Agenda packet — Turlock City Council, April 28, 2026 (part 2 of 3)

FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
the performance of the Lead Agency’s contracts with third parties pursuant to Government Code § 8546.7, the project sponsor, its contractors and subcontractors and the State shall each maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above referenced parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire project period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment. The State, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of the State, shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to a project for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and the Lead Agency shall furnish copies thereof if requested.

3. The Lead Agency, its contractors and subcontractors will permit access to all records of employment, employment advertisements, employment application forms, and other pertinent data and records by the Civil Rights Department, or any other agency of the State of California designated by the State, for the purpose of any investigation to ascertain compliance with this document.

F. Special Situations
Caltrans may perform an audit and/or request detailed project information of the project sponsor’s LCTOP funded projects at Caltrans’ discretion at any time prior to the completion of the LCTOP.

I certify all these conditions will be met.

Gary Hampton Interim City Manager
(Print Authorized Agent) (Title)

April 28, 2026
(Signature) (Date)

Page 300 of 546 ends

Yes Yes
22 4
5 13
Years
Months
Stanislaus County
www.cityofturlock.org
Stanislaus Council of Governments
10 Lead Agency Name: City of Turlock
Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP: Cycle A
Lead Agency Information
Is your Cycle A and Cycle B project the same? Yes
Allocation Request Prepared by Contact (if different than "Prepared by") Name: Richard Green Name: Wayne York
Caltrans District:

Does your agency have an approved Title VI Plan? Approved Date: 01/26/23 Title VI Attached:

County:

Agency Website:

Regional Planning Agency:
156 S. Broadway #230
Turlock, CA, 95380
Name: Gary Hampton Assembly*:

Title: Interim City Manager Senate*:

E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Authorized Agent Legislative District Numbers
Title: Transit Analyst Title: Transit Manager
Phone #: 209-669-2802 Phone #: 209-669-2800
Sub-Type: Implementation of free or reduced fares
Start date (anticipated) : 7/1/2026 End date (anticipated) : 07/31/2027 Project Summary
Name: No more
than 2 lines
Free Fares Project
Description
(Short): No
more than 375
characters.

This Free Fares Project will offer free rides to the general public during the regionally recognized promotional period of the month of July for both 2026 and 2027. This will encourage ridership and promote public transportation, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Type: Operations
Phone #: 209-668-5540 Congressional*:

E-mail [email protected] *if you have additional Districts, please provide a separate attachment Turlock Transit will provide free fares for transit services during the month of July 2026 and July 2027.

Project Life: For capital projects, state the project useful life in years. For operation projects, state the number of months a service will be funded.

Capital:

Operations: 13
Request LONP: Your agency has selected a start date prior to estimated Award Date of October 1 2026, please provide an explaination of your need to start your project before the Award Date. $133,425
Rollover Projects: Please provide the total number of years your agency plans to accumulate funds and how many years remaining, include this year.

Rollover Project: No
Total Years of Rollover:

Remaining Years of Rollover:

Funding: 99313: $128,804 99314: $4,621 Total:

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 1 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 301 of 546 ends

LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Funding Information
Allocation Yr Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $4,621
Total LCTOP: $0 $98,833 $34,592 $0 $0 $0 $133,425
PUC 99314: $3,423 $1,198
Total
PUC 99313: $95,410 $33,394 $128,804
$0 $133,425
Other Funds: $5,879 $5,879
Total CCI: $0 $98,833 $34,592 $0 $0
$0
Other GGRF: $0
LCTOP Interest:

Contact Person: Wayne York 99313
Contact Phone #: 209-669-2800 $4,621 99314
$0 $139,304
Lead Agency: City of Turlock Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Total: $0 $98,833 $40,471 $0 $0
Contact Phone #: 209-525-4891 99314
Contact E-mails: [email protected]
Contributing Sponsor: Stanislaus Council of Governments Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: Jean Foletta $128,804 99313
Contact E-mail: [email protected]
Contact E-mails:

PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: 99313
Contact Phone #: 99314
Contributing Sponsor: Amount:

Contributing Sponsor: Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: 99313
Contact Phone #: 99314
Contact E-mails:

Contributing Sponsor: Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: 99313
This project will utilize LCTOP funds and LTF funds. LCTOP funds will not supplant other funding sources and the project could not continue without the contribution of LCTOP funds.

Detailed Funding Information: This section should be completed to detail any CAP funds included in the “Prior” column, include the Project ID, amount of funds transferred, and CAP approval date(if available).

No prior funds are being applied to this project.

Total FY 24-25 LCTOP Funding $133,425
Fully Funded Project: Provide a description of all the funds that will be used to complete this project and how LCTOP funds will not supplant other funding sources. Include the project ID and awarded funding amount from prior rollover years.

Contact Phone #: 99314
Contact E-mails:

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 2 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 302 of 546 ends

LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Funding Plan
Total Project Funding
$0 $0
R/W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PS&E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY 28-29 Total
PA&ED $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 $0 $139,304
TOTAL $0 $98,833 $40,471 $0 $0 $0 $139,304
Operations/Other $0 $98,833 $40,471 $0 $0
$0 $0
Veh/Equip Purchase $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0
PS&E $0
PA&ED
Funding Source: Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 Total $0
Operations/Other $98,833 $40,471 $139,304
Equipment Purchase
$0
CON $0
R/W
FY 28-29 Total
PA&ED $0
$0 $139,304
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 TOTAL $0 $98,833 $40,471 $0 $0
$0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Total
PA&ED $0
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
Total
PA&ED $0
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Funding Plan
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 3 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 303 of 546 ends

Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 $0
R/W $0
PS&E
FY 28-29 Total
PA&ED $0
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
Total
PA&ED $0
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Total
PA&ED $0
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
Veh/Equip Purchase $0
CON
Total
PA&ED $0
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
Veh/Equip Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Funding Source:

Page 304 of 546 ends

3) Project Costs - Provide an itemized breakdown of project components and describe how the cost estimations were developed. Please include marketing and bus wraps cost in this section. Total costs must correspond to the Funding Information section above. No more than 14 lines.

Based on the current fare rate ($2.00) and the average ridership on weekdays (1,374), Saturdays (646), and Sundays (502) during July, adjusted up 10% for anticipated ridership growth, and considering the number of days for each free ride period, the City determined the following costs for the following free fare periods: Free months of July 2026 ($70,380) and July 2027 (68,924). The total project cost is $139,304 and will cover fixed route trips only.

LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Project Information
1) Project Description - Provide a comprehensive project description. For operations projects, include: #of trips, span, frequency improvements, days of operation and marketing component (if applicable). For capital projects, include:
product specifications and identify all LCTOP funded components. No more than 14 lines.

Turlock Transit will provide free fares to the general public for transit services during the months of July 2026 and July 2027. The free rides are provided Monday through Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on all modes for the entire month of July for both years. The specific dates were selected in coordination with the Stanislaus Regional Transit Authority (StanRTA) to ensure continuity in the Stanislaus region, as well as support enhanced and expanded transit efforts during the Stanislaus County Fair (July). The project will provide free fares in disadvantaged communities to increase ridership and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The goal of this project is to incentivize fixed route transit ridership growth. While free rides are provided on all modes, the project is for free rides on fixed route only. With a project estimate of $139,304 and standard fares of $2.00 the project is expected to provide 69,582 passenger trips.
2) Project Planning - Provide a detailed explanation of the project planning process and how it was designed to avoid substantial burden on any low- income, disadvantaged, and vulnerable populations. Include any public outreach, events, workshops or community input. No more than 14 lines.

This project was discussed with community stakeholders, including disadvantaged community members, during the previous Short-Range Transit Plan development process and there was broad support for it. In addition, the City has conducted similar projects in the past few years, also coordinated with neighboring agencies, and both the other agencies and the passengers have expressed support for it. Given the nature of the deployment, it benefits all users, not specific demographics.

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 5 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 305 of 546 ends

5) Agency Service - Describe the transit service provided and how the project plays into the overall operations. . No more than 2450 characters.

Turlock Transit operates seven fixed routes and paratransit service throughout the City Monday-Friday (6am-9pm) and Saturday (9am-7pm). Turlock Transit also provides On-Demand service to the city of Turlock and nearby community of Denair. The operating hours for all services are the same. The Free Fare Program would provide free transit rides to all residents during normal operating hours, as well as extended and enhanced service during a portion of July (as part of the Stanislaus County Fair). These enhanced services will include shuttles from the Fairgrounds to the Transit Center as well as extended hours and operating days for regular fixed routes to match the operating days/hours of the Fair. 6) AB 680 Workforce Standards to Support Job Quality -As part of your FY 25-26 LCTOP Allocation Request Packet please include an electronic copy of your agency's most recently approved procurement manuals.

YesDid you submit your approved procurement manual as part of your FY 25-26 LCTOP Allocation Request Packet?
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Agency Information
4) Agency Fare - Describe your agency's fare structure including any discounts or special fares and how the project will affect that structure, if at all. No more than 16 Lines.

Turlock Transit fixed route fares include a standard $2.00 All-Day pass, a $1.00 Discount pass, a $30.00 30-Day pass, and a $15.00 Discount 30-Day pass. For the purposes of this project, and to ensure we minimize delays for boarding (i.e. not requiring presentation of qualifying ID for discount fare), we are utilizing the standard fare for all passengers. The project will provide free fares for all passengers for fixed route trips only.

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 6 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 306 of 546 ends

LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Project GHG Benefits
Project Yr. 1 Ridership Increase - Estimated
annual ridership contributed by the new
service or capital improvement in Yr1.
2,522
Estimations are based on previous year's ridership in
the same period. However, we anticipate a 2-4%
increase in ridership over the previous fiscal year.

Project Yr. F Ridership Increase - Estimated
annual ridership contributed by the new
service or capital improvement in YrF.
2,522
Year 1 (Yr1) - First year of service, or year
that capital improvements will be
completed.
2026
The project is expected to start July 1, 2026.

Year F (YrF) - Final year that the service is
funded or the final year of useful life for
capital improvements.
2027
This project is expected to start July 1, 2027
Greenhouse Gas Reductions - Describe qualitatively how this project will reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The Free Fares Project will reduce traffic congestion and summer ozone levels by having more people use public transportation, instead of using their personal automobile to travel to employment centers, shopping malls, doctor offices, and recreational facilities, thus increasing ridership, reducing vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. The enhanced and extended services provided during the Stanislaus County Fair, provided for free to attendees, will further encourage more riders, particularly those that never considered the bus as an option due to the traditional operating hours and previous lack of "front door" service (proposed service would go to the front gate).

Greenhouse Gas Reductions - Please provide quantitative information requested below and explanations supporting the data provided.

Value Explanation
Total Project VMTs Reduced 4,655 This number is calculated based on the values above.

Total Project GHG Emission Reductions
(MTCO2e) 1.94 This number is calculated based on the values from above and the QM-Tool tab.

Project Useful Life 1 This is calculated based on the values above.

Total Project Ridership Increased 2,522 This is calculated based on the values above.

Adjustment (A) - Adjustment factor to
account for Choice Riders.Use defaults
values listed on

0.561
Adjustment factor for Local Transit Bus
Trip Length (L) - Length (miles) of average
auto trip reduced or average passenger trip
length. You may use defaults values list ed
on

3.29 NTD average trip length
FY 25-26 LCTOP Project GHG Emission
Reductions (MTCO2e) 1.94 This number is calculated based on the values from above and the QM-Tool tab.

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 7 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 307 of 546 ends

X
X
X
Transit Facility Parking Cost
($/Roundtrip/Rider) (Average cost to park to
use transit associated with project)
$0.00 No charge for parking at Transit Center
Avoided Parking Cost ($/Roundtrip/Rider)
(Average avoided parking cost associated
with project)
$10.00
Avoiding parking changes for the 10 days of the Stanislsus County Fair furing July through use of the free transit servcie and free transit shuttles.

Baseline Average One-Way Fare Cost
($/One-Way Trip/Rider) (Average fare per
boarding, prior to project implementation)
$2.00 Regular fixed route fare for A''-Day pass
New Average One-Way Fare Cost
($/One-Way Trip/Rider) (Average fare per
boarding resulting from project
implementation)
$0.00 Project will offer free fares during promotional periods.

Value Explanation
Travel Cost Savings Benefits
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Project Benefits
Co-Benefits - Describe benefits selected above and other benefits not listed.

Improved Public Health: The project will improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Stanislaus County is a designated nonattainment area for ozone and a maintenance area for carbon monoxide. The ozone classifications are extreme nonattainment for 1-hour and 8-hour zone measurements and moderate for carbon monoxide. PM 2.5 and PM 1.0 are classified as serious and is a maintenance area. Promotes Active Transportation: The project will encourage the use of public transportation, bicycling, and walking to destinations. All local buses are equipped with a bike rack to accommodate 2 bicycles each, providing a smooth system for securing bicycles.

Improved Public Health College Grades K-12
Reduced Operating/Maintenance Costs Promotes Active Transportation Increase System Reliability Promotes Integration w/ other modes Avoided Toll Cost ($/Roundtrip/Rider)
(Average avoided toll cost associated with
project)
$0.00 (ex. The average tolling cost in the project area is $10 per day)
Co-Benefits - Check all additional Benefits/Outcomes.

Improved Safety Coordination with Educational Institution Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 8 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 308 of 546 ends

X
X
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Community Engagement Co-Benefit
To estimate the community engagement co-benefit, users will respond to the five questions below. Based on the responses to the questions, the level of community engagement will be evaluated as low, medium, or high. 1) Is the project being proposed for LCTOP funding, a neighborhood-scale, city/regional-scale, or rural-scale project? City/Regional
h. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by a community- based organization, community-driven steering committee, or similar entity designed, planned, and implemented the project in whole or in significant part.

