Tracy City Council
August 15, 2023

Install new Zone 2 pipeline in Lammers Rd
between Valpico Rd and Schulte Rd.

Equip wells with
ammonia addition
O ld Rive
r
C
al if orni a
A qu ed uc t
D e l t a - M e n d o t a C a n a l

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

BIRD RD

LOVELY RD

LAMMERS RD

CHRISMAN RD

NAGLEE RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

BETHANY RD

MIDDLE RD

VON SOSTEN RD

AHERN RD

REEVE RD

DURHAM FERRY RD

SCHULTE RD
12"
16" 16"
12"
16"
12"
12"
20"
12"
16"
12"
12"
10"
12"
12"
12"
12"
20"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
16"16"
16"
12"
12"
10"
10"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16"
12"
16"
12"
16"
12"
12"
12"
16"
12"12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
16"16"
12"
12"
10"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"12"
12"
10"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16"
16"
16"
16"
16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
10"
16"
12"
14"
12"
16"
16"
12"
20"
12"
16"
16"
12"
12"
16"
12"
12"
16"
12"
12"
16"
16"
24"
12"
12"
12"
16"
12"
16"
12"
12"
16"
12"
12"
20"
20"
20"
12"
16"
20"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16"
12"
0 5,0002,500
Scale in Feet
Figure 8-12
Proposed Future Water System
Recommended Improvements
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 3/21/2022 1:39:34 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_8-12 System Improvements.mxd : cpittner Notes:

1. See Figure 8-13 for a detailed view of
recommended 2025 pipeline CIP.

2. Install a PRV on any service connection
with pressures exceeding 80 psi.

3. Install SCADA system monitoring of flows
and pressures at each new facility.

4. Install on-site backup power at each new
pumping facility.

5. Pipelines of less than 12-inches in diameter
are shown but not labeled.

Symbology
Proposed Buildout Facilities
XW Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
!( Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
¼ÐÚ Buildout Booster Pump Station
7n Buildout Groundwater Well
UT Buildout Storage Tank
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Facilities
!( 2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Existing System Facilities
XW Existing Pressure Regulating Station
!( Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
¼ÐÚ Existing Booster Pump Station
7n Existing Groundwater Well
UT Existing Storage Tank
3Q John Jones Water Treatment Plant
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
Pressure Zone
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Ellis Reduced Zone
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
3Q
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
7n
7n
Future
Clearwell #3
Z5 BPS
Additional
Z3 pumps
Additional Z4
pump at
buildout
JJWTP Buildout Facilities
16"
8"
12"
12"
30" 24"
20"
16"
JJWTP (10 mgd expansion to
40 mgd treatment capacity).

Figure 8-13
2025 System Recommended
Pipeline CIP
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 3/19/2020 4:29:01 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_8-13_2025_Sys_Improvements.mxd : rchu Well 8
Lewis Manor

ELEVENTH ST

TRACY BL

BESSIE AV

TWELFTH ST

TENTH ST

SIXTH ST
CUM

BERLAND
DR

ROOSEVELT AV

FOREST HILLS DR
MAY AL

BEECHNUT AV

TAFT AV

GALLERY DR

PAYNE AL

WINDELER AV

PALM CI

NINTH ST
10"
4"
4" 4"
6"
8"
12"
6"
6"
36"
10"
8"
12"
8"
10"10"
8"
6"
6"
12"
6"
12"
6" 8"
6"
12"
6"
8"
8"
12" 6"
6" 6"
6"
6"10"
12"
6"
6" 6"
8"
12"
12"
6"
10"
36"
12"
8"
24"
18"
24"
24"
24"
0 200100
Scale in Feet
Symbology
Recommended 2025 Improvement
Existing Pipeline
Groundwater Well
Notes:

1. See Figure 8-12 for the location of the
recommended improvements.

Chapter 8
Future Potable Water System Evaluation

8-44 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

8.6.1.2 Interconnections
• Install two new mainline PRVs before the transmission main in Schulte Road is re- zoned to Zone 3.
• Install an individual PRV on any water service connection with a static pressure exceeding 80 psi.

8.6.1.3 Re-Zoning
• Re-zone the existing transmission mains in Lammers Road, Schulte Road, and Hansen Road from Zone 2 to Zone 3 as described in Appendix D.

8.6.1.4 Groundwater Wells
• Provide ammonia addition for existing City wells (Lincoln Well, Lewis Manor Well, Park & Ride Well and Ball Park Well) (as noted below under Buildout System Improvements, all future wells are also recommended to be equipped with ammonia addition).
• A feasibility study is recommended to develop an implementation plan for future ASR expansion (see additional discussion in Chapter 5).

8.6.2 Buildout System Improvements
The recommended backbone potable water system improvements required to serve buildout potable water demands are summarized below.

8.6.2.1 Storage Facilities
Planning and design of these new storage facilities should be conducted so that the proposed facilities are constructed and operational in time to serve their respective service areas (e.g., Westside, Zone 5 or Zone 6). Because of the additional operationa l flexibility that Clearwell #3 would provide, it is recommended that Clearwell #3 be constructed as soon as possible. As noted above, no additional storage facilities are required by 2025, but it is recommended that Clearwell #3 be constructed by no later than 2030.

Note: Because the actual dimensions of each proposed storage facility have not been determined, the storage facility sizes below do not include dead and freeboard storage requirements, which will be determined during design.
• Westside Tank: Install a new storage tank with a minimum active storage capacity of

1.0 MG.
• JJWTP Clearwell #3: Install a new clearwell at the JJWTP with a minimum active storage capacity of 1.0 MG.
• Zone 5 Tank: Install a new storage tank with a minimum active storage capacity of

3.2 MG. Sizing of this tank should be confirmed before development of Zone 5 begins.

Chapter 8
Future Potable Water System Evaluation

8-45 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
• Zone 6 Tank: Install a new storage tank with a minimum active storage capacity of

1.1 MG. Sizing of this tank should be confirmed before development of Zone 6 begins.

8.6.2.2 Groundwater Wells
Planning and design of these new groundwater wells should be phased so that the City’s ASR Program can be expanded as needed to meet the City’s water supply need s, particularly in dry years. As described in Chapter 5, a feasibility study for the expansion of the City’s ASR Program is recommended, and is included above with the recommended 2025 System Improvements, to develop an implementation plan for ASR expansion.
• Westside ASR Well: Install a new ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,500 gpm and equipped with ammonia addition.
• Wainwright ASR Well: Install a new ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,500 gpm and equipped with ammonia addition. • Larsen Park ASR Well: Install a new ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,500 gpm and equipped with ammonia addition. • Ellis ASR Well: Install a new ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 1,000 gpm and equipped with ammonia addition.

8.6.2.3 Booster Pumping Facilities
Planning and design of these new booster pumping facilities should be coordinated with the construction of other related facilities (e.g., associated storage tanks) and the timing of new development. As of early 2022, the Zone 5 BPS design is complete. • JJWTP: Increase the firm treated surface water pumping capacity at the JJWTP to meet buildout maximum day water demands.
— Zone 3 BPS: Install additional Zone 3 booster pumps with a minimum pumping capacity of 1,500 gpm.
— Zone 5 BPS: Install a new Zone 5 booster pump station with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,410 gpm.
• Zone 6 BPS: Install a new booster pump station with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 550 gpm (sizing of this pump station should be confirmed before development of Zone 6 begins).
• Westside Tank: Install a new Zone 1 booster pump station with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 4,500 gpm.
• Westside Tank: Install a new Zone 2 booster pump station with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,400 gpm.

Chapter 8
Future Potable Water System Evaluation
8-46 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

8.6.2.4 Pipelines
Planning and design of these new pipelines should be coordinated with the timing of new development.
• To serve buildout water demands, install approximately 308,270 linear feet of new pipelines (in addition to the proposed 2025 pipelines) ranging in diameter from 12 to 30 inches as shown on Figure 8-12.
• To serve buildout water demands, install additional new pipelines of 10 inches in diameter or less within individual development projects; the length of small diameter pipelines needed to serve buildout water demands is unknown, as most buildout development areas do not have detailed water system infrastructure plans prepared.

8.6.2.5 Interconnections
Planning and design of these new interconnections should be coordinated with the timing of new development in the respective pressure zones.
• Install the following interconnections between pressure zones to provide supply during peak demands and/or emergency conditions:
— Westside PRS (from Zone 2 into Zone 1)
— Ellis PRV #3 (from Zone 3 into Ellis Reduced Zone)
— Avenues PRV (from Ellis Reduced Zone into Zone 2)
— Zone 4 PRV (from Zone 5 into Zone 4)
— Two (2) Zone 5 PRVs (from Zone 6 into Zone 5)
— Install six new mainline PRVs before the Plan C area is re-zoned to Zone 3 (to be funded through Plan C funds)
• Install an individual PRV on any water service connection with a static pressure exceeding 80 psi.

8.6.2.6 Re-Zoning
Planning and design of this rezoning should be coordinated with the timing of the new Zone 3 pipeline from the JJWTP.
• Re-zone the Plan C area from Zone 2 to Zone 3 (to be funded through Plan C funds)

8.6.2.7 SCADA System/Backup Power
Planning and design of the recommended SCADA system improvements and backup power should be prioritized and completed as soon as possible, as these improvements will improve operational flexibility and reliability.
• Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at PRS #1-#6 to provide operators with additional understanding and flexibility in system operations.

Chapter 8
Future Potable Water System Evaluation

8-47 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
• Add remote operation of Well 8 from the SCADA system to provide additional operational flexibility.
• Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at each new water supply facility to provide operators with real-time system data and flexibility in system operations.
• Install on-site backup power to any proposed buildout system pumping facility to improve supply reliability.

8.6.2.8 JJWTP Expansion
A future additional 10 mgd expansion of the JJWTP (for a total treatment capacity of 40 mgd) is recommended to provide the City with additional water treatment capacity , as well as operational flexibility and reliability, if the use of groundwater supplies needs to be limited or if there is a supply outag e from South County Water Supply Project. The expansion would also include a new administration/maintenance building to accommodate future staffing needs and maintenance activities.

It is recommended that the JJWTP expansion be constructed by no later than 2030, in coordination with the new JJWTP Clearwell #3.

8.6.2.9 Participation in Phase 2 Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project As described in Chapter 5, the City’s participation in the Phase 2 Los Vaqueros Reservo ir Expansion Project would increase the City’s water supply reliability by providing storage of supplies for use in dry years. The estimated cost for 5,000 acre-feet of storage for the City will be approximately $10 million plus an additional $1.5 million for implementation and will be shared by existing rate payers and new development. In October 2021, the Tracy City Council authorized staff to initiate the process to participate in the project and authorized the City Manager to execute the project activity agreement.

8.6.2.10 Water Master Plan Updates
Regular updates of this Citywide Water System Master Plan are recommended to evaluate potable water and recycled water infrastructure needs to reflect any changes in future development plans, water use trends and pat terns, and water supply availability and reliability, as well as new regulations and operational needs as new potable water and recycled water system infrastructure is constructed. It is recommended that updates be prepared at least once every 10 years, or more often if changing conditions warrant more frequent updates. For purposes of this Citywide Water System Master Plan Update, three future updates are planned.

9-1 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
CHAPTER 9
Recycled Water System Evaluation

9.1 OVERVIEW
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the City’s existing recycled water system and the recommended future recycled water system at buildout of the City’s SOI. The recycled water infrastructure recommended in this chapter is based on the adopted water use and peaking factors described in Chapter 4 and system performance criteria described in Chapter 6 of this Citywide Water System Master Plan Update.

The City’s existing WWTP on Holly Drive currently collects and treats wastewater to a Title 22 Disinfected Tertiary standard. The construction of a recycled water system to distribute this water to various non -potable use areas began in 2018; currently the only service connection is for the Legacy Fields sports complex . In the future, the City will extend the recycled water system and use recycled water to meet irrigation and other non-potable demands in existing service areas (thus offsetting some existing potable water use) and future service areas.

The topics discussed in this chapter include:
• Description of Existing Recycled Water System
• Existing Recycled Water System Demands
• Recommended Buildout Recycled Water System
• Recycled Water System Criteria
• Recycled Water System Evaluation Results
• Summary of Recommended Future Recycled Water System Improvements To assist in the evaluation of the City’s overall recycled water system at buildout, the recycled water infrastructure recommended in this chapter includes the infrastructure required to serve the Tracy Hills development and, for consistency, is based on the adopted water use, peaking factors, and system performance criteria described in previous chapters of this Citywide Water System Master Plan. Although the Tracy Hills development is located within separate and distinct recycled water pressures zones from the rest of the City, West Yost has included the Tracy Hills development in the future recycled water system evaluation because it will be served by pipelines, tanks, and booster pump stations in other pressure zones which need to be sized to account for the demands in Tracy Hills . Including the Tracy Hills development in the buildout hydraulic model evaluation ensures that the City’s buildout recycled water system is integrated and sufficient to serve the recycled water demands of the entire City (including Tracy Hills). Because planning for future phases of Tracy Hills is subject to change, the sizing of any future water system improvements to serve Tracy Hills should be confirmed based on the latest development plans and associated water demand projections.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-2 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.2 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM
This section provides a summary of the City’s existing recycled water system facilities.

Construction of the City’s recycled water distribution system began in 2018. Currently, the recycled water distribution system consists of the Zone A booster pump station (Zone A BPS) at the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant, and approximately 7.6 miles of 30-inch diameter and 24-inch diameter transmission mains on the north and west side of the City , as shown on Figure 9-1. Additional details regarding each facility are presented below.

9.2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant
The City’s WWTP is located on Holly Drive, just north of the I -205 freeway as shown on Figure 9-1. The WWTP currently has a permitted average dry weather flow treatment capacity of

10.8 mgd. The WWTP treats domestic and industrial wastewater using a combination of primary clarification, an advanced activated sludge process with anoxic denitrification, tertiary filtration, and chlorination. The chlorinated effluent meets Title 22 requirements for recycled water use for landscape irrigation and other non-potable uses.

9.2.2 Booster Pump Stations
The City currently has one recycled water booster pump station, as shown on Figure 9-1. The Zone A BPS is located at the WWTP, and supplies water from the post-aeration basin to the recycled water distribution system. Table 9-1 presents a summary of the existing recycled water booster pump station with key characteristics such as design capacity and number of booster pumps.

Table 9-1. Existing Recycled Water Booster Pump Station Booster
Pump
Station
Name Location
Year
Installed
Pump
1,
gpm
Pump
2,
gpm
Pump
3,
gpm
Pump
4,
gpm
Pump
5,
gpm
Rated
Capacity(a),
gpm
Firm
Capacity(b),
gpm
Firm
Capacity(b),
mgd
Zone A(c) WWTP 2019 1,736 1,736 1,736 1,736 1,736 8,680 6,944 10.0 (a) Maximum pumping capacity of entire pump station.
(b) Assumes that the largest booster pump at the pump station is offline. (c) Pumps are equipped with variable frequency drives.

9.2.3 Pressure Zone Boundaries
The City’s existing recycled water system consists of a single pressure zone, Zone A. Pressure zone boundaries at buildout of the recycled water system are discussed in Section 9.4.2 Pressure Zone Recommendations.

9.2.4 Transmission and Distribution Pipelines
The City’s existing recycled water transmission system pipeline network is shown on Figure 9-1.

The only recycled water pipelines currently in service are 7.6 miles of 30-inch diameter and 24-inch diameter transmission mains from the WWTP west to Lammers Road and south to Kimball High S chool.

Existing Zone A
Pump Station

SCHULTERD

SCHULTE RD

SCHULTE RD

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

NAGLEE RD

VON SOSTEN RD

BETHANY RD

HOLLY DRMIDDLE RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

LAMMERS RD

CHRISMAN RD

REEVE RD
24"
30"
24"
24"
24"
0 2,5001,250
Scale in Feet
Figure 9-1
Existing Recycled Water
System Facilities
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/10/2020 8:29:37 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_9-1_Existing Recycled Water .mxd : nhoman Notes:

1. The City's recycled water hydraulic model is not an all pipes model. Some pipes which are not hydraulically
significant were excluded from the model.

2. Existing recycled water pipelines which are not yet in service are not shown.

Symbology
Existing Booster Pump Station
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Existing Transmission Pipeline
(Diameter >16 inches)
Legacy Fields

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-4 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
Recycled water distribution pipelines have also been installed by developers in several future service areas, including Cordes Ranch, Ellis Sp ecific Plan Phase 1, and Tracy Hills Phase 1.

However, because no source of recycled water is currently available in these areas, these pipelines are currently connected to the potable water system via backflow prevention devices and are delivering potable water to serve irrigation demands. Once recycled water service is extended to these areas, the recycled water mains will be connected to the recycled water system and the temporary connections to the potable water system will be removed.

9.2.5 SCADA System
The Zone A BPS is integrated into the City’s SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system for the WWTP. This integration provides for remote operation and monitoring of the Zone A BPS, as well as automated shut down of the pump station if chlorinated effluent from the WWTP does not meet Title 22 standards at a given time.

9.3 EXISTING RECYCLED WATER DEMANDS
The City’s only active recycled water service connection is the Legacy Fields sports complex.

9.4 RECOMMENDED BUILDOUT RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM
The City intends to expand the existing recycled water system to serve non-potable water demands to most future development areas, help offset some existing potable water irrigation demands, and reduce treated effluent discharges to Old River. One integrated recycled water system is proposed and will serve and distribute recycled water throughout the entire SOI.

In addition to serving non-potable water demands, the future recycled water system must also be capable of delivering recycled water to the DMC for the City’s proposed Recycled Water Exchange Program with the USBR. As discussed in Chapter 5, this exchange agreement would allow the City’s recycled water to be discharged to the DMC and a like amount of raw water to be diverted from the DMC by the City for treatment at the JJWTP for potable use. This exchange agreement is an essential part of the City’s projected future water supply portfolio. Future recycled water system infrastructure was sized to account for the additional flow which must be conveyed through the recycled water system from the WWTP to the DMC. It should be noted that the quantity of recycled water required for the exchange agreement is assumed to be up to about 9,000 af/yr. This is higher than the exchange amount assumed in the City’s 2020 UWMP and described in Chapter 4 (7,500 af/yr), and reflects an approximate upper bound for the recycled water exchange program. Subsequent revisions to the projected potable water demand and/or the water supply availability and reliability assumptions may change the required quantities and timing of the proposed Recycled Water Exchange Program.

Recommendations for the buildout recycled water system w ere developed based on previous studies of the recycled water system, projected recycled water demands, the requirements of the planned recycled water exchange program, and the recycled water system performance criteria. A hydraulic model was used to confirm that these recommendations meet the City’s recycled wate r system performance criteria described in Chapter 6 . The recommended buildout recycled water system is shown on Figure 9-2.

205
580
Zone A Tank
Zone D and Zone E Pump Stations
Discharge to
Delta-Mendota Canal
Zone C Pump Station
Zone B Pump Station
Future Zone F
Pump Station and
Diurnal Storage
A F
B
C
D
E
Additional Zone A
pumps at buildout
a

SCHULTE CT

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

NAGLEE RD

LAMMERS RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

MIDDLE RD

CHRISMAN RD

VON SOSTEN RD

REEVE RD

SCHULTE RD
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d uc t
D e l t a - M e n d ota
C
anal
30"
24"
24" 24"
24"
16"
8"
24"
24"
24"
30"
30"
12"
12"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
16"
30" 30"
30"
12"
18"
18"
12"
24"
8"
24"
12"
16"
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Figure 9-2
Buildout Recycled Water
System Facilities
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 8/24/2021 1:14:51 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_9-2_Buildout Recycled Water.mxd : rchu Notes:

1. Pressure Zones represent approximate boundaries.

2. The City's recycled water hydraulic model is not an all pipes model. Some pipes which are not hydraulically
significant were excluded from the model.

3. Existing recycled water pipelines which are not yet in service are shown as future pipelines.

Symbology
Proposed Future Facilities
Future Booster Pump Station
Future Storage Tank
Delta Mendota Canal Discharge
Point
Future Distribution Pipeline
(Diameter ≤ 16 inches)
Future Transmission Pipeline
(Diameter > 16 inches)
Existing System Facilities
Existing Booster Pump Station
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Existing Transmission Pipeline
(Diameter >16 inches)
Legacy Fields
Future Recycled Water Use Area
Recycled Water Pressure Zone
Zone A Transmission
Pipeline
a
Zone C
Distribution
Pipelines

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

VALPICO RD
12" 8"
30"
12"

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-6 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.4.1 Future Recycled Water Demand Areas
The demand areas to be served by the future recycled water system are shown on Figure 9-2. For this Citywide WSMP Update, the following assumptions were made regarding the areas served by the recycled water system:
• Most large development projects located on the west side of the City will be served by the recycled water system by 2025, except for Cordes Ranch, West Side Industrial, and Tracy Hills.
• Recycled water service will be extended to Cordes Ranch, West Side Industrial, and Tracy Hills by 2040; it is expected that this will occur after 2025, but much sooner than 2040.
• Future recycled water service areas on the east side of the City (East Side Industrial, Chrisman Road, UR 1, and Rocha), will be served by a separate recycled water transmission main which will not be constructed until after 2040. • Recycled water service will not be extended to developments in the following areas due to the isolated locations and relatively small individual potential recycled water demands within them:
— I-205 Corridor Specific Plan
— Industrial Areas Specific Plan
— Northeast Industrial Specific Plan
— Berg Road Subdivision
— Berg/Byron Remainder
— Other small, approved projects (refer to Table 3-1, footnote (f) for the full list) — Miscellaneous Infill
• Only a small number of existing parks and irrigated areas located close to the recycled water transmission main alignments will be converted to recycled water service; it should be noted that the previously proposed Gateway Exchange Program, under which recycled water service would be extended to most existing parks and large irrigated areas in the City to offset potable water demands from the Gateway development (now called Westside), is no longer being considered.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-7 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.4.2 Pressure Zone Recommendations
The proposed recycled water pressure zones developed in the 2012 WSMP mimicked the potable water distribution system pressure zones. However, the recent Recycled Water Optimization Evaluation1 (Optimization Study) recommended adjustments to the proposed pressure zones to minimize parallel pipelines and reduce the cost of the sys tem. The recycled water pressure zones proposed in this WSMP Update are generally consistent with those recommended in the Optimization Study:
• Zone A will extend west and south from the City’s WWTP to Schulte Road and the western boundary of the Westside Specific Plan. The existing 30-inch diameter and 24-inch diameter transmission main on the north side of the City and in Lammers Road will serve Zone A.
• Zone B will extend west from the western boundary of Zone A, and will include Cordes Ranch, Westside Industrial Area, and portions of the Westside Specific Plan.

It will be served by a 24-inch diameter transmission main in Schulte Road. • Zone C will include the Ellis Specific Plan, Avenues, Tracy Village, UR 10, and SWP & Valpico service areas. Due to the relatively small demands from these areas and the compact nature of this pressure zone, no pipelines greater than 12-inch diameter are recommended to serve it.
• Zones D and E will be located southwest of the DMC and will exclusively serve Tracy Hills. Each pressure zone will be served by dedicated 12-inch and 16-inch diameter distribution mains. Because the elevation and configuration of the Tracy Hills development favors a pressure zone break where Interstate 5 crosses the property, the Tracy Hills pressure zones have not been adjusted from the pressure zones recommended in the 2000 Tracy Hills Master Plan.
• Zone F will extend east and south from the City’s WWTP to include the recycled water service areas on the east side of the City. This pressure zone will be served by a 24-inch diameter and 16-inch diameter transmission main. This pressure zone was not included in the Optimization Study, which only considered the recycled water system for the west side of the City. The 2012 WSMP assumed that the east side developments would be served by the same pressure zone(s) as the west side developments. However, because the east side backbone transmission main is no longer planned to connect to the rest of the system, it is recommended that the east side developments be served by a separate pressure zone with a hydraulic grade selected to better serve the specific elevation range of the east side service area. This will require the construction of a separate booster pump station at the WWTP dedicated to serving Zone F.

The proposed ground elevation ranges and the modeled hydraulic grade ranges for each pressure zone are presented in Table 9-2.

1 “Recycled Water Optimization Evaluation”, CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc, January 2017.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-8 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
Table 9-2. Recycled Water Distribution Pressure Zones
Pressure
Zone
Nominal Hydraulic Grade,
ft
Expected Range of Service Elevations,
ft
Static Pressure Range,
psi
A 375 10 - 91 122 - 157
B 410 105 - 230 77 - 131
C 360 100 - 185 75 - 112
D 470 209 - 310 69 - 112
E 550 305 - 400 64 - 105
F 264 19 - 96 72 - 105
psi = pounds per square inch

Ground elevations and hydraulic grades were chosen to provide a system pressure range of 60 psi to 100 psi where possible, as defined in the recycled water system evaluation criteria. The nominal hydraulic grades shown in Table 9-2 are based on the design head of existing pumps (Zone A), planned pumps (Zone B), or on the pump design head necessary to maintain a minimum of 60 psi service pressure within the pressure zone under peak hour conditions (all other zones). Nominal hydraulic grade was calculated at the pump discharge. Because of friction losses in the distribution system during operations, system pressure near the pump stations can exceed 100 psi. The highest expected pressure in the proposed recycled water system is 178 psi on the discharge side of the Zone A BPS.

9.4.3 Allocation of Future Recycled Water Demands
The projected recycled water demands were previously discussed in Chapter 4. The maximum day and peak hour p eaking factors were also presented previously in Chapter 4 and are summarized below in Table 9-3.

Table 9-3. Recycled Water Demand Peaking Factors
Parameter Value
Maximum Month Demand, percent of annual demand(a) 17.6% Maximum Day Peaking Factor(b) 6.4
Peak Hour Peaking Factor(c) 7.0
(a) Based on 2017 monthly potable water use for dedicated landscape irrigation accounts. (b) Multiply the average day demand times the peaking factor to obtain maximum day demand. Maximum Day Demand Peaking Factor = Maximum Month Demand (percent) / 30 days x 365 x (24/8). (c) Multiply the average day demand times the peaking factor to obtain peak hour demand. Assumed to be 110 percent of Maximum Day Demand, refer to Chapter 4.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-9 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
Projected buildout recycled water average day, maximum day, and peak hour demands (including existing demands) are summarized in Table 9-4. Additional detail of the projected average day recycled water demands at buildout for each future development project by pressure zone (not including existing demands) is provided in Table 9-5.

Table 9-4. Buildout Recycled Water Demands by Pressure Zone Pressure Zone
Average Day Demand(a) Maximum Day Demand(b) Peak Hour Demand(c) gpm mgd gpm mgd gpm mgd
Zone A 1,534 2.2 9,818 14.1 10,739 15.5
Zone B 876 1.3 5,605 8.1 6,131 8.8
Zone C 242 0.3 1,547 2.2 1,692 2.4
Zone D 388 0.6 2,484 3.6 2,717 3.9
Zone E 264 0.4 1,690 2.4 1,848 2.7
Zone F 620 0.9 3,968 5.7 4,340 6.2
Total 3,924 5.7 25,112 36.2 27,466 39.6
(a) Equal to existing water demands plus projected buildout water demands presented in Table 4-16. (b) Maximum day demand is 6.4 times the average day demand. (c) Peak hour demand is 7.0 times the average day demand.

9.4.4 Recycled Water Exchange Program Seasonality
For purposes of this Citywide Water System Master Plan Update, it has been assumed that the future recycled water system would be designed to deliver up to about 9,000 af/yr of recycled water to the DMC as part of the City’s planned recycled water exchange agreement with the USBR.

This is more than the 7,500 af//yr assumed in the City’s 2020 UWMP and described in Chapter 4 of this Citywide Water System Master Plan Update , but reflects an approximate upper bound for the recycled water exchange program. Because recycled water demands from City customers vary significantly with the season, the time of year in which exchange recycled water is discharged to the DMC has a significant effec t on the sizing of recycled water system facilities. For example, the volume of water the system can discharge to the DMC during a maximum day demand condition in the summer will be significantly less than the volume the system can discharge to the DMC in the winter, when recycled water demands are low.

It is assumed that the City will be able to optimize the timing of recycled water discharge to the DMC so that the majority of the exchange takes place in off-peak months. During a maximum day demand condition in a single dry year at buildout, it was assumed that the recycled water system would only have to deliver 4.1 mgd to the DMC. In a single dry year , the recycled water system should be capable of delivering as much as 13.8 mgd to the DMC on a winter day with negligible recycled water demands from City customers.

Table
9-5. Summary of Buildout Average Day Recycled Water Demands by Development Project(a,b )
gpm pe
rcent of total gpm percent of total gpm percent of total gpm percent of total gpm percent of total gpm percent of total gpm percent of total UR 5 (Bright) 49.51 3.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 49.51 1.28% UR 7 (Bright/Castro) 44.52 3.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 44.52 1.15% Rocking Horse 6.26 0.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 6.26 0.16% Tracy Village 0.00% 0.00% 98.28 40.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 98.28 2.55% UR 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 263.48 42.47% 263.48 6.83% Ellis 0.00% 0.00% 66.93 27.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 66.93 1.74% Avenues 0.00% 0.00% 12.01 4.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 12.01 0.31% UR 10 0.00% 0.00% 45.42 18.80% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 45.42 1.18% Tracy Hills 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 388.09 100.00% 264.08 100.00% 0.00% 652.18 16.91% Westside 271.46 18.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 271.46 7.04% Cordes Ranch 0.00% 600.42 68.56% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 600.42 15.57% UR 4 (Bright Triangle) 61.87 4.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 61.87 1.60% UR 3 (Sandhu) 254.46 17.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 254.46 6.60% I-205 Expansion 79.63 5.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 79.63 2.06% West Side Industrial 0.00% 254.51 29.06% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 254.51 6.60% East Side Industrial 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 144.09 23.23% 144.09 3.74% Larch-Clover 159.91 10.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 159.91 4.15% Chrisman Road 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 44.25 7.13% 44.25 1.15% Rocha 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 28.89 4.66% 28.89 0.75% SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow 0.00% 0.00% 19.00 7.86% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 19.00 0.49% Dobler/Maibes 9.01 0.61% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.01 0.23% Holly Sugar Industrial 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 55.99 9.03% 55.99 1.45% Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant 0.00% 20.88 2.38% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 20.88 0.54% Legacy Fields 246.68 16.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 246.68 6.40% Parks RW Conversion (west side) 283.94 19.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 283.94 7.36% Parks RW Conversion (east side) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 83.69 13.49 % 83.69 2.17%
Total
1,467.24 100% 875.81 100% 241.64 100% 388.09 100% 264.08 100% 620.39 100% 3,857.26 100% Zone E Total
(a) W
ater demands shown are for new development only and do not include existing recycled water demands. See Appendix A for detailed demand calculations by project or development area. (b) Water demands shown include UAFW.

Projec
t or Development Area
Zone A Zone FZone B Zone C Zone D
n\c\404\12-1
8-41\e\ch8\ch8tables
Last Revised: 03-19-20
City o
f Tracy
Citywide Water System
Master Plan Update
Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-11 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.4.5 Seasonal and Diurnal Storage Facilities
The projected average monthly demands and available flow from the City’s WWTP are summarized in Table 9-6. As shown in the table, there will be an excess amount of recycled water available from the Holly Drive WWTP in all months and therefore seasonal storage is not required.

Table 9-6. Projected Buildout Recycled Water Supply and Demand Month
Available Wastewater
Flow(a), af
Recycled Water
Demand, af(b)
Exchange Program
Discharge to DMC, af(c)
Remaining Amount,
af(d)
January 1,501 70 1,154 277
February 1,356 44 1,186 127
March 1,501 50 1,074 378
April 1,453 213 886 355
May 1,501 515 776 210
June 1,453 910 519 24
July 1,501 1,103 376 22
August 1,501 935 447 119
September 1,453 1,112 322 19
October 1,501 793 537 171
November 1,453 437 778 238
December 1,501 148 895 458
Total 17,676 6,329 8,947 2,400
(a) Based on Average Dry Weather Flow value of 15.78 mgd received from Carollo by e-mail on June 9, 2020. (b) Monthly recycled water demand distribution based on 2017 City irrigation water use pattern. (c) Monthly discharge to DMC based on availability of wastewater and the capacity of the proposed recycled water system facilities.
(d) Remaining Amount = Available Wastewater Flow - (Recycled Water Demand + Exchange Program Discharge)

Diurnal storage tanks were sized based on the volume of storage needed to supply peak hour demands and to reduce the required size of recycled water pump stations and pipelines. It is recommended that the City construct a 5.7 MG recycled water storage tank just north of the California Aqueduct on Lammers Road. The location of this tank is consistent with that recommended in the Optimization Study. This tank will supply Zone A via gravity, and Zones D and E via pumping, during the 8-hour irrigation period. It is recommended that the City construct the Zone A Tank before other recycled water storage facilities. The Zone A Tank should meet the City’s recycled water storage requirements through 2040.

An additional 2.6 MG of diurnal storage may be needed at the WWTP at buildout. This value may change depending on the actual WWTP effluent diurnal flow. It is recommended that the City re- evaluate the required diurnal storage at the WWTP by performing a diurnal flow study in 2040.

Table 9-7 summarizes the recommended distribution of diurnal storage in the buildout recycled water system.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-12 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
Table 9-7. Diurnal Storage Distribution
Storage Location Storage Volume, MG
Diurnal Storage at WWTP 2.6(a)
Zone A Tank 5.7
Total 8.3
(a) Volume may be reduced depending on Holly Drive WWTP effluent recycled water diurnal flow rate. May go to zero if low flow period exceeds combined Zones A and F maximum pumping rate.

9.4.6 Booster Pump Stations
As the recycled water system develops, additional booster pump stations will be required to move water from Zone A into higher pressure zones, and to pump water from the WWTP into Zone F.

With the exception of the Zone C BPS, the locations of the recommend ed booster pump stations are based on the Optimization Study, which modified the booster pump station recommendations in the 2012 WSMP.

The Zone A BPS will require an additional 3,472 gpm of pumping capacity at buildout. It was assumed that this will be provided by two new pumps with characteristics similar to those of the existing pumps.

The recommended location of the Zone C BPS was moved from Lammers Road to the corner of Valpico Road and Corral Hollow Road. The Zone C BPS cannot be located on the west side of the Ellis Specific Plan, as the headloss through the existing and planned 8 -inch diameter pipes in the Ellis would be too great to maintain 60 psi residual pressure in the majority of Zone C. Assuming that the DMC transmission pipeline will be constructed in Valpico Road and Tracy Boulevard (see

9.2.6 Recycled Water Pipeline Alignment below), it is recommended that the Zone C BPS be located at the corner of Valpico Road and Corral Hollow Road so as to draw water from this transmission pipeline. If the Alternative B alignment is selected for the DMC transmission pipeline, the Zone C BPS could be constructed at the intersection of Corral Hollow Road and Linne Road instead. If the Alternative C alignment is selected for the DMC transmission pipeline, the Zone C BPS could be constructed in several locations, but additional Zone A or Zone C pipelines would need to be constructed to connect Zone C to the rest of the system.

The Tracy Hills Master Plan recommended that both the Zone D and Zone E booster pump stations be constructed adjacent to the Tracy Hills storage tank, instead of having t he Zone E BPS constructed as a booster station in Zone D. West Yost concurs with this recommendation, and the logic behind this is three-fold. First, the distribution system is small enough so that the additional pipeline length is not substantial. Second, an emergency pressure reducing valve station was proposed so that some reduced flow could be delivered to Zone D through Zone E, if necessary.

Third, having both pump stations at the same location makes it easier for the City to operate and maintain these pump stations.

A summary of the proposed booster pump station design characteristics is shown in Table 9-8.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-13 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
Table 9-8. Recycled Water Distribution System Pump Station Design Criteria Pump Station Design Flow Rate, gpm(a) Design Total Dynamic Head, feet Zone A 12,152(b) 362
Zone B 5,780(c) 181
Zone C 1,700(c) 125
Zone D 2,700(c) 225
Zone E 2,000(c) 305
Zone F 4,400(c) 250
(a) Total pump station capacity assumes all pumps at pump station are in service. (b) Pump station capacity required to fill Zone A Tank and supply exchange water to Delta Mendota Canal during a maximum day. Assumes two new pumps with properties similar to existing pumps are installed by buildout. (c) Based on peak hour demands.

These proposed booster pump stations should supply a minimum design pressure of 60 psi in all zones to meet the design criteria described in Chapter 6.

9.4.7 Recycled Water Pipeline Alignments
Where possible, future recycled water pipeline alignments were based on existing recycled water pipelines which have been constructed but are not yet in service, or on planned recycled water pipelines for near-term developments. The alignment of the future Zone A transmission pipeline in Lammers Road is consistent with the Optimization Study, as is the alignment of the Zone B transmission pipeline in Schulte Road. It is expected that the alignment of these pipelines when constructed will not differ significantly from Figure 9-2. However, the alignment of the DMC exchange program transmission pipeline and the Zone F transmission pipeline may vary from the alignments shown on Figure 9-2.

Three alignment alternatives were considered for the DMC exchange pipeline , as illustrated on Figure 9-3. It should be noted that all three alignments assume that the discharge of recycled water to the DMC will be required to occur downstream of the City’s JJWTP intake per initial discussions with the SWRCB and the USBR. Alternative (shorter) pipeline alignments may be possible if the location for the discharge of recycled water to the DMC can be relocated to a location upstream of the City’s JJWTP intake.

The three alignment alternatives are described as follows:
• The Alternative A pipeline would tie into the Zone A transmission pipeline in Lammers Road at the intersection of Lammers Road and Valpico Road. It would consist of approximately 23,700 feet of pipeline constructed in Valpico Road, Corral Hollow Road, Linne Road, and Tracy Boulevard. The Alternative A pipeline would be Zone A. Although Alternative A is the longest of the three alignment alternatives, the entire alignment for Alternative A is within existing streets.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-14 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
• The Alternative B pipeline would tie into the Zone A transmission pipeline in Lammers Road just north of the DMC, and would consist of approximately 19,100 feet of pipeline running along the south edge of the Ellis Specific Plan, in Linne Road, and in Tracy Boulevard. The Alternative B pipeline would be Zone A.

Part of the alignment for Alternative B is along the south edge of the Ellis Specific Plan, not within an established right-of-way, and may require an easement. • The Alternative C pipeline would be supplied directly from the Zone A reservoir, and would consist of approximately 14,200 feet of pipeline running through Tracy Hills Phase 5 and land currently used for mining. Alternative C may require a dedicated pump station to ensure sufficient head in the exchange pipeline for discharge to the DMC. Part of the alignment for Alternative C is not within an established right-of- way and passes through a quarry, which may require an easement and possibly difficult construction conditions.

For this WSMP Update, it was assumed that Alternative A will be selected as it follows existing street alignments and therefore would likely be the most straight -forward in terms of design and construction, although it is the longest of the three pipeline alignment alternatives. Because it is the longest alignment it is also the most conservative alternative for budgeting purposes.

Similarly, the alignment of the Zone F transmission pipeline depicted on Figure 9-2 was selected to provide a conservative cost estimate. It is recommended that detailed pipeline alignment alternative studies be conducted before either the DMC exchange program transmission pi peline or the Zone F transmission pipeline are constructed.

9.4.8 Recycled Water Pipeline Sizes
The proposed recycled water backbone distribution system pipelines range in size from a minimum of 8-inch diameter to a maximum of 30 -inch diameter. A Hazen -Williams friction “C” factor of 130 was used in the hydraulic model. This “C” factor was used for PVC pipelines (16 -inch diameter or smaller) and lined ductile iron or steel pipelines (24-inch diameter or larger). Pipeline diameters were based on those recommended in the optimization study, with adjustments to meet the system performance criteria outlined in Chapter 6.

Zone A Tank
Zone D and Zone E Pump Stations
Discharge to
Delta-Mendota Canal

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

TRACY BL

VALPICO RD

LAMMERS RD

LINNE RD
Cal i f ornia
A
queduct
D
e l t a - M e n d o t a C a n a l
16"
12"
30"
12"
12"
12"
8"
12"
16"
0 1,500750
Scale in Feet
Figure 9-3
DMC Exchange Pipeline
Alternatives
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 8/24/2021 1:15:54 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_9-3_DMC Alternatives.mxd : rchu Notes:

1. Future facilities for Zone C not shown on
this figure, as the configuration of this zone is
dependent on the Delta Mendota Canal pipeline
alternative selected for construction.

Symbology
Future Booster Pump Station
Future Storage Tank
Delta Mendota Canal Discharge Point
Future Distribution Pipeline (Diameter
≤ 16 inches)
Future Transmission Pipeline
(Diameter > 16 inches)
Delta Mendota Canal Pipeline
Alternatives
A
B
C
Future Recycled Water Use Area
Sphere of Influence

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-16 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.5 RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM CRITERIA
Evaluation of the proposed Citywide recycled water distribution system utilizes criteria that are different from the criteria used to evaluate the potable water system. The proposed evaluation criteria developed for the recycled water system are described in Chapter 6. In summary, because maximum day recycled water demands typically occur during approximately an eight hour per day period between 10:00 pm and 6:00 am (instead of the typical 24-hour period of the potable water system), and peak hour demands are only slightly greater than maximum day demands as described in Chapter 4, recycled water pipeline water velocity must be lower than in potable water systems to help reduce energy/power costs, thus lowering operational costs.

As described in Chapter 6, the desired recycled water system delivery pressure ranges from a minimum of 60 psi to a maximum of 100 psi. Recycled water pipeline water velocity must be less than 10 feet per second (fps) to avoid potential damage to pipelines, and velocity less than 6 fps is preferred. Pipeline velocities greater than 6 feet per second would cause excess friction pressure loss and would require larger pump station power requirements and greater pipeline pressure near the pump stations.

9.6 RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION RESULTS
Typical recycled water systems must deliver the greatest flow during a peak hour demand condition, which coincides with the middle of an assumed 8-hour irrigation period. However, due to the planned recycled water exchange program, in some portions of the City’s planned recycled water system, the flow during the remaining 16 hours of the day (the “fill period”) may exceed that of the peak hour. Therefore, the City’s recycled water hydraulic model was used to evaluate the buildout recycled water system under peak hour demand and fill period conditions.

9.6.1 Peak Hour Demand Scenario
During a peak hour demand scenario, evaluation results indicate that the buildout recycled water system could adequately deliver peak hour demands to meet the City’s minimum pressure criterion of 60 psi at all existing and future recycled water service locations as illustrated on Figure 9-4. It should be noted that many locations in the recycled water system will experience pressures greater than 100 psi during a peak hour demand condition ; the pressures at these locations are labeled on Figure 9-4. Some locations in Zone A near the WWTP may experience pressures as high as 15 3 psi, during a peak hour demand condition and even higher pressures during tank fill periods as described below . Service connections in these areas should be fitted with individual PRVs as needed.

As illustrated on Figure 9-4, some of the existing Zone A transmiss ion pipelines will experience velocities exceeding 6 fps during a peak hour demand condition. However, the velocity in these pipelines is well below the maximum allowable velocity of 10 fps, and therefore no mitigation is recommended.

205
580
Zone A Tank
Zone D and Zone E Pump Stations
Discharge to
Delta-Mendota Canal
Zone C Pump Station
Zone B Pump Station
Future Zone F
Pump Station and
Diurnal Storage
A F
B
C
D
E
Additional Zone A
pumps at buildout

SCHULTE CT

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

NAGLEE RD

LAMMERS RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

MIDDLE RD

CHRISMAN RD

VON SOSTEN RD

REEVE RD

SCHULTE RD
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d uc t
D e l t a - M e n d ota
C
anal

7.1 fps

6.3 fps 151 psi
150 psi
149 psi
153
psi152 psi142 psi
139 psi
136 psi
130 psi
129 psi121 psi
112 psi
103 psi
104 psi
105 psi
101 psi
111 psi
120 psi
102 psi
102 psi
103 psi
107 psi
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Figure 9-4
Buildout Recycled Water
Peak Hour Demand
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 8/24/2021 1:16:57 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_9-4_PHD Results.mxd : rchu Notes:

1. Pressure Zones represent approximate boundaries.

2. The City's recycled water hydraulic model is not an all pipes model. Some pipes which are not hydraulically significant were excluded from the model.

3. Pressures not shown for locations with no expected
recycled water services.

Symbology
Peak Hour Pressure
Less than 60 psi
60 psi to 70 psi
70 psi to 80 psi
80 psi to 90 psi
90 psi to 100 psi
Greater than 100 psi
Pipeline Velocity
Velocity ≤ 6 fps
Velocity > 6 fps
Proposed Future Facilities
Future Booster Pump Station
Future Storage Tank
Delta Mendota Canal Discharge
Point
Existing System Facilities
Existing Booster Pump Station
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Legacy Fields
Future Recycled Water Use Area
Recycled Water Pressure Zone

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-18 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.6.2 Fill Period Scenario
During a fill period on a maximum demand day , results indicate that the buildout recycled water system could adequately re -fill the Zone A Tank while supplying 4.1 mgd to the DMC for the recycled water exchange program. As shown on Figure 9-5, some locations in the recycled water system will experience pressures greater than 100 psi during a fill period; some locations in Zone A near the WWTP may experience pressures as high as 178 psi. The pressures at these locations are labeled on Figure 9-5. Service connections in these areas should be fitted with individual PRVs as needed.

The feasibility of operating the planned Zone B Pump Station as an in-line booster station to assist in refilling the tank and supplying the DMC during the maximum day fill period was investigated.

If feasible, this would reduce the high pressures in Zone A near the WWTP. However, the planned capacity of the Zone B Pump Station is insufficient to supply the required flow and therefore cannot reduce the high pressures in Zone A.

As illustrated on Figure 9-5, some of the existing Zone A transmission pipelines will experience velocities exceeding 6 fps during a fill period. However, the velocity in these pipelines is well below the maximum allowable velocity of 10 fps, and therefore no mitigation is recommended.

205
580
Zone A Tank
Zone D and Zone E Pump Stations
Discharge to
Delta-Mendota Canal
Zone C Pump Station
Zone B Pump Station
Future Zone F
Pump Station and
Diurnal Storage
A F
B
C
D
E
Additional Zone A
pumps at buildout

SCHULTE CT

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

NAGLEE RD

LAMMERS RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

MIDDLE RD

CHRISMAN RD

VON SOSTEN RD

REEVE RD

SCHULTE RD
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d uc t
D e l t a - M e n d ota
C
anal

6.6 fps

6.6 fps

6.6 fps

6.6 fps

6.6 fps
175 psi
177 psi
177 psi
178 psi
178 psi
170
psi
167
psi164 psi159 psi
158 psi
149 psi
140 psi
130 psi122 psi
121 psi
112 psi
103 psi
99 psi
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Figure 9-5
Buildout Recycled Water
Fill Period
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 8/24/2021 1:17:39 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_9-5_Fill_Results.mxd : rchu Notes:

1. Pressure Zones represent approximate boundaries.

2. The City's recycled water hydraulic model is not an all pipes model. Some pipes which are not hydraulically significant were excluded from the model.

3. Pressures shown for Zone A service locations only.

Symbology
Zone A Pressure
Less than 60 psi
60 psi to 70 psi
70 psi to 80 psi
80 psi to 90 psi
90 psi to 100 psi
Greater than 100 psi
Pipeline Velocity
Velocity ≤ 6 fps
Velocity > 6 fps
Proposed Future Facilities
Future Booster Pump Station
Future Storage Tank
Delta Mendota Canal Discharge
Point
Existing System Facilities
Existing Booster Pump Station
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Legacy Fields
Future Recycled Water Use Area
Recycled Water Pressure Zone

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-20 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.7 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED FUTURE RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM

IMPROVEMENTS
The recommended backbone recycled water system improvements required to serve future recycled water demands and the recycled water exchange program are summarized below and illustrated on Figure 9-6. It should be no ted that these recommendations only identify facility improvements at a master plan level and do not necessarily include all required on -site infrastructure nor constitute design of improvements. Subsequent detailed design is required to determine the exact sizes and final locations of these proposed facility improvements.

Because the City’s recycled water program is still in its infancy, many planning factors used to size the system were based on industry averages or standard practice, due to the lack of d ata specific to the City of Tracy. As the recycled water system continues to expand and serve more customers, and as more data becomes available, the recommendations in this chapter should be periodically reviewed and revised to better fit the needs of the City’s recycled water use profile.

It should also be noted that the future hydraulic model is not an “all pipes” model ( i.e., not all smaller diameter pipelines are included); therefore, the hydraulic simulations performed as discussed above may not iden tify all necessary water system improvements. Consequently, it is recommended that further hydraulic evaluations be performed as additional details are provided for each future development project.

205
580
Zone A Tank
Zone D and Zone E Pump Stations
Discharge to
Delta-Mendota Canal
Zone C Pump Station
Zone B Pump Station
Additional Zone A
pumps at buildout
Future Zone F
Pump Station and
Diurnal Storage
A F
B
C
D
E
a

SCHULTE CT

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

NAGLEE RD

LAMMERS RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

MIDDLE RD

CHRISMAN RD

VON SOSTEN RD

REEVE RD

SCHULTE RD
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d uc t
D e l t a - M e n d ota
C
anal
30"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"8"
30"
30"
24"
16"
24"
24"
24"
30"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16"
12"
18"
18"
12"
8"
24"
12"
16"
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Figure 9-6
Proposed Future Recycled
Water System Improvements
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 8/24/2021 1:18:18 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_9-6_Recycled Water Improvements.mxd : rchu Notes:

1. Install a PRV on any service connection with peak hour or fill period pressures exceeding 100 psi.

2. Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at each new facility.

Symbology
Proposed Buildout Facilities
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Future Storage Tank
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Facilities
2025 Booster Pump Station
2025 System Pipeline
Delta Mendota Canal Discharge
Point
Existing System Facilities
Existing Booster Pump Station
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Existing Transmission Pipeline
(Diameter >16 inches)
Legacy Fields
Future Recycled Water Use Area
Recycled Water Pressure Zone
Zone A Transmission
Pipeline
a
Zone C
Distribution
Pipelines
12"
8"
30" 30"
12"

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

VALPICO RD
Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-22 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.7.1 2025 System Improvements
The recommended backbone recycled water system improvements required to serve 2025 recycled water demands are summarized below and shown on Figure 9-6. Planning and design for these improvements should be conducted so that these improvements can be constructed and operational by 2025.

9.7.1.1 Booster Pumping Facilities
• Zone C BPS: Install a new booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 1,700 gpm.

9.7.1.2 Pipelines
• To serve 2025 recycled water demands, install approximately 33,810 linear feet of new pipelines ranging in diameter from 12 to 30 inches; included in these pipelines is the pipeline needed to discharge recycled water to the DMC as part of the recycled water exchange program (as described above, the exchange program is an essential part of the City’s projected future water supply portfolio and should be implemented as soon as possible).
• To serve 2025 recycled water demands, install additional new pipelines of 16 inches in diameter or less within individual development projects; the total length of pipelines needed to serve 2025 recycled water demands is unknown, as not all 2025 development areas have detailed recycled water system infrastructure plans prepared.

9.7.1.3 Interconnections
• Install an individual PRV on any recycled water service connection with a peak hour or fill period pressure exceeding 100 psi.

9.7.1.4 SCADA System
• Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at each new water supply facility to provide operators with real-time system data and flexibility in system operations.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-23 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.7.2 Buildout System Improvements
The recommended backbone recycled water system improvements required to serve buildout recycled water demands are summarized below and shown on Figure 9-6. Planning and design for these improvements should be conducted so that these improvements can be constructed and operational as soon as possible, as funding is available, so that recycled water supplies can be used to meet landscape irrigation and other non-potable water demands to minimize the use of potable water supplies for these uses.

9.7.2.1 Storage Facilities
Note: Because the actual dimensions of each proposed storage facility have not been determined, the storage facility sizes below do no t include dead and freeboard storage requirements, which will be determined during design.
• Zone A Tank: Install a new storage tank with a minimum active storage capacity of

5.7 MG.
• WWTP Diurnal Storage: Install a new storage tank with a minimum active stor age capacity of 2.3 MG ; the need for this storage will depend on WWTP diurnal flow patterns, and it is recommended that the City re-evaluate the required diurnal storage at the WWTP by performing a diurnal flow study in 2040.

9.7.2.2 Booster Pumping Facilities
• Zone A BPS Expansion: Install additional Zone A booster pumps with a minimum pumping capacity of 3,472 gpm.
• Zone B BPS: Install a new booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 5,780 gpm; note that it is expected this booster pump station will be constructed after 2025, but well before 2040.
• Zone D BPS: Install a new booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 2,700 gpm.
• Zone E BPS: Install a new booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 2,000 gpm.
• Zone F BPS: Install a new booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 4,400 gpm.

Chapter 9
Buildout Recycled Water System Evaluation

9-24 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

9.7.2.3 Pipelines
• To serve buildout recycled water demands, install approximately 109,300 linear feet of new pipelines (in addition to the proposed 2025 pipelines) ranging in diameter from 12 to 30 inches.
• To serve buildout recycled water demands, install additional new pipelines of 16 inches in diameter or less within individual development projects; the total length of pipelines needed to serve buildout recycled water demands is unknown, as most buildout development areas do not have detailed recycled water system infrastructure plans prepared.

9.7.2.4 Interconnections
• Install an individual PRV on any recycled water service connection with a peak hour or fill period pressure exceeding 100 psi.

9.7.2.5 SCADA System
• Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at each new water supply facility to provide operators with real-time system data and flexibility in system operations.

10-1 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
CHAPTER 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter presents the recommended capital improvement program (CIP) for the City’s existing and future potable water systems and proposed future recycled water system to support the City’s projected future potable and recycled water demands, respectively. Recommended improvements to the existing and future potable water systems were described in Chapters 7 and 8, respectively.

In addition, infrastructure recommendations for the proposed future recycled water system were described in Chapter 9. It should be noted that the recommended CIP only identifies improvements at a Master Plan level and does not necessarily include all required on -site infrastructure or constitute design of improvements. Subsequent detailed design is required to determine the exact sizes and locations of these proposed improvements.

This chapter provides a summary of the recommended capital improvement projects, along with estimates of probable construction costs. Probable construction cost estimates have been developed for each prop osed improvement project, and will then allocated to existing rate payers and new development based on the need for and benefit provided by the proposed improvement. For example, the cost for a pipeline improvement to increase the fire flow availability in the existing potable water system will be allocated to existing rate payers, but a new pipeline required to serve buildout potable water demands will be allocated to new development. An additional analysis to evaluate the potential development impact fees that will be required to fund the buildout potable and recycled water system capital improvement costs will be provided in a separate memorandum.

Construction costs are presented in 2020 dollars and were developed based on bids from other municipal water facility design projects and standard cost estimating guides. Consistent with the 2012 WSMP, t he total CIP cost include s mark-ups equal to 40 percent of the estimated base construction costs to allow for general contingency, design and planning, construct ion management, and program administration as listed below:
• General Contingency: 15 percent
• Design and Planning: 10 percent
• Construction Management: 10 percent
• Program Administration: 5 percent
For this Citywide Water System Master Plan Update, it is assumed that land for buildout potable and recycled water facilities , if required, will be acquired at $ 190,000 per acre. Costs for land acquisition will only be added to major facilities (e.g., tank sites), where a large parcel is required.

Consequently, land acquisition costs do not include right-of-way acquisition costs for transmission and distribution mains. In addition, the proposed construction costs do not include costs for acquisition of additional surface water supplies, supply reliability, or for annual operation and maintenance. A complete description of the assumptions used in the development of the estimated probable construction costs is provided in Appendix E.

Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-2 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
This CIP excludes non-backbone facilities that only serve a specific development area, as costs associated with those facilities will be borne solely by the corresponding developers. For example, while facilities to serve specific development areas were evaluated as part of the overall buildout potable and recycled water sy stem operations, costs for facilities recommended for specific development areas are not included in the CIP. Costs for development-specific infrastructure will be evaluated in conjunction with separate planning efforts prepared for those developments.

This Citywide Water System Master Plan Update only includes costs for backbone system facilities with more widespread system benefit, henceforth known as program facilities. Costs for program facilities will be allocated to new developments proportionally bas ed on projected demand. These cost allocations will be evaluated and presented in a separate report.

The following sections of this chapter describe the components of the potable and recycled water system capital improvement program developed for this Citywide Water System Master Plan Update:
• Recommended Potable Water System Capital Improvement Program • Recommended Recycled Water System Capital Improvement Program • Capital Improvement Program Implementation

10.2 RECOMMENDED POTABLE WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Summaries of the recommended capital improvement projects for the existing, 2025, and buildout potable water systems are presented below in Section 10.2.1 Existing Potable Water System Improvements, Section 10.2.2 2025 Potable Water Sys tem Improvements , and Section 10.2.3 Buildout Potable Water System Improvements , respectively. Each section contains a table with preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended potable water system improvements for the corresponding time horizon. Section 10.2.4 Water Treatment Plant Expansion Costs discusses how the costs for the 2008 JJWTP expansion are to be allocated amongst future developments. All potable water system costs are summarized in Section 10.2.5 Summary of Recommended Potable Water System CIP Costs, which also discusses the proposed cost allocation between existing rate payers and new development.

Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-3 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

10.2.1 Existing Potable Water System Improvements
Chapter 7 evaluated the ability of the City’s existing potable water system to meet the recommended water system operational and design criteria described in Chapter 6. Based on the existing potable water system evaluation, improvements were recommended to eliminate existing system hydraulic capacity deficiencies, as listed in the following section. These improvements are recommended based on existing water system demands, and are not triggered by projected future water demands from new development. These improvements should be completed as soon as possible to eliminate existing system deficiencies.
• Pipeline Improvement1
— Replace the existing pipelines in 20th Street between Bessie Avenue and Parker Avenue, Wall Street between Lowell Avenue and 20th Street, Emerson Avenue between Bessie Avenue and Holly Drive, Court Drive between Whittier Avenue and Lowell Avenue, and Lowell Avenue between Parker Avenue and Holly Drive with approximately 6,000 linear feet (lf) of new 8-inch diameter pipelines. — Install approximately 515 lf of 12-inch diameter pipeline in Ninth Street between School Street and Tenth Street.
— Replace approximately 485 lf of existing 4-inch diameter pipeline in Tracy Boulevard north of Mount Diablo Avenue with new 12-inch diameter pipeline.

This improvement was previously recommended in the 2012 WSMP.

The locations of the recommended existing potable water system improvement projects are shown on Figure 10-1. Preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended existing potable water system improvements are presented in Table 10-1.

It is also recommended that the City implement a renewal and replacement (R&R) program to proactively replace aging and deteriorating water pipelines before they fail. This Citywide Water System Master Plan Update does not include costs for replacement of aging infrastructure.

Therefore, it is recommended that the City perform a separate study which evaluates the condition of existing water system assets and develops a prioritized list and annual budget for asset replacement based on age, material, failure history, and other parameters.

1 The existing hydraulic model is not an “all pipes” model; therefore, the hydraulic simulations performed may not identify all necessary water system improvements. Consequently, it is recommended that City staff review older parts of the water system, where smaller diameter pipelines are typically found and consider possible upsizing of these pipelines, as the City plans for future pipeline renewal and replacement projects.

Improv
ement Type Improvement Description CIP ID
Estimat
ed
Const
ruction Cost,
dollars(b)
CIP
Cost, dollars
(includes m
ark-
ups)(c,d)
Pipeline Improv
ement
Replace existing pipelines in 20th Street between Bessie Avenue and Parker Avenue, Wall Street between Lowell Avenue and 20th Street, Emerson Avenue between Bessie Avenue and Holly Drive, Court Drive between Whittier Avenue and Lowell Avenue and Lowell Avenue between Parker Avenue and Holly Drive with 8-inch diameter pipe.

ECIP-PI-1 6,000 lf 1,140,000 1,596,000 Pipeline Improvement Install 12-inch diameter pipe in Ninth Street between School Street and Tenth Street ECIP-PI-2 515 lf 133,900 187,000 Pipeline Improvement Replace existing 4-inch diameter pipes on Tracy Boulevard, between Fourth Street and Mt. Diablo Avenue with 12-inch diameter pipes ECIP-PI-3 485 lf 126,100 177,000 1,960,000$
(d) To
tal rounded to nearest $1,000.

Table
10-1. Probable Construction Costs for Recommended Existing Potable Water System CIP(a) Quantity
T
otal
(a) Costs s
hown are presented in 2020 dollars.
(b) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate. (c) Costs include mark-ups equal to 40 percent (General Contingency: 15 percent; Design and Planning: 10 percent; Construction Management: 10 percent; and Program Administration: 5 percent).

W E S T Y

O S T A S S O C I A T E S
n\c\
404\12-18-41\e\ch10\CIP Tables
Last Revised: 06-25-20
City o
f Tracy
Citywide Water System
Master Plan Update
0 6,0003,000
Scale in Feet
Figure 10-1
Recommended Existing
Potable Water System
Improvements
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/16/2020 3:39:10 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_10-1_ECIP_Improvements.mxd : nhoman Notes:

1. The City's existing hydraulic model is not an
all pipes model. Some pipes which are not
hydraulically significant were excluded from
the model.

Symbology
Existing Pipeline
Pipeline Improvement
Pressure Regulating Station
Booster Pump Station
Groundwater Well
Storage Tank
John Jones Water Treatment Plant
Pressure Zone
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3 (IPC/PPBP)
Ellis Reduced Zone
580
205
#1
#2
#3

SCHULTE RD

SCHULTE RD

ELEVENTH ST

LINNE RD

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

NAGLEE RD

MIDDLE RD

REEVE RD

VON SOSTEN RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

CHRISMAN RD

BANTA RD

LAMMERS RD
C a l i f or ni a
A q u e d u c t
Del ta- M e n d o ta
C
a n a l
Ball Park Well
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8" 8"
8"
12"
8"
12"
12"
12"
12"
6"
10"
6"
12"
8"
8"6"
12"
12"
12"
4"
4"
6"
6"
6"
6"
6" 8"
12" 8"
6"
6"
12"
12"
4"
8"
6"
6"
4"
8"
4"
6"
6"
6"
12"
8"12"
12"
4"
6"
12"
8"
4"
8"
6"
6"
8"
12"
8"
6"6"
8"
4"
8" 8"
12"
8"
6"
12"
8"
6"
4"
4"
6"
4"
6"
8"
12"
4"
4"
6"
8"

COURT DR

CARLTON WY

LOWELL AV

TRACY BL

TWENTY-THIRD ST

BESSIE AV

PARKER AV

EMERSON AV

WALL ST

PEREIRA AV

TWENTIETH ST

WHITTIER AV

TWENTY-SECOND ST

TWENTY-FIRST ST

HOLLY DR

ELEVENTH ST

GONZALEZST

GILLETT AL

GRUNAUER AL

SPUR LINE RR

NINTH ST

SIXTH ST
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

EIGHTH ST

JACKSON AL

EAGAN AL

SEVENTH ST

TENTH STCIVIC CENTER PZ

HAMILTON AL
E ST
F ST

EAST ST

SCHOOL ST

CIVIC CENTER DR
12"
12"
10"
12" 10"
6"
8"
6"
8"
12" 10"
12"
8"
8"
12"
6"
6"
8"
20"
12"
8"
8"8"
6" 12"
12"
8"
6"
12" TENNIS LN

RODEO WY

WEST CT

MT DIABLO AV

FOURTH ST

BURLINGTON DR

TRACY BL

RENOWN DR
12"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
12"
10"
12"
8"
8"
12"
36"
12"
12"
6"
0 400200
Scale in Feet
0 400200
Scale in Feet
0 550275
Scale in Feet
INSET #1
CIP ID: ECIP-PI-1
INSET #2
CIP ID: ECIP-PI-2
INSET #3
CIP ID: ECIP-PI-3
Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-6 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

10.2.2 2025 Potable Water System Improvements
Chapter 8 summarized the evaluation of the City’s 2025 potable water system and its ability to meet the recommended water system operational and design criteria described in Chapter 6. Based on the 2025 potable water system evaluation, the following backbone water system improvements were recommended to meet projected 2025 potable water demands. Only program facilities are listed below; the complete list of recommended 2025 potable water system improvements (including non-program facilities) and their recommended timing can be found in Chapter 8. • Pipeline Improvements2
— To serve 2025 potable water demands, replace existing pipelines in Sixth Street, Tracy Boulevard, and Eleventh Street with approximately 1,390 linear feet of new 18-inch and 24-inch diameter pipelines.
— To serve 2025 potable water demands, jack and bore approximately 160 linear feet of new pipelines. This represents one (1) jack and bore installation. • New Pipelines plus Jack and Bore
— To serve 2025 potable water demands, install approximately 43,010 linear feet of new pipelines ranging in diameter from 12 to 24 inches. — To serve 2025 potable water demands, jack and bore approximately 1,050 linear feet of new pipelines. This represents four (4) distinct jack and bore installations. • Interconnections
— Install PRVs at Schulte Road and Bud Lyons Way and at Schulte Road and Pavillion Parkway before the transmission main in Schulte Road is re-zoned to Zone 3. • Re-zoning
— Re-zone the existing transmission mains in Lammers Road, Schulte Road, and Hansen Road from Zone 2 to Zone 3 as described in Appendix D. The capital costs of pipelines and other new facilities which need to be constructed prior to re-zoning are included in their respective categories. The capital cost of the re-zoning itself is assumed to be insignificant.
• Groundwater Wells
— Provide ammonia addition for existing City wells (Lincoln Well, Lewis Manor Well, Park & Ride Well and Ball Park Well) (as noted below under Buildout System Improvements, all future wells are also recommended to be equipped with ammonia addition).
— A feasibility study is recommended to develop an implementation plan for future ASR expansion (see additional discussion in Chapters 5 and 8).

2 The buildout hydraulic model was developed as a backbone system and is not an “all pipes” model; therefore, the hydraulic simulations performed may not identify all necessary water system improvements. Consequently, it is recommended that further hydraulic evaluations be performed as additional details are provided for each future development project.

Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-7 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
The locations of the recommended 2025 potable water system improvement projects are shown on Figure 10-2. Preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended 2025 potable water system improvements are presented in Table 10-2. Detailed maps illustrating the proposed pipeline projects for the 2025 potable water system are provided in Appendix F.

10.2.3 Buildout Potable Water System Improvements
Chapter 8 also summarized the evaluation of the City’s buildout potable water system and its ability to meet the recommended water system operational and design criteria described in Chapter 6. Based on the buildout potable water system evaluation, the following backbone water system improvements were recommended to meet projected buildout potable water demands.

Only program facilities are listed below; the complete list of recommended buildout potable water system improvements (including non -program facilities) and their recommende d timing can be found in Chapter 8.
• Land Acquisition
— To account for land acquisition costs, it was assumed that 1.5 acres will be required for each tank site.
— To account for land acquisition costs, it was assumed that 0.25 acres will be required for each ASR well site.
• Storage Reservoir
Note: Because the actual dimensions of each proposed storage tank have not been determined, the recommended storage facility sizes do not include dead and freeboard storage requirements, which will be determined during design. — To provide buildout water storage capacity, installation of the following storage facilities is recommended:
▪ Westside Tank - 1.0 MG
▪ Install a new clearwell at the JJWTP with a minimum active storage capacity of 1.0 MG to provide storage for Zone 3. It is assumed that the existing JJWTP site can accommodate this new clearwell (i.e., land acquisition is not necessary).
• Groundwater Well
— To provide emergency and dry year water supply, installation of the following groundwater wells is recommended:
▪ Westside - ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,500 gpm ▪ Wainwright - ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,500 gpm ▪ Larsen Park - ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,500 gpm ▪ Ellis - ASR well with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 1,000 gpm ▪ All new groundwater wells should be equipped with ammonia addition and backup power

3Q
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT

WW WW W
W
7n
!(
!( !(
!(
!(!(!(
!( !(
!(!(
XW

XWXW XWXW XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ 7n
7n
7n
7n
7n
7n
7n
7n
7n
7n
§¨¦
580
§¨¦
580
§¨¦
205
§¨¦
205
§¨¦
580
a

BCIP-T-WS
BCIP-PS-WSZ1&2

BCIP-W-WS

BCIP-W-WA

BCIP-W-LP
From Mossdale BPS
←
1234
5 6

BCIP-PRV-AV

BCIP-PRS-WS

BCIP-W-EL
a
NCIP-PRV-2NCIP-PRV-1

BCIP-PRV-C
Equip wells with
ammonia addition
O ld Rive
r
C a l i f o r n i a
A q u ed u c t
D e l t a - M e n d o t a C a n a l

SCHULTE CT

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

BIRD RD

LOVELY RD

LAMMERS RD

CHRISMAN RD

NAGLEE RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

BETHANY RD

MIDDLE RD

VON SOSTEN RD

AHERN RD

REEVE RD

DURHAM FERRY RD

SCHULTE RD
16"
12"
16"
16"
12"
12"16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
20"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12"
16"16"
16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16" 16" 20"
12"
12"
16"
16"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
16" 16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16"
16"
16"
12"
16"
24"
12"
12"
16"
16"
12"
16"
20"
20"
20"
16"
12"
12"
20"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
0 5,5002,750
Scale in Feet
Figure 10-2
Recommended Future
Potable Water System
Program Improvements
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 3/21/2022 1:39:47 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_10-2_Program Facilities.mxd : cpittner Notes:

1. The City's hydraulic model is not an all
pipes model. Some pipes which are not
hydraulically significant were excluded
from the model.

2. Jack and bore pipeline projects are not
shown, but jack and bore is required for
canal, railroad, or major highway crossings.

3. Install SCADA system monitoring of flows
and pressures at each new facility.

4. Install on-site backup power at each new
pumping facility.

5. Only existing and program facilities are
shown.

Symbology
Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
XW Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
!( Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
¼ÐÚ Buildout Booster Pump Station
7n Buildout Groundwater Well
UT Buildout Storage Tank
Buildout System Pipeline
W SCADA System Improvement
Proposed 2025 Facilities
!( 2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Existing System Facilities
XW Existing Pressure Regulating Station
!( Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
¼ÐÚ Existing Booster Pump Station
7n Existing Groundwater Well
UT Existing Storage Tank
3Q John Jones Water Treatment Plant
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
Pressure Zone
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Ellis Reduced Zone
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
3Q
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
¼ÐÚ
7n
7n
BCIP-T-CW3
BCIP-PS-Z3
JJWTP Buildout Program Facilities
20"
7n7n
Well #8
NCIP-PI-1&2

ELEVENTH ST

TRACY BL
18"
24"
BCIP-JJWTP (10 mgd expansion to
40 mgd treatment capacity).

Impro
vement Type Improvement Description CIP ID
Estimated
Construction Cost,
dollars(b)
CIP Cost, d
ollars
(includes
mark-ups)(c,d)
Pipel
ine Improvement
Replace existing 12-inch diameter pipeline
crossin
g railroad track with 18-inch diameter pipe.

Repla
ce existing 12-inch diameter pipelines in
Sixth Street, Tracy Boulevard, and Eleventh
Street with 24-inch diameter pipe.

NCIP-PI-1 1,389 lf 627,574 879,000 Jack and Bore Improvement 18-inch diameter (24-inch casing) NCIP-PI-2 159 lf 109,451 153,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 8-inch diameter NCIP-PD-8 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 10-inch diameter NCIP-PD-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 12-inch diameter NCIP-PD-12 2,013 lf 523,453 733,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 14-inch diameter NCIP-PD-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 16-inch diameter NCIP-PD-16 1,051 lf 351,924 493,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 18-inch diameter NCIP-PD-18 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 20-inch diameter NCIP-PD-20 609 lf 243,594 341,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 24-inch diameter NCIP-PD-24 3,426 lf 1,593,146 2,230,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 8-inch diameter NCIP-PU-8 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 10-inch diameter NCIP-PU-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 12-inch diameter NCIP-PU-12 18,666 lf 4,199,794 5,880,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 14-inch diameter NCIP-PU-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 16-inch diameter NCIP-PU-16 9,270 lf 2,642,003 3,699,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 18-inch diameter NCIP-PU-18 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 20-inch diameter NCIP-PU-20 7,975 lf 2,711,517 3,796,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 24-inch diameter NCIP-PU-24 - lf - - Jack and Bore Boring and Receiving Pits NCIP-JB-PIT 5 each 200,000 280,000 Jack and Bore 8-inch diameter (16-inch casing) NCIP-JB-8 - lf - - Jack and Bore 12-inch diameter (21-inch casing) NCIP-JB-12 - lf - - Jack and Bore 16-inch diameter (24-inch casing) NCIP-JB-16 374 lf 258,046 361,000 Jack and Bore 18-inch diameter (24-inch casing) NCIP-JB-18 - lf - - Jack and Bore 20-inch diameter (30-inch casing) NCIP-JB-20 - lf - - Jack and Bore 24-inch diameter (36-inch casing) NCIP-JB-24 677 lf 673,911 943,000 Interconnection PRV at Schulte Road and Bud Lyons Way NCIP-PRV-1 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 Interconnection PRV at Schulte Road and Pavillion Prkway NCIP-PRV-2 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 Groundwater Wells
Equi
p Lincoln Well, Park & Ride Well, Ball Park
Wel
l and Lewis Manor Well with ammonia
addi
tion
NCIP-GW-1 1
L.S. - 1,500,000
ASR Expansion Study Evaluate future ASR well sites and operational scenarios NCIP-ASR 1 L.S. - 350,000
21,988,000$
(b) Estim
ated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate. (c) Costs include mark-ups equal to 40 percent (General Contingency: 15 percent; Design and Planning: 10 percent; Construction Management: 10 percent; and Program Administration: 5 percent). (d) Total rounded to nearest $1,000.

Tab
le 10-2. Probable Construction Costs for Recommended 2025 Potable Water System CIP(a) Quant
ity
Shared City-side Facilities
Total
(a) Costs shown are presen
ted in 2020 dollars.

W E S T Y O S T A

S S O C I A T E S
n\c\404
\12-18-41\e\ch10\CIP Tables
Last Revised: 03-19-2022
City of Tr
acy
Citywide Water System
Master Plan Update
Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-10 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
• Booster Pump Station3
— To provide buildout water pumping capacity and to convey water from proposed partially buried storage reservoirs, installation of the following pumping facilities is recommended:
▪ Zone 3 BPS (JJWTP) – Install additional Zone 3 booster pumps at the JJWTP with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 1,500 gpm
▪ Westside Zone 1 Tank - Booster pump station with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 4,500 gpm
▪ Westside Zone 2 Tank - Booster pump station with a minimum firm pumping capacity of 2,400 gpm
• New Pipeline plus Jack and Bore4
— To serve buildout potable water demands, install approximately 131,280 linear feet of new pipelines (in addition to the proposed 2025 pipelines) ranging in diameter from 12 to 20 inches.
— To serve buildout potable water demands, jack and bore approximately 2,750 linear feet of new pipelines. This represents eleven (11) distinct jack and bore installations.
• Interconnection
— To provide supply during peak demands and/or emergency conditions between pressure zones, installation of the following pressure zone interconnections is recommended:
▪ Westside PRS (from Zone 2 into Zone 1)
▪ Avenues PRV (from Ellis Reduced Zone into Zone 2)
— To provide adequate pressure to the Plan C area and prevent the accumulation of stagnant water in dead-end mains, installation of six (6) PRVs is recommended before the Plan C re-zoning occurs (to be funded with Plan C funding).

Note: The estimated probable construction costs do not include installation of individual PRVs on water service connections with static pressures exceeding 80 psi, as these will be the responsibility of individual developer(s). • Re-zoning
— Re-zone the Plan C area from Zone 2 to Zone 3. The capital costs of pipelines and other new facilities which need to be constructed prior to re-zoning are included in their respective categories. The capital cost of the re-zoning itself is assumed to be insignificant.

3 Cost based on the firm pumping capacity required.
4 The buildout hydraulic model was developed as a backbone system and is not an “all pipes” model; therefore, the hydraulic simulations performed may not identify all necessary water system improvements. Consequently, it is recommended that further hydraulic evaluations be performed as additional details are provided for each future development project.

Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-11 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
• SCADA System and Backup Power
— Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at PRS #1-#6 to provide operators with additional understanding and flexibility in system operations. — Add remote operation of Well 8 from the SCADA system to provide additional operational flexibility.
— Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at each new water supply facility to provide operators with real-time system data and flexibility in system operations. The capital cost for SCADA system installation is included in the cost for these facilities.
— Install on-site backup power to any proposed buildout system pumping facility to improve supply reliability. The capital cost for backup power is included in the cost for new pump stations.
• JJWTP Expansion
— A future additional 10 mgd expansion of the JJWTP (for a total treatment capacity of 40 mgd) is recommended to provide the City with additional water treatment capacity, as well as operational flexibility and reliability. The expansion would also include a new administration/maintenance building to accommodate future staffing needs and maintenance activities.
• Participation in Phase 2 Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project — The City’s participation in the Phase 2 Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project would increase the City’s water supply reliability by providing storage of supplies for use in dry years.
— The estimated cost for 5,000 acre-feet of storage for the City will be approximately $10 million plus an additional $1.5 million for implementation and will be shared by existing rate payers and new development. • Participation in the B.F. Sisk Dam Raise & Reservoir Expansion Project — The City’s participation in the B.F. Sisk Dam Raise & Reservoir Expansion Project would increase the City’s water supply reliability by providing storage of supplies for use in dry years.
— The estimated cost for 5,000 acre-feet of storage for the City will be approximately $38 million and will be shared by existing rate payers and new development. • Water Master Plan Updates
— Regular updates of this Citywide Water System Master Plan are recommended to evaluate potable water and recycled water infrastructure needs to reflect any changes in future development plans, water use trends and patterns, and water supply availability and reliability, as well as new regulations and operational needs as new potable water and recycled water system infrastructure is constructed. It is recommended that updates be prepared at least once every 10 years, or more often if changing conditions warrant more frequent updates. For purposes of this Citywide Water System Master Plan Update, three future updates are planned.

Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-12 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
The locations of the recommended buildout program facility improvements are shown on Figure 10-2. Preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended buildout potable water system improvements are presented in Table 10-3. Detailed maps illustrating the proposed pipeline projects for the buildout potable water system are provided in Appendix F.

10.2.4 Water Treatment Plant Expansion Costs
In 2008, the JJWTP was expanded by 15 mgd to provide additional treatment capacity for future development. While some of this capacity is now utilized by the City’s existing water users, it is estimated that 9 mgd of the expansion capacity is still available for future developments to use. To recoup the costs of constructing this remaining 9 mgd of treatment capacity, the City will include a charge for the JJWTP expansion capacity in the developer impact fees. The cost of the 2008 expansion was $45 million, or $3 million per mgd of capacity. Therefore, the remaining JJWTP expansion cost to be allocated amongst future developments is $27 million.

In addition, as discussed in Chapter 8, a future additional 10 mgd expansion of the JJWTP is recommended. The estimated construction cost is $4 million per mgd, or $40 million for the recommended 10 mgd expansi on, plus an additional $12 million for a new administration/ maintenance building.

10.2.5 Summary of Recommended Potable Water System CIP Costs Preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended existing, 2025, and buildout potable water system improvements are presented in Tables 10-1, 10-2, and 10-3, respectively.

The total existing potable water system CIP cost estimate is $2.0 million, while the total 2025 and buildout potable water system CIP cost estimates (which include only program facilities) are $22.0 million and $211.9 million, respectively. The estimated probable construction costs do not include installation of individual PRVs on potable water service connections with static pressures exceeding 80 psi, as these will be the responsibility of individual developer. The remaining previous JJWTP expansion buy-in cost is $27.0 million.

The total CIP costs from Table 10-1 should be allocated to existing rate payers, while the total CIP costs from Table 10-2 and Table 10-3 and the previous JJWTP expansion buy-in cost should be allocated to new development; with the exception of the costs for the participation in the Phase 2 Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project which should be shared between existing rate payers and future development.

Impro
vement Type Improvement Description CIP ID
Esti
mated
Const
ruction Cost,
dollars(b)
CIP Co
st, dollars
(includes
mark-up
s)(c,d
)
Land A
cquisition(e) Tank S
ites BCIP-LA-T 1 sites - 285,000 Land Acquisition(f) ASR W
ell Sites BCIP-LA-W 4 sites - 190,000 Storage Reservoir(g) 1.0 MG Clearw
ell No. 3 at JJWTP BCIP-T-CW3 1 L.S. 3,008,250 4,212,000 Storage Reservoir(g) 1.0 MG West
side Tank BCIP-T-WS 1 L.S. 3,008,250 4,212,000 Groundwater Well 2,500 gpm ASR Well in Westside BCIP-W-WS 1 L.S. 3,900,000 5,460,000 Groundwater Well 2,500 gpm ASR Well in Wainwright BCIP-W-WA 1 L.S. 3,900,000 5,460,000 Groundwater Well 2,500 gpm ASR Well in Larsen Park BCIP-W-LP 1 L.S. 3,900,000 5,460,000 Groundwater Well 1,000 gpm ASR Well in Ellis BCIP-W-EL 1 L.S. 2,500,000 3,500,000 Booster Pump Station(h) 2.16 mgd at Z
one 3 Clearwell (JJWTP) BCIP-PS-Z3 1 L.S. 1,554,755 2,177,000 Booster Pump Station(h) 6.48 mgd at W
estside Zone 1 Tank BCIP-PS-WSZ1 1 L.S. 2,263,735 3,169,000 Booster Pump Station(h) 3.46 mgd at W
estside Zone 2 Tank BCIP-PS-WSZ2 1 L.S. 1,767,450 2,474,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 8-inch diameter BCIP-PD-8 11 lf 2,090 3,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 10-inch diameter BCIP-PD-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 12-inch diameter BCIP-PD-12 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 14-inch diameter BCIP-PD-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 16-inch diameter BCIP-PD-16 11,349 lf 3,801,881 5,323,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 18-inch diameter BCIP-PD-18 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 20-inch diameter BCIP-PD-20 1,132 lf 452,853 634,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 24-inch diameter BCIP-PD-24 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 8-inch diameter BCIP-PU-8 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 10-inch diameter BCIP-PU-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 12-inch diameter BCIP-PU-12 84,957 lf 19,115,431 26,762,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 14-inch diameter BCIP-PU-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 16-inch diameter BCIP-PU-16 27,691 lf 7,891,999 11,049,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 18-inch diameter BCIP-PU-18 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 20-inch diameter BCIP-PU-20 6,148 lf 2,090,151 2,926,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 24-inch diameter BCIP-PU-24 - lf - - Jack and Bore Boring and Receiving Pits BCIP-JB-PIT 11 each 440,000 616,000 Jack and Bore 8-inch diameter (16-inch casing) BCIP-JB-8 - lf - - Jack and Bore 12-inch diameter (21-inch casing) BCIP-JB-12 1,489 lf 885,921 1,240,000 Jack and Bore 16-inch diameter (24-inch casing) BCIP-JB-16 1,257 lf 867,182 1,214,000 Jack and Bore 18-inch diameter (24-inch casing) BCIP-JB-18 - lf - - Jack and Bore 20-inch diameter (30-inch casing) BCIP-JB-20 - lf - - Jack and Bore 24-inch diameter (36-inch casing) BCIP-JB-24 - lf - - Interconnection Westside PRS (12-inch) BCIP-PRS-WS 1 L.S. 250,000 350,000 Interconnection Avenues PRV (12-inch) BCIP-PRV-AV 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 SCADA Well No. 8 BCIP-S-W8 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 SCADA Pressure Regulating Station No. 1 BCIP-S-1 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 SCADA Pressure Regulating Station No. 2 BCIP-S-2 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 SCADA Pressure Regulating Station No. 3 BCIP-S-3 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 SCADA Pressure Regulating Station No. 4 BCIP-S-4 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 SCADA Pressure Regulating Station No. 5 BCIP-S-5 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 SCADA Pressure Regulating Station No. 6 BCIP-S-6 1 L.S. 125,000 175,000 JJWTP Expansion Expand JJWTP from 30 mgd to 40 mgd and new administration/maintenance building BCIP-JJWTP 1 L.S. 52,000,000 72,800,000 Participation in Phase 2 Los
Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion
Project(i)
5,000 ac
re-feet of storage for dry year use BCIP-LVE 1 L.S. 11,500,000 11,500,000 Participation in B.F. Sisk Dam
Raise & Reservoir Expansion
Project(i)
5,000 ac
re-feet of storage for dry year use BCIP-SISK 1 L.S. 38,000,000 38,000,000 Water Master Plan Updates Future updates to Water Master Plan (three updates assumed @ $500,000 per update) BCIP-WMP 3 each 1,500,000 211,916,000$
(i) Cost f
or participation in Phase 2 Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project and B.F. Sisk Dam Raise & Reservoir Expansion Project to be shared by existing rate payers and new development.

Table 10-3
. Probable Construction Costs for Recommended Buildout Potable Water System CIP(a) Quantit
y
Shared City-side Facilities
Total
(a) Costs
shown are presented in 2020 dollars.
(g) Recommended volume based on active volume. Cost assumes the construction of a partially buried prestressed concrete tank. (h) Recommended capacity based on firm pumping capacity. (b) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate. (c) Costs include mark-ups equal to 40 percent (General Contingency: 15 percent; Design and Planning: 10 percent; Construction Management: 10 percent; and Program Administration: 5 percent). (d) Total rounded to nearest $1,000.
(e) Assumes each tank site is 1.5 acres. Cost includes Westside Tank site. (f) Assumes each ASR well site is 0.25 acres. Cost includes Westside, Wainwright, Larsen Park, and Ellis ASR Well sites.

W E S

T Y O S T A S S O C I A T E S
n\c\
404\12-18-41\e\ch10\CIP Tables
Last Revised: 09-19-2022
City
of Tracy
Citywide Water System
Master Plan Update
Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-14 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

10.3 RECOMMENDED RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A summary of the recommended capital improvement projects for the recycled water system is presented below in Section 10.3.1 2025 Recycled Water System Improvements and Section 10.3.2 Buildout Recycled Water System Improvements . Each section contains a table with preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended recycled water system improvements. These costs are summarized in Section 10.3.3 Summary of Recommended Recycled Water System CIP Costs.

10.3.1 2025 Recycled Water System Improvements
Based on the recycled water system evaluation, the following backbone improvements were recommended to meet projected 2025 recycled water demands. Only program facilities are listed below; the complete list of recommended 2025 recycled water system improvements (including non-program facilities) and their recommended timing can be found in Chapter 9. • Booster Pump Station5
— To provide 2025 recycled water pumping capacity, installation of the following pumping facilities is recommended:
▪ Zone C BPS - Booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 1,700 gpm.
• New Pipeline plus Jack and Bore6
— To serve 2025 recycled water demands, install approximately 11,370 linear feet of new pipelines ranging in diameter from 8 to 30 inches.
— To serve 2025 recycled water demands, jack and bore approximately 590 linear feet of new pipelines. This represents 2 distinct jack and bore installations. — To deliver recycled water to the DMC as part of the City’s planned recycled water exchange agreement with the USBR, install approximately 23,680 linear feet and jack and bore approximately 180 linear feet (in 1 installation) of new, 30-inch diameter pipeline. This assumes Alignment A as depicted on Figure 9-3 is constructed. A detailed alignment study should be conducted to determine the final alignment of the recycled water exchange pipeline. Actual length of the recycled water exchange pipeline may change considerably if a different alignment is selected. A separate line item for program implementation is also included for the City’s planned recycled water exchange agreement to account for coordination and negotiations with the USBR and SWRCB which may require additional studies, legal review and assistance and staff and consultant time.

Note: Within individual developments, additional new pipelines of 16-inch diameter and less will be required. The total length of pipelines needed to serve 2025 recycled water demands is unknown, as some development areas are still preparing recycled water system plans.

5 Cost based on the firm pumping capacity required.
6 The buildout hydraulic model was developed as a backbone system and is not an “all pipes” model; therefore, the hydraulic simulations performed may not identify all necessary recycled water system improvements. Consequently, it is recommended that further hydraulic evaluations be performed as additional details are provided for each future development project.

Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-15 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
The locations of the recommended 2025 recycled water program facility improvements are shown on Figure 10-3. Preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended 2025 recycled water system improvements are presented in Table 10-4. Detailed maps illustrating the proposed pipeline projects for the 2025 potable water system are provided in Appendix G.

10.3.2 Buildout Recycled Water System Improvements
As discussed in Chapter 9, the buildout recycled water system is expected to consist of one system that encompasses the entire SOI. Based on the buildout recycled water system evaluation, the following backbone recycled water system improvements were recommended to meet projected buildout recycled water demands. Only program facilities are listed below; the complete list of recommended buildout recycled water system improvements (including non -program facilities) and their recommended timing can be found in Chapter 9. • Land Acquisition
— To account for land acquisition costs, assume 1.5 acres will be required for each tank site.
• Storage Reservoir
Note: Because the actual dimensions of each proposed storage tank have not been determined, the recommended storage facility sizes do not include dead and freeboard storage requirements, which will be determined during design. — To provide buildout recycled water storage capacity, installation of the following storage facilities is recommended:
▪ Zone A Tank – install an above ground, welded steel storage tank with a minimum active storage capacity of 5.7 MG
▪ Install a diurnal storage tank at the WWTP with a minimum active storage capacity of 2.3 MG. It is assumed that the existing WWTP site can accommodate this new tank (i.e., land acquisition is not necessary). The need for this storage will depend on WWTP diurnal flow patterns, and it is recommended that the City re-evaluate the required diurnal storage at the WWTP by performing a diurnal flow study in 2040.
• Booster Pump Station
— To provide buildout recycled water pumping capacity and to convey water from proposed partially buried storage reservoirs, installation of the following pumping facilities is recommended:
▪ Zone A BPS Expansion – install additional booster pumps with a minimum pumping capacity of 3,472 gpm
▪ Zone B BPS – Booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 5,780 gpm
▪ Zone D BPS – Booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 2,700 gpm
▪ Zone E BPS – Booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 2,000 gpm
▪ Zone F BPS – Booster pump station with a minimum pumping capacity of 4,400 gpm
Impr
ovement Type Improvement Description CIP ID
Estimated
Construction Cost,
dollars(b)
CIP Cost, do
llars
(includes
mark-ups)(c,d)
Booster
Pump Station 2.45 mgd for Zone C NCIP-PS-C 1 L.S. 1,441,820 2,019,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 8-inch diameter NCIP-PD-8 4,962 lf 868,372 1,216,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 10-inch diameter NCIP-PD-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 12-inch diameter NCIP-PD-12 3,055 lf 778,900 1,090,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 14-inch diameter NCIP-PD-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 16-inch diameter NCIP-PD-16 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 18-inch diameter NCIP-PD-18 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 20-inch diameter NCIP-PD-20 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 24-inch diameter NCIP-PD-24 131 lf 60,939 85,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 30-inch diameter NCIP-PD-30 3,218 lf 1,818,131 2,545,000 New DMC Pipeline (Developed Area) 30-inch diameter NCIP-PD-DMC-30 23,683 lf 13,380,877 18,733,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 8-inch diameter NCIP-PU-8 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 10-inch diameter NCIP-PU-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 12-inch diameter NCIP-PU-12 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 14-inch diameter NCIP-PU-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 16-inch diameter NCIP-PU-16 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 18-inch diameter NCIP-PU-18 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 20-inch diameter NCIP-PU-20 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 24-inch diameter NCIP-PU-24 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 30-inch diameter NCIP-PU-30 - lf - - Jack and Bore Boring and Receiving Pits NCIP-JB-PIT 2 each 80,000 112,000 Jack and Bore 8-inch diameter (16-inch casing) NCIP-JB-8 154 lf 79,907 112,000 Jack and Bore 12-inch diameter (21-inch casing) NCIP-JB-12 - lf - - Jack and Bore 16-inch diameter (24-inch casing) NCIP-JB-16 - lf - - Jack and Bore 18-inch diameter (24-inch casing) NCIP-JB-18 - lf - - Jack and Bore 20-inch diameter (30-inch casing) NCIP-JB-20 - lf - - Jack and Bore 24-inch diameter (36-inch casing) NCIP-JB-24 - lf - - Jack and Bore 30-inch diameter (42-inch casing) NCIP-JB-30 434 lf 483,956 678,000 Jack and Bore (DMC Pipeline) Boring and Receiving Pits NCIP-JB-DMC-PIT 1 each 40,000 56,000 Jack and Bore (DMC Pipeline) 30-inch diameter (42-inch casing) NCIP-JB-DMC-30 178 lf 198,418 278,000 Recycled Water Exchange Program
Implementation
Additional studies, legal review and
assistance, City staff and consultant time NCIP-DMC 1 L.S. 1,000,000 1,000,000 27,924,000$
(b) Estimate
d construction costs do not yet reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate. (c) Costs include mark-ups equal to 40 percent (General Contingency: 15 percent; Design and Planning: 10 percent; Construction Management: 10 percent; and Program Administration: 5 percent). (d) Total rounded to nearest $1,000.

Tab
le 10-4. Probable Construction Costs for the Recommended 2025 Recycled Water System CIP(a) Quan
tity
Shared City-side Facilities
Total
(a) Costs s
hown are presented in 2020 dollars.

W E S T Y O S T A S S O C I A T E S
n\c\404
\12-18-41\e\ch10\CIP Tables
Last Revised: 03-07-22
City
of Tracy
Citywide Water System
Master Plan Update
205
580

NCIP-PS-C

BCIP-PS-B

BCIP-PS-F

BCIP-T-DS
A F
B
C
D
E

BCIP-T-A

BCIP-PS-A
NCIP-PD-DMC-30
a

BCIP-PS-E BCIP-PS-D

SCHULTE CT

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

NAGLEE RD

LAMMERS RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

MIDDLE RD

CHRISMAN RD

VON SOSTEN RD

REEVE RD

SCHULTE RD
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d uc t
D e l t a - M e n d ota
C
anal
12"
30"
8"
30" 30"
30"
24"
24"
24"
30"
12"
12"
16"
18"
18"
24"
0 4,0002,000
Scale in Feet
Figure 10-3
Recommended Future
Recycled Water System
Program Improvements
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 4/17/2022 4:49:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Report Figures\Fig_10-3_RW Program Facilities.mxd : rchu Notes:

1. The City's hydraulic model is not an all pipes model.

Some pipes which are not hydraulically significant were excluded from the model.

2. Jack and bore pipeline projects are not shown, but jack and bore is required for canal, railroad, or major
highway crossings.

3. Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and
pressures at each new facility.

4. Only existing and program facilities are shown.

Symbology
Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buidlout Storage Tank
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Booster Pump Station
2025 System Pipeline
Delta-Mendota Canal Pipeline
Delta-Mendota Canal Discharge Point
Existing System Facilities
Existing Booster Pump Station
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Existing System Pipeline
Legacy Fields
Future Recycled Water Use
Recycled Water Pressure Zone
Zone A Transmission
Pipeline
Zone C
Distribution
Pipeline

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

VALPICO RD
Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-18 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update
• New Pipeline plus Jack and Bore7
— To serve buildout recycled water demands, install approximately 71,550 linear feet of new pipelines (in addition to the proposed 2025 pipelines) ranging in diameter from 12 to 30 inches.
— To serve buildout potable water demands, jack and bore approximately 1,590 linear feet of new pipelines. This represents 5 distinct jack and bore installations.

Note: Within individual developments, additional new pipelines of 16-inch diameter and less will be required. The total length of pipelines needed to serve buildout recycled water demands is unknown, as some development areas are still preparing recycled water system plans.
• SCADA System
— Install SCADA system monitoring of flows and pressures at each new water supply facility to provide operators with real-time system data and flexibility in system operations. The capital cost for SCADA system installation is included in the cost for these facilities.

The locations of these recommended buildout recycled water program facility improvements are shown on Figure 10-3. Preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended buildout recycled water system improvements are presented in Table 10-5. Detailed maps illustrating the proposed pipeline projects for the buildout recycled water system are provided in Appendix G.

10.3.3 Summary of Recommended Recycled Water System CIP Costs As discussed in Appendix E, unit construction costs for pipelines, booster pump stations, and storage tanks are essentially the same as for the potable water system. However, unit construction costs for recycled water system pipelines 8 inches and 12 inches in diameter are slightly less than for potable water pipelines, because the 8-inch and 12-inch diameter recycled water pipelines are assumed to be constructed from PVC instead of ductile iron.

Preliminary capital cost estimates for the recommended 2025 and buildout recycled water system are presented in Table 10-4 and Table 10-5, respectively. The estimated probable construction costs do not include installation of individual PRVs on recycled water service connections with peak hour or fill period pressures exceeding 100 psi, as these will be the responsibility of individual developer.

The total 2025 recycled water system CIP cost estimate is $27.9 million, while the total buildout recycled water system CIP cost estimate is $65.5 million. The total recommended recycled water system CIP cost estimate is $93.4 million. These costs only include program facilities.

7 The buildout hydraulic model was developed as a backbone system and is not an “all pipes” model; therefore, the hydraulic simulations performed may not identify all necessary water system improvements. Consequently, it is recommended that further hydraulic evaluations be performed as additional details are provided for each future development project.

Impro
vement Type Improvement Description CIP ID
Estimated
Construction Cost,
dollars(b)
CIP Cost, d
ollars
(includes mark-
ups)(c,d)
Land
Acquisition(e) Tank Si
tes BCIP-LA-T 1 sites - 285,000 Storage Reservoir(f) 5.7
MG Zone A Tank BCIP-T-A 1 L.S. 5,809,500 8,133,000 Storage Reservoir(f) 2.3
MG WWTP Diurnal Storage Tank BCIP-T-DS 1 L.S. 4,262,640 5,968,000 Booster Pump Station 5.00 mgd Zone A Expansion BCIP-PS-A 1 L.S. 1,818,715 2,546,000 Booster Pump Station 6.34 mgd for Zone F BCIP-PS-F 1 L.S. 2,016,095 2,823,000 Booster Pump Station 8.32 mgd for Zone B BCIP-PS-B 1 L.S. 2,309,610 3,233,000 Booster Pump Station 3.89 mgd for Zone D BCIP-PS-D 1 L.S. 1,654,515 2,316,000 Booster Pump Station 2.88 mgd for Zone E BCIP-PS-E 1 L.S. 1,505,630 2,108,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 8-inch diameter BCIP-PD-8 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 10-inch diameter BCIP-PD-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 12-inch diameter BCIP-PD-12 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 14-inch diameter BCIP-PD-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 16-inch diameter BCIP-PD-16 2,499 lf 837,072 1,172,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 18-inch diameter BCIP-PD-18 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 20-inch diameter BCIP-PD-20 - lf - - New Pipeline (Developed Area) 24-inch diameter BCIP-PD-24 21,852 lf 10,161,175 14,226,000 New Pipeline (Developed Area) 30-inch diameter BCIP-PD-30 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 8-inch diameter BCIP-PU-8 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 10-inch diameter BCIP-PU-10 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 12-inch diameter BCIP-PU-12 19,557 lf 4,302,643 6,024,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 14-inch diameter BCIP-PU-14 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 16-inch diameter BCIP-PU-16 5,343 lf 1,522,836 2,132,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 18-inch diameter BCIP-PU-18 9,202 lf 2,898,523 4,058,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 20-inch diameter BCIP-PU-20 - lf - - New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 24-inch diameter BCIP-PU-24 7,219 lf 2,851,449 3,992,000 New Pipeline (Undeveloped Area) 30-inch diameter BCIP-PU-30 5,882 lf 2,823,234 3,953,000 Jack and Bore Boring and Receiving Pits BCIP-JB-PIT 5 each 200,000 280,000 Jack and Bore 8-inch diameter (16-inch casing) BCIP-JB-8 - lf - - Jack and Bore 12-inch diameter (21-inch casing) BCIP-JB-12 - lf - - Jack and Bore 16-inch diameter (24-inch casing) BCIP-JB-16 - lf - - Jack and Bore 18-inch diameter (24-inch casing) BCIP-JB-18 - lf - - Jack and Bore 20-inch diameter (30-inch casing) BCIP-JB-20 - lf - - Jack and Bore 24-inch diameter (36-inch casing) BCIP-JB-24 1,234 lf 1,227,805 1,719,000 Jack and Bore 30-inch diameter (42-inch casing) BCIP-JB-30 359 lf 400,168 560,000 65,528,000$
Tab
le 10-5. Probable Construction Costs for the Recommended Buildout Recycled Water System CIP(a) Quant
ity
Shared City-side Facilities
(f) Recom
mended volume based on active volume. Cost assumes the Zone A tank will be an aboveground welded steel tank, and the WWTP tank will be a partially buried prestressed concrete tank.

Total
(a) Costs shown are presen
ted in 2020 dollars.
(b) Estimated construction costs do not yet reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate. (c) Costs include mark-ups equal to 40 percent (General Contingency: 15 percent; Design and Planning: 10 percent; Construction Management: 10 percent; and Program Administration: 5 percent). (d) Total rounded to nearest $1,000.
(e) Assumes each tank site is 1.5 acres. Cost includes Zone A Tank site.

W E S T Y O S T A

S S O C I A T E S
n\c\404
\12-18-41\e\ch10\CIP Tables
Last Revised: 04-16-22
City of Tr
acy
Citywide Water System
Master Plan Update
Chapter 10
Recommended Capital Improvement Program

10-20 City of Tracy
May 2023 Citywide Water System
n\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R-404-WMPU Master Plan Update

10.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIMING AND TRIGGERS
As described in Chapters 7 and 8 for the potable water system and Chapter 9 for the recycled water system, the construction of the capital improvements for the future potable and recycled water systems should be coordinated with the proposed schedules of new development and/or other system needs to ensure that the required infrastructure will be in place to serve future customers when needed.

Triggers for capital impr ovements vary depending on the improvement type and the location of the specific improvement project. General guidelines are summarized as follows:
• Existing system pipeline improvements are triggered by existing fire flow deficiencies and should be addressed as soon as funding is available. • Improvements that improve system operational flexibility and reliability should be prioritized. Examples of such improvements include the equipping of the City’s existing wells with ammonia addition, the JJWTP expansion and construction of Clearwell #3 at the JJWTP, and implementation of SCADA system improvements and backup power provisions.
• Pipelines which extend potable water service to currently undeveloped areas are generally triggered by development of those areas. Hydraulic evaluations for specific developments should be conducted to confirm that the proposed pipelines to serve each development are adequate.
• The NCIP-PI-1 and NCIP-PI-2 projects are triggered by new development, which is expected to occur by 2025, and should be in service before 2025. Similarly, the infrastructure needed to re-zone the existing transmission mains in Lammers Road, Schulte Road, and Hansen Road from Zone 2 to Zone 3 should be constructed before 2025.
• New valve interconnections between pressure zones are triggered when the pipelines requiring the valve connections are constructed.
• Pump stations and tanks which serve a new pressure zone with no existing facilities, such as Zones 5 and 6 in the potable water system or Zones B through F in the recycled water system, are triggered when development of the new pressure zone begins.
• New pump stations and tanks which serve an existing pressure zone are triggered when total demands within that pressure zone nearly exceeds the capacity of existing facilities. The City should continue to monitor demands within the existing pressure zones and begin design and construction of new facilities in advance of demands exceeding existing capacity.

APPENDIX A
Land Use Assumptions and
Projected Water Demands for New Developments

Gene
ral Plan Planning
Area/Common Name TAZ
Total
Acres
Adjusted
Total
Acres
Overall
Density
(Units
per
Gross
Acre)
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
Taz
2040
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
Very Low
Density
(1.5 DU
per acre
typical)
Low
Density
(4.35 DU
per acre
typical)
Medium
Density
(9
DU p
er
acre
typical)
High
Density
SFD (13
DU per
acre
typical)
High

Density

Multi-
Family
(24 DU
per acre
typical)
Total
Resid
SF DU
Total
Resid
MF DU
Indu
strial
Acres
(0.5
FAR)
Reta
il/Co
mmercial/
Office
Acres

SFDU MFDU
Reta
il/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Off
ice Acres Ind Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Instituti
onal
Acres
Sr.

Assist
Liv
Ac
res acres acres acres acres acres units acres
square
footage acres
UR 5
(Bright) (1) 527 170 108 8.2 546 10 40 38 10 10 546 0 0 0 0 10 789 100 240 100 240 0 0 0 0
UR 7 (Bright/Castro) (2) 792 112 107 5.7 150 456 40 48 606 0 0 0 0 0 Rocking Horse (3) 788 58 55 4.5 250 55 250 0 0 0 0 0
Tracy Village (4) 535 135 130 4.6 400 200 130 600 0 0 0 0 0 UR1 (5) 515 780 780 3.8 50 50 200 169 20 380 300 65 25 250 219 0 0 0 20 517 400 400 0 0 0 0 0
613 200 260 460 0 0 0 0 0
616 300 300 0 0 0 0 0
617 10 200 200 200 200 0 0 0 10
618 50 50 200 50 300 550 100 0 0 0 0
659 200 200 0 0 0 0 0
Ellis (6) 529 321 185 4.1 43 132 178 7 175 0 0 0 0 0
661 60 0 60 0 0 0 0
662 43 132 175 0 0 0 0 0
663 43 132 175 0 0 0 0 0
664 176 176 0 0 0 0 0
Avenues (8) 670 96 96 4.7 350 96 350 0 0 0 0 0
599 103 103 0 0 0 0 0
UR10 (9) 660 116 116 N/A 116 0 0 0 0 116 0
Tracy Hills (10) 573 2732 1845 3.3 200 100 7 81 876 342 8 300 0 0 0 0 9 574 27 0 0 0 0 27 0
601 700 85 700 0 0 0 85 0
682 600 600 0 0 0 0 0
683 200 150 100 450 0 0 0 0 0
684 300 300 0 0 0 0 0
685 908 200 1,108 0 0 0 0 0
686 500 500 1,000 0 0 0 0 0
687 320 320 0 0 0 0 0
688 450 450 0 0 0 0 0
689 200 600 800 0 0 0 0 0
690 200 100 300 0 0 0 0 0
691 196 0 0 0 0 196 0
692 500 500 0 0 0 0 0
693 200 185 30 385 0 0 0 0 30
1044 50 50 0 0 0 0 0
Gateway (11) 794 535 454 75 8.5 302 34 34 50 17 0 377 1,557 0 688,000 0 0 120 839 17 69 0 0 86 0 0 0
840 0 0 0 0 0 0
843 12.5 50 0 0 63 0 0 0
844 8 50 33 34 50 0 0 0 0 75
845 20 60 50 0 0 0 130 0 0
847 160 325 485 0 0 0 0 0
848 18 5 75 20 93 0 25 0 0 0
UR6 (Cordes Ranch) (12) 829 1730 971 N/A 5 40 150 0 0 150 171 830 5 20 0 0 0 25
831 50 0 0 50 0
832 50 54 50 0 0 100 54
833 110 0 0 110 0
834 20 20 0 0 40 0
835 57 0 0 0 57
Table A
-1. Land Uses with TAZ Estimates provided by City Planning Division Senior
/Assisted
Living
Institutional
(Hospital and
Medical Office)
o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 Page 1 of 5
City of Tr
acy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Gene
ral Plan Planning
Area/Common Name TAZ
Total
Acres
Adjusted
Total
Acres
Overall
Density
(Units
per
Gross
Acre)
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
Taz
2040
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
Very Low
Density
(1.5 DU
per acre
typical)
Low
Density
(4.35 DU
per acre
typical)
Medium
Density
(9
DU p
er
acre
typical)
High
Density
SFD (13
DU per
acre
typical)
High

Density

Multi-
Family
(24 DU
per acre
typical)
Total
Resid
SF DU
Total
Resid
MF DU
Indu
strial
Acres
(0.5
FAR)
Reta
il/Co
mmercial/
Office
Acres

SFDU MFDU
Reta
il/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Off
ice Acres Ind Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Instituti
onal
Acres
Sr.

Assist
Liv
Ac
res acres acres acres acres acres units acres
square
footage acres
Table A
-1. Land Uses with TAZ Estimates provided by City Planning Division Senior
/Assisted
Living
Institutional
(Hospital and
Medical Office)
836 0 0 0 0
837 50 0 0 50 0
838 74 0 0 74 0
840 143 0 0 143 0
841 50 143 0 0 193 0
UR4 (
Bright Triangle) (13) 795 190 162 5 816 34 0 816 0 0 0 43 817 22 0 0 0 0 0 22
818 22 0 0 0 0 0 22
828 80 0 0 0 0 0 80
UR3 (Catellus) (14) 819 700 700 0.1 66 40 0 0 0 0 66 40 820 40 66 0 0 0 0 66 40
821 60 66 60 0 0 0 66 0
822 67 0 0 0 0 67 0
823 67 0 0 0 0 67 0
824 45 67 0 0 0 0 67 45
825 67 0 0 0 0 67 0
1039 69 0 0 0 0 69 0
I-205 Expansion (15) 525 172 172 10.2 257 180 50 257 180 42 50 30 514 360 0 0 0 50 641 257 180 257 180 514 360 0 0 0 0
West Side Industrial (16) 528 487 485 N/A 120 240 0 0 360 0 842 200 0 0 200 0
851 45 45 0 0 90 0
East Side Industrial (17) 510 370 368 N/A 220 0 0 220 0 511 5 69 0 0 69 5
627 74 0 0 74 0
Larch Clover (18) 521 442 100 2.7 250 40 40 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 530 549 549 0 0 0 0 0
554 0 0 0 0 0 0
638 10 80 0 0 0 0 0 90
641 0 0 0 0 0 0
642 360 288 20 360 288 0 0 0 20
656 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chrisman Road (19) 647 116 113 N/A 13 100 0 0 100 13
Rocha (20) 810 91 91 8 296 431 68 23 296 431 0 0 0 0
Berg/Byron remainder (21) 796 56 44 9.3 26 39 5 26 0 0 0 0 0 1040 72 275 60 275 132 0 0 0 0
625 50 50 0 0 0 0 0
Berg Road Subdivision (22) 1040 10 10 7.1 71 10 71 0 0 0 0 0 SWC Valpico and Corral Hollow (23) 671 65 65 4.3 282 65 282 0 0 0 0 0 Kagehiro (24) 534 47 10 5 62 10 62 0 0 0 0 0
Dobler/ Maibes (25) 644 23 23 N/A 23 0 0 0 23
Holly Sugar Industrial 518 160 143 N/A 18 125 0 0 125 18 Between Holly Sugar and Arbor 636 111 100 50 50 0 0 100 0 Gabriel Estates 653
San Marco 622
654
Sterling Park 624
Alden Meadows 791
Presidio 623
Placencia Fields/CalTrans 793 30 1 0 30 0 0 0 1
Belconte 797
Lyon Crossroads 625
o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 Page 2 of 5
City of Tr
acy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Gene
ral Plan Planning
Area/Common Name TAZ
Total
Acres
Adjusted
Total
Acres
Overall
Density
(Units
per
Gross
Acre)
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
Taz
2040
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
Very Low
Density
(1.5 DU
per acre
typical)
Low
Density
(4.35 DU
per acre
typical)
Medium
Density
(9
DU p
er
acre
typical)
High
Density
SFD (13
DU per
acre
typical)
High

Density

Multi-
Family
(24 DU
per acre
typical)
Total
Resid
SF DU
Total
Resid
MF DU
Indu
strial
Acres
(0.5
FAR)
Reta
il/Co
mmercial/
Office
Acres

SFDU MFDU
Reta
il/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Off
ice Acres Ind Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Instituti
onal
Acres
Sr.

Assist
Liv
Ac
res acres acres acres acres acres units acres
square
footage acres
Table A
-1. Land Uses with TAZ Estimates provided by City Planning Division Senior
/Assisted
Living
Institutional
(Hospital and
Medical Office)
Cintra Park 640
W
oodfield Estates 1042
SWC Grant Line and Corral Hollow 639 1.06 2.73 3 0 0 1
Bridle Creek, Laurelbrook 526
Heartland / Chesapeake Bay 798
West HS / Alegre Commons 556
Summergate 555
Arnaudo Village, Rebeiro 657
East of T
racy Blvd, between I-205 &
Grant
Line (La Quinta) 553
87-room
hotel 0 0 0 0
The Cl
assics, California Espirit,
Mobil
e Home Park 537
Garden Square + Shamrock 699 4 0 0 4 0
Garden Square+ Brookview 1041
Garden Square 696
Mars Ct, Gandy Dancer area 816 4.8 18 0 0 23 0
Jim Tracey (vacant) 815 29 0 0 0 29
N. Side Valpico, inc. Tar pit 811 442 442 0 0 0 0
NEI
Amazon + Crate & Barrel North
bldg. 649 15 0 0
15 0
US Cold, other Ind. 650
Crate & Barrel South, Amazon Pkng 680 5 0 0 5 0
OSH, Seagate, United Grocers 635
Various M-
1 and M-2, SEC
MacArthur
and Grant Line 509
Red Maple Village (west half) 814
ISP (So. Si
de Valpico, b/t RR spur &
Glenbri
ar) 589
Heinz 694 11 11 0 0 0 0 22 0
Mission Court 612 200 210 0 410 0 0 0 0
Red Maple remainder 813 3 78 0 78 0 0 0 3
Sycamore Village (apts +SFDs) 652
LDR 610
Corral Hollow Estates (county) 603
old residential 541
old residential (Clover+more) 538
South
side GL, west of MA (GHC +
res) 540
LDR, Dr.

Powers Park 557
Old Res., Millenium 544
Old Res,
Lincoln Park-mostly built but
incl
udes NEC 11th & Central 545 12 0 12 0 0 0 0
S. Side old downtown, MDR, LDR,
PUD 567 20 0 20 0 0 0 0
Edgew
ood 597
Edgewood 785
Edgewood-res plus commercial site 784 2.4 8.5 0 0 0 11
Edgewood, Brookview West 786
Edgewood 787
Edgewood 598
Fairhav
en, Victoria Greens, Harvest
Glen,
Glen Creek 596
Murifield 8 & 9 607
Murifield 608
Parkside Estat
es, California
Parkside,
California Marquis 609
o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 Page 3 of 5
City of Tr
acy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Gene
ral Plan Planning
Area/Common Name TAZ
Total
Acres
Adjusted
Total
Acres
Overall
Density
(Units
per
Gross
Acre)
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
Taz
2040
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
Very Low
Density
(1.5 DU
per acre
typical)
Low
Density
(4.35 DU
per acre
typical)
Medium
Density
(9
DU p
er
acre
typical)
High
Density
SFD (13
DU per
acre
typical)
High

Density

Multi-
Family
(24 DU
per acre
typical)
Total
Resid
SF DU
Total
Resid
MF DU
Indu
strial
Acres
(0.5
FAR)
Reta
il/Co
mmercial/
Office
Acres

SFDU MFDU
Reta
il/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Off
ice Acres Ind Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Instituti
onal
Acres
Sr.

Assist
Liv
Ac
res acres acres acres acres acres units acres
square
footage acres
Table A
-1. Land Uses with TAZ Estimates provided by City Planning Division Senior
/Assisted
Living
Institutional
(Hospital and
Medical Office)
Glenbri
ar, Pebblebrook 590
County Residential 591
Tiburon Village, Katerra Apts 812 264 0 0 0 0 0
Larkspur Estates-14 units remaining 536 14 14 0 0 0 0
Eastlake 614
Elissagaray Ranch 615
Country Vista (Yosemite Vista) 695
Victoria Park 611
Santana, Centennial 651
Schul
te Ranch, Quail Glen,
Countr
ywood, Vintage Estates, Mt
Oso
568
50 50 0 0 0 0
Forest Gl
en, Mt. Diablo Estates 566
Bowti
e East, Quail Run, Pheasant
Crossing 2,
CA Cameo, CA
Collections
565
See TOD/Valley Link Plan See TOD/Valley Link Plan 0 0 0 0 Bowtie West, Ryland Junction 564 See TOD/Valley Link Plan See TOD/Valley Link Plan 0 0 0 0 Tennis Vista, RR property 621 9 0 0 9 0
Tennis Village, Harvest Ridge 620
Westchester Green, Rancho Pacific,
Alden G
len, Fox Hollow 560
Harv
est Landing, Quail Meadows,
Corr
al Hollow Estates 619
CBD 561
N. si
de 11th, b/t Parker & Central 550
City Hall, Creamery, downtown 559
S. si
dw GL, west of MA, Light
Industri
al, PUD 542 1.75 0 0 0 2
Tracy High, GHC, Res 587
West of Downtown 562

GHC, MDC, M
DR (N. of 11th, b/t
Tracy
& Parker) 551
Comm
ercial, MDR (99 cent store,
affordabl
e hsg.) 563
LDR, M
DR, GHC (N. of 11th, b/t
Lincoln & T
racy) 558
LDR (East, Acacia) 543
HDR 549
(Hospital) MDR, MDC, MO 548 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 10

HDR, PUD
, GHC, MDR, MDC (E. of
Hol
ly, N. of G.L.) 539 65 0 65 0 0 0 0
LDR, M
DR, MDC (El Pescadero
Park, S.
side Clover) 552 20 20 60 0 100 0 0 0 0
s. side GL, b/t Parker &East 546 22 0 22 0 0 0 0
GHC, HDR, LDR, POM, MDR 547
Highway Service, GHC (Kaiser, Arco) 655 5 5 0 0 0 10
M-1,
PUD, HS (N. of I-205, b/t Tracy
& Holl
y) 637 2 0 0 2 0
M-2 700
Airport 593 ? ? 0 0 0 0
Redbridge 602
I-205 Specif
ic Plan (N. part of
Harv
est) 799 1 0 0 0 1
I-205-Auto Plaza 808 3.7 0 0 0 4
I-205-Auto Plaza 806
I-205 CC-West Valley Mall+ 643 20 0 0 0 20
o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 Page 4 of 5
City of Tr
acy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Gene
ral Plan Planning
Area/Common Name TAZ
Total
Acres
Adjusted
Total
Acres
Overall
Density
(Units
per
Gross
Acre)
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2025
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
TAZ
2040
Taz
2040
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
2040
to
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
TAZ
Buildo
ut
Very Low
Density
(1.5 DU
per acre
typical)
Low
Density
(4.35 DU
per acre
typical)
Medium
Density
(9
DU p
er
acre
typical)
High
Density
SFD (13
DU per
acre
typical)
High

Density

Multi-
Family
(24 DU
per acre
typical)
Total
Resid
SF DU
Total
Resid
MF DU
Indu
strial
Acres
(0.5
FAR)
Reta
il/Co
mmercial/
Office
Acres

SFDU MFDU
Reta
il/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Off
ice Acres Ind Acres
Institutio
nal Acres
Sr As
sist
Liv Ac
res SFDU MFDU
Retail/Of
fice
Acres
Ind
Acres
Instituti
onal
Acres
Sr.

Assist
Liv
Ac
res acres acres acres acres acres units acres
square
footage acres
Table A
-1. Land Uses with TAZ Estimates provided by City Planning Division Senior
/Assisted
Living
Institutional
(Hospital and
Medical Office)
I-205-Home
Depot, Winco 803
I-205-NEC Naglee & GL 809
I-205 Outlets & Surrounding 634 5 acre office +107 room hotel 13 0 0 0 13 NEI-Yellow freight & IPT 1 632
NEI-Rados Haley 628 52 0 0 52 0
NEI-Home Depot, Ridgeline + 633 26 0 0 26 0
NEI-IPT 2, FEMA + 631 75 0 0 75 0
NEI-Seefried 629 71 0 0 71 0
NEI
Prologis, basin (NWC GL &
Paradise) 677 12 0 0 12 0
NEI
-Majestic 648 75 0 0 75 0
NEI
-Barbosa, Animal Shelter, part of
PacMed, Katerr
a 678 20 0 0 20 0
NEI-Kellogg, part of Katerra 514
NEI
-SSI, Best Buy, Prologis (Chabot
Ct) 679
Totals 9825
7333 2354 531 8154 1266 413.95 2112 60 139 6072 3279 478 957 50 751 1,898 681 68 156 16,580 4,812 1,557 176 688,000 130 3,618 1,196 Does n
ot include units/acreage already built
Does not include schools
Gateway office and industrial is really called "business commercial" in the draft Specific Plan Cordes Ranch has built 7.7 million square feet of industrial, and about 14-16 million square feet to go * Tracy Hills MUBP is 50 acres retail, 50 acres office, 80 acres medium density residential **Pursuant to Ellis DA Ellis receives 2,250 RGAs above the GMO Guidelines Category of F3, which are not yet assigned a location Larch Clover Planning Ares is largely built out-only assuming 100 acres of land use change (to retail) Office FAR is assumed at .45, and Retail is .30
Industrial FAR is assumed at .45
Purple
=Built Out TAZ
o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 Page 5 of 5
City of Tr
acy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Dwel
ling Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Park
Acres
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Dwel
ling Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed
Park Acres
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Dwel
ling Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Park
Acres
Assumed Other
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Bri
ght) TAZ Spreadsheet  
UR 7 (Bri
ght/Castro) TAZ Spreadsheet   150 34.5 30.
6 3.9 67.8 16.3
Rocking Horse Hydraulic Analysis TM  226 56.7 56.
7 102.2
Tracy Village(f) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM  400 64.1 64.
1 180.9
UR 1 TAZ Spreadsheet  50 11.5 10.
2 1.3 28.3 50 5.6 4.1 0.6 0.8 21.3
Ellis(g,h) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM  664 150.5
150.5 300.3
Avenues Hydraulic Analysis TM 
UR 10 TAZ Spre
adsheet  
Tracy Hi
lls(i) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM,
TAZ Spre
adsheet  1,073 269
.8 269.8 485.3 132 33.2 28.2 5.0 56.4
Westside Ranch Westside Draft Specific
Plan  
Cordes Ran
ch Hydraulic Analysis TM,
TAZ Spre
adsheet 
UR 4 (Bri
ght Triangle) TAZ Spreadsheet  
UR 3 (Catel
lus) TAZ Spreadsheet  
I-205
Expansion TAZ Spreadsheet  
West Si
de Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet 
East Side
Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet 
Larch-
Clover TAZ Spreadsheet  
Chrism
an Road TAZ Spreadsheet 
Rocha TAZ Spre
adsheet 
Berg/Byron
Remainder TAZ Spreadsheet 
Berg Road
Subdivision Hydraulic Analysis TM 71 9.9 8.4 1.5 27.2
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow TAZ Spreadsheet  
Kagehi
ro(g,j) Emai
l from City Planning
Divi
sion 252 47.0 47.
0 114.0
Dobler/Maibes TAZ Spreadsheet  
Holl
y Sugar Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet  
Northea
st Industrial Area Hydraulic Analysis TM
Industrial Areas Specific Plan TAZ Spreadsheet
I-205 Corridor Specific Plan TAZ Spreadsheet
Home 2 Suites Hydraulic Analysis TM
Sierra Hills Hydraulic Analysis TM
Grant Line Road Apartments Hydraulic Analysis TM
Aspire II Hydraulic Analysis TM
Harvest Hydraulic Analysis TM
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments Hydraulic Analysis TM
Barcelona Infill Hydraulic Analysis TM 51 10.2 10.2 23.1 Mountain View Tracy Municipal Services
Review, June 2019
Tracy Com
bined Cycle Power Plant
RW Conve
rsion(k) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM 
Legacy F
ields(l) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM 
Parks RW Conve
rsion(m) 2017 Ir
rigation Meters 
Infil
l (misc.) TAZ Spreadsheet 14 3.2 3.2 6.3
2,880 647 642 5 1,308 16 253 49 41 1 7 105
(b) Fo
r selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (c) Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (k) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (l) It was assumed that 50 percent of the remaining Legacy Fields acreage (from City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013) will be developed by 2025. Projected near term demands for Legacy Fields are equal to 50 percent of projected Legacy Fields demands for the 2040 and buildout time frames. (m) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Tab
le A-2. 2025 Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Project o
r Development Area Data Source(s) (a)
Parks Area
Assum
ption(b)
Assumed
Recycl
ed Water
Availability
Residential – Very Low Density Residential – Low Density Residential – Medium Density Total
(a) Data
Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc. o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 1 of
3 City of Tracy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Dwel
ling
Units
Total
Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
Dwel
ling
Units
Total
Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s
Commercial
Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s Office Acres
Assumed
Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Bri
ght)
UR 7 (Bright/Castro)
Rocking Horse
Tracy Village(f) 2.7 2.3 0.4 4.5 1.7
UR 1 100 7.7 6.5 1.2 26.2
El
lis(g,h)
Avenues
UR 10
Tr
acy Hills(i)
Westsi
de Ranch
Cordes Ranch 10.0 8.5 1.5 20.1
UR 4 (Bright Triangle)
UR 3 (Catellus)
I-205 Expansion
West Side Industrial
East Side Industrial
Larch-Clover 10.0 8.5 1.5 16.9 6.3
Chrisman Road
Rocha
Berg/Byron Remainder 72 5.0 4.3 0.8 18.7
Berg Road Subdivision
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow
Kagehiro
(g,j)
Dobler
/Maibes
Holly Sugar Industrial
Northeast Industrial Area
Industrial Areas Specific Plan
I-205 Corridor Specific Plan
Home 2 Suites 110 2.6 2.2 0.4 18.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.1
Sierra Hills 300 11.6 9.9 1.7 74.1
Grant Line Road Apartments 448 20.0 17.0 3.0 111.8
Aspire II 47 2.3 2.0 0.3 11.8
Harvest 300 17.9 15.2 2.7 76.6
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments 40 1.7 1.4 0.3 9.9
Barcelona Infill
Mountain View
Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant
RW Conve
rsion(k)
Legacy F
ields(l)
Parks RW Conve
rsion(m)
Infil
l (misc.) 284 15.1 12.9 2.3 71.8 22.5 19.1 3.4 45.1
Total 1,591 81 69 12 401 110 3 2 0 18 45 38 7 87 8 1 1 0 1 (b) Fo
r selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (c) Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (k) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (l) It was assumed that 50 percent of the remaining Legacy Fields acreage (from City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013) will be developed by 2025. Projected near term demands for Legacy Fields are equal to 50 percent of projected Legacy Fields demands for the 2040 and buildout time frames. (m) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Tab
le A-2. 2025 Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments (a) Data
Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Project o
r Development Area
Residential – High Density Residential – Very High Density Commercial Office o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 2 of
3 City of Tracy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Total Acre
s
Industrial
Acres
Assumed Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s Institutional Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Bri
ght)
UR 7 (Bright/Castro) 150 34.5 67.8 16.3
Rocking Horse 2.4 10.1 226 59.1 102.2 10.1
Tracy Village(f) 17.7 126
.1 400 66.8 203.1 127.8
UR 1 200 24.7 75.9
Ellis(g,h) 11.2 47.
2 -29 664 161.7 270.9 47.2
Avenues
UR 10
Tracy Hills(i) 11.4 50.
4 1,205 314.3 592.1
Westside Ranch
Cordes Ranch 429.7 365.2 64.5 660.7 439.7 680.8
UR 4 (Bright Triangle)
UR 3 (Catellus)
I-205 Expansion
West Side Industrial 165.0 140.3 24.8 253.7 165.0 253.7 East Side Industrial
Larch-Clover 10.0 16.9 6.3
Chrisman Road
Rocha
Berg/Byron Remainder 72 5.0 18.7
Berg Road Subdivision 71 9.9 27.2
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow
Kagehiro
(g,j) -24 252 47.
0 89.8
Dobler/Maibes
Holly Sugar Industrial
Northeast Industrial Area 259.0 220.2 38.9 398.2 259.0 398.2 Industrial Areas Specific Plan 4.8 4.1 0.7 7.4 4.8 7.4
I-205 Corridor Specific Plan
Home 2 Suites 110 3.2 19.6
Sierra Hills 300 11.6 74.1
Grant Line Road Apartments 448 20.0 111.8
Aspire II 47 2.3 11.8
Harvest 300 17.9 76.6
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments 40 1.7 9.9
Barcelona Infill 51 10.2 23.1
Mountain View
Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant
RW Conve
rsion(k) 33.7 33.
7 Legacy Fields(l) 114.3 26.
2 198.9 114.3 26.2 198.9
Parks RW Conversion(m) -318 458
.1 -318 458.1
Infill (misc.) 2.7 2.3 0.4 4.7 298 43.6 128.0
Total 859 730 129 1,320 3 2 0 5 139 77 256 -354 618 4,834 1,826 2,968 898 (c)
Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (k) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (l) It was assumed that 50 percent of the remaining Legacy Fields acreage (from City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013) will be developed by 2025. Projected near term demands for Legacy Fields are equal to 50 percent of projected Legacy Fields demands for the 2040 and buildout time frames. (b) For selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (m) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Tab
le A-2. 2025 Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Total
Potable
Water Demand,
af/yr
Total Recycled
Water Demand,
af/yr
(a) Data
Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Industr
ial Institutional Identified Parks Misc. Water Demands
Total Dwelling
Units
Total Area,
acresProject or Development Area
o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 3 of
3 City of Tracy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Dwel
ling Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Park
Acres
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Dwel
ling Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed
Park Acres
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Dwel
ling Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Park
Acres
Assumed Other
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Bri
ght) TAZ Spreadsheet   174 40.0 35.
5 4.5 78.7 18.9 342 38.1 28.1 4.3 5.7 111.9 42.0
UR 7 (Bright/Castro) TAZ Spreadsheet   174 40.0 35.
5 4.5 78.7 18.9 432 48.0 35.4 5.4 7.2 141.3 53.0
Rocking Horse Hydraulic Analysis TM  226 56.7 56.
7 102.2
Tracy Village(f) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM  600 96.2 96.
2 271.4
UR 1 TAZ Spreadsheet  450 103.4

91.9 11.6 254.8 250 27.8 20.5 3.1 4.2 106.6
Ellis(g,h) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM  958 213.5
213.5 433.3
Avenues Hydraulic Analysis TM  480 90.4 90.
4 217.1
UR 10 TAZ Spreadsheet  
Tracy Hi
lls(i) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM,
TAZ Spre
adsheet   100 66.7 59.
2 7.5 53.2 31.4 3,111 737.1 695.7 41.4 1,407.0 174.3 1,841 232.4 180.3 17.2 34.9 602.2 219.3 Westside Ranch Westside Draft Specific
Plan   2,130 210
.0 155.0 23.5 31.5 696.8 231.7
Cordes Ranch(j) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM,
TAZ Spre
adsheet  
UR 4 (Bri
ght Triangle) TAZ Spreadsheet  
UR 3 (Catel
lus) TAZ Spreadsheet  
I-205
Expansion TAZ Spreadsheet   378 42.0 31.
0 4.7 6.3 123.7 46.3
West Side Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet  
East Side
Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet 
Larch-
Clover TAZ Spreadsheet  
Chrism
an Road TAZ Spreadsheet 
Rocha TAZ Spre
adsheet 
Berg/Byron
Remainder TAZ Spreadsheet 
Berg Road
Subdivision Hydraulic Analysis TM 71 9.9 8.4 1.5 27.2
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow TAZ Spreadsheet  
Kagehi
ro(g,k) Emai
l from City Planning
Divi
sion 252 47.0 47.
0 114.0
Dobler/Maibes TAZ Spreadsheet  
Holl
y Sugar Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet  
Northea
st Industrial Area Hydraulic Analysis TM
Industrial Areas Specific Plan TAZ Spreadsheet
I-205 Corridor Specific Plan TAZ Spreadsheet
Home 2 Suites Hydraulic Analysis TM
Sierra Hills Hydraulic Analysis TM
Grant Line Road Apartments Hydraulic Analysis TM
Aspire II Hydraulic Analysis TM
Harvest Hydraulic Analysis TM
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments Hydraulic Analysis TM
Barcelona Infill Hydraulic Analysis TM 51 10.2 10.2 23.1 Mountain View Tracy Municipal Services
Review, June 2019 165 156.0 156.0 87.7
Tracy Com
bined Cycle Power Plant
RW Conve
rsion(l) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM 
Legacy F
ields(m) Hydraul
ic Analysis TM 
Parks RW Conve
rsion(n) 2017 Ir
rigation Meters 
Infil
l (misc.) TAZ Spreadsheet 14 3.2 3.2 6.3
265 223 215 7 141 31 6,490 1,438 1,376 62 2,987 212 5,444 608 459 58 91 1,810 592 (b) Fo
r selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (c) Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Miscellaneous water use for Cordes Ranch represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable irrigation demands to recycled water demands once recycled water service is extended to Cordes Ranch. (k) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (l) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (m) Remaining Legacy Fields acreage to be developed is from the City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013. Projected demands for Legacy Fields are equal to total demands projected in the Water Supply Assessment for the Holly Sugar Sports Park (West Yost Associates, June 2009) minus the existing recycled water demand for Legacy Fields. (n) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Tab
le A-3. 2040 Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Project o
r Development Area Data Source(s) (a)
Parks Area
Assum
ption(b)
Assumed
Recycl
ed Water
Availability
Residential – Very Low Density Residential – Low Density Residential – Medium Density Total
(a) Data
Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc. o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 1 of
3 City of Tracy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Dwel
ling
Units
Total
Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
Dwel
ling
Units
Total
Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s
Commercial
Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s Office Acres
Assumed
Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Bri
ght) 370 20.0 17.0 3.0 85.7 12.6
UR 7 (Bright/Castro)
Rocking Horse
Tracy Village(f) 4.0 3.4 0.6 6.8 2.5
UR 1 150 11.5 9.8 1.7 39.
4 10.0 8.5 1.5 20.1
Ellis(g,h) 14.8 12.
6 2.2 25.0 9.3
Avenues
UR 10
Tracy Hills(i) 125 7.0 6.0 1.1 29.0 4.4 40.
6 34.5 6.1 68.7 25.6 45.5 38.7 6.8 64.2 28.7
Westside Ranch 414 26.0 22.1 3.9 95.9 16.4 149.0 126.7 22.4 252.2 94.1 Cordes Ranch(j) 55.0 46.
8 8.3 93.1 34.7 69.0 58.7 10.4 97.3 43.6
UR 4 (Bright Triangle)
UR 3 (Catellus)
I-205 Expansion 496 29.0 24.6 4.3 114.9 18.3 50.0 42.5 7.5 84.6 31.6 West Side Industrial
East Side Industrial 5.0 4.3 0.8 10.0
Larch-Clover 10.0 8.5 1.5 16.9 6.3
Chrisman Road
Rocha
Berg/Byron Remainder 72 5.0 4.3 0.8 18.7
Berg Road Subdivision
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow
Kagehiro
(g,k)
Dobler
/Maibes 23.0 19.6 3.5 38.9 14.5
Holly Sugar Industrial 18.0 15.3 2.7 30.5 11.4
Northeast Industrial Area
Industrial Areas Specific Plan 32.0 27.2 4.8 64.2
I-205 Corridor Specific Plan 37.7 32.0 5.7 75.7
Home 2 Suites 110 2.6 2.2 0.4 18.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.1
Sierra Hills 300 11.6 9.9 1.7 74.1
Grant Line Road Apartments 448 20.0 17.0 3.0 111.8
Aspire II 47 2.3 2.0 0.3 11.8
Harvest 300 17.9 15.2 2.7 76.6
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments 40 1.7 1.4 0.3 9.9
Barcelona Infill
Mountain View
Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant
RW Conve
rsion(l)
Legacy F
ields(m)
Parks RW Conve
rsion(n)
Infil
l (misc.) 538 28.7 24.4 4.3 136.1 99.4 84.5 14.9 199.6
Total 3,300 181 154 27 804 52 110 3 2 0 18 549 466 82 986 230 115 98 17 163 72 (b) Fo
r selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (c) Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Miscellaneous water use for Cordes Ranch represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable irrigation demands to recycled water demands once recycled water service is extended to Cordes Ranch. (k) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (l) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (m) Remaining Legacy Fields acreage to be developed is from the City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013. Projected demands for Legacy Fields are equal to total demands projected in the Water Supply Assessment for the Holly Sugar Sports Park (West Yost Associates, June 2009) minus the existing recycled water demand for Legacy Fields. (n) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Tab
le A-3. 2040 Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Project o
r Development Area
Residential – High Density Residential – Very High Density Commercial Office (a) Data
Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc. o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 2 of
3 City of Tracy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Total Acre
s
Industrial
Acres
Assumed Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s Institutional Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d) Total Acre
s
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
PW Dem
and,
af/yr(c)
RW Dem
and,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Bri
ght) 886 98.1 276.3 73.5
UR 7 (Bright/Castro) 606 88.0 220.0 71.8
Rocking Horse 2.4 10.1 226 59.1 102.2 10.1
Tracy Village(f) 17.7 156
.0 600 100.2 295.8 158.5
UR 1 850 152.8 420.8
Ellis(g,h) 28.8

24.5 4.3 35.2 18.2 16.0 13.6 2.4 22.6 10.1 16.7 70.3 -29 958 289.8 486.7 108.0 Avenues 4.6 19.4 480 95.0 217.1 19.4
UR 10
Tracy Hills(i) 196.0
166.6 29.4 239.6 123.8 18.6 15.8 2.8 26.2 11.7 27.9 117.5 5,177 1,371.7 2,490.1 736.9 Westside Ranch 150.0 127.5 22.5 211.6 94.7 2,544 535.0 1,256.4 436.9 Cordes Ranch(j) 1,219.
7 1,036.7 183.0 1,490.9 770.3 -84 83.8 1,343.7 1,597.5 932.5 UR 4 (Bright Triangle)
UR 3 (Catellus)
I-205 Expansion 874 121.0 323.2 96.2
West Side Industrial 650.0 552.5 97.5 794.5 410.5 650.0 794.5 410.5 East Side Industrial 363.0 308.6 54.5 558.2 368.0 568.2 Larch-Clover 10.0 16.9 6.3
Chrisman Road
Rocha
Berg/Byron Remainder 72 5.0 18.7
Berg Road Subdivision 71 9.9 27.2
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow
Kagehiro
(g,k) -24 252 47.
0 89.8
Dobler/Maibes 23.0 38.9 14.5
Holly Sugar Industrial 125.0 106.3 18.8 152.8 78.9 143.0 183.3 90.3 Northeast Industrial Area 468.0 397.8 70.2 719.6 468.0 719.6 Industrial Areas Specific Plan 4.8 4.1 0.7 7.4 36.8 71.6 I-205 Corridor Specific Plan 37.7 75.7
Home 2 Suites 110 3.2 19.6
Sierra Hills 300 11.6 74.1
Grant Line Road Apartments 448 20.0 111.8
Aspire II 47 2.3 11.8
Harvest 300 17.9 76.6
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments 40 1.7 9.9
Barcelona Infill 51 10.2 23.1
Mountain View 165 156.0 87.7
Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant
RW Conve
rsion(l) 33.7 33.
7 Legacy Fields(m) 228.5 52.
3 397.9 228.5 52.3 397.9
Parks RW Conversion(n) -318 458
.1 -318 458.1
Infill (misc.) 81.0 68.9 12.2 124.5 2.7 2.3 0.4 4.7 552 215.1 471.3 Total 3,136 2,666 470 4,123 1,402 187 159 28 265 117 280 52 615 -438 732 15,609 6,719 10,911 4,055 (c)
Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Miscellaneous water use for Cordes Ranch represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable irrigation demands to recycled water demands once recycled water service is extended to Cordes Ranch. (k) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (l) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (m) Remaining Legacy Fields acreage to be developed is from the City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013. Projected demands for Legacy Fields are equal to total demands projected in the Water Supply Assessment for the Holly Sugar Sports Park (West Yost Associates, June 2009) minus the existing recycled water demand for Legacy Fields.

Tab
le A-3. 2040 Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Total
Potable
Water Demand,
af/yr
Total Recycled
Water Demand,
af/yr
Total Area,
acres
(b) Fo
r selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (n) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Project o
r Development Area
Industrial Institutional
(a) Data
Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Identi
fied Parks Misc. Water Demands
Total Dwelling
Units
o\
c\404\12-18-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 3 of
3 City of Tracy
Citywide Water System Master Plan
Dwellin
g Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Park
Acres
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d) Dwellin
g Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed
Park Acres
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d) Dwellin
g Units Total Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Park
Acres
Assumed Other
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Brigh
t) TAZ Spreadsheet   174 40
.0 35.5 4.5 78.7 18.9 342 38.1 28.1 4.3 5.7 111.9 42.0
UR 7 (Bright/Castro) TAZ Spreadsheet   174 40
.0 35.5 4.5 78.7 18.9 432 48.0 35.4 5.4 7.2 141.3 53.0
Rocking Horse Hydraulic Analysis TM  226 56
.7 56.7 102.2
Tracy Village(f) Hydrau
lic Analysis TM  600 96
.2 96.2 271.4
UR 1 TAZ Spreadsheet   570 38

0.0 337.4 42.6 303.0 179.2 1,255 288.5 256.2 32.3 567.6 136.1 535 59.4 43.9 6.7 8.9 175.0 65.6 Ellis(g,h) Hydrau
lic Analysis TM  958 21

3.5 213.5 433.3
Avenues Hydraulic Analysis TM  480 90
.4 90.4 217.1
UR 10 TAZ Spreadsheet  
Tracy Hill
s(i) Hydrau
lic Analysis TM,
TAZ Sprea
dsheet   122 81
.3 72.2 9.1 64.9 38.4 3,439 812.5 762.7 49.8 1,555.4 209.9 3,491 415.7 315.6 37.8 62.4 1,142.0 421.6 Westside Westside Draft Specific
Plan   2,13
0 210.0 155.0 23.5 31.5 696.8 231.7
Cordes Ranch(j) Hydrau
lic Analysis TM,
TAZ Sprea
dsheet  
UR 4 (Brigh
t Triangle) TAZ Spreadsheet  
UR 3 (Sand
hu) TAZ Spreadsheet   60 40.0

35.5 4.5 31.9 18.9
I-205 Expansion TAZ Spreadsheet   378 42
.0 31.0 4.7 6.3 123.7 46.3
West Side Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet  
East Side
Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet  
Larc
h-Clover TAZ Spreadsheet   375 25

0.0 222.0 28.0 199.3 117.9 174 40.0 35.5 4.5 78.7 18.9 360 40.0 29.5 4.5 6.0 117.8 44.1 Chrisman Road TAZ Spreadsheet  
Rocha TAZ Sprea
dsheet   296 68
.0 60.4 7.6 133.9 32.1
Berg/Byron Remainder TAZ Spreadsheet  411 39
.0 28.8 4.4 5.9 169.3
Berg Road Subdivision Hydraulic Analysis TM 71 9.9 8.4 1.5 27.2 SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow TAZ Spreadsheet   282 65
.0 57.7 7.3 127.5 30.7
Kagehiro(g,k) Emai
l from City Planning
Division 252 47
.0 47.0 114.0
Dobler/Maibes TAZ Spreadsheet  
Holly
Sugar Industrial TAZ Spreadsheet  
Northea
st Industrial Area Hydraulic Analysis TM
Industrial Areas Specific Plan TAZ Spreadsheet
I-205 Corridor Specific Plan TAZ Spreadsheet
Home 2 Suites Hydraulic Analysis TM
Sierra Hills Hydraulic Analysis TM
Grant Line Road Apartments Hydraulic Analysis TM
Aspire II Hydraulic Analysis TM
Harvest Hydraulic Analysis TM
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments Hydraulic Analysis TM
Barcelona Infill Hydraulic Analysis TM 51 10.2 10.2 23.1 Mountain View Tracy Municipal Services
Review, June 2019 165 156.0 156.0 87.7
Tracy Combined Cycle Power
Plant
RW Conversion(l) Hydrau
lic Analysis TM 
Lega
cy Fields(m) Hydrau
lic Analysis TM 
Parks
RW Conversion(n) 2017
Irrigation Meters 
Inf
ill (misc.) TAZ Spreadsheet 14 3.2 3.2 6.3
1,292 907 823 84 687 354 8,375 1,871 1,761 110 3,788 465 8,150 902 676 91 135 2,705 904 (b)
For selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (c) Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Miscellaneous water use for Cordes Ranch represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable irrigation demands to recycled water demands once recycled water service is extended to Cordes Ranch. (k) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (l) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (m) Remaining Legacy Fields acreage to be developed is from the City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013. Projected demands for Legacy Fields are equal to total demands projected in the Water Supply Assessment for the Holly Sugar Sports Park (West Yost Associates, June 2009) minus the existing recycled water demand for Legacy Fields. (n) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Total
Proj
ect or Development Area Data Source(s) (a)
Parks
Area
Assumption(b)
Table
A-4. Buildout Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Resident
ial – Very Low Density
Assumed
Recycled Water
Availability
Residential – Low Density Residential – Medium Density
(a)
Data Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc. o\c\404\12-18
-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 1 of 3
City of Tracy
City
wide Water System Master Plan
Dwellin
g
Units
Total
Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d)
Dwellin
g
Units
Total
Acres
Residential
Acres
Assumed Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d) Total
Acres
Commercial
Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d) Total
Acres Office Acres
Ass
umed Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Brigh
t) 370 20.0 17.0 3.0 85.7 12.6 10.0 8.5 1.5 16.9 6.3
UR 7 (Bright/Castro)
Rocking Horse
Tracy Village(f) 4.0 3.
4 0.6 6.8 2.5
UR 1 519 39.9 33.9 6.0 120.3 25.2 30.0 25.5 4.5 50.8 18.9 Ellis(g,h) 14.8 12
.6 2.2 25.0 9.3
Avenues
UR 10
Tracy Hills(i) 125

7.0 6.0 1.1 29.0 4.4 40.6 34.5 6.1 68.7 25.6 45.5 38.7 6.8 64.2 28.7 Westside 414 26.0 22.1 3.9 95.9 16.4 149.0 126.7 22.4 252.2 94.1 Cordes Ranch(j) 55.0 46
.8 8.3 93.1 34.7 126.0 107.1 18.9 177.7 79.6
UR 4 (Bright Triangle) 816 34.0 28.9 5.1 189.1 21.5 80.0 68.0 12.0 135.4 50.5 44.0 37.4 6.6 62.1 27.8 UR 3 (Sandhu) 45.0 38.3 6.8 76.2 28.4 40.0 34.0 6.0 56.4 25.3 I-205 Expansion 1,370 80.0 68.0 12.0 317.4 50.5 50.0 42.5 7.5 84.6 31.6 West Side Industrial
East Side Industrial 5.0 4.3 0.8 8.5 3.2
Larch-Clover 288 12.0 10.2 1.8 66.7 7.6 110.0 93.5 16.5 186.2 69.5 Chrisman Road 13.0 11.1 2.0 22.0 8.2
Rocha 431 23.0 19.6 3.5 99.9 14.5
Berg/Byron Remainder 72 5.0 4.3 0.8 18.7
Berg Road Subdivision
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow
Kagehiro(g,k)
Dobler/Mai
bes 23.0 19.6 3.5 38.9 14.5
Holly Sugar Industrial 18.0 15.3 2.7 30.5 11.4
Northeast Industrial Area
Industrial Areas Specific Plan 520 27.7 23.6 4.2 131.5 32.0 27.2 4.8 64.2 I-205 Corridor Specific Plan 37.7 32.0 5.7 75.7
Home 2 Suites 110 2.6 2.2 0.4 18.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.1
Sierra Hills 300 11.6 9.9 1.7 74.1
Grant Line Road Apartments 448 20.0 17.0 3.0 111.8
Aspire II 47 2.3 2.0 0.3 11.8
Harvest 300 17.9 15.2 2.7 76.6
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments 40 1.7 1.4 0.3 9.9
Barcelona Infill
Mountain View
Tracy Combin
ed Cycle Power Plant
RW Con
version(l)
Lega
cy Fields(m)
Parks
RW Conversion(n)
Inf
ill (misc.) 973 51.9 44.1 7.8 246.1 100.4 85.3 15.1 201.6 Total 7,033 380 323 57 1,685 153 110 3 2 0 18 818 695 123 1,437 409 256 218 38 361 161 (b)
For selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (c) Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Miscellaneous water use for Cordes Ranch represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable irrigation demands to recycled water demands once recycled water service is extended to Cordes Ranch. (k) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (l) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (m) Remaining Legacy Fields acreage to be developed is from the City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013. Projected demands for Legacy Fields are equal to total demands projected in the Water Supply Assessment for the Holly Sugar Sports Park (West Yost Associates, June 2009) minus the existing recycled water demand for Legacy Fields. (n) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Project o
r Development Area
Residential – Very High Density
Table
A-4. Buildout Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Resident
ial – High Density Commercial Office
(a)
Data Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc. o\c\404\12-18
-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 2 of 3
City of Tracy
City
wide Water System Master Plan
Total
Acres
Industrial
Acres
Assumed Irrigated
Acres(e)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d) Total
Acres Institutional Acres
Assumed
Irrigated Acres(e)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d) Total
Acres
PW Demand,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d)
PW Demand
,
af/yr(c)
RW Demand
,
af/yr(d)
UR 5 (Brigh
t) 886 108.1 293.2 79.9
UR 7 (Bright/Castro) 606 88.0 220.0 71.8
Rocking Horse 2.4 10.1 226 59.1 102.2 10.1
Tracy Village(f) 17.7 15

6.0 600 100.2 295.8 158.5
UR 1 2,879 797.9 1,216.6 425.0
Ellis(g,h) 28.8

24.5 4.3 35.2 18.2 16.0 13.6 2.4 22.6 10.1 16.7 70.3 7.1 958 289.8 523.2 108.0 Avenues 4.6 19.4 480 95.0 217.1 19.4
UR 10 116.0 98.6 17.4 141.8 73.3 116.0 141.8 73.3
Tracy Hills(i) 308.
0 261.8 46.2 376.5 194.5 18.6 15.8 2.8 26.2 11.7 27.9 117.5 7,177 1,757.2 3,326.8 1,052.4 Westside 150.0 127.5 22.5 211.6 94.7 2,544 535.0 1,256.4 436.9 Cordes Ranch(j) 1,21

9.7 1,036.7 183.0 1,490.9 770.3 -84 83.8 1,400.7 1,677.9 968.5 UR 4 (Bright Triangle) 816 158.0 386.5 99.8
UR 3 (Sandhu) 535.0 454.8 80.3 654.0 337.9 60 660.0 818.4 410.4 I-205 Expansion 1,748 172.0 525.7 128.4
West Side Industrial 650.0 552.5 97.5 794.5 410.5 650.0 794.5 410.5 East Side Industrial 363.0 308.6 54.5 443.7 229.3 368.0 452.2 232.4 Larch-Clover 1,197 452.0 648.7 257.9
Chrisman Road 100.0 85.0 15.0 122.2 63.2 113.0 144.2 71.4 Rocha 727 91.0 233.7 46.6
Berg/Byron Remainder 483 44.0 188.0
Berg Road Subdivision 71 9.9 27.2
SWC Valpico & Corral Hollow 282 65.0 127.5 30.7
Kagehiro(g,k) -24 252 47
.0 89.8
Dobler/Maibes 23.0 38.9 14.5
Holly Sugar Industrial 125.0 106.3 18.8 152.8 78.9 143.0 183.3 90.3 Northeast Industrial Area 468.0 397.8 70.2 719.6 468.0 719.6 Industrial Areas Specific Plan 26.8 22.8 4.0 41.2 520 86.5 237.0 I-205 Corridor Specific Plan 37.7 75.7
Home 2 Suites 110 3.2 19.6
Sierra Hills 300 11.6 74.1
Grant Line Road Apartments 448 20.0 111.8
Aspire II 47 2.3 11.8
Harvest 300 17.9 76.6
321 E. Grant Line Rd Apartments 40 1.7 9.9
Barcelona Infill 51 10.2 23.1
Mountain View 165 156.0 87.7
Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant
RW Con
version(l) 33.7 33
.7
Legacy Fields(m) 228.
5 52.3 397.9 228.5 52.3 397.9
Parks RW Conversion(n) -432 59

3.5 -432 593.5
Infill (misc.) 153.0 130.1 23.0 235.3 2.7 2.3 0.4 4.7 987 311.3 694.0 Total 4,093 3,479 614 5,208 2,176 187 159 28 265 117 280 52 615 -516 867 24,960 9,698 15,691 6,222 (c)
Includes 9.6% Unaccounted-for Water (UAFW).
(d) Includes 5.0% UAFW.
(e) Assumes that 15 percent of total gross acres will be landscaped and irrigated. If available, recycled water was used to meet irrigated area demands. (f) Miscellaneous potable water demands for Tracy Village are from existing residential units to be annexed as part of the Project. Miscellaneous recycled water demand for Tracy Village is to fill the lakes which will be constructed as part of the project. (g) Projected land use data includes dwelling units and acreage developed by 2017. (h) Land use data for Ellis includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Ellis represents projected demands for the Aquatic Center minus 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (i) Land use data from hydraulic analysis TMs was used for Tracy Hills Phase 1. The parks acreage assumption was not applied to Tracy Hills Phase 1 because the available land use data specifically identified parks. The parks acreage assumption was applied to the remaining phases of Tracy Hills, which used land use data from the TAZ spreadsheet. (j) Miscellaneous water use for Cordes Ranch represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable irrigation demands to recycled water demands once recycled water service is extended to Cordes Ranch. (k) Land use data for Kagehiro includes dwelling units constructed by 2017. Miscellaneous potable water demand for Kagehiro represents 2017 metered water use. The 2017 metered use was subtracted from the calculated water demands for the entire development to account for the portion of the development constructed by 2017. (l) Demands for the Tracy Combined Cycle Power Plant Recycled Water Conversion are from City of Tracy Recycled Water Project - Projected Recycled Water Demands TM, West Yost Associates, October 11, 2016. (m) Remaining Legacy Fields acreage to be developed is from the City of Tracy Parks Master Plan, Table A-1, April 2013. Projected demands for Legacy Fields are equal to total demands projected in the Water Supply Assessment for the Holly Sugar Sports Park (West Yost Associates, June 2009) minus the existing recycled water demand for Legacy Fields. (a) Data Source abbreviations:

TAZ Spreadsheet - data from Land Uses with TAZ Estimates_06_23_2021_2025_2040_BU_Independent.xlsx spreadsheet received from the City Planning Division in June 2021 (Table A-1).

Hydraulic Analysis TM - data from a previously prepared hydraulic analysis technical memorandum prepared by either West Yost Associates or Blackwater Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Total
Dwelling
Units
Total Area,
acres
Total Potable
Water Demand,
af/yr
Total Recycled
Water Demand,
af/yrProject or Development Area
Misc. Water DemandsIdentified Parks
(b)
For selected projects and development areas, it was assumed that 11.2% of the total acres in very low, low, and medium density residential land uses will be developed as parks. These park acres are in addition to the identified parks in the Rocking Horse, Ellis, Avenues, Tracy Hills Phase 1, and Legacy Fields developments. If available, recycled water was used to meet park demands. (n) Represents the transfer of 2017 metered potable demands for selected existing parks and irrigated areas to recycled water demands. Projected recycled water demands for these areas are larger than existing potable water demands due to current potable water conservation practices. Refer to Chapter 9 for a full list of irrigated areas projected to be converted to recycled water use.

Table
A-4. Buildout Time Frame - Land Use Assumptions and Projected Water Demands for New Developments Institu
tionalIndustrial
o\c\404\12-18
-41\eng\Ch3\Appendix 3A.xlsx
Last Revised: 07-2021 3 of 3
City of Tracy
City
wide Water System Master Plan

APPENDIX B
JJWTP Expansion Project
Site Plan, Process Schematic, and Hydraulic Profile

APPENDIX C
City of Tracy
Existing Potable Water System Hydraulic Grade Schematic EL 200'
EL 300'
EL 100'
EL 0'
EL 400'
EL 500'
EL 200'
EL 300'
EL 100'
EL 0'
EL 400'
EL 500'
HGL 195 FT ±
HGL 270 FT ±
HGL 368 FT ±
ZONE 1ZONE 2ZONE 3
Min: 40 psi Max: 75 psi
Min: 40 psi Max: 85 psi
Min: 55 psi Max: 95 psi
"NEI"
Tank and PS

2.4 MG
Elev. ± 38.5 ft
"Linne"
Tank and PS

7.1 MG
Elev. ± 107.5 ft
PRS #1 - #6
U/S: Z2
D/S: Z1
JJWTP (see Note 3)
Clearwell #2 4.0 MG
Z1 PS
Z2 PS
Z3 PS
Z4 PS
Elev. ± 200 ft
"Cordes"
Tank and PS

2.0 MG
Elev. ± 149 ft
Summit Drive PRS (active)
Cordes PRS, Promontory Parkway
PRS (activated for IPC zone split)
U/S: Z3
D/S: Z2
(SERVICE ELEVATIONS: 150 FT - 245 FT) (SERVICE ELEVATIONS: 75 FT - 150 FT) (SERVICE ELEVATIONS: 0 FT - 75 FT) Appendix C
Existing Potable Water System
Hydraulic Grade Schematic
City of Tracy
Water System
Master Plan Update
Notes:

1. Elevations on this figure are from various sources and should not be used for design purposes.

2. Horizontal spacing is for illustrative purposes and is not to scale.

3. JJWTP Facilities do not currently supply Zone 3 directly.

4. Ellis Reduced Zone (not shown) is served from Zone 3 via the Summit Drive PRV. It has a hydraulic grade of approximately 323 ft, and a service elevation range of 140 ft - 185 ft.

5. Last updated December 2019.

N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\CAD\Figures\Appendix7B_HGL.dwg 11/2/2020 1:08 PM nhoman

APPENDIX D
Lammers Road and Hood Way Design Recommendation
Technical Memoranda
Note: The Technical Memoranda in this Appendix were written using the old pressure zone nomenclature. Please note that “City -side Pressur e Zone 3” is now referred to as “Pressure Zone 3” using the updated pressure zone nomenclature discussed in Chapters 7 and 8. 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 150 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Phone 925.426.2580 Fax 530.756.5991 westyost.com

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DATE: September 25, 2019 Project No.: 404-60-19-47
SENT VIA: EMAIL

TO: Zabih Zaca, City of Tracy

CC: Robert Armijo, City of Tracy
Paul Verma, City of Tracy
Al Gali, City of Tracy
Nanda Gottiparthy, SNG & Associates, Inc.

FROM: Nathaniel Homan, PE, RCE #89903
Jim Connell, PE, RCE #63052

REVIEWED BY: Amy Kwong, PE, RCE #73213

SUBJECT: Design Recommendations for Lammers Road Pipeline

In a technical memorandum (TM) prepared for the City of Tracy (City) titled Hydraulic Evaluation of International Park of Commerce (IPC) Buildings 3, 4, and 12, dated May 18, 2017 (May 2017 TM), West Yost Associates ( West Yost) recommended that 3,440 lineal feet (lf) of 20 -inch diameter Pressure Zone 2 (Zone 2) transmission main be constructed in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road in addition to the 3,025 lf of City -side Pressure Zone 3 (Zone 3) transmission main to be constructed in La mmers Road between the northwest corner of the Ellis Specific Plan development and Valpico Road. The purpose of this recommended Zone 2 pipeline improvement was to maintain the Zone 2 transmission main system after the existing 24 -inch diameter Zone 2 transmission main in the above-mentioned section of Lammers Road is re-zoned to Zone 3. The key figures from the May 2017 TM are included for reference as Attachment 1.

This TM summarizes the findings and conclusions of West Yost’s technical evaluation of four alternatives to the recommendations from the May 2017 TM:
• Alternative 1: Re-zone the existing 24-inch diameter Zone 2 transmission main in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road without any improvements.

This alternative was previously evaluated in the May 2017 TM, but system conditions have changed with additional development. Therefore, this condition was re-evaluated to confirm if improvements are required.
• Alternative 2: Re-zone the existing 24-inch diameter Zone 2 transmission main in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road and construct a new Pressure Regulating Station (PRS) at the intersection of Lammers Road and Schulte Road to support Zone 2.

Technical Memorandum
September 25, 2019

o\c\404\60-19-47\wp\Lammers\061119_1
• Alternative 3: Construct a new Zone 3 transmission main in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road instead of re-zoning the existing transmission main. • Alternative 4: Re-zone the existing 24-inch diameter Zone 2 transmission main in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road and construct a new Zone 2 transmission main in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road (similar to the recommendation from the May 2017 TM).

West Yost first performed hydraulic modeling 1 and reviewed plans and record drawings of the construction areas to determine which of the four alternatives are both hydraulically feasible and constructible. West Yost then compared the various alternatives and develop ed design recommendations for the preferred alternative. It should be noted that all evaluations performed for this TM assume that the improvements identified in the evaluation for Design Recommendations for Hood Way Pipeline have been completed.

This TM i s submitted in accordance with West Yost’s January 2019 Scope of Services. The following sections summarize our findings and conclusions:
• Alternative 1: No New Pipeline
• Alternative 2: New PRS (No New Pipeline)
• Alternative 3: New Zone 3 Pipeline
• Alternative 4: New Zone 2 Pipeline
• Comparison of Alternatives and Conclusions
ALTERNATIVE 1: NO NEW PIPELINE
In Alternative 1, no new infrastructure would be constructed in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road. The existing 24-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline in Lammers Road south of Schulte Road would be re -zoned to Zone 3 by closing existing valves located at the intersection of Valpico Road and Lammers Road and at the intersection of Schulte Road and Lammers Road. A depiction of Alternative 1 is shown on Figure 1.

While Alternative 1 is much less expensive than constructing the additional pipeline recommended in the May 2017 TM, re -zoning the existing pipeline in Lammers Road without providing a new Zone 2 transmission line would significantly impact the ability of the Zone 2 system west of Corral Hollow Road to convey large quantities of water. Increased headloss in the water distribution

1 Hydraulic modeling was performed using the City’s developer hydraulic model, which includes all of the previously evaluated development projects that have been proposed and is separate from the 2012 Water System Master Plan model. It is assumed that the Cordes Tank and Booster Pump Station are operational and that the 16-inch diameter Zone 2 transmission main connection to Lammers Road is in service. Planning and modeling criteria used to evaluate the various alternatives are based on the system performanc e and operational criteria developed in the 2012 WSMP and are provided in Attachment 2 for reference.

Technical Memorandum
September 25, 2019

o\c\404\60-19-47\wp\Lammers\061119_1
pipelines due to the lack of a major transmission main would cause a decrease in pressure in this portion of the Zone 2 system. Additional consequences from Alternative 1 include the following:

1. PRS #6 would no longer provide supply to Zone 1 during a normal maximum day demand condition. This is because the Zone 2 pressure upstream of PRS #6 would fall below the pressure sustaining setting of 78 pounds per square inch (psi).

2. Zone 1 would not meet fire flow requirements at Kimball High School during a maximum day demand condition2, as shown on Figure 2. This is because PRS #6 would no longer be available to support Zone 1 as discussed in Item 1 above.

3. Zone 2 would also not meet fire flow requirements in portions of the IPC during a maximum day demand condition, as shown on Figure 2. Some hydrants in the IPC are located at the highest elevations in Zone 2 and the decrease in Zone 2 pressure and reduced transmission capacity of the Zone 2 system would cause some locations in the IPC to be deficient in meeting fire flow requirements.

4. The existing 24-inch diameter pipeline in Valpico Road would become a dead-end and would experience a decrease in water quality.

Alternative 1 is not recommended because it results in fire flow deficiencies within Zone 1 and Zone 2 and water quality concerns in the existing 24-inch diameter pipeline in Valpico Road.

ALTERNATIVE 2: NEW PRS (NO NEW PIPELINE)
After evaluating Alternative 1, West Yost evaluated whether a new Zone 3 to Zone 2 PRS at the intersection of Lammers Road and Schulte Road would be a viable alternative to a new transmission pipeline (i.e. Alternatives 3 and 4) and a lleviate the fire flow deficiencies in Zone 1 and Zone 2 that were observed in the Alternative 1 evaluation.

To resolve the fire flow deficiencies in Zone 1, the proposed Zone 3 to Zone 2 PRS would have to provide enough supply to sustain pressure in Zone 2 sufficiently to allow PRS #6 to open and support Zone 1. However, as stated above, the Zone 2 pressure upstream of PRS #6 would fall below the pressure sustaining setting of 78 psi during a normal maximum day demand condition if the Zone 2 transmission main in Lammers Road were re -zoned without constructing a new Zone 2 transmission main. Therefore, any PRS designed to alleviate the fire flow deficiencies in Zone 1 would have to provide sufficient flow from Zone 3 to Zone 2 continuously under normal operating conditions so that the pressure upstream of PRS #6 would remain above the pressure sustaining setting. However, operating the new Zone 3 to Zone 2 PRS in this manner would require at least 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm) of flow through the new PRS from Zone 3 to Zone 2 under a maximum day demand condition, which would significantly increase the demand on Zone 3 facilities that were not designed to accommodate this additional flow. Therefore, Alternative 2 is not recommended.

2 Available fire flow simulations for the evaluated alternatives was performed during a maximum day demand condition while maintaining 30 psi residual system pressure.

Technical Memorandum
September 25, 2019

o\c\404\60-19-47\wp\Lammers\061119_1
ALTERNATIVE 3: NEW ZONE 3 PIPELINE
In Alternative 3, 3,240 lf of 24 -inch diameter Zone 3 pipeline would be constructed in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road, while t he existing 24-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road wo uld continue to serve Zone 2. An existing valve at the intersection of Schulte Road and Lammers Road would be used to isolate the Zone 2 and Zone 3 transmission lines. The proposed Zone 3 pipeline south of Valpico Road would not connect to the existing pipelines at the intersection of Valpico Road and Lammers Road, but would instead connect to the recommended Zone 3 pipeline. Refer to Figure 3A for a depiction of Alternative 3. A detailed schematic of the connection to existing pipelines which would be required to construct Alternative 3 is shown on Figure 3B.

As part of Alternative 3, West Yost also evaluated the feasibility of constructing 830 lf of new 20-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline to connect the existing 24 -inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline at the intersection of Lammers Road and Schulte Road to the existing 20-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline at the intersection of Lammers Road and Redbridge Road.

In the existing system, the 24-inch and 20-inch diameter transmission mains in Lammers Road are interrupted by 830 lf of 12-inch diameter pipeline through which large volumes of water must pass to reach PRS #6. Under a maximum day demand condition, the headloss in this 12 -inch diameter pipeline exceeds 7 feet per 1,000 feet (ft/kft). While not critical to meeting e xisting fire flow requirements, the recommended 830 lf of 20-inch diameter pipeline would reduce the velocity and headloss and improve the Zone 2 backbone transmission system.

Refer to Figures 3C and 3D for detailed schematics of the connections to existing pipelines which would be required to construct Alternative 3 with the optional 830 lf of Zone 2 pipeline. It should be noted that surface features at the intersection of Lammers Road and Redb ridge Road do not match those shown on the record drawings for that area as depicted on Figure 3D. The configuration of the existing pipelines in this area should be confirmed during design.

Zones 1 and 2 would meet fire flow requirements during a maximum day demand condition under Alternative 3, as shown on Figure 4. For the evaluation results shown on Figure 4, it was assumed that the optional 830 lf of Zone 2 pipeline would not be constructed for more conservative results.

In summary, Alternative 3 is both hydraulically feasible and constructible.

ALTERNATIVE 4: NEW ZONE 2 PIPELINE
In Alternative 4, 3,240 lf of 2 4-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline would be constructed in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road, while the existing 24 -inch diameter Z one 2 pipeline in Lammers Road between Valpico Road and Schulte Road would be re-zoned to Zone 3.

The proposed Zone 3 pipeline south of Valpico Road would connect to the existing pipelines at the intersection of Valpico Road and Lammers Road. An existing v alve would be used to isolate the Zone 2 and Zone 3 transmission lines. Alternative 4 is similar to the recommendation presented in the May 2017 TM, and is shown on Figure 5A. Detailed schematics of the connections to existing pipelines which would be requ ired to construct Alternative 4 are shown on Figures 5B and 5C.

Technical Memorandum
September 25, 2019

o\c\404\60-19-47\wp\Lammers\061119_1
As part of Alternative 4, West Yost also evaluated the feasibility of constructing 830 lf of new 20-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline to connect the proposed 24-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline to be constructed for Alternative 4 to the existing 20-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline at the intersection of Lammers Road and Redbridge Road.

In the existing system, the 24-inch and 20-inch diameter transmission mains in Lammers Road are interrupted by 830 lf of 12-inch diameter pipeline through which large volumes of water must pass to reach PRS #6. Under a maximum day demand condition, the headloss in this 12 -inch diameter pipeline exceeds 7 ft/kft. While not critical to meeting existing fire flow requirements, the recommended 830 lf of 20 -inch diameter pipeline would reduce the velocity and headloss and improve the Zone 2 backbone transmission system.

Refer to Figures 5D and 5E for detailed schematics of the connections to existing pipelines which would be required to construct Alternative 4 with the optional 830 lf of Zone 2 pipeline. It should be noted that surface features at the intersection of Lammers Road and Redbridge Road do not match those shown on the record drawings for that ar ea as depicted on Figure 5E. The configuration of the existing pipelines in this area should be confirmed during design.

As shown on Figure 6, Zones 1 and 2 would meet fire flow requirements during a maximum day demand condition under Alternative 4. For th e evaluation results shown on Figure 6, it was assumed that the optional 830 lf of Zone 2 pipeline would not be constructed for more conservative results. In summary, Alternative 4 is both hydraulically feasible and constructible.

COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES AND CONCLUSIONS
Alternatives 1 and 2 do not meet the City’s existing fire flow requirements and are therefore not hydraulically feasible. Therefore, West Yost does not recommend that the City proceed with either of these alternatives.

Alternatives 3 and 4, on the other hand, both meet existing fire flow requirements and are also constructible. Although Alternatives 3 and 4 are similar in many respects, West Yost recommends that the City construct Alternative 4 over Alternative 3 because it would avoid con struction near the existing 8 -inch diameter natural gas transmission main in the west side of Lammers Road.

West Yost also recommends that the proposed 20-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline between Schulte Road and Redbridge Road be constructed to improve Zone 2 transmission capacity.

It should be noted that the hydraulic analysis performed in this evaluation did not include buildout water system demands. In addition, the proposed alternative operations could potentially impact future developments such as Gateway and Westside Industrial, which are located in Zone 2, as they would no longer be able to connect directly to the existing 24 -inch diameter pipeline in Schulte Road. The City’s buildout water system hydraulic model is currently being updated by West Yost as part of the City’s 2018 Water System Master Plan (WSMP). For the 2018 WSMP, West Yost will confirm whether Alternatives 3 and 4 are hydraulically feasible at buildout of the City’s potable water system and also address any potential impacts to future developments. While it is likely that construction of either a new Zone 3 transmission pipeline (as in Alternative 3) or a new Zone 2 transmission pipeline (as in Alternative 4) will continue to be hydraulically feasible Technical Memorandum
September 25, 2019

o\c\404\60-19-47\wp\Lammers\061119_1
at buildout, the buildout analysis may determine that the new transmission pipeline should be of a larger diameter than is recommended in this evaluation.

In conclusion, West Yost currently recommends that the City construct the following infrastructure improvements in Lammers Road:
• 3,240 lf of new 24-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline between Valpico Road and Schulte Road; and
• 830 lf of new 20-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline from Schulte Road to Redbridge Road to improve existing deficiencies in the City’s Zone 2 system. As noted above, the configuration of the existing pipelines in this area should be confirmed during design.

These recommendations should be confirmed using the buildout water system model as part of the 2018 WSMP.

No estimates of infrastructure costs were developed as part of this evaluation. The locations of existing pipelines and valves shown on the figures attached here -in should be confirmed prior to design. If existing pipelines or valves are not as shown on the reviewed plans and record drawings, additional evaluation of the feasibility of the recommended connections may be required.

0 500250
Scale in Feet
Figure 1
Alternative 1
No New Pipeline from
Valpico Road to Schulte Road
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Last Saved: 9/24/2019 3:08:02 PM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\GIS\MXD\Lammers\Fig1_NoConnect_Alt.mxd : nhoman Notes:

1. Details are not to scale.

Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Proposed Zone 3 Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned to
Zone 3
Existing Zone 2 Pipeline
Irrigation Canal
Schulte Rd
2 1
Lammers Rd
Valpico Rd
Redbridge Rd
24" 24"
24"
24"
12"
12"
12"
8"
10"
12"
8"
20"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
12"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8" 6"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
20"
10"
8"
10"
12"
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
12"
8"
24"
24"
Lammers Rd
Schulte Rd
12"
12"
24"
24"
2 Valpico Rd
Lammers Rd20"
24"
24"
1 Schulte Road Detail
Valpico Road Detail
0 1,200600
Scale in Feet
Figure 2
Alternative 1
Available Fire Flow
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Last Saved: 6/12/2019 9:59:30 AM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\GIS\MXD\Lammers\Fig2_NoConnect_FFResults.mxd : nhoman Available Fire Flow
Does Not Meet Requirements
Meets Requirements
Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Pressure Regulating Station
Booster Pump Station
Cordes Tank
Proposed Zone 3 Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned to
Zone 3
Existing Pipeline
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Hood Way
PRS #6
Pressure upstream of PRS #6
is 76 psi during a maximum day
demand condition.

C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d u c t
D e l t a - M e n dot a
Canal
Schulte Rd
Lammers Rd
Valpico Rd
Hansen Rd
16"
12"
24"
12"
24"
24"
8"
24"
24" 12"
20"
12"
20"
8"
8"
16"
12"
12"
8"
8"
12"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
10"
8"
8"
12"
8"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8" 8"12"
8"8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
24"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8" 8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
12"
8"
12"
8"
20"
16"
12"
20"
16"
16"
Notes:

1. Results assume that connections in Hood Way and
Hansen Road are constructed as recommended
in the Design Recommendations for Hood Way Pipeline
annotated figures.

2. The available fire flow shown is the maximum flow
available while maintaining 30 psi residual system
pressure. Fire flow evaluation performed under
maximum day demand conditions.
0 500250
Scale in Feet
Figure 3A
Alternative 3
New Zone 3 Pipeline from
Valpico Road to Schulte Road
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Last Saved: 6/12/2019 10:08:51 AM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\GIS\MXD\Lammers\Fig3A_Zone3_Alt.mxd : nhoman Notes:

1. Details are not to scale.

Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Proposed Zone 3 Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned to
Zone 3
Optional Zone 2 Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Removed if
Optional Zone 2 Pipeline
Constructed
Existing Zone 2 Pipeline
Irrigation Canal
Schulte Rd
1 2
3 Lammers Rd
Valpico Rd
Redbridge Rd
24"
24"
24" 24"
12"
12"
12"
8"
10"
12"
8"
20"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8" 8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8" 6"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
10"
8"
20"
10"
12"
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
12"
8"
24"
24"
24"
24"
12"
20"
Lammers Rd
Schulte Rd
12"
24"
24"
24"
12"
24"
12"
12"
20"
Redbridge Rd
Lammers Rd
12"
20"
12"
20"
2 Valpico Rd
Lammers Rd
24"
24"
20"
1 3
Schulte Road Detail
(See Figures 3B and 3C for Schematics)
Redbridge Road Detail
(See Figure 3D for Schematic)
Valpico Road Detail

PROPOSED
24" CUT-IN-TEE
EXISTING 24" W

TO BE RE-ZONED
TO ZONE 3
PROPOSED 24"
ZONE 3 W
EXISTING 24"
ZONE 2 W
EXISTING 24" BFV

TO BE CLOSED FOR

RE-ZONING
EXISTING 12"
ZONE 2 W

LAMMERS RD

SCHULTE RD

FROM ELLIS

DEVELOPMENT

AND JJWTP
EXISTING 12"

22.5° ELBOW
(ANGLED DOWN)
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 9/20/2019 1:56 PM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Alternative 3
Schematic of Schulte Road and
Lammers Road Connection
Figure 3B

PROPOSED
24" CUT-IN-TEE
EXISTING 24" W

TO BE RE-ZONED
TO ZONE 3
PROPOSED 24"
ZONE 3 W
EXISTING 24"
ZONE 2 W
EXISTING 24" BFV

TO BE CLOSED FOR

RE-ZONING
EXISTING 12"
ZONE 2 W
REPLACE EXISTING 24" X 12" REDUCER,
12" VALVE, AND 12" ELBOW WITH
PROPOSED 24" X 20" REDUCER
AND 20" BFV

PROPOSED
20" X 12" TEE

REMOVE OR ABANDON
EXISTING 12" ZONE 2 W

LAMMERS RD

SCHULTE RD

FROM ELLIS

DEVELOPMENT

AND JJWTP
EXISTING 12"

22.5° ELBOW
(ANGLED DOWN)
PROPOSED 20"
ZONE 2 W
PROPOSED 20"

22.5° ELBOW
(ANGLED DOWN)
PROPOSED 12"
ZONE 2 W
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 9/20/2019 1:56 PM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Alternative 3
Schematic of Schulte Road and
Lammers Road Connection
with Optional Zone 2 Pipeline
Figure 3C

PROPOSED 20"
ZONE 2 W
EXISTING 12"
ZONE 2 W

LAMMERS RD

REDBRIDGE RD
PROPOSED 20" CUT-IN-TEE AND SHUT-OFF VALVE
EXISTING 20"
ZONE 2 W
45'±
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 6/12/2019 9:44 AM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

2. Existing pipelines presented in this schematic are based on available record drawings. Visible surface features near the intersection of Lammers Road and Redbridge Road do not match those shown on the record drawings. Configuration of existing pipelines in this area should be confirmed.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Alternative 3
Schematic of Redbridge Road
and Lammers Road Connection
with Optional Zone 2 Pipeline
Figure 3D

0 1,200600
Scale in Feet
Figure 4
Alternative 3
Available Fire Flow
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Last Saved: 6/17/2019 7:56:04 AM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\GIS\MXD\Lammers\Fig4_Zone3_FFResults.mxd : nhoman Available Fire Flow
Does Not Meet Requirements
Meets Requirements
Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Pressure Regulating Station
Booster Pump Station
Cordes Tank
Proposed Zone 3 Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned to
Zone 3
Existing Pipeline
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Hood Way
PRS #6
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d u c t
D e l t a - M e n dot a
Canal
Schulte Rd
Lammers Rd
Valpico Rd
Hansen Rd
16"
12"
24"
12"
24"
24"
8"
24"
24" 12"
20"
12"
20"
8"
8"
24"
16"
12"
12"
8"
8"
12"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
10"
8"
8"
12"
8"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8" 8"12"
8"8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
24"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8" 8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
12"
8"
12"
8"
20"
16"
12"
20"
16"
16"
24"
Notes:

1. Results assume that connections in Hood Way and
Hansen Road are constructed as recommended
in the Design Recommendations for Hood Way Pipeline
annotated figures.

2. Results assume that optional Zone 2 pipeline will
not be constructed (see Figure 5A).

3. The available fire flow shown is the maximum flow
available while maintaining 30 psi residual system
pressure. Fire flow evaluation performed under
maximum day demand conditions.
0 500250
Scale in Feet
Figure 5A
Alternative 4
New Zone 2 Pipeline from
Valpico Road to Schulte Road
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Last Saved: 9/24/2019 9:14:19 AM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\GIS\MXD\Lammers\Fig5A_Zone3_Alt.mxd : nhoman Notes:

1. Details are not to scale.

Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Proposed Zone 3 Pipeline
Proposed Zone 2 Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned to
Zone 3
Optional Zone 2 Pipeline
Existing Zone 2 Pipeline
Irrigation Canal
Schulte Rd
Lammers Rd
1 2
3 Valpico Rd
Redbridge Rd
24" 24"
24"
24"
12"
12"
12"
8"
10"
12"
8"
20"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8" 8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8" 6"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
20"
10"
8"
10"
12"
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
12"
8"
24"
24"
24"
24"
20"
Lammers Rd
Schulte Rd
12"
24"
24"
12"
12"
24"
12"
20"
12"
20"
12"
Redbridge Rd
Lammers Rd
20"
Valpico Rd
Lammers Rd
24"
20"
24" 24"
Schulte Road Detail
(See Figures 5C and 5D for Schematics)
Redbridge Road Detail
(See Figure 5E for Schematic)
Valpico Road Detail
(See Figure 5B for Schematic)
2 1
3 This length of pipe is not
to be constructed if the
optional Zone 2 pipeline
is constructed.

REMOVE EXISTING

BLIND FLANGE AND
INSTALL 24" X 20"

REDUCER
EXISTING 24" W

TO BE RE-ZONED
TO ZONE 3
PROPOSED 20"
ZONE 3 W
EXISTING 24" ZONE 2 W
PROPOSED 24" CUT-IN-TEE
PROPOSED 24"
ZONE 2 W
EXISTING 24" BFV

TO BE CLOSED FOR

RE-ZONING

VALPICO RD

LAMMERS RD

FROM ELLIS

DEVELOPMENT

AND JJWTP
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 9/20/2019 1:29 PM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Alternative 4
Schematic of Valpico Road and
Lammers Road Connection
Figure 5B

EXISTING 24" W

TO BE RE-ZONED
TO ZONE 3

LAMMERS RD

SCHULTE RD
PROPOSED 24"
ZONE 2 W

REPLACE EXISTING
45° ELBOW WITH
12" CUT-IN-WYE
EXISTING 12" BFV

TO BE CLOSED FOR

RE-ZONING
PROPOSED 24" X 12"
REDUCER EXISTING 12"
ZONE 2 W
EXISTING 12"

22.5° ELBOW
(ANGLED DOWN)
EXISTING 12"
ZONE 2 W

DISCONNECT AND CAP

W/ BLIND FLANGE

AFTER RE-ZONING
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 9/20/2019 1:56 PM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Alternative 4
Schematic of Schulte Road and
Lammers Road Connection
Figure 5C

EXISTING 24" W

TO BE RE-ZONED
TO ZONE 3

LAMMERS RD
SCHULTE RDEXISTING 12"
ZONE 2 W
PROPOSED 24" X 20"

REDUCER
PROPOSED 24"
ZONE 2 W
EXISTING 12" BFV

TO BE CLOSED FOR

RE-ZONING
PROPOSED 20" X 12" TEE
PROPOSED 20"
ZONE 2 W
PROPOSED 12"

CUT-IN-TEE
EXISTING 12"

22.5° ELBOW
(ANGLED DOWN)
INSTALL 12" FCA ON
PROPSED 12" VERTICAL

PIPE (NOT SHOWN)
PROPOSED 24"

22.5° ELBOW
(ANGLED UP)

DISCONNECT AND CAP

W/ BLIND FLANGE

AFTER RE-ZONING
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 9/20/2019 1:56 PM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Alternative 4
Schematic of Schulte Road and
Lammers Road Connection
with Optional Zone 2 Pipeline
Figure 5D

PROPOSED 20"
ZONE 2 W
EXISTING 12"
ZONE 2 W

LAMMERS RD

REDBRIDGE RD
PROPOSED 20" CUT-IN-TEE AND SHUT-OFF VALVE
EXISTING 20"
ZONE 2 W
45'±
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 6/12/2019 9:38 AM nhoman N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Alternative 4
Schematic of Redbridge Road
and Lammers Road Connection
with Optional Zone 2 Pipeline
Figure 5E
Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

2. Existing pipelines presented in this schematic are based on available record drawings. Visible surface features near the intersection of Lammers Road and Redbridge Road do not match those shown on the record drawings. Configuration of existing pipelines in this area should be confirmed.
0 1,200600
Scale in Feet
Figure 6
Alternative 4
Available Fire Flow
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Lammers Road Pipeline
Last Saved: 9/24/2019 9:16:39 AM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\GIS\MXD\Lammers\Fig6_Zone2_FFResults.mxd : nhoman Available Fire Flow
Does Not Meet Requirements
Meets Requirements
Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Pressure Regulating Station
Booster Pump Station
Cordes Tank
Proposed Zone 3 Pipeline
Proposed Zone 2 Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned to
Zone 3
Existing Pipeline
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Hood Way
PRS #6
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d u c t
D e l t a - M e n dot a
Canal
Schulte Rd
Lammers Rd
Valpico Rd
Hansen Rd
24"
16"
12"
24"
12"
24"
8"
24"
24" 12"
20"
12"
20"
16"
12"
12"
8"
8"
12"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8" 8"12"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
24"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8" 8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
10"
12"
8"
12"
8"
20"
16"
12"
20"
16"
16"
24"
Notes:

1. Results assume that connections in Hood Way and
Hansen Road are constructed as recommended
in the Design Recommendations for Hood Way Pipeline
annotated figures.

2. Results assume that optional Zone 2 pipeline will
not be constructed (see Figure 5A).

3. The available fire flow shown is the maximum flow
available while maintaining 30 psi residual system
pressure. Fire flow evaluation performed under
maximum day demand conditions.

ATTACHMENT 1
Key Figures from Hydraulic Evaluation of
IPC Buildings 3, 4, and 12 TM, May 18, 2017

0 2,5001,250
Scale in Feet
Figure 5A
Proposed Alternative
Operations
City of Tracy
Hydraulic Evaluation of
IPC Buildings 3, 4, and 12
Last Saved: 8/8/2017 3:26:36 PM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\12-16-28 Cordes IPC Buildings\GIS\MXD\Fig5A_Alternatives.mxd : akwong Symbology
Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Previously Proposed Check Valve
Pressure Regulating Station #9
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Cordes Booster Pump Station
Existing Patterson Pass Booster Pump Station
Previously Proposed Interim Booster Pump and
Pressure Regulating Station
Cordes Tank
John Jones Water Treatment Plant
Pipeline Required for Alternative Operations
(Ellis)
Proposed Pipeline Required for Alternative
Operations (IPC)
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned
Existing Pipeline
Ellis Pipeline
Cordes Phases 1 and 2 Pipeline
Smuckers Pipeline
Proposed Project
City Limit
Hood Way
Hopkins Rd
Promontory Pkwy
Bud Lyons Way
14,745 ft
3,025 ft
2,100 ft
Schulte Rd
Lammers Rd
Valpico Rd
Hansen Rd
M
ountain
House
Pkwy
16''
20''
20''
#3 and #4
#12
205
580
24''
PRS #5
PRS #4
PRS #6
Hood Way
345 ft 16''
Hansen Rd
16''
12''
24''
16''
16''
24''
14''
16''
24''
10''
10''
16''
16''
16''
FedEx
Note: Refer to Figure 5B for detailed
locations of closed valves due to
re-zoning.

Cordes Tank and BPS Detail
20"
24"
Figure 5B
Proposed Alternative
Operations: Details for
Closed Valves
City of Tracy
Hydraulic Evaluation of
IPC Buildings 3, 4, and 12
Last Saved: 8/8/2017 3:26:18 PM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\12-16-28 Cordes IPC Buildings\GIS\MXD\Fig5B_Alternative_Detail.mxd : akwong Symbology
Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Pressure Regulating Station #9
Cordes Booster Pump Station
Existing Patterson Pass Booster Pump
Station
Cordes T ank
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned
Proposed Zone 3 Pipeline Required for
Alternative Operations (IPC)
Proposed Zone 2 Pipeline Required for
Alternative Operations (IPC)
Existing Pipeline
Zone 2
Zone 3
Cordes Phases 1 and 2 Pipeline
Zone 2
Zone 3
Lammers Rd
Schulte Rd
20''
12''
24''
12''
24"
16''
Hansen Rd
16''
12''
24''16''
16''
24''
14''
16''
24''
10'' 10''
16''
16''
16''
12''
24''
12''
24''
16''
Schulte Rd
Hansen Rd
20''
24''
Lammers Rd
Valpico Rd
24''
Valpico Road and Lammers Road Detail Lammers Road and Old Schulte Road Detail Hansen Road Detail Cordes Tank and BPS Detail
Hopkins Rd
0 450225
Scale in Feet
0 10050
Scale in Feet
0 10050
Scale in Feet
0 10050
Scale in Feet
Bud Lyons Way
Hood Way
0 600300
Scale in Feet
Figure 8
Recommended
Improvements for
Proposed Alternative
Operations
City of Tracy
Hydraulic Evaluation of
IPC Buildings 3, 4, and 12
Last Saved: 8/8/2017 3:33:43 PM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\12-16-28 Cordes IPC Buildings\GIS\MXD\Fig8_Improvements.mxd : akwong Symbology
Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Recommended Pipeline
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned
Proposed Pipeline Required for
Alternative Operatons (IPC)
Existing Pipeline
City Limit
3,440 ft
Schulte Rd
Schulte Rd
Valpico Rd
Lammers Rd
20''
12''
20''
24''
IPC Development
Ellis Specific Plan
50 ft
12''
20''
Lammers RdSchulte Rd
24''

ATTACHMENT 2
Planning and Modeling Criteria
(2012 Citywide Water System Master Plan)

1 City of Tracy
o\c\404-60-19-47\wp\Att September 2019
ATTACHMENT 2
Planning and Modeling Criteria
Planning and modeling criteria used to evaluate the various alternatives are based on the system performance and operational criteria developed in the 2012 Citywide Water System Master Plan.

The criteria used to evaluate the existing water system and the proposed pipelines for the various alternatives are listed as follows:
• Residual pressure at the flowing hydrant (during an assumed maximum day demand plus fire flow condition) and throughout the water system must be equal to or greater than 30 pounds per square inch (psi) during the simulated fire condition. • Minimum allowable service pressure is 40 psi during all other non-fire demand conditions.
• Maximum allowable service pressure is 80 psi. A pressure reducing valve (PRV) will be required on all water services with a static pressure greater than 80 psi and should conform with the requirements from the Uniform Plumbing Code. • Maximum allowable distribution pipeline velocity is 12 feet per second (fps) during the simulated fire flow demand condition.
• Maximum allowable transmission and distribution pipeline velocity is 6 fps and 8 fps, respectively, during a non-fire demand condition.
• Maximum allowable head loss rate is 10 feet per 1,000 feet (ft/kft) during the simulated fire demand condition.
• Maximum head losses in distribution system pipelines should be limited to 7 ft/kft during a non-fire demand condition.
• New and required pipelines will be modeled with a roughness coefficient (C-factor) of 130.
• Available fire flow demand must meet a minimum flow of 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm), 2,500 gpm, 3,500 gpm, or 4,500 gpm depending on land use during a maximum day demand condition. These required fire flow demands assume that buildings are sprinklered.
• The 2012 Master Plan hydraulic model of the City’s water distribution system was used as the basis for evaluation.1 However, the hydraulic model was updated to include the following major existing system improvements:
— Improvements that have been recently constructed on South Lammers Road (20-inch diameter pipeline and pressure regulating station (PRS #6)); and — Proposed improvements on South MacArthur Drive (24-inch diameter pipeline).

1 This hydraulic model was updated to include projected water demands from new developments such as Valpico and MacDonald Apartments, Sierra Hills (Aspire I) Apartments, Tiburon Village, Middlefield Drive Apartments and Self-Storage Facility, I-205 Parcels M1 and M2 and Infill Parcels 7 and 13, Grant Line Road Apartments, South Lammers Road Development, Aspire II Development, Pescadero IPT Development, first three buildings at Cordes Ranch, Ellis Specific Plan Phase 1A and Phase 1A Extension, Marriott TownePlace Suites, Larch Clover Interim Annexation, Ellis Specific Plan Phase 2 - The Gardens, IPC Buildings 3, 4, and 12, IPC Building 25, IPC Buildings 22, 23, and Thermo Fisher, Tracy Village Specific Plan, Avenues Specific Plan, IPC Buildings 9, 10, and 14, NEI Specific Plan, and Tracy Hills Phases 1A, 1B, and 1C. City staff also requested West Yost to incorporate the following developments, which were evaluated by Black Water Consulting Engineers, Inc. into the City’s hydraulic model: Barcelona Infill, Berg Road Properties, Harvest Apartments, 321 E. Grant Line Apartments, Project Hawk/IPC, and Home 2 Suites. 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 150 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Phone 925.426.2580 Fax 530.756.5991 westyost.com

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 11, 2019 Project No.: 404-60-19-47
SENT VIA: EMAIL

TO: Zabih Zaca, City of Tracy

CC: Robert Armijo, City of Tracy
Paul Verma, City of Tracy
Al Gali, City of Tracy
Nanda Gottiparthy, SNG & Associates, Inc.

FROM: Nathaniel Homan, PE, RCE #89903
Jim Connell, PE, RCE #63052

REVIEWED BY: Amy Kwong, PE, RCE #73213

SUBJECT: Design Recommendations for Hood Way Pipeline

In a technical memorandum (TM) prepared for the City of Tracy (City) titled Hydraulic Evaluation of International Park of Commerce (IPC) Buildings 3, 4, and 12, dated May 18, 2017, West Yost Associates (West Yost) recommended that 345 lineal feet (lf) of 16 -inch diameter City -side Pressure Zone 2 (Zone 2) transmission main be constructed in Hood Way. The purpose of this recommended pipeline improvement was to provide pipeline network looping for Zone 2 pipelines located in Hood Way and Hansen Road after portions of the existing Zone 2 tr ansmission main system are re-zoned to City-side Pressure Zone 3 (Zone 3).

This TM summarizes the findings and conclusions of West Yost’s technical evaluation of the feasibility of constructing two shorter 16-inch diameter connections in Hood Way and Hans en Road, in place of the previously recommended pipeline. The locations of the proposed connections are shown on Figure 1.

The proposed connection in Hood Way would consist of approximately 36 lf of 16-inch diameter pipeline connecting the existing 16-inch diameter Zone 2 Cordes Tank fill line with the existing 24-inch diameter Zone 3 Cordes Pump Station discharge line. A detailed schematic of this connection is shown on Figure 2. An existing 16-inch butterfly valve would be permanently closed to re-zone the Cordes Tank fill line to Zone 3.

The proposed connection in Hansen Road would consist of approximately 20 lf of 16 -inch diameter pipeline connecting the existing 16 -inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline and the existing 24-inch diameter Zone 3 pi peline in Hansen Road. A detailed schematic of this connection is shown on Figure 3. This connection would be placed approximately 135 ft south of the intersection of Hopkins Road and Hansen Road to take advantage of the existing butterfly valve on the 24-inch diameter pipeline. This existing butterfly valve would be used to isolate the 24 -inch diameter Technical Memorandum
November 11, 2019

o\c\404\60-19-47\wp\HoodWay\061219
pipeline between Schulte Road and Hopkins Road so that the pipeline in Hopkins Road west of Hansen Road could continue to serve Zone 3 during construction. The existing butterfly valve would be re -opened after construction is completed . The proposed new butterfly valve , to be installed north of the proposed cut-in-tee on the 16-inch diameter pipeline, would be permanently closed to re-zone the 16-inch diameter pipeline south of the proposed connection to Zone 3.

These proposed connections have two advantages over the previously recommended pipeline:

1. The total length of new pipeline required is 289 ft shorter than the previously recommended pipeline, making this alternative less expensive.

2. The proposed connections preserve the existing Zone 2 pipeline loop in Hansen Road, Hood Way, and Hopkins Road, unlike the alternative recommended in the May 2017 TM, which would break this loop by re-zoning the existing 16-inch diameter Zone 2 pipeline in Hansen Road between Hood Way and Hopkins Way to Zone 3.

After reviewing available plans and record drawings of the proposed construction areas, West Yost determined that the proposed connections are constructible. West Yost recommends the City construct the proposed connections instead of constructing the pipeline recommended in the May 2017 TM.

It should be noted that the re-zoning will close the valve at the southern end of the 12-inch diameter pipeline in Bud Lyons Way. This will create a long stretch of dead-end pipe and could potentially lead to water quality issues. Solutions to address these issues include:

1. Placing the water service lateral for the future building located east of Bud-Lyons Way as close as possible to the southern end of Bud Lyons Way. The demands from the building would keep water flowing through the pipeline and prevent stagnant water from forming.

2. Abandoning the pipeline in Bud Lyons Way. This option is only feasible if this pipeline is not needed for future water service connections.

3. Implementing a program to regularly flush the pipeline using a hydrant or blow off valve near the southern end of Bud Lyons Way.

This TM is submitted in accordance with West Yost’s January 2019 Scope of Services. No estimates of infrastructure costs were developed as part of this evaluation. The locations of existing pipelines and valves shown on the figures attached here-in should be confirmed prior to design. If existing pipelines or valves are not as shown on the reviewed plans and record drawings, additional evaluation of the feasibility of the recommended connections may be required.

0 250125
Scale in Feet
Figure 1
Recommended Connections
for Re-Zoning at Hood Way
and Hansen Road
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Hood Way Pipeline
Last Saved: 6/13/2019 8:28:16 AM O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\GIS\MXD\Hood Way\Fig1_Alternatives.mxd : nhoman Notes:

1. Details are not to scale.

Closed Valve Due to Re-zoning
Existing
Proposed
Other Existing Valve
Cordes PRS #9
Cordes Pump Station
Cordes Tank
Proposed Connection
Existing Pipeline to be Re-zoned to
Zone 3
Existing Pipeline
Zone 2
Zone 3
Hood Way
Hopkins Rd
Hansen Rd
Schulte Rd
Bud-Lyons Way
1 2
16"
24"
16"
24"
12"
16"
24"
16" 12"
16"
12"
16"
16"
24"
16"
24"
Hood Way
16"
16"
16"
16"
24"
24"
24"
16"16"
24"
16"16"
Hood Way Detail
(See Figure 2 for Schematic)
Hopkins Rd
Hansen Rd
24"
12"
16"
16"
24" 16"
16"
Hansen Road Detail
(See Figure 3 for Schematic)
1 2

HOOD WAY
EXISTING 16" W
ZONE 2
EXISTING 16" W
ZONE 2
EXISTING 24" W
ZONE 3
PROPOSED 16" CUT-IN-TEE
PROPOSED 24" X 16" CUT-IN-TEE
PROPOSED 16" CONNECTION
EXISTING 16" BFV

TO BE CLOSED

FOR RE-ZONING
EXISTING 16" W

TO BE RE-ZONED
TO ZONE 3
EXISTING 24" W
ZONE 3

TO CORDES
TANK

FILL VALVE
FROM
CORDES
PUMP

STATION
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 6/4/2019 2:47 PM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Hood Way Pipeline
Schematic
Hood Way Connection
Figure 2

EXISTING 16" W

TO BE RE-ZONED
TO ZONE 3
PROPOSED 16" CUT-IN-TEE AND

SHUT-OFF VALVES
EXISTING 24" W
ZONE 3
PROPOSED 24" X 16" CUT-IN-TEE

AND SHUT-OFF VALVE

HANSEN RD
PROPOSED 16" CONNECTION
PROPOSED 16" BFV TO BE

CLOSED FOR RE-ZONING
EXISTING 16" W
ZONE 2
SLOPE
DOWN

HOPKINS RD
135'±
O:\Clients\404 City of Tracy\60-19-47 Lammers Eval\CAD\Figures\Linne_Hood_Connections.dwg 6/4/2019 3:11 PM nhoman Notes:

1. Schematic connection points are for illustrative purposes only for the conceptual understanding of the likely components involved in installing the recommended connections. These schematics are not to be used for construction purposes.

N
City of Tracy
Design Recommendations for
Hood Way Pipeline
Schematic
Hansen Road Connection
Figure 3

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-1 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-23-20 Master Plan Update

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions
This appendix details West Yost’s assumptions for estimating probable construction costs for the recommended potable and recycled water system facilities. Construction costs were developed based on a combination of data supplied by manufacturers, published industry standard cost data and curves, construction costs for similar facilities built by the City and/or other public agencies, and construction costs p reviously estimated by West Yost for similar facilities with similar construction cost indexes.

The costs presented in this appendix are for construction only and do not include estimating or construction uncertainties (e.g., variations in final quantitie s) or cost estimates for engineering, legal services, environmental review, inspections , and/or contract administration. Some of these items are referred to as contingency costs or mark-ups and are addressed in the last section of this appendix. It should also be noted that the construction costs presented in this appendix represent capital infrastructure costs and do not include costs for purchase of additional surface water supplies, supply reliability, or operation and maintenance.

All estimated construction costs have been adjusted to reflect 2020 dollars and should be used for conceptual cost estimates only and be updated regularly. Construction costs presented in this appendix are not intended to represent the lowest prices in the industry for each typ e of construction; rather they are representative of average or typical construction costs. These planning-level construction cost estimates have been prepared for guidance in evaluating various facility improvement options and are intended only for budgetary purposes within the context of this master planning effort.

The following sections of this appendix describe the assumptions used to estimate the probable construction costs for the planning and design of recommended water system facilities for the City’s potable and recycled water systems:
• Land Acquisition Costs
• Potable Water System Construction Costs
• Recycled Water System Construction Costs
• Contingency Costs or Mark-ups

LAND ACQUISITION COSTS
It is assumed that land for buildout potable and recycled water facilities will be acquired at $190,000 per acre. Costs for land acquisition will only be added to major facilities such as tank sites where a large parcel is required. Consequently, land acquisition costs do not include right-of-way acquisition costs for transmission and distribution mains.

POTABLE WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS
The following sections present the construction cost estimates used to project probable construction costs for recommended water system facilities in the City’s potable water system and are categorized by improvement project type.

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-2 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
E.2.1 Treated Water Storage Reservoirs
Table 1 summarizes the estimated construction costs for treated water storage reservoirs between the size range of 0.5 to 6.0 MG. These costs generally include the installation of the storage tank, site piping, earthwork, pavi ng, instrumentation, and related sitework. These costs are representative of construction conducted under normal excavation and foundation conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult foundation requirements.

It is recommended that new potable water storage reservoirs be partially buried prestressed concrete tanks to minimize impacts to developable land. These reservoirs could be located beneath City parks, allowing other uses of the land above the proposed reservoirs.

Table 1. Construction Costs for Treated Water Storage Reservoirs (a) Capacity, MG
Estimated Construction Cost, million dollars(b)
Partially Buried Prestressed Concrete

0.5 2.5

1.0 3.0

2.0 4.0

3.0 4.9

4.0 5.9

5.0 6.9

6.0 7.8
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

E.2.2 Aquifer Storage and Recovery Production Wells
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well construction consists of pilot hole drilling, water quality/soil sampling, pilot hole reaming, well construction, well development and providing the necessary housing, pump, motor, automatic control equipment (SCADA) , discharge piping, and disinfection equipment. All new groundwater wells will be designed to allow for both injection and extraction of water supplies in conjunction with the City’s proposed ASR Well Program.

Construction costs for new groundwater wells are estimated to be approximately $3,900,000 per well (assuming a well capacity of 2,500 gpm). For wells with a capacity of 1,000 gpm, estimated construction costs are approximately $2,500,000 per well. These estimates are based on recent bids for similarl y sized wells and representative of construction conducted under normal drilling conditions. Costs would be significantly higher for special or difficult locations.

E.2.3 Treated Water Booster Pump Stations
Booster pump stations will be required at ground-level and below-grade reservoirs to lift water to the appropriate pressure zones. Estimated average construction costs for distribution pumping stations, as shown in Table 2, are based on enclosed stations with architectural and landscaping treatment suitable f or residential areas. Booster pump station costs can vary considerably, depending on architectural design, pumping head, and pumping capacity. Therefore, these costs

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-3 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
presented below are representative of construction conducted under common or normal conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult conditions.

Booster pump station cost estimates include the installation of the booster pumps, site piping, earthwork, paving, a chemical feed system (hypochlorite), on -site backup/standby power generator, SCADA, and rela ted sitework. Station designs will be based on the City’s typical booster pump station configurations, which include 2 to 4 variable speed booster pumps installed in parallel to accommodate varying water demand conditions.

Table 2. Construction Costs for Treated Water Booster Pump Stations(a) Firm Capacity(b), mgd Estimated Construction Cost, million dollars(c)

0.5 1.3
1 1.4
2 1.5
3 1.7
5 2.0
10 2.8
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Equal to the total pumping capacity with the largest pump out of service or on standby. (c) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

E.2.4 Pipelines
Unit construction costs for potable water pipelines 8 through 36 inches in diameter are provided in Table 3. These unit costs are categorized by typical pipeline construction either in developed (e.g., in urban or suburban roads) or undeveloped (e.g., across open fields or in rural roads) areas and are representative of pipeline construct ion conducted under common or normal conditions .

Special or difficult conditions would increase costs significantly.

The unit construction costs presented below generally include pipeline materials, trenching, placing and jointing pipe, valves, fittings, h ydrants, service connections, placing imported pipe bedding, native backfill material, and partial asphalt pavement replacement, if required. However, the costs presented in Table 3 do not include jacking and boring pipe or constructing boring and receiving pits . It is assumed the total cost to construct one boring pit and one receiving pit is $40,000. Pipeline jack and bore costs are shown in Table 4 and should be added where required.

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-4 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
Table 3. Unit Construction Costs for Pipelines(a,b)
Pipeline Diameter, inches
Unit Construction Cost, dollars/linear foot(c)
Developed Areas Undeveloped Areas
8 190 160
10 220 185
12 260 225
14 300 255
16 335 285
18 370 315
20 400 340
24 465 395
30 565 480
36 660 560
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Costs based on ductile iron cement-lined pipe.
(c) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

Table 4. Unit Construction Costs for Jack and Bore(a)
Pipeline Size Unit Construction Cost, dollars/linear foot(b,c) 8-inch pipe (16-inch casing) 520
12-inch pipe (21-inch casing) 595
16-inch pipe (24-inch casing) 690
20-inch pipe (30-inch casing) 845
24-inch pipe (36-inch casing) 995
30-inch pipe (42-inch casing) 1,115
54-inch pipe (66-inch casing) 1,700
Tunnel 3,540
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Conductor pipe is not included in cost.
(c) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

E.2.5 Pressure Regulating Stations and Pressure Reducing Valves Interconnections (i.e., pressure regulating station or pressure reducing valve ) are required to provide water supply between pressure zones during peak demands and/or emergency conditions.

The estimated construction cost for a pressure regulating station is $ 250,000, while construction of a pressure reducing valve is estimated at $125,000. These costs are representative of construction conducted under normal conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult conditions.

Construction cost estimates for a pressure regulating station include the installation of a 12-inch diameter control valve , a concrete utility vault, access hatches, site piping, earthwork, paving,

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-5 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
SCADA, and related sitework. Construction cost estimates for a pressure reducing valve include the same items as a pressure regulating station; however, since a pressure reducing valve is typically used for emergency conditions, it requires a less complicated control valve and does not include SCADA installation.

E.2.6 Backup Power Generators
On-site backup power generators are recommended so pumps can continue delivering water to the distribution system in the event of a power outage. These generators should be sized to meet the power demands of the pumps. The construction cost for a new on -site backup power generator is estimated to be approximately $250,000. This cost is representative of construction conducted under normal conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult conditions.

E.2.7 SCADA System Improvements
SCADA system improvements are recommended to provide operators with real-time system data and flexibility in system operations. The construction cost for the installation of S CADA monitoring is estimated to be $125,000. This cost is representative of construction conducted under normal conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult conditions. Any discrepancies or inaccurate data tags should also be corrected to provide accurate real-time system flow and pressure monitoring.

RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS
The following sections present the construction cost estimates used to project probable construction costs for recommended recycled water syst em facilities and are categorized by improvement project type.

The construction cost estimates of the recycled water system are based on similar assumptions to the construction cost estimates of the potable water system.

E.3.1 Recycled Water Storage Reservoirs
For partially buried prestressed concrete tanks, e stimated storage reservoir costs are the same for recycled water and potable water and are repeated in Table 5 for reference. Table 5 also includes estimated costs for above ground, welded steel storage res ervoirs. Costs for b oth concrete and welded steel tank s generally include the installation of the storage tank, site piping, earthwork, paving, instrumentation, and related sitework. Estimates are representative of construction conducted under normal excavation and foundation conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult foundation requirements. It is assumed that the recommended Zone A Tank (refer to Chapter 9) will be an above ground welded steel storage reservoir, while the remain ing recommended storage reservoir(s) for the recycled water system will be partially buried prestressed concrete tanks.

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-6 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
Table 5. Construction Costs for Recycled Water Storage Reservoirs (a) Capacity, MG
Estimated Construction Cost, million dollars(b)
Partially Buried Prestressed Concrete Welded Steel

0.5 2.5 1.7

1.0 3.0 2.1

2.0 4.0 2.9

3.0 4.9 3.7

4.0 5.9 4.5

5.0 6.9 5.3

6.0 7.8 6.0
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

E.3.2 Recycled Water Booster Pump Stations
Additional recycled water booster pump stations will be required at the Holly Drive WWTP and other locations to lift recycled water to the appropriate pressure zones. Estimated average construction costs for distribution pumping stations, as shown in Table 6, are based on enclosed stations with architectural and landscaping treatment suitable for residential areas. Booster pump station costs can vary considerably, depending on factors such as architectural design, pumping head, and pumping capacity. Therefore, these costs presented b elow are representative of construction conducted under common or normal conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult conditions.

Costs presented in Table 6 are discounted 10 percent from the potable water booster pump station costs presented in Table 2. This is because: (1) recycled water booster pump stations do not need to deliver design flows using firm capacity, so one fewer pump is required ; and (2) they do not require backup generators.

Recycled water booster pump station cost estimates include the installation of the booster pumps, site piping, earthwork, paving, SCADA, and related sitework. Station designs will be based on the City’s typical booster pump station configurations, which include 2 to 4 var iable speed booster pumps installed in parallel to accommodate varying water demand conditions.

Table 6. Construction Costs for Recycled Water Booster Pump Stations (a) Total Capacity, mgd Estimated Construction Cost, million dollars(b)

0.5 1.2
1 1.2
2 1.4
3 1.5
5 1.8
10 2.6
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-7 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
E.3.3 Recycled Water Pipelines
Unit construction costs for recycled water pipelines 8 inches and 12 inches in diameter are slightly less than for potable water pipelines , because the 8 -inch and 12 -inch diameter recycled water pipeline material is assumed to be PVC instead of ductile iron. For recycled water pipelines 16 inches t hrough 36 inches in diameter, the material is assumed to be ductile iron , so the unit construction costs for these larger diameter recycled water pipelines are the same as for the corresponding potable water pipelines. Estimated pipeline unit costs are provided in Table 7 and are categorized by typical pipeline construction either in developed (e.g., in urban or suburban roads) or undeveloped (e.g., across open fields or in rural roads ) areas. These costs are representative of pipeline construction conducted under common or normal conditions and would be significantly higher for special or difficult conditions.

The unit construction costs presented below generally include pipeline materials, trenching, placing and jointing pipe, valves, fittings, hydrants, s ervice connections, placing imported pipe bedding, native backfill material, and partial asphalt pavement replacement, if required. However, the costs presented in Table 7 do not include jacking and boring pipe or constructing boring and receiving pits. It is assumed the total cost to construct one boring pit and one receiving pit is $40,000. Pipeline jack and bore costs are shown in Table 8 and should be added where required.

Table 7. Unit Construction Costs for Recycled Water Pipelines(a,b) Pipeline Diameter, inches
Unit Construction Cost, dollars/linear foot(c)
Developed Areas Undeveloped Areas
8 175 150
12 255 220
16 335 285
24 465 395
36 660 560
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Costs based on PVC pipe for 8-inch and 12-inch diameter and ductile iron cement-lined pipe for 16-inch diameter and larger. (c) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-8 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
Table 8. Unit Construction Costs for Jack and Bore(a)
Pipeline Size Unit Construction Cost, dollars/linear foot(b,c) 8-inch pipe (16-inch casing) 520
12-inch pipe (21-inch casing) 595
16-inch pipe (24-inch casing) 690
20-inch pipe (30-inch casing) 845
24-inch pipe (36-inch casing) 995
30-inch pipe (42-inch casing) 1,115
54-inch pipe (66-inch casing) 1,700
Tunnel 3,540
(a) Based on 2020 dollars.
(b) Conductor pipe is not included in cost.
(c) Estimated construction costs do not reflect an adjustment to account for the current economic bidding climate.

CONTINGENCY COSTS OR MARK-UPS
Contingency costs or mark-ups must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, because they will vary considerably with each construction project. However, to assist City staff with budgeting for these recommended water system facility improvements, standard mark -ups have been added to the planning budget as percentages of the estimated base construction cost.

Standard mark-ups are divided into four subcategories, totaling 40 percent:
• General Contingency: The construction costs presented above are representative of the construction of water system facilities under normal construction conditions and schedules; consequently, it is appropriate to allow for estimating and construction uncertainties unavoidably associated with conceptual project planning. Unexpected construction conditions, the need for unforeseen mechanical items, and variations in final quantities are only a few of the items that can increase project costs. An allowance of 15 percent of the base construction cost will be included to cover such project-related general contingencies.
• Design and Planning: Design and planning services associated with new facilities include preliminary investigations and reports, right-of-way acquisition, foundation explorations, preparation of drawings and specifications for construction, surveying and staking, sampling of testing material, and start-up services. The cost of these items may vary, but for the purpose of this study, it is assumed that engineering design and planning costs will equal 10 percent of the base construction cost. • Construction Management: Construction management covers items such as contract management and inspection during construction. The cost of these items may vary, but for the purpose of this study, it is assumed that construction management costs will equal 10 percent of the base construction cost.

APPENDIX E
Cost Estimating Assumptions

E-9 City of Tracy
o\c\404\12-18-41\wp\R – 404 – Water MP\R – 404 App E Citywide Water System Last Revised: 06-22-20 Master Plan Update
• Program Administration: Program administration covers items such as legal fees, environmental/CEQA compliance requirements, financing expenses, and interest during construction. The cost of these items may vary, but for the purpose of this study, it is assumed that program administration costs will equal 5 percent of the base construction cost.

An example application of these standard mark-ups to a project with an assumed base construction cost of $1.0 million is shown in Table 9. As shown, the total cost of all projec t construction contingencies (general contingency, design and planning, construction management, and program administration costs) is 40 percent of the base construction cost for each construction project.

Table 9. Example Application of Mark-ups
Cost Component Percent Cost, dollars
Estimated Base Construction Cost before Mark-ups(a) 1,000,000 Mark-ups:

General Contingency 15 150,000
Design and Planning 10 100,000
Construction Management 10 100,000
Program Administration 5 50,000
Estimated Total Project Cost $1,400,000
(a) Assumed cost of an example project.

APPENDIX F
Proposed Future Potable Water System Facility Improvements

580
580
205
205
580
5 33
O l d Ri ver
C al i f o r n i a
A qu e d uc t
D e l t a - M e n d o t a C ana l

SCHULTE CT

ELEVENTH ST

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

BIRD RD
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

TRACY BL

BYRON RD

AHERN RD

GRANT LINE RD

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK

BANTA RD

KASSON RD

HANSEN RD

VALPICO RD

LOVELY RD

LAMMERS RD

NAGLEE RD

CHRISMAN RD

LINNE RD

HOLLY DR

BETHANY RD

MIDDLE RD

KOSTER RD

VON SOSTEN RD

REEVE RD

DURHAM FERRY RD

SCHULTE RD
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C2 C3 C4
B1 B2 B3 B4
A1 A2
0 6,0003,000
Scale in Feet
Figure F-1
Proposed Future
Potable Water System
Facility Improvements
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 2:43:19 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\Fig_F-1_Overview.mxd : nhoman Notes:

1. The City's hydraulic model is not an all pipes
model. Some pipes which are not hydraulically
significant were excluded from the model.

2. Jack and bore pipeline projects are not shown,
but jack and bore is required for canal, railroad,
or major highway crossings.

Symbology
Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
John Jones Water Treatment Plant
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP

TRACY BL

SUGAR RD

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

LARCH RD

SLOAN CT

RHONDA WY

LAMMERS RD

PHILIP MARTIN CTNANCY
EM
ILIA
CT

ENTERPRISE PL

AUTO PLAZA DR

MIDDLE RD

NAGLEE RD

COMMERCIAL DR
205 ONRAMP 205 OFFRAMP

WHITEHALL RD

BETHANY RD
12"
12"
12"
12"
10"
8"
12"8"12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12"
I-205
Corridor
Larch-Clover
I-205
Expansion
Holly
Sugar
Industrial
12"
12"
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-A1
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C2 C3 C4
B1 B2 B3 B4
A2
205

HOLLY DR

LARCH RD

SUGAR RD
SPUR
LINE
RR

PARADISE
AV

CANAL BL

CALIFORNIA AV
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

BENGAL LN

LUCERNE AV
TOM
PAINE
AV

ARBOR AV
205 OFFRAMP
205 ONRAMP

WHITEHALL RD

LAUREL AV
12" 12"
12"
12"12"
12"
12"
12" 12" 12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
Industrial
Areas
I-205
Corridor
Northeast
Industrial
Area
East Side
Industrial
Holly
Sugar
Industrial
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-A2
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C2 C3 C4
B1 B2 B3 B4
A1
580
205
C a l i f o r n i a A qu e d uct D
el t a - M e n d o t a C a nal

CENTRAL PK

CORTONA CT

SHIELDS
AV

VON SOSTEN RD

LIVERNO AV

TRADITIO
N
ST

BELLA SERATA AV

TERRA MIA AV PROSPERITY ST

PHELPS DR
OLSON
AV
O

LIVEIRA
CT

RAMSEY DR

GRANT LINE RD

HOLT AV

COLLEGEDR

CAMPUS WY

MATTINA ST

LOS RANCHOS DR
TERRA
VERDE
ST

VON SOSTEN CT
ALLEY
LO
S
PAD
RE
S
DR

MOUNTAIN HOUSE PK
205 ONRAMP
205 OFFRAMP
205
ONRAMP
12"
12"
12"
16"
12"
12"12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
Cordes
Ranch
12"
12"
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-B1
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C2 C3 C4
B2 B3 B4
A1 A2
205

BYRON RD

HANSEN RD

ANTHONY DR

ANTONIO
LP
UP RR
G
LAZZY
LN
205 ONRAMP

FABIAN RD

TSIRELAS
DR

THELMA LP

LA PAZ DR

REDONDO DR
G
W
ERDER
ST
SOUZA
W
Y

GLORIA LN

MICHAEL DR

VAQUERO CT

NICHOLAS CT

ZACHARY CT

CYNTHIA CT

CURRIER DR

MILTONJENSONCT

JOAQUINCT
UNIO
N
LN

CATHLEEN LN

HALEY CT

RANCHO RAMON DR

RANCHO VERDE CT

DIABLO CT

YOLO WY
LAMM
ERS
RD

W ESTGATE DR
GENTRY
CT

MADRIDCT

JERROLD ZANZI LN

TARGOWSKI LN
SANTOS
CT

WAKEFIELD CT

LOS POSITAS W Y

GRUNAUER RD

RANCHO RAMON CT

GRANT LINE RD

JAGUAR RN

RANCHOVIEJOCT

VON SOSTEN RD

SAN JOSE RD

ELEVENTH ST
205 OFFRAMP
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
20"
12"
8"
8"
16"
12"
16"
12"
12"
12"
16"
10"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12" 12"
16"
16"
16"
16"
16" 16"
16" 16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
20" 20" 20"
20"
20"
12"
12"
20"16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
Cordes
Ranch Westside
Dobler /
Maibes
I-205
Corridor
I-205
Expansion
Berg /
Byron
Remainder
UR 5
(Bright)
UR4
(Bright
Triangle)
UR 3
(Sandhu)
12"
16"
16"
16"
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-B2
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C2 C3 C4
B1 B3 B4
A1 A2
205

TENTH ST

ELEVENTH ST
ALDE

NGLENDR
CRO
SSRO
ADS
DR

SUMMER GATE
DR

WEST ST

TRACY BL

JEFFERSON
LN

ORCHARD

ORMONDE ST
C ST
ORANGE

WESTBURY CT

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

CLOVER RD

SEQUOIA BL
B ST

HICKORY
AV

FAIRFIELD DR

BANFF AV
G
OLDEN

SPRINGS
DR

GRUNAUER AL

BARCELONADR

MARY ALICE WY

COURT DR

NINTH ST

TWELFTH ST

LAVELLE SMITH DR

SIXTH ST

LINCOLN BL
A ST

CUNEO CT

FOXWOOD DR

JACKSON AV

REDINGTON DR
JO
SEPH
M
ENUSA
LN
BUTHM
ANN
AV

REHN RD

WYMAN CT

PLAZA CT

ALCOTT PL
SUNSET
W
Y
AUTUM
N
M
EADO
W
LN

CARLTON WY

RICHARD DR

MONTGOMERY LN

MEGAN CT

FABIAN RD

CHESTNUT
AV

EVELYNCT

GABRIEL DR

ANNIE CT

BEHAVEN
CT

FERNGROVE LN

KAVANAGH AV

LANKERSHIRE
DR

AUTO PLAZA DR

PINE CT

GRANT LINE RD

SEVENTH ST

MAPLE CT

DORSET LN

CYPRESS DR
PEBBLE

CREEK CT

WALNUT AV

ALTOGA AV

ROCHESTER
ST

QUAIL CTSUM
M
ER
LN
ARRIG
OTTILN

TAYLOR WY

MAPLEGROVE LN
W

ESTCLIFF
LN

PEACOCK
CT

ATLANTA CT
PROM
ANADE
CI

JENNIFER
W
Y

SILVERTAIL PL

OXFORD LN

REGENCY
ST

JOSEPHDAMONDR
HAM

PSHIRELN
O
HARA
DR

LYNCH DR

TREEHAVENLN

CORBETT LN

HURLEY CT

MARIAN CT

SUDBURY CT

HAWTHORNE DR

OLD RIVER CT

PRESIDIO
PL

BRIDLE CREEK CI

GROVEVIEW
WY

CLEARBROOK CT

FOOTHILL RANCH DR

JACKSON AL

PARADISE VALLEY CT

LAURELGROVE LN
DUKE
CT

BLAIR AV

FRANK BROWN LN

FUNDY CT

PARKER AV

SANDY CT

HAWKINSLN
M
ANLEY
DR
ISABEL
VIRG
INIA
DR

METCALF CT

FIELDVIEW DR
EVERG
REEN
W
Y

REYES CT

GARDENIA CT

BONIFACIO
DR

TONY STUITT CT

SABRINA WY

HEATHERFIELD
W
Y

RIVIERA CT

LOWELL AV

DILLON CT

VIVIAN LN
TRAVAO
LN

ALEGRE DR

TW ENTY-THIRD ST

CARREEN
CT

GEORGIA CT

SUELLEN DR

WOODCREST CT

HIGHLAND AV

SCARLETT PL

JEFFERSON PK

BESSIE AV

BELLE CT

LOCUST DR

HINTZ AV

WESTLEIGH CT

ALZIRA CT

PAUL POOLE DR

SCOTT ST

STANDRIDGE RD

CHESTER DR

ALEXIS LN

GAINES LN

VALLERAND RD

COSTA CT

SOUTHBRO
OK
ST

SCHLEIGER DR

LOUISE AV
HULL
CT

ASKREN DR NEVES ST

ROOSEVELT AV

MADERA CT

DUNCAN DR

BEVERLY PL
BEN
ING
RAM
LN

FOXHOLLOW
W
Y

ANTONIA CT

ETTA W Y

SWARTHOUT CT

ARNAUDO
LN

VERANDA CT

SPRING VALLEY WY

PLANTATION CT

EATON AV
FOO
THILL
VISTA
DR
O
RCHARD
PK
LO
RETO
CT

WOODLANDLN

BROOKS LN

CAMELLIA DR

MARIE AV

WILLOW WY

LINDA PL

DRONERO WY

TAMMI CT

GILLETT AL

YELLOWSTONE AV
DRO
NERO
CT

TOLBERT DR

MEADOW LARK LN

VALENCIA DRCOCHRAN DR
M
AM
IE

ANDERSO
N
LN

HOOT OW L CT

COLLIN AV
MAY AL

BETTY LN

MICHELLE AV

REYES LN
SAFFRO
N
DR

BRIDLE CREEK CT

WYMAN WY

BRIAR LN

MERCHANT CT

SAFFRON CT

MANOR CT

BENNETTCT

EIGHTH ST

WALL ST

PALOMAR DR

ORCHID DR

HORSE SHOE LP

SILVERBERRY ST
W
O
ODLAND
CT

HENLEY PK

FERNGROVE CT

MELLO CT

TAF T AV

ADAM ST

CACTUS ST

SUNPEAK
LN

MC PEAK CT

COUPE PL

JENNI LN HEATHER CT

W AGNER CT

MILLER CT

JOHNSON CT

BUTLER CT
CHARTW
ELLLN
G
RACE
CT

HILL VIEW WY

GALLERY DR

RADCLIFF CT

HOMER HENRY CT

PAYNE AL
FOREST
HILLS
DR

ASH TREE CT

BYRON RD

AUDREYDR

EAGAN AL

PARTRIDGE LN

OCTAVIA CT

REDINGTO
N
CT

GENTRY LN

JASMINE CT
SAN
RO
CCO
CT

BRISTOLLN

SPRINGHILL
CT

DOROTHY LN

GOMES DR

WINDELER AV

LILLY CT

WAVERLY CT
SOLOM
O
N
CT

CHAMBERS CT
M
ASO
N
CT

ALENE AV

NEWPORT CT

BEECHNUT AV
TEAKW
O
OD
W
Y

PALOMAR CT

SIMMS LN

DOE TRAIL LN
YO
UNG
CT

MERCHANT DR

APPLEAPRICOTPEACHCHERRY
M
ARINE
CT

RUGBY CT

FOXTAIL CT

ANNIE WY

GOMES CT

WHITTIER AV

DIXON CT

RHETT CT

ROBERTSONDR

SPENCER LN

FLORENTINE
W
Y

RAY M GUITERREZ LN

HERFORDLN

SPENCER CT
CO
BALT
CT

MADISON AV
M
ARTIN
RD

TWENTY-SECOND ST
PONTE
M
IR
A
W
Y

TWENTY-FIRST ST

BUSCA DR

SEVILLE DR

CHOISSER CT

COVENTRY DRELSINORE DR

BLANDFORD LN

CHRISTINA DR

PEPPERCORN LN

REMY JAVIER CT

HARDING AV

WILSON AV

COOLIDGE AV

JONES LN

DOVER LN

CINDY WY
VELASQ
UEZ
LN

ATLANTA DR

BONDY LN

RUSHER ST

CARDOZA RD

JEFFREY DR

CAMPBELL LN

NAGLEE RD
KING
LP
LONNAW
Y

GARY LN

HOLDER LN

TOSTE RD
205 ONRAMP

MARLIN PL

VALERIE LN
JOE
POMBO
PK

PAVILIONPK
PALM
CI

BERG RD
UP RR

KROHNRD
205 OFFRAMP
12"
12"
12"
8"
14"
12"
12"
12"
14"
12"
12"
8"
8"
14"
10"
16"
8"
8"
10"
8"
16"
12"
8"12"
8"
14"
8"
8"
8"
10"
12"
14"
8"
16"
12"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
16"
8"
8"
10"
8"
8"
8"
8"
18"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
6"
36"
8"
12"
8"
8" 10"
6"
8"
10"
8"
18"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
12"
8"
14"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"10"
10"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
8"
8"
10"
8"
16"
8"
8"
6"
10"
8"
8"
8"
4"
10"
8"
12"
8"
12" 8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
6"
8"
8"
8"
12"
8"
12"
8"
16"
8"
12"
8" 8"
6"
10"
8"
10"
8"
12"
6"
8"
10"
8"
12"
12"
6"
10" 8"
10"
8"
16"
6"
6"
6"
6"6"
8"
4"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
10"
12"
8"
10"
4"
6"
8"
18"
8" 8"
8"
16" 16"
12"
8"
6"
12" 8"
10"
6"
6"
12"
8"
4"
6" 6"
4"
8"6"
12"
6"
8"
8"
12"
10"
6"
8"
12"
8"
12"
10"
12"
12"
12"
14"
6"
16"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
12"
18"
8"
6"
12"
6"
8"
10"
12"
16"
8"
18"
8"
14"
12"
12"
8"
16"
8"
4"
12"
6"
12"
8"
6"
6"
8"
8"
6"
8"
4"
6"
12"
12"
12"
6"
6"
12"
12"
8"
8"
14"
8"
18"
14"
4"
4"
16"
6"
6"
16"
12"
18"
4" 4"
10"
12"
12"
4"
12"
6"
16"
12"
8"
10"
8"
6"
12"
18"
12"
6"
6"
12"
12"
8"
12"
12"
8"
12"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8" 8"
8"8"
8"
Berg Road
Subdivision
I-205
Corridor
Larch-Clover
I-205
Expansion
Berg /
Byron
Remainder
UR 5
(Bright)
18"
24"
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-B3
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C2 C3 C4
B1 B2 B4
A1 A2

GILLETT AL

NINTH ST
HOLLY
DR

GARNER AL

ELEVENTH ST

EIGHTH ST

JACKSON AL

SEVENTH ST
F ST

SIXTH ST

KAVANAGH AV

GRANT LINE RD

CLOVER RD

LOWELL AV

EMERSON AV

WHITTIER AV

TWENTIETH ST
UP RR
D ST

ROYAL CT

EAST ST

PINTADO CT

SPUR LINE RR

CABE RD
BUNG
ALO
W
S
DR

ACACIA ST

PESCADERO AVPRESTON
W
Y

CENTRAL AV

EL PORTAL ST
E ST

CHERYL CT

TONI CT

TWELFTH ST

COLONYDR

POMBO SQUARE DR
M
AC
ARTHUR
DR

BOLEYN CT

BALBOA DR

ESSEX CT

CABRILLO DR

EAGAN AL

W INSTON CT

TONI LN

FRANKLIN AV

ERNEST DR

RANCHERO WY
LO
NDO
N

DR SURREY DR

DERECHO WY

CASTLE CT
MEL RD
MAE AV

CIVIC CENTER PZ

HIGHLAND AV

GRAHAM CT

CROWLEY CT

FINE AV

CABRILLO
CT

DARRIGO DRGRUNAUER AL

TENTH ST

PORTOLA W Y

ENTRADA WY

PARADISE CT

SCHOOL ST
M
ARY
JEAN
LN

JEANETTECT

MANZANITA LN

BERVERDOR AV

HAMILTON AL

CARMELO AV
CIVIC
CENTER
DR

EATON AV

BEVERLY PL

HOLLYWOOD AV

CARLTON WY

CAROL LOUISE LN

FINALEW
Y

RAMONA WY

SKYLARK WY

STONEBRIDGE DR

TW ENTY-FIRST ST

LAGUNA DR

TWENTY-SECOND ST

MARIANI CT

ALVARADO W Y

CORONADO W Y

GRANADA WY

DEBORAH
ST

CHABOT CT

PEREIRA AV

CHRISMAN RD

BANTA RD

LORAMAR LN

PARADISE DR

PARADISE AV

BRICHETTO RD

PARADISE RD
12"
12"
10"
6"
18"
6"
16"8"
20"
12"
8"
12"
10"
8"
8"
8"
10"
6"
8"
6"
8"
16"
16"
16"
18"
16"
10"
12"
8"
8"
12"
8"
8"
8"
10"
8"
6"
12"
8"
6"
8"
18"
12"
8"
8"8"
8"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 8"
18"
6"
12"
12"6"
16"
8"
6"
8"
6"
6"
12"
6"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
6"
18"
16"
12"
6"
6"
20"
12"
8"
6"
6"
14"
6"
8"
6" 12"
16"
12"
16"
12"
6"
4"
6"
16"
6"
8"
10"
16" 16"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
16"
12" 12"16" 16"
16"
12"
12"
Industrial
Areas
I-205
Corridor
Northeast
Industrial
Area
East Side
Industrial
UR 1
Chrisman
Road
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-B4
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C2 C3 C4
B1 B2 B3
A1 A2
580
Cal i f o r n i a A q u e d u c t
D e l t a - Me n do t a
C an a l

PATTERSON PASS RD
M

OUNTAIN
HO
USE
PK
UP RR

COMMERCE CT

COMMERCE WY

GATEWAY BLSCHULTE CT

BERKELEY RD

HOPKINS RD

SCHULTE RD

STANFORD RD

CORPORATE CT
580 OFFRAMP
580 ONRAMP

MIDWAY RD

VIA NICOLO RD
12"16"
16"
14"
12"
12"
14"
24"
16"
12"
Cordes
Ranch
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-C1
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C2 C3 C4
B1 B2 B3 B4
A1 A2
6 580
C a l i f o r n i a A q u e d u c t
D e l t a - M e n d o t a C anal

LAMMERS RD

SCHULTE RD
HUTTO
N
PL

HANSEN RD
SA
USA
LITO
W
Y

PERRY CT

ABIGAIL CT

PATINACT
KADEN
W
Y

REDBRIDGE RD

REMINGTONWY

JAGUAR RN
UP RR

PROMONTORY PK

VALPICO RD

HOPKINS RD

HOOD WY
16"
24"
12"
20"
12"
12"
24"
24"16"
12"
16"
12"
16"
8"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
8"
8"
12"
24"
24"
20"
16"
16"
16"
20"
24"
12"
12"
12"
20"
8"
12"
12"
8" 8"
8"
12"
8"
Cordes
Ranch
Westside
Rocking Horse
West Side
Industrial
UR 5
(Bright)
16"
16"
24"
24"
16" 16"
20"
12"
12"
12"
12"
20"
16"
0 1,000500
Scale in Feet
Figure F-C2
City of Tracy
Water System Master Plan Update
Last Saved: 10/15/2020 3:20:15 PM N:\Clients\404 Tracy\12-18-41 Water Master Plan Update\GIS\MXD\Appendix Figures\AppF_Sheets.mxd : nhoman Proposed Buildout Program Facilities
Buildout Pressure Regulating Station
Buildout Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout Booster Pump Station
Buildout Groundwater Well
Buildout Storage Tank
Proposed Buildout Clearwell
Buildout System Pipeline
Proposed Buildout Non-Program (NP) Facilities
Buildout NP Pressure Reducing Valve
Buildout NP Booster Pump Station
Buildout NP Storage Tank
Buildout NP Pipeline
Proposed 2025 Program Facilities
2025 Pressure Reducing Valve
2025 System Pipeline
2025 Pipeline CIP
Proposed 2025 Non-Program Facilities
2025 Non-Program Pipeline
Existing System Facilities
Existing Pressure Regulating Station
Existing Pressure Reducing Valve
Existing Booster Pump Station
Existing Groundwater Well
Existing Storage Tank
Existing System Pipeline
Proposed Existing System Pipeline CIP
5 580
E1 E2
D1 D2 D3
C1 C3 C4
B1 B2 B3 B4
A1 A2

HICKORY AV
SEQ
UO
IA
BL

SIXTH ST

BARCELO
NA
DR

THAMES DR

SOUTH ST

ABINGDONWY

VALPICO RD

JEFFERSON LN

WELLINGTON DR

CORRAL HOLLOW RD

PERRY LN

TRACY BL

WEST ST

REMINGTON WY

RIALTO CT