As Table 12 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Temecula.
Native Americans have the highest costs, with an index value of 33.70, and Hispanic residents have the lowest costs, with an index value of 38.56. For residents living below the poverty line, transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 30.42.
In the region, index values are higher for all groups, indicating lower transportation costs overall for residents in the region. There are no large disparities by race/ethnicity. The lowest index value is 42.13 (for White, Non -Hispanic residents) and the highest index value is 46.31 (for Hispanic residents). For the population below the poverty line, index values are higher for all racial/ethnic groups. Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the highest index value (49.70) and White, Non -Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index value (45.70).
Map 10 — Demographics and Transit Trips is a series of three maps showing the Transit Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with better access to public transit. The maps show that residents in neighborhoods in the central and northwestern part of the jurisdiction have better access to public transit than other areas in Temecula. As described previously, Temecula residents experience a relatively high level of residential integration across races/ethnicities, national origins, and family types. Similarly, Map 10 shows that there is no concentration of particular racial/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or family types in neighborhoods with greater or lesser access to public transit. 37 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 10 - Demographics and Transit Trips
Description: Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
�. White, Non -Hispanic
Black, Non -Hispanic
INNative American, Non -
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non -Hispanic
L Multi -racial, Non -Hispanic
TRACT
R/ ECAP
Transit Trips Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
in
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 10 - Demographics and Transit Trips
Description: Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
VMexico
lb Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
AIndia
TRACT
R/ ECAP
Transit Trips Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
39 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 10 - Demographics and Transit Trips
Description: Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
L
Region
of Households that are
Families with Children
0% -20%
20.1% -40%
40.1% -60%
60.1% -80%
80.1% -100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
Transit Trips Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Map 11 — Demographics and Low Transportation Cost is a series of three maps showing the Low Transportation Cost Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with lower transportation costs. The maps show that residents in neighborhoods in the central and northwestern part of the jurisdiction have lower transportation costs than residents in other areas in Temecula. Additionally, these maps show that there is no concentration of particular racial/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or family types in neighborhoods with higher or lower transportation costs.
M
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 11 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost Description: Low Transportation Cost Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
M, White, Non -Hispanic
! 'l Black, Non -Hispanic
Native American, Non -
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
Hispanic
y*, Hispanic
Other, Non -Hispanic
Multi -racial, Non -Hispanic
TRACT
R/ ECAP
Low Transportation Cost Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
41 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 11 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost Description: Low Transportation Cost with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
1-1
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
w
pp[j Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
jOther Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Transportation Cost Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
42 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Legend
■ �
CI t
2ml
Jurisdiction
�
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% -20%
20.1 % - 40%
40.1 % - 60%
60.1 % - 80%
80.1%-100%
TRACT
R/ ECAP
AFFHT0006 County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of..
to created: 1112912021
—A Low Transportation Cost Index
Name: Map 11 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost Description: Low Transportation Cost Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
0 - 10
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
10.1 - 20
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
20.1 - 30
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by the lack of a reliable, affordable transportation connection between their place of residence and opportunities?
In general, there are no significant differences in access to public transit or transportation cost by race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type, with the exception of Native Americans living below the poverty line, who experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation costs of any group.
Describe how the jurisdiction's and region's policies, such as public transportation routes or transportation systems designed for use personal vehicles, affect the ability of protected class groups to access transportation.
Public transportation is provided by the Riverside Transit Agency and is not under the authority of the City. However, Temecula is served by several bus lines that provide service throughout the 43 week and weekends. As it has done in the past, the City will continue to partner with developers to privately fund transportation options as development occurs. The City recently partners with RTA, the regional shopping mall, and the new community college campus to offer expanded transportation options to these workplaces, economic, and education opportunities.
Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities
Describe any disparities in exposure to poverty by protected class groups.
Table 12 — Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Low Poverty Index, which measures the level of poverty in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood. As Table 12 shows, Temecula residents of different races/ethnicities in general have similar levels of exposure to poverty. White, Non -Hispanic residents have the least exposure to poverty, with an index value of 77.09. Hispanic residents have the most exposure to poverty, with an index value of 71.54. However, there are significant disparities in exposure to poverty by race/ethnicity for the population living below the poverty line. Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index values (57.08), followed by Black and Hispanic residents (66.61 and 68.62, respectively), indicating these groups are more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than residents living above the poverty line.
Compared to the region, Temecula residents are much less likely to be exposed to poverty. In the region, Hispanic residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 36.39.
Asia/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 58.83.
The population living below the poverty line in the region is even more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods, with index values significantly lower than the overall population.
Index values for the population below the poverty line range from 24.29 for Hispanic residents to
41.94 for Asian/Pacific Islander residents.
What role does a person's place of residence play in their exposure to poverty?
Map 12 — Demographics and Poverty is a series of three maps showing the Low Poverty Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to poverty. The maps show that residents in neighborhoods in the eastern half of Temecula have less exposure to poverty than residents in other areas. As described previously, Temecula residents experience a relatively high level of residential integration across races/ethnicities, national origins, and family types. Similarly, Map 12 shows that there is no concentration of particular racial/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or family types in neighborhoods with more or less exposure to poverty.
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 12 - Demographics and Poverty
Description: Low Poverty Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
1-1
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
M White, Non -Hispanic
NBlack, Non -Hispanic
Native American, Non -
Hispanic
,v.-.Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
Hispanic
Hispanic
7 •; Other, Non -Hispanic
Multi -racial, Non -Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Poverty Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
45 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 12 - Demographics and Poverty
Description: Low Poverty Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
r
India
TRACT
RECAP
Low Poverty Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 12 - Demographics and Poverty
Description: Low Poverty Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and RECAPS Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
h
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0%-20%
20.1%-40%
40.1%-60%
60.1%-80%
80.1 % - 100%
TRACT
RECAP
Low Poverty Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by these poverty indicators?
According to the above analysis, Asian/Pacific Islanders living below the poverty line have the highest exposure to poverty in Temecula, followed by Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line.
The table below, titled "Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin", shows data from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey on poverty rates by race/ethnicity and national origin.
According to the table, Temecula has a relatively low poverty rate (6.81 %) compared to the region (16.82%), and this is true across race/ethnic and national origin groups (with the exception of Native Americans). Within Temecula, however, there are disparities in who experiences poverty by race/ethnicity and national origin. Native American residents have the highest poverty rate (30.36%), followed by Black residents (12.34%), Asian/Pacific Islander residents (8.04%), Hispanic residents (7.44%), and White, Non -Hispanic residents, who have the lowest poverty rate (5.75%). Foreign -born residents of Temecula are also slightly more likely to live below the poverty line, with a poverty rate of 7.7% compared to 6.64% for native-born residents. 47 In the region, similar disparities occur, with Native American, Black, and Hispanic residents more likely to live below the poverty line than White, Non -Hispanic residents. Asian/Pacific Islander residents in the region, while having a higher poverty rate than their counterparts in Temecula, have a relatively low poverty rate compared to other groups in the region. As in Temecula, foreign - born residents are more likely to live below the poverty line than native-born residents.
Table - Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
I Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region)
Total
Population Living Below Population Living Below
Total
Population Living Below Population Living Below
Population
Poverty Rate (#) Poverty Rate (%)
Population
Poverty Rate (#)
Poverty Rate (%)
Total Population
1 110,280
7,508 6.81%1
4,382,493
737,025
16.82%
Race/Ethnicity
White, Non -Hispanic
59,147
3,402 5.75%
1,465,613
159,930
10.91%
Black
5,557
686 12.34%
313,338
73,271
23.38%
Hispanic
30,421
2,264 7.44%
2,198,958
452,129
20.56%
Asian or Pacific Islander
10,642
856 8.04%
301,846
35,449
11.74%
Native American
685
208 30.36%
35,878
8,519
23.74%
National Origin
Foreign Born
17,110
1,318 7.70%
943,917
174,128
18.45%
Native
93,170
6,190 6.64%
3,438,576
562,897
16.37%
Note 1: Data Sources: U.S. Census
Bureau, 2013-2017American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Describe how the jurisdiction's and region's policies affect the ability of protected class groups to access low poverty areas.
The City has adopted land use policies concentrating multi -family housing projects along major arterials, shopping, employment centers, and recreational facilities. This allows lower income persons easier access to opportunities; but at the same time, concentration of multi -family housing may statistically increase residents' exposure to poverty.
Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by protected class groups.
Table 12 — Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes an Environmental Health Index, which captures the potential exposure to harmful toxins in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to harmful toxins, and therefore better environmental quality, in a neighborhood. As Table 12 shows, Temecula residents of different races/ethnicities in general have similar levels of access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Index values in Table 12 range from 41.00 for Hispanic residents to 44.83 for Native American residents. Populations living below the poverty line have similar levels of access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Index values for those below the poverty line range from 39.17 for Asian/Pacific Islander residents to 47.35 for Native American Residents.
In the region, there are more disparities in access to environmentally health neighborhood across races/ethnicities. The lowest index value in the region is 35.12 for Asian/Pacific Islanders and the highest is 49.90 for Native Americans. For regional residents living below the poverty line, there are similar disparities: Asian/Pacific Islanders have the lowest index value (34.87) and White, Non -Hispanic residents have the highest index value —of any group in the region (51.53) Map 13 — Demographics and Environmental Health is a series of three maps showing the Environmental Health Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to harmful toxins and therefore higher environmental quality.
The maps show that most Temecula neighborhoods have a similar, relatively low (compared to the national average) level of environmental quality. Some neighborhoods along the eastern edge of the city have slightly higher index values, meaning that residents in those neighborhoods have access to a somewhat healthier environment than residents in other areas. As described previously, Temecula is well integrated and Map 13 shows that there is no concentration of racial/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or family types in neighborhoods with better or worse environmental quality.
Name: Map 13 - Demographics and Environmental Health
Description: Environmental Health Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
h
Region
h
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non -Hispanic
Black, Non -Hispanic
Native American, Non -
Hispanic
SAsian/Pacific Islander, Non-
. Hispanic
'7 . Hispanic
rOA
*Other, Non -Hispanic
s,
93' Multi -racial, Non -Hispanic
TRACT
R/ ECAP
Environmental Health Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Name: Map 13 - Demographics and Environmental Health
Description: Environmental Health Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
;: IT Mexico
rre•
:N Philippines
:1t.3
f Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
iA India
TRACT
RIECAP
Environmental Health Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
50 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool I
i
i AFFHT0006 I County of Riverside, San IS, Bureau of ... D to crest Name: Map 13 - Demographics and Environmental Health
Description: Environmental Health Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
h
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0%-20%
20.1%-40%
40.1%-60%
60.1%-80%
80.1 % - 100%
TRACT
RECAP
Environmental Health Index
0-10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods?
The Environmental Health Index in Table 12 and Map 13 — Demographics and Environmental Health show that there is no significant disparity in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by race/ethnicity, national origin, or family status.
Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Identify and discuss any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national origin or familial status. Identify areas that experience an aggregate of poor access to opportunity and high exposure to adverse factors. Include how these patterns compare to patterns of segregation and R/ECAPs. 51 The analysis did not identify any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and/or exposure to adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type. In general, based on the data analyzed in the tables and maps, these protected class groups appear to have similar levels of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors.
Regarding areas that experience an aggregate of poor access to opportunity and high exposure to adverse community factors, Census tract 432.16 has a Low Poverty Index value of 37 and a Labor Market Index value of 37, indicating that residents in this area have high exposure to poverty and low levels of labor market participation and human capital.
Disproportionate Housing Needs
Analysis
Which groups (by race/ethnicity and family status) experience higher rates of housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing when compared to other groups? Which groups also experience higher rates of severe housing burdens when compared to other groups?
For the 2022 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), the City of Temecula analyzed 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data to determine if particular race/ethnic groups at various income levels disproportionately experience any of the following four housing problems:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the analysis in the ConPlan, at least one racial/ethnic group is disproportionately impacted by one or more of four housing problems in all income levels. Disproportionate impact means that a particular group is more likely to experience housing problems when compared to the population as a whole. As the table below shows, among Temecula households that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Black, Native American, and Hispanic households are more likely than other households to experience at least one of the four housing problems listed above. Ninety-three percent (93%) of Black households, 89% of Native American households, and 84% of Hispanic households experience at least one housing problem. In comparison, 78% of White households and 62% of Asian households experience at least one housing problem. 52 Disproportionate need across household earning 0-100%AMI 100% 93% 89%
90%
50%
40%
20%
0%
White Black/African Asian American Pacific Hispanic
American Indian, Alaska Islander
N ative
Percentage -jurisdiction as a whole (79%)
Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013-2017 5- Year Estimates
The 2022 ConPlan also analyzes the disproportionate impact of severe housing problems by race/ethnicity. Similar to housing problems, severe housing problems are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator. • Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern toilets.
• Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
• Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
As with the above analysis, the table below shows that, among Temecula households that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Black, Native American, and Hispanic households are also more likely than other households to experience at least one of the four severe housing problems listed above. Seventy-nine percent (79%) of Native American households, 72% of Black households, and 61 % of Hispanic households experience at least one housing problem. In comparison, 48% of White households and 41 % of Asian households experience at least one housing problem.
53 Disproportionate need across household earning 0-100%AMI 100%
79%
8D96
72%
51%
50%
49%
40%
20%
%
White Black/
Asian American Pacific Hispanic
African
Indian, Islander
American
Alaska Native
� Percentage Jurisdiction asa whale (53%)
Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American CommunitySurvey 2013-2017 5- Year Estimates
Which areas in the jurisdiction and region experience the greatest housing burdens? Which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated areas, or P/ECAPs and what are the predominant race/ethnicity or national origin groups in such areas?
Map 6 — Housing Problems is a series of maps showing concentrations of households experiencing one or more housing burdens and population distribution by race/ethnicity and national origin, for both Temecula and the region. On these maps, areas with darker shading have a higher percentage of households experiencing at least one housing burden. Housing burdens in this context are: cost burden, defined as paying more than 30% of income for monthly housing costs including utilities; overcrowding; lacking a complete kitchen; and lacking plumbing. The maps show that northwestern neighborhoods in Temecula have a high concentration of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens, compared to other neighborhoods. These maps also show there is no apparent concentration of specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with high or low concentrations of housing burdens —as we have seen in other maps above, residents of different races/ethnicities and national origins are fairly well integrated across Temecula.
In the region, there are high concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens to the east and to the north/northwest of Temecula. It appears that these areas with high concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens in the region (as shown by darker shading) are also areas with concentrations of Hispanic residents, as well as residents born in Mexico.
54 HUD Affi
Data and Mapping Tool
Name: Map 6 - Housing Problems
Description: Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs and race/ethnicity dot density
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Name: Map 6 - Housing Problems
Description: Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs and national origin dot density
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non -Hispanic
;>. Black, Non -Hispanic
1zNative American, Non -
Hispanic
F Asian/Pacific Islander, Non -
Hispanic
'fi.j Hispanic
i Other, Non -Hispanic
Multi racial Non Hispanic
TRACT
R/ ECAP
Percent Households with Burden
< 33.19 %
33.19 % - 42.02 %
42.02 % - 50.97 %
50.97%-61.9%
61.9 % - 100.0 %
Legend
Jurisdiction
h
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
1W a Mexico
r
Philippines
fir* Other South Eastern Asia
1 p Other Central America
9- India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Percent Households with Burden
< 33.19 %
33.19 % - 42.02 %
42.02 % - 50.97 %
50.97%-61.9%
61.9 % - 100.0 %
55 HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
TRACT
R/ECAP
Percent Households with Burden
< 33.19 %
33.19 % - 42.02 %
42.02 % - 50.97 %
50.97 % - 61.9 %
61.9 % - 100.0 %
Percent Households with Burden:
Data not Available
Name: Map 6 - Housing Problems
Description: Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs and race/ethnicity dot density
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA
HUD -Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
N.. Wr ® rac
lr4dslke
n.umn
1 cW s 7 pp C`ppl�
"1 wt—Nb FYI_
644�. Iki-Hap�nc
ILtrre Mwr� nog+.
P
�!? JWorrPadfe Imndw', Nory
�i FNPv.c
HL$Pk
�; qmr, Fla4tn�ryrSc
rwi�114?M-IJpMwwr.c
PW—d H...h. { WM eud-
35.7B %
1h am n.sn.ar%
%
f
56 M1Up 4lrowa• 4a.5'ryr . -
R.Plen
WJl.gii Bl W91p P449[ rl] RCP*
+rrOdl pCllulpiyj
1 Dal a M POO@
hloncn
PI"4PC•es
�� Dlla'rpHrm .m.ncs
r:.
Ulhp' $ailh kaniwn Asla
TRACr
WECAP
Mrre.l MPudmld. wWtl lubn
a 33. 11) %
5 98.1996, d].CQ .1
5U.07 %
hk 6I.9%-190.9%
Describe the differences in rates of renter and owner occupied housing by race/ethnicity in the jurisdiction and region.
The table below, titled "Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity", shows the percentages of households that are renters and homeowners by race/ethnicity, for Temecula and the region. In Temecula, 64% of all households own their home, however there are significant disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for White, Non -Hispanic residents in Temecula is highest, at 68%. Asian/Pacific Islander households have a comparable homeownership rate of 65%. However, only 55% of Hispanic and Black households own their home. For Native Americans, the homeownership rate is even lower, at 42%, however the population numbers for Native Americans are quite small and therefore estimates are less accurate.
