Page1168
Public / Traffic Safety Commission Agenda October 27, 2022
7. Traffic Engineer's Report
A(fach ments: Traffic Engineer's Report - September 2022
DIRECTOR REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORT,
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Pub IIcMatrio Safety Commission w i I I be head on Thursday, November 24, 2 02 2, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 lvlain Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
fhe full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at Icast 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Public Works acpartmcnt at (951) 694-6444.
Page1169
�
F
A.
M-. M
it-
r'3+
. 2F
- _-8
o IL
Ri
! Fl�
or f
2L
p o
Page1170
Jn compliane 557Lh 16e Amer- umk5 vrdb DLSab ILIL'S ALL, If yuu nL-L!IJ 3pLTIA a577s1an L'L' 10 part Lf'Ipa[C 7n Lhss 713L'L'[Ing_ pla&w Lima, Lhe oPfiLL of the City CLark (951 ) k9W-6449. NDUCcaLion 4Ji holes pr;rc Lu a rnlxting w11l mabit: Lhc CAV [L} Tah L' C{'S. K3IIO'hIc .�TdnLmwxi[s to L'7LSIlLL' aL'LL-.ul LI�I S' [GF 1LlaL RIL'L�L71� [f� �1-}[. �J. 1Ui. #.L ,�LJ..� I[L{ IJ].
AGENDA
TEMIECULA PUBLIC I TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETINC:
COUNCIL C IN AM BERS
41 NO MAIN STREET
TEMEC IJLA, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 26, 2023 - 6:00 PM
CALL TO0RDER, Chairperson Richard.wn
FLAC. SALUTE: CDMMisaianer C srtrr
SWEAR] NG I N. lames Richardwa, Brudk-v Su Ilivaa
ROLL CALL: Ackerman, CArtrr, Mali", R rchardson, Sullivan A total of YC minutes is provided For members of the public to address the Commission on matters net listed an the agenda- Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes- Public comments may be made in person all [he meeting by submitting a Speaker card to the C01=.ss3on Seci-riory or b}' submi[[ing an email to be read aloud into the record all the mecums_ Email oornmcnts must be submitted to PublicTratTLcSafetyComLm'LSsiom�te=ulaoa-pv- Speaker cards far in -person comments wi]L be called in the Hader received by the C-ammissian Secretary and then- if time remains, email cacn:cnenls wil L be reed- Email conunents on all malusrs must be receivrd prior to the time the i[em IF. caLLed for public oornrnents, All pubhLr participation is governed b)' Lhr Council policy regarding Public Participation or Meetings adopted by Resolution No- 2021-54-
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Csonsent C-alendw are considered to be routine and all wi]L be e[Lactrd by one roll call vote- Thor wiLL be no discussion of these itrns unless members of the Commission roquest specific items be removed Fioazr the Consent Calendar for separate action_ A Iota- of 3Qminutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items [Plat appear on the Comscnt Calendar. Each speaker is limited In 3 minutes_ Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by sLL 11 ing an email to be read alowl into the reconi all the meeting. Ems -I] comments must be submitted to Pub['LcTrafFLrSafetyCormnissionCterneculaLia_gov_ Speaker owds far in -person comments wi]L be called in the Hader r1rPrived by the Commission Secretary and then- if time rrmains, email con news n'] L be reed- Email comments on all matters must be recLI'vr:d prior to the time the i[em is caLLed for public ooa ments, All pubhLr participation is governed by the C cmnci l policy regarding Public Participa[ion or Meetings adopted by ResGlution No- 2021-54-
Pssge 1
Page1171
PUh1 is l Traffic :daft-t►- ['ommissiun Agenda January 26, 20n
1. ARprove .fiction M mutes of Octobcr 27. 2022
Rccomrnendatinn
Altarhmtni-c•
BUSS [MESS
That the PLIb]3'dTrafFLP Safety Commission apprGlm the Action Minutes of October 27- 2022-
Action MinuteS
Members of the public may address the Cor=ission on Business items that appear on the agenda_ raa speaker is limited to S minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting, by submitting, a speaker card to the Commission Scmvtar} Dr by submitting an email to be read aloud into the roxmi at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to Pub] icTraflicSafetyConr nissiang,t,emrrubwa_gov- Speaker cards far in -person comments will be Palled in Lh,e order rcrcived by the Commission Secretary and tben, if time remains, emaiL comments will be read_ Email comments om All matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments_ All public participadcln is govem,rd by the COLmPIJ Policy regarding Public Participation at Mkxiings adopted by ResoLutaln o_ 2021-34_ 2- Ptvcc ive a Presentation -om Final Draft of 2022 Local Hazard Nliti gation Plan Recommendation: Thai the Pub]ic/TrafiP Safety Commission recC3'vr and fi le the Final Draft -al' the 2022 Local Hazord Mitigation Plan.
Aftaehiiiirrufs• Agoda Report
Cb of Tmrnerula Local Hard Mi tigation Plan 2022
Public Traffic Safely Commission LHMP BrieF
K
4_
S.
ARRMC Change in Ordinance Regarding Cralf'Cam on City Streets Recomrncndatinn: That the PubhcrTraftic 5afcq Ccnmmssim direct stmff'to provide an amendment Co Chapter L0-44 of the Municipal Code to define and locate golf can use and Pressings in the City -
A tachmtni-c: ftmda Report
ahibit A - Draft Ordinance
Camparwla V ay - Traffic -Catming Analysis
Rgcommendation: That the Pub]icrrrafFic Safety Commission dirrml staff to maintain current design conditions and continue to ummiior Campanula Way beoNxen de Portola Road and M eadows Parkway-
Attaehmc 153 Agoda Report
exhibit A - Location Mao
Exhibit B - Multi -Way Stop Warrant Analysis
Election of Chairpenson and Vicc-Cheirp�
Recommendation: That the Pub]idTrafFiP Salty Commission elect a Chairperson and Vices -Chairperson to Preside through the 2023 Calendar Year_ Papt 2
Page1172
Public I Traffic SBFCt►' 1='nmmis-ci0n Agenda
:lttaehmt nlsl Agenda Report
DIVISION REPORT (Rrrcive and Filel
2_
IL
9_
California Hi &hewn Pacral Report
AttachirI Cal ifomia Hi Oh ay NiF13L Report - Uccembm 2022 Police Chiefs Report
AlUrli ruhl,
Fire Chiefs R,cpoat
Attwth�ub•
Police Chiefs kmm-t - December 2022
Firc Chiefs fturt - Dr uembcr 2M
Tratfiu E*nerras Report
Attachmeuh., Traffics Cntcineei's Report - December 2022
D I RECTOR REPORT
rIII;lm m I m Um
ADJOUR-N lENT
anuary 26. 2023
The next regular meeting of the PubLiu Traffic Safety Comunission will be held on ThuisdayT February 23, 2023_ at 6:00 p.m., m the Counoll Cbambers Located at 4 L 0 M ain Street, Temecula, Cal rfomia.
NOTICE TO THE P[JEIJC
The M agenda packet L krh ding 9tafF rcp3ft5 and any suppLcmcnta] matcnal available after the origins] posting of the agcoda� distributed to a majority of the PubL[c Traffic Safety 'C'Orrm1ssioa rcprding any item on the agenda, will be availabLe for public viewing in lh,e main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at Least 72 hours prior to the mcdin& The nmicrial wiLL also he availab]e on the City's websile at TurwculaCa.Ww. and avaiLaNe far rtview al the resprcth-C Taecting. If you have qutstLams regarding any ilcm on the agenda, please conlacl the Pub -lie Works Department at (451) 694 6444.
Page1173
f-
gL
3�3I'1
'IF
' Frf -
Page1174
Table App 5.1- Essential (Critical) Facilities - City of Temecula Fire Department (FD)
Conventional Wood Frame
Fire Station 12
28330 Mercedes St
1947
6,000 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$ 1,065,000
slab foundation
Conventional Wood Frame
Fire Station 73
27415 Enterprise Circle
6,956 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$2,260,700.00
West
2016
slab foundation
Concrete Masonry bearing
Fire Station 84
30650 Pauba Rd
1996
9,727 sq ft
walls w wood roof deck
$3,161,275.00
supported by wood joists
Conventional Wood Frame
Fire Station 92
32211 Wolf Creek Dr
2007
9,030 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$2,934,750.00
slab foundation
Conventional Wood Frame
Fire Station 95
32131 South Loop Ranch
2005
6,000 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$1,950,000.00
slab foundation
Conventional Wood Frame
Fire Station 73
27415 Enterprise Circle
2016
6,956 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$2,260,700.00
West
slab foundation
Emergency Management
Pre-engineered Steel
Emergency
Operations Center
41000 Main St
2010
100,000 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$32,500,000.00
pad column footings over
(Primary)
a concrete slab foundation
Concrete tilt -up bearing
Emergency
walls, steel framing, wood
Operations Center
30600 Pauba Rd
2006
34,003 sq ft
$11,050,975.00
roof deck supported by
(Alternate)
wood joists
TCC Trailer / CERT
32364 Overland Trail
2005
1,000 sq ft
Manufactured Trailer
Compound
Riverside County Sheriff's Department (RSD)
Old Town Temecula
Steel Frame w Concrete
28690 Mercedes St. St B
2009
3,330 sq ft
$1,082,250.00
Store Front
Topped Metal Decks
Promenade Mall
40820 Winchester Rd
Steel Frame w Concrete
1999
3,000 sq ft
Store Front
#2020
Topped Metal Decks
California Highway
27685 Commerce Center
6,950 sq ft
Patrol
Drive
Page1175
City of Temecula Facilities
Food Pantry/ Help Center
Conventional Wood Frame
28922 Pujol St
1967
1,800 sq ft
Structure over basement
$585,000.00
and Barn
foundation
Conventional Wood Frame
S.A.F.E.
28910 Pujol St
2009
3,700 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$1,202,500.00
slab foundation
Pre-engineered Steel
Civic Center
41000 Main St
2010
100,000 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$32,500,000.00
pad column footings over
a concrete slab foundation
Conventional Wood Frame
Temecula Wedding Chapel
41970 Moreno Rd
1997
1,587 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$515,775.00
slab foundation
Conventional Wood Frame
Temecula Valley Museum
28314 Mercedes
1999
7,200 sq ft
Structure over concrete
$2,340,000.00
slab foundation
Conventional Wood Frame
Temecula Children's
42081 Main Street
1990
7,600 sq ft
Structure over crawl space
$2,470,000.00
Museum
foundation
Steel Frame w Metal
Decks over concrete raft
foundation slab for the
new building. Masonry
Mercantile Building
42051 Main Street
1890
22,330 sq ft
Bearing walls w roof deck
$7,257,250.00
supported by wood joists
w wall footing foundation
system for the old
building.
Masonry bearing walls
Mary Phillips Senior Center
41845 Sixth St
1993
9,296 sq ft
and wood framed
$3,021,200.00
structure on concrete slab
Steel Frame w Concrete
Field Operations Center I
43230 Business Park
2007
17,747 sq ft
Topped Metal Decks over
$5,767,775.00
Dr
concrete pad column
footings
Steel Frame w Concrete
Field Operations Center II
43210 Business Park
2001
8,862 sq ft
Topped Metal Decks over
$2 880,150.00
(West Wing)
Dr
concrete pad column
footings
Temecula Valley
Concrete tilt -up bearing
Entrepreneurs Exchange
43200 Business Park
1990
30,187 sq ft
walls, steel framing, metal
$9,810,775.00
(TVE2)
Dr
roof deck, steel joists
Page1176
Concrete tilt -up bearing
Temecula Public / Ronald
30600 Pauba Rd
2006
34,003 sq ft
walls, steel framing, wood
$11,050,975.00
Roberts library
roof deck supported by
wood joists
Grace Mellman
41000 County
1972
15,000 sq ft
Center D
Conventional Wood Frame
Jefferson Recreation
41375 McCabe
1993
20,000 sq ft
Str over Concrete Slab
$6,500,000.00
Center
Court
Foundation
Harveston Community
28582 Harveston Dr
2004
1750 sq ft
Mason Bearing Walls w
$568,750.00
Room
Wood Frame Roof
Conventional Wood Frame
Temecula community
28816 Pujol St
1984
5918 sq ft
Str over Concrete Slab
$1,923,350.00
Center(TCC)
Foundation
Mason Bearing Walls w
Community Recreational
30875 Rancho Vista
1993
26480 sq ft
wood roof deck supported
$8,606,000.00
Center (CRC) /Pool
Rd
by wood joists
Margarita Recreation
29119 Margarita Rd
2016
8,069 sq ft
Under Construction
Center
Conventional Wood Frame
Mary Phillips Senior Center 41845 6th Street 1993 9,248 sq ft Str over Concrete Slab $3,021,200 Foundation
Old Town Temecula Mason Bearing Walls w
Community Theater 42051 Main St 2005 22,330 sq ft wood roof deck supported $7,257,250 by wood joists
Page1177
Table App 5.2 - Additional (Critical) Facilities - City of Temecula 0 A Fire Stations
llt
Pechanga Station 1
48240 Pechanga Rd 1998
Universities
Mt. San Jacinto College (MSJC)
41888 Motor Car Pkwy 2008
358,500 sq ft
Commercial /
$ 152,824,913.00
Temecula Valley Campus
Industrial
California State University San
43890 Margarita Rd
Marcos (CSUSM)
One Better W2o0rl0d Circle Suite
2005
4,773 sq ft
University of Redlands
San Joaquin Valley College (SJVC)
27270 Madison Ave #103
2003
1,649 sq ft
The University of America
41707 Winchester Rd #301
1988
St. John's University
40945 County Center Drive 1988 1,433 sq ft
Suite H
Residential Care Facilities
Temecula Healthcare Center
44280 Campanula Wy
2020
65,877 sq ft
Commercial /
$29,868,335.00
Industrial
Temecula Memory Care
44320 Campanula Way
2020
25,441 sq ft
Commercial
$29 868,335.00
/Industrial
Modern Single -
Chardonnay Hills Care Home
31416 Chemin Chevalier
2002
3,352 sq ft
Family
Residence
$660,000.00
(Post 1990)
Highgate Senior Living at
42301 Moraga Rd
2017
98,906 sq ft
Commercial /
$17,669,401.00
Temecula
Industrial
Atria Park of Vintage Hills
41780 Butterfield Stage Rd
2000
67,469 sq ft
Commercial /
$10,831,720.00
Industrial
Modern Single -
Family
Family First Residential Care
42299 Faber Ct
2005
3,254 sq ft
Residence
$573,907.00
(Post 1990)
Senior Wyze Senior Care &
41593 Winchester Rd
i 1989
43,797 sq ft
Commercial /
$9,600,000.00
Assisted Living
Industrial
Modern Single -
Rising Star Care Home
40600 Chantemar Wy
2001
1,999 sq ft
Family
Residence
$348,845.00
(Post 1990)
Modern Single -
Pebble Brook Senior Assisted
33722 Pebble Brook Cir
2006
3,528 sq ft
Family
$720,590.00
Living
Residence
(Post 1990)
Modern Single -
The Hills of Alcoba
34038 Turtle Creek
2006
3,243 sq ft
Family Residence
$510,129.00
(Post 1990)
Modern Sin
Gentle Care
39799 Longleaf St
2002
3,538 sq ft
Family
Residence
$482,971.00
(Post 1990)
Page1178
Modern Single -
Assisted Living Enterprises
30951 Sawgrass Ct
1986
2,288 sq ft
Family
$525,384.00
Residence
(Post 1990)
Modern Single -
Helping Hands Care Homes
33999 Tuscan Creek Way
2006
3,243 sq ft
Family
$590,513.00
Residence
(Post 1990)
Khayal Ami Care, Inc
27475 Ynez Rd
2016
5,107 sq ft
Commercial /
$1,827,374.00
Industrial
Hospitals
Commercial /
Temecula Valley Hospital
31700 Temecula Pkwy
2013
202,640 sq ft
industrial
$133,521,929.00
Mass Care and Shelter
Sites
Mason
Bearing Walls
w wood roof
$8,606,000.00deck
Community Recreation Center
30875 Rancho Vista Road
1993
26,480 sq ft
supported by
wood joists
$119,693,420
Temecula Valley High School
31555 Rancho Vista Road
1985
371,823 sq ft
Great Oak High School
32555 Deer Hollow Way
2004
290,388 sq ft
$96,179,570
Chaparral High School
27215 Nicolas Road
1996
377,513 sq ft
$84,778,820
Conventional
Wood Frame
Pechanga Resort and Casino
45000 Pechanga Parkway
1998
Structure
over concrete
slab
foundation
Page1179
Table App 5.3 — New Additional Critical Assets - City of Temecula SMER Solar Farm
Rancho Ca Water District
Solar Farm
Ranch at Sommers Bend
Sports Park
Patricia H. Birdsall Sports
Park and Snack Shack
Utilities
Santa Margarita
2017
Ecological Reserve
42135 Winchester Road
2016
Parks
32125 Verbena Way
2020
32380 Deer Hollow
Way
2006
10,000 plus
16 acres photovoltaic (PV)
modules
17 acres Solar Photovoltaic
Conventional
800 sq ft Wood Frame Str $260,000.00
over Concrete Slab
Foundation
Mason Bearing
Walls w wood roof
800 sq ft deck supported by $260,000.00
wood joists on a
concrete raft slab
foundation
Wastewater Complex
Temecula Valley Regional 42565 Avenida 1975 95 sq ft
Water Reclamation Facility Alvarado
Water Complex
Pre -case concrete
San Diego Aqueduct 1945 pipe, 48-96 inches
in diameter
Page1180
Table App 5.4 — Houses of Worship - City of Temecula
Houses of Worship
Crossroads Church 26090 Ynez Rd Ste A
1998 102,200 sq ft Commercial /
$6,494,590.00
Industrial
Crosspoint Church 28753 Via Montezuma
1987 19,480 sq ft Commercial /
$1,809,708.00
Industrial
Reliance Church 29825 Santiago Rd
1890 1,430 sq ft Commercial /
$1,318,722.00
Industrial
Sunridge Community Church 42299 Winchester Rd
1890
1,430 sq ft
Commercial /
$1,359,030.00
Industrial
27462 Enterprise Circle
Calvary Chapel of Temecula
1989
8,848 sq ft
Commercial /
$1,543,178.00
West
Industrial
Rancho Church
31300 Rancho
2017
73,783 sq ft
Commercial /
$19,532,446.00
Community Wy
Industrial
Temecula Christian
27715 Jefferson Ave
Fellowship
Suite 114
1982
3,890 sq ft
5,572 sq ft
Beyond the Walls
42110 Remington Ave
2006
Commercial /
$811,512.00
Community Church
Industrial
Temecula Hills Christian
28780 Single Oak Dr Ste
Commercial /
Fellowship
120 1985
2,618 sq ft
Industrial
Cornerstone Christian
40880 County Center
1991
41,210 sq ft
Commercial /
$2,723,769.00
Baptist
Dr Ste N
Industrial
Rancho Baptist Church
29775 Santiago Rd
1992
4,200 sq ft
Commercial /
$2,394,308.00
Industrial
Springs Community Church
41735 Winchester Rd
1992
91,991 sq ft
$3,926,468.00
Atmosphere Church
27500 Jefferson Ave.
2019
Commercial /
21,453 sq ft
Industrial
Commercial /
Calvary Baptist Church
31087 Nicolas Rd
1776
$3,721,207.00
Industrial
Hope Lutheran Church 29043 Vallejo Ave
2016
15,000 sq ft Commercial /
$4,977,040.00
Industrial
Fusion Christian Church 26770 Ynez Ct
1999
16,978 sq ft
Commercial /
$2,798,594.00
Industrial
New Life Church
27620 Commerce
1985
Commercial /
25,920 sq ft $1,751,389.00
Center Dr #105
Industrial
Grace A.M.E. Church
41625 Enterprise Cir S
1987
5,850 sq ft Commercial / $2,383,182.00
B-2
Industrial
Temecula United Methodist
42690 Margarita Rd
1995
5,063 sq ft Commercial / $1,558,073.00
Industrial
Covenant Fountain Church
27645 Jefferson Ave Ste
1989
Commercial /
27,745 sq ft $5,694,574.00
111
Industrial
11,295 sq ft Commercial / $2 996,171.00
St Catherine of Alexandria
41875 C St
1991
28780 Old Town Front
Industrial
True Vine Pentecostal
1776
Commercial /
$4,369,816.00
Church
St Ste D5
Industrial
Providence Presbyterian 31950 Pauba Rd 1990
14,278 sq ft
Commercial / $9 510,737.00
Industrial
Faith Bible Church Murrieta 27470 Jefferson Ave 1991
16,000 sq ft
Commercial / $1,981,706.00
1 Industrial
Page1181
Grace Presbyterian Church
31143 Nicolas Rd
2006
14,275 sq ft
Commercial / $3,721,207.00
Industrial
Trellis Community Church
27576 Commerce
Commercial /
$5,916,000.00
Center Dr Ste 108
Industrial
The Place City of Miracles
41823 Enterprise Cir N
2004
18,894 sq ft
Commercial /
$2,928,058.00
Cathedral
#100
Industrial
Commercial / $1,529,079.00
Light of Faith Christian
27727 Jefferson Ave
1987
17,285 sq ft
Center
Industrial
Temecula Valley Church / St
44651 Avenida De
Commercial /
Thomas of Canterbury 2009
Missiones
16,371 sq ft
Industrial
$4,723,446.00
Episcopal
single family
The Church in Temecula 45764 Corte Mislanca 2013
3,779 sq ft
residence (post
$472,082.00
1990)
18,555 sq ft
Commercial /
The Potters House Christian 41669 Winchester Rd
1991
$3,213,000.00
Church Ste 106
Industrial
The Church of Jesus Christ
44650 La Paz St
2004
Commercial /
14,760 sq ft $3,291,881.00
LDS
Industrial
Nu -Way Christian Ministries
Commercial /
27576 Commerce
Center Dr
Industrial
Transformation Church
41636 Enterprise Cir N 1999
3,564 sq ft Commercial / $529,200.00
D-E
Industrial
5,590 sq ft
Commercial /
Trinity Temecula
30470 Pauba Rd 1997
and 3,369 sq $2,575,540.00
ft Industrial
Grace Fellowship
41710 Enterprise Cir S
1989
Commercial /
14,848 sq ft $867,339.00
#C
Industrial
The Call of Temecula Valley
43234 Business Park Dr
Commercial /
$6,775,043.00
#107
27475 Ynez Rd
Industrial
$7,493,986.00
Oasis Christian Fellowship
1983
2,520 sq ft Commercial /
$1,257,179.00
Iglesia Bautista Del Valle De
28639 Pujol St
Temecula
Industrial
28780 Old Town Front
1776
Bethlehem Temple
Commercial /
$4,369,816.00
Community Church
St
41951 Moraga Rd
Industrial
Ridgeline Community
School
Church
28924 Old Town Front
$1,734,000.00
St Rafael Orthodox Christian
Church
St #102
Jesus Love Korean Church
27570 Commerce
1988
23,794 sq ft
Commercial /
$4,008,249.00
Center #125
Industrial
Christian Science Society
28780 Old Town Front
1776
Commercial /
$4,369,816.00
Street A6
Industrial
$1,040,476.00
St Thomas the Hermit Coptic 42101 Moraga Rd
1989
7,336 sq ft Commercial /
Orthodox
2006
Industrial
24,119 sq ft Commercial /
$6,565,232.00
The Church of Jesus Christ
32374 Pauba Rd
LDS
Industrial
Mosiac Assembly of God
31217 Pauba Rd
$3,300,000.00
The Holy Spirit Empowered
Single family
39830 Longleaf St
2002
3,966 sq ft
residence (post
$365,783.00
Presbyterian
1990)
Page1182
Harvest House Temecula
28975 Old Town Front
$3,393,062.00
St Ste 101
Commercial /
28030 Del Rio Rd 1973 10,000 sq ft
$1,416,340.00
Temecula Valley Korean
Presbyterian
industrial
$1,366,800.00
Iglesia Cristiana Jesu Cristo
27713 Jefferson Ave
1984
9,560 sq ft
Commercial /
es la Respuesta
#105
industrial
Virgin Mary Arabic Church,
42030 Avenida
$1,760,007.00
Melkite Catholic
Alvarado Ste A
Family Life Church of the
41743 Enterprise Cir N
$3,307,500.00
Valley
#108
Modern single -
The Church in Temecula
41783 Niblick Rd
2000 2,552 sq ft
family residence
$439,570.00
2003 6,558 sq ft
(post 1990)
The Church of Jesus Christ
29657 N General
Commercial /
$5,451,043.00
LDS
Kearny Rd
industrial
Essential Church
41710 Enterprise Cir S
1989 14,848 sq ft
Commercial /
$867' 339.00
industrial
Southern Cal District Church
28465 Old Town Front
1984 5,385 sq ft
Commercial /
$1,081,107.00
of Nazarene
Street #313
industrial
Center for Spiritual Living
27895 Diaz Rd Suite A
1981
6,000 sq ft
Commercial /
$415,210.00
industrial
World Mission Society
42041 Avenida 1987
17,552 sq ft
Commercial /
$612,379.00
Church
Alvarado #A
industrial
3,600 sq ft
Commercial /
Calvary Chapel Bible 34180 Rancho 1987
11,056 sq ft
industrial $2 824,018.00
Fellowship California Rd
2,304 sq ft
1,200 sq ft
16,300 sq ft
The Church of Jesus Christ 43940 Pacific Sunset Dr 2009 Commercial / $5,945,813.00
LDS
industrial
Iglesia Rancho en Espanol
31300 Rancho
2017
73,783 sq ft
Commercial /
$18,953,105.00
Community Way
industrial
Iglesia Ni Cristo
29385 Rancho
1997
14,481 sq ft
Commercial /
$2,871,252.00
California Rd
industrial
Unity Church Temecula 41919 Moreno Rd
1977
2,560 sq ft
Commercial /
$1,136,553.00
Valley
industrial
1998
102,200 sq ft
Commercial /
$6,494,590.00
Circle of Care Ministry 26090 Ynez Rd
industrial
Modern single -
Church Growth Network 29850 Gateview Ct
1989
3,433 sq ft
family residence
$311,322.00
(1950-1990)
$5,916,000.00
Renewal Life Christian
27576 Commerce
Fellowship
Center Dr Ste 111
Islamic Center of Temecula
31061 Nicholas Rd
2018
4,205 sq ft
Commercial /
$1,610,709.00
industrial
Temple Beth Sholom 28600 Me1r0cedes St Ste
$1,586,589.00
Modern single-
42021 Avenida Vista
Chabad of Temecula 1988
3,673 sq ft
family residence $440,400.00
Ladera
(1950-1990)
Church of Scientology 40945 County Center
$2,880,696.00
Mission Dr C
Page1183
Table App 5.5 - Temecula Valley Unified School District Inventory Data by School Site 1 V VJV UI1 Ll IL.L J1JJV I\QI II.IIV V IJ LQ
Facilities Road
1989 4 24
70,588 sq ft
$12,766,890
TVUSD District & 40516 Roripaugh
Transportation Facility Road
1995 8 1
41,621 sq ft
$4,945,360
Abby Reinke 43799 Sunny
Elementary School Meadows Drive
1999 8 2
88,119 sq ft
$24,234,690
Alamos Elementary 38200 Pacific Park
School Drive
2004 1 9
1 87,604 sq ft
$25,639,780
Bella Vista Middle 31650 Browning
School Street
2004
12 0
130,865 sq ft
$41,418,360
Chapparal High School
27215 Nicolas Road 1996
29 31
377,513 sq ft
$84,778,820
Crowne Hill
Elementary School
33535 Old Kent Road 2005
45125 Via Del
8 1
87,925 sq ft
$25,823,350
Earle Stanley Gardner
Middle School
Colorado 2003
8 0
110,781 sq ft
$35,810,270
French Valley
Elementary School 26680 Cady Road 2003 8 1 79,719 sq ft $25,452,510
32555 Deer Hollow
Great Oak High School Way 2004 39 0 290,388 sq ft
$96,179,570
Helen Hunt Jackson 32400 Camino San
Elementary School Dimas 1999 2 15 59,048 sq ft
$20,839,580
James L. Day Middle 40775 Camino
School Campos Verdes 1999 6 24 97,653 sq ft
$28,433,210
Joan F. Sparkman
Alternative Education
32225 Pio Pico Road
1988
3 12
59,705 sq ft
$20,435,020
K8 Steam Academy
35780 Abelia Street
2021
4 6
54,424 sq ft
$18,904,480
Margarita Middle
30600 Margarita
School
Road
1990
4 19 114,730 sq ft
$37,199,040
Nicolas Valley
39600 North General
Elementary School
Kearney Road
1990
2 33 78,351 sq ft
$22,856,370
Paloma Elementary
School
42940 Via Rami
1995
1 2
16 63,027 sq ft
$21,679,810
Pauba Valley
Elementary School
33125 Regina Drive
1996
3 10
70,976 sq ft
$25,189,980
Rancho Elementary
School
31530 La Serena Way
1986
9 0
70,619 sq ft $21,868,310
Red Hawk Elementary
32045 Camino San
School
Jose
1991
4 2
56,093 sq ft $21,928,830
Susan La Vorgna
Elementary School
31777 Algarve
2004
9 1
78,839 sq ft $25,346,810
Temecula Elementary
School
41951 Moraga Road
1978
7 1
63,719 sq ft
$20,791,200
Temecula Luiseno
45754 Wolf Creek
2005
8 1
78,759 sq ft
$25,276,510
Page1184
Elementary School
Drive North
Temecula Middle
42075 Meadows
School
Parkway
1991
Temecula Prepatory
School
35777 Abelia Street
2006
Temecula Valley
Charter School
35755 Abelia Street
2008
Temecula Valley High
31555 Rancho Vista
School
Road
1985
Tony Tobin
45200 Morgan Hill
Elementary School
Drive
2005
Vail Elementary
29915 Mira Loma
School
Drive
1979
Vail Ranch Middle
33340 Camino Piedra
School
Rojo
1994
Vintage Hills
Elementary School
42240 Camino Romo
1997
Ysabel Barnett
39925 Harveston
Elementary School
Drive
2001
TOTAL
6 16
102,818 sq ft
$31,719,950
1 62
74,600 sq ft
33,168 sq ft
$12,780,220
$5,826,040
31 1
26 38
371,823 sq ft
$119,693,420
8 2
80,678 sq ft
$24,869,790
7 3
71,387 sq ft $23,600,710
105,528 sq ft $29,769,170
68,827 sq ft $24,288,010
6 33
2 13
9 1
78,708 sq ft
$25,301,340
292
370
3,298,603 sq ft
$985,647,400
Page1185
This page is intentionally left blank
Page1186
Date
Magnitude
Name, Location, or Region
Affected
Loss of Life and Property
1700, Jan. 26
9.0 Offshore, somewhere between Cape
Limited data available, magnitude is an
Mendocino and Canada
estimate. Shook northern California, Oregon,
Washington, and southern British Columbia;
caused tsunami
damage to villages in Japan and western US
1857, Jan 9
7.9 Great Fort Tejon earthquake
1 dead; damage from Monterey to
San Bernardino County
1906, Apr 18
7.8 Great 1906 San Francisco Earthquake
3,000 dead; $524 million in property
and Fire
damage (includes damage from fire)
1838, Jun
7.4 San Francisco to San Juan
Limited data available, magnitude is an
Bautista
estimate. Damage to San Francisco and
Santa Clara
1872, Mar 26
7.4 Owens Valley
27 dead; 56 injured; $250,000 in
property damage
1980, Nov 8
7.4 West of Eureka
6 injured; $2 million in property damage
1812, Dec 8
7.3 Wrightwood
Limited data available, magnitude is an
estimate. 40 dead at San Juan Capistrano
1892, Feb 24
7.3 Laguna Salida, Baja California
Damage to San Diego and Imperial Valley
1922, Jan 31
7.3 Offshore, about 70 mi W of Eureka
1952, Jul 21
7.3 Kern County earthquake
12 dead; $60 million in property damage
1954, Dec 16
7.3 Fairview Peak, near Fallon, NV
1992, Jun 28
7.3 Landers
1 dead; 402 injured; $91.1 million in
property damage
1923, Jan 22
7.2 Off Cape Mendocino
Destructive in Humboldt County; strongly
felt in Reno
1932, Dec 21
7.2 Cedar Mountain, near Gabb's, NV
1992, Apr 25
7.2 Petrolia
356 injured; $48.3 million in property damage
1812, Dec 21
7.1 Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa
Limited data available, magnitude is an
Barbara
estimate. 1 dead
1927, Nov 4
7.1 40 km west of Lompoc
Damage in Santa Barbara and San Luis
Obispo counties
1954, Dec 16
7.1 Dixie Valley, near Fallon, NV
1868, Oct 21
7.0 Hayward Fault
30 dead; $350,000 in property damage
1899, Apr 16
7.0 Offshore, about 80 miles west of
Eureka
1934, Dec 31
7.0 In Mexico, about 100 miles SE of El
Centro
1940, May 19
7.0 Imperial Valley
9 dead; $6 million in property damage
1991, Aug 17
7.0 Offshore, about 100 miles NW of
Preceded by two quakes (M 6.3 and 6.2) on
Eureka
Aug. 16 and 17
Page1187
Date
1994, Sep 1
Magnitude
7.0 Name, Location, or Region
Affected
Offshore, about 70 miles W of Cape
Mendocino
Loss of Life and Property
1873, Nov 23
6.9 Crescent City region
Damage in California -Oregon border area
1989, Oct 17
6.9 Loma Prieta
63 dead; 3,737 injured; $6 billion in
property damage
1872, Mar 26
6.8 Owens Valley
Aftershock of previous entry
1872, Apr 11
6.8 Owens Valley
Aftershock of March 26, 1872, quake
1890, Feb 9
6.8 San Jacinto fault
Little damage
1918, Apr 21
6.8 San Jacinto
1 dead; several injuries; $200,000 in
property damage
1925, Jun 29
6.8 Santa Barbara
13 dead; $8 million in property damage
1954, Jul 6
6.8 Rainbow Mountain, near Fallon,
NV
1999, Oct 16
7.1 Bullion Mountains (Hector Mine)
Minimal injuries and damage due to
sparse population in affected area
1954, Aug 24
6.8 Rainbow Mountain, near Fallon,
NV
1976, Nov 26
6.8 Offshore, about 100 mi WNW of
Eureka
1898, Apr 15
6.7 Fort Bragg - Mendocino
Limited data available, magnitude is an
estimate. Damage from Fort Bragg to
Mendocino; 3
houses collapsed; landslides reported
1899, Dec 25
6.7 San Jacinto and Hemet
6 dead; $50,000 in property damage
1994, Jan 17
6.7 Northridge
57 dead; more than 9,000 injured; about
$40 billion in property damage
1892, Apr 19
6.6 Vacaville
1 dead; $225,000 in property damage
1915, Nov 21
6.6 In Mexico, about 60 miles S of El
Centro
1941, Feb 9
6.6 Offshore, about 65 miles W of Eureka
1954, Dec 21
6.6 East of Arcata
1 dead; several injured; $2.1 million in
property damage
1968, Apr 8
6.6 Borrego Mountain
1971, Feb 9
6.6 San Fernando
65 dead; more than 2,000 injured; $505
million in losses
1987, Nov 24
6.6 Superstition Hills
part of above damage
1992, Apr 26
6.6 Petrolia
Aftershock of the Apr. 25 quake
1992, Apr 26
6.6 Petrolia
Another aftershock of Apr. 25 quake
1852, Nov 29
6.5 Near Fort Yuma, Arizona
Limited data available, magnitude is an
estimate.
1860, Mar 15
6.5 Carson City
Limited data available, magnitude is an
estimate.
1865, Oct 8
6.5 Santa Cruz Mountains
$0.5 million in property damage
1918, Jul 15
6.5 Offshore, about 40 W of Eureka
Page1188
Date
1934, Jul 6
Magnitude
6.5 Name, Location, or Region
Affected
Offshore, about 100 mi WNW of
Eureka
Loss of Life and Property
1934, Dec 30
6.5 In Mexico, about 40 miles S of El
Centro
1947, Apr 10
6.5 East of Yermo
1956, Feb 9
6.5 In Mexico, about 80 miles SW of El
Centro
1979, Oct 15
6.5 Imperial Valley
9 injured; $30 million in property damage
1992, June 28
6.5 Big Bear
Included with Landers losses, above
2003, Dec 22
6.5 San Simeon
1836, Jun 10
6.4 Near San Juan Bautista
Limited data available, magnitude is
estimate. Older reports reported quake as
possibly larger
and centered near Oakland
1898, Mar 31
6.4 Mare Island
$350,000 in property damage
1991, Jul 12
6.6 Offshore west of Crescent City
1899, Jul 22
6.4 Wrightwood
Chimneys knocked down; landslides reported
1911, Jul 1
6.4 Morgan Hill area
1933, Mar 11
6.4 Long Beach
115 dead; $40 million in property damage
1942, Oct 21
6.4 About 25 miles W of
Westmoreland
1983, May 2
6.4 Coalinga
1986, Jul 21
6.4 Chalfant Valley
1800, Nov 22
6.3 San Diego/San Juan Capistrano region
Limited data available, magnitude is an
estimate.
Damaged adobe walls of missions in San
Diego and San Juan Capistrano
1922, Mar 10
6.3 Parkfield
1995, Feb 19
6.3 Offshore, about 70 miles W of Cape
Mendocino
1980, May 25
6.2 Mammoth Lakes
1984, Apr 24
6.2 Morgan Hill
$8 million in property damage
1908, Nov 4
6.0 SW of Death Valley
1948, Dec 4
6.0 East of Yermo
1980, May 25
6.0 Mammoth Lakes
1987, Oct 1
6.0 Whittier Narrows
8 dead; $358 million in property
damage to 10,500 homes and
businesses
Page1189
This page is intentionally left blank
Page1190
City of Temecula
2022 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
Public Survey
11 Y I I
City of
Mitigation
Q1 Please indicate whether you live
I22 Local Hazard Oil
orw k in due City of Temecula
Ilxamna aryar.nen
IxMnee Gg of ienen4
7A8%
Ilneandrmkintk [iry oliemwula
2LM%
Nedne �yrymrT,M1nti.n a:ttoa�
5.37%
ue oryrmndrnry
4 06.Please select ehazard you think isthe HIGHEST threat toyour neighborhood? rlpoaing
WindErcnts
[Mque�
Wdaire
Im
iramponalionktidem
ppw<romye/onwpdpe
k, t1i wit 1 Ili_
7 09: If you answered YES to the previous question, please select the types) of disaster{sf that you have been impacted by (select all that apply).
Pi 10.94%
W'mdii—
Earthquake
wuare
larax
irantpona lionktident
Po„<romye/oivuption 84A—d
oNeilpave,aeayl 0.99% IN Skipped
�t 1r�■ � a f m 3n' m nx nx xx ux vx
10 Begin Date: July 11, 2022
End Dale. Nwember 30, 2022
Responses:220
�1: w ikll�%:1
2 community tmm famrds?
xnn a��nr�2 nd96.90%
Poor Pamingana repoott wan enegeoq oravater 98.67%
xgatada ningnnawryingnw 95.02%
xnernrdn ma..nmenornrainm a�angrx 95.57%
emegnryortlnser
Tm ma�raana�a rwmi�e.airrclA.. ngarai.ga. 35A0%
e�xrgenryw da:.r
law
. mweyyim .xyee .rve um .aougre xgmmdyougr� p � m ww
5 07: Please select the hazard you think is the SECOND HIGHEST threat to your neighborhood?
rhoding
wind Ea n is
Earthquake
Wildfire
Terowm
imspwndon kadem
varero.yeioamgew
8 010: The planning team is using various data sources to identity hazards in our community, however, some of these data sources do not provide data at a general citywide level. Are there any smalIscale issues, such as pond ing at a certain intersection during rain, that you would like the planning team to censidef+ 220 Answered
h-1 exec of Ipml head: d Shipped
lemawne Why head:
pleue provide w much detail a paihle,
indeding l e�-,d 1ndt1 prhet.gei.
