Thousand Oaks City Council
July 11, 2023

4. The project has been reviewed in conformance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (TOMC Section 9-4.2803(c)(4)).

The proposed Special Use Permit has been reviewed for conformance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. For this application, the City is the Lead Agency and, on behalf of the Applicant, the City Council is being asked to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the project.

The Final EIR identifies where all areas listed as potentially significant have been mitigated to levels that are no longer significant, through the inclusion of mitigation measures, which the applicant shall comply with under the proposed conditions of approval.

5. The proposed use at the proposed location will be compatible with land uses in the vicinity (TOMC Section 9-4.2803(c)(5)).

The potential use involving sale and consumption of alcohol at the project site will be compatible with land uses in the vicinity that are predominantly commercial and industrial uses, including an existing restaurant located within the Amgen headquarter building located at 1 Amgen Center Drive, 7-Eleven retail use across Rancho Conejo Boulevard, and gas station at the northwest corner of the subject property. The commercial spaces which could be leased by tenants seeking to serve alcohol are clustered close to the West Hillcrest Drive and Rancho Conejo Boulevard intersection and are physically separated from the residential uses on the adjacent property to the east by onsite multifamily structures, parking areas, and landscaping. Conversely, as the commercial uses will be open to the public it is anticipated to be an amenity to those living in the adjacent residential development and those working in the adjacent industrial and commercial developments. Therefore, the project will be compatible with the land uses in the vicinity.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said application for 2022- 70779-SUP is approved by City Council, subject to conformance with the conditions set forth and attached hereto and made a part hereof. Except as otherwise expressly indicated, said conditions shall be fully performed and completed, or at the City’s discretion, shall be secured by bank or cash deposit or other security satisfactory to the City Attorney before the use or occupancy of the property is commenced and before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. The violation of any of the conditions of said Special Use Permit shall be grounds for revocation by the Planning Commission or City Council.

This decision became final under Section 9-4.2803(a)(1) of the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code when the City Council voted on and rendered its decision at the end of the above-referenced public hearing. As stated on the City Council’s written and posted agenda, all applicants, appellants, parties and persons affected by or having any interest in this matter should note that this final decision of the Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

City Council, and any other City action on this entitlement application, is subject to a judicial review under Section 1094.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.

Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, a judicial review of that decision must be filed within 90 days of that City Council decision. Other statutes, however, may shorten the statute of limitations, or may impose different filing requirements.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this XXX day of XXXX, 202X, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:
______________________________
Kevin McNamee, Mayor
City of Thousand Oaks, California
ATTEST/CERTIFY:
_______________________________
Laura B. Maguire, City Clerk
Date Attested: ___________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of the City Attorney
____________________________________
Patrick J. Hehir, Chief Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO ADMINISTRATION:
____________________________________
Andrew P. Powers, City Manager
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the City of Thousand Oaks City Council on the date cited above.

Item No. 10B
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2022-70779-SUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

STANDARD

1. Land and Application – The Special Use Permit is granted for the land described in the application, any attachment thereto, and as shown on the submitted “Project Plan Set,” dated May 26, 2023.

2. Scope of Permit Approval – The Special Use Permit is granted to allow the sale and consumption of alcohol, for future restaurants located within the commercial portion of a mixed-use project through the review and approval of a Minor Modification application for each proposed use as shown on the submitted “Project Plan Set,” dated May 26, 2023.

3. Approval Period – The above referenced permits are granted for the period set forth in 2022-70777-DAGR.

4. Approval Contingency –Approval for the Special Use Permit is contingent upon the adoption or approval of Land Use General Plan Amendment (LU) 2021-70169-LU; Zoning Change (Z) 2022-70776-Z; Specific Plan (SP) 2022-70778-SP; Development Agreement (DAGR) 2022-70777-DAGR; Development Permit (DP) 2022-70773-DP; Protected Tree Permit (PTP) 2022-70780-PTP; and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 2022-70774- EIR.

5. Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations – The applicant shall at all times comply with any and all local, city, county, state and federal laws, regulations and orders now in effect or which may hereafter be enacted pertaining to the approved modification or affecting the installation, operation or maintenance of the mixed-use development.

6. Regulatory Agency Approval – The requirements of all applicable regulatory agencies shall be met, and approval obtained, prior to gas release, Certificate of Occupancy, or as authorized by the City's Building and Safety Division. Copies of all required licenses shall be submitted to the Community Development Department.

7. Payment of Fees – Approval is subject to the applicant paying all fees and assessments to the City of Thousand Oaks, as required by the Municipal Code.

8. Acknowledgment – The applicant acknowledges that all aspects of this project are of special concern to and regulated by the City of Thousand Oaks, which has established specific criteria and standards concerning development within the City. Any change, modification, or alteration to improvements on the subject property shall first be approved by the City of Thousand Oaks. Any unauthorized changes may require future corrective work and may result in a City Code compliance effort.

Item No. 10B
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2022-70779-SUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

9. Unauthorized Changes – The applicant acknowledges that the exterior treatment, location of structures and architectural features of the development are of special concern to, and regulated by, the City of Thousand Oaks, which has established criteria and standards concerning development within the City. Any substantial change, modification, or alteration to the architectural design, or in the exterior treatment of any building and structure, including building colors, materials, changes in walkways, doorways, window locations, or in the parking, landscaping and other related features, must first be approved by the City of Thousand Oaks prior to performing the work. Unauthorized change(s) or failure to comply with the conditions of this permit may require future corrective work and result in a City Code violation and appropriate action.

10. Indemnification – The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officials, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officials or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense.

11. Signed Acceptance of Conditions – A signed Acceptance of Conditions affidavit shall be executed by the applicant and property owner, or his duly authorized representative, and shall be returned to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.

12. Other Applicable Permits – All entitlements and conditions of approval associated with related development, including 2021-70169-LU; 2022- 70776-Z; 2022-70778-SP; 2022-70777-DAGR; 2022-70773-DP; 2022- 70780-PTP; and 2022-70774-EIR apply. In addition, all entitlements and conditions of approval associated with prior onsite development approved by the City of Thousand Oaks (OTP 1235, Z 1977-419, SUP 2001-1037, DP 1977-371 and Minor Modification Nos. 1 through 4, DP 1982-512 and Minor Modification Nos. 1 through 4, and SUP 2001-1037) are rescinded, voided and of no further effect. The property’s Title Report is to be updated to remove references to Covenants, Agreements and Declarations required by the permits which are rescinded, voided and of no further effect.

13. Transferable Permit – The Special Use Permit may be transferable to a new owner/lease provided that the operation is of similar type to the approved use and provide that the new owner/lease agrees to all imposed conditions of the existing special use permit, subject to an administrative review and determination by the Community Development and Thousand Oaks Police Departments.

Item No. 10B
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2022-70779-SUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

14. Revocation of Permit – Any verified complaints of excessive levels of noise, violations of conditions of this permit or other nuisance issues related to the operation of the business, shall constitute grounds for initiation of proceedings to consider revocation of this Special Use Permit Major Modification and/or further restriction of the hours of operation by the Planning Commission.

15. Title 24 Requirements – All requirements of the California Uniform Building Code Title 24, California Code of Regulations, shall be met, as required by law.

RESTRICTIONS

16. Hours of Operation – The sale and consumption of alcohol shall be limited to the hours of operation for the subject restaurant or tenant space.

17. Personnel – The licensee shall have readily identifiable personnel to monitor and control the behavior of customers inside the building premises, and any adjacent property under the establishment’s control to ensure the areas are free of people loitering or causing a disturbance, and that these areas are cleared of patrons within 30 minutes after closing.

Sale and service of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted only during normal business hours and only when food service is also available.

The business staff shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which he has control free of litter.

18. Alcoholic Beverage Permit and Approvals – Prior to the onsite sale of alcoholic beverages, the applicant shall receive all necessary permits and approvals from any applicable County, State or Federal agencies and shall comply with all requirements of the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

19. Off-Premise Sales Prohibited – Any sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises is strictly prohibited. The consumption of alcoholic beverages is limited to the interior bar area and as allowed per Liquor License Type 48 through the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

20. Employee Training – Employees involved in the sale or service of alcoholic beverages shall provide evidence that they have either:

Item No. 10B
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2022-70779-SUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

a. Completed training given by the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) in Leadership and
Education in Alcohol and Drugs program (LEAD), or equivalent as determined by the Police Department, and retain such certificate of completion, or
b. Have completed an accepted equivalent by the ABC’s local office to ensure proper distribution of beer, wine and distilled spirits to adults of legal age. If any prospective employee designated to sell alcoholic beverages does not currently have such training, then,
c. The ABC licensed proprietors shall confirm with the Police Department’s Crime Prevention Bureau, within 30 days of the Planning Commission’s entitlement approval, that a date certain has been scheduled with the local ABC office to complete the LEAD course.
d. Within 30 days of taking said course, the employees, or responsible employer shall deliver copies of each required course completion certificate to the Police Department’s Crime Prevention Bureau.
e. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant and/or the restaurant management staff to provide the employees with the knowledge and skills that will enable them to comply with their responsibilities under state and city laws and ordinances.

21. Noise Control – Proposed restaurant operations shall be conducted inside the establishment only. During restaurant hours, all exterior doors of the Amenity Building shall be kept closed. Sound volume during restaurant operations shall be regulated to ensure that the restaurant operations cannot be heard from off-site residential properties. It shall be the responsibility of the business owner and bar operator to ensure noise generated by the café operations will be confined to the interior of the establishment.

22. Live Entertainment – Live entertainment shall not be allowed unless otherwise approved by the Community Development Department.

23. Security – The Thousand Oaks Police Department reserves the right to make further comments or conditions related to security or safety prior to issuance of occupancy permits, and the applicant will correct any safety or security concerns upon written notice by the Police Department within the time period set forth in any such notice.

The applicant shall notify the Thousand Oaks Police Department representative at least one week prior to special entertainment events, which are reasonably anticipated to attract a larger or different patronage.

Item No. 10B
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2022-70779-SUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

The Police Department reserves the right to require security personnel for such events

24. Revocation – If after written notice from the Police Department or City of Thousand Oaks, and subsequent failure to comply with such notice, regarding confirmed violations of the Municipal Code, including but not limited to excessive noise disturbances, unruly or violent incidents, illicit use or sale of drugs, alcohol-related violations, or violations of imposed conditions on any City permit, the City may initiate revocation proceedings.

A request for revocation of this permit shall be referred to the Planning Commission.

25. Transferable Permit – This Special Use Permit may be transferred to another owner/lessee provided the operation is in substantial conformance with the approved use and provided that the new owner/lessee agrees to all imposed conditions of the existing Special Use Permit, subject to an administrative review and determination by the Community Development Department.

26. Permits from Other Agencies – Prior to commencement of any foodservice operations and/or alcohol consumption, the applicant shall receive all necessary permits and approvals from any applicable County, State or Federal agencies.

27. Compliance with Other Laws – The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local laws including COVID-19 regulations. Violation of any of those laws in connection with the use authorized herein will be cause for initiation of revocation proceedings.

28. Alcoholic Beverages – The on-site sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages shall require the filing of a Minor Modification application to 2022–70779–SUP for review and consideration by the Community Development Department.

POLICE DEPARTMENT

29. Interior and Exterior Activities – The applicant shall have readily identifiable personnel to monitor and control the behavior of customers inside the building premises, and any adjacent property under the establishment’s control (i.e. interior plaza area) to ensure the areas are free of people loitering or causing a disturbance, and that these areas are cleared of patrons within thirty (30) minutes of closing. a. Any entertainment provided shall not be audible beyond the area under control of the licensee(s).
b. To maintain the restaurant licensing for the sale of alcohol and the restaurant use approved by this body, the quarterly gross Item No. 10B
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2022-70779-SUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed the gross sales of food during the same period. The licensee shall at all times maintain records which reflect separately the gross sale of food and the gross sales of alcoholic beverages of the licensed business. Said records shall be kept no less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made available to the Police Department on demand.
c. Full meal service shall be available to patrons at all times alcoholic beverage sale privileges are being exercised. d. The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises is prohibited.
e. No alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on any property adjacent to the licensed premises under the control of the licensee(s).
f. Loitering is prohibited on these premises or the area under control of the licensee(s).
g. The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control. h. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee(s) and/or property owner shall be removed or painted over within 48 hours of being applied and the affected area shall match the originally-approved exterior color.

30. Employee Training – Employees involved in the sale or service of alcoholic beverages shall provide evidence that they have either of the following:
a. Completed training given by the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) through an administered “Leadership and Education in Alcohol and Drugs” (LEAD)
Program in the form of an ABC issued certificate; or
b. Have completed an accepted equivalent by the ABC to ensure proper distribution of beer, wine and distilled spirits to adults of legal age.
c. If any prospective employee designated to sell alcoholic beverages does not currently have such training, then,
i. The ABC-licensed proprietors shall confirm with the Police Department’s Intelligence Led Policing Unit: Special Projects and Technology, a minimum of 90 days prior to occupancy of the tenant space that a date certain has been scheduled with the local ABC office to complete the LEAD course.

Item No. 10B
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 2022-70779-SUP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70773 Attach 7.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70779-SUP)

ii. Within 30 days of taking said course, the employees, or responsible employer shall deliver copies of each required course completion certificate to the Police Department’s Intelligence Led Policing Unit: Special Projects and
Technology.

It shall be the responsibility of the applicant and/or the restaurant management staff to provide the employees with the knowledge and skills that will enable them to comply with their responsibilities under state and city laws and ordinances.

31. Video Surveillance System – A video surveillance system shall be required for a 360-degree view around and inside the restaurant facility. The surveillance system will be HD quality, have night vision capabilities and be able to retain video data for no less than 30 days. The final number of cameras shall be agreed to by the applicant and representatives of the Police Department and camera footage will be made available to the Thousand Oaks Police Department upon request for viewing.

32. Additional Security Measures and Considerations – The Thousand Oaks Police Department also reserves the right to make further comments or conditions related to security or safety after the issuance of occupancy permits, and the applicant will correct any safety or security concerns upon written notice by the Police Department within the time period set forth in any such notice.
*****
Item No. 10B
cdd:600-60/jk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 8.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS APPROVING A

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LATIGO

HILLCREST, LLC, RELATING TO THE
DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2150
WEST HILLCREST DRIVE (APN #667-0-113-075),

THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA (DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT 2022-70777-DAGR)
The City Council of the City of Thousand Oaks does hereby ordain as follows:

Part I
Based upon the information contained in the Staff Report, exhibits, and public testimony given at a public hearing on June 20, 2023, the City Council approved this Development Agreement with the following findings:

WHEREAS, to strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. (the “Development Agreement Statute”) which authorizes cities to enter into agreements for the development of real property with any person having a legal or equitable interest in such property in order to establish certain development rights in such property; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Development Agreement Statute, the City of Thousand Oaks (the “City”) has adopted regulations (the “Development Agreement Regulations”) to implement procedures for the processing and approval of development agreements in accordance with the Development Agreement Statute, which are contained in Section 9-11.01 et seq. of the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Latigo Hillcrest, LLC (“Developer”) desires to carry out the development of a mixed-use commercial and residential project (“Project”) located at 2150 West Hillcrest Drive (APN 667-0-113-075), (“Property”), consistent with the General Plan, Specific Plan (SP-24), other City rules and regulations, and the Development Agreement and vested entitlements referenced therein; WHEREAS, this Development Agreement (2022-70777-DAGR) will assure the City and the Developer that the Project will proceed as proposed and that the ATTACHMENT #8
Item No. 10B
cdd:600-60/jk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 8.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

Project can proceed without disruption caused by a change in City planning and development policies and requirements, which assurance will thereby reduce the actual or perceived risk of planning, financing, and proceeding with construction of the Project and promote the achievement of the private and public objectives of the Project;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duty noticed public hearing on June 5, 2023 on the Project, during which the Planning Commission received comments from the Developer, City staff, and members of the general public and made a recommendation to the City Council on the Project entitlements and legislative actions.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Thousand Oaks held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project on June 20, 2023, during which the City Council received comments from the Developer, City staff, and members of the general public and approved related entitlements and legislative actions, including a 2022-70774-EIR, 2021-70169-LU, 2022-70776-Z, 2022-70778-SP, 2022-70773- DP, 2022-70779-SUP, 2022-70780-PTP and 2022-70777-DAGR.

Part 2
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Thousand Oaks does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. This Ordinance incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, the Development Agreement (including all exhibits to the Agreement), attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to the provisions of Section 5 hereof.

SECTION 2. This Ordinance is adopted under the authority of Government Code Section 65864 et seq. and pursuant to the City’s “Development Agreement Regulations.”
SECTION 3. In accordance with the Development Agreement Regulations, the City Council hereby finds and determines, as follows:
(a) The Development Agreement is consistent with the goals and policies of the Thousand Oaks General Plan and Specific Plan 24, (b) The Development Agreement establishes certain development rights, obligations and conditions for implementation of the Project located at 2150 West Hillcrest Drive (APN 667-0-113-075).

Item No. 10B
cdd:600-60/jk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 8.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

(c) The Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice; (d) The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare;
(e) The Development Agreement will support the orderly development of the Property and the preservation of property values; (f) The project qualifies as a “mixed-use” project consisting of approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial space and 333 units of multi-family residential development, which is a development concept for the Specific Plan area intended to produce a mix of interactive uses, which will create an active and interesting atmosphere in both the site and within nearby properties.

Complementary uses are to be located in close proximity to each other in order to promote interaction between uses to advance the development concept of the Specific Plan.
(g) The project is consistent with the “Commercial/ Residential” land use designation of the Thousand Oaks General Plan.
(h) The architectural design of the project complies with the development standards of SP-24 and the intent of the City’s Architectural Design Review Guidelines, Precise Plan of Design Guidelines, Commercial Design Guidelines, and Freeway Corridor Guidelines.
(i) 2022-70774-EIR was prepared for the subject project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A comprehensive evaluation of the potential environmental impacts for this project was performed. This evaluation determined that the project could have a significant effect on the environment without appropriate mitigation measures in place, therefore an EIR was prepared for the project. Appropriate measures are detailed in the report to ensure appropriate mitigation is in place so no significant adverse environmental impact results from the project. To that end, a mitigation monitoring plan is required to ensure the indicated mitigation measures are applied to the project.

SECTION 4. The foregoing findings and determinations are based upon the following:

Item No. 10B
cdd:600-60/jk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 8.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

(a) The Recitals set forth in this Ordinance, which are deemed true and correct;
(b) The City’s General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment 2021-70169-LU (City Council Resolution No. ________) prior to adoption of this Ordinance;
(c) Resolution Nos. ____________ for the Project entitlements, adopted by the City Council on June 20, 2023, and which Resolutions and exhibits are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full; (d) All City Staff reports (and all other public reports and documents) prepared for the Planning Commission and City Council, relating to the Development Agreement and other actions relating to the Project; (e) All documentary and oral evidence received at public hearings or submitted to the City during the comment period relating to the Development Agreement, and other actions relating to the Project; and
(f) All other matters of common knowledge to the Planning Commission and City Council, including, but not limited to the City’s fiscal and financial status; City policies and regulations; reports, projections and correspondence related to development within and surrounding the City, State laws and regulations and publications.

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject further to such minor, conforming and clarifying changes consistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney to execution thereof, including completion of references and status of planning approvals, and completion and conformity of all exhibits thereto, and conformity to the General Plan, as amended, as approved by the City Council.

SECTION 6. The approval contained in Section 5 hereof is subject to and conditioned upon Resolution No. ____, adopted by the City Council approving the General Plan Amendment, becoming effective.

SECTION 7. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to perform all acts authorized to be performed by the City Manager in the administration of the Development Agreement pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement.

Item No. 10B
cdd:600-60/jk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 8.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

Part 3
(Uncodified)
Severability
SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this title; it being hereby expressly declared that this title, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase hereof, would have been prepared, proposed, adopted, approved and ratified irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Part 4
(Uncodified)
Effective Date
SECTION 9. This ordinance shall become effective on and after the thirtyfirst (31th) day following its adoption, provided, however, that if the actions referred to in Section 6 hereof are not effective on such date, then the effective date of this Ordinance shall be the date on which all of said actions become effective, as certified by the City Clerk.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this XX day of XXXX, 202X, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Kevin McNamee, Mayor
City of Thousand Oaks City Council
ATTEST/CERTIFY:

Laura B. Maguire, City Clerk
Date Attested: ___________________
Item No. 10B
cdd:600-60/jk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 8.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of the City Attorney
Patrick J. Hehir,
Chief Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO ADMINISTRATION:

Andrew P. Powers, City Manager
Introduced: XXXX XX, 202X
Published: XXXX XX, 202XX
Ordinance No.: XXXX-NS
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the City of Thousand Oaks City Council on the date cited above.

Item No. 10B
cdd:600-60/jk/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 8.docx/pz (FILE ID:
2022-70777-DAGR)

EXHIBIT “A”

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(Development Agreement will be attached upon project approval. See Attachment #9) Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

ATTACHMENT #9

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Attn: City Clerk
WITH A COPY TO:

Thomas S. Cohen, Esq.

Cohen Land Use Law, LLP
1534 N. Moorpark Road, #337
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
Email: [email protected]
(Space Above this Line is for Recorder’s Use Only)
This Development Agreement
is recorded at the request and
for the benefit of the City of
Thousand Oaks and is exempt
from the payment of a
recording fee pursuant to
Government Code § 6103.

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
by and between

CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS
and

LATIGO HILLCREST, LLC
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is entered into this ___ day of ________________, 2023, by and among the CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, a California municipal corporation (“City”), on the one hand, and LATIGO HILLCREST, LLC (“Owner”), on the other hand. City and Owner are at times collectively referred to as the “Parties” herein.

EXHIBIT A
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

R E C I T A L S
This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts, understandings, and intentions of the Parties.

A. The State of California adopted the Development Agreement Act to strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk of development. Sections 65865 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code Section (the Development Agreement Act), authorizes City and persons who have legal or equitable interests in real property to enter into a binding development agreement establishing certain development rights in the real property that is the subject of the development project application. City has also codified the process of development agreements in Chapter 11 of Title 9 of the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code (“TOMC”).

B. Throughout this Agreement, including the Recitals contained herein, certain capitalized terms are used which are defined in Section 1 of this Agreement. City and Owner intend to refer to those definitions when the capitalized terms are used.

C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65865, City adopted Title 9, Chapter 11 of the TOMC – Development Agreements (“Development Agreement Ordinance”), further authorizing this Agreement and establishing the City Council’s intent that development agreements be entered into in those situations where the agreement is fair, just and reasonable at the time of its execution; and where it is prompted by the necessities of the situation, or is, by its nature, advantageous to City.

D. Throughout this Agreement the terms “Owner” or “Developer” may be used synonymously, and both refer to LATIGO HILLCREST, LLC.

E. On April 27, 2021, per the applicant Amgen, Inc.’s (“Amgen”) request to change the use of the Property located at 2150 W. Hillcrest Drive from administrative offices to commercial/residential use, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-014, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Thousand Oaks Declaring Intention to Consider an Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan and Allowing Concurrent Processing of Entitlement Applications for Land Located at 2150 W Hillcrest Drive (LU 2021-70169). As part of that Resolution, the City Council approved initiating LU 2021-70169 and allocated 246 residential dwelling units of Citywide Measure E residential capacity to the Property under RCA 2021-70168. On March 29, 2022, City Council approved an extension of time for Amgen to submit its formal application for the proposed project at the site. Subsequent to the City’s authorization of the extension, Amgen transferred its rights to the property and the project applications to Latigo Hillcrest, LLC.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

F. Owner and the City have agreed that the parties should enter into a development agreement pursuant to City’s Development Agreement Ordinance and proceedings have been taken in accordance with the rules and regulations of City and State law.

G. Owner voluntarily enters into this Agreement to implement the General Plan and in consideration for the rights conferred and the procedures specified herein for the development of 2150 W Hillcrest Drive, Thousand Oaks, California A.P.N. Number 667- 0-113-075 (“Property” or “Project site”). City, in the exercise of its legislative discretion, voluntarily enters into this Agreement to implement the General Plan Amendment and in consideration of the agreements and undertakings of Owner as specified herein.

H. Concurrent with this Agreement (2022-70777-DAGR), Owner proposed that City grant Owner the following land use entitlement approvals (hereinafter “Project Approvals”) for the Project (defined below in Section 1 – Definitions) which are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement.
a. General Plan Land Use Amendment No. LU 2021-70169 to Commercial/Residential
b. Specific Plan 2022-70778 (No. 24; with density bonus units in exchange for affordable housing)
c. Zone Change and Zoning Map Amendment 2022-70776
d. Development Permit (DP) 2022-70773
e. Protected Tree Permit No. 2022-70780
f. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 2022-70774
g. Special Use Permit (SUP) 2022-70779
I. During the application process, Owner submitted architectural plans, site plans, landscape plans and grading plans to the City for review by staff. The Parties worked on creating a specific plan (2022-70778-SP) that will govern the development of the Project and identify land use standards for the Property. The Project was approved subject to certain conditions and the approved plan and conditions of approval are attached to this Agreement as Exhibits C and D.

J. City has approved the Project, subject to the associated conditions, and determined that this Agreement is consistent with City’s General Plan and Specific Plan No. 24 and specifically determined that this Agreement: (1) is fair, just and reasonable; (2) is prompted by the necessities of the situation and is by its nature advantageous to Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

City; and, (3) that this Agreement encourages and assures private participation in the construction of housing stock, as determined in the absolute discretion of the City Council.

K. On June 5, 2023, the Planning Commission of City considered the Project, the material terms of this Agreement, and the Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) at a duly noticed public hearing and made appropriate findings that the provisions of this agreement are consistent with the General Plan and recommended approval / disapproval of the Project to City Council.

L. The City Council, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing on June 20, 2023, certified and adopted the Final EIR and associated mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and considered, confirmed, and approved that the Project’s Final EIR adequately addresses the environmental impacts of the Project at the Project Site, including consideration of the Project Approvals, approved the form and material elements of this Agreement, authorized the execution of this Agreement, and found that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with the General Plan, State law, and the Development Agreement Ordinance. The City Council conducted the first reading of the new ordinance on June 20, 2023, followed by the City Council’s second reading of the new ordinance on July 11, 2023.

M. In exchange for the benefits to City listed herein, City agrees to take those actions required to facilitate Owner’s development of the Project, including the approval, adoption, or issuance of necessary development permits and the future ministerial approval of any additional building plans, building permits, occupancy permits, and other such permits necessary to implement the Project (“Ministerial Approvals”) which are consistent with this Agreement.

N. It is the intent of the Parties that all acts referred to in this Agreement shall be accomplished in such a way as to fully comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), state law governing adoption of development agreements, the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code, City’s Development Agreement Ordinance, and applicable development entitlements.

O. This Agreement is made and entered into in consideration of the mutual covenants and in reliance upon the various representations and warranties contained herein. The Parties acknowledge that, in reliance on the agreements, representations, and warranties contained herein, Owner will take certain actions, including making substantial investments and expenditures of monies, relative to the Property and the development thereof.

P. This Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning for and securing orderly development of the Project, provide certainty necessary for the Owner to make significant investments in public infrastructure, public gathering areas, and other improvements, assure the timely and progressive installation of necessary improvements and public services, establish the orderly and measured build-out of the Project consistent Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

with the vision of City’s Specific Plan No. 24 and will provide public benefits to City it would not be entitled to absent this Agreement. All such public improvements or projects are beneficial to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City in general.

Q. The terms of this Agreement support a vital and important interest of City by ensuring the development is consistent with the General Plan, Specific Plan No. 24 and the proposed improvements to the property. The Agreement is necessary to assure Developer that the Project will not be reduced in density, intensity or use, or be subjected to new rules, regulations, ordinances, or policies unless otherwise expressly allowed by this Agreement.

R. In exchange for the benefits to City, Developer desires to receive the General Plan Amendment and other Project Approvals to permit mixed use on the Property, the designated number of residential units allocated for the Project, assurance that it may proceed with the Project in accordance with the Project Approvals and existing land use ordinances and development standards in effect on the Agreement Date, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement and, to secure the benefits afforded Developer by Government Code §65864 et seq., and the City’s Development Agreement Ordinance.

S. For the foregoing reasons, Owner, and the City (each individually, a “Party” and, collectively, the “Parties”) desire to enter into a development agreement for the Project pursuant to the Development Agreement Act and other applicable laws upon the terms and conditions set forth herein and, in the exhibits, attached hereto.

A G R E E M E N T
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above-stated recitals and of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement as well as in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Definitions

1.1. “Agreement” means this Development Agreement, identified as City of Thousand Oaks Development Agreement No. 2022-70777.

1.2. “Agreement Date” means the date this Agreement is executed by both City and Owner.

1.3. “Agreement Effective Date” is the date on which this Agreement is attested by the City Clerk of the City after execution by Owner and Mayor of the City.

1.4. “Applicable Rules and Laws” means the City’s rules, regulations, ordinances, and official policies in force and effect as of the Agreement Effective Date governing permitted uses of the land, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

and size of proposed buildings, parking requirements, setbacks, development standards, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, as well as those rules and laws governing design, improvement, and construction standards, specifications, policies and guidelines applicable to development of the Property, including the General Plan, as amended by the General Plan Amendment, and Specific Plan No. 24, and unless otherwise provided by this Agreement or the Project Approvals.

1.5. “Area Median Income” or “AMI” means the median income for Ventura County, California, adjusted for Actual Household Size, as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 and as published from time to time by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) in Section 6932 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations or any successor provision published pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 50093(c). If there is a discrepancy between applicable HUD and HCD AMI levels, then the HCD AMI will be applied, unless otherwise required by mandatory requirements of applicable federal law.

1.6. “CEQA” means the California Environmental Quality Act and any state and local rules, regulations or guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.

1.7. “City” means the City of Thousand Oaks, California.

1.8. “Development Agreement Ordinance” means Title 9, Chapter 11 of the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code wherein City has set forth the procedures and requirements for consideration and administration of development agreements.

1.9. “Development Fees” means any monetary fee or exaction other than a tax or special assessment that would be charged by a local government agency pursuant to Government Code Section 66000, et seq., to a project applicant in connection with new development for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the new development, including without limitation, fees for utility construction, use, linkage or connection fees; public transit; traffic improvement and operations and any other traffic-related fees; affordable housing; sustainability or green initiatives; capital facilities; police and fire; parks; libraries; and other exactions, assessments, fair share charges or other similar impact fees or charges imposed on and in connection with new development.

1.10. “Future Development Entitlements” means all necessary City discretionary approvals (including conditions of approval) for the development of the Project that are not addressed in this Agreement and that must be consistent with the current General Plan and Zone Change Ordinance for the Project Site, the Applicable Laws, and this Agreement.

1.11. “General Plan” means the General Plan of the City.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

1.12. “Measure E Residential Capacity” means the citywide residential units available for reallocation to a proposed development project pursuant to Section 9-

2.203 of City’s Municipal Code.

1.13. “Ministerial Approvals” means the non-discretionary City permits and approvals necessary for the development of the proposed Project as required by the Applicable Laws or State law, including but not limited to approval of building plans, final map, building permits, occupancy permits, and other similar types of permits necessary to implement the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Ministerial Approvals may be processed and approved in accordance with amended versions of the Applicable Laws upon Owner’s request and in Owner’s sole discretion.

1.14. “Moderate Income Households” means a household with income that does not exceed the greater of (i) 120 percent of the Area Median Income, as adjusted by Actual Household Size, or (ii) the then current income range limit for Moderate Income Households established for Ventura County under Section 6932 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations as in effect at the time the household submits its application for occupancy of the Moderate Income rental Unit, as such limit is adjusted by Actual Household Size. Refer to the 2022 Ventura County Income Limits chart attached hereto as Exhibit E and future amendments and revisions thereto.

1.15. “Owner” or “Developer” means LATIGO HILLCREST, LLC, and each and all of their respective transferees, partners, successors, and assigns, whether voluntary or involuntary.

1.16. “Processing Fees” means fees and charges (i) adopted by the City for the purpose of defraying the City’s reasonable costs incurred or to be incurred in the processing and administration of any form of permit, license, or land use entitlements, or (ii) imposed by the City to defray the costs of periodically updating its plans, policies, and procedures, including but not limited to, the fees and charges referred to in Government Code Section 66014.

1.17. “Project” means the proposed development of the Property in accordance with the Project Approvals, this Agreement, and the conditions of approval and mitigation measures adopted as part of this Agreement.

1.18. “Project Approvals” means those discretionary City permits and approvals, including those listed in Recital H of this Agreement (including conditions of approval), necessary for the development of the proposed Project consistent with the needed General Plan amendment and Zone Change for the Project Site, the TOMC and other Applicable Laws in effect on the Agreement Effective Date, any amendment to such permit or approval allowed by the TOMC and this Agreement.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

1.19. “Property” is that certain real property located within the City of Thousand Oaks at 2150 W Hillcrest Drive, Thousand Oaks, California 91320, A.P.N 667- 0-113-075 and as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The Property may also be referred to from time to time herein as the “Project Site.”

1.20. “Reserved Powers” means the rights and authority expected from this Agreement’s restriction on the City’s police powers and which are instead reserved to the City. The Reserved Powers include (a) the powers to enact regulations or take future Discretionary Actions after the approval of the Project Approvals that may be in conflict with the Applicable Rules and Project Approvals, but (i) are necessary to protect the public health and safety, and are generally applicable on a citywide basis (except in the event of natural disasters as found by City Council such as floods, earthquakes, pandemics and similar acts of God), (ii) are necessary to comply with State or federal laws and regulations (whether enacted previous or subsequent to the final administrative approval of the Project Approvals), or (iii) constitute Processing Fees and charges imposed or required by the City to cover its actual costs in processing applications, permit requests and approvals of the Project or in monitoring compliance with permits issued or approvals granted for the performance of any conditions imposed on the Project, unless otherwise waived in writing by the City, and (b) the power to enact and amend the Building Codes.

1.21. “Term” means the period of time for which this Agreement shall be effective in accordance with Section 3 below.

1.22. “Very Low Income Households” means a household with income that does not exceed the greater of (i) 50 percent of the Area Median Income, as adjusted by Actual Household Size, or (ii) the then current income range limit for Very Low Income Households established for Ventura County under Section 6932 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations as in effect at the time the household submits its application for occupancy of the Very Low Income Rental Unit, as such limit is adjusted by Actual Household Size.

2. Exhibits. The following documents are referred to in this Agreement, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference.

Exhibits Designation Description
A Legal Description of Property
B Site Plan
C Project Plan Set dated May 26, 2023
D Conditions of Approval
E Ventura County Income Limits Chart
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

3. Agreement Effective Date and Term. This Agreement shall become effective (“Agreement Effective Date”) as set forth in Subsection 1.3 above. Unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties, this Agreement shall expire and be of no further force or effect on the earlier of seven (7) years from the Agreement Effective Date (“Term”) or the date on which the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy or approves final permits to allow occupancy of buildings for the Project. The term may be terminated, modified, or extended by mutual consent in writing of the Parties with good cause, not to be unreasonably withheld by the City. Owner intends to submit plans for building permits within the first year of the Term, subject to unforeseen delays and the Parties will act in good faith to move the project forward through construction and completion in a time efficient manner. Notwithstanding the Owner’s intent, Owner shall submit plans for building permits within two years of the Effective Date. Following the expiration of the Term, this Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force and effect, except with respect to terms and provisions that expressly survive the termination of this Agreement.

If this Agreement is terminated because the City has issued a Certificate of Occupancy or otherwise issued final occupancy permits for the entire Project, then Owner’s obligations to make any Public Benefit Payments or provide the Public Benefits as identified in Section 6.1, below, shall survive such termination until the obligation has been completely satisfied. In the event the Project Approvals are challenged, the Term is tolled through the duration of the litigation. All Project Approval expiration dates will extend through the term of the Agreement.

4. State Enabling Statute. To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted the Development Agreement Act which authorizes any city to enter into binding development agreements establishing certain development rights in real property with persons having legal or equitable interest in such property. Section 65864 of the Development Agreement Act expressly provides as follows:
“The Legislature finds and declares that:
(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development to the consumer, and
discourage investment in and a commitment to
comprehensive planning which would make maximum
efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
(b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules, and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic cost of development.”
Notwithstanding the foregoing, to ensure that the City remains responsive and accountable to its residents while pursuing the benefits of development agreements contemplated by the Legislature, the City: (1) accepts restraints on its police powers contained in development agreements only to the extent and for the duration required to achieve the mutual objectives of the Parties as permitted hereunder; and (2) to offset controls and conditions imposed on development project applications.

5. Purpose of this Agreement.

5.1. General Acknowledgement. This Agreement is entered into for the purpose of permitting the development of the Property in a manner that will assure certain anticipated benefits to both City and Owner as set forth in this Agreement.

5.2. Developer Objectives. In accordance with the legislative findings set forth in the Development Agreement Act, and with full recognition of the City’s policy of judicious restraints on its police powers, Developer wishes to obtain reasonable assurance that the Project may be developed in accordance with the Applicable Rules, the Project Approvals, and other Discretionary Actions and with the terms of this Agreement, but subject to the City’s Reserved Powers. In the absence of this Agreement, Developer would have no assurance that it can complete the Project with the zoning, and proposed density for the development (including, without limitation, the location and number of improvements, proposed height and building limits (e.g., requested density, maximum floor area, etc.) and the provisions of open space, vehicular access, and parking set forth in this Agreement, the Project Approvals, and other Discretionary Actions. This Agreement, therefore, is necessary to assure Developer that, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, the Project will not be (a) reduced or otherwise modified in density, intensity or use from what is set forth in the Project Approvals and other Discretionary Actions, (b) “subjected to new rules, regulations, ordinances or official policies or plans that are not adopted or approved pursuant to the City’s Reserved Powers or (c) subjected to unreasonable delays for reasons other than Citywide health and safety enactments related to force majeure events such as, but not limited to, floods, earthquakes, pandemics, labor shortages and similar acts of God.

5.3. Mutual Objectives. Development of the Project in accordance with this Agreement will provide for the orderly development of the Property in accordance with the policies and objectives set forth in the General Plan, as amended by the General Plan Amendment. Moreover, this Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning for and securing orderly development of the Property, assure installation of necessary improvements for, and other features of, the Project reflected in the Project Approvals, assure attainment of maximum efficient resource utilization within the City at the least economic cost to its citizens and otherwise achieve the goals and purposes for which they Development Agreement Act was enacted. The Parties believe that such orderly Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

development of the Project will provide public benefits to the City through the imposition of development standards and requirements under this Agreement, including without limitation increased tax revenues, installation of onsite improvements, creation and retention of jobs, and the development of an aesthetically attractive Project, as well as the public benefits described in Section 6.1, below. In addition, although development of the Project in accordance with this Agreement will restrain the City’s land use or other relevant police powers, this Agreement provides the City with sufficient reserved powers during the Term hereof to remain responsible and accountable to its residents. In exchange for these and other benefits to the City, Developer will receive assurance that the Project may be developed during the Term of this Agreement in accordance with the Applicable Rules, Project Approvals and other Discretionary Actions, and the Reserved Powers, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

5.4. Applicability of the Agreement. This Agreement does not (a) grant height, density or intensity in excess of that otherwise established in the Applicable Rules and the Project Approvals; (b) eliminate future Discretionary Actions relating to the Project if applications requiring such Discretionary Action are initiated and submitted by the Owner of the Property after the Effective Date of this Agreement; (c) guarantee that Developer will receive any profits from the Project; (d) prohibit the Project’s participation in any benefit assessment district that is generally applicable to surrounding properties; (e) amend the General Plan; or, (f) amend the City’s Planning and Zoning Code (Title 9).

This Agreement has a fixed Term. Furthermore, in any subsequent Discretionary Actions applicable to the Property, the City may apply such new rules, regulations and official policies as are contained in its Reserved Powers.

6. Public Benefits. This Agreement provides assurances that the public benefits identified in Section 6.1, below, will be achieved in accordance with the Applicable Rules and Project Approvals and with the terms of this Agreement and subject to the City’s Reserved Powers.

6.1. Benefits to City and Obligations of Owner. The benefits to City (including, without limitation, the residents of City) and obligations of Owner under this Agreement include, but are not limited to:

6.1.1. Construction of the Project in a single phase which increases residential stock in the City by adding 300 market-rate apartments in a mixture of onebedroom, one bedroom with a den, two bedroom, and three bedroom units;

6.1.2. Owner is pursuing a 35% density bonus pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law. To qualify for this percentage of additional market-rate units, Owner is going to construct and preserve 11% (28 units) of the base 246 units as Very Low Income Household. Two additional Very Low Income Household units are provided in exchange for certain modifications to the Objective Design Standards. The thirty (30) affordable Very Low-Income Households apartment units are made up of 17 onebedroom units, 11 two-bedroom units, and 2 three-bedroom units. All affordable units Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

will be protected by a recorded covenant to maintain the units in the relevant income range for fifty-five (55) years;

6.1.3. Three Moderate Income Household Affordable units are provided in exchange for modifications to the Objective Design Standards. The three Moderate Income Household units will be made up of 2, one-bedroom units, and 1, twobedroom unit. All affordable units will be protected by a recorded covenant to maintain the units in the relevant income range for fifty-five (55) years;

6.1.4. Removal of vacant commercial use and structures, and replacement with mixed-use residential and commercial uses and structures;

6.1.5. Two (2) live/work units which results in the Project providing vehicular trip reduction benefits as a result of the dedication of live/work units and work share space for use by the residents of Latigo Hillcrest. In addition, onsite retail and restaurants will also result in fewer vehicles miles traveled thereby reducing air, noise, and traffic impacts on the community at-large;

6.1.6. Construction of 5,300 square feet of Commercial retail space with 3,000 square feet of public exterior commercial plaza;

6.1.7. Approximately 1,050 square feet of work/share space;

6.1.8. Enhanced architectural design with appropriate massing and scale, extensive articulation, glazing, and extensive detailing with upgraded materials;

6.1.9. Provision of necessary fees, dedications and public improvements that will provide benefits for the community;

6.1.10. Integrate sustainable features including but not limited to electric-only residential utilities, rooftop solar farm (as required by state law), electric bicycle stations, and EV charging stations including the following:

6.1.10.1 226 EV Capable parking spaces (40% of overall
Parking) with pre-wiring installed for future Level 2 EV Charging;

6.1.10.2 174 EV Ready parking spaces (30% of parking)
that equates to 5% more than required by Cal Green) and which are equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging 120-240 volt 30 Amp receptacles;

6.1.10.3 57 EV Chargers (10% of overall Parking)
equipped with Level 2 EVSE Supply Equipment installed and operational prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy;
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

6.1.10.4 Indoor/Outdoor bike parking with electric bicycle and scooter charging stations;

6.1.11. In lieu of providing public art on the site, Owner will modify or replace the gateway sign currently installed on Rancho Conejo Boulevard west of the Property with a new gateway sign adjacent to Rancho Conejo Boulevard. The Parties agree to use good faith efforts to design and construct the gateway sign as outlined in the Conditions of Approval.

6.2. Benefits to Owner and Obligations of City. Owner will expend time and money in constructing public improvements and facilities in connection with the Project, and thus the vested rights provided by this Agreement will be of considerable benefit to Owner. The benefits to Owner and obligations of City also include the following:

6.2.1. City’s adoption of a General Plan amendment that provides residential units on the property in conjunction with a mixed-use project that also provides an affordable housing component that is necessary for the proposed number of residential units, which significantly enhances the value of the Property;

6.2.2. City’s allocation of 246 Measure E residential units for the Project;

6.2.3. City’s adoption of a General Plan amendment that provides for commercial/retail uses as detailed in the attached exhibits;

6.2.4. Approval of a Specific Plan No. 24 that provides unique elements to the building facades, and permits the overall composition, standards, and placement of buildings within the plan;

6.2.5. As more fully set forth in the Conditions of Approval, some specific waivers of the City’s objective standards pertaining to architectural design and construction materials;

6.2.6. Consistent with California Government Code Section 65915, the City’s approval of 87 “density bonus” market rate units above and beyond the 246 base density units permitted by the General Plan’s 30 dwelling units per acre limitation;

6.2.7. City’s guarantee that certain City fees related to development of the Property will not increase during the term of this Agreement;

6.2.8. City’s agreement to allow Owner to file all applications for City entitlements and any required maps in a single process not restricted as to the time of filing, but not later than the expiration of this Agreement; Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

6.2.9. City’s agreement to not change the existing zoning and General Plan designations of the Property without Owner’s consent during the term of this Agreement;

6.2.10. City’s assurance that any permits for the Project as described herein for which owner has submitted plans entitled “Project Plans” (attached as Exhibit “C”) will be processed expeditiously and in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the approved Project Plans, and the Conditions of Approval (attached as Exhibit “D”).

7. Project Development

7.1. Project Description and Binding Covenants. The Property is that property described in the attached Exhibits A and B which include a map showing its location and boundaries. The Property is commonly described as located at 2150 West Hillcrest Drive, Thousand Oaks, California, A.P.N. 667-0-113-075. Owner represents that it has a legal or equitable interest in the Property and that all other persons holding legal or equitable interests in the Property (excepting owners or claimants in easements) agree to be bound by this Agreement. The Parties intend and determine that the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants which shall run with said Property, and the burdens and benefits hereof shall bind and inure to all successors in interest to the Parties hereto.

7.2. General Development. Any development of the Project on the Property shall be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and attached exhibits.

7.3. Ministerial Approvals. City hereby agrees that Ministerial Approvals for the Project will be approved in a manner consistent with the Project Approvals and Applicable Laws, provided that Owner satisfactorily complies with all preliminary procedures, actions, payments, criteria, and regulations applicable as of the Agreement Effective Date and generally required of developers by City for processing applications for developments at such time.

7.4. CEQA Compliance. The City Council approved the current General Plan Land Use Element designation and zoning for the Property after considering the information and findings of the Environmental Checklist for this Project and EIR No. 2022- 70774. The Project is subject to all applicable mitigation measures and project design features as described in EIR No. 2022-70774.

7.5. Permitted Uses and Development Standards. In accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Developer shall have a vested right to develop the Property for the uses and in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Future Development Entitlements (if and when approved), Ministerial Approvals (if and when approved), any Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

amendments to the foregoing approved by the City, and, to the extent not addressed in the foregoing, the Applicable Laws, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and any amendments to the Project Approvals or Agreement as may, from time to time, be approved pursuant to this Agreement.

7.6. Owner to Build Approved Project. Owner hereby agrees that development of the Project shall be in accordance with the Project Approvals, including the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures and project design features for the Project as adopted by City, any amendments to the Project Approvals or Agreement as may, from time to time, be approved pursuant to this Agreement, the Future Development Entitlements (if and when approved), Ministerial Approvals (if and when approved), any amendments to the foregoing approved by the City, and, to the extent not addressed in the foregoing, the Applicable Laws. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to restrict the ability to make minor changes and adjustments in accordance with Subsection 10.2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall require Owner to construct the Project or pay fees for any portion of the Project that Owner does not construct.

7.7. Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any future City action that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

The Project shall be completed within the Term unless extended pursuant to this Agreement. Owner intends to submit plans for building permits within the first year of the Term, subject to unforeseen delays.

8. Rules, Regulations, and Fees.

8.1. Main Rules, Regulations, Ordinances and Policies. For the Term of this Agreement, the rules, regulations, ordinances and official policies governing the permitted uses of land, the density and intensity of use, phasing, design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property, including the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, shall be the Applicable Laws, the Project Approvals, Conditions of Approval (Exhibit D), the Future Development Entitlements (if and when approved), Ministerial Approvals (if and when approved), any amendments to the foregoing approved by the City, and Project Plan Set dated May 26, 2023 (Exhibit C). Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, to the extent any future changes in the General Plan, zoning codes or any future rules, Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

ordinances, regulations, or policies adopted by the City purport to be applicable to the Property but are inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail, unless the Parties mutually agree to amend or modify this Agreement.

8.2. Changes in State and Federal Rules and Regulations. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the application to the development of the Property of changes in City’s laws, regulations, plans, or policies, the terms of which are specifically mandated and required by changes in state and federal laws or regulations as provided in Government Code Section 65869.5. This includes, but is not limited to, the California Building Code, California Fire Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Residential Code, California Green Building Standards Code, and California Energy Code all of which have also been adopted in the TOMC. In the event State or federal laws or regulations enacted after the Agreement Date prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement or require changes in plans maps or permits approved by the City, this Agreement, or portions thereof, may be modified, extended, or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or federal laws or regulations or the regulations of such other governmental jurisdiction.

8.3. No City Liability for Federal or State Actions Affecting Project. To the extent that any actions of federal or state agencies (or actions of regional and local agencies, including City, insofar as they are required by said federal or state agencies) have the effect of preventing, delaying, or modifying development of the Property, City shall not in any manner be liable for any such prevention, delay, or modification of said development or for costs incurred by Developer in complying with such actions. To the extent possible, in the event of any ambiguity, any such regulations shall be applied and construed so as to provide the Owner with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement.

8.4. Development Impact Fees and Public Benefit Program Cash Contribution. All City Processing Fees and Development Fees Owner shall pay for the Project shall be at the rates in effect on the Agreement Effective Date. Fees payable directly to, or collected by City for payment on behalf of, other public agencies, including but not limited to the State of California, County of Ventura, Ventura County Watershed Protection District, Calleguas Municipal Water District, Cal-Am, Conejo Recreation and Park District, and Conejo Valley Unified School District, are not subject to the limitation set forth herein. Any fees, charges, taxes, assessments, or levies (including, but not limited to, those for water and wastewater usage, and landscape and lighting assessments) other than Processing Fees and Development Fees that are revised or adopted on a Citywide or regional or communitywide basis during the term of this Agreement shall apply to the Property. Owner shall be entitled to fee credits where Owner demonstrates credits should be applied.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

Per California Government Code Section 65915 and Section 65915.1, affordable housing impact fees, including inclusionary zoning fees and in-lieu fees, shall not be imposed on Project's affordable units.

8.5. Health and Safety Exception. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the authority of City to adopt and apply codes, ordinances and regulations which have the legal effect of protecting persons or property from conditions which create a serious and imminent health, safety, or physical risk. To the extent possible, any such codes, ordinances, and regulations shall be applied and construed so as to provide the Owner with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement.

8.6. Uniform Codes Applicable. All project construction, grading, and building plans for the Project shall comply with the uniform codes, construction standards and specifications in effect at the time the construction and improvements plans are approved, including those standards and specifications set forth in the California Building Code, California Fire Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Residential Code, California Green Building Standards Code, and California Energy Code all of which have also been adopted in the TOMC.

8.7. Future Development Entitlements. City agrees to cooperate with Owner to facilitate the processing of and to expeditiously process all Future Development Entitlements and City shall exercise its discretion in a manner consistent with and in recognition of this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Applicable Laws, and other approved documents associated with this Agreement. City and Owner shall meet to identify all necessary Future Development Entitlements and to develop a schedule processing them. City and Owner agree to cooperatively work together to ensure expeditious review and processing and assign a dedicated City planner of the Future Development Entitlements.

8.8. Reserved Discretionary Approvals. Development Permit (DP) 2022- 70773 and other land use entitlements identified in Exhibit H have been approved and adopted for the development of the Project on the Subject Property. Owner will first need to obtain a building permit(s) and other future discretionary approvals to complete construction and development of the Project on the Subject property as described in the exhibits attached to this Agreement. City agrees to cooperate with Owner to facilitate the processing of and to expeditiously process all future applications for such reserved discretionary approvals and City shall exercise its discretion in a manner consistent with and in recognition of this Agreement and other approved documents associated with this Agreement.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

8.9. Governing Rules, Regulations, Ordinances, Conditions, and Policies. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, for the term of this Agreement, the rules, regulations, ordinances and official policies governing the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use, design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property, including the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, shall be those rules, regulations and official policies in force on the effective date the City Council approves this Agreement, including the Conditions of Approval and Exhibits labeled “Project Plans” dated May 26, 2023, and attached as Exhibit “C”. To the extent any future changes in the General Plan, zoning codes or any future rules, ordinances, regulations or policies adopted by the City purport to be applicable to the Property but are inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail, unless the Parties mutually agree to amend or modify this Agreement. To the extent that any future changes in the General Plan, zoning codes or any future rules, ordinances, regulations, or policies adopted by the City are applicable to the Property and are not inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement or are otherwise made applicable by other provisions of this Agreement, such future changes in the General Plan, zoning codes or such future rules, ordinances, regulations or policies shall be applicable to the Property.

8.10. Applicable City Construction Standards. All project construction and improvement plans for the Project shall comply with the applicable governmental rules, regulations, and design guidelines in effect at the time the Project Plans are approved.

If no permit is required for the public improvements, the date of permit approval shall be the date the improvement plans are approved by the City or the date construction for the public improvements is commenced, whichever occurs first.

8.11. Uniform Codes Applicable. This Project shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of all applicable California Building Codes and local amendments, in effect at the time of submittal of the appropriate building, grading, encroachment or other construction permits for the Project. The Project must be built consistently with the City’s General Plan, Thousand Oaks Municipal Code, and Specific Plan No. 24. If no permits are required for any infrastructure improvements, such improvements will be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the codes delineated herein in effect at the start of construction of such infrastructure.

9. Relationship of Parties. The contractual relationship between City and Owner is independent and under no circumstances shall Owner be considered an agent or partner of City.

10. Amendments to Agreement. This Agreement may be amended in whole or in part only in writing and only by the mutual consent of the Parties. Amendments shall be processed either as Major Amendments or Minor Amendments, as defined and set forth below in Subsections 10.1 and 10.2.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

10.1. Major Amendments. Amendments to this Agreement which affect or relate to (a) the Term of this Agreement; (b) the permitted uses of the Property; (c) the provisions for the reservation or dedication of land; (d) an increase in the density or intensity of use of the Property or the maximum height or maximum gross square footage; (e) changes to the percentage of commercial uses to residential use; (f) changes to the community benefits affecting the total monetary contributions by Developer; (g) changes to building materials which are not comparable or better than those included in the project plans dated May 26, 2023; or, (h) changes to the features of the conceptual landscape plan, including common outdoor spaces which are to comparable or better than the details included in the Specific Plan dated May 25, 2023, shall be deemed a “Major Amendment” and shall require giving of notice and a public hearing before the Planning Commission and the City Council in accordance with Government Code Section 65868 and TOMC Section 9-11.14(a). Any amendment which is not a Major Amendment shall be deemed a Minor Amendment subject to Subsection 10.2 below. Consistent with Sections 10.1 and 10.2, the City Manager or his or her designee shall have the discretionary authority to determine if any amendment is a Major Amendment subject to this Section or a Minor Amendment subject to Subsection 10.2 below. Said determination may be appealed to the City Council.

10.2. Minor Amendments. The Parties acknowledge that refinement and further implementation of the Project may demonstrate that certain minor changes may be appropriate with respect to the details of the development and performance of the Parties under this Agreement, Minor changes include any modification to the Project that is substantially consistent with the intent of the Project Approvals and does not involve any deviation from Specific Plan No. 24 or Applicable Laws. The Parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect to the details of the Project and with respect to those items covered in the general terms of this Agreement. If and when the Parties find that clarifications, minor changes, or minor adjustments are necessary or appropriate and do not constitute a Major Amendment under Subsection 10.1, they shall effectuate such clarifications, minor changes or minor adjustments through a written Minor Amendment approved in writing by Owner and the City Manager. Minor amendments authorized by this subsection are ministerial and may not constitute a discretionary action or “amendment” for the purposes of Government Code Sections 65867, 65867.5, and 65868. Unless otherwise required by law, no such Minor Amendment shall require prior notice or hearing.

11. Cancellation and Termination. This Agreement may be canceled, in whole or in part, by mutual consent of the Parties in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 65868 and TOMC Section 9-11.14. Any termination under Government Code Section 65865.1 or TOMC Section 9-11.14(b) shall be effective only if Owner is provided no less than thirty (30) days in which to cure any alleged noncompliance, provided that City shall not terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 65865.1 or Section 9-11.14(b) if City determines that the nature of the noncompliance requires more than thirty (30) days to cure and that Owner is capable of effecting such cure, and within such thirty (30) days Owner commences such cure and thereafter diligently and with Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

continuity prosecutes such cure to completion. Any termination of this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1 or TOMC Section 9-11.14(b) shall be preceded by an opportunity for Owner to be heard before the City Council. This provision shall not limit City’s or Owner’s remedies as provided in this Agreement.

12. Enforcement. Unless canceled or terminated as provided herein, this Agreement is enforceable by City, Owner, or any successor in interest, notwithstanding any change in any applicable General or specific plan, zoning, or subdivision regulation adopted by City or otherwise imposed which alters or amends the rules, regulations or policies specified in this Agreement.

13. Periodic Review of Compliance with Agreement.

13.1. Periodic Review. City may review compliance with this Agreement every twelve (12) months from the date this Agreement is executed unless a shorter time is specified by the City Council. City shall notify Owner in writing of the date for review at least thirty (30) days prior thereto, and Owner shall provide such information as City may require so City may properly perform the review. The City shall conduct any such annual review to determine whether Developer is acting in good-faith compliance with the provisions of this Agreement in accordance with Section 65865.1 of the California Government Code. Developer shall reimburse the City for the cost of each annual review conducted during the term of this Agreement. Such cost reimbursement shall include all direct and indirect expenses actually incurred in such annual reviews, provided that such cost shall be generally consistent with the cost charged for annual reviews for other development agreements to which the City is a party.

13.2. Good Faith Compliance. During each periodic review, Owner shall be required, in accordance with TOMC Section 9-11.13, to demonstrate by substantial evidence good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

14. Events of Default.

14.1. Defaults by Owner. If City determines that Owner is in default under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, City shall, by written notice to Owner, specify the manner in which Owner is in default and state the steps Owner must take to comply.

If, within thirty (30) days after the effective date of notice from City specifying the manner in which Owner has failed to so comply, Owner does not commence all steps reasonably necessary to comply as required and/or thereafter diligently and with continuity pursue such steps to cure the default, then Owner shall be deemed to be in default under the terms of this Agreement and City may seek to terminate this Agreement providing Owner an opportunity to be heard before the City Council in accordance with Government Code Section 65865.1 and TOMC Section 9-11.14(b), or seek other remedies as set forth in this Agreement.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

14.2. Defaults by City. If Owner determines that City is in default under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Owner shall, by written notice to City, specify the manner in which City is in default and state the steps City must take to comply. If, within thirty (30) days after the effective date of notice from Owner specifying the manner necessary to comply as required and/or thereafter diligently and with continuity pursue such steps to completion, then City shall be deemed to be in default under the terms of this Agreement and Owner may terminate this Agreement or seek other remedies as set forth in this Agreement.

14.3. Failure to Cure Default Procedures. If after the cure period has elapsed, the City finds and determines that Owner remains in default, the City shall make a report to the City Council and then set a public hearing in accordance with the notice and hearing requirements of Government Code Section 65867 and 65868. If, after public hearing, the City Council finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence that the Owner has not cured the applicable default pursuant to this Section, City Council may terminate the Agreement and seek all remedies as set forth in this Agreement.

14.4. No Monetary Damages. It is acknowledged by the Parties that neither the City nor Owner would have entered into this Agreement if it were liable in monetary damages under or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof.

The Parties agree and recognize that, as a practical matter, it may not be possible to determine an amount of monetary damages that would adequately compensate Owner for its investment of time and financial resources in planning to arrive at the kind, location, intensity of use, and improvements for the Project, nor to calculate the consideration the City would require to enter into this Agreement to justify the exposure. Therefore, the Parties agree that each of the Parties may pursue any remedy at law or equity available for any breach of any provision of this Agreement, except that neither Party nor any Transferee shall be liable in monetary damages and the Parties covenant not to sue for or claim any monetary damages for the breach of any provision of this Agreement. The Parties understand and agree, however, that nothing in this Section 14.4 shall prohibit, restrict, or otherwise affect the rights of a Party to seek monetary damages as a result of Owner's failure to make the required Benefit Payments or pay to the City any other required payments under this Agreement. If Owner fails to make the Public Benefit Payments as required by this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to sue for the City's actual, direct monetary damages in the amount of such unpaid Benefit Payments. In no event shall either Party be entitled to special, consequential, or punitive damages or damages measured by lost profits.

14.5. Remedies. The exclusive remedy for Owner for a default by City shall be specific performance under the terms of this Agreement to construct the Project as described within this Agreement. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Owner shall not assert, and hereby waives, any claim against City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents, on any theory of liability, for special, indirect, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of, in connection with, or as a result of, this Agreement and any actions by City to approve the Project and this Agreement. Owner further waives any Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

right to monetary damages such as compensatory damages, loss of economic benefit, or lost profits.

14.6. Commencement of Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may initiate legal action to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to enforce any covenants or agreements herein, to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, to recover damages or any default, or to obtain any other remedies consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Venue for such action shall be in Ventura County.

15. Waivers and Delay.

15.1. Waiver. Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, and failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon a default by the other Party hereto, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party’s right to demand strict compliance by such other Party in the future.

15.2. Third Parties. Non-performance shall not be excused because of a failure of a third person, except as provided in Subsection 15.4.

15.3. Covenant Not to Sue. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Developer hereby agrees that neither Developer nor any of its agents, employees, representatives, members, managers, officers, assigns, heirs and successors in interest shall commence, prosecute, assist, promote or encourage, financially or otherwise, either individually or in any collective way, either directly or indirectly, either on its own behalf or on behalf of any other person or entity, any arbitration, litigation or any other judicial proceeding of any kind, nature or description against or involving the City challenging that any applicable conditions, mitigation measures, obligations, requirements or restrictions contained in the Agreement violate any California statutory requirements, constitute an abuse of the police power, violate substantive due process, deny equal protection of the laws, constitute or result in a taking of property without payment of just compensation, or impose an unlawful fee, or exaction or tax. Nothing in this Section shall prevent Developer from exercising its rights under Section 14, above, with respect to a default by the City.

15.4. Force Majeure. The Parties shall not be deemed to be in default of any provision of this Agreement where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, pandemic, states of emergency, stay-at-home orders, strikes and other labor difficulties, or similar events and occurrences beyond the Parties’ control. If any such events shall occur, the terms of this Agreement and the time for performance by a Party of any of its obligations hereunder shall be extended by the period of time that such events prevented performance of the obligation. To assist the Parties in determining the period of time for excusable delay, the Parties may refer to federal, State, and local orders, including health orders, adopted by any of the various Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

agencies that directly impact this Project and the Parties’ ability to either work on the Project or process permits.

15.5. Nexus/Reasonable Relationship Challenges. Notwithstanding Subsection 15.1, Owner consents to, and waives any rights it may have now or in the future to bring a nexus/reasonable relationship challenge relating to the legal validity of (1) the express conditions, requirements, policies, rules, regulations or programs required by City’s Applicable Laws, including City’s General Plan, TOMC, Subdivision Map Act regulations, Specific Plan No. 24, Residential Planned Development rules and regulations, and Oak/Landmark Tree Preservation rules and regulations as they exist on the Agreement Date as to the Project; or (2) this Agreement, including without limitation, any claim that the Agreement constitutes an abuse of the police power, violates substantive due process, denies equal protection of the laws, constitutes or results in a taking of property without payment of just compensation, or imposes an unlawful fee, exaction, or tax.

15.6. Cooperation by Owner. Owner will, in a timely manner, provide City with all documents, applications, plans, and other information necessary for City to carry out its obligations hereunder, and cause Owner’s planners, engineers, and all other consultants to submit in a timely manner all required materials and documents, therefore.

Owner shall also apply in a timely manner for such other permits and approvals from other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Property as may be required for the development of the Project.

16. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and email.

Notices required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:

City of Thousand Oaks
2100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks, California 91362
Attention: Community Development Director
Email: [email protected]
Notices required to be given to Owner shall be addressed as follows:

Latigo-Hillcrest, LLC
11845 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 515W
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Attn: Mark Maron, Co-Founder and Managing Partner
Email: [email protected]
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

With a copy to:

Thomas S. Cohen, Esq.

Cohen Land Use Law, LLP
1534 N. Moorpark Road, #337
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
Email: [email protected]
Formal written notices, demands, correspondence and communications between City and Owner shall be sufficiently given if dispatched by certified mail, postage prepaid, to the principal office of City and Owner, as set forth in this Section. Owner shall give written notice to City, at least thirty (30) days prior to the close of escrow, of any sale or transfer of any portion of the Property and any assignment of this Agreement, specifying the name or names of the transferee, the transferee’s mailing address, the acreage and location of the land sold or transferred, and the name and address of a single person or entity to whom any notice relating to this Agreement shall be given, and any other information reasonably necessary for City to consider approval of an assignment pursuant to Section 18 or any other action City is required to take under this Agreement.

Any notice given as required, herein, shall be deemed given a seventy-two (72) hour notification after deposit in the United States mail, if sent by mail, or upon delivery if personally delivered. A Party may change its address for notices by giving notice in writing to the other Party as required, herein, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

17. Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge.

17.1. Challenges to Agreement. In the event of any legal action instituted by a third party, including but not limited to any other governmental entity or official, challenging the validity of any provision of this Agreement, City and Owner hereby agree to use reasonable efforts to cooperate in defending such action. Each Party shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees in defending any such third-party challenge to the Agreement, except that the Parties may by mutual written consent agree to joint legal representation in any such suit, the cost of which shall be equally shared between City and Owner. In the event of any litigation challenging this Agreement, or any portion hereof, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect while such litigation, including any appellate review, is pending.

17.2. Challenges to Entitlements. In the event of any administrative, legal, or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any person or entity not a party to the Agreement challenging any entitlement issued in reliance upon City approvals or challenging the sufficiency of any environmental review of this Project (each an “Entitlement Challenge”), each Party must cooperate in the defense of such Entitlement Challenge, in accordance with this Section. Owner agrees to pay City’s costs of defending an Entitlement Challenge, including all court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by City in defense of any Entitlement Challenge, as well as the time of the Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

City’s staff spent in connection with such defense, and any costs and attorneys’ fees awarded against the City to a successful third party. Owner may select its own legal counsel to represent Owner’s interests in any Entitlement Challenge at Owner’s sole cost and expense. City agrees that it will not enter into a settlement agreement to any Entitlement Challenge without Owner’s written consent. Owner’s obligation to pay City’s costs in the defense of an Entitlement Challenge does not extend to those costs incurred on appeal filed by City as against a successful third party unless otherwise authorized by Owner in writing.

17.3. City’s Right to Independent Legal Evaluation. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as preventing City from independently evaluating its rights, obligations and causes of action in the event of litigation.

17.4. Cooperation. The City shall cooperate with Developer in the defense of the Proceeding; provided, however, that such obligation of the City to cooperate in its defense shall not require the City to (a) assert a position in its defense of the Proceeding which it has determined, in its sole discretion, has no substantial merit, (b) advocate in its defense of the Proceeding legal theories which it has determined, in its sole discretion, lack substantial merit, or (c) advocate in its defense of the Proceeding legal theories which it has determined, in its sole discretion, are contrary to its best interests, or to public policy.

Nothing contained in this Section 17.4 shall require Developer to refrain from asserting in its defense of the Proceeding positions or legal theories that do not satisfy the foregoing requirements.

17.5. Defending The Proceeding. Developer shall have the right, but not the obligation, to timely retain legal counsel to defend against any Proceeding, including without limitation a lawsuit to challenge a Project Approval or this Agreement based on an alleged violation of CEQA. The City shall have the right, if it so chooses, to defend any Proceeding utilizing in-house legal staff, or to retain outside legal counsel. Whether the City utilizes in-house legal staff, or outside legal counsel, Developer shall be liable for all legal costs, fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the City in defending a Proceeding. Provided that Developer is not in breach of the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not enter into any settlement of a Proceeding that involves the modification of any Project Approval or otherwise results in Developer incurring liabilities or other obligations, without the prior written consent of Developer.

18. Transfers and Assigns.

18.1. Transfers in General. Owner shall have the right to sell, assign or transfer (collectively “transfer”) this Agreement, and any and all of its rights, duties and obligations hereunder, to any person or entity at any time during the term of this Agreement, provided, however, in no event shall the rights, duties and obligations conferred upon Owner pursuant to this Agreement be at any time so transferred to or assigned except through a transfer of Owner's interest in the Property or a portion thereof.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

18.2. City Review of Proposed Transfer. Prior to any such proposed transfer, Owner shall provide a Notice of Transfer to City, including the name, net worth, and development experience of the transferee. Any such transfer to an entity whose development experience confirms the transferee's ability to develop a project comparable in size and complexity to the Project shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Unless agreed to in writing, if Owner transfers the rights under the Agreement before the Project is completely constructed, the subsequent Owner will be required to build or complete the construction of the Project based on the architectural plans approved by City and under the same entitlement conditions previously approved, subject to any changes proposed consistent with subsections 10.1 and 10.2 above. The Director may require the submittal of reasonable documentation regarding the information provided relative to the proposed transferee. Any proposed transferee shall provide City all documents within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the Director’s request that support a finding transferee has the requisite experience and the financial stability to develop the Project or respective portion thereof. The Community Development Director may withhold approval of such transfer only if the proposed transferee fails to provide requested document to the Director in the time set forth above, the Director determines with reasonable discretion that the transfer would be to an entity that has not had experience developing projects of comparable size and complexity to the Project, or the entity does not have sufficient net worth and financial fitness to carry out the Project, provided that the Community Development Director's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. City shall notify Owner in writing of the Community Development Director’s approval or disapproval of the transferee within thirty (30) days of City's receipt of Owner's Notice of Transfer and all supporting information requested by the Director regarding the proposed transferee. Failure by City to notify Owner within such thirty (30) day period shall constitute the Community Development Director's approval of such transferee. Owner shall have the right to appeal the determination of the Community Development Director to the City Council within ten days of the Director’s determination.

18.3. Transfer to Lender. Nothing contained in this Section 18 shall prevent a transfer of the Property, or any portion thereof, to an institutional lender as a result of a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure and any lender acquiring the Property, or any portion thereof, as a result of foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure shall take such Property subject to the rights and obligations of Owner under this Agreement; provided, however, that, in no event shall such lender be liable for any defaults or monetary obligations of Owner arising prior to acquisition of title to the Property by such lender and, provided further that, in no event shall any such lender or its successors or assigns be entitled to a building permit or occupancy clearance for which the applicable permits have not been issued and/or fees have not been paid to City.

18.4. Conditions of Transfer. The sale, transfer or assignment of Owner's rights and interests under this Agreement may be permitted only if (a) Owner is not then in default under this Agreement; (b) Owner has provided to City notice of such transfer; and (c) the transferee executes and delivers to City a written agreement in which (1) the name and address of the transferee is set forth; and (2) the transferee expressly and Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

unconditionally assumes all the obligations of Owner under this Agreement with respect to the Property and Project or with respect to the portion of the Property and Project that is being transferred.

18.5. Exceptions to Obtaining City Consent. Notwithstanding Subsection

18.4, mortgages, deeds of trust, sales and leasebacks or any other form of conveyance required for any reasonable method of financing are permitted without consent, but only for the purpose of securing loans of funds to be used for financing or refinancing the development and construction of improvements related to the Project and other necessary and related expenses. The holder of any mortgage, deed of trust or other security arrangement with respect to the Property, or any portion thereof, shall not be obligated under this Agreement to construct or complete improvements or to guarantee such construction or completion, but shall otherwise be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to construe, permit, or authorize any such holder to devote the Property, or any portion thereof, to any uses, or to construct any improvements thereon, other than those uses, and improvements provided for or authorized by this Agreement, subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

18.6. Reorganization of Owner’s Business Structure Exception. Nothing in this Section shall be deemed to constitute or require City consent to an assignment that consists solely of a reorganization of the Developer’s business structure, such as (i) any sale pledge, assignment or other transfer of all or a portion of the Project Site to an entity directly controlled by Developer or its affiliates and (ii) any change in Developer entity form, such as a transfer from a corporation to a limited liability company or partnership, that does not affect or change beneficial ownership of the Project Site; provided, however, in such event, Developer shall provide to City written notice, together with such backup materials or information reasonably requested by City, within thirty (30) days following the date of such reorganization or City’s request for back up information, as applicable.

19. Affordable Housing Agreement – The applicant shall submit to the City an affordable housing agreement for review and approval by the Community Development Department that provides for the on-going affordability of the Project.

19.1. Approval of this residential project is subject to execution of an Affordable Housing Covenant entered into between the Owner and City of Thousand Oaks. Said Affordable Housing covenant shall incorporate the following conditions and is subject to approval by the City Attorney and Community Development Director.

19.2. Affordable Housing Covenant shall be recorded prior to final building permit issuance. Covenant shall be recorded to provide notice to any future owners.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

19.3. The Affordable Housing Covenant shall require Owner to maintain thirty (30) units as Very Low Income affordable units and three (3) units as Moderate Income affordable units. The units will be preserved at the Very Low-income level of fifty (50%) percent of the Ventura County median income and the Moderate Income affordable units at one-hundred, twenty (120%) percent of the Area Median Income, or the then current income range limit for Very Low Income Households and Moderate Income Households established for Ventura County under Section 6932 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations as in effect at the time the Owner submits its application for occupancy for the two housing categories, as such limits are adjusted by Actual Household Size. Refer to the 2022 Ventura County Income Limits chart attached hereto as Exhibit E and future amendments and revisions thereto.

19.4. Applicant agrees to execute an Affordable Rental Housing Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant with City that provides for the on-going affordability of these thirty-three (33) restricted units for 55 years from the date the units initially become available for lease.

19.5. The City may extend affordable period if owner does not comply with Affordable Housing Covenant.

19.6. Affordable units must be comparable in exterior appearance and overall quality of construction to market-rate dwelling units in the same residential development. The design and appearance of the affordable units shall be compatible with the design of the market-rate units.

19.7. Affordable units must be dispersed throughout the mixed-use and residential use buildings of the development in a manner acceptable to the City.

19.8. The Affordable Housing Covenant shall be in compliance with the latest California State requirements.

19.9. The Affordable Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and City Attorney’s office prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any new building(s).

20. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of Owner and City and not for the benefit of any other party. There shall be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of Owner’s or City’s obligations under this Agreement.

21. Severability. If any terms, provisions, conditions or covenants in this Agreement, or the application thereof to any Party or circumstances, shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such terms, provisions, conditions or covenants to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

22. Interpretation and Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Ventura County.

23. Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

24. Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous Terms.

24.1. General/Mandatory/Permissive. The singular includes the plural; the masculine gender includes the feminine; “shall” is mandatory, “may” is permissive.

24.2. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence regarding each provision of this Agreement of which time is an element.

24.3. Cooperation. Each Party covenants to take such reasonable actions and execute all documents that may be necessary to achieve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement, provided City shall not be obligated to institute a lawsuit or other court proceeding in this connection.

24.4. Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Neither Party shall do anything which shall have the effect of harming or injuring the right of the Party to receive the benefits of this Agreement; each Party shall refrain from doing anything which should render its performance under this Agreement impossible; and each Party shall do everything which this Agreement contemplates that such Party shall do in order to accomplish the objectives and purposes of this Agreement.

24.5. Estoppel Certificates. Either Party may, at any time, and from time to time, deliver written notice to the other Party requesting such Party to certify in writing that, to the knowledge of the certifying Party, (a) this Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the Parties; (b) this Agreement has not been amended or modified or, if so amended or modified, identifying the amendments or modifications; and (c) the requesting Party is not in default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or if in default, to describe therein the nature and extent of any such defaults.

The requesting Party may designate a reasonable form of certificate (including a lender’s form) and the Party receiving a request hereunder shall execute and return such certificate or give a written, detailed response explaining why it will not do so within fifteen (15) days following the receipt thereof. The City Manager, or his or her designee, shall be authorized to execute any certificate requested by Developer hereunder. Developer and City acknowledge that a certificate hereunder may be relied upon by tenants, transferees, investors, lenders, partners, bond counsel, underwriters, and other mortgagees. The request shall clearly indicate that failure of the receiving Party to Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

respond within the fifteen (15) day period will lead to a second and final request and failure to respond to the second and final request within five (5) days of receipt thereof shall be deemed approval of the estoppel certificate. Failure of City or Developer to execute an estoppel certificate shall not be deemed a default.

24.6. Project Is Owner’s Undertaking. The development proposed to be undertaken by Owner is a private development, and Owner may exercise full dominion and control over the Project subject only to the limitations and obligations of Owner contained in this Agreement and the Project Approvals.

24.7. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any exhibits hereto or any amendments and addenda that may be executed in accordance with Section 10 herein contains the entire agreement between the Parties and any agreement or representation respecting the matters dealt with herein or the duties of any Party in relation thereto not expressly set forth in this Agreement shall be null and void.

24.8. Recitals. The Recitals set forth in this Agreement are specifically incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement.

25. Binding Effect of Agreement. Development of the Property is hereby authorized and shall be carried out only in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

The Property and Owner are subject to each term, condition, and covenant of this Agreement.

26. Equitable Servitudes and Covenants Running with the Land. Any successors in interest to City and Developer shall be subject to the provisions set forth in Sections 65865.4 and 65868.5 of the California Government Code. All provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land. Each covenant to do, or refrain from doing, some act with regard to the development of the Property: (a) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon the Property; (b) runs with the Property and each portion thereof; and (c) is binding upon each Party and each successor in interest during ownership of the Property or any portion thereof.

Nothing herein shall waive or limit the provisions of Section 18, and no successor owner of the Property, any portion of it, or any interest in it shall have any rights except those assigned to the successor by the developer in writing pursuant to Section 18. In any event, no owner or tenant of an individual completed residential unit within Project shall have any rights under this Agreement.

27. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event of any action between the City and Owner for enforcement or interpretation of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs and expenses, including without limitation court costs and attorneys’ fees actually and reasonably incurred, as awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction. This Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

28. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This agreement, not counting the Cover Page or signature page, consists of 32 pages and 5 Exhibits.

29. Duty to Hold Harmless, Defend and Indemnify. Excepting as to the extent any loss, property damage or injury arose from the City’s or the City’s officers’, agents’, employees’, or contractors’ breach of this Agreement, or their acts of negligence or willful misconduct, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, Developer hereby agrees to end, indemnify, and hold City, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage arising from this Agreement or alleged to have been caused by Developer or Developer’s contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by Developer, or by any of Developer’s contractors, subcontractors, or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by or acting as agent for Developer or any of Developer’s contractors or subcontractors. Developer further agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officers and employees, from any third-party claim, action or proceeding against the City or its officers or employees to set aside, void, or annul, all or any part of this Agreement or any Project Approval.

In the event any claim, action, or proceeding is instituted against City, and/or its officers, agents, and employees, by any third party on account of the processing, approval, or implementation of the Project Approvals and/or this Agreement, then the Parties shall comply with Section 17. As an alternative to defending any such action, Developer may request that the City rescind any approved land use entitlement. The City will promptly notify Developer of any known claims, actions, or similar proceedings, and will cooperate fully in the defense thereof.

30. Prevailing Wages. Without limiting the foregoing, Owner acknowledges the requirements of California Labor Code §1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects, as defined. If on-site or offsite improvements pursuant to this Agreement are being performed by Developer as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation under the contract in question is $1,000 or more, Developer agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Developer understands and agrees that it is Developer’s obligation to determine if Prevailing Wages apply to work done on the Project or any portion of the Project. Upon Developer’s request, the City shall provide a copy of the then current prevailing rates of per diem wages.

Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold the city, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure by Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

Developer to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws associated with any “public works” or “maintenance” projects associated with Project development.

31. Enforced Delay; Extension of Time of Performance. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, whenever a period of time, including a reasonable period of time, is designated within which either Party is required to do or complete any act, matter or thing, the time for the doing or completion thereof shall be extended by a period of time equal to the number of days during which such Party is actually prevented from, or is unreasonably interfered with, the doing or completion of such act, matter or thing because of causes beyond the reasonable control of the Party to be excused, including:
war; insurrection; strikes; walkouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; pandemics; acts of God; litigation and administrative proceedings against the Project (not including any administrative proceedings contemplated by this Agreement in the normal course of affairs such as the annual review).

32. Dispute Resolution

32.1. Dispute Resolution Proceedings. The Parties may agree to dispute resolution proceedings in an effort to resolve disputes or questions of interpretation under this Agreement in a fair expeditious manner. These dispute resolution proceedings may include: (a) procedures developed by the City for expeditious interpretation of questions arising under development agreements; (b) arbitration as provided below; or (c) any other manner of dispute resolution which is mutually agreed upon by the parties.

32.2. Arbitration. Any dispute between the Parties that the Parties agree to resolve by arbitration shall be settled and decided by arbitration conducted by an arbitrator who must be a former judge of the Ventura County Superior Court or Appellate Justice of the Second District Court of Appeals or the California Supreme Court. This arbitrator shall be selected by mutual agreement of the Parties. If the parties are unable to promptly agree upon an arbitrator, each will provide a list of three available judges to the other and the other party may strike one. If only one judge remains from this process (because some of the judges on the two lists are identical), then that judge shall serve as the arbitrator. If two or more judges remain from this process, then the parties shall endeavor in good faith to select one of them as the arbitrator. In the event that the parties cannot select an arbitrator, the matter shall be submitted to JAMS for selection of a JAMS panel arbitrator.

32.3. Arbitration Procedures. Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the matter shall be set for arbitration at a time not less than thirty (30) nor more than ninety (90) days from the effective date of the appointment of the arbitrator. The arbitration shall be conducted under the procedures set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 638 et seq., or under such other procedures as are agreeable to both Parties, except that provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure pertaining to discovery and the provisions of the California Evidence Code shall be applicable to such proceeding.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

33. Extension of Term. The Term of this Agreement, as set forth in Section 3, above, shall automatically be extended for the period of time in which the Parties are engaged in dispute resolution to the degree that such extension of the Term is reasonably required because activities which would have been completed prior to the expiration of the Term are delayed beyond the scheduled expiration of the Term as the result of such dispute resolution.

34. Recordation.

34.1. This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation hereof shall be recorded in the Official Records of Ventura County by the Clerk of City within ten (10) days after the Agreement Effective Date and within ten (10) days after any amendment or cancellation hereof. Failure to timely record the Agreement shall not constitute a default or invalidate the Agreement.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is entered into by the parties hereto and made effective as of the Effective Date set forth hereinabove. “CITY”

CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS,
a municipal corporation
By: ________________________________
Kevin McNamee, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Laura B. McGuire, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO ADMINISTRATION
______________________ ________________________________ Patrick J. Hehir, Andrew P. Powers, City Manager
Chief Assistant City Attorney
“OWNER”
By: _______________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: _______________________________
Acknowledgements on following pages.

Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
On , , before me,
(here insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
On , , before me,
(here insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)
Page i
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description of Property

THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE TITLE SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THAT CERTAIN PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, 00029885-994-LT2, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE DECEMBER 7, 2021 AT 7:30AM; TITLE OFFICER TED TAN AND JENNIFER WRIGHT (LA/COMM). SAID REPORT IS PRESUMED TO BE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. STANTEC DOES NOT WARRANT THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SAID REPORT. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIBES THE

SAME PROPERTY AS INSURED IN SUCH TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT AND ALL PROPERTY SPECIFIC EXCEPTIONS HAVE BEEN NOTED HEREIN.

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT FOLLOWS REFERS TO SAID TITLE REPORT WITH THE “AS-SURVEYED" BEARINGS AND DISTANCES IN PARENTHESES REPRESENTING THE MAP HEREON:

THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 20 WEST, J.

EDWARDS TRACT NO. 1, RANCHO EL CONEJO, IN THE COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

ACCORDING TO THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 746 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

IST: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO CHRISTIAN J. BRANDT, RECORDED IN BOOK 26, PAGE 634 OF DEEDS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF W. HILLCREST DRIVE 84 FEET WIDE; THENCE,
2ND: SOUTHERLY (N 035'56" E 678.41') AL0N6 THE WESTERLY LINE OF CHRISTIAN J. BRANDT PROPERTY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 "D" IN THAT CERTAIN LIS PENDENS FILED AS CASE #49765 AND RECORDED JULY 7, 1966 IN BOOK 3012 PAGE 370 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE 3RD: NORTH 8606’00" WEST 305.25 FEET (N 8555’44" W 305.25') TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE, 4TH: NORTH 1415’26" WEST 47.62 FEET (N 1405'10" W 47.62') TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE, 5TH: NORTH 8755'36" WEST 42.90 FEET (N 8741'41" W 42.90') TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE, 6TH: SOUTH 712'36" WEST 38.29 FEET (S 726'21" W 38.29') TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE. 7TH: N0RTH 4333’50" WEST 453.25 FEET (N 4304’34" W 453.02’) TO A POINT; THENCE, 8TH: NORTH 7939’26" WEST 4.10 FEET (S 7928'43" E 4.02') TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF RANCHO CONEJO BOULEVARD 84 FEET WIDE; THENCE,
9TH: NORTHERLY (N 1032'09" E 174.32') ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF RANCHO CONEJ0 BOULEVARD

TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO HUMBLE OIL AND REFINING COMPANY, A Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)
Page ii
DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 1968 IN BOOK 3392 PAGE 87 OF 0FFICAL RECORDS;

THENCE,
10TH: SOUTH 8935'00" EAST 167.11 FEET (N 8908'40" W 167.12') TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HUMBLE OIL PROPERTY; THENCE,
11TH: NORTH 025’00" WEST 150 FEET (S 051'20" W 149.99') TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HUMBLE OIL PROPERTY SAID POINT ALS0 BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF W. HILLCREST DRIVEE 84 FEET WIDE; THENCE.
12TH: EASTERLY (S 8908'40” E 368.46') ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF W. HILLCREST DRIVE (TO A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1791.90 FEET AND AN INTERNAL ANGLE OF 340’32" A DISTANCE OF 114.95 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

EXCEPT AN UNDIVIDED ONE—HALF OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN, UNDER

AND UPON SAID PROPERTY, WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO DRILL, DIG OR MINE THROUGH THE SURFACE OF

THE LAND THEREFOR, AND WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO ENTER OR ENCROACH UPON ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SURFACE AS RESERVED IN DEED FROM ADOLPH I. FRIEDRICH, JR., ET AL., RECORDED IN BOOK 1586 PAGE 229 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPT ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN, UNDER AND UPON SAID LAND,

WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO DRILL, DIG OR MINE THROUGH THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, THEREFOR, AND WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO ENTER OR ENCROACH UPON ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING WITHIN 500

FEET OF THE SURFACE AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM CONEJO VALLEY CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, RECORDED JULY 25, 1962 IN BOOK 2182, PAGE 350; AND RE-RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 1962 IN BOOK 2243 PAGE 362 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

EXCEPT THERE FROM, ALL UNDERGROUND WATER IN OR UNDER OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED FROM SAID PROPERTY WHICH UNDERLIES A PLANE PARALLEL TO AND 25 FEET BELOW THE PRESENT SURFACE

OF SAID PROPERTY, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY OR ANY PORTION THEREOF ABOVE THE PLANE PARALLEL TO 25 FEET BELOW THE PRESENT SURFACE OF SAID

PROPERTY FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER, AS RESERVED BY THE CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 4, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 93- 038641 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

APN: 667-0-113-075
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)
Page iii
EXHIBIT “B”
Site Plan
Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)
Page iv
EXHIBIT “C”
Project Plan Set dated May 26, 2023
(Will be attached upon approval, see Attachment #5 (Project Plan Set)) Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)
Page v
EXHIBIT “D”
Conditions of Approval
(Will be attached upon approval, see Attachment #6, Pages 30-100) Item No. 10B
cdd:420-82/H:COMMON/City Council/Agenda Packet/2023/2023-06-20/Latigo/Latigo 2022-70733 Attach 9.docx/pz (FILE ID: 2022-70777-DAGR)
Page vi
EXHIBIT “E”
Ventura County Income Limits Chart
2022 Ventura County Income Limits
People per Household
Annual
Income
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Acutely Low
(15%)
$12,100 $13,850 $15,550 $17,300 $18,700 $20,050 $21,450 $22,850 Extremely
Low (30%)
$26,350 $30,100 $33,850 $37,600 $40,650 $43,650 $46,650 $49,650 Very Low
(50%)
$43,900 $50,200 $56,450 $62,700 $67,750 $72,750 $77,750 $82,800 Lower (80%) $70,250 $80,300 $90,350 $100,350 $108,400 $116,450 $124,450 $132,500 Median
(100%)
$80,800 $92,300 $103,850 $115,400 $124,650 $133,850 $143,100 $152,350 Moderate
(120%)
$96,950 $110,800 $124,650 $138,500 $149,600 $160,650 $171,750 $182,800 Item No. 10B





@90





4?D
:1
'3:@>,9/
",6>
4?D
:@9.47

0A49
.!,800
,D:=

7
/,8
,D:=
#=:
'08

:-
9270=
:@9.47808-0=

,A4/
!0B8,9
:@9.47808-0=

460D
',D7:=
:@9.47808-0=


'3:@>,9/
",6>
7A/

'3:@>,9/
",6>



68.9,800?:,6>:=2
,,/,8?:,6>:=2
-09270=?:,6>:=2
/90B8,9?:,6>:=2
8?,D7:=?:,6>:=2

@>?490

09/,77

#
>>:.4,?0
#7,990=

:88@94?D
0A07:;809?
0;,=?809?

4?D
:1
'3:@>,9/
",6>


'3:@>,9/
",6>
:@70A,=/

'3:@>,9/
",6>



5609/,77?:,6>:=2


"&$%
!#
'% $
!
!

%(
!& 

#

!#
%

!

#$%
#!
%


 


0,=
,D:=
.!,800
,D:=
#=:
'08
/,8
,9/
08-0=>
:1
?30
4?D
:@9.47



,8
B=4?492
:9
-03,71
:1
&@;;:=?0=>
774,9.0
:=
9A4=:9809?,7
%0>;:9>4-474?D
G&%H
=02,=/492
?30
9A4=:9809?,7

8;,.?
%0;:=?
G
%H
1:=
?30
,?42:
477.=0>?
#=:50.?

G#=:50.?H
;=:;:>0/
49
?30
4?D
:1
'3:@>,9/
",6>
G4?DH
'30
4?D
49?09/>
?:
3:7/
,
4?D
:@9.47
30,=492
?:
8,60
,
/0?0=849,?4:9
=02,=/492
?30
 %
1:=
?30
#=:50.?
:9

@90




&%
4>
=0<@0>?492
?3,?
?30
4?D
:@9.47
0C?09/
?30
30,=492
/,?0
1:=
?30
#=:50.?
/@0
?:
9:?
3,A492
=0.04A0/
9:?4.0
:1
?30
=070,>0
:1
?30
49,7

%
G
%H
9:=
:1
,9D
30,=492>
:9
?30

#=:50.?
'30
;@-74.
3,>
,
;=4A47020/
;:>4?4:9
49
;=:50.?
=0A40B
@9/0=
?30
,741:=94,
9A4=:9809?,7
$@,74?D
.?
G$H
,9/
0C?09/492
?30
30,=492
/,?0
?:
,77:B
,//4?4:9,7
?480
1:=
=0A40B
B477
1@=?30=
?30
;@=;:>0>
:1
$


&%
/4/
9:?
=0.04A0
9:?4.0
?3,?
?30

%
B,>
=070,>0/
1:=
?34>
#=:50.?
9:=
?30

>.30/@7492
:1
?30
#7,99492
:884>>4:9
:=
4?D
:@9.47
30,=492>
?:
.:9>4/0=
?30
 %
/0>;4?0

3,A492
>@-84??0/
,
$
9:?4.0
=0<@0>?
:9
;=47




??,.30/
30=0?:
,>
C34-4?


&%
:97D
-0.,80
,B,=0
?3,?
?30
4?D
:@9.47
30,=492
B,>
>.30/@70/
-D
.:9/@.?492
4?>
:B9
=0A40B
:1
?30
4?DI>
#7,99492
:884>>4:9
,209/,
#@-74.
%0>:@=.0>
:/0
G#%H
F
 ,
>?,?0>
?3,?
G*,+
70,/
,209.D
?3,?
4>
;=0;,=492
,9
09A4=:9809?,7
48;,.?
=0;:=?
:=
,
902,?4A0
/0.7,=,?4:9
:=
8,6492
,
/0?0=849,?4:9
;@=>@,9?
?:
>@-/4A4>4:9
.
:1
&0.?4:9
 
>3,77

;=:A4/0
;@-74.
9:?4.0
:1
?3,?
1,.?
B4?349
,
=0,>:9,-70
;0=4:/
:1
?480
;=4:=
?:
.0=?414.,?4:9
:1
?30
Item No. 10B
ATTACHMENT #10
Request for Extension of City Council Hearing
Latigo Hillcrest Project
June 13, 2023

environmental impact report.” PRC § 21092(b)(3) states that the notice required pursuant to the section “shall be given to the last known name and address of all organizations and individuals who have previously requested notice.” The City’s failure to provide notice to SAFER of the FEIR release and of the hearings on the Project was in error.

CEQA requires the lead agency to provide the FEIR to all public entities that commented on the Draft EIR at least 10 days before certifying the EIR. PRC §21092.5. Many public agencies, as well as SAFER, commented on the DEIR, including CalTrans, the Ventura County Air District, the County of Ventura, and the Ventura County Fire Department. The City was required to provide these entities with the FEIR at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing. When the City provided the FEIR to the public agencies, it became a public record. At that time, since this firm requested all CEQA documents pursuant to CEQA section 21092.2, we should have been provided with the FEIR. However, we did not receive the document from the City at all. Thus, SAFER did not have the required ten days prior to the Planning Commission hearing to review and comment on the FEIR. We request that the City continue the City Council hearing by at least ten days to allow the required review period for the FEIR.

Extending the date of the final Project hearing will also further the purposes of CEQA.

As the Court held in Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of Univ. of California (1988) 47 Cal. 3d 376, 392:

The EIR is also intended “to demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological implications of its action.” (No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 86 [118 Cal.Rptr. 34, 529 P.2d 66] [hereafter No Oil]; Guidelines, § 15003, subd. (d).) Because the EIR must be certified or rejected by public officials, it is a document of accountability. If CEQA is scrupulously followed, the public will know the basis on which its responsible officials either approve or reject environmentally significant action, and the public, being duly informed, can respond accordingly to action with which it disagrees. (People v. County of Kern (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 830, 842 [115 Cal.Rptr. 67]; Guidelines, § 15003, subd. (e).) The EIR process protects not only the environment but also informed self-government.

Based on the above, SAFER respectfully requests that the City Council extend the date of the City Council hearing on the Project by at least ten days in order to give SAFER and other members of the public adequate time to review the Final EIR prior to the City of Thousand Oaks’ final decision.

Sincerely,
Amalia Bowley Fuentes
Lozeau Drury LLP
Item No. 10B

EXHIBIT A
Item No. 10B
Via Email
April 24, 2023
Re: CEQA and Land Use Notice Request for the Latigo Hillcrest Project Dear Mr. Parker, Ms. Maguire, and Ms. Kendall,
I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) regarding the Latigo Hillcrest Project, including all actions related or referring to the proposed construction of a fourstory mixed-use project with 333 units, located at 2150 W. Hillcrest Dr., Newbury Park, in the City of Thousand Oaks (“Project”).

We hereby request that the City of Thousand Oaks send by electronic mail, if possible or U.S. mail to our firm at the address below notice of any and all actions or hearings related to activities undertaken, authorized, approved, permitted, licensed, or certified by the City of Thousand Oaks and any of its subdivisions, and/or supported, in whole or in part, through contracts, grants, subsidies, loans or other forms of assistance from the City of Thousand Oaks, including, but not limited to the following:
• Notice of any public hearing in connection with the Project as required by California Planning and Zoning Law pursuant to Government Code Section 65091. • Any and all notices prepared for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), including, but not limited to:
 Notices of any public hearing held pursuant to CEQA.
 Notices of determination that an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) is required for the Project, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.4.  Notices of any scoping meeting held pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.9.  Notices of preparation of an EIR or a negative declaration for the Project, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.
 Notices of availability of an EIR or a negative declaration for the Project, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21152 and Section 15087 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

Kelvin Parker, Community Development
Director of Thousand Oaks
2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
[email protected]
Laura Maguire, City Clerk
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
[email protected]
Justine Kendall, City Planner
Planning Division
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
[email protected]
Item No. 10B
April 24, 2023
CEQA and Land Use Notice Request for the Latigo Hillcrest Project

 Notices of approval and/or determination to carry out the Project, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21152 or any other provision of law.  Notices of any addenda prepared to a previously certified or approved EIR.  Notices of approval or certification of any EIR or negative declaration, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21152 or any other provision of law.  Notices of determination that the Project is exempt from CEQA, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21152 or any other provision of law.  Notice of any Final EIR prepared pursuant to CEQA.
 Notice of determination, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21108 or Section 21152.

Please note that we are requesting notices of CEQA actions and notices of any public hearings to be held under any provision of Title 7 of the California Government Code governing California Planning and Zoning Law. This request is filed pursuant to Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2 and 21167(f), and Government Code Section 65092, which require local counties to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.

Please send notice by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to:

Richard Drury
Molly Greene
Colby Gonzalez
Lozeau Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Please call if you have any questions. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Colby Gonzalez
Lozeau | Drury LLP
Item No. 10B
Agenda Related Items - Meeting of June 20, 2023
Supplemental Packet Date: June 20, 2023

THOUSAND OAKS CITY COUNCIL
Supplemental
Information
Packet
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):

In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Department at (805) 449-2151. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. Ask City Clerk staff if you desire to use this device. Upon request, the agenda and documents in this agenda packet, can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
2:30 p.m.

Supplemental Information:

Any agenda related public documents received and distributed to a majority of the City Council after the Agenda Packet is printed are included in Supplemental Packets. Supplemental Packets are produced as needed, typically a minimum of two—one available on the Thursday preceding the City Council meeting and the second on Tuesday at the meeting. The Supplemental Packet is available for public inspection on the City’s website at toaks.org/agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Dept at (805) 449-2151 during normal business hours [main location pursuant to the Brown Act, G.C. 54957.5(2)].

Item No. 10B
From: Hind Baki <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 11:07 AM
To: Justine Kendall <[email protected]>; City Clerk's Office <[email protected]>; Mitchell Tsai <[email protected]>; Stephanie Papayanis <[email protected]>; Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C. <[email protected]>
Subject: SWMSRCC - City of Thousand Oaks - 2150 W. Hillcrest Drive Mixed Use Project - City Council Meeting - Two Comment Letters
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning Justine,
Our Firm would like to submit the attached two Comment
Letters for the 2150 W. Hillcrest Drive project (Agenda item 8 B at tonight's City Council meeting). We would appreciate confirmation of receipt of these two letters.

Many thanks,
--Hind
Hind Baki
Paralegal
Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law
139 South Hudson Avenue, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91101
Office: (626) 314-3821
Fax: (626) 389-5414
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.mitchtsailaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages accompanying it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (626) 314-3821 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk. Thank you. 72&281&,/

$*(1'$,7(012
%
0((7,1*'$7(

96 Item No. 10B

VIA E-MAIL
June 20, 2023
Justine Kendall, AICP, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Em: [email protected]
Laura Maguire, City Clerk
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Em: [email protected]
RE: City of Thousand Oaks’ 2150 West Hillcrest Drive Mixed Use Project.

Dear Justine Kendall,
On behalf of the Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters (“Southwest Mountain States Carpenters” or “SWMSRCC”), my Office is submitting these supplemental comments for the City of Thousand Oaks’ (“City”) Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) for the June 20, 2023 City Council meeting for the 2150 West Hillcrest Drive Mixed Use Project (“Project” or “Latigo Hillcrest Project”).

The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project. Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, § 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199-1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121.

The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters incorporates by reference all comments related to the Project or its CEQA review, including the Environmental Impact 97 Item No. 10B
Report (“EIR”). See Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project’s environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).

I. THE PROJECT WOULD BE APPROVED IN VIOLATION OF

THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
A. Background Concerning the California Environmental Quality Act The California Environmental Quality Act is a California statute designed to inform decision-makers and the public about the potential significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”), § 15002, subd. (a)(1).1
At its core, its purpose is to “inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made.” Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.

B. The Project May Have a Significant Effect on Biological Resources As discussed in this office’s May 22, 2023 and June 1, 2023 comment letters, the Project may have a significant effect on biological resources for a number of reasons.

1. Bats, Birds and Wildlife Species.

The DEIR ultimately concludes that the Project will either have no impact, a less than significant impact, or a less than significant impact after mitigation, despite acknowledging facts showing that the Project may indeed have impacts.2 Specifically,
with regards to the Project’s potential impact on native species, the DEIR notes that the Project Site contains mature trees that could potentially be used by the Cooper’s hawk (Accipter cooperii), a species listed on the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) Watchlist, for nesting.3
Furthermore, the DEIR notes that “the pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), a CDFW Species of Special Concern, is known to roost in vacant structures and could therefore 1 The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq., are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. Cal. Pub. Res. Code, § 21083. The CEQA Guidelines are given “great weight in interpreting CEQA except when . . . clearly unauthorized or erroneous.” Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 217. 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report (Apr. 2023), pp. ES-6-7. 3 Id. at p. 4.2-11.
98 Item No. 10B
potentially roost in the building on site.4
Yet, the DEIR merely relies on the Project’s
compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) to conclude that this would reduce to a level of less than significant the Project’s potential impact to the Cooper’s hawk and other birds that have potential to nest at the Project Site.5 However, mere
reliance on a project’s regulatory compliance is insufficient to conclude that the Project’s potential impacts would be reduced to a level of less than significant. Even further, regarding the Project’s potential impact on pallid bats, the DEIR proposes the implementation of mitigation measure BIO-1, which states that [n]o earlier than three days prior to ground or vegetation disturbing activities, and separately three days prior to demolition if occurring 14 days or more after ground or vegetation disturbing activities, a City-approved qualified biologist shall inspect the outside and inside of the vacant structure for sign of roosting bats, . . . [and a] report of the bat survey results shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to ground and/or vegetation disturbance activities. If evidence of bat roosting is observed, building demolition shall not be allowed until a qualified biologist can verify that the roost is no longer active.

Separate ground or vegetation disturbing activities may commence if determined appropriate by the biologist, with or without an avoidance buffer if found necessary. If necessary, bats may be evicted and building demolished following submittal and approval of a Bat Avoidance Plan by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).6 However, the proposed mitigation measure is deficient for a number of reasons. First, the mitigation measure relies on potentially the Applicant’s own qualified biologist7 inspecting the Project Site after the Project has already been approved. Yet, it is settled that a mitigation measure is inappropriate if all it does is require a report to be prepared and followed, or allow approval by a public agency without setting any standards. California Clean Energy Committee v. City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 4 Id. at pp. 4.2-11-12. 5 Id.
6 Id.
7 While the mitigation measure indicates that the biologist should be “City-approved” – it does not mean the biologist will be provided by the City itself. In other words, just by requiring City' approval of the biologist, the City is not committing to this mitigation measure itself. Instead, it remains the Applicant’s commitment to hire a biologist. 99 Item No. 10B
173, 195, citing to Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of Orange (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 777, 794 (court found the mitigation measure inadequate where it did not identify any specific mitigation measures and did not provide any standards for the community development department to adhere to in deciding whether the developerproposed mitigation is sufficient.) In the City’s May 2023 Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”), the City responds to SWMSRCC’s May 22, 2023 comment pertaining to the pallid bats, stating in Response 4-9 that
“[t]he EIR considers potential impacts to bird species, including the hawk, to be less than significant with regulatory compliance with the MBTA.

However, while pallid bats are not known to be present, the EIR includes a mitigation measure to assure no potential impacts. Mitigation measure BIO-1 specifically requires a ‘a [sic] City-approved qualified biologist’ and also that the biologist report will be reviewed by the City. Thus, the concern about lack of City involvement is unfounded.”
FEIR, p. 2.0-6-7. [Emphasis added.]
However, the City’s response to SWMSRCC’s comment misinterprets in part the issue at hand. As highlighted in SWMSRCC’s May 22, 2023 comment letter, the first issue here pertains to the fact that the referenced qualified biologist would conduct an inspection of the Project Site after the Project has already been approved.

See, SWMSRCC May 22, 2023 Comment Letter p. 11. The City should require that a survey of the Project Site be conducted prior to any adoption of the Project’s Environmental Impact Report so that it can be determined whether pallid bats do in fact exist at the Project Site.

Furthermore, and as previously discussed in the SWMSRCC’s May 22, 2023 comment letter, the mitigation measure is illusory on its face by including numerous “if”’s and conditioning on the measure’s compliance on the biologist’s discretion. Yet, CEQA requires mitigation measures to be specific and fully enforceable. In the words of the court in an analogous situation:

In addition, the agency “shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures” (§ 21081.6, subd. (b))4
and must adopt a monitoring program to ensure that the mitigation 100
Item No. 10B
measures are implemented (§ 21081.6, subd. (a)). The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that feasible mitigation measures will actually be implemented as a condition of development, and not merely adopted and then neglected or disregarded. (See § 21002.1, subd. (b).)5

. . . . However, the circumstances here do not support a finding that the city has made a binding commitment to implement the mitigation measures or, more appropriately, that they are incorporated into the project or required as a condition of project approval in a manner that will ensure their implementation.

Federation of Hillside and Canyon Associations v. City of Los Angeles (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1252, 1260–1261.

However, the City fails to address this particular point in its FEIR responses to comments. See, FEIR, pp. 2.0-6-7.

Next, and as previously raised by this office, the Draft EIR concludes that the bats may, if necessary, be evicted if a Bat Avoidance Plan has been approved. However, this does not actually mitigate the Project’s potential impacts to the bats and relies on some later inspection to be taken after the Project’s approval. Although the City addresses the oversight by the City and CDFW in its response to these issues, it fails to address the fact that the use of a qualified biologist to inspect the Project Site after the Project’s approval or the fact that the bats still may, if necessary, be evicted pursuant to BIO-1, suggest that impacts to the bat species would not actually be mitigated.

Neither does the EIR accurately disclose, or account for, the fact that CDFW and other agencies afford specific protections to bats, in light of their declining numbers.

Indeed, California Department of Fish and Wildlife alarms about the devastating decline in bat population and calls for reports of bat colonies to ensure their protection.8
Bats are considered non-game mammals and are afforded protection by State law from take and/or harassment. Fish & Game Code, § 4150; Cal. Code of Regs, § 251.1. Several bat species are considered SSC and meet the CEQA definition of rare, threatened, or endangered species (CEQA Guidelines, § 15065). Take of SSC could require a mandatory finding of significance by the City (CEQA Guidelines, § 15065). To protect this declining population of bats and mitigate impacts on bats and 8 See, https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Mammals/Bats/Report-Colony 101
Item No. 10B
other species, including both individual and cumulative impacts, CDFW requires specific mitigation measures and accurate disclosures that the EIR must follow here.9 Therefore, mitigation measure BIO-1 is insufficient and does not adequately mitigate the Project’s potential environmental impact on native species to a level of less than significant. As such, the DEIR should be revised and recirculated to properly address the outstanding concerns with regards to the Project’s potential impact on pallid bats.

2. Protected Trees
As discussed in this office’s May 22, 2023 and June 1, 2023 comment letters, the Project calls for the removal of at least seventeen (17) protected coast live oak trees and the encroachment into the protected zone of eleven (11) coast live oak trees at the Project Site, which requires a Protected Tree Permit.10 Thus, such a permit is granted with various conditions, namely the replacement of the removed trees at a ratio set by the Oak Tree Preservation and Protection Guidelines or payment of an in-lieu fee if replacement is not possible.11
Although the City’s FEIR response to this comment in Response 4-10 addresses a tree replacement ratio and/or payment of an in-lieu fee as permitted by Resolution 2010-014 – Oak Tree Preservation and Protection Ordinance, the Response still fails to address the points made in the SWMSRCC’s prior comment letters pertaining to the air quality impacts associated with removing mature trees and replacing them with other trees. SWMSRCC incorporates by reference all comments raised in its prior comment letters on the Project and its EIR.

Therefore, should the tree removal take place, it may very well result in significant air quality impacts and biological resources impacts and the proposed new trees cannot properly mitigate the impact on air quality of removing the existing trees. The EIR 9 See, CDFW’s March 9, 2021 comment re impacts and mitigation measures for bats and other wildlife species, at pp. 10-12, available at: https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/267688- 1/attachment/pupolhNfxVnGXGh_y--
NmIniSZdkINKbP7Rd3KhoqNm5askrIKMWHWq4quU921GmM70w16t744YXzFde0; and CDFW’s April 27, 2021 comment re impacts and mitigation measures for bats and other species, as well as the cumulative impacts and the need for mitigation measures to be specific and fully responsible, especially at pp. 3-7, available at https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/268673-
1/attachment/p3UvwNo4JJhyoApargV5SY3MXoanD96K9Zsz50CrCJvM0tHfXcsVbxp6lrsl 30NgpxKzGB5or5iXpco_0 10 DEIR, supra, at p. 4.2-3, 4.2-14 11 Id. 102
Item No. 10B
should adequately disclose, and account for, the Project’s biological and air quality impacts associated, inter alia, with the removal or adverse impact to the trees on site.

II. CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, SWMSRCC respectfully requests that the City require the revision and recirculation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA, consistent with the concerns and authority mentioned in this letter.

Sincerely,
____________________________
Stephanie Papayanis
Attorneys for Southwest Mountain
States Regional Council of Carpenters
y
____________________________
Stephanie Papayanis
103
Item No. 10B

VIA E-MAIL
June 20, 2023
Justine Kendall, AICP, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Em: [email protected]
Laura Maguire, City Clerk
City of Thousand Oaks
2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Em: [email protected]
RE: City of Thousand Oaks’ 2150 West Hillcrest Drive Mixed Use Project.

Dear Justine Kendall,
On behalf of the Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters (“Southwest Mountain States Carpenters” or “SWMSRCC”), my Office is submitting these comments for the City of Thousand Oaks’ (“City”) Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) for the June 20, 2023 City Council meeting for the 2150 West Hillcrest Drive Mixed Use Project (“Project” or “Latigo Hillcrest Project”).

The Project proposes to construct two (2) new podium buildings that include a fourstory (4) mixed-use building that contains 333 multi-family residential units, common areas, and amenities, as well as about 5,300 square feet of commercial space with alcohol consumption use above semi-subterranean parking structures, along with the removal of seventeen (17) coast live oak trees and encroachment into eleven (11) coast live oak trees in the protected zone.1
The Project is proposed at the site of a
“long-vacant welcome center property” used as the headquarters for the Amgen 1 Draft Environmental Impact Report Notice of Availability (Apr. 7, 2023), at p. 1. 104
Item No. 10B
biotech company campus and was previously entitled by the City for a 333-unit housing development with 20% of units (i.e., 67 units) set aside as affordable.2 , 3
The Applicant Latigo has just completed another 142-unit luxury mixed-use Santal project at 299 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd, across the street from Tarantula Hill Brewery near Moorpark Road.4
The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters is a labor union representing 63,000 union carpenters in 10 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well-ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects.

Individual members of SWMSRCC live, work, and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental impacts.

The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project. Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, § 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199-1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121.

The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) submitted prior to certification of the EIR for the Project. See Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project’s environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).

Moreover, the Southwest Mountain States Carpenters requests that the City provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the 2 See, Exhibit D, also available at: https://www.toacorn.com/articles/developer-buys-amgenproperty-for-25m/, accessed 5/26/2023 3 Per the EIR, the Project is only proposing 30 affordable units for very low income families.

DEIR, 1.0-1.
4 Id., see also Exhibit E, also available at: https://www.toacorn.com/articles/a-7000- apartment-boulevard-builder-may-break-record-books/, accessed 5/26/2023; and Exhibit F (Latigo’s projects, including in Thousand Oaks), available at https://www.latigogroup.com/current-developments, accessed 5/26/2023. 105
Item No. 10B
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.), and the California Planning and Zoning Law (“Planning and Zoning Law”) (Gov.

Code, §§ 65000–65010). California Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(f) and California Government Code Section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.

I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL
WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY’S ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT
The City should require the Project to be built using local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor-Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state-approved apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state-approved apprenticeship training program.

Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.

Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
106
Item No. 10B
[L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost—and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California’s workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well-trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.5
Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area’s jobs-housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the “[u]se of a local state-certified apprenticeship program” can result in air pollutant reductions.6

Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits.

As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:

People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.7
Moreover, local hire mandates and skill-training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.8
Some municipalities have even tied local hire and
5 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. 6 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10. 7 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobshousing.pdf 8 Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: JobsHousing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 107
Item No. 10B
other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that:

In nearly built-out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city’s First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate-level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment-ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.

Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 (“AB2011”). AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by-right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements.

The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts.

II. THE CITY SHOULD IMPOSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE PROJECT’S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT
COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND OTHER INFECTIOUS

DISEASES
Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High-risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID19.9

72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT825.pdf. 9 Santa Clara County Public Health (June 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT

CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covid19/Pages/press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx. 108
Item No. 10B
Southwest Mountain States Carpenters recommend that the Lead Agency adopt additional requirements to mitigate public health risks from the Project’s construction activities. SWMSRCC requests that the Lead Agency require safe on-site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site.

In particular, based upon Southwest Mountain States Carpenters’ experience with safe construction site work practices, SWMSRCC recommends that the Lead Agency require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site:

Construction Site Design:
• The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points.
• Entry points will have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. • The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details
regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening.
• A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening.
• The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details.
• There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening.
• Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site.

Testing Procedures:
• The temperature screening being used are non-contact
devices.
• Temperature readings will not be recorded.
109
Item No. 10B
• Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual.
• Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before
temperature screening.
• Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be
refused access to the Project Site.
• Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate
[ZONE 2]
• After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors.
• If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading.
• If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A.

Planning
• Require the development of an Infectious Disease
Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic
infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10
people including all-hands meetings and all-hands lunches) 110
Item No. 10B
communication and training and workplace controls that
meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of
Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.10 The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Agency should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site.

Southwest Mountain States Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment (“ICRA”) training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.11
ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities.

ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities.

The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols.

III. THE PROJECT WOULD BE APPROVED IN VIOLATION OF THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
A. Background Concerning the California Environmental Quality Act The California Environmental Quality Act is a California statute designed to inform decision-makers and the public about the potential significant environmental effects of 10 See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America’s Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available at https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU_ CPWR_Standards_COVID-19.pdf; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw_guidelines-construction-sites.pdf. 11 For details concerning Southwest Carpenters’ ICRA training program, see https://icrahealthcare.com/.
111
Item No. 10B
a project. 14 California Code of Regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”), § 15002, subd. (a)(1).12 At its core, its purpose is to “inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made.” Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.

1. Background Concerning Environmental Impact Reports
CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage, when possible, by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subds. (a)(2)-(3); see also Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v. Board of Port Comes (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1354; Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn., 47 Cal.3d at p. 400. The EIR serves to provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to “identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.” CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subd. (a)(2). If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns” specified in Public Resources Code section 21081. See CEQA Guidelines, § 15092, subds. (b)(2)(A)-(B).

While the courts review an EIR using an ‘abuse of discretion’ standard, the reviewing court is not to uncritically rely on every study or analysis presented by a project proponent in support of its position. Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (quoting Laurel Heights Improvement Assn., 47 Cal.3d at pp. 391, 409 fn. 12) (internal quotations omitted). A clearly inadequate or unsupported study is entitled to no judicial deference. Id. Drawing this line and determining whether the EIR complies with CEQA’s information disclosure requirements presents a question of law subject to independent review by the courts. Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 515; Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 48, 102, 131. As the court stated in Berkeley Jets, prejudicial abuse of discretion occurs if the 12 The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq., are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. Cal. Pub. Res. Code, § 21083. The CEQA Guidelines are given “great weight in interpreting CEQA except when . . . clearly unauthorized or erroneous.” Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 217. 112
Item No. 10B
failure to include relevant information precludes informed decision-making and informed public participation, thereby thwarting the statutory goals of the EIR process. 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 1355 (internal quotations omitted).

The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. Communities for a Better Environment v. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, 80 (quoting Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 449-450). The EIR’s function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been considered. Id. For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made. Id.

A strong presumption in favor of requiring preparation of an EIR is built into CEQA.

This presumption is reflected in what is known as the “fair argument” standard under which an EIR must be prepared whenever substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602; Friends of “B” St. v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.3d 988, 1002.

The fair argument test stems from the statutory mandate that an EIR be prepared for any project that “may have a significant effect on the environment.” PRC, § 21151; see No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.App.3d 68, 75; accord Jensen v. City of Santa Rosa (2018) 23 Cal.App.5th 877, 884. Under this test, if a proposed project is not exempt and may cause a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare an EIR. PRC, §§ 21100 (a), 21151; CEQA Guidelines, § 15064 (a)(1), (f)(1).

An EIR may be dispensed with only if the lead agency finds no substantial evidence in the initial study or elsewhere in the record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 785. In such a situation, the agency must adopt a negative declaration. PRC, § 21080, subd. (c)(1); CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15063 (b)(2), 15064(f)(3).
“Significant effect upon the environment” is defined as “a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment.” PRC, § 21068; CEQA Guidelines, 113
Item No. 10B
§ 15382. A project may have a significant effect on the environment if there is a reasonable probability that it will result in a significant impact. No Oil, Inc., 13 Cal.3d at p. 83 fn. 16; see Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 309. If any aspect of the project may result in a significant impact on the environment, an EIR must be prepared even if the overall effect of the project is beneficial. CEQA Guidelines, § 15063(b)(1); see County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1580.

This standard sets a “low threshold” for preparation of an EIR. Consolidated Irrigation Dist. v. City of Selma (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 187, 207; Nelson v. County of Kern (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 252; Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 928; Bowman v. City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 572, 580; Citizen Action to Serve All Students v. Thornley (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 748, 754; Sundstrom, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 310. If substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may have a significant environmental effect, the lead agency must prepare an EIR even if other substantial evidence before it indicates the project will have no significant effect. See Jensen, 23 Cal.App.5th at p. 886; Clews Land & Livestock v. City of San Diego (2017) 19 Cal.App.5th 161, 183; Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 150; Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491; Friends of “B” St., 106 Cal.App.3d 988; CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(f)(1).

For the reasons set forth below, the Project may have a significant effect on the environment. As such, the DEIR must be revised and recirculated to adequately account for the Project’s potential environmental effects.

B. The Project May Have a Significant Effect on Biological Resources The Project may have a significant effect on biological resources for a number of reasons.

1. Bats, Birds and Wildlife Species.

The DEIR ultimately concludes that the Project will either have no impact, a less than significant impact, or a less than significant impact after mitigation, despite acknowledging facts showing that the Project may indeed have impacts.13 Specifically, with regards to the Project’s potential impact on native species, the DEIR notes that 13 Draft Environmental Impact Report (Apr. 2023), pp. ES-6-7. 114
Item No. 10B
the Project Site contains mature trees that could potentially be used by the Cooper’s hawk (Accipter cooperii), a species listed on the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) Watchlist, for nesting.14
Furthermore, the DEIR notes that “the pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), a CDFW Species of Special Concern, is known to roost in vacant structures and could therefore potentially roost in the building on site.15 Yet, the DEIR merely relies on the Project’s compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) to conclude that this would reduce to a level of less than significant the Project’s potential impact to the Cooper’s hawk and other birds that have potential to nest at the Project Site.16 However, mere reliance on a project’s regulatory compliance is insufficient to conclude that the Project’s potential impacts would be reduced to a level of less than significant. Even further, regarding the Project’s potential impact on pallid bats, the DEIR proposes the implementation of mitigation measure BIO-1, which states that [n]o earlier than three days prior to ground or vegetation disturbing activities, and separately three days prior to demolition if occurring 14 days or more after ground or vegetation disturbing activities, a City-approved qualified biologist shall inspect the outside and inside of the vacant structure for sign of roosting bats, . . . [and a] report of the bat survey results shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to ground and/or vegetation disturbance activities. If evidence of bat roosting is observed, building demolition shall not be allowed until a qualified biologist can verify that the roost is no longer active.

Separate ground or vegetation disturbing activities may commence if determined appropriate by the biologist, with or without an avoidance buffer if found necessary. If necessary, bats may be evicted and building demolished following submittal and approval of a Bat Avoidance Plan by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).17 However, the proposed mitigation measure is deficient for a number of reasons. First, the mitigation measure relies on potentially the Applicant’s own qualified biologist18 14 Id. at p. 4.2-11. 15 Id. at pp. 4.2-11-12. 16 Id.
17 Id.
18 While the mitigation measure indicates that the biologist should be “City-approved” – it does not mean the biologist will be provided by the City itself. In other words, just by 115
Item No. 10B
inspecting the Project Site after the Project has already been approved. Yet, it is settled that a mitigation measure is inappropriate if all it does is require a report to be prepared and followed, or allow approval by a public agency without setting any standards. California Clean Energy Committee v. City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 195, citing to Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of Orange (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 777, 794 (court found the mitigation measure inadequate where it did not identify any specific mitigation measures and did not provide any standards for the community development department to adhere to in deciding whether the developerproposed mitigation is sufficient.) Second, the mitigation measure is illusory on its face by including numerous “if”’s and conditioning on the measure’s compliance on the biologist’s discretion. Yet, CEQA requires mitigation measures to be specific and fully enforceable. In the words of the court in an analogous situation:

In addition, the agency “shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures” (§ 21081.6, subd. (b))4
and must adopt a monitoring program to ensure that the mitigation measures are implemented (§ 21081.6, subd. (a)). The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that feasible mitigation measures will actually be implemented as a condition of development, and not merely adopted and then neglected or disregarded. (See § 21002.1, subd. (b).)5

. . . . However, the circumstances here do not support a finding that the city has made a binding commitment to implement the mitigation measures or, more appropriately, that they are incorporated into the project or required as a condition of project approval in a manner that will ensure their implementation.

Federation of Hillside and Canyon Associations v. City of Los Angeles (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1252, 1260–1261.

Third, the Draft EIR concludes that the bats may, if necessary, be evicted if a Bat Avoidance Plan has been approved. However, this does not actually mitigate the requiring City' approval of the biologist, the City is not committing to this mitigation measure itself. Instead, it remains the Applicant’s commitment to hire a biologist. 116
Item No. 10B
Project’s potential impacts to the bats and relies on some later inspection to be taken after the Project’s approval.

Neither does the EIR accurately disclose, or account for, the fact that CDFW and other agencies afford specific protections to bats, in light of their declining numbers.

Indeed, California Department of Fish and Wildlife alarms about the devastating decline in bat population and calls for reports of bat colonies to ensure their protection.19 Bats are considered non-game mammals and are afforded protection by State law from take and/or harassment. Fish & Game Code, § 4150; Cal. Code of Regs, § 251.1. Several bat species are considered SSC and meet the CEQA definition of rare, threatened, or endangered species (CEQA Guidelines, § 15065). Take of SSC could require a mandatory finding of significance by the City (CEQA Guidelines, § 15065). To protect this declining population of bats and mitigate impacts on bats and other species, including both individual and cumulative impacts, CDFW requires specific mitigation measures and accurate disclosures that the EIR must follow here.20 Therefore, mitigation measure BIO-1 is insufficient and does not adequately mitigate the Project’s potential environmental impact on native species to a level of less than significant. As such, the DEIR should be revised and recirculated to properly address the outstanding concerns with regards to the Project’s potential impact on pallid bats.

2. Protected Trees
The Project calls for the removal of at least seventeen (17) protected coast live oak trees and the encroachment into the protected zone of eleven (11) coast live oak trees at the Project Site, which requires a Protected Tree Permit.21 Thus, such a permit is granted with various conditions, namely the replacement of the removed trees at a ratio set by the Oak Tree Preservation and Protection Guidelines or payment of an in19 See, https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Mammals/Bats/Report-Colony 20 See, CDFW’s March 9, 2021 comment re impacts and mitigation measures for bats and other wildlife species, at pp. 10-12, available at: https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/267688- 1/attachment/pupolhNfxVnGXGh_y--
NmIniSZdkINKbP7Rd3KhoqNm5askrIKMWHWq4quU921GmM70w16t744YXzFde0; and CDFW’s April 27, 2021 comment re impacts and mitigation measures for bats and other species, as well as the cumulative impacts and the need for mitigation measures to be specific and fully responsible, especially at pp. 3-7, available at https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/268673-
1/attachment/p3UvwNo4JJhyoApargV5SY3MXoanD96K9Zsz50CrCJvM0tHfXcsVbxp6lrsl 30NgpxKzGB5or5iXpco_0 21 Id. at 4.2-3, 4.2-14
117
Item No. 10B
lieu fee if replacement is not possible.22 However, merely replacing the removed trees is an insufficient solution for various reasons.

First, there are a multitude of issues associated with planting new trees. For instance, there is the strong possibility that many of the trees will not survive. As noted by Lara Roman, a U.S. Forest Service researcher who studies tree mortality, “planting a massive number of trees is not necessarily a positive investment if not enough of them survive to become mature plants.”23
Second, the Project may affect, albeit not replace, other protected trees. It is also possible that the replanted trees may not have the proper position to survive. The EIR’s mitigation measure of tree-replacement does not account for such details; yet it should, as detailed in the CDFW’s comments, including on projects’ impacts on protected coast live oaks, as here.24
Third, “there’s also a carbon cost to tree-planting, meaning that trees have to survive years before they offset that cost. The largest environmental gain comes when trees mature, sometimes decades after they’re planted.”25 Thus, the new trees will not immediately, or maybe even ever, mitigate the impacts associated with removing the already mature trees.

Therefore, should the tree removal take place, it may very well result in significant air quality impacts and biological resources impacts and the proposed new trees cannot properly mitigate the impact on air quality of removing the existing trees. The EIR should adequately disclose, and account for, the Project’s biological and air quality impacts associated, inter alia, with the removal or adverse impact to the trees on site. 22 Id.
23 Bloomberg, The Darker Side of Tree-Planting Pledges (June 30 2021), available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-07-30/what-happens-after-pledges-toplant-millions-of-trees?srnd=citylab. 24 See, CDFW’s 2022 Comment Letter re Tree-Replacement Ratios depending on size of the saplings, esp. pp. 5-7: https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/275332- 1/attachment/0U15QNr0t77eLulU5EZIxSvZxKY3isuAAdh9kOduSlaABCmDmtJeYbItff0 h85Y4kIcj4GgTZUeB-D8C0; see, CDFW’s 2021 Comment Letter re Tree-Replacement Ratios, including for coast live oaks, as well as various mitigation measures, at pp. 7-9 https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/267688-1/attachment/pupolhNfxVnGXGh_y-- NmIniSZdkINKbP7Rd3KhoqNm5askrIKMWHWq4quU921GmM70w16t744YXzFde0 25 Id.
118
Item No. 10B
C. The Project May Have a Significant Impact on Noise
The Project proposes to construct a four-story (4) mixed-use development that encompasses 629,937 gross square feet of building area.26 Thus, the very nature of the Project suggests that the Project could result in a significant noise impact, including both operational and construction noise. As also indicated in the cited and hyperlinked CDFW comments, supra, such noise may also affect the wildlife currently present at the Project site and cause biological impacts.

Furthermore, in the DEIR’s noise analysis for construction noise, the DEIR finds that because the temporary noise level increases from constructin activities would be more than 10 dB, there would be a significant noise impact and that a reduction measure would be necessary.27 The EIR therefore asserts that mitigation measure NOI-1 would be implemented, which would implement a twelve-foot-high (12) barrier at the eastern side of the Project site during the construction phase in order to reduce construction noise levels by the residential uses by 14 dBA to 62 dBA.28 However, this mitigation measure is deficient for several reasons.

First, the assumed elevation (at ground level) of the noise source is not defined.29 This information is crucial because it is key to the performance of the barrier, for example, assuming the barrier sits on the ground at the perimeter of the job site, as the DEIR seems to indicate, it would not adequately mitigate noise sources elevated above the ground level as construction of the building progresses. The mitigation measure must be revised to fully explain how noise barriers would be used to mitigate noise impacts at a minimum of 15 dBA for elevated sources during construction of the two (2) Project structures, with the tallest one being up to four (4) stories tall.30 Likewise, NOI-1 addresses only receivers at ground level but does not address elevated receivers such as the second floor of the neighboring Linden Apartments on Hillcrest Drive, identified by the DEIR as a residential sensitive receptor (R2).

Therefore, the mitigation measure must also be revised to provide protections for receivers elevated above ground level. Accordingly, the Project’s DEIR should be 26 DEIR, supra, at p. 2.0-1. 27 Id. at p. 4.8-7.
28 Id.
29 Id. at p. 4.8-7, 4.8-9. 30 Id. at p. 4.4-1.
119
Item No. 10B
revised and recirculatd to account for the foregoing issues.

D. The Project May Have a Significant Traffic Impact
The very nature of the four-story (4) mixed-use building that will include 333 multifamily residential dwelling units and commercial retail and restaurant space31 and the fact that it is proposed on a long-vacant office site, indicates that the Project may have a significant traffic impact. In fact, according to the DEIR’s Transportation analysis and Traffic, Circulation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”) Study, the Project is anticipated to generate 1,788 average daily trips,32 which further indicates that the Project may have a significant traffic impact.

That the Project may have significant traffic impacts is also suggested by the Applicant’s own statements that its commercial component, including the restaurant/bar is anticipated to be very busy: “restaurant/bar where people working at Amgen headquarters and other nearby companies (Skyworks is just down the street) can get together at lunch and after work.”33
In addition, the Project may have a significant cumulative traffic impact along with other related projects, including but not limited to the ones proposed or built by the same Applicant, such as the Santal development in Thousand Oaks, as mentioned supra. Yet, there is no evidence the DEIR considered a full list of related projects or the Santal project, in its cumulative related projects’ list. DEIR, at 3.0-3—3.0-6 & Figure 3-1.

Even further, the DEIR’s Transportation analysis is deficient as it fails to include any analysis on the Project’s potential impacts during the construction or operation phases of the Project. The DEIR confusingly mentions the level of service (“LOS”) standard to argue no significant impacts would result, albeit it acknowledges that the LOS is not the applicable standard any more. DEIR, at 4.11-6—7. Then again confusingly and misleadingly, the DEIR argues the Project will have less than significant impacts under the VMT and, doing so, it (1) fails to present what the known VMT thresholds of significance are, per the OPR Guidance; and (2) relies on some administrative policies 31 Id. at p. ES-1. 32 Id. at p 4.1-13; Appendix H, 2150 Hillcrest Drive Traffic, Circulation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Study (“Traffic Study”) (Mar. 23, 2023), p. 8. 33 See, Exhibit D
120
Item No. 10B
the City adopted to determine thresholds of significance for VMTs, which the DIER cites to no reference or link to ascertain. DEIR, at 4.11-8—9.

The DEIR fails to disclose the applicable and verifiable standard of determining traffic impacts under the VMT standard. As such, in addition, to achieve the legislative goals of reducing traffic impacts under SB 743, the Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) issued its 2018 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA,34 which recognizes that areas outside of metropolitan planning areas, especially rural counties, have fewer options for reducing VMT. (OPR Advisory, 15-16.) As such, VMT thresholds may be best determined on a case-by-case basis. (Ibid.) Yet, for non-rural areas, the land use project VMT thresholds recommended by OPR for projects in metropolitan planning organization (MPO) areas are listed below:
• For residential projects, OPR recommends a project threshold of 15 percent below the existing VMT per capita, either measured as a regional VMT per capita or as city VMT per capita. The VMT for the residential metric only includes VMT generated by residents, some of which starts and ends outside the area.
• For office projects, OPR recommends a project threshold of 15 percent below the existing regional VMT per employee. The VMT for the office metric only includes VMT generated by workers employed in the area. • For retail projects, OPR recommends a project threshold of any net increase in total area VMT. Another VMT per capita threshold option is total VMT per service population (total of residents and employees). (Ibid. at 12-14.) In addition, according to the OPR’s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, “projects that generate or attract fewer than 110 trips per day generally may be assumed to cause a less-than-significant transportation impact.”35 In light of the foregoing thresholds of significance suggested by OPR, the Project’s – which is both residential and retail of high intensity, including a restaurant/bar on a now vacant office site – generated net 1,788 average daily trips clearly exceeds the threshold of net increase in total area VMT for a retail project and fails to meet the 15 34 See, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (April 2018), pp. 12- 14/pdf pp. 14-16, available at: https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20180416- 743_Technical_Advisory_4.16.18.pdf 35 Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Dec. 2018), p. 10/pdf p. 12, available at https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122- 743_Technical_Advisory.pdf (accessed on May 23, 2023.)
121
Item No. 10B
percent below the existing VMT per capita threshold of significance for a residential building. The aforementioned analysis shows that the City’s VMT analysis and finding of no significant traffic impacts is flawed and omits critical analysis and information suggesting potential traffic impacts.

Therefore, the DEIR’s and its transportation analysis are misleading, deficient and flawed, and must be revised and recirculated to fully account for and mitigate the Project’s individual and cumulative impacts.

E. The Project May Cause Significant Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emission, Water Quality, Noise, and Human Health and Wildlife Impacts There is an acknowledged direct correlation between the increase in traffic impacts and an increase in their associated air quality, greenhouse gas emission (“GHG”), and noise impacts. See e.g., City of Redlands v. County of San Bernardino (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 398, 413, “it is reasonable to assume” that a project enabling physical residential development would have reasonably foreseeable indirect air and other impacts.

As stated in the Office of Planning Research’s (“OPR”) technical advisory in 2018:
“VMT and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction. Senate Bill 32 (Pavley, 2016) requires California to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and Executive Order B-16-12 provides a target of 80 percent below 1990 emissions levels for the transportation sector by 2050. The transportation sector has three major means of reducing GHG emissions: increasing vehicle efficiency, reducing fuel carbon content, and reducing the amount of vehicle travel.”36 Similarly, there is an acknowledged nexus between the increase of traffic and an increase in related air quality, GHG impacts, noise, water/flooding impacts and impacts on human health and natural environment, including wildlife and waterways. As described in the 2018 OPR Technical advisory:
“VMT and Other Impacts to Health and Environment. VMT mitigation also creates substantial benefits (sometimes characterized as “co-benefits” to GHG reduction) in both in the near-term and the long-term. Beyond GHG emissions, increases in VMT also impact human health and the 36 Office of Planning and Research, 2018 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Dec. 2018) at 2, available at https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122- 743_Technical_Advisory.pdf
122
Item No. 10B
natural environment. Human health is impacted as increases in vehicle travel lead to more vehicle crashes, poorer air quality, increases in chronic diseases associated with reduced physical activity, and worse mental health. Increases in vehicle travel also negatively affect other road users, including pedestrians, cyclists, other motorists, and many transit users. The natural environment is impacted as higher VMT leads to more collisions with wildlife and fragments habitat. Additionally, development that leads to more vehicle travel also tends to consume more energy, water, and open space (including farmland and sensitive habitat). This increase in impermeable surfaces raises the flood risk and pollutant transport into waterways.”37
In light of the understated and flawed traffic impact findings, detailed in Section E, supra, the DEIR’s findings about the traffic-related impacts (air quality, noise, greenhouse gas emissions, etc.) are also understated and flawed. Derivatively, the Project may have adverse impacts on human beings.

In addition, in light of the DEIR’s failure to account for the reasonably foreseeable intensity of the restaurant/bar uses, which will be serving many large nearby business structures, schools, and offices as contemplated by the Applicant, the Project may also have significant energy and water impacts. While the DEIR provides that the Project will not have gas appliances for the residences, it is apparent that the more intensive other land uses – i.e., restaurant/bar and others – will be using gas appliances. DEIR, 4.4-6.

In addition, the Project will have a swimming pool, which will be open not only to the residents but also to the public: “The project would also include courtyards throughout the site and a swimming pool. The commercial spaces would be open to the public, as well as the outdoor open spaces proximate to those uses. Additional indoor amenities would be provided to the residents.” DEIR, ES-2. As such, the Project may also have significant energy and water impacts, in light of its amenities being open to the public.

Further, as noted above, the cumulative list of related projects to the Project is inaccurate and omits other related projects, especially by the Project Applicant here. This also suggests that the DEIR’s conclusions about no impacts on air, GHG, and other impacts are flawed and unsupported.
37 Id. at p. 3.
123
Item No. 10B
In sum, the Project may have traffic, air, GHG, energy, water, noise and other impacts, including impacts on human beings and natural environment and the EIR fails to account for or mitigate those.

F. The Project May Have a Cumulative Impact
For purposes of cumulative impacts analysis, CEQA mandates to consider the impacts of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. CEQA Guidelines §§ 15063(b)(1) (prepare an EIR “if the agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial”); 15064(h) (need to consider cumulative impacts of past, other current and “probable future” projects). Even if the Project’s impacts may not be significant, its incremental effects, when added to other past, present, and probable future projects, can be cumulatively significant. CEQA Guidelines §§15065(a)(3), 15130(b)(1)(A), 15355(b).

The DEIR identifies thirteen (13) different cumulative projects within a two-mile (2) radius of the Project Site, with the closest project being just 0.8 miles away at 1875 Newbury Road, Thousand Oaks.38 Yet, the DEIR asserts that the related projects are not reasonably close to the project site to have combined impacts that would make the project’s lack of effects be of concern, and none of these related projects are expected to substantially add to a cumulatively shared impact with the project . . . [and thus, n]o further analysis of cumulative impacts . . . [is] required in the EIR.39 However, the Project, along with the thirteen (13) other related projects collectively contribute to potentially significant impacts on air quality, noise, and traffic congestion in Thousand Oaks, and collectively burden utilities and public services’ ability to adequately serve the Project Site.

In addition, as mentioned above, the DEIR’s related project list is manifestly incomplete; it even omits the Applicant’s own very recent project, of which the City and the Applicant clearly had notice of.
38 DEIR, supra, at p. 3.0-3.
39 Id. at p. 4.13-12.
124
Item No. 10B
Thus, the Project may result in a cumulative impact, and the DEIR’s cumulative impact analysis, based on erroneous assumptions and omissions of all related projects, is flawed as a matter of law, making the DEIR fail as an informational document.

IV. CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, SWMSRCC respectfully requests that the City require the revision and recirculation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA, consistent with the concerns and authority mentioned in this letter.

Sincerely,
____________________________
Stephanie Papayanis
Attorneys for Southwest Mountain
States Regional Council of Carpenters
Attached:

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C); April 22, 2022 Article re “Developer buys Amgen property for $25M” (Exhibit D); July 29, 2022 Article re “A $7,000 apartment? Boulevard builder may break record books” (Exhibit E); and
Current List of the Applicant Latigo Group’s Development Projects (Exhibit F). ____________________________
Stephanie Papayanis
125
Item No. 10B

EXHIBIT A
126
Item No. 10B
1 2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 8, 2021
Mitchell M. Tsai
155 South El Molino, Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101
Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai,
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”) is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts.
‘”‡””‹’•ƒ†
”‡‡Š‘—•‡
ƒ•ƒŽ
—Žƒ–‹‘•
The California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) is a “statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects.”1 CalEEMod quantifies construction-related
emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off-road construction equipment; on-road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on-road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2

The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.3 1 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home. 2 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home. 3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 127
Item No. 10B
2 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled (“VMT”) associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle-class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CalEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction-related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4

Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CalEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below):
“VMTd = Σ(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length i) n Where:
n = Number of land uses being modeled.”5
Furthermore, to calculate the on-road emissions associated with worker trips, CalEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below):
“Emissionspollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant
Where:

Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled
EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions.”6 Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise. ‡ˆƒ—Ž–‘”‡””‹’ƒ”ƒ‡–‡”•ƒ†‘–‡–‹ƒŽ‘
ƒŽ
‹”‡‡“—‹”‡‡–•
As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.7
In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CalEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input projectspecific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.8
The default number of construction-related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the 4 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 23. 6 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 8 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 1, 9. 128
Item No. 10B
3 number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9 Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively.”10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home-to-work vehicle trips.11 The operational home-to-work vehicle trip lengths are:
“[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings” (emphasis added). 12 Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CalEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Minimum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
9 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 11 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14. 12 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21. 13 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 – D-86. 129
Item No. 10B
4 As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location. ”ƒ
–‹
ƒŽ’’Ž‹
ƒ–‹‘‘ˆƒ‘
ƒŽ
‹”‡‡“—‹”‡‡–ƒ†••‘
‹ƒ–‡†
’ƒ
–
To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction-related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan (“Project”) located in the City of Claremont (“City”). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles-South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project’s construction-related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C).

Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 120.77 With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 100.80 % Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project-level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction-related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project’s urbanization level and location.
14 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 130
Item No. 10B
5 ‹•
Žƒ‹‡”
SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
131
Item No. 10B
Location Type Location Name Rural H-W
(miles)
Urban H-W
(miles)
Air Basin Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mountain 16.8 10.8
Air Basin North Central 17.1 12.3
Air Basin North Coast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Northeast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Sacramento 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Salton Sea 14.6 11
Air Basin San Diego 16.8 10.8
Air Basin San Francisco 10.8 10.8
Air Basin San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Central 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Amador County 16.8 10.8
Air District Antelope Valley 16.8 10.8
Air District Bay Area AQMD 10.8 10.8
Air District Butte County 12.54 12.54
Air District Calaveras 16.8 10.8
Air District Colusa County 16.8 10.8
Air District El Dorado 16.8 10.8
Air District Feather River 16.8 10.8
Air District Glenn County 16.8 10.8
Air District Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air District Imperial County 10.2 7.3
Air District Kern County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lassen County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mariposa 16.8 10.8
Air District Mendocino 16.8 10.8
Air District Modoc County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air District Monterey Bay 16.8 10.8
Air District North Coast 16.8 10.8
Air District Northern Sierra 16.8 10.8
Air District Northern 16.8 10.8
Air District Placer County 16.8 10.8
Air District Sacramento 15 10
ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ
132
Item No. 10B
Air District San Diego 16.8 10.8
Air District San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
Air District San Luis Obispo 13 13
Air District Santa Barbara 8.3 8.3
Air District Shasta County 16.8 10.8
Air District Siskiyou County 16.8 10.8
Air District South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Tehama County 16.8 10.8
Air District Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
Air District Ventura County 16.8 10.8
Air District Yolo/Solano 15 10
County Alameda 10.8 10.8
County Alpine 16.8 10.8
County Amador 16.8 10.8
County Butte 12.54 12.54
County Calaveras 16.8 10.8
County Colusa 16.8 10.8
County Contra Costa 10.8 10.8
County Del Norte 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado-Lake 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado- 16.8 10.8
County Fresno 16.8 10.8
County Glenn 16.8 10.8
County Humboldt 16.8 10.8
County Imperial 10.2 7.3
County Inyo 16.8 10.8
County Kern-Mojave 16.8 10.8
County Kern-San 16.8 10.8
County Kings 16.8 10.8
County Lake 16.8 10.8
County Lassen 16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles- 16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles- 19.8 14.7
County Madera 16.8 10.8
County Marin 10.8 10.8
County Mariposa 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Merced 16.8 10.8
County Modoc 16.8 10.8
County Mono 16.8 10.8
County Monterey 16.8 10.8
County Napa 10.8 10.8
133
Item No. 10B
County Nevada 16.8 10.8
County Orange 19.8 14.7
County Placer-Lake 16.8 10.8
County Placer-Mountain 16.8 10.8
County Placer- 16.8 10.8
County Plumas 16.8 10.8
County Riverside- 16.8 10.8
County Riverside- 19.8 14.7
County Riverside-Salton 14.6 11
County Riverside-South 19.8 14.7
County Sacramento 15 10
County San Benito 16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino- 16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino- 19.8 14.7
County San Diego 16.8 10.8
County San Francisco 10.8 10.8
County San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
County San Luis Obispo 13 13
County San Mateo 10.8 10.8
County Santa Barbara- 8.3 8.3
County Santa Barbara- 8.3 8.3
County Santa Clara 10.8 10.8
County Santa Cruz 16.8 10.8
County Shasta 16.8 10.8
County Sierra 16.8 10.8
County Siskiyou 16.8 10.8
County Solano- 15 10
County Solano-San 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-North 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-San 10.8 10.8
County Stanislaus 16.8 10.8
County Sutter 16.8 10.8
County Tehama 16.8 10.8
County Trinity 16.8 10.8
County Tulare 16.8 10.8
County Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
County Ventura 16.8 10.8
County Yolo 15 10
County Yuba 16.8 10.8
Statewide Statewide 16.8 10.8
134
Item No. 10B
Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Mininum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
135
Item No. 10B

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban9
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 33

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2028 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 1 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual $WWDFKPHQW%
136
Item No. 10B
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 2 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 137
Item No. 10B

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 3 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 138
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e003 0.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1969 213.1969 0.0601 0.0000 214.69932022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 2023 0.6148 3.3649 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 5 1,627.529
5 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
5 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e004 0.0325 6.4700e- 003 0.0390 8.6300e- 003 6.0400e- 003 0.0147 0.0000 52.9078 52.9078 8.0200e- 003 0.0000 53.1082 Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 4 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 139
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e003 0.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1967 213.1967 0.0601 0.0000 214.69912022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 2023 0.6148 3.3648 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 1 1,627.529
1 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
1 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e004 0.0325 6.4700e- 003 0.0390 8.6300e- 003 6.0400e- 003 0.0147 0.0000 52.9077 52.9077 8.0200e- 003 0.0000 53.1082 Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4103 1.41032 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3613 1.36133 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1985 1.19854 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1921 1.19215 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1918 1.19186 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0774 1.07747 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.0320 1.03208 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 1.0260 1.0260 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 5 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 140
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073 2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 1.0265 1.0265
10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8857 2.885711 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6207 1.6207 Highest 2.8857 2.8857
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 6 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 141
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073 2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 7 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 142
Item No. 10B
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 302 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 203 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 454 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 5005 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 356 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating OffRoad Equipment
– sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 8 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 143
Item No. 10B
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 9 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 144
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e003 0.0000 7.5100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 003 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 10 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 145
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e003 0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e- 004 3.9400e- 003 1.9000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 1.0800e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e004 7.5000e- 004 8.5100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4900e- 003 6.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2267 Total 2.9000e003 0.0641 0.0233 2.0000e- 004 6.4100e- 003 2.1000e- 004 6.6200e- 003 1.7300e- 003 2.0000e- 004 1.9300e- 003 0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e- 003 0.0000 19.7136 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e003 0.0000 7.5100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 003 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 11 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 146
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e003 0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e- 004 3.9400e- 003 1.9000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 1.0800e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e004 7.5000e- 004 8.5100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4900e- 003 6.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2267 Total 2.9000e003 0.0641 0.0233 2.0000e- 004 6.4100e- 003 2.1000e- 004 6.6200e- 003 1.7300e- 003 2.0000e- 004 1.9300e- 003 0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e- 003 0.0000 19.7136 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 12 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 147
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e004 6.0000e- 004 6.8100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7814 Total 7.7000e004 6.0000e- 004 6.8100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7814 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 13 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 148
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e004 6.0000e- 004 6.8100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7814 Total 7.7000e004 6.0000e- 004 6.8100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 5.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7814 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 14 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 149
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e003 1.2700e- 003 0.0144 4.0000e- 005 4.1600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 003 1.1100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.7607 Total 1.6400e003 1.2700e- 003 0.0144 4.0000e- 005 4.1600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 003 1.1100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.7607 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 15 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 150
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e003 1.2700e- 003 0.0144 4.0000e- 005 4.1600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 003 1.1100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.7607 Total 1.6400e003 1.2700e- 003 0.0144 4.0000e- 005 4.1600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 003 1.1100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.7607 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 5.7200e- 003 5.7200e- 003 5.2600e- 003 5.2600e- 003 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 0.0807 5.7200e- 003 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 003 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 16 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 151
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6684 Total 2.8000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6684 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 5.7200e- 003 5.7200e- 003 5.2600e- 003 5.2600e- 003 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 0.0807 5.7200e- 003 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 003 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 17 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 152
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6684 Total 2.8000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6684 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 18 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 153
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e003 0.1140 3.1800e- 003 0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e- 003 0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e003 1.1192 0.2949 8.1700e- 003 0.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 19 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 154
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e003 0.1140 3.1800e- 003 0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e- 003 0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e003 1.1192 0.2949 8.1700e- 003 0.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 20 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 155
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e003 0.1113 1.4600e- 003 0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e- 003 0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e003 1.0924 0.2879 7.7400e- 003 0.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e003 1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e- 003 0.3292 0.0000 1,327.336 9 1,327.336 9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 21 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 156
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e003 0.1113 1.4600e- 003 0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e- 003 0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e003 1.0924 0.2879 7.7400e- 003 0.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e003 1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e- 003 0.3292 0.0000 1,327.336 9 1,327.336 9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 22 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 157
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 3.1200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8968 Total 3.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 3.1200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8968 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 23 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 158
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 3.1200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8968 Total 3.7000e004 2.7000e- 004 3.1200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8968 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 24 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 159
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e004 4.1000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.8100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4706 Total 5.9000e004 4.1000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.8100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4706 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 25 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 160
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e004 4.1000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.8100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4706 Total 5.9000e004 4.1000e- 004 4.9200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.8100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4706 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e003 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 26 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 161
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e003 0.0835 2.8000e- 004 0.0307 2.3000e- 004 0.0309 8.1500e- 003 2.2000e- 004 8.3700e- 003 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 24.9558 Total 0.0101 6.9900e003 0.0835 2.8000e- 004 0.0307 2.3000e- 004 0.0309 8.1500e- 003 2.2000e- 004 8.3700e- 003 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 24.9558 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e003 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 27 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 162
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e003 0.0835 2.8000e- 004 0.0307 2.3000e- 004 0.0309 8.1500e- 003 2.2000e- 004 8.3700e- 003 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 24.9558 Total 0.0101 6.9900e003 0.0835 2.8000e- 004 0.0307 2.3000e- 004 0.0309 8.1500e- 003 2.2000e- 004 8.3700e- 003 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 24.9558 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 28 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 163
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 29 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 164
Item No. 10B
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
R t t)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix5.0 Energy Detail5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 30 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 165
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426 7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426 7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 31 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 166
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e003 0.0188 8.0100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 21.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e003 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e003 0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e- 004 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 25.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e003 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003 8.1300e- 003 445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e003 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 004 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 003 1.7000e- 003 93.4557 Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e003 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 004 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 003 1.8100e- 003 99.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e004 4.5000e- 003 3.7800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 4.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426 8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 32 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 167
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e003 0.0188 8.0100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 21.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e003 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e003 0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e- 004 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 25.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e003 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003 8.1300e- 003 445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e003 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 004 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 003 1.7000e- 003 93.4557 Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e003 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 004 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 003 1.8100e- 003 99.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e004 4.5000e- 003 3.7800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 4.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426 8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 33 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 168
Item No. 10B

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e003 2.9000e- 004 33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e003 1.5900e- 003 186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003 508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e003 1.5000e- 003 175.9672 Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e003 9.6000e- 004 112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e003 2.0600e- 003 241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 34 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 169
Item No. 10B

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e003 2.9000e- 004 33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e003 1.5900e- 003 186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003 508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e003 1.5000e- 003 175.9672 Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e003 9.6000e- 004 112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e003 2.0600e- 003 241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 35 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 170
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e003 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003 3.7400e- 003 205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e004 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 36 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 171
Item No. 10B

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e003 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003 3.7400e- 003 205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e004 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 37 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 172
Item No. 10B
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 38 of 44
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 173
Item No. 10B

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e003 12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e003 61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e003 62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e003 7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e003 13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e003 31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 39 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 174
Item No. 10B

7.2 Water by Land Use

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e003 12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e003 61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e003 62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e003 7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e003 13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e003 31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 40 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 175
Item No. 10B
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 41 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 176
Item No. 10B

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 42 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 177
Item No. 10B

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 43 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 178
Item No. 10B
Boilers

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Page 44 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 179
Item No. 10B

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban9
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 33

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2028 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 180
Item No. 10B
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 181
Item No. 10B

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 182
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
21 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 183
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
20 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 184
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 185
Item No. 10B

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 302 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 203 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 454 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 5005 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 356 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 186
Item No. 10B
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 187
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 188
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e003 0.1677 1.3500e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e- 003 0.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e- 003 170.9413 Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 189
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e003 0.1677 1.3500e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e- 003 0.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e- 003 170.9413 Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 190
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 003 205.1296 Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 003 205.1296 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 191
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 003 205.1296 Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 003 205.1296 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 192
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 003 227.9217 Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 003 227.9217 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 193
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 003 227.9217 Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 003 227.9217 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 194
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 003 219.8941 Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 003 219.8941 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 195
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 003 219.8941 Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 003 219.8941 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 196
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 197
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 198
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 199
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 200
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 003 158.8748 Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 003 158.8748 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 201
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 003 158.8748 Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 003 158.8748 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 202
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 003 153.9458 Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 003 153.9458 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 203
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 003 153.9458 Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 003 153.9458 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 204
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 205
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 206
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 207
Item No. 10B
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
R t t)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix5.0 Energy Detail5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 208
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 209
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 210
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 211
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e003 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 212
Item No. 10B

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e003 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 213
Item No. 10B
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Page 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 214
Item No. 10B

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban9
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 33

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2028 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 215
Item No. 10B
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 216
Item No. 10B

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 217
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 218
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 219
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 220
Item No. 10B

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 302 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 203 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 454 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 5005 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 356 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 221
Item No. 10B
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 222
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 223
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e003 0.1677 1.3500e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e- 003 0.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e- 003 160.9560 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 224
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e003 0.1677 1.3500e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e- 003 0.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e- 003 160.9560 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 225
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 003 193.1472 Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 003 193.1472 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 226
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 003 193.1472 Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e003 0.2012 1.6300e- 003 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 003 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 003 193.1472 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 227
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 003 214.6080 Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 003 214.6080 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 228
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 003 214.6080 Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e003 0.2236 1.8100e- 003 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 003 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 003 214.6080 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 229
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 003 207.0563 Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 003 207.0563 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 230
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 003 207.0563 Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e003 0.2236 1.7500e- 003 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 003 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 003 207.0563 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 231
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 232
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 233
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 234
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 235
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 003 149.6043 Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 003 149.6043 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 236
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 003 149.6043 Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e003 0.1677 1.2800e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 003 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 003 149.6043 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 237
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 003 144.9587 Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 003 144.9587 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 238
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 003 144.9587 Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e003 0.1677 1.2600e- 003 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 003 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 003 144.9587 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 239
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 240
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 241
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 242
Item No. 10B
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
R t t)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix5.0 Energy Detail5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 243
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 244
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 245
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 246
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e003 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 247
Item No. 10B

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e003 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 248
Item No. 10B
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Page 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 249
Item No. 10B

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban9
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 33

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2028 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 1 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 250
Item No. 10B
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 2 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 251
Item No. 10B

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 3 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 252
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1704 1.8234 1.1577 2.3800e003 0.4141 0.0817 0.4958 0.1788 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 210.7654 210.7654 0.0600 0.0000 212.26612022 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 4 1,418.655
4 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
5 2023 0.5190 3.2850 4.7678 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 0.9468 0.2283 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 1,342.441 2 1,342.441
2 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.229
1 2024 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.0000e004 0.0221 6.3900e- 003 0.0285 5.8700e- 003 5.9700e- 003 0.0118 0.0000 44.6355 44.6355 7.8300e- 003 0.0000 44.8311 Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 4 1,418.655
4 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
5 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 4 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 253
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1704 1.8234 1.1577 2.3800e003 0.4141 0.0817 0.4958 0.1788 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 210.7651 210.7651 0.0600 0.0000 212.26582022 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 0 1,418.655
0 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
1 2023 0.5190 3.2850 4.7678 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 0.9468 0.2283 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 1,342.440 9 1,342.440
9 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.228
7 2024 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.0000e004 0.0221 6.3900e- 003 0.0285 5.8700e- 003 5.9700e- 003 0.0118 0.0000 44.6354 44.6354 7.8300e- 003 0.0000 44.8311 Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 0 1,418.655
0 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
1 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4091 1.40912 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3329 1.33293 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1499 1.14994 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1457 1.14575 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1415 1.14156 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0278 1.02787 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.9868 0.98688 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.9831 0.9831 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 5 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 254
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073 2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.9798 0.9798
10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8757 2.875711 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6188 1.6188 Highest 2.8757 2.8757
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 6 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 255
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073 2 3,896.073 2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 7 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 256
Item No. 10B
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 302 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 203 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 454 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 5005 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 356 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating OffRoad Equipment
– sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 8 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 257
Item No. 10B
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 9 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 258
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e003 0.0000 7.5100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 003 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 10 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 259
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e003 0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e- 004 3.9400e- 003 1.9000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 1.0800e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e004 5.3000e- 004 6.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6900e- 003 4.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.5281 1.5281 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5293 Total 2.6500e003 0.0639 0.0209 2.0000e- 004 5.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 004 5.8200e- 003 1.5300e- 003 1.9000e- 004 1.7200e- 003 0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 19.0161 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e003 0.0000 7.5100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e004 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 003 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 11 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 260
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e003 0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e- 004 3.9400e- 003 1.9000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 1.0800e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 17.4869 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e004 5.3000e- 004 6.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6900e- 003 4.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.5281 1.5281 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5293 Total 2.6500e003 0.0639 0.0209 2.0000e- 004 5.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 004 5.8200e- 003 1.5300e- 003 1.9000e- 004 1.7200e- 003 0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e- 003 0.0000 19.0161 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 12 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 261
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e004 4.3000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 3.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2234 Total 5.8000e004 4.3000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 3.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2234 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e004 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 13 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 262
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e004 4.3000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 3.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2234 Total 5.8000e004 4.3000e- 004 4.8700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3500e- 003 3.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2234 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 14 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 263
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2200e003 9.0000e- 004 0.0103 3.0000e- 005 2.8300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.5828 Total 1.2200e003 9.0000e- 004 0.0103 3.0000e- 005 2.8300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.5828 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e003 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 15 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 264
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2200e003 9.0000e- 004 0.0103 3.0000e- 005 2.8300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.5828 Total 1.2200e003 9.0000e- 004 0.0103 3.0000e- 005 2.8300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8600e- 003 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.5828 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 5.7200e- 003 5.7200e- 003 5.2600e- 003 5.2600e- 003 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 0.0807 5.7200e- 003 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 003 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 16 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 265
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e004 1.5000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4590 Total 2.1000e004 1.5000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4590 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 5.7200e- 003 5.7200e- 003 5.2600e- 003 5.2600e- 003 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e004 0.0807 5.7200e- 003 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 003 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 19.2414 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 17 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 266
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e004 1.5000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4590 Total 2.1000e004 1.5000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4590 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 18 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 267
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e003 0.1140 3.1800e- 003 0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e- 003 0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.3051 0.2164 2.5233 7.3500e003 0.7557 6.2300e- 003 0.7619 0.2007 5.7400e- 003 0.2065 0.0000 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 0.0000 664.4604 Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e003 0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e- 003 0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1 1,105.977 1 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103 9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e003 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 19 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 268
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e003 0.1140 3.1800e- 003 0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e- 003 0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435 Worker 0.3051 0.2164 2.5233 7.3500e003 0.7557 6.2300e- 003 0.7619 0.2007 5.7400e- 003 0.2065 0.0000 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 0.0000 664.4604 Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e003 0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e- 003 0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1 1,105.977 1 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103 9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 20 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 269
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e003 0.1113 1.4600e- 003 0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e- 003 0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.2795 0.1910 2.2635 6.9100e003 0.7377 5.9100e- 003 0.7436 0.1960 5.4500e- 003 0.2014 0.0000 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 0.0000 624.9466 Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e003 0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e- 003 0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 4 1,042.529 4 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e003 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 21 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 270
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e003 0.1113 1.4600e- 003 0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e- 003 0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624 Worker 0.2795 0.1910 2.2635 6.9100e003 0.7377 5.9100e- 003 0.7436 0.1960 5.4500e- 003 0.2014 0.0000 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 0.0000 624.9466 Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e003 0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e- 003 0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 4 1,042.529 4 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 22 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 271
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e004 1.9000e- 004 2.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6160 Total 2.8000e004 1.9000e- 004 2.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6160 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e003 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 004 3.3200e- 003 3.3200e- 003 3.0500e- 003 3.0500e- 003 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 003 0.0000 13.1227 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 23 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 272
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e004 1.9000e- 004 2.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6160 Total 2.8000e004 1.9000e- 004 2.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6160 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 24 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 273
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e004 2.9000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2400e- 003 3.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0100 Total 4.4000e004 2.9000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2400e- 003 3.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0100 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e004 5.1500e- 003 5.1500e- 003 4.7400e- 003 4.7400e- 003 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 003 0.0000 22.2073 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 25 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 274
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e004 2.9000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2400e- 003 3.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0100 Total 4.4000e004 2.9000e- 004 3.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2400e- 003 3.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0100 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e003 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 26 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 275
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.4800e003 4.9300e- 003 0.0596 1.9000e- 004 0.0209 1.6000e- 004 0.0211 5.5500e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.7000e- 003 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 17.1394 Total 7.4800e003 4.9300e- 003 0.0596 1.9000e- 004 0.0209 1.6000e- 004 0.0211 5.5500e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.7000e- 003 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 17.1394 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e003 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.4745 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 27 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 276
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.4800e003 4.9300e- 003 0.0596 1.9000e- 004 0.0209 1.6000e- 004 0.0211 5.5500e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.7000e- 003 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 17.1394 Total 7.4800e003 4.9300e- 003 0.0596 1.9000e- 004 0.0209 1.6000e- 004 0.0211 5.5500e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.7000e- 003 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 17.1394 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 28 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 277
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 29 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 278
Item No. 10B
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
R t t)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix5.0 Energy Detail5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 30 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 279
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426 7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 7 1,383.426 7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 31 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 280
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e003 0.0188 8.0100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 21.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e003 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e003 0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e- 004 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 25.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e003 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003 8.1300e- 003 445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e003 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 004 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 003 1.7000e- 003 93.4557 Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e003 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 004 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 003 1.8100e- 003 99.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e004 4.5000e- 003 3.7800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 4.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426 8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 32 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 281
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e003 0.0188 8.0100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 21.9284 Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e003 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e003 0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e- 004 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 25.1468 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e003 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003 8.1300e- 003 445.9468 Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e003 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 004 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 6.4900e- 003 0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 003 1.7000e- 003 93.4557 Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e003 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 004 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 6.8800e- 003 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 003 1.8100e- 003 99.0993 Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e004 4.5000e- 003 3.7800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 4.9301 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e003 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 8 1,383.426 8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 33 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 282
Item No. 10B

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e003 2.9000e- 004 33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e003 1.5900e- 003 186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003 508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e003 1.5000e- 003 175.9672 Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e003 9.6000e- 004 112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e003 2.0600e- 003 241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 34 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 283
Item No. 10B

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e003 2.9000e- 004 33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e003 1.5900e- 003 186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e003 508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e003 1.5000e- 003 175.9672 Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e003 9.6000e- 004 112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e003 2.0600e- 003 241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 35 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 284
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e003 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003 3.7400e- 003 205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e004 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 36 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 285
Item No. 10B

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e003 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003 3.7400e- 003 205.3295 Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e004 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003 222.5835 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 37 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 286
Item No. 10B
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Unmitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 38 of 44
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 287
Item No. 10B

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e003 12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e003 61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e003 62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e003 7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e003 13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e003 31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 39 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 288
Item No. 10B

7.2 Water by Land Use

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e003 12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e003 61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e003 62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e003 7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e003 13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e003 31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 40 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 289
Item No. 10B
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 41 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 290
Item No. 10B

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 42 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 291
Item No. 10B

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 43 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 292
Item No. 10B
Boilers

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Page 44 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 293
Item No. 10B

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban9
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 33

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2028 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 294
Item No. 10B
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 295
Item No. 10B

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 296
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,163.416 6 6,163.416
6 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103
9 2022 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 2023 4.1534 25.7658 38.7457 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 7.7679 1.8799 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 12,150.48 90 12,150.48
90 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46
15 2024 237.0219 9.5478 14.9642 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,313.180 8 2,313.180
8 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095
6 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 297
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,163.416 6 6,163.416
6 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103
9 2022 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 2023 4.1534 25.7658 38.7457 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 7.7679 1.8799 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 12,150.48 90 12,150.48
90 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46
15 2024 237.0219 9.5478 14.9642 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,313.180 8 2,313.180
8 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095
5 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 298
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 299
Item No. 10B

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 302 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 203 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 454 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 5005 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 356 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 300
Item No. 10B
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 301
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 302
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e003 0.1141 9.5000e- 004 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 004 0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- 003 117.3678 Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.1163 1,409.521 2 1,409.521
2 0.0912 1,411.801
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 303
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e003 0.1141 9.5000e- 004 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 004 0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- 003 117.3678 Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.1163 1,409.521 2 1,409.521
2 0.0912 1,411.801
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 304
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 003 140.8414 Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 003 140.8414 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 305
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 003 140.8414 Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 003 140.8414 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 306
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 003 156.4904 Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 003 156.4904 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 307
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 003 156.4904 Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 003 156.4904 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 308
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 003 150.9813 Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 003 150.9813 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 309
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 003 150.9813 Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 003 150.9813 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 310
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 5 6,042.558
5 0.1697 6,046.800
0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 1.9490 9,939.106 7 9,939.106
7 0.3933 9,948.938
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 311
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 5 6,042.558
5 0.1697 6,046.800
0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 1.9490 9,939.106 7 9,939.106
7 0.3933 9,948.938
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 312
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 8 5,821.402
8 0.1529 5,825.225
4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 0 9,595.279
0 0.3511 9,604.055
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 313
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 8 5,821.402
8 0.1529 5,825.225
4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 0 9,595.279
0 0.3511 9,604.055
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 314
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 003 109.0866 Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 003 109.0866 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 315
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 003 109.0866 Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 003 109.0866 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 316
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 003 105.6992 Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 003 105.6992 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 317
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 003 105.6992 Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 003 105.6992 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 318
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,126.758 3 1,126.758 3 0.0280 1,127.458 3 Total 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,126.758 3 1,126.758 3 0.0280 1,127.458 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 319
Item No. 10B

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,126.758 3 1,126.758 3 0.0280 1,127.458 3 Total 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e003 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 003 0.3315 1,126.758 3 1,126.758 3 0.0280 1,127.458 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 320
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 321
Item No. 10B
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
R t t)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix5.0 Energy Detail5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 322
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 323
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 324
Item No. 10B

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e004 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 8.3400e- 003 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 003 2.4100e- 003 132.4486 Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e004 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 9.5600e- 003 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 003 2.7700e- 003 151.8884 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e003 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e003 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e003 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 004 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 29.7778 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 325
Item No. 10B
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e003 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 326
Item No. 10B

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e003 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 327
Item No. 10B
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Page 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 328
Item No. 10B

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban9
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 33

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Southern California Edison
2028 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 329
Item No. 10B
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 330
Item No. 10B

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 331
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2621 46.4460 31.4068 0.0635 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,154.337 7 6,154.337
7 1.9472 0.0000 6,203.018
6 2022 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 2023 4.3939 25.8648 37.5031 0.1162 7.0088 0.7598 7.7685 1.8799 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 11,710.40 80 11,710.40
80 0.9617 0.0000 11,734.44
97 2024 237.0656 9.5503 14.9372 0.0238 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,307.051 7 2,307.051
7 0.7164 0.0000 2,324.962
7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 332
Item No. 10B

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2621 46.4460 31.4068 0.0635 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,154.337 7 6,154.337
7 1.9472 0.0000 6,203.018
6 2022 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 2023 4.3939 25.8648 37.5031 0.1162 7.0088 0.7598 7.7685 1.8799 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 11,710.40 80 11,710.40
80 0.9617 0.0000 11,734.44
97 2024 237.0656 9.5503 14.9372 0.0238 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,307.051 7 2,307.051
7 0.7164 0.0000 2,324.962
7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 333
Item No. 10B

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 334
Item No. 10B

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 302 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 203 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 454 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 5005 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 356 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 335
Item No. 10B
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 336
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 337
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0346 0.3963 1.1100e003 0.1141 9.5000e- 004 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 004 0.0311 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- 003 110.5539 Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.1165 1,380.326 2 1,380.326
2 0.0941 1,382.679
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 338
Item No. 10B

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0346 0.3963 1.1100e003 0.1141 9.5000e- 004 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 004 0.0311 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- 003 110.5539 Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.1165 1,380.326 2 1,380.326
2 0.0941 1,382.679
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 339
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 003 132.6646 Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 003 132.6646 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 340
Item No. 10B

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 003 132.6646 Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e003 0.1369 1.1400e- 003 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 003 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 003 132.6646 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 341
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 003 147.4051 Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 003 147.4051 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 342
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 003 147.4051 Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e003 0.1521 1.2700e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 003 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 003 147.4051 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 343
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e- 003 142.2207 Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e- 003 142.2207 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 344
Item No. 10B

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e- 003 142.2207 Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e003 0.1521 1.2300e- 003 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 003 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e- 003 142.2207 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 345
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 5,691.935 4 5,691.935
4 0.1602 5,695.940
8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 4 9,481.010
4 0.3984 9,490.969
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 346
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 5,691.935 4 5,691.935
4 0.1602 5,695.940
8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 4 9,481.010
4 0.3984 9,490.969
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 347
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 4 5,483.797
4 0.1442 5,487.402
0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 1.9356 9,155.198 1 9,155.198
1 0.3538 9,164.043
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 348
Item No. 10B

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 4 5,483.797
4 0.1442 5,487.402
0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 1.9356 9,155.198 1 9,155.198
1 0.3538 9,164.043
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 349
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 350
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e003 0.1141 9.0000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 004 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 003 102.7603 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 351
Item No. 10B

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 003 99.5663 Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e003 0.1141 8.8000e- 004 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 004 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 003 99.5663 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Page 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 352
Item No. 10B