Cities Index.
Agenda

Temecula City Council
January 27, 2026

Document
Agenda
Meeting
January 27, 2026
Body
Temecula City Council
Pages
109
Original file
2.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on laserfiche.temeculaca.gov. That file is the official record.

Anza Road Btwn
Peppercorn Drive & Drymen Avenue
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
4 8
0 11
12:15
0 8
3 11
12:30
2 12
0 13
12:45
3 13
9 41
1 7
4 42
13 83
01:00
1 11
1 7
01:15
0 11
0 1
01:30
0 12
0 11
01:45
1 6
2 40
0 4
1 23
3 63
02:00
0 13
0 13
02:15
3 11
1 30
02:30
0 53
0 20
02:45
0 48
3 125
0 26
1 89
4 214
03:00
0 22
1 21
03:15
1 20
1 57
03:30
1 102
0 47
03:45
0 90
2 234
0 20
2 145
4 379
04:00
0 39
0 14
04:15
1 17
0 7
04:30
0 30
5 15
04:45
0 19
1 105
1 15
6 51
7 156
05:00
0 32
5 9
05:15
0 33
2 13
05:30
0 36
10 5
05:45
2 21
2 122
11 9
28 36
30 158
06:00
0 20
7 8
06:15
3 18
10 7
06:30
1 23
11 7
06:45
3 11
7 72
8 9
36 31
43 103
07:00
1 17
17 9
07:15
5 20
13 7
07:30
9 24
25 7
07:45
13 12
28 73
35 4
90 27
118
100
08:00
27 19
127
5 08:15
59 17
117
6 08:30
61 10
33 5
08:45
15 11
162
57 12
5 289
21 451
78 09:00
15 8
7 8
09:15
11 11
21 3
09:30
9 10
12 2
09:45
5 7
40 36
6 1
46 14
86 50
10:00
5 9
9 3
10:15
5 1
8 6
10:30
11 8
8 1
10:45
6 3
27 21
8 1
33 11
60 32
11:00
12 4
4 3
11:15
8 6
3 2
11:30
12 5
2 4
11:45
11 51
43 20
1 6
3 15
12 58
32 Total
326
946
551
502
877
1448
Percent

25.6%

74.4%

52.3%

47.7%

37.7%

62.3%
Grand
326
946
551
502
877
1448
Total
Percent

25.6%

74.4%

52.3%

47.7%

37.7%

62.3%
ADT ADT 2,325 AADT 2,325

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Commerce Center Dirve Btwn
Via Montezuma & Overland Drive
Start 5/28/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
0 42
0 47
12:15
0 33
0 39
12:30
0 36
0 26
12:45
1 42
1 153
0 45
0 157
1 310
01:00
0 26
0 35
01:15
0 39
0 33
01:30
1 29
0 33
01:45
0 47
1 141
0 34
0 135
1 276
02:00
0 29
1 32
02:15
1 41
0 29
02:30
0 38
2 35
02:45
0 44
1 152
0 42
3 138
4 290
03:00
0 44
0 43
03:15
0 43
0 25
03:30
1 44
1 35
03:45
0 42
1 173
2 32
3 135
4 308
04:00
2 34
2 29
04:15
1 58
2 38
04:30
1 42
2 38
04:45
1 36
5 170
4 36
10 141
15 311
05:00
2 41
0 23
05:15
0 37
1 29
05:30
2 35
1 26
05:45
4 17
8 130
8 16
10 94
18 224
06:00
3 13
2 17
06:15
5 7
14 12
06:30
6 17
17 17
06:45
2 14
16 51
16 18
49 64
65 115
07:00
8 6
22 14
07:15
14 7
30 14
07:30
11 6
27 10
07:45
12 5
45 24
27 8
106
46 151
70 08:00
16 1
37 6
08:15
23 7
20 8
08:30
19 14
32 8
08:45
33 2
91 24
30 11
119
33 210
57 09:00
24 7
29 5
09:15
36 1
40 5
09:30
30 2
39 7
09:45
28 5
118
15 41
2 149
19 267
34 10:00
37 3
38 3
10:15
33 6
30 1
10:30
38 1
28 3
10:45
25 3
133
13 24
0 120
7 253
20 11:00
37 1
26 1
11:15
44 0
36 0
11:30
44 1
39 0
11:45
39 0
164
21 39
21 140
3 304
5 Total
584
1048
709
972
1293
2020
Percent

35.8%

64.2%

42.2%

57.8%

39.0%

61.0%
Grand
584
1048
709
972
1293
2020
Total
Percent

35.8%

64.2%

42.2%

57.8%

39.0%

61.0%
ADT ADT 3,313 AADT 3,313

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Commerce Center Dirve Btwn
Overland Drive & Rider Way
Start 5/28/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
0 21
0 14
12:15
2 14
0 12
12:30
0 9
0 2
12:45
1 21
3 65
0 5
0 33
3 98
01:00
1 28
0 9
01:15
0 25
0 6
01:30
0 20
0 6
01:45
0 23
1 96
0 9
0 30
1 126
02:00
0 17
0 5
02:15
0 15
0 6
02:30
0 19
0 8
02:45
0 12
0 63
0 10
0 29
0 92
03:00
0 7
0 6
03:15
0 13
0 9
03:30
0 23
0 4
03:45
0 21
0 64
0 8
0 27
0 91
04:00
0 11
0 8
04:15
0 17
0 12
04:30
0 23
0 11
04:45
0 24
0 75
0 20
0 51
0 126
05:00
0 15
0 9
05:15
0 14
0 11
05:30
1 10
0 11
05:45
2 5
3 44
0 5
0 36
3 80
06:00
1 10
0 9
06:15
0 4
2 7
06:30
0 3
1 4
06:45
2 2
3 19
3 2
6 22
9 41
07:00
0 5
0 11
07:15
3 4
0 6
07:30
7 3
3 4
07:45
0 4
10 16
0 4
3 25
13 41
08:00
12 0
4 4
08:15
10 0
6 3
08:30
9 1
3 1
08:45
12 1
43 2
7 3
20 11
63 13
09:00
22 2
6 2
09:15
22 1
4 0
09:30
19 3
12 0
09:45
25 0
88 6
7 2
29 4
117
10 10:00
18 2
10 2
10:15
19 2
9 1
10:30
22 3
8 2
10:45
15 1
74 8
6 0
33 5
107
13 11:00
24 1
6 0
11:15
27 0
11 0
11:30
11 0
10 0
11:45
17 0
79 1
1 4
01 31
0 110
1 Total
304
459
122
273
426
732
Percent

39.8%

60.2%

30.9%

69.1%

36.8%

63.2%
Grand
304
459
122
273
426
732
Total
Percent

39.8%

60.2%

30.9%

69.1%

36.8%

63.2%
ADT ADT 1,158 AADT 1,158

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Deer Hollow Way Btwn
Pechanga Parkway & Via La Colorado
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
8 45
4 43
12:15
7 38
8 37
12:30
10 41
10 43
12:45
10 51
35 175
5 42
27 165
62 340
01:00
2 45
1 49
01:15
4 67
6 49
01:30
3 57
3 65
01:45
4 53
13 222
3 40
13 203
26 425
02:00
6 56
3 47
02:15
7 72
1 45
02:30
5 138
3 85
02:45
1 83
19 349
2 57
9 234
28 583
03:00
3 86
3 60
03:15
4 108
3 94
03:30
1 253
4 169
03:45
4 157
12 604
6 93
16 416
28 1020
04:00
6 133
9 57
04:15
4 134
9 51
04:30
3 137
14 65
04:45
5 150
18 554
12 62
44 235
62 789
05:00
3 130
23 66
05:15
2 151
25 67
05:30
4 143
58 68
05:45
6 125
15 549
66 54
172
255
187
804
06:00
8 129
70 38
06:15
6 95
75 40
06:30
14 80
71 45
06:45
12 65
40 369
70 48
286
171
326
540
07:00
16 80
79 34
07:15
34 45
77 31
07:30
43 61
97 44
07:45
73 44
166
230
113
33 366
142
532
372
08:00
107
42 104
27 08:15
198
36 134
28 08:30
60 31
142
28 08:45
34 39
399
148
83 23
463
106
862
254
09:00
35 24
47 19
09:15
44 30
73 19
09:30
39 15
56 22
09:45
22 19
140
88 41
21 217
81 357
169
10:00
34 22
48 4
10:15
29 20
44 10
10:30
40 19
37 12
10:45
32 13
135
74 41
6 170
32 305
106
11:00
45 18
33 8
11:15
34 14
42 9
11:30
34 15
36 10
11:45
38 11
151
581
39 21
150
29 301
87 Total
1143
3420
1933
2069
3076
5489
Percent

25.0%

75.0%

48.3%

51.7%

35.9%

64.1 %
Grand
1143
3420
1933
2069
3076
5489
Total
Percent

25.0%

75.0%

48.3%

51.7%

35.9%

64.1 %
ADT ADT 8,565 AADT 8,565

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Deer Hollow Way Btwn
Via La Colorado & Peppercorn Drive
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
6 62
4 50
12:15
5 38
9 44
12:30
6 37
7 50
12:45
7 48
24 185
6 53
26 197
50 382
01:00
2 42
3 51
01:15
1 52
6 38
01:30
4 54
3 54
01:45
4 41
11 189
2 55
14 198
25 387
02:00
4 61
4 59
02:15
8 53
1 76
02:30
3 187
2 78
02:45
0 98
15 399
0 78
7 291
22 690
03:00
1 75
2 104
03:15
5 103
2 187
03:30
1 314
4 149
03:45
2 246
9 738
3 82
11 522
20 1260
04:00
5 153
7 65
04:15
2 130
6 66
04:30
3 138
10 73
04:45
4 124
14 545
5 94
28 298
42 843
05:00
2 146
21 73
05:15
3 133
23 84
05:30
6 113
45 70
05:45
4 124
15 516
63 72
152
299
167
815
06:00
9 117
60 49
06:15
7 88
78 58
06:30
15 82
72 54
06:45
14 77
45 364
73 60
283
221
328
585
07:00
12 62
91 33
07:15
35 39
103
47 07:30
34 54
115
47 07:45
53 40
134
195
168
37 477
164
611
359
08:00
113
47 259
41 08:15
202
38 315
44 08:30
131
28 105
35 08:45
36 31
482
144
72 24
751
144
1233
288
09:00
39 28
60 27
09:15
38 26
89 15
09:30
41 21
53 17
09:45
35 16
153
91 45
24 247
83 400
174
10:00
25 22
54 8
10:15
29 18
40 12
10:30
38 16
41 14
10:45
41 7
133
63 40
9 175
43 308
106
11:00
47 14
40 12
11:15
34 9
40 10
11:30
34 14
40 8
11:45
32 11
147
48 53
31 173
33 320
81 Total
1182
3477
2344
2493
3526
5970
Percent

25.4%

74.6%

48.5%

51.5%

37.1 %

62.9%
Grand
1182
3477
2344
2493
3526
5970
Total
Percent

25.4%

74.6%

48.5%

51.5%

37.1%

62.9%
ADT ADT 9,496 AADT 9,496

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOLINTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

La Serena Way Btwn
Margarita Road & Calle Pina Colada
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
9 75
2 69
12:15
7 62
6 75
12:30
5 77
2 76
12:45
4 73
25 287
1 74
11 294
36 581
01:00
3 70
1 68
01:15
1 71
3 79
01:30
2 71
0 89
01:45
2 76
8 288
1 51
5 287
13 575
02:00
2 84
4 76
02:15
1 89
1 81
02:30
1 89
3 116
02:45
3 129
7 391
6 87
14 360
21 751
03:00
1 97
4 65
03:15
2 101
11 137
03:30
0 115
7 129
03:45
0 120
3 433
11 93
33 424
36 857
04:00
0 129
10 83
04:15
2 97
18 89
04:30
4 97
22 93
04:45
5 97
11 420
47 86
97 351
108
771
05:00
3 118
37 79
05:15
4 117
43 80
05:30
3 127
36 86
05:45
7 107
17 469
34 86
150
331
167
800
06:00
6 85
30 59
06:15
20 69
45 52
06:30
20 63
48 46
06:45
16 72
62 289
65 49
188
206
250
495
07:00
30 68
75 44
07:15
30 62
69 34
07:30
43 71
149
27 07:45
68 59
171
260
179
38 472
143
643
403
08:00
60 64
135
22 08:15
70 54
131
34 08:30
81 42
125
17 08:45
61 42
272
202
128
27 519
100
791
302
09:00
50 49
82 22
09:15
43 32
90 17
09:30
40 26
84 22
09:45
47 34
180
141
80 16
336
77 516
218
10:00
51 25
77 10
10:15
54 18
83 8
10:30
43 11
92 5
10:45
59 11
207
65 77
5 329
28 536
93 11:00
64 11
76 2
11:15
63 12
70 4
11:30
53 7
86 5
11:45
53 10
233
401
68 2
300
13 533
53 Total
1196
3285
2454
2614
3650
5899
Percent

26.7%

73.3%

48.4%

51.6%

38.2%

61.8%
Grand
1196
3285
2454
2614
3650
5899
Total
Percent

26.7%

73.3%

48.4%

51.6%

38.2%

61.8%
ADT ADT 9,549 AADT 9,549

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

La Serena Way Btwn
Calle Pina Colada & Meadows Parkway
Start 6/3/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
12 63
3 83
12:15
6 59
6 73
12:30
4 75
3 77
12:45
1 74
23 271
1 80
13 313
36 584
01:00
2 74
3 62
01:15
1 77
3 83
01:30
1 70
0 90
01:45
2 69
6 290
1 55
7 290
13 580
02:00
2 71
2 85
02:15
2 102
2 76
02:30
2 111
2 113
02:45
0 141
6 425
1 94
7 368
13 793
03:00
2 110
4 88
03:15
1 108
6 161
03:30
0 103
1 128
03:45
1 122
4 443
7 115
18 492
22 935
04:00
0 126
7 98
04:15
1 95
10 101
04:30
3 100
12 92
04:45
4 89
8 410
26 86
55 377
63 787
05:00
6 129
24 86
05:15
5 121
27 90
05:30
2 128
27 84
05:45
11 105
24 483
22 88
100
348
124
831
06:00
7 95
20 63
06:15
18 83
37 58
06:30
19 68
38 46
06:45
18 58
62 304
56 43
151
210
213
514
07:00
33 77
63 50
07:15
37 66
72 46
07:30
65 44
150
30 07:45
89 32
224
219
145
36 430
162
654
381
08:00
86 41
117
26 08:15
91 45
124
34 08:30
89 43
134
21 08:45
55 36
321
165
135
17 510
98 831
263
09:00
58 28
82 25
09:15
40 21
87 12
09:30
47 19
77 18
09:45
48 20
193
88 76
17 322
72 515
160
10:00
50 21
69 10
10:15
58 13
86 9
10:30
44 16
89 3
10:45
54 8
206
58 72
4 316
26 522
84 11:00
62 9
75 2
11:15
57 4
68 3
11:30
57 6
81 5
11:45
56 4
232
23 77
5 301
15 533
38 Total
1309
3179
2230
2771
3539
5950
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

44.6%

55.4%

37.3%

62.7%
Grand
1309
3179
2230
2771
3539
5950
Total
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

44.6%

55.4%

37.3%

62.7%
ADT ADT 9,489 AADT 9,489

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

La Serena Way Btwn
Meadows Parkway & Calle Medusa
Start 6/3/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
8 54
3 75
12:15
5 65
5 71
12:30
1 64
2 74
12:45
1 69
15 252
1 73
11 293
26 545
01:00
3 67
4 50
01:15
2 60
4 80
01:30
3 71
0 79
01:45
1 69
9 267
4 62
12 271
21 538
02:00
2 57
3 79
02:15
4 88
2 103
02:30
2 98
2 120
02:45
2 100
10 343
1 107
8 409
18 752
03:00
1 85
5 109
03:15
1 120
5 114
03:30
0 99
1 103
03:45
4 125
6 429
7 101
18 427
24 856
04:00
0 109
3 98
04:15
3 90
8 94
04:30
1 92
19 99
04:45
6 85
10 376
22 87
52 378
62 754
05:00
5 101
20 86
05:15
3 124
20 86
05:30
4 111
27 89
05:45
11 109
23 445
17 73
84 334
107
779
06:00
13 83
20 63
06:15
15 72
42 56
06:30
20 54
39 39
06:45
16 55
64 264
64 44
165
202
229
466
07:00
32 56
63 39
07:15
50 57
77 42
07:30
59 39
163
29 07:45
68 28
209
180
151
35 454
145
663
325
08:00
76 28
141
24 08:15
74 54
145
22 08:30
83 31
143
15 08:45
63 28
296
141
98 7
527
68 823
209
09:00
48 31
77 1
09:15
38 19
80 6
09:30
50 11
77 7
09:45
44 16
180
77 73
17 307
31 487
108
10:00
49 15
72 12
10:15
54 12
93 9
10:30
50 11
76 3
10:45
39 8
192
46 74
2 315
26 507
72 11:00
55 6
75 3
11:15
52 4
67 3
11:30
53 3
61 1
11:45
52 6
212
191
77 0
280
7 492
26 Total
1226
2839
2233
2591
3459
5430
Percent

30.2%

69.8%

46.3%

53.7%

38.9%

61.1 %
Grand
1226
2839
2233
2591
3459
5430
Total
Percent

30.2%

69.8%

46.3%

53.7%

38.9%

61.1%
ADT ADT 8,889 AADT 8,889

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOLINTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

La Serena Way Btwn
Calle Medusa & Butterfield Stage Road
Start 6/3/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
8 46
2 44
12:15
6 56
3 47
12:30
0 61
3 44
12:45
2 53
16 216
1 48
9 183
25 399
01:00
3 68
3 41
01:15
1 54
3 44
01:30
2 61
0 43
01:45
1 55
7 238
4 43
10 171
17 409
02:00
3 63
2 57
02:15
2 76
2 67
02:30
1 87
2 58
02:45
1 82
7 308
1 67
7 249
14 557
03:00
1 69
3 82
03:15
1 98
3 78
03:30
0 90
2 68
03:45
4 102
6 359
4 62
12 290
18 649
04:00
0 81
3 68
04:15
2 79
4 71
04:30
3 81
12 60
04:45
8 69
13 310
7 59
26 258
39 568
05:00
8 104
4 67
05:15
2 123
12 73
05:30
4 114
16 66
05:45
12 89
26 430
9 57
41 263
67 693
06:00
10 73
10 46
06:15
17 58
20 40
06:30
26 42
21 30
06:45
19 52
72 225
38 28
89 144
161
369
07:00
32 49
34 34
07:15
45 53
49 34
07:30
50 43
90 31
07:45
67 29
194
174
80 19
253
118
447
292
08:00
54 23
68 23
08:15
66 40
93 17
08:30
72 25
91 24
08:45
52 28
244
116
85 19
337
83 581
199
09:00
46 23
53 13
09:15
35 19
53 19
09:30
53 15
43 12
09:45
43 11
177
68 43
17 192
61 369
129
10:00
35 14
34 14
10:15
47 9
68 9
10:30
42 11
55 15
10:45
38 6
162
40 42
4 199
42 361
82 11:00
48 5
58 2
11:15
50 1
49 9
11:30
49 5
36 4
11:45
39 21
186
131
52 5
195
201
381
33 Total
1110
2497
1370
1882
2480
4379
Percent

30.8%

69.2%

42.1 %

57.9%

36.2%

63.8%
Grand
1110
2497
1370
1882
2480
4379
Total
Percent

30.8%

69.2%

42.1 %

57.9%

36.2%

63.8%
ADT
ADT 6,859
AADT 6,859

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOLINTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
North City Limit & Rustic Glen Drive
Start 6/3/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
0 103
0 176
12:15
0 116
0 165
12:30
0 131
0 154
12:45
17 116
17 466
6 144
6 639
23 1105
01:00
11 112
7 168
01:15
14 113
2 147
01:30
6 144
6 126
01:45
9 140
40 509
6 134
21 575
61 1084
02:00
11 159
6 129
02:15
10 141
3 119
02:30
3 148
2 124
02:45
10 137
34 585
0 129
11 501
45 1086
03:00
4 159
3 138
03:15
6 162
2 125
03:30
4 132
2 143
03:45
5 145
19 598
4 153
11 559
30 1157
04:00
3 186
0 194
04:15
4 185
5 167
04:30
8 212
5 155
04:45
6 183
21 766
6 138
16 654
37 1420
05:00
13 167
12 131
05:15
17 188
15 137
05:30
18 173
19 127
05:45
18 233
66 761
21 140
67 535
133
1296
06:00
19 220
38 128
06:15
15 263
40 113
06:30
20 202
65 106
06:45
24 213
78 898
56 111
199
458
277
1356
07:00
30 185
49 82
07:15
23 127
83 89
07:30
39 163
107
61 07:45
38 161
130
636
85 67
324
299
454
935
08:00
56 120
83 68
08:15
66 90
118
63 08:30
111
99 139
49 08:45
85 67
318
376
125
68 465
248
783
624
09:00
95 85
163
44 09:15
114
83 146
39 09:30
111
85 146
46 09:45
101
76 421
329
87 29
542
158
963
487
10:00
82 68
100
49 10:15
75 60
98 41
10:30
78 52
112
26 10:45
84 63
319
243
128
29 438
145
757
388
11:00
94 41
119
26 11:15
120
40 114
17 11:30
90 14
121
17 11:45
137
33 441
128
1 159
121
513
72 954
200
Total
1904
6295
2613
4843
4517
11138
Percent

23.2%

76.8%

35.0%

65.0%

28.9%

71.1 %
Grand
1904
6295
2613
4843
4517
11138
Total
Percent

23.2%

76.8%

35.0%

65.0%

28.9%

71.1%
ADT ADT 15,655 AADT 15,655

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Rustic Glen Drive & Harveston Way
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
15 127
4 127
12:15
10 141
6 129
12:30
13 131
2 114
12:45
7 150
45 549
5 110
17 480
62 1029
01:00
8 131
7 128
01:15
11 147
5 105
01:30
11 152
2 102
01:45
4 162
34 592
2 116
16 451
50 1043
02:00
8 149
1 116
02:15
4 177
3 123
02:30
5 182
3 108
02:45
4 159
21 667
3 114
10 461
31 1128
03:00
7 173
5 119
03:15
3 175
0 141
03:30
2 212
9 126
03:45
3 216
15 776
9 136
23 522
38 1298
04:00
6 207
7 116
04:15
9 174
15 108
04:30
10 189
25 115
04:45
13 187
38 757
23 112
70 451
108
1208
05:00
7 219
25 114
05:15
10 221
43 115
05:30
8 227
38 116
05:45
16 206
41 873
72 103
178
448
219
1321
06:00
14 199
61 112
06:15
18 168
67 106
06:30
17 142
78 88
06:45
24 149
73 658
112
84 318
390
391
1048
07:00
35 164
94 92
07:15
43 113
92 85
07:30
57 89
163
75 07:45
113
94 248
460
155
69 504
321
752
781
08:00
81 74
118
56 08:15
96 88
142
62 08:30
92 83
166
51 08:45
94 82
363
327
171
36 597
205
960
532
09:00
79 83
91 39
09:15
85 57
119
36 09:30
73 53
102
39 09:45
85 50
322
243
106
27 418
141
740
384
10:00
91 58
106
30 10:15
116
34 106
24 10:30
108
31 98
16 10:45
102
16 417
139
92 18
402
88 819
227
11:00
121
27 123
22 11:15
105
18 129
11 11:30
117
19 133
12 11:45
154
9 497
731
120
10 505
55 1002
128
Total
2114
6114
3058
4013
5172
10127
Percent

25.7%

74.3%

43.2%

56.8%

33.8%

66.2%
Grand
2114
6114
3058
4013
5172
10127
Total
Percent

25.7%

74.3%

43.2%

56.8%

33.8%

66.2%
ADT ADT 15,299 AADT 15,299

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Harveston Way & Winchester Road
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
13 158
12 192
12:15
13 172
16 226
12:30
16 154
9 193
12:45
7 177
49 661
11 190
48 801
97 1462
01:00
5 180
8 198
01:15
11 187
12 170
01:30
11 183
7 172
01:45
4 187
31 737
3 179
30 719
61 1456
02:00
12 166
2 179
02:15
3 205
13 200
02:30
6 211
7 203
02:45
5 244
26 826
6 178
28 760
54 1586
03:00
7 207
9 180
03:15
3 200
5 263
03:30
2 273
17 234
03:45
4 276
16 956
25 228
56 905
72 1861
04:00
6 249
20 234
04:15
10 231
32 238
04:30
16 242
71 248
04:45
14 224
46 946
63 255
186
975
232
1921
05:00
7 260
54 292
05:15
13 250
87 286
05:30
10 258
99 290
05:45
19 241
49 1009
161
220
401
1088
450
2097
06:00
18 230
156
239
06:15
24 226
175
148
06:30
23 188
178
145
06:45
36 183
101
827
240
149
749
681
850
1508
07:00
41 164
224
119
07:15
55 171
203
120
07:30
84 148
377
109
07:45
130
131
310
614
404
93 1208
441
1518
1055
08:00
129
135
299
88 08:15
152
127
369
77 08:30
121
131
391
64 08:45
116
102
518
495
385
64 1444
293
1962
788
09:00
95 104
234
44 09:15
118
84 244
69 09:30
101
66 223
44 09:45
105
70 419
324
218
35 919
192
1338
516
10:00
113
60 225
24 10:15
107
48 194
36 10:30
127
49 184
26 10:45
116
30 463
187
162
17 765
103
1228
290
11:00
141
31 197
16 11:15
130
29 200
8 11:30
140
22 183
9 11:45
181
21 592
1031
188
13 768
461
1360
149
Total
2620
7685
6602
7004
9222
14689
Percent

25.4%

74.6%

48.5%

51.5%

38.6%

61.4%
Grand
2620
7685
6602
7004
9222
14689
Total
Percent

25.4%

74.6%

48.5%

51.5%

38.6%

61.4%
ADT ADT 23,911 AADT 23,911

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Winchester Road & N. General Kearny Road
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
29 228
10 230
12:15
19 217
8 276
12:30
16 212
19 248
12:45
13 240
77 897
12 251
49 1005
126
1902
01:00
6 234
9 229
01:15
11 229
3 233
01:30
8 237
7 233
01:45
10 249
35 949
7 213
26 908
61 1857
02:00
6 210
2 258
02:15
11 267
6 268
02:30
8 276
2 260
02:45
11 282
36 1035
8 220
18 1006
54 2041
03:00
8 261
8 222
03:15
5 245
3 248
03:30
8 291
15 275
03:45
11 226
32 1023
14 279
40 1024
72 2047
04:00
15 310
15 250
04:15
20 268
38 233
04:30
25 290
44 236
04:45
30 239
90 1107
75 239
172
958
262
2065
05:00
28 249
92 246
05:15
31 227
133
273
05:30
33 255
123
216
05:45
56 228
148
959
158
223
506
958
654
1917
06:00
41 191
142
181
06:15
56 220
193
194
06:30
69 213
182
183
06:45
70 220
236
844
196
193
713
751
949
1595
07:00
69 211
162
161
07:15
110
207
158
168
07:30
156
157
307
139
07:45
277
165
612
740
279
143
906
611
1518
1351
08:00
231
155
164
138
08:15
208
158
245
119
08:30
174
135
227
109
08:45
157
168
770
616
285
101
921
467
1691
1083
09:00
165
131
217
91 09:15
153
142
192
85 09:30
152
116
221
83 09:45
149
80 619
469
243
66 873
325
1492
794
10:00
162
102
205
48 10:15
181
77 203
54 10:30
169
70 208
34 10:45
197
38 709
287
224
40 840
176
1549
463
11:00
200
44 246
25 11:15
175
42 242
26 11:30
182
27 226
23 11:45
219
17 776
1301
264
251
978
99 1754
229
Total
4140
9056
6042
8288
10182
17344
Percent

31.4%

68.6%

42.2%

57.8%

37.0%

63.0%
Grand
4140
9056
6042
8288
10182
17344
Total
Percent

31.4%

68.6%

42.2%

57.8%

37.0%

63.0%
ADT ADT 27,526 AADT 27,526

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
N. General Kearny Road & Overland Drive
Start 6/3/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
22 227
15 234
12:15
13 235
10 281
12:30
14 215
21 261
12:45
16 230
65 907
11 285
57 1061
122
1968
01:00
5 244
12 246
01:15
10 254
8 222
01:30
5 282
9 240
01:45
4 245
24 1025
8 239
37 947
61 1972
02:00
6 228
2 224
02:15
11 272
4 238
02:30
6 274
4 223
02:45
7 296
30 1070
10 223
20 908
50 1978
03:00
5 301
7 247
03:15
6 299
4 227
03:30
7 309
15 223
03:45
10 277
28 1186
11 271
37 968
65 2154
04:00
11 360
18 247
04:15
16 301
36 228
04:30
21 303
41 254
04:45
35 352
83 1316
69 235
164
964
247
2280
05:00
18 369
94 260
05:15
20 378
149
282
05:30
24 379
117
262
05:45
54 304
116
1430
154
202
514
1006
630
2436
06:00
24 281
143
256
06:15
49 201
188
206
06:30
58 157
180
197
06:45
60 101
191
740
177
175
688
834
879
1574
07:00
56 87
127
165
07:15
92 174
130
182
07:30
133
124
190
163
07:45
185
150
466
535
241
195
688
705
1154
1240
08:00
173
129
170
166
08:15
183
123
232
139
08:30
160
111
210
145
08:45
159
99 675
462
223
125
835
575
1510
1037
09:00
162
104
198
121
09:15
158
106
180
110
09:30
152
93 177
95 09:45
178
58 650
361
214
75 769
401
1419
762
10:00
184
69 182
59 10:15
182
57 209
68 10:30
202
46 188
35 10:45
211
35 779
207
218
39 797
201
1576
408
11:00
215
28 209
30 11:15
203
30 216
28 11:30
237
19 239
31 11:45
253
11 908
881
227
21 891
110
1799
198
Total
4015
9327
5497
8680
9512
18007
Percent

30.1 %

69.9%

38.8%

61.2%

34.6%

65.4%
Grand
4015
9327
5497
8680
9512
18007
Total
Percent

30.1 %

69.9%

38.8%

61.2%

34.6%

65.4%
ADT ADT 27,519 AADT 27,519

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Overland Drive & Solana Way
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
11 200
19 248
12:15
7 197
8 286
12:30
9 190
19 313
12:45
9 191
36 778
13 294
59 1141
95 1919
01:00
4 185
12 273
01:15
5 198
12 242
01:30
4 212
6 277
01:45
4 221
17 816
12 267
42 1059
59 1875
02:00
4 183
4 274
02:15
5 199
2 276
02:30
5 197
4 251
02:45
10 226
24 805
5 284
15 1085
39 1890
03:00
5 217
9 279
03:15
5 267
2 268
03:30
7 253
10 296
03:45
13 213
30 950
4 304
25 1147
55 2097
04:00
12 253
11 298
04:15
12 256
17 289
04:30
17 226
22 319
04:45
36 255
77 990
33 303
83 1209
160
2199
05:00
19 246
69 315
05:15
36 250
118
352
05:30
32 235
89 345
05:45
72 237
159
968
101
251
377
1263
536
2231
06:00
47 215
99 278
06:15
57 179
140
228
06:30
69 193
141
235
06:45
96 155
269
742
135
181
515
922
784
1664
07:00
70 151
119
213
07:15
93 146
119
212
07:30
117
125
160
154
07:45
169
110
449
532
179
185
577
764
1026
1296
08:00
168
107
154
199
08:15
156
99 178
179
08:30
169
69 181
157
08:45
179
82 672
357
187
141
700
676
1372
1033
09:00
156
62 170
146
09:15
152
52 158
103
09:30
187
64 143
115
09:45
214
34 709
212
154
109
625
473
1334
685
10:00
164
39 182
81 10:15
195
33 194
67 10:30
221
25 194
66 10:45
204
25 784
122
209
47 779
261
1563
383
11:00
201
16 220
38 11:15
193
15 237
25 11:30
196
16 268
28 11:45
251
71 841
541
230
371
955
128
1796
182
Total
4067
7326
4752
10128
8819
17454
Percent

35.7%

64.3%

31.9%

68.1%

33.6%

66.4%
Grand
4067
7326
4752
10128
8819
17454
Total
Percent

35.7%

64.3%

31.9%

68.1%

33.6%

66.4%
ADT ADT 26,273 AADT 26,273

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Solana Way & Moraga Road
Start 6/3/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
18 241
24 231
12:15
14 267
10 216
12:30
14 267
11 203
12:45
8 272
54 1047
12 208
57 858
111
1905
01:00
7 247
4 211
01:15
10 240
9 250
01:30
6 220
5 223
01:45
9 246
32 953
4 223
22 907
54 1860
02:00
7 261
3 199
02:15
5 257
2 221
02:30
6 230
7 243
02:45
9 258
27 1006
7 244
19 907
46 1913
03:00
9 259
5 235
03:15
3 280
6 296
03:30
10 260
10 316
03:45
13 233
35 1032
13 291
34 1138
69 2170
04:00
12 263
18 267
04:15
11 257
15 278
04:30
20 267
21 264
04:45
28 280
71 1067
39 304
93 1113
164
2180
05:00
44 290
20 265
05:15
53 317
27 280
05:30
47 328
39 256
05:45
63 271
207
1206
67 286
153
1087
360
2293
06:00
50 251
45 231
06:15
93 217
48 178
06:30
93 219
64 195
06:45
111
181
347
868
93 169
250
773
597
1641
07:00
100
179
73 165
07:15
129
186
98 152
07:30
139
138
124
118
07:45
137
159
505
662
192
118
487
553
992
1215
08:00
120
158
191
88 08:15
146
154
165
108
08:30
145
136
236
72 08:45
162
123
573
571
222
72 814
340
1387
911
09:00
141
114
206
65 09:15
112
87 161
51 09:30
129
98 204
57 09:45
145
87 527
386
199
32 770
205
1297
591
10:00
165
74 188
57 10:15
157
46 242
34 10:30
175
61 227
23 10:45
192
34 689
215
223
32 880
146
1569
361
11:00
182
41 186
19 11:15
222
25 229
20 11:30
220
20 218
20 11:45
186
241
810
1101
250
11 1 883
70 1693
180
Total
3877
9123
4462
8097
8339
17220
Percent

29.8%

70.2%

35.5%

64.5%

32.6%

67.4%
Grand
3877
9123
4462
8097
8339
17220
Total
Percent

29.8%

70.2%

35.5%

64.5%

32.6%

67.4%
ADT ADT 25,559 AADT 25,559

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Moraga Road & Avenida Barca
Start 6/3/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
10 177
18 195
12:15
7 172
8 210
12:30
10 184
11 186
12:45
6 183
33 716
5 186
42 777
75 1493
01:00
6 182
2 189
01:15
3 188
8 225
01:30
4 151
5 233
01:45
3 181
16 702
3 171
18 818
34 1520
02:00
5 185
5 194
02:15
2 185
4 200
02:30
4 176
6 255
02:45
3 178
14 724
3 255
18 904
32 1628
03:00
8 177
4 220
03:15
2 181
8 264
03:30
5 193
12 307
03:45
3 174
18 725
10 292
34 1083
52 1808
04:00
5 205
13 228
04:15
1 190
17 235
04:30
9 187
22 251
04:45
13 213
28 795
34 248
86 962
114
1757
05:00
22 205
23 237
05:15
31 222
32 241
05:30
27 218
43 231
05:45
39 190
119
835
62 235
160
944
279
1779
06:00
28 183
45 197
06:15
59 173
46 157
06:30
53 160
61 156
06:45
83 120
223
636
78 152
230
662
453
1298
07:00
66 129
74 148
07:15
103
136
97 135
07:30
109
107
142
105
07:45
111
107
389
479
232
100
545
488
934
967
08:00
86 118
185
75 08:15
82 117
164
98 08:30
86 102
193
62 08:45
128
84 382
421
170
63 712
298
1094
719
09:00
92 74
182
59 09:15
80 60
150
42 09:30
99 54
186
43 09:45
100
57 371
245
170
33 688
177
1059
422
10:00
104
48 187
41 10:15
123
42 204
22 10:30
140
37 228
22 10:45
120
24 487
151
204
24 823
109
1310
260
11:00
147
25 175
15 11:15
162
12 226
13 11:30
149
14 201
12 11:45
135
13 593
641
246
10 848
50 1441
114
Total
2673
6493
4204
7272
6877
13765
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

36.6%

63.4%

33.3%

66.7%
Grand
2673
6493
4204
7272
6877
13765
Total
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

36.6%

63.4%

33.3%

66.7%
ADT ADT 20,642 AADT 20,642

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOLINTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Avenida Barca & La Serena Way
Start 6/3/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
11 179
15 177
12:15
3 198
9 205
12:30
13 235
11 185
12:45
7 206
34 818
5 178
40 745
74 1563
01:00
4 208
4 174
01:15
3 195
8 227
01:30
1 164
4 216
01:45
5 198
13 765
5 167
21 784
34 1549
02:00
4 201
6 192
02:15
2 209
2 188
02:30
3 281
4 318
02:45
3 272
12 963
3 238
15 936
27 1899
03:00
9 205
0 180
03:15
2 228
6 242
03:30
5 222
12 312
03:45
4 182
20 837
8 282
26 1016
46 1853
04:00
5 231
11 213
04:15
2 204
10 222
04:30
11 191
19 241
04:45
16 220
34 846
30 247
70 923
104
1769
05:00
23 199
15 245
05:15
30 248
24 231
05:30
34 232
31 228
05:45
42 186
129
865
57 226
127
930
256
1795
06:00
35 194
37 177
06:15
65 163
45 171
06:30
73 159
51 150
06:45
83 135
256
651
64 147
197
645
453
1296
07:00
76 133
63 151
07:15
108
133
84 156
07:30
169
107
147
145
07:45
236
101
589
474
289
124
583
576
1172
1050
08:00
170
118
153
81 08:15
111
123
153
96 08:30
109
103
183
63 08:45
141
83 531
427
171
83 660
323
1191
750
09:00
106
80 172
62 09:15
84 69
141
46 09:30
107
53 184
47 09:45
116
60 413
262
174
33 671
188
1084
450
10:00
107
44 174
46 10:15
149
41 172
14 10:30
147
34 204
40 10:45
143
25 546
144
193
21 743
121
1289
265
11:00
137
26 178
18 11:15
165
13 204
20 11:30
186
16 180
14 11:45
162
141
650
691
247
15 809
671
1459
136
Total
3227
7121
3962
7254
7189
14375
Percent

31.2%

68.8%

35.3%

64.7%

33.3%

66.7%
Grand
3227
7121
3962
7254
7189
14375
Total
Percent

31.2%

68.8%

35.3%

64.7%

33.3%

66.7%
ADT ADT21,564 AADT21,564

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOLINTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
La Serena Way & Rancho Californiia Road
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
21 208
11 210
12:15
13 189
7 206
12:30
12 191
10 267
12:45
11 174
57 762
10 237
38 920
95 1682
01:00
6 185
4 212
01:15
7 207
2 223
01:30
6 224
2 178
01:45
4 207
23 823
6 205
14 818
37 1641
02:00
7 204
7 219
02:15
3 213
1 222
02:30
3 244
3 247
02:45
4 244
17 905
8 346
19 1034
36 1939
03:00
1 236
11 235
03:15
3 287
4 282
03:30
5 324
10 298
03:45
2 354
11 1201
10 262
35 1077
46 2278
04:00
7 245
13 265
04:15
5 255
21 267
04:30
9 278
34 251
04:45
14 287
35 1065
31 342
99 1125
134
2190
05:00
16 299
47 232
05:15
11 283
57 313
05:30
33 264
61 311
05:45
44 235
104
1081
84 241
249
1097
353
2178
06:00
27 218
60 242
06:15
24 194
127
192
06:30
44 166
98 172
06:45
54 177
149
755
127
159
412
765
561
1520
07:00
54 152
115
148
07:15
93 121
152
126
07:30
137
129
171
131
07:45
194
91 478
493
244
113
682
518
1160
1011
08:00
127
108
278
110
08:15
166
89 230
127
08:30
169
86 159
115
08:45
189
63 651
346
182
101
849
453
1500
799
09:00
165
67 145
91 09:15
151
58 143
87 09:30
176
41 163
57 09:45
180
35 672
201
178
60 629
295
1301
496
10:00
170
54 160
63 10:15
174
33 184
43 10:30
187
23 182
37 10:45
187
19 718
129
197
27 723
170
1441
299
11:00
190
24 219
24 11:15
200
13 205
17 11:30
204
17 210
20 11:45
199
19 793
731
202
221
836
83 1629
156
Total
3708
7834
4585
8355
8293
16189
Percent

