E-1
"EMMA" or "Electronic Municipal Market Access" means the centralized on-line repository for documents to be filed with the MSRB, such as official statements and disclosure information relating to municipal bonds, notes and other securities as issued by state and local governments.
"Listed Events" means any of the events listed in Section 5(a) of this Disclosure Agreement.
"MSRB" means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, which has been designated by the Securities and Exchange Commission as the sole repository of disclosure information for purposes of the Rule, or any other repository of disclosure information which may be designated by the Securities and Exchange Commission as such for purposes of the Rule in the future.
"Official Statement" means the Official Statement, dated May J 2022, relating to the Bonds.
"Participating Underwriter" means Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, the original underwriter of the Bonds required to comply with the Rule in connection with offering of the Bonds.
"Rule" means Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time.
Section 2. Purpose of the Disclosure Agreement. This Disclosure Agreement is being executed and delivered by the Authority and the Dissemination Agent for the benefit of the owners and Beneficial Owners of the Bonds and in order to assist the Participating Underwriter in complying with the Rule.
Section 3. Provision of Annual Reports.
(a) Delivery of Annual Report. The Authority shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to, not later than the March 1 occurring after the end of each fiscal year of the Authority, commencing with the report for the 2021-22 fiscal year, which is due not later than March 1, 2023, file with EMMA, in a readable PDF or other electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, an Annual Report that is consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure Agreement. The Annual Report may be submitted as a single document or as separate documents comprising a package and may cross-reference other information as provided in Section 4 of this Disclosure Agreement; provided that any audited financial statements of the Authority may be submitted separately from the balance of the Annual Report and later than the date required above for the filing of the Annual Report if they are not available by that date. (b) Change of Fiscal Year. If the Authority's fiscal year changes, it shall give notice of such change in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(b), and subsequent Annual Report filings shall be made no later than six months after the end of such new fiscal year end. (c) Delivery of Annual Report to Dissemination Agent. Not later than fifteen (15) Business Days prior to the date specified in subsection (a) (or, if applicable, subsection (b)) of this Section 3 for providing the Annual Report to EMMA, the Authority shall provide the Annual Report to the Dissemination Agent (if other than the Authority). If by such date the Dissemination Agent has not received a copy of the Annual Report, the Dissemination Agent shall notify the Authority.
E-2
(d) Report of Non -Compliance. If the Authority is the Dissemination Agent and is unable to file an Annual Report by the date required in subsection (a) (or, if applicable, subsection (b)) of this Section 3, the Authority shall in a timely manner send a notice to EMMA substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. If the Authority is not the Dissemination Agent and is unable to provide an Annual Report to the Dissemination Agent by the date required in subsection (c) of this Section 3, the Dissemination Agent shall send a notice to EMMA in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A in a timely manner. (e) Annual Compliance Certification. The Dissemination Agent shall, if the Dissemination Agent is other than the Authority, file a report with the Authority certifying that the Annual Report has been filed with EMMA pursuant to Section 3 of this Disclosure Agreement, stating the date it was so provided and filed.
Section 4. Content of Annual Reports. The Annual Report for each fiscal year commencing with the Annual Report for the 2021-22 fiscal year, shall contain or incorporate by reference the following:
(a) Financial Statements. Audited financial statements of the Authority for the most recently completed fiscal year, prepared in accordance generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the Authority's audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. (b) Other Annual Information. The Annual Report for each fiscal year shall also include the following information:
(i) The principal amount of Bonds Outstanding as of the September 30 next preceding the date of the Annual Report.
(ii) The balance of funds in the Reserve Fund, the amount available to be drawn under the Reserve Fund Insurance Policy, and a statement of the Reserve Requirement, as of the September 30 next preceding the date of the Annual Report.
(iii) The total assessed value of all parcels within the District on which the Special Taxes are levied, as shown on the assessment roll of the County Assessor last equalized prior to the September 30 next preceding the date of the Annual Report, a statement of value -to -lien ratios therefor, by categories, and the current fiscal year's Special Tax levy amounts, in a table similar to Table 5 in the Official Statement.
(iv) The Special Tax aggregate delinquency rate for all parcels within the District on which the Special Taxes are levied, the aggregate number of parcels within the District on which the Special Taxes are levied and which are delinquent in payment or Special Taxes, and the percentage of the most recent annual Special Tax levy that is delinquent, all as of the September 30 next preceding the date of the Annual Report.
(v) The status of foreclosure proceedings for any parcels within the District on which the Special Taxes are levied and a summary or the results of E-3
any foreclosure sales, or other collection efforts with respect to delinquent Special Taxes, as of the September 30 next preceding the date of the Annual Report.
(vi) The most recent annual information required to be provided to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission pursuant to Section
9.07(A) of the Fiscal Agent Agreement, and the most recent annual information required to be provided to the Authority pursuant to Section 9.07(C) of the Fiscal Agent Agreement.
(c) Cross References. Any or all of the items listed above may be included by specific reference to other documents, including official statements of debt issues of the Authority or related public entities, which are available to the public on EMMA. The Authority shall clearly identify each such other document so included by reference. If the document included by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from EMMA.
(d) Further Information. In addition to any of the information expressly required to be provided under paragraph (b) of this Section 4, the Authority shall provide such further information, if any, as may be necessary to make the specifically required statements, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.
Section 5. Reporting of Listed Events.
(a) Reportable Events. The Authority shall give, or shall cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds:
(1) Principal and interest payment delinquencies.
(2) Non—payment related defaults, if material.
(3) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties. (4) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties. (5) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform. (6) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701—TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security. (7) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material. (8) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers.
(9) Defeasances.
(10) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material.
person.
(11) Rating changes.
(12) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated E-4
(13) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the obligated person, or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person (other than in the ordinary course of business), the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action, or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material. (14) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material.
(15) The incurrence of a financial obligation of the obligated person, if material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a financial obligation of the obligated person, any of which affect security holders, if material.
(16) A default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar events under the terms of a financial obligation of the obligated person, any of which reflect financial difficulties.
(b) If a Listed Event occurs, the Authority shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent (if not the Authority) to, file a notice of such occurrence with the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, in a timely manner not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the Listed Event. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notice of Listed Events regarding bond calls described in subsection (a)(8) above need not be given under this subsection any earlier than the notice (if any) of the underlying event is given to owners of affected Bonds under the Fiscal Agent Agreement.
(c) The Authority acknowledges that the events described in subparagraphs (a)(2), (a)(7), (a)(8) (if the event is a bond call), (a)(10), (a)(13), (a)(14) and (a)(15) of this Section 5 contain the qualifier "if material" and that subparagraph (a)(6) also contains the qualifier "material" with respect to certain notices, determinations or other events affecting the tax status of the Bonds.
The Authority shall cause a notice to be filed as set forth in paragraph (b) above with respect to any such event only to the extent that the Authority determines the event's occurrence is material for purposes of U.S. federal securities law. The Authority intends that the words used in paragraphs (15) and (16) and the definition of "financial obligation" to have the meanings ascribed thereto in SEC Release No. 34-83885 (August 20, 2018). (d) For purposes of this Disclosure Agreement, any event described in paragraph (a)(12) above is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent, or similar officer for the Authority in a proceeding under the United States Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the Authority, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement, or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the Authority.
Section 6. Identifying Information for Filings with EMMA. All documents provided to EMMA under this Disclosure Agreement shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB.
Section 7. Termination of Reporting Obligation. The Authority's obligations under this Disclosure Agreement shall terminate upon the defeasance, prior redemption or payment in full of all of the Bonds. If such termination occurs prior to the final maturity of the Bonds, the E-5
Authority shall give notice of such termination in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(b).
Section 8. Dissemination Agent.
(a) Appointment of Dissemination Agent. The Authority may, from time to time, appoint or engage a Dissemination Agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under this Disclosure Agreement and may discharge any such agent, with or without appointing a successor Dissemination Agent. The initial Dissemination Agent shall be Webb Municipal Finance, LLC.
If the Dissemination Agent is not the Authority, the Dissemination Agent shall not be responsible in any manner for the content of any notice or report prepared by the Authority pursuant to this Disclosure Agreement. It is understood and agreed that any information that the Dissemination Agent may be instructed to file with EMMA shall be prepared and provided to it by the Authority. The Dissemination Agent has undertaken no responsibility with respect to the content of any reports, notices or disclosures provided to it under this Disclosure Agreement and has no liability to any person, including any Bond owner, with respect to any such reports, notices or disclosures. The fact that the Dissemination Agent or any affiliate thereof may have any fiduciary or banking relationship with the Authority shall not be construed to mean that the Dissemination Agent has actual knowledge of any event or condition, except as may be provided by written notice from the Authority. (b) Compensation of Dissemination Agent. The Dissemination Agent shall be paid compensation by the Authority for its services provided hereunder as agreed to between the Dissemination Agent and the Authority from time to time and all expenses, legal fees and expenses and advances made or incurred by the Dissemination Agent in the performance of its duties hereunder, with payment to be made from any lawful funds of the District. The Dissemination Agent shall not be deemed to be acting in any fiduciary capacity for the Authority, the owners of the Bonds, the Beneficial Owners, or any other party. The Dissemination Agent may rely, and shall be protected in acting or refraining from acting, upon any written direction from the Authority or a written opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel. The Dissemination Agent may at any time resign by giving written notice of such resignation to the Authority. The Dissemination Agent shall not be liable hereunder except for its negligence or willful misconduct.
(c) Responsibilities of Dissemination Agent. In addition of the filing obligations of the Dissemination Agent set forth in Sections 3(e) and 5, the Dissemination Agent shall be obligated, and hereby agrees, to provide a request to the Authority to compile the information required for its Annual Report at least 30 days prior to the date such information is to be provided to the Dissemination Agent pursuant to subsection (c) of Section 3. The failure to provide or receive any such request shall not affect the obligations of the Authority under Section 3.
Section 9. Amendment; Waiver. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Disclosure Agreement, the Authority may amend this Disclosure Agreement (and the Dissemination Agent shall agree to any amendment so requested by the Authority that does not impose any greater duties or risk of liability on the Dissemination Agent), and any provision of this Disclosure Agreement may be waived, provided that all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) Change in Circumstances. If the amendment or waiver relates to the provisions of Sections 3(a), 4 or 5(a) or (b), it may only be made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements, change in law, or change E-6
in the identity, nature, or status of an obligated person with respect to the Bonds, or the type of business conducted.
(b) Compliance as of Issue Date. The undertaking, as amended or taking into account such waiver, would, in the opinion of a nationally recognized bond counsel, have complied with the requirements of the Rule at the time of the original issuance of the Bonds, after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in circumstances.
(c) Consent of Holders, Non -impairment Opinion. The amendment or waiver either (i) is approved by the Bond owners in the same manner as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement for amendments to the Fiscal Agent Agreement with the consent of Bond owners, or (ii) does not, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, materially impair the interests of the Bond owners or Beneficial Owners.
If this Disclosure Agreement is amended or any provision of this Disclosure Agreement is waived, the Authority shall describe such amendment or waiver in the next following Annual Report and shall include, as applicable, a narrative explanation of the reason for the amendment or waiver and its impact on the type (or in the case of a change of accounting principles, on the presentation) of financial information or operating data being presented by the Authority. In addition, if the amendment relates to the accounting principles to be followed in preparing financial statements, (i) notice of such change shall be given in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(b), and (ii) the Annual Report for the year in which the change is made should present a comparison (in narrative form and also, if feasible, in quantitative form) between the financial statements as prepared on the basis of the new accounting principles and those prepared on the basis of the former accounting principles.
Section 10. Additional Information. Nothing in this Disclosure Agreement shall be deemed to prevent the Authority from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Agreement or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event, in addition to that which is required by this Disclosure Agreement. If the Authority chooses to include any information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Disclosure Agreement, the Authority shall have no obligation under this Disclosure Agreement to update such information or include it in any future Annual Report or future notice of occurrence of a Listed Event.
Section 11. Default. In the event of a failure of the Authority to comply with any provision of this Disclosure Agreement, any Bond owner, any Beneficial Owner or the Participating Underwriter may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the Authority to comply with its obligations under this Disclosure Agreement. The sole remedy under this Disclosure Agreement in the event of any failure of the Authority to comply with this Disclosure Agreement shall be an action to compel performance.
Section 12. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Agreement shall inure solely to the benefit of the Authority, the Fiscal Agent, the Dissemination Agent, the Participating Underwriter and the owners and the Beneficial Owners from time to time of the Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity.
Section 13. Counterparts. This Disclosure Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
E-7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Disclosure Agreement as of the date first above written.
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY
in
Jennifer Hennessy,
Treasurer
WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE, LLC, as
Dissemination Agent
By:
Its:
E-8
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT
Name of Obligor: Temecula Public Financing Authority
Name of Bond Issue: Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek), 2022 Special Tax Refunding Bonds Date of Issuance: June 2022
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Obligor has not provided an Annual Report with respect to the above -named Bonds as required by Section 5.17 of the Fiscal Agent Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2022, between the Obligor and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as fiscal agent. The Obligor anticipates that the Annual Report will be filed by Date:
By: Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, as
Dissemination Agent
E-9
APPENDIX F
DTC AND THE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM
The information in this Appendix F has been provided by The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, NY, for use in securities offering documents, and the Authority does not take responsibility for the accuracy or completeness thereof. The Authority cannot and does not give any assurances that DTC, DTC Participants or Indirect Participants will distribute the Beneficial Owners either (a) payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, with respect to the 2022 Bonds or (b) certificates representing ownership interest in or other confirmation of ownership interest in the 2022 Bonds, or that they will so do on a timely basis or that DTC, DTC Direct Participants or DTC Indirect Participants mill act in the manner described in this Official Statement.
The following description of DTC, the procedures and record keeping with respect to beneficial ownership interests in the 2022 Bonds, payment of principal, interest and other payments on the 2022 Bonds to DTC Participants or Beneficial Owners, confirmation and transfer of beneficial ownership interest in the 2022 Bonds and other related transactions by and between DTC, the DTC Participants and the Beneficial Owners is based solely on information provided by DTC. Accordingly, no representations can be made concerning these matters and neither the DTC Participants nor the Beneficial Owners should rely on the foregoing information with respect to such matters, but should instead confirm the same with DTC or the DTC Participants, as the case may be.
Neither the Authority as the issuer of the 2022 Bonds (the "Issuer") nor the fiscal agent or paying agent appointed with respect to the 2022 Bonds (the "Agent") take any responsibility for the information contained in this Appendix.
No assurances can be given that DTC, DTC Participants or Indirect Participants will distribute to the Beneficial Owners (a) payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, with respect to the 2022 Bonds, (b) certificates representing ownership interest in or other confirmation or ownership interest in the 2022 Bonds, or (c) redemption or other notices sent to DTC or Cede & Co., its nominee, as the registered owner of the 2022 Bonds, or that they will so do on a timely basis, or that DTC, DTC Participants or DTC Indirect Participants will act in the manner described in this Appendix. The current "Rules" applicable to DTC are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the current "Procedures" of DTC to be followed in dealing with DTC Participants are on file with DTC.
1. The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, NY, will act as securities depository for the 2022 Bonds (the "Securities"). The Securities will be issued as fully -registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully -registered Security certificate will be issued for each issue of the Securities, each in the aggregate principal amount of such issue, and will be deposited with DTC. If, however, the aggregate principal amount of any issue exceeds $500 million, one certificate will be issued with respect to each $500 million of principal amount, and an additional certificate will be issued with respect to any remaining principal amount of such issue.
2. DTC, the world's largest securities depository, is a limited -purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a "banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 F-1
countries) that DTC's participants ("Direct Participants") deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post -trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book -entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants' accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations.
DTC is a wholly -owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC").
DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly ("Indirect Participants"). On August 8, 2011, Standard & Poor's downgraded its rating of DTC from AAA to AA+. The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com and www.dtc.org . The information contained on this Internet site is not incorporated herein by reference.
3. Purchases of Securities under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Securities on DTC's records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Security ("Beneficial Owner") is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants' records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Securities are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in Securities, except in the event that use of the book -entry system for the Securities is discontinued.
4. To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Securities deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC's partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Securities with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Securities; DTC's records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Securities are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers.
5. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of Securities may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Securities, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Security documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of Securities may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Securities for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly to them.
F-2
6. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Securities within an issue are being redeemed, DTC's practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such issue to be redeemed.
7. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to Securities unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC's MMI Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to Issuer as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.'s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts Securities are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy).
8. Redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments on the Securities will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC's practice is to credit Direct Participants' accounts upon DTC's receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from Issuer or Agent, on payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC's records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC, Agent, or Issuer, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
Payment of redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of Issuer or Agent, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants.
9. DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Securities at any time by giving reasonable notice to Issuer or Agent. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor depository is not obtained, Security certificates are required to be printed and delivered.
10. The Issuer may decide to discontinue use of the system of book -entry -only transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, Security certificates will be printed and delivered to DTC.
11. The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC's book -entry system has been obtained from sources that Issuer believes to be reliable, but Issuer takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
F-3
APPENDIX G
SPECIMEN MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE POLICY
G-1
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03
(WOLF CREEK)
2022 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS
BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
May , 2022
Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek)
Temecula, California
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (the "Underwriter"), acting not as a fiduciary or agent for you, but on behalf of itself, offers to enter into this Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority"), acting on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) (the "District"), which, upon acceptance, will be binding upon the Authority and upon the Underwriter.
This offer is made subject to its acceptance by the Authority as evidenced by its execution and delivery to the Underwriter prior to 5:00 p.m. PDT on the date hereof and, if not accepted prior thereto, will be subject to withdrawal by the Underwriter upon written notice delivered to the Authority at any time prior to the acceptance hereof by the Authority.
The Authority acknowledges and agrees that: (i) the purchase and sale of the Bonds (as such term is defined below) pursuant to this Purchase Agreement is an arm's-length commercial transaction between the Authority and the Underwriter; (ii) in connection therewith and with the discussions, undertakings and procedures leading up to the consummation of such transaction, the Underwriter is and has been acting solely as a principal and is not acting as a "municipal advisor" (as defined in Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) to either the Authority or the District; (iii) the Underwriter has not assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the Authority with respect to the offering contemplated hereby or the discussions, undertakings and procedures leading thereto (irrespective of whether the Underwriter has provided other services or is currently providing other services to the Authority on other matters); (iv) the Underwriter has financial interests that may differ from, and be adverse to, those of the Authority and the District; and (v) the Authority has consulted its own legal, financial and other advisors to the extent it has deemed appropriate with respect to this transaction.
1. Purchase and Sale. Subject to the terms and conditions and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and agreements set forth herein, the Underwriter agrees to purchase from the Authority, and the Authority agrees to sell to the Underwriter, all (but not less than all) of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 2022 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds") in the aggregate principal amount specified in Exhibit A hereto. The Bonds shall be dated the Closing Date (as such term is defined below), shall bear interest 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
from said date (payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1 in each year, commencing March 1, 2023) at the rates per annum, shall mature on September 1 in each of the years and in the amounts, and shall be subject to redemption, all as set forth in Exhibit A hereto. The purchase price for the Bonds shall be the amount specified as such in Exhibit A hereto.
2. Description of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be substantially in the form described in, shall be issued and secured under the provisions of, and shall be payable as provided in, the Fiscal Agent Agreement by and between the Authority and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Fiscal Agent (the "Fiscal Agent"), dated as of June 1, 2022 (the "Fiscal Agent Agreement"), approved by Resolution No. TPFA 22-_ adopted by the Board of Directors of the Authority, (the "Board of Directors"), as the legislative body of the Authority and the District, on [April 261, 2022 (the "Resolution of Issuance"). The Bonds and interest thereon will be payable from a special tax (the "Special Tax") levied and collected on the taxable land within the District in accordance with Resolution No. TPFA 03-22, adopted by the Board of Directors on October 28, 2003 (the "Resolution of Formation").
Proceeds of the sale of the Bonds will be used in accordance with the Fiscal Agent Agreement, the Escrow Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2022 (the "Escrow Agreement"), by and between the Authority and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Escrow Bank (the "Escrow Bank"), Article 11 (commencing with Section 53580, of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the "Refunding Law"), and the Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Sections 53311 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California) (the "Act"), along with certain other available funds, to: (i) refund all of the Authority's outstanding Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 2012 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (the "Refunded Bonds"), (ii) fund a reserve fund for the Bonds, and (iii) pay the costs of issuing the Bonds.
The Resolution of Formation and the Resolution of Issuance are collectively referred to herein as the "District Resolutions."
3. Delivery of the Official Statement. Subsequent to its receipt of the Authority's 15c2- 12 Certificate, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, deeming the Preliminary Official Statement for the Bonds, dated May _, 2022 (the "Preliminary Official Statement"), final for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 ("Rule 15c2-12") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), the Underwriter has distributed copies of the Preliminary Official Statement. The Authority hereby ratifies the use by the Underwriter of the Preliminary Official Statement and authorizes the Underwriter to use and distribute in printed and/or electronic format the final Official Statement dated the date hereof (including all information previously permitted to have been omitted from the Preliminary Official Statement by Rule 15c2-12, and any supplements and amendments thereto as have been approved by the Authority as evidenced by the execution and delivery of such document by an officer of the Authority) (the "Official Statement"), the Fiscal Agent Agreement, the Escrow Agreement, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement dated as of June 1, 2022 by and between the Authority and Webb Municipal Finance, LLC (the "Disclosure Agreement"), this Purchase Agreement, and all information contained therein, and all other documents, certificates and written statements furnished by the Authority to the Underwriter in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Purchase Agreement, in connection with the offer and sale of the Bonds by the Underwriter. The Underwriter hereby agrees to deliver a copy of the Official Statement to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "MSRB") through the Electronic Municipal Marketplace Access website of the MSRB on or before the Closing Date and otherwise to comply with all applicable statutes and regulations in connection with the offering and sale of the Bonds, including, without limitation, MSRB Rule G-32 and Rule 15c2-12.
2 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
4. The Closing. At 8:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on June _, 2022, or at such other time or date as shall be agreed upon by the Underwriter and the Authority (such time and date being herein referred to as the "Closing Date"), the Authority will deliver (i) to The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") or to U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, acting as DTC's agent, the Bonds in definitive form (all Bonds being in book -entry form registered in the name of Cede & Co. and having the CUSIP numbers assigned to them printed thereon), duly executed by the officers of the Authority and authenticated by the Fiscal Agent, as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement, and (ii) to the Underwriter, at the offices of Bond Counsel (as such term is defined below), or at such other place as shall be mutually agreed upon by the Authority and the Underwriter, the other documents mentioned in Section 8(d) below; and the Underwriter shall accept such delivery and pay the purchase price of the Bonds in immediately available funds (such delivery and payment being herein referred to as the "Closing").
5. Public Offering. Except as otherwise disclosed in writing and agreed to by the Authority, the Underwriter agrees to make a bona fide public offering of the Bonds at the initial public offering price or prices (or yields) set forth in Exhibit A hereto; provided, however, that the Underwriter reserves the right to: (i) change such prices as the Underwriter deems necessary or desirable, in its sole discretion, in connection with the marketing of the Bonds, (ii) sell the Bonds to certain dealers (including dealers depositing the Bonds into investment trusts) and others at prices lower than the aforesaid initial offering prices and (iii) over -allot or effect transactions which stabilize or maintain the market price of the Bonds at levels above those that might otherwise prevail in the open market and discontinue such stabilizing, if commenced, at any time without prior notice. A "bona fide public offering" shall include an offering to institutional investors or registered investment companies, regardless of the number of such investors to which the Bonds are sold.
6. Establishment of Issue Price.
(a) The Underwriter agrees to assist the Authority in establishing the issue price of the Bonds and shall execute and deliver to the Authority at the Closing an "issue price" or similar certificate, together with the supporting pricing wires or equivalent communications, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, with such modifications as may be appropriate or necessary, in the reasonable judgment of the Underwriter, the Authority and Bond Counsel, to accurately reflect, as applicable, the sales price or prices or the initial offering price or prices to the public of the Bonds. (b) Except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, the Authority will treat the first price at which 10% of each maturity of the Bonds (the "10% test") is sold to the public as the issue price of that maturity. At or promptly after the execution of this Purchase Agreement, the Underwriter shall report to the Authority the price or prices at which it has sold to the public each maturity of the Bonds. If at that time the 10% test has not been satisfied as to any maturity of the Bonds, the Underwriter agrees to promptly report to the Authority the prices at which it sells the unsold Bonds of that maturity to the public. That reporting obligation shall continue, whether or not the Closing Date has occurred, until either (i) the Underwriter has sold all Bonds of that maturity or (ii) the 10% test has been satisfied as to the Bonds of that maturity, provided that, the Underwriter's reporting obligation after the Closing Date may be at reasonable periodic intervals or otherwise upon request of the Authority or Bond Counsel. For purposes of this Section 6, if Bonds mature on the same date but have different interest rates, each separate CUSIP number within that maturity will be treated as a separate maturity of the Bonds.
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
(c) The Underwriter confirms that it has offered the Bonds to the public on or before the date of this Purchase Agreement at the offering price or prices (the "initial offering price"), or at the corresponding yield or yields, set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, except as otherwise set forth therein. Exhibit A also sets forth, as of the date of this Purchase Agreement, the maturities, if any, of the Bonds for which the 10% test has not been satisfied and for which the Authority and the Underwriter agree that the restrictions set forth in the next sentence shall apply, which will allow the Authority to treat the initial offering price to the public of each such maturity as of the sale date as the issue price of that maturity (the "hold -the -offering -price rule"). So long as the hold -the -offering -price rule remains applicable to any maturity of the Bonds, the Underwriter will neither offer nor sell unsold Bonds of that maturity to any person at a price that is higher than the initial offering price to the public during the period starting on the sale date and ending on the earlier of the following:
(1) the close of the fifth (5th) business day after the sale date; or (2) the date on which the Underwriter has sold at least 10% of that maturity of the Bonds to the public at a price that is no higher than the initial offering price to the public.
The Underwriter will advise the Authority promptly after the close of the fifth (5th) business day after the sale date whether it has sold 10% of that maturity of the Bonds to the public at a price that is no higher than the initial offering price to the public. (d) The Underwriter confirms that:
(1) any selling group agreement and any third -party distribution agreement relating to the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, together with the related pricing wires, contains or will contain language obligating each dealer who is a member of the selling group and each broker - dealer that is a parry to such third -party distribution agreement, as applicable:
(A) to report the prices at which it sells to the public the unsold Bonds of each maturity allocated to it, whether or not the Closing Date has occurred, until either all Bonds of that maturity allocated to it have been sold or it is notified by the Underwriter that the 10% test has been satisfied as to the Bonds of that maturity, provided that, the reporting obligation after the Closing Date may be at reasonable periodic intervals or otherwise upon request of the Underwriter, and (ii) to comply with the hold -the -offering -price rule, if applicable, if and for so long as directed by the Underwriter;
(B) to promptly notify the Underwriter of any sales of Bonds that, to its knowledge, are made to a purchaser who is a related party to an underwriter participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (each such term being used as defined below); and (C) to acknowledge that, unless otherwise advised by the dealer or broker -dealer, the Underwriter shall assume that each order submitted by the dealer or broker -dealer is a sale to the public.
(2) any selling group agreement relating to the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, together with the related pricing wires, contains or will contain language obligating each dealer that is a party to a third -party distribution agreement to be employed in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public to require each broker -dealer that is a party to such third -party distribution agreement to (A) report the prices at which it sells to the public the unsold Bonds of each 4 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
maturity allocated to it, whether or not the Closing Date has occurred, until either all Bonds of that maturity allocated to it have been sold or it is notified by the Underwriter or the dealer that the 10% test has been satisfied as to the Bonds of that maturity, provided that, the reporting obligation after the Closing Date may be at reasonable periodic intervals or otherwise upon request of the Underwriter or the dealer, and (B) comply with the hold -the -offering -price rule, if applicable, if and for so long as directed by the Underwriter or the dealer and as set forth in the related pricing wires. (e) The Authority acknowledges that, in making the representations set forth in this section, the Underwriter will rely on (i) in the event a selling group has been created in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, the agreement of each dealer who is a member of the selling group to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold -the -offering -price rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in a selling group agreement and the related pricing wires, and (ii) in the event that a third - party distribution agreement was employed in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds to the public, the agreement of each broker -dealer that is a parry to such agreement to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold -the -offering -price rule, if applicable to the Bonds, as set forth in the third -party distribution agreement and the related pricing wires. The Authority further acknowledges that the Underwriter shall not be liable for the failure of any dealer who is a member of a selling group, or of any broker -dealer that is a party to a third -party distribution agreement, to comply with its corresponding agreement to comply with the requirements for establishing issue price of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, its agreement to comply with the hold -the -offering -price rule, if applicable to the Bonds.
(f) The Underwriter acknowledges that sales of any Bonds to any person that is a related party to an underwriter participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (each such term being used as defined below) shall not constitute sales to the public for purposes of this section. Further, for purposes of this section:
(1) "public" means any person other than an underwriter or a related party. (2) "underwriter" means (A) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract with the Authority (or with the lead underwriter to form an underwriting syndicate) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public and (B) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract directly or indirectly with a person described in clause (A) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public (including a member of a selling group or a party to a third -parry distribution agreement participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the public), (3) a purchaser of any of the Bonds is a "related party" to an underwriter if the underwriter and the purchaser are subject, directly or indirectly, to (A) more than 50% common ownership of the voting power or the total value of their stock, if both entities are corporations (including direct ownership by one corporation of another), (B) more than 50% common ownership of their capital interests or profits interests, if both entities are partnerships (including direct ownership by one partnership of another), or (C) more than 50% common ownership of the value of the outstanding stock of the corporation or the capital interests or profit interests of the partnership, as applicable, if one entity is a corporation and the other entity is a partnership (including direct ownership of the applicable stock or interests by one entity of the other), and 5 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
(4) "sale date" means the date of execution of this Purchase Agreement by the Authority and the Underwriter.
7. Representations, Warranties and Agreements of the Authority. The Authority represents, warrants and covenants to and agrees with the Underwriter that:
(a) The Authority is duly organized and validly existing as a joint exercise of powers authority under the laws of the State of California and has duly authorized the formation of the District pursuant to the Resolution of Formation and the Act. The Board of Directors, as the legislative body of the Authority and the District, has duly adopted the District Resolutions, and has caused to be recorded a Notice of Special Tax Lien in the real property records of the County of Riverside as Document No. 2003-894897 (the "Notice of Special Tax Lien"). The District Resolutions and Notice of Special Tax Lien are collectively referred to herein as the "Formation Documents." Each of the Formation Documents remains in full force and effect as of the date hereof and has not been amended, modified or supplemented. The District is duly organized and validly existing as a community facilities district under the laws of the State of California (the "State"). The Authority has, and at the Closing Date will have, as the case may be, full legal right, power and authority (i) to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Purchase Agreement, the Fiscal Agent Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Disclosure Agreement (collectively, the "Authority Documents") and to carry out all transactions on its part contemplated by each of the Authority Documents and the Official Statement; and (ii) to issue, sell and deliver the Bonds to the Underwriter pursuant to the Resolution of Issuance and the Fiscal Agent Agreement and as provided herein. (b) The Authority has complied, and will at the Closing Date be in compliance, in all material respects, with the Formation Documents and the Authority Documents, and any immaterial non-compliance by the Authority will not impair the ability of the Authority to carry out, give effect to or consummate the transactions on its part contemplated by the foregoing. From and after the date of issuance of the Bonds, the Authority will continue to comply with the covenants of the Authority contained in the Authority Documents.
(c) The Board of Directors has duly and validly: (i) adopted the District Resolutions, (ii) called, held and conducted in accordance with all requirements of the Act an election within the District to approve the levy of the Special Tax within the District and to authorize bonded indebtedness of the District, (iii) authorized and approved the issuance of the Bonds and due performance by the Authority of its obligations set forth in the Authority Documents, (iv) authorized the preparation, delivery and distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement, and (v) authorized and approved the performance by the Authority of its obligations contained in, and the taking of any and all action as may be necessary to carry out, give effect to and consummate the transactions contemplated by, each of the Authority Documents (including, without limitation, the levy of the Special Tax), the Bonds and the Official Statement; and, at the Closing Date, the Formation Documents will be in full force and effect and the Authority Documents and the Bonds will constitute the valid, legal and binding obligations of the Authority and (assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by other parties thereto, where necessary) will be enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and to the application of equitable principles if equitable remedies are sought and to the limitations on legal remedies against public agencies in the State.
M
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
(d) To the best of the Authority's knowledge, neither the Authority nor the District is in breach of or default under any applicable law or administrative rule or regulation of the State or the United States, or of any department, division, agency or instrumentality thereof, or under any applicable court or administrative decree or order to which the Authority or the District is subject, or under any loan agreement, note, resolution, fiscal agent agreement, contract, agreement or other instrument to which the Authority or District is a party or is otherwise subject or bound, a consequence of which could be to materially and adversely affect the performance by the Authority or the District of their respective obligations under the Bonds, the Formation Documents or the Authority Documents, and compliance with the provisions of each thereof will not conflict with or constitute a breach of or default under any applicable law or administrative rule or regulation of the State or the United States, or of any department, division, agency or instrumentality thereof, or under any applicable court or administrative decree or order to which the Authority or the District is subject, or a material breach of or default under any loan agreement, note, resolution, indenture, fiscal agent agreement, trust agreement, contract, agreement or other instrument to which the Authority or the District is a party or is otherwise subject or bound.
(e) Except for compliance with blue sky or other states securities law filings, as to which the Authority makes no representations, all approvals, consents, authorizations, elections and orders of or filings or registrations with any State governmental authority, board, agency or commission having jurisdiction which would constitute a condition precedent to, or the absence of which would materially adversely affect, the performance by the Authority of its obligations hereunder, or under the Formation Documents or the Authority Documents, have been obtained and are in full force and effect.
(f) The Special Tax constituting the source of funds for the payment of the Bonds has been duly and lawfully authorized and may be levied under the Act, the State Constitution and the applicable laws of the State; and such Special Tax constitutes a valid and legally binding continuing lien on the properties on which it has been levied (except to the extent that any of such property has, or at or prior to the Closing Date, will have, prepaid its Special Tax obligation); except as described in the Official Statement, the Authority is unaware of any outstanding special assessment liens or special tax liens applicable to any property within the District other than the Special Tax authorized to be levied by the Authority on behalf of the District; and the Authority has no present intention of conducting further proceedings leading to the levying of any additional special assessments or special taxes against any such property.
(g) The Authority will not supplement or amend the Official Statement or cause the Official Statement to be supplemented or amended without prior written notification to the Underwriter. Until the date which is twenty-five (25) days after the "end of the underwriting period" (as hereinafter defined), if any event shall occur of which the Authority is aware, as a result of which it may be necessary to supplement the Official Statement in order to make the statements in the Official Statement, in light of the circumstances existing at such time, not misleading, the Authority shall forthwith notify the Underwriter of such event and shall cooperate fully in furnishing any information available to it for any supplement to the Official Statement necessary, in the Underwriter's reasonable opinion, so that the statements therein as so supplemented will not be misleading in light of the circumstances existing at such time; and the Authority shall promptly furnish to the Underwriter a reasonable number of copies of such supplement. If any such amendment or supplement of the Official Statement shall occur after the Closing Date, the Authority also shall furnish, or cause to be furnished, such additional legal opinions, certificates, instruments and other documents as the Underwriter may reasonably deem necessary to evidence the truth and accuracy of such amendment or supplement to 7 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
the Official Statement. As used herein, the term "end of the underwriting period" means the later of such time as (i) the Authority delivers the Bonds to the Underwriter, or (ii) the Underwriter does not retain, directly or as a member of an underwriting syndicate, an unsold balance of the Bonds for sale to the public; and unless the Underwriter gives notice to the contrary, the "end of the underwriting period" shall be deemed to be the Closing Date. Any notice delivered pursuant to this provision shall be written notice delivered to the Authority at or prior to the Closing Date, and shall specify a date (other than the Closing Date) to be deemed the "end of the underwriting period." (h) The Fiscal Agent Agreement creates a valid pledge of the Special Taxes and the moneys in the Bond Fund, the Reserve Fund and, until disbursed as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement, the Special Tax Fund established pursuant to the Fiscal Agent Agreement, including the investments thereof, subject in all cases to the provisions of the Fiscal Agent Agreement permitting the application thereof for the purposes and on the terms and conditions set forth therein. Until such time as moneys have been set aside in an amount sufficient to pay all then outstanding Bonds at maturity or to the date of redemption if redeemed prior to maturity, plus unpaid interest thereon to maturity or to the date of redemption if redeemed prior to maturity, and premium, if any, the Authority will faithfully perform and abide by all of its obligations under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. (i) Except as disclosed in the Official Statement, no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, regulatory agency, public board or body with respect to which the Authority has been served with process or has received pleadings or equivalent documents is pending or, to the best knowledge of the Authority, is threatened (i) which would materially adversely affect the ability of the Authority to perform its obligations under the Bonds, the Formation Documents or the Authority Documents, or (ii) which seeks to restrain or to enjoin the issuance, sale or delivery of the Bonds, the application of the proceeds thereof in accordance with the Fiscal Agent Agreement and the Escrow Agreement, or the collection or application of the Special Tax pledged or to be pledged to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, or the pledge thereof, or in any way contests or affects the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the Formation Documents, the Authority Documents, or any action contemplated by any of said documents, or (iii) which in any way contests the completeness or accuracy of the Official Statement or the powers or authority of the Authority with respect to the Bonds, the Formation Documents, the Authority Documents, or any action of the Authority or the District contemplated by any of said documents; nor is there any action pending with respect to which the Authority has been served with process or has received pleadings or equivalent documents or, to the best knowledge of the Authority, threatened against the Authority or the District which alleges that interest on the Bonds is not excludable from gross income of the owners of the Bonds for federal income tax purposes or is not exempt from California personal income taxation.
0) The Authority will furnish such information, execute such instruments and take such other action in cooperation with the Underwriter as the Underwriter may reasonably request in order for the Underwriter to qualify the Bonds for offer and sale under the blue sky or other securities laws and regulations of such states and other jurisdictions of the United States as the Underwriter may designate; provided, however, the Authority shall not be required to register as a dealer or a broker of securities or to consent to service of process in connection with any blue sky filing. (k) Any certificate signed by any official of the Authority authorized by the Board of Directors of the Authority to do so shall be deemed a representation and warranty to the Underwriter as to the statements made therein.
8 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
(1) The Authority will apply the proceeds of the Bonds in accordance with the Fiscal Agent Agreement and as described in the Official Statement. (m) The information contained in the Preliminary Official Statement (other than any information supplied by the Underwriter and any information regarding DTC or its book -entry system, as to which no view is expressed) was as of the date thereof, and the information contained in the Official Statement (other than any information supplied by the Underwriter, any information regarding DTC or its book -entry system, and CUSIP numbers, as to which no view is expressed) is as of its date and will be on the Closing Date, true and correct in all material respects; and such information does not and shall not contain any untrue or misleading statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(n) The Preliminary Official Statement heretofore delivered to the Underwriter has been deemed final by the Authority as of its date, except for the omission of such information as is permitted to be omitted in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c2-12. The Authority hereby covenants and agrees that, within seven (7) business days from the date hereof, or, if sooner, upon reasonable written notice from the Underwriter, within sufficient time to accompany any confirmation requesting payment for the Bonds from any customer of the Underwriter, the Authority shall deliver to the Underwriter a final Official Statement, executed on behalf of the Authority by an authorized representative of the Authority and dated the date hereof, which shall include information permitted to be omitted by paragraph (b)(1) of the Rule and with such other amendments or supplements as shall have been approved by the Authority and the Underwriter. (o) The Authority will advise the Underwriter promptly of any proposal to amend or supplement the Official Statement and will not effect or consent to any such amendment or supplement without the consent of the Underwriter, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
The Authority will advise the Underwriter promptly of the institution of any proceedings known to it by any governmental authority prohibiting or otherwise affecting the use of the Official Statement in connection with the offering, sale or distribution of the Bonds. (p) Except as disclosed in the Official Statement, the Authority is not, and has not been within the last five (5) years, in material breach of any reporting obligation that it has undertaken under Rule 15c2-12. To the best knowledge of the Authority neither the City of Temecula (the "City") nor any public agency for which the City Council of the City serves as the legislative body is, or has been within the last five (5) years, in material breach of any reporting obligation that it has undertaken under Rule 15c2-12.
(q) Prior to the end of the underwriting period, the Authority shall not amend, terminate, or rescind, and will not agree to any amendment, termination, or rescission of the Formation Documents or the Authority Documents without the prior written consent of the Underwriter (which consent shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld). (r) The Authority shall not knowingly take or omit to take any action that, under existing law, may adversely affect the exemption from personal income taxation of the State or the exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes of the interest on the Bonds.
8. Conditions to the Obligations of the Underwriter. The obligations of the Underwriter to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds on the Closing Date shall be subject, at the 9 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
option of the Underwriter, to the accuracy in all material respects of the representations and warranties on the part of the Authority contained herein, as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date, to the accuracy in all material respects of the statements of the officers and other officials of the Authority made in any certificates or other documents furnished pursuant to the provisions hereof, to the performance by the Authority of its obligations to be performed hereunder at or prior to the Closing Date and to the following additional conditions:
(a) At the Closing Date, the Formation Documents and the Authority Documents shall be in full force and effect, and shall not have been amended, modified or supplemented, except as may have been agreed to in writing by the Underwriter, and there shall have been taken in connection therewith, with the issuance of the Bonds and the refunding of the Refunded Bonds and with the transactions contemplated thereby and by this Purchase Agreement, all such actions as, in the opinion of Quint & Thimmig LLP ("Bond Counsel") shall be necessary and appropriate. (b) The information contained in the Official Statement will, as of the Closing Date and as of the date of any supplement or amendment thereto pursuant to Section 7(g) hereof, be true and correct in all material respects and will not, as of the Closing Date or as of the date of any supplement or amendment thereto pursuant to Section 7(g) hereof, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. (c) Between the date hereof and the Closing Date, the market price or marketability of the Bonds at the initial offering prices set forth in the Official Statement or the ability of the Underwriter to enforce contracts for the sale of Bonds shall not have been materially adversely affected, in the reasonable judgment of the Underwriter (as evidenced by a written notice to the Authority terminating the obligation of the Underwriter to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds), by reason of any of the following:
(1) legislation introduced in or enacted (or resolution passed) by the Congress of the United States of America or recommended to the Congress by the President of the United States, the Department of the Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, or any member of Congress, or favorably reported for passage to either House of Congress by any committee of such House to which such legislation had been referred for consideration or a decision rendered by a court established under Article III of the Constitution of the United States of America or by the Tax Court of the United States of America, or an order, ruling, regulation (final, temporary or proposed), press release or other form of notice issued or made by or on behalf of the Treasury Department or the Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America, with the purpose or effect, directly or indirectly, of imposing federal income taxation upon the interest that would be received by the owners of the Bonds beyond the extent to which such interest is subject to taxation as of the date hereof, (2) legislation introduced in or enacted (or resolution passed) by the Congress of the United States of America, or an order, decree or injunction issued by any court of competent jurisdiction, or an order, ruling, regulation (final, temporary or proposed), press release or other form of notice issued or made by or on behalf of the SEC, or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction of the subject matter, to the effect that obligations of the general character of the Bonds, or the Bonds, including any or all underlying arrangements, are not exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or that the Fiscal Agent Agreement is not exempt from qualification under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, or that the issuance, offering or sale of obligations of the general character of the Bonds, or of the Bonds, including any or all underlying 10 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
arrangements, as contemplated hereby or by the Official Statement is or would be in violation of the federal securities laws, rules or regulations as amended and then in effect; (3) any amendment to the federal or California Constitution or action by any federal or State court, legislative body, regulatory body or other authority materially adversely affecting the tax status of the Authority or the District, their respective properties, incomes, or securities (or interest thereon), the validity or enforceability of the Special Tax or the ability of the Authority to refund the Refunded Bonds as contemplated by the Formation Documents, the Authority Documents or the Official Statement;
(4) any event occurring, or information becoming known, which, in the reasonable judgment of the Underwriter, makes untrue in any material respect any statement or information contained in the Preliminary Official Statement or the Official Statement, or results in the Preliminary Official Statement or the Official Statement containing any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading and (x) the Authority refuses to permit the Official Statement to be supplemented to supply such statement or information or (y) the effect of any such supplement would be to materially adversely affect the market price or marketability of the Bonds or the ability of the Underwriter to enforce contracts for the sale of the Bonds;
(5) a declaration of war or an escalation of, or engagement in, military hostilities by the United States or the occurrence of any other national or international emergency or calamity relating to the effective operation of the government of, or the financial community in, the United States;
(6) the declaration of a general banking moratorium by federal, State of New York or State of California authorities, or the general suspension of trading on any national securities exchange or the fixing and maintaining in force of minimum or maximum prices for trading or maximum ranges for prices for securities on the New York Stock Exchange or other national securities exchange, whether by virtue of determination by that exchange or by order of the SEC or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction;
(7) the imposition by the New York Stock Exchange or other national securities exchange, or any governmental authority, of any material restrictions not now in force with respect to the Bonds or obligations of the general character of the Bonds or securities generally, or the material increase of any such restrictions now in force, including those relating to the extension of credit by, or the charge to the net capital requirements of, the Underwriter; (8) a material disruption in securities settlement, payment or clearance services affecting the Bonds shall have occurred;
(9) there shall have been any material adverse change in the financial affairs of the Authority or the District;
(10) there shall be filed or threatened any litigation described in Section 7(i); (11) there shall be established any new restriction on transactions in securities materially affecting the free market for securities (including the imposition of any limitation 11 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
on interest rates) or the extension of credit by, or a change to the net capital requirements of, underwriters established by the New York Stock Exchange, the SEC, any other federal or State agency or the Congress of the United States, or by Executive Order; or (12) a stop order, release, regulation, or no -action letter by or on behalf of the SEC or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction of the subject matter shall have been issued or made to the effect that the issuance, offering, or sale of the Bonds, including all the underlying obligations as contemplated hereby or by the Official Statement, or any document relating to the issuance, offering or sale of the Bonds is or would be in violation of any provision of federal securities laws at the Closing Date.
(d) On the Closing Date, the Underwriter shall have received originals or true and correct copies of the following documents, in either printed or electronic format in each case satisfactory in form and substance to the Underwriter:
(1) The Formation Documents and the Authority Documents, together with a certificate dated as of the Closing Date of the Secretary of the Authority to the effect that each District Resolution is a true, correct and complete copy of the one duly approved or adopted by the Board of Directors;
(2) The Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement; (3) An unqualified approving opinion of Bond Counsel, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Authority, in the form attached to the Official Statement as Appendix D, and a letter from Bond Counsel, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Underwriter, to the effect that such approving opinion may be relied upon by the Underwriter to the same extent as if such opinion was addressed to it;
(4) A supplemental opinion of Bond Counsel, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Underwriter, to the effect that (i) the Escrow Agreement, the Authority Disclosure Agreement and this Purchase Agreement have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Authority, and, assuming such agreements constitute valid and binding obligations of the respective other parties thereto, they constitute the legally valid and binding agreements of the Authority enforceable in accordance with their terms, except as enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, moratorium, insolvency or other laws affecting creditor's rights or remedies and by general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in equity or at law); (ii) the Bonds are not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Fiscal Agent Agreement is exempt from qualification under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended; and (iii) the information contained in the Official Statement on the cover and under the captions "INTRODUCTION," "PLAN OF REFUNDING," "THE 2022 BONDS (excluding the subheading "Scheduled Debt Service")," "SECURITY FOR THE 2022 BONDS," "TAX MATTERS," and Appendices C and D thereof is accurate, insofar as such information purports to summarize or replicate certain provisions of the Act, the Bonds, the Escrow Agreement, the Fiscal Agent Agreement, and Bond Counsel's final approving opinion and the exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes and exemption from State personal income taxes of interest on the Bonds; (5) A letter of Quint & Thimmig, LLP, as disclosure counsel to the Authority in connection with the Bonds ("Disclosure Counsel"), addressed to the Authority and the Underwriter, to the effect that based upon an examination which they have made, and without having 12 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
undertaken to determine independently the accuracy or completeness of the statements contained in the Preliminary Official Statement or the Official Statement, they have no reason to believe that the Preliminary Official Statement as of its date and as of the date hereof, or the Official Statement as of its date and as of the Closing Date (excluding therefrom any CUSIP numbers, financial statements and other statistical and financial data, projections, estimates, assumptions and expressions of opinion, and information relating to The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its book -entry system contained therein and incorporated therein by reference, and statements contained in Appendix B, as to which no view need be expressed) contained or contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; (6) Evidence satisfactory to the Underwriter that the cash to be deposited with the Escrow Bank, as provided for in the Escrow Agreement, will be fully sufficient to pay and discharge the indebtedness on the Refunded Bonds (including all principal, interest and redemption premiums) at or before their respective maturity dates; (7) A defeasance opinion of Bond Counsel, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Underwriter and the Fiscal Agent, to the effect that, upon the deposit of funds with the Escrow Bank as provided for in the Escrow Agreement, the Refunded Bonds will no longer be considered outstanding within the meaning of the fiscal agent agreement pursuant to which they were issued and will not have any lien on, or be payable from, the "special tax revenues" as such term is defined in such fiscal agent agreement;
(8) An opinion, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Underwriter, of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation ("Underwriter's Counsel"), in form and substance acceptable to the Underwriter;
(9) A certificate or certificates, dated the Closing Date and signed by an authorized officer of the Authority, ratifying the use and distribution by the Underwriter of the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement in connection with the offering and sale of the Bonds; and certifying that (i) the representations and warranties of the Authority contained in Section 7 hereof are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the Closing Date with the same effect as if made on the Closing Date, except that all references therein to the Preliminary Official Statement shall be deemed to be references to the Official Statement; (ii) to the best of his or her knowledge, no event has occurred since the date of the Official Statement affecting the matters discussed therein which should be disclosed in the Official Statement for the purposes for which it is to be used in order to make the statements and information contained in the Official Statement not misleading in any material respect; and (iii) the Authority has complied, in all material respects, with all the agreements and satisfied all the conditions on its part to be performed or satisfied under the Authority Documents and the Official Statement at or prior to the Closing Date; (10) An opinion, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Underwriter, of legal counsel to the Authority, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit D; (11) One or more certificates dated the Closing Date from Webb Municipal Finance, LLC (the "Special Tax Consultant") addressed to the Authority and the Underwriter to the effect that (i) the Special Tax, if collected in the maximum amounts permitted from the properties in the District whose Special Tax will not have been prepaid in full at or before the Closing Date, and without regard to the portion thereof levied to pay Administrative Expenses, will generate in each 13 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
Fiscal Year at least 110% of the debt service payable with respect to the Bonds in the calendar year that begins in such Fiscal Year; (ii) all information appearing in the Official Statement for which the Special Tax Consultant is identified as being the source is true and correct as of the date of the Official Statement and as of the Closing Date; and (iii) the statements concerning the Special Tax and the statistical and financial data set forth in the tables and discussion in the Official Statement which were derived from information supplied by the Special Tax Consultant for use in the Official Statement are true, correct and complete in all material respects and do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading and no events or occurrences have been ascertained by the Special Tax Consultant or have come to its attention that would substantially change such information set forth in the Official Statement; (12) A certificate of the Authority dated the Closing Date, in a form acceptable to Bond Counsel, that the Bonds are not arbitrage bonds within the meaning of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;
(13) A certificate of U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association and an opinion of counsel to U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, each dated the Closing Date and addressed to the Authority and the Underwriter, in form satisfactory to Bond Counsel and Underwriter's Counsel, to the effect that U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association has authorized the execution and delivery of the Fiscal Agent Agreement and the Escrow Agreement and that the Fiscal Agent Agreement and the Escrow Agreement are valid and binding obligations of U.S.
Bank Trust Company, National Association enforceable in accordance with their terms; (14) Evidence satisfactory to the Underwriter that a rating has been assigned to the Bonds as described in the Official Statement and that such rating has not been revoked or revised; (15) Written confirmation from the Authority's municipal advisor (or an affiliate thereof) and/or dissemination agent (or such other source as may be reasonably acceptable to the Underwriter) in a form acceptable to the Underwriter that the Authority has timely filed materially complete disclosure reports in conformance with the Authority's continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 in each of the last five fiscal years; (16) Evidence that the federal tax information Form 8038-G has been prepared for filing;
(17) Evidence that the notices of the defeasance of the Refunded Bonds and termination of disclosure obligations relating to the Refunded Bonds has been prepared for fling with the EMMA system of the MSRB;
(18) A municipal bond insurance policy (the "Bond Insurance Policy") issued by [ ] (the "Insurer"), insuring the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds in accordance with the terms thereof as described in the Official Statement, together with an opinion of counsel to the Insurer, dated the Closing Date, in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority and the Underwriter;
(19) A certificate, dated as of the Closing Date, of the Insurer, to the effect that the information included in the Official Statement under the heading "MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE" and in Appendix G thereto is accurate;
14 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
(20) A municipal bond debt service reserve insurance policy (the "Reserve Policy") issued by the Insurer guaranteeing certain payments from the Reserve Fund as provided in such Reserve Policy and in the Fiscal Agent Agreement and subject to the limitations set forth therein; and
(21) Such additional legal opinions, certificates, instruments and other documents as the Underwriter may reasonably request to evidence the truth and accuracy, as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date, of the statements and information contained in the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement, of the Authority's representations and warranties contained herein and the due performance or satisfaction by the Authority at or prior to the Closing of all agreements then to be performed and all conditions then to be satisfied by the Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby and by the Official Statement.
If the Authority shall be unable to satisfy the conditions to the obligations of the Underwriter to purchase, accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds contained in this Purchase Agreement, or if the obligations of the Underwriter to purchase, accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds shall be terminated for any reason permitted by this Purchase Agreement, this Purchase Agreement shall terminate and neither the Underwriter nor the Authority shall be under any further obligation hereunder, except that the respective obligations of the Authority and the Underwriter set forth in Section 10 hereof shall continue in full force and effect.
9. Conditions of the Authority's Obligations. The Authority's obligations hereunder are subject to the Underwriter's performance of its obligations hereunder, and are also subject to the following conditions:
(a) As of the Closing Date, no litigation shall be pending or, to the knowledge of the duly authorized officer of the Authority executing the certificate referred to in Section 8(d)(9) hereof, threatened, to restrain or enjoin the issuance or sale of the Bonds or in any way affecting any authority for or the validity of the Bonds, the Formation Documents, the Authority Documents or the existence or powers of the Authority; and
(b) As of the Closing Date, the Authority shall receive the approving opinion of Bond Counsel referred to in Section 8(d)(3) hereof, dated as of the Closing Date.
10. Expenses. Whether or not the Bonds are delivered to the Underwriter as set forth herein:
(a) The Underwriter shall be under no obligation to pay, and the Authority shall pay or cause to be paid (out of any legally available funds of the Authority or the District), all expenses incident to the performance of the Authority's obligations hereunder, including, but not limited to, the fees for the rating of the Bonds, the cost of printing and delivering the Bonds to DTC, the cost of preparation, printing, distribution and delivery of the Preliminary Official Statement, and the Official Statement (including any amendment thereof or supplement thereto), the reasonable cost of confirming that the Authority has timely filed materially complete disclosure reports in conformance with the Authority's continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 in each of the last five fiscal years; and all other agreements and documents contemplated hereby (and drafts of any thereof) in such reasonable quantities as requested by the Underwriter (excluding the fees and disbursements of the Underwriter's Counsel); the costs of the Bond Insurance Policy and Reserve Policy; and the fees and disbursements of the Fiscal Agent for the Bonds and Bond Counsel, Disclosure Counsel and any 15 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
accountants, engineers or any other experts or consultants the Authority has retained in connection with the Bonds; and
(b) The Authority shall be under no obligation to pay, and the Underwriter shall pay, any fees of the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission, the cost of obtaining CUSIP numbers, the cost of preparation of any "blue sky" or legal investment memoranda and this Purchase Agreement; and all other expenses incurred by the Underwriter in connection with its public offering and distribution of the Bonds (except those specifically enumerated in paragraph (a) of this section), including the fees and disbursements of its counsel and any advertising expenses.
11. Notices. Any notice or other communication to be given to the Authority under this Purchase Agreement may be given by delivering the same in writing to the Authority at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590, Attention: Director of Finance; and any notice or other communication to be given to the Underwriter under this Purchase Agreement may be given by delivering the same in writing to Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, One Montgomery Street, 35th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104, Attention: Sara Oberlies Brown, Managing Director.
12. Parties in Interest. This Purchase Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Authority and the Underwriter (including their successors or assigns), and no other person shall acquire or have any right hereunder or by virtue hereof. The term "successor" shall not include any owner of a Bond merely by virtue of such ownership.
13. Survival of Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties of the Authority set forth in or made pursuant to this Purchase Agreement shall not be deemed to have been discharged, satisfied or otherwise rendered void by reason of the Closing or termination of this Purchase Agreement and regardless of any investigations made by or on behalf of the Underwriter (or statements as to the results of such investigations) concerning such representations and statements of the Authority and regardless of delivery of and payment for the Bonds.
14. Effective. This Purchase Agreement shall become effective and binding upon the respective parties hereto upon the execution of the acceptance hereof by the Authority and shall be valid and enforceable as of the time of such acceptance.
15. No Prior Agreements. This Purchase Agreement supersedes and replaces all prior negotiations, agreements and understandings between the parties hereto in relation to the sale of Bonds for the Authority.
16. Governing Law. This Purchase Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts made and performed in California. 16 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
17. Counterparts. This Purchase Agreement may be executed simultaneously in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Very truly yours,
STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY,
INCORPORATED
Managing Director
ACCEPTED on May _, 2022 at a.m./p.m. PDT:
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE TEMECULA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03
(WOLF CREEK)
Treasurer
17 4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
EXHIBIT A
MATURITY SCHEDULE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03
(WOLF CREEK)
2022 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS
Maturity
Date
(September Principal Interest 10% Test
1) Amount Rate Yield Price Used
Hold the
Offering
Price Used
The purchase price of the Bonds shall be $ which is the principal amount thereof ($ ) less net original issue discount of $ and less Underwriter's discount of The Bonds shall be subject to redemption in accordance with the following:
No Optional Redemption. The Bonds are not subject to optional redemption prior to maturity.
Mandatory Sinking Payment Redemption. The Bonds maturing on September 1, 20_, are subject to mandatory sinking fund payment redemption in part on September 1, 20_, and on each September 1 thereafter to maturity, by lot, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium, from sinking payments as follows:
A-1
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
Redemption Dates
(September 1) Sinking Payments
Mandatory Redemption from Special Tax Prepayments. The Bonds are subject to mandatory redemption prior to their stated maturity on any Interest Payment Date, from the proceeds of Special Tax Prepayments and corresponding transfers of funds from the Reserve Fund, as a whole or in part in an amount equal to $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of the principal among of the Bonds to be redeemed), as set forth below, together with accrued interest thereon to the date fixed for redemption:
Redemption Dates Redemption Prices
any Interest Payment Date from March 1, 2023 to and including March 1, %
September 1, and March 1,
September 1, and March 1,
September 1, and any Interest Payment Date thereafter
A-2
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
EXHIBIT B
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03
(WOLF CREEK)
2022 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS
RULE 15c2-12 CERTIFICATE
The undersigned hereby certifies and represents that she is the Treasurer of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, and, as such, is duly authorized to execute and deliver this certificate and further hereby certifies that:
(1) this certificate is being delivered in connection with the sale and issuance of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 2022 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds") in order to enable the underwriter of the Bonds to comply with Rule 15c2-12 promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Rule");
(2) in connection with the sale and issuance of the Bonds, there has been prepared a Preliminary Official Statement dated May _, 2022 setting forth information concerning the Bonds and the Authority (the "Preliminary Official Statement"); and (3) except for the Permitted Omissions, the Preliminary Official Statement is deemed final within the meaning of the Rule. As used herein, the term "Permitted Omissions" refers to the offering price(s), interest rates(s), selling compensation, aggregate principal amount, principal amount per maturity, delivery dates, ratings and other terms of the Bonds depending on such matters, all as set forth in the Rule.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of May _, 2022.
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE TEMECULA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03
(WOLF CREEK)
By:
Its: Treasurer
B-1
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
EXHIBIT C
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03
(WOLF CREEK)
2022 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS
FORM OF ISSUE PRICE CERTIFICATE
The undersigned, on behalf of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated ("Stifel"), hereby certifies as set forth below with respect to the sale and issuance of the above -captioned obligations (the "Bonds").
1. Sale of the General Rule Maturities. As of the date of this certificate, for each Maturity of the General Rule Maturities, the first price at which at least 10% of such Maturity was sold to the Public is the respective price listed in Schedule A.
2. Initial Offering Price of the Hold -the -Offering -Price Maturities. (a) Stifel offered the Hold -the -Offering -Price Maturities to the Public for purchase at the respective initial offering prices listed in Schedule A (the "Initial Offering Prices") on or before the Sale Date. A copy of the pricing wire or equivalent communication for the Bonds is attached to this certificate as Schedule B.
(b) As set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement, dated , 2022, by and between Stifel and the Issuer, Stifel has agreed in writing that, (i) for each Maturity of the Hold -the - Offering -Price Maturities, it would neither offer nor sell any of the Bonds of such Maturity to any person at a price that is higher than the Initial Offering Price for such Maturity during the Holding Period for such Maturity (the "hold -the -offering -price rule"), and (ii) any selling group agreement shall contain the agreement of each dealer who is a member of the selling group, and any retail distribution agreement shall contain the agreement of each broker -dealer who is a party to the retail distribution agreement, to comply with the hold -the -offering -price rule. Pursuant to such agreement, no Underwriter (as defined below) has offered or sold any Maturity of the Hold -the -Offering -Price Maturities at a price that is higher than the respective Initial Offering Price for that Maturity of the Bonds during the Holding Period.
Reserve Fund.
The establishment of the Reserve Fund for the Bonds in the amount of the Reserve Requirement (as such term is defined in the Fiscal Agent Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2022, by and between the Issuer and U.S Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Fiscal Agent (the Fiscal Agent") pursuant to which the Bonds are being issued) was vital to the marketing of the Bonds and reasonably required to assure payment of debt service on the Bonds.
C-1
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
4. Bond Insurance Policy and Reserve Policy.
(a) The present value of the amount paid to obtain the Bond Insurance Policy and Reserve Policy is less than the present value of the interest reasonably expected to be saved as a result of having the Bond Insurance Policy and Reserve Policy, using the yield with respect to the Bonds as the discount factor for this purpose.
(b) To the best knowledge of the undersigned, the amount paid by the Issuer to the Insurer for the Bond Insurance Policy and the Reserve Policy is within a reasonable range of premiums charged for comparable credit enhancement for obligations comparable to the Bonds.
Defined Terms.
(a) General Rule Maturities means those Maturities of the Bonds listed in Schedule A hereto as the "General Rule Maturities."
(b) Hold -the -Offering -Price Maturities means those Maturities of the Bonds listed in Schedule A hereto as the "Hold -the -Offering -Price Maturities." (c) Holding Period means, with respect to a Hold -the -Offering -Price Maturity, the period starting on the Sale Date and ending on the earlier of (i) the close of the fifth business day after the Sale Date (, 2022), or (ii) the date on which Stifel has sold at least 10% of such Hold - the -Offering -Price Maturity to the Public at prices that are no higher than the Initial Offering Price for such Hold -the -Offering -Price Maturity.
(d) Issuer means the Temecula Public Financing Authority. (e) Maturity means Bonds with the same credit and payment terms. Bonds with different maturity dates, or Bonds with the same maturity date but different stated interest rates, are treated as separate Maturities.
(f) Public means any person (including an individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or corporation) other than an Underwriter or a related party to an Underwriter.
The term "related party" for purposes of this certificate generally means any two or more persons who have greater than 50 percent common ownership, directly or indirectly. (g) Sale Date means the first day on which there is a binding contract in writing for the sale of a Maturity of the Bonds. The Sale Date of the Bonds is 92022. (h) Underwriter means (i) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract with the Issuer (or with the lead underwriter to form an underwriting syndicate) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public, and (ii) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract directly or indirectly with a person described in clause (i) of this paragraph to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public (including a member of a selling group or a party to a retail distribution agreement participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public).
The representations set forth in this certificate are limited to factual matters only. Nothing in this certificate represents Stifel's interpretation of any laws, including specifically Sections 103 and 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. The undersigned understands that the foregoing information will be relied upon by the Issuer with respect C-2
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
to certain of the representations set forth in the Tax Certificate relating to the Issuer's Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 2022 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds") and with respect to compliance with the federal income tax rules affecting the Bonds, and by Quint & Thimmig LLP in connection with rendering its opinion that the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, the preparation of the Internal Revenue Service Form 8038- G, and other federal income tax advice that it may give to the Issuer from time to time relating to the Bonds.
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
Name:
By:
Name:
Dated: , 2022
C-3
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
SCHEDULE A
SALE PRICES OF THE GENERAL RULE MATURITIES AND INITIAL OFFERING
PRICES OF THE HOLD -THE -OFFERING -PRICE MATURITIES
(Attached)
C-4
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
SCHEDULE B
PRICING WIRE OR EQUIVALENT COMMUNICATION
(Attached)
C-5
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
EXHIBIT D
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
San Francisco, California
Authority Counsel Opinion
with reference to
Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 03-03
2022 Special Tax Refunding Bonds
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We serve as General Counsel to the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority").
In such capacity, in connection with the issuance of the above -referenced bonds (the "Bonds") as contemplated by the Bond Purchase Agreement, dated May , 2022 (the "Purchase Agreement"), by and between the Authority, acting on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) (the "District") and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as the Underwriter, we have examined the original, or a copy otherwise identified to us as being a true copy of such documents, certificates, and records as we have deemed relevant and necessary as the basis for the opinion set forth herein. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Purchase Agreement. Relying on such examination and subject to the limitations and qualifications hereinafter set forth, we are of the opinion that:
1. The Authority is duly organized and validly existing as a joint exercise of powers authority under the laws of the State of California and the District is duly organized and validly existing as a community facilities district under the laws of the State of California.
2. The Board of Directors duly and validly adopted Resolution No. TPFA 03-22 on October 28, 2003 (the "Resolution of Formation"), and Resolution No. TPFA 22- on April 26, 2022 (the "Resolution of Issuance"), at meetings of the Board of Directors which were called and held pursuant to law and with all public notice required by law and at which a quorum was present and acting throughout. Each of the Resolution of Formation and the Resolution of Issuance has not been amended, modified or supplemented.
3. To the best of our knowledge, the authorization, execution and delivery of the Authority Documents and compliance with the provisions thereof by the Authority of its obligations thereunder, will not conflict with, or constitute a breach or default under, in any material respect, any law, administrative regulation, court decree, resolution, ordinance or other agreement to which the Authority or District is subject or by which it is bound.
4. To the best of our knowledge and except as disclosed in the Official Statement, there is no litigation, action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity as to which the Authority is D-1
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
or would be a party, before or by any court, governmental agency or body, pending and notice of which has been served on and received by the Authority or, to the best of our knowledge, threatened against the Authority, challenging the creation, organization or existence of the Authority or the District, or the validity of the Bonds or the Authority Documents or contesting the authority of the Authority to enter into or perform its obligations under any of such documents, or with respect to which an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding would materially adversely affect the ability of the Authority to perform its obligations under the Bonds, the Formation Documents, the Authority Documents, or which seeks to restrain or enjoin the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds or which challenges the exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes or State of California personal income taxes of interest on the Bonds, or the application of the proceeds thereof in accordance with the Fiscal Agent Agreement and the Escrow Agreement, or the collection or application of the Special Tax to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, or which in any way contests or affects the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the Formation Documents, the Authority Documents or the accuracy of the Official Statement, or any action of the Authority contemplated by any of said documents.
The opinions expressed herein are based on such examination of the law of the State of California as we deemed relevant for the purposes of this opinion. We have not considered the effect, if any, of the laws of any other jurisdiction upon matters covered by this letter. We express no opinion as to the status of the Bonds or the interest thereon, or the Authority Documents under any federal or state securities laws or "Blue Sky" law or any federal, state or local tax law. No opinion is expressed herein with respect to the validity of the Bonds for which the Authority is relying on the opinion given by Bond Counsel. Further, we express no opinion with respect to any indemnification, contribution, liquidated damages, penalty, right of setoff, arbitration, judicial reference, choice of law, choice of forum, choice of venue, waiver or severability provisions contained in the Authority Documents.
Without limiting any of the foregoing, we express no opinion as to any matter other than as expressly set forth above.
Whenever a statement herein is qualified by "to the best of our knowledge," it shall be deemed to indicate that, during the course of our representation of the Authority in connection with the financing described herein, no information that would give us current, actual knowledge of the inaccuracy of such statement has come to our attention. We have not undertaken any independent investigation to determine the accuracy of such statements, and any limited inquiry undertaken by us during the preparation of this opinion letter should not be regarded as such investigation. No inference as to our knowledge of any matters bearing upon the accuracy of any such statement should be drawn from the fact of our representation of the Authority. We have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to original documents of documents submitted to us as copies or as exhibits, and the authenticity of such originals of such latter documents.
This opinion letter is furnished by us as General Counsel to the Authority, pursuant to Section 8(d)(10) of the Purchase Agreement. No attorney -client relationship has existed or exists between our firm and the addressees hereof in connection with the Bonds or by virtue of this opinion. This opinion letter is rendered solely in connection with the financing described herein, and may not be relied upon by you for any other purpose. The opinions rendered in this letter are as of the date hereof. We disclaim any obligation to update this opinion letter.
D-2
4869-1679-2088v3/200356-0513
Item No. 16
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUBJECT: Approve Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Five -Year Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
(2022-2023), 2022-2026 FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN,
2022 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING, AND
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE
FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDBG) PROGRAM, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED USE OF
FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 INCLUDING ANY
AMENDED OR REVISED AMOUNTS PROVIDED BY HUD
BACKGROUND: The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program was established through the Housing and Community Development Act in 1974. The primary purpose of CDBG funding is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income.
From 1992 to 2012, the City participated in the Riverside County Economic Development Agency Entitlement Program to receive CDBG funding. On June 14, 2011, City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 to request that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) designate the City of Temecula as an Entitlement Community. On April 10, 2012, City Council adopted the first Five -Year Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), authorizing the City to become
an Entitlement Community and direct recipient of CDBG funds from HUD. On April 25, 2017, the City adopted the second Five -Year Consolidated Plan (2017-2021).
As an Entitlement Community, the City of Temecula is required to develop a ConPlan every five years. For each succeeding year, the City is required to prepare a one-year Action Plan to notify citizens and HUD of the City's intended actions to meet CDBG goals during a particular year. This current fiscal year (2021-2022) is the final year of the City's first Consolidated Plan.
The Consolidated Plan is used as a general framework for the City to assess its housing and community development needs and identify its priority projects for its funding allocation. It also includes a market analysis, needs assessment, and strategic plan. It is designed to be a collaborative process whereby community input is gathered and utilized to establish effective housing and community development strategies that respond to the needs of the community.
The Finance Committee, consisting of Mayor Rahn and Council Member Edwards, convened on February 22, 2022, to make recommendations on CDBG funding for the upcoming fiscal year.
Their recommendations are reflected in this report. The draft 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and draft 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan was available for public review from March 28, 2022, through April 26, 2022.
2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing
As a HUD Entitlement Jurisdiction, the City is required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (Al) to assist the City in identifying fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals in order to affirmatively further fair housing.
To identify fair housing issues, HUD requires jurisdictions to gather and analyze data. The data utilized in the analysis are from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS), HUD's AFFH Data and Mapping Tool, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data are generally from the most recent available years, with the exception of the ACS data, which are from the 2013- 2017 estimates in order to align with the data utilized in the Con Plan.
HUD also requires jurisdictions to compare the data for their jurisdiction to regional data. For the purposes of this analysis, HUD defines Temecula's region as the Riverside -San Bernardino - Ontario MSA. Because of Temecula's location in the corner of the region, one must be cautious to draw too many conclusions in comparing Temecula to the region.
Analysis shows that Temecula has a relatively high level of residential integration. Analysis of the data and further community outreach factors that may contribute to disproportionate housing needs in the community including some of the items:
• Cost burdened renters
• Lower home ownership rates for certain household types • Distance to employment centers & access to public transit for certain household types • Unemployment rates associated with areas of poverty
• An aging population
To address these potential issues and trends, the 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing has developed the following goals:
Temecula shall ensure that all HUD -funded programs are marketed in high poverty areas within their jurisdiction in manners that will be accessible to residents to ensure that low-income residents and high poverty neighborhoods have best access to all program activities. Marketing shall be conducted in accordance with the City's Language Access Plan.
To evaluate this goal, Temecula shall maintain documentation showing that it marketed programs in areas of high poverty and conducted such marketing in a way that clearly communicated the program to the residents in those areas.
Temecula shall use CDBG funds to carry out non -housing activities (such as public works, public services, and economic development) in areas of high poverty. This may include carrying out activities citywide but promoting services in those areas or electing to target activities in these areas.
To evaluate this goal, Temecula shall report in the CAPER how its activities promoted anti- poverty goals and objectives.
Temecula shall fund and promote fair housing training for tenants, homebuyers and potential homebuyers to ensure that residents are fully informed of their rights as it relates to housing.
Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Temecula shall fund and promote fair housing training for landlords and realtors to ensure that they understand the fair housing requirements and rights of tenants and homebuyers.
Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
In collaboration with the fair housing provider for Temecula, maintain a page on the City's website that provides access to fair housing resources and documents. Further, collaborate with the fair housing provider to promote trainings and other fair housing related events.
Review and update webpage resources annually with support from fair housing provider and maintain documentation of promoting all trainings and events carried out by the fair housing provider in the jurisdiction.
Establish and maintain a list of all housing and community development resources that is updated annually. This list may include services such as grant or loan programs for reasonable modifications and access to programs such as Meals on Wheels.
Review and update list on an annual basis.
2017-2022 Consolidated Plan Accomplishments
The investment of HUD resources during the 2017-2021 Program Years resulted in measurable accomplishments that contributed to positive outcomes for Temecula residents. Together with other federal, state, and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City of Temecula and its partners to:
• Promote the development of affordable housing
• Preserve the existing housing stock
• Ensure equal access to housing opportunities
• Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents • Provide public services for residents with special needs • Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Provide public services for seniors and veterans
• Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure • Promote economic opportunity
Community Outreach
A total of four Community meetings were held to discuss the housing and community development needs in Temecula. The first series of meetings were held in person on October 27, 2021, at 8 am and 6 pm at the Temecula Community Center. This location was selected to facilitate access to the entire community. The resident survey was released at this time and closed on January 14, 2022.
The second series of meetings were held virtually via Zoom on December 17, 2021, at 9 am and 5 pm.
On October 27, 2021, the City opened it resident survey to afford citizens the greatest opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs of the City. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in their neighborhoods for various types of improvements which could potentially be addressed using CDBG funds. The electronic survey link was published in a newspaper of general circulation, on the City's website and across its social media platforms. Hard copies of the survey were available at the Community Development Department. The resident survey received 126 responses and the stakeholder survey received eight responses.
The Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Five -Year Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan were available for public review between March 28, 2022, through April 26, 2022.
2022-2023 Annual Action Plan
The City of Temecula anticipates receiving approximately $555,982 in addition with $21,604.09 of available unallocated/reprogrammed funds the City will have an available anticipated budget of $577,586.09 through the Community Development Block Grant program for the 2022-23 program year. HUD had not released Fiscal Year 2022-23 allocations when funding recommendations were made by the Finance Subcommittee. The Fiscal Year 2022-23 funding recommendations are based upon the Fiscal Year 2021-22 program budget. The City's 2022-23 anticipated allocation may be altered between the publication of this staff report and the public hearing. Consequently, the proposed resolution allows for staff to make adjustments based on revised allocations from HUD.
A maximum of 20 percent may be allocated for administration of the program, and a maximum of 15 percent may be allocated for public services, with the remainder, approximately $382,992.39, available for capital improvement projects. The breakdown of the estimated budget is demonstrated in the following chart.
2022-2023 CDBG Budget
' 2022-23 Anticipated Allocation $555, 982.00 '
2022-23 Program Income $0.00
Available Unallocated/Reprogrammed Funds $21,604.09
Anticipated Total Funds Available $577,586.09
e All
Maximum 15% of 2022-23 Allocation $83,397.30
Total Public Service Funds Available $83,397.30
W�apital Improvements Allocation
2022-23 Anticipated Allocation 1 $555,982.00
2022-23 Program Income $0.00
Minus Allocated Administrative Funds $111,196.40
Minus Allocated Public Service Funds $83,397.30
Plus Available Reprogrammed Funds $21,604.09
Total Capital Improvements Funds Available $382,992.39
Administrative Funds
Maximum 20% of 2022-23 Allocation $111,196.40
Total Administrative Funds Available $111,196.40
Public Services
A maximum of $83,397.30 (15%) may be allocated for public services during the fiscal year. Staff completed an extensive review of the applications to determine the benefit to low and moderate - income persons, activity need, cost efficiency, effectiveness, activity management, and experience and past performance. A summary of the funding recommendations of the Finance Committee is below. All applicants for the 2022-23 funding period satisfy at least one Consolidated Plan priority and are therefore eligible for funding.
Organization
Program Name
FY 21-22
Allocation
FY 22-23 Subconunitee
Request Recommendation
I
Assistance League of Temecula Valley
Operation School Bell
$ 6,969.61
$ 10,000.00
-
$ 7,271.03
2 Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County
Before & After School Program
$ 6,969.61
$ 20,000.00
$ 7,271.03
3 Community Mission of Hope
Housing Resource - Case Management Program
$ 6,969.61
$ 15,000.00
$ 7,271.03
4 Fair Housing Council of Riverside County
Comprehensive Fair Housing Program
$ 22,653.61
$ 25,000.00
$ 20,000.03
5 Hospice ofthe Valleys
Senior Assitance Program
$ -
$ 8,000.00
$ 7,271.03
6 Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center
Crisis Intervention & Supportive Services for Trauma
Survivors
$ 6,969.61
$ 10,000.00
$ 7,271.03
7 SAFE Family Jusitce Center
Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families Program
$ 6,969.61
$ 10,000.00
$ 7,271.03
8 Voices for Children
CASA Program
$ 6,969.61
$ 10,000.00
$ 7,271.03
9 City ofTemecula - Commmity Services
Dept.
Homeless Prevention & Diversion Pro gam
$ 20,154.98
$ 25,000.00
$ 12,500.06
Public Service Program Funds Recommended - Subtotal
$ 84,626.25
$ 133,000.00
$ 83,397.30
Housing Activities and Capital Improvement Projects
The City received one application for housing funds. The Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program proposes to provide three to five low-income households with home repair and maintenance services to keep homes affordable. The Finance Committee recommended funding Habitat for Humanity $50,000 from capital improvement funds. The Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program meets the ConPlan goal of "preserv[ing] the existing housing stock."
The Finance Committee recommended that the remainder of the CIP funds ($332,992.39) be allocated towards high priority accessibility projects in City parks and facilities, as identified in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. Financial allocations towards these projects satisfy the ConPlan goal of "provid[ing] greater access to public facilities and improvements for persons with disabilities."
FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan, the City of Temecula anticipates receiving approximately $557,586.09 through the CDBG program for 2022- 2023 and approximately $2.7 million through the duration of the consolidated plan cycle.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A - 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan
3. Notice of Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO.2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ANNUAL ACTION
PLAN (2022-2023), 2022-2026 FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED
PLAN, 2022 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR
HOUSING, AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN AS AN
APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING
UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM, INCLUDING THE
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
INCLUDING ANY AMENDED OR REVISED AMOUNTS
PROVIDED BY HUD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. The City of Temecula has participated directly within the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds since July 1, 2012; B. The City of Temecula has prepared all documents, notices, and forms required by HUD for participation in the CDBG Program by entitlement jurisdictions; C. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 on June 14, 2011, initiating the City to obtain entitlement community status from HUD, and authorized the Director of Community Development to prepare and return for City Council approval all documents required for the designation as an Entitlement City, including the Five -Year Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, and the Citizen Participation Plan;
D. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-43 on June 28, 2016, approving the updated Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of its Five -Year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds;
E. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-57 on September 23, 2016, approving the 2017-21 Assessment of Fair Housing;
F. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-24 on April 25, 2017, approving the 2017-21 Five -Year Consolidated Plan and 2017-18 Annual Action Plan;
G. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-28 on April 24, 2018, approving the 2018-19 Annual Action Plan;
H. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-25 on April 23, 2019, approving the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan;
I. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-25 on April 28, 2020, approving the 2020-21 Annual Action Plan;
J. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-21 on April 27, 2021, approving the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan;
K. The City of Temecula has prepared an Annual Action Plan to implement the first year of the Five -Year Consolidated Plan;
L. The Annual Action Plan includes HUD anticipated entitlement funding and the proposed use of Federal CDBG funds for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2022-23 with recommendations made by the City's Finance Subcommittee using the budget from the 2021-2022 program year as HUD has not yet determined and released 2022-23 funding allocations; M. The Annual Action Plan is required by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and must be approved by that agency for the City to receive federal CDBG funds each year.
N. The 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by Federal, State, and local law; O. The Five -Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan are required by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and must be approved by that agency for the City to receive federal CDBG funds each year.
P. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan, and on April 26, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Q. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council approved the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. Pursuant to Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Part 91 Consolidated Submissions For Community Planning And Development Programs (24 CFR Part 91) each entitlement jurisdiction must adopt a Five-year Consolidated Plan that states its overall plan to develop a viable urban community by providing for decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate -income persons, and prepare an Annual Action Plan each year describing the activities the jurisdiction will undertake during the next year to address those five-year priority needs and objectives; B. The City Council must adopt a plan that serves the following functions:
1. A planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders; jurisdictions;
2. A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for
3. A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and
4. A management tool for assessing performance and tracking results.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed action on the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan is exempt from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pursuant to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and specifically 24 CFR 58.34(a)(1) because the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan is a resource identification study and the development of plans and strategies for the prioritization and funding of proposed programs through CDBG and the proposed action involves the feasibility and planning studies to determine prioritization and CDBG funding to begin the development of certain projects. The potential projects discussed in the proposed actions that might involve physical activity will be reviewed under NEPA or the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the development of those projects. The proposed action is also exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 and 15378(b)(4).
Section 4. Approvals.
A. The City Council hereby approves the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan, set forth as Exhibit A attached hereto, and any and all other documents deemed necessary by HUD to obtain the annual CDBG allocation of the federal CDBG funds and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or his designee, to serve as the Certifying Officer for all environmental review procedures associated with the various CDBG projects, and Certifying Officer for the purpose of signing correspondence, agreements, and other required documents. The City Council also approves authorizes the City Manager or his designee to make minor or substantial changes the
above documents as deemed necessary by HUD, or as identified as "amendments" within the City's approved Citizen Participation Plan.
B The City Council hereby approves an application for CDBG Entitlement funds in the total amount of $557,586.06; which consists of the allocation of the CDBG current year program administration of $111,196.40; and consists of the allocation of the CDBG current year program activities of $446,389.66;
Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of April, 2022.
Matt Rahn, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Consolidated Plan
FY 2022-2026
Annual Action Plan
FY 2022-2023 M 0 G
A .... i.te.. Inc
This page is intentionally left blank.
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
Matt Rahn
Mayor
Zak Schwank
Mayor Pro Tem
Maryann Edwards
Councilmember
James "Stew" Stewart
Councilmember
Jessica Alexander
Councilmember
This page is intentionally left blank.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecutiveSummary..................................................................................................................................................1 ES-05 Executive Summaryf.........................................................................................................................1 TheProcess...............................................................................................
R
pr-05 lead & responsible agencies - 91.200(B)................................................................................6 PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I)................7 PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c).....................................51 NeedsAssessment.................................................................................................................................................56 NA -OS Overview..............................................................................................................................................56 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment.....................................................................................................58 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems.............................................76 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems ...........................87 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens...................................94 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion..............................................................96 NA-35 Public Housing.................................................................................................................................99 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment..............................................................................................104 NA-45 Non -Homeless Special Needs Assessment..................................................................110 NA -SO Non -Housing Community Development Needs......................................................116 HousingMarket Analysis..................................................................................................................................122 MA -OS Overview............................................................................................................................................122 MA-10 Number of Housing Units.......................................................................................................124 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing...................................................................129 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing-91.210(a)..............................134 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing.................................................................................................141 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services.......................................................................................143 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services..............................................................................147 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing............................................................................................151 MA-45 Non -Housing Community Development Assets.....................................................152 MA -SO Needs and Market Analysis Discussion.........................................................................160 TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ii
MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate -Income Households......................................................................................................................................................16S MA-65 Hazard Mitigation........................................................................................................................168 StrategicPlan..........................................................................................................................................................170 SP-OS Overview.............................................................................................................................................170 SP-10 Geographic Priorities...................................................................................................................173 SP-25 Priority Needs...................................................................................................................................174 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions............................................................................................179 SP-35 Anticipated Resources...............................................................................................................180 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure............................................................................................183 SP-45 Goals Summary..............................................................................................................................187 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement..........................................................190 SP-SS Barriers to Affordable Housing..............................................................................................191 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy.............................................................................................................193 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards.......................................................................................................196 SP-70 Anti -Poverty Strategy.................................................................................................................198 SP-80 Monitoring........................................................................................................................................200 2022-2023 Action Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 202
AP-15 Expected Resources....................................................................................................................202 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives...............................................................................................204 AP-35 Projects...............................................................................................................................................207 AP-38 Project Summary.........................................................................................................................208 AP-50 Geographic Distribution...........................................................................................................213 AP -SS Affordable Housing......................................................................................................................214 . AP-60 Public Housing.............................................................................................................................216 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities............................................................217 AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing............................................................................................220 AP-85 Other Actions...................................................................................................................................222 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements........................................................................................225 TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN iii
Executive Summary
ES-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYF
Introduction
Since its incorporation in 1989, the City of Temecula has grown from a small community of about 27,000 people to a City of over 110,000 residents in 2020.
Temecula identifies as the "heart of southern California wine country." Residents and visitors appreciate Temecula's open and agricultural spaces and arts, dining, and entertainment. For most of the City's history, Temecula has served as an affordable enclave for residents of Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego Counties. Unfortunately, decades of housing underproduction on a state and regional level have resulted in statewide, regional, and local housing market pressure. Housing costs have increased at a faster pace than median income for the last 10 years. It is challenging to find affordable housing in Temecula.
The City of Temecula has prepared the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan (Consolidated Plan) as required to receive federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), funds. The Consolidated Plan provides the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a comprehensive assessment of the City's housing and community development needs and outlines the City's priorities, objectives, and strategies for the investment of CDBG funds to address these needs over the next five years, beginning July1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026.
The City receives CDBG funds from HUD on a formula basis each year, and in turn, awards grants, and loans to nonprofit, for -profit or public organizations for programs and projects in furtherance of this Plan. These programs provide for a wide range of eligible activities to address the needs of Temecula residents.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program with three primary objectives against which HUD evaluates the Consolidated Plan and the City's performance. Those primary objectives are decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities for low- and moderate - income persons. The CDBG regulations require that each activity meet one of the following national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate -income persons; or
• Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or • Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency (usually the result of a natural disaster).
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 1
2022-2023 CDBG Public Service Activities
Assistance League of Temecula Valley, Operation School Bell $7,271
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County, Before & After School Care $7,271
Community Mission of Hope, Housing Resource Case Mgmt
$7,271
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Fair Housing Services $20,000
Hospice of the Valleys, Senior Assistance Program
$7,271
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Crisis Intervention & Supportive Services for Trauma Survivors
$7,271
SAFE Family Justice Center, Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families $7,271
Voices for Children, CASA Program
$7,271
City of Temecula - Homeless Prevention & Diversion Program. $12,500
2022-2023 CDBG Capital Activities
Critical Home Repair & Maintenance Program $50,000
ADA Transition Plan Implementation $332,992
2022-2023 Program Administration Activities
CDBG Program Administration $111,196
Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan needs assessment Overview
The priority needs and goals identified in the Plan needs assessment are based on analysis of information including the results of the City's surveys of residents and stakeholders and the housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite). Data supplied by HUD includes the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same time. Other sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to children, families, elderly persons, and persons with special needs throughout the community.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Plan:
• Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure • Preserve the existing housing stock
• Provide public services for low- and moderate -income, special needs, seniors, and veteran residents.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2
• Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Promote development of affordable housing
Consistent with HUD's national goals for the CDBG program to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG, funded activities aligned with the following measurable goals included in the Strategic Plan section of this Plan
Goal Name
Category
Need(s) Addressed
Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Public facilities
Non -Housing
Improve
Public facility or
and
Community
neighborhoods, public
infrastructure
infrastructure
Development
facilities, and
activities other than
improvements
infrastructure
low -/moderate -
income housing
benefit: 20,000
people assisted
2. Affordable
Affordable
Promote
Rental units
Housing
Housing
development of
constructed 80
Development
affordable housing
housing units
3. Housing
Affordable
Preserve the existing
Homeowner
Preservation
Housing
housing stock
housing rehabbed
30 households
4. Services for low-
Public Services
Provide public services
Public service
and moderate-
for low- and
activities other than
income residents
moderate -income,
low -/moderate -
special needs, seniors,
income housing
and veteran residents
benefit 2,000 people
assisted
S.
Services for
Public Services
Provide public services
Public service
residents with
for low- and
activities other than
special needs,
moderate -income,
low -/moderate -
including seniors
special needs, seniors,
income housing
and veterans
and veteran residents
benefit: 375 people
assisted
6. Services for the
Homeless
Provide public services
Public service
homeless and
for the homeless and
activities other than
those at risk of
those at risk of
low -/moderate -
homelessness
homelessness
income housing
benefit: 325 people
assisted
Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 3
Evaluation of past performance
The investment of HUD resources during the 2017-2021 Program Years resulted in measurable accomplishments that contributed to positive outcomes for Temecula residents. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City of Temecula and its partners to:
• Promote the development of affordable housing
• Preserve the existing housing stock
• Ensure equal access to housing opportunities
• Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents • Provide public services for residents with special needs • Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Provide public services for seniors and veterans
• Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure • Promote economic opportunity
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 provide the citizen participation and consultation requirements for the development of the Consolidated Plan. Chief among those requirements is the need to consult with the Continuum of Care (CoC) to address homelessness, Public Housing Authorities (PHA), business leaders, civic leaders and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low-income individuals and families, homeless individuals and families, youth and/or other persons with special needs. Information supplied by these community stakeholders, together with the data supplied by HUD resulted in a well-informed planning document that reflects the housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for the City of Temecula over the next five years.
In accordance with the City's Citizen Participation Plan, residents and stakeholders were able to participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan through surveys, community meetings and public hearings. Efforts were made to encourage participation by low- and moderate -income persons, particularly those living in areas where HUD funds are proposed to be used, and by residents of predominantly low - and moderate -income neighborhoods. Efforts were made to encourage the participation of minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities. The consultation process included representatives of the CoC, PHA, and other specified groups who completed surveys, provided local data, and assisted the City to ensure practical coordination of strategies to maximize impact and to avoid duplication of effort.
Summary of public comments
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 4
A total of four Community meetings to discuss the housing and community development needs in Temecula. The first series of meetings were held in person on October 27, 2021, at 8 am and 6 pm at the Temecula Community Center. This location was selected to facilitate access to the entire community. The resident survey was released at this time and closed on January 14, 2022. The second series of meetings were held virtually via Zoom on December 17, 2021, at 9 am and 5 pm.
The City of Temecula has not received any written comments at this point in the Consolidated Planning process.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
The City of Temecula has not received any written comments at this point in the Consolidated Planning process.
Summary
The City of Temecula's 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan is based on examination of a wide range of reliable sources, including 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5- Year Estimates and the 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data provided by HUD's HUD's eConPlanning Suite, independently sourced 2013-2017 CHAS data, more recent ACS data, data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Centers of Disease Control and other federal sources, as well as publicly available data from privately held sources such as Zumper, a rent aggregator, Zillow, a real estate platform, and local data. Quantitative data analysis together with consultation with citizens and stakeholders revealed four high priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated $2,8 million of CDBG funds over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan. The investment of CDBG funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by five goals of the Strategic Plan. Activities submitted for consideration in response to any solicitation or Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) process must conform with one of the nine Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action -oriented, measurable goals to receive consideration for CDBG funding.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 5
The Process
PR-05 LEAD & RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES - 91.200(B)
1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source
The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
Agency Role
Name
Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator
TEMECULA
Community Development
Department
Table 2- Responsible Agencies
Narrative
The Community Development Department is the lead department responsible for the administration of the CDBG program. The City contracted with MDG Associates, Inc. to prepare the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
In the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City implemented a comprehensive citizen participation and consultation process and conducted a needs assessment and market analysis to identify levels of relative need regarding affordable housing, homelessness, special needs, and community development. This information was gathered through consultation with public officials and local agencies, public outreach and community meetings, review of demographic and economic data, and housing market analysis.
In the implementation of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual Action Plans, the Community Development Department shall be responsible for all grant planning, management, and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy.
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Brandon Rabidou
Senior Management Analyst
City of Temecula
(951) 506-5142
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 6
PR-10 CONSULTATION - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(B),
91.300(B), 91.215(L) AND 91.315(L)
1. Introduction
In preparing the Consolidated Plan, the City of Temecula consulted with representatives from multiple agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the development of affordable housing, creation of job opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, and the provision of services to children, seniors, persons with special needs, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons.
To facilitate this consultation, the City solicited feedback through the following methods:
• Stakeholder surveys (web -based and paper -surveys)
• Individual stakeholder consultations
• Community meetings
• Public hearings
• Receipt of written comments
To gather the greatest depth of information, the City consulted with a wide variety of agencies, groups and organizations concerning the housing, community, and economic development needs of the community. The primary agencies, groups or organizations consulted can be found on the following pages. The input received from these consultation partners helped establish the objectives and goals described in the Strategic Plan.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies (91.215(1)).
The City recognizes the importance of coordination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result, during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted closely with organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community - focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys and invitations to community meetings and follow-up in -person interviews where appropriate.
The City further recognizes the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the upcoming five-year planning period with these organizations and agencies. The City will strengthen relationships and alignment among these organizations in the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds and through technical assistance. The City monitors its affordable housing units everyyear to ensure compliance with State and Federal requirements, supports the County's TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 7
Section 8 program and participates in the County's Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness The Continuum of Care of Riverside County (CoC) guides the development of homeless strategies and the implementation of programs to end homelessness throughout the region. The CoC is comprised of a network of public, private, faith - based, for -profit, and nonprofit service providers who utilize several federal, state and local resources in providing services for homeless persons. The County and its cities, including the City of Temecula, also provide resources for services that assist the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. The nonprofit and faith -based community plays a key role in the current CoC system. Hundreds of agencies throughout the County provide programs ranging from feeding the homeless on the street to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are available to homeless families with children as well as single men and women. The nonprofit and faith -based community also serves special needs populations, such as victims of domestic violence, veterans, persons with disabilities and unaccompanied youth.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The City is not a direct recipient of ESG funding. However, it is a participating jurisdiction in the COC and works closely with the homeless system to create funding policies and procedures for ESG.
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities 1 Agency/Group/Organization
Fund Development
Agency/Group/Organization Type
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 8
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
2 Agency/Group/Organization
Amcal Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
3 Agency/Group/Organization
Assistance League of Temecula
Valley
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Children
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs -
addressed by Consultation?
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
4 Agency/Group/Organization
Atria Senior Living
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Homeless
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
S
Agency/Group/Organization
Autism Society Inland Empire
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Health
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
6 Agency/Group/Organization
Boys and Girls Club of Southwest
County
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Children
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 10
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs -
addressed by Consultation?
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
7 Agency/Group/Organization
Bridge Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
8 Agency/Group/Organization
Building Industry Association
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Housing
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 11
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
9 Agency/Group/Organization
California Apartment Association
Inland Empire
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 12
10 Agency/Group/Organization
California State University San
Marcos, Temecula
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Education
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
11 Agency/Group/Organization
Canine Support Teams
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
12 Agency/Group/Organization
Catholic Charities
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Social Services
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Strategy
addressed by Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 13
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
13 Agency/Group/Organization
Chemo Buddies 4 Life
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Health Agency
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
14 Agency/Group/Organization
Circle of Care Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Homeless
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 14
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
15 Agency/Group/Organization
City of Murrieta
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Adjacent City
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Lead -based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
16 Agency/Group/Organization
CityNet
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Homeless provider
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 15
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
17 Agency/Group/Organization
City of Temecula
Agency/Group/Organization Type
City; Community Services
Commission; Planning Commission;
Public Safety Traffic Commission;
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Lead -based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 16
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
18 Agency/Group/Organization
Coachella Valley Housing Coalition
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
19 Agency/Group/Organization
Community Access Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services- Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 17
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
20 Agency/Group/Organization
Community Mission of Hope
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Homeless provider
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
21 Agency/Group/Organization
Comprehensive Autism Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services- Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 18
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
22 Agency/Group/Organization
County of Riverside Behavioral
Health Department
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Mental Health Agency/Facility
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
23 Agency/Group/Organization
County of Riverside Economic
Development Agency
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Local Government
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 19
24 Agency/Group/Organization
County of Riverside Health
Department
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Health Services, Childhood Lead
Poisoning Prevention Program
What section of the Plan was
Lead -based Paint Strategy
addressed by Consultation?
Non -Homeless Special Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
2S
Agency/Group/Organization
Court Appointed Special Advocate of
Riverside County
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Unaccompanied Youth
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs -
addressed by Consultation?
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
26 Agency/Group/Organization
Desert AIDS
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services-HIV/AIDS
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 20
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
27 Agency/Group/Organization
Economic Development of
Southwest California
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Employment
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
28 Agency/Group/Organization
Fair Housing Counsel of Riverside
County, Inc.
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 21
29 Agency/Group/Organization
Foothill AIDS
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Al DS
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
30 Agency/Group/Organization
Go Bananas
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Supporting families with special
needs
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
31 Agency/Group/Organization
GRID Alternatives
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Affordable Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 22
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
32 Agency/Group/Organization
Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Affordable Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
33 Agency/Group/Organization
Hitzke Consulting
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Affordable Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 23
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
34 Agency/Group/Organization
Hospice of the Valleys
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Healthcare
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
3S
Agency/Group/Organization
Housing Authority of the County of
Riverside
Agency/Group/Organization Type
PHA
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 24
36 Agency/Group/Organization
Iglesia Bautista del Valle de
Temecula
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Homeless
What section of the Plan was
Public Housing Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
37 Agency/Group/Organization
Inland Regional Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
38 Agency/Group/Organization
John Stewart Company
Agency/Croup/Organization Type
Affordable Housing
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2S
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
39 Agency/Group/Organization
Ken Follis
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Business Community
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
40 Agency/Group/Organization
League of Women Voters
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Non profit
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 26
41 Agency/Group/Organization
Love of Christ Fellowship Church
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
42 Agency/Group/Organization
Michelle's Place
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Health Agency
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
43 Agency/Group/Organization
Mission Village Apartments
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 27
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
44 Agency/Group/Organization
Mt San Jacinto College
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Education
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
4S
Agency/Group/Organization
Nu -Way International Christian
Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
46 Agency/Group/Organization
Our Nicholas Foundation
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Persons with Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 28
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
47 Agency/Group/Organization
Path of Life Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Homeless
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
48 Agency/Group/Organization
Pechanga Casino
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Employer
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 29
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
49 Agency/Group/Organization
Project Touch
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Homeless provider
What section of the Plan was
Public Housing Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
50 Agency/Group/Organization
Rancho California Water District
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Water District/Agency
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 30
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
51 Agency/Group/Organization
Rancho Community Church
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
52 Agency/Group/Organization
Rancho Damacitas
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Foster Youth
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs -
addressed by Consultation?
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
53 Agency/Group/Organization
Rancho en Espanol
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Faith Based
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 31
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
54 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverbank Village Apartments
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Rental Property
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
55 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Victims of Domestic
Violence
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 32
56 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverside City and County CoC
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Continuum of Care
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
TE M ECU LA 2022-2026
Agency/Group/Organization
CONSOLIDATED PLAN 33
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
57 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverside County Office on Aging
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Senior services
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
58 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverside County Sheriff
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Public Safety
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
59 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverside Transit Agency
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Transportation
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 33
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
60 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverside County Veterans Services
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan was
Public Housing Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
61 Agency/Group/Organization
Rose Again Foundation
Agency/Croup/Organization Type
Child Welfare Agency
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs -
addressed by Consultation?
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 34
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
62 Agency/Group/Organization
SAFE Alternatives for Everyone
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Victims of Domestic
Violence
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
63 Agency/Group/Organization
Safety Research Associates, Inc
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Special needs and senior
housing
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
64 Agency/Croup/Organization
Senior Care Referral Specialists
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Seniors
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 3S
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
65 Agency/Group/Organization
Solari Enterprises
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Affordable Property Management
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Non -Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
66 Agency/Group/Organization
Southern California Council of
Governments
Agency/Group/Organization Type
State Government
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 36
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Lead -based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
67 Agency/Group/Organization
Southwest Riverside County
Association of Realtors
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Housing
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 37
68 Agency/Group/Organization
Southwest Workforce Development
Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Employment
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
69 Agency/Group/Organization
St. Catherine's Catholic Church
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
70 Agency/Group/Organization
State Council on Developmental
Disabilities
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Public Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 38
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
71 Agency/Group/Organization
State of California Department of
Housing and Community
Development
Agency/Group/Organization Type
State Government
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Lead -based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
72 Agency/Group/Organization
Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Homeless provider
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 39
What section of the Plan was
Public Housing Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
73 Agency/Group/Organization
Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Business Community
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
74 Agency/Group/Organization
Temecula Valley Historical Society
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 40
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
7S
Agency/Group/Organization
Temecula Valley Unified School
District
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services -Education
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
76 Agency/Group/Organization
Temecula Valley Union School
District Adult Transition Program
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Services Education
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 41
77 Agency/Group/Organization
Temecula Valley Winegrowers
Association
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
78 Agency/Group/Organization
The Center for Life Change
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Addictive Recovery
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
79 Agency/Group/Organization
Civic Leader
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Community Services Commission
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 42
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
80 Agency/Group/Organization
U.S. Vets Initiative
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Veterans Services
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
addressed by Consultation?
Non -Homeless Special Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
81 Agency/Group/Organization
VA Loma Linda Healthcare
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Health Agency
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
addressed by Consultation?
Non -Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 43
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
82 Agency/Group/Organization
Smart Moms
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Community Based
Organization
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
83 Agency/Group/Organization
Voice of Children
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Youth Services
What section of the Plan was
Homelessness Needs -
addressed by Consultation?
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
84 Agency/Croup/Organization
Wells Fargo
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Business Community
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 44
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
85 Agency/Group/Organization
Western Riverside Council of
Governments
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Other -Regional Government
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Lead -based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
86 Agency/Group/Organization
Birth Choice
Agency/Croup/Organization Type
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 45
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
87 Agency/Group/Organization
CA Emerging Technology Fund
(CETF)
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Organizations engaged in narrowing
the digital divide
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
88 Agency/Group/Organization
Spectrum Internet Provider
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Broadband ISP
What section of the Plan was
Economic Development
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 46
89 Agency/Group/Organization
FEMA
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Emergency Management Agency
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
90 Agency/Group/Organization
HUD Los Angeles Field Office
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Federal Government
What section of the Plan was
Housing Need Assessment
addressed by Consultation?
Lead -based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non -Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti -poverty Strategy
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 47
91 Agency/Group/Organization
Riverside County Emergency
Management Department
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Floodplain Management Agency
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
92 Agency/Group/Organization
BLM California Desert District
Agency/Group/Organization Type
Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
Non -Homeless Special Needs
addressed by Consultation?
Market Analysis
How was the
To obtain a comprehensive
Agency/Group/Organization
assessment of the needs and
consulted and what are the
priorities within the community, the
anticipated outcomes of the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation or areas for improved
consultation with residents, service
coordination?
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
Table 3- Agencies, groups, organizations who participated Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting
The City maintains a list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders that have expressed an interest in City's CDBG program and invited representatives from each entity to participate at multiple points in the planning process. All agencies were strongly encouraged to attend meetings and participate in surveys.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 48
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan
Name of Plan
Lead Organization
How do the goals of your
Strategic Plan overlap with the
goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care
Continuum of Care of
Strategic Plan goals are
Riverside County
consistent with Ten Year Strategy
to End Homelessness
Housing Elements
City of Temecula
Strategic Plan goals are
consistent with Housing Element
policies and goals
Assessment of Fair
City of Temecula
Strategic Plan goals are consistent
Housing
with Assessment of Fair Housing
2005 General Plan
City of Temecula
Strategic Plan goals are consistent
Update
with the General Plan policies and
goals
2030 Quality of Life
P) City of Temecula
Strategic Plan goals are consistent
Management Plan
with the QLMP policies and goals
(QLMP)
Table 4^ Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(I)) In the development of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, the City afforded the following public entities with the opportunity to provide input on the Consolidated Plan concerning the future implementation of project to address the Strategic Plan goals identified in section SP-45 of the Consolidated Plan:
• Housing Authority of the County of Riverside
• Regional Homeless Alliance
• Riverside County Continuum of Care
• Riverside County Department of Social Services
• Riverside County Office on Aging
• Riverside County Economic Development Agency
• Riverside County Health Department
• Riverside County Veterans Services
• Riverside County Behavioral Health Department
• Riverside County Sheriff's Department
• Riverside Transit Agency
• Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 49
• Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) • State of California Department of Housing and Community Development • State of California Department of Employment Development Department • State of California Council on Developmental Disabilities • Southwest Workforce Development Center
• Inland Regional Center
• U.S. Veterans Administration
• Temecula Valley Unified School District
• Mt. St. Jacinto College
• City of Murrieta
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 50
PR-15 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - 91.1059 91.1159 91.200(C) AND 91.300(C)
1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting In preparation for the Consolidated Plan the City followed the established processes of the Citizen Participation Plan to ensure broad community engagement. At each step the City worked to ensure low- and moderate -income residents, members of minority groups, agencies involved in the provision of services to these populations, and others who are directly impacted by the programs and activities supported by the Consolidated Plan programs had the opportunity to be actively involved. The Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan, Action Plan, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and the Assessment of Fair Housing are posted on the City website at: https://temecuIaca.gov/430/Citizen-Participation and a hard copy will be available for review in the City Community Development Department for 30 days from March 28 to April 26, 2022.
To assist in identification of priority needs citizens were engaged through community meetings, surveys, public hearings, and individual meetings. Participants received extensive information about the Consolidated Plan, citizen participation process, HUD requirements for an entitlement City, the amount of funding the City anticipates receiving and how those funds can be used by the City. Residents were given the opportunity to provide City staff with their input on the prioritization of community needs. Each of these efforts, including review of HUD Data and relevant policy documents, assisted the City in its goal setting efforts.
Publicly noticed meetings were held at different stages in the development of the Consolidated Plan. Early in the planning process two community meetings were held on October 27, 2021, at 8 am and 6 pm in person at the Temecula Community Center located at 28816 Pujol Street. Later in the planning process two additional meeting were held virtually via Zoom at 9 am and 5 pm. No written comments were received.
On October 27, 2021, the City opened it resident survey to afford citizens the greatest opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs of the City. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in their neighborhoods for various types of improvements which could potentially be addressed using CDBG funds. The electronic survey link was published in a newspaper of general circulation, on the City's website and across its social media platforms. Hard copies of the survey were available at the Community Development Department. The resident survey received 126 responses and the stakeholder survey received eight responses. A stakeholder survey of organizations serving Temecula TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 51
residents as well as those addressing regional needs was open from January 24 to 28, 2022. This survey received eight responses.
On February 22, 2022, the City of Temecula Finance Subcommittee conducted a public meeting to consider the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan strategies and goals and the CDBG funding recommendations for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The Finance Subcommittee performs in an advisory capacity to City staff and to the City Council concerning planning, implementing, and assessing CDBG programs and activities.
On March 27, 2022, the City published a notice in The Press -Enterprise newspaper providing the public a 30-day notice to review and comment on the draft 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan and draft 2022-2023 Action Plan.
Citizen Participation Outreach
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL
1 Newspaper
Non-
Published
No comments
No
N/A
Ad
targeted/
November 1S, 2021,
were received.
comments
broad
The Press-
were
community
Enterprise
received.
announcing two
English
Community
Speaking
Meetings to
receive input on
Non -English
the preparation of
Speaking -
the City's 2022-
Specify
2026 Consolidated
other
Plan and the 2022-
language:
2023 Action Plan.
Spanish and
Tagalog
2 Public
Non-
Publicly noticed
Residents in
No
N/A
Meeting
targeted/
Community
attendance
comments
broad
Meeting on
received a
were
community
October 27, 2021, at
presentation on
received.
8:00 a.m. and 6:00
the Consolidated
p.m. at the
Plan and
Temecula
discussed housing
Community
and community
Center, 28816 Pujol
development
Street, Temecula,
needs with City
CA.
Staff.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN S2
Mode of
Target of
Summary of
Summary of
Summary
URL
Outreach
Outreach
response/
Comments
of
attendance
received
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
4 Internet
Non-
The Resident
The purpose of the
All survey
http
Outreach
targeted/br
Survey was
survey was to
responses
S fo
rms.
oad
available online
allow all residents
were
community
and in paper
the opportunity to
accepted.
offic
format at the
provide their
e.co
Community
assessment of the
m r
Development
level of need in
8DE
Department from
Temecula for a
MNr
November 15 to
variety of housing,
H5h
February 3, 2022.
community, and
L
The City advised
economic
residents and
development
stakeholders of the
activities.
availability of the
survey via
In total,126
newspaper of
residents
general circulation,
completed the
email, posting on
survey. A summary
the City website,
of all survey
Facebook, Twitter,
responses is
announcements at
provided in
City Council
Appendix B.
meetings, and
during the
Community
Meetings.
5 Newspaper
Non-
Published
No public
No public
N/A
Ad
targeted/
December 8, 2021,
comments were
comments
broad
in The Press-
received.
were
community
Enterprise
received.
announcing
English
Community
Speaking
Meeting to receive
input on the
Non -English
preparation of the
Speaking -
City's 2022-2026
Specify
Consolidated Plan
other
and the 2022-2023
language:
Action Plan.
Spanish and
Tagalog
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 53
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL
6 Public
Non-
Publicly noticed
No public
No public
N/A
Meeting
targeted/br
virtual Community
comments were
comments
oad
Meeting was held
received.
were
community
on December 17,
received.
2021, at 9:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. via
Zoom
7 Newspaper
Non-
Newspaper ad
No public
No public
N/A
Ad
targeted/
published on
comments were
comments
broad
March 28, 2022, in
received.
were
community
The Press-
received.
Enterprise
English
announcing the
Speaking
availability of the
draft 2022-2026
Non -English
Consolidated Plan,
Speaking -
draft 2022-2023
Specify
Annual Action
other
Plan, draft
language:
Temecula
Spanish and
Assessment of Fair
Tagalog
Housing, and
Citizen
Participation Plan
for a 30-day public
review and
comment period
to include a public
hearing before the
Temecula City
Council on April 26,
2022.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 54
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL
8 Public
Non-
Public hearing
To be determined.
To be
N/A
Hearing
targeted/br
before the
determined
oad
Temecula City
community
Council on April 26,
2022, to receive
comments on the
draft 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan,
draft 2022-2023
Annual Action
Plan, draft
Temecula
Assessment of Fair
Housing, and draft
Citizen
Participation Plan
prior to adoption
and submission to
HUD.
Table 5- Citizen Participation Outreach
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN SS
Needs Assessment
NA-05 OVERVIEW
Needs Assessment Overview
The Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment examines housing, homelessness, non -homeless special needs, and non -housing community development needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income, tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income, disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups and public housing needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population in Riverside County to inform the City's strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non - homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of people who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services. This population includes elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, and physically disabled persons, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of human trafficking, persons with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and victims of domestic violence. The non -housing community development needs assessment section discusses the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements and public services to benefit low- and moderate -income residents.
Methodology
To assess community needs, the City examined data, held community meetings, conducted a survey of residents and stakeholders, and consulted with experts and local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on the following sources of data:
• American Community Survey (ACS), (2013-2017, 5-year estimates) • Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) (2013-2017, 5-year estimates)
0 2020 Point -In -Time Homeless Count
The 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates and the 2013-2017, 5-year estimates were the most recent available complete datasets supplied through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Con Planning Suite planning framework.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 56
Consolidated Plan Survey for Residents and Stakeholders Temecula residents and stakeholders had the opportunity to respond to the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan survey to rate the need and/or to identify highest priority need for public facilities, infrastructure, and services, housing facilities and services, business services. The survey also provided insight into internet access, cost, type, and speed as well as disaster preparedness and experiences of discrimination in housing. The tabulation of survey results from the 126 Temecula residents and seven community stakeholders who responded to the survey are integrated throughout the Needs Assessment (NA) and Market Assessment (MA) of Consolidated Plan and can be found in the following sections:
• Housing facility and service results - NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment, • Public facility, infrastructure, and service results - NA -SO Non -Housing and Community Development Needs,
• Discrimination in housing results - MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing,
• Business service results - MA-45,
• Internet access, cost, type, and speed - MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low- and Moderate -Income Households, and • Disaster preparedness results - MA-65 Hazard Mitigation.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 57
NA-10 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Summary of Housing Needs
According to ACS data in Table 6, the City's population grew by 18 percent during the period between 2009 and 2017, increasing in number from 93,474 to 110,720 people. During this time, the number of households increased by 16 percent from 29,081 to 33,645 and the median household income increased from $79,640 to $87,115. According to the 2017 data, approximately 31 percent of all households in Temecula earn less than 100 percent of Area Median Income (AMI) and 23 percent of all households earn less than 80 percent of AMI.
Table 7 presents the number of different household types in the City for different levels of income. Small family households consist of two -to -four family members, while large family households have five or more persons. The income levels are divided by different AMI levels corresponding with HUD income definitions as follows:
0 0-30 percent AMI: extremely low-income - six percent of all households; • 30-50 percent AMI: low-income - seven percent of all households; • 50-80 percent AMI: moderate -income -10 percent of all households; • 80-100 percent AMI: medium -income - eight percent of all households; and
• Greater than 100 percent AMI: upper -income - 69 percent of all households.
SMALL FAMILY
*19%
Data Source:
HOUSEHOLDS EARNING 580% AMI,
LARGE FAMILY
*15%
AT LEAST ONE
CHILD 6 YEARS OLD
OR YOUNGER *
22%
Figure 1
2013-2017 CHAS
AT LEAST ONE
PERSON 62 YEARS
OF AGE OR OLDER
29 %
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 58
The most common household type in Temecula is small family, representing about 54 percent of all households in the City. From 16 to 29 percent of specific household types earn less than 80 percent AMI, with the highest rates of occurrence among households with one or more children 6 years of age or younger or 62 years of age or older.
<80% AMI HOUSEHOLDS WITH
SEVERE HOUSING PROBLEMS
RENTER
56%
Figure 2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Tables 8 and 9 delve into the tenure type and income range of households earning less than 100 percent of AMI and experiencing housing problems.
These tables demonstrate that housing cost burden is the greatest housing problem across renter and owner households. Renter households are most impacted by severe housing problems. Over 56 percent of the 7,600 households earning 0-80 percent AMI experience a housing cost burden over 50 percent of income (Table 8). The majority, 66 percent, of the 4,950 households earning 0-80% AMI with one or more severe housing problem are renters (Table 9). HUD defines four different housing problems as:
Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
3. Overcrowding / severe overcrowding: A household is overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 59
foyers, halls, or half -rooms. A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
4. Cost burden / severe cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
Table 12 shows that a relatively low percentage (less than three percent) of Temecula's households earning less than 100 percent of AMI are overcrowded.
Demographics
Base Year: 2009
Most Recent Year: 2017
% Change
Population
93,474
110,720
18%
Households
29,081
33,645
16%
Median Income
$79,640.00
$87,115.00
9%
Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year) Number of Households Table
0-30%
>30-50%
>50-80%
>80-100%
>100%
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
Total Households
1,880
2,210
3,510
2,765
23,280
Small Family Households
(2 - 4 people)
860
1,135
1,415
1,430
13,470
Large Family Households
(5 or more people)
115
150
525
385
3,645
Household contains at least
one person 62-74 years of age
370
335
710
470
4,560
Household contains at least
224
320
665
200
1,245
one -person age 75 or older
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or
299
455
595
480
4,400
younger
Table 7 - Total Households Table
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 60
Housing Needs Summary Tables
1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) Renter
Owner
0-
>30-
>50-
>80-
Total
0-
>30-
>50-
>80-
Total
30%
50%
80%
100%
30%
50%
80%
100%
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing -
Lacking
25 55
70 0
150
0 0
0 0
0 complete
plumbing or
kitchen facilities
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51 people
per room (and
0 15
50 35
100
0 4
0 0
4 complete
kitchen and
plumbing)
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per room
5o
115
175
20 360
50 0
15 65
130
(and none of the
above problems)
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50% of
975
1,000
730
150
2,855
395
455
770
215
1,835
income (and
none of the
above problems)
Housing cost
burden greater
than 30% of
65 175
375
750
1,365
65 95
430
760
1,350
income (and
none of the
above problems)
Zero/negative
Income (and
130
0 0
0 130
50 0
0 0
50 none of the
above problems)
Table 8 - Housing Problems Table
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 61
2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden)
Renter
Owner
0-
>30-
>SO-
>80-
Total
0-
>30-
>SO-
>80-
Total
30%
50%
80%
100%
30%
50%
80%
100%
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having 1 or more
of four housing
1,050
1,190
1,020
210
3,470
440
465
785
280
1,970
problems
Having none of
four housing
135
315
585
1,110
2,145
70 240
1,120
1,165
2,595
problems
Household has
negative income,
but none of the
130
0 0
0 130
50 0
0 0
50 other housing
problems
Table 9 - Housing Problems 2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
3. Cost Burden > 30%
Renter
Owner
0-30%
>30-
>so-
Total
0-30%
>30-
>so-
Total
AMI
50%
80%
AMI
50%
80%
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related
665
875
540
2,070
145
195
515
855
Large
100
90 330
520
15 60
150
225
Related
Elderly
295
150
185
630
200
275
465
940
Other
60 185
330
575
145
30 80
255
Total need by
1,110
1,300
1,385
3,795
505
560
1,210
2,275
income
Table 10 - Cost Burden > 30%
Data Source: 2013-201S CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 62
4. Cost Burden > 50%
Renter
Owner
0-30%
>30-
>so-
Total
0-30%
>30-
>50-
Total
AMI
50%
80%
AMI
50%
80%
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related (2
605
745
360
1,710
110
185
380
675
to 4 people)
Large Related (5
100
70 110
280
15 60
110
185
or more people)
Elderly
285
140
155
580
170
190
205
565
Other
60 145
190
395
145
30 80
255
Total need by
1,050
1,100
815
2,965
440
465
775
1,680
income
Table 11 - Cost Burden > 50%
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
S. Crowding (More than one person per room)
Renter
Owner
0-
>30-
>SO-
>80-
Total
0-
>30-
>SO-
>80-
Total
30%
50%
80%
100%
30%
50%
80%
100%
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single family
50 85
175
55 365
50 4
15 35
104
households
Multiple,
unrelated
0 0
55 0
55 0
0 0
30 30
family
households
Other, non -
family
0 45
0 0
45 0
0 0
0 0
households
Total need by
50 130
230
55 465
50 4
15 65
134
income
Table 12 - Crowding Information -1/2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 63
Renter
Owner
0-
>30-
>50-
>80-
Total
0-
>30-
>50-
>80-
Total
30%
50%
80%
100%
30%
50%
80%
100%
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
AMI
Households
with children
6 years of age
229
360
365
225
1,179
70 95
230
255
650
or younger
present
Table 13 - Households with children
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 64
Households with extremely low income and
Murriel, severe housing cost burden
City of Temecula
Legend
0.00%
0.97°/a
0.98°/a
- 2.8W/a
l
2.89°/a -
4.98%
Miles
4.999/,,
- 7.BYX
0 D.5 1 2 3 4
Data Credits; HUD CHAS 2013-2017. Service Layer Credits; Esri, HERE, Garmin, (cj
7.W/o
-11,26"A
Open StreetM a p contributors, and the 015 user community Figure 3: Extremely Low -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 65
I Murrieta
Households with low income and
severe housing cost burden
City of Temecula
Legend
= 0.29°%-1.25-A
1.26 °% - 3.27 °%
3.2B% - 4.89%
4.90% - 6.76°%
= 6.77°% - 11.31°%
ti
Miles
0 OS 1 2 3 4
Data C red its. HUD C HAS 2013-2017. Service Layer C red its: Es ri . HERE, Ga rm i n, (c) Open Street Map cant ributors. and the CIS user community Figure 4: Low -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 66
I Murrieta
Households with moderate income and
severe housing cost burden
City of Temecula
Legend
1.31 % - 1.93%
1.94% - 3.47%
3.48% - 4.73%
4.74% - 6.46-A
= 6.47% - 7.74%
1 Miles
O 0.5 1 2 3 4
Data C red its: H ll D C HAS 2013.2017. Service Layer C red its: Es ri ,HERE, Ca rm i n, (c) Open Street Map contributors, and the OIS user cvmmunity Figure 5: Moderate -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 67
LEVEL OF DEED FOR HOUSING
FACILITIES
AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING
SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING
SENIOR HOUSING
TRANSITIONAL AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING
MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING [CLUSTERED MULTI-
UNIT HOUSING COMPATIBLE WITH SINGLE-...
HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
LARGE FAMILY HOUSING
M
qW
0% 2U% 40% 60% 90%
HIGH NEED MODERATE NEED LOW NEED NO NEED NO OPINION
_1
100%
Figure 6: Resident Survey, Level of need for Housing Facilities The largest number respondents believe there is a high and moderate need for affordable rental housing, senior housing, and housing for persons with disabilities. Stakeholders agree the greatest need for housing is for the disables and veterans.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 68
HIGHEST PRIORITY HOUSING FACILITY
W
c
_
W
=m�
'<LA
0 m
W 0
Qw
u,
_
o
OJ uJ
ff ff
4 4
LL m
57 ff
u
4 0% 2a% 4G% 60% 90% 100%
Figure 7: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Housing Facility When asked to select one type of housing facility as the highest priority for the community the top three were affordable rental housing, single family housing, and senior housing.
Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.
According to ACS 2017, five-year estimates (table B25009), there are 5,029 single person households in the City, accounting for about 15 percent of the City's households. Approximately five percent of single householders are over 65 years of age, according to the ACS 2017, five-year estimates (table S1101), indicating approximately 95 percent of single person households are ages 18-64. Of the single person households, nearly 55 percent are homeowners and 45 percent are renters.
Taken together single person and small family households account for nearly 70 percent of the City's households.
According to Tables 10 and 11, 830 and 650 "other" households, respectively earn less than 80 percent ofAMI are housing cost burdened at a rate of30%and 50%of income.
The "other" category includes single person households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 69
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Nationwide, domestic violence, assault, and stalking are underreported according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Criminal Victimization, 2079, reports only 58 percent of all domestic violence events were reported to the police. The State of California Department of Justice maintains statistics on domestic violence calls to local law enforcement statewide by jurisdiction (open justice.doj.ca.gov). In 2020, the Temecula Police Department responded to a total of 213 calls related to domestic violence. Of these calls for assistance:
• 193 of these domestic incidents did not involve a weapon • 20 calls involved a weapon
o 0 domestic incidents involved a firearm
0 0 domestic incidents involved a knife or cutting instruments 0 3 domestic incidents involved other dangerous weapons 0 17 domestic incidents involved personal weapons (i.e., feet or hands) 0 0 cases involved strangulation
0 0 cases involved suffocation
It is difficult to estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance based on the data provided by state's Open Justice program. In households were physical violence occurred, it is possible that at least one member, possibly more include children, will need to relocate within the next five years to escape recurring violence.
Furthermore, according to the Riverside County Continuum of Care's 2020 Point in Time Count, 212 people experiencing homelessness reported being victims of domestic violence, and most those people (177) were unsheltered.
Victims of domestic violence suffer in many ways including economically which impacts access to safe and affordable permanent housing. Nationally, statewide, and in Temecula there is need for emergency shelter and affordable permanent housing.
What are the most common housing problems?
The most common housing problem in the City is cost burden, which affects 73 percent of households earning less than 80 percent of AMI, including 615 renter households and 590 owner households who pay more than 30 percent of their monthly gross income for housing costs. Within the group of cost burdened households, 4,325 are severely cost burdened households paying more than 50 percent of their monthly gross income for housing costs, including 2,705 renter households and 1,620 owner households. While severe housing cost burden is TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 70
experienced with similar frequency across renter and owner households, renter households bear the brunt of severe housing cost burden as well as the other housing problems.
HOUSEHOLDS WITH ONE HOUSING NEED
(AMOUNTS BELOW 5 ARE EXCLUDED)
cr
Li
jd
0 x
w
Z SO-SO% o 12, 3.40
w
Er -.
0%
1,520
2,705
20% 40% 60%
SUBSTANDARD HOUSING
615
590
90% 100%
0SEVERELY OVERCROWDED
OVERCROWDED HOUSING COST BURDEN > 5D% OF INCOME
a HOUSING COST BURDEN > 30% OF INCOME ■zEROfNEGATIVE INCOME Figure 8
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
The second most common housing problem in the City is housing overcrowding, which affects 474 low- and moderate -income Temecula households. Renter households make up 85 percent of the low- and moderate -income households who have more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half -rooms.
Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?
Renters earning less than 80 percent of AMI are most impacted by all housing problems. Only renter households live with substandard housing and severe overcrowding (Table 8), and more than two times as many renter households as owner households have less than or equal to zero income (Table 9).
On an absolute basis, small related, elderly, and other households earning 80 percent of AMI are most impacted by 30 percent and 50 percent housing cost burdens as summarized below:
• 30 percent cost burdened households
o Small related 2,925
o Elderly 1,570
o Other 830
• 50 percent cost burdened households
o Small related 2,385
o Elderly 1,145
o Other 650
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 71
Small and large related renter households earning 80 percent of AMI and experiencing housing cost burdens of 30 percent and 50 percent of AMI, relative to their groups, are impacted at concerning rates. According to Table 10, over 60 percent of low- and moderate -income small and large renter households experience a housing cost burden greater than 30 percent ofAMI. According to Table ll, 50 percent of low- and moderate -income small renter households are housing cost burdened greater than 50 percent of AM I.
