of data relied upon, such as supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) records, flow monitoring or other telemetry information used to estimate the volume of the spill discharged, and the volume of the spill recovered (if any volume of the spill was recovered), and o The methodology(ies), assumptions and type of data relied upon for estimations of the spill start time and the spill end time;
4. Spill cause(s) (for example, root intrusion, grease deposition, etc.);
5. System failure location (for example, main, pump station, etc.);
6. Description of the pipe/infrastructure material, and estimated age of the pipe material, at the failure location;
7. Description of the impact of the spill;
8. Whether or not the spill was associated with a storm event;
9. Description of spill response activities including description of immediate spill containment and cleanup efforts;
10. Description of spill corrective action, including steps planned or taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the spill, and a schedule of major milestones for those steps;
11. Spill response completion date;
12. Detailed narrative of investigation and investigation findings of cause of spill;
13. Reasons for an ongoing investigation (as applicable) and the expected date of completion; and
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 14
14. Whether or not the spill was located within 1,000 feet of a municipal surface water intake.
3.2.3. Amended Certified Spill Reports for Individual Category 2 Spills The Enrollee shall update or add additional information to a Certified Spill Report within 90 calendar days of the spill end date by amending the report or by adding an attachment to the Spill Report in the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database.
The Enrollee shall certify the amended report.
After 90 calendar days, the Enrollee shall contact the State Water Board at [email protected] to request to amend a Spill Report. The Legally Responsible Official shall submit justification for why the additional information was not reported within the Amended Spill Report due date.
3.3. Monthly Certified Spill Reporting for Category 3 Spills The Enrollee shall report and certify all Category 3 spills to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database within 30 calendar days after the end of the month in which the spills occurred. (For example, all Category 3 spills occurring in the month of February shall be reported and certified by March 30th). After the Legally Responsible Official certifies the spills, the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database will issue a spill event identification number for each spill.
The monthly reporting of all Category 3 spills must include the following items for each spill:
1. Contact information: Name and telephone number of Enrollee contact person to respond to spill-specific questions;
2. Spill location name;
3. Date and time the Enrollee was notified of, or self-discovered, the spill;
4. Operator arrival time;
5. Estimated spill start date and time;
6. Description, photographs, and GPS coordinates where the spill originated:
o If a single spill event results in multiple appearance points, provide GPS coordinates for the appearance point closest to the failure point and describe each additional appearance point in the spill appearance point explanation field;
7. Estimated total spill volume exiting the system;
8. Description and photographs of the extent of the spill and spill boundaries;
9. Did the spill reach a drainage conveyance system? If Yes:
o Description of the drainage conveyance system transporting the spill; o Photographs of the drainage conveyance system entry locations(s); o Estimated spill volume fully recovered from the drainage conveyance system; and Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 15
o Estimated spill volume discharged to a groundwater infiltration basis or facility, if applicable.
10. Estimated total spill volume recovered;
11. Description of the spill event destination(s), including GPS coordinates, if available, that represent the full spread and reaches of the spill;
12. Spill end date and time;
13. Description of how the spill volume estimations were calculated, including, at minimum:
o The methodology and type of data relied upon, including supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) records, flow monitoring or other telemetry information used to estimate the volume of the spill discharged, and the volume of the spill recovered (if any volume of the spill was recovered), and o The methodology and type of data relied upon to estimate the spill start time, on-going spill rate at time of arrival (if applicable), and the spill end time;
14. Spill cause(s) (for example, root intrusion, grease deposition, etc.);
15. System failure location (for example, main, pump station, etc.);
16. Description of the pipe/infrastructure material, and estimated age of the pipe/infrastructure material, at the failure location;
17. Description of the impact of the spill;
18. Whether or not the spill was associated with a storm event;
19. Description of spill response activities including description of immediate spill containment and cleanup efforts;
20. Description of spill corrective actions, including steps planned or taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the spill, and a schedule of the major milestones for those steps; including, at minimum:
o Local regulatory enforcement action taken against an illicit discharge in response to this spill, as applicable, and
o Identifiable system modifications, and operation and maintenance program modifications needed to prevent repeated spill occurrences at the same spill event location, including:
▪ Adjusted schedule/method of preventive maintenance,
▪ Planned rehabilitation or replacement of sanitary sewer asset, ▪ Inspected, repaired asset(s), or replaced defective asset(s), ▪ Capital improvements,
▪ Documentation verifying immediately implemented system modifications and operating/maintenance modifications,
▪ Description of spill response activities,
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 16
▪ Spill response completion date, and
▪ Ongoing investigation efforts, and expected completion date of investigation to determine the full cause of spill;
21. Detailed narrative of investigation and investigation findings of cause of spill.
3.4. Monthly Certified Spill Reporting for Category 4 Spills The Enrollee shall report and certify the estimated total spill volume exiting the sanitary sewer system, and the total number of all Category 4 spills to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database, within 30 calendar days after the end of the month in which the spills occurred.
3.5. Amended Certified Spill Reports for Category 3 Spills Within 90 calendar days of the certified Spill Report due date, the Enrollee may update or add additional information to a certified Spill Report by amending the report or by adding an attachment to the Spill Report in the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database. The Enrollee shall certify the amended report.
After 90 calendar days, the Legally Responsible Official shall contact the State Water Board at [email protected] to request to amend a certified Spill Report. The Legally Responsible Official shall submit justification for why the additional information was not reported within the 90-day timeframe for amending the certified Spill Report, as provided above.
3.6. Annual Certified Spill Reporting of Category 4 and/or Lateral Spills For all Category 4 spills and spills from its owned and/or operated laterals that are caused by a failure or blockage in the lateral and that do not discharge to a surface water, the Enrollee shall:
• Maintain records per section 4.4. of this Attachment; The Enrollee shall provide records upon request by State Water Board or Regional Water Board staff.
• Annually upload and certify a report, in an appropriate digital format, of all recordkeeping of spills to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database, by February 1st after the end of the calendar year in which the spills occurred.
A spill from an Enrollee-owned and/or operated lateral that discharges to a surface water is a Category 1 spill; the Enrollee shall report all Category 1 spills per section 3.1 of Attachment E1 (Notification, Monitoring, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements) of this General Order.
3.7. Monthly Certification of “No-Spills” or “Category 4 Spills” and/or “Non-Category 1 Lateral Spills”
If either (1) no spills occur during a calendar month or (2) only Category 4, and/or Enrollee-owned and/or operated lateral spills (that do not discharge to a surface water) occur during a calendar month, the Enrollee shall certify, within 30 calendar days after Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 17
the end of each calendar month, either a “No-Spill” certification statement, or a “Category 4 Spills” and/or “Non-Category 1 Lateral Spills” certification statement, in the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database, certifying that there were either no spills, or Category 4 and/or Non-Category 1 Lateral Spills that will be reported annually (per section 3.6 of this Attachment) for the designated month.
If a spill starts in one calendar month and ends in a subsequent calendar month, and the Enrollee has no further spills of any category, in the subsequent calendar month, the Enrollee shall certify “no-spills” for the subsequent calendar month.
If the Enrollee has no spills from its systems during a calendar month, but the Enrollee voluntarily reported a spill from a private lateral or a private system, the Enrollee shall certify “no-spills” for that calendar month.
If the Enrollees has spills from its owned and/or operated laterals during a calendar month, the Enrollee shall not certify “no spills” for that calendar month.
3.8. Electronic Sanitary Sewer System Service Area Boundary Map The Legally Responsible Official shall submit, to the State Water Board, an up-to-date electronic spatial map of its sewer system service area boundaries. The map must be in accordance with section 5.14 (Electronic Sanitary Sewer System Service Area Boundary Map) of this General Order and the specification provided on the statewide Sanitary Sewer Systems program website. The map must include the location of wastewater treatment facility(ies) that treats the sewer system waste, if in the same sewer service boundary.
By the Effective Date of this General Order, specifications for the electronic sanitary sewer service area boundary map format will be provided on the statewide Sanitary Sewer Systems Order program website.
3.9. Annual Report (Previously termed as Collection System Questionnaire in General Order 2006-0003-DWQ)
A new Enrollee shall complete and submit its first certified Annual Report into the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database, within 30 days of obtaining a CIWQS account; Subsequent Annual Reports are due by April 1 of each year.
All enrollees shall update their previous year’s Annual Report, by April 1 of each year after the Effective Date of this General Order, for each calendar year (January 1 through December 31).
The Annual Report must be entered directly into the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database. The Enrollee’s Legally Responsible Official shall certify the Annual Report as instructed in CIWQS;
The Annual Report must address, and update as applicable, the following items:
• Population served;
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 18
• Updated sewer system service area boundary map, if service area boundary has changed from original map submitted per section 5.14 (Electronic Sanitary Sewer System Service Area Boundary Map) of this General Order; • Number of system operation and maintenance staff:
o Entry level (less than two years of experience),
o Journey level (greater than two years of experience), o Supervisory level, and
o Managerial level;
• Number of operation and maintenance staff certified as a certified collection system operator by the California Water Environmental Association (CWEA), with:
o Corresponding number of certified collection system operator grade levels (Grade I, II, III, IV, and V);
• System information:
o Miles of system gravity and force mains,
o Number of upper and lower service laterals connected to system, o Estimated number of upper and lower laterals owned and/or operated by the Enrollee,
o Portion of laterals that is Enrollee’s responsibility, o Average age the major components of system infrastructure, o Number and age of pump stations, and
o Estimated total miles of the system pipeline not accessible for maintenance; • Name and location of the treatment plant(s) receiving sanitary sewer system’s waste;
• Name of satellite sewer system tributaries;
• Number of system’s gravity sewer above or underground crossings of water bodies throughout system;
• Number of force main (pressurized pipe) above or underground crossings of water bodies throughout system;
• Number of siphons used to convey waste throughout the sewer system; • Miles of sewer system cleaned;
• Miles of sewer system video inspected, or comparable (i.e., video closed-circuit television or alternative inspection methods);
• System Performance Evaluation as specified in section 5.11 (System Performance Analysis) of this General Order;
• Major spill causes (for example, root intrusion, grease deposition); Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 19
• System infrastructure failure points (for example, main, pump station, lateral, etc.); • Ongoing spill investigations; and
• Actions taken to address system deficiencies.
3.10. Sewer System Management Plan Audit Reporting Requirements The Enrollee shall submit its Sewer System Management Plan Audit and other pertinent audit information, in accordance with section 5.4 (Sewer System Management Plan Audits) of this General Order, to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database by six (6) months after the end of the 3-year audit period.
If a Sewer System Management Plan Audit is not conducted as required: the Enrollee shall:
• Update the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database and select the justification for not conducting the Audit; and
• Notify its corresponding Regional Water Board (see Attachment F (Regional Water Quality Control Board Contact Information)) of the justification for the lapsed requirements.
The Enrollee’s reporting of a justification for not conducting a timely Audit does not justify non-compliance with this General Order. The Enrollee shall:
• Submit the late Audit as required in this General Order; and • Comply with subsequent Audit requirements and due dates corresponding with the original audit cycle.
3.11. Sewer System Management Plan Reporting Requirements For an Existing Enrollee previously regulated by Order 2006-0003-DWQ: Within every six (6) years after the required due date of its last Plan Update, the Legally Responsible Official shall upload and certify a local governing entity-approved Sewer System Management Plan Update to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database. If the electronic document format or size capacity prevents the electronic upload of the Plan, the Legally Responsible Official shall report an electronic link to its updated Sewer System Management Plan posted on its own website.
Order 2006-0003-DWQ required each enrollee to develop its initial Sewer System Management Plan per the following schedule, with required Plan updates at a frequency of 5-years thereafter:
Systems serving populations: Greater than 100,000: May 2, 2009 Between 100,000 and 10,000: August 2, 2009
Between 10,000 and 2,500: May 2, 2010
Less than 2,500: August 2, 2010
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 20
This Order carries forth the previously-required Plan Update schedule per Order 2006-0003-DWQ. Per the six-year Plan Update frequency required in this Order, the Enrollee shall upload and certify its first Plan Update, to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database by the following due dates, with subsequent Plan Updates at the frequency of six years thereafter:
Systems serving populations: Greater than 100,000: May 2, 2025 Between 100,000 and 10,000: August 2, 2025
Between 10,000 and 2,500: May 2, 2026
Less than 2,500: August 2, 2026
For a New Enrollee: Within twelve (12) months of its Application for Enrollment Approval date, the Legally Responsible Official of a new Enrollee shall upload and certify a local governing entity-approved Sewer System Management Plan to the online CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database. If electronic document format or size capacity prevents the electronic upload of the Plan, the Legally Responsible Official shall report an electronic link to its Sewer System Management Plan posted on its own website. The due date for subsequent 6-year Plan updates, is six (6) years from the submittal due date of the new Enrollee’s first Sewer System Management Plan.
4. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS
The Enrollee shall maintain records to document compliance with the provisions of this General Order, and previous General Order 2006-0003-DWQ as applicable, for each sanitary sewer system owned, including any required records generated by an Enrollee’s contractor(s).
4.1. Recordkeeping Time Period
The Enrollee shall maintain records of documents required in this Attachment, including records collected for compliance with this General Order, and records collected in accordance with previous General Order 2006-0003-DWQ, for five (5) years.
4.2. Availability of Documents
The Enrollee shall make the records required in this General Order readily available, either electronic or hard copies, for review by Water Board staff during onsite inspections or through an information request.
4.3. Spill Reports
The Enrollee shall maintain records for each of the following spill-related events and activities:
• Spill event complaint, including but not limited to records documenting how the Enrollee responded to notifications of spills. Each complaint record must, at a minimum, include the following information:
o Date, time, and method of notification,
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 21
o Date and time the complainant first noticed the spill, if available, o Narrative description of the complaint, including any information the caller provided regarding whether the spill has reached surface waters or a drainage conveyance system, if available,
o Complainant’s contact information, if available, and
o Final resolution of the complaint;
• Records documenting the steps and/or remedial action(s) undertaken by the Enrollee, using all available information, to comply with this General Order, and previous General Order 2006-0003-DWQ as applicable;
• Records documenting how estimate(s) of volume(s) and, if applicable, volume(s) of spill recovered were calculated;
• All California Office of Emergency Services notification records, as applicable; and • Records, in accordance with the Monitoring Requirements in this Attachment.
4.4. Recordkeeping of Category 4 Spills and Non-Category 1 Lateral Spills An Enrollee must maintain the following records for each individual Category 4 spill and for each individual non-Category 1 Enrollee-owned and/or operated lateral spill, and report in accordance to section 3.6 (Annual Certified Spill Reporting of Category 4 and/or Lateral Spills) of this Attachment.
Recordkeeping of Individual Category 4 Spill Information:
1. Contact information: Name and telephone number of Enrollee contact person to respond to spill-specific questions;
2. Spill location name;
3. Description and GPS coordinates for the system location where the spill originated;
4. Did the spill reach a drainage conveyance system? If Yes:
o Description of drainage conveyance system location,
o Estimated spill volume fully recovered within the drainage conveyance system, and
o Estimated spill volume remaining within the drainage conveyance system;
5. Estimated total spill volume exiting the sanitary sewer system;
6. Spill date and start time;
7. Spill cause(s) (for example, root intrusion, grease deposition, etc.);
8. System failure location (for example, main, pump station, etc.);
9. Description of spill response activities including description of immediate spill containment and cleanup efforts;
10. Description of how the volume estimation was calculated, including, at minimum:
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 22
o The methodology and type of data relied upon, including supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) records, flow monitoring or other telemetry information used to estimate the volume of the spill discharged, and the volume of the spill recovered (if any volume of the spill was recovered), and o The methodology and type of data relied upon to estimate the spill start time, on- going spill rate at time of arrival (if applicable), and the spill end time;
11. Description of implemented system modifications and operating/maintenance modifications.
Recordkeeping of Individual Lateral Spill Information:
1. Date and time the Enrollee was notified of, or self-discovered, the spill;
2. Location of individual spill;
3. Estimated individual spill volume;
4. Spill cause(s) (for example, root intrusion, grease deposition, etc.); and
5. Description of how the volume estimations were calculated.
Total Annual Spill Information:
1. Estimated total annual spill volume;
2. Description of spill corrective actions, including at minimum:
o Local regulatory enforcement action taken against the sewer lateral owner in response to a spill, as applicable, and
o System operation, maintenance and program modifications implemented to prevent repeated spill occurrences at the same spill location.
4.5. Sewer System Telemetry Records
The Enrollee shall maintain the following sewer system telemetry records if used to document compliance with this General Order, and previous General Order 2006-0003-DWQ as applicable, including spill volume estimates:
• Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system(s); • Alarm system(s);
• Flow monitoring device(s) or other instrument(s) used to estimate sewage flow rates, and/or volumes;
• Computerized maintenance management system records; and • Asset management-related records.
4.6. Sewer System Management Plan Implementation Records The Enrollee shall maintain records documenting the Enrollee’s implementation of its Sewer System Management Plan, including documents supporting its Sewer System Management Plan audits, corrections, modifications, and updates to the Sewer System Management Plan.
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E1 – NOTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING
AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS December 6, 2022
E1 - 23
4.7. Audit Records
The Enrollee shall maintain, at minimum, the following records pertaining to its Sewer System Management Plan audits, and other internal audits:
• Completed audit documents and findings;
• Name and contact information of staff and/or consultants that conducted or involved in the audit; and
• Follow-up actions based on audit findings.
4.8. Equipment Records
The Enrollee shall maintain a log of all owned and leased sewer system cleaning, operational, maintenance, construction, and rehabilitation equipment.
4.9. Work Orders
The Enrollee shall maintain record of work orders for operations and maintenance projects.
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E2 – SUMMARY TABLES FOR NOTIFICATION, December 6, 2022
MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
E2 - 1
ATTACHMENT E2 – SUMMARY OF NOTIFICATION, MONITORING AND REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
This Attachment provides a summary of notification, monitoring and reporting requirements, by spill category, and for Enrollee-owned and/or operated laterals as required in Attachment E1 of this General Order, for quick reference purposes only.
Table E2-1
Spill Category 1: Spills to Surface Waters
Spill
Requirement Due Method
Notification
Within two (2) hours of the Enrollee’s knowledge of
a Category 1 spill of 1,000 gallons or greater,
discharging or threatening to discharge to surface
waters:
Notify the California Office of Emergency Services
and obtain a notification control number.
California Office
of Emergency
Services at:
(800) 852-7550
(Section 1 of
Attachment E1)
Monitoring
• Conduct spill-specific monitoring;
• Conduct water quality sampling of the receiving
water within 18 hours of initial knowledge of spill of
50,000 gallons or greater to surface waters.
(Section 2 of
Attachment E1)
Reporting
• Submit Draft Spill Report within three (3)
business days of the Enrollee’s knowledge of the
spill;
• Submit Certified Spill Report within 15 calendar
days of the spill end date;
• Submit Technical Report within 45 calendar days
after the spill end date for a Category 1 spill in
which 50,000 gallons or greater discharged to
surface waters; and
• Submit Amended Spill Report within 90 calendar
days after the spill end date.
(Section 3.1 of
Attachment E1)
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E2 – SUMMARY TABLES FOR NOTIFICATION, December 6, 2022
MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
E2 - 2
Table E2-2
Spill Category 2: Spills of 1,000 Gallons or Greater That Do Not Discharge to Surface Waters
Spill
Requirements Due Method
Notification
Within two (2) hours of the Enrollee’s knowledge of
a Category 2 spill of 1,000 gallons or greater,
discharging or threatening to discharge to waters of
the State:
Notify California Office of Emergency Services and
obtain a notification control number.
California Office of
Emergency
Services at: (800)
852-7550
(Section 1 of
Attachment E1)
Monitoring Conduct spill-specific monitoring. (Section 2 of Attachment E1)
Reporting
• Submit Draft Spill Report within three (3)
business days of the Enrollee’s knowledge of the
spill;
• Submit Certified Spill Report within 15 calendar
days of the spill end date; and
• Submit Amended Spill Report within 90 calendar
days after the spill end date.
(Section 3.2 of
Attachment E1)
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E2 – SUMMARY TABLES FOR NOTIFICATION, December 6, 2022
MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
E2 - 3
Table E2-3
Spill Category 3: Spills of Equal or Greater than 50 Gallons and Less than 1,000 Gallons That Does Not Discharge to Surface Waters
Spill
Requirements Due Method
Notification Not Applicable Not Applicable
Monitoring Conduct spill-specific monitoring. (Section 2 of Attachment E1)
Reporting
• Submit monthly Certified Spill Report to the online
CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database within
30 calendars days after the end of the month in
which the spills occur; and
• Submit Amended Spill Reports within 90 calendar
days after the Certified Spill Report due date.