RE�� a ux xa nx rcx art ®x »» ux nx
11 City of Temecula 2022 Local Hazard 4 Qr
Mitigation Plan Survey V
Ql: Are you aware that up City of Temecula has a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan?
05. The following hazards could potentially impact the City. Please walk THREE (3) hazards that are of most concern to your neighborhood or home? flooding
225 Ans A
I skppw Wnd[.nm
Exnq�awaauwa.ninn
Vflaie
Littany ada'uional M1uarattM1at pRrrnta IM1Rn myom
Inei�horM1ootlwM1w,etherenanemm�etldo,e
iLa
6 08. Have you been impacted by a disaster in your current residence? We
No
9 O11: A number of community -wide activities can reduce our risk from hazards. In general, these activities fall into one of the w broad categories. Please tell us how impohanl you think each one is for your community to consider pursuing:
4.43 3.33
_ 3.28
3.S3 21d Ain,—d
231 10Skipped
N
12 Page1191
012'. If you area homeowner, do you have adequate homeowner's insurance to cover the hazards that could impact your home?
va,mrmrnr„«mrcr�. a�pdm 5.
dequa
N., I dpnmW—, mmem««nrr�e
15.T0%
2i3 Ansvlered
3spippa
.pnA e..a.q�.rer«amaprada.r
un... 12.55%
ra.nmh.n mt acursnu p�6.y OA5%
Nmepd'ak,lrcmnrycunan;d.n« 7,52%
If
13 015: Do you have earthquake insurance for your home? ra, I ram mr m. n Imm. ara na n ®n hp gym.
N., I nm mr wm� ane hm..anap�ar.
M.. but l am Im.refee In mi.wingeanhquak. 2p6 Answered
maumaupiiom ID-pped
d1j� q I i.In
hl 1111W RMM...
019. DO NOT ANSWER SKIM QUESTION 1911asevere hazard everdoccurred today such that all services were cut off from your home (power, gas, water, sewer) and you were unable to leave or access a store for 72 hours, which of these items do you have readily available?
I D6 Answered
1205kipped
ki.nNo;
City of Temecula 2022 Local1
Mitigation
Q21. Are you a member of your Communhy EmergencyResponse Team (CERT), the Temecula Citizen Caps?
re 4.99%
N., anrl.pnka.mlmo«mn..ha,:rdm
a,a ru
k I am nm im—,din heinga n, inA 11 V 223 Anted
mambr sSHIM
IRS T: III lip own.
Q13: If you rent your residence, do you have renters insurance? Ye 7,95% 201 Answered
255klpped
no 23M
Nm ap:,.bl , I pmrmr rmranereie.�
lot
Q16: Do you have fue insumnce for your home?
I re.Ip.n mYQ.n N.maa�dl.nen k,ura�«
Ya,In I my bm.and h.,N,i—n. 7A1%
Np,amlam imar.v.ainr.daaina rir.mYvnna 533%
pp�ap,
rf P1 I 1 a.�.R...i
Q19'. If a severe hazard event occurred today such that all services were cut off from your home (power, gas, water, sewer) and you were unable to leave or access a store for 72 hours, which ofthese items do you have readily available? -m,,.,"al. p,—trp«d.a
e��emuo�'re vw
rr,wavyp.a
wvmxv�nermpmvmmq
u[ndahs.maoa
e aim
72Answeed
I .seeorw am mwur.muguykN sprmwe 1515NiPped
rwrs a ux na' nx m nw mr uti raw mr uy�. , _ , ,
C22. How can the City help you become better prepared for a disaster? fawnaadn �dv!
nalx �rg�wm urN=m.ainmloa.m
—1immsc — 1l 1. mwremmr...
craw«�mm,. us«n.m�v.mle.m.grcv
era....rm.�dreulm m.nd.urc-
« m 212 k-M
rew«=awl BA976 14skippe:
23 014: Doi have flood insurance for your home?
ro,I pun., —home and hm emd inumn«
N. I nntmY home and h—It.dimumnrt
N. bur l m inu!nsea in no-np It.d imunne
kered
I7
ppupna Ekµ9h.wdpmsmn�vrNppdmnh
27 e:
5kipppp
Q17: Have you done anything to your home to make it less vulnerable to hazards such as floods, earthquakes, and fires?
va.
N.714D%
Nn� apdiohk, nm "ry �id.nr.
nN dpp.. plampr lal®: �PRiMi -..�.---
020'. Are you familiar with the special needs ofyom neighbors in the event of a disaster situation (special needs may include limited mobility, severe medical conditions, memory impairmenls)?
220 k-.W
d Skipped
10 MA
010 Comments mw�mm,-. Wmp.p,.:am�e.wm rwmm.*nn mm,....m,ve.�wraw. e.vmremnm�.w
Page1192
QlOfunmais canOnuetl
,.-.H 61 Rd, lx,wJ�m.x•,,.,
nrwLMlwd lFxlpiq Anrvnlhupli dan�IlvxnveJvud LrlJlSmp4xFw myFLuo dxw4(+xnuyiyrvJo m'.eJd wm[li w1ur.Jxiylirvvdvunvli+� x
.m•u....:rvyx�lmin n xlx.xvPyuxJly m • rxmUvxLxuJh
Vx'xhr.il..d..mmiX•LLwdxX idrmiv.ili wxLmirow.id.6xx.o.iix.rqkLxnr.xoomr PoLMvltilx.d
11. mivix'AJuJkI'rrvvr ww
114A . PIIJ'Lriwr Aiy.xwi ixixwL L.dA•mbm.drrmwy LxL6mxA�Lxp Pxl.n io ilxtSF.r�RwydwkR imrLrvuwuui w.0 vyvvldrxe:m Pnlxioi lvm rxixxlrmiJlY'nliwOwErlApw'InxadJvd.uWvN Lml muu::uunilh4wlxouJrvrvYigBnillim mlrm ruv
�.r.� w.y,rryrxlX Wtx,rx.x�w..nl.rrmmx.x.xx�.
vuvnn vuuu nrvxulrvurrx
il. �ti�iop imioryLru ln. ux nmxkm'11 .mm nvnur,ll.lmxy LxulnmruL nvr ]l. ao oi�xlre.r.wlxh ivr..iia+r.orx.J n�r.nu xwxxwLLmr.�iiuddrr_M.exxFW Lix.lmmrw•Lnxwo
I4.IxIrJui nxc:nlmmimilmrnilv'I'mLr ilwlrr
r, r�mw lwmvn �wuJi mrd.
wlr d ��t�,r..rf„xL...xxxwwx.x„„xexerrdw�Rda,R,wur .xR
mold t
25 01i] Commends ooninued
61.lok it"' ,PUt ptt InrmlmilMymubhA%I¢Y[Iw[wtrcn'w k0
SS.Vmyary%rclrcniJal k1 m adrc hmwMRew.tna amlw Hmfaw tMe ofdeRrcMmWun[ne10r �.MryMaµ wnf2R hetwecnkmane BmemmA Sorge rmkve AlleAwmmrewukmmwortdnm[mntWlJl rcWlld mkU mxmr
67.Imm 41tt1 oerrcmrrnudr PkwJm9srclua
�. am re a ntl attmmlex. ar naw,r
se.Pd[nlLlrkadlnn lwrYlM[iJldd:WkMwJLngnxhdw Gwrnn LerxmrrxmnpeM-wwraminzwrYlPrelA {: WAll
7A
DI CommentsconOnued
V. Mill oral Jw.,l Juem ft wm of ine F—R Im RanW ralndmla PA mMwdnYnbxxrcx(nwlNUN. 7B. mnawnmon rtltlema a pwpl-M,.4ht,!l
'B.fana and tlingwlvartlruaaNPwda
N Ilkglnrcwnr6
31. vnc.wrgailn,vch......
ffi. WINPotl menmeprc pomPl[fP¢ur aaMVmlvk wrwknwpM. msImOlMutloYA[ucNa trdrgehrc awmyMme rmdwry. IAehrymaur mmmlmm DIM[Pmmtd IaNa hIM[mr Deem m a m emarardugANmt—thaxtdme ww Ywllrydvema
i1.31mw PooJlryofGwl9mIPM1a[pxd ut[nit mm AtiflNpnN arcaf Jmnp my[[mmuleednl erxnenum[ madwmnrq m etmmmtl sgo, oonaauw vam remnwa varvwa lrrpk lane needs m mcwrav+dwwm iom� nP X[n[fml mlrcr.
$. Mwgrlh LPUJNwYPwkwyenmeSL4rhwnkdRNxrt.MPmdaY Awa
3F PdklsnenwM1ve
m. ua�Awdwrd'aw
9B. wrawomomewm
w. nwhPmika rr3(Ldkdwkva¢PYx.m ,e�xafrwM1krxrwxeAmrtkrd rtww+senJM.oePPlmkPamNr� M1 pmr .mry-it.w lM mwmxyAtta mk wmrammva anJdtd, �- n® :.'�
R 11 l'i,
26 Next Steps
— Data is currently being analyzed to answer the following questions • What does this Information tell us?
• What do we need to do with this information?
• How an we best address the identi ied needs?
• Is any of the data from question 10 useful?
— Mitiption Pgtt
— Puhlir wods Proie(ts
— rmdfimdon s to mhe r depanmenr;
— mdusirn withinthe I MP update
79 010 Comments continued
40. fIOIIPnN<mnmmmeal on the 11—
dl.lnmms:tmn maPowdaaaAwalwoatenahaunrynln
03.ia loaf Awdnremttud Prvryam Marpamoode sw ake.
43. Puml Nµ 19 padlryy mdJ flwo, mnw
a/.nwpmm uPopmmlw amrrer nndl waw..ww emmgerxrlfwwgew,wvwwm makr mn alrp loleo of xlaM1ree ndrmvJ. Po
LS. nwhped I lirl ll;w:mawm-temewa mom
Aa. mrcho olrcana Rmd e m males Amd Pmdem
Ai.ont'LE:(alona. ht 90,14walkrQmwl kmno rWT0, ,
dietlglryu,newaowkatvcLtag amux rePed'np
(rctl aYtmmer[ssn'dWrtYPksc b]rc•,I hl t[vxurton, n[M Nmnkle,t 911, dl."Wlrcx,it,
49.lallhmian &MAkurFut arclmhmrq Nurm m xrllaa tlgrun uttxaLrdminag ndemadueMPrcrcMkd�pinq S0. iemttma(rttw eamdeumnkdss�ira Are avam
aI. Np Imemelppl[5 Mm, [u ua hsrc a b[m [peeky. rc[neuJnwmnxn {ellolming nunw a1 me Imenmon N MPlgm Xc�lf J 9ug�.
91.[nminaak klrymlml[Jfrmn*1,lnv.afNlum[Awme¢ttax[ hUlNlnp »]mrartmpm[m[nlf S9. Lw.dnwnlmmwrcma m�rianda R6 Mdrte OMPmper W IMwrcAu akukao tlgnmwrt mlEpapnrr�r'0 ' ki
27 Page1193
l ECULA
G EINIERA [L PLAN
PUBLIC SAFETY
ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
uality of life in Temecula is influenced in part by the sense of security that exists among City residents and businesses.
The community must be prepared to address issues such as uncontrollable natural hazards, crime and violence, and other human caused hazards. The Public Safety Element establishes goals, policies, and a plan to identify potential hazards and to ensure adequate, coordinated, and timely response to public safety concerns.
The provision of public services which would respond to these hazards are addressed in the Growth Management/Public Facilities Element.
PURPOSE OF THE The purpose of the Public Safety Element is to identify and address PUBLIC SAFETY features or characteristics in or near Temecula that represent a ELEMENT potential hazard to community residents, structures, public facilities, and infrastructure. The Public Safety Element establishes policies to minimize potential danger to residents, workers, and visitors, and identifies actions needed to manage crisis situations, such as earthquakes, fires, and floods. The Element also focuses on preventing criminal activity before it occurs. In addition specific policies and programs are provided to regulate development in hazard -prone areas. Continuing education for City officials and residents about emergency preparedness is also addressed.
SCOPE AND The Public Safety Element satisfies the requirements of State CONTENT OF THE planning law and is a mandated component of the City's General PUBLIC SAFETY Plan. Government Code section 65302(g) sets forth a list of hazards that the Element must cover, if they pertain to conditions in the City.
ELEMENT These hazards include:
• Seismically induced conditions including ground shaking, surface rupture, ground failure, tsunami, seiche, and dam failure
• Slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides • Subsidence, liquefaction, and other geologic hazards
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-1
P
u
B
L
AM
S
A
F
E
T
Y
• Flooding
• Wild land and urban fires
• Evacuation routes
State law also allows communities to address additional safety issues.
The following additional issues are addressed in the Element:
• Criminal activities
• Hazardous materials
• Nuclear hazards from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
The Public Safety Element must be consistent with the other General Plan elements, and most closely relates to the Land Use and Circulation Elements. Potential hazards are identified and action programs established in the Public Safety Element to avoid or mitigate public safety hazards associated with planned development.
The Land Use Element contains policies to ensure that
environmental conditions, including hazards, are considered in all land use decisions. The distribution of residential and other sensitive land uses on the Land Use Policy Map is designed to avoid areas where hazardous conditions have been identified.
Evacuation routes utilizing the City circulation system are also described in the Public Safety Element. The provision of viable evacuation routes within the City is inextricably linked to the planned circulation system described in the Circulation Element.
RELATED PLANS There is a complex body of State and federal legislation relating to the AND PROGRAMS protection of public health and safety and environmental resources.
The following section briefly summarizes related legislation that guides City decision -making with regard to land use and physical development.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was adopted by the State legislature in response to a public mandate for a thorough environmental analysis of projects that might adversely affect the environment. Provisions of the law, required procedures, and any subsequent analysis are described in the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines. Safety hazards are recognized as environmental impacts under CEQA.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-2
Continued implementation of CEQA will ensure that City officials and the general public have information describing assessment and mitigation of potentially significant safety impacts associated with private and public development projects.
ALQLIIST-PRIOLO EARTHQUAKE FAULT ZONING ACT
The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act requires the State Geologist to identify earthquake fault zones along traces of both recently and potentially active major faults. Cities and counties that contain such zones must inform the public regarding the location of these zones, which are usually one -quarter mile or less in width.
Proposed development plans within these earthquake fault zones must be accompanied by a geotechnical report prepared by a qualified geologist describing the likelihood of surface rupture.
SEISMIC HAZARDS MAPPING ACT
The purpose of the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act (Public Resources Code Section 2690, et. seq.) is to reduce the threat to public safety and minimize the loss of life and property by identifying and mitigating seismic hazards. The Act directs the State Geologist to identify and map areas prone to earthquake hazards of liquefaction, earthquake -induced landslides and amplified ground shaking, and requires site -specific geotechnical investigations to be conducted identifying the hazard and formulating mitigation measures prior to permitting most developments designed for human occupancy within Zones of Required Investigation.
COBEY-ALQLIIST FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT ACT
The Cobey-Alquist Floodplain Management Act encourages local governments to plan, adopt, and enforce land use regulations for floodplain management, in order to protect people and property from flooding hazards. The Act also identifies requirements which jurisdictions must meet in order to receive State financial assistance for flood control.
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP)
Temecula participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which is administered by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA). NFIP provides federal flood
insurance and federally financed loans for property owners in flood prone areas. To qualify for federal flood insurance, the City must
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-3
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
P
u
B
L
S
A
F
E
T
Y
identify flood hazard areas and implement a system of protective P controls.
u
B R WERSIDE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
L Developed pursuant to the Tanner Act (AB 2948), the Riverside I County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP) identifies C current and projected future hazardous waste generation and management needs throughout the County. The HWMP provides a framework for the development of facilities to manage hazardous S wastes, i.e. facility siting criteria. The HWMP also includes a A Households Hazardous Waste Element that is designed to divert F household hazardous wastes from the County's landfills.
E The County HWMP addresses only those hazardous waste issues T with which local governments have responsibilities, namely land use Y decisions. The County and cities are required to implement facility siting policies and criteria within local planning and permitting processes. The City is required to take one of three actions:
• Adopt a City hazardous waste management plan
• Incorporate by reference all applicable portions of the County Plan into its General Plan
• Enact an ordinance requiring all applicable land use
permitting and decisions to be consistent with the siting criteria set forth in the County HWMP
The City has adopted by reference the applicable portions of the County HWMP.
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SONGS)
The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) is located near the southern boundary of Orange County, approximately 25 miles west of Temecula. SONGS is a jointly owned enterprise among Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas and Electric, and the cities of Riverside and Anaheim. For hazard mitigation purposes, the federal and State governments have created three levels of emergency zones surrounding nuclear facilities:
• Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ): The federal government requires that communities within approximately 10 miles of a nuclear power plant be included in an EPZ. Within this zone, specific emergency protective plans have been developed.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-4
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
• Public Education Zone (PEZ): The State of California has defined a broader area between 10 to 20 miles from a plant as P
a PEZ. Within this zone, the public is informed on
u
preparedness plans. The distance from the plant, however, B
would make evacuation highly unlikely.
L
• Ingestion Pathway Zone JPZ): Temecula is located within I
this zone which covers the areas within 50 miles of SONGS.
C
The purpose of this zone is to prevent the accidental
ingestion of deposited radioactive materials by humans and S
livestock. Southern California Edison, who operates
SONGS, will provide notification to all affected jurisdictions A
within 15 minutes of declaration of any emergency.
F
E
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE MULTI JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD
MmGATIoN PLAN (MJLHMP) AND TEMECLILA LOCAL HAZARD
T
MITIGATION PLAN (LHMP)
Y
The County of Riverside Multi Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJLHMP) was adopted in 2018. The purpose of the MJLHMP is to identify the County's hazards, review and assess past disaster occurrences, estimate the probability of future occurrences and set goals to mitigate potential risks to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from natural and man-made hazards.
While the County is responsible for preparing and adopting the MJLHMP, the City of Temecula is responsible for preparing and adopting the annex to the County's plan — more specifically, the 2017 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex (LHMP). The planning process evaluated the potential impact of each identified hazard on the county, cities, special districts, and tribes. All participating jurisdictions helped establish a list of potential mitigation efforts (via their LHMP Annex) and prioritized those efforts based on the needs of their jurisdiction. In addition, each participating jurisdiction developed a specific hazard mitigation strategy based on information from 2012 through 2017.
CITY OF TEMECULA CODES
The City has adopted the California Building Code, California Mechanical Code, Uniform Fire Code, the National Electrical Code and other related codes that contain structural requirements for existing and new buildings. The codes are designed to ensure structure integrity during seismic and other hazardous events and to prevent personal injury, loss of life and substantial property damage.
To protect the public, planned development in Temecula is subject to these structural codes.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-5
P
u
B
L
r
A
S
A
F
E
T
Y
RIVER -SIDE COUNTY CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
The County of Riverside approved an update to their CAP in 2019.
The 2019 CAP Update builds upon the GHG reduction strategies in the 2015 Climate Action Plan and refines the County's efforts to meet greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction strategies, specifically for the years 2035 and 2050. It also includes measures to prepare for potential climate -related impacts and to comply with state and federal legislation, including Gov. Code § 65302(g)(4)(C). Climate -related impacts are not stand-alone hazards but may change the frequency and intensity of the other hazards. The CAP provides resources, information, and strategies to reduce these impacts, resulting in overall risk reduction.
PUBLIC SAFETY PLAN
As in all communities, human activities and natural conditions occurring in Temecula have an effect on residents' quality of life.
Providing an environment where businesses and residents can prosper and feel safe, and being prepared for emergency situations are essential. The City can minimize hazards and protect public health and private property through emergency preparedness planning.
NATURAL Natural hazards addressed in the Public Safety Element include HAZARDS seismic, geologic, flood, dam failure and wild land fire hazards.
SEISMIC HAZARDS
The Elsinore fault traverses the City, which has historically experienced earthquakes of moderate magnitude (See Figure PS-1).
The Elsinore fault zone is one of the largest in southern California, and in historical times, has been one of the quietest. The southeastern extension of the Elsinore fault zone, the Laguna Salada fault, ruptured in 1892 in a magnitude 7.0 earthquake, but the main trace of the Elsinore fault zone has only seen one historical event greater than magnitude 5.2--the magnitude 6.0 earthquake of 1910 near Temescal Valley, which produced no known surface rupture and did little damage. Other faults surrounding Temecula include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, San Gabriel, Newport -Inglewood, Sierra Madre -Santa Susana-Cucamonga, Rose Canyon, Coronado Banks, San Diego Trough and San Clemente Island faults.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-6
f'
u
B
L
9 S
A
F
E
T
Y
i
f4�Y
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
Ps-7
PLANS IN ACTION
PProposed development projects
uin the Elsinore fault Zone
B require evaluation and a
aunt --ten report specific to the
L, site, prepared by a licensed
Igeologist. Structures for
human occupancy cannot be
Cplaced over the fault and
must be set back from the
S fault (generally 50 feet).
A
F
E
T
Y
PLANS IN ACTION
The only remaining URM
structure in Old Town, the
Temecula Merchant&
Building (1902), has been
retrofitted to meet current
seismic safety standards.
Fault Rupture. The Elsinore fault
zone is an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zone, governed by specific State
development criteria designed to
prevent damage associated with ground surface rupture. Structures intended for human occupancy are not permitted on an active fault.
Before a project can be permitted, the City requires a geologic investigation to demonstrate that proposed buildings will not be constructed across the fault.
Ground Shaking. Severe ground shaking is possible in Temecula due to the presence of loosely consolidated alluvial soils. Ground shaking causes structural damage, and is the major cause of soil instability hazards, such as liquefaction, subsidence, or slope failure.
Riverside County has established Ground Shaking Zones indicating the relative level of risk based on distance from faults and geologic characteristics of an area. Development proposals are evaluated using guidelines, which indicate the suitability of locating land uses in various ground shaking zones. The Temecula Planning Area is located in Ground Shaking Zone Il, where shaking is expected to vary from moderate to intense levels in the event of an earthquake, depending on the composition of underlying geologic formations, the earthquake's epicenter, and the order of magnitude of the seismic event.
Unreinforced masonry (URM) structures and adobe block
construction are particularly susceptible to failure and/or collapse during an earthquake. New structures conforming to California Building Code standards can withstand ground shaking with little or no structural damage. Older buildings can also be retrofitted to improve structural integrity. To identify structures most prone to failure, the City conducted a seismic inventory of structures in Old Town, where buildings are least likely to be able to withstand moderate ground shaking.
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
Ground shaking following an earthquake leads to other potential geologic hazards such as liquefaction, landslides, and subsidence.
The potential for these hazards depends upon the severity of ground shaking and underlying geologic conditions. Temecula is subject to the following potential geologic hazards.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-8
PLANS IN ACTION
California lazy requires
disclosure of Liquefaction,
Landslide, and Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault
.Zones as a part of all real
estate transactions within
identified areas.
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
Liquefaction. The potential for liquefaction in an area is a function of soil type and depth of groundwater. Poorly consolidated soils P
combine with groundwater during an earthquake, losing their shear u
strength and taking on the properties of a heavy liquid. This process, B
termed liquefaction, can result in the loss of foundation support, L
ground failure due to lateral spreading, and settlement of affected soils. Three general conditions must be met for liquefaction to occur:
I
(1) strong ground shaking of relatively long duration; (2) loose, or C
unconsolidated, recently deposited sediments consisting primarily of silty sand and sand; and (3) water saturated sediments within about 50 feet of the surface.
S
A
As shown in Figure PS-1, there is a possibility that liquefaction could F
occur in the Temecula area, particularly along Santa Gertrudis and Temecula Creeks. California law requires identification of E
Liquefaction Zones where the stability of foundation soils must be T
investigated, and countermeasures undertaken in the design and Y
construction of buildings for human occupancy.
Landslides. Slope stability is related to a variety of factors including steepness; strength of geologic materials to resist the downward pull of gravity; characteristics of bedding planes, joints and faults; surface and ground water conditions; and other factors. Landslides are most likely to occur on hillside locations where rock strata parallels surface slopes, high clay content absorbs excess water, displacement has fractured a fault zone, or the base of a slope has been removed.
Although no recent landslides have occurred in the area, potential landslide conditions exist in hillside areas in southwest Temecula where existing slopes are greater than 15 percent (see Figure PS-1).
California law requires identification of Landslide Zones where the stability of hill slopes must be evaluated, and countermeasures undertaken in the design and construction of buildings for human occupancy.
Subsidence. Subsidence occurs when earth material shrinks due to natural or artificial removal of underlying support. This process occurs in poor, unconsolidated soils and poorly
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-9
P
u
B
L
r
AM
S
A
F
E
T
Y
PLANS IN ACTION
The City enforces State
seismic design guidelines and
building codes, works with
property owners to
rehabilitate ha.Zardous
buildings, and will prepare
new hillside development
standards.
PLANS IN ACTION
Specific building standards,
described in the food damage
prevention and foodplain
management regulations
within the City Development
Code, apply to food prone
areas, including anchoring
use of flood resistant building
materials, use of adequate
drainage paths, and elevating
the structure to or above the
base food elevation.
compacted fill areas. The potential for subsidence exists along Santa Gertrudis and Temecula Creeks.
Erosion. The underlying surficial geology in Temecula is predominantly composed of well -drained fine sandy loams, sandy loams and gravelly silt loams. Soils characterized by low permeability or high runoff are susceptible to erosion. Additionally, the well - drained alluvium surfaces are susceptible to wind erosion.
The City will enact programs to reduce geologic hazards and protect public safety. To minimize hazards resulting from earthquakes, the most recent State seismic guidelines will be implemented for structural design. During the review of development proposals involving steep slopes, grading, unstable soils and other hazardous conditions, surveys of soil and geologic conditions by a state -licensed engineering geologist will be required. Based on the results of the survey, mitigation measures will be incorporated into projects to minimize geologic hazards. The City will take actions to make seismic and geologic hazard mitigation a part of land use planning efforts, such as working with property owners to remediate hazardous buildings, requiring disclosure of hazard zone status as part of real estate transactions, working with County and State agencies to monitor and compile information on seismic hazards, and adopting hillside development standards.
FLOOD HAZARDS
Flood hazards in Temecula can be divided into three categories:
natural flooding, dam failure, and mud debris flows.
Natural Flooding. Figure PS-2
identifies areas of potential flood hazards
within the Planning Area. Temecula
contains several FEMA Special Flood
Hazard Areas (SFHAs). These areas,
corresponding to the 100-year floodplain,
have the potential to become flooded
when major rainstorms cause stream
overflows. Murrieta Creek is the most
flood -prone of the Temecula creeks.
However, Temecula Creek, Pechanga
Creek,
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-10
1'
Ll
B
L
r
m
S
A
F
F
T
Y
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-11
Tucalota Creek, Long Valley Wash, and Santa Gertrudis Creek could P also be subjected to flooding.
u
B Dam Failure. Flooding from dam failure can result from natural L and human causes including earthquakes, erosion, improper siting and/or design and rapidly rising floodwater during heavy storms.
I The type of failure, ranging from instantaneous to gradual, is C dependent on the building material of the dam. Dam failure can potentially cause loss of life and property damage. Other effects include displacement of persons residing in the inundation path and S damage to infrastructure.
A
F Three dams are located in areas surrounding Temecula:
E • Lake Skinner is a 43,800-acre feet earthen dam located T northeast of Temecula. Failure of the Lake Skinner Dam Y would result in flooding along Tucalota Creek and Benton Road.
• Vail Lake is located to the east of Temecula. Dam failure of this 51,000-acre foot facility would cause flooding in the Pauba and Temecula Valleys. Interstate 15 and an adjacent 3- mile area would also flood.
• Diamond Valley Lake, impounded by two earthen dams, is the largest reservoir in Southern California and is located north of Temecula. Failure of the western dam would result in flooding in the northern parts of the Planning Area.
The failure of Lake Skinner or Diamond Valley Lake could also result in substantial flooding along parts of Santa Gertrudis and Warm Springs Creeks. Areas along I-15 and Murrieta Creek could also be substantially affected.
Mud and Debris Flows. Mud and debris flows originate in hillside areas characterized by deep topsoil and/or poor drainage. The potential for mud and debris flows exists in the hilly southern and western portions of Temecula.
The City will continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which makes flood insurance available to affected property owners within the 100-year floodplain. The City will also review development plans for
C 1 T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-12
PLANS IN ACTION projects within the floodplain, to ensure compliance with City and Temecula participates in the FEMA floodplain development requirements. No development of AFIP, enforces Development any kind will be allowed in the floodway portion of the 100-year Code regulations regarding floodplain. The City will maintain a Dam Inundation Evacuation development in the floodplain Plan, will update the Multi -Hazard Functional Plan as needed to and floodway, and maintains address flood hazards, and will coordinate with the State Office of a dam inundation evacuation Emergency Services to ensure that dam safety plans reflect the level plan. of development within the community.
FIRE HAZARDS
Temecula is subject to both natural and urban fires. The Planning Area is surrounded by rolling foothills and mountains subject to potential natural wild land fires. The Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD), through a cooperative agreement, provides fire protection, fire prevention, and emergency medical rescue services in the City of Temecula. Five fire stations are located within the City limits, and the Temecula Division encompasses three Riverside County Fire Department stations for a total of eight stations within the Temecula Division. Mutual Aid agreements with county, state, and federal government agencies further allow the City, and any other participating agency, to request additional resources depending on the complexity and needs of a given incident, such as wildfires.
Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
The State has charged CAL
FIRE with the identification of
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
(FHSZ) within State
Responsibility Areas. In
addition, CAL FIRE must
recommend draft Very High
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
(VHFHSZ) identified within any Local Responsibility Areas. The FHSZ maps are used by the State Fire Marshall as a basis for the adoption of applicable building code standards. The Planning Area includes both Local Responsibility Areas and State Responsibility Areas (within the Sphere of Influence), with portions of both Local and State Responsibility Areas being designated as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Figure PS-3 shows Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Temecula.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-13
lam^` 'I��\l\\'�� �•j1.
P
u
B
L
S
A
F
E
T
Y
P
u
B
L
AM
S
A
F
E
T
Y
Major Wildland Fires in Temecula. Due to the dry weather in Temecula, brush fires are more common on hot days. In August 2012, Aguanga fires invaded a community nearby Temecula and the City became the evacuation center for many of the individuals that had to evacuate. Emergency response personnel and local residents were frightened at the possibility that the fire may reach the City of Temecula. The fire burned 3,000 acres within 10 hours. This fire was difficult to contain. August, one of the hottest months for Southern California, assisted the fire expansion. Incidents such as this have been common throughout the years.
Smaller fires also caused a big disruption in the City as well. The City has endured many small brush fires that start on the hillsides that run parallel to the freeway that cause traffic jams. Many of these fires are controlled in a timely manner because of Cal Fire.
Wild Land Fires. Fire in undeveloped areas results from the ignition of accumulated brush and vegetation. The most critical times of year for wildland fires are late summer and fall when Santa Ana winds bring hot, dry desert air into the region. The air temperature quickly dries vegetation, thereby increasing the amount of natural fuel. Development pressures increase the threat of wildland fire on human populations and property as development pushes to the fringes of major forests and brush areas. Increased human presence in wildland areas likewise increases the potential for human -induced wildland fires.
Urban Fires. The predominant land use in the Temecula area is low density residential development. The area has experienced rapid development in past decades, and this trend is expected to continue.
As the number of structures increases, so does the incidence of fire.
Building conditions that affect fire control include: type and use of structure; area of building; number of stories; roof covering materials; and adjacent uses.
Certain development patterns pose more difficult fire problems.
These include: multi -story, wood frame, high density apartment development; large continuous developed areas with combustible roofing materials; and facilities that use and/or store hazardous materials. Several older residential tracts in the City feature wood shake roofs, which increase the potential for both ignition and spread of fire.
C 1 T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-14
The State of Cliff—ia and the DepadmerR of Forestry and Fire Protection make no representations ranties r,g,Ning he aauracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Dep-- shall be liable under any circumstances for any dired, special, incidental, or wnsequential damages with resped to any claim by any user or hud pady on acwunt of, or arising from, the use of data or maps.
Obtain FRAP mans. data, metadata and
Arnold Sch—nagger, Governor.
State of California
Mike C-I R . Secretary for Naturel Resources.
The Natural Resources Agency
Del Walters, Dl
Depadment d F—M Forestry and Fire Prdedlon
Temecula
MAP ID: FHSZL 03 Temewla
DATASOURCES
P
u
B
PLANS IN ACTION
LThe
Fire Department reviews
Idevelopment
plans to be sure
Cnew
structures are safe, and
conducts public education and
outreach activities. The City
Salso
works closely with local
A
water districts to ensure water
pressure is adequate for fire
Ffighting
purposes.
E
T
HUMAN ACTIVTIY
Y
HAZARDS
PLANS IN ACTION
The City participates in the
Riverside County Household
Hazardous Waste (HHW)
collection program in
accordance with the
California Integrated Solid
Waste Management Act of
1989. County
Environmental Health
(EH) personnel, in
conjunction with the Fire
Department, respond to
ha.Zardous materials
incidents, and assist County
District Attorney to
investigate environmental
crimes and respond to illegal
ha.Zardous waste disposal
complaints.
C I T Y O F
Areas posing a significant risk to the City are subject to the California Public Resources Code, Sections 4291-4299, which require property owners to conduct periodic maintenance to reduce the fire danger.
The City will continue to reduce the potential for dangerous fires by coordinating with the RCFD to conduct fire hazard education, and administer fire protection and fuel modification programs. The current Uniform Fire Code will be used to prevent structural fire hazards.
Human activity hazards addressed in the Safety Plan include hazardous materials and nuclear power production.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Hazardous materials are used in Temecula for a variety of purposes, including service industries, small businesses, schools and households. Many chemicals used in household cleaning,
construction, dry cleaning, film processing, landscaping, and automotive maintenance and repair are considered hazardous.
Accidents can also occur in the production, use, transport and disposal of hazardous waste.
In order to effectively manage hazardous materials and wastes, the City implements applicable portions of the Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP). Both the federal and State governments require all businesses that handle more than a specified amount of hazardous materials to submit an annual business plan to the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). The CUPA with responsibility for the City of Temecula is the Riverside County Environmental Health Department.
The City will work to minimize accidents and health risks from hazardous materials using the following approaches:
T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-16
lam^` 'I��\l\\'�� �•j1.
• Cooperate with federal, State, and County agencies to effectively regulate the management of hazardous materials P and waste. u
B
• Amend project applications to include requirements for L submittal of hazardous waste information.
I
• Establish roadway transportation routes for conveyance of C hazardous materials.
• Cooperate with the Certified United Program Agency S
(CUPA) for Temecula (the Riverside County Environmental A Health Department) and the Riverside County Fire F
Department to administer risk management plans for E
businesses within the City. T
• Implement the Multi -Hazard Functional Plan for accidents Y involving hazardous materials.
NUCLEAR POWER PRODUCTION
The San Onofre Nuclear Generating System (SONGS) is located on the Camp Pendleton U.S. Marine Corps Base in San Diego County, approximately 25 miles west of Temecula. SONGS operations are regulated by FEMA and the California Office of Emergency Services (OES). An Interjurisdictional Planning Committee JPC), comprised of several local jurisdictions, was established to coordinate emergency response plans.
SONGS byproducts are radioactive,
with the exception of small
quantities of radioactive gas released
into the air and liquids into the
Pacific Ocean. The releases are
monitored by SONGS personnel.
According to SONGS, radiation
exposure due to material releases is
less than the typical exposure from
natural background radiation. The two most likely sources of radiation contamination are incidents involving transport of radioactive materials, and uncontrolled releases at the plant site.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-17
P
u
B
L
r
A
S
A
F
E
T
Y
PLANS IN ACTION
Temecula's Multi -Hazard
Functional Plan provides
strategies to deal with
potential emergencies related
to SONGS.
SAFETY AND
SEcuury
PLANS IN ACTION
llhen property owners
present development
proposals, the City encourages
the use of crime preventive
defensible space and lighting
concepts to deter crime.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has identified the area surrounding every nuclear generating station as an Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ). The State of California has defined the area outside, and adjacent to the EPZ as a Public Education Zone (PEZ).
The federal government establishes the area with a 50-mile radius around every nuclear generating station as an Ingestion Pathway Zone JPZ).
The Temecula planning area is located within the IPZ of the San Onofre Station. Education programs coordinated by the State and Southern California Edison are administered in this zone to ensure that residents are prepared for any potential problems associated with the facility.
Criminal activity in Temecula is
lower than in some other parts
of Riverside County. Protecting
residents and businesses from
criminal activity is a priority in
Temecula. Police protection is
provided by the Riverside
County Sheriff's Department
(RCSD). Temecula has three
store -front office locations (Old Town Temecula, Promenade Mall, and Temecula Town Center). The City will ensure that contracted staffing levels are compatible with the City population and needs.
Crime prevention programs include police services for residents and businesses, and citizen -based volunteer programs and patrols.
EMERGENCY Many natural and man-made events and processes carry the risk of PREPAREDNESS hazard to life and property. Natural hazards arise from a community's AND HAZARD many physical relationships to the natural environment. Hazard risk also results from human -caused intentional acts and disruption or MITIGATION failure of technology. A resilient community has the capacity to maintain critical functions during hazard events as well as adapt to and reduce future hazard risks.
Hazard mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to life and property from hazard events. An effective response to natural and human -caused disasters requires planning, education, coordination and training by multiple government agencies and the public.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-18
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
CLIMATE ADAPTATION
P
Riverside County's 2019 Climate Action Plan (CAP) provides an u updated greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory, as well as measures to B reduce GHG emissions, prepare for potential climate -related impacts, L and to comply with state and federal legislation, including Gov. Code § 65302(g)(4)(C).. Some degree of climate change will occur I regardless of the City's effort to reduce and mitigate greenhouse gas C emissions. The City will need to adapt to these changes within the context of the community's environmental and socioeconomic S system.
A
Forecasted effects to Riverside County from climate change include F increased temperatures and precipitation extremes (i.e., more severe E periods of drought and flooding). Exposure to these events can leave a community vulnerable to an increased rate of wildland fires, T flooding, reduced air quality, availability of fresh water, and negative Y impacts on wildlife. All of these effects can potentially generate multiple concomitant effects on public health and safety.
The State requires local jurisdictions to integrate climate adaption into the general plan to support the State's overall climate adaption strategy. The City will develop climate resiliency and adaptation strategies and work with stakeholders on amendments to relevant planning documents to address this issue.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING
Local Emergency Preparedness Plans serve as extensions of the California Emergency Plan and the Emergency Resource
Management Plan. The City has an adopted LHMP as part of the County's MJLHMP to ensure the effective management of City personnel and resources in responding to emergency situations stemming from natural disasters, technological incidents, and nuclear defense emergencies.
The plan includes a responsibility matrix that delineates specific responsibilities to City departments or personnel in the event of an emergency. The plan also includes a comprehensive hazard analysis that addresses the following potential hazards: earthquake, hazardous material incident, flooding, dam failure, major fire/wildfire, nuclear incident, and transportation incident.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-19
P
u
B
L
r
L�
S
A
F
E
T
Y
PLANS IN ACTION
The Fire and Police
Departments educate
residents and businesses
about appropriate act -ions to
safeguard life and propery
during and after emergencies
through distribution of
brochures, presentations to
civic groups, and instruction
in local schools.