5. Considering all input opportunities, which of the following statements are true (check all that apply):
a.    The participants comprised a broadly representative sample of the population potentially benefiting from, or affected by, the project.
b. Project proponents identified key community leaders and organizations and engaged them directly. c. The events and input opportunities were hosted at varied and accessible times and locations throughout the area potentially affected by the project and included both in person and online forms of engagement. Events and written materials were offered in languages other than English. d. The participation process was conducted or assisted by a professional facilitator or public participation expert.
b.    Solicited and recorded written or spoken input from the community about specific aspects of the project or potential project alternatives before decisions on those aspects and alternatives were finalized. c.    Incorporated proposals or ideas from the community into project alternatives or components. d.    Reported back to the community on how the input in 4(b) and 4(c) was incorporated. e. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by having one or more workshops or other meetings in which the community developed a project alternative or specific component to address unmet community needs, which was subsequently included in the project’s application for funding or final design.
f. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by formal cooperation with a community-based organization (i.e., via a memorandum of understanding, community benefits agreement, steering committee, labor agreement, etc.) to acquire or distribute funding, identify project alternatives or project components, or otherwise enhance community engagement in project design, planning and implementation.
g. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by delegation of authority to choose between project alternatives or components to the community through a steering committee, organized voting process, representative community-based organization, or other means. 2) With regard to public events held by the project proponent to discuss this project proposal with the community, what was the approximate total attendance at those events? 30 3) With regard to other opportunities provided by the project proponent for community members to comment or provide input on the project, beyond those included in question 2, what is the approximate total number of people who provided commentary or input on the project through these opportunities?
10 4) Which of the following took place as part of the events & other opportunities identified? (Check all that apply):
a.    Informed the community about various aspects of the project, including the process by which major decisions about the project would be made.
e. The project proponents, or those acting on their behalf, prepared and followed a community engagement plan that meets the minimum criteria originally established by the Transformative Climate Communities Program Priority Population Community Engagement: Identify the specific assessment for the Community Engagement Co-benefit (High, Medium, Low): Medium
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 9 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 309 of 546 ends

Is the project located outside of a disadvantaged community, but within 1/2 mile of a disadvantage community and within a low-income census tract? Yes
Step 2 - Identify a Need: Review the options and select one that explains how the community or household need for the priority population identified in Step 1 was determined.

Priority Populations Community Needs Description: Describe the community or household need and how it was identified. If option “B. Local Documentation” was chosen, briefly describe the documentation. If option “C. Data Tools” was chosen, include the name of the tool in the description.

A. Direct Engagement: Engage local residents and community groups in meetings, workshops, or other opportunities as part of the planning process to identify community or household needs, and document how the engagement informed the design and/or selection of projects to address those needs.

Does your Agency's Service Area have a Disadvantaged Community? (as defined by SB 535) Yes Is the project located within the boundaries of a Disadvantaged Community census tract? Yes Is the project located within the boundaries of a Low-Income community census tract? Yes Priority Populations Benefits
Step 1 - Identify the Priority Population: Determine if the project is at least partially located within a Priority Population census track or will benefit Priority Population households.

Agency can meet the DAC requirement by meeting any of the SB 1119 Project Criteria:

Is the project a transit fare subsidies or network and fare integration technology improvements, including, but not limited to, discounted or free student transit passes Yes
Is the project a purchase of zero-emission transit buses and/or purchase and installation of supporting infrastructure?
No
Is the project a new or expanded transit service that connects with transit service serving a disadvantaged communities?
No
Amount of FY 25-26 funds to benefit Low-Income Community: $33,356 Amount of FY 25-26 fund to benefit Low-Income Households and Residents within 1/2 mile of a DAC: $33,356 Total Amount of FY 25-26 LCTOP funds to benefit Priority Population (Total should not exceed total FY 25-26 LCTOP project funding): $133,425 Step 3 - Provide a Benefit:Review the options below and select one that demonstrates how the project directly benefits the priority population identified in Step 1 and addresses the need identified in Step 2.

Priority Population Benefit: Select the benefit
your project provides to the community or
household.

B. Project provides increased access to clean and/or shared transportation options.

Please provide the amount of FY 25-26 LCTOP funds estimated to benefit Priority Populations.

Amount of FY 25-26 funds to benefit a Disadvantage Community (If you have a DAC, at least 50% must benefit a DAC) : $66,713 Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 10 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026

Page 310 of 546 ends

City Council Staff Report
April 28, 2026

From: Christopher Fisher, Municipal Services Director
Prepared by: Fred Pezeshk, P.E., Roads Program Manager
Agendized by: Gary Hampton, Interim City Manager

1. ACTION RECOMMENDED:

Motion: Approving Amendment No. 7 for Task Order No. 7 under the terms of the Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2023-110) with Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. dba Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group (Clovis, California office) for Engineering Design Services for the City of Turlock’s Roads Initiative Program in the amount of $422,387.49 to be funded by Fund 115 “Measure A – Roads” under City Project No. 26-015 “Provost & Pritchard Task Order No. 7 for Roads Program CIP Projects,” and authorizing staff to proceed with advertising for construction of said City Project upon completion of bid documents

Motion: Approving Amendment No. 8 for Task Order No. 8 under the terms of the Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2023-110) with Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. dba Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group (Clovis, California office) for Engineering Design Services for the City of Turlock’s Roads Initiative Program in the amount of $707,220.78 to be funded by Fund 115 “Measure A – Roads” under City Project No. 26-016 “Provost & Pritchard Task Order No. 8 for Roads Program CIP Projects,” and authorizing staff to proceed with advertising for construction of said City Project upon completion of bid documents

2. NARRATIVE:

The Master Agreement between the City of Turlock and Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group (City Contract No. 2023-110) stipulates that the scope of services and fees associated with specific projects will be agreed upon through task orders approved under the terms of the Master Agreement.

Staff is proposing the rehabilitation of the following street sections as logical groupings for design under two separate task orders as shown in the following tables along with the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for each segment:

City Project No. 26-015
"Provost & Pritchard Task Order No. 7 for Roads Program CIP Projects" Street Name From To PCI Length (ft) District
E. Tuolumne
Rd.

Geer Rd. Temple Ave. 8 315.00 1 & 3
Temple Ave. Bucknell St. 34 492.00 1 & 3
Bucknell St. Annhurst Ave. 38 253.00 1 & 3
Annhurst Ave. Meadowlark Dr. 0 666.00 1 & 3

Page 311 of 546 ends

Agenda Staff Report
4/28/2026

Meadowlark Dr. N. Olive Ave. 21 918.00 1 & 3
N. Olive Ave. 1111 E. Tuolumne
Rd.
83 850.00 1 & 3
1111 E. Tuolumne
Rd.

Colorado Ave. 0 462.00 1 & 3
Colorado Ave. Wellerman Wy. 0 541.00 1 & 3
Wellerman Wy. N. Berkeley Ave. 24 771.00 1 & 3
Total Length 5,268.00

City Project No. 26-016
"Provost & Pritchard Task Order No. 8 for Roads Program CIP Projects" Street Name From To PCI Length (ft) District
Temple Ave. Drexel Ave. E. Tuolumne Rd. 18 735.00 1
Duke Ct. Temple Ave. East End 20 190.00 1
Rutgers Ave. Temple Ave. Loyola Wy. 12 433.00 1
Drexel Ave. Temple Ave. Loyola Wy. 23 430.00 1
Loyola Wy. North Ave. Baylor Ave. 76 623.00 1
Baylor Ave. Drexel Ave. 21 279.00 1
Drexel Ave. Rutgers Ave. 24 462.00 1
Baylor Ave. Geer Rd. Annhurst Ave. 30 1,007.00 1
Asbury Ct. South End Baylor Ave. 11 384.00 1
Clemson Ct. South End Baylor Ave. 48 387.00 1
Annhurst Ave. Hanover Ave. Baylor Ave. 35 351.00 1
Baylor Ave. Vassar Ave. 31 745.00 1
Vassar Ave. E. Tuolumne Rd. 25 285.00 1
Vassar Ave. Annhurst Ave. N. Denair Ave. 26 548.00 1
Hanover Ave. Annhurst Ave. N. Denair Ave. 22 545.00 1
Xavier Ave. Hanover Ave. Vassar Ave. 24 1,089.00 1
N. Denair Ave. North Ave. Vassar Ave. 44 1,394.00 1
Piedmont Ave. N. Denair Ave. Rohrer Dr. 26 243.00 1
Rohrer Dr. North Ave. Piedmont Ave. 21 1,026.00 1
Hilda Ct. Rohrer Dr. East End 11 148.00 1
Lori Ct. Rohrer Dr. East End 18 154.00 1
Kirkland Ct. Rohrer Dr. East End 3 154.00 1
Total Length 11,612.00
Provost & Pritchard’s scope of services for each task order includes, in general, topographic survey, boundary survey for monument preservation, geotechnical investigations (pavement cores and soil sampling), pavement design, utility coordination, funding applications, development of Bid Documents, public outreach, Council presentations, and assistance during bid phase and construction phase. Environmental clearance is anticipated to be a categorical exemption under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It is anticipated

Page 312 of 546 ends

Agenda Staff Report
4/28/2026

that the bid documents for each project will be completed by late 2027. Both projects will then be advertised for bids, with due consideration given to the funding levels and availability of contractors.

The proposed amendment provides the scope of services, associated fees, and schedule for the required services for each project. Construction cost is estimated to range from $2.0 million to $4.0 million for City Project No. 26-015 and from $4.7 to $6.7 million for City Project No. 26- 016.

Per Resolution 2009-247, authorization from City Council is required prior to proceeding with bid advertising for “all capital improvement projects with a construction and project management estimate of greater than $1,000,000.” If staff waits for design to be completed before asking Council for authorization to bid, the project schedule will be delayed by 4-6 weeks and will significantly delay the start of construction. Therefore, staff requests that the Council authorize staff to proceed with advertising each project for construction upon completion of the bid documents.

3. FISCAL IMPACT / BUDGET AMENDMENT:

The fiscal impact of the proposed actions will be $422,387.49 for City Project No. 26-015 and $707,220.78 for City Project No. 26-016. Both projects will be funded by Fund 115 “Measure A – Roads”, account number 115-10-115.43366_001 “Design Roads.” Appropriate funds have been allocated during the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget process.

4. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Approving the amendments for the task orders described above will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Therefore, the proposed actions are not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15378 (Project) because each consists of “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment” and therefore is not considered a project.

5. ALTERNATIVES:

A. Council could choose not to approve the proposed Amendment No. 7 to the Master Agreement with Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will delay the process of design and construction of Roads Program CIP projects.

B. Council could choose not to approve the proposed Amendment No. 8 to the Master Agreement with Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will delay the process of design and construction of Roads Program CIP projects.

C. Council could choose not to approve authorizing staff to proceed with advertising these projects for construction upon completion of bid documents. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will extend each project schedule by several weeks, delaying the start of construction and the eventual completion of the project.

D. Provide staff with direction on how to proceed.

Page 313 of 546 ends

Agenda Staff Report
4/28/2026

6. ATTACHMENTS:

1. Amendment No. 7 for Task Order No. 7 under the terms of the Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2023-110) with Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group

2. Amendment No. 8 for Task Order No. 8 under the terms of the Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2023-110) with Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group

Page 314 of 546 ends

Page 1 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 7 for Task Order No. 7

AMENDMENT NO. 7 FOR TASK ORDER NO. 7
Under the Terms of the

MASTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TURLOCK
and
PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

DBA PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
for
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES (City Contract No. 2023-110)

City Project No. 26-015

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 7 for Task Order No. 7 under the terms of City Contract No. 2023-110 is entered into by and between the CITY OF TURLOCK, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. DBA PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP, a California corporation (“Professional”), on this ______ day of ___________ 2026 (the “ Effective Date of Task Order No. 7”). City and Professional may be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” or individually as “Party.” There are no other parties to this Amendment No. 7.

WHEREAS, the Parties hereto previously entered into a Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2023-110) dated April 25, 2023, for engineering design services to assist City with Design Services for Roads Program Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects (“Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Agreement stipulates that the scope of services and fees associated with specific projects will be agreed upon through task orders approved under the terms of Agreement by a written amendment to the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, City desires that Professional provide engineering design services for City Project No. 26-015 “Provost & Pritchard Task Order No. 7 for Roads Program CIP Projects;” and

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 7 for Task Order No. 7 provides the scope of services, associated fees, and schedule for said City Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Exhibit H, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby added to the Agreement.

2. Recital B of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

Page 315 of 546 ends

Page 2 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 7 for Task Order No. 7

B. Professional has made a proposal to City to provide such professional services. A description of the services Professional proposes to provide is included in the Scope of Services in Exhibits A through H attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Services”). City desires to retain Professional to perform the Services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

3. Recital C of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

C. The Parties anticipate that one or more projects for Services shall be determined through creation of a Task Order as a City -requested modification of services under Section 5.2 of this Agreement which shall be approved by written amendment to this Agreement. The Parties shall outline the schedule or timeline for providing the Services agreed upon under each Task Order (“Completion Schedule”), which shall be included in one or more written amendments to this Agreement. Such Completion Schedule is included in Exhibit H.

4. Recital D of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

D. The Parties shall outline the rates and method of payment to Professional for its performance of the Services under this Agreement as determined under each Task Order (“Compensation Schedule”), which shall be included in one or more written amendments to this Agreement. Such Compensation Schedule is included in Exhibit H.

5. Section 5 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

5.1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Professional shall provide City the Services described in Exhibits A through H. Any request for Services not included in Exhibits A through H will be considered a request for additional or modified Services (“ Modification” or “ Modifications”).

Professional shall not receive additional compensation for any Modification of the Services unless the Parties agree otherwise in a writing executed by both Parties.

5.2. City Requested Modification o f Services. City may, by written order, authorize Modifications to the Services described in Exhibits A through H. If such Modifications cause an increase in the cost or time required for performance of Professional’s Services, the Parties shall enter into a written amendment to this Agreement to adjust the Services and the compensation to be paid to Professional and, if necessary, amend the Completion Schedule or Compensation Schedule. The Services, Completion Schedule, or Compensation Schedule shall not b e revised unless City and Professional mutually agree to a written amendment to this Agreement reflecting such revisions, additional compensation, time for performance or such other terms or conditions mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

6. Section 6 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

Page 316 of 546 ends

Page 3 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 7 for Task Order No. 7

Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Professional will be allowed to include an amount for the anticipated salary increases as calculated per Exhibit 10-H1. City’s total compensation to Professional shall not exceed the cumulative amount resulting from each Task Order with each approved Amendment to the Agreement. The compensation for Amendment No. 7 shall not exceed Four-Hundred-Twenty-Two Thousand Three-Hundred-Eighty-Seven Dollars and Forty-Nine Cents ($422,387.49) for City Project No. 26-015 (“Maximum Payment”), unless the Parties mutually agree in writing otherwise.

7. Execution and Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously, and in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Parties agree that this Amendment and any other documents to be del ivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed utilizing services such as DocuSign and Nitro Sign, or by transmitting signatures in pdf or similar format, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this Agreement or such other documents are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility

8. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Term of the Agreement.

[Signatures on Following Page]

Page 317 of 546 ends

Page 4 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 7 for Task Order No. 7

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment No. 7 to be executed by and through their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

PROFESSIONAL

PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. DBA PROVOST & PRITCHARD
CONSULTING GROUP, a California
corporation

By:

Jeffrey Dorn, Director of Operations

Date
CITY

City of Turlock, a California
municipal corporation

By:

Gary R. Hampton, Interim City Manager

Date:

APPROVED AS TO SUFFICIENCY:

By:

Christopher Fisher,
Municipal Services Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Katie O. Lucchesi, City Attorney

ATTEST:

By:

Nichole Fiez, City Clerk

4/13/2026

Page 318 of 546 ends

455 W Fir Ave, Clovis, CA 93611 (559) 449-2700
www.provostandpritchard.com
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/24642fe2-810d-45bb-a4cb- 952a3ef6bb53/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_31.ppeng.egnyte.com/Tuolumne Rd Project Proposal.docx Engineering Structural Geostructural Surveying Planning Environmental GIS Construction Services Hydrogeology Consulting Clovis Visalia Bakersfield Modesto Los Banos Chico Sacramento Sonora San Luis Obispo Riverside Camarillo Boise, ID March 11, 2026
Fred Pezeshk
City of Turlock
156 South Broadway, Suite 150
Turlock, CA 93202
Subject: Engineering and Land Surveying Services for
City of Turlock’s Roads Program Task Order No. 7, Turlock, California Dear Fred Pezeshk:

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide engineering and land surveying services for the subject project. This proposal discusses our understanding of the project, recommends a scope of services together with associated fees, deliverables and approximate schedules, sets forth our assumptions and discusses other services that may be of interest as the project proceeds.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
It is our understanding that the City of Turlock intends to reconstruct a portion of East Tuolumne Road from Geer Road to Berkeley Avenue. The total project length is approximately 5,000 linear feet of roadway, with an estimated construction cost anticipated to range between $2,000,000 and $4,000,000.

The proposed street improvements will include pavement rehabilitation, removal and replacement of existing curb, gutter, and valley gutter to improve drainage, and replacement of existing pedestrian facilities to achieve ADA compliance (curb ramps, drive approaches, alley approaches). In addition, the design will incorporate intersection improvements at E. Tuolumne Rd and N. Olive Ave as well as E. Tuolumne Rd and Colorado Ave.

These improvements will include installation of video detection systems and pedestrian push buttons to enhance traffic operations and pedestrian safety.

We will also evaluate the existing bus stops in front of the Emanuel Cancer Center and, if necessary, provide design recommendations to ensure ADA compliance.

The project design will adhere to the current California Building Code (CBC), Chapter 11B accessibility requirements.

According to Figure 6-3 of the 2015 Turlock Active Transportation Plan, East Tuolumne Road is designated as a Class III Bike Route. The design will incorporate a Class III bike route in accordance with current California MUTCD standards.

Page 319 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 7 Page 2 of 7 Job No.: P25-911
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/24642fe2-810d-45bb-a4cb- 952a3ef6bb53/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_31.ppeng.egnyte.com/Tuolumne Rd Project Proposal.docx

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Our proposed scope of work for this proposal is segregated into several phases, described below.

PHASE SUR: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
Upon approval of the task order we will complete a field topographic survey and right of way verification for the segments of roadway described above.
 Capturing sufficient horizontal and vertical locations for top of curbs, gutter flow lines, pavement crowns, manhole covers, valve covers, utility covers, striping, and USA markings needed to design and prepare the proposed improvement plans.
 Verify existing right-of-way limits with record maps and physical street monuments and prepare a right-of-way basemap suitable for use in the design.
 Dip accessible manholes and drainage facilities to determine the depth of cover over existing gravity lines.
 Prepare a base drawing of collected survey data and utility information in AutoCAD Civil 3D format for use throughout the design process.

Up to 14 days of survey crew time will be required to complete the topographic survey for the entire project and prepare existing basemaps.

DELIVERABLES
Electronic basemap will be submitted to the City at the time of construction.

PHASE MON: PRE/POST CONSTRUCTION RECORD OF SURVEY & MONUMENT

PRESERVATION
The City has requested Provost & Pritchard include pre/post Construction record of survey and monument preservation for the project area. Provost & Pritchard will perform the following as part of this task:
 Research record monuments within project area.
 Field Survey to locate existing monuments.
 Set ties to allow for re-establishing any monument destroyed during construction  Post-construction field survey to locate all monuments that were existing pre-construction, replace any destroyed monuments
 File a post-construction corner record for all monuments that were reset

DELIVERABLES
Signed PDF copies of City’s Acknowledgment of Monument Responsibility “Pre-Construction” and Acknowledgment of Monument Responsibility “Post-Construction” and copies of pre-construction and post- construction corner records survey documents filed.

ASSUMPTIONS

1. It is assumed that the Contractor will construct monument wells per the city standard. P&P will set the monuments. Our budget includes replacing approximately 20 monuments.

Page 320 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 7 Page 3 of 7 Job No.: P25-911
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/24642fe2-810d-45bb-a4cb- 952a3ef6bb53/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_31.ppeng.egnyte.com/Tuolumne Rd Project Proposal.docx PHASE GEO: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Provost & Pritchard will work with our subconsultant, BSK, to provide needed geotechnical information.  BSK’s work will include up to six (6) shallow borings to three (3) to five (5) feet beneath ground surface (bgs) or until auger refusal in the roadway pavement. Pavement cores will be taken at each boring. The existing pavement section will be measured and bulk soil samples at each location will be obtained to analyze for new pavement design. Each boring hole will be backfilled with soil cutting and capped with asphalt cold patch or quick set concrete tinted black. The laboratory testing will incorporate physical and chemical tests to evaluate the percent passing the 200 gradation, R-value, corrosion potential (pH, soluble sulfates, and soluble chlorides), in-situ moisture content and dry density, and soil cement mix design. The geotechnical investigation report will include the following:
o Vicinity Map and Site Plan with boring locations
o Subsurface conditions, soil boring logs, depth to groundwater (if encountered) o Summary of laboratory test results
o Corrosion characteristics of on-site soils
o Recommendations for site preparation and earthwork
o Requirements for imported fill materials
o Recommendations for site drainage
o Recommendations for construction observations and testing and excavation suitability o Recommendations for conventional pavement section with asphalt concrete and Class II aggregate base
o Core information: AC and AB section thickness and thickness of other pavement materials encountered
 Recommendations for alternative pavement sections including recommendations for full-depth reclamation with cement (FDR-C), conventional pavement sections with the use of geogrid, and full- depth HMA
 The geotechnical report will be prepared under the supervision of, and signed by, a California Licensed Geotechnical Engineer.
 A City of Turlock encroachment permit will be secured prior to drilling and is anticipated to be provided without a fee. No other permits will be required.  Borings will require a lane closure and traffic control will be provided by a subcontractor, including general traffic control plans.

DELIVERABLES
Geotechnical report will be submitted to the City in PDF format.

PHASE UTL: UTILITY LOCATING
Provost & Pritchard expects to work with a subconsultant, MDR Utility Locating Specialists, to provide utility locating services. MDR will use ground penetrating radar (GPR) to locate existing underground utilities along the length of the project.

DELIVERABLES
Summary of utility locating findings will be submitted to the City in PDF format.

Page 321 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 7 Page 4 of 7 Job No.: P25-911
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/24642fe2-810d-45bb-a4cb- 952a3ef6bb53/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_31.ppeng.egnyte.com/Tuolumne Rd Project Proposal.docx PHASE DR: DRAINAGE STUDY
Provost and Pritchard will review available storm water plats and record drawings provided by the City to develop an understanding of the existing drainage patterns and facilities. After mapping the existing facilities, we will analyze the drainage patterns based on existing conditions and identify any drainage or ponding issues. Provost and Pritchard will make recommendations to the City as to how to improve drainage within the project area. We will then meet with the City to review the existing facilities, identified drainage problems, and potential solutions. The selected solutions will be incorporated into the improvement plans.

DELIVERABLES
Plan view only storm water exhibits will be submitted to the City in PDF format.

PHASE SD: 35% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
 Upon approval of the task order, we will conduct utility research and identify potential conflicts with record utilities. The City has provided plats and record drawings for their utilities. The utility information collected will be shown on an existing basemap prepared for the project.  We will prepare a schematic design set of plans for the project. We anticipate that our 35% plan set will include the following sheets:
o Cover sheet
o General Notes/ Legend / Abbreviation sheet
o Street Plan sheets (1”=20’ plan and profile view)
o Curb Ramp / Driveway/ Alley approach Detail sheets (1”=5’) o Signing and Striping sheets (1”=40’ double plan view) o Signal sheets
 Prepare Preliminary Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (EOPCC)  Improvements will be entirely within existing right-of-way and no additional right-of-way (ROW) acquisition will be required. If improvements are required to extend outside of existing ROW, we will prepare a ROW acquisition exhibit and the City will acquire any required ROW and/or Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs).
 Prepare Utility Relocation notification letters and Utility Relocation Exhibits. Any required utility relocation design will be provided by the utility companies.

Once the documents above are complete, we will attend an in person design review meeting with the City to discuss our 35% design. This will ensure that we are proceeding in accordance with the City’s direction before we begin preparing the construction documents.

DELIVERABLES
The plans, EOPCC and Utility Relocation Exhibits will be submitted to the City in PDF format only.

PHASE DD: 65% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Based on input received from City staff through the Schematic Design Phase, the design team will commence with engineering design and preparation of the construction documents to the 65% level.

Page 322 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 7 Page 5 of 7 Job No.: P25-911
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/24642fe2-810d-45bb-a4cb- 952a3ef6bb53/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_31.ppeng.egnyte.com/Tuolumne Rd Project Proposal.docx Our 65% submittal will include:
 65% Front End and Technical Specifications
 65% Construction Plans, expected to include:
o Cover sheet
o General Notes/ Legend / Abbreviation sheet
o Street Plan sheets (1”=20’ plan and profile)
o Curb Ramp / Driveway/ Alley approach Detail sheets (1”=5’) o Typical Section sheet
o Miscellaneous Detail sheets
o City Standard Detail sheets
o Traffic Control Plan Sheets (1”=40”)
o Signing and Striping sheets (1”=40’ double plan view) o Signal sheets
o Utility sheets
 Revised Preliminary Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs.  Revised Utility Relocation Exhibits per Utility Company’s comments.

We will attend an in person design review meeting with City staff to discuss our 65% construction documents.

DELIVERABLES
The 65% plans, specifications and EOPCC listed above will be submitted to the City in PDF format only.

PHASE CD: 95% AND 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
95% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
We will incorporate comments from the 95% plan review and feedback from City staff as we prepare our Final construction documents.

Our 95% submittal will include:
 95% Construction Plans (expected plan set as noted above)  95% Specifications
 Engineer’s opinion of probable construction costs
PREPARE 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
We will incorporate comments from the 95% plan review and feedback from City staff as we prepare our Final construction documents.

Our Final submittal will include:
 Final Construction Plans (expected plan set as noted above)  Final Specifications
 Engineer’s opinion of probable construction costs

Page 323 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 7 Page 6 of 7 Job No.: P25-911
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/24642fe2-810d-45bb-a4cb- 952a3ef6bb53/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_31.ppeng.egnyte.com/Tuolumne Rd Project Proposal.docx

DELIVERABLES
The plans and EOPCC listed above will be submitted to the City in PDF format only. Final project specifications will be submitted to the City in PDF and Word format.

PHASE BID: BIDDING ASSISTANCE
P&P will perform the following services to assist the City during the bidding phase of the project:
 Assist City in responding to requests for information and preparing addenda, if necessary.  City will conduct bid process. Our attendance at pre-bid meeting and bid opening will not be required.

PHASE CON: ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
P&P will perform the following services to assist the City during the construction phase of the project:
 Attend pre-construction conference
 Assist City with review shop drawings and submittals
 Provide interpretation and/or clarification of construction documents during construction in response to requests for information from the contractor  Assist City with review and provide technical information for construction contract change order requests if necessary
 Conduct up to two site visits at intervals appropriate to the state of construction  Prepare record drawings based on contractor’s as-built drawings.

ASSUMPTIONS

1. All scribed paint marking associated with requesting Underground Service Alert would not be required to be removed.

2. The City has prepared or will prepare all necessary environmental documents and will provide all identified mitigation measures.

3. The City will pay all permit fees, if required.

4. Construction staking, materials testing, labor compliance, construction management and construction administration will be provided by others under separate contract. Engineering Assistance during Construction will be provided according to the scope of work above.

5. Provost & Pritchard CAD standards and title block will be used for the design of this project. Provost & Pritchard’s current CAD version will be used.

PROFESSIONAL FEES
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group will perform the services on a time and materials basis for the fees shown in the table below and on the attached cost proposal. These fees will be invoiced monthly as they are accrued. Reimbursable expenses will be invoiced in addition to professional fees and are included in the estimated fees below. We will not continue to work beyond the authorized budget without additional authorization. Below is a summary of proposed fees.

Page 324 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 7 Page 7 of 7 Job No.: P25-911
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/24642fe2-810d-45bb-a4cb- 952a3ef6bb53/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_31.ppeng.egnyte.com/Tuolumne Rd Project Proposal.docx PROPOSED FEE – EAST TUOLUMNE ROAD

PHASE ESTIMATED FEE

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Phase SUR – Topographic Survey $37,962
Phase MON – Monument Preservation $14,990
Phase GEO – Geotechnical Investigation $25,100
Phase UTL- Utility locating $32,320
Phase DR – Drainage Study $10,539
Phase SD – Schematic Design $72,312
SUBTOTAL = $193,223

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Phase DD – 65% PS&E $103,475
SUBTOTAL= $103,475

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Phase CD – 95% PS&E and Final Docs $93,669
SUBTOTAL = $93,669

BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION
Phase BID – Bid Support $6,657
Phase CON – Construction Support $24,990
SUBTOTAL = $31,647
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE= $422,387.49
The line items shown above are estimates and are not intended to limit billings for any given Task. Required task effort may vary up or down from the line item estimates shown, however total billings will not exceed the total shown without additional authorization. If the scope changes materially from that described above, as a result of any agency’s decision or because of design changes requested by the Owner, we will prepare a revised estimate of our fees for your approval before we proceed.

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look forward to working with the City of Turlock on the Tuolumne Road Rehabilitation.

SCHEDULE
Once we receive a signed contract and are authorized to proceed, we will plan to proceed with the project in accordance with the attached schedule. Agency review time is outside of our control and any review time beyond the review times shown will delay the tasks that follow.

Sincerely Yours,
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Jeff S Dorn
RCE 76749, TE 2945
Director of Operations

Page 325 of 546 ends

TEMPLE AVE

BUCKNELL ST

ANNHURST AVE

GREENBORO ST

MEADOWLARK DR

N OLIVE AVE

E TUOLUMNE RD

GEER RD

ALLEYPAVEMENT LIMIT TO TIE INTORECENT IMPROVEMENTS

PAVEMENT LIMIT TO TIE INTORECENT IMPROVEMENTS

COLORADO AVE

FRANKS CTWALDORF DR

WELLERMAN WAY

N BERKELEY AVE

E TUOLUMNE RD

MEDIAN DELINEATIONIMPROVEMENTS

BUS STOP IMPROVEMENTS
www.provostandpritchard.comDATE:OFDESIGN ENGINEER:JOB NO:
2/17/2026 11:56 AM I:\Marketing\Proposals\2025\City of Turlock - Tuolumne Rd- 25-911\CAD\Tuolumne Rd Project Map.dwg -Thomas Hardy EAST TUOLUMNE ROAD RECONSTRUCTIONCITY OF TURLOCKSTANISLAUS COUNTYPROJECT MAPASFFEB 2026P25-91111 050100200SCALE IN FEET

LEGEND PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT LIMITSIMPROVED UNDER PREVIOUS CITYPROJECTPOTENTIAL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTSPROSPECTIVE CURB RAMPEXISTING NEWLY CONSTRUCTEDCURB RAMPVIDEO DETECTION AND PEDESTRIANPUSH BUTTON IMPROVEMENTS

MATCHLINESEE BELOW LEFT

MATCHLINESEE ABOVE RIGHT

Page 326 of 546 ends

As of: 3/11/2026
Task Begin End
Duration
(Weeks)
Duration
(Cal Days)
SUR: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 4/13/26 5/11/26 4 28
MON: RECORD OF SURVEY AND MONUMENT PRESERVATION4/13/26 5/11/26 4 28 GEO: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION4/13/26 5/11/26 4 28
UTL: UTILITY LOCATING 4/13/26 5/25/26 6 42
DR: DRAINAGE 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28
SD: SCHEMATIC DESIGN 6/8/26 8/3/26 8 56
CITY REVIEW- SD 8/3/26 8/17/26 2 14
DD: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 8/17/26 10/26/26 10 70
CITY REVIEW- DD 10/26/26 11/9/26 2 14
CD: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 11/9/26 1/4/27 8 56
CITY REVIEW- CD 1/4/27 1/25/27 3 21
FD: FINAL DOCUMENTS 1/25/27 2/22/27 4 28
3/23
3/30
4/6
4/13
4/20
4/27
5/4
5/11
5/18
5/25
6/1
6/8
6/15
6/22
6/29
7/6
7/13
7/20
7/27
8/3
8/10
8/17
8/24
8/31
9/7
9/14
9/21
9/28
10/5
10/12
10/19
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/23
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
12/28
1/4
1/11
1/18
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
SUR: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
MON: RECORD OF SURVEY AND…
GEO: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
UTL: UTILITY LOCATING
DR: DRAINAGE
SD: SCHEMATIC DESIGN

CITY REVIEW- SD
DD: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

CITY REVIEW- DD
CD: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

CITY REVIEW- CD
FD: FINAL DOCUMENTS
Tentative Project Schedule-

TUOLUMNE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
Deliverable
\\EgnyteDrive\Docs\Marketing\Proposals\2025\City of Turlock - Tuolumne Rd- 25-911\Working Drafts\Tuolumne_Fee Estimate.xlsx Page 1 of 1 Task Begin End
Duration
(Weeks)
Duration
(Cal Days)
SUR: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 4/13/26 5/11/26 4 28
MON: RECORD OF SURVEY AND MONUMENT PRESERVATION4/13/26 5/11/26 4 28 GEO: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION4/13/26 5/11/26 4 28
UTL: UTILITY LOCATING 4/13/26 5/25/26 6 42
DR: DRAINAGE 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28
SD: SCHEMATIC DESIGN 6/8/26 8/3/26 8 56
CITY REVIEW- SD 8/3/26 8/17/26 2 14
DD: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 8/17/26 10/26/26 10 70
CITY REVIEW- DD 10/26/26 11/9/26 2 14
CD: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 11/9/26 1/4/27 8 56
CITY REVIEW- CD 1/4/27 1/25/27 3 21
FD: FINAL DOCUMENTS 1/25/27 2/22/27 4 28

Page 327 of 546 ends

JEFFREY DORN, PE, TE
Project Manager
MICHAEL OSBORN, PE, CASp, LEED-AP
QA/QC

JEFFREY DORN, PE, TE

PROJECT MANAGER
Jeff Dorn has more than 20 years of professional experience, currently serving as Principal Engineer . With licenses in both civil and traffic engineering, his experience has been focused on transportation infrastructure design and providing ongoing consulting services for various public agencies. Jeff’s design experience includes the design of all types of surface transportation including roads, ADA-accessible sidewalks and curb ramps, bike/ pedestrian trail design, all classes of bikeways, and related work such as right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and storm water drainage design. His experience also includes grant writing, engineering report writing, front end and technical specifications, cost estimating, project management, and coordination with railroads, Caltrans, and other public agencies and utility companies.

MICHAEL OSBORN, PE, LEED-AP

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL
Michael Osborn is a senior engineer at Provost & Pritchard. With over 20 years of engineering experience, Mr . Osborn has been involved in a variety of public works, residential and commercial development, and educational facility projects. His areas of expertise include site grading design, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) site accessibility design and assessment, stormwater management, storm drainage, sanitary sewer systems design, street design, and site development.

ANNEMARIE FOX, PE

LEAD ENGINEER
Annemarie Fox has more than ten years of professional
experience, currently serving as Associate Engineer . She delivers civil engineering design for transportation, site development, and municipal infrastructure projects throughout California, including roadway rehabilitation, site grading and drainage design, utility coordination, stormwater infrastructure improvements, and traffic analysis for both public agency and private development clients.

She supports multidisciplinary design efforts from early planning through final design, coordinating with agencies such as Caltrans and local jurisdictions while addressing constructability, regulatory requirements, and long-term performance considerations.

THOMAS HARDY, EIT

PROJECT DESIGNER
Thomas Hardy has more than six years of professional experience, currently serving as Assistant Engineer . Thomas has an advanced proficiency in AutoDesk Civil 3D, including Vehicle Tracking, Pipe and Gravity Networks, Earthwork Analysis, Corridor Modeling, and Site Grading. He develops detailed plans, specifications, estimates, and design calculations for transportation and infrastructure projects while ensuring accuracy, efficiency, and compliance with engineering standards. Experienced in traffic modeling and simulation, he utilizes Synchro to optimize intersections, roundabouts, and interchanges, and applies data analysis to inform design improvements. Thomas also provides quality control reviews, guides internal design teams, and coordinates with interdisciplinary partners to deliver precise, reliable, and cost-effective engineering solutions.

BRYAN BOWERS, PLS

SURVEYOR
Bryan Bowers has more than 23 years of professional experience, currently serving as Licensed Surveyor. He has been involved with the supervision, planning, and execution of geodetic and conventional control surveys, topographic surveys, subdivision mapping, boundary surveys, subsidence monitoring, UAV
observation surveys, American Land Title Association/National Society of Professional Surveyors (ALTA/NSPS) surveys, boundary analysis/legal descriptions and construction staking.

CARRIE L. RODRIGUEZ, PE, GE

PRINCIPAL/GEOTECHNICAL GROUP MANAGER
Ms. Carrie Rodriguez is a licensed Geotechnical Engineer in the State of California with over 25 years of geotechnical and materials testing experience. She is responsible for managing and conducting geotechnical investigations including developing scope of work and budget, site reconnaissance, field classification of soils, sampling, design, and report preparation and review. Her design experience includes bridges, retaining walls, sound walls, roadway embankments, and pavement structural sections. She also manages field inspection and testing, data analysis, laboratory testing and construction special inspections.

ANNEMARIE FOX, PE
Lead Engineer

THOMAS HARDY, EIT
Project Designer

BRYAN BOWERS, PLS
Surveyor
CARRIE L. RODRIGUEZ, PE, GE
Geotechnical (BSK)
Roads Program - Task Order No. 7

KEY STAFF

Page 328 of 546 ends

691 N Laverne Avenue , Suite 101
Fresno, CA 9 3727
P 559.497.2880
www.bskassociates.com

Environmental, Geotechnical, Construction Services, Analytical Testing - An Employee-Owned Company

Sent via email: [email protected]

January 30, 2026 BSK Proposal G26000068

Annemarie Fox, PE
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
455 W Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93611

SUBJECT: Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Street Rehabilitation
Tuolumne Road Between Geer Road and Berkeley Avenue
Turlock, California

Dear Ms. Fox:

At your request, BSK Associates is pleased to s ubmit this proposal for the preparation of a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Report for the proposed roadway improvements in Turlock, California . Our current understanding of the project, scope of services, schedules, fees and assumptions for our services is provided below. We understand the project will be subject to prevailing wage s as determined by California Director of Industrial Relations (DIR).

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND BACKGROUND

Based on email correspondence from you on January 19, 2026, BSK understands that the project will encompass improvements along Tuolumne Road between Geer Road and Berkeley Avenue . The improvements are anticipated to include new pavement, repair or remove/replace curb, gutter and sidewalk, ADA ramps, driveway, and drainage improvements.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

The objective of the geotechnical investigation is to assess soil conditions and to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for the use by the project designers in preparation of the plans and specifications for the project. Based upon the above project understanding, BSK proposes the following scope of services, which will generally include a field exploration, laboratory testing program, engineering analyses, and report preparation.

Page 329 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000068 Street Rehabilitation – Tuolumne Road January 30, 2026
Turlock, California Page 2

Field Exploration

Our proposed drilling program will include a total of six (6) cores/borings to 3 to 5 feet beneath the existing ground surface (bgs) , or until auger refusal, in the roadway pavement. Pavement cores will be taken at each boring. We will measure the existing pavement section to within the nearest ½ inch and obtain bulk soil samples of the near surface soil at each location to analyze for new pavement design.

We will backfill each boring hole with soil cuttings or base rock, and cap with asphalt cold patch or quick setting concrete tinted black.

Test borings will be drilled using a diamond bit core barrel, and manually operated auger equipment.

The sampling of bulk and intact soil specimens for purposes of laboratory testing, and visually classifying soils exposed during the drilling process will be provided by a BSK Geologist or Engineer.

In order for BSK to complete the field investigation as described above, the project site must be readily accessible. Access limitations due to existing improvements may result in time delays and/or additional charges.

An arrangement to identify underground utilities is necessary prior to our field exploration. Prior to commencement of drilling operations, a BSK representative will visit the site to mark the test boring locations, evaluate site accessibility, and contact Underground Service Alert (USA) to determine if any of the test borings may conflict with detectable underground utilities. BSK will not be responsible for damage to underground utilities or other installations unless they are accurately marked on the ground surface and on plans made available to us at least 4 working days prior to beginning of field operations .

If requested, BSK may subcontract a private utility locator for an additional fee.

An e ncroachment permit with the City of Turlock will be secured prior to drilling. Permit fees are anticipated to be waived. It is understood no other permits will be required.

It is anticipated borings will require a lane closure, and traffic control will be provided by a subcontractor, including general traffic control plans.

Laboratory Testing

The laboratory testing program will incorporate physical and chemical tests to evaluate the percent passing the 200 gradation, R-value, corrosion potential (pH, soluble sulfates, and soluble chlorides) , in- situ moisture content and dry density, and soil cement mix design.

To aid in design of full depth reclamation, we will obtain bulk samples of the near surface soil and mix the soil with cement, and then conduct a compression test on the samples after 7 days. Three cement contents will be tested, with three samples at each percentage.

Page 330 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000068 Street Rehabilitation – Tuolumne Road January 30, 2026
Turlock, California Page 3

Geotechnical Analysis and Report Preparation

Based on the results of the field exploration and laboratory testing program, engineering analyses will be performed to evaluate site conditions and develop recommendations for site preparation procedures and engineering parameters for the proposed construction. Specifically, the report will incorporate the following items:

• Vicinity Map and Site Plan with boring locations
• Subsurface conditions, soil boring logs, depth to groundwater (if encountered) • Summary of laboratory test results
• Corrosion characteristics of on-site soils
• Recommendations for site preparation, and earthwork
• Requirements for imported fill materials
• Recommendations for site drainage
• Recommendations for construction observations and testing and excavation suitability • Recommendations for conventional pavement section with asphalt concrete and Class II aggregate base
• Core information: AC and AB section thickness and thickness of other pavement materials encountered
• Recommendations for alternative pavement sections including recommendations for full-depth reclamation with cement (FDR-C), conventional pavement sections with the use of geogrid, and full-depth HMA.

The geotechnical report will be prepared under the supervision of, and signed by, a California Licensed Geotechnical Engineer.

SCHEDULE

Work on this project will begin immediately upon receipt of your authorization to proceed with submittal of permit applications (as applicable), preparation of a Work Plan and field marking of our borehole locations for USA. We anticipate mobilizing for our geotechnical investigation within two (2) weeks of receiving notice to proceed, pending site access, encroachment permits, weather conditions and drill rig availability. We anticipate that drilling will be completed within one (1) working day and our laboratory testing program to be completed within three (3) week s following completion of our field work. Our written report will be submitted within two (2) week s following the completion of our laboratory testing program. Preliminary design recommendations may be provided prior to finalizing the report, as requested.

Page 331 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000068 Street Rehabilitation – Tuolumne Road January 30, 2026
Turlock, California Page 4

FEES

Fees for our services will be charged on a Time and Materials basis. Our fee will be invoiced monthly.

For the scope of services outlined in this proposal, our fee, approximately broken down by task, will be as follows:

Estimated Fee
Site Reconnaissance, Encroachment Permit Application,
Marking for USA $ 2,500
Field Exploration (includes 6 borings) $ 9,200
Laboratory Testing
(Includes one (1) FDR and one (1) R-Value) $ 4,800
Engineering Analysis and Report Preparation $ 3,600
Estimated Fee $20,100
Optional: Private Utility Locator
Initial here if desired: _________ $ 3,000
Plan Review or Post Report Consultation
Initial here if desired: _________ $ 2,000
Our fee applies to work commenced within 60 days of this proposal. The fees presented in this proposal are based on prompt payment for services presented in our standard invoicing format. Additional charges will be applied for specializing invoicing if backup documentation is needed. These special services will be charged on a time and expenses basis. Late fees will be charged if payment is not received in accordance with terms contained in our contract.

PROPOSAL ASSUMPTIONS

A detailed cost estimate for performing the required testing and inspection services during construction will be provided after the project plans and specifications are completed. This proposal and cost estimate were prepared based on the following assumptions:

• Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group will provide to BSK Associates, prior to mobilization, legal right of entry to the site (and other areas if required) to conduct the scope of services • Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group will notify BSK Associates, prior to mobilization, of any restrictions, special site access requirements, or known potentially hazardous conditions at the site (e.g. hazardous materials or processes, specialized protective equipment requirements, unsound structural conditions, etc.).
• Work can be performed during normal business hours (Monday through Friday, 7:00am to 7:00pm).
• Excess soil cuttings will be removed from the site.

Page 332 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000068 Street Rehabilitation – Tuolumne Road January 30, 2026
Turlock, California Page 5

• Prevailing wages apply. DIR Project ID will be provided prior to start of work. • Encroachment permits will be provided at no fee.
• Project meetings/conference calls, plan reviews , response to Agency review comments and construction services are not included in our estimate, but can be provided on request on a “time and materials” basis.
• BSK will retain soil samples for a maximum of sixty (60) days.

Please contact us immediately if you are aware of any inaccuracies in these assumptions and conditions, so we may revise the proposal or fee.

GENERAL CONDITIONS AND AGREEMENT

We understand that if this proposal is acceptable to the Client, an agreement for Professional Services will be sent to BSK and this proposal will be incorporated as an exhibit. Please note, if changes occur in the design of this project, BSK must be notified in writing and given an opportunity to revise our scope of work, if necessary.

CLOSING

BSK appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to you and we look forward to working with you on this project. Please contact the undersigned at [email protected] or (559) 278-2880, extension 516 if you have questions.

Respectfully submitted,
BSK Associates

Tolleman Gorham, PE Carrie Rodriguez, PE, GE
Project Engineer I Geotechnical Group Manager
CE 96089 GE 3016

Page 333 of 546 ends

PROPOSAL FOR CITY OF TURLOCK ROADS PROGRAM TASK ORDER 7 Estimated Staffing Plan and Cost Breakdown
Principal
Engineer
Associate
Engineer
Assistant
Engineer
Admin
Assistant
Assistant
Engineer
Senior
Engineer
Associate
Technician
Project
Admin
Senior
Technician Intern Licensed
Surveyor
1 man
survey
2 man
survey
Assistant
Surveyor
Assistant
Technician
Dorn_J Fox_A Hardy_T 1 man
survey
2 man
survey
Total
Hours Mileage Expenses Subtotal
Labor Total Fee
TASK $241.60 $163.75 $131.54 $62.41 $106.71 $186.57 $108.72 $80.53 $141.61 $56.37 $181.20 $259.27 $259.27 $107.38 $85.23 0.725 Phase SUR
1 Topo Survey & Verify ROW 120 4 8 48 24 24 228 1520 1,102.00 $36,860 $37,962 Phase MON
1 Office Prep, Research 6 6 - $850 $850
2 Pre-Con Field Work 6 10 3 3 22 190 137.75 $4,020 $4,158 3 Pre-Con Corner Record 16 3 3 22 - $2,844 $2,844
4 Post-Con Field Work 6 10 3 3 22 380 275.50 $4,020 $4,296 5 Post-Con Corner Record 16 3 3 22 - $2,844 $2,844
Phase GEO
1 Geotechnical Investigation 0 25,100.00 $0 $25,100
Phase UTL
1 GPR Existing Utilities 0 32,320.00 $0 $32,320
Phase DR
1 Review Existing Documents 4 6 10 - $1,444 $1,444
2 Site Visit 6 6 12 - $2,432 $2,432
3 Prepare Drainage Report 2 4 24 12 10 52 - $6,663 $6,663 Phase SD
1 Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 14 180 130.50 $1,949 $2,079 2 Drawing Set Up 4 16 20 - $2,792 $2,792
3 Utlity Research & Potholing 2 4 8 8 22 - $2,835 $2,835 4 Basemap Review, Coord, Set up 2 4 12 20 38 - $5,549 $5,549 5 Project Management 16 20 4 40 - $7,390 $7,390
7 35% Plans 16 30 40 120 50 20 20 296 - $36,241 $36,241 8 35% Design Review Meeting 8 8 8 24 180 130.50 $4,295 $4,426 9 Preliminary EOPCC 2 8 12 24 46 - $5,933 $5,933
12 Utility Relocation Letters & Exhibits 2 4 12 16 8 42 - $5,068 $5,068 Phase DD
1 65% Front End & Tech Specs 40 20 12 72 - $13,905 $13,905 2 65% Plans 16 40 80 240 80 80 12 60 608 - $75,254 $75,254 3 65% Design Review Meeting 8 8 8 24 180 130.50 $4,295 $4,426 4 Preliminary EOPCC 4 6 12 24 46 - $6,088 $6,088
5 Utility Relocation Letters & Exhibits 2 24 2 28 - $3,801 $3,801 Phase CD
1 95% Front End & Tech Specs 24 12 12 48 - $8,730 $8,730 2 95% Plans 16 40 80 180 40 40 396 - $46,750 $46,750
3 Preliminary EOPCC 4 6 12 24 46 - $6,088 $6,088
Phase FD
1 Final Front End & Tech Specs 16 12 12 40 - $6,797 $6,797 2 Final Plans 12 8 40 40 40 20 160 - $19,215 $19,215
3 Final EOPCC 4 6 12 24 46 - $6,088 $6,088
Phase BID
1 Bidding Assistance 8 16 16 40 - $6,657 $6,657
Phase CON
1 Construction Support 24 24 40 12 100 - $15,956 $15,956 2 Site Visits (x2) 12 12 24 360 261.00 $4,478 $4,739
3 Record Drawings 2 4 24 30 - $4,295 $4,295
Total units 250 296 488 4 706 80 222 68 240 140 4 8 68 36 36 2,646 2990 $59,588 Total $ $60,400 $48,470 $64,192 $250 $75,337 $14,926 $24,136 $5,476 $33,986 $7,892 $725 $2,074 $17,630 $3,866 $3,068 $59,588 $362,427 $422,387.49

Page 334 of 546 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
PAGE 1
Prime Consultant Subconsultant
Consultant:

Project No. Contract No. Date: 2/26/2026
Direct Labor
Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total
Principal Engineer Jeff Dorn 250 90.00$ 22,500.00$
Associate Engineer Annemarie Fox 296 61.00$ 18,056.00$
Assistant Engineer Thomas Hardy 488 49.00$ 23,912.00$
Administrative Assistant 4 23.25$ 93.00$
Assistant Engineer 706 39.75$ 28,063.50$
Senior Engineer 80 69.50$ 5,560.00$
Assistant Surveyor 36 40.00$ 1,440.00$
Assistant Technician 36 31.75$ 1,143.00$
Associate Technician 222 40.50$ 8,991.00$
Licensed Surveyor 4 67.50$ 270.00$
Project Administrator 68 30.00$ 2,040.00$
Senior Technician 240 52.75$ 12,660.00$
Intern 140 22.00$ 3,080.00$
1 Man Survey Crew 8 96.58$ 772.64$
2 Man Survey Crew 68 96.58$ 6,567.44$
2,646.0 135,148.58$

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs 135,148.58$
b) Anticipated Salary Increases -$
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a)+(b)] 135,148.58$

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate): 52.23% e) Total Fringe Benefits[(c) × (d)] 70,585.40$ f) Overhead (Rate): 64.09% g) Overhead [(c) × (f)] 86,611.32$ h) 27.73% i) Gen & Admin [(c) × (h)] 37,472.65$
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) +(g) + (i)] 194,669.37$

FIXED FEE
p) (Rate): 10.0% k) 32,981.79$
l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit(s) Unit Cost Total
2990 0.725 2,167.75$
32,320.00$
-$
-$
-$
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 34,487.75$
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: 25,100.00$
Subconsultant 2: -$
Subconsultant 3: -$
Subconsultant 4: -$
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT' COSTS 25,100.00$
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l)+(m)] 59,587.75$ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 422,387.49$
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. Total
General and Administrative (Rate):

TOTAL FIXED PROFIT [(c) + (j)] × (p)]
Classification/Title Name
Anticipated salary increases calculations (page 2) must accompany.

Key personnel must be marked with an asterick (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two astericks (**). All costs must comply with Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a congnizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

BSK Geotechnical Engineering Services
Description
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
2nd Tier Subconsultant
COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Mileage Costs
Utility Location Services
X
LPP 15-01 3/11/2026

Page 335 of 546 ends

Cost Proposal
Certification of Direct Costs:

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Title:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email: Phone Number:

Address:

List Services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Director of Operations
Jeffrey Dorn
03/11/2026
[email protected]
455 W. Fir Ave., Clovis, CA 93611
559-449-2700
Civil engineering design and land surveying services for the City of Turlock's Roads Program.

Page 336 of 546 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual
EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Prime Consultant
Consultant
Project No.

Contract No.

Date
2/25/2026

DIRECT LABOR
Hours
Total
5 417.70
$
11 519.86
$
14 410.48
$
4 121.08
$
8 412.48
$
4 309.36
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
2,233.98
$

79.05%
e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)]
138.12%
g) Overhead [(c) x (f)]

0.00%
i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)]
4,851.53
$

FIXED FEE
15%
1,062.83
$
Quantity
Unit
Total
400
mile
400.00
$
1 each
488.00
$
1 each

71.00 $
1 total
4,800.00
$
5,759.00
$
m)
SUBCONSULTANTS’ COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1:
2,300.00
$
Subconsultant 2:
3,900.00
$
Subconsultant 3:
-
$
Subconsultant 4:
-
$
Subconsultant 5:
-
$
Subconsultant 6:
-
$
Subconsultant 7:
-
$
Subconsultant 8:
-
$
6,200.00
$
11,959.00
$
20,107.34
$
NOTES:

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).

All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Subconsultant
2nd Tier Subconsultant
Group 3 Engineering Technician OT
Various

77.34 $
m)
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS’ COSTS
n)

TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS
[(l)+(m)]

TOTAL COST
[(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)]

29.32 $
Adminstrative Assistant
l)
CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Unit Cost

1.00 $
Description of Item
Trip Charge (Vehicle, Mileage, Bridge Toll)
Drilling supplies
Software charge
Laboratory Testing
488.00
$

71.00 $
4,800.00
$
l)

TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
MD Concrete Cutting and Demolition
Safety Network
d) Fringe Benefits Rate:
f) Overhead Rate:
h) General and Administrative Rate:

INDIRECT COSTS
1,765.96
$
3,085.57
$
-
$
j)

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS
[(e) + (g) + (i)]
k)

TOTAL FIXED FEE
[(c) + (j)] x fixed fee
c)

TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS
[(a) + (b)]
-
$
-
$

51.56 $
G26000068
2,190.96
$

43.02 $
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation)

LABOR COSTS
-
$
Name
Carrie Rodriguez
Administrator

30.27 $
Project Professional I
Tolleman Gorham

47.26 $
-
$
-
$
Staff Professional I
Arnoldo Bravo
-
$
-
$
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL

Page 1 of 3 ends

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE

OR LUMP SUM
(FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS
(DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
BSK Associates
Tuolumne Street Rehabilitation
Classification/Title
Principal
Actual Hourly Rate

83.54 $
-
$
Group 3 Engineering Technician
Various
C
h
C
h
C
h
January 2018

Page 337 of 546 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor
Subtotal per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal
Avg
Hourly Rate
5 Year
Contract
Duration
2,190.96$ 46 = 47.63$ Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 47.63$ + 3.00% = 49.06$ Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 49.06$ + 3.00% = 50.53$ Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 50.53$ + 3.00% = 52.05$ Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 52.05$ + 3.00% = 53.61$ Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed
Each Year
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 50.0% * 46 = 23 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 35.0% * 46 = 16.1 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 15.0% * 46 = 6.9 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.0% * 46 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.0% * 46 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100.0% Total = 46
Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
Estimated hours
(calculated above)
Cost per
Year
Year 1 47.63$ * 23 = 1,095.48$ Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 49.06$ * 16.1 = 789.84$ Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 50.53$ * 6.9 = 348.66$ Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 52.05$ * 0 = -$ Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 53.61$ * 0 = -$ Estimated Hours Year 5
= 2,233.98$
= 2,190.96$
= 43.02$ Transfer to Page 1
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
NOTES:

1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %)

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
January 2018

Page 338 of 546 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

Name: Title *:

Signature: 2/25/2026
Email:

Address: 399 Lindbergh Avenue, Livermore, CA 94551
*An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Geotechnical Engineering Services
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Chief Operating Officer
Phone Number: 925.315.3151
Tim Rodriguez
[email protected]
Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Terms and conditions of the contract
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3
Certification of Direct Costs:

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
January 2018

Page 339 of 546 ends

Page 1 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 8 for Task Order No. 8

AMENDMENT NO. 8 FOR TASK ORDER NO. 8
Under the Terms of the

MASTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TURLOCK
and
PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

DBA PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
for
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES (City Contract No. 2023-110)

City Project No. 26-016

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 8 for Task Order No. 8 under the terms of City Contract No. 2023-110 is entered into by and between the CITY OF TURLOCK, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. DBA PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP, a California corporation (“Professional”), on this ______ day of ___________ 2026 (the “ Effective Date of Task Order No. 8”). City and Professional may be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” or individually as “Party.” There are no other parties to this Amendment No. 8.

WHEREAS, City desires that Professional provide engineering design services for City Project No. 26-016 “Provost & Pritchard Task Order No. 8 for Roads Program CIP Projects;” and

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 8 for Task Order No. 8 provides the scope of services, associated fees, and schedule for said City Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Exhibit I, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby added to the Agreement.

2. Recital B of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

Page 340 of 546 ends

Page 2 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 8 for Task Order No. 8

B. Professional has made a proposal to City to provide such professional services. A description of the services Professional proposes to provide is included in the Scope of Services in Exhibits A through I attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Services”). City desires to retain Professional to perform the Services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

3. Recital C of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

4. Recital D of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

5. Section 5 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

5.1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Professional shall provide City the Services described in Exhibits A through I. Any request for Services not included in Exhibits A through I will be considered a request for additional or modified Services (“ Modification” or “ Modifications”). Professional shall not receive additional compensation for any Modification of the Services unless the Parties agree otherwise in a writing executed by both Parties.

5.2. City Requested Modification o f Services. City may, by written order, authorize Modifications to the Services described in Exhibits A through I. If such Modifications cause an increase in the cost or time required for performance of Professional’s Services, the Parties shall enter into a written amendment to this Agreement to adjust the Services and the compensation to be paid to Professional and, if necessary, amend the Completion Schedule or Compensation Schedule. The Services, Completion Schedule, or Compensation Schedule shall not b e revised unless City and Professional mutually agree to a written amendment to this Agreement reflecting such revisions, additional compensation, time for performance or such other terms or conditions mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

6. Section 6 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

Page 341 of 546 ends

Page 3 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 8 for Task Order No. 8

Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Professional will be allowed to include an amount for the anticipated salary increases as calculated per Exhibit 10-H1. City’s total compensation to Professional shall not exceed the cumulative amount resulting from each Task Order with each approved Amendment to the Agreement. The compensation for Amendment No. 8 shall not exceed Seven-Hundred-Seven Thousand Two-Hundred-Twenty Dollars and Seventy-Eight Cents ($707,220.78) for City Project No. 26-016 (“Maximum Payment”), unless the Parties mutually agree in writing otherwise.

8. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Term of the Agreement.

[Signatures on Following Page]

Page 342 of 546 ends

Page 4 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2023-110, Amendment No. 8 for Task Order No. 8

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment No. 8 to be executed by and through their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

PROFESSIONAL

PROVOST & PRITCHARD ENGINEERING
GROUP, INC. DBA PROVOST & PRITCHARD
CONSULTING GROUP, a California
corporation

By:

Jeffrey Dorn, Director of Operations

Date
CITY

City of Turlock, a California
municipal corporation

By:

Gary R. Hampton, Interim City Manager

Date:

APPROVED AS TO SUFFICIENCY:

By:

Christopher Fisher,
Municipal Services Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Katie O. Lucchesi, City Attorney

ATTEST:

By:

Nichole Fiez, City Clerk

4/13/2026

Page 343 of 546 ends

455 W Fir Ave Clovis, CA 93611 (559) 449-2700
www.provostandpritchard.com
Engineering Structural Geostructural Surveying Planning Environmental GIS Construction Services Hydrogeology Consulting Clovis Visalia Bakersfield Modesto Los Banos Chico Sacramento Sonora San Luis Obispo Boise, ID March 11, 2026
Fred Pezeshk
City of Turlock
156 South Broadway, Suite 150
Turlock, CA 95380
Subject: Engineering and Land Surveying Services for
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8
Dear Fred Pezeshk:

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide engineering and land surveying services for the City of Turlock’s Roads Program Task Order No. 8. This proposal discusses our understanding of the project, recommends a scope of services together with associated fees, deliverables, approximate schedules, sets forth our assumptions, and discusses other services that may be of interest as the project proceeds.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
We understand the City of Turlock would like to design the full reconstruction of multiple streets in the City of Turlock as listed in the tables below.

TASK ORDER No. 8 STREETS
Street Name From To Length
(ft.)
Temple Ave E. Tuolumne Rd Drexel Ave 770
Rutgers Ave Temple Ave Loyola Way 473
Duke Ct Temple Ave East End 190
Drexel Ave Temple Ave Loyola Way 410
Loyola Way Rutgers Ave North Ave 1,314
Baylor Ave Geer Rd Loyola Way 696
Loyola Way Annhurst Ave 257
Asbury Ct Baylor Ave South End 390
Clemson Ct Baylor Ave South End 390
Annhurst Ave E. Tuolumne Rd Hanover Ave 1,410
Vassar Ave Annhurst Ave N. Denair Ave 585
Hanover Ave Annhurst Ave N. Denair Ave 523
Xavier Ave Vassar Ave Hanover Ave 1,076
N. Denair Ave Vassar Ave North Ave 1,313
Piedmont Ave N. Denair Ave Rohrer Dr 282
Rohrer Dr Piedmont Ave North Ave 1,017

Page 344 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8 Page 2 of 8 Job No.: 20-557
TASK ORDER No. 8 STREETS
Street Name From To Length
(ft.)
Hilda Ct Rohrer Dr East End 150
Lori Ct Rohrer Dr East End 150
Kirkland Ct Rohrer Dr East End 150
Total Length 11,546
The total length of these street improvements is 11,546 linear feet and the construction is roughly expected to cost between approximately $4,700,000 and 6,700,000.

The street improvements for the rehabilitation plans will include pavement reconstruction (using full-depth reclamation with cement (FDR-C) or a conventional pavement section), removal and replacement of existing curb, gutter, and valley gutter as needed for drainage, and removal and replacement and/or construction of new sidewalk, curb ramps, drive approaches and alley approaches as required to meet current accessibility standards.

Provost and Pritchard will review approximately 33 locations within the project area to determine if there is a need for the removal and replacement of the existing curb ramp or construction of a new curb ramp to meet ADA requirements. Our team will also review the existing stormwater drainage facilities (inlets, pipes, and manholes) to determine recommendations for replacements required to improve stormwater drainage.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Our proposed scope of work for this proposal is segregated into several phases, described below.

PHASE SUR: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
Upon approval of the task order we will complete a field topographic survey and right of way verification for the segments of roadway described above.
 Capturing horizontal and vertical locations for top of curbs, gutter flow lines, pavement crowns, manhole covers, valve covers, utility covers, striping, and USA markings needed to design and prepare the proposed improvement plans.
 Verify existing right-of-way limits with record maps and physical street monuments and prepare a right-of-way basemap suitable for use in the design of the improvements.  As required by the design team, dip accessible sewer and storm drain facilities located within the project limits to determine the depth of cover over existing gravity lines.  From the survey data and utility information collected, we will prepare a base drawing in AutoCAD Civil 3D format for use throughout the design process.

Up to 15 days of survey crew time will be required to complete the topographic survey for the entire project and prepare existing basemaps.

DELIVERABLES
Electronic basemap will be submitted to the City.

Page 345 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8 Page 3 of 8 Job No.: 20-557
PHASE MON: PRE/POST-CONSTRUCTION RECORD OF SURVEY AND MONUMENT

PRESERVATION
The City has requested Provost & Pritchard conduct a monument preservation survey for the project area.

Provost & Pritchard will perform the following as part of this task:
 Research record monuments within project area.
 Field Survey to locate existing monuments.
 Set ties to allow for re-establishing any monument destroyed during construction  Post-construction field survey to locate all monuments that were existing pre-construction and replace any destroyed monuments
 File a post-construction corner record for all monuments that were reset It is assumed that the Contractor will construct monument wells per the City standard. P&P will set the monuments. Our budget includes replacing approximately 20 monuments.

PHASE GEO: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Provost & Pritchard will work with our subconsultant, BSK, to provide needed geotechnical information.

BSK’s drilling program will include a total of fifteen (15) cores/borings to 3 to 5 feet beneath the existing ground surface (bgs), or until auger refusal, in the roadway pavement. Pavement cores will be taken at each boring. We will measure the existing pavement section to within the nearest ½ inch and obtain bulk soil samples of the near surface soil at each location to analyze for new pavement design. We will backfill each boring hole with soil cuttings or base rock, and cap with asphalt cold patch or quick setting concrete tinted black. Testing is expected to include the following:
 Minus 200 Wash
 R-value testing
 Corrosion potential (pH, soluble sulfates, and soluble chlorides)  In-situ moisture content and Dry density
 Soil cement mix design
Based on the results of the field exploration and laboratory testing program, engineering analyses will be performed to evaluate site conditions and develop recommendations for site preparation procedures and engineering parameters for the proposed construction. Specifically, the report will incorporate the following items:
 Vicinity Map and Site Plan with boring locations
 Subsurface conditions, soil boring logs, depth to groundwater (if encountered)  Summary of laboratory test results
 Corrosion characteristics of on-site soils
 Recommendations for site preparation, and earthwork
 Requirements for imported fill materials
 Recommendations for site drainage
 Recommendations for construction observations and testing and excavation suitability

Page 346 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8 Page 4 of 8 Job No.: 20-557
 Recommendations for conventional pavement section with asphalt concrete and Class II aggregate base
 Core information: Asphalt concrete (AC) and aggregate base (AB) section thickness and thickness of other pavement materials encountered
 Recommendations for alternative pavement sections including recommendations for FDR-C, conventional pavement sections with the use of geogrid, and full-depth HMA.  The geotechnical report will be prepared under the supervision of, and signed by, a California Licensed Geotechnical Engineer.
 A City of Turlock encroachment permit will be secured prior to drilling and is anticipated to be provided without a fee. No other permits will be required.  Borings will require a lane closure and traffic control will be limited to flagging operations.

DELIVERABLES
Geotechnical report will be submitted to the City in PDF format.

DELIVERABLES
Summary of utility locating findings will be submitted to the City in PDF format.

PHASE DR: DRAINAGE STUDY
Provost and Pritchard will review available stormwater plats and record drawings provided by the City to develop an understanding of the existing drainage patterns and facilities. After mapping the existing facilities, we will analyze the drainage patterns based on existing conditions and identify any drainage or ponding issues. Provost and Pritchard will make recommendations to the City as to how to improve drainage within the project area. We will then meet with the City to review the existing facilities, identified drainage problems, and potential solutions. The selected solutions will be incorporated into the improvement plans.

DELIVERABLES
Plan view only stormwater exhibits will be submitted to the City in PDF format.

PHASE SD: SCHEMATIC DESIGN
35% PLANS AND ESTIMATE
 Upon approval of the task order, we will conduct utility research and identify potential conflicts with record utilities. The City has provided plats and record drawings for their utilities. The utility information collected will be shown on an existing basemap prepared for the project.  We will prepare a schematic design set of plans for the project. We anticipate that our 35% plan set will include the following sheets:
o Cover Sheet
o General Notes and Legend Sheet

Page 347 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8 Page 5 of 8 Job No.: 20-557
o Storm Drain Plan Sheets (1”=20’ Plan and Profile).
o Street Plan Sheets (1”=20’ plan and profile view)
o Curb Ramp Detail Sheets (1”=5’)
o Driveway Detail Sheets (1”=5’)
o Signing, Striping, and Pavement Marking Sheets (1”=40’ double plan view)  Prepare Preliminary Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (EOPCC)  Improvements will be entirely within existing right-of-way and no additional right-of-way (ROW) acquisition will be required. If improvements are required to extend outside of existing ROW, we will prepare a ROW acquisition exhibit and the City will acquire any required ROW and/or Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs).
 Prepare Utility Relocation notification letters and Utility Relocation Exhibits. Any required utility relocation design will be provided by the utility companies.

DELIVERABLES
The plans, EOPCC and Utility Relocation Exhibits (if needed) will be submitted to the City in PDF format only.

PHASE DD: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
65% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Based on input received from City staff through the Schematic Design Phase, the design team will commence with engineering design and preparation of the construction documents to the 65% level.

Our 65% submittal will include:
 65% Front End and Technical Specifications
 65% Construction Plans, expected to include:
o Cover sheet
o Legend / Abbreviation sheet
o General Notes sheet
o Storm Drain Plan Sheets (1”=20’ Plan and Profile).
o Street Plan sheets (1”=20’ plan and profile)
o Curb Ramp, Alley, and Drive Approach Detail sheets
o Typical Cross Section sheets
o Miscellaneous Detail sheets
o City Standard Detail sheets
o Traffic Control Plan Sheets (1”=40”)
o Signing, Striping, and Pavement Marking sheets (1”=40’ double plan view)  Revised Preliminary Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs.  Revised Utility Relocation Exhibits per Utility Company’s comments.

Page 348 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8 Page 6 of 8 Job No.: 20-557
We will attend an in person design review meeting with City staff to discuss our 65% construction documents.

DELIVERABLES
The 65% plans and EOPCC listed above will be submitted to the City in PDF format only. Specifications will be submitted to the City in PDF and Word format
PHASE CD: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
95% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
We will incorporate comments from the 65% plan review and feedback from City staff as we prepare our 95% construction documents.

Our 95% submittal will include:
 95% Construction Plans (expected plan set as noted above)  95% Specifications
 Engineer’s opinion of probable construction costs

FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
We will incorporate comments from the 95% plan review and feedback from City staff as we prepare our Final construction documents.

Our Final submittal will include:
 Final Construction Plans (expected plan set as noted above)  Final Specifications
 Engineer’s opinion of probable construction costs

DELIVERABLES
The plans and EOPCC listed above will be submitted to the City in PDF format only. Final project specifications will be submitted to the City in PDF and Word format.

PHASE CON: ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
P&P will perform the following services to assist the City during the construction phase of the project:
 Attend pre-construction conference
 Assist City with review of shop drawings and submittals  Provide interpretation and clarification of construction documents during construction in response to requests for information from the contractor
 Assist City with review and provide technical information for construction contract change order requests if necessary

Page 349 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8 Page 7 of 8 Job No.: 20-557
 Conduct up to two site visits at intervals appropriate to the state of construction  Prepare record drawings based on contractor’s as-built drawings.

ASSUMPTIONS

1. All scribed paint markings associated with requesting Underground Service Alert would not be required to be removed.

2. The City has prepared or will prepare all necessary environmental documents and will provide all identified mitigation measures.

3. The City will pay all permit fees, if required.

4. Provost & Pritchard CAD standards and title block will be used for the design of this project. Provost & Pritchard’s current CAD version will be used.

PROPOSED FEE – TO 8: GEER-TUOLUMNE-OLIVE-HAWKEYE

PHASE ESTIMATED FEE

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Phase SUR – Topographic Survey $62,088
Phase MON – Monument Preservation $17,542
Phase GEO – Geotechnical Investigation $36,800
Phase UTL- Utility locating $50,000
Phase DR – Drainage Study $21,539
Phase SD – Schematic Design $180,067
SUBTOTAL = $368,036

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Phase DD – 65% PS&E $157,663
SUBTOTAL= $157,663

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Phase CD – 95% PS&E $92,891
Phase FD – 100% PS&E $44,235
SUBTOTAL = $137,126

BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION
Phase BID – Bid Support $9,261
Phase CON – Construction Support $35,140
SUBTOTAL = $44,402
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE= $707,220.78

Page 350 of 546 ends

City of Turlock March 11, 2026
City of Turlock Roads Program Task Order No. 8 Page 8 of 8 Job No.: 20-557
The line items shown above are estimates and are not intended to limit billings for any given Task. Required task effort may vary up or down from the line-item estimates shown, however total billings will not exceed the Total shown without additional authorization. If the scope changes materially from that described above, as a result of any agency’s decision or because of design changes requested by the City, we will prepare a revised estimate of our fees for your approval before we proceed.

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look forward to working with the City of Turlock on Task Order No. 8.

Sincerely Yours,
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Jeff S Dorn
RCE 76749, TE 2945
Director of Operations

Page 351 of 546 ends

BAYLOR AVEASBURY CT

CLEMSON CT

GEER RD

E TUOLUMNE RD

N OLIVE AVE

KIRKLAND CT

LORI CT

HILDA CTROHRER DR

NORTH AVE

N DENAIR AVE

XAVIER AVE

ANNHURST AVE

HANOVER AVE

VASSAR AVEDUKE CTRUTGERS AVE

DREXEL AVE

LOYOLA WAY

PIEDMONT AVE

TEMPLE AVE

SYMONS LN

THEO AVE
050100200SCALE IN FEET
DATE:OFDESIGN ENGINEER:JOB NO:TO 8: GEER-TUOLUMNE-OLIVE-HAWKEYECITY OF TURLOCKSTANISLAUS COUNTYPROJECT MAPJSDFEB. 202625-91211 3/9/2026 10:21 AM \\EgnyteDrive\Docs\Marketing\Proposals\2025\City of Turlock - Neighborhood Block 1 25-912\Background docs\Graphics and Images\CAD - PROJECT MAP\NEIGHBORGOOD BLOCK 1 PROJECT MAP.dwg -Jason Staicer www.provostandpritchard.com

LEGEND FULL RECONSTRUCTIONNEW CURB RAMPEXISTING NEWLY CONSTRUCTED OR PLANNED CURB RAMP

Page 352 of 546 ends

As of: 2/27/2026
Task Begin End
Duration
(Weeks)
Duration
(Cal Days)
Phase SUR - Topographic Survey 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28
Phase MON - Record of Survey & Monument Pres. 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28 Phase GEO - Geotechnical Investigation 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28 Phase UTIL - Utility Locating 5/11/26 6/22/26 6 42
Phase DR - Drainage Study 6/8/26 7/6/26 4 28
Phase SD - 35% PS&E 6/22/26 8/17/26 8 56
City Review - 35% PS&E 8/17/26 8/31/26 2 14
Phase DD - 65% Design Development 8/31/26 11/9/26 10 70 City Review - 65% Design Development 11/9/26 11/23/26 2 14 Phase CD - 95% PS&E 11/23/26 1/18/27 8 56
City Review - 95% Construction Documents 1/18/27 2/8/27 3 21 Phase FD - 100% PS&E 2/8/27 3/8/27 4 28
5/4
5/11
5/18
5/25
6/1
6/8
6/15
6/22
6/29
7/6
7/13
7/20
7/27
8/3
8/10
8/17
8/24
8/31
9/7
9/14
9/21
9/28
10/5
10/12
10/19
10/26
11/2
11/9
11/16
11/23
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
12/28
1/4
1/11
1/18
1/25
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
3/1
3/8
3/15
3/22
3/29
Phase SUR - Topographic Survey
Phase MON - Record of Survey & Monument…
Phase GEO - Geotechnical Investigation
Phase UTIL - Utility Locating
Phase DR - Drainage Study
Phase SD - 35% PS&E
City Review - 35% PS&E
Phase DD - 65% Design Development
City Review - 65% Design Development
Phase CD - 95% PS&E
City Review - 95% Construction Documents
Phase FD - 100% PS&E
Tentative Project Schedule-
Task Order No. 8: Geer-Tuolumne-Olive-Hawkeye Block
Deliverable
\\EgnyteDrive\Docs\Marketing\Proposals\2025\City of Turlock - Neighborhood Block 1 25-912\Working Drafts\Neighborhood Block 1 fee estimate.xlsx Page 1 of 1 Task Begin End
Duration
(Weeks)
Duration
(Cal Days)
Phase SUR - Topographic Survey 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28
Phase MON - Record of Survey & Monument Pres. 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28 Phase GEO - Geotechnical Investigation 5/11/26 6/8/26 4 28 Phase UTIL - Utility Locating 5/11/26 6/22/26 6 42
Phase DR - Drainage Study 6/8/26 7/6/26 4 28
Phase SD - 35% PS&E 6/22/26 8/17/26 8 56
City Review - 35% PS&E 8/17/26 8/31/26 2 14
Phase DD - 65% Design Development 8/31/26 11/9/26 10 70 City Review - 65% Design Development 11/9/26 11/23/26 2 14 Phase CD - 95% PS&E 11/23/26 1/18/27 8 56
City Review - 95% Construction Documents 1/18/27 2/8/27 3 21 Phase FD - 100% PS&E 2/8/27 3/8/27 4 28

Page 353 of 546 ends

JEFFREY DORN, PE, TE, QSD
Project Manager
MICHAEL OSBORN, PE, CASp, LEED-AP
QA/QC

JEFFREY DORN, PE, TE, QSD

PROJECT MANAGER
Jeffrey Dorn is a senior engineer at Provost & Pritchard with 15 years of civil engineering and project management experience.

His experience has been focused on transportation infrastructure design and providing ongoing consulting services for various public agencies. Mr . Dorn’s design experience includes geometric, pavement section, grading and drainage design of roads, design of ADA-accessible sidewalks and curb ramps, bike/pedestrian trail design, utility relocation, and water, sewer, and storm water system repair and replacement. Mr . Dorn has provided a wide variety of funding assistance for various cities and counties, including grant application assistance, conceptual project layouts, engineer’s estimates, and completing various LAPM forms authorizing right of way and construction. His experience also includes engineering report writing, front end and technical specifications, cost estimating, project management, and coordination with railroads, Caltrans, other public agencies and utility companies.

MICHAEL OSBORN, PE, LEED-AP

JASON STAICER, PE

LEAD ENGINEER
Jason Staicer is an Associate Engineer with Provost & Pritchard. With over eight years of professional experience, he has been primarily focused on municipal engineering, with successful projects involving roadway design, pavement management, road widening, storm and wastewater collection, utility coordination, and accessibility considerations. He is also experienced with commercial land development, hydrology and hydraulics studies, and subdivision design.

NICK CARCHA, EIT

PROJECT DESIGNER
Nikolaus Carcha has more than ten years of professional experience, currently serving as Assistant Engineer . In his role as Project Manager, he provides leadership in roadway design, grading and drainage design, ADA compliance, traffic signal design, and engineering calculations. He is also responsible for design drafting, exhibit preparation, and cost estimating on transportation planning, roadway, and roundabout improvement projects. Nick works directly on these projects at a high level and guides his team to deliver successful public infrastructure improvements.

BRYAN BOWERS, PLS

SURVEYOR
Bryan Bowers is a land surveyor at Provost & Pritchard with over 18 years of experience in the surveying field. He has been involved with the supervision, planning, and execution of geodetic and conventional control surveys, topographic surveys, subdivision mapping, boundary surveys, subsidence monitoring, UAV observation surveys, ALTA surveys, boundary analysis/legal descriptions and construction staking.

CARRIE L. RODRIGUEZ, PE, GE

JASON STAICER, PE
Lead Engineer

NICK CARCHA, EIT
Project Designer

BRYAN BOWERS, PLS
Surveyor
NEVA M. POPENOE, PE, GE
Geotechnical (BSK)
Roads Program - Task Order No. 8

KEY STAFF

Page 354 of 546 ends

691 N Laverne Avenue , Suite 101
Fresno, CA 9 3727
P 559.497.2880
www.bskassociates.com

Environmental, Geotechnical, Construction Services, Analytical Testing - An Employee-Owned Company

Sent via email: [email protected]

February 11, 2026 BSK Proposal G26000122

Jason Staicer, PE
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
455 W Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93611

SUBJECT: Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Street Rehabilitation
Various Streets
Turlock, California

Dear Mr. Staicer:

At your request, BSK Associates is pleased to s ubmit this proposal for the preparation of a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Report for the proposed roadway improvements in Turlock, California . Our current understanding of the project, scope of services, schedules, fees and assumptions for our services are provided below. We understand the project will be subject to prevailing wage s as determined by California Director of Industrial Relations (DIR).

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND BACKGROUND

Based on email correspondence from you on February 2, 2026, BSK understands that the project will encompass improvements along the roadways shown in the table below . The improvements are anticipated to include new pavement, repair or remove/replace curb, gutter and sidewalk, ADA ramps, driveway, and drainage improvements.

Street Location Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2
Temple Avenue E Tuolumne Road Drexel Avenue
Rutgers Avenue Temple Avenue Loyola Way
Duke Court Temple Avenue N/A
Drexel Avenue Temple Avenue Loyola Way
Loyola Way Rutgers Avenue North Avenue

Page 355 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000122 Street Rehabilitation – Various Streets February 11, 2026 Turlock, California Page 2

Baylor Avenue Geer Road Annhurst Avenue
Asbury Court Baylor Avenue N/A
Clemson Court Baylor Avenue N/A
Annhurst Avenue E Tuolumne Road Hanover Avenue
Xavier Avenue Vassar Avenue Hanover Avenue
Vassar Avenue Annhurst Avenue Piedmont Avenue
N Denair Avenue Piedmont Avenue North Avenue
Piedmont Avenue Vassar Avenue Hilda Court
Rohrer Drive Hilda Court North Avenue
Hilda Court Rohrer Drive N/A
Lori Court Rohrer Drive N/A
Kirkland Court Rohrer Drive N/A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

The objective of the geotechnical investigation is to assess soil conditions and to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for use by the project designers in preparation of the plans and specifications for the project. Based upon the above project understanding, BSK proposes the following scope of services, which will generally include a field exploration, laboratory testing program, engineering analyses, and report preparation.

Field Exploration

Our proposed drilling program will include a total of fifteen (15) cores/borings to 3 to 5 feet beneath the existing ground surface (bgs) , or until auger refusal, in the roadway pavement. Pavement cores will be taken at each boring. We will measure the existing pavement section to within the nearest ½ inch and obtain bulk soil samples of the near surface soil at each location to analyze for new pavement design.

We will backfill each boring hole with soil cuttings or base rock, and cap with asphalt cold patch or quick setting concrete tinted black.

Page 356 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000122 Street Rehabilitation – Various Streets February 11, 2026 Turlock, California Page 3

Test borings will be drilled using a diamond bit core barrel, and manually operated auger equipment.

The sampling of bulk and intact soil specimens for purposes of laboratory testing, and visually classifying soils exposed during the drilling process will be provided by a BSK Geologist or Engineer.

If requested, BSK may subcontract a private utility locator for an additional fee.

An e ncroachment permit with the City of Turlock will be secured prior to drilling. Permit fees are anticipated to be waived. It is understood no other permits will be required.

It is anticipated borings will require a lane closure, and traffic control will be provided by a subcontractor, including general traffic control plans.

Laboratory Testing

Geotechnical Analysis and Report Preparation

• Vicinity Map and Site Plan with boring locations
• Subsurface conditions, soil boring logs, depth to groundwater (if encountered)

Page 357 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000122 Street Rehabilitation – Various Streets February 11, 2026 Turlock, California Page 4

• Summary of laboratory test results
• Corrosion characteristics of on-site soils
• Recommendations for site preparation, and earthwork
• Requirements for imported fill materials
• Recommendations for site drainage
• Recommendations for construction observations and testing and excavation suitability • Recommendations for conventional pavement section with asphalt concrete and Class II aggregate base
• Core information: AC and AB section thickness and thickness of other pavement materials encountered
• Recommendations for alternative pavement sections including recommendations for full-depth reclamation with cement (FDR-C), conventional pavement sections with the use of geogrid, and full-depth HMA.

The geotechnical report will be prepared under the supervision of, and signed by, a California Licensed Geotechnical Engineer.

SCHEDULE

Work on this project will begin immediately , upon receipt of your authorization to proceed , with submittal of permit applications (as applicable), preparation of a Work Plan and field marking of our borehole locations for USA. We anticipate mobilizing for our geotechnical investigation within two (2) weeks of receiving notice to proceed, pending site access, encroachment permits, weather conditions and pavement coring subcontractor availability. We anticipate that drilling will be completed within two (2) working days and our laboratory testing program to be completed within three (3) weeks following completion of our field work. Our written report will be submitted within two (2) weeks following the completion of our laboratory testing program. Preliminary design recommendations may be provided prior to finalizing the report, as requested.

Page 358 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000122 Street Rehabilitation – Various Streets February 11, 2026 Turlock, California Page 5

FEES

Fees for our services will be charged on a Time and Materials basis. Our fee will be invoiced monthly.

For the scope of services outlined in this proposal, our fee, approximately broken down by task, will be as follows:

Estimated Fee
Site Reconnaissance, Encroachment Permit Application,
Marking for USA $ 2,800
Field Exploration (includes 15 borings) $17,600
Laboratory Testing
(Includes one (1) FDR and three (3) R-Values) $ 7,300
Engineering Analysis and Draft Report Preparation $ 3,100 Final Report Preparation $ 1,000
Estimated Fee $31,800
Optional: Private Utility Locator
Initial here if desired: _________ $ 3,000
Plan Review or Post Report Consultation
Initial here if desired: _________ $ 2,000
Our fee applies to work commenced within 60 days of this proposal. The fees presented in this proposal are based on prompt payment for services presented in our standard invoicing format. Additional charges will be applied for specializing invoicing if backup documentation is needed. These special services will be charged on a time and expenses basis. Late fees will be charged if payment is not received in accordance with terms contained in our contract.

PROPOSAL ASSUMPTIONS

Page 359 of 546 ends

Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Investigation BSK Proposal G26000122 Street Rehabilitation – Various Streets February 11, 2026 Turlock, California Page 6

• Excess soil cuttings will be removed from the site.
• Prevailing wages apply. DIR Project ID will be provided prior to start of work. • Encroachment permits will be provided at no fee.
• Project meetings/conference calls, plan reviews , response to Agency review comments and construction services are not included in our estimate, but can be provided on request on a “time and materials” basis.
• BSK will retain soil samples for a maximum of sixty (60) days.

Please contact us immediately if you are aware of any inaccuracies in these assumptions and conditions, so we may revise the proposal or fee.

GENERAL CONDITIONS AND AGREEMENT

CLOSING

Respectfully submitted,
BSK Associates

Tolleman Gorham, PE Carrie Rodriguez, PE, GE
Project Engineer I Geotechnical Group Manager
CE 96089 GE 3016

Page 360 of 546 ends

PROPOSAL FOR CITY OF TURLOCK ROADS PROGRAM TASK ORDER 8 Estimated Staffing Plan and Cost Breakdown
Principal
Engineer
Senior
Engineer
Assistant
Engineer
Associate
Engineer
Assistant
Engineer
Associate
Technician
Senior
Technician
Project
Admin
Admin
Assistant
Licensed
Surveyor
Assistant
Surveyor
Assistant
Technician Intern 1 man
survey
2 man
survey
Dorn_J Staicer_J Hardy_T 1 man
survey
2 man
survey
Total
Hours Mileage Expenses Subtotal
Labor Total Fee
TASK $241.60 $186.57 $131.54 $163.75 $106.71 $108.72 $141.61 $80.53 $62.41 $181.20 $107.38 $85.23 $59.06 $259.27 $259.27 0.725 Phase SUR
1 Topo Survey & Verify ROW 60 4 64 64 8 140 340 2990 2,167.75 $59,920 $62,088 Phase MON
1 Office Prep, Research 8 3 3 14 - $1,711 $1,711
2 Pre-Con Field Work 6 3 3 12 24 230 166.75 $4,539 $4,705 3 Pre-Con Corner Record 16 3 3 22 - $2,844 $2,844
4 Post-Con Field Work 6 3 3 12 24 460 333.50 $4,539 $4,872 5 Post-Con Corner Record 20 3 3 26 - $3,410 $3,410
Phase GEO
1 Geotechnical Investigation 0 36,800.00 $0 $36,800
Phase UTL
1 GPR Existing Utilities 0 50,000.00 $0 $50,000
Phase DR
1 Review Existing Documents 12 14 26 - $3,733 $3,733
2 Site Visit 6 6 12 - $2,569 $2,569
3 Prepare Drainage Report 6 12 96 12 126 - $15,237 $15,237 Phase SD
1 Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 14 180 130.50 $1,995 $2,125 2 Drawing Set Up 4 16 16 36 - $4,499 $4,499
3 Utlity Research 2 4 8 8 22 - $2,926 $2,926
4 Basemap Review, Coord, Set up 2 4 12 20 20 58 - $7,774 $7,774 5 Project Management 32 40 4 76 - $15,444 $15,444
7 35% Plans 40 60 120 214 240 240 40 40 994 - $131,416 $131,416 8 35% Design Review Meeting 8 8 8 24 180 130.50 $4,478 $4,608 9 Preliminary EOPCC 2 8 12 24 46 - $6,115 $6,115
12 Utility Relocation Letters & Exhibits 2 4 12 16 8 42 - $5,160 $5,160 Phase DD
1 65% Front End & Tech Specs 40 20 12 72 - $14,362 $14,362 2 65% Plans 40 80 120 160 240 240 40 80 1,000 - $128,667 $128,667 3 65% Design Review Meeting 8 8 8 24 180 130.50 $4,478 $4,608 4 Preliminary EOPCC 4 6 12 24 46 - $6,225 $6,225
5 Utility Relocation Letters & Exhibits 2 24 2 28 - $3,801 $3,801 Phase CD
1 95% Front End & Tech Specs 24 12 12 48 - $9,004 $9,004 2 95% Plans 40 60 120 240 120 40 620 - $77,662 $77,662
3 Preliminary EOPCC 4 6 12 24 46 - $6,225 $6,225
Phase FD
1 Final Front End & Tech Specs 16 12 12 40 - $7,071 $7,071 2 Final Plans 20 30 40 80 40 40 250 - $30,939 $30,939
3 Final EOPCC 4 6 12 24 46 - $6,225 $6,225
Phase BID
1 Bidding Assistance 12 20 20 52 - $9,261 $9,261
Phase CON
1 Construction Support 24 60 40 20 12 156 - $25,355 $25,355 2 Site Visits (x2) 12 12 24 360 261.00 $5,138 $5,399
3 Record Drawings 2 4 24 30 - $4,386 $4,386
Total units 354 496 610 374 1080 654 234 68 4 4 79 79 200 8 164 4,408 4580 $90,121 Total $ $85,526 $92,539 $80,239 $61,243 $115,247 $71,103 $33,137 $5,476 $250 $725 $8,483 $6,733 $11,812 $2,074 $42,520 $90,121 $617,107 $707,220.78

Page 361 of 546 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
PAGE 1
Prime Consultant Subconsultant
Consultant:

Project No. Contract No. Date: 2/26/2026
Direct Labor
Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total
Principal Engineer Jeff Dorn 354 90.00$ 31,860.00$
Senior Engineer Jason Stacier 496 69.50$ 34,472.00$
Assistant Engineer Thomas Hardy 610 49.00$ 29,890.00$
Associate Engineer 374 61.00$ 22,814.00$
Assistant Engineer 1080 39.75$ 42,930.00$
Associate Technician 654 40.50$ 26,487.00$
Senior Technician 234 52.75$ 12,343.50$
Project Administrator 68 30.00$ 2,040.00$
Administrator Assistant 4 23.25$ 93.00$
Licensed Surveyor 4 67.50$ 270.00$
Assistant Surveyor 79 40.00$ 3,160.00$
Assistant Technician 79 31.75$ 2,508.25$
Intern 200 22.00$ 4,400.00$
1 Man Survey Crew 8 96.58$ 772.64$
2 Man Survey Crew 164 96.58$ 15,839.12$
4,408.0 229,879.51$

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs 229,879.51$
b) Anticipated Salary Increases -$
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a)+(b)] 229,879.51$

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate): 52.23% e) Total Fringe Benefits[(c) × (d)] 120,061.47$ f) Overhead (Rate): 64.09% g) Overhead [(c) × (f)] 147,320.58$ h) 27.73% i) Gen & Admin [(c) × (h)] 63,738.69$
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) +(g) + (i)] 331,120.74$

FIXED FEE
p) (Rate): 10.0% k) 56,100.03$
l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit(s) Unit Cost Total
4580 0.725 3,320.50$
50,000.00$
-$
-$
-$
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 53,320.50$
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: 36,800.00$
Subconsultant 2: -$
Subconsultant 3: -$
Subconsultant 4: -$
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT' COSTS 36,800.00$
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l)+(m)] 90,120.50$ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 707,220.78$
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. Total
General and Administrative (Rate):

TOTAL FIXED PROFIT [(c) + (j)] × (p)]
Classification/Title Name
Anticipated salary increases calculations (page 2) must accompany.

BSK Geotechnical Engineering Services
Description
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
2nd Tier Subconsultant
COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Mileage Costs
Utility Location Services
X
LPP 15-01 3/11/2026

Page 362 of 546 ends

Cost Proposal
Certification of Direct Costs:

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Title:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email: Phone Number:

Address:

List Services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

Page 363 of 546 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual
EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Prime Consultant
Consultant
Project No.

Contract No.

Date
2/25/2026

DIRECT LABOR
Hours
Total
6 501.24
$
14 661.64
$
18 527.76
$
5 151.35
$
16 824.96
$
5 386.70
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
3,113.61
$

79.05%
e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)]
138.12%
g) Overhead [(c) x (f)]

0.00%
i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)]
6,761.82
$

FIXED FEE
15%
1,481.31
$
Quantity
Unit
Total
600
mile
600.00
$
1 each
488.00
$
1 each

71.00 $
1 total
7,300.00
$
8,459.00
$
m)
SUBCONSULTANTS’ COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1:
4,600.00
$
Subconsultant 2:
7,360.00
$
Subconsultant 3:
-
$
Subconsultant 4:
-
$
Subconsultant 5:
-
$
Subconsultant 6:
-
$
Subconsultant 7:
-
$
Subconsultant 8:
-
$
11,960.00
$
20,419.00
$
31,775.75
$
NOTES:

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).

All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Subconsultant
2nd Tier Subconsultant
Group 3 Engineering Technician OT
Various

77.34 $
m)
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS’ COSTS
n)

TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS
[(l)+(m)]

TOTAL COST
[(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)]

29.32 $
Adminstrative Assistant
l)
CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Unit Cost

1.00 $
Description of Item
Trip Charge (Vehicle, Mileage, Bridge Toll)
Drilling supplies
Software charge
Laboratory Testing
488.00
$

71.00 $
7,300.00
$
l)

TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
MD Concrete Cutting and Demolition
Safety Network
d) Fringe Benefits Rate:
f) Overhead Rate:
h) General and Administrative Rate:

INDIRECT COSTS
2,461.31
$
4,300.52
$
-
$
j)

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS
[(e) + (g) + (i)]
k)

TOTAL FIXED FEE
[(c) + (j)] x fixed fee
c)

TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS
[(a) + (b)]
-
$
-
$

51.56 $
G26000122
3,053.65
$

59.96 $
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation)

LABOR COSTS
-
$
Name
Carrie Rodriguez
Administrator

30.27 $
Project Professional I
Tolleman Gorham

47.26 $
-
$
-
$
Staff Professional I
Arnoldo Bravo
-
$
-
$
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL

Page 1 of 3 ends

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE

OR LUMP SUM
(FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS
(DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
BSK Associates
Turlock Neighborhood Block Street Rehabilitation
Classification/Title
Principal
Actual Hourly Rate

83.54 $
-
$
Group 3 Engineering Technician
Various
C
h
C
h
C
h
January 2018

Page 364 of 546 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Direct Labor
Subtotal per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal
Avg
Hourly Rate
5 Year
Contract
Duration
3,053.65$ 64 = 47.71$ Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 47.71$ + 3.00% = 49.14$ Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 49.14$ + 3.00% = 50.62$ Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 50.62$ + 3.00% = 52.14$ Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 52.14$ + 3.00% = 53.70$ Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed
Each Year
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 50.0% * 64 = 32 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 35.0% * 64 = 22.4 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 15.0% * 64 = 9.6 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.0% * 64 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.0% * 64 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100.0% Total = 64
Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
Estimated hours
(calculated above)
Cost per
Year
Year 1 47.71$ * 32 = 1,526.83$ Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 49.14$ * 22.4 = 1,100.84$ Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 50.62$ * 9.6 = 485.94$ Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 52.14$ * 0 = -$ Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 53.70$ * 0 = -$ Estimated Hours Year 5
= 3,113.61$
= 3,053.65$
= 59.96$ Transfer to Page 1
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
NOTES: