Agenda — Temecula City Council, May 26, 2026 (part 5 of 5)

Project
There is an old saying that said “give to Cesar what is Caesar’s So give to San Diego county what belongs in San Diego county “
When there is nothing to gain and a lot to
Loose use common sense plus has there been an environmental impact report ? The effect that it has medically on people living in close proximity .

Joe
Sent from my iPhone

From:Lizzette Contreras
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Public Statement Opposing the Proposed Powerline Project in Temecula Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 2:27:46 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Randi,
I am writing to submit a formal public statement FIRMLY opposing the proposed powerline project in Temecula. The concerns raised by Residents are significant and warrant full consideration BEFORE any further actions are taken.

The project poses serious wildfire risks, particularly given the propensity for fast-moving, wind-driven fires in California. Elevated transmission lines increase the potential for ignition; any failure during peak fire conditions could have devastating consequences for Temecula and the neighboring communities. This threat creates significant concerns regarding home insurance availability, air quality, and the potential loss of property. We should look to the lessons learned from the Altadena fire regarding the severe impact on residents and the difficulty of long-term recovery.

There are also substantial health concerns associated with prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF), particularly for families living near the proposed route. Many residents feel this project places an unfair burden on our well-being without providing a direct benefit to the City of Temecula. Furthermore, the noise pollution from high-voltage lines will negatively impact both residents and local wildlife.

The environmental disruptions to wildlife corridors and natural habitats must also be considered. Wildlife faces the same risks as residents, including habitat loss from potential wildfires, destruction of land during construction, and long-term health effects from EMF.

Additionally, the installation of large transmission structures will negatively impact property values and resident equity. The visual intrusion of industrial infrastructure will permanently alter Temecula's reputation. Temecula’s ability to compete with Napa Valley will be compromised as our rustic scenery shifts to an industrialized backdrop. This will result in a loss of tourism appeal that is tied to our wine country aesthetics.

I urge the City to explore all available avenues to halt or redirect this project. This includes demanding a full environmental impact review, requesting alternative routing away from residential zones, away from Temecula, and advocating for undergrounding options where feasible. Please also consider the potential long-term maintenance issues that may burden the city.

Thank you for ensuring that community voices are heard and represented.

Sincerely,
Lizzette Contreras

From:Martin de Vries
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SCGE Proposal for Large Electric Transmission Towers through Temecul Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 2:09:33 PM
Attachments:SDGE Temecula Town Council - May 25, 2026.docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please see attached.

To the Temecula City Council,

As a concerned resident, I respectfully urge the City of Temecula to adopt strong local protections regarding any proposed 500 kV transmission corridor involving approximately 200-foot industrial power line towers near our neighborhoods, schools, and protected open spaces.

While I understand that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) may retain permitting authority over large transmission projects, the City still possesses important authority and responsibility to protect public safety, neighborhood integrity, wildfire evacuation capability, scenic resources, and compatibility with existing residential communities.

I strongly request that the City adopt formal policies, ordinances, resolutions, and General Plan protections establishing minimum setbacks and incompatibility standards for any future high-voltage transmission infrastructure.

Specifically, I urge the City to pursue the following protections:
• Minimum 1,500-foot setbacks from existing residential neighborhoods, including Morgan Hill, Redhawk, Temecula Creek communities, and adjacent residential developments. • Minimum 2,000-foot setbacks from schools, youth facilities, parks, and athletic fields, including Vail Ranch Middle School.
• Minimum 2,500-foot setbacks from ecological preserves, riparian corridors, and scenic open-space resources, including the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve and Temecula Creek corridor. • Formal recognition that 200-foot industrial transmission towers are incompatible with established residential neighborhoods, scenic gateways, preserve areas, and wildfire-prone evacuation corridors. • Mandatory analysis of wildfire ignition risk, emergency evacuation impacts, aerial firefighting interference, and cumulative environmental impacts.
• Formal City advocacy for undergrounding alternatives wherever technically feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

The proposed scale of these towers would permanently alter the visual character, environmental integrity, and safety profile of our community. Temecula residents purchased homes and raised families here with the expectation that our neighborhoods, schools, preserves, and scenic corridors would be protected from industrial- scale infrastructure intrusion.

This issue extends far beyond aesthetics. It directly impacts:
- wildfire safety,
- evacuation reliability,
- property values,
- community planning,
- environmental preservation,
- and quality of life for thousands of residents.

I respectfully ask the City Council to use every available legal and procedural tool, including CEQA participation, zoning authority, General Plan consistency requirements, scenic corridor protections, and public safety findings, to oppose or significantly restrict placement of industrial-scale 500 kV transmission towers near Temecula residential communities and protected lands.

Thank you for your consideration and continued commitment to protecting the residents and character of Temecula.

Sincerely,

Martin T. Devries
Temecula Resident

From:Jon Muench
To:Randi Johl
Subject:My comment
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 2:07:16 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I don’t care how much they want to put those ugly things through, don’t touch wine country or go through Temecula!!!!
Make a better system designed to not look god awful.

When will the greedy company’s CEO’s think or care about the people they’re supposed to be helping? Sent from my iPhone

From:Lynne Lattanzi
To:Council Comments
Subject:Save Temecula Stop STD&E
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 1:35:41 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am writing because I am STRONGLY opposed to the proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink Project planned for Temecula. I am deeply concerned because this route reportedly passes through heavily populated, family-centered communities (including ours) instead of being routed further away from homes and recreational areas.

People are especially alarmed about impacts near:
- Temecula Creek
- Wine Country
- Vail Lake
- Galway Downs
- Residential Neighborhoods
- Trails & Parks
- Schools
- Sensitive Ecological & Scenic Land
We worry that these transmission towers could permanently and negatively impact:
- Property Values
- Scenic Views
- Wildlife Habitat
- Open Space
- Fire Safety Concerns
- Tourism and Wine Country
- The Overall Quality of Life
- Health and Safety
Residents are demanding:
- Rerouting Alternatives
- Greater Transparency
- Stronger Environmental Review
- More Public Involvement
And more accountability before decisions are made that could permanently change Temecula forever.

Please consider all of the above and help us stop this from happening.

Thank you.

Lynne Lattanzi
Resident of Temecula
Sent from my iPad

From:tzagamell tougidieqia
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Golden pacific power link
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 1:11:48 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Randy,
Here are my questions:
1) Is this project a done deal?
2) Are we being led to believe that we have a say in the matter when in fact we don’t? 3) Have alternative routes been considered that don’t cut through Temecula? 4) Homeowners insurance will
be nearly impossible find and if any at all remain available-it will be very costly.

This feels like a hostile gestapo takeover!!!
As a realtor for many years, from the San Fernando Valley in the 80’s to current day Temecula, I know first hand for a fact that people don’t want to purchase homes near any type of power lines let alone the ones that are being proposed. They don’t want to see them, hear them or suffer any health complications that can ensue as a result. It will be very hard to sell homes as a result and property values will tank! How on earth did this proposal get approved? Where are our rights? Our homes are our biggest investments and many will lose $$$ if this goes thru.

Did our city officials
see this coming or are they as blindsided as all of us? If approved, this will unfortunately create a mass exodus of homeowners leaving Temecula and sadly everyone will lose as home values will tank.

Thank you-
Paula Niquet
A concerned wife, mother, homeowner & realtor that resides too close to this project for comfort.

Sent from my iPhone

From:Amber Cleveland
To:Council Comments
Subject:SDGE powerline corridor
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 1:10:46 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Temecula City Council,

Specifically, I urge the City to pursue the following protections:

• Minimum 1,500-foot setbacks from existing residential neighborhoods, including Morgan Hill, Redhawk, Temecula Creek communities, and adjacent residential developments.

• Minimum 2,000-foot setbacks from schools, youth facilities, parks, and athletic fields, including Vail Ranch Middle School.

• Minimum 2,500-foot setbacks from ecological preserves, riparian corridors, and scenic open-space resources, including the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve and Temecula Creek corridor.

• Mandatory analysis of wildfire ignition risk, emergency evacuation impacts, aerial firefighting interference, and cumulative environmental impacts.

• Formal City advocacy for undergrounding alternatives wherever technically feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

This issue extends far beyond aesthetics. It directly impacts:

- wildfire safety,
- evacuation reliability,
- property values,
- community planning,
- environmental preservation,
- and quality of life for thousands of residents.

Thank you for your consideration and continued commitment to protecting the residents and character of Temecula.

Sincerely,

Amber Cleveland
Temecula Resident

From:WES BROSZCZAK
To:Council Comments
Subject:SDG&E Electric Towers
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 12:42:48 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am 100% AGAINST allowing SDG&E to run electric towers through Temecula Creek Wes Broszczak

Temecula

From:Amber Cleveland
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SDGE Powerline corridor
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 12:34:50 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Temecula City Council,

Specifically, I urge the City to pursue the following protections:

• Minimum 1,500-foot setbacks from existing residential neighborhoods, including Morgan Hill, Redhawk, Temecula Creek communities, and adjacent residential developments.

• Minimum 2,000-foot setbacks from schools, youth facilities, parks, and athletic fields, including Vail Ranch Middle School.

• Minimum 2,500-foot setbacks from ecological preserves, riparian corridors, and scenic open-space resources, including the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve and Temecula Creek corridor.

• Mandatory analysis of wildfire ignition risk, emergency evacuation impacts, aerial firefighting interference, and cumulative environmental impacts.

• Formal City advocacy for undergrounding alternatives wherever technically

feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

This issue extends far beyond aesthetics. It directly impacts:

- wildfire safety,
- evacuation reliability,
- property values,
- community planning,
- environmental preservation,
- and quality of life for thousands of residents.

Thank you for your consideration and continued commitment to protecting the residents and character of Temecula.

Sincerely,

Amber Cleveland
Temecula Resident

From:Lynn Martin
To:

Subject:OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK PROJECT IN TEMECULA Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 12:18:15 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From: Gary Ruderman
Subject: Fw: OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK

PROJECT IN TEMECULA

To Whom It May Concern,
Our home overlooks the exact location where one of
these towers would be placed directly below us. If this project moves forward, we would be forced to leave the
area to protect our health, safety, and quality of life.

This project places our entire community at risk
through increased fire danger, serious health concerns, destruction of wildlife habitat, and devastating loss of property values. It would permanently transform
Temecula from the beautiful community families chose
to live in into an industrialized landscape filled with massive utility towers and urban blight.

Thousands of nearby homes would be negatively
impacted. Children at Vail Ranch Middle School would
spend hours each day just yards away from these
dangerous structures. Families should not be forced to
live with these risks imposed on them for a project that

provides no benefit to our community.

We strongly oppose this project and urge the City to
protect our neighborhoods, our children, our wildlife,
and the character of Temecula before irreversible
damage is done.

We need environmental and real estate lawyers to help
stop this project and protect the people who live here.

This is corporate greed being placed above the health,
safety, and well-being of residents. There is no benefit to the families whose homes, views, property values,
and peace of mind will be destroyed.

And lastly, will SDG&E cover the billions of dollars in medical costs, fire damage or property value losses that residents suffer because of these dangerous, monstrous, and hideous towers?
Sincerely,
Gary Ruderman

From:Jennifer Macfadden
To:Randi Johl; Council Comments; [email protected]
Subject:Opposition to Golden Pacific Powerlink - Comments from a Temecula Resident to be added to the public record May 2026
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 11:58:36 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing as a concerned resident to express strong opposition to the proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink Project and any plan that would place high-voltage transmission infrastructure and approximately 200-foot industrial transmission towers within or near Temecula communities, schools, evacuation corridors, natural open-space areas, and environmentally sensitive lands.

While transmission planning and permitting may involve multiple agencies, including the California Public Utilities Commission, local and regional governing bodies also have an obligation to protect public safety, land-use compatibility, environmental resources, economic vitality, and the long-term character of the communities they serve.

The concerns surrounding this project extend far beyond aesthetics.

Southwest Riverside County already faces substantial wildfire risk, constrained evacuation routes, and growing pressure on natural resources and infrastructure. Introducing large-scale transmission corridors into high fire-risk areas raises serious questions regarding wildfire ignition potential, impacts on emergency response operations, evacuation reliability during catastrophic events, and long-term community resilience.

The proposed route also raises concerns related to seismic safety. Portions of Southwest Riverside County exist within a region influenced by active fault systems, including the San Jacinto Fault zone. Given California’s seismic realities, infrastructure of this scale warrants rigorous evaluation of potential risks associated with ground movement, structural stability, emergency response challenges, and long-term public safety considerations.

Temecula and its surrounding open-space areas are not vacant land waiting for industrial development. They are interconnected natural landscapes that support wildlife habitat, migration corridors, native vegetation, recreation, and the scenic environment that defines this region. Construction and long-term operation of industrial transmission infrastructure through these areas could fragment habitat, disturb ecosystems, alter natural landscapes, and diminish one of the community’s most valued assets.

There are also substantial economic concerns.

Temecula’s economy relies heavily on its scenic character, wine country identity, recreation opportunities, hospitality industry, weddings, tourism, and locally owned businesses. The region has intentionally preserved a rural and community-centered identity that attracts residents and visitors alike. Industrial transmission corridors of this scale could negatively affect property values, place additional financial burdens on homeowners, impact tourism-

related industries, reduce economic activity, and ultimately affect local tax revenues that support community services.

Many residents are also concerned that the community is being asked to absorb significant long-term burdens while receiving little direct local benefit. Projects of this scale should require careful examination of whether less disruptive alternatives exist, including alternative routes, undergrounding where feasible, distributed energy solutions, battery storage, microgrids, and other technologies designed to strengthen grid resilience while minimizing community impacts.

I respectfully urge all involved agencies to require comprehensive environmental review under CEQA, including meaningful analysis of route alternatives, public safety impacts, wildfire and seismic considerations, economic effects, and less harmful infrastructure options before irreversible decisions are made.

Temecula’s neighborhoods, natural landscapes, and community identity have been carefully built over generations. Decisions of this scale deserve the highest level of scrutiny and a planning process that prioritizes public safety, environmental stewardship, and the long-term well-being of the communities affected.

Thank you for your consideration and for your service to the residents and communities of Southwest Riverside County.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Macfadden
Temecula Resident

From:Susan Frommer
To:Randi Johl
Cc:frommer Susan
Subject:Power link
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 11:28:23 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Randi Johl
City Clerk
Temecula
Dear Temecula City Council
When I first heard of the proposal to string high voltage power lines through the City of Temecula along one of the few still free-flowing creeks/waterways in Southern California, I thought there must be a mistake in the reporting. Sadly, this was not the case.

I am not a resident of Temecula; however I do have some experience being involved in fighting a multi-year battle battle with a for-profit company that wanted to build a dam in a pristine canyon, pump water for already threatened Lake Elsinore up to this dam, then release the water through a generating station to produce electricity. This electricity had to go somewhere, so the proponents applied to string high voltage power lines along the eastern edge of the Cleveland National Forest which delineates the western boundary of the Santa Rosa Plateau communities. Not only would the project interfere with the viability of Lake Elsinore, reduce the value of properties along the lake shore and flood a pristine canyon, but it posed a massive threat of wildfire to the Plateau communities should any of the lines be compromised. In a similar fashion to the current Power Link proposal, the electricity generated would not benefit the local residents, rather communities to the south of the project.

Our concerns and fears were validated by the recent disasters of the Eaton and Palisades fires.

The project was ultimately defeated by consistent and persistent (over years) massive community opposition, involvement of various environmental organizations, push-back from County supervisors, strong opposition from the Elsinore City Council (despite applicants’ assertions of economic gain) and law suits.

This is not just Temecula’s fight. Should this project succeed, its negatives will impact surrounding communities through loss of threatened habitat, lower property values, loss of visitors, potential health issues for those living close, loss of threatened species whose numbers are already declining and probably more negatives I have not even thought of yet.

As a City Council, one of your major duties is to protect the members of your community. As a corollary, that duty should extend to all the citizens of surrounding areas, since your decisions on this issue can affect us all. Do not be misled by the promise of “jobs”. This is a tactic used frequently to justify unjust actions by those who stand to benefit. As with all projects of this magnitude, the profits will be PRIVATIZED and the damages SOCIALIZED.

You need allies. You need to partner with the desert communities to the east of us whose well-being is threatened by the massive data center(s) driving this Power Link, all entities involved in Anza Borrego State Park (also a victim in this fight), every local Resource Conservation District, Consult the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan for Riverside County, lawyer-up, get your County Supervisor involved, mobilize your residents and be prepared for a long fight.

As I said above, I am not a resident of Temecula. However, I and others will support you as best we can. If this can happen to Temecula, it can happen to any of us. We can be like NATO. An attack on one of us, is an attack on all.

Sincerely,
Susan Frommer
Murrieta

From:Fred Dimaggio
To:Council Comments
Cc:Alfred Dimaggio; Madelyn Dimaggio
Subject:SDG&E’s 500‑kV Transmission Line Through Temecula Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 11:06:53 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Staff,
My name is Alfred Dimaggio and I am a resident of Temecula.

I am submitting this statement to express my strong opposition to SDG&E’s proposed 500‑kilovolt Golden Pacific Powerlink transmission line through our city.

This project poses significant and unacceptable risks to Temecula’s residents, environment, economy, and long‑term planning goals.

I urge the City Council to continue opposing this project and to advocate aggressively on behalf of our community.

1. The project provides no direct benefit to Temecula residents Temecula is served by Southern California Edison, not SDG&E.

This 500‑kV line is designed to move bulk power across the state—not to improve reliability, affordability, or service for Temecula households.

Our community would bear the visual, environmental, and safety burdens of a project that does not serve us.

2. The proposed route cuts directly through sensitive and populated areas The draft alignment crosses:

SR‑79 / Temecula Parkway corridor
Temecula Creek and surrounding habitat
Vail Lake and rural residential areas
The Santa Margarita River watershed
Neighborhoods east of I‑15 and the De Luz foothills
These are not empty corridors. They are homes, schools, wildlife habitat, recreation areas,

and cultural sites.

A 500‑kV line with towers up to 190 feet tall would permanently alter the character and viewshed of our city.

3. Increased wildfire risk in an already high‑risk region Temecula sits in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Introducing a new 500‑kV overhead transmission corridor increases:
ignition risk
emergency response complexity
evacuation challenges
long‑term fire insurance costs for homeowners
One equipment failure or wind‑driven arc fault could have catastrophic consequences.

4. Environmental and cultural resource damage
The proposed corridor threatens:
riparian habitat along Temecula Creek
wildlife movement corridors
protected species
tribal cultural resources
scenic open space that defines our region
Once these areas are disturbed, they cannot be restored to their original condition.

5. Better alternatives exist
SDG&E has not demonstrated that:
undergrounding is infeasible
alternative corridors outside residential areas were fully evaluated non‑wires solutions (storage, grid upgrades, distributed generation) were considered impacts to Temecula were minimized in any meaningful way

Temecula should not be the path of least resistance.

Conclusion
For all these reasons:

Public safety, environmental protection, property values, community character, and lack of local benefit; I respectfully urge the Temecula City Council to:

Formally oppose the Golden Pacific Powerlink route through Temecula Submit strong comments to the CPUC and state agencies
Advocate for alternative routes or undergrounding outside residential areas Protect our community from unnecessary and avoidable harm Thank you for your time and for your continued commitment to safeguarding the residents and future of Temecula.

Alfred/Madelyn Dimaggio Temecula Residents

From:Jane Denny
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SDGE project
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 10:26:47 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern…
High voltage power lines are going to make our beautiful town ugly! Not only affecting the health of all of us and animals that live here! Then we don’t even get the benefit of using this energy being produced! Please put my vote as a NO to these huge power towers here in Temecula! Thank you,
Sincerely, Jane Denny

From:Jackie Peck
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Golden Pacific Powerlink
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 9:38:34 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My home backs up to Temecula creek. I enjoy the 146 different wildlife species that live in the creek every day.

The 200 ft -20 story towers will ruin our precious Temecula creek ecosystem. Our property values will plummet.

They will be an eyesore on our lovely city you all have so far made a beautiful place to live and visit. I oppose these towers going in any where in Temecula.

Thank you for paying attention to this matter
Sincerely
Jacqueline Peck
Sent from my iPhone

From:Gloria Farewell
Subject:OPPOSE: Golden Pacific Powerlink — Demand Rerouting, Full Environmental Review & Transparency Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 8:57:17 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council Members,
I am writing as a deeply concerned resident to formally oppose the proposed routing of the Golden Pacific Powerlink project through Temecula Valley.

The placement of 150–200 foot, 500-kV transmission towers through our residential neighborhoods, Wine Country, Temecula Creek, parks, trails, and areas adjacent to schools like Vail Ranch Middle School is simply unacceptable. This is not a matter of inconvenience — this is a permanent, irreversible alteration to the character, safety, and natural beauty of our community.

What makes this project particularly alarming is that the proposed route appears to cut directly through some of Temecula's most cherished and ecologically sensitive areas when alternative corridors may well exist. The threat to property values, scenic views, wildlife habitat, open space, fire safety, and our tourism economy — including our renowned Wine Country — cannot be overstated.

Equally troubling is the lack of transparency throughout this process. Many residents are only now learning this project exists, despite years of apparent planning. That is a failure of public process that must be addressed.

I am demanding the following before any decisions are finalized:
• Serious evaluation of rerouting alternatives that avoid residential and ecologically sensitive areas
• A full, rigorous environmental review
• Meaningful public participation — not notification after the fact • Complete transparency from all parties involved
Temecula's neighborhoods, natural lands, and community identity deserve protection. I urge you to stand with residents and reject any route that treats our homes, schools, and open spaces as expendable.

I will be watching the outcome of this process closely and expect accountability from every elected and appointed official involved.

Respectfully,
Gloria Farewell

Temecula, CA 92592
(

From:Jim Schloss
To:Council Assistant
Cc:Randi Johl; Zak Schwank; Brenden Kalfus; Jessica Alexander; James Stewart; Matt Rahn; Bonny Schloss Subject:Resident Feedback for May 26, Council Meeting
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 6:30:20 AM
Attachments:J_Schloss_Temecula_City_Council_5_26_26.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula City Council,
Shown below are the comments that I hope to make on the proposed Golden Pacific Power Link at the May 26 City Council meeting. I would like these comments added to the meeting record. I've also attached a duplicate pdf file copy of my comments.

Best Regards,
Jim Schloss
Temecula CA 92592
Good afternoon, Mayor Alexander and City Council members.

I’m Jim Schloss, a Temecula resident. I’ve spent 40 years as an electrical engineer, and I hold a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois.

I oppose the Golden Pacific Power Link because its reckless routing across Temecula creates extreme public safety risks and has significant environmental and economic impacts. In my opinion, it violates the California Environmental Quality Act in the following key areas:

· The Power Link creates an unmitigable industrial footprint as our new dominant landmark. This eight-mile wall of thirty, 190-foot towers will dwarf Pechanga Resort and permanently destroy the scenic beauty driving our tourism.

· The creek corridor is under 450 feet wide, meaning the Power Link easement will unavoidably infringe on three schools, 400 homes, Pechanga's golf course, and multiple city parks.

· With flanking homes and commercial buildings leaving no room on the banks, the towers must go directly into the creek bed. This placement guarantees the destruction of protected Temecula Creek wetlands and sensitive species.

· The route travels directly across the active Lake Elsinore fault, parallels the Wildomar branch, and cuts right through a designated liquefaction zone.

· The Power Link drops a permanent 'linear ignition source' into a high-wildfire-severity zone where Santa Ana winds and seismic risks multiply the danger.

· The route cuts Temecula in half at Temecula Creek. The Power Link can potentially block or bottleneck evacuation routes during a disaster.

· The danger posed by the massive electrical towers will effectively ground our sunrise hot air balloon industry, destroying a cornerstone of Temecula’s tourism economy and visual identity.

I estimate the Power Link will cause $1 billion in cumulative economic damage: half from a sharp decline in wine tourism, and half from lost home equity and rising insurance premiums.

As I’ve outlined, there are numerous CEQA violations with the Temecula route. I ask this Council to force SDG&E to complete the exhaustive engineering studies needed for a full Environmental Impact Report.

I am confident these studies will prove this route is unsafe, legally indefensible, and too expensive for them to pursue.

In the meantime, I urge this Council to spend this summer funding our own independent technical experts and forming a unified opposition coalition with the Pechanga Tribe, and our allies in the Imperial Valley, Anza-Borrego, and San Clemente.

Thank you

Good afternoon, Mayor Alexander and City Council members.

I’m Jim Schloss, a Temecula resident. I’ve spent 40 years as an electrical engineer, and I hold a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois.

• The Power Link creates an unmitigable industrial footprint as our new dominant landmark. This eight-mile wall of thirty, 190-foot towers will dwarf Pechanga Resort and permanently destroy the scenic beauty driving our tourism.

• The creek corridor is under 450 feet wide, meaning the Power Link easement will unavoidably infringe on three schools, 400 homes, Pechanga's golf course, and multiple city parks.

• With flanking homes and commercial buildings leaving no room on the banks, the towers must go directly into the creek bed. This placement guarantees the destruction of protected Temecula Creek wetlands and sensitive species.

• The route travels directly across the active Lake Elsinore fault, parallels the Wildomar branch, and cuts right through a designated liquefaction zone.

• The Power Link drops a permanent 'linear ignition source' into a high- wildfire-severity zone where Santa Ana winds and seismic risks multiply the danger.

• The route cuts Temecula in half at Temecula Creek. The Power Link can potentially block or bottleneck evacuation routes during a disaster.

• The danger posed by the massive electrical towers will effectively ground our sunrise hot air balloon industry, destroying a cornerstone of Temecula’s tourism economy and visual identity.

I estimate the Power Link will cause $1 billion in cumulative economic damage: half from a sharp decline in wine tourism, and half from lost home equity and rising insurance premiums.

I am confident these studies will prove this route is unsafe, legally indefensible, and too expensive for them to pursue.

Thank you

Jim Schloss

Temecula CA

(

Temecula City Council Meeting, 5/26/2026

1 From:Aria Goldendoodle <
Sent:Monday, May 25, 2026 12:30 AM
To:[email protected]
Subject:OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK PROJECT IN

TEMECULA
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK PROJECT IN TEMECULA

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing as a deeply concerned Temecula resident and homeowner regarding the proposed SDG&E power line and tower project planned near our neighborhood. My family and I strongly oppose this project because of the serious dangers and permanent damage it would bring to our community.

Our home overlooks the exact area where one of these massive towers is expected to be placed. If this project moves forward, we would be forced to live every day with the fear of wildfire danger, health concerns, noise, destruction of wildlife habitat, and the collapse of our property value and quality of life.

Temecula is a beautiful family community, not an industrial zone. These giant utility structures would permanently scar the landscape and destroy the peaceful environment thousands of residents worked their entire lives to afford and enjoy.

Children at nearby schools, including Vail Ranch Middle School, would spend hours every day only a short distance from these dangerous towers and power lines. Families should not be expected to accept risks like this simply so a corporation can push through a project that offers no meaningful benefit to the people living here.

2 The wildfire danger alone is terrifying. Southern California has already suffered catastrophic fires, deaths, evacuations, and destroyed neighborhoods. If one of these towers sparks a fire during high winds and our homes burn, who will be responsible? Will SDG&E pay for our homes, our belongings, and the funerals of the people who die? Because families here know exactly how quickly fires spread in this region, and many of us truly believe lives will be lost if this project is approved.

Residents should not have to live with constant fear that a disaster could start directly outside their homes. No amount of corporate profit is worth risking human lives, children’s safety, wildlife, and entire neighborhoods.

This project feels like corporate greed being placed above the health, safety, and well- being of Temecula residents. The people who actually live here will be the ones left dealing with the consequences long after the project is built.

We strongly urge the City and all decision-makers to reject this proposal and protect the families, homes, wildlife, schools, and future of Temecula before irreversible damage is done.

Sincerely,

A Concerned Temecula Resident
Aria Ruderman

1 From:Rebecca Gale <
Sent:Monday, May 25, 2026 1:59 AM
To:Rebecca Gale
Subject:OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK PROJECT IN

TEMECULA
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern,

A massive powerline project cutting through peaceful land is not “progress.” It’s a nightmare waiting to happen.

What happens when giant industrial towers move into quiet neighborhoods, parks, creeks, and wilderness?

Fire risk.

Constant buzzing.

Destroyed views.

Falling property values.

Wildlife displacement.

Noise pollution.

Fear every single dry summer.

Families who worked their entire lives for peaceful homes could lose huge portions of their property value overnight. Imagine looking out your window and seeing giant metal towers instead of trees, sunsets, hills, and open sky.

People come here for peace.

For nature.

For silence.

For clean air.

For trails, creeks, parks, birds, dogs, horses, and wildlife.

2 Now imagine:
• Endless electrical humming day and night
• Dogs panicking from high-frequency buzzing sounds
• Birds disappearing from nesting areas
• Wildlife corridors destroyed
• Creek ecosystems damaged
• Increased wildfire danger during wind events
• Giant towers looming over neighborhoods forever
• Fear of long-term health impacts from constant exposure • Stress, anxiety, sleepless nights
• Families trapped in homes they can no longer sell for what they’re worth

What happens to children growing up under giant industrial lines? What happens to the peace people moved here for?
What happens when the wilderness dies and the land no longer feels alive?

These projects don’t just change landscapes.

They change lives.

One spark.

One equipment failure.

One dry season.

That’s all it takes.

People should not have to sacrifice their health, peace, homes, parks, wildlife, and future so corporations can carve industrial scars through communities that never wanted this.

Once the towers go up, the damage is permanent.

Sincerely,
Zoey, Gavin, Brennan. Gary, Rebecca Gale and Aria Ruderman Citizens Of Temecula

From:Tracy Lee Nash from Within The Light
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SDG&E
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 12:48:39 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good evening,
I am voicing my concerns and objections below with regards to the SDG&E power line project and I hope you take the time to read this email.

I am one of the early residents of this valley, having moved to Temecula in 1977 and spending nearly 25 years there before relocating to Menifee. To say that Temecula was an incredible place to live would be an understatement because it was, in fact, an amazing place to grow up, that is, until it became a scene for political tripe and controversial ideology over the years and once again, we're having to fight. Fight the
corporate greed and interests with this possible SDG&E project.

We have already lost and continue to lose several things as it relates to the "growth" of Temecula Valley including,
but not limited to, it's natural beauty, agricultural distinctiveness, ecological environment and overall eclectic character,
and the citizens, as a whole, will not sit by to avoid being an inconvenient hindrance for "the powers that be" and simply
watch the place we call home be reduced to another corporate takeover with this type of invasive endeavor SDG&E
plans. It certainly doesn't benefit the residents, but it does benefit those who desire profit over people and unfortunately,
it always seems to come down to money.

We don't need this type of infrastructure nor the negative impact it will have on our overall environment and most citizens
in this valley, the state as a whole if we're going to be honest, are SICK and TIRED of the power moves and grabs, the
arrogance and dismissiveness of subject matters such as placing power lines in towns, cities, counties, that the city council,
corporations and quite frankly, any other entities are seeking to construct, while pretending to care what the resident's think,
when they truly don't care and that's evident by the fact that most projects are approved even when a majority of the people
state they don't want it.

So...

LISTEN to the people. NOT the profiteers. LISTEN to those who will be most affected by this project; the homes they live
in, the businesses they own, the communities they desire to retain. NOT those who are solely focused on profitability. Make
a difference by actually being different. By being leaders, not followers, by having the backs of the town's occupants-not the
occupiers, aka corporations.

Thank you for your time,
Tracy Lee Nash

From:Lynn Martin
To:

Subject:Stop The Power Towers
Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 12:35:42 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern,
I have lived in Temecula for many years, and I am shocked that this power tower project is even being considered so close to homes, schools, and neighborhoods. The people making these decisions do not have to wake up every day staring at giant transmission towers outside their windows or worrying about what could happen during wildfire season, but we do.

My family moved here because Temecula was safe, beautiful, peaceful, and surrounded by nature. Approving this project would destroy that. Massive utility towers do not belong in residential communities where families are trying to raise children and enjoy a normal quality of life.

The fire risk alone should be enough to stop this project immediately. Everyone in California understands how quickly fires spread during dry conditions and high winds.

Entire communities have already burned across this state. If one of these towers fails, sparks a fire, or contributes to another disaster, what happens to the families living below them?
When our homes burn down, is SDG&E going to pay for everything we lose? Are they going to replace our homes, our pets, our memories, and our lives? Are they going to pay for all of our funerals if people die in a fire caused by this project? Because many residents genuinely believe that if these towers are installed here, tragedy is not a possibility — it is only a matter of time.

I am also deeply concerned about the impact this project would have on children attending nearby schools, local wildlife, traffic, noise, property values, and the mental stress placed on families forced to live near these enormous structures.

Residents should not be sacrificed so a corporation can expand infrastructure at the expense of the people who actually live here. Temecula is not an industrial wasteland. It is a community filled with families, small businesses, parks, schools, and neighborhoods that deserve protection.

Please listen to the people who call this area home. We are the ones who will suffer the consequences if this project moves forward.

I strongly urge the City and every agency involved to reject this proposal before irreversible harm is done to our community.

Sincerely,
A Temecula Homeowner

Lynn Martin

From:Aria Goldendoodle
To:

Subject:OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK PROJECT IN TEMECULA Date:Monday, May 25, 2026 12:29:54 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK PROJECT IN

TEMECULA
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing as a deeply concerned Temecula resident and homeowner regarding the proposed SDG&E power line and tower project planned near our neighborhood. My family and I strongly oppose this project because of the serious dangers and permanent damage it would bring to our community.

The wildfire danger alone is terrifying. Southern California has already suffered catastrophic fires, deaths, evacuations, and destroyed neighborhoods. If one of these towers sparks a fire during high winds and our homes burn, who will be responsible? Will SDG&E pay for our homes, our belongings, and the funerals of the people who die? Because families here know exactly how quickly fires spread in this region, and many of us truly believe lives will be lost if this project is approved.

This project feels like corporate greed being placed above the health, safety, and well-being of Temecula residents. The people who actually live here will be the ones left dealing with the consequences long after the project is built.