32.1 %

67.9%

35.4%

64.6%

33.9%

66.1 %
Grand
3708
7834
4585
8355
8293
16189
Total
Percent

32.1%

67.9%

35.4%

64.6%

33.9%

66.1%
ADT ADT 24,482 AADT 24,482

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Rancho Californiia Rd & Rancho Vista Rd
Start 6/3/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
35 293
14 167
12:15
17 292
5 186
12:30
17 255
12 193
12:45
11 260
80 1100
10 178
41 724
121
1824
01:00
12 334
8 195
01:15
10 300
6 189
01:30
12 272
4 148
01:45
7 284
41 1190
13 189
31 721
72 1911
02:00
8 286
8 164
02:15
14 266
2 185
02:30
7 361
3 191
02:45
11 328
40 1241
4 244
17 784
57 2025
03:00
7 361
11 227
03:15
3 450
9 228
03:30
14 584
11 311
03:45
9 610
33 2005
9 271
40 1037
73 3042
04:00
9 400
7 263
04:15
6 368
15 320
04:30
16 466
29 299
04:45
24 418
55 1652
26 327
77 1209
132
2861
05:00
15 447
49 308
05:15
36 402
55 318
05:30
44 413
73 317
05:45
42 393
137
1655
93 278
270
1221
407
2876
06:00
24 307
85 251
06:15
40 294
152
228
06:30
52 273
114
201
06:45
65 233
181
1107
151
157
502
837
683
1944
07:00
83 253
153
180
07:15
127
188
205
178
07:30
151
175
243
152
07:45
227
224
588
840
298
120
899
630
1487
1470
08:00
239
145
389
121
08:15
315
165
392
154
08:30
293
105
204
125
08:45
287
109
1134
524
287
98 1272
498
2406
1022
09:00
200
137
182
77 09:15
248
103
223
103
09:30
249
97 229
83 09:45
236
76 933
413
234
67 868
330
1801
743
10:00
284
71 215
78 10:15
228
39 217
59 10:30
267
36 185
34 10:45
287
50 1066
196
190
31 807
202
1873
398
11:00
329
43 206
36 11:15
292
34 221
25 11:30
308
25 200
25 11:45
289
43 1218
1451
185
271
812
113
2030
258
Total
5506
12068
5636
8306
11142
20374
Percent

31.3%

68.7%

40.4%

59.6%

35.4%

64.6%
Grand
5506
12068
5636
8306
11142
20374
Total
Percent

31.3%

68.7%

40.4%

59.6%

35.4%

64.6%
ADT ADT 31,516 AADT 31,516

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Rancho Vista Road & Pauba Road
Start 6/3/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
22 267
12 216
12:15
16 258
3 249
12:30
13 244
9 269
12:45
11 242
62 1011
8 249
32 983
94 1994
01:00
13 269
7 284
01:15
8 310
4 242
01:30
10 281
4 253
01:45
6 297
37 1157
13 254
28 1033
65 2190
02:00
7 303
7 217
02:15
13 294
6 258
02:30
9 312
4 284
02:45
8 336
37 1245
3 309
20 1068
57 2313
03:00
6 392
6 292
03:15
6 450
10 236
03:30
14 505
14 441
03:45
9 354
35 1701
9 384
39 1353
74 3054
04:00
9 361
6 260
04:15
12 409
12 297
04:30
7 410
19 247
04:45
22 407
50 1587
27 247
64 1051
114
2638
05:00
17 480
33 297
05:15
40 364
42 289
05:30
36 314
57 345
05:45
37 374
130
1532
82 301
214
1232
344
2764
06:00
25 273
69 246
06:15
39 281
120
202
06:30
64 219
101
199
06:45
53 223
181
996
124
221
414
868
595
1864
07:00
79 206
115
183
07:15
139
186
154
207
07:30
141
183
173
186
07:45
246
213
605
788
215
150
657
726
1262
1514
08:00
313
128
251
193
08:15
346
149
270
150
08:30
231
96 215
157
08:45
240
85 1130
458
255
124
991
624
2121
1082
09:00
220
115
162
107
09:15
194
96 200
120
09:30
215
93 191
84 09:45
191
76 820
380
182
86 735
397
1555
777
10:00
221
51 200
75 10:15
227
36 195
50 10:30
264
35 191
36 10:45
256
48 968
170
217
48 803
209
1771
379
11:00
257
38 235
27 11:15
259
33 263
11 11:30
312
26 258
26 11:45
276
301
1104
1271
250
271
1006
91 1 2110
218
Total
5159
11152
5003
9635
10162
20787
Percent

31.6%

68.4%

34.2%

65.8%

32.8%

67.2%
Grand
5159
11152
5003
9635
10162
20787
Total
Percent

31.6%

68.4%

34.2%

65.8%

32.8%

67.2%
ADT ADT 30,949 AADT 30,949

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Pauba Road & Santiago Road
Start 6/3/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
20 293
16 284
12:15
20 262
9 293
12:30
10 242
10 313
12:45
13 233
63 1030
14 328
49 1218
112
2248
01:00
14 267
7 364
01:15
6 283
9 331
01:30
9 277
2 301
01:45
8 281
37 1108
16 281
34 1277
71 2385
02:00
6 299
6 278
02:15
11 273
6 295
02:30
8 291
4 312
02:45
6 306
31 1169
4 391
20 1276
51 2445
03:00
5 352
10 343
03:15
3 352
10 294
03:30
10 346
16 437
03:45
13 329
31 1379
8 440
44 1514
75 2893
04:00
16 360
8 346
04:15
8 389
18 357
04:30
14 338
24 329
04:45
25 357
63 1444
42 357
92 1389
155
2833
05:00
31 396
57 371
05:15
43 299
63 353
05:30
55 292
101
366
05:45
40 359
169
1346
132
377
353
1467
522
2813
06:00
41 285
116
284
06:15
54 310
169
252
06:30
80 263
150
234
06:45
68 247
243
1105
192
198
627
968
870
2073
07:00
94 229
186
203
07:15
153
173
209
253
07:30
154
134
223
176
07:45
241
134
642
670
265
130
883
762
1525
1432
08:00
299
103
244
139
08:15
279
92 336
149
08:30
240
95 263
146
08:45
250
58 1068
348
313
165
1156
599
2224
947
09:00
251
93 213
120
09:15
204
71 254
140
09:30
229
42 201
103
09:45
228
35 912
241
267
69 935
432
1847
673
10:00
254
76 271
66 10:15
231
46 253
73 10:30
269
22 247
41 10:45
249
25 1003
169
274
39 1045
219
2048
388
11:00
270
33 301
39 11:15
234
24 270
24 11:30
304
20 292
25 11:45
246
131
1054
901
290
321
1153
1201
2207
210
Total
5316
10099
6391
11241
11707
21340
Percent

34.5%

65.5%

36.2%

63.8%

35.4%

64.6%
Grand
5316
10099
6391
11241
11707
21340
Total
Percent

34.5%

65.5%

36.2%

63.8%

35.4%

64.6%
ADT ADT 33,047 AADT 33,047

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Santiago Road & Pio Pico Road
Start 6/3/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
20 239
9 246
12:15
24 216
6 214
12:30
14 215
7 211
12:45
14 235
72 905
10 237
32 908
104
1813
01:00
13 224
6 263
01:15
9 253
6 234
01:30
8 248
1 192
01:45
11 237
41 962
13 218
26 907
67 1869
02:00
11 250
5 211
02:15
10 245
4 202
02:30
9 238
6 229
02:45
7 286
37 1019
1 236
16 878
53 1897
03:00
6 346
11 292
03:15
6 308
8 205
03:30
12 322
11 310
03:45
7 291
31 1267
14 315
44 1122
75 2389
04:00
7 336
10 271
04:15
6 374
15 227
04:30
11 313
28 247
04:45
24 356
48 1379
45 252
98 997
146
2376
05:00
18 357
62 233
05:15
28 343
72 276
05:30
42 324
102
235
05:45
21 367
109
1391
134
256
370
1000
479
2391
06:00
38 346
114
178
06:15
35 359
127
193
06:30
58 321
148
146
06:45
56 255
187
1281
163
121
552
638
739
1919
07:00
89 164
137
109
07:15
102
159
154
178
07:30
129
163
187
115
07:45
167
178
487
664
210
81 688
483
1175
1147
08:00
206
132
220
82 08:15
176
140
217
101
08:30
205
95 221
87 08:45
190
79 777
446
236
101
894
371
1671
817
09:00
179
125
179
84 09:15
175
92 179
99 09:30
167
90 187
66 09:45
160
76 681
383
197
47 742
296
1423
679
10:00
199
56 206
37 10:15
206
38 185
44 10:30
203
41 192
23 10:45
212
63 820
198
195
27 778
131
1598
329
11:00
209
47 203
21 11:15
195
48 228
14 11:30
261
31 210
15 11:45
207
34 872
1601
209
241
850
741
1722
234
Total
4162
10055
5090
7805
9252
17860
Percent

29.3%

70.7%

39.5%

60.5%

34.1%

65.9%
Grand
4162
10055
5090
7805
9252
17860
Total
Percent

29.3%

70.7%

39.5%

60.5%

34.1%

65.9%
ADT ADT 27,112 AADT 27,112

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
Pio Pico Road & De Portola Road
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
11 247
11 243
12:15
19 188
6 248
12:30
9 227
11 254
12:45
9 189
48 851
8 258
36 1003
84 1854
01:00
8 233
7 240
01:15
7 239
7 244
01:30
9 239
2 231
01:45
5 240
29 951
12 214
28 929
57 1880
02:00
7 245
6 246
02:15
11 224
6 238
02:30
10 256
3 253
02:45
4 270
32 995
3 269
18 1006
50 2001
03:00
4 311
8 291
03:15
5 322
7 278
03:30
8 264
12 328
03:45
6 291
23 1188
13 329
40 1226
63 2414
04:00
6 370
10 287
04:15
5 321
13 265
04:30
9 321
18 280
04:45
18 297
38 1309
39 292
80 1124
118
2433
05:00
22 364
24 253
05:15
17 292
42 312
05:30
29 281
59 261
05:45
13 342
81 1279
91 282
216
1108
297
2387
06:00
23 271
73 181
06:15
29 308
105
178
06:30
43 225
119
125
06:45
39 213
134
1017
123
101
420
585
554
1602
07:00
81 194
139
111
07:15
95 141
146
160
07:30
111
108
196
123
07:45
149
112
436
555
177
103
658
497
1094
1052
08:00
168
107
218
101
08:15
153
103
231
117
08:30
162
75 225
95 08:45
177
74 660
359
239
113
913
426
1573
785
09:00
149
80 181
85 09:15
156
57 192
86 09:30
149
33 186
62 09:45
136
50 590
220
195
41 754
274
1344
494
10:00
181
60 219
29 10:15
167
35 206
42 10:30
198
22 201
24 10:45
187
23 733
140
222
22 848
117
1581
257
11:00
192
40 231
16 11:15
170
14 261
14 11:30
266
18 237
17 11:45
193
141
821
861
256
221
985
69 1806
155
Total
3625
8950
4996
8364
8621
17314
Percent

28.8%

71.2%

37.4%

62.6%

33.2%

66.8%
Grand
3625
8950
4996
8364
8621
17314
Total
Percent

28.8%

71.2%

37.4%

62.6%

33.2%

66.8%
ADT ADT 25,935 AADT 25,935

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Margarita Road Btwn
De Portola Road & Temecula Parkway
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
19 295
20 345
12:15
21 239
9 318
12:30
15 301
12 319
12:45
14 265
69 1100
6 328
47 1310
116
2410
01:00
12 302
5 323
01:15
18 294
9 305
01:30
13 299
2 273
01:45
11 312
54 1207
12 262
28 1163
82 2370
02:00
8 284
2 321
02:15
12 269
6 326
02:30
15 323
6 306
02:45
4 345
39 1221
8 324
22 1277
61 2498
03:00
9 314
9 417
03:15
5 353
11 323
03:30
12 320
14 379
03:45
7 378
33 1365
14 350
48 1469
81 2834
04:00
7 391
16 343
04:15
6 386
20 303
04:30
12 365
24 363
04:45
23 367
48 1509
42 339
102
1348
150
2857
05:00
20 357
25 340
05:15
23 351
42 366
05:30
30 375
59 326
05:45
19 385
92 1468
88 324
214
1356
306
2824
06:00
39 310
71 250
06:15
43 287
103
216
06:30
74 256
130
186
06:45
65 198
221
1051
114
153
418
805
639
1856
07:00
99 183
140
150
07:15
138
173
160
193
07:30
175
152
217
168
07:45
250
144
662
652
215
125
732
636
1394
1288
08:00
218
137
283
129
08:15
233
130
228
123
08:30
233
93 245
116
08:45
263
98 947
458
268
110
1024
478
1971
936
09:00
185
91 220
126
09:15
200
77 211
118
09:30
191
47 241
84 09:45
181
67 757
282
222
79 894
407
1651
689
10:00
268
59 257
70 10:15
232
40 250
66 10:30
242
41 250
38 10:45
246
36 988
176
274
21 1031
195
2019
371
11:00
256
48 279
22 11:15
229
25 266
22 11:30
346
23 288
17 11:45
265
271
1096
123
1 293
32 1126
93 2222
216
Total
5006
10612
5686
10537
10692
21149
Percent

32.1 %

67.9%

35.0%

65.0%

33.6%

66.4%
Grand
5006
10612
5686
10537
10692
21149
Total
Percent

32.1 %

67.9%

35.0%

65.0%

33.6%

66.4%
ADT ADT 31,841 AADT 31,841

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOLINTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Meadows Parkway Btwn
La Serena Way & Royal Oaks Drive
Start 5/28/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
2 49
1 48
12:15
4 58
0 48
12:30
0 48
1 58
12:45
2 47
8 202
2 50
4 204
12 406
01:00
1 63
1 41
01:15
2 48
1 37
01:30
0 69
1 55
01:45
0 47
3 227
0 54
3 187
6 414
02:00
0 69
1 41
02:15
0 41
3 55
02:30
0 73
2 81
02:45
4 64
4 247
1 82
7 259
11 506
03:00
0 66
1 74
03:15
0 96
2 91
03:30
1 96
2 76
03:45
0 102
1 360
1 56
6 297
7 657
04:00
3 74
2 51
04:15
0 66
5 47
04:30
2 88
3 44
04:45
2 62
7 290
2 45
12 187
19 477
05:00
3 62
1 49
05:15
1 59
7 51
05:30
3 62
4 56
05:45
6 80
13 263
8 38
20 194
33 457
06:00
10 60
2 60
06:15
3 48
17 30
06:30
15 47
17 27
06:45
13 42
41 197
27 29
63 146
104
343
07:00
15 24
35 21
07:15
25 28
42 33
07:30
37 24
64 24
07:45
39 17
116
93 102
16 243
94 359
187
08:00
49 35
97 21
08:15
55 36
83 23
08:30
56 24
67 11
08:45
46 20
206
115
81 25
328
80 534
195
09:00
26 28
50 10
09:15
36 23
42 10
09:30
32 18
38 22
09:45
29 12
123
81 45
10 175
52 298
133
10:00
47 18
42 7
10:15
27 10
43 9
10:30
41 6
41 11
10:45
41 5
156
39 49
1 175
28 331
67 11:00
50 3
39 4
11:15
48 7
49 3
11:30
66 3
47 4
11:45
36 3
200
16 52
3 187
141
387
30 Total
878
2130
1223
1742
2101
3872
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

41.2%

58.8%

35.2%

64.8%
Grand
878
2130
1223
1742
2101
3872
Total
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

41.2%

58.8%

35.2%

64.8%
ADT ADT 5,973 AADT 5,973

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Meadows Parkway Btwn
Royal Oaks Drive & Rancho California Rd
Start 5/28/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
3 51
1 43
12:15
4 57
1 34
12:30
1 45
0 40
12:45
2 41
10 194
1 40
3 157
13 351
01:00
1 55
1 34
01:15
3 40
2 33
01:30
3 53
1 39
01:45
1 48
8 196
0 45
4 151
12 347
02:00
3 54
1 32
02:15
0 38
3 51
02:30
1 84
1 56
02:45
1 64
5 240
3 58
8 197
13 437
03:00
1 62
1 66
03:15
1 101
2 70
03:30
2 113
2 64
03:45
0 96
4 372
1 55
6 255
10 627
04:00
1 77
4 47
04:15
0 66
7 44
04:30
2 89
8 46
04:45
1 69
4 301
9 47
28 184
32 485
05:00
3 58
3 40
05:15
2 77
11 39
05:30
1 65
8 51
05:45
6 82
12 282
11 39
33 169
45 451
06:00
7 60
11 43
06:15
4 56
26 27
06:30
11 51
24 26
06:45
10 52
32 219
30 27
91 123
123
342
07:00
14 38
34 21
07:15
20 31
34 28
07:30
21 32
64 23
07:45
38 24
93 125
83 17
215
89 308
214
08:00
50 47
95 18
08:15
65 41
77 25
08:30
55 36
68 9
08:45
42 29
212
153
74 16
314
68 526
221
09:00
30 29
41 13
09:15
32 20
44 9
09:30
34 15
41 15
09:45
35 14
131
78 41
10 167
47 298
125
10:00
39 17
32 6
10:15
29 5
37 5
10:30
34 7
29 9
10:45
39 7
141
36 34
1 132
21 273
57 11:00
47 3
38 4
11:15
49 5
41 3
11:30
42 2
30 3
11:45
40 7
178
171
43 1
152
11 330
28 Total
830
2213
1153
1472
1983
3685
Percent

27.3%

72.7%

43.9%

56.1 %

35.0%

65.0%
Grand
830
2213
1153
1472
1983
3685
Total
Percent

27.3%

72.7%

43.9%

56.1%

35.0%

65.0%
ADT ADT 5,668 AADT 5,668

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Meadows Parkway Btwn
Rancho California Road & Rancho Vista Rd
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
5 84
4 105
12:15
3 110
4 96
12:30
4 98
1 84
12:45
4 116
16 408
2 99
11 384
27 792
01:00
3 90
3 118
01:15
2 93
1 103
01:30
3 103
3 100
01:45
0 97
8 383
2 90
9 411
17 794
02:00
2 90
3 86
02:15
3 138
2 100
02:30
1 134
1 176
02:45
3 135
9 497
3 121
9 483
18 980
03:00
1 161
5 111
03:15
4 146
5 204
03:30
1 119
6 236
03:45
5 116
11 542
2 197
18 748
29 1290
04:00
3 103
3 144
04:15
3 113
8 143
04:30
4 138
6 149
04:45
6 119
16 473
14 134
31 570
47 1043
05:00
5 107
8 111
05:15
12 121
14 127
05:30
21 126
8 126
05:45
22 107
60 461
22 100
52 464
112
925
06:00
14 101
19 89
06:15
38 66
32 91
06:30
26 95
33 78
06:45
42 62
120
324
42 78
126
336
246
660
07:00
43 51
37 73
07:15
74 64
70 57
07:30
129
55 76
78 07:45
158
60 404
230
102
58 285
266
689
496
08:00
157
54 131
76 08:15
204
51 140
68 08:30
203
41 150
52 08:45
118
59 682
205
162
45 583
241
1265
446
09:00
91 32
81 63
09:15
75 28
88 40
09:30
81 33
83 30
09:45
82 22
329
115
71 21
323
154
652
269
10:00
64 20
79 25
10:15
111
20 90
10 10:30
68 15
87 14
10:45
105
16 348
71 95
10 351
59 699
130
11:00
71 10
106
6 11:15
94 8
74 10
11:30
101
5 87
3 11:45
95 5
361
28 1 95
101
362
29 723
57 Total
2364
3737
2160
4145
4524
7882
Percent

38.7%

61.3%

34.3%

65.7%

36.5%

63.5%
Grand
2364
3737
2160
4145
4524
7882
Total
Percent

38.7%

61.3%

34.3%

65.7%

36.5%

63.5%
ADT ADT 12,406 AADT 12,406

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Meadows Parkway Btwn
Rancho Vista Road & Pauba Road
Start 5/28/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
2 126
7 84
12:15
6 130
3 96
12:30
1 104
4 109
12:45
2 103
11 463
3 88
17 377
28 840
01:00
4 122
3 89
01:15
3 115
1 93
01:30
5 119
3 88
01:45
3 113
15 469
1 95
8 365
23 834
02:00
3 110
2 99
02:15
2 139
3 99
02:30
1 199
1 183
02:45
1 133
7 581
3 138
9 519
16 1100
03:00
5 151
1 115
03:15
4 275
3 140
03:30
3 225
1 167
03:45
1 220
13 871
5 206
10 628
23 1499
04:00
3 158
3 104
04:15
6 197
5 100
04:30
6 189
5 104
04:45
8 170
23 714
5 105
18 413
41 1127
05:00
5 150
8 97
05:15
12 146
13 114
05:30
7 187
21 110
05:45
20 175
44 658
21 91
63 412
107
1070
06:00
17 129
20 97
06:15
27 98
37 72
06:30
29 91
27 84
06:45
40 82
113
400
39 94
123
347
236
747
07:00
46 87
44 68
07:15
66 72
66 69
07:30
98 74
143
60 07:45
156
57 366
290
182
41 435
238
801
528
08:00
179
61 137
38 08:15
134
84 182
40 08:30
126
65 213
61 08:45
168
53 607
263
105
35 637
174
1244
437
09:00
95 77
74 32
09:15
111
47 73
22 09:30
97 34
83 24
09:45
87 22
390
180
76 31
306
109
696
289
10:00
92 26
68 17
10:15
104
10 85
13 10:30
87 20
72 16
10:45
104
11 387
67 96
10 321
56 708
123
11:00
112
15 84
4 11:15
104
10 74
8 11:30
96 3
89 2
11:45
106
7 418
351
95 6
342
201
760
55 Total
2394
4991
2289
3658
4683
8649
Percent

32.4%

67.6%

38.5%

61.5%

35.1 %

64.9%
Grand
2394
4991
2289
3658
4683
8649
Total
Percent

32.4%

67.6%

38.5%

61.5%

35.1 %

64.9%
ADT ADT 13,332 AADT 13,332

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Meadows Parkway Btwn
Pauba Road & De Portola Road
Start 5/28/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
2 90
6 109
12:15
2 108
8 106
12:30
1 85
3 96
12:45
2 104
7 387
6 113
23 424
30 811
01:00
1 81
6 103
01:15
1 115
5 95
01:30
1 81
9 107
01:45
5 114
8 391
5 104
25 409
33 800
02:00
3 72
3 112
02:15
3 99
1 150
02:30
3 174
3 140
02:45
5 123
14 468
0 126
7 528
21 996
03:00
3 103
3 127
03:15
3 121
1 196
03:30
5 158
4 149
03:45
14 162
25 544
2 162
10 634
35 1178
04:00
9 112
2 178
04:15
10 97
3 156
04:30
21 124
3 156
04:45
29 124
69 457
9 158
17 648
86 1105
05:00
24 96
1 166
05:15
30 105
6 147
05:30
48 107
7 148
05:45
63 97
165
405
10 120
24 581
189
986
06:00
41 94
10 151
06:15
54 76
27 107
06:30
52 74
19 151
06:45
61 65
208
309
29 101
85 510
293
819
07:00
63 61
30 102
07:15
73 65
47 97
07:30
104
61 87
93 07:45
165
72 405
259
103
71 267
363
672
622
08:00
140
61 72
86 08:15
132
60 72
105
08:30
136
36 81
86 08:45
147
54 555
211
84 75
309
352
864
563
09:00
92 75
94 71
09:15
86 24
58 37
09:30
105
32 61
53 09:45
109
18 392
149
75 35
288
196
680
345
10:00
85 17
80 27
10:15
88 24
77 28
10:30
85 11
66 35
10:45
112
10 370
62 69
23 292
113
662
175
11:00
87 11
80 25
11:15
98 10
104
13 11:30
95 6
90 13
11:45
103
2 383
29 94
6 368
571
751
86 Total
2601
3671
1715
4815
4316
8486
Percent

41.5%

58.5%

26.3%

73.7%

33.7%

66.3%
Grand
2601
3671
1715
4815
4316
8486
Total
Percent

41.5%

58.5%

26.3%

73.7%

33.7%

66.3%
ADT ADT 12,802 AADT 12,802

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Meadows Parkway Btwn
De Portola Road & Temecula Parkway
Start 5/28/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
4 102
3 91
12:15
9 84
2 95
12:30
5 101
3 89
12:45
3 99
21 386
4 114
12 389
33 775
01:00
8 95
1 101
01:15
6 85
2 114
01:30
7 96
2 77
01:45
4 98
25 374
6 96
11 388
36 762
02:00
2 112
3 82
02:15
0 108
1 95
02:30
4 118
3 118
02:45
2 109
8 447
4 110
11 405
19 852
03:00
3 105
3 97
03:15
0 163
3 100
03:30
3 125
6 131
03:45
2 138
8 531
15 129
27 457
35 988
04:00
4 151
7 101
04:15
1 137
11 97
04:30
2 133
14 111
04:45
7 119
14 540
24 130
56 439
70 979
05:00
3 154
13 109
05:15
5 121
23 87
05:30
10 126
27 95
05:45
3 106
21 507
43 101
106
392
127
899
06:00
10 133
29 95
06:15
16 121
25 76
06:30
16 123
41 74
06:45
24 93
66 470
53 87
148
332
214
802
07:00
36 97
57 65
07:15
42 108
59 67
07:30
52 91
60 70
07:45
57 71
187
367
102
69 278
271
465
638
08:00
55 82
88 54
08:15
72 88
93 64
08:30
49 87
104
38 08:45
66 47
242
304
117
39 402
195
644
499
09:00
77 57
67 53
09:15
59 34
76 29
09:30
73 43
90 38
09:45
75 34
284
168
95 13
328
133
612
301
10:00
77 25
74 18
10:15
73 19
86 24
10:30
60 30
84 10
10:45
81 20
291
94 108
12 352
64 643
158
11:00
75 27
72 8
11:15
96 11
96 9
11:30
76 12
88 4
11:45
90 6
337
561
95 41
351
25 688
81 Total
1504
4244
2082
3490
3586
7734
Percent

26.2%

73.8%

37.4%

62.6%

31.7%

68.3%
Grand
1504
4244
2082
3490
3586
7734
Total
Percent

26.2%

73.8%

37.4%

62.6%

31.7%

68.3%
ADT ADT 11,320 AADT 11,320

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
West City Limit & Diaz Road
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
0 63
6 79
12:15
3 56
2 80
12:30
0 66
3 59
12:45
0 60
3 245
5 67
16 285
19 530
01:00
2 68
4 96
01:15
0 52
3 75
01:30
1 75
3 72
01:45
1 51
4 246
3 83
13 326
17 572
02:00
1 55
2 85
02:15
1 72
1 96
02:30
0 50
0 67
02:45
1 70
3 247
0 90
3 338
6 585
03:00
0 85
2 76
03:15
1 73
0 85
03:30
2 75
2 77
03:45
4 69
7 302
6 61
10 299
17 601
04:00
4 60
5 86
04:15
0 64
6 74
04:30
7 56
2 81
04:45
8 40
19 220
2 91
15 332
34 552
05:00
8 41
9 73
05:15
19 38
4 64
05:30
9 29
20 50
05:45
15 47
51 155
21 57
54 244
105
399
06:00
19 28
37 51
06:15
20 30
61 73
06:30
41 31
59 55
06:45
32 26
112
115
88 48
245
227
357
342
07:00
26 25
59 44
07:15
57 23
40 30
07:30
56 21
44 36
07:45
67 16
206
85 55
39 198
149
404
234
08:00
70 7
78 52
08:15
67 18
60 54
08:30
59 24
62 39
08:45
58 8
254
57 76
48 276
193
530
250
09:00
54 16
65 30
09:15
53 14
66 30
09:30
59 6
75 30
09:45
56 8
222
44 71
23 277
113
499
157
10:00
73 10
78 22
10:15
69 7
66 20
10:30
58 2
36 9
10:45
64 3
264
22 66
15 246
66 510
88 11:00
60 7
63 10
11:15
74 3
65 11
11:30
77 1
70 16
11:45
41 2
252
131
72 91
270
461
522
59 Total
1397
1751
1623
2618
3020
4369
Percent

44.4%

55.6%

38.3%

61.7%

40.9%

59.1 %
Grand
1397
1751
1623
2618
3020
4369
Total
Percent

44.4%

55.6%

38.3%

61.7%

40.9%

59.1%
ADT ADT 7,389 AADT 7,389

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
Diaz Road & 1-15 Frwy Southbound Ramps
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
6 303
12 164
12:15
13 229
10 166
12:30
12 248
5 172
12:45
8 246
39 1026
5 166
32 668
71 1694
01:00
10 279
6 196
01:15
8 215
5 187
01:30
5 259
4 179
01:45
6 211
29 964
3 198
18 760
47 1724
02:00
7 244
3 176
02:15
10 232
4 175
02:30
9 296
7 153
02:45
7 253
33 1025
7 189
21 693
54 1718
03:00
7 323
0 160
03:15
9 318
0 150
03:30
8 355
9 151
03:45
29 314
53 1310
4 132
13 593
66 1903
04:00
20 399
9 154
04:15
16 323
17 157
04:30
23 390
22 168
04:45
29 302
88 1414
22 150
70 629
158
2043
05:00
35 429
19 112
05:15
36 273
23 145
05:30
32 267
33 94
05:45
58 182
161
1151
55 112
130
463
291
1614
06:00
53 192
68 107
06:15
54 139
67 112
06:30
87 143
101
95 06:45
95 96
289
570
141
123
377
437
666
1007
07:00
116
133
144
91 07:15
121
91 148
93 07:30
135
148
142
87 07:45
144
91 516
463
248
53 682
324
1198
787
08:00
155
59 236
75 08:15
168
71 195
102
08:30
161
126
203
85 08:45
167
81 651
337
225
60 859
322
1510
659
09:00
172
53 236
67 09:15
184
71 166
62 09:30
164
69 191
39 09:45
188
42 708
235
189
33 782
201
1490
436
10:00
235
38 180
41 10:15
205
35 139
33 10:30
256
29 137
21 10:45
210
15 906
117
171
24 627
119
1533
236
11:00
243
11 155
19 11:15
230
12 156
13 11:30
233
28 161
19 11:45
223
121
929
631
190
18 662
69 1591
132
Total
4402
8675
4273
5278
8675
13953
Percent

33.7%

66.3%

44.7%

55.3%

38.3%

61.7%
Grand
4402
8675
4273
5278
8675
13953
Total
Percent

33.7%

66.3%

44.7%

55.3%

38.3%

61.7%
ADT ADT 22,628 AADT 22,628

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
1-15 Frwy Southbound Ramps & Ynez Road
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
86 729
56 512
12:15
63 642
22 534
12:30
62 687
20 523
12:45
70 667
281
2725
37 575
135
2144
416
4869
01:00
67 624
19 478
01:15
51 630
18 473
01:30
39 711
20 475
01:45
29 643
186
2608
14 465
71 1891
257
4499
02:00
17 711
23 523
02:15
17 719
24 497
02:30
18 819
17 499
02:45
23 879
75 3128
32 520
96 2039
171
5167
03:00
18 817
45 492
03:15
21 804
43 544
03:30
29 779
70 541
03:45
36 753
104
3153
93 575
251
2152
355
5305
04:00
45 839
128
580
04:15
65 873
172
539
04:30
52 837
243
591
04:45
57 839
219
3388
324
583
867
2293
1086
5681
05:00
67 846
458
556
05:15
46 851
539
575
05:30
74 818
501
525
05:45
93 833
280
3348
463
446
1961
2102
2241
5450
06:00
72 758
502
392
06:15
110
747
439
386
06:30
154
760
509
401
06:45
219
735
555
3000
566
331
2016
1510
2571
4510
07:00
208
532
556
368
07:15
321
514
530
296
07:30
499
407
583
276
07:45
654
439
1682
1892
681
211
2350
1151
4032
3043
08:00
551
366
617
287
08:15
577
376
627
332
08:30
592
329
623
235
08:45
516
350
2236
1421
706
231
2573
1085
4809
2506
09:00
475
294
530
218
09:15
430
296
540
205
09:30
547
272
565
155
09:45
548
176
2000
1038
553
143
2188
721
4188
1759
10:00
601
195
495
128
10:15
610
191
492
116
10:30
567
172
583
92 10:45
633
152
2411
710
559
55 2129
391
4540
1101
11:00
591
141
496
64 11:15
633
111
531
57 11:30
654
84 508
43 11:45
619
1091
2497
4451
526
321
2061
1961
4558
641
Total
12526
26856
16698
17675
29224
44531
Percent

31.8%

68.2%

48.6%

51.4%

39.6%

60.4%
Grand
12526
26856
16698
17675
29224
44531
Total
Percent

31.8%

68.2%

48.6%

51.4%

39.6%

60.4%
ADT ADT 73,755 AADT 73,755

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
Ynez Road & Moraga Road
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
52 397
24 326
12:15
53 387
18 359
12:30
68 468
21 403
12:45
60 472
233
1724
21 400
84 1488
317
3212
01:00
41 405
15 350
01:15
45 420
15 345
01:30
28 461
12 342
01:45
25 442
139
1728
11 373
53 1410
192
3138
02:00
12 441
20 319
02:15
10 519
18 381
02:30
14 524
6 423
02:45
14 582
50 2066
30 389
74 1512
124
3578
03:00
13 534
34 317
03:15
14 521
39 388
03:30
7 537
54 453
03:45
19 525
53 2117
91 422
218
1580
271
3697
04:00
22 594
93 433
04:15
30 607
134
414
04:30
40 592
195
419
04:45
32 573
124
2366
253
442
675
1708
799
4074
05:00
42 588
210
373
05:15
35 629
287
383
05:30
58 571
279
347
05:45
59 587
194
2375
252
330
1028
1433
1222
3808
06:00
74 536
301
301
06:15
80 512
335
334
06:30
117
507
344
299
06:45
157
459
428
2014
454
296
1434
1230
1862
3244
07:00
131
379
441
263
07:15
234
381
461
282
07:30
323
360
495
212
07:45
338
349
1026
1469
647
199
2044
956
3070
2425
08:00
319
333
539
228
08:15
364
319
520
237
08:30
371
313
599
191
08:45
389
333
1443
1298
563
158
2221
814
3664
2112
09:00
303
253
420
157
09:15
326
256
456
157
09:30
343
233
464
95 09:45
334
172
1306
914
432
91 1772
500
3078
1414
10:00
370
179
394
80 10:15
390
141
385
80 10:30
362
148
406
77 10:45
374
121
1496
589
438
33 1623
270
3119
859
11:00
368
120
357
42 11:15
380
80 390
33 11:30
412
67 381
22 11:45
435
841
1595
3511
384
27 1512
1241
3107
475
Total
8087
19011
12738
13025
20825
32036
Percent

29.8%

70.2%

49.4%

50.6%

39.4%

60.6%
Grand
8087
19011
12738
13025
20825
32036
Total
Percent

29.8%

70.2%

49.4%

50.6%

39.4%

60.6%
ADT ADT 52,861 AADT 52,861

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
Moraga Road & Cosmic Drive
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
35 356
20 291
12:15
31 297
20 304
12:30
40 370
16 351
12:45
25 321
131
1344
11 327
67 1273
198
2617
01:00
29 319
12 316
01:15
23 360
8 314
01:30
22 366
13 312
01:45
25 342
99 1387
8 348
41 1290
140
2677
02:00
7 348
11 288
02:15
2 448
13 296
02:30
6 440
7 329
02:45
9 511
24 1747
16 341
47 1254
71 3001
03:00
10 443
33 292
03:15
6 449
28 406
03:30
4 408
50 422
03:45
10 407
30 1707
65 403
176
1523
206
3230
04:00
18 469
70 377
04:15
25 533
104
353
04:30
27 481
138
380
04:45
27 455
97 1938
185
379
497
1489
594
3427
05:00
32 458
188
316
05:15
35 509
173
299
05:30
40 425
191
307
05:45
51 469
158
1861
180
271
732
1193
890
3054
06:00
61 396
204
234
06:15
75 397
232
283
06:30
90 361
240
202
06:45
127
379
353
1533
351
217
1027
936
1380
2469
07:00
133
299
332
194
07:15
165
265
374
195
07:30
225
245
380
152
07:45
271
245
794
1054
500
124
1586
665
2380
1719
08:00
246
212
459
145
08:15
250
230
533
182
08:30
279
226
526
130
08:45
226
237
1001
905
524
120
2042
577
3043
1482
09:00
192
186
372
106
09:15
247
155
377
109
09:30
194
162
391
58 09:45
231
100
864
603
338
65 1478
338
2342
941
10:00
269
121
313
53 10:15
305
106
283
61 10:30
272
106
382
49 10:45
311
75 1157
408
336
28 1314
191
2471
599
11:00
302
74 304
29 11:15
324
56 303
27 11:30
303
40 319
20 11:45
391
581
1320
2281
351
161
1277
92 2597
320
Total
6028
14715
10284
10821
16312
25536
Percent

29.1 %

70.9%

48.7%

51.3%

39.0%

61.0%
Grand
6028
14715
10284
10821
16312
25536
Total
Percent

29.1 %

70.9%

48.7%

51.3%

39.0%

61.0%
ADT ADT41,848 AADT41,848

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
Cosmic Drive & Margarita Road
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
33 353
14 200
12:15
33 305
9 200
12:30
36 339
8 211
12:45
19 340
121
1337
9 209
40 820
161
2157
01:00
29 325
9 210
01:15
23 356
5 202
01:30
14 371
5 209
01:45
18 309
84 1361
5 206
24 827
108
2188
02:00
8 338
6 183
02:15
2 426
5 197
02:30
7 410
3 227
02:45
10 416
27 1590
16 248
30 855
57 2445
03:00
11 389
16 240
03:15
9 435
17 264
03:30
2 373
34 256
03:45
12 381
34 1578
36 318
103
1078
137
2656
04:00
9 428
43 240
04:15
21 448
60 234
04:30
35 452
72 262
04:45
35 409
100
1737
104
253
279
989
379
2726
05:00
19 424
97 213
05:15
40 440
101
190
05:30
40 427
106
199
05:45
80 480
179
1771
89 186
393
788
572
2559
06:00
56 389
100
158
06:15
69 380
139
175
06:30
98 334
164
132
06:45
155
373
378
1476
195
155
598
620
976
2096
07:00
153
282
198
105
07:15
190
277
191
136
07:30
252
222
238
98 07:45
289
227
884
1008
330
90 957
429
1841
1437
08:00
249
206
295
104
08:15
279
219
308
127
08:30
248
182
346
94 08:45
229
226
1005
833
345
75 1294
400
2299
1233
09:00
229
173
227
82 09:15
240
150
245
69 09:30
256
147
246
36 09:45
224
107
949
577
196
41 914
228
1863
805
10:00
263
116
188
34 10:15
298
88 217
43 10:30
256
100
194
24 10:45
336
82 1153
386
219
20 818
121
1971
507
11:00
265
65 200
19 11:15
334
43 193
24 11:30
351
40 221
17 11:45
401
501
1351
1981
225
121
839
72 2190
270
Total
6265
13852
6289
7227
12554
21079
Percent

31.1 %

68.9%

46.5%

53.5%

37.3%

62.7%
Grand
6265
13852
6289
7227
12554
21079
Total
Percent

31.1 %

68.9%

46.5%

53.5%

37.3%

62.7%
ADT ADT 33,633 AADT 33,633

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
Margarita Road & Tee Drive
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
37 363
8 227
12:15
18 314
8 253
12:30
32 340
5 256
12:45
17 344
104
1361
5 236
26 972
130
2333
01:00
19 346
10 226
01:15
20 323
7 247
01:30
11 346
10 257
01:45
23 346
73 1361
3 277
30 1007
103
2368
02:00
5 314
1 239
02:15
0 366
8 243
02:30
7 435
2 258
02:45
10 419
22 1534
20 284
31 1024
53 2558
03:00
4 431
15 293
03:15
9 448
18 308
03:30
2 437
45 337
03:45
15 440
30 1756
35 304
113
1242
143
2998
04:00
7 419
43 284
04:15
10 463
69 288
04:30
25 464
92 290
04:45
31 428
73 1774
123
277
327
1139
400
2913
05:00
13 401
110
233
05:15
34 448
113
202
05:30
36 454
108
220
05:45
75 452
158
1755
137
233
468
888
626
2643
06:00
67 387
142
169
06:15
64 376
185
213
06:30
89 375
212
185
06:45
123
314
343
1452
252
188
791
755
1134
2207
07:00
115
283
257
160
07:15
161
247
287
154
07:30
197
250
337
119
07:45
225
245
698
1025
416
132
1297
565
1995
1590
08:00
196
216
428
116
08:15
254
243
412
154
08:30
235
197
422
103
08:45
222
205
907
861
355
100
1617
473
2524
1334
09:00
210
166
279
105
09:15
228
155
312
91 09:30
204
152
324
51 09:45
251
110
893
583
262
55 1177
302
2070
885
10:00
210
107
257
50 10:15
278
98 262
42 10:30
259
86 252
23 10:45
320
80 1067
371
262
23 1033
138
2100
509
11:00
275
54 236
34 11:15
324
28 266
27 11:30
304
41 268
17 11:45
326
481
1229
1711
276
121
1046
90 2275
261
Total
5597
14004
7956
8595
13553
22599
Percent