(Section 3.3 and 3.5 of
Attachment E1)
Table E2-4
Spill Category 4: Spills Less Than 50 Gallons That Do Not Discharge to Surface Waters Spill
Requirements Due Method
Notification Not Applicable Not Applicable
Monitoring Conduct spill-specific monitoring. (Section 2 of Attachment E1)
Reporting
• If, during any calendar month, Category 4 spills
occur, certify monthly, the estimated total spill
volume exiting the sanitary sewer system, and the
total number of all Category 4 spills into the online
CIWQS Sanitary Sewer System Database, within
30 days after the end of the calendar month in
which the spills occurred.
• Upload and certify a report, in an acceptable digital format, of all Category 4 spills to the online CIWQS
Sanitary Sewer System Database, by February 1st
after the end of the calendar year in which the
spills occur.
(Section 3.4, 3.6, 3.7
and 4.4 of Attachment
E1)
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT E2 – SUMMARY TABLES FOR NOTIFICATION, December 6, 2022
MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
E2 - 4
Table E2-5
Enrollee Owned and/or Operated Lateral Spills That Do Not Discharge to Surface Waters Spill
Requirements Due Method
Notification
Within two (2) hours of the Enrollee’s knowledge of a
spill of 1,000 gallons or greater, from an enrollee-
owned and/or operated lateral, discharging or
threatening to discharge to waters of the State:
Notify California Office of Emergency Services and
obtain a notification control number.
Not applicable to a spill of less than 1,000 gallons.
California Office of
Emergency Services
at: (800) 852-7550
(Section 1 of Attachment
E1)
Monitoring Conduct visual monitoring. (Section 2 of Attachment E1)
Reporting
• Upload and certify a report, in an acceptable digital format, of all lateral spills (that do not discharge to a surface water) to the online CIWQS Sanitary
Sewer System Database, by February 1st after the
end of the calendar year in which the spills occur.
• Report a lateral spill of any volume that discharges
to a surface water as a Category 1 spill.
(Sections 3.6, 3.7 and
4.4 of Attachment E1)
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT F – REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL December 6, 2022
BOARD CONTACT INFORMATION
F - 1
ATTACHMENT F – REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CONTACT
INFORMATION
This Attachment provides a map, list of counties, and contact information to assist the Enrollee in identifying the corresponding Regional Water Quality Control Board office, for all Regional Water Board notification requirements in this General Order.
Region 1 -- North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Lake, Marin, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, and Trinity counties.
[email protected] or (707) 576-2220
Region 2 -- San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, Santa Clara (Northern most part of Morgan Hill), San Mateo, Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano counties.
[email protected] or (510) 622-2369
Region 3 -- Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Santa Clara (most of Morgan Hill), San Mateo (Southern portion), Santa Cruz, San Benito, Monterey, Kern (small portions), San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura (Northern portion) counties.
[email protected] or (805) 549-3147
Region 4 -- Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Los Angeles, Ventura counties (small portions of Kern and Santa Barbara counties). [email protected] or (213) 576-6600
Attachment 2
STATEWIDE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS GENERAL ORDER 2022-0103-DWQ ATTACHMENT F – REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL December 6, 2022
BOARD CONTACT INFORMATION
F - 2
Region 5 -- Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Rancho Cordova (Sacramento) Office: Colusa, Lake, Sutter, Yuba, Sierra, Nevada, Placer, Yolo, Napa, (North East), Solano (West), Sacramento, El Dorado, Amador, Calaveras, San Joaquin, Contra Costa (East), Stanislaus, Tuolumne counties.
[email protected] or (916) 464-3291 Fresno Office: Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, and Tulare counties, and small portions of San Benito and San Luis Obispo counties.
[email protected] or (559) 445-5116 Redding Office: Butte, Glen, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou, and Tehama counties.
[email protected] or (530) 224-4845 Region 6 -- Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Lake Tahoe Office: Alpine, Modoc (East), Lassen (East side and Eagle Lake), Sierra, Nevada, Placer, El Dorado counties.
[email protected] or (530) 542-5400 Victorville Office: Mono, Inyo, Kern (East), San Bernardino, Los Angeles (North East corner) counties.
[email protected] or (760) 241-6583 Region 7 -- Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Imperial county and portions of San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego counties.
[email protected] or (760) 346-7491
Region 8 -- Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino counties.
[email protected] or (951) 782-4130
Region 9 -- San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board:
San Diego county and portions of Orange and Riverside counties.
[email protected] or (619) 516-1990
End of Order 2022-0103-DWQ
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix C
Org Chart and Contact Information for
responders, data submitters, and Legally
Responsible Officials
Attachment 2
Appendix C: Spill Emergency Response Team Organiza�on Chart (as of June 2023)
LRO
408-730-7578
LRO
408-730-7763
Data Submitter
408-664-8466
Data Submitter
408-730-7710
Data Submitter
408-730-7722
Responders
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix D
List of On-Call Plumbing Contractors and
Emergency Response Contractors
Attachment 2
List of Contractors – Emergency Responses & Repairs
• Able Septic Tank Service, 408-377-9990
• Bay Area Trenchless, 408-981-5730
• Castillo Plumbing, 415-786-2564
• Rain For Rent, 925-679-2803
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix E
Abbreviated Standard Operation Procedure (SOP)
for Sanitary Sewer Spill Response
Attachment 2
(17) Sanitary Sewer Spill Response
1. Background:
The City of Sunnyvale will clear blockages and mitigate sewage overflows from city owned sanitary sewer.
2. Scope:
This document presents the materials, the procedures to follow, and the safety items to restore flow and recover spill contents emanating from city owned sewer structures.
3. Materials:
3.1 Combination truck
3.2 Stand-by truck
3.3 Spill Response Report
3.4 GIS and/or block map book
3.5 Manhole hook
3.6 Absorbent (Spill Shark)
3.7 Camera (portable or cell phone)
3.8 Atmosphere Tester (4 Gas Analyzer)
3.9 Sampling Equipment
4. Procedure:
4.1 Ensure that all personnel are using prescribed personal safety/protective equipment (i.e.; ear protections, safety glasses, safety vest, appropriate foot wear, etc.) prior to beginning any work.
4.2 Ensure that all safety signage and warning devices and traffic control are in place prior to beginning any work.
4.3 Take pictures when arriving. Also photograph various points of spill mitigation at various locations.
4.4 Contain spill contents and protect storm drain inlets.
4.5 Notify supervisor as soon as possible and call for assistance.
4.6 Check GIS and/or Sewer Maps for ID numbers, location, and orientation of sewer assets.
4.7 Locate upstream and downstream manholes in suspected area.
4.8 Use atmosphere tester to assure safe gas levels in manhole prior to opening lid.=
4.9 Pull manhole lid on downstream manhole check for flow. Hydro-flush upstream if no flow and upstream manhole is holding sewer to restore flow.
4.10 Remove manhole lid on upstream manhole and monitor flow conditions.
4.11 Follow procedures in Sunnyvale Spill and Surcharge Response Plan.
4.12 Vacuum spill contents at furthest point of containment. Wash spill contents with fresh water toward vacuum unit (“wash and walk”).
4.13 Hydro-flush and vacuum affected storm system if applicable.
4.14 Fill out all associated paperwork making note of work performed and findings.
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix F
Spill Response Report Template
Attachment 2
INCIDENT SUMMARY
Recorded By: _____________________________ Weather Condition: Clear Rain Other __________________
Spi
ll Location: ____________________________________________________________ (WO #____________________)
Caller Name: __________________________________________________________ Phone: ____________________________
Receipt of Report*: Date: _____/_____/_____ Time: ______:______ AM PM Call Received By: __________________ Call Dispatch: Date: _____/_____/_____ Time: ______:______ AM PM Assigned To: _____________________ Spill Start*: Date: _____/_____/_____ Time: ______:______ AM PM Spill End: Date: _____/_____/_____ Time: ______:______ AM PM *Receipt of Report & Spill Start Time should be 15 minutes prior to Call Dispatch Time
Response Crew: _____________________, ______________________, _____________________, _____________________
_____________________, ______________________, _____________________, _____________________
Arrival Time: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Contacted Supervisor: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Requested Additional EE’s/Equip: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Requested Additional EE’s/Equip: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Requested Additional EE’s/Equip: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Containment Implemented: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Clean Up Begin: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Clean Up Complete: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Departure Time: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM _________________________ Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM _________________________ Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM _________________________ Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Report to Cal-OES: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Report to CIWQS: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Caller Interview: Date: ________/________/________ Time:_____:_____ AM PM Were signs posted? Yes _____ No ______
Were samples taken? Yes _____ No ______
Samples must be taken within 18 hours of a spill 50,000 gallons or greater that discharges to a surface water.
Attachment 2
SPILL LOCATION
Observed spill from:
Manhole ID________________________________ Lift Station ID ________________________________
Clean Out Address ________________________________ Building Address ________________________________
Other (Specify) ______________________________________________________________________________________
Clos
est Cross Street/Landmark _____________________________________________________________________________
Comments: ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Describe the extent of spill and spill boundaries:
Spill Destination: Building Paved Surface Storm Sys. Curb/Gutter Unpaved Surface Water
If Spill Destination is Surface Water, photos of receiving water must be taken including: Waterbody bank erosion, Floating matter, Water surface sheen (potentially from oil and grease), Discoloration of receiving water, and Impact to the receiving water.
Attachment 2
SPILL VOLUME WORKSHEET
The
purpose of this worksheet is to capture the data and method(s) used in estimating the volume of a spill. Since there are many variables and often unknown values involved, this calculation is just an estimate. Additionally, it is useful to use more than one method, if possible, to validate your estimate.
The following methods and tools are the approved methods in the SSMP and ERP. Check all methods and tools that you used:
Eyeball Estimate Method
Measured Volume Method
Duration and Flow Rate Method (Account for diurnal flow pattern for long duration) Other (explain) i.e., estimated daily use per capita upstream or meter @ Pump Station.
Eyeball Estimate Method: Imagine the following container(s) of water tipped over to match the quantity observed.
Size of container(s) How many of this Size? Total Volume Estimated
1 gal. bucket X 1
5 gal. bucket X 5
32 gal. trash can X 32
55 gal. trash can X 55
Total Volume Estimated
Using Eyeball Method
Measured Volume Method: (this may take several calculations and may have to break down the odd shaped spill to rectangles, circles, and polygons). It is important when guessing depth to measure several locations and use an average depth if possible. Use a separate sheet, if necessary, to sketch the shapes and show your work. Reference the West Bay Sanitary District “Initial Spill Calculation Worksheet” for appropriate formulas and conversions.
1. Draw a sketch of the spill and/or use a photocopy of block map to draw on and attach it.
2. Draw shapes and dimensions used on your sketch.
3. Use correct formula for various shapes.
Rectangle L x W x D
Circle 3.14 x R² x D
Polygons see reference chart Show formula used
Attachment 2
Duration and Flow Rate Method worksheet:
Start Date and Time 1.
End Date and Time 2.
Total time elapsed of spill event (subtract line 1
from line 2. Show time in minutes) 3.
Average flow rate GPM (account for diurnal
pattern) 4.
Total volume estimate using duration and flow rate
method (Line 3 x Line 4) 5.
List Assumptions made to arrive at the total estimated spill volume:
SPILL CONTAINMENT
Containment Implemented: Date: _____/_____/_____ Time: ______:______ AM PM
Containment Measures: Plugged Storm Drain Washed Down Vacuum Up Water/Sewage
Other Measures: __________________________________________________________________
Estimated
Total spill volume
to Reach Surface
Water
Estimated
Total spill volume
to Reach Land
Estimated
Total spill volume
to Reach Drainage
Conveyance System
Estimated
Total spill volume
Estimated
Total spill volume
Recovered
Estimated
spill discharge rate
(gallons per minute)
Attachment 2
SPILL CATAGORIZATION
Spill Category: Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
CLEAN UP
Clean Up Begin: Date: _________/_______/________ Time: ___________:__________ AM PM
Clean Up Complete: Date : _________/_______/________ Time: ___________:__________ AM PM
Describe Clean Up Operations: _________ _____________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________: Gallons – Estimate Volume of Spill Recovered (do not count wash down water)
CAUSE OF SPILL
Spill Cause: Roots Grease Debris Vandalism Lift Sta. Fail Other _________________________________
Spill cause to be determined by CCTV inspection (Attach TV Report to this form)
Final Cause Determination:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Follow-up or Corrective Action Taken:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Answer These Questions
#1 - Was there a discharge to a surface water? Yes _____ No ______ #2 - Was there a discharge to drainage conveyance system that was “NOT” fully captured & returned to the sanitary sewer system? Yes _____ No ______
If the answer is “yes” to any of the questions above, this spill is a Category 1. (Notification within 2-hours is required if Cat. 1 Spill is greater than 1,000 gallons)
#3 - Is the spill 1,000 gallons or greater? Yes _____ No ______
If the answer is “yes” to question #3, this spill is a Category 2. (Notification within 2-hours is required)
#4 - Is the spill between 50 gallons and 999 gallons? Yes _____ No ______
If the answer is “yes” to question #4, this spill is a Category 3.
#5 - Is the spill less than 50 gallons? Yes _____ No ______
If the answer is “yes” to question #5, this spill is a Category 4
Attachment 2
Notes:
Attachment 2
SUPERVISOR REPORTING
Report to Cal-OES: Date:_____________ _______:_______ AM PM (Cat.1 & 2 Only) (800) 852-7550 By: _____________
Contr
ol Number provided by Cal-OES: _____________________________________________________________
Name of Person Contacted: ______________ _____________________________________ or Left Message:
Report to CIWQS: D ate:_____________ _______:_______ AM PM By: ___________________
CIWQ
S ID: ____________________________________________________________________________________
GPS Coordinates: Latitude ___________________________ Longitude ___________________________
Name of Receiving Water Body: _________________________________________________________________ Type: Drainage Conveyance System Creek Channel Other ___________________________
CALLER INTERVIEW
Contacted: Dat e: _________/________/_________ Time: __________:__________ AM PM
Telephone In Person Left Message at _________:_________
Where did you see sewage spill from? Manhole Inside Building C/O
Wet well/Lift station Other___________________________________________________________
Time Caller noticed spill: _________:_________ AM PM Date: _____________/____________/____________
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Did Caller notice if spill had reached a storm drain or surface waters? Yes _____ No ______
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Last time Caller observed NO
Spill occurring: __________:__________ AM PM Date: _________/________/________
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Other Comments regarding spill start time:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix G
Surcharge Response Report Template
Attachment 2
Date: Time Call Received:
Weather Condition: Clear Rain
Location:
Cross Street:
Time arrived at site:
First Responder:
Crew Members:
Downstream Upstream
Manhole: Manhole:
Distance between
Mainline size: Manholes:
Describe cause and location of blockage (include pictures if taken):
Additional comments:
Attach a copy of the service report, flushing report, site map & all pictures to this report Televise Date:
Recommendations:
City of Sunnyvale
Environmental Services Department
SURCHARGE RESPONSE REPORT
Dispatched to:
Time normal flow restored:
version 2023.5.2
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix H
Post-Spill Response Assessment Form
Attachment 2
SPILL LOCATION
Spil
l Location: ____________________________________________________________ (WO #____________________)
Manhole ID________________________________ Lift Station ID ________________________________
Clean Out Address ________________________________ Building Address ________________________________
Other (Specify) ______________________________________________________________________________________
NOTIFICATION & COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES
Were notification procedures adhered to?
Yes No
Were notification procedures effective?
Yes No
RESPONSE PROCEDURES
Were response time goals met?
Yes No
Were safety procedures adhered to?
Yes No
Were safety procedures effective?
Yes No
Attachment 2
Were initial response procedures adhered to?
Yes No
Were initial response procedures effective?
Yes No
Were containment procedures adhered to?
Yes No
Were containment procedures effective?
Yes No
Were clean up and recovery procedures adhered to?
Yes No
Were clean up and recovery procedures effective?
Yes No
Attachment 2
Were sewer back up procedures adhered to?
Yes No
Were sewer back up procedures effective?
Yes No
Were chain of custody procedures adhered to?
Yes No
Was failure analysis investigation performed and documented?
Yes No
REPORTING & NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Were reporting and notification timeline requirements met?
Yes No
Attachment 2
DOCUMENTATION
Was spill file created?
Yes No
Was QA/QC performed to ensure field data matched CIWQS data?
Yes No
RECOMMENDED CHANGES
N/A
ATTENDEES
FACILITATED BY
Date:
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sanitary Sewer Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix I
Category 4 Spill Recordkeeping Template
Attachment 2
Spill No. Spill Date Spill Start Time Location Spill Volume Estimation Method Cause(s)
System failure
location (e.g.,
main, PS, etc.)
Response
activities
Reached SD
system? (Y/D) SD Location Volume
Recovered
Volume
Remained in SD
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
www.hydroscience.com
APPENDIX 7
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan
City of Sunnyvale Pretreatment Inspection Enforcement
Response Plan
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Pretreatment Inspec�on
Enforcement Response Plan
Revised on 2/28/2024
Environmental Services Department
Regulatory Programs Division
February 28, 2024
Attachment 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 1 II. ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................ 2 III. DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 IV. LEGAL AUTHORITY ................................................................................................................ 8 V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................. 9
1.0. Environmental Compliance Inspector ..........................................................................9
2.0. Laboratory/Field Technician ..........................................................................................9
3.0. Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector ............................................................. 10
4.0. Regulatory Programs Division Manager ...................................................................... 10
5.0. Environmental Services Department Director ............................................................ 10
6.0. City Attorney ................................................................................................................. 10 VI. IDENTIFYING AND INVESTIGATING INSTANCES OF NONCOMPLIANCE .......................................... 11
1.0. Industrial User Inventory ................................................................................................ 11
2.0. Inspection Program ...................................................................................................... 11
3.0. Monitoring Program ...................................................................................................... 12 VII. INDUSTRIAL USER REPORTING ............................................................................................... 14 VIII. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES ............................................................................................... 15
1.0. Timeframes for Enforcement Response ...................................................................... 15
2.0. Types of Enforcement Action ...................................................................................... 15 IX. TYPES OF VIOLATIONS ........................................................................................................ 17
1.0. Minor Violation: ............................................................................................................. 17
2.0. Moderate Violation: ..................................................................................................... 17
3.0. Severe Violation: ........................................................................................................... 17 X. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS ..................................................................................................... 19
1.0. Distribution of Educational Materials ........................................................................... 19
2.0. Verbal Notice (VN) ....................................................................................................... 19
3.0. W
arning Notice (WN) ................................................................................................... 19
4.0. Notice of Violation (NOV) ............................................................................................ 20
5.0. Administrative Citation (AC) ........................................................................................ 20
6.0. Administrative Order (AO) ........................................................................................... 20
7.0. Compliance Meeting (CM) ......................................................................................... 21
8.0. Time Compliance Schedule ........................................................................................ 21 Attachment 2
9.0. Administrative Hearing ................................................................................................. 21 XI. RECORDKEEPING ............................................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................. 25 ATTACHMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 32 ATTACHMENT A ........................................................................................................................... 33 ATTACHMENT B ........................................................................................................................... 39 ATTACHMENT C ........................................................................................................................... 42
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Enforcement Response ...................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 2: Hearing Process .................................................................................................................................. 23
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Unpermitted Discharge ....................................................................................................................... 34 Table 2: Effluent Limitations or General Discharge Prohibitions .................................................................... 35 Table 3: Notification ........................................................................................................................................... 35 Table 4: Reporting .............................................................................................................................................. 36 Table 5: Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................. 37 Table 6: Pollution Prevention ............................................................................................................................. 37 Table 7: Significance of pH Violations .............................................................................................................. 38
Attachment 2
I. BACKGROUND
In 1990, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated amendments to the General Pretreatment Regulations to require all Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) with approved pretreatment programs to develop and implement enforcement response plans (40 CFR Part 403.8(f)(5). The EPA hoped that the POTW plans would be based on the same management principles and internal controls that have been used successfully in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program and issued its “Guidance for Developing Control Authority Enforcement Response Plans” in September 1989
1. In its guidance document, the EPA identified the principles below that describe the process for obtaining and evaluating information on industrial use compliance: identifying noncompliance; selecting an appropriate enforcement action; and resolving noncompliance in a timely, fair, and consistent manner. The principles establish a framework for managing an enforcement process, while providing flexibility to develop management procedures best suited to program operations and resources.
• Establish responsibilities, procedures, and timeframes to provide information to all le vels of the organization.
• Maintain a complete and accurate Industrial User inventory. • Collect and dispense information.
• Conduct inspections and sampling of Industrial User based on a systematic plan. • Ensure compliance screening of all relevant data.
• Perform an enforcement evaluation, where appropriate. • Institute formal enforcement action and follow-up, where necessary.
1 Also see “Pretreatment Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Guidance”, EPA, July 1986.
Attachment 2
II. ACRONYMS
AC – Administrative Citation
ACR – Administrative Citation Referral
AO – Administrative Orders
AP – Administrative Penalty
BMP – Best Management Practice
CC – Consistently Achieving Compliance
CA – Control Authority
CFR – Code of Federal Regulations
CIG – Compliance Inspection Group
CIU – Categorical Industrial User
CM – Compliance Meeting
CWA – Clean Water Act
ECI – Environmental Compliance Inspector
ERG – Enforcement Response Guide
ERP – Enforcement Response Plan
HO – Hearing Officer
IC – Inconsistently Compliant
IND – Industrial/Commercial Site
IU – Industrial User
NPDES – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOV – Notice of Violation
NS – Not Sampled
POTW – Publicly Owned Treatment Works
RP – Responsible Party
SECI – Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector
SIU – Significant Industrial User
SMC – Sunnyvale Municipal Code
TCS – Time Compliance Schedule
VN – Verbal Notice
WN – Warning Notice
Attachment 2
III. DEFINITIONS
1. Administrative Orders (AO) – E nforcement documents that direct Industrial Users to undertake or to cease specified activities by specified deadlines. The terms of an administrative order may or may not be negotiated with Industrial User. Administrative orders may incorporate compliance schedules, administrative penalties, and termination of service orders. Administrative orders include:
a) Finding of Noncompliance – A written notice instructing the Industrial User to identify and correct causes on noncompliance. The notice may require a response from the Industrial User identifying corrective actions taken.
b) Consent Order – D ocuments noncompliance and includes actions required to be accomplished by specific dates (milestones). Consent Orders are developed during compliance meetings and terms are agreed upon by both parties.
c) Compliance Order – D irects the Industrial User to achieve or restore compliance by a date specified in the order. A compliance order is often a stipulated agreement that may include a compliance schedule, the payment of monetary penalties or cost recovery, and the imposition of fines when milestones are not met.
d) Cease and Desist Order (CDO) – Directs an Industrial User to cease illegal or unauthorized discharges immediately or to terminate its discharge altogether.
e) Termination of Service or Permit revocation – A notification to an Industrial User of the intent to revoke the Industrial User’s Permit or the termination of service.
2. Administrative Penalty (AP) – A punitive monetary charge assessed by the Control Authority rather than a court. The purpose of the penalty is to recover the economic benefit of noncompliance and to deter future violations.
3. Average Monthly Discharge Limit – The highest allowable average of daily discharges over a calendar month, calculated as the sum of all daily discharges measured during that month divided by the number of days on which monitoring was performed (except in the case of fecal coliform).
4. Best Management Practice (BMP) – Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to implement the prohibitions listed in (Sunnyvale Municipal Code (SMC)) Section 12.12.020 (a) and (b), and the local limits on wastewater in Section 12.12.120(c). BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw materials storage.
5. Bypass – The intentional diversion of wastestreams from any portion of an Industrial User’s treatment facility. (Sunnyvale Municipal Code (SMC)) Section 12.12.340 (c).
6. Categorical Industrial User (CIU) – A n Industrial User subject to a categorical pretreatment standard or categorical standard.
7. Categorical Pretreatment Standard or Categorical Standard – A ny regulation containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by EPA in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1317) that apply to a specific category of Industrial User and that appear in 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N, Parts 405-471.
8. Cease and Desist Order – Directs an Industrial User to cease illegal or unauthorized discharges immediately or to terminate the discharge altogether.
9. Clean Water Act (CWA) – The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251, et seq.
Attachment 2
10. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) – A codification of the final rules published daily in the Federal Register.
Title 40 of the CFR contains the environmental regulations.
11. Compliance Order – A compliance order directs the Industrial User to achieve or restore compliance by a date specified in the order. A compliance order is often a stipulated agreement that may include a compliance schedule, the payment of monetary penalties or cost recovery, and the imposition of fines when milestones are not met.
12. Composite Sample – A flow-proportional or time-proportioned sample collected manually or automatically, either discretely or continuously. M anual compositing requires a minimum of four individual samples , that when combined and mixed , form one representative sample that is an alyzed to determine the conditions during a specific period.
13. Compliance Meeting (CM) – A meeting with the Industrial User to discuss the causes of noncompliance, corrective actions to achieve compliance, and the time frames for the implementation or corrective actions.
14. Compliance Time Schedule – A timetable for the implementation of corrective actions (milestones) by an Industrial User to achieve consistent compliance with all pretreatment program requirements.
15. Consent Order – A Consent order , also known as a Time Compliance Schedule (TCS), documents noncompliance and includes actions required to be accomplished by specific dates (milestones). Consent Orders are developed during compliance meetings and terms are agreed to by both parties.
16. Consistently Achieving Compliance (CC) – Compliance w ith all applicable federal and local standards as confirmed by POTW sampling, showing no more than one violation of any individual parameter during the quarter, if such violation was not an obvious continuation of a problem detected in the previous quarter and is not a severe violation of the City sewer ordinance.
17. Control Authority (CA) – The entity directly administering and enforcing Pretreatment Standards and requirements against Industrial Users. For purposes of this Enforcement Response Plan, the Control Authority is the approved POTW Pretreatment Program.
18. Daily Maximum Discharge Li mit – The maximum allowable discharge of pollutant during a calendar day.
Where daily maximum limits are expressed in units of mass, the daily discharge is the total mass discharged over the course of the day. Where daily maximum limits are expressed in terms of a concentration, the daily discharge is the average pollutant concentration derived from all measurements taken that day.
19. Diluting Water – N oncontact cooling water, boiler blowdown, domestic sewage, groundwater, stormwater, surface drainage, reverse osmosis reject or potable waters that are not part of an industrial process and do not contain priority pollutants, but are combined with industrial process wastewater prior to the monitoring point for industrial waste discharge. SMC 12.04.030 (12).
20. Domestic Wastewater – Consists of 1) wastewater from normal residential activities including, but not limited to, wastewater from kitchen, bath, and laundry facilities, or 2) wastewater from the personal sanitary conveniences (toilets, showers, bathtubs, fountains, non-commercial sinks, and similar structures) of commercial, industrial or institutional buildings, provided that the wastewater exhibits c haracteristics which are similar to those of wastewater from normal residential activities. Specifically excluded from this definition is wastewater from commercial, industrial, or institutional laundries or food preparation facilities.
21. Effluent Limit – The maximum pollutant concentration in wastewaters discharged from industrial and commercial users into the sanitary sewer system. Effluent Limits include discharge limits established by Federal, State, and Local agencies.
Attachment 2
22. Grab Sample – A single sample collected at a particular time and place which represents the composition of the wastewater only at that time and place.
23. Good Faith Effort or Progress – Prompt and vigorous pollution control measures undertaken by the discharger which shows that extraordinary efforts (not a “business -as-usual” approach) have been made to achieve compliance.
24. Inconsistently Achieving Compliance (IC) – Having more than one violation of the same parameter during the most recent quarter, and the violations do not meet the definition of significant noncompliance, or having only one violation in the quarter but it is a continuation of a problem detected the previous quarter, or a severe violation of the City sewer ordinance. A severe violation is a violation that is five times the most stringent limit for metals; or below 2.0 or above 12.5 for pH; or known to be intentional.
25. Industrial User or User (IU) – A source of indirect discharge.
26. Indirect Discharge or Discharge – The introduction of pollutants into the POTW from any non-domestic source.
27. Interference – A discharge which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources:
a) Inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use or disposal; and
b) Is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the City’s NPDES permit (including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation) or of the prevention of sewage sludge use or disposal in compliance with the following statutory provisions and regulations or permits issued thereunder (or more stringent state or local regulations): Section 405 of the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (including Title II, more commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and including state regulations contained in any state sludge management plan prepared pursuant to subtitle D of the SWDA), the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act.
28. Local Limits – S pecific discharge limits developed and enforced by the City upon industrial or commercial facilities to implement the general and specific discharge prohibitions listed in SMC Chapter 12.12.020.
29. Notice of Violation (NOV) – An official notice that a significant violation of discharge regulations has occurred.
A written response to the NOV identifying causes of the violation and corrective actions taken to prevent recurring violations is required within two weeks (14 calendar days or 10 business days) of the mailing date .
Notices of violation are authorized under SMC 12.18.030.
30. Not Sampled (NS) – Industrial Users who have closed down or ceased discharge sometime during the calendar year will have a compliance status of NS for the quarter in which they closed down, as a well as for all subsequent quarters. New Industrial Users will show a compliance status of NS until the quarter in which they begin operation and are sampled.
31. Pass Through – A discharge which exits the POTW into waters of the United States in quantities or concentrations which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the City’s NPDES permit, including an increase in magnitude or duration of a violation.
32. pH – A measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution, expressed in standard units.
33. Point Source – Any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance from which pollutants are or may be discharged.
34. Pollutant – Dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, filter backwash, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded Attachment 2
equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt, municipal, agricultural and industrial wastes, and certain characteristics of wastewater (e.g., pH, temperature, TSS, turbidity, color, BOD, COD, toxicity, or odor).
35. Pretreatment or Treatment – The reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater prior to, or in lieu of, introducing such pollutants into the POTW. The reduction or alteration can be obtained by physical, chemical, or biological processes; by process changes; or by other means, except by diluting the concentration of the p ollutant unless allowed by an applicable pretreatment standard.
36. Process Wastewater – Water, which, during manufacturing or processing, comes into contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, byproduct, or waste product.
37. Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) – A treatment works, as defined by Section 212 of the Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1292), which is owned by the City. This definition includes any devices equipment or sewerage systems used in the collection, storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature and any conveyances that convey wastewater to a treatment plant.
38. Self-Monitoring – Sampling and analyses performed by a facility to determine compliance with a permit or other regulatory requirements.
39. Significant Industrial User (SIU) –
a) An Industrial User subject to categorical pretreatment standards; or b) An Industrial User that:
(i) Discharges an average of twenty-five thousand gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the POTW (excluding sanitary, noncontact cooling and boiler blowdown wastewater), (ii) Contributes a process wastestream which makes up five percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the POTW treatment plant, or (iii) Is designated as such by the City on the basis that it has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW’s operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement.
40. Significant Noncompliance (SNC) – Any violations, which are:
a) Chronic violations of wastewater discharge limits, defined as those in which sixty-six percent or more of all the measurements taken for the same pollutant parameter taken during a six -month period exceed (by any magnitude) a numeric pretreatment standard or requirement, including those defined in Chapter 12.12 of the Sunnyvale Municipal Code.
b) Technical review criteria (TRC) vio lations, defined as those in which thirty -three percent or more of wastewater measurements taken for each pollutant parameter during a six -month period equals or exceeds the product of the numeric pretreatment standard or requirement including those define d in Chapter 12.12 of the Sunnyvale Municipal Code, multiplied by the applicable criteria (TRC = 1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, oils and grease, and 1.2 for all other pollutants except pH); c) Any other violation of a pretreatment standard or requirement as defined by Chapter 12.12 of the Sunnyvale Municipal Code that the director determines has caused, alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass through, including endangering the health of POTW personnel or the general public;
Attachment 2
d) Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to the public or to the environment, or has resulted in the director’s exercise of its’ emergency authority to halt or prevent such a discharge;
e) Failure to meet, within ninety days of the scheduled date, a compliance schedule milestone contained in an individual wastewater discharge permit or enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, or attaining final compliance; f) Failure to provide within forty -five days after the due date, any required reports, including baseline monitoring reports, reports on compliance with categorical pretreatment standard deadlines, periodic self-monitoring reports, and reports on compliance with compliance schedules; g) Failure to accurately report noncompliance; or
h) Any other violation(s), which may include a violation of best management practices, which the director determines will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the local pretreatment program.
41. Slug Load of Slug Discharge – Any discharge at a flow rate or concentration, which could cause a violation of the prohibited discharge standards in Section 12.12.020 of this title. A slug discharge is any discharge of a nonroutine, episodic nature, including but not limited to an accidental spill or a noncustomary batch discharge, which has a reasonable potential to cause interference or pass through, or in any other way violate the POTW’s regulations, local limits or permit conditions.
42. Termination of Service – A notification to an Industrial User of the intent to revoke the Industrial User’s Permit or the termination of service.
43. Verbal Notice (VN) – A warning communicated to the Industrial User orally. A VN does not require a response from the Industrial User and may be given during an inspection or by phone call. The violation is usually very minor or within the range of analytical error for discharge violations.
44. Violation Types
a) Minor violations include: 1) exceeding a discharge limit by 1.4 times or less for BOD, TSS, fats, oils and grease, or 1.2 times or less for all other pollutants except pH and toxic pollutants, or 1.4 times or less for conventional pollutants, 2) submitting a required report no more than 5 days late, and 3) an isolated violation of a permit condition. b) Moderate violations include: 1) exceeding a discharge limit by 5 times or less for toxic and conventional pollutants, 2) submitting a required report 6 or more days late, and 3) recurring or uncorrected violations of a permit condition. c) Severe violations include 1) exceeding a discharge limit by more than 5 times the limit for toxic and conventional pollutants, 2) submitting a required report more than 30 days late, and any violation meeting the definition of Significant Noncompliance.
45. Upset – An exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with the permit limit because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
46. Warning Notice (WN) – A written notice that a moderate violation has occurred. The WN directs the Industrial User to take actions to correct the violation, and does require a formal response.
Attachment 2
IV. L EGAL AUTHORITY
The City of Sunnyvale Municipal Code (SMC) Chapter 12.12. Sewer Use Regulations provides the authority to conduct onsite inspections of all facilities discharging to the City’s sanitary sewer system. This includes inspections at commercial, retail, and industrial facilities.
Following is a list of common SMCs that provide legal authority to implement pretreatment inspection programs:
- SMC 12.12.012 Users shall provide wastewater treatment as necessary to comply with this title and shall achieve compliance with all categorical pretreatment standards, local limits, and the prohibitions set out in Section 12.12.020 of this chapter within the time limitations specified by EPA, the state, or the director, whichever is more stringent.
- SMC 12. 12.020 No user shall in troduce or cause to be introduced into the POTW any pollutant or wastewater which causes pass through or interference. These general prohibitions apply to all users of the POTW whether they are subject to categorical pretreatment standards or any other national, state, or local pretreatment standards or requirements.
- SMC 12.12.278 The director may require submission of information to evaluate the implementation and/or require the implementation of best management practices (BMPs). (Ord. 2490-94 § 1).
For a more complete list visit Chapter 12.12. SEWER USE REGULATIONS (qcode.us)
Attachment 2
V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The City’s pretreatment inspection programs are implemented by the Environmental Services Department, Regulatory Programs Division, Compliance Inspection Group (CIG). The CIG conduct s the following types of pretreatment inspections:
• Industrial/Commercial Facilities (IND/COM)
• Permitted, Significant Industrial User (SIUs)
The following positions are responsible for implementing the pretreatment inspection programs:
• Environmental Compliance Inspector
• Laboratory/Field Technician
• Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector
• Regulatory Programs Division Manager
• Environmental Services Department Director
• City Attorney
1.0. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR
The Environmental Compliance Inspector (ECI) is responsible for inspecting assigned facilities, provide compliance information, and issue the appro priate level of enforcement action based on the type, severity, and history of violation observed using established guidelines. The ECIs are responsible for processing enforcement actions in a timely manner. The following are the ECI duties related to pretreatment inspections:
• Review inspection and compliance history
• Conduct inspection of assigned facility
• Educate Responsible Party (RP) on Best Management Practices (BMPs) • Document inspection findings
• Initiate appropriate enforcement action , such as Verbal Notice (VN), Warning Notice (WN), Notice of Violation (NOV), and Administrative Citation (AC)
• Review Administrative Citation Referrals (ACRs) with the Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector for potential AC
• Arrange and prepare for Compliance Meetings (CMs)
• Provide direction to RP for preparation of Compliance Schedules (CSs) and verify deadlines are being met • Conduct follow-up inspections and assess if compliance issues are adequately addressed • Issue AC and prepare for hearing, as needed
2.0. LABORATORY/FIELD TECHNICIAN
The Laboratory /Field Technician is responsible for sampling, including pH continuous monitoring, at industry compliance locations and surveillance monitoring in the sanitary sewer system. The enforcement responses carried out by the Laboratory/Field Technician are:
• Perform repeat sampling and analysis within 30 days after the City becomes aware of a violation.
Attachment 2
3.0. SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR
The Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector (SECI) has the responsibility to monitor the ECI duties. Following are the SECI duties related to pretreatment inspection programs:
• Provide oversight and guidance for all enforcement actions • Ensure consistency across the team in employing the level of enforcement • Ensure that remedial actions taken are consistent and timely • Ensure Inspection Staff are adequately trained on the ERP • Approve enforcement actions beyond verbal notices prepared by the ECI • Review ACR with ECI and approve AC
• Facilitate CM
• Refer violations to the City Attorney, District Attorney, or EPA, as needed • Revise ERP, as needed
4.0. REGULATORY PROGRAMS DIVISION MANAGER
The Regulatory Programs Division Manager has direct responsibility for the CIG. Following are the Regulatory Programs Division Manager’s duties related to pretreatment inspection programs:
• Approve and sign the ERP
• Aid and counsel CIG staff, as needed
• Review ACs, as needed
• Ensure CIG is adequately trained to perform duties
• Participate in Administrative Hearings and Appeals
5.0. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
The Environmental Services Department Director’s duties related to pretreatment inspection programs includes the following:
• Act as the Hearing Officer for Administrative Citation • Represent CIG to the City Council
6.0. CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney’s duties related to pretreatment inspection programs include the following:
• Provide guidance to the CIG on enforcement procedures with respect to SMC and ERP, as needed. • Manage civil and criminal litigation on behalf of the City.
Attachment 2
VI. IDENTIFYING AND INVESTIGATING INSTANCES OF
NONCOMPLIANCE
1.0. INDUSTRIAL USER INVENTORY
Each year an updated list of Industrial Users within the service area is compiled and submitted with the Pretreatment Program annual report . The list indicates whether Industrial Users are regulated by categorical standards or local limits, and includes the discharge status during the year. Throughout the year, the Industrial User inventory is continually updated as new Industrial Users are identified or they cease discharge to the sanitary sewer. Among the methods used to identify potential Industrial Users are:
• Review of building plans submitted to the City for construction permits , as ref erred by the Building Division;
• Inspection of commercial areas to identify new tenants and industries previously identified as zero discharge;
• Annual review of internet yellow pages;
• Referral by other City departments;
• Review Water Board list of industries subject to Stormwater General Industrial Permit; • Direct contact by business representatives; and
• Review of new business license list from the Finance Department.
These methods are employed annually and are particularly effective when all resources are utilized.
When potential dischargers to the sanitary sewer are identified, the business is contacted through a telephone call or inspection to determine the nature of its operations. Businesses that discharge a regulated wastestream are required to submit an industrial wastewater discharge permit application. A record of all businesses contacted is maintained in the files and database, regardless of whether the business is regulated by permit or Best Management Practices or does not discharge to the sanitary sewer.
2.0. INSPECTION PROGRAM
In accordance with 40 CFR Part 403.8(f)(2)(v), the Pretreatment Program performs a minimum of two compliance inspections per year for every SIU. Two general types of inspections are conducted: scheduled and demand, with additional inspections performed throughout the year as needed. More frequent inspections should be conducted when considering one or more of the following criteria:
• The Industrial User’s potential to adversely affect the POTW’s operations (e.g., the type and/or concentration of pollutants in the Industrial User’s discharge); • The volume and variability of the discharge;
• The type and reliability of control methods used to achieve compliance; • The quantity and nature of materials stored or in use and their relative risk of accidental spill; • POTW problems known or suspected to have been caused by the Industrial User; • A history of complaints, if any, at the facility;
• The Industrial User’s compliance history and
• The period of time since the last inspection.
Attachment 2
The Environmental Compliance Inspector prepares an annual monitoring and inspection plan that specifies the number of compliance inspections and monitoring events scheduled for each SIU. A description of the general types of inspections and the situation in which they would be applied follows:
2.1. Scheduled Inspections
• Annual Compliance Inspection – An inspection, based upon 40 CFR Part 403.8(f)(2)(v), in which Pretreatment Pr ogram staff performs a minimum of one compliance inspection for each permitted Industrial User per year. While the inspection is typically scheduled, it does not mean that inspectors must notify the facility prior to each inspection . Rather, a scheduled in spection may be more effective since arrangements can be made for accompanying personnel who are knowledgeable of the industry’s operations. This routine compliance inspection is conducted to examine the environmental activities of an Industrial User, ensure they comply with regulations relevant to their facility and to generate a permit or enforce an existing permit that identifies the responsibilities of the Industrial User. • Follow-Up Inspection – An inspection generally performed in order to obtain information unavailable during the routine compliance inspection or to determine compliance or progress toward a time schedule or corrective action. Scheduling a follow-up inspection may be necessary to involve personnel who have additional information or knowledge crucial to the operation of the facility . Like a routine compliance inspection, it is not required that an inspector notify the facility prior to the inspection. • Facility Modification Inspection – An inspection typically initiated by a request from a facility. Requests for an inspection from a facility may be due to modifications in their operation, including installation of new equipment, removal of equipment, relocation of processes, or closure of a facility . A facility may request an inspection to ensure they are compliant with their permit requirements.
2.2. Demand Inspections
• Enforcement Response Inspection – An inspection performed in response to an incident that is occurring or has occurred at a facility including spills, sewer line blockages, excursions, illegal dumping, or upset of pretreatment systems. This inspection may be initiated through a call from an industry representative, another environmental agency, public complaint, or violations discovered during routine sampling. • Preliminary Inspection – An unannounced inspection conducted at non-permitted (commercial) facilities where it is suspected that the facility may be performing an operation requiring a discharge permit .
Occasionally, through inspection of new and existing non- permitted facilities, operations are discovered that would require a discharge permit . It is the goal of the City of Sunnyvale to assess every business to characterize the business activity and its need for permitting or continued inspection.
3.0. MONITORING PROGRAM
The City of Sunnyvale generally performs all required compliance sampling in lieu of the SIU. In cases of continued noncompliance, the City may require the SIU to share the cost burden of demonstrating compliance by requiring increased monitoring to be conduct ed by an Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program certified laboratory, on behalf of the SIU.
Discharges from SIUs are generally monitored each quarter by composite sampling, grab sampling, and continuous pH monitoring where feasible. SIUs subject to Categorical Standards are monitored for all applicable pollutants in accordance with 40 CFR 136 procedures for sample collection, handling, and analysis . In general, composite Attachment 2
samples are collected to determine compliance with federal and local limits for metals and to measure revenue parameters. Grab samples are collected for pollutants where composite sampling is inappropriate such as oil and grease, cyanide, and volatile organics. Grab samples for metals may be taken in addition to composite sampling where deemed appropriate by the Environmental Compliance Inspector . pH recording is performed quarterly through grab or continuous chart recording if deemed appropriate. Monitoring is unannounced except in limited cases where security protocols prohibit access without prior clearance and escort . Wastewater samples are collected after process or pretreatment and prior to combining with sanitary or non-process flows.
Monitoring at frequencies greater than once per quarter is conducted at f acilities with demonst rated noncompliant discharge limits. Frequencies are determined by the Environmental Compliance Inspector, using the EPA Guidance Manual (Industrial User Guidance Manual), the Sunnyvale Pretreatment Program Guidance for Determining Monitoring Frequencies, and this Enforcement Response Plan. Monitoring frequencies are individually evaluated for each SIU and determined based on the need for representative sampling data to evaluate compliance and to meet minimum monitoring requirements.
Sampling events may be random and are unannounced. Since almost all sampling structures are located within the facility, the Environmental Compliance Inspector or Laboratory/Field Technician collecting the sample checks the final effluent pH, including any previous day’s pH data available for review, and the general functioning appearance of the pretreatment system. They will also verify compliance with permit conditions such as maintaining proper pH calibration records and performing required process control monitoring. Facility personnel are notified of any significant problems requiring immediate attention at the pre treatment system, unusual sample appearance, or any other problems observed in the surrounding area which may negatively impact spill control or storm or sanitary sewer discharges.
Chain of Custody documentation is maintained for all industrial samples. A Chain of Custody form is created prior to collection and is assigned a unique number to identify the sampling event. This number appears on all sample collection bottles and the Chain of Custody form. This number is used to identify results reported by the laboratory. Staff record pertinent information about the sampling event on the Chain of Custody form and maintain custody of all samples until they are relinquished to the laboratory. Samples are secured in an area of the laboratory that is accessible to authorized personnel only. Information regarding the sampling event, including test results, is stored in a computer tracking system. A hard copy version is stored in the Industry’s file.
Within 30 days of becoming aware of a sampling violation , the City will repeat the sampling and analysis unless the City notifies the IU of the violation and requires the IU to perform the repeat analysis. This sampling and analysis is required by 40 CFR 403.12(g)(2).
Attachment 2
VII. INDUSTRIAL USER REPORTING
General Pretreatment Regulations at 40 CFR 403.12 set forth five basic reporting requirements that apply to Industrial Users subject to specific categorical pretreatment standards. Categorical Industrial Users must comply with these Federal reporting requirements, even if the Control Authority has determined that the local limit(s) requirement is more stringent than the categorical standard. Pursuant to 40 CFR, these reporting require ments are:
• Baseline Monitoring Report (403.12(b)), including a compliance schedule, when necessary, for meeting categorical pretreatment standards (403.12(c)).
• Report on Progress in Meeting Compliance Schedules (403.12(c)) • Report on Compliance with Categorical Pretreatment Standard Deadline (403.12(d)). • Periodic Report on Continued Compliance (403.12(e)).
• Notice of Potential Problems, including Slug Loading (403.12(f)).
The Pretreatment Program requires all potential SIUs submit a Wastewater Discharge Permit Application (WDPA) prior to the commencement of discharge, which contains information listed in 40 CFR Part 403.12 (b)(1) -(5), and estimates of information requested in paragraphs (b)(4) and (5). As permissible by 40 CFR Part 403.12(g), because the Pretreatment Program conducts all minimally required sampling and analysis in lieu of the Industrial User, the Industrial User is not required to submit the compliance certification required under 40 CFR Part 403.12 (b)(6) and (d). Similarly, because the POTW itself collects all the sampling and analysis information required for the report , and that all other required information is included in the WDPA, new Industrial Users are not required to submit a separate BMR report in addition to the WDPA.
Attachment 2
VIII. Enforcement Procedures
When enforcement action is warranted, the appropriate response can usually be determined by referencing the Enforcement Response Guide ( Attachment A). A more or less severe enforcement action may be justified depending on the nature of the violation, abatement actions taken by the Industrial User, previous compliance history, and the effects of the violation on the POTW or receiving water.
1.0. TIMEFRAMES FOR ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE
The timelines of any enforcement action is important if escalated enforcement actions are necessary due to continued noncompliance. The Industrial User is notified of the violation in a timely manner to provide a better opportunity to identify potential causes of the violation before the circumstances surrounding the violation are lost. Finally, prompt notification with an expectation of an equally prompt response by the Industrial User demonstrates that the POTW is serious in addressing noncompliance and enforcing discharge regulations.
The timeframes listed below establish the maximum period in which enforcement actions are expected to be taken. It is desirable that any enforcement action be taken as soon as practical. • All violations will be identified and documented within five days of receiving compliance information. • Initial enforcement responses (informal and formal) will occur within 10 days of identifying a violation. • Follow-up actions for continuing or recurring violations will be taken with in 60 days of the initial enforcement response.
• Violations that threaten health, property, or environmental quality are considered emergencies and will receive immediate response such as halting the discharge or terminating service. • All violations meeting the criteria for significant noncompliance will be addressed through formal enforcement within 30 days of the identification of significant noncompliance. • Within 30 days of becoming aware of a sampling violation the City will repeat the sampling and analysis unless the City notifies the IU of the violation and requires the IU to perform the repeat analysis (40 CFR 403.12(g)(2)).
• Each year, all Significant Industrial Users in Significant Noncompliance (SNC) within the last twelve months will be reported in the local newspaper (40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(viii)).
Exception to Notification Procedure
An exception to the timely notification of violations by Industrial Users is when evidence indicates intentional behavior and possible criminal activity. Such instances include information received from an employee reporting illegal dumping or dumping detected during collection system monitoring. In any such cases, notification to the Industrial User is withheld as an investigation is conducted, and routine inspections and monitoring are suspended.
2.0. TYPES OF ENFORCEMENT ACTION
A range of enforcement response mechanisms are available . Enforcement responses may include informal responses such as a Verbal Notice, or a more formal, response such as a written Warning Notice or N otice of Violation, Administrative Order (with or without penalties), judicial action, and /or termination of service. The Attachment 2
appropriate enforcement action can be determined through the Enforcement Response Guide (ERG), found in Attachment A. The ERG reflects the following concepts:
• The Industrial User is notified when a violation is found. • If the Industrial User (or POTW) repeats the analysis for an effluent violation, and no further noncompliance is identified, no further response may be necessary. • For most violations, the POTW should receive an explanation and, as appropriate, a plan from the Industrial User to correct the violation within a specified time period. • If the violations persist or the explanation and the plan are not adequate, the POTW response should become more formal and commitments (or schedules, as appropriate) for compliance should be established in an enforceable document.
• The enforcement response selected should be related to the seriousness of the violation, and enforcement response should be escalated if compliance is not achieved expeditiously after the initial action. A serious initial violation requires a formal enforcement action.
By incorporating criteria for evaluating noncompliance and determining the appropriate enforcement action, the ERG provides a level of response appropriate to the violation. Additional criteria, which are not described i n the ERG, can be used to establish an appropriate enforcement action, which may be more or less stringent. These criteria are listed in Appendix A - Criteria for Evaluating Enforcement Response
1. 1 USEPA Guidance for Developing Control Authority Enforcement Response Plans (1989) Attachment 2
IX. TYPES OF VIOLATIONS
1.0. MINOR VIOLATION:
Minor violations include:
• Exceeding a discharge limit by 1.4 times or less for BOD, TSS, fats, oils and grease, or 1.2 times or less for all other pollutants except pH and toxic pollutants , or 1.4 times or less for conventional pollutants.
• pH that is less than 6 but is greater or equal to 5 for less than an hour. • pH that is more than 10.5 but less than or equal to 11.5 for less than an hour. • Submitting a required report, no more than 5 days late. • An isolated violation of a permit condition.
2.0. MODERATE VIOLATION:
Moderate violations include:
• Exceeding a discharge limit by 5 times or less for toxic and conventional pollutants. • pH less than or equal to 4 to but less than 5 for any duration. • pH that is greater than or equal to 11.5 but less than 12.5 for any duration. • Submitting a required report 6 or more days late but not more than 30 days late. • Recurring or uncorrected violations of a permit condition.
3.0. SEVERE VIOLATION:
Severe violations include:
• Exceeding a discharge limit by more than 5 times the limit for toxic and conventional pollutants.
• pH less than 4 or greater than 12.5 for any duration. • Submitting a required report more than 30 days late, and • Any violation meeting the definition of Significant Noncompliance.
Attachment 2
Figure 1: Enforcement Response
Attachment 2
X. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
The City follows a tiered approach for issuing enforcement actions to violations. Following are the enforcement tools available to pretreatment inspection programs:
• Distribution of Educational Materials
• Verbal Notice (VN)
• Warning Notice (WN)
• Notice of Violation (NOV) with Administrative Citation Referrals (ACRs) • Administrative Citation (AC)
See Enforcement Response in Figure 1 for a flow diagram related to the Enforcement process.
When considering the type of enforcement action to be taken, the Enforcement Response Guide (ERG) is used.
City staff gives the RP every reasonable opportunity to comply with directives issued to them. City staff acknowledges that education plays a vital role in environmental enforcement. The use of verbal education, outreach materials, and recommendations in coordination with more formal enforcement assists City staff in ensuring compliance.
All violations and corrective actions require follow-up by City staff to ensure appropriate compliance.
See Enforcement Response Guide in Attachment A for a schedule of enforcement actions.
1.0. DISTRIBUTION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS
The ECI gives the RP any relevant educational outreach materials that address the violation(s). The ECI verbally notifies the RP of future enforcement escalation should violations not be addressed. If the responsible party is not identified, educational materials are distributed to all identifiable dischargers at the site.
2.0. VERBAL NOTICE (VN)
A warning communicated to the Industrial User orally. A VN does not require a response from the Industrial User and may be given during an inspection or by phone call. The violation is usually very minor or within the range of analytical error for discharge violations.
A VN may require a written response from a facility. However, the ECI notifies the RP of future enforcement escalation should violations not be addressed.
See the Inspection Notice in Attachment B.
3.0. WARNING NOTICE (WN)
A WN is an official notice of noncompliance and is generally issued as an escalation from the VN . A WN is issued when a when a moderate violation has occurred or a violation that was issued a VN was not resolved within the compliance timeline. A WN may require a written response from a facility and directs the RP in writing to take immediate corrective action(s), within a compliance timeline.
Attachment 2
The ECI notifies the RP of future enforcement escalation if the violation(s) is not addressed. A WN is documented on the Inspection Notice and the applicable database(s). A WN may also be a separate written document sent to the facility.
4.0. NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV)
An official notice that a significant violation of discharge regulations has occurred and is accompanied by an Administrative Citation Referral (ACR). An NOV is generally issued as an escalation from the WN, for a severe actual violation. An NOV is issued when a violation is not resolved within the compliance timeline. An NOV may require a written response from the facility and it directs the RP in writing to take immediate corrective action(s).
The ECI notifies the RP of future enforcement escalation if the violation(s) is not addressed. An NOV is documented on the Inspection Notice or may be a separate written document sent to the facility and documented in applicable database(s).
An ACR gives the RP notice that the violation has been referred for an Administrative Citation. Multiple violations meriting ACR enforcement will be documented on the same notice.
5.0. ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION (AC)
The issuance of an AC indicates the increase in magnitude of the violation(s) beyond WN, while requiring immediate response from the RP to resolve/cease the violation(s). An AC is generally issued for severe violations, for unresolved repeat violations , or when previous enforcement fails to achieve compliance. An AC is delivered after an ACR has been issued with an NOV at the time of the inspection. Additional ACs may be issued to different RPs for the same violation (s) (e.g., the business owner and the property owner, the owner and the general contractor, or the general contractor and the subcontractor). An AC carries a monetary penalty and always requires approval from the SECI.
See the Administrative Citation in Attachment C.
6.0. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (AO)
Administrative Orders (AO) – E nforcement documents that direct Industrial Users to undertake or to cease specified activities by specified deadlines. The terms of an administrative order may or may not be negotiated with Industrial Users. Administrative orders may incorporate compliance schedules, administrative penalties, and termination of service orders. Administrative orders include:
• Finding of Noncompliance – A written notice instructing the Industrial User to identify and correct causes on noncompliance. The notice may require a response from the Industrial User identifying corrective actions taken.
• Consent Order – Documents noncompliance and includes actions required to be accomplished by specific dates (milestones). Consent Orders are developed during compliance meetings and terms are agreed upon by both parties.
• Compliance Order – Directs the Industrial User to achieve or restore compliance by a date specified in the order. A compliance order is often a stipulated agreement that may include a compliance schedule, the Attachment 2
payment of monetary penalties or cost recovery, and the imposition of fines when milestones are n ot met.
• Cease and Desist Order – D irects an Industrial User to cease illegal or unauthorized discharges immediately or to terminate its discharge altogether.
• Termination of Service or Permit revocation – A notification to an Industrial User of the intent t o revoke the Industrial User’s Permit or the termination of service.
7.0. COMPLIANCE MEETING (CM)
A CM is a meeting with the Industrial User to discuss the causes of noncompliance, corrective actions to achieve compliance, and the time frames for the implementation or corrective actions.
8.0. TIME COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
A Time Compliance Schedule is a timetable for the implementation of corrective actions (milestones) by an Industrial User to achieve consistent compliance with all pretreatment program requirements.
9.0. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
Any recipient of an AC may contest the violation by completing a “Request for Hearing Form” and returning it to the City, together with a deposit of the total fine amount, within 15 days from the date of the AC. The RP requesting the hearing shall be notified in writing of the time and place set for the hearing at least 10 calendar days prior to the date of the hearing. If the City staff submits an additional written report concerning the AC to the Hearing Officer (HO) for consideration at the hearing, then a copy of this report shall also be served to the person requesting the hearing no less than five calendar days prior to the date of the hearing.
The City Manager shall designate the HO for the AC hearing. A hearing before the HO shall be set for a date that is not less than 15 calendar days and not more than 60 calendar days from the date that the “Request for Hearing” is filed. The RP has one opportunity to reschedule the hearing and must do so promptly to save their opportunity for hearing. Failing to appear will result in the loss of the deposit and opportunity for hearing. At the hearing, the RP contesting the AC shall be given the opportunity to testify and to present evidence concerning the AC. The AC and any additional report submitted by the City staff shall constitute the primary evidence of the respective facts contained in those documents. The HO may continue the hearing and request additional information from Cit y staff or the recipient of the AC prior to issuing a written decision.
After considering all the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, the HO shall issue a written decision to uphold or cancel the AC and shall state in the decision the reasons for that decision. The decision of the HO shall be final. If the HO determines that the AC should be upheld, then the HO shall determine the amount of the fine to be imposed, and shall specify a date by which the fine is to be paid to the City. The RP shall be served with a copy of the written decision.
Any RP aggrieved by an administrative decision by the HO regarding the disposition of an AC may obtain review by filing a petition for review with the Municipal Court in accordance with the timelines and pro visions set forth in Government Code Section 53069.4.
Attachment 2
See Hearing Process - Administrative Citation in Figure 2 for a flow diagram of ECI and SECI responsibilities related to the Hearing process.
Attachment 2
Figure 2: Hearing Process
Attachment 2
XI. RECORDKEEPING
The City has electronic Inspection/Sampling Databases that maintain records to track compliance and appropriate follow-up enforcement responses for sites inspected.
In addition to the electronic database, hardcopy case files are maintained in an onsite filing system.
Attachment 2
APPENDIX A
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 2
ATTACHMENT A
Enforcement Response Guide
Attachment 2
Violation and/or Enforcement Response Not Listed
The Enforcement Response Guide contains recommended enforcement actions for most violations and is not meant to be a comprehensive list of every possible violation or enforcement action. Generally, instances of noncompliance are resolved by applying the enforcement response listed. Where compliance is not achieved using the enforcement response listed, further escalation of enforcement is appropriate.
Description of Terms
Term and abbreviations used in the guide are defined below. Specific enforcement responses that appear in this guide are described in more detail in the Enforcement Response Plan.
AC – Administrative Citation CA – City Attorney CDO – Cease and Desist CM – Compliance Meeting CS – Compliance Schedule CP – Civil Penalty IU – Industrial User NOV – Notice of Violation SNC – Significant Noncompliance TP - Termination of Permit TS - Termination of Service VN – Verbal Notice
Table 1: Unpermitted Discharge
Unpermitted Discharge
SMC Reference Nature of Violation Enforcement Response Admin Citation Discharge Permit
Required
12.12.160, .170, .180,
.220.
IU unaware of requirement; no
harm to POTW/environment
VN with application form;
2-week response
None
IU unaware of requirement; harm
to POTW/environment
NOV with CM Immediate
Response
$100
Failure to submit application within
10 days of due day
NOV with Immediate
Response
None
Continued failure to apply 45 days
after notice.
CDO with Possible Civil
Action
$500
IU aware of requirement; no harm
to POTW/environment
NOV with AC; Immediate
Response
$500
IU aware of requirement; harm to
POTW/environment
CDO with AC; Possible
Civil Action
$1,000
Attachment 2
Table 2: Effluent Limitations or General Discharge Prohibitions Effluent Limitations or General Discharge Prohibitions
SMC Reference Nature of Violation Enforcement Response Admin Citation Local or Federal
Discharge
Limitations
12.12.014, .020, .025,
.050, .120, .200
Isolated, minor violation VN; no response None
Isolated, moderate violation WN; 2-week response None
Severe violation NOV with CM immediate
response; CS; potential
AC or AP
$250
Recurring violation NOV with CM and CS 10-
day response; potential
AC or AP or CDO;
$500
Discharge causes damage to the
collection system or city property
or causes pass through or
interference at the wastewater
treatment plant or causes the
plant to violate its' NPDES Permit
discharge limits.
NOV with CM and CS 10-
day response; potential
AC or AP or CDO;
$1,000 or cost
recovery
Table 3: Notification
Notification
SMC Reference Nature of Violation Enforcement Response Admin Citation Notification of
Noncompliance
12.12.155, .300,
12.18.030
Failure to report a violation of a
permit effluent limitation
(includes 24-hr and 5-day
notifications).
NOV; 2-week response None
Failure to provide a written
response as required by an
enforcement action.
NOV with potential AC or
AP; immediate response
$200
Failure to report spill or violation
of permit condition.
NOV; 2-week response None
Failure to immediately report any
slug load, spill, or discharge that
could cause interference or pass-
through.
NOV with potential AC or
AP; immediate response
$250
Attachment 2
Table 4: Reporting
Reporting
SMC Reference Nature of Violation Enforcement Response Admin Citation Required Reports
12.12.190, .200,
.290,
12.12.150
Failure to submit any required
report (5 days or less)
WN; immediate
response
None
Failure to submit any required
report (more than 45 days)
NOV with AC or AP; SNC
status; immediate
response
$500
Failure to report changed
discharge, no impact
NOV; 2-week response None
Failure to report changed
discharge, impact present
NOV with AC or AP; SNC
status; immediate
response
$500
SMR is improperly certified WN for first occurrence;
NOV after notice
None
SMR is falsified in lieu of
compliance
NOV with AC or AP;
possible civil action
$500
Failure to submit SMR (5 days or
less)
VN; immediate response None
Failure to submit SMR (more than
5 days)
NOV; immediate
response
None
Failure to submit SMR (more than
45 days)
NOV with AC or AP; SNC
status; immediate
response
$500
Attachment 2
Table 5: Monitoring
Monitoring
SMC Reference Nature of Violation Enforcement Response Admin Citation Improper Sampling
and Analysis
12.12.200, .240, .254
Failure to conduct self-monitoring
as required in permit.
NOV; NOV with AC or AP
after notice
$200
Failure to monitor for all
pollutants required by permit
WN; NOV after notice;
NOV with AC or AP if not
corrected.
$200
Improper sampling location or
improper sampling and analytical
methods
WN; NOV after notice;
NOV with AC if not
corrected.
$200
Table 6: Pollution Prevention
Pollution Prevention
SMC Reference Nature of Violation Enforcement Response Admin Citation Best Management
Practices (BMPs)
12.12.278
Failure to implement required
Best Management Practices
WN; NOV after notice;
NOV with AC or AP if not
corrected.
$200
Pretreatment
Facilities and
Monitoring
Equipment
12.12.012, .026, .030,
.200, .250
Failure to maintain required
pretreatment equipment
NOV; NOV with AC or AP
after notice
$250
Failure to install required
pretreatment equipment
NOV if less than 30 days
late; NOV with AP if
more than 30 days; CM
and CDO if not corrected.
$500
Failure to maintain monitoring
equipment
NOV; NOV with AC or AP
after notice
$250
Failure to install monitoring
equipment
NOV if less than 30 days
late; NOV with AC or AP
if more than 30 days; CM
and CDO if not corrected.
$500
Failure to meet within 90 days
after the schedule date, a
compliance milestone in the
permit or enforcement order for
starting construction, completing
construction, or attaining final
compliance
NOV with AC or AP, SNC
status
$500
Attachment 2
Table 7: Significance of pH Violations
Significance of pH Violations
Type of Violation Low pH High pH Duration
Minor Violation 5.0 ≤ x < 6.0 10.5 < x ≤ 11.5 Less than 1 hour Moderate Violation
5.0 ≤ x < 6.0 10.5 < x ≤ 11.5 More than 1 hour
4.0 ≤ x < 5.0 11.5 < x < 12.5 Less than 1 hour
Severe Violation < 4.0 ≥ 12.5 Any duration
Attachment 2
ATTACHMENT B
Inspection Notice
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
ATTACHMENT C
Administrative Citation
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
www.hydroscience.com
APPENDIX 8A
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan
City of Sunnyvale Wastewater Collection System Model
Expansion and Capacity Analysis
Attachment 2
www.hydroscience.com
City of Sunnyvale Wastewater Collection System Model Expansion and Capacity Analysis , December 2022:
https://www.sunnyvale.ca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/5678
Attachment 2
www.hydroscience.com
APPENDIX 8B
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan
City of Sunnyvale FY 2023/24 Budget and Resource Allocation Plan - Wastewater
Attachment 2
Wastewater
Attachment 2
This Page Intentionally Blank
Attachment 2
Wastewater
Sunnyvale provides wastewater management services as a municipal utility.
Wastewater collection and treatment is one of the core services the City provides to Sunnyvale residents and businesses. The City ’s Wastewater Fund Long- Term Financial Plan includes sewage collection and treatment, environmental protection, regulatory compliance, and maintenance of the City ’s aging collection and treatment systems.
Major Wastewater Projects
Wastewater Collection Systems. In general, the collection system projects related to wastewater management address critical and immediate needs. Projects address manholes, sewer pipes, and rebuilding sewer lift stations. The largest of these efforts is the replacement of sewer mains with funding totaling $37 million over the next twenty years. The proposed budget also allocates an additional $6.5 million to perform emergency repair and replacement work.
Peery Park Wastewater Capacity Projects. The budget includes capacity increa
se projects to accommodate increasing sewage flow from Peery Park development. The estimated budget is $21 million with design commencing in FY 2024/25 and construction completed in FY 2027/28.
Sewer Capacity Enhancement Projects. Several sewer capacity projects were recommended in a consultant modeling study completed in 2022. Sewer projects along Mary Ave, California Ave, and upgrading the sewer pump station on Arques Ave are scheduled to start design in FY 2026/27 with construction completed in 2034/35 at an estimated cost of $14.9 million. Construction is scheduled to be phased over seven years.
Water Pollution Control Plant Biosolids Processing. This project addres
ses the removal, processing, and disposal of accumulated sediment from the Plant’s Oxidation Ponds, as well as digester cleaning. These services will be necessary until a permanent thickening and dewatering building can be constructed as part of the Cleanwater Program.
Water Pollution Control Plant Permanent Chemical Storage Structure.
This project consists of the construction of a new permanent chemical storage tank facility. About six months ago, temporary chemical tanks were installed to test the effectiveness of multiple chemical regimes to mitigate the pond algae.
The new chemical regimes have proven to be effective, however, a permanent tank storage facility is needed to store the chemicals. This includes a permanent concrete pad, one chemical storage tank and dosing station. The current temporary chemical storage tanks have an engineered useful life of about 2 years in the current construction.
City of Sunnyvale FY 2024/25 Budget and Resource Allocation Plan Attachment 2
This Page Intentionally Blank
Attachment 2
Wastewater Funded Projects
Project Prior
Actual
Current
2022-23
Plan
2023-24
Plan
2024-25
Plan
2025-26
Plan
2026-27
Plan
2027-28
Plan
2028-29
Plan
2029-30
Plan
2030-31
Plan
2031-32
Plan
2032-33
Y11-Y20
Total
Project
Life
Total
805253 - Sewer Emergency Repair and
Replacement
1,615,169 670,924 895,739 926,918 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 2,259,369 8,168,120 822762 - Storm Pump Station Number 2
Rehabilitation
4,431,804 148,738 12,876 - - - - - - - - - - 4,593,418
824341 - Wastewater Cost of Service
Study
90,149 56,007 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 - - - 100,000 346,156 825331 -
Replacement/Repair/Rehabilitation of
Sanitary Sewer System
11,896,226 5,772,638 - 539,280 - 3,163,298 569,394 - 3,558,279 640,490 - 4,002,580 18,731,772 48,873,958 825362 -
Replacement/Repair/Rehabilitation of
Storm Drain
137,861 1,205,456 - 184,468 1,137,820 - - - 213,849 776,757 - - 3,061,536 6,717,747 825521 - WPCP Biosolids Processing 14,976,656 1,979,488 1,925,000 2,000,000 2,080,000 2,165,000 2,250,000 - - - - - - 27,376,144 825962 - SCVURPPP Contracting and
Fiscal Agent - General Fund
99,611 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 550,000 1,254,611 827040 - WPCP Asset Condition
Assessment
- - - - - - - - - 367,107 - - - 367,107
828210 - Inspection Data Mgmt and
Handheld Data Entry Device Project
- 250,000 - - - - - - - - 250,000 - 250,000 750,000
829070 - Lawrence Expressway Sanitary
Sewer Rehabilitation
4,817,577 30,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 4,847,577
829100 - Sanitary Sewer Siphon Cleaning
and Assessment
279,355 690,473 - - - - - - - 1,090,850 - - 1,201,507 3,262,185 830200 - Repairs to the Secondary
Process
744,809 100,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 844,809
830210 - Repairs to the Power
Generation Facility
1,220,776 829,224 450,000 450,000 265,000 265,000 265,000 - - - - - - 3,745,000 830220 - Repairs to the Tertiary Process 1,073,459 809,709 121,079 639,224 - - - - - - - - - 2,643,471 830260 - Sanitary Sewer Salinity
Reduction Study
466 113,646 - - - - - - - - - - - 114,112
831390 - CFD No.3 - Ten Year
Infrastructure Improvements Plan
- 44,941 37,856 - - - - - - - - - 104,381 187,178
831620 - Repairs to the WPCP Support
Facilities
392,833 100,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 - - - - - - - - 942,833 831630 - Repairs to Solids/Dewatering
Facilities
147,572 325,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 472,572
831680 - Adjust Sewer Utilities In Support
of Paving Projects
125,160 274,063 113,948 107,897 105,327 109,541 113,922 118,479 123,218 128,147 133,273 138,604 1,728,677 3,320,255 831730 - WPCP Oxidation Pond Levee
Rehabilitation
1,001,959 6,468,880 478,555 3,030,447 1,907,914 1,123,233 1,035,601 1,037,025 1,038,505 1,040,046 149,932 43,313 950,446 19,305,857 832430 - Recycled and Potable Water
Plan Development
3,835 146,165 - - - - - - - - - - - 150,000
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
FUNDED / UNFUNDED PROJECTS
BUDGETED PROJECT COSTS SUMMARY
Attachment 2
Wastewater Funded Projects
Project Prior
Actual
Current
2022-23
Plan
2023-24
Plan
2024-25
Plan
2025-26
Plan
2026-27
Plan
2027-28
Plan
2028-29
Plan
2029-30
Plan
2030-31
Plan
2031-32
Plan
2032-33
Y11-Y20
Total
Project
Life
Total
833050 - Wastewater Master Plan Update - - - - - - - - 1,710,792 - - - - 1,710,792 833060 - WPCP Annual Digester
Cleaning
352,690 198,738 207,365 208,704 - 209,899 - 213,995 - 218,170 - 222,427 1,653,938 3,485,926 833070 - WPCP Electronic Operations
and Maintenance Manual
170,564 343,516 - - - - - - - - - - - 514,080
833090 - Sanitary System Hydraulic
Model Update
759,787 - 50,000 50,000 - - - - - - - - - 859,787
833091 - Storm System Hydraulic Model
Update - General Fund
- - - - - - - - 279,541 - - - - 279,541
834460 - Sewer Capacity Enhancement
Projects
- 1,000,000 - - 970,000 - 3,850,000 940,000 - 3,760,000 1,080,000 - 4,290,000 15,890,000 834720 - Laboratory Certification Update 23,621 76,379 64,862 66,808 68,812 - - - - - - - - 300,482 834750 - Peery Park Specific Plan
Wastewater Capacity Improvements
- 1,069,668 - 1,069,668 - 5,320,744 4,595,316 - - - - - - 12,055,396 835480 - Baykeeper Litigation Expenses 386,629 363,371 - - - - - - - - - - - 750,000 835991 - Cupertino Sanitary District
Sewer Flow Diversion
- 115,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 115,000
836230 - Sewer System Management
Plan
- - - 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 - - 200,000 400,000
836380 - WPCP Digester No. 3
Improvement Project
- - 2,025,000 225,000 - - - - - - - - - 2,250,000
836390 - WPCP Chemical Tank Storage
Facility
- - 100,000 430,000 - - - - - - - - - 530,000
836440 - Abandonment of Rancho
Rinconada Sewer Line Segment
- 25,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 25,000
Total Wastewater Funded Projects 44,748,570 23,262,022 6,687,282 10,183,414 7,064,874 12,636,715 12,959,233 2,589,499 7,254,185 8,401,567 1,893,204 4,686,924 35,081,626 177,449,116
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
FUNDED / UNFUNDED PROJECTS
BUDGETED PROJECT COSTS SUMMARY
Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 2,254,321 - -
2023-24 895,739 - -
2024-25 926,918 -
2025-26 225,000 - -
2026-27 225,000 - -
2027-28 225,000 - -
2028-29 225,000 - -
2029-30 225,000 - -
2030-31 225,000 - -
2031-32 225,000 - -
2032-33 225,000 - -
2033-34 225,000 - -
2034-35 217,651 - -
2035-36 217,357 - -
2036-37 217,052 - -
2037-38 216,733 - -
2038-39 216,403 - -
2039-40 223,521 - -
2040-41 232,462 - -
2041-42 241,760 - -
2042-43 251,430 - -
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total 4,986,288 - -
Grand Total 8,136,348 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
City staff routinely reviews CCTV inspection reports to identify defects and prioritize repairs for the sewer system. The purpose of this project is to provide sufficient funding for emergency repairs of high-risk defects, particularly those that are highly severe or located close to critical waterways and facilities. These repairs must be addressed promptly due to the potential consequences of inaction, such as pipe collapses, service disruptions, sewage spills, regulatory violations, and legal liabilities, which could result in costly clean-up and repair efforts.
Due to the backlog of high-risk defects, which stands at about 500 pipes awaiting review and prioritization, plus the addition of even more high-risk defects from future CCTV inspections, the City has a pressing need to allocate additional resources towards repairs. The average cost per defect is about $15,000 (could be up to $50,000 depending on scope and complexity); the City has already completed over 40 such repairs in the current fiscal year, almost draining the available budget. To address the mounting backlog and ensure the ongoing safety of the sewer system, staff is proposing to increase the project budget to $900,000 for the next two fiscal years. After the completion of the most pressing repairs, the budget for this project can return to $225,000 per year.
This project is different from other sewer main replacement projects because its focus is to address emergency spot repairs instead of replacing the entire pipe, which are usually planned and executed through large contracts. This project is aimed to provide immediate funding for emergency work that requires swift action to maintain the reliable functioning of the sewer system.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The alternative is not to fund this project and delay the needed repairs until funds are requested and approved by Council on a case by case basis. These repairs are of an urgent nature most of the time, and delay could result in adverse effects for public health and the environment should overflows occur. The City could also be subject to penalties and fines from regulatory agencies should sewage discharges occur as result of deferring an emergency repair. Delaying can also result in higher repair costs.
Fiscal Impact
Repairs typically range from $15,000 for a spot repair to over $100,000 for sewer repairs on a major thoroughfare. The requested increase in annual budget over the next two years will provide the necessary funds for emergency repairs.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System EM - Environmental Management - EM-5: Minimal Pollution and Quantity of Wastewater 805253 - Sewer Emergency Repair and Replacement
Originating Year: 2000 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Winola Cheong Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 4,431,804 6,934 -
2022-23 148,738 6,947 -
2023-24 12,876 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 12,876 - -
Grand Total 4,593,418 13,880 -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project provides funds for the rehabilitation of Storm Pump Station #2, east of Baylands Park. Sunnyvale operates two storm pump stations to pump accumulated storm water into tributaries to the San Francisco Bay. These are required due to areas of the City that are close to sea level and could suffer flooding, particularly during large storms and exceptionally high tides. The current configuration of Storm Pump Station #2 consists of a structure with six pumps (one small electric and five natural gas- powered engines), a storage pond surrounded by a levee, and an access road to get to the facility. Several capital aspects of the facility must be periodically funded.
This station was built in 1962. The pumps and motors are original and need to be replaced. The redesign includes replacing the existing natural gas engines with more efficient electrical submersible pumps with an onsite generator for an emergency back-up power source. Several upgrades are also included for code and regulatory compliance as well as operational efficiency including:
rehabilitation or replacement of discharge piping; installation of trash capture devices; upgrading electrical control panels and accessories to current standards; replacing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) controls, which includes the installation of a flow meter; inlet and wet well improvements; and addressing other pump station rehabilitation items identified in the feasibility study.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project is necessary to maintain existing essential infrastructure of the Wastewater Utility. Failure of this station to operate would result in flooding of the northeast portion of Sunnyvale.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the General Fund
Funding Sources
General Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 822762 - Storm Pump Station Number 2 Rehabilitation
Originating Year: 2002 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2023/24 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Nathan Scribner Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 90,149 12,500 -
2022-23 56,007 - -
2023-24 50,000 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 50,000 - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 50,000 - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 50,000 - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 200,000 - -
Grand Total 346,156 12,500 -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
Every five years, the Utility Billing Division in the Department of Finance performs a cost of service study of the wastewater system to update and align the City's wastewater rates with the costs associated with providing service. Staff works with a consultant to develop a cost of service model and populate the model with current data. The study generates a cost of service for each customer class and recommends adjustments to the City's rates and rate structure to ensure costs are recovered on an equitable basis from the different customer classes.
The most recent analysis was done in FY 2017/18. This project provides funding to hire a consultant that will support staff's effort to refresh the analysis every five years.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
City policy and state law require that the rates be periodically restructured in a way that equitably allocates program costs among rate payers (Council Policy 7.1.B.1.4). An alternative to using a consultant would be for staff to conduct the cost of service study.
However, city resources and staff hours are not available for a project of this magnitude. If the project is not completed, it is possible that rates will not reflect actual costs, will not provide the complete cost-recovery needed to provide wastewater services, and costs may not be equitably allocated per city policy.
Fiscal Impact
The studies completed through this project will ensure utility rates are consistent with the true cost of providing the utility service and provide enough revenue to operate the utility. This is a requirement of Proposition 218, and the results of the analysis will be used to determine utility rates for each customer class. The next study is being delayed until FY 2024/25 so that the study can reflect the WPCP Master Plan updates currently in progress.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 824341 - Wastewater Cost of Service Study
Originating Year: 2003 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 170 - Finance Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Special Project Manager: Stephen Napier Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 11,896,226 - -
2022-23 5,772,638 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 539,280 - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 3,163,298 - -
2027-28 569,394 - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 3,558,279 - -
2030-31 640,490 - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 4,002,580 - -
2033-34 720,464 - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 4,502,358 - -
2036-37 810,424 - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 5,064,541 - -
2039-40 911,618 - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 5,696,920 - -
2042-43 1,025,446 - -
20 Year Total 31,205,094 - -
Grand Total 48,873,958 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project is for repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of sewer pipes and associated appurtenances, including but not limited to, manholes, lateral piping, and surface restoration. The goal of this project is to reduce sanitary sewer overflows as well as reduce inflow and infiltration which results in higher treatment costs. Alternative technologies are evaluated to select the best, most cost-effective rehabilitation method for each location. These methods include traditional open-trench replacement as well as "trenchless" methods including pipe-bursting/replacement, or Cured-in-Place pipe lining.
The City has over 310 miles of sewer lines, ranging from 6 inches to 48 inches in diameter, and valued at over $330 million.
Many of the sewer lines are over 50 years old and have reached the end of their useful life. Pipe failures have been increasing.
Recent video inspection has revealed significant deficiencies at multiple locations that require rehabilitation to prevent failure.
Specific projects will be identified based on need from CCTV findings and as identified in the Wastewater Master Plan. The projects will be constructed in a three-year cycle, with the first two years for planning and design and the third year for construction. Projects will be built to fall within allocated budget, therefore linear footage of pipelines to be replaced/repaired/rehabilitated will vary.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project is necessary to comply with regulatory standards which require agencies to rehabilitate and/or replace sanitary sewer system piping and associated components. The alternative to replacement of sewer pipes in poor condition would be to repair them segment by segment on an emergency basis. Public health and the environment could be threatened, and fines could be levied against the City, should overflows occur as a result of a structural failure. Further, repairing or replacing segments of pipeline on an emergency basis would be significantly costlier than scheduled replacements.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues. The projects will be constructed in a three-year cycle, with the first two years for design including permitting and the third year for construction. Projects will be built to fall within allocated budget, therefore linear footage of pipelines to be replaced/repaired/rehabilitated will vary.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 825331 - Replacement/Repair/Rehabilitation of Sanitary Sewer System Originating Year: 2006 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Bennett Chun Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 137,861 - -
2022-23 1,205,456 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 184,468 - -
2025-26 1,137,820 - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 213,849 - -
2030-31 776,757 - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 247,910 - -
2035-36 1,191,618 - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 287,395 - -
2040-41 1,334,612 - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 5,374,430 - -
Grand Total 6,717,747 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project is for the repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of storm drain pipes. The City has over 320 miles of storm lines, from 6 inches to 84 inches in diameter. Many of the lines are 50 or more years old. This project repairs, replaces, or rehabilitates storm mains as they are identified or as identified in the Wastewater Master Plan CIP list. Alternative technologies are investigated to apply the best method for each location, including open-trench replacement, "trenchless" pipe- bursting/replacement, or pipe-lining. Storm systems are not generally subjected to the same conditions as sewer systems, and can typically be expected to last longer.
The project additionally provides for repair, replacement, or rehabilitation of associated storm water conveyance components that could include manholes, catch basins, drain inlet grates and lids, and other related system components. Design of the Remington Court storm drain outfall into Stevens Creek was completed in 2021, with construction of the outfall repairs completed in December 2022. Funding includes a study to evaluate sources of storm water inflow into the sanitary sewer system. The study will list and prioritize these locations and propose corrections for future capital improvement projects. The Sources of Storm Water Inflow into Sanitary System Study 2021 9UW-21-01 is currently being finalized.
This project also may include condition assessment; cleaning and debris removal to conduct condition assessment; and flow monitoring as needed to diagnose system structural and performance issues. Specific task identification relies upon condition assessment methods, most commonly the findings of video inspection, to identify locations in need of replacement or rehabilitation each year. This project is necessary to assure storm water conveyance and mitigate system failures which can result in flooding.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The other alternatives to the project are either not to fund it or to delay funding to later years. However, if funding is not provided or delayed for too long, structural failures in the system due to aging pipes might develop that could cause flooding and property damage. Emergency repairs would then be necessary, which are usually more expensive than scheduled replacements.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the General Fund.
Funding Sources
General Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-9: Adequate Storm Drain System 825362 - Replacement/Repair/Rehabilitation of Storm Drain Originating Year: 2019 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Richard Chen Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 14,976,656 - -
2022-23 1,979,488 - -
2023-24 1,925,000 -
2024-25 2,000,000 - -
2025-26 2,080,000 - -
2026-27 2,165,000 - -
2027-28 2,250,000 - -
2028-29 - - 280,000
2029-30 - - 280,000
2030-31 - - 280,000
2031-32 - - 280,000
2032-33 - - 280,000
2033-34 - - 280,000
2034-35 - - 280,000
2035-36 - - 280,000
2036-37 - - 280,000
2037-38 - - 280,000
2038-39 - - 280,000
2039-40 - - 280,000
2040-41 - - 280,000
2041-42 - - 280,000
2042-43 - - 280,000
20 Year Total 10,420,000 - 4,200,000
Grand Total 27,376,144 - 4,200,000
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) Biosolids Processing project was initiated in 2009 to address the accumulation of biosolids (sediments) on the bottom of the WPCP Secondary Treatment Oxidation Ponds. This project provides funding for the removal, processing, and disposal of accumulated sediments from the Plant's Oxidation Ponds.
The WPCP Biosolids Processing project also provides funding for the dewatering and beneficial reuse of anaerobically digested biosolids from the Plant's solids handling process until new solids dewatering facilities are constructed as part of the ongoing Sunnyvale Cleanwater Program.
The Biosolids Handling scope of work provides for the removal of ponds solids by dredging and preconditioning before sending those biosolids to a centrifuge for dewatering. The WPCP Biosolids Processing project also provides funding for the dewatering and disposal of biosolids generated by the WPCP Anaerobic Digesters. After dewatering, those concentrated solids are hauled off-site for land application (beneficial reuse).
Funding can also be used to clean digesters when the same contractor provides one or both of the previously mentioned services (pond and/or digester solids processing). This is a cost and logistical advantage for the City as much of the same equipment is used in the cleaning process.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The WPCP is a heavily regulated wastewater treatment facility with strict effluent discharge requirements. The ammonia concentration in the WPCP final effluent is one of the plant effluent limits. Reduced volumetric treatment capacity within the Oxidation Ponds due to solids accumulation can directly affect the ammonia removal ability of the ponds and, if not addressed, may increase the concentration of ammonia in the effluent.
Over the last decade, the WPCP held several technical meetings with scientists and engineers to determine the best course of action to minimize the chance of process failure of the Secondary Oxidation Ponds. During those meetings, it was concluded that dredging the ponds at a rate faster than accumulation is the most prudent approach.
The rate of capacity restoration of the ponds is slow and needs to be spread over several years. The anaerobic digestion of wastewater solids provides fuel for power generation and volumetric reductions of plant-generated solids. Both save operating costs associated with purchasing power, handling, and disposal of plant-generated biosolids.
Fiscal Impact
The project costs are reflected in the agreement with the current contractor providing the handling, processing, and disposal services. $280,000 in operating impacts have been added to cover the ongoing hauling and disposal costs related to biosolids dewatering and disposal after 2027, once a new Thickening and Dewatering Building has been constructed.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 825521 - WPCP Biosolids Processing
Originating Year: 2006 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2027/28 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Bryan Berdeen Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 99,611 100,000 -
2022-23 55,000 160,000 -
2023-24 55,000 55,000 -
2024-25 55,000 55,000 -
2025-26 55,000 55,000 -
2026-27 55,000 55,000 -
2027-28 55,000 55,000 -
2028-29 55,000 55,000 -
2029-30 55,000 55,000 -
2030-31 55,000 55,000 -
2031-32 55,000 55,000 -
2032-33 55,000 55,000 -
2033-34 55,000 55,000 -
2034-35 55,000 55,000 -
2035-36 55,000 55,000 -
2036-37 55,000 55,000 -
2037-38 55,000 55,000 -
2038-39 55,000 55,000 -
2039-40 55,000 55,000 -
2040-41 55,000 55,000 -
2041-42 55,000 55,000 -
2042-43 55,000 55,000 -
20 Year Total 1,100,000 1,100,000 -
Grand Total 1,254,611 1,360,000 -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The City of Sunnyvale is one of 15 members of the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP). SCVURPPP was formed to implement the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) issued to the cities, county, and Valley Water who discharge storm water to the San Francisco Bay. These 15 agencies have signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and pay annual assessments to cover the cost of programmatic activities related to implementing the NPDES Permit.
The MOA provides for the selection of one of the members as the program's Contracting and Fiscal Agent. The Contracting and Fiscal Agent provides audited financial statements, billing, and payment services for SCVURPPP. It also acts as the awarding authority for any contracts that the agency is required to enter into.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The City of Sunnyvale is providing billing and payment services for SCVURPPP and acting as the awarding authority for any contracts that the agency is required to enter into during the course of its normal operations under the MOA.
Fiscal Impact
Total costs of the project are covered by assessments to the SCVURPPP members. The City of Sunnyvale's assessment under the MOA is 7.25% of the total annual program budget.
Funding Sources
Revenue from this project goes to the General Fund. This project monitors Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program reimbursement of reasonable and customary costs, pursuant to the SCVURPPP MOA.
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-8: Protection of Creeks and Bay 825962 - SCVURPPP Contracting and Fiscal Agent - General Fund Originating Year: 2019 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 170 - Finance Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Special Project Manager: Stephen Napier Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 - - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 367,107 - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 367,107 - -
Grand Total 367,107 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project will provide for the multi-disciplinary (structural, civil, electrical, corrosion) engineering review of the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) on a periodic basis. As part of long-range infrastructure planning for the WPCP, a periodic condition assessment of plant facilities is needed in order to prioritize repair/replacement projects and provide for a systematic approach to capital budget planning. The next assessment is scheduled for FY 2030/31, which is five years after the anticipated completion of the first phase of the new Water Pollution Control Plant.
The information will be used to define existing conditions and priorities as part of the ongoing predictive maintenance efforts.
Funds should be allocated at five year intervals to maintain this level of evaluation. An assessment should be completed periodically to track the condition and deterioration of assets so that repair/replacement projects can be timed appropriately, and the various needs can be prioritized. This data will then be input into the plant’s asset database for evaluation and comparison to be used in managing the WPCP infrastructure. The schedule and cost for these assessments will be reevaluated at the completion of the Master Plan.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Periodic assessment and comparison of actual condition of WPCP assets with agreed-upon service levels and predicted useful lives facilitates determination of least life-cycle costs for these assets. This information can then be used to provide for capital planning, to minimize the effect on sewer rates.
Fiscal Impact
Project may be incorporated into Cleanwater Program. Actual need will depend on Cleanwater Program availability. This project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 827040 - WPCP Asset Condition Assessment
Originating Year: 2008 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2030/31 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 250,000 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - 15,000
2025-26 - - 15,450
2026-27 - - 15,914
2027-28 - - 16,391
2028-29 - - 16,883
2029-30 - - 17,389
2030-31 - - 17,911
2031-32 250,000 - 18,448
2032-33 - - 19,002
2033-34 - - 19,572
2034-35 - - 20,159
2035-36 - - 20,764
2036-37 - - 21,386
2037-38 - - 22,028
2038-39 - - 22,689
2039-40 250,000 - 23,370
2040-41 - - 24,071
2041-42 - - 24,793
2042-43 - - 25,537
20 Year Total 500,000 - 376,753
Grand Total 750,000 - 376,753
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project is to update the data system used by, and to provide handheld data entry devices to, the Environmental Service Department’s Environmental Compliance Inspectors and Lab/Field Technicians in the Regulatory Programs Division. This project will aim to integrate (or replace) the various databases currently used to manage inspection data, and enable inspection and sampling activities by inspectors to be recorded on a hand-held data entry device and uploaded to a database for further tracking, trend analysis, regulatory reporting, work scheduling, and enforcement actions. It will achieve greater efficiencies by making inspection data more readily available, reducing the possibility of human error in transcribing paper inspection reports to a database, minimizing the possibility of lost or misplaced paper files, and reducing the time needed to gather and store inspection data. Current methods are error-prone, slow, and consume staff time that could be better used for other critical tasks.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Other water quality inspection programs in Bay Area cities already use such equipment and databases to handle their work.
Newer and expanded requirements for various inspection types and business types, such as stormwater treatment features in new and redevelopment; trash reduction ; mercury management practices at dental practices; as well as long established commercial, and significant industrial user programs, have led to a growing inventory of businesses inspected with dynamic needs for reporting to regulatory agencies. This project will help the program keep pace with the increased needs.
Fiscal Impact
Operating costs are for software licensing and equipment replacement. These costs were derived from expenditures for a different hand-held data device project for Maintenance and Operations staff. Replacement is estimated at eight-year intervals but will be evaluated and updated when appropriate hardware/software platforms have been identified.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-8: Protection of Creeks and Bay EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 828210 - Inspection Data Mgmt and Handheld Data Entry Device Project Originating Year: 2010 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Capital Project Manager: Melody Tovar Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 4,817,577 - -
2022-23 30,000 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 4,847,577 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The Lawrence Expressway Sanitary Sewer trunk main (main) is a critical pipe for carrying sewage from the southern and eastern portions of the City and the Rancho Rinconada area of Cupertino to the Water Pollution Control Plant. The main, which was originally installed in 1963, has been impacted by corrosive sewer gases over the years and has reached the end of its useful life expectancy of 50 years.
A condition assessment and preliminary design report for the main was completed in 2016 which identified several defects, access issues, areas requiring heavy cleaning, and degraded portions of the sewer trunk main pipeline. Bids for construction of an Initial Project to address these immediate needs were received in late 2020. In addition, the 2015 Wastewater Master Plan indicates that a capacity increase is needed along this alignment, or along an adjacent corridor. An analysis to determine the preferred alternative is underway and a new project to fund the capacity improvements will be proposed once conceptual costs are known. If a capacity increase along Lawrence Expressway is preferred, this increase will likely involve installation of a parallel sewer rather than upsizing the existing sewer. For this reason, rehabilitation of the existing sewer is warranted.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Not funding this project could result in a complete failure of the Lawrence Sanitary Sewer Trunk Main piping system. Due to the high volume of sewage that the line conveys, a failure of this magnitude could be an environmental disaster and the Lawrence Expressway roadway could potentially develop a sinkhole if the City takes no action.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System EM - Environmental Management - EM-5: Minimal Pollution and Quantity of Wastewater 829070 - Lawrence Expressway Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Originating Year: 2012 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2022/23 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Bennett Chun Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 279,355 - -
2022-23 690,473 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 1,090,850 - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 1,201,507 - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 2,292,357 - -
Grand Total 3,262,185 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The City’s sanitary sewer system includes 13 locations with inverted siphons, which are pipes that dip under obstructions such as roadways and creeks. Over time, these low points accumulate sediment and grease and must occasionally be removed. In 2019, this project funded cleaning and inspection of some of the siphons. In early 2023, the City advertised a construction contract to clean and inspect the siphons that still need work. This project will fund this effort, and will allow for periodic cleaning and inspection in future years.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Siphons must be cleaned and inspected to ensure proper function, and to prevent blockages due to sediment, grease, and potential damage of existing pipes. Such blockages may result in sewer overflows in nearby roadways or creeks, which may trigger regulatory fines.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Wastewater Management Fund.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 829100 - Sanitary Sewer Siphon Cleaning and Assessment
Originating Year: 2012 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Capital Project Manager: Eric Evans Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 744,809 - -
2022-23 100,000 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 844,809 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project funds the maintenance and rehabilitation of the current secondary treatment equipment at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) pending the construction of new secondary treatment facilities in ten to twelve years.
Rehabilitation may include: incorporation of chemical dosing facilities; upgrades to the existing polymer feed system, pump overhauls, and replacements. Cost estimates for these elements are based on vendor quotes, benchmarks with other agencies, and preliminary estimates from engineering consultants. Specification development and implementation planning will require additional engineering efforts which will form the first phase of this project.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Project implementation is phased over several years to allow for continued operation of the WPCP and sequencing of the processes and equipment to ensure adequate processing capacity for the incoming wastewater. Polymer system upgrades started in FY 2019/20 and will continue into FY 2023/24. This schedule may change due to WPCP conditions and evaluation results.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 830200 - Repairs to the Secondary Process
Originating Year: 2008 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2023/24 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 1,220,776 - -
2022-23 829,224 - -
2023-24 450,000 -
2024-25 450,000 - -
2025-26 265,000 - -
2026-27 265,000 - -
2027-28 265,000 - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 1,695,000 - -
Grand Total 3,745,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The Power Generation Facility (PGF) at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) was built in 1997 with the gas management/controls system to generate power using three fuel sources: landfill gas, digester gas, and natural gas. Stricter emission requirements imposed by the California Air Resources Board and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District combined with the declining quality of landfill gas continue to raise the cost of operating the engines, requiring frequent tune-ups and additional gas pre-treatment.
Over the last few years there were several instances when the engines "dropped" off the power distribution grid, resulting in immediate demand for PG&E, who provides back-up power. The instantaneous load results in significant cost increases in the WPCP utility bill, estimated at $80,000 to $100,000 per year in demand charges and peak day pricing. Additionally, legislation and regulation are currently being considered to further reduce emissions associated with combustion power generation for the WPCP engine types.
The scope of this project includes ongoing rebuilds and preventative measures to ensure reliable engine operations and adherence to emission regulations. A new PGF is being contemplated as part of the WPCP rebuild and is anticipated to be on- line by 2028.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
PGF is currently scheduled to be replaced in the 4 - 5 years. This project is proposed to complete more rigorous re-builds of the engines and replacement of the associated components to ensure compliance with the air regulations as well as reliable operations until the new facility is completed.
The obsolete engine control system on the No. 2 PGF was upgraded in 2018, the No 1 PGF engine control system was replaced in early 2022 in conjunction with the major overhaul.
The digester gas dryer, and PGF engine gas flowmeters are also on schedule for replacement in FY 2022/23.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 830210 - Repairs to the Power Generation Facility
Originating Year: 2008 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2027/28 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 1,073,459 - -
2022-23 809,709 - -
2023-24 121,079 -
2024-25 639,224 - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 760,303 - -
Grand Total 2,643,471 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project funds the rehabilitation of the tertiary treatment process at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP). Master Planning for the WPCP rebuild has identified that the tertiary process at the facility will most likely not change in technology.
However, electrical and instrumentation upgrades will be needed in the future to integrate with the new treatment plant along with rehabilitation of existing equipment.
In the interim, some extensive rehabilitation is necessary to maintain operations of the WPCP and compliance with the City's NPDES permit. The tertiary process of the WPCP consists of four Dual Media Filters (DMF), which are large tanks filled with sand and anthracite coal that provide filtration, and disinfection facilities consisting of chlorine contact tanks. Most rehabilitation will be completed by the pending Existing Plant Rehabilitation Project.
This Project will address items not included in the Existing Plant Rehabilitation Project.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Project implementation is phased over several years to allow for continued operation of the WPCP and sequencing of the processes and equipment to ensure adequate processing capacity for the incoming wastewater. Mechanical, electrical and control system evaluations were conducted, and the final condition assessment report was used to develop and design the Existing Plant Rehabilitation Project. Due to the Existing Plant Rehabilitation Project Budget constraints some identified areas in the condition assessment report were excluded from the project. Project items identified that may be addressed in this project are the Filtered Water Pump overhauls, coatings and DMF galley filtered water flowmeter replacements and DMF media replacements. Pond effluent flow bypass pipping is essential for the operation of the tertiary system. Funds may also be used for modifications of the emergency pond effluent bypass piping installation.
Fiscal Impact
The project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues. Existing implementation funds are proposed to support rehabilitation or replacement of the tertiary process equipment through FY 2024/25 in alignment with the Plant Rehabilitation.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 830220 - Repairs to the Tertiary Process
Originating Year: 2008 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2024/25 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 466 - -
2022-23 113,646 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 114,112 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project funds a study that will identify sources of direct Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) of ground water into the sanitary sewer collection system. I&I contributes to additional hydraulic loading in the collection system which increases treatment costs as well as reduces design collection system conveyance capacity. I&I causes poor recycled water quality. The City is currently producing recycled water with a higher than average salinity content, which is affecting the overall quality and usability of recycled water for certain applications. The current sewage treatment process used by the City is not effective at removing salinity.
Several neighboring cities have been successful at reducing salinity and treatment costs by identifying and correcting sources of groundwater I&I. The first phase of this project will conduct a feasibility study to identify sanitary sewer pipe segments where I&I is occurring. Conductivity monitors are deployed at strategic locations in the collection system where I&I is suspected. The information collected by conductivity meters identifies pipe segments where high salinity is occurring, which is generally indicative of an I&I source. Pipe segments are typically recommended to be rehabilitated to eliminate the I&I source. The most common method of pipe rehabilitation to correct I&I sources is cured-in-place pipe lining (CIPP), but replacement and/or spot repairs may be necessary as well. This study may result in additional funding needs based on study findings.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project will identify sources of groundwater I&I, which may be affecting the quality of recycled water produced by the WPCP.
The sanitary sewer collection system and the WPCP stand to benefit from this project by improving recycled water quality and reducing treatment costs associated with additional hydraulic loading. The reliability of the collection should also be improved as capacity in the system will be increased with the reduction of the additional hydraulic loading.
Failing to undertake this project would result in increased treatment costs to improve recycled water quality. It could also result in illicit sewage discharges from the sanitary sewer collection system due to hydraulic overloading which would have adverse public health and environmental impacts, as well as result in regulatory penalties and fines.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Wastewater Management Fund. This project is necessary to minimize treatment costs and improve recycled water quality. FY 2022/23 project funding will be used to see the project to completion in FY 2024/25.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 830260 - Sanitary Sewer Salinity Reduction Study
Originating Year: 2014 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2024/25 Category: Special Project Manager: Mansour Nasser Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2023-24 82,797 - -
2024-25 - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 104,381 - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total 104,381 - -
Grand Total 187,178 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
CFD is mandated by the State's stormwater permit to maintain twenty stormwater biotreatment basins, which require rehabilitation of infrastructure every ten years. This includes the replacement of plants and drainage materials, with an estimated cost of $75,000. While the City has allocated funds for a portion of the improvements to take place in FY 22-23, this project seeks to secure funding for the remaining work needed to ensure compliance with the permit requirements for all basins.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The City's current landscape vendor for CFD No.3 has provided a quote (attached) for recommended improvements, which includes the replacement of plants and drainage materials, at an estimated cost of $75,000. We propose to utilize the allocated funds in FY 22-23 to initiate the project and aim to secure additional funding for FY 2023/24 to complete the remaining work for all basins.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded through an annual property assessment of homes located within CFD No. 3. Project expenditure is limited to funds collected under CFD No 3.
Funding Sources
Community Facilities District No. 3 (Estates at Sunnyvale) Fund Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 831390 - CFD No.3 - Ten Year Infrastructure Improvements Plan Originating Year: 2016 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Mansour Nasser Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 392,833 - -
2022-23 100,000 - -
2023-24 100,000 -
2024-25 100,000 - -
2025-26 250,000 - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 450,000 - -
Grand Total 942,833 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) Master Plan is completed and the facilities will be reconstructed over the next 10 to 15 years, existing buildings and supporting structures need major rehabilitation to make them last until the new structures are built.
These various support facilities will require updates to heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) related equipment upgrades, Plant service air compressor replacements, power generation building roof repair and fan replacements, sodium bisulfite pump station canopy, painting of various structures and equipment.
The proposed budget includes funding for plant wide facility repairs including roof and heating/cooling systems, building upgrades and a canopy at the Sodium Bisulfite pump station. The sodium bisulfite pump station is subject to the elements, water intrusion into the pump controls and the electrical system has caused pump failures. Temporary corrective measures are in place until a permanent structure can be installed. Due to the pump station location the installation of the new canopy will follow the completion of the planned flood wall which is anticipated to be completed by FY 2025/26.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The WPCP has several buildings and facilities that are in varying states of decay, as the buildings are over 40+ years old and are in need of replacement. Also, the new administration building and laboratory that was initially proposed is currently unfunded and repairs will need to be done until there is a new building.
Fiscal Impact
This project will be funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 831620 - Repairs to the WPCP Support Facilities
Originating Year: 2016 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2025/26 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 147,572 - -
2022-23 325,000 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 472,572 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
Solids processing facilities at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) consist of four digesters and associated piping and pumping systems along with the gas collection systems. The digested solids were processed further on tile beds for further drying and hauled off site for disposal. The solids drying operation has been transferred to a contracted operation to allow for the area of the tile beds to be prepared for the construction of the new headworks and primary treatment facilities. This project allows for modifications to the solids conveyance systems, supernatant drainage system and the pumping station improvements needed to allow for the transition of the drying operation to a contracted operation. Further, the project allows for digestor repairs and other modifications required to operate the solids handling facilities safely and efficiently.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Recent projects involve repairs to the digesters that are part of the solids handling facilities. These include repairs to the digesters dome cover and the seals to prevent gas leaks and adding improved hatches for safe access and digester gas system conveyance upgrades.
Fiscal Impact
This project will be funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 831630 - Repairs to Solids/Dewatering Facilities
Originating Year: 2016 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2022/23 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 125,160 - -
2022-23 274,063 - -
2023-24 113,948 -
2024-25 107,897 - -
2025-26 105,327 - -
2026-27 109,541 - -
2027-28 113,922 - -
2028-29 118,479 - -
2029-30 123,218 - -
2030-31 128,147 - -
2031-32 133,273 - -
2032-33 138,604 - -
2033-34 144,148 - -
2034-35 149,914 - -
2035-36 155,910 - -
2036-37 162,147 - -
2037-38 168,632 - -
2038-39 175,377 - -
2039-40 182,392 - -
2040-41 189,688 - -
2041-42 197,275 - -
2042-43 203,194 - -
20 Year Total 2,921,032 - -
Grand Total 3,320,255 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project provides for wastewater utility surface access adjustments in order to preserve consistent height with surfaces and roadways. Wastewater utility surface access features include manholes, clean out and inspection covers, drainage inlets, and other wastewater infrastructure surface access points. Wastewater utility surface access points can be impacted by street rehabilitation activities and other excavation projects.
Paving rehabilitation projects generally have an effect on the elevation of the surfaces of existing utility access assets. This project provides funding for the adjustment of utility access infrastructure with paving rehabilitation with both contracted and in- house projects. Additionally, the City performs utility access surface restoration as a result of public inquiry, unsafe condition, other misalignment, or in conjunction with other operational activities. This project will also provide funding for the purchase of new wastewater utility surface access covers that are worn out, damaged, structurally compromised, or those that are not able to be reinstalled.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project will ensure that wastewater utility surface access assets are maintained and restored in a manner that is consistent with City standards. The project will also ensure that wastewater utility surface access assets are able to be restored to a condition that allows for the smooth travel of vehicles and bicycles on roadways and other surfaces where utility access covers are not uniform.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Wastewater Management Fund.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 831680 - Adjust Sewer Utilities In Support of Paving Projects Originating Year: 2016 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Marlon Quiambao Jr.
Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 1,492,903 - -
2023-24 6,456,492 - -
2024-25 3,030,447 -
2025-26 1,907,914 - -
2026-27 1,123,233 - -
2027-28 1,035,601 - -
2028-29 1,037,025 - -
2029-30 1,038,505 - -
2030-31 1,040,046 - -
2031-32 149,932 - -
2032-33 43,313 - -
2033-34 45,047 - -
2034-35 46,848 - -
2035-36 48,722 - -
2036-37 182,415 - -
2037-38 189,711 - -
2038-39 197,299 - -
2039-40 56,998 - -
2040-41 58,754 - -
2041-42 61,104 - -
2042-43 63,548 - -
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total 11,356,463 - -
Grand Total 19,305,857 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) Oxidation Pond Levee Rehabilitation project provides funding for site assessments, weed abatement, levee repairs, levee maintenance, levee road maintenance, and other levee related work to keep this critical asset sound for the next 20 years. These levees form the containment, flow paths, and pumping structures that make-up the WPCP Secondary Treatment Process. The levee roads allow the public to enjoy access to the lower south bay slough systems while keeping the Bay and Storm water from entering the WPCP Secondary Treatment process.
The oxidation ponds are contained by approximately eight miles of earthen levees formed by clamshell dredging and compaction. The WPCP levee system has not had any significant rehabilitation since the ponds were commissioned in the late 1960s. The network of levees has become significantly overgrown vegetation and significant erosion has occured along the levee roads. The proposed weed abatement will remove all vegetation (estimated at approximately eight acres) from the levees and manage regrowth overtime. Also, this project will also rehabilitate sections of the levee roads which have become significantly worn and eroded.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
A City-wide condition assessment study was conducted of City structures. WPCP oxidation pond levees were included in this study. Areas along the levees were identified for repair in this condition assessment study. The information in the condition assessment was used to create the WPCP Pond Levee Operations and Maintenance manual. Rehabilitation projects may include, but are not limited to, structurally reinforcing the levees, repairing breaches and cracks, removing weeds, and raising subsided sections of the levees. On-call engineering firms will provide construction management support and outside contractors will perform the repair work. Segments with the highest likelihood of impact will be given priority.
Additional funding needed to complete repairs to South, West and completion of the East pond levees. Cost estimates have now been refined based on actual construction costs of one section of levee repair. Costs estimates for the West levee repair range from $650,00 to $1,820,033 depending on repair option chosen. The cost estimate to repair the remaining section of the East levee is $4.5M given on page 6 of the HDR Engineers design memo. A rough cost estimate of $4M for the repair of the south levee is based on in house repairs per Operations and Maintenance manual.
Fiscal Impact
The initial cost estimate indicated up to $27 million would be needed for all repairs identified in the engineering report and the most urgent repair work is budgeted and underway. Additional funding would be required to address all repairs. The twenty-year budget is based on oxidation pond weed abatement costs and in house levee repair projections.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment EM - Environmental Management - EM-8: Protection of Creeks and Bay 831730 - WPCP Oxidation Pond Levee Rehabilitation
Originating Year: 2016 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Capital Project Manager: Matthew Hoang Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 3,835 - -
2023-24 - - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 3,835 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
As the City adopts the Master Plan to rebuild the Water Pollution Control Plant, there is growing interest from corporations, wholesale water agencies and retailers in the region to partner with the City in expanding its recycled water program and potentially develop potable reuse projects as well. The recent drought has further emphasized this need for reuse projects. There are several complex technical issues and regulatory and financial impacts to be evaluated, and concepts developed in partnership with other adjacent cities and the water agencies such as Valley Water further the planning efforts related to potable re-use. This project could also be utilized in extending technical assistance to companies interested in using recycled water. The technical expertise and resources needed for these evaluations are beyond the scope of City staff and would further need to align with the Program Management Consultant team's efforts in implementing the Master Plan. Therefore, this project is needed to support the planning efforts related to potable and non-potable reuse and respond to requests for technical information and review of ideas and concepts presented by regional partners related to re-use.
In the past, the WPCP produced Recycled Water (RW) with relative ease. Title 22 of CA Code of Regulations describes guidelines for production and use (RW is also known as Title 22 water). The main requirement for Title 22 water is to have a solids content of <2 NTU. However, in the past 2 years, the plant has had a difficult time producing <2 NTU water. In fact, our RW production has stopped for the last year. The primary reason for this is due to the water quality changing in our pond system. In the last couple of years, the ponds have been propagating a single cell, sub-micron blue-green algae species in high quantities. This algae and other solids are typically taken out in our Air Flotation Tanks (AFTs) after the wastewater returns to the plant from the ponds, however, due to the small size of this unique algae, the AFTs have not been able to take it out. As a result, it ends up in our Dual Media Filters (DMFs) and tends to choke it. Because of this, the efficiency of the DMFs has reduced resulting in producing poor quality water that is not suitable for RW. We would like to run a filter study pilot (example, disk filters, cloth filters and the like) that can accommodate any type of algae and still produce <2 NTU water. This would allow us to produce RW continuously.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
It is important for the City to produce RW, especially during drought years, which has been the case for the past few years. This project will look at different ways of producing RW including using new equipment. Before installing new equipment, they need to be pilot tested to affirm the equipment works for our wastewater. Equipment vendors have small pilot plants they rent for short periods of time to test wastewater. This type of a pilot study allows us to confirm the process works for our wastewater before we make a decision to buy equipment for the plant, which is a sizable expense and effort. Currently there are multiple vendors approved to produce RW. These technologies are mostly disk and cloth filters. This project will plan to run pilot studies with this equipment with multiple vendors side by side so that they could competitively bid in the event the City decides to implement the technology.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Wastewater Management Fund and the Water Supply and Distribution Fund.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund 58%, Water Supply and Distribution Fund 42% Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-2: Water Conservation EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 832430 - Recycled and Potable Water Plan Development
Originating Year: 2018 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2023/24 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Mansour Nasser Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 - - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 1,710,792 - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 1,710,792 - -
Grand Total 1,710,792 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project provides funding for an update to the master plan for the sanitary sewer system and storm drain system. The project will assess the hydraulics, system models, physical condition, and separation and maintenance of the collection systems, and will recommend improvements to provide adequate hydraulic capacity and improve the reliability of the collection system. It will include an analysis of the financial impacts of the recommendations and scheduling, and may inform revisions to Project 825331 - Replacement, Rehabilitation, and Repair of Sewer Pipes.
The City provides sanitary sewer services to residents and businesses within the City as well as a portion of Cupertino known as Rancho Rinconada. This study is needed to define the capital projects that will be necessary to replace aging infrastructure and to identify any capacity-increasing projects that may be needed as a result of in-fill development. This type of plan is considered to be a best management practice for ensuring that the wastewater collection system can continue to provide reliable service.
A sewer master plan including hydraulic models for the storm and sanitary systems was completed in FY 2014/15. This project will update the models and analyze and develop alternatives for future wastewater capital projects and funding.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project is necessary to maintain existing essential infrastructure of the Wastewater Utility that excludes the WPCP. The information developed as a result of this study can allow the City to require developers to pay for capacity increases or for rehabilitation of existing sewers. This project will also fulfill several regulatory requirements for wastewater asset management.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund revenues. When completed, the master planning effort will likely result in new project recommendations that will be proposed in future capital improvements budgets.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 833050 - Wastewater Master Plan Update
Originating Year: 2018 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2029/30 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Eric Evans Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 352,690 - -
2022-23 198,738 - -
2023-24 207,365 -
2024-25 208,704 - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 209,899 - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 213,995 - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 218,170 - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 222,427 - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 283,459 - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 288,989 - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 353,554 - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 360,452 - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 367,485 - -
20 Year Total 2,934,498 - -
Grand Total 3,485,926 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The City of Sunnyvale Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) provides wastewater treatment for the residents and businesses within the city. The Primary treatment process removes solids in the influent. Those separated solids are collected and sent to the anaerobic digestion treatment process.
Over time, the WPCP Digesters accumulate debris. This debris impedes the operation of digester equipment and decreases the solids reduction efficiency. Digester Cleaning is required at regular intervals to ensure that the city's anaerobic digesters have sufficient treatment capacity and to protect digester equipment from damage. During the cleaning process, Digesters are taken out of service, and a contractor is hired to break up and remove the fixed debris and other inorganic material trapped in the digesters. The contractor also dewaters trapped biosolids during the cleaning process and hauls them off-site for proper disposal.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Task-specific contractor equipment and specially trained staff are required to handle digester cleaning safely and efficiently. The need to clean the anaerobic digesters increased when the WPCP upgraded and rehabilitated all four of the Plant's anaerobic digesters. These upgrades allow for better mixing, reduced solids, and increased digester gas production, all positive benefits.
However, the trade-off with better mixing systems is more frequent cleaning. The current cleaning interval will be extended post- completion of the New Headworks Project, part of the Sunnyvale Cleanwater Program, and all the digesters have been cleaned at least once post-startup of the New Headworks and Primary Treatment facilities. The mechanical systems that are part of the new Headworks will remove most of the problematic material that currently ends up inside the digesters, decreasing the required cleaning frequency.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Wastewater Management Fund revenues. Cost projections are based on the current contract for the required service, and future costs are based on the market rate for the same service. Under the current contract and the potential reduction in need when the new headworks treatment process comes online, a reduction of 1.2 million dollars over the 20-year horizon is anticipated.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 833060 - WPCP Annual Digester Cleaning
Originating Year: 2017 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Special Project Manager: Bryan Berdeen Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 170,564 - -
2022-23 343,516 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - 6,155
2026-27 - - 6,339
2027-28 - - 6,530
2028-29 - - 6,725
2029-30 - - 6,927
2030-31 - - 7,135
2031-32 - - 7,349
2032-33 - - 7,570
2033-34 - - 7,797
2034-35 - - 8,031
2035-36 - - 8,271
2036-37 - - 8,520
2037-38 - - 8,775
2038-39 - - 9,040
2039-40 - - 9,311
2040-41 - - 9,591
2041-42 - - 9,878
2042-43 - - 10,175
20 Year Total - - 144,118
Grand Total 514,080 - 144,118
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project scope funds the implementation of a web-based operations and maintenance (O&M) manual for the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) that is similar to or the same as other document management systems the City uses. This project is intended to replace the limited, narrative-based paper O&M manual. The WPCP Electronic Operations and Maintenance Manual (EOM) project aimed to develop a living document, repository, and seamless interface. Regulations require O&M information to be readily available for training and as a response reference to keep plant personnel safe, the process compliant, and for systems to run as efficiently as possible.
When systems fail, the WPCP O&M team requires rapid access to accurate technical information. The new system is intended to reduce the time spent searching through folders, binders, and other documents that may contain obsolete information. This project also facilitates the capture and transition of institutional O&M knowledge from departing employees. The WPCP Electronic Operations and Maintenance Manual project also includes the procurement, installation, and implementation of an electronic logbook, another regulatory requirement, to increase operational efficiency further and simplify historical review of process changes and system troubleshooting.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The City's WPCP Cleanwater program is replacing old wastewater treatment systems and updating existing ones. The information needed to operate and maintain these systems reliably must include an intuitive method of storing and retrieving any WPCP documentation. Changes in nearly every future process require operations and maintenance team members (that are turning over as well) to have access to a centralized, user-friendly interface to view standard operating procedures (SOPs), record drawings, equipment information, process control descriptions, operating manuals, regulatory information, and historical data from the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), Enterprise Asset Management System/Computerized Maintenance Management System (EAMS/CMMS) and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA). An electronic O&M manual would also facilitate training new employees, refreshing the knowledge of existing staff, and function as an up-to-date reference for a wide variety of information. The City’s NPDES permit requires the wastewater treatment plant to furnish and maintain accurate O&M manuals, SOPs, and record drawings. These documents are necessary for the reliable operation, maintenance, and troubleshooting of treatment and support systems.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Wastewater Management Fund revenues. Costs are based on the amount of effort required to fully populate a digital platform, the transition from one system to another, and to procure an online logbook based on market availability.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment 833070 - WPCP Electronic Operations and Maintenance Manual Originating Year: 2018 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2024/25 Category: Capital Project Manager: Bryan Berdeen Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 759,787 - -
2023-24 50,000 - -
2024-25 50,000 -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total 50,000 - -
Grand Total 859,787 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
A sanitary sewer system hydraulic model is an essential tool for determining where existing sewer pipes may need to be upsized to accommodate existing and future development. The City completed an initial model in 2015, and then a much more detailed model in 2022. During both efforts, temporary flow meters installed during relatively dry winters were not able to record increases in sewer flows that happen during rain storms. This project will allow for installation of flow meters during upcoming rainy seasons, and allow for updates and recalibration of the hydraulic model based upon the new data.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The 2022 hydraulic model update identified sewer capacity improvement projects. However, the necessary sizes of larger pipes, and the timing of when the projects should be implemented, are uncertain due to lack of wet weather flow data. Upon successful collection of wet weather data, these parameters will be better understood, and staff will be able to proceed with efficient project implementation.
Fiscal Impact
Proposed budget in two consecutive fiscal years allows for attempted collection of wet weather flow data in the first year that, if unsuccessful due to dry weather, can be attempted again the following year. After successful data collection, funding allows for the engineering effort of updating the model and providing a summary report.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 833090 - Sanitary System Hydraulic Model Update
Originating Year: 2018 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2024/25 Category: Capital Project Manager: Eric Evans Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 - - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 279,541 - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 279,541 - -
Grand Total 279,541 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
A storm collection system model was prepared in FY 2014/15 and was limited to all pipelines 36-inches and larger plus smaller pipes as required to make connections. This project is to revisit the model and update it. This project will be done to coincide with the Project 833050 - Wastewater Master Plan Update.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
System modeling information is critical to ensure that necessary information is available to make the appropriate project planning decisions and determine system capacity. The storm modeling is critical in assessing how the storm system is performing and whether capacity improvements are needed.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the General Fund.
Funding Sources
General Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System EM - Environmental Management - EM-8: Protection of Creeks and Bay 833091 - Storm System Hydraulic Model Update - General Fund Originating Year: 2019 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2029/30 Category: Capital Project Manager: Eric Evans Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 25,011 - -
2023-24 974,989 - -
2024-25 - -
2025-26 970,000 - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 3,850,000 - -
2028-29 940,000 - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 3,760,000 - -
2031-32 1,080,000 - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 4,290,000 - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total 14,890,000 - -
Grand Total 15,890,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
Sewer capacity projects previously identified in the 2015 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan and budgeted under this capital number have been superseded by the projects listed below, as identified by a 2022 Wastewater sewer capacity study.
Design of CIP-1, CIP-2, and CIP-3 are scheduled for FY 2025-26, FY 2027-28, and 2031-32 respectively. Wet weather flow monitoring data collected in early 2023 may result in changes to the proposed scopes, budgets, and timing of these projects.
CIP 1: S. Mary Ave from Cambridge Ave to north of W. Evelyn Drive. Upsize existing 6”-12” pipe with 10”-15” pipe.
CIP-2: New Arques Lift Station: Install new force main, wet well, and pump system.
CIP-3: Along E. California Ave., Roosevelt Ave., and E. Arques Ave., upsize existing 21” pipe with 24”-30” pipe.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Many existing sewer lines are not large enough to carry existing peak wet weather flows. Upsizing of sewer lines is necessary to reliably convey the wastewater to the Water Pollution Control Plant, prevent sewer overflows and accommodate future growth.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by the Wastewater Management Fund.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 834460 - Sewer Capacity Enhancement Projects
Originating Year: 2019 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2035/36 Category: Capital Project Manager: Bennett Chun Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 34,593 - -
2023-24 87,798 - -
2024-25 66,808 -
2025-26 68,812 - -
2026-27 - - 64,272
2027-28 - - 64,272
2028-29 - - 64,272
2029-30 - - 64,272
2030-31 - - 64,272
2031-32 - - 64,272
2032-33 - - 64,272
2033-34 - - 64,272
2034-35 - - 64,272
2035-36 - - 64,272
2036-37 - - 64,272
2037-38 - - 64,272
2038-39 - - 64,272
2039-40 - - 64,272
2040-41 - - 64,272
2041-42 - - 64,272
2042-43 - - 64,272
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total 135,620 - 1,092,624
Grand Total 258,011 - 1,092,624
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project funds the transition of Laboratory protocols and practices to address new standards for Laboratory Certification, adopted by the State of California. ESD's Lab provides water quality testing for both drinking water and wastewater, and certification is required for both services. Implementation of the new standards is required to be in place by December 2023.
Extension of the project is proposed to include support for validating implementation and evaluating ongoing workload impacts based on actual implementation.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The State has completed a multi-year process to adopt more stringent standards for water quality laboratory certification. The State's update more closely mirrors national standards, which include much more stringent requirements for quality control and operational documentation. This project provides consultant support and limited temporary staffing to address transition to the new standard.
Implementing the new certification standards requires significant additional work to maintain a robust quality control program including much more documentation. The addition of a Limited Term position provides more stable staffing to support the implementation as the department evaluates how needs may change with implementation experience.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater Management Fund and Water Supply and Distribution Fund revenues. Additional funding proposed is for 50% of a Limited Term Lab/Field Tech for FY 2023/24 through FY 2025/26. The other half of the funding for this position is available in the Operating Budget for ESD Program 14705 Environmental Laboratory.
The ongoing funding in the Lab's Operating Budget has been used for temporary agency staffing. In the last 18 months, it has been very difficult to get and retain (for even the 6 months) temp agency staffing and the Limited Term approach will provide some valuable reprieve from the inherent turn-over and recent impracticability of 6-month assignments.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund, Water Supply and Distribution Fund Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment EM - Environmental Management - EM-3: Reliable and Safe Water Distribution 834720 - Laboratory Certification Update
Originating Year: 2019 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2025/26 Category: Special Project Manager: Melody Tovar Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 29,313 - -
2023-24 1,040,355 5,440,835 -
2024-25 1,069,668 4,464,029 -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 5,320,744 - -
2027-28 4,595,316 - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
2043-44 - - -
20 Year Total 10,985,728 4,464,029 -
Grand Total 12,055,396 9,904,864 -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
On September 20, 2016 Council approved the Peery Park Specific Plan. The plan calls for developers to pay $3.12/net new square foot of development to be put towards wastewater infrastructure improvements to accommodate increased development in the Peery Park area.
The project is scheduled to begin design in FY 2024-25, with construction beginning in FY 2026-27. Wet weather flow monitoring data collected in early 2023 may result in proposed changes to the scope, budget, and timing of this project.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
Based upon the wastewater study performed, a number of larger diameter sewer pipes need to be upsized to serve the increased development anticipated in the Peery Park area. The Peery Park wastewater capacity improvement fees will cover design and construction costs associated with increasing size of the larger (10" and larger) sanitary sewer pipelines, per the study. Each development project will be responsible for performing a sanitary sewer analysis to determine if the sewer mains fronting their project need to be upsized; costs for the analysis and subsequent upsizing will be the developer's responsibility.
Fiscal Impact
Funding for this project is provided by fees assessed to developers within the Peery Park Specific Plan area. It is anticipated that some wastewater capacity improvements may be performed by the developer. However, should a development project not do the construction, the fees would be collected for the City to perform a capital project. Funding shown is the maximum amount anticipated, should all developers pay instead of constructing the wastewater infrastructure.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 834750 - Peery Park Specific Plan Wastewater Capacity Improvements Originating Year: 2018 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2027/28 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Bennett Chun Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual 386,629 - -
2022-23 363,371 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 750,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
All costs are associated with active litigation regarding alleged non-compliance with the Stormwater Permit and potential leakage from the sanitary sewer collection system into the stormwater system causing or contributing to exceedances of water quality objectives for bacteria in local waterways. The case could possibly move to the trial phase in January 2023.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
In February 2020, Baykeeper filed suit against the City of Sunnyvale and the City of Mountain View alleging violations of the Clean Water Act/non-compliance with the Stormwater Permit due to bacteria discharges above water quality standards. Plaintiff alleges the potential that such discharges are the result of leakage from the sanitary sewer collection system into the storm drainage system as described above. This project funds outside litigations costs due to the complex nature of the case.
Fiscal Impact
Funding included in this project covers attorney fees. If the case settles before trial, the full amount of $750,000 will not be necessary. In the event of settlement, a separate project would be established to fund commitments under the settlement agreement.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System EM - Environmental Management - EM-8: Protection of Creeks and Bay 835480 - Baykeeper Litigation Expenses
Originating Year: 2020 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2023/24 Category: Special Project Manager: John Nagel Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 115,000 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 115,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The City of Sunnyvale provides sewer service to a subdivision of 91 homes in the City of Cupertino and Valley Water requested the City remove the existing sewer pipe bridge due to a Calabazas Creek improvement project. This project will include removing the sewer bridge and diverting sewage flow from 91 homes to Cupertino Sanitary District (CuSD) pipe system, and diversion back into City of Sunnyvale pipe system. An executed agreement between the City of Sunnyvale and Cupertino Sanitation District outlines the responsibilities for the project.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project was prompted by Valley Water to remove an existing City sewer pipe bridge from Calabazas Creek serving 91 City homes. The City needed to find an alternative routing of the sewage flow away from the bridge. The City negotiated an agreement with Cupertino Sanitary District to divert the flow from the 91 homes into their system. This project will find the diversion of the flow, for the City to receive the flow back at a different location. Other options considered would have still required the sewage flow to cross the Creek and were deemed cost-prohibitive.
Fiscal Impact
The cost to remove the bridge and make appropriate improvements is estimated at $115,000. The agreement with CuSD will not affect the level of service provided to the residents of the 91 homes and the transfer will be seamless with no interruption in service. The City will continue to respond to service calls and perform any facility improvement within the subdivision.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 835991 - Cupertino Sanitary District Sewer Flow Diversion Originating Year: 2021 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2022/23 Category: Capital Project Manager: Mansour Nasser Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 - - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 100,000 - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 100,000 - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 100,000 - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 100,000 - -
20 Year Total 400,000 - -
Grand Total 400,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The State Water Resources Control Board, which regulates sanitary sewer systems issued a statewide Order 2022-0103-DWQ on December 8, 2022 updating sanitary sewer systems regulations. The City of Sunnyvale as an operator of a wastewater collections system is required to prepare a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) by 2026 and every five years thereafter.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
The SSMP is aimed at reducing sanitary sewer overflows and should includes elements demonstrating how the City constructs, manages, operates and maintains its sanitary sewer system.
Fiscal Impact
$100,000 will fund the services of a consultant to prepare the SSMP. This project is funded by Wastewater utility rates. Rates are set to cover the cost of operations and capital projects required to maintain the system and provide Wastewater service.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 836230 - Sewer System Management Plan
Originating Year: 2023 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: Ongoing Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Winola Cheong Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 - - -
2023-24 2,025,000 -
2024-25 225,000 - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 2,250,000 - -
Grand Total 2,250,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
The Digester No.3 Improvement project will repair the failed interior and exterior annular tank lid seal. This seal prevents methane gas which is collected at the top of the tank from leaking out to atmosphere. In order to increase the life of the epoxy seal the tank lid skirt which extends into the tank will be lengthened to prevent exposure to the methane gas. In addition, a new larger side hatch will be installed similar to the Digester 1 and 2. The removal of the tank lid will facilitate the hatch installation.
The larger hatch will facilitate safer entries into the tank by plant staff and contractors.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project was initially developed for construction under the plant Maintenance program. However, due to the scale of the project it has been determined that a Public Works project is needed to complete the project. The design and construction estimate has been completed by an outside engineering firm. This digester is currently operating under a very constrained operating level due to the failed seal.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater utility rates. Rates are set to cover the cost of operations and capital projects required to maintain the system and provide Wastewater service.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment EM - Environmental Management - EM-11: Improved Air Quality 836380 - WPCP Digester No. 3 Improvement Project
Originating Year: 2023 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2024/25 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 - - -
2023-24 100,000 -
2024-25 430,000 - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total 530,000 - -
Grand Total 530,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project consists of the construction of a new permanent chemical storage tank facility consisting of one chemical storage tank with chemical dosing pump skid. The permanent chemical storage facility is to be constructed to accommodate all health and safety requirements. Chemical treatment is needed to treat pond effluent water With changing pond water quality in the future, the plant needs to have the capacity to store chemicals to treat this pond effluent.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
About six months ago, temporary chemical tanks were installed to test the effectiveness of multiple chemical regimes to mitigate the pond algae. In the last couple of years, the ponds have been propagating a single cell, sub-micron blue-green algae species in high quantities. This algae and other solids are typically taken out in our Air Flotation Tanks (AFTs) after the wastewater returns to the plant from the ponds, however, due to the small size of this unique algae, the AFTs have not been able to take it out this algae. This has resulted in the plant’s ability to meet its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limits difficult. In fact, the plant violated its NPDES permit limit 5 times this past summer. Each violation can result in a $3,000 penalty. The new chemical regimes have proven to be effective, however, a permanent tank storage facility is needed to store the chemicals. This includes a permanent concrete pad, one chemical storage tank and dosing station. The current temporary chemical storage tanks have an engineered useful life of about 2 years in the current construction.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by Wastewater utility rates. Rates are set to cover the cost of operations and capital projects required to maintain the system and provide Wastewater service.
Funding Sources
Wastewater Management Fund
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-7: Effective Wastewater Treatment EM - Environmental Management - EM-2: Water Conservation 836390 - WPCP Chemical Tank Storage Facility
Originating Year: 2023 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2024/25 Category: Infrastructure Project Manager: Leonard Espinoza Attachment 2
Project Financial Summary
Project Costs Revenues Operating Costs
Prior Actual - - -
2022-23 25,000 - -
2023-24 - -
2024-25 - - -
2025-26 - - -
2026-27 - - -
2027-28 - - -
2028-29 - - -
2029-30 - - -
2030-31 - - -
2031-32 - - -
2032-33 - - -
2033-34 - - -
2034-35 - - -
2035-36 - - -
2036-37 - - -
2037-38 - - -
2038-39 - - -
2039-40 - - -
2040-41 - - -
2041-42 - - -
2042-43 - - -
20 Year Total - - -
Grand Total 25,000 - -
Project Description/Scope/Purpose
This project will fund the abandonment of a small section of Sunnyvale's sewer line. In the 1950s, the City of Sunnyvale entered an agreement with developers that allowed the Rancho Rinconada sewer system to be tied into a City sewer main. This sewer main would serve a mostly residential area that did not have direct access to a sewer collection system. The sewer system was constructed to meet the City's standards and allowed the City to collect fees from homeowners and businesses to reimburse the City for the costs of providing ongoing sewer service. In January 2021, the City reached out to the City of San Jose to investigate a change that was made to the existing sewer main. This change included a new manhole which plugged Sunnyvale's pipeline.
A new sewer pipe was constructed which diverted the flow into the City of San Jose's sewer system. After several meetings, both cities came to an agreement where the City of San Jose will pay the City of Sunnyvale $800,000 to return the system to its previous condition. This change in systems will also require the abandonment of a small section of Sunnyvale's sewer line that is south of the new manhole.
Project Evaluation and Analysis
This project is required to properly abandon a section of sewer line that is no longer in use. This process is a regulatory requirement and needed to complete the transfer of a portion of the City's sewer system outside of the City to the City of San José.
Fiscal Impact
This project is funded by a settlement payment in the amount of $800,000 received as part of the agreement to transfer the system.
Funding Sources
Settlement of claims
Plans and Goals
EM - Environmental Management - EM-6: Effective Wastewater Collection System 836440 - Abandonment of Rancho Rinconada Sewer Line Segment Originating Year: 2022 Project Type: Wastewater Department: 270 - Environmental Services Planned Completion Year: 2023/24 Category: Special Project Manager: Tim Kirby Attachment 2
www.hydroscience.com
APPENDIX 10A
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan
SSMP Change Log
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan Change Log
April 2025
www.hydroscience.com
Element #
Section #
(2020)
Element #
Section #
(2025)
Description of Change/Revision
Appendices Appendices Appendices have been updated to reflect updates within the SSMP. Some appendices were removed from the SSMP because they are now included in other documents, such as the SERP, to avoid duplication and ease future SSMP updates.
General General Minor clarifying text and formatting updates throughout.
Introduction
C. Definitions,
Ac
ronyms, and
Abbreviations
General The Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations section was extracted from the body of the Introduction section and moved to the beginning of the document for ease of reference.
General General Per the new General Order, the Element numbering has been updated from roman numerals to numbers. Element 1 now combines the Goals and Introduction where previously, there was an Introduction section before Element I.
Goals. This section was generally updated to combine these two sections, reflect updated background and details about the City’s system and the updated regulatory requirements.
General General The term “SSO” has been updated to “spill” throughout the entire document to reflect the updated terminology in the General Order.
General General A. Introduction and B. Regulatory Requirements removed from each element. Introductory text simply placed at the beginning of the Element section. Regulatory requirements placed in a blue box in each Element section.
Introduction
D. References
- Section removed as the new General Order supersedes these requirements.
Introduction Element 1 Per the General Order, the Introduction has been absorbed into Element 1.
Element 1 Introductory text updated to describe new adopted General Order. - Element 1
1.1 SSMP
Im
plementation and
Update Schedule
New section including Table 1-1: SSMP Implementation and Update Schedule added to list the due dates of items to be completed by the City.
Element I
D. Goals and Policies
Element 1
1.2 System Goals
This section was expanded to list the General Plan goals in the text in addition to referring to the link.
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan Change Log
April 2025
www.hydroscience.com
Element #
Section #
(2020)
Element #
Section #
(2025)
Description of Change/Revision
Introduction
B. Sanitary Sewer
Sy
stem Facilities
El
ement 1
1.3 Sewer System
As
set Overview
Se
ction moved to Element 1.
Section title updated to match General Order.
Section reorganized for clarity and sewer system data updated in text and tables to reflect the City’s current GIS records.
Population updated to reflect current data.
Reference and link added to City GIS block maps.
Detail added of changes to the service area since 2020 in the Rancho Rinconada area.
Table 1-2: Service Connection Types added per General Order requirements.
Figure 1-1: Sewer Service Area Boundary added to show the sewer service area boundary which is a new requirement for agencies to submit to the SWRCB starting in 2025.
Tables I-1 through I-6 were combined into Tables 1-3 through 1-5 to list infrastructure as combined totals for those within the City and those within Rancho Rinconada.
Discussion added about known stormwater cross-connections Element II
C. Organization and
St
affing
El
ement 2
2.1 Organization
an
d Staffing
Fi
gure II-1 and Table II-1 were removed from this section and reference was added to the org chart in the SERP, included Appendix 6, to avoid duplication of information and ease future updates.
Clarification added to the Wastewater Operations Manager position description to note that it is also referred to as Senior Environmental Engineer to ensure alignment with the org chart in the SERP.
Clarification added that the City’s flushing equipment is only able to clean pipelines up to 15 inches in diameter.
Text updated regarding LRO to refer to the org chart in the SERP so as not to duplicate information.
Table II-2: City Staff Responsibility for SSMP Elements moved from the body of the report to Appendix 2 to ease future updates.
Link for current staff lists on City’s website removed as this no longer exists.
Spill reporting process referred to SERP.
Element III
C. Sunnyvale
Mu
nicipal Code
El
ement 3
3.1 Sunnyvale
Mu
nicipal Code
(SMC)
Discussion of I/I reduced and referred to discussion in Capacity Analysis.
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan Change Log
April 2025
www.hydroscience.com
Element #
Section #
(2020)
Element #
Section #
(2025)
Description of Change/Revision
- Element 3
3.2 Coordination
Di
scussion of Easement Accessibility Agreements added per General Order requirements.
Discussion of Stormwater Agency Coordination added per General Order requirements.
Element III
D. Agreements with
Satellite Agencies
Element 3
3.2 Coordination
Di
scussion of Agreements with Satellite Agencies moved to subsection under Coordination for organization purposes.
- Appendix 3 Links to SMC added as Appendix 3 per General Order requirements.
Element IX
C. Operations and
Ma
intenance
Program
Element 4
4.1 Updated Map of
Sa
nitary Sewer
System
Reference and link added to City GIS block maps available on the City’s website per General Order requirements.
List added of what is included on the block maps.
Element 4
4.2 Preventive
Op
eration and
Maintenance
Activities
Table 4-1 added to track annual maintenance activities.
CCTV inspection description updated to both pipeline and manhole inspections.
Discussion of updated pipeline inspection cycle added.
Element 4
4.3 Staff and
Training
Table IV-1 is now Table 4-2. Table updated to reflect current staff numbers. 2024 Tailgate Schedule included as Appendix 4C.
Element 4
4.4 Equipment
Inventory
Subsection added to reflect General Order requirements. - Outreach to Sewer Service Contractors subsection removed as the City no longer participates in this program.
Element V
C. Design and
Co
nstruction
Standards
El
ement 5
5.1 Design Criteria
an
d Construction
Standards and
Specifications
References to standards and specifications updated to reflect the most current versions.
Links for standards and specifications removed from the body of the document and placed in Appendix 5 to ease future updates.
Element VI Element 6
As part of the new General Order, the SSO Emergency Response Plan has been updated to a Spill Emergency Response Plan (SERP). To fulfill the new requirements of the SERP, the City published a standalone document in 2023 which is included in the SSMP as an appendix. All content previously detailed in the 2020 SSMP in this section is removed and this section simply refers to the SERP included in the appendix.
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan Change Log
April 2025
www.hydroscience.com
Element #
Section #
(2020)
Element #
Section #
(2025)
Description of Change/Revision
Element VII Element 7 Per the new General Order, this section has been updated from “FOG Control Program” to “Blockage Control Program.” Terminology throughout has been updated and the content has been updated to meet new requirements.
Data in text and tables updated to reflect current statistics.
Element VII
D. FOG Control
Pr
ogram
El
ement 7
7.2 Blockage
Co
ntrol Program
To
reduce duplication of information, the specific SMC references were removed from this section and reference was added to Table 3-1 since it presents the same information.
Table 7-1 rows and columns switched for consistency with other tables. Data updated to show current statistics.
Element VIII Element 8 Element title updated to “System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance, and Capital Improvements” per new General Order. This section was almost completely rewritten per the new General Order requirements.
Element VIII
C. System Evaluation
an
d Capacity
Assurance Plan
(SECAP)
El
ement 8
8.1 System
Ev
aluation and
Condition
Assessment
Condition Assessment portion refers to Element 4 which details the CCTV program and other inspections.
Element 8
8.2 Capacity
As
sessment and
Design Criteria
The City developed a Capacity Analysis, which is included as Appendix 8A, to fulfill the requirements for this section.
Element 8
8.3 Capital
Improvement Plan
Description added of how the City develops the CIP projects based on condition and capacity analyses. The latest version of the City’s budget (FY 2024/25) included as Appendix 8B.
Element IX
C. Performance
Me
asures
El
ement 9
9.1 Performance
Me
asures
Li
st of performance measures updated to reflect latest SSMP Audit Presentation and discussion of performance measure statistics updated.
Data in text, tables, and figures updated to represent most recent data.
Table 9-1 added to present additional performance measures.
Figure IX-2 is now Figure 9-1.
Table IX-1 is now Table 9-2. “Percent of Total” column added to depict which causes are the most common on average.
Figure IX-1 is now Figure 9-2.
Attachment 2
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan Change Log
April 2025
www.hydroscience.com
Element #
Section #
(2020)
Element #
Section #
(2025)
Description of Change/Revision
Element X Element 10 Element title updated to “Internal Audits” per new General Order.
Element X
C. Audits
El
ement 10
10.1 Audits
De
tails of the SSMP audits updated to reflect the latest audit template submitted in 2024. Timeline for audits updated to every 3 years per the General Order
Discussion added about audit submission process to CIWQS per General Order requirements. - Element 10
10.3 Annual Reports
Section added detailing the requirements for annual reports to be submitted by the City.
Element XI
C. Communication
du
ring SSMP
Development and
Implementation
El
ement 11
11.1 Communication
wi
th the Public
Di
scussion of approval of 2020 SSMP added.
Link added to the location of the SSMP posted on the City’s website.
Reference to Bay Area Stormwater Agencies Association (BASMAA) updated to new organization called Bay Area Municipal Stormwater Collaborative (BAMSC)
- Element 11
11.2 Communication
wi
th Connected
Systems
Subsection added to address new requirements in the General Order.
Attachment 2
www.hydroscience.com
APPENDIX 10B
City of Sunnyvale
Sewer System Management Plan
SSMP Formal Adoption Documents
Attachment 2