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
The LHMP and MJHMP provide general guidelines for evacuation routes in the event of a natural or human -caused disaster. Due to the unpredictability of the impact of a disaster on streets and highways, appropriate evacuation routes cannot be pre -determined. In general, all traffic will be channeled to the nearby freeways, state highways, and other major arterials. I-15 will serve as the primary north -south evacuation channel. Winchester and Rancho California Roads will be used for east -west evacuation.
The City prepared an analysis consistent with Senate Bill 99 to identify residential developments in hazard areas that do not have at least two emergency evacuation routes. The analysis identified six residential areas of concern in high hazard zones that warrant further study and coordination with the Riverside County Fire Department.
While all residential developments meet City standards, the City will continue to coordinate with RCFD and RCSD to provide ongoing education to residents about how to safely evacuate in the event of an emergency A White Paper describing the methodology used to map the evacuation routes is included as an Appendix to the Public Safety Element.
Once the decision to evacuate is made, the public will be alerted and given evacuation instructions by various means, including school alert/monitor receivers, radio and television announcements, sirens, mobile loud speakers, and personal contact.
Educating residents and businesses about potential disasters, the LHMP, and the MJLHMP can increase the effectiveness of response efforts. An educated public will know how to prevent injury and property damage during and after emergencies and also know how to find help.
One important way that residents participate in the City's emergency preparedness program is through the Temecula Citizen's Corps.
Created in 2002, the Corps is a community -based volunteer organization whose goal is to prepare for natural disasters or terrorist activity through coordinated response at the neighborhood level. In the event of an emergency, the Corps will assist the City government by providing assistance in cases where the scale of the incident has overwhelmed conventional emergency services.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-20
TERRORISM In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the READINESS AND City of Temecula's emergency preparedness and response services RESPONSE have become an even more critical function to address terrorism issues that confront the nation and local communities. Since the events of 9/11, a considerable amount of information has been generated on potential vulnerabilities, protective measures, and anti- terrorism/security technologies. The Riverside County Sheriff's and Fire Departments, which currently provide police and fire services to Temecula, recognizes the need not only to learn from the lessons from 9/11, but also to collectively address the terrorism planning and policy issues that most affect Temecula residents. The goals, policies and implementation programs associated with emergency
preparedness also apply to terrorism readiness and response.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-21
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
P
u
B
L
S
A
F
E
T
Y
GOALS AND POLICIES
P
u
Certain natural conditions and human activities in Temecula create B
risks to individuals and properties within the community. Excessive L,
risk from such hazards can be reduced or avoided through I
implementation of policies in the Public Safety Element.
C
The Public Safety Element addresses four major issues, including: 1) reducing risk from natural hazardous conditions; 2) reducing risks S
from hazards associated with human activities; 3) community safety A
and security; and 4) preparing for emergency situations.
F
NATURAL Due to location within a seismically active region and the presence of E
HAZARDS floodplains and hillsides, Temecula is potentially subject to several T
types of natural hazards, including earthquakes, liquefaction, flooding, Y
wild land fires, landslides, and erosion. Potential damage can be reduced through appropriate land use planning, development engineering, and building construction practices.
The Planning Area contains Alquist-Priolo fault zones and County Fault Hazard Zones. These zones identify areas potentially impacted by groundshaking and surface -rupture. Seismic events occurring within and outside of the Planning Area also have the potential to trigger such secondary impacts as liquefaction and subsidence. Other natural hazards impacting the Planning Area include flooding and dam inundation.
Goal 1 Protection from natural hazards associated with
geologic instability, seismic events, wild land
fires, flooding, and dam failures.
Policy 1.1 Identify and mitigate potential adverse impacts of ground surface rupture, liquefaction, and landslides at the project level.
Policy 1.2 Apply and enforce seismic design standards and building construction codes for new development.
Policy 1.3 Work with property owners to remediate hazardous buildings throughout the City.
Policy 1.4 Monitor the potential for seismic events and other geologic activity with the County of Riverside and
California Geological Survey.
C l T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-22
Policy 1.5 Establish development management techniques to lessen the potential for erosion and landslides.
Policy 1.6 Provide and maintain adequate flood control facilities and limit development within the 100-year floodplain
and potential dam inundation areas.
Policy 1.7 Prohibit development of any kind within the floodway portion of the 100-year floodplain.
Policy 1.8 Require new development in SRAs or VHFHSZs to be located, designed, and constructed to minimize the
risk of loss resulting from fires through:
• minimizing development in SRAs or VHFHSZs
when feasible;
• imposition of site -specific development standards
during project review, including fire safe design,
fire protection plans, sufficient ingress/egress,
evacuation routes, emergency vehicle access,
defensible space, visible home addressing and
signage, and fuel modification zones;
• coordination with the City Fire Department and
other organizations; and
• evaluating re -development after a large fire.
Policy 1.9 Reduce the risk of wildfire hazards by working with Homeowner Associations, Business Park
Associations, and other property owners and RCFD
to maintain fire retardant landscaping and buffer
zones, community fire breaks, and private road and
public road clearance in areas of high wildfire risk.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-23
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
P
u
B
L
S
A
F
E
T
Y
HUMAN- The transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials and the P
CAUSED education and planning regarding nuclear power production are u
HAZARDS important environmental planning issues in Temecula. Modern B
technology and society's high standard of living has led to dependence on these products and necessitates adequate
L
management of materials and waste and education regarding hazards I
within the City. The intent is to avoid damage to people, property C
and environmental resources.
Goal Protection of the public and environmental
S
resources from hazards related to hazardous
A
materials and waste, and nuclear power
F
production.
E
Policy 2.1 Minimize the risks associated with hazardous T
materials through careful land use planning and
Y
coordination with responsible federal, State, and
County agencies.
Policy 2.2 Participate in local and regional programs that facilitate the proper disposal of household hazardous
waste.
Policy 2.3 The policies and programs of the current Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP)
are hereby adopted by reference.
Policy 2.4 Coordinate with local, State and federal agencies to reduce the risks related to nuclear power production.
Policy 2.5 Reduce potential hazards associated with airplane accidents by ensuring compliance of proposed
development projects with the risk contours
contained in the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
(ALUCP) for French Valley Airport.
C l T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-24
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
SAFETY AND The perception of personal safety and the security of property are P SECURTIY central to the quality of life in a community. Realizing these u objectives requires both proactive and reactive involvement by B citizens, as well as fire and law enforcement personnel. The risk of L exposure to criminal activity or fire can be reduced through planning, education and regulation of human activity, and by providing paved I road access throughout the City. In addition, the design and effective C use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in fear and the incidence of both crime and fire, improving the quality of life, and helping create a secure sense of community. S
A
Goal 3 A safe and secure community free from the threat F of personal injury and loss of property. E
Policy 3.1 Ensure adequate facilities and police and fire service T personnel are provided in the City. Y
Policy 3.2 Continue to work with the community in operating citizen involved programs and patrols that promote
mutual assistance and crime prevention activities
among residents.
Policy 3.3 Incorporate crime prevention and defensible space into site plans and building designs for new
development.
Policy 3.4 Ensure that all-weather and appropriate secondary access is provided to ensure timely emergency
response. Require all residential development with 35
or more dwelling units to provide all-weather
secondary access that meets City standards.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-25
EMERGENCY Major emergencies occur periodically in all communities. Timely and P PREPAREDNESS coordinated action by agencies charged with responsibilities in the u AND HAZARD event of a disaster is necessary to mitigate the effect of a disaster on B the human population and environment. Preventive measures and MITIGATION preparatory responses before an emergency occurs will hasten L recovery.
I
C Goal 4 An effective response of emergency services.
S Policy 4.1 Provide for and maintain a coordinated emergency services response to reduce community risks and
A property damage in the event of a disaster.
F Policy 4.2 Support the development and implementation of local E preparedness plans and multi -jurisdictional
Tcooperation for emergency situations consistent with
Y the Standardized Emergency Management System
(SEMS).
Policy 4.3 Coordinate emergency response planning with
Riverside County and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA).
Policy 4.4 Encourage community -wide emergency preparedness among City residents and the business community.
Policy 4.5 Regulate the location of critical facilities to ensure they continue to function after a disaster. Locate,
when feasible, new essential public facilities outside of very high fire hazard severity zones, including but not limited to, hospitals and health care facilities,
emergency shelters, emergency command centers, and
emergency communication facilities, or identify
construction methods or other methods to minimize
damage if these facilities are located in very high fire hazard severity zones.
Policy 4.6 Discourage the closure of streets that limit or delay access for emergency services.
Policy 4.7 Coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies to evaluate the capacity, safety, and viability of
evacuation routes under a range of emergency
scenarios, and update plans as necessary.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-26
lam^` 'I��\1\\'�� �•j1.
Goal 5 A resilient, sustainable, and equitable community where risks to life, property, the economy, and
the environment resulting from climate change,
including extreme weather events, are
minimized.
P
u
B
L
Policy 5.1 Collaborate with local, regional, state and/or federal I
C
jurisdictions and agencies on climate resiliency and
adaptation strategies.
S
Policy 5.2 Monitor climate change -related effects with local, A
regional, state, and/or federal partners to provide
F
information of effectiveness of existing infrastructure E
and programs.
T
Y
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS
The following Implementation Programs provide actions to implement Public Safety Element goals and policies.
PS-1 Reduce the risk to the community from hazards related to geologic NATURAL conditions, seismic activity, wild land fires, and flooding by requiring HAZARDS KISK feasible mitigation of such impacts on existing development, new development, and reuse projects. Assess development proposals for REDUCTION potential hazards pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Require measures to mitigate all identified significant public safety hazards. Address the following issues in the assessment:
• Steep slopes, unstable geologic materials and faulting; • Flooding;
• Wild land and structural fires and adequacy of water pressure for fire fighting;
• Hazardous materials use, transport, storage or disposal; and • Mitigate existing non -conforming development to
contemporary fire safe standards, in terms of road standards and vegetative hazard.
Agency/Department:
Related Policies:
Planning, Building & Safety, Public Works
1. 1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-27
IN
u PS-2 To minimize damage from earthquakes and other geologic activity, STRUCTURAL implement most recent and most stringent California and Uniform B DESIGN Building Code seismic requirements for structural design for new L, development and reuse projects.
I Agency/Department: Planning, Building & Safety
C Related Policy: 1.2
S
A PS-3 During review of development and reuse proposals, require surveys SOIL AND of soil and geologic conditions by State licensed Engineering F Geologists and Civil Engineers where appropriate. Examples of E GEOLOGIC when these surveys are required are:
-I- SURVEYS
Y • Prior to the development of any area with slopes more than 10 feet high at a gradient equal to or steeper than 2:1; • Projects located within a State -delineated Seismic Hazard Zone for liquefaction or seismically -induced landsliding, in accordance with the California Geological Survey; or,
• Projects located within an Earthquake Fault Zone or within 150 feet of an active or potentially active fault.
If potential for fault displacement or liquefaction exists on the site, structures for human occupancy may not be placed there unless the seismic hazard is mitigated to an acceptable level.
Agency/Department: Public Works, Planning, Building & Safety Related Policy: 1.1
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-28
PS-4 Implement the following actions to ensure that the land use planning LAND USE and real estate processes fully account for the presence of seismic PLANNING AND hazards in Temecula.
NOTIFICATION • Require that any person selling property within a delineated Earthquake Fault Zone, Liquefaction Zone, or Landslide
Zone disclose this fact to any prospective purchaser.
• Work with the County of Riverside and California Geological Survey to monitor and compile information on faults within the Temecula Planning Area.
• Update the City's listing of hazardous unreinforced masonry buildings periodically. Provide technical assistance and funding to remediate these structures, as available.
• Develop a Land Use Suitability Matrix for Special Studies and County Fault Hazards Zones. The Matrix will categorize land uses according to risk and develop restrictions for these uses in zones.
Agency/Department: Planning, Building & Safety, Public Works Related Policies: 1.1, 1.3, 1.4
Required by General Plan EIR
PS-5 Prepare and adopt hillside development standards for site HILLSIDE development and drainage that work to control runoff for erosion DEVELOPMENT control and water quality purposes. Require geotechnical STANDARDS investigations for areas of known or suspected geologic hazards.
Agency/Department: Planning, Public Works
Related Policy: 1.5
Required by General Plan EIR
PS-6 Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program FLOOD (NFIP) administered through the Federal Emergency Management INSURANCE Agency (FEMA). The NFIP program provides federal flood insurance subsidies and federally financed loans for property owners in flood -prone areas.
Agency/Department: Public Works, Planning, Building & Safety Related Policies: 1.6, 1.7
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-29
P
u
B
L
r
A
S
A
F
E
T
Y
PS-7 Mitigate flood hazards in Temecula by:
MITIGATE FLOOD
HAZARDS • Reviewing development proposals for projects within FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas for consistency with City flood damage prevention and floodplain management regulations and FEMA requirements.
• Prohibiting development of any kind within the floodway portion of the 100-year floodplain.
• Maintaining a Dam Inundation Evacuation Plan as part of the Multi -Hazard Functional Plan.
• Coordinating planning projections with the Office of
Emergency Services to ensure that dam safety plans reflect development in the community.
Agency/Department: Public Works, Planning, Building & Safety Related Policies: 1.6, 1.7
PS-8 Promote fire prevention in Temecula in the following ways:
PROMOTE FIRE
PREVENTION • Work closely with the Fire Department to implement fire hazard education and fire prevention programs, including information about defensible space or evacuation routes. • Work with the Fire Department to provide adequate
infrastructure for water supply and fire flow in new and existing developments and establish fire prevention and mitigation measures in wild land fire hazard areas.
• Expand and improve vegetation management efforts in wild land fire hazard areas.
• Coordinate with the local water districts and Fire Department to ensure that water pressure for urban areas and sites to be developed is adequate for fire fighting purposes.
• Adopt and implement California Fire Code provisions and appropriate amendments to reflect Temecula's topography, vegetation, and urban form.
• Support public education, information, fire prevention and fire law enforcement programs conducted by the Fire
Department, with an emphasis on reaching at -risk
populations.
• Support programs and plans, such as Strategic Fire Plans, consistent with state law that require fuel
management/modification within established defensible
space boundaries and when strategic fuel modification is necessary outside of defensible space, balance fuel
management needs to protect structures with the
preservation of native vegetation and sensitive habitats.
C l T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-30
Agency/Department: Fire, Planning
Related Policy: 1.8
PS-9 Minimize public health and environmental risks from the use, REDUCE RISKS transport, storage and disposal of hazardous materials through the FROM following actions:
HAZARDOUS • Cooperate with federal, State, and local agencies to effectively MATERIALS regulate the management of hazardous materials and waste. • Amend project applications to include requirements for submittal of information involving the proposed use, storage, handling, transport and/or disposal of hazardous
materials/wastes and any previous use, storage, handling and/or disposal of such materials/wastes.
• Cooperate with the County of Riverside to implement
applicable portions of the County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan (HWMP) and the Hazardous Materials
Area Plan (HMAP), as well as to maintain an inventory of facilities that store, handle, or transport hazardous materials. • Establish transportation routes for the conveyance of hazardous materials. Transportation of hazardous materials shall be restricted through residential areas and arterials during peak hours.
• Implement the Multi -Hazard Functional Plan for accidents involving hazardous materials.
Agency/Department: Planning, Public Works, Building &
Safety, Fire
Related Policies: 2.1, 2.3
PS-10 Support efforts by the County Household Hazardous Waste Program HOUSEHOLD to protect residents from dangers resulting from the use, transport HAZARDOUS and disposal of hazardous materials used in the home. The program includes public education about health and environmental hazards of WASTE PROGRAM household hazardous materials and periodic collection campaigns at established sites.
Agency/Department: Community Services, County
Environmental Health Department
Related Policy: 2.2
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-31
P
u
B
L
r
A
S
A
F
E
T
Y
PS-11
NUCLEAR POWER.
PRODUCTION
RISKS
REDUCTION
PS-12
MINIMIZE
CRIMINAL
ACTIVITY
C I T Y O F
Reduce nuclear power production risks in the following ways. • Participate in programs and emergency response exercises with federal and State agencies and Southern California Edison to minimize the risks related to nuclear power
production.
• Implement measures related to the San Onofre Nuclear
Generating Station (SONGS) in the City's Multi -Hazard
Functional Plan to ensure that residents are prepared for any problems associated with the facility.
Agency/Department: Planning, Public Works, Building & Safety Related Policy: 2.6
Protect residents and businesses from criminal activity by providing substantive levels of police protection and educating the public about methods to reduce criminal activity. The specific actions to implement these goals are identified below:
• When renewing the service contracts with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department, ensure that contracted staffing levels are consistent with the population and geography of Temecula, and that sufficient emphasis is placed on staff and programs for crime prevention.
• Ensure the mutual aid agreements between the City and surrounding jurisdictions are in place for emergency
situations.
• Use defensible space and lighting concepts in development projects designed to enhance public safety.
• Increase public awareness about criminal activity and crime prevention activities. Maximize the use of after school programs, volunteer and citizen programs, and other
community oriented policing programs with the Police
Department.
Agency/Department: City Manager's Office, Police, Planning Related Policies: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3
T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-32
PS-13 Require all residential development with 35 or more dwelling units to SECONDARY provide secondary access that meets full City standards to ensure ACCESS timely emergency service response.
Agency/Department: Planning, Fire
Related Policy: 3.4
PS-14 Maintain the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan under provisions of the LOCAL HAZARD State Emergency Management System format to maximize the efforts MITIGATION PLAN of emergency service providers (e.g. fire, medical and law enforcement) and minimize human suffering and property damage associated with disasters. The Plan should identify resources available for emergency response and establish coordinated action plans for specific emergency situations and disasters including earthquakes, hazardous materials incidents, flooding, dam failure, wild land fire, incidents at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, transportation incidents, and national security emergencies.
Agency/Department: City Manager's Office, Public Works, Police, Fire, Planning
Related Policies: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 5.2
PS-15 Encourage resident participation in citizen -based programs and EMERGENCY educate residents to take appropriate actions to safeguard life and PREPAREDNESS property during and immediately after emergencies. Education about emergency preparedness can occur through the distribution of EDUCATION brochures, presentations to civic groups and homeowners associations and instruction to local schools.
Agency/Department: Planning, Police, Fire
Related Policy: 4.1
PS-16 Prepare, adopt and implement a grading ordinance to ensure that GRADING grading associated with new development projects is conducted in ORDINANCE accordance with appropriate geotechnical engineering standards Agency/Department: Planning, Public Works
Related Policy: 1.5
Required by General Plan EIR
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-33
This page left intentionally blank.
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N
PS-34
Item No. 12
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
JULY 141) 2026
CALL TO ORDER at 4:50 PM: President James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Rahn, Second by Kalfus. The vote reflected unanimous approval.
16. Approve Action Minutes of June 9, 2026
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of June 9, 2026.
CSD BUSINESS
17. Receive Recommendations Related to September llth Remembrance Event and Provide General Direction Regarding the Same (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Maw Alexander and Mayor Pro-Tem Rahn)
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive recommendations related to the September 1 lth Remembrance event and provide general direction regarding the same.
General direction only, no action.
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
At 5:02 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 28, 2026 at 2:00 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 3:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
James Stewart, President
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Item No. 13
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: July 28, 2026
SUBJECT: Approve Financial Statements for the 3rd Quarter Ended March 31, 2026 PREPARED BY: Catlin Dorset, Finance Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Receive and file the financial statements for the 3rd quarter ended March 31, 2026; and
2. Approve Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget adjustments outlined in Exhibit A.
BACKGROUND: The attached Financial Statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Temecula Community Services District for the 3rd Quarter Ended March 31, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT: Noted in the attached TCSD Fund Summaries.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. TCSD Fund Summaries
2. Exhibit A — 2025-26 Budget Adjustments
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 190 - TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUND
% Change
2025-26
Year to Date
2025-26 Q3
from
2024-25
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
3-31-2026
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Special Tax (Measure C)
1,894,831
1,935,718
1,020,720
1,935,718
0 0.0
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Contract Classes
1,202,678
1,200,000
1,048,316
1,200,000
0 0.0
Classes/Activities
114,279
71,077
63,625
71,077
0 0.0 %
Facility Rentals
441,776
428,576
397,600
428,576
0 0.0 %
Aquatics
362,952
337,726
276,420
337,726
0 0.0
Museum Admissions
101,832
95,045
77,769
95,045
0 0.0 %
Theater Admissions
245,400
271,800
219,124
271,800
0 0.0
Sports Leagues & Tournaments
309,516
231,943
208,000
231,943
0 0.0
Day Camps
137,217
120,450
5,650
120,450
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
39,567
35,000
26,048
35,000
0 0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
248,698
123,263
101,793
123,263
0 0.0
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
15,864,726
14,331,992
10,785,196
14,331,992
0 0.0
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
99,767
82,380
43,919
82,380
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
21,063,238
19,264,970
14,274,179
19,264,970
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
11,875,701
12,419,854
8,870,380
12,419,854
0 0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
5,811,001
5,282,513
4,040,292
5,287,013
4,500
0.1 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
2,644,917
2,810,386
2,068,356
2,810,386
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
20,331,619
20,512,754
14,979,027
20,517,254
4,500
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
731,620
(1,247,783)
(704,849)
(1,252,283)
(4,500)
0.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
624,497
1,356,116
1,356,116
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,356,116
108,333
103,833
Fund Description
Citywide Operations reflects the collection of the Special Tax (Measure C) charged to households for recreation programs as well as fees for classes and activities. Accounts for facility operations, maintenance, and community
recreation
programs. Measure C was
approved by residents in 1997 at a rate of $74.44 per parcel for the purpose of maintaining the City's parks, recreation facilities, arterial street lighting and traffic signals. The Special Tax revenue is allocated equally between TCSD and the General Fund to fund both recreation programs and parks maintenance.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 191 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREETLIGHT REPLACEMENT FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
67,781
47,370
45,737 47,370 0 0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
200,000
0 0 0 0 0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
267,781
47,370
45,737 47,370 0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
0 20,000
0 20,000 0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
0 20,000
0 20,000 0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
267,781
27,370
45,737 27,370 0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,324,223
1,592,004
1,592,004
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,592,004
1,619,374
1,619,374
Fund Description
This fund was established to accumulate resources for the replacement of streetlight equipment, poles and lightbulbs, as the City has acquired street lights from Southern California
Edison, and
to install new street
lights as needed throughout the City. Each year,
$200,000 is transferred to this fund from the TCSD
Service Level "B" Street Lights
Fund (Fund 192), until the desired reserve of $1.5
million is reached.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 192 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B"
STREET LIGHTS FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3
from
2024-25 Current
Actuals Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals Budget
3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
657,526 658,173
347,949 658,173 0
0.0 Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
25,412 15,756
15,698 15,756 0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
682,937 673,929
363,647 673,929 0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
0 206,647
139,292 206,647 0
0.0 Operations & Maintenance
364,803 436,488
251,696 436,488 0
0.0 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
0 36,603
21,143 36,603 0
0.0 %
Transfers
200,000 0
0 0 0
0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
564,803 679,738
412,131 679,738 0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
118,135 (5,810)
(48,485) (5,810) 0
0.0 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
523,266 641,400
641,400
Fund Balance, End of Year
641,400 635,590
635,590
Fund Description
Service Level B reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners. Service Level B includes only
those
parcels within residential subdivisions that receive residential street lighting services. This service level includes operational, administrative, maintenance and utility costs of residential streetlights. Each year, $200,000 is transferred from this fund to the
TCSD Service Level "B" Streetlight Replacement Fund (Fund 191) to accommodate these costs, until the desired reserve in Fund 191
of $1.5 million is reached.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 194 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING FUND % Change
2025-26
Year to Date
2025-26 Q3
from
2024-25
Current
Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
3-31-2026
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
10,577,457
10,586,696
5,799,143
10,586,696 0
0.0 Recycling Program
66,174
33,000
32,953
60,593 27,593
83.6 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
73,374
33,639
15,752
33,639 0
0.0 %
Other
50,755
0 0
0 0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
10,767,760
10,653,336
5,847,848
10,680,929 27,593
0.3 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
70,288
82,946
56,695
82,946 0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
10,828,043
11,157,451
5,809,973
11,157,451 0
0.0 %
Capital Outlay
76,659
11,516
4,750
39,109 27,593
239.6 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
10,974,991
11,251,913
5,871,419
11,279,506 27,593
0.2 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(207,230)
(598,577)
(23,570)
(598,577) 0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
945,198
737,968
737,968
Fund Balance, End of Year
737,968
139,390
139,390
Fund Description
Service Level D Fund is used to collect benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing refuse collection, recycling, and street sweeping throughout the City, which is provided
by CR&R.
In addition, Service Level D has received
grants to increase recycling efforts Citywide.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 195 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date
2025-26 Q3
from
2024-25
Current Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget 3-31-2026
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
5,667
5,532 3,256
5,532 0
0.0 Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
2,035
1,410 1,363
1,410 0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
7,703
6,943 4,619
6,943 0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
274
2,434 399
2,434 0
0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
274
2,434 399
2,434 0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
7,429
4,509 4,220
4,509 0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
40,123
47,551
47,551
Fund Balance, End of Year
47,551
52,060
52,060
Fund Description
Service Level R Fund reflects the operational, administrative, construction and maintenance costs for certain unpaved roads that
become inaccessible after inclement weather. Zone
R-1 provides service in the Nicolas/Liefer Road area. The maximum rate that can be charged for Zone R-1 for an improved parcel is $115.26 and for an unimproved parcel is $57.62.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 196 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. FUND % Change
2025-26
Year to Date
2025-26 Q3
from
2024-25
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
3-31-2026
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
257,481
259,318
137,551
259,318
0 0.0
Harveston Lake Boat Revenue
1,500
7,500
6,000
7,500
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
17,861
12,023
8,970
12,023
0 0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
10,095
9,000
8,580
9,000
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
286,937
287,841
161,101
287,841
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
13,319
14,976
10,304
14,976
0 0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
288,123
361,600
301,023
361,600
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
301,441
376,576
311,327
376,576
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(14,504)
(88,735)
(150,226)
(88,735)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
372,780
358,276
358,276
Fund Balance, End of Year
358,276
269,541
269,541
Fund Description
Service Level L Fund reflects the benefit assessments
charged to property owners for the purpose of maintaining the Harveston
Lake Park. Expenditures include operational, administrative and maintenance costs.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 197 - TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
% Change
2025-26
Year to Date
2025-26 Q3
from
2024-25
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
3-31-2026
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Printing & Copies
12,176
13,442
10,112
13,442
0 0.0
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures
11,997
10,178
8,131
10,178
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
14,805
9,124
6,628
9,124
0 0.0 %
Lease/Rental Income
14,538
16,540
12,927
16,540
0 0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
0 150
150
150
0 0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
1,127,563
1,308,073
981,055
1,308,073
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
1,181,079
1,357,507
1,019,003
1,357,507
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
282,939
361,661
255,932
361,661
0 0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
517,259
550,867
300,726
550,867
0 0.0 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
381,529
541,414
358,000
541,414
0 0.0 %
Capital Outlay
0 57,494
41,150
57,494
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
1,181,727
1,511,436
955,808
1,511,436
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(649)
(153,929)
63,194
(153,929)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
255,327
254,678
254,678
Fund Balance, End of Year
254,678
100,750
100,750
Fund Description
The Library Fund is used to account for the maintenance and operations
of the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library on Pauba Road.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 198 - PUBLIC ART FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date
2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals
Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026
Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Public Art 18,441 6,300 6,290
6,300 0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 13,805 9,791 8,778
9,791 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 32,246 16,091 15,068
16,091 0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance 7,316 15,540 0
15,540 0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 7,316 15,540 0
15,540 0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 24,930 551 15,068 551 0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 280,483 305,413
305,413
Fund Balance, End of Year 305,413 305,964
305,964
Fund Description
This fund was established pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 5.08.040, whereby the fund serves as a depository for the
fees paid in lieu of art as well as monetary donations for public art. The Public Art In Lieu fee is one -tenth of one percent of an eligible development project in excess of $100,000. Eligible uses of this fund include the design, acquisition, installation,
improvement, maintenance and insurance of public artwork; offering of performing arts programs on City property for the community; and art education programs on City property for the community.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 501 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments 37,749 37,932 19,613 37,932 0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 1,077 641 611 641 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 38,826 38,573 20,223 38,573 0 0.0 % Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance 35,847 43,266 31,941 43,266 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 35,847 43,266 31,941 43,266 0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,979 (4,693) (11,718) (4,693) 0 0.0 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 24,456 27,436 27,436
Fund Balance, End of Year 27,436 22,743 22,743
Fund Description
Service Level C Fund reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance throughout the City. Service Level C assesses only those parcels within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and are separated into 32 zones. The rate levels for Zones 6 and 29, are subject to a Consumer Price Index -Urban Consumers (CPI-U) annual inflator while all other rate levels will not increase. Zones 30-32 will not be assessed, as the property owners have elected to have the landscaping maintained by the respective Homeowner's Associations (HOAs).
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 502 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
42,764
42,542
22,256
42,542
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
6,779
4,646
4,118
4,646
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
49,543
47,188
26,374
47,188
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
36,777
61,547
40,230
61,547
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
36,777
61,547
40,230
61,547
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
12,766
(14,359)
(13,856)
(14,359)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
138,874
151,640
151,640
Fund Balance, End of Year
151,640
137,281
137,281
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 503 - SERVICE LEVEL" C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
47,157
3,324
47,328
2,214
25,555
1,959
47,328
2,214
0 0
0.0 0.0
50,481
49,542
27,514
49,542
0 0.0 %
47,776
52,703
38,019
52,703
0 0.0
47,776
52,703
38,019
52,703
0 0.0 %
2,705
(3,161)
(10,505)
(3,161)
0 0.0 %
74,496
77,201
77,201
77,201
74,039
74,039
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 504 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
6,316
298
6,394
183
3,316
167
6,394
183
0 0
0.0 0.0
6,614
6,577
3,483
6,577
0 0.0 %
6,781
7,796
5,443
7,796
0 0.0
6,781
7,796
5,443
7,796
0 0.0 %
(166)
(1,219)
(1,960)
(1,219)
0 0.0 %
7,497
7,330
7,330
7,330
6,112
6,112
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 505 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
38,929
1,833
39,025
1,153
21,088
1,126
39,025
1,153
0 0
0.0 0.0
40,761
40,178
22,214
40,178
0 0.0 %
34,135
39,195
28,511
39,195
0 0.0
34,135
39,195
28,511
39,195
0 0.0 %
6,626
983
(6,297)
983
0 0.0 %
38,157
44,783
44,783
44,783
45,766
45,766
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 506 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
31,594
2,546
32,275
1,713
16,701
1,632
32,275
1,713
0 0
0.0 0.0
34,139
33,988
18,333
33,988
0 0.0 %
24,399
31,919
19,903
31,919
0 0.0
24,399
31,919
19,903
31,919
0 0.0 %
9,740
2,069
(1,570)
2,069
0 0.0 %
52,261
62,002
62,002
62,002
64,071
64,071
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 507 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
15,166
835
15,308
537
8,091
566
15,308
537
0 0
0.0 0.0
16,001
15,845
8,657
15,845
0 0.0 %
12,999
15,380
8,792
15,380
0 0.0
12,999
15,380
8,792
15,380
0 0.0 %
3,001
465
(134)
465
0 0.0 %
17,574
20,575
20,575
20,575
21,040
21,040
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 508 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
137,988
137,025
71,447
137,025
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
6,028
3,915
3,429
3,915
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
144,016
140,940
74,876
140,940
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
132,915
136,905
116,635
136,905
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
132,915
136,905
116,635
136,905
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
11,101
4,035
(41,759)
4,035
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
133,220
144,321
144,321
Fund Balance, End of Year
144,321
148,356
148,356
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 509 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
5,097
1,458
5,106
1,017
2,829
845
5,106
1,017
0 0
0.0 0.0
6,555
6,123
3,674
6,123
0 0.0 %
4,687
5,172
3,688
5,172
0 0.0
4,687
5,172
3,688
5,172
0 0.0 %
1,869
951
(13)
951
0 0.0 %
29,567
31,436
31,436
31,436
32,387
32,387
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 510 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
9,628
814
9,744
539
4,945
493
9,744
539
0 0
0.0 0.0
10,442
10,283
5,438
10,283
0 0.0 %
8,536
9,977
6,591
9,977
0 0.0
8,536
9,977
6,591
9,977
0 0.0 %
1,906
306
(1,152)
306
0 0.0 %
17,347
19,253
19,253
19,253
19,559
19,559
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 511 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
2,354
209
2,450
141
1,222
113
2,450
141
0 0
0.0 0.0
2,563
2,591
1,335
2,591
0 0.0 %
2,357
2,495
2,112
2,495
0 0.0
2,357
2,495
2,112
2,495
0 0.0 %
205
96 (777)
96 0
0.0 %
4,499
4,704
4,704
4,704
4,799
4,799
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 512 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
96,007
96,396
49,383
96,396
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,440
2,834
2,375
2,834
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
100,448
99,230
51,758
99,230
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
96,859
97,755
85,076
97,755
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
96,859
97,755
85,076
97,755
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
3,588
1,475
(33,318)
1,475
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
99,290
102,879
102,879
Fund Balance, End of Year
102,879
104,354
104,354
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 513 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
34,279
1,824
34,224
1,161
18,222
1,069
34,224
1,161
0 0
0.0 0.0
36,103
35,385
19,291
35,385
0 0.0 %
32,770
34,330
24,945
34,330
0 0.0
32,770
34,330
24,945
34,330
0 0.0 %
3,333
1,055
(5,654)
1,055
0 0.0 %
39,511
42,844
42,844
42,844
43,899
43,899
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 514 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
14,801
14,774
7,578
14,774
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
673
421
400
421
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
15,474
15,195
7,978
15,195
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
13,742
14,240
10,874
14,240
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
13,742
14,240
10,874
14,240
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,733
955
(2,896)
955
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
14,970
16,703
16,703
Fund Balance, End of Year
16,703
17,658
17,658
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 515 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
9,800
845
9,800
559
4,988
534
9,800
559
0 0
0.0 0.0
10,645
10,359
5,522
10,359
0 0.0 %
7,200
10,122
8,185
10,122
0 0.0
7,200
10,122
8,185
10,122
0 0.0 %
3,445
237
(2,663)
237
0 0.0 %
17,209
20,654
20,654
20,654
20,891
20,891
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 516 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
37,801
4,512
37,800
3,059
19,875
2,836
37,800
3,059
0 0
0.0 0.0
42,313
40,859
22,711
40,859
0 0.0 %
34,351
44,512
23,857
44,512
0 0.0
34,351
44,512
23,857
44,512
0 0.0 %
7,962
(3,653)
(1,145)
(3,653)
0 0.0 %
96,615
104,576
104,576
104,576
100,924
100,924
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 517 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
2,107
160
2,116
105
1,150
97 2,116
105
0 0
0.0 0.0
2,267
2,221
1,247
2,221
0 0.0 %
1,813
4,288
1,633
4,288
0 0.0
1,813
4,288
1,633
4,288
0 0.0 %
454
(2,067)
(386)
(2,067)
0 0.0 %
3,315
3,769
3,769
3,769
1,702
1,702
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 518 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
94,215
94,010
50,690
94,010
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,675
2,977
2,991
2,977
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
98,891
96,987
53,680
96,987
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
80,637
92,905
70,847
92,905
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
80,637
92,905
70,847
92,905
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
18,254
4,082
(17,166)
4,082
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
97,285
115,539
115,539
Fund Balance, End of Year
115,539
119,622
119,622
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 519 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
54,308
4,318
54,450
2,919
30,014
2,399
54,450
2,919
0 0
0.0 0.0
58,626
57,369
32,414
57,369
0 0.0 %
57,506
59,701
49,116
59,701
0 0.0
57,506
59,701
49,116
59,701
0 0.0 %
1,121
(2,332)
(16,703)
(2,332)
0 0.0 %
94,821
95,941
95,941
95,941
93,609
93,609
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 520 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
177,485
177,975
92,679
177,975
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
14,915
10,058
8,549
10,058
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
192,400
188,033
101,228
188,033
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
176,159
180,145
132,591
180,145
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
176,159
180,145
132,591
180,145
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
16,241
7,888
(31,363)
7,888
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
313,229
329,470
329,470
Fund Balance, End of Year
329,470
337,358
337,358
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 521 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
228,574
228,201
120,463
228,201
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
9,916
6,561
5,172
6,561
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
238,490
234,762
125,635
234,762
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
233,420
235,285
200,613
235,285
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
233,420
235,285
200,613
235,285
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
5,069
(523)
(74,978)
(523)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
223,299
228,368
228,368
Fund Balance, End of Year
228,368
227,846
227,846
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 522 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
4,350
4,408
2,327
4,408
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
666
456
401
456
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
5,016
4,864
2,728
4,864
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
3,674
7,305
4,391
7,305
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
3,674
7,305
4,391
7,305
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,341
(2,441)
(1,664)
(2,441)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
13,835
15,176
15,176
Fund Balance, End of Year
15,176
12,736
12,736
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 523 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
8,281
1,649
8,400
1,139
4,214
987
8,400
1,139
0 0
0.0 0.0
9,930
9,539
5,201
9,539
0 0.0 %
7,530
8,591
4,392
8,591
0 0.0
7,530
8,591
4,392
8,591
0 0.0 %
2,401
948
808
948
0 0.0 %
33,484
35,885
35,885
35,885
36,833
36,833
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 524 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
161,876
162,100
88,735
162,100
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
2,555
1,038
1,312
1,038
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
164,432
163,138
90,048
163,138
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
159,121
161,755
125,835
161,755
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
159,121
161,755
125,835
161,755
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
5,310
1,383
(35,787)
1,383
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
74,307
79,617
79,617
Fund Balance, End of Year
79,617
81,001
81,001
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 525 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
43,691
44,000
22,513
44,000
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,545
3,061
2,734
3,061
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
48,236
47,061
25,247
47,061
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
35,656
55,800
47,385
55,800
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
35,656
55,800
47,385
55,800
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
12,580
(8,739)
(22,138)
(8,739)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
93,216
105,796
105,796
Fund Balance, End of Year
105,796
97,057
97,057
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 526 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERY TRADITION FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
2,160
140
2,160
93 1,215
75 2,160
93 0
0 0.0
0.0 2,300
2,253
1,290
2,253
0 0.0 %
2,326
2,170
1,655
2,170
0 0.0
2,326
2,170
1,655
2,170
0 0.0 %
(26)
83 (365)
83 0
0.0 %
3,093
3,067
3,067
3,067
3,150
3,150
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 527 - SERVICE LEVEL" C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
9,021
584
9,100
376
4,690
389
9,100
376
0 0
0.0 0.0
9,605
9,476
5,079
9,476
0 0.0 %
7,330
10,212
6,123
10,212
0 0.0
7,330
10,212
6,123
10,212
0 0.0 %
2,275
(736)
(1,044)
(736)
0 0.0 %
12,745
15,020
15,020
15,020
14,284
14,284
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 528 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK FUND
% Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
231,572
232,974
123,419
232,974
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
12,497
7,759
4,535
7,759
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
244,069
240,733
127,954
240,733
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
225,490
239,305
189,970
239,305
0 0.0
Transfers
39,117
692
0 692
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
264,607
239,997
189,970
239,997
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(20,538)
737
(62,015)
737
0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
264,428
243,891
243,891
Fund Balance, End of Year
243,891
244,628
244,628
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 529 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT FUND % Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
4,893
5,031
2,871
5,031
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
609
413
399
413
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
5,502
5,443
3,271
5,443
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
3,499
4,005
2,189
4,005
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
3,499
4,005
2,189
4,005
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,003
1,438
1,081
1,438
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
12,186
14,189
14,189
Fund Balance, End of Year
14,189
15,628
15,628
Fund Description
IL
f
Adk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 530 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES FUND
Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
0 1,263
151 1,263
0 0.0
0 1,263
151 1,263
0 0.0
0 1,263
151 1,263
0 0.0
36,062 36,062 36,062
36,062 37,325 37,325
190 190.180.164 TCSD Maintenance
nses 5250
Exhibit A
Other Outside Services
194 194.180.000 TCSD Svc Lvl D-Refuse/Recycling Revenues 4096 Recycling Program 194 194.180.507 TCSD Svc Lvl D-Refuse/Recycling Expenses 5610 Equipment vice Level D - Refuse/Recycling Tota
4,500.00 To reflect higher than anticipated EV charging costs. 4,500.00
27,593.00 'To reflect Grant revenue received March 18, 2026. 27,593.00 To reflect Grant revenue received March 18, 2026. 55,186.00
Item No. 14
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: July 28, 2026
SUBJECT: Approve Temecula Community Services District Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2026-27
PREPARED BY: Paula Majors, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES
FOR SERVICE LEVEL B — RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING,
SERVICE LEVEL C — PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, SERVICE
LEVEL D — RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION, AND
SERVICE LEVEL R — EMERGENCY UNPAVED ROAD
MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection and unpaved road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with the City and the City Council serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD.