28.6%

71.4%

48.1%

51.9%

37.5%

62.5%
Grand
5597
14004
7956
8595
13553
22599
Total
Percent

28.6%

71.4%

48.1 %

51.9%

37.5%

62.5%
ADT ADT 36,152 AADT 36,152

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
Tee Drive & Meadows Parkway
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
21 241
7 274
12:15
9 219
5 296
12:30
18 240
6 285
12:45
10 225
58 925
1 243
19 1098
77 2023
01:00
9 234
6 273
01:15
14 209
8 283
01:30
3 239
5 304
01:45
11 205
37 887
3 288
22 1148
59 2035
02:00
2 220
1 219
02:15
0 268
6 282
02:30
1 287
5 304
02:45
3 250
6 1025
9 317
21 1122
27 2147
03:00
3 326
14 318
03:15
2 283
13 357
03:30
2 300
38 436
03:45
6 316
13 1225
29 352
94 1463
107
2688
04:00
6 277
33 313
04:15
5 320
60 349
04:30
15 314
81 359
04:45
23 291
49 1202
92 304
266
1325
315
2527
05:00
9 266
91 288
05:15
18 317
97 239
05:30
21 308
90 283
05:45
46 292
94 1183
101
253
379
1063
473
2246
06:00
36 238
124
190
06:15
37 236
148
273
06:30
54 245
194
215
06:45
83 196
210
915
235
206
701
884
911
1799
07:00
72 169
235
173
07:15
109
160
287
178
07:30
127
137
375
132
07:45
133
146
441
612
434
130
1331
613
1772
1225
08:00
145
126
370
173
08:15
164
131
406
156
08:30
199
123
451
92 08:45
137
121
645
501
430
108
1657
529
2302
1030
09:00
144
92 303
91 09:15
160
91 321
96 09:30
152
81 324
54 09:45
149
73 605
337
292
58 1240
299
1845
636
10:00
124
55 325
48 10:15
225
56 312
43 10:30
182
45 326
24 10:45
252
44 783
200
290
27 1253
142
2036
342
11:00
175
30 256
29 11:15
214
14 304
22 11:30
214
21 266
18 11:45
212
211
815
861
320
9 1146
78 1961
164
Total
3756
9098
8129
9764
11885
18862
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

45.4%

54.6%

38.7%

61.3%
Grand
3756
9098
8129
9764
11885
18862
Total
Percent

29.2%

70.8%

45.4%

54.6%

38.7%

61.3%
ADT ADT 30,747 AADT 30,747

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Rancho California Road Btwn
Meadows Parkway & Butterfield Stage Road
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
16 213
9 164
12:15
9 201
6 245
12:30
11 191
3 216
12:45
8 210
44 815
2 195
20 820
64 1635
01:00
8 207
4 187
01:15
7 190
4 231
01:30
2 219
5 223
01:45
11 164
28 780
3 226
16 867
44 1647
02:00
1 192
1 178
02:15
3 228
5 230
02:30
1 235
4 249
02:45
2 249
7 904
5 215
15 872
22 1776
03:00
4 273
8 320
03:15
2 266
10 260
03:30
2 260
32 265
03:45
3 286
11 1085
30 241
80 1086
91 2171
04:00
4 239
23 215
04:15
5 310
39 236
04:30
11 262
61 264
04:45
20 247
40 1058
67 208
190
923
230
1981
05:00
10 266
70 206
05:15
18 269
76 198
05:30
20 302
73 197
05:45
36 243
84 1080
73 180
292
781
376
1861
06:00
34 222
94 136
06:15
38 230
111
177
06:30
51 232
134
147
06:45
77 181
200
865
191
173
530
633
730
1498
07:00
78 148
199
124
07:15
82 139
215
118
07:30
103
144
311
101
07:45
129
144
392
575
379
81 1104
424
1496
999
08:00
141
109
351
115
08:15
137
130
372
132
08:30
152
97 319
77 08:45
117
95 547
431
273
92 1315
416
1862
847
09:00
118
100
211
59 09:15
141
77 201
52 09:30
134
74 218
40 09:45
120
64 513
315
217
49 847
200
1360
515
10:00
131
42 202
46 10:15
169
45 225
17 10:30
142
40 190
16 10:45
196
32 638
159
217
11 834
90 1472
249
11:00
173
29 180
16 11:15
180
17 224
10 11:30
194
15 199
11 11:45
181
15 728
761
204
71 807
441
1535
120
Total
3232
8143
6050
7156
9282
15299
Percent

28.4%

71.6%

45.8%

54.2%

37.8%

62.2%
Grand
3232
8143
6050
7156
9282
15299
Total
Percent

28.4%

71.6%

45.8%

54.2%

37.8%

62.2%
ADT ADT 24,581 AADT 24,581

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Redwood Road Btwn
Loma Linda Road & Wolf Creek Drive North
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
0 8
2 4
12:15
3 6
1 3
12:30
0 6
0 4
12:45
1 7
4 27
1 4
4 15
8 42
01:00
0 9
0 4
01:15
0 4
0 3
01:30
1 12
0 3
01:45
0 5
1 30
0 4
0 14
1 44
02:00
1 15
0 3
02:15
0 36
0 6
02:30
0 38
0 50
02:45
0 16
1 105
0 9
0 68
1 173
03:00
2 5
1 9
03:15
0 14
0 17
03:30
0 25
0 10
03:45
0 25
2 69
0 6
1 42
3 111
04:00
0 15
0 5
04:15
0 7
0 5
04:30
1 6
0 3
04:45
0 10
1 38
0 2
0 15
1 53
05:00
1 12
0 1
05:15
1 8
1 2
05:30
0 9
0 4
05:45
0 12
2 41
0 1
1 8
3 49
06:00
0 2
0 6
06:15
0 7
0 3
06:30
0 9
0 1
06:45
3 4
3 22
2 5
2 15
5 37
07:00
3 10
4 3
07:15
8 6
0 2
07:30
40 5
10 3
07:45
78 4
129
25 31
3 45
11 174
36 08:00
12 5
21 3
08:15
12 14
13 5
08:30
16 10
7 3
08:45
12 5
52 34
7 3
48 14
100
48 09:00
2 2
5 1
09:15
2 3
2 5
09:30
4 2
1 3
09:45
3 1
11 8
2 6
10 15
21 23
10:00
0 2
4 3
10:15
5 1
5 1
10:30
6 4
2 1
10:45
7 2
18 9
5 1
16 6
34 15
11:00
7 0
1 1
11:15
5 1
2 0
11:30
4 3
2 0
11:45
7 2
23 61
4 31
9 4
32 10
Total
247
414
136
227
383
641
Percent

37.4%

62.6%

37.5%

62.5%

37.4%

62.6%
Grand
247
414
136
227
383
641
Total
Percent

37.4%

62.6%

37.5%

62.5%

37.4%

62.6%
ADT ADT 1,024 AADT 1,024

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Temecula Parkway Btwn
Bedford Court & Pechanga Parkway
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
71 450
86 412
12:15
95 378
77 400
12:30
67 427
80 355
12:45
46 405
279
1660
64 417
307
1584
586
3244
01:00
52 404
51 339
01:15
45 389
74 343
01:30
51 455
58 414
01:45
50 469
198
1717
48 331
231
1427
429
3144
02:00
28 321
51 305
02:15
37 461
63 439
02:30
35 499
60 390
02:45
39 527
139
1808
64 381
238
1515
377
3323
03:00
43 484
92 417
03:15
37 486
78 410
03:30
54 471
99 410
03:45
70 442
204
1883
102
355
371
1592
575
3475
04:00
57 473
141
421
04:15
70 383
138
333
04:30
119
473
178
369
04:45
107
408
353
1737
217
341
674
1464
1027
3201
05:00
102
474
204
329
05:15
133
482
213
345
05:30
170
505
215
301
05:45
160
441
565
1902
272
256
904
1231
1469
3133
06:00
152
426
256
352
06:15
229
452
236
298
06:30
231
461
293
304
06:45
206
419
818
1758
307
267
1092
1221
1910
2979
07:00
214
355
326
285
07:15
259
399
320
265
07:30
394
375
382
230
07:45
472
368
1339
1497
452
247
1480
1027
2819
2524
08:00
362
353
381
278
08:15
445
353
418
258
08:30
387
382
412
228
08:45
336
340
1530
1428
544
213
1755
977
3285
2405
09:00
360
319
370
231
09:15
309
316
385
172
09:30
367
270
334
199
09:45
400
210
1436
1115
350
197
1439
799
2875
1914
10:00
386
229
314
161
10:15
390
193
312
146
10:30
417
162
367
160
10:45
343
136
1536
720
312
148
1305
615
2841
1335
11:00
392
128
322
126
11:15
410
101
332
99 11:30
452
123
382
109
11:45
447
921
1701
4441
369
1051
1405
439
3106
883
Total
10098
17669
11201
13891
21299
31560
Percent

36.4%

63.6%

44.6%

55.4%

40.3%

59.7%
Grand
10098
17669
11201
13891
21299
31560
Total
Percent

36.4%

63.6%

44.6%

55.4%

40.3%

59.7%
ADT ADT 52,859 AADT 52,859

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Temecula Parkway Btwn
Pechanga Parkway & Avenida De Missions
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
59 346
30 422
12:15
68 351
36 382
12:30
31 330
38 349
12:45
38 373
196
1400
26 340
130
1493
326
2893
01:00
28 329
32 325
01:15
30 376
26 391
01:30
16 343
21 376
01:45
27 425
101
1473
19 374
98 1466
199
2939
02:00
16 301
17 391
02:15
22 430
17 345
02:30
23 417
16 329
02:45
29 489
90 1637
23 293
73 1358
163
2995
03:00
24 454
40 569
03:15
20 420
45 349
03:30
26 451
52 329
03:45
31 454
101
1779
68 307
205
1554
306
3333
04:00
23 503
90 368
04:15
38 499
97 286
04:30
59 454
142
290
04:45
63 458
183
1914
186
295
515
1239
698
3153
05:00
51 430
198
310
05:15
57 466
191
302
05:30
49 483
236
270
05:45
55 484
212
1863
342
274
967
1156
1179
3019
06:00
81 428
233
255
06:15
80 471
310
269
06:30
127
397
274
211
06:45
144
372
432
1668
238
239
1055
974
1487
2642
07:00
162
282
278
236
07:15
206
285
313
229
07:30
334
309
285
213
07:45
442
291
1144
1167
390
193
1266
871
2410
2038
08:00
355
202
315
207
08:15
379
223
346
190
08:30
381
214
404
157
08:45
330
216
1445
855
390
160
1455
714
2900
1569
09:00
332
193
294
183
09:15
257
187
362
122
09:30
305
163
329
139
09:45
322
128
1216
671
342
106
1327
550
2543
1221
10:00
301
146
336
111
10:15
329
108
367
101
10:30
314
84 331
67 10:45
306
91 1250
429
370
64 1404
343
2654
772
11:00
313
97 334
54 11:15
376
68 404
44 11:30
329
89 373
43 11:45
348
55 1366
3091
375
421
1486
183
2852
492
Total
7736
15165
9981
11901
17717
27066
Percent

33.8%

66.2%

45.6%

54.4%

39.6%

60.4%
Grand
7736
15165
9981
11901
17717
27066
Total
Percent

33.8%

66.2%

45.6%

54.4%

39.6%

60.4%
ADT ADT 44,783 AADT 44,783

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Temecula Parkway Btwn
Avenida De Missions & Margarita Road
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
54 421
31 374
12:15
62 328
30 300
12:30
34 403
32 285
12:45
33 329
183
1481
25 308
118
1267
301
2748
01:00
23 357
29 309
01:15
29 308
24 304
01:30
17 376
18 323
01:45
25 364
94 1405
21 306
92 1242
186
2647
02:00
15 344
16 292
02:15
23 353
17 270
02:30
22 418
15 293
02:45
27 388
87 1503
19 244
67 1099
154
2602
03:00
28 489
39 313
03:15
23 516
41 279
03:30
26 412
50 219
03:45
24 473
101
1890
64 270
194
1081
295
2971
04:00
23 451
91 255
04:15
34 497
95 250
04:30
55 506
144
177
04:45
71 452
183
1906
168
256
498
938
681
2844
05:00
53 449
189
207
05:15
56 401
197
250
05:30
45 457
213
231
05:45
69 445
223
1752
289
238
888
926
1111
2678
06:00
76 469
248
269
06:15
72 431
269
236
06:30
125
435
249
225
06:45
149
350
422
1685
228
205
994
935
1416
2620
07:00
140
254
252
228
07:15
188
276
299
221
07:30
234
287
301
167
07:45
308
267
870
1084
377
182
1229
798
2099
1882
08:00
322
173
319
186
08:15
333
229
337
179
08:30
355
177
380
153
08:45
324
196
1334
775
371
142
1407
660
2741
1435
09:00
300
212
294
151
09:15
283
170
310
119
09:30
271
172
323
122
09:45
334
124
1188
678
309
102
1236
494
2424
1172
10:00
308
147
311
117
10:15
332
109
291
94 10:30
340
86 280
60 10:45
328
96 1308
438
287
56 1169
327
2477
765
11:00
354
101
294
49 11:15
359
61 304
42 11:30
377
93 288
42 11:45
335
60 1425
3151
335
421
1221
175
2646
490
Total
7418
14912
9113
9942
16531
24854
Percent

33.2%

66.8%

47.8%

52.2%

39.9%

60.1 %
Grand
7418
14912
9113
9942
16531
24854
Total
Percent

33.2%

66.8%

47.8%

52.2%

39.9%

60.1%
ADT ADT41,385 AADT41,385

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTC0UNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Temecula Parkway Btwn
Margarita Road & Butterfield Stage Road
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
26 216
12 178
12:15
42 222
16 188
12:30
22 236
8 186
12:45
18 169
108
843
8 178
44 730
152
1573
01:00
13 232
14 156
01:15
14 209
16 170
01:30
9 203
11 169
01:45
9 217
45 861
13 173
54 668
99 1529
02:00
9 223
7 184
02:15
15 205
6 133
02:30
11 284
7 191
02:45
11 250
46 962
14 190
34 698
80 1660
03:00
18 321
22 152
03:15
15 262
30 142
03:30
7 279
35 166
03:45
16 264
56 1126
36 150
123
610
179
1736
04:00
17 296
67 161
04:15
24 290
54 183
04:30
21 276
93 156
04:45
36 271
98 1133
106
124
320
624
418
1757
05:00
38 282
116
176
05:15
31 278
138
160
05:30
44 302
176
160
05:45
56 281
169
1143
179
105
609
601
778
1744
06:00
69 284
155
146
06:15
67 232
181
164
06:30
94 266
126
136
06:45
97 200
327
982
146
124
608
570
935
1552
07:00
82 173
135
104
07:15
129
161
222
120
07:30
122
219
178
88 07:45
156
144
489
697
219
91 754
403
1243
1100
08:00
147
152
204
96 08:15
167
162
184
96 08:30
179
138
222
83 08:45
150
134
643
586
242
74 852
349
1495
935
09:00
163
140
172
92 09:15
117
110
180
81 09:30
128
102
190
63 09:45
148
88 556
440
193
54 735
290
1291
730
10:00
157
94 136
47 10:15
145
82 189
48 10:30
168
64 165
29 10:45
184
67 654
307
166
17 656
141
1310
448
11:00
198
55 168
20 11:15
173
48 211
25 11:30
207
45 171
11 11:45
168
39 746
1871
146
241
696
80 1442
267
Total
3937
9267
5485
5764
9422
15031
Percent

29.8%

70.2%

48.8%

51.2%

38.5%

61.5%
Grand
3937
9267
5485
5764
9422
15031
Total
Percent

29.8%

70.2%

48.8%

51.2%

38.5%

61.5%
ADT ADT 24,453 AADT 24,453

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Temecula Parkway Btwn
Butterfield Stage Road & East City Limit
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
20 158
10 135
12:15
20 167
10 157
12:30
24 161
9 166
12:45
12 147
76 633
8 158
37 616
113
1249
01:00
8 172
7 168
01:15
13 159
19 152
01:30
8 141
5 127
01:45
7 151
36 623
7 184
38 631
74 1254
02:00
10 161
6 169
02:15
12 148
4 149
02:30
11 202
4 168
02:45
11 228
44 739
10 219
24 705
68 1444
03:00
11 234
19 157
03:15
20 253
21 121
03:30
4 253
18 170
03:45
11 270
46 1010
32 160
90 608
136
1618
04:00
11 284
40 169
04:15
20 278
45 190
04:30
19 261
67 164
04:45
25 214
75 1037
66 122
218
645
293
1682
05:00
30 259
80 206
05:15
38 245
79 147
05:30
45 267
137
167
05:45
57 270
170
1041
122
135
418
655
588
1696
06:00
60 209
118
161
06:15
82 184
133
147
06:30
111
221
77 123
06:45
101
177
354
791
111
105
439
536
793
1327
07:00
113
144
132
98 07:15
99 134
212
90 07:30
113
156
213
73 07:45
129
127
454
561
219
78 776
339
1230
900
08:00
117
94 254
87 08:15
124
113
185
79 08:30
162
114
222
73 08:45
108
90 511
411
228
76 889
315
1400
726
09:00
120
92 179
55 09:15
98 94
129
42 09:30
105
84 173
52 09:45
89 74
412
344
166
72 647
221
1059
565
10:00
135
54 131
46 10:15
116
66 121
30 10:30
123
35 167
25 10:45
146
48 520
203
152
15 571
116
1091
319
11:00
138
34 118
15 11:15
121
33 192
18 11:30
138
40 170
7 11:45
136
281
533
1351
125
151
605
55 1138
190
Total
3231
7528
4752
5442
7983
12970
Percent

30.0%

70.0%

46.6%

53.4%

38.1 %

61.9%
Grand
3231
7528
4752
5442
7983
12970
Total
Percent

30.0%

70.0%

46.6%

53.4%

38.1 %

61.9%
ADT ADT 20,953 AADT 20,953

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOLINTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Via La Vida Btwn
Margarita Road & Solana Way
Start 5/28/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Tima Wall RAnrninn Aftarnnnn KAnrninn Aftarnnnn Mnrninn Aftarnnnn Unrninn Aftarnnnn Mnrninn Aftarnnnn 12:00
0 6
2 3
12:15
0 2
0 0
12:30
3 2
1 0
12:45
2 8
5 18
0 4
3 7
8 25
01:00
1 8
1 2
01:15
0 10
0 3
01:30
0 3
0 1
01:45
0 4
1 25
0 4
1 10
2 35
02:00
0 6
0 3
02:15
0 6
0 5
02:30
0 13
0 5
02:45
1 12
1 37
0 9
0 22
1 59
03:00
0 12
0 2
03:15
0 7
0 2
03:30
0 7
0 2
03:45
0 0
0 26
1 3
1 9
1 35
04:00
0 6
0 2
04:15
0 4
0 9
04:30
2 8
0 3
04:45
1 9
3 27
2 1
2 15
5 42
05:00
0 5
2 1
05:15
0 9
2 2
05:30
2 7
0 2
05:45
0 4
2 25
0 2
4 7
6 32
06:00
0 4
0 2
06:15
1 4
2 2
06:30
0 10
2 1
06:45
3 4
4 22
1 2
5 7
9 29
07:00
1 5
2 1
07:15
8 1
4 2
07:30
10 7
3 2
07:45
10 4
29 17
3 0
12 5
41 22
08:00
3 3
2 5
08:15
7 5
4 0
08:30
5 4
3 0
08:45
3 3
18 15
2 0
11 5
29 20
09:00
2 4
2 0
09:15
6 2
4 3
09:30
4 4
2 2
09:45
3 1
15 11
1 0
9 5
24 16
10:00
2 1
1 1
10:15
0 0
0 0
10:30
3 1
2 2
10:45
2 1
7 3
2 2
5 5
12 8
11:00
1 3
0 1
11:15
3 0
1 0
11:30
1 0
1 0
11:45
2 0
7 31
2 01
4 1
1 11
4 Total
92 229
57 Percent

28.7%

71.3%

36.8%
Grand
92 228
57 Total
Percent

28.7%

71.3%

36.8%
ADT ADT 476 AADT 476
98 149 327

63.2% 31.3% 68.7%
98 149 327

63.2%

31.3% 68.7%

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Wolf Creek Drive North Btwn
Pechanga Parkway & Wolf Valley Road
Start 5/28/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
1 18
2 18
12:15
4 23
3 11
12:30
0 18
1 18
12:45
0 20
5 79
1 28
7 75
12 154
01:00
0 23
1 10
01:15
1 17
1 13
01:30
1 27
1 17
01:45
0 14
2 81
1 23
4 63
6 144
02:00
1 27
2 23
02:15
1 41
0 35
02:30
0 52
1 71
02:45
0 38
2 158
1 43
4 172
6 330
03:00
4 14
1 46
03:15
3 69
1 66
03:30
2 52
1 32
03:45
2 50
11 185
0 31
3 175
14 360
04:00
2 31
0 20
04:15
4 18
1 22
04:30
15 16
1 26
04:45
7 17
28 82
1 18
3 86
31 168
05:00
8 26
1 21
05:15
12 35
1 23
05:30
9 16
2 21
05:45
9 35
38 112
2 15
6 80
44 192
06:00
9 18
6 27
06:15
15 23
2 27
06:30
18 18
2 15
06:45
18 25
60 84
8 21
18 90
78 174
07:00
15 15
7 14
07:15
26 17
9 12
07:30
60 16
20 13
07:45
81 18
182
66 67
13 103
52 285
118
08:00
34 14
59 18
08:15
35 16
58 9
08:30
62 18
86 12
08:45
47 11
178
59 31
16 234
55 412
114
09:00
12 8
13 6
09:15
18 4
9 14
09:30
14 8
14 17
09:45
16 5
60 25
6 11
42 48
102
73 10:00
13 11
10 10
10:15
33 5
28 6
10:30
27 7
12 5
10:45
21 4
94 27
13 3
63 24
157
51 11:00
20 3
16 6
11:15
15 1
6 1
11:30
16 3
13 4
11:45
10 4
61 11
1 12
51 47
161
108
27 Total
721
969
534
936
1255
1905
Percent

42.7%

57.3%

36.3%

63.7%

39.7%

60.3%
Grand
721
969
534
936
1255
1905
Total
Percent

42.7%

57.3%

36.3%

63.7%

39.7%

60.3%
ADT ADT 3,160 AADT 3,160

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Wolf Valley Road Btwn
Pechanga Parkway & Redhawk Parkway
Start 5/28/2025 Northeast Hour Totals Southwest Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
24 99
14 73
12:15
21 93
5 111
12:30
16 99
9 114
12:45
14 100
75 391
7 114
35 412
110
803
01:00
14 103
6 101
01:15
7 90
7 124
01:30
7 102
13 135
01:45
14 105
42 400
5 108
31 468
73 868
02:00
8 97
5 111
02:15
6 129
6 110
02:30
21 139
6 113
02:45
8 142
43 507
6 141
23 475
66 982
03:00
17 141
7 122
03:15
4 165
7 194
03:30
10 191
15 183
03:45
5 230
36 727
13 134
42 633
78 1360
04:00
8 170
25 131
04:15
7 159
20 106
04:30
6 167
38 137
04:45
17 194
38 690
31 141
114
515
152
1205
05:00
8 182
51 110
05:15
9 146
69 124
05:30
9 165
84 129
05:45
17 147
43 640
107
129
311
492
354
1132
06:00
23 172
95 109
06:15
20 150
120
131
06:30
19 159
157
116
06:45
31 141
93 622
133
90 505
446
598
1068
07:00
24 126
119
103
07:15
44 110
137
79 07:30
63 121
148
104
07:45
95 95
226
452
174
82 578
368
804
820
08:00
97 117
183
90 08:15
116
102
159
97 08:30
135
72 184
82 08:45
97 89
445
380
168
56 694
325
1139
705
09:00
58 72
124
62 09:15
70 74
119
58 09:30
53 61
116
46 09:45
71 58
252
265
107
44 466
210
718
475
10:00
65 57
89 39
10:15
93 35
116
33 10:30
64 50
108
45 10:45
83 41
305
183
83 15
396
132
701
315
11:00
60 39
108
25 11:15
80 25
96 14
11:30
70 29
96 12
11:45
79 241
289
1171
101
9 401
60 690
177
Total
1887
5374
3596
4536
5483
9910
Percent

26.0%

74.0%

44.2%

55.8%

35.6%

64.4%
Grand
1887
5374
3596
4536
5483
9910
Total
Percent

26.0%

74.0%

44.2%

55.8%

35.6%

64.4%
ADT ADT 15,393 AADT 15,393

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Sommers Bend Btwn
Butterfield Stage Road & Lupine Drive
Start 6/3/2025 Northwest Hour Totals Southeast Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
1 32
3 28
12:15
1 17
4 24
12:30
1 30
4 33
12:45
0 23
3 102
1 22
12 107
15 209
01:00
1 25
3 28
01:15
1 24
2 25
01:30
0 25
1 23
01:45
0 28
2 102
1 31
7 107
9 209
02:00
0 40
0 25
02:15
0 48
0 19
02:30
3 38
1 28
02:45
0 47
3 173
1 55
2 127
5 300
03:00
1 42
1 32
03:15
2 37
0 50
03:30
1 45
0 46
03:45
2 39
6 163
1 47
2 175
8 338
04:00
7 38
1 30
04:15
5 34
1 35
04:30
9 33
1 41
04:45
7 34
28 139
3 33
6 139
34 278
05:00
11 37
2 42
05:15
11 28
1 42
05:30
20 39
3 44
05:45
11 28
53 1321
6 56
12 184
65 316
06:00
20 35
6 38
06:15
16 26
20 45
06:30
28 31
16 38
06:45
18 14
82 106
20 36
62 157
144
263
07:00
23 15
24 39
07:15
49 11
23 25
07:30
52 15
26 26
07:45
44 9
168
50 33
20 106
110
274
160
08:00
55 16
37 24
08:15
71 8
42 12
08:30
53 7
44 19
08:45
37 18
216
49 44
21 167
76 383
125
09:00
27 7
36 13
09:15
45 3
23 18
09:30
39 9
23 18
09:45
27 4
138
23 21
13 103
62 241
85 10:00
43 4
20 16
10:15
46 3
22 8
10:30
28 2
25 13
10:45
33 1
150
10 23
5 90
42 240
52 11:00
44 2
20 3
11:15
30 0
23 3
11:30
22 1
29 5
11:45
40 0
136
31 27
1 1 99
12 235
15 Total
985
1052
668
1298
1653
2350
Percent

48.4%

51.6%

34.0%

66.0%

41.3%

58.7%
Grand
985
1052
668
1298
1653
2350
Total
Percent

48.4%

51.6%

34.0%

66.0%

41.3%

58.7%
ADT ADT 4,003 AADT 4,003

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 1 ends

Sommers Bend Btwn
Lupine Drive & Sorrel Lane
Start 6/3/2025 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
0 18
0 4
12:15
1 19
0 17
12:30
1 17
0 15
12:45
1 16
3 70
0 14
0 50
3 120
01:00
0 14
1 13
01:15
1 26
0 24
01:30
0 18
0 9
01:45
0 26
1 84
0 9
1 55
2 139
02:00
0 12
0 25
02:15
1 18
0 17
02:30
0 19
2 19
02:45
0 18
1 67
0 18
2 79
3 146
03:00
2 20
0 16
03:15
1 26
0 15
03:30
0 41
0 11
03:45
1 21
4 108
2 13
2 55
6 163
04:00
0 17
1 15
04:15
0 22
2 13
04:30
2 21
3 10
04:45
1 21
3 81
4 14
10 52
13 133
05:00
0 18
5 11
05:15
1 13
1 9
05:30
1 25
5 11
05:45
0 12
2 68
2 5
13 36
15 104
06:00
4 21
5 2
06:15
0 16
5 8
06:30
7 10
8 3
06:45
6 9
17 56
12 7
30 20
47 76
07:00
12 18
9 2
07:15
5 13
14 3
07:30
6 16
15 1
07:45
13 5
36 52
30 0
68 6
104
58 08:00
20 13
22 4
08:15
18 10
21 0
08:30
13 8
20 3
08:45
18 4
69 35
11 3
74 10
143
45 09:00
18 6
9 0
09:15
9 3
18 2
09:30
9 7
8 0
09:45
7 3
43 19
13 3
48 5
91 24
10:00
13 5
17 3
10:15
13 2
15 0
10:30
21 3
9 0
10:45
21 1
68 11
15 0
56 3
124
14 11:00
18 2
13 0
11:15
10 0
12 1
11:30
17 0
20 1
11:45
11 0
56 21
15 01
60 2
116
4 Total
303
653
364
373
667
1026
Percent

31.7%

68.3%

49.4%

50.6%

39.4%

60.6%
Grand
303
653
364
373
667
1026
Total
Percent

31.7%

68.3%

49.4%

50.6%

39.4%

60.6%
ADT ADT 1,693 AADT 1,693

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTE)MCOM

Page 1 ends

Sommers Bend Btwn
Sorrel Lane & Butterfield Stage Road
Start 6/3/2025 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00
0 29
0 20
12:15
1 22
0 25
12:30
1 28
0 24
12:45
1 22
3 101
1 18
1 87
4 188
01:00
0 22
1 19
01:15
2 27
0 34
01:30
0 20
0 18
01:45
0 21
2 90
0 11
1 82
3 172
02:00
1 14
0 30
02:15
1 24
0 22
02:30
0 18
2 28
02:45
1 19
3 75
1 24
3 104
6 179
03:00
1 24
0 23
03:15
1 30
0 22
03:30
0 33
0 14
03:45
1 27
3 114
2 22
2 81
5 195
04:00
0 22
1 14
04:15
0 27
2 23
04:30
2 26
3 12
04:45
1 22
3 97
6 19
12 68
15 165
05:00
0 24
7 17
05:15
1 14
1 12
05:30
2 36
7 9
05:45
1 20
4 94
3 11
18 49
22 143
06:00
6 24
4 3
06:15
2 19
8 9
06:30
12 10
11 2
06:45
8 14
28 67
8 9
31 23
59 90
07:00
11 24
13 3
07:15
4 15
14 6
07:30
8 17
21 2
07:45
13 6
36 62
29 0
77 11
113
73 08:00
23 14
30 4
08:15
23 13
33 1
08:30
22 7
33 4
08:45
14 5
82 39
17 3
113
12 195
51 09:00
19 8
12 4
09:15
11 3
18 2
09:30
9 7
17 0
09:45
6 2
45 20
12 4
59 10
104
30 10:00
17 5
21 3
10:15
12 2
17 0
10:30
25 3
19 0
10:45
22 1
76 11
23 0
80 3
156
14 11:00
20 2
22 0
11:15
16 0
23 0
11:30
28 1
23 2
11:45
16 0
80 31
15 0
83 2
163
5 Total
365
773
480
532
845
1305
Percent

32.1 %

67.9%

47.4%

52.6%

39.3%

60.7%
Grand
365
773
480
532
845
1305
Total
Percent

32.1%

67.9%

47.4%

52.6%

39.3%

60.7%
ADT ADT 2,150 AADT 2,150

FMAkt»vi-WE"
Survey Equipment
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

Survey Equipment Used
The radar equipment used by City Traffic Counters to collect speed measurements for this survey was a Stalker -II SDR Model Hand -Held Traffic Radar and a Stalker-ATR Model Hand -Held Traffic Radar both manufactured by Applied Concepts of Plano, Texas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Stalker -II SDR Hand -Held Traffic Radar and Stalker-ATR Model Hand - Held Traffic Radar were last calibrated on January 16, 2023 by Southern California Radar/Laser Certification Laboratory.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RADAR/LASER

CERTIFICATION LABORATORY
P.O. Box 1177
Pine Valley, CA 91962
I certify that the Stalker ATR Radar, Serial Number 71888 was tested on January 16, 2023, and was calibrated to be within the Manufacturers specifications for accuracy and stability.
• Unit meets or exceeds the NHTSA standards for accuracy. • Unit is listed on the NHTSA/ IACP Conforming Product List. • Unit tests meet or exceed the standards set forth in cvc 40802().

Test Results
Test
Min
Max
Read
Pass
Visual/Function
_
_
_
Yes
Tuning Rork
-.5%
+.5%
4166 Hz
Yes
Frequency
120341 & 227227
Radar Device Tuning
-1MPH
+1MPH
N/A
Yes
Fork
Microwave Frequency
-100MHz
+ 100MHz

34.735GHz
Yes
— Ka -Band
Radiated Output
-1.5dB
+ 1.5dB
+.01
Yes
Power Variation
Antenna Horizontal
_
100
101)
Yes
Bandwidth Ka -Band
Low Voltage supply

5.7 7.3V

6.1 Yes
Accuracy -Stationary
-2MPH
+1MPH
0 Yes
Mode
Accuracy -Moving
-2MPH
+2MPH
N/A
-
Mode
Target Channel
www.SoCalRadar-laserCertificationLab.com

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RADAR/LASES`

CERTIFICATION LABORATORY
P.O. Box 1177
Pine Valley, CA 91962
I certify that the Stalker ATR Radar, Serial Number 71888 was tested on January 16, 2023, and was calibrated to be within the Manufacturers specifications for accuracy and stability.
• Unit meets or exceeds the NHTSA standards for accuracy. • Unit is listed on the NHTSA/IACP Conforming Product List. • Unit tests meet or exceed the standards set forth in cvc 40802().

Test Results
Test
Min
Max
Read
Pass
Visual/Function
_
_
-
Yes
Tuning Fork
-, rj%
+.5%
4166 Hz
Yes
Frequency
120341&.227227
Radar Device Tuning
-1MPH
+1MPH
N/A
Yes
Fork
Microwave Frequency
-100MHz
+100MHz

34.735GHz
Yes
— Ka -Band
Radiated Output
-1.5dB
+ 1.5dB
+.01
Yes
Power Variation
Antenna Horizontal
_
100
100
Yes
Bandwidth Ka -Band
Low Voltage Supply

5.7 7.3V

6.1 Yes
Accuracy -Stationary
-2MPH
+1MPH
0 Yes
Mode
Accuracy -Moving
-2MPH
+2MPH
N/A
-
Mode
Target Channel
www.SoCalRadar-laserCertificationLab.com

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RADAR/]LASER

CERTIFICATION LABORATORY
P.G. Box 1177
Pine Valley, CA 91962
I certify that the Stalker SDR Radar, Serial Number AS002077 was tested on January 16, 2023, and was calibrated to be within the Manufacturers specifications for accuracy and stability.
• Unit meets or exceeds the NHTSA standards for accuracy. • Unit is listed on the IACP Conforming Product List.
• Unit tests meet or exceed the standards set forth in cvc 408020.

Test Results
Test
Min
Max
Read
Pass
Visual/Function
_
_
_
Yes
Tuning Fork
5%
+.5%
+.00 & .00
Yes
Frequency
Radar Tuning Fork
_IMPH
+ 1 MPH
0 Yes
303112
Microwave
-100MHz
+IOOMHz

34.734 GHz
Yes
Frequency — Ka -
Band
Radiated Output
_ 1.5dB
+1.5dB
+.01
Yes
Power Variation
Antenna Horizontal
_
14°
100
Yes
Bandwidth Ka -Band
Low Voltage Supply
_

10.8V

10.8 Yes
Accuracy -Stationary
-2MPH
+1MPH
0 Yes
Mode
Accuracy -Moving
-2MPH
+2MPH
0 Yes
Mode
Target Channel
www.SoCalRadar-laserCertificationLab.com

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RADAR/;LASER

CERTIFICATION LABORATORY
P.O. Box 1177
Pine Valley, CA 91962
I certify that the Stalker SDR Radar, Serial Number AS002077 was tested on January 16, 2023, and was calibrated to be within the Manufacturers specifications for accuracy and stability.
• Unit meets or exceeds the NHTSA standards for accuracy. • Unit is listed on the IACP Conforming Product List.
• Unit tests meet or exceed the standards set forth in cvc 408020.

Test Results
Test
Min
Max
Read
Pass
Visual/Function
_
_
-
Yes
Tuning Fork
_ rj%
+.5%
+.00 85.00
Yes
Fre uenev
Radar Tuning Fork
-1MPH
+1MPH
0 Yes
303112
Microwave
- IOOMHz
+100MHz

34.734 GHz
Yes
Frequency — Ka -
Band
Radiated Output
-1.5dB
+1.5dB
+.01
Yes
Power Variation
Antenna Horizontal
_
140
100
Yes
Bandwidth Ka -Band
Low Voltage Supply
_

10.8V

10.8 Yes
Accuracy -Stationary-
-2MPH
+1MPH
0 Yes
Mode
Accuracy -Moving
-2MPH
4-2MPH
0 Yes
Mode
Target Channel
< 1 OdB (35-

2.4dB
Yes
Sensitivity
90 MPH
Antenna Near Field
_
OdBm/Cm2
-21.35dBm/Cm2
Yes
Maximum Power
Density
25 MPH
-2MPH
+1MPH
25 MPH
Yes
so MPH
-2MPH
+1MPH
50 MPH
Yes
65 MPH
-2MPH
+1MPH
65 MPH
Yes
This unit teas thnroughly tested for accuracy using NHTSA and The l7ri einal of this document has an embussed seal over the sie_nan e Mamufacturets test methcn" whth equipment specificallc designed and NJ It tOensttfe precision measurements under canrrolled conditions_ 1 his uni t passed all appkab[e tests and is hereby certified to operate within the manufacturer's specifications and to conform to NHTSA —lards to be a,c rate m he measurement of the Sneed of ant chief, I certify (or declare) and the pe alty of perjury under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing is true and correct
By: Date: January 16, 2023
William F. Dunable, MS/CIS, FCC Lie, 4 PG- 1lSD-2354
Serving Law Enforcement Since 1995
www_ SoCalRadar-laserCertificationLab.com

F_1]aviM13D
Legislative References
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code
The following sections of the CVC are from the most recently published CVC as of August 2023 and contain new sections pertaining to AB 43.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys
Section 627.
(a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

Basic Speed Law
Section 22350.

No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.

The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.

Section 22357.1.

Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.

Section 22358.4
(a)
(1) Wherever a local authority determines upon the basis on an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority my, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected up on the highway.
(1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior and after the school zone.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5)
(A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For the purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at a distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from school grounds.

Business Activity Districts
Section 22358.9.
(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the flowing conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a "business activity district" is that a portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citation for violation of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Minimum and Maximum Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.

Section 22358.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Section 22358.3.

Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

Section 22360.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the speed limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a highway other than a state highway for a distance of not exceeding 2,000 feet in length between district, either business or residence, the local authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie limit thereon lower than 65 mile per hour, but not less than 25 miles per hour, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street or highway.

Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.

It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Safety Corridors (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.7.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one -fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) A portion of the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(3) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government code, whichever is sooner.
(4) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Maintaining Posted Speeds (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.8.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.

With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Speed Trap Prohibition
Section 40801.

No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

Speed Trap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:

Z
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road System Maps," that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a "local street or road" if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

(c)
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign.
(3) For purposes of this section, "senior zone" means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SENIOR" warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, "business activity district" means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour of 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)
(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:

Except as specified in subdause (II), seven years.
(II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Speed Trap Evidence
Section 40803.
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.

When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

WW I LLDAN
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
www.wilidan.com

Item No. 14

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 27, 2026
SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report.

The following are the highlights for Community Development for the months of November and December 2025.

CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
In November and December 2025, Planning has processed eighty (82) new applications (not including Home Occupations) and five (5) Public Hearings were conducted. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report.

Planning Statistics
Novembcr
Dmcmbor
LonE RanEe
9 9
Accessory Dwelling Unit
1 0
Conditional Use Permit
0 1
Extension of Time
1 0
Manage Permits
S
1=
Modifications
12 5
Pre -Applications
2 Temporary Use Permit
3 3
Tobacco Shop Permits
3 5
Vendor License
0 1
Wifele�� Penns Facility
1 1
oning letter
2 0
l
42 40
Rancho-12 Tentative Tract Map (PA22-0047): The City is processing a 12-lot single-family development located at 31670 Rancho California Road. (JONES)
-1-

Be Good Hotel (PA22-0995): The City is processing a Development Plan Application to review a four- story hotel featuring nine rooms, restaurant, and subterranean parking. The project is generally located on the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Mercedes Street. (CARDENAS) Redhawk Specific Plan Amendment (PA23-0327): The City is processing an amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan to provide a revision to uses associated with the golf course and add related standards for those uses. The project is located at 45100 Temecula Parkway within the Redhawk Specific Plan (related Planning Application number PA23-0251 CUP). (JONES)
Front and Main (PA23-0492): The City is processing a Development Plan application for an approximately 13,600 square foot structure totaling three -stories. The project is generally located approximately 130 feet east of the Old Town Front Street and Main Street intersection at APN 922-034-037. (CARDENAS) Cubesmart AT&T Wireless Antenna Facility (PA22-0470): The City is processing a Wireless Antenna Facility application for a proposed 40' tall mono -eucalyptus tree located behind the existing CubeSmart Self Storage facility located at 44618 Pechanga Parkway. (CARDENAS) Tony's Car Wash (PA23-0321): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a proposed 6,828 square -foot car wash facility consisting of a car wash tunnel, detailing tunnel, an office, and vacuums on the vacant 1.99-acre property located approximately 200 feet southwest of Temecula Parkway and Jedediah Smith Road. (CARDENAS)
Vertical Bridge WAF (PA23-0351): The City of processing a Wireless Antenna Facility Application (Conditional Use Permit) for a new 77-foot wireless tower facility and associated ground equipment at the Redhawk Golf Course open space area between Camino Rubi and Corte Mislanca. (CARDENAS) Small Steps Industrial (PA24-0180): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a proposed 8,000 square foot industrial building on the vacant .59-acre parcel located on the northwest corner of Felix Valdez Avenue and Baldaray Circle. (CARDENAS)
MS Mountain View Building 17 (PA24-0246): The City is processing a Development Plan application for Building 17, a 69,095 square foot building located on the west of the corner of Via Industria and Avenida Alvarado. (CARDENAS)
Elderberry Park Recreation Center and HPR (PA25-0163 & 0168): The City is processing architectural plans for a private recreation center with ancillary amenities and six (6) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 164 lots for a new residential tract development at Specific Plan Paloma Del Sol. (MARQUEZ & COOPER)
Black Rock Coffee MOD: a Modification Application (Major) for a future 735 square foot coffee shop with a drive through on the 0.94-acre parcel located at 43995 Mahlon Vail Road. (CARDENAS) Butterfield Stage Residential: A Planned Development Overlay (PA25-0232), Tentative Tract Map (PA25-0230), and a Development Plan (PA25-0231) to allow for a 158-unit single-family market rate residential project. Units will range in size from 1,615 to 2,434 square feet. The project is generally located on the northeast corner of Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road. (JONES) -2-

Temecula Town Center Residential: PA25-0331, a General Plan Amendment to remove Table LU-6 from the Land Use Element (Mixed Use Overlays); PA25-0332, a Development Plan to review 85 attached townhomes within 14 structures. Each structure is three stories; PA25-0333, a Tentative Tract Map to reconfigure an existing parcel to allow for an attached residential project. (JONES)

LONG RANGE PLANNING
General Plan Update: The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four -phase, multi -year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements.