In the region, the overall homeownership rate (62%) is slightly lower compared to Temecula, but similar disparities by race/ethnicity are present. Homeownership rates for White, Non -Hispanic residents and Asian/Pacific Islander residents are even higher in the region (at 70%) than compared to Temecula, while homeownership rates for Black residents are even lower (at 42%). The homeownership rate for Native Americans is higher in the region than in Temecula (52% versus 42%), but still lower than most other groups. For Hispanic residents, homeownership rates in the region and City are almost identical (56% and 55% respectively). 57 Table - Homeownershio and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA (Region)
Total Households
Homeowners
Renters
Total Households
Homeowners
Renters
Race/Ethnicity
#
# %
#
%
#
# %
#
%
All Households
33,644
21,600
64%
12,044
36%
1,335,366
832,117
62%
503,249
38%
White, Non -Hispanic
20,873
14,154
68%
6,719
32%
595,385
422,456
71%
172,929
29%
Black
1,901
1,052
55%
849
45%
104,691
43,898
42%
60,793
58%
Hispanic
7,222
3,944
55%
3,278
45%
522,460
291,047
56%
231,413
44%
Asian or Pacific Islander
2,998
1,944
65%
1054
35%
87,005
60,820
70%
26,185
30%
Native American
1 328
139
42%
189
58%
11,033
5,702
52%
5,331
48%
Note 1: Data presented are numbers of households, not individuals.
Note 2: Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Alk
The Heart of Southern Callfornia
Wine Country
Draft Citizen Participation Plan
As required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations found at 24 CFR 91.105, this Citizen Participation Plan sets forth the City of Temecula policies and procedures for providing citizens and other interested parties with opportunities to participate in an advisory role in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). The City receives CDBG funds annually from HUD, and this program is administered through the Community Development Department.
As a recipient of CDBG funds, the City is required to produce the following documents:
1. Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments — a five-year planning document that examines housing and demographic data to identify fair housing issues, determine contributing factors and establish goals to take meaningful actions to address and overcome any fair housing issues identified. The Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments examines data to identify any patterns of integration and segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity and disproportionate housing needs.
2. Consolidated Plan — a five-year plan that documents the City of Paramount's housing and community development needs, outlines strategies to address those needs and identifies proposed program accomplishments. The Consolidated Plan includes the City's policies related to displacement of low- and moderate -income individuals, reducing poverty, removal of lead -based paint hazards, preventing and mitigating homelessness and affirmatively furthering fair housing choice.
3. Annual Action Plan — an annual plan that describes specific CDBG projects that will be undertaken over the course of the fiscal year to meet the strategic plan goals of the Consolidated Plan and to affirmatively further fair housing choice.
4. Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) — an annual report that evaluates the City's accomplishments and use of CDBG funds.
The primary objectives of the Citizen Participation Plan are to:
1. Encourage citizen participation by all Temecula residents in the development of the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, and CAPERs, emphasizing the involvement of low- and moderate -income residents, people living in locally -designated blight areas or primarily low- and moderate - income neighborhoods, people living in neighborhoods where CDBG funds are proposed to be used, people with disabilities, minorities, non-English speakers, and residents of assisted housing.
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 1 February 21, 2022
2. Encourage participation by all stakeholders in the development of the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments and Consolidated Plan, including but not limited to:
public and private agencies that provide assisted housing, health services, and social services (including those focusing on services to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, homeless persons), community - based and regionally -based organizations that represent protected class members, organizations that enforce fair housing laws, the local homeless Continuum of Care, other public and private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low-income individuals and families; homeless individuals and families, including homeless veterans; youth; and/or other persons with special needs, publicly funded institutions and systems of care that may discharge persons into homelessness (such as health-care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions), state or local health and child welfare agencies, Public Housing Agencies, resident councils, business and civic leaders and adjacent Cities and regional government agencies, including local planning and transportation agencies, particularly for strategies that go beyond a single jurisdiction.
3. Give all citizens reasonable and timely access to meetings, information and records relating to the City's CDBG program.
4. Give all citizens the opportunity to identify and respond to proposed uses of funds.
5. Give all citizens the opportunity to review and comment on program performance.
This Citizen Participation Plan, together with other program documents may be provided in alternative formats for persons with disabilities upon request.
For information on the CDBG program, citizen participation opportunities, the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, the Consolidated Plan, Action Plans or CAPERs, please contact the CDBG Consultant in the Community Development Department. Brandon Rabdiou, Senior Management Analyst — Brandon. [email protected] Public Hearings/ Community Meetings
1. At least two public hearings/ meetings will be held each year to obtain citizen's views about housing and community development needs, proposed uses of funds, strategies and actions for affirmatively furthering fair housing and review of program performance. These meetings will take place at different stages of the year (e.g., in conjunction with the Action Plan in the spring and the CAPER in the fall). At least one meeting will be held during the development of, and prior to publishing the Assessment of Fair Housing or Consolidated Plan for comment.
2. The City will ensure adequate public notice before each public hearing, with sufficient information published about the subject of the hearing to facilitate informed comment.
Public hearings/ meetings will be announced in the newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 2 February 21, 2022
3. The City will hold all public hearings and public meetings at times and locations accessible to potential and actual beneficiaries. Reasonable accommodations will be made for people with disabilities upon advance request.
4. The City will provide interpretation services for non-English speaking residents at public hearings upon advance request, provided such services are available.
Development of the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans
1. The City will make a concerted effort to notify citizens and stakeholders of the development of the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans through mailings (including electronic mailings), online postings and public notices in the newspaper.
2. The City will conduct workshops at various and convenient times to inform and educate citizens and interested stakeholders on the development of the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans. The City will solicit input from residents and stakeholders through these workshops, interviews and/or surveys.
3. The City will make any HUD -provided data and any other supplemental information for the Assessment of Fair Housing and Consolidated Plan available via the City website.
4. Upon request, the City will provide technical assistance to groups representing low- and moderate -income persons to develop proposals for eligible activities in situations when CDBG funds are made available to the public through a Notice of Funding Availability or Request for Proposals process.
5. The City will publish its proposed Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans for review and comment. The City will publish public notices describing the purpose of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans and listing the locations where full copies of the draft plans may be examined.
6. Before the City adopts the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plans, the City will make available to citizens and other interested parties information that includes the amount of funds the City expects to receive, the range of activities that may be undertaken, the amount of funds that will benefit low- and moderate -income residents, and any planned activities likely to result in displacement.
7. The City will receive and consider written comments on the proposed Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans for a minimum period of 30 days and will hold public hearings/ meetings prior to adopting the final Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans.
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 3 February 21, 2022
Amendments to the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans
1. The City will amend its approved Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments when it is determined by HUD or the City that there is a material change that requires the revision. A material change is a change in circumstances in the City that affects the information on which the Assessment of Fair Housing is based to the extent that the analysis, the fair housing contributing factors, or the priorities and goals of the Assessment of Fair Housing no longer reflect actual circumstances.
2. The City will amend its approved Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan whenever it makes one of the following decisions:
a. To carry out a project not previously described in the Annual Action Plan using funds covered by the Consolidated Plan, including program income. b. To substantially amend the purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of a project. c. To substantially amend the allocation priorities or the method of distributing funds.
3. A substantial amendment is defined as the following:
a. An amendment of the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments that is considered a material change;
b. An addition, modification, or elimination of a Consolidated Plan goal; c. An addition of a new project not previously identified in the Annual Action Plan. d. A change in a project after the adoption of the Annual Action Plan that meets one of the following thresholds:
i. a net increase or decrease greater than 50% of the original allocation of CDBG funds to the project if the original allocation was $50,000 or more; ii. a net increase or decrease greater than 100% of the original allocation of CDBG funds to the project if the original allocation was less than $50,000; or
iii. a net increase or decrease greater than $400,000.
4. Substantial amendments to the approved Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan must be authorized by the City Council and will be made public by publishing notices in the newspaper. Minor changes and/or corrections may be made to the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans, so long as the changes do not constitute a substantial amendment. Minor changes, including but not limited to City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 4 February 21, 2022
modifications of Consolidated Plan or Action Plan goal outcome indicators, are not considered a substantial amendment and will not require public review or a public hearing.
5. The City will receive and consider written comments on substantial amendments to this Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan for a minimum period of 30 days and will hold a public hearing to receive comments on substantial amendments prior to implementing those amendments.
Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPERs)
1. The City will prepare a CAPER each year to notify citizens of the accomplishments of the previous program year and the progress of the Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing.
2. Citizens will be afforded notice of the CAPER through online postings and public notices in the newspaper.
3. The City will receive and consider comments on the CAPER for 15 days before the public hearing to authorize submission of the report to HUD.
Access to Information and Records
1. Any citizen or stakeholder may submit written requests for information regarding the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan and CAPER, including the City's use of funds under the CDBG program and the benefit to low- and moderate -income residents during the preceding five years.
2. This Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan, the current Annual Action Plan, the current CAPER, and any substantial amendments to these plans will be available for public review in the Community Development Department and on the City website. A reasonable number of free copies of these documents are available upon request.
3. The local Public Housing Agency will be provided access to the Assessment of Fair Housing strategies and Consolidated Plan projects that may impact their activities.
4. Upon request, the City will make reasonable efforts to provide documents and records in a format accessible to persons with disabilities.
Limited English Proficiency
In accordance with the City's Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP), the City will translate and publish notices and other vital documents (e.g., marketing, brochures, program applications) as determined by the Language Access Plan.
Comments, Complaints and Appeals
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 5 February 21, 2022
The City will consider any comments of citizens received in writing or orally at public hearings in preparing this Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, CAPERs, and/or substantial amendments to the aforementioned documents. A summary of all comments will be attached to the Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, CAPERs, and substantial amendments to these documents. Complaints may be made via telephone by calling (951) 694-6400 or in writing to:
Community Development Department/CDBG, City of Temecula, 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590. The complaining party should state the nature of the complaint, what prior efforts have been made to resolve the problem and any other pertinent information which would help staff determine a solution.
1. The City will respond to written complaints received by the Community Development Department/CDBG, City of Temecula relating to the Assessment of Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, CAPERs, and/or substantial amendments to these documents. Written complaints must describe the objection, provide supporting information and provide contact information of the complainant. Where practicable, the City will respond to complaints within 15 working days of receiving the written complaint, acknowledging the letter and identifying a plan of action, if necessary.
2. Appeals to complaint responses should be made to the following persons in order:
Director of Community Development
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
City Manager
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
City Council
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Director of Community Planning and Development
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite #4054
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Special Exceptions and Waivers
In accordance with the waivers authorized by the CARES Act, the City may elect to conduct expedited public comment periods (5 days) for activities associated with the CDBG-CV program.
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 6 February 21, 2022
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN,
2022-2023 ACTION PLAN,
2022 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING, AND
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
Program Pursuant to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations, the City of Temecula has prepared a 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022-2023 Action Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan.
The 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan is a planning document that identifies the City's affordable housing and community development short and long-term needs, priorities, and goals. It also outlines the strategies and timelines for achieving the City's goals as required to receive an estimated $2.8 million of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds combined over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026, to cover grant years 2022-2026.
The 2022-2023 Action Plan is the City's application to HUD for CDBG funds delineating the projects to be undertaken during the program year. The Action Plan identifies the federal and other resources expected to be used to address the priority needs and goals noted in the Consolidated Plan.
The 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing is to assist the City in identifying fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals to affirmatively further fair housing.
The Citizen Participation Plan ensures the City conducts adequate and effective outreach as part of its HUD grant planning and implementation process. 30 Day Comment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a copy of these draft documents will be available Period: to the public for review and comment from:
DATE: Monday, March 28, 2022 through Tuesday, April 26, 2022 LOCATION: City of Temecula
Community Development Department,
41000 Main Street,
Temecula, California 92590
WEBSITE httD://temeculaca.aov/CDBG
Public Hearing: NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Temecula City Council will conduct a public hearing to. The purpose of the public hearing is as follows:
a. To receive public comments, suggestions, or other information for consideration prior to approving the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022- 2023 Action Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan.
b. To approve the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022-2023 Action Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan.
Interested citizens are invited to submit written comments and/or attend the public hearing to offer comments, suggestions, or other information for consideration by the Temecula City Council. Written comments must be submitted at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst, City of Temecula Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590.
DATE: Tuesday, April 26, 2022
TIME: 6:00 PM
LOCATION: Council Chamber
City Hall
41000 Main Street,
Temecula, California 92590
ADA It is the intention of the City to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Brandon Rabidou at (951) 506-5142 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.
LEP Compliance: Si necesita mas informacien sobre este aviso o la traducci6n de documentos en espanol, comuniquese con Brandon Rabidou al (951) 506-5142 (TTY: 951 308- 6344 ).
Kung kailangan mo ng higit pang impormasyon tungkol sa abisong ito o sa salin ng mga dokumento sa Tagalog, tawagan si Brandon Rabidou sa 951-506-5142 (TTY: 951-308-6344)
City Contact: For more information, contact Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst, by email at [email protected]
Published: March 28, 2022
Item No. 17
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 26, 2022
SUBJECT: Introduce Ordinance Amending Section 10.28.010(D) of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Office Specialist II
Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: The Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits on the following streets:
Declared
Name of Street and Portion Affected
Prima Facie
S eed Limit
Avenida Buena Suerte
Del Rey Road to Avenida Centenario
25 MPH
Avenida Centenario
Avenida Buena Suerte to Via Norte
25 MPH
Business Park Drive
Rancho California Road to Diaz Road
35 MPH
Channel Street
Butterfield Stage Road to Chaote Street
25 MPH
Country Glen Way
Via Rio Temecula to Temecula Parkway
35 MPH
Date Street
Ynez Road to Lakeview Road
50 MPH
Date Street
Lakeview Road to East City Limits
45 MPH
Declared
Name of Street and Portion Affected
Prima Facie
S eed Limit
Del Rey Road
Via Norte to Calle Pina Colada (S)
30 MPH
Harveston Drive
Harveston Way to Harveston School Road
30 MPH
La Paz Street
25 MPH
Temecula Parkway to Ynez Road
Loma Linda Road
Pechan a Parkway to Via Del Coronado
35 MPH
Murrieta Hot Springs Road
Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road
50 MPH
Nicolas Road
Winchester Road to Calle Girasol
45 MPH
North General Kearny Road
Margarita Road to Calle Pina Colada
40 MPH
Old Town Front Street
Temecula Parkway to Santiago Road
40 MPH
Overland Drive
Enterprise Circle to Jefferson Avenue
30 MPH
Overland Drive
40 MPH
Jefferson Avenue to Margarita Road
Rainbow Canyon Road
35 MPH
South City Limits to Pechan a Parkway
Redhawk Parkway
40 MPH
Vail Ranch Parkway to Wolf Valley Road
Redhawk Parkway
Wolf Valley Road to Nighthawk Pass
40 MPH
Township Road
Village Road to Harveston Drive
25 MPH
Temecula Lane
Loma Linda Drive to Canterfield Drive
25 MPH
Vail Ranch Parkway
Nighthawk Pass to Redhawk Parkway
40 MPH
Via Norte
30 MPH
Solana Way to Avenida Del Reposo
Butterfield Stage Road
Rancho California Road to Murrieta Hot Springs
50 MPH
De Portola Road
Jedediah Smith Road to East Terminus
45 MPH
Pauba Road
Ynez Road to La Primavera Street
40 MPH
Pauba Road
La Primavera Street to Butterfield Stage Road
45 MPH
Pauba Road 40 MPH
Butterfield Stage Road to Via Del Monte
BACKGROUND: The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires local authorities to review, reaffirm or adjust speed limits within their jurisdiction every seven (7) years based on an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey. The CVC also mandates that new speed limits be established based on an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The E&T survey provides the mechanism for the legal enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or any other electronic speed - measuring device.
As defined in the California Vehicle Code, an engineering and traffic survey is "a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities." The survey shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements, accident statistics, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. These characteristics are all considered when determining a reasonable and prudent posted speed limit.
It should be noted that establishing a speed limit, which is not consistent with the 85th percentile speed, constitutes a "speed trap" and is not enforceable by the use of radar or any other electronic speed -measuring device.
Willdan Engineering conducted an E&T Survey on twenty-four (24) roadways, which included fifty-four (54) segments. The survey indicates that many existing speed limits do not require a change, and the recommended speed limits are consistent with the existing posted speed limits.
There are, however, twenty-three (23) segments where a decrease to the posted speed limit is being recommended. The segments are as follows:
Segment
MPH Decrease
Avenida Buena Suerte
Del Rey Road to Avenida Centenario
30 MPH to 25 MPH
Avenida Centenario
Avenida Buena Suerte to Via Norte
30 MPH to 25 MPH
Channel Street
Butterfield Stage Road to Chaote Street
35 MPH to 25 MPH
Harveston Drive
Harveston Way to Fairmont Lane
35 MPH to 30 MPH
Harveston Drive
Fairmont Lane to Lakeview Road
35 MPH to 30 MPH
La Paz Street
Temecula Parkway to Ynez Road
35 MPH to 25 MPH
Overland Drive
Enterprise Circle to Jefferson Avenue
35 MPH to 30 MPH
Rainbow Canyon Road
South City Limits to Temecula Creek Inn
40 MPH to 35 MPH
Rainbow Canyon Road
Temecula Creek Inn to Pechanga Parkway
40 MPH to 35 MPH
Redhawk Parkway
Vail Ranch Parkway to Wolf Valley Road
45 MPH to 40 MPH
Redhawk Parkway
Wolf Valley Road to Peppercorn Drive
45 MPH to 40 MPH
Redhawk Parkway
Peppercorn Drive to El Chimisal/Tehacha i Pass
45 MPH to 40 MPH
Segment
MPH Decrease
Redhawk Parkway
45 MPH to 40 MPH
El Chimisal/Tehacha i Pass to Nighthawk Pass
Vail Ranch Parkway
45 MPH to 40 MPH
Nighthawk Pass to Harmon Lane/Terzich Drive
Vail Ranch Parkway
45 MPH to 40 MPH
Harmon Lane/Terzich Drive to Redhawk Parkway
Via Norte
35 MPH to 30 MPH
Calle Pina Colada to Avenida Centenario
Via Norte
35 MPH to 30 MPH
Avenida Centenario to Avenida Del Re oso
Butterfield Stage Road
55 MPH to 50 MPH
Rancho California Road to La Serena Way
Butterfield Stage Road
55 MPH to 50 MPH
La Serena Way to Calle Chapos
Butterfield Stage Road
55 MPH to 50 MPH
Calle Chapos to Nicolas Road/Sommers Bend
Butterfield Stage Road
55 MPH to 50 MPH
Nicolas Road/Sommers Bend to Murrieta Hot Springs Road
Pauba Road
MPH to 45 MPH
Via Rami to Meadows Parkway50
Pauba Road
50 MPH to 45 MPH
Meadows Parkway to Butterfield Stage Road
Additionally, establishment of a posted speed limit is recommended at the following locations:
Location
MPH Recommended
Murrieta Hot Springs Road
50 MPH
Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road
Temecula Lane
25 MPH
Loma Linda Drive to Canterfield Drive
De Portola Road
Margarita Road to Meadows Parkway
45 MPH
The recommended posted speed limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the Caltrans MUTCD for establishing prudent posted speed limits that are consistent with roadway conditions, prevailing speeds, and more importantly, enforceable.
At the meeting of December 7, 2021, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered the proposed speed limit changes and reaffirmations and approved (3-0) the staff recommendation that the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in the table attached to the Engineering and Traffic Survey entitled Summary of Recommendations.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Public Works Signs Account No. 001.164.601.5244 and Public Works Striping and Stenciling Account No. 001.164.602.5410.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance
2. Summary of Recommendations
ORDINANCE NO.2022-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 10.28.010(D) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the described prima facie speed limits on the following streets:
Declared
Prim Facie
Name of Street and Portion Affected Speed Limit
Miles Per Hour
Avenida Buena Suerte
Del Rey Road to Avenida Centenario 25
Avenida Centenario
Avenida Buena Suerte to Via Norte 25
Channel Street
Butterfield Stage Road to Chaote Street 25
Harveston Drive
Harveston Way to Fairmont Lane 30
Harveston Drive
Fairmont Lane to Lakeview Road 30
La Paz Street
Temecula Parkway to Ynez Road 25
Murrieta Hot Springs Road
Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road 50
Overland Drive
Enterprise Circle to Jefferson Avenue 30
Rainbow Canyon Road
South City Limits to Temecula Creek Inn 35
Rainbow Canyon Road
Temecula Creek Inn to Pechanga Parkway 35
Redhawk Parkway
Vail Ranch Parkway to Wolf Valley Road 40
Redhawk Parkway
Wolf Valley Road to Peppercorn Drive 40
Redhawk Parkway
Peppercorn Drive to El Chimisal/Tehachapi Pass 40
Redhawk Parkway
El Chimisal/Tehachapi Pass to Nighthawk Pass 40
Temecula Lane
Loma Linda Drive to Canterfield Drive
25 Vail Ranch Parkway
Nighthawk Pass to Harmony Lane/Terzich Drive 40
Vail Ranch Parkway
Harmony Lane/Terzich Drive to Redhawk Parkway 40
Murrieta Hot Springs Road
Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road
50 Section 2. Severability. The Temecula City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of April, 2022.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Matt Rahn, Mayor
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of April, 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Accident Posted
Rec.
Dist.
Rate*** Speed 85%
10 mi.
% in
Speed
No. Street From To (mi.)
ADT
Exp. Act. Limit Speed
Pace
Pace
Limit
Comments
1 Avenida Buena Del Rey Road Avenida
0.54 293
1.60 0.00
30 27
19-28
97 %
25 Closest to 85th Speed
Suerte Centenario
2 Avenida Avenida Buena Via Norte
0.27 256
1.60 0.00
30 31
23-32
95 %
25 Centenario Suerte
3 Business Park Rancho California Rancho Way
0.89 1,030
1.60 1.00
35 40
27-36
63 %
35 Drive Road
4 Business Park Rancho Way Diaz Road
0.36 1,487
1.60 0.00
35 37
26-35
68 %
35 Closest to 85th Speed
Drive
5 Channel Street Butterfield Stage Chaote Street
0.3 553
1.60 0.00
35 **
27 17-26
81 %
25**
Closest to 85th Speed
Road
6 Country Glen Via Rio Temecula Temecula
0.19 1,018
1.60 4.72
35 35
26-35
73 %
35 Closest to 85th Speed
Way Parkway
7 Date Street Ynez Road Lakeview Road 0.5
13,079
0.91 0.14
50 50
42-51
84 %
50 Closest to 85th Speed
8 Date Street Lakeview Road East City Limits 0.52
7,500
0.98 0.00
45 43
31-40
65 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
9 Del Rey Road Via Norte Solana Way
0.38 1,305
1.60 0.00
30 31
23-32
82 %
30 Closest to 85th Speed
10 Del Rey Road Solana Way Calle Pina
0.44 2,760
1.60 0.00
30 32
23-32
86 %
30 Closest to 85th Speed
Colada (S)
See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
9 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Accident Posted
Rec.
Dist.
Rate*** Speed 85%
10 mi.
% in
Speed
No. Street From To (mi.)
ADT
Exp. Act. Limit Speed
Pace
Pace
Limit
Comments
11 Harveston Drive Harveston Way Fairmont Ln
0.6 1,874 1.60 0.81
35 32
22-31
76 %
30 Closest to 85th Speed
12 Harveston Drive Fairmont Ln Lakeview Road
0.32 1,848
1.60 0.00 35
32 23-31
76 %
30 Closest to 85th Speed
13 Harveston Drive Lakeview Road Harveston
0.57 1,201
1.60 0.00 30 **
32 22-31
72 %
30 **
Closest to 85th Speed
School Road
14 La Paz Street Temecula Parkway Ynez Road
0.26 10,309
1.60 0.00
35 37
28-37
82 %
25 15
Loma Linda Pechanga ParkwayVia Del
0.52 3,617
1.60 0.49
35 **
39 30-39
72 %
35 **
California MUTCD Option 2
Road Coronado
16 Murrieta Hot Pourroy Road Butterfield
0.77 21,383
0.91 0.11
NP
49 37-46
66 %
50 Closest to 85th Speed
Springs Road Stage Road
17 Nicolas Road Winchester Road North General
0.59 8,681
0.93 0.18
45 43
33-42
80 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Kearny Road
18 Nicolas Road North General Joseph Road
0.64 9,028
0.93 0.16
45 49
38-47
68 %
45 California MUTCD Option 2
Kearny Road
19 Nicolas Road Joseph Road Calle Medusa
0.47 7,177
1.60 0.00
45 48
39-48
73 %
45 California MUTCD Option 2
20 Nicolas Road Calle Medusa Calle Girasol
0.14 4,097
1.60 0.00
45 48
38-47
73 %
45 California MUTCD Option 2
See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
10 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Accident Posted
Rec.
Dist.
Rate*** Speed 85%
10 mi.
% in
Speed
No.
Street From To (mi.)
ADT
Exp. Act. Limit Speed
Pace
Pace
Limit
Comments
21 North General Margarita Road Calle Pina
0.56 4,630
0.93 0.00
40 ** 43
34-43
70 %
40 **
California MUTCD Option 2
Kearny Road Colada
22 Old Town Temecula Parkway Santiago Road
0.65 11,485
1.44 0.49
40 42
32-41
66 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Front Street
23 Overland Drive Enterprise Circle Jefferson
0.22 5,736
1.60 0.72
35 31
23-32
87 %
30 Closest to 85th Speed
Avenue
24 Overland Drive Jefferson Avenue Ynez Road
0.33 19,821
0.93 0.14
40 45
37-46
74 %
40 25
Overland Drive Ynez Road Margarita Road
0.29 16,382
0.91 0.58
40 38
29-38
67 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
26 Rainbow South City Limits Temecula
1.09 15,029
1.60 0.11
40 37
29-38
84 %
35 Closest to 85th Speed
Canyon Road Creek Inn
27 Rainbow Temecula Creek Pechanga
0.5 10,880
1.60 0.00
40 42
33-42
73 %
35 Canyon Road Inn Parkway
28 Redhawk Vail Ranch Wolf Valley
0.37 27,546
0.91 0.45
45 41
33-42
82 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Parkway Parkway Road
29 Redhawk Wolf Valley Road Peppercorn
0.5 14,401
0.91 0.00
45 39
30-39
75 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Parkway Drive
30 Redhawk Peppercorn Drive El Chimisal /
0.92 9,379
1.60 0.21
45 40
31-40
75 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Parkway Tehachapi Pass
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
11 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Accident Posted
Rec.
Dist.
Rate*** Speed 85%
10 mi.
% in
Speed
No. Street From To (mi.)
ADT
Exp. Act. Limit Speed
Pace
Pace
Limit
Comments
31 Redhawk El Chimisal / Nighthawk Pass
0.2 6,205
1.60 0.00
45 40
31-40
82 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Parkway Tehachapi Pass
32 Township Road Village Road Harveston Drive
0.06 911
1.60 0.00
25 25
16-25
88 %
25 Closest to 85th Speed
33 Temecula Lane Loma Linda Drive Canterfield
0.24 571
1.60 0.00
NP
26 18-27
90 %
25 Closest to 85th Speed
Drive
34 Vail Ranch Nighthawk Pass Harmony Lane /
0.76 5,629
1.60 0.00
45 40
31-40
78 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Parkway Terzich Drive
35 Vail Ranch Harmony Lane / Redhawk
0.59 4,429
1.60 0.00
45 39
30-39
85 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Parkway Terzich Drive Parkway
36 Via Norte Solana Way Del Rey Road
0.35 849
1.60 0.00
30 31
24-33
91 %
30 Closest to 85th Speed
37 Via Norte Del Rey Road Calle Pina
0.34 2,092
1.60 1.28
30 36
29-38
72 %
30 Colada (N)
38 Via Norte Calle Pina Colada Avenida
1.06 1,720
1.60 0.00
35 37
28-37
75 %
30 Centenario
39 Via Norte Avenida Avenida Del
0.82 852
1.60 0.00
35 35
26-35
71 %
30 Centenario Reposo
40 Butterfield Rancho California La Serena Way
0.9 28,436
1.60 0.18
55 50
41-50
68 %
50 Closest to 85th Speed
Stage Road Road
See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
12 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Accident Posted
Rec.
Dist.
Rate*** Speed 85%
10 mi.
% in
Speed
No. Street From To (mi.)
ADT
Exp. Act. Limit Speed
Pace
Pace
Limit
Comments
41 Butterfield La Serena Way Calle Chapos
0.69 24,865
0.91 0.05
55 51
41-50
57 %
50 Closest to 85th Speed
Stage Road
42 Butterfield Calle Chapos Nicolas Road /
0.38 28,524
0.91 0.00
55 50
42-51
67 %
50 Closest to 85th Speed
Stage Road Sommers Bend
43 Butterfield Nicolas Road / Murrieta Hot
0.4 24,157
0.91 0.38
55 47
38-47
65 %
50 Stage Road Sommers Bend Springs Road
44 De Portola Jedediah Smith Margarita Road
1.23 20,691
1.60 0.04
45 44
34-43
69 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Road Road
45 De Portola Margarita Road Meadows
0.52 15,031
0.91 0.12
NP
46 33-42
61 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Road Parkway
46 De Portola Meadows Parkway Campanula
0.44 9,332
0.91 0.00
45 45
34-43
73 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Road Way East
47 De Portola Campanula Way Butterfield
0.47 9,220
0.91 0.21
45 46
36-45
80 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Road East Stage Road
48 De Portola Butterfield Stage East Terminus
0.6 1,626
1.60 0.00
45 46
37-46
65 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Road Road
49 Pauba Road Ynez Road La Primavera
0.38 11,316
1.44 0.00
40 46
37-46
76 %
40 Street
50 Pauba Road La Primavera Margarita Road
1 13,635
0.91 0.13
45 45
36-45
81 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Street
See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
13 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Accident Posted
Rec.
Dist.
Rate*** Speed 85%
10 mi.
% in
Speed
No. Street From To (mi.)
ADT
Exp. Act. Limit Speed
Pace
Pace
Limit
Comments
51 Pauba Road Margarita Road Via Rami
0.58 11,457
1.60 0.27
45 **
44 35-44
76 %
45 **
Closest to 85th Speed
52 Pauba Road Via Rami Meadows
0.7 9,075
1.60 0.14
50 47
38-47
68 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Parkway
53 Pauba Road Meadows Parkway Butterfield
0.39 8,732
1.60 0.00
50 44
35-44
80 %
45 Closest to 85th Speed
Stage Road
54 Pauba Road Butterfield Stage Via Del Monte
0.66 3,076
1.60 0.00
40 39
31-40
89 %
40 Closest to 85th Speed
Road
See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
14 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
Item No. 18
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report.
The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of March 2022.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Planning processed 30 new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted four (4) Public Hearings in March 2022. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report.
Plan Type AL
Month 2022
Long Range Project
4 Conditional Use Permit
1 Home Occupation
20 Massage Permits
1 Modifications
14 Temporary Use Permit
5 Wireless Antenna Faculty
2 Zoning or Planning Letter
3 Total
50 Everhome Suites (PA21-1350): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 64,500 square foot, four-story, 117 room Everhome Suites Hotel located on the west side of Madison Ave. between Buecking Dr. and McCabe Ct. (COOPER)
Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis and with an environmental consultant to prepare and environmental document. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. (COOPER)
Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER)
Solana Winchester (PA20-1371): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 350-unit apartment community located within the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan at the terminus of Date Street approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road. The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. (COOPER) Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station (PAs 21-0075, 21-0076): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Avenue. (COOPER)
Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER)
Firenze (PA21-1023): The City is processing a Development Plan application for an approximately 498,557 square foot hotel and apartment project. The approximately 148,545 square foot, five story, 224 room hotel includes a conference center, restaurant, wine market multi -tenant space, and outdoor courtyard dining space. The approximately 350,012 square foot, seven story, 121-unit apartment building include a roof top area that contains a pool/spa, cabanas, fire pit, media wall, kitchen, fitness area, and lawn/game area. The parking for the project is located on the interior of the apartment building that is wrapped with the residential units. The project is located approximately 665 feet north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. (COOPER)
Prado (PAs 21-0838, 21-0839): The City is processing Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map applications for a 237-unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres consisting of detached rental condominiums. The project includes a clubhouse, pool, bocce ball court, cornhole court, tot lot walking paths, and fitness center. The project is located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road. The projects are scheduled for Planning Commission on April 20, 2022. (COOPER) MS Mountain View Ph. IV (PAs 21-1470, 21-1471, 21-1472): The City is processing three (3) Development Plan applications for industrial buildings of 9,867 square feet, 19,727 square feet, and 38,714 square feet located along Avenida Alvarado. The projects are scheduled for Planning Commission on May 4, 2022. (COOPER)
Jefferson/Buecking Apartments (PA21-1454): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a 260-unit apartment community located on the north and south side of Buecking Drive at the Jefferson Avenue intersection. (COOPER)
Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Update (PA21-1525): The City is processing a Modification to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan. The updated Master Plan, at buildout will include the existing 237,305 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with
an approximately 130,000 square foot, four story Behavioral Health Building in Phase 2, an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot medical office buildings, and a 14,000 square foot utility plant in Phase 3, and an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square three story foot medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated to the roof of the structure in Phase 4. The project is located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. A public scoping meeting for the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report was held on March 23, 2022, at the Ronald H. Roberts Library. (COOPER)
Temecula Resort and Spa (PAs 22-0035, 22-0037): The City is processing a Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map for an approximately 474,137 square foot, seven (7) story, 90-foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between 1 st Street and 2nd Street. (COOPER) Temecula Hyundai (PA22-0293): The City is processing a Modification to a Development Plan for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road. (COOPER)
LONG RANGE PLANNING
General Plan Update
The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four -phase, multi -year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements. Phase I also included an update to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for CEQA. Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City's GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City's Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City's remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The final phase is to work with a General Plan Advisory Committee to update to the General Plan and EIR over an 18-month timeframe. (PETERS) Quality of Life Master Plan Update
On April 27, 2021, the City Council established a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP). The QLMP identifies the City's six core values, including: 1) Healthy and Livable City; 2) Economic Prosperity; 3) Safe and Prepared Community; 4) Sustainable City; 5) Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; and 6) Accountable and Responsive City Government. Projects and programs proposed in the City's Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Program must be consistent with the City's Core Values. Performance measures (indicators) are measured annually to track progress and the completion of goals and objectives. (PETERS)
Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: Staff brought this item before City Council on June 8, 2021, for further discussion. The City Council directed staff to extend the temporary program for one year
and develop a permanent outdoor dining program. A subcommittee meeting is anticipated in the next few weeks. (PETERS, WATSON)
Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of ADUs, offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained at the Community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. On March 18, 2021, staff kicked off the project with the Consultant and staff from Planning, Building, Public Works, and Fire. This will be a joined effort between the internal departments and the consultant. Staff is working with the consultant on the first task (Phase 1: Schematic Design), staff has provided feedback of the Schematic Design taking into consideration the School District and Development Impact Fee (DIF) fees, and appropriate unit type and size. On, October 19, 2021, staff presented at the draft site plan and architecture designs to the Southern Riverside County Association of Realtors (SRCAR). On November 30, 2021, staff held an Open House to solicit feedback from the professional community (i.e., Engineers, Contractors, Architects, etc.), the meeting will be open to the public. The Consultant is working on the construction drawings. (RABIDOU) Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has hired Fehr & Peers (F&P) to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for CEQA evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On July 19, 2021, Staff has a scheduled internal meeting with Fehr & Peers, they present to staff the Data Collection Status. Currently, the consultant is developing the three scenario runs to be reviewed by staff prior to conducting a full model run. (PETERS)
Mobile Food Trucks (LR20-1472): On February 23, 2021, staff presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee members (ME/JS) on Mobile Food Trucks (MFT). This was a noticed meeting with one public comment in favor of MFT, read by Stuart Fisk. The intent of the meeting was to get the subcommittee's feedback on the potential for MFT to operate in the City. Staff presented the definition of MFTs, existing regulations, standards of operation to consider, and Pros & Cons list. The subcommittee advised staff to create a framework and come back to the committee for discussion. Staff is working on developing the framework. (COLLINS)
Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Parks Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan.
The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. (PETERS) Live Entertainment: Staff is working on an updated live entertainment ordinance. This is a continuation of quality -of -life improvement ordinances. Outreach to Visit Temecula, the Old Town Temecula Association (OTTA) and the Temecula Chamber of Commerce occurred in January 2022. The Planning Commission will consider the item in February 2022. The City Council approved the Live Entertainment ordinance on March 22, 2022. (JONES)
HOUSING
Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. An amendment to the Loan Agreement was approved at the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March, 2021.
The applicant has submitted Building Permits and Grading Permits. CHW was awarded tax credits in June 2021. The project is under construction. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March 2021. (WATSON)
Housing Element Update (LR18-1620): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Council Member Edwards and Mayor Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo, will serve as advisory bodies.
Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029.
The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant to update data and write draft chapters. A Housing Workshop was held on August 17, 2021, with approximately 12 attendees. The item was recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission at the September 15, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection have signed -off on the Housing Element. The item was approved by the City Council on October 12, 2021. The City Council adopted the revised Housing Element on February 8, 2022. Staff has received a comment letter from HCD and will be making recommended changes. (RABIDOU, PETERS)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP): This program will provide rental and mortgage assistance to those eligible recipients who were negatively impacted by COVID-19. Checks are being issued for eligible recipients. Over $70,000 in funds have been distributed. The program is nearing completion as of April 2022. (RABIDOU, WATSON)
Five Year Consolidated Plan: The City is kicking -off an update to the CDBG Consolidated Plan.
Workshops were held on October 27, 2021. Citizens and other stakeholders attended the meeting and provided feedback. The survey period concluded in late January 2022. Additional information will be available at TemeculaCA.gov/CDBG. The item is scheduled for the City Council on April 26, 2022. (RABIDOU, WATSON)
BUILDING & SAFETY
Building and Safety statistics for March 2022 are highlighted in the following table.
Build ing & Safety Statistics
March 2022
Perm is
S 1F
New Single Fam iy 4J nits
S6
New Commercial Building
2 Photowoftaic
159
Tenant Improvements
9 Non CorstructionC of
S5
Number ofAct we Plan Checks
1 D54
Number ofNeuw Plan Checks
S61
Number of Finaled Permits
400
Inspections
3054
Inspections Per Day
1E�2.78
Inspections Per Person Per Day
33.19 Stops Per Month
1047
Visitors to Counter
323
New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check
• Truax Hotel (161,586 SF)
• Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 SF)
• Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 SF each) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • Hotel (38,202 SF) on Jefferson and Winchester
• Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 SF)
• New Industrial Building (32,792 SF)
• New Margarita Recreation Center (8,161 SF)
Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy
• Pacific Lending, 41689 Enterprise Cir North (4390 SF) • Maaco Auto Body & Paint, 27561 Commerce Center Dr. (10,000 SF)
Tenant Improvement
• Sketchers, 26415 Ynez Rd, (10,723 SF)
• Hendo's Brewing & Spirits, 27901 Jefferson Ave (9,228 SF)
CODE ENFORCEMENT
During the month March, Code Enforcement responded to 85 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 733 code cases, conducted 175 regular inspections and 626 weed abatement inspections, and forwarded 25 referrals.
Type of Cade Case
March
Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle
5 Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance /Infestaticon/ Mold
5 Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP
3 Trash and Debris / Dumping
Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard
677
Green Pool / Vector Control / Stagnant Water
Graffiti
17 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control
Trailer / RV Stored/Boat/Parking
13 Construction w/o Permit/Building Code
Encroach Public ROW / Trash Cans
4 Zoning/Signs
Public Safety & Health
1 Total Number of Cases
747
Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties.
Foreclosure Tr
Residential - Default 7
Residential - Foreclos
Residential - R EO 2
Total - Residential
Commercial -
Commercial - Foreclosure 5
Commercial - REO 14w,
Total - Commercial 10
ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report
PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant PA22-0256 42625 Avenida Alvarado 909-290-008 Scott Cooper 03/01/2022 03/02/2022 Mario Calvillo Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 5 MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA21-0743) to revise the pedestrian access to the right of way located at 42625 Avenida Alvarado
PA22-0257 42636 Avenida Alvarado 909-290-054 Scott Cooper 03/01/2022 03/02/2022 Mario Calvillo Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View -Bldg 10 MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA21-0745) to revise the pedestrian access to the right of way located at 42636 Avenida Alvarado
PA22-0258 42648 Avenida Alvarado 909-290-053 Scott Cooper 03/01/2022 03/02/2022 Mario Calvillo Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 11 MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA21-0746) to revise the pedestrian access to the right of way located at 42648 Avenida Alvarado
PA22-0263 32344 Penstemon Way 964-690-001 Scott Cooper 03/01/2022 03/02/2022 Dena Upp Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA31 B PPP MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to modify the previously approved Product Placement Plan to change the building plotting on lots 1 and 5 by adding a Plan 1 X option within Planning Area 31 B of Sommers Bend PA22-0267 42101 Moraga Rd 921-310-025 Jaime Cardenas 03/02/2022 Jared Hermelin Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: 42101 Moraga Verizon MOD: a Wireless Antenna Facility application to modify the existing monopine to remove three (3) antennas, add six (6) antennas, and overvoltage protection equipment at the existing wireless facility located at 42101 Moraga Road.
Company Owner Plan Type Status
MS -Mountain PL Modifications Approved
View, LLC
MS -Mountain PL Modifications Approved
View, LLC
MS -Mountain PL Modifications Approved
View, LLC
escrow acct WOODSIDE
5074 authorized HOMES OF
user SOUTHERN
CALIF
First Baptist
Church of
Temecula
PL Modifications Approved
PL Wireless Plan Review
Antenna Facility
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0271 32105 De Portola Rd 959-390-002 Jaime Cardenas 03/03/2022 03/14/2022 Jared Hermelin CITY OF PL Wireless Approved Temecula, CA 92592 TEMECULA Antenna Facility
Case Title / Description: Paloma Del Sol T-Mobile Wireless MOD: A Wireless Telecommunication Facility Modification application to remove and replace tower and ground equipment and to add nine (9) new antennas, 18 radios, three (3) T-arm mounts, new hybrid cables, new ground equipment cabinets and other miscellaneous equipment to the wireless facility located at 32105 De Portola Road.
PA22-0274 31795 Rancho California Rd 954-030-002 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2022 Crefma1 CA MV Crefma1 CA MV Crefma1 CA MV
PI -Conditional
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Fight Sports Club: a conditional use permit for to allow for a martial arts studio at 31795 Rancho California Road, Unit B-400.
PA22-0288 27403 Ynez Rd 921-260-019 Jaime Cardenas 03/07/2022 Lamei Teng MCS Tower
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Plaza, LLC
Permits
Case Title / Description: Sunshine Health: a Massage Establishment Permit (exempt) for Sunshine Health located at 27403 Ynez Road, Suite 101.
PA22-0289 42081 Dlr Dr 921-730-064 Scott Cooper 03/07/2022 03/08/2022 DANIEL FLORES Diego Dev
PL Modifications
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Lexus Carport & Solar MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) for the installation of carports with 216 solar panels as well as 152 solar panels on the roof of the Lexus dealership building located at 42081 DLR Drive.
PA22-0292 29500 Mira Loma Dr 944-060-010 Jaime Cardenas 03/08/2022 Naomi Ngoka Vintage View
PL Zoning or
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
Development
Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: Vintage View Apartments ZL: a zoning verification letter request for the Vintage View Apartments located at 29500 Mira Loma Drive (944-060-005 and 944-060-010).
PA22-0293 27430 Ynez Rd 921-290-014 Scott Cooper 03/08/2022 Armen BTAA Prop Inv II PL Modifications Out Temecula, CA 92591 Kazanchyan
Case Title / Description: Temecula Hyundai MOD: A Modification to a Development Plan for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road.
PA22-0295 42117Agena St 944-271-002 Scott Cooper 03/08/2022 03/14/2022 Francisco Guido Francisco Guido PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: Guido Addition: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to convert an outdoor patio into 150 square foot of living space for a dining room located at 42117 Agena St.
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant
Company
Owner
Plan Type Status
PA22-0296 964-640-016 Scott Cooper 03/08/2022
Dena Upp
escrow acct
Woodside
PL Temporary Out
CA
5074 authorized
Homes Of
Use Permit
user
California Inc
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend Density Core MHC: A Model Home Complex for Density Core of Sommers Bend for nine (9) model homes, a sales office, landscaping, and parking lot.
PA22-0302 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 03/09/2022
Peter Nam
Temecula Towne
PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Center Assoc
Case Title / Description: Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow for a new storefront entrance door to be installed on an existing commercial structure located at 40820 Winchester Road.
PA22-0312 32436 Toyon Rd 964-630-005 Scott Cooper 03/10/2022 03/14/2022 Dena Upp
escrow acct
WOODSIDE 05S PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
5074 authorized
user
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA17A MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) for a rear sliding door revision and a new window on the left elevation for Plan 5 located in PA17A of Sommers Bend PA22-0325 959-051-001 03/14/2022 Karen La Pointe
Karen La Pointe PL Modifications Plan Review
CA
Case Title / Description: La Pointe Building Modification (Planning Review Only): A Modification application (Planning Review Only) to allow for the installation of landscape lighting along the south elevation of an existing building. The project is located at 43980 Margarita Road.
PA22-0328 26463 Ynez Rd 910-300-014 Scott Cooper 03/17/2022 03/29/2022 Amanda Duvall KIMCO PALM PL Temporary Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
PLAZA Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Girls Day Out Market TUP: A Temporary Use Permit for the operation of a small business market on April 2, 2022, May 7, 2022, June 25, 2022, October 8, 2022, November 5, 2022, and December 3, 2022 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the parking lot at 26463 Ynez Rd.
PA22-0331 27901 Jefferson Ave 921-050-003 Jaime Cardenas 03/17/2022 03/18/2022 Maximilian Lyons Dan Henderson PL Temporary Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Hendo's Fight Night 7: a Temporary Use Permit to allow an annual fight night sporting event at Hendo's Gym on March 19, 2022 located at 27901 Jefferson Avenue.
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner
Plan Type Status
PA22-0339 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 Jaime Cardenas 03/21/2022 03/31/2022 Katya Quiroga
Temecula Towne
PL Temporary Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Center Assoc
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Circus Vargas Major Temporary Use Permit, a Major Temporary Use Permit to allow a circus event to be held at the Promenade Mall parking lot located at 40820 Winchester Road from March 29 through April 19, 2021.
PA22-0347 26463 Ynez Rd 910-300-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/24/2022 Deron Artz
KIMCO PALM
PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
PLAZA
Case Title / Description: Temeku Cinema Box Office MOD: a modification application to remove and replace the teller's box office with digital displays for the Temeku Cinema located at 26463 Ynez Road.
PA22-0348 43174 Business Park Dr 921-820-003 Jaime Cardenas 03/24/2022 Riccardo
Allison Renck
PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Ferguson
Case Title / Description: Springs Charter School Building MOD: a Modification Application for the installation of new windows to the existing industrial building located at 43174 Business Park Drive.
PA22-0351 31700 Temecula Pky 959-080-026 Scott Cooper 03/24/2022 Andrew Van Loy
TEMECULA
PL Temporary Out
Temecula, CA 92592
VALLEY
Use Permit
HOSPITAL INC
Case Title / Description: TVH GME Trailer TUP: A Temporary Use Permit for an approximately 3,600 square foot trailer use for Graduate Medical Education located on the Temecula Valley Hospital Campus.
PA22-0352 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-019 Jaime Cardenas 03/24/2022 Steve Stroder
RANCHO
PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
BAPTIST
CHURCH
Case Title / Description: Rancho Baptist Light MOD: a Modification Application to remove and replace the existing light pole heads with new 3000K LED for the existing church property located at 29775 Santiago Road.
PA22-0357 27711 Diaz Rd 921-030-002 Jaime Cardenas 03/25/2022 Shannon Almeida MK Temecula PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Investor, LLC Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: 27711 Diaz Road ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 27711 Diaz Road.
PA22-0360 27727 Jefferson Ave 921-400-029 Jaime Cardenas 03/29/2022 John Ramirez Old Jayhwawker PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Inv
Case Title / Description: 27727 Jefferson Building MOD: a Modification Application for new roofing, paint and stone veneer to the existing commercial building located at 27727 Jefferson Avenue.
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0366 909-310-002 Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2022 Jereesa PATRICIA GUZIK PL Zoning or Plan Review CA Montgomery Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: Winchester & Diaz Road ZL: a Zoning Verification Letter for four (4) parcels on Winchester Road with the Assessor's Parcel Numbers 909-310-002, -003, -004, -005.
PA22-0368 26469 Ynez Rd 910-300-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/31/2022 03/31/2022 Paloma KIMCO PALM PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92591 Perez-McEnvoy PLAZA Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: BioLife ZL: zoning verification for a proposed BioLife Plasma Services located at 26469 Ynez Road.
Item No. 19
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: John Crater, Division Chief
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Report
Wendy Miller, Management Analyst
That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly
City of Temecula Fire Department
Temecula Fire Department Service Calls
March 2022
x Incident Type
Commercial Fire 1
False Alarms 69 '
1r� —_ • � + • w ■ j �"k,,,m. sir• w.,. �
Haz Mat 2 •� s.41
Medical 627 11 o ` V • ."
19$9 Multi-Fam 0
. wF w Other Fire 6 r!Z-�, .� y * • • ' •: • .• • ■ L,rµP Other Misc 11 ,�,;, a �,;•, 8 �- .• • •" • . • • PAuBA VALLEY <<F' f f r •• i w • `. • •• • • •''
Public Assist 30 f •'� -; .'/'" • 1• w ■ , ; .- • m,�°`•°�« ,' ,eiE, . • ti • `ram
Residential Fire 2 `�� J�ir� "�= ''' �:'' ' ■■
w
Rescue 3 J 6i� n f� �� + • •■�. • ,,., •• • i , r
t. x.� w w : • �'
Ringing Alarm 0 OL "rt
��� ++ -� PECHANGA CASINO AN U'RVW
Standby 7
Traffic Collision 75 -
Wildland/Vehicle Fire 2
Total 835
City of Temecula Fire Department
Temecula Fire Department
Plan Review and Inspections
March 2022
�116 0481959/y i1
Plan Review and Inspections March Year to Date
Plan Review 467 1428
Construction Inspections 274 1376
Annual Inspections 294 1994
Counter/Public Inquiries 32 92
r "r r, ;r
` .�
1-1
Item No. 20
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police
DATE: April 26, 2022
SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (March 2022) PREPARED BY: Vic Pierson, Sergeant
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for March 2022.
PATROL SERVICES
Overall calls for police service 6,791
"Priority One" calls for service 73
Average response time for "Priority One" calls 5.99
VOLUNTEERS
Chaplain 42
Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 574
Reserve officer hours (patrol) 83
Explorer 90
Station/Administration 38
Total Volunteer hours 827
OLD TOWN STOREFRONT
Total customers served
273
Fingerprints/Live Scan
120
Police reports filed
6 Citations signed off
22 Total receipts
$5,304
CRIME PREVENTION
Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings 1
Safety presentations/Training 2
Special events 1
Residential/Business security surveys conducted 1
Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0 Station Tours 4
Planning Review Projects 4
Temp Outdoor Use Permits 2
SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM)
On sight felony arrests
1 On sight misdemeanor arrests
7 Felony arrest warrants served
8 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
65 Area Checks
94 Camp Checks
16 Pedestrian Checks
128
Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks
20 Outreach attempts / Success
1115
SPECIAL TEAMS (Metro District Team)
On sight felony arrests
5 On sight misdemeanor arrests
30 Felony arrest warrants served
9 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
27 Bar/Business checks
335
D.U.I. Arrests
12 Traffic/Parking citations
103
Firearms Seized
2 SPECIAL TEAMS (Special Enforcement Team)
On sight felony arrests
35 On sight misdemeanor arrests
7 Felony arrest warrants served
7 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
30 Follow-up investigations / search warrants
20 Parole/Probation Searches
1 Pedestrian Checks
6 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks
34 Marijuana Dispensary Checks
0 Citations issued for hazardous violations
877
Non -hazardous citations
191
Parking citations
184
Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 143
Seatbelts
18 Cell Phone Cites
144
Injury collisions
35 D.U.I. Arrests
36 Grant funded D.U.I. Traffic safety checkpoints / saturation enforcement 1 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket / traffic enforcement 1 INVESTIGATIONS
Beginning Caseload 113
Total Cases Assigned 51
Total Cases Closed 34
Search Warrants prepared/served 18
Arrests 7
Out of Custody Filings 6
Sex Offenders Processed 13
PROMENADE MALL TEAM
Calls for service
332
Felony arrest/filings
3 Misdemeanor arrest/filings
19 Traffic Citations
30 Total customers served
930
Fingerprints/Live Scans
241
Total receipts
$6,829
Felony arrest 1
Misdemeanor arrests 10
Reports 31
Citations 34
Meetings/Presentations 177
Item No. 21
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 26, 2022
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at:
hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CIRCULATION PROJECTS
Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing, PW19-15 Description: Preliminary design of the Extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a new crossing of Murrieta Creek.
Cost: $2,387,000
Status: Evaluating a change of scope for a bridge option. Currently in negotiations with the design consultant.
Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25
Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases.
Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road.
Cost: $14,255,991
Status: Phase 1 design, Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies, and Phase 1 permitting November 2019 — January 2023. Current activities include evaluation of public comments received on the draft environmental document, City review of 90% PS&E, utility purveyors review of 90% design plans, Riverside County Flood Control review of 90% design plans and Encroachment Permit application, coordination with utility companies, and preparation of applications for regulatory permitting.
French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215.
Cost: $137,356,246
Status: Currently in design. Environmental revalidation is complete. Right of way acquisition process is well underway.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02
Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp.
Cost: $8,971,710
Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — September 2022. Current activities include City revision of 95% Roadway and Structures PSE, Storm Water Data Report, Drainage Report, and Permit Engineering Evaluation Report and continued coordination with Caltrans on development of the Draft Environmental Document.
Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South.
Cost: $52,025,657
Status: Per a 3-year Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans, the City will maintain the interchange site from June 30, 2020 through June 30, 2023. The City is working with Caltrans on the relinquishment of the interchange right-of-way to the State inventory.
Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05
Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road.
Cost: $14,307,394
Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA provided comments to the JPR application on 7/30/2020. NEPA approval is anticipated in Q1 of 2022, Caltrans review time has been longer than anticipated. Biological monitoring in Temecula Creek for potential mitigation site is complete as of July 2021. CEQA is pending results of Temecula Creek monitoring and review by RCA. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. Caltrans HBP Program management has proposed reducing the curb to curb width of the bridge that is considered "participating" for grant funding purposes. Staff will address this with Caltrans HBP Program as the bridge width is the same as original approved grant application.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11
Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights, and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue.
Cost: $1,340,400
Status: Design is at 60%.
Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive.
Cost: $346,646.50
Status: Design is completed. Construction plans and specifications are being finalized. City approval of plans and authorization to solicit construction bids is scheduled for the May 10, 2022 City Council meeting.
Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access to the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane.
Cost: $1,347,674
Status: City Council awarded the construction contract at the meeting on May 25, 2021. Construction started June 21, 2021. Construction completion is anticipated in May of 2022.
V
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Bike and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting
Description: Project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road.
Cost: $400,000
Status: Project is currently in design.
Citywide Drainage Master Plan
Description: Project will prepare a report that shows all drainage courses within the City. Also includes a master hydrology study showing the anticipated storm flows at build -out.
Cost: $600,000
Status: In scope discussion with the chosen consultant. City award scheduled for the May 24, 2022 City Council meeting.
Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07
Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment.
Cost: $5,000,000
Status: Phase 1 design. Reviewed 100% plans.
4 City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe.
This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, and irrigation between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange.
Cost: $3,533,483
Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — August 2022. Environmental revalidation completed October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, design of new power and irrigation water service, and Design Engineering Evaluation Report.
Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21
Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool Cost: $10,656,507.91
Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020 to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. The Design - Build Contract was awarded at the March 9, 2021 City Council Meeting to De La Secura Builders, Inc., for a Guaranteed Maximum Price of $8,680,459.00. Design phase is well underway. The second building plan review was completed on January 25, 2022 and the Design Builder is working to address comments.
The existing MRC building was vacated by City Staff and all salvageable equipment removed on January 28, 2022. The Fire Department used the existing building for training the week of February 7, 2022. The demolition of the existing MRC building started on February 14, 2022. Major demolition activities should commence mid -March. City Groundbreaking occurred on March 31, 2022. The majority of building and foundation has been demolished as of April 5, 2022.It is anticipated building construction will be complete in February of 2023 with a grand opening in Spring 2023.
Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 Description: The project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Work includes new exterior siding, painting, replacement of perimeter soffits, fascia boards, eaves, and select doors & windows.
Cost: $1,000,000
Status: In design. Reviewed 90% plans.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail.
Cost: $6,288,595
Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. The Notice to Proceed for construction was issued to the contractor with a work start date of April 19, 2021. Groundbreaking event occurred on May 4, 2021. Jefferson undercrossing section is complete. Asphalt paving between Jefferson and Winchester near Diaz is complete. Ynez undercrossing section is complete. Tieback wall section under I- 15 section is complete. Contractor is currently working to lower wall section of 1-15. Completion is anticipated in May/June of 2022.
Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location.
Cost: $2,716,764
Status: The project is in design. 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PSE) expected in July 2022.
Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road.
Cost: $198,920
Status: Project is currently in design.
N.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Sidewalks — DLR Drive, PW19-18
Description: New sidewalks on the north and west side of DLR Drive.
Cost: $442,077
Status: Currently solicitating construction bids with bid opening for late May 2022.
Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road.
Cost: $467,403
Status: Project is currently in design.
Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02
Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side Fifth Street, between Front Street and Murrieta Creek.
Improvements include grind/overlay of entire street, tree grates, bollards, streetlights.
Cost: $159,267.30
Status: Construction is complete.
7 City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site.
Cost: $1,280,284
Status: The environmental document, CEQA IS/MND, was approved at the July 27, 2021 Council Meeting. Project was advertised for bids between September 9, 2021 and October 7, 2021. Bids were opened on 10/07/2021. Construction contract was awarded at the 10/26/2021 City Council meeting. Wall construction is complete and backfilled. Construction completed on March 20, 2022. Temporary fencing in place to protect newly planted grass. Temporary fencing will be removed mid -April.
Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Vail Ranch Park and Long Canyon Creek Park.
Cost: $1,127,800
Status: Project is currently in design.
Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing
Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks.
Cost: $800,000
Status: An RFP is being prepared for the design, purchase & installation for three playground project sites — Redhawk Community Park, Long Canyon Creek Park & Temecula Creek Park.
Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of a new restroom building, including additional stalls and urinals, a large snack bar and a dedicated storage case.
Cost: $1,120,000
Status: Project was advertised and construction bids were opened on March 3, 2022. The construction contract was awarded at the April 12, 2022, City Council meeting. Construction will begin in May 2022. 8 City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS
American Tire Depot
Description: A 7,303 square foot building to be used for tire retail and repair, as well as minor auto repair services, located at the southwest corner of Ynez Road and DLR Drive.
Status: Parking lot has been paved. Wet utility tie-in construction has commenced.
Arrive @ Rancho Highlands
Description: A 270-unit multi -family community built on 12.32 acres that includes 55 affordable units. The project is located adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond approximately 775 feet southeast of Rancho California Road on the north side of Ynez Road.
Status: Grading and onsite storm drain permits were issued in October 2021. Grading and onsite storm drain construction has commenced. Overflow parking lot has been paved.
Better Buzz
Description: Demolition of 445 square feet of an existing commercial building (former Corner Bakery), the addition of a drive-thru, the addition of tower with trellis, and changes to the elevations of the existing building located at 32435 Temecula Parkway
Status: Precise grading permit has been issued. Grading and construction has commenced and is ongoing.
Chick-fil-a
Description: Existing fast-food restaurant to reconfigure the existing drive-thru, relocate an existing trash enclosure and add square footage and landscaping.
Status: Precise grading permit was issued January 13, 2022. Grading and construction has commenced and is ongoing.
E
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued)
Heirloom Farms
Description: A Development Plan for a 321-unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road.
Includes the installation of a new Traffic Signal at the intersection of Ynez Rod and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive
Status: Rough grading permit has been issued in July 2021, the offsite and private onsite street and storm drain improvements permits were issued in October 2021 and the traffic signal permit was issued in September 2021. Grading, street, and storm drain improvements and the traffic signal installation has commenced.
Precise Grading plans are currently being reviewed.
Las Haciendas Apartments
Description: A Development Plan to construct a 77-unit affordable housing project located at 28715 Las Haciendas Street in Uptown Temecula
Status: Precise grading permit was issued in December 2021. Grading has commenced in January 2022 and is ongoing.
Longhorn Steakhouse
Description: 5,708 square foot restaurant with outdoor patio located at 29363 Rancho California Road Status: Precise grading permit is approved. Construction expected to begin soon.
Mountain View
Description: Thirteen industrial buildings on Avenida Alvarado Status: Eight precise grading permits have been issued and construction has commenced. Improvements on Avenida Alvarado, along with street light installations is in process. Onsite storm drain installation has commenced.
10 City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
March 22, 2022
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued)
Solana Assisted Living
Description: A 90,000 square foot, two-story, Senior Assisted Living Facility located on the southeast corner of the Margarita Road and Solana Way.
Status: A rough grading permit was issued in January 2022. Grading began on February 7, 2022. Street improvements and precise grading plans have been submitted for review.
Sommers Bend
Description: Land Development has provided oversight of the following submittals for plan check and inspections: final maps, Community Sports Park and recreation lots, precise grading; street and storm drain improvements; traffic signals; street lighting; and signing & striping.
Status: The mass grading permit was issued in September 2018. Sommers Bend has been paved with streetlights installed. The community sports park, Ranch at Sommers Bend, construction is complete and has been accepted at the February 8, 2022 Council Meeting with its Ribbon Cutting ceremony scheduled for February 12, 2022. The Sommers Bend recreation center construction is complete. Bond release for Long Valley Wash in process. Installation of streets, storm drains and streetlights on east end of project is in process.
Grading has been completed in the Density Core, currently installing sewer. Installation of Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements northwest end of project is in process. 11 REQUESTS TO SPEAK
AND ELECTRONIC
COMMENTS SUBMITTED
FOR THE RECORD
Public Comment
Agenda Item No.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Non -Agenda Item: U, Agenda Item:
For ❑ Against ❑
a
Date: 4 Z /ZZ
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record., /1 , n „ — _ _ .
Name
Addres
Email a
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item:
Agenda Item No. For ❑
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Agenda Item
Against El
0 Date: / G
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: T�L19C�zPhone Number:
Address: / Kam/ `ttx_
Email address:
If you are representing an organization or gr2.ue, please give the name:. / y✓I C c S tv d iro 1 Lc
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
Public Comment
Agenda Item No.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Non -Agenda Item: F—] Agenda Item: ❑
For El Against ❑
Date: N'�' , 1 9, G , a `� 6
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: 1J C)\ ,sue Phone Number �
Address\'\ �
If you are representing an organizatigg or group, please give the name:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
Public Comment
Agenda Item No.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Non -Agenda Item: '1!9� Agenda Item:
For El Against El
a
Date:
\X
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: IL CUL4,4"1 "I
Address
Email address:
(
Phone Number:
'). - L CA4 ci ?_ .fir
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
�C /►" t C� I6i Sfc/ � n-. CGv h
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
_ y CITY OF TEMECULA
ivsv
Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: rV Agenda Item: ❑
Agenda Item No. For Against 1-1
Date: r �o
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: �o,ri n Phone Number:
Address: ! / / C__rl_l
Email address: ' i'
ou are representing an organization or group, please give the name:_p, ta,
Public Comment:
Agenda Item No.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item:
For El Against ❑
Date:
b
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: Phone Number:
Address:
Email address
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
IQ89
Date:
Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑
Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: \ � V V! ��til �' l l'� Phone Number: `
Address
Email adc
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: -Tm-c 6 r 1 j W 1 ) Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
Public Comment
Agenda Item No.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Non -Agenda Item: E Agenda Item: ❑
For ❑ Against ❑
Date: 2�
111
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record...
Name:
Address:
Email address:
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
Phone Number:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
noN`V,
Public Comment
Agenda Item No.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Non -Agenda Item: � Agenda Item: ❑
For El Against ❑
Date: Ia&12,z
,1
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
11,
you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
REQUEST TO SPEAK t�
CITY OF TEMECULA
14l;y
Date: 2 ZO Z Z
Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑
Agenda Item No. For Against ❑
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: v`D %rSSGN�� Phone Number:
Address: / '
Email address:
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:! ' I k- Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
Public Comment
Agenda Item No.
REQUEST TO SPEAK 1
t
CITY OF TEMECULA
Non -Agenda Item: 91 Agenda Item: 1-1
For Against 1-1
Date: e2 26 O
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ��
Name: �.. l Phone Number:
Address
Email address:
If you are,5epresenting an organization Qr group, please give the name:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item:
Agenda Item No. For El
REQUEST TO SPEAK \�
CITY OF TEMECULA
Agenda Item
Against El
El
Date: Z4,)UCa
,b:��
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ^ �
���
Address:
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
-
vsv
103,49
03 CITY OF TEMECULA
Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 1�f
Date: �a\' _-a
Agenda Item No. 1 �J For Against
Request to Speak forms for Publi&,bomments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
Name: cam` � Phone Number:
Address
Email address
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.
All information provided is optional.
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 10:43 AM
To:
ctmassa'
Subject:
RE: Public Comment for Tonight's Council Meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi,johl cDtemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: ctmassa
Subject: Public Comment for Tonight's Council Meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Randi-hope this message finds you well. Please accept this letter for non-agendized public comment for tonight's council meeting. I know it may not fit in the 30 minutes.
Thank you!
I would like to commend the City of Temecula for supporting diversity in its businesses and support of the arts, in particular the beautiful and entertaining performing art of drag. The Temecula Drag Experience is and always should be supported in our city, and it's contribution to the arts should not be understated. I would love to see it come to The Merc! Related to this, I would like to call for censure of Councilmember Alexander, for using the identity of her position as a city council member to try and undermine this business. As a so-called Christian, she is alllowed to hold whatever beliefs she likes, personally. I say "so-called," because the Christianity I practice preaches love and tolerance, so I'm not entirely sure what she is practicing. However, we
have separation of church and state, and she is not allowed to use her office and station as a council member to object to a city business on religious grounds. She is not entitled to use her city office to rally religious organizations to protest a business that the city supports. This objection on these grounds has no place in city government. It is wholly inappropriate and an abuse of her office. As Mayor Rahn said, there is no issue with this business operation, so Councilmember Alexander once again demonstrates that she doesn't know what her job is.
And to underscore Councilmember Schwank's comments, once again, Councilmember Alexander is drawing attention to our city for hate and zealotry, which I add is also a dereliction of her duties. How much more of this do the citizens of Temecula have to take from her? I am ashamed that any of my tax dollars go to her city paycheck.
Councilmember Alexander, I pray that you can learn to open your heart to true tolerance and acceptance, and that you take an interest in actually doing your job. Until then, you do not represent me, nor the City of Temecula.
Thanks,
Christine T. Massa
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 10:43 AM
To:
'Gia Rueda'
Subject:
RE: Letter to City Council in support of the Drag Brunch Experience Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Gia Rueda
Subject: Letter to City Council in support of the Drag Brunch Experience CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
April 26, 2022
Dear Temecula City Council,
Jessica Alexander is a constant source of shame to Temecula, using her religion as a weapon to sow discord and promote intolerance.
A recent Facebook post featuring the Press Enterprise article on the Temecula Drag Bruch Experience, had OVERWHELMING supportive comments for the show, while simultaneously expressing disappointment in Alexander's negativity. At the time I'm writing this letter, 333 people "liked" or "loved" the article featuring Chad Riley and Anthony Aglio's Drag show; while only 4 people responded with "angry" emojis. (Do the math, Jessica!)
This is simple. It's acceptable for Alexander to personally be guided by the practices of her religion; but her religion cannot be forced upon others. It's called SEPARATION OF CHUCH AND STATE! Alexander is
continually harming Temecula's reputation. I thought comparing herself to Rosa Parks was beyond the pale, but her verbal attack on Chad Riley and Anthony Aglio was unwarranted, malicious, and discriminatory.
Therefore, I request the following:
1. Censure the discriminatory actions/comments of Jessica Alexander.
2. Ensure Jessica Alexander does not continue to use her title, city time, or city resources to discriminate against LGBTQ businesses.
3. Attempt to prevent future liability for the City, by making Jessica Alexander stop her inflammatory assertions against LGBTQ businesses, suggesting they will `lower property values and lead to an increase in crime, vandalism and litter,' and suggesting they are `lewd' and `dangerous.' I'm happy to see diversity in Temecula, and I hope we can all welcome new businesses to our fine city, without discriminating against them by applying religious labels or laws on them.
With Respect,
Gia Rueda
15-year-resident of Temecula
Retired Police Sergeant
Desert Storm Veteran
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 10:42 AM
To: 'Lori Goudeau'
Subject: RE: a THANK YOU & a WELCOME
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(&temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Lori Goudeau
Subject: a THANK YOU & a WELCOME
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I would like to thank Matt Rahn & Zak Schwank for having the commitment & respect for our Temecula community- to speak truth & defend morality regarding the challenges faced in dealing with Jessica Alexander's usage of city email to discriminate against an LGBTQ business & defame the character of the business owners.
I would also love to welcome business owners- Chad Riley & Anthony Agllo, & express my family's appreciation for their part in the advancement & growth of an inclusive, safe, respecting family community.
With much excitement for continued community progress,
Lori Goudeau
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:38 AM
To: 'Andrea Dunham'
Subject: RE: Public comment for meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.joh165)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St. Temecula. CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Andrea Dunham
Subject: Public comment for meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I have been a resident of Temecula for 13 years. I live here with my husband and our two children. I love so many things about Temecula but the lack of diversity is not one of them. I believe this is slowly changing and I love it! I want to raise my children in a town where all people are welcomed and loved. I want my children to see people from all walks of life and learn to love and accept them all. I personally am thrilled to see the new business Temecula Drag Brunch Experience come to our town. I would like to welcome Chad Riley and Anthony Aglio with open arms. I see you, I respect you and I support you. I believe drag shows are a unique and diverse form of entertainment. I do not believe there is anything immoral or indecent about these shows. I look forward to attending a show in the future. I have been made aware that Jessica Alexander used her city email to discriminate against this Igbt business and called the business owners evil. This type of behavior is not welcome in the town I love. Ms. Alexander is welcome to her opinions but I do not believe she should use her government position to discriminate and/or defame anyone. I would like to thank Zak Schwank for condemning Jessica Alexander's behavior. I would also like to thank Matt Rahn for speaking up and citing that the drag brunch is legally allowed to operate. I will continue to support and welcome the Igbt community in our town. I look forward to helping Temecula become a loving, diverse community.
Thank you,
Andrea Dunham
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:38 AM
To:
'Andrea'
Subject:
RE: Regarding Council Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.'ohl(@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Andrea ; Maryann Edwards
Cc: Randi Johl ; Zak Schwank ; Jessica Alexander
; Matt Rahn
Subject: Fwd: Regarding Council Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
So you all have a copy!
Hello Randi,
Please feel free to share this as I stand and Support Jessica Alexander and her efforts to keep our beautiful City of Temecula FREE from all the
trends such as this "Drag Queen" event you "SECRETLY" allowed in our city this past Sunday! Listen, we have a strong Judeo-Christian presence as parents and residents in this city and our duty is to keep this city focused on what keeps us unique and the mecca for families in this county! Allowing a business to be run and host such events, goes against 100% of our city values and it is beyond disappointing knowing this had to be hosted "secretly,"
speaks volume to the fact this would NEVER be allowed or supported by the majority of the Temecula residents. WE NEVER HAD A SAY! Now we will!
Temecula has been on a rise in the homeless population, opioid cases, theft, and other criminal activity! Remember, with growth comes growing pains! Are you ready
for what this will bring to our city?? Are you?? Have you thought about it?? Probably not, just followed the crowd right! Please know that you are ALL being watched by us residents and parents and what you think is going to be "OK'd" by us, to bring into our city, you are absolutely wrong!
Zak and Matt, the majority of us here in Harveston, rallied for you and you had our vote, you have officially lost that! Why would you ever think this would be OK? Why??
You think you won't be accepted or part of the cool kids club that has come into this city since covid, if you stood up and supported Jessica?? What's next???? A strip club??
See you all tonight at the meeting!! We DO NOT want this in our City! Jessica, we fully STAND with you!
Chad and Anthony, I don't care to even remotely look up your info to copy you on this email as you are irrelevant! What you are trying to "drag" into this beautiful city and well preserved community is not welcomed!! Forward to them if you please! Sincerely,
Andrea De Rose
Very Concerned Parent and Resident
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:36 AM
To: 'Allison Donahoe -Beggs'
Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Public Comments
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Allison Donahoe -Beggs
Subject: City Council Meeting Public Comments
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good evening City Council Members,
I am writing tonight to express my disappointment in Jessica Alexander's comments in a recent Press Enterprise article regarding a local business, Temecula's Drag Brunch Experience. Her comments were misinformed, narrow-minded, and inflammatory. As a community member, you may have your opinions, but as a government official and city representative, having your personal religious ideologies prompt your actions is inappropriate. It is shameful that we have a City Council member defaming the character of two individuals and discriminating against LGBTQ business owners in the community. These actions should have consequences and should not ever be allowed to happen again. It is so critical to understand that words and actions affect those in our community. When Councilmember Alexander makes outlandish claims that this will link to crime in the area, she is creating fear and stoking hate.
Allison Donahoe -Beggs
Temecula Resident since 1998
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:35 AM
To: 'Kim McChesney'
Subject: RE: Jessica Alexander's Drag Show
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.iohl(a)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Kim McChesney
Subject: RE: Jessica Alexander's Drag Show
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I wanted to express my disgust and disappointment with the way Jessica Alexander treated Chad Riley and Anthony Aglio and their Drag Brunch Experience. A Drag Show is an exceptionally fitting business for the Temecula landscape. The only time I have attended one is during a Bachelorette Party. Every time my husband and I visit a Temecula winery on the weekend, there is guaranteed to be a Bachelorette Party wherever we go. It seems like the perfect match for this city. The fact that Jessica Alexander called into question the morality of these small business owners for no reason is disturbing and I feel there needs to be repercussions for her actions. A Drag Show is no more "lewd" than any of the MULTIPLE comedy shows that are showcased throughout Temecula. I have never heard of her harassing these establishments. Does Jessica Alexander spend her weekends protesting the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and their casino? Jessica Alexander seems to only represent a small fraction of fanatics in Temecula. She certainly does not represent myself and my family and I hope the Temecula City Council considers how unprofessional and flat out wrong she was and makes her face the consequences for her appalling actions.
Sincerely,
2 Kim McChesney
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:35 AM
To:
'stephani baxter'
Subject:
RE: Alexander letter
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohl(c�temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: stephani baxter
Subject: Alexander letter
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Randi Johl,
Jessica Alexander is the minority voice on this board yet, represents the majority of this valley.
Alexander upholds the US Constitution, works to keep traditional American values alive in the Temecula Valley and her integrity is utmost in her leadership as councilwoman.
We're not in Vegas or LA, where trans and drag culture breed confusion, lies and sexual promiscuity.
This is Temecula, an agriculturally rich, thriving suburban and tourist destination.
My husband and I are local faith leaders and elected officials. We understand, first hand, the importance of quality leadership at the local level. We strongly support Alexanders position and actions.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Stephani & David Baxter
Stephani Baxter
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 12:10 PM
To:
'Stephanie M'
Subject:
RE: RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohl &temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Stephanie M
Subject: RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I support the right to practice religious beliefs!
-Stephanie Lantz
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 12:08 PM
To: 'Jennifer Reeves'
Subject: RE: letter to city council
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jennifer Reeves
Subject: letter to city council
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
I am writing you today out of concern over one of your council members, Jessica Alexander. Since she was voted into the council I have been concerned about her push to include her religious views into her position. Time and again she has shown that she is either unable or unwilling to separate her personal feelings and beliefs from her job on the council in which she represents a wide range of people with many differing beliefs.
Recently I read an article from the Press Enterprise, which quoted Jessicas incorrect, harmful, discriminatory, and vile comments against the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and its hosts. I have attended multiple drag shows in the past and the only thing they encourage is laughter and a fun time for attendants. Her claims of crime and lower property values are not based in fact but instead in fear. Having an opinion on the event is one thing. Using her position on the city council to try and have this event shut down as well as spread mis information about the event and its hosts is unacceptable.
I request that the city council censure Jessica Alexander over her blatant discrimination and misuse of her position and title.
Thank You
Jennifer Reeves
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 12:22 PM
To:
'Jamie Lopez'
Subject:
RE: Call to Action
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(o)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jamie Lopez
Subject: Call to Action
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello,
I would like to comment on the recent statements and actions made by council member Jessica Alexander.
Discrimination in any form is not acceptable. She openly discriminated against Mr Riley and Mr Aglio's business and even used her city email to do so. Harassment and Defamation have consequences. Are you above the law Ms Alexander? As a council member you were elected to represent the people of Temecula. Instead, you continue to only represent your own specific religious ideology. Clearly, you have demonstrated that you are incapable of respecting the boundaries of church and state over and over again. I call for you to be removed from your position as council member of Temecula or in the very least for your Censure. Your actions and words were unwarranted and discriminatory.
I would like to thank the other council members and mayor for their service. Especially to Zak Shwank who continues to speak up against the numerous comments and actions of Ms Alexander. It has not gone unnoticed, Thank you Mr Schwank.
Regards,
Jamie Lopez
Sent from Mail for Windows
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 1:42 PM
To:
'Sue Reichel'
Subject:
RE: Drag queen shows in Temecula
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Sue Reichel
Cc: Jessica Alexander <
Subject: Drag queen shows in Temecula
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We moved here almost 10 years ago, looking for a family friendly, fun, safe place to live and enjoy having our kids visit in our retirement years. I question the value of adding "entertainment" that is agenda based to our community. Make no mistake, this is more than just two businessmen who want to open a business that provides a novel show to entertain.
Little by little our Temecula as we know it will become a city unfit for conservative families to live in. For those who enjoy confusing the gender identity crisis even more in the guise of "fun", there are plenty of places that offer that:
Palm Springs, Vegas, to name a couple. Why must we flaunt that here as well? Jessica Alexander is completely within her rights to object to this type of negative influence coming into our city. We should applaud her unyielding sense of right and her unwavering commitment to preserving the Christian moral heritage of Temecula.
Sent from my iPhone
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 1:41 PM
To: 'William Joyce'
Subject: RE:
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohl(obtemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: William Joyce
Subject:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Temecula City Council,
1. Councilwoman Alexander speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. Any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning us as well.
2. We call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community.
3. 1 do not support support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community Will Joyce
Temecula Resident and Business Owner
Since 1988
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 1:43 PM
To: 'Richard Reichel'
Subject: RE: Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohlna temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Richard Reichel
Cc: Jessica Alexander
Subject: Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I am writing this email in support of Councilwoman Jessica Alexander. Jessica represents the opinions of her constituency accurately and with a forceful voice. She is a breath of fresh air in an increasingly left leaning city council and is a woman of character and conviction to her core beliefs. The last time I saw such conviction was when Councilman Nagar stood firm against the Susan G. Komen run in Temecula beause of their financial support of Planned Parenthood. This took real courage in the face of an organized and deep pocketed institution. I believe Jessica's opinion that drag events should not be supported by the City of Temecula is correct and you, the City Council, should set a tone of conservatism. Back this lady who has demonstrated real courage and honor, don't dismiss her. Jessica has our full support and is and outstanding Councilwoman.
Sincerely, Richard Reichel
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:07 PM
To: 'eric pedersen'
Subject: RE: I support Jessica Alexander.
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.moh1(@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: eric pedersen
Subject: I support Jessica Alexander.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
1. 1 do not support support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community.
2. They are purposely trying to cause division in our community . They want to destroy the family.
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:07 PM
To: 'Kimberly Auer'
Subject: RE: Councilwoman Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand [email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Kimberly Auer
Subject: Councilwoman Jessica Alexander
Importance: High
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Ms. Johl,
I wanted to take the time to write you as a resident of Temecula Valley. I am aware of the condemnation of Councilwoman Alexander. I hope, that for you as Executive Director for the City's Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission, that you also want to include the values/opinions of a vast majority of Murrieta and Temecula residents. Most of us do not support the drag/trans movement and therefore Temecula Drag Brunch Experience, and do not want it here.
I am confused, that if most of us do not want it, what minority of government officials and/or residents are asking for it? Or is anyone even requesting it? What agenda is the City of Temecula operating under? We are asking for Zak Schwank & Matt Rahn to support us and stand with Jessica, as her values and views should be included.
Many people have moved to this valley for what it used to offer for families. Many people will leave this valley eventually if it turns into a downtown, risque entertainment hub. If this is the goal of the Board, please be honest with the community, because when this stuff is brought here and you know darn well, we don't want it, as a majority of the population, it speaks loud and clear on how you feel about us as residents.
Thank you for your time,
Kimberly Auer
From:
Council Comments
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:01 PM
To:
'Rynicia Ortiz'
Subject:
RE: Public comment
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Rynicia Ortiz
Subject: Public comment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello,
My name is Rynicia Ortiz and I am a resident in south Temecula. I want to say that I strongly support Jessica Alexander and I appreciate all her hard work in the city of Temecula. She recently spoke out against a drag queen show that took place in our town. I have three small children I am raising here in Temecula, and I do not support any type of adult entertainment taking place in our family friendly town. I am also a Christian and I believe this type of show is immoral. I am grateful that Jessica took a stand against this show. Thank you Jessica and please keep up all your good work! Rynicia
Sent from my Whone
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: 'Brynley Lee'
Subject: RE: Councilmember Alexander Exposing the City to Legal Jeopardy Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl ccbtemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Brynley Lee
Cc: Leni Lee <
Subject: Councilmember Alexander Exposing the City to Legal Jeopardy CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Temecula City Council.
My wife Leni Lee and I, Brynley Lee (residents of Temecula since 1998 and 2003 respectively) are compelled to write this letter to express our outrage at Councilmember Jessica Alexander's use of her official City email to engage in discriminatory and defamatory harassment of a legitimate and legal Temecula business, the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience. We ask the Council to take any and all measures within their power to, at minimum, censure and condemn:
The Councilmember's breach of her elected duties and responsibilities to represent, promote and serve all the business and residential constituents of our City in the best interests of everyone in the City, and Her crossing of an ethical red line to use her City email as a platform to promote her personal politics of discrimination and hate against a particular business presumably based upon the protected legal status of its owners (why else did she single out this one particular business?), and Her participation in physically trying to interfere with this legal business entity's legitimate efforts to conduct their business without interference from an elected City representative acting in this manner absent any official, legal, or City statute -based reason to do so.
Contrary to the Councilmember's statements to the press, there is no evidence to support her claim that this business will increase crime or that the owners of this business are evil or that the presence of this business will drive down property values. These reckless - and false - comments are defamatory and based in discrimination - and they expose the City to liability in that she appeared to be speaking for the City in her official capacity.
As property owners in the City, we frankly are more concerned by impacts on our property values from the reputation of our City being a place of active (not passive) intolerance against certain groups of residents and businesses, exemplified by the apparently sanctioned actions and words of one of its elected "leaders." As business owners, we are also mortified by the prospect of City officials like Ms. Alexander actively engaging in public defamation and discrimination against business owners in the City under the color of her official position as a representative of the City.
Surely the Council will agree that the actions of Councilmember Alexander, while being reprehensible and morally indefensible, perhaps even more importantly in real terms put the City in some serious legal jeopardy. This cannot be sanctioned or tolerated - as in this case, failure by the Council to act could be viewed as tacit approval and complicity, further increasing the City's exposure.
We commend those Council members who have already spoken out against her actions but we ask that the remainder of the Council act as a single body to ensure that Ms. Alexander is made the subject of consequences for her actions that put the City in legal jeopardy and discredit and bring shame to the reputation of the City, its Council and all of us residents in this City.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Brynley Lee & Leni Lee
Temecula, CA 92592
z
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To:
Subject: RE: TO BE READ DURING PUBLIC COMMENT FOR MEETING 4/26/22 RE TEMECULA
DRAG QUEEN BRUNCH EXPERIENCE
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 2:24 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: TO BE READ DURING PUBLIC COMMENT FOR MEETING 4/26/22 RE TEMECULA DRAG QUEEN BRUNCH
EXPERIENCE
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good Evening Temecula City Council,
My name is Suzi Oliver and I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the Temecula Drag Queen Brunch Experience.
I would like to state that Councilwoman Jessica Alexander speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community and any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning our voices as well.
Next, I call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community.
I absolutely do NOT support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do NOT want it welcomed in our community.
This is nothing more than a further attempt to indoctrinate our children into what is harmful behavior and to normalize a most dangerous type of dysphoria.
I would like to point out, that according to the Centre For Suicide Prevention:
0.5% of the population is trans. (Which begs the question, why is our society catering to, at the expense of family values, to such a minute minority, while ignoring the overwhelming voices of the majority?)
10% of trans people report recently attempting suicide, within the past year.
Trans people are two times more likely to think about and attempt suicide than gay and lesbian people.
And perhaps the most staggering statistics:
22% - 43% of ALL trans people attempt suicide in their lifetime AND, two thirds of trans youth report self harm within the past year.
Putting a pretty name on this event, such as 'brunch' is all smoke and mirrors. Gender dysphoria is very real, and clearly harmful. Anexoria is also a type of dysphoria, where a person believes they are fat, and as a result, they can and do - starve themselves; often resulting in death. No medical practitioner, or everyday citizen, would assure that person their belief is healthy. Why, as a society, are we suddenly feeding into a person's misguided belief that they are the wrong gender and encourage them to take drastic measures (such as life altering surgeries, hormone blockers, etc) that cannot be reversed? As a parent of four children, I strongly and emphatically support Ms. Alexander's stance on this matter and I implore City Council to do the same.
Thank you
Suzi Oliver
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: 'Linda Dolleman'
Subject: RE: Stop Promoting Drag Queens in our community Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohl00meculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Linda Dolleman
Subject: Stop Promoting Drag Queens in our community
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
April 26, 2022
To: Randi Johl —Temecula City Hall at [email protected] From: Linda Dolleman Caddell & James Caddell
Re: Stop Promoting Drag Queens in our community
We fully support Councilwoman Alexander as she speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. Any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning us as well. Councilwoman Alexander shares our foundational family values. It is our responsibility to protect all our kids and their childhood.
We also call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community.
To be clear, we do not support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community.
Temecula Valley is a special place for family and friends to gather, let's keep it this way... family and kid friendly.
Thank you,
Linda Dolleman Caddell & James Caddell
Sent from Mail for Windows
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To:
'NATALIE GROHOSKY'
Subject:
RE: Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: NATALIE GROHOSKY
Subject: Re: Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Randi,
> I'm writing as a concerned member of the community. I have seen comments from the Temecula Unity Facebook group calling to reject statements and beliefs from Councilwoman Jessica Alexander. Councilwoman Alexander speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. This attempt to condemn Alexander from a so called "unity" organization is condemning us as well. This kind of rhetoric is divisive and goes against the foundations of our Constitution.
> I call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica in standing for the majority of our community. > I do not support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it celebrated or welcomed in our community. > Thank you,
> Natalie Grohosky
From: Council Comments
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:01 PM
To: 'Kacy Winger'
Subject: RE: Bigger Aquatic Facility in Temecula
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.iohlCaMemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Kacy Winger
Subject: Bigger Aquatic Facility in Temecula
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Temecula is a city that we are proud to be a part of. It has so many wonderful spaces for its residents to enjoy and a larger aquatic facility would be such a great addition to our community! As swim parents and coaches with TMEC we have witnessed first hand the need for more pool space and time. TMEC draws swimmers from all over the valley to our wonderful town, and what a gift it would be to have ample space and pool availability, and not only for competitive swimming but for other aquatic sports as well. Thank you for your time and consideration! David and Kacy Winger
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:03 PM
To:
'The Kohls'
Subject:
RE: Defending Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.jol)KNemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: The Kohls
Subject: Fwd: Defending Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: The Kohls <
Date: April 26, 2022 at 2:40:01 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Defending Jessica Alexander
To Whom it May Concern:
Jessica Alexander is a wonderful city council member that stands up for our rights and principals. As a Christian, I appreciate her standing up for my values as a leader in my community.
We should all have the freedom to agree and disagree on matters that effect our community.
Thank you Jessica for standing on your principles.
Melissa Kohl
Sent from my Whone
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To: ' R K'
Subject: RE: We support Jessica Alexander's stand
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.lohl(a-)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: R K
Subject: We support Jessica Alexander's stand
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City of Temecula,
Please know that Councilwoman Alexander is representing myself and the majority of our community and it would be wrong to silence or judge her and everyone that she represents.
Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank... join Councilwoman Alexander as the voice for the majority of the community you serve and represent!
In no way do I support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and it should never be welcomed into our community. Do not cave to the latest voices calling this good. It is horrible. Listen to the voices of the people. It has no place at all here.
Sincerely,
Rachel Kurianski
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To:
'Brandee Lilly'
Subject:
RE: Please Censure Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohl(o)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Brandee Lilly
Subject: Please Censure Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To the members of the Temecula City Council,
I am a decade -long Temecula resident and I'm really concerned about the actions our City Council person Jessica Alexander has taken against other citizens of our community. Her latest hate is being spewed toward our LQBTQ+ businesses and residents, and it seems she's using her status as a city official to shut down a legal business. WHY IS JESSICA ALEXANDER GOING AFTER LEGAL, TAXPAYING BUSINESSES? I am tired of her using city resources to push her personal agenda.
I am calling on the Temecula City Council to censure Jessica Alexander. Time and time again Jessica screws up, yet there are zero consequences. Jessica needs to STOP using the City of Temecula to spread her hate and misinformation in our city. Calling residents names, harassing their businesses, and making our city look bad is not okay. Our citizens deserve a council member who represents ALL of us, not just the ones she agrees with. —Brandee Lilly
Unfortunate resident of Jessica Alexander's district.
Brandee Lilly
"Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much. "
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:04 PM
To:
'Marisol Roe'
Subject:
RE: I stand with Councilwoman Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.iohl cbtemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Marisol Roe
Subject: I stand with Councilwoman Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello City Clerk,
I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to share my opinion, Councilwoman Alexander speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. Any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning us as well. We call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community. I do not support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community.
Thank you for your time.
Marisol Roe
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:03 PM
To: 'Jessica Christopher'
Subject: RE: #ParentsAreWatching record this into the minutes Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(o)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jessica Christopher ; Zak Schwank ; Maryann Edwards ; James Stewart ; Jessica Alexander
Cc: Randi Johl
Subject: #ParentsAreWatching record this into the minutes Importance: High
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
#Pa rentsAreWatch i ng
Pat Birdsall believed the area was a family -friendly place, which is why she wanted so many parks; please keep that in mind. We support Jessica Alexander, and we don't like Randi 1ohl, who likely leaked the email that Julie Geary is asking people to complain about, AKA, you have a mole. If you want this crazy stuff to stop, you should get rid of Randi Johl.
The lions are awake,
Jessica Christopher
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:03 PM
To: 'Bob Schindler'
Subject: RE: Drag Brunch Experience
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randiJohl(aMemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Bob Schindler
Subject: Fwd: Drag Brunch Experience
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Bob Schindler
Hello Randi
My name is Bob Schindler and I have been a resident of Temecula for over 21 years. I want give my feelings regarding the "Drag Brunch Experience" and the job that Jessica Alexander is doing for our community.
First off I DO NOT support or approve of this so called experience and do not want it welcomed in our community.
Secondly I call on Mr. Matt Rahn and Mr. Zak Schwank to join forces with Jessica in standing for the majority of our community and not approving this "Experience" in Temecula.
I also feel councilwoman Alexander speaks for the majority of our community and all my friends. Any attempt to censure her is censuring and condemning all of us as well.
Thank you for reading this a mail and I hope that you and your and fellow board members agree with our opinion.
Concerned Temecula Resident.
Bob Schindler
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:03 PM
To:
'Karen Brann'
Subject:
RE: Comment
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From: Karen Brann
Subject: Comment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello Temecula city council,
I am a resident of Wildomar. However, I frequent the city of Temecula for shopping, church, and my children's learning and activities. I do believe in a free market society. I believe that it is better to let people see the error in their ways and chose a better path, then force them to see the truth. The principles this country is founded on provide for businesses to pursue success with as little government involvement as possible.
With all of that said, I believe certain types of businesses we allow in our city should be carefully considered. In the case of the drag queen brunch experience, this business should be looked at with caution. Certain questions have to be asked to ensure adults enjoying their freedoms remains within the context of that business and those adults alone. I am thankful for Council woman Jessica Alexander for having the discernment to use caution. There is nothing wrong with being concerned about the influence this business would have on the community. The necessary pause for concern is not bigotry or homophobia. It is a representation of the thoughts that many of us also have. I hope that she will be allowed to show this concern and continue to think of questions that we may not have even considered.
Protecting the innocence and purity of our children is just as valuable as protecting our freedoms as adults. My request is that all of the council members juggles this responsibility in a balanced way.
Thank you,
Karen Brann
Sent from my iPhone
From:
Council Comments
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:01 PM
To:
'Thomas Hartley'
Subject:
RE: I stand with Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.johl .temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Thomas Hartley
Subject: I stand with Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom it may Concern:
I defend and stand with Jessica Alexander City Council member. I question the morality of the people attacking her. We are a conservative town, family, peaceful city. Is there any decency left in this country? We the parents and grandparents will protect our children and family values. Thank you, Josefina
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:03 PM
To: 'C J Van Bruggen'
Subject: RE: Drag Queen Shows in Temecula
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
randi.johlna temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: C J Van Bruggen
Subject: Drag Queen Shows in Temecula
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We support Councilwoman Alexander, who speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. Any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning us as well. We encourage Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community. We have rights too. We do not support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community. In our opinion, these are not the family values of Temecula.
Signed
C. J. Van Bruggen
Barbara Van Bruggen
C. J. (Neal) Van Bruggen
"Telephone System Specialists"
(
California Contractor's License 4890396
Celebrating 41 years of dedicated service to our customers Specializing in Telephone Systems, VOIP Telephones, Computer Networking, Computer Hardware and Programming, Surveillance, Entertainment Systems and Alarm Systems
From: Council Comments
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:01 PM
To: 'Sharlyn Spates'
Subject: RE: Drag Queens
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.iohl(a)temeculaca.aov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Sharlyn Spates
Subject: Drag Queens
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We the people of Temecula, strongly disagree with supporting any and all Drag events. #ParentsAreWatching.
Sharlyn Spates
Real Estate Professional
Allison James Estates & Homes
BRE CA01864927
"Specializing in SOLD"
(
A Home is worth only what a ready willing buyer is willing to pay!
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:03 PM
To: 'Thomas Mckenzie'
Subject: RE: Drag Entertainment
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johlna.temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Thomas Mckenzie
Subject: Drag Entertainment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We would like to go on record to deny access of this venue in our community. There are many venues close by that offer this kind of adult entertainment, but we would like to see Temecula stand firm on being a children, family oriented community. Children are bombarded these days with lots of craziness, and we would like to stand in solidarity of their rights to just be children, and not hurry then into adulthood!! Please protect our children!! Sincerely, The McKenzie and Brewer families
Sent from the all new AOL app for Android
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:02 PM
To:
'Jennifer Raya'
Subject:
RE: This is not ok
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl cbtemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jennifer Raya
Subject: This is not ok
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Randi,
#ParentsAreWatching! This is not acceptable in our Family Friendly Temecula Town! Luis and Jennifer Raya
L:3
0, -
'lab;
ON-
N
LAW
It,
47 AA''.4 �JL\
ik
Sent from my Whone
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:02 PM
To: 'Gayle Kreeger'
Subject: RE: Drag opinion
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Gayle Kreeger ; Zak Schwank ; Maryann Edwards
; Jessica Alexander ; Randi Johl
Subject: Drag opinion
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
2 F
oft
V*
Ap
V
#ParentsAreWatching!
This is not acceptable in our Family Friendly Temecula Town! Michael and Gayle Kreeger
#ParentsAreWatching!
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:02 PM
To:
'Anna Gardner'
Subject:
RE: Concern
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi johl(a)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Anna Gardner
Subject: Concern
13 ♦ w� w w w. w. ,. m y
;'w
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please be aware that as grandparents we want to maintain Temecula as family friendly . We are watching council decisions.
Sent from my iPhone
From: Council Comments
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:00 PM
To:
Subject: RE: Comment For tonight's meeting..
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 3:49 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Comment For tonight's meeting..
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We are becoming increasingly aware of this group causing havoc in our community, this so ca
From:
Council Comments
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:00 PM
To:
Subject:
RE: Drag Brunch
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Rand! Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(o)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Subject: Drag Brunch
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Not in Temecula, please.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:02 PM
To: '
Subject: RE: Letter to be read during public comments tonight Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi. iohVD.temeculaca. gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 3:57 PM
To: Council Comments ; Randi Johl
Cc: Matt Rahn ; Zak Schwank ; Maryann Edwards
; Jessica Alexander ; James Stewart
; Council Assistant
Subject: Letter to be read during public comments tonight CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I understand that "drag queen" shows are allowed under free speech but maybe not in Old Town Temecula. There are rules and regulations for everything and one of them may be that these kinds of venues may not be allowed in Old Town Temecula. Are Bible -believing Christians allowed to have a church in Old Town Temecula? Are there double standards? As some have discriminated against Councilwoman Jessica Alexander for her beliefs, I think most of the public does not want drag queen shows, strip shows, massage parlors, and marijuana shops in Old Town Temecula; it takes away from the character of the city. Can a conservative church or mosque build a steeple next door to the Public House and sing every few hours all day long? Those drag queen shows are noisy. Some may ask how I know that. I didn't know that until I stood outside of the Old Town Temecula Loft a few weeks back when they had a show there. It is very noisy outside.
There is another side to this. Can we stand out on the sidewalk, as our new ministry, and hand out Christian tracts to the people attending these events? It is a target rich environment; people needing hope, peace and real love.
Many of us came to this area to get away from "big city" life and adding drag queen shows is adding this "Big City" life to our communities. I don't want to go to one of these shows but that lifestyle spills out into the public areas and I am not comfortable with that. Do my feelings matter or is it just one sided feelings? I support Jessica Alexander in her quest to keep these types of venues from infiltrating Temecula or Murrieta for that matter. Are strip shows next? If you add these venues in Old Town, you'll need to expand the police vice squad to arrest the people that aren't just looking for a show. Just where are all the trafficked -children from the Mexican border going anyway? Will Temecula be the new center for these poor kids? Bob Kowell
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:06 PM
To: 'Christine Jennings'
Subject: RE: Drag Brunch #notclassy
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl65)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Christine Jennings
Subject: Drag Brunch #notclassy
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
#ParentsAreWatching! This is not acceptable in our Family Friendly Temecula Town! The Jennings Family
Sent from my Whone
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:48 PM
To: 'Colleen Potts'
Subject: RE: I support Councilwoman Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi johl(a)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Colleen Potts
Subject: I support Councilwoman Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
1. To whom it may concern: I support Councilwoman Alexander. I do not support drag queen activities on display in the community.
Respectfully,
Colleen Potts
Sent from my Whone
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:48 PM
To:
'Patrick Sharp'
Subject:
RE: Stand with Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.johl(&temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Patrick Sharp
Subject: Stand with Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I do not support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it in this town. I stand with councilwoman Jessica Alexander, as do a majority of this community, in speaking up against it, which is our right. I call on other council members to stand with the majority of their constituents, who they are suppose to represent, who support Jessica's efforts to block the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience.
Sincerely,
Patrick Sharp
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:50 PM
To:
Subject: RE: Agenda- tonight's meeting re: 50 meter pool Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.'oh 16a)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Nicole ; Zak Schwank ; Jessica Alexander
; James Stewart ; Maryann Edwards
Cc: Council Assistant
Subject: Agenda- tonight's meeting re: 50 meter pool
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good Evening Temecula City Council and fellow residents, We are writing tonight to urge you to consider and then approve the development of a 50 meter pool here in Temecula.
We were fortunate enough to have joined the Swim Team at TMEC a couple of years ago, where we have had the pleasure of watching our son and so many other children / kids develop their swimming skills, be a valued member of a team, and more importantly watch their confidence sore. We attribute this to the amazing staff at TMEC but also to the city for providing the necessary facilities. Swimming is a huge part of our family's life! The popularity of swimming has grown, so much in fact that we are now in a position that requires the ability to enhance the training opportunities of the TMEC program. In order to do so we require more space and a 50 1 foot pool would provide us the space we need, and the pool length necessary to give people the proper training opportunities.
Not only do we want to see our TMEC kids master the art and skill of competitive swim, we also know the importance of all children in our city having another facility to learn how to swim. As parents, and residents of Temecula it is important for us to have a facility that is capable of meeting the needs of Temecula residents — and in this case —the TMEC team.
Thank you for your time,
The Politte Family
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:47 PM
To: '
Subject: RE: I DO NOT SUPPORT THE TEMECULA DRAG QUEEN STUFF AND IT'S NOT WANTED IN OUR COMMUNITY PLEASE!
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:20 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: I DO NOT SUPPORT THE TEMECULA DRAG QUEEN STUFF AND IT'S NOT WANTED IN OUR COMMUNITY PLEASE! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I SUPPORT COUNCIL WOMAN ALEXANDER , MATT RYAN AND ZAK SCHWANK AND DON'T WANT IT WELCOMED IN OUR WONDERFUL CITY PLEASE.
From:
Council Comments
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4AS PM
To:
'Shelby Bunch'
Subject:
RE: Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randiJohVC temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Shelby Bunch
Subject: Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good afternoon,
We are sick and tired of people who claim to want to better our community, yet push events that have the ability to harm it. Adult events should take place in certain districts and in the evenings when children are tucked away safely. Holding a Drag Brunch in the middle of the morning at a ranch was a bad choice. Trying to push out council members for their desire to protect our community is disgraceful. The ranch has exposed themselves for who they are, and they DO NOT stand for our community values. We won't stand for this kind of activity and applaud Jessica Alexander for speaking up for our community. We citizens are done being treated so poorly because of a few twisted individuals, who, rather than having their fun at an appropriate location and time, choose to do it in the middle of our beautiful wine country in the middle of the day.
WE support Jessica Alexander!
Shelby Bunch
(
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:47 PM
To: 'Sandra Sharp'
Subject: RE: I STAND WITH JESSICA ANDREWS
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Rand! Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi. iohl(a)temeculaca.aov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Sandra Sharp
Subject: I STAND WITH JESSICA ANDREWS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I do not support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it in Temecula. I stand with Councilwoman, Jessica Andrews, as do the majority of constituents in this community, in speaking up against it, This is our right; she speaks for us. I call on other council members to stand with the majority of their constituents, who they are supposed to represent, and support Jessica's efforts to block the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience.
Sincerely,
Sandra Sharp
From: Council Comments
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:45 PM
To: 'Holly Childs'
Subject: RE: Oppose the drag show
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i. iohICcDtemecu laca. gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Holly Childs
Subject: Oppose the drag show
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello, I am a resident of Temecula and would like to show my support for Jessica Alexander in opposition of a potential drag show in Temecula. If this becomes a recurring event and Temecula becomes an open LGBTQ area I will no longer be visiting old town especially with my children. This would be unfortunate as we visit old town frequently and enjoy the restaurants and shops.
Thank you, Holly Childs
From:
Council Comments
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:45 PM
To:
'
Subject:
RE: Drag queens
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message -----
From:
Subject: Drag queens
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We are in total agreement of Jessica Alexander in opposition of drag queens in Temecula, especially at venues near where our young children will be in attendance. This belongs in a closed private club, not in an area near our children.
Dan & Vicki Copple
Temecula residents
Protect our children!
Sent from my iPhone
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:47 PM
To: 'Jeannie Rivenbark'
Subject: RE: Support for Council woman Jessica Alexander free speech and Opposition to Drag Shows in Temecula!!
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(o)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jeannie Rivenbark ; Randi Johl ; Jessica
Alexander
Subject: Support for Council woman Jessica Alexander free speech and Opposition to Drag Shows in Temecula!! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom it concerns,
As a 20 year Temecula resident, I am writing to defend Jessica Alexander's right to free speech and support her speaking out against drag shows coming into our community. While there may be some audience for this style of 'entertainment', I believe there is a large majority of this city's population that does not want it in our city. We have long been known as a family friendly community and a safe place to raise kids. As drag shows become more prevalent and tolerated, it can open the door for more drag time story hours for children, etc., ... we know there is already an agenda out there to sexualize children at a very young age - and to teach gender studies to 5-8 year olds!! If adults want to go see a drag show, let them go to Vegas. I firmly believe most Temecula residents do not want drag shows in our city. This opinion does not make me homophobic or transphobic or any other kind of phobic. I don't hate anyone or begrudge a restaurant trying to make money/bring in business. But I fear going in this direction invites an immoral element that will eventually degrade our community values.
Sincerely,
Jeannie Rivenbark
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:46 PM
To: 'Carol Haley'
Subject: RE: Temecula Drag Brunch
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
rand i.johl temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Carol Haley
Subject: Temecula Drag Brunch
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Randi,
I do not support Temecula Drag Brunch. Although people have the right to conduct their lives as they wish, it is an outward sinful display of their inward sinful lifestyle. This lifestyle is not of God and should not be acknowledged as acceptable behavior. They can live their life as they want, but the City of Temecula, as a family based community, should not agree to support this brunch.
God created man and woman. 2 genders. Gen 2:9, Gen 21-22 The Devil has come to steal, kill and destroy. John 10:10 Satan has been working hard from the beginning of the fall with Adam and Eve to destroy mankind and turn us from the knowledge of God, by living in our sin, and not repenting and turning to God. We are beautifully and wonderfully made, made by God and in His image. God does not make mistakes or junk.
God is not the author of confusion. The Devil is. It is the sin of man kind and the work of the enemy to tell people they do not know who they are, tell them lies, and confuse them. This spirit has permeated our culture, schools, and society.
All these people who do not have natural affection, or think they are a different gender than how they were born, are being ensnared by the Devil and his lies.
In love, we should minister to them to come to the knowledge of Jesus Christ that they might repent and be saved. I do not support being mean, rude or judgmental. But speak the truth in love and let God do the work in their heart.
This Temecula Drag Brunch is not of God and should not be promoted and excepted.
This sinful behavior is a slap in the face to God who created them in His image. And this is not His image. We, as Christians, are to uphold the Word of Truth and walk in love.
I hope that you will consider the negative impact this will have on our family based community. We are a conservative community, with Godly morals and values.
It's time for Temecula City Council to stand up for what is right! Please vote NO to not allow the Temecula Drag Brunch.
Thank you for your time,
Carol Haley
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:46 PM
To:
'
Subject:
RE: Jessica Alexander
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy.
If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE
Legislative Director / City Clerk
(951)694-6421
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Subject: Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To whom it may concern,
It has come to my attention that there is an attempt to censure councilmember Jessica Alexander for standing for moral integrity in this community. Mrs. Alexander was elected for many reasons one of which is that she represents the values that the community collectively holds and she stands for during times such as these.
A Temecula Drag Brunch is not something that will benefit the community at large and only will sow seeds of division in this community.
Right now we need events and groups that will bring us together not tear us apart.
I call on other councilmembers to stand with Mrs. Alexander and oppose a drag brunch as any type of official community event.
Sent with ProtonMail secure email.
From: Robert Gyori <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:09 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: April 26, 2022 City Hall meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
1. Councilwoman Alexander speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. Any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning us as well.
2. We call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community.
3. I do not support support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community
Marika
From: Tia Carol <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:17 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: Support for Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Greetings Randi Johl,
1. I offer my support for Councilwoman Alexander because she speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. Any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning me and everyone else who holds our opinions as well.
2. 1 call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community.
3. 1 do not support support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience as it spreads gender confusion to our youth and I do not want it welcomed in our community
Respectfully,
Carol Coleman (retired elementary school teacher)
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:26 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: Temecula Drag Queens
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Temecula City Council,
My name is Pamela Schindler
I am a resident of Temecula. I am standing with Jessica Alexander in protest of the Drag Queens events in our Community.
Jessica speaks for the majority of our community and condemning Jessica condemns us all! I would hope that Matt Rahn & Zak Schwank consider joining Jessica Alexander and her stand for our community! Thank you
Pamela Schindler
Sent from my Whone
From: Alanna Willson <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:27 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: Jessica Alexander and the meeting tonight
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
City of Temecula
It has come to my attention that Councilwoman Jessica Alexander is being singled out by the group Temecula Unity for stating her view regarding the City of Temecula welcoming and giving its stamp of approval for the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience. The group is calling for the censure and condemning of her for speaking out. Councilwoman Alexander speaks on behalf of the majority of our community and in support of children who will be confused and influenced by this.
She should be free to express our concerns. The City Council should support her and not bow down to Temecula Unity.
I call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community. I do not support the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community because it gives community approval for what is contrary to biological science and the natural order of life.
Sincerely,
Alanna Willson
From: Julie Geary <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:31 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: public comment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
In the United States we have the bill of rights that legally protects business and individuals to free speech and peaceful assembly. The government can not close business which they personally don't like. Under this amendment and set with legal precedence of the "lemon test", the government can not establish or give special privileges to any particular religion. Jessica Alexander violated the first amendment when she used government resources to curtail the actions of a local business citing her religion as just cause. She also publicly defamed the character of local Igbt business owners which is against the anti discrimination clause to our California Constitution, which she swore to uphold and defend. We can not and must not allow a city council member to violate our constitution while in office. I am calling for a formal censure and to remove Jessica Alexander from all city committees and business as she openly discriminates against others and uses her religious ideology to guide her decision making in government rather than the constitution. She is opening up our city to lawsuits which puts our taxpayer resources in jeopardy. Enough is enough, what is it going to take for the city to do something about this?
-Julie Geary
From: Sonia Perez https://cspoa.org
http://www.eatingoffthevine.com/
https://www.ftbagency.com/
CSPOA
f- Constitutional Sheriffs
is and Peace Officers
AlbaAssociation
BRF,41Ty
11 c
LU
2oZ0
From: Cindy Kennedy www.safewise.com/blog/safest-cities-california/#list
From:
KRISTINA CLOWERS <
Sent:
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 S:S3 PM
To:
Randi Johl
Subject:
Fwd: Temecula -Jessica Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Krissi Clowers
Begin forwarded message:
From: KRISTINA CLOWERS <
Date: April 26, 2022 at 5:39:02 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Temecula -Jessica Alexander
I would like to voice my opinion and the shared opinion of ALL my neighbors, family, and friends regarding the "Drag Brunch Experience" here in Temecula. I strongly urge you to listen to the community and not welcome this type of "experience".
Councilwoman Jessica Alexander speaks for the vast majority of families within this community. Any attempts to silence or censor her position and voice is essentially silencing us as well.
I urge Zack Schwank and Matt Rahn to join Ms. Alexander to oppose this type of "experience" in OUR community. It is not welcome here and we do not want our children subjected to this.
Krissi
From: Tish B <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 6:09 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Transgender and the Unity Group
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I'm writing this in regards to the Trans reading program that the Temecula Unity Group is trying to bring into our Community. I feel that this should NOT be brought into our Community, most parents I have spoken to are against it, and you give That Fake Unity Group too much Power in Our Valley! The things being allowed into Our Beautiful City will lead to the downfall of Our Beautiful Town. There's a reason so many people have flocked to this Gorgeous Valley, and it's rooted in Family Values, not Pornography and Sin!
Sent from my Whone
From: Karen Harkey <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 6:37 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Drag brunch
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
" a little leaven leavens the whole lump"
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
From: Sue F <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 6:48 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: I Stand in Support of Councilwoman Alexander!!! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Councilwoman Alexander speaks for the overwhelming majority of our community. Any attempt to censure or condemn her is censuring and condemning us as well.
We call on Matt Rahn and Zak Schwank to join Jessica Alexander in standing for the majority of our community.
I do not support support, on any level, the Temecula Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it welcomed in our community!!!!
From: Fredric Ball <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 7:32 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: Councilperson Alexander
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi -
I have been a resident of Temecula for almost 17 years, and this is the second time I have written to the city in the last year, and both times it is about the heinous verbiage and actions of Jessica Alexander.
While the city itself is not responsible for the above, I think it hurts all of you, and us, when her hateful language is put out into the universe when she represents our city. I am speaking of her recent homophobic comments to the Press Enterprise about the Drag Brunch in wine country. (See below for my letter personally written to her).
As representatives for the city, you must know that she used her city email to openly discriminate against an LGBT business.
She also defamed the character of the two Drag Brunch owner/operators, Chad and Anthony, and questioned their morality by calling them evil.
If she wants to spout her homophobic nonsense, she needs to do it as a civilian and not via the resources of our city. This behavior is ironic since she considers herself Christ -like. Far from it! There needs to be consequences for her actions.
I thank you in advance for reading this,
Fredric Ball
92591
In a recent Press -Enterprise article, you said,"This is not something we want to see in our city ... I personally believe this kind of behavior doesn't bring a good atmosphere — we don't want Vegas here in Temecula."
Who is this "we" you are talking about? Have you talked to everyone in the city or just your church members? I am guessing it is the latter.
As for "not bring(ing) a good atmosphere," have you seen Old Town on a weekend night? Or any place that serves alcohol in the city? If you looked at the videos posted on the organizers' Instagram, you will see that the audience is mainly young adult to middle aged women, not the demographic for bar brawls or shootings. Many are in attendance for bachelorette parties, and they are there to dance, sing, and have a good time with their friends - DURING THE DAY.
While you fear "lower property values ... and ... increase in crime, vandalism and litter," again, have you SEEN the people who attend the events? None look especially seedy or dangerous. Do you really think that these woman are engaged in "possible lewd or sexual acts"? Women about to get married? With their fiancees and mothers, aunts, and grandmothers?
Couple this brunch with your recent comments about the Drag Story Time in Riverside, and it seems like your problem is with gay people. (P.S. As a 53 year old gay man who was raised reading stories only about heterosexuals... you can see that "grooming" is another red herring that the conservative "wrong" use to incite fear.
Speaking of the book store, you said, "What bothers me is, there is obviously an agenda that these individuals have and they are pushing it on our youth." Agenda: to encourage young people to read? To show how reading and learning can be fun? What about YOUR agenda? We all have our own faith and values, but why should you force yours on others? Christianity is not the only religion in this country, and your ilk seem to have co-opted it and weaponized it for hate.
From: Richard White <
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 7:47 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Why are you opening up the community to destruction??? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi,
I'm a concerned citizen that has been living in the area for about 6 years now. When I moved here, I stayed because this area wasn't big city living that includes all the evils of living in a big city. Big cities have lots of crimes and homelessness, and they also have no ethics, morals, values, prinicple's, or foundations on which they stand for. This city of Temecula was/is more country style and more Christian and family oriented with values and morals to raise kids by. Any group that is promoting lewd and disgusting behavior openly in front of children should not be welcomed here.
Just a few years ago there was a well know evil pedophile, that democrats with their lack of morals, released from prison and made his way to this area. He was quickly run out of town for the safety of everyones kids. That type of behavior is not welcomed here. It shouldn't be. That type of behavior doesnt belong anywhere, but definitely not in the Temecula type of area where we have Christian values and want to protect the children and raise them with strong convictions and a healthy moral foundation.
Jessica is fighting to keep the wholeness and purity of this community and she should be supported, not attacked. This is a Godly community with values and morals and should be protected. We respect each other and want to protect the children. This is not "sin city" Vegas, or any style of living close to that. It should be protected. A group, or "unity group" that wants to bring lewd misconduct and behavior out into the open to groom children is definitely uncalled for and disrespectful to the people of this community.
That type of group brings and supports: lewd sexual conduct, mental illness, child grooming and pedophilia, and it also sends the message to others that the city is welcoming to evil acts that corrupt innocent people. To let a group openly have "drag" shows in broad daylight will slowly diminish the beauty of the city as more un-Godly criminal behavior gets attracted to the tolerance of letting morals slip away. Jessica is fighting to protect the goodness of this community and you should as well, OR YOU WILL BE REPLACED.
We dont need this area turning into another big city style of life that has chaos and un-Godly criminal behavior running free through the city day and night. This is not the area for that, and that gay couple promoting this atrocious behavior need to understand that this behavior of theirs to indoctrinate the children into their lifestyle is not accepted. They moved to the area because they liked the wholeness of it, and now they are trying to destroy it. DON'T LET THEM.
1 If you wanted to be an elected official to preserve the beauty of the area, then do so. If not, then RESIGN, or be replaced by those who will, like your fellow councilwoman Jessica, and more like her. Think about it, do you want your kids, grandkids, nieces and nephews raised in the chaos of sin, or big city type of chaos that lets all evil get by? Every inch you give that gets communities further and further away from Godly behavior is another inch closer to evil and violence. Saying "its legal" is not an acceptable form of allowing evil to grow. You can't be a Christian if you knowingly and purposely let evil in the door.
Stand with Jessica in opposition to the vile acts of evil and the attacks against her by that evil "unity group", or be replaced by those who will. Preserve the value of the city, the reason you stay and live here, before its gone.
Sincerely,
An angry and concerned citizen
2 From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Wednesday, April 27, 2022 9:48 AM
To:
Erika Ramirez
Subject:
Fwd: Against Drag Brunch Experience
Verified City Account
From: Cathy Pargee
Subject: Against Drag Brunch Experience
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
As a long time Temecula Valley resident, I want to voice my opposition to the Drag Brunch Experience and do not want it coming to our community. You may have already voted, or it is still under consideration, but I join Councilwoman Alexander and the overwhelming majority of those in our community who want to protect our children from this indoctrination and confusion it causes to our growing children.
Catherine Pargee
Wildomar, CA
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Wednesday, April 27, 2022 11:S0 AM
To:
Erika Ramirez
Subject:
Fwd: Drag Show Brunch Opposition
Verified City Account
From: Jordyn Cid
Subject: Drag Show Brunch Opposition
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi there,
I have lived in the Menifee/Temecula area almost all of my life. I now have a family and three children I am raising here.
My husband commutes to San Diego and LA for work. Do you know why we and many other families don't live in the cities we commute to? For reasons like this one.
We choose this place because it is safe. Because it is wholesome. Because it is a family community.
If people want events like this they should move to places where they already have it. North Park, Hillcrest, Hollywood etc.
This doesn't belong in Temecula and ESPECIALLY doesn't belong in the middle of the day on Front Street.
If you walked up and down Old Town on weekend days you would see families. Strollers, toddlers, school age children, middle school children, teenagers, moms, dads, grandparents etc.
We don't need to turn the corner and have to explain to our kids what a drag queen is. This is not right, and this is not Temecula. If this gets approved Temecula will start circling the drain. It won't be immediate. It won't be overnight but eventually our schools will suffer. Our nice public areas will suffer. Our neighborhoods will suffer. This type of event will be a catapult to a whole change in lifestyle and community.
So, this email is to show my opposition!
Jordyn