Property owners pay only for the TCSD services used or made available to their property through separate rates and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City's Parks/Lighting Services Special Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. Although the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities through a cooperative agreement with the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax is scheduled to be considered and approved by the City Council on July 28, 2026.
The TCSD is required to complete an annual levy process, which includes adopting a resolution to accept the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary to provide the following services; noticing each affected property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges.
The four current service levels of the TCSD include:
1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting.
2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance.
3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Collection.
4. Service Level R — Unpaved Road Maintenance.
1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting
The TCSD Rates and Charges for Service Level B are not proposed to increase from last year's rates. The rate is capped at $25.68 per single family residential.
2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance As a result of various property owner elections, there are two zones subject to an annual rate increase. The rate increase is the lesser of:
(1) the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, for the previous calendar year
(2) 5%
The Annual CPI change for 2026 was 3.28%. As a result, the following zones will see a 3.28% increase in the rates for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
Zone No. and Name
25-26 Rate
26-27 Rate
Increase
6 - Woodcrest County
$140.95
$145.58
$4.63
29 - Gallery Portraits
$503.09
$519.59
$16.50
3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Service Per the Franchise Agreement with CR&R, the change in CPI and land -fill tipping fees determine the increase/decrease in the annual Service Level D rate and charge. An increase of $18.65 is proposed to the annual rate and charge for Service Level D from $363.68 to $382.33 per residential unit beginning Fiscal Year 2026-27. The increase is due to a CPI increase of 2.77%, and an overall reduction to the annual rate adjustment to maintain the fund balance in Fund 194. In addition, the County of Riverside's Waste Management Department has indicated that they will be increasing their disposal fees by 14.92% for fiscal year 2026-2027.
4. Service Level R — Unpaved Street and Road Maintenance The TCSD rates and charges for Service Level R are not proposed to increase from their approved per parcel rate. The rate is capped at $115.26 per single family residential and $57.62 per vacant residential property.
As per Proposition 218 all property owners are required to be noticed as to the rates and proposed charges that the TCSD will be assessing at least 45 days prior to the public hearing. Notices were mailed on June 10, 2026, calling for a July 28, 2026, public hearing. On May 26, 2026, the TCSD Board of Directors approved a Resolution of Intention that called for the public hearing to be held on July 28, 2026.
The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD.
The total revenue for all service levels as written in the attached 2026-27 Engineer's Annual Levy Report is $13,888,057 which varies slightly from the Annual Operating Budget due to timing differences in the production of the two documents. The revisions did not result in any rate increases.
FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated for the TCSD Fiscal Year 2026-27 rates and charges will fund residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection services in the City of Temecula.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution — Service Levels B, C and D
2. Final Engineer's Report - Fiscal Year 2026-27
3. Notice of Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES
FOR SERVICE LEVEL B — RESIDENTIAL STREET
LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C — PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING, SERVICE LEVEL D — RECYCLING AND
REFUSE COLLECTION, AND SERVICE LEVEL R —
EMERGENCY UNPAVED ROAD MAINTENANCE
SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes collected within the TCSD in the same manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, recycling and refuse collection, and emergency unpaved road maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2026-27. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary of the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD and is available for public inspection.
Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of the Report and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed as required by law on June 10, 2026, calling for a public hearing on July 28, 2026. Notice was published as required by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD.
Section 5. On July 28, 2026, the Board of Directors held a duly noticed public hearing at which the Board of Directors heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and
comments by interested person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates and charges.
Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the District budget, the rates and charges as set out in the Engineer's Report do not exceed the reasonable cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and protests and adopts the rates and charges for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, recycling and refuse collection and emergency unpaved road maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2026-27 as set out on Exhibit A.
Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien or a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2026-27, or claims that an error has been made with respect to the implantation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2026, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or correction of errors program.
Section 10. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2026-27 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2026, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program.
Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 14, 2026, the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make the collection of such rates and charges as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefore.
Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD.
Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 28th day of July, 2026.
James Stewart, President
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 281h day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
4 Webb
MUNIC-IIIAL t-Ii
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Temecula Community Services District
Service Levels 6, C, R and Refuse & Recycling Collection Prepared For
is
a
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
July 2026
Table of Contents
Sections
Tables
Section i. Engineer's Statement
Section 1.
Description of Services
1 Section 2.
Budgets and Levy Summary
2 Section 3.
District Services and Charges
10 Section 4.
Changes to the District
16 Section 5.
Method of Apportionment
18 Section 6.
Tax Roll
21 Table 2-1.
Operating Budget Summary for Service Levels B, D and R
3 Table 2-2.
Operating Budget for Service Level C
4 Table 2-3.
Year over Year Budget Comparison
9 Table 3-1.
Service Level B
10 Table 3-2.
Service Level C
11 Table S-1.
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B
18 Table S-2.
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C
19 Table S-3.
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level R
20 Table S-4.
Parcel Charge Calculation Refuse/Recycling Collection
20 Appendices
Appendix A. Tax Roll A-1
i. Engineer's Statement
AGENCY: CITY OF TEMECULA
PROJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
REPORT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 61115
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, this Report is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level B, Service Level C, Service Level R and Refuse/Recycling Collection rates and charges for the parcels and territories within the District. A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and review of the Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES of the areas covered and the services provided for the Fiscal Year. The description of services shows and describes the existing improvements and is sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.
SECTION 2 A BUDGETS AND LEVY SUMMARY by Service Level of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.
SECTION 3 A description of the DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES by Service Level, describing the method used to apportion the District charges.
SECTION 4 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT Contains details of changes that have occurred within the District since its inception that could affect the levy.
SECTION 5 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT used to Calculate the levy for each of the Service Levels.
SECTION 6 The TAx ROLL information.
Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
i. Engineer's Statement
WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (the "City"), effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "District") to provide specified services previously provided by the County of Riverside (the "County") to properties within its jurisdiction. The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors (the "Board") for the District. The District collects property -related fees and charges ("Charges") in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District.
The District was formed, and Charges were set and established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law").
WHEREAS, each fiscal year, an Engineer's Annual Levy Report (the "Report") is prepared, filed, and approved by the Board. This Report describes the District, any changes to the District, and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Parcel Number or Property Identification Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Property Identification Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify, on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. The Charges contained in the Report are based on the historical and estimated costs to service properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services provided to the parcel. The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope protection, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well as unpaved road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District.
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115 the District has prescribed, revised, and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting ("Service Level B"), perimeter landscaping ("Service Level C"), unpaved road maintenance ("Service Level R"), and Refuse/Recycling Collection services furnished by the District, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115.
Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) II Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
i. Engineer's Statement
Now, THEREFORE, I Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the Temecula Community Services District, pursuant to the "CSD Law", do hereby submit the following:
The District requested Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file an Engineer's Levy Report for Temecula Community Services District (Levels B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) pursuant to the Government Code Section 61115, presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the improvements for Service Levels B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection, for the referenced Fiscal Year, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within each Service Level and Refuse/Recycling Collection in proportion to the special benefit received;
This Report and the information contained herein reflect the proposed budget for each of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District.
Please note that Albert A. Webb Associates provides engineering advice and related consulting services. Albert A. Webb Associates is not a registered municipal advisor and does not participate in municipal advisory activities, and nothing in this Engineer's Report is, or should be interpreted to be, municipal advisory services or advice.
Executed this day of J L4Y'l 2026.
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Q�pFESSJ4N
a
N0. 37385 M MA EW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385
ClvlV Q ENGINEER OF WORK
�rF caLlf0t ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Temecula Community Services District (Sen•ice Level B. C. R and Refuse. Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Le+y Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
i. Engineer's Statement
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessments and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. by the Board of Directors.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Tax Roll and Engineer's Annual Levy Report was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the day of 12026.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report, for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 IV
1. Description of Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City. The District provides certain property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate and distinct services referred to as "Service Levels". Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided.
All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is provided in accordance with the Method of Apportionment of the specific service level. Services and improvements provided throughout the District include residential street lighting, perimeter landscape maintenance and slope protection, unpaved road improvement construction and maintenance, and a refuse and recycling collection program. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting
Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of residential streetlights.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping
Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration of all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the District.
Service Level R - Unpaved Road Maintenance
Services include the operation and administration of certain unpaved streets and roads maintained by the District.
Refuse/Recycling Collection
Services include the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program for single-family dwellings.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
The budgets for each Service Level are shown below. Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are levied for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge per Levy Unit" (shown in Table 2-2), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly spreads the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and Refuse/Recycling Collection is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit ("PDU"), which is similar to a per parcel count but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to Section 5, Method of Apportionment.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 2 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Table 2-1
Service Levels B, R and Refuse/Recycling Operating Budget Summary for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2026
PERSONNEL
Services
$212,894
$0
$96,021
$308,915
Subtotal Personnel Services
$212,894
I
$0
$96,021
1 $308,915
OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE 5200'S
Repair & Maintenance Facilities 5212
$40,000
$0
$0
$40,000
Office Supplies 5220
$0
$0
$0
$0
Printing 5222
$0
$0
$0
$0
Election Costs (Offset by Developer Deposits) 5225
$0
$0
$0
$0
Dues and Memberships 5226
$0
$0
$6,500
$6,500
Postage and Packaging 5230
$0
$0
$0
$0
Property Tax Administrative Fees 5231
$17,000
$200
$14,000
$31,200
Utilities 5240
$0
$0
$0
$0
Small Tools and Equipment 5242
$0
$0
$0
$0
Uniforms 5243
$0
$0
$350
$350
Consulting Services 5248
$11,688
$234
$0
$11,922
Other Outside Services 5250
$0
$0
$25,501
$25,501
Public Notices 5256
$0
$0
$23,000
$23,000
Staff Training/Education 5261
$0
$0
$0
$0
Mileage 5262
$0
$0
$0
$0
Recognition Program 5265
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal S200's
$68,688
$434
$69,351
$138,473
Waste Hauling 5315
$0
$0
$11,733,717
$11,733,717
Street Lighting 5319
$455,000
$0
$0
$455,000
Subtotal5300's
$455,000
$0
$11,733,717
$12,188,717
Emergency Road Maintenance 5402
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
Landscape Maintenance 5415
$0
$0
$0
$0
Landscape Rehabilitation 5416
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal S400's
$0
I
$10,000
$0
$10,000
Insurance 5530
$25,922
$0
$0
$25,922
Vehicles and Equipment 5535
$13,933
$0
$0
$13,933
Subtotal SSOO's
$39,855
$0
$0
$39,855
Recycling Programs
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal
$0
$0
$0
$0
Capital Outlay
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL DIRECT DISTRICT COSTS
$776,437 $10,434
$11,899,089
$12,725,815
EXPENDITURES/REVENUES
Contingency Reserve
$0 $0
$0
$0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES / REVENUES
$776,437
$10,434
$11,899,089
$12,725,815
CONTRIBUTIONS
Contributions from Grants 4025
$0
$0
$0
$0
Operation Income
$0
$0
$0
$0
Other Contributions
$118,285
$0
$0
$118,285
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
$0
$4,902
$268,993
$273,894
TOTAL COLLECTION/CONTRIBUTIONS
$118,285
S4,902
S268,993
S392,179
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 3 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Table 2-2
Service Levels C Operating Budget for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2026 Budget FY 2026-2027
DIRECT COSTS
Saddlewoodhl
i ainch
7s13,,o2o0o0
The
Vineyards
$1,000
Signet
$2,500
$12,000
Woodcrest
$1,500
$9,400
Repair & Maintenance / Facility7$9,000
,5007slo,,520000
Utilities
$1,800
Landscape Contract
$29,304
$20,808
$23,700
$4,068
$21,258
$10,776
Rehabilitation
$3,000
$30,000
$15,000
$1,000
$5,000
$12,000
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$42,804
$62,508
$53,900
$7,868
$40,758
$33,676
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
County Fees
$206
$258
$234
$140
$169
$171
Special Tax Consultant
$250
$300
$250
$175
$175
$200
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$461
$563
$489
$320
$349
$376
TOTAL•
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance
Collection/Contribution
•$34,052
($1,794)
($2,082)
($5,333)
($20,529)
($7,061)
($714)
1 •
EDUs
FY 2026-2027 Proposed Rate
327
478
$89.00
408
•,
139
$46.00
223
$175.00
229
$116.00
$116.00
$145.58
FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate
$116.00
$89.00
$116.00
$46.00
$175.00
$140.94
FY 2026-2027 Maximum Rate
$116.00
$89.00
$116.00
$46.00
$175.00
$145.58
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
BudgetVillage
DIRECT COSTS
,.
�:
$5,500
Rancho
�•
$1,000
Vintage
Hills
Zone 12
$5,500
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
$1,100
$1,000
$350
Utilities
$6,200
$36,000
$1,500
$4,050
$1,200
$27,000
Landscape Contract
$7,140
$78,804
$1,092
$3,480
$864
$50,052
Rehabilitation
$5,000
$22,000
$2,000
$2,000
$0
$20,000
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$19,440
$142,304
$5,592
$10,530
$2,414
$102,552
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
County Fees
$151
$365
$130
$121
$96
$382
Special Tax Consultant
$175
$400
$150
$150
$125
$450
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$331
$770
$285
$276
$226
$837
TOTAL•
i :i.
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
($4,463)
($6,049)
($771)
($1,062)
($190)
($6,993)
TOTALASSESSMENT
EDUs
FY 2026-2027 Proposed Rate
$15,308
172
$137,025
783
$5,106
111
$9,744
84 14
831
$89.00
$175.00
$46.00
$116.00
$175.00
$116.00
FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate
$89.00
$175.00
$46.00
$116.00
$175.00
$116.00
FY 2026-2027 Maximum Rate
$89.00
$175.00
$46.00
$116.00
$175.00
$116.00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Budget FY 2026-2027
DIRECT COSTS
Develop.Presley
Morrison
Barclay
$800
$2,000
Monte I
Temeku
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
$1,200
$1,000
$105
$3,000
Utilities
$12,200
$6,000
$2,300
$4,500
$1,200
$18,000
Landscape Contract
$16,512
$6,456
$5,736
$13,644
$1,020
$54,522
Rehabilitation
$5,000
$2,500
$1,500
$25,000
$500
$21,500
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$34,912
$15,956
$10,336
$45,144
$2,825
$97,022
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
County Fees
$352
$149
$111
$167
$107
$561
Special Tax Consultant
$425
$175
$130
$200
$125
$625
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$782
$329
$246
$372
$237
$1,191
TOTAL•
94 $16,285
$10,5820.
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
($1,470)
($1,511)
($782)
($7,716)
($946)
($4,203)
EDUs
744
166
56 216
46 1,343
FY 2026-2027 Proposed Rate
$46.00
$89.00
$175.00
$175.00
$46.00
$70.00
FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate
$46.00
$89.00
$175.00
$175.00
$46.00
$70.00
FY 2026-2027 Maximum Rate
$46.00
$89.00
$175.00
$175.00
$46.00
$70.00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
BudgetCrowne
• •
DIRECT COSTS
Zone 19
Zone 20
$5,500
Vail
Zone 21
Sutton
rZone 22
$425
Pheasant
Zone 23
$400
Zone 24
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
$2,500
$15,000
$12,000
Utilities
$13,300
$40,000
$45,000
$1,600
$1,900
$42,000
Landscape Contract
$35,892
$78,960
$135,708
$2,292
$3,228
$77,748
Rehabilitation
$8,000
$60,000
$47,000
$3,000
$3,000
$38,000
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$59,692
$184,460
$242,708
$7,317
$8,528
$169,748
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
County Fees
$176
$447
$710
$104
$238
$659
Special Tax Consultant
$200
$500
$850
$125
$250
$750
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$381
$952
$1,565
$234
$493
$1,414
TOTAL•
.i•
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
($5,623)
($7,437)
($16,072)
($3,143)
($621)
($9,062)
EDUs
242
1,017
1,769
38 420
1,621
FY 2026-2027 Proposed Rate
$225.00
$175.00
$129.00
$116.00
$20.00
$100.00
FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate
$225.00
$175.00
$129.00
$116.00
$20.00
$100.00
FY 2026-2027 Maximum Rate
$225.00
$175.00
$129.00
$116.00
$20.00
$100.00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Budget FY • •MM27�
DIRECT COSTS
Serena
Gallery
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
$2,000
$250
$500
$9,000
$500
Utilities
$10,000
$1,000
$5,285
$82,000
$1,050
Landscape Contract
$25,128
$864
$3,444
$121,944
$1,428
Rehabilitation
$20,000
$0
$1,000
$33,000
$3,000
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$57,128
$2,114
$10,229
$245,944
$5,978
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
$5
$5
$5
$5
$5
County Fees
$168
$94
$137
$723
$95
Special Tax Consultant
$200
$100
$150
$800
$110
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$373
$199
$292
$1,528
$210
TOTAL•
•
($153)
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
($13,501)
($1,421)
($14,498)
($992)
EDUs
220
8 130
1,806
10 FY 2026-2027 Proposed Rate
$200.00
$270.00
$70.00
$129.00
$519.58
FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate
$200.00
$270.00
$70.00
$129.00
$503.08
FY 2026-2027 Maximum Rate
$200.00
$270.00
$70.00
$129.00
$519.59
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
The following Table provides levy information for the various Service Levels within the District, comparing the Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 to the previous fiscal year.
Table 2-3
Year -over -Year Budget Comparison
Fund
FISCAL
YEAR 2025-2026
Total
ENROLLMENTS
Charge
Total
FISCAL YEAR
Total
2026-2027
% Change
PROJECTIONS
Charge
Total
District No. Parcels Levy
Units
Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting
Levy
Unit
Levy
Apac.Is
Levy
Units
per Levy
Uni
Levy
Levy
Single -Family Residential
25,289
25,289
$25.68
$649,421.52
25,289
25,289
0.00%
$25.68
$649,421.52
Condominium
680
340
$25.68
$8,731.20
680
340
0.00%
$25.68
$8,731.20
68-2914
25,969
25,629
$658,152.72
25,969
25,629
$658,152.72
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping
Ilil2i
Zone 1
68-2930
327
327
$116.00
$37,932.00
327
327
0.00%
$116.00
$37,932.00
Zone 2
68-2931
478
478
$89.00
$42,542.00
478
478
0.00%
$89.00
$42,542.00
Zone 3
68-2932
408
408
$116.00
$47,328.00
408
408
0.00%
$116.00
$47,328.00
Zone 4
68-2933
139
139
$46.00
$6,394.00
139
139
0.00%
$46.00
$6,394.00
Zone 5
68-2934
223
223
$175.00
$39,025.00
223
223
0.00%
$175.00
$39,025.00
Zone 6
68-2935
229
229
$140.94
$31,455.44
229
229
3.29%
$145.58
$33,337.82
Zone 7
68-2936
172
172
$89.00
$15,308.00
172
172
0.00%
$89.00
$15,308.00
Zone 8
68-2937
783
783
$175.00
$137,025.00
783
783
0.00%
$175.00
$137,025.00
Zone 9
68-2938
111
111
$46.00
$5,106.00
111
111
0.00%
$46.00
$5,106.00
Zone 10
68-2939
84 84
$116.00
$9,744.00
84 84
0.00%
$116.00
$9,744.00
Zone 11
68-2940
14 14
$175.00
$2,450.00
14 14
0.00%
$175.00
$2,450.00
Zone 12
68-2941
831
831
$116.00
$96,396.00
831
831
0.00%
$116.00
$96,396.00
Zone 13
68-2942
744
744
$46.00
$34,224.00
744
744
0.00%
$46.00
$34,224.00
Zone 14
68-2943
166
166
$89.00
$14,774.00
166
166
0.00%
$89.00
$14,774.00
Zone 15
68-2944
56 56
$175.00
$9,800.00
56 56
0.00%
$175.00
$9,800.00
Zone 16
68-2945
216
216
$175.00
$37,800.00
216
216
0.00%
$175.00
$37,800.00
Zone 17
68-2946
46 46
$46.00
$2,116.00
46 46
0.00%
$46.00
$2,116.00
Zone 18
68-2947
1,343
1,343
$70.00
$94,010.00
1,343
1,343
0.00%
$70.00
$94,010.00
Zone 19
68-2948
242
242
$225.00
$54,450.00
242
242
0.00%
$225.00
$54,450.00
Zone 20
68-2949
1,017
1,017
$175.00
$177,975.00
1,017
1,017
0.00%
$175.00
$177,975.00
Zone 21
68-2950
1,769
1,769
$129.00
$228,201.00
1,769
1,769
0.00%
$129.00
$228,201.00
Zone 22
68-2951
38 38
$116.00
$4,408.00
38 38
0.00%
$116.00
$4,408.00
Zone 23
68-2952
420
420
$20.00
$8,400.00
420
420
0.00%
$20.00
$8,400.00
Zone 24
68-2953
1,621
1,621
$100.00
$162,100.00
1,621
1,621
0.00%
$100.00
$162,100.00
Zone 25
68-2954
220
220
$200.00
$44,000.00
220
220
0.00%
$200.00
$44,000.00
Zone 26
68-2955
8 8
$270.00
$2,160.00
8 8
0.00%
$270.00
$2,160.00
Zone 27
68-2956
130
130
$70.00
$9,100.00
130
130
0.00%
$70.00
$9,100.00
Zone 28
68-2957
1,806
1,806
$129.00
$232,974.00
1,806
1,806
0.00%
$129.00
$232,974.00
Zone 29
68-2958
10 10
$503.08
$4,902.60
10 10
3.28%
$519.58
$5,195.80
Zone 30
N/A
0 N/A
N/A
N/A
0 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Zone 31
N/A
0 N/A
N/A
N/A
0 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Zone 32
N/A
0 N/A
N/A
N/A
0 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
13,651
13,651
$1,592,300.04
13,651
13,651
$1,594,275.62
Service Level R - Road Maintenance
Rate Level
68-2917
55 48
$115.26
$5,532.48
55 48
$115.26
$5,532.48
1 Citywide Refuse/Recycling Collection
68-2916
1 30,170
30,170
$363.68
$10,972,225.60
30,419
30,419
$382.33
$11,630,096.27
(1) The maximum rate per Levy Unit, for Zones 6, 29, 31 and 32 will escalate by the lesser of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), which is
3.28%. For Fiscal Year 2026-2027 the increase will be 3.28%, the percentage increase in the Annual CPI. (2) Zones 30, 31, & 32 will not be levied for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 as the project areas will be maintained by an HOA.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
3. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting
Service Level B includes all developed single-family residential parcels, condominiums, and residential vacant lots for which the District provides ongoing servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential lot ($12.84 per condominium unit within Specific Plans) and shall be applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Table 3-1
Service Level B
04153-00 19872-05 20882-01 21675-04 23063-03 23101-05 23267-02 24135-03 27827-01 29928-00 31053-03 04188-00 19939-00 20882-02 21675-05 23063-04 23101-06 23267-03 24136-00 27827-02 29928-01 31276-00 04457-00 19939-01 20882-03 21675-06 23063-05 23125-00 23267-04 24136-01 27827-03 29928-02 31344-00 06559-00 19939-02 20987-00 21760-00 23063-06 23125-01 23371-00 24136-02 28309-00 29928-03 31898-00 07401-00 20079-00 21067-00 21765-00 23063-07 23125-02 23371-01 24136-03 28480-00 29929-00 32104-00 07402-00 20079-01 21082-00 22148-00 23063-08 23125-03 23371-02 24182-01 28482-00 29929-01 32169-00 08369-00 20079-02 21082-01 22203-00 23064-00 23126-00 23371-03 24182-02 28482-01 30088-00 32170-00 08369-01 20079-03 21082-02 22204-00 23064-01 23128-00 23371-04 24182-03 28482-02 30264-00 32319-00 08369-02 20130-00 21082-03 22208-00 23064-02 23142-00 23371-05 24182-04 28482-03 30264-01 32436-00 11087-01 20130-01 21082-04 22593-00 23064-03 23143-00 23371-06 24183-00 28503-00 30264-02 32436-01 11087-02 20130-02 21340-00 22593-01 23065-00 23143-01 23371-07 24183-01 28510-00 30264-03 32437-00 12189-01 20130-03 21340-01 22593-02 23065-01 23143-02 23371-08 24184-00 28510-01 30264-04 32437-01 12189-02 20130-04 21340-02 22627-00 23065-03 23143-03 23371-09 24184-01 28510-02 30264-05 32437-02 12189-03 20130-05 21340-03 22627-01 23065-04 23143-04 23371-10 24185-00 28510-03 30264-06 32437-03 12189-04 20130-06 21340-04 22715-00 23065-05 23143-06 23371-11 24185-01 28526-00 30264-07 33124-00 12189-05 20153-00 21340-05 22715-01 23066-01 23143-07 23371-14 24185-02 28553-00 30264-08 33125-00 12189-06 20154-00 21340-06 22715-02 23066-02 23143-08 23483-00 24186-00 28553-01 30264-09 34698-00 12189-07 20319-00 21340-07 22716-00 23066-03 23143-09 24131-00 24186-01 28810-00 30264-10 Old Town 13060-01 20643-00 21430-01 22716-01 23066-04 23143-10 24131-01 24186-02 28980-00 30264-11 PM 24387 13060-02 20644-00 21561-00 22716-02 23066-05 23143-11 24131-02 24186-03 29033-00 30264-12 PM 26488 13060-03 20703-01 21672-01 22716-03 23067-02 23173-00 24131-03 24187-00 29036-00 30264-13 PM 27493 13060-04 20703-02 21672-02 22716-04 23067-03 23173-01 24132-00 24187-01 29133-00 30264-14 PM 28122 13060-05 20703-03 21672-03 22761-00 23067-04 23173-02 24132-01 24187-02 29203-00 30264-15 37341-01 13060-06 20735-01 21672-04 22762-00 23067-05 23173-03 24133-00 24188-00 29286-00 30667-00 37341-03 13060-07 20735-02 21673-00 22786-00 23100-01 23173-04 24133-01 24188-01 29734-00 30667-01 37341-04 13060-08 20735-03 21673-01 22915-00 23100-02 23174-01 24133-02 24188-02 29798-00 30667-02 37341-05 18518-00 20735-04 21673-02 22915-01 23100-03 23174-02 24133-03 24188-03 29798-01 30667-03 37341-06 18518-01 20735-05 21673-03 22915-02 23100-04 23174-03 24133-04 24232-00 29798-02 30668-00 37341-07 18518-02 20735-06 21674-00 22915-03 23100-05 23174-04 24133-05 25004-00 29798-03 30668-01 37341-08 18518-03 20735-07 21674-01 22916-00 23100-06 23174-05 24134-00 25004-01 29798-04 30668-02 37341-09 18583-00 20735-08 21674-02 22916-01 23100-07 23174-06 24134-01 25892-00 29798-05 30669-00 37341-10 19872-00 20735-09 21674-03 22916-02 23100-08 23177-00 24134-02 26488-00 29798-06 30669-01 19872-01 20848-00 21675-00 22916-03 23101-01 23209-00 24134-03 26828-00 29798-07 30669-02 19872-02 20879-00 21675-01 22962-00 23101-02 23220-00 24135-00 26828-01 29798-08 31053-00 19872-03 20879-01 21675-02 23063-01 23101-03 23267-00 24135-01 26828-02 29798-09 31053-01 19872-04 20882-00 21675-03 23063-02 23101-04 23267-01 24135-02 27827-00 29798-10 31053-02 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 10 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
3. District Services and Charges
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping
Service level C includes all developed single-family and condominium residential parcels and residential vacant lots for which the District provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public rights -of -way and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required in these tracts and subdivisions varies depending on operating costs. Thirty-two (32) Zones with corresponding rates have been established within Service Level C.
In recent fiscal years, the cost of maintaining the perimeter landscaping for most zones in Service Level C, far accede the maximum assessment that can be levied against the parcels in these zones. As a result, it has been necessary for City staff to reduce services and activities and/or reduce or eliminate the collection of funding for longterm repairs, replacements and rehabilitation.
The current rates and charges for Service Level C is per residential lot and shall be applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Table 3-2
Service Level C
Zone No. 1 Maximum Rate: 11 Proposed 11
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Saddlewood 18518-00 18518-01 18518-02 18518-03
Zone No. 2
Tract Name:
Maximum Rate: 11 1 Proposed 11
Tract Numbers:
Winchester Creek
20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06 21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Rancho Highlands 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00 Zone No. 4 I Maximum Rate: $46.00 I Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
The Vineyards 1' • 11 1' • 1
Zone No. 5 Maximum Rate: $175.00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Signet Series 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03
ProposedZone No. 6 0) Maximum Rate: $145.58
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Woodcrest Country 21561-00 22208-00
(3) Beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010, the base rate for Zone 6 was $95.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011 the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2026-2027 the adjustment is 3.28%, the annual increase in the CPI.
Zone No. 7 Maximum Rate: $89.00 Proposed Rate: $89.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Ridgeview 20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 20881-00 21764-00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
3. District Services and Charges
11 Proposed 11
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Village Grove
21672-01 21672-02
21672-03
21672-04 21673-00 21637-01 21637-02
21673-03 21674-00
21674-01
21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02 21675-03
21675-04
21675-05 21675-06
Zone No. 9 maximum Rate: $46.00 Proposed Rate: $46.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Rancho Solana 22593-00 22593-01 22593-02
Zone No. 10 I Maximum Rate: $116.00 I Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
FARMOM : 11
Zone No. 11 I Maximum Rate: $175.00 I Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
-... - IT FRO1
Zone No. 12
Maximum Rate: 11 Proposed 11
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Vintage Hills
22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03 22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01 22916-02 22916-03
Zone No. 13
Tract Name:
maximum Rate: $46.00 Proposed Rate: $46.00
Tract Numbers:
Presley Development
23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01 26861-02 26861-03
Zone No. 14 I Maximum Rate: $89.00 I Proposed Rate: $89.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Morrison Homes BIT �: 11
Zone No. 15 I Maximum Rate: $175.00 I Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Barclay Estates 11� 1
ximum Rate: $175.00 Proposed Rate: $175.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Tradewinds 1 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03
Zone No. 17 I Maximum Rate: $46.00 I Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
F"AfflIff-mm: 1• 11
Zone No.
1 11
Proposed 1 11
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Te m eku Hills
23371-00 23371-01
23371-02
23371-03 23771-04 23771-05 23371-06
23371-07 23371-08
23371-09
23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 28482-00
28482-01 28482-02
28482-03
28526-00 29033-00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 12 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
3. District Services and Charges
Zone No. 19
Tract Name:
Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $225.00
Tract Numbers:
Chantemar
28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03
Zone No. 20
Tract Name:
maximum Rate: 00 ... 00
Tract Numbers:
Crowne Hill
23143-00 23143-02 23413-03 23413-04 23413-01 23413-03 23413-04 23413-06 23413-07 23413-08 23413-09 23413-10 23413-11
Zone No. 21
Tract Name:
Maximum Rate: ii Proposed Rate: $129.00
Tract Numbers:
Vail Ranch Gated Community
28832-00
Vail Ranch Residential
23173-00 23173-01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02 23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00
Zone No. 22 I Maximum Rate: $116.00 I Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Sutton Place • :. 11
Zone No. 23 Maximum Rate: $20.00 Proposed Rate: $20.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Pheasant Run
19872 19872-01 19872-02 19872-03 19872-04 19872-05
Zone No.
24 Maximum
Rate: $100.00
Proposed
Rate:
$100.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Harveston
29928
29928-01
29928-02
29928-03
29929
29929-01
30088
30667
30667-01
30667-02
30667-03
30668
30668-01
30668-02
30669
30669-01
30669-02
31053
31053-01
31053-02
31053-03
32436
32436-01
32437
32437-01
32437-02
32437-03
34698
Harveston
Ashville 1
31276
Harveston
Ashville 11
32104
Harveston
Condos
32169
32170
Zone No. 25 I Maximum Rate: $200.00 I Proposed Rate: $200.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
�•
Zone No. 26
Tract Name:
Maximum Rate: $270.00 Proposed Rate: $270.00
Ffract Numbers:
Traditions/Gallery Homes
1 29133
Zone No. 27 Maximum Rate: $70.00 Proposed Rate: $70.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Avondale
26828 26828-01 26828-02
Zone No. 28
Maximum
Rate:
00 Proposed
Rate:
$129.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Wolf Creek
29798
29798-01
29798-02
29798-03
29798-04
29798-05
29798-06
29798-07
29798-08
29798-09
30264
30264-01
30264-02
30264-03
30264-04
30264-05
30264-06
30264-07
30264-08
30264-09
30264-10
30264-11
30264-12
30264-13
30264-14
30264-15
31898
33125
32319
33124
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 13 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
3. District Services and Charges
Zone No. 29 0) I Maximum Rate: $519.58 I Proposed Rate: $519.58 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Gallery •. ,I FITI=
(4) Beginning Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the base rate for Zone 29 was $315.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zone 29 the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2026-2027 the adjustment is 3.28%, the annual increase in the CPI.
Zone No. 30 (1)(6) I Maximum Rate: $129.00 I Proposed Rate: $0.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
.. . .
(5) The maximum rate for Zone 30 is $129.00.
(6) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Zone No. 31 (7)(1) I Maximum Rate: $42.89 I Proposed Rate: $0.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Roripaugh Ranch
(7) Beginning Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the base rate for Zone 31 was $26.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zone 31, the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2026-2027 the adjustment is 3.28%, the annual increase in the CPI. (8) Zone 31 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Zone No. 32 (9)(10) I Maximum Rate: $980.77 I Proposed Rate: $0.00 VineyardTract Name: Tract Numbers:
-
(9) Beginning Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the base rate for Zone 32 was $640.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for Zone 32, the maximum rates as approved by the property owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2026-2027 the adjustment is 3.28%, the annual increase in the CPI. (10) Zone 32 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Service Level R, Road Maintenance
Service Level R provides funding for construction, improvement, service, and maintenance of unpaved public streets and roads within specific areas of the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited to, renovation or restoration due to damage, flood and drainage control, repairs and re -grading, and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services are spread among all parcels within various areas ("rate levels") of Service Level R in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the service level.
Service Level R currently has one (1) active rate level, Rate Level R-1. The area for Rate Level R-2 has been fully paved and therefore an assessment is currently not required. Only the parcels within Rate Level R-1 boundary area will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
RATE LEVEL R-1— This rate level consists of fifty-five (55) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for the servicing and maintenance of Kimberly Lane, Greenwood Lane, Liefer Road, Gatlin Road, and Pala Vista. A total of 1.546 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. The current maximum rates and charges in R-1 are $115.26 per single-family residential lot and $57.62 per vacant residential lot.
RATE LEVEL R-2 — This rate level consists of forty (40) assessable parcels that have direct access to Santiago Road. This area has been fully paved and no longer requires service under this District.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 14 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
3. District Services and Charges
Refuse/Recycling Collection
The Refuse/Recycling Collection Service Level provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection program, including recycling services for all developed residential homes (or "Households") within the District. The rate and charge for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Refuse/Recycling Collection is $382.33 per Household and will be applied to all parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 15 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
4. Changes to the District
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include but are not limited to, changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided, addition of new services or Service Levels, restructuring of the current Service Levels, inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels, or revisions to the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following.
Notable Previous Modifications to the District
Two Service Levels Replaced with a Special Tax
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997-1998 the below two Service Levels were replaced by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District.
• COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION — This service level provided for the maintenance, service, and operation of all public parks and recreation services within the City. • SERVICE LEVEL A, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING AND MEDIANS — This service level provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting, and landscaped medians along arterial streets.
Service Level R
As of Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the streets have been fully paved and there is no longer a need to assess for unpaved road maintenance (Rate level R-2).
Proposed Modifications to the District for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District may accept additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts would be included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development would be included in these two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally, individual residential parcels are included in the Refuse/Recycling Collection when a new single-family residential unit is identified, and service is ordered.
Service Level B
In Fiscal Year 2022-2023 the District conducted a successful Proposition 218 ballot proceeding and annexed 545 parcels into Service Level B. Another successful Proposition 218 ballot proceeding was conducted in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and an additional 138 parcels were annexed into Service Level B.
Service Level C
The annual revenue collected for the majority of the Zones in Service Level C is not sufficient to cover the costs to maintain these zones. Due to the rising costs, the District has had to reduce services to the maintenance of the perimeter landscaping for these zones. In Fiscal Year 2019-2020 the District conducted a Proposition 218 ballot proceeding to increase the assessment rates for Zones 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22 and 27. The majority of the ballots received were in opposition to the increased assessments in all zones, and the increase was therefore not applied. The assessment rates, for 27 of the 29 zones currently assessed in Service Level C, have not increased since the zones were established. Because the costs continue to increase and the assessments have stayed the same, the service will remain limited and may have to be reduced further due to limited annual funds.
In Fiscal Year 2020-2021 the District terminated the flood channel easements in Zone 7 therefore eliminating the need for maintenance of said areas. This action resulted in the termination of the assessment for only the sixteen (16) parcels affected, effective Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 16 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
4. Changes to the District
In December of 2020, the District initiated a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the maintenance services of the landscape areas in Service Level C. The new maintenance contract that was awarded and approved by the Board resulted in a reduction in the budgeted maintenance cost for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. The new contract was effective July 1, 2021.
There are no new inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping) proposed for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Service Level R
There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Road Maintenance) proposed for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Refuse/Recycling Collection
A total of 249 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and added to Refuse/Recycling Collection for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. New residential parcels are identified each year and included in Refuse/Recycling Collection based upon the waste hauler's updated service records.
The rate for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for Refuse/Recycling Collection is $382.33 per residential parcel. For Fiscal Year 2025-2026, the rate for this service was $363.68.
For more information, please refer to Section 2, Budgets and Levy Summary. The costs for the District represent actual service costs, as provided in the City's Franchise Agreement with CR&R Waste Services.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 17 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
5. Method of Apportionment
Method of Apportionment
The cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each eligible property.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting):
The following formula is used to calculate each property's Service Level B charges by the per parcel/unit (residential "lot/unit") method.
Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) _ (Total Residential Lots + Assigned Condominium Units) = Parcel Charge
Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Refuse/Recycling Collection:
The following formula is used to calculate each property's charges by the per parcel (residential "lot") method.
Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) / Total Residential Lots (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge Service Level R (Roads):
The charge per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels.
Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels
Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in Rate Level) = Parcel Charge The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
Table 5-1
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B
lit) Defined as Assigned Condominium Units in Service Level B for which the interior streetlights are privately maintained however, the Assigned Condominium Units benefit from perimeter or collector street lighting funded by Service Level B.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 18 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
5. Method of Apportionment
Table 5-2
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C
Residential Lot Zone No. 1
1.00 $116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 2
1.00 $89.00
$89.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 3
1.00 $116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 4
1.00 $46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 5
1.00 $175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 6 (12)
1.00 $145.58
$145.58
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 7
1.00 $89.00
$89.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 8
1.00 $175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 9
1.00 $46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 10
1.00 $116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 11
1.00 $175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 12
1.00 $116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 13
1.00 $46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 14
1.00 $89.00
$89.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 15
1.00 $175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 16
1.00 $175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 17
1.00 $46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 18
1.00 $70.00
$70.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 19
1.00 $225.00
$225.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 20
1.00 $175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 21
1.00 $129.00
$129.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 22
1.00 $116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 23
1.00 $20.00
$20.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 24
1.00 $100.00
$100.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 25
1.00 $200.00
$200.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 26
1.00 $270.00
$270.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 27
1.00 $70.00
$70.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 28
1.00 $129.00
$129.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 29 (12)
1.00 $519.58
$519.58
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 30 (13)
1.00 $129.00
$129.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 31 (12)(14)
1.00 $42.89
$0.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 32 (12)(14)
1.00 $980.77
$0.00
Per Parcel
(12) Beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zones 29 and 31 and beginning Fiscal Year 2009-10 for Zones 6 and 32, the maximum rates as approved by the property owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or
5.00%.
(13) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 has elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. (14) Zones 31 and 32 Zone 31 elected to have the perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zones will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 19 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
5. Method of Apportionment
Table 5-3
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level R
Single Family Residential Lot R-1
Vacant Residential Lot R-1
Table 5-4
Parcel Charge Calculation RE
1.00 $115.26
0.50 $115.26
Collection
(is) Developed residential parcels identified by CR&R for which refuse collections are available. $115.26 Per Parcel
$57.62 Per Parcel
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 20 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
6. Tax Roll
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 21 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
APPENDIX A
Tax Roll
(On file with the City Clerk)
Webb
MUNICIPAL FINANCE
Temecula Community Services District
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
(July 1, 2026 — June 30, 2027)
Levy and Collection of Rates and Charges
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) provides street lighting, perimeter landscaping, slope maintenance, unpaved street and road maintenance, and refuse collection services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are the same as those of the City of Temecula, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., or soon thereafter as practicable, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD") will hold a public hearing on the levy and collection of rates and charges within the TCSD on the property tax rolls for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED SERVICES FOR FY 2026-2027
Property owners in the City of Temecula only pay for the services used and made available to their property. All rates and charges are levied on an annual basis and collected along with property taxes. The services provided by the TCSD are divided into four Service Levels:
1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting. Operation, maintenance, utility costs and administration of residential streetlights. The established rates of $25.68 per Single Family Residential parcels and $12.84 per Condominium parcels are not proposed to increase from last year.
2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping. Operation, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration of all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. The rates for Zone 6 (Woodcrest Country) and Zone 29 (Gallery Portraits) will increase as approved by property owners. All other zones' rates are not proposed to increase from last year.
3. Service Level D — Recycling and Refuse Collection. Operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program for single-family dwellings. The proposed rate for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is $382.33.
4. Service Level R — Unpaved Road Maintenance. Operation and administration of certain unpaved streets and roads maintained by the TCSD. These rates are not proposed to increase from their approved per parcel rate of $115.26 per single-family residence and $57.62 per vacant residential property.
The TCSD rates and charges are based on the written report prepared in connection with the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 (the "Report"), which is on file with the District Secretary. A copy of the Report is available for public inspection at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
CHANGES FROM LAST YEAR
SERVICE LEVEL C - PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND SLOPE MAINTENANCE The following zones' rates will increase based on a CPI adjustment:
Zone 6 (Woodcrest Country) annual maximum assessment will increase from $140.95 to $145.58.
Zone 29 (Gallery Portraits) annual maximum assessment will increase from $503.09 to $519.59.
CHANGES FROM LAST YEAR - CONT-
SERVICE LEVEL D - RECYCLING AND REFUSE
An increase is proposed to the annual rate and charge for Service Level D (Refuse Collection/Recycling) from $363.68 to $382.33. The proposed rate adjustment is based on the combination of an increase in CPI, an increase in landfill tipping fees, an increase in Fund administrative costs, and a reduction in fund balance.
SERVICE LEVEL R - UNPAVED ROAD MAINTENANCE
For 2026-2027 the parcels will be assessed at the full rate in the amounts of $115.26 for improved parcels and $57.62 for unimproved parcels within Service Level R.
RATES AND CHARGES APPEAL PROCESS
Any property owner subject to the rates and charges who wants a review of the classification or application of the rate or charge to the owner's property or alleges that an error has been made with respect to the application of the rate or charge to the property, must file with the District Secretary a written appeal in accordance with District regulations prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2026. Any property owner subject to a rate and charge who believes that payment of all or a portion of the rate and charge would create a hardship for such property owner during Fiscal Year 2026-2027 must file with the District Secretary a written hardship appeal in accordance with District regulations prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2026, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program.
Appeal forms are available at City Hall.
TCSD BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 (JULY 1, 2026, TO JUNE 30, 2027) The proposed budget for the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is as follows:
Service Level B
Service Level C
Service Level D
Service Level R
Total
PUBLIC HEARING
$776,437
$1,740,469
$11,899,089
$10,434
$14,426,429
At the Public Hearing scheduled for July 28, 2026, at 3:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as practicable, the Board of Directors will review and consider any written protest received in person by the District Secretary at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590, prior to the scheduled hearing. The Board will also listen to public comments by all interested individuals concerning the proposed rates and charges of the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
QUESTIONS AND INQUIRIES
For general questions, please contact Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, Special Tax Consultants for the City of Temecula, at (800) 439-6553. The Temecula Community Services District is located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Thank you for taking the time to review this information and we are looking forward to serving you.
Item No. 15
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: July 28, 2026
SUBJECT: Approve Financial Statements for the 3rd Quarter Ended March 31, 2026 PREPARED BY: Catlin Dorset, Finance Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the financial statements for the 3rd quarter ended March 31, 2026.
BACKGROUND: The attached Financial Statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for the 3rd Quarter Ended March 31, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: SARDA Fund Summaries
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 380 - SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND
% Change
2025-26
Year to Date
2025-26 Q3
from
2024-25
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
3-31-2026
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Redevelopment Property Tax Fund
0 6,959,359
0 6,959,359
0 0.0
Distribution
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
195,373
165,629
109,218
165,629
0 0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
8,267,538
0 4,325,522
0 0
0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources
8,462,911
7,124,988
4,434,739
7,124,988
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
1,566,993
1,548,261
299,235
1,548,261
0 0.0
Debt Service - Principal
0 2,980,000
2,980,000
2,980,000
0 0.0
Debt Service - Interest
2,746,135
2,628,394
1,233,395
2,628,394
0 0.0
Transfers
250,000
250,000
0 250,000
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
4,563,128
7,406,655
4,512,630
7,406,655
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
3,899,782
(281,667)
(77,891)
(281,667)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
(34,291,959)
(30,392,177)
(30,392,177)
Fund Balance, End of Year
(30,392,177)
(30,673,844)
(30,673,844)
Fund Description
The Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) Debt Service Fund was established to account for payment obligations of the Successor Agency as a result of the State's dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies. This is a private -purpose
trust
fund that is used to account for resources held and administered by the SARDA acting in a fiduciary capacity
for other governments.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 381 - REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY TAX TRUST FUND
Change
2025-26 Year to Date 2025-26 Q3 from
2024-25 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 3-31-2026 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Redevelopment Property Tax Fund
7,259,554
0 3,345,372
0 0
0.0 Distribution
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
8,786
0 (4,350)
0 0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
7,268,340
0 3,341,022
0 0
0.0 Expenditures by Category
Transfers
8,267,538
0 4,325,522
0 0
0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
8,267,538
0 4,325,522
0 0
0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (999,197) 0 (984,500) 0 0 0.0 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
1,001,652 2,454 2,454
2,454 2,454 2,454
Item No. 16
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: July 28, 2026
SUBJECT: Authorize Fiscal Year 2026-27 Special Tax Levies for the Community Facilities Districts
PREPARED BY: Paula Majors, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 01-02
(HARVESTON)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-01
(CROWNE HILL)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02
(RORIPAUGH RANCH)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03 (WOLF
CREEK)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-06
(HARVESTON II)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01
(RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 19-01
(MUNICIPAL SERVICES)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS - MUNICIPAL SERVICES)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS - FACILITIES)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 23-02 (PRADO
— MUNICIPAL SERVICES)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 23-02 (PRADO -
FACILITIES)
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency on April 24, 2001. An Amendment was approved on November 10, 2015, to replace the Temecula Redevelopment Agency with the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, due to the Statewide dissolution of all redevelopment agencies, effective February 1, 2012. In addition, the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Housing Authority were added as parties to the Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement.
The special tax levy for each CFD is calculated each year based on the formula established in the Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA), established when the CFD was formed. The special tax levy funds the debt service payments, administrative costs or municipal services which are detailed in the attached Budget Reports for each CFD. The amount of the levies fluctuate each year due to changes in delinquency rates, debt service amounts, or administrative charges.
The special tax levies required for Fiscal Year 2026-27, as calculated by the City's special tax consultant, Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, are summarized in the following table.
Original
Issue
Original Outstanding
FY 25-26
FY 26-27
Name
AmountIssue
Issue of
• Prior
Date
Amount• 1 •
Levy
Levy
Year
Harveston
$17,310,000 T S7,540,000
$941,534.92
$932,018.75
($9,516.17)
CFD 01-02 Sp. TaxA
8/29/2002
Harveston
This is a non -bonded special tax
established for the ongoing maintenance
$259,292.95
$261,915.78
$2,622.83
CFD 01-02 Sp. TaxB
of Harveston Lake.
Crowne Hill
8/7/2003
$12,155,000
CFD 03-01 Ser. A
$5,830,000
$780,910.24
$781,415.55
$505.31
Crowne Hill
8/24/2005
$3,865,000
CFD 03-01 Ser. B
Roripaugh Ranch
4/27/2006
$51,250,000
$5,990,000
$735,930.92
$719,561.33
($16,369.59)
CFD 03-02
Wolf Creek
1/8/2004
$30,990,000
$10,660,000
$1,641,243.08
$1,636,212.76
($5,030.32)
CFD 03-03
Harveston II
9/9/2004
$4,845,000
$2,010,000
$308,264.06
$302,392.45
($5,871.61)
CFD 03-06
Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2
$42,815,000
$42,065,000
$3,438,575.88
$3,401,589.47
($36,986.41)
CFD 16-01 - Special Tax
3/16/2017
This is a non -bonded special tax
Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2
established to pay for ongoing municipal
$725,929.71
$841,854.30
$115,924.59
CFD 16-01-Special Tax
services provided to this district.
This is a non -bonded special tax
1/8/2019
Municipal Services
established to pay for ongoing municipal
$157,495.79
$166,317.60
$8,821.81
CFD 19-01
services provided to this district.
This is a non -bonded special tax
HeioomFam�s
established to pay for ongoing municipal
$183,222.87
$193,480.55
$10,257.68
CFD 20-01 (Services)
services provided to this district.
3/13/2024
FHeirloomFamis
$12,695,000
$12,480,000
$759,204.79
$764,786.32
$5,581.53
CFD 20-01 (Facilities)
This is a non -bonded special tax
Prado
established to pay for ongoing municipal
$0.00
$81,494.14
$81,494.14
CFD 23-02 (Services)
services provided to this district.
10/23/2025
Prado
$16,655,000 $16,655,000
$712,463.89
$871,449.95
$158,986.06
CFD 23-02 (Facilities)
FISCAL IMPACT: The calculated special tax levy required for the 2026-27 Fiscal Year is listed in the preceding table.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. CFD 01-02 Resolution - Harveston
2. CFD 01-02 Budget — Series A -Harveston
3. CFD 01-02 Budget — Series B-Harveston
4. CFD 03-01 Resolution - Crowne Hill
5. CFD 03-01 Budget - Crowne Hill
6. CFD 03-02 Resolution - Roripaugh Ranch
7. CFD 03-02 Budget - Roripaugh Ranch
8. CFD 03-03 Resolution - Wolf Creek
9. CFD 03-03 Budget -Wolf Creek
10. CFD 03-06 Resolution - Harveston II
11. CFD 03-06 Budget - Harveston II
12. CFD 16-01 Resolution - Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2
13. CFD 16-01 Exhibit A - Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2
14. CFD 16-01 Budget - Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2
15. CFD 19-01 Resolution - Municipal Services
16. CFD 19-01 Resolution — Exhibit A - Municipal Services
17. CFD 19-01 Budget - Municipal Services
18. CFD 20-01 Resolution - Heirloom Farms — Municipal
Services
19. CFD 20-01 Exhibit A - Heirloom Farms — Municipal Services
20. CFD 20-01 Budget - Heirloom Farms — Municipal Services
21. CFD 20-01 Resolution - Heirloom Farms — Facilities
22. CFD 20-01 Budget - Heirloom Farms — Facilities
23. CFD 23-02 Resolution - Prado — Municipal Services
24. CFD 23-02 Exhibit A - Prado — Municipal Services
25. CFD 23-02 Budget — Prado — Municipal Services
26. CFD 23-02 Resolution - Prado- Facilities
27. CFD 23-02 Budget - Prado- Facilities
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 01-02
(HARVESTON)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 01-02 (Harveston) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello - Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 02-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 02-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 02-01, there is to be levied a special tax of $932,018.75 for Special Tax A and $261,915.78 for Special Tax B on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026- 27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. Special Tax A and B as set forth above do not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 02-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 02-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax A levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items:
A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness.
B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary.
C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 02-03 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 01-2 (Harveston Special Tax A)" and "CFD No. 01-2 (Harveston Special Tax B)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Jessica Alexander, Chair
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
City of Temecula
CFD 01-02 Special Tax A (Harveston)
2016 Special Tax Refunding Bonds
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
2025-26
2026-27
Item Levy
Levy
Difference Note/Comment
March Interest Due
$176,843.75
$162,093.75
($14,750.00)
September Interest Due
$176,843.75
$162,093.75
($14,750.00)
September Principal Due
$590,000.00
$615,000.00
$25,000.00
Total Debt Service
$943,687.50
$939,187.50
($4,500.00)
Administration
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Itern
Trustee/Paying Agent
2025-26
Rate
Levy
$3,850.00
2026-27
Rate
Levy
$3,850.00
Consultant Services
$7,266.16
$7,411.49
$145.33
Auditor -Controller (per Fund, No enrollment fee) Itl
$96.14
$96.14
$0.00
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$178.75
$0.11
$178.75
$0.00
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$406.25
$0.25
$406.25
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$1,609.00
$1,609.00
$0.00
Administration Expenses
$180.00
$180.00
$0.00
Other Costs
Total Administration
$0.00
$0.00
$13,731.63
$0.00
$145.33
$13,586.30
Other
Difference
_ $0.00
$0.00
Note/Comment
Item
Reserve Adjustment
Levy Levy
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Delinquency Allowance
5% Delinquency Allowance Met
Delinquency Charges
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Totals
Levy
Levy Note/Comment
DifferenceItern
Total Requirement
$957,273.80 $952,919.13 ($4,354.67)
District Adjustment
($15,728.17) ($20,900.38) $5,172.21 Credit due to surplus funds Enrollment Adjustment
($10.71)
Total Levy
$941,534.92 $932,018.75 ($9,516.17)
Factors:
Levy % Difference
Administration %of Levy
City's % of Levy
Maximum Authorized Tax
Levy % of Maximum Tax
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
Final Maturity
1.01%
1.47%
0.17%
$2,245,840.32
41.50%
$7,540,000
1.30%
1.96%
1,625
1,625
2036
It1 Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
Bonds call protected until 9/1/2026
City of Temecula
CFD 01-02 Special Tax B (Harveston)
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Services CFD (No DSS)
Maintenance & Services
2025-26 2026-27
Itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Park Maintenance $257,526.22 $260,056.80 $2,530.59
Total Maintenance and Services $257,526.22 $260,056.80 $2,530.59 Administration
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Itern
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee)
2025-26
Rate Levy
$96.14
2026-27
Rate Levy
$96.14
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$213.95
$0.11
$233.09
$19.14
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$486.25
$0.25
$529.75
$43.50
City Administrative Costs
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$0.00
Other Costs
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Administration
$1,796.34
$1,858.98
$62.64
Other
Difference
$0.00
Itern
Reserve Adjustment
2025-26 2026-27
Levy Levy
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
Delinquency Charges
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Totals
r2026-27
Item Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Total Requirement $259,322.56 $261,915.78 $2,593.23 1% annual increase per RMA District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Enrollment Adjustment ($29.61)
Total Levy $259,292.95 $261,915.78 $2,622.84
Factors:
Levy % Difference
1.01%
Administration %of Levy
0.71%
City's % of Levy
0.38%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$261,915.78
Levy % of Maximum Tax
100.00%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
N/A
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
1.10%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
1.65%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
1,945
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
2,119
Final Maturity
N/A
(t) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
Max tax increases 1% per year
174 Prado parcels to be newly taxed
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-01
(CROWNE HILL)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 03-01 (Crowne Hill) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 03-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 03-05 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $781,415.55 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 03-05 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items:
A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness.
B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary.
C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 03-05 the Indenture of Trust for the CFD and the Act.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-1 (Crowne Hill)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Jessica Alexander, Chair
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
City of Temecula
CFD 03-01 (Crowne Hill)
Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 and Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
Item
Series 2012
Series 2017
Series 2012
Series 2017
Difference Note/Comment
March Interest Due
$107,625.00
$29,618.75
$98,125.00
$29,218.75
($9,900.00)
September Interest Due
$107,625.00
$29,618.75
$98,125.00
$29,218.75
($9,900.00)
$25,000.00
$5,200.00
September Principal Due
$475,000.00
$40,000.00 $500,000.00 $40,000.00
Total Debt Service
$690,250.00 $99,237.50 $696,250.00 $98,437.50
Administration
Item Rate
Trustee/Paying Agent
Levy
$4,200.00
Rate
Levy
$4,200.00
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Consultant Services
$7,266.16
$7,411.49
$145.33
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee)
$96.14
$96.14
$87.56
$0.00
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$87.56
$0.11
$0.00
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$199.00
$0.25
$199.00
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$2,609.00
$2,609.00
$0.00
Administration Expenses
$160.00
$160.00
$0.00
Other Costs
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Administration
$14,617.86
$14,763.19
$145.33
Totals
2025-26 2026-27
�Item
Difference Note/Comment
$5,345.33
$4,846.31 Credit due to surplus funds
Levy Levy
Total Requirement $804,105.36 $809,450.69
District Adjustment
($23,188.83) ($28,035.14)
Enrollment Adjustment
($6.29)
Actual Levy
$780,910.24 $781,415.55
$505.31
Note/Comment
Levy % Difference
0.06%
Administration % of Levy
1.89%
City's % of Levy
0.33%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$2,003,682.40
Levy % of Maximum Tax
39.00%
Series 2012 Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026 $4,025,000 Series 2017 Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026 $1,805,000 Total Bonds Outstanding $5,830,000
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025 3.32%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026 4.63%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied 796
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy 796
Final Maturity 2035
(1) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02
(RORIPAUGH RANCH)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 05-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 05-01 and Ordinance No. TPFA 05-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $719,561.33 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 05-01 and Ordinance No. TPFA 05-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items:
A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness.
B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary.
C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 05-01 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-2 (Roripaugh Ranch)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Jessica Alexander, Chair
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
City of Temecula
CFD 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch)
2017 Special Tax Refunding Bonds
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
2025-26
2026-27
Item
Levy
Levy
Difference
March Interest Due
$133,728.13
$121,978.13
($11,750.00)
September Interest Due
$133,728.13
$121,978.13
($11,750.00)
September Principal Due
$470,000.00
$495,000.00
$25,000.00
$1,500.00
Total Debt Service $737,456.26
$738,956.26
Administration
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Item
Trustee/Paying Agent
2025-26
Rate Levy
$6,000.00
2026-27
Rate Levy
$6,000.00
Consultant Services
$7,266.16
$7,411.49
$145.33
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee)
$96.14
$96.14
$0.00
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$55.88
$0.11
$55.88
$0.00
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$127.00
$0.25
$127.00
$0.00
Delinquency Management
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$2,609.00
$2,609.00
$0.00
Administration Expenses
$215.00
$215.00
$0.00
Other Costs
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Administration
$16,369.18
$16,514.51
$145.33
Totals
2025-26 2026-27
DifferenceItem . -
$1,645.33
Total Requirement
Levy L Levy
$753,825.44 $755,470.77
District Adjustment
($17,888.36)
($35,909.44)
$18,021.08
($16,369.59)
Credit due to surplus funds
Enrollment Adjustment
($6.16)
Actual Levy
$735,930.92
1 $719,561.33
Factors:
Levy % Difference
-2.22%
Administration % of Levy
2.30%
City's % of Levy
0.36%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$1,462,413.85
Levy % of Maximum Tax
49.20%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
$5,990,000
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
1.23%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
2.37%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
508
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
508
Final Maturity 2036
(1) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
CFD is fully developed
Bonds call protected until 9/1/2025
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03
(WOLF CREED
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello - Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 03-02 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 03-22 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-02, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $1,636,212.76 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 03-22 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-2 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items:
A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness.
B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary.
C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 03-22 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-3 (Wolf Creek)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 281h day of July, 2026.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Jessica Alexander, Chair
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
City of Temecula
CFD 03-03 (Wolf Creek)
2022 Special Tax Refunding Bonds
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
March Interest Due
September Interest Due
September Principal Due
Total Debt Service
Administration
1 Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Item
Trustee/Paying Agent
r2026-27
Rate Levy
$2,445.00
Rate Levy
$2,445.00
Consultant Services
$7,266.16
$7,411.49
$145.33
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee)
$96.14
$96.14
$0.00
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$198.66
$0.11
$198.66
$0.00
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$451.50
$0.25
$451.50
$0.00
Delinquency Management
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$2,609.00
$2,609.00
$0.00
Administration Expenses
$150.00
$150.00
$0.00
Other Costs
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Administration
$13,216.46
$13,361.79
1 $145.33
Other
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Item
Reserve Adjustment
2025-26
Levy
$0.00
2026-27
Levy
$0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
5% Delinquency Allowance Met
Delinquency Charges
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Tota I s
Difference Note/Comment
$2,145.33
Itern Levy Levy
Total Requirement $1,659,216.46 $1,661,361.79
District Adjustment ($17,955.04) ($25,149.03)
Enrollment Adjustment ($18.34)
Actual Levy $1,641,243.08 $1,636,212.76
($7,193.99)
Credit due to surplus funds
($5,030.32)
Factors:
Levy % Difference
-0.31%
Administration % of Levy
0.82%
City's % of Levy
0.16%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$2,756,688.40
Levy % of Maximum Tax
59.35%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
$10,660,000
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
0.93%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
1.44%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
1,806
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
1,806
Final Maturity
2034
I'I Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
Bonds refunded in June 2022
Bonds call protected until maturity
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-06
(HARVESTON II)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 03-06 (Harveston II) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 03-03 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 03-27 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-03, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $302,392.45 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 03-27 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-03, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items:
A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness.
B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary.
C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 03-27 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-6 (Harveston II)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Jessica Alexander, Chair
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
City of Temecula
CFD 03-06 (Harveston 11)
Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
2025-26
2026-27
Item
Levy
Levy
Difference Note/Comment
March Interest Due
$46,878.13
$42,678.13
($4,200.00)
September Interest Due
$46,878.13
$42,678.13
($4,200.00)
September Principal Due
$210,000.00
$215,000.00
$5,000.00
Total Debt Service
$303,756.26
$300,356.26
($3,400.00)
Administration
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Itern
Trustee/Paying Agent
Rate Levy
$2,195.00
Rate Levy
$2,195.00
Consultant Services
$7,266.16
$7,411.49
$145.33
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee)
$96.14
$96.14
$0.00
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$138.71
$0.11
$138.71
$0.00
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$315.25
$0.25
$315.25
$0.00
Delinquency Management
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$2,609.00
$2,609.00
$0.00
Administration Expenses
$150.00
$150.00
$0.00
Other Costs
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Administration
$12,770.26
$12,915.59
$145.33
Other
Difference Note/Comment
$0.00
Itern
Reserve Adjustment
Levy L Levy
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
5% Delinquency Allowance Met
Delinquency Charges
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Totals
2025-26 2026-27
Item Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Total Requirement $316,526.52 $313,271.85 ($3,254.67)
District Adjustment ($8,248.02) ($10,879.40) $2,631.38 Credit due to surplus funds Enrollment Adjustment ($14.44)
Actual Levy $308,264.06 $302,392.45 ($5,871.61)
Factors:
Levy % Difference
-1.90%
Administration %of Levy
4.27%
City's % of Levy
0.86%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$443,181.75
Levy % of Maximum Tax
68.23%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
$2,010,000
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
1.59%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
2.26%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
1,261
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
1,261
Final Maturity 2034
(t) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01
(RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 16-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 16-04 and Ordinance No. TPFA 16-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $3,401,589.47 for Special Tax A and $841,854.30 for Special Tax B on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. Special Tax A and B as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 16-04 and Ordinance No. TPFA 16-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of Special Tax A and B shall be used in accordance with the eligible uses listed on the attached Exhibit A.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 - Special Tax A)" and "CFD No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 - Special Tax B)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special
tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
Jessica Alexander, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01
(RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2)
DESCRIPTION OF CFD 03-02 SPECIAL TAXES TO BE PREPAID, AND
FACILITIES AND SERVICES TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT
CFD 03-02 SPECIAL TAX PREPAYMENT
The special taxes to be prepaid are those being levied for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) on property to be included in the District, with the prepayment to be in an amount as necessary to repay the portion of the indebtedness of such community facilities district secured by such special taxes.
FACILITIES
It is intended that the District will finance all or a portion of the costs of the following facilities:
Butterfield Stage,Road
Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from La Serena to Rancho California Road:
Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signals including a new traffic signal at La Serena and signal modifications at Rancho California Road, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Butterfield Stage Road.
Nicolas Road
Nicolas Road BSR to the Easterly Metropolitan Water District (MWD) R/W:
Improvements include grading right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, split rail fence, street lights, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, underground sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road.
Nicolas Road from the Easterly MWD R/W to Liefer Road including construction of Calle Garisol realignment to Nicolas Road:
Improvements include grading partial right-of-way (40' travel way) with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, utility relocations, traffic detour, split rail fence, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, sewer, storm drain, bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek (including channel lining and transition structure to bridge), access road, exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road.
I herebj;certity 66dir the penalty os,periury, Mat she
above and toreg6ng is a IN a jld QDr(ki,. ai,an
A-1 itt en the r I ds or the ON of
Temecula,% I day of 1r,r ' ,� 20�.
RANDI JO OLsoN, JD.:MMC, CITY CL RK
By.
Long'Vallgy'Channel`.
Long Valley Channel from BSR to the Easterly Project Boundary:
Improvements include grading of channel, flow -by detention basin, construction of drop structures, trapezoidal channel lining, transition structures to Butterfield Stage Road Bridge, rip -rap, grading and paving of access roads, fencing, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Long Valley Channel.
Santa Gertrudis Creek
Santa Gertrudis Creek from the Habitat Area to the exit channel at MWD RAW:
11 Improvements include a flow -by detention basin, headwalls, trapezoidal channel lining and transition structures; grading, fencing and paving for access roads; desilting and detention basins, rip -rap protection, rip -rap dissipaters, berms, grading of exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Santa Gertrudis Creek.
EnvironmentaWitigation
Mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements:
Creation of 8.2 acres of habitat within open space to include grading, access road, electrical service, irrigation, plant and seed installation and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete resource agency conditioned environmental mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements.
6 Sports Park
Sports Park at the SE corner of the intersection of Loop Road and BSR:
Construct 19.7-acre Sports Park including grading, parking, building, lighting landscaping, irrigation, playing fields, basketball courts, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Sports Park.
Loop Road
Loop Road from North BSR intersection to South BSR intersection (public section only):
Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the Loop Road East of BSR.
The Facilities shall include the acquisition of right-of-way, the costs of design, engineering and planning, the costs of any environmental or traffic studies, surveys or other reports, the cost of any required environmental mitigation and any required noise mitigation measures, landscaping and irrigation, soils testing, permits, plan check and inspection fees, insurance, legal and related overhead costs, coordination and supervision and any other costs or appurtenances related to any of the foregoing.
t hereby cer1!N,i. nder Uie.'Oenalty oLperjury I,hat the:
above and:loregorng �s a Irwe and correct copy of an
A-2 original on-depo q within lie r rds of the Cityof
Temeaiia, this - day ot- r 2Q .
"W01 L,OLSON' ib, mMc, ci CL RK
i� _
SERVICES
Is it intended that the District be eligible to fund all or a portion of the costs of the following muriicip!l services:
• Public safety services, including police and fire protection, provided to the area within the District.
• Maintenance of landscaping in public areas, public easements and public right of way in the area of the District, including along or near Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, Skyview Park, the Sports Park, such maintenance to include but not be limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bioretention filters, multipurpose trails, and the furnishing of water for irrigation.
Maintenance of sidewalks in the area of the District, including Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road.
Maintenance of public signage in the District, including signage along Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road.
Maintenance of storm drainage systems within the area of the District, including those along or adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, and including storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection.
Maintenance of streets and roadways within the area of the District, including Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, and including slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street sweeping.
• Maintenance of street lighting located within the District, including street lights along Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, and including decorative lighting and pull box assemblies.
• Maintenance of traffic signals within the District, including traffic signals in or near Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and including electrical, LED replacement, maintenance and replacement,
Graffiti removal from public improvements within the District.
The District may fund any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements, the furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy, for any lights or irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining equipment, apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus, facilities or fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary for such maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to provide the I hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the above and foregoing is a true and correciicopy'Of an
A-3 original on deposi wRhm the r rds of the City of
Temecula; this�krdaY of
RANDI J oI SON,_JD. MMC CITY
B •6.
City of Temecula
CFD 16-01 (Roripauah Ranch Phase 2) Facilities
Special Tax Bonds, Series 2017, Series 2023A, and Series 2023B Bonds Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
r
Itern
Series 2017
Series 2023r202P
Difference Note/Comment
March Interest Due
$1,130,775.00
$149,000.00
$1,107,262.50
$148,875.00
($23,637.50)
($23,637.50)
September Interest Due
$1,130,775.00 $149,000.00
$1,107,262.50 $148,875.00
September Principal Due
$855,000.00
$5,000.00
$900,000.00
$10,000.00
$50,000.00
$2,725.00
Total Debt Service
$3,116,550.00 $303,000.00
$3,114,525.00 $307,750.00
Administration
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
Itern
Trustee/Paying Agent
Rate
Levy
$2,500.00
Rate
Levy
$2,500.00
Consultant Services
$7,266.16
$7,411.49
$145.33
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee)
$96.14
$96.14
$0.00
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$150.81
$0.11
$148.72
($2.09)
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$342.75
$0.25
$338.00
($4.75)
Delinquency Management
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$8,457.00
$8,457.00
$0.00
Administration Expenses
$215.00
$215.00
$0.00
Other Costs
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Administration
$19,027.86
$19,166.35
$138.49
Other
Difference Note/Comment
$0.00
Item
Reserve Adjustment
Levy
$0.00
Levy
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
$0.00 5% Delinquency Allowance Met
Delinquency Charges
$0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Tota I s 2025-26 EO.
Itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Total Requirement $3,438,577.86 $3,441,441.35 $2,863.49 District Adjustment $0.00 ($39,851.88) $39,851.88 Credit due to surplus funds Enrollment Adjustment ($1.98)
Actual Levy $3,438,575.88 $3,401,589.47 ($36,986.41)
Factors:
Levy % Difference
-1.08%
Administration % of Levy
0.56%
City's % of Levy
0.25%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$4,929,018.80
Levy % of Maximum Tax
69.01%
Series 2017 Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
$36,110,000
Series 2023 Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
$5,955,000
Total Bonds Outstanding
$42,065,000
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
2.36%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
3.38%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
1,371
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
1,352
Final Maturity
2053
Note/Comment
Parcel count decreased as only Developed Property
is taxed for FY 2026-27
Bonds call protected until 9/1/2027
I'I Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
City of Temecula
CFD 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) Services
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Services CFD (No DSS)
Public Safety and Maintenance Services
2025-26 2026-27
itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Public Safety and Maintenance Services $724,364.42 $840,271.44 $115,907.02 Total Public Safety and Maintenance Services $724,364.42 $840,271.44 1 $115,907.02 Administration
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollmentfe
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
City Administrative Costs
Other Costs
Total Administration
$148.72 $0.11 $148.72 $0.00
$338.00 $0.25 $338.00 $0.00
$1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$1,582.86 $1,582.86 $0.00
Other
Difference
$0.00
itern
Reserve Adjustment
2025-26 2026-27
Levy Levy
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
Delinquency Charges
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Totals
r2026-27
itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Total Requirement $725,947.28 $841,854.30 $115,907.02
District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Enrollment Adjustment ($17.57)
Total Levy $725,929.71 $841,854.30 $115,924.59
Factors:
Levy % Difference
15.97%
Administration %of Levy
0.19%
City's % of Levy
0.12%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$841,854.30
Levy % of Maximum Tax
100.00%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
N/A
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
2.49%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
3.28%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
1,204
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
1,352
Final Maturity
N/A
(t) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
148 new permits for FY 2026-27
Rates increase greater of 2% or CPI per year
CPI increased 3.28%
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 19-01
(MUNICIPAL SERVICES)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 19-01 (Municipal Services) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 19-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 19-01 and Ordinance No. TPFA 19-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $166,317.60 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 19-01 and Ordinance No. TPFA 19-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used in accordance with the Municipal Services listed on the attached Exhibit A.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 19-01 (Municipal Services)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing
responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
Jessica Alexander, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 19-01
(MUNICIPAL SERVICES)
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
AND RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
ELIGIBLE TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT
SERVICES
The services to be financed, in whole or in part, by the community facilities district (the "District') include the following:
• Public safety services, including police protection, fire protection and suppression, services, and ambulance and paramedic services.
• Maintenance of landscaping in public areas, public easements and public right of way, such maintenance to include but not be limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bio-retention filters, multipurpose trails, and the furnishing of water for irrigation. • Maintenance of sidewalks in or near to the area of the District.
Maintenance of public signage in or near the District.
Maintenance of storm protection and drainage systems within or serving the area of the District including but not limited to storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection.
Maintenance of streets and roadways within or in the vicinity of the District, including but not limited to slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street sweeping.
Maintenance of street lighting located within or in the vicinity of the District, including but not limited to street lights, decorative lighting and pull box assemblies.
Maintenance of traffic signals within and in the vicinity of the District, including but not limited to electrical, LED replacement, maintenance and replacement.
Maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways and open space.
Graffiti removal from public improvements within and in the area of the District. • Maintenance of water and sewer systems with an estimated useful life of five or more years and serving the area in or in the general area of the District and owned by the Temecula Public Financing Authority or by another local agency pursuant to a joint community facilities agreement or a joint exercise of powers agreement adopted pursuant to Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code.
A-1
The District may finance any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements, the furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy for any lights or irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining equipment, apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus, facilities or fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary for such maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to provide the services, payment of insurance costs and other related expenses and the provision of reserves for repairs and replacements and for the future provision of services. It is expected that the services will be provided by the City of Temecula (the "City"), either with its own employees or by contract with third parties, or any combination thereof.
The services to be financed by the District are in addition to those provided in the territory of the District before the date of creation of the District and will not supplant services already available within that territory when the District is created.
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
The administrative expenses to be financed by the District include the direct and indirect expenses incurred by the Authority and the City in carrying out their respective duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of attorneys, any fees of the County of Riverside related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and City staff directly related thereto and a proportionate amount of the Authority's and the City's general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority and the City from its respective general fund with respect to the District or the services authorized to be financed by the District, and expenses incurred by the Authority and the City in undertaking action to foreclose on properties for which the payment of special taxes is delinquent, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority and City in any way related to the District.
OTHER
The incidental expenses that may be financed by the District include, in addition to the administrative expenses identified above, the payment or reimbursement to the Authority, the City and any owner of land in the District of all costs associated with the establishment of the District.
A-2
City of Temecula
CFD 19-01 (Municipal Services)
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Services CFD (No DSS)
Public Safety and Maintenance Services
2025-26 2026-27
Itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Municipal Services _ $149,736.02 1 $158,456.53 $8,720.50 Total Municipal Services $149,736.02 1 $158,456.53 $8,770.50 Administration
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment
Consultant Services
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollmentfe
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
City Administrative Costs
Other Costs
Total Administration
Other
Reserve Adjustment
Delinquency Allowance
Delinquency Charges
Less: Prior Year Surplus
Total Other
Totals
Total Requirement
District Adjustment
Enrollment Adjustrr
Total Levy
$4,968.36
$5,067.73
$99.37
$26.95
$0.11
$26.95
$0.00
$61.25
$0.25
$61.25
$0.00
$2,609.00
$2,609.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$7,761.70
$7,861.07
$99.37
$0.00
$0.00
$0.010 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
.72 $166,317.60 1 1 $8,819.87
.00 $0.00
.93)
.79 $166,317.60 $8,821.80
Factors:
Levy % Difference
5.60%
Administration %of Levy
4.73%
City's % of Levy
1.57%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$166,317.60
Levy % of Maximum Tax
100.00%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
N/A
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
1.16%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
1.63%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
245
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
245
Final Maturity
N/A
(1) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
Rates increase 5.6% per year
CFD is fully developed
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS - MUNICIPAL SERVICES)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms - Municipal Services) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 2021-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $193,480.55 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 21-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used in accordance with the Municipal Services listed on the attached Exhibit A.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms — Municipal Services)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax
installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Jessica Alexander, Chair
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT It is proposed that the District be eligible to finance all or a portion of the costs of the following facilities:
The acquisition and construction of: streets (including paving, aggregate base, striping and traffic marking, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways), including Temecula Center Drive and Ynez Road within and in the vicinity of the District; stormwater drainage systems (including storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, junctions, manholes, catch basins and related dewatering); street light improvements (including light fixtures, substructures, conduits and service points of connection); and street signage (including traffic, stop and street name signs).
The foregoing are to include the acquisition of any related right-of-way and other land needed for the installation of any such improvements, demolition of existing structures and site leveling needed for the installation of any such improvements, erosion control, and other appurtenances.
• The acquisition and installation of traffic signal improvements, including traffic signal interconnection and video surveillance systems, at the intersection of Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive.
• Landscaping improvements in the public right of way along or in the vicinity of Temecula Center Drive, Date Street and Ynez Road, including related appurtenances. • Capital improvements included in the City of Temecula's adopted Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2021-2025.
• School improvements to be designated by the Temecula Valley Unified School District, which may include construction of buildings, equipping of school facilities, and acquisition of support and other appurtenances with a useful life of five years or more.