Low- and moderate -income, single family renter households are most impacted by overcrowded housing conditions comprising 310 or 52 percent of the 410 total households affected by this housing problem in the same income category (Table 12).
Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re -housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, there are 1,395 households earning 0-80 percent of AMI, in Temecula with children six years of age or younger. Of those households, 970 are renters and 425 are homeowners. Approximately 23 percent of the households with children six years of age or younger earn less than or equal to 80 percent of AMI.
Of particular concern are the 750 extremely low-income households with children six years of age or younger, of which 590 are renters at risk of becoming homeless.
According to kidsdata.org, from 2014-2018, 8.4 percent of Temecula children, ages 0- 17, lived in crowded households. However, for the purposes of this analysis, the City considers overcrowding to be a secondary statistic to severe housing cost burden within the 0-30 percent of AMI extremely low-income bracket.
Across cost burdened households earning 0-80 percent of AMI, renter households are more impacted than owner households, and small related and elderly households are more impacted than large related or other household types. Within these groups, the risk of experiencing homelessness increases as AMI decreases. Among households earning 0-50 percent of AMI small, related renter household are more than four times as likely as small, related owner households to be 30 or 50 percent cost burdened (Tables 10 & 11). The number of elderly households earning less than or equal to 50 percent of AMI who are cost burdened varies little based on housing tenure (Tables 10 &11). Across households earning 0-50 percent AMI, 64 to 77 percent of small and large, renter households, are cost burdened (Tables 10 and 11).
According to Table seven, 754 (18 percent) of the 4,090 households earning less than 50 percent of AMI have one or more children six years old or younger.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 72
30-50% COST BURDENED
HOUSEHOLDS
ir
W
{50% Am
w
50% COST BURDENED
HOUSEHOLDS
If
2: C509'a AMI -75 I�S
O
w
<50% AM
w
im
0% 2D% 40% 6D% 90% 100%
■ SMALL RELATED LARGE RELATED ■ ELDERLY OTHER
Figure 10
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
As described in the Market Analysis, rental housing costs have risen steadily over the past five years - creating more pressure on extremely low-income households.
According to Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, the median rent for a one -bedroom TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 73
apartment rose from $1,476 in October 2017 to $2,109 in October 2021, an increase of 43 percent. This data is supported by research conducted for the City's 2021-2029 Housing Element, which based on analysis of Zillow.com and Apartments.com found rents for 1-bedroom units ranged from $1,345 to $2,850 in May 2021. Large increases, but not as great as for one -bedroom apartments, have occurred for two- and three - bedroom units. As rental prices continue to rise in Temecula, the pressure on extremely low-income households will continue to increase.
Rapid rehousing programs may help these homeless individuals or families but, near the termination of assistance, finding replacement housing is difficult for the same reasons it was difficult before becoming homeless: cost and an eviction record.
Unless a housing unit is within a subsidized development, formerly homeless families and individuals receiving rapid re -housing assistance nearing termination face considerable uncertainty with respect to their monthly housing costs and ability to remain housed at the end of the assistance contract.
If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at -risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates:
The assessment of at -risk populations described in the foregoing paragraphs is based on ACS and CHAS data in the Consolidated Plan using HUD definitions for household types and housing problems, supplemented by available local data for certain groups specified by HUD, such as households with children and victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness
According to Table 11, there are 2,150 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI that are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs. Of these households:
• 1,350 are small, related households with four or fewer members • 170 are large, related households with five or more members 425 are elderly households with one or more members over the age of 62 • 205 are other households
These extremely low- and low-income households are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
Discussion
Evaluation of ACS and CHAS data in Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics through Table 13 - Households with children above, the highest priority housing need exists for the development of additional rental housing units affordable to low- and moderate -income households. This is supported by residents' sentiment as seen in figures 6 and 7, indicating the need for affordable rental housing TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 74
is the greatest and highest priority in the City. According to Table 10 - Cost Burden > 30% 6,070 of households earning 0-80 percent of AMI are cost burdened— meaning those households pay more than 30 percent of income for housing costs. According to Table 11 - Cost Burden > 50%, 4,645 of cost burdened households are severely cost burdened— meaning they pay more than 50 percent of income for housing costs. Of the 4,645 severely cost burdened households, 2,965 are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter households, 2,150 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
The Strategic Plan addresses this priority need through the implementation of an affordable housing development goal. To the greatest extent feasible, assistance should be directed toward the development of units affordable to severely cost burdened renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI, and the subset of 1,050 extremely low-income renter households. Of these extremely low-income renter households, 605 are small, related households and 100 are elderly households the most at risk of homelessness.
The development of additional affordable rental housing will also address overcrowding — the second most prevalent housing problem — by increasing the supply of housing units that are appropriately sized to accommodate small families and single person households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 75
NA-15 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED:
HOUSING PROBLEMS
Introduction
Sections NA-15, NA-20, and NA-25 of the Needs Assessment examine housing problems experienced by racial or ethnic groups and identifies when a need is experienced at a disproportionately greater frequency. A disproportionately greater need exists when members of a racial or ethnic group in a certain income range experience housing problems at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than the rate of housing problems experienced by all households within that income level.
For example, when evaluating 0-30 percent of AMI households, if 50 percent of the households experience a housing problem, but 60 percent or more of households which identify as a particular racial or ethnic group of experience housing problems, that racial or ethnic group has a disproportionately greater need.
The housing problems identified in Tables 14-17 below are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than
1.01 people per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid bythe tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the 2013-2017 ACS (Table DP05), most Temecula residents identify White, followed by Asian, Some other race, Two or more races, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, and 72 percent of Temecula residents do not identify as Hispanic or Latino.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 76
1 %
Data Source:
Data Source:
1%
RACE ALONE (NOT HISPANIC)
ii WHITE
BLACK OR AFRICAN
AMERICAN
._AMERICAN INDIANAND
ALASKA NATIVE
ASIAN
■ NATIVE HA WAIIAN AND
OTHER PACIFIC
ISLANDER
*SOME OTHER RACE
■TWO OR MORE
Figure 11
2013-2017 ACS
ETHNICITY
HISPANIC
OR LATINO
24%
NOT
HISPANICOR
LATI N O
76%
Figure 12
2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 77
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Household has
Has one or
Has none of
no/negative
Housing Problems
more of four
the four
income, but
housing
housing
none of the
problems
problems
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
1,620
74 180
White
860
64 70
Black/African American
170
0 0
Asian
110
10 0
American Indian, Alaska Native
0 0
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
430
0 0
Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Household has
Has one or
Has none of
no/negative
Housing Problems
more of four
the four
income, but
housing
housing
none of the
problems
problems
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
1,920
285
0 White
110
175
0 Black/African American
105
0 0
Asian
100
70 0
American Indian, Alaska Native
55 0
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
510
35 0
Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 78
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Household has
Has one or
Has none of
no/negative
Housing Problems
more of four
the four
income, but
housing
housing
none of the
problems
problems
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
2610
900
0 White
1410
605
0 Black/African American
70 0
0 Asian
260
90 0
American Indian, Alaska Native
20 10
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
790
185
0 Table 16 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Household has
Has one or
Has none of
no/negative
Housing Problems
more of four
the four
income, but
housing
housing
none of the
problems
problems
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
2,000
765
0 White
1400
410
0 Black/African American
100
35 0
Asian
105
95 0
American Indian, Alaska Native
10 0
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
375
195
0 Table 17 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
The maps in Figure 13 to Figure 16 shown below illustrate the racial or ethnic composition of the City by Census Tract as reported in the 2013-2017 American Community Survey Estimates for those race and ethnicities that represent greater than one percent of the City's population.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 79
White alone (not Hispanic)
City of Temecula
.legend
36.02% - 40.27%
40.28% - 48.51%
48.52% - 53.65%
53.66% - 59.01%
= 59.02% - 68.86%
0 0.5 1 2 3
4 Miles
Data Cred its: ACS 2013-2017. Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Gar min, (c+ Open Street Map cant rib utars, and the GIS user community Figure 13: White alone (not Hispanic)
A
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 80
Black/African American alone (not Hispanic)
11- -f,,
City of Temecula
Legend
0.599b - 1.37%
138K - 3.66%
u 3.67% - 5.4B%
5.49% - 8.12%
= 3.13%-10.88%
a 0.s
4 Miles
Data Cred its: ACS 2013-2017, Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garrnin, (c) 4penStreatMap cnntributnrs, and the GIS user carnrnunity Figure 14: Black / African American
A
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 81
Asian alone (not Hispanic)
City of Temecula
Legend
3.89% - 4.84%
416% - 757%
7.58% - 9.43%
9.44% - 12.96%
= 12.97% - 18.53%
0.5 0
Miles
Data Cred its ACS 2013-2017. Service Layer Credits; Esri, HERE. Gar min. (0 Open5treet Map cc ntributors, and the GIS user community Figure 15: Asian
A
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 82
Hispanic origin (any race)
City of Temecula
Legend
16.55%-19.76%
19.77% - 22.67%
22.68% - 29.52%
2953% - 36.85%
= 36.86% - 43.78%
fl 0.5 1
4 Miles
Data Cred its; ACS 2013-2017. Service Layer Credits; Esri, HERE, Gar min, (cl Open Street Map contributors, and the CfS user community Figure 16: Hispanic
A
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 83
Discussion
The method of calculating disproportionate need, sets different groups of different sizes on equal footing, making it possible for any outsized impact on groupsto be identified. The analysis shows one or more racial and ethnic group is disproportionately impacted by one or more of four housing problems in all income levels. Furthermore, it shows 100 percent of Black/African American's earning 0-80 percent of AMI; 100% of Hispanic households earning 0-30 percent of AMI, 100% of American Indian, Alaska Natives earning 30-50 and 80- 100 percent of AMI have one or more of four housing problems.
Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of one or more housing problem relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category:
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
a30% AMI HOUSEHOLDS
100%
100%
gam, ,
$0%
60%
40%
20%
0%
WHITE BLACK/
AFRICAN
AMERICAN
� PERCENTAGE
Data Source:
0-30 percent of AM I:
• Black/African American, and
• Hispanic households.
54%
ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC
INDIAN, ISLANDER
ALASKA NATIVE
JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE 85%
Figure 17
2013-2017 CHAS
100%
HISPANIC
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 84
100% 5696
80%
60%
400A
20%
0%
WHITE
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
30-50%AMI HOUSEHOLDS
100%
100%
59%
BLACK /
ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC
AFRICAN
INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN
ALASKA NATIVE
PERCENTAGE
JURISDICTI0N AS A WHOLE 87%
Figure 18
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
30-50 percent of AM I:
• Black/African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
50-80%AMI HOUSEHOLDS
100%
109%
sos�
60%
40%
20%
5796
0%
E... ■ 0%
WHITE BLACK/ ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC HISPANIC
AFRICAN INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN A LASKA NATIV E
PERCENTAGE ==JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE 74%
Figure 19
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
50-80 percent of AM I: Black/African American households. 94%
HISPANIC
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 85
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
80-100%AMI
HOUSEHOLDS
100%
100%
77%
80%
74%
6095
53%
400A
20%
095
0%
WHITE
BLACK j ASIAN
AMERICAN PACIFIC
AFRICAN
INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN
ALASKA NATIVE
PERCENTAGE-JURISDICTI0N AS A WHOLE 72%
Figure 20
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
80-100 percent AM I:
• American Indian, and
• Alaska Native households.
66%
HISPANIC
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 86
NA-20 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED: SEVERE
HOUSING PROBLEMS
Introduction
Similar to the previous section, Table 18 - Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI Table 21 - Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI provide data to determine if disproportionate housing needs exist for any racial or ethnic group that experiences severe housing problems, which are defined as:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator.
2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern toilets.
3. Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
4. Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Household has
Has one or
Has none of
no/negative
Severe Housing Problems*
more of four
the four
income, but none
housing
housing
of the other
problems
problems
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
1490
205
180
White
835
90 70
Black/African American
150
25 0
Asian
100
20 85
American Indian, Alaska Native
0 0
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
365
6S
0 Table 18 - Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 87
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Household has
Has one or
Has none of
no/negative
Severe Housing Problems*
more of four
the four
income, but
housing
housing
none of the
problems
problems
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
1,655
555
0 White
960
325
0 Black/African American
105
0 0
Asian
95 80
0 American Indian, Alaska Native
55 0
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
405
140
0 Table 19 - Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Household has
Has one or
Has none of the
no/negative
Severe Housing Problems*
more of four
four housing
income, but
housing
problems
none of the
problems
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
1,805
1,705
0 White
885
1,135
0 Black/African American
70 0
0 Asian
155
185
0 American Indian, Alaska Native
20 10
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
610
365
0 Table 20 - Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 88
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Has one or
Has none of
Household has
no/negative
Severe Housing Problems*
more of four
the four
income, but none of
housing
housing
the other housing
problems
problems
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole
490
2,275
0 White
275
1,540
0 Black/African American
25 110
0 Asian
30 170
0 American Indian, Alaska Native
0 10
0 Pacific Islander
0 0
0 Hispanic
160
415
0 Table 21 - Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Discussion
The method of calculating disproportionate need, sets different groups of different sizes on equal footing, making it possible for any outsized impact on groups to be identified. The analysis shows Pacific Islanders are not impacted by severe housing problems and one or more racial or ethnic group is disproportionately impacted by one of four severe housing problems in all income levels except for extremely low-income households. Furthermore, it shows 100 percent of Black/ African American's earning 30-80 percent AMI; 100% of American Indian, Alaska Natives earning 30-50 have one or more of four severe housing problems.
Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing one or more severe housing problems:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 89
100%
80%
60%
4D%
20%
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
0-30%AMI HOUSEHOLDS
84% 96%
49%
&5%
6 °/a
■ 0% 0
WHITE BLACK/ ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC HISPANIC
AFRICAN INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN ALA5KA NATIVE
PERCENTAGE —JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE 79%
Figure 21
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Within extremely low-income (0-30 percent of AMI) households the high frequency of need is experienced similarly across White, Black/ African American, and Hispanic households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 90
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
30-50%AMI HOUSEHOLDS
1oc % 100%
100%
80%
60%
4D%
20%
6%
WHITE BLACK/ ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC HISPANIC
AFRICAN INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN ALA5KA NATIVE
PERCENTAGE JURISDICTI0N AS A WHOLE 75%
Figure 22
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
30-SO of percent AM I:
• Black/African American, and
• American Indian/Alaska Native households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 91
100%
80%
60%
44%
40%
20%
0%
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
50-80%AMI HOUSEHOLDS
100°b
67%
WHITE BLACK j
AFRICAN
AMERICAN
� PERCENTAGE
460A
ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC
INDIAN, ISLANDER
A LASKA NATIV E
•—JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE 51%
Figure 23
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
SO-80 of percent AM I:
• Black/African American,
• American Indian, Alaska Native, and
• Hispanic households.
53%
HISPANIC
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 92
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
80-100%AMI HOUSEHOLDS
16D%
RD%
4D%
2895
15%
199G
20%
1 a9G 095
6 i'a
WHITE BLACK/ ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC HISPANIC
AFRICAN INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN ALASKA NATIVE
PERCENTAGE -JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE 196
Figure 24
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Within in high -income (80-100 percent of AMI) households those which identify as Hispanic are disproportionately impacted.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 93
NA-25 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED:
HOUSING COST BURDENS
Introduction
HUD defines cost burden as the extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceeds 30 percent of a given household's gross income. A household is considered severely cost burdened if gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceeds 50 percent of a household's gross income.
Housing Cost Burden
50%
No / negative
income (not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole
21,025
7,065
5,380
175
White
13,480
4,235
3,080
70 Black/African American
990
415
320
0 Asian
1,960
370
390
85 American Indian, Alaska Native
115
30 75
0 Pacific Islander
25 0
0 0
Hispanic
3,990
1,870
1,360
0 Table 22 - Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Discussion
Based on this analysis, 21 percent of Temecula households experience a cost burden greater than 30-50 percent of income and 16 percent of households experience a cost burden greater than 50 percent of income. The following racial or ethnic group was found to have a disproportionately greater cost burden relative to the percentage of all households experiencing a cost burden or severe cost burden:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 94
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
30-50% COST BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS
3G%
26%
24%
20%
ZG% Elm
13% 14%
IG%
496
0%
WHITE BLACK f ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC HISPANIC
AFRICAN INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN ALASKA NATIVE
% WITH COST BURDEN JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE (21%)
Figure 25
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
No group is disproportionately impacted by a housing cost burden of 30 to 50 percent of income.
10%
0%
DISPROPORTIONATE NEED
>50% COST BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS
34%
0%
WHITE BLACK f ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC HISPANIC
AFRICAN INDIAN, ISLANDER
AMERICAN AIASKA NATIVE
I II % WITH SEVERE COST BURDEN JURISDICTION AS A WHOLE �15%) Figure 26
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Approximately 34 percent of American Indian, Alaska Native households are severely cost burdened at a rate of greater than 50 percent of income. 19%
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 95
NA-30 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED:
DISCUSSION
Are there any income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole?
The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing housing problems:
0-30 percent of AM I:
• Black/African American, and
• Hispanic households.
30-SO percent of AM I:
• Black/African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
SO-80 percent of AM I: Black/African American households. 80-100 percent of AMI: American Indian, Alaska Native households. 0-100 percent of AM I:
• Black/African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of severe housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing severe housing problems:
30-SO percent of AM I:
• Black/African American, and
• American Indian/Alaska Native households.
SO-80 of percent AM I
• American Indian, Alaska Native,
• Black/African American, and
• Hispanic households.
80-100 percent of AMI: Hispanic households.
0-100 percent AM I
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 96
• Black/African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
The following racial or ethnic groups had a disproportionately greater level of housing cost burden: 37 percent of Temecula households experience a cost burden greater than 30 percent of income, with 21 percent of households experiencing a cost burden between 30 and 50 percent of income, and 16 percent of households experiencing severe cost burden greater than 50 percent of income. American Indian, Alaska Native households are disproportionately impacted by housing cost burdens greater than 30 percent and greater than 50 percent of income.
If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs? No other housing needs for these specific racial or ethnic groups were identified through consultation with stakeholders or through citizen participation.
Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community?
Mapping of the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups and calculation of the Dissimilarity Index show various racial/ethnic groups are not located in specific areas or neighborhoods in Temecula. Maps of racial/ethnic distribution from 1990, 2000 and 2010, created by HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data Mapping tool, show the City has experienced high levels of residential integration for the past few decades. The Dissimilarity Index supports what is represented in the maps with values below20.Othrough 2010.
Temecula has low levels of segregation between White and Black, White, and Hispanic, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents.
While segregation in Temecula has increased over time as the population has become less White and more Hispanic, Temecula is still a well -integrated community compared to the state and metropolitan area. In 1990 the Hispanic population represented 14.5 percent of the population, by2017 it had increased to 27.6 percent, according to 2013-2017 ACS data. The Hispanic/White Dissimilarity Index increased from 0.6 in 1990 to 19.2 in 2017. For comparison, the Hispanic/White dissimilarity index in the Riverside metropolitan area was just below 40.
The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which two groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation), values TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 97
between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 98
NA-35 PUBLIC HOUSING
Introduction
Public housing and other assisted housing programs are part of the efforts by Riverside County to address the affordable housing needs of extremely low - and very low-income families in Temecula. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACK) oversees HUD public housing programs for participating jurisdictions, including Temecula.
HACK administers the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8), which provides rental assistance in all incorporated and unincorporated cities and areas of Riverside County. HACK provides affordable housing for low- income families, seniors, and disabled persons.
The mission of HACK is "to transform and promote healthy, thriving communities, re -ignite hope and restore human dignity through the creation and preservation of high quality and innovative housing and community development programs which enhance the quality of life and revitalize neighborhoods to foster self-sufficiency."
There are 184 units of assisted housing in Temecula,129 of which are Housing Choice Vouchers and 55 of which are Project Based Section 8. As of September 2021, 126 families including 83 of whom have disabilities and 55 of whom are elderly resided in Temecula and received public housing assistance. Residents may identifyas both disabled and elderly. These families occupied onethrough four -bedroom units.
Program Type
Vouchers
Public
Special Purpose Voucher
Housing
Veterans
Family
by
Mod -
Rehab
Certificate
Total
Project
Tenant
Program
Type
-based
-based
Affairs
Unification
Disabled*
Supportive
Housing
program
# of
units
79 456
8,748
36 8,364
135
178
19 vouchers
in use
Table 23 - Public Housing by Program Type
*includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 99
Program Type
Vouchers
Special Purpose
Characteristics
Voucher
of Public
Mod -
Certificate
Housing
Rehab
Total
Project
Tenant
Veterans
Residents
-based
-based
Affairs
Family
Supportive
Unification
rogram
Program
Average
Annual Income
12,664
13,261
13,870
10,805
10,850
13,465
14,983
Average length
of stay
6 4
6 2
6 0
5 Average
1 3
2 1
2 1
3 Household size
# Homeless at
admission
2 331
205
1 197
2 5
# of Elderly
Program
67 38
3,249
9 3,211
15 10
Participants
(>62)
# of Disabled
Families
12 70
2,587
26 2,422
82 33
# of Families
requesting
79 456
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
accessibility
features
# of HIV/AIDS
program
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 participants
# of DV victims
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Table 24 - Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source:
PIC (PIH Information Center)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 100
Program Type
Vouchers
Special Purpose Voucher
Race
Mod-
Rehab
Certificate
Total
Project
Tenant
Veterans
Family
-based
-based
Affairs
Unification
Disabled*
Supportive
Housing
Program
White
66 318
5,469
26 5,195
79 144
15 Black/African
10 126
2,967
8 2,867
55 29
3 American
Asian
1 9
209
2 203
0 2
1 American
Indian/Alaska
0 2
80 0
76 1
3 0
Native
Pacific
Islander
2 1
23 0
23 0
0 0
Other
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
*includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Table 25 - Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Program Type
Vouchers
Special Purpose Voucher
Ethnicity
Mod-
Rehab
Certificate
Total
Project
Tenant
Veterans
Family
-based
-based
Affairs
Unification
Disabled*
Supportive
Housing
Program
Hispanic
29 250
2,318
7 2,220
13 74
1 Not
50 206
6,430
29 6,144
122
104
19 Hispanic
*includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Table 26 - Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 101
Section SO4 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in any program or activity that is conducted by federal agencies or that receives financial assistance from a federal agency. A housing provider may not deny or refuse to sell or rent to a person with a disability and may not impose application or qualification criteria, rental fees, or sales prices and rental or sales terms or conditions that are different than those required of or provided to persons who are not disabled. Further, housing providers may not require persons with disabilities to live only on certain floors, or to all live in one section of the housing. Housing providers may not refuse to make repairs and may not limit or deny someone with a disability access to recreational and other public and common use facilities, parking privileges, cleaning or janitorial services or any services that are made available to other residents.
When possible, HACR fulfills reasonable accommodation requests. These include disabled access, desire to live near family and senior appropriate housing. In the past five years, HACR has awarded 2,587 vouchers, 70 certificates, and 12 mod -rehabs to disabled families to better serve disabled residents.
As of September 2021, HACR's waitlist consisted of 117,718 families, roughly six times as many small households are there were in Temecula in 2017. Of those families waiting for housing assistance from HACK 74 percent were extremely low-income, just over half (56 percent) of families on the waitlist have children, about12 percent are elderly, and 23 percent have disabilities. In Temecula there were 1,521 families on the waitlist, of which 272 have disabilities and 339 are elderly. The waitlist has been open since July 2015.
HACK takes the following steps proactively to serve the needs of disabled residents:
• Marketing HACR programs to all eligible persons, including persons with disabilities and persons with limited English proficiency. • Utilizing buildings and communications that facilitate service delivery to persons with disabilities. Application intake, office appointments, voucher/contract issuance, and informal hearings are all conducted in accessible office spaces. The Agency also provides home visits for appointments upon request as a reasonable accommodation. Sign language and Braille services are also available if necessary to service hearing and visually impaired persons.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 102
Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders
The most pressing need isthe high demand for affordable housing throughout Riverside County. This is documented by the long waitlist, which consists of 117,718 families, 74 percent of whom are extremely low-income, 66,337 of whom have children,13,860 of whom are elderly, and 27,572 of whole have disabilities.
How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large?
The needs experienced by HARC residents are like the needs of very low- income and low-income households throughout the City of Temecula.
Discussion
In the upcoming five years, HACR's goals and objectives are as follows:
• Goal: Expand the supply of assisted housing; Objective Increase housing choices for families and individuals
• Goal: Improve the quality of assisted housing; Objective: Maintain safe, decent, sanitary units and improve quality of life for residents living in assisted housing.
• Goal: Increase assisted housing choices; Objective: Encourage resident choice in rental selection
• Goal: Promote self-sufficiency within assisted housing programs; Objective: Promote economic independence for families and individuals • Goal: Ensure equal opportunity and affirmatively further fair housing; Objective: Promote equal housing opportunities
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 103
NA-40 HOMELESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Introduction
There are four federally defined categories under which individuals and families are considered homeless:
1) Literally Homeless -An individual or family:
a. Living unsheltered on the streets;
b. Living in a vehicle or other place not meant for habitation; c. Living in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program, including a motel/hotel paid by a charitable organization or government program; or d. Exiting an institution (resided 90 days or less and previously resided in one of the two items listed above).
2) Imminent Risk of Homelessness - An individual or family imminently losing their housing:
a. Housing will be lost within 14 days; and
b. Has no subsequent residence; and
c. Lacks the resources and support network.
3) Homeless Under other Federal Statutes -An unaccompanied youth under the age of 25 or families with children and youth, who do not otherwise qualify as homeless under this definition, but who do meet all of the following:
a. Are defined as homeless under Section 387 of the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 5732a), Section 637 of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9832), Section 41403 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C.14043e- 2), Section 330(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 2541o(h)), Section 3 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2012), Section 17(b) of the Child Nutrition Act of1966 (42 U.S.C.1786(b)), or Section 725 of the McKinney- Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.11434a);
b. Have not had a lease, ownership interest, or occupancy agreement in permanent housing at anytime during the 60 days immediately preceding the date of application for homeless assistance;
c. Have experienced persistent instability as measured by two or more moves during the 60-day period immediately preceding the date of applying for homeless assistance; and
d. Can be expected to continue in such status for an extended period of time because of chronic disabilities, chronic physical health or mental health conditions, substance addiction, histories of domestic violence or childhood abuse (including neglect), the presence of a child or youth with a disability, or two or more barriers to employment, which include the lack of a high school degree or General Education Development (GED), illiteracy, low English proficiency, a history of incarceration or detention for criminal activity, and a history of unstable employment.
4) Fleeing or Attempting to flee Domestic Violence -An individual or family:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 104
a. Fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence situation, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or other dangerous or life -threatening conditions that relate to violence against the individual or a family member; and b. Has no subsequent residence; and
c. Lacks the resources and support network.
According to the 2020 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, during the January Point -in Time Count, California had the highest rate of homelessness and unsheltered homelessness as well as the greatest increase in homelessness year over year in the county. Over one quarter of the nation's homeless population was in California, and more than half of all the nation's homeless individuals are concentrated in four states: California (28 percent), New York (16 percent), Texas (five percent), and Florida (five percent). The number of people experiencing homeless on a given night in California increased from 38 per 10,000 in 2019, to 41 per 10,000 in 2020.
The Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) is administered as a division of the County's Homelessness Prevention and Workforce Solutions (HHPWS) Department.
The CoC is a network of public and private sector homeless services providers which collaborates on regional approaches to strategy development and service delivery.
HHPWS is the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) lead for the Riverside County CoC.
Every year, the Riverside County CoC conducts a Point -in Time (PIT) Count, to create a census of unsheltered and sheltered individuals experiencing homelessness.
HOMELESSNESS BY ACE,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
3 r500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
590
0 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
UNDER 18 ■ AGE 18 TO 24 OVER 24
Figure 27
Data Source: 2013-2020 Riverside County COC Dat
2013
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 105
From 2014 to 2017 there was a brief reduction in the number of people experiencing homelessness in Riverside County, and by 2020 nearly all progress since 2013 had been lost. Since 2013, the rate of homelessness experienced by children under the age of 18 has dropped by 56 percent from 384 children to 170 children, while the rate of homelessness experience by transitionally aged children, those 18 to 25, has increase by 74 percent from 201 people to 349 people.
Most of the Point in Time data is collected at the County level and is presented as such in the tables below.
Homeless Needs Assessment Riverside County CoC Data (2020 Point in Time Count) Estimate the # of
persons experiencing
Estimate the
Estimate
Estimate
Estimate the #
homelessness on a
#
the #
the #
of days
Population
given night
experiencing
becoming
exiting
persons
homelessnes
homeless
homeless
experience
Unsheltere
s each year
each year
each year
homelessness
Sheltered
d
Persons in
households with
adult(s) and
218
23 child(ren)
Persons in
households with
11 13
only children
Persons in
households with
500
2,119
only adults
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Chronically
homeless
129
878
individuals
Chronically
homeless
3 1
families
Veterans
50 183
Unaccompanied
Child
11 13
Persons with
HIV/AIDS
8 46
Table 27 - Homeless Needs Assessment
Alternate Data Source Name:
Riverside County Homeless Count & Survey Report
Data Source: 2020 PIT Count
Indicate if the homeless population type: Has No Rural Homeless TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 106
If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth).
Data for the "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year" and the "number of days that people experience homelessness" is not readily available. A description of chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families and unaccompanied youth is below.
A Chronically Homeless Individual or Family is living in an emergency shelter or in an unsheltered location with a disabling condition and has been continuously homeless for a year or more or has had at least four episodes of homelessness in the past three years. Of those homeless people in Riverside County reported as chronically homeless, 129 were sheltered and 878 were unsheltered, included here were four families, three of which were sheltered and one which was not.
Families with children include at least one household member aged 18 or over and at least one household member under the age of 18. According to the PIT Count in Riverside County, there were 241 people in households with at least one adult and one child. Of these people 218 were living in emergency or transitional shelters and 23were unsheltered and in urgent need of housing assistance.
Veterans are persons who have served on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States. This does not include inactive military reserves or the National Guard unless the person was called to active duty. The PIT count revealed 50 veterans who were sheltered and homeless and 183 veterans who were unsheltered and homeless.
Unaccompanied youth, individuals under the age of 18 years old, are presumed to be emancipated if they are unsheltered without an adult. According to the PIT count, there were 24 unaccompanied youth who were homeless, consisting of 11 sheltered and 13 unsheltered people. Among unaccompanied transitionally aged youth, ages 18 to 24, who were homeless, 52 were sheltered and 277 unsheltered.
Further, the PIT count showed 54 homeless people with HIV/AIDS, including eight individuals who were sheltered and 46 who were unsheltered.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 107
Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional)
Race
Sheltered
Unsheltered (optional)
White
493
1,538
Black or African American
193
431
Asian
7 31
American Indian or Alaska Native
12 79
Pacific Islander
1 27
Ethnicity
Sheltered
Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic
287
750
Not Hispanic
442
1,405
Table 28 - Nature and Extent of Homelessness
Alternate Data Source Name:
Riverside County Homeless Count Report, 2020
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans.
According to the PIT Count in Riverside County, there were 72 households with at least one adult and one child, comprised of 64 households living in emergency or transitional shelters and eight households unsheltered and in urgent need of housing assistance. There was a total of five parenting youth, aged 18 to 24, and five children of parenting youth, under the age of 18, and all were sheltered.
The PIT count revealed 50 sheltered veterans and 183 unsheltered veterans. It is unclear how many unique families are represented in this number. In the universe of homeless families, it is not clear how many are families of deceased or estranged veterans.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group.
According to the PIT Count, an estimated 70 percent of homeless individuals were identified as White in terms of race and 64 percent of homeless individuals were identified as non -Hispanic in terms of ethnicity. The next largest unsheltered racial groups experiencing homelessness were Black/African American (22 percent) and American Indian/Alaska Native (3 percent).
According to the PIT Count 2,031 individuals were identified as White in terms of race, 24 percent of whom were sheltered; 1,847 homeless individuals were identified as non -Hispanic in terms of ethnicity, 24 percent of whom were sheltered. The next largest homeless racial groups include 624 people identified as Black/African American (31 percent sheltered) and 91 people identified as American Indian or Alaska Native (13 percent sheltered).
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 108
Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness.
Of the 2,155 people who are homeless and unsheltered, approximately 41 percent meet the definition of chronic homelessness, which is a person with a disabling condition who has been living in a place not meant for human habitation continuously for one year or on at least four occasions (totaling at least 12 months) over the past three years. Additionally, an estimated 35 percent of those unsheltered people face substance use issues, and nearly 29 percent have mental health issues.
Over eight percent have experienced domestic violence.
Of the 729 people who are sheltered, about 18 percent meet the definition of chronic homelessness, approximately 11 percent face substance use issues, about 25 percent have mental health issues, and an estimated five percent have experienced domestic violence.
Discussion
In consideration of the PIT Count results from January 2020 indicating on any given night in Riverside County, approximately 2,884 people are homeless, including 2,155 people who were homeless and unsheltered. The City considers homelessness prevention and rapid re -housing as high priority needs for the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan strategy.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 109
NA-45 NON -HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Introduction
Special needs populations consist of persons who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services and supportive housing. Persons with special needs include the elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and victims of domestic violence. The City of Temecula will consider allocating CDBG public services funding to programs that provide services to special needs populations; including but not limited to those serving the elderly, frail elderly, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, mentally disabled, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, victims of human trafficking and veterans with PTSD or other needs.
Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community.
Elderly and Frail Elderly
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines elderly as a person who is 62 years of age or older. A frail elderly person is an elderly person who is unable to perform at least three "activities of daily living" including eating, bathing, grooming or home management activities. Generally, elderly people have lower incomes than the population at large. Based on 2013-2017 CHAS data of the 9,099 households containing at least one elderly person in Temecula, nearly 29 percent (2,624 households) earn less than 80 percent of the AMI for Riverside County and may require public services to continue to live independently.
Persons with Disabilities
HUD defines a disabled person as having a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. The obstacle to independent living for these adults is not only their disability, but also the lack of financial resources, often related to limited employment. Additionally, personswith disabilities have high health care costs, are dependent on supportive services, and may require accessibility modificationsto accommodate their disability. Based on the 2017,1-yearACS estimate, of the total Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population age 18 and to 64 (67,915) in Temecula, an estimated 5,940 persons have a disability. Of these persons, over 55 percent are employed, and 42 percent are not in the labor force.
Alcohol and Other Drug Addictions
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) conducts the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) which measures use of illegal and prescription drugs, alcohol and tobacco and misuse of prescription drugs; substance use disorder and substance use treatment major depressive episodes and depression care; and, serious TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 110
psychological distress, mental illness, and mental health care among those aged 12 and above in the civilian noninstitutionalized population. In the NSDUH substate analysis, Riverside County is evaluated together with Imperial County in what is identified as Regions 13 and 19R. The percentages are based on annual averages from 2016, 2017 and 2018. The data shows an unmet need for treatment at a specialty facility in the last year for illicit drug use of almost three percent, alcohol use of almost six percent, and for substance use of nearly eight percent of the population. The survey also shows while nearly18 percent of the population reported any mental illness in the past year only about 12 percent received mental health services during the same period. There is an indicated need for improved access to mental health services and specialty treatment facilities.
HIV/AIDS
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a virus that weakens one's immune system by destroying important cells that fight diseases and infection. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final stage of HIV. The Center for Disease Control's (CDC) Atlas Plus program reported an estimated 10,400 persons living with HIV disease at the end of 2019 ( https://www.cdc.goy/nchhstp/atlas/index.htm , accessed October 2021). Of those people, 9,414 were HIV diagnosed, which includes 268 new diagnoses during thatyear. New HIV diagnoses (3S percent) were most concentrated among those 2S to 34 years of age. For persons living with HIV/AIDS, access to affordable housing, supportive services and quality health care is important to maintaining their health and well-being.
Victims of Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence includes, but is not limited to, felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse of the victim or by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim. In 2020, residents of Temecula made a total of 213 calls to law enforcement related to domestic violence(openiustice.doj.ca.gov, accessed September 2021). Of these calls:
• 193 of these domestic incidents did not involve a weapon • 20 calls involved a weapon
0 0 domestic incidents involved a firearm
0 0 domestic incidents involved a knife or cutting instruments 0 3 domestic incidents involved other dangerous weapons 0 17 domestic incidents involved personal weapons (i.e., feet or hands) 0 0 cases involved strangulation
o 0 cases involved suffocation
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ill
What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined?
To determine the level of need and types of services needed by special needs populations, the City conducted surveys, consulted with local service providers and reviewed ACS data. Supportive services required for special needs populations include case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, childcare, transportation, and job training provided for the purpose of facilitating a person's stability and independence.
In housing, accessibility modifications to accommodate persons with mobility disabilities may include, but are not limited to, wider doorways, no -step thresholds, installation of ramps, grab bars, lowered countertops, and accessible hardware. The needs of residents with sensory disabilities are different from those with mobility disabilities. Individuals with hearing disabilities may require visual adaptations for telephone ringers, doorbells, and smoke alarms. Residents who are blind may require tactile marking of changes in floor level and stair edges and braille markings on appliances and controls. People with low vision may require large print markings and displays, contrasting colors to distinguish changes in level or transition from one area to another, proper lighting, and reduced glare from lighting and windows.
For persons with special needs, the high cost of living in Riverside County makes it difficult to maintain a stable residence. Often these segments of the population rely on support services from various Riverside County nonprofit organizations to avoid becoming homeless or institutionalized.
Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area.
According to the CDC, at the end of 2019, an 1,059,784 people in the United States had HIV and 36,740 were newly diagnosed the same year (cdc.gov, accessed October 2021). In Riverside County 9,414 people had been diagnosed with HIV as of the end of 2019. CDC data show, the number of persons living with HIV in Riverside County has increased from 3,693 in 2009 to the 2019 figure of 9,446, marked by a steep increase of over 100 percent beginning in 2016, and continuing through the last data point. Of those with knowledge of their status 85 percent were in receipt of medical care and 78 percent had reached viral suppression. Viral load is an indicator of health and adherence to medication. A high viral load is indicative of illness. Viral load suppression (less than 200 copies/ml) is suggestive of improved health.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 112
10,000
9 ,000
8 ,000
7,000
6,000
5 ,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
HIV PREVALENCE,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
2009 200E 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201E 2019 Figure 28
Data Source: 2008-2019, Centers for Disease Control, Atlas Plus Data In 2019, there were a reported 268 new HIV diagnoses in Riverside County. People aged 25 to 34 accounted for just over 35 percent, the greatest concentration, of new cases. Of the newly diagnosed 88 percent were male, 12 percent were female; 51 percent were Hispanic, 28 percent were White,14 percent were African American, and three percent were Asian. The data was suppressed for those identifying as American Indian/ Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander, and Multiple Races because the number were deemed low enough to threaten individual anonymity.
Furthermore, 80 percent of new diagnoses had been linked to care.
Discussion
In addition to the elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol and other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and victims of domestic violence described above, two other subpopulations with special needs in Riverside County include victims of human trafficking and individuals with PTSD.
Victims of Human Trafficking
Human trafficking is a crime that involves the forceful, fraudulent, or coercive methods of entrapping a person, real or perceived, to exploit them for financial gain.
The exploitative nature can come in the form of labor services, involuntary servitude, enslavement, debt bondage or commercial sex acts. Human trafficking is extremely difficult to track; there is no recent or reliable prevalence rate to report. Between 2015 and 2019, the National Human Trafficking Hotline received the most calls from California, of all 50 states ( https://humantraffickinghotline.org/ accessed October 2021). Of national cases reported to the hotline the majority were sex trafficking, adult, and women.
The United States, Department of State's2027 Trafficking in Persons Report published in June 2021, reports victims of human trafficking found in every state in the country TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 113
and victims trafficked from every country in the world. Victims of human trafficking in the United States are most frequently trafficked from within the United States, Mexico, and Honduras. Trafficking in Persons reports individuals most vulnerable to human trafficking "include: children in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, including foster care; runaway and homeless youth; unaccompanied children; individuals seeking asylum; American Indians and Alaska Natives, particularly women and girls; individuals with substance use issues; migrant laborers, including undocumented workers and participants in visa programs for temporary workers; foreign national domestic workers in diplomatic households; persons with limited English proficiency; personswith disabilities; LGBTQI+ persons; and victims of intimate partner violence or domestic violence."
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) explains Post -traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) can "develop after exposure to a potentially traumatic event that is beyond a typical stressor" and potential inducing events may include, but are not limited to, "violent personal assaults, natural or human -caused disasters, accidents, combat, and other forms of violence." Symptoms of PTSD can be debilitating. The U.S.
Department of Veteran's Affairs National Center for PTSD recognizes the disorder impacts populations inside and outside of the military including families, children, and non-combatants. The National Center reports an estimated six percent of the population - eight percent of women and four percent of men - will have PTSD at some point in their lives. Applying those rates to the 110,720 residents of the City of Temecula, approximately 6,643 suffer from PTSD.
The 2020 Homeless PIT count reported 184 sheltered and 627 unsheltered individuals, representing nearly 34 percent of all homeless people in Riverside County, were living with severe mental illness. Within this group are some individuals who suffer from PTSD. Applying the definition of PTSD from above to the 3S sheltered and 177 unsheltered homeless people in Riverside County who have experienced the trauma of domestic violence it is reasonable to assume some also experience PTSD. Similarly, of the SO sheltered and 183 unsheltered veterans in the County it is reasonable to assume some experienced trauma during military service and may suffer from PTSD.
Challenges these special needs populations and subpopulations face include low- income and high housing cost. This segment of the population also struggles for a decent quality of life that includes access to necessities, adequate food, clothing, and medical care.
Novel coronavirus COVID-79
COVID-19 caused a global pandemic. It's widespread impact on the United States began in March 2020. In the ensuing years ways of life changed dramatically from the impact of measures to prevent spread of disease and deaths cause by the disease.
Vaccines are proven to reduce hospitalization and death from COVID-19. In November 2022 vaccines became available to people ages five and over. The number of people TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 114
who are sick with or have died from COVID-19 increases daily. According to the most relevant data source per geography COVID-19 cases and deaths and vaccination rates as of January 27, 2022, are as follows:
Unites States
California
Riverside County
Temecula
Cases
72,8744,041
7,629,666
445,110
12,483
Deaths
873,957
86,021
5,812
111
Percentage of
population age 5 and
over with at least one
79.8%
81.7%
67.0%
70.4%
vaccine for
Table 29
Data Source: California Department of Health, Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, United States data is sourced from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), California State data is sources from California Public Health Department, Riverside County and Temecula data are sourced from Riverside University Public Health System, Temecula vaccination data is as of January 24, 2022.
COVID-19 has had a disproportionate impact on Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), including people who identify as Latinx/Hispanic regardless of racial identity. This is true nationwide including in Riverside County. The Riverside University Public Health reports case rates by race/ethnicity as of January 27, 2022, as follows:
• American Indian or Alaska Native -15%
• Asian -9%
• Black or African American -13%
• Hispanic/ Latinx-15%
• Multiple Races - 6%
• Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander -31%
• White-10%
In the last five years, the City of Temecula provided CDBG public service funds for activities including those providing supportive services for people with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, seniors, and disabled adults.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 115
NA-50 NON -HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS
Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Facilities.
Temecula's 2030 Quality of Life Master Plan describes the City as built upon a strong base of civic participation. In 1989, when the City was incorporated, it was a small bedroom community. It has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activitysince then. Asthe Citycontinuesto grow, new areas, facilities and open spaces are incorporated into the City's General Plan. While new facilities and amenities continue to be added, older facilities require rehabilitation to address the changing needs of the community.
The City of Temecula Community Services Master Plan, completed in early 2020, identified the city's significant public spaces and needs, and provides a vision for future investment. The City of Temecula has 41 parks covering over 320 acres, over 6,000 acres of preserved open space, 22 miles of trails, 97 miles of bike paths, and 14 community facilities including a library, senior center, four recreation centers, two museums, and the Old Town Temecula Community theater. The City also has three public pools, a universally accessible playground, a skate park, and a pump track.
Maintaining and expanding these amenities requires significant financial investment.
Responses to the Resident and Community Stakeholder Surveys give insight into the needs and priorities of those who live and work in Temecula. Residents responded there is the highest level of need for health care facilities and that health care facilities are second in priority to homeless facilities. Stakeholders responded the highest level of need is for senior and youth centers. The largest number of residents responded there is a high or moderate level of need for youth centers.
CDBG public facility projects that meet CDBG eligibility requirements, align with a Strategic Plan goal and address a CDBG National Objective will be considered for funding in the five Annual Action Plans. The Strategic Plan includes a goal to improve public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income people or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income, such as elderly people and adults with disabilities. Some of the types of facilities and infrastructure that may require rehabilitation during the next five years include, but are not limited to community centers, senior centers, parks, and recreational facilities.
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified for public facilities were determined through Community Meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey and consultation with City officials. Over the next five years, the Strategic Plan continues to prioritize additional or improved public facilities to enhance or maintain the high level of services and amenities available to Temecula residents.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 116
LEVEL OF NEED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
MENTAL HEALTH
FOR ABUSED AND NEGLECTED CHILDREN
CHILDCARE
HOMELESS
HEALTH CARE
ANTI -CRIME PROGRAMS
FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
YOUTH
SENIOR
TRANSPORTATION
SUBSTANCE ABUSE .
FOR SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT _
DIGITAL LITERACY _
FOR PERSONS WITH HIVfAIDS -
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
LEGAL MR
0% 20% 40% 50% 90% 100%
HIGH NEED MODERATE NEED LOW NEED NO NEED Rr NO OPINION
Figure 29: Resident Survey, Need for Public Facilities
HIGHEST PRIORITY PUBLIC FACILITIES
(EXCLUDING CATEGORIES WITH LESS THAN FOUR RESPONSES)
0 %
a
2 0
Lij V]
id
iL'
0SiJ
J t:
w Z
E
w
U O
m I
�-%
1iJ
e
w LL
w
O U
Q
_
0 G] w
L
w_ w
z
= w
I.L
N
=
J 0
U
LL 2
i.i Z
=
LL
iL
20%
40% 60% 80% 100%
Figure 30: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Public Facility TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 117
Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Improvements.
Infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, storm drains, sewers, driveway approaches, pedestrian crossing, and streetlights in CDBD target areas or to support a project that benefits an identifiable segment of the population comprised of low - and moderate -income residents or residents presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income must be developed and maintained. Infrastructure improvements are included as part of the Strategic Plan goal concerning City of Temecula Public Facilities Improvements should the need arise to modify existing infrastructure or install new infrastructure.
Responses to the Resident Survey show public infrastructure for high-speed internet is and street/ alley improvements are of greatest need and highest priority.
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified for public infrastructure improvements were determined in consultation with the City residents, City of Temecula's Public Works Department, Community Services Department, and affordable housing developers.
LEVEL OF NEED FOR PUBLIC
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
HIGH-SPEED INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE ■ ■
STREET/ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS
CODE ENFORCEMENT (E.G. COMPLIANCE WITH...
ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
I
TREE PLANTING
I
STREET LIGHTING
WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
0% 20%
HIGH NEED MODERATE NEED LOW NEED
40% 60% 90% 10G%
NO NEED NO OPINION
Figure 31: Resident Survey, Need for Public Infrastructure Improvements TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 118
HIGHEST PRIORITY PUBLIC
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
6 Z
Z
UJ
ul W
-
L_J
UJ
Z
W
z
wIr
Q
Q
cc
C
Q_
fL
U r
a�
W
IL
¢ u�
4 "J a
W y
W
LLJ
u
n
~
m
LJ WLLJ
= 2
Q
Z
W
tEJ
W
Q I
O
W
ir
y
O h
¢
Q
U _
Ln
0% 2G% 4G% 60% SG% 100%
Figure 32: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Public Infrastructure Improvement Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Services.
Those in need of public services are diverse and numerous. The homeless and non - homeless special needs populations are described in the Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment sections 40 and 4S. Results from resident and community stakeholder surveys show the largest number respondents see a high and moderate need for mental health services followed by youth services and childcare services. Residents responding to the survey believe anti -crime programs, mental health services, and homeless services to be highest priority for the City.
Stakeholder surveys were solicited from employees of agencies and organizations providing services to low- and moderate -income residents of Temecula. These surveys show four types of services where 100 percent of the need was high or moderate. In order from most highly needed to least those services are as follows: services for disabled persons, supportive services for seniors, mental health services, and domestic violence services. Additionally, stakeholders identified substance abuse services and center/ services for disabled persons as of the greatest high and moderate need.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 119
How were these needs determined?
Public service needs are based on the City's desire to ensure that high quality services are provided to maintain residents' quality of life and to promote the well-being of all Temecula residents — particularly low- and moderate -income residents including youth, seniors, and people with special needs. Responses to the Resident Survey are presented in Error! Reference source not found. and Error! Reference source not found.. Responses to the Stakeholder Survey are not presented graphically, as it had a total of eight responses. As a result of the citizen participation and consultation process and in consideration of the local nonprofits and City departments offering services, the City considers public services benefitting low- and moderate -income residents a high priority in the Strategic Plan.
LEVEL OF NEED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
MENTAL HEALTH
FOR ABUSED AND NEGLECTED CHILDREN
CHILDCARE
HOMELESS
HEALTH CARE
ANTI -CRIME PROGRAMS
FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE '
FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
YOUTH
SENIOR
TRANSPORTATION
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
.
FOR SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT
DIGITAL LITERACY
FOR PERSONS WITH HIVIAIDS
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
LEGAL
0% 20%
40% 50% 8095 100%
HIGH NEED MODERATE NEED LOW NEED NO NEED 0 NO OPINION
Figure 33: Resident Survey, Level of need for Public Services TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 120
HIGHEST PRIORITY PUBLIC
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
wLn
z
z
LLJ
W
ul W
-
L-J
W
Z
W
°
w�
Q
Q
_cc
C
Q
LLJ
fL
U r
a�
W
IL
¢ u�
4 �,J a
W y
W
�
J
J
LJ
fE
Z
u
J
n
~
m
LJ WLLJ
=
Q
Z
W
tEJ
W
Q I
O
W
y
O h
¢
Q
U _
Ln
0% 2G% 4G% 60% SG% IG()%
Figure 34: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Public Service TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 121
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 OVERVIEW
Housing Market Analysis Overview
This section of the Consolidated Plan evaluates housing market conditions in Temecula including housing supply, demand, condition, and cost. Temecula's housing stock primarily consists of single-family detached residential dwellings (78 percent), with 21,165 or 93 percent of the owner -occupied housing stock consisting of units with three or more bedrooms and most of the rental housing stock consisting of units that have two bedrooms (6,250 units or 52 percent) or one bedroom (4,095 units or 34 percent).
From September 2017 to September 2021, median home value in Temecula increased 49 percent from $454,000 to $676,000, according to Zillow Home Value Index. Median monthly rent for a one -bedroom unit increased by 43 percent from $1,833 to $2,185, as reported by Zumper, a rental listing aggregator. As a result, Temecula households have become increasingly cost -burdened. Data from 2013-2017 shows that there is an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 80 percent of AM I.
In the Needs Assessment section of this document, tables 10 and 11 show, of the households earning 0-80 percent of AMI, 6,070 are cost burdened households — meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing.
Additionally, most cost burdened households, 4,645 households, are considered severely cost burdened households — meaning they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the 4,645 severely cost burdened households earning 0- 80 percent of AMI, 2,965 are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter households,1,100 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 122
UNITS AFFORDABLE BY
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
S$095 HAMFI
Lii,13
5544� HAMFI
130
<_30% HAMFI
U 2,aaa 4,666 6,000 8,000
■ Affordable Units ■ Households
Figure 35
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
According to Table 36 - Housing Affordability in Section MA -IS, there are 2,150 rental and 389 owner housing units in the City of Temecula affordable to households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. According to Table 7 - Total Households Table in Section NA-10, there are 7,600 households in Temecula earning less than 80 percent of AMI, resulting in an estimated need for 5,061 additional housing units that are affordable to households earning less than 80 percent of AMI.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 123
MA-10 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS
Introduction
According to 2013-2017 ACS data, 84 percent of the City's housing stock is comprised of single- family housing (one -four units). Multifamily housing (five or more units) accounts for only16 percent of total housing units in the City. Mobile homes comprise the smallest portion of the housing stock in the City (one percent).
Most ownership housing units in the City of Temecula is comprised of larger units containing three or more bedrooms (52 percent). In comparison, only 14 percent of the City's rental housing is comprised of one- or no bedroom units. The tables below indicate the number of residential properties in the City by property type, unit size and tenure.
Property Type
Number
%
1-unit detached structure
27,965
78%
1-unit, attached structure
925
3%
2-4 u nits
960
3%
5-19 units
3,440
10%
20 or more units
2,145
6%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc.
338
1%
Total
35,773
100%
Table 30 - Residential Properties by Unit Number
n.gta Sc)urce• 9013-9017 ACS
Owners
Renters
Number
%
Number
%
No bedroom
25 0%
200
2%
1 bedroom
55 0%
1,500
12%
2 bedrooms
1,350
6%
4,095
34%
3 or more bedrooms
20,165
93%
6,250
52%
Total
21,595
99%
12,045
100%
Table 31 - Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 124
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.
As of fall 2021, the City monitors a total of 17 affordable housing projects in Temecula, which were constructed or rehabilitated with federal subsidy contracts, received tax credits or mortgage revenue bonds, and /orwere financed by Redevelopment Agency (RDA) funds or nonprofit developers. The 17 projects consist of a total of 764 units in which 759 units are restricted to extremely/very low, low- and moderate -income households (under State HCD guidelines).
Over the last fiveyears, three entitled affordable housing projects have broken ground and will add a total of 191 new affordable units to Temecula's housing stock. Those projects are as follows: (1) Vice Creek with a total of 60 units of which 18 are targeted for households earning 30 percent of AMI, 12 for households with incomes at 50 percent AMI, 29 for households at 60 percent AMI, with a subset of 15 units targeted for people with special needs; (2) Las Hacienda with a total of 77 units of which 24 are targeted to households at 30 percent of AMI, eight for households earning 50 percent of AMI, 44 for households earning 80 percent of AMI and one market rate unit; (3) Rancho -Highlands with a total of 270 units, 55 of which are targeted to households earning 80 percent of AMI and the remainder of which are market rate.
Like all cities in the State of California, Temecula is challenged by a lack of resources to address its affordable housing needs due to the dissolution of all the State's redevelopment agencies. This had been the source of many affordable housing units constructed in the City.
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
HUD requires the City to analyze federal, state and locally assisted housing units that may be lost from the City's affordable housing stock. The expiration of affordability restrictions on government assisted rental units is the typical reason that affordable units convert to market rate and are "lost." Much of the housing at -risk of conversion from affordable housing to market rate housing is predominantly reserved for lower income households.
Use restrictions, as defined by state law, means any federal, state, or local statute, regulation, ordinance, or contract which as a condition of receipt of any housing assistance, including a rental subsidy, mortgage subsidy, or mortgage insurance, to an assisted housing development, establishes maximum limitations on tenant income as a condition of eligibility for occupancy.
Conversion Risk
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 125
Table 32 provides an inventory of affordable housing developments, including funding sources, number of units, target populations, and earliest date of conversion to market -rate housing. Analysis shows, for the period ending May 2021, 754 affordable housing units 256 are at high risk of converting to market rate housing. The units at high risk of conversion are part of two projects, both of which were funded with Redevelopment Agency loans. The restrictions on those properties are set to expire in 2026.
Project/Address
Type
Total Units
Type of
Date of
Risk
Subsidy
Conversion
Cameron
Family
24 RDA Loan
2062
Low
Historical
Building
Cottages of Old
17 RDA Loan
2047
Low
Town
Creekside Apts.
48 LIHTC,
2040
Low
Sections
515,538,521
Front Street
Family &
23 RDA Loan
2069
Low
Plaza
Senior
FT-02-029
1 LI HTC
2027
High
Habitat I & II
9 Land/Cash
2047
Low
Contribution
Madera Vista
Family &
110
LIHTC
2068
Low
Apts.
Senior
Mission Village
Family
75 LIHTC
2029
High
Apts.
Oaktree Apts.
Family
39 LIHTC,
2040
Low
Sections
515,538,521
Palomar
Family
22 RDA Loan
2062
Low
Building
Portola Terrace
Family &
44 LIHTC
2067
Low
Apts.
Senior
Rancho
Family
54 LIHTC
2067
Low
California Apts.
Rancho West
Family
150
RDA Loan
2026
High
Apts.
Rancho Creek
Family
30 RDA Loan
2026
High
Apts.
Riverbank
Family
65 LIHTC
2058
Low
Apts./Pujol
Street Senior
Apts.
Temecula
Family
11 Builder
2065
Low
Reflections
Financed/
(Temecula Lane)
Development
Rights
Warehouse at
Family
32 RDA Loan
2065
Low
Creekside Apts.
Table 32
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 126
Preservation and Replacement Options
To maintain the existing affordable housing stock, the City may either attempt to preserve the existing assisted units or facilitate the development of new units. Each negotiation to preserve affordable units is unique in the sense that each project's ownership interests, and economic needs will vary, and City resources may be insufficient to preserve all 256 high risk units. Depending on the circumstances of each project that includes at -risk units, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units. The City is currently exploring formation of a potential Housing Trust in cooperation with Western Riverside Council of Governments.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? The current availability of housing units in Temecula do not meet the needs of the population. There is a significant need for additional rental housing units — particularly zero, one, and two -bedroom units affordable to households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. According to the data discussed in the Needs Assessment, the most common housing problems in the City are cost burden and overcrowding.
There are 2,150 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI that are severelycost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs (Table 11). Overcrowding, having more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half -rooms, affects over 479 low- and moderate - income Temecula households, almost 86 percent of whom are renters (Table 12).
Describe the need for specific types of housing.
Of the 2,150 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs:
• 1,350 are small, related households with four or fewer members • 170 are large, related households with five or more members • 425 are elderly households with one or more members overage 62 • 205 are other/single person households
This breakdown by tenure, income, cost burden and household type indicate a need for additional affordable zero-, one- and two -bedroom rental units in Temecula.
Discussion
For decades, California's housing market has been among the most expensive in the country, and those conditions persist in 2021. Renting can take up a considerable amount of income, while purchasing a home may be out of reach for individuals. To afford median rent for a two -bedroom unit in 2021, a household needs to earn $49 per hour or work 140 hours per week at minimum wage of $14 per hour, which equates to over three full time jobs. These calculations were made using the same method as the National Low Income Housing Coalition in the Out if Reach series and using median rents from Zumper a rental listing aggregator. Median rents are far greater than fair TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 127
market rents and more accurately reflect the experience low- and moderate -income households are facing.
MINIMUM WAGE HOURS AND
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
200 HOURS
Y
LU150 HOURS
100 HOURS
O
50 HOURS
0 HOURS ---
1-bedroom 2-bedroom 3-bedroom
UNIT TYPE
e Full Time ■ $14 >_25 employees ■ $13 _S 25 employees
Figure 36
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/2021), California Employment Data As noted in the 2021-2029 Housing Element, it is the City's goal to encourage the development of an adequate and diverse supply of housing that accommodates the changing housing needs of all Temecula residents. Over the next eight years the City will strive to meet the following housing goals and priorities:
• Provide a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and economic needs of existing and future residents of Temecula. • Provide housing for people of different economic segments with special needs. • Reduce and/ or remove governmental and non -governmental constraints in the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible.
• Conserve and improve existing housing stock with an emphasis on affordable housing.
• Affirmatively further fair housing, providing equal housing opportunity for all residents in Temecula.
• Encourage collaboration between housing developers and neighborhood organizations on affordable housing projects and addressing neighborhood concerns.
Through these efforts, the City will strive to maintain a healthy community that encourages family stability and economic growth.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 128
MA-15 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: COST OF HOUSING
Introduction
One of the most important factors in evaluating a community's housing market is the cost of housing and whether the housing is affordable to households who live there or would like to live there. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income, a correspondingly high prevalence of housing cost burden and overcrowding will typically occur.
Table 34 - Cost of Housing indicates the median home value and contract rent (not including utility or other associated costs). These values are self -reported by residents through the U.S. Census American Community Survey. However, in looking at more current housing sales and rental market data - the cost of housing has risen tremendously over the past five years.
According to Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, median rents for one -bedroom, two - bedroom, and three -bedroom units have increased steadily (43, 4S and 39 percent, respectively) from October 2017 to 2021. There was a short-lived decline in rents for one -bedroom units in 2019. The 2017 median rents reported by Zumper significantly exceeded the median contract rent as reported by the ACS 2013-2017 estimates. documented in the Cost of Housing table below.
CHANGE IN AVERAGE RENT
$ 3,000
$2,500
$ 2,000
$1,500
$ MKO
$500
$D
OCT-17 OCT-19 OCT-19 OCT-20 OCT-21
-1-BEDROOM -2-BEDROOM 3-BEDROOM
Figure 37
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/2021), California Employment Data Median home values have increased significantly since the last Consolidated Planning process. In 2017, according to ACS data, median home values in Temecula were still eight percent below what they had been in 2009, prior to the mortgage -backed securities housing foreclosure crisis. By 2018, according to the same source, housing prices rebounded to 2009 levels. From September 2017 to 2021 housing values for Temecula increased 49 percent, from $483,000 to $676,000, according to the Zillow Home Value Index.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 129
CHANGE IN HOME VALUE
$700,000
$650,000
$600,000
$5 50,000
SEP-17 SEP-19 SEP-19 SEP-20 SEP-21
Figure 38
Data Source: 2017-2021 Zillow Home Value Data (accessed 12/22/21) Based on the reported housing costs, Table 36 - Housing Affordability indicates the number of units that are currently affordable to households at different levels of the HUD AMI. It is important to note, simply because a unit is affordable to residents at an income level, it does not necessarily mean a household at that income level is occupying the unit.
Rental Housing
Cost by Bedroom
Oct. 2017
Oct. 2021
Percent Change
1-bedroom
$1,476
$2,109
43%
2-bedroom
$1,680
$2,430
45%
3-bedroom
$1,979
$2,748
39%
Table 33 - Rental Housing Cost Estimates
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/2021)
Cost of Housing
Base Year: 2009
Most Recent Year:2017
% Change
Median Home Value
427,900
394,600
-8%
Median Contract Rent
1,302
1,569
21%
Table 34 - Cost of Housing
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year) TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 130
Rent Paid
Number
%
Less than $500
610
5.0%
$500-999
1,148
10.0%
$1,000-1,499
3.930
33.0%
$1,500-1,999
3,880
32.0%
$2,000 or more
2,490
21.0%
Total
12,058
100.0%
Table 35 - Rent Paid
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Units affordable to Households at:
Renter
Owner
30% HAMFI
130
No Data
50% HAMFI
460
105
80% HAM FI
1,560
284
100% HAMFI
No Data
687
Total
2,150
1,076
Table 36 - Housing Affordability
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Monthly Rent ($)
Efficiency (no
bedroom)
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
Fair Market Rent
955
1,106
1,390
1,917
2,369
High HOME Rent
879
943
1,134
1,302
1,433
Low HOME Rent
691
740
888
1,027
1,146
Table 37 - Monthly Rent
Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents
Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? Housing cost burden and severe housing cost burden data from section NA-10 indicates there is an insufficient supply of affordable housing units in the City.
Insufficient supply of affordable housing is reality throughout the country, exemplified by the need in Temecula, Riverside County, and California Quantifying the number of additional affordable housing units needed to eliminate or significantly reduce cost burden and severe cost burden is complicated because there is no guarantee a TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 131
household of a particular income level will occupy a unit affordable at their income level - even if the unit is available in the open marketplace.
Table 36 - Housing Affordability provides 2013-2017 CHAS data concerning the supply of housing units in the City that are affordable to households earning at or below 30, 50, 80 and 100 percent of AMI. According to 2013-2017 ACS data in Table 7, there are 1,880 households in Temecula earning 0-30 percent of AMI. Table 36 indicates there are a total of 130 rental units affordable to households at this income level. Based on this data, there is an apparent need for 1,750 additional housing units affordable to households earning 0-30 percent of AMI. At the 0-50 percent of AMI level, there are 695 affordable units and 4,090 households in this income category -a shortfall of3,395 units. At the 0-80 percent of AMI level, there are 2,539 affordable units and 7,600 households in this income category -a shortfall of 5,061 units.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents?
Rental housing costs have increased steadily over the past five years - creating more pressure on extremely low-income households. According to data in Table 32 from Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, average rents for one -bedroom apartments rose from $1,476 per month in 2017 to $2,109 per month in 2021, a 43 percent increase. Two - bedroom apartment rents increased from $1,680 to $2,430 on average, an increase of 45 percent. Three -bedroom rents increased from $1,979 to $2,748 an increase of 39 percent over the last five years. These rents for the City of Temecula are substantially higher than the Fair Market Rents for Riverside County and represent a significant burden for low- and moderate -income households struggling to remain housed.
Similarly, median home sales prices increased from $454,000 to $676,000 from September 2017 to 2021 according to sales data supplied by Zillow as show in Figure
38. Based on this information and barring significant regional and national changes in economic conditions, the price of housing in Temecula is forecast to continue increasing during the period of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
The median contract rent according to 2013-2017 ACS data was $1,569, which is slightly more than the Fair Market Rent for a two -bedroom unit, $1,390 and even closer to market rent for a one -bedroom as reported by Zumper. To produce or preserve affordable rental housing units that carry a minimum HOME affordability period of 20 years, significant levels of subsidy are required. Taking only rents into consideration, an owner of a two -bedroom unit would forego $58,560 of operating income over 20 years, in 2021 dollars, when renting the unit at Low HOME rent levels instead of at Fair Market Rent. An owner of a one -bedroom unit would forego $79,200 of operating income over 20 years, in 2021 dollars, when renting the unit at Low HOME rent levels instead of market rates.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 132
RENT DIFFERENTIAL
$1, 50d
$1,400 'VIED IAN
CONTRACT RENT CLOSEST FAIR
$1,20d $1,569
MARKET RENT
$1,66d 2-BEDROOM
$S0d $1,390
$500
$466
$266
$d
6w
CLOSEST MARKET
RATE RENT
CLOSEST LOW 1-BEDROOM
HOME RENT $1,476
4-BEDROOM
$1,145
Figure 39
Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents, 2015-2017 ACS Data, Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/21) Discussion
Economic expansion over the last decade and a lag in production of new housing units in Southern California have created a housing economy that is over -burdened.
For the City of Temecula that means early master planning efforts and visions of a community with diverse housing stock and household incomes are being pushed to the brink. This is a microcosm of national and especially regional increases in housing prices and insufficient supply of affordable housing.
Temecula is easily accessible to San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, and Los Angeles counties. Due to its proximity to a variety of jobs centers, Temecula is a desirable and relatively affordable place to reside. As a result, Temecula households have become increasingly cost -burdened. Data from 2013-2017 shows an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 30, SO, and 80 percent of AMI. Considering the scarcity of land and monetary resources available to create new affordable housing units, housing affordability is expected to remain a significant challenge in the next five years. The City actively monitors this steadily increasing pressure and the already limited supply of affordable housing.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 133
MA-20 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: CONDITION OF
HOUSING - 91.210(A)
Introduction
Assessing the age and physical condition of housing in Temecula forms the basis of strategies to maintain and improve housing quality for low- and moderate -income residents. For this assessment, the ACS defines a "selected condition" as owner- or renter -occupied housing units with at least one of the following conditions:1) lacking complete plumbing facilities; 2) lacking complete kitchen facilities; 3) more than one occupant per room; and 4) selected monthly housing costs greater than 30 percent of household income. Although most housing units in Temecula have none of the defined conditions, Table 37 shows 52 percent of renter -occupied units in Temecula have one or two selected conditions.
Definitions
Substandard housing is housing that does not meet the minimum standards contained in the State Housing Code (i.e., does not provide shelter, endangers health, safety, or well-being of occupants). A substandard condition is one that adversely affects habitability of the housing unit. As defined by California Health and Safety Code, a substandard condition exists to the extent that it endangers the health and safety of its occupants or the public. Such conditions include:
• Inadequate sanitation
• Structural hazards
• Any nuisance that endangers the health and safety of the occupants or the public
• All substandard plumbing, wiring, and/or mechanical equipment, unless it conformed to all applicable laws in effect at the time of installation and has been maintained in a good and safe condition
• Faulty weather protection
• The use of construction materials not allowed or approved by the health and safety code
• Fire, health and safety hazards (as determined by the appropriate fire or health official)
• Lack of, or inadequate fire -resistive construction or fire -extinguishing systems as required by the health and safety code, unless the construction and/or systems conformed to all applicable laws in effect at the time of construction and/or installation and adequately maintained
• Inadequate structural resistance to horizontal forces • Buildings or portions thereof occupied for living, sleeping, cooking, or dining purposes that were not designed or intended to be used for such occupancies • Inadequate maintenance that causes a building or any portion thereof to be declared unsafe
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 134
Standard housing condition in the City of Temecula is defined as housing that meets the minimum standards of the State Housing Code. For the purposes of the CDBG program, a unit in substandard condition is considered suitable for rehabilitation provided the unit is structurally sound, and the cost of rehabilitation is considered economically warranted.
Condition of Units
Owner -Occupied
Renter -Occupied
Number
%
Number
%
With one selected Condition
6,620
31%
5,785
48%
With two selected Conditions
155
1%
505
4%
With three selected
Conditions
0 0%
0 0%
With four selected Conditions
0 0%
0 0%
No selected Conditions
14,825
69%
5,750
48%
Total
21,600
101%
12,040
100%
Table 38 - Condition of Units
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Year Unit Built
Owner -Occupied
Renter -Occupied
Number
%
Number
%
2000 or later
8,290
38%
4,900
41%
1980-1999
11,920
SS%
6,050
50%
1950-1979
1,285
6%
990
80 Before 1950
105
0%
105
1%
Total
21,600
99%
12,045
100%
Table 39 - Year Unit Built
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Risk of Lead -Based Paint Hazard
Owner -Occupied
Renter -Occupied
Number
%
Number
%
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980
1,415
7%
1,035
5%
Housing Units build before 1980 with
children present
95 0%
155
1%
Table 40 - Risk of Lead -Based Paint
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Total Units) 2013-2017 CHAS (Units with Children present) TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 135
2018
2019
Level
Riverside County
California
Riverside County
California
4.5-9.4
154
5,850
147
4,575
9.5+
26 1,291
38 1,128
Total Tested
34,046
480,954
34,873
473,396
Estimate of the number
of children under the
age of 6
181,235
2,922,681
183,582
2,871,558
Table 41 - Number of State of California and Riverside County Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels (EBLLs) 2018-2019, Source: California Department of Public Health Childhood Lead poisoning Prevention Branch, California Blood Lead Data 2019 and 2018 Notes for 2078-2079 BLL Data
Data are from the RASSCLE surveillance database archive of3/2/2021. Each individual is counted only once, using their highest blood lead level (BLL) during 2019. Measures are in micrograms per deciliter (mcg/dL) of whole blood and include arterial, cord, venous, capillary, and unknown samples. Not all elevated capillary samples are confirmed by a follow-up venous sample. Results later determined to be false positive and errors have been excluded. All results of blood lead analyses are reportable under California law, and the State works to ensure complete reporting. Results that are not submitted to the State, however, would not be included here. Those BLLs reported from the analyzing laboratory as "< 5 mcg/dL" are included in the category "BLL < 4.5 mcg/dL." Patient jurisdiction is determined by geocoding the address associated with the child's highest BLL using Esri's StreetMap Premium North America locator. Data are suppressed for local health jurisdictions that did not have enough blood lead tests in 2019 to meet the California Health and Human Services Agency's Data De - Identification Guidelines for public release. The estimate of the number of children under 6 was based on the California Department of Finance County Population Projections by Age.
Vacant Units
Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Not Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Total
Vacant Units
0 0
0 Abandoned Vacant Units
0 0
0 REO Properties
0 0
0 Abandoned REO Properties
0 0
0 Table 42 - Vacant Units
Data Source: No data available.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 136
Vacant Units
June 2021
June 2020
June 2019
Residential Vacant Addresses
0.3%
0.62%
0.53%
Business Vacant Addresses
15.7%
15%
13.7 All Addresses No Stat
1.18%
0.84%
0.91 Table 43
Data Source: Policy Map with Valassis Lists (accessed 12/7/21) Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
The age and condition of Temecula's housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Housing over 30 years of age can be presumed to need some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air-conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures. Housing values in Temecula have increased significantly over a relatively short period of time. Longtime homeowners, especially the elderly and disabled, are more likely to have fixed and limited incomes and may have difficulty maintaining their homes.
According to 2013-2017 HUD CHAS data, over 90 percent of owner- and renter - occupied housing in Temecula was built after 1979, making those properties 42 years old at most, as of 2022. Nearly seven percent or 2,275 of 33,645 owner- and renter - occupied units were built between 1950 and 1979, and less than one percent, totaling 210 units, were built before 1950. There are 9,099 households with at least one member over the age of 62 and 2,624, or 29 percent, of those households earn at or below 80 percent of AMI, according to 2013-2017 CHAS data. There are approximately 5,940 people ages18 to 64with disabilities, according to 2017, ACS one-year estimates. There are many households which could benefit from rental and housing rehab assistance in Temecula.
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate - Income Families with LBP Hazards
Any housing built before 1978 may contain lead -based paint. If ingested, lead may cause severe damage to young children including decreased growth, learning disabilities, impaired hearing, hyperactivity, nerve, and brain damage. Lead attacks the central nervous system, the neurological system, and can cause brain damage, IQ reduction, learning disabilities, decreased attention span, hyperactivity, growth inhibition, comas, seizures, and in some cases, death. Fetuses may also experience significant adverse effects through prenatal exposure. Children are more susceptible to the effects of lead because their growing bodies absorb more lead, and young children often put their hands and other objects in their mouths. Most children do not have any symptoms, even if a blood test shows that they have an elevated blood lead TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 137
level. If a child does have symptoms, the symptoms may be mistaken for the flu or other illnesses.
Children undertheage offive areconsidered most susceptible to lead poisoning. Most of the housing stock in Temecula was built after 1979 and is presumed to not contain lead paint. Based on 2013-2017 CHAS data there were 75 renter -occupied units built at for before 1979, with households earning less than or equal to 80 percent of AMI and children six years of age. There were no owner -occupied units meeting the same criteria.
Number of Children with Elevated Blood Levels of Lead
The State of California mandates lead screening for all children who participate in publicly funded health programs. In California, screening typically occurs at ages one and two years. A blood level of 10 pg/dL or higher was previously referred to as an "elevated blood level (EBL)." However, as it is now recognized that there is no safe level of lead, and adverse effects occur at levels below 10 pg/dL. Of Riverside County children under the age of six who's blood lead level has been tested about 2.5 percent have level of 4.5 mcg/dL and less than one percent have blood lead levels greater than
9.5 mcg/dL.
Blood lead level testing rates are low in Riverside County and through California.
RATE OF BLOOD LEAD LEVEL TESTING
CALIFORNIA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
a% 20% 40% 60% 90% 100%
■ TOTAL TESTED a ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN UNDER 6 Data Source: Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, CA Department of Health Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate - Income Families that Contain Lead -Based Paint Hazards
Older housing is more likelyto have lead -based paint and the amount of lead pigment in the paint tends to increase with the age of the housing. Most ofTemecula's housing stock (72 percent) was built after 1979, when the use of lead -based paint was outlawed, eliminating the residents of these homes from risk of lead -based paint hazards.
It is difficult to estimate with much accuracy the number of housing units occupied by low- or moderate -income families that contain lead paint due the changing nature of children and the transiency of renter households. The 2013-2017 CAHS data shows 75 low- and moderate income (0-80 percent of AMI) renter households with children TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 138
under the age of six lived in housing built after 1980. Given the age of this housing stock there is a greater chance it contains lead paint.
Discussion
Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate -income households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units already affordable to low- and moderate -income households in the community. As shown in figure 40 most residents who participated in the city's survey believe assistance to purchase a home is the highest priority in their community, followed by energy efficient improvements, and fair housing discrimination services. Alternatively, respondents to the stakeholder survey all believe supportive services for the disables are the most highly needed in Temecula.
LEVEL OF NEED FOR HOUSING SEVICES
CODE ENFORCEMENT (E.G. COMPLIANCE WITH
BUILDING, HEALTH AND SAFETY CODES &
PROPERTY APPEARANCE)
ENERGY EFFICIENT IMPROVEMENTS (E.G
WINDOWS, AC UNITS, LIGHTING)
LEAD -BASED PAINTREMOVAL
FAIR HOUSING DISCRIMINATION SERVICES
ASSISTANCE TO PURCHASE A HOME
HOUSING REHABILITATION W
0! 20% 40% 60% 90% 100%
HIGH NEED MODERATE NEE© LOW NEED NO NEED ' NO OPINION
Figure 40: Level of Need Housing Service
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 139
HIGHEST PRIORITY HOUSING SERVICE
Lai
§
\§/
�
03 k
2 y
a 7 z
§
§
e z
L§
j g
n 7
z
«
m
} \
u<�
§
p
)
$
0 2 }
_
ED
§ �
�
}
\
b $ §
_ }
2 \
} \ \
j
§ k §
20 \
\§§
tn \
z
\ ?
\nm
LA
§
// /
y ƒ /
/
o a
\
2 /
}
ƒ
B% 2a% 4a 60% Ea !m%
Figure 4:Highest prority Housing Service
TE V EC U L& 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 140
MA-25 PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING
Introduction
As indicated in section NA-35, Temecula is within the service area of the Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACK) for the purposes of Section 8 and Public Housing. The data presented in the tables below is countywide and the narrative responses address the needs for the entire County, with specific references to the City of Temecula.
Program Type
Vouchers
Public
Special Purpose Voucher
Housing
Mod -
by
Program
Rehab
Certificate
Total
Project
Tenant
Veterans
Family
Type
-based
-based
Affairs
Unification
Disabled*
Supportive
Housing
program
# of
units
79 456
8,748
36 8,364
135
178
19 vouchers
in use
Table 44 - Total Number of Units by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
*Note - Data was not available on vouchers by project -based and tenant -based designation Describe the supply of public housing developments.
HUD data provided by the Picture of Subsidized Households initiative shows at the end of 2020, there were 184 units of assisted housing in Temecula, 129 of which are Housing Choice Vouchers and 55 of which are Project Based Section
8. HACR monitors all units to ensure they are in adequate condition.
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan
HACR's Streamlined Annual PHA Plan reports the Housing Authority has received high performer status for 17 consecutive years. This designation reflects the Housing Authority's most recent Public Housing Assessment System and Section Eight Management Assessment Program results, and the number of type of units under its management.
HUD required physical inspection scores show Rancho Family Housing, a 55-unit development with project -based vouchers received an overall inspection score of 94c in October 2018. The score is based on 100 points. The letters reflect health and safety TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 141
deficiencies: a, for no deficiencies, b, yes there is one or more deficiency, but none are life -threatening, and c, for one or more life -threatening deficiency. HACR monitors all units to ensure they are in adequate condition.
Public Housing Condition
Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score
Not Applicable Not Applicable
Table 45 - Public Housing Condition
Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction.
There are no public housing units in Temecula. HACK uses Housing Quality Standards for the inspection of all voucher units.
Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low- and moderate -income families residing in public housing.
HACR works to increase assisted housing choices by expanding the supply and improving the quality of assisted housing. The Housing Authority promotes self- sufficiency within assisted housing programs by connecting households with various workforce programs. HACK strives to ensure equal opportunity and affirmatively further fair housing.
Discussion
As of September 2021, HACR assisted 8,428 households, 126 resided in Temecula in both project -based and Housing Choice Voucher assisted units. In about 66 percent of assisted households in Temecula the head of household identified as elderly and 44 percent as disabled. Households may identify as both elderly and disabled. HACR monitors al units to ensure they are in adequate condition and meet the Section 8 Housing Quality Standards.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 142
MA-30 HOMELESS FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Introduction
Regionally, there are numerous facilities and services targeted to residents at -risk of becoming homeless and experiencing homelessness, including a range of emergency shelters, transitional shelters, and permanent supportive housing options.
HUD uses the following definitions for these three facility types:
• Emergency Shelter: Any facility, the primary purpose of which is to provide a temporary shelter for the homeless in general or for specific populations of the homeless and which does not require occupants to sign leases or occupancy agreements.
• Transitional Housing: Transitional housing (TH) is designed to provide homeless individuals and families with the interim stability and support to successfully move to and maintain permanent housing. Transitional housing may be used to cover the costs of up to 24 months of housing with accompanying supportive services. Program participants must have a lease (or sublease) or occupancy agreement in place when residing in transitional housing.
• Permanent Supportive Housing: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is defined as community -based housing paired with supportive services to serve households in which at least one member has a disability. Housing does not have a designated length of stay in which formerly homeless individuals and families live as independently as possible. Under PH, a program participant must be the tenant on a lease (or sublease) for an initial term of at least one year that is renewable and is terminable only for cause.
Emergency Shelter
Transitional
permanent Supportive
Beds
Housing
Housing Beds
Facilities and
Beds
Year-
Voucher /
Housing Targeted to
Homeless
Round
Seasonal
Households
Beds
/
Current &
Current
Under
(Current &
Overflow
New
& New
Development
New)
Beds
Households with
Adult(s) and Child(ren)
310
42 414
Households with Only
Adults55
505
50 1,330
Chronically Homeless
N/A (data
N/A (data not
Households
not
860
available)
available)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 143
Emergency Shelter
Transitional
permanent Supportive
Beds
Housing
Housing Beds
Facilities and
Beds
Year-
Voucher /
Housing Targeted to
Homeless
Round
Seasonal
Households
Beds
/
Current &
Current
Under
(Current &
Overflow
New
& New
Development
New)
Beds
Veterans
0 25
975
Unaccompanied
Youth
29 27
17 Table 46 - Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households Data Source: 2020 Housing Inventory Chart
Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons
In California, the primary programs for assisting families in poverty are CaIWORKS, CalFresh, and Medi-Cal. These programs provide clients with employment assistance, discounted food, medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing and transportation.
The California Work Opportunities for Kids (CaIWORKs) program provides financial assistance and Welfare -to -Work services to California families with little to no cash.
Through this program these families may be eligible to receive immediate short-term help with housing, food, utilities, clothing, or medical care. Childcare is also available through this program.
CalFresh, formerly the Food Stamp Program, is a nutritional assistance program that provides Electronic Benefit Transfer Cards to people receiving public assistance to purchase food and other essential items.
The Medi-Cal program provides health coverage for people with low-income and limited abilityto payfor health coverage, including seniors, disabled,young adults and children, pregnant women, persons in a skilled nursing or intermediate care home, and persons in the Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program (BCCTP). People receiving federally funded cash assistance programs, such as CaIWORKs (a state implementation of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program), the State Supplementation Program (SSP) (a state supplement to the federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program), foster care, adoption assistance, certain refugee assistance programs, or In -Home Supportive Services (IHSS) are also eligible.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 144
CDBG, HOME and ESG-Funded Activities
Congress designed the CDBG program to serve low-income people, some of which may meet the federal poverty definition. The City of Temecula receives funding to run CDBG programs. At least 70 percent of all CDBG funds must be used for activities that are considered under program rules to benefit low- and moderate -income persons.
Additionally, every CDBG activity must meet one of three national objectives: benefit low- and moderate -income persons (at least 51 percent of the beneficiaries must be low- and moderate -income); address slums or blight; or meet a particularly urgent community development need. CDBG programs assist the homeless and those at - risk -of homelessness directly and indirectly.
List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.
Organization Name
city
Description
Alternative to
County
ADV Residential Shelter, Emergency Shelter,
Domestic Violence
60 beds; Residential Transitional Housing, 40
beds
Coachella Valley
County
County Overnight and Gateway Shelter,
Rescue Mission
Emergency Shelters, 345 beds
Riverside University
County
Hotel/Motel Voucher Program, Emergency
Health System,
Shelter, 46; Coachella Valley PH ''The Path"(25
Department of
beds), HHOPE Permanent Housing (103 beds),
Behavioral Health
Men's Permanent Housing (22 beds), Riverside
PH "The Place" (25 beds)
Department of Public
County
State HDAP Emergency Team, Emergency
Social Services
Shelter, 30 beds; State HDAP Rapid rehousing,
3 beds
Martha's Village and
Indio
Renewing Hope, Emergency Shelter,120 beds
Kitchen, Inc.
Operation Safe House
County,
Safe House - Desert, Riverside and Main STAY
Riverside &
Emergency Shelters, 28 beds, Main Street
Thousand
Transitional Living Program and OSH Harrison
Palms
House Transitional Living Program, 27 beds
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 145
Organization Name
City
Description
Path of Life Ministries
Riverside &
City of Riverside Year -Round Shelter & CVAG
Inc
County
W. Valley Navigation, Family and Cold
Weather, Emergency Shelters, 210 beds; Path
of Life Rapid Rehousing & East County (14
beds)
Shelter from the Storm
Palm Desert
Mary Stuart Rogers Center, Emergency
Shelter, 20 beds
Valley Restart Shelter
Hemet
Restart Center, Emergency Shelter, 35 beds
Inc.
Help for Future
Palm Desert
Transitional Housing for Veterans, 13 beds
Leaders
Lighthouse Social
Moreno Valley,
Transitional Living Services for Veterans, 12
Service Centers
Riverside &
beds; Lighthouse SSC Permanent Housing for
County
Disabled Women with Children (36 beds) &
Lighthouse Riverside PSH (29 beds); SSC Rapid
Rehousing & LSSC Renewal SSVF Program (66
beds)
City of Riverside
Riverside
Riverside PSH - Chronically Homeless &
Disabled (25 beds); Rapid Re -Housing (17 beds)
County Housing
County
Enhanced Housing, Shelter plus care (13 beds),
Authority
Housing Authority (161 beds), and VASH - Vet
Assisted Supportive Housing project (96 beds) -
and tenant -based (161); Rapid re -housing
CaIWORKS Housing Support (151 beds)
Jewish Family Services
County
PSH Consolidation 107 beds
Stepping Upon
County
Stepping Up in Riverside 92 beds
Second Street, Inc.
US Vets
County
US Vets SSVF Rapid Re -Housing 33 beds
Project T.O.U.C.H
Temecula
Homeless prevention and shared housing
Table 47: Homeless Service Providers for the City of Temecula TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 146
MA-35 SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Introduction
Special needs populations include persons who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services and supportive housing. The City of Temecula will consider allocating CDBG public service funding to programs that provide services to special needs populations, including but not limited to those serving the elderly, frail elderly, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, mentally disabled, alcohol or substance abusers, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, victims of human trafficking and veterans with PTSD or other needs.
Elderly is defined under the CDBG program as a person who is 62 years of age or older.
A frail elderly person is an elderly person who is unable to independently perform at least three "activities of daily living" including eating, bathing, grooming or home management activities. Based on 2013-2017 CHAS data of the 9,099 households containing at least one elderly person in Temecula, nearly 29 percent (2,624 households) earn less than 80 percent of the AMI for Riverside County. According to ACS data in 2017 there were approximately 4,665 people over the age of 65 living in Temecula. Within this age category nearly 60 percent of people had ambulatory and independent living difficulty and 25 percent had difficulty with self -care.
People with disabilities which include a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities generally rely on supportive services to perform activities of daily living. The Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population age 18 and to 64 in Temecula includes 67,915 individuals, an estimated 5,940 of whom have a disability (ACS, 2017 1-year estimates). Of those who have a disability 38 percent have cognitive difficulty, 35 percent have ambulatory difficulty, 30 percent have a hearing difficulty, 27 percent have an independent living difficulty, 17 percent have a vision difficulty and nine percent have a self -care difficulty. Over 55 percent of disabled people in Temecula are employed, and 42 percent are not in the labor force.
Drug abuse or substance abuse is defined as the use of chemical substances that lead to an increased risk of problems and an inability to control the use of the substance.
Substance abuse can be indicative addiction disorder and may stem from physical and mental health issues. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) conducts the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Based on the survey SAMHSA found, for the region including Riverside and Imperial counties:
• three percent of people needed but did not receive treatment at a specialty facility for illicit drug use
• six percent of people needed but did not receive treatment at a specialty facility for alcohol use in the last year, and
• 7.5 percent needed but did not receive treatment at a specialty facility for substance use in the past year.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 147
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a virus that weakens one's immune system by destroying important cells that fight diseases and infection. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final stage of HIV. The Center for Disease Control's (CDC) Atlas Plus program reported an estimated 9,414 persons living with HIV disease at the end of 2019 in Riverside County, 268 of those people had been newly diagnosed during that year ( https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/atlas/index.htm , accessed October 2021). New H IV diagnoses were most concentrated among those 25 to 34years of age.
Domestic Violence includes, but is not limited to, felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse of the victim or by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim. In 2020, the Temecula Police Department responded to a total of 213 calls related to domestic violence (open justice.doj.ca.gov, accessed September 2021). Of these domestic incidents, 20 involved a weapon and 193 did not.
Human trafficking is a crime that involves the forceful, fraudulent or coercive methods of entrapping a person, real or perceived, to exploit them for financial gain.
The exploitative nature can come in the form of labor services, involuntary servitude, enslavement, debt bondage or commercial sex acts. Human trafficking is extremely difficult to track; there is no recent or reliable prevalence rate to report. Between 2015 and 2019, the National Human Trafficking Hotline received the most calls from California, of all 50 states ( https://humantraffickinghotline.orgaccessed October 2021). Of national cases reported to the hotline the majority were sex trafficking. The United States' Department of State Trafficking in Persons Report published in June 2021, reports victims of human trafficking found in every state in the country and victims trafficked from every country in the world. Victims of human trafficking in the United States are most frequently trafficked from within the United States, Mexico, and Honduras.
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) explains Post -traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) can "develop after exposure to a potentially traumatic event that is beyond a typical stressor" and potential inducing events may include, but are not limited to, "violent personal assaults, natural or human -caused disasters, accidents, combat, and other forms of violence." Symptoms of PTSD can be debilitating. The U.S.
Department of Veteran's Affairs National Center for PTSD reports an estimated six percent of the population - eight percent of women and four percent of men - will have PTSD at some point in their lives.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 148
Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify and describe their supportive housing needs.
To determine the level of need and types of services needed by special needs populations, the City conducted surveys, consulted with local service providers and reviewed ACS and CHAS data. Supportive services required for special needs populations include case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, childcare, transportation, and job training provided for the purpose of facilitating a person's stability and independence.
In housing, accessibility modifications to accommodate persons with mobility disabilities may include, but are not limited to, wider doorways, no step thresholds, installation of ramps, grab bars, lowered countertops, and accessible hardware. The needs of residents with sensory disabilities are different from those with mobility disabilities. Individuals with hearing disabilities require visual adaptations for such items as the telephone ringer, the doorbell and smoke alarms. Residents who are blind may require tactile marking of changes in floor level and stair edges and braille markings on appliances and controls. People with low vision may require large print markings and displays, contrasting colors to distinguish changes in level or transition from one area to another, proper lighting, and reduced glare from lighting and windows.
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing Inadequate discharge planning and coordination contributes to homelessness in situations where people are released from public institutions or public systems of care without having an appropriate mainstream or supportive housing option in place.
A key step to preventing homelessness identified in the Riverside County Executive Oversight Committee on Homelessness' report Ending Homeless in Riverside County (2018) is to develop a coordinated discharge planning system for persons transitioning from care or case management of one department to another. The goal calls for the CoC to explore methods to increase communication and coordination among institutions.
In some cases, licensed community care facilities provide a supportive housing environment to persons with special needs in a group setting. According to the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division, there 19 licenses assisted living facilities in Temecula providing a total 513 beds, as of October 2021.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 149
For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs.
Link to one-year goals.
During the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan period, the Strategic Plan calls for the City to use CDBG funds to support public services for people with special needs services including, but not limited to those serving the elderly, children, veterans, and victims of violence. In the 2022-2023 Action Plan, the City will provide CDBG funds to the following activities addressing special needs populations:
Elderly and Disabled
• Hospice of the Valleys, Senior Assistance Program (41 people assisted) - public services funds
Domestic Violence
• Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center, Crisis intervention and supportive services for trauma survivors (13 people assisted) - public service funds • SAFE Family Justice Centers, Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families (73 people assisted)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 150
MA-40 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Barriers can include land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2022 Assessment of Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, the 2021-2029 Housing Element and market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are • housing affordability,
• the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable housing,
• concentrations of racial and ethnic minorities,
• access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors, and • housing issues.
These barriers are interconnected. Demand for affordable housing exceeds the supply, insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable housing resulting in renter households - and to a disproportionate extent Black, Native American, and Hispanic renter households - living in suboptimal housing conditions. Those conditions are housing cost burden, incomplete kitchens and plumbing, overcrowding, cost burden, inordinately great distances from employment centers, low access to public and affordable transportation, low homeownership rates and high exposure to poverty.
AsTemecula's population continues to change it should anticipate meeting the needs of a small and increasing proportion of the population in Temecula has limited English proficiency, an aging population and those posed by increasingly diverse population and degree of segregation trends.
In the last five years, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and preservation of affordable housing. This was the most significant public policy change impacting affordable housing and residential investment. While there are mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, these resources are finite and scarce.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 151
MA-45 NON -HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ASSETS
Introduction
Non -housing community development needs include economic development and improvements to public facilities. Special economic development activities must meet a National Object by addressing low- or moderate -income residents, slum/ blight, or urgent need and be an eligible activity per 24 CFR S70.203. Public facilities assisted with CDBG must serve low- and moderate -income residents or those residents presumed by HUD to be low- and moderate -income. Such facilities include senior centers, community centers, facilities for victims of domestic violence, facilities for treatment of persons with HIV/AIDS, and ADA improvements to public facilities throughout the City. During the implementation of the 2022-2026 Strategic Plan, the City will use CDBG funds to develop the local economy and address these needs and provide a suitable living environment for low- and moderate -income people.
To expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income people and provide a pathway out of poverty, the Strategic Plan and the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan includes public services programs. These programs include youth support by the Assistance League of Temecula Valley providing clothing and supplies to low-income students in TVUSD, the Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County providing before and after school care to students, and Voice providing case management and advocacy for foster children in Temecula. Further projects include housing counseling, case management and subsistence payments for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness, and services for the elderly and victims of violence.
There are several organizations that promote economic development in the Temecula Valley. The City participates with four other cities in the region in the Economic Development Coalition of Southwest California. The Corporation was founded in 1991 as a public -private partnership to promote a regional approach to economic development through job retention and development by increasing job opportunities for residents. Its mission is to expand the competitive position of the regional businesses in a global economy. The Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2) is a business incubator and regional center that works with new businesses starting up. The Chamber of Commerce, the Old Town Temecula Business Association and the Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association represent the various segments of the business community. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was designed to spur development and business opportunities in the Jefferson Corridor area.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 1S2
Economic Development Market Analysis
Business Activity by Sector
Number
of
Workers
Number
of Jobs
Share of
Workers
Share of
Jobs
Jobs
less
Workers
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas
821
374
3%
1%
-2%
Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations
4,550
6,842
14%
17%
3%
Construction
3,096
3,249
10%
8%
-2%
Education and Health Care Services
5,670
5,681
18%
14%
-4%
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate
1,788
1,879
6%
5%
-1%
Information
716
945
2%
2%
0%
Manufacturing
3,448
4,858
11%
12%
1%
Other Services
1,210
1,469
4%
4%
0%
Professional, Scientific, Management
2,947
3,041
9%
8%
-1%
Public Administration
0 0
0%
0%
0%
Retail Trade
4,055
8,001
13%
20%
7%
Transportation and Warehousing
1,271
540
4%
1%
-3%
Wholesale Trade
1,892
2,838
6%
7%
1%
Total
31,464
39,735
--
--
--
Table 48 - Business Activity
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Workers), 2017 Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics (Jobs) Labor Force Statistics
Number of People
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force
54,340
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over
50,245
Unemployment Rate
7.55 Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24
19.01 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65
4.51 Data Source:
Table 49 - Labor Force
2013-2017 ACS
Occupations by Sector
Number of People
Management, business and financial
13,820
Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations
1,735
Service
5,735
Sales and office
12,075
Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair
3,445
Production, transportation and material moving
2,255
Table 50 - Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 153
Travel Time to Work
People
Percent
< 30 Minutes
24,190
53%
30-59 Minutes
10,675
23%
60 or More Minutes
11,140
24%
Totalli
46,005
1 100%
Data Source:
Table 51 - Travel Time
f► ONOW i]II/_T61-i
In Labor Force
Educational Attainment
Not in Labor
Civilian
Unemployed
Force
Employed
Less than high school graduate
2,270
205
1,375
High school graduate (includes
equivalency)
7,685
525
3,060
Some college or Associate's degree
16,630
1,195
5,175
Bachelor's degree or higher
15,400
670
2,725
Table 52 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Educational Attainment by Age
Age
18-24
yrs
25-34
yrs
35-44
yrs
45-65
yrs
65+ yrs
Less than 9th grade
85 180
440
955
620
9th to 12th grade, no diploma
1,000
500
785
990
715
High school graduate, GED, or
alternative
3,960
3,195
2,905
5,390
2,745
Some college, no degree
3,950
4,370
4,385
8,530
3,165
Associate's degree
550
1,505
1,360
3,215
990
Bachelor's degree
785
3,200
3,680
5,480
1,815
Graduate or professional degree
100
1 1,080
1,605
3,980
1,375
Table 53 - Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Educational Attainment
Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Less than high school graduate
$39,663
High school graduate (includes equivalency)
$152,742
Some college or Associate's degree
$181,620
Bachelor's degree
$249,279
Graduate or professional degree
$377,121
Table 54 - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months by Educational Attainment Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 154
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
According to 2017 Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEND) data, the top five major private employment sectors in the City of Temecula include retail trade (8,001 jobs), arts, entertainment, and accommodations (6,842 jobs), education and health care services (5,681 jobs), manufacturing (4,858 jobs), and construction (3,249 jobs).
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community
The business community in Temecula relies largely on a skilled workforce. Residents of Temecula identified employment training asthe greatest need and highest priority in the city. Employers across all sectors, and especially those for which Temecula is a destination location or part of a larger logistics chain such as arts, entertainment and accommodations and manufacturing, require a well -functioning transportation system. At most, almost29 percent of stakeholder believe small business loans/grants and assistance of highly needed in Temecula.
LEVEL OF NEED FOR BUSINESS
EMPLOYMENT TRAINING
SMALL BUSINESS LOANS/GRANTS
START UP BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
COMMERCIAL FACADE IMPROVEMENTS
SERVICES
OOA 26% 40%
HIGH NEED MODERATE NEED LOW NEED NO NEED ■ NO OPINION
1 Figure 42: Resident Survey, Level of need for Business Services TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 155
HIGHEST PRIORITY BUSINESS SERVICE
UJ U
Q
Z
cr
EL �
w Ln
O W
z
d im
4 J N
Ln
LL
J r
bi
�_ }
N Q
U D
Ir r
UJ
En rL
J
0% 2a% 4G% 60% 90% 90%
Figure 43: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Business Services Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
The coronavirus pandemic has had a major and sustained impact on all sectors of the economy. It has both highlighted and increased the need for fast, reliable, and secure internet has increased across all sectors of the economy.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Act authorized $.2.2 trillion to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. The City of Temecula received a total of $1,193,916 in CARES Act funds. The City of Temecula was able to help over 30 small businesses with these funds through the Temecula Assist Program.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 1S6
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
Most employees in Temecula's civilian labor force have some post -secondary education, approximately 40 percent have some college or Associate's degree.
Generally. The skills and education of the current workforce correspond to the employment opportunities in the City. Of the sectors in the Business Activity table, just over half had more jobs than workers. The greatest demand for workers in the retail sector. More than half the working population in Temecula travel less than half an hour to work while nearly a quarter travel an hour or more to work.
Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.
Riverside County Workforce Development Centers (WDC) are the primary source of workforce training available to residents of Temecula. The WDC is operated by America's Job Centers of California. The Riverside County Workforce Development Board provides strategic direction and relationships for the WDC. The City of Temecula works with the Riverside County WCD and employers to secure on-the-job training when appropriate.
To foster growth of the high value tech sector the City together with the Economic Development Coalition of Southwest California, Inland Empire Small Business Development Center, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, Mt. San Jacinto College (MSJC), and Cal State San Marcos at Temecula (CSSMU) came together in 2013, to launch and operate the Temecula Valley Entrepreneur Exchange (TVE2).
MSJC opened a new state of the art campus in Temecula in the fall of 2021. This is a milestone for the region, as it is the first permanent campus of higher education in southwest Riverside County. This will improve access to skilled training and higher education for students and employers in the area.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)?
The City of Temecula was included as part of the CEDS prepared by the Riverside County Workforce Development Board (WDB) for 2019-2024. Every five years, the Riverside County WDB develops the CEDS for the region to present the current condition of the Riverside County economy and its impact on residents and businesses. The analysis identifies strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the regional economy by considering indicators such as unemployment, income, and education as well as infrastructure, business activity and economic competitiveness relative to other markets.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 1S7
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.
The City ofTemecula's CDBG program will support local economic growth by meeting extremely low-, low- and moderate -income and homeless residents where they are to improve quality of life and better position for access and engagement in economic opportunities. This will be achieved by supporting local nonprofit service providers, including housing services, and support of the development and preservation of affordable housing.
Discussion
The highly contagious nature of COVID-19 and the scale of illness and death has had significant ripple effects on the economy. In the spring of 2020, unemployment rates in the United States reached the highest levels since the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) began recording this data. According to the BLS, unemployment rates peaked at 16 percent in Riverside County and at 17 percent in Temecula in April 2020. While those rates have fallen to 7.6 percent and S.8 percent, respectively, as of August 2021, unemployment is still above pre -pandemic levels.
Health and safety guidelines and requirements continue to change asthe coronavirus evolves and the scientific community learns more about the virus. Employers and workers are required to constantly learn and reevaluate changing situations.
Another indication of the negative economic impact of the pandemic is the year over year decrease in California of personal consumption expenditures of over four percent from 2019 to 2020, as calculated by the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). The BEA calculated pre -pandemic growth in Riverside County's gross domestic product, as $8S million in 2017 to $96 million in 2019. However, State level calculations, which are more current, show the negative economic impact cause by the pandemic. According to the BEA, in 2020, California GPD fell for the first time in ten years.
Sectors of the economy such as arts and entertainment, tourism, and retail have been severely impacted by the pandemic. Prior to COVID-19 Temecula was experiencing a relatively fast rate of growth in accommodation and food service as well as arts, entertainment, and recreation. While employment in the retail sector had plateaued, it accounted for a large percentage of jobs prior to the pandemic and a significant number of jobs losses since the pandemic. Generally, jobs in these sectors have relatively low barriers to entry and pay lower wages. Extremely low- and low-income individuals and households in Temecula are facing even more tenuous situations than they before the pandemic. The City of Temecula is working closely with partners to release COVID relief funds as quickly as possible to assist eligible residents.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 1S8
50%
25%
0%
-25%
-50%
CHANGE IN INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
FOR TOP JOB SECTORS IN TEMECULA
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Data Source:
ACCOMMODATION AND
FOOD SERVICE
ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT,
AND RECREATION
MANUFACTURING
�RETAILTRADE
Figure 44
California Employment Development Department, Industry Employment in California Counties Data
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 1S9
MA-50 NEEDS AND MARKET ANALYSIS DISCUSSION
Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") Concentrations of individual housing problems are defined as ten percent over the rate at which one or more housing problems occurs throughout the City as a whole, based on CHAS 2013-2017 data. The threshold rate is 28.3 percent. There are four contiguous census tracts in the northwestern quadrant of the City where there is a concentration of housing problems these can be seen in Figure.
Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")
Concentration of racial and ethnicity minorities and low-income are defined as ten percent over the rate at which those variables occur throughout the City as a whole.
The threshold rates for each are as follows:
• Racial and ethnic minorities: S7.6 percent, and
• Low-income 31.3 percent.
There are two complete census tracts and a third census tract, most of which falls outside of Temecula where there is a concentration of racial and ethnic minorities.
These census tracts are not adjacent. One of the census tracts, near the center of the City, is also identified as having a concentration of multiple housing problems and low-income. There are a total of four census tracts where a concentration of households have low-income. Those census tracts are contiguous and households in three of those census tracts also have concentrations of multiple housing problems.
These concentrations are illustrated in Figure 46 and Figure 47.
What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? Generally, Temecula is comprised of predominantly White and upper -income neighborhoods. In S1 percent of the census tracts over half the population is white and in no census tracts are below 30 percent of the population white. There are no census tracts where fewer than 60 percent of households earn greater than 80 percent of AMI. The housing and economic indicators are generally consistent throughout the city.
Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? No communities were identified as having concentrations of housing problems, racial or ethnic minorities or majorities, or low-income. Each neighborhood throughout the City contains its own unique community assets including open space, trails, recreational areas, schools, job centers, retail, and restaurants.
Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 160
No communities were identified as having concentrations of housing problems, racial or ethnic minorities or majorities, or low-income. There are no readily apparent strategic opportunities to be addressed with CDBG, funds specific to any of these neighborhoods.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 161
I Mumka
Concentration of households with
multiple housing problems
City of Temecula
Concentration > 283%
u No
0 Yes
Miles
0 OS 1 2 3 4
Data Credits; HUD CHAS 2013-2017. Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garm in, (c) Open Street Map cc ntributors, and the GIS user community Figure 45: Concentration of households with multiple housing problems TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 162
Concentration of racial and ethnic minorities
I Mumka
City of Temecula
Concentration > 57.6%
No
Yes
Miles
a D.5 1 2 3 4
Data Cred its: ACS 2013-2017. Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Car min, (c� Open StreetMapcontributors, and the Gig user community
Figure 46: Concentration of racial and ethnic minorities TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 163
Concentration of households with low income
050500 043244 %
�� a43z47
049600 '
043216
043217
043267
043262
C43245
043264
043265
04n3222
043256 043237
043250 04324E
043252
043254
City of Temecula
Concentration > 313%
Miles
No 0 05 1 2 3 4
Yes Data Credits: ACS 2011-2015. Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE. Garmin. (c) GpenStreet Mapcontributom, and the GIS user community
Figure 47: Concentration of households with low-income
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 164
MA-60 BROADBAND NEEDS OF HOUSING OCCUPIED BY
LOW- AND MODERATE -INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate -income households and neighborhoods.
Broadband now.com is a widely used source of information about internet availability throughout the county and reports Temecula residents have several options for broadband internet service. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mapping service, Fixed Broadband Deployment, shows at least two providers offer ADSL, Cable or Fiber connections to over 98 percent of residential households with downstream/upstream speeds of 100/10 megabits per second (mbps). According to broad bandnow.com, the average download speed in Temecula is 166.0 mbps, based on speed tests conducted over the last 12 months.
The City of Temecula currently offers free WiFi in almost all City buildings. To stem learning loss caused by the need for remote learning due to COVID-19 and compounded by the digital divide, the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Unified School Department (TVUSD) partnered to develop WiFi gardens. These are places where students can access high speed WiFi at no cost. Additionally, TVUSD provided MiFi wireless hotspots to students upon request by a parent or guardian.
The City of Temecula's Resident Survey included four questions to provide deeper insight into broadband internet access in the community. Of the 126 respondents,113 had broadband internet access, most of those people have cable or phone/fiber optic, don't know the speed of their service, and pay between $76 to $100 per month for the service.
■ ■ D=
INTERNET ACCESS AT HOME
No
10%
Yes
9056
Figure 48 Resident Survey, Broadband Internet Access
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 16S
TYRE OF INTERNET SERVICE
do not
know
13%
AT HOME
(*I% DON'T HAVE INTERNET
AND USE A WIRELESS HOTSPOT)
Phone/fiber
optic
(Frontier)
4D%
Cable
(Spectrum)
4756
Figure 49: Resident Survey, Type of Broadband Internet Access
INTERNET DOWNLOAD
SPEED
5-24 mpbs 25.5Q
_ 8 mbps
7%
do not
know
3456
51-10a
mops
23%
1 a 1-5 a(
5aa+ mbps
mbps 22%
6%
Figure SO: Resident Survey, Speed of Broadband Internet Access TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 166
PRICE PER MONTH FOR
HIGH-SPEED BROADBAND
❑O NOT
KNOW
8%
INTERNET
$26-5Q
$1a0+ 14%
12%
$51-75
$76-1a0 29%
37%
Figure 51: Resident Survey, Cost of Broadband Internet Access Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
According to the FCC, 99.6S percent of Temecula households have access to at least two wired internet providers at their address. Throughout the City, residents are serviced by multiple internet service providers who offer high speed internet.
Providers include, Earthlink, Spectrum, Viasat Internet, HughesNet, Frontier Communications and Southern California Telephone Company. Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T have indicated plans to offer highspeed (SG) wireless internet access soon.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 167
MA-65 HAZARD MITIGATION
Describe the jurisdiction's increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.
Climate change has increased the prevalence and severity of natural hazard risks including drought, flash floods/storms, and extreme heat events in Temecula. Intense dry seasons and wind conditions during the fall months have contributed to wildfires in the hills in and around Temecula in recent years, which threaten lives and property, damage local ecosystems, and negatively impact air quality.
Temecula has a history of environmental stewardship, placing sustainability, energy and water conservation, and green building techniques among the City's highest priorities. In recent decades, City Council Resolutions demonstrate Temecula's commitment to open space, clean air, and modern building standards with the annexation of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, green building, and clean air.
The City has adopted the latest California Green Codes and added new solar facilities.
Temecula is in the process of updating its General Plan, which will include an updated Climate Action Plan. The City purchases clean, renewable, local energy produced at the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve Research 1 Solar project. This defrays costs to the city and residents and displaces over 4.5 metric tons of cardon dioxide annually.
Since 2008, the City Council has had a standing committee on sustainability and the City's Green Building resolution requires all new construction of City facilities to be designed and built to achieve U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC) LEES Certified Standard.
Describe the vulnerability of housing occupied by low- and moderate - income households to these risks.
Most of the respondents to the Resident Survey feel somewhat prepared for a disaster (Figure 52). Low- and moderate -income residents and special needs populations are especially vulnerable to the risks of climate -related hazards. The residences of low - and moderate -income households are more often in worse condition and thus are more susceptible to external weather conditions such as extreme heat. Likewise, elderly residents are at a greater risk during extreme weather events such as extreme heat events.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 168
NATURAL DISASTER
PREPAREDNESS
EXTREMELY
UNPREPARED
13%
SOMEWHAT
UNPREPARED
29%
EXTREMELY
PREPARED
12%
SOMEWHAT
PREPARED
46%
Figure 52: Resident Survey, Disaster Preparedness
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 169
Strategic Plan
SP-05 OVERVIEW
Temecula was built upon a strong base of civic participation. In 1989, when the City was incorporated, it was a small bedroom community. It has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activity since then.
The Strategic Plan is a guide for the City of Temecula to establish its housing, community and economic development priorities, strategies, and goals for the investment of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from HUD over the next five years, beginning Julyl, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026. The priority needs and goals established in this Strategic Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City's 2022 Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment Resident Survey and housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite) from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) S-Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period. Additional sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to low- and moderate -income people, persons with special needs and those at risk of homelessness.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Strategic Plan.
• Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure. • Promote the development of affordable housing
• Preserve the existing housing stock
• Provide public services for low and moderate income, special needs, seniors, and veteran residents.
• Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness.
Consistent with HUD's national goals for the CDBG program to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG- funded activities aligned with the following nine measurable Strategic Plan goals as elaborated in Section SP-4S:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 170
Goal Outcome
Goal Name
Category
Need(s) Addressed
Indicator
1 Public facilities
Non -Housing
Improve
Public facility or
and
Community
neighborhoods, public
infrastructure
infrastructure
Development
facilities, and
activities other than
improvements
infrastructure
low -/moderate -
income housing
benefit: 20,000
people assisted
2. Affordable
Affordable
Promote
Rental units
Housing
Housing
development of
constructed 80
Development
affordable housing
housing units
3. Housing
Affordable
Preserve the existing
Homeowner
Preservation
Housing
housing stock
housing rehabbed
30 households
4. Services for low-
Public Services
Provide public services
Public service
and moderate-
for low- and
activities other than
income residents
moderate -income,
low -/moderate -
special needs, seniors,
income housing
and veteran residents
benefit 2,000 people
assisted
S.
Services for
Public Services
Provide public services
Public service
residents with
for low- and
activities other than
special needs,
moderate -income,
low -/moderate -
including seniors
special needs, seniors,
income housing
and veterans
and veteran residents
benefit: 375 people
assisted
6. Services for the
Homeless
Provide public services
Public service
homeless and
for the homeless and
activities other than
those at risk of
those at risk of
low -/moderate -
homelessness
homelessness
income housing
benefit: 325 people
assisted
Table 55 - Strategic Plan Summary
Historically, the City of Temecula has used CDBG funding to support activities that meet one of the aforementioned goals or similar goals established in the prior Consolidated Plan. Over the next five years, the City will continue to support public servicesthrough CDBG public service grants and other local fundsthat meetthe goals of this Strategic Plan.
The City has established the following priority ranking system for housing and community development activities to be funded over the next five years:
• High Priority: Activities meeting a high priority Strategic Plan Goal are expected to be funded during the 2022-2026 period.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 171
• Low Priority: Activities meeting a low priority Strategic Plan Goal may be considered for funding if sufficient funds are available after high priority activities are funded, up to but not exceeding the five-year goal outcome indicator set forth in this Strategic Plan.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 172
SP-10 GEOGRAPHIC PRIORITIES
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
According to data from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates in HUD's eCon Planning Suite for the Consolidated Plan, the City's household median income is $87,115. Evaluation of maps generated through HUD's Community Planning and Development mapping system (CPD Maps) reveals that each of the Census Tracts in the City of Temecula has a median household income of at least $42,880, about 50 percent of AM I.
HUD allows CDBG granteesto implement certain activities such as initial construction or expansion of community facilities and infrastructure that benefit certain neighborhoods or villages (but not the entire City) provided that the entire service area for the facility or infrastructure is primarily residential and where at least 51 percent of residents are low- and moderate -income.
As a more recently incorporated City, Temecula neighborhoods do not face the same problems as older cities. There are, however, infrastructure and public facilities within older subdivisions of Temecula and areas with high concentrations of multi -family housing which would benefit from upgrades or expansion, especially in complying with federal changes to accessibility requirements.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 173
SP-25 PRIORITY NEEDS
Priority Need
Promote the development of affordable housing
Priority Level
Low
Population
Extremely Low-; Low-; Moderate
Geographic Areas
Citywide
Associated Goals
Affordable housing development
Description
Create new housing affordable to extremely low-, low- and moderate -income households. through development of
subsidized rental housing.
Basis for Relative Priority
According to ACS and CHAS data, 6,070 households earning 0- 80 percent of AMI are cost burdened— meaning those
households pay more than 30 percent of income for housing costs and 4,645 households are severely cost burdened — meaning they pay more than 50 percent of income for housing costs. Of the severely cost burdened households, 2,965 are renters and most (2,150 households) earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming
homeless.
The development of rental housing units affordable for low- and moderate -income households is rated as the highest priority need because over 53 percent of the City's households that earn less than 50 percent of AMI are renters who experience a severe cost burden, making these households the most at risk of homelessness. Additionally, responses to the 2022 Consolidated Plan Survey indicate the significant need for additional affordable housing units in Temecula.
Priority Need
Preserve the existing housing stock
Priority Level
High
Population
Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
Geographic Areas
Citywide
Associated Goals
Housing preservation
Description
As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. Low- and moderate -income homeowners, as well as owners of multi -family properties, may not be financially positioned to properly maintain their investments.
Homeowners and renters who have fixed incomes maystruggle to keep up their homes and be unable afford an increase to their rent.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 174
Basis for Relative Priority
The age and condition of Temecula's housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Over 90 percent of housing in Temecula has been constructed since 1980. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating /air-conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures.
According to CHAS data showing the year housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure:
Built 2000 or later 8,290 or 38 percent of the 21,600 owner - occupied housing units
Built 1980-1999 11,920 or 55 percent of the 21,600-owner occupied housing unit
Built 2000 or later 4,900 or 41 percent of the 12,045 renter - occupied housing units
Built 1980-1999 6,050 or 50 percent of the 12,045 renter occupied housing units
Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate -income
households is a cost-effective wayto invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low - and moderate -income households in the community. Housing rehabilitation and energy efficiency improvements together were high priority housing service reported by the Consolidated Plan Resident Survey.
Priority Need
Provide public services for low- and moderate -income, special needs, and veteran residents.
Priority Level
High
Population
Extremely Low; Low; Moderate;
Elderly; Veteran; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Persons with Physical Disabilities; Persons with Developmental Disabilities; Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions; Persons with
HIV/AIDS and their Families; Victims of Domestic Violence Geographic Areas
Citywide
Associated Goals
Services for low- and moderate -income residents
Services for residents with special needs, including seniors and veterans
Description
The City of Temecula holds this as a high priority and will support CDBG public service activities which help support TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 175
residents with low- and moderate -income and special needs, including seniors and veterans, as individuals and families, with individual and group development. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with
contributions from the private sector.
Basis for Relative Priority
The City of Temecula Strategic Plan for calls for a range of services for residents with low- and moderate -income and special needs, including seniors and veterans, as a high priority of the City. Analysis of available data and the Consolidated Plan Resident Survey revealed a high need for a range of additional services including, but not limited to, mental health services, services for abused and neglected children, healthcare services, services for survivors of domestic violence, services for persons with disabilities, substance abuse services, services for survivors of sexual assault, persons with HIV/AIDS, and other conditions.
The top five high priority public services, according to the 2022 Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, are as follows: anti -crime program, mental health, homeless, transportation, and
childcare services. Consultation with organizations providing services to seniors and veterans revealed a high need for a range of additional services. These needs will be addressed with CDBG and other public fund along with contributions from the private sector.
There were 7,600 low- and moderate -income residents of Temecula, including an estimated 4,185 residents with incomes at 50 percent of the federal poverty level (ACS 2017, 5-year estimates).
Approximately 18 percent of Riverside and Imperial County residents had mental illness and only about 12 percent of residents received mental health services, and over seven percent of residents needed but did not receive treatment at a specialty facility for substance abuse, in 2017 (SAMHSA).
In 2020, 213 calls reporting domestic violence were made by residents of Temecula to law enforcement (State of California Department of Justice, OpenJustice).
According to the 2013-2017 ACS data, 11,519 residents of Temecula over the age of18 have one or more disability.
As of 2019, 9,414 know they carry HIV and of those 268 were newly diagnosed the same year (U.S. Centers for Disease Control, Atlas Plus).
Provide public services to the homeless and those at risk of Priority Need
homelessness
Priority Level
High
Population
Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 176
Chronic Homelessness; Individuals; Families with Children; Mentally III; Veterans; Persons with HIV/AIDS
Geographic Areas
Citywide
Associated Goals
Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness Description
The City of Temecula holds this a high priority and will support CDBG public service activities which help prevent
homelessness and that support efforts for a structured path to stable housing for individuals and families who become
homeless.
Basis for Relative Priority
According to the results of the most recent data available from the 2020 Point -In -Time Homeless Count (PIT Count), on any given night in Riverside County, approximately2,884 people are homeless. To address incidences of homelessness in Temecula and to prevent extremely low-income families from becoming homeless, the City places a high priority on programs that provide homelessness prevention, street outreach, and rapid re- housing services.
Homeless services were identified by residents in the 2022 Consolidated Plan survey and in consultation with community stakeholders as both in high need and a high priority. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with contributions from the private sector.
Priority Need
Improve neighborhood public facilities and infrastructure Priority Level
High
Population
Non -housing Community Development
Geographic Areas
Local target area
Citywide
Associated Goals
Public facilities and infrastructure improvements
Description
Public facility and infrastructure improvements, including removal of architectural barriers for public right of ways in roadways, public facilities.
Basis for Relative Priority
In consultation with the City of Temecula Public Works
Department and the Community Services Department, a high level of need exists for activities such as public facilities improvements (including ADA improvements throughout the City) and infrastructure improvements.
Based on need and available resources and results of the 2022 Consolidated Plan Needs Resident Survey and input from
community workshops and consultations, the improvement of TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 177
neighborhood infrastructure and public facilities is rated as a high priority need for CDBG funds.
Table 56 - Priority Needs Summary
Narrative (Optional)
The City will incorporate the above goals along with specific needs identified from the 2022 Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, community workshops and consultations in considering funding applications for each of its five Action Plans covered by the 2022- 2026 Consolidated Plan.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 178
SP-30 INFLUENCE OF MARKET CONDITIONS
Affordable
Market Characteristics that will influence
Housing Type
the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based
The City of Temecula does not receive HOME funds. Any
Rental Assistance
TBRA funds will be provided through the Housing Authority (TBRA)
of the County of Riverside (HACR).
TBRA for Non-
The City of Temecula does not receive HOME funds. Any
Homeless Special
TBRA funds will be provided through the Housing Authority Needs
of the County of Riverside (HACK).
New Unit
Based on land and development costs, it is more cost
Production
effective to subsidize the development of affordable
multifamily rental units than to subsidize home purchase loans or the construction of single-family residences. In consideration of the lack of funding to completely address the need for affordable housing, the creation of new
affordable housing during the Consolidated Plan will focus on rental housing units where other sources of funds may be leveraged to bring the per -unit development cost to the CDBG program well below $100,000 per unit. The cost of
land, labor and materials affects the total development costs and the number of units that the City can support in any given year.
Rehabilitation
The City will be working with Habitat for Humanity in
assisting low- and moderate -income homeowners with the minor rehabilitation of their housing units and with owners of multi -family properties seeking assistance for the
rehabilitation of affordable housing units.
Acquisition,
The City will be working with developers that may propose including
the acquisition and preservation of existing housing units preservation
with sources other than CDBG.
Table 57- Influence of Market Conditions
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 179
SP-3S ANTICIPATED RESOURCES
Introduction
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July1, 2022, to June 30, 2026, the City of Temecula anticipates investing an estimated $2,779,910 of CDBG funds to support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG is subject to federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD's formulas for each respective program.
Expected Amount Available Year 1
Expected
Amount
Program
Uses of Funds
Annual
Program
9 Prior Year
Total:
Available
Narrative
Allocation:
Income:
Resources:
Remainder
Description
$
$
$
$
of Con
Plan $
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Based on
CDBG
Development
555,982
21,604
577,586
2,223,928
2021 FY
allocation
Housing
from HUD.
Public
Improvements
Public Services
Table 58- Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
Depending on the financing structure of a given activity, it may be advantageous for the City to use CDBG funds to leverage appropriate state, local and private resources, including but not limited to those listed below.
Federal Resources
• Continuum of Care (CoC) Program
• HUD Veterans Affairs supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
• Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)
• Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
• Youthbuild
• Federal Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 180
State Resources
• State Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program
• Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program
• State Housing and Community Development Permanent Local Housing Allocation
• Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
• Housing Related Parks Grant
• CaIHFA Single and Multi -Family Program
• Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
Local Resources
• Riverside County CoC
• Housing Authority of Riverside County (HARCO)
• Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA)
• City of Temecula General Fund
• City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program
Private Resources
• Federal Home Loan Bank, Affordable Housing Program
• Community Reinvestment Act Programs
• United Way Funding
• Private Contributions
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Land or property necessary to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan would need to be acquired using HUD grant funds or other resources. No publicly owned land or property is available for this use.
Discussion
Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG program, the City expects to spend approximately $S77,S86 of CDBG funds on housing, community development, public facilities, infrastructure, and neighborhood services activities that promote a suitable living environment between July 2022 and June 2026. It is anticipated approximately $382,992 of this will be spent on public facilities, infrastructure, and housing rehab projects and that $83,397 will be spent on neighborhood services. Anticipated projects include:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 181
• Before and after school programming,
• Homeless services,
• Housing rehab, and
• ADA modifications.
Assuming the continued funding level of the CDBG program, the City may allocate CDBG funds for economic opportunity activities to support the development and expansion of local small businesses during this next Consolidated Planning cycle through its Office of Economic Development with its microenterprise assistance program.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 182
SP-40 INSTITUTIONAL DELIVERY STRUCTURE
Table 59 provides an overview of the institutional structure through which the City will carry out its Consolidated Plan including the private, nonprofit, and public sectors.
Responsible
Responsible
Role
Geographic Area
Entity
Entity Type
Served
City of Temecula
Government
Economic
Jurisdiction
Community
Development
Development
Homelessness
Department
Non -homeless
special needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
City of Temecula
Government
neighborhood
Jurisdiction
Public Works
improvements
Department
public facilities
City of Temecula
Government
Non -homeless
Jurisdiction
Community
special needs
Services
neighborhood
Department
improvements
City of Temecula
Government
Economic
Jurisdiction
Office of Economic
Development
Development
Riverside County
Continuum of
Homelessness
Other
Continuum of Care
care
Fair Housing
Non-profit
Ownership
Region
Council of
organizations
Public Housing
Riverside County,
Rental
Inc.,
Habitat for
Non-profit
Ownership/
Region
Humanity Inland
organizations
Rehab
Valley
Table 59- Institutional Delivery Structure
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 183
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System The institutional delivery system in Temecula is high -functioning and collaborative — particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development activities that are implemented by the City. No institutional gaps were identified during the consolidated planning process. The gaps continue to be more in the lack of financial resources available to the City and its partners to meet identified needs.
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services
Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to
People with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy
X
Legal Assistance
X
Mortgage Assistance
X
Rental Assistance
X
Utilities Assistance
X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement
X
X
Mobile Clinics
X
X
Other Street Outreach
Services
X
X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse
X
X
Child Care
X
Education
X
Employment and
Employment Training
X
Healthcare
X
X
H IV/AI IDS
X
Life Skills
X
X
Mental Health
Counseling
X
Transportation
X
X
Table 60- Homeless Prevention Services Summary
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 184
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
The City of Temecula's public service programs will focus on the provision of services to address the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals, families with children, veterans and their families and unaccompanied youth through the CDBG public service grants awarded to local nonprofit service providers. Street outreach, homelessness prevention, and supportive services for special needs populations are high priority needs within this Strategic Plan and will be funded as part of the Annual Action Plan each year.
An obstacle to delivering services to homeless populations can be the homeless individual's willingness to seek assistance and housing. To address this barrier through direct outreach and engagement with linkages to available resources in the City and the region, the City has contracted with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. It will provide two deputies specially trained to address the needs of the homeless. The Homeless Outreach Team officers work to develop trust between the Sheriff's Department and the homeless individuals and provide referrals to the Riverside County Department of Social Services and local nonprofit service providers.
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above.
Temecula has a long track record of successful partnerships among public and private sector entities. The delivery system for the HUD grant program is no exception.
Communication and cooperation is strong between the City of Temecula Community Development Department and the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance and the partner agencies and organizations that administer activities. City staff continues to work closely with the other organizations to improve regulatory compliance, monitoring, cooperation and partnerships among agencies and technical capacity of organizations involved in project delivery.
The single most significant gap in the service delivery system remains the lack of available funding to support local programs in Temecula for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness. In Temecula, this funding is limited to 15 percent of the annual allocation of CDBG funds. The City is not a direct recipient of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds; therefore, most of the HUD funding to address homelessness is available through the Riverside County Department of Social Services and the Continuum of Care. State funding has been reduced with several years of fiscal challenges for the State of California and City funds for this purpose are TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 185
limited. Prior to the coronavirus pandemic HUD grants had declined over the last twelve years. CAPES Act funding has been enabled the City to respond where needs were most acute. However, it has been difficult to accommodate increasing levels of need in the community and increases in the cost of providing services to homeless and special needs populations.
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs.
To address the lack of resources necessary to support local programs in Temecula for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, the City continues to work with its nonprofit service providers to explore alternate funding sources and encourages the identification of alternate revenue streams. One source is the HUD funding through the Continuum of Care.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 186
SP-45 GOALS SUMMARY
Goal Name
Time
Category
Geographic
Needs
Funding
Goal Outcome
Period
Area
Addressed
Indicator
1. Affordable
2022-
Affordable
Citywide
Promote the
CDBG:
Rental units
Housing
2026
Housing
development
$0
constructed
Development
of affordable
80 housing
housing
units
Description: Support development of affordable housing by leveraging CDBG to optimize other public and private sources of financing.
2. Housing
2022-
Affordable
Citywide
Preserve
CDBG:
Homeowner
Preservation
2026
Housing
exiting
$250,000
housing
housing stock
rehabbed 30
Description: Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock households
occupied by low- and moderate -income households, renters, and owners.
3. Services for
2022-
Public
Citywide
Provide public
CDBG:
Public
low- and
2026
Services
services for
$172,710
service
moderate-
low- and
activities
income
moderate-
other than
residents
income,
low -
special needs,
/moderate -
seniors, and
income
veteran
housing
residents
benefit 2,000
Description: Provide lower -income persons with appropriate health, fitness, People
recreational, educational and other services, including, but not limited to, assisted
childcare, before and after school care and healthcare services to support the well-being of low- and moderate -income families.
4. Services for
2022-
Public
Citywide
Provide public
CDBG:
Public
residents with
2026
Services
services for
$145,420
service
special needs,
low- and
activities
including
moderate-
other than
seniors and
income,
low -
veterans.
special needs,
/moderate -
seniors, and
income
veteran
housing
residents
benefit: 375
Provide supportive services for residents with special needs, including, but not People
assisted
limited, to those services addressing the needs of residents with disabilities, domestic violence, substance abuse; HIV/AIDS; seniors, and veterans with appropriate supportive services, including, but not limited to, those related to health, fitness, recreational and educational services.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 187
Goal Name
Time
Category
Geographic
Needs
Funding
Goal Outcome
Period
Area
Addressed
Indicator
S. Services for
2022-
Homeless
Citywide
Provide public
CDBG:
Public
the homeless
2026
services for
$98'855
service
and those at
the homeless
activities
risk of
and those at
other than
homelessness
risk of
low -
homelessness
/moderate -
income
Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate housing
homelessness including, but not limited to, supportive services for the benefit: 325
homeless and those at -risk of homelessness, including homelessness people
prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. assisted
6. Public
2022-
Non -Housing
Citywide
Improve
CDBG:
Public facility
facilities an
2026
Community
neighborhood
$1,664,96
or
infrastructure
Development
s, public
infrastructur
improvement
facilities, and
0 e activities
infrastructure
other than
low-
/moderate -
income
housing
benefit:
20,000
people
assisted
Improve City of Temecula public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income residents or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income such as the elderly and disabled adults. The City anticipated averaging approximately one accessibility activity a year.
7. 2022-
N/A
Citywide
N/A
CDBG:
N/A
Administration
2026
$555,980
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD requires the City to represent Administration funds as a "goal" within the Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully allocated to goals
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 188
Table 61 - Goals Summary
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
The City does not receive an allocation of HOME funds.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 189
SP-50 PUBLIC HOUSING ACCESSIBILITY AND
INVOLVEMENT
Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement)
Not applicable. The Housing Authority of Riverside County (HACK) not have a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement.
Activities to Increase Resident Involvement
The Housing Authority maintains active resident councils at all public housing developments and includes resident members on its Board of Directors. The Housing Authority constantly seeks feedback from residents on improvements and planning documents to ensure activities are meeting the needs of residents.
The Housing Authority maintains a home ownership program for current public housing tenants. The program with its Family Self -Sufficiency Program to help households save money for a down payment through an escrow account.
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902?
No.
Plan to remove the `troubled' designation
Not applicable. HARC is designated as a high performing PHA.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 190
SP-55 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Barriers to Affordable Housing
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Barriers can include land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2022 Assessment of Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, the 2021-2029 Housing Element and market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are • housing affordability,
• the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable housing,
• concentrations of racial and ethnic minorities,
• access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors, and • housing issues.
These barriers are interconnected. Demand for affordable housing exceeds the supply, insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable housing resulting in renter households - and to a disproportionate extent Black, Native American, and Hispanic renter households - living in suboptimal housing conditions. Those conditions are housing cost burden, incomplete kitchens and plumbing, overcrowding, cost burden, inordinately great distancesfrom employment centers, low access to public and affordable transportation, low homeownership rates and high exposure to poverty.
AsTemecula's population continues to change it should anticipate meeting the needs of a small and increasing proportion of the population in Temecula has limited English proficiency, an aging population and those posed by increasingly diverse population and degree of segregation trends.
In the last five years, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and preservation of affordable housing. This was the most significant public policy change impacting affordable housing and residential investment. While there are mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, these resources are finite and scarce.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 191
Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing To address these barriers the City will work to take the following steps. • Investing CDBG into preservation of affordable housing and continuing to leverage CDBG funds to attract private and other available public resources, • Marketing CDBG-funded programs in high poverty areas in a way that is accessible to low-income residents,
• Promoting or targeting CDBG funded non -housing activities to high poverty areas,
• Promoting fair housing education for tenants and homebuyers, and landlord and realtors,
• Maintaining fair housing resource on the Citywebsite and maintaining housing and a community development resources list
Additionally, in 2018, the City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) ordinance, which addresses the need for affordable housing in three ways. First it created the conditions for the development of new affordable housing units in a range of sizes including micro units and efficiencies that may be beneficial to developmentally disabled adults. The AHO also removed barriers to affordable housing development by allowing multi -family uses at higher densities by right without a conditional use permit. The AHO established this zone on at least 100 acres throughout the City to promote inclusive living patterns with respect to the location of affordable housing outside of areas with relatively higher exposure to poverty.
The Citywill continue to workwith developers in accessing other funds to address the affordable housing needs.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 192
SP-60 HOMELESSNESS STRATEGY
Introduction
Preventing and ending homelessness is a HUD priority addressed regionally through coordination of strategies carried out locally by government agencies, community - based organizations, and faith -based groups. Consistent with this approach, the City of Temecula supports the efforts of Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) and its member organizations. The City participates in the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance which it helped to create. Through its HOT program, the County Sheriff's Department works with homeless individuals and refers them to the appropriate service providers.
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City supports local nonprofit agencies that provide outreach, and housing counseling to low- and moderate -income residents to prevent homelessness. The City is optimistic that this investment in outreach, assessment and connection to appropriate resources will significantly reduce the number of homeless. Through its HOT program, the County Sheriff's Department works with homeless individuals and refers them to the appropriate service providers.
Street outreach activities implemented by local service providers are a means to identify and bring forward individuals that are generally the least likely to seek out services. Street outreach plays a critical role throughout the County by homeless residents and connecting those residents with housing and support services. The CoC adopted the national best -practice coordinated intake and assessment model to connect individuals and families experiencing homelessness more effectively or at - risk of homelessness to appropriate services and housing interventions. Through dynamic prioritization, collaborative coordination, intentional resource utilization, equitable resource distribution, and regional service planning area prioritization, the Coordinated Entry System (CES) includes multiple service providers, a virtual "front door" and a "no wrong door" approach. Dialing 2-1-1 is a good first step for any individual or family that is at -risk of homelessness or that has become homeless. 2-1-1 representatives are skilled at connecting residents to the nearest service provider that serves as an "access point" for the CES.
Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
To end homelessness on a local level, the City through its involvement in Temecula Homeless Coalition and its partnerships with local nonprofit and religious partners is addressing the needs of the homeless. The City is participating with the CoC in seeking additional permanent housing that is closely aligned with supportive services TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 193
that ensure that newly created housing stability can be maintained. However, because the demand for affordable housing far outpaces the region's supply, the CoC continues to rely on its existing emergency and transitional housing system to address the immediate needs of Riverside County's homeless population. The City continues to allow emergency shelters and transitional housing in areas that the Zoning Code allows by right.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again.
This Strategic Plan provides for the use of CDBG funds to support activities implemented by local nonprofit organizations that provide services to help prevent and eliminate homelessness, including but not limited to, families at risk of homelessness, victims of domestic violence, special needs populations and emancipated foster youth.
Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education or youth needs.
An individual or family is considered at -risk of becoming homeless if it experiences extreme difficulty maintaining housing and has no reasonable alternatives for obtaining subsequent housing. Homelessness often results from a complex set of circumstances that require people to choose between food, shelter, and other basic needs. Examples of common circumstances that can cause homelessness include eviction, loss of income, insufficient income, disability, increase in the cost of housing, discharge from an institution, irreparable damage, or deterioration to housing, and fleeing from family violence. The most effective and cost-efficient means to address homelessness is to prevent episodes of homelessness from occurring in the first place.
This Strategic Plan provides for the use of CDBG funds to support activities implemented by local nonprofit organizations that provide services to help prevent homelessness. In Program Year 2022-2023 the City of Temecula's Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program as well as Community Mission of Hope will connect TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 194
homeless individuals and households with housing and other services and financial and food assistance to address and prevent homelessness.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 19S
SP-65 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards.
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. This strategy requires the City to implement programs that protect children living in older housing from lead hazards.
Overall, the City has a relatively new housing stock. Therefore, lead -based paint hazards are not an extensive issue in Temecula. According to ACS data, Temecula's housing stock (about 93 percent) was built after 1979, when the use of lead -based paint was outlawed, meaning that the residents of these homes should not be at risk of lead -based paint hazards. Only those units constructed prior to January 1,1978, are presumed to have the potential to contain lead -based paint. In these units, the best way to have reasonable assurance that lead -based paint hazards are not present is to have the painted surfaces tested.
To reduce lead -based paint hazards, the City takes the following actions:
• Include lead testing and abatement procedures, as required, in all residential rehabilitation activities falling under Strategic Plan Goal No. 2 for units built prior to January 1,1978.
• Educate residents on the health hazards of lead -based paint through brochures and encourage screening children for elevated blood -lead levels. • Disseminate brochures about lead hazards through organizations such as the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the City's residential rehabilitation activities.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?
Over time through testing and abatement, monitoring of public health data, and through public education, the public will have greater awareness of the hazards of lead -based paint to children. This will prompt homeowners, landlords, and parents of young children to proactively address unsafe housing conditions in pre-1978 units where children may potentially be exposed to lead -based paint hazards.
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
The City of Temecula require the dissemination of brochures provided by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency to all applicants as part of the transmittal of the program application. Any unit receiving assistance through the program that was built prior to January 1, 1978, is tested for lead -based paint. If lead -based paint is TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 196
present, appropriate abatement procedures are implemented as part of the rehabilitation contract consistent with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 197
SP-70 ANTI -POVERTY STRATEGY
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty -Level Families.
Poverty continues to be a significant challenge in Temecula and throughout Riverside County. According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, there are 8,697 Temecula residents living below the poverty level. Of these residents, 37 percent identify as Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, 33 percent identify as American Indian and Alaska Native, 15 percent identify as some other race, 12 percent identify as Black or African American, seven percent identify as Asian, seven percent identify as White, seven percent identify as two or more races, and 11 percent identify as Hispanic or Latino (of any race).
To meaningfully address this challenge, each of the goals included in the 2022-2026 Strategic Plan is aligned to support activities promoting the availability of affordable housing and provide essential services that directly benefit low- and moderate - income residents. In the implementation of the Strategic Plan, the City will prioritize funding for activities that most effectively address these goals over the next five years.
This strategy will emphasize using CDBG funds to help individuals and families rise out of poverty to long-term self-sufficiency.
The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in this Strategic Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty -level families by supporting • expansion of housing affordable to low- and moderate -income households; • preservation of decent housing affordable to low- and moderate -income households;
• a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness;
• public services for low- and moderate -income residents including the elderly, veterans, those with special needs and those at risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG funds;
• improved accessibility of public infrastructure and facilities, and • economic opportunity for low- and moderate -income residents who own microenterprise businesses (five or fewer employees) or are starting a new microenterprise business.
In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide a pathway out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. In California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CaIWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 198
provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
Temecula's desirable location in southwestern Riverside County makes it a high -cost housing area. Housing costs declined and became more affordable following the mortgage -backed securities housing foreclosure crisis. Home values have returned to pre -recession levels and are currently out of reach for some. National funding limitations on Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and long application wait lists for both conventional public housing and publicly assisted affordable housing limit the number of families in poverty that can benefit from these housing opportunities or programs.
The goals of this Strategic Plan are aligned to benefit low- and moderate -income residents to reduce the number of poverty -level families. For example, the goal to develop new affordable rental housing opportunities available to families earning less than 30, 50 and 80 percent of AMI will provide additional affordable housing options for families transitioning from activities funded under the Homelessness Prevention Services goal. The Affordable Housing Preservation goal will include activities targeted to families who own their residence but lack the resources to address emergency repairs or maintain the property in compliance with City codes and standards.
Addressing substandard or emergency housing conditions allows low- and moderate - income families to maintain housing stability, while also guaranteeing that all economic segments of the community live in decent housing. The low- and moderate -income residents, seniors and veterans and special needs services goals will fund activities targeted to families in poverty and other low- and moderate -income households with specific service needs. The small business creation and expansion goal will provide technical assistance to low- and moderate -income owners of microenterprise businesses (five or fewer employees) or those low- and moderate - income people seeking to start their own local microenterprise. Providing this range of targeted services allows low- and moderate -income residents in Temecula with opportunities to rise from poverty and become more self-sufficient.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 199
SP-80 MONITORING
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
To ensure CDBG funds are used efficiently and in compliance with applicable regulations, the City provides technical assistance to all subrecipients at the beginning of each program year and monitors subrecipients throughout the program yea r.
Technical Assistance
To enhance compliance with federal program regulations, the City provides an annual Notice of Funding Availability workshop to review the Strategic Plan goals, program requirements and available resources with potential applicants. After the Action Plan is approved, a mandatory subrecipient workshop is held to review program regulations in detail, to provide useful forms and resources for documenting compliance and to review the City's compliance procedures and requirements.
Additionally, individualized technical assistance is provided on an as -needed basis throughout a program year.
Activity Monitoring
All activities are monitored, beginning with a detailed review upon receipt of an application to determine eligibility, conformance with a National Objective and conformance with a Plan goal. This review also examines the proposed use of funds, eligibility of the service area, eligibility of the intended beneficiaries and likelihood of compliance with other federal requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the System for Award Management (SAM) debarment list, prevailing wage, Minority and Women Business Enterprise, Section 3 and federal acquisition and relocation regulations, as applicable.
Subrecipients are required to submit an audit and other documentation to establish their capacity, and any findings noted in the audit are reviewed with the applicant.
Eligible applications are then considered for funding. Once funded, desk monitoring includes ongoing review of required quarterly performance reports. For CDBG public service activities, an on -site monitoring is conducted once every two years, or more frequently as needed to ensure compliance. These reviews include both a fiscal and programmatic review of the subrecipient's activities. The reviews determine if the subrecipient is complying with the program regulations and City contract. Areas routinely reviewed include overall administration, financial systems, appropriateness TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 200
of program expenditures, program delivery, client eligibility determination and documentation, reporting systems, and achievement toward achieving contractual goals. Following the monitoring visit, a written report is provided delineating the results of the review and any findings of non-compliance and the required corrective action. Subrecipients normally have 30 days to provide the City with corrective actions taken to address any noted findings. Individualized technical assistance is provided, as noted above as soon as compliance concerns are identified.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 201
2022-2023 Action Plan
AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026, the City of Temecula anticipates investing an estimated $2.8 million of CDBG funds to support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG is subject to federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD's formulas for each respective program.
If Congress does not complete the appropriations process for HUD's FY2022 appropriation prior to the thirty -day public review process for the Draft Action Plan and final public hearing in April and Cityfunding is either increased or decreased from what is presented in the Draft Action Plan, no additional public review will be required. Instead, City staff will inquire of each agency with City Council -approved public services activities and determine if the agency will be able to implement their program with the budget change. Once the City has determined the number of agencies willing to proceed with their program, City staff will proportionately increase or decrease all agencies' grant awards.
Should additional CDBG funding become available during the program year through cost savings, increase in allocation, or dropped activities, the City will use CDBG funds to expand the scope of its multi -phased Old Town Sidewalk Improvement program or fund a priority need identified in its ADA Transition Plan. If additional funding becomes available for public services for the same reasons during the program year, the funds will be distributed proportionately among the approved CDBG-funded public services agencies. No additional public review will be required to take this action, because this would be considered a minor amendment to the Annual Action Plan.
For the 2022-2023 Program Year, the City will receive an estimated $596,645 of CDBG funds and the Consortia will receive an estimated $555,982. When combined with available prior year resources the 2022-2023 Action Plan allocates $577,586 of CDBG funds to program activities that will be implemented from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 202
Uses
Expected
Amount Available Year 1
Expected
Amount
Available
Narrative
Program
of
Annual
Program
Prior Year
Total:
Remainder
Description
Funds
Allocation:
Income:
Resources:
of Con
Plan
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Based on
Economic
CDBG
Development
$555,982
$0
$21,604
$577,586
$2,223,928
2021 FY
allocation
Housing
from HUD.
Public
Improvements
Public Services
Table 62 -Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
Available public resources to serve low- and moderate -income households will need to be distributed across the spectrum of needs and heavily leveraged when possible.
This means providing funds for housing rehabilitation, and the creation or development of new housing serving the target groups. The City will actively pursue additional State and federal funding sources to leverage CDBG Funds.
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Land or property necessary to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan would need to be acquired using HUD grant funds or other resources. No publicly owned land or property is available for this use.
Discussion
The City of Temecula shares overall responsibility for meeting the priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan with many agencies and organizations. The City is responsible for using CDBG entitlement funds to address the needs of low- and moderate -income residents. Other City departments and organizations provide services to low- and moderate -income residents by utilizing funding from federal, state, local and private resources.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 203
AP-20 ANNUAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals Summary Information
Goal Name
Time
Category
Geographic
Needs
Funding
Goal Outcome
Period
Area
Addressed
Indicator
1. Affordable
2022-
Affordable
Citywide
Promote the
CDBG:
Rental units
Housing
2023
Housing
development
$0
constructed
Development
of affordable
16 housing
housing
units
Description: Support development of affordable housing by leveraging CDBG to optimize other public and private sources of financing.
2. Housing
2022-
Affordable
Citywide
Preserve
CDBG:
Homeowner
Preservation
2023
Housing
exiting
$50 000
housing
housing stock
rehabbed 5
Description: Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock households
occupied by low- and moderate -income households, renters, and owners.
3. Services for
2022-
Public
Citywide
Provide public
CDBG:
Public
low- and
2023
Services
services for
$41,813
service
moderate-
low- and
activities
income
moderate-
other than
residents
income,
low -
special needs,
/moderate -
seniors, and
income
veteran
housing
residents
benefit 403
Description: Provide lower -income persons with appropriate health, fitness, People
assisted
recreational, educational and other services, including, but not limited to, childcare, before and after school care and healthcare services to support the well-being of low- and moderate -income families.
4. Services for
2022-
Public
Citywide
Provide public
CDBG:
Public
residents with
2023
Services
services for
$21,813
service
special needs,
low- and
activities
including
moderate-
other than
seniors and
income,
low -
veterans.
special needs,
/moderate -
seniors, and
income
veteran
housing
residents
benefit:127
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 204
Goal Name
Time
Category
Geographic
Needs
Funding
Goal Outcome
Period
Area
Addressed
Indicator
Provide supportive services for residents with special needs, including, but not people
assisted
limited, to those services addressing the needs of residents with disabilities, domestic violence, substance abuse; HIV/AIDS; seniors, and veterans with appropriate supportive services, including, but not limited to, those related to health, fitness, recreational and educational services.
S. Services for
2022-
Homeless
Citywide
Provide public
CDBG:
Public
the homeless
2023
services for
$19,777
service
and those at
the homeless
activities
risk of
and those at
other than
homelessness
risk of
low -
homelessness
/moderate -
income
Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate housing
homelessness including, but not limited to, supportive services for the benefit:180
homeless and those at -risk of homelessness, including homelessness people
prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. assisted
6. Public
2022-
Non -Housing
Citywide
Improve
CDBG:
Public facility
facilities an
2023
Community
neighborhood
$332,992
or
infrastructure
Development
s, public
infrastructur
improvement
facilities, and
e activities
infrastructure
other than
low-
/moderate -
income
housing
benefit: 7,287
people
assisted
Improve City of Temecula public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income residents or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income such as the elderly and disabled adults. The City anticipated averaging approximately one accessibility activity a year.
7. 2022-
N/A
Citywide
N/A
CDBG:
N/A
Administration
2023
$111,196
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 20S
Goal Name
Time
Period
Category
Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding
Goal Outcome
Indicator
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD requires the City to represent Administration funds as a "goal" within the Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully allocated to goals
Table 63 - Goals Summary
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 206
AP-35 PROJECTS
Introduction
To address the high priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan, the City ofTemecuIa will invest CDBG in projects that preserve affordable housing; provide fair housing services; provide services to low- and moderate -income residents; provide services to seniors, veterans and residents with special needs; prevent homelessness; improve public facilities and infrastructure; and facilitate the creation or expansion of small businesses. Together, these projects will address the housing, community and economic development needs of low- and moderate -income residents. 2022-2023 Projects
1. Operation School Bell
2. Before & After School Program
3. Housing Resource - Case Management
Program
4. Comprehensive Fair Housing Program
5. Senior Assistance Program
6 Crisis Intervention & Supportive Services for
Trauma Survivors
7 Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families Program
8 CASA Program
9 Homeless Prevention & Diversion Program
10 Critical Home Repair & Maintenance Program
11 ADATransition Plan Implementation
12 CDBG Administration
Table 64 - Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG allocation for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources. The City does not expect any projects directly furthering the goals for affordable housing development, and small business expansion and creation during program year 2022-2023.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 207
AP-38 PROJECT SUMMARY
7 Project Name
Operation School Bell
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Service for low- and moderate -income residents
Needs Addressed
Provide public services for low and moderate income, special needs, seniors, and veteran residents.
Funding
$7 271
Description
Clothing & supplies for low-income students in TVUSD
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
70 people assisted
Planned Activities
Gift cards to purchase shoes and clothes
2 Project Name
Before & After School Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Service for low- and moderate -income residents
Needs Addressed
Provide public services for low and moderate income, special needs, seniors, and veteran residents.
Funding
$7 271
Description
Round trip school transportation; activities before and after school
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
8 people assisted
Planned Activities
Scholarships
3 Project Name
Housing Resource - Case Management Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness Needs Addressed
Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 208
Funding
$7 271
Description
Provide case management for homeless to find housing; food pantry for those in need
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
150 people assisted
Planned Activities
Personnel
4 Project Name
Comprehensive Fair Housing Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Services for low- and moderate -income residents
Needs Addressed
Provide public services for low- and moderate -income,
special needs, seniors, and veterans
Funding
$20,000
Description
Fair housing education, training, technical assistance; landlord/tenant mediation
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
320 people assisted
Planned Activities
Personnel, rent, equipment, supplies
S
Project Name
Senior Assistance Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Housing preservation
Needs Addressed
Preserve the existing housing stock
Funding
$7,271
Description
Provide direct costs of hospice care for senior citizens and severely disabled
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
41 people assisted
Planned Activities
Personnel, rent, equipment, supplies
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 209
6 Project Name
Crisis Intervention & Supportive Services for Trauma
Survivors
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Services for residents with special needs, including seniors and veterans
Needs Addressed
Provide public services for low and moderate income, special needs, seniors, and veteran residents
Funding
$7 271
Description
Provide support and services to survivors of sexual assault and their families
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
13 people assisted
Planned Activities
Salaries and supplies
7 Project Name
Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Services for residents with special needs, including seniors and veterans
Needs Addressed
Provide public services for low and moderate income, special needs, seniors, and veteran residents
Funding
$7 271
Description
Victim awareness; case management; support for victims
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
73 people assisted
Planned Activities
Personnel
g
Project Name
CASA Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Services for low- and moderate -income residents
Needs Addressed
Provide public services for low and moderate income, special needs, seniors, and veteran residents
Funding
$7 271
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 210
Description
Case management and advocacy for foster children in
Temecula
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
5 people assisted
Planned Activities
Personnel and supplies
g
Project Name
Homeless Prevention & Diversion Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness Needs Addressed
Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Funding
$12 500
Description
Connecting homeless individuals with services and financial assistance
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimated
number and type
of families that
will benefit
30 people assisted
Planned Activities
Short term subsistence payments
to
Project Name
Critical Home Repair & Maintenance Program
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Housing Preservation
Needs Addressed
Preserve the existing housing stock
Funding
$50,000
Description
Provide Temecula residents with critical repairs to low and moderate single owner -occupied homes
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
5 households assisted
Planned Activities
Personnel time, construction rehabilitation costs
Project Name
ADA Transition Plan Implementation
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 211
11 Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Public facilities and infrastructure improvements
Needs Addressed
Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure Funding
$332,992
Description
Remove architectural barriers for public right of ways in roadways, public facilities.
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
7,287 people assisted
Planned Activities
Personnel and construction costs
12 Project Name
CDBG Program Administration
Target Area
Citywide
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
$111,196
Description
Target Date
6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
N/A
Planned Activities
Personnel
Table 65 - Project Summary Information
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 212
AP-50 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The 2022-2026 Consortia Consolidated Plan does not identify specific targeted geographic areas. All CDBG funds will be directed toward activities benefitting low - and moderate -income City residents.
Target Area Percentage of Funds
Citywide 100%
Table 66 - Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Not applicable.
Discussion
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City of Temecula is allocating 100 percent of its non - administrative CDBG allocation for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 213
AP-55 AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Introduction
The 2022-2026 Strategic Plan provides the framework for investing CDBG funds in the City. Promote the development of affordable housing and preserve the existing housing stocks have been identified as high priority needs. No new affordable housing will be created in program year 2022-2023. Approximately XX units of low- and moderate -income owner -occupied housing will be preserved by Habitat for Humanity with CDBG funds.
Based on evaluation of ACS and CHAS data, there is a high need for additional rental housing units affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. Of the households earning 0-80 percent of AMI, 10,715 are cost burdened households — meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing.
Furthermore, 4,645 of those households are considered severely cost burdened — meaning they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Within the severely cost burdened households, 2,965 are renters and most of those households (2,150) earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
The age and condition of Temecula's housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Over 90 percent of housing in Temecula has been constructed since 1980. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air-conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures.
According to CHAS data showing the year housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure:
• Built 2000 or later 8,290 or 38 percent of the 21,600 owner -occupied housing units
• Built 1980-199911,920 or 55 percent of the 21,600-owner occupied housing unit • Built 2000 or later 4,900 or 41 percent of the 12,045 renter -occupied housing units
• Built 1980-1999 6,050 or 50 percent of the 12,045 renter occupied housing units • Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate -income households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low- and moderate -income households in the community.
One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless
I7
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 214
One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Non -Homeless
0 Special -Needs
0 Total
0 Table 67 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance
The Production of New Units
Rehabilitation of Existing Units
5 Acquisition of Existing Units
Total
5 Table 68 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion
The City funds residential rehabilitation with CDBG. This program does not provide adequate to address the need in Temecula. State, other federal, and private resources are necessary to have a greater impact.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 215
. AP-60 PUBLIC HOUSING
Introduction
There are 184 units of assisted housing in Temecula,129 of which are Housing Choice Vouchers and SS of which are Project Based Section 8. As of September 2021,126 families including 83 of whom have disabilities and some of whom are elderly.
There are no public housing developments in Temecula. All public housing programs consist of housing choice and project -based vouchers administered by the Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR). All public housing programs consist of housing choice and project -based vouchers administered by the Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACK). HACK monitors all units to ensure they are in adequate condition, meeting the Section 8 Housing Quality Standards (HQS).
Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing
There are no public housing developments or units planned for the City of Temecula in the next year. HACK will continue to actively support and assist Temecula residents with Housing Choice Vouchers.
Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership.
HACR maintains active resident councils at all public housing developments and includes resident members on its Board of Directors. HACR constantly seeks feedback from residents on improvements and planning documents to ensure activities are meeting the needs of residents.
HACR maintains a home ownership program for current public housing tenants through its Homeownership Program. HACR also links its Homeownership Program with its Family Self -Sufficiency Program to help households save money for a down payment through an escrow account.
If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance.
Not applicable. HACR is designated as a High Performing PHA.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 216
AP-65 HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS
ACTIVITIES
Introduction
The City will invest CDBG funds during the 2022-2023 Program Year to address high priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan including provision of supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness, low- and moderate income, special needs, seniors residents, victims of violence, and persons with disabilities.
Homelessness Services
The January 2020 Point -In -Time Homeless Count revealed on any given night in Riverside County, approximately 2,884 people are homeless, up from 2,811 counted in a prior effort undertaken in January 2019. On January 28, 2020, 729 people in shelters and 2,1SS people without shelter.
To address incidences of homelessness in the City and to prevent extremely low- income Temecula families from becoming homeless, the City will place a high priority on programs that work to prevent homelessness or rapidly connect homeless individuals with housing and supportive services. To address this need, in Program Year 2022-2023 the City will support a continuum of services utilizing leveraged funds through the Riverside County CoC to prevent and eliminate homelessness including, but not limited to homelessness prevention and housing counseling programs, outreach, food and subsistence payment programs. These programs will be run by the City of Temecula and Community Mission of Hope.
Services for Residents with Special Needs
Analysis of available data and consultation with organizations providing services for special needs populations revealed a high need for a range of additional services including, but not limited to those concerned with developmentally disabled adults and victims of violence. To address these needs, the City will allocate CDBG funds for public service activities that will provide services for low-income seniors, victims of violence and children. These projects will be carried out by the Assistance League of Temecula Valley, the Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County, the Hospice of the Valley, Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center, SAFE Family Justice Centers, and Voices for Children.
Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs.
The City's one year goal to provide services to the homeless and those at risk of homelessness is one step in ending homelessness. Activities under this goal include outreach and assessment and will be provided through the City of Temecula's Homeless Prevention and Diversion program's short term subsistence payments and the Community Mission of Hope's Housing Resource - Case management Program's housing counseling and food pantry.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 217
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
The City of Temecula supports the efforts of the Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) and its member organizations that address homelessness. As described earlier, the City supports local nonprofit agencies who provide emergency rental assistance and housing counseling to low- and moderate -income residents to prevent homelessness. The City is not funding any of these activities with CDBG or other City resources, so no goals have been established.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again.
To keep families who are at risk of homelessness due to domestic violence housed, the City will provide CDBG funds to the SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Program to provide victim awareness, case management, and support for victims.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs The City participates in the Riverside County CoC. The Riverside County CoC Ten -Year Plan to End Homelessness included a goal to establish County wide protocols and procedures to prevent people from being discharged from public and private institutions of care into homelessness. The CoC is seeking to improve coordination among publicly and privately funded institutions of care and local service agencies to achieve this goal.
Discussion
With limited CDBG resources available, the City is investing in public service grants.
City of Temecula considers working to end and prevent homelessness a high priority TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 218
and will support CDBG funded activities that help prevent homelessness and that provide a structured path to stable housing for individuals and families who become homeless. The City is investing general funds through the Police Department budget to provide HOT Program officers that will connect unsheltered homeless individuals and families with emergency shelter, transitional housing, and permanent housing opportunities, as well as other services to address special needs such as drug and alcohol rehabilitation and mental health services. The City will continue to take a leadership role in the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance team meetings, where homeless providers will collaborate in addressing the homeless needs.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 219
AP-75 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Introduction
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Barriers can include land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2022 Assessment of Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, the 2021-2029 Housing Element and market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are • housing affordability,
• the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable housing,
• concentrations of racial and ethnic minorities,
• access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors, and • housing issues.
These barriers are interconnected. Demand for affordable housing exceeds the supply, insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable housing resulting in renter households - and to a disproportionate extent Black, Native American, and Hispanic renter households - living in suboptimal housing conditions. Those conditions are housing cost burden, incomplete kitchens and plumbing, overcrowding, cost burden, inordinately great distancesfrom employment centers, low access to public and affordable transportation, low homeownership rates and high exposure to poverty.
AsTemecula's population continues to change it should anticipate meeting the needs of a small and increasing proportion of the population in Temecula has limited English proficiency, an aging population and those posed by increasingly diverse population and degree of segregation trends.
In the last five years, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and preservation of affordable housing. This was the most significant public policy change impacting affordable housing and residential investment. While there are mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, these resources are finite and scarce.
Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 220
controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment.
To address these barriers the City will work to take the following steps. • Investing CDBG into preservation of affordable housing and continuing to leverage CDBG funds to attract private and other available public resources, • Marketing CDBG-funded programs in high poverty areas in a way that is accessible to low-income residents,
• Promoting or targeting CDBG funded non -housing activities to high poverty areas,
• Promoting fair housing education for tenants and homebuyers, and landlord and realtors,
• Maintaining fair housing resource on the City website and maintaining housing and a community development resources list
Additionally, in 2018, the City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) ordinance, which addresses the need for affordable housing in three ways. First it created the conditions for the development of new affordable housing units in a range of sizes including micro units and efficiencies that may be beneficial to developmentally disabled adults. The AHO also removed barriers to affordable housing development by allowing multi -family uses at higher densities by right without a conditional use permit. The AHO established this zone on at least 100 acres throughout the City to promote inclusive living patterns with respect to the location of affordable housing outside of areas with relatively higher exposure to poverty.
The Citywill continue toworkwith developers in accessing other funds to address the affordable housing needs.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 221
AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS
Introduction
The City's planned investment of CDBG funds through the 2022-2023 Action Plan will address obstacles to fostering development of and maintaining existing affordable housing; evaluating and reducing lead -based paint hazards; reducing the number of families living in at or below the poverty line; developing institutional structure; and enhanced coordination among collaborative agencies and organizations.
Additionally, this section will identify obstacles to meeting underserved populations needs and propose action to overcome those obstacles.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate - income people include lack of funding from federal, state, and other local sources, and the high cost of housing. To address this obstacle, at least in part, the City is investing CDBG funds in local nonprofit organizations to address the public service needs of those who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, seniors, and victims of violence.
To address underserved needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non - administrative CDBG funds in Program Year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people or people presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing In the implementation of the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG funds to preserve and maintain affordable housing through the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Program, which will provide minor exterior home repairs for approximately five owner -occupied single-family or manufactured housing units.
Actions planned to reduce lead -based paint hazards
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. Because nearly all of the City's housing stock was built after 1978, it is rare for the City to encounter lead -based paint hazards as part of its housing rehabilitation program. Should a hazard exist, the City will require lead -based paint testing and risk assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1,1978, and safe work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead -based paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 222
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families The implementation of CDBG meeting the goals established in the 2012-2026 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan and this Annual Action Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty -level families by:
• Supporting activities that preserve the supply of decent housing that is affordable to low- and moderate -income households;
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness;
• Supporting housing preservation programs that assure low income households have a safe, decent and appropriate place to live; and • Supporting public services for low- and moderate -income residents including seniors, victims of violence and those with special needs and those at -risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG public services grants.
In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide pathways out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. Additionally in California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CaIWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence and mental illness.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
The institutional delivery system in Temecula is high -functioning and collaborative — particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development activities that are implemented by the City support and enhance this existing institutional structure. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
Discussion
In the implementation of the 2022-2023 Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead -based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty- TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 223
level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 224
AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2022-2023 Action Plan, the City of Temecula will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate -income benefit for the CDBG program
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan.
0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities 0 Total Program Income:
0 Other CDBG Reauirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities
0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low- and moderate -income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low- and moderate -income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan.
100.00%
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 225
2022 Analysis of
Impediments to
Fair Housing
MDG
Aceoci�te�. Inc
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary........................................................................................................................ 2 FairHousing Issues......................................................................................................................... 2 Overview..................................................................................................................................... 2 Segregation................................................................................................................................. 3 Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse Community Factors .................................... 3 HousingIssues............................................................................................................................ 4 Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns...................................................................................... 4 FairHousing Goals..................................................................................................................... 4 DemographicSummary.................................................................................................................. 6 Segregation/Integration................................................................................................................. 11 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 11 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP)............................................. 20 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 20 Disparities in Access to Opportunity............................................................................................ 20 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 20 EducationalOpportunities........................................................................................................ 21 EmploymentOpportunities....................................................................................................... 25 Transportation Opportunities.................................................................................................... 36 Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities....................................................................................... 44 Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities........................................................... 48 Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity...................................................................... 51 Disproportionate Housing Needs.................................................................................................. 52 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 52 n
Executive Summary
The City of Temecula is located in the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County. According to the 2020 Census, Temecula is home to approximately 110,000 people. Temecula is located in a cluster of cities in Temecula Valley in southwest Riverside County. The other cities include Murrieta, Menifee, Wildomar, Canyon Lake, and Lake Elsinore. All have experienced tremendous growth in the past few decades, yet they remain separated from the metropolitan areas to the north and south.
As a HUD Entitlement Jurisdiction, the City is required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the City in identifying fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals in order to affirmatively further fair housing.
To identify fair housing issues, HUD requires jurisdictions to gather and analyze data. The data utilized in the analysis are from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS), HUD's AFFH Data and Mapping Tool, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data are generally from the most recent available years, with the exception of the ACS data, which are from the 2013- 2017 estimates in order to align with the data utilized in the Con Plan.
HUD also requires jurisdictions to compare the data for their jurisdiction to regional data. For the purposes of this analysis, HUD defines Temecula's region as the Riverside -San Bernardino - Ontario MSA. Because of Temecula's location in the corner of the region, one must be cautious to draw too many conclusions in comparing Temecula to the region.
Below is a summary of the fair housing issues, significant contributing factors, and fair housing goals, as well as an overview of the process used to identify the fair housing goals.
Analyzed data topics include:
• Demographic
• Housing
• Segregation/ Integration
• Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty • Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Fair Housing Issues
Overview
According to the data analysis, Temecula has a relatively high level of residential integration. The analysis did identify that all residents of Temecula, regardless of protected class status, have relatively low access to low cost and/or public transportation as well as relatively low access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods (see Table 12). Additionally, Native American, Black, and Hispanic residents of Temecula face additional fair housing issues, as described below. 2 Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is the primary organization providing fair housing assistance and support within the region. The table below summarizes the types of assistance provided in Temecula over the prior year.
Housing Assistances by Type
Type
Cases in Temecula
Affordable Housing Information
7 Arbitrary
1 Deposit
1 Eviction Assistance
9 Habitability
5 Harassment/ Illegal Entry
2 Lease/Rental Terms
15 Mold
1 Notices
17 Race
1 Rental Assistance
1 1
Repairs
8 Section 8 Information
3 Other
6 Segregation
• Compared to the region, Temecula has relatively few Hispanic and Foreign -Born residents (see Tables 1 and 2).
• Tagalog speakers appear to be concentrated in the southern and central parts of Temecula (see Map 4).
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse
Community Factors
In comparison to other race/ethnic groups, Native American residents, particularly those living below the poverty line, are the least likely to live near employment centers, have the highest unemployment rate of any race/ethnic group, have the least access to public transit, and experience the highest transportation costs (see Table 12 and Labor Force Participation and Unemployment table).
• The unemployment rate of Black and Hispanic residents is approximately double the unemployment rate of White, Non -Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander residents (see Labor Force Participation and Unemployment table).
• Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than residents living above the poverty line (see Table 12).
• Census tract 432.16 has a Low Poverty Index value of 37 and a Labor Market Index value of 37, indicating that residents in this area have high exposure to poverty and low levels of labor market participation and human capital.
Housing Issues
• Over half of renters in Temecula are cost -burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their income to pay for housing -related costs (see Housing Trends table). • Black, Native American, and Hispanic households are more likely than other households to experience at least one of the following four housing problems: lacks complete kitchen facilities, lacks complete plumbing facilities, overcrowding, cost burden (see the graph titled, "Disproportionate needs across households earning 1-100% AMI"). • Black, Native American, and Hispanic households are less likely to own their home than White, Non -Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander households (see Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity table).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns
• A small but increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The main languages spoken other than English are Spanish and Tagalog (see Tables 1 and 2, and Language Spoken at Home table).
• The population is aging. The proportion of the population that is over age 65 is increasing (see Table 2).
• According to the Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index, while segregation in Temecula remains low, it has been increasing since 1990 (see Table 3).
Fair Housing Goals
Many of the fair housing issues summarized above are largely driven by private market forces over which the Community Development programs have limited control. However, Temecula is firmly committed to promoting access to fair housing and affirmatively furthering fair housing through all of their programs and activities.
To promote fair housing, the following goals have been established for Temecula. 2 Goal
Program Marketing
Description
Temecula shall ensure that all HUD -funded programs are marketed in high poverty areas within their jurisdiction in manners that will be accessible to residents to ensure that low-income residents and high poverty neighborhoods have best access to all program activities. Marketing shall be conducted in accordance with the Ci 's anguage Access Plan.
Evaluation
To evaluate this goal, Temecula shall maintain documentation showing that it marketed programs in areas of high poverty and conducted such marketing in a way that clearly communicated the program to the residents in those areas.
Goal
Target Non -Housing Activities in Areas of High Poverty Description
Temecula shall use CDBG funds to carry out non -housing activities (such as public works, public services, and economic development) in areas of high poverty. This may include carrying out activities citywide, but promoting services in those areas or electing to target activities in these areas.
Evaluation
To evaluate this goal, Temecula shall report in the CAPER how its activities promoted anti -poverty oals and objectives.
Goal
Promote Fair Housing Education for Tenants and Homebu ers Description
Temecula shall fund and promote fair housing training for tenants, homebuyers and potential homebuyers to ensure that residents are fully informed of their rights as it relates to housing.
Evaluation
Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal
Promote Fair Housing Education for Landlords and Realtors Description
Temecula shall fund and promote fair housing training for landlords and realtors to ensure that they understand the fair housin requirements and rights of tenants and homebuyers.
Evaluation
Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal
Maintain Fair Housing Resources on Website
Description
In collaboration with the fair housing provider for Temecula, maintain a page on the City's website that provides access to fair housing resources and documents. Further, collaborate with the fair housing provider to promote trainings and other fair housing related events.
Evaluation
Review and update webpage resources annually with support from fair housing provider and maintain documentation of promoting all
trainings and events carried out by the fair housing provider in the jurisdiction.
Goal
Maintain Housing and Community Development Resources
List
Description
Establish and maintain a list of all housing and community development resources that is updated annually. This list may include services such as grant or loan programs for reasonable modifications and access to programs such as Meals on Wheels.
Evaluation
Review and update list on an annual basis.
Demographic Summary
Describe demographic patterns in the jurisdiction and region and describe trends over time (since 1990).
Table 1— Demographics, shows demographic information for the population of Temecula and the region. The region is defined as the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County. Table 2 — Demographic Trends shows similar data over time, going back to 1990. As shown in Table 1, Temecula is a majority White, non -Hispanic city in a region that is majority -minority. Over half of Temecula's population is White, non -Hispanic, while in the region, only one-third of the population identifies as White, non -Hispanic. Temecula has a smaller proportion of Hispanic/Latino residents compared to the region: approximately one -quarter of Temecula is Hispanic while one-half of the region is Hispanic. Additionally, Temecula has a slightly lower proportion of African American residents and a slightly higher proportion of Asian and Pacific Islander residents than the region. Over the last 30 years, both Temecula and the region have become less White. This shift has been primarily driven by the rapid growth of the Hispanic population, as shown in Table 2.
As shown in Table 1, the main country of origin for the foreign -born population in both Temecula and the region is Mexico. Five percent of Temecula's population and 12% of the region's population was born in Mexico. In both Temecula and the region, the second -most common country of origin for the foreign -born population is the Philippines —Temecula has a slightly higher proportion of Philippines -born residents than does the region. In both Temecula and the region, the proportion of the population that is foreign -born has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 2.
As shown in Table 1, the most common language spoken among those who speak English "less than very well" in both Temecula and the region is Spanish.' Nearly 4% of Temecula's population ' The ACS does not provide 5-year estimates for all languages spoken by the population that speaks English "less than very well" after the 2011-2015 dataset. Instead, for later years, data is provided for those who speak Spanish, Other Indo-European languages, Asian and Pacific Islander languages, and Other languages. There are 1-year estimates through 2019 that provide more specificity regarding languages spoken, but these estimates are not 2 and 13% of the region's population has limited English proficiency and uses Spanish as their primary language at home. Nearly 3.5% of the population of Temecula has limited English proficiency and speaks Tagalog. In both Temecula and the region, the proportion of the population that speak English "less than very well" has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 2.
As shown in Table 1, Temecula has slightly lower rates of individuals living with disabilities than does the region. The most significant disability type in both Temecula and the region is ambulatory: approximately 3.5% of Temecula's population and 6% of the region's population has an ambulatory difficulty.
As shown in Table 1, the age breakdown of the populations of Temecula and the region are roughly similar. Each have approximately 61 % of their population between the ages of 18-65, around 27- 28% of their population under the age of 18, and 10-12% of their population over the age of 65.
According to ACS data, the median age in Temecula is 34.9 years and the median age in the region is 34 years. Over the past 30 years, the populations in both Temecula and the region have been getting older. Table 2 shows the percentage of the population that is under 18 has been declining while the percentage that is over 65 has been increasing.
As shown in Table 1, in Temecula, the percentage of all family households that have children under the age of 18 living with them is approximately 52%. This is higher than in the region, where approximately 47% of family households have a child under 18 living with them. In both Temecula and the region, the percentage of families that have children has been decreasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 2.
available for Temecula. For this reason, Table 1 uses the AFFH data provided by HUD, which is from the 2011- 2015 ACS, with the exception of data for Spanish speakers, which is taken from the 2013-2017 ACS table S1601. 7 Table 1- Demographics
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region)
Race/Ethnicity (2017)
#
%
#
%
White, Non -Hispanic
59,324
53.58%
1,493,828 33.37%
Black, Non -Hispanic
5,221
4.72%
309,795
6.92%
Hispanic
30,533
27.58%
2,239,029 50.02%
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non -Hispanic
10,264
9.27%
298,740
6.67%
Native American, Non -Hispanic
442
0.40%
16,519
0.37%
Two or More Races, Non -Hispanic
4,705
4.25%
109,362
2.44%
Other, Non -Hispanic
233
0.21%
8,949
0.20%
National Origin (2017)
#1 country of origin
Mexico
5,414
4.89%
Mexico
554,782 12.39%
#2 country of origin
Philippines
3,280
2.96%
Philippines
62,880
1.40%
#3 country of origin
Korea
554
0.50%
El Salvador
32,115
0.72%
#4 country of origin
Vietnam
552
0.50%
China excl. Taiwan
26,784
0.60%
#5 country of origin
India
426
0.38%
Guatemala
23,668
0.53%
#6 country of origin
Canada
378
0.34%
Vietnam
21,373
0.48%
#7 country of origin
China excl. Taiwan
375
0.34%
Korea
17,364
0.39%
#8 country of origin
Colombia
339
0.31%
India
17,278
0.39%
#9 country of origin
Afghanistan
305
0.28%
Canada
17,106
0.38%
#10 country of origin
1.1apan
314
0.28%
Taiwan
9,935
0.22%
Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language (2015)
#1 LEP Language
Spanish (2017)
4,264
3.85%
Spanish (2017)
509,233 11.38%
#2 LEP Language
Tagalog
3,385
3.36%
Chinese
23,565
0.58%
#3 LEP Language
Other Indo-European Language
1,685
1.67%
Tagalog
17,869
0.44%
#4 LEP Language
Other Asian & Pacific Language
920
0.91%
Other Asian & Pacific Language
16,816
0.41%
#5 LEP Language
Vietnamese
660
0.66%
Other Indo-European Language
16,222
0.40%
#6 LEP Language
Chinese
650
0.65%
Vietnamese
13,764
0.34%
#7 LEP Language
West Germanic Language
555
0.55%
Korean
11,881
0.29%
#8 LEP Language
Korean
470
0.47%
Other & Unspecified Language
9,738
0.24%
#9 LEP Language
Other & Unspecified Language
360
0.36%
Slavic Language
2,041
0.05%
#10 LEP Language
French
355
0.35%
West Germanic Language
1,723
0.04%
Disability Type (2017)
Hearing difficulty
2,727
2.46%
134,692
3.01%
Vision difficulty
1,314
1.19%
98,573
2.20%
Cognitive difficulty
3,236
2.92%
185,324
4.14%
Ambulatory difficulty
3,942
3.56%
264,490
5.91%
Self -care difficulty
1,639
1.48%
110,137
2.46%
Independent living difficulty
3,197
2.89%
187,680
4.19%
Sex (2017)
Male
54,040
48.81%
2,226,881 49.75%
Female
56,682
51.19%
2,249,341 50.25%
Age (2017)
Under 18
31,138
28.12%
1,187,444 26.53%
18-64
68,154
61.55%
2,746,625 61.36%
65+
11,430
10.32 %
542,153 12.11 %
Family Type (2017)
Families with children
14,043
51.85%
468,086 46.99%
Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except family type, which is out of total families.
Note 2: 10 most populous places of birth and
languages at the jurisdiction level may not be the same as the 10 most populous at the Region level, and are thus labeled separately.
Note 3: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates; U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American
Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, accessed through the HUD AFFH Tool, Table 1, Version AFFHT0006, Released July 10, 2020.
Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details ( www.hudexchanae.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation) .
Table 2 - Democraohic Trends
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction) I Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region) 1990 2000 2010 Current (2017) 1990 2000 2010 Current (2017) Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # %
White, Non -Hispanic
19,366 80.23% 46,288 69.28% 57,816 57.7511* 59,324 13.58% 1,615,830 62.41% 1,540,776 47.33% 1,546,666 36.61% 1,493,828 33.37% Black, Non -Hispanic
305 1.26% 2,777 4.16% 4,802 4.80% 5,221 4.72 .
168,731 6.52% 263,322 8.09% 336,944 7.98% 309,795 6.92% Hispanic
3,505 14.52% 12,161 18.20% 24,232 24.21% 30,533 27.58%
685,672 26.48% 1,228,683 37.75% 1,996,402 47.25% 2,239,029 50.02% Asian or Pacific Islander, Non -Hispanic
579 2.40% 4,298 6.43% 11,855 11.84% 10,264 9.27%
93,331 3.60% 164,035 5.04% 298,585 7.07% 298,740 6.67%
Native American, Non -Hispanic
297 1.23% 951 1.42% 1,179 1.18% 442 0.40%
18,007 0.70% 36,061 1.11% 36,077 0.85% 16,519 0.37%
National Origin
Foreign -born 1 2,361 9.82% 7,817 11.70% 14,577 14.56% 17,152 15.49%1 360,666 13.93% 612,354 18.81% 904,558 21.41% 956,427 21.37% LEP
Limited English Proficiency 1 1,542 6.42% 3,891 5.82% 6,989 6.98% 7,997 7.70%1 252,012 9.73% 462,538 14.21% 660,791 15.64% 624,427 15.00% Sex
Male
12,164 50.62% 33,162 49.63% 49,085 49.03% 54,040 48.81% 1,294,274 50.00% 1,618,466 49.73% 2,101,083 49.73% 2,226,881 49.75% Female
11,868 49.38% 33,653 50.37% 51,026 50.97% 56,682 51.19% 1,294,518 50.00% 1,636,316 50.27% 2,123,768 50.27% 2,249,341 50.25% Age
Under 18
7,528 31.33% 23,439 35.08% 30,381 30.35% 31,138 28.12%
771,845 29.81% 1,044,686 32.10% 1,214,696 28.75% 1,187,444 26.53% 18-64
14,770 61.46% 38,692 57.91% 61,451 61.38% 68,154 61.55% 1,539,215 59.46% 1,869,817 57.45% 2,570,221 60.84% 2,746,625 61.36% 65+
1,733 7.21% 4,684 7.01% 8,278 8.27% 11,430 10.32%
277,732 10.73% 340,280 10.45% 439,934 10.41% 542,153 12.11% Family Type
Families with children 1 3,723 56.68% 7,030 62.39% 14,674 56.63% 14,043 51.85%1 350,701 53.60% 266,840 54.97% 500,062 50.99% 468,086 46.99% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year, except family type, which is out of total families.
Note 2: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-1017 American Community Survey S-year Estimates; HUD AFFH Tool, Table 2, Version AFFHT0006, Released July 10, 1020.
Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details ( www.hudexchanae.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation) .
Describe housing patterns in the jurisdiction and region, including tenure, cost burden, and the location of renters and owners.
The Housing Trends table, below, shows data on housing tenure and cost burden for both Temecula and the region. These data are from the 2008-2012 and 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. In both Temecula and the region as a whole, the number of housing units is increasing, and the majority of housing is owner -occupied. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, however, the share of renter occupied housing increased in both Temecula and the region. In Temecula, this was due to faster growth in rental housing relative to the growth of owner -occupied housing. In the region, the number of renter -occupied units increased while the number of owner -occupied housing units decreased over this period.
Over half of all renters in Temecula and in the region are cost -burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their monthly income to pay for housing -related costs. The proportion of homeowners who are cost -burdened is lower: approximately one-third of homeowners in Temecula and the region pay more than 30% of their income for housing. Over the five-year period between 2012- 2017, the number of cost -burdened homeowners decreased significantly, perhaps reflecting the recovery from the Great Recession. For renters over this same period, the absolute number of renters who are cost -burdened rose even as the percentage of all renters who are cost -burdened decreased slightly.
0 Table - Housing Trends
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region)
2012
2017
2012
2017
Tenure
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
Occupied Housing Units
30,880
33,644
1,276,316
1,335,366
Owner -Occupied
20,750
67.20%
21,600
64.20%
834,740
65.40%
832,117
62.31%
Renter -Occupied
10,130
32.80%
12,044
35.80%
441,576
34.60%
503,249
37.69%
Cost Burdened Households
All Units
15,841
51.30%
13,061
38.82%
616,461
48.30%
561,328
42.04%
Owner -Occupied Units
10,188
49.10%
6,798
31.47%
363,112
43.50%
279,789
33.62%
Renter -Occupied Units
5,622
55.50%
6,263
52.00%
253,023
57.30%
281,539
55.94%
Note 1: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008-2012 and 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Map 16 — Housing Tenure includes two maps showing the distribution of renter households in Temecula and the region. The darker shaded areas have a higher proportion of renter households.
The maps show a high concentration of renter households in the western portion of the jurisdiction.
In the region, there are concentrations of renters in the southwest, as well as in Census tracts in the central and northern part of the region.
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool AFFHT0006 i County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bur
Name: Map 16 - Housing Tenure
Description: Housing Tenure by Renters with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version:AFFHT0006
— —
Legend
o i zmi
N
Jurisdiction
/
Region
TRACT
created: 11/29/2021
R/ ECAP
Percent Households who are
Renters
< 22.09 %
22.09 % - 36.92 %
36.92 % - 53.45 %
53.45 % - 73.4 %
73.4%-100.0%
Percent Households who are
Renters: Data not Available
10 Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
TRACT
Percent Households who are
Renters
< 22.09
22.09 % - 36.92
36.92 % - 53.45
53.45 % - 73.4
73.4%-100.0%
Percent Households who are
Renters: Data not Available
Name: Map 16 - Housing Tenure
Description: Housing Tenure by Renters with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Seg regation/1 nteg ration
Analysis
Describe and compare segregation levels in the jurisdiction and region.
Identify the racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of segregation. Explain how these segregation levels have changed over time (since 1990).
Table 3 — Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends shows how segregated or integrated various racial/ethnic groups are in Temecula and the region using a Dissimilarity Index, which is calculated using data from the 2010 Decennial Census. The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which two groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation), values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.
As Table 3 shows, Temecula has low levels of segregation between White and Black, White and Hispanic, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents. Hispanic and White residents are the most integrated according to this metric, while Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents are the least integrated. In comparison, the region as a whole has more moderate levels of segregation 11 between these racial/ethnic groups, with Black and White residents experiencing the highest degree of segregation. Over the last few decades, as Temecula and the region have become less White and more Hispanic (as shown in Table 2), they have also become more segregated overall.
This is evident in Table 3, which shows increasing Dissimilarity Index values for all groups in both Temecula and the region.
Table 3 - Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region)
Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index
1990
2000 2010
Current
1990 2000 2010 Current
Non-White/White
1.27 10.17 15.87
18.06 32.92 38.90 38.95 41.29
Black/White
3.98 15.06 19.88
22.77 43.74 45.48 43.96 47.66
Hispanic/White
0.59 11.63 16.07
19.17 35.57 42.40 42.36 43.96
Asian or Pacific Islander/White
3.07 9.97 19.80
24.88 33.17 37.31 38.31 43.07
Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census, accessed through the HUD AFFH Tool, Table 3, Version AFFHT0006, Released July 10, 2020.
Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details ( www.hudexchanae.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentationl .
Identify areas with relatively high segregation and integration by race/ethnicity, national origin, or LEP group, and indicate the predominant groups living in each area. Discuss how patterns of segregation have changed over time (since 1990).
Map 1- Race/Ethnicity shows the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups in Temecula and the region -each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by different colored dots. Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trends shows the same distribution at three different points in the past: 1990, 2000, and 2010. In these maps there are no apparent concentrations or separation of colored dots in Temecula, indicating that residents of different racial/ethnic groups in the City experience high levels of residential integration and have for the past few decades.
In the region, by comparison, Map 1 shows some areas of racial/ethnic concentration that align with the dissimilarity indices showing higher levels of segregation in the region than in Temecula.
While the maps are somewhat hard to read at this scale, there are areas on Map 1 where orange dots (representing White, Non -Hispanic residents) are clustered with few people of other racial/ethnic groups present. Map 2 shows the changing demographics over time, with an increasing number of Hispanic residents, represented by blue dots on the map, concentrated in certain parts of the region.
12 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Legend
�s�II1�L, r• ~:, •� '' ••�'. �.S .. 0 1 2.1
,v`" •� f rye .•k a •+ ;a• Jurisdiction
AFFHT0006 I County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of ... _ f I Name: Map 1 - Race/Ethnicity
Description: Current race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Region
+ Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non -Hispanic
Black, Non -Hispanic
Its Native American, Non-
•�'' Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non -Hispanic
r r+7
itq`Muiti-racial, Non -Hispanic
TRACT
RECAP
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING
HOUSING0
FAIR
Mau VxAalluns Mxp Irenres •
® I r']Cnd TOC
Map fnln ® TOC
+
- 'tiK!y
Riversid�San Bennardino-pntario,
JurisdleNnn
CA CBSA
me—:
Map 1 - Race/Ethniclty
Descnption:
Region
Gunent race/ethnicity dot density
-
- -
map far Jurisdiction and Region with
R/ECAPs
Damagraphics 2010
-
1 Dot -100 People
Temecula (CDBG)
- _White, Non Hispanic
S
Region:
qµ
F' Black, Non -Hispanic
-
Riverside -San naN Berino-Ontario,
- ..
CA
Nffiive Amerlcen, Non -
_ - r
Date Ypreian:
Di
ii As1an1Pan1hn Islander, Nort-
AFFHT0006
T Hispania
Hiapanic
�..
Other, Non -Hispanic
Muhl-rao al, Nan -Hispanic
-
TRACT
�i
J I ticllan
AFFhT00a6i Ead, HEI
13 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool U 1
2mi
Legend
.�°' •
w 4
Jurisdiction
6 +
• 1
Region
• + • • +
Demographics 1990
+
1 Dot = 75
Jr 4 White, Non -Hispanic
J +
Black, Non -Hispanic
i
•
Native American, Non-
' r
.. %,.
.Hispanic
`
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
• •4 [
Hispanic
Hispanic
•� +
TRACT
R/ECAP
* 'D
AFFHT0006 I County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of ...
to created:
11/29/2021
Name: Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trends
Description: Past race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool a. e h ',att"[
fiend
.�°" 'i �+ [ _ ��+�•
,�
Jurisdiction
�'
•
Region
�'
[ • s*i ti '
Demographics 2000
1 Dot = 75
• if{ : k * "
White, Non -Hispanic
16 r •i i' ± `�i
Black, Non -Hispanic
_•
• �• r
r .
- Native American, Non-
e'
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
• • ti ;
._
1•.k Hispanic
• ' ~
,�, Hispanic
+
TRACT
•
w ,
R/ECAP
FFHT0006 County of Riverside, SanG_IS, Bureau of * • D
Ltecret.d: 11/29/2021
t .
Name: Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trends
Description: Past race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
14 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool c :_.�
to - ti • i ••a•.
.
Legend
2.1 ` •
•��
•
F
€ ,v�. ; •
- _ ' + •
Jurisdiction
..
•±
•� of
.'
• Region
IF
•�
+ ,y
}'y ••ti
•.�
+
••• •
.. 1-«� S}r }r
Demographics 2010
�k.
' w ' ;•.� •• ,• },
White, Non -Hispanic
• , •�, ; ' ti • :.�'� ti ��' •�
Black, Non -Hispanic
. • r
« ~ •
• '
« •�.•
'`
7ti! Native American, Non-
• • •_ •
Hispanic
r r Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
+ • ���
Hispanic
.� •�.
Hispanic
TRACT
TRACT
• • •
R/ECAP
.
AFFHT0006 County of Riverside, San 'IS, Bureau of...
11/29/2021
D
to created:
Name: Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trends
Description: Past race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
HOUSING0 AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR
i.^ap varies ons -
Mafia hfo ® rCC
Legend TOC
_
-
Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, Juhstliction
CA CBSA I�
Name:
`
Map 2 - RwalEthnicity Trends
®
Variati on: Re\\9iPn
Fiace/Ethnicity Trends, 1990 IJ
-
Description:
Past race/ethnicity dot dons" map DsmograPhice 100
- -
forJurisoctlon and Region With 1 Dot= 10o People
- _
R/ECAPs White. Non -Hispanic
Jurisdiction: Black, Nan-Hlapanic
- -
Temwula(GDBG) Nab-Amerlcan,Non-
F
-
Region: Hlspanic
Riverside-Sain Semardl -Ontario, Asiar/Pa ific i91ar1der. Nor - CA Hispanic
-
Data Version: R"' Hispanic
. ..
- -
AFFHT0006
- -
TRACT
RlECAP
.1.nsaic�n 4, �
AFFHTOW5 Emi, HE J
15 AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING
Map Vanauons— Man Tien -
® Legend TOG
Map In!o
Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario,
CA CB5A
Juristliction
Name:
Map 2 - Race/Ethr icny Trends
®
Varia tion:
Region
RaceVEthnicity Tinands, 2000
Description:
_
Past mWethnicity dot density map
Demographic. 2000
for Jurisdiction and Region with
1 oot = 100 People
-.
- R/ECAPs
While. Non -Hispanic
- Jurisdiction:
t-' Black, Non -Hispanic
Temecula (CDBG)
Native Amartren, Non-
-
- Region!
n=t' Hispania
Riverside-5an Bernardino -Ontario,
AsianlPaelfic Islander. Nor -
CA
z Hispanic
- Date Version:
,� Hispanic
AFFHT0006
TRACT
RECAP
AFFHf90u6 i f-sR, HEI
M aa'Ji .n r -
Mao IMP ® TIC
+
� r
awadtouan
Rayjon
�
. . .
-�'- R:;.•
aernngraehlca Y470
I I:•il iw: Prvppa
5'1File, Non F4apa!Yc
Black. Non-HiaWc
Ha+n'a A!wlcart
KSW.
A&W U 40C lit$r4s!. NPn-
Hqp�
Yri WsPar.
•-d'
_ J .
TRACT
t e
Ph-
r
Map 3 — National Origin shows the distribution of foreign -born residents in Temecula and the region. Each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored dots represent different countries of birth, for the 5 most populous groups of foreign -born residents. The even distribution of dots on the Temecula map indicates that foreign -born residents in the city experience high levels of residential integration. In the region, by comparison, there are concentrations of residents born in Mexico in certain areas, as indicated by the dense concentrations of orange dots. 16 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Lend
�•�Il�x. • + ' r . 0 . 1 2.1
^`=u,.,,,.v`" • • - Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
• .• 5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
• • • 13 Mexico
• Philippines
• Other South Eastern Asia
' ;4� Other Central America
• , P India
• • TRACT
j R/ECAP
AFFHT0006 I County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of ... D L�.reated: 11/29/2021 Name: Map 3 - National Origin
Description: Current national origin (5 most populous) dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
1 �tii
r
AFFta=1
teaenn W
d4+i4 rMn
Reglon
Naf�l Q"h [Ppglpn] Crop
m i pnpulauy
7f 1- :W P_-je
F.1ar,�,o
•Phappi s
f41w Canrral Angnca
Ft 531vado
41hor Soulh Easimn A3lu
rFutcr
According to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (ACS), shown in the table below ("Language Spoken at Home"), 23.8% of Temecula residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 7.5% that speak English less than "very well".
Of those who speak English less than "very well", the largest groups are those that speak Spanish (3.9% of the population) and Asian/Pacific Islander languages (2.8% of the population). According 17 to Map 4 - LEP (below), Tagalog is the primary Asian/Pacific Islander language spoken by those with Limited English Proficiency.
Table - Language Spoken at Home
Temecula, CA Jurisdiction
Number
Percent
Population 5 years of age and over
105,677
100.0
English only
80,578
76.2 Language other than English
25,099
23.8 Speak English less than "very well'
7,933
7.5 Spanish
15,300
14.5 Speak English less than "very well'
4,120
3.9 Other Indo-European languages
2,213
2.1 Speak English less than "very well'
656
0.6 Asian and Pacific Islander languages
6,899
6.5 Speak English less than "very well'
2,967
2.8 Other Languages
687
0.7 Speak English less than "very well'
190
0.2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Communi Survey 2015-2019 5- Year Estimates Map 4 - LEP shows the distribution of residents in Temecula and the region with Limited English Proficiency. Each dot represents 50 people. The different colored dots represent languages spoken by individuals who speak English "less than very well," for the 5 most common languages spoken by residents with Limited English Proficiency. Tagalog speakers appear to be concentrated in the southern and central parts of Temecula, as indicated by the green dots on the map, and therefore may be experiencing residential segregation. In the region, by comparison, Spanish speakers seem to be concentrated in certain areas.
no
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool 0 •1 2ml Legend
1`1` •
`• III .' • . • • � N
j Jurisdiction
Region
• •r • • • Limited English Proficiency
• [Jurisdiction] (Top 5 most
+ populous)
.. 1 Dot = 50 People
1r Spanish
• • Tagalog
• j Other Indo-European
Language
Other Asian & Pacific
Language
-r a;
WVietnamese
' TRACT
AFFHT0006 I County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of ... f, l D Ltecreat4 11/29/2021 RECAP Name: Map 4- LEP
Description: LEP persons (5 most commonly used languages) for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
a-saic iou
Aplon
Umnrtl Engw pmrjgwc/
tRp WlITpPsmcrt V•+pookal
1 Mi : 100 PQWe
spran
"j: ch—w
ana Aalan a a —a.
LaNge m
TRACT
Consider and describe the location of owner and renter occupied housing in determining whether such housing is located in segregated or integrated areas.
19 The analysis above shows that Temecula residents of various race/ethnicity, national origin, and LEP groups experience high levels of residential integration across the jurisdiction and there are no apparent patterns of segregation.
Discuss whether there are any demographic trends, policies, or practices that could lead to higher segregation in the jurisdiction in the future.
As shown in Table 2 — Demographic Trends, Temecula has become more diverse over the past few decades and there is reason to believe this trend will continue. Over the same period, segregation levels (as measured by the Dissimilarity Index in Table 3 — Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends) have remained low. The city continues to promote policies that encourage and support a diverse population within the city and is committed to supporting the work of the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County.
Racially and Ethnically
Poverty (R/ECAP)
Analysis
Concentrated Areas of
Identify any R/ECAPs or groupings of R/ECAP tracts within the jurisdiction.
HUD defines racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
• a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and
• a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within Temecula.
Which protected classes disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs compared to the jurisdiction and region?
HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within Temecula.
Describe how R/ECAPs have changed over time (since 1990).
HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within Temecula.
Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Analysis
20 Educational Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to proficient schools based on race/ethnicity, national origin, and family status.
Table 12 - Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a School Proficiency Index, which measures the proximity various racial/ethnic groups have, based on where they live, to neighborhoods with high -performing schools. School proficiency is measured using school -level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams. The index is based on a range of 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better proximity to high -performing schools.
In Temecula, the school proficiency index is similar for all racial/ethnic groups, indicating that all groups have similar proximity to proficient schools. This is true for the total population and those living below the poverty line, with the exception of Native Americans below the poverty line, who have a significantly higher index value than other groups (76.30), indicating they are more likely to live in neighborhoods with high performing schools than other groups.
In the region, there are wide disparities in the school proficiency index across racial/ethnic groups and for the population below the poverty line. Black and Hispanic residents below the poverty line have the lowest index values (25.68 and 26.74, respectively), meaning they are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high -performing schools. White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents above the poverty line have the highest index values (46.63 and 51.51, respectively) meaning they are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high -performing schools.
Table 12 - Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity
School
Low
Low Poverty
Proficiency
Labor Market
Transit
Transportation
Jobs
Environmental
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
Index
Index
Index
Index
Cost Index
Proximity Index
Health Index
Total Population
White, Non -Hispanic
77.09 68.11
51.86 43.35
34.97 47.19
42.26 Black, Non -Hispanic
73.35 68.27
49.24 43.18
37.57 50.70
42.02 Hispanic
71.54 66.04
49.09 46.06
38.56 54.21
41.00 Asian or Pacific Islander, Non -Hispanic
74.66 69.97
49.79 42.76
36.53 46.91
42.94 Native American, Non -Hispanic
76.34 69.63
50.94 43.92
33.70 42.56
44.83 Population below federal poverty line
White, Non -Hispanic
71.44 66.63
49.45 47.49
39.32 53.81
41.48 Black, Non -Hispanic
66.61 65.92
48.93 44.32
44.20 54.80
40.01 Hispanic
68.62 67.03
50.04 49.97
41.96 53.88
40.50 Asian or Pacific Islander, Nan -Hispanic
57.08 64.40
43.25 55.32
46.87 66.14
39.17 Native American, Non -Hispanic
77.90 76.30
49.22 35.88
30.42 27.59
47.35 Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region)
Total Population
White, Non -Hispanic
50.83 46.43
33.94 48.57
42.13 45.92
48.02 Black, Non -Hispanic
41.38 35.44
26.46 53.65
45.13 45.67
38.89 Hispanic
36.39 33.26
24.37 55.76
46.31 46.90
37.84 Asian or Pacific Islander, Non -Hispanic
58.83 51.51
42.31 55.92
42.65 53.56
35.12 Native American, Non -Hispanic
39.48 35.90
24.58 47.70
43.26 43.36
49.90 Population below federal poverty line
White, Non -Hispanic
37.75 37.30
25.07 48.70
45.70 43.28
51.53 Black, Non -Hispanic
26.43 25.68
16.85 53.16
48.28 41.83
42.21 Hispanic
24.29 26.74
16.85 57.51
49.70 45.50
39.29 Asian or Pacific Islander, Non -Hispanic
41.94 35.76
29.56 58.72
49.53 57.38
34.87 Native American, Non -Hispanic
29.25 30.43
19.72 50.03
46.34 44.62
44.78 Noe1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; Af S; Great Schools; Common Core of Data; SABINS; LAI; LEHD, NATA - all accessed through
the HUD AFFH Tool, Table 12, Version AFFHT0006, Released Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details / www.hudexchanQe.info/resourcel4848/affh-data-documentation) . 21 Describe the relationship between the residency patterns of racial/ethnic, national origin, and family status groups and their proximity to proficient schools.
Map 7 — Demographics and School Proficiency is a series of three maps showing the School Proficiency Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type.
The maps are shaded according to school proximity index values. The darker shaded areas are those with higher index values, indicating the presence of higher performing schools in those areas.
There are clear differences in school performance based on geography, with areas along the eastern/southeastern edge of the city having higher performing schools than the central and northern areas. The maps show that Temecula residents of different racial/ethnic groups and different countries of origin, represented by different colored dots, have similar access to areas with high performing schools: there are no concentrations of differently colored dots in the areas with low performing schools (lighter shading) or high performing schools (darker shading).
Similarly, while there are families with children living in areas with lower school proficiency index values, there are also families with children living in areas with high performing schools. The size of the circles on the map indicates the percentage of households in the area that are families with children. There are similarly sized circles in areas with low and high school proficiency index values.
22 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 7 - Demographics and School Proficiency
Description: School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status, and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
X
White, Non -Hispanic
Black, Non -Hispanic
{ Native American, Non -
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non -Hispanic
Multi -racial, Non -Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
School Proficiency Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
23 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 7 - Demographics and School Proficiency
Description: School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status, and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
dd+ Mexico
Philippines
X
�; Other South Eastern Asia
}T Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ ECAP
School Proficiency Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
24 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 7 - Demographics and School Proficiency
Description: School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status, and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
of Households that are
Families with Children
0% -20%
20.1% -40%
40.1 % - 60%
60.1 % - 80
80.1% -100%
TRACT
R/ ECAP
School Proficiency Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Describe how school -related policies, such as school enrollment policies, affect a student's ability to attend a proficient school. Which protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools? The City of Temecula does not have jurisdiction over the public schools, which are governed by independent public -school districts, such as the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Temecula Valley Unified School District has a policy that allows parents to transfer their children among schools, subject to availability. In these cases, parents are responsible for providing transportation to the new school.
Employment Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected class groups.
25 Table 12 — Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Jobs Proximity Index, which measures the physical distance between where Temecula residents of different races/ethnicities live and the location of jobs. A higher index value indicates better access to employment opportunities. In Temecula, there is some disparity in access to employment centers by race/ethnicity: Hispanic residents are most likely to live near employment centers (with an index value of 54.21) and Native Americans are least likely to live near employment centers (with an index value of 42.56). Overall, Native American residents living below the poverty line are the least likely to live near employment centers (with an index value of 27.59) while Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line are the most likely to live near employment centers (with an index value of 66.14).
Except for Native American residents living below the poverty line and individuals of Asian/Pacific Islander descent, residents in Temecula generally have better access to employment centers than residents in the region as a whole. In the region, Black residents living below the poverty line have the least access to employment centers (with an index value of 41.83) and Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the greatest access (with an index value of 57.38).
Table 12 — Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Labor Market Index, which measures the unemployment rate, labor -force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor's degree, by neighborhood. A higher index value indicates that residents live in a neighborhood with higher labor force participation and human capital. In Temecula, the table shows that most groups have similar access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. Apart from Asian/Pacific Islander residents, who have the lowest index value (43.25), the different racial/ethnic groups, including those living below the poverty line, all have values that range between 48.93 and 51.86.
Compared to the region, Temecula's residents generally have better access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. Asian/Pacific Islander residents in the region have an index value similar to the value for Asian/Pacific Islanders in Temecula (42.31 in the region, compared to 43.25 in Temecula). In the region, all other racial/ethnic groups, including populations living below the poverty line, have much lower index values than in Temecula.
Furthermore, the populations living below the poverty line in the region have lower index values than the overall regional population. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index value (16.85), indicating they have the least access of any group to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
How does a person's place of residence affect their ability to obtain a job? Map 8 — Demographics and Job Proximity is a series of three maps showing the Jobs Proximity Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are closer to areas of employment. The maps clearly show the western half of the jurisdiction has better proximity to jobs centers, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities. 26 Because Temecula is well integrated, there is no difference in proximity to job opportunities by race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type.
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool •� Legend
.s x
+_. a Jurisdiction
Name: Map 8 - Demographics and Job Proximity
Description: Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
KIN White, Non -Hispanic
Black, Non -Hispanic
Native American, Non -
Hispanic
y Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
4J Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non -Hispanic
Multi -racial, Non -Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Jobs Proximity Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
27 Name: Map 8 - Demographics and Job Proximity
Description: Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
5 Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
Z India
1'
TRACT
RECAP
Jobs Proximity Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 8 - Demographics and Job Proximity
Description: Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
of Households that are
Families with Children
0% -20%
20.1% -40%
40.1% -60%
60.1% -80%
80.1% -100%
TRACT
RECAP
Jobs Proximity Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Map 9 — Demographics and Labor Market is a series of three maps showing the Labor Market Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they have higher labor force participation and human capital. The maps show the central and northern parts of the jurisdiction have higher levels of labor force participation and human capital, relative to other parts of the jurisdiction. Because Temecula is well integrated, there is no difference in access to areas with high labor market index values based on race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type. 29 Name: Map 9 - Demographics and Labor Market
Description: Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
h
Region
h
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
'" White, Non -Hispanic
Black, Non -Hispanic
Native American, Non -
Hispanic
ti,-Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
Hispanic
ti
Hispanic
SIR! Other, Non -Hispanic
Multi -racial, Non -Hispanic
'7.
TRACT
RIECAP
Labor Market Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
30 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 9 - Demographics and Labor Market
Description: Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
h
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
b India
TRACT
RECAP
Labor Market Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
31 Name: Map 9 - Demographics and Labor Market
Description: Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
L,
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0%-20%
20.1%-40%
40.1 % - 60%
60.1 % - 80%
80.1 % - 100%
TRACT
RIECAP
Labor Market Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Which racial/ethnic, national origin, or family status groups are least successful in accessing employment?
The table below titled, Labor Force Participation and Unemployment, shows 2013-2017 American Community Survey data on labor force participation rates and unemployment rates for the overall population and by race/ethnicity, disability status, and sex, in both Temecula and the region. The graph below title, COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Unemployment Rate, shows the monthly unemployment rate for Temecula and the region in 2020 and 2021, demonstrating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employment.
According to the table, in Temecula, Hispanic residents have the highest labor force participation rate (70.8%) and Black residents have the lowest (64.4%). There are much wider disparities in the unemployment rate. Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents have the lowest unemployment rates (5.43% and 6.2%, respectively). Black and Hispanic residents have significantly higher unemployment rates (10.8% and 11%, respectively). Native Americans have the highest unemployment rate in Temecula: 22.1 %. In the region, by comparison, unemployment rates are generally higher than in Temecula, with the exception of rates for Hispanic and Native American 32 residents, which are slightly lower. The pattern of disparities in the region is similar to the city, with Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents having the lowest unemployment rates, followed by Black and Hispanic residents, and Native Americans having the highest rates of unemployment.
In both Temecula and the region, residents with a disability are far more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole. In Temecula, the unemployment rate for residents with a disability is 13.7% (compared to 7.6% for the overall population). In the region, it is even higher: the unemployment rate for residents with a disability is 17.1 % (compared to 9.9% for the overall population).
Finally, in both Temecula and the region, women are more likely to be unemployed than men. In Temecula, the unemployment rate for women is 7.4% compared to 6.2% for men. In the region, the unemployment rate for women is 9.5% compared to 8.8% for men.
Table - Labor Force Participation and Unemployment
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
I Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region)
Labor Force
Labor Force
Unemployment Rate
Unemployment Rate
Participation Rate
Participation Rate
Population 16 years and over
1 66.20%
7.60%1
60.30%
9.90%
Race/Ethnicity
White, Non -Hispanic
65.30%
6.20%
55.50%
8.30%
Black
64.40%
10.80%
58.50%
14.10%
Hispanic
70.80%
11.00%
64.40%
10.60%
Asian or Pacific Islander
64.67%
5.43%
60.70%
7.40%
Native American
65.50%
22.10%
56.30%
17.80%
Disability Status
With any disability
49.60%
13.70%1
38.50%
17.10%
Sex (population 20 to 64 years)
Male
87.60%
6.20%
80.20%
8.80%
Female
69.50%
7.40%
65.80%
9.50%
Note 1: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates As shown in the graph below, during the economic shutdown necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment in both Temecula and the region increased dramatically. While the unemployment rate in Temecula reached higher levels in March -May 2020 than the unemployment rate in the region (peaking at approximately 17% in Temecula compared to 15% in the region), since June 2020, employment in Temecula has recovered at a faster rate than in the region, leading to lower unemployment levels in Temecula during the second half of 2020 and throughout 2021. 33 Graph - COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Unemployment Rate
18.0 16.0
14.0 v
12.0 z
10.0 a)
E
0 8.0
a
E
c 6.0
E, go]
2.0 0.0
T"T 6T T& T((31 T6L
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction) Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region) It is very likely the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated racial/ethnic and gender -based unemployment disparities in both Temecula and the region. While data at a local level is not yet available, national trends show wide disparities in job losses by race/ethnicity and sex. According to the Congressional Research Service,2 across the U.S., women at every age group experienced higher increases in unemployment during the pandemic than men. The same was true for Black and Hispanic workers in comparison to White and Asian workers. The tables below show the disparities in peak unemployment rates during the pandemic by age/sex, race, and ethnicity. z Falk, G., Romero, P., Nicchitta, L, & Nyhof, E. (2021, August 20). Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved December 4, 2021, from https:Hcrsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R46554 34 Figure 7. Unemployment Rates by Racial Group
Seasonally adjusted monthly data, January 2020 to Ju ly 2021 Black Asian White
20%
m
*Peak: 16.7%
is ■ Peak 14.9% • Peak: 14.1 %
ir 15%
C
d
E
0 10%
CL
E Current: 8.2°/° r
m
5% Nurra Current: 4.8°/°.*
r Pre -recession: 6.1 °/°
*Pre -recession: 3.1% • Pre -recession: 3%
Jan '20 Jul '21 Jan '20 Jul '21 Jan '20 Jul '21
Source: Created byCRS using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Series LNS14000006, LNS 14000003,and LNS14032183 extracted using the Labor Force Statistics data series at httpsll www.bls.gov/ data/.
Notes: Black and Asian workers experienced their peak unemployment rate in May 2020. White workers peak rate occurred in April 2020.
Figure 8. Unemployment Rates by Hispanic Origin
Seasonally adjusted monthly data, January2020 to July 2021 Hispanic
Non -Hispanic
20%
Peak: 18.5%v
m
Peak: 13.6%
s=
a10%
Current'. 6.6%e
Current: 5.5°J°•
a
E
a:
5%
* Pre -recession: 5.1 %
■ Pre -recession: 3.7%
Jan -20 Jul '21
Jan '20 Jul '21
Source: Created byCRS using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Series LNU04000009 and LNU04092169 extracted using the Labor Force Statistics data series at httpsl/ www.bls.gov/data/ .
Transportation Opportunities
36 Describe any disparities in access to transportation based on place of residence, cost, or other transportation related factors.
Table 12 — Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Transit Index, which measures the likelihood that residents utilize public transportation. Higher index values indicate better access to public transit in a neighborhood. As Table 12 shows, Temecula residents of different races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 42.76 for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of 46.06 for Hispanic residents. For the population below the poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups except of Native Americans living below the poverty line, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 35.88.
In the region, all racial/ethnic groups have better access to public transit compared to Temecula.
In the region, Native Americans have the least access, with an index value of 47.70, and Asian/Pacific Islanders have the greatest access, with in index value of 55.92. Access to public transit is generally even higher for the population living below the poverty line, with Asian/Pacific Islanders living below the poverty having the highest index value (58.72).
Table 12 — Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Low Transportation Cost Index, which measures the cost of transportation in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate lower transportation costs. Transportation costs may be low in a neighborhood due to better access to public transportation, or to the density of housing, services, and employment, or to other reasons.