Agenda packet — Ukiah City Council, May 15, 2024 (part 4 of 7)

Commission (Major Use Permits). Staff will prepare a staff report for the project and make a recommendation to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the project. In order to approve a Use Permit, the project must be consistent with the findings required for approval (Ukiah City Code Section 9262(E)).

Application Procedure: Applications for a Use Permit are required to include: a completed and signed Planning Permit Application form; the submittal requirements identified on the application form; and the required fee. Applications are submitted to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, and projects are reviewed by City staff for consistency with the General Plan, compliance with zoning ordinance requirements, and to ensure that the use would be compatible with surrounding land uses and would not be detrimental to the public, health safety or welfare (considerations may include noise, odors, traffic, parking, and light and glare).

Referral: Once the application is deemed complete by City planning staff, the project will be referred to City Divisions and Departments (such as Building Division, Public Works Department, Fire Department, Police Department, and Electric Utility Department) for review and comment. Projects are also sent to outside agencies that may have review or permitting authority over the Project (such as Mendocino County Air Quality Management District, Regional Water, Environmental Health, Caltrans, Alcohol Beverage Control).

Environmental Review: As part of reviewing the project, the planner assigned to the project will determine if environmental review is required. Minor projects may be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Larger projects may not be exempt from CEQA and may be required to provide additional information needed to complete the required environmental review (such as a traffic study, noise study, lighting plan).

Public Hearing: After the project has been reviewed by the City and outside agencies and environmental review has been completed, the project will be scheduled for a public hearing for review of the project by the decision maker. This includes publishing a public notice in the newspaper, posting notice on the project site, and mailing a public notice to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.

5. DETERMINATIONS OF APPROPRIATE USE
Definition (UCC, Chapter 2 Zoning, as listed in various zoning districts): Whenever a use is not listed in the Zoning District as a use permitted by right or a use subject to a use permit, the Planning (Community Development) Director “shall determine whether the use is appropriate for the Zoning District, either as a right or subject to a use permit.” Description: In each of the City’s zoning districts, there are a list of uses permitted “by right,” meaning with no further discretionary review, and a list of uses that require a permit approved by a discretionary review body. Discretionary review bodies are quasi-judicial reviewing bodies, primarily the Zoning Administrator and the Planning Commission, that require a public hearing process and public review prior to their issuing of a decision on the proposed use.

In cases where the use is not listed in the zoning code, either by-right or via permit, a Determination of Appropriate Use enables an applicant to receive a determination as to if the proposed use is appropriate as a by-right and/or permitted use in that zoning district. This application type has the potential of granting flexibility, especially as new use types are proposed that do not exactly conform to the existing zoning code.

Page 412 of 750 ends

Application Procedure: Applicants are required to submit an application, providing a detailed project description, and paying the requisite application fee. Upon review, the Director will be required to make the following findings to allow the use by-right or with a permit:

A. That the use would not be incompatible with other existing or allowed uses in the PF Zoning District.

B. That the use would not be detrimental to the continuing development of the area in which the use would be located.

C. In the case of determining that a use not articulated as an allowed or permitted use could be established with the securing of a use permit, the Planning Director shall find that the proposed use is similar in nature and intensity to the uses listed as permitted uses. All determinations of the Planning Director regarding whether a use can be allowed or permitted in the Zoning District shall be final unless a written appeal to the City Council, stating the reasons for the appeal, and the appeal fee, if any, established from time to time by City Council resolution, is filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the date the decision was made. Appeals may be filed by an applicant or any interested party. The City Council shall conduct a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal in accordance to the applicable procedures as set forth in this Chapter. At the close of the public hearing, the City Council may affirm, reverse, revise or modify the appealed decision of the Planning Director. All City Council decisions on appeals of the Planning Director’s actions are final for the City. (Ord. 1009, §1, adopted 1998)

6. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS INCLUDING REZONES
Description: General plan amendments are undertaken to change the General Plan maps or text. Per State law, each mandatory General Plan element may be amended no more than four times per year. As of 2024, according to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the mandatory elements include Land Use, Housing, Circulation, Open Space, Conservation, Noise, and Safety. Cities and counties that have identified disadvantaged communities must also address environmental justice in their general plans, including air quality.

Application Procedure: Complete a planning permit application, paying the requisite fee at time of application submittal. At the minimum, applications for general plan amendments should include:
• Detailed project description- who, what, when, where, why. o A proposed land use change should be compatible with the surrounding uses and provide a logical progression for the City's development. Applications for “spot zoning” will be denied.
o Applicants for general plan amendments are advised to discuss their plans with neighboring property owners.
• CEQA environmental assessment. Please reach out to planning staff prior to submittal to determine the environmental review needed.

All general plan amendments are subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission, requiring at least one public hearing.

Page 413 of 750 ends

7. GENERAL PLAN/ADVANCE PLANNING MAINTENANCE FEE
Description: This fee is assessed by the Community Development Department on all new building permits. Fees collected in this account pay for future advance planning activities, including but not limited to, General Plan and associated element updates and amendments, specific plans, and zoning code amendments.

8. MURAL PERMITS
Description: Murals, both on private property and as public art on public property, are regulated through the City’s Public Art Policy and Sign Code. Per UCC Section 3226, Murals are allowed subject to review by the planning commission as a regular agenda item. Criteria upon which murals will be evaluated as both art and advertising are: compatibility with surrounding environment and community in general; appropriateness to site; relationship to use of building upon which it is placed; impact on motorists and traffic hazards; advertising potential. Written messages are discouraged. Any area determined to be advertising and allowed to remain in the mural shall be counted as part of the allowed parcel signage.

Application Procedure: Review the City’s Art Policy to ensure the proposed mural will be in conformance with regulations. Complete a planning permit application, paying the requisite fee at time of application submittal. At the minimum, applications for mural permits should include:
• Detailed project description, including the name of the artist and vision for the mural. • Artist rendering(s) or other visual depictions of proposed mural.

Once deemed complete by the planner, all applications for murals are to be reviewed by the Design Review Board, an advisory board, for possible recommendation to the Planning Commission. Both the Design Review Board meeting and Planning Commission meeting are public hearings subject to Brown Act and public review.

9. OUTDOOR DINING PERMIT
Description: On-site outdoor dining may be allowed in the C-N, C-1 and C-2 zoning districts, provided it is incidental to and part of the operation of a restaurant located on the same parcel, and it complies with the standards and requirements within UCC Section 9173.4.

Application Procedure: Complete a planning permit application, paying the requisite fee at time of application submittal. Applications for outdoor dining permits may also require submittal of proof of insurance, an encroachment permit, and other requirements.

10. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW AND PLANNING STAFF ZONING RESEARCH Applicants desiring pre-application review, including City staff research into Ukiah City Code and zoning code requirements, can contact the planning division of the Community Development Department to undertake this review. Up to one hour’s worth of one staff member’s time per project is provided at no cost to each applicant for this service, deemed a “Level 1 Review.” Additional research and/or review conducted by City planning staff beyond one hour’s worth of time in the pre-application phase requires submittal of a planning permit application, payment of a deposit per the City’s Fee Schedule, and will be subject to full cost recovery.

Page 414 of 750 ends

Pre-application reviews can also be undertaken by the Planning Commission and/or the Project Review Committee. For details on this process, contact the Planning Division.

11. PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
Purpose: Per UCC Section 9165, the purpose of the planned development combining zone is to allow flexibility in design and development in order to promote economical and efficient use of land; to increase the level of urban amenities; to preserve the natural environment; and to provide for phased completion of development projects. It generally provides a method for deviating from standardized zoning requirements to foster well planned, creative, and quality development. The planned development combining zone may be combined with any zoning district.

Application Procedure: Prior to application, the prospective applicant should consult with the planning division of the Community Development Department to obtain information and guidance, especially before entering into bidding commitments or incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys, and other data.

Additional application procedures and requirements are detailed within UCC Section 9167.

Applications must be responsive to all requirements in 9167 in order to be deemed complete by the planning division. Applications for planned developments require at least one hearing of the Planning Commission and one hearing of the City Council for approval.

12. SIGN PERMITS
Description: City regulations pertaining to signs are prescribed in UCC Section 3225. Please also refer to the Sign Checklist and Inventory informational brochure attached to this supplement and available on the planning services division webpage and at the planning counter.

Application Procedure: All applications will be submitted to the Building Division of the Community Development Department, along with the requisite fee and completed Sign Checklist.

13. SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
Purpose: A type of discretionary planning permit application, the purpose of a Site Development Permit is to ensure that development enhances the City’s character and is compatible with the architectural style and design characteristics of the area in which it is located. A Site Development Permit is required for the new construction or exterior modification of commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential structures.

Project Review: Projects are reviewed for site planning, vehicle and pedestrian circulation, architectural design, quality and type of materials, colors, landscaping, lighting, and signage.

Projects are referred to City Divisions and Departments (such as Building Division, Public Works Department, Fire Department, Police Department, and Electric Utility Department) for review and comment. Projects are also sent to outside agencies that may have review or permitting authority over the Project (such as Mendocino County Air Quality Management District, Regional Water, Environmental Health, Caltrans, Alcohol Beverage Control).

Page 415 of 750 ends

required to provide additional information needed to complete the required environmental review (such as a traffic study, noise study, drainage report, arborist report).

Decision Making: Depending on the size and scope of the project, Site Development Permits are reviewed and decided upon by the Zoning Administrator (minor site development permits) or Planning Commission (major site development permits). Staff will prepare a staff report for the project and make a recommendation to the decision maker to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the project. In order to approve a Site Development Permit, the project must be consistent with the findings required for approval (Ukiah City Code Section 9263(E)). The decision maker has the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny a project.

Exempt Projects: Interior remodels and repair and maintenance of structures and parking areas are exempt from the requirement to obtain a Site Development Permit. Some minor remodels and alterations of building exteriors and accessory structures may also be exempt. When determining if the Project is exempt, the Community Development Director considers the size, location and visibility of the Project, and the amount of change to the architectural character or appearance of the structure.

14. SUBDIVISIONS
Definition: Per UCC Section 8026, a subdivision is the division of any improved or unimproved land, shown on the latest equalized county assessment roll as a unit or as contiguous units for the purpose of sale, lease or financing, whether immediate or future. Property shall be considered as contiguous units even if it is separated by roads, streets, utility easement or railroad rights of way. Subdivision includes a condominium project, as defined in Section 1350 of the Civil Code or a community apartment project, as defined in Section 11004 of the Business and Professions Code. Any conveyance of land to a governmental agency, public entity or public utility shall not be considered a division of land for purposes of computing the number of parcels. Minor subdivision shall be as defined in UCC Section 8300.

Application Procedure: Review the informational brochures for minor and major subdivisions attached to this supplement and available on the planning services division webpage and at the planning counter. Then complete and sign a planning permit application; and submit the application to the planning division of the Community Development Department, along with the required fee and submittal information and documents required within the brochure’s checklist.

Once applications are deemed complete, planning staff will schedule a review with the City Engineer who will approve, conditionally approve, or deny the request for subdivision. After approval of the tentative map, the applicant will be required to hire a land surveyor to conduct a property survey and prepare a final subdivision map for recording purposes. The draft Final Map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works along with applicable fees for review and approval. The Final Map must be filed for recording and any conditions of approval satisfied within the specified time frames.

Page 416 of 750 ends

15. VARIANCES
Description: A type of discretionary planning permit, A variance is a permit to deviate from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance. It provides relief from specific site development regulations. It is provided for because there are individual lots which, due to some unusual characteristic, cannot be put to productive use if all detailed regulations (e.g., yard setbacks, height) are strictly applied.

Variances are not issued for land uses ("use variance") or relief of lot size requirements. The detailed provisions for variances are contained in UCC Section 9264.

Application Procedure: Applications for variances shall be made to the City Planning Division by filling out the required variance application form, and submitting a detailed plot plan of the subject property, as well as surrounding land uses, elevation drawings, and any other projectrelated information deemed necessary by the Department. The appropriate filing fee must also be paid at the time of application submittal.

Public Noticing: The City shall follow the public noticing procedures of the California Government Code. Failure of any person to receive mailed notice or failure to post notice shall not invalidate any proceedings conducted by the decision-making body. Unless in conflict with the provisions of the Government Code, notices of public hearings on applications for variances shall be given at least ten (10) days prior thereto.

Types of Variances: There are two types of variances- minor variances and major variances.

Minor variance applications are those seeking less than fifty percent (50%) relief from a yard setback requirement in a particular zoning district, or a height of less than five feet (5’) over what is allowed in a particular zoning district. Applications for minor variances will be considered and acted upon by the Zoning Administrator.

Major variances are those seeking more than 50% relief from a yard setback requirement in a particular zoning district, or a height of more than 5’ over what is allowed in a particular zoning district. Applications for major variances will be considered and acted upon by the Planning Commission.

Page 417 of 750 ends

1 Planning Division Fee Schedule Discounts
Historical Research and Analysis Report
May 2024
Overview
Research was conducted by City Staff into the origin of Community Development Department Planning Division fee discounts in place as of the date of the last adoption of the Fee Schedule in February 2024 (Resolution No. 2024-05). The report below provides details of this research, as well as conclusions.

Summary of Research into Historical Documents

1. Fees for planning and zoning activities were modified a total of six times between 1964 and 2002, but per an April 20, 2005, staff report prepared by former Planning and Community Development Director Charley Stump, 2002 appears to be the first year in which both cost recovery and fee discounts were implemented. "The purpose of raising the fees in 2002 was to maintain an approximate 75% salary cost recovery for processing the planning and zoning permit applications. Director Stump further noted “The City Council at that time felt comfortable providing a 25% subsidy to the development community to "assist" economic development."
Director Stump's assertion that the 2002 City Council sought to utilize a 25% subsidy to assist (incentivize) economic development is validated by a review of Resolution No. 2002- 41, adopted June 19, 2002. In addition to the subsidy for economic development, through Recital #10 the Resolution also established the first instance of discounted fees- in this case for affordable and special needs housing projects.

Recital 10- The City desires to provide an incentive to affordable housing projects by not increasing the current fees for projects involving 100% of the housing units to be "locked-in" affordable to citizens earning less than 80% of the area median income, "sweat-equity" residential projects, residential second units, and projects involving housing for identified groups in need such as seniors, homeless persons, and the mentally ill.

2. The practice of fully recovering the costs of certain major planning permits, known as Cost Recovery, was first implemented by the City on June 1, 2005, through the Council’s adoption of Resolution No. 2005-47. Prior to that date, all applications were processed as "Level 1" or "Level 2" permits subject to a "flat rate" fee approach.

A Cost Recovery Study undertaken to make recommendations to the Council for the 2005 fee schedule update indicated that the fees collected for the processing of planning permits ATTACHMENT 3

Page 418 of 750 ends

2 ranged from 4.7% to 17% of the cost of processing the permits. In other words, the Cost Recovery Study found that prior to adoption of the Cost Recovery practice, the City was subsidizing 83% – 95.3% of the total cost for major planning permit development projects.

Because adoption of Resolution No. 2005-47 resulted in major planning permits being subject to full cost recovery, the 25% subsidy for economic development was in effect discontinued. However, the Resolution did prescribe a new 20% discount for affordable housing projects and a 40% discount for special needs housing projects, as depicted in Recitals #14 and #15:

Recital 14- The City desires to maintain low fees (80% cost recovery) for affordable housing projects (projects that are "locked-in" affordable to citizens earning less than 80% of the area median income, "sweat-equity" residential projects, and residential second units).

Recital 15- The City desires to maintain low fees (60% cost recovery) for projects involving housing for identified groups in need such as seniors, homeless persons, and the mentally ill.

3. No additional fee discounts were adopted in 2007 through Resolution No. 2007-11, which was the last adopted fee schedule for the planning division until 2016. The 2007 Resolution continued the aforementioned affordable housing and special needs fee discounts.

4. The origin of the remaining six fee discounts dates back to an April 20, 2016, staff report prepared for the Council by Director Stump. The staff report proposed fee reductions as "incentives" to encourage "...projects that provide significant economic development, new industrial/manufacturing development, significant energy conservation, and certain public benefits." (Director Stump, 4/20/16 staff report)
This is also when the fee discount table was first introduced by Staff. In the April 20, 2016, staff report, the table is described as "Preliminary Fee Reductions to Promote Economic Development, Energy Conservation and Public Benefits" and the description is that "Staff has developed a number of potential fee reductions to promote local economic development and energy conservation and to incentivize projects that provide public benefits." On June 1, 2016, Council adopted Resolution No. 2016-30, approving Staff’s recommendations for fee discounts. The fee discount table within the resolution is shown in Figure 1 below. The description of the purpose of the fee discounts is described within Recital 13 of Resolution No. 2016-30:

Recital 13: The City has determined that fee reductions for projects that promote/provide economic development, energy conservation and public benefits is reasonable and appropriate.

5. Fee discounts first adopted in June 2016 have been continued within all subsequently adopted fee schedules, for the years 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2024.

Page 419 of 750 ends

3 Figure 1: Fee Reductions Table per Resolution No. 2016-30, adopted June 1, 2016 Economic Development
Energy Conservation
Public Benefit Components
Fee Reduction
Project Design: Solar PV, LEED certification,
public access easement (creeks, streets,
pedestrian paths, etc.), substantial over-planting of
trees, significant creek restoration and/or public
access, and similar design elements.
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Downtown Businesses: Planning Applications
made by downtown businesses (DZC area) –
new business or expansion of existing business
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Industrial/Light Manufacturing: Planning Applications
for industrial or light manufacturing businesses.
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Public Art: Locally inspired publicly “accessible” art
included as prominent component in project
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Community gardens, outdoor dining, live
entertainment, sidewalk cafés and tasting rooms.

No Planning Permit or Fees required –
must comply with specific standards
Energy and Water Conservation: Installation of
significant energy or water conservation fixtures,
appliances or equipment beyond green building code
requirements.
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Affordable Housing Projects: Projects restricting
100% of units to qualifying tenants and homeowners
with incomes of no more than 80% of Mendocino
County Area Median Income.
80% deposit and 80% cost recovery rather
than 100% on Planning Permits
Special Needs Housing Projects: Projects involving
permanent supportive rental housing for special
needs individuals, such as individuals experiencing
homelessness and/or with mental illness.
60% deposit and 60% cost recovery rather
than 100% on Planning Permits
Analysis
There are different approaches to incentivizing certain types of development. Some jurisdictions opt for reducing fees. Others seek to add certainty into the zoning and permitting process, including streamlining of permits and processes. Although the first approach of reducing fees can be easier for Planning and Community Development Departments to implement, involving little if any changes to zoning or processes, Staff was unable to find clear data or studies demonstrating that a fee reduction alone incentivized development.

Rather, it appears that if fees are set at rates that are “excessive,” or above regional market rates for fees, they can act as barriers to development.

Page 420 of 750 ends

4 Related to housing development, for example, a book written by Shawn Phillips in 2020, The Affordable City- Strategies for Putting Housing Within Reach (and Keeping it There), recommends cities implement such strategies as "Strive for Objective, Consistent Rules," (Chapter 12), "Increase Zoning Capacity" (Chapter 15), "Upzone Many Places at Once" (Chapter 16), "Allow Housing in Commercial Zones" (Chapter 19), "Make Development Approvals By Right" (Chapter 24), and "Speed up the Entitlement Process" (Chapter 25).

Indeed, the City has enacted many of these recommended strategies through accelerated implementation of the 2017 Housing Strategy and 2019-2027 Housing Element, facilitating the greatest number of new housing units constructed over a five-year period than at any point in the City's history, as well as the City's earning of HCD's coveted ProHousing designation.

Comparisons of Planning Division Application Data Since June 1, 2016 To analyze the impact the eight fee discounts had on incentivizing economic development, energy conservation, and public benefit-producing projects, Staff reviewed the number of new planning applications received, by year, since the adoption of Resolution No. 2016-30 for each of the eight categories. This data was then compared to the total number of all applications received for each year to understand if any causal relationship may be present. • 6/1/16-12/31/16: one (1) application received for fee discount category out of total of 18 applications.
• Calendar Year (CY) 2017: four (4) applications received for fee discount categories out of total of 29 applications.
• CY 2018: one (1) application received for fee discount category out of total of 38. • CY 2019: one (1) application received for fee discount category out of total of 27. • CY 2020: zero (0) applications received for fee discount categories out of total of 19. • CY 2021: four (4) applications received for fee discount categories out of total of 30. • CY 2022: three (3) applications received for fee discount categories out of total of 24. • CY 2023: one (1) application received for fee discount category out of total of 11. • 1/1/24-4/30/24: one (1) application received for fee discount category out of total of 9.

Additional Statistics of Note
• For all years, 2016-2024, zero (0) applications were received for the categories of Project Design or Industrial/Light Manufacturing.
• Two (2) applications were submitted within the Energy and Water Conservation Design category, and both of these were for housing projects submitted in 2017. • Of the seven (7) applications for businesses within the Downtown during the period, only one was for a new construction project.
• By a nearly two-to-one margin, the most frequently submitted application type for 2016-2024 was the minor use permit, which is not subject to cost recovery or fee discounts.

Conclusions

1. Based on the research and analysis in this report, Staff finds no evidence that the fee discounts incentivized development of the types of projects originally envisioned.

Developers have commented throughout the last seven years that they are primarily seeking certainty in the entitlement process, rather than reduced fees.

Page 421 of 750 ends

5 2. Planning approaches such as "performance zoning," where a city or county adopts an administrative approval process for certain uses that meet objective performance standards, may prove more effective in incentivizing the types of projects first envisioned within the 2016 fee schedule.

Although not yet studied in-depth by Staff, performance zoning and other types of “dynamic zoning” could incentivize economic development efforts, particularly within the downtown.

Performance zoning may still result in cost savings to applicants (in no longer needing discretionary review) while potentially enabling speedier implementation of many of the City's General Plan goals, particularly in the areas of land use, housing, economic development, and local agriculture. This approach could also provide an alternative to the time-intensive and often costly comprehensive zoning code update, as impactful General Plan land use implementation programs could be made incrementally.

The success of the zoning code amendment adopted by Council in 2021 to allow new housing construction by right in commercial and residential zoning districts, provided the project meets the City's Objective Design and Development Standards, is a good example of performance zoning. The first such by-right housing project in Ukiah, Acorn Valley Plaza, was through the City's objective design standards review process and issued a building permit within two months of submittal of the building permit application. With two other multiunit housing projects currently in the pipeline, this approach is proving effective for facilitating new housing.

3. Current State laws such as the California Building Code mandate such energy conservation and solar measures envisioned within the 2016 fee schedule. Where not mandated by State law, the City has integrated many of the Project Design and Energy and Water Conservation features into the Objective Design and Development Standards for new housing projects.

The same types of standards could be designed for commercial projects.

Page 422 of 750 ends

Fee Reductions / Discounts Table
Last Adopted February 21, 2024 through Resolution No. 2024-05 The following fee reductions and discounts shall be applied to all new planning related applications, per the associated application type.

Description of Application Types Qualifying
for Fee Reduction/Discount
Amount of Fee Reduction/Discount
Project Design: Solar PV, LEED certification, public
access easement (creeks, streets, pedestrian paths,
etc.), substantial over-planting of trees, significant
creek restoration and/or public access, and similar
design elements.
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Downtown Businesses: Planning Applications
made by downtown businesses (DZC area) – new
business or expansion of existing business
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Industrial/Light Manufacturing: Planning Applications for industrial or light manufacturing businesses.
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Public Art: Locally inspired publicly “accessible” art
included as prominent component in project
80% cost recovery rather than 100% on
Planning Permits
Community gardens, outdoor dining, live entertainment,
sidewalk cafés and tasting rooms.

Page 423 of 750 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item No: 13.c.

MEETING DATE/TIME: 5/15/2024

ITEM NO: 2024-174

AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Award Contract for Specification No 21-02 – Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 to Granite Construction of Ukiah, CA, in the Amount of $3,179,369.10, and Approve Corresponding Budget Amendment.

DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Myles Fisette
PRESENTER: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Bid Tabulation - Spec. 21-02 Great Redwood Trail Phase 4

2. Granite Bid
Summary: Council will consider awarding a contract to Granite Construction in the amount of $3,179,369.10 for the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4, Specification No 21-02, and consider approving a corresponding budget amendment.

Background: The City of Ukiah was awarded a California Natural Resources Agency grant through the Urban Greening Program for a total of $3,563,212 to fund the design and implementation of Phase 4 of the Great Redwood Trail. For the design component, City Council originally awarded a contract in the amount of $312,491 to GHD Inc. for the completion of the design and preparation of the plans, specification, and estimate of the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 (GRT4) project at the September 15, 2021 meeting. During the development of the plans for this project, GHD and City Staff determined the need to keep the trail parallel to the existing railroad track due to the California Utilities Commission's (CUC) indecision on approving rail banking at this time. Some of the design elements required in this new alignment included additional earthwork, retaining walls and environmental impact mitigation work with multiple agencies. The additional design and environmental compliance incurred required amendments in design to GHD for a total of $111,776. The GRT4 was originally intended to extend the existing rail trail phase 2 from Commerce Drive south approximately 1.9 miles past Plant Road near the City's wastewater treatment plant. The new phase would provide connectivity from the Redwood Business Park to the Ukiah Animal Shelter, Plant Road.

Discussion: The Request for Bid for construction of Phase 4 was separated into a base bid and bid alternate, with the base bid scope between Commerce Drive and Norgard Lane and the bid alternate extending the trail from Norgard Lane to Plant Road. The low bidder was determined by the base bid only with the bid alternate being considered if within budget. The Request for Bid was released on March 27, 2024, and was advertised in the Ukiah Daily Journal and posted to Bidnet Direct and the City website.

The City received six (6) construction bids for this project (Attachment 1). Granite Construction was the lowest responsible bidder with a base bid amount of $1,777,364.10 and a bid alternate amount of $1,402,005.00 for a total bid amount of $3,179,369.10. A copy of Granite Construction's bid is provided (Attachment 2).

GHD has provided a proposal for environmental compliance in inspection and reporting for Council approval with the corresponding budget item (13e). The total design cost for GHD, including corresponding amendments, totals $487,902.39. The total cost in permit compliance, landscape design, community engagement and seed propagation work completed by contract with NCO and Wild Gardens Manager is $66,776.50. This total of $554,678.89 will all be reimbursed by the CNRA grant, which leaves a balance

Page 424 of 750 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

available for construction of $3,008,533.11, creating an anticipated shortfall of $170,835.99 requiring funding by the City. Staff plans to use SB1 and HUTA monies to fund of the shortfall.

Recommended Action: Award bid to Granite Construction in the amount of $3,179,369.10 for the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4, Specification No 21-02, and approve corresponding budget amendment.

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes
CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 51124210.80230.18253: $3,008,533.11; 50024620.80230.18253: $0 PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: 51124210.80230.18253:
$3,008,533.11; 50024620.80230.18253: $488,772.90
FINANCING SOURCE: Urban Greening Program Grant and SB1 revenues PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A
COORDINATED WITH: Mary Horger, Financial Services Manager; Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works; Andrew Stricklin, Senior Engineer; Seth Strader, Department Analyst – Public Works/Water Resources DIVERSITY-EQUITY INITIATIVES (DEI): Goal 5 – Instill diversity, equity, and inclusion as essential core elements of policy-making, accountability, and delivery of City services.

CLIMATE INITIATIVES (CI): 2b – Encourage active transportation as a viable alternative to automobiles. 2d – Continue to expand the Great Redwood Trail – Ukiah. 4a – Implement nature-based climate solutions. 7a – Expand sustainable water practices. 10a – Protect from dangerous emission by preventing fires.

GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS (GP):

GP-A3 - Mobility Element

Page 425 of 750 ends

BASE BID
Item # Description UOM QTY Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total 1 Construction Staking LS 1 $28,600.00 $28,600.00 $28,600.00 $28,600.00 $51,671.00 $51,671.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $46,873.80 $46,873.80 $47,932.00 $47,932.00 2 Construction Area Signs LS 1 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,245.00 $4,245.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $8,848.00 $8,848.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 Traffic Control System LS 1 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $18,800.00 $18,800.00 $23,594.00 $23,594.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $33,901.33 $33,901.33 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 4 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 1 $2,090.00 $2,090.00 $1,295.00 $1,295.00 $17,896.00 $17,896.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $19,466.64 $19,466.64 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 5 Temporary Water Pollution Control Measures LS 1 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $39,500.00 $39,500.00 $22,589.00 $22,589.00 $56,000.00 $56,000.00 $37,461.29 $37,461.29 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection LS 1 $1,560.00 $1,560.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,784.00 $2,784.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,050.00 $4,050.00 $24,750.00 $24,750.00 7 Temporary Concrete Washout LS 1 $3,100.00 $3,100.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,489.00 $2,489.00 $975.00 $975.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 8 Wetland and Waters Debris Removal CY 29 $285.00 $8,265.00 $1,800.00 $52,200.00 $378.00 $10,962.00 $370.00 $10,730.00 $658.66 $19,101.14 $850.00 $24,650.00 9 Remove and Relocate Miscellaneous Features LS 1 $7,875.00 $7,875.00 $12,900.00 $12,900.00 $13,865.00 $13,865.00 $31,000.00 $31,000.00 $11,750.00 $11,750.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 10 Water Tanks EA 8 $5,750.00 $46,000.00 $2,500.00 $20,000.00 $9,829.00 $78,632.00 $10,500.00 $84,000.00 $8,801.08 $70,408.64 $15,000.00 $120,000.00 11 Temporary High-Visibility Fence (ESA and Tree Fence) LF 786 $5.00 $3,930.00 $6.00 $4,716.00 $11.00 $8,646.00 $9.00 $7,074.00 $8.28 $6,508.08 $9.00 $7,074.00 12 Clearing and Grubbing ACRE 2.4 $11,500.00 $27,600.00 $19,000.00 $45,600.00 $19,001.00 $45,602.40 $37,000.00 $88,800.00 $22,753.38 $54,608.11 $20,000.00 $48,000.00 13 Roadway Excavation CY 2840 $55.00 $156,200.00 $75.00 $213,000.00 $73.00 $207,320.00 $120.00 $340,800.00 $51.10 $145,124.00 $55.00 $156,200.00 14 Structure Excavation (Bridge) CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15 Structure Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY 24 $235.00 $5,640.00 $825.00 $19,800.00 $400.00 $9,600.00 $635.00 $15,240.00 $2,735.23 $65,645.52 $2,800.00 $67,200.00 16 Structure Backfill (Bridge) CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 17 Embankment CY 590 $7.50 $4,425.00 $26.00 $15,340.00 $43.00 $25,370.00 $52.00 $30,680.00 $336.96 $198,806.40 $105.00 $61,950.00 18 Subgrade Enhancement Geotextile, Class A1 SQYD 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 19 Planting Soil Amendment LS 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20 Plant Group C (trees) EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21 Plant Group A (1 GAL, perennials) SQFT 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22 Plant Group B (3 GAL, shrubs) EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23 Plant Group C (Hydroseed) SQFT 14107 $0.30 $4,232.10 $0.54 $7,617.78 $1.00 $14,107.00 $0.30 $4,232.10 $0.66 $9,310.62 $0.30 $4,232.10 24 Landscape Maintenance (1.5 years) LS 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 25 Shade Structure EA 1 $56,050.00 $56,050.00 $44,000.00 $44,000.00 $40,138.00 $40,138.00 $53,000.00 $53,000.00 $50,727.24 $50,727.24 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 26 Picnic Table EA 1 $3,460.00 $3,460.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,822.00 $3,822.00 $5,200.00 $5,200.00 $7,049.33 $7,049.33 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 27 Bench EA 4 $5,440.00 $21,760.00 $4,500.00 $18,000.00 $5,030.00 $20,120.00 $5,300.00 $21,200.00 $5,690.81 $22,763.24 $6,500.00 $26,000.00 28 Bicycle Rack EA 3 $1,910.00 $5,730.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,490.00 $4,470.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00 $915.31 $2,745.93 $4,500.00 $13,500.00 29 Stone Boulder Seating (2'x2'x2') EA 5 $720.00 $3,600.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $770.00 $3,850.00 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 $856.17 $4,280.85 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 30 Bicycle Repair Station EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 31 Wood Mulch CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 32 Class 2 Aggregate Base (CY) CY 2264 $113.00 $255,832.00 $130.00 $294,320.00 $132.00 $298,848.00 $130.00 $294,320.00 $126.69 $286,826.16 $105.00 $237,720.00 33 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 1058 $171.00 $180,918.00 $185.00 $195,730.00 $190.00 $201,020.00 $210.00 $222,180.00 $190.01 $201,030.58 $205.00 $216,890.00 34 Retaining Wall Repair (Masonry Wall) EA 2 $3,050.00 $6,100.00 $22,000.00 $44,000.00 $20,422.00 $40,844.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $3,351.20 $6,702.40 $25,000.00 $50,000.00 35 Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE Wall) SQFT 876 $100.00 $87,600.00 $120.00 $105,120.00 $73.00 $63,948.00 $78.00 $68,328.00 $102.44 $89,737.44 $85.00 $74,460.00 36 Retaining Wall (Modular Wall) SQFT 196 $108.00 $21,168.00 $100.00 $19,600.00 $238.00 $46,648.00 $105.00 $20,580.00 $246.74 $48,361.04 $125.00 $24,500.00 37 Structural Concrete, Bridge Footing, Wingwalls, and Deck CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 38 Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall (Stem & Footing) CY 52 $2,750.00 $143,000.00 $2,750.00 $143,000.00 $2,320.00 $120,640.00 $2,200.00 $114,400.00 $2,922.75 $151,983.00 $3,500.00 $182,000.00 39 Structural Concrete, Headwall CY 14 $4,350.00 $60,900.00 $1,150.00 $16,100.00 $4,447.00 $62,258.00 $2,100.00 $29,400.00 $3,025.04 $42,350.56 $5,200.00 $72,800.00 40 Structural Concrete, Stairs CY 22 $2,825.00 $62,150.00 $6,550.00 $144,100.00 $4,265.00 $93,830.00 $2,100.00 $46,200.00 $3,828.20 $84,220.40 $5,500.00 $121,000.00 41 Furnish and Erect Prefabricated Steel Pedestrian Bridge (30' Span) LS 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 42 Furnish and Erect Prefabricated Steel Pedestrian Bridge (45' Span) LS 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43 24" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 32 $375.00 $12,000.00 $375.00 $12,000.00 $347.00 $11,104.00 $540.00 $17,280.00 $471.33 $15,082.56 $175.00 $5,600.00 44 24" Corrugated Steel Pipe LF 15 $250.00 $3,750.00 $375.00 $5,625.00 $346.00 $5,190.00 $555.00 $8,325.00 $284.99 $4,274.85 $285.00 $4,275.00 45 36" Corrugated Steel Pipe LF 7 $500.00 $3,500.00 $775.00 $5,425.00 $673.00 $4,711.00 $450.00 $3,150.00 $957.16 $6,700.12 $620.00 $4,340.00 46 48" Corrugated Steel Pipe LF 40 $335.00 $13,400.00 $475.00 $19,000.00 $358.00 $14,320.00 $460.00 $18,400.00 $338.28 $13,531.20 $350.00 $14,000.00 47 3" Perforated Plastic Pipe Underdrain LF 40 $76.00 $3,040.00 $3.94 $157.60 $31.00 $1,240.00 $19.00 $760.00 $21.72 $868.80 $60.00 $2,400.00 48 3" Plastic Pipe Underdrain LF 6 $463.00 $2,778.00 $3.86 $23.16 $40.00 $240.00 $145.00 $870.00 $46.50 $279.00 $170.00 $1,020.00 49 Permeable Material (Underdrain) CY 8 $100.00 $800.00 $150.00 $1,200.00 $323.00 $2,584.00 $120.00 $960.00 $124.10 $992.80 $120.00 $960.00 50 Precast Concrete Drop Inlet EA 1 $6,580.00 $6,580.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,628.00 $5,628.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $5,611.14 $5,611.14 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 51 Precast Concrete Storm Drain Manhole EA 1 $9,450.00 $9,450.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,097.00 $8,097.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $6,868.48 $6,868.48 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 52 Adjust Inlet EA 1 $2,405.00 $2,405.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,171.00 $1,171.00 $4,300.00 $4,300.00 $2,464.00 $2,464.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 53 Rock Slope Protection (All Classes, Method B) CY 35 $365.00 $12,775.00 $550.00 $19,250.00 $292.00 $10,220.00 $300.00 $10,500.00 $305.81 $10,703.35 $560.00 $19,600.00 54 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 368 $65.00 $23,920.00 $60.00 $22,080.00 $68.00 $25,024.00 $60.00 $22,080.00 $79.86 $29,388.48 $85.00 $31,280.00 55 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 138 $27.00 $3,726.00 $25.00 $3,450.00 $57.00 $7,866.00 $65.00 $8,970.00 $70.40 $9,715.20 $55.00 $7,590.00 56 Minor Concrete (Concrete Paving) SF 10 $185.00 $1,850.00 $1,300.00 $13,000.00 $490.00 $4,900.00 $250.00 $2,500.00 $1,099.32 $10,993.20 $850.00 $8,500.00 57 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) CY 22 $1,030.00 $22,660.00 $2,800.00 $61,600.00 $3,622.00 $79,684.00 $2,750.00 $60,500.00 $2,552.00 $56,144.00 $2,900.00 $63,800.00 58 Chain Link Roller Gate EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A BID RESULTS - SPEC 21-02 GREAT REDWOOD TRAIL PHASE 4
BID OPENING: 2 PM, APRIL 23, 2024

ARGONAUT CONSTRUCTORS

SANTA ROSA, CA

GHILOTTI BROS WYLOTTI RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, INC.

SAN RAFAEL, CA COVELO, CA
REGE CONSTRUCTION, INC.

CLOVERDALE, CA

GHILOTTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

SANTA ROSA, CA

GRANITE CONSTRUCTION

UKIAH, CA
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 426 of 750 ends

59 Chain Link Fence (Type CL-4) LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 60 Remove Roadside Sign EA 3 $300.00 $900.00 $150.00 $450.00 $288.00 $864.00 $125.00 $375.00 $250.00 $750.00 $75.00 $225.00 61 Roadside Sign - One Post EA 26 $790.00 $20,540.00 $250.00 $6,500.00 $775.00 $20,150.00 $510.00 $13,260.00 $500.00 $13,000.00 $75.00 $1,950.00 62 Roadside Sign - One Post (Interpretive Sign) EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,521.00 $3,042.00 $975.00 $1,950.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $275.00 $550.00 63 LED Border Enhanced Trail Sign EA 1 $27,210.00 $27,210.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $30,658.00 $30,658.00 $28,480.00 $28,480.00 $37,973.33 $37,973.33 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 64 Tubular Handrailing LF 618 $130.00 $80,340.00 $135.00 $83,430.00 $147.00 $90,846.00 $175.00 $108,150.00 $152.33 $94,139.94 $135.00 $83,430.00 65 Pedestrian Handrail LF 233 $247.00 $57,551.00 $300.00 $69,900.00 $284.00 $66,172.00 $175.00 $40,775.00 $290.59 $67,707.47 $255.00 $59,415.00 66 Thermoplastic Crosswalk and Pavement Marking SQFT 634 $13.00 $8,242.00 $13.00 $8,242.00 $14.00 $8,876.00 $13.00 $8,242.00 $29.34 $18,601.56 $13.00 $8,242.00 67 Paint Traffic Stripe - (2-Coat) LF 600 $4.00 $2,400.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 $6.67 $4,002.00 $4.00 $2,400.00 68 Paint Pavement Marking - Trail (2-Coat) SQFT 42 $20.00 $840.00 $20.00 $840.00 $22.00 $924.00 $20.00 $840.00 $60.00 $2,520.00 $20.00 $840.00 69 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 57 $29.00 $1,653.00 $29.00 $1,653.00 $31.00 $1,767.00 $29.00 $1,653.00 $22.67 $1,292.19 $29.00 $1,653.00 70 Remove Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 340 $18.00 $6,120.00 $18.00 $6,120.00 $19.00 $6,460.00 $18.00 $6,120.00 $22.67 $7,707.80 $18.00 $6,120.00 71 Lighting Power Circuits Below Grade (Incl. 2" Conduit) LF 300 $51.00 $15,300.00 $105.00 $31,500.00 $173.00 $51,900.00 $105.00 $31,500.00 $140.00 $42,000.00 $125.00 $37,500.00 72 Street Light and Concrete Base EA 3 $10,561.00 $31,683.00 $11,270.00 $33,810.00 $12,132.00 $36,396.00 $11,270.00 $33,810.00 $15,026.67 $45,080.01 $12,870.00 $38,610.00 73 Electrical Pullbox EA 6 $1,849.00 $11,094.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $1,615.00 $9,690.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 $2,500.00 $15,000.00 74 Service Pedestal LS 1 $30,147.00 $30,147.00 $20,680.00 $20,680.00 $33,909.00 $33,909.00 $20,680.00 $20,680.00 $27,573.33 $27,573.33 $20,680.00 $20,680.00 75 Mobilization (Mobilization, Demobilization and final Cleanup) LS 1 $107,700.00 $107,700.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $177,971.00 $177,971.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 $185,443.15 $185,443.15 $235,000.00 $235,000.00 Bid Alternate
Item # Description UOM QTY Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total Unit Price Item Total 1 Construction Staking LS 1 $18,400.00 $18,400.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $16,200.00 $16,200.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $29,924.33 $29,924.33 $14,204.00 $14,204.00 2 Construction Area Signs LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $6,104.00 $6,104.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $4,692.00 $4,692.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 Traffic Control System LS 1 $24,750.00 $24,750.00 $15,200.00 $15,200.00 $11,695.00 $11,695.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $17,121.73 $17,121.73 $219,000.00 $219,000.00 4 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 1 $450.00 $450.00 $500.00 $500.00 $9,990.00 $9,990.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $10,799.97 $10,799.97 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 5 Temporary Water Pollution Control Measures LS 1 $15,350.00 $15,350.00 $36,322.00 $36,322.00 $17,911.00 $17,911.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.00 $11,007.73 $11,007.73 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection LS 1 $1,560.00 $1,560.00 $925.00 $925.00 $1,991.00 $1,991.00 $1,991.83 $1,991.83 $750.00 $750.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 7 Temporary Concrete Washout LS 1 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $2,497.00 $2,497.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 8 Wetland and Waters Debris Removal CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9 Remove and Relocate Miscellaneous Features LS 1 $18,750.00 $18,750.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $1,538.00 $1,538.00 $31,000.00 $31,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 10 Water Tanks EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 Temporary High-Visibility Fence (ESA and Tree Fence) LF 33 $37.00 $1,221.00 $30.00 $990.00 $11.00 $363.00 $17.00 $561.00 $21.38 $705.54 $15.00 $495.00 12 Clearing and Grubbing ACRE 1 $34,000.00 $34,000.00 $27,810.00 $27,810.00 $24,686.00 $24,686.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $40,574.52 $40,574.52 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 13 Roadway Excavation CY 940 $99.00 $93,060.00 $140.00 $131,600.00 $84.00 $78,960.00 $130.00 $122,200.00 $81.22 $76,346.80 $125.00 $117,500.00 14 Structure Excavation (Bridge) CY 51 $325.00 $16,575.00 $1,200.00 $61,200.00 $340.00 $17,340.00 $588.00 $29,988.00 $876.62 $44,707.62 $350.00 $17,850.00 15 Structure Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 16 Structure Backfill (Bridge) CY 29 $580.00 $16,820.00 $1,725.00 $50,025.00 $1,058.00 $30,682.00 $875.00 $25,375.00 $959.54 $27,826.66 $950.00 $27,550.00 17 Embankment CY 310 $14.00 $4,340.00 $26.18 $8,115.80 $82.00 $25,420.00 $60.00 $18,600.00 $266.46 $82,602.60 $180.00 $55,800.00 18 Subgrade Enhancement Geotextile, Class A1 SQYD 234 $16.00 $3,744.00 $12.00 $2,808.00 $11.00 $2,574.00 $12.00 $2,808.00 $26.11 $6,109.74 $9.00 $2,106.00 19 Planting Soil Amendment LS 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20 Plant Group C (trees) EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21 Plant Group A (1 GAL, perennials) SQFT 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22 Plant Group B (3 GAL, shrubs) EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23 Plant Group C (Hydroseed) SQFT 7596 $0.50 $3,798.00 $0.69 $5,241.24 $1.00 $7,596.00 $0.50 $3,798.00 $0.98 $7,444.08 $0.70 $5,317.20 24 Landscape Maintenance (1.5 years) LS 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 25 Shade Structure EA 1 $62,500.00 $62,500.00 $44,000.00 $44,000.00 $40,269.00 $40,269.00 $57,000.00 $57,000.00 $50,727.24 $50,727.24 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 26 Picnic Table EA 1 $5,050.00 $5,050.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,510.00 $3,510.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $7,049.33 $7,049.33 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 27 Bench EA 1 $6,175.00 $6,175.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,052.00 $5,052.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $2,055.80 $2,055.80 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 28 Bicycle Rack EA 3 $3,060.00 $9,180.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,495.00 $4,485.00 $1,750.00 $5,250.00 $955.99 $2,867.97 $4,800.00 $14,400.00 29 Stone Boulder Seating (2'x2'x2') EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 30 Bicycle Repair Station EA 1 $6,780.00 $6,780.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,171.00 $4,171.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $8,090.50 $8,090.50 $4,100.00 $4,100.00 31 Wood Mulch CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 32 Class 2 Aggregate Base (CY) CY 1029 $127.00 $130,683.00 $165.00 $169,785.00 $146.00 $150,234.00 $135.00 $138,915.00 $126.96 $130,641.84 $135.00 $138,915.00 33 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 505 $204.00 $103,020.00 $185.00 $93,425.00 $221.00 $111,605.00 $260.00 $131,300.00 $211.70 $106,908.50 $225.00 $113,625.00 34 Retaining Wall Repair (Masonry Wall) EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 35 Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE Wall) SQFT 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 36 Retaining Wall (Modular Wall) SQFT 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 37 Structural Concrete, Bridge Footing, Wingwalls, and Deck CY 72 $3,500.00 $252,000.00 $2,750.00 $198,000.00 $2,112.00 $152,064.00 $3,000.00 $216,000.00 $2,660.23 $191,536.56 $3,200.00 $230,400.00 38 Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall (Stem & Footing) CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 39 Structural Concrete, Headwall CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 40 Structural Concrete, Stairs CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 41 Furnish and Erect Prefabricated Steel Pedestrian Bridge (30' Span) LS 1 $143,650.00 $143,650.00 $141,000.00 $141,000.00 $109,998.00 $109,998.00 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 $94,860.00 $94,860.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 42 Furnish and Erect Prefabricated Steel Pedestrian Bridge (45' Span) LS 1 $172,600.00 $172,600.00 $188,000.00 $188,000.00 $149,225.00 $149,225.00 $210,000.00 $210,000.00 $123,585.37 $123,585.37 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 43 24" Reinforced Concrete Pipe LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 44 24" Corrugated Steel Pipe LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A TOTAL BID: $1,777,364.10 $2,083,574.54 $2,263,812.40 $2,293,269.10 $2,473,049.70 $2,692,338.10

Page 427 of 750 ends

45 36" Corrugated Steel Pipe LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46 48" Corrugated Steel Pipe LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 47 3" Perforated Plastic Pipe Underdrain LF 98 $76.00 $7,448.00 $3.94 $386.12 $18.00 $1,764.00 $35.00 $3,430.00 $46.87 $4,593.26 $55.00 $5,390.00 48 3" Plastic Pipe Underdrain LF 45 $85.00 $3,825.00 $3.86 $173.70 $40.00 $1,800.00 $150.00 $6,750.00 $69.14 $3,111.30 $55.00 $2,475.00 49 Permeable Material (Underdrain) CY 4 $164.00 $656.00 $150.00 $600.00 $324.00 $1,296.00 $130.00 $520.00 $332.32 $1,329.28 $125.00 $500.00 50 Precast Concrete Drop Inlet EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 Precast Concrete Storm Drain Manhole EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 52 Adjust Inlet EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 53 Rock Slope Protection (All Classes, Method B) CY 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 54 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 55 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 60 $33.00 $1,980.00 $25.00 $1,500.00 $57.00 $3,420.00 $75.00 $4,500.00 $70.40 $4,224.00 $55.00 $3,300.00 56 Minor Concrete (Concrete Paving) CY 7 $1,862.00 $13,034.00 $1,800.00 $12,600.00 $3,386.00 $23,702.00 $2,750.00 $19,250.00 $2,254.34 $15,780.38 $3,000.00 $21,000.00 57 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) CY 3 $5,600.00 $16,800.00 $2,800.00 $8,400.00 $6,840.00 $20,520.00 $5,500.00 $16,500.00 $2,552.00 $7,656.00 $3,500.00 $10,500.00 58 Chain Link Roller Gate EA 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,480.00 $6,480.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $7,504.41 $7,504.41 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 59 Chain Link Fence (Type CL-4) LF 336 $70.00 $23,520.00 $70.00 $23,520.00 $95.00 $31,920.00 $70.00 $23,520.00 $50.04 $16,813.44 $125.00 $42,000.00 60 Remove Roadside Sign EA 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 $150.00 $600.00 $289.00 $1,156.00 $125.00 $500.00 $250.00 $1,000.00 $75.00 $300.00 61 Roadside Sign - One Post EA 11 $790.00 $8,690.00 $250.00 $2,750.00 $959.00 $10,549.00 $510.00 $5,610.00 $500.00 $5,500.00 $125.00 $1,375.00 62 Roadside Sign - One Post (Interpretive Sign) EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,526.00 $3,052.00 $975.00 $1,950.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $75.00 $150.00 63 LED Border Enhanced Trail Sign EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 64 Tubular Handrailing LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 65 Pedestrian Handrail LF 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 66 Thermoplastic Crosswalk and Pavement Marking SQFT 184 $13.00 $2,392.00 $13.00 $2,392.00 $24.00 $4,416.00 $13.00 $2,392.00 $29.34 $5,398.56 $13.00 $2,392.00 67 Paint Traffic Stripe - (2-Coat) LF 769 $4.00 $3,076.00 $4.00 $3,076.00 $5.00 $3,845.00 $4.00 $3,076.00 $6.67 $5,129.23 $4.00 $3,076.00 68 Paint Pavement Marking - Trail (2-Coat) SQFT 21 $20.00 $420.00 $20.00 $420.00 $22.00 $462.00 $20.00 $420.00 $60.00 $1,260.00 $20.00 $420.00 69 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 10 $29.00 $290.00 $29.00 $290.00 $31.00 $310.00 $29.00 $290.00 $22.67 $226.70 $29.00 $290.00 70 Remove Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 71 Lighting Power Circuits Below Grade (Incl. 2" Conduit) LF 100 $51.00 $5,100.00 $105.00 $10,500.00 $98.00 $9,800.00 $105.00 $10,500.00 $140.00 $14,000.00 $155.00 $15,500.00 72 Street Light and Concrete Base EA 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 73 Electrical Pullbox EA 4 $1,260.00 $5,040.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $1,620.00 $6,480.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 74 Service Pedestal LS 1 $13,178.00 $13,178.00 $10,340.00 $10,340.00 $11,167.00 $11,167.00 $10,340.00 $10,340.00 $13,786.66 $13,786.66 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 75 Mobilization (Mobilization, Demobilization and final Cleanup) LS 1 $132,500.00 $132,500.00 $68,800.00 $68,800.00 $74,659.00 $74,659.00 $270,000.00 $270,000.00 $76,230.00 $76,230.00 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 Sub: Work: Sub: Work: Sub: Work: Sub: Work: Sub: Work: Sub: Work:

ARROW FENCING FENCING TYRELL RESOURCES CLEARING & GRUBBING

DEVINCENZI
CONCRETE CONST.

STRUCTURAL & MINOR
CONCRETE ITEMS. DETECTABLE

WARNING SURFACE

DARREN TAYLOR
CONTRUCTIO0N STRIPING NCRM, INC

SWPPP DEVELOPMENT

AND MANAGEMENT

DARREN TAYLOR

CONSTRUCITON
REMOVE + INSTALL

STRIPING

DARREN TAYLOR

CONSTRUCTION STRIPING

NITTA EROSION

CONTROL HYDROSEED

DARREN TAYLOR

CONSTRUCTION

THERMO PAINT STRIP,
THERMO +PAINT REMOVAL

CAMBLIN STEEL

SERVICE INC REBAR

ZUMWALT &

ASSOCIATES EROSION

CONTROL

BMP AND EROSION

CONTROL

MIKE BROWN
ELECTRIC LIGHTING + ELECTRICAL

DT FABRICATION RAILING

MIKE BROWN

ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL

CINQUINI
+PASSARINO. INC STACKING

TYRELL RESOURCES

INC CLEARING TOBY'S TRUCKING, INC TRUCKING

DEVINCENZI

CONCRETE

CONSTRUCTION

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ,

MINOR CONCRETE

CAMBLIN STEEL REINFORCING STEEL ARROW FENCING FENCING, GATES, HANDRAILS DANIEL STEEL +

MACHINE PROVIDE AND INSTALL BRIDGES

MIKE BROWN

ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL

PAVEMENT

ENGINEERING, INC

QUALITY CONTROL

INSPECTIONS AND

MATERIALS TESTING DT FABRICATION

SUPPY AND INSTALL

RAILING
T&S INC. SIGNAGE

CAMBLIN STEEL

SERVICE REBAR

MIKE BROWN

ELECTRIC

TRAIL SIGN, POWER CIRCUITS,

STREET LIGHT BASE, PULL

BOXES, PEDESTAL ZEPPETINI INC HANDRAIL

DT FABRICATION

WELDING

HANDRAIL

FABRICATION AND

INSTALLATION
ZUMWAL +

ASSOCIATES

TEMP EROSION AND

HYDROSEED

TYRELL TREE REMOVAL

DARREN TAYLOR
CONTRUCTIO0N STRIPING & MARKING ARROW FENCING GATE+FENCE

DEVINCENZI CONCRETE

CONSTRUCTION

CONCRETE

WORK(RETAINING

WALL, MINOR

CONCRETE)
DANIEL STEEL +

MACHIN, INC
SUPPY + INSTALL PED
BRIDGE

COASTAL

MOUNTAIN

ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL DT FABRICATION
TUBULAR + PEDESTRAIN

HANDRAILS

SPECIALIZED

PACEMENT MARKING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TOTAL BID: $1,402,005.00 $1,365,794.86 $1,202,958.00 $1,712,084.83 $1,284,479.65 $1,828,130.20

Page 428 of 750 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 429 of 750 ends

Page 430 of 750 ends

Page 431 of 750 ends

Page 432 of 750 ends

Page 433 of 750 ends

Page 434 of 750 ends

Page 435 of 750 ends

Page 436 of 750 ends

Page 437 of 750 ends

Page 438 of 750 ends

Page 439 of 750 ends

Page 440 of 750 ends

Page 441 of 750 ends

Page 442 of 750 ends

Page 443 of 750 ends

Page 444 of 750 ends

Page 445 of 750 ends

Page 446 of 750 ends

Page 447 of 750 ends

Page 448 of 750 ends

Page 449 of 750 ends

Page 450 of 750 ends

Page 451 of 750 ends

Page 452 of 750 ends

Page 453 of 750 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item No: 13.d.

MEETING DATE/TIME: 5/15/2024

ITEM NO: 2024-113

AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Approval of a Contract Amendment 3 and 4 for the Additional Design and Environmental Services by GHD Engineers for Technical Services Related to the Great Redwood Trail, in the Amount of $63,635.39, and Approve Corresponding Budget Amendment.

DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Seth Strader, Administrative Analyst PRESENTER: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/CIty
Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Original Agreement

2. Amendment 1

3. Amendment 2

4. Proposed Amendment 3

5. 2024-4-26 Amendment 4_Rev1
Summary: The City Council will consider approval of a contract and budget amendments with GHD Inc for additional design and environmental reveiw support for the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4.

Background: At the September 15, 2021 meeting, Council awarded a professional services agreement with GHD Inc for the design of Phase 4 of the Great Redwood Trail. This phase extends the existing terminus of the trail on Commerce Drive south; see Attachment 1 for a copy of this agreement. Since entering into an agreement with GHD Inc, there have been two additional amendments to the contract for additional design and permitting related to the alignment of the trail; see Attachment 2 and 3. The construction of the trail requires various engineering and environmental considerations. Developments, such as the inclusion of irrigation water storage tanks requested by the City and additional work mandated by permitting agencies (USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB), have extended the scope of the project beyond initial estimates.

Unanticipated changes in design, particularly in wetland impacted areas, have necessitated revisions to permit packages and civil grading designs. Furthermore, investigations into potential wetlands and coordination with PG&E for electrical services (for lights along the trail) have added to the project's complexity. These unforeseen tasks require additional engineering and environmental services to ensure project success.

Discussion: The need for a contract and budget amendment for additional engineering and environmental services is evident considering the unanticipated challenges faced by the project. The inclusion of irrigation water storage tanks, coordination with permitting agencies, revisions to design due to conservative interpretations of wetland criteria, and investigations into the spring alignment all require specialized expertise and resources. Failure to address these additional services could lead to delays, cost overruns, and potential compliance issues with regulatory agencies, ultimately jeopardizing the project's success. Please see Attachment 4 and Attachment 5 for the proposal for these services.

Like the previous two amendments, the additional funds requested for Amendments 3 and 4 would be reimbursed by the Urban Greening Grant. Amendment 3 would bring the contract total to $487,902.39.

Recommended Action: Approve contract amendment 3 and 4 and budget amendment in the amount of $63,635.39 for additional Design and Environmental Services.

Page 454 of 750 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: YES
CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 51124210.80230.18253: $0
PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: 51124210.80230.18253: $63,635.39 FINANCING SOURCE: Grant Funds
PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: 2122118
COORDINATED WITH: Andrew Stricklin, Senior Engineer and Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works/CIty Engineer.

DIVERSITY-EQUITY INITIATIVES (DEI):

CLIMATE INITIATIVES (CI): 2b – Encourage active transportation as a viable alternative to automobiles. 2d – Continue to expand the Great Redwood Trail – Ukiah.

GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS (GP):GP-A3 - Mobility Element

Page 455 of 750 ends

COU No. 2122118
1 AGREEMENT FOR

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
This Agreement, made and entered into this 13th day of October, 2021 (“Effective Date”), by and between CITY OF UKIAH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "City" and GHD Inc, a Corporation organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of California, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".

RECITALS
This Agreement is predicated on the following facts:
a. City requires consulting services related to preparing plans, specifications, and estimate for the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 (GRT 4) project.
b. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, skills, experience and properly licensed to provide these services, and is willing to provide them according to the terms of this Agreement.
c. City and Consultant agree upon the Scope-of-Work and Work Schedule attached hereto as Attachment "A", describing contract provisions for the project and setting forth the completion dates for the various services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement.

TERMS OF AGREEMENT

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

1.1 The Project is described in detail in the attached Scope-of-Work (Attachment "A").

2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.1 As set forth in Attachment "A".

2.2. Additional Services. Additional services, if any, shall only proceed upon written agreement between City and Consultant. The written Agreement shall be in the form of an Amendment to this Agreement.

3.0 CONDUCT OF WORK

3.1 Time of Completion. Consultant shall commence performance of services as required by the Scope-of-Work upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from City and shall complete such services within the time coordinated with the City. Consultant shall complete the work to the City's reasonable satisfaction, even if contract disputes arise or Consultant contends it is entitled to further compensation.

4.0 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES

4.1 Basis for Compensation. For the performance of the professional services of this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated on a time and expense basis not to exceed a guaranteed maximum dollar amount of $312,491.00. Labor charges shall be based upon hourly billing rates for the various classifications of personnel employed by Consultant to perform the Scope of Work as set for in the attached Attachment B, which ATTACHMENT 1

Page 456 of 750 ends

COU No. 2122118
2 shall include all indirect costs and expenses of every kind or nature, except direct expenses. The direct expenses and the fees to be charges for the same shall be set forth in Attachment B. Consultant shall complete the Scope of Work for the not-toexceed guaranteed maximum, even if actual time and expenses exceed that amount.

4.2 Changes. Should changes in compensation be required because of changes to the Scope-of-Work of this Agreement, the parties shall agree in writing to any changes in compensation. "Changes to the Scope-of-Work" means different activities than those described in Attachment "A" and not additional time to complete those activities than the parties anticipated on the date they entered this Agreement.

4.3 Sub-contractor Payment. The use of sub-consultants or other services to perform a portion of the work of this Agreement shall be approved by City prior to commencement of work. The cost of sub-consultants shall be included within guaranteed not-to-exceed amount set forth in Section 4.1.

4.4 Terms of Payment. Payment to Consultant for services rendered in accordance with this contract shall be based upon submission of monthly invoices for the work satisfactorily performed prior to the date of the invoice less any amount already paid to Consultant, which amounts shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after receipt by City. The invoices shall provide a description of each item of work performed, the time expended to perform each task, the fees charged for that task, and the direct expenses incurred and billed for. Invoices shall be accompanied by documentation sufficient to enable City to determine progress made and to support the expenses claimed.

5.0 ASSURANCES OF CONSULTANT

5.1 Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is solely responsible for its acts or omissions. Consultant (including its agents, servants, and employees) is not the City's agent, employee, or representative for any purpose.

It is the express intention of the parties hereto that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee, joint venturer, or partner of City for any purpose whatsoever. City shall have no right to, and shall not control the manner or prescribe the method of accomplishing those services contracted to and performed by Consultant under this Agreement, and the general public and all governmental agencies regulating such activity shall be so informed.

Those provisions of this Agreement that reserve ultimate authority in City have been inserted solely to achieve compliance with federal and state laws, rules, regulations, and interpretations thereof. No such provisions and no other provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between Consultant and City.

Consultant shall pay all estimated and actual federal and state income and selfemployment taxes that are due the state and federal government and shall furnish and pay worker's compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and any other benefits required by law for himself and his employees, if any. Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold City and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any claims or demands by federal, state or local government agencies for any such taxes or benefits due but not paid by Consultant, including the legal costs associated with defending against any audit, claim, demand or law suit.

Page 457 of 750 ends

COU No. 2122118
3 Consultant warrants and represents that it is a properly licensed professional or professional organization with a substantial investment in its business and that it maintains its own offices and staff which it will use in performing under this Agreement.

5.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional responsibility is solely to City. Consultant has no interest and will not acquire any direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of the Agreement. Consultant shall not in the performance of this Agreement employ a person having such an interest. If the City Manager determines that the Consultant has a disclosure obligation under the City’s local conflict of interest code, the Consultant shall file the required disclosure form with the City Clerk within 10 days of being notified of the City Manager’s determination.

6.0 INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 Insurance Liability. Without limiting Consultant's obligations arising under Paragraph 6.2 Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it procures and maintains for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with its performance under this Agreement.

A. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office ("ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form No. CG 20 10 10 01 and Commercial General Liability Coverage – Completed Operations Form No. CG 20 37 10 01.

2. ISO Form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 "any auto" or Code 8, 9 if no owned autos and endorsement CA 0025.

3. Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance.

4. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant’s profession. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability.

B. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage including operations, products and completed operations. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work performed under this Agreement, or the aggregate limit shall be twice the prescribed per occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

Page 458 of 750 ends

COU No. 2122118
4 3. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability: Worker's compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.

4. Errors and Omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.

C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

D. Other Insurance Provisions
The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages a. The City, it officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects; liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, products and completed operations of the Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, hired or borrowed by the Consultant for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope-of-protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. b. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
d. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

2. Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from Consultant's performance of the work, pursuant to this Agreement.

Page 459 of 750 ends

COU No. 2122118
5 3. Professional Liability Coverage
If written on a claims-made basis, the retroactivity date shall be the effective date of this Agreement. The policy period shall extend one year from date of final approved invoice.

4. All Coverages
Each Insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.

E. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with admitted California insurers with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- for financial strength, AA for long-term credit rating and AMB-1 for short-term credit rating.

F. Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with Certificates of Insurance and with original Endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The Certificates and Endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The Certificates and Endorsements are to be on forms provided or approved by the City. Where by statute, the City's Workers' Compensation - related forms cannot be used, equivalent forms approved by the Insurance Commissioner are to be substituted.

All Certificates and Endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before Consultant begins the work of this Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. If Consultant fails to provide the coverages required herein, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase any or all of them. In that event, the cost of insurance becomes part of the compensation due the contractor after notice to Consultant that City has paid the premium.

G. Subcontractors
Consultant shall include all subcontractors or sub-consultants as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor or sub-consultant. All coverage for sub-contractors or sub-consultants shall be subject to all insurance requirements set forth in this Paragraph 6.1.

6.2 Indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing insurance requirements, and in addition thereto, Consultant agrees, for the full period of time allowed by law, surviving the termination of this Agreement, to indemnify the City for any claim, cost or liability that arises out of, or pertains to, or relates to any negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of services under this contract by Consultant, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by the City, or arising from the active negligence of the City.

Page 460 of 750 ends

COU No. 2122118
6 “Indemnify,” as used herein includes the expenses of defending against a claim and the payment of any settlement or judgment arising out of the claim. Defense costs include all costs associated with defending the claim, including, but not limited to, the fees of attorneys, investigators, consultants, experts and expert witnesses, and litigation expenses.

References in this paragraph to City or Consultant, include their officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors.

7.0 CONTRACT PROVISIONS

7.1 Ownership of Work. All documents furnished to Consultant by City and all documents or reports and supportive data prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are owned and become the property of the City upon their creation and shall be given to City immediately upon demand and at the completion of Consultant's services at no additional cost to City. Deliverables are identified in the Scope-of-Work, Attachment "A".

All documents produced by Consultant shall be furnished to City in digital format and hardcopy. Consultant shall produce the digital format, using software and media approved by City.

7.2 Governing Law. Consultant shall comply with the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, and all local governments having jurisdiction over this Agreement. The interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by California law and any action arising under or in connection with this Agreement must be filed in a Court of competent jurisdiction in Mendocino County.

7.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement plus its Attachment(s) and executed Amendments set forth the entire understanding between the parties.

7.4 Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in effect.

7.5 Modification. No modification of this Agreement is valid unless made with the agreement of both parties in writing.

7.6 Assignment. Consultant's services are considered unique and personal. Consultant shall not assign, transfer, or sub-contract its interest or obligation under all or any portion of this Agreement without City's prior written consent.

7.7 Waiver. No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant, term or condition or a waiver of the covenant, term or condition itself.

7.8 Termination. This Agreement may only be terminated by either party: 1) for breach of the Agreement; 2) because funds are no longer available to pay Consultant for services provided under this Agreement; or 3) City has abandoned and does not wish to complete the project for which Consultant was retained. A party shall notify the other party of any alleged breach of the Agreement and of the action required to cure the breach. If the breaching party fails to cure the breach within the time specified in the notice, the contract shall be terminated as of that time. If terminated for lack of funds or abandonment of the project, the contract shall terminate on the date notice of termination is given to Consultant. City shall pay the Consultant only for services

Page 461 of 750 ends

COU No. 2122118
7 performed and expenses incurred as of the effective termination date. In such event, as a condition to payment, Consultant shall provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder, subject to off-set for any direct or consequential damages City may incur as a result of Consultant's breach of contract.

7.9 Execution of Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, each bearing the original signature of the parties. Alternatively, this Agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission, and in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. When executed using either alternative, the executed agreement shall be deemed an original admissible as evidence in any administrative or judicial proceeding to prove the terms and content of this Agreement.

8.0 NOTICES
Any notice given under this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered or deposited in the mail (certified or registered) addressed to the parties as follows:

CITY OF UKIAH GHD INC
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS MATT KENNEDY
300 SEMINARY AVENUE PO Box 7967
UKIAH, CA 95482-5400 SANTA ROSA, CA 95407

9.0 SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the Effective Date:

GHD INC
BY: __________________________ ____________________

MATT KENNEDY
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Date
__________________
IRS IDN Number

CITY OF UKIAH
BY: ____________________

SAGE SANGIACOMO
CITY MANAGER Date
ATTEST
____________________

KRISTINE LAWLER
CITY CLERK Date
October 13, 2021 98-0425935 MATTHEW G. KENNEDY MATTHEW G. KENNEDY Oct 14, 2021 Kristine Lawler (Oct 14, 2021 11:20 PDT)
Kristine Lawler
Oct 14, 2021 Page 462 of 750
Figure 1: Aerial of Phases 1 and 3
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 7
further development of the NWP Rail Trail project, a 25- year agreement that is critical to the overall success of this four-phase endeavor.

Most of the detailed requirements referenced in the
agreement are described in the NCRA Policy & Procedures Manual, §0907 Trail Projects on the NWP Line Rightsof-Way: Design, Construction, Safety, Operations, and Maintenance Guidelines (Rail-with-Trail Guidelines).

These guidelines encompass requirements for licensing,
permitting, and planning for trail projects in the NCRA R/W. Two of the key planning documents required by
these guidelines are a feasibility study and safety plan.

GHD incorporated the feasibility study and safety plan
documentation in the Phase 1 Trail Corridor Management
Plan, a document that addresses management issues
throughout the study area relating to use and design of the facility. This study and documentation are also needed for Phase 4.

The feasibility study was required to demonstrate a
project’s comprehensive viability, as well as to present an alternatives analysis. The 2012 Mendocino County Rail with Trail Corridor Plan meets these requirements and identifies this Phase 4 project segment as Segment No. S8 and S9.

The safety plan lays out engineering standards,
trespassing and crime prevention strategies, signage,
access points, and methods/processed for coordination
with police and fire protection. GHD and Alta have
completed these documents for previous projects,
including, as previously mentioned, the Phase 1, 2 and
3 portions of the Great Redwood Trail (NWP Rail Trail
project).
→ 2. Project Approach
and Schedule
The Great Redwood Trail
Background (formerly Northwestern
Pacific Rail Trail)
In 1999, the City of Ukiah began to plan a new Class I trail adjacent to the Northwestern Pacific (NWP) railroad tracks in the North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA) right-ofway (R/W) corridor. The trail concept first appeared in the City’s 1999 Bicycle Master Plan, completed by GHD's teaming partner Alta Planning + Design (Alta).

The planning for the overall NWP Rail Trail Project was further advanced in the 2002 Rail Trail Feasibility Study, completed by Alta. The project was ranked as the highest priority in the Bicycle Master Plan in the 2006 Mendocino County Regional Bikeway Plan.

The NWP Rail Trail project has experienced broad
community support and the support of NCRA. Within the
City of Ukiah, the NWP Rail Trail project was divided into three segments, to be implemented in three phases:
− Phase 1: Clara Street in the north to Gobbi Street in the south
− Phase 2: Gobbi Street in the north to Commerce Drive
in the south
− Phase 3: Brush Street in the north to Clara Street in the south
In 2012, the City selected the GHD/Alta team to deliver Phase 1 of the project, which was the first rail-withtrail project to be designed and constructed within the NCRA R/W in Mendocino County. The project involved
surveying and mapping, preparation of the Trail Corridor Management Plan, Safety Plan, and Trail Policy. Services provided by the GHD/Alta included a public workshop
and engineering design. Construction of Phase 1 was
completed in 2015, with GHD providing construction
management and inspection services. In 2018, the
GHD/Alta team was successively selected to prepare
construction documents for both Phases 2 and 3 of the
trail. Construction commenced in the winter of 2019.

GHD assisted the City in obtaining approvals from the
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Caltrans and
NCRA. In addition, GHD assisted with the development of a License Agreement between the City and NCRA for the

ATTACHMENT A

Page 463 of 750 ends

Figure 2: Aerial of ADA ramp
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 8
The Great Redwood Trail Assessment outlines plans for the corridor to be railbanked between Cloverdale and Samoa.

With the passing of State Bill 69 (2021), NCRA has begun the preliminary steps to repurpose the valuable rail line as a recreation and active transportation corridor that will generate economic benefits for dozens of communities.

Railbanking allows railroad owners to preserve established rail lines by transferring them, through sale, donation, or lease, to a qualified public or private entity to manage the ROW as an interim trail. This entity becomes legally and financially responsible for managing the rail corridor ROW.

The corridor can be used as a trail until the need for rail service resumes, at which point the ROW can be converted to, or shared with, the active rail.

Phase 4 Project Understanding
In May 2021 the City received an Urban Greening
Grant from the state administered by California Natural Resources Agency to complete the Phase 4 segment
of the Great Redwood Trail. The Urban Greening Grant
supports projects that reduce Green House Gases (GHG),
by enhancing, expanding and creating neighborhood
parks, provide greening of public lands, mitigating urban heat islands, or developing non-motorized urban trails
that provide safe routes to travel between residences,
workplaces, commercial centers and schools.

In the summer of 2021, the City is expected to complete and file environmental documentation through a CEQA
Notice of Exemption under Section 15304 (Class 4,
construction of a bicycle/multi-use trail within an existing right-of-way).

The Phase 4 trail is approximately 1.9 miles long, which include three new roadway crossings (Airport Road,
Norgard Lane and Plant Road), as well as two existing rail bridge enhancements to support the new trail. At this
time it is not clear who will be removing the existing rail and wood ties, but once the existing rail and rail ties are removed, the trail will be placed on the existing ballast after minor repairs, localized widening and grading have been completed. The trail alignment will match the existing centerline of the existing rail. These opportunities and constraints are described below, under “Approach."
The City has established a schedule for the project, with the goal of completing design in March 2022 in order
to comply with the Performance Period as indicated in
the Urban Greening Grant Agreement. This schedule
is an important goal for the City, as it will ensure that construction moves forward during spring and summer of
2022. Achieving this schedule is contingent on overcoming key project issues, which are also described below, under “Approach."
Developed over the past 15 years, the GHD/Alta team has a very deep understanding of this project. As a result, we are able to leverage our experience from Phases 1, 2 and 3, as well as other similar rail-with-trail projects (described in Sections 3 and 6 of this proposal) to successfully meet the ambitious schedule and deliver all project components to the satisfaction of the City.

Over the past five years, the GHD/Alta team has also
worked directly with NCRA and NWPR/W staff on the
development of numerous rail-with-trail projects in
Northern California. Our trail designs have become the
centerpiece of communities. As trails gain popularity, we recognize the potential for under-utilized land to increase in value, creating the potential for trail-front businesses.

In addition to our combined experience, Alta is also
recognized as a nationwide leader in the development
of trail projects within railroad rights-of-way. Alta
has published reports in collaboration with the U.S.

Department of Transportation that examine safety, design, and liability issues associated with the development of shared use paths and other trails within or adjacent to active railroad and transit rights-of-way.

Page 464 of 750 ends

Phase 4 Approach
In preparing for our proposal, we met with City staff
multiple times to discuss specific details and potential challenges regarding Phase 4 of the project. We walked the site, photo-documented, and conducted a drone fly over
to obtain video and aerial photos of the Phase 4 alignment.

See figure 3.

We obtained and reviewed all background documentation,
including NCRA R/W mapping and applicable policies,
goals, and objectives outlined in the 2015 Ukiah Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (prepared by Alta).

Through our historic understanding of the project and our recent investigative efforts, we have identified some key challenges within Phase 4. The following section identifies these key challenges and GHD’s proposed approach to
each.

Schedule Constraints
To meet the schedule established for this project, it is critical that the approach be efficiently executed with each task. As noted in Section 3, GHD’s project management
and design team has worked with the City on numerous
projects, one of which is under construction. We have an established relationship with City staff, as well as with the City’s Project Manager on this project (Andrew Stricklin), enabling us to focus on the project immediately and
quickly move from the feasibility study into the detailed design phase, as outlined in the RFP (No. 21-02).

The GHD/Alta team is ready to start immediately in order to meet this ambitious schedule. The critical path is to complete the topographic survey and the right-of-way and geotechnical analyses.

GHD previously completed a portion of the base mapping
at Commerce Drive, where the Phase 3 trail begins. This will allow us to build upon the existing base map and
interconnect the base maps from previous projects. We
propose to conduct a focused topographic survey along
the existing rail extending out to the R/W to capture the existing ballast, drainage patterns, trees, road crossing, and railroad equipment. In order to quickly complete the survey, we will use a combination of aerial drone equipment with limited manual survey at specifically and strategically chosen locations, such as at the existing bridges,
culvert crossings, and road crossings. The survey will be completed by GHD’s in-house resources. This survey
approach will minimize costs and allow us to quickly focus on the Preliminary (30%) Design.

Preliminary (30%) Design
Key goals of the Preliminary Design are to verify that the existing rail and rail ballast prism have adequate width and identify where the ballast may need to be widened
to accommodate the Class I multi-use trail. The goal is to minimize the amount of ballast widening and impacts to the existing storm drainage swales, potential sensitive habitat and culvert crossings.

In addition, the new trees, native grasses, and native
shrubs that are selected and planted by the North Coast Opportunities, will be incorporated by the GHD team in
the preliminary design considering the plants functions, i.e., provide shade for the Family gathering area, existing storm water features, wetland enhancement, or simply
decoration. GHD in conjunction with Alta will develop a preliminary plan for the outdoor family gathering space and its amenities, along with other site furnishings along the trail corridor.

The preliminary engineering or 30% design drawings will be utilized to begin conversations with CPUC and the systems needed for the road crossings. The site or street lighting for the Phase 4 trail will not contain trail lighting, but rather lighting only at the roadway crossing for public safety. The intent of the “No” trail lighting is to promote dark sky’s and limit light pollution in the surrounding area.

Right-of-Way Impacts
Based on the current concept trail alignment, no R/W or easement acquisitions are needed. The concept drawings
included in the City’s RFP (21-02) show the trail alignment extending from Commerce Drive south to approximately
340 feet south of Taylor Drive on the existing rail ballast.

From our field review the only railroad equipment is at Commerce Drive, being a control cabinet, and at Norgard Lane being warning flashers. GHD measurements indicate
there is adequate space between all these features to
install the new trail and not affect the existing railroad equipment, utilities, or existing R/W.

Figure 3: Aerial image of existing rail corridor
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 9

Page 465 of 750 ends

Proposed Alignment
The proposed alignment or concept for this phase of Trail is to follow the existing centerline of the existing rail as feasible. The trail maybe offset from the existing centerline to avoid widening any areas beyond the existing ballast slope. The goal is to avoid importing fill material, reduce or eliminate temporary and/or permanent impacts to
wetlands along the corridor. See figure 4.

Placing the trail on the existing ballast will minimize impacts to the environment and and prevent disturbance
of drainage patterns. The trail will be sloped to allow stormwater runoff to drain toward the existing stormwater features and infrastructure that currently runs parallel along the corridor. The City of Ukiah adheres to the City of Santa Rosa Storm Water Low Impact Development
Technical Design Manual for storm water quality and
quantity improvements related to new projects. This
project is exempt from providing storm water low impact improvements. We will include storm water features where feasible.

There are three existing short bridge crossings that
need to be modified to support the construction of
the trail. Provided the foundations and major structural components are adequate to support the loads from the
new trail, GHD will explore possible modification to the existing bridges in an attempt to keep the major structural components as they are indicative of traditional rail
construction. GHD’s preliminary review and modifications include keeping the existing foundations and beams, while removing the existing cross beams and installing a new
concrete deck with curbing and guardrails on both sides.

See figure 5.

We will use the new data collected during the topographic survey and continue the approach of avoiding impacts
as much as practical. This will reduce the need for costly drainage improvements and reduce the potential for having to revisit the City’s CEQA analysis. Where the drainage options in the project area are limited, we will seek to balance the runoff created by the construction of the trail with vegetated buffers to improve the infiltration adjacent to the trail to avoid any increase in the amount of runoff.

The estimated area of disturbance of the project is
anticipated to be greater than two acres, resulting in the need to develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) and the rest of the NPDES stormwater regulatory requirements.

Permitting
GHD will assist the city and the contractor, in obtaining and securing a right-of-way encroachment permit for the removal of the existing rail and construction of the trail crossing the public streets. An encroachment permit will be needed from Caltrans (where the trail crosses under
the Redwood Hwy 101) and county roads at Norgard Lane
and Plant Road. The city will process the encroachment for Airport Road internally. GHD will also coordinate with NCRA and their engineering representative in obtaining approval for this project and obtaining an encroachment.

Existing Bridges
GHD is assuming that the existing foundations and wooden beams will be reusable. This will be verified during the Preliminary (30%) Design. For preliminary design purposes, GHD will remove the existing rails and wood-cross ties and install and new concrete deck with handrails to support the new trail. If the wooden beams are inadequate, GHD
will work with the city on a more efficient design to replace them.

Recycled Water
GHD will investigate the location of the existing reclaimed water system during the Preliminary (30%) Design. GHD will recommend tie-in locations to provide irrigation for the Phase 4 trail planting areas.

Figure 4: Rendering of Phase 4 path along wetlands
Figure 5: Rendering of Phase 4 bridge
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 10

Page 466 of 750 ends

GHD's Code of Conduct and
Core Values
GHD’s Code of Conduct establishes our behavior
expectations and conduct requirements. We promote
ethical business and personal behavior consistent with
our core values of Safety, Teamwork, Respect and
Integrity. This coincides with City of Ukiah’s core values of Professionalism, Service, Teamwork, Innovation and
Safety. We believe that the success of our projects with the City directly correlates. See figure 6.

Phase 4 Scope of Work
The proposed scope of work to complete the planning
and design of Phase 4 of the Great Redwood Trail project is described in the following tasks. We welcome the City’s review of the proposed scope and are open to discussing any changes which may better suit the project needs.

Task 1. Project Management
GHD will be responsible for managing the coordinated
effort of GHD, Alta Planning + Design, and Crawford staff.

This task includes the efforts required for GHD’s Project Manager, with administrative assistance, to manage the
project contract, coordinate team personnel and subconsultants, maintain the project schedule, coordinate, and perform quality assurance and quality control reviews, prepare invoicing, and attend field and deliverable review meetings.

GHD will organize and facilitate a kick-off meeting with the City, Alta, and other key members of the project team. The purpose of the kickoff meeting will be to:
− Discuss the project goals
− Discuss and refine the project’s scope of work and
schedule as needed
− Confirm roles and responsibilities
− Confirm the expectations of the City
− Confirm the schedule for project status meetings
− Confirm and request available background data.

Task 2. Review and Evaluate Existing
Documents and Data
The GHD team will review and summarize existing data
from the site visits, previous studies and plans, survey and record information, and relevant City planning documents.

GHD will specifically review:
− Urban Greening Grant Application and agreement
− 2012 Mendocino County Rail with Trail Corridor Plan
(prepared by GHD and Alta)
− NCRA Rail-with-Trail Guidelines
− License Agreement between the City and NCRA
− 1999 and 2015 Ukiah Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plans (prepared by Alta)
− 2002 Ukiah NWP Rail Trail Feasibility Study (prepared by Alta)
GHD will also review other relevant zoning ordinances and General Plan policies, addressing data gaps with further field review and data collection from the City, NCRA, and local agencies, if necessary.

Specific items to be resolved for project context include:
− Adjacent land uses (both existing and future)
− Access points (vehicular and bike/pedestrian)
− Street crossing conditions/configurations
− Potential environmental impacts
Deliverables:
− No specific deliverables for this task; the results of this task will be reflected in other deliverables, below.

Figure 6: GHD's Core Values
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 11

Page 467 of 750 ends

Assumptions:
− The City will provide access to relevant documents, GIS data, and other documents, as needed, to complete this
task.

Task 3. Topographic Survey and Rightof-Way Determination Right-of-Way and Easement Research and
Review
The GHD team will complete research and review of City
mapping and adjacent parcel boundaries, as well as of
the NCRA R/W, to document the locations of the existing railroad R/W and City of Ukiah R/W, Mendocino County
R/W and Caltrans R/W with the goal of designing the trail corridor improvements to be within either the railroad
R/W or the City/County R/W. GHD is in receipt of the
NCRA R/W mapping for the Phase 4 corridor, and has
previously completed partial mapping of the R/W between Commerce Drive for the Transportation Improvements for
Redwood Business Park project.

Project Control Survey
The GHD team will establish project survey control and
prepare R/W mapping for the project. Our surveyors,
Richard Maddock and Brian Howard, will set horizontal and vertical control points for project mapping in accordance with City of Ukiah horizontal and vertical control
requirements, which also entails locating monuments on
streets adjacent to the railroad R/W, if practical. A “Survey Control Data Sheet”—which will be semi-permanent in
nature to serve as project control during construction, or subsequent survey activities—will exhibit these survey
control points. Our surveyors will make field measurements using GPS and conventional survey methods on the same
horizontal basis as the Transportation Improvements
for Redwood Business Park project, which will allow the work to seamlessly be brought into the City’s GIS system, which is based upon the California State Plane Coordinate System.

The horizontal datum will be based on the North American Datum 83 (NAD 83). The vertical datum will be based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88), which
is consistent with the most recent FEMA flood mapping in Ukiah. GHD will ensure that all surveying and mapping is in compliance with City of Ukiah standards, or with Caltrans standards when not otherwise specified by the City. All of the control can be located by GPS methods at one time.

Mobile LiDAR Topographic Mapping
The GHD team proposes mobile LiDAR topographic
mapping that would cover the project site and immediate surrounding area.

GHD will set control using Global Positioning System
(GPS) methods. GHD will map the project limits using
a drone flyover with mounted mobile LiDAR system. A
scalable point cloud of the project will be provided and georeferenced to the project datum. The LiDAR mapping
will be suitable for compiling a topographic map with the following specifications:
− Finish mapping scale 1 inch = 20 feet
− Contours at 1-foot intervals
GHD will acquire data on all areas obstructed by tree cover or heavy vegetation via ground-based surveys. In addition to topography, the resultant map will show planimetric
features such as roads, railroad tracks, crossing signals, buildings, fences, power poles, trees, brush, and other features according to standard practice. Accuracy will
equal or exceed National Map Accuracy Standards for
topographic maps compiled by mobile LiDAR methods.

Supplemental Topographic Field Surveys
The mobile LiDAR mapping will be supplemented with
ground-based topographic surveys in obstructed areas
and at conforms, utility features, and drainage. GHD will provide field verifications of topographic features, such as trees, fences, etc. This survey will, at a minimum, include:
− Cross sections of the trail corridor and crossing streets at 25’ intervals (surface data will be sufficient to create a Triangular Irregular Network [TIN] for Civil 3D design) − Surface evidence of the storm drain system (ditches,
culverts, catch basins, drop inlets with flow line
elevations)
− Surface evidence of utilities
− Power poles, rail equipment, guy wires, and overhead
lines
− Fencing and gates
− Streetlights, signs, striping, pavement legends, and
markings
− Mailboxes, driveway, and ramps
− Tree trunk locations and diameter
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 12

Page 468 of 750 ends

CAD file set-up and TIN
The GHD team will prepare computer files to include field control points, topographic surveys, utility data, property surveys, and preparation of the TIN used for threedimensional calculations (i.e., earthwork, cross-sections, and profiles).

Vegetation/Tree Survey
Kristine Gaspar, GHD’s environmental scientist, will oversee the identification of trees along critical segments of the NCRA R/W, compiling a description of the trees and
identifying any potential constraints to the trail location created by trees. She will use a handheld GPS location
device to map these vegetative resources as they are
evaluated. The tree locations will be included in the base map.

Deliverables:
− Survey Control Base Map and Topographic Map in 2016
AutoCAD Civil 3D file format point files and the surface model (DTM)
Assumptions:
− No Record of Survey is required.
− All work will be within existing NCRA and City of Ukiah R/W and no additional property boundaries will be
mapped except at roadway intersections.

Task 4. Geotechnical investigation and
report
Limited Geotechnical Investigation
The objective of the GHD team’s geotechnical
investigation is to evaluate and understand the geology and geotechnical engineering properties of the site to provide geotechnical recommendations for foundation design,
pavement design, retaining wall design, and earthwork.

All work will be under the responsible charge of a Chris Trumbull, our team’s licensed Geotechnical Engineer.

Exploration will include up to four (4) borings drilled to depths of 10 to 50 feet in the pathway alignment (one
south of Commerce Dr, one north of the Airport Road
crossing, one by Norgard Lane, one south of Plant Road).

Samples will be obtained for lithology development and
laboratory testing. The borings will be drilled and backfilled with grout under the guidelines of the Mendocino County Environmental Health Department guidelines. GHD will
facilitate laboratory testing for strength, corrosion, index, and pavement, as well as provide engineering analysis for soil compressibility, expansion, liquefaction, earthwork, foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. GHD will
then summarize findings and conclusions in a designlevel geotechnical investigation report, which will include characteristics of the soil and groundwater conditions, a plan showing boring locations, seismicity and geology, liquefaction potential, expansion potential, corrosivity, and lab test data. The report will also include recommendations for questionable soils (expansive, compressible,
liquefiable), earthwork, trenches, foundation bearing and lateral capacities, settlement, CBC seismic design values, and flexible pavement section thickness alternatives.

Deliverables:
− Draft and Final Geotechnical Investigation Report
Assumptions:
− Access to the project site is provided to GHD for
geotechnical exploration; encroachment permits or
rights of entry are provided to GHD.
− Rail safety training or coordination is not required. − Drill sites are accessible by a truck-mounted drill rig. − Drill spoils may be left on site.

Task 5. Preliminary (30%) design
GHD will collaborate with Alta to review the preliminary plans included with the Urban Greening Grant application.

GHD and Alta will prepare a preliminary trail design to meet the requirements of the local codes, AASHTO Guide for
the Planning, Design and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, Caltrans Highway Design Manual Chapter 1000 – Bicycle
Transportation Design, FHWA, MUTCD-CA, the NCRA
Rail-with-Trail Guidelines, the License Agreement between the City and NCRA, and the intended design and use of
the trail and surrounding lands. Once developed, the GHD team will submit the preliminary plans with a cover letter to the following entities for their review:
− City of Ukiah
− NCRA
− Utility companies
− CPUC
We will request that the City, the NCRA, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), and the utility companies
provide summarized, written comments on the preliminary plans. An engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost will also be prepared and submitted.

Following completion of the Preliminary Design, GHD will review the CEQA Categorical Exemption (CatEx) for the
project in the context of the Preliminary Design. The GHD team will also review the CEQA code sections cited that GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 13

Page 469 of 750 ends

were used to qualify the project as a CatEx. Based on
past experience with similar projects, we have observed that the trail should have minimal environmental impacts.

Therefore, it is the GHD team’s assumption that the City’s CatEx will be sufficient, and therefore we are not aware of any additional CEQA work that would be necessary. If additional CEQA efforts are needed, however, they cannot be quantified at this time. If determined to be necessary, we proposed to develop a supplemental CEQA scope
during Preliminary Design.

Drainage Study
The GHD team will conduct field and office research to
evaluate the drainage systems adjacent to the trail prior to beginning the mapping effort. Available drainage studies will be reviewed. Topographic mapping will include the
structures and open ditch conveyances adjacent to
the eastern side of the railroad. Runoff calculations for the 10-year design storm event will be performed and
used to verify drainage system sizing. A brief, written drainage memorandum will summarize the constraints
and recommendations for the drainage improvements
necessary for the construction of the trail, including
addressing flood zones and the three unnamed creek
crossings at existing bridges. The GHD team will use this drainage study to guide the design to address drainage
needs.

Preliminary Plans
The 30% concept level design plans will contain a
conceptual level trail alignment, furnishings, and outdoor family gathering area.

Trail alignment, irrigation, furnishings and family gathering area:
− Intersection designs at the intersections of Commerce Dr, Airport Road, Norgard Lane and Plant Road
− Finalizing trail alignment
− Develop typical trail cross sections throughout project reach for each type of section
− Location and type of proposed bollards and barriers
− Family gathering area layout design, hardscape
materials selection, site furnishings (benches, drinking fountains, waste receptacles, etc)
− Coordination with North Coast Opportunities (NCO) to
integrate their plant selection into the overall design − Coordination of landscape and site elements with trail lighting at intersections
− Irrigation connection to the existing reclaimed water system. Determine feasibility and complexing of system
extension and serviceability.
− Identify locations for rainwater capture and use for
irrigation.
− Wayfinding and interpretive sign locations (content not to be developed in this plan set)
Deliverables:
− Preliminary Plans
− Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
− Preliminary Drainage Study
Assumptions:
− There are no meetings associated with this task.
− LID improvements are not required for the project.

Task 6. Engineering Design (60%, 90%,
and final)
Once comments have been received by the City, NCRA,
CPUC, and utility companies for the 30% design submittal, the GHD team will proceed with the development of the
60% design.

Depending on the timing of these comments, GHD may
request authorization to proceed with the 60% design
sooner in order to meet the City’s deadline for design
completion.

The engineering design will consider review comments
received on the 30% design, which will be incorporated
into the plans, technical specifications, and an opinion of probable construction cost. Submittals will be made to
the City and NCRA for review at the 60% and 90% stages
of completion. The final submittal will be the stamped and signed final bid documents for submission to NCRA, CPUC and California Natural Resources Agency for approval.

Engineering design will include:
− Trail alignment
− Design of trail cross sections throughout the corridor for each type of typical cross section
− Pavement section design
− Intersection designs at the intersections of Commerce Dr, Airport Road, Norgard Lane and Plant Road
− Location of trail amenities and amenity details to be included in the project
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 14

Page 470 of 750 ends

− Trail lighting at roadway intersections to comply with required safety lighting standards
− Grading and drainage
− Wayfinding and interpretive sign locations
− Location and type of proposed bollards and barriers
− Signing and striping
− Landscaping design
Construction Plans
The project will be designed using English Standard units in AutoCAD Civil 3D at a scale of 1 inch = 20 feet depicting the preferred alignment. Electronic copies of the graphic files will be provided in PDF and/or AutoCAD format
using GHD’s AutoCAD standards, including project folder structures, layer names, line styles and font resources, color tables, etc.

GHD will develop the Construction Plans 22” x 34” sheets that allow 50% scaled reduction to 11” x 17” sheets. Design plans will include the title sheet, sheet index, notes/ symbols and abbreviations, typical cross sections, civil site plan and profiles, demolition, site and grading plans for each intersection design, civil and typical details, lighting, signing and striping, landscaping, erosion control, and other sheets and details as necessary for a constructible project and to convey the design intent. All final plans will be stamped and signed by a California Licensed Professional Civil Engineer. Construction plans will be submitted to the City for review at the 60% and 90% stages. Review
comments received will be addressed in the 90% and Final submittals.

Specifications
GHD will prepare technical specifications using the City’s standard format for technical specifications (Sections 12 and 13 of the City boilerplate construction contract). The technical specifications will be developed and submitted to the City for review at the 60% and 90% stages. Review comments received will be addressed in the 90% and final 100% submittals.

Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost: GHD will prepare the Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs using standard engineering estimate procedures for each design submittal (30%, 60%, 90%, and Final). Actual construction costs may vary due to availability of labor, equipment, materials, or market conditions. Applicable
review comments received will be addressed in the 90%
and final 100% submittals. An appropriate contingency and qualifications will be included with each estimate.

Permitting and Agency Coordination
The project is a state funded project through the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) Urban Greening Grant
Program and will require final review and approval from CNRA. GHD will coordinate with the city and provide
plans for submittal to CNRA, as well as address any review comments. In addition to CNRA, plan approval will be
required by CPUC and the NCRA. We will submit and
coordinate plan review and approval with these agencies. If a SWPPP is required, we can develop the SWPPP (optional task) utilizing the California State Water Resources
Board SMARTS (Stormwater Multiple Application and
Report Tracking System) web-based interface. We have
completed several recent projects on this web-based
interface for the City.

Deliverables:
− 60% Submittal will include five (5) hard copies of 11” x 17” plans, specifications, and opinion of probable
construction costs, submitted with electronic PDF files − 90% Submittal will include five (5) hard copies of 11” x 17” plans, specifications, and opinion of probable
construction costs, submitted with electronic PDF files − 100% Submittal will include the final plans,
specifications, and opinion of probable construction
costs ready for bidding purposes, submitted as PDF
electronic files, AutoCAD electronic files of the plans, one (1) set of stamped and wet-signed 22” x 34”
reproducible mylar plans, one (1) copy-ready set of
specifications, 10 copies of 22” x 34” plans on bond,
10 copies of 11” x 17” plans on bond, and 10 copies of
bound specifications
Assumptions:
− The City will provide an electronic copy (MS
Word format) of their current front end contract
requirements, technical specifications, and bid forms.
− The project is anticipated to disturb more than 1 acre, therefore a SWPPP is needed. An optional task for
SWPPP preparation is included.
− Landscaping will be minor and limited to areas near
street crossings, based on the available budget. Related irrigation will be limited to drip irrigation, if necessary, at those locations.
− No trail lighting is included, only lighting at the road crossings will be provided.
− The trail design will conform to the following design standards where applicable:

GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 15

Page 471 of 750 ends

• FHWA/FRA “Best Practices” for Planning and
Designing Rails-with-Trails
• AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle
Facilities
• California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
• Caltrans Chapter 1000: Planning and Designing
Bicycle Facilities
• American with Disabilities Act
Task 7. Supporting Biological Resources
Surveys and Studies
Desktop Review of Available Biological
Information
Prior to on-site surveys, GHD will review biological
resource databases including the California Department
of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the California Native Plant Society
(CNPS) Rare Plant Inventory, and species lists provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Pre-project scoping will include generation of a table showing each special status species’ potential to occur in the project area and inform the optimal time period(s) for biological field surveys.

Deliverables (all electronic PDFs):
− PDF table indicating potential for presence of sensitive biological resources within the project area
Sensitive Natural Community Mapping, and
Habitat Assessment
Vegetation communities within the project area will also be documented in the field and classified at the alliance level according to the Manual of California Vegetation using
the Rapid Assessment method. Rare plants and Sensitive
Natural Communities will be mapped using GPS and aerial imagery. Potential habitat that may support sensitive
wildlife species will also be evaluated at this time, based on an analysis of on-site habitats, known home ranges
and/or distribution of target species, and other biological characteristics. Presence of these resources will be
summarized in the project’s Biological Resources Report, as described below along with supporting data forms, site photos, and a map.

Biological Resources Report
The Biological Resources Report (BRR) will summarize
the potential for special status plants and wildlife, aquatic resources, and Sensitive Natural Communities to occur
within the project area. The BRR will compile: data found during database surveys described above as well as any
available maps, databases, literature specific to local ecology, and any additional information from the client pertaining to the site shall be reviewed. The BRR will
also summarize the results of the rare plants surveys,
Sensitive Natural Community mapping and wildlife habitat assessment. Recommendations for further actions or
mitigation measures to protect biological resources during project implementation will conclude the report. The
report will support the project’s CEQA documentation and anticipated permits.

Deliverables (all electronic PDFs):
− Draft and Final BRR (including maps of sensitive
biological resources detected during surveys)
Aquatic Resources Delineation (Optional)
During a preliminary site visit, several swales and drainages were noted along the rail corridor which could potentially be jurisdictional features. Therefore, GHD recommends
preparing an aquatic resources delineation to support
the design engineers so they can avoid these features to the extend feasible. In addition, the City would need the aquatic resources delineation to support any resource
agency applications that we understand will be prepared by the City. Therefore, we have included this as an optional task for the City’s consideration.

GHD will conduct a delineation of potential wetlands and waters of the United States and/or State in accordance
with the USACE 1987 manual, the Western Mountains,
Valleys, and Coast Region Supplement, the 2020 Navigable Waters Protection Rule and the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State adopted by the State Water
Resources Control Board on April 2, 2019. Field work for the delineation will be conducted on the same day as the initial habitat assessment described below.

A separate delineation report will be prepared that
describes the findings of the delineation and can be
submitted to USACE and RWQCB for their jurisdictional
determination. The report will include a delineation map, data sheets, and supplemental information to support the delineation analysis. The delineation will include all the information required by USACE and Water Board to make
a formal jurisdictional determination. As part of the report, the following information is required: a locality map; USGS quad sheet or copy with the project boundary outlined;
and a delineation map on an aerial or topographic base.

GHD will prepare the figures to support the delineation report.

Deliverables (all electronic PDFs):
− Draft and Final Aquatic Resources Delineation
GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 16

Page 472 of 750 ends

Task 8. Project Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) optional
The GHD team (featuring three State of California Qualified SWPPP Developers) will prepare a site-specific risk
assessment to determine risk level for the SWPPP. The risk level is a function of the erosive potential of the soil and receiving water body risk during periods of soil exposure.

Risk level 2 will require sampling of stormwater for pH and sediment, and significantly more effort than a Risk level 1 site. Risk level 3 sites may require bioassessment studies of the receiving water body, and active stormwater treatment systems. It is assumed the project will be a Risk level 2.

GHD will prepare the SWPPP document assuming the
project is Risk level 2. The SWPPP will include site maps and water pollution control drawings, a Construction Site Visual Monitoring Program, a Sampling and Analysis Plan for non- visible pollutants, a Sampling and Analysis Plan for pH and sediment, a Construction Site Non-Visible Pollutant Sampling Program, selection of appropriate BMPs for
Erosion and Sediment Control and for Construction Site
Management, and preparation of a partial water pollution control schedule (WPCS).

Other required documentation will be provided partially complete, such as the Rain Event Action Plan (REAP), site inspection forms, and contractor or material suppliers
notification forms. This documentation would be finalized following project bid. The project SWPPP will include
certifications for GHD’s SWPPP Developer.

GHD will provide Notice of Intent (NOI) information
suitable to initiate the waste discharge permit process using the State’s Stormwater Multiple Application and
Report Tracking System (SMARTS). GHD will also provide
assistance during the initial use of the SMARTS system via phone or email.

Deliverables:
− SWPPP document in electronic PDF format
Schedule
Please see our proposed project schedule on the following page.

GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 17

Page 473 of 750 ends

ea
te GREAT REDWOOD TRAIL PHASE 4
Enter Company Name in cell B2.

Enter the n
e
Di 1
lls 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 is
ro TASK START END M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S ll
B Consultant Selection 9/6/21 9/6/21
ll
B Council Award / Notice to Proceed 9/15/21 9/15/21
o
w Task 1: Project Management 9/16/21 3/25/22
Project Mangament 9/16/21 3/25/22
Kick of Meeting 9/28/21 9/28/21
Task 2: Review Existind Documents and Data 9/16/21 11/26/21 e
ce Task 3: Topographic Survey and Right of Way 9/16/21 10/15/21 R/W and Easement Research 9/16/21 9/22/21
Field Data Collection (topography, drainage, vegetation, etc.) 9/16/21 9/24/21 Develop Base Mapping (topography and R/W resolution) 9/27/21 10/14/21 Submit Topographic Survey and Right of Way Mapping 10/15/21 10/15/21 SamTask 4: Geotechnical Investigation and Report* 9/16/21 11/12/21 Geotechnical Field Investigatoin (drilling Permit and Drilling) 10/25/21 10/27/21 Laboratory Testing and Report 10/27/21 11/12/21
Submit Geotechnical Investigation Report 11/12/21 11/12/21 SamTask 5: Preliminary (30%) Design 9/16/21 10/18/18
Prepare 30% plans 10/18/21 12/3/21
30% Design Review Meeting 11/15/21 11/15/21
Revise 30% Plans and Develop Cost Estimate 11/16/21 12/3/21 Submitt to CPUC and NCRA for review 12/3/21 12/3/21
Task 6: Engineering Design 12/6/21 3/25/22
Prepare 60% Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate 12/6/21 12/31/21 Submit 60% Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate 12/31/21 12/31/21 City & NCRA Review of 60% Design 1/1/22 1/8/22
60% Design Review Meeting 1/9/22 1/9/22
Prepare 90% Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate 1/10/22 2/4/22 Submit 90% Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate 2/4/22 2/4/22 City & NCRA Review of 90% Design 2/7/22 2/14/22
90% Design Review Meeting 2/7/22 2/7/22
Prepare Final Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate 2/14/22 3/9/22 Submit Final Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate 3/10/22 3/10/22 Task 7: Resource Agency Permitting (optional) 12/6/21 3/25/22 Task 8: Stormwater pollution prevention plan 2/14/22 3/9/22 Project Start:

Display Week: Oct 4, 2021 Oct 11, 2021
Mon, 9/6/2021
Sep 6, 2021 Sep 13, 2021 Sep 20, 2021 Sep 27, 2021 Jan 3, 2022 * We anticipate permitting of the exploratory borings to take 2 weeks. Drilling will take place within one week of receipt of the drilling permit and should take no more than one day to complete. Laboratory testing would take about one week to complete. The geotechnical report will be issued within two weeks after completion of testing.

Oct 18, 2021 Oct 25, 2021 Nov 1, 2021 Nov 8, 2021 Nov 15, 2021 Nov 22, 2021 Nov 29, 2021 Dec 6, 2021 Dec 13, 2021 Dec 20, 2021 Dec 27, 2021 GHD City of Ukiah Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 18

Page 474 of 750 ends

GHD Inc. 2235 Mercury Way Suite 150 Santa Rosa CA 95407 USA T 1 707 523 1010 F 1 707 527 8679 E [email protected] W www.ghd.com September 2, 2021
City of Ukiah
Department of Public Works
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482-5400
Attn: Andrew Stricklin, Associate Engineer
RE: Fee Proposal for Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 – Specification No. 21-02 Dear Mr. Stricklin:

Thank you for the opportunity to propose our team’s qualifications to provide design services. Enclosed please find our team’s associated fee schedules for your consideration. GHD will perform these services on a Time and Materials Basis with a not-to-exceed amount of $312,491.

We welcome the opportunity to review our approach and other assumptions with you and are confident that we can come to a mutually beneficial agreement. As noted, GHD and our entire team are excited for the opportunity to help deliver this important project and look forward to working with you. If you have any questions about our qualifications or fees, please contact me at (707) 540-9687.

Sincerely,
GHD, Inc
Matt Kennedy, PE TE
Principal in Charge - Authorized Official

ATTACHMENT B

Page 475 of 750 ends

Fee Proposal For the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 - Specification No. 21-02 PROJECT NAME: City of Ukiah Northwester Pacific Rail Trail Phase 4 PROJECT NUMBER: 12557341 `
Date: 9/2/2021

LABOR COSTS
Firm--->
Employee---> Kennedy Tortora Schmal Daas Harvey Tortora Burns Gould Maddock Howard 2-man Crew Hummel Bohannon Penry Lee Guggiana Osorno Piper Varies Wolf Silva Hours Fee Role---> Principal Proj. Mngr.

Civil
Engineer Civil Engineer Storm Design
Civil
Drafter
Structural
Engr.

Structural
Designer
Land
Surveyor
Land
Surveyor Field Crew UAV Pilot
Survey
Tech Traffic Traffic Elec. Elec. Landscape Admin
Agency
Permitting QA/QC
Task Rate--> $255.00 $215.00 $215.00 $170.00 $195.00 $80.00 $195.00 $155.00 $155.00 $215.00 $305.00 $170.00 $100.00 $235.00 $215.00 $215.00 $155.00 $170.00 $135.00 $235.00 $275.00 Task1: Project Management 134 $29,770 $600 $5,166 $0 $35,536

1.1 Project Management and Coordination 6 40 46 $10,130 $0 $5,166 $0 $15,296

1.2 Project Meetings 4 16 4 4 12 8 8 8 64 $13,600 $0 $0 $0 $13,600

1.3 Quality Assurance / Quality Control 4 8 12 24 $6,040 $0 $0 $0 $6,040 Airfare 0 $0 $300 $0 $0 $300
Lodging (per Diem $200/person/day) 0 $0 $200 $0 $0 $200 Rental Car and Gas 0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100
Task 2: Review and Evaluate Existing Documents and Data Review and Evaluate Existing Documents and Data 22 $4,470 $0 $0 $0 $4,470

2.1 Review and Summary of Plans, Surveys, Records 4 4 4 2 2 4 2 22 $4,470 $0 $0 $0 $4,470 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Task 3: Topographic Survey and Right of Way 170 $27,550 $4,500 $0 $0 $32,050

3.1 Topographic Survey and ROW Field Work 8 2 12 30 52 $10,430 $0 $0 $0 $10,430

3.2 Topographic survey and ROW Mapping 2 2 4 20 12 30 48 118 $17,120 $0 $0 $0 $17,120 Equipment 0 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $2,500
Per Diem 0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000
Mileage 0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000
Task 4: Geotechnical Investigation and Report 14 $2,510 $0 $0 $26,166 $28,676

4.1 Geotechnical Analysis and Report 2 4 4 4 14 $2,510 $0 $0 $26,166 $28,676 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Task 5: Preliminary (30%) Design 266 $37,940 $950 $11,392 $0 $50,282

5.1 Drainage Study 4 12 40 16 72 $4,720 $0 $0 $0 $4,720

5.2 Preliminary Plans 2 16 24 40 32 8 8 8 2 8 8 2 158 $26,730 $0 $11,392 $0 $38,122

5.3 Preliminary Estimate 2 4 16 4 2 2 4 2 36 $6,490 $0 $0 $0 $6,490 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Airfare 0 $0 $400 $0 $0 $400
Lodging (per Diem $200/person/day) 0 $0 $400 $0 $0 $400 Rental Car and Gas 0 $0 $150 $0 $0 $150
Task 6: Engineering Design (60%, 90%, and final) 782 $118,960 $4,500 $38,018 $0 $161,478

6.1 60% Plans, Specs and Estimate 2 24 32 60 60 16 20 16 12 24 32 4 302 $46,610 $0 $13,081 $0 $59,691

6.2 90% Plans, Specs and Estimate 2 24 24 40 40 12 16 12 12 12 24 2 220 $34,720 $0 $10,283 $0 $45,003

6.3 100% (Final Bid Ready) Submittal 2 16 20 24 40 8 12 8 8 8 16 2 164 $25,180 $0 $7,517 $0 $32,697

6.4 Permitting and Agency Coordination 16 4 16 16 6 26 8 92 $11,590 $0 $0 $0 $11,590

6.5 Signage 2 2 4 $860 $0 $6,536 $0 $7,396
reproduction and copies 0 $0 $500 $150 $0 $650
Airfare 0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000
Lodging (per Diem $200/person/day) 0 $0 $2,000 $450 $0 $2,450 Rental Car and Gas 0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000
Task 7: Supporting Biological Resources Surveys and Studies (Optional) 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

7.1 Biological Resource Survey and Report 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

7.2 Sensitive Natural Community Mapping, and Habitat Assessment 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

7.3 Biological Resources Report 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

7.2 Aquatic Resources Delineation 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Task 8: Project Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) [Optional]

8.1 SWPPP 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL HOURS 22 176 136 208 40 204 50 60 30 14 12 60 48 32 62 46 56 82 12 16 22 SUBTOTAL FEE $5,610 $37,840 $29,240 $35,360 $6,800 $16,320 $9,750 $9,300 $4,650 $3,010 $3,660 $10,200 $4,800 $7,520 $14,570 $9,890 $8,680 $13,940 $1,620 $3,760 $6,050 0% MARKUP ON SUBS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TOTAL FEE $5,610 $37,840 $29,240 $35,360 $6,800 $16,320 $9,750 $9,300 $4,650 $3,010 $3,660 $10,200 $4,800 $7,520 $14,570 $9,890 $8,680 $13,940 $1,620 $3,760 $6,050 The fee presented above is an estimate. We welcome the opportunity to discuss the proposed scope and fee and we are open to negotiating any changes the City feels would better suit the project needs. 2642 $221,200 $312,491
GHD Inc Subtotals Subconsultant Total Fee
$54,575
Expenses
$10,550
Alta Planning +
design
Air Fair,
Lodging,
meals, and
rental car
Subconsultant
Crawford
$26,166

Page 476 of 750 ends

Deven Young,
Principal in ChargeBrian Burchfield, Project ManagerRyan Booth, Design AssociateCarmela Sambo, DesignerHoursMaterials Cost
$ 232 $ 183 $ 152 $ 97
Project Initiation and Management 5 16 4 0 25 $ 4,696
Project Kick Off 1 4 4 9 $ 1,572
Ongoing Project Management 4 12 16 $ 3,124
Preliminary (30%) Design 2 12 20 48 82 $ 10,356
2 12 20 48 82 $ 10,356
PS&E (60%, 90%, 100% Final) 4 42 54 116 216 $ 28,074
60 % Plans and Estimate 1 20 22 48 91 $ 11,892
90% Plans, Specifications and Estimate 1 12 20 40 73 $ 9,348 100% Final Plans, Specifications and Estimate 2 10 12 28 52 $ 6,834 Interpretive Signage 1 10 0 40 51 $ 5,942
1 10 40 51 $ 5,942
OPTIONAL TASK: Public Outreach $ -
$ -
TOTAL HOURS (not including optional tasks) 12 80 78 204 374 $ 49,068 ODC1 Travel Costs $ 250 $ 250
ODC2 Per Diem (Meals & Lodging) $ 200 $ 200
ODC7 Plotting, Printing Postage $ 150 $ 150
ODC8 $ -
ODC9 $ -
Estimated Salary Escalation $ -
$ -
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 600
TOTAL (not including optional tasks) $ 49,668
Alta Planning + Design COSTS
Ukiah Great Redwood Trail

DIRECT COSTS

Page 477 of 750 ends

Crawford Associates, Inc., 1100 Corporate Way, Suite 230, Sacramento, CA 95831 - (916) 455-4225 - www.crawford-inc.com Project Name:

Description:

County / City:

TASK CLASSIFICATION / SERVICES

HOURS /

QUANTITY RATE UNIT MULT SUBTOTAL TOTAL
TASK No. 1 - Field Preparation and Preliminary Review
Principal 2 $ 215.00 Hour 1 $ 430.00
Senior Project Manager 2 $ 180.00 Hour 1 $ 360.00
Project Manager 2 $ 175.00 Hour 1 $ 350.00
Senior Engineer 4 $ 155.00 Hour 1 $ 620.00
Project Engineer II 2 $ 145.00 Hour 1 $ 290.00
Project Engineer I 4 $ 135.00 Hour 1 $ 540.00
Staff Engineer 2 $ 115.00 Hour 1 $ 230.00
Administrative Assistant 2 $ 90.00 Hour 1 $ 180.00
Mileage (Site visit, USA Marking) 20 $ 0.60 Mile 1 $ 12.00 $ 3,012
TASK No. 2 - Subsurface Exploration and Sampling
Senior Engineer 4 $ 155.00 Hour 1 $ 620.00
Project Engineer I 19 $ 115.00 Hour 1 $ 2,185.00
Per Diem (Drilling) 2 $ 150.00 Day 1 $ 300.00
Mileage (Drilling) 320 $ 0.60 Mile 1 $ 192.00
Drilling Rig 1 $ 6,000.00 Day 1.15 $ 6,900.00
Steel Liners (MCAL/SPT) 16 $ 8.00 Each 1 $ 128.00
$ 10,325
TASK No. 3 - Laboratory Testing
Project Engineer I 1 $ 135.00 Hour 1 $ 135.00
#200 Wash 2 $ 135.00 Test 1 $ 270.00
Grain Size Analysis to #200 2 $ 135.00 Test 1 $ 270.00
Moisture & Density 4 $ 60.00 Test 1 $ 240.00
Plasticity Index 2 $ 250.00 Test 1 $ 500.00
R-Value 3 $ 250.00 Test 1 $ 750.00
1 $ 310.00 Test 1 $ 310.00
$ 2,475
TASK No. 4 - Geotechnical Report
Principal 1 $ 215.00 Hour 1 $ 215.00
Senior Project Manager 3 $ 180.00 Hour 1 $ 540.00
Project Manager 1 $ 175.00 Hour 1 $ 175.00
Senior Engineer 6 $ 155.00 Hour 1 $ 930.00
Project Engineer II 24 $ 145.00 Hour 1 $ 3,480.00
Project Engineer I 4 $ 135.00 Hour 1 $ 540.00
Staff Engineer 5 $ 115.00 Hour 1 $ 575.00
Administrative Assistant 2 $ 90.00 Hour 1 $ 180.00
$ 6,635
TASK No. 5 - Consultations and Design Team Support
Senior Project Manager 4 $ 180.00 Hour 1 $ 720.00
Senior Engineer 4 $ 155.00 Hour 1 $ 620.00
$ 1,340
CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES TOTAL $ 23,787.00
Chemical Analysis (pH, Sulfate, Chloride,
Redox Potential, Sulfate Reducing
Bacteria)
Proposal Date: August 24, 2021

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - COST PROPOSAL
Great Redwood Trail Phase 4
Ukiah, Mendocino County

Page 478 of 750 ends

Rate Rate
A01 Senior Technical Director 1 $275 C03 Senior Admin Officer 1 $155 A02 Senior Technical Director 2 $255 C04 Senior Admin Officer 2 $125 A03 Senior Technical Director 3 $235 C05 Admin Officer 1 $105 A04 Technical Director 1 $215 C06 Admin Officer 2 $90
A05 Technical Director 2 $195 C07 Admin Officer 3 $75
A06 Senior Professional 1 $170 D01 Business Services Manager 1 $275 A07 Senior Professional 2 $155 D02 Business Services Manager 2 $255 A08 Professional 1 $135 D03 Senior Admin Officer 1 $215 A09 Professional 2 $120 D04 Senior Admin Officer 2 $170 A10 Professional 3 $110 D05 Admin Officer 1 $155
A11 Intern $80 D06 Admin Officer 2 $110
B01 Lead Design Technician 1 $250 D07 Admin Officer 3 $100 B02 Lead Design Technician 2 $225 D08 Admin Officer 4 $90 B03 Lead Design Technician 3 $205 D09 Admin Officer 5 $85 B04 Senior Design Technician 1 $165 D10 Admin Officer 6 $75 B05 Senior Design Technician 2 $155 S01 Senior Construction Manager $250 B06 Design Technician 1 $145 S02 Construction Manager $205 B07 Design Technician 2 $130 S03 Lead Site Engineer/Supervisor $175 B08 Drafting/Design 1 $120 S06 Lead Inspector $165
B09 Drafting/Design 2 $110 S07 Senior Inspector $150
B10 Drafting/Design 3 $100 S08 Inspector / Specialist 1 $135 B11 Drafting/Design 4 $90 S09 Inspector / Specialist 2 $110 B12 Intern Drafting/Design $80 S10 Clerk / Specialist 3 $80 C01 Business Services Manager 1 $250 S15 Operator/Laborer 1 $125 C02 Business Services Manager 2 $210 S16 Operator/Laborer 2 $105 S17 Operator/Laborer 3 $95
1 2
3 4
a.General Associated Project Charges (APC): $6.50 / hour b.Environmental Department/Construction Inspector: $11.50 / hour c.Field Survey APC: $15.00 / hour
5 6
7 8 The Rate Schedule is subject to change annually (July 1st each year).

FY 2021 US West Region Rate Schedule
Reimbursement for direct expenses incurred for proposed services, including sub-consultant services, will be billed at cost plus 15%
The cost of using equipment and specialized supplies is billed on the basis of employee hours dedicated to the projects at the following rates
Reimbursement for vehicles used for proposed services will be at the federally approved mileage rates or at a negotiated monthly rate.

If prevailing wage are applicable, the above billing rates and APC will be adjusted proportionate to the increase in labor cost
Overtime for non-exempt employees will be charged at 1.5 times the hourly billing rate.

Finance Class Code Finance Class Code
Rates are for employees of all GHD compaines.

All travel cost will be invoiced at coach class rates. Lodging and meal expenses will be at cost unless per diem rate is negotiatied.

Page 479 of 750 ends

Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

Billing Rates ‐ 2021
Labor Category Rate Typical Classifications Included in Rate Labor Category 1a $335 Senior Principal
Labor Category 1b $283 Principal
Labor Category 1c $263 Principal
Labor Category 2 $232 Principal
Labor Category 3 $225 Principal, Senior Associate
Labor Category 4 $211 Principal, Senior Associate
Labor Category 5 $203 Principal, Senior Associate
Labor Category 6 $195 Principal, Senior Associate
Labor Category 7 $191 Principal, Senior Associate
Labor Category 8 $183 Senior Associate, Associate
Labor Category 9 $174 Senior Associate, Associate
Labor Category 10 $170 Senior Associate, Associate
Labor Category 11 $163 Associate, Senior
Labor Category 12 $152 Associate, Senior
Labor Category 13 $142 Associate, Senior
Labor Category 14 $130 Senior, Level I
Labor Category 15 $119 Senior, Level I
Labor Category 16 $109 Level I, Level II
Labor Category 17 $97 Level I, Level II
Labor Category 18 $82 Administration
Labor Category 19 $75 Intern
Rates are presented in US Dollars (US$) and are subject to change at any time.

Subconsultants and reimbursable expenses will be charged at cost + 10% markup.

Mileage will be charged at the provisional standard rate.

In‐house reproductions will be charged as follows:

Color copies $0.65/ page
Black and white copies $0.20/page
24” x 36” large format plot $17.50/sheet
36” x 48” large format plot $32.50/sheet

Page 480 of 750 ends

PROFESSIONAL TITLE RATE CONSTRUCTION/EQUIPMENT DETAIL RATE Principal $ 215.00 Traffic Control (Major) DBE or PW DAY $ 2,500.00 Senior Project Manager $ 180.00 Traffic Control Equipment (Minor) Non-DBE DAY $ 700.00 Project Manager $ 175.00 Seismic Refraction (12 Channel) DAY $ 1,200.00 Senior Geologist / Environmental $ 155.00 Core Machine with Generator DAY $ 2,500.00 Senior Engineer $ 155.00 Core Machine Bit INCH $ 3.00
Project Engineer II $ 145.00 Core Box EACH $ 17.25
Project Engineer I $ 135.00 Hot Mix Asphalt Patching (1st Core) FIRST $ 1,000.00 Staff Engineer $ 115.00 Hot Mix Asphalt Patching (2 or More) EACH AFTER $ 500.00 Administrative Assistant $ 90.00 Wildcat DCP Equipment DAY $ 750.00 Soils Technician (Prevailing Wage) ** $ 130.00 Wildcat DCP Tip EACH $ 15.00 Concrete Technician (Prevailing Wage) ** $ 120.00 Survey Equipment (Tripod, Level, Rod) DAY $ 150.00 Laborer Technician (Prevailing Wage) ** $ 110.00 Survey Equipment (Liquid Level) DAY $ 150.00 Percolation Equipment DAY $ 150.00
REIMBURSABLES Hand Auger DAY $ 150.00
Mileage $ 0.60 / Per Mile Backfill BAG $ 8.00
Outside Costs 15% Markup Steel Liners (MCAL/SPT) EACH $ 8.00 Permit Fees (City/County) 15% Markup Nuclear Density Test EACH $ 6.00 Per Diem (Lodging & Meals) County Rate CLASSIFICATION TESTING #200 Wash ASTM D1140 $ 110.00
Grain Size Analysis to #200 (Sieve Analysis) ASTM D6913 $ 150.00 EXTRAS Grain Size with Hydrometer ASTM D6913, D7928 $ 240.00 Rush Testing 50% Markup Hydrometer Analysis ASTM D7928 $ 175.00 (This guarantees your samples get top priority) Moisture & Density ASTM D2216, D7263 $ 60.00 Moisture Content ASTM D2216, CTM 226 $ 40.00
Non-Plastic Index Result ASTM D4318 $ 125.00
Plasticity Index ASTM D4318 $ 250.00

STRENGTH TESTING
California Impact CTM 216 $ 280.00
Compaction Curve (4" Mold) ASTM D698/D1557 $ 265.00
Compaction Curve (6" Mold) ASTM D698/D1557 $ 295.00
Compaction Curve Checkpoint (4" Mold) ASTM D698/D1557 $ 66.00 Compaction Curve Checkpoint (6" Mold) ASTM D698/D1557 $ 74.00 Compression (Rock) ASTM 7012 $ 275.00
Compressive Strength of Cylinders ASTM C39 $ 34.50
Direct Shear (CD 3pt) Peak Only ASTM D3080 $ 500.00
Point Load (Rock) ASTM D5731 $ 65.00
R-Value ASTM D2844, CAL 301 $ 350.00
Triaxial Shear-UU ASTM D2850 $ 165.00
Triaxial Staged-UU ASTM D2850 $ 265.00
Unconfined Compression (Rock) ASTM D7012 $ 225.00
Unconfined Compression (Soil) ASTM D2166 $ 165.00

CONSOLIDATION & EXPANSION
1-D Consolidation ASTM D2435 $ 300.00
1-D Consolidation (Time Rate) / Per Point ASTM D2435 $ 75.00 Expansion Index ASTM D4829 $ 210.00

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TESTING
pH & Resistivity CTM 643 $ 100.00
Sulfate Content CTM 417 $ 50.00
Chloride Content CTM 422 $ 50.00
Redox Potential and Sulfate Reducing Bacteria ASTM D1498 $ 110.00

PAVEMENT TESTING
Asphalt Ignition Calibration CTM 382 $ 345.00
Grain Size Analysis CTM 209 $ 150.00
Percent Asphalt Ignition Oven CTM 382 $ 145.00
Sand Equivalent CTM 217 $ 130.00
Stabilometer Value CTM 366 $ 200.00
Theoretical Max Specific Gravity/Density CTM 309 $ 200.00

SEISMIC ANALYSIS
EZ Frisk Site Specific Analysis PER PROJECT $ 1,500.00
Rates are applicable through Dec 31, 2021. An escalation factor of 3% per year may apply for work completed after 2021. 2021 PROFESSIONAL & LAB RATES
Corporate Office: 1100 Corporate Drive, Suite 230, Sacramento, CA 95831 - (916) 455-4225 Modesto: 1165 Scenic Drive, Suite B, Modesto, CA 95350 - (209) 312-7668 Pleasanton: 6200 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 330, Pleasanton, CA 94588 - (925) 401-3515 Rocklin: 4220 Rocklin Road, Suite 1, Rocklin, CA 95677 - (916) 455-4225 Ukiah: 100 North Pine Street, Ukiah, CA 95482 - (707) 240-4400

Page 481 of 750 ends

GHD - Rail Trail Phase 4 Design 2122-118
Final Audit Report 2021-10-14
Created: 2021-10-13
By: Kristine Lawler ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAinOYm1OWYsNWJCXhIVO154N8-wNmSzj7 "GHD - Rail Trail Phase 4 Design 2122-118" History
Document created by Kristine Lawler ([email protected]) 2021-10-13 - 8:08:58 PM GMT- IP address: 12.12.163.2
Document emailed to MARY HORGER ([email protected]) for approval 2021-10-13 - 8:09:52 PM GMT
Email viewed by MARY HORGER ([email protected])
2021-10-13 - 8:10:49 PM GMT- IP address: 23.134.144.248 Document approved by MARY HORGER ([email protected]) Approval Date: 2021-10-13 - 8:11:02 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 23.134.144.248 Document emailed to Darcy Vaughn ([email protected]) and David Rapport ([email protected]) for approval. One of them to approve 2021-10-13 - 8:11:04 PM GMT
Email viewed by Darcy Vaughn ([email protected]) 2021-10-13 - 10:25:58 PM GMT- IP address: 73.223.12.193 Document approved by Darcy Vaughn ([email protected]) Approval Date: 2021-10-13 - 10:31:08 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 73.223.12.193 Document emailed to Sheri Mannion ([email protected]) for approval 2021-10-13 - 10:31:10 PM GMT
Email viewed by Sheri Mannion ([email protected]) 2021-10-14 - 4:24:54 PM GMT- IP address: 76.102.207.5
Document approved by Sheri Mannion ([email protected]) Approval Date: 2021-10-14 - 4:25:02 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 76.102.207.5 Document emailed to Sage Sangiacomo ([email protected]) for signature 2021-10-14 - 4:25:07 PM GMT

Page 482 of 750 ends

Document e-signed by Sage Sangiacomo ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2021-10-14 - 6:12:17 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 12.12.163.2 Document emailed to Kristine Lawler ([email protected]) for signature 2021-10-14 - 6:12:20 PM GMT
Email viewed by Kristine Lawler ([email protected]) 2021-10-14 - 6:20:04 PM GMT- IP address: 66.249.84.207
Document e-signed by Kristine Lawler ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2021-10-14 - 6:20:22 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 12.12.163.2 Agreement completed.
2021-10-14 - 6:20:22 PM GMT

Page 483 of 750 ends

CITY OF UKIAH
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT 2122118

BETWEEN
GHD INC and THE CITY OF UKIAH
This Amendment No. 1, entered on March 16, 2022, revises the Agreement for Consulting Services for preparing the plans, specifications and estimate for the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 (GRT 4) Project dated October 13, 2021 between the City of Ukiah and GHD Inc, as follows.

1. Add additional environmental studies and permitting to the Scope of Work, per attached Exhibit 1.

2. Revising the guaranteed maximum dollar amount by an additional $49,818 for professional consulting services related to the design of the GRT 4, for a revised, total contract amount not-to-exceed $362,309
Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all other terms remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AMENDMENT ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE:

GHD INC
BY: DATE:

PRINT NAME:

CITY OF UKIAH
BY: DATE:

SAGE SANGIACOMO, CITY MANAGER
ATTEST
BY: DATE:

KRISTINE LAWLER, CITY CLERK
March 25, 2022 Matthew G. Kennedy
COU No. 2122-118-A1
Apr 1, 2022 Kristine Lawler (Apr 1, 2022 09:16 PDT)
Kristine Lawler Apr 1, 2022
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 484 of 750 ends

The Power of Commitment
GHD Inc. 12557341
City of Ukiah Ref: COU No. 2122118
Our ref: 12557341
February 17, 2022
Tim Eriksen
Public Works Director / City Engineer
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
RE: Great Redwood Trail Phase 4, Environmental Studies and Permitting Dear Mr. Eriksen,
The City of Ukiah is currently in the planning phase to construct Phase 4 of the Great Redwood Trail. The Phase 4 Trail is approximately 1.9 miles long and may impact jurisdictional aquatic features including swales and culvert crossings.

Based on our current understanding of the project, it is assumed that permits from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and United States Army Corps of Engineers may be required in order to construct the project. This scope of work is provided to prepare field work and technical studies to determine potential habitat and aquatic features, necessary permit applications, and subsequent coordination with the regulatory agencies.

Task 7A: Environmental Fieldwork and Studies
Biological Resources Memo
GHD will prepare a Biological Resources Memo to support the permit applications. The memo will summarize the potential for special status plants and wildlife, habitats, and Sensitive Natural Communities to occur within the project area. The memo will compile data found during database surveys described above as well as any available maps, databases, literature specific to local ecology, and any additional information from the client pertaining to the site shall be reviewed. Recommendations for further actions or mitigation measures to protect biological resources during project implementation will conclude the memo.

Aquatic Resources Delineation
GHD, in coordination with Jane Valerius Environmental Consulting, will conduct a delineation of potential wetlands and waters of the United States and/or State in accordance with the USACE 1987 manual, the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Supplement, the 2020 Navigable Waters Protection Rule and the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board on April 2, 2019. Field work for the delineation will be conducted on the same day as the initial habitat assessment described below.

A delineation report will be prepared that describes the findings of the delineation and can be submitted to USACE for jurisdictional determination. The report will include a delineation map, data sheets, and supplemental information to support the delineation analysis. The delineation will include all the information required by USACE and Water Board to make a formal jurisdictional determination. As part of the report, the following information is required: a locality map; USGS quad sheet or copy with the project boundary outlined; and a delineation map on an aerial or topographic base. GHD will prepare the figures to support the delineation report.

TASK 7B: Environmental Permitting
CDFW - 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement
GHD will prepare a draft Streambed Alteration Agreement application in accordance with Fish and Wildlife Code Section 1602. CDFW requires a Streambed Alteration Agreement for projects with the potential to adversely affect existing fish or wildlife resources. The draft application will be submitted to the City for review and comment. GHD will incorporate comments received into the final application and complete the EXHIBIT 1

Page 485 of 750 ends

12557341 | Proposal for Environmental Studies and Permitting 2 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement application package for online submittal to CDFW. If the City does not yet have an online Environmental Permit Information Management System (EPIMS) account, GHD will guide the County through the registration process. All application materials will be submitted to CDFW through their online EPIMS Portal and GHD will coordinate with the local agent assigned to the project. It is anticipated that this agency coordination will continue throughout the permitting process.

RWQCB - 401 Water Quality Certification
GHD will prepare a draft CWA Section 401 Permit (Water Quality Certification) application pursuant to the requirements of the North Coast RWQCB for projects that may impact Waters of the State. The draft permit application will be submitted to the City for review and comment. Following incorporation of all comments by the City, the application package will be submitted to the North Coast RWQCB. GHD will coordinate closely with the RWQCB regional office throughout the permitting submittal process.

USACE - 404 Nationwide Permit
GHD will prepare a CWA Section 404 Nationwide permit application to be submitted to the USACE as required for projects with the potential to impact federal Waters. A draft CWA 404 NWP permit application will be prepared pursuant to the requirements for a Section 404 Army Permit (33 CFR Part 323). It is anticipated that NWP 14, for linear transportation, will best apply to the project; however, that will be confirmed with USACE staff once the project is initiated during pre-application coordination with the agency.

Following incorporation of comments by the City, GHD will revise the draft application into a final submittal package.

TASK 7 DELIVERABLES
• Draft and Final Wetland Delineation (Electronic Format) • Draft and Final Biological Resources Memo (Electronic Format) • Draft and Final Permit Applications (Electronic Format)

GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS/EXCLUDED SERVICES
This proposal is based on the following assumptions. Additional budget may be required for services beyond the estimated level of effort in this proposal:
• The City shall pay all permitting fees.
• Formal Section 7 Consultation will not be required.
• All impacts along the alignment would be addressed in one application package to each agency. • A 404 (b) (1) alternatives analysis will not be required. • A formal revegetation plan or mitigation plan will not be required.

FEE ESTIMATE
The estimated fee for professional services is $49,818. See attachment for breakdown of the estimated fee.

The field work is scheduled for tomorrow February 18, 2022. GHD will follow up with a schedule on the studies and permitting (if required) once field work is completed. Please forward the amendment to Patrick Tortora and we will have signed and executed.

If you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal, please feel free to call me at 503-505- 0117.

Sincerely,
GHD Inc.

Patrick Tortora, PE
Project Manager
Cc: Kristine Gaspar, Matt Kennedy, PE, Principal
Attachment: Fee Estimate

Page 486 of 750 ends

PROJECT NAME: Great Redwood Trail Phse 4 Project - Environmental Studies and Permitting Principal Project
Engineer
Environmental
Lead CADD Env. Planner / Biologist GIS/Graphics
Task 7 Environmental Support $250 $215 $225 $155 $160 $120 Task 7a - Environmental Fieldwork and Studies
Prep and Field Work 1 2 4 16 8 31 $5,100 $600 $5,700
Biological Resources Memo 4 40 4 48 $7,780 $7,780
Wetland Delineation 4 4 6 14 $2,260 $3,225 $323 $3,548 $5,808 Task 7a Subtotal Hours 1 2 12 0 60 18 93
Task 7a Subtotal Fee $ 250 $430 $2,700 $0 $9,600 $2,160 $0 $15,140 $19,288 Task 7b - Environmental Permitting
CDFW Streambed Alteration Agreement 1 4 6 4 48 2 65 $11,000 $11,000 RWQCB 401 Certification 1 4 6 4 48 2 65 $11,000 $11,000 USACE 404 Nationwide Permit 1 2 4 2 40 2 51 $8,530 $8,530 Task 7b Subtotal Hours 3 10 16 10 136 6 181
Task 7b Subtotal Fee $ 750 $2,150 $3,600 $1,550 $21,760 $720 $0 $30,530 $30,530 TOTAL HOURS TASK 7 4 12 28 10 196 24 274
TOTAL FEE TASK 7 $45,670 $49,818

PROJECT ESTIMATING SHEET
Total
Fee
Date: 2/17/2022
Subconsultants
Valerius Markup
10%
Sub Total or
Expense Fee Indirect Costs Hours
GHD

Page 487 of 750 ends

CITY OF UKIAH
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT 2122118

BETWEEN
GHD INC and THE CITY OF UKIAH
This Amendment No. 1, entered on January 19, 2023, revises the Agreement for Consulting Services for preparing the plans, specifications and estimate for the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4 ( GRT 4) Project dated October 13, 2021 between the City of Ukiah and GHD Inc, as follows.

1. Add additional environmental studies and permitting to the Scope of Work, per attached Exhibit 1.

2. Revising the guaranteed maximum dollar amount by an additional $ 61,958. 00 for professional consulting services related to the design of the GRT 4, for a revised, total contract amount not- to-exceed $ 424, 267.00
Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all other terms remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AMENDMENT ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE:

GHD INC
BY: DATE:

PRINT NAME:

CITY OF UKIAH
BY: DATE:

SAGE SANGIACOMO, CITY MANAGER
ATTEST
BY: DATE:

KRISTINE LAWLER, CITY CLERK
Matthew G. Kennedy, PE
January 20, 2023
COU No. 2122- 118-A2
Jan 27, 2023
Kristine Lawler ( Jan 27, 2023 08:51 PST)
Kristine Lawler Jan 27, 2023
ATTACHMENT 3

Page 488 of 750 ends

The Power of Commitment
GHD Inc. 12557341
City of Ukiah Ref: COU No. 2122118
Our ref: 12557341
November 7, 2022
Tim Eriksen
Public Works Director / City Engineer
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
RE: Great Redwood Trail Phase 4: Amendment No. 2 for Additional Design and Environmental Services
Dear Mr. Eriksen:

This letter proposal is submitted based on our additional efforts to complete the project and address changes to the design which resulted from the alignment of the trail shifting from being located along the centerline of the tracks as originally proposed to being offset to the east of the tracks. The decision to shift the alignment to the east side of the tracks was based on the City’ s concern should railbanking not be approved by the California Utilities Commission ( CUC).

The result of shifting the trail to the east of the tracks introduced a number of additional design and environmental requirements. These issues are generally related to grading, drainage, structural, tree removal and wetlands. These issues are interwoven with the environmental and resource agency permitting. Addressing environmental and resource agency permitting was added to the project by Amendment No. 1, but coordination efforts and requirements from the resource agencies have been greater than anticipated.

Below is a summary of the tasks and efforts we have that are in addition to the original approach, scope of work and the amendment for environmental and permitting:

1. Bridge and Abutment Designs: The Scope of Work assumed the existing bridges and foundations could be reused with minor modifications for the trail, such as replacing the decks. o Shifting the trail to the east of the tracks meant designing two new bridges, including efforts to coordinate the bridge foundations and related grading with existing nearby utilities.

2. Retaining Wall Designs: The Scope of Work assumed no new retaining walls would be required since the alignment was to be on the track alignment.
o Shifting the trail to the east of the tracks meant designing cast- in-place concrete and mechanically stabilized earth ( MSE) retaining walls as part of the trail cut/ fill grading.

3. Parking Lot Design at the Animal Shelter. Design “ off- site improvements” would not have been needed if the trail alignment was along the rail alignment. o Shifting the trail to the east of the tracks impacted the parking lot at the animal shelter on Plant Road. The design includes demolition of the existing parking lot, and new paving and parking layout to accommodate the trail to the east of the tracks.

4. Impact analysis for moving the trail back on the rail o We did an analysis and cost estimate for this scenario, but it was abandoned and we returned to the current alignment

5. Earthwork and Grading Design: Design of grading, cuts and fills was expected to be minimal with the trail alignment along the tracks. Some minor fill was expected to address the proposed width of the trail and shoulders.
o Shifting the trail east of the tracks resulted in significant additional design efforts related to grading, trail profile, trail alignment, and earth retaining systems ( previously summarized).

This effort included:

Design of trail alignment offset from track centerline.

Design of new cuts and fills for a smooth trail profile.

EXHIBIT 1

Page 489 of 750 ends

12557341 | Proposal for Environmental Studies and Permitting 2 Designing to minimize/ balance the earthwork ( cuts and fills).

Designing to avoid mapped wetlands ( to the extent possible/ practical)

6. Additional Environmental and Permitting:
o Amendment 1 assumed no field review meetings with resource agencies would be needed.

We attempted to consolidate these to one site visit for both RWQCB and CDFW, but it didn’ t work with the agencies’ schedules. To date we have coordinated and attended two field meetings for wetlands with the RWQCB and CDFW. Additional coordination efforts and confirmation of mitigation is still expected. It’s possible that USACE may also ask for a site visit.
o In February 2022, when Amendment 1 for environmental support was submitted to the City, a federal district court had in the fall of 2021 rescinded the Trump- era Pre-filing Rule for Water Quality Certifications with the Regional Board. In April 2022, after the Amendment was approved, the Supreme Court struck down the District Courts ruling thus re-instating the Pre-filing Rule. GHD’ s scope of work did not include support for the Pre-filing process which we are currently navigating with the RWQCB.

7. Wetland Mitigation Design: Wetlands will be impacted by the trail alignment east of the tracks, and design of wetland mitigation measures was not included in the original Scope of Work or Amendment 1.
o We assumed mitigation in the form of enhancement and restoration would suffice. While proposed enhancement and restoration has been deemed acceptable for the fill impacts to Waters, the RWQCB has requested creation of new wetland areas for the impacts to existing wetlands.
o GHD prepared wetland mitigation design along the west side of the rail, including new wetland grading, detailing, specifying seed mix, etc.
o The culvert extensions have triggered more detailed permit review by the CDFW, resulting in more coordination and design efforts.

8. Tree Impacts: Few to no impacts to existing trees were expected when the trail was on the rail alignment.
o Moving the trail alignment east of the tracks required that additional detailing in accounting of tree impacts and protection measures and reflecting them on the plans.

9. Base and Alternate Bids: Development of base and additive/ deductive bid alternates was not included in the Scope of Work. Shifting the trail alignment east of the tracks has increased the cost of the project.
o The City requested GHD formulate the bid to specify a base bid from Commerce Drive south to Norgard Lane, and an additive bid alternate from Norgard Lane south to Plant Road. The segment of trail south of Plant Road was removed from the project due to cost.

This effort included creating a base and additive bid alternate schedule and adding notes and callouts to the plans to indicate the limit of base and alternate bid item work.

10. Landscape Redesign: Alta Planning + Design needed to redesign areas of landscaping to address waters mitigation requirements that were discovered after the jurisdictional delineation effort associated with Amendment 1. Planting locations and species choices had to be adjusted to balance both the needs of the grant as well as waters enhancement mitigation.

11. Revise Permit Applications: The initial draft applications included the original 1.9-mile trail segment.

This was later revised after the portion of the project south of Plant Road was removed. GHD went back through the applications to remove references to that portion of the proposed trail south of Plant Road.

The design is essentially complete, pending any comments from the City. Work remaining to finalize the bid package includes additional resource agency coordination and permitting, bridge and culvert hydraulic analysis and finalizing the design, finalizing the base and alternate bid items, and finalizing the technical specifications, bid schedules and bid package. Per City direction, this amendment request does not include the additional hydraulics analysis required for the bridge design due to the 100- yr floodplain. If the bid alternate is awarded to the Contractor GHD will need additional approval from the City to proceed with the hydraulic analysis prior to construction.

FEE ESTIMATE

Page 490 of 750 ends

12557341 | Proposal for Environmental Studies and Permitting 3 The Amendment 2 budget is attached, which covers our current budget overrun of approximately $ 52,000, and finalize the design for bidding. GHD proposes a time- and-materials fee not to exceed $ 61,958 without written authorization from the City. See attachment for breakdown of the estimated fee. We appreciate the City’ s consideration of this proposal and are very motivated to complete the design so the City can prepare the project for bid advertisement. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
GHD Inc.

Erik Fanselau, PE
Project Manager
Cc: Kristine Gaspar, Matt Kennedy, PE, Principal
Attachment: Fee Estimate
Attachments:

1. GHD Amendment 2 Fee Proposal

Page 491 of 750 ends

Attachment 1
Project Name: Great Redwood Trail Phase 4: Amendment 2 Client: City of Ukiah Prepared by: Matt Kennedy Date:

Job Number: 12557341
LABOR CATEGORY > Proj. Proj. Civil H/H Struct. PW Field Surveyor Env Staff CAD WP PA TOTAL Sub- TOTAL Prncpl Mngr. Eng. Eng. Eng. Survey Scientist Env Designer HOURS conRATE >$ 315 $ 235 $ 195 $ 195 $ 190 $ 225 $ 195 $ 235 $ 158 $ 195 $ 135 $ 135 sultant( s) FEE Task / Item / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr / Hr AMENDMENT 2 TASKS

1. Bridge and Abutment Design 1 4 50 8 63 $ 409. 50 $ 12,564. 50

2. Retaining Wall Design 1 4 50 8 63 $ 409. 50 $ 12,564. 50

3. Parking Lot Design 6 16 22 $ 143. 00 $ 4,433. 00

4. Impact Analysis - Trail Alignment Shift 2 4 6 $ 39. 00 $ 1,289. 00

5. Earthwork and Grading Design 1 20 20 41 $ 266. 50 $ 8,381. 50

6. Additional Environmental & Permitting 32 32 64 $ 416. 00 $ 12,992. 00

7. Wetland Mitigation Design 8 2 6 16 $ 104. 00 $ 3,304. 00

8. Tree Impacts 2 2 2 6 $ 39. 00 $ 1,289. 00

9. Bid Alternate 1 2 2 1 6 $ 39. 00 $ 1,409. 00
4 4 $ 26. 00 $ 966. 00
6 8 14 $ 91. 00 $ 2,765. 00
4 4 50 0 100 0 0 46 40 61 0 0 305 $ 1,982. 50 $ 0.00 $ 61, 957. 50 4 4 50 0 100 0 0 46 40 61 0 0 305 $ 1,982.50 $ 0.00 $ 61,957.50 OTHER DIRECT COSTS include printing, photocopies, shipping, vehicle mileage and other miscellaneous direct expenses.

SUBTOTAL AMENDMENT 2 TASKS

PROJECT TOTALS

11. Revise Permit Applications

GHD - PROJECT FEE ESTIMATING SHEET
November 7, 2022

LABOR COSTS FEE COMPUTATION
OTHER
DIRECT
COSTS

10. Landscape Redsign
11/7/2022 Page 1

Page 492 of 750 ends

The Power of Commitment
GHD Inc. 12557341
City of Ukiah Ref: COU No. 2122118
Our ref: 12557341
March 27, 2024
Andrew Stricklin
Project Manager
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
RE: Great Redwood Trail Phase 4: Amendment No. 3 for Additional Design and Environmental Services
Dear Mr. Stricklin:

This amendment proposal is submitted based on our additional efforts to complete the project and address changes to the design after our 100% design submittal in September 2022. Based on our recent discussions, it appears that due to unforeseen circumstances the project may be terminated without going to construction. We have exceeded our original budget but had refrained from submitting an amendment request due to feedback from the City that a significant redesign of the project to move the trail back on to the track alignment may occur which would have required an amendment. GHD is still prepared to support the City with this project if it moves forward for design revisions or construction.

Below is a summary of the tasks and efforts we have incurred in addition to the original contract Scope of Work and the previous amendment request:

1. Project Management
Additional project management support was provided for the tasks listed below. This included ongoing coordination and communication as well as project budget management and invoicing.

Cost: $1,581.60
Approximate Hours: 7.4 hours
Rate: $215/hr

2. Civil Design Changes:

This work primarily consists of the labor to revise the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate to add the irrigation water storage tanks along the trail requested by the City. This also included research to find a suitable tank solution for the project and structural design coordination for the tank placement.

Cost: $3,734.80
Approximate Hours: 20 hours
Rate: $215-$155/hr

3. Additional Environmental Coordination and Permitting:

Additional work was required at the request of the permitting agencies: USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB. GHD attended three additional field meetings with permitting agency staff as part of the permit review process.

This effort was not anticipated based on our prior experience with these same agencies on similar projects.

In addition, several updates to the permit packages were made when the agencies did not agree with the proposed mitigation strategy, resulting in unexpected changes in design and subsequent resubmittals to the permitting agencies. This included revisions to the civil grading design in the wetland impacted areas because the agencies chose to use a more conservative interpretation of the wetland criteria. Grading was changed to maintain a specific area to encourage ponding and wetland generation to mitigate impacts. At the City’s request, we also investigated a potential spring located along the trail alignment.

Cost: $7826.86
Approximate Hours: 41 hours
Rate: $215-$120/hr
ATTACHMENT 4

Page 493 of 750 ends

12557341 | Proposal for Environmental Studies and Permitting 2

4. Electrical Coordination
This work primarily consisted of the coordination, initiated by PG&E, after the 100% submittal regarding the service application for the street light service at Norgard Lane. This included a site visit and additional application coordination.

Cost: $816.25
Approximate Hours: 5.75 hours
Rate: $155-$80/hr

5. Project Redesign Cost Estimate
At the City’s request, in February 2023, GHD prepared a rough cost estimate to determine what the approximate redesign cost would be to shift the trail alignment back on to the track.

Cost: $1720.00
Approximate Hours: 8 hours
Rate: $215/hr
Total Fee Requested: $15,679.51
We welcome the opportunity to continue supporting the City on this important project. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding our request.

Sincerely,
Erik Fanselau, PE, CFM, LEED AP
Project Manager

Page 494 of 750 ends

The Power of Commitment
GHD Inc. 12557341
City of Ukiah Ref: COU No. 2122118
Our ref: 12557341
April 26, 2024
Andrew Stricklin
Project Manager
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
RE: Great Redwood Trail Phase 4: Amendment No. 4 for Additional Environmental Services During Construction
Dear Mr. Stricklin:

This amendment proposal is submitted based on your request to provide environmental support for the construction phase of the project. Below is a summary of the additional pre-construction, construction and post-construction period tasks and efforts requested by the City:

1. Project Management
Additional project management support will be required for the tasks listed below. This includes ongoing coordination and communication as well as project budget management and invoicing.

Cost: $2096.00
Approximate Hours: 8 hours

2. Pre-construction Bird Nesting Surveys
If vegetation removal (e.g., clearing and grubbing) or other project-related activities must occur during the nesting season (typically March 1 to August 31), a qualified Biologist will need to survey for active bird nests within seven (7) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities. If needed, surveys will begin in the early morning and continue until vegetation, nesting behavior, and nests have been sufficiently observed. A report of the survey will be submitted to CDFW by email within three (3) business days of survey completion. The report will include:
• Description of the area surveyed;
• Time and date of surveys;
• Ambient conditions;
• Species observed;
• Active nests observed, if any, and evidence of breeding behaviors (e.g., courtship, carrying nesting material or food, etc.); and
• Description of any outstanding conditions that may have impacted survey results (e.g., weather conditions, excess noise, predators present, etc.).

If an active nest is found, avoidance measures will be provided to the City and its Contractor. If a lapse in project-related work of seven (7) days or longer occurs, the survey is required to be repeated before project work can resume.

Task 2 Assumptions and Exclusions
• There will be no lapse in construction (more than 7 days), necessitating new surveys be complete. • No nests will be found requiring long-term monitoring. If nests are found, it is assumed the areas can be avoided until the nesting season has ended.

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 495 of 750 ends

12557341 | Proposal for Environmental Studies and Permitting 2 • If active nests are found that require monitoring, an amendment can be provided to the City. • GHD will receive notification within a minimum of 15 working days of the start of construction, to therefore schedule the requisite survey within 7 days of the start of construction.

Cost: $6946.72
Approximate Hours: 30 hours

3. Relocate Stranded Aquatic Life (Water D5)
A GHD biologist will relocate, if necessary, any stranded aquatic life at Water D5 where water diversion/dewatering is anticipated. All other stream and culvert crossings are assumed to be done when the channel is dry. A GHD biologist will remove and relocate all aquatic lifeforms encountered in isolated portions of Water D5 to the greatest extent practicable prior to dewatering and all reasonable efforts will be made to capture and move any remaining stranded aquatic lifeforms observed in the dewatered area.

Capture methods may include hand nets, dip nets, buckets, seins, and/or by hand. Captured aquatic life will be released immediately in the closest suitable aquatic habitat adjacent to the work site. Information will be prepared detailing species that were stranded and relocated within the Project Inspection Report that is to be prepared for the stream crossings.

Task 3 Assumptions and Exclusions
• Dewatering and diversion activities will occur once and thus require only one site visit. Any relocation of stranded aquatic life can occur within the same site visit. • Only Waters D4 will require clearing. All other culvert extension and stream crossings will occur when flow is non-existent.
• GHD will receive notification within a minimum of 10 working days of the dewatering activity.

Cost: $4248.72
Approximate Hours: 18 hours

4. Pre/Post Construction Wetland Mapping
GHD will confirm the extent of wetlands on the east side of the tracks (previously mapped), south of Water D3, and will add the wetlands west of the track to our existing wetland site conditions mapping. Wetlands on the east side will be filled as part of construction and wetlands on both sides are to be enlarged and restored (debris, barrier removal on the west side). Therefore, post constructing mapping will be conducted to set a baseline for the subsequent monitoring required by the agencies.

Task 4 Assumptions and Exclusions
• Post-construction wetlands will conform to plans.
• GHD will receive notification within a minimum of 15 working days of the start of construction.

Cost: $10,252.94
Approximate Hours: 47 hours

5. Pre/Post Construction Permit Paperwork
US Army Corps (NWP 14), North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (401 Water Certification), and CDFW (Streambed Alteration Agreement), all have requirements for filing notification before and after construction. This task includes:

Page 496 of 750 ends

12557341 | Proposal for Environmental Studies and Permitting 3 • Upload Project information to EcoAtlas using Project Tracker Form. Required information includes a Project map and Mitigation Monitoring Reports (see Task 5) (per 401 Water Cert). • Notice of Work Initiation (per SAA)
• Project Inspection Report, including photos and aquatic species relocation information (per SAA) • Notice of Completed Work with Supplemental photos (per SAA). • Notification of Project Completion (per 401 Water Cert) • Certification of Compliance for Nationwide Permit (per NWP 14) Cost: $9551.50
Approximate Hours: 43 hours

6. Meetings, Contractor RFIs, and Scheduling
GHD has included attendance at up to 8 City/Contractor Team meetings and up to 20 hours to respond to Contract RFIs related to environmental questions. This task also includes time for scheduling site visits and coordinating with the City and Contractor on the above tasks.

Task 6 Assumptions and Exclusions
• Construction will last no more than 6 months.
• GHD will not be required to attend any more than 8 City-Contractor meetings. • Environmental related RFIs will not take any more than 20 hours to respond.

Cost: $14,860.00
Approximate Hours: 64 hours
Total Time-and-Materials Fee Requested: $47,955.88
We welcome the opportunity to continue supporting the City on this important project. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding our proposal.

Sincerely,
Erik Fanselau, PE, CFM, LEED AP
Project Manager

Page 497 of 750 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item No: 13.e.

MEETING DATE/TIME: 5/15/2024

ITEM NO: 2024-194

AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Receive Report of Contract for Five Year Environmental Monitoring Services by GHD Engineers for the Great Redwood Trail, in the Amount of $35,173.50, and Approve a Corresponding Budget Amendment DEPARTMENT: Public Works PREPARED BY: Seth Strader, Administrative Analyst PRESENTER: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works
ATTACHMENTS:

1. 5 Year Monitoring Proposal
Summary: The City Council will receive a report of contract with GHD Inc for environmental monitoring services for the Great Redwood Trail Phase 4,and consider approving a corresponding budget amendment.

Background: Like with previous phases of the Great Redwood Trail, Phase 4 will require extensive environmental and wildlife monitoring services as part of the permitting process with state agencies. Such services include notification of project initiation and completion, biological surveys, annual mitigation reports etc. The need for these services is dependent on the approval of the award for bid to Granite Construction and continued construction of the Great Redwood Trail.

Discussion: The mitigation and monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted annually for five years following the mitigation implementation report. The report will include the riparian trees planted and the temporarily impacted wetland areas. Each report will include a list of all plantings, prior year's monitoring report, monitoring methods, data, photographs and recommendations for adaptive measures.

This additional environmental monitoring cost is not planned to be reimbursed through the Urban Greening Grant, which is funding the majority of the design and construction costs related to Phase 4 of the Great Redwood Trail. Staff is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $19,616 from the general fund to supplement the existing engineering contracted services budget to acquire GHD Inc. for their environmental monitoring services for 5 years in the total amount not to exceed $35,173.50. Please see Attachment 1 for a proposal for their services.

Recommended Action: Receive report of contract and approve corresponding budget amendment.

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: YES
CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 10024210.52100.18253: $15,558
PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: 10024210.52100.18253: $19,616
FINANCING SOURCE: General Fund Reserves
PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.:

COORDINATED WITH: Tim Eriksen, Director of Public Works; Andrew Stricklin, Senior Engineer DIVERSITY-EQUITY INITIATIVES (DEI): Goal 5 – Instill diversity, equity, and inclusion as essential core elements of policy-making, accountability, and delivery of City services.

GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS (GP):

Page 498 of 750 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 499 of 750 ends

The Power of Commitment
GHD Inc. 12557341
April 26, 2024
Andrew Stricklin
Project Manager
City of Ukiah
300 Seminary Avenue
Ukiah, CA 95482
RE: Great Redwood Trail Phase 4: Wetland and Tree Mitigation and Monitoring Dear Mr. Stricklin:

This proposal is submitted based on your request to provide environmental support for the construction phase of the project. Below is a summary of the additional pre-construction, construction and postconstruction period tasks and efforts requested by the City:

1. Project Management
Additional project management support will be required for the task listed below. This includes ongoing coordination and communication as well as project budget management and invoicing.

Cost: $1471.00
Approximate Hours: 6 hours

2. Wetland and Tree Mitigation and Monitoring (5 years) Mitigation and monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted annually for five years following mitigation implementation (Report). The Report will include the riparian trees to planted at Water D1 and Water D5 and the temporarily impacted wetlands and mitigation wetlands in the vicinity of Water D3. The wetland areas are anticipated to meet success criteria in 1 to 2 years. The trees, however, will require monitoring for 5 years. Annual reports will be submitted to the Regional Water Board by January 31 of each year following construction. Reports shall include:
• Year 1 report will include as-built plans for all plantings; • Prior year monitoring results.
• Maintenance activities performed;
• Monitoring methods;
• Monitoring data summarized;
• Time-series photographs;
• Annual performance and whether success criteria are met; • Recommendations for adaptive measures.

Task 2 Assumptions and Exclusions
• Wetland restoration areas will meet success criteria within 2 years. • City is responsible for watering, maintaining, and replanting trees and shrubs. • Monitoring will only be necessary once per year and will cease after 5 years.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 500 of 750 ends

12557341 | Proposal for Environmental Studies and Permitting 2 • Tree survival will meet the success criteria established in the permits. If any trees are required to be replanted, the monitoring timeframe is re-set to start over at 5 years.

Cost: $33,702.50
Approximate Hours: 163 hours
Total Time-and-Materials Fee Requested: $35,173.50
We welcome the opportunity to continue supporting the City on this important project. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding our proposal.

Sincerely,
Erik Fanselau, PE, CFM, LEED AP
Project Manager

Page 501 of 750 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item No: 14.a.

MEETING DATE/TIME: 5/15/2024

ITEM NO: 2024-161

AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Riverside Park Regeneration Project, Specification 24-05, and Direct Staff to Advertise Bids.

DEPARTMENT: Community Services PREPARED BY: Neil Davis, Community Services Director PRESENTER: Neil Davis, Community Services Director.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2024 Riverside Park Plans

2. Tech Specs

3. Riverside Park Regeneration_DRAFT Special Provisions 2024-05-08 Summary: Council will review and approve plans and specifications for the Riverside Park Regeneration Project, and consider directing Staff to advertise for bids.

Background: The City of Ukiah’s Riverside Park is located at the end of Gobbi Street along the Russian River. The 36-acre park is currently home to a gravel parking lot, Little League fields (installed in ~1984), the Rusty Bowl BMX track, and a 1.6 mile trail system. Prior to its designation and incremental development as a park, the site was home to a shooting range, a wastewater treatment plant (demolished in 1958), and was used as a dumping ground for detritus including asphalt and concrete, as well as street sweepings.

The Little League field and BMX track are on the north end of the park. Trails are located on the southern end of the park that wind among and over old depressions that for many years were used to dump and cover asphalt and concrete detritus.

In June of 2008 the California Natural Resources Agency awarded the City $810,000 for an initial phase of site restoration. The first phase of the restoration focused on the area closest to the river and removed detritus and non-native plants in the immediate riparian zone. Irrigation and native plants were added, along with trail improvements, including the creation of an ADA trail that allows trail users to proceed from the parking lot past the BMX track to the trail system. These improvements have been well received by the community and the location is already a popular destination for dog walkers and nature lovers.

In 2020, the City received an additional grant of $1,113,700 for a second phase of restoration and park improvements, entitled the Riverside Park Regeneration Project. Melton Design Group was contracted to prepare plans for the project and to prepare appropriate environmental documents as needed.

The current grant funded project will focus on the central area of the Park and will 1) remove asphalt and concrete detritus, 2) regrade the area to a more natural contour with low-lying areas, 3) improve the habitat created by the low-lying areas by mimicking wetlands, 4) replant with native plants, and 5) make trail improvements. CEQA documentation was completed in March of 2023.

Discussion: Melton design group has now completed the 100% plans for the project (Attachment 1). Bidding documents including Technical Specifications (Attachment 2), and Special Provisions (Attachment 3). All plans have been reviewed by both Public Works and the Purchasing Department. Detritus removal and reshaping of the contours should begin in the early summer to allow for irrigation installation and planting to be completed

Page 502 of 750 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

in the fall and winter. Grant requirements necessitate completing the project by March 1st of 2025.

The engineer has estimated the cost of this project at $794,629. The existing budget, as approved in the 5- year Capital Improvement Plan, is $760,728. Upon a detailed review of available grant funds, it was found that $832,005 can be allocated from these sources. The budget will be adjusted to reflect this during the approval of the bid award. Staff seeks Council's approval of 1) Attachment 1 - Plans and Specifications; and 2) direction to open bidding on the project.

Recommended Action: Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Riverside Park Regeneration Project, Specification 24-05, and Direct Staff to Advertise Bids.

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: No
CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: 30522250.80220.18014: $760,728
PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A
FINANCING SOURCE: California Natural Resources Agency Grant PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.:

COORDINATED WITH: Mary Horger, Financial Services Manager; Myles Fisette, Purchasing Manager; Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director
DIVERSITY-EQUITY INITIATIVES (DEI): N/A
CLIMATE INITIATIVES (CI): 4b – Maintain wild lands.

GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS (GP): GP-A4 - Public Facilities, Services, and Infrastructure Element

Page 503 of 750 ends

PREPARED BY OR UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: GREG MELTON RLA No. 4217 1281 E. GOBBI STREET RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION PROJECT PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF: SHEET TITLE DATE MELTON DESIGN GROUP L0.0 L0.1 L0.2 L0.3 L1.0 L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 TITLE SHEET PROJECT CHECKLIST EROSION CONTROL PLAN EROSION CONTROL DETAILS EXISTING CONDITIONS, SITE ACCESS, AND DEMOLITION GRADING PLAN GRADING SECTIONS GRADING SECTIONS GRADING SECTIONS CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND DETAILS PLANTING PLAN PLANTING DETAILS IRRIGATION PLAN IRRIGATION DETAILS CONSTRUCTION UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC), CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC), CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC), CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC), AND THE 2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY STANDARDS AS AMENDED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE: ACCEPTED BY: DATE PROJECT SITE 300 SEMINARY AVENUE UKIAH, CA 95482 CITY OF UKIAH CHICO 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 PROJECT SITE UKIAH PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: UKIAH, CA 95482 E. GOBBI STREET KEY MAP OF MENDOCINO COUNTY SACRAMENTO 1930 G STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95811 (916) 754-2153 CITY REPRESENTATIVE NAME REPRESENTATIVE TITLE SCALE: NTS NORTH RUSSIAN RIVER PLAN LAYOUT POINTS TO BE PROVIDED TO CONTRACTOR FOR USE BY CONTRACTOR TO STAKE OUT SITE ELEMENTS NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:05 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L0.0-TITL.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 TITLE SHEET L0.0 1 SCALE: NTS NORTH BABCOCK LANE OAK MANOR DR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS LAYDOWN AREA SHEET INDEX L-2.0 L-3.0 L-3.1 L-4.0 L-4.1 Attachment 1

Page 504 of 750 ends

© MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:05 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L0.0-TITL.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 TITLE SHEET L0.1 2 LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL CHECKLIST PACKAGE (LDP) CHECKLIST (DESIGN) CHECK BOX CHECK BOX DATE: CONTACT INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: CHECKLIST OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN THE LDP WATER SUPPLY TYPE AND NAME OF LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR: CONTACT SITE OWNER-CITY OF UKIAH DEPT. OF COMMUNITY SERVICES PROJECT TYPE (CONSTRUCTION OF SEASONAL WETLANDS) TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (IN SQUARE FEET): 272,400 SF APPLICANT (CONTRACTOR): PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF UKIAH 300 SEMINARY AVENUE UKIAH, CA 95482 PROJECT APPLICANT: (CONTRACTOR) "I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE." APPLICANT SIGNATURE (CONTRACTOR) WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET INCLUDING: 1) HYDROZONE INFORMATION TABLE 2) WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS INCLUDING: a. MAX APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) INCLUDING WATER FEATURES b. ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) SOILS MANAGEMENT REPORT: TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN: SHEET L-3.0 - L3.1 IRRIGATION DESIGN PLAN: SHEET L-4.0 - L4.1 GRADING DESIGN PLAN: L1.1 - L1.4 CONSTRUCTION DESIGN PLAN: SHEET L-2.0 TREE PROTECTION NOTES DESCRIPTION OWNER REP. INITIALS GC INITIALS DESCRIPTION PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH PROJECT SCHEDULE MATERIAL SUBMITTAL PACKAGE (DIGITAL COPY INITIAL- UPON APPROVAL, PROVIDE APPROVED HARD COPIES : 2 COPIES TO CLIENT, 1 COPY TO CLIENT IF APPLICABLE) AFTER MASS GRADING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A SOILS REPORT. SUBMIT TO CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE. MAINLINE PRESSURE TEST & TRENCH OBSERVATION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR OBSERVATION PRIOR TO BACK FILL. FERTILIZER/ AMENDMENT TAGS. CONTRACTOR IS TO SUBMIT TAGS OF FERTILIZER(S) AND AMENDMENTS TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR VERIFICATION ON QUANTITIES. IRRIGATION OPERATION, COVERAGE TEST, LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALL MAINLINE TRACKING TAPE, AND IRRIGATION AUDIT (PRIOR TO PLANTING AND INSTALLATION OF MULCH OR SURFACE MATERIAL FOR DRIP SYSTEMS. FOR SPRAY SYSTEMS: AUDIT TO OCCUR PRIOR TO PLANTING.) FINAL APPROVAL OF IRRIGATION INITIAL ENTRY INTO MAINTENANCE PERIOD. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR OBSERVATION. PUNCHLIST FOLLOWUP OBSERVATION FOR ENTRY INTO MAINTENANCE PERIOD. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR VERIFICATION OF PUNCHLIST ITEMS MAINTENANCE PERIOD PER SPECIFICATIONS START DATE:__________________________ PROJECTED FINISH DATE:___________________________ AS-BUILTS (HARD COPY AND DIGITAL). CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR AS-BUILT APPROVAL. CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS PER SPECIFICATIONS. FINAL OBSERVATION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR OBSERVATION. CERTIFICATIONS OF COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SUBMIT COMPLETED CERTIFICATES OF COMPLETION FROM PROJECT APPLICANT AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO OWNER. NOTIFICATION OF MAINTENANCE PERIOD ENDING TO OWNER. NOTE: · THIS LIST OF REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AND INSPECTIONS IS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. SEE BOOK FORM SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR COMPLETE SUBMITTAL AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. · PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2 WORKING DAYS NOTICE FOR ALL OBSERVATIONS. · IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE ALL SUBMITTALS AND INSPECTIONS ARE COMPLETED AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. · CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR OBSERVATION. THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING SOILS ANALYSIS OF SITE SOIL FROM AN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY AND AMENDING THE SOIL AS PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LANDSCAPES STATED IN RATES OF COMMONLY AVAILABLE AMENDMENTS (CUBIC YARDS OR WEIGHT PER 1,000 SF). RECOMMENDATIONS PENDING LABORATORY ANALYSIS. SOIL REPORT NOTE 1. PRIOR TO ANY GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING CLEARING AND GRUBBING, SCRAPING, OR GRADING, THE SUPERVISING CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION (PRE-GROUND DISTURBANCE) SITE MEETING WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, CITY OF UKIAH, AND THE SUPERVISING CONTRACTOR. THE PURPOSE OF THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SITE MEETING IS TO VERIFY THAT TREE PROTECTION FENCING IS IN PLACE AND TO INSURE THAT ALL PARTIES ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE NATURE OF THE WORK INVOLVED. 2. PRIOR TO ANY GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, AND PRIOR TO THE SUPERVISING CONTRACTOR'S MAKING THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SITE MEETING, A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS INDICATED ON PLANS. THE FENCE SHALL BE 4' MINIMUM HEIGHT, ORANGE POLYETHYLENE FENCING AS MANUFACTURED BY GEOTENAX CORP. (800-356-8495), OR EQUAL. INSTALL WITH METAL 'T' STAKES (TO EXTEND TO 4 FOOT MINIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE FINISH GRADE). FENCING SHALL BE SUBSTANTIAL ENOUGH TO RESTRICT ACTIVITY TO OUTSIDE THE AREA AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. DURING CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED SO THAT THE FENCE REMAINS IN GOOD REPAIR. REMOVAL OF THE FENCE SHALL ONLY OCCUR TO ALLOW REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE AREA OR TO COMPLETE SITE LANDSCAPING. MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO TREE LIMBS, CROWN, CANOPY, AND TRUNK OF TREES TO REMAIN. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT THE TREE FROM EXCESS FILL AND/OR THE REMOVAL OF EXCESS SOIL FROM THE TREE ROOT ZONE. THE TREE ROOT ZONE IS A PROJECTED RADIUS ON THE GROUND FORMED BY THE OUTERMOST EDGE OF THE TREE CANOPY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MINIMIZE COMPACTION OF THE SOIL WITHIN THE TREE ROOT ZONES OF ALL TREES TO REMAIN. 5. WHEN EXISTING TREE ROOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING THE COURSE OF TRENCHING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT THE TREE ROOTS FROM DESICCATION (DRYING OUT), BY APPLICATION OF A SEALING AGENT AND BY MINIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT TREE ROOTS ARE EXPOSED. TREE ROOTS SHALL ONLY BE EXPOSED WHEN TEMPERATURES ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE ABOVE FORTY DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AND BELOW 90 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AND SHALL NOT REMAIN EXPOSED LONGER THAN 12 HOURS. IN THE EVENT THAT TRENCHES WITHIN TREE ROOT ZONES CANNOT BE BACKFILLED WITHIN 12 HOURS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COVER EXPOSED ROOTS WITH BURLAP AND MAINTAIN MOISTURE BY APPLICATION OF WATER TO MOISTEN BURLAP UNTIL TRENCHES CAN BE BACKFILLED. 6. UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND TRENCHES, (e.g., UTILITY SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER, OR STORM DRAINAGE LINES) SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED, TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE, AND LOCATED TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS UPON TREE ROOT SYSTEMS. ANY TRENCHING OR UNDERGROUND WORK SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE TREE DRIPLINE TO THE FULLEST EXTENT FEASIBLE. ANY TRENCHING REQUIRED WITHIN THE TREE DRIPLINE SHALL BE AS FAR FROM THE TREE TRUNK AS POSSIBLE AND SHALL BE EXCAVATED BY HAND OR 'AIR SPADE' OR PNEUMATIC EXCAVATOR TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON ROOTS. 7. ROOTS 3/4 IN. OR GREATER IN SIZE ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCHING SHALL BE CLEANLY HAND PRUNED AND TREATED WITH A SEALING AGENT TO REDUCE LOSS OF MOISTURE TO THE TREE. ROOTS GREATER THAN 1-1/2 IN. SHALL BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO MINIMIZE ABRASIONS TO ROOT BARK. 8. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, OR MATERIALS (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO JOB SHACKS, PORTABLE TOILETS, AND CLEANOUT FACILITIES) SHALL NOT BE PARKED OR STORED WITHIN THE FENCED AREA. NO STAGING OR STORAGE AREA FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 20 FEET TO THE DRIPLINE OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. 9. ALL CONSTRUCTION WASTES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BUILDING MATERIAL DEBRIS, ROOFING MATERIALS, CLEANING OF CEMENT TRUCKS, CHEMICALS/ADHESIVES/SOLVENTS, ETC., SHALL BE STORED OR DISPOSED OF NO CLOSER THAN 20 FEET FROM ANY TREE DRIPLINE. 10. EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED AND PROTECTED AS INDICATED ON THE DEMOLITION AND/ OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS. DATE ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION DEROCKING 12" DEEP, REMOVING ALL ROCKS, ROOTS, AND FOREIGN MATERIAL LARGER THAN 1" 12" RIPPING SOIL AMENDMENTS AND TILL INTO TOP 6" - VERIFY AMENDMENT QUANTITIES AND SOIL AMENDMENTS WORKED INTO 6" PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING FINAL GRADE INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE PROJECT ADDRESS: 1281 E GOBBI ST, UKIAH, CA 95482 MENDOCINO COUNTY APN: 1800101000 1 YEAR ACCEPTANCE OF PLANT WARRANTY PERIOD. DATE TO BE 1 YEAR AFTER APPROVAL OF 90-DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD:____

Page 505 of 750 ends

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR
FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF
SF SF

SF SF SF

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF FR FR FR FR FR FR FR
FR
FR FR
FR
FR FR
FR
FR
FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FRFR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS LIMIT OF WORK FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING NORTH EROSION CONTROL PLAN L0.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT AND RETAIN EXISTING GRAVEL PATHS, HARDSCAPE, ASPHALT PATHS, LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION, ETC. THAT ARE NOT DESIGNATED FOR DEMOLITION OR MODIFICATION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COVER EXISTING ASPHALT PATHS, ROADWAYS, CURBS, MOW CURBS AND OTHER ELEMENTS TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ALL DAMAGED SURFACES, AMENITIES, HARDSCAPES, LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, ETC. DUE TO HIS/HER ACTIVITY OR NEGLECT AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 8 SYMBOL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF UKIAH STANDARDS AND THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 2. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO BE IN PLACE BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS PER DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. CONTRACTOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PLAN SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD PERMIT COMPLIANCE. 6. SWPPP TO BE PREPARED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FIBER ROLL AT BACK OF CURB OR BANK AND IN AREAS REQUIRED BY THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 7.1. INSPECTION BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FREQUENT. REPAIRS AND/OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE PROMPTLY; AS REQUIRED. 7.2. ACCUMULATED SILT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH OF NINE INCHES. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL FIBER ROLLS AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. SILT BUILDUP IN SILTING BASIN AREA SHALL BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY. REMOVE ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION DEVICES AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. 9. INTERIM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE NEEDED AND SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO ASSURE ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES ARE IN PLACE AT ALL TIMES. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DUST CONTROL MEASURES IN THE FORM OF WATER APPLICATION TO ALL EXPOSED SOIL SURFACES TO PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL FROM EXPOSED SURFACES ON CONSTRUCTION SITES IN THE FORM OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATES. WATERING OF EXPOSED SOIL SURFACES SHALL OCCUR AT LEAST TWICE DAILY, PREFERABLY IN THE LATE MORNING AND AFTER WORK IS DONE FOR THE DAY. ALL CLEARING, GRADING, EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL CEASE WHEN WINDS EXCEED 15 MPH AVERAGED OVER 1 HOUR. 11. ANY SOIL MATERIAL CARRIED ONTO STREET SURFACES BY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE REMOVED ON A DAILY BASIS. (BROOM OR VACUUM CLEAN- DO NOT USE WATER TO WASH THE STREET). 12. HAUL TRUCKS SHALL BE COVERED WITH TARPAULINS OR OTHER EFFECTIVE COVERS AT ALL TIMES. 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPING, REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 14. SOIL STOCKPILES NOT USED WITHIN THE LAST 14 DAYS MUST BE COVERED WITH AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR PLASTIC SHEETING AND CONTAINED WITH A FIBER ROLL OR GRAVEL BAG BERM. 15. MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THROUGHOUT ENTIRETY OF PROJECT DURATION. 16. ENSURE THAT DUST CONTROL MEASURES DEPOSIT NO DUST TO ADJACENT PROPERTY BY NECESSARY MEASURES INCLUDING WATER APPLICATION, DUST CONTROL BARRIERS AND FENCING, AND COVERING DUST PRODUCING AREAS AND ACTIVITIES. STORAGE OF SOIL AND AND OTHER PARTICULATE MATERIAL MUST BE MAINTAINED AND REPLACED IF NECESSARY TO ENSURE ADJACENT PROPERTY RECEIVES NO DUST OR POWDER DEPOSIT FROM CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND EXECUTION. EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION ENTRY, TRACK OUT, AND CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA LOCATIONS TO BE LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF SITE. 2. SEE DETAIL 3/L1.1 FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS DETAIL. 3. SEE DETAIL 4/L1.1 FOR CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS NOTE JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS NOTE 1. RETAIN AND PROTECT JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND. STAKE LIMITS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 10' SETBACK WITH SILT FENCE AND FIBER ROLL. 2. SILT FENCE AND FIBER ROLL TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF GRADING FIBER ROLL SILT FENCE PER WETLANDS NOTE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND ADJACENT PROPERTY FENCE EXISTING PATH SEE DETAIL 1/L-1.6 SEE DETAIL 2/L-1.6 SEE DETAIL 3/L-1.6 SEE WETLANDS NOTE RETAIN AND PROTECT. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS. DESCRIPTION © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L0.2-EROS-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40' SF FR

Page 506 of 750 ends

EROSION CONTROL DETAILS L0.3 9 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L0.2-EROS-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 FIBER ROLL LAYOUT N.T.S. 1'-0" 3" 8" DIA. FIBER ROLL SLOPE SLOPE 1" X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE AT 4' O.C. MAX. FIBER ROLL MIN. MIN. 2" 1L1.6 SILT FENCE N.T.S. 2'-0" 2'-6" 5'-0" 6'-0" MAX. 1'-6" 1'-0" 2'-0" 6" 2"x4" WOOD POST. STANDARD OR BETTER OR EQUAL ALTERNATE: STEEL FENCE POST. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 60" WIDE ROLLS. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE. SILT BASIN BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN 8" X 12" TRENCH (SEE BELOW) FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL SILT BASIN 2"x4" WOOD POST. STANDARD OR BETTER OR EQUAL ALTERNATE: STEEL FENCE POST. FOLD AND SET FILTER FABRIC INTO SOIL BACKFILL AND COMPACT EXCAVATED SOIL IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FENCE POSTS BACKFILL (SEE BELOW) 2L1.6 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS N.T.S. NOTES: 1. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 1-1/2" MAXIMUM AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL CONFORMING TO SECTION 26 OF STATE SPECIFICATIONS. MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED TO A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF SIX INCHES. THE METHOD OF PLACING, SPREADING AND COMPACTING AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 26 OF THE STATE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LENGTH OF SITE ACCESS SHALL BE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF FIFTY FEET. WIDTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWENTY FEET, OR GREATER AS NECESSARY TO COVER ALL VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS. 3. THE SITE ACCESS SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION BY OCCASIONAL TOP DRESSING WITH AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL OR CLEANED AS DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT SUPERVISOR. 4. TRUCK TIRES SHALL BE WASHED DOWN AND THE SEDIMENT CONTAINED ON THE PROJECT SITE. AA TURN DOWN FABRIC 12", ANCHOR W/ WIRE STAPLES 18" o.c., 12' MIN. WIDTH, TYP. AT BEGIN AND END PLAN VIEW SECTION A-A

RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION SITE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 12' MINIMUM 6" PLACE "D" BALLAST OR 1-1/2" MAX. AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL. CONSTRUCTION SITE 50' MINIMUM OR AS APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS EXISTING GROUND STABILIZED ACCESS GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 3L1.6

Page 507 of 750 ends

X-102 X-102 X-102 X-102 X-103 D-101 X-107 X-106 X-106 EROSION CONTROL AND PROJECT LIMITS 10' FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY FENCE; SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN X-108 D-101 X-103 LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK X-104 D-102 X-104 X-105 D-102 X-101 LIMIT OF WORK D-103 X-109 X-109 X-109 X-109 X-109 X-109 X-109 X-109 LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING LIMIT OF GRADING X-110 X-110 X-110 X-110 X-110 PROTECT ALL (E) TREES (TYP) DEMOLITION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION REMOVE DEBRIS PILES OF CONCRETE, ASPHALT, AND PLANT MATERIAL, REMOVE SAME DEBRIS 12" BELOW FINISH GRADE AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE, AND GRADE PER GRADING PLAN. SOME DEBRIS MAY EXIST ABOVE GRADE AND BELOW GRADE. REMOVE EXISTING FENCE AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE REMOVE EXISTING TREE, GRIND ALL ROOTS TO A DEPTH OF 36" AND REMOVE ALL GRINDINGS / ORGANIC MATTER AND COMPACT WITH TOPSOIL TO A 90% DENSITY. DISPOSE OF ALL ORGANIC MATTER OFF-SITE. EXISTING CONDITIONS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION STAGING AND LAYDOWN AREA. COORDINATE ACCESS WITH OWNER. RETAIN AND PROTECT GRAVEL TRAIL SURFACE. RETAIN AND PROTECT JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND. STAKE LIMITS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SEE ALSO JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND NOTES ON SHEET L1.0. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING FENCE RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING GATE RETAIN AND PROTECT BURIED STORM DRAIN. RETAIN AND PROTECT STEEL PLATES. RETAIN AND PROTECT PLANTING AT EAST OF SITE. VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE ON EXISTING GRAVEL TRAIL. ENSURE THAT SITE RECEIVES MINIMAL TRAFFIC THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. SEE DEMOLITION NOTES #5 REGARDING REPAIRING DAMAGE. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE D-101 D-102 D-103 X-101 X-102 X-103 X-104 X-105 X-106 X-107 X-108 X-109 X-110 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE 588 LIMIT OF GRADING TREE PROTECTION MEASURES EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT AND RETAIN EXISTING HARDSCAPE, ASPHALT PATHS, LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION, ETC. THAT ARE NOT DESIGNATED FOR DEMOLITION OR MODIFICATION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ASPHALT PATHS, ROADWAYS, CURBS, MOW CURBS AND OTHER ELEMENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ALL DAMAGED SURFACES, AMENITIES, HARDSCAPES, LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, ETC. DUE TO HIS/HER ACTIVITY OR NEGLECT AND AS APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT. 1. THE NATURAL GRADE AROUND THE DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION. THE UNDISTURBED AREA SHALL BE AT DRIPLINE, BUT IN NO CASE CLOSER THAN 20 FEET FROM THE TREE TRUNK. THE DRIPLINE OF A TREE IS A PROJECTED RADIUS ON THE GROUND FORMED BY THE OUTERMOST EDGE OF THE TREE CANOPY. NO GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL OCCUR WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREE. IF EXCAVATION WITHIN DRIPLINE IS NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAND DIG UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A CERTIFIED ARBORIST ON SITE TO MONITOR ALL ROOT PRUNING AND BRANCH PRUNING OF ALL EXISTING TREES. ROUTE ALL TRENCHING TO AVOID TREES. HAND DIG TRENCH WHERE PRESENT AT LARGE ROOTS, 3/4" DIAMETER OR LARGER. 2. WHERE GRADE CHANGES MUST OCCUR WITHIN THE DRIPLINE, A SUITABLE MITIGATION PLAN SHALL BE DEVELOPED BY EITHER A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. THE PLAN SHALL PROTECT THE TREE FROM EXCESS FILL AND/OR THE REMOVAL OF EXCESS SOIL FROM THE ROOT ZONE. 3. PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION, EXISTING TREES SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE LIMBS WHICH MAY BE DEAD OR MAY BECOME DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED CONSISTENT WITH ANSI A300 PRUNING STANDARDS, PRUNE TO THIN 1 IN. 4. A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL TREE TRUNKS WITHIN CONSTRUCTION ZONE. WRAP TRUNK 4 TIMES AND SECURE FENCING TO TRUNK FOR DURATION OF PROJECT. CONFIRM WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ON BOUNDARY. THE FENCE SHALL BE SUBSTANTIAL ENOUGH TO RESTRICT ACTIVITY TO OUTSIDE THE AREA AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. DURING CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED SO THAT THE FENCE REMAINS IN GOOD REPAIR. REMOVAL OF THE FENCE SHALL ONLY OCCUR TO ALLOW REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE AREA OR TO COMPLETE SITE LANDSCAPING. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE CONTACTED, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, TO INSPECT FENCING AND TO APPROVE ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE DRIPLINE. 5. TREES TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CONSTRUCTION FENCING AT THE DRIPLINE. CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE 4 FT. HIGH ORANGE PLASTIC MESH OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SUPPORTED ON STEEL T-POST A MINIMUM OF 6 FT. LONG. FENCING MAY OCCUR AT THE COMBINED DRIPLINES OF GROVES OF TREES. APPROVED ARBORIST SHALL MARK TREES PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND TRENCHES, (e.g., UTILITY SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER, OR STORM DRAINAGE LINES) SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED, TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE, AND LOCATED TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS UPON TREE ROOT SYSTEMS. ANY TRENCHING OR UNDERGROUND WORK SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE TREE DRIPLINE. ANY TRENCHING REQUIRED WITHIN THE TREE DRIPLINE SHALL BE AS FAR FROM THE TREE TRUNK AS POSSIBLE AND SHALL BE EXCAVATED BY HAND TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON ROOTS. ALL TRENCHING WITHIN THE DRIPLINE SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. 7. ROOTS 3/4 IN. OR GREATER IN SIZE ENCOUNTERED DURING TRENCHING SHALL BE CLEANLY CUT AND TREATED WITH A SEALING AGENT TO REDUCE LOSS OF MOISTURE TO THE TREE. ROOTS GREATER THAN 1-1/2 IN. SHALL BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED AT THE DIRECTION OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. 8. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, OR MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE PARKED OR STORED WITHIN THE FENCED AREA. NO STAGING OR STORAGE AREA FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 50 FEET TO THE DRIPLINE OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. 9. ALL CONSTRUCTION WASTES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BUILDING MATERIAL DEBRIS, ROOFING MATERIALS, CLEANING OF CEMENT TRUCKS, CHEMICALS/ADHESIVES/SOLVENTS, ETC., SHALL BE STORED NO CLOSER THAN 50 FEET FROM ANY TREE DRIPLINE. 1. CONSTRUCTION ENTRY, TRACK OUT, AND CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA LOCATIONS TO BE LOCATED AT NORTHERN CORNER OF SITE. SEE SITE ACCESS, DEMOLITION, AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. SEE DETAIL 3/L1.1 FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS DETAIL. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS NOTES SYMBOL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION LIMIT OF WORK, CONSTRUCTION FENCING JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND EXISTING CONTOUR - 1' INTERVALS NEW CONTOUR - 1' INTERVALS AND AS LABELED LIMIT OF GRADING ADJACENT PROPERTY FENCE © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L1.0-DEMO-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 NORTH EXISTING CONDITIONS, SITE ACCESS, AND DEMOLITION L1.0 3 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40' FENCE - DEMO EXISTING PATH DEBRIS PILES, SEE REFERENCE NOTE D-101 1. CONFIRM ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROJECT SITE PRIOR TO DEMOLITION AND EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF DAMAGE TO ALL EXISTING UTILITIES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. CALL ALL APPLICABLE AGENCIES AND USA, (800) 642-2444. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CANNOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION. PROVISION OF TENTATIVE UTILITY LOCATION DOES NOT IN ANY WAY RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT USA AND APPLICABLE AGENCIES AND CONDUCT FIELD DISCOVERY TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBSERVE ALL SAFETY REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS PROJECT. 3. ANY CHANGES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL VEGETATION AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IN AREAS OF FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE SLABS, AND DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM CONSTRUCTION AREA AND DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING HARDSCAPE, AGGREGATE SURFACES AND LANDSCAPES (INCLUDING TREES), UNLESS CALLED OUT FOR DEMOLITION ON THIS SHEET, FROM DAMAGE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO HARDSCAPES, AGGREGATES AND LANDSCAPES RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. REFER TO BOOK FORM SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. DEMOLITION NOTES

Page 508 of 750 ends

Page 509 of 750 ends

Elevation
Elevation Station Station PROFILE VIEW OF GRADING SECTION-1 580.00 585.00 590.00 595.00 600.00 580.00 585.00 590.00 595.00 600.00 -0+50.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 4+62.97 5+00.00 5+50.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 4+62.97 5+00.00 5+50.00 MICRO-DEPRESSION ELEV: 586' PROPOSED SURFACE EXISTING SURFACE OUTFALL ELEV: 587' FLOWLINE ELEV: 586.9' (P) WETLAND HABITAT, SEE NOTE 1 PROPOSED SURFACE CUT FILL (P) WETLAND HABITAT, SEE NOTE 1 GRADING SECTIONS L1.2 5 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L1.1-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 1. OVEREXCAVATE (P) WETLAND HABITAT AREAS AND BACKFILL WITH COMPACTED CLAY AND NATIVE TOPSOIL AS SHOWN IN DETAIL 3, SHEET L2.0 NOTES:

Page 510 of 750 ends

Elevation
Elevation Station Station PROFILE VIEW OF GRADING SECTION - 2 570.00 575.00 580.00 585.00 590.00 595.00 600.00 570.00 575.00 580.00 585.00 590.00 595.00 600.00 -0+50.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 8+83.90 9+00.00 9+50.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 8+83.90 9+00.00 9+50.00 PROPOSED SURFACE EXISTING SURFACE WATER RETENTION LEVEL ELEV: 577' CUT FILL (P) WETLAND HABITAT, SEE NOTE 1 (P) WETLAND HABITAT, SEE NOTE 1 (E) JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND, RETAIN AND PROTECT GRADING SECTIONS L1.3 6 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L1.1-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 1. OVEREXCAVATE (P) WETLAND HABITAT AREAS AND BACKFILL WITH COMPACTED CLAY AND NATIVE TOPSOIL AS SHOWN IN DETAIL 3, SHEET L2.0 NOTES:

Page 511 of 750 ends

Elevation
Elevation Station Station 570.00 575.00 580.00 585.00 590.00 595.00 600.00 570.00 575.00 580.00 585.00 590.00 595.00 600.00 -0+50.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 5+35.46 6+00.00 6+50.00 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 5+35.46 6+00.00 6+50.00 EXISTING SURFACE PROPOSED SURFACE WATER RETENTION LEVEL ELEV: 577' EXISTING PEDESTRIAN PATH CUT FILL (P) WETLAND HABITAT, SEE NOTE 1 (E) JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND, RETAIN AND PROTECT GRADING SECTIONS L1.4 7 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L1.1-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 1. OVEREXCAVATE (P) WETLAND HABITAT AREAS AND BACKFILL WITH COMPACTED CLAY AND NATIVE TOPSOIL AS SHOWN IN DETAIL 3, SHEET L2.0 NOTES:

Page 512 of 750 ends

01 GENERAL SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL CLAY LAYER 3/L2.0 PAVING SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL BASALT CHIP SURFACE (CRUSHER DUST 3/8" MINUS). COMPACT IN 1/L2.0 TWO EQUAL LIFTS. SURFACE TO CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS. GRAVEL 1" MINUS, 3" DEPTH. COMPACT NATIVE SOIL TO 90% R.D. INSTALL AND COMPACT GRAVEL IN TWO EQUAL LIFTS. SITE FURNISHINGS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL BOULDER - SEE BOULDER SCHEDULE FOR SIZES 2/L2.0 01-01 P-101 P-102 S-105 LIMIT OF WORK 586.5 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 594.10 HP 594.10 HP 591.05 HP 594.10 HP 592.15 HP (589.40) PATH (588.60) PATH (588.50) PATH (588.80) PATH (588.90) PATH (588.00) PATH 586.50 ELEV 586.44 ELEV 586.92 FL 588.01 OUTFALL (588.57) PATH (587.72) PATH (590.00) PATH (590.81) PATH (591.51) PATH (591.96) PATH 586.76 FL 586.45 FL 586.81 FL 586.80 FL 586.89 FL 580585 578 579581 582 583 584586587 580585578 579581 582 583 584 586 587 588
588
590 590
587588
589
591 591 592 592 593 593 594 594 590589 591 592 593 594 591 592 593 594 594 590 589 588 591 587 588 587
588 589
592 586
592 589.80 LP 587
589
587 590591 (589.49) PATH (586.84) PATH 588 590 590 588 588 586584 582 588 588.22 588.26
589
586.25 586.25
586.25
586.25
587 2 13 2 2 23 2 12 1 2 1 P-101 P-101 S-105 S-105 01-01 01-01 01-01 P-102 LIMIT OF WORK CONFORM TO EXISTING PATH CONFORM TO EXISTING PATH SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 2' x 2' BOULDER 4 2' x 4' BOULDER 7 4' x 6' BOULDER 2 213 QUANTITY EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT AND RETAIN EXISTING HARDSCAPE, ASPHALT PATHS, LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION, ETC. THAT ARE NOT DESIGNATED FOR DEMOLITION OR MODIFICATION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COVER EXISTING ASPHALT PATHS, ROADWAYS, CURBS, MOW CURBS AND OTHER ELEMENTS TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ALL DAMAGED SURFACES, AMENITIES, HARDSCAPES, LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, ETC. DUE TO HIS/HER ACTIVITY OR NEGLECT AND AS DIRECTED BY OWNER. REFERENCE NOTES LEGEND 1. CONFIRM ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROJECT SITE PRIOR TO DEMOLITION AND EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT AND RETAIN EXISTING UTILITIES AND THE REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF UTILITIES DAMAGED DUE TO CONTRACTORS WORK OR NEGLECT. 2. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CANNOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF EXISTING INFORMATION. PROVISION OF UTILITY LOCATION DOES NOT IN ANY WAY RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY TO CONDUCT FIELD DISCOVERY TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS. 4. CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO ALL UNIFORM BUILDING CODES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBSERVE ALL SAFETY REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS PROJECT. 6. ANY CHANGES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION NOTESBOULDER SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND DETAILS L2.0 10 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L2.0-CONS-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 NORTH 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40' LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND SYMBOL LEGEND NOTES: 1. BASALT CHIP SHALL BE BASALT QUARRY FINES, 14 INCH OR LESS. COLOR: MATCH EXISTING. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2. APPLY WEED KILLER AND PRE-EMERGENT TO AREA PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF BASALT CHIP. 3. INSTALL IN 2 EQUAL LIFTS. 4. AFTER PLACEMENT OF EACH LIFT, THOROUGHLY WATER UNTIL ENTIRE DEPTH IS MOIST. COMPACT WITH A 1,000 TO 3,000 LB ROLLER AFTER GRADING AND WETTING. SECTION 3 1'-0" VARIES 1'-0" 4" 4" 3 2 1 4 BASALT CHIP SURFACE NOT TO SCALE BASALT CHIP SURFACE PER PLAN. 4" MINIMUM DEPTH AFTER COMPACTION. SLOPE PER GRADING PLAN. 12 COMPACTED SUB-GRADE TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY. CLEAN-CUT EDGE FOR INSTALLATION EXCAVATION, REPLACE WITH NATIVE TOPSOIL FOR RE-VEGETATION. 34 NATIVE SOIL TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. 1L2.0 1 5 3 12345 4 7 SURFACE MATERIAL PER CONSTRUCTION PLAN FINISH SURFACE WATER WASHED GRANITE BOULDERS, SIZE PER PLAN. AVAILABLE FROM SIERRA BOULDER, ROBERT WRIGHT (916) 955-0649. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PHOTO SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. INSTALL BOULDER SO THAT 25% OF BOULDER IS BELOW FINISH GRADE. NATIVE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 6" DEPTH CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACT TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY. HEIGHT AND WEIGHT VARIES. SEE BOULDER SCHEDULE, SHEET L-2.0 67 2 BOULDER INSTALLATION 6 NOT TO SCALE 2L2.0 SEASONAL WETLAND MICRO-DEPRESSION TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE SEE TYPICAL SECTION EXTEND CLAY LAYER MINIMUM 24" BELOW FINISH GRADE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE 12 FINISH GRADE 3 WATER LEVEL AT FULL POOL. SEE GRADING PLANS FINISH GRADE NATIVE SOIL COMPACTED TO 85% RELATIVE DENSITY. 8" DEPTH EXCEPT AT EDGES, WHERE 24" DEEP AS SHOWN. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR FINAL GRADES 45 BENTONITE CLAY 4" DEPTH. TUCK DOWN 24" AS SHOWN. 6 SUBGRADE, NATIVE SOIL COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY 3456 2 8" 561 1 23 1 24" 3L2.0 SYMBOL DESCRIPTION

Page 513 of 750 ends

LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK 586.5 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 594.10 HP 594.10 HP 591.05 HP 594.10 HP 592.15 HP (589.40) PATH (588.60) PATH (588.50) PATH (588.80) PATH (588.90) PATH (588.00) PATH 586.50 ELEV 586.44 ELEV 586.92 FL 588.01 OUTFALL (588.57) PATH (587.72) PATH (590.00) PATH (590.81) PATH (591.51) PATH (591.96) PATH 586.76 FL 586.45 FL 586.81 FL 586.80 FL 586.89 FL 580585 578 579581 582 583 584586587 580585578 579581 582 583 584 586 587 588
588
590 590
587588
589
591 591 592 592 593 593 594 594 590589 591 592 593 594 591 592 593 594 594 590 589 588 591 587 588 587
588 589
586 592
592 589.80 LP 587
589
587 590591 (589.49) PATH (586.84) PATH 588 590 590 588 588 586584 582 588 588.22 588.26
589
586.25 586.25
586.25
586.25
587 SAMPLE GRASS MIX PATTERN, 1:1.5 RATIO CAREX TO ELYMUS CAREX BARBARAE 36" O.C. ELYMUS TRITICOIDES 24" O.C. TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY POP FRE POPULUS FREMONTII FREMONT COTTONWOOD TREEPOT4 29 QUE LOB QUERCUS LOBATA VALLEY OAK TREEPOT4 48 QUE WIS QUERCUS WISLIZENI INTERIOR LIVE OAK TREEPOT4 5 SAL LAE SALIX LAEVIGATA RED WILLOW TREEPOT4 17 LARGE SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COR SER CORNUS SERICEA RED TWIG DOGWOOD DEEPOT (D40) HET ARB HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON DEEPOT (D40) SAM NIG SAMBUCUS NIGRA SSP. CAERULERA MEXICAN ELDERBERRY DEEPOT (D40) SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROS CAL ROSA CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA WILD ROSE DEEPOT (D40) SYM ALB SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS LAEVIGATUS COMMON SNOWBERRY DEEPOT (D40) FRA CAL FRANGULA CALIFORNICA COFFEEBERRY DEEPOT (D40) GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CAR BAR CAREX BARBARAE SANTA BARBARA SEDGE SUPERCELL REFER TO SAMPLE GRASS MIX PATTERN ELY TRI ELYMUS TRITICOIDES WILD RYE SUPERCELL REFER TO SAMPLE GRASS MIX PATTERN 15' x 15' SQUARE (NOT TO SCALE) 393493379101,185 1,738 TOTAL GRASSES: 2,923 EROSION CONTROL MIX BULK LBS./AC PLS lbs/AC. SPECIES MINIMUM GERMINATION (%) 25 22.50 Bromus carinatus / California Brome 90 10 8.50 Elymus glaucus / Blue Wildrye 85 6 5.28 Festuca microstachys / Small Fescue 88 4 3.20 Trifolium willdenovii / Tomcat Clover 80 UPLAND SEED MIX BROMUS CARINATUS / CALIFORNIA BROME SEED 5% CALOCHORTUS SUPERBUS / YELLOW MARIPOSA LILY SEED 10% CALOCHORTUS TOLMIEI / TOLMIE STAR TULIP SEED 10% CHLOROGALUM POMERIDIANUM / SOAP PLANT SEED 2.5% CLARKIA CONCINNA SSP. CONCINNA / RED RIBBONS SEED 5% CLARKIA GRACILIS / SLENDER CLARKIA SEED 5% DICHELOSTEMMA CAPITATUM SSP. CAPITATUM / BLUE DICKS SEED 5% ELYMUS GLAUCUS / BLUE WILDRYE SEED 20% ERIOGONUM NUDUM / NAKED BUCKWHEAT SEED MELICA CALIFORNICA / MELIC SEED 10% TRIFOLIUM FUCATUM / BULL CLOVER SEED 10% TRIFOLIUM WILLDENOVII / TOMCAT CLOVER SEED 5% TRITELEIA LAXA / ITHURIEL'S SPEAR SEED 7.5% TRANSITIONAL SEED MIX ELYMUS GLAUCUS / BLUE WILDRYE SEED 40% ELYMUS TRITICOIDES / WILD RYE SEED 10% GRINDELIA CAMPORUM / GREAT VALLEY GUMWEED SEED 10% SISYRINCHIUM BELLUM / BLUE-EYED GRASS SEED 5% WETLAND SEED MIX BROMUS SITCHENSIS VAR. CARINATUS / CALIFORNIA BROME SEED 5% ELYMUS GLAUCUS / BLUE WILDRYE SEED 5% ELYMUS MULTISETUS / BIG SQUIRRELTAIL GRASS SEED 5% ESCHSCHOLZIA CALIFORNICA / CALIFORNIA POPPY SEED 2.5% FESTUCA MICROSTACHYS VAR. UPLAND / SMALL FESCUE SEED 5% HELENIUM BOLANDERI / COASTAL SNEEZEWEED SEED 2.5% HORDEUM BRACHYANTHERUM / MEADOW BARLEY SEED 30% LASTHENIA CALIFORNICA / CALIFORNIA GOLDFIELDS SEED 2.5% LUPINUS BICOLOR / MINIATURE LUPINE SEED 2.5% SISYRINCHIUM BELLUM / BLUE-EYED GRASS SEED 2.5% TRIFOLIUM FUCATUM / BULL CLOVER SEED 2.5% TRIFOLIUM MICROCEPHALUM / HAIRY CLOVER SEED 2.5% 1. VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE SET UP FOR REVIEW BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NO SUBSTITUTIONS FOR PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE ALLOWED UNLESS PRIOR ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IN THE EVENT OF PLANT MATERIAL UNAVAILABILITY, CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OR APPROVED SPECIES SUBSTITUTION. 3. PLANT QUANTITIES ARE FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXACT NUMBER. 4. TREE STAKES ARE TO BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO PREVAILING WINDS. REMOVE NURSERY STAKES, REPLACE WITH STAKES PER DETAIL. TREE TIES SHALL BE CINCH-TIE OR EQUAL. 5. ALL TREE, SHRUB AND GROUND COVER PLANTINGS TO HAVE BARK MULCH PLACED AROUND PLANT BASE PER PLANTING DETAILS. SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN. 6. REFER TO PLANS, DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 7. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BID ON THE BASIS OF SPECIES AND CONTAINER SIZE, NOT ON CONTAINER SIZE ALONE.

NORTH PLANTING PLAN L3.0 11 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L3.0-PLNT-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40' HYDROSEED SCHEDULE PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING NOTES LIMIT OF WORK JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND SYMBOL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION

Page 514 of 750 ends

PLANTING DETAILS L3.1 12 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L3.0-PLNT-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 12 3 456 ROOT BALL + 2" 2X ROOT BALL 7 TREE/SHRUB PLANTING 8 SET ROOT BALL CROWN 1" HIGHER THAN SURROUNDING FINISHED GRADE. 1 SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOT BALL. 23 FINISHED GRADE. 4 PLANT TABLETS PER SPECIFICATIONS 5 BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6 NATIVE SOIL MIX FIRMLY COMPACTED. GOPHER BASKET: GALVANIZED CHICKEN WIRE, EXPOSE 2" ABOVE GRADE. FOLD-IN AT BOTTOM FOR FULL COVERAGE AT SIDES AND BOTTOM. PLACE BASKET BEFORE BACKFILL AND PLANTING. 7 36" PROTECTIVE TREE TUBE AVAILABLE THROUGH TREE PRO (800) 875-8071 OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL ON TREES ONLY PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 8 ROOT BALL NOT TO SCALE 1L3.1 ROOT BALL + 2" 2X ROOT BALL TREE/SHRUB PLANTING ON SLOPE ROOT BALL NOT TO SCALE 8 5 6 11 SET ROOT BALL CROWN 1" HIGHER THAN TOP OF BACKFILL MIX 1 SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOT BALL. 23 ORIGINAL GRADE. 4 PLANT TABLETS PER SPECIFICATIONS 5 BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6 NATIVE SOIL MIX FIRMLY COMPACTED. GOPHER BASKET: GALVANIZED CHICKEN WIRE, EXPOSE 2" ABOVE GRADE. FOLD-IN AT BOTTOM FOR FULL COVERAGE AT SIDES AND BOTTOM. PLACE BASKET BEFORE BACKFILL AND PLANTING. 7 36" PROTECTIVE TREE TUBE AVAILABLE THROUGH TREE PRO (800) 875-8071 OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL ON TREES ONLY PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 8 ORIGINAL SLOPE SHOULD PASS THROUGH THE POINT WHERE THE TRUNK BASE MEETS SUBSTRATE/SOIL. 9 PRIOR TO MULCHING, LIGHTLY TAMP SOIL AROUND THE ROOT BALL IN 6" LIFTS TO BRACE TREE. DO NOT OVER COMPACT. WHEN THE PLANTING HOLE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED, POUR WATER AROUND THE ROOT BALL TO SETTLE THE SOIL. 10 ROUND-TOPPED SOIL BERM ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE SHALL BE CENTERED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE ROOT BALL FOR 240°. 11 3 7 10 4 12 9 L3.1 2 PLAN SECTION VIEW EQ. EQ. 1234 5 6 7 FINISH SURFACE WITH 2" OF TOP DRESSING OF MULCH. SEE SPECS. 12 SOIL BELOW MULCH AMENDED SOIL. SEE PLANS FOR SOIL PREPARATION. 34 EXISTING SOIL GROUNDCOVER PLANTS TO BE TRIANGULARLY SPACED, ROWS OFFSET 86% PLANT DISTANCE. 56 MULCH PER PLAN. 7 ADJACENT PAVING PER PLAN. NOTES: 1. SEE PLANTING LEGEND FOR GROUNDCOVER SPECIES AND SIZE. 2. SETTLE SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL OF EACH GROUNDCOVER PRIOR TO MULCHING. 6" MIN GROUND COVER PLANTING
86%
DISTANCE L3.1 NOT TO SCALE 3

Page 515 of 750 ends

586.5 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 586.00 LP 594.10 HP 594.10 HP 591.05 HP 594.10 HP 592.15 HP (589.40) PATH (588.60) PATH (588.50) PATH (588.80) PATH (588.90) PATH (588.00) PATH 586.50 ELEV 586.44 ELEV 586.92 FL 588.01 OUTFALL (588.57) PATH (587.72) PATH (590.00) PATH (590.81) PATH (591.51) PATH (591.96) PATH 586.76 FL 586.45 FL 586.81 FL 586.80 FL 586.89 FL 580585 578 579581 582 583 584586587 580585578 579581 582 583 584 586 587 588
588
590 590
587588
589
591 591 592 592 593 593 594 594 590589 591 592 593 594 591 592 593 594 594 590 589 588 591 587 588 587
588 589
586 592
592 589.80 LP 587
589
587 590591 (589.49) PATH (586.84) PATH 588 590 590 588 588 586584 582 588 588.22 588.26
589
586.25 586.25
586.25
586.25
587 POC CONNECT TO (E) 2" MAIN LINE, VERIFY LOCATION. MAINTAIN 2'-0" OFF EDGE OF PAVING EXISTING 2" MAIN LINE EXISTING 2" MAIN LINE 114" 112" 112" 114" 114" 1" 237.2112"128.6112" 2" 329.4112"424.8112" 1" 114" 114" 1" 1" CAP MAIN LINE, INSTALL IN ROUND IRRIGATION BOX. 2" 25° (likely) full trajectory of 45' CAP MAIN LINE, INSTALL IN ROUND IRRIGATION BOX. 1" 112" 1" 114" 114" 1" LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION HUNTER ICZ-151-XL-40 DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT. 1-1/2IN. ICV GLOBE VALVE WITH 1IN. HY100 FILTER SYSTEM. PRESSURE REGULATION: 40PSI. FLOW RANGE: 20 GPM TO 60 GPM. 120 MESH STAINLESS STEEL SCREEN. 1-1/2IN. INLET X SINGLE 2IN. OUTLET. IF DC LATCHING SOLENOID NOT INCLUDED, ORDER SEPARATELY, IF NEEDED, IN ORDER TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH HUNTER NODE BATTERY CONTROLLER. HUNTER NODE-200 2-STATION BATTERY-POWERED CONTROLLER TO BE INSTALLED INSIDE VALVE BOX PIPE TRANSITION POINT PIPE TRANSITION POINT FROM PVC LATERAL TO HUNTER HDL-06-12-CV DRIP LINE. RUN DRIP TUBING TO ALL PLANTS AND TREES WITHIN DASHED LINE BOUNDARY SHOWN ON PLANS. INSTALL TWO LINES TO EACH TREE/PLANT IN GROUPS OR ROWS, OR SINGLE LOOP, AS SHOWN IN DRIP IRRIGATION DETAILS. ALL DRIP LINE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON-GRADE. SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION HUNTER HQ-44LRC QUICK COUPLER VALVE QUICK COUPLER VALVE, YELLOW RUBBER LOCKING COVER, RED BRASS AND STAINLESS STEEL, WITH 1IN. NPT INLET, 2-PIECE BODY. ISOLATION VALVE ISOLATION VALVE - 2" AND SMALLER - WILKINS 850-XL FULL PORT BRONZE BALL VALVE. 2-1/2" AND LARGER - NIBCO 619-RW-SON FLANGED GATE VALVE WITH SQ. OP. NUT. SIZE PER PIPE SIZE. LOCATION SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY. INSTALL IN PLANTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 SCHEDULE 40 PVC AT 2X LINE SIZE FOR LATERALS, CONDUIT AND MAINLINE UNDER ALL PAVING, TYPICAL, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO PAVING INSTALLATION. WIRES AND MAINLINE SHALL BE PLACED ON SEPARATE SLEEVES. IRRIGATION SCHEDULE NORTH IRRIGATION PLAN L4.0 13 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L4.0-IRRG-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" = 40' LIMIT OF WORK JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND SYMBOL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE DRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSET FITTINGS, SLEEVES, ETC., WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY INVESTIGATE THE STRUCTURAL AND FINISHED CONDITIONS AFFECTING ALL OF THE WORK AND PLAN ACCORDINGLY, FURNISHING SUCH FITTINGS, MISCELLANEOUS COMPONENTS, ETC., AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO MEET SUCH CONDITIONS. DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATIVE OF THE WORK TO BE INSTALLED. THE WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE MOST DIRECT AND COMPETENT MANNER, SO THAT CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE IRRIGATION WATER SYSTEMS AND EXISTING AND NEW UTILITIES, PLANTING, AND ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES WILL BE AVOIDED. ROUTING OF MAIN LINE AND LATERALS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. INSTALL ALL MAINLINE, LATERALS AND VALVES IN PLANTERS EXCEPT WHEN CROSSING BENEATH PAVEMENT, WALK WAYS, ETC. ALL MAIN LINE AND LATERALS CROSSING BENEATH PAVEMENT, CONCRETE, FOUNDATIONS, WALLS, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SLEEVES. SEE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE. SIZE TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 25% VOID SPACE IN SLEEVE AFTER PIPES ARE INSTALLED. GRAPHIC CLARITY: 1. THIS SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR A MAXIMUM DEMAND OF 50 GPM AND 85 PSI AT POINT OF CONNECTION WITH A 6-HOUR WATER WINDOW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS. COORDINATE WITH OWNER TO REVIEW IRRIGATION SYSTEM PRIOR TO START OF WORK. IN THE EVENT THAT EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE DIFFERENT THAN STATED, CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE INTENT OF THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER REQUIRED TO SUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROGRAM THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER BASED ON RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE LANDSCAPE WATER AUDIT AND AS REQUIRED BY THE 2020 UPDATED MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 23, DIVISION 2, CHAPTER 2.7 AND EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE SCHEDULING ADJUSTMENTS AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THE MOST EFFICIENT APPLICATION OF WATER BASED ON PLANT TYPE, WATER USE REQUIREMENTS, SOIL TYPE, GRADES, SUN EXPOSURE, SHADE, WIND, ETC. 3. THIS DRAWING IS DIAGRAMMATIC. IRRIGATION COMPONENTS SHOWN BENEATH PAVING, UTILITIES, PLANTINGS, ETC. ARE FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. PLACE ALL PIPING, VALVES, AND OTHER IRRIGATION COMPONENTS WITHIN THE ADJACENT PLANTER EXCEPT WHERE PIPES CROSSOVER BENEATH PAVING, STRUCTURES, WALLS, ETC.. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE PIPING TO PREVENT CONFLICT WITH UTILITIES, TREE LOCATIONS, PLANTING, HARDSCAPE COMPONENTS, WATER PLAY FEATURES, PLAY AREAS AND FURNISHINGS. SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR PLANT COUNT AND LAYOUT. REFER TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR PROJECT SCOPE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COMPLETE RECORD DRAWINGS TO OWNER AT COMPLETION OF PROJECT AND AS REQUIRED BY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO OPERATE AT THE FOLLOWING PRESSURES: DRIP LINE - 40 PSI. ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR AT THE LOCATIONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DEVIATION WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SPACING OR LOCATION OF THE IRRIGATION LAYOUT. 6. TRENCH IRRIGATION MAIN LINES TO A DEPTH OF 24"; AND LATERALS TO A DEPTH OF 18". DO NOT TRENCH DRIPLINE AT ALL; LEAVE ON GRADE. TRENCH ALL MAIN AND LATERAL LINES TO A DEPTH OF 24" WHERE CROSSING BENEATH EXISTING PATH AND PLACE WITHIN SLEEVE, SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SLEEVE ALL MAIN LINES AND LATERAL LINES WHEN CROSSING BENEATH PAVEMENT, WALKWAYS, BUILDINGS, WALLS, ETC. WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON THE IRRIGATION PLAN. SIZE PER PLAN AND/OR AS NEEDED BASED ON THE NUMBER OF IRRIGATION LINES AND SIZES. CONTROL WIRES SHALL BE SLEEVED INDEPENDENTLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES TO INSTALL SLEEVES REQUIRED. 8. ALL IRRIGATION REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, QUICK COUPLER VALVES, ELECTRIC PULL BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTED AREAS AND IN VALVE BOXES. NO VALVES/VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PAVED AREAS OR IN TURF AREAS. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE GREEN, EXCEPT IF IN DECOMPOSED GRANITE, IN WHICH CASE THEY SHALL BE TAN COLOR. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE WATER AUDIT PER REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE 2015 UPDATED MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 23, DIVISION 2, CHAPTER2.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE FINAL ADJUSTMENTS TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM BASED ON LANDSCAPE WATER AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS. SEE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 10. MAIN LINE PIPE SIZE TO BE AS NOTED ON PLANS. LATERAL PIPE SIZE DOWNSTREAM OF LAST PIPE SIZE CALL OUT TO BE 1" PIPE. 11. SEE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 12. INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MINIMUM 2'-0" OFF EDGE OF PAVING IRRIGATION NOTES:

Page 516 of 750 ends

IRRIGATION BOX LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX 12" 12" 12" 12" TYPICAL EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE, CURB, BUILDING, ETC. NOTES: 1. CENTER VALVE BOX OVER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE TO FACILITATE SERVICING VALVE. 2. SET REMOTE CONTROL VALVE AND VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY IN LEVEL AREA OF PLANTER OR TURF AS SHOWN ON PLAN. NO IRRIGATION BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONCRETE, SIDEWALKS, PATHS, ROAD WAYS, ETC. 3. SET VALVE BOXES ON LEVEL BED, 6" DEEP OF 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK. PLACE 1/4" GALVANIZED WIRE MESH DIRECTLY BENEATH VALVE BOX ON TOP OF GRAVEL LEVELING BED. 4. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF LAWN, WALK, FENCE, CURB, BUILDING, ETC. 5. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND VALVE BOXES TO PREVENT COLLAPSE AND DEFORMATION OF VALVE BOX SIDES. 6. INSTALL VALVE BOX EXTENSION BY VALVE BOX MANUFACTURER AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE VALVE ASSEMBLY. 7. SET TOP OF BOX ABOVE SUB-GRADE: 3-1/4" FOR DECOMPOSED GRANITE AREAS; 1-1/2" IN TURF AREAS. SET VALVE BOX HEIGHT TO MATCH GRADE OF ADJACENT HARDSCAPE. 8. VALVE BOXES IN TURF SHALL BE GREEN, VALVE BOXES IN DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL BE TAN. 9. GROUP VALVES TOGETHER AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND NOT TO EXCEED 3 VALVE BOXES IN ONE LOCATION. STAKE LOCATION OF VALVES BOXES WITH DIMENSIONS OF AREA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10. NO VALVES OR VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN SIX (6) FEET OF AN EXITING OR NEW TREE LOCATION. TOP VIEW L4.1 2 IRRIGATION DETAILS L4.1 14 © MELTON DESIGN GROUP INC COPYRIGHT 2021 SHEET NUMBER MELTON DESIGN GROUP: PROJECT NUMBERS NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DATES SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANT CLIENT LICENSE 8. 1. 3. 2. 7. 4. 6. 5. 820 BROADWAY ST. CHICO, CA 95928 (530) 899-1616 meltondg.com SHEET ___ OF ___ CITY OF UKIAH RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION 2369 30% CD's 03-29-2022 PLOT DATE: April 16, 2024 - 10:06 AM FILE NAME: G:\MDG(2300-2399)\2369 Riverside Park Regeneration - Ukiah\2369 CAD\2369 CDs\SHEETS\2369-L4.0-IRRG-PLAN.dwg 90% CD's 08-18-2023 100% CD's 04-19-2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 SECTION VIEW NOTES: 1. GATE VALVES 2" AND SMALLER SHALL BE THREADED. 2. WHEN THE MAIN LINE IS TERMINATED AT THE VALVE, EXTEND MAIN LINE 48" BEYOND VALVE BOX AND CAP. 6" 6" 1 4 567891011122 6813 3 3" 1 FINISH GRADE SET TOP OF BOX ABOVE FINISH GRADE: 1/2" IN SEED, 1-1/2" IN SOD, 3-1/2" IN PLANTER OR DECOMPOSED GRANITE 2 ALLOW 3" BETWEEN TOP OF THE INTERIOR VALVE BOX COVER AND PVC PIPE 3 GREEN PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LOC-KIT; CARSON MODEL 910 OR APPROVED EQUAL 45 8" DIAMETER PVC PIPE; LENGTH AS NEEDED 6 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK; 6" MINIMUM DEPTH BALL VALVE, SIZE PER PIPE SIZE; WITH BRONZE CROSS HANDLE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 7 PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR CLASS 315 MAIN LINE AS PER PLAN 89 PVC SCHEDULE 40 COUPLER 10 PVC SCHEDULE 80 T.O.E. NIPPLE 11 1/4" GALVANIZED WIRE CLOTH WRAP ALL PVC PIPE EXPOSED TO CRUSHED ROCK WITH 20MIL CORROSION RESISTANT TAPE. 12 SAND BACKFILL; 6" ABOVE AND BELOW MAIN LINES 13 GATE VALVE L4.1 NOT TO SCALE 3 1 3 4 5 6 8 791011 12 1415 16 17 18 1920 21 2 13 QUICK COUPLER VALVE NOT TO SCALE 1 FINISH GRADE SET TOP OF BOX ABOVE SUBGRADE: 2-1/4" DECOMPOSED GRANITE; 1-1/2" IN TURF. SET VALVE BOX HEIGHT TO MATCH GRADE OF ADJACENT HARDSCAPE 2 QUICK COUPLING VALVE WITH LOCKING YELLOW RUBBER COVER 34 SET VALVE BOX 12" MIN. FROM EDGE OF HARDSCAPE 5 CURB, HEADER OR PAVING WHERE APPLICABLE CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH TL STYLE LOCKING COVER 6 MANUFACTURED TRIPLE SWING JOINT, KBI MODEL TSA-1000- TT OR APPROVED EQUAL 7 SELF RESTRAINED FITTINGS; LEEMCO SERIES RF OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 8 9 PVC MAIN LINE; TYPE AND SIZE PER PLAN 10 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK, 6" MINIMUM DEPTH 11 1/4" GALVANIZED WIRE CLOTH 1-1/2" ANGLE IRON; SECURE TO QUICK COUPLER VALVE WITH STAINLESS STEEL HOSE CLAMPS AND SCREWS (TYP. 2 PLCS.) 12 SAND BACKFILL; 6" ABOVE AND 6" BELOW MAIN LINE WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 13 UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OR COMPACTED BACKFILL PER SPECIFICATIONS 1415 PVC SCHEDULE 80 NIPPLE; LENGTH AS NEEDED STAINLESS STEEL HOSE CLAMP WITH STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS (TYP. 2 PLCS.) 16 1" FULL PORT BALL VALVE; INSTALL WITH MIN. 6" CLEARANCE ABOVE GRAVEL SO LEVER HANDLE CAN OPEN AND CLOSE FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 17 DISTANCE BETWEEN QUICK COUPLER COVER AND TOP OF VALVE BOX SHALL ALLOW QUICK COUPLER KEY TO ROTATE IN FULL CIRCLE WITHOUT INTERFERENCE. 18 12" HDPE SMOOTH INTERIOR WALL PIPE SLEEVE. INSTALL WITH SQUARE CUT 4" ABOVE GRAVEL INSIDE VALVE BOX WITH ENOUGH ROOM TO OPERATE BALL VALVE. 19 T.CHRISTY ID TAG MODEL ID-MAX-B2-NP012. ATTACH TO VALVE STEM USING NYLON CABLE TIE. 20 WRAP MAIN LINE TRENCH IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, INSTALL 6" SAND BELOW AND ABOVE MAINLINE, OVERLAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ON TOP, BACKFILL WITH APPROVED MATERIAL. TYPICAL FOR MAIN LINE TRENCH. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 21 L4.1 4 DRIP FLUSH VALVE NOT TO SCALE AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION PVC EXHAUST HEADER OR DRIP LINE PER PLAN GEO-TEXTILE FILTER FABRIC; ENCASE DRAIN SUMP AND STAPLE TO EXTERIOR OF VALVE BOX. 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK DRAIN SUMP; 2' DIA. X 2' DEPTH. FINISH GRADE - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 8 6 2 4 6 1 3 4" BACKFILL LAYER; COMPACTED TO SAME DENSITY AS SUBGRADE ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX CARSON MODEL 708 GREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL 5 7 12345678 L4.1 9 SECTION VIEW 24" 6" 1 34278 TRENCHING 5 6 6" 18" 1 FINISH GRADE PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. APPROVED BACKFILL PER PLANTING PLAN. 2 SAND BACKFILL, MINIMUM 6" ABOVE AND BELOW MAIN LINE WITH MINIMUM 6" BACKFILL. 3 MAIN LINE DETECTION TAPE: T.CHRISTY MODEL TA-DT-3-BIRR OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSTALL ABOVE IRRIGATION MAIN LINE PIPE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 4 PVC SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT WITH WIRE CABLE AND PULL TAPE, SIZE PER PLANS. 5 WIDTH AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM 4" HORIZONTAL SEPARATION FROM PIPE TO PIPE AND PIPE TO TRENCH WALL. NO PIPE SHALL BE LAID OVER ANOTHER. 6 IRRIGATION MAIN LINE. SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN. 24" MINIMUM COVER. 7 PVC LATERAL, SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN. 18" MINIMUM COVER. 8 L4.1 NOT TO SCALE 1 AIR RELIEF VALVE NOT TO SCALE 2 1 3 5 4 67 8 9 1 DRIP LINE, BLANK DRIP TUBING, OR PVC EXHAUST HEADER, PER PLANS 2 DRIPLINE TEE ADAPTER 3 3/4" X 1/2" REDUCER BUSHING AIR RELIEF VALVE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION. INSTALL AT HIGH POINTS ON DRIP LINE 45 FINISH GRADE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN GEO-TEXTILE FILTER FABRIC; SURROUND AGGREGATE AND STAPLE TO EXTERIOR OF VALVE BOX. 6 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK; 6" DEPTH. EXTEND 6" BEYOND VALVE BOX IN ALL DIRECTIONS. 78 ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX CARSON MODEL 708 GREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL 9 UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE L4.1 10 15 5 8 17 13 12 17 4 20 6 18 24" MIN. 14 11 19 2" 12" FROM HARDSCAPE 8673541 15 3" PVC SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT 3" PVC SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT SWEEP, COUPLED BOTH ENDS 1617 181213141110 9 19 TRIM VALVE BOX TO PROVIDE 1" CLEARANCE OVER PIPE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY; NORMALLY OPEN. SIZE AND MODEL PER PLAN. FINISH GRADE - SEE GRADING PLAN. PVC LATERAL LINE; SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN. PROVIDE 18" LENGTH PRIOR TO FIRST FITTING. SCHEDULE 80 PVC UNION, SXS (TYP. 2 PLCS.) PVC SCHEDULE-80 90 DEG ELBOW, SXS PVC SCHEDULE 80 T.O.E. NIPPLE, LENGTH AS NEEDED, MIN. 6" LENGTH PVC MAIN LINE; SIZE AND TYPE PER PLAN. 24" MINIMUM COVER. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK; 6" DEPTH. EXTEND 6" BEYOND VALVE BOX IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SCHEDULE 80 PVC TEE (SxSxS) 1/4" GALVANIZED WIRE CLOTH - INSTALL ON TOP OF CRUSHED DRAIN ROCK 6" BEYOND EDGE OF VALVE BOX IN ALL DIRECTIONS 2 LOCKING WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTOR, DBR/Y-6 OR APPROVED EQUAL. SAND BACKFILL; 6" ABOVE AND 6" BELOW MAIN LINE, PER SPECIFICATIONS 20 SET TOP OF BOX ABOVE SUBGRADE: 3-1/4" DECOMPOSED GRANITE; 1-1/2" IN TURF. SET VALVE BOX HEIGHT TO MATCH GRADE OF ADJACENT HARDSCAPE. 21 PVC SCHEDULE 80 ELBOW, SXS 22 3" PVC SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT RISER. INSTALL COUPLERS AT END, CLR 2" ABOVE DRAIN ROCK 3 16 12 GA COMMON WIRE (WHITE), 14 GA CONTROL WIRE (RED) PER SPECIFICATIONS - PROVIDE 24" SPARE LOOP WRAPPED NEAT ALONG INTERIOR VALVE BOX. INSTALL (1) SPARE 12 GA COMMON WIRE (GREEN) AND (1) SPARE 14 GA CONTROL WIRE (YELLOW) ALONG ENTIRE MAIN LINE AND LOOPED INTO EACH VALVE BOX. 21 T.CHRISTY ID TAG MODEL ID-STD-Y2; YELLOW PRINTED WITH CONTROLLER/VALVE NUMBER ON 2 SIDES AND ID-MAX-B2-NP012. ATTACH BOTH TAGS TO VALVE STEM USING NYLON CABLE TIE. 6" 23 PVC SCH80 BALL VALVE, SIZE PER VALVE SIZE 12 CARSON PLASTIC VALVE BOX 1220 WITH LOCK KIT AND L-BOLT, GREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL. VALVE BOX TO BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ENCLOSE ENTIRE VALVE ASSEMBLY. LID MARKED IRRIGATION. 2 12 23 22 24 24 HEIGHT BELOW GRADE TO ALLOW MIN. 3" CLR FROM VALVE TO BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX LID. USE PVC 45 DEG ELBOWS DOWNSTREAM OF VALVE TO OBTAIN 18" COVER ON LATERALS. HY100 SCREEN FILTER, 100 MESH 12 9 9 25 25 REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE ASSEMBLY SECTION VIEW NOT TO SCALE 5L4.1 PIPE TRANSITION POINT TO DRIP LINE 4" 18" NOTE: SECURE DRIP LINE TO FINISH GRADE USING 6" WIRE STAPLES INSTALL WIRE STAPLES EVERY THREE (3) FEET. 12345678 9 SECTION VIEW 1 FINISH GRADE- SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 2 DRIP LINE TEE DRIP LINE ON SURFACE WHERE OCCURS; DRIP LINE MANUFACTURER PER PLAN 34 BLANK TUBING, LENGTH AS NEEDED 5 3/4" MALE ADAPTER 6 PVC SCHEDULE 40 SUB HEADER PVC SCHEDULE 40 TEE WITH 3/4" THREADED OUTLET 7 UNIFORMLY PREPARED SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY. SEE DRIP LINE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 89 4" APPROVED BACKFILL L4.1 NOT TO SCALE 6 TREES/SHRUBS DRIP - TWO LINES NOT TO SCALE 23 SECTION VIEW 5 1 7 6 10 9 8 11 NOTES: 1. ALL DRIPLINE SHALL BE LEFT ON GRADE 2. BLANK LEADER NOT TO EXCEED 48" IN LENGTH 3. LOCATE DRIP LINE WITHIN WATER RETENTION BERM. INSTALL MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 6" FROM BASE OF SHRUB/TREE 4. ALL DRIP LINE/BLANK TUBING JOINTS SHALL HAVE BARB FITTINGS AS NEEDED 12 PLAN VIEW 8 6" 6" 4 8111 BLANK DRIP LINE TO PVC LATERAL AND IN BETWEEN DRIP LINE RUNS AS NEEDED; NOT TO EXCEED 48" IN LENGTH, WITH 6" GALVANIZED STAPLES EVERY 36" AND AT JOINTS DRIP LINE - MANUFACTURER AND MODEL PER PLAN. INSTALL TWO LINES WITH ALTERNATING EMITTER PATTERN. TRANSITION. SEE PIPE TRANSITION POINT TO DRIP LINE DETAIL PVC LATERAL LINE 5 WATER RETENTION BERM AS PER PLANTING PLAN 4231 PLANTING HOLE BACKFILL MIX PER PLANTING PLAN TOP DRESSING PER PLANTING PLAN SHRUB/TREE PLANTING PER PLANTING PLAN FINISH GRADE 10 NATIVE SUBGRADE 987611 RUN DRIP LINE 6" FROM CENTER OF EACH TREE/SHRUB ON BOTH SIDES DRIP FLUSH VALVE AT END OF EACH DRIP LINE RUN, SEE FLUSH VALVE DETAIL 12 32 L4.1 7 SHRUB/TREE BASE 9" BLANK PE TUBING PER PLANS INLINE EMITTER DRIP TUBING, PER PLANS. 5 EMITTERS PER DRIP LINE LOOP AT 12" O.C. EMITTER SPACING. TOTAL 0.05 GPM PER LOOP IF EACH EMITTER IS 0.6 GPH 6" GALVANIZED SOIL STAPLE, TYP. 5 PLACES ON LOOP, AT EACH JOINT, AND EVERY 36" ON BLANK PE TUBING TREES/SHRUBS DRIP - SINGLE LOOP BARB-TO-BARB COUPLING, HUNTER 17MM PLD-CPL OR EQUAL TO OTHER SHRUBS/TREES AND/OR PIPE TRANSITION POINT. INSTALL FLUSH VALVE AT ENDS OF EACH DRIP RUN, SEE FLUSH VALVE DETAIL. PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1. INSTALL LOOP AT A DISTANCE OF 9" FROM PLANT CENTER. NOT TO SCALE 8L4.1

Page 517 of 750 ends

RIVERSIDE PARK REGENERATION PROJECT
CITY OF UKIAH PROJECT NO. 24-05

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIVISION 2 SITE CONSTRUCTION
02100 DEMOLITION
02230 SITE CLEARING
02260 LANDSCAPE GRADING
02300 EARTHWORKS
02315 WETLAND GRADING
02811 IRRIGATION
02905 LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION
02905.10 HYDROSEED
02970 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
Attachment 2

Page 518 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02100
August 2023 Demolition
02100 - 1
SECTION 02100

DEMOLITION
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 DESCRIPTION
A. Work includes, but is not limited to the following:

1. The Contractor shall provide all equipment, tools, materials, and labor necessary to complete the Work.

2. Completely coordinate with Work of all other trades.

3. Provide protection for all existing objects or conditions designated on the Drawings to remain on the site.

4. Provide protection to prevent injury or damage to persons or adjacent properties.

5. Remove and dispose of debris piles from the site as indicated in the drawings.

6. Comply with applicable codes and ordinances concerning demolition operations.

B. Definition: The term "demolition", as used herein, includes the removal and disposal of all existing objects (except for those objects designated to remain) down to the existing grade level or sub-grade level to the extent indicated on the plans or as otherwise required to permit new construction and all other Work as described in this Section necessary to complete all Demolition Work.

C. Use of explosives will not be permitted.

D. Related Attachment: Soil Sampling Report June 2022

1.02 PERMITS, ORDINANCES, ETC.

Procure and pay for all necessary permits or certificates required to complete the Demolition Work specified. Make any and all required notifications and comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Local ordinances concerning demolition operations.

1.03 JOB CONDITIONS
Visit the site and examine the existing conditions and observe the conditions under which the Work is to be performed. Notify the Owner’s Representative of unsatisfactory conditions and do not proceed with the Work until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected in a manner acceptable to the Owner’s Representative.

Note all conditions as to character and extent of Work involved.

Page 519 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02100
August 2023 Demolition
02100 - 2

1.04 PROTECTION
A. Execute all Demolition Work in an orderly and careful manner with due consideration for any existing condition designated to remain. Provide protection to preserve existing items indicated to remain and to prevent injury or damage to persons or adjacent properties.

B. Use all means necessary to protect existing conditions designated to remain and adjacent properties. Avoid any encroachment on adjacent properties. In the event of damage or loss to any existing condition designated to remain or adjacent properties, immediately make all repairs and replacements necessary to the approval of the City at no additional cost to City.

C. Do not interfere with the normal traffic on roads, streets, walks, or use of adjacent properties. Provide alternate routes around closed or obstructed traffic ways as required by governing regulations.

D. Protect existing trees per plans

1.05 CUTTING AND PATCHING
Cut existing sidewalks, roads, and curbs as required to complete Demolition Work.

Pavement shall be cut vertically along straight lines forming the edges of the Demolition Work and so as not to damage the adjacent pavement. Repair all pavement as specified in Sections of the specification covering the applicable trades.

1.06 DUST CONTROL
Use all means necessary to prevent the spread of dust during performance of the Work of this Section; thoroughly moisten all surfaces as required to prevent dust being a nuisance to the public, neighbors, and concurrent performance of other work on the site.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 OTHER MATERIALS
All other materials not specifically described but required for proper completion of the Work of this Section, shall be as selected by the Contractor subject to approval by the Owner’s Representative.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 PREPARATION
A. Notification - Notify the Owner’s Representative at least two (2) full working days prior to commencing the Work of this Section.

Page 520 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02100
August 2023 Demolition
02100 - 3
B. Site Observation

1. Prior to all Work of this Section, carefully observe the entire site for all objects designated to be removed and to be preserved.

2. Contact the Underground Service Alert (U.S.A.) at 1-800-642-2444 to stake and mark the location of all existing utilities prior to the beginning of Work.

3. Locate all existing utility lines indicated on the Drawings to remain and determine the requirements for their protection.

4. Locate, if any, all-existing utility line indicated on the Drawings to be disconnected and capped and determine all requirements for disconnecting and capping.

C. Clarification

1. The Drawings do not purport to show all objects existing on the site.

2. Before commencing the Work of this Section, verify with the Owner’s Representative all objects to be removed and all objects to preserve.

D. Scheduling

1. Schedule all Work in a careful manner with all necessary consideration for adjacent properties and the general public.

2. Avoid interference with the use of, and passage to and from adjacent properties.

3. Conduct operations so as not to interfere with the use of adjacent roads, streets, drives, walks, service lines, etc.

E. Disconnection of Utilities
Before starting site construction, arrange for the disconnection of all utility lines designated to be removed, relocated, or capped with the appropriate utility company. Utility company services for this Work shall be paid for by the Contractor.

F. Protection of Utilities
Retain and protect in operating condition all active utilities traversing the site designated to remain.

Page 521 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02100
August 2023 Demolition
02100 - 4

3.02 DEMOLITION OF OBJECTS
A. Remove and dispose of all existing objects (except for those objects designated to remain) down to existing grade level or subgrade level to the extent indicated or as otherwise required to permit new construction.

3.03 BACKFILL AND COMPACTION
All excavations left by the Demolition Work shall be filled and compacted to make the surface at these points conform in contour and density to that of the surrounding ground, and as specified in Geotechnical report.

3.04 DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS
A. All material removed under this Contract, which is not to be salvaged or reused, or otherwise specified on the Plan shall become the property of the Contractor and be promptly disposed of. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to procure dumping facilities or other means of disposal for all items specified to be removed from the site. Storing or permitting refuse to accumulate on the site will not be permitted.

B. Disposal of all materials from the site shall be done in a lawful manner. Transport all refuse materials from the site without spilling on the streets.

C. Burning of refuse material on the site will not be permitted.

END OF SECTION

Page 522 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02230
April 2024 Site Clearing
02230-1
SECTION 02230

SITE CLEARING
PART 1 GENERAL

1.01 SCOPE OF WORK
A. Furnish all labor, material, equipment and services necessary to provide all work, complete in place, as indicated on Drawings and specified herein.

Work specified in this Section includes, but is not limited to the following:

1. Site preparation.

2. Tree protection.

3. Restore damaged improvementsto original condition.

4. Existing Utilities.

5. Clearing and Grubbing.

6. Removing topsoil.

7. Removing existing improvements.

8. Backfill requirements.

9. Disposing of objectionable material.

B. Related Work Specified in Other Sections

1. SECTION 02300 – EARTHWORK.

C. Related Documents

3. Section 31 1000 – Site Clearing.

D. Definitions

1. ANSI: American National Standards Institute.

Page 523 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02230
April 2024 Site Clearing
02230-2

2. CAL-OSHA: California Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

3. Topsoil: Natural or cultivated surface-soil layer containing organic matter and sand, silt, and clay particles; friable, pervious, and black or a darker shade of brown, gray, or red than underlying subsoil; reasonably free of subsoil, clay lumps, gravel, and other objects more than 2-inches in diameter; and free of weeds, roots, and other deleterious materials.

1.02 SUBMITTALS
A. Project Record Documents: Record actual locations of pipe mains, valve, connections and invert elevations. Identify and describe unexpected variations to subsoil conditions or discovery of uncharted utilities.

1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Do not remove or prune trees without written approval from Owner.

B. Prune to the standards of the International Society of Arborists and to ANSI 300.

1.04 PROJECT CONDITIONS
A. Except for materialsindicated to be stockpiled or to remain the Owner’s property, cleared materials are the Contractor's property. Remove cleared materials from site and dispose of in lawful manner.

B. Unidentified Materials; if unidentified materials are discovered, including hazardous materials that will require additional removal other than is required by the Contract Documents, immediately report the discovery to the Owner.

C. If necessary, the Owner will arrange for any testing or analysis of the discovered materials and will provide instructions regarding the removal and disposal of the unidentified materials.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.01 SOIL MATERIALS
A. Backfill excavations resulting from demolition operations with on-site or import materials conforming to structural backfill defined in Section 02300 – Earthwork.

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.01 SITE PREPARATION
A. Protect and maintain benchmarks and survey control points during construction.

Page 524 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02230
April 2024 Site Clearing
02230-3
B. Locate and clearly flag trees and vegetation to remain or to be relocated.

C. Protect existing site improvementsto remain during construction.

D. Verify existing conditions at the site and include all work evident by site inspection whether or not shown on the Drawings.

3.02 TREE PROTECTION
A. Erect and maintain temporary fence around drip line of individual trees or around perimeter drip line of groups of trees to remain. Remove fence when construction is complete.

B. Do not store construction materials, debris, or excavated material within drip line of remaining trees.

C. Do not permit vehicles or equipment within drip line of remaining trees.

D. Do not excavate within drip line of remaining trees, unless otherwise indicated.

E. Where excavation for new construction is required within drip line of trees, hand clear and excavate to minimize damage to root systems. Use narrow-tine spading forks, comb soil to expose roots, and cleanly cut roots as close to excavation edge as possible.

1. Cover exposed roots with burlap and water regularly.

2. Temporarily support and protect roots from damage until they are permanently relocated and covered with soil.

3. Coat cut faces of roots more than 1-1/2-inches in diameter with an emulsified asphalt or other approved coating formulated for use on damaged plant tissues.

4. Cover exposed roots with wet burlap to prevent roots from drying out. Backfill with soil as soon as possible.

F. Also see Tree Protection requirements outlined on Construction Drawings.

3.03 RESTORATION
A. Restore damaged improvementsto their original condition, as acceptable to the Owner.

B. Repair or replace trees and vegetation indicated to remain that are damaged by construction operations, as directed by the Owner.

1. Employ a qualified, licensed arborist, to submit details of proposed repairs and to repair damage to trees and shrubs.

2. Replace trees that cannot be repaired and restored to full-growth status, as

Page 525 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02230
April 2024 Site Clearing
02230-4
determined by the Owner.

3.04 UTILITIES
A. Locate, identify, disconnect, and seal or cap off utilities indicated to be removed or abandoned.

B. Arrange to shut off indicated utilities with utility companies or verify that utilities have been shut off.

C. Existing Utilities: Do not interrupt utilities serving facilities occupied by Owner or others unless authorized in writing by the Owner, and then only after arranging to provide temporary utility services according to requirements indicated.

D. Coordinate utility interruptions with utility company affected.

E. Do not proceed with utility interruptions without the permission of the Owner and utility company affected. Notify Owner and utility company affected two working days prior to utility interruptions.

F. Excavate and remove underground utilities that are indicated to be removed.

G. Securely close ends of abandoned piping with tight fitting plug or wall of concrete minimum 6-inches thick.

3.05 CLEARING AND GRUBBING
A. Clear the site and remove obstructions, shrubs, grass, and other vegetation to permit installation of new construction. Removal includes digging out stumps and obstructions and grubbing roots.

B. Remove trash, debris, logs, concrete, masonry and other waste materials.

C. Do not remove trees,shrubs, and other vegetation indicated to remain or to be relocated.

D. Completely remove stumps, roots, obstructions, and debris extending to a depth of 18- inches below subgrade.

E. Use only hand methods for grubbing within drip line of remaining trees.

F. In areas not to be further excavated, fill depressions resulting from site clearing. Place and compact satisfactory soil materials per the geotechnical investigation report.

G. Clear undergrowth and deadwood without disturbing subsoil.

3.06 TOPSOIL STRIPPING
A. Remove sod and grass before stripping topsoil.

Page 526 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02230
April 2024 Site Clearing
02230-5
B. Strip topsoil to whatever depths are encountered in a manner to prevent intermingling with underlying subsoil or other waste materials.

C. Remove trash, debris, weeds, roots, and other waste materials.

D. Stockpile topsoil materials designated to remain on site at a location approved by the Owner at a location away from edge of excavations without intermixing with subsoil.

Grade and shape stockpiles to drain surface water. Cover to prevent windblown dust.

E. Do not stockpile topsoil within drip line of remaining trees.

3.07 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
A. Remove existing above- and below-grade improvements as indicated and as necessary to facilitate new construction.

B. Remove slabs, paving, curbs, and gutters, as indicated. Where concrete slabs, curb, gutter and asphalt pavements are designated to be removed, remove bases and subbase to surface of underlying, undisturbed soil.

C. Unless the existing full-depth joints coincide with line of pavement demolition, neatly saw-cut to full depth the length of existing pavement to remain before removing existing pavement. Saw-cut faces vertically.

D. Remove driveways, curbs, gutters and sidewalks by saw cutting to full depth. If saw cut falls within 30-inches of a construction joint, expansions joint, score mark or edge, remove material to joint, mark or edge.

3.08 BACKFILL
A. Place and compact material in excavations and depressionsremaining after site clearing in conformance with Section 02300 – Earthwork.

3.09 DISPOSAL
A. Remove surplus unsuitable soil material, unsuitable topsoil, obstructions, demolished materials, and waste materials, including trash and debris, and legally dispose of them off the Owner’s property.

END OF SECTION

Page 527 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02260
August 2023 Landscape Grading
02260-1
SECTION 02260

LANDSCAPE GRADING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 WORK INCLUDED
A. Provide all labor, materials services and equipment indicated on Drawings and/or herein specified to complete all Landscape Grading Work B. Landscape grading shall consist of using floodplain and wetland excavation soil to create landscape berming, ripping, establishing finish grade to conform to the contours, grades, line and shapes of rough grades established on grading plans. Work may also include loosening of compacted soils created during the course of construction.

C. Land alteration of existing topographic conditions to conform to the contours, grades, lines and shapes indicated on Construction Drawings.

D. Contractor shall furnish, place and settle all required backfill material to conform to the contours, grades, lines and shapes as indicated on the Drawings.

1.02 RELATED WORK

A. SECTION 02905 - LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION
B. SECTION 02315 – WETLAND GRADING
C. Related Attachment: Soil Sampling Report June 2022

1.03 DEFINITIONS
A. Finish grade: Finish grade: Finish grade shall mean the establishment of grades to .04 feet plus or minus.

B. Grading intent: Spot elevations (grades) and contours are indicated based on the best available data. The drawings are referenced to provide site grading data. The intent is to maintain constant slopes between spot elevations. If a spot elevation is determined to be in error, or if the difference in elevation between points changes, contact the City immediately for field adjustments of spot elevations.

1.04 JOB CONDITIONS
A. Visit the project site and examine the existing conditions under which the Work is to be performed. Note all conditions, as to character and extent of Work involved. This may include pot holing to determine depth of bedrock.

B. In areas of proposed soil excavation the material to be removed is believed to consist of clays, silts, sands, concrete, debris, cobble, and unknown fill material. The Owner

Page 528 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02260
August 2023 Landscape Grading
02260-2
has no knowledge of the existence of artificial obstructions of a size or character that would necessitate the use of special equipment for their removal.

1.05 EXISTING UTILITIES
A. Contractor is responsible to contact U.S.A (800-227-2600) to stake and mark the location of all existing utilities before commencing Work. Pothole as required to determine and verify location and depth.

B. Retain and protect in operating condition all active utilities traversing the site designated to remain.

1.06 PROTECTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS and ADJACENT PROPERTIES A. Use all means necessary to protect existing conditions designated to remain, newly constructed conditions and adjacent properties. Avoid any encroachment on adjacent properties.

B. Prevent damage to existing benchmarks, pavement, and utility lines. In the event of damage or loss immediately make all repairs and replacements required to the City's approval at no additional cost to the City.

1.07 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Finish grade shall conform to contours, grades, lines and shapes, as indicated on Architect’s Drawings, with uniform slopes between finish grades or between finish grades and existing grades.

B. Establish finish landscape grades in a continuous, uniform line, resulting in a uniform surface with no ridges, birdbaths or low spots.

C. Finish landscape grade tolerance shall be .04 feet plus or minus of final grades indicated on Drawings.

D. Slope grade away from structures a minimum of two (2) percent in five (5) feet horizontal distance unless otherwise indicated on Drawings, or Architect’s plans.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 ONSITE MATERIAL
A. Suitable existing onsite soil excavated from floodplain per SECTION 02315 – WETLAND GRADING shall be used as fill material.

Page 529 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02260
August 2023 Landscape Grading
02260-3
PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 GENERAL
A. Conduct work in an orderly manner. Dirt shall not be permitted to accumulate on streets or sidewalks or to be washed into storm drains.

B. Use all means required to prevent the erosion of freshly graded areas during construction and until such a time as proposed hard surfaces and landscaping have been constructed.

C. Excess on site material after material has been used to bring site to finished grade shall be removed and legally disposed of off site.

D. If there is not enough site material to bring site to grade, contractor shall import topsoil.

3.02 RIPPING
A. If, during the course of construction, landscape areas become compacted to greater than 90% relative density, landscape areas with the exception of areas beneath the canopies of existing trees shall be ripped and cross-ripped to a depth of 12 inches.

B. Rip and cross rip to a depth of 12 inches all areas exposed by engineering cut operations.

C. Rip to a depth of 12 inches: all areas to receive fill soil and all areas where existing asphalt was removed.

3.04 FINISH LANDSCAPE GRADING
A. Finish grade shall conform, after settling, to shapes, spot elevations and contours as indicated on Architect’s Drawings, with uniform levels or slopes between finish elevations or between finish elevations and existing elevations.

B. All fill shall be compacted to between 85 and 90 percent relative compaction at a moisture content of at least 3 percent over the optimum moisture content. During all compacting operations, the Contractor shall maintain optimum moisture content so that the specified relative compaction is obtained in each lift as the lift is compacted.

Maintain moisture content uniform throughout the lift. Fill compaction by ponding and jetting will not be permitted.

C. Fine grade all planting areas to a smooth, loose and uniform surface. Remove all asphalt and dispose of offsite. Remove all concrete found in specified grading areas to create a smooth surface. Finish grades shall slope to drain, without water pockets

Page 530 of 750 ends

Riverside Park Regeneration Project Section 02260
August 2023 Landscape Grading
02260-4
or irregularities (humps or hollows). Grades shall be a uniform slope between points of fixed elevation establishing vertical curves at abrupt changes in slope.

D. Hydroseed areas shall be graded one inch below adjacent paved areas, sidewalks, valve boxes, headers, drains, etc. in order to receive hydroseed.

3.05 FINISH LANDSCAPE GRADING OBSERVATION
A. Soil preparation: comply with SECTION 02905 - LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION prior to finish grading operations
B. Finish grade shall conform, after compaction, to shapes, spot elevations and contours as indicated on Drawings, with uniform levels or slopes between finish elevations or between finish elevations and existing elevations.

C. The project may not be accepted as complete if finished grade is outside the limits of the tolerances for landscape grading. The Owner’s Representative may require the Contractor to conduct additional work at his expense to complete excavation and fill to the lines and grades indicated, within these tolerances, and conduct surveying to demonstrate conformance with the desired finished grades.

C. The Contractor is responsible to spread excess excavated soil material from plant pits in surrounding areas.

D. Fine grade topsoil in all planting areas eliminating rough and low areas to insure positive drainage, to a smooth, loose and uniform surface. Maintain levels, profiles and contours of sub-grades.

END OF SECTION

Page 531 of 750 ends

Ukiah City CouncilMay 15, 2024

Ukiah City Council
May 15, 2024