Agenda packet — Ukiah City Council, June 18, 2025 (part 3 of 3)

!!! Major Towns & Places
Public Roads
Railroads
!!!
Ukiah
M
ASO
N ST
REET

EAST PERKINS STREET
H
O
S
PIT
A
L
D
RIV
E
N
O
R
T
H ST
A
TE ST
REET
N
O
R
T
H
M
AIN
S
T
R
E
E
T

EAST CLAY STREET
S
O
U
T
H
M
AIN
S
T
R
E
E
T

EAST SMITH STREET
S
O
U
T
H
S
TAT
E
S
T
R
E
E
T

EAST STANDLEY STREET
S
O
U
T
H
S
C
H
O
OL S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
R
T
H
S
C
H
O
O
L
S
T
R
E
E
T

WEST CHURCH STREET

HENRY STREET

WEST PERKINS STREET

WE ST SMITH STREET

WEST CLAY STREET
Northwestern Pacific Railroad
Northwestern Pacific Railroad
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community CASE:

OWNER:

APN:

APLCT:

AGENT:

ADDRESS:

ROHRER, Timothy & Carrie
002-192-24
241 E Perkins St., Ukiah
THIS MAP AND DATA ARE PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. DO NOT USE THIS MAP TO DETERMINE LEGAL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES µ 0 112.5 225 Feet
0 0.02 0.04 Miles
1:2,500

AERIAL IMAGERY

Page 371 of 432 ends

Public Roads

EAST PERKINS STREET

EAST STANDLEY STREET
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community CASE:

OWNER:

APN:

APLCT:

AGENT:

ADDRESS:

AERIAL IMAGERY

Page 372 of 432 ends

Assessors Parcels Ukiah Airport Zones 052021
ZONE
4 6
6 4
6 CASE:

OWNER:

APN:

APLCT:

AGENT:

ADDRESS:

UKIAH AIRPORT ZONES

Page 373 of 432 ends

Assessors Parcels
Cross-Sections
Base Flood Elevations
General Structures
Structure Type
Flood Structure
)
) )
) Bridge
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodway

0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD Zone X
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
629 FEET
628 FEET
611 FEET
627
FEET
631 FEET
610 FEET
622
FEET
621 FEET
634 FEET
626
FEET
620 FEET
624 FEET
618 FEET
612
FEET
627 FEET
610 FEET
F
G
E
628.58 FEET
632.38
FEET
6 2

6.2 8
F
E
E
T
619.58 FE
E
T
612.18 FEET
CASE:

OWNER:

APN:

APLCT:

AGENT:

ADDRESS:

FLOOD ZONES

Page 374 of 432 ends

!!! Major Towns & Places
Estimated Inundation Zones
Assessors Parcels
!!!
Ukiah
CASE:

OWNER:

APN:

APLCT:

AGENT:

ADDRESS:

DAM INUNDATION ZONES

Page 375 of 432 ends

Assessors Parcels
210
123
CASE:

OWNER:

APN:

APLCT:

AGENT:

ADDRESS:

EASTERN SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS

Page 376 of 432 ends

Page 377 of 432 ends

Page 378 of 432 ends

Suspect Asbestos Sample Results for Demolition
From: Air Environmental LLC
P.O. Box 294
Santa Rosa, Ca 95402
To: Attn: Amanda Archer
R&M Construction Services
Date: 3-10-25
Address: 214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
Date of testing: 3-7-25
Per your request, Air Environmental performed suspect asbestos bulk sampling at the above referenced location. The purpose of this sample collection was to ascertain the presence or absence of asbestos in the suspect, Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material (PACM) / Asbestos Containing Building Material (ACBM), and Asbestos Containing Construction Material (ACCM) (Any manufactured construction material which contains more than one tenth of 1 percent asbestos “trace” by weight), that will be disturbed during demolition and other work activities.

This sample collection does not include any areas other than the areas and materials listed in this report. If additional hidden materials are found such as transite inside walls or post tension cable sheathing in foundations please stop all work and call us for additional testing. (see attached chain of custody forms and sampling area plan for listed sample locations) During the course of this asbestos inspection (37) bulk samples were collected with the subsequent analysis of (68) discrete samples. The samples collected were cataloged on site and then delivered, Via FedEx, to Environmental Testing Laboratories for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM¹). The analysis of the samples showed asbestos present in sample numbers listed on page 2. (also see attached laboratory report) Air Environmental did not sample materials that were visibly identified as non-asbestos (fibrous glass, foam rubber, wood, etc.).

An asbestos survey consisted of three steps: 1) a visual inspection of the site. 2) a determination of homogeneous areas with suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials. 3) sampling friable and non-friable suspect materials if found.

Page 379 of 432 ends

Sample Analysis
Sample # Location Description Asbestos %
B1-B7 layer 2 Main Room Wall & Ceiling Drywall Texture 3.5% Chrysotile B8-B10 layer 2 Bathrooms Wall & Ceiling Drywall Texture 1.5% Chrysotile B14-B15 layer 2 Men & Womens Bathroom Wall Wallpaper Glue Trace Chrysotile B24-B25 layer 1 Main Room Floor Vinyl Tile 2.0% Chrysotile B24-B25 layer 2 Main Room Floor Mastic Trace Chrysotile B26-B27 layer 2 Men & Womens Bathroom Floor Mastic 2.0% Chrysotile Asbestos Information
The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 40 CFR 61, Subpart M, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (FED OSHA) classify asbestos-containing material (ACM) as any material or product that contains greater than 1% asbestos. Non-friable ACM is classified by NESHAP as either Category I or Category II material defined as follows:
 Category I – asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products.
 Category II – all remaining types of non-friable asbestos-containing material not included in Category I that when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM), a hazardous waste, is classified as any manufactured material that contains greater than 1% asbestos by dry weight and is:
 Friable (can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure); or  Category I material that has become friable; or
 Category I material that has been subjected to sanding grinding, cutting or abrading; or  Category II non-friable material that has a high probability of becoming crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to a powder during demolition or renovation activities.

A homogeneous area shall be determined to contain asbestos based on a finding that the results of at least one sample collected from that area shows that asbestos is present. “Asbestos-containing construction material” (ACCM) means any manufactured construction material which contains more than one tenth of 1 percent asbestos by weight.

Page 380 of 432 ends

More than 50 countries, including the United Kingdom, Australia and all 28 countries of the European Union have banned the use of asbestos. However the U.S. continues to import and use asbestos with no plan for stricter regulations in place. We now know for certain that all forms of asbestos can cause mesothelioma, lung cancer and other chronic respiratory conditions. Although it is highly regulated in the U.S. asbestos continues to be used in hundreds of consumer products as long as it accounts for less than one percent <1% of the product by dry weight.

Activities that disturb materials containing asbestos are subject to certain requirements of the Cal/OSHA asbestos standard contained in Title 8, CCR Section 1529. Typically, removal or disturbance of more than 100 square feet of material containing more than 0.1% asbestos must be performed by a DOSH registered asbestos abatement contractor. Materials containing more than 1% asbestos are also subject to NESHAP regulations (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M). RACM (friable ACM and non-friable ACM that will become friable during demolition operations) must be removed from structures prior to demolition.

Certain non-friable ACM and materials containing 1% or less asbestos may remain in structures during demolition; however, there are waste handling/disposal issues and Cal/OSHA work requirements that may make it cost ineffective to do so. Contractors are responsible for segregating and characterizing waste streams prior to disposal. With respect to potential worker exposure, notification, and registration requirements, Cal/OSHA defines asbestos-containing construction material as material that contains more than 0.1% asbestos (Title 8, CCR 341.6).

The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) classifies asbestos-containing material as a hazardous waste if it is “friable” and contains one percent (1.0%) or more asbestos as hazardous waste. A friable waste is one that can be reduced to a powder or dust under hand pressure when dry. This classification standard is given in California Code of Regulations, section 66261.24. Because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA) does not regulate asbestos as hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), it is considered to be a “non-RCRA, or “California-only” hazardous waste.

Joshua Leard, Nathanael Cowan
Certified Asbestos Consultants
Joshua CA DOSH #21-6967
Nathanael CA DOSH #24-7690
Office: 707-408-2080
Joshua Leard: 707-322-3183
Nathanael Cowan: 707-888-3584
[email protected]
¹ (PLM) Polarized Light Microscopy EPA Method 600/R-93-116 ² (NESHAP) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

Page 381 of 432 ends

Page 1 of 15 ends

Environmental Testing
Laboratories, Inc.
37575 W Huron River Drive
Romulus, Michigan 48174
(734) 955-6600
Fax: (734) 955-6604
To:

Attention:

Air Environmental
PO Box 294
Santa Rosa, California 95402
Project Location: 214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
Client Project: N/A
ETL Job: 277124
Josh Leard
Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed 1765336 B1 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765337 B2 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765338 B3 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765339 B4 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765340 B5 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765341 B6 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765342 B7 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765343 B8 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765344 B9 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765345 B10 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765346 B11 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765347 B12 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765348 B13 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765349 B14 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765350 B15 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765351 B16 Asbestos 03/10/2025
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 382 of 432 ends

Page 2 of 15 ends

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed 1765352 B17 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765353 B18 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765354 B19 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765355 B20 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765356 B21 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765357 B22 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765358 B23 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765359 B24 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765360 B25 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765361 B26 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765362 B27 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765363 B28 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765364 B29 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765365 B30 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765366 B31 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765367 B32 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765368 B33 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765369 B34 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765370 B35 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765371 B36 Asbestos 03/10/2025
1765372 B37 Asbestos 03/10/2025
Reviewed by:

Summary
Method Sample Layer Mastic
PLM 46 12
Point Count 2
Dawson Bradley
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 383 of 432 ends

Page 3 of 15 ends

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Page 384 of 432 ends

Page 4 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Client Project :
277124
N/A
Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.
37575 W Huron River Drive
Romulus, Michigan 48174
(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos 03/07/2025
03/10/2025
Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765336
B1
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM 3% Chrysotile
PC 3.5% Chrysotile
1765336
B1
PLM 97% Other
PC 92.5% Other
PC 4% Cellulose Texture Tan
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Wall Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765337
B2
Drywall Gray PLM 7% Cellulose PLM 93% Other
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765337
B2
Positive Stop
Main Room Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
PLM None Detected 1765338
B3
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765338
B3
Positive Stop
Main Room Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 385 of 432 ends

Page 5 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765339
B4
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765339
B4
Positive Stop
Main Room Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
PLM None Detected 1765340
B5
Drywall Gray PLM 6% Cellulose PLM 94% Other
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Ceiling Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765340
B5
Positive Stop
Main Room Ceiling
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
PLM None Detected 1765341
B6
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Ceiling Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765341
B6
Positive Stop
Main Room Ceiling
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 386 of 432 ends

Page 6 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765342
B7
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Ceiling Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765342
B7
Positive Stop
Main Room Ceiling
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
PLM None Detected 1765343
B8
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Bathroom Entry Ceiling
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM 2% Chrysotile
PC 1.5% Chrysotile
1765343
B8
PLM 98% Other
PC 96% Other
Texture Gray PC 2.5% Cellulose
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Bathroom Entry Ceiling
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765344
B9
Drywall Gray PLM 8% Cellulose PLM 92% Other
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765344
B9
Positive Stop
Men's Bathroom Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 387 of 432 ends

Page 7 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765345
B10
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Women's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765345
B10
Positive Stop
Women's Bathroom Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
PLM None Detected 1765346
B11
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Tool Room Wall
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765346
B11
Texture Gray PLM 2% Cellulose PLM 98% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Tool Room Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765347
B12
Drywall Gray PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Tool Room Wall
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765347
B12
Texture Gray PLM 1% Cellulose PLM 99% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Tool Room Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 388 of 432 ends

Page 8 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765348
B13
Drywall Gray PLM 8% Cellulose PLM 92% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Tool Room Wall
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765348
B13
Texture Cream PLM 3% Cellulose PLM 97% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Tool Room Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765349
B14
PLM 10% Cellulose PLM 90% Other Wall Paper Peach
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM Trace Chrysotile 1765349
B14
PLM 100% Other Glue Tan
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765350
B15
PLM 7% Cellulose PLM 93% Other Wall Paper Peach
Non-Fibrous
Women's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM Trace Chrysotile 1765350
B15
PLM 100% Other Glue Tan
Non-Fibrous
Women's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 389 of 432 ends

Page 9 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765351
B16
PLM 3% Cellulose PLM 97% Other Surface Coating Black
Non-Fibrous
Roof Non-Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
With Backing
PLM None Detected 1765352
B17
PLM 3% Cellulose PLM 97% Other Surface Coating Black
Non-Fibrous
Roof Non-Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
With Backing
PLM None Detected 1765353
B18
PLM 5% Cellulose PLM 95% Other Roof Tar Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Flat Roof
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765353
B18
Roof Tar Gray PLM 3% Cellulose PLM 97% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Flat Roof
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765353
B18
PLM 35% Fiberglass PLM 65% Other Paper Black
Fibrous
Homogenous Flat Roof
Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 390 of 432 ends

Page 10 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765354
B19
PLM 5% Cellulose PLM 95% Other Roof Tar Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Flat Roof
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765354
B19
Roof Tar Gray PLM 5% Cellulose PLM 95% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Flat Roof
Layer-2 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765354
B19
PLM 45% Fiberglass PLM 55% Other Paper Black
Fibrous
Homogenous Flat Roof
Layer-3 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765355
B20
Siding Paper Gray PLM 89% Cellulose PLM 11% Other
Fibrous
Homogenous Attic Wall
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765356
B21
Siding Paper Gray PLM 85% Cellulose PLM 15% Other
Fibrous
Homogenous Attic Wall
Layer-1 Analyst: OJ Ivey
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 391 of 432 ends

Page 11 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765357
B22
Carpet Multi PLM 100% Other fibrous
Fibrous
Main Room Floor Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765357
B22
PLM 100% Other Glue Beige
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Floor Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765358
B23
Carpet Multi PLM 100% Other fibrous
Fibrous
Main Room Floor Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765358
B23
PLM 100% Other Glue Beige
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Floor Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM 2% Chrysotile 1765359
B24
PLM 98% Other Vinyl Tile Brown
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Floor Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM Trace Chrysotile 1765359
B24
PLM 100% Other Mastic Black
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Floor Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 392 of 432 ends

Page 12 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :
1765360
B25
Positive Stop
Main Room Floor
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
PLM Trace Chrysotile 1765360
B25
PLM 100% Other Mastic Black
Non-Fibrous
Main Room Floor Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765361
B26
Sheet Vinyl Multi PLM Trace Cellulose PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Floor Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM 2% Chrysotile 1765361
B26
PLM 98% Other Mastic Black/Tan
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Floor Non-Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
With Brittle Material
PLM None Detected 1765362
B27
Sheet Vinyl Multi PLM Trace Cellulose PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Women's Bathroom Floor Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
1765362
B27
Positive Stop
Women's Bathroom Floor
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Layer Not Analyzed
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 393 of 432 ends

Page 13 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765363
B28
PLM 100% Other Vinyl Base Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Bathroom Entry Wall
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765363
B28
PLM 100% Other Mastic Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Bathroom Entry Wall
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM Trace Chrysotile 1765363
B28
Mud White PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Bathroom Entry Wall
Layer-3 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765364
B29
PLM 100% Other Vinyl Base Brown
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765364
B29
PLM 100% Other Mastic Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM Trace Chrysotile 1765364
B29
Mud White PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Men's Bathroom Wall Homogenous
Layer-3 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 394 of 432 ends

Page 14 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765365
B30
Concrete Slab Gray PLM Trace Cellulose PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Storage Room Floor
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765366
B31
Concrete Slab Gray PLM Trace Cellulose PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Storage Room Floor
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765367
B32
PLM 100% Other Brick Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Brick + Mortar
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765367
B32
Mortar Gray PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Brick + Mortar
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765368
B33
PLM 100% Other Brick Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Brick + Mortar
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765368
B33
Mortar Gray PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Brick + Mortar
Layer-2 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 395 of 432 ends

Page 15 of 15 ends

Certificate of Analysis
Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report
Location :

To :

Santa Rosa,California 95402
Air Environmental
PO Box 294
214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
ETL Job :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1765369
B34
Concrete Foundation Gray PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Concrete Foundation
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765370
B35
Concrete Foundation Gray PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Concrete Foundation
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765371
B36
Concrete Sidewalk Gray PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Concrete Sidewalk
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
PLM None Detected 1765372
B37
Concrete Sidewalk Gray PLM 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Homogenous Exterior Concrete Sidewalk
Layer-1 Analyst: Alexis Rausch
Date Analyzed : 03/10/2025
Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory
Alexis Rausch
OJ Ivey
Analyst:
400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC") Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples A % Asbestos result of "Trace" indicates that the analyzed material was found to contain less than 1% asbestos and would not be considered an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM).

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Page 396 of 432 ends

Page 397 of 432 ends

Page 398 of 432 ends

Page 399 of 432 ends

Page 400 of 432 ends

P.O. Box 294
Santa Rosa, Ca 95402
707-408-2080
[email protected]
Lead Inspection Report
From: Air Environmental
P.O. Box 294
Santa Rosa, Ca 95402
To: Attn: Amanda Archer
R&M Construction Services
Date: 3-7-25
Address: 214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
Date of testing: 3-7-25
Any Suspect Paint and Paint chips observed: No
Air Environmental was requested to perform a lead Inspection in the area(s) stated n the attached Chain of Custody and XRF Report.

Based on the Inspection and at the above described location on the date indicated, Air Environmental found no lead based paint. Lead levels were lower then 1mg/cm2 by EPA SW846 Method 6200. This is below the definition of lead based paint by the State of California Standards per Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1,Chapter 8, Article 1, Section 35033.

If you have any questions, please give us a call.

Joshua Leard - CDPH Inspector Assessor LRC-00004027
Nate Cowan - CDPH Inspector Assessor LRC-00013864
Pierce Tibbals - Lead Sampling Technician LRC-00008939
Ronin Crosier - Lead Sampling Technician LRC-00013344
Environmental Consultants
CA DOSH #21-6967

Page 401 of 432 ends

PO Box 294, Santa Rosa, Ca 95402 / 707-408-2080
Lead Analysis Report by XRF
Client: R&M Construction Services
214 E Perkins St
Test # Location Lead Analysis Results Substrate
Pb Levels
1 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall
2 Main Room Wall A Teal Paint <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall
3 0.01207 mg/cm² Pass Wood
4 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall
5 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall
Analyst: Ronin Crosier
Date of Report: 3-7-25 Ukiah, CA 95482
Analyzer Used: Vanta Element XRF
Location: 214 E Perkins St, Ukiah, CA 95482
Report ID: 5661
Vanta Element Unit: 849793 - <LOD = Less than Limit Of Detection Main Room Ceiling White
Paint
Main Room Wall A Window
Trim White Paint
Main Room Wall B White
Paint
Main Room Wall C White
Paint

Page 402 of 432 ends

6 0.01324 mg/cm² Pass Wood
7 0.0117 mg/cm² Pass Wood
8 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Wood
9 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall
10 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall
11 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall
12 Tool Room Wall D White Paint <LOD mg/cm² Pass Drywall 13 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Wood
14 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Wood
15 Exterior Wall C Tan Paint 0.0058 mg/cm² Pass Wood
16 <LOD mg/cm² Pass Concrete
17 Exterior Wall D Tan Paint <LOD mg/cm² Pass Stucco
Main Room Wall C Window
Trim Pink Paint
Main Room Wall D White
Paint
Main Room Wall D Door Trim
White Paint
Bathroom Entry Wall D White
Paint
Men's Bathroom Wall C Blue
Paint
Women's Bathroom Wall A
Pink Paint
Storage Room Wall B Door
Jamb Brown Paint
Exterior Wall C Door Trim
Brown Paint
Exterior Wall C Foundation
Tan Paint

Page 403 of 432 ends

Signature: Date:

Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:43:32
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 1
Elapsed Time : 3.37 s
Elapsed time: 3.4s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.002 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:43:51
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 2
Elapsed Time : 3.08 s
Elapsed time: 3.1s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.002 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:44:21
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 3
Elapsed Time : 3.76 s
Elapsed time: 3.8s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb 0.012 0.006 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:44:50
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 4
Elapsed Time : 3.16 s
Elapsed time: 3.2s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.002 Pass

Page 404 of 432 ends

Signature: Date:

Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:45:06
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 5
Elapsed Time : 3.69 s
Elapsed time: 3.7s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.003 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:46:04
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 6
Elapsed Time : 3.85 s
Elapsed time: 3.8s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb 0.013 0.006 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:46:44
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 7
Elapsed Time : 3.33 s
Elapsed time: 3.3s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb 0.012 0.006 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:47:01
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 8
Elapsed Time : 3.16 s
Elapsed time: 3.2s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.004 Pass

Page 405 of 432 ends

Signature: Date:

Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:47:26
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 9
Elapsed Time : 3.19 s
Elapsed time: 3.2s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.003 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:47:36
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 10
Elapsed Time : 3.49 s
Elapsed time: 3.5s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.003 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:47:47
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 11
Elapsed Time : 3.75 s
Elapsed time: 3.7s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.001 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:48:21
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 12
Elapsed Time : 3.15 s
Elapsed time: 3.1s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.002 Pass

Page 406 of 432 ends

Signature: Date:

Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:48:42
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 13
Elapsed Time : 4.07 s
Elapsed time: 4.1s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.004 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:49:05
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 14
Elapsed Time : 3.88 s
Elapsed time: 3.9s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.002 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:49:15
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 15
Elapsed Time : 3.27 s
Elapsed time: 3.3s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb 0.006 0.005 Pass
Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:49:36
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 16
Elapsed Time : 3.53 s
Elapsed time: 3.5s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.002 Pass

Page 407 of 432 ends

Signature: Date:

Chemistry
Serial Number : 849793
Time : 2025-03-07 15:49:54
Method : LeadPaint
Daily ID : 17
Elapsed Time : 3.7 s
Elapsed time: 3.7s
El mg/cm2 +/- 3σ
Pb ND <0.002 Pass

Page 408 of 432 ends

PROJECT REVIEW REFERRAL
Please provide comments by:

The City of Ukiah Community Development Department is soliciting input on the project described below for use in the staff analysis, CEQA document, and public hearing documents. Please identify any questions you have or missing information you need to complete your review, as well as suggested Conditions of Approval.

Please indicate whether you have comments and sign and date below. Return this Project Referral Form by the date noted above to the Project Planner listed.

Name and Affiliation/Department (please print) _____________________________________________________ ☐ No Comment
☐ Comments / Conditions of Approval Attached
Signature Date
TO:

City Planning Manager
City Building Official
City Public Works Dept.

Ukiah Valley Fire Authority
City CDD Director
Historical Society of Mendocino County
Mendocino County Assessor
City Electrical Utility
FROM PROJECT PLANNER:

PROJECT INFORMATION:

Project Name & Permit #:

Site Address & APN:

General Plan:

Zoning:

Airport Compatibility Zone:

Date Filed:

Resubmittal:

Date Referred:

Prev. Projects on Site (include file #)
Applicant/Agent Name:

Phone:

Email:

Project Summary:

Other:

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 409 of 432 ends

Page 410 of 432 ends

Page 411 of 432 ends

Page 412 of 432 ends

Page 413 of 432 ends

Comments / Conditions of Approval:

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 414 of 432 ends

Page 415 of 432 ends

Page 416 of 432 ends

Page 417 of 432 ends

https://www.newspapers.com/image/33320422/
Ukiah Daily Journal (Ukiah, California) · Thu, Jun 17, 1954 · Page 5 Downloaded on Feb 11, 2025
Copyright © 2025 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 418 of 432 ends

https://www.newspapers.com/image/1314615/
Ukiah Daily Journal (Ukiah, California) · Wed, Aug 26, 1959 · Page 27 Downloaded on Feb 11, 2025
Copyright © 2025 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.

Page 419 of 432 ends

§3016 MODIFICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
A. The section of the California building code, relating to applications for building permits is modified to require in an application to demolish a building, the date when the building was first constructed, if known. The terms "demolish" or "demolition", as used in this section, shall mean: 1) the tearing down of all or part of a building or 2) the cumulative alteration of a building pursuant to one or more building permits issued over a five (5) year period, where fifty percent (50%) or more of the structural or exterior components of the building are removed or replaced. The review required by this section shall occur with the application for the permit that: 1) results in the tearing down of all or part of the building or 2) authorizes the cumulative alteration of the building that equals or exceeds the specified percentage.

B. The section of the California building code, relating to the issuance of a building permit, is modified to require that, as to buildings constructed fifty (50) years or more prior to the date of application, the director of planning or his/her designee shall determine whether:

1. The building is an accessory building such as, but not limited to, a garage, storage shed, or carport, whether attached or detached to a main building; except that certain accessory buildings, such as carriage houses, which are presumed to have historic or architectural significance shall be subject to further review as provided in subsection D of this section, unless the building is subject to demolition under subsection B2 of this section.

2. Immediate demolition of the building is necessary to protect the public health or safety and the failure to immediately demolish the building would constitute a serious threat to the public health or safety.

C. If subsection B1 or B2 of this section applies to the building, no further review shall be required under this section and the permit shall be issued in accordance with the provisions of the California building code.

D. If the planning director finds that neither of the exceptions in subsection B1 or B2 of this section applies to the building, a building permit to demolish a building shall be subject to further review in accordance with this section. The planning director shall transmit the proposal to the demolition review committee, or other official reviewing body established by the city council, for review, comment, and a recommendation to the city council. Once the demolition review committee formulates a recommendation ATTACHMENT 4

Page 420 of 432 ends

concerning the disposition of the proposed permit, the planning director shall schedule and duly notice the matter for a public hearing and decision by the city council. The public noticing shall indicate the day, time, place, and purpose of the public hearing, and how additional information about the subject matter can be obtained. The public noticing shall be accomplished in the following manner:

1. Publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing.

2. Mailing or delivery at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the owner(s) of the subject property, or his/her agent, and to the project applicant, if the applicant is not the owner.

3. First class mail notice to all owners (as shown on the latest available Mendocino County tax assessor’s equalized assessment roll) of property within three hundred feet (300’) of the subject property.

E. In reviewing proposed permits, and formulating recommendations to the city council, the demolition review committee shall consider any information provided during the meeting, and shall use the following criteria. The structure:

1. Has a special or particular quality such as oldest, best example, largest, or last surviving example of its kind; or

2. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, or architectural history; or

3. Is strongly identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history.

F. If the demolition review committee finds that any of the criteria listed in subsection E of this section apply to the building proposed for demolition, it shall recommend denial of the permit to the city.

G. 1. The city council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to subsection D of this section to consider the recommendation of the demolition review committee, and to determine if any of the criteria listed in subsection E of this section apply to the building proposed for demolition. If the city council determines that any one of the criteria applies, it shall make a corresponding finding to that effect.

2. At the hearing, the applicant shall have the opportunity to present evidence that a viable market does not exist for the building, taking into account the condition of the building, the probable cost to put the building into marketable condition, and

Page 421 of 432 ends

the uses of the property allowed under existing or probable future zoning regulations. The city council shall consider such evidence offered by the applicant and any other information presented at the meeting by any interested party or by staff, to determine whether or not a viable market exists. "Viable market" means that it is reasonably likely that the building could be sold within a commercially reasonable period of time for more than the seller would be required to invest in the purchase of the property and preparing the property for sale, or that the property could produce a reasonable return on the amount of money it would take to purchase the property and prepare the building for income producing purposes. "Reasonable return" means the average rate of return on real estate investments in the Ukiah Valley.

3. If the city council determines that a viable market exists:
a. It shall so notify the building official who shall not issue the permit. The city council shall determine whether a viable market exists based on substantial evidence presented at the hearing, or, it may assume that a viable market exists, if the applicant fails to present substantial evidence that a viable market does not exist;
b. Not more than once within any twelve (12) month period, the applicant may submit a new application for a permit and the city council may reconsider whether a viable market exists:
(1) Upon a showing by the applicant that market conditions have changed; or
(2) Based upon new information that in the exercise of reasonable diligence the applicant could not have produced at the first hearing.

4. If the city council determines, based on substantial evidence, that a viable market does not exist, the issuance of the permit shall be stayed for a period of ninety (90) days.
a. During that ninety (90) day period, the city shall do the following:
(1) Determine whether other alternatives to demolition exist, which are acceptable to the applicant, that would preserve the historic, architectural or cultural significance of the building;
(2) Determine whether funds are available from any private source for the acquisition and preservation of the building through a negotiated purchase

Page 422 of 432 ends

on terms acceptable to the applicant; or
(3) If sufficient funds are available from any private source and a negotiated purchase is not possible, determine whether to acquire the building through eminent domain.
b. If within the ninety (90) days, the city does not reach agreement with the applicant or commence acquisition of the building, the building official may issue the permit in accordance with the provisions of the California building code.
c. If within the ninety (90) day period, the city either: 1) reaches agreement with the applicant or 2) commences acquisition of the building, the building official shall not issue the permit.
d. However, the building official shall continue to process the application for the permit in accordance with the California building code, if the city and the applicant terminate their agreement or the city fails to diligently pursue or abandons acquisition of the building.
e. The city manager or his/her designee shall inform the building official whenever the city and the applicant terminate their agreement or the city fails to diligently pursue or abandons acquisition of the building. f. If the building official has issued a demolition permit under this subsection and the permittee applies to extend the permit an additional one hundred eighty (180) days in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California building code then in effect, the building official shall refer the application to the city manager for an initial determination as to whether market conditions have changed. The city manager shall make the determination within ten (10) days after the application is referred by the building official. If the city manager determines that market conditions may have changed and that a viable market may exist for the property, he or she shall schedule the matter for a hearing before the city council to be noticed and conducted in accordance with subsection D of this section and this subsection G. However, at the hearing the city shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that market conditions have changed and a viable market exists. If the city manager determines that market conditions have not changed, he or she shall so notify the building official and the applicant. Upon such notification, the building official shall further process the application to extend the term of the permit in accordance with the requirements of the California building code then in effect.

If the city council conducts a hearing upon referral by the city manager, the city

Page 423 of 432 ends

clerk shall provide written notification to the building official and the applicant of the city council decision. If the city council decides that a viable market exists, the building official shall not issue the permit, but the provisions of subsection G3b of this section shall apply. If the city council decides that a viable market does not exist, the building official immediately shall proceed to further process the application in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California building code then in effect.

5. "Diligently pursue acquisition" means taking all steps within the time required by law to acquire the building by eminent domain.

6. References to "applicant" herein shall include the building owner.

H. The planning director shall provide a written notice of the city council determination to the applicant. The written notification shall be mailed or hand delivered within five (5) days from the date of the city council’s decision. The notice shall include the finding(s) and decision made by the city council and a copy of this section.

I. The applicant for a permit for a building determined to have historic, architectural or cultural significance shall salvage the building materials for reuse to the maximum extent feasible, and shall ensure that upon completion of the demolition, the site is left in a safe, presentable, and clutter free condition.

J. 1. Grounds For Reconsideration: The city council may reconsider a decision under this section within sixty (60) calendar days from the date the decision was made, if information that may have materially affected the decision was: a) misrepresented by the applicant, or b) not disclosed by the applicant, if the applicant knew or should have known that the information may have affected the city council decision. "Information" as used herein means matters of fact or law.

A decision may not be reconsidered, if all three (3) of the following have occurred:

The permit: a) has been issued, b) did not at the time it was issued violate any provision of the California building code, as adopted by the city, or any other city ordinance or state or federal law, and c) the permittee has commenced demolition in good faith reliance on the permit.

2. Procedure On Reconsideration: Reconsideration of a decision under this section may be placed on the agenda for a regular city council meeting by any member of the city council who voted in favor of the original decision. Notice of any meeting where reconsideration is on the agenda shall be provided in accordance with subsection D of this section. If already issued, the permit shall be suspended from the date that an eligible city council member requests that the matter be placed on

Page 424 of 432 ends

the agenda and until the city council makes a final decision upon reconsideration.

The building official shall notify the applicant in writing of the permit suspension. At the meeting, the city council shall determine, based on evidence provided to the city prior to or during the meeting, whether reconsideration is permitted under subsection J1 of this section. Any motion to reconsider the decision shall contain findings supported by substantial evidence. If upon reconsideration the city council makes a different decision, the city clerk shall provide notice of that decision to the building official and the applicant/permittee within five (5) working days after the decision is made. If, upon reconsideration, the city council determines that a building has historic, architectural, or cultural significance, and the building official has issued a permit based on the previous decision, the building official shall revoke the permit. If the previously issued permit has expired, the building official shall deny an application for a new permit, unless the permit is issued in accordance with subsection G4 of this section. (Ord. 838, §1, adopted 1984; Ord. 927, §1, adopted 1992; Ord. 1014, §1, adopted 1998; Ord. 1103, §1, adopted 2007)

Page 425 of 432 ends

CITY OF UKIAH

DEMOLITION PERMIT REVIEW COMMITTEE

SPECIAL MEETING

DRAFT MINUTES
MAY 22, 2025

1. 2.

3. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Craig Schlatter called the Demolition Permit Review Committee meeting to order at 11:01 a.m. in person and via Zoom teleconference.

ROLL CALL
Members Present: Chair Craig Schlatter, Director, Community Development Department; Member Tim Eriksen, City Engineer; Member Alyssa Ballard, Mendocino County Historical Society; Member Matthew Keizer, Chief Building Official, Community Development Department
Staff Present: Jesse Davis, Chief Planning Manager; Katherine Schaefers, Planning Manager Others present: None

APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Special Meeting Minutes – November 22, 2024
i. Motion/Second Eriksen/Keizer to approve the minutes of October 21, 2024, as submitted. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Member Eriksen, Keizer, Ballard and Chair Schlatter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: None.

4. COMMENTS FROM AUDIENCE ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
None.

5. APPEAL PROCESS
There is no formal appeal process for decisions made by the Demolition Review Committee, as all decisions are advisory to the City Council.

6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Request for Review and Recommendation to the City Council Regarding the Demolition of a Structure over the Age of 50 Years Located at 214 East Perkins Street (APNs 002-192-24 and 002-192-25).

Planning Manager Katherine Schaefers presented the Project.

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 426 of 432 ends

PUBLIC INPUT OPENED: 11:07 a.m.

Speakers: None
PUBLIC INPUT CLOSED: 11:08 a.m.

I. Motion/Second: Keizer/Eriksen to recommend to the City Council approval of the demolition permit to demolish the building located at 420 Cooper Lane (APN 003-582-24).

Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Member Eriksen, Keizer, Ballard and Chair Schlatter. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None.

7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None

8. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:10 a.m.

Page 427 of 432 ends

From: Barbra Chapman
To: PlanningDivision
Cc: Shannon Riley; Mellisa Hannum
Subject: Demolition of Curry"s building - staff concerns Date: Thursday, June 12, 2025 9:11:43 AM
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Katherine Schaefers,
Ukiah Library is next door to the old Curry's building, and library staff are very worried about the safety of residents, patrons, and staff due to the planned asbestos removal and the demolition of the Curry's building. We respectfully request that the asbestos removal be carefully monitored.

We also recommend that the demolition take place on a Monday when the Library is closed and there will be much less foot and car traffic on the street around the Curry's building. The next couple months the Library is having the Summer Reading Program with many events bringing in large numbers of families.

Please keep us up to date on plans and the date the demolition will happen.

Thank you,
Barb Chapman
Administrative Services Manager
Mendocino County Library
105 N. Main St. Ukiah, CA 95482
707-367-8216
[email protected]
The mission of the Mendocino County Library is to enrich lives through free and equitable access to materials and programs centered on education, culture, and entertainment.

Attachment 6

Page 428 of 432 ends

Page 1 of 1 ends

Agenda Item No: 14.b.

MEETING DATE/TIME: 6/18/2025

ITEM NO: 2025-702

AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
SUBJECT: Receive Updates on City Council Committee and Ad Hoc Assignments, and, if Necessary, Consider Modifications to Assignments and/or the Creation/Elimination of Ad Hoc(s).

DEPARTMENT: City Clerk PREPARED BY: Kristine Lawler, City Clerk PRESENTER: Mayor Crane and Various Councilmembers
ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2025 City Council Special Assignments and Ad Hocs
Summary: City Council members will provide reports and updates on their committee and ad hoc assignments. If necessary, the Council may consider modifications.

Background: City Council members are assigned to a number of committees and ad hoc activities. These assignments are included as Attachment 1.

Discussion: Previously, the City Council discussed having more time allocated to reporting on committee and ad hoc activities. Often, the Council Reports section of the regular agenda is rushed due to impending business (i.e., public hearings), and not enough time is afforded for reports beyond community activities.

In an effort to foster regular updates on committee and ad hoc assignments, this item is being placed on the agenda to provide the City Council members an expanded opportunity to report on assignments and modify assignments as necessary.

Recommended Action: Receive report(s). The Council will consider modifications to committee and ad hoc assignments along with the creation/elimination ad hoc(s).

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: N/A
CURRENT BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A
PROPOSED BUDGET AMOUNT: N/A
FINANCING SOURCE: N/A
REVENUE: No GRANT: No
PREVIOUS CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER NO.: N/A
COORDINATED WITH: N/A
STRATEGIC PLAN (SP): N/A
CLIMATE INITIATIVES (CI): N/A
GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS (GP): N/A

Page 429 of 432 ends

2025 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT LIST

LOCAL / UKIAH VALLEY MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT City Broadband Project TBD TBD
Civic Center300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482
to evaluate the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Internet Service Provider (ISP) for the California's Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Last Mile Broadband Orozco Jim Robbins, Grants Manager, 463-6708; [email protected] Investment Oversight Committee Varies
Civic Center300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482
Civic Center300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482
Reviews City investments, policies, and strategies
Crane
Orozco - AlternateAlan Carter, Treasurer
Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463-6220 [email protected] Disaster Council
Shall meet a minimum of once a year at a time and place designated upon call of the chair Place designated upon call of the chair or, if she/he is unavailable or unable to call such meeting, the first vice chair and then the City Manager or her/his designee.

Office of Emergency Management
300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482467-5720 - Traci Boyl
Develop any necessary emergency and mutual aid plans, agreements, ordinances, resolutions, rules, and regulations.

OrozcoCriss - Alternate
Traci Boyl, City Manager's Office Management Analyst; 467-5720; [email protected] Greater Ukiah Business & Tourism Alliance (GUPTA)
4th Monday of month, 10 a.m.
200 S School St.Ukiah, CA 95482
200 S School St.Ukiah, CA 95482
Promotes tourism and works to strengthen and promote the historic downtown and businesses within the greater Ukiah area Marianne Davison - Community Services Department Staff Orozco - Alternate Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager;
467-5793 [email protected]
Mendocino County Inland Water and Power Commission (IWPC) 2nd Thursday of month, 6:00 p.m.

Civic Center300 Seminary Avenueconference room 5
IWPC Staff P.O. Box 1247Ukiah, CA 95482391-7574 - Candace Horsley Develops coordination for water resources and current water rights: Potter Valley project - Eel River Diversion RodinOrozco - Alternate
Sean White, Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 [email protected] North Coast Opportunities (NCO) 4th Wednesday of month, 2 p.m. Alternating locations - Ukiah and Lakeport Governing Board ChairNorth Coast Opportunities413 North State StreetUkiah, CA 95482 Assist low income and disadvantaged people to become self reliant Neil Davis Neil Davis, Community Services Director; 467-5764
[email protected]
Sun House Guild ex officio 2nd Tuesday of month, 4:30 p.m. Sun House 431 S. Main St. Ukiah, CA 431 S. Main Street Ukiah, CA 95482 467-2836 Support and expand Grace Hudson Museum Orozco, Sher Neil Davis - Alternate David Burton, Museum Director; 467-2836 [email protected] Ukiah Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) 2nd Thursday of month, 1:30 p.m.

Board of Supervisors Chambers; 501 Low
Gap RoadUkiah, CA
County Executive Office501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1010Ukiah, CA 95482463-4441 GSA serves as the Groundwater Sustainability Agency in the Ukiah Valley basin CraneN/A - Alternate
Sean White, Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 [email protected]

MENDOCINO COUNTY MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT City Selection Committee Called as required by the Clerk of the Board BOS Conference Room 501 Low Gap Rd. Rm. 1090 Ukiah, CA C/O: BOS 501 Low Gap Rd., Rm 1090 Ukiah, CA 95482 463-4441 Makes appointments to LAFCO and Airport Land Use Commission (Mayor - Primary; Vice Mayor - Alternate) Mayor Crane Vice Mayor Sher Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217 [email protected] Economic Development & Financing Corporation (EDFC)
2nd Thursday of month, 2:00 p.m.

Primarily 631 S. Orchard Street (location varies)
Executive Director631 South Orchard AvenueUkiah, CA 95482467-5953 Multi-agency co-op for economic development and business loan program Riley (appointed 12/19/18) Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager; 467-5793 [email protected] Library Advisory Board
3rd Wednesdays of alternate months; 1:00
p.m.

Various Mendocino County Libraries Ukiah County Library 463-4491 Review library policy and activities Sher Rodin - Alternate Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217; [email protected] Mendocino County 1st District Liaison Monthly; TBD
Civic Center Annexconference room #5411 West Clay St.Ukiah, CA 95482 Civic Center300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482
To coordinate activities and policy development with the City's 1st District Supervisor Crane Rodin - Alternate
Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager;
463-6221; [email protected]
Mendocino County 2nd District Liaison 1st Wednesdays of month, 8:00 a.m.

Civic Center Annexconference room #5411 West Clay St.Ukiah, CA 95482 Civic Center300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482
To coordinate activities and policy development with the County's 2nd District Supervisor CrissRodin - Alternate
Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager;467-5793 [email protected] Mendocino Council of Governments (MCOG)
1st Monday of month, 1:30 p.m.

Board of Supervisors Chambers501 Low Gap RoadUkiah, CA
Executive Director367 N. State Street, Ste. 206 Ukiah, CA 95482463-1859 Plan and allocate State funding, transportation, infrastructure and project County wide Criss Sher - Alternate
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer;
463-6280 [email protected]
Mendocino County Airport Land Use Commission As needed
BOS Conference Room
501 Low Gap Rd., Rm. 1090,Ukiah, CA
Mendocino County Executive Office 501 Low Gap Rd. Rm. 1010 Ukiah, CA 95482 To formulate a land use compatibility plan, provide for the orderly growth of the airport and the surrounding area, and safeguard the general welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity Liaisons: Owen/Schlatter
Greg Owen, Airport Manager; 467-2855;
[email protected] Schlatter, Director of Community Development; 463-6219; [email protected] Mendocino County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) 1st Monday of month, 9:00 a.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers Executive Director
200 S. School Street, Ste. 2Ukiah, CA 95482463-4470
Required by legislation - planning spheres of influence, annexation, service areas, and special districts RodinCrane - Alternate for both city seat
members on Commission
Craig Schlatter, Director of Community Development; 463-6219; [email protected] Updated: 6/10/2025
Attachment 1

Page 430 of 432 ends

2025 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL ASSIGNMENT LIST

MENDOCINO COUNTY
Continued MTG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority (MSWMA)
3rd Thursday of every other month (varies), 10:00 a.m.

Willits Council Chambers
Solid Waste Director3200 Taylor DriveUkiah, CA 95482468-9710 County-wide Solid Waste JPA Crane Sher - Alternate Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 [email protected] Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA) Board of Directors
Last Wednesday of month, 1:30 p.m.

Alternating locations - Ukiah Conference Center or Fort Bragg, or Point Arena Executive Director241 Plant RoadUkiah, CA 95482462-1422 County-wide bus transportation issues and funding Sher Rodin - Alternate Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-6280 [email protected] Mendocino Youth Project JPA Board of Directors
3rd Wednesday of month, 7:45 a.m. 776 S. State Street Conference Room Mendocino Co. Youth Project776 S. State Street, Ste. 107Ukiah, CA 95482 707-463-4915 Targets all youth with a focus on drug and alcohol prevention, healthy alternatives and empowering youth to make healthy choices Criss Max Brazill, Admin Lieutenant - Alternate
Tom Corning, Police Chief; 463-6254;
[email protected]
Russian River Flood Control District
(RRFCD) Liaison
1st Monday of month, 5:30 p.m.
151 Laws Ave.,Suite D Ukiah, CA
151 Laws Ave., Ukiah, CA 95482; [email protected]; 462-5278 Proactively manage the water resources of the upper Russian River for the benefit of the people and environment of Mendocino County White/Orozco Sean White, Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 [email protected] Ukiah Players Theater Board of Directors
3rd Tuesday of month, 6:00 p.m
1041 Low Gap Rd Ukiah, CA 95482 462-1210
1041 Low Gap RdUkiah, CA 95482462-1210
To oversee the activities, organization and purpose of the Ukiah Players Theater
Greg Owen, Airport Manager(appointed 12/19/18)
Kristine Lawler, City Clerk; 463-6217 [email protected] Ukiah Unified School District (UUSD) Committee Quarterly 511 S. Orchard, Ste. D Ukiah, CA 95482 511 S. Orchard Ukiah, CA 95482 Information exchange with UUSD Board Chair, Mayor, Superintendent, and City Manager Orozco, Criss Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager Cedric Crook, Police Chief Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221 [email protected]

REGIONAL MTG DATE/TIME LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Great Redwood Trail Agency (GRTA) Bi-monthly, 3rd Thursdays, 10:30 a.m. Various Locations - announced 419 Talmage Road, Suite M Ukiah, CA 95482 463-3280 Provides a unified and revitalized rail infrastructure meeting the freight and passenger needs of the region Rodin Sher- Alternate Neil Davis, Community Services Director 467-5764 [email protected] League of California Cities Redwood Empire Legislative Committee Prior to Division Meetings, meets 3x in person and then via conference call Various locations that are announced
Redwood Empire League President; Public Affairs Program Manager (916) 658-8243 Elected city officials and professional city staff attend division meetings throughout the year to share what they are doing and advocate for their interests in Sacramento OrozcoCriss - Alternate
Sage Sangiacomo, City Manager; 463-6221
[email protected]
Russian River Watershed Association (RRWA)
4th Thursday of month, 9:00 a.m. (only 5 times a year)
Windsor Town Hall9291 Old Redwood Hwy, #400Windsor, CA 95492707-838-1000 Russian River Watershed Association 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 105Santa Rose, CA [email protected] 707-508-3670 (message only) Consider issues related to Russian river - plans projects and funding requests RodinSher - Alternate
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer;
463-6280 [email protected]
Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) - Commission
4th Thursday of month, 9:00 a.m. (see NCPA calendar)
Roseville, CA and other locations
651 Commerce Drive Roseville, CA 95678916-781-4202
Pool of State and local power utilities developing and operating power generation, providing scheduling and related energy services and providing regulatory and legislative support.

Crane - Commissioner Sher - City Council Alternate Sauers - Alternate and Commissioner in absence of Commissioner Crane
Cindi Sauers - Electric Utility Director;463-6286 [email protected] Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) – Lodi Energy Center (LEC) Appointment 2nd Monday of month, 10:00 AM Lodi, CA and other locations 651 Commerce DriveRoseville, CA 95678916-781-4299
Committee oversees the operation, maintenance and expenditures of the LEC 300 MW generating project.

Sauers – Project Participate Appointee
Cindy Sauers, Electric Utility Director,463‐6286, [email protected] Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC)
4th Wednesday of month, 10 a.m. 35 Iron Point Circle Suite 225 Folsom, CA 35 Iron Point Cir #225Folsom, CA 95630916-852-1673; [email protected] Provide electric transmission to its Member utilities through transmission line ownership or contract arrangements.

CraneSauers - Alternate
Cindi Sauers - Electric Utility Director;
463-6286 [email protected]

STANDING COMMITTEES MTG DATE/TIME LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS/CONTACT COMMITTEE FUNCTION ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT Diversity and Equity TBD Virtual Meeting Room (link to be created) Civic Center 300 Seminary Ave. Ukiah, CA 95482 Improve diversity and equity in the City’s workforce and municipal services Orozco/Criss Traci Boyl, City Manager's Office Management Analyst; 467-5720; [email protected] Fire Executive Committee
2nd Tue, every other month beginning in January; 5:00 p.m.

Ukiah Valley Conference Center,200 S. School Street Ukiah, CA Civic Center300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482 [email protected] Per the recently adopted agreement between the City of Ukiah and the Ukiah Valley Fire Protection District Orozco/SherAlternates: Criss
Doug Hutchison, Fire Chief; 463-6263; [email protected] Countywide Oversight Board to the RDA Successor Agencies 4th Thursday of January, 4:00 p.m.; meets annually
Ukiah Valley Conference Center,200 S. School Street Ukiah, CA City of UkiahATTN: City Clerk300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482 Oversee and direct the Successor Agencies of the former redevelopment agencies Crane Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance; 463‐6220 [email protected] Lawler, City Clerk; 463‐6217, [email protected] Water Executive Committee(Ukiah Valley Water Authority) 1st Tue of each month
at 6:00 p.m.

Ukiah Valley Conference Center,200 S. School Street Ukiah, CA City of UkiahATTN: Sean White300 Seminary Ave.Ukiah, CA 95482 Oversight of UVWA; set annual budget for the combined water system; Manage rates and collect levies; modify existing water rights for the provision of water service; mediation and dispute resolution; Crane/Orozco Sean White, Director of Water Resources; 463-5712 [email protected] Updated: 6/10/2025

Page 431 of 432 ends

COMMITTEE ASSIGNED TO PRINCIPAL STAFF SUPPORT
Electric Grid Operational Improvements Crane/Orozco Cindy Sauers, Electric Utility Director; 463-6286 [email protected]
Trench Cut Policy Development Crane Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463- 6280 [email protected]
Advance Planning & Policy for Annexation
Applications Crane/Rodin
Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
463-6219 [email protected]
UVSD/ City Relations
Ad hoc committee to address specific issues with the Ukiah Valley Sanitation District, including discussion of overall sewer system service delivery policies, operating policy revisions, potential revisions to the current Operating Agreement, and cost sharing
Crane/Orozco
Dan Buffalo, Director of Finance;
463‐6220 [email protected]
Sean White, Water Resources Director
463‐5712 [email protected]
Orr Street Bridge Corridor Rodin/Sher Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463- 6280 [email protected]
Complete Streets Rodin/Crane
Tim Eriksen, Public Works Director/City Engineer; 463-
6280 [email protected]
Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager
467-5793 [email protected]
Neil Davis, Community Services Director
467-5764 [email protected]
Special Districts (Water District Consolidation) Orozco/Crane Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467‐5793 [email protected]
Corp Yard Planning Crane/Orozco Jason Benson, Senior Civil Engineer 463‐6284 [email protected]
Mendocino County Courthouse Project and Reuse Sher/Orozco Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467‐5793 [email protected]
City's 150-Year Anniversary Planning Orozco/Rodin Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467‐5793 [email protected]
Zoning Reform
Function is to explore creation of a new ministerial zoning permit and identify additional zoning streamlining and reform efforts to provide better and more consistent development outcomes
Crane/Orozco
Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
463-6219 [email protected]
Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA)
Steering Committee
assist in the creation of the 2025 CHNA Report for the
communities served by the three Adventist Health hospitals in Mendocino County. providing insight, identifying, gathering and analyzing the health needs of our community. Additionally Rodin/Sher
Jeremy Malin, NP
Director of Community Health Analytics
Adventist Health Howard Memorial
Adventist Health Ukiah Valley
Adventist Health Mendocino Coast
978-289-3330; [email protected]
Parks & Recreation Special District Exploration Rodin/Orozco Neil Davis, Community Services Director 467-5764 [email protected]
Downtown Zoning code Crane/Rodin
Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director
463-6219 [email protected]
Tourism Advisory Committee Rodin/Sher Shannon Riley, Deputy City Manager 467‐5793 [email protected]
Historic Preservation Code Sher/Criss Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director 463-6219 [email protected]
Fire Severity Rodin/Orozco Craig Schlatter, Community Development Director 463-6219 [email protected]
City Council Handbook Review and Update Sher Kristine Lawler, City Clerk 463‐6217; [email protected]

2025 AD HOC COMMITTEES
*Note: Changing the composition of an existing ad‐hoc among current councilmembers after work has begun presents potential Brown Act issues. Requests for fully filled ad‐hocs are represented on the draft, but staff does not recommend changes except to fill vacated assignments. The current requests on the sheet for fully composed ad‐hocs are primarily intended to convey interest in topics covered by these ad‐hoc