We strongly urge the City and all decision-makers to reject this proposal and protect the families, homes, wildlife, schools, and future of Temecula before irreversible damage is done.

Sincerely,
A Concerned Temecula Resident
Aria Ruderman

From:dschultz
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Please share my voice City Council Meeting May 26th 3:00p Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 11:53:31 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Honorable Members of the City Council,
I am unable to attend the May 26 Council Meeting due to work. Please share my statement and concerns:

I am writing to urge you to formally and strongly oppose the proposed routing of the Golden Pacific PowerLink project through Temecula.

While regional energy needs are important, constructing 150-to-200-foot overhead transmission lines through our valley will cause irreversible harm to our community.

This project threatens Temecula's future in several critical ways:

1. Economic Devastation: The massive industrial towers will permanently disfigure the scenic landscapes that drive our vital wine, outdoor, and resort tourism economies.

2. Elevated Wildfire Risk: Placing high-voltage infrastructure into designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones introduces severe, unacceptable ignition risks to our residents.

3. Environmental Destruction: Overhead lines will slice through critical, native wildlife corridors, causing habitat fragmentation and endangering local bird populations.

4. Cultural Disrespect: The proposed route encroaches directly onto lands of immense cultural and historical significance to the Pechanga Band of Indians.

5. Property Value Loss: Towering structures will ruin the rural character of our neighborhoods, causing residential property values to plummet.

We look to the City Council to protect Temecula’s safety, economy, environment, and heritage. Please advocate for our community by demanding a complete rejection or major rerouting of this destructive project.

Thank you for your time, leadership, and dedication to protecting our city.

Sincerely,
Dina Schultz
Temecula East Wine Country

From:Gary Ruderman
To:Gary Ruderman
Subject:OPPOSITION TO THE GOLDEN PACIFIC POWER LINK PROJECT IN TEMECULA Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 10:50:58 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern,
Our home overlooks the exact location where one of these towers would be placed directly below us. If this project moves forward, we would be forced to leave the area to protect our health, safety, and quality of life.

This project places our entire community at risk through increased fire danger, serious health concerns, destruction of wildlife habitat, and devastating loss of property values. It would permanently transform Temecula from the beautiful community families chose to live in into an industrialized landscape filled with massive utility towers and urban blight.

Thousands of nearby homes would be negatively impacted. Children at Vail Ranch Middle School would spend hours each day just yards away from these dangerous structures. Families should not be forced to live with these risks imposed on them for a project that provides no benefit to our community.

We strongly oppose this project and urge the City to protect our neighborhoods, our children, our wildlife, and the character of Temecula before irreversible damage is done.

We need environmental and real estate lawyers to help stop this project and protect the people who live here.

This is corporate greed being placed above the health, safety, and well- being of residents. There is no benefit to the families whose homes, views,

property values, and peace of mind will be destroyed.

From:Marlene Illes
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SDG&E power lines
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 9:12:11 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Sent from my iPhone. I do not want these power lines anywhere near my home, they are a great fire danger. We don’t want a repeat of fires that happened in Los Angeles. Please reconsider these plans for Temecula. Thank you.

Marlene Illes

From:

To:Randi Johl
Subject:Power lines
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 8:34:28 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern, my husband and I have lived here since 1989 and there's been a lot of protests that we've had for power lines going up by us in Rainbow Canyon area you wanted a quarry there before and a water park and we feel that we do not want this type of power lines and environmental stuff happening around our area please take into consideration if you live around here if you would want your children and your house being close to this type of situation. Thank you Leah and Richard Ragland
Sent from AOL on Android

From:Shawnda Kovacs
To:Randi Johl
Subject:golden pacific powerlink
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 7:17:08 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello!
This is less than a mile from my house. I moved to Temecula for better health. This is in direct opposition to why we moved here.

As a concerned resident of Southwest Riverside County, I respectfully urge the County to take immediate and aggressive action regarding any proposed 500 kV transmission corridor involving approximately 200-foot industrial transmission towers near Temecula-area neighborhoods, schools, evacuation corridors, and protected ecological lands.

While the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) may ultimately oversee portions of transmission line permitting, Riverside County possesses substantial authority and influence related to land use compatibility, public safety, wildfire risk, emergency evacuation planning, environmental review, transportation impacts, regional planning consistency, and protection of County-managed open space resources.

I respectfully request that Riverside County exercise every available legal and procedural authority to oppose, restrict, reroute, or substantially modify any proposal that would place industrial-scale transmission towers near established communities including Morgan Hill, Redhawk, Temecula Creek neighborhoods, Vail Ranch Middle School, and the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve corridor.

Specifically, I urge the County to pursue the following actions:
• Adopt formal County resolutions opposing above-ground 500 kV transmission towers within close proximity to residential communities, schools, and ecological preserves. • Establish and advocate for minimum setback standards including:
- 1,500-foot minimum setbacks from residential communities, - 2,000-foot setbacks from schools and youth facilities, - and 2,500-foot setbacks from ecological preserves, riparian corridors, and scenic open-space areas. • Require comprehensive wildfire risk analysis addressing:
- ignition potential,
- tower collapse scenarios,
- impacts to aerial firefighting operations,
- evacuation bottlenecks,
- and cumulative fire behavior in high wind events.
• Utilize County authority under CEQA to demand full Environmental Impact Reports evaluating:

- biological impacts,
- visual degradation,
- public health concerns,
- cumulative environmental impacts,
- property value impacts,
- and feasible undergrounding alternatives.
• Advocate that all feasible residential-adjacent portions of any transmission corridor be undergrounded. • Protect County scenic corridors, trails, preserves, habitat linkages, and recreation areas from industrial visual intrusion and fragmentation.
• Coordinate opposition efforts with local cities, school districts, fire agencies, tribal governments, conservation organizations, and affected residents.

The proposed scale of these towers is fundamentally incompatible with the rural-residential and community-oriented character of Southwest Riverside County. These are not minor utility structures. They are industrial-scale facilities that would permanently alter community character, scenic landscapes, wildfire safety conditions, and quality of life for thousands of residents.

This region already faces extreme wildfire danger and evacuation concerns. Introducing massive transmission infrastructure near densely populated neighborhoods and constrained evacuation corridors creates serious long-term public safety concerns that deserve the highest level of scrutiny.

Residents deserve meaningful protection, transparent review, and full consideration of less harmful alternatives.

I respectfully ask Riverside County to stand firmly in defense of its communities, environmental resources, wildfire safety priorities, and long-term planning objectives by using every available authority to oppose or significantly restrict placement of 500 kV industrial transmission towers near Southwest Riverside County residential communities and preserves.

Thank you for your consideration and service to the residents of Riverside County.

Sincerely,
Shawnda kovacs
Sent from my iPhone

From:Christina Zandstra
To:Randi Johl
Subject:PowerLink Discussion Comment
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 7:16:18 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello -
My husband and I are unable to attend the upcoming City Council meeting on 5/26, but we wanted to express our concern and opposition regarding the PowerLink proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to add to the discussion:

We are highly concerned and opposed to the proposed Powerlink project in Temecula due to concerns about wildfire risk, declining property values, and potential long-term health impacts from placing high-voltage power lines near residential neighborhoods.

Temecula is known for its family communities, scenic wine country, and tourism destinations like Pechanga. Large transmission towers and power lines could negatively affect the beauty and character of the area, hurting both tourism and local businesses that rely on visitors.

Residents should not have to sacrifice safety, quality of life, and property values for infrastructure that could be placed elsewhere or approached with safer alternatives.

We urge decision-makers to reconsider this proposal and prioritize solutions that better protect our community.

Christina and Logan Zandstra
Sent from my iPhone

From:Chuck Ogle
To:Council Comments
Subject:SDG&E electric towers
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 7:03:10 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am strongly opposed to SDG&E running electric towers through Temecula Creek. It would create an eyesore to what is now a lovely view which we truly desire. Of course, it would also lower the value of the properties in our neighborhood. Please do not allow SDG&E to destroy the area by installing these unsightly towers along Temecula Creek.

My name is Charles Ogle. I own the house at Our home backs up the Temecula Creek.

From:Betsy Lowrey
To:Ariel Gebhard; Council Assistant
Cc:Council Comments
Subject:RE: Opposition to Proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink Route Through Temecula Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 6:26:04 PM
Hello Ariel --

Our office acknowledges receipt of your comments. I see you cannot attend the meeting on Tuesday but fyi-

For your information, the topic is on the City Council Agenda for an in-person public meeting at City Hall scheduled this Tuesday, May 26, 2026, at 3 pm. NOTE: While the item appears later on the Agenda (linked here), the City Manager’s Office expects the Mayor to exercise her prerogative to move the item closer to the 3 pm start time to best accommodate the public. If you choose to attend, you can expect a presentation from City staff and/or San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) regarding the Golden Pacific Powerlink Transmission Project, including 500-kilovolt electric transmission lines and tower/pole structures proposed through the City of Temecula. Also, as with any public meeting business item, the public will be given time to speak on the topic, should you wish to also share your comments at this public meeting. If so, you may need to arrive early to fill out a Speaker Slip. The City Council will discuss the project and provide general direction.

Thank you,

Betsy Lowrey
Assistant to the City Manager
City of Temecula
(951) 693-3959
[email protected]
TemeculaCA.gov
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

From: Ariel Gebhard
Cc: Zak Schwank ; Jessica Alexander
; James Stewart ; Brenden
Kalfus ; Matt Rahn
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink Route Through Temecula

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula City Council,
I am a Temecula resident, homeowner, and mother, and I am writing to express my strong

concern regarding the proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink transmission line project through Temecula.

I am deeply concerned about the potential impact this project could have on the health, safety, and quality of life of our community, including my children, my neighbors, and future generations of Temecula residents. The idea of massive 500-kV transmission towers and high- voltage power lines being routed near residential communities, schools, parks, open spaces, and environmentally sensitive areas is extremely concerning.

In addition to concerns regarding wildfire risk, environmental damage, visual impact, noise, and declining property values, many residents are worried about the possible long-term health impacts associated with living near high-voltage transmission infrastructure. As a parent, I do not believe projects of this scale belong near family neighborhoods and growing residential communities.

Temecula is known for its beauty, family-centered communities, and preserved open spaces. I respectfully ask the City to oppose routing this project through Temecula neighborhoods and environmentally sensitive areas and to advocate for safer alternatives that do not negatively impact our city and residents.

Although I am unable to attend the meeting on Tuesday May 26th at 3:00pm in person, I ask that this email be included in the public record and considered during all discussions regarding this proposal.

Thank you for your time, leadership, and for representing the voices and concerns of Temecula residents.

God Bless,
Ariel Gebhard

Temecula resident who would be directly impacted by this

From:Betsy Lowrey
To:MIMI CHANG
Cc:Council Comments; Randi Johl
Subject:RE: Public Comment Opposing Proposed Power Line Project Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 6:10:52 PM
Hello Mimi --

Our office acknowledges receipt of your comments.

Thank you,

Betsy Lowrey
Assistant to the City Manager
City of Temecula
(951) 693-3959
[email protected]
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Visit our Website
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

-----Original Message-----
From: MIMI CHANG ; Jessica Alexander
; Brenden Kalfus ; James
Stewart ; Matt Rahn
Cc: Council Assistant ; Council Comments
; Randi Johl
Subject: Public Comment Opposing Proposed Power Line Project

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the City Clerk and Members of the Temecula City Council,

Please include this email in the public record regarding the proposed power line project currently under consideration.

Specifically, I urge the City to pursue the following protections:

• Minimum 1,500-foot setbacks from existing residential neighborhoods, including Morgan Hill, Redhawk, Temecula Creek communities, and adjacent residential developments.

• Minimum 2,000-foot setbacks from schools, youth facilities, parks, and athletic fields, including Vail Ranch Middle School.

• Minimum 2,500-foot setbacks from ecological preserves, riparian corridors, and scenic open-space resources, including the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve and Temecula Creek corridor.

• Mandatory analysis of wildfire ignition risk, emergency evacuation impacts, aerial firefighting interference, and cumulative environmental impacts.

• Formal City advocacy for undergrounding alternatives wherever technically feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

would be protected from industrial-scale infrastructure intrusion.

This issue extends far beyond aesthetics. It directly impacts:

- wildfire safety,
- evacuation reliability,
- property values,
- community planning,
- environmental preservation,
- and quality of life for thousands of residents.

Thank you for your consideration and continued commitment to protecting the residents and character of Temecula.

Sincerely,
Mimi Chang
Temecula Resident

From: John Bischoff <
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2026 3:47 PM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: Golden Pacific Powerlink
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I read that you are the person we should be reaching out to in regards to submitting public statements/comments for public record in regards to the Golden Pacific Powerlink line potentially going through Temecula.

I've lived in Morgan Hill between Butterfield and the 79 since 2013. I am submitting pictures taken from my home on of four separate fires that required drop aircraft in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. These fires were located near or on the spot they plan to construct the power lines. If those power lines existed then, they would have blocked water drop aircraft from being used which would have put our homes, property and lives in even more danger.

In Temecula we regularly get winds 20 - 30 mph out here with gusts sometimes up to 70+ mph. The fact they are even suggesting constructing these power lines to go through our neighborhood after what happened at the Eaton fire last year is absolutely insane. May I remind you that the Eaton fire was caused by high tension power lines resulting in more than 9,000 buildings destroyed and 19 lives lost.

If it is so critical that these power lines need to go through Temecula then they should be completely underground. While this is a more costly solution, the alternative isn't fair to us Temecula residents by decreasing our home values and increasing our home insurance costs. More importantly these power lines would increase the fire risk to our homes and properties so that the people who are actually receiving this power can save an extra 1%to 3% on their electric bills.

John Bischoff
1 :_ . . • _...,IS;. • ..-„-;•;,.•,• k...,.:;;,-..i.4..,-,4( 1%14 14 , _22 listt..y,. ,..,-. ..:„.. .....•
!,...,,,..., . . ..
_
.A‘
...Ilk% r -•.-- ..r..4
,h
',k ..... .

A.- • .,:v. .44,-;
. t.
• , ,..., ...i.,,,.,:.-.4-......,- - • ,., 11% ..„---„,-0,„..,-7-7,-;7 •,r,• ,_.,.1..; 'al
...
4"
II-
r:. iv.,...L.v.v.i.g. ••'.- . -N:. 44A, I
-
'-•''•
-':.•1:_.';',-;7.-;.'''..- ''....--': 7'''.---..'-'':''..-.. -• '' '''''''. ' '. . rsi
t•
tiC14..1:7'..-.i'

7. - ......... . . , • , -
i';:e' 1'''';i-,4',:f-,-.;--..- - : • ,
c
.,
.. .,
,----,..-.- --
_ . ..
.F.. it ';••-•'" '%z r;:._• ',''-"•. '.. :' •:
,
V.
ra•-•,.".1" .itt' ;,,,''.:7•". - ' -' . - - • .
•. .
-.7,.•.;' - -. .-:.,...., . , ' . . '-',... . .,
..,
:-
, ..
' .-,...'",et4....‘ 4'' '- •1:-..... ,k2t.,,,,
•'f.m ...t ..,,,.\.'4_:.... ,.,:AI,',','47,4 4,-.,:Pit,i, '•
' ' Wr.1' j t..',.- Caii."41.•4''..,,,, ,',itc,:.
••." ,.,.. ..,,ik., .,4.,
4i.7i•SW47...--.1:7;',.''',-."'-';A:',-...1n.
--,,, '..-...:-.4-- -..--.,,...„.• =.7,-,--,?.: :,.=..-'7.-:, 2,,,./4,ti-..;. _ :.,...+.4::,-4,,,,,,,,...;,,,,i;',..i... ..•:'!".4....V .-,.:01-",,,,,

2...."_;
1 .?-P?':'.-j..1',I.1:::7.,:.
it . ',, ‘0,4.<,::: ...•' r-,':' • -' -ki,.,4..-•‘,-• -A.'Z 3..--.. ..-0-;-‹ -,.. "...": '. ii.-0..k:-: k„z,....,, , ..'•.-,-,-,••,-,,-;.-:, ;,11,-....14-,,,at, ,.: ,,....,. ,-,,,\.•., . .: --;,'•....-...,:-ck-.•04,-,0,14,..i ....-_, I.,71 et; 4-;•`,.. - - . -•, . •
• '''-, ',...::4.,-.,•s?,5 .
''''::'' .--7,.':--::- ' . • • .'' 4 , .. .4'b,,k . • N ."-.-,-. ..
:' .'4;.';;::*.;.' ,).' 'Vf` , .t'.''..':'4:''..i.•--- '' ,..:;[...74.;;;', •
VrJV .
' r, ',,-c.,1,•• '• . ..
it: . -
,.,-,.....

•
;r ,,, k?r Myi' ' ,,, , Y �A•6 A�yf` .. r M f ? •
''"p"Y �Jn..

E .A
•
t e tt
r {
k a i m s C l+f .�
t
Kl Y
-i .as @�, t r` '' r .sc°„'*•.
si
r. . '.. ,
Iiir
I
.,. .-. .--. - it r
a
S
rrt .e
I
- A •r• may..-..l`-1. 4 - .",
s-.fir rh l �fd�
4 .
3 : I
,
{
1 NN
N1Y'1 I!N/

M WIZ'',
1 • M; �1N I
N I
I
�v, II N NI
!•I♦i ji I.j Cr
-s.. NIIIIN r
II,Z
I♦ ♦.•,NNi tSl
14 j
a. .
.1 I
I, ::
_ Mr
• I
i ,J,,
-'„-ti!
.� ;:

I'tf )• �1

1 From:Mo Green https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&aep=42&udm=50&q=what+percentage+will+home s+loose+value+if+200+ft+electrical+power+lines+are+near&mstk=AUtExfDmLGSyVzDKBldY561G49reU ZPisSBb1De3MygwFmQEe_ig8HzpvWIAhI19wXVUcYThn19n-s5DAiT08-kUj62B2aegcqT- aWsRwScZHK4WMk4Y3jj53KlnfkDgIj-
Qs2fwcBw02kAo4381WlzYmxU8RVAB9F1NQNU3jXZzeIHQh_upV_zN_E64JFOpZVkGZCI7eDIRuvw1HkO Ls8bLVXJ6iqhTQoNFoxUBxvsd5r5IZhwyqo0eI3MRTMy0tuZPxs6ZeFQHrFS9zD5qrc_t3wUn8b3KOGzaeeE &csuir=1&mtid=mVYTapnaBIqIkPIP9OmWyAY

From:Michael & Natalie Garcia
To:Council Comments
Subject:Public Comment May 26 Meeting - SDG&E Powerline Project OPPOSED Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 12:25:06 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor & Council Members,
My name is Natalie Garcia and I am a resident of Temecula, living in the Redhawk community, at I have been a resident for 18 years and moved to Temecula from San Diego for all the things our community offers that San Diego does not - namely suburban, quiet living. I am writing to submit my public comment regarding the San Diego Gas & Electric proposed powerlink project being presented at the May 26 meeting.

I want to voice my concerns and very strong opposition for this project. Specifically, the proposal to run 140 miles of 500-kV high-voltage transmission lines and massive tower structures through our city, near our homes, including near Temecula Parkway - this will have nothing but negative impacts on our beautiful city and our community. We do not want these metal structures ranging from 80 to over 200 feet tall in our city.

This project will disrupt wildlife, put residents' health at risk, put our homes at risk from potential wildfires and limited evacuation routes (do we need to be the next Alta Dena/Palisades disaster?), industrialize and make Temecula unattractive, decrease our property values, potentially decrease tourism, certainly not encourage anyone to move to the area if these massive, industrialized structures are approved. Keep Temecula as it is, ever evolving & growing yes, but not like this. Keep our town suburban, good schools, low crime and do not give in to SDG&E. The project is not good for our city and should not even be entertained.

I urge the City Council to remember that you were voted into office to protect this community and advocate for the residents of Temecula. Do not entertain this project, it is not enough to approve a project like this with "environmental oversight". The damage will be done before one tower even goes up - DO NOT APPROVE it. Push for SDG&E to explore unincorporated areas in San Diego Country first and foremost and do not compromise Temecula's natural landscape and neighborhoods.

Thank you for your time, leadership, and ongoing dedication to protecting Temecula.

Sincerely,
Natalie Garcia

From:Betsy Lowrey
To:Sharon Brown; Council Assistant
Cc:Council Comments
Subject:Re: Stop The Power Lines!
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 11:25:59 AM
Good morning Sharon,
Your comments have been received.

Also, as with any public meeting business item, the public will be given time to speak on the topic, should you wish to also share your comments at this public meeting. If so, you may need to arrive early to fill out a Speaker Slip. The City Council will discuss the project and provide general direction.

Thank you,
Betsy Lowrey, Assistant to the City Manager
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
951-693-3959 office
From: Sharon Brown
Subject: Stop The Power Lines!

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern, Our home, was bought for the beautiful wildlife behind our home, where our kids grew up exploring. This proposed power line development needs to be stopped ASAP. Residents deserve peace, nature, and EMF-free living. I urge you to please consider the right choice and please shut this project down.

Thank you,
Sharon Brown

From:Sharon Brown
To:Council Comments; Randi Johl
Subject:comments for upcoming meeting
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 10:28:35 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello, I'm a homeowner at in Temecula.

Temecula Creek is not vacant land waiting for industrial development. It is a living ecosystem that supports countless native species and provides one of the last remaining natural wildlife corridors in our community.

Coyotes move through the brush at night. Bobcats roam the hillsides. Hawks circle above the canyon. Great blue herons stand along the creek banks at sunrise. Owls, quail, rabbits, foxes, turtles, frogs, bats, bees, butterflies, and countless other species depend on this habitat for survival.

This landscape is connected by water, native vegetation, open space, and migration paths that have existed for generations.

The proposed 500kV transmission towers threaten to permanently damage this fragile environment. Construction would disrupt wildlife, destroy native vegetation, fragment habitats, increase erosion, disturb nesting areas, and forever alter the natural character of Temecula Creek.

This issue is bigger than power towers.

It is about protecting the wildlife and natural spaces that cannot speak for themselves. It is about preserving the beauty, ecology, and identity of Temecula before irreversible
industrial infrastructure changes it forever.

I urge the City Council to oppose the Golden Pacific PowerLink route through Temecula Creek and protect this irreplaceable habitat for future generations.

Thank you, Sharon Brown

From:Chris Arredondo Jr
To:Randi Johl; [email protected]
Cc:CMDCM Chris Arredondo Jr
Subject:Strong Opposition to the Proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink Route Through Temecula Communities Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 10:08:08 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing as a deeply concerned homeowner and resident living adjacent to the Temecula Creek area at Temecula, CA 92592, to formally express my strong opposition to the currently proposed routing of the Golden Pacific Powerlink transmission project through Temecula communities, residential neighborhoods, scenic open space, and family-centered areas.

Like many residents, my family and I chose to purchase our home in Temecula because of the unique beauty, character, open space, safety, and quality of life this community offers. Had massive 150–200 foot high- voltage transmission towers and associated infrastructure been present or planned in our immediate backyard or surrounding community, we would never have chosen to invest our lives and financial future here.

The proposed routing near Temecula Creek, Wine Country, Vail Lake, Galway Downs, schools, parks, trails, and residential neighborhoods is completely incompatible with the character and vision of our community.

The impacts of this project would be permanent, destructive, and far- reaching.

Residents have serious concerns regarding:
• Significant negative impacts to property values and homeowner investments
• Destruction of scenic views and the natural beauty that defines Temecula

• Potential health concerns associated with proximity to high-voltage transmission infrastructure
• Increased wildfire and fire safety risks in an already fire-prone region • Harm to wildlife, habitat, and environmentally sensitive open space • Damage to Temecula’s tourism economy, Wine Country identity, and equestrian communities
• Reduced quality of life for families and children living near these corridors
• Visual blight caused by industrial-scale transmission towers dominating residential landscapes
Beyond the impacts themselves, many residents are frustrated and alarmed by what feels like a lack of transparency and meaningful public awareness regarding this proposal. A project of this magnitude should never move forward without extensive public engagement, full environmental scrutiny, and serious evaluation of alternatives that avoid established residential and recreational areas.

Temecula is not an industrial corridor. It is a family-oriented, scenic, and growing community that residents have worked hard to build and protect.

I strongly urge the City of Temecula, Riverside County leadership, and all involved agencies to oppose the current proposed route and demand that alternative routing options be identified that move this project away from neighborhoods, schools, parks, trails, Temecula Creek, Wine Country, and other populated or environmentally sensitive areas.

At a minimum, residents deserve:
• Full transparency regarding all proposed routes and long-term impacts • Comprehensive environmental and fire safety review
• Independent analysis of impacts to property values and community health • Meaningful public involvement before any approvals move forward • Serious consideration of alternative routes that avoid Temecula residential communities altogether

Our community should not bear the burden of a project that threatens the very qualities that make Temecula a desirable place to live, raise families, and invest in our future.

I respectfully ask that you stand with Temecula residents and oppose the current proposed routing through our community.

Sincerely,
Christopher E. Arredondo Jr.

Temecula, CA 92592
(

From:Betsy Lowrey
To:Linda Woodruff; Council Assistant; Council Comments
Subject:Re: Golden Pacific Powerlink - a Temecula citizen"s opinion Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 9:29:47 AM
Good morning Linda,
Your comments have been received.

Thank you,
Betsy Lowrey, Assistant to the City Manager
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
951-693-3959 office
From: Linda Woodruff ; Jessica Alexander
; Brenden Kalfus ; James
Stewart ; Matt Rahn ; Council
Assistant ; [email protected]

Subject: Golden Pacific Powerlink - a Temecula citizen's opinion

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula Council Members and Staff,
Thank you for taking the time to read this email concerning the proposed project of building 500kV power line towers on the creek bed along Hwy 79. I am unable to attend the meeting on the 26th but feel a great responsibility to voice my opposition to this project.

My husband and I moved to Temecula in 2011 from San Diego. We have been extremely happy here in Paloma del Sol. We LOVE the beautiful vistas we see as we drive through the city - nearby rocky hillsides and the wide open space feeling of this city. No highrise buildings, no freeways cutting through the heart of the city. The "feeling" of this place was the reason we moved here. I was shocked and heartbroken to hear of the truly horrific proposal to build the power monstrosities in our town.

My husband and I grew up in Torrance, California in the 1950's & '60's. I lived on 177th Street between Prairie Ave and Hawthorne Blvd. There were very tall power line structures all along the argriculural area (we called it 'the field') behind the houses built on the south side of 177th. The eerie sounds, crackling, the ugliness of the towers are forever etched in my memory of my childhood home and those growing-up years. Nothing about it was good. It was all negative.

Here in Temecula we have even more to lose.

Please, please I ask you all to do your best to stop this proposal from becoming a reality.

I thank you for reading my plea for help.

Sincerely,
Linda Woodruff

Temecula, CA 92592

Download Attachment
Available until Jun 22, 2026
From:Betsy Lowrey
To:Rebecca Gale
Cc:Council Assistant; Council Comments; Randi Johl
Subject:Re: Official Public Statement Regarding the Proposed Golden Pacific PowerLink 500 kV Transmission Corridor Through Temecula
Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 9:23:55 AM
Good Morning, Rebecca-

Your comments have been received.

Thank you,

Betsy Lowrey, Assistant to the City Manager
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
951-693-3959 office
From: Rebecca Gale ; Jessica Alexander
; Brenden Kalfus ; James
Stewart ; Matt Rahn
Cc: Council Assistant ; Council Comments
; Randi Johl
Subject: Official Public Statement Regarding the Proposed Golden Pacific PowerLink 500 kV Transmission Corridor Through Temecula

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor and Members of the Temecula City Council,
Two years ago, a wildfire broke out near our neighborhood close to Temecula Parkway and Anza Road beside Temecula Creek.

And what terrified me most was how quickly it spread because of the powerful winds that move through this area.

This part of Temecula is an extreme wind corridor. The gusts that move through here in the evenings are some of the strongest I have ever experienced in my life. Within moments, the fire spread rapidly near homes and multiple water tankers had to respond to stop it from spreading further.

Watching a fire move that quickly near your home changes you forever.

Now imagine introducing giant 500 kV transmission towers into this same high-wind environment directly beside homes, schools, parks, trails, and wildlife habitat.

Every windstorm would create anxiety for families living nearby.

Every red flag warning would create fear.

Residents would constantly wonder whether the next fire could begin beneath those towers while water tankers race overhead trying to save neighborhoods that never should have been placed beside industrial transmission infrastructure in the first place.

And for what?

I live near the corner of Temecula Parkway and Anza Road, where I have seen beautiful hot air balloons floating peacefully over Temecula Creek, the exact area where this proposed transmission route would begin.

That landscape explains why people moved here.

Families chose this part of Temecula because of the quiet hills, open space, wildlife, horseback trails, scenic creek views, and the feeling that this area was still peaceful, natural, and safe.

People invested their life savings into living near this environment.

And now somehow we are discussing placing massive 500 kV industrial transmission towers directly through the middle of it.

From an environmental perspective, a public safety perspective, a planning perspective, and a community quality-of-life perspective, this proposal should deeply concern every resident in Temecula.

Recent public reporting also shows that Temecula officials and residents are already pushing back strongly against this proposal because of the enormous impacts it could have on neighborhoods, schools, wildlife habitat, open space, wildfire safety, and overall community character.

According to recent public reporting, the proposed Golden Pacific PowerLink route would carry transmission towers reportedly ranging from approximately 120 to 190 feet tall through parts of Temecula, including the Temecula Creek corridor.

This power is not even primarily for Temecula.

So Temecula residents would absorb the wildfire fears, environmental destruction, visual blight, years of construction, nonstop industrial noise, safety concerns, declining property values, and growing health concerns while the benefits are directed somewhere else entirely.

That does not make sense.

Temecula Creek is not empty land.

It is one of the last major connected wildlife corridors remaining in this region.

At night, the creek comes alive with nature. There is a symphony of frogs echoing through the canyon while coyotes howl through the hills. Residents regularly see hawks, owls, bobcats, rabbits, possums, raccoons, turtles, snakes, birds, pollinators, and countless native species moving throughout the corridor.

This is their habitat.

This is their home.

And wildlife has no voice in this process.

Once a corridor like this is fragmented by giant industrial towers, maintenance roads, vegetation clearing, construction activity, and years of industrial disturbance, the damage becomes permanent.

Where are these animals supposed to go?
The environmental consequences of destroying one of the last connected

natural corridors in Temecula cannot simply be reversed later.

There is also an emotional and human side to this project that cannot be ignored.

This is an outdoors community.

Families here spend their lives outside. People bike through the Temecula Creek trails every day. Families hike there every morning with their dogs and children. Horseback riders travel through the hills constantly. Parents bring their kids to the parks and open space because this is one of the last peaceful natural areas left in Temecula.

My dog is a huge part of my life, and one of our favorite places is walking along the Temecula Creek trails near where these towers are proposed.

That entire experience would change forever.

Many families would no longer feel comfortable bringing their children or pets near giant industrial transmission towers, nonstop electrical buzzing, heavy construction, maintenance roads, and massive steel structures dominating the landscape.

Dogs have extremely sensitive hearing. Children have developing brains and growing bodies. Families should not have to spend years worrying about constant industrial noise, massive high-voltage infrastructure, wildfire fears, environmental damage, and potential long-term health concerns surrounding the places where their children play and their pets spend time outdoors.

This project would not just change a few views.

It would fundamentally change the entire feeling and identity of Temecula.

The peaceful outdoor lifestyle that families moved here for would slowly disappear beneath industrial infrastructure that does not belong in the middle of an established community.

Families are also deeply disturbed that these towers are proposed near neighborhoods and directly behind Vail Ranch Middle School. Children should not grow up surrounded by giant industrial power towers dominating the landscape where they live and learn.

Residents also have growing health concerns about living near massive 500 kV transmission infrastructure for decades.

I recently met a woman from Northern California who told me that several members of her family, including herself and her nephew, developed brain tumors after living near major transmission infrastructure for years.

Experiences like that deeply frighten families who are now being asked to accept giant industrial transmission towers directly beside their homes and schools.

Whether officials agree or disagree about long-term health risks, residents have every right to be concerned about constant exposure to massive high- voltage infrastructure directly beside neighborhoods where families live, sleep, raise children, and spend their lives.

And this is not the middle of nowhere.

This is Temecula.

This is a crowded, established family community filled with neighborhoods, schools, parks, equestrian trails, wildlife habitat, and homes.

A home is not just a structure.

For most families, a home represents decades of work, sacrifice, savings, and financial investment.

People invested their life savings into homes near Temecula Creek because this area was beautiful, peaceful, natural, and safe.

Now imagine discovering giant industrial transmission towers could be built directly behind your backyard.

No family moved here expecting that.

No homeowner wants to look out from their kitchen, patio, or bedroom window at giant steel towers dominating the landscape.

No parent wants children playing outside beneath industrial transmission infrastructure.

No resident wants years of nonstop construction trucks, heavy equipment, electrical buzzing, vibration, wildfire fears, health fears, and industrial disturbance surrounding the place they worked their entire life to afford.

Many homeowners along the creek could see their property values collapse.

Families could lose a massive portion of the value of the homes they spent years building toward because very few people would willingly choose to live beside giant industrial transmission towers.

This project would permanently alter the appearance, identity, safety, health, and quality of life of Temecula.

And once those towers are built, the beauty of this corridor will never truly return.

There are less populated alternatives.

Routing giant industrial transmission towers directly through the heart of Temecula when other routes exist feels extraordinarily irresponsible.

Temecula should not be sacrificed as a utility corridor for corporate interests while local residents are left dealing with the consequences forever.

Our homes, wildlife, parks, schools, trails, environment, safety, health, and community character deserve protection.

I respectfully urge the city to oppose this route and demand alternatives that do not permanently damage one of the last major natural corridors remaining in Temecula.

I am also including videos I personally took outside my window of the wildfire near the creek, along with videos of beautiful hot air balloons floating over Temecula Creek outside my window, the same peaceful landscape this project threatens to permanently change forever.

Please protect Temecula before irreversible damage is done.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Gale-Ruderman
Temecula Resident

Click to Download
FIRE.MOV
0 bytes

From:Kerstin Epting
To:Randi Johl
Cc:Mia Epting
Subject:Strong Opposition to the SDG&E Golden Pacific Powerlink Through Temecula Date:Sunday, May 24, 2026 7:24:07 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor, City Council Members, and City Staff,
I am writing as a proud resident of Temecula to express my strong and unequivocal opposition to the proposed SDG&E Golden Pacific Powerlink project — a 140-mile, 500-kilovolt high-voltage transmission line that would cut directly through our city along SR-79, Temecula Parkway, Temecula Creek, and the Santa Margarita River.

Temecula is the only incorporated city in the path of this powerlink, yet our residents, businesses, and natural landscapes would bear the full burden of 120- to 190-foot-tall industrial towers crossing our community — with no direct power benefit to Temecula customers, as our power is supplied by Southern California Edison, not SDG&E.

I urge the City Council to formally oppose this project and demand that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) reject this route.

HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERNS
The health risks associated with high-voltage power lines have been a subject of scientific research and public concern for decades. While no single study is definitive, the cumulative body of research raises serious red flags that we should not dismiss:
• Childhood Leukemia Risk: Multiple peer-reviewed studies — including research published in the Journal of Epidemiology and in ScienceDirect — have found elevated incidence rates of childhood leukemia and hematological malignancies among children residing within 100 to 300 meters of high-voltage power lines. One study found the risk to be more than double for children living closest to these lines. • Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposure: The 500-kV lines proposed are among the highest-voltage transmission lines in existence. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) has concluded that ELF-EMF exposures "cannot be recognized as entirely safe" due to evidence suggesting a leukemia hazard. This is not a risk any community should be asked to accept without consent. • Reported Symptoms: Residents near high-voltage lines consistently report non-specific health complaints including chronic headaches, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and neurological symptoms — impacts on quality of life that are very real regardless of the ongoing scientific debate. • Wildfire Hazard: Perhaps most urgently for Temecula, the proposed route runs through one of Riverside County's most fire-prone wind corridors along SR-79 and Temecula Parkway. High-voltage transmission lines are a documented ignition source for wildfires. Routing 500-kV towers through our wine country and creek corridors poses an unacceptable risk to residents, agriculture, and wildlife.

ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY IMPACT
Temecula Valley's economy is built on its scenic beauty, wine tourism, outdoor recreation, and resort hospitality.

Visit Temecula Valley and the Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association have both issued formal opposition to this project, warning of "irreversible damage to regional tourism, agricultural preservation, and public safety." The installation of 190-foot industrial towers across our wine country and creek corridors would permanently

compromise the very landscapes that drive thousands of local jobs and support our small businesses.

Additionally, proximity to high-voltage transmission infrastructure is well-documented to negatively affect residential property values — a significant concern for our 110,000+ residents.

A CALL FOR GREEN ALTERNATIVES
I respectfully ask that our City Council advocate loudly for the following alternatives:

1. Underground Transmission Lines: While more costly, undergrounding high-voltage lines eliminates visual blight, reduces wildfire ignition risk, and significantly lowers residential EMF exposure. Other communities and nations have implemented this successfully.

2. Alternative Routing: The CPUC review process must seriously consider routes that do not pass through any incorporated city or populated residential area. Routing through Temecula appears to have been chosen for convenience, not necessity.

3. Distributed Energy & Local Storage: Investment in local solar generation, battery storage, and distributed grid infrastructure can reduce the need for long-distance high-voltage transmission entirely — a truly green solution aligned with California's own energy goals.

4. Offshore Wind and Coastal Solutions: California's offshore wind resources, paired with strategic coastal substations, offer a path to regional energy independence without routing industrial infrastructure through inland communities like ours.

MY REQUEST TO THE COUNCIL
I respectfully ask that the Temecula City Council:
• Pass a formal resolution opposing the Golden Pacific Powerlink route through Temecula; • Demand that SDG&E and the CPUC conduct a rigorous environmental review that fully accounts for wildfire risk, EMF health impacts, and community economic harm;
• Advocate for undergrounding or full rerouting of this project; • Coordinate with neighboring cities, tribal governments, and advocacy groups to present a unified regional opposition; and
• Ensure our residents have every opportunity to be heard before any route is approved.

Temecula should not be forced to sacrifice its health, safety, scenic beauty, and property values for a transmission project that delivers no direct benefit to our community. I am asking you to stand firmly with us.

Thank you for your service to our city and for giving this matter the serious attention it deserves.

Respectfully,
Kerstin Epting
Temecula

Thanks,
Kerstin Epting

From:Jay Lauhon
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Golden Pacific Powerlink Proposal
Date:Saturday, May 23, 2026 6:54:16 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Ms Johl, we will appreciate that our message is read at the 3:00pm May 26, 2026 City Council Meeting.

Hello to Members of the Temecula City Council,
Thank you for the opportunity for my wife and I to express our thoughts regarding the Golden Pacific Powerlink proposal.

We have lived in Temecula for 26 years after relocating here from San Diego County.

Over the years as Temecula has grown and developed, a local culture and pleasing environment has been well sustained even with significant population growth. We are grateful that city leaders have valued the legacy of our area's founders.

We believe that construction of the proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink is not only destructive to our valued culture and environment, does not directly benefit the well being of Temecula, but also places a significant portion of our city at severe risk of fire dangers.

For these reasons we wish to communicate our strong opposition to the Golden Pacific Powerlink proposal.

Thank you for your consideration for our concerns.

Very best regards,
Bennie Lauhon
Jane Lauhon

Temecula, CA 92592

From:Linda Woodruff
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Golden Pacific Powerlink
Date:Saturday, May 23, 2026 3:55:55 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Randi Johl,
Thank you for taking the time to read this email concerning the proposed project of building 500kV power line towers on the creek bed along Hwy 79.

I am unable to attend the meeting on the 26th but feel a great responsibility to voice my opposition to this project.

Here in Temecula we have even more to lose.

Please, please I ask you all to do your best to stop this proposal from becoming a reality.

I thank you for reading my plea for help.

Sincerely,
Linda Woodruff

Temecula, CA 92592

Sent from my iPhone

From:RACHEL Bruemmer
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SDGE PROJECT
Date:Saturday, May 23, 2026 12:04:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

We people of Temecula do not want this.

Most importantly it's a Fire hazard and risk our land and homes. If a fire starts our they gonna pay for lives lost, homes etc. Can water tankers and helicopters drop water safely. NOOO
It impacts our beautiful views, our home values, our wild life, our businesses, are health and our safety. Most of all our PEACE.

For what MONEY in their pockets.

NOOO ‍♀ thank you.

Find another place .

Thank you
Rache Barnes
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android

From:Christopher Howard
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Opposition Golden Pacific Power Link
Date:Saturday, May 23, 2026 6:32:14 AM
Attachments:Temecula City Council.docx
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
Please disregard my previous email.

I will not be able to attend the May 26th Temecula City Council meeting.

I am requesting my comments and concerns be included in the public record for the next meeting.

Any questions please let me know.

V/R,
Christopher K Howard
Temecula Resident

To the Temecula City Council,

Specifically, I urge the City to pursue the following protections:

• Minimum 1,500-foot setbacks from existing residential neighborhoods, including Morgan Hill, Redhawk, Temecula Creek communities, and adjacent residential developments.

• Minimum 2,000-foot setbacks from schools, youth facilities, parks, and athletic fields, including Vail Ranch Middle School.

• Minimum 2,500-foot setbacks from ecological preserves, riparian corridors, and scenic open-space resources, including the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve and Temecula Creek corridor.

• Mandatory analysis of wildfire ignition risk, emergency evacuation impacts, aerial firefighting interference, and cumulative environmental impacts.

• Formal City advocacy for undergrounding alternatives wherever technically feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

The proposed scale of these towers would permanently alter the visual character, environmental integrity, and safety profile of our community. Temecula residents purchased

homes and raised families here with the expectation that our neighborhoods, schools, preserves, and scenic corridors would be protected from industrial-scale infrastructure intrusion.

This issue extends far beyond aesthetics. It directly impacts:

- wildfire safety,
- evacuation reliability,
- property values,
- community planning,
- environmental preservation,
- and quality of life for thousands of residents.

Thank you for your consideration and continued commitment to protecting the residents and character of Temecula.

Sincerely,

Christopher K Howard
Temecula Resident

From:EE
To:Randi Johl
Cc:Council Comments
Subject:Public comment for May 26 city council meeting on PowerLink Project Date:Friday, May 22, 2026 6:57:04 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

As a resident and homeowner in this community, I am deeply concerned about the long-term impacts that industrial-scale 500 kV transmission towers would have on public safety, wildfire risk, environmental resources, scenic landscapes, and overall quality of life in Southwest Riverside County.

Towers approaching 200 feet in height are completely incompatible with the residential character of Temecula and surrounding communities such as Morgan Hill, Redhawk, and Temecula Creek. These massive structures would permanently alter the visual character of our neighborhoods, open spaces, and scenic corridors.

In addition to their visual impact, high-voltage transmission lines can generate constant humming and crackling noise, particularly during damp or foggy conditions. Residents should not be subjected to ongoing industrial noise pollution near homes, schools, parks, trails, and outdoor recreation areas.

I am also very concerned about the potential human health impacts associated with prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) generated by 500 kV transmission infrastructure. many residents do not want industrial-scale high-voltage facilities placed near homes, schools, and areas where children and families spend time. These are valid concerns that warrant serious study, transparency, and precautionary setbacks from residential communities and sensitive land uses.

This region already faces severe wildfire danger and evacuation challenges. Bringing high- voltage lines through wildfire-prone areas near densely populated neighborhoods and limited evacuation corridors raises significant public safety concerns, including fire ignition risk, evacuation bottlenecks, tower failure scenarios, and interference with emergency response and aerial firefighting operations.

I am further concerned about impacts to local schools, parks, trails, wildlife habitat, and the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve corridor. These areas should be protected and preserved, not industrialized. We are being asked to bear all the severe liabilities without receiving any local benefit.

I respectfully urge decision-makers to require a full environmental review, comprehensive wildfire and evacuation analysis, independent health and noise studies, and a meaningful evaluation of undergrounding alternatives wherever feasible near residential communities and environmentally sensitive areas.

Our community deserves thoughtful planning, transparency, and meaningful protections. I respectfully ask that this project be opposed, rerouted, or significantly modified to prevent industrial-scale transmission towers from being placed near homes, schools, parks, and protected open spaces in Southwest Riverside County.

Regards,
Edith Estay

From:Betsy Lowrey
To:John Ellett
Cc:Randi Johl
Subject:FW: SDG&E Golden Pacific Powerlink Project
Date:Friday, May 22, 2026 5:43:54 PM
Attachments:Redhawk_Letter to City Council_Powerline Project_05-22-26_signed.pdf Good evening, John-

Your comments have been received. Per your request, your comments will be forwarded to the City Council (bcc’d here), as well as the City Clerk, cc’d here.

For your information, and that of the Redhawk Community Association, the topic item is on the City Council Agenda for an in-person public meeting at City Hall scheduled this Tuesday, May 26, 2026, at 3 pm. NOTE: While the item appears later on the Agenda (linked here), the City Manager’s Office expects the Mayor to exercise her prerogative to move the item closer to the 3 pm start time to best accommodate the public. If you choose to attend, you can expect a presentation from City staff and/or San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) regarding the Golden Pacific Powerlink Transmission Project, including 500-kilovolt electric transmission lines and tower/pole structures proposed through the City of Temecula. Also, as with any public meeting business item, the public will be given time to speak on the topic, should you wish to also share your comments at this public meeting. If so, you may need to arrive early to fill out a Speaker Slip. The City Council will discuss the project and provide general direction.

Thank you,

From: John Ellett
Subject: SDG&E Golden Pacific Powerlink Project

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Betsy,
Please share the attached letter from the Redhawk Community Association Board

President with the City Council members.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Thank you.

All the best,
John Ellett, CMCA
Agent for Association
Direct line: (951) 699-2918, ext. 2103
Fax: (951) 699-0522
Website: www.AvalonWeb.com
Please let us know how we are doing: Survey

To find trusted local vendors — landscapers, handymen, and more click: Find a Pro

Planning on make an improvement to your home? Watch our ARC Video

Did you get a letter or need to report a problem about home maintenance? Watch our CRC Video 43529 Ridge Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
The electronic mail and the materials enclosed herein are private and confidential property of the sender intended solely for the receipt, use, benefit and information of the intended recipient indicated in the email address above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or any other action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited, and may result in legal liability on your part. If you are the intended recipient and you wish to not receive correspondence via email, please call 951-244- 0048.

Fair Debt Collection Practices Disclosures

If this communication is regarding your assessment account or other debt, please be advised that Avalon Management may be considered a debt collector and any information we receive in any and all communications will be used for the purpose of collecting a debt.

Unless you contact this office within thirty days of the date that you receive this communication, we will assume that the debt is valid. If you notify us in writing within that thirty-day period that you dispute the debt, or any portion thereof, we will obtain verification of the debt and will mail the same to you. If we receive such written notification from you, all efforts to collect this debt will cease until verification is made. The HOMEOWNERS

ASSOCIATION is the original creditor for this debt. Upon receipt of a written request from you within thirty days, we will provide you with the Association's address.

The state Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act require that, except under unusual circumstances, collectors may not contact you before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. They may not harass you by using threats of violence or arrest or by using obscene language. Collectors may not use false or misleading statements or call you at work if they know or have reason to know that you may not receive personal calls at work. For the most part, collectors may not tell another person, other than your attorney or spouse, about your debt.

Collectors may contact another person to confirm your location or enforce a judgment. For more information about debt collection activities, you may contact the Federal Trade Commission at 1-877-FTC-HELP or www.ftc.gov .

Redhawk Community Association

43529 Ridge Park Drive, Temecula, CA. 92590 ● (951) 699-2918 www.RehawkCommunity.com ● Email: [email protected]

May 22, 2026

Mayor Alexander and Members of the Temecula City Council,

On behalf of the Redhawk Community Association Board of Directors, we respectfully submit this letter expressing our opposition to the proposed SDG&E Golden Pacific Powerlink Project and the potential installation of 500-kilovolt transmission lines and tower structures through portions of Temecula near the Redhawk community.

Redhawk is one of the largest master-planned communities in the City of Temecula, consisting of approximately 3,256 homes and representing a significant number of Temecula residents.

The Board has received concerns from homeowners regarding the potential impacts this project may have on the community and surrounding areas.

The Board’s opposition is based on several important concerns, including:

• Substantial negative impacts on residential property values • Significant aesthetic and visual impacts to the community and surrounding open space areas • Direct environmental impacts and disruption to natural landscapes • Ongoing homeowner concerns regarding possible long-term health impacts associated with large-scale overhead transmission lines

The Redhawk Community Association Board respectfully urges the City Council to strongly advocate for alternative solutions and routes that avoid established residential communities.

We also encourage the City to petition SDG&E and all related agencies and entities involved in this project to seriously evaluate undergrounding portions of the transmission lines as a more appropriate long-term solution.

While undergrounding infrastructure may involve higher upfront costs and a longer return on investment timeline, the long-term benefits to the community, environment, aesthetics, and property preservation should be given substantial consideration. Additionally, the return on investment would still ultimately occur over time while helping to preserve the quality of life that Temecula residents value.

The Redhawk Community Association appreciates the City Council’s attention to this important matter and respectfully requests that the City continue to advocate on behalf of Temecula residents as discussions regarding this project move forward.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Don R. Snyder
President
Redhawk Community Association

cc: Pechanga Tribal Council, Pechanga Band of Indians
Docusign Envelope ID: 35704B01-E2BF-89D1-812B-DCCAC4273620

From: Jeannette Noceda
Subject: Powerlines

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Temecula City Council,
As a concerned resident, I respectfully urge the City of Temecula to adopt strong local protections regarding any proposed 500 kV transmission corridor involving approximately 200-foot industrial power line towers near our neighborhoods, schools, and protected open spaces.

Specifically, I urge the City to pursue the following protections:
• Minimum 1,500-foot setbacks from existing residential neighborhoods, including Morgan Hill, Redhawk, Temecula Creek communities, and adjacent residential developments.
• Minimum 2,000-foot setbacks from schools, youth facilities, parks, and athletic fields, including Vail Ranch Middle School.
• Minimum 2,500-foot setbacks from ecological preserves, riparian corridors, and scenic open-space resources, including the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve and Temecula Creek corridor.
• Formal recognition that 200-foot industrial transmission towers are incompatible with established residential neighborhoods, scenic gateways, preserve areas, and wildfire- prone evacuation corridors.
• Mandatory analysis of wildfire ignition risk, emergency evacuation impacts, aerial firefighting interference, and cumulative environmental impacts.

• Formal City advocacy for undergrounding alternatives wherever technically feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

Thank you for your consideration and continued commitment to protecting the residents and character of Temecula.

Sincerely,
Jeannette Noceda
Temecula, CA. 92592
(
Temecula Resident

From:Ann Mays
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Power lines on 79 South
Date:Friday, May 22, 2026 3:17:16 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Stop the Golden Pacific Power Lines from going up in Temecula. Big & ugly pwer line going up on Hwy 79 South. Awful, right around schools, churches, housing developments, shopping! Please don't all I w this to happen in our beautiful Temecula! Awful, awful, awful!

From: MIMI CHANG ; Jessica Alexander
; Brenden Kalfus ; James
Stewart ; Matt Rahn
Cc: Council Assistant ; Council Comments
; Randi Johl
Subject: Public Comment Opposing Proposed Power Line Project

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the City Clerk and Members of the Temecula City Council, Please include this email in the public record regarding the proposed power line project currently under consideration.

• Formal recognition that 200-foot industrial transmission towers are incompatible with established residential neighborhoods, scenic gateways, preserve areas, and wildfire-prone evacuation corridors. • Mandatory analysis of wildfire ignition risk, emergency evacuation impacts, aerial firefighting interference, and cumulative environmental impacts.
• Formal City advocacy for undergrounding alternatives wherever technically feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

Thank you for your consideration and continued commitment to protecting the residents and character of Temecula.

Sincerely,
Mimi Chang
Temecula Resident

From: Aaron Adams
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2026 10:51 AM
To: MELANIE NIEMAN;Jessica Alexander
Cc: Randi Johl
Subject: RE: Golden Pacific Powerlink letter regarding my property Good morning Melanie,good to hear from you.

Clerk will apply this to record.

Regards,
Aaron Adams
City Manager
City of Temecula
(951)694-6419
aaron.adamsTemeculaCA.gov
TemeculaCA.gov
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

From: MELANIE NIEMAN
Cc:Aaron Adams ; Randi Johl
Subject: Golden Pacific Powerlink letter regarding my property CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning,
I just wanted to let you know I received the attached letter from SDG&E which is highly concerning to me. My backyard overlooks Temecula Creek. I plan to attend the city council meeting on Tuesday.

If you would like to reach out to me, please contact me via text/cell I plan to be very active in opposing this project and would appreciate any opportunities to work with key stakeholders.

Thank you,
Melanie Nieman

1 *SOON 4

0..1..4.rr,...,......w+ew.+w rmwa.ae
.*.i0. swr www..wraw w./.. .wrwwan.w
+a w...a.: ....:.....�...rr..r.+ao..wr
r....r.......r.u..s..<.+a.err....r..wc•.......«
ww..•...................w.4.0.11ftow.
...Vs.v......... �.

Y.`��r.MMAM,0101 W.a1.....M...Tr Moo..MMa.v
.w.. Yf.Yb�.a..l.4"4/.•.....l.1..eq M.Yl.MyeY

6..•...111...lwe '
ten;
go toOt
IOW Wi0.1.
aM.v1...........a.oIOW,
..r.wa,..u..rrenwa.
ct 42 e w
.s«w.w..._........... !
t
i
i
Sent from my iPhone
2 From:Audrey Ammons
To:Randi Johl; Council Comments; All City Clerk
Cc:Audrey Ammons
Subject:SDG&E Golden Pacific Powerlink Project Council Meeting Comment Date:Friday, May 22, 2026 10:45:10 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Ms. Johl,
Please add the following comments to the City Council Meeting on May 26th regarding the SDG&E Golden Pacific Powerlink Project.

I have recently been made aware of plans for SDG&E to steamroll their Golden Pacific Powerlink project through Temecula Wine Country and Temecula Creek. This project will irreversibly change the character of Temecula and destroy the natural beauty that makes this city special. The Temecula Creek corridor is filled with wildlife, trails, and open spaces. Many neighborhoods such as my own of Morgan Hill and TVUSD Vail Ranch middle school, where my children will attend in several years, run relatively parallel to the creek. For SDG&E to quietly plan this project through the middle of a bedroom community that will disrupt and destroy the area is shocking.

On May 16th I viewed a video Temecula City Councilmen Zak Schwank shared where he visited a 500kV electrical tower in Perris, CA. I was stunned by the enormity of the right-of-way, staggering height of the structures, and the buzzing sound the wires were generating. I am also very concerned our home owners insurance will use these electrical towers as an easy excuse to drop our coverage citing an increased fire risk. To add insult to injury, the electricity generated from this project will not provide any power to the City of Temecula itself! We are served by Southern California Edison not SDG&E.

I strongly oppose this project and am requesting the City of Temecula's help to stop SDG&E from routing this portion of the Golden Pacific Powerlink route through the heart of Temecula now!
Audrey Sato

From: Lynn Lambrecht <
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2026 9:53 AM
To: Randi Johl
Subject: Public Comment for Golden Pacific Powerlink Project CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Randi,
I'm unable to attend the City Council Meeting at 3 pm on May 26th due to a prior commitment. I would like my comments included, if possible.

As a certified woman business owner approved by the CPUC Supplier Clearinghouse, I wrote them after the May 12th meeting. See below.

As a resident and property owner in Temecula, CA for the past 20+years, I am writing today to express concern about routing 500 k-V transmission lines through Temecula for this project.

I recognize the need for increased electrical output in our state. I have numerous concerns, as I live off Temecula Parkway(Highway 79).

As Golden Pacific is proceeding with seeking approvals, I appreciate you reading my concerns, as I listen to the webinar hosted by Golden Pacific tonight.

They are vague, and it sounds like they have talking points for our questions tonight. Coming from the aviation industry, I understand the "press kit"format of webinars,yet as a concerned citizen,this is not comforting.

As SDG&E and SCE do not work together formally, have you assessed the risks for us in the Riverside County SCE service area for the Orange County SDG&E residents and how will conflicts be addressed? Risks such as Rights-of-way and easement conflicts: Legal disputes over access, usage rights, and compensation can delay or stop construction.

Regulatory and jurisdictional issues: Conflicting permits or approvals from local governments, county planners, or the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) can create compliance risk.

Interference with existing infrastructure: New towers can physically interfere with poles, lines, substations, fiber, or distribution equipment owned by the other utility, raising safety and reliability concerns.

Safety hazards: Proximity to live conductors increases risks of accidental contact, electromagnetic effects, or induced voltages during construction and operation. 1 Service reliability impacts: Construction or new equipment could require temporary outages, increase vegetation-management complexity, or raise outage risk from wind/faults.

Liability and insurance exposure: Disputes over responsibility for damage, maintenance, or third-party claims can increase insurance costs and legal exposure.

Environmental and community opposition: Local residents, tribes, or environmental groups may oppose visual, noise, or habitat impacts, triggering delays or mitigation orders. Specifically, how will you assess the environmental impact for our Pechanga tribal lands? For our Temecula Creek, wetlands,tourism impact on wine country+?
Coordination and operations complexity: Day-to-day operations (maintenance schedules, emergency response) become more complex without clear coordination agreements.

How are CalFire, Riverside County Fire, Pechanga Fire, and our Emergency Safety and Response team in Temecula included in this planning?We are dependent on Interstate 15 for evacuation, and this project runs parallel to and through Interstate 15. Wildfire risk assessment is a critical concern, especially as I was evacuated last summer near Temecula Creek.

Cost allocation and compensation disputes:Who pays for relocations, reinforcement, or mitigation— ratepayers, the proposing utility, or the host utility? Technical compatibility and electromagnetic interference (EMI): New towers or equipment might introduce EMI or grounding issues that affect communications, SCADA, personal health, or protection systems. How will interruptions be handled for we property owners? Health and safety risks for our residents is a major concern. EMF for these high-power emitting transmission lines/poles.

Has the cost of wildfires been taken into consideration in conjunction with underground lines vs. 500 k-V transmission lines/poles? Have you measured the costs of underground lines and/or solar costs vs. above-ground towers with wildfire risk costs (Paradise, Eaton, Palisades have taught us so much, are we assessing with this in mind)l* I am a proactive planner- let's please consider this? Why cut through Temecula when the need is in Imperial, San Diego, and Orange Counties? How will you compensate for Insurance cost increases for property owners and the potential decline in property values for property owners?We have maximum height requirements for buildings in Temecula; 20-25 ft poles do not meet these standards.

Will you all come to meet with the Temecula residents to review this proposal? How will the decision be made for the final review process?
Thank you for listening-this webinar is making this process real, and my concerns are growing.

Respectfully, Lynn
- Lynn Lambrecht
2 Contingency Planning Advisory Services
Founder The Living Planner®
https://thelivingplanner.com
Email: [email protected]
Ph:
911T Oa
*CPUC Geoet°`
Author of The Living Planner What to Prepare Now While You Are Living https://www.e-junkie.com/i/u8ac
Linked In profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lynnlambrecht #Can'tPredictCanPrepare#CareForPeopleCareForBusiness
3 From:Robert Gyori
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Power Link
Date:Friday, May 22, 2026 9:19:32 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear City Council Meeting

I strongly opposed to the high voltage power line lead across Temecula.

Sincerely

M. Gy.

From:Tinou Roncone
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Powerlink OPPOSITION
Date:Friday, May 22, 2026 8:32:10 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Mayor and all City Council Members:

I am unable to attend the 5/26/26 session due to work. However, I would like to vehemently OPPOSE this Powerlink map through Temecula. SDGE doesn’t even supply power to us so why do we have to tolerate their lines coming right through Temecula? It’s ridiculous!

I attended one of their virtual sessions and I asked the question why they can’t bury the lines underground and they replied that it was due to cost. I know that it may be easier to due it above ground, but can’t they consider doing part of it underground in the densely populated areas?

We are already in a fire zone so this definitely does not help things, especially since so many insurance companies are no longer insuring CA homes. Is SDGE going subsidize us for that?

Lastly, and most importantly, why aren’t they going through Highway 76 and up the 5? If they want to follow a highway, then Highway 76 should be their route, NOT the 79. Highway 76 is San Diego County where SDGE supplies their electricity so that makes the most sense to their OWN customers.

Or isn’t another option is to go between Fallbrook and Pechanga? There’s a lot of rural land there.

You CANNOT let this happen. Doesn’t the city have lawyers for this type of stuff? Please advise.

Thank you for your attention,
Tinou Roncone

From:Laura Prince
To:Randi Johl
Cc:Council Comments
Subject:Public comment for May 26 city council meeting on PowerLink Project Date:Thursday, May 21, 2026 11:47:26 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

As a resident and home owner of this community, I am deeply concerned about the long-term impacts these industrial-scale 500 kV towers would have on public safety, wildfire risk, environmental resources, scenic landscapes, and quality of life. Towers approaching 200 feet in height are completely incompatible with the residential character of Temecula and surrounding communities like Morgan Hill, Redhawk, and Temecula Creek.

In addition to their visual impact, high-voltage transmission lines can generate constant humming and crackling noise, especially during damp or foggy conditions. Residents should not be subjected to ongoing industrial noise pollution near their homes, schools, parks, and outdoor recreation areas.

I am also concerned about the potential human health impacts associated with prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) generated by 500 kV transmission infrastructure.

While research on long-term exposure continues, many residents do not want industrial-scale high-voltage facilities placed close to homes, schools, and areas where children and families spend time. At a minimum, these concerns deserve serious study, transparency, and precautionary setbacks.

This region already faces serious wildfire danger and evacuation challenges. Adding major transmission infrastructure near densely populated neighborhoods and limited evacuation corridors raises significant safety concerns, including fire ignition risk, evacuation bottlenecks, tower failure scenarios, and interference with emergency response and aerial firefighting operations.

I am also concerned about impacts to local schools, parks, trails, wildlife habitat, and the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve corridor. These areas should be protected, not industrialized.

I urge decision-makers to require full environmental review, comprehensive wildfire and evacuation analysis, independent health and noise studies, and serious evaluation of undergrounding alternatives wherever feasible near residential communities and sensitive habitat areas.

Our community deserves thoughtful planning, transparency, and meaningful protections. I respectfully ask that this project be opposed, rerouted, or significantly modified to prevent industrial-scale transmission towers from being placed near homes, schools, and protected open spaces in Southwest Riverside County.

Sincerely,
Laura Prince

From:Sandi Schwartz
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Golden Pacific Powerlink Project through Temecula Date:Thursday, May 21, 2026 11:44:07 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Sir,
I write this to you as a Temecula resident since 2004, as an educator since 1968, as a mother and grandmother (whose children and grandchildren live in Temecula), I cannot attend the meeting next week due to family commitments and so I am expressing my concerns to you via this e mail.

I am concerned about the project’s potential impacts on our community, environment, quality of life, health concerns, impact on schools and overall value of living and investing in our beauty valley.

We have gone through similar trauma when Liberty Quarry pitched their intension to turn a sacred mountain into a dust bowl as they insisted it would not impact the health and lives of our community.

It is terrifying to think of the wild fire danger that these power lines add to the already dry brush and high winds that increase with intensity with each year that my family is living here.

My concern is that SDG&E will make promises that they cannot keep.

My concern is that BIG MONEY brings huge pressure on the people who make the final decision whether or not to permit this invasion.

My concern is that cost is what is stopping this company from laying underground utilities when that is what must be done to ensure the health, safety and well being of this area.

Please, Please….speak up for us.

Please, Please….do everything you can in our city and county government to stop this momentum.

THANK YOU SO MUCH,
Sandi Schwartz

Temecula, Ca. 92592

From:Lisa Rutherford
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SDG&E Proposed Power-Lines
Date:Thursday, May 21, 2026 10:37:00 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern,

I have been a resident of Temecula for seven years. I own a condominium along the Temecula Creek. The thought of SDG&E building a high-voltage power line through Temecula is very disturbing!
I came to Temecula because of the beauty in this valley. How well this community has been planned out. To have it all ruined by high-voltage power lines is unacceptable!
SDG&E's proposed structure will run right through the riverbed alongside my condominium community. It will be so unsightly and dangerous. To begin with, we had a fire in the riverbed last summer right along the south end of our community.

What kind of danger will the power lines pose? Right now, because of fire danger, it’s hard to find insurance coverage. Our property value will go down. Not to mention how ugly it will be. It also poses a health hazard.

Why doesn’t SDG&E go through their county? If SDG&E plans to go through Temecula, it should all be underground. We all know that would be too costly, and it’s all about the money.

I am totally against this project!

Lisa Rutherford

Temecula, CA

From:Jeff Welty
To:Randi Johl
Subject:No power lines
Date:Thursday, May 21, 2026 10:21:09 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please vote no!
Jeff Welty

From:Bill Harden
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Power link discussion
Date:Thursday, May 21, 2026 8:18:51 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern:

I am unable to attend this meeting but strongly oppose this addition to the power distribution project thru Temecula.

It represents a safety concern to those living close to the project as well as an eye sore to the city of temecula.

Property values will fall in the areas around the project and it is my understanding that there is no benefit to the community from this project..

Respectfully submitted,
William Harden
Morgan Hill property owner

From:Kathleen Papadopoulos
To:Randi Johl
Subject:SDGE Concerns
Date:Thursday, May 21, 2026 7:31:08 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Kathleen and I’m a Temecula resident since 1999. I have raised my family here as well as taught in the TVUSD for over 2 decades. I’m an invested property owner and I’m deeply concerned about this project. I oppose moving forward with this project for the following reasons: property deprecation and property devaluations as well as environmental impacts, noise pollution, electromagnetic waves, and the transformers ruin the natural landscape.

It is my hope that the City Council of Temecula will hear our voices and SDGE will terminate any further action with the proposed electric power transmission lines.

Thank you for your support,
Kathleen Papadopoulos
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

From:Mark Brudney
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Public Comment Regarding Proposed PowerLink Transmission Project Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 7:21:23 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula City Council and City Clerk,
My name is Mark Brudney, and I am a resident of Temecula writing to express my opposition to the proposed SDG&E PowerLink transmission project through our community.

I am deeply concerned about the potential impact this project could have on Temecula neighborhoods, scenic landscapes, wildlife, wildfire safety, and the overall quality of life for residents. Temecula is a community that families choose because of its beauty, open spaces, and strong sense of community, and I believe this project could permanently change the character of our city.

I respectfully ask the City Council to carefully consider the concerns being raised by residents and to advocate for alternatives that would better protect our community and environment. Many residents, including myself, feel that the risks and long-term impacts of this project outweigh the proposed benefits.

Thank you for taking the time to hear and consider the voices of Temecula residents. I appreciate your service to our community and your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,
Mark Brudney
Temecula Resident

From:AACCENTDESIGN1
To:[email protected]; Jessica Alexander; Brenden Kalfus; Matt Rahn; James Stewart; Randi Johl Cc:AACCENTDESIGN1
Subject:NO-NO-NO to SDG&E"s high voltage power lines GOING THROUGH TEMECULA CREEK! Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 6:33:02 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

TO: [email protected] District 5
[email protected] District 2
[email protected] District 3
[email protected] District 1
[email protected] District 4
[email protected] City Clerk
The City Council meets the second and fourth Tuesday of everymonth at 3:00p.m. in the Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street,Temecula.

NO-NO-NO to SDG&E's high voltage power linesGOING THROUGH TEMECULA CREEK! https://patch.com/california/temecula/new-opposition-proposed-sdg-e-powerlink-transmission-line-tourism-wineries Temecula City Councilman Schwank needs to do anotherVIDEO under the 500 kv Power Lines ...this time walking witha florescent tube light bulb...and WATCH IT LIGHT UP as hegets close to the towers (AND SHOW IT AT THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING)

"The phenomenon of a fluorescent tube glowing when held nearhigh-voltage transmission lines, such as those operating at 500 kV,is a demonstration of electromagnetic induction and gas ionization.

These transmission lines generate intense electric and magneticfields in the space surrounding them. When a fluorescent bulb isbrought into this proximity, it acts as a receiver for the energy present inthese fields. " https://www.farmanddairy.com/news/top-stories/how-to-make-a-fluorescent-bulb-glow-under-transmission-power-lines/623730.html

A.I. information below:

The question of whether high-voltage power lines, such as thoseoperating at 500 kV, pose significant health risks—specificallyregarding cancer—has been a subject of intense scientific scrutinyfor several decades.

Epidemiological studies, most notably those investigating childhoodleukemia, have reported statistical associations with proximity to high-voltage lines.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifiedELF magnetic fields emitted from high-voltage lines as "possiblycarcinogenic to humans" (Group 2B) in 2001 and while not "proven" tocause cancer; it NEVERTHELESS indicates that a causalassociation is considered "credible."

Repectfully submitted, Concerned Citizens of California don'tthink "voters" want even a little bit of "causal association"OF GETTING CANCER from new projects approved by citycouncils!!!

From:Irma Manzanares
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Powerlines
Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 5:42:03 PM
Importance:High
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
We stand AGAINST the proposed power lines running through our beautiful city of Temecula CA. Not only will it be an eye soar , health issue, it would devalue home values . Temecula is a family-oriented city with great schools for our kids and a great community with great views. We have lived in the area 20 + years and would hate to see power lines which would be to close to where we live. We moved to Temecula because everything that it offered. If this passes families will no longer want to live in Temecula and no one will want to purchase a home here. Please do everything you can to stop this from happening . Thank you.

Respectfully,
Manzanares family

From:Bryson Bickler
Subject:Opposing Golden Pacific Powerlink
Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 3:34:40 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink route through Temecula Creek.

This project would bring massive high-voltage transmission towers through Temecula Creek, residential neighborhoods, and wine country areas that define our community. The scale of this project is completely out of character with Temecula and would permanently damage the environment, scenic views, local businesses, and nearby property values.

Temecula Creek and the Santa Margarita River corridor are sensitive natural areas that support wildlife habitat and protected species, including the arroyo toad, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and Quino checkerspot butterfly. Construction of large transmission towers, access roads, grading, and vegetation clearing would disrupt these habitats and permanently alter the creek corridor.

This proposal also raises major wildfire concerns. Temecula already faces enough fire danger every year. Running large overhead transmission lines through high fire risk areas near homes, schools, and evacuation routes is irresponsible and creates additional risk for residents safety.

The impact on homeowners and local businesses would be massively significant. Families moved here because of Temecula’s open space, rural character, and natural beauty. Wine country is one of the main reasons people visit Temecula and supports a major part of our local economy. Industrial transmission towers cutting through vineyards, hillsides, and neighborhoods would hurt tourism, reduce property values, and change the character of the area permanently!
What is most frustrating is that this route appears to target Temecula simply because it is convenient, while local residents are expected to absorb all of the consequences. There are other possible routes through less populated and already developed utility corridors that would avoid sensitive environmental areas and established communities.

Temecula should not be treated as a shortcut for a regional transmission project. We will stand against this.

I urge the CPUC and SDG&E to reject the proposed Temecula route entirely and pursue alternatives that do not place the burden on local homeowners, wildlife habitat, and wine country, and don't land your proposed project in court for decades to come.

Please include this letter in the official public record for the Golden Pacific Powerlink project.

Sincerely,
Bryson & Lisa Bickler

From:Joel Carden
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Power Towers
Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 12:50:39 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

As a Temecula resident, I strongly oppose the projected power lines going thru our neighborhoods. Your help in opposing these is greatly appreciated.

Sent from my iPhone

From:Trish Pole
To:Randi Johl
Subject:I AM OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 12:38:27 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

MYSELF AND MY FAMILY OPPOSE THE HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION

CORRIDOR
Patricia Pole
Ronald Pole

Temecula, CA 92592

From:Melanie Roth-Smith
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Proposed Powerlink
Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 11:14:43 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
I am writing as a concerned Temecula resident in regards to the Golden Pacific Powerlink project, which would impact thousands of residents. Many homeowners and families are deeply concerned about the project's potential consequences, including reducing property values, increasing fire risk, increasing homeowners' insurance costs and possible long-term health risks associated with nearby high-voltage transmission infrastructure. In addition, residents are worried about the overall impact on rural communities, open space and quality of life. This project would have a terrible impact on our lovely community. I urge you to share my concerns with SDG&E representatives at the upcoming city meeting. Thank you for your time and consideration.
--
Cheers,
Melanie Roth-Smith
And now that you don't have to be perfect, you can be good. -John Steinbeck

From:Janie Elsey
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Power Lines
Date:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 10:59:43 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I don’t want them!!!!!!
Sent from my iPhone

From:Juliana Encinas
To:[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Council Comments; [email protected]
Subject:OPPOSED: SDG&E Golden Pacific PowerLink
Date:Monday, May 18, 2026 11:20:13 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
I am a resident of Temecula California 92592 and I strongly oppose the proposed SDG&E “Golden Pacific PowerLink” project.

I expect our representatives to voice our community’s concern, loudly, and reject this proposal.

My Concerns:

This will impact residents tremendously and should be voted on by residents.

The risks have not been properly vetted and resolutions have not been shared with the public.

These are not standard power lines. High voltage power lines have proven to increase cancer rates for those who live nearby and children who go to school nearby. Risks include harm and even death. If it cannot be proven this is 100% inaccurate, we should not take on the risk.

Major fire risk. SDG&E is unreliable and irresponsible. This would require constant vegetation management which historically, SDG&E has not maintained, and even if they did, would harm wildlife habitats. Temecula has high fire risk.

Long-term impact to wildlife and local nature that Temecula prides itself on.

Constant noise and visual disruption to our beautiful city.

Increased utility strain in a hot climate.

There was a webinar that did not disclose any benefits for the residents of Temecula. With all of the risks, why would we ever consider approving such a project? Best,
Juliana Encinas

From:Jim Schloss
To:Council Assistant; Jessica Alexander
Cc:Randi Johl
Subject:CONSTITUENT OPPOSITION: Golden Pacific Powerlink - Redhawk Resident Date:Sunday, May 17, 2026 12:53:10 PM
Attachments:SDGE_Power_Link_Opposition_J_Schloss.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honorable Mayor Jessica Alexander and Members of the Temecula City Council, Please find attached my opposition letter to SDG&E's proposed Golden Pacific Power Link.

This industrial structure, if built, will cause irreparable damage to our beautiful Temecula community. Please let me know how I can aid any effort to fight against the Power Link.

Sorry for resending this email, I had the incorrect general email address for the city council.

Best Regards,
Jim Schloss

Temecula CA 92592

(

5-17-2026

To: The Honorable Mayor Jessica Alexander and Members of the Temecula City Council

From: Jim Schloss

Temecula CA 92592

Regarding: Opposition to SDG&E Golden Pacific Power Link

As a nine-year resident of the Vintage neighborhood in Redhawk, I am writing to voice my strong opposition to the proposed Temecula Creek path for the Golden Pacific Powerlink. This project forces our community to absorb severe visual blight, unacceptable public safety risks, and catastrophic local financial damage. Furthermore, the environmental destruction this line will inflict along its entire route, specifically through the heart of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, is completely unacceptable when superior routing alternatives exist. Of the four routing options available for the new Powerlink, SDG&E is pushing the above-ground Temecula path to protect its own profit margins with the lowest construction cost. A route utilizing the existing Sunrise Powerlink corridor is the objectively better choice, providing a superior balance of cost, safety, and tribal and environmental protections.

In addition to the impact to Temecula of the current route, I object to the driving force behind SDG&E’s Power Link project. Despite marketing the Powerlink as 'green power for all,' SDG&E’s true objective is expanding grid capacity to support the explosive growth of regional AI data centers.

Extreme Visual Blight

SDG&E’s Golden Pacific Powerlink will feature massive steel towers ranging from 125 to 191 feet tall, spaced roughly every 1,400 feet. At their maximum height, these structures rival a 19-story building—making them the tallest man-made objects in the city. To put this in perspective, they will stand six stories taller than the Pechanga resort tower and loom four times higher than the Temecula Valley Hospital. This eight-mile wall of 30 industrial steel lattice structures will become the most visually dominant feature in the region, completely overwhelming the natural beauty of the Temecula Valley.

The City of Temecula has a strict municipal ordinance prohibiting new overhead power lines, but state regulatory overrule will force us to ignore our own local laws unless we fight back. This unacceptable visual blight will permanently scar our landscape, severely damaging Temecula’s hard-earned reputation as a premier winery, tourism, and high-quality-of-life destination.

Increased Wildfire Risk

From a wildfire risk perspective, the Golden Pacific Power link is a dangerous “linear ignition source" that can turn a Santa Anna wind event into a catastrophic fire storm. With the already high wildfire threat and dense urban population in Temecula , the Power Link is an unacceptable risk to lives and property.

Earthquake Risk

The proposed path for the Golden Pacific Powerlink directly spans the Wildomar strand of the Elsinore Fault Zone, cutting through a high-susceptibility liquefaction zone near Temecula Creek.

Paleoseismic studies indicate this segment produced a major earthquake of magnitud e 6.5 or greater circa 1700, meaning a severe repeat event is statistically overdue. Forcing 500-kV infrastructure into this volatile seismic corridor creates an unacceptable public safety hazard. A major earthquake could liquefy the underlying soil, collapse the massive towers, and snap high- voltage lines—instantly igniting a catastrophic wildfire. This cascading disaster would bottleneck critical evacuation corridors, trapping residents south of Highway 79 and cutting off vital access to the Temecula Valley Hospital.

Home Insurance, Property Values, and Total Economic Damage

As a resident of the Redhawk community in Temecula, I can report that getting new home insurance is very difficult and close to impossible because of the current wildfire risk in this part of Temecula. Between the heightened wildfire risk introduced by the Powerlink and the mandatory disclosures SDG&E must file detailing that threat, homes in south Temecula will effectively become uninsurable. The added wildfire risk, lack of home insurance, and extreme visual blight will crash home values in the impacted and nearby areas. For the city of Temecula this will have a devastating impact on the property tax base

Using an AI tool, I did a model of the total financial damage that will be caused by SDG&E’s Power Link to Temecula. A realistic estimate of the total financial damage to Temecula is:

The proposed Golden Pacific Powerlink corridor is projected to inflict an estimated $1.125 billion in cumulative economic damage on the Temecula Valley over a ten -year horizon. This structural loss is driven primarily by a severe $550 million contraction i n Wine Country tourism, paired with a combined $495 million hit from wiped-out residential equity and surging wildfire insurance premiums. Ultimately, the current proposal forces local homeowners, businesses, and municipal funds to absorb massive financial liabilities to subsidize coastal energy delivery.

Comparison of the SDG&E Proposed and Alternate Routes

The path through the city of Temecula is one of at least four potential paths for the Golden Pacific Power Line. Within Temecula the power line can be elevated on 150ft+ towers as currently proposed or buried underground. The table below shows my ranking of some of the possible route options:

Rank Route Name Anza
Borrego
Impact
Tribes
Impacted
Public
Safety
Risk
Visual
Blight
Environment
Impact
Estimated
Cost
1 Sunrise Powerlink Parallel no Kumeyaay Moderate Low Moderate $3.1B 2 Southern Bypass yes Pala
Pauma
Rincon
San Pasqual
Low Moderate High $2.6B
3 Northern Arc no Cahuilla
Morongo
Soboba
Low Low High $3.8B
4 SDGE Proposed
(Temecula Buried)
yes Pechanga
Kumeyaay
Moderate Moderate High $4.5B
5 SDGE Proposed
(Temecula with Towers)
yes Pechanga
Kumeyaay
Extreme Extreme High $2.3B

1) Path for the Sunrise Powerlink Parallel:

Starts at El Centro (Imperial Valley Substation), runs straight west along the Mexican border (bypassing Anza-Borrego to the south), passes through Jacumba, Boulevard, and Campo, reaches Alpine (Suncrest Substation), pivots sharp north through the Ramona/S anta Ysabel backcountry, turns west across Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, and terminates at the Talega Substation hub next to San Onofre.

2) Path for the Southern Bypass:

Starts at El Centro (Imperial Valley Substation), cuts northwest across the central and southern sections of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, exits near Warner Springs, heads southwest along the Highway 76 corridor through Pala and Pauma Valley, tracks west across the rural hills of Valley Center, enters the eastern boundary of Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, and follows the existing utility corridor west to terminate at the Talega Substation next to San Onofre.

3) Path for the Northern Arc

Starts at El Centro (Imperial Valley Substation), runs north along the eastern side of the Salton Sea, climbs northwest into the Coachella Valley past Palm Springs, loops west through the

Banning Pass utility slot near Beaumont, tracks southwest along the San Jacinto foothills toward Hemet, cuts west through Winchester, follows the SR-91/Santa Ana River Canyon corridor, and terminates at the Serrano Substation in Chino Hills / Orange County.

When you look at balancing construction cost, no new impact on tribes, no damage to Anza Borrego, no new visual blight, and no extreme fire risk to dense residential areas, having the Golden Pacific Power Line run parallel to the existing Sunrise Power Link and then continue on to San Onofre is the best option.

SDG&E’s motivation for the Golden Pacific Power Link is Not Green Power for Everyone

Densely developed coastal metro areas like San Diego and Orange County are geographically constrained, leading utilities to treat inland regions as expendable zones for heavy industrial infrastructure. Despite SDG&E’s marketing narrative, the Golden Pacific Powerlink is not being built to provide "clean energy for the general public." Over the next decade, San Diego County's population growth is projected at a nominal 5%, while Orange County flatlines at 0%. Driven by astronomical coastal housing costs, outward migration is actively shifting population toward Riverside County and also out of California. Paired with a well-documented stagnation in electric vehicle sales over the last few years, the public demand simply does not justify a massive 2 GW power line from the Imperial Valley.

The true driver for SDG&E’s Power Link is the tech sector. In California alone, AI data centers are projected to consume an additional 5 GW of power over the next five years. SDG&E is selling a myth that everyday citizens need this grid expansion for their electric cars and new neighbors.

In reality, SDG&E’s Power Link is just a subsidized corporate utility line meant to run massive, power-hungry AI data centers for tech giants like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft.

There is no reason this infrastructure belongs in our backyards. These massive computer facilities can and should be built out in the Imperial Valley, right next to the power plants that generate the electricity. The tech sector makes excuses about data latency and desert heat, but those arguments don't hold up. The data latency is not an issue for >99% of the applications and there are practical cooling solutions that work in the Imperial Valley. Putting data centers right next to the power source is the only common-sense, affordable solution for California’s power grid.

Please help support this fight for the future of Temecula,

Jim Schloss

Temecula CA 92592

From:

To:Council Comments
Subject:You are our representatives...WE need your help~! Date:Saturday, May 16, 2026 10:55:35 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Many residents are asking why enormous 500 kV transmission towers are being proposed near scenic residential neighborhoods in Temecula instead of being kept in remote desert, industrial, or sparsely populated areas where major transmission corridors have historically been placed. Across California, massive high-voltage transmission lines are more commonly seen running through areas like Hesperia, Victorville, desert regions, industrial corridors, agricultural land, and lower-density communities — not directly beside scenic suburban neighborhoods filled with beautiful homes, parks, trails, equestrian communities, and protected open space.

Temecula is known for its natural beauty, rolling hills, wineries, trails, wildlife habitat, peaceful neighborhoods, and stunning canyon and hillside views. Families invested their lives into these communities because of the scenery, quality of life, and open landscapes that make Temecula unique. Residents are deeply concerned that placing industrial-scale steel transmission towers near homes and communities could permanently damage the character, beauty, and property values of these neighborhoods. Many people also believe Temecula is a strong and politically engaged community with a powerful public voice, and residents are making it clear that they do not want Temecula transformed into an industrial utility corridor. The concern is not just about power lines — it is about protecting the identity, beauty, and future of Temecula before irreversible changes are made to the landscape and surrounding communities.

Mary Ann Mari CTC, VTA, ECCS, LCS, MDS
TerraMar Travel, Inc. & Property Management

Temecula, CA 92592 - 3441
(951) 308-9156 office
(
http://www.DevonshireDownsMHP.com/
http://www.ThunderbirdMHP.com/
http://www.MyOceanViews.com/ http://www.TerramarTravel.com/ http://www.MyTravelGroups.com
CST 2053942-40
FL ST #36618

Virus-free. www.avg.com

From:Lori Petersen
To:Council Comments
Subject:Objection "Golden Pacific Powerlink" Temecula
Date:Friday, May 15, 2026 3:41:34 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear [email protected]
I am writing to formally express my strong opposition to SDG&E's proposed "Golden Pacific Powerlink" project, specifically the route intended to pass through Temecula Creek.

The community of Temecula should not be burdened with infrastructure that serves other regions while leaving local residents to manage significant long-term consequences. My primary concerns regarding this project include:
- Environmental Impact: Temecula Creek supports diverse wildlife, including hawks, coyotes, and various native species. The destruction of these sensitive habitats would be irreversible. - Public Safety and Health: Introducing high-voltage infrastructure near residential areas, schools, and open spaces increases wildfire risks and raises concerns regarding long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields.
- Economic Consequences: This project threatens to decrease property values and damage local tourism, which depends on the area’s rural character. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the percentage of project costs that may fall upon taxpayers. - Visual Impact: The installation of industrial towers will permanently alter the community’s natural beauty and landscape.
- Fire Mitigation: The increased risk of wildfires poses a substantial long-term financial and safety threat to residents.

Temecula is not an appropriate route for this project. Our environment, safety, and property values must be protected. I urge you to reconsider this proposal and pursue alternative routes that do not place a disproportionate burden on our community.

Temecula is not a Sacrifice Zone!
Best regards,
Lori Petersen

From:

To:Randi Johl
Subject:Re : Zack Schwank requested feedback on Powerlink HV line debacle Date:Friday, May 15, 2026 1:11:49 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Randi,

Here are what I see as the major concerns of the proposed rout through southern Temecula (not in impact order)

1. Severe degradation to the look/feel of south Temecula thereby impacting homeowners/tourism/traffic - These 190-foot towers would dwarf existing housing destroying beautiful relaxing country vibe we now enjoy.

2. Sever hazard to the ballooning industry - any balloon blown off course into these high-tension lines would surely result in sever injury/fatalities

3. Health hazard for the many homes already built on either side of that route – While they tried to compare the exposure to that of a tv/microwave, what they failed to address is that these fields would be there 24x7 with the most sever long term effects being for people working from home, retired, or raising children net yet of school age. The rebuttal, had they allowed it during their meetings, is that no one stands in front of their microwave/tv 24x7 so you cannot dismiss health impact based on that measurement.

4. They alluded to burying the lines as ” Too expensive” and while that might be true when considering the entire run, a 6-7 mile underground section is perfectly doable and should be built in to the projected cost.

5. They indicate that the line is required to meet future demand and indicated percentages of private vs business needs. They however refused to break out exactly which businesses would be growing. They of course would have to know this in order to come up with these numbers. This leaves the impression that this in a large part is due to increasing power needs for current and proposed and existing AI datacenters and that we would all be helping to foot this bill. Due to their huge energy needs, these new projects should be forced to be self-contained with their own sources of power. As Temecula residents are not benefitting directly from these businesses, we should not be asked to pay the costs. If they have no alternative way to power these businesses, they should be responsible for paying the extra cost of undergrounding key sections of the run.

6. The section running through Temecula is in a high wind and therefore high fire area. The introduction of these lines could severely impact insurance rates and increase the likelihood of increased fires in the area. SCE has already learned by this mistake, and we were recently billed for moving key sections of existing runs underground to mitigate the fire risk. I have personally watched flames run across that entire run multiple times since I have moved here in 1992.

I will leave this at 6 but there are certainly more arguments that can be made against

their current proposal.

Please consider these talking points for your next meeting.

Sincerely,

Al Oliveira

From:

To:Council Comments; [email protected]; Council Comments; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject:(Project Golden Pacific Powerlink).

Date:Friday, May 15, 2026 8:50:22 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To whom it may concern,
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed transmission line project through Temecula and surrounding communities (Project Golden Pacific Powerlink).

SDG&E continues to justify new large-scale transmission infrastructure by claiming increasing energy demand and the need for additional capacity during peak hours. However, this argument ignores the fact that homeowners across California have already been contributing to grid resilience through rooftop solar generation — often at significant personal expense — only to see SDG&E and other utilities aggressively lobby against fair solar compensation programs.

For years, residents invested in rooftop solar systems based on the understanding that distributed energy generation benefits everyone by:
• Reducing strain on the grid during high-demand periods • Producing power near where it is consumed
• Lowering the need for costly new transmission infrastructure • Improving grid resilience during heat waves and emergencies Yet SDG&E supported policies that drastically reduced net energy metering benefits for homeowners, making rooftop solar less financially viable for families who were trying to help solve exactly the problem SDG&E now claims requires massive new transmission projects.

It is deeply frustrating to watch the utility discourage local clean energy generation while simultaneously proposing industrial-scale infrastructure (ultimately paid for by community members to help the bottom-line profits of the company) that would permanently and negatively impact communities like Temecula.

These transmission lines threaten:
• Scenic open space, natural landscapes and sacred grounds • Property values
• Wildlife habitats and migration corridors
• Community character and quality of life
• Fire safety concerns in a region already vulnerable to wildfires • General public safety and welfare due to EMF radiation emissions Temecula residents should not bear the visual, environmental, health and financial burden of infrastructure expansion while SDG&E undermines one of the most effective decentralized energy solutions available to

California homeowners. I highly doubt that any of your executives or any of the five members of the CPUC would advocate this type of solution in their neighborhood.

Instead of prioritizing expensive transmission projects, SDG&E should focus on:
• Restoring fair incentives for rooftop solar
• Expanding battery storage programs
• Investing in localized microgrids
• Supporting community-based energy resilience
• Modernizing grid management to better utilize distributed generation A truly forward-looking energy strategy would empower communities to generate and store more of their own power rather than concentrating dependence on sprawling transmission corridors and using the equivalent of elongated extension cords through residential areas and open space preserves.

I strongly urge SDG&E to reconsider this project and pursue solutions that align with community interests, environmental stewardship, and genuine clean-energy progress. The reality is you have a better solution to deliver the promise of additional power to the grid without putting communities and people at substantial risk with this ill- advised plan. Is profit and exploitation of whole communities more important than doing what is right? Concerned resident
~ Dawn DiPietro

From:Council Comments
To:Dani Vincent
Subject:RE:

Date:Thursday, May 14, 2026 12:52:00 PM
Received.

Randi Johl
Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
City of Temecula
(951) 694-6421
[email protected]
TemeculaCA.gov
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

From: Dani Vincent
Subject:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Temecula Representatives,

WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE PROPOSED TEMECULA CREEK CORRIDOR TRANSMISSION TOWERS. Projects like this could permanently change the character of Temecula and damage the natural landscape, wildlife habitat, trails, scenic views, and peaceful neighborhoods that make this community special.

NOW is the time for you and your constintuants to stand up for Temecula residents you serve and to make their voices heard before decisions are made that cannot be undone.

PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK CORRIDOR TRANSMISSION TOWERS.

Respectfully,

Danette Marlo Uddeborg
Sven Lucas Uddeborg
Emma Avalina Uddeborg
25-year residents with family and friends living among us

From:Council Comments
To:Morgan Joyce
Subject:RE: Opposition to Proposed Temecula Creek Corridor Transmission Towers Date:Thursday, May 14, 2026 12:51:00 PM
Received.

From: Morgan Joyce
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Temecula Creek Corridor Transmission Towers

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear council members,
I am writing as a concerned Temecula resident to strongly oppose the proposed transmission towers planned for the Temecula Creek Corridor.

This project would have a significant negative impact on our community, our environment, and the families who live nearby. The placement of large transmission towers through this corridor threatens local property values and would permanently alter the natural beauty that makes Temecula such a desirable place to live. Many homeowners have invested their life savings into their properties and should not be forced to absorb the financial consequences of infrastructure that diminishes the character and appeal of our neighborhoods.

In addition, the Temecula Creek Corridor serves as an important habitat and migration area for local wildlife. Construction and long-term operation of these towers would disrupt sensitive ecosystems, damage open space, and reduce the environmental integrity of the area for future generations.

There are also legitimate concerns regarding the potential health impacts associated with high-voltage transmission lines in close proximity to homes, schools, parks, and walking trails. While studies may vary, many residents are uncomfortable with increased exposure to electromagnetic fields and the uncertainty surrounding their long-term effects. Communities should not be asked to sacrifice their peace of mind

and quality of life when alternative routing options may exist.

Beyond these concerns, the towers would negatively impact recreation, scenic views, and the rural character that residents and visitors value so deeply in Temecula. This corridor is used by families, hikers, equestrians, and community members who enjoy the open space and natural landscape. Industrializing this area with massive transmission infrastructure is not consistent with the vision many residents have for our city’s future.

I urge you to oppose this proposal and advocate for alternative solutions that better protect Temecula residents, wildlife, open space, and property owners. Please stand with the community in preserving the safety, beauty, and character of the Temecula Creek Corridor.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Morgan Joyce

Temecula, CA

From:Council Comments
To:Mason Poehlman
Subject:RE: Opposition to the Golden Pacific Powerlink in the Temecula Creek Corridor Date:Thursday, May 14, 2026 12:51:00 PM
Received.

From: Mason Poehlman
Subject: Opposition to the Golden Pacific Powerlink in the Temecula Creek Corridor

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Mayor and Members of the Temecula City Council,

Thank you for your continued leadership and for the work you do to protect the quality of life that makes Temecula such an exceptional place to live. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed transmission towers planned for the Temecula Creek corridor, also known as the Golden Pacific Powerlink.

The Temecula Creek corridor is one of the last remaining natural open spaces within our city limits. It provides vital wildlife habitat, supports groundwater recharge, and contributes to the scenic, recreational, and environmental character that residents deeply value. The installation of large-scale transmission towers through this sensitive area would cause permanent harm to the landscape and diminish a natural resource that has shaped Temecula’s identity for generations.

Beyond environmental concerns, the proposed route raises serious issues related to wildfire risk, public safety, and long-term economic impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. Many residents believe that alternative routes or undergrounding options must be fully evaluated before moving forward with a project of this magnitude. Every year this area has several wildfires that end up perilously close to Morgan Hill and Temecula Creek and with these added towers I feel that risk would substantially increase.

I respectfully urge the City Council to take a strong position opposing the current proposal and to advocate for a more responsible, community-centered approach. Your voice carries significant

influence in regional planning discussions, and your leadership is essential in ensuring that Temecula’s natural resources and neighborhoods are protected.

Thank you for your time, your service, and your commitment to safeguarding the future of our city.

Sincerely,

Mason Poehlman

From: Council Comments
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2026 12:51 PM
To: Kelly Vogt (HRSC Finance)
Subject: RE: Golden Pacific Powerlink
Received.

Randi Johl
Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
City of Temecula
(951)694-6421
randi.johl(a)TemeculaCA.gov
TemeculaCA.gov
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.

From: Kelly Vogt (HRSC Finance)
Sent:Thursday, May 14, 2026 11:25 AM
To:Council Comments
Subject: Golden Pacific Powerlink
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I am sending a note to request you oppose the proposed Temecula Creek Power Transmission Tower project called "Golden" Pacific. We do not want this to go through our city. I appreciate your support on this council!
Thank you!
Kelly Vogt (HRSC Finance) I Hotel Revenue Manager
NI
,.... p e: [email protected]
p: 760-751-3270 I r
Fri �- �J 11arraI' . Harrah's Resort Southern California • RESORT 777 Harrahs Rincon Way
SOUTHOWNEERD BV NME RINC CALIFORNIA Valley Center, CA 92082 ON TRIM00Xo
1 From:Council Comments
To:Alessandra Thornton; [email protected]; [email protected]; Council Comments Subject:RE: High voltage towers running trough Temecula and De Luz are a health and fire hazard Date:Thursday, May 14, 2026 12:50:00 PM
Received.

From: Alessandra Thornton
Subject: High voltage towers running trough Temecula and De Luz are a health and fire hazard

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Supervisor Washington and Temecula City Council Representatives, As a citizen and business owner in Temecula, I am writing to formally oppose the San Diego Gas and Electric proposal to install 120- to 190-foot towers for a 500 KV transmission line spanning 100 miles through our horse ranches, wine country, and Temecula Parkway.

We have several significant concerns regarding this project:
- Health Risks: Studies have linked proximity to high-power transmission lines and their electromagnetic fields to serious health issues, including leukemia and other cancer-related illnesses.
- Environmental and Aesthetic Impact: The proposed route through the De Portola Road wineries and our rural countryside will ruin the landscape. These towers will be an eyesore for both residents and the visitors who support our local economy. - Fire Safety and Wind Hazards: Our valley experiences strong Santa Ana winds that pose a risk of knocking down these structures. Given the history of devastating wildfires in California, such as the tragedy in Maui, this project introduces an unacceptable level of risk to our community.
- Insurance and Economic Stability: We are already facing a crisis with homeowners insurance. Many insurers have left the state, and those of us remaining must pay significantly higher premiums for multiple policies. The "Golden Corridor" project will

further increase fire risk, potentially making home insurance completely unaffordable for residents in Temecula and De Luz.

Please deny the permits for this project. It represents a direct threat to the health, safety, and economic well-being of our citizens. We must preserve the character and safety of our community.

Sincerely,
Alessandra Thornton
Owner, Andean Amazon Treasures

1 Subject:FW: Case Nos: Pa23-0327 and PA23-0251
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 10:35 AM
To: Eric Jones
Subject: Case Nos: Pa23-0327 and PA23-0251

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Eric Jones
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590

Eric Jones:

I’m addressing case Nos: PA23-0327 and PA23-0251 which is also the Redhwak Gold Course Specific Plan use for special events wedding etc.

I’m very much opposed to allow additional days for these kinds of events. When these functions take place it is like having a concert in my backyard. It is loud and disruptive. And more than annoying. My windows cannot be opened because of the noise. I have lived here on Tiburcio Drive since 2009 and have had to deal with this intrusion. To think of this disruption up to three times a week is incredible. I implore you to decline their request.

Respectfully :

Glenn Whitney

Temecula, CA 92592

1 Subject:FW: PA23-0327 & PA23-0251
Attachments:Redhawk letter.doc

From: John Potts
Subject: PA23-0327 & PA23-0251

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

John T Potts

JOHN POTTS

 Temecula, California 92592 

SENT VIA EMAIL
May 24,2026

Eric Jones
Community Development Department
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula 92590

RE: Case No.: PA23-0327 & PA23-0251

Dear Mr. Jones:

I have spent over 30 years in Land Development of large-scale communities and Government Real Estate at an executive level. I say this because I do not like speaking out against another’s project.

I oppose the mitigated negative declaration for the referenced project because I do not believe Redhawk will manage the facility appropriately. Golfers who have played the Stonehouse course at Temecula Creek Inn (before Pechanga acquired it) have experienced issues with wedding participants. The seventh hole lies across the creek from the Stonehouse wedding venue, and attendees often wandered onto the golf course. That conduct was rude, disruptive, and dangerous. I expect similar problems at Redhawk during Saturday and Sunday evening events, especially when golf course staff are occupied with end-of- day duties such as collecting carts.

There is a gate at the Camino Santiago Cul de sac with an opening large enough for pedestrian access/egress adjacent to the proposed project. I expect people will park in the Cul de sac and wander down to the facility. In addition, attendees may wander to the 10th hole tee box or pond, disrupting golfers. Frequently, pedestrian interlopers use the golf course as their walking path, and I have yet to see golf course address the issue.

I have direct evidence that the course management will not manage the facility as it should be managed.

I have repeatedly requested that the course maintain their vegetation behind my house across from the ladies’ tenth hole tee box. The vegetation has been allowed to exceed the height of the masonry portion of the wall and if it caught fire, it is about twenty-five feet from the residence structure. I have visited in person with the promise of a call back which has never come. I have written numerous times with no response. I have offered to help defray the cost…no response.

Why would we believe that any issues with the facility will be different? The behavior of the course management dictates that a neg dec is premature. There are issues that need to be addressed.

Sincerely,

John T. Potts

1 Subject:FW: Formal Request: Nicolas Valley Rezoning – Agenda Inclusion for May 26 Meeting

From: Andy Hong ; Jennifer Williams
Subject: Formal Request: Nicolas Valley Rezoning – Agenda Inclusion for May 26 Meeting

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members,

I am a landowner in Nicolas Valley, and I am writing to respectfully request that the City Council place the Nicolas Valley zoning issue on the May 26 meeting agenda or direct staff to formally address it within the current General Plan revision process.

My property is currently zoned for very low density (approximately one dwelling unit per 2.5 acres). This designation is an outdated legacy; over the last 20 years, the surrounding landscape has fundamentally changed. While the City and developers have benefited from high-density tract housing nearby, Nicolas Valley has become an "island" of low-density zoning that serves as a buffer for more intensive developments.

This creates an inequitable planning outcome. My property is restricted to a 2.5-acre density despite being adjacent to areas with significantly higher residential density. This mismatch is economically unsustainable and does not reflect the area’s developed reality. Furthermore, infrastructure improvements—such as the extension of Nicolas Road and the expansion of Butterfield Stage Road— demonstrate that our area now has the capacity to support higher residential density.

I am advocating for a logical transition to a low-to-medium density residential designation, such as 1/2 acre minimums. My property sits right next to 1/2 acre density sub-area. This would better balance neighborhood character with landowner fairness and modern planning standards.

The current General Plan update is the ideal time to correct these archaic planning decisions. I respectfully request that the Council:

1. Place this matter on the May 26 agenda or include it in the General Plan discussion.

2. Direct planning staff to review the current very low-density designation.

3. Consider revising Nicolas Valley to a medium-density designation consistent with surrounding patterns.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

2 Sincerely,

Andy Hong
Temecula Owner

Temecula City CouncilMay 26, 2026

Temecula City Council
May 26, 2026