Sewer system improvements to be designated by the Eastern Municipal Water District.
The Facilities include the acquisition of right-of-way, the costs of design, engineering and planning, the costs of any environmental or traffic studies, surveys or other reports, the cost of any required environmental mitigation and any required noise mitigation measures, landscaping and irrigation, soils testing, permits, plan check and inspection fees, insurance, legal and related overhead costs, coordination and supervision and any other costs or appurtenances related to any of the foregoing.
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
It is proposed that the District be eligible to fund all or a portion of the costs of the following municipal services:
• Public safety services, including police and fire protection.
A-1
• Maintenance of parks, and landscaping in public areas, public easements and public right of way in or near the area of the District, such maintenance to include but not be limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bioretention filters, multipurpose trails, and the furnishing of water for irrigation.
• Maintenance of public signage in or near the District. • Maintenance of storm drainage systems within or serving the area of the District, and including storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection. • Maintenance of sidewalks, streets and roadways within or in the vicinity of the area of the District, and including slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street sweeping.
• Maintenance of street lighting located within or in the vicinity of the District, and including decorative lighting and pull box assemblies.
• Maintenance of traffic signals, and traffic interconnection and video surveillance systems, within and in the vicinity of the District, and including electrical, LED replacement, maintenance and replacement.
• Graffiti removal from public improvements within and in the area of the District.
The District may fund any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements, the furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy, for any lights or irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining equipment, apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus, facilities or fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary for such maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to provide the services, payment of insurance costs and other related expenses. The District may also provide for the reimbursement to the City of Temecula to the extent that the City of Temecula advances funds to pay for any of the foregoing services, and may fund reserves for repairs and replacements and for future expected costs of services. It is expected that the services will be provided by the City of Temecula, either with its own employees or by contract with third parties, or any combination thereof.
The services to be financed by the District shall be in addition to those provided in the territory of the District before the date of creation of the District, and will not supplant services already available within that territory when the District is created.
OTHER
The District may also finance any of the following:
1. Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, appraisal and price point study costs, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond and disclosure counsel fees and expenses, landowner counsel fees and expenses, and all other incidental expenses related to any special tax bonds (the 'Bonds') issued for the District.
2. Administrative fees of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the Bond trustee or fiscal agent related to the District and the Bonds.
A-2
3. Reimbursement of costs related to the formation of the District advanced by the Authority, the City of Temecula, any landowner in the District, or any party related to any of the foregoing, as well as reimbursement of any costs advanced by the Authority, the City of Temecula, any landowner in the District or any party related to any of the foregoing, for facilities, fees or other purposes or costs of the District.
A-3
City of Temecula
CFD 20-01 (Heirloom Farms)
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Services CFD (No DSS)
Public Safety and Maintenance Services
2025-26 2026-27
itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Public Safety and Maintenance Services $182,017.43 $192,268.85 $10,251.42 Total Public Safety and Maintenance Services $182,017.43 $192,268.85 $10,751.42 Administration
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollmentfe
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
City Administrative Costs
Other Costs
Total Administration
$80.25
$0.25
$80.25
$0.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,211.70
$1,211.70
$0.00
Other
Difference
$0.00
itern
Reserve Adjustment
2025-26 2026-27
Levy Levy
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
Delinquency Charges
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Totals
r2026-27
itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Total Requirement $183,229.13 $193,480.55 $10,251.42
District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Enrollment Adjustment ($6.26)
Total Levy $183,222.87 $193,480.55 $10,257.68
Factors:
Levy % Difference
5.60%
Administration %of Levy
0.63%
City's % of Levy
0.52%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$193,480.55
Levy % of Maximum Tax
100.00%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
N/A
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
3.58%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
2.34%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
321
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
321
Final Maturity
N/A
(t) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
CFD is fully developed
Rates increase 5.6% per year
Max tax is $602.74 per parcel for FY 2026-27
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS - FACILITIES)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms - Facilities) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 2021-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $764,786.32 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 21-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth in the CFD Report, and used for the payment of administrative costs, eligible facilities, and incidental expenses of the CFD, and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
Jessica Alexander, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
City of Temecula
CFD 20-01 (Heirloom Farms)
Special Tax Bonds 2024
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
r2026-27
Itern
Levy
Levy
Difference Note/Comment
March Interest Due
$314,875.00
$312,000.00
($2,875.00)
September Interest Due
$314,875.00
$312,000.00
($2,875.00)
September Principal Due
$115,000.00
$125,000.00
$10,000.00
Total Debt Service
$744,750.00
$749,000.00
$4,250.00
Administration
Itern
Trustee/Paying Agent
r2026-27
Rate Levy
$2,500.00
Rate Levy
Difference
$0.00
Note/Comment
$2,500.00
Consultant Services
$7,266.16
$7,411.49
$145.33
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) I
$96.14
$96.14
$0.00
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$35.31
$0.11
$35.31
$0.00
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$80.25
$0.25
$80.25
$0.00
Delinquency Management
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$8,457.00
$8,457.00
$0.00
Administration Expenses
$150.00
$150.00
$0.00
Other Costs
Total Administration
$0.00
$18,584.86
$0.00
$0.00
$18,730.19
$145.33
Other
Difference
$0.00
$0.00
Note/Comment
5% Delinquency Allowance Met
Itern
Reserve Adjustment
r2026-27
Levy
$0.00
Levy
$0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
$0.00
Delinquency Charges
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
Total Other
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Totals
r2026-27
Itern
Total Requirement
Levy Levy Difference
$763,334.86 $767,730.19 $4,395.33
District Adjustment
($4,126.85) ($2,943.87) ($1,182.98)
Enrollment Adjustment
($3.22)
Actual Levy
$759,204.79 $764,786.32 $5,581.53
Levy % Difference
0.74%
Administration % of Levy
2.45%
City's % of Levy
1.11%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$850,039.50
Levy % of Maximum Tax
89.97%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
$12,480,000
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
3.50%
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
2.23%
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
321
FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
321
Final Maturity 2054
iti Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
Rates increase 1% per year
CFD is fully developed
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.23-02 (PRADO -
MUNICIPAL SERVICES)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 23-02 (Prado - Municipal Services) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 2024-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 2024-06 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2024-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $81,494.14 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 24-06 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2024-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used in accordance with the Municipal Services listed on the attached Exhibit A.
The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 23-02 (Prado — Municipal Services)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been
collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
Jessica Alexander, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL TAXES, FACILITIES AND MUNICIPAL
SERVICES ELIGIBLE TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT
SPECIAL TAXES TO BE PREPAID
It is proposed that the District be eligible to finance all or a portion of any amount necessary to eliminate any fixed special assessment liens, or to pay, repay, or defease any obligation to pay or any indebtedness secured by any tax, fee, charge, or assessment levied within the area of the CFD (including, but not limited to the lien of special taxes by the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 01-2 (Harveston)), or to pay debt service on any such indebtedness.
FACILITIES
It is proposed that the District be eligible to finance all or a portion of the costs of the following facilities:
The acquisition and construction of: streets (including paving, aggregate base, striping and traffic marking, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways), including Temecula Center Drive, Ynez Road and Date Street within and in the vicinity of the District, stormwater drainage systems (including storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, junctions, manholes, catch basins and related dewatering), street light improvements (including light fixtures, substructures, conduits and service points of connection); and street signage (including traffic, stop and street name signs).
The foregoing are to include the acquisition of any related right-of-way and other land needed for the installation of any such improvements, demolition of existing structures and site leveling needed for the installation of any such improvements, erosion control, and other appurtenances.
• The acquisition and installation of traffic signal improvements, including traffic signal interconnection and video surveillance systems, at the intersection of Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive.
• Landscaping improvements in the public right of way along or in the vicinity of Temecula Center Drive, Date Street and Ynez Road, including related appurtenances. • Capital improvements included in the City of Temecula's adopted Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2024-2028.
• School improvements to be designated by the Temecula Valley Unified School District, which may include construction of buildings, equipping of school facilities, and acquisition of support and other appurtenances with a useful life of five years or more.
Sewer system improvements to be designated by the Eastern Municipal Water District Water facilities to be designated by the Rancho California Water District.
The Facilities include the acquisition of right-of-way, the costs of design, engineering and planning, the costs of any environmental or traffic studies, surveys or other reports, the cost of any required environmental mitigation and any required noise mitigation measures, landscaping A - 1
and irrigation, soils testing, permits, plan check and inspection fees, insurance, legal and related overhead costs, coordination and supervision and any other costs or appurtenances related to any of the foregoing.
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
It is proposed that the District be eligible to fund all or a portion of the costs of the following municipal services:
• Public safety services, including police and fire protection. • Maintenance of parks, and landscaping in public areas, public easements and public right of way in or near the area of the District, such maintenance to include but not be limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bioretention filters, multipurpose trails, and the furnishing of water for irrigation.
• Maintenance of public signage in or near the District. • Maintenance of storm drainage systems within or serving the area of the District, and including storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection.
• Maintenance of sidewalks, streets and roadways within or in the vicinity of the area of the District, and including slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street sweeping.
• Maintenance of street lighting located within or in the vicinity of the District, and including decorative lighting and pull box assemblies.
• Maintenance of traffic signals, and traffic interconnection and video surveillance systems, within and in the vicinity of the District, and including electrical, LED replacement, maintenance and replacement.
• Graffiti removal from public improvements within and in the area of the District.
The District may fund any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements, the furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy, for any lights or irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining equipment, apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus, facilities or fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary for such maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to provide the services, payment of insurance costs and other related expenses. The District may also provide for the reimbursement to the City of Temecula to the extent that the City of Temecula advances funds to pay for any of the foregoing services, and may fund reserves for repairs and replacements and for future expected costs of services. It is expected that the services will be provided by the City of Temecula, either with its own employees or by contract with third parties, or any combination thereof.
A - 2
The services to be financed by the District shall be in addition to those provided in the territory of the District before the date of creation of the District, and will not supplant services already available within that territory when the District is created.
OTHER
It is expected that the District may also finance any of the following:
1. Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, appraisal and price point study costs, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond and disclosure counsel fees and expenses, landowner counsel fees and expenses, and all other incidental expenses related to any special tax bonds (the "Bonds") issued for the District.
2. Administrative fees of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the Bond trustee or fiscal agent related to the District and the Bonds.
3. Reimbursement of costs related to the formation of the District advanced by the Authority, the City of Temecula, any landowner in the District, or any party related to any of the foregoing, as well as reimbursement of any costs advanced by the Authority, the City of Temecula, any landowner in the District or any party related to any of the foregoing, for facilities, fees or other purposes or costs of the District.
A - 3
City of Temecula
CFD 23-02 (Prado)
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Services CFD (No DSS)
Public Safety and Maintenance Services
2025-26 2026-27
itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Public Safety and Maintenance Services $0.00 $80,335.36 $80,335.36 Total Public Safety and Maintenance Services 1 $0.00 $80,335.36 $80,335.36 Administration
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollmentfe
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
City Administrative Costs
Other Costs
Total Administration
50.00 1 596.14 596.14
$0.00 $0.11 $19.14 $19.14
$0.00 $0.25 $43.50 $43.50
$0.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $1,158.78 $1,158.78
Other
2025-26 2026-27
Difference
$0.00
itern
Reserve Adjustment
Levy Levy
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
Delinquency Charges
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Total Other
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Totals
r2026-27
itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Total Requirement $0.00 $81,494.14 $81,494.14
District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Enrollment Adjustment
Total Levy $0.00 $81,494.14 $81,494.14
Factors:
Levy % Difference
N/A
Administration %of Levy
1.42%
City's % of Levy
1.23%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$81,494.14
Levy % of Maximum Tax
100.00%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
N/A
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
N/A
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
N/A
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
0 FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
174
Final Maturity
N/A
(t) Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
First Year Levy
Rates increase 5.6% per year
174 new permits for FY 2026-27
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.23-02 (PRADO -
FACILITIES)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 23-02 (Prado - Facilities) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act").
Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 2024-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD.
Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 2024-06 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2024-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $871,449.95 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County.
Section 5. The Special Tax as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 24-06 and Ordinance No. TPFA 2024-01 and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD.
Section 6. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth in the CFD Report, and used for the payment of administrative costs, eligible facilities, and incidental expenses of the CFD, and shall not be used for any other purpose.
Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 23-02 (Prado)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due.
Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code.
Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 28th day of July, 2026.
Jessica Alexander, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 28ffi day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
City of Temecula
CFD 23-02 (Prado)
2025 Special Tax Bonds
Budget Report
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Debt Service
r2026-27
Itern
Levy
Levy
Difference Note/Comment
March Interest Due
$296,088.89
$416,375.00
$120,286.11
September Interest Due
$416,375.00
$416,375.00
$0.00
September Principal Due
$0.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
Total Debt Service
$712,463.89
$852,750.00
$140,286.11
Administration
Itern
Trustee/Paying Agent
r2026-27
Rate Levy
$0.00
$0.00
Rate Levy
Difference
$2,500.00
Note/Comment
$2,500.00
Consultant Services
$7,411.49
$96.14
$7,411.49
Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) I
$0.00
$96.14
Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee)
$0.11
$0.00
$0.11
$26.07
$26.07
Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee)
$0.25
$0.00
$0.25
$59.25
$59.25
Delinquency Management
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
City Administrative Costs
$0.00
$8,457.00
$8,457.00
Administration Expenses
$0.00
$150.00
$150.00
Other Costs
Total Administration
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$18,699.95
$18,699.95
Other
Difference
$0.00
$0.00
Note/Comment
Itern
Reserve Adjustment
r2026-27
Levy
$0.00
Levy
$0.00
Delinquency Allowance
$0.00
$0.00
Delinquency Charges
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Less: Prior Year Surplus
Total Other
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Totals
r2026-27
Itern Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment
Total Requirement $712,463.89 $871,449.95 $158,986.06
District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Enrollment Adjustment
Actual Levy $712,463.89 $871,449.95 $158,986.06
Levy % Difference
N/A
Administration % of Levy
2.15%
City's % of Levy
0.97%
Maximum Authorized Tax
$991,319.84
Levy % of Maximum Tax
87.91%
Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2026
$16,655,000
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2025
N/A
FY 2025-26 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2026
N/A
FY 2025-26 Parcels Levied
0 FY 2026-27 Projected Parcels to Levy
237
Final Maturity 2056
iti Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 27, 2026.
Note/Comment
First Year Levy
Rates increase 2% per year
174 new permits for FY 2026-27
Item No. 17
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development
DATE: July 28, 2026
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution and Introduce an Ordinance Approving Planning Application Number LR26-0139 for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan
PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT ADDENDUM FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA
SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE
AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF
INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET, AND NORTH
OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (SCH NO. 2013061012)
2. Introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE AREA GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY
STREET AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD,
AND ADOPT AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN
TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH
#2013061012)
BACKGROUND: The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) encompasses approximately 560 acres and is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road/Murrieta Creek and south of Cherry Street. The UTSP includes six districts and two overlay areas, consisting of a mixed -use residential development, as well as property designated for conservation/open space (Murrieta Creek).
The City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan on November 17, 2015, and as part of the adoption, the Council also directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification and marketing plan for the newly adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. In June of 2017, Staff entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to prepare the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards (Sidewalk Standards). The development of the Sidewalk Standards involved two community workshops on July 17, 2017 and August 31, 2017, two meetings with Public Works, two meetings with the Planning Commission Sub Committee, and four meetings with the City Council Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee to obtain input and direction while developing the plan.
Staff and the development community have now been working with the Specific Plan and its Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards for a number of years. For this amendment, staff has identified various typographical edits and needed clarifications to improve the implementation of the Plan. Both the proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and the proposed Specific Plan amendments are further detailed in the following pages. None of the proposed amendments have an impact on the development fundamentals of the Plan.
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: Listed below are the proposed changes to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards organized by chapter.
Proposed Amendments to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards
1. Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for i. Presently there is ambiguity in the variety or subspecies of California Sycamore called for in the Specific Plan. The proposed ordinance would clarify and specify that only the Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a sycamore tree is called for.
b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
i. The intent of having alternating sidewalk color and texture has proved challenging in application due to the intermittent development pattern occurring in the Specific Plan area, causing inconsistencies in the new sidewalks effectively negating the reason for including the standard. The
proposed ordinance would remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines.
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
i. The Specific Plan requires new street trees to have a minimum of 40 square feet of root zone at a depth of 36 inches and provides for the use of Silva Cells when such an area is not possible. Silva Cells are a modular suspended pavement system that can provide additional root zone area. As development in the Specific Plan area increases, the use of such systems are proving infeasible due to the existing utilities in the right-of-way, the inconsistent development pattern, as well as the increased costs associated with such suspended pavement systems. This ordinance would remove the requirement to utilize Silva Cells and remove all references to such devices.
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for i. Presently, there is ambiguity in the variety or subspecies of California Sycamore called for in the Specific Plan. The proposed ordinance would clarify and specify that only the Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a sycamore tree is called for. The `Bloodgood' variety of the California Sycamore is a preferred variety due to its increased resistance to disease and its rapid canopy growth.
b. Section 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District - Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
i. The intent to have alternating sidewalk color and texture has proved challenging in application due to the intermittent development pattern occurring in the Specific Plan area, causing inconsistencies in the new sidewalks effectively negating the standards reason for inclusion. The proposed ordinance would remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Standards.
c. Section 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District - Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets
i. The Specific Plan requires new street trees to have a minimum of 40 square feet of root zone at a depth of 36 inches and provides for the use of Silva Cells when such an area is not possible. Silva Cells are a modular suspended pavement system that can provide for additional root zone area. As development in the Specific Plan area increases, the use of such systems are proving infeasible due to the existing utilities in the right-of-way, the inconsistent development pattern, as well as the increased costs associated with such suspended pavement systems. The proposed ordinance would
remove the product cut sheet for Silva Cells and all associated references to such systems.
d. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights i. The Specific Plan as adopted includes product cut sheets for 2 types of streetlights, for pedestrian (15-feet) and vehicular use (20-feet). As the Specific Plan builds out it has become evident that the heights of the streetlights are insufficient and allow for easy climbing and in turn potential injury or damage to public property. The proposed ordinance would remove and replace the cut sheets for both the pedestrian and vehicular streetlights with new cut sheets reflecting a 20-foot height for pedestrian lights and 25- foot height for vehicular lights. The design, color, finish and bulb type will remain unchanged.
Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Subsection 8 Appendices of Chapter B Plan Organization, add a reference to Appendix "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
i. This appendix was previously adopted by Ordinance No. 19-05 and only adds a reference to the existing document.
4. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
i. The proposed ordinance would add a note to the table that would clarify that all modifications to a development would be cumulative over the life of the project to prevent piecemealing of a project that would allow it to avoid the requirements within the Specific Plan.
Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix — Amend the use matrix to implement the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06)
i. Ordinance 2022-06 "Live Entertainment Ordinance" was passed by the City Council on April 12, 2022 and regulates live entertainment through the use of an annual live entertainment license. This proposed Ordinance would update the Land Use Matrix to include the requirements of Ordinance 2022- 06 within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area to clarify that the live entertainment ordinance also applies within the Specific Plan. b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of development to include 10% bicycle parking
i. As adopted, the Specific Plan does not require bicycle parking within its development standards. This ordinance would amend the development standards to include bicycle parking on the ground floor at a rate of 10% of required or provided vehicle parking spaces. The Temecula Municipal Code currently requires 5% bicycle parking for developments and staff believes
that the mixed -use nature, increased density and limited parking requirements of the Specific Plan area justifies the increase in bicycle parking.
c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Update the street cross sections i. As originally adopted, the street cross section standards contained assumptions about the currently in place infrastructure within the specific plan area and as development has occurred, these discrepancies have been a source of confusion for applicants and staff. The proposed amendment will replace all street cross sections with updated standards that consider current conditions and existing infrastructure. There is currently a total of 44 street cross sections that will be replaced with 23 new cross sections.
These updated cross sections are easier to understand and provide an improved graphical representation of each street segment. d. Subsection 3 Introducing New Blocks and Streets of Section G Block and Circulation Standards — include the requirement for a road alignment study for projects that require or propose to construct new roads for development i. This ordinance would add item "vii" which would require a road alignment study be submitted at the time of application to the Director of Public Works for approval. This would be a requirement of all development that requires or proposes new roads within Uptown.
e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
i. This ordinance would add "Subsection 4 New Street Naming Convention" to implement an orderly and understandable street naming convention that furthers the identity of the six (6) unique districts within the Specific Plan f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
i. Replace the term "Hypothetical" with "Proposed" as it relates to the street grid discussed throughout this document. This will eliminate confusion for developers who may look at the existing terminology surrounding street development and think it is a mere suggestion and not required to be followed, that is neither the case nor intent.
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Update exhibit name
i. The proposed ordinance would rename the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets," to clarify that the hypothetical street grid is the City's proposed street grid layout for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Update exhibit name
i. The proposed ordinance would rename the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" to clarify that the hypothetical street grid is the City's proposed street grid layout for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
i. Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table i. The proposed ordinance would remove the existing note for Table 3-14 and replace it with: "New development projects that propose or require new roads as part of their development shall submit, at the time of application,
to the Director of Public Works for approval, a road alignment study that either demonstrates conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Street Network or provides an alternative road alignment study which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or greater connectivity as Exhibit 3-14: Proposed Street Network." The new note would ensure that any proposed streets would be constructed to the standards contained within the Specific Plan and any deviation thereto would require written approval of the Director of Public Works. j. Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone i. Early, deliberate and pedestrian minded planning can make all the difference to a streetscape of a community coming into its identity as it develops and redevelops. The proposed ordinance would add language to require developers to coordinate early with utility providers and provide those coordination efforts in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Lack of planning on a developer's part shall not constitute a reason for blight within the Uptown Specific Plan area.
6. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types — Correct the graphics i. As presently adopted, Exhibit 4-11 "Allowable Frontage Types" contains an error, the proposed ordinance would modify the "Arcade" and "High Arcade" frontages to show the colonnade portion of the building aligning to the property line and the ground floor is aligned at the build -to line. b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
i. The proposed ordinance would replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade." The terms "Tall Arcade" and "High Arcade" are used interchangeably throughout this section and have the same meaning. This change would consolidate the terms into "High Arcade" for consistency and ease of use.
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — Correct the graphic titles i. The above exhibits reference "Tall Arcade" and will be corrected to "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the document.
7. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line.
i. As presently adopted, Exhibit 5-3 "Arcade Frontage" contains an error, the proposed ordinance would modify the exhibit to show the colonnade portion of the building aligning to the property line and the ground floor is aligned to the build -to line.
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, gas, electricity, and communication)
i. Add language to the Utility Guidelines section to state that no utility fixtures are permitted within the Utility Furnishing Zone without the written permission of the Director of Public Works and require early coordination with utility providers. In addition, would replace "should" with "shall" throughout Section E as it relates to utility consultations. c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines - Amend the language to clarify that streetlights with pedestrian lights shall be spaced at 120' interval and streetlights without pedestrian lights shall be spaced at a 60' interval or as determined by the Director of Public Works. i. As presently adopted, the spacing for streetlights is left to the discretion of the Director of Public Works. This proposed ordinance would specify the spacing of streetlights is sixty (60) feet or as determined by the Director of Public Works. This distance has proven effective for the ongoing development and shall be applied throughout the Specific Plan area.
8. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
i. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) without alcohol" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods and nonalcoholic beverages prepared, served, and consumed on the premises. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment.
ii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, and wine prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of any food prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involving dancing.
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
iii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine and distilled spirits" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, wine, and distilled spirits, prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine, and distilled spirit sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of any food prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involving dancing.
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
These amendments were heard by the Planning Commission at a regularly scheduled public meeting on May 6, 2026. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval. There were no public speakers.
ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Specific Plan amendment will not have a significant impact upon the environment based on a completed EIR Addendum. As a result, the City Council will take action on a recommendation to adopt an EIR Addendum in compliance with CEQA Section 15164.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Specific Plan Area Map
2. City Council Resolution — EIR Addendum
3. Exhibit A — EIR Addendum
4. City Council Ordinance — Specific Plan Amendment
5. Exhibit A — Specific Plan Amendment (Underline/Strikeout)
6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2026-05
7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2026-06
8. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 6, 2026
9. Notice of Public Hearing
10. Draft Notice of Determination with County Clerk
Mufrieta Creek
Recreation and
Opcn Spite DisCriC
UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
RESOLUTION NO.2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM FOR THE UPTOWN
TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA
STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
STANDARDS AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET,
AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (SCH NO.
2013061012)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The project site is approximately 560 acres and encompasses the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
E. The City prepared an EIR Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR Addendum and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter.
G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2026-05 recommending that the City Council adopt the EIR Addendum for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2026-06 thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a Specific Plan Amendment.
H. Prior to taking action at the noticed City Council public hearing held on July 28, 2026, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information to support a fair argument requiring additional environmental review under CEQA because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified.
Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.
B. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
C. The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the EIR Addendum, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony.
D. The City Council has reviewed the EIR Addendum and all comments received regarding the Final MND prior to and at the July 28, 2026 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment following imposition of the mitigation that has been proposed and is included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and (3) the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.
E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the EIR Addendum, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
F. The City Council hereby directs staff to file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21152(a).
N
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 28th day of July, 2026.
Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 28th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
ADDENDUM NO.1 TO UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2013061012)
Prepared by the City of Temecula
In its capacity as a Lead Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (LR26-0139) PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Temecula
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Long Range Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Uptown Temecula Street Scape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards.
BACKGROUND: The Uptown Specific Plan and related Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were originally adopted on November 17, 2015. The specific plan was adopted by Ordinance No. 15-13 and the EIR was adopted by Resolution No. 15-065. The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards were recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission on March 20, 2019 by Planning Commission Resolution 19-12. The City Council adopted the document on May 14, 2019 by Ordinance No. 19-05.
Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Add Appendices "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
2. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix —Amend the use matrix to implement the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06) and add a reference for alcoholic beverage sales to follow Chapter 17.10 Alcohol of the Temecula Municipal Code
b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of development to include 10% bicycle parking
c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Update the street cross sections d. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Add Subsection vii to include the requirement for a road alignment study for projects that require or propose to construct new roads for development
e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" and correct any reference throughout the section
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" and correct any reference throughout the section
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table referring to the road alignment study required for new roads and any deviation would require the written approval of the Director of Public Works
Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone
4. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types — Modify the graphics to show the correct building placement for Arcade and High Arcade frontage types b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — replace "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency
5. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, gas, electricity, and communication)
c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines — Amend the language to state that street lights shall be spaced at a 60' interval or as determined by the Director of Public Works
6. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
Proposed Amendments to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets d. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights PURPOSE: This addendum to the Environmental Impact Report is being prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 which allows for a lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously adopted Environmental Impact Report. Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) provides that an addendum to an adopted Environmental Impact Report may be prepared if only C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D815841 B\@BCL@D815841 B.docx
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report have occurred.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for the project unless, on a basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following is determined:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the previous Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance identifies one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report.
FINDINGS CONCERNING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the environmental impacts of the original project were studied in an EIR that was certified in 2015 (SCH 2O13061012). In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan that has been previously outlined does not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated and no further environmental review is necessary. Updates to the Specific Plan include: the addition of Appendices G (Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards); the addition of various clarification footnotes throughout the document; the addition of references discussing the existing live entertainment ordinance and alcoholic beverage sales requirements contained in the Temecula Municipal Code; the addition of a 10% bicycle parking requirement for all districts; an update of the existing street cross sections; the addition of road alignment study requirements including the need for written approval of the Public Works Director; implementation of a new naming convention for streets; revising the term "hypothetical Street Grid" to "Proposed Street Grid" throughout the document; revise an exhibit title from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" throughout the document; ; the addition of language stating that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade; modify various incorrect graphics to show correct building placement; revise the term "Tall Arcade" to "High Arcade" also revise related exhibits; include language requiring applicants to begin early consultation with utility providers; include clarifying language regarding street light placement; and revise the definition of restaurant.
Updates to the Street Scape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards include: specifying the type of sycamore to be used in the specific plan area; removal of a concrete type; removal of reference to Silvia Cells for tree roots; and revision of product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and street lights.
None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary. This is because the amendments as described above consist of graphic corrections, revisions of terms, inclusion of additional footnotes, removal of sidewalk materials and general clarifications throughout the document. These revisions do not constitute substantial changes that will require major revisions of the previous EIR C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D815841 B\@BCL@DB15841 B.docx
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
due to the involvement of new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there are not substantial changes that occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Finally, there is no new information of substantial importance that identified one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
M
Title:
Date:
C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D815841 B\@BCL@DB15841 B.docx
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN SPECIFIC
PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE
AREA GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE
15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET AND NORTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND ADOPT AN
ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN TEMECULA
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2013061012)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application (the "Project") was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
D. In November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted the Uptown Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012).
E. The City prepared an EIR Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the EIR Addendum, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. 2026-05 and 2026-06, recommending that the City Council approve LR26-0139, and the EIR Addendum.
H. On July 28, 2026, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR Addendum, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony, and any comments received regarding the Project and EIR Addendum prior to and at the public hearing.
I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Environment Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139:
A. Some changes or additions to the EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a Subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the amendments to the Specific Plan that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the amendments to the Specific Plan are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previously certified EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the amendments to the Specific Plan will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 3. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the hereby makes the following findings regarding the Specific Plan Amendment:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. Goal I Policy 1.5 requires the preparation of specific plans to achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure. The proposed Specific N
Plan Amendment achieves this goal in that the amendments will strengthen the Uptown Specific Plan by providing clarifications and revisions designed to further achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure in the specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City s General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the amendments mainly consist of clarification items to ensure consistency in how standards are applied and interpreted.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.
The Specific Plan amendment will not require any physical modifications in order to be implemented. All appropriate infrastructure is already in place. Several of the proposed amendments are designed to allow the specific plan to be more consistent with the existing infrastructure. Other proposed amendments will provide clarifications to elements of the plan that will enhance usability of the document.
D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Many of the proposed amendments are designed to ensure consistency with the existing built environment. In addition, other proposed amendments are designed to provide clarifications that will enhance the usability of the specific plan. Overall, the amendments will help ensure the development of a desirable character that will be compatible with future proposed development in the specific plan area.
Section 4. Specific Plan Amendment. The City Council hereby amends the Uptown Specific Plan to read as provided in Exhibit "A", attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as set forth in full. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the certified Uptown Temecula EIR (SCH #2013061012).
Section 5. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, 3 provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
Section 7. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 28th day of July, 2026.
Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2026- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 281h day of July, 2026, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Exhibit A Specific Plan Amendments
Proposed Amendments to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards
1. Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Section 4.1.1 Recommended Plan List by District — Remove the Fern Pine and replace it with...
c. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
d. Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets e. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan
3. Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Subsection 8 Appendices of Chapter B Plan Organization, add a reference to Appendix "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
8. Appendices
The appendices include the following reference documents:
A. Glossary of Terms
B. General Plan Consistency
C. Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment
D. New Streets In -Lieu Fee
E. Landscape Plant List
F. Conceptual Case Studies
G. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards
4. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
Table 1: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan - Phased Compliance Matrix Scope of Development Proposal
Corresponding Planning
Specific Plan Compliance
Application Type
Required
Any project that proposes the adaptive
Adaptive Reuse Application
Adaptive Reuse Standards
reuse of an existing building.
A proposed change or modification to the
Sign Permit
Architectural Design Guidelines
exterior of an existing building without the
Sign Program
addition of new square footage. ' 2
Minor Modification
Major Modification
Building additions totaling 10% or less of
Minor Modification
Relative to the new addition
only:
the existing square footage on a project
Major Modification
site in existence prior to the adoption of
. Architectural Design
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plana
Guidelines
• Si na a Standards
Building additions greater than 10% and
Major Modification
Relative to the new addition
only:
up to 50% of the existing square footage
on a project site in existence prior to the
. Architectural Design
adoption of the Uptown Temecula
Guidelines
Specific Plana
. Signage Standards
Building Type Standards
Frontage Type Standards
• Building Placement
Standards
• Maximum Building Height
Standards
• Parking Placement
Standards
• Minimum Parking Space
Requirements
Building additions greater than 50% of
Major Modification
All specific plan requirements
the existing square footage on a project
apply (including land uses)
site in existence prior to the adoption of
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, or
proposed additions which exceed 50% of
the current market value of the existing
structure (s) on a project site (as
determined by an appraisal certification)
New development proposals
Development Plan
All specific plan requirements
apply (including land uses
'Examples include: paint color changes, patio additions, addition of awnings, material changes, relocation of window and door, etc.
'All additions and/or modifications shall be cumulative over the protects life to prohibit piecemeal changes to development.
Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix —Amend the use matrix to implement the provisions of the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06)
List of Uses
UHT
UA
WH-RO
CV
CV -CO MCR-
OS
Alcoholic beverages sales
7Seenicipal Code ce tion 17 4n Supplemental leme ., tal Development to ,� ads Chapter 17.10 Alcohol
Residential care facilities
-
C
-
-
seven to twelve 2
Residential care facilities for
-
-
P
-
-
the elder) six or fewer)2
Residential care facilities for
-
-
C
-
the elderly (seven to twelve) 2
Residential-live/work
-
-
P
P
-
P
-
-
Restaurant (bona fide eating
P
P
P
P
-
P
P
-
establishment) without the
sale of alcohol
Restaurant (bona fide eating
P
P
P
P
-
P
P
-
establishment) with the sale of
beer and wine'
Restaurant (bona fide eating
C
C
C
C
-
C
C
-
establishment) with the sale of
beer, wine, and distilled
s ip rits7
Restaurant (bona fide public
P
P
P
P
-
P
P
-
eating establishment) with
entertainment (not includinq
—
—
dancin
Restaurant (bona fide public
P
P
P
P
-
P
P
-
eating establishment) with
entertainment and/or dancing�
FOOTNOTES:
'Subject to the Standards for Specific Uses outlined in Section 3.C. 2 Subject to the State of California Department of Social Services licensing requirements. 3 Full -service hotels (see definition in appendix) of up to 8 stories in height are permitted by right in the Uptown Hotel/Tourism District.
4 Office uses are permitted above the first floor only. However, office uses may be permitted on the first floor when the office use does not directly front onto any street included any future street. 5 Residential uses are permitted above the first floor only. 6 All new development on a vacant parcel or redevelopment of a parcel within an Overlay area shall conform to the allowable uses of the Overlay as specified. Additionally, until such time that a parcel within an Overlay area is redeveloped by adding more than 50% of the existing square footage on the project site, or by proposed addition which exceeds 50% of the current market value of the existing structure(s) on site, (as specified in Table 2-2 of the UTSP), land uses within a legal non -conforming building may be those uses that are allowed within the underlying District, as specified in Table 3-1.
Subject to the supplemental Development Standards in Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 17.10 9.10 and 9.11
b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of all development to include 10% bicycle parking
Table -2: Parking Requirements - All Districts
Land Use
Required Parking Space Ratio
Residential
1.75 spaces per dwelling unit
Retail/Service Commercial'°2
2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
Offices
2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
1.0 space per guest room or suite (ancillary conference rooms, Hotels
meeting rooms and ballrooms within the hotel shall be parked separately at 2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
Daycare, nursery schools
1 space per 2 employees, plus 1 space per 5 children, based on facility capacity
Elementary and junior high
1.5 spaces per classroom, plus 1 space per 5 fixed seats in school (Kindergarten through
auditorium, gymnasium or similar public assembly facility (35 SF = 5 eighth grade) z
fixed seats)
High school (ninth through
$spaces per classroom
twelfth grade)
College or university2
1 space per employee, plus 4 spaces per 10 students based on maximum classroom capacity
Trade or vocational schools
2 spaces per 3 people based on maximum number of students and staff, or 1 space per 35 SF of instruction GFA
Religious Institutions
1 space per 3 fixed seats and 1 space per 35 SF of assembly (where there are no fixed seats) (without daycare or school uses) May require a parking analysis for certain uses where assembly or large number of customers are anticipated.
2 Bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 10% of vehicle spaces, with a minimum of ten 00) spaces c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Replace the existing street cross sections with the following:
BUECKING DR
EX. R.O.W. 78'
EX. ROADWAY=59
R.O.W
R.i W
SNY LS pRNE LANE CENTER
TURN pRNE LANE PARALLEL LS Syy
LANE PARKING!
BNLBDUT BU LDOUT
CALLE CORTEZ
EX. R62'.4.W= 62'
EX. ROADWAY: 48'
R.O.W R.O.W
8 5 11.ORNE LANE 11 pRNE LRNE 5' 8 5.5• 8.5'
PARKING! BIKE BIKE PARICINC LW SW
RAISE❑ LANE LgNE RAISED
uULDOLIT euLRour
COMMERCE CENTER
EX_ R_O W- 66'
EX_ ROADWAY- 44'
R.O.W
DEL RIO RD
EX. R.O.W: 76'
EX_ ROADWAY- 48'
I II
e.
SW LS
e' e•
PARKING! BIKE IIIVE LANE 111E�LANE PARKINo1 LS
RAISED LANE —NE RAISED
DULDouT
II I
SW
ENTERPRISE N & S
EX. R.O.W: 7B'
EX. ROADWAY: 56'
R.O.W R.O.W
4' 5' e' 4'
SNY LS ANGLED PARKING URNE LANE oRNE LANE PARALLEL
PARKNG
ENTERPRISE CIRCLE W
EX. R.OZ 66'
EX. ROADWAY: 44'
R.O.W
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW. 100'
EX. ROADWAY_ 76'
W RTI
ROW
1R�
e
u NE FEa
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROADWAY: 76
R.O.W
MEDIAN -I
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW I 112'
EX. ROADWAY: W
n
� � I �r�■�.rd■ror �rir■i �� I
sw TERN oarvE LnNE CRIVELlNE ryRN 4ANE *URN LuiE y DR-E oRrvEvnE tAwE 5W S.cGi- G- t,,tar—t—
R.6.W
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROADWAY: 7T
0' 12'
RIGHT —
nRNLANE 7URN�NE TURN ANE
EX. ROADWAY: 76'
R.O.W
I
II III II II I
4'
DRIVE LANE D_ LS sW
FER LANE
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW: 100'
EX. ROADWAY: 76
m
SW L pRNE LANE DRIVE LANE LEFT R pR1VE LANE DRIVE LONE BIKE LS SW S TURNLANE MRNIANE Ri LANE
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW: 1 DO'
EX. ROADWAY. 76'
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW MY
EX ROADWAY_ 76
a l w n
a i w
�II II -II
III III II II II
sw
E
R IN—
DIl-E NE R DR— E
�NE
oR.LLANE Ea uNE
sw
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW iDQ
EX. ROADWAY: 75'
R .
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROADWAr SE
R.o.w R.o.w
IN
RIGNTTDRN DRNELANE ❑RIVELANE LEFT LERT R DRI_EL DRIVEL E N; DIKE LONE TURN LANE _N-E M LANE
LAS HACEINDAS ST
EX. R_OOW=7V
EX_ ROADWAY: 48'
f
I
sw I PAR iK 11• DRIVE LANE K sw
oRNE LANE
RAISED LANE LANE BULB G
MADISON AVE
EX R.O.W. 1 OD'
EX ROADWAY: 7U
Row
' es R.I w
II I IIII
& 14' 8 8
SW l5 ANGLED PARKING! DRNELANE CENTER TURN D—E—E ANGLED PARKING! LS SW —SED BUM— —E RASED DULDOUT
MADISON AVE
EX. R.O.W: 78'
EX_ ROADWAY: 56'
ROW ROW
r
SW LS PARALLEL DRIVE LANE CENTER TURN pRNELANE PARPI-I-EL LS SW
PARKING LANE PARKING
McCABE CT
EX. ROADWAY: 56'
R.G.W R.O.W
1 I
I II II
GW LS ANGLED PARKING DRNE LANE DRNELANE PARALLEL LS sW
PARWNG
RIDER WAY
EK R_O.W: 66'
EX- ROADWAY: 44'
R.Id_W R.O.W
rk
4 �• 7'
sw �s DRIVE L-aNE DRIVE Lr.raE Ls sw
SANBORN AVE
Ex. ROW : 100'
EX. ROADWAY: 76'
R.Iw
R_ w
SW LS ANGLEDPARMNGI pRtVE LANE CENTER IURN DRIVE LANE ANGLED PARHINGI LS SW RAISED DN LANE RAISED 6pLDOUT
VIA MONTEZUMA
Ex_ R.0 W= 76'
EX. ROADWAY: 48'
R.o.w
i'
SW LS B IL•OI1T BIKE pRNE LANE ❑RNE LANE DKE = 1DNGf LS SW E.
d. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Add Subsection vii vii. All development or redevelopment proiects that propose or reauire for development any new street or roadway within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area shall submit, at the time of application, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, a road alignment study which shall:
• Demonstrate alignment conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Future Streets; or • Propose an alternative alignment, which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or greater connectivity than Exhibit 3-13:
Proposed Future Streets, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
4. New Street Naming Convention
Identity and neighborhood character is a recurring theme and a goal of the community in the creation of this specific plan (Recommendation No. 3) and a well -planned street naming convention will enhance the unique character of the 6 distinct districts in this specific plan. Any new street constructed within this specific plan area shall be named accordingly:
i. All new streets that have primarily an East — West direction of travel shall continue the numbered street names originating in Old Town, starting with "7th Street", the Southernmost East — West street proposed, and increasing in number by 1 (one) each East — West street constructed north of the proposed "7th Street." ii. All new streets that have primarily a North — South direction of travel shall select a name for the street that relates to the district from which the new street originates. The name shall be of significant importance to the district from which it originates, such as, but not limited to:
• The name of a community leader, artist, musician or a person of historical significance
• The name of plants or animals shall be limited to those native to the local area • Other names of significance, as approved by the Community Development Director
iii. When a street traverses through multiple districts within this specific plan area, the development project that first constructed or caused the construction of the road shall propose the name based on its district location within the specific plan and the naming convention in this section
v. All new streets, regardless of district or direction, shall submit, in writing, the proposed street name to the Director of Community Development for approval. It shall be the Community Development Director's sole discretion to approve and/or amend proposed street names within this specific plan area.
f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
5. Block Standards
In order to facilitate the urban development patterns and intensification of land uses that are envisioned for this specific plan, smaller blocks and additional streets are required. The following block standards work in conjunction with existing streets and the proposedhypethetieal street grid desired for the specific plan area. For the purposes of implementing this section:
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" and correct any reference throughout the section
Exhibit 3-13 illustrates the proposed hyperr�cthcCica development of a street grid in future Uptown Jefferson.
The sketch on the left illustrates the existing street grid, and the sketch on the right illustrates proposed pia) future streets (dashed lines) that could be added to the existing network. The result is a network of smaller blocks which are more walkable and pedestrian -scaled.
Existing street grid in Uptown Jefferson Proposed P^ eRtial future streets (dashed lines) creating smaller blocks in Uptown Jefferson
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" and correct any reference throughout the section Exhibit 1: Proposed H• ^, ,tea.' Development of New Streets
I
AI
Exhibit -2: Proposed H�•^, Via.' Street Network
i. Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table referring to the road alignment study required for new roads and any deviation would require the written approval of the Director of Public Works
Table-3: Block Standards
District Name
Maximum Block
Length (any side)
Maximum Perimeter
Uptown Center (UC)
600 ft.
2,100 ft.
Urban Hotel/Tourist (UHT)
600 ft.
2,100 ft.
Transit/Sports District (US)
600 ft.
2,100 ft.
Urban Arts District (UA)
450 ft.
1,500 ft.
Creekside Village (CV)
450 ft.
1,500 ft.
New development projects that propose or require new roads as part of their development shall submit, at the time of application, to the Director of Public Works for approval, a road alignment study that either demonstrates conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Street Network or provides an alternative road alignment study which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or greater connectivity as Exhibit 3-14: Proposed Street Network.
N8W deVe'GpMeRt pr(�er__ts; Shall athempt to follow the GenGeptual street neb.vark shown An the Hypothet'Gal 2trppt NiPbAfArk as Plesely as possible (Exhibit 3 14). if not feasiblia to tin so, as may be in some GaSeS, the developer must provide reasonable justifir_-..;;tin_.n Ghevving diffiGUIty in fGllewing the GonGeptual street grid RetWG* and shall alse prepese aR alternative street layeut that fellews the BIGGk Size Guidelines. The alternative layout shall achieve a similar level of connectivity as the Hypothetical Block and Street Network.
J. Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add item V and VI containing language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone
v. No utilitv fixtures are to be located within the utilitv furnishing zone without the written authorization of the Director of Public Works.
vi. Early coordination with utility providers is necessary for a satisfactory placement of required utility furnishings, lack of coordination on part of the applicant or developer shall not cause blight on the streetscape within this specific plan area. Written evidence of earlv consultation efforts will be reauired at time of submittal to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
6. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types —Modify the graphics to show the correct building placement for Arcade and High Arcade frontage types
oie
��' b�
b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
3. Hijzh T,+9 Arcade Frontage Type
The High Tall Arcade frontage type is a facade that is similar to the Arcade frontage type, except the High T44 Arcade's colonnade is taller than one story. Like the Arcade frontage type, the High T414 Arcade's colonnade is also covered by upper stories. The ground floor fagade is aligned at the build -to line and the upper stories extend out to the property line but do not encroach into the public right-of-way. The build -to line is shown as the solid red line in the following sketches. The High T444 Arcade frontage type is ideal for retail when the adjacent sidewalk is fully accessible from the colonnade so that pedestrians can easily access the retail uses.
The walkway located under the High TaR Arcade shall be at the same grade as the sidewalk in order to allow for pedestrian access and flow between the public right- of-way and the area covered by the High Ta44 Arcade.
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — replace "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency
hq
Exhibit-4: High TA Arcade Isometric View
Exhibit -3: High T-a4 Arcade Site Plan View
Exhibit-5: High Tai4 Arcade Cross Section View
7. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line.
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, electricity, and gas)
ix. Early consultation with Rancho California Water District shall shoul occur in order to ensure that equipment is placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact. Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time of annlication.
iii. Early coordination with Southern California Edison shall shetil occur in order to ensure that transformers are placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact, and to ensure that transformers are well screened and in
compliance with utility provider's standards. Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time of application.
V. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate screening methods shall shoul occur early in the project design process. Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time of application.
c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines — As presently adopted, the spacing for streetlights is left to the discretion of the Director of Public Works. This proposed ordinance would specify the spacing of streetlights is sixty (60) feet or as determined by the Director of Public Works. This distance has proven effective for the ongoing development and shall be applied throughout the Specific Plan area b) Street Lighting
i. New streetlights shall be placed at sixty (60) foot intervals or as determined by the Director of Public Works.
ii. Lighting shall comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance
8. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
i. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) without alcohol" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods and nonalcoholic beverages prepared, served, and consumed on the premises. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment.
ii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, and wine prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of any food prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of
operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involvingdancing,
ancing,
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
iii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine and distilled spirits" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, wine, and distilled spirits, prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine, and distilled spirit sales, an establishment shall meet the following_ requirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of an.. f�prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involving dancing.
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
PC RESOLUTION NO.2026-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT AN
EIR ADDENDUM FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA
SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET
SCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED W WEST OF
INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET, AND
NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The project site is approximately 560 acres and encompasses the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area.
C. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
E. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 6, 2026, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the EIR Addendum and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that:
A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.
B. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
C. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and which includes the EIR Addendum, staff reports and presentations and all oral and written testimony.
D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR Addendum and all comments and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR Addendum was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the EIR Addendum reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.
E. The Planning Commission, in the exercise of its independent judgment, recommends that the City Council adopt the EIR Addendum for the Project as described in the attached Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6th day of May, 2026.
TOM
ATTEST:
.. Huy- RL
Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2026-05 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of May 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Matics, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watson NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
Matt Peters
Secretary
Exhibit A - City Council Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT AN EIR ADDENDUM FOR
THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN AND
UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET SCAPE AND SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AMENDMENT
GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15,
SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET, AND NORTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The project site is approximately 560 acres and encompasses the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
E. The City prepared an EIR Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR Addendum and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter.
G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2026-_ recommending that the City Council adopt the EIR Addendum for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2026- thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a Specific Plan Amendment.
H. Prior to taking action at the noticed City Council public hearing held on , 2026, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information to support a fair argument requiring additional environmental review under CEQA because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified.
Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.
B. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
C. The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the EIR Addendum, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony.
D. The City Council has reviewed the EIR Addendum and all comments received regarding the Final MND prior to and at the , 2026 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment following imposition of the mitigation that has been proposed and is included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and (3) the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.
E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the EIR Addendum, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
F. The City Council hereby directs staff to file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21152(a).
2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 6th day of May,
Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Exhibit B - Uptown Addendum EIR
ADDENDUM NO.1 TO UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2013061012)
Prepared by the City of Temecula
In its capacity as a Lead Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment #1 (LR26-0139) PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Temecula
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Long Range Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Uptown Temecula Street Scape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards.
BACKGROUND: The Uptown Specific Plan and related Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were originally adopted on November 17, 2015. The specific plan was adopted by Ordinance No. 15-13 and the EIR was adopted by Resolution No. 15-065. The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards were recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission on March 20, 2019 by Planning Commission Resolution 19-12. The City Council adopted the document on May 14, 2019 by Ordinance No. 19-05.
Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan
1. Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Add Appendices "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
2. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
3. Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix — Amend the use matrix to implement the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06) and add a reference for alcoholic beverage sales to follow Chapter 17.10 Alcohol of the Temecula Municipal Code
b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of development to include 10% bicycle parking
c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Update the street cross sections d. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Add Subsection vii to include the requirement for a road alignment study for projects that require or propose to construct new roads for development
e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" and correct any reference throughout the section
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" and correct any reference throughout the section
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table referring to the road alignment study required for new roads and any deviation would require the written approval of the Director of Public Works
Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone
4. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types — Modify the graphics to show the correct building placement for Arcade and High Arcade frontage types b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — replace "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency
5. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, gas, electricity, and communication)
c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines — Amend the language to state that street lights shall be spaced at a 60' interval or as determined by the Director of Public Works
6. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
Proposed Amendments to the Streetsca a and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia 'Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b.
c. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
d. Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets e. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights PURPOSE: This addendum to the Environmental Impact Report is being prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 which allows for a lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously adopted Environmental Impact Report. Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) provides that an addendum to an adopted Environmental Impact Report may be prepared if only R:\1AGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2026\05062026\LR26-0139 Uptown specific Plan Amendment (EJ)\1.2 Uptown Addendum EIR DOCX
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report have occurred.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for the project unless, on a basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following is determined:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the previous Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance identifies one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report.
FINDINGS CONCERNING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the environmental impacts of the original project were studied in an EIR that was certified in 2015 (SCH 2O13061012). In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan that has been previously outlined does not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated and no further environmental review is necessary. Updates to the Specific Plan include: the addition of Appendices G (Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards); the addition of various clarification footnotes throughout the document; the addition of references discussing the existing live entertainment ordinance and alcoholic beverage sales requirements contained in the Temecula Municipal Code; the addition of a 10% bicycle parking requirement for all districts; an update of the existing street cross sections; the addition of road alignment study requirements including the need for written approval of the Public Works Director; implementation of a new naming convention for streets; revising the term "hypothetical Street Grid" to "Proposed Street Grid" throughout the document; revise an exhibit title from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" throughout the document; ; the addition of language stating that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade; modify various incorrect graphics to show correct building placement; revise the term "Tall Arcade" to "High Arcade" also revise related exhibits; include language requiring applicants to begin early consultation with utility providers; include clarifying language regarding street light placement; and revise the definition of restaurant.
Updates to the Street Scape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards include: specifying the type of sycamore to be used in the specific plan area; removal of a concrete type; removal of reference to Silvia Cells for tree roots; and revision of product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and street lights. .
None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary. This is because the amendments as described above consist of graphic corrections, revisions of terms, inclusion of additional footnotes, removal of sidewalk materials and general clarifications throughout the document. These revisions do not constitute substantial changes that will require major revisions of the previous EIR RMAGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2026\05062026\LR26-0139 Uptown specific Plan Amendment (EJ)\1.2 Uptown Addendum EIR.DOCX
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
due to the involvement of new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there are not substantial changes that occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Finally, there is no new information of substantial importance that identified one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
M
Title:
Date:
R:\1AGENDA MANAGE R\Planning Commission Items\2026\05062026\LR26-0139 Uptown specific Plan Amendment (EJ)\1.2 Uptown Addendum EIR.DOCX
PC RESOLUTION NO.2026-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA
SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET
SCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
FOR THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF
INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET AND
NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND ADOPT
AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN
TEMECULA EIR (SCH #2013061012)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application (the "Project") was processed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The project site is approximately 560 acres and encompasses the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
E. In November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted the Uptown Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012).
F. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
G. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on May 6, 2026, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139:
A. Some changes or additions to the EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a Subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the amendments to the Specific Plan that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the amendments to the Specific Plan are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previously certified EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the amendments to the Specific Plan will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 3. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139, hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. Goal 1 Policy 1.5 requires the preparation of specific plans to achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment achieves this goal in that the amendments will strengthen the Uptown Specific Plan by providing clarifications and revisions designed to further achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure in the specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060
(amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the amendments mainly consist of clarification items to ensure consistency in how standards are applied and interpreted..
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.
The Specific Plan amendment will not require any physical modifications in order to be implemented. All appropriate infrastructure is already in place. Several of the proposed amendments are designed to allow the specific plan to be more consistent with the existing infrastructure. Other proposed amendments will provide clarifications to elements of the plan that will enhance usability of the document.
D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Many of the proposed amendments are designed to ensure consistency with the existing built environment. In addition, other proposed amendments are designed to provide clarifications that will enhance the usability of the specific plan. Overall, the amendments will help ensure the development of a desirable character that will be compatible with future proposed development in the specific plan area.
Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN
TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN STREET SCAPE AND SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED ON WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD, AND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN TEMECULA EIR (SCH #2013061012)". The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan in substantially the same form as attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A", and adopt the Addendum to the EIR attached to this Resolution as Exhibit `B".
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6 h day of May 2026.
iiI I
►� /.� t 1��' 1r..�
ATTEST:
H&�L=
Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2026-06 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of May 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Matics, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watson NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
t4a;wpo
Matt Peters
Secretary
ORDINANCE NO.2026-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN SPECIFIC
PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET SCAPE AND
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE
AREA GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE
15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET AND NORTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND ADOPT AN
ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN TEMECULA
EIR (SCH #2013061012)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application (the "Project") was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
D. In November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted the Uptown Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012).
E. The City prepared an EIR Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the EIR Addendum, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution Nos. 2026- , recommending that the City Council approve LR26-0139, and the EIR Addendum.
H. On , 2026, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR Addendum, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony, and any comments received regarding the Project and EIR Addendum prior to and at the public hearing.
I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Environment Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139:
A. Some changes or additions to the EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a Subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the amendments to the Specific Plan that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the amendments to the Specific Plan are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previously certified EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the amendments to the Specific Plan will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 3. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the hereby makes the following findings regarding the Specific Plan Amendment:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. Goal 1 Policy 1.5 requires the preparation of specific plans to achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment achieves this goal in that the amendments will strengthen the Uptown Specific Plan by providing clarifications and revisions designed to further achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure in the specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the amendments mainly consist of clarification items to ensure consistency in how standards are applied and interpreted.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.
The Specific Plan amendment will not require any physical modifications in order to be implemented. All appropriate infrastructure is already in place. Several of the proposed amendments are designed to allow the specific plan to be more consistent with the existing infrastructure. Other proposed amendments will provide clarifications to elements of the plan that will enhance usability of the document.
D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Many of the proposed amendments are designed to ensure consistency with the existing built environment. In addition, other proposed amendments are designed to provide clarifications that will enhance the usability of the specific plan. Overall, the amendments will help ensure the development of a desirable character that will be compatible with future proposed development in the specific plan area.
Section 4. Specific Plan Amendment. The City Council hereby amends the Uptown Specific Plan to read as provided in Exhibit "A", attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as set forth in full. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the certified Uptown Temecula EIR (SCH #2013061012).
Section 5. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
Section 7. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of ,
Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2026- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , , and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Exhibit B - Specific Plan Amendment
Proposed Amendments to thestreetscape and Sidewalk lmprovemew Standards Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Section 4.1.1 Recommended Plan List by District — Remove the Fern Pine and replace it with...
c. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
d. Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets e. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights Pro osed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Subsection 8 Appendices of Chapter B Plan Organization, add a reference to Appendix "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
8. Appendices
The appendices include the following reference documents:
A. Glossary of Terms
B. General Plan Consistency
C. Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment
D. New Streets In -Lieu Fee
E. Landscape Plant List
F. Conceptual Case Studies
G. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards
4. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealin of projects
Table 1: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan - Phased Compliance Matrix Scope of Development Proposal Corresponding Planning Specific Plan Compliance Apmlication Tvne Reauired
Any project that proposes the adaptive Adaptive Reuse Application 1 Adaptive Reuse Standards reuse of an existing building.
A proposed change or modification to the
exterior of an existing building without the
addition of new square footage. ' 2
Building additions totaling 10% or less of
the existing square footage on a project
site in existence prior to the adoption of
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
Sign Permit
Sign Program
Minor Modification
Maior Modification
Minor Modification
Major Modification
Building additions greater than 10% and Major Modification up to 50% of the existing square footage
on a project site in existence prior to the
adoption of the Uptown Temecula
Specific Plan.
Building additions greater than 50% of 1 Major Modification the existing square footage on a project
site in existence prior to the adoption of
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, or
proposed additions which exceed 50% of
the current market value of the existing
structure (s) on a project site (as
determined by an appraisal certification)
Architectural Design Guidelines
Relative to the new addition
only:
• Architectural Design
Guidelines
Standards
Relative to the new addition
only:
• Architectural Design
Guidelines
• Signage Standards
• Building Type Standards
• Frontage Type Standards
• Building Placement
Standards
• Maximum Building Height
Standards
• Parking Placement
Standards
• Minimum Parking Space
_ Requirements
All specific plan requirements
apply (including land uses)
New development proposals Development Plan All specific plan requirements apply (including land uses)_
'Examples include: paint color changes, patio additions, addition of awnings, material changes, relocation of window and door, etc.
ZAII additions and/or modifications shall be cumulative over the oroiects life to nrnhihit nieremeal channel to dBVPInnmPnt
5. Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix —Amend the use matrix to implement the provisions of the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06)
List of Uses
Alcoholic beverages sales
0E UHT � UA 1 t WRO I CV I CV -CO �
See Municipal Code ceGtion 17 10 . 1__F qnt i n„uBlE3p+�79r+��taA S Chapter 17.10 Alcohol
tesidential care facilities -
C
seven to twelve) 2
Residential care facilities for
-
P
r
the elderly Csix or fewer)z
C
Residential care facilities for
the elderly (seven to twelve) 2
Residential-live/work
-
-
P
P
-
P
-
-
Restaurant {bona fide eating
P
P
P
P
-
P
P
_
establishment) without the
sale of alcohol
Restaurant_Lbona fide eating
P
P
P
—
P
—
P
P
—
establishment) with the sale of
beer and wine?
Restaurant (bona fide eating
C
C
C
C
-
C
C
establishment) with the sale of
Beer, wine, and distilled
spirits'
P
P
Restaurant (bona fide public
P
P
P
P
eating establishment) with
entertainment (not including
r
—
—
-
—
—
dancing)'
Restaurant (bona fide public
eating establishment) with P P P P P_ P
entertainment and/or danci0p7
FOOTNOTES:
'Subject to the Standards for Specific Uses outlined in Section 3.C. 2 Subject to the State of California Department of Social Services licensing requirements. 3 Full -service hotels (see definition in appendix) of up to 8 stories in height are permitted by right in the Uptown Hotel/Tourism District.
4 Office uses are permitted above the first floor only. However, office uses may be permitted on the first floor when the office use does not directly front onto any street included any future street. 5 Residential uses are permitted above the first floor only- 6 All new development on a vacant parcel or redevelopment of a parcel within an Overlay area shall conform to the allowable uses of the Overlay as specified. Additionally, until such time that a parcel within an Overlay area is redeveloped by adding more than 50% of the existing square footage on the project site, or by proposed addition which exceeds 50% of the current market value of the existing structure(s) on site, (as specified in Table 2-2 of the UTSP), land uses within a legal non -conforming building may be those uses that are allowed within the underlying District, as specified in Table 3-1.
' Subject to the supplemental Development Standards in Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 17 10. 9 10 and 9 11 b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of all development to include 10% bicycle parking
Land Use
Residential?
Retail/Service Commercial'?
Table -2: Parking Requirements - All Districts
Required Parking Space Ratio
1.75 spaces per dwelling unit
2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
Office2 1 2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
Hotel
Daycare, nursery school
Elementary and junior high
school (Kindergarten through
eighth grade)z
High school (ninth through
twelfth grade) z
College or university
Trade or vocational school
1.0 space per guest room or suite (ancillary conference rooms, meeting rooms and ballrooms within the hotel shall be parked separately at 2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA) _
1 space per 2 employees, plus 1 space per 5 children, based on facility capacity
1.5 spaces per classroom, plus 1 space per 5 fixed seats in auditorium, gymnasium or similar public assembly facility (35 SF = 5 fixed seats)
1 8 spaces per classroom
1 space per employee, plus 4 spaces per 10 students based on maximum classroom capacity
2 spaces per 3 people based on maximum number of students and staff, or 1 space per 35 SF of instruction GFA
Religious Institutions 11 space per 3 fixed seats and 1 space per 35 SF of assembly (where there are no fixed seats) (without daycare or school uses) ' May require a parking analysis for certain uses where assembly or large number of customers are anticipated.
2 Bicvcle parking shall be Drovided at a rate of 10% of vehicle spaces, with a minimum of ten (10) spaces c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards —Replace the existing street cross sections with the following:
BUCKING DR
EX. R.O W; 73
EX ROADWAY_ 56
Raw ,
6 S R 1T U R 3' C
SW LS FkALLCL � OMNt 4NIs CENfQi ]UFN pANE WE PAiL{LL6L LS SlY P/1RION6! I LANE PAf3LN61
9IAHOtli , 6188dJT
CALLE CORTEZ
Ex_R.O_W_ST
EX. ROADWAY: 41r
0 Al
p�4W g�wF I1.ORNE LINE 11.ORNE LANE S PAR [Y SS
RNSED LANE Ig./IiPIE RAL�D Lila
6LO.60UT BULBOIIT
COMMERCE CENTER
EX R_O.W: W
EX ROADWAY: 44'
now
I i
T ® r
'iw �..i n.wn�N-v DNNE LwnE oFervE WEE vAVRNfP.• Le S1N RA»FC I C.4aCD
SULYCXlT
DEL RIO RD
EX R.O_W: 76,
EX. ROADWAY: Mr
How
fti
a a a e• .�•
it r
=
SW 8 PFIL(WGI BBtE ORNE LANE
RAISED U!g
OfSNEIAlB: dl�•C
11d1!
vFill4M0'
TF[�D
BULBOUT
6lfcCMl'
ENTERPRISE N & S
EX R.O_W: 78
EX ROADWAY: W
FLOW
Ito.w
I �
T �• 1B• I9 M B T
9W L8 ANGLED PARM N6 RRNPI/A! OflNE�AI£ PARfOiA LS SfY
ENTERPRISE CIRCLE W
EX ROWW
EX ROADWAY: 44'
n.a.w R o.w
OL
{ I
r � ��r It• s � r
3W L$ PARNNO/ DRA/E L/1NE ORI1�LAe1E PAfpCW(Y LS >311V
RAISED RA18FD
[I I)LD�]U! 9UL6q�T
JEFFERSON AVE
EX RD.W: tar
EX ROADWAY: 76
al .W
sW �s � P.Px�Po � oPr,EwrE n-a.E urn au,Ea nw,
JEFFERSON AVE
IX ROW 1W
EX. ROADWAY 76
** RI..
.arE oPrvE urn +aa �
u�E
Row
AM
�. o�rE z a E SP BUGP D{Nr IA,L ORNc ulff ]RNE W1E -
r wce
JEFFERSON AVE
EX PLOW 112'
EX ROAMAY W
P i.w a .r
f I f n
.AM :
EX ROADWAY. 77'
P o.w
PAW
't A
_u w �PoVe L.VP; - � Y n..r..VN �.i+x �RrvEVwE GPNE UNE vN.v yYlf 3n
sec°"�almtw `tom JEFFERSON AVE
EX R.O.W. I
EX ROADWAY: 76
RO.W RO.N
n
isms�
sw Ls ea[E e+s- ars LAHl oarrc uK cEN+E.nNr+ owve uxE oNrvEL.wE BUF- aME Ls sv urn ra L,wE cEa u�
JEFFERSON AVE
EX RO.w: 10(P
EX ROADWAY_ 76
aow
i.w
r
a t +v n e
OW as ORM1E IAIE OWNE L,vtE IEFT Pr/�C W+C OwNC54+L B� +i .?1 ' Tll+eI VHE n1E+IMlE 4 +ANE
JEFFERSON AVE
EX R.O.W. 1W
EX ROADWAY: 76
wilmmiamom
+r , +r
SM +1 6�¢ OaL'ElA+iF OLYEUIRa ST+R® lFF'r pVY£WE OiWE+AIE WONT �,g Sw +N+E � RobiluNR EM+L[m
JEFFERSON AVE
EX RO.W. iw
EX ROADWAY: 76
0.0.w
A
e e +r
SA L9 E� .F- OIaIE LN+E OCUVEU+1tE mAEienro+ ORI'R lx+� OPoVE VNE awe L9 !w iNE FEA LA+S iHl IAIE
Row
7. e
Svl L3 eYF uLvc I.11-E DINS LIUI[
TARE �
JEFFERSON AVE
EX ROW IW
EX- ROADWAY: 7E _
war
f
9 MQEO �yELµE o-.rvELwE u sn
N64+JI •�' VNE _
JEFFERSON AVE
EX ROADWAY: W
avow
I f
I �► � �� � � .ram _r: _�
n- Ir 11. Iv Iw r f1. v a
RIGHT TLS81 DItNE3ANE OJVE LANE LEPf cR R ORNE LONE u9NELA� a� �!'E lAlIE IL--E -1. LANE N 1T1�
LAS HACEINDAS ST
EX. Ro.w 78'
X-
EROADWAY: 46'
ROM
f y
� 9 11.11 • 1�
3W riP MUI B�(E WtlJE LNIE ORNE LANE 6ME �kY 9VY
RMCD LANE EwNE f �^.,m
BULBG1rT HLReoIfF
MADISON AVE
EK RO. W_ lw
EY ROADWAY: 7E
rtcw R.o-N
f y
sv L, oavEwlE o�+T�T� oRrvElaE w•_. �rARlwx+ u a
RAL� auaaH uRE RAm�unea�r
MADISON AVE
EX R.O.W: 7&
IX ROADWAY-5&
wow R.aW
■
sw � � nRivs w.t cexrEn naR oanrE �wRE pi u Lq sw
McCABE CT
IX. PLO-W. 7V
EX ROADWAY_ W
R O_W
ROW
SW I.S wY fu f;f] rA �lN u�!i ORNEIARE DANEIANE P.e.�• y. �Y
RIDER WAY
EX. R.O.W: 6@
EX ROADWAY- 44'
w.o.w
l
rtow
E
,
f a• �+• �f e �•
r
311Y
LS P/1RIONQJ ORRIE LA#lE ORn/E YAlIE PARKWC! l8
RA13ED RAt6E0
9UI.BOl1T BIRHOUT
SW
SANBORN AVE
DC RO.W 7W
DC ROADWAY'7C
Row
I
RO.W
!
f
ra
♦ rze w as e
tc a.o.co r.+ror.n nndE urg cor mm ,uuwmv�o■fsr is
RY9FD BUleOIR ux= a�a�Bart
e
a.
VIA MONTEZUMA
IX ROW 76'
IX. ROADWAY_ 41Y
paw n aw
I � i
w i �• e e �r ,r r e � w
�/'� L9 P/1RKWiL B•lE pWVE LMIE pRNE LMiE BY'.2 PAWONb L4 9YY iWSED t/VE lIWF MlSEO
BU19QR 6UlBQ1T
d. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Add Subsection vii vii. All development or redevelopment proiects that proaose or reauire for development any new street or roadway within the Uptown Ternecula Specific Plan area shall submit, at the time of apalication, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, a road alignment study which shall:
• Dernonstr•ate alignment conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Future Streets, or Propose an alternative alignment, which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or greater connectivity than Exhibit 3-13:
Proposed Ft1tUre Streets. to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
4. New Street Naming Convention
Identity and neighborhood character is a recurring theme and a goal of the comi-nunit in the creation of this specific plan (,Recommendation No. 3) and a well -planned street naming convention will enhance the unique character of the 6 distinct districts in this specific plan. Any new street constructed within this specific plan area shall be named accordingly: -
i. All new streets that have primarily an East — West direction of travel shall continue the numbered street names originating in Old Town, starting with "7th Street", the Southernmost East — West street proposed, -and increasing in number by I (one) for each East — West street constructed north of the proposed "7th Street" ii. All new streets that have primarily a North -- South direction of travel shall select a name for the street that relates to the district from which the new street originates. The name shall be of significant importance to the district from which it originates, such as, but not limited to:
• The name of a community leader, artist, musician or a person of historical si gn i 1 i cance
• The name of plants or animals shall be limited to those native to the local area • Other names of significance, as approved by the Community Development Director
I►I. Wh411 a street tlavcrscs throe 2h r- 111.iltihle districts within this specific plan MVc L, the development project that first constructed or caused the construction of the road shall rooT the name based on its district location within the s eci[ic plan and the namin T convention in this section
v. All new streets. regardless of district or direction, shall submit. in writing. the proposed street name to the Director ofContimunit Develo )niellt l'or approval. It shall be the Corn III Lill rt' Development Director's sole discretion to al2prove and/or amend proposed street names within this specific plan area.
Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
5. Block Standards
In order to facilitate the urban development patterns and intensification of land uses that are envisioned for this specific plan, smaller blocks and additional streets are required. The following block standards work in conjunction with existing streets and the proposed hypethefiral street grid desired for the specific plan area. For the purposes of implementing this section:
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" and correct any reference throughout the section
Exhibit 3-13 illustrates the - - - - - - -' hypethetisa' development of a street grid in future Uptown Jefferson.
The sketch on the left illustrates the existing street grid, and the sketch on the right illustrates ;, . i.� potential future streets (dashed lines) that could be added to the existing network. The result is a network of smaller blocks which are more walkable and pedestrian -scaled.
I
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" and correct any reference throughout the section Z
Exhibit -2: Proposed Wypethetical Street Network
i. Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table referring to the road alignment study required for new roads and any deviation would require the written approval of the Director of Public Works
Table-3: Block Standards
District Name Maximum Block Maximum Perimeter
Length (any side
Uptown Center (UC) 600 ft. 2,100 ft.
Urban Hotel/Tourist (UHT) 600 ft. 2,100 ft.
Transit/Sports District (US) 600 ft. 2,100 ft.
Urban Arts District (UA) 450 ft. 1,500 ft.
Creekside Village (CV) 450 ft. 1,500 ft.
New development projects that propose or require new roads as oart of their development shall submit. at the time of application, to the Director of Public Works for approval, a roar) alignment study that either demonstrates conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Street Network or provides an alternative road alignment study which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or greater connectivity as Exhibit 3-14: Proposed Street Network.
Street Netwo
ce rame the d
street grid
orr��
Guideline�T
RtrARt hiet?1 a
j. Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add item V and VI containing language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone
v. No utility fixtures are to be located within the utility furnishing zone without the written authorization of the Director of Public Works.
vi. Earlyc:aordination with utility_ providers is necessary for a satisfactoiyplacement ofre uired utifily furnishin s. lack orcoordination on pall of the applicant urdevel❑ er shall not cause b_ light an the streetscape within this specific plan area. Written evidence of early consultation efforts will be required at time of submittal to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
6. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types — Modify the graphics to show the correct building placement for Arcade and High Arcade frontage types
ta I�
b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
3. High T444 Arcade Frontage Type
The H_Hiah Tall Arcade frontage type is a fagade that is similar to the Arcade frontage type, except the High Taff Arcade's colonnade is taller than one story. Like the Arcade frontage type, the High T444 Arcade's colonnade is also covered by upper stories. The ground floor fagade is aligned at the build -to line and the upper stories extend out to the property line but do not encroach into the public right-of-way. The build -to line is shown as the solid red line in the following sketches. The Hl gli Tal Arcade frontage type is ideal for retail when the adjacent sidewalk is fully accessible from the colonnade so that pedestrians can easily access the retail uses.
The walkway located under the High Tall Arcade shall be at the same grade as the sidewalk in order to allow for pedestrian access and flow between the public right- of-way and the area covered by the l-i iglu Tall Arcade. c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — replace "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency
Exhibit-4: ftb Tag Arcade Isometric View
Exhibit -3: Hieh Fall Arcade Site Plan View
A
E
Exhibit-5: High Fall Arcade Cross Section View
7. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line.
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, electricity, and gas)
ix. Early consultation with Rancho California Water District shall should occur in order to ensure that equipment is placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact. Stich et1orts shall be presented in writi ng to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time of applicalion.
iii. Early coordination with Southern California Edison shall should occur in order to ensure that transformers are placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact, and to ensure that transformers are well screened and in
compliance with utility provider's standards.._ Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction ofthe Director of Public Works at the time ofapplication.
V. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate screening methods shall should occur early in the project design process. Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time ofapplication.
c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines — As presently adopted, the spacing for streetlights is left to the discretion of the Director of Public Works. This proposed ordinance would specify the spacing of streetlights is sixty (60) feet or as determined by the Director of Public Works. This distance has proven effective for the ongoing development and shall be applied throughout the Specific Plan area b) Street Lighting
i. New streetlights shall be placed at sixty (60) foot intervals or as determined by the Director of Public Works.
ii. Lighting shall comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
i. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) without alcohol" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation. service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods and nonalcoholic beverages prepared. served and consumed on the premises. U-.ntertainirrent establishinents that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment.
iL "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales" means anX establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods nonalcoholic beverages. beer-, and wine prepared. served. and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eatina establishment with beer and wine sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
1. Be designed and Operated in_Such _away that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the oritnary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of any food prepared For consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public I'or business and en a red in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages. restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of
Qperation. Restaurant service sltalI include, but not be limited to, an offering and the abilit to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involving dancing.
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
iii. "Restaurant bona fide public eating establishment with beer. wine and distilled spirits" means agy establishment where the primary business is the preparation. service and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of Foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, wine, and distilled spirits, re ared served and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment with beer, wine. and distilled spirit sales, an establishment shall meet the C011OWillP, re uirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beveraes is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The Sale of any food prepared for consunption off the premises shall be occasional only and cle rly ancillary and subordinate to the on- remises restaurant o ration.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the pubiic for business and engaged in the ancillary sale ofalcoholic beverages. restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts. and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involving; dancing,
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishntent pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula MulliC1 al Code.
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development
DATE OF MEETING: May 6, 2026
PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner
PROJECT Long Range Planning Project Number LR26-0139, Amending the SUMMARY: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan as detailed in Ordinance "2026-_" attached here as Exhibit A.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Uptown Temecula Specific Plan amendments and the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards.
CEQA: Pursuant to State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012).
None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) encompasses approximately 560 acres and is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road/Murrieta Creek and south of Cherry Street. The UTSP includes six districts and two overlay areas, consisting of a mixed -use residential development, as well as property designated for conservation/open space (Murrieta Creek).
The City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan on November 17, 2015, and as part of the adoption, the Council also directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification and marketing plan for the newly adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. In June of 2017, Staff entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to prepare the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards (Sidewalk Standards). The development of the Sidewalk Standards involved two community workshops on July 17, 2017 and August 31, 2017, two meetings with Public Works, two meetings with the Planning Commission Sub Committee, and four meetings with the City Council Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee to obtain input and direction while developing the plan.
Staff and the development community have now been working with the Specific Plan and its Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards for a number of years. Staff has identified various typographical edits and needed clarifications to improve the implementation of the Plan.
Both the proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and the proposed Specific
Plan amendments are further detailed in the following pages. None of the proposed amendments impact the development fundamentals of the Plan.
Listed below is a summary of the proposed changes to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards organized by chapter. Each is discussed in greater detail in the analysis section of this report:
Proposed Amendments to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets d. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights with increased height
Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan
3. Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Add Appendices "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards" and "H — Uptown Temecula Street Parking"
4. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
5. Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix — Amend the use matrix to implement the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06) and add a reference for alcoholic beverage sales to follow Chapter 17.10 Alcohol of the Temecula Municipal Code b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of development to include 10% bicycle parking
c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Update the street cross sections d. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Add Subsection vii to include the requirement for a road alignment study for projects that require or propose to construct new roads for development
e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" and correct any reference throughout the section
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" and correct any reference throughout the section i. Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table referring to the road alignment study required for new roads and any deviation would require the written approval of the Director of Public Works
j. Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone
6. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types — Modify the graphics to show the correct building placement for Arcade and High Arcade frontage types b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — replace "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency
7. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, gas, electricity, and communication) c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines — Amend the language to state that street lights shall be spaced at a 60' interval or as determined by the Director of Public Works
8. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
ANALYSIS
Outlined below is the explanation for the proposed amendments:
Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for i. Presently there is ambiguity in the variety or subspecies of California Sycamore called for in the Specific Plan. The proposed ordinance would
clarify and specify that only the Platanus x acerifolia Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a sycamore tree is called for.
b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
i. The intent to have alternating sidewalk color and texture has proved challenging in application due to the intermittent development pattern occurring in the Specific Plan area, causing inconsistencies in the new sidewalks effectively negating the reason for including the standard. The proposed ordinance would remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines.
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
i. The Specific Plan requires new street trees to have a minimum of 40 square feet of root zone at a depth of 36 inches and provides for the use of Silva Cells when such an area is not possible. Silva Cells are a modular suspended pavement system that can provide for additional root zone area. As development in the Specific Plan area increases, the use of such systems are proving infeasible due to the existing utilities in the right-of-way, the inconsistent development pattern, as well as the increased costs associated with such suspended pavement systems. This ordinance would remove the requirement to utilize Silva Cells and remove all references to such devices.
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for i. Presently, there is ambiguity in the variety or subspecies of California Sycamore called for in the Specific Plan. The proposed ordinance would clarify and specify that only the Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a sycamore tree is called for. The `Bloodgood' variety of the California Sycamore is a preferred variety due to its increased resistance to disease and its rapid canopy growth.
b. Section 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District - Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
i. The intent to have alternating sidewalk color and texture has proved challenging in application due to the intermittent development pattern occurring in the Specific Plan area, causing inconsistencies in the new sidewalks effectively negating the standards reason for inclusion. The proposed ordinance would remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Standards.
c. Section 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District - Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets
5 i. The Specific Plan requires new street trees to have a minimum of 40 square feet of root zone at a depth of 36 inches and provides for the use of Silva Cells when such an area is not possible. Silva Cells are a modular suspended pavement system that can provide for additional root zone area. As development in the Specific Plan area increases, the use of such systems are proving infeasible due to the existing utilities in the right-of-way, the inconsistent development pattern, as well as the increased costs associated with such suspended pavement systems. The proposed ordinance would remove the product cut sheet for Silva Cells and all associated references to such systems.
d. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights i. The Specific Plan as adopted includes product cut sheets for 2 types of streetlights, for pedestrian (15-feet) and vehicular use (20-feet). As the Specific Plan builds out it has become evident that the heights of the streetlights are insufficient and allow for easy climbing and in turn potential injury or damage to public property. The proposed ordinance would remove and replace the cut sheets for both the pedestrian and vehicular streetlights with new cut sheets reflecting a 20-foot height for pedestrian lights and 25- foot height for vehicular lights. The design, color, finish and bulb type will remain unchanged.
Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan
3. Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Subsection 8 Appendices of Chapter B Plan Organization, add a reference to Appendix "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
i. This appendix was previously adopted by Ordinance No. 19-05 and only adds a reference to the existing document.
4. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
The proposed ordinance would add a note to the table that would clarify that all modifications to a development would be cumulative over the life of the project to prevent piecemealing of a project to avoid the requirements within the Specific Plan.
5. Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix — Amend the use matrix to implement the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06)
i. Ordinance 2022-06 "Live Entertainment Ordinance" was passed by the City Council on April 12, 2022 and regulates live entertainment through the use of an annual live entertainment license. This proposed Ordinance would update the Land Use Matrix to include the requirements of Ordinance 2022- 06 within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area to clarify that the live entertainment ordinance also applies within the Specific Plan.
b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of development to include 10% bicycle parking
i. As adopted, the Specific Plan does not require bicycle parking within its development standards. This ordinance would amend the development standards to include bicycle parking on the ground floor at a rate of 10% of required or provided vehicle parking spaces. The Temecula Municipal Code currently requires 5% bicycle parking for developments and staff believes that the mixed -use nature, increased density and limited parking requirements of the Specific Plan area justifies the increase in bicycle parking.
c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Update the street cross sections i. As originally adopted, the street cross section standards contained assumptions about the currently in place infrastructure within the specific plan area and as development has occurred, these discrepancies have been a source of confusion for applicants and staff. The proposed amendment will replace all street cross sections with updated standards that consider current conditions and existing infrastructure. There is currently a total of 44 street cross sections that will be replaced with 23 new cross sections.
These updated cross sections are easier to understand.
d. Subsection 3 Introducing New Blocks and Streets of Section G Block and Circulation Standards — include the requirement for a road alignment study for projects that require or propose to construct new roads for development i. This ordinance would add item "vii" which would require a road alignment study be submitted at the time of application to the Director of Public Works for approval. This would be a requirement of all development that requires or proposes new roads within Uptown.
e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
i. This ordinance would add "Subsection 4 New Street Naming Convention" to implement an orderly and understandable street naming convention that furthers the identity of the six (6) unique districts within the Specific Plan f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
i. Replace the term "Hypothetical" with "Proposed" as it relates to the street grid discussed throughout this document. This will eliminate confusion for developers who may look at the existing terminology surrounding street development and think it is a mere suggestion and not required to be followed, that is neither the case nor intent.
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Update exhibit name
i. The proposed ordinance would rename the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets," to clarify that the hypothetical street grid is the City's proposed street grid layout for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
7 h. Exhibit 3-14 — Update exhibit name
i. The proposed ordinance would rename the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" to clarify that the hypothetical street grid is the City's proposed street grid layout for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
i. Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table i. The proposed ordinance would remove the existing note for Table 3-14 and replace it with: "New development projects that propose or require new roads as part of their development shall submit, at the time of application, to the Director of Public Works for approval, a road alignment study that either demonstrates conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Street Network or provides an alternative road alignment study which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or greater connectivity as Exhibit 3-14: Proposed Street Network." The new note would ensure that any proposed streets would be constructed to the standards contained within the Specific Plan and any deviation thereto would require written approval of the Director of Public Works. j. Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone i. Early, deliberate and pedestrian minded planning can make all the difference to a streetscape of a community coming into its identity as it develops and redevelops. The proposed ordinance would add language to require developers to coordinate early with utility providers and provide those coordination efforts in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Lack of planning on a developer's part shall not constitute a reason for blight within the Uptown Specific Plan area.
6. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types —Correct the graphics i. As presently adopted, Exhibit 4-11 "Allowable Frontage Types" contains an error, the proposed ordinance would modify the "Arcade" and "High Arcade" frontages to show the colonnade portion of the building aligning to the property line and the ground floor is aligned at the build -to line. b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
i. The proposed ordinance would replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade." The terms "Tall Arcade" and "High Arcade" are used interchangeably throughout this section and have the same meaning. This change would consolidate the terms into "High Arcade" for consistency and ease of use.
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — Correct the graphic titles i. The above exhibits reference "Tall Arcade" and will be corrected to "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the document.
8 7. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line.
i. As presently adopted, Exhibit 5-3 "Arcade Frontage" contains an error, the proposed ordinance would modify the exhibit to show the colonnade portion of the building aligning to the property line and the ground floor is aligned to the build -to line.
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, gas, electricity, and communication) i. Add language to the Utility Guidelines section to state that no utility fixtures are permitted within the Utility Furnishing Zone without the written permission of the Director of Public Works and require early coordination with utility providers. In addition, would replace "should" with "shall" throughout Section E as it relates to utility consultations. c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines - Amend the language to clarify that streetlights with pedestrian lights shall be spaced at 120' interval and streetlights without pedestrian lights shall be spaced at a 60' interval or as determined by the Director of Public Works. i. As presently adopted, the spacing for streetlights is left to the discretion of the Director of Public Works. This proposed ordinance would specify the spacing of streetlights is sixty (60) feet or as determined by the Director of Public Works. This distance has proven effective for the ongoing development and shall be applied throughout the Specific Plan area.
8. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
b. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
i. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) without alcohol" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods and nonalcoholic beverages prepared, served, and consumed on the premises. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment.
ii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, and wine prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation. 6 2. The sale of any food prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involving dancing.
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
iii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine and distilled spirits" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, wine, and distilled spirits, prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine, and distilled spirit sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
I. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of any food prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involving dancing.
10 6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on April 23, 2026.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required. A Negative Declaration will be filed with the County Clerk of the Board.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. PC Resolution with Addendum to EIR
Exhibit A — City Council Resolution EIR Addendum
Exhibit B — Uptown Addendum EIR
2. PC Resolution with Ordinance
Exhibit A — City Council Ordinance Adopting Addendum to EIR Exhibit B — Specific Plan Amendment
3 Notice of Public Hearing
4. Draft Notice of Determination
m
PC RESOLUTION NO.2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT AN
EIR ADDENDUM FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA
SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET
SCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
AMENDMENT GENERALLY LOCATED W WEST OF
INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET, AND
NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The project site is approximately 560 acres and encompasses the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area.
C. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
E. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on May 6, 2026, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the EIR Addendum and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that:
A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.
B. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
C. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and which includes the EIR Addendum, staff reports and presentations and all oral and written testimony.
D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR Addendum and all comments and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR Addendum was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the EIR Addendum reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.
E. The Planning Commission, in the exercise of its independent judgment, recommends that the City Council adopt the EIR Addendum for the Project as described in the attached Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6t' day of May, 2026.
Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chair
ATTEST:
Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 61h day of May 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
Matt Peters
Secretary
Exhibit A - City Council Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT AN EIR ADDENDUM FOR
THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN AND
UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET SCAPE AND SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AMENDMENT
GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15,
SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET, AND NORTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The project site is approximately 560 acres and encompasses the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
E. The City prepared an EIR Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR Addendum and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter.
G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2026-_ recommending that the City Council adopt the EIR Addendum for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2026- thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a Specific Plan Amendment.
H. Prior to taking action at the noticed City Council public hearing held on , 2026, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information to support a fair argument requiring additional environmental review under CEQA because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified.
Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full.
B. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
C. The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the EIR Addendum, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony.
D. The City Council has reviewed the EIR Addendum and all comments received regarding the Final MND prior to and at the , 2026 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment following imposition of the mitigation that has been proposed and is included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and (3) the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.
E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the EIR Addendum, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
F. The City Council hereby directs staff to file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21152(a).
a
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 6th day of May,
Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
3 Exhibit B - Uptown Addendum EIR
ADDENDUM NO.1 TO UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2013061012)
Prepared by the City of Temecula
In its capacity as a Lead Agency
PROJECT TITLE: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment #1 (LR26-0139) PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Temecula
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Long Range Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Uptown Temecula Street Scape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards.
BACKGROUND: The Uptown Specific Plan and related Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were originally adopted on November 17, 2015. The specific plan was adopted by Ordinance No. 15-13 and the EIR was adopted by Resolution No. 15-065. The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards were recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission on March 20, 2019 by Planning Commission Resolution 19-12. The City Council adopted the document on May 14, 2019 by Ordinance No. 19-05.
Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Add Appendices "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
2. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
3. Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix — Amend the use matrix to implement the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06) and add a reference for alcoholic beverage sales to follow Chapter 17.10 Alcohol of the Temecula Municipal Code
b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of development to include 10% bicycle parking
c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Update the street cross sections d. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Add Subsection vii to include the requirement for a road alignment study for projects that require or propose to construct new roads for development
e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" and correct any reference throughout the section
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" and correct any reference throughout the section
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table referring to the road alignment study required for new roads and any deviation would require the written approval of the Director of Public Works
Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone
4. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types — Modify the graphics to show the correct building placement for Arcade and High Arcade frontage types b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — replace "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency
5. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, gas, electricity, and communication)
c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines — Amend the language to state that street lights shall be spaced at a 60' interval or as determined by the Director of Public Works
6. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
Proposed Amendments to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia `Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b.
c. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
d. Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets e. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights PURPOSE: This addendum to the Environmental Impact Report is being prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 which allows for a lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously adopted Environmental Impact Report. Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) provides that an addendum to an adopted Environmental Impact Report may be prepared if only R:\1AGENDA MANAGE R\Planning Commission Items\2026\05062026\LR26-0139 Uptown specific Plan Amendment (EJ)\1.2 Uptown Addendum EIR.DOCX
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report have occurred.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for the project unless, on a basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following is determined:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the previous Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance identifies one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report.
FINDINGS CONCERNING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the environmental impacts of the original project were studied in an EIR that was certified in 2015 (SCH 2O13061012). In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan that has been previously outlined does not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated and no further environmental review is necessary. Updates to the Specific Plan include: the addition of Appendices G (Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards); the addition of various clarification footnotes throughout the document; the addition of references discussing the existing live entertainment ordinance and alcoholic beverage sales requirements contained in the Temecula Municipal Code; the addition of a 10% bicycle parking requirement for all districts; an update of the existing street cross sections; the addition of road alignment study requirements including the need for written approval of the Public Works Director; implementation of a new naming convention for streets; revising the term "hypothetical Street Grid" to "Proposed Street Grid" throughout the document; revise an exhibit title from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" throughout the document; ; the addition of language stating that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade; modify various incorrect graphics to show correct building placement; revise the term "Tall Arcade" to "High Arcade" also revise related exhibits; include language requiring applicants to begin early consultation with utility providers; include clarifying language regarding street light placement; and revise the definition of restaurant.
Updates to the Street Scape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards include: specifying the type of sycamore to be used in the specific plan area; removal of a concrete type; removal of reference to Silvia Cells for tree roots; and revision of product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and street lights.
None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary. This is because the amendments as described above consist of graphic corrections, revisions of terms, inclusion of additional footnotes, removal of sidewalk materials and general clarifications throughout the document. These revisions do not constitute substantial changes that will require major revisions of the previous EIR RMAGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2026\05062026\LR26-0139 Uptown specific Plan Amendment (EJ)\1.2 Uptown Addendum EIR.DOCX
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (LR26-0139) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study
due to the involvement of new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, there are not substantial changes that occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Finally, there is no new information of substantial importance that identified one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
Title:
Date:
RMAGENDA MANAGER\Planning Commission Items\2026\05062026\LR26-0139 Uptown specific Plan Amendment (EJ)\1.2 Uptown Addendum EIR.DOCX
PC RESOLUTION NO.2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA
SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET
SCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
FOR THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF
INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET AND
NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND ADOPT
AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN
TEMECULA EIR (SCH #2013061012)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application (the "Project") was processed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The project site is approximately 560 acres and encompasses the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
E. In November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted the Uptown Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012).
F. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
G. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on May 6, 2026, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139:
A. Some changes or additions to the EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a Subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the amendments to the Specific Plan that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the amendments to the Specific Plan are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previously certified EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the amendments to the Specific Plan will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 3. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139, hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. Goal 1 Policy 1.5 requires the preparation of specific plans to achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment achieves this goal in that the amendments will strengthen the Uptown Specific Plan by providing clarifications and revisions designed to further achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure in the specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060
(amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City s General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the amendments mainly consist of clarification items to ensure consistency in how standards are applied and interpreted..
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.
The Specific Plan amendment will not require any physical modifications in order to be implemented. All appropriate infrastructure is already in place. Several of the proposed amendments are designed to allow the specific plan to be more consistent with the existing infrastructure. Other proposed amendments will provide clarifications to elements of the plan that will enhance usability of the document.
D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Many of the proposed amendments are designed to ensure consistency with the existing built environment. In addition, other proposed amendments are designed to provide clarifications that will enhance the usability of the specific plan. Overall, the amendments will help ensure the development of a desirable character that will be compatible with future proposed development in the specific plan area.
Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN
TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN AND UPTOWN STREET SCAPE AND SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED ON WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD, AND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN TEMECULA EIR (SCH #2013061012)". The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan in substantially the same form as attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A", and adopt the Addendum to the EIR attached to this Resolution as Exhibit `B".
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6th day of May 2026.
Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chair
ATTEST:
Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2026- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of May 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Matt Peters
Secretary
ORDINANCE NO.2026-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN SPECIFIC
PLAN AND UPTOWN TEMECULA STREET SCAPE AND
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE
AREA GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE
15, SOUTH OF CHERRY STREET AND NORTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND ADOPT AN
ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED UPTOWN TEMECULA
EIR (SCH #2013061012)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, a Specific Plan Amendment Application (the "Project") was filed by the City in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA").
C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 14000, et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the Project.
D. In November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted the Uptown Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012).
E. The City prepared an EIR Addendum for the project in accordance with CEQA Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
F. On May 6, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the EIR Addendum, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution Nos. 2026- , recommending that the City Council approve LR26-0139, and the EIR Addendum.
H. On , 2026, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR Addendum, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony, and any comments received regarding the Project and EIR Addendum prior to and at the public hearing.
I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Environment Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Specific Plan Amendment Application No. LR26-0139:
A. Some changes or additions to the EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a Subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the amendments to the Specific Plan that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the amendments to the Specific Plan are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previously certified EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the amendments to the Specific Plan will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 3. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the hereby makes the following findings regarding the Specific Plan Amendment:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
a
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. Goal 1 Policy 1.5 requires the preparation of specific plans to achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment achieves this goal in that the amendments will strengthen the Uptown Specific Plan by providing clarifications and revisions designed to further achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure in the specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies, and objectives.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The amendment won't be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the amendments mainly consist of clarification items to ensure consistency in how standards are applied and interpreted.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments.
The Specific Plan amendment will not require any physical modifications in order to be implemented. All appropriate infrastructure is already in place. Several of the proposed amendments are designed to allow the specific plan to be more consistent with the existing infrastructure. Other proposed amendments will provide clarifications to elements of the plan that will enhance usability of the document.
D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Many of the proposed amendments are designed to ensure consistency with the existing built environment. In addition, other proposed amendments are designed to provide clarifications that will enhance the usability of the specific plan. Overall, the amendments will help ensure the development of a desirable character that will be compatible with future proposed development in the specific plan area.
Section 4. Specific Plan Amendment. The City Council hereby amends the Uptown Specific Plan to read as provided in Exhibit "A", attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as set forth in full. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the certified Uptown Temecula EIR (SCH #2013061012).
Section 5. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
Section 7. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of ,
Jessica Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2026- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , , and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
5 Exhibit B - Specific Plan Amendment
Proposed Amendments to the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Chapter 3.0 Design Standards
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
c. Section 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting — Remove all reference to Silva Cell for understory planting requirements
2. Chapter 4.0 Appendix
a. Specify that Platanus x acerifolia Bloodgood' variety of California Sycamore is to be used throughout the Specific Plan Area when a Sycamore is called for b. Section 4.1.1 Recommended Plan List by District — Remove the Fern Pine and replace it with...
c. Remove "Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Bluff Exposed Aggregate Finish" and associated images throughout the Design Guidelines
d. Remove the Silva Cell requirements and the associated cut sheets e. Replace the product cut sheets for pedestrian lights and streetlights Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan
3. Chapter 1 Introduction & Overview
a. Subsection 8 Appendices of Chapter B Plan Organization, add a reference to Appendix "G — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards"
8. Appendices
The appendices include the following reference documents:
A. Glossary of Terms
B. General Plan Consistency
C. Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment
D. New Streets In -Lieu Fee
E. Landscape Plant List
F. Conceptual Case Studies
G. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards
4. Chapter 2 Plan Administration
a. Table 2-2 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan — Phased Compliance Matrix - Add note to prevent the piecemealing of projects
Table 1: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan - Phased Compliance Matrix Scope of Development Proposal
Corresponding Planning
Specific Plan Compliance
A plication Tye
Required
Any project that proposes the adaptive
Adaptive Reuse Application
Adaptive Reuse Standards
reuse of an existing building.
A proposed change or modification to the
Sign Permit
Architectural Design Guidelines
exterior of an existing building without the
Sign Program
addition of new square footage. ' 2
Minor Modification
Major Modification
Building additions totaling 10% or less of
Minor Modification
Relative to the new addition
only:
the existing square footage on a project
Major Modification
site in existence prior to the adoption of
• Architectural Design
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plana
Guidelines
• Si na a Standards
Building additions greater than 10% and
Major Modification
Relative to the new addition
only:
up to 50% of the existing square footage
on a project site in existence prior to the
• Architectural Design
adoption of the Uptown Temecula
Guidelines
Specific Plana
. Signage Standards
• Building Type Standards
• Frontage Type Standards
• Building Placement
Standards
• Maximum Building Height
Standards
• Parking Placement
Standards
• Minimum Parking Space
Requirements
Building additions greater than 50% of
Major Modification
All specific plan requirements
the existing square footage on a project
apply (including land uses)
site in existence prior to the adoption of
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, or
proposed additions which exceed 50% of
the current market value of the existing
structure (s) on a project site (as
determined by an appraisal certification)
New development proposals
Development Plan
All specific plan requirements
apply (including land uses
'Examples include: paint color changes, patio additions, addition of awnings, material changes, relocation of window and door, etc.
2AI1 additions and/or modifications shall be cumulative over the projects life to prohibit piecemeal changes to development.
Chapter 3: Land Use and Development Standards
a. Table 3-1 Land Use Matrix — Amend the use matrix to implement the provisions of the Live Entertainment Ordinance (Ord. No. 2022-06
List of Uses
UHT
US JJFCV
CV -CO
Alcoholic beverages sales
See Municipal Code Semi»» 17 10 020-S„ plemental Development Standards Chapter 17.10 Alcohol
Residential care facilities
-
C
(seven to twelve) 2
Residential care facilities for
-
P
-
-
the elder) six or fewer)2
Residential care facilities for
C
the elderly (seven to twelve) 2
Residential-live/work
-
-
P
P
-
P
-
-
Restaurant (bona fide eating
P
P
P
P
-
P
P
-
establishment) without the
sale of alcohol
Restaurant (bona fide eating
P
P
P
P
P
P
establishment) with the sale of
beer and wine'
Restaurant (bona fide eating
C
C
C
C
-
C
C
-
establishment) with the sale of
beer, wine, and distilled
s ip rits7
Restaurant (bona fide public
P
P
P
P
P
P
eating establishment) with
entertainment (not including
—
—
—
—
—
—
dancin
Restaurant (bona fide public
P
P
P
P
P
P
eating establishment) with
entertainment and/or dancinq�
FOOTNOTES:
'Subject to the Standards for Specific Uses outlined in Section 3.C. 2 Subject to the State of California Department of Social Services licensing requirements. 3 Full -service hotels (see definition in appendix) of up to 8 stories in height are permitted by right in the Uptown Hotel/Tourism District.
4 Office uses are permitted above the first floor only. However, office uses may be permitted on the first floor when the office use does not directly front onto any street included any future street. 5 Residential uses are permitted above the first floor only. 6 All new development on a vacant parcel or redevelopment of a parcel within an Overlay area shall conform to the allowable uses of the Overlay as specified. Additionally, until such time that a parcel within an Overlay area is redeveloped by adding more than 50% of the existing square footage on the project site, or by proposed addition which exceeds 50% of the current market value of the existing structure(s) on site, (as specified in Table 2-2 of the UTSP), land uses within a legal non -conforming building may be those uses that are allowed within the underlying District, as specified in Table 3-1.
Subject to the supplemental Development Standards in Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 17.10 9.10 and 9.11 b. Table 3-9 Parking Requirements — All Districts — include a requirement of all development to include 10% bicvcle parking
Table -2: Parking Requirements -All Districts
Land Use
Required Parking Space Ratio
ResidentiaI2
1.75 spaces per dwelling unit
Retail/Service Commercial 1,2
2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
Offices
2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
1.0 space per guest room or suite (ancillary conference rooms, Hotels
meeting rooms and ballrooms within the hotel shall be parked separately at 2.0 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA
Daycare, nursery school?
1 space per 2 employees, plus 1 space per 5 children, based on facility capacity
Elementary and junior high
1.5 spaces per classroom, plus 1 space per 5 fixed seats in school (Kindergarten through
auditorium, gymnasium or similar public assembly facility (35 SF = 5 eighth grade)-?
fixed seats)
High school (ninth through
8 spaces per classroom
twelfth grade)
College or university2
1 space per employee, plus 4 spaces per 10 students based on maximum classroom capacity
Trade or vocational schools
2 spaces per 3 people based on maximum number of students and staff, or 1 space per 35 SF of instruction GFA
Religious Institutions
1 space per 3 fixed seats and 1 space per 35 SF of assembly (where there are no fixed seats) (without daycare or school uses) May require a parking analysis for certain uses where assembly or large number of customers are anticipated.
2 Bicycle parking shall be rovided at a rate of 10% of vehicles aces with a minimum of ten 10 spaces c. Section I Street Cross Section Standards — Replace the existing street cross sections with the following:
BUECKING DR
E_X_ R.O.W. 78'
EX ROADWAY: 50
now
14' 8'
DRIVE LANE PARALLEL L? 51
PARK3N G!
euLsour
CALLE CORTEZ
EX_ R_O W- 6T
EX _ ROADWAY- 4B'
R_O.W
I
r!--ZNG! ISE❑LANELBOLIT eu>-sour
COMMERCE CENTER
EX. R_O W-66'
EX_ ROADWAY- 44' If
� I
a• ,a, ,a, a•
�.. LS PARKINGf 4-
DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE PARH3NGI LS -�
RAfSED RAISED
DEL RIO RD
Ex. ROW= 7s'
EX_ ROADWAY- 48'
ANK
SW LS PARKING! BIKE pRIVE LANE DRIVEf LANE PARKINGI LS -..
RAISED LANE LA!!E RAfSED
ENTERPRISE N & S
EX_ROW-78'
EX. ROADWAY56'
ANGLE. PARKING DRNE iANE DRIVE LANE PA
- SW
ENTERPRISE CIRCLE W
EX_ R O W- 60
EX_ ROADWAY- 4,W
rk
a- a is vas s' a
SW LS PARKING pRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE PARKING! LS SW
RAISED RAISED
DULeour -LBGLT
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW. 100,
EX. ROADWAY_ 76'
�* min
e'
SW Le PARHING RUINS .—E LANE DRIVE LANE RAISEDEIEDIAN
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. R.O.W. 1OO'
EX. ROADWAY: 76'
R.I.W
6' &
DRIVE LAVE DRIVE LANE LS 5LY
LANE
R.6.W so
B'
JEFFERSON AVE
EX_ ROW 112,
EX ROADWAY: IN
sW UNE DRIVE IANE MVEIANE ryRNN UME *VRN VWE M DRIIZ—E oRrvEIANE uNE aN
JEFFERSON AVE
EX ROW:1OP
EX ROADWAY_ TT
w
R.I W
SeE"tIiE` JEFFERSON AVE
EX. R.O.W: 16O'
EX. ROADWAY: 76'
Ate, wr• r-
49 NW LS DRIVE
LANE DRIVE LANE CENTER TURN pRIVE LONE DRIVELANE 1U1- EIKE L:- LA,w F R LANE R IN,
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. R.O. W: 100'
EX. ROADWAY: 76'
ROW ` Rw
r■rr■rrorror ��:r■� ' � �
q.
�,. LS DRNE LANE DRIVE LANE TllRNLANE 7VRN LANE M DRIVE LANE DRIVE LONE LINE
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROW : 100'
EX. ROADWAY. 76'
ROW
EX. ROADWAY V 76'
� _� r r
r !6\
FEE
I1� AIR�W
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. R.O.W: 100'
EX. ROADWAY. 76'
R.I.w
� n
I I�
14'
Shy LANE FeA DRIVE LANE DRNELFNE MEDfAN DRIVE IANE DRIVE LANE f>� BiKE
JEFFERSON AVE
EX. ROADWAY: 86'
R. G:rY
11, e'
RIGHT TURN DRIVE LONE ❑RIVE LANE LEFT LEFT R DRIVE LAkE DRIVE LANE FEE BIKE LANE TURN LANE TURN LANE M lANE
LAS HACEINDAS ST
EX_ RE) W- 70
EX. ROADWAY: 48'
A
.^�W PARKING! BIKE pRIVELANE DR IVE LANE PARKING! SEDDUT M AVE
EX ROW 1
EX ROW goo'
EX. ROADWAY76'
R.i:w V
1 II.
W 4' 9' 9'
SW LG RA15Ep gNCgOIIT DRNE iANE D UNE N DRNE LANE RAISED B—OUT SW
MADISON AVE
EX. R.O.W: 78'
EX. ROADWAY: 56'
R_i.w Row
T-A
SW IS PARALLEL DRIVE LANE CENTER TURN pR3VE LANE PARALLEL LS SVU
PPRKING LONE PARKING
McCABE CT
EX. R.O.W: 78'
EX. ROADWAY: 56'
R.o.w R.a.w
9' 5' 4' ]'
SW LS ANGLED PARKING .-EiANE pRNE LANE PARALLEL LS SW
PARKING
RIDER WAY
EX. R-OW= GG'
EK ROADWAY: 44'
I �
silo ■
a' e• 1a' s' a' -
GW L. PARKING! DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE nARKIN G! LS ,�rV
RAISE.
RAISE.
RL]LRDUT --ul
EX. ROW: 100' _
EX. ROADWAY: 76'
RA. W R.-
LS VEE LOl
} i Ail i
SW DRINE C N L
DRIVE LANE S SW
VIA MONTEZUMA
EX. RD.W: 76'
EX. ROADWAY: 48'
so• a' e' r n' n• 5' e• a• w
�W w 61KE ❑RNE LONE ❑RIVE LANE 9q(E L5 SW
RwisEo uNE LANE rsasEo
auLeauT
d. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Add Subsection vii vii. All development or redevelopment projects that propose or require for development any new street or roadway within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area shall submit, at the time of application, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, a road alignment study which shall:
• Demonstrate alignment conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Future Streets; or • Propose an alternative alignment, which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or ,greater connectivity than Exhibit 3-13:
Proposed Future Streets, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. e. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Implement a new street naming convention for new streets
4. New Street Naming Convention
Identity and neighborhood character is a recurring theme and a goal of the community in the creation of this specific plan (Recommendation No. 3) and a well -planned street naming convention will enhance the unique character of the 6 distinct districts in this specific plan. Any new street constructed within this specific plan area shall be named accordingly:
i. All new streets that have primarily an East — West direction of travel shall continue the numbered street names originating in Old Town, starting with "7th Street", the Southernmost East — West street proposed, and increasing in number by 1 (one) each East — West street constructed north of the proposed "7th Street." ii. All new streets that have primarily a North — South direction of travel shall select a name for the street that relates to the district from which the new street originates. The name shall be of significant importance to the district from which it originates, such as, but not limited to:
• The name of a communitv leader. artist. musician or a person of historical significance
• The name of plants or animals shall be limited to those native to the local area • Other names of significance. as approved by the Communitv Development Director
iii. When a street traverses throw h multiple districts within this specific plan area, the development project that first constructed or caused the construction of the road shall propose the name based on its district location within the specific plan and the naming convention in this section
v. All new streets, regardless of district or direction, shall submit, in writing, the proposed street name to the Director of Community Development for approval. It shall be the Community Development Director's sole discretion to approve and/or amend proposed street names within this specific plan area.
f. Section G Block and Circulation Standards — Change "hypothetical street grid" to "proposed street grid" throughout the section
5. Block Standards
In order to facilitate the urban development patterns and intensification of land uses that are envisioned for this specific plan, smaller blocks and additional streets are required. The following block standards work in conjunction with existing streets and the proposed'�•me� street grid desired for the specific plan area. For the purposes of implementing this section:
g. Exhibit 3-13 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Development of New Streets" to "Proposed Development of New Streets" and correct any reference throughout the section
Exhibit 3-13 illustrates the proposed hypothetieal development of a street grid in future Uptown Jefferson.
The sketch on the left illustrates the existing street grid, and the sketch on the right illustrates proposed peteatial future streets (dashed lines) that could be added to the existing network. The result is a network of smaller blocks which are more walkable and pedestrian -scaled.
h. Exhibit 3-14 — Change the title of the exhibit from "Hypothetical Street Network" to "Proposed Street Network" and correct any reference throughout the section Exhibit -2: Proposed Wypothetieal Street Network
i. Table 3-14 Block Standards — Add a reference to the bottom of the table referring to the road alignment study required for new roads and any deviation would require the written approval of the Director of Public Works
Table-3: Block Standards
District Name
Maximum Block
Length (any side
Maximum Perimeter
Uptown Center (UC)
600 ft.
2,100 ft.
Urban Hotel/Tourist (UHT)
600 ft.
2,100 ft.
Transit/Sports District (US)
600 ft.
2,100 ft.
Urban Arts District (UA)
450 ft.
1,500 ft.
Creekside Village (CV)
450 ft.
1,500 ft.
New development projects that propose or require new roads as part of their development shall submit, at the time of application, to the Director of Public Works for approval, a road alignment study that either demonstrates conformity to Exhibit 3-13: Proposed Street Network or provides an alternative road alignment study which shall demonstrate strict adherence to Table 3-14: Block Standards and provide equal or greater connectivity as Exhibit 3-14: Proposed Street Network.
S;tr,Q,Qt Nipbuork as desely as possible (Exhibit 3-14). if not feasible to de so, as may be in serne Gases, the developer must previde reasonable justifir_;;tien c;hAW M ng diffiGUIty in following the GenGeptual street grid Retwork and shall alse prepese aR alternatove street layeut that fA_llA_i.A.xs the BIGGk Soze Street Network.
j. Item b) "Utility Furnishing Zone" of Subsection 1 "Establishment of Sidewalk Zones" of Section H "Sidewalk Standards" — Add item V and VI containing language to state that no utility fixtures are permitted above grade (visible) within the Utility Furnishing Zone
v. No utilitv fixtures are to be located within the utilitv furnishing zone without the written authorization of the Director of Public Works.
vi. Early coordination with utilityprovidersis necessary for a satisfactory placement of required utility furnishings, lack of coordination on part of the applicant or developer shall not cause blight on the streetscape within this specific plan area. Written evidence of earlv consultation efforts will be reauired at time of submittal to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
6. Chapter 4: Architectural Standards
a. Exhibit 4-11 Allowable Frontage Types —Modify the graphics to show the correct building placement for Arcade and High Arcade frontage types
b. Replace the term "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency throughout the chapter
3. High T441 Arcade Frontage Type
The High T411 Arcade frontage type is a fagade that is similar to the Arcade frontage type, except the High T444 Arcade's colonnade is taller than one story. Like the Arcade frontage type, the High Tall Arcade's colonnade is also covered by upper stories. The ground floor fagade is aligned at the build -to line and the upper stories extend out to the property line but do not encroach into the public right-of-way. The build -to line is shown as the solid red line in the following sketches. The High Tall Arcade frontage type is ideal for retail when the adjacent sidewalk is fully accessible from the colonnade so that pedestrians can easily access the retail uses.
The walkway located under the High Tail Arcade shall be at the same grade as the sidewalk in order to allow for pedestrian access and flow between the public right- of-way and the area covered by the High T-A Arcade.
c. Exhibits 4-18, 4-19, and 4-20 — replace "Tall Arcade" with "High Arcade" for consistency
S
Exhibit-4: High Tall Arcade Isometric View
Exhibit -3: High T-a4 Arcade Site Plan View
i
F2 C
m
T
4 E
Exhibit-5: High Tali Arcade Cross Section View
7. Chapter 5: Design Guidelines
a. Exhibits 5-3, and 5-4 — Modify the graphics to show the correct placement of the building on the Build To Line and Property Line.
b. Section E Utility Guidelines — Add language to require early consultation with utility providers (water, electricity, and gas)
ix. Early consultation with Rancho California Water District shall shoul occur in order to ensure that equipment is placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact. Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time of application.
iii. Early coordination with Southern California Edison shall shoul occur in order to ensure that transformers are placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact, and to ensure that transformers are well screened and in
compliance with utility provider's standards. Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time of application.
V. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate screening methods shall should occur early in the project design process. Such efforts shall be presented in writing to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the time of application.
c. Item b) Street Lighting of Subsection 3 Street Furnishings of Section I Streetscape Guidelines — As presently adopted, the spacing for streetlights is left to the discretion of the Director of Public Works. This proposed ordinance would specify the spacing of streetlights is sixty (60) feet or as determined by the Director of Public Works. This distance has proven effective for the ongoing development and shall be applied throughout the Specific Plan area b) Street Lighting
i. New streetlights shall be placed at sixty (60) foot intervals or as determined by the Director of Public Works.
ii. Lighting shall comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
a. Update and expand the definition of "Restaurant" for compliance with the Live Entertainment Ord. (Ord. No. 2022-06)
i. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) without alcohol" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods and nonalcoholic beverages prepared, served, and consumed on the premises. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment.
ii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer and wine sales" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, and wine prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment with beer and wine sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of any food prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of
operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged, and no required
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order entertainment involving dancing
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
iii. "Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine and distilled spirits" means any establishment where the primary business is the preparation, service, and retail sales of meals comprising a varied selection of foods, nonalcoholic beverages, beer, wine, and distilled spirits, prepared, served, and consumed on the premises.
To be classified as a restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with beer, wine, and distilled spirit sales, an establishment shall meet the following requirements:
1. Be designed and operated in such a way that the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the primary restaurant operation.
2. The sale of any food prepared for consumption off the premises shall be occasional only and clearly ancillary and subordinate to the on -premises restaurant operation.
3. On any day the restaurant is open to the public for business and engaged in the ancillary sale of alcoholic beverages, restaurant services shall be available to the public during all hours of operation. Restaurant service shall include, but not be limited to, an offering and the ability to order a varied menu of foods of not less than five main courses with appropriate nonalcoholic beverages, desserts, and other attendant dishes.
4. No entertainment shall be provided without an active and valid entertainment license.
5. No admission charge can be charged. and no reauired
purchase/donation is required (such as a minimum drink order) for entertainment involvingdancing,
ancing_
6. Entertainment establishments that allow dancing shall be considered a class III establishment pursuant to Section 9.10.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Notice of Public Hearin
THE CITY OF TEMECULA - 41000 Main Street- Temecula, CA 92590 — TemeculaCA.gov A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter(s) described below:
Case No.: LR26-0139
Applicant: City of Temecula
Proposal: An amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards to provide various clarifications and additions designed to enhance usability of the document.
Environmental Action: Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required. If the project is approved, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the County Clerk of the Board.
Case Planner: Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115
PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: May 6, 2026
TIME OF HEARING: 10:00 AM
The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA. og_v and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public review at the meeting.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.
City of Temecula
Community Development
41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590
Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • Fax (951 ) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov
VIA -ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL
[email protected]
, 2026
Supervising Legal Certification Clerk
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 751
Riverside, CA 92501-0751
SUBJECT: Notice of Determination for Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, an amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to provide various clarifications and additions designed to enhance the usability of the document Dear Sir/Madam:
Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a receipt in the amount of $2,966.75 for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee.
Please email a copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Eric Jones at (951) 506-5115 or email at [email protected]
Sincerely,
Matt Peters
Director of Community Development
Attachments: Notice of Exemption Form
Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt
Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office:
City of Temecula
Community Development
Planning Division
Notice of Determination
TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula
P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street
Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code
State Clearinghouse No.: EIR Addendum for SCH# 2013061012 Project Title: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment
Project Location: Generally located west of Interstate 15, south of Cherry Street, and north of Rancho California Road
Project Description: Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, an amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to provide various clarifications and additions designed to enhance the usability of the document.
Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside
Contact Person: Eric Jones
Telephone Number: (951) 506-5115
This is to advise you that the City Council for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on Month, Day, 2026 and has made the following determinations regarding this project:
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. That an EIR Addendum was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project.
4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project.
5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project.
6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required.
This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments, responses, and record of project approval is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590.
Signature:
Date:
Matt Peters, Director Community Development
Notice of Public Hearing
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below.
Case No.: Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment
Applicant: City of Temecula
Location: The Uptown Specific Plan area, generally located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road/Murrieta Creek and south of Cherry Street.
Proposal: Long Range Planning Project Number LR26-0139, Amending the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to added needed clarifications to improve the implementation of the Plan.
Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Specific Plan amendment will not have a significant impact upon the environment based on a completed EIR Addendum. As a result, the City Council will take action on a recommendation to adopt an EIR Addendum in compliance with CEQA Section 15164.
PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA
City of Temecula, Council Chambers
DATE OF HEARING: July 28, 2026
TIME OF HEARING: 3:00 PM
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Eric Jones, City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 506-5115.
City of Temecula
Community Development
41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590
Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • Fax (951 ) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov
VIA -ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL
[email protected]
, 2026
Supervising Legal Certification Clerk
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 751
Riverside, CA 92501-0751
SUBJECT: Notice of Determination for Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, an amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to provide various clarifications and additions designed to enhance the usability of the document Dear Sir/Madam:
Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a receipt in the amount of $2,966.75 for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee.
Please email a copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Eric Jones at (951) 506-5115 or email at [email protected]
Sincerely,
Matt Peters
Director of Community Development
Attachments: Notice of Exemption Form
Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt
Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office:
City of Temecula
Community Development
Planning Division
Notice of Determination
TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula
P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street
Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code
State Clearinghouse No.: EIR Addendum for SCH# 2013061012 Project Title: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment
Project Location: Generally located west of Interstate 15, south of Cherry Street, and north of Rancho California Road
Project Description: Long Range Planning Project No. LR26-0139, an amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to provide various clarifications and additions designed to enhance the usability of the document.
Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside
Contact Person: Eric Jones
Telephone Number: (951) 506-5115
This is to advise you that the City Council for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on Month, Day, 2026 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: