Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Sutter Creek City Council
November 20, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
November 20, 2023
Body
Sutter Creek City Council
Pages
3
Original file
11.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.cityofsuttercreek.org. That file is the official record.

CITY COUNCIL A G E N D A
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2023
7:00 P.M. Regular Session
33 Church Street, Sutter Creek CA 95685
The Agenda can be found on the City’s Website: www.cityofsuttercreek.org

THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE AVAILABLE VIA ZOOM AND IN PERSON.

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9568520224
Please note: Zoom participation is only available for viewing the Council meeting. *Public comment will not be taken from Zoom.*
or
Dial by phone:
301-715-8592
Meeting ID: 956 852 0224
Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065. 6:30 P.M.

1. CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Gov. Code Section 54956.9) SEIU Local 1021 v. City of Sutter Creek, California Pub. Emp. Rel. Bd.

No. SA-CE-1244-M
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Gov. Code Section 54956.9) Van Der Veen v. City of Sutter Creek, Amador Sup. Ct. Case No. 23CV13156

CALL TO ORDER AND ESTABLISH A QUORUM FOR REGULAR MEETING

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG

3. PRESENTATIONS
A. Introduction of Public Works Director Dan Lafontaine B. Introduction of Officer Alfonso Casias
C. Proclamation for Interim City Manager Sandra Spellicsy

4. PUBLIC FORUM
At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on items not appearing on the agenda.

Comments may not exceed 5 minutes. In accordance with State Law, however, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The City Council may respond to statements made or questions asked or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting on the matter. The exceptions under which the City Council may discuss and/or take action on items not appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code §54954.2. Public comment on any item listed below shall be limited to five minutes, unless additional time is permitted by the Mayor/Council.

5. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
This section is an opportunity to provide Council members with a brief status update on staff activities. No action is expected to be taken by the Council.

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Minutes of November 6, 2023.

Recommendation: By motion approve minutes as presented.

7. CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and shall be enacted in one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of Council or the Public.

A. Adopt Resolution 23-34-* Authorizing the execution of an exclusive easement across

16.25 square feet of City owned property located at 80 Eureka Street (APN 018-180- 031-000) for ingress and egress in favor of the owners of the property located at 101 Eureka Street (APN018-190-002-000) and finding the proposed action exempt under the “common sense” exemption of the California Environmental Quality Act.

8. ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARING
A. Waive the second reading in full and enact Ordinance No.______ Amending Sections 2.06 & 2.08 of the Sutter Creek Municipal Code.

9. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
A. Action Item – Authorize Staff Work on a Self-Help Tax Initiative

10. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
This section is to provide Council members an opportunity to present updates on their activities and to request items be placed on future agendas.

11. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
This section provides an opportunity for the City Attorney to report on any activities or upcoming legislation of importance to the City. No action is expected to be taken by the Council

12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This section provides an opportunity for Council members to request items to be added to the agenda in the future with a majority Council vote.

13. INFORMATION/CORRESPONDENCE
A. Monthly Police Report
B. Monthly Public Works Report
C. Monthly Building Report
D. Treasurer’s Report
E. Monthly Administrative Services Report
F. Monthly Finance Department Report
G. Warrants- Oct.30th & Nov 6th &20th, 2023
H. Monthly Engineer’s Report
I. Monthly Planning Report
J. Public Communications

ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled meeting is MONDAY, DECEMBER 4th at 7:00 P.M Please note the first meeting in January, January 2 is cancelled.

A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK

RECOGNIZING INTERIM CITY MANAGER SANDY SPELLISCY AND HONORING HER

MANY ACCOMPLISHMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK WHEREAS, Interim City Manager Sandy Spelliscy was appointed Interim City Manager on March 8, 2023; and
WHEREAS, Sandy’s tenure began without the benefit of much introduction or onboarding. She demonstrated exemplary resourcefulness and ingenuity in navigating where the city was currently positioned in several matters; and
WHEREAS, Sandy’s deep background and experience enabled her to identify a myriad of decisions and opportunities that required reassessment and prioritization; and WHEREAS, from day one Sandy put the overall benefit to the citizens of Sutter Creek above all else when making recommendations to council; and
WHEREAS, Sandy reached out to other agencies in the county and the state to establish, re-establish and affirm relationships in order to ensure Sutter Creek’s needs and interests are considered; and WHEREAS, Sandy was resolved to make certain all members of the council had access to information in order to make policy decisions for the city; and
WHEREAS, Sandy began budget work immediately upon her appointment. The draft budget was presented to the council and public for review and input at multiple workshops and hearings for the first time in many years. A balanced budget was approved within the deadline that includes a significant road and sewer collection project, also for the first time in many years; and WHEREAS, Sandy picked up the ball on major projects that were funded by grants and subject to strict timelines. The required updates to the zoning code were completed and approved in time for all work to be reimbursed by LEAP grants. She worked with the water board to review the scope and extend the deadline for the sewer master plan critical to the city; and WHEREAS, while it was not intended nor included in her contract, Sandy also served as the General Manager of the Amador Regional Sanitation Authority (ARSA), a joint powers agency responsible for conveyance and disposal of wastewater from the City’s wastewater treatment plant. Sandy’s extensive research and thorough direct communications to the board unraveled four decades of the ARSA web leaving the board and agency partners with a clear picture of where the agency sits today; and WHEREAS, Sandy applied her knowledge and resourcefulness in order to steady the operations of the city and leave the council and the public informed of immediate and long-term opportunities and challenges. She’s left a much-improved foundation for the permanent city manager to continue the work.

We are deeply appreciative of her efforts and look forward to her enjoying her re-retirement in the city of Sutter Creek.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, I, Mayor Claire Gunselman, on behalf of the City Council, Citizens, and Employees of the City of Sutter Creek, do hereby issue this Proclamation to Sandy Spelliscy in recognition of her many achievements and extends its sincerest gratitude and appreciation.

THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK
______________________
Claire Gunselman, Mayor

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2023
THIS MEETING WAS CONDUCTED IN-PERSON AT 33 CHURCH STREET, THE PUBLIC WAS ABLE TO VIEW FROM HOME:

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9568520224
6:00 P.M. 1. CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Gov. Code Section 54956.9) SEIU Local 1021 v. City of Sutter Creek, Pub. Emp. Rel. Bd. Case No. SA-CE-1244-M 7:00 P.M. 2. CALL TO ORDER AND ESTABLISH A QUORUM FOR REGULAR MEETING Council members present:

Feist, Riordan, Sierk, Swift and Gunselman
Vicky Runquist, City Treasurer
Staff Present:

Sandra Spelliscy, Interim City Manager
Derek Cole, City Attorney
Karen Darrow, Mason Peters and Matt Ospital

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG

4. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Cole reported that direction was given to staff and there was no reportable action.

5. PUBLIC FORUM
Jill Kelley noted her concern about the maintenance of the city, especially the flushing dam.

Richard Murphy requested that the parking areas near 35 Main St. could be repainted because cars are parking in no parking zones.

Bradley Booker asked if an ACTC Bike/Ped update could be added to an upcoming agenda and requested an estimate to have bike racks installed.

Mitchell Vinciguerra suggested that the city adopt labor standards that require contractors to offer healthcare to their employees.

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. City Council Minutes of October 16 & 30, 2023
Recommendation: By motion approve minutes as presented.

M/S Council member Sierk/Feist to approve the City Council Minutes of October 16, 2023, as amended.

AYES: Feist, Riordan, Sierk and Gunselman
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Swift
ABSENT: None

MOTION CARRIED
M/S Council member Sierk/Swift to approve the City Council Minutes of October 30, 2023, as presented.

AYES: Feist, Sierk, Swift and Gunselman
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Riordan
ABSENT: None

MOTION CARRIED

7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Sutter Oaks sewer collection project
Recommendation: Approve the low Base Bid and Additive Alternate #1 Bid from Soracco, Inc. and award the Contract.

M/S Council member Riordan/Sierk to Adopt Resolution 23-24-14 Approve the low Base Bid and Additive Alternate #1 Bid from Soracco, Inc. and award the Contract.

AYES: Feist, Riordan, Sierk, Swift and Gunselman
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

MOTION CARRIED

8. ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARING
A. Introduce and Waive First Reading of Ordinance No. _____Amending Sections 2.06 &

2.08 of the Sutter Creek Municipal Code.

M/S Council member Riordan/Feist to Introduce and Waive First Reading of Ordinance No. _____Amending Sections 2.06 & 2.08 of the Sutter Creek Municipal Code.

AYES: Feist, Riordan, Sierk, Swift and Gunselman
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

MOTION CARRIED

9. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
A. Oro Madre Way Street Improvements- discussion and possible action City Engineer Matt Ospital presented an update highlighting the prosed improvements.

Council member Swift noted that the School District uses the gate access at the field maybe they would want to participate in the repairs in the areas they use.

Mayor Gunselman suggested that the drain near the baseball field might be another area that the School district could help with.

Council member Sierk asked about adding pedestrian access.

Interim City Manager clarified that this is considered ongoing maintenance and not an improvement project and that the safe Route to Schools program might be an option to pursue.

Council member Feist suggested that once the road is repaired it may become a safety risk with people speeding.

City Engineer Ospital noted that there are several traffic calming options, but they are all very costly.

The Council directed staff to investigate working with the school district on repairs near the gate access and the drain near the baseball field and move forward with sending the project to bid.

B. FY 23-24 Q1 Expense/Revenue Analysis- for information only.

Finance Supervisor Mason Peters presented the budget vs actual update for the first quarter.

Mason Peters explained that Fund 10 is further behind than last year and he is looking into the reason and the Cemetery percentages may be off and being overburdened and will be looking into that as well.

C. Adopt Resolution 23-24-* Authorizing the Execution of the employment agreement for City Manager Services with Tom DuBois.

City Attorney Derek Cole gave a verbal account of the contract’s economic terms, noting the annual salary of $175,000.00 and outlining the additional details as listed in the contract.

Council member Swift apologized for not being able to attend the Council meeting on October 16th and expressed his disagreement with some of the provisions of the City Manager’s contract.

M/S Council member Sierk/Riordan to Adopt Resolution 23-24-15 Authorizing the Execution of the employment agreement for City Manager Services with Tom DuBois.

AYES: Feist, Riordan, Sierk and Gunselman
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Swift
ABSENT: None

MOTION CARRIED
D. Update on City/ARSA spray easement agreement – discussion and possible action Interim City Manager Spelliscy presented.

Council member Riordan asked if Tom DuBois would be attending the ARSA Board meetings moving forward.

Interim City Manager Spelliscy explained that the operations contract with ARSA allows the City Manager or their designer to act as the ARSA General Manager and that will be up to the new City Manager to decide.

Council member Swift noted that the ARSA Board members were going to their respective agencies to get direction regarding the loan forgiveness and will report back to the ARSA Board.

Mayor Gunselman suggested that funding tends to go to regional efforts and that the Water agency may want to take their seats on the ARSA Board back with the vacancies created by the outgoing Board of Supervisors.

10. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Council member Sierk attended Bike/Ped committee and suggested that an update from them be on a future agenda. She also noted that they are working on what they can do with the $40,000 from ACTC that can be used to support projects with the Bike/Ped committee and suggested that it could be used towards a bike rack installation project.

Council member Sierk also reported that she will be asking to have the contract renewal added to the ACRA agenda in December.

Council member Feist noted that the business association appointed a liaison to provide marketing information to the city.

Mayor Gunselman noted that the Sutter Creek Community Benefit Foundation met to discuss their strategic plan for the next ten years and identified one of their priorities as marketing the Grammar School for rentals.

11. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
Interim City Manager Spelliscy provided an update on:

Flushing Dam – work to remove the debris was scheduled for October 30th.Council member Swift noted that the work was delayed due to a death in the contractor’s family and expects it to resume shortly.

Response to citizen question about city maintenance- Staff is focused on city owned property and the city does not own the property along the creek. She noted that CalFire spent time cleaning up at the cemetery.

Meetings on Zoom- Some cities have had problems with public comment on zoom. Since we only allow public comment on zoom if a council member is participating remotely, we have not had similar problems.

Website – staff is working with Civic Plus on the city website conversion and expects it to go live soon. The status of the visit website will be for the new City Manager to decide.

Interim City Manager Spelliscy noted that this will be her last meeting as the City Manager and thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve the community.

12. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
A. Update on SB1439
City Attorney Cole provided an update on new legislation.

13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council member Sierk requested:
-Bike/Ped update
-Bike rack program
-Reconsider reimbursement for Jean Pinotti
Council requested:
-Radar sign locations

14. INFORMATION/CORRESPONDENCE
A. Public Communications
Mayor Gunsleman suggested looking into using the radar signs that the city has and how they can be used in this location.

Interim City Manager Spelliscy noted that the Planning Commission will be reviewing the Danco project at their next meeting and there are conditions included that would require traffic calming measures to be implemented.

15. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:29 p.m.
_________________________________
Claire Gunselman, Mayor
___________________________________
Karen Darrow, City Clerk

Date Approved:
4881-1592-9456.1 1
18 Main St., Sutter Creek, CA 95685 • Telephone: (209)267-5647 • Fax: (209)267-0639 • TTY: 711 The City of Sutter Creek is an equal opportunity service provider and employer

STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 2023
FROM: DEREK COLE, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SUTTER CREEK AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ACROSS 16.25 SQUARE FEET OF CITYOWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 80 EUREKA STREET (APN 018- 180-031-000) FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF THE
OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 EUREKA STREET
(APN 018-190-002-000) AND FINDING THE PROPOSED ACTION
EXEMPT UNDER THE “COMMON SENSE” EXEMPTION OF THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 23-34-* Authorizing the grant of the requested easement.

Background and Analysis
Byron Damiani, Jr. and Laura Hardcastle are the owners of 101 Eureka Street. This property, which is adjacent to the City-Owned Knight Foundry Property, had at one time been the site of a home and an artist studio. The current owners have previously advised City staff they may use the property for some type of outdoor venue. They have previously applied to the City for a conditional use permit.

There is evidence that a small portion of the Foundry property was historically crossed at some times for access into and out of the 101 Eureka Street property. But when the Property Owners’ request for an easement was first brought to my attention, I determined—based on the available records I could review—the Owners’ predecessors never established any easement under any implied, prescriptive, or equitable theory the City would be required to recognize. In my review, it appeared that any access was sporadic, limited to times well in the past, and was likely allowed with the permission of the former Knight Foundry owners.

The City, however, may voluntarily grant the owners an express easement to formalize the access point into and out of their property. To this end, the City Council considered granting an easement at a meeting this summer. A number of issues were raised in that Item 7A
4881-1592-9456.1 2
18 Main St., Sutter Creek, CA 95685 • Telephone: (209)267-5647 • Fax: (209)267-0639 • TTY: 711 The City of Sutter Creek is an equal opportunity service provider and employer meeting that required that I follow up at a future meeting. The following describes how these issues were addressed
Legal Description. A key issue raised previously was what area should be granted, and how should this area be legally described? The answer to this question raised the separate question of whether the City’s interest in Eureka Street, which traverses its Foundry Property, “merged” into the City’s underlying ownership (“fee”) interest. Based on my review of California court decisions, the answer is there was no merger. The reason is that a dedicated roadway is not a typical easement. It is an interest a city holds in trust for the benefit of the public. Because of the unique nature of a dedicated roadway easement, that easement cannot “merge” into a public agency’s fee interest.

In light of this determination, the proposed easement uses a different legal description than proposed previously. This legal description was prepared by representatives of the Knight Foundry and forwarded to me by former Councilmember Peters. I have reviewed the legal description as to form and believe it is appropriate to use. The previously provided legal description, presented by the property owners, describes a broader easement that would encroach into the dedicated Eureka Street right of way. For that reason, I cannot recommend we use it.

Form of Easement. Relatedly, I have included a different form for the easement consistent with easements my law firm has drafted for other public agencies. This form recognizes the easement holders’ rights to maintain and use an easement for automobile access purposes. The language is narrowly crafted to ensure that the use of the easement is limited to these purposes.

City Access of its Public Utility Easement. The easement expressly reserves the City’s right to access the public utility easement over which the easement would be granted.

Exclusivity. Representatives of the Foundry have expressed concern that the easement, as previously proposed, would be exclusive. That means the grantees would have the exclusive right to exclude persons other than they and their guests and invitees from using the very small triangular easement area. I understand this concern, but believe that an exclusive easement is the only viable option. Because of the very small size of the easement and its location immediately adjacent to Eureka Street, I do not see any impact on the Foundry property from granting such exclusivity. Without exclusivity, moreover, it would be possible to park cars on the easement in a way that would defeat its existence.

Entitlement Process. The travelled surface of Eureka Street is less wide than the 30-foot width of the right-of-way for the road. Granting the easement itself would not excuse the property owners from improving the connection between their property and this travelled surface as part of any entitlement process they may pursue for their property. Nor would the granting of the easement excuse them from securing any encroachment permit they may be required to obtain in association with any discretionary approval they secure. 4881-1592-9456.1 3
18 Main St., Sutter Creek, CA 95685 • Telephone: (209)267-5647 • Fax: (209)267-0639 • TTY: 711 The City of Sutter Creek is an equal opportunity service provider and employer Fiscal Impact
There is no general fiscal impact with the granting and long-term usage of the proposed easement.

The resolution authorizing the execution of the resolution would, however, require the easement recipients to reimburse the City for all administrative, engineering, legal, and other costs associated with the consideration and review of the proposed easement as a condition for its execution.

RESOLUTION 23-24-*

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN EXLUSIVE EASEMENT ACROSS 16.25 SQUARE FEET OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 80 EUREKA STREET (APN 018-180-031-000) FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 EUREKA STREET (APN 018-190-002-000) AND FINDING THE PROPOSED ACTION EXEMPT UNDER THE “COMMON SENSE” EXEMPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHEREAS, the City of Sutter Creek (“City”) is the owner in fee of the real property located at 80 Eureka Street (Assessor Parcel No. 018-180-031-000), which is the site of the Historic Knight Foundry (“City Property”); and
WHEREAS, Byron Damiani Jr and Laura Hardcastle (“Grantees”) are the owners in fee of 110 Eureka Street (APN 018-190-002-000); and
WHEREAS, the Grantees have requested an easement over a small, triangular portion of the City Property to allow for ingress and egress into their property; and WHEREAS, the requested ingress and egress will allow the Grantees, their guests and invitees to use a triangular area of 16.25 square feet to access Eureka Street, a publicly maintained City street; and
WHEREAS, Eureka Street, the dedication for which the City has accepted, traverses through the City Property; and
WHEREAS, the right of way for Eureka Street traversing the City Property did not merge with the City’s underlying fee interest in the City upon the City’s acquisition of the property (City of Los Angeles v. Fiske (1953) 117 Cal.App.2d 167, 172); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that granting the requested exclusive easement would not be contrary to its interests as the owner of the City Property in that the area of the easement granted is immediately adjacent to Eureka Street, is de minimis in area, is not necessary to support or promote the historic Knight Foundry use located on the City Property, and has historically been used to allow access to the Grantee property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the granting of the requested easement is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under the “common sense” exemption in that it can be determined with certainty the project would have or create no adverse environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to grant the requested easement in the form attached to this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, nothing about the granting of the requested easement would excuse the Grantees from compliance with any conditions to improve the connection between their property and the travelled surface of Eureka Street, as may be imposed as part of any discretionary approval they seek and/or included in any encroachment permit they would be required to obtain.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Sutter Creek hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute the Easement Agreement for Grant of Ingress and Egress, as attached as Attachment A to this Resolution, which agreement, following full execution, shall be recorded in the Official Records of the County of Amador.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the foregoing easement may not be executed unless and until the Grantees have, in the determination of the City Manager, reimbursed the City for all its reasonable administrative, legal, engineering, and other expenses associated with the review of the easement.

The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Sutter Creek on the 20
th day of November 2023 by the following vote.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:
____________________________________
Claire Gunselman, Mayor
______________________________________
Karen Darrow, City Clerk

EASEMENT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK ("Grantor') does hereby GRANT to LAURA J. HARDCASTLE AND BYRON D. DAMIANI JR. ("Grantees") the following easement:

An exclusive easement over and across that real property situated in the City of Sutter Creek, County of Amador, State of California, specifically described in Exhibits “A” and “B,” as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Such easement shall include, without limitation, the right and privilege of the Grantees and their employees, agents, representatives, contractors, subcontractors, and workers to:
(i) perform all activities as may be necessary to facilitate the purposes of the easement; (ii) use, control and occupy the easement area, including by paving or otherwise developing the surface of the easement in a manner sufficient to allow for the passage of automobile traffic; (iii) have access to, ingress to, and egress from the easement; (iv) use and temporarily place and operate tools, equipment, machinery and materials within the easement area for the purposes of improving or maintaining the easement for automobile passage; and (v) trim, cut, remove, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora, including the roots thereof, located within the easement area.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this easement shall preclude or prevent the Grantor for exercising any right necessary to access, maintain, or repair the separate, dedicated public utility easement the Grantor possesses in and underneath the easement area.

GRANTOR GRANTEES
By: Claire Gunselman By: Laura J. Hardcastle
Its: Mayor
By: Byron D. Damiani, Jr.

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE IS FOR RECORDER’S USE

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

Laura J. Hardcastle and Byron D. Damiani Jr.

P.O. Box 1574
Sutter Creek, CA 95685
APN: 018-180-031-000

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

FOR ACCESS EASEMENT

AN EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER AND ACROSS ADJUSTED PARCEL 3 – 0.473 ACRES – PER “RECORD OF SURVEY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR CARL & ELEANOR BORGH” FILED IN THE RECORDER’S OFFICE IN BOOK 49 OF MAPS AND PLATS AT PAGE 87, AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 6N., RANGE 11E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.

See Exhibit “B”
COMMENCING at the Northeast Corner of the above said Adjusted Parcel 3 Thence: along the East Line of the above said Adjusted Parcel 3, South 00 Degrees 23 Minutes 51 Seconds East,

30.15 Feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
Thence: continuing along the East Line of the above said Adjusted Parcel 3, South 00 Degrees 23 Minutes 51 Seconds East, 3.25 Feet to a point,
Thence: North 74 Degrees 00 Minutes 08 Seconds West, 10.42 Feet to a point, Thence: North 87 Degrees 50 Minutes 08 Seconds East, 10.00 Feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Area: 16.25 Square Feet.

N EXHIBIT "B"
18 Main St., Sutter Creek, CA 95685 • Telephone: (209)267-5647 • Fax: (209)267-1655 • TTY: 711 The City of Sutter Creek is an equal opportunity service provider and employer ______________________________________________________________________________

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 2023
FROM: DEREK COLE, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO SCMC CHAPTERS 2.06 AND 2.08
RECOMMENDATION:

Waive the second reading in full and enact Ordinance No.______ Amending Sections 2.06 &

2.08 of the Sutter Creek Municipal Code.

BACKGROUND:

The Council has previously discussed the need to update Chapter 2.06 of the municipal code in order to reflect the current practice of employing a city manager instead of a city administrator as the city’s chief administrative officer, and that the city operates under a Council/Manager form of government. The change to Chapter 2.08 is to codify that the city clerk is a city employee who reports to the city manager, and is not appointed by the Council.

DISCUSSION:

As the city contemplates hiring a new permanent city manager, it is important that the municipal code contain an accurate description of the job and its duties, as well as the governance structure of the city and the city council/city manager relationship. Without these changes, there is a conflict between the job that was advertised and offered and what is contained in the municipal code. The proposed amendments are primarily language changes, with substantive changes proposed that reflect current practices or that are necessary to allow for efficient city operations.

BUDGET IMPACT:

None
ATTACHMENTS:

Proposed changes to SCMC Chapters 2.06 and 2.08.
1 ORDINANCE NO____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 2.06 AND AMENDING SECTION 2.08.010

OF THE SUTTER CREEK MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING

THE OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER
The City Council of the City of Sutter Creek, California does ordain asfollows:

Section 1
Chapter 2.06 of the Sutter Creek Municipal Code is repealed and reenacted as follows:

Chapter 2.06 CITY MANAGER

2.06.010 Office created.

The office of the city manager of the city is created and established. The city manager shall be appointed by the city council solely on the basis of his/her executive and administrative qualifications.

She/he shall hold office pursuant to a contract entered into between the city and the city manager. The City of Sutter Creek operates under a council/manager form of government wherein the city council is responsible for setting city policy and the annual budget, and the manager is responsible for implementing that policy and guiding city expenditures in accordance with the budget priorities.

Whenever a reference is made to "city administrator" or "city director," in this Code or in any other preexisting ordinance, resolution or action, that reference shall be deemed to mean "city manager" within the meaning of this Chapter.

2.06.020 Administrative head of city.

The city manager shall be the administrative head of the city government. She/he reports directly to the full city council and receives direction therefrom, but is not responsible to any individual council member. The manager shall have authority, including hiring, discipline and termination, over all department heads, employees, and all contract and professional employees, with the exception of the city attorney.

2.06.030 Powers and duties.

The city manager shall be responsible for the efficient administration of all the affairs of the city that are under his/her control. In addition to those general powers as administrative head, and not as a limitation thereon, it shall be his/her duty and she/he shall have the powers set forth as follows:

A. Enforcement. It shall be the duty of the city manager to enforce all laws and ordinances of the city and to see that all franchises, contracts, permits and privileges granted by the city council are faithfully observed.

B. Authority Over Employees. It shall be the duty of the city manager and she/he shall have the authority to control, order and give directions to all heads of departments and 2 to subordinate officers, employees, and all contracted and professional employees of the city under his/her jurisdiction, including hiring, discipline and termination.

C. Administrative Organization of Offices. It shall be the duty and responsibility of the city manager to organize the department structure and scheduling of all employees in order to promote the efficient, effective and economical conduct of the city's business.

D. Ordinances. It shall be the duty of the city manager to recommend to the city council for adoption such measures and ordinances as she/he deems necessary.

E. Financial Reports. It shall be the duty of the city manager to keep the city council at all times fully advised as to the financial condition and needs of the city.

F. Budget. It shall be the duty of the city manager to prepare and submit the proposed annual budget to the city council. The manager shall also propose an annual salary schedule for current and anticipated employees for the city, and shall be responsible for representing the city in negotiating the collective bargaining agreements with the city’s employee associations. Final approval of both budget and employee negotiations requires majority approval of the city council.

G. Purchasing Agent. It shall be the duty of the city manager to oversee the purchase of all supplies, equipment, services and other needs for all departments and divisions of the city in accordance with the city’s adopted budget and the city’s purchasing policy.

H. Investigations and Complaints. It shall be the duty of the city manager to make investigations into the affairs of the city and any department or division thereof, and the performance of any contract or other obligation of the city. Further, it shall be the duty of the city manager to investigate all complaints in relation to matters concerning the administration of the city government, unless the council delegates the investigation to another entity.

I. Signatures. The city manager shall have the same authority as the mayor to sign documents as specified in Section 40602 of the California Government Code, whenever such documents have been approved by the city council for execution.

Additionally, the city manager shall have the authority to sign on behalf of the city, without council review, routine authorizations so long as the execution is for the purpose of implementing an existing city policy, regulation, or approval. Only the city manager and the mayor shall be authorized to approve agreements on behalf of the city unless execution by another officer is expressly required by state or federal law.

2.06.040 Additional agreements.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as a limitation on the power or authority of the city council to enter into any supplemental agreement with the city manager delineating additional terms and conditions of employment not inconsistent with any provisions of this chapter. 3 2.06.050 Meetings.

A. Attendance. The city manager shall attend all meetings of the city council unless excused by the mayor or the city council, except when his/her employment, discipline or removal is under consideration by the city council. The city manager may attend any or all meetings of the planning commission, or any other commissions, boards or committees created by the council. While in attendance, she/he shall inform members of any matter being considered by the council within the jurisdiction of the body, and shall cooperate to the fullest extent with the members of all commissions, boards or committees appointed by the council.

B. Discussions. The city manager may take part in council discussions but may not vote.

She/he shall have the power to appear and address the council or any of its boards or commissions at any meeting.

C. Recommendations. The city manager, with the assistance of the city clerk, shall assemble the agenda packet for all regular, special and emergency city council meetings, and shall make reports or recommendations on agenda items for consideration as necessary or as requested by the city council.

2.06.060 Personnel.

A. Appointments. The city manager shall select qualified candidates to fill staff vacancies occurring within the city or to fill newly created positions.

B. Dismissal. The city manager shall approve the dismissal or suspension of any city employee with appropriate documentation and after following the processes set forth in the city’s personnel manual or any applicable collective bargaining agreement.

C. Performance Evaluations. The city manager is responsible to see that all city staff receive an annual performance evaluation. Department heads will evaluate their staff, with the final approval of the city manager regarding step increases, pay raises, performance bonuses, etc. The city manager's performance will be evaluated by the city council annually prior to any Council decisions regarding pay increases, benefit augmentations, etc. The city manager is responsible to audit and assure that all evaluations are consistent with the respective job descriptions as well as with all applicable city policies and procedures, and to conduct independent evaluations as she/he deems necessary. All evaluations will be discussed with the respective employees prior to becoming part of the personnel record.

D. General Supervision. The city manager shall be responsible for the overall supervision of all employees and for the day-to-day operations of the city.

2.06.070 Expenses.

The city manager shall be reimbursed for all actual and necessary expenses incurred by him/her in the performance of his/her official duties, including those incurred when traveling on business 4 pertaining to the city, pursuant to the city’s personnel policy manual. The council may require preauthorization of expenses in certain circumstances.

2.06.080 Compensation.

The salary and other benefits for the city manager shall be established by the council, agreed to by contract, and shall be reviewed immediately following the city manager’s annual performance evaluation. Such salary and benefits are to be independent of any salary or benefits negotiated for the benefit of other city employees unless so stated in the city manager’s contract.

2.06.090 Dismissal; Disability; Resignation; Exemption; Exception.

The city manager may be dismissed by the city council, with or without cause at any time for any reason or no reason. Ordinarily the Council shall give the city manager 30 days prior written notice of his/her dismissal, but this requirement may be waived by the council upon the finding of extraordinary circumstances that require immediate dismissal. The removal of the city manager shall be made by either a four-fifths vote of council if the dismissal is without cause, or a majority vote of the whole council in the instance of a “for cause” dismissal.

A. Removal For Cause. "For cause” is defined as any facts which the Council determines would constitute the basis for a serious disciplinary infraction. "For cause" includes, but is not limited to:

1. Fraud in securing employment;

2. Incompetence;

3. Inexcusable neglect of duty;

4. Insubordination;

5. Dishonesty;

6. Being under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance while on duty;

7. Inexcusable absence without leave;

8. Conviction of a felony or misdemeanor that is of such a nature as to adversely affect the employee's ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the city manager's position. A plea of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere is deemed to be a conviction with the meaning of this section;

9. A finding of unlawful discrimination, including harassment, on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or age, against the public or other employees while acting in the capacity of city manager.

10. Material breach of the employment agreement.
5 B. Disability Termination. If the city manager shall, for whatever reason, become incapable of performing any of the essential functions of the position, even with reasonable accommodation by the city, either (1) permanently, or (2) for a period exceeding the period of leave available to the Employee under the Family Medical Leave Act or the California Family Rights Act (if qualifying), or accrued sick leave, whichever is longer, then Employee shall be deemed to have suffered a disability. As the city manager position requires him/her to devote a great deal of time both during and outside of normal office hours to the business of the city, the city manager acknowledges and agrees that granting a leave longer than the time period stated in this section shall constitute an undue hardship on the city. In accordance with applicable law, any request for leave that constitutes an undue hardship shall be grounds for “for cause” termination.

C. Hearing. Within three days after the delivery to the city manager of a notice of dismissal for cause, the city manager may, by written notification to the city clerk, request a hearing before the city council regarding its reasons for dismissal. The city council shall schedule a meeting to discuss the dismissal with the city manager within fourteen days of receipt of the written notice. The city council is under no obligation to take a particular action or any action during or after the conclusion the hearing.

D. Suspension Pending Hearing. After furnishing the city manager with written notice of an intended dismissal, the city council may suspend him/her from duty, but his/her compensation shall continue until the removal date set by the city council.

E. Resignation. The city manager shall give the city council thirty days prior written notice of his/her resignation from the position.

F. Exemption. The city manager is an exempt employee under the terms of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, and shall not be represented by an association of, or an agent for, employees under his/her supervision, or any other employee association.

G. Exception. The city council shall not terminate the city manager’s employment without cause within 90 days prior to or after a municipal election for city council seats, or an election for the recall of a sitting council member or members. If the employment contract renewal date falls within this 180-day period, this prohibition does not apply to non-renewal of the employment contract.

Section 2
Section 2.08.010 of the Sutter Creek Municipal Code is amended as follows:

2.08.010 - Employee.

The city clerk shall be an employee of the City of Sutter Creek and serve under the direction of the city manager.

Section 3
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. 6 Section 4
The City Council determines that the provisions of this Ordinance are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the instant ordinance involves continuing administrative activities and thus is not a project, as the Act defines, pursuant to Section 15378(b)(2) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. To the extent the adoption of this Ordinance constitutes a project, the City Council finds pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) that the project is exempt from environmental review because it can be seen with certainty that the adoption of the ordinance would not have any significant impact on the environment.

This ordinance shall be published and posted in the manner required by law by the City Clerk.

Introduced at a meeting of the City Council of Sutter Creek on November 6, 2023, and enacted by the City Council of the City of Sutter Creek at a regular meeting held on November 20, 2023.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Sutter Creek City Council, held on this 20th day of November 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Claire Gunselman, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Karen Darrow, City Clerk
18 Main St., Sutter Creek, CA 95685 • Telephone: (209)267-5647 • Fax: (209)267-1655 • TTY: 711 The City of Sutter Creek is an equal opportunity service provider and employer ______________________________________________________________________________

STAFF REPORT
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: NOV 20, 2023
FROM: TOM DUBOIS, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE STAFF WORK ON SELF HELP TAX INITIATIVE REPORT TYPE: ACTION ITEM
RECOMMENDATION:

1. Staff recommends that the City Council review, provide comments and direct staff to begin work on a potential revenue generating ballot measure. Council should determine:
a. Should staff purse a local tax, yes/ no?
b. If yes, should staff to develop a sales tax measure, a Utility Use tax measure, or both? i. If interested in a utility use tax, which utilities? ii. Interested in exemptions for people based on certain characteristics? c. Additional feedback on priority uses of additional funding d. Initial feedback on general tax vs a specific tax
Item 9A
2 SUMMARY:

The City has worked to structurally balance its long-term revenues against increasing expenses but currently expenses are increasing more rapidly than revenue. Financial sustainability is a top priority.

We can either cut costs or increase revenue. Cutting expenses would reduce the City’s capabilities and services it provides to residents. Because staffing levels are currently near the minimum required to perform the City’s basic functions, we are proposing we begin work on a tax ballot measure for Nov. 2024 to increase revenue. This report explores increasing revenue through either a sales tax, a user utility tax or both. Based on your feedback tonight, staff will begin to execute the work plan outlined here. You are not committed to a ballot measure tonight, simply giving some direction and authorizing staff to do more research - Council will have several opportunities to check-in and give additional direction.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Sutter Creek has increasing financial needs City revenue has strained to keep up with increased costs and the City is going to find it increasingly difficult to meet its municipal duties. Employee salaries and benefit costs such as health care continue to increase while our primary revenue sources - property tax, sales tax, and TOT have not kept pace.

One way cities balance their budget is by deferring infrastructure maintenance and replacing capital assets. Sutter Creek needs to advance multiple infrastructure projects but doesn’t have enough funds in capital reserves to do so.

One example - we have deferred road maintenance to balance the budget but this is catching up to us.

As the Council saw back in the “2015 Pavement Management Study” (appendix B), our roads are below state average with an average pavement condition index (PCI) of 59. We have a dozen streets at PCI of 25 or lower, essentially failed streets. Deferring maintenance causes road conditions to worsen, resulting in higher costs in the long term than a solid maintenance program done consistently over time.

It also causes higher maintenance costs on our residents' vehicles. The City needs $8.4M to increase our PCI to 75 over 9 years (based on the 2015 estimates).

We have a large capital need to rebuild and modernize our waste water treatment plant. Because of the scale of that project, it is expected it will need to be funded by a combination of grants and low-interest loans. Some of these programs will require some funding from the city as well as funds for planning.

Bolstering the general fund in advance of that project will insure we are in solid financial condition to get good loan terms and that other city activities are well managed, freeing up staff capacity to work on the treatment plant project. If the council chooses, it can begin to build up capital infrastructure reserves with additional revenue.

Public safety salaries and benefits also continue to increase. Public safety makes up more than 44% of our annual budget, and is one of the most basic functions a city must provide. Additional revenue will help ensure our police department is well funded and well equipped.

Initial estimates are that we could generate up to $900,000 a year with a local sales tax and $400,000 a year with a Utility use tax. With Council’s direction, staff will develop more detailed analysis to quantify potential revenue and priority uses.
3 Current City Revenue
(Non-tax revenue includes everything outside of taxes such as grants, fees for services, fines, and permits)
No Increase in TOT - The City recently raised the TOT, and does not have a lot of hotel beds, so while some additional info on TOT is included below, staff is not suggesting raising the TOT at this time. The City should explore ways to attract more hotels within City boundaries and ensure it is collecting all TOT on Airbnb and other short term rentals.

No Increase in Business Tax - The business tax could be updated to generate more revenue. However, given the number of businesses and recent impacts from Covid19, we are recommending Council focus on Sales Tax and User Utility Tax at this time.

Current Taxation Status
Attached at the end of this report are several appendices with additional background information.

Attachment A is a more comprehensive list of options for raising local revenue. Attachment B is a Jan 2020 Staff Report to Council on a County proposed half cent Sales Tax Measure. Attachments C, D and E show taxation levels in California for Sales Tax, TOT, and Utility User taxes respectively. Attachment F is the Pavement Management Report from 2015.

SALES TAX
The state base sales tax is currently 7.25 percent and Amador County has a local County sales tax of 0.5 percent to fund the fire district, for a total sales tax of 7.75 percent in Amador County. There is a total 4 cap of 2.0% for local taxes by cities and the County. If the County were to raise a local tax (see Attachment B for an example of a past proposal), it could limit the amount Sutter Creek could raise.

Throughout the state of California, over 176 cities and 32 counties have voter approved local sales and use taxes in addition to the state base rate. There are only 47 cities and 26 county unincorporated areas that are at the base 7.25 percent rate. Sales tax varies widely throughout the state. Some Counties even have exceptions to exceed the 2% cap on local sales tax. The highest rate is 10.75% in cities such as Hayward, San Leandro, Alameda, Union City, Fremont and about 10 other cities.

Attachment C provides tax rates throughout the state.

UTILITY USE TAX
A Utility User Tax (UUT) may be imposed by a city on the consumption of utility services, including (but not limited to) electricity, gas, water, sewer, telephone (including cell phone), sanitation and cable TV. Some cities are even considering a user tax on internet and video streaming services. Tax is collected by the utility as part of its regular billing and remitted to the city. 150 cities and four counties (Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Francisco) levy utility user taxes; most residents and businesses in the state pay UUT.

UUT is quite flexible and can be a different rate for each type of utility. A city can choose to charge a use tax for one or more utilities. Almost every combination exists throughout the state and rates range from 1 to 11% of the utility bill. The average is 5.4%. UUTs can also specify that they apply only to commercial utility customers, residential or both. On average UUT provides 15% of general fund revenue in cities that levy it, a significant source of income.

California Utility User Taxes as of 1/1/2021
Cities Counties
Special
District* Total
Calif Population
covered
Number with UUT 158 4 1 163 54.0%
Telephone UUTs 150 4 0 154 49.5%
Electricity 156 4 1 161 52.7%
Gas 156 4 1 161 52.7%
Cable TV 92 1 0 93 22.8%
Water 85 1 1 87 24.7%
Sewer 14 1 1 16 2.7%
Garbage 13 0 1 14 1.3%
Telecommunications UUTs have evolved the most over time, as services have changed rapidly. Care must be taken in drafting the ordinance to account for future technology shifts.

Currently no city in Amador county has a utility user tax. 5 Highest Utility User Tax $ Collections
City
UUT per
capita City
UUT per
capita
El Segundo $ 710.92 Santa Cruz $ 175.02
Richmond $ 415.68 Malibu $ 173.84
Sand City $ 372.97 Benicia $ 173.30
Santa Fe Springs $ 356.90 Los Alamitos $ 167.87
Culver City $ 327.92 Burbank $ 165.36
Santa Monica $ 302.44 Seal Beach $ 161.97
Emeryville $ 255.46 Los Angeles $ 150.09
Palo Alto $ 236.35 Santa Barbara $ 148.49
Sierra Madre $ 228.56 Palm Springs $ 145.30
Torrance $ 209.45 Hercules $ 133.55
Portola Valley $ 204.25 Glendale $ 129.22
Pasadena $ 184.42 Monterey $ 126.68
Source: Author's computations from FY 2018-19 data reported to the California State Controller. * Extreme outliers: Vernon reported $37,240/resident, Irwindale reported $2,612/resident.

The table above shows the cities charging the most UUT per capita. Attachment E provides UUT rates throughout the state. This may be misleading, as UUT for commercial users is averaged into the per capita numbers.

Other Considerations for Tax Measures

GENERAL OR SPECIFIC TAX
For either a sales tax or UUT, the Council must determine if it wants to put forth a General or Specific Tax. A General tax goes into the general fund. It can be accompanied by non-binding advisory language on intended use of funds. A General tax needs a simple majority to pass. A Specific tax is dedicated for a specific use. It must be approved by two thirds of the voters to pass. In either case, two thirds of the City Council must pass the ordinance proposing the tax.

Specific taxes pass at a rate of about 50%. City general taxes have a better success rate, passing about 76% of the time.

EXEMPTIONS
Sales tax exemptions are governed by the state. For example some nonprofits qualify for exemption from sales tax as well as resellers. Many UUTs typically exempt senior citizens receiving SSI benefits (some cities at 70 years old, some at 62). Sacramento exempts the first $45 of electricity and basic gas, but taxes 100% of cable TV.

GENERAL ELECTION
Tax measures must be voted on in general elections (not special elections)

IMPLEMENTATION DATE, SUNSETTING CLAUSE
Sales tax can begin the first day of the quarter 110 days after voter adoption. So with a November election, revenue will start being collected on April 1, the following year. A street listing will need to be established and maintained on our website for retailers to identify City boundaries subject to the tax. 6 UUT tax requires notification to the utility to implement collecting it on the user’s bill. Some staff will be required to handle people filing exemptions. A launch date is dependent on the utilities implementing the tax in their billing systems, but currently we think we could launch on a similar time frame, April 1, the year following voter adoption.

Council could have the tax end (sunset) at a certain date or be ongoing. Most of these taxes are passed without a sunset date.

CITY NEUTRALITY
Once Council passes an ordinance to be put before residents to vote, the city can only provide neutral information. Council members can’t campaign in their official capacity. Best case would be for a citizens group to form to support and campaign for it.
7 DISCUSSION
Staff would like to propose the EASE framework for Council to evaluate revenue generating options.

EQUITY Who does the tax impact and how is the impact felt across all residents or businesses in the same industry?
ADMINISTRABILITY How is the tax administered and what would be the cost of compliance on taxpayers and the City?
STABILITY What are the drivers of the tax revenue and how does the tax type in question affect the volatility of the revenue over time (including
potential recessionary or modernization scenarios)?

ECONOMIC

BENEFITS
Is the tax efficient, promotes economic development objectives and minimize disruption on the taxpayer?
It’s important that we consider who will be impacted by a tax. The cost to implement is also a key factor, some taxes, like a complicated business tax, could require the city to hire people just to administer and collect the tax. Stability is important - we don’t want all of the city's revenue to be highly susceptible to an economic downtown, or be susceptible to a shift away from using a product or utility. Finally, are the economic benefits or ROI where we want it - we are taxing the taxpayer, are they benefiting from the result?
8 Sales Tax Analysis
EQUITY Only businesses selling goods are subject to sales tax, so it is equitable within an industry, but not across industries. Service industries are not subject to sales tax. Sales tax is widely considered to be an outdated tax structure and only applies to up to 40 percent of the economic base.

Sales tax is regressive, taking the heaviest financial toll (as a percentage of income) on those least able to pay.

ADMINISTRABILITY The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) can provide assistance with sample ordinances and they will administer the tax, minimizing work for City staff.

STABILITY Sales taxes vary with the economy and disposable income.

ECONOMIC

BENEFITS
It’s expected that the sales tax increase would initially impact mostly tourists, since many daily necessities are purchased outside Sutter Creek.

If other nearby cities followed Sutter Creek's example and also raised their sales tax, then it would apply to purchases of residents for everyday necessities. The benefits, such as improved roads, more city staff, improved wastewater treatment would directly benefit those paying the tax.

A sales tax of 0.25% would generate ~ $233,000 for Sutter Creek. A sales tax at the maximum rate of 1.0% would generate $932,000.
9 Utility User Tax Analysis
EQUITY Utility Use tax impacts those who consume the most utilities. It could be applied to both residential and commercial utility users.

ADMINISTRABILITY It appears this could be slightly more difficult to administer.

While the utilities collect the tax on the utility bill, the city would need to insure utilities are collecting the tax and provide a process for people to apply for exemptions.

STABILITY This revenue is affected primarily by electricity and natural gas price fluctuations, consumption patterns, energy conservation, and changes in government regulation. Additionally, job growth or layoffs can also significantly impact both the landline and cellular telephone components of this revenue.

ECONOMIC

BENEFITS
The benefits, such as improved roads, more city staff, improved wastewater treatment would directly benefit those paying the tax.

You could tax certain utilities more than others if you wanted to influence consumption. Many cities are imposing a higher utility use tax on natural gas for example.

More financial analysis needs to be done to estimate user utility taxes by utility type and by residential vs commercial. A top-level estimate of a 6% utility use tax on all utilities, assuming 1,387 Households in Sutter Creek with an average utility bill of $380/mo. for all utilities, would generate about $380,000 in City tax revenue. However, this does not consider commercial users. We recommend more detailed analysis be done if Council is interested in pursuing the utility use tax.
10 NEXT STEPS
This report is to give the Council a grounding in the revenue options and gauge interest in pursuing one, both, or neither tax to support much needed city programs, particularly maintenance of aging infrastructure.

It’s expected the Council would discuss details over a couple of meetings with additional financial analysis and community feedback. Frequent updates and feedback are required to meet the timing to have measures on the Nov 2024 ballot.

Proposed Schedule

SCHEDULE TASK
Nov 2023 Today’s Action Item to authorize further work
Jan 2023 Detailed needs analysis, revenue generation analysis, initial community outreach
Feb/March
2024
Polling, development ballot language
April 2024 Council approval of ordinance(s), Nov 2024 ballot measure and language June 2024 Ballot measure submitted to the County
Staff recommends that the City Council review, provide comments and direct staff to begin work on a potential revenue generating ballot measure. Council should determine:

A. Should staff purse a local tax, yes/ no?
B. If yes, should staff to develop a sales tax measure, a Utility Use tax measure, or both? a. If interested in a utility use tax, which utilities? b. Interested in exemptions for people based on certain characteristics? C. Additional feedback on priority uses of additional funding D. Initial feedback on general tax vs a specific tax
ENVIRONMENT REVIEW: This report is not a project for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Environmental review is not required. 11 ATTACHMENTS:

A. Options for Raising Local Revenue
B. Jan 21, 2020 Staff Report on County Half cent Tax Measure C. California Sales and Use Tax rates by County and City, 2023 D. California Transient Occupancy Taxes by County and City, 2020-2021 E. California Utility Users Taxes by County and City, 2020-2021 F. Pavement Management Program Update Report
12 Attachment A
Options for Raising Local Revenue
Cities have two main mechanisms for raising revenues: 1) taxes and 2) fees for services. The City of Sutter Creek has a Municipal Fee Schedule which should be reviewed annually as part of the budget process to ensure a robust span of fees and charges, including its franchise fees. In some cases, fees are designed to fully cover our cost of providing services. In other cases, fees are designed to pay part of the cost of providing services, with the balance provided by tax revenues.

Finally, some fees and charges can lawfully exceed our costs, providing excess revenues to help fund other programs and services to residents.

Cities can also impose taxes; however, adoption of, or changes to, those taxes must be approved by the voters in accordance with California law, including Propositions 218 and 26. For a general tax, a simple majority of votes cast (50% + 1 vote) is required for approval, while for a specific tax a 2/3 supermajority approval is required. By state law, cities may place a general tax before the voters only at a general municipal election, which is an election that includes open seats on the governing body. (The exception to this rule is a fiscal emergency declared unanimously by the governing body).

TAX REVENUE
Property Taxes
Property taxes are the largest revenue generator for the City of Sutter Creek, a total of $876k in 2021 (the most recent year of published audits when this was written). All taxable real and personal property is subject to a 1% basic tax of assessed value collected by local jurisdictions including the fire district and school districts for general service purposes. Due to Proposition 13, the effective property tax rate is only 0.49% of assessed value – less than half of the 1% basic tax.

Potential Property Tax Rate Change
Property taxes are regulated by state laws, including voter-approved constitutional provisions such as Proposition 13. Changing the rate itself is not within a municipality’s authority. However, cities can use mechanisms such as parcel taxes which are levies on parcels of property. Typically, these are set at some fixed amount per parcel or by square footage, and cannot be based on the value of a property. These levies can be based on lot square footage and or land use designation. Parcel taxes are usually special taxes requiring a 2/3 voter approval. Parcel taxes are levied on the property owner; however, property owners may pass on these costs to their tenants in the form of increased rent or more expensive leases.

Sales and Use Tax
Sales and Use Taxes are usually the second largest revenue generator for the City of Sutter Creek, raising $460K in General Fund revenue in FY2021. Sales Tax rates include state, regional, and local assessments. Currently, the tax rate in Amador County is 7.75 percent. This is the state tax rate of 7.25 percent and a local County Sales tax of 0.5 percent. The City and County receives 1.0 percent of the and in addition 0.25 percent goes to county transportation (for a total of 1.25 percent to the County).
13 Sales Tax revenues can fluctuate significantly depending on the overall state of the economy.

Potential Sales Tax Rate Change
The State of California caps local sales taxes levied by local jurisdictions at 2.0 percent, meaning the total percentage can be no greater than 9.25% (Some counties in CA have special exemptions to this limit). If the county were to raise their local sales tax, it could limit our ability to have a local city sales tax, if the total exceeded the cap. There is 1.5 percent left within the 2 percent cap.

Sales tax is equitable across businesses of the same industry, however, it does not apply to industries that are not subject to sales tax. Sales tax is widely considered to be an outdated tax structure and only applies to up to 40 percent of the economic base. This structure and the driver for it, disposable income, being a significant portion of this tax, it is subject to economic fluctuations as well as longer term fluctuations and the consumption of goods changes in society.

Transient Occupancy Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is the third largest tax revenue generator for the City of Sutter Creek, generating $206K in revenue in FY 2021. The Sutter Creek rate of 12% is applied to the daily rate charged by a hotel, motel, or other lodging establishment.

Potential Transient Occupancy Tax Rate Change
An increase in the TOT rate would primarily impact the visitor population.

Utility Users Tax
Sutter Creek currently has no Utility User Tax. For cities that do, UUT accounts on average for 15% of their general fund revenue, which would be more than our TOT revenue.

Potential Tax Rate Change
Sutter Creek would need to determine which utilities to impose the use tax on (could be all of them).

A rate of 6% would be average in the State.

Business Tax
Business license generated $62K in FY22. The business license tax is required for businesses located and / or who do business in the city. It is currently a flat fee of $174 Potential Tax Rate Change
Other cities in California have business taxes based on economic activity. Some options for units of measure include employee headcount, square footage used, and payroll expense. Council can exempt businesses by business type.
14 Documentary Transfer Tax
Documentary Transfer Tax is applied to the sale of real property as property ownership is transferred. The State of California has a standard base rate of $1.10 per $1,000 of sale price, of which the City and County split the proceeds 50/50 which applies to general law cities. Charter Cities are able to set their own rate.

OTHER FINANCING OPTIONS
General Obligation (GO) Bond
A common form of long-term capital project financing is the General Obligation (GO) bond. Cities can only issue GO bonds to pay for the acquisition and improvement of real property (California Constitution Article XIIIA). Under Article XIIIC of the State Constitution, City GO bonds require a favorable two-thirds supermajority vote of the registered voters that vote on the measure. For California cities, GO bonds are secured by a promise to levy ad valorem property taxes (property taxes based on the value of the property) in an unlimited amount as necessary to pay debt service. Voters approve the maximum amount of debt (bonds) that can be issued. The ad valorem taxes levied to pay debt service on city GO bonds are in addition to the 1 percent general ad valorem property tax. Although the California Constitution was modified in 2000 through the enactment of Proposition 39 to allow schools, community colleges, and county education offices, under defined circumstances, to have a 55 percent popular vote threshold, City GO bonds still require a two-thirds favorable vote. While GO bonds can be issued for different lengths of time, the most common are 30-year bonds with 40 years being the maximum maturity duration.

Though the GO Bond tax rate is applied uniformly against the property’s Assessed Value (AV), due to Proposition 13, properties that have changed ownership will have a higher AV and GO Bond tax burden than those properties that haven’t. Revenue is very stable with low volatility even during a recession.

EIFD, CRIA, Special Assessment Districts
Targeted tools are special districts that can be used for attracting investment in water and wastewater infrastructure. Targeted financing tools differ from other tools because they target specific geographic areas or difficult to finance sectors in a community, offering incentives, tax rebates, credits, and unique financing structures that drive investment and development within that geographic footprint. A recent study found that rural water districts are most effective at engaging in sustainability partnerships.

Most of these targeted tools fall into a category called special district financing, and they all provide a slightly different approach to a similar concept. Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFD) and Community Revitalization and Investment Authorities (CRIA) EIFDs and CRIAs are mechanisms for capturing the future tax benefits of improvements in order to pay for the present cost of those improvements. In other states, this financing structure is known as tax increment financing (TIF). TIF had historically been used in California by redevelopment agencies until their dissolution in 2012 rendered the traditional form of TIF unavailable in the state. New financing mechanisms such as EIFDs and CRIAs are generating a lot of interest as replacement tools for TIF. 15 EIFDs and CRIAs are opportunities for entities to finance upgrades to sewer expansion, repair, storm drainage, water supply, and more. Special Assessment Districts Special assessment district financing mechanisms are common but under-utilized tools. Special Assessment Districts work by adding (“assessing”) an additional tax on top of the existing property or sales taxes for property owners and/or businesses within the district. This additional pool of tax revenue is then used to finance whatever improvement(s) the district was designed to do.

The EIFD provides broad flexibility in what it can fund. No public vote is required to establish an authority, and though a 55 percent vote is required to issue bonds, other financing alternatives exist.

Unlike former redevelopment, this tool imposes no geographic limitations on where it can be used, and no blight findings are required. An EIFD can be used on a single street, in a neighborhood or throughout an entire city. It can also cross jurisdictional boundaries and involve multiple cities and a county. While an individual city can form an EIFD without participation from other local governments, the flexibility of this tool and the enhanced financial capacity created by partnerships will likely generate creative discussions between local agencies on how the tool can be used to fund common priorities.3
Tax increment financing (TIF) works by freezing the property tax revenues that flow from a designated project area to the city, county, and other taxing entities at the “base level” in the current year.

Additional tax revenue in future years (the “increment”) is diverted into a separate pool of money, which can be used either to pay for improvements directly or to pay back bonds issued against the anticipated TIF revenue.
18 Main St., Sutter Creek, CA 95685 • Telephone: (209)267-5647 • Fax: (209)267-1655 • TTY: 711 The City of Sutter Creek is an equal opportunity service provider and employer ______________________________________________________________________________

STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY

COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: JANUARY 21, 2020
FROM: AMY GEDNEY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONCEPTUAL SUPPORT FOR PLACEMENT OF A HALF CENT

SALES TAX MEASURE FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE, REPAIR &
IMPROVEMENT ON THE NOVEMBER, 2020 BALLOT
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution – 2019-2020-* expressing conceptual support for placement of a self-help sales and/or use tax measure for streets and roads repair, maintenance and improvement on the November, 2020 ballot.

BACKGROUND:

Several months ago Supervisors Frank Axe and Brian Oneto convened a meeting of the cities and county to discuss the need for improvements to the Amador County road network. Over the course of these meetings, participants agreed that there was definitely a need for improvements to the systemwide road network. The discussion has since centered around the possibility of a half-cent sales tax to be approved by the voters, and if approved, how financial distribution would work.

DISCUSSION:

Attached for your review and consideration is a “white paper” summary of the discussion that defines the needs based on a pavement condition index, PCI. It is clear that there is a need to improve our road network. There simply are not enough gas tax allocations to improve the current roadway conditions because we have fallen so far behind. After evaluating options, it is apparent that in an effort to help ourselves we would become a “self-help” jurisdiction. Once self-help status is achieved, a jurisdiction qualifies for additional funding opportunities including additional monies available through the SB-1 program.

Each city and the County is presenting this item to their respective jurisdictions to determine if enough support can be garnered for a half cent sales tax measure. Should this matter receive the necessary support, it would move forward for eventual placement on the November 2020 General Election ballot for consideration by the voters of Amador.

Our Roads, Our Responsibility
A Proposed Solution to Amador County’s
Road Repair, Maintenance and Improvement
Funding Shortfall

January, 2020
This white paper was prepared by an ad-hoc committee comprised of local elected officials and staff from the County of Amador and each of the county’s five incorporated cities, Amador County Transportation Commission staff, and members of the public. Ad-hoc committee members included the following:

Frank Axe, District 4 Supervisor, County of Amador
Brian Oneto, District 5 Supervisor, County of Amador
David Growth, Mayor, City of Amador City
Robert Stimpson, Mayor, City of Jackson
Jon Colburn, Council Member, City of Plymouth
Robin Peters, Mayor, City of Sutter Creek
Jon Hanken, City Manager, City of Ione
Rex Osborn, City Manager, City of Plymouth
Amy Gedney, City Manager, City of Sutter Creek
John Gedney, Executive Director, Amador County Transportation Commission Michael Colton, Finance Director, City of Plymouth
Steve Christensen, public member
Gary Reinoehl, public member
Our Roads, Our Responsibility 1
Our Roads, Our Responsibility
Introduction
Local government is responsible for providing the basic services society thrives on:
sewer, water, refuse collection, parks, planning & zoning, street and roads, among others. Society relies on these services and expects delivery to be prompt, efficient and cost effective.

However, local government budgets have been ravaged in recent decades. Cities and counties that rely heavily on property tax revenue can experience dramatic decreases in revenues during economic downturns. In addition, statewide ballot measures have limited governments’ ability to raise needed revenues through taxes and fees, and the revenues produced by even well-intentioned revenue measures never seem to trickle down from Sacramento at a rate which allows small jurisdictions like those in Amador County to catch up with costs. All this while demand for services continues and costs rise.

Funding for repair, maintenance and improvement of city and county streets and roads is a particularly daunting task. Road repair and maintenance projects are among the most expensive facing local government, and while some revenue is generated through the statewide gas tax program, the amount distributed at the local level is paltry compared with the cost of needed work. Most recently, SB-1 promised a steady stream of revenue from additional taxes levied at the pump, but most of the revenues seem to find their way to larger urban areas and revenues received locally fall dismally short of the need. The result of this imbalance between revenues and needs is deferred maintenance – city and county streets and roads which go un-repaired and deteriorate further due to the funding gap.

Exasperated by the situation, in early 2019 representatives of the five incorporated cities and the county began to collaboratively study the problem. Early on, it became abundantly clear that each of the cities and the county were suffering the same fate, and each reported significant pressure from the public to do something about it. It was generally agreed that waiting for state or federal sources to step in with help was not the answer – if we’re to close the funding gap for streets and roads repair, we’ll have to do it ourselves. The concept of a self-help revenue measure was born.

Our Roads, Our Responsibility 2
Transportation infrastructure needs in Amador County
The generally poor condition of Amador County’s streets and roads is partly understandable, as most are well over 50 years – and some over 100 years old.

Unfortunately, years of inadequate funding for routine maintenance has allowed many area roadways to reach a point of no return – a condition beyond which repair isn’t an option. History has shown that it costs much less to maintain streets in good condition than to repair or replace streets that have failed, so it’s important to address street & road repairs early to avoid the high cost of wholesale replacement.

In 2015 each of the five cities and the county participated in a pavement management study, and in 2020 the study was updated for current conditions. The study was designed to identify improvement needs for area streets and roads, assign a pavement condition index (PCI) to each roadway, and then develop a strategy for improving deteriorated roadways and maintaining others to avoid more costly repairs. As a measure of pavement condition, the PCI ranges from 0 to 100 with a newly constructed street having a PCI of 100, and a failed street having a PCI of 25 or less. Generally speaking, street conditions are considered “good” when the PCI is between 70 and 100; “fair” with a PCI between 50 and 69; and “poor” with a PCI between 25 and 49. A common goal is to maintain a PCI of 75 or higher.

The average PCIs for each of the cities and the county for 2015 and 2020 are summarized in Table 1. As is evident, pavement conditions are actively deteriorating and each of the cities and the county are facing significant road repair and improvement needs.

Table 1 – Pavement Management Study Results
Average PCI1
Remaining
Service Life
(years)2
Funding Needed To
Increase to “Good” PCI
(75+) Over 20 years
2015 2020 2015 2020
County of Amador 57 45 11 8 $174.3 million
Amador City 85 66 29 19 $746,643
Ione 68 58 20 16 $13 million
Jackson 56 45 14 12 $12.7 million
Plymouth 75 65 21 15 $2.6 million
Sutter Creek 59 51 17 13 $8.7 million
1 Average of all roadways in the network.
2 An estimate of the amount of time required for pavements to reach a “very poor/failed” condition, or a PCI of less than 25, if no maintenance were to occur.

Our Roads, Our Responsibility 3
Infrastructure funding and funding gaps
Conventional sources of funding for streets and roads projects include gas tax (HUTA) revenues, grants, and more recently SB-1 gas tax revenues. Gas tax and SB-1 are annual funding streams that may be used for road repair and maintenance. Grants can generate significant revenues, but opportunities are limited or intermittent and grants are not often awarded for basic repair and maintenance of existing facilities. For this reason, grants are not considered a viable solution for the purposes of this analysis.

Table 2 shows current levels of gas tax and SB-1 funding for each of the cities and the county, together with annual funding requirements extrapolated from the most recent pavement management studies.

Table 2 – Funding Breakdown
Gas Tax SB-1
Annual
Revenue
Available
Annual
Revenue
Needed
Annual
Revenue
Shortfall
County of
Amador $1,624,089 $1,604,388 $3,228,477 $8,715,000 ($5,486,523) Amador City $3,211 $9,473 $12,684 $37,332 ($24,648)
Ione $138,179 $165,911 $304,090 $650,000 ($345,910)
Jackson $80,745 $98,190 $178,935 $635,000 ($456,065)
Plymouth $17,279 $25,644 $42,923 $130,000 ($87,077)
Sutter Creek $43,151 $55,184 $98,335 $435,065 ($336,730) Total $3,865,444 $10,602,397 ($6,736,953)
As shown above, revenues available to each of the cities and the county fall far short of those needed to improve roadway conditions to acceptable levels, and then to maintain them at those levels.

Options moving forward
Fundamentally, local government is charged with providing its residents with adequately maintained roadways, but adequate revenues are not available to get the job done. The five cities and the county have met to evaluate options to address the problem on a regional scale. As it turns out, options are rather limited. They include:

Our Roads, Our Responsibility 4
- Budget only available revenues and allow area roadways to continue to deteriorate (i.e. continue on the current path);
- Wait for other sources of revenue to materialize, e.g. assume state and federal funding sources will recognize our needs and fund them; - Divert revenues from other programs such as police and fire protection; - Develop a new revenue stream that is focused specifically on local needs.

As discussed above, available revenues are not sufficient to prevent continued roadway deterioration. Current budgeting has led to mounting deferred maintenance obligations, which will eventually cause our roadway conditions to fall below the “repair” and into the “replace” category. Our pavement management studies concluded that replacement of a failed roadway can cost more than 16 times the cost of maintaining it properly. Clearly, the status quo is not a viable option.

While state and federal funding can be an important source of revenue for road construction and improvements, it is not typically a significant source of funding for maintenance and repair of existing roadways. Likewise, grant monies are mostly focused on new facilities, rather than on maintenance or repair of existing facilities.

Diverting revenues from other needed programs is always an option, and from time to time every city and county government has made such adjustments on an asneeded basis. However, most municipal budgets are strained, and reasonable adjustments intended to balance revenues between disparate needs have mostly been made already. The unfortunate reality is that road maintenance and repairs are very costly, and those costs almost always outstrip the ability to shift revenues without negatively affecting other programs.

Development of a new revenue stream appears to be the only viable option.

What other counties and cities have done
Research shows that Amador County and its five incorporated cities are not the only entities to face this dilemma. To date, the voters of more than 25 California counties involving numerous jurisdictions have elected to initiate “self-help” measures to raise the revenues needed to address their budget shortfalls. Most selfhelp measures have taken the form of a local sales or use tax; for example, the addition of a half-cent sales tax which is specifically designated for local uses.

According to the Self-Help Counties Coalition, 88% of California’s population – more than 34 million people – currently live in self-help counties.

Our Roads, Our Responsibility 5
All of the sales tax consumers pay at local retailers currently flows to the state, and of that only 0.75% is returned to cities and counties for local use – the vast majority of sales tax revenues are not available for local government to apply to local needs.

By contrast, 100% of a self-help sales or use tax would return directly to Amador’s cities and the county for direct application to its roadways. It is estimated that at least $3 million annually would be collected by a half-cent local sales or use tax, all of which would flow back to this county’s roadways.

A recommended solution for Amador County
The five incorporated cities and the county have collaborated to develop a self-help revenue measure which would directly and significantly address area roadway needs. The fundamentals are as follows:
- Place a half-cent sales/use tax measure on the November, 2020 ballot for voter approval. A half-cent measure is projected to generate more than $3 million annually in badly needed revenue;
- The cities and the county enter into a revenue sharing agreement which is fair and agreeable to all entities, and which recognizes a regional goal of improving and maintaining area roadways collaboratively, for the benefit of the public at large. The revenue sharing agreement incorporates a simple formula based on proportional distribution of revenues by population; - All revenues would be restricted to roadway repair, maintenance and improvements. Each of the cities and the county have developed different standards for roadway improvements, so each entity would individually dictate the actual improvements to be made. Importantly though, no revenues could be used for non-transportation expenditures. - Public safeguards and transparency would be incorporated into the measure.

Safeguards would include a sunset clause (10 years, after which the measure would expire unless voters extended it voluntarily); regular audits to provide public transparency regarding how revenues were spent; annual assessment of the results of maintenance project implementation; formation of a citizen oversight committee to monitor the program and ensure its efficacy; and regional coordination of the program through the Amador County Transportation Commission.

Table 3 presents the revenue distribution plan that has been developed by the cities and the county.

Our Roads, Our Responsibility 6
Table 3 – Self-help Projected Revenues
2019
Population
% of Total County
Population
Population- Based
Proportional Revenue
County of
Amador 21,774 63.11 $1,893,227
Amador City 188 0.54 $16,346
Ione 4,200 12.17 $365,186
Jackson 4,770 13.82 $414,747
Plymouth 1,012 2.93 $87,992
Sutter Creek 2,559 7.42 $222,502
As shown, revenues generated through a self-help measure, structured as recommended, would over time help each of the cities and the county achieve their pavement management goals for at least the coming decade.

As a bonus, in addition to revenues generated directly by the measure, self-help entities are eligible for additional funding through the self-help provisions of SB-1.

Two separate programs are available, one which automatically grants additional monies to cities and counties that have elected to institute self-help measures, and another which provides funding to self-help counties for projects on a competitive basis. In both cases, those monies are set aside solely for self-help entities. SB-1 self-help monies may be used, in part, to help those cities with smaller populations to initiate projects that might otherwise be out of reach using annual revenues alone.

Summary
As Amador County’s residents we are proud of our communities, and we deserve adequately maintained roadways to ensure safe and efficient travel for our families and friends. Unfortunately, the cost of maintaining our roadways in good or better conditions far outweighs the revenues available to local governments to get the job done. To avoid siphoning revenues from other important programs, the five cities and the county have concluded that the best solution is a half-cent self-help sales or use tax, the proceeds of which would fund only Amador County roadway repairs, maintenance and improvements. Every penny of a self-help measure’s proceeds would accrue to Amador County’s roadways, and every penny would directly benefit the residents of Amador County. With appropriate safeguards in place, the public would be able to track where self-help revenues have been applied to ensure their intentions have been met.

RESOLUTION 20**-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SUTTER CREEK

EXPRESSING ITS SUPPORT IN CONCEPT FOR PLACEMENT OF A

SELF-HELP SALES AND/OR USE TAX MEASURE FOR STREETS AND ROADS REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT ON THE NOVEMBER, 2020 BALLOT WHEREAS, local government is responsible for providing the basic services society thrives on including sewer, water, refuse collection, parks, planning & zoning, and streets and roads, among other services; and
WHEREAS, cities and counties that rely heavily on property tax revenues can experience dramatic decreases in revenues during economic downturns, and statewide ballot measures have limited local government’s ability to raise needed revenues through taxes and fees; and WHEREAS, the repair, maintenance and improvement of the City’s streets and roads is a particularly daunting financial task, as road repair and maintenance projects are among the most expensive facing local government; and
WHEREAS, while revenues are generated through the statewide gas tax and Senate Bill 1 programs, the amount of said revenue distributed to the City is insufficient to repair and then maintain the City’s streets and roads at an acceptable level of service, compared with the cost of needed work; and
WHEREAS, the resulting imbalance between revenues and needs is manifested as deferred maintenance, and City streets and roads will further deteriorate unless measures are taken to close the funding gap and generate additional revenues for streets and roads repair, maintenance and improvement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Sutter Creek does hereby express its support in concept for placement of a self-help sales and/or use tax measure on the November, 2020 ballot with the understanding that such a tax would generate revenues intended to address the funding gap between revenues needed to restore and then maintain the City’s streets and roads at an acceptable level of service, and revenues projected to be available for such purposes.

The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Sutter Creek on the day of , 2020 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

City of Sutter Creek
______________________________
Robin D. Peters, Mayor
INYO
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Bishop 8.75%
KERN
COUNTY

7.25%
City of Arvin 8.25%
City of Bakersfield 8.25%
City of Delano 8.25%
City of McFarland 8.25%
City of Ridgecrest 9.25%
City of Taft 8.25%
City of Tehachapi 8.25%
City of Wasco 8.25%
Kern (Unincorporated Area)

8.25%
KINGS
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Avenal 8.25%
City of Corcoran 8.25%
LAKE
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Clearlake 8.75%
City of Lakeport 8.75%
LASSEN
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Susanville 8.25%

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY 9.50%
City of Alhambra 10.25%
City of Arcadia 10.25%
City of Avalon 10.00%
City of Azusa 10.25%
City of Baldwin Park 10.25%
City of Bell Gardens 10.25%
City of Bellflower 10.25%
City of Burbank 10.25%
City of Carson 10.25%
City of Commerce 10.25%
City of Compton 10.25%
City of Covina 10.25%
City of Cudahy 10.25%

ALAMEDA
COUNTY 10.25%
City of Alameda 10.75%
City of Albany 10.75%
City of Emeryville 10.50%
City of Hayward 10.75%
City of Newark 10.75%
City of San Leandro 10.75%
City of Union City 10.75%
ALPINE
COUNTY 7.25%
AMADOR
COUNTY 7.75%
BUTTE
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Chico 8.25%
City of Oroville 8.25%
Town of Paradise 7.75%

CALAVERAS
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Angels Camp 7.75%
COLUSA
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Colusa 8.75%
City of Williams 8.25%

CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY 8.75%
City of Antioch 9.75%
City of Concord 9.75%
City of El Cerrito 10.25%
City of Hercules 9.25%
City of Martinez 9.75%
Town of Moraga 9.75%
City of Orinda 9.75%
City of Pinole 9.75%
City of Pittsburg 9.25%
City of Pleasant Hill 9.25%
City of Richmond 9.75%
City of San Pablo 9.50%
City of Walnut Creek 9.25%

DEL NORTE
COUNTY

7.25%
City of Crescent City 8.25%
Del Norte (Unincorporated
Area)

8.25%

EL DORADO
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Placerville 8.25%
City of South Lake Tahoe

8.75%
FRESNO
COUNTY 7.975%
City of Coalinga 8.975%
City of Fowler 8.975%
City of Fresno 8.35%
City of Huron 8.975%
City of Kerman 8.975%
City of Kingsburg 8.975%
City of Mendota 9.225%
City of Parlier 8.975%
City of Reedley 9.225%
City of Sanger 8.725%
City of Selma 8.475%
GLENN
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Orland 7.75%

HUMBOLDT
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Arcata 8.50%
City of Blue Lake 8.75%
City of Eureka 9.25%
City of Ferndale 8.50%
City of Fortuna 8.50%
City of Rio Dell 8.75%
City of Trinidad 8.50%

IMPERIAL
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Calexico 8.25%
City of El Centro 8.25%
City of Culver City 10.25%
City of Downey 10.00%
City of Duarte 10.25%
City of El Monte 10.00%
City of Gardena 10.25%
City of Glendale 10.25%
City of Glendora 10.25%
City of Hawaiian Gardens

10.25%
City of Hawthorne 10.25%
City of Huntington Park

10.25%
City of Inglewood 10.00%
City of Irwindale 10.25%
City of La Puente 10.00%
City of La Verne 10.25%
City of Lakewood 10.25%
City of Lancaster 10.25%
City of Lawndale 10.25%
City of Lomita 10.25%
City of Long Beach 10.25%
City of Lynwood 10.25%
City of Malibu 10.00%
City of Monrovia 10.25%
City of Montebello 10.25%
City of Monterey Park 10.25%
City of Norwalk 10.25%
City of Palmdale 10.25%
City of Paramount 10.25%
City of Pasadena 10.25%
City of Pico Rivera 10.25%
City of Pomona 10.25%
City of San Fernando 10.25%
City of San Gabriel 10.25%
City of Santa Fe Springs

10.50%
City of Santa Monica 10.25%
City of Sierra Madre 10.25%
City of Signal Hill 10.25%
City of South El Monte

10.25%
City of South Gate 10.25%
City of South Pasadena

10.25%
City of Torrance 10.00%
CDTFA-95 (S1F) REV. 29 (7-23) STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SALES AND USE TAX RATES CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION California Sales and Use Tax Rates by County and City
Operative July 1, 2023 (includes state, county, local, and district taxes) * For more details, refer to www.cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/sales-use-tax-rates.htm.

Note: Some communities located within a county or a city may not be listed. If you are in doubt about the correct rate or if you cannot find a community, please call our toll-free number at 1-800-400-7115 (CRS:711). You may also call the local California Department of Tax and Fee Administration office nearest you for assistance.

1. This county tax rate applies to areas that are within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Del Norte.

2. This county tax rate applies to areas that are not within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Del Norte.

3. This county tax rate applies to areas that are within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Kern.

4. This county tax rate applies to areas that are not within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Kern.

CDTFA-95 (S1B) REV. 29 (7-23)

SALES AND USE TAX RATES
City of Vernon 10.25%
City of West Hollywood

10.25%
City of Whittier 10.25%
MADERA
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Chowchilla 8.75%
City of Madera 8.25%
MARIN
COUNTY 8.25%
Town of Corte Madera 9.00%
Town of Fairfax 9.00%
City of Larkspur 9.25%
City of Novato 8.50%
Town of San Anselmo 9.25%
City of San Rafael 9.25%
City of Sausalito 9.25%

MARIPOSA
COUNTY 8.75%

MENDOCINO
COUNTY 7.875%
City of Fort Bragg 8.875%
City of Point Arena 8.375%
City of Ukiah 8.875%
City of Willits 9.125%
MERCED
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Atwater 8.75%
City of Gustine 8.25%
City of Los Banos 8.75%
City of Merced 8.25%
MODOC
COUNTY 7.25%
MONO
COUNTY 7.25%
Town of Mammoth Lakes

7.75%

MONTEREY
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea

9.25%
City of Del Rey Oaks 9.25%
City of Gonzales 8.75%
City of Greenfield 9.50%
City of King City 8.75%
City of Marina 9.25%
City of Monterey 9.25%
City of Pacific Grove 9.25%
City of Salinas 9.25%
City of Sand City 9.25%
City of Seaside 9.25%
City of Soledad 9.25%
NAPA
COUNTY 7.75%
City of St. Helena 8.25%
NEVADA
COUNTY 7.50%
City of Grass Valley 8.50%
City of Nevada City 8.375%
Town of Truckee 8.25%
ORANGE
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Fountain Valley

8.75%
City of Garden Grove 8.75%
City of La Habra 8.25%
City of La Palma 8.75%
City of Los Alamitos 9.25%
City of Placentia 8.75%
City of Santa Ana 9.25%
City of Seal Beach 8.75%
City of Stanton 8.75%
City of Westminster 8.75%
PLACER
COUNTY 7.25%
Town of Loomis 7.50%
City of Roseville 7.75%
PLUMAS
COUNTY 7.25%

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Blythe 8.75%
City of Cathedral City 8.75%
City of Coachella 8.75%
City of Corona 8.75%
City of Hemet 8.75%
City of Indio 8.75%
City of La Quinta 8.75%
City of Lake Elsinore 8.75%
City of Menifee 8.75%
City of Murrieta 8.75%
City of Norco 8.75%
City of Palm Springs 9.25%
City of Riverside 8.75%
City of San Jacinto 8.75%
City of Temecula 8.75%
City of Wildomar 8.75%

SACRAMENTO
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Elk Grove 8.75%
City of Galt 9.25%
City of Isleton 8.75%
City of Rancho Cordova

8.75%
City of Sacramento 8.75%

SAN BENITO
COUNTY 8.25%
City of Hollister 9.25%
City of San Juan
Bautista 9.00%

SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Barstow 8.75%
City of Colton 8.75%
City of Montclair 9.00%
City of Ontario 8.75%
City of Redlands 8.75%
City of San Bernardino

8.75%
City of Victorville 8.75%
Town of Yucca Valley 8.75%

SAN DIEGO
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Chula Vista 8.75%
City of Del Mar 8.75%
City of El Cajon 8.25%
City of Imperial Beach 8.75%
City of La Mesa 8.50%
City of National City 8.75%
City of Oceanside 8.25%
City of Solana Beach 8.75%
City of Vista 8.25%

SAN FRANCISCO
COUNTY 8.625%

SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Lathrop 8.75%
City of Lodi 8.25%
City of Manteca 8.25%
City of Stockton 9.00%
City of Tracy 8.25%

SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Arroyo Grande 7.75%
City of Atascadero 8.75%
City of Grover Beach 8.75%
City of Morro Bay 8.75%
City of Paso Robles 8.75%
City of Pismo Beach 7.75%
City of San Luis Obispo

8.75%

SAN MATEO
COUNTY 9.375%
City of Belmont 9.875%
City of Brisbane 9.875%
City of Burlingame 9.625%
City of Daly City 9.875%
City of East Palo Alto 9.875%
City of Pacifica 9.875%
City of Redwood City

9.875%
City of San Bruno 9.875%
City of San Mateo 9.625%
City of South San Francisco

9.875%

SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Carpinteria 9.00%
City of Guadalupe 8.75%
City of Lompoc 8.75%
City of Santa Barbara 8.75%
City of Santa Maria 8.75%
City of Solvang 8.75%

SANTA CLARA
COUNTY 9.125%
City of Campbell 9.375%
City of Los Gatos 9.25%
City of Milpitas 9.375%
City of San Jose 9.375%

SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY

8.50%
City of Capitola 9.00%
City of Santa Cruz 9.25%
City of Scotts Valley 9.75%
City of Watsonville 9.75%
Santa Cruz (Unincorporated
Area) 9.00%

5. This county tax rate applies to areas that are within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Santa Cruz.

6. This county tax rate applies to areas that are not within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Santa Cruz.

CDTFA-95 (S2) REV. 29 (7-23)

SALES AND USE TAX RATES

7. This county tax rate applies to areas that are within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Yuba.

8. This county tax rate applies to areas that are not within the boundaries of any incorporated city within the county of Yuba.

SHASTA
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Anderson 7.75%
SIERRA
COUNTY 7.25%

SISKIYOU
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Dunsmuir 7.75%
City of Mount Shasta 7.50%
City of Weed 7.50%
City of Yreka 7.75%
SOLANO
COUNTY 7.375%
City of Benicia 8.375%
City of Fairfield 8.375%
City of Rio Vista 8.125%
City of Suisun City 8.375%
City of Vacaville 8.125%
City of Vallejo 9.25%
SONOMA
COUNTY 8.50%
City of Cotati 9.50%
City of Healdsburg 9.00%
City of Petaluma 9.50%
City of Rohnert Park 9.00%
City of Santa Rosa 9.25%
City of Sebastopol 9.25%
City of Sonoma 9.00%

STANISLAUS
COUNTY 7.875%
City of Ceres 8.375%
City of Modesto 8.875%
City of Oakdale 8.375%
City of Turlock 8.625%
SUTTER
COUNTY 7.25%
TEHAMA
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Corning 7.75%
City of Red Bluff 7.50%

TRINITY
COUNTY 7.25%
TULARE
COUNTY 7.75%
City of Dinuba 8.50%
City of Exeter 8.75%
City of Farmersville 8.75%
City of Lindsay 8.75%
City of Porterville 9.25%
City of Tulare 8.25%
City of Visalia 8.50%
City of Woodlake 8.75%

TUOLUMNE
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Sonora 8.75%

VENTURA
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Oxnard 9.25%
City of Port Hueneme 8.75%
City of Santa Paula 8.25%
City of Ventura 7.75%
YOLO
COUNTY 7.25%
City of Davis 8.25%
City of West Sacramento

8.25%
City of Woodland 8.00%
YUBA
COUNTY

7.25%
City of Marysville 8.25%
City of Wheatland 7.75%
Yuba (Unincorporated Area)

8.25%
12/9/2022 Page 1 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Alameda Alameda 1,996,230 10.00 9/18/1990
Alameda Albany - - -
Alameda Berkeley 3,114,546 12.00 7/25/1991
Alameda Dublin 743,962 8.00 1/1/1982
Alameda Emeryville 2,278,249 12.00 1/2/2002
Alameda Fremont 2,848,472 10.00 1/1/2009
Alameda Hayward 2,161,395 8.50 8/4/1993
Alameda Livermore 1,881,527 8.00 10/1/1983
Alameda Newark 2,916,050 10.00 11/6/2001
Alameda Oakland 13,496,356 14.00 10/1/2009
Alameda Piedmont - - -
Alameda Pleasanton 2,014,843 8.00 9/1/1983
Alameda San Leandro 395,831 14.00 11/8/2016
Alameda Union City 1,072,250 12.87 7/1/2019
Amador Amador 2,822 8.00 8/17/2000
Amador Ione 6,915 10.00 1/1/2005
Amador Jackson 502,547 10.00 1/1/2003
Amador Plymouth 326,342 10.00 1/1/2013
Amador Sutter Creek 205,873 12.00 7/1/2021
Butte Biggs - - -
Butte Chico 3,063,513 10.00 5/5/1994
Butte Gridley 31,055 6.00 12/14/1998
Butte Oroville 1,034,424 9.00 7/21/1992
Butte Paradise 169,604 10.00 1/1/1990
Calaveras Angels 1,228,485 10.00 5/6/2003
Colusa Colusa 35,391 8.00 1/1/1995
Colusa Williams 503,300 10.00 3/6/2001
Contra Costa Antioch 292,968 10.00 9/11/1992
Contra Costa Brentwood 486,632 10.00 1/1/1983
Contra Costa Clayton - - -
Contra Costa Concord 1,960,534 10.00 6/25/1991
Contra Costa Danville 86,882 6.50 7/8/1982
Contra Costa El Cerrito 126,164 10.00 7/1/1990
Contra Costa Hercules 7,635 10.00 3/6/2001
Contra Costa Lafayette 263,680 9.50 1/1/1993
Contra Costa Martinez 457,109 10.00 9/1/1994
Contra Costa Moraga - - -
Contra Costa Oakley 240,477 10.00 7/1/1999
Contra Costa Orinda 34,660 8.50 7/11/1989
Contra Costa Pinole 446,106 10.00 5/6/1991
Contra Costa Pittsburg 594,956 10.00 1/1/2012
12/9/2022 Page 2 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Contra Costa Pleasant Hill 1,654,287 10.00 7/1/1991
Contra Costa Richmond 781,864 10.00 7/1/1989
Contra Costa San Pablo 666,643 12.00 8/1/2006
Contra Costa San Ramon 768,417 7.25 4/1/1993
Contra Costa Walnut Creek 1,378,373 8.50 3/1/1985
Del Norte Crescent City 1,540,803 10.00 7/1/1993
El Dorado Placerville 189,513 10.00 7/26/1966
El Dorado South Lake Tahoe 20,353,782 12.00 1/7/2017
Fresno Clovis 2,572,912 10.00 3/27/1996
Fresno Coalinga 35,680 6.00 9/1/1974
Fresno Firebaugh 13,344 4.00 10/10/2000
Fresno Fowler 140,349 10.00 10/10/2010
Fresno Fresno 12,565,880 12.00 10/1/1988
Fresno Huron 4,771 10.00 1/1/1995
Fresno Kerman - - -
Fresno Kingsburg 349,913 12.00 1/1/2009
Fresno Mendota 3,696 10.00 5/26/1998
Fresno Orange Cove - - -
Fresno Parlier - - -
Fresno Reedley 57,816 8.00 7/1/1990
Fresno San Joaquin - - -
Fresno Sanger 2,291 4.00 7/15/1964
Fresno Selma 397,277 12.00 2/1/2014
Glenn Orland 69,449 10.00 7/1/2006
Glenn Willows 840,304 12.00 2/1/2013
Humboldt Arcata 1,641,954 10.00 7/1/1981
Humboldt Blue Lake - 10.00 11/6/2018
Humboldt Eureka 3,284,475 10.00 1/1/2009
Humboldt Ferndale 178,856 12.00 6/30/2015
Humboldt Fortuna 755,125 12.00 7/1/2012
Humboldt Rio Dell 20,597 10.00 4/18/2017
Humboldt Trinidad 99,419 12.00 7/13/2011
Imperial Brawley 451,752 8.00 10/1/1984
Imperial Calexico 341,221 12.00 1/1/2019
Imperial Calipatria 18,859 8.00 1/13/1989
Imperial El Centro 2,151,327 10.00 1/1/1994
Imperial Holtville - 4.00 5/12/1965
Imperial Imperial 61,855 10.00 7/1/2010
Imperial Westmorland 83,921 10.00 2/2/2002
Inyo Bishop 2,815,052 12.00 7/1/2004
Kern Arvin - - -
12/9/2022 Page 3 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Kern Bakersfield 8,863,710 12.00 8/1/1993
Kern California City 86,374 6.00 7/1/2004
Kern Delano 552,830 10.00 6/20/1992
Kern Maricopa 23,420 10.00 7/1/1992
Kern McFarland* - 6.00 7/1/1964
Kern Ridgecrest 1,345,337 12.00 10/1/2012
Kern Shafter - - -
Kern Taft 144,130 10.00 1/1/1995
Kern Tehachapi 842,473 8.00 1/1/1983
Kern Wasco 156,314 10.00 7/1/1995
Kings Avenal 4,228 6.00 3/27/1980
Kings Corcoran 54,147 8.00 7/5/1988
Kings Hanford 506,042 8.00 1/1/1985
Kings Lemoore 292,391 8.00 1/9/1985
Lake Clearlake 427,715 9.00 10/1/1992
Lake Lakeport 215,482 10.00 1/1/1990
Lassen Susanville 454,622 10.00 7/1/2004
Los Angeles Agoura Hills 1,494,022 12.00 11/15/1996
Los Angeles Alhambra 403,305 12.00 3/25/1991
Los Angeles Arcadia 1,923,352 10.00 7/1/1993
Los Angeles Artesia 443,777 12.50 1/1/2009
Los Angeles Avalon 6,020,046 12.00 7/1/2004
Los Angeles Azusa 796,912 10.00 4/1/2015
Los Angeles Baldwin Park 359,703 10.00 7/13/1986
Los Angeles Bell 350,111 12.00 5/10/2017
Los Angeles Bell Gardens 410,282 8.00 10/1/1983
Los Angeles Bellflower 823,782 9.00 4/12/1988
Los Angeles Beverly Hills 19,291,693 14.00 2/1/1994
Los Angeles Bradbury - - -
Los Angeles Burbank 5,531,388 10.00 9/27/1983
Los Angeles Calabasas 983,758 12.00 4/5/1991
Los Angeles Carson 1,647,103 9.00 10/5/1993
Los Angeles Cerritos 924,051 12.00 3/5/2015
Los Angeles Claremont 1,052,461 10.00 7/1/1978
Los Angeles Commerce 1,717,154 12.00 1/1/2006
Los Angeles Compton 67,925 7.50 7/1/1983
Los Angeles Covina 3,661 10.00 7/1/1991
Los Angeles Cudahy 54,344 8.00 4/11/1988
Los Angeles Culver City 3,073,676 14.00 7/1/2012
Los Angeles Diamond Bar 797,785 14.00 12/14/2018
Los Angeles Downey 1,298,006 9.00 3/1/1992
12/9/2022 Page 4 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Los Angeles Duarte 106,614 10.00 6/25/1991
Los Angeles El Monte 831,929 10.00 10/1/1992
Los Angeles El Segundo 4,893,187 12.00 4/12/2016
Los Angeles Gardena 940,637 11.00 1/1/2003
Los Angeles Glendale 4,117,909 12.00 4/28/2015
Los Angeles Glendora 134,426 6.00 12/22/1977
Los Angeles Hawaiian Gardens 132,292 9.00 7/1/2002
Los Angeles Hawthorne 4,186,432 12.00 12/1/2001
Los Angeles Hermosa Beach 2,552,964 12.00 1/1/2016
Los Angeles Hidden Hills - - -
Los Angeles Huntington Park 80,166 5.00 9/4/1985
Los Angeles Industry 364,865 10.00 7/1/1983
Los Angeles Inglewood 4,679,863 14.00 6/1/1998
Los Angeles Irwindale - - -
Los Angeles La Canada Flintridge - - -
Los Angeles La Habra Heights - - -
Los Angeles La Mirada 1,081,422 10.00 1/1/2013
Los Angeles La Puente 205,661 10.00 10/27/1993
Los Angeles La Verne 6,360 10.00 1/1/2000
Los Angeles Lakewood 86,903 8.00 8/7/1987
Los Angeles Lancaster 2,012,943 7.00 11/1/1983
Los Angeles Lawndale 712,164 9.00 1/1/1992
Los Angeles Lomita 198,839 10.00 3/18/1996
Los Angeles Long Beach 20,323,890 13.00 7/1/2020
Los Angeles Los Angeles 130,172,065 14.00 8/1/1993
Los Angeles Lynwood - - -
Los Angeles Malibu 8,014,685 15.00 1/1/2021
Los Angeles Manhattan Beach 2,802,514 12.00 5/1/2020
Los Angeles Maywood 77,468 5.00 1/9/1960
Los Angeles Monrovia 1,348,381 12.00 7/13/2018
Los Angeles Montebello 223,620 10.00 7/1/1998
Los Angeles Monterey Park 953,200 12.00 6/5/1989
Los Angeles Norwalk 1,480,676 10.00 10/1/1990
Los Angeles Palmdale 4,667,137 10.00 7/1/2009
Los Angeles Palos Verdes Estates - - -
Los Angeles Paramount - - -
Los Angeles Pasadena 6,297,629 12.11 7/1/1999
Los Angeles Pico Rivera 433,797 10.00 5/21/1990
Los Angeles Pomona 2,181,603 10.00 1/1/1995
Los Angeles Rancho Palos Verdes 3,115,435 10.00 10/15/1991 Los Angeles Redondo Beach 3,400,322 12.00 7/2/2005
12/9/2022 Page 5 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
Transient Tax Effective
County City * Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Rate
(%)
Date
Los Angeles Rolling Hills - - -
Los Angeles Rolling Hills Estates - - -
Los Angeles Rosemead 1,405,397 10.00 4/1/1993
Los Angeles San Dimas 1,482,082 12.00 7/1/2013
Los Angeles San Fernando - - -
Los Angeles San Gabriel 1,377,019 12.00 3/1/2013
Los Angeles San Marino - - -
Los Angeles Santa Clarita 2,275,383 10.00 11/8/1987
Los Angeles Santa Fe Springs 172,204 10.00 10/1/1992
Los Angeles Santa Monica 20,691,803 14.00 1/1/2005
Los Angeles Sierra Madre - - -
Los Angeles Signal Hill 289,454 9.00 1/19/1986
Los Angeles South El Monte 268,482 8.00 4/10/1989
Los Angeles South Gate 473,886 8.00 1/1/1998
Los Angeles South Pasadena - - -
Los Angeles Temple City 40,025 10.00 7/11/1992
Los Angeles Torrance 6,031,651 11.00 3/1/1993
Los Angeles Vernon - - -
Los Angeles Walnut* - 10.00 1/1/1989
Los Angeles West Covina 1,305,663 10.00 1/1/1988
Los Angeles West Hollywood 9,675,868 12.50 1/1/2004
Los Angeles Westlake Village 2,045,754 10.00 8/1/1990
Los Angeles Whittier 783,749 10.00 10/1/1995
Madera Chowchilla 288,647 10.00 1/1/1991
Madera Madera 886,017 9.00 6/22/1989
Marin Belvedere - - -
Marin Corte Madera 436,390 12.00 1/1/1990
Marin Fairfax - 10.00 7/1/2000
Marin Larkspur 425,446 10.00 11/2/1993
Marin Mill Valley 528,423 10.00 1/1/1993
Marin Novato 1,289,595 12.00 1/1/2020
Marin Ross - - -
Marin San Anselmo - - -
Marin San Rafael 1,797,578 10.00 11/17/1988
Marin Sausalito 913,975 11.00 9/30/2009
Marin Tiburon 423,290 10.00 1/1/1990
Mendocino Fort Bragg 3,321,928 12.00 4/1/2017
Mendocino Point Arena 162,223 12.00 4/1/2017
Mendocino Ukiah 1,362,133 10.00 1/1/2007
Mendocino Willits 313,647 9.00 10/5/1990
Merced Atwater 69,857 8.00 1/1/1978
12/9/2022 Page 6 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Merced Dos Palos - - -
Merced Gustine - - -
Merced Livingston 136,331 9.00 5/18/2004
Merced Los Banos 362,364 10.00 7/1/1995
Merced Merced 1,779,854 10.00 7/1/1996
Modoc Alturas 202,145 10.00 12/10/1992
Mono Mammoth Lakes 21,394,798 10.00 1/1/1995
Monterey Carmel-By-The-Sea 5,339,285 10.00 4/1/1989
Monterey Del Rey Oaks 23,573 10.00 7/1/2018
Monterey Gonzales 1,641 8.00 7/1/1986
Monterey Greenfield 13,446 8.00 6/20/1985
Monterey King City 475,400 10.00 9/1/1992
Monterey Marina 3,501,246 14.00 1/1/2019
Monterey Monterey 15,369,231 10.00 7/1/1985
Monterey Pacific Grove 3,978,577 12.00 12/1/2017
Monterey Salinas 2,338,402 10.00 7/1/1984
Monterey Sand City - - -
Monterey Seaside 2,662,172 12.00 8/2/1991
Monterey Soledad 124,084 12.00 12/7/2016
Napa American Canyon 886,937 12.00 1/10/2011
Napa Calistoga 5,357,173 12.00 11/21/1993
Napa Napa 11,717,480 12.00 9/11/1993
Napa St. Helena 1,705,203 13.00 1/1/2019
Napa Yountville 5,222,634 13.00 1/1/2019
Nevada Grass Valley 881,875 10.00 12/1/1999
Nevada Nevada City 463,797 10.00 1/1/1992
Nevada Truckee 5,463,657 12.00 1/1/2021
Orange Aliso Viejo 723,599 10.00 7/1/2001
Orange Anaheim 30,180,355 15.00 7/1/1995
Orange Brea 1,050,303 10.00 8/1/1989
Orange Buena Park 3,703,860 12.00 10/1/1993
Orange Costa Mesa 4,282,804 8.00 12/17/2010
Orange Cypress 1,648,030 10.00 12/12/1991
Orange Dana Point 8,747,447 10.00 9/1/1990
Orange Fountain Valley 913,650 9.00 2/5/1991
Orange Fullerton 1,330,124 10.00 8/1/1989
Orange Garden Grove 7,487,361 14.50 12/21/2012
Orange Huntington Beach 10,378,662 10.00 11/1/2002
Orange Irvine 5,787,417 8.00 7/1/1983
Orange La Habra - - -
Orange La Palma 160,948 8.00 6/1/2006
12/9/2022 Page 7 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Orange Laguna Beach 15,426,259 14.00 1/1/2017
Orange Laguna Hills 678,706 10.00 10/1/1997
Orange Laguna Niguel 39,259 8.00 12/1/1989
Orange Laguna Woods 254,371 10.00 3/24/1999
Orange Lake Forest 2,883,787 10.00 12/20/1991
Orange Los Alamitos 223,450 8.00 4/22/1986
Orange Mission Viejo 635,204 8.00 3/31/1988
Orange Newport Beach 16,886,197 10.00 7/14/1993
Orange Orange 1,834,447 10.00 1/1/1970
Orange Placentia 674,854 10.00 7/1/1985
Orange Rancho Santa Margarita - - -
Orange San Clemente 2,306,752 10.00 10/1/1991
Orange San Juan Capistrano 1,088,151 10.00 6/1/1983
Orange Santa Ana 4,349,952 11.00 1/1/2005
Orange Seal Beach 878,165 12.00 7/1/1989
Orange Stanton 558,843 12.00 11/5/2019
Orange Tustin 1,218,924 13.00 12/4/2018
Orange Villa Park - - -
Orange Westminster 600,073 8.00 7/1/1983
Orange Yorba Linda 311,017 10.00 7/18/1988
Placer Auburn 268,302 8.00 8/1/1991
Placer Colfax 13,561 8.00 1/1/1975
Placer Lincoln 202,521 10.00 10/1/1999
Placer Loomis 18,754 8.00 7/1/1995
Placer Rocklin 688,896 8.00 5/15/1985
Placer Roseville 2,383,853 6.00 10/29/1975
Plumas Portola 37,006 9.00 2/6/1992
Riverside Banning 1,119,765 12.00 10/1/2010
Riverside Beaumont 298,879 10.00 7/30/1995
Riverside Blythe 1,481,789 10.00 8/9/1994
Riverside Calimesa 86,990 10.00 10/1/1991
Riverside Canyon Lake 66,634 10.00 12/1/1990
Riverside Cathedral City 3,670,394 12.00 1/1/2007
Riverside Coachella 578,100 9.00 10/28/1986
Riverside Corona 2,446,759 10.00 7/1/1995
Riverside Desert Hot Springs 2,490,646 12.00 12/14/2007 Riverside Eastvale - - -
Riverside Hemet 891,349 10.00 1/4/1995
Riverside Indian Wells 4,622,778 12.25 1/1/2020
Riverside Indio 8,699,125 13.00 12/11/2014
Riverside Jurupa Valley 310,493 10.00 7/1/2011
12/9/2022 Page 8 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Riverside La Quinta 11,491,449 10.00 1/1/1992
Riverside Lake Elsinore 550,508 10.00 4/1/1991
Riverside Menifee 506,967 10.00 1/1/2008
Riverside Moreno Valley 3,638,959 13.00 11/22/2016
Riverside Murrieta 1,388,646 10.00 7/1/1991
Riverside Norco 741,248 11.00 11/3/2009
Riverside Palm Desert 12,262,079 11.00 1/1/2017
Riverside Palm Springs 35,092,830 13.50 1/1/2004
Riverside Perris 99,283 10.00 12/8/1989
Riverside Rancho Mirage 6,932,720 10.00 5/21/1992
Riverside Riverside 5,801,263 13.00 7/1/2014
Riverside San Jacinto 14,890 8.00 6/30/1979
Riverside Temecula 3,022,209 8.00 2/13/1990
Riverside Wildomar - - -
Sacramento Citrus Heights 23,237 12.00 1/1/1997
Sacramento Elk Grove 1,433,720 12.00 11/2/2010
Sacramento Folsom 1,357,550 8.00 1/1/1986
Sacramento Galt 249,701 10.00 12/1/1985
Sacramento Isleton 1,930 10.00 7/10/1996
Sacramento Rancho Cordova 2,744,479 12.00 7/31/2003
Sacramento Sacramento 3,093,000 12.00 7/1/1994
San Benito Hollister 407,699 8.00 1/1/1998
San Benito San Juan Bautista 116,637 12.00 4/1/2004
San Bernardino Adelanto 13,930 10.00 5/9/2007
San Bernardino Apple Valley 39,993 7.00 6/14/2005
San Bernardino Barstow 3,435,428 12.50 1/1/2003
San Bernardino Big Bear Lake 11,164,837 8.00 1/1/2010
San Bernardino Chino 374,666 8.00 7/27/1978
San Bernardino Chino Hills 1,234,929 10.00 7/1/2006
San Bernardino Colton 1,238,975 10.00 5/3/1983
San Bernardino Fontana 1,132,091 8.00 5/7/1985
San Bernardino Grand Terrace - - -
San Bernardino Hesperia 1,798,649 10.00 7/1/1998
San Bernardino Highland 271,603 7.00 11/24/1987
San Bernardino Loma Linda 622,280 10.00 1/14/1998
San Bernardino Montclair 63,269 10.00 4/23/1983
San Bernardino Needles 937,710 10.00 5/20/1985
San Bernardino Ontario 10,614,109 11.75 6/30/1996
San Bernardino Rancho Cucamonga 2,726,555 10.00 4/6/1983 San Bernardino Redlands 1,834,855 10.00 12/5/1998
San Bernardino Rialto 344,527 9.00 1/18/1991
12/9/2022 Page 9 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
San Bernardino San Bernardino 5,117,388 10.00 8/1/1990
San Bernardino Twentynine Palms 1,927,425 9.00 1/1/2000 San Bernardino Upland 195,619 10.00 7/1/1994
San Bernardino Victorville 1,899,038 7.00 1/1/1980
San Bernardino Yucaipa 22,299 7.00 3/8/1999
San Bernardino Yucca Valley 1,926,447 7.00 8/31/1998
San Diego Carlsbad 15,583,688 10.00 1/1/1990
San Diego Chula Vista 5,270,799 10.00 4/1/1995
San Diego Coronado 9,595,095 10.00 1/1/2013
San Diego Del Mar 1,792,090 12.50 10/6/2015
San Diego El Cajon 2,126,234 10.00 4/1/1993
San Diego Encinitas 2,823,055 10.00 1/1/2009
San Diego Escondido 1,684,318 10.00 1/15/1994
San Diego Imperial Beach 904,038 10.00 7/1/1990
San Diego La Mesa 1,017,409 10.00 1/1/1991
San Diego Lemon Grove 65,549 6.00 7/1/2007
San Diego National City 1,600,549 10.00 7/1/1992
San Diego Oceanside 9,282,023 10.00 5/15/1993
San Diego Poway 403,071 10.00 12/13/2002
San Diego San Diego 128,309,913 10.50 8/1/1994
San Diego San Marcos 871,393 10.00 7/12/1998
San Diego Santee 600,220 10.00 12/12/2012
San Diego Solana Beach 1,457,156 13.00 1/1/2009
San Diego Vista 1,501,801 10.00 11/16/1990
San Francisco San Francisco 37,698,007 14.00 8/1/1996
San Joaquin Escalon 8,041 10.00 1/1/1995
San Joaquin Lathrop 655,538 9.00 4/21/1992
San Joaquin Lodi 899,934 6.00 7/1/2003
San Joaquin Manteca 1,077,417 9.00 8/20/1990
San Joaquin Ripon 436,256 10.00 7/2/2002
San Joaquin Stockton 2,860,447 8.00 7/1/2006
San Joaquin Tracy 1,702,313 10.00 12/1/1990
San Luis Obispo Arroyo Grande 1,028,718 10.00 1/10/2001 San Luis Obispo Atascadero 1,385,896 13.50 7/1/2020
San Luis Obispo El Paso De Robles 7,163,081 10.00 7/1/2015 San Luis Obispo Grover Beach 580,423 10.00 9/2/1991
San Luis Obispo Morro Bay 4,881,545 10.00 12/3/1996
San Luis Obispo Pismo Beach 14,209,579 11.00 1/1/2021
San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 6,960,035 10.00 10/1/1983 San Mateo Atherton - - -
San Mateo Belmont 1,320,865 10.00 6/26/1978
12/9/2022 Page 10 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
San Mateo Brisbane 849,788 12.00 1/1/2010
San Mateo Burlingame 5,738,588 12.00 1/1/2010
San Mateo Colma* - 12.00 1/1/2019
San Mateo Daly City 702,227 12.00 1/1/2019
San Mateo East Palo Alto 190,964 12.00 11/3/1998
San Mateo Foster City 992,616 12.00 7/1/2019
San Mateo Half Moon Bay 4,817,532 12.00 7/1/2008
San Mateo Hillsborough - - -
San Mateo Menlo Park 3,762,410 12.00 1/1/2013
San Mateo Millbrae 2,277,914 12.00 1/1/2010
San Mateo Pacifica 1,531,550 12.00 7/1/2011
San Mateo Portola Valley - - -
San Mateo Redwood City 1,987,722 12.00 1/1/2012
San Mateo San Bruno 1,247,467 14.00 3/1/2021
San Mateo San Carlos 1,200,905 13.00 1/1/2021
San Mateo San Mateo 1,115,056 14.00 1/1/2021
San Mateo South San Francisco 6,710,271 13.00 1/1/2020
San Mateo Woodside - - -
Santa Barbara Buellton 3,020,078 12.00 2/1/2013
Santa Barbara Carpinteria 2,209,191 12.00 1/1/2013
Santa Barbara Goleta 9,239,079 12.00 1/1/2013
Santa Barbara Guadalupe* - 6.00 6/26/1978
Santa Barbara Lompoc 1,664,939 10.00 6/1/1984
Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 18,807,331 12.00 1/1/2001
Santa Barbara Santa Maria 3,211,731 10.00 12/5/1991
Santa Barbara Solvang 4,078,826 12.00 7/1/2015
Santa Clara Campbell 1,568,908 12.00 1/1/2011
Santa Clara Cupertino 2,141,058 12.00 1/1/2012
Santa Clara Gilroy 1,105,300 9.00 8/1/1983
Santa Clara Los Altos 662,132 11.00 7/1/2017
Santa Clara Los Altos Hills - - -
Santa Clara Los Gatos 1,044,820 10.00 2/3/1993
Santa Clara Milpitas 4,213,814 14.00 1/3/2019
Santa Clara Monte Sereno - - -
Santa Clara Morgan Hill 1,299,126 11.00 3/1/2019
Santa Clara Mountain View 1,917,636 10.00 7/10/1991
Santa Clara Palo Alto 5,178,992 15.50 4/1/2019
Santa Clara San Jose 13,489,593 10.00 3/19/1985
Santa Clara Santa Clara 2,949,235 9.50 7/1/1992
Santa Clara Saratoga 168,178 10.00 1/1/2002
Santa Clara Sunnyvale 5,192,090 12.50 1/1/2019
12/9/2022 Page 11 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Santa Cruz Capitola 1,529,015 12.00 1/1/2019
Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 9,121,782 11.00 7/1/2013
Santa Cruz Scotts Valley 1,261,100 11.00 1/1/2019
Santa Cruz Watsonville 910,968 11.00 11/2/2016
Shasta Anderson 647,746 10.00 9/20/1994
Shasta Redding 6,222,974 10.00 7/1/1982
Shasta Shasta Lake 7,699 10.00 7/2/1993
Sierra Loyalton - - -
Siskiyou Dorris 5,666 5.00 8/14/1993
Siskiyou Dunsmuir 274,327 10.00 7/1/2014
Siskiyou Etna 10,036 6.00 1/1/1983
Siskiyou Fort Jones - - -
Siskiyou Montague - - -
Siskiyou Mt. Shasta 1,037,318 10.00 7/1/1996
Siskiyou Tulelake - - -
Siskiyou Weed 396,343 12.00 7/1/2015
Siskiyou Yreka 1,201,141 10.00 3/2/2004
Solano Benicia 411,411 9.00 9/7/1993
Solano Dixon 418,098 9.00 1/1/1990
Solano Fairfield 2,422,251 10.00 10/1/1984
Solano Rio Vista 20,563 10.00 12/1/2006
Solano Suisun City 273,720 10.00 5/1/1991
Solano Vacaville 1,471,573 8.00 11/1/1998
Solano Vallejo 1,578,486 11.00 7/1/1991
Sonoma Cloverdale 194,197 10.00 1/1/1993
Sonoma Cotati* - 10.00 1/1/1998
Sonoma Healdsburg 4,750,888 14.00 1/1/2017
Sonoma Petaluma 2,131,357 10.00 11/5/1990
Sonoma Rohnert Park 3,134,882 12.00 1/1/2003
Sonoma Santa Rosa 3,675,706 9.00 1/1/1994
Sonoma Sebastopol 402,255 12.00 4/1/2019
Sonoma Sonoma 2,840,512 13.00 9/1/2019
Sonoma Windsor 1,579,291 12.00 12/12/2008
Stanislaus Ceres 338,124 10.00 7/1/2016
Stanislaus Hughson - - -
Stanislaus Modesto 2,850,231 9.00 4/1/1987
Stanislaus Newman - - -
Stanislaus Oakdale 347,359 7.00 11/3/1987
Stanislaus Patterson 246,726 8.00 10/1/1986
Stanislaus Riverbank* - 4.00 12/13/1965
Stanislaus Turlock 1,757,476 9.00 11/26/1991
12/9/2022 Page 12 of 12
California Cities
Transient Occupancy Taxes Revenue, Tax Rate, and Effective Date Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City *
Transient
Occupancy
Taxes ($)
Tax
Rate
(%)
Effective
Date
Stanislaus Waterford* - 8.00 9/1/1995
Sutter Live Oak - - -
Sutter Yuba City 1,167,422 10.00 1/19/2001
Tehama Corning 415,518 10.00 4/1/1994
Tehama Red Bluff 1,174,303 10.00 10/1/1991
Tehama Tehama - - -
Tulare Dinuba 266,474 10.00 3/4/1995
Tulare Exeter 121,420 8.00 1/1/2013
Tulare Farmersville - - -
Tulare Lindsay 98,618 8.00 3/1/1986
Tulare Porterville 764,374 8.00 10/2/1990
Tulare Tulare 1,565,612 10.00 7/1/2002
Tulare Visalia 3,323,538 10.00 11/1/1993
Tulare Woodlake - - -
Tuolumne Sonora 397,619 12.00 2/1/2021
Ventura Camarillo 2,149,677 9.00 9/14/1988
Ventura Fillmore 86,244 10.00 5/22/1986
Ventura Moorpark 176,235 10.00 9/19/2007
Ventura Ojai 5,169,345 15.00 6/1/2020
Ventura Oxnard 4,267,463 10.00 6/16/1998
Ventura Port Hueneme 468,607 10.00 1/1/1980
Ventura San Buenaventura 5,021,768 10.00 6/30/1986
Ventura Santa Paula 84,317 10.00 11/21/1994
Ventura Simi Valley 1,335,406 10.00 10/20/1994
Ventura Thousand Oaks 2,712,668 10.00 12/1/1987
Yolo Davis 1,580,278 12.00 8/1/2016
Yolo West Sacramento 1,298,340 12.00 1/1/2005
Yolo Winters 266,264 12.00 7/1/2014
Yolo Woodland 1,086,537 12.00 7/1/2017
Yuba Marysville 162,192 10.00 1/1/1993
Yuba Wheatland - - -
$ 1,299,716,160
* City currently has no hotels/motels, but has a current tax rate and effective date.

Source: Office of the State Controller
Local Government Programs and Services Division
Local Government Reporting Section - City Report
12/9/2022 Page 1 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Alameda Alameda 9,091,389 7.50
Alameda Albany 1,606,874 7.00
Alameda Berkeley 13,876,525 7.50
Alameda Dublin - -
Alameda Emeryville 3,030,308 5.50
Alameda Fremont - -
Alameda Hayward 17,267,592 5.50
Alameda Livermore - -
Alameda Newark 3,366,768 3.25
Alameda Oakland 51,801,434 7.50
Alameda Piedmont 1,192,997 7.50
Alameda Pleasanton - -
Alameda San Leandro 10,830,889 6.00
Alameda Union City 1,026,166 5.00
Amador Amador - -
Amador Ione - -
Amador Jackson - -
Amador Plymouth - -
Amador Sutter Creek - -
Butte Biggs - -
Butte Chico 8,119,022 5.00
Butte Gridley - -
Butte Oroville 2,318,054 5.00
Butte Paradise - -
Calaveras Angels - -
Colusa Colusa - -
Colusa Williams - -
Contra Costa Antioch - -
Contra Costa Brentwood - -
Contra Costa Clayton - -
Contra Costa Concord - -
Contra Costa Danville - -
Contra Costa El Cerrito 3,670,333 8.00
Contra Costa Hercules 3,590,649 8.00
Contra Costa Lafayette - -
Contra Costa Martinez - -
Contra Costa Moraga - -
Contra Costa Oakley - -
Contra Costa Orinda - -
12/9/2022 Page 2 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Contra Costa Pinole 2,200,156 8.00
Contra Costa Pittsburg - -
Contra Costa Pleasant Hill 64,658 1.00
Contra Costa Richmond 45,240,705 10.00
Contra Costa San Pablo 2,731,594 7.00
Contra Costa San Ramon - -
Contra Costa Walnut Creek - -
Del Norte Crescent City - -
El Dorado Placerville - -
El Dorado South Lake Tahoe - -
Fresno Clovis - -
Fresno Coalinga - -
Fresno Firebaugh 1,004,161 10.00
Fresno Fowler 429,638 5.00
Fresno Fresno - -
Fresno Huron 183,496 4.00
Fresno Kerman - -
Fresno Kingsburg - -
Fresno Mendota - -
Fresno Orange Cove 561,421 7.00
Fresno Parlier - -
Fresno Reedley - -
Fresno San Joaquin - -
Fresno Sanger 1,702,647 5.00
Fresno Selma - -
Glenn Orland - -
Glenn Willows - -
Humboldt Arcata 1,353,121 3.00
Humboldt Blue Lake 4,073 4.00
Humboldt Eureka - -
Humboldt Ferndale - -
Humboldt Fortuna - -
Humboldt Rio Dell - -
Humboldt Trinidad - -
Imperial Brawley 2,119,966 4.00
Imperial Calexico - -
Imperial Calipatria - -
Imperial El Centro - -
Imperial Holtville 433,750 5.00
12/9/2022 Page 3 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Imperial Imperial - -
Imperial Westmorland - -
Inyo Bishop - -
Kern Arvin - -
Kern Bakersfield - -
Kern California City - -
Kern Delano - -
Kern Maricopa - -
Kern McFarland - -
Kern Ridgecrest - -
Kern Shafter - -
Kern Taft - -
Kern Tehachapi - -
Kern Wasco - -
Kings Avenal - -
Kings Corcoran - -
Kings Hanford - -
Kings Lemoore - -
Lake Clearlake - -
Lake Lakeport - -
Lassen Susanville - -
Los Angeles Agoura Hills - -
Los Angeles Alhambra 3,849,399 5.00
Los Angeles Arcadia 13,732,171 7.00
Los Angeles Artesia - -
Los Angeles Avalon - -
Los Angeles Azusa 3,379,352 4.00
Los Angeles Baldwin Park 2,574,020 3.00
Los Angeles Bell 3,103,444 10.00
Los Angeles Bell Gardens - -
Los Angeles Bellflower 2,946,025 5.00
Los Angeles Beverly Hills - -
Los Angeles Bradbury - -
Los Angeles Burbank 15,595,788 7.00
Los Angeles Calabasas 3,001,516 5.00
Los Angeles Carson 8,670,112 2.00
Los Angeles Cerritos - -
Los Angeles Claremont 4,367,505 5.50
Los Angeles Commerce - -
12/9/2022 Page 4 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Los Angeles Compton 12,225,353 10.00
Los Angeles Covina 4,847,226 6.00
Los Angeles Cudahy 1,119,043 8.00
Los Angeles Culver City 13,184,794 11.00
Los Angeles Diamond Bar - -
Los Angeles Downey 6,616,834 5.00
Los Angeles Duarte - -
Los Angeles El Monte 6,235,002 7.00
Los Angeles El Segundo 10,694,149 3.00
Los Angeles Gardena 4,970,799 5.00
Los Angeles Glendale 26,114,114 7.00
Los Angeles Glendora - -
Los Angeles Hawaiian Gardens - -
Los Angeles Hawthorne 6,837,852 5.00
Los Angeles Hermosa Beach 2,171,538 5.50
Los Angeles Hidden Hills - -
Los Angeles Huntington Park 4,452,896 9.75
Los Angeles Industry - -
Los Angeles Inglewood 15,442,054 8.00
Los Angeles Irwindale 3,396,621 7.50
Los Angeles La Canada Flintridge - -
Los Angeles La Habra Heights - -
Los Angeles La Mirada - -
Los Angeles La Puente - -
Los Angeles La Verne 2,870,574 6.00
Los Angeles Lakewood 3,034,417 3.00
Los Angeles Lancaster - -
Los Angeles Lawndale 1,734,031 5.50
Los Angeles Lomita - -
Los Angeles Long Beach 38,546,021 5.00
Los Angeles Los Angeles 610,946,295 10.00
Los Angeles Lynwood 5,225,838 9.00
Los Angeles Malibu 2,361,337 5.00
Los Angeles Manhattan Beach - -
Los Angeles Maywood 1,118,937 4.00
Los Angeles Monrovia - -
Los Angeles Montebello - -
Los Angeles Monterey Park 2,931,943 3.00
Los Angeles Norwalk 4,454,135 5.50
12/9/2022 Page 5 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Los Angeles Palmdale - -
Los Angeles Palos Verdes Estates - -
Los Angeles Paramount 3,261,854 5.50
Los Angeles Pasadena 26,937,888 8.28
Los Angeles Pico Rivera 3,157,258 4.50
Los Angeles Pomona 16,542,842 9.00
Los Angeles Rancho Palos Verdes 2,245,825 3.00
Los Angeles Redondo Beach 6,713,480 4.75
Los Angeles Rolling Hills - -
Los Angeles Rolling Hills Estates - -
Los Angeles Rosemead - -
Los Angeles San Dimas - -
Los Angeles San Fernando - -
Los Angeles San Gabriel 4,251,197 8.00
Los Angeles San Marino 1,803,909 5.00
Los Angeles Santa Clarita - -
Los Angeles Santa Fe Springs 6,618,376 5.00
Los Angeles Santa Monica 27,840,035 10.00
Los Angeles Sierra Madre 2,809,894 10.00
Los Angeles Signal Hill - -
Los Angeles South El Monte - -
Los Angeles South Gate - -
Los Angeles South Pasadena 3,738,530 7.50
Los Angeles Temple City - -
Los Angeles Torrance 31,644,428 6.50
Los Angeles Vernon 12,367,272 6.00
Los Angeles Walnut - -
Los Angeles West Covina - -
Los Angeles West Hollywood - -
Los Angeles Westlake Village - -
Los Angeles Whittier 7,307,020 5.00
Madera Chowchilla - -
Madera Madera - -
Marin Belvedere - -
Marin Corte Madera - -
Marin Fairfax 342,333 4.00
Marin Larkspur - -
Marin Mill Valley - -
Marin Novato - -
12/9/2022 Page 6 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Marin Ross - -
Marin San Anselmo - -
Marin San Rafael - -
Marin Sausalito - -
Marin Tiburon - -
Mendocino Fort Bragg - -
Mendocino Point Arena - -
Mendocino Ukiah - -
Mendocino Willits - -
Merced Atwater - -
Merced Dos Palos - -
Merced Gustine 291,967 2.50
Merced Livingston - -
Merced Los Banos - -
Merced Merced - -
Modoc Alturas - -
Mono Mammoth Lakes 856,613 3.50
Monterey Carmel-By-The-Sea - -
Monterey Del Rey Oaks - -
Monterey Gonzales 233,913 4.00
Monterey Greenfield 332,968 3.00
Monterey King City 341,970 2.00
Monterey Marina - -
Monterey Monterey 3,654,753 2.00
Monterey Pacific Grove 1,858,652 8.75
Monterey Salinas 11,608,242 6.00
Monterey Sand City 148,887 5.00
Monterey Seaside 2,803,551 6.00
Monterey Soledad 717,911 5.00
Napa American Canyon - -
Napa Calistoga - -
Napa Napa - -
Napa St. Helena - -
Napa Yountville - -
Nevada Grass Valley - -
Nevada Nevada City - -
Nevada Truckee - -
Orange Aliso Viejo - -
Orange Anaheim - -
12/9/2022 Page 7 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Orange Brea - -
Orange Buena Park 2,609,338 3.00
Orange Costa Mesa - -
Orange Cypress - -
Orange Dana Point - -
Orange Fountain Valley - -
Orange Fullerton - -
Orange Garden Grove - -
Orange Huntington Beach 18,374,351 5.00
Orange Irvine 4,775,611 1.50
Orange La Habra - -
Orange La Palma 957,702 5.00
Orange Laguna Beach - -
Orange Laguna Hills - -
Orange Laguna Niguel - -
Orange Laguna Woods - -
Orange Lake Forest - -
Orange Los Alamitos 1,834,204 5.00
Orange Mission Viejo - -
Orange Newport Beach - -
Orange Orange - -
Orange Placentia 2,502,705 3.50
Orange Rancho Santa Margarita - -
Orange San Clemente - -
Orange San Juan Capistrano - -
Orange Santa Ana 22,651,431 5.50
Orange Seal Beach 4,129,727 10.00
Orange Stanton 1,990,690 5.00
Orange Tustin - -
Orange Villa Park - -
Orange Westminster 4,464,874 4.00
Orange Yorba Linda - -
Placer Auburn - -
Placer Colfax - -
Placer Lincoln - -
Placer Loomis - -
Placer Rocklin - -
Placer Roseville - -
Plumas Portola - -
12/9/2022 Page 8 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Riverside Banning - -
Riverside Beaumont 1,887,031 3.00
Riverside Blythe - -
Riverside Calimesa - -
Riverside Canyon Lake 1,023,300 3.95
Riverside Cathedral City 2,939,711 3.00
Riverside Coachella 2,413,772 5.00
Riverside Corona - -
Riverside Desert Hot Springs 3,678,724 7.00
Riverside Eastvale - -
Riverside Hemet - -
Riverside Indian Wells - -
Riverside Indio 8,417,319 6.00
Riverside Jurupa Valley - -
Riverside La Quinta - -
Riverside Lake Elsinore - -
Riverside Menifee - -
Riverside Moreno Valley 16,361,233 5.75
Riverside Murrieta - -
Riverside Norco - -
Riverside Palm Desert - -
Riverside Palm Springs 8,284,837 5.00
Riverside Perris - -
Riverside Rancho Mirage - -
Riverside Riverside 30,602,607 6.50
Riverside San Jacinto - -
Riverside Temecula - -
Riverside Wildomar - -
Sacramento Citrus Heights 2,717,945 2.50
Sacramento Elk Grove 6,168,692 2.25
Sacramento Folsom - -
Sacramento Galt - -
Sacramento Isleton - -
Sacramento Rancho Cordova 3,558,251 2.50
Sacramento Sacramento 62,164,000 7.50
San Benito Hollister - -
San Benito San Juan Bautista - -
San Bernardino Adelanto - -
San Bernardino Apple Valley - -
12/9/2022 Page 9 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
San Bernardino Barstow - -
San Bernardino Big Bear Lake - -
San Bernardino Chino - -
San Bernardino Chino Hills - -
San Bernardino Colton - -
San Bernardino Fontana - -
San Bernardino Grand Terrace - -
San Bernardino Hesperia - -
San Bernardino Highland - -
San Bernardino Loma Linda - -
San Bernardino Montclair 1,784,464 3.89
San Bernardino Needles 253,396 2.50
San Bernardino Ontario - -
San Bernardino Rancho Cucamonga - -
San Bernardino Redlands - -
San Bernardino Rialto 14,470,386 8.00
San Bernardino San Bernardino 23,609,073 7.75
San Bernardino Twentynine Palms 169,582 9.00
San Bernardino Upland - -
San Bernardino Victorville - -
San Bernardino Yucaipa - -
San Bernardino Yucca Valley - -
San Diego Carlsbad - -
San Diego Chula Vista 3,915,862 4.75
San Diego Coronado - -
San Diego Del Mar - -
San Diego El Cajon - -
San Diego Encinitas - -
San Diego Escondido - -
San Diego Imperial Beach - -
San Diego La Mesa - -
San Diego Lemon Grove - -
San Diego National City - -
San Diego Oceanside - -
San Diego Poway - -
San Diego San Diego - -
San Diego San Marcos - -
San Diego Santee - -
San Diego Solana Beach - -
12/9/2022 Page 10 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
San Diego Vista - -
San Francisco San Francisco 81,366,566 7.50
San Joaquin Escalon - -
San Joaquin Lathrop - -
San Joaquin Lodi - -
San Joaquin Manteca - -
San Joaquin Ripon - -
San Joaquin Stockton 36,413,826 6.00
San Joaquin Tracy - -
San Luis Obispo Arroyo Grande - -
San Luis Obispo Atascadero - -
San Luis Obispo El Paso De Robles - -
San Luis Obispo Grover Beach 184,866 1.00
San Luis Obispo Morro Bay - -
San Luis Obispo Pismo Beach - -
San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 5,225,979 5.00
San Mateo Atherton - -
San Mateo Belmont - -
San Mateo Brisbane - -
San Mateo Burlingame - -
San Mateo Colma - -
San Mateo Daly City 5,912,945 5.00
San Mateo East Palo Alto 1,630,879 5.00
San Mateo Foster City - -
San Mateo Half Moon Bay - -
San Mateo Hillsborough - -
San Mateo Menlo Park 1,442,005 1.00
San Mateo Millbrae - -
San Mateo Pacifica 2,146,229 6.50
San Mateo Portola Valley 639,459 4.50
San Mateo Redwood City 9,295,821 5.00
San Mateo San Bruno - -
San Mateo San Carlos - -
San Mateo San Mateo - -
San Mateo South San Francisco - -
San Mateo Woodside - -
Santa Barbara Buellton - -
Santa Barbara Carpinteria - -
Santa Barbara Goleta - -
12/9/2022 Page 11 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Santa Barbara Guadalupe 480,619 5.00
Santa Barbara Lompoc - -
Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 14,673,886 6.00
Santa Barbara Santa Maria - -
Santa Barbara Solvang - -
Santa Clara Campbell - -
Santa Clara Cupertino 3,074,358 2.40
Santa Clara Gilroy 4,400,682 5.00
Santa Clara Los Altos 2,917,252 3.50
Santa Clara Los Altos Hills - -
Santa Clara Los Gatos - -
Santa Clara Milpitas - -
Santa Clara Monte Sereno - -
Santa Clara Morgan Hill - -
Santa Clara Mountain View 7,653,638 3.00
Santa Clara Palo Alto 14,641,911 5.00
Santa Clara San Jose 127,843,629 5.00
Santa Clara Santa Clara - -
Santa Clara Saratoga - -
Santa Clara Sunnyvale 8,590,351 2.00
Santa Cruz Capitola - -
Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 12,070,520 8.50
Santa Cruz Scotts Valley 828,420 4.00
Santa Cruz Watsonville 3,993,803 6.00
Shasta Anderson - -
Shasta Redding - -
Shasta Shasta Lake - -
Sierra Loyalton - -
Siskiyou Dorris - -
Siskiyou Dunsmuir - -
Siskiyou Etna - -
Siskiyou Fort Jones - -
Siskiyou Montague - -
Siskiyou Mt. Shasta - -
Siskiyou Tulelake - -
Siskiyou Weed - -
Siskiyou Yreka - -
Solano Benicia 4,933,493 4.00
Solano Dixon - -
12/9/2022 Page 12 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Solano Fairfield 4,486,741 2.00
Solano Rio Vista - -
Solano Suisun City - -
Solano Vacaville - -
Solano Vallejo 13,005,333 7.50
Sonoma Cloverdale 478,432 3.00
Sonoma Cotati - -
Sonoma Healdsburg - -
Sonoma Petaluma - -
Sonoma Rohnert Park - -
Sonoma Santa Rosa 11,467,876 5.00
Sonoma Sebastopol 697,571 3.75
Sonoma Sonoma - -
Sonoma Windsor - -
Stanislaus Ceres 1,323,030 3.00
Stanislaus Hughson - -
Stanislaus Modesto 20,764,694 6.00
Stanislaus Newman - -
Stanislaus Oakdale - -
Stanislaus Patterson - -
Stanislaus Riverbank - -
Stanislaus Turlock - -
Stanislaus Waterford 616,559 6.00
Sutter Live Oak - -
Sutter Yuba City - -
Tehama Corning - -
Tehama Red Bluff - -
Tehama Tehama - -
Tulare Dinuba 1,668,455 7.00
Tulare Exeter 632,623 5.00
Tulare Farmersville - -
Tulare Lindsay 957,350 6.00
Tulare Porterville 4,251,538 6.00
Tulare Tulare 6,272,932 6.00
Tulare Visalia - -
Tulare Woodlake 371,637 6.00
Tuolumne Sonora - -
Ventura Camarillo - -
Ventura Fillmore - -
12/9/2022 Page 13 of 13
California Cities
Utility Users Taxes Revenue and Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2020-21
(Including the City and County of San Francisco)
County City Utility Users
Taxes ($) Tax Rate (%)
Ventura Moorpark - -
Ventura Ojai - -
Ventura Oxnard - -
Ventura Port Hueneme 1,060,085 4.00
Ventura San Buenaventura 7,891,700 5.00
Ventura Santa Paula - -
Ventura Simi Valley - -
Ventura Thousand Oaks - -
Yolo Davis - -
Yolo West Sacramento - -
Yolo Winters 762,107 9.50
Yolo Woodland - -
Yuba Marysville - -
Yuba Wheatland - -
$ 1,907,781,707
Source: Office of the State Controller
Local Government Programs and Services Division
Local Government Reporting Section - City
City of
Sutter Creek
Submitted to:

City of Sutter Creek
18 Main Street
Sutter Creek, CA 95685
501 Canal Boulevard Suite I Richmond CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 Phone / (510) 215-2898 Fax
NCE Project No. 749.01.55 October 2015
Pavement Management
Program Update Report

City of
Sutter Creek
501 Canal Boulevard Suite I Richmond CA 94804
(510) 215-3620 Phone / (510) 215-2898 Fax
NCE Project No. 749.01.55 October 2015
Pavement Management
Program Update Report
Submitted to:

City of Sutter Creek
18 Main Street
Sutter Creek, CA 95685

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
i
Table of Contents
Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Network Description..................................................................................................................................... 3 Pavement Current Condition ........................................................................................................................ 4 Maintenance and Rehabilitation .................................................................................................................. 8 Budget Needs................................................................................................................................................ 9 Budget Scenarios.........................................................................................................................................10 Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget ($8.4 Million)..................................................................................11 Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 59 ($6.4 Million) ........................................................................................12 Scenario 3: Improve PCI to 75 ($8.4 Million or $8.7 Million)................................................................. 13 Scenario Comparisons.............................................................................................................................15 Summary .....................................................................................................................................................18 Recommendations......................................................................................................................................18 A. Pavement Budget ...............................................................................................................................18 B. Pavement Maintenance Strategies.....................................................................................................18 C. Re-inspection Strategies.....................................................................................................................18 D. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatment Strategies.....................................................................18 E. Next Steps...........................................................................................................................................19 Appendix A:

Section Description Inventory Report – Sorted by Street Name Section Description Inventory Report – Sorted by PCI (Descending)

Appendix B:

Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree
Appendix C:

Budget Needs – Projected PCI/Cost Summary Report
Budget Needs – Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary Report Budget Needs – Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary Report City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
ii
Scenarios 1 – 3:

Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report
Appendix D:

Section selected for Treatments – Scenario 1 to 3
Appendix E:

PCI Maps
Current Pavement Network Conditions
Pavement Network Condition Projections from Scenarios 1-3

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
iii
List of Tables
Table 1: Summary Statistics of Pavement Network..................................................................................... 3 Table 2: 2015 Pavement Condition Breakdowns by Area............................................................................ 5 Table 3: Summary Results from Needs Analysis for Streets........................................................................ 9 Table 4: Summary Results for Scenario 1...................................................................................................11 Table 5: Summary Results for Scenario 2...................................................................................................12 Table 6: Summary Results for Scenario 3A ................................................................................................13 Table 7: Summary Results for Scenario 3B ................................................................................................13 City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
iv
List of Figures
Figure 1: Pavement Condition Categories ................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2: Examples of Roads with Different PCIs......................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Pavement Condition Summary by Condition Categories (Streets by Area - 2015)...................... 6 Figure 4: Pavement Condition Summary by Functional Classification (Streets by Area - 2015) ................ 6 Figure 5: 2015 Pavement Condition Breakdowns for Neighboring Cities.................................................... 7 Figure 6: Costs of Maintaining Pavements over Time ................................................................................. 8 Figure 7: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1 ..............................................................................11 Figure 8: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2 ..............................................................................12 Figure 9: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3 ..............................................................................14 Figure 10: Annual Pavement Condition Index by Scenarios......................................................................15 Figure 11: Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenarios............................................................................16 Figure 12: Pavement Condition Changes for Scenarios 1 to 3..................................................................17 Figure 13: Asphalt Price Index (1999-2014, Caltrans) ................................................................................19 City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
1 Background
The City of Sutter Creek has maintained a pavement management program (PMP) since 1995 when Microsoft PMS Pro was utilized. In 2015, NCE was selected to convert to the StreetSaverTM PMP and update the database with current conditions.

Broadly, a “… pavement management [program] system is designed to provide objective information and useful data for analysis so that … managers can make more consistent, cost-effective, and defensible decisions related to the preservation of a pavement network.” 1 In other words, a PMP is designed to assist cities answer typical questions such as:
• What does the City’s road network consist of? How many miles of roads are eligible for federal, state or other funds?
• What is the existing condition of the City’s maintained roads? Is this an acceptable level for the City? If not, what is an acceptable level? How much additional funding is needed to achieve an acceptable level?
• Are there roads in specific areas that are much worse than others, and if so, how much worse? • How will the condition of the City’s maintained roads respond over time under existing funding levels?
• What maintenance and rehabilitation strategies exist to improve current road conditions? What maintenance activities or treatments have occurred in the past on any given road? • What impact would either additional funding or a decrease in funding, have on the condition of the overall pavement network?
• What is the backlog of maintenance and rehabilitative work that should be done? What are the future maintenance and rehabilitation needs? Are there different needs for different classes of roads i.e. arterials vs. local residentials?
• Under different funding levels, what is the most cost-effective way to implement a multi-year capital improvement program? Maintenance work program?
• What are the road repair priorities, given different budgeting scenarios? In order to answer the questions above, the City made the decision to convert to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s) StreetSaverTM pavement management system.

NCE next updated the City’s database by performing field condition surveys of the City’s entire pavement network (14.86 centerline miles). The network consists of 2.58 centerline miles of collectors, and 12.28 centerline miles of local streets. Field surveys were completed in May 2015 and all survey data have been entered into the City’s StreetSaver database.

1 AASHTO “Guidelines for Pavement Management Systems”. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, July 1990.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
2 City’s maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) decision tree and unit cost were also updated in StreetSaver. Pavement overlay and slurry seal histories from 2009 to 2012 were imported into the database.

Finally, the pavement funding needs were determined, and four budgetary scenarios were analyzed for the pavement network.

Purpose
The purpose of this report is to assist decision makers at the City of Sutter Creek in utilizing the results of the StreetSaver Pavement Management Program (PMP). Specifically, this report links the PMP recommended repair program costs to the City’s current budget and projected budget alternatives to improve overall maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. This report assesses the adequacy of ideal and projected revenues to meet the maintenance needs recommended by the PMP program. It also maximizes the returns from expenditures by:
1) Implementing a multi-year street rehabilitation and maintenance program; 2) Developing a preventive maintenance program; and
3) Selecting the most cost effective repairs.

This report assists the City with identifying maintenance priorities specific to its needs. It examines the overall condition of the street network and highlights options for improving the current network level pavement condition index (PCI). These options were developed through "what-if" analyses. By varying the budget amounts available for pavement maintenance and repair, one can show how different funding strategies affect the City's streets over the next twenty years.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
3 Network Description
As noted earlier, the City of Sutter Creek oversees the repair and maintenance of approximately 15 centerline miles of pavement, or 126 pavement sections. Table 1 below summarizes the entire pavement network by functional class.

Table 1: Summary Statistics of Pavement Network
The network replacement value is estimated to be approximately $8.8 million. This is the amount needed to fund the full reconstruction of the City’s pavement network and does not include related infrastructure assets such as sidewalks, signals, markings, signs etc.

A listing of all streets in the network and their corresponding pavement condition index (PCI) at the time of inspection and other attribute data is included in Appendix A. For convenience, there are two listings – one sorted by street name and the other sorted by descending PCI. A PCI map of the entire street network is included in Appendix E.

Functional Class Sections Centerline Miles Lane Miles
% of the Entire
Network
(by Pavement Area)
Collectors 11 2.58 5.25 19.0
Local/Residential 115 12.28 24.02 81.0
Total 126 14.86 29.27 100%
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
4 Pavement Current Condition
The pavement condition index, or PCI, is a measurement of the pavement condition and ranges from zero to 100. A newly constructed street will have a PCI of 100, while a failed street will have a PCI of 25 or less. The pavement condition is primarily affected by the climate, traffic loads and volumes, construction materials and age. The symptoms manifested by the pavement as it ages or fails are determined by the distress types that are present, which include:

1. Alligator (fatigue) cracking

2. Block cracking

3. Distortions

4. Longitudinal and transverse cracking

5. Patching and utility cut patching

6. Rutting and depressions

7. Weathering and raveling
A more detailed description of each distress type is available in the MTC distress manual2 .

Figure 1 below illustrates the definitions of the five pavement condition categories. The “fair” category includes roads with both non-load related (weathering and raveling) and load related (e.g. alligator cracking) distresses. Since these distresses are markedly different, the treatments assigned are also correspondingly different, and the costs associated with them. Generally, roads with load-related will require higher costs for repairs. The two categories are identified by II (non-load related) and III (load related). The StreetSaver program will assign the appropriate treatments and costs to roads identified with each category. Note that the StreetSaver “Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree” in Appendix B assigns different condition category titles from those in Figure 1. 100
I Good
70 II/III Fair
(non-load)
Fair
(load-related) 50
IV Poor
25 V Very Poor/Failed
0 Condition
Category Pavement Condition PCI
Figure 1: Pavement Condition Categories
2 “Pavement Condition Index Distress Identification Manual for Asphalt and Surface Treatment Pavements”. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, CA, April, 2012.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
5 The photos in Figure 2 illustrate roads with a range of PCIs.

Figure 2: Examples of Roads with Different PCIs
The average 2015 PCI of the City’s entire street network is 59. Note that these values are projected and area-weighted calculations from StreetSaver. The remaining service life (RSL) is estimated to be approximately 17 years for the streets (this is the average time required for pavements to reach a “Very Poor/Failed” condition if no maintenance occurs).

Table 2 and Figures 3 to 4 detail the pavement condition breakdown for the streets by PCI ranges or condition category. Around 38% of the entire City’s streets for 2015 are in the “Good” condition category. Unfortunately, 41.4% of the pavement area falls in the “Poor” or “Very Poor/Failed” condition categories.

Table 2: 2015 Pavement Condition Breakdowns by Area
Condition Category PCI
Range
Collector
(%)
Residential
/Local
(%)
Entire
Network
(%)
Good (I) 70-100 4.8 33.7 38.5
Fair (II/III) 50-69 5.8 14.3 20.1
Poor (IV) 25-49 6.0 28.7 34.7
Very Poor/Failed (V) <25 2.4 4.3 6.7
Total 19.0% 81.0% 100%
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
6 Figure 3: Pavement Condition Summary by Condition Categories (Streets by Area - 2015)
Figure 4: Pavement Condition Summary by Functional Classification (Streets by Area - 2015)
To compare the City’s PCI with other neighboring cities, data from the 2014 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment3 survey was used. The results are shown in Figure 5 on the next page and as can be seen, the City has a pavement condition that is in the bottom third of the range. 3 “California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment 2014 Update”. Nichols Consulting Engineers Chtd, CA, October 2014.

Good/Very
Good

38.5%
Fair

20.1%
Poor

34.7%
Very
Poor/Failed

6.7%
Collector,
PCI=52
Residential,
PCI=60
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
7 Figure 5: 2015 Pavement Condition Breakdowns for Neighboring Cities City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
8 Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Historically, the City has only utilized a program of hot mix asphalt (HMA) overlays as maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. Surface treatments, such as slurry seals, are often utilized as a preventive maintenance technique when the pavements are in “Good” condition or above. As the pavement condition deteriorates, thin and thick asphalt overlays, typically with milling, are applied. Digouts are typically used as preparation prior to overlays and surface seals as necessary. These pavement treatments are formalized in the maintenance and rehabilitation Decision Tree shown in Appendix B.

All available data from past historical records were entered into the StreetSaver database and the data used to develop custom prediction models so that projected, or future conditions can be predicted.

Figure 6 below demonstrates that pavement maintenance follows the old colloquial saying of "pay me now, or pay me more later”. History has shown that it costs much less to maintain streets in good condition than to repair streets that have failed. By allowing pavements to deteriorate, streets that once cost $2.50 per square yard ($/sy) to surface seal may soon cost $22.50/sy to overlay or $40.00/sy to reconstruct. In other words, significant delays in repairs can cost over 16 times more.

Figure 6: Costs of Maintaining Pavements over Time
Good
Fair
Poor
Very Poor
Excellent
Failed
40% 75% 90%
Surface Seal
$2.50/sy
Chip or Cape Seal
$6.00 - $6.50/sy

1.5” AC Overlay w/Digouts
$22.50/sy
FDR or Reconstruction
$30.00 - $40.00/sy
% of Pavement Life
Pavement Condition
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
9 Budget Needs
Based on the principle that it costs less to maintain streets in good condition than those listed in bad condition, the PMP strives to develop a maintenance strategy that will improve the overall condition of the network to an optimal PCI and then sustain it at that level. By not addressing the maintenance needs, the quality of the street network will inevitably decline. In order to correct these deficiencies, the implementation of a cost effective funding and maintenance and rehabilitation strategy is necessary.

The first step in developing a cost effective maintenance and rehabilitation strategy is to determine the maintenance "needs" of the pavement network. Using the StreetSaver budget needs module with an inflation rate of 5.0%, the maintenance needs over the next twenty years were estimated at approximately $8.4 million for the streets. If the City follows the strategy recommended by the program, the average street PCI will increase to the high-70s to low-80s (considered to be a “state of good repair”) over 20 years. If, however, no maintenance is applied over the next twenty years, already distressed streets will continue to deteriorate, and the street PCI will drop to 22 by 2034. The results of the budget needs analysis are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: Summary Results from Needs Analysis for Streets Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total PCI Untreated 59 57 55 52 50 48 46 44 42 39 -
PCI Treated 71 70 72 71 76 79 80 80 81 82 -
Needs ($Millions) 1.5 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 - Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
PCI Untreated 37 35 33 31 29 27 26 24 23 22 -
PCI Treated 81 80 80 79 79 79 80 79 79 78 -
Needs ($Millions) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 8.4 The budget needs analysis represent the ideal funding strategy recommended by the StreetSaver PMP.

Of the approximately $8.4 million in maintenance needs shown, approximately $1.5 million (18%) is earmarked for preventive maintenance or life extending treatments, while $6.9 million (82%) is allocated for the more costly rehabilitation and reconstruction treatments.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
10 Budget Scenarios
Having determined the maintenance needs of the streets, the next step in developing a cost effective maintenance and rehabilitation strategy is to conduct several “what-if” analyses. Using StreetSaver’s budget scenario module, the impacts of various budget "scenarios" may be evaluated. The program projects the effects of the different scenarios on pavement condition index (PCI), deferred maintenance (unfunded backlog), and average remaining service life of the network. By examining the effects on these performance measures, the advantages and disadvantages of different funding levels and maintenance strategies become clear.

Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget – This scenario assumes an unconstrained budget is available over 20 years. With a total $8.4 million, the overall PCI will be maintained at the high70s to low-80s, and the deferred maintenance will be eliminated by 2021.

Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 59 – This scenario aims to ensure that the overall pavement network PCI does not drop below 59 over the next 20 years. A total $6.4 million (approximately $0.32 million/year) is required, of which 9% will be allocated to preventive maintenance treatments. However, the deferred maintenance will increase to $5.8 million by 2034.

Scenario 3A: Improve PCI to 75 by 2024– This scenario aims to improve the overall PCI to 75 over 10 years. A total $4.9 million over 10 years is required to improve overall PCI to 75 by 2024, and approximately $0.4 million/year is needed to maintain the PCI at 75 over the subsequent 10 years. The deferred maintenance will slightly decrease to $1.4 million by 2034.

Scenario 3B: Improve PCI to 75 by 2034– This scenario aims to improve overall PCI to 75 over 20 years. With a total $8.7 million budget, the overall PCI will increase to 75 by 2034, and the deferred maintenance will slightly increase to $1.7 million.

Note: The term “deferred maintenance’ consists of pavement maintenance that is needed, but cannot be performed due to lack of funding. Shrinking budgets have forced many cities and counties to defer much needed pavement maintenance. By deferring maintenance, not only does the frequency of citizens' complaints about the condition of the network increase, but the cost to repair these streets rises as well. More detailed results of the budget needs and scenarios are included Appendix C.

Appendix D provides a list of candidate sections selected for treatments in all scenarios. Appendix E contacts maps generated from the GIS Toolbox in StreetSaver, which illustrate the results of each scenario. The maps show the entire pavement network, highlighting the color-coded condition category of each pavement section in 2034 for Scenarios 1 to 3.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
11 Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget ($8.4 Million)
This scenario assumes an unconstrained budget of $8.4 million is available over 20 years. Note that the budget requires $1.5 million in expenditures in the first year. The network PCI will increase to 82 by 2024 and remain between the high-70s to low-80s. Further, all the pavements will be in “Good” condition by 2034. The deferred maintenance will be eliminated by 2021.

Table 4: Summary Results for Scenario 1
Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Budget ($ M) 1.5 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 -- Def. Maintenance ($ M) 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -- PCI 71 70 72 71 76 79 80 80 81 82 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 22 22 24 23 25 27 27 28 28 29 --
Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Budget ($ M) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 8.4 Def. Maintenance ($ M) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -- PCI 81 80 80 79 79 79 80 79 79 78 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 28 28 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 26 --
Figure 7: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
12 Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 59 ($6.4 Million)
This scenario maintains the overall pavement network PCI at its current value of 59 over the next 20 years; a total of $6.4 million is needed. Approximately 75% of the network will be in “Good” condition, while one quarter of the network will be in “Very Poor” condition by 2034. The deferred maintenance will increase to $5.8 million. The projected remaining service life of the overall network is expected to be approximately 19 years by 2034.

Table 5: Summary Results for Scenario 2
Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Budget ($ M) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 -- Def. Maintenance ($ M) 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.6 4.0 -- PCI 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 17 17 17 18 17 17 17 18 18 18 --
Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Budget ($ M) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 6.4 Def. Maintenance ($ M) 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.8 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.8 -- PCI 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 18 18 18 19 19 18 19 19 19 19 --
Figure 8: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
13 Scenario 3: Improve PCI to 75 ($8.4 Million or $8.7 Million) Scenario 3A will improve the overall PCI to 75 over 10 years. A total $4.9 million over 10 years is required to improve PCI to 75 by 2024, and approximately $0.4 million per year is needed to maintain PCI at 75 over the subsequent 10 years. The deferred maintenance will slightly decrease to $1.4 million by 2034. The pavement in “Good” condition will increase to 94.5% with 5.5% pavement in “Very Poor” condition. The projected remaining service life of the overall network is expected to be approximately 25 years by 2034.

Alternatively, in Scenario 3B, the overall PCI will improve to 75 over 20 years. With a total of $8.7 million, the overall PCI will climb 1-2 points a year and improve to 75 by 2033, and the deferred maintenance will slightly increase to $1.7 million by 2034. The pavement in “Good” condition will increase to 92.7%, and 7.3% pavement will be in “Very Poor” condition category.

Table 6: Summary Results for Scenario 3A
Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Budget ($ M) 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 -- Def. Maintenance ($ M) 2.1 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.1 -- PCI 61 62 64 66 67 69 71 73 74 75 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 18 19 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 24 --
Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Budget ($ M) 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.3 8.4 Def. Maintenance ($ M) 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.4 -- PCI 75 75 76 75 75 75 75 75 76 75 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 --
Table 7: Summary Results for Scenario 3B
Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Budget ($ M) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 -- Def. Maintenance ($ M) 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 -- PCI 60 59 60 60 61 63 64 66 66 67 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 17 17 18 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 --
Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Budget ($ M) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 8.7 Def. Maintenance ($ M) 68 68 69 70 72 73 73 74 75 75 -- PCI 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.7 --
Remaining Service Life
(Years) 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 24 25 25 --
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
14 Figure 9: PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3 City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
15 Scenario Comparisons
The following two figures graphically illustrate the annual changes in PCI and deferred maintenance for Scenarios 1 to 3. Figure 10 below illustrates the changes in PCI over time for the different budget scenarios. Scenario 1 (Unconstrained Budget) will increase the PCI to 82 by 2024 and maintain at the high-70s to low-80s over 20 years. Scenario 2 will maintain the current PCI level at 59. Scenario 3A will increase the PCI to 75 by 2024 and maintain at that level over the next 10 years, while Scenario 3B will gradually increase the PCI to 75 by 2033.

Figure 10: Annual Pavement Condition Index by Scenarios Figure 11 on the next page illustrates the changes in deferred maintenance over time for the different budget scenarios. The most dramatic change is shown for Scenario 2, where the deferred maintenance more than triples to over $5.8 million. Scenario 3A essentially maintains the same deferred maintenance, and the deferred maintenance in Scenario 3B will slightly increase to $1.7 million by 2034.

Scenario 1 shows that the deferred maintenance will be eliminated by 2021.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
16 Figure 11: Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenarios
Figure 12 illustrates the pavement condition changes for the four scenarios. As noted earlier, 38.5% of the network is in the “Good/Very Good” condition category with 34.7% in “Poor” and 6.7% in “Very Poor/Failed” condition categories.

However, in Scenario 1, all the pavements will be in “Good/Very Good” condition by 2034. In Scenario 2,

74.7% of the pavements will be in “Good/Very Good” condition, and one quarter of pavement will be in “Very Poor” condition. For Scenaios 3A and 3B, pavements in the “Good/Very Good” condition will increase to 94.5% and 92.7%, respectively.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
17 Figure 12: Pavement Condition Changes for Scenarios 1 to 3 City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
18 Summary
To summarize, the City of Sutter Creek has a substantial investment of approximately $8.8 million in the pavement network. Overall, the pavement network is in “Fair” condition with a current network PCI of

59. Of the 14.86 centerline miles of City-maintained streets, over 58% of the streets currently fall into the “Fair” to “Good” condition categories.

The analyses indicate that the City needs to spend approximately $8.4 million in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation in order to essentially repair all streets. By doing so, streets then can be maintained in good condition with on-going preventive maintenance.

The most desirable scenario is to reduce the deferred maintenance to zero, but this is not possible for many reasons, and is unrealistic for most agencies. However, the goal should be to offer residents a safe and functional pavement network without unduly increasing the maintenance burden in the future.

Recommendations
A. Pavement Budget
The recommended scenario for the City of Sutter Creek is Scenario 3A (Improve PCI to 75 by 2024), with a funding level of $8.4 million over 20 years. This scenario will improve the current network PCI to 75 and maintain the deferred maintenance at the same level.

B. Pavement Maintenance Strategies
The City’s pavement maintenance strategies primarily include overlays. Since a large percentage of pavements are in “Fair” condition, it is important to preserve good pavements. Crack sealing is relatively inexpensive and can keep moisture out of pavements and prevent the underlying aggregate base from premature failures. Life-extending surface seals such as slurry seal and cape seals with microsurfacing, are also cost-effective for pavements currently in good condition.

NCE recommends that the City implement a well-funded preventive maintenance program. This is necessary to at least maintain the roughly half of the street network that is in “Good” and “Fair” condition and avoid escalating the deferred maintenance even more.

C. Re-inspection Strategies
In order to continue monitoring the street network, and to make appropriate decisions, it is recommended that the collector streets continue to be inspected every two years and residential streets every four to five years.

D. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Treatment Strategies
The maintenance and rehabilitation treatment strategies and associated unit costs should be reviewed and updated annually to reflect new construction techniques/costs so that the budget analysis results can continue to be reliable and accurate.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
19 A significant unknown fact is the future cost of rehabilitation; with the recent volatility in oil prices, we recommend that the City carefully monitor future construction costs and be ready to adapt to large increases if necessary. Figure 13 illustrates the changes in the Asphalt Price Index (source: Caltrans) since 1999. As can be seen, asphalt prices have been extremely volatile since 2007. Accurate pavement maintenance costs are essential for accurate results.

Figure 13: Asphalt Price Index (1999-2014, Caltrans)
E. Next Steps
To summarize, we recommend that the City undertake the following steps:
• Maintain an aggressive preventive maintenance strategy. • Pursue additional pavement funding sources to ensure that Scenario 3A is feasible.

APPENDIX A

Section Description Inventory Report

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
Appendix A
Section Description Inventory Report
This report lists a variety of section description information for each of the City’s pavement sections. It lists the road and section identifiers, limits, functional class, surface type, number of lanes, lengths, widths, last calculated PCI, and area identifier.

All of the City's pavement sections are included in the report. Two versions of the report are included.

One sorted alphabetically by Street Name and Section ID, and another by descending PCI. The field descriptions in this report are listed below:

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Street Name The name of the street as indicated by road signs in the field.

Street ID
Street Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the road. Generally, the street name is truncated to six characters. The Street ID should be unique for each road.

Section ID
Section Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the section number.

The combination of Section ID and Street ID must be unique.

Begin Location Beginning limit of the section.

End Location Ending limit of the section.

Length (FT) Length of the section in feet.

Width (FT) Average width of the section in feet.

Area (SQFT)
Estimated area of section, typically based on a direct product of the section length and width.

Surface Type (ST)
Surface Type (A = AC Pavement, O = AC Overlay of AC Pavement, AC/PCC = AC Overlay of PCC Pavement, GRAVEL = Gravel surface and base/subgrade, PCC = PCC Pavement, ST = Surface treatment over gravel base/subgrade).

Functional Class
(FC)
Functional Classification (RMaC = Rural Major Collector (5), RMiC = Rural Minor Collector (6), RL = Rural Local (7)).

PCI Date The date of the recent PCI survey.

PCI
The resulting value from the last calculated PCI for the section. The value may be calculated from either a visual survey or maintenance event.

Section Description Inventory Report:

Sorted by Street Name

City of Sutter Creek
PCI Listing
Sorted by Street Name
NCE 1/3 August 2015
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location Lanes FC Length (FT)
Width
(FT)
Area
(SQFT) ST PCI Date PCI
ACADDR 100 ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE DRIVE 2 RL 724 37 26,788 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 57 ALLERD 100 ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD 2 RL 316 14 4,424 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 35 AMADRD 100 AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT 2 RL 435 20 8,700 AC/PCC 4/8/2015 60 AMADTR 100 AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM SPANISH 2 RL 285 32 9,120 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 68 AMADTR 200 AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM SPANISH END 2 RL 275 12 3,300 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 29 AMAPDR 100 AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 662 36 23,832 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 96 AMELST 100 AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD STREET 2 RL 480 20 9,600 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 15 ANNAAV 100 ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE 2 RL 205 47 9,635 A 4/14/2015 76 ANNAAV 200 ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH AVE 2 RL 222 15 3,330 A 4/14/2015 72 BADGRD 100 BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH ROAD 2 RL 1,878 22 41,316 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 42 BADGRD 200 BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH ROAD MAIN STREET 2 RL 720 23 16,560 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 76 BARBCT 100 BARBARA CT JUDY DR END 2 RL 284 25 10,759 A 4/15/2015 55 BORGWY 100 BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY 2 RL 158 13 2,054 A 4/14/2015 30 BOSTAL 100 BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH STREET 2 RL 443 19 8,417 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 81 BOSTAL 200 BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH STREET GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 400 25 10,000 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 86 BOWEDR 100 BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RL 454 37 16,798 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 99 BOWEDR 200 BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT CHANGE VALLEY VIEW WAY 2 RL 991 37 36,667 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 39 BROAST 100 BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 677 40 27,080 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 100 BROADCT 100 BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END 2 RL 237 37 8,769 A 4/16/2015 82 BROAWY 800 BROADWAY BROAD STREET END 1 RL 649 13 8,437 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 46 BRYSCT 100 BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END 2 RL 327 18 5,886 A 4/15/2015 96 BRYSDR 100 BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL 2 RMiC 1,909 37 70,633 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 38 CALIDR 100 CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE ROAD END 2 RL 1,720 36 61,920 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 82 CHINGURD 100 CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END 2 RL 235 10 2,350 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 78 CHURST 500 CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY LIMIT/PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RMaC 2,159 25 53,975 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 55 COLEST 100 COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT ROAD PLAZA STREET 1 RL 847 15 12,705 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 54 COLUST 100 COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE ROAD RABB STREET 2 RL 545 20 10,900 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 16 CONNLN 100 CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END 2 RL 190 21 3,990 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 95 CREECT 100 CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST WEST END 2 RL 498 30 18,274 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 48 DAVIDR 100 DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END 2 RL 823 28 23,044 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 45 DELVIS 100 DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER TERRACE COMMUNITY 2 RL 150 22 3,300 AC/PCC 7/15/2015 100 DENNIS 100 DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON STREET 2 RL 2,743 16 43,888 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 44 ELCOCT 100 EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 105 36 3,780 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 97 ELM ST 100 ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON STREET 2 RL 410 18 7,380 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 31 EUREST 100 EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY 2 RL 2,004 11 22,044 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 34 EUREST 200 EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET 2 RL 401 18 7,218 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 59 EUREST 300 EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE 2 RL 317 20 6,340 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 62 FIFIEL 100 FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET 1 RL 309 13 4,017 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 38 FLUMRD 100 FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE TERRACE END 2 RL 85 12 1,020 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 25 FOOTDR 100 FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL DRIVE 2 RL 375 38 14,250 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 92 FOOTDR 200 FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEASANT DRIVE 2 RL 1,425 22 31,350 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 97 FRAKES 100 FRAKES GREENSTONE TERRACE 130 FRAKES 2 RL 325 15 4,875 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 79 GOLDTR 100 GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF PAVEMENT 30 GOLD DUST TRAIL 2 RL 263 14 3,682 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 73 GOLDTR 200 GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST TRAIL CHURCH STREET 2 RL 286 18 5,148 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 9 GOLDSCT 100 GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END 2 RL 737 34 27,457 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 62 City of Sutter Creek
PCI Listing
Sorted by Street Name
NCE 2/3 August 2015
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location Lanes FC Length (FT)
Width
(FT)
Area
(SQFT) ST PCI Date PCI
GOLDDR 100 GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT 2 RL 1,156 37 42,772 A 4/16/2015 82 GOPHRD 100 GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA 49 MILLS ST 2 RMaC 627 37 23,199 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 74 GOPHRD 200 GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT RD 2 RMaC 2,194 24 52,656 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 48 GOPHRD 300 GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT RD GOLDEN HILLS RD 2 RMaC 1,255 40 50,200 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 22 GREETR 100 GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL 49 FRAKE ST 2 RL 1,137 11 12,507 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 14 GREETR 200 GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET 2 RL 233 15 3,495 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 64 HAYDAL 100 HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD STREET 2 RL 532 18 9,576 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 30 HERRDR 100 HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END 2 RL 715 24 19,872 A 4/16/2015 98 HIGHGR 100 HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END 2 RL 650 10 6,500 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 10 HIGHDR 100 HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 NORTH RUBY ST 2 RL 493 28 13,804 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 74 HIGHDR 200 HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE 2 RL 1,318 28 36,904 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 86 JEANCT 100 JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END 2 RL 206 25 8,808 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 49 JUDYDR 100 JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN 2 RL 1,615 26 41,990 A 4/15/2015 52 KARSDR 100 KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END 2 RL 330 16 5,280 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 60 KEYEST 100 KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET 2 RL 295 16 4,720 AC/PCC 4/8/2015 57 LEIBAV 100 LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 337 12 4,044 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 64 LELACT 100 LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT 1 RL 146 15 2,190 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 18 LORIDR 100 LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR 2 RL 1,006 23 23,138 O 4/15/2015 87 MAHMRD 100 MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY MILL RD 2 RL 487 17 8,279 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 37 MAHMRD 200 MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY MILL RD MAHONEY RD 2 RL 581 12 6,972 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 74 MAHORD 100 MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END 2 RL 273 12 3,276 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 70 MANOCT 100 MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT ROAD END 2 RL 504 33 19,705 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 71 MARKLN 100 MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END 2 RL 447 28 12,516 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 47 MARRST 100 MARRE MILL STREET END 2 RL 457 18 8,226 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 8 MEADCR 100 MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 470 38 17,860 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 38 MILLST 100 MILL STREET (SUTTER CREEK) GOPHER FLAT ROAD BERNARDIS STREET 2 RL 630 33 20,790 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 72 MILLST 200 MILL STREET (SUTTER CREEK) BERNARDIS STREET PRIVATE GATE 2 RL 429 17 7,293 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 45 MINESCT 100 MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END 2 RL 127 12 1,524 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 81 MOUNDRS 100 MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE (SUTTER CRE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE 2 RL 280 25 7,000 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 97 NAMEST 100 N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD STREET 2 RL 412 39 16,068 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 37 NVIEST 100 N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 579 34 22,776 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 78 NICKST 100 NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET 2 RL 301 23 6,923 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 34 NICKST 200 NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH AVE 2 RL 391 23 8,993 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 73 NICKST 300 NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN 2 RL 130 23 2,990 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 50 OAKCT 100 OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END 2 RL 145 20 4,176 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 52 OAKVCT 100 OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 195 33 6,435 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 71 OLDSRD 100 OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD 2 RMiC 1,392 22 30,624 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 74 OLDSRD 200 OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET 2 RMiC 2,308 22 50,776 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 53 OPALST 100 OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END 2 RL 350 18 6,300 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 97 OROMWY 100 ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE WAY 2 RL 683 30 20,490 A 4/14/2015 15 OROMWY 200 ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE WAY MAHONEY MILL RD 2 RL 445 20 8,900 A 4/14/2015 25 PATRLN 100 PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA LANE 2 RL 535 36 19,260 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 54 PATRLN 200 PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 1,862 26 48,412 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 46 PEARST 100 PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE 2 RL 460 29 13,340 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 96 PLEADR 100 PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE 2 RL 252 20 5,040 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 86 City of Sutter Creek
PCI Listing
Sorted by Street Name
NCE 3/3 August 2015
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location Lanes FC Length (FT)
Width
(FT)
Area
(SQFT) ST PCI Date PCI
PLEADR 200 PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 1 RL 327 13 4,251 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 87 PROSDR 100 PROSPECT DRIVE RIDGE ROAD 30 PROSPECT DRIVE 2 RL 873 32 27,936 A 7/15/2015 100 PROSDR 200 PROSPECT DRIVE 30 PROSPECT DRIVE STERRA WEST CT 2 RL 620 32 19,840 A 7/15/2015 88 RABBST 100 RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END 2 RL 855 22 18,810 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 43 RANDST 100 RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST 2 RL 501 18 9,018 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 44 RANDST 200 RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY 2 RL 194 22 4,268 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 18 RANDST 300 RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET 2 RL 101 22 2,222 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 65 RAYLDR 100 RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 996 36 35,856 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 41 RIDGRD 100 RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE SECTION E.CITY LIMITS 2 RMaC 426 38 16,188 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 61 RIDGCT 100 RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 1,142 34 41,815 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 81 RUBYST 100 RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE 2 RL 460 21 9,660 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 97 SIERCT 100 SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 176 37 9,042 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 81 SILKLN 100 SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 245 25 8,857 A 4/16/2015 98 SPANST 100 SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET 2 RL 270 20 5,400 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 34 SPANST 200 SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET 2 RL 300 22 6,600 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 44 SPANST 300 SPANISH STREET HAYDEN STREET BADGER STREET 2 RL 1,240 30 37,200 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 36 SPANST 400 SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH SCHOOL 2 RL 1,145 22 25,190 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 71 SPANST 500 SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH SCHOOL SUTTER - JONE ROAD 3 RL 230 35 8,050 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 84 SPANST 600 SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE ROAD HANFORD STREET 4 RMaC 260 50 13,000 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 83 STANFO 100 STANFORD MillSTREET END 1 RL 231 13 3,003 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 38 SUTTRD 100 SUTTER CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET 2 RMaC 1,010 30 30,300 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 90 SUTTRD 200 SUTTER SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE ROAD 1 RMaC 100 16 1,600 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 99 SUTTCE 100 SUTTER CREST EAST SUTTER CREST WEST PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RL 1,220 37 45,140 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 56 SUTTCE 200 SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT CHANGE GOLDEN HILLS DR 2 RL 785 37 29,045 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 98 SUTTCW 100 SUTTER CREST WEST MEADOW CREST END 2 RL 1,770 37 65,490 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 48 SUTTCT 100 SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 226 33 10,532 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 68 TUCKRD 100 TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 2 RL 218 12 2,616 ST 4/10/2015 76 TUCKRD 200 TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY 1 RL 596 9 5,364 ST 4/10/2015 76 TUCKRD 300 TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 135 22 2,970 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 54 URSUDR 100 URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 472 36 16,992 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 90 VALLWY 100 VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RL 1,067 38 40,546 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 54 VALLWY 200 VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT CHANGE HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 427 38 16,226 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 97 VISTCT 100 VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END 2 RL 161 37 6,400 O 5/15/2015 78 WERNRD 100 WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT ROAD GATE 2 RL 120 25 3,000 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 29 WOODWO 100 WOODWORTH NICKERSON STREET END 2 RL 273 18 4,914 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 45 WORLEY 100 WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET 2 RL 277 13 3,601 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 44

Section Description Inventory Report:

Sorted by Descending PCI

City of Sutter Creek
PCI Listing
Sorted by Descending PCI
NCE 1/3 August 2015
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location Lanes FC Length (FT)
Width
(FT)
Area
(SQFT) ST PCI Date PCI
BROAST 100 BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 677 40 27,080 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 100 DELVIS 100 DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER TERRACE COMMUNITY 2 RL 150 22 3,300 AC/PCC 7/15/2015 100 PROSDR 100 PROSPECT DRIVE RIDGE ROAD 30 PROSPECT DRIVE 2 RL 873 32 27,936 A 7/15/2015 100 BOWEDR 100 BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RL 454 37 16,798 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 99 SUTTRD 200 SUTTER SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE ROAD 1 RMaC 100 16 1,600 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 99 HERRDR 100 HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END 2 RL 715 24 19,872 A 4/16/2015 98 SILKLN 100 SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 245 25 8,857 A 4/16/2015 98 SUTTCE 200 SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT CHANGE GOLDEN HILLS DR 2 RL 785 37 29,045 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 98 ELCOCT 100 EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 105 36 3,780 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 97 FOOTDR 200 FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEASANT DRIVE 2 RL 1,425 22 31,350 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 97 MOUNDRS 100 MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE (SUTTER CRE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE 2 RL 280 25 7,000 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 97 OPALST 100 OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END 2 RL 350 18 6,300 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 97 RUBYST 100 RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE 2 RL 460 21 9,660 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 97 VALLWY 200 VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT CHANGE HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 427 38 16,226 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 97 AMAPDR 100 AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 662 36 23,832 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 96 BRYSCT 100 BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END 2 RL 327 18 5,886 A 4/15/2015 96 PEARST 100 PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE 2 RL 460 29 13,340 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 96 CONNLN 100 CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END 2 RL 190 21 3,990 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 95 FOOTDR 100 FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL DRIVE 2 RL 375 38 14,250 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 92 SUTTRD 100 SUTTER CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET 2 RMaC 1,010 30 30,300 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 90 URSUDR 100 URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 472 36 16,992 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 90 PROSDR 200 PROSPECT DRIVE 30 PROSPECT DRIVE STERRA WEST CT 2 RL 620 32 19,840 A 7/15/2015 88 LORIDR 100 LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR 2 RL 1,006 23 23,138 O 4/15/2015 87 PLEADR 200 PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 1 RL 327 13 4,251 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 87 BOSTAL 200 BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH STREET GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 400 25 10,000 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 86 HIGHDR 200 HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE 2 RL 1,318 28 36,904 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 86 PLEADR 100 PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE 2 RL 252 20 5,040 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 86 SPANST 500 SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH SCHOOL SUTTER - JONE ROAD 3 RL 230 35 8,050 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 84 SPANST 600 SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE ROAD HANFORD STREET 4 RMaC 260 50 13,000 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 83 BROADCT 100 BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END 2 RL 237 37 8,769 A 4/16/2015 82 CALIDR 100 CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE ROAD END 2 RL 1,720 36 61,920 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 82 GOLDDR 100 GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT 2 RL 1,156 37 42,772 A 4/16/2015 82 BOSTAL 100 BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH STREET 2 RL 443 19 8,417 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 81 MINESCT 100 MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END 2 RL 127 12 1,524 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 81 RIDGCT 100 RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 1,142 34 41,815 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 81 SIERCT 100 SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END 2 RL 176 37 9,042 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 81 FRAKES 100 FRAKES GREENSTONE TERRACE 130 FRAKES 2 RL 325 15 4,875 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 79 CHINGURD 100 CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END 2 RL 235 10 2,350 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 78 NVIEST 100 N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 579 34 22,776 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 78 VISTCT 100 VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END 2 RL 161 37 6,400 O 5/15/2015 78 ANNAAV 100 ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE 2 RL 205 47 9,635 A 4/14/2015 76 BADGRD 200 BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH ROAD MAIN STREET 2 RL 720 23 16,560 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 76 TUCKRD 100 TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 2 RL 218 12 2,616 ST 4/10/2015 76 TUCKRD 200 TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY 1 RL 596 9 5,364 ST 4/10/2015 76 GOPHRD 100 GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA 49 MILLS ST 2 RMaC 627 37 23,199 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 74 City of Sutter Creek
PCI Listing
Sorted by Descending PCI
NCE 2/3 August 2015
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location Lanes FC Length (FT)
Width
(FT)
Area
(SQFT) ST PCI Date PCI
HIGHDR 100 HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 NORTH RUBY ST 2 RL 493 28 13,804 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 74 MAHMRD 200 MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY MILL RD MAHONEY RD 2 RL 581 12 6,972 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 74 OLDSRD 100 OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD 2 RMiC 1,392 22 30,624 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 74 GOLDTR 100 GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF PAVEMENT 30 GOLD DUST TRAIL 2 RL 263 14 3,682 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 73 NICKST 200 NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH AVE 2 RL 391 23 8,993 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 73 ANNAAV 200 ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH AVE 2 RL 222 15 3,330 A 4/14/2015 72 MILLST 100 MILL STREET (SUTTER CREEK) GOPHER FLAT ROAD BERNARDIS STREET 2 RL 630 33 20,790 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 72 MANOCT 100 MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT ROAD END 2 RL 504 33 19,705 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 71 OAKVCT 100 OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 195 33 6,435 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 71 SPANST 400 SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH SCHOOL 2 RL 1,145 22 25,190 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 71 MAHORD 100 MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END 2 RL 273 12 3,276 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 70 AMADTR 100 AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM SPANISH 2 RL 285 32 9,120 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 68 SUTTCT 100 SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST EAST END 2 RL 226 33 10,532 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 68 RANDST 300 RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET 2 RL 101 22 2,222 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 65 GREETR 200 GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET 2 RL 233 15 3,495 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 64 LEIBAV 100 LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 337 12 4,044 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 64 EUREST 300 EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE 2 RL 317 20 6,340 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 62 GOLDSCT 100 GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END 2 RL 737 34 27,457 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 62 RIDGRD 100 RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE SECTION E.CITY LIMITS 2 RMaC 426 38 16,188 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 61 AMADRD 100 AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT 2 RL 435 20 8,700 AC/PCC 4/8/2015 60 KARSDR 100 KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END 2 RL 330 16 5,280 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 60 EUREST 200 EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET 2 RL 401 18 7,218 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 59 ACADDR 100 ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE DRIVE 2 RL 724 37 26,788 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 57 KEYEST 100 KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET 2 RL 295 16 4,720 AC/PCC 4/8/2015 57 SUTTCE 100 SUTTER CREST EAST SUTTER CREST WEST PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RL 1,220 37 45,140 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 56 BARBCT 100 BARBARA CT JUDY DR END 2 RL 284 25 10,759 A 4/15/2015 55 CHURST 500 CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY LIMIT/PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RMaC 2,159 25 53,975 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 55 COLEST 100 COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT ROAD PLAZA STREET 1 RL 847 15 12,705 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 54 PATRLN 100 PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA LANE 2 RL 535 36 19,260 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 54 TUCKRD 300 TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 135 22 2,970 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 54 VALLWY 100 VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT CHANGE 2 RL 1,067 38 40,546 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 54 OLDSRD 200 OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET 2 RMiC 2,308 22 50,776 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 53 JUDYDR 100 JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN 2 RL 1,615 26 41,990 A 4/15/2015 52 OAKCT 100 OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END 2 RL 145 20 4,176 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 52 NICKST 300 NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN 2 RL 130 23 2,990 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 50 JEANCT 100 JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END 2 RL 206 25 8,808 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 49 CREECT 100 CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST WEST END 2 RL 498 30 18,274 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 48 GOPHRD 200 GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT RD 2 RMaC 2,194 24 52,656 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 48 SUTTCW 100 SUTTER CREST WEST MEADOW CREST END 2 RL 1,770 37 65,490 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 48 MARKLN 100 MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END 2 RL 447 28 12,516 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 47 BROAWY 800 BROADWAY BROAD STREET END 1 RL 649 13 8,437 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 46 PATRLN 200 PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 1,862 26 48,412 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 46 DAVIDR 100 DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END 2 RL 823 28 23,044 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 45 MILLST 200 MILL STREET (SUTTER CREEK) BERNARDIS STREET PRIVATE GATE 2 RL 429 17 7,293 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 45 WOODWO 100 WOODWORTH NICKERSON STREET END 2 RL 273 18 4,914 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 45 City of Sutter Creek
PCI Listing
Sorted by Descending PCI
NCE 3/3 August 2015
Street ID Section ID Street Name Beg Location End Location Lanes FC Length (FT)
Width
(FT)
Area
(SQFT) ST PCI Date PCI
DENNIS 100 DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON STREET 2 RL 2,743 16 43,888 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 44 RANDST 100 RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST 2 RL 501 18 9,018 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 44 SPANST 200 SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET 2 RL 300 22 6,600 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 44 WORLEY 100 WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET 2 RL 277 13 3,601 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 44 RABBST 100 RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END 2 RL 855 22 18,810 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 43 BADGRD 100 BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH ROAD 2 RL 1,878 22 41,316 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 42 RAYLDR 100 RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 2 RL 996 36 35,856 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 41 BOWEDR 200 BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT CHANGE VALLEY VIEW WAY 2 RL 991 37 36,667 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 39 BRYSDR 100 BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL 2 RMiC 1,909 37 70,633 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 38 FIFIEL 100 FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET 1 RL 309 13 4,017 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 38 MEADCR 100 MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT ROAD 2 RL 470 38 17,860 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 38 STANFO 100 STANFORD MillSTREET END 1 RL 231 13 3,003 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 38 MAHMRD 100 MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY MILL RD 2 RL 487 17 8,279 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 37 NAMEST 100 N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD STREET 2 RL 412 39 16,068 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 37 SPANST 300 SPANISH STREET HAYDEN STREET BADGER STREET 2 RL 1,240 30 37,200 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 36 ALLERD 100 ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD 2 RL 316 14 4,424 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 35 EUREST 100 EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY 2 RL 2,004 11 22,044 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 34 NICKST 100 NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET 2 RL 301 23 6,923 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 34 SPANST 100 SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET 2 RL 270 20 5,400 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 34 ELM ST 100 ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON STREET 2 RL 410 18 7,380 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 31 BORGWY 100 BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY 2 RL 158 13 2,054 A 4/14/2015 30 HAYDAL 100 HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD STREET 2 RL 532 18 9,576 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 30 AMADTR 200 AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM SPANISH END 2 RL 275 12 3,300 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 29 WERNRD 100 WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT ROAD GATE 2 RL 120 25 3,000 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 29 FLUMRD 100 FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE TERRACE END 2 RL 85 12 1,020 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 25 OROMWY 200 ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE WAY MAHONEY MILL RD 2 RL 445 20 8,900 A 4/14/2015 25 GOPHRD 300 GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT RD GOLDEN HILLS RD 2 RMaC 1,255 40 50,200 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 22 LELACT 100 LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT 1 RL 146 15 2,190 AC/PCC 4/16/2015 18 RANDST 200 RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY 2 RL 194 22 4,268 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 18 COLUST 100 COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE ROAD RABB STREET 2 RL 545 20 10,900 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 16 AMELST 100 AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD STREET 2 RL 480 20 9,600 AC/PCC 4/9/2015 15 OROMWY 100 ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE WAY 2 RL 683 30 20,490 A 4/14/2015 15 GREETR 100 GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL 49 FRAKE ST 2 RL 1,137 11 12,507 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 14 HIGHGR 100 HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END 2 RL 650 10 6,500 AC/PCC 4/14/2015 10 GOLDTR 200 GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST TRAIL CHURCH STREET 2 RL 286 18 5,148 AC/PCC 4/15/2015 9 MARRST 100 MARRE MILL STREET END 2 RL 457 18 8,226 AC/PCC 4/10/2015 8

APPENDIX B

Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
Appendix B
Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree
This report presents the current maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree that exists in the database. The decision tree forms the basis for all of the budgetary computations that are included in this volume. Changes to the decision tree will make the results in the budget reports invalid. All pavement treatment unit costs relevant to the road types in the database were updated by the City.

The decision tree lists the treatments and costs selected for preventive maintenance and rehabilitation activities. Each line represents a specific combination of functional classification and surface type.

The preventive maintenance portion of the report is identified as Condition Category I. All preventive maintenance treatment listings are assigned only to sections in Condition Category I where the PCI ≥ 70.

Sections with PCI values less than 70 are assigned to treatments listed in Categories II through V.

In the preventive maintenance category (PCI  70), a time sequence is used to identify the appropriate treatment and cost. Each preventive maintenance treatment description consists of three parts: 1) a CRACK treatment, 2) a SURFACE treatment, and 3) a RESTORATION treatment. These three parts allow the user to specify one of three different preventive maintenance treatments depending on the prior maintenance history of the section.

1. The CRACK treatment part can be used to specify the most frequent type of preventive maintenance activity planned (typically crack seals).

2. The SURFACE treatment part can be used to specify more extensive and less frequent preventive maintenance activities, such as chip seals or slurry seals. For example, a crack seal can be specified on a three-year cycle with a slurry seal specified after five years.

3. The RESTORATION part can be used to specify a surface restoration treatment (such as an overlay) to be performed after a specified number of surface treatments. For example, after a certain number of successive slurry seals, an overlay can be specified instead of another slurry seal.

Rehabilitation treatments are assigned to sections in Condition Categories II through V (PCI less than 70).

Each line is defined by a specific combination of functional classification, surface type, and condition category.

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
Appendix B

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Functional Class Functional Classification identifying the branch number.

Surface Surface Type identifying the branch number.

Condition Category Condition Category (I through V).

Treatment Type
First Row (Crack Treatment) indicates localized treatment (e.g. crack sealing).

Second Row (Surface Treatment) indicates surface treatment (e.g. slurry sealing).

Third Row (Restoration Treatment) indicates surface restoration (e.g. overlay).

Treatment Name of treatments from the "Treatment Descriptions" report.

Yrs. Between Crack
Seals
First Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the first row (i.e. CRACK treatment).

Yrs. Between
Surface Seals
Second Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the second row (i.e. SURFACE treatment).

Number of
Sequential Seals
before Overlay
Number of times that the treatment application in the second row (i.e. SURFACE treatment) will be performed prior to performing the treatment application in the third row.

Note that the treatments assigned to each section should not be blindly followed in preparing a road maintenance program. Engineering judgment and project level analysis should be applied to ensure that the treatment is appropriate and cost effective for the section.

Arterial AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.00 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.50
III - Good, Load Related 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS $13.00 IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.50
V - Very Poor 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY $31.00
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.00 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.50
III - Good, Load Related 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS $13.00 IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.50
V - Very Poor 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY $31.00
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.00 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.50
III - Good, Load Related 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS $13.00 IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.50
V - Very Poor 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY $31.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Arterial PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.50
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $83.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.11
III - Good, Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.51
IV - Poor SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES) $7.67
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
Collector AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.00 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS $12.00 IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.00
V - Very Poor 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY $30.00
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.00 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS $12.00 IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.00
V - Very Poor 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY $30.00
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.00 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS $12.00 IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.00
V - Very Poor 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY $30.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver
Collector PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $83.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.00 3
Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS $12.00 IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$22.00
V - Very Poor 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY $30.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 4 MTC StreetSaver
Residential/Local AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
IV - Poor CHIP SEAL WITH 15% DIGOUTS $15.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB) $40.00
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
IV - Poor CHIP SEAL WITH 15% DIGOUTS $15.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB) $40.00
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
IV - Poor CHIP SEAL WITH 15% DIGOUTS $15.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB) $40.00
PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor 1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
$20.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $51.50
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 5 MTC StreetSaver
Residential/Local ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL $2.50 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
III - Good, Load Related CHIP OR CAPE SEAL $6.00
IV - Poor CHIP SEAL WITH 15% DIGOUTS $15.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB) $40.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 6 MTC StreetSaver
Other AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.60 4 Surface Treatment SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.74 8
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THIN OVERLAY $5.04 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.11
III - Good, Load Related THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES) $3.99 IV - Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES) $5.97
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $8.75
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.60 4 Surface Treatment SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.74 8
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THIN OVERLAY $5.04 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DOUBLE CHIP SEAL $1.52
III - Good, Load Related HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $5.95 IV - Poor HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $6.14
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $8.75
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $1.60 4 Surface Treatment SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.74 8
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THIN OVERLAY $5.04 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DOUBLE CHIP SEAL $1.52
III - Good, Load Related HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $5.95 IV - Poor HEATER SCARIFY & OVERLAY $6.14
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $8.75
PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $1.11
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $1.51
IV - Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES) $1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES) $7.27
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 7 MTC StreetSaver
Other ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II - Good, Non-Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.11
III - Good, Load Related SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.51
IV - Poor SINGLE CHIP SEAL $1.92
V - Very Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES) $7.27
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional Class
Amador Multi-City
Printed: 07/22/2015
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 8 MTC StreetSaver

APPENDIX C

Budget Needs
Projected PCI / Cost Summary Report
Preventive Maintenance Treatment / Cost Summary Report
Rehabilitation Treatment / Cost Summary Report

City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
Appendix C
Budget Needs Reports
The purpose of this module is to answer the question: If the City had all the money in the world, what sections should be fixed and how much will it cost? Based on the Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree and the PCIs of the sections, the program will then select a maintenance or rehabilitation action and compute the total costs over the entire analysis period. The Budget Needs represents the "ideal world" funding levels, while the Budget Scenarios reports in the next section represent the most "cost effective" prioritization possible for the actual funding levels.

A budget needs analysis has been performed. The summary results from the analysis are shown below.

An interest rate of 5.0% and an inflation factor of 5.0% were used to project the costs for analysis period. This report shows the total budget that would be required to meet the City’s standards as exemplified in the M&R Decision Tree.

Budget Needs reports included in this volume are listed below, and Needs for entire network are separated:
 Projected PCI/Cost Summary
 Preventative Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
 Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
Appendix C
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary
This report summarizes and projects the City’s network PCI values over the analysis period, both with and without treatments applied. These costs are based on those in the Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree. It also projects the costs over the same analysis period.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Year Year in the analysis period.

PCI Treated Projected network average PCI with all needed treatments applied.

PCI Untreated Projected network average PCI without any treatments applied.

PM Cost Total preventive maintenance treatment cost.

Rehab Cost Total rehabilitation treatment cost.

Cost
The budget required for each year in the analysis period to meet the City’s standard as shown on the M&R Decision Tree.
2015 71 59 $100,555 $1,359,628 $1,460,183
2016 70 57 $0 $316,274 $316,274
2017 72 55 $38,132 $592,683 $630,815
2018 71 52 $43,213 $94,279 $137,492
2019 76 50 $153 $906,028 $906,181
2020 79 48 $9,959 $893,007 $902,966
2021 80 46 $383 $698,143 $698,526
2022 80 44 $63,634 $329,421 $393,055
2023 81 42 $190,535 $152,501 $343,036
2024 82 39 $69,265 $227,196 $296,461
2025 81 37 $67,889 $99,140 $167,029
2026 80 35 $97,365 $13,862 $111,227
2027 80 33 $39,598 $112,279 $151,877
2028 79 31 $65,951 $57,308 $123,259
2029 79 29 $110,072 $228,480 $338,552
2030 79 27 $41,512 $351,647 $393,159
2031 80 26 $295,866 $69,987 $365,853
2032 79 24 $34,145 $95,304 $129,449
2033 79 23 $146,988 $66,269 $213,257
2034 78 22 $94,847 $219,136 $313,983
Total Cost
$8,392,634
PM Total Cost
$1,510,062
% PM

17.99% $6,882,572
Rehab Total Cost
Year PCI Treated PCI Untreated Cost
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Inflation Rate = % 5.00
PM Cost Rehab Cost
Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1
SS1008
MTC StreetSaver
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
Appendix C
Needs - Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each preventive maintenance treatment type, quantity of pavement affected, and total costs over the analysis period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the same analysis period.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of preventive maintenance treatments needed.

Year Year in the analysis period.

Area Treated Quantities in linear feet (i.e. Seal Cracks) or square yard (i.e. Slurry Seal).

Cost Maintenance treatment cost.

SEAL CRACKS 2018 121.28 ft. $143
2019 124.62 ft. $153
2020 279.41 ft. $358
2021 284.13 ft. $383
2022 124.6 ft. $176
2023 487.22 ft. $723
2025 339.21 ft. $556
2026 100.93 ft. $173
2027 321.58 ft. $579
2028 504.4 ft. $953
2029 311.05 ft. $616
2030 402.74 ft. $839
2032 637.77 ft. $1,464
2033 121.37 ft. $293
2034 328.95 ft. $833
Total 4,489.28 $8,242
SURFACE SEAL 2015 40,218.22 sq.yd. $100,555
2017 13,833.22 sq.yd. $38,132
2018 14,881 sq.yd. $43,070
2020 3,008.89 sq.yd. $9,601
2022 18,038.22 sq.yd. $63,458
2023 51,385 sq.yd. $189,812
2024 17,858.67 sq.yd. $69,265
2025 16,532.78 sq.yd. $67,333
2026 22,729.11 sq.yd. $97,192
2027 8,690.33 sq.yd. $39,019
2028 13,787 sq.yd. $64,998
2029 22,112.33 sq.yd. $109,456
2030 7,825.33 sq.yd. $40,673
2031 54,213.33 sq.yd. $295,866
2032 5,703.33 sq.yd. $32,681
2033 24,380.89 sq.yd. $146,695
2034 14,881 sq.yd. $94,014
Total 350,078.67 $1,501,820
Treatment
Inflation Rate = % 5.00
Year Area Treated Cost
Amador Multi-City Needs - Preventive Maintenance
Treatment/Cost Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1
SS1007
MTC StreetSaver
Total Quantity 354,567.95 $1,510,062
City of Sutter Creek
2015 Pavement Management Program Update
Appendix C
Needs - Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each rehabilitation treatment type, quantity of pavement affected, and total costs over the analysis period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the same analysis period.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of rehabilitation treatments needed.

Year Year in the analysis period.

Area Treated Quantities in square yard.

Cost Rehabilitation treatment cost.

1.5" AC OVERLAY W/FABRIC AND 10% DIGOUTS 2015 5,850.67 sq.yd. $128,715 2016 5,641.78 sq.yd. $130,326
2017 5,997.22 sq.yd. $145,463
Total 17,489.67 sq.yd. $404,504
5% LOCALIZED REPAIR WITH INLAYS 2015 1,798.67 sq.yd. $21,584 Total 1,798.67 sq.yd. $21,584
6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC OVERLAY 2015 5,577.78 sq.yd. $167,334 2019 7,848.11 sq.yd. $286,183
Total 13,425.89 sq.yd. $453,517
CHIP OR CAPE SEAL 2015 7,387.33 sq.yd. $44,326
2016 16,691.33 sq.yd. $105,157
2017 27,890.56 sq.yd. $184,501
2018 10,584.33 sq.yd. $73,520
2019 7,409.56 sq.yd. $54,042
2020 18,098.67 sq.yd. $138,599
2021 10,664.67 sq.yd. $85,751
2022 35,541.22 sq.yd. $300,068
2023 17,202.67 sq.yd. $152,501
2024 24,408.22 sq.yd. $227,196
2025 10,143.67 sq.yd. $99,140
2026 1,350.67 sq.yd. $13,862
2027 10,419.89 sq.yd. $112,279
2028 5,065.11 sq.yd. $57,308
2029 19,232.56 sq.yd. $228,480
2030 28,190.89 sq.yd. $351,647
2031 5,343.56 sq.yd. $69,987
2032 6,930 sq.yd. $95,304
2033 4,589.22 sq.yd. $66,269
2034 14,452.89 sq.yd. $219,136
Total 281,597 sq.yd. $2,679,073
CHIP SEAL WITH 15% DIGOUTS 2015 39,918.56 sq.yd. $598,781 2016 5,129.56 sq.yd. $80,791
2017 8,386.78 sq.yd. $138,699
2018 1,195.44 sq.yd. $20,759
2019 8,516.44 sq.yd. $155,278
2020 10,664.67 sq.yd. $204,168
2021 19,600.56 sq.yd. $394,004
2022 1,390.67 sq.yd. $29,353
Total 94,802.67 sq.yd. $1,621,833
RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB) 2015 9,972.11 sq.yd. $398,888 2017 2,812.22 sq.yd. $124,020
2019 8,443.44 sq.yd. $410,525
2020 10,778.11 sq.yd. $550,240
2021 4,074.11 sq.yd. $218,388
Treatment Year Area Treated Cost
Needs - Rehabilitation
Treatment/Cost Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Inflation Rate = % 5.00
Total 36,080 sq.yd. $1,702,061
Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1
SS1010
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Year Area Treated Cost
Needs - Rehabilitation
Treatment/Cost Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Inflation Rate = % 5.00
Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2
SS1010
MTC StreetSaver
Total Cost $6,882,572
Scenarios 1 - 3

Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget ($8.4 Million)
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
2015 $2,000,000
$1,359,628
$42,142
$23,768
$727,496
$566,222
$100,555 $0 $787,612 $11,630
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2016 $2,000,000
$316,274
$44,429
$60,728
$211,117
$0
$0 $96,000 $943,727 $4,000
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2017 $2,000,000
$592,683
$92,070
$92,431
$284,162
$124,020
$38,132 $61,868 $849,256 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2018 $2,000,000
$94,279
$37,627
$35,893
$20,759
$0
$43,213 $56,787 $883,415 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2019 $2,000,000
$906,028
$11,296
$42,746
$155,278
$696,708
$153 $99,847 $501,662 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2020 $2,000,000
$893,007
$31,216
$107,383
$204,168
$550,240
$9,959 $88,610 $238,740 $1,431
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2021 $2,000,000
$698,143
$85,751
$0
$394,004
$218,388
$383 $99,375 $11,182 $242
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2022 $2,000,000
$329,421
$150,089
$149,979
$29,353
$0
$63,634 $36,366 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2023 $2,000,000
$152,501
$136,626
$15,875
$0
$0
$190,535 $0 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $2,000,000
$227,196
$47,303
$179,893
$0
$0
$69,265 $30,735 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $2,000,000
$99,140
$36,702
$62,438
$0
$0
$67,889 $32,111 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $2,000,000
$13,862
$4,762
$9,100
$0
$0
$97,365 $2,635 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $2,000,000
$112,279
$47,297
$64,982
$0
$0
$39,598 $60,402 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2028 $2,000,000
$57,308
$57,308
$0
$0
$0
$65,951 $34,049 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $2,000,000
$228,480
$164,143
$64,337
$0
$0
$110,072 $0 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2030 $2,000,000
$351,647
$52,724
$298,923
$0
$0
$41,512 $58,488 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2031 $2,000,000
$69,987
$47,421
$22,566
$0
$0
$295,866 $0 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2032 $2,000,000
$95,304
$31,142
$64,162
$0
$0
$34,145 $65,855 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2033 $2,000,000
$66,269
$66,269
$0
$0
$0
$146,988 $0 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2034 $2,000,000
$219,136
$114,256
$104,880
$0
$0
$94,847 $5,153 $0 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 3 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Collector $919,166 $417,927 $3,083 $0
Residential/Local $5,963,406 $1,092,135 $14,220 $0
Grand Total: $6,882,572 $1,510,062 $17,303 $0
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 4 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $2,000,000 5% 2016 $2,000,000 5% 2017 $2,000,000 5% 2018 $2,000,000 5% 2019 $2,000,000 5% 2020 $2,000,000 5% 2021 $2,000,000 5% 2022 $2,000,000 5% 2023 $2,000,000 5% 2024 $2,000,000 5% 2025 $2,000,000 5% 2026 $2,000,000 5% 2027 $2,000,000 5% 2028 $2,000,000 5% 2029 $2,000,000 5% 2030 $2,000,000 5% 2031 $2,000,000 5% 2032 $2,000,000 5% 2033 $2,000,000 5% 2034 $2,000,000 5%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Never Treated
Treated with
Year Scenario Criteria
Treated
Centerline Miles
Treated
Lane Miles
2015 59 71 7.21 14.34
2016 57 70 1.65 3.31
2017 55 72 3.61 7.05
2018 52 71 2.39 4.60
2019 50 76 2.76 5.51
2020 48 79 3.26 6.23
2021 46 80 3.34 6.65
2022 44 80 4.11 8.08
2023 42 81 6.12 12.18
2024 39 82 2.71 5.27
2025 37 81 2.69 5.49
2026 35 80 1.87 3.63
2027 33 80 2.26 4.35
2028 31 79 2.01 4.01
2029 29 79 3.49 7.08
2030 27 79 3.20 6.14
2031 26 80 3.92 7.78
2032 24 79 2.17 4.43
2033 23 79 2.17 4.35
2034 22 78 2.59 4.88
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2015, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 4.8% 33.7% 0.0% 38.5%
II / III 0.0% 5.8% 14.3% 0.0% 20.2%
IV 0.0% 5.9% 28.7% 0.0% 34.6%
V 0.0% 2.4% 4.3% 0.0% 6.8%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2015 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 MTC StreetSaver SS1035
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 10.5% 41.2% 0.0% 51.8%
II / III 0.0% 5.1% 28.4% 0.0% 33.5%
IV 0.0% 3.4% 11.3% 0.0% 14.7%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2034 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 MTC StreetSaver SS1035
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 59 ($6.4 Million)
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
2015 $60,000
$52,139
$23,837
$23,768
$0
$4,534
$0 $0 $2,195,640 $7,863
$25,358
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2016 $200,000
$188,867
$38,263
$0
$140,384
$10,220
$11,101 $0 $2,286,975 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2017 $250,000
$234,094
$68,819
$2,198
$136,842
$26,235
$15,883 $0 $2,527,016 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2018 $300,000
$282,111
$6,159
$2,308
$152,736
$120,908
$17,756 $0 $2,417,510 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2019 $220,000
$205,518
$13,099
$0
$9,562
$182,857
$14,246 $0 $2,755,718 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2020 $250,000
$234,617
$4,017
$0
$0
$230,600
$0 $0 $3,016,754 $15,385
$34,503
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2021 $300,000
$284,769
$0
$0
$11,793
$272,976
$14,430 $570 $3,033,484 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2022 $300,000
$268,957
$30,941
$7,486
$0
$230,530
$30,937 $0 $3,231,992 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2023 $300,000
$275,132
$115,605
$0
$0
$159,527
$23,798 $0 $3,572,770 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $350,000
$316,255
$77,711
$21,488
$0
$217,056
$33,257 $0 $3,951,043 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $400,000
$362,039
$6,885
$3,247
$0
$351,907
$0 $0 $4,286,009 $37,962
$40,049
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $400,000
$366,256
$23,706
$9,100
$0
$333,450
$33,717 $0 $4,412,458 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $380,000
$356,894
$44,947
$0
$0
$311,947
$22,795 $0 $4,331,814 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2028 $380,000
$359,833
$77,026
$0
$0
$282,807
$19,990 $0 $4,320,819 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $320,000
$290,504
$99,347
$0
$0
$191,157
$28,338 $0 $4,771,714 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2030 $350,000
$323,698
$116,741
$39,856
$0
$167,101
$0 $0 $5,156,440 $26,307
$70,027
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2031 $430,000
$362,459
$362,459
$0
$0
$0
$67,294 $0 $5,442,552 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2032 $430,000
$357,191
$23,349
$60,959
$0
$272,883
$71,771 $0 $5,445,181 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2033 $430,000
$281,887
$73,920
$37,706
$0
$170,261
$146,402 $0 $5,512,003 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2034 $400,000
$330,395
$86,829
$13,445
$0
$230,121
$68,960 $0 $5,760,806 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 3 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Collector $833,431 $239,755 $34,766 $4,348
Residential/Local $4,900,184 $380,920 $52,752 $165,589
Grand Total: $5,733,615 $620,675 $87,518 $169,937
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 4 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $60,000 5% 2016 $200,000 5% 2017 $250,000 5%
2018 $300,000 5% 2019 $220,000 5% 2020 $250,000 5%
2021 $300,000 5% 2022 $300,000 5% 2023 $300,000 5%
2024 $350,000 5% 2025 $400,000 5% 2026 $400,000 5%
2027 $380,000 5% 2028 $380,000 5% 2029 $320,000 5%
2030 $350,000 5% 2031 $430,000 5% 2032 $430,000 5%
2033 $430,000 5% 2034 $400,000 5%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Never Treated
Treated with
Year Scenario Criteria
Treated
Centerline Miles
Treated
Lane Miles
2015 59 59 0.43 0.86
2016 57 59 1.18 2.43
2017 55 59 1.58 3.21
2018 52 59 1.20 2.30
2019 50 59 1.48 3.04
2020 48 59 0.34 0.63
2021 46 59 2.02 3.92
2022 44 59 2.03 4.03
2023 42 59 1.22 2.54
2024 39 59 2.21 4.29
2025 37 59 0.52 1.04
2026 35 59 1.19 2.32
2027 33 59 1.28 2.57
2028 31 59 0.89 1.82
2029 29 59 1.63 3.18
2030 27 59 1.03 1.95
2031 26 59 2.58 5.25
2032 24 59 2.13 4.18
2033 23 59 2.89 5.66
2034 22 59 2.12 4.07
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2015, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 4.8% 33.7% 0.0% 38.5%
II / III 0.0% 5.8% 14.3% 0.0% 20.2%
IV 0.0% 5.9% 28.7% 0.0% 34.6%
V 0.0% 2.4% 4.3% 0.0% 6.8%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2015 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 MTC StreetSaver SS1035
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
I 0.0% 5.5% 35.6% 0.0% 41.2%
II / III 0.0% 5.1% 12.4% 0.0% 17.5%
IV 0.0% 5.9% 28.7% 0.0% 34.6%
V 0.0% 2.4% 4.3% 0.0% 6.7%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2034 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 15.6% 59.2% 0.0% 74.7%
V 0.0% 3.4% 21.9% 0.0% 25.3%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 MTC StreetSaver SS1035
Scenario 3A: Improve PCI to 75 by 2024 ($8.4 Million)
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
2015 $200,000
$185,838
$23,837
$23,768
$133,699
$4,534
$0 $0 $2,061,942 $14,165
$17,819
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2016 $400,000
$375,822
$57,483
$2,093
$130,326
$185,920
$24,133 $0 $1,948,700 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2017 $450,000
$422,536
$89,000
$0
$145,463
$188,073
$26,860 $0 $1,990,391 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2018 $450,000
$423,618
$6,159
$2,308
$37,160
$377,991
$25,855 $0 $1,704,509 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2019 $500,000
$473,457
$28,707
$0
$15,579
$429,171
$26,223 $0 $1,742,758 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2020 $600,000
$563,915
$20,405
$0
$35,909
$507,601
$13,445 $0 $1,629,430 $22,585
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2021 $600,000
$569,911
$0
$0
$11,793
$558,118
$29,743 $0 $1,291,460 $327
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2022 $700,000
$621,199
$30,941
$7,486
$100,154
$482,618
$75,810 $0 $1,026,326 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2023 $500,000
$456,407
$21,055
$0
$0
$435,352
$39,540 $0 $1,021,702 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $500,000
$461,438
$31,044
$21,488
$0
$408,906
$37,523 $0 $1,116,345 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $400,000
$292,176
$54,685
$3,247
$11,338
$222,906
$85,437 $0 $1,347,296 $22,279
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $300,000
$125,501
$4,762
$9,100
$44,684
$66,955
$174,362 $0 $1,518,008 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $410,000
$386,000
$47,297
$3,556
$0
$335,147
$23,324 $0 $1,273,405 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2028 $330,000
$245,608
$71,252
$0
$84,188
$90,168
$84,018 $0 $1,252,769 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $420,000
$86,101
$23,002
$39,280
$23,819
$0
$131,163 $0 $1,508,052 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2030 $530,000
$497,862
$40,926
$39,856
$0
$417,080
$3,859 $0 $1,587,587 $27,827
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2031 $450,000
$71,935
$28,599
$43,336
$0
$0
$231,993 $0 $1,498,403 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2032 $350,000
$57,696
$57,696
$0
$0
$0
$164,718 $0 $1,573,323 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2033 $590,000
$554,134
$120,450
$0
$0
$433,684
$34,155 $0 $1,292,152 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2034 $300,000
$185,357
$171,912
$13,445
$0
$0
$114,554 $0 $1,387,753 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 3 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Collector $927,532 $442,345 $7,433 $0
Residential/Local $6,128,979 $904,370 $79,751 $17,819
Grand Total: $7,056,511 $1,346,715 $87,184 $17,819
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 4 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $200,000 5% 2016 $400,000 5% 2017 $450,000 5%
2018 $450,000 5% 2019 $500,000 5% 2020 $600,000 5%
2021 $600,000 5% 2022 $700,000 5% 2023 $500,000 5%
2024 $500,000 5% 2025 $400,000 5% 2026 $300,000 5%
2027 $410,000 5% 2028 $330,000 5% 2029 $420,000 5%
2030 $530,000 5% 2031 $450,000 5% 2032 $350,000 5%
2033 $590,000 5% 2034 $300,000 5%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Never Treated
Treated with
Year Scenario Criteria
Treated
Centerline Miles
Treated
Lane Miles
2015 59 61 0.87 1.75
2016 57 62 1.88 3.83
2017 55 64 2.19 4.31
2018 52 66 2.01 3.90
2019 50 67 2.19 4.52
2020 48 69 2.24 4.19
2021 46 71 1.57 3.14
2022 44 73 3.30 6.59
2023 42 74 2.59 5.27
2024 39 75 1.63 3.08
2025 37 75 2.63 5.25
2026 35 75 3.25 6.27
2027 33 76 1.19 2.25
2028 31 75 3.49 6.93
2029 29 75 2.85 5.59
2030 27 75 1.03 1.93
2031 26 75 4.08 8.24
2032 24 75 3.59 7.02
2033 23 76 0.94 1.88
2034 22 75 2.07 4.04
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2015, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 4.8% 33.7% 0.0% 38.5%
II / III 0.0% 5.8% 14.3% 0.0% 20.2%
IV 0.0% 5.9% 28.7% 0.0% 34.6%
V 0.0% 2.4% 4.3% 0.0% 6.8%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2015 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 MTC StreetSaver SS1035
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 8.1% 35.6% 0.0% 43.7%
II / III 0.0% 5.1% 12.6% 0.0% 17.6%
IV 0.0% 3.4% 28.5% 0.0% 31.9%
V 0.0% 2.4% 4.3% 0.0% 6.7%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2034 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 19.0% 75.5% 0.0% 94.5%
V 0.0% 0.0% 5.5% 0.0% 5.5%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 MTC StreetSaver SS1035
Scenario 3B: Improve PCI to 75 by 2034 ($8.7 Million)
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
2015 $100,000
$93,324
$42,142
$23,768
$0
$27,414
$0 $0 $2,154,455 $6,679
$25,700
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2016 $200,000
$188,867
$38,263
$0
$140,384
$10,220
$11,101 $0 $2,243,731 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2017 $300,000
$280,647
$89,000
$2,198
$142,300
$47,149
$19,138 $0 $2,451,985 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2018 $300,000
$284,404
$6,159
$4,601
$152,736
$120,908
$15,264 $0 $2,341,219 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2019 $400,000
$372,613
$13,099
$0
$9,562
$349,952
$27,166 $0 $2,495,597 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2020 $400,000
$376,821
$4,017
$2,528
$8,883
$361,393
$0 $0 $2,603,950 $23,182
$17,031
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2021 $500,000
$470,102
$0
$0
$0
$470,102
$28,750 $0 $2,404,121 $81
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2022 $500,000
$473,774
$25,988
$7,486
$0
$440,300
$24,991 $9 $2,367,332 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2023 $500,000
$471,962
$54,615
$0
$0
$417,347
$27,770 $0 $2,390,205 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $500,000
$470,175
$72,250
$21,488
$0
$376,437
$29,590 $0 $2,553,643 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $500,000
$473,310
$36,702
$3,247
$14,335
$419,026
$0 $0 $2,747,185 $26,694
$19,099
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $500,000
$468,207
$23,706
$9,100
$11,904
$423,497
$31,632 $0 $2,735,790 $130
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $500,000
$431,257
$41,296
$3,556
$0
$386,405
$68,612 $0 $2,463,531 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
2028 $600,000
$493,511
$93,643
$0
$0
$399,868
$105,963 $0 $2,146,149 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $600,000
$528,986
$73,116
$0
$0
$455,870
$71,018 $0 $2,187,052 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2030 $600,000
$244,577
$30,922
$39,856
$0
$173,799
$244,051 $0 $2,227,121 $42,374
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2031 $500,000
$303,198
$24,099
$0
$19,210
$259,889
$104,885 $0 $2,233,335 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2032 $600,000
$451,422
$8,068
$4,569
$0
$438,785
$68,007 $0 $1,952,173 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2033 $650,000
$608,924
$117,973
$0
$0
$490,951
$37,484 $0 $1,655,684 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2034 $600,000
$116,741
$98,292
$18,449
$0
$0
$190,528 $0 $1,697,841 $0
$0
5%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 3 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year % PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Collector $1,041,287 $368,238 $4,253 $4,351
Residential/Local $6,561,535 $737,712 $94,886 $57,479
Grand Total: $7,602,822 $1,105,950 $99,139 $61,830
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 4 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $100,000 5% 2016 $200,000 5% 2017 $300,000 5%
2018 $300,000 5% 2019 $400,000 5% 2020 $400,000 5%
2021 $500,000 5% 2022 $500,000 5% 2023 $500,000 5%
2024 $500,000 5% 2025 $500,000 5% 2026 $500,000 5%
2027 $500,000 5% 2028 $600,000 5% 2029 $600,000 5%
2030 $600,000 5% 2031 $500,000 5% 2032 $600,000 5%
2033 $650,000 5% 2034 $600,000 5%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Never Treated
Treated with
Year Scenario Criteria
Treated
Centerline Miles
Treated
Lane Miles
2015 59 60 0.63 1.25
2016 57 59 1.18 2.43
2017 55 60 1.81 3.62
2018 52 60 1.28 2.42
2019 50 61 1.63 3.40
2020 48 63 0.78 1.51
2021 46 64 2.52 5.01
2022 44 66 1.99 3.91
2023 42 66 1.84 3.72
2024 39 67 2.31 4.47
2025 37 68 0.65 1.30
2026 35 68 1.42 2.81
2027 33 69 1.93 3.84
2028 31 70 2.00 4.04
2029 29 72 2.00 3.93
2030 27 73 5.37 10.63
2031 26 73 2.58 5.09
2032 24 74 1.72 3.29
2033 23 75 2.15 4.39
2034 22 75 3.46 6.80
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2015, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 4.8% 33.7% 0.0% 38.5%
II / III 0.0% 5.8% 14.3% 0.0% 20.2%
IV 0.0% 5.9% 28.7% 0.0% 34.6%
V 0.0% 2.4% 4.3% 0.0% 6.8%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2015 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 1 MTC StreetSaver SS1035
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 08/11/2015
Amador Multi-City
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5%
Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 5.5% 37.2% 0.0% 42.8%
II / III 0.0% 5.1% 11.1% 0.0% 16.2%
IV 0.0% 5.9% 28.7% 0.0% 34.6%
V 0.0% 2.4% 4.0% 0.0% 6.5%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2034 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 0.0% 19.0% 73.7% 0.0% 92.7%
V 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% 0.0% 7.3%
Total 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City 2 MTC StreetSaver SS1035

APPENDIX D

Section Selected for Treatments

Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget ($8.4 Million)

Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $2,000,000 5% 2016 $2,000,000 5% 2017 $2,000,000 5% 2018 $2,000,000 5% 2019 $2,000,000 5% 2020 $2,000,000 5% 2021 $2,000,000 5% 2022 $2,000,000 5% 2023 $2,000,000 5% 2024 $2,000,000 5% 2025 $2,000,000 5% 2026 $2,000,000 5% 2027 $2,000,000 5% 2028 $2,000,000 5% 2029 $2,000,000 5% 2030 $2,000,000 5% 2031 $2,000,000 5% 2032 $2,000,000 5% 2033 $2,000,000 5% 2034 $2,000,000 5%
Year: 2015
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$42,667 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 100

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$48,445 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 100

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$4,534 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 100
GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$22,880 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 100

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$55,587 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 100
HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$28,889 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 100
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
$9,734 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 100
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$36,560 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 100
ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 RL AC $91,067 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 100
ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 RL AC $39,556 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 100
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
$18,969 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $398,888
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$128,715 18,118 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 100
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 1
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $128,715
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$167,334 14,309 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC

OVERLAY
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $167,334
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$21,584 28,537 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR

WITH INLAYS
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $21,584
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 77 $6,080 18,175 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 71 $4,227 16,530 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 71 $18,305 16,535 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 73 $2,330 17,020 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 73 $2,696 17,019 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 78 $2,184 18,856 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 74 $1,482 17,286 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 77 $7,022 18,184 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $44,326
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 83 $2,677 33,523 SURFACE SEAL

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 83 $4,600 34,677 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 88 $2,339 31,368 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 92 $2,778 24,041 SURFACE SEAL
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 88 $2,436 29,366 SURFACE SEAL

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 88 $17,200 30,282 SURFACE SEAL

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 85 $653 33,749 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 86 $1,355 33,039 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 2
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2015
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 88 $11,882 29,366 SURFACE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 92 $10,252 24,012 SURFACE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 82 $1,937 35,259 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 88 $424 31,368 SURFACE SEAL
N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 85 $6,327 33,735 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 92 $1,400 24,012 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 92 $1,181 22,008 SURFACE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 88 $11,616 31,348 SURFACE SEAL SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 88 $2,512 31,372 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 90 $2,237 27,586 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 89 $3,612 36,087 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 94 $8,417 15,381 SURFACE SEAL
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 94 $4,720 15,014 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $100,555

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$68,860 5,459 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 58
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
$14,062 5,645 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 60

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$30,457 5,740 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 61
DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$38,407 5,608 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 60
DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
$73,147 5,551 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 59
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 3
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2015
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$14,680 5,785 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 62
MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$20,860 5,696 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 61

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$12,155 5,607 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 60
NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
$4,984 5,833 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 63
PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 PATRLN 200 RL AC/P CC
$80,687 5,646 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,862 26 48,412 4/15/2015 60
RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$31,350 5,513 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 59
RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$15,030 5,549 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 59
RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$59,760 5,410 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 58
SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
$11,000 5,549 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 59
SUTTER CREST WEST MEADOW CREST END SUTTCW 100 RL AC/P
CC
$109,150 5,740 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,770 37 65,490 4/16/2015 61

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$8,190 5,606 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 60
WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
$6,002 5,551 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 59
Treatment Total $598,781
Year 2015 Area Total 996,510 Year 2015 Total $1,460,183 Year: 2016
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
$130,326 16,932 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $130,326
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $2,331 13,567 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 4
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2016
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 70 $12,792 14,123 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 71 $6,166 14,250 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 78 $13,794 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 71 $2,093 14,395 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 78 $4,505 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 78 $17,633 18,110 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SUTTER CREST WEST MEADOW CREST END SUTTCW 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,770 37 65,490 4/16/2015 70 $45,843 14,123 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $105,157
JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 RL AC $73,483 5,359 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 63
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$7,308 5,617 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 63
Treatment Total $80,791
Year 2016 Area Total 247,164 Year 2016 Total $316,274
Year: 2017
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$16,170 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 100
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 RL AC $10,065 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 100

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$36,162 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 100

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$46,923 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 100

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$14,700 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 100
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 5
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $124,020

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$145,463 16,210 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $145,463

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 78 $13,432 13,774 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $4,660 15,815 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $20,181 15,820 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $2,707 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 79 $17,052 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 RL AC 71 $30,863 13,793 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 78 $15,281 17,399 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $6,610 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 72 $3,070 13,930 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 79 $22,509 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SUTTER CREST WEST MEADOW CREST END SUTTCW 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,770 37 65,490 4/16/2015 78 $48,136 13,774 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $184,501
AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END AMAPDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
662 36 23,832 4/9/2015 95 $7,299 12,761 SURFACE SEAL
BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 94 $1,803 13,302 SURFACE SEAL CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 94 $1,222 13,439 SURFACE SEAL

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 95 $1,158 12,341 SURFACE SEAL
HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 94 $6,086 12,858 SURFACE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 79 $4,228 32,319 SURFACE SEAL
LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 91 $7,087 28,530 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 6
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2017
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PEARST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 29 13,340 4/14/2015 95 $4,086 12,705 SURFACE SEAL

SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SILKLN 100 245 25 8,857 4/16/2015 RL AC 94 $2,713 12,858 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 93 $490 18,264 SURFACE SEAL
VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 82 $1,960 24,435 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $38,132

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,346 5,414 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 63
PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$35,391 5,415 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 63
TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
$5,458 5,414 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 63

VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT
CHANGE
VALLWY 100 RL AC/P
CC
$74,504 5,415 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,067 38 40,546 4/16/2015 63
Treatment Total $138,699
Year 2017 Area Total 530,280 Year 2017 Total $630,815
Year: 2018
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 72 $9,806 13,480 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 77 $6,798 13,242 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $2,308 13,376 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 72 $14,864 13,484 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,019 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,140 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 72 $2,293 13,480 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 7
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2018
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT
CHANGE
VALLWY 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,067 38 40,546 4/16/2015 72 $31,292 13,484 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $73,520

BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT
CHANGE
BOWEDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
454 37 16,798 4/16/2015 94 $5,402 15,293 SURFACE SEAL

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 94 $1,062 14,408 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 94 $4,583 29,301 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
1,425 22 31,350 4/15/2015 94 $10,081 15,444 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 94 $2,251 15,454 SURFACE SEAL
OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END OPALST 100 RL AC/P
CC
350 18 6,300 4/14/2015 94 $2,026 15,454 SURFACE SEAL
RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE RUBYST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 21 9,660 4/14/2015 94 $3,107 15,454 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT
CHANGE
GOLDEN HILLS DR SUTTCE 200 RL AC/P
CC
785 37 29,045 4/16/2015 94 $9,340 15,311 SURFACE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT
CHANGE
HIGHWAY 49 VALLWY 200 RL AC/P
CC
427 38 16,226 4/16/2015 94 $5,218 15,433 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $43,070
BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 RL AC $20,759 4,900 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 62
Treatment Total $20,759
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$58 1,333,
990
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$18 1,333,
990
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 85 $30 897,728 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
$37 1,261,
803
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $143
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 8
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year 2018 Area Total 352,091 Year 2018 Total $137,492
Year: 2019
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,900 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 100
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
$119,088 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 100
NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET NICKST 100 RL AC/P CC
$37,400 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
301 23 6,923 4/9/2015 100
SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET SPANST 100 RL AC/P CC
$29,173 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
270 20 5,400 4/9/2015 100
SPANISH STREET HAYDEN STREET BADGER STREET SPANST 300 RL AC/P CC
$200,964 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,240 30 37,200 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $410,525
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
$286,183 11,772 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC

OVERLAY
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $286,183
BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 RL AC 71 $8,719 12,676 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $2,833 14,566 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 RL AC 78 $34,027 13,243 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $3,278 14,565 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 78 $3,384 12,994 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 78 $1,801 14,805 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $54,042

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$54,269 4,987 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 63
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
$9,562 4,986 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 63

SUTTER CREST EAST SUTTER CREST
WEST

PAVEMENT
CHANGE
SUTTCE 100 RL AC/P
CC
$91,447 4,936 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,220 37 45,140 4/16/2015 62
Treatment Total $155,278
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 9
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2019
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 89 $94 675,687 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
$59 1,270,
467
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $153
Year 2019 Area Total 390,934 Year 2019 Total $906,181
Year: 2020
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$22,786 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 100
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$46,962 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 100
MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
MEADCR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$101,309 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
470 38 17,860 4/16/2015 100
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$91,144 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 100
PROSPECT DRIVE RIDGE ROAD 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
PROSDR 100 RL AC $158,464 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
873 32 27,936 7/15/2015 100
PROSPECT DRIVE 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
STERRA WEST CT PROSDR 200 RL AC $112,540 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
620 32 19,840 7/15/2015 100
STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$17,035 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $550,240

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 72 $22,793 12,488 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 RL AC 79 $9,155 13,039 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 78 $10,811 12,631 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 72 $4,017 12,484 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 78 $16,388 12,634 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST SUTTER CREST
WEST

PAVEMENT
CHANGE
SUTTCE 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,220 37 45,140 4/16/2015 71 $38,408 12,364 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 10
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2020
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 78 $2,528 12,631 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT
CHANGE
VALLWY 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,067 38 40,546 4/16/2015 78 $34,499 12,635 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $138,599

BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BROAST 100 RL AC/P
CC
677 40 27,080 4/10/2015 91 $9,601 19,249 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $9,601

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$87,885 4,361 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 62
RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$40,012 4,386 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 63
RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$76,271 4,335 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 62
Treatment Total $204,168

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$65 1,209,
968
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 76 $125 640,391 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 76 $165 640,385 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$3 1,080,
554
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $358
Year 2020 Area Total 492,351 Year 2020 Total $902,966
Year: 2021
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$218,388 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $218,388
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 11
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2021
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 71 $36,912 10,584 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 71 $16,805 10,694 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 71 $32,034 10,503 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $85,751
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
$19,432 4,590 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 63
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
$18,844 4,259 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 63
DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$51,469 4,223 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 62
DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
$98,024 4,202 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 62
EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$16,122 4,542 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 62
KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$11,793 4,590 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 63

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$16,289 4,222 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 62
PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 PATRLN 200 RL AC/P CC
$108,128 4,260 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
1,862 26 48,412 4/15/2015 63
RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$20,142 4,201 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 62
SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
$14,742 4,201 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 62

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$10,976 4,221 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 62
WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
$8,043 4,202 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 62
Treatment Total $394,004
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 83 $174 711,281 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $54 711,281 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 12
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2021
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 82 $53 667,937 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 83 $102 706,416 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $383
Year 2021 Area Total 421,198 Year 2021 Total $698,526
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 78 $25,129 11,810 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 72 $8,162 11,591 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 78 $8,556 13,120 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $3,124 10,100 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 72 $7,915 10,412 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 71 $21,617 10,337 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 71 $41,170 10,235 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 71 $6,771 11,454 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 72 $4,953 11,592 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 78 $4,428 11,804 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 71 $6,842 10,335 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 PATRLN 200 RL AC/P CC
1,862 26 48,412 4/15/2015 72 $45,414 10,415 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 71 $8,460 10,232 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 13
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 78 $33,636 10,069 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 71 $6,192 10,232 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST SUTTER CREST
WEST

PAVEMENT
CHANGE
SUTTCE 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,220 37 45,140 4/16/2015 78 $42,345 11,658 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 78 $9,880 13,124 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,454 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $5,032 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 71 $4,610 10,334 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 71 $3,378 10,235 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $300,068
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 89 $20,582 26,025 SURFACE SEAL GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 90 $19,622 27,612 SURFACE SEAL RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 89 $6,328 26,025 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 87 $5,082 28,327 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 89 $11,844 26,222 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $63,458
MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$29,353 4,065 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 62
Treatment Total $29,353
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 83 $176 677,411 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $176
Year 2022 Area Total 545,507 Year 2022 Total $393,055
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 14
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 77 $40,696 9,693 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 78 $43,229 9,882 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 79 $3,627 10,043 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 71 $12,328 9,982 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 79 $8,858 10,044 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 78 $18,528 9,786 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 78 $8,883 9,880 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 78 $6,501 9,879 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $6,304 7,965 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 78 $3,547 9,882 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $152,501

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 87 $3,940 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 80 $3,955 23,122 SURFACE SEAL

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 81 $6,797 23,995 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 84 $3,455 23,211 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 87 $4,105 21,878 SURFACE SEAL
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 84 $3,599 22,568 SURFACE SEAL

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 85 $25,413 22,954 SURFACE SEAL

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 82 $965 23,767 SURFACE SEAL

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 87 $4,474 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 15
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 87 $419 20,913 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 83 $2,001 23,613 SURFACE SEAL
GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 84 $17,554 22,568 SURFACE SEAL GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 87 $2,113 20,913 SURFACE SEAL

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 87 $5,133 20,913 SURFACE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 87 $15,146 21,873 SURFACE SEAL HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 87 $2,668 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 87 $899 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 79 $2,862 24,115 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 79 $1,345 30,884 SURFACE SEAL
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 87 $3,376 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 84 $626 23,211 SURFACE SEAL
N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 82 $9,348 23,763 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 89 $20,839 24,785 SURFACE SEAL ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 RL AC 87 $8,410 20,913 SURFACE SEAL ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 RL AC 87 $3,653 20,913 SURFACE SEAL PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 87 $2,069 21,873 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 87 $1,745 21,598 SURFACE SEAL
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 87 $1,752 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 16
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 84 $17,162 23,204 SURFACE SEAL SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 84 $3,711 23,213 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 86 $3,304 22,405 SURFACE SEAL
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 88 $6,974 20,997 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $189,812
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 89 $160 555,890 SEAL CRACKS

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 83 $196 645,153 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 73 $155 545,066 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 73 $205 545,108 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 83 $7 636,307 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $723
Year 2023 Area Total 797,320 Year 2023 Total $343,036
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 78 $8,998 11,021 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 78 $8,726 9,605 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 77 $18,900 9,793 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 77 $23,833 9,501 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 78 $7,465 10,883 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 17
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $14,277 9,574 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 78 $9,110 9,892 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 78 $5,461 11,022 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 77 $7,543 9,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 PATRLN 200 RL AC/P CC
1,862 26 48,412 4/15/2015 78 $50,069 9,607 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SUTTER CREST WEST MEADOW CREST END SUTTCW 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,770 37 65,490 4/16/2015 77 $67,731 9,793 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 77 $5,083 9,498 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $227,196

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 89 $23,260 23,605 SURFACE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 80 $9,998 29,126 SURFACE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 79 $8,492 29,724 SURFACE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 79 $2,773 29,724 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 80 $13,197 29,126 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 79 $10,855 29,710 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 89 $690 23,978 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $69,265
Year 2024 Area Total 380,402 Year 2024 Total $296,461
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 18
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2025
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $6,885 10,696 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $29,817 10,699 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 RL AC 79 $45,599 9,940 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 77 $13,592 9,232 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 77 $3,247 9,490 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $99,140
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 87 $1,494 18,968 SURFACE SEAL
AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END AMAPDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
662 36 23,832 4/9/2015 88 $10,784 18,992 SURFACE SEAL
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 RL AC 87 $930 18,968 SURFACE SEAL BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 87 $2,664 19,230 SURFACE SEAL CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 88 $1,806 19,033 SURFACE SEAL

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 88 $1,711 18,969 SURFACE SEAL

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 87 $3,340 18,968 SURFACE SEAL

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 87 $4,333 18,968 SURFACE SEAL
HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 87 $8,992 19,211 SURFACE SEAL LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 89 $10,470 21,939 SURFACE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 79 $9,407 28,589 SURFACE SEAL
PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PEARST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 29 13,340 4/14/2015 88 $6,036 18,989 SURFACE SEAL

SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SILKLN 100 245 25 8,857 4/16/2015 RL AC 87 $4,008 19,211 SURFACE SEAL

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 87 $1,358 18,968 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $67,333
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 19
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2025
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 85 $171 630,298 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 86 $181 522,464 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 85 $53 630,298 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 84 $51 593,275 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 85 $100 626,385 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $556
Year 2025 Area Total 402,432 Year 2025 Total $167,029
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 78 $4,762 9,235 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,983 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $6,117 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $13,862

BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT
CHANGE
BOWEDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
454 37 16,798 4/16/2015 88 $7,981 18,304 SURFACE SEAL
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 90 $33,558 22,717 SURFACE SEAL

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 88 $1,568 18,240 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 94 $6,771 21,480 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
1,425 22 31,350 4/15/2015 88 $14,895 18,314 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 88 $3,326 18,315 SURFACE SEAL
OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END OPALST 100 RL AC/P
CC
350 18 6,300 4/14/2015 88 $2,994 18,315 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 20
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE RUBYST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 21 9,660 4/14/2015 88 $4,590 18,315 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT
CHANGE
GOLDEN HILLS DR SUTTCE 200 RL AC/P
CC
785 37 29,045 4/16/2015 88 $13,800 18,305 SURFACE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT
CHANGE
HIGHWAY 49 VALLWY 200 RL AC/P
CC
427 38 16,226 4/16/2015 88 $7,709 18,313 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $97,192
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 85 $173 600,284 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $173
Year 2026 Area Total 267,494 Year 2026 Total $111,227
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 RL AC 78 $12,882 9,261 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 78 $15,211 8,978 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $4,185 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $4,842 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 78 $23,059 8,981 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 78 $3,556 8,978 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT
CHANGE
VALLWY 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,067 38 40,546 4/16/2015 78 $48,544 8,981 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $112,279
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 87 $2,207 17,205 SURFACE SEAL
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 87 $10,997 17,205 SURFACE SEAL NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET NICKST 100 RL AC/P CC
301 23 6,923 4/9/2015 87 $3,454 17,205 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 21
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 79 $1,109 24,090 SURFACE SEAL
SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET SPANST 100 RL AC/P CC
270 20 5,400 4/9/2015 87 $2,694 17,205 SURFACE SEAL
SPANISH STREET HAYDEN STREET BADGER STREET SPANST 300 RL AC/P CC
1,240 30 37,200 4/9/2015 87 $18,558 17,205 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $39,019

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 85 $193 571,699 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 78 $164 464,750 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 78 $216 464,789 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 85 $6 564,400 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $579
Year 2027 Area Total 281,390 Year 2027 Total $151,877
Year: 2028
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 77 $4,187 7,539 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 78 $45,075 7,516 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 77 $8,046 6,271 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $57,308

BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BROAST 100 RL AC/P
CC
677 40 27,080 4/10/2015 87 $14,185 17,205 SURFACE SEAL
FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 87 $2,105 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 87 $4,337 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 22
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2028
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
MEADCR 100 RL AC/P
CC
470 38 17,860 4/16/2015 87 $9,355 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 87 $8,417 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
PROSPECT DRIVE RIDGE ROAD 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
PROSDR 100 873 32 27,936 7/15/2015 RL AC 87 $14,633 16,386 SURFACE SEAL PROSPECT DRIVE 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
STERRA WEST CT PROSDR 200 620 32 19,840 7/15/2015 RL AC 87 $10,393 16,386 SURFACE SEAL STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 87 $1,573 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $64,998
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 81 $305 473,566 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 81 $297 414,286 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 81 $94 473,566 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 81 $81 463,290 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 81 $176 472,988 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $953
Year 2028 Area Total 332,013 Year 2028 Total $123,259
Year: 2029
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 77 $54,536 7,233 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 79 $57,931 7,372 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 79 $6,231 8,400 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 78 $24,829 7,302 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 23
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2029
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 79 $11,904 7,370 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 79 $8,712 7,370 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST SUTTER CREST
WEST

PAVEMENT
CHANGE
SUTTCE 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,220 37 45,140 4/16/2015 78 $59,583 8,293 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 79 $4,754 7,372 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $228,480

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 87 $20,167 15,605 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 87 $28,960 20,222 SURFACE SEAL GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 87 $27,610 20,253 SURFACE SEAL RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 87 $8,904 20,222 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 87 $7,150 20,841 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 87 $16,665 20,271 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $109,456
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 86 $308 429,832 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 81 $308 451,015 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $616
Year 2029 Area Total 493,513 Year 2029 Total $338,552
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 77 $37,127 7,959 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 77 $13,354 6,836 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 24
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 78 $11,694 7,162 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 78 $25,327 7,304 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 78 $31,938 7,095 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $5,104 7,140 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $19,132 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 78 $9,663 7,144 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 78 $10,108 7,092 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $12,464 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 PATRLN 200 RL AC/P CC
1,862 26 48,412 4/15/2015 78 $67,097 7,164 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SUTTER CREST WEST MEADOW CREST END SUTTCW 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,770 37 65,490 4/16/2015 78 $90,767 7,304 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $3,626 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $7,435 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 78 $6,811 7,091 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $351,647
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 79 $5,267 21,437 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 87 $29,323 19,259 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 79 $6,083 21,449 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $40,673

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 81 $344 429,538 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 25
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 75 $209 394,414 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 75 $275 394,409 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 81 $11 428,458 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $839
Year 2030 Area Total 433,544 Year 2030 Total $393,159
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 78 $24,099 6,802 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 78 $10,504 7,758 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 78 $12,818 7,020 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 78 $18,214 6,891 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $4,352 7,104 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $69,987

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 83 $5,821 15,448 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 81 $5,104 16,173 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 84 $6,064 15,851 SURFACE SEAL
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 80 $5,318 15,663 SURFACE SEAL

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 82 $37,546 16,117 SURFACE SEAL

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 80 $1,425 16,296 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 26
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 87 $32,728 18,342 SURFACE SEAL

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 83 $6,610 15,448 SURFACE SEAL

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 83 $619 15,448 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 80 $2,956 16,262 SURFACE SEAL
GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 80 $25,935 15,663 SURFACE SEAL GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 83 $3,122 15,448 SURFACE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 82 $14,067 20,607 SURFACE SEAL

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 83 $7,584 15,448 SURFACE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 84 $22,377 15,850 SURFACE SEAL HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 83 $3,942 15,448 SURFACE SEAL
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 83 $1,328 15,448 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 80 $1,987 21,079 SURFACE SEAL
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 83 $4,988 15,448 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 81 $925 16,173 SURFACE SEAL
N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 80 $13,811 16,295 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 82 $18,569 20,606 SURFACE SEAL ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 RL AC 83 $12,425 15,448 SURFACE SEAL ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 RL AC 83 $5,397 15,448 SURFACE SEAL PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 84 $3,057 15,850 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 27
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 84 $2,578 15,794 SURFACE SEAL
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 83 $2,588 15,448 SURFACE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 81 $25,355 16,171 SURFACE SEAL SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 81 $5,483 16,173 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 83 $4,882 15,991 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 87 $971 18,436 SURFACE SEAL
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 84 $10,304 15,640 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $295,866
Year 2031 Area Total 536,012 Year 2031 Total $365,853
Year: 2032
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 78 $13,294 7,448 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 RL AC 78 $64,162 7,056 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 78 $8,068 7,449 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $9,780 5,130 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $95,304

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 80 $12,546 20,318 SURFACE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 80 $4,097 20,318 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 80 $16,038 20,309 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $32,681
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 28
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2032
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 81 $508 340,834 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 84 $289 420,011 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 83 $334 346,985 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 84 $89 420,011 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 83 $77 408,866 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 84 $167 419,152 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,464
Year 2032 Area Total 346,677 Year 2032 Total $129,449
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $5,343 5,917 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $10,172 7,233 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $44,053 7,236 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 78 $6,701 6,559 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $66,269
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 83 $2,207 14,012 SURFACE SEAL
AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END AMAPDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
662 36 23,832 4/9/2015 84 $15,932 14,172 SURFACE SEAL
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 RL AC 83 $1,374 14,012 SURFACE SEAL BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 82 $3,935 14,029 SURFACE SEAL BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 87 $47,219 16,662 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 29
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 84 $2,668 14,183 SURFACE SEAL

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 84 $2,527 14,167 SURFACE SEAL

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 83 $4,934 14,012 SURFACE SEAL

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 83 $6,402 14,012 SURFACE SEAL
HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 83 $13,285 14,027 SURFACE SEAL LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 87 $15,468 15,613 SURFACE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 80 $13,899 19,569 SURFACE SEAL
PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PEARST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 29 13,340 4/14/2015 84 $8,918 14,171 SURFACE SEAL

SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SILKLN 100 245 25 8,857 4/16/2015 RL AC 83 $5,921 14,027 SURFACE SEAL

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 83 $2,006 14,012 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $146,695
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 84 $293 400,011 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $293
Year 2033 Area Total 311,507 Year 2033 Total $213,257
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 RL AC 78 $18,125 6,577 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 78 $21,404 6,382 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 78 $32,447 6,384 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 78 $60,405 5,609 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 30
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,408 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $9,037 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 78 $5,004 6,382 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT
CHANGE
VALLWY 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,067 38 40,546 4/16/2015 78 $68,306 6,384 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $219,136

BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT
CHANGE
BOWEDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
454 37 16,798 4/16/2015 84 $11,792 13,559 SURFACE SEAL

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 84 $2,317 13,539 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 93 $10,003 15,055 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
1,425 22 31,350 4/15/2015 84 $22,006 13,562 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 84 $4,914 13,562 SURFACE SEAL
OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END OPALST 100 RL AC/P
CC
350 18 6,300 4/14/2015 84 $4,423 13,562 SURFACE SEAL
RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE RUBYST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 21 9,660 4/14/2015 84 $6,781 13,562 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT
CHANGE
GOLDEN HILLS DR SUTTCE 200 RL AC/P
CC
785 37 29,045 4/16/2015 84 $20,388 13,559 SURFACE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT
CHANGE
HIGHWAY 49 VALLWY 200 RL AC/P
CC
427 38 16,226 4/16/2015 84 $11,390 13,562 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $94,014

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 84 $327 380,963 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 79 $214 336,714 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 79 $282 336,718 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 83 $10 379,335 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 31
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $833
Year 2034 Area Total 373,403 Year 2034 Total $313,983
Total Section Area: 8,931,742 Grand Total $8,392,634
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained
Budget
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 32
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 59 ($6.4 Million)

Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $60,000 5% 2016 $200,000 5% 2017 $250,000 5%
2018 $300,000 5% 2019 $220,000 5% 2020 $250,000 5%
2021 $300,000 5% 2022 $300,000 5% 2023 $300,000 5%
2024 $350,000 5% 2025 $400,000 5% 2026 $400,000 5%
2027 $380,000 5% 2028 $380,000 5% 2029 $320,000 5%
2030 $350,000 5% 2031 $430,000 5% 2032 $430,000 5%
2033 $430,000 5% 2034 $400,000 5%
Year: 2015
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$4,534 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $4,534
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$21,584 28,537 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR

WITH INLAYS
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $21,584
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 77 $6,080 18,175 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 71 $4,227 16,530 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 73 $2,330 17,020 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 73 $2,696 17,019 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 78 $2,184 18,856 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 74 $1,482 17,286 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 77 $7,022 18,184 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $26,021
Year 2015 Area Total 56,237 Year 2015 Total $52,139
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 1
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2016
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
$10,220 8,096 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $10,220
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$135,151 17,587 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $135,151
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $2,331 13,567 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 78 $13,794 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 78 $4,505 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 78 $17,633 18,110 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $38,263

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 82 $4,830 33,455 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 80 $2,034 33,815 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 86 $445 31,107 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 88 $3,792 37,267 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $11,101
NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
$5,233 5,522 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 61
Treatment Total $5,233
Year 2016 Area Total 150,552 Year 2016 Total $199,968
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 2
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2017
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$16,170 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 100
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 RL AC $10,065 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $26,235
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
$136,842 16,481 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $136,842
EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $4,660 15,815 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $2,707 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 79 $17,052 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 78 $15,281 17,399 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $6,610 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 70 $2,198 13,646 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 79 $22,509 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $71,017

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 83 $720 31,723 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 84 $1,493 31,395 SURFACE SEAL
HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 79 $4,228 32,319 SURFACE SEAL
N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 83 $6,976 31,716 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 88 $2,466 28,333 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $15,883
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 3
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year 2017 Area Total 204,603 Year 2017 Total $249,977
Year: 2018
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$49,392 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 100

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$56,081 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 100

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$15,435 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $120,908

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$152,736 15,769 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $152,736
NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $2,308 13,396 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,019 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,140 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $8,467
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 79 $3,099 29,514 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 84 $2,707 29,712 SURFACE SEAL
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 84 $2,820 28,528 SURFACE SEAL FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 94 $4,583 29,301 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 88 $1,621 26,477 SURFACE SEAL
SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 84 $2,908 29,713 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $17,738
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$18 1,333,
990
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $18
Year 2018 Area Total 159,786 Year 2018 Total $299,867
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 4
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2019
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,900 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 100

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$39,869 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 100
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
$119,088 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $182,857
GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $2,833 14,566 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $3,278 14,565 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 78 $1,801 14,805 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $5,187 9,693 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $13,099

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 87 $3,377 26,396 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 89 $10,231 30,457 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 91 $541 26,025 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $14,149
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
$9,562 4,986 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 63
Treatment Total $9,562
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$61 1,270,
467
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 84 $36 808,039 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $97
Year 2019 Area Total 162,285 Year 2019 Total $219,764
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 5
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2020
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$17,035 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $17,035
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$213,565 11,211 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC

OVERLAY
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $213,565
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 72 $4,017 12,484 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $4,017
Year 2020 Area Total 57,923 Year 2020 Total $234,617
Year: 2021
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$218,388 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 100
FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,926 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 100
GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$30,662 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $272,976
BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 89 $2,192 20,959 SURFACE SEAL CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 90 $1,486 20,775 SURFACE SEAL
LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 88 $8,614 27,875 SURFACE SEAL PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 85 $1,583 25,028 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $13,875
KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$11,793 4,590 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 63
Treatment Total $11,793
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 6
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2021
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$69 1,152,
351
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 74 $138 599,704 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 74 $182 599,753 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 86 $112 842,128 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $54 711,281 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $555
Year 2021 Area Total 263,139 Year 2021 Total $299,199
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$78,217 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 100

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$59,887 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 100
HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$40,650 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 100
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$51,776 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $230,530
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 78 $8,556 13,120 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $3,124 10,100 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 72 $4,953 11,592 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 78 $4,428 11,804 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 78 $9,880 13,124 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,454 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 7
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $5,032 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $38,427

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 89 $1,290 20,405 SURFACE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 79 $16,344 25,314 SURFACE SEAL RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 89 $6,328 26,025 SURFACE SEAL
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 86 $6,642 23,256 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $30,604
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 83 $182 677,411 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 81 $60 623,128 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 85 $87 723,157 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 86 $4 808,603 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $333
Year 2022 Area Total 253,675 Year 2022 Total $299,894
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$54,016 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 100
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$105,511 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $159,527

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 79 $60,990 10,043 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 77 $42,130 9,621 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 8
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 79 $3,627 10,043 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 79 $8,858 10,044 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $115,605

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 88 $1,552 20,995 SURFACE SEAL

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 87 $419 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 82 $15,146 23,774 SURFACE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 79 $1,345 30,884 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 87 $5,336 27,756 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $23,798
Year 2023 Area Total 199,641 Year 2023 Total $298,930
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
$58,172 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 100
DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$158,884 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $217,056
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 79 $9,965 9,186 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 78 $23,993 12,104 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $14,277 9,574 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 78 $5,461 11,022 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 78 $7,211 9,576 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 9
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 78 $31,672 12,104 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 77 $6,620 7,635 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $99,199

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 80 $7,137 22,934 SURFACE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 79 $8,492 29,724 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 83 $657 22,376 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 87 $3,017 20,860 SURFACE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 79 $2,773 29,724 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 79 $10,855 29,710 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $32,931

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 83 $206 614,431 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 89 $120 529,419 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $326
Year 2024 Area Total 307,984 Year 2024 Total $349,512
Year: 2025
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$299,109 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 100

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$52,798 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $351,907
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 10
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2025
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $6,885 10,696 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $3,247 9,504 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $10,132
Year 2025 Area Total 57,939 Year 2025 Total $362,039
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$138,910 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 100
JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$66,955 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 100
MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$95,141 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 100
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
$32,444 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $333,450

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 78 $23,706 11,220 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,983 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $6,117 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $32,806
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 94 $6,771 21,480 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 85 $25,017 25,358 SURFACE SEAL LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 85 $1,041 19,298 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 87 $761 24,097 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $33,590
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $70 552,285 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 11
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 83 $57 551,378 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $127
Year 2027 Area Total 172,520 Year 2027 Total $399,973
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
MEADCR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$142,552 4,734 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
470 38 17,860 4/16/2015 100
NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET NICKST 100 RL AC/P CC
$55,257 4,734 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
301 23 6,923 4/9/2015 100
ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 RL AC $71,037 4,734 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 100
SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET SPANST 100 RL AC/P CC
$43,101 4,734 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
270 20 5,400 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $311,947

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 77 $2,814 8,259 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 78 $5,837 8,268 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $4,185 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $4,842 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 77 $27,269 8,260 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $44,947
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 85 $1,647 18,379 SURFACE SEAL
RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 79 $1,109 24,090 SURFACE SEAL
SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 80 $4,511 19,782 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 84 $15,116 24,350 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 12
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $22,383

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 76 $178 455,549 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 76 $234 455,544 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $412
Year 2027 Area Total 175,310 Year 2027 Total $379,689
Year: 2028
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 RL AC $90,168 4,508 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 100
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$34,998 4,508 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 100
RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$157,641 4,508 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $282,807
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 77 $4,187 7,539 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $11,024 7,533 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $53,769 7,553 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $8,046 6,243 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $77,026
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 RL AC 83 $1,076 17,825 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 79 $4,409 18,880 SURFACE SEAL
OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END OPALST 100 RL AC/P
CC
350 18 6,300 4/14/2015 82 $3,300 18,669 SURFACE SEAL
PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PEARST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 29 13,340 4/14/2015 82 $6,988 18,686 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 81 $4,217 18,814 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $19,990
Year 2028 Area Total 133,177 Year 2028 Total $379,823
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 13
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2029
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$111,801 4,294 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 100
RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$79,356 4,294 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $191,157
HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $26,231 7,196 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 79 $6,231 8,400 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 78 $55,194 7,503 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SILKLN 100 245 25 8,857 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $11,691 7,196 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $99,347
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 81 $27,926 22,788 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $27,926
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 82 $315 452,693 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 80 $88 438,871 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 83 $9 473,879 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $412
Year 2029 Area Total 215,019 Year 2029 Total $318,842
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
$60,982 4,089 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 100
TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
$27,442 4,089 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 100

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$45,404 4,089 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 100
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 14
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
$33,273 4,089 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $167,101
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $13,354 6,838 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 78 $85,819 7,141 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $5,104 7,140 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $19,132 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 78 $9,663 7,141 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $12,464 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $3,626 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $7,435 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $156,597
Year 2030 Area Total 131,071 Year 2030 Total $323,698
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 78 $13,272 8,423 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END AMAPDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
662 36 23,832 4/9/2015 78 $34,682 6,807 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 78 $24,099 6,798 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT
CHANGE
BOWEDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
454 37 16,798 4/16/2015 78 $24,446 6,804 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BROAST 100 RL AC/P
CC
677 40 27,080 4/10/2015 78 $39,409 6,804 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
1,425 22 31,350 4/15/2015 78 $45,623 6,805 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 78 $33,761 8,570 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 15
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 78 $44,566 8,570 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 78 $7,335 6,801 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE RUBYST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 21 9,660 4/14/2015 78 $14,058 6,805 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT
CHANGE
GOLDEN HILLS DR SUTTCE 200 RL AC/P
CC
785 37 29,045 4/16/2015 78 $42,268 6,804 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 78 $15,327 8,428 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT
CHANGE
HIGHWAY 49 VALLWY 200 RL AC/P
CC
427 38 16,226 4/16/2015 78 $23,613 6,805 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $362,459

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 81 $32,728 20,697 SURFACE SEAL

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 83 $619 15,448 SURFACE SEAL
LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 84 $14,030 18,067 SURFACE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 80 $1,987 21,079 SURFACE SEAL
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $9,816 20,383 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 85 $7,883 19,851 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $67,063
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 80 $231 396,710 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $231
Year 2031 Area Total 389,963 Year 2031 Total $429,753
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 16
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2032
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$272,883 3,709 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $272,883

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 77 $15,281 6,470 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 78 $56,390 6,478 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 78 $8,068 7,449 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 77 $4,569 6,743 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $84,308
CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 82 $2,541 15,327 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 81 $31,961 16,460 SURFACE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 80 $12,546 20,318 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 81 $971 15,473 SURFACE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 80 $4,097 20,318 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 79 $2,707 15,536 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 80 $16,038 20,309 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $70,861
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 79 $449 370,514 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 78 $448 369,550 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 80 $13 378,705 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $910
Year 2032 Area Total 298,289 Year 2032 Total $428,962
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 17
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
$93,056 3,532 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 100
EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$77,205 3,532 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $170,261

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 77 $15,403 5,906 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $5,343 5,917 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 78 $3,771 6,174 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 77 $17,489 5,906 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $10,172 7,233 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 79 $7,822 6,165 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 78 $36,543 6,174 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 77 $10,269 4,915 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 77 $4,814 5,906 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $111,626
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 79 $2,958 14,209 SURFACE SEAL

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 82 $24,513 14,121 SURFACE SEAL
BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 79 $3,935 14,219 SURFACE SEAL

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 82 $2,207 14,636 SURFACE SEAL

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 82 $2,527 14,618 SURFACE SEAL

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 79 $4,934 14,209 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 18
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 79 $14,737 14,209 SURFACE SEAL FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 82 $2,686 14,121 SURFACE SEAL
GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 82 $3,442 14,121 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 85 $35,201 17,927 SURFACE SEAL

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 83 $8,361 13,967 SURFACE SEAL

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 83 $6,402 13,967 SURFACE SEAL
HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 83 $4,346 13,967 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 83 $5,535 13,967 SURFACE SEAL
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 85 $5,500 13,714 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 82 $4,680 14,577 SURFACE SEAL
STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 80 $2,008 14,196 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 86 $1,070 17,375 SURFACE SEAL
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 79 $11,360 14,790 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $146,402
Year 2033 Area Total 304,474 Year 2033 Total $428,289
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 RL AC $230,121 3,364 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $230,121
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 77 $14,773 5,625 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 19
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $72,056 5,623 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,408 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $9,037 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $100,274
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 85 $5,923 13,061 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 93 $10,003 15,055 SURFACE SEAL
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 81 $1,538 13,500 SURFACE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 79 $14,594 18,434 SURFACE SEAL
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 83 $11,279 13,302 SURFACE SEAL
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 87 $2,996 12,227 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 83 $21,269 17,632 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $67,602

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 78 $534 330,774 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 75 $253 324,248 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 75 $333 324,245 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 80 $139 344,334 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 82 $99 355,000 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,358
Year 2034 Area Total 313,300 Year 2034 Total $399,355
Total Section Area: 4,006,887 Grand Total $6,354,290
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 20
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Scenario 3A: Improve PCI to 75 by 2024 ($8.4 Million)

Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $200,000 5% 2016 $400,000 5% 2017 $450,000 5%
2018 $450,000 5% 2019 $500,000 5% 2020 $600,000 5%
2021 $600,000 5% 2022 $700,000 5% 2023 $500,000 5%
2024 $500,000 5% 2025 $400,000 5% 2026 $300,000 5%
2027 $410,000 5% 2028 $330,000 5% 2029 $420,000 5%
2030 $530,000 5% 2031 $450,000 5% 2032 $350,000 5%
2033 $590,000 5% 2034 $300,000 5%
Year: 2015
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$4,534 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $4,534
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$128,715 18,118 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $128,715
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$21,584 28,537 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR

WITH INLAYS
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $21,584
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 77 $6,080 18,175 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 71 $4,227 16,530 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 73 $2,330 17,020 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 73 $2,696 17,019 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 78 $2,184 18,856 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 74 $1,482 17,286 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 77 $7,022 18,184 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 1
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $26,021
NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
$4,984 5,833 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 63
Treatment Total $4,984
Year 2015 Area Total 111,883 Year 2015 Total $185,838
Year: 2016
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
$10,220 8,096 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $10,220
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
$130,326 16,932 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $130,326
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$175,700 13,627 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC

OVERLAY
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $175,700
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $2,331 13,567 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 70 $19,220 15,599 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 78 $13,794 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 71 $2,093 14,395 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 78 $4,505 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 78 $17,633 18,110 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $59,576
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 82 $2,811 32,304 SURFACE SEAL

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 82 $4,830 33,455 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 2
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2016
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 84 $686 32,824 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 85 $1,422 32,329 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 80 $2,034 33,815 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 86 $445 31,107 SURFACE SEAL
N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 84 $6,643 32,814 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 90 $1,470 25,410 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 88 $3,792 37,267 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $24,133
Year 2016 Area Total 271,005 Year 2016 Total $399,955
Year: 2017
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$16,170 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 100

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$47,040 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 100
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 RL AC $10,065 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 100

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$53,410 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 100

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$36,162 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 100
GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$25,226 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $188,073

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$145,463 16,210 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 100
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 3
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $145,463
EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $4,660 15,815 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $20,181 15,824 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $2,707 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 79 $17,052 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 78 $15,281 17,399 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $6,610 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 79 $22,509 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $89,000

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 85 $2,578 30,526 SURFACE SEAL
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 86 $2,686 29,146 SURFACE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 79 $4,228 32,319 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 90 $1,302 24,950 SURFACE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 85 $12,806 30,516 SURFACE SEAL SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 85 $2,770 30,529 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 93 $490 18,264 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $26,860
Year 2017 Area Total 301,140 Year 2017 Total $449,396
Year: 2018
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$64,349 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 100
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 4
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2018
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$49,269 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 100
HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$33,443 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 100
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$42,323 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 100
ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 RL AC $105,422 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 100
ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 RL AC $45,791 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 100
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
$21,959 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 100

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$15,435 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $377,991
NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $2,308 13,376 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,019 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,140 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $8,467

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 85 $19,912 29,259 SURFACE SEAL CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 93 $1,284 16,397 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 94 $4,583 29,301 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $25,779
PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$37,160 5,128 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 62
Treatment Total $37,160
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$58 1,333,
990
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$18 1,333,
990
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 5
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $76
Year 2018 Area Total 252,701 Year 2018 Total $449,473
Year: 2019
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,900 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 100
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
$119,088 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $142,988
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
$286,183 11,772 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC

OVERLAY
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $286,183
GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $2,833 14,566 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $3,278 14,565 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 71 $15,608 12,763 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 78 $1,801 14,805 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $5,187 9,693 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $28,707

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 87 $3,377 26,396 SURFACE SEAL
BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 92 $1,988 18,720 SURFACE SEAL LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 89 $7,813 28,773 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 85 $2,719 27,621 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 89 $10,231 30,457 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $26,128
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
$9,562 4,986 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 63
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 6
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2019
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
$6,017 4,850 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 61
Treatment Total $15,579
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
$59 1,270,
467
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 84 $36 808,039 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $95
Year 2019 Area Total 281,362 Year 2019 Total $499,680
Year: 2020
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$22,786 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 100
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$46,962 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 100
MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
MEADCR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$101,309 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
470 38 17,860 4/16/2015 100
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$91,144 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 100
NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET NICKST 100 RL AC/P CC
$39,270 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
301 23 6,923 4/9/2015 100
PROSPECT DRIVE RIDGE ROAD 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
PROSDR 100 RL AC $158,464 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
873 32 27,936 7/15/2015 100
SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET SPANST 100 RL AC/P CC
$30,631 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
270 20 5,400 4/9/2015 100
STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$17,035 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $507,601
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 72 $4,017 12,484 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 79 $16,388 12,646 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 7
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $20,405

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 91 $1,341 19,340 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 91 $2,482 19,311 SURFACE SEAL

SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SILKLN 100 245 25 8,857 4/16/2015 RL AC 91 $3,141 19,967 SURFACE SEAL URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 89 $6,025 23,420 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $12,989

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$27,026 4,583 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 59
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$8,883 4,498 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 58
Treatment Total $35,909

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$65 1,209,
968
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 76 $125 640,391 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 89 $98 643,512 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 76 $165 640,385 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$3 1,080,
554
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $456
Year 2020 Area Total 326,574 Year 2020 Total $577,360
Year: 2021
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$218,388 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 100
PROSPECT DRIVE 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
STERRA WEST CT PROSDR 200 RL AC $118,167 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
620 32 19,840 7/15/2015 100
SPANISH STREET HAYDEN STREET BADGER STREET SPANST 300 RL AC/P CC
$221,563 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,240 30 37,200 4/9/2015 100
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 8
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $558,118

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 91 $1,229 19,780 SURFACE SEAL
GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 80 $15,922 25,499 SURFACE SEAL HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 89 $7,398 20,810 SURFACE SEAL PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PEARST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 29 13,340 4/14/2015 90 $4,966 20,484 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $29,515
KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$11,793 4,590 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 63
Treatment Total $11,793
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 83 $174 711,281 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $54 711,281 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $228
Year 2021 Area Total 247,115 Year 2021 Total $599,654
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$258,382 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 100
RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$224,236 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $482,618
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 78 $8,556 13,120 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $3,124 10,100 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 72 $4,953 11,592 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 78 $4,428 11,804 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 78 $9,880 13,124 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 9
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,454 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $5,032 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $38,427
AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END AMAPDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
662 36 23,832 4/9/2015 89 $9,316 20,974 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
1,425 22 31,350 4/15/2015 89 $12,254 20,810 SURFACE SEAL GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 89 $20,582 26,025 SURFACE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 83 $14,425 24,642 SURFACE SEAL OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END OPALST 100 RL AC/P
CC
350 18 6,300 4/14/2015 89 $2,463 20,815 SURFACE SEAL
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 89 $6,328 26,025 SURFACE SEAL
RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE RUBYST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 21 9,660 4/14/2015 89 $3,776 20,815 SURFACE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT
CHANGE
HIGHWAY 49 VALLWY 200 RL AC/P
CC
427 38 16,226 4/16/2015 89 $6,343 20,806 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $75,487

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$62,823 4,215 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 59
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
$20,403 4,337 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 62
EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$16,928 4,297 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 61
Treatment Total $100,154
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 83 $176 677,411 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 81 $60 623,128 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 85 $87 723,157 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $323
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 10
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year 2022 Area Total 448,032 Year 2022 Total $697,009
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
$288,190 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 100
RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$123,516 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 100
WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,646 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $435,352
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 71 $8,570 10,966 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 79 $3,627 10,043 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 79 $8,858 10,044 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $21,055

BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BROAST 100 RL AC/P
CC
677 40 27,080 4/10/2015 88 $11,114 20,952 SURFACE SEAL

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 87 $419 20,913 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 90 $20,603 26,298 SURFACE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 79 $1,345 30,884 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 87 $5,336 27,756 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $38,817
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 89 $160 555,890 SEAL CRACKS

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 83 $196 645,153 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 73 $155 545,066 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 73 $205 545,108 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 11
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 83 $7 636,307 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $723
Year 2024 Area Total 362,281 Year 2024 Total $495,947
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
$58,172 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 100
DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$158,884 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 100

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$50,284 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 100
RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$62,178 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 100
SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
$45,506 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 100

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$33,882 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $408,906
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 78 $8,998 11,043 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $9,965 9,176 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $14,277 9,574 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 78 $5,461 11,022 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 78 $7,211 9,576 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 77 $6,620 7,635 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $52,532

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 81 $1,013 22,797 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 12
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 82 $2,101 22,687 SURFACE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 80 $9,998 29,126 SURFACE SEAL
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 87 $944 19,917 SURFACE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 79 $8,492 29,724 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 83 $657 22,376 SURFACE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 79 $2,773 29,724 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 79 $10,855 29,710 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 89 $690 23,978 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $37,523
Year 2024 Area Total 197,165 Year 2024 Total $498,961
Year: 2025
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$132,296 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 100
MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$90,610 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $222,906

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 78 $17,983 9,115 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $6,885 10,696 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $29,817 10,702 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 77 $3,247 9,490 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 13
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $57,932

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 88 $24,423 24,285 SURFACE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 79 $9,407 28,589 SURFACE SEAL
N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 80 $10,306 21,819 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 79 $13,857 27,677 SURFACE SEAL OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 86 $22,975 25,640 SURFACE SEAL SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 82 $4,092 21,534 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $85,060
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$11,338 3,623 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 63
Treatment Total $11,338
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 85 $171 630,298 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 85 $53 630,298 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 81 $153 547,251 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $377
Year 2025 Area Total 375,440 Year 2025 Total $377,613
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$66,955 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $66,955
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 72 $4,762 8,984 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,983 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $6,117 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 14
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $13,862
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 86 $1,568 18,773 SURFACE SEAL

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 86 $4,561 18,773 SURFACE SEAL
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 RL AC 86 $976 18,773 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 81 $3,999 20,687 SURFACE SEAL

BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT
CHANGE
BOWEDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
454 37 16,798 4/16/2015 84 $7,981 19,972 SURFACE SEAL
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 80 $4,167 19,982 SURFACE SEAL BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 90 $33,558 22,717 SURFACE SEAL

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 82 $29,418 20,560 SURFACE SEAL

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 86 $5,179 18,773 SURFACE SEAL
CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 88 $1,896 18,384 SURFACE SEAL

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 86 $3,507 18,773 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 94 $6,771 21,480 SURFACE SEAL
GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 86 $2,446 18,773 SURFACE SEAL

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 87 $5,943 18,065 SURFACE SEAL

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 87 $4,550 18,065 SURFACE SEAL
HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 87 $3,089 18,065 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 84 $2,395 20,188 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 85 $2,020 19,862 SURFACE SEAL
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 87 $2,028 18,065 SURFACE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 81 $19,867 20,685 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 15
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT
CHANGE
GOLDEN HILLS DR SUTTCE 200 RL AC/P
CC
785 37 29,045 4/16/2015 84 $13,800 19,974 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 87 $14,396 23,492 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $174,115

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$36,217 3,488 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 63
TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
$8,467 3,478 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 62
Treatment Total $44,684
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 86 $190 497,584 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 83 $57 551,378 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $247
Year 2026 Area Total 466,300 Year 2026 Total $299,863
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 RL AC $335,147 4,734 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $335,147

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 72 $15,211 8,684 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $4,185 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $4,842 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 79 $23,059 8,988 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 71 $3,556 8,672 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $50,853
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 16
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 84 $4,989 19,227 SURFACE SEAL
LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 88 $11,543 20,737 SURFACE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 79 $1,109 24,090 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 82 $4,016 19,514 SURFACE SEAL

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 86 $1,497 17,879 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $23,154

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 78 $164 464,750 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 85 $6 564,400 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $170
Year 2027 Area Total 155,673 Year 2027 Total $409,324
Year: 2028
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 RL AC $90,168 4,508 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $90,168
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 77 $4,187 7,539 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $53,769 7,546 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 78 $5,250 8,375 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $8,046 6,243 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $71,252
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 86 $2,318 17,028 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 17
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2028
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 84 $3,084 17,522 SURFACE SEAL

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 87 $1,980 17,219 SURFACE SEAL
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 86 $11,547 17,028 SURFACE SEAL FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 87 $2,105 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 87 $4,337 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 85 $4,309 17,504 SURFACE SEAL
MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
MEADCR 100 RL AC/P
CC
470 38 17,860 4/16/2015 87 $9,355 16,386 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 87 $3,667 17,214 SURFACE SEAL
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 87 $8,417 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 RL AC 85 $10,733 17,504 SURFACE SEAL ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 RL AC 85 $4,662 17,504 SURFACE SEAL

SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SILKLN 100 245 25 8,857 4/16/2015 RL AC 85 $4,640 17,281 SURFACE SEAL SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET SPANST 100 RL AC/P CC
270 20 5,400 4/9/2015 87 $2,829 16,386 SURFACE SEAL
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 85 $8,901 17,926 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $82,884

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$84,188 3,215 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 63
Treatment Total $84,188

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 84 $237 515,883 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 81 $305 473,566 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 18
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2028
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 76 $241 437,278 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 83 $257 491,178 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 81 $94 473,566 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,134
Year 2028 Area Total 456,667 Year 2028 Total $329,626
Year: 2029
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 72 $35,359 8,051 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 78 $16,771 8,138 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 79 $6,231 8,400 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 78 $3,921 8,132 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $62,282

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 87 $20,167 15,605 SURFACE SEAL

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 86 $1,815 16,594 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 87 $28,960 20,222 SURFACE SEAL HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 84 $10,930 16,707 SURFACE SEAL NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET NICKST 100 RL AC/P CC
301 23 6,923 4/9/2015 86 $3,808 16,217 SURFACE SEAL
PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PEARST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 29 13,340 4/14/2015 86 $7,337 16,700 SURFACE SEAL
PROSPECT DRIVE RIDGE ROAD 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
PROSDR 100 873 32 27,936 7/15/2015 RL AC 86 $15,365 16,217 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 19
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2029
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
PROSPECT DRIVE 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
STERRA WEST CT PROSDR 200 620 32 19,840 7/15/2015 RL AC 87 $10,912 15,605 SURFACE SEAL RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 87 $8,904 20,222 SURFACE SEAL
SPANISH STREET HAYDEN STREET BADGER STREET SPANST 300 RL AC/P CC
1,240 30 37,200 4/9/2015 87 $20,460 15,605 SURFACE SEAL STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 86 $1,652 16,217 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $130,310
EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$23,819 3,093 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 63
Treatment Total $23,819
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 86 $308 429,832 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 81 $312 394,558 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 80 $88 438,871 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 84 $145 484,779 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $853
Year 2029 Area Total 455,459 Year 2029 Total $217,264
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

SUTTER CREST EAST SUTTER CREST
WEST

PAVEMENT
CHANGE
SUTTCE 100 RL AC/P
CC
$417,080 4,089 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,220 37 45,140 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $417,080
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $13,354 6,832 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 72 $10,004 7,793 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $5,104 7,140 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 20
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $19,132 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 78 $9,663 7,141 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $12,464 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $3,626 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $7,435 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $80,782
OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END OPALST 100 RL AC/P
CC
350 18 6,300 4/14/2015 85 $3,639 16,184 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $3,639

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 75 $209 394,414 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 81 $11 428,458 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $220
Year 2030 Area Total 134,523 Year 2030 Total $501,721
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 78 $38,984 7,615 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 78 $13,272 8,423 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $4,352 7,104 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 78 $15,327 8,428 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $71,935
AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END AMAPDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
662 36 23,832 4/9/2015 84 $14,451 15,772 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 21
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 86 $25,053 14,709 SURFACE SEAL

BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BROAST 100 RL AC/P
CC
677 40 27,080 4/10/2015 84 $16,421 15,628 SURFACE SEAL
DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 87 $26,612 14,154 SURFACE SEAL

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 83 $619 15,448 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
1,425 22 31,350 4/15/2015 84 $19,010 15,753 SURFACE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 82 $14,067 20,607 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 85 $30,439 18,190 SURFACE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 79 $22,377 16,307 SURFACE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 80 $1,987 21,079 SURFACE SEAL
RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 87 $11,406 14,154 SURFACE SEAL
RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 86 $21,742 14,709 SURFACE SEAL
RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE RUBYST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 21 9,660 4/14/2015 84 $5,858 15,754 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 85 $7,883 19,851 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 87 $971 18,436 SURFACE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT
CHANGE
HIGHWAY 49 VALLWY 200 RL AC/P
CC
427 38 16,226 4/16/2015 84 $9,839 15,753 SURFACE SEAL
WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 87 $2,184 14,154 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $230,919

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 81 $386 400,801 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 22
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 74 $300 368,984 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 80 $388 396,617 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,074
Year 2031 Area Total 565,623 Year 2031 Total $303,928
Year: 2032
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 78 $13,294 7,454 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 77 $25,304 6,471 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 78 $11,030 7,389 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 78 $8,068 7,449 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $57,696
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 87 $5,372 13,480 SURFACE SEAL

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 79 $1,497 15,535 SURFACE SEAL

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 87 $34,365 17,956 SURFACE SEAL DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 87 $14,672 13,480 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 79 $3,104 15,534 SURFACE SEAL
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 83 $1,395 14,712 SURFACE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 80 $12,546 20,318 SURFACE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 87 $4,644 13,480 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 23
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2032
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 81 $971 15,473 SURFACE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 80 $4,097 20,318 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 81 $19,498 19,694 SURFACE SEAL OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 86 $32,328 18,379 SURFACE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 87 $5,742 13,480 SURFACE SEAL
SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 87 $4,203 13,480 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 80 $16,038 20,309 SURFACE SEAL

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 87 $3,129 13,480 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $163,601
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 81 $508 340,834 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 84 $289 420,011 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 84 $89 420,011 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 80 $231 380,572 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,117
Year 2032 Area Total 464,485 Year 2032 Total $222,414
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

VALLEY VIEW WAY END PAVEMENT
CHANGE
VALLWY 100 RL AC/P
CC
$433,684 3,532 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,067 38 40,546 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $433,684
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 24
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $5,343 5,917 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $14,070 5,912 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $10,172 7,233 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $44,053 7,238 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 77 $36,543 6,165 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 77 $10,269 4,915 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $120,450

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 80 $13,899 19,569 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 87 $20,256 17,194 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $34,155
Year 2033 Area Total 166,708 Year 2033 Total $588,289
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 79 $14,180 5,872 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $72,056 5,622 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 79 $70,443 5,872 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 78 $15,233 5,874 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,408 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $9,037 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $185,357
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 RL AC 82 $1,442 13,452 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 25
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 85 $49,580 15,713 SURFACE SEAL

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 79 $43,464 14,085 SURFACE SEAL CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 84 $2,801 13,586 SURFACE SEAL
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 93 $10,003 15,055 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 81 $3,538 14,005 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 82 $2,984 13,932 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $113,812

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 79 $214 336,714 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 81 $419 299,673 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 82 $99 355,000 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 83 $10 379,335 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $742
Year 2034 Area Total 360,163 Year 2034 Total $299,911
Total Section Area: 6,400,299 Grand Total $8,403,226
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75
by 2024
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 26
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Scenario 3B: Improve PCI to 75 by 2034 ($8.7 Million)

Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM Year Budget % PM
2015 $100,000 5% 2016 $200,000 5% 2017 $300,000 5%
2018 $300,000 5% 2019 $400,000 5% 2020 $400,000 5%
2021 $500,000 5% 2022 $500,000 5% 2023 $500,000 5%
2024 $500,000 5% 2025 $500,000 5% 2026 $500,000 5%
2027 $500,000 5% 2028 $600,000 5% 2029 $600,000 5%
2030 $600,000 5% 2031 $500,000 5% 2032 $600,000 5%
2033 $650,000 5% 2034 $600,000 5%
Year: 2015
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$4,534 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 100
GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$22,880 8,501 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $27,414
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$21,584 28,537 5% LOCALIZED REPAIR

WITH INLAYS
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $21,584
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 77 $6,080 18,175 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 71 $4,227 16,530 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 71 $18,305 16,535 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 73 $2,330 17,020 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 73 $2,696 17,019 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 78 $2,184 18,856 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 74 $1,482 17,286 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 77 $7,022 18,184 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $44,326
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 1
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year 2015 Area Total 88,842 Year 2015 Total $93,324
Year: 2016
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
$10,220 8,096 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $10,220
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$135,151 17,587 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $135,151
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $2,331 13,567 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 78 $13,794 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 78 $4,505 18,117 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 78 $17,633 18,110 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $38,263

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 82 $4,830 33,455 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 80 $2,034 33,815 SURFACE SEAL
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 86 $445 31,107 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 88 $3,792 37,267 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $11,101
NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
$5,233 5,522 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 61
Treatment Total $5,233
Year 2016 Area Total 150,552 Year 2016 Total $199,968
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 2
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2017
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$16,170 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 100
BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 RL AC $10,065 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 100
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
$20,914 7,711 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $47,149
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
$136,842 16,481 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $136,842
EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $4,660 15,815 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $20,181 15,820 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $2,707 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 79 $17,052 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 78 $15,281 17,399 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $6,610 13,468 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 70 $2,198 13,646 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 79 $22,509 17,035 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $91,198
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 81 $2,951 30,948 SURFACE SEAL

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 83 $720 31,723 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 84 $1,493 31,395 SURFACE SEAL
HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 79 $4,228 32,319 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 3
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2017
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 83 $6,976 31,716 SURFACE SEAL
SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 85 $2,770 30,529 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $19,138
TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
$5,458 5,414 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 63
Treatment Total $5,458
Year 2017 Area Total 249,925 Year 2017 Total $299,785
Year: 2018
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$49,392 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 100

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$56,081 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 100

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$15,435 7,343 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $120,908

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$152,736 15,769 1.5" AC OVERLAY
W/FABRIC AND 10%

DIGOUTS
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $152,736
NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $2,308 13,396 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,019 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,140 11,438 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 72 $2,293 13,480 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $10,760

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 84 $2,707 29,712 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 4
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2018
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 94 $4,583 29,301 SURFACE SEAL
LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 90 $7,441 28,839 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 92 $515 22,912 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $15,246
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$18 1,333,
990
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $18
Year 2018 Area Total 155,008 Year 2018 Total $299,668
Year: 2019
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,900 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 100

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$39,869 6,994 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $63,769
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
$286,183 11,772 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC

OVERLAY
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $286,183
GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $2,833 14,566 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $3,278 14,565 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 78 $1,801 14,805 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $5,187 9,693 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $13,099

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 83 $14,119 28,726 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 5
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2019
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 85 $2,719 27,621 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 89 $10,231 30,457 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $27,069
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
$9,562 4,986 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 63
Treatment Total $9,562
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$61 1,270,
467
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 84 $36 808,039 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $97
Year 2019 Area Total 249,139 Year 2019 Total $399,779
Year: 2020
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
$125,042 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 100
FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$22,786 6,661 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $147,828
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$213,565 11,211 6" FDR WITH 1.5" AC

OVERLAY
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $213,565
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 72 $4,017 12,484 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 78 $2,528 12,631 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $6,545
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$8,883 4,498 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 58
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 6
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $8,883
Year 2020 Area Total 88,127 Year 2020 Total $376,821
Year: 2021
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
$218,388 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 100

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$74,492 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 100

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
$57,035 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 100
HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$38,714 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 100
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$49,310 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 100
SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET SPANST 100 RL AC/P CC
$32,163 6,344 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
270 20 5,400 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $470,102
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 80 $3,265 25,499 SURFACE SEAL

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 81 $23,050 26,385 SURFACE SEAL PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 85 $1,877 25,391 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $28,192

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
$69 1,152,
351
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 87 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 74 $138 599,704 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 74 $182 599,753 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 86 $112 842,128 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $54 711,281 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 86 $3 924,367 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 7
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $558
Year 2021 Area Total 331,020 Year 2021 Total $498,852
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
$258,382 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 100
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$51,444 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 100
MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
MEADCR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$111,693 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
470 38 17,860 4/16/2015 100
STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$18,781 6,041 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $440,300
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 78 $8,556 13,120 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $3,124 10,100 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 78 $4,428 11,804 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 78 $9,880 13,124 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,454 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $5,032 8,499 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $33,474

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 83 $3,909 24,646 SURFACE SEAL
HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 83 $14,425 24,642 SURFACE SEAL RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 89 $6,328 26,025 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $24,662
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 83 $182 677,411 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 81 $60 623,128 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 8
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2022
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 85 $87 723,157 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $329
Year 2023 Area Total 265,135 Year 2023 Total $498,765
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
$288,190 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 100
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$105,511 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 100
WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
$23,646 5,754 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $417,347
GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 77 $42,130 9,621 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 79 $3,627 10,043 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 79 $8,858 10,044 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $54,615
BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 87 $2,416 21,277 SURFACE SEAL CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 88 $1,638 21,246 SURFACE SEAL
HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 87 $8,156 21,195 SURFACE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 79 $1,345 30,884 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 83 $1,745 23,590 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 87 $5,336 27,756 SURFACE SEAL
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 85 $6,974 22,811 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $27,610
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 9
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2023
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 89 $160 555,890 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $160
Year 2024 Area Total 256,904 Year 2024 Total $499,732
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
$58,172 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 100
DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$158,884 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 100

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$50,284 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 100
NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET NICKST 100 RL AC/P CC
$47,733 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
301 23 6,923 4/9/2015 100
ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 RL AC $61,364 5,480 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 100
Treatment Total $376,437
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $9,965 9,182 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 78 $23,993 12,104 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $14,277 9,574 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 78 $7,211 9,576 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 78 $31,672 12,104 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 77 $6,620 7,635 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $93,738

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 80 $7,137 22,934 SURFACE SEAL

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 79 $8,492 29,724 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 10
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2024
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 79 $2,773 29,724 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 79 $10,855 29,710 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $29,257

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 83 $206 614,431 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 89 $120 529,419 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 83 $7 597,378 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $333
Year 2024 Area Total 318,896 Year 2024 Total $499,765
Year: 2025
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$132,296 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 100
MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$90,610 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 100
ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 RL AC $148,339 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 100
SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
$47,781 5,219 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $419,026
EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $6,885 10,696 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $29,817 10,699 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 78 $3,247 9,504 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $39,949
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 11
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2025
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$14,335 3,651 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 58
Treatment Total $14,335
Year 2026 Area Total 99,947 Year 2026 Total $473,310
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$66,955 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 100
JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 RL AC $319,188 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 100

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
$37,354 4,970 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $423,497

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 78 $23,706 11,220 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $2,983 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $6,117 6,992 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $32,806

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 79 $1,117 20,814 SURFACE SEAL

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 85 $1,568 19,867 SURFACE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 80 $2,317 20,804 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 85 $25,017 25,358 SURFACE SEAL MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 81 $725 20,718 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 87 $761 23,727 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $31,505
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 12
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2026
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
$11,904 3,434 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 62
Treatment Total $11,904
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $70 552,285 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 83 $57 551,378 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $127
Year 2026 Area Total 184,151 Year 2026 Total $499,839
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
PATRICA LANE 155 PATRICA LANE HIGHWAY 49 PATRLN 200 RL AC/P CC
$386,405 4,734 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,862 26 48,412 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $386,405
GREENSTONE TERRACE FRAKE ST CHURCH STREET GREETR 200 RL AC/P CC
233 15 3,495 4/15/2015 78 $4,185 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL LEIBY AVENUE WORLEY OLD HIGHWAY 49 LEIBAV 100 RL AC/P
CC
337 12 4,044 4/14/2015 78 $4,842 9,867 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 77 $27,269 8,260 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 71 $5,000 8,512 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 78 $3,556 8,978 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $44,852

FLUME ROAD GREENSTONE

TERRACE
END FLUMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
85 12 1,020 4/15/2015 82 $509 18,923 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 90 $25,043 21,635 SURFACE SEAL LELA COURT OLD SUTIER HILL 75 LELA CPURT LELACT 100 RL AC/P CC
146 15 2,190 4/16/2015 83 $1,093 18,717 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 13
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 84 $25,330 24,606 SURFACE SEAL RANDOLPH STREET BOSTON ALLEY MAIN STREET RANDST 300 RL AC/P CC
101 22 2,222 4/10/2015 79 $1,109 24,090 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 84 $15,116 24,350 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $68,200

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 76 $178 455,549 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 76 $234 455,544 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $412
Year 2027 Area Total 276,404 Year 2027 Total $499,869
Year: 2028
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BARBARA CT JUDY DR END BARBCT 100 RL AC $90,168 4,508 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
284 25 10,759 4/15/2015 100
PROSPECT DRIVE RIDGE ROAD 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
PROSDR 100 RL AC $234,123 4,508 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
873 32 27,936 7/15/2015 100
RANDOLPH STREET END BOARD ST RANDST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$75,577 4,508 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
501 18 9,018 4/10/2015 100
Treatment Total $399,868
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 77 $4,187 7,539 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $11,024 7,546 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $53,769 7,553 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL OAK COURT MAHONEY ROAD END OAKCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
145 20 4,176 4/9/2015 78 $5,250 8,385 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL SIERRA COURT CALIFORNIA DRIVE END SIERCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
176 37 9,042 4/9/2015 78 $11,367 7,871 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 78 $8,046 6,243 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 14
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Treatment Total $93,643
AMAPOLA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END AMAPDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
662 36 23,832 4/9/2015 82 $12,483 18,689 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY EUREKA STREET RANDOLPH
STREET
BOSTAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
443 19 8,417 4/10/2015 79 $4,409 18,880 SURFACE SEAL
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 87 $36,997 21,271 SURFACE SEAL

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 85 $28,272 23,000 SURFACE SEAL FOOTHILL DRIVE 284 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
FOOTDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
375 38 14,250 4/15/2015 93 $7,465 21,496 SURFACE SEAL
LORINDA DRIVE HWY 49 HIGHLAND DR LORIDR 100 RL AC/A
C
1,006 23 23,138 4/15/2015 86 $12,120 20,320 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL

SUTTER - JONE
ROAD
SPANST 500 RL AC/P
CC
230 35 8,050 4/9/2015 81 $4,217 18,752 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $105,963
Year 2028 Area Total 324,497 Year 2028 Total $599,474
Year: 2029
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

COLE STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
PLAZA STREET COLEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$111,801 4,294 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
847 15 12,705 4/10/2015 100
PATRICA LANE END 155 PATRICA
LANE
PATRLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
$169,483 4,294 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
535 36 19,260 4/15/2015 100
PROSPECT DRIVE 30 PROSPECT
DRIVE
STERRA WEST CT PROSDR 200 RL AC $174,586 4,294 RECONSTRUCTION (2"AC+4"AB)
620 32 19,840 7/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $455,870
KEYES STREET SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYEST 100 RL AC/P CC
295 16 4,720 4/8/2015 79 $6,231 8,400 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

RIDGECREST COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END RIDGCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,142 34 41,815 4/16/2015 78 $55,194 7,498 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

SILKSWORTH LN SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SILKLN 100 245 25 8,857 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $11,691 7,196 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $73,116

CALIFORNIA DRIVE SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
END CALIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,720 36 61,920 4/9/2015 79 $34,055 17,982 SURFACE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 15
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2029
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

EL CORADO COURT CALIFORNIA
DRIVE
END ELCOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
105 36 3,780 4/9/2015 81 $2,079 17,916 SURFACE SEAL
GOLD DUST TRAIL 30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
CHURCH STREET GOLDTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
286 18 5,148 4/15/2015 79 $2,832 17,271 SURFACE SEAL

MOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE
(SUTTER CRE
FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE MOUNDRS 100 RL AC/P
CC
280 25 7,000 4/14/2015 81 $3,850 17,914 SURFACE SEAL
OPAL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE END OPALST 100 RL AC/P
CC
350 18 6,300 4/14/2015 81 $3,465 17,914 SURFACE SEAL
PEARL STREET HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PEARST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 29 13,340 4/14/2015 80 $7,337 17,925 SURFACE SEAL
PLEASANT DRIVE HIGHLAND DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE PLEADR 100 RL AC/P CC
252 20 5,040 4/14/2015 82 $2,772 17,793 SURFACE SEAL
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 86 $8,904 21,188 SURFACE SEAL
RUBY STREET FOOTHILL DRIVE LORINDA DRIVE RUBYST 100 RL AC/P CC
460 21 9,660 4/14/2015 81 $5,313 17,914 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $70,607
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 82 $315 452,693 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 80 $88 438,871 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 83 $8 480,813 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $411
Year 2029 Area Total 302,829 Year 2029 Total $600,004
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
RABB STREET HANFORD STREET END RABBST 100 RL AC/P
CC
$173,799 4,089 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
855 22 18,810 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $173,799
ANNA AVENUE ELM ST 52 ANNA AVE ANNAAV 100 205 47 9,635 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $13,354 6,835 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

GOLD DUST TRAIL END OF

PAVEMENT
30 GOLD DUST
TRAIL
GOLDTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
263 14 3,682 4/15/2015 78 $5,104 7,140 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 16
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
HIGHLAND DRIVE HIGHWAY 49
NORTH
RUBY ST HIGHDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
493 28 13,804 4/14/2015 78 $19,132 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL MAHONEY MILL ROAD 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHONEY RD MAHMRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
581 12 6,972 4/9/2015 78 $9,663 7,141 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

NICKERSON STREET ELM STREET WOODWORTH
AVE
NICKST 200 RL AC/P
CC
391 23 8,993 4/9/2015 78 $12,464 7,139 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $3,626 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $7,435 5,753 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $70,778
ALLEN ROAD BADGER ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ALLERD 100 RL AC/P
CC
316 14 4,424 4/9/2015 83 $2,555 16,168 SURFACE SEAL
AMADOR TRAIL SPANISH STREET 285' FROM

SPANISH
AMADTR 100 RL AC/P
CC
285 32 9,120 4/9/2015 79 $5,267 21,437 SURFACE SEAL
AMADOR TRAIL 285' FROM

SPANISH
END AMADTR 200 RL AC/P
CC
275 12 3,300 4/9/2015 80 $1,906 16,434 SURFACE SEAL

AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
AMELST 100 RL AC/P
CC
480 20 9,600 4/9/2015 82 $5,544 16,347 SURFACE SEAL

BADGER ROAD SPANISH STREET ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
BADGRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,878 22 41,316 4/9/2015 87 $23,860 14,862 SURFACE SEAL BORGH WAY EUREKA ST BROADWAY BORGWY 100 158 13 2,054 4/14/2015 RL AC 80 $1,187 16,434 SURFACE SEAL

BOSTON ALLEY RANDOLPH
STREET

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BOSTAL 200 RL AC/P
CC
400 25 10,000 4/10/2015 81 $5,775 17,053 SURFACE SEAL

BOWERS DRIVE RIDGE ROAD PAVEMENT
CHANGE
BOWEDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
454 37 16,798 4/16/2015 79 $9,701 17,125 SURFACE SEAL

BOWERS DRIVE PAVEMENT
CHANGE

VALLEY VIEW
WAY
BOWEDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
991 37 36,667 4/16/2015 86 $21,175 15,445 SURFACE SEAL

BROAD STREET EUREKA STREET GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
BROAST 100 RL AC/P
CC
677 40 27,080 4/10/2015 79 $15,639 17,126 SURFACE SEAL

COLUMBIA STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
RABB STREET COLUST 100 RL AC/P
CC
545 20 10,900 4/9/2015 82 $6,295 16,347 SURFACE SEAL

ELM STREET BADGER ROAD NICKERSON
STREET
ELM ST 100 RL AC/P
CC
410 18 7,380 4/9/2015 83 $4,262 16,168 SURFACE SEAL
EUREKA STREET END OF ONE LANE BORGHWAY EUREST 100 RL AC/P CC
2,004 11 22,044 4/10/2015 85 $12,730 15,876 SURFACE SEAL FIFIELD MAIN STREET SPANISH STREET FIFIEL 100 RL AC/P
CC
309 13 4,017 4/9/2015 85 $2,320 15,876 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 17
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
FOOTHILL DRIVE 258 FOOTHILL
DRIVE
PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTDR 200 RL AC/P
CC
1,425 22 31,350 4/15/2015 79 $18,104 17,128 SURFACE SEAL

GREENSTONE TERRACE TELEPHONE POLL
49 FRAKE ST GREETR 100 RL AC/P
CC
1,137 11 12,507 4/15/2015 86 $7,223 15,445 SURFACE SEAL

HAYDEN ALLEY SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
HAYDAL 100 RL AC/P
CC
532 18 9,576 4/9/2015 86 $5,530 15,445 SURFACE SEAL
HIGHLAND DRIVE RUBY ST LORINDA DRIVE HIGHDR 200 RL AC/P CC
1,318 28 36,904 4/14/2015 81 $21,312 17,052 SURFACE SEAL HIGHGRADE LORINDA DRIVE END HIGHGR 100 RL AC/P
CC
650 10 6,500 4/14/2015 86 $3,754 15,445 SURFACE SEAL
MAHONEY MILL ROAD SPANISHSTREET 190 MAHONEY

MILL RD
MAHMRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
487 17 8,279 4/9/2015 86 $4,781 15,445 SURFACE SEAL
MARRE MILL STREET END MARRST 100 RL AC/P
CC
457 18 8,226 4/10/2015 87 $4,751 14,862 SURFACE SEAL
MEADOW CREST SUTTER CREST W. GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
MEADCR 100 RL AC/P
CC
470 38 17,860 4/16/2015 87 $10,314 14,862 SURFACE SEAL
RANDOLPH STREET BOARD ST BOSTON ALLEY RANDST 200 RL AC/P CC
194 22 4,268 4/10/2015 80 $2,465 16,434 SURFACE SEAL
SPANISH STREET MAIN STREET KEYS STREET SPANST 100 RL AC/P CC
270 20 5,400 4/9/2015 86 $3,119 15,445 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 86 $7,508 20,063 SURFACE SEAL
STANFORD MillSTREET END STANFO 100 RL AC/P
CC
231 13 3,003 4/10/2015 87 $1,735 14,862 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER CREST EAST PAVEMENT
CHANGE
GOLDEN HILLS DR SUTTCE 200 RL AC/P
CC
785 37 29,045 4/16/2015 79 $16,773 17,126 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END SUTTCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
226 33 10,532 4/16/2015 79 $6,083 21,449 SURFACE SEAL

VALLEY VIEW WAY PAVEMENT
CHANGE
HIGHWAY 49 VALLWY 200 RL AC/P
CC
427 38 16,226 4/16/2015 79 $9,371 17,128 SURFACE SEAL

WERNER ROAD GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
GATE WERNRD 100 RL AC/P
CC
120 25 3,000 4/10/2015 82 $1,733 16,347 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $242,772

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 73 $219 384,472 SEAL CRACKS
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 86 $230 409,364 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 18
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2030
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 73 $289 384,498 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 81 $344 421,286 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 81 $197 427,960 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,279
Year 2030 Area Total 675,351 Year 2030 Total $488,628
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

ACADAMY DRIVE BOWERS DRIVE INDEPENDENCE
DRIVE
ACADDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$259,889 3,894 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
724 37 26,788 4/16/2015 100
Treatment Total $259,889

BADGER ROAD ALLEN RANCH
ROAD
MAIN STREET BADGRD 200 RL AC/P
CC
720 23 16,560 4/9/2015 78 $24,099 6,798 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $24,099
BRYSON CT BRYSON DR END BRYSCT 100 327 18 5,886 4/15/2015 RL AC 82 $3,569 15,477 SURFACE SEAL CONNIE LANE FOOTHILL DRIVE END CONNLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
190 21 3,990 4/14/2015 84 $2,420 15,715 SURFACE SEAL
DENNIS HIGHWAY 49 NICKERSON
STREET
DENNIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
2,743 16 43,888 4/14/2015 87 $26,612 14,154 SURFACE SEAL

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 80 $14,067 20,713 SURFACE SEAL
HERRINGTON HILL DRIVE GOLDEN HILLS DR END HERRDR 100 715 24 19,872 4/16/2015 RL AC 82 $12,050 15,466 SURFACE SEAL MAHONEY ROAD ORO MADRE END MAHORD 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 12 3,276 4/9/2015 80 $1,987 21,079 SURFACE SEAL
N. AMELIA STREET SPANISH STREET HANFORD
STREET
NAMEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
412 39 16,068 4/9/2015 87 $9,743 14,154 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 80 $18,569 20,713 SURFACE SEAL PLEASANT DRIVE FOOTHILL DRIVE HIGHWAY 49 PLEADR 200 RL AC/P CC
327 13 4,251 4/14/2015 80 $2,578 16,264 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 19
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2031
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
URSULA DRIVE CALIFORNIA DRIVE END URSUDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
472 36 16,992 4/9/2015 82 $10,304 16,078 SURFACE SEAL
WORLEY DENNIS MAIN STREET WORLEY 100 RL AC/P
CC
277 13 3,601 4/14/2015 87 $2,184 14,154 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $104,083
KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$19,210 2,808 CHIP SEAL WITH 15%

DIGOUTS
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 62
Treatment Total $19,210
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 83 $446 365,124 SEAL CRACKS

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 82 $356 410,606 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $802
Year 2031 Area Total 344,883 Year 2031 Total $408,083
Year: 2032
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
EUREKA STREET BORGHWAY BROAD STREET EUREST 200 RL AC/P
CC
$73,528 3,709 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
401 18 7,218 4/10/2015 100
RAYLAN DRIVE PATRICIA HIGHWAY 49 RAYLDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
$365,257 3,709 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
996 36 35,856 4/15/2015 100
Treatment Total $438,785
KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 71 $8,068 7,084 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL NICKERSON STREET WOODWORTH AVE BARNEY LN NICKST 300 RL AC/P CC
130 23 2,990 4/9/2015 77 $4,569 6,743 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $12,637
BROADWAY BROAD STREET END BROAWY 800 RL AC/P
CC
649 13 8,437 4/10/2015 87 $5,372 13,480 SURFACE SEAL
DAVID DRIVE RAYLAN DRIVE END DAVIDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
823 28 23,044 4/15/2015 87 $14,672 13,480 SURFACE SEAL
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 20
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2032
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

MANOR COURT GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
END MANOCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
504 33 19,705 4/16/2015 80 $12,546 20,318 SURFACE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

BERNARDIS
STREET
PRIVATE GATE MILLST 200 RL AC/P
CC
429 17 7,293 4/10/2015 87 $4,644 13,480 SURFACE SEAL
NICKERSON STREET MAIN STREET ELM STREET NICKST 100 RL AC/P CC
301 23 6,923 4/9/2015 87 $4,408 13,480 SURFACE SEAL

OAK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END OAKVCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
195 33 6,435 4/16/2015 80 $4,097 20,318 SURFACE SEAL
ORO MADRE WAY 171 ORO MADRE
WAY

MAHONEY MILL
RD
OROMWY 200 445 20 8,900 4/14/2015 RL AC 87 $5,667 13,480 SURFACE SEAL

SPANISH STREET BADGER STREET NEW HIGH
SCHOOL
SPANST 400 RL AC/P
CC
1,145 22 25,190 4/9/2015 80 $16,038 20,309 SURFACE SEAL Treatment Total $67,444
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 79 $449 370,514 SEAL CRACKS
RIDGE ROAD END 3 LANE

SECTION
E.CITY LIMITS RIDGRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
426 38 16,188 4/16/2015 83 $101 402,423 SEAL CRACKS

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 80 $13 379,883 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $563
Year 2032 Area Total 227,715 Year 2032 Total $519,429
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
AMADOR ROAD HANFORD STREET CITY LIMIT AMADRD 100 RL AC/P CC
$93,056 3,532 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
435 20 8,700 4/8/2015 100
SPANISH STREET HAYDEN STREET BADGER STREET SPANST 300 RL AC/P CC
$397,895 3,532 RECONSTRUCTION
(2"AC+4"AB)
1,240 30 37,200 4/9/2015 100
Treatment Total $490,951
ANNA AVENUE 52 ANNA AVE WOODWORTH
AVE
ANNAAV 200 222 15 3,330 4/14/2015 RL AC 78 $5,343 5,917 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

CHINA GULCH ROAD HANFORD STREET END CHINGUR
D
100 RL AC/P
CC
235 10 2,350 4/9/2015 78 $3,771 6,173 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 21
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2033
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
EUREKA STREET BROAD STREET MAIN STREE EUREST 300 RL AC/P CC
317 20 6,340 4/10/2015 78 $10,172 7,233 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL

FRAKES GREENSTONE

TERRACE
130 FRAKES FRAKES 100 RL AC/P
CC
325 15 4,875 4/15/2015 78 $7,822 6,167 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLD STRIKE COURT BRYSON DRIVE END GOLDSCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
737 34 27,457 4/15/2015 78 $44,053 7,236 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL N. VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
EAST
END NVIEST 100 RL AC/P
CC
579 34 22,776 4/16/2015 78 $36,543 6,174 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL VISTA CT FOOTHILL DR END VISTCT 100 RL AC/A
C
161 37 6,400 5/15/2015 77 $10,269 4,915 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $117,973
GOPHER FLAT ROAD MILLS ST 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOPHRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,194 24 52,656 4/14/2015 85 $35,201 17,927 SURFACE SEAL

SUTTER - IONE ROAD SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD
SUTTRD 200 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
100 16 1,600 4/9/2015 86 $1,070 17,255 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $36,271
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 81 $379 324,604 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 78 $474 349,724 SEAL CRACKS

SPANISH STREET SUTTER - IONE
ROAD

HANFORD
STREET
SPANST 600 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
260 50 13,000 4/9/2015 83 $84 385,329 SEAL CRACKS
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 78 $276 352,491 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,213
Year 2033 Area Total 317,960 Year 2033 Total $646,408
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
BROADMEADOW CT GOLDEN HILLS DR END BROADCT 100 237 37 8,769 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $14,773 5,622 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL GOLDEN HILLS DRIVE SHAKE RIDGE RD HERRINGTON CT GOLDDR 100 1,156 37 42,772 4/16/2015 RL AC 78 $72,056 5,623 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL KARSAN DRIVE BADGER ROAD END KARSDR 100 RL AC/P
CC
330 16 5,280 4/9/2015 78 $8,895 6,755 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 22
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected
MINESHAFT COURT MILL STREET END MINESCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
127 12 1,524 4/10/2015 78 $2,568 5,875 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD HANFORD STREET POLE 72 TUCKRD 100 218 12 2,616 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $4,408 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD POLE72 P.O. DRIVEWAY TUCKRD 200 596 9 5,364 4/10/2015 RL ST 100 $9,037 4,733 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL TUCKER ROAD P.O. DRIVEWAY GOPHER FLAT
ROAD
TUCKRD 300 RL AC/P
CC
135 22 2,970 4/10/2015 78 $5,004 6,382 CHIP OR CAPE SEAL Treatment Total $116,741

CREEK VIEW COURT SUTTER CREST
WEST
END CREECT 100 RL AC/P
CC
498 30 18,274 4/16/2015 86 $12,828 12,706 SURFACE SEAL

DEL VISTA EL TERRADO SUTTER

TERRACE

COMMUNITY
DELVIS 100 RL AC/P
CC
150 22 3,300 7/15/2015 82 $2,317 13,933 SURFACE SEAL
GOPHER FLAT ROAD 248 GOPHER FLAT
RD
GOLDEN HILLS RD GOPHRD 300 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
1,255 40 50,200 4/14/2015 87 $35,237 15,869 SURFACE SEAL JEAN COURT JUDY DRIVE END JEANCT 100 RL AC/P
CC
206 25 8,808 4/15/2015 87 $6,183 12,227 SURFACE SEAL
JUDY DRIVE PATRICA LN PATRICA LN JUDYDR 100 1,615 26 41,990 4/15/2015 RL AC 87 $29,475 12,227 SURFACE SEAL MARK LANE RAYLAN DRIVE END MARKLN 100 RL AC/P
CC
447 28 12,516 4/15/2015 86 $8,786 12,706 SURFACE SEAL

MILL STREET (SUTTER
CREEK)

GOPHER FLAT
ROAD

BERNARDIS
STREET
MILLST 100 RL AC/P
CC
630 33 20,790 4/10/2015 79 $14,594 18,434 SURFACE SEAL
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD EUREKA ROAD MAIN STREET OLDSRD 200 RMi C
AC/P
CC
2,308 22 50,776 4/15/2015 84 $35,642 17,308 SURFACE SEAL ORO MADRE WAY SUTTER IRON RD 171 ORO MADRE
WAY
OROMWY 100 683 30 20,490 4/14/2015 RL AC 86 $14,383 12,706 SURFACE SEAL SPANISH STREET KEYS STREET HAYDEN STREET SPANST 200 RL AC/P CC
300 22 6,600 4/9/2015 86 $4,633 12,706 SURFACE SEAL
SUTTER - IONE ROAD CITY LIMIT SPANISH STREET SUTTRD 100 RMa C
AC/P
CC
1,010 30 30,300 4/9/2015 85 $21,269 17,172 SURFACE SEAL

WOODWORTH NICKERSON
STREET
END WOODWO 100 RL AC/P
CC
273 18 4,914 4/9/2015 87 $3,450 12,227 SURFACE SEAL
Treatment Total $188,797
BRYSON DRIVE S.R. 49 OLD SUTIER HILL BRYSDR 100 RMi
C
AC/P
CC
1,909 37 70,633 4/15/2015 78 $683 276,876 SEAL CRACKS
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 23
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver
Year: 2034
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section FC Surf
Length Width Area Type PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Last
Inspected

CHURCH STREET MAIN STREET CITY

LIMIT/PAVEMENT
CHANGE
CHURST 500 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
2,159 25 53,975 4/15/2015 79 $508 336,067 SEAL CRACKS

GOPHER FLAT ROAD OLD CALIFORNIA
49 MILLS ST GOPHRD 100 RMa
C
AC/P
CC
627 37 23,199 4/14/2015 77 $233 329,494 SEAL CRACKS
OLD SUTTER HILL ROAD RIDGE ROAD EUREKA ROAD OLDSRD 100 RMi C
AC/P
CC
1,392 22 30,624 4/15/2015 77 $307 329,494 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,731
Year 2034 Area Total 516,684 Year 2034 Total $307,269
Total Section Area: 5,423,969 Grand Total $8,708,772
Interest: 5.00%
Amador Multi-City Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 08/11/2015
Scenario: SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75
by 2034
Scenarios Criteria: Area ID = SUT - Sutter Creek City
** - Treatment from Project Selection 24
SS1026
MTC StreetSaver

APPENDIX E

PCI Maps

Current Pavement Network Conditions

Current PCI Condition
Printed: 8/10/2015
Amador Multi-City
Test
Feature Legend
I - Very Good
II - Good (non-load)
III - Good (load-related)
IV - Poor
V - Very Poor
0 0.5 1
Miles

Pavement Network Condition Projections

Scenario 1: Unconstrained Budget ($8.4 Million)

Scenario PCI Condition
SUT Scenario 1 - Unconstrained Budget - 2034 Project Period - Total Rehab: $219,136 - Printed: 8/11/2015 Amador Multi-City
Test
Feature Legend
I - Very Good
0 0.5 1
Miles

Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 59 ($6.4 Million)

Scenario PCI Condition
SUT Scenario 2 - MAintain PCI at 59 - 2034 Project Period - Total Rehab: $330,395 - Printed: 8/11/2015 Amador Multi-City
Test
Feature Legend
I - Very Good
V - Very Poor
0 0.5 1
Miles

Scenario 3A: Improve PCI to 75 by 2024 ($8.4 Million)

Scenario PCI Condition
SUT Scenario 3A - Improve PCI to 75 by 2024 - 2034 Project Period - Total Rehab: $185,357 - Printed: 8/11/2015 Amador Multi-City
Test
Feature Legend
I - Very Good
V - Very Poor
0 0.5 1
Miles

Scenario 3B: Improve PCI to 75 by 2034 ($8.7 Million)

Scenario PCI Condition
SUT Scenario 3B - Improve PCI to 75 by 2034 - 2034 Project Period - Total Rehab: $116,741 - Printed: 8/11/2015 Amador Multi-City
Test
Feature Legend
I - Very Good
V - Very Poor
0 0.5 1
Miles

TO: Tom DuBois, City Manager
FROM: James O’Connell, Chief of Police

DATE: November 20, 2023

DEPARTMENT INFORMATION
October 2023
Monthly Statistics
Calls for Service 105
Traffic Stops 71
Officer Initiated Incidents 303
Business Checks 159
Vehicle/Pedestrian Checks 40
Total Officer Reports 36
Arrests 10
Other Officer Initiated Incidents 232
Moving Citations 11
Parking Citations 3
Total 970
Downtown Foot Patrol:

During the month of October, SCPD continued to conduct daily foot patrol in the downtown area and average over 30 minutes, per officer each day.

Volunteer Service:

In addition, our dedicated Volunteers contributed over 17 hours of service, including citation and records processing, and responding to requests for collision reports.

Page 1 of 3 ends
← All documents from this meeting