Phase I also included an update to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City's GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City's Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City's remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The RFP for the General Plan managing consultant was awarded to Sagecrest Environmental (Contract approved January 28, 2025). The RFP for the General Plan consultant was released and interviews held with the top applicants the week of April 28, 2025. The selection committee chose De Novo Planning Group to lead the General Plan effort. The contract was approved by the City Council on May 27, 2025. A General Plan visioning workshop is being held in each of the five Council Districts, and the fist GPAC meeting was held on October 9, 2025, at the Conference Center. (PETERS) Local Hazard Mitigation Plan AB 2140 Compliance (LR25-0056): A proposed City Council Resolution to include reference to the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) in compliance with AB2140. The proposed resolution would reduce the City's costs in circumstances where FEMA declares an emergency. Staff is working with the City Attorney's office to ensure documents comply with both state and federal requirements. (COLLINS)
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment (LR19-1458): An amendment to the Uptown Specific Plan to implement the following changes: modify graphics to reflect consistency with text regarding allowable frontage types, amend street cross sections (graphics), amend plant pallet and silva cell requirements for street trees, implement a street naming convention, amend streetlight spacing and other typographical errors.

Staff has reached out to Spurlock Consulting for assistance in updating the Sidewalk and Streetscape Standards and is awaiting a scope of work and timeline. Public Works is drafting new street sections for the Specific Plan. Spurlock Consulting has provided a scope of work for the proposed changes to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Standards and staff has executed the agreement for services and will begin updating the graphics as requested. Planning and Traffic Engineering have been working on updated street cross sections and a map to identify cross section placements. (JONES) Wayfinding Guide (LR23-0167/LR24-0344): The City was working with a consultant, Alta Planning + Design, Inc., to implement a bicycle wayfinding system for the bike lanes and trails throughout the city. The Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan that was adopted in 2016 will act as an implementation and style guide to create an interconnected network designed to encourage more residents to use active transportation. Alta drafted a wayfinding strategy memo that outlines best practices for destination selection, sign placement, and sign programming in 2024, however, for ease of production and cost purposes, staff decided to open a contract with Brand Assassins to finish out the project. A kickoff meeting with Brand Assassins was held in February 2025 and designs are underway. Staff and the consultant presented a draft design to the City Council Trails/Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee on May 13, 2025. Staff has been -3-

working with the consultant on finalizing a design based off of the feedback received. A project update meeting with the City Council Trails/Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee will be held on January 13, 2026. (GARCIA)
SB 1186 (LR24-0090): A draft Ordinance has been prepared to implement the requirements of SB 1186.

This item is scheduled to be heard at the Planning Commission Meeting on October 15, 2025, and City Council on November 18, 2025. The City Council tabled the item and requested additional research be completed on the subject and to bring it back at a future date. (COLLINS) Old Town Parking Sensors (LR22-0857): The project is a continuation of the Old Town Parking White Paper that discussed various technology solutions designed to track and report on parking in Old Town in real time. The white paper recommended that the City utilize parking sensors to monitor parking in Old Town. Staff has circulated a Request for Proposal from companies offering parking sensors. Responses were received and reviewed by staff. The companies that submitted the top two highest rated proposals were invited to provide a demonstration to staff. Demonstrations were held in April and a vendor was selected (Frogparking, Inc.). The agreement for the Frogparking Sensors was taken to City Council on November 12, 2024. Sensor installation for the pilot program (Phase I) was completed on February 11, 2025. The pilot covered parallel parking spaces along Old Town Front Street between Main Street and the northern entry arch. On August 5, 2025, staff made a presentation to the City Council Old Town Steering Committee updating them on the results seen during the pilot program. Staff also discussed with the committee their thoughts on bringing before the entire council a recommendation to move forward with Phase II of the project. The subcommittee was in favor of this idea. Implementation of Phase II was presented to the City Council on October 28, 2025 for consideration. The City Council approved moving forward with Phase II.

Installation is anticipated to occur in January or February of 2026. (JONES) Election Sign Ordinance (LR25-0123): A proposed Ordinance to provide standards related to the governance of election signage throughout the City. The proposed Ordinance was recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission on October 15, 2025, and the City Council adopted the Ordinance on November 18, 2025 and is now in effect. (JONES)
Private Paid Parking in Old Town (LR25-0295) — Staff will meet with the Old Town Sterring Subcommittee on January 22, 2026, for direction related to ongoing concerns surrounding privately owned parking lots within Old Town. (COLLINS)
Kratom (LR25-0438) — An update to Chapter 8.56 of the Municipal Code to prohibit the sale of kratom products containing greater than 2% of the active alkaloids. Item is scheduled for public hearing before the City Council on January 131h, 2026. (COLLINS)
Animal Ordinance Amendment (LR25-0387) — An ordinance amending Title 6 (Animals) of the Municipal Code to reduce the setback requirement for animal keeping (housing) structures from 75 feet from a neighboring property line to 25 feet. Item is scheduled for public hearing before the City Council on January 27th, 2026. (COLLINS)
Shopping Cart Ordinance Amendment (LR25-0444) — An ordinance amending Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals and Welfare) of the Municipal Code to implement the requirements of SB 753 which amends the fees City's may charge for shopping cart recovery among other changes. Staff is working to identify needed changes and will bring forward an ordinance for subcommittee review in the near future. (COLLINS) -4-

Annual General Plan Progress Report (LR26-0004) — Annual progress report to the California Office of Planning & Research (OPR) detailing the City's annual progress of implementing its adopted General Plan.

Item is slated to go to Planning Commission (Government Code § 65402 and § 65403) as a business item on March 41h, 2026 and is due to OPR by April 1st, 2026. (COLLINS) Annual Housing Element Progress Report (LR26-0005) — Annual progress report to the California Office of Housing & Community Development (HCD) detailing the City's annual progress of implementing its adopted Housing Element. Item is due to HCD by April 1st, 2026. (COLLINS) California Department of Finance Annual Housing Unit Report (LR26-0006) — Annual progress report to the California Department of Finance (CDF) detailing the City's annual progress of implementing its adopted Housing Element. Item is due to CDF by April 1st, 2026. (COLLINS) Annual Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance Report (LR26-0007) — Annual progress report to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) detailing the City's annual progress of implementing its adopted Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). Item is due to DWR by April 1st, 2026. (COLLINS)
Annual Municipal Code MX Ordinance (LR26-0008) — An annual effort to "cleanup" the municipal code by adopting an ordinance to correct minor errors, omissions, and clarify policy that have been identified as deficient. Staff is presently working to correct these errors and ensure the municipal code is a useful and up to date document. (COLLINS)

HOUSING
Uptown Temecula Request for Proposal (RFP): The City has been working closely with the Supportive Housing and Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee to create a draft RFP for the City owned vacant land parcel located in Uptown Temecula. The RFP was made live on June 4, 2025. The City received six (6) proposals -5-

that are currently under review. The parcel is right next to the French Valley off ramp headed south on the I-15 Freeway and it is planned to be used for an affordable housing project. (URIAS)

BUILDING & SAFETY
Building and Safety statistics for November and December 2025 are highlighted in the following table.

Building & Safety Statistics l November) December
Permits
275
244
New Single Family Units
Accessory Di elluig Units (.3,DU)
0 1
New GadnmercW Building
� 1
rA Photovoltaic - olaPP+ �t�t pm=)
42 36
Photovoltaic (taudardlExpedited)
21 Tenant Impro� ement
9 11
Non Construction G of 0
Dumber of Active Plan Checks

12.3 147
Number of New Plan Checks
38 Number ofFimaled Permits
198
155
Inspections
1875
2326
Inspections Per Day
110
�116
Inspections Per Persan Per Day
22 _
23 Stops Per IvImffi
570
653
Visitors to Counter
580
Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy
❑ JWJ Construction Service Inc. (3,091 SF)
❑ UNTUCKit — Promenade Mall (1,051 SF)
❑ Cowboys and Sons (12,411 SF)
Tenant Improvement
❑ Hook & Cleaver Ranch - (1,535 SF)
❑ Tabu Sushi (3,165 SF)
❑ Gaucho Grill (3,288 SF)

CODE ENFORCEMENT
During the months of November and December, Code Enforcement responded to 100 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 166 code cases, conducted 646 regular inspections, and forwarded 3 referrals.

Code Enforcement Statistics November Demmber
Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 3 ?
Vacant Home:: Prop. Maintenance !Infestation.Mold 9
Business or Home Occupation w o license. CUP 3 13
Trash and Debris. Dumping 6
Overgrown Vegetation: Weeds.." Fire H2=d 7 4
Green Pool l Vector Control / Stagnant ?
GrafF6 7 is
vNuisance,'Atvmal Control
!r . Rl' Stored Boat. Parking 3 4
ruction w/o PermitBmkImg Cade 4
each Public ROW. Trash Cans 16 3
rglSigns 5
Safety & Health 4 5
Number of Cases s0
Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties.

Foreclosure Statistics I
sidential - Default
sidenotiai - Foreclosure
sideniial - REO
Total - Residential
racial -
Defaoult
racial -
Foreclosure
racial -
REO
Total
- Commercial
ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report
39 1 44
14 1 15
31 25
-7-

PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA25-0411 28835 Single Oak Dr 921-020-040 Marcella Mills 11/03/2025 Anthony Williams Millipore Sigma Chemicon PL Modifications Out Temecula, CA 92590
International Inc.

Case Title / Description: Single Oak Drive MOD: a Modification Application for the addition of an approximately 211 square foot equipment enclosure to house a liquid nitrogen tank on the side of an existing building located at 28835 Single Oak Drive.

PA25-0412 42024 Avenida Alvarado 909-252-002 Marcella Mills 11/04/2025 11/06/2025 Mary Ayers A/E West Christie Prop PLZoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92590
Consultants, Inc Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: Avenida Alvarado ZL: a Zoning Letter Request for the property located at 42024, 42030, and 42660 Avenida Alvarado (APNs: 909-252-002 and 909-252-011).

PA25-0414 27445 Jefferson Ave 909-240-005 Yannin Marquez 11/05/2025 Gabriela Marks Hilbert Group PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: Del Taco Exterior Update MOD: A Modification Application to modify the elevations originally entitled under PA23-0498. The changes are to remove the pick-up lockers from the south elevation and replace it with paint color PX-1. The restaurant is located at 27445 Jefferson Avenue.

PA25-0415 26471 Ynez Rd 910-300-016 Marcella Mills 11/05/2025 12/18/2025 Sherrie Munroe PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: At Home DCDA MOD: a Modification Application to move an existing DCDA vault above ground at the commercial property located at 26471 Ynez Road.

PA25-0417 41221 Margarita Rd 921-830-001 Yannin Marquez 11/06/2025 Glen Brouwer Tributary LA, BEL VILLAGIO PL Modifications Applied Temecula, CA 92591
Inc.

Case Title / Description: Bel Villagio Landscape MOD: A Modification Application (Planning Review Only) for landscape renovation of the Bel Villagio shopping center. The shopping center is adjacent to the Promenade Mall that includes 41221-41577 Margarita Road.

PA25-0418 27146 Majello Ct 920-021-024 Yannin Marquez 11/06/2025 Tammy McManus Raymond PLAccessory Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Lanzilotta Dwelling Unit
Case Title / Description: Lanzillotta Residence ADU: An Accessory Dwelling Unit application for an 898.9 sq. ft. detached accessory dwelling unit located at the rear of the existing primary residence of 27146 Majello Court.

Page 1 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner
Plan Type Status
PA25-0421 45100 Redhawk Pky 962-040-012 Eric Jones 11/10/2025 Randy Wood
Rainbow Bridge
PL Temporary Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Management
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Redhawk Golf Course Wedding/Event Center TUP: A Temporary Use Permit to allow the Redhawk Golf course to conduct weddings and similar events at an existing outdoor pavilion. The project is located at 54100 Temecula Parkway.

PA25-0423 41784 Green Tree Rd 955-050-037 Yannin Marquez 11/12/2025 Lisa Platts
Lisa Platts
PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: Platts Residence Urban Lot Split S139 MOD: A Modification Application to adjust one segment of the proposed lot line that splits the two lots by shifting it approximately 18' northwest. The revision removes approximately 0.02 acres from Lot 1 and adds it to Lot 2. The project is located at 41784 Green Tree Road.

PA25-0424 40525 Winchester Rd 910-290-011 Marcella Mills 11/12/2025 David Garmo
Orlansky Family
PL Modifications Out
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Big O Tires Paint MOD: a Modification Application for a paint scheme change at Big O Tires located at 40525 Winchester Road.

PA25-0426 41915 3Rd St 922-044-018 Marcella Mills 11/12/2025 Pablo Mora
41915 3rd Street
PL Zoning or Cancelled
Temecula, CA 92590
Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: 41915 3rd Street ZL: a Zoning Letter Request for the property located at 41915 3rd Street (APN: 922-044-018).

PA25-0427 39826 Winchester Rd 920-100-042 Marcella Mills 11/12/2025 Sirma Saddiq
LIPT
PL Modifications Out
Temecula, CA 92591

WINCHESTER

ROAD INC
Case Title / Description: Navy Federal Drive-Thru MOD: a Modification Application to install a new drive-thru ATM at an existing Navy Federal Credit Union located at 39826 Winchester Road.

PA25-0428 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-019 11/12/2025 12/09/2025 Paul Del Bene
RANCHO
PL Wireless Approved
Temecula, CA 92592

BAPTIST
Antenna Facility
CHURCH
Case Title / Description: Avocado WAF MOD: a Wireless Antenna Facility Modification Application to remove and replace three (3) RRUs at an existing wireless facility located at 29775 Rancho Santiago Road.

PA25-0429 28677 Old Town Front St, 1 922-045-033 Yannin Marquez 11/12/2025 Shahid Waheed Linda Lash PL Tobacco Approved Temecula, CA 92590
Shop Permits
Case Title / Description: Sunny Vaporz Smoke Shop TSP: ATobacco Shop Permit (Renewal) for Sunny Vaporz Smoke Shop located at 28677 Old Town Front Street, Suite I.

Page 2 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA25-0430 32125 Temecula Pky 960-010-044 Marcella Mills 11/13/2025 01/05/2026 Mark Watson COUNTY OF PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92592

RIVERSIDE
Case Title / Description: Bare Knuckle Brewing MOD: a Modification Application for Bare Knuckle Brewing Company to construct two free-standing patio covers to accommodate outdoor seating at 32125 Temecula Parkway, Suite C.

PA25-0433 32483 Temecula Pky 960-020-057 Yannin Marquez 11/17/2025 Fang Yuan Selwyn Ginsburg PL Massage Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Permits
Case Title / Description: Amazing Massage MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Amazing Massage located at 32483 Temecula Parkway, Suite E-118.

PA25-0434 32467 Temecula Pky, F101 960-020-058 Yannin Marquez 11/17/2025 Wenquan Liu ORIGO REAL PL Massage Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
ESTATE INV Permits
FUND
Case Title / Description: MC Thai Massage MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Change of Ownership) for MC Thai Massage located at 32467 Temecula Parkway, Suite F101.

PA25-0435 27192 Rainbow Creek Dr 920-042-004 Marcella Mills 11/18/2025 Mike Perkett Darrell West PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: West Residence Addition MOD: A Modification Application for a 69 square foot addition to the kitchen located on the south end of the existing primary residence. The residence is located at 27192 Rainbow Creek Drive.

PA25-0436 28910 Rancho California Rd, 921-060-024 Yannin Marquez 11/18/2025 Cathy Cai CRAIG NELSON PL Massage Approved
101
Permits
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: Dream Tree Spa Inc. MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Dream Tree Spa Inc. located at 28910 Rancho California Road, Unit 101.

PA25-0437 31669 Temecula Pky 961-080-006 Marcella Mills 11/19/2025 Meredith CHEVRON USA PL Modifications Out
Temecula, CA 92592
Locklear INC
Case Title / Description: Temecula Parkway Chevron Paint MOD: a Modification Application for a paint scheme change at the existing Extra Mile (Chevron) convenience store located at 31669 Temecula Parkway.

PA25-0439 42371 Maskuaz Ct 918-292-013 JaimeCardenas 11/19/2025 Patrick Romi Blalock PL Modifications Corrections
Temecula, CA 92592
Stambersky
Case Title / Description: Blalock Room Addition MOD: a Modification Application for a 467 bedroom addition and a 232 square foot covered patio at the rear of the existing single-family residence located at 42371 Maskuaz Court.

Page 3 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0440 41958 5Th St 922-033-005 Yannin Marquez 11/19/2025 Jill Nelson Donald Egizi PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Blackbird NYE TUP: a Major Temporary Use Permit for Blackbird Tavern to have a New Year's Eve celebration on December 31, 2025, from 9:00 PM to 2:00 AM, with live entertainment from 9:00 PM to 12:30 AM. Located at 41958 5th Street.

PA25-0443 27326 Jefferson Ave , 13 910-282-004 Yannin Marquez 11/21/2025 Robert Burnside
Plaza Temecula
PL Massage
Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Inc
Permits
Case Title / Description: Pacific Spa MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Pacific Spa located at 27326 Jefferson Avenue, Unit 13.

PA25-0445 28210 Jefferson Ave 921-060-058 Marcella Mills 11/24/2025 Anthony Yang
WELLPROFIT 5
PL Extension of
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Time
Case Title / Description: Firenze EOT: an Extension of Time application for a previously approved Development Plan (PA21-1023) for an approximately 562,220 square foot, 238-unit mixed use apartment and commercial project located approximately 665 feet north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue (APN: 921-060-058)
PA25-0446 27636 Ynez Rd , L-3 921-320-041 Yannin Marquez 11/24/2025 Emadel Shalabi
Ynez Shops
PL Tobacco
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Shop Permits
Case Title / Description: Vibez Smoke Shop TSP: A Tobacco Shop Permit (Renewal) for Vibez Smoke Shop located at 27636 Ynez Road, Unit L-3
PA25-0447 27309 Madison Ave 910-272-033 Jaime Cardenas 11/24/2025 Joseph Kilcoyne
Kaiser
PL Modifications
Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Foundation
Health
Case Title / Description: Kaiser HVAC Screen Wall MOD: a Modification Application for the installation of a new parapet screen wall to conceal rooftop mechanical equipment of the Kaiser medical building located at 27309 Madison Avenue.

PA25-0448 30650 Rancho California Rd , 921-700-016 Yannin Marquez 11/24/2025 Bharat Patel
Elina
PL Tobacco
Approved
D403
Covarrubias
Shop Permits
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Temecula Smoke Shop TSP: A Tobacco Shop Permit (Renewal) for Temecula Smoke Shop located at 30650 Rancho California Road, Unit D403.

PA25-0449 28999 Old Town Front St, 206 922-110-038 Yannin Marquez 11/25/2025 Sam Visnic
Stewart Group
PL Massage
Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Release Muscle Therapy MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (change of location) for Release Muscle Therapy located at 28999 Old Town Front Street, Unit 206

Page 4 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0450 30661 Temecula Pky 961-410-032 Yannin Marquez 11/25/2025 SAMERA Apex Imaging Paul Hansen PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92592 SIDDIQI Services Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Discount Tires Temporary Facilities TUP: A Temporary Use Permit to allow temporary facilities that includes (2) mobile office, ADA compliant restroom trailers, a connex container and a dumpster from 9/22/25 to 12/22/25. The temporary facilities are located at the parking lot of 30661 Temecula Parkway.

PA25-0451 27725 Jefferson Ave , 106 921-400-031 Yannin Marquez 11/26/2025 Shuwei Collier Shuwei Collier
PL Massage
Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Blue Water Massage MEP (Renewal): A Massage Establishment Permit Application (renewal) for Blue Water Massage located at 27725 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 106.

PA25-0452 27574 Commerce Center Dr 921-400-064 Yannin Marquez 11/26/2025 Coastline Equity
PL Massage
Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Ivy Spa MEP (Renewal): a Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Ivy Spa located at 27574 Commerce Center Drive, Suite 138
PA25-0453 27546 Ynez Rd 921-320-052 Yannin Marquez 11/26/2025 Tom Ingle Tom Ingle
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Permits
Case Title / Description: Image Studios Temecula MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (renewal) for Extended Images T & C LLC, a building composted of salon suites located at 27546 Ynez Road.

PA25-0455 27393 Ynez Rd , 252 921-260-018 Yannin Marquez 12/01/2025 Carol Campbell MCS TOWER
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
PLAZA
Permits
Case Title / Description: Fusion Therapeutic Massage MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Fusion Therapeutic Massage located at 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 252.

PA25-0456 940-320-017 Marcella Mills 12/01/2025 01/05/2026 Brookfield Brookfield SB ALTAIR
PL Temporary
Approved
Temecula, CA
Properties Properties
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Altair Housing Construction Trailer TUP: a Temporary Use Permit to allow for a temporary housing construction trailer on -site from through July 2026, adjacent to the existing land construction trailer for Altair (APN: 940-320-017).

PA25-0458 43030 Argo Ct 945-240-006 Marcella Mills 12/02/2025 Adrian Cisneros Jennifer
PL Modifications
Out
Temecula, CA 92592
Opdycke
Case Title / Description: Opdycke Residence MOD: a Modification Application for the approximately 191 square foot addition to an existing residence located at 43030 Argo Court.

PA25-0459 40820 Winchester Rd , K07 910-420-030 Yannin Marquez 12/03/2025 Hong Luo Temecula Towne
PL Massage
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Center Assoc
Permits
Case Title / Description: Pure Massage MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Pure Massage located at 40820 Winchester Road, Suite K07.

Page 5 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0460 40820 Winchester Rd , 2296 910-420-030 Yannin Marquez 12/03/2025 Hong Luo Temecula Towne PL Massage Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Center Assoc Permits
Case Title / Description: Pure Massage MEP: A Massage Permit for Pure Massage located at 40820 Winchester Road, Suite 2296.

PA25-0461 28165 Jefferson Ave , C 921-060-016 Yannin Marquez 12/03/2025 Lie Fu Sun
Paul Ryan
PL Massage Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Tang Yun Asian Spa LLC MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Tang Yun Asian Spa LLC located at 28165 Jefferson Avenue, Unit C.

PA25-0462 27895 Diaz Rd 921-040-010 Marcella Mills 12/05/2025 Edgar Negrete

TEMECULA
PL Vendor Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590

MASONIC
License

TEMPLE ASSN
Case Title / Description: Hot Diggity Dog Outdoor VL: an Outdoor Vendor License application for Hot Diggity Dog to operate a stationary hot dog cart Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, located at 27895 Diaz Road.

PA25-0463 42200 Margarita Rd 954-020-006 Marcella Mills 12/05/2025 Jason Hayes
Ventana Prop
PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: Margarita Summit Solar MOD: a Modification Application for the addition of 30 solar panels to Building #1 and 40 panels to Buildings #1, 4, 6, and 9, at an existing apartment complex located at 42200 Margarita Road.

PA25-0467 44066 Margarita Rd , 2 959-090-015 Yannin Marquez 12/08/2025 Leslie Khashan
Redhawk
PL Tobacco Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Properties LLC
Shop Permits
Case Title / Description: Speedy's Smoke and Vape Shop #3 MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Speedy's Smoke and Vape Shop #3 located at 44066 Margarita Road, Unit 2.

PA25-0469 30182 Milano Rd 919-384-007 Marcella Mills 12/09/2025 John Bryan
John Bryan
PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Bryan Residence MOD: a Modification Application for an approximately 54 square foot addition to an existing residence located at 30182 Milano Road.

PA25-0471 27453 Jefferson Ave 909-240-001 Yannin Marquez 12/12/2025 PL Tobacco Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Shop Permits
Case Title / Description: The Glass Warehouse TSP: Tobacco Shop Permit (renewal) for The Glass Warehouse located at 27453 Jefferson Avenue

Page 6 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0472 27901 Jefferson Ave 921-050-003 Marcella Mills 12/15/2025 Samantha Daniel PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Romero Henderson Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Hendo's Fight Night TUP: a Temporary Use Permit (Major) for Hendo's Fight Night on January 24, 2026 from 11:00 AM to 8:00 PM, and April 18, 2026, June 20, 2026, August 15, 2026, and November 14, 2026 from 1:00 PM to 10:00 PM. There is alcohol under a Type 74 ABC License proposed at this event. The address is 27901 Jefferson Avenue.

PA25-0473 41955 4Th St 922-033-022 Marcella Mills 12/15/2025 Yaann Bounat

BURKE FAMILY
PL Conditional
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590

TRUST DTD
Use Permit
1 /28/22
Case Title / Description: Le Bistro Type 47 CUP: a Conditional Use Permit application for Le Bistro Modern to obtain an ABC Type 47 license (On Sale General - Eating Place) at a new restaurant located at 41955 4th Street, Suite 101.

PA25-0474 28120 Jefferson Ave , 8-201 921-060-032 Yannin Marquez 12/15/2025 Ying Yang
JEAN
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590

DOMENIGONI
Permits
Case Title / Description: Spa Rejuv (YY) LLC MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Spa Rejuv (YY) LLC located at 28120 Jefferson Avenue Unit B-201.

PA25-0475 31741 Temecula Pky, , B 961-080-022 Yannin Marquez 12/15/2025 Xucheng Gao
New Plan Excel
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
Realty Trust Inc.

Permits
Case Title / Description: Temecula Massage MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit for Temecula Massage (Renewal) located at 31741 Temecula Parkway, Unit B.

PA25-0476 27715 Jefferson Ave , 201 921-400-024 Yannin Marquez 12/16/2025 Hilda Reyes

JEFFERSON
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590

PLAZA CENTER
Permits
Case Title / Description: Ethereal Day Spa 1 MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Ethereal Day Spa 1 located at 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Unit 201.

PA25-0477 41935 Humber Dr 921-511-001 Marcella Mills 12/17/2025 JOSHUA
JOSHUA
PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
SHARFI
SHARFI
Case Title / Description: Sharfi Residence MOD: a Modification Application for the approximately 581 square foot addition to an existing residence located at 41935 Humber Drive.

PA25-0478 41125 Winchester Rd , 133-13 910-281-003 Yannin Marquez 12/17/2025 Feras Qumseya
EHG Associates
PL Tobacco
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
LLC
Shop Permits
Case Title / Description: Smoke Express Corp TSP: A Tobacco Shop Permit (Renewal) for Smoke Express Corp located at 41125 Winchester Road, Unit B3-B.

Page 7 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner
Plan Type
Status
PA25-0479 27911 Jefferson Ave , 103 921-050-012 Yannin Marquez 12/17/2025 Jostaf Jirjees
Los Amigos
PL Tobacco
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Center
Shop Permits
Case Title / Description: High Sky Smoke Shop TSP: A Tobacco Shop Permit (Renewal) for High Sky Smoke Shop located at 27911 Jefferson Avenue, Unit 103.

PA25-0480 31741 Temecula Pky, , D 961-080-022 Yannin Marquez 12/17/2025 Shalini Khullar
New Plan Excel
PL Tobacco
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
Realty Trust Inc.

Shop Permits
Case Title / Description: Smoke Shop TSP: A Tobacco Shop Permit (Renewal) for Smoke Shop located at 31741 Temecula Parkway, Unit D.

PA25-0482 41669 Winchester Rd , 102 909-282-014 Yannin Marquez 12/19/2025 YueLong Tan
YueLong Tan
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Relax Zone Massage MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit (renewal) for Relax Zone Massage located at 41669 Winchester Road, Suite 102.

PA25-0484 31805 Temecula Pky 961-080-011 Yannin Marquez 12/23/2025 Mayette Serrano

GALILEO VAIL
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592

RANCH LP
Permits
Case Title / Description: Feel Better Massage & Bodywork: a Massage Establishment Permit Renewal for Feel Better Massage & Bodywork located at 31045 Temecula Parkway, Suite 205.

PA25-0485 27403 Ynez Rd 921-260-019 Yannin Marquez 12/23/2025

MCS TOWER
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
PLAZA
Permits
Case Title / Description: Sunshine Health Massage MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit Renewal for Sunshine Health located at 27403 Ynez Road, Suite 101.

PA25-0487 27403 Ynez Rd 921-260-019 Yannin Marquez 12/23/2025

MCS TOWER
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
PLAZA
Permits
Case Title / Description: Balance of Wellness MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit Renewal for Balance of Wellness located at 27403 Ynez Road, Suite 216.

PA25-0488 26780 Ynez Ct 921-750-009 Yannin Marquez 12/23/2025

MIKE & LEANN
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591

AZEVEDO
Permits

FAMILY LTD

PARTNERSHIP
Case Title / Description: Massage Poise MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit for Massage Poise located at 26780 Ynez Court, Suite B.

Page 8 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0491 28400 Rancho California Rd 921-020-041 Marcella Mills 12/29/2025 Ben Foust Verizon Temecula HHG PL Wireless Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Wireless Hotel Antenna Facility
Development, LP
Case Title / Description: Home2 Suites WAR a Wireless Antenna Facility application for anew wireless facility, including 2 FRP screen walls, 9 panel antennas, 3 remote radio units, 1 parabolic antenna, and related equipment on approximately 290.6 square feet of an existing hotel rooftop. Project located at 28400 Rancho California Road.

PA25-0492 28208 Via Somantano 916-760-001 Marcella Mills 12/29/2025 01/05/2026 Cailey Hollero
MERITAGE PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92591

HOMES OF
CALIF
Case Title / Description: Prado Product Placement MOD: a Modification Application to change the home product placement and to allow reduced side setbacks from 5 feet to 4 feet within the Prado housing development, originally approved under PA21-0838.

PA25-0493 27536 Ynez Rd , F-19 921-320-052 Yannin Marquez 12/30/2025 Jianxia Bao
PL Massage Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Permits
Case Title / Description: Massage by Sunny MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit (Renewal) for Massage by Sunny located at 27536 Ynez Road, Suite F-19.

PA25-0494 27727 Jefferson Ave 921-400-029 Marcella Mills 12/30/2025 Chelsea
OLD PL Temporary Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Freeman
JAYHWAWKER Use Permit
INV
Case Title / Description: Lionheart Gym Grand Opening TUP: a Temporary Use Permit for a Grand Opening event with vendors and a food truck on January 24, 2026 from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM located at 27727 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 102.

PREAPP25-0 921-720-016 Eric Jones 11/12/2025
Michael Long
CITY OF PL Plan Review
425 Temecula, CA
TEMECULA Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: DCT Fiber Hut Pre-App: A Pre -Application to review an inline amplification fiber hub facility for operation of a State-owned fiber optic network. The project consisting of 55'x45' fenced gravel compound with prefabricated equipment shelter, emergency backup generator and buried propane tank. The project is located on the northwest corner of the Ynez Road and Overland Drive intersection (APN:
921-720-016: City Owned Parcel).

PREAPP25-0 43525 Ridge Park Dr 940-330-004 Yannin Marquez 11/20/2025 Jiles Smith PL Cancelled 441 Temecula, CA 92590 Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Temecula Valley Fine Art Museum and Gallery CUP Pre-App: A Conditional Use Permit for an art museum and gallery located at 43525 Ridge Park Drive.

Page 9 of 10 ends

Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant PREAPP25-0 28999 Old Town Front St, 203 922-110-038 Yannin Marquez 12/10/2025 Jiles Smith 470 Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: Temecula Valley Fine Art Museum and Gallery CUP Pre-App: A Pre -Application for a Conditional Use Permit for an art museum and gallery located at 28999 Old Town Front Street, Suite 203.

PREAPP25-0 30559 Pauba Rd 945-070-006 Eric Jones 12/26/2025 489 Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: Pauba Road Pre-App: A Pre -Application to review mapping requirements for a proposed 4 parcel residential development. The project is located at APN 931-220-011.

Company Owner Plan Type Status
Stewart Group PL Completed
Pre -Application
William BEMBENEK B PL Cancelled
Bembenek FAMILY TRUST Pre -Application
DATED
06/16/2014

Page 10 of 10 ends

Item No. 15

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: John Crater, Division Chief
DATE: January 27, 2026
SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY: Tyren Hundley, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly Report for November and December 2025.

CITY OF TEMECULA
kc1VE,p&f'A FIRE DEPARTMENT
Operations Prevention Trainin Emer enc Mana ement
p � � g� g Y g
�TYPE
P,IL
Ines

NOVEMBER CALL BREAKDOWN

COMMERCIAL FIRE

MULTI -FAMILY FIRE O

RESIDENTIAL FIRE

WILDLAND FIRE D
VEHICLE FIRE 3
OTHER FIRE 3

RESCUE O
RINGING ALARM 2
FALSE ALARM 9O

HAZMAT O
TOTAL: 100
MONTHLY REPORT I NOVEMBER7025
EAR 1 2 Truck I I Squad
TYPE: #

TRAFFIC COLLISION
71 MEDICAL EMERGENCY
G18

OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
12 PUBLIC ASSIST
28 STANDBY
5 TOTAL: 734
Population - 112J94
NOVEMBER 2025
Other False Alarm
Fires
TC
Medical Emergencies
834
(7_1
e/,4, a
ISO Rating
2025 Year to Date
Calls
8,G70

CITY OF TEMECULA
kc1VE,p&f'A FIRE DEPARTMENT
Operations Prevention Trainin Emer enc Mana ement
p � � g� g Y g
Ines

DECEMBER CALL BREAKDOWN
TYPE
COMMERCIAL FIRE 1
MULTI -FAMILY FIRE 0
RESIDENTIAL FIRE 2
WILDLAND FIRE 3

VEHICLE FIRE

OTHER FIRE
RESCUE 4
RINGING ALARM 10
FALSE ALARM 91
HAZMAT 2
TOTAL: 115
MONTHLY REPORT I DECEMBER2025
EAR 1 2 Truck I I Squad
TYPE: #

TRAFFIC COLLISION
94 MEDICAL EMERGENCY
G97

OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
13 PUBLIC ASSIST
38 STANDBY
13 TOTAL: 855
Population - 112J94
DECEMBER 2D25
Other False Alarm
Fires
TC
Medical Emergencies
970
(7_1
e/,4, a
ISO Rating
2025 Year to Date
Calls
9,G40

Item No. 16

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Mark Rigali, Captain
DATE: January 27, 2026
SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (December 2025) PREPARED BY: Jeret McClellan, Sergeant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file monthly report.

ATTACHMENTS: Monthly Report

I

CAPTAIN MARK RIGALI
Oki :4 :111 9L
DECEMBER 2025
M
The report is dynamic in nature, and as such, each monthly report is compiled to take advantage of the Latest RMS information being entered at the station level.

As a result, crime totals will not be static from month to month.

PART 1 CRIMES
it
Part 1 Crime"
Homicide
November
0 December
0 Rape
2 0
Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
4 2
26 28
14 10
Vehicle Theft
23 23
Larceny Theft
95 152
Arson
1 1
I
w
18 14
= 0 — 1 =� 11
Burglary Larceny Theft

SQEJTHWal

RESPONSE
L��S,DE CoJ
City of Temecula
ResponseAverage
Priority 1

6.24 5.88
Priority 2

10.4 12.13
Priority 3

17.48 20.51
Priority 4

21.55 23.20
Priority 1: Involved circumstances that pose, or did pose in the immediate past, a clearly defined threat to human life or property, and which involve a high level of violence or the potentialfor serious injury.

Priority 2: Involve circumstances of an urgent, but not life -threatening nature. They are generally disturbances with a potential for violence, minor assaults and batteries, etc.

Priority 3: Involve circumstances that are neither urgent nor life -threatening.

Priority4: Except for a few felonies, most past incidents are classified as Priority4.

Priority 9: Those calls meeting the criteria for processing by the Telephone Report Unit (TRU).

Priority 9,77,1%
Priority 7,1, 0%
Priority4, 1169,
22%
Priority 3, 2197,
41%
Priority 1, 72,1%
Priority 2, 1864,
35%
Priority 1
72 Priority2
1864
Priority 3
2197
Priority4
1169
Priority 7
1 Priority
77 *Additional calls not shown are
T.R.U., cancelled, and missing
arrival / dispatch times.

INVESTIGATIONS
SNERIIc,�
2 E
Activity
Beginning Caseload
Number of Assigned Cases
December
173
6 Number of Closed Cases
21 Number of Arrests
1 Number of Search Warrants Written
26 Out of Custody Filings
12 Cell Phone Forensic Exams
12 Supplemental Reports
24 Patrol Assist ( hours)
20 Call Outs
4 Forensic Interviews ( Sex & Physical Abuse)
5 otal # of Sex Registrants 11 131
I # of Arson Registrants I 1 10
otal # of Sex Offenders processed 11 14
otal # of Transient Sex I Arson Registrants 11 7 1 1
I # of Sexually Violent Predators
n Violation

SOOrHwFST
INVESTICAT11
Notable
TE253570057 - Inv. Martinelli and Deputy Risen conducted a follow-up on a child abuse investigation. The suspect denied all allegations during an interview, but eventually confessed to the crime during a polygraph. The suspect was apprehended and - - arrested for child abuse charges. -
Hinckley Tufa
Adult male
TE253470030 - Master Investigator Marquez assisted with a perceived school violence threat involving Susan H. Nelson Elementary School. Through legal demands to a tech. company, it was determined that the suspect was out of the country and not credible.

TE253630083 - Cpl Au and Deputy Collins were called out to assist with a bank robbery investigation. The suspect was apprehended and booked into custody. Stolen money was recovered from the suspect.

John Ferrell
Adult male

Team Activity
On -Sight Felony Arrests
December
19 On -Sight Misdemeanor Arrests
20 Felony Arrest Warrants Served
Misdemeanor Arrest Warrants Served
Follow — up Investigations / Search Warrants
Pedestrian Checks
Traffic Stops / Vehicle Checks
Contraband.

Firearm / Weapon
Stolen Property
Vehicles Recovered
Cash (dollars)
4 13
51 15
114
4 0
0 0
Cocaine (grams)
1 Heroin ( grams)
0 Pills (count)
68 Marijuana (grams)
0 Fentanyl (grams)
4 Fentanyl (pills)
0 PCP (grams)
Ecstasy (grams)
Methamphetamine (grams)
Psilocybin (grams)

3.64 12
490

32.5 SEr

Thomas Lewis
Adult male
Misty Goodman
Adult female
On 12/05, SET was patrolling the area of Rancho California and Margarita Rd. in reference to ongoing narcotics activity. Deputy Davis initiated a traffic enforcement stop on an older Honda Accord. The driver failed to stop, and a pursuit ensued. The vehicle eventually stopped, and the driver ran from the vehicle. Additional occupants were detained. One occupant was on formal probation, and the vehicle was searched. Deputies eventually located the driver. Inside the vehicle, a large knife and methamphetamine were located. They were arrested for various HS charges, probation violations, and a felony warrant.

Juan Rodriguez Samantha Wood
Adult male Adult female
Dale Thomas
Adult male
ngc4�AnNcsenMC !+[rwAn4N��aE
'�AHDNCfAMIN� ��.f•�] LF=t'�'a
CF' i P3
410=0� I
On 12/16, SET conducted a traffic stop
on a vehicle, and the driver, Dale
Thomas, was found in possession of a
double-edged, spring -loaded knife. He
was out on bail for selling and
transporting methamphetamine. A K9
narcotics detection dog was
requested and conducted a sniff of
the vehicle, which resulted in a
positive alert for the presence of
narcotics. A search of the vehicle was
conducted, and deputies located over
a half pound of methamphetamine
along with numerous baggies. He was
arrested for multiple HS charges.

SET
Bronson
Shauna
Dyllan
Roger
Ana
McDowell
Stem
Moore
Bermudez
Avalos
Adult male
Adult female
Adult male
Adult male
Adult female
SET received information that a residence, located in the 41000 block of Via Halcon, was involved in ongoing narcotics activity, including frequent short-term traffic. This is consistent with drug users coming and going throughout the day, and possible sales occurring at the location. On 12/05, an operation involving UC and takedown units was conducted at the residence. They attempted to stop a vehicle that left the residence, but the driver fled, and a pursuit ensued. They detained the occupants of the vehicle and recovered narcotics. All were arrested for drug -related charges. A search warrant for the residence also occurred, arresting several known drug users.

RBST

ROBBERY I BURGLARY SUPPRESSION TEAM
�NER!/��
e
J
Rs�DE CO
Team Activity
Beginning Caseload
December
62 New Cases Assigned
8 Total Cases Closed
9 Search Warrants prepared / served
20 Arrests
6 Out of Custody Filings
5 CORE TEAM
SHERI�A
2 Team Activity
Reports Written
December
2 On -Sight Felony Arrests
1 On -Sight Misdemeanor Arrests
1 Felony Arrest Warrants Served
1 Misdemeanor Arrest Warrants Served
5 Traffic / Misc. Citations
0 Area Checks
28 Camp Checks
Pedestrian Checks
Traffic / Vehicle Checks
Outreach Attempts / Success
Over the Counter Reports
602 Letters / Properties
Business License / 2"d Hand Dealer Applications
0 1
16/7
12/0
2 16
4 OUTREACH EFFORTS:

In collaboration with the City H.O.T and Social Workers Action Group (S.W.A.G.) 10 subjects were contacted and offered services and all declined.

PROBLEM LOCATIONS/AREAS:

Ynez Rd. x Ynez Ct. — Behind Target
Santa Gertrudis Bike Trail
Old Town Front Street X Western Bypass
Ridge Park Rancho California Road
Diaz X Rancho California
E

CRIME PREVENTION
Team Activity
Crime Prevention / Neighborhood watch meetings
Safety Presentations / Trainings
December
1 0
Special Events
3 Residential / Business security surveys conducted
0 Residences / Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0 Station Tours
0 Planning Review Projects
2 Temp Outdoor Use Permits
4 Team Activity
On -Sight Felony Arrests
On -Sight Misdemeanor Arrests
Felony Arrest Warrants Served
December
5 5
2 Misdemeanor Arrest Warrants Served
8 Bar / Business Check
88 D.U.I. Arrests
6 Traffic / Parking Citations
124
Firearms Seized
0 I k..
sue-

�`

Scott Reitz Harley Wynn Maxwell Reitz
Adult male Adult male Adult male
On 12/06, Deputy Haecker and Deputy Carbajal stopped a white Ford Focus for expired registration (over 6 months). During the inventory of the vehicle, a large amount of cocaine was located in the trunk, including items for selling narcotics. The occupants were arrested for possession of cocaine and transportation for sales charges. A search warrant of Scott's phone identified Scott's source of supply; the subject lives in Riverside.

On 12/31, FLOCK showed Scott's vehicle near the area of the supplier. When he returned to his residence, Deputies conducted a stop of the vehicle. The vehicle was searched, and several pounds of cocaine and several grams of methamphetamine were seized.

Traffic
Citations issued for Hazardous Violations
December
790
Non -Hazardous Citations
129
Parking Citations
242
Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program ( S.L.A.P.) Citations 88 Seatbelt Citations
7 Non -Injury Collisions
21 Cell Phone Citations
161
Injury Collisions
D.U.I. Arrests
OTS / City Funded Special Operations
24 23
4 Commercial Enforcement Citations
49 Written Warnings Issued
356
Pedestrian Related Collisions
Hit and Run
3 21

TRAFFIC TEAM
On 12/11, Deputy Lopez was working speed patrol on
Butterfield Stage and Ahern Lane. He attempted to stop a vehicle for driving 66MPH in a posted 50MPH zone. The driver failed to stop and turned at a high rate of speed on Rancho California, making unsafe lane changes and running red
Lights. He crashed into another vehicle. He was arrested for vehicle pursuit charges with traffic collision damage.

Christian Hernandez
Adult male

�HERIp,�

PROMENADE
��RSlDE C�J2
Total Calls For Service
273
Felony / Arrest Filings
Misdemeanor Arrest / Filings
Traffic Citations
Total Customers Served
Fingerprints / Live Scans
Total Receipts
10 32
3 697
138
$6,069.00
On 12/18, Promenade Mall deputies conducted a Retail Theft Operation. 9 subjects were arrested for shoplifting offenses during the operation at Sephora and Macy's.

Programs/presentations conducted by SRD's: Youth Court

■w M ■ ■■• ■ ■• ■
Malcolm Devon
Lockhart Williams
Adult male Adult male
Tyshon
Hinton
Adult male
50LJTHWF.3T
PN
On 12/10, deputies responded to a vehicle burglary at the See's Candy store. The victim had just withdrawn money
from a bank in Murrieta before driving to Temecula.

Witnesses described the suspect vehicle. Using FLOCK, a license plate was located. Deputies checked video from
the bank and located the same vehicle in the bank parking lot. The vehicle information was shared with other
agencies. Fontana PD located the vehicle at a Bank of
America parking lot and detained all three occupants.

They matched the description, and they found similar
denominations of money taken in the burglary. All were
arrested for burglary charges.

On 12/19, a general broadcast of a subject in a stolen vehicle was in the Temecula area. A firearm was believed to be in the vehicle. GTF initiated a stop, but the suspect, Diamond Momosea, evaded at a high rate of speed. The suspect collided with numerous cars near the intersection of Jefferson Ave. & Winchester Rd. The suspect drove to the Temecula Mall, where he exited the vehicle and ran into the Round 1 Arcade. Deputies evacuated patrons, and the suspect was located and taken into custody.

The suspect discarded the firearm into a dumpster moments before he was taken into custody. The 9MM Glock was recovered, and he was arrested for felony evading and firearm possession.

Eduardo Nieto
Adult male
Diamond
Momosea
Adult male
On 12/25, deputies responded to the Primos Mexican restaurant in reference to a burglary in progress. They located Nieto actively attempting to break into the restaurant. He admitted to breaking into the restaurant. He was arrested for burglary and vandalism charges.

SaLJTHWF.�1
Pat Iro ihl'* I Is
i
Notable
On 12/31, deputies responded to a vehicle burglary at the EOS Fitness. The victim left her purse in her vehicle. The suspects arrived in a company vehicle and broke the
victim's window to steal her purse. The suspects stopped at several businesses to use the victim's credit cards. The vehicle was seen in FLOCK traveling to Wildomar.

Joshua Tyler Deputies located and stopped the vehicle. Suspects Everett Arrington were arrested for theft, fraud, possession of narcotics, Adult male Adult male and burglary charges.
� i i ■
On 12/30, a carjacking occurred at the Sprouts parking lot on Winchester Rd. The victim was standing by his vehicle when 2 unknown subjects approached him and told him they were taking his truck. The victim, in fear for his life, handed the keys to the suspects, and they fled. The vehicle was entered in the stolen vehicle system. Huntington Park PD stopped the vehicle and detained the driver. The driver, Ortiz, was arrested for possession of a stolen vehicle. Investigation is ongoing.

Julio Ortiz
Adult male
On 12/29, a bank robbery occurred at the Chase Bank. A male adult, identified as John Ferrell, entered the bank and handed the teller a note that read, "Robbery $4K." The teller gave him the cash, and he ran to an adjacent business before deputies arrived. Deputies located him at the Vivian Nail Spa. He was arrested for the robbery. This was his second bank robbery in the last 3 months in Temecula.

John Ferrell
Adult male

OLD TOWN STOREFRONT
� ti
2 Total Customers Served
Fingerprints / Live Scan
Police Reports Filed
VICR Releases
479
85 0
22 Citations signed off
15 Total receipts 11 $6,539.00

VOLUNTEERS
C ER
2 4��s/pE GoJ
Team Activity
Chaplain Hours
December

82.00 Community Action Patrol ( CAP) hours
237.75
Reserve Officer hours ( patrol)
0 Volunteer Patrol hours

43.25 Explorer hours

33.00 Station / Administration

29.00 Total Volunteer hours
777.75
Call Out Events
2 Special Event Hours
130.00
Area Checks
86 Traffic / Misc. Citations
4 Events in Pictures
4%
l'yU.
min,
O-
Ale
- 1, " ,
�6�T -
mo
Prepared by CA M. Chiodo 1/07/26

Events in Pictures
ollar
D $
tDOGS
04 6ef into the Holiday Spirit with our
SPECIAL K-9 CHRISTMAS FUNDRAISER

WEDNESDAY
DECEMBER 17, 2025 a '
11AM -9PM �AA
��1..
}T"E The Mexico Cie Sys
•,a„ Ca F in Temecula
44500 PECHANGA PKWY.�,
TEMECULA, CA 92592

ALL PROCEEDS WILL GO TO THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S R•9 DONATIONS

FUND DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE
"1 CANINE PROGRAM AND RETIRED Im
'POLICE SERVICE DOGS
OR 6.

Come out a Meet
ow -newest Blooddound Sadie
``\
ODE C
Prepared by CA M. Chiodo 1/07/26 23

Events in Pictures
�
f
- �;• �jl • Sri �l ' /�
a i 1S JAY
;�*
y
M
r a
�1 Vol,
Aw
'a',it it
�I
is ALL-

NNW III
r I'm
Prepared by CA M. Chiodo 12/18/25 i 24

I V
4 2
s�DE coo
Events in Pictures
�tllli: �
1a■
,' �► .. l
AL

6. Prepared by CA M. Chiodo 12/18/25

Item No. 17

CITY OF TEMECULA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 27, 2026
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at:
http://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-Improvement-Projects-CIP

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIRCULATION PROJECTS
Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25
Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases.

Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements to Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road.

Cost: $17,050,991
Status: The environmental Initial Study has been approved, Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted, and Notice of Determination filed in May 2022. Design is 60% complete. Regulatory permit applications must be resubmitted for the USACE 404 Nationwide Permit and CDFW Streambed Alteration 1602 due to the change in scope of the Murrietta Creek Phase 2B Project, headed by ACOE and RCFC. Current activities include design coordination with utility purveyors (SCE, RCWD, and EMWD) and City project PW16-05 Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, and RCFC of regulatory permit applications for SWRCB 401 Water Quality Certification and USACE Section 408. Staff is looking at mitigation options in Temecula Creek to comply with regulatory permits. Construction previously anticipated to start in Spring of 2024 is now delayed to Spring of 2027 due to coordination with ACOE and RCFC on their Murrietta Creek Phase 2B Project, and the federal Funding of $2M added to the project for the Federal 26/27 fiscal year. Federal Funding requires completion of NEPA, prior to the construction of the project, which is anticipated to take approximately 1 year to complete once funding is authorized.

French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements - Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215.

Cost: $139,751,346
Status: The project was opened for public use on April 28, 2025. For detailed information, please visit the project website at TemeculaCA.gov/FVP2.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements - Phase III, PW19-03 Description: Design and construction of the full -width French Valley Parkway from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road, including the bridge overcrossing of Interstate 15 and the northbound on -ramps.

Cost: $69,256,794
Status: Design, environmental, and right-of-way activities started in April 2025 and are expected to be complete in September 2028.

Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05
Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road.

Cost: $31,944,641
Status: Design plans are 90% complete. The project has received MSHCP conformance. NEPA approval was achieved in October 2023. CEQA was approved in February 2024. Construction start is anticipated in Summer 2027, depending on the availability of HBP funds. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP funds to earlier fiscal years to meet the project schedule. Also, additional coordination is required with ACOE and RCFC, as Murrietta Creek Phase 2B will likely be in construction concurrently with this project.

As of May 2024, Caltrans has authorized full funding of PE and ROW Phases, so all preconstruction activities are authorized for HBP funds at this time. ROW phase has started and is anticipated to be completed by summer 2027.

Overland Drive Widening, PW20-11
Description: This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights, and the installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue.

Cost: $6,857,804
Status: On July 3, 2024, the IS/MND started the 30-day public notice for comments. It was completed on August 2, 2024. Design is in progress. Consultant and staff are working on the project right-of-way requirements and temporary construction easements.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Rancho California Road Median Improvements, PW23-04
Description: Design and construction of missing raised concrete medians with landscaping between Humber Drive and Butterfield Stage Road. Additionally, there will also be construction of missing improvements on the north side of Rancho California Road, between Riesling Court and Promenade Chardonnay Hills. The improvements will include median curbs, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and landscape and irrigation.

Cost: $5,458,000
Status: 90% design documents under review.

Ynez Road Improvements — Phase I, PW23-02
Description: This project includes widening the easterly side of Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road north roughly 1600 feet, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and striped medians, in coordination with adjacent development.

Cost: $4,518,787
Status: This project is currently in design, environmental, and right-of-way clearance. The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted on December 10, 2025. The corresponding public review comment period also commenced on December 10, 2025, and concluded on January 9, 2026 De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout Project, PW23-01 Description: This project includes the design and construction of a roundabout on Ynez/De Portola Road at the intersection of Jedediah Smith Road. The improvements include the construction of a raised traffic circle with desert -style hardscape inside the circle.

Cost: $4,469,000
Status: This project is currently in design, environmental, and right-of-way clearance. Design completion anticipated early 2026.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
La Paz Road Roundabout Reconstruction, PW25-04
Description: Redesign and reconstruction of the existing roundabout on Ynez Road at the intersection of La Paz Road.

The modification improvements include the reconstruction of the raised traffic circle, entry medians, landscaping, lighting, and overall alignment of the existing roundabout.

Cost: $3,000,000
Status: Project is currently in design. Construction is anticipated to begin late 2026.

Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, PW24-08
Description: Roadway rehabilitation of Santiago Road from Ynez Road to the Santiago Road 1-15 overcrossing, Felix Valdez Avenue from Sixth Street to Vincent Moraga Drive, and Rancho Way from Diaz Road and Business Park Drive. Work will generally consist of full -width cold milling of existing asphalt, preparation of grade, placement of Asphalt Concrete Pavement, and crack seal. Work also includes removal and replacement of ADA access ramps, spandrel, and cross gutter, adjustment of existing utilities to grade, installation and removal of temporary video detection, restoration of existing striping, and detector loop removal and replacement.

Cost: $2,100,000
Status: Construction complete. Project was accepted at the December 9, 2025, City Council meeting.

Citywide Slurry Seal, PW25-06
Description: Slurry Seal the following communities: Villages, Rancho Del Sol, Verano, Rancho Solano, Costain Signet, Avendale, Barclay Estates, Woodcrest Country, Ridgeview, and Promenade at Temecula.

Cost: $1,800,000
Status: Contract work started on November 10, 2025. Construction duration is approximately 4.5 months.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Mercedes Street Sidewalk, PW25-09
Description: This project will construct the missing segment of sidewalk on the west side of Mercedes Street between Main Street and a point approximately 160' south of 3rd Street. Project will also construct crosswalks at 3rd street and a potential mid -block crosswalk connecting the southern limit of the project to the parking structure
Cost: $2,400,000
Status: New Project. Design began in December 2025. Once design is complete, including coordination with private properties, bids for construction will be requested, with construction thereafter. The total design and construction budget is estimated to exceed $2M, depending on bids.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026

INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Bike and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting, PW21-16 Description: The project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road.

Cost: $852,808
Status: Staff is working with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to obtain an encroachment permit. Plans and specifications are 90% complete. The project is expected to be bid in February 2026.

Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage, PW19-13
Description: The project consists of adding a second garage in the rear of the property to park the squad and Urban Search and Rescue (USR) vehicle, along with a gym and storage rooms. The construction is anticipated to be completed in the Fiscal Year 2025/26.

Cost: $5,165,680
Status: The Joint Project Review (JPR) with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) is ongoing and progressing toward completion, though the review process is taking longer than initially anticipated. Coordination with regulatory agencies will continue once the RCA review is finalized. Project plans and specifications are near completion. Project bidding will follow the conclusion of environmental review activities. The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) has been conducting a Joint Project Review (JPR) for the project since August 6, 2025. Regulatory agencies will have 10 days to conduct their JPR once RCA is complete. Anticipate RCA response to the latest JPR submittal in early December 2025. Plans and specifications are complete. Bidding is scheduled after the environmental regulation review is complete.

Fire Station 84 Renovation, PW19-14
Description: This project includes the design, construction, and renovation of Fire Station 84. The renovations include adding a Wellness Room, expanding the Storage Room, and upgrading the Training Room. Also, the upgrades include electrical, windows, flooring, paint, tile, HVAC, cabinets, plumbing fixtures, garage bay doors, and any necessary improvements needed to conform to ADA accessibility.

Cost: $3,529,450
Status: Construction started on October 27, 2025. Construction duration is anticipated to take 12 months.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Interstate 15/State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe.

This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, and irrigation between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange.

Cost: $3,630,295
Status: Project has entered the Landscape Maintenance phase. The contractor is responsible for maintaining plants for one year until November 2026.

Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road.

Cost: $1,257,124
Status: Construction began on November 3, 2025, with a duration of approximately 5.5 months.

Sidewalks — Citywide, PW24-06
Description: Sidewalk and other concrete repairs citywide.

Cost: $605,000.

Status: Construction complete. Project acceptance scheduled for the January 27, 2026, City Council meeting.

Bike Lane Upgrades - Citywide, PW23-10
Description: This project will install greenback bike lane pavement markings/legends on various bicycle corridors throughout the City.

Cost: $274,500
Status: This project is anticipated to be bid for construction in early 2026.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades - Citywide, PW23-11
Description: This project will install ADA-compliant ramp upgrades at school crossing sites throughout the City.

Cost: $275,000
Status: Construction is largely complete. Contractor is working on minor punch list items.

Traffic Signal - Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade — Citywide, PW23-13 Description: This project will upgrade all traffic signals' safety lights to LED and install communication system upgrades to 42 signals Citywide. Upgraded traffic signal improvements include LED streetlights, signal wiring, vehicle heads, controller cabinets, fiber cable, ethernet switches, wireless radios, and related communication equipment to improve safety and operations with optimized traffic signal timing coordination. Signal timing coordination will be improved along Butterfield Stage Road and Ynez Road corridors.

Cost: $3,255,900
Status: This project is currently in design. Design completion anticipated early 2026.

Traffic Signal Fiber Optic Extension, PW25-01
Description: This project will provide the design and installation of fiber optic communications, including conduit, cable, pull boxes, and related communication equipment for traffic signal operations. Various signalized intersections will be improved along the Margarita Road, Meadows Parkway, Date Street, and Nicolas Road corridors.

Cost: $1,675,000
Status: This project is currently in design. Design completion anticipated June 2026.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026

PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
Murrieta Creek Improvements — Trail Lights, PW21-13
Description: This portion of the project involves installing 27 solar lights along the Murrieta Creek trail on the east side of the creek from Rancho California Road to First Street.

Cost: $200,000
Status: The construction contract was awarded to Asad Holdings LLC DBA OrangeBlue General Contractors by City Council on July 22, 2025. Construction is complete, and we are in the close-out process. The Notice of Completion (NOC) went to the City Council for approval on January 13, 2026.

Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms, PW23-18
Description: This project provides for the design and construction of a new restroom facility at Long Canyon Creek Park that meets current ADA accessibility compliance standards.

Cost: $1,497,930
Status: Design complete. The project was bid from November 20, 2025, through December 16, 2025. The contract was awarded at the January 13, 2026, City Council meeting, and construction is anticipated to begin in February 2026.

Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field Restroom Building (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements).

Cost: $1,127,800
Status: The construction contract was awarded to Leslie Gunner Campbell Construction by City Council on March 11, 2025. Construction was completed in September 2025 and the Notice of Completion (NOC) was approved at the December 9, 2025, City Council meeting.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink, PW22-06
Description: This project will include the renovation of the existing hockey rink to install new flooring material, arena - style roof structure, bleachers, and various ADA compliance improvements.

Cost: $4,120,406
Status: Construction continues with anticipated substantial completion in December 2025. Electrical work, including interior and exterior lights, camera, fans, and scoreboard installation, is completed except for the push button switch for the interior lighting. Dasher boards are installed, and the contractor is working on installing cap rail and plexiglass. Concrete work is about 95%. A ribbon cutting was held on December 20, 2025.

Landscape installation and punch list items are in progress and are the only remaining items.

Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park, PW22-07
Description: Remove and replace the existing skate park and install state-of-the-art skate plaza elements.

Cost: $6,110,000
Status: Project design is complete. The project was advertised for public bidding on September 9, 2025, with the bid opening on October 14, 2025. The construction contract was awarded at the December 9, 2025, City Council meeting. The groundbreaking event took place on December 20, 2025. Construction started January 6, 2026. Anticipated completion November 2026.

Vail Ranch Park Restrooms, PW23-06
Description: This project provides for the design and construction of a new restroom facility at Vail Ranch Park that meets current ADA accessibility compliance standards.

Cost: $1,392,930
Status: This project design is complete. Project opened bids on December 16, 2025. The contract was awarded at the January 13, 2026, City Council meeting, and construction is anticipated to begin in February 2026.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026

LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

TRACT DEVELOPMENTS
Altair Tract Development
Description/ Location: Construction of approximately 1,750 new residential units and the construction of the Western Bypass (Pu'eska Mountain Parkway) in the western Temecula hills above the Old Town District between Rancho California Road and Temecula Parkway/ State 79 South.

Developer: Brookfield Residential
Status: Currently precise grading lots and streets for Villages A and B phase 1 on the Northern section of the development, and Villages C1, C2 and C3 phase 2 on the Central section of the development.

Maintaining erosion and sediment control measures in the area cleared for Villages phases 3 and 4 on the Southern section of the development. Performing wet utility tie-in work on First Street west of Pujol Street within a temporary road closure.

Elderberry Park Tract Development
Description/ Location: Construction of approximately 164 single-family residential homes in the Southeast region of the City, located along Butterfield Stage Road between De Portola Road and Temecula Parkway.

Developer: Woodside Homes
Status: Currently, precise grading for lots, finalizing storm drain systems. Completing paved interior streets and preparing for the beginning of home production. Performing dry utility tie-in structures on Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road.

Richmond American Homes Tract Development
Description/ Location: Construction of approximately 132 single-family residential homes within three separate parcels in the Northeast region of the City located along Butterfield Stage Road between Nicolas Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road.

Developer: Richmond American Homes
Status: Currently, precise grading for lots and streets. Beginning home production. Finalizing wet utility tie- ins from Murrieta Hot Springs Road.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026

MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS
Rendezvous Apartments
Description/ Location: Phase two of the Rendezvous apartment complex is located on South side of Rancho California Road at West of Cosmic Drive.

Developer: Pacific West Development
Status: Constructing both phase 1 and 2 buildings of the development.

Prado Townhomes
Description/ Location: Construction of 204 multi -family units located in the Northwesterly region of the City along the West side of Ynez Road between County Center Drive and Equity Drive.

Developer: Meritage Homes
Status: Currently, precise grading of lots and streets. Beginning home production.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Solana Senior Assisted Living
Description/ Location: Construction of a 49,000 square foot senior assisted living facility located along the East side of Margarita Road between Via La Vida and Solana Way.

Developer: Griffin Living
Status: The site is currently inactive while the developer secures additional funding to complete the project.

The City's Code Enforcement Division continues to monitor the property under an active code case.

The site remains secure and contained, with periodic monitoring by the Temecula Police Department and Fire Department as needed.

Apollo Storage
Description/ Location: Construction of a 28,000 square foot storage facility located along Madison Avenue at McCabe Court.

Developer: Avidovich Construction
Status: Constructing buildings and interior streets.

Lantern Crest
Description/ Location: Construction of a 526,762 square foot, 494-unit independent living community located at the southeast corner of Date Street at Ynez Road.

Developer: M Grant Corporation
Status: Currently rough grading site.

City of Temecula

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT STATUS REPORT
January 27, 2026

INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Nicolas Road/ Calle Girasol Realignment Improvements
Description/ Location: Construction of the realignment and extension of Nicolas Road from Butterfield Stage Road to Joseph Road, including an arch culvert bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek and a multi -use trail adjacent to the roadway.

Developer: Woodside Homes
Status: Currently finalizing preparations for the new roadway over Santa Gertrudis Creek. Expected completion early 2026.

Murrieta Creek Phase 2B Creek Restoration Project
Description/Location: Drainage improvements and restorations to Murrieta Creek between Via Montezuma to approximately 600 feet South of Rancho California Road.

Developer: US Army Corps of Engineers
Status: Currently performing vegetation clearing, potholing for utilities, and installing de -water well structures.

REQUEST TO SPEAK

FORMS, ELECTRONIC

COMMENTS AND

DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED

FOR THE RECORD

"<<,, REQUEST TO SPEAK
�, te. , CITY OF TEMECULA
Tt fr
-
\ Date: P---(
Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: ; Agenda Item:

Item Description or Item No.

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. wed La ofto_1(1,fName: l Phone Number:

Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK
.j CITY OF TEMECULA
1989 I
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: I /1 Agenda Item:

Item Description or Item No.

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.Name: NJ-,1r U MC '\1 �1W Phone Number Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

°F "F- REQUEST TO SPEAK
- �� ��, !"k CITY OF TEMECULA
1989 •
l 1 Z 7 / C
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: I, Agenda Item:

Item Description or Item No.

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: Or( W ! JG V' Phone Number:

Address: (--
Email address. • (, If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

" "' REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
%, 1989 ,,, -' )(., I
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Item Description or Item No.

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.^ �� —
Name: /v°d 44 `� ib �� C� Phone Number
Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name.

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK
!i" CITY OF TEMECULA
EAR ,
1989 s
Date: 1
Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Item Description or Item No. (C.rck,"-)--CD'071
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.

Name: PY4-' "12-1 di u rck Phone Number
Address:

Email address: `-
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK
., CITY OF TEMECULA
1989
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item: L� Item Description or Item No.

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the rec rd
Name: 0 %i( O( o6 Pho e Number: / Address: — (� 1� .�Y t1 Gt a CA qa5� Email address: �
If you are representing an organizatio group, please giyie the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

REQUEST TO SPEAK
f. •
•,4 CITY OF TEMECULA
1•
9891 - 27
Z
Date:

Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item: I
Item Description or Item No. 16(k fb I/ `A
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. �" '�/�

Address: . -
Email address:
orgroup, please give t C name:

If you are representing an organization
Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

"""ee`;„ REQUEST TO SPEAK

CITY OF TEMECULA
tUx o�dDate: //)\--)
Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Item Description or Item No. V(,(` 00
Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record
Name: sKs (1 Phone Number: %
Address: < \ cm, �jcC

�� ��
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

" ?, REQUEST TO SPEAK
f . CITY OF TEMECULA
1989 (n/2"i)
Date: I
Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Item Description or Item No.

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.
� AUI �`�/ �
Name: I.f/W fi/ I f MO" r ' Phone Number:

Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

i.0t "F'? REQUEST TO SPEAK
,. l1/4, CITY OF TEMECULA
tiit
�ivsv /
Date /22/21
Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ilgf
Item Description or Item No.

Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the recordA/,/
�f / /
Address:

Email address:

If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:

Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record.

All information provided is optional.

CF[AOSTO Q-JRYsALI
ROMS,, --- . MMX N f
ailiti, t t 1 110 , 7 # ., • \ -.. '' I.; '
J.i
t s . � =
., j/
b. �. ' 55[ _` I. may✓ 0' /,/�,��N111('I//� Yam.. /` t ,.
" v. e \ 11
+ ' a` ► -
Women Veterans and Community Women Allies
are invited to
From Chaos to ChrysalisT1 An educational community conversation focused on midlife changes in women
February 28, 2026
El olii
0 1:00-4:00 PM • • •
,. ,
VFW Post 4089 I•
'� '- •'� ��
28075 Diaz Rd ito
- ••
Temecula, CA 92590 '
Hosted by Women Veterans Scan to RSVP
of VFW Post 4089

Good afternoon, Mayor and Councilmembers.

My name is Maria `Mia' Dwyer. I am a Temecula resident and formerly served as the Post Surgeon for VFW Post 4089, where my appointment focused on wellness advocacy and member health.

I'm here to briefly make you aware of an upcoming women veterans' health education event taking place on February 28 at VFW Post 4089.

Recent national findings indicate that certain service-related factors may influence women veterans' health during midlife. This event was created to provide a respectful, educational forum for community- level awareness and discussion.

An informational brief has been submitted to City staff for recordkeeping purposes. No action is requested from the City.

Thank you for your time

From: tony Rodini <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 2:49 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Natural Kratom testimonial *URGENT*
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Council members,
My name is Tony Rodini and I am a California resident. I've been using Kratom for almost ten years, and I am a strong advocate for the plant. I have severe obsessive-compulsive disorder, as well as anxiety and a tic disorder. Kratom significantly helps reduce my anxiety,which in turn helps me manage the tics, ruminations, and other difficult symptoms caused by my conditions. Science will support that the natural plan in its unadulterated state poses no threat to the public health and safety. I believe that products containing 7-OH are in fact the problem and should be recognized as so.

Please consider all the people that Kratom, in its natural form, helps in so many different ways—and try to put yourself in our shoes. It
I'd like to regulation, not prohibition should
Tony Rodini
1 From: Sarah <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 2:48 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: RE: Ordinance # 2026-01"
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern,
I am very concerned about the states combining of the natural, God given kratom leaf with man made, synthetic substance of 7-hydroxy. It is very obvious to all, even the pharmaceutical industry as well as the DEA and FDA that these 2 substances are NOT the same thing.

Please keep these products separated and in their proper category. Natural kratom grown from a tree and dried into a power is vastly different and NOT even close to the man made, synthetic science experiment that is 7-OH.

Thank you for reading my email and I pray the people who hold the power will use their God give common sense and keep these 2 very different products separated.

Sincerely,
A natural whole leaf kratom user,
Sarah H
1 From: Marcelle Morfin <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 2:41 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance No. 2026, January 27, 2026 hearing CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Councilmembers,
I'm writing as a California resident and a plain leaf kratom consumer regarding Ordinance No. 2026, adopted at the January 27, 2026 City Council meeting.

After reviewing the final language, I'm concerned that the ordinance goes far beyond what was presented or understood during public discussion.While the stated intent focuses on risks associated with elevated or enhanced 7 hydroxymitragynine, Sections 8.56.030 and 8.56.050, together with the definitions section, make it unlawful and a public nuisance for any person to possess, sell, or distribute any kratom product.

Because 7 hydroxymitragynine occurs naturally in trace amounts in the kratom leaf, this language effectively bans all kratom, including unadulterated plant material used responsibly by ordinary consumers like myself. As written, it would result in the unintended criminalization of residents for possession of a lawful plant.

I don't support a blanket ban. I respectfully ask the Council to reconsider Ordinance No. 2026 in its entirety and revisit whether its language reflects the policy goals the City actually intends to pursue.

Thank you for your time and consideration,
Marcelle Morfin
US Army Veteran
1 From: evin carriero <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 2:30 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Proposed Kratom Ban
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am writing you this email because I am deeply saddened by your plan to ban Kratom in the city. As a 10 year daily user of natural leaf kratom I firmly disagree with the plan. I do however believe that any synthetic alkaloid such as 7oh should be banned as it is not kratom and is very harmful. I spend a lot of time and money in your city and if natural Kratom is banned I will no longer do so as I would be unfairly deemed a criminal. Please reconsider the policy to include only synthetic alkaloids. I truly enjoy Temecula and would sad of I could no longer visit and risk going to jail for a plant that has been used for thousands of years.

Evin Carriero
1 From: Mike Feldman <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 2:14 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Re: Ordinance #2026-01
Attachments: copy_128934A2-D1 C6-4514-A649-522DD7B97ADF.MOV CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello, my name is Michael and I am writing to ask the honorable Mayor and City Council members to consider regulating natural kratom products instead of full prohibition.

I'm 43yrs old and have responsibly used kratom tea powder for 15 years as a natural remedy to help manage the result of major injuries I endured in my 20's. Today I'm happy, healthy and a contributing member of society.

Up until about 3 years ago, the natural kratom industry has had minimal issues. Then, a myriad of synthetic products swarmed the market, masquerading under the name"Kratom", causing a huge uptick in adverse reports and events. These products are much much different from natural kratom. In my perspective, it would be no different than if I purchased the same coffee beans from the supermarket that I've enjoyed for many years. Then, I purchased my coffee, brewed my pot and realized that it was not coffee, but it was crystal meth, but labeled as coffee. I would be absolutely terrified and livid. This comparison is very accurate as to the comparison of kratom versus 7-OH in my perspective. People are being duped, and then getting addicted to these synthetic products. I'm asking, please don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Through my research, I've also learned that the standing FDA commissioner Marty Makary is very well educated and knows the distinctive difference between the two products. Furthermore, he's made it very clear that neither the FDA or HHS are concerned with natural kratom, but putting their focus on the synthetic extracts like 7-OH. Myself, family members, loved ones and the majority of people I know agree with this.

Thank you for taking the time to read my letter and for your consideration toward the matter. i

From: evin carriero <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 2:14 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Proposed Kratom Ban
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am writing you this email because I am deeply saddened by your plan to ban Kratom in the city.As a 10 year daily user of natural leaf kratom I firmly disagree with the plan. I do however believe that any synthetic alkaloid such as 7oh should be banned as it is not kratom and is very harmful. I spend a lot of time and money in your city and if natural Kratom is banned I will no longer do so as I would be unfairly deemed a criminal. Please reconsider the policy to include only synthetic alkaloids. I truly enjoy Temecula and would sad of I could no longer visit and risk going to jail for a plant that has been used for thousands of years.

Evin Carriero
1 From: Icjmrz4k <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 1:57 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance # 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor and Members of the Temecula City Council,
I am writing today not as an activist or business owner, but simply as a concerned citizen who deeply cares about the well-being of others in our community.

For many people, natural kratom is not a recreational substance—it is a lifeline. It helps individuals manage chronic pain, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. For others, it has played a critical role in helping them step away from opioids, alcohol, and other far more dangerous substances.These are real people—parents,veterans, workers, and seniors—who are simply trying to live functional, healthy lives.

A full ban on kratom would not eliminate demand. It would only push people toward black-market sources or back toward prescription opioids and street drugs,which are demonstrably more harmful.The unintended consequences of a ban could be devastating for individuals who are finally stable, productive, and hopeful again.

It is incredibly important to separate natural kratom leaf from high-potency extracts and synthetic isolates, especially products containing artificially elevated levels of 7-hydroxymitragynine(7-OH).These are fundamentally different substances with very different risk profiles.Targeted regulation of high-potency products makes sense.A blanket ban on natural kratom does not.

Please consider thoughtful, compassionate regulation—including age limits, product testing, labeling, and limits on 7-OH concentration—instead of an outright ban.This approach protects public safety while preserving access for those who truly depend on this plant to maintain their quality of life.

I respectfully ask you to consider the very real human impact of this decision.

Thank you for your time, care, and service to your community. 1 From:

Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 1:52 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance # 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor and Members of the Temecula City Council,
I am writing today not as an activist or business owner, but simply as a concerned citizen who deeply cares about the well-being of others in our community.

For many people, natural kratom is not a recreational substance — it is a lifeline. It helps individuals manage chronic pain, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. For others, it has played a critical role in helping them step away from opioids, alcohol, and other far more dangerous substances. These are real people — parents, veterans, workers, and seniors —who are simply trying to live functional, healthy lives.

A full ban on kratom would not eliminate demand. It would only push people toward black-market sources or back toward prescription opioids and street drugs, which are demonstrably more harmful.

The unintended consequences of a ban could be devastating for individuals who are finally stable, productive, and hopeful again.

It is incredibly important to separate natural kratom leaf from high-potency extracts and synthetic isolates, especially products containing artificially elevated levels of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH).

These are fundamentally different substances with very different risk profiles. Targeted regulation of high-potency products makes sense. A blanket ban on natural kratom does not.

Please consider thoughtful, compassionate regulation — including age limits, product testing, labeling, and limits on 7-OH concentration — instead of an outright ban. This approach protects public safety while preserving access for those who truly depend on this plant to maintain their quality of life.

I respectfully ask you to consider the very real human impact of this decision.

Thank you for your time, care, and service to your community.

From: Morgan Walton <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 1:54 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Public Comment: Opposition to the broad ban on "Kratom products" in Sections 8.56.030 and 8.56.050
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Honorable Mayor and Temecula City Council,
My name is Morgan and I am writing to you today regarding the proposed amendments to Chapter 8.56 of the Temecula Municipal Code.

While I fully support the City's efforts to regulate synthetic drugs and high-concentration synthetic compounds like 7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), I am deeply concerned that the current language of the ordinance broadly includes "all Kratom products."
I urge the Council to refine this ordinance to target 7-OH and synthetic analogs only, rather than a blanket ban on the natural plant, for the following reasons:

Natural vs. Synthetic: In its natural leaf form, 7-OH exists only in trace amounts. The primary concern regarding 7-OH stems from concentrated, synthetic versions that do not represent the natural plant. By banning all "Kratom products,"the city is inadvertently banning a natural botanical that has been used safely by millions of Americans.

A Lifeline for the Community: Many residents in Temecula and the surrounding areas rely on natural kratom to manage chronic pain or as a tool to stay away from dangerous, illicit opioids.A full ban would effectively criminalize these individuals, forcing them back toward the very"illicit drugs"the City is trying to combat.

Criminalization of Good Citizens: Passing this ordinance as currently written would turn law-abiding citizens, who are simply trying to maintain their quality of life and health—into criminals for possessing a natural plant.

I support an ordinance that keeps our community safe from dangerous synthetics, but I ask that you remove the broad "Kratom products" language and instead focus specifically on 7-OH and other synthetic substances.

Please include these comments in the official record for today's hearing.

Sincerely,
1 Morgan W.
2 From: Freddy Alvarez <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 1:51 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance # 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor and Members of the Temecula City Council,
I am writing today not as an activist or business owner, but simply as a concerned citizen who deeply cares about the well-being of others in our community.

For many people, natural kratom is not a recreational substance—it is a lifeline. It helps individuals manage chronic pain, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. For others, it has played a critical role in helping them step away from opioids, alcohol, and other far more dangerous substances. These are real people —parents, veterans, workers, and seniors—who are simply trying to live functional, healthy lives.

A full ban on kratom would not eliminate demand. It would only push people toward black-market sources or back toward prescription opioids and street drugs, which are demonstrably more harmful.

The unintended consequences of a ban could be devastating for individuals who are finally stable, productive, and hopeful again.

It is incredibly important to separate natural kratom leaf from high-potency extracts and synthetic isolates, especially products containing artificially elevated levels of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH). These are fundamentally different substances with very different risk profiles.Targeted regulation of high- potency products makes sense. A blanket ban on natural kratom does not.

Please consider thoughtful, compassionate regulation—including age limits, product testing, labeling, and limits on 7-OH concentration—instead of an outright ban. This approach protects public safety while preserving access for those who truly depend on this plant to maintain their quality of life.

I respectfully ask you to consider the very real human impact of this decision.

Thank you for your time, care, and service to your community.

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android
i

From: Holly Davis <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 1:37 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Support regulation of synthetics only - oppose full kratom ban CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula City Council,
I am writing regarding the proposed ordinance addressing kratom and synthetic substances.

I fully support the City's efforts to regulate synthetic compounds such as 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and other manufactured psychoactive substances. However, I am deeply concerned that the current language of the ordinance goes far beyond synthetics and instead creates a full ban on all kratom products, including natural, unadulterated kratom leaf.

Natural kratom is a plant. While 7-OH exists in trace amounts in the natural leaf, it is not the substance being isolated, concentrated, or synthesized in problematic products. The natural plant itself is not the issue -synthetic manipulation is.

A full ban on kratom would have serious unintended consequences:
• It would criminalize individuals who responsibly use kratom to manage pain • It would impact people using kratom to stay away from illicit drugs and opioids • It would push consumers toward unsafe and unregulated alternatives • It would punish responsible adults rather than addressing the real problem: synthetics I respectfully urge the Council to revise this ordinance so that it targets only synthetic compounds such as 7-OH and other manufactured substances, and does not include natural kratom leaf or traditional kratom products.

Please protect public safety without criminalizing people who are making safer choices for their health and well-being.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Holly Davis

From: mariana otero <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 1:11 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: 2021-54 kratom and 7-oh
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello my name is Mariana otero and i reside here in Downtown Los Angeles. I Im writing to give you a little perspective on kratom and how its changed my life for the better.

About 25 years ago I suffered a tragic accident that left me with debilitating pain.

I was given opiods by my doctor's which lead me to become dependant.

Throughout the next few years I had 3 massive back surgeries and dozens of other treatments to address my Injuries. But the main one was opiods.A lot of them. I became both an addict and a chronic pain patient taking up to 60 pills a day to get by. Id develop tolerance and then they would increase my dosage and type of narcotic.

I was a walking zombie on long term disability.

My constant desire to get clean and off these meds lead my to be in and out of rehab facilities. Many hospitals stays where I would be chemically detoxed by doctors and nurses.

The times I would be free of the addiction I would be confronted with the chronic pain of my injuries. I was a prisoner to opioids.

Unable to work,exercise or have healthy relationships with friends and family.

Until I discovered kratom.

Kratom saved my life. It allowed me to be able to cope with my chronic pain as well as allow to have a normal quality of life off of opiods.

I now work full time,work out 6x a week and feel liberated from years of constant withdrawals and addiction.

Its allowed me to again be able to have good relationships with family and friends.

With 8 little grams of a green natural powder a day I feel great.All while never needing to increase the dose.It keeps me pain free and helps my depression and anxiety all while never needing to take the poison that stole so many years of my life.

So I ask you to please keep natural kratom leaf legal and accessible. I am in favor of banning 7-oh which is not kratom leaf. Its a synthetic form that 100x the strength and very dangerous.

I ask that you consider regulating kratom like more than a dozen other states and cities have done. Wirh the the kratom consumer protection act
Which would ensure kratom products are not adultered, it would limit sales to individuals at least 18 or 21 years and require proper labeling.

Kratom has saved so many lives and gives people a natural way to cope with debilitating conditions including chronic pain and depression.

If you took this plant away my whole world would fall apart and I would be forced to turn to very dangerous opiods again and that would surely destroy my life. I would lose everything I've built and back to a life of active addiction.

My story is just one of millions. Kratom is safe and a miracle to people like me.

Thank you for listening and considering my story. I know you'll make the right decisions.

With love,
Mariana Otero

1 From: Jeremy DeLuca <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 1:08 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Keep Kratom Legal - ONLY ban 7-oh and synthetics Attachments: AKA_ Policy Brief on kratom dose-finding study_022324_vfinal (1) (1).pdf; FACT SHEET ON KRATOM VS 7-OH.docx;
safety_and_tolerability_of_single_and_multiple.435.pdf
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please keep Kratom legal(powder and the extracts), These products make such a positive difference with so many individuals and family members I know. I do agree that 7-oh and other synthetics are the issue and need to be removed from the market.

There is a lot of data on Kratom and why it should be kept on the market. I have attached a few info sheets on it because a lot of the info is misleading and incorrect.

Thank you!
Jeremy DeLuca
CEO and Founder of Parform
Co-Founder of Bodybuilding.com
1 AMERICAN

K RATO M

ASSOCIATION
F
;if.-- /.L

POLICY BRIEF
FEBRUARY 2024
•
FDA completes a kratom "dose finding study"
on humans where no significant adverse
events were observed even at very high
doses.

The FDA acknowledged at a scientific meeting the data showed no significantsafety concerns in the ascending dose study on kratom use and that clears the way for the planned Human Abuse Potential study.

The FDA announced on January 16, It is reported that the scientists at FDA accepted 2024, it will accept proposals to conduct the safety data for its evidentiary value and are now preparing to make a public presentation
a Human Abuse Potential ("HAP") study on the results of the dose finding study at a to assess the potential severity of a scientific conference in the fall of 2024. kratom dependency or addiction liability. That dose finding study data cleared the way The HAP study is authorized only for the HAP study to be advertised and that is expected to be completed within 2 years.It is
because the dose finding study showed important to note that the dose finding study kratom can be safely ingested. had to demonstrate kratom can be safely consumed before the HAP study could
ethically be advertised.

An FDA scientist reported on some of the results of the dose finding study at the Third Annual Kratom Symposium Kratom researchers are excited that the next on February 14-15,2024. Researchers report that some of level of studies on the safety and addiction the policy staff at the FDA were"profoundly disappointed" liability of kratom extract products, and safe at the lack of adverse events that occurred among human consumption levels can be identified,and the participants in the dose finding study,where the ascending limits on kratom plant constituents in a kratom doses got to 12 grams of kratom material before just 2 of product before it is deemed to be adulterated. the participants experienced some nausea.That level of Those needed dose finding and HAP studies for kratom consumption is extraordinarily high among current kratom extract products will take several years kratom consumers. after the current HAP study is completed. i. https://grants.gov/search-results-detail/351644
ii. https://pharmacy.ufl.edu/third-international-kratom-symposium/ iii. https://www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Botanical-Drug-Development-Guidance-for-Industry.pdf Q The American Kratom Association I 13575 Heathcote Boulevard,Suite 320 I Gainesville, VA 20155 www.americankratom.org--www.kratomanswers.org

FACT SHEET
Natural Kratom Leaf vs. Synthetic 7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) Why Science and Policy Treat Them Differently—7-OH Products are NOT Kratom Category Natural Kratom Leaf Products Synthetic/ Chemically Manipulated 7-OH Products
Source Derived directly from the leaves of Created through chemical manipulation of Mitragyna speciosa, a Southeast mitragynine or synthesized entirely outside the Asian plant with centuries of plant
traditional safe use
Primary Alkaloid Mitragynine (dominant alkaloid) — 7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) artificially naturally occurring with only trace concentrated or isolated amounts of 7-OH present
Presence of 7-OH Only trace amounts occur naturally High concentrations deliberately engineered through post-harvest oxidation with powerful chemical catalysts (often hundreds of times natural levels)
FDA & HHS Focus The FDA has stated natural kratom Explicitly identified by FDA and HHS as a leaf products are not the target of significant public-health concern federal enforcement actions
Statements by FDA Commissioner Makary: all FDA & HHS: synthetic 7-OH represents the next Federal Officials kratom contains only trace 7-OH wave of opioid risk naturally; this is not the concern
Pharmacology Mixed mild adrenergic, serotonergic, High-potency mu-opioid receptor agonism and partial opioid activity; dose- mirroring and matching synthetic opioids dependent stimulant to sedative
profile
Risk Profile No demonstrated respiratory Elevated risk of respiratory depression, depression at natural levels; very low euphoria spikes, and addiction liability overdose risk when unadulterated
Product Forms Leaf, powder, capsules, beverages, Gummies, tablets, sublinguals, chewable extracts using FDA approved food- tablets, vapes, shots chemically engineered for grade solvents, made from whole- rapid absorption plant material
Traditional Yes — centuries of documented use No peer-reviewed published articles on the safe History of Use in Southeast Asia —including use of 7-OH, and no evidence and data to hundreds of peer-reviewed support market introduction as required by published articles federal law
Regulatory Regulated under Kratom Consumer Increasingly banned or scheduled as synthetic Treatment Protection Acts (KCPA) in 19 states opioid-like substances—currently (States) recommended for scheduling at the federal level
Appropriate Consumer protection standards: Scheduling, bans, and enforcement against Policy Approach labeling, purity testing, age limits synthetic opioids

Key Policy Takeaways
• Natural kratom is not synthetic 7-OH — scientifically, pharmacologically, or legally. • Federal officials have drawn a bright line:

Natural kratom leaf products are not the problem. Synthetic 7-OH is. • States that have fully evaluated the science reject scheduling kratom and instead adopt KCPA regulation.
• Scheduling mitragynine would contradict prior scientific findings, ignore legislative trends, and conflate safe plant-based products with dangerous synthetic substitutes.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
OPEN
Safety and Tolerability of Single and Multiple Daily Oral Doses of Dried Kratom Leaf Powder in a Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers
Marilyn A. Huestis, PhD,*John Bothmer, PhD,t Thomas Hudzik, PhD,t Jack E. Henningfield, PhD,§and Sibyl Swift, PhD7/
increased alanine aminotransferase level, and nausea were most Background: Kratom use is rising,increasing the need for safety common after MD. and tolerability studies of high-quality and well-characterized kratom products in humans.Kratom's risk—benefit ratio,recommended dose, Conclusions: This SD and first MD controlled study shows that treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE5), abuse potential, and Mitragyna speciosa—derived MitraLeaf kratom powder was safe and withdrawal require evaluation. Thus, the safety and tolerability of well tolerated at the dose ranges tested,with no evidence of mean- 4 escalating single and 15 daily dried kratom leaf powder doses in ingful abuse potential or withdrawal. human volunteers were evaluated over 47 days in the largest con- Key Words: kratom, mitragynine, safety, human administration, trolled kratom-administration study to date. adverse events Methods: A randomized, between-subject, double-blind,placebo- (Ther Drug Monit 2026;00:1-11) controlled,dose-escalation study of MitraLeaf kratom powder after single doses(SD),during 15 daily doses(multiple doses;MD),and BACKGROUND a 23-day follow-up was conducted in 116 volunteers(49 MitraLeaf Mitragynine represents about 1%-2% w/w of kratom and 67 placebo). Twelve participants each received a SD of either leaves of Mitragyna speciosa, and as the primary alkaloid,

6.65, 13.3, 26.6, or 53.2 mg (n = 13) mitragynine in 500, 1000, approximately 66% of the total alkaloid content of the 2000, or 4000 mg of MitraLeaf, respectively, with a 10-day leaves)t There are no US Food and Drug Administration follow-up.The same participants received 15 daily doses at the same (FDA)- or European Medicines Agency—approved uses for concentration of SD mitragynine received,with a 27-day follow-up kratom or mitragynine; however, kratom users report taking period. Inclusion criteria were nonsmoking healthy males and fe- kratom to improve their mood,increase energy levels, reduce males who never used kratom or had not used kratom fatigue, induce analgesia, and help manage their opioid use for a 12 months, 18-55 years old, and BMI .18.5 and - 29.9 kg/ disorder.2 m2. Participants were excluded if they had known CYP3A4, Kratom and mitragynine are not scheduled substances CYP2D6,or CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms. in the United States according to the Controlled Substances Results: No serious adverse events or deaths were reported. Act,although 6 US states currently ban kratom.3 They are not included in the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 TEAEs after SD or MD generally increased as the dose increased. or the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971. In Dizziness, nausea, and feeling of relaxation were the most 2021,the World Health Organization's Expert Committee on commonly reported TEAEs after SD, and headache, feeling hot, Drug Dependence completed a preliminary review of kratom and mitragynine and determined that they did not meet the criteria for potential inclusion as a banned substance.4 Received for publication August 12,2025;accepted October 15,2025. In 1967,Beckett and Morton5 first reported 7-hydroxy- From the *Institute of Emerging Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson mitragynine (7-OH-mitragynine) as the major mitragynine University,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania;tJB Phatma Consulting,Heerlen, metabolite (65.8%) after 0-demethylation in rabbit liver mi- the Netherlands; $AlaBiopharma Consulting, New Jersey; crosomes. The primary CYP450 enzyme for mitragynine §PinneyAssociates, Bethesda, Maryland; and ¶NP Pharma, Marietta, Georgia. metabolism is the most abundant CYP3A4 that plays a pre- NP Pharma paid to conduct the clinical study,Drs.M.A. Huestis and J.E. dominant role in 7-OH-mitragynine formation, along with Henningfield received consultant fees from NP Pharma for suggestions minor enzymes, CYP2D6 and CYP2C9.6 Mitragynine was about the study design,and all authors received consultant fees from NP extensively metabolized in human liver microsomes primarily Pharma for data analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Correspondence: Marilyn A. Huestis, PhD, 109 Hawks Nest Drive, to 0-demethylated and monooxidative metabolites. Zhang Fredericksburg,VA 22405(e-mail:[email protected]). et al did not find detectable levels of 7-OH-mitragynine in Copyright C 2026 The Author(s).Published by Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc. fresh kratom leaves7; therefore, the metabolism of mitragy- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative nine via cytochrome P450 subtype 3A4 is the primary source Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 of 7-OH-mitragynine in human plasma. (CCBY-NC-ND),where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited.The work cannot be changed in any way or Mitragynine and 7-OH-mitragynine are partial agonists used commercially without permission from the journal. of the human µ-opioid receptor and competitive antagonists Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 1

Huestis et al Ther Drug Montt • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 of K-and S-opioid receptors.8 Compared with morphine, mi- blood glucose concentrations were normal throughout the tragynine in kratom extracts has a lower potency and affinity study period, and all participants described tongue numbness for µ-opioid receptors, is unable to induce comparable phos- after drinking the tea.No abnormal signs and symptoms were phorylation and GTPyS stimulation, and binds to K- and detected. 8-opioid and dopamine receptors.9 Unlike full µ-opioid ago- In another human controlled mitragynine- nists such as morphine and fentanyl,mitragynine poorly acti- administration study, kratom tea was prepared by steeping vates the I3-arrestin-2 pathway, which is implicated in many 2 g of kratom containing 39 mg of mitragynine and no detect- adverse effects of µ-opioid agonists, including respiratory able 7-OH-mitragynine in hot water.22 The tea was consumed depression and constipation.10,11 Mitragynine and 7-OH-mi- within 10 minutes by 7 healthy participants (3 males, 4 fe- tragynine are G-protein—based agonists of the µ-opioid recep- males) with a history of kratom use. One female participant tor supporting early reports of the reduced respiratory withdrew from the study due to nausea and vomiting 20 mi- depression of mitragynine compared with codeine,12 and mutes after consuming the tea and was replaced by another a more recent study demonstrating no significant respiratory female participant, who also withdrew 48 hours later after depression in rats receiving up to 400 mg/kg oral experiencing nausea,vomiting,and abnormal urine. Five par- mitragynine.13 ticipants completed the study, had no serious adverse events, The pharmacological profiles of mitragynine and its and tolerated the kratom tea. analog offer the possibility of analgesia with less respiratory Tanna et a123 later studied the drug interaction potential depression; however, all compounds that attenuate of kratom based on the effects of a single low dose of kratom nociception/pain are associated with reinforcing behavior tea(2 g)on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A4 probe sub- and dependence.2 In 2022, Henningfield et al14 updated the strate midazolam(2.5 mg)and CYP2D6 probe substrate dex- assessment of kratom's abuse potential showing the relatively tromethorphan (30 mg). Twelve healthy adult participants low abuse potential of kratom compared with morphine-like drank kratom tea before oral administration of midazolam opioids,stimulants,and other abused drugs that have demon- and dextromethorphan.Each gram of kratom leaves contained stated robust rewarding effects across intravenous self- 19.5 mg of mitragynine resulting in a total dose of approxi- administration and intracranial self-stimulation models and mately 39 mg of mitragynine. Kratom had no effect on the conditioned place preference animal models. Humans con- area under the curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concen- sume kratom orally, rather than via inhalation or injection. tration (C,,,a„) of dextromethorphan indicating that Drugs that are inhaled or injected are delivered rapidly and in mitragynine/kratom did not affect CYP2D6 enzyme activity. higher concentrations to the brain, thus increasing abuse However, the AUC and C,1187 of midazolam increased mod- potential. However, when high kratom doses are consumed estly while the half-life was unchanged, suggesting that kra- frequently, physical dependence and withdrawal can occur, torn primarily inhibited intestinal CYP3A.Consuming kratom similar to other substances such as caffeine. Nevertheless, with drugs extensively metabolized by CYP3A could affect kratom withdrawal is much less intense than prototypical exposure to both drugs and elicit adverse events. opioids such as fentanyl or oxycodone and is usually self- The current study was designed to assess the safety and managed without clinical intervention.15 tolerability of a well-characterized, raw, dried, M. speciosa— Mitragynine is also active at other receptors including derived kratom leaf powder after single oral ascending doses a-adrenergic(alA,a1B,a1D, a2A, a2B,and a2C), 5-HT2C (SD) and during and after 15 consecutive once-daily oral serotonin,5-HT7 serotonin,D2 dopamine,and A2A adenosine ascending doses (MD) in healthy adults under steady-state receptors.18-19 Leon et a12° also reported potential mitragy- conditions. nine activity at the 5-HTIA receptor. Thus, mitragynine's pharmacology is distinct from that of opioids, with only par- tial agonism at µ-opioid receptors and physiological and MATERIALS AND METHODS behavioral effects caused by its adrenergic, serotoninergic, dopaminergic, and adenosinergic activity. Study Design Safety and tolerability studies with high-quality and A randomized,between-subject,double-blind,placebo- well-characterized kratom products in humans are needed to controlled, dose-escalation, single-site study of MitraLeaf assess the risk—benefit ratio and recommended doses and to (encapsulated dried kratom leaf powder, NP Pharma, evaluate behavioral and physical safety based on events Marietta, GA)was conducted for 10 days after administering including treatment-emergent adverse events(TEAEs),abuse SD and 15 MD and for 23 days of follow-up in healthy adults. potential, and withdrawal. To date, few in-human studies There were 31 in-person clinical visits over 47 days; in the have evaluated the safety of kratom(M. speciosa).21-23 SD phase, dosing occurred on day 0, with data collection on In an early kratom-administration study, 10 chronic days 1,2, 3, 5, 7, and predose day 10, and in the MD phase, (median use 1.75 years), regular (median kratom tea con- data were collected after the 15 MD on days 10-24 and on sumption 4 times/day), 1, 2, or 3 healthy kratom users days 25-27,29,31,34,40,and 47.Intensive pharmacokinetic received 6.25-11.5 mg of mitragynine in kratom tea for 7 days assessments were performed after each single oral MitraLeaf before receiving 6.25-23 mg of mitragynine doses orally.21 dose and on the last of 15 consecutive daily MitraLeaf doses.

No adverse events were reported. Median blood pressure and The study was conducted according to the Declaration of pulse increased from approximately 87 to 92 mm Hg and 75 Helsinki and approved by the Advarra Institutional Review to 77 bpm, respectively, peaking after 8 hours. Capillary Board (protocol code 00048457 approved on 20 June 2022) 2 Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 Safety and Tolerability of Dried Kratom Leaf Powder and Health Canada. Written informed consent was obtained which was not necessarily clinically significant. Only shifts from all study participants. that were considered noteworthy(a participant had 3 or more shifts in a single parameter, or at least 3 participants had Study Population and Dosing a single shift in the same parameter,or there was a clinically Inclusion and exclusion criteria are included in Table 1. significant shift)were described. To minimize bias,the spon- Participant recruitment and stratification balanced the ratio of sor representative, PI, participants, and personnel interacting sex between active and placebo groups. with participants were blinded to active or placebo interven- A dose of 1000 mg of MitraLeaf contained 13.3 mg tional assignments. of mitragynine and _12 mo
Agreement to use appropriate birth control method throughout the study Females of childbearing potential testing negative on pregnancy tests and not breastfeeding and having no intention to get pregnant or breastfeed throughout the study
Exclusion criteria
Participant has allergies to the product
Known CYP3A4,CYP2D6,or CYPIA2 genetic polymorphism
Presence of gastrointestinal,hepatic,renal,cardiovascular,respiratory,autoimmune,endocrine,neurological,or active psychiatric diseases Positive serology results for HIV(HIV),hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg),or hepatitis C virus(HCV) Participant has allergies to the product
History of cancer
Participant has allergies to the product
History of cancer
Acute illness within 2 weeks of the single kratom dose
Positive urine drug test
History of drug or alcohol abuse in last 12 mo
Leeds Dependence Questionnaire score>-21
Consumption of>-2 alcoholic beverages a day
Hepatic or renal dysfunction with alanine aminotransferase(ALT)or aspartate aminotransferase(AST)>_2xupper limit of normal(ULN)and serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen(BUN)>-1.5xULN evaluated by the principal investigator(PI)for inclusion or exclusion Blood donation or participation in another research study within past 4 wk Medications that induced enzymes not permitted for 14 days or 7 half-lives of first dose;noninducers were permitted within 7 d Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 3

Huestis et al Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 TABLE 2. Safety Parameters and Assessment Schedule
Safety Parameters During Single Dosing Phase During Multiple Dosing Phase Comprehensive metabolic panel' Baseline,days 0, 1,and 10 Days 25 and 47 Additional liver and kidney tests Days 3 and 7 Days 11, 13, 15, 18,22,27,34,and 40 Hematology panel Baseline,days 0, 1,and 10 Days 25 and 47 Vital signst Baseline,days 0-7,and 10 Days 10-27,29,34,40,and 47 RR$and capillary blood oxygen(SpO2) Baseline and before dosing on day 0 Before dosing days 10-24 and days 25-27 ECG Baseline and before dosing on day 0 Day 24
'Comprehensive metabolic panel included liver and kidney tests. tVital signs included SBP,DBP,HR,and body temperature.
tRespiratory rate.
after 15 daily kratom doses; a battery of cognitive tests with TEAE and without sleep deprivation are reported in a separate man- There were no serious adverse events or deaths after uscript that focuses on kratom's abuse potential. administration of SD or MD dried kratom leaf powder or placebo. The percentages of participants receiving active Data Analysis kratom leaf who reported at least 1 TEAE after any SD,after The safety and tolerability of single oral ascending doses any MD,and during the follow-up phase were 49.0%,54.5%, over 10 days and 15 daily repeated oral ascending doses of and 25.0%, respectively. Of the participants receiving pla- dried kratom leaf powder in healthy participants during steady- cebo, 41.8%reported at least 1 TEAE after SD, 50.0% after state conditions was summarized with the number and propor- MD,and 20.0%during follow-up. Figures 1 and 2 shows the tion of participants with at least 1 TEAE,clinical chemistry and percentages of active and placebo participants reporting hematological shift from baseline, vital signs, and ECG. TEAEs at each SD and MD phase and during follow-up.

Not all TEAEs were suspected to be related to the interven- tion by the physician evaluating the participants.

RESULTS The percentages of participants who received active kratom and reported descriptively more TEAEs during MD
Participants compared with SD generally increased as the MitraLeaf dose In total, 116 participants were enrolled in the study,49 increased. TEAE severity after receiving active kratom was received active drug, and 67 received placebo. Participant evaluated as mild in 90% of SD reports, 97.5% of MD demographics are shown in Table 3 for each SD and MD reports, and 50% of follow-up reports. Among the TEAEs subcohort. Each cohort enrolled different participants, and reported by participants who received placebo, 92.1% were participants completed both the SD and MD phases unless mild. Figure 2 shows the severity (mild, moderate, or severe they were terminated early. percentage)of all TEAEs after active or placebo MitraLeaf in TABLE 3. Participant Demographics
Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Cohort 4

6.65 mg 13.3 mg 26.6 mg 53.2 mg
500 mg 1000 mg 2000 mg 4000 mg Placebo
Mitragynine MitraLeaf SD MD SD MD SD MD SD MD SD MD #Participants 12 11 12 11 12 10 13 12 67 60 Sex 6F 6F 4F 4F 4F 3F 7F 6F 33F 28F
6M 5M 8M 7M 8M 7M 6M 6M 34M 32M Race
Al 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 2
Asian 2 2 5 5 l 0 0 0 10 9
Black 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 1 12 10 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1
White 10 9 7 6 7 7 9 8 40 38
Ethnicity 2 H 2 H 1 H 1 H 0 H 0 H 3 H 3 H 6 H 4 H
10 NH 9NH 11 NH 10 NH 12 NH lO NH LO NH 9NH 61 NH 56 H Mean age(STD)yr 30.8(9.3) 31.3(9.5) 32.9(9.4) 33.9(9.2) 35.8(11.4) 37.3(12.1) 33.2(9.6) 33.9(9.7) 32.7(9.9) 33.4(10.0) BMI kg/m2 23.1 (2.7) 22.8(2.6) 25.3(2.6) 25.4(2.7) 26.2(3.4) 26.1 (3.7) 23.4(2.9) 23.8(2.8) 25.4(2.7) 25.5(2.7) AI,American Indian or Alaskan Native;F,female;H,Hispanic;M,male;MD,multiple doses;NH,Non-Hispanic;SD,single dose. 4 Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 Safety and Tolerability of Dried Kratom Leaf Powder 100
90 -
80 70
60 c• 50 ro � -
• 40
30 —
FIGURE 1. Percentage of participants re- 20
porting treatment-emergent adverse events - - (TEAEs) by cohort (dose) and study phase 10 _
(SD, MD, and follow-up [FU]) after receiv- - 111 ing active and placebo MitraLeaf (dried o - - — kratom leaf powder). SD 1 SD 2 SD 3 SD 4 P SD MD 1 MD 2 MD 3 MD 4 P MD FU 1 FU 2 FU 3 FU 4 PFU the SD,MD,and follow-up phases. With active MitraLeaf, 5 Headache(11), feeling hot(6),nausea(5), somnolence moderate and 1 severe TEAEs were reported after SD, 6 (5), and increased ALT levels (5) were the most common moderate and 1 severe TEAEs were reported after MD, and preferred terms for TEAEs reported across all active 5 moderate and 3 severe TEAEs were reported during follow- MitraLeaf MDs, whereas headache (14), somnolence (5), up. The severe TEAE during the SD phase was a severe and contusion (4) were the most common across all placebo vasovagal response during blood collection,whereas that dur- kratom MDs. Table 5 includes all TEAEs reported by more ing the MD phase was severe gastroenteritis after the admin- than 1 participant after active or placebo kratom istration of 13.3 mg of mitragynine (1000 mg of kratom). (mitragynine) MDs.

Both participants were withdrawn from the study by the PI, Six participants terminated the study early as the and the TEAE resolved without any sequelae. The 3 severe blinded investigator suspected the TEAEs to be related to TEAEs during follow-up were not considered related to the the investigational product (IP). Two early terminations active MitraLeaf administration. With placebo kratom, 8, 8, occurred in cohort 2. The first was initiated by the PI due and 1 moderate TEAEs were reported in the SD, MD, and to a moderate ALT increase of<2xULN, the a priori study follow-up phases,respectively. criteria for stopping dosing, of 45 U/L on day 6 after the Nausea (8), dizziness (7), and headache (5) were the single dose to 83 U/L after the second and 98 U/L after the most common TEAEs reported across all active doses in the fourth multiple daily doses. The fifth multiple daily kratom SD phase. After placebo SDs, the most common preferred dose was not administered, and the participant was early ter- terms for reported TEAEs were headache(8),dizziness(7),and minated from the study. The other early termination in cohort somnolence(5). Table 4 includes the number and percentages 2 was due to a severe TEAE of gastroenteritis after the ninth of all TEAEs reported by more than 1 participant after receiv- multiple daily doses. There were 3 early terminations in ing active MitraLeaf or placebo kratom(mitragynine)SDs. cohort 3, with only 1 suspected to be related to the IP. This loo
so
g so
• 70
tu 60
o 50
FIGURE 2. Mild, moderate, severe, and 9 40
serious treatment-emergent adverse events u 30
(TEAEs) by dose and study phase(SD, MD, iv 20
and follow-up [FU]) after receiving active °-
and placebo MitraLeaf (dried kratom leaf 10
powder). Three severe TEAEs in cohort o
1 follow-up phase were considered not SD 1 SD 2 SD 3 SD 4 P SD MD 1 MD 2 MD 3 MD 4 P MD FU 1 FU 2 FU 3 FU 4 PFU related to administration of the MitraLeaf
(treatment intervention). •Mild ■Moderate ■Severe Copyright©2016 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 5

Huestis et al Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 TABLE 4. Numbers and Percentages of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported by More Than One Participant After Receiving Single Doses of Active or Placebo MitraLeaf(Dried Kratom Leaf Powder) by Organ System Single Dose Reported Incidence by Kratom[Mitragyninel mg Dose,n Kratom mg Mitragynine[mg] 500[6.651 1000[13.3] 2000[26.61 4000[53.2] Placebo Total Number of Participants n=12 n=12 n=12 n=13 n=67 Number of participants who reported the events n(%) 2(16.7) 5(41.7) 5(41.7) 10(76.9) 19(28.4) Number of participants who reported nervous system-related events 0(0.0) 3(25.0) 3(25.0) 8(61.5) 17(25.4) Headache 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 0(0.0) 4(30.8) 8(11.9) Syncope 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 0(0.0) 1 (1.5) Dizziness 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 5(38.5) 7(10.4) Somnolence 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 3(23.1) 5(7.5) Presyncope 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 0(0.0) 1 (1.5) Blood and lymphatic-related events 1 (8.3) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.5) Leukopenia 1 (8.3) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(1.5) Gastrointestinal events 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 2(16.7) 4(30.8) 3(4.5) Nausea 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 2(16.7) 4(30.8) 2(3.0) Vomiting 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(15.4) 0(0.0) Upper abdominal pain 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(3.0) General disorders 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 2(16.7) 5(38.5) 4(6.0) Feeling relaxed 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 2(15.4) 1(1.5) Feeling abnormal 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 0(0.0) 1 (1.5) Feeling drunk 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(15.4) 0(0.0) Feeling hot 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(15.4) 0(0.0) Increased energy 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(3.0) Psychiatric events 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 1 (8.3) 2(15.4) 1 (1.5) Hypervigilance 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 0(0.0) 1 (7.7) 0(0.0) Euphoric mood 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 1 (7.7) 1 (1.5) Injury,poisoning,and procedural complications 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 3(4.5) Contusion 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 3(4.5) participant voluntarily withdrew from the study due to mul- (16.7%) moderate, and 3 (25.0%) severe. Five TEAEs were tiple TEAEs on day 1 SD. Less than an hour after the first not suspected to be related to the IP, namely 2 moderate dose, the participant experienced vasovagal syncope for tremors and 3 severe events (1 severe presyncope and 2 1 minute, which coincided with an episode of"seizure-like severe syncope) in 1 participant receiving the lowest mitra- activity"that fully resolved without behaviors such as disori- gynine dose; these events were associated with blood collec- entation or confusion. The PI reported no evidence of epilep- tion during follow-up. Seven adverse events were suspected tic seizure, and due to its brief duration,no EEG evidence of to be TEAE-related events, with no TEAE reported in more seizure was obtained. This was the only report of"seizure- than 1 participant in the SD, MD, or follow-up phase. One like activity" in any of the 49 participants receiving active participant voluntarily withdrew early because of an adverse drug;furthermore,vasovagal syncope is an event that may be event before the first dose involving bruising at the catheter misdiagnosed as seizure.27.28 Dizziness and nausea were also site. The remaining participants completed the study. reported by the participant,and they were withdrawn from the After receiving the 13.3 mg of mitragynine dose, 10 of study. 12 participants reported 63 TEAEs,of which 55(87.3%)were Among 4 early terminations in cohort 4, 3 were due to mild,7(11.1%)moderate,and 1 (1.6%)severe.Eight TEAEs suspected TEAEs.Two were withdrawn due to elevated ALT were not suspected to be related to the IP, including 5 mild and AST during the MD phase,which resolved after cessation and 3 moderate adverse events; 55 TEAEs were suspected to of the IP. One participant voluntarily withdrew after com- be related to the IP. No TEAE was reported in more than 1 pleting day 1 MD and reporting headache,feeling hot,feeling participant in the SD or follow-up phase, but in the MD, drunk, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. All participants headache (3) and feeling abnormal (2) were reported by recovered from all TEAEs at the end of the study except 1 a greater percentage of participants in the active group than with a mild TEAE of uterine hemorrhage suspected to be in the pooled placebo group. A single participant in cohort 2 related to the IP. Uterine TEAEs related to kratom or reported diarrhea in the follow-up phase. mitragynine have not been reported in the literature. Seven of 12 participants reported 39 TEAEs after After receiving the lowest mitragynine dose (6.65 mg; receiving 26.6 mg of mitragynine; 36 (92.3%) were mild, 2 across the SD, MD, and follow-up phases), 5 of 12 partici- (5.1%)moderate, and 1 (2.6%)severe. Five TEAEs were not pants experienced 12 TEAEs;7 TEAEs(58.3%)were mild,2 suspected to be related to the IP, including 4 mild and 1 6 Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 Safety and Tolerability of Dried Kratom Leaf Powder TABLE 5. Numbers and Percentages of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events After Receiving 15 Daily Doses of Active or Placebo MitraLeaf(Dried Kratom Leaf Powder) by Organ System Reported Incidence by Treatment Group n
Kratom mg 500[6.65] 1000[13.3] 2000 126.61 4000[53.2] Placebo Mitragynine[mg] n=11 n=11 n= 10 n=12 n=60 Number of participants reporting the events n(%) 2(18.2) 7(63.6) 4(40.0) 10(83.3) 25(41.7) General disorders 1 (9.1) 3(27.3) 1 (10.0) 7(58.3) 6(10.0) Fatigue 1 (9.1) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 1(8.3) 1 (1.7) Feeling relaxed 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 1(8.3) 2(3.3) Feeling abnormal 0(0.0) 2(18.2) 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 3(5.0) Feeling hot 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (10.0) 5(41.7) 0(0.0) Feeling drunk 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 4(33.3) 0(0.0) Asthenia 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (1.7) Gastrointestinal disorders 2(18.2) 1 (9.1) 2(20.0) 8(66.7) 6(10.0) Dry mouth 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (1.7) Abdominal pain 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 2(3.3) Upper abdominal pain 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(3.3) Constipation 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 1 (10.0) 2(16.7) 0(0.0) Diarrhea 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(3.3) Nausea 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(20.0) 3(25.0) 3(5.0) Vomiting 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 0(0.0) Infrequent bowel movements 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 0(0.0) Psychiatric disorders 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 4(6.7) Hypervigilance 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 2(3.3) Anxiety 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (1.7) Insomnia 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(3.3) Nervous system disorders 0(0.0) 4(36.4) 3(30.0) 8(66.7) 18(30.0) Headache 0(0.0) 3(27.3) 2(20.0) 6(50.0) 14(23.3) Somnolence 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 4(33.3) 5(8.3) Lethargy 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (1.7) Paresthesia 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 1 (10.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (1.7) Dizziness 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (10.0) 3(25.0) 3(5.0) Discomfort in the head 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(3.3) Injury,poisoning,and procedural complications 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 4(6.7) Contusion 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 4(6.7) Investigations 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 1 (10.0) 3(25.0) 3(5.0) Increased ALT levels 0(0.0) 1 (9.1) 1 (10.0) 3(25.0) 1 (1.7) Increased AST levels 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (10.0) 2(16.7) 0(0.0) Increased weight 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(3.3) Skin-and tissue-related events 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1(8.3) 2(3.3) Pruritus 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1 (8.3) 2(3.3) Metabolism-and nutrition-related events 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 1 (1.7) Decreased appetite 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 2(16.7) 1 (1.7) ALT,alanine aminotransferase;AST,aspartate aminotransferase. moderate adverse event. Thirty-four TEAEs (including nau- mild, 5 (2.0%) were moderate, and none were severe. sea)reported by more than 1 participant in the SD phase and Seventeen TEAEs were not suspected to be IP-related events, by a greater percentage of participants in the active group than including 16 mild and 1 moderate event.Of 229 suspected IP- in the pooled placebo group were suspected to be IP-related related TEAEs, nausea, dizziness, feeling drunk, feeling hot, events. During the MD phase, more than 1 participant and feeling relaxed,headache, somnolence(including 1 moderate a greater percentage of participants in the active group re- event),and vomiting were reported in more than 1 participant ported headache and nausea than in the pooled placebo group. in the active SD MitraLeaf group,and in a greater percentage No TEAEs occurred in more than 1 participant in the follow- of participants in the active group than in the pooled placebo up phase. group.During the MD phase,increased ALT,increased AST, After the highest mitragynine dose(53.2 mg), 11 of 13 constipation, decreased appetite, dizziness, feeling abnormal, participants had 246 TEAEs, of which 241 (98.0%) were feeling drunk, feeling hot, headache, infrequent bowel Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 7

Huestis et al Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 movements,nausea,somnolence,and vomiting were reported Abuse Potential and Withdrawal by more than 1 participant and by a greater percentage of The number of participants who reported abuse poten- participants in the active MitraLeaf group than in the pooled tial—related TEAEs increased with increasing dose. Dizziness placebo group.No TEAEs occurred in more than 1 participant was the most common abuse potential—related TEAE in the during follow-up. All participants recovered from all TEAEs SD phase,and feeling hot was the most common TEAE in the by the end of the study. MD phase. Euphoric mood, the primary abuse potential— related TEAE, was reported in only 3 participants, 1 in each Hematology and Clinical Chemistry Shifts active cohort and in the placebo cohort. No participant re- No consistent trends in shifts from baseline to any ported euphoric mood after receiving active kratom in the postbaseline visit for hematology and clinical chemistry MD phase, whereas 1 participant receiving the MD placebo reported euphoric mood. Only 1 withdrawal-related TEAE, parameters were observed across cohorts after active MitraLeaf dosing, with no differences from pooled placebo. that is,mild diarrhea,was reported during the follow-up phase After receiving 13.3 mg of mitragynine, 1 participant was by 1 participant receiving 13.3 mg of mitragynine. withdrawn from the study by the PI because of increased ALT Published results of a pharmacokinetic study involving that did not meet the a priori criteria of 2xULN; the ALT the oral administration of single and 15 daily doses of 6.65, concentration returned to normal after IP cessation. After 13.3, 26.6, or 53.2 mg of mitragynine through 500�000 mg receiving 53.2 mg of mitragynine, 2 participants who were dried kratom leaf powder to 12 healthy controls 29= 13 for withdrawn by the PI because of clinically significant eleva- the highest dose) are summarized as follows. Median tions in ALT and AST, which resolved within 2 weeks after (range) mitragynine Cmax were 12.1 (1.8-61.5), 29.0 (16.0— stopping the IP. There were no significant elevations in total 58.1), 57.4 (20.4-90.0), and 130 (34.2-204.0) ng/mL with bilirubin in any participant. median(range) T. of 1.0-1.3 (0.8-5.0) h after the admin- istration of single 6.65, 13.3,26.6,or 53.2 mg of mitragynine Vital Signs, RR, Sp02, and ECG doses, respectively. Median (range) mitragynine Cmax were

16.2 (2.8-60.1), 35.1 (21.8-43.1), 73.0 (42.4-109.0), and The PI and medical monitor reported no clinically 155.0 (64.3-215.0) ng/mL with median (range) mitragynine significant abnormal findings in BP, HR, RR, or SpO2. Most Tmax of 1.0-1.7(0.8-4.0)h after 15 daily 6.65, 13.3,26.6,or abnormal findings were asymptotic and attributed to partic- 53.2 mg of mitragynine doses, respectively. Median (range) ipants being nervous or in a hurry.After receiving 13.3 mg of 7-OH-mitragynine C, , were 3.6 (1.5-8.6), 7.0 (4.8-7.8), mitragynine, 1 participant who completed the study reported 11.0 (4.3-16.0), and 21.7 (12.5-38.6), with median (range) a mild TEAE of palpitations on day 1 MD that resolved T. of 1.2-1.8 (0.8-5.0) h after the same single oral mitra- within 30 minutes; this participant did not have abnormal gynine doses. Median (range) 7-OH-mitragynine Cmax were HR or BP at this time but experienced elevated but not din- 3.3 (1.4-5.6), 5.6 (4.3-8.1), 12.0(6.9-17.4),and 20.9(13.3— ically significant BP on day 12 MD, which returned to base- 31.7)ng/mL,with median(range)Tmax of 1.3-2.0(0.8-4.0)h line at subsequent visits. Another participant in this cohort after 15 daily 6.65, 13.3, 26.6, or 53.2 mg of mitragynine experienced low HR(not clinically significant),confirmed by doses. Steady-state concentrations were reached in 8-9 and an ECG indicating sinus bradycardia (not clinically signifi- 7 days with mitragynine and 7-OH-mitragynine,respectively. cant)on day 1 SD at 12 hours postdose. This participant was The mean 7-OH-mitragynine/mitragynine concentration withdrawn on day 14 MD before dosing due to a positive ratios were 0.20-0.31 after SD and 0.15-0.21 after MDs. alcohol test.

One participant receiving placebo and none receiving
active MitraLeaf had abnormal QTc. QTc >500 ms, the DISCUSSION suggested level of concern for prolonged QTc, was not The novel M.speciosa—derived MitraLeaf kratom pow- reported in any case. After receiving the highest der was well tolerated in the SD and MD ranges tested. No MitraLeaf dose, 1 participant had large but not clinically serious adverse events or deaths were reported. All 4 doses significant variations in BP and HR on days 1 and 3 SD. had a generally acceptable safety profile in vital signs, RR, This participant completed the study but reported anxiety in SpO2,and ECG.Across all cohorts,6 participants were with- the clinic that may have impacted BP and HR. Another drawn early, either voluntarily or at the PI's discretion, participant in this cohort who completed the study experi- because of TEAEs suspected to be related to the IP. The lack enced significantly increased HR on day 1 SD at 55 minutes of reported QTc abnormalities between the active and placebo postdose, representing a mild TEAE of tachycardia, which groups and of prolonged QTc suggests that mitragynine does resolved within 20 minutes. ECG results on day 1 SD pre- not significantly affect QTc duration, an important safety dose and day 1 of the follow-up phase at 12 hours postdose factor. for this participant indicated sinus bradycardia that was not TEAEs were generally mild,with a few moderate and 3 clinically significant. No specific changes in vital signs or severe TEAEs, namely, syncope during blood collection and increase in abnormal values were observed with increasing gastritis. No trend was observed in any vital sign assessment dose. There were no clinically significant findings or nota- or for increases in abnormal values with increasing dose. The ble differences from pooled placebo for respiratory function percentage of participants receiving active MitraLeaf reported and ECG after the administration of any active more TEAEs as the dose increased in the SD and MD phases.

MitraLeaf dose. The most common TEAEs in the SD and MD phases were 8 Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 Safety and Tolerability of Dried Kratom Leaf Powder nausea, dizziness, and headache, with additional common The liver panel comprised AST, ALT, ALP, TEAEs in the MD phase, including feeling hot, somnolence, g-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), and bilirubin (total, conju- and increased ALT. Taken together, the study findings are gated, direct, and unconjugated). Elevations in liver enzymes consistent with those of other studies and evaluations of may accompany injuries of the liver and other tissue damage kratom pharmacology and safety, which suggest that kratom (ie, muscle degradation, biliary obstruction) and are also intake at commonly consumed levels poses low acute-safety noted after alcohol consumption. Therefore, it is critical to risks.30 rule out other causes of elevations in individual liver enzymes This study was conducted in healthy, nonsmoking alone, as these cannot necessarily be attributed to DILI. individuals who did not use kratom recently, with all kratom Hy's Law is an interpretation of Zimmerman's obser- doses administered in the clinic and extensive collection of vation that pure hepatocellular injury sufficient to cause hy- safety data throughout the study. Additional studies are perbilirubinemia is an indicator of a drug's potential to cause needed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of well- serious liver injury.41 Thus, a concurrent finding of usually characterized kratom powder products in clinical populations substantial aminotransferase elevation with and chronic kratom users.This is the first controlled study of bilirubin >2xULN indicates a drug likely to cause severe multiple kratom powder doses, but despite the 23-day moni- DILI that is fatal or requiring transplantation. To date, the toring period after administering 15 daily kratom doses,pos- small number of Hy's Law cases identified in clinical trials sible long-term effects might not have been detected. of various drugs present modest signs of hepatocellular Potential conflicts of interest are clearly disclosed, including injury. As defined in the FDA's Guidance for Industry:
the study's funding by NP Pharma,and compensations given Drug-Induced Liver Injury Premarketing Clinical Evaluation to all authors for study design input and/or data analysis and (2009),42 3 criteria must be met for cases to fully adhere to publication. Hy's Law: (1)the drug causes hepatocellular injury indicated A few potential abuse—related TEAEs were observed in by an elevation of 3xULN ALT or AST levels compared with a greater percentage of participants in the active MitraLeaf placebo; (2) elevation in serum total bilirubin >2xULN is versus placebo groups;however,the primary potential abuse— also present for at least 1 trial participant showing elevations related TEAE of euphoric mood was reported in only 1 par- after product exposure;(3)no other reason explains increased ticipant receiving active SD and in 1 participant receiving levels of aminotransferases and total bilirubin, such as viral placebo. Euphoric mood was not reported by any participant hepatitis A, B, or C, preexisting or acute liver disease, or in the MD phase. a drug capable of causing the observed injury.

Regarding the frequency of clinically significant shifts Overall, there were no consistent trends across all in clinical chemical values, no consistent pattern was cohorts, or shifts from baseline to any postbaseline visit for observed in any of the formulations across the lower dose clinical chemistry parameters in participants who received groups. Results from the highest MitraLeaf dose group active MitraLeaf. None of the cases met the criteria of Hy's indicated increased incidence of clinically significant in- law or the FDA Guidance for DILI. AST or ALT elevations creases in liver function enzymes (ALT and/or AST) were >3xULN in 3 participants, >5xULN in 3 participants, compared with the lower dose groups; no participant and >10xULN in none of the participants receiving active receiving any active dose showed elevations of >3xULN MitraLeaf. Bilirubin elevations were not >2xULN in any ALT, ALP, or AST levels with >2xULN total bilirubin ley- participant. No combination of liver enzymes >3xULN and els, as per the US FDA's guidelines for drug-induced liver bilirubin >2xULN and no cases of AST or ALT >3xULN injury (DILI) caused by prescribed drugs.31 Monitoring of were observed in conjunction with elevated AST or ALT liver enzymes and total bilirubin levels is recommended in temporally associated with nausea, vomiting, anorexia, future clinical studies. abdominal pain, or fatigue. Furthermore, several participants Kratom was implicated in acute liver injury (mostly who received placebo also experienced elevated aminotrans- cholestatic), organ dysfunction,toxicity, coma, seizures, and, ferase levels that were of unclear etiology. AST, ALT, and in a rare case,acute liver failure resulting in the need for liver total bilirubin monitoring is recommended in future clinical transplantation.32,33 Case reports describe liver function studies. abnormalities associated with kratom use34-4°; however, as There are few data from randomized, placebo- the terminology varies in these reports, it is unclear whether controlled studies that address the cardiovascular effects of these abnormalities fall within the scope of sustained DILI or kratom or mitragynine. Therefore, it is important to examine acute and transient elevations of liver enzymes.Moreover,the the cardiovascular effects observed in the present study.In all case studies do not fully characterize the kratom substance the active MitraLeaf groups (n =49), 3 participants reported ingested, the concentrations of mitragynine and other alka- abnormal vital signs after receiving different MitraLeaf doses, loids, analysis of the product for adulteration or the presence all of which resolved, and they completed the study. The of contaminants, the dose consumed, and frequency of use. abnormalities resolved in 2 of the participants, who eventu- The issue of liver function abnormalities is closely examined ally completed the study, whereas 1 participant was with- in the present prospective study on the safety,tolerability,and drawn by the PI because of reasons unrelated to the pharmacokinetics of MitraLeaf. Due to the increased ALT abnormal findings. Three participants across all 67 placebo and/or AST levels after the ingestion of the highest active volunteers also reported abnormal vital signs.Individual plots MitraLeaf dose, all hepatic function data were carefully of the HR,DBP,and SBP of each participant showed no clear reviewed. change over time.

Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 9

Huestis et al Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 Evaluation of mitragynine and 7-OH-mitragynine con- 9. Stolt A-C,Schroder H,Neurath H,et al.Behavioral and neurochemical centrations in addition to the extensive data on TEAEs, vital characterization of kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) extract. signs, and hematological and clinical chemistry parameters Psycho A,Marcology.2014;231:13 25.

10. Varadi A,Manors GF,Palmer TC,et al. Mitragymne/Corynantheidine adds to the safety profile of the dried kratom leaf powder at pseudoindoxyls as opioid analgesics with Mu agonism and Delta antag- the administered doses of 6.65-53.2 mg of mitragynine. onism,which do not recruit 0-Arrestin-2.J Med Chem.2016;59:8381- Increases in mitragynine and 7-OH-mitragynine concentra- 8397.

11. Eastlack SC, Cornett EM, Kaye AD. Kratom-pharmacology, clinical tions were proportionate to the dose based on their Cmax implications,and outlook:a comprehensive review.Pain Ther.2020;9:
and slightly greater than dose-proportional based on the 55-69.

AUC.5 Mitragynine Tma,after single and multiple oral mitra- 12. Macko E,Weisbach JA,Douglas B.Some observations on the pharma- gynine doses ranged from 1.0 to 1.7 hours,with only slightly cology of mitragynine.Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1972;198:145-161. longer Tmax for 7-OH-mitragynine (1.2-2.0 hours). 13. Henningfield JE,Rodricks JV,Magnuson AM,et al.Respiratory effects Accumulation factors for mitragynine comparing Cmax and of oral mitragynine and oxycodone in a rodent model.

Psychopharmacology.2022;239:3793-3804.

AUC at steady state during MD with Cmax and AUC after 14. Henningfield JE,Wang DW,Huestis MA.Kratom abuse potential 2021:
a SD were low to moderate ranging from 1.0 to 1.3 and 1.6- an updated eight factor analysis.Front Pharmacol.2021;12:775073.

1.9, respectively. Corresponding ranges of 0.9-1.0 and 1.0- 15. Henningfield JE,Chawarski MC,Garcia-Romeu A,et al.Kratom with-

1.3 were observed for 7-OH-mitragine indicating no or low drawal: discussions and conclusions of a scientific expert forum. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep.2023;7:100142.
accumulation after multiple dosing. This study is the first to 16. Matsumoto K, Mizowaki M, Suchitra T,et al. Central antinociceptive provide complete data on the more potent 7-OH-mitragynine effects of mitragynine in mice:contribution of descending noradrenergic metabolite concentrations and 7-OH-mitragynine to mitragy- and serotonergic systems.Eur J Pharmacol. 1996;317:75-81. nine ratios in humans.7-OH-mitragynine concentrations were 17. Matsumoto K, Hone S,Takayama H,et al. Antinociception,tolerance always higher after SD compared with multiple mitragynine and withdrawal symptoms induced by 7-hydroxymitragynine,an alkaloid from the Thai medicinal herb Mitragyna speciosa.Life Sci.2005;78:2-7. doses, and the highest ratios were consistently observed after 18. Prozialeck WC,Jivan JK, Andurkar SV. Pharmacology of kratom: an lower rather than higher SD or MD. These data also confirm emerging botanical agent with stimulant, analgesic and opioid-like ef- the observed positive safety and tolerability profile across the fects.JAm Osteopath Assoc.2012;112:792-799.

19. Obeng S,Kamble SH,Reeves ME,et al.Investigation of the adrenergic administered mitragynine doses.
and opioid binding affinities,metabolic stability,plasma protein binding properties,and functional effects of selected indole-based kratom alka- loids.J Med Chem.2020;63:433-439.

CONCLUSIONS 20. Leon F,Obeng S, Mottinelli M, et al. Activity of Mitragyna speciosa This novel single- and multiple-dose randomized ("kratom") alkaloids at serotonin receptors. J Med Chem. 2021;64:
g p 13510-13523.
placebo-controlled, double-blind study shows that M. specio- 21. Trakulsrichai S,Sathirakul K,Auparakkitanon S,et al.Pharmacokinetics sa-derived MitraLeaf kratom powder was safe and well tol- of mitragynine in man.Drug Des Dev Ther.2015;9:2421-2429. erated at the dose ranges tested, with no evidence of 22. Tanna RS,Nguyen JT,Hadi DL,et al.Clinical pharmacokinetic assess- ment of kratom(Mitragyna speciosa),a botanical product with opioid- meaningful abuse potential or withdrawal.
like effects,in healthy adult participants.Pharmaceutics.2022;14:620.

23. Tanna RS,Cech NB,Oberlies NH,et al.Translating kratom-drug inter- actions:from bedside to bench and back.Drug Metab Dispos.2023;51:

REFERENCES 923-935.

1. Hassan Z,Muzaimi M,Navaratnam V,et al.From Kratom to mitragy- 24. US Food and Drug Administration(FDA)Guidance for Industry,drug- nine and its derivatives:physiological and behavioural effects related to induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation. FDA:2009. use,abuse,and addiction.Neurosci Biobehav Rev.2013;37:138-151. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/116737 . Accessed June 3,

2. McCurdy CR, Sharma A, Smith KE, et al. An update on the clinical 2025. pharmacology of kratom: uses, abuse potential, and future considers- 25. Sellers EM, Romach MK. Categorization of abuse potential-related tions.Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol.2024;17:131-142. adverse events. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev.2018;7:569-574.

3. Hernandez A.Kratom faces increasing scrutiny from states and the feds. 26. Kosten TR,Baxter LE.Review article:effective management of opioid Stateline. 2025. Available at: hops://stateline.org/2025/08/11/kratom- withdrawal symptoms:a gateway to opioid dependence treatment.Am J faces-increasing-scrutiny-from-states-and-the-feds. Accessed October 3, Addict.2019;28:55-62. 2025. 27. Bergfeldt L. Differential diagnosis of cardiogenic syncope and seizure

4. Expert Committee on Drug Dependence, World Health Organization. disorders.Heart.2003;89:353-358.

Pre-Review Report:Kratom(Mitragyna speciosa), Mitragynine, and 7- 28. ILAE. Epilepsy imitators; 2022. Available at: https://www . hydroxymitragynine, Forty-Fourth Meeting, Geneva, October II to 15; epilepsydiagnosis.org/epilepsy-imitators.html. Accessed August 10, 2021. 2025.

5. Beckett AH, Morton DM. The metabolism of corynantheidine and 9- 29. Huestis MA, Brett MA, Bothmer J, et al. Human mitragynine and 7- methoxycory-nantheidine-type alkaloids by liver microsomes. Biochem hydroxy-mitragynine pharmacokinetics after single and multiple daily Pharmacol. 1967;16:1609-1615. doses of oral encapsulated dried kratom leaf powder.Molecules.2024;

6. Kamble SH,Sharma A,King TI,et al. Metabolite profiling and identi- 29:984. fication of enzymes responsible for the metabolism of mitragynine,the 30. Henningfield JE,Grundmann 0,Huestis MA,et al.Kratom safety and major alkaloid of Mitragyna speciosa (kratom).Xenobiotica. 2019;49: toxicology in the public health context:research needs to better inform 1279-1288. regulation.Front Pharmacol.2024;15:1403140.

7. Zhang M,Sharma A,Leon F,et al.Effects of nutrient fertility on growth 31. US Food and Drug Administration(FDA)Guidance for Industry,drug- and alkaloidal content in Mitragyna speciosa(kratom).Front Plant Sci. induced Liver injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation. FDA; 2009. 2020;11:597696. Available at: hops:// www.fda.gov/media/116737/download . Accessed

8. Kruegel AC, Gassaway MM, Kapoor A, et al. Synthetic and receptor June 3,2025. signaling explorations of the Mitragyna alkaloids: mitragynine as an 32. Roma K, Mohammed S, Sieck B, et al. Kratom-induced acute liver atypical molecular framework for opioid receptor modulators. J Am injury:a case study and the importance of herbal supplement regulation.

Chem Soc.2016;138:6754-6764. J Hepatol.2023;79:581-584. 10 Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Ther Drug Monit • Volume 00, Number 00, Month 2026 Safety and Tolerability of Dried Kratom Leaf Powder

33. Hillman L,Gottfried M,Whitsett M,et al.Clinical features and outcomes opioid epidemic. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2019;7:
of complementary and alternative medicine induced acute liver failure 2324709619826167. and injury.Am J Gastroenterol.2016;111:958-965. 39. Botejue M,Walia G,Shahin 0,et al.Kratom-induced liver injury:a case

34. Kapp FG, Maurer HH,Auwarter V, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis fol- series and clinical implications. Cureus.2021;13:e14679. lowing abuse of powdered kratom(Mitragyna speciosa).J Med Toxicol. 40. Ahmad J, Odin JA, Hayashi PH, et al. Liver injury associated with 2011;7:227-231. kratom, a popular opioid-like product: experience from the U.S. drug

35. Riverso M,Chang M,Soldevila-Pico C,et al.Histologic characterization induced liver injury network and a review of the literature. Drug of kratom use-associated liver injury.Gastroenterol Res.2018;11:79-82. Alcohol Depend.2021;218:108426.

36. Aldyab M,Ells PF,Bui R,et al.Kratom-induced cholestatic liver injury 41. Cohen EB,Lewis JH. Modifying Hy's law and eDISH for the modern mimicking anti-mitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cholan- idiosyncratic DILI era.Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol.2025;21:1159— gitis:a case report and review of literature.Gastroenterol Res.2019;12: 1168. 211-215. 42. United States Food and Drug Administration(FDA).Assessment of

37. Femandes CT,Iqbal U,Tighe SP,et al.Kratom-induced cholestatic liver Abuse Potential of Drugs: Guidance for Industry; 2017. injury and its conservative management.J Investig Med High Impact United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available Case Rep.2019;7:2324709619836138. at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-

38. Osborne CS,Overstreet AN,Rockey DC,et al.Drug-induced liver injury documents/assessment-abuse-potential-drugs. Accessed August caused by kratom use as an alternative pain treatment amid an ongoing 10,2025.

Copyright©2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 11

From: Randi Hartman <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 12:51 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: RE: Ordinance # 2026-01"
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the Council,
My name is Randi Campos, and I am writing to respectfully ask that you do not support a ban on Natural Kratom.

While I do not personally use kratom, I have seen firsthand the positive impact it has had on people I love. Most importantly, my husband struggled for years with alcoholism, and kratom played a key role in helping him become sober.Today, he is healthy, stable, and a very present father to our three children.

Our family's life has been changed for the better because of it.

That said, I strongly support regulating or prohibiting Synthetic products, such as 7-OH extracts, which are currently being sold throughout California. I have personally seen these products harm friends and loved ones, and I do not believe they should be available.

I respectfully ask that you consider the difference between natural kratom leaf and dangerous synthetic products, and allow responsible adults continued access to natural kratom while addressing the real risks posed by synthetics.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Randi Campos
Yahoo Mail: Search,Organize, Conquer

From: Anthony Rosa <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 12:47 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 312-26 - Public Comment
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Mayor, Councilmembers, and staff—
My name is Anthony Rosa, and I'm a lifelong California resident. I'm 29 years old, and I've been a kratom user for six years. I'm not here to defend synthetic 7-hydroxy derivatives—I've never used them, and I fully agree they should be restricted. But please don't punish responsible adults who use natural kratom leaf powder. It's a mild, traditional plant that has been safely used for generations. Kratom is NOT 7-OH.

I still struggle every day with anxiety, stress, and depression. The pressure of my life is constant—but kratom is what gets me through it. It's the only thing that keeps me functional, stable, and able to provide for my family.Without it, I would likely fall back into alcoholism.

Kratom didn't turn me into an addict—It helped me overcome crippling lethargy, rebuild my motivation, and become a small business owner. I am living proof that kratom can save lives.

Lumping lab-tested kratom leaf together with synthetic 7-OH is a scientific and moral mistake.Those synthetic capsules contain up to a thousand times the alkaloid concentration of natural kratom powder.

Even The federal dept of health and human services. reached out to the state in late September urging California to make that distinction clear.Texas chose a 7OH limit over a blanket ban. Why can't we?The actions of our state public health department are authoritarian, and are not making that distinction.

How can we allow adults to legally buy alcohol and cigarettes—substances proven to kill—yet criminalize a natural plant that helps people live?
Please, Do not force people like me back into despair and addiction.

Thank you for your time and compassion.

Anthony Rosa
Sonoma State University Alumni
BS in Business Administration -Management
1 ill: (
Work Email: [email protected]
School Email: [email protected]
2 From: Abdullah Mamun <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 12:17 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: I oppose the bill to Ban Natural Kratom
Attachments: The Abuse Potential of 7-Hydroxymitragyine (7-OH) According to the 8 Factors of the Controlled Substances Act FOR SUBMISSION Final.pdf; 7oh.png; 5303320240508.pdf
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern:

I am Abdullah Mamun,the owner of Authentic Kratom. For the past 12 years, I have operated as a responsible kratom retailer, committed to consumer safety,transparency, and regulatory compliance. I appreciate the City of Temecula for bringing this important matter forward for discussion. I plan to attend in-person, but just in case sending my comment prior hand.

I respectfully oppose the proposed ordinance to ban "kratom products," as the current language lacks clarity and risks unintentionally prohibiting natural kratom,which has been safely used by millions of Americans for decades. I believe this issue requires careful distinction between natural kratom and synthetic 7- hydroxymitragynine(commonly known as 7-OH)products.

Imagine the coffee we drink every morning.We all know it's comes from coffee beans. Many of us like stronger coffee,then there's coffee extracts (espresso shots)etc, it's still coffee.What if someone takes one of the alkaloids out of coffee plant and starts selling the adulterated product and calling it coffee.Would you ban the natural coffee?
If your answer is No,then we are on the same page!This is exactly what's happening here with Kratom.So,if you are concerned about your localpublic,which I am ure you are,then ban the synthetic adulterated 7oh products,not the natural form of kratom.

Kratom is a natural botanical derived from Mitragyna speciosa, a plant belonging to the same plant family as coffee(Rubiaceae).Traditionally, kratom leaves are brewed into tea and consumed in many parts of Southeast Asia and the United States. Many consumers use kratom for energy,focus, and overall wellness, and in my personal experience, it has been helpful in managing chronic back discomfort.

Kratom contains multiple naturally occurring alkaloids,the primary ones being mitragynine and 7- hydroxymitragynine(7-OH). In natural kratom leaf powder, capsules, and even extracts, mitragynine is the dominant alkaloid,while 7-OH is present only in trace amounts. I have included laboratory test results demonstrating the full alkaloid profile of our products,which confirms these trace levels.

In contrast,around 2023,certain manufacturers began producing synthetic pills/liquids labeled as"7-OH", containing unnaturally high concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine.These products do not reflect the natural composition of kratom and represent a fundamentally different—and far more concerning—category.

Research conducted by Dr. Chris McCurdy of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, a leading authority in kratom science, has identified unknown and potentially dangerous chemical constituents in these synthetic 7-OH products(see attached study).Additionally, a comprehensive 8-factor abuse liability analysis 1 conducted by Dr.Jack Henningfield and colleagues concluded that synthetic 7-OH presents a significantly elevated risk profile compared to natural kratom (see attached).

Furthermore, during a public press conference on July 29,2025,the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) explicitly stated that natural kratom containing trace levels of 7-OH is not their regulatory target, and instead recommended that the DEA focus enforcement efforts on banning synthetic 7-OH products.

In summary,the emerging public health concerns are not caused by natural kratom, but rather by synthetic, chemically manipulated 7-OH products. I strongly urge the City of Orange to consider legislation that specifically bans synthetic 7-OH,while preserving legal access to natural kratom for the thousands of responsible adults who rely on it to maintain their quality of life—particularly when traditional treatments have failed.

That said, I fully support reasonable regulation of kratom, including strict age requirements, proper labeling, laboratory testing, and consumer education.At Authentic Kratom,we already enforce a minimum purchase age of 21, provide transparent labeling, and conduct rigorous third-party laboratory testing.

Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.

Abdullah
Abdullah Mamun
President/CEO
© Authentic Kratom
13818-334-2140 1323-309-1945
®[email protected]
el www.authentickratom.com
El7834 Alabama Ave, Canoga Park, Ca
91304
2 UPLC-PDA-Q-TOF finger printing of authentic kratom samples (left) and 7-QHMZ tablet (right) (Several unknown compounds were identified in 7-QHMZ tablet, and 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-HMG) was not present in kratom leaf sample.)
.,0; •E S7 6PC Sun i r.p.7 n OV 702110/6 1s.r4 Sample.01242021 S-14414 04• •,,, •E 37 OPC Ec4r s ra; —______- .__ _._ 105 706
r 7
0 65 0115
0° °• 7-HMO
O 7450 SS
0 1 0116 4
on o75
07 07
065 —19646 065
7-HMG was not available
06 in fresh kratom leaf °S
045 045
04 04
0 15 1 0 VS
°' 0
1 - Unknown
o'; j '� Unknown ""
0 16 1 <P 0 16
0 05 i ii•i �ii o os 1 11 li 1 2 3 4 6 • • • M Si a a Le 2 1 • 6 • 6 • 10 11 17 U M 0077119 M w•67ouoloo TooOr• Came w•o00mo6 Time Oro IF I Co ohrmy
UNIVERSITYllege f P
of a FLORIUacA

Work Order ID:15002056-Sample Id:104658-Received Date:20MAY2024-Issued Date:23MAY2024-Page:1 Certificate of Analysis ©oFcild@ng@
Customer Information Testing Facility
Lab: Cora Science, LLC
Client: Authentic Kratom
Attention: (323) 309-1945 Address 8000 Anderson Square, STE 113 Address: 7834 Alabama Ave Austin,Texas 78757 Canoga Park, CA 91304 Contact: [email protected] (512) 856-5007
Sample Image(s) Sample Information
Name: Bali Yellow Vein Kratom
— Lot Number: 5303320240508
1 Description: Finely ground plant material
Condition: Good
i, . . ..

Job ID: 15002056
Sample ID: 104658
Received: 20MAY2024
Completed: 22MAY2024
Issued: 23MAY2024
Test Results
Mitragyna Alkaloids (UHPLC-DAD) Method Code: T102 Tested: 22MAY2024 10103 PARAMETER SPECIFICATION RESULT UNIT LOQ NOTES Mitragynine Report Results 1.39 w/w% 0.011 N/A 7-Hydroxymitragynine Report Results <LOQ w/w% 0.003 N/A Paynantheine Report Results 0.260 w/w% 0.011 N/A Speciogynine Report Results 0.207 w/w% 0.011 N/A Speciociliatine Report Results 0.348 w/w% 0.011 N/A Total Mitragyna Alkaloids Report Results 2.21 w/w% 0.011 N/A Elemental Impurities (ICP-MS) Method Code: T301 Tested: 21MAY2024 11821 PARAMETER SPECIFICATION RESULT UNIT LOQ NOTES Arsenic NMT 10 0.37 ug/day 0.030 PASS Cadmium NMT 4.1 0.11 ug/day 0.010 PASS Lead NMT 6.0 2.1 ug/day 0.010 PASS Mercury NMT 2.0 0.10 ug/day 0.010 PASS Additional Report Notes
T301 result, unit, and LOQ converted from ug/g to ug/day using a maximum permitted daily exposure of 5.0 g/day.

Revision History
rev 00-Initial release.

This report,prepared by Cora Science.LLC,shall not be reproduced except in its entirety without prior written approval.All test articles are analyzed as received and the results relate only to the specific sample of material or product analyzed.Test methods are performed in a laboratory accredited to I50/IEC 17025:2017 in the field of testing by PJLA(Accreditation#116374)or a registered outsourcing facility.Some test methods reported may fall outside the scope of L22-250 supplement.

Work Order ID:15002056-Sample Id:104658-Received Date:20MAY2024-Issued Date:23MAY2024-Page:2 Abbreviations
ID: identification, N/A: not applicable, LOQ: limit of quantitation, CFU: colony forming units, w/w%: weight by weight percent, mg: milligrams, g: grams, ug: micrograms, mL: milliliters, ND: not detected, <LOQ: below limit of quantitation, NMT: no more than, NIT: no less than, UHPLC: ultra-high performance liquid chromatography, GC: gas chromatography, DAD: diode array detection/detector, MS: mass spectroscopy/spectrometer, ICP: inductively coupled plasma, ISO: International Organization for Standardization, USP: United States Pharmacopeia
Authorization
This report has been authorized for release from Cora Science by:

Signature: � ^'� /�,,� Position: Laboratory Director Department: Management
Name: Tyler West Date: 23MAY2024
This report,prepared by Cora Science,LLC,shall not be reproduced except in its entirety without prior written approval.All test articles are analyzed as received and the results relate only to the specific sample of material or product analyzed.Test methods are performed in a laboratory accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 in the field of testing by PJLA(Accreditation#116374)or a registered outsourcing facility.Some test methods reported may fall outside the scope of L22-250 supplement.

From: Cassandra Seel <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 12:08 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: RE: Ordinance #2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern:

My name is Cassandra Seel, and I am writing today to give you some insight into natural leaf Kratom. I understand there is legitimate concern about the synthetic form, better known as 7-OH; however, I'd like to stress that conflating the two is not appropriate, as there are stark differences.

Natural leaf Kratom has been safely used as a supplement, providing many benefits and negligible side effects for many years, with a documented history reaching back to the 1800's. As someone who has ADHD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder, natural leaf Kratom has helped me manage both without any negative effects or"high" as may be experienced with other remedies. I am a full-time college student with a 3.89 GPA, studying Law and Criminal Justice. I am a mother to three children and am a freelancer.

Kratom has only served to help me in my endeavors.

While the headlines regarding 7-OH have been scary, I'd like to point out that the reason for its safety issues stems from the science of its makeup.The synthetic version of Kratom can have up to 98% of 7- OH.This is drastically higher than natural leaf Kratom, which has a level of around .05%.According to Pharmacy Times, synthetic Kratom has levels up to 13 times stronger than Morphine and more than 100 times greater than the natural leaf Kratom. The extreme levels of 7-OH in synthetic Kratom are associated with health problems such as breathing problems, agitation, seizures, hypertension, tachycardia, and even death. However,when we look at natural Kratom,we find that "...studies have shown low doses of mitragynine (i.e., 553.2 mg from 54,000 mg dried kratom leaves per person) to be well tolerated among study subjects (Huestis et al., 2024; Prevete et al., 2024). In a single- ascending dose pilot study, no adverse effects among the study's subjects were observed, including at the highest dose administered (24 capsules per person, which equates to 12 g of kratom), though nausea was noted at this dose (Altasciences Company Inc., 2024; Reissig et al., 2024)." The FDA has also noted this distinction, stating that while it recommends placing synthetic 7-OH products on its list of Schedule 1 Narcotics, they do not want the same outcome for natural Kratom.

An article by PBS highlights the Federal Government's opinion by stating, "In recent months, dietary supplement companies that sell kratom have been urging the Food and Drug Administration to crack down on the products containing 7-OH, portraying it as a dangerously concentrated, synthetic form of the original ingredient. The FDA action is not focused on natural kratom leaf products." Furthermore, "The agency said it was releasing a report to educate about the risks of"7-OH and its distinction from the kratom plant leaf."
1 In conclusion, while synthetic forms of Kratom have the potential to be very dangerous, the same can not be said for natural leaf Kratom. There is an understandable reason to ban the synthetic form of 7-OH products, and there is even an argument to be made regarding the regulation of Kratom, but the data to suggest that natural Kratom should be banned or put into the same category as synthetic 7-OH products is simply not there. Moreso, doing so would take away a form of medicinal support from many natural leaf Kratom users who find its benefits to improve their lives.

Thank you for your consideration and careful exploration of the differences between synthetic 7-OH products and natural leaf Kratom.

Regards,
Cassandra Seel
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/u-s-health-officials-cracking-down-on-kratom-related-products https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1620601/full https://www.ahpa.org/blog home.asp?display=341
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/ban-synthetic-7-oh-natural-leaf-kratom-presents-no-major- health-
risk#:—:text=7%2DOH%20vs%20Natural%20Kratom.entourage%20effect%20from%20natu ral%20alkalo ids.&text=Synthetic%20concentrated%207%2DOH%20opioid%20products%20have%20recently%20be en%20associated,need%20for%20controlled%20substance%20scheduling. 2 From: Letty <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 11:58 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: RE: Ordinance # 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor and Members of the Temecula City Council,
I am writing today not as an activist or business owner, but simply as a concerned citizen who deeply cares about the well-being of others in our community.

For many people, natural kratom is not a recreational substance—it is a lifeline. It helps individuals manage chronic pain, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. For others, it has played a critical rote in helping them step away from opioids, alcohol, and other far more dangerous substances.These are real people—parents,veterans, workers, and seniors—who are simply trying to live functional, healthy lives.

A full ban on kratom would not eliminate demand. It would only push people toward black-market sources or back toward prescription opioids and street drugs,which are demonstrably more harmful.The unintended consequences of a ban could be devastating for individuals who are finally stable, productive, and hopeful again.

It is incredibly important to separate natural kratom leaf from high-potency extracts and synthetic isolates, especially products containing artificially elevated levels of 7-hydroxymitragynine(7-OH).These are fundamentally different substances with very different risk profiles.Targeted regulation of high-potency products makes sense.A blanket ban on natural kratom does not.

Please consider thoughtful, compassionate regulation—including age limits, product testing, labeling, and limits on 7-OH concentration—instead of an outright ban.This approach protects public safety while preserving access for those who truly depend on this plant to maintain their quality of life.

I respectfully ask you to consider the very real human impact of this decision.

Thank you for your time, care,and service to your community. 1 From: Norman Bamford <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 11:32 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear city council
It has come to my attention that there is a proposed ban on kratom, I am hoping that you will consider not passing this ordinance. Kratom is a natural plant from south east Asia that has been used as a natural tea and herb for thousands of years. Many people have seen the benefits of this wonderful plant. I am well aware of the synthetic stuff that is now available and has been proven to be harmful but the natural plant should be protected so people have a natural alternative to many different conditions. With health care being so unaffordable people need to be able to rely on natural wholistic home remedies that they find helpful.

Norman E Bamford
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
1 From: Shane Maciel <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 11:00 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Raw Leaf Kratom vs 7oh. Please Read
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern,
Thank you for taking the time to hear this written request. I am writing to advocate for raw leaf kratom,asking that the board consider regulating raw leaf kratom while outright banning the synthetic product known as"7-OH." Currently,there is widespread misinformation/miseducation in the public media regarding kratom's safety.

Unfortunately,the synthetic product 7-OH has appeared in smoke shops across America,marketed as a kratom product over the last 2 years causing problems with break-ins at smoke shops(to steal the product)concerns of children under the influence while also possibly being linked to some overdose deaths;.

Most 7-OH products are displayed alongside Raw Leaf Kratom products misleading consumers all the more while also trying to entice the younger under aged consumers with brightly colored packaging using familiar cartoon characters and grandiose wording to further entice others who are not looking for a maintenance level adjustment but seeking more of a"trainwreck"like experience.

While 7-OH shares a common alkaloid with kratom,it is in fact a very different substance—chemically manipulated and derived from compounds similar to those found in pool-cleaning solvents. It is far stronger and far more dangerous than natural kratom.

There is several years of reliable scientific fact based evidence of raw leaf kratom's safety and use over 100 to possibly thousands of years.Used for pain management,mood enhancement,energy or even soothing withdrawal symptoms for those with SUD. Kratom has been a savior for millions in America allowing them to remain in the community as productive individuals seeking self help and independence.

And you may hear from organizations like"Mothers Against Kratom."or the"Kratom Danger Awareness"group that have testified in Congress and receiving support from state legislatures and others who have professional medical license to push for kratom bans.

At the same time,not recognizing,ignoring,or are they possibly being misled that the pharmaceutical interests—including those tied to opioid treatment medications like Suboxone—have financial incentives to oppose kratom's legalization?.Medical professionals prefer medications over nature though the natural supplements come with far less side effects or adverse effects as compared to medications such as Suboxone. Relying on shorter trial times than that of kratom's known historical use is several countries as well as information available in the U.S.If one would"Follow the money"funding these advocacy groups,much of their support is coming from these medical professional groups standing on their"institutional and clinical success"within the prescription treatment regime and(ironically)their stance that addiction is the problem and not the initial prescribing issues,be it the weaning or length or strength of initial prescription that got the patient needing treatment in the first place.

I respectfully ask that you consider the lead of the several states across the US that have adopted Kratom Consumer Protection Act- style regulations,ensuring safe access to raw leaf kratom while banning 7-OH altogether.

Raw leaf kratom has been shown to provide beneficial and positive support for harm reduction,particularly for individuals struggling with opioid use disorders and chronic pain.

The FDA itself has recognized the potential benefits of raw leaf kratom and does not consider it a significant threat to public safety in the way that 7-OH currently is.
1 Please take into Consideration:

Not a Controlled Substance:Kratom is not scheduled under the federal Controlled Substances Act(CSA).An attempt by the DEA to place its active compounds(mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine)on Schedule I in 2016 was withdrawn after significant public and congressional opposition.

FDA Position:The FDA has not approved kratom for any medical use and states it is not lawfully marketed as a drug,dietary supplement,or food additive.The FDA has issued import alerts and seized products due to safety concerns and potential contamination(e.g.,with Salmonella or heavy metals).

Ongoing Research: Federal agencies like the National Institute on Drug Abuse(NIDA)are funding research into kratom's potential benefits and risks,including its use for pain relief and opioid withdrawal management.

Focus on 7-OH:The FDA is currently focused on the active compound 7-hydroxymitragynine(7-OH),especially concentrated or synthetic forms found in many commercial products,recommending it be scheduled as a controlled substance due to its potent opioid-like effects.

Regulation(Kratom Consumer Protection Act):Many states have adopted versions of the American Kratom Association's(AKA) Kratom Consumer Protection Act(KCPA),which aims to regulate the product rather than ban it:

Age Restrictions: Prohibits sales to individuals under 18 or 21 years of age.

Labeling and Packaging:Requires labels to list all ingredients,the amount of mitragynine and 7-OH content,serving sizes,and manufacturer information.

Product Quality&Testing: Bans the sale of adulterated or contaminated products and mandates testing for heavy metals and pathogens(e.g.,Salmonella).

Synthetic Alkaloids:Prohibits synthetic kratom or products with unnaturally high concentrations of 7-OH.

Misleading Claims:Forbids unproven claims about treating medical conditions or diseases.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Respectfully,
Shane Maciel
**********************
2 From:

Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 10:56 AM
To: Council Comments
Cc: Dr. Heidi Sykora
Subject: Please VOTE NO - ORDINANCE NO. 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula City Council.

Please do not pass Ordinance 2026-01(as written) in your council meeting today. The majority of the language in the ordinance is very good. You have properly identified that 7-OH and synthetics are dangerous and should be removed from store shelves. These are the products that should be banned....not natural leaf kratom. Natural leaf kratom has only trace amounts of 7-OH present.

In the ordinance you mention the following:

E. On October 28,2025, Riverside County adopted Ordinance No. 1004, which prohibits the sale and distribution of kratom products containing more than two percent(2%)of 7-OH in the alkaloid fraction to individuals under 21 years of age.

The Riverside Ordinance only bans products that fall about the 2% alkaloid fraction. This means 7- OH. They did not ban natural leaf kratom. I know that your intent is to pass a good law that will protect your citizens. The other cities who have passed 7-OH bans and regulated whole leaf kratom are: Orange County, Huntington Beach, Fresno City, Fresno County, Riverside, Laguna Niguel. By passing good regulation and not a comprehensive ban,you are protecting consumers that rely on natural leaf kratom and removing the dangerous products from the shelves.

Section 7. Section 8.56.030 (Possession, storage, provision, sale and distribution of synthetic drugs or Kratom products prohibited) of Chapter 8.56 (Psychoactive Products and Other Synthetic Drugs) of Title 8 (Business License and Regulations) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows, with the remainder of Section 8.56.030 remaining unchanged: .
"A. It is unlawful for any person to possess, store, provide, distribute or sell any synthetic drug or Kratom product within the city. Remove the language in red and add the following language instead:
....distribute or sell any synthetic kratom alkaloid products such as 7-OH, pseudoindoxyl, MGM 15 & MGM 16 within the city.

B. It is unlawful for any person to store, provide, sell or distribute or to permit the storage, provision, sale or distribution of synthetic drugs or Kratom products from any real property owned, possessed, managed or controlled by that person in the city. 4
1 D. The enforcing officer may consider any of the following evidentiary factors to determine if the product is a synthetic drug or Kratom product:

D(8). Merely disclaiming a synthetic drug or Kratom product as "not safe for human consumption" will not avoid the application of this section."
Section 8. Section 8.56.050 (Public nuisance) of Chapter 8.56 (Psychoactive Products and Other Synthetic Drugs) of Title 8 (Business License and Regulations) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
"A. It is a public nuisance for any person to provide, distribute, or sell any prohibited synthetic drug or Kratom product.

B. It is a public nuisance for any person to allow the provision, distribution, or sale of any prohibited synthetic drug or Kratom product on property owned, controlled or managed by such person.

C. It is a public nuisance for any person to provide, distribute, or sell any substance claimed or represented to be a prohibited synthetic drug or Kratom product.

D. It is a public nuisance for any person to allow the provision, distribution, or sale of any substance claimed or represented to be a prohibited synthetic drug or Kratom product on property owned, controlled or managed by such person.

E. The storage, provision, sale or distribution of any synthetic drug or Kratom product from any property, structure or building in the city is declared to be a public nuisance." Why a Natural Kratom Ban Will Not Reduce Harm
I understand why concerns arise. What I have seen across the country, however, is that the greatest risks come from unregulated products—items that are contaminated, adulterated, or chemically altered in ways that do not resemble natural kratom leaf.

At the same time, researchers in the U.S. and internationally have now published hundreds of peer-reviewed studies on kratom's chemistry, pharmacology, patterns of use, and public-health impacts. This research consistently shows:
• Natural kratom leaf contains several active plant compounds, and its primary alkaloid does not activate the same biological pathway responsible for dangerous opioid-type respiratory depression.
• Preclinical studies demonstrate lower addiction potential than traditional opioids. • Large national surveys show that many adults use natural kratom leaf to improve daily functioning or reduce reliance on more dangerous substances. • A recent randomized, double-blind human study of encapsulated kratom leaf powder found that single and multiple daily doses were well tolerated,with no serious short-term safety concerns.
• Across the literature, the most serious harms are linked to adulterated, contaminated, or synthetic products, not natural kratom leaf used in a regulated marketplace.

A possession and sales ban of natural kratom do not eliminate these risks. It simply removes the city's ability to set standards, require testing, or restrict dangerous derivatives. Consumers turn to illicit markets, and the city loses all oversight.

It is important to note that 7-OH products have no safety record, no science, and these products have been shown to cause respiratory depression.
2 Regulation Gives You Tools; Prohibition Takes Them Away A regulatory approach—rather than prohibition—gives Temecula meaningful tools to protect residents.A local ordinance modeled on the Kratom Consumer Protection Act(KCPA)allows the city to:
• Set age limits
• Require product testing
• Ensure accurate labeling
• Place limits on high-potency extracts
• Explicitly prohibit synthetic or semi-synthetic derivatives like 7-OH, pseudoindoxyl and MGM 15& 16.

This approach targets the actual sources of harm while preserving access to natural, plant-based products that many adults already use responsibly. Balanced evidence-informed regulation protects residents far more effectively than prohibition.

Thank you for your time and for considering a practical, public-health-focused path forward.We are happy to provide kratom education, additional materials, answer questions, or assist with ordinance refinement.

Lora Romney
President- IPHA
801-557-1144
International
Plata 6 Herbal
��s. .,,r —ALLIANCE
0 ' Virus-free. www.avast.com
3 From:

Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 10:39 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Kratom vs 7oh synthetics
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Dijon Evans and I am a California resident who is very concerned about this potential ban on kratom products.

Kratom has literally saved my life and given me the hope that I had lost due to the opioid epidemic and my medical history, losing the pain meds, because of the new opioid laws and the inhumane new rules that
no longer permitted patients such as myself and millions of others who were also cut off from the opioid medications due to the illegal selling of opioids by the illegitimate sales of the medications, the illegal prescriptions that were given to those who absolutely didn't need them, but they were obtaining them in order to sell them to those who were trying to make a lot of money by selling them to those who were either addicted to illicit drugs or those who were now desperate because they had been cut off of the medications that they had Legitimate reasons for taking them and had been given Legitimate prescriptions for years, sometimes decades by doctors for Legitimate reasons. I was injured when I had just turned 16. I had a short leg cast put on too tight and it killed the nerves and cut off the circulation.

The cast was only on for 4 days, but that was over 3 days too long.After that first week we were told that I was going to end up losing my leg, but I said that that wasn't going to happen! I was wrong!
The top specialists had tried to save my leg for 10 years. Doing experimental surgeries and procedures, doing procedures that at the time were considered to be the correct procedures, surgeries and the proper treatments, but now we know that those only made the situation worse and made the nerve damage spread throughout my body, and the 10 years that my leg remained on, only helped to spread the infections, pulmonary embolisms, sepsis, gangrene, deep vein thrombosis,and allowed the osteomyelitis to find a place to hide in my system. It doesn't take much of an injury, a simple bruising to a bone, or just a bruise to anywhere and it leads to another bout of osteomyelitis ( bone infection).

I have been legally dead several times and on my deathbed several other times.

I have full body CRPS with organ involvement, optical, occipital and trigeminal Neuralgia, multiple organ failure, and I have had more than 240 surgeries and procedures.

I wasn't supposed to live to be 30, but here I am after a very difficult 30 years beyond that age, several near death escapes, and I just turned 62. I have had amputations, pulmonary embolisms, sepsis, gangrene, 17 bouts of osteomyelitis and now also have osteonecrosis of my jaw, sinuses and facial bones, including the left inner ear, and soon to be the right. It is now affecting the entire inside of my skull, the soft inner bones.There is nothing that can be done for me because I am too high risk for the needed surgeries to repair my skull and inner ears. They can't do surgery because of the extremely high 1 risk that I will develop osteomyelitis of my skull and the chance that it will lead to the infection of my brain. If by chance that I don't develop osteomyelitis, there's an even higher risk that the surgical bone placement would fail because of the necrosis.

The only places that could put me into a medically induced coma and provide prophylaxis antibiotic treatment, and then do the surgery while still keeping me in a comatose state, are far enough away that I would have to be flown there. This cannot be done because I don't have any bone in-between my brain and inner ear that we need to provide the protection to our brain when we experience the pressure changes while in flight. So, now with everything else that I have encountered and fought to live through, I am nearing the end of the road. Not just because of my medical conditions, but because of my age. For over 15 years I was bedridden and unable to care for myself. Everything had to be done for me, and it included in home nursing care for the PICC lines..

My daughter has lived with this her entire life. My grandkids have as well! James, my partner has been subjected to this the entire time that he has known me and he's been an amazing, loving and caring man who has taken very good care of me! He's been subjected to so very much! So many times he has been told that he needed to say his goodbye to me because I wouldn't make it through the night. But each and every time that I pulled through the night- I would wake up to him holding my hand, watching me and crying tears of joy as I would open my eyes. Each time he would explain to me why I was in CCU, and he would begin to tell me what happened.

Each time he would just look at me and tell me how much he loved me.

When opioids were removed from the picture, even though I was diagnosed as a terminal patient, but because I wasn't a terminal cancer patient- so I wouldn't be able to get through the worst known painful conditions that are known to us, this is what I experience. Every single second of every single day. Every single second of every minute. Every minute of every hour. Every hour of each day of every month.. Every month of each year.. Decade after Decade for the past 46 years.

It feels like I am being electrocuted from the inside out and that my tissues are being seared together.

That's on a good day! Unfortunately I had reached the point where I felt that I was not able to take it anymore and I was ready to take my own life.This has been very difficult to admit because I have a beautiful daughter, and 3 beautiful grandchildren, and an amazing man that I love and he loves me! I have so very much to live for! But each time something else happened, I could see what my health was doing to them and every other person that I love , have loved; I was able to see what it was doing to them, in their eyes. Each time I felt like I was being electrocuted, I felt as if it was going through my body and directly into them. It wasn't only killing me, but it was chasing everyone that I loved- right out of my life.

After the first amputation, I spent most of my younger years in college and then medical school. I thrived in college! I was so happy and I felt better than I had in years! But when I was in college, I was in a extremely abusive marriage and I was seriously injured,which made the damage spread through my upper arms and body. I ended up taking a medical leave of absence, but I was very good at research,so when the word kratom was introduced to me, I researched everything that I could find out about kratom! After several months of researching it, talking to my medical team, my mentors, and my family- I decided that if I was going to look at ending my own life, that kratom would definitely be worth a shot.

I ordered some pure, unadulterated kratom leaf powder from a reputable vendor and waited. Because of a holiday, and a long weekend- it took longer than expected to arrive.

I had already thought that kratom was just a scam anyway... another" get rich scam.. a way for unscrupulous people to take advantage of very desperate people who were in serious pain,looking for a way to find anything to help.. even just a little bit: I held no HOPE that it would help.

I was, after all from the science background and I held no belief in dietary supplements. 2 I have spent the past 9 years eating crow for that lack of belief because as I said,I didn't believe in it AT ALL!!
BUT AS I SAID, KRATOM QUITE LITERALLY SAVED MY LIFE! I was leaving the house to follow through with my plans to take my own life when the mailman showed up with my first package. I WAS LESS THAN A HALF HOUR AWAY FROM TAKING MY OWN LIFE!!
SUCH A DIFFICULT THING TO SAY!!
I HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO LOSE, BUT EVERYTHING TO GAIN by going back in the house and trying kratom. I did.

I AM SO INCREDIBLY GRATEFUL THAT I DID!!
Approximately 20 minutes later my pain was at a tolerable level. Instead of being in bed, crying and begging for the torture to end, James came home and found me sitting on the couch smiling.

He knelt beside me and cried.

He knew that the kratom had arrived and that it was helping! Kratom doesn't get rid of all of my pain, but it allows me to be at tolerable levels.

I was never supposed to live to be 30 years old, and I have fought very hard to live. For the past 9 years I have been able to experience the miracles of life that most people take for granted.

In approximately 15 days, I will be able to see what I was never going to be able to see-the miracle of the birth of my Great Granddaughter. This is what kratom has given me. Please don't ban kratom products. Regulations are what we need, not prohibition!! We need to get rid of 7-OH Synthetic products.

Thank you very much!
Dijon Evans
Sent from my Galaxy
3 From: Nicole Damron <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 10:35 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance #2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello I'm writing to you to let you know how much leaf kratom has saved me . I've had several surgeries and was on pain killers prescription narcotic pain meds for years and then suboxone for pain .1 have been taking natural leaf kratom for over 3 years now and have cut put all prescription medication and never felt better. I understand that 7oh is bad and something needs to be done about it but the whole leaf kratom is not the same thing. Alot of us can function normal and be active because of kratom please don't ban something so helpful because the bad stuff is bn marketed wrong.

From: Wanda Richard <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 9:49 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance # 2026-1
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Greetings,
My name is Wanda Richard. I will be at today's meeting to share my experiences with Kartom. For many years ive been on pain medication it injections. I found Kartom Red to be a God sent. The plant is a natural pain relief. I am 69 years old and at this age i have choose a natural way of dealing with all my pain with no side effects like my pharmaceuticals have created. People have said people have died taking Kartom. Perhaps those may have had another substance that cause their death. Like anything people can do the same with their medications. I believe people have the right to choose what is best for them therefore I pray you will be opened minded and to gather more information concerning Kartom.

Thank you,
Wanda Richard
1 From: Venus Lynn <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 9:25 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Final Reading: A Kratom Ban Will Cause Real Harm CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
I am writing to you ahead of your final reading on the proposal to ban kratom in all its forms. I am asking you plainly and urgently not to do this.

I have lived for decades with serious chronic illnesses and disabling pain. I have been misdiagnosed, overmedicated, subjected to unnecessary procedures, and dismissed by the medical system more times than I can count. For nearly ten years now, plain leaf kratom tea has been the only thing that allows me to function, manage pain, and live with some dignity. Not get high. Not escape reality. Simply live.

When you listen to people calling for bans, please understand who they are and who they are not.The loudest voices pushing prohibition are often doctors, pharmaceutical companies, pharmacists, specialists, law enforcement, and institutions that profit from keeping people like me in their systems.

They lose money when patients manage their pain safely on their own. Police departments gain arrests.

Medical providers gain repeat patients. Pharmaceutical companies protect their market share. None of them live in my body or experience my pain, yet they are given the microphone while patients are ignored.

A total ban does not make people safer. It removes a safer option and forces people into far more dangerous ones.When kratom is taken away, people are pushed back toward high-risk pharmaceuticals, illegal markets, or desperation.

And this is where the conversation becomes unavoidable.

When you remove a person's ability to manage unbearable pain or declining health,you are not protecting life.You are narrowing their options. For many people with chronic illness or disability, banning kratom does not just increase suffering. It pushes them into researching end-of-life options sooner than they ever would have otherwise.

If your state and region recognize the right to die as a matter of autonomy and dignity, then you must also recognize the right to live with manageable suffering. Kratom allows people to keep going.Taking it away accelerates hopelessness. That is a consequence you cannot legislate away.

Please do not pass a ban that ignores real people, real medical harm, and real outcomes. Regulation focused on quality, labeling, and consumer safety is reasonable. Prohibition is not. It will hurt the very people who are already struggling the most.
1 I urge you to vote no on this ban.

Sincerely,
Venus Usher

Chronic pain patient and disability advocate
My Story: https:://share.google/FmmBi7LTUucD1 NZQD
2 From: renaay <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 9:03 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Re: Ordinance # 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern/,
Good morning,
My name is Rena Heagle, and I am respectfully requesting that there be a reconsideration on the banning of Kratom in your jurisdiction.

Kratom has helped my 86 years old Mother, and 78 year old friend in a very powerful and meaningful way.

Kratom is very different than the synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine. Please do not lump these together.

Our request is that you would regulate natural Kratom and distinguish it from 7-OH My Mother has used Kratom for 6 years now, and it is considered to be the most safe alternative to opiods/pharmaceuticals for her pain, as she suffers from osteoporosis, and spinal fractures. The loss of this wonderful plant would be devastating in their lives.

Thank you for your time, and your consideration in this matter.

Best regards,
Rena Heagle
1 From: Adam Figurski <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:53 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Please Regulate Real Kratom
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello cancel members I am writing to you in regards to the Kratom ban. From my understanding there is a meeting this evening to ban Kratom in the city of Marietta.

I would ask that you please reconsider this as Kratom has helped many people, including myself get off of opiates. I was prescribed opiates due to bulging discs and became addicted to them as millions of other people have and became trapped in a cycle of addiction with the only way out of turning to government assisted program such as Suboxone and methadone, which are just as dangerous or more dangerous and addicting than the opiate themselves.

I have recently heard of a chemical named 7-OH being labeled as Kratom. Please understand that this is not Kratom and 7-OH should absolutely be banned as it is extremely addictive and dangerous, people should not have such easy access to a substance such as this. Kratom itself is a natural leaf from a tree and my opinion is that Kratom should be regulated but not banned.

Again I just asked you to please reconsider a complete ban on Kratom but please do push for the regulation of Kratom.

And a complete ban of 7-OH. I believe the regulation of Kratom will help keep people safe and stop other chemicals such as 7-OH coming to the market and potentially endangering more people.

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or concerns.

Thank you,
Adam Figurski
Sent from my iPhone
1 From: Drea Powers
Dear Temecula City Council Members,
Hello, my name is Drea. I am writing respectfully to urge you to not support a ban on plain leaf kratom. I have been consuming kratom for over a decade for multiple chronic ailments. Many produce moderate to severe levels of pain. I am allergic to NSAIDs; my choices are limited. Kratom has worked for me more than any prescribed medications.

Also, it's important to add why I say plain leaf kratom (natural kratom). It is entirely different from 7OH and extracts.
7-hydroxymitragynine (70H) is a potent opioid agonist found only in trace amounts in natural kratom leaf.

When isolated or concentrated (as in some extracts or synthetics), it acts much more like a traditional opioid—carrying higher risks of respiratory depression, dependence, overdose, and drug interactions.

This is where most serious safety concerns arise.

Plain-leaf kratom, by contrast, is a whole-plant material dominated by mitragynine, which has partial and atypical opioid activity along with stimulant and adrenergic effects. In its natural form, kratom contains very low levels of 70H, and the alkaloids work together in a way that limits opioid-like risks when used responsibly. Epidemiological data consistently show far lower rates of overdose and respiratory suppression with plain leaf compared to isolated or enhanced products.

Bottom line:
70H concentration is the danger.

Plain-leaf kratom isolated or enhanced 70H.

Conflating the two leads to bad policy, bad science, and unnecessary harm.

Plain leaf kratom has had a positive and meaningful impact on my life (and the lives of so many others).

For me, it is a natural alternative that supports my well-being, ability to manage chronic pain. It also

provides energy and mental clarity-this is important as my chronic conditions cause chronic fatigue. I've had great success without the harmful side effects associated with many medications I've been prescribed.

Rather than banning plain leaf kratom, I support banning of 70H (7-hydroxymitragynine). I believe sensible regulation and quality control, as many plain leaf vendors have been following, is the best path forward.

I respectfully ask that you consider the many stories like mine and the growing body of research supporting plain leaf kratom's safety when used responsibly. Please do not ban plain leaf kratom- instead,work toward a balanced, science-based approach that keeps it available to those who rely on it.

Thank you for your time and for listening to the voices of responsible plain leaf Kratom consumers.

Regards,
Drea
2 ,
From: Sherri Helm <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:51 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance#2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Citycouncil
I wanted to say how natural Kratom has helped my family member tremendously.Before kratom he was in constant pain .So hard to watch him cry and nothing helped Doctors prescribed narcos that did really work and was hard to go to work on them.He takes a few kratom a day(natural not the kratom mixed with chemicals in it.lt has changed his life .Please consider the differences anbetween seven Hydroxy and don't ban natural kratom .Thank you for reading this.

Sherri
1 From: Drea Powers <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:48 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance # 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula City Council Members,
Hello, my name is Drea. I am writing respectfully to urge you to not support a ban on plain leaf kratom. I have been consuming kratom for over a decade for multiple chronic ailments. Many produce moderate to severe levels of pain. I am allergic to NSAIDs; my choices are limited. Kratom has worked for me more than any prescribed medications.

Also, it's important to add why I say plain leaf kratom (natural kratom). It is entirely different from 70H and extracts.
7-hydroxymitragynine (70H) is a potent opioid agonist found only in trace amounts in natural kratom leaf.

When isolated or concentrated (as in some extracts or synthetics), it acts much more like a traditional opioid—carrying higher risks of respiratory depression, dependence, overdose, and drug interactions.

This is where most serious safety concerns arise.

Plain-leaf kratom, by contrast, is a whole-plant material dominated by mitragynine,which has partial and atypical opioid activity along with stimulant and adrenergic effects. In its natural form, kratom contains very low levels of 70H, and the alkaloids work together in a way that limits opioid-like risks when used responsibly. Epidemiological data consistently show far lower rates of overdose and respiratory suppression with plain leaf compared to isolated or enhanced products.

Bottom line:
70H concentration is the danger.

Plain-leaf kratom # isolated or enhanced 70H.

Conflating the two leads to bad policy, bad science, and unnecessary harm.

Plain leaf kratom has had a positive and meaningful impact on my life (and the lives of so many others).

For me, it is a natural alternative that supports my well-being, ability to manage chronic pain. It also provides energy and mental clarity- this is important as my chronic conditions cause chronic fatigue. I've had great success without the harmful side effects associated with many medications I've been prescribed.

Rather than banning plain leaf kratom, I support banning of 70H (7-hydroxymitragynine). I believe sensible regulation and quality control, as many plain leaf vendors have been following, is the best path forward.
1 I respectfully ask that you consider the many stories like mine and the growing body of research supporting plain leaf kratom's safety when used responsibly. Please do not ban plain leaf kratom- instead, work toward a balanced, science-based approach that keeps it available to those who rely on it.

Thank you for your time and for listening to the voices of responsible plain plead Kratom consumers.

Regards,
Drea
2 From: Michael Pierson <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:46 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Natural Kratom
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Sent from my iPhone hello I am a Riverside county citizen. I have been taking powdered kratom for a couple years for the bulging disc pain in my neck! It helped me get off pain medication.The kratom powder has no withdraw symptoms and works wonderful. I know the liquid has some issues ! I think rather than banning it it needs some regulations on the liquid, which is not good for you! Thank you
1 From: Pamela Newcomer <
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:23 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: RE: Ordinance # 2026-01" in the subject line CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern,
I have been in the Kratom industry for two years now, I have seen numerous times where Kratom Tea powder has helped numerous friends, loved ones and customers. Recently, I've noticed we have helped numerous people get off 70H with the natural tea we offer. At our facility we offer no 70H. Why we would ban a natural substance like the tea powder that is helping people with pain management and drug dependency is beyond my mental capabilities. This is a natural substance that helps those who think they have no help. Why would you ban this? Pamela Newcomer
1 From: Martha Hernandez <
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 2:54 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Kratom Ban
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear council,
As someone who works at a small business that sells Kratom and who has dealt with substance issues in the past, I think I offer an insightful stance on this subject. As a business, we follow all regulations. The demographic of customers for Kratom is more older people than younger ones. I have customers who are professionals, business owners, who are blue collar workers and then spend all evening and weekends training their kids in youth sports. Many people use Kratom to manage severe physical ailments and maintain a sense of normalcy in their lives.

It is crucial that we promote informed decision-making and personal freedoms within our community.

Instead of prohibiting Kratom, I urge the council to consider implementing regulations focusing on education, responsible usage, and safety measures regarding its sale. By adopting a more nuanced approach, we can protect consumers while allowing them access to a beneficial option.

Thank you for considering my perspective on this important issue. I hope that you will reflect on the profound impact that banning Kratom could have on our community, and I encourage you to advocate for a balanced, thoughtful approach that respects individual choice and well-being.

From: Martha Hernandez <
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 2:26 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Kratom
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern,
It is very alarming and unfortunate that this council is trying to outright ban Kratom. Kratom is a natural and safe alternative for many instead of taking opiates.

It is vital to acknowledge that Kratom is not just used for recreational purposes; it has become an essential component of many individuals'wellness regimens. By taking Kratom, people have reported substantial improvements in their daily functioning and overall well-being. Banning this herbal remedy would not only restrict personal choice but could also lead to a greater risk for abuse of opiates as individuals search for alternatives to cope with their health issues, and therefore overdose risk will also increase. I think you'd be surprised by the demographics of people who take Kratom, normal, hard working people. I work at a shop and I'd say the average age for our Kratom customers is around 40-50 years of age. Please reconsider this decision, and consider the detrimental consequences an outright ban would have.
1 From: Denise Geltman <
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 12:46 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance #2026-01 - PLEASE DO NOT BAN NATURAL LEAF KRATOM
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Councilmembers:

I have been taking natural leaf Kratom for 10 years. It is my most valuable tool in my chronic pain toolbox.

I am 61 years old and it helps me so much with my fibromyalgia, IBS and migraines, I have been able to hold a part time job because of the relief it gives me from my chronic nerve pain and spasms.

PLEASE DO NOT BAN NATURAL LEAF KRATOM. It helps so many people However, I FULLY support a ban on all 7-OH products.They are very dangerous.

Thank you for your kind consideration of my requests.

Sincerely,
Denise Geltman

i

From: Nicole Damron <
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2026 9:23 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Kratom story!!
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello I'm writing you today to tell you a little bit about my story and my journey with kratom. I've had several surgeries and the last one was my back surgery that ended up causing me more pain than before I had it done. I was put on pain medication and then after so long I ended up on suboxone for several years and that ended up doing g more damage than help. I found kratom about 4 years ago and have been taking it twice a day and have completely came off of every prescription pain med and have never felt better!! I can function without too much pain and am soo much happier. I am asking you not to ban natural leaf kratom, I understand the synthetic 7oh is bad and needs to be banned but it's not the same as whole leaf kratom and people are getting it confused because of the way they marketed it. Please give us whole leaf kratom advocates a chance and really take the time to hear us and research the differences. Thank you for your time ..
1 From: Jordan Richard <
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2026 9:03 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance # 2026-01"
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Members of the Temecula City Council,
My name is Jordan Richard. I am the author of The Truth About Kratom: Life-Saving Plant or Botanical Menace?, and I am writing to respectfully urge the City of Temecula to reject a ban on natural kratom while fully supporting a ban on synthetic and altered products, including 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), through a clear, science-based regulatory approach.

Kratom is a natural botanical that has been used for centuries in Southeast Asia and is currently used by millions of Americans. The available scientific evidence does not support treating natural kratom as a public safety threat.

Research conducted by Johns Hopkins University has been especially clear. Johns Hopkins researchers have concluded that kratom is approximately 1,000 times safer than prescription opioids and many thousands of times safer than fentanyl. Their published data shows low abuse potential, a dramatically lower risk compared to opioids, and widespread use among individuals seeking to reduce or eliminate opioid use altogether.

The average kratom consumer in Temecula is a college educated woman, who's over 40, and has Chronic Pain.

It is also critical to accurately represent what the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has actually stated. In 2024, the FDA released its first human observational study on kratom and concluded that kratom appears to be safe, even at very high dose levels. FDA leadership has repeatedly clarified that their primary concern is not traditional kratom leaf, but rather highly concentrated, altered, or synthetic products, particularly 7- hydroxymitragynine (7-OH). Conflating natural kratom with these products misrepresents the science and leads to flawed policy decisions. 1 You have likely also seen the recent letter from the California Department of Public Health regarding kratom. That letter did not declare the kratom plant itself illegal. Rather, it clarified that kratom does not currently fit neatly into existing categories such as a dietary supplement, food additive, or drug, and therefore needs to be sold within its own clearly defined regulatory category. The plant itself was not deemed illegal. This distinction reinforces the need for regulation rather than prohibition.

In fact, California lawmakers are actively pursuing this solution through Senate Bill 1088, which focuses on regulating natural kratom while banning synthetic and altered products like 7-OH. This is exactly the approach the City of Temecula should adopt.

This distinction has already been recognized locally. Riverside County, Orange County, La Quinta, Anaheim, and Huntington Beach have all chosen to regulate natural kratom while banning or restricting synthetic 7-OH products.

This regulatory model is not difficult to enforce. The standard is straightforward: kratom should only be legal in its natural, unaltered leaf form. Any product that is not natural kratom should be banned. Any product containing elevated levels of 7- hydroxymitragynine beyond what is naturally present in kratom powder should be prohibited. Leave kratom in its natural form and ban everything else.

I would also like to humanize this issue. My mother is a 70-year-old retired drug and alcohol counselor who uses natural kratom to manage chronic pain related to serious health issues. My father is also 70 years old, works a corporate job, and uses kratom to manage anxiety. They are conservative Christians, active members of their community, and responsible adults. Policies that ban natural kratom would directly harm people like them.

An outright ban on natural kratom in Temecula would not eliminate demand. It would push residents toward unregulated markets or back to far more dangerous substances, including opioids, undermining public health rather than protecting it.

I respectfully urge the City of Temecula to reject prohibition of the natural kratom leaf, fully ban synthetic 7-OH products, and adopt a clear, enforceable regulatory framework grounded in science, clarity, and compassion.
2 Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
3 From: james shepherd <
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 1:54 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: RE: Ordinance # 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom it may concern, 01/23/2026
As a chronic pain patient I have deep gratitude for the availability of Kratom as a supplement to alleviate pain without negative side effects. At seventy-two years old now I have had back and hand surgeries, utilize an implanted spinal stimulator and am prescribed an opioid medication. Kratom leaf powder has allowed me to minimize use of the opioid. Kratom improves function without a narcotizing effect. I and my wife who also suffers from injury induced chronic pain have maintained the same 4-5 gram dose rate for over 9 years.

There are many people in chronic pain not helped by the medical industry that have turned to Nature which has provided a safe and effective remedy.

RESTRAINING KRATOM AVAILABILITY WILL FORCE PEOPLE TOWARD LESS SAFE ALTERNATIVES.

James Shepherd
Fresno, CA
1 From: David Woolf <
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 12:04 PM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Kratom Testimony, Melody Woolf
Attachments: Kratom Case Report.odt
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My wife Melody was the long time Kratom consumer chosen to testify of her 12 years of positive results taking plain leaf Kratom at the FDA/HHS briefing on Kratom.

Please see attached.

Regards,
David Woolf
1 Kratom Case Report: Long-Term Kratom Use in Chronic Pain and Functional Recovery Patient: Female, 60 years old
(written by yours truly, however, I do confer with the scientists on a regulat basis) History: Chronic pain for over 20 years due to fibromyalgia, arthritis, sciatica, and other conditions. Prior treatments included care from top specialists at the Cleveland Clinic and the head of the University of Michigan's Rheumatology Department. No sustained relief without significant side effects.

Baseline Function (Pre-Kratom):

Frequently bedridden
Required wheelchair or other mobility aids
Missed significant family milestones
Emotional connection with children diminished due to functional limitations Children assumed adult responsibilities prematurely
Severe pain at night; children used fans to mask the sound of mother's crying Intervention:

Introduction of plain leaf kratom 11 years ago for chronic pain management. Self-administered as part of a personal wellness regimen.

Outcomes:

Discontinued use of walker and wheelchair
Able to engage in physically demanding and recreational activities(camping, zoo visits, community participation)
Increased presence and participation in family life
Restored emotional closeness with spouse and children
Notable Functional Milestone:

In 2022, patient served as full-time caregiver for newborn granddaughter for 9 months following unexpected childcare closure. Activities included daily caregiving and ambulation with stroller, including walking through same zoo where patient was previously pushed in a wheelchair by her children.

Patient Perspective:
"Kratom gave me back the roles that matter most — being a mom,grandmother,wife, and someone who can show up for her community. These are parts of my life I thought were gone forever. My only regret is not finding it sooner."
Conclusion:

This case demonstrates the potential for kratom to restore function, reduce pain, and improve quality of life in long-term chronic pain patients.The patient's experience highlights both the physical and emotional dimensions of recovery, and the impact on family relationships.

From: Justin Wolf <
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 11:39 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Public Comment - Agenda Item 5 - ORDINANCE NO. 2026-01 CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
My name is Justin Wolf, and I'm the Founder&CEO of New Brew, a California-based 21+ alcohol-free beverage company. Our products contain small, clearly disclosed servings of natural kratom leaf and kava root --two botanicals that have helped countless adults, including myself, move away from alcohol.

First, I want to acknowledge that I understand your intent. You are trying to protect the health and safety of Temecula residents, especially young people. I genuinely respect that goal.

However, I am writing to strongly urge you to reject the proposed ordinance if it includes a full ban on kratom, and especially any language that bans possession.That type of approach is not common-sense public health policy-- it is prohibition, and it will cause real harm. 1) A possession ban is extreme and will punish normal, responsible adults A ban that includes possession does not target bad actors. It targets ordinary people:
•adults who use kratom responsibly
•working people trying to stay off alcohol
• people seeking natural alternatives for focus, mood, or stress •small businesses operating transparently and legally
It turns law-abiding residents into criminals overnight for possessing a natural leaf product that is already legal federally and widely regulated in other jurisdictions. 2) Kratom leaf is being conflated with 7-OH isolates -- and this is the core error There are unsafe products on the market today. The most concerning trend is the explosion of 7- hydroxymitragynine(7-OH) isolate products -- often synthetic, high-potency products sold under the loose umbrella of"kratom."
But 7-OH is not kratom. It is not simply a stronger version. It is a different category of product entirely, with a drastically different risk profile and misuse potential. i

A blanket ban on kratom leaf will not stop 7-OH. It will do the opposite: it will push everything underground, remove responsible sellers, and make enforcement more difficult. 3) Regulation works better than bans -- and California already has a framework underway
We don't claim kratom is risk-free -- no effects-forward product is. But the responsible path forward is standards and oversight, not prohibition.

California is already pursuing the right solution through AB 1088,which creates a structure to:
•restrict sales to adults
• require labeling and warnings
• require third-party testing and contaminant screening • limit potency and enforce standards
•ban dangerous synthetic/spiked products, including 7-OH isolates Many cities and counties in California have taken a similar approach after reviewing the facts: regulate kratom responsibly and ban 7-OH isolate products.

Temecula can do the same -- and should.
4)A ban will not reduce demand -- it will increase risk Bans do not eliminate demand. They push it into unregulated markets where products are:
•untested
• mislabeled or spiked
•sold without age restrictions
• more likely to be contaminated or dangerously potent
If the City's goal is public safety, a prohibition model(especially including possession) is the wrong tool.

It will create a black market and unnecessary criminalization, while failing to address the true source of harm.

My request to the City Council
I respectfully urge the City of Temecula to:

1. reject any ordinance that bans possession of kratom

2. avoid a blanket ban on natural kratom leaf

3. instead adopt common-sense regulation that:
o restricts sales to 21+
o requires testing and clear labeling
o enforces potency limits
o bans 7-OH isolate and synthetic/spiked products
o penalizes irresponsible retailers and bad actors
2 This is the most effective way to protect residents while respecting adult choice and avoiding unnecessary criminalization.

Thank you for taking the time to review this issue carefully. I would be happy to speak with City staff or Council members directly and provide additional information, including product labels, COAs, and consumer perspectives.

Respectfully,
Justin
Justin Wolf
Co-Founder&CEO, New Brew
drinknewbrew.com
Confidentiality Notice:The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be privileged.It is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s)and may be shared within their organization only with individuals who have a legitimate need to know.This message is not intended for further distribution or redissemination.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any use,disclosure,copying,distribution,or taking any action based on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you believe you have received this email in error,please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.To the extent this communication pertains to the potential provision of goods or services,it is subject to and includes New Brew's terms and conditions,which will be stated in writing should a transaction be initiated.
3 From: dijonevans <
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 11:03 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Kratom ban
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Dijon Evans and I am a California resident who is very concerned about this potential ban on kratom products.

Kratom has literally saved my life and given me the hope that I had lost due to the opioid epidemic and my medical history, losing the pain meds, because of the new opioid laws and the inhumane new rules that
no longer permitted patients such as myself and millions of others who were also cut off from the opioid medications due to the illegal selling of opioids by the illegitimate sales of the medications, the illegal prescriptions that were given to those who absolutely didn't need them, but they were obtaining them in order to sell them to those who were trying to make a lot of money by selling them to those who were either addicted to illicit drugs or those who were now desperate because they had been cut off of the medications that they had Legitimate reasons for taking them and had been given Legitimate prescriptions for years, sometimes decades by doctors for Legitimate reasons. I was injured when I had just turned 16. I had a short leg cast put on too tight and it killed the nerves and cut off the circulation.

The cast was only on for 4 days, but that was over 3 days too long. After that first week we were told that I was going to end up losing my leg, but I said that that wasn't going to happen! I was wrong!
The top specialists had tried to save my leg for 10 years. Doing experimental surgeries and procedures, doing procedures that at the time were considered to be the correct procedures, surgeries and the proper treatments, but now we know that those only made the situation worse and made the nerve damage spread throughout my body, and the 10 years that my leg remained on, only helped to spread the infections, pulmonary embolisms, sepsis, gangrene, deep vein thrombosis,and allowed the osteomyelitis to find a place to hide in my system. It doesn't take much of an injury, a simple bruising to a bone, or just a bruise to anywhere and it leads to another bout of osteomyelitis ( bone infection).

I have been legally dead several times and on my deathbed several other times.

I have full body CRPS with organ involvement, optical, occipital and trigeminal Neuralgia, multiple organ failure, and I have had more than 240 surgeries and procedures.

I wasn't supposed to live to be 30, but here I am after a very difficult 30 years beyond that age, several near death escapes, and I just turned 62. I have had amputations, pulmonary embolisms, sepsis, gangrene, 17 bouts of osteomyelitis and now also have osteonecrosis of my jaw, sinuses and facial bones, including the left inner ear, and soon to be the right. It is now affecting the entire inside of my skull,the soft inner bones. There is nothing that can be done for me because I am too high risk for the needed surgeries to repair my skull and inner ears. They can't do surgery because of the extremely high risk that I will develop osteomyelitis of my skull and the chance that it will lead to the infection of my

brain. If by chance that I don't develop osteomyelitis, there's an even higher risk that the surgical bone placement would fail because of the necrosis.

The only places that could put me into a medically induced coma and provide prophylaxis antibiotic treatment, and then do the surgery while still keeping me in a comatose state, are far enough away that I would have to be flown there. This cannot be done because I don't have any bone in-between my brain and inner ear that we need to provide the protection to our brain when we experience the pressure changes while in flight. So, now with everything else that I have encountered and fought to live through, I am nearing the end of the road. Not just because of my medical conditions, but because of my age. For over 15 years I was bedridden and unable to care for myself. Everything had to be done for me, and it included in home nursing care for the PICC lines..

My daughter has lived with this her entire life. My grandkids have as well! James, my partner has been subjected to this the entire time that he has known me and he's been an amazing, loving and caring man who has taken very good care of me! He's been subjected to so very much! So many times he has been told that he needed to say his goodbye to me because I wouldn't make it through the night. But each and every time that I pulled through the night- I would wake up to him holding my hand, watching me and crying tears of joy as I would open my eyes. Each time he would explain to me why I was in CCU, and he would begin to tell me what happened.

Each time he would just look at me and tell me how much he loved me.

When opioids were removed from the picture, even though I was diagnosed as a terminal patient, but because I wasn't a terminal cancer patient- so I wouldn't be able to get through the worst known painful conditions that are known to us, this is what I experience. Every single second of every single day. Every single second of every minute. Every minute of every hour. Every hour of each day of every month.. Every month of each year.. Decade after Decade for the past 46 years.

It feels like I am being electrocuted from the inside out and that my tissues are being seared together.

That's on a good day! Unfortunately I had reached the point where I felt that I was not able to take it anymore and I was ready to take my own life. This has been very difficult to admit because I have a beautiful daughter, and 3 beautiful grandchildren, and an amazing man that I love and he loves me! I have so very much to live for! But each time something else happened, I could see what my health was doing to them and every other person that I love , have loved; I was able to see what it was doing to them, in their eyes. Each time I felt like I was being electrocuted, I felt as if it was going through my body and directly into them. It wasn't only killing me, but it was chasing everyone that I loved- right out of my life.

After the first amputation, I spent most of my younger years in college and then medical school. I thrived in college! I was so happy and I felt better than I had in years! But when I was in college, I was in a extremely abusive marriage and I was seriously injured,which made the damage spread through my upper arms and body. I ended up taking a medical leave of absence, but I was very good at research,so when the word kratom was introduced to me, I researched everything that I could find out about kratom! After several months of researching it, talking to my medical team, my mentors, and my family- I decided that if I was going to look at ending my own life, that kratom would definitely be worth a shot.

I ordered some pure, unadulterated kratom leaf powder from a reputable vendor and waited. Because of a holiday, and a long weekend- it took longer than expected to arrive.

I had already thought that kratom was just a scam anyway... another" get rich scam.. a way for unscrupulous people to take advantage of very desperate people who were in serious pain,looking for a way to find anything to help.. even just a little bit: I held no HOPE that it would help.

I was, after all from the science background and I held no belief in dietary supplements.

I have spent the past 9 years eating crow for that lack of belief because as I said,I didn't believe in it AT ALL!!
2 BUT AS I SAID, KRATOM QUITE LITERALLY SAVED MY LIFE! I was leaving the house to follow through with my plans to take my own life when the mailman showed up with my first package. I WAS LESS THAN A HALF HOUR AWAY FROM TAKING MY OWN LIFE!!
SUCH A DIFFICULT THING TO SAY!!
I HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO LOSE, BUT EVERYTHING TO GAIN by going back in the house and trying kratom. I did.

I AM SO INCREDIBLY GRATEFUL THAT I DID!!
Approximately 20 minutes later my pain was at a tolerable level. Instead of being in bed, crying and begging for the torture to end, James came home and found me sitting on the couch smiling.

He knelt beside me and cried.

He knew that the kratom had arrived and that it was helping! Kratom doesn't get rid of all of my pain, but it allows me to be at tolerable levels.

I was never supposed to live to be 30 years old, and I have fought very hard to live. For the past 9 years I have been able to experience the miracles of life that most people take for granted.

In approximately 15 days, I will be able to see what I was never going to be able to see-the miracle of the birth of my Great Granddaughter. This is what kratom has given me. Please don't ban kratom products. Regulations are what we need, not prohibition!! Thank you very much!
Dijon Evans
Sent from my Galaxy
3 From: Jennifer Gillis <
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 11:13 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: Ordinance No 2026-01
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Council Members of Temeculaca,
I urge members of the city council to consider sensible regulation instead of prohibition.

I'd like to share the impact that kratom has had in my life:

After waking up one day in 2005, paralyzed from my neck down, I was eventually diagnosed with Transverse Myelitis, and became a chronic pain patient. For years, I was able to manage my chronic pain with prescription medications, but eventually with more DEA cutbacks and new regulations over the years those were no longer an option for me. I was left to endure living in pain every single second of every single day just like so many other chronic pain patients in the same position. Luckily I discovered whole leaf kratom powder in May of 2019. I've been consuming it responsibly for 6 years and it has granted me a second chance at life! I no longer suffer every day, I can get out of bed and be a mom! I can go to school functions run errands, go to the store, and just live life without suffering. Though I regained mobility I still face many physical limitations, however I'm no longer confined by constant pain. Kratom gave me my life back. My story is just one of many chronic pain patients that have been able to manage their pain with kratom.

There is a big difference between natural whole-leaf kratom VS the semi-synthetic 7-OH products being marketed as kratom. I've been encouraged to see even the FDA has stepped in, not only to educate the public on this distinction, but also to warn about the risks of 7-OH.They've made it clear their concern is with 7-OH products, NOT with whole leaf kratom.

I'm asking you to support regulation instead of prohibition and keep natural,whole-leaf kratom legal.We need clear safety standards such as age restrictions, mandatory lab testing, accurate labeling, and limits on 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH). These are the kinds of measures that protect public health while preserving the freedom of choice for responsible adults.

Thank you so much for your time and letting me use my voice to represent the many others in the chronic pain community.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Gillis
Kratom Advocate
Living With Chronic Pain—Speaking Up for Those Who Can't

From: Misty Brown <
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 10:54 AM
To: Council Comments
Subject: RE: Ordinance 2026-01
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Members of the City Council,
I am writing to clarify an important scientific distinction between traditional whole-leaf kratom and the products now being sold as "7-hydroxymitragynine" (7-OH).

Whole-leaf kratom is the dried leaf of Mitragyna speciosa. Its primary alkaloid, mitragynine, is what produces kratom's effects.When consumed, the human body converts only a very small fraction of mitragynine into 7-OH, typically well under 1%, through normal liver metabolism. This process is slow and self-limiting.

By contrast, today's 7-OH products are not naturally occurring kratom preparations. They contain laboratory-isolated or chemically converted 7-hydroxymitragynine in concentrations far beyond what the body could ever produce from kratom leaf.At these levels, 7-OH behaves much more like a traditional opioid, with significantly higher risk.

Conflating these high-potency 7-OH products with the kratom plant itself leads to inaccurate risk assessments and poor public health policy. Regulating or restricting 7-OH does not require banning whole-leaf kratom,which has helped many adults avoid far more dangerous substances.

I urge the City Council to consider this distinction when evaluating policy and enforcement decisions.

Here's my testimony...

From 2008 to 2019, I lived in the grip of FDA-approved pain pills, benzos, and muscle relaxers prescribed for my degenerative disc disease. For 11 years, chronic pain management fueled my addiction.What started as a dependency slowly slid into a destructive cycle of misuse and despair.

In April 2019, I was dismissed from pain management after failing a required pill count. I was 11 pills short, and my usual drug dealers didn't have the pink oxy 10s I needed. Cut off from prescriptions, I turned to the streets in desperation and eventually slipped into cocaine use while searching for another doctor.

Then, in June 2019, while suffering through cocaine withdrawal, I stumbled upon the documentary A Leaf of Faith.That single moment changed the course of my life. The very next day, I began my journey with whole-leaf Kratom, not synthetic 70H, by walking into a smoke shop. The Kratom was in a glass case, 1 locked up and i was carded when purchased.

Kratom quieted the relentless cravings, the constant voice whispering, one more pill, one more snort, one more escape. For the first time in over a decade, I felt peace. Kratom gave me the space and clarity to confront the deeper reasons behind my addiction and to rebuild my life from the ground up.

I have not returned to pain management in over six and a half years.Today, I am a thriving mother, a proud first-time grandmother, a functioning member of society, and a tax-paying citizen. Most importantly, I'm no longer a burden to my children. I'm an example of hope and healing.

I will forever be grateful that I found safe, lab-tested,whole-leaf Kratom. Now, I share my story, knowledge, and the science behind it to help others facing addiction, chronic pain, anxiety, and depression.

Yours truly,
Misty Brown
Kratom Consumer, Advocate &Activist est. 2019
2

← All documents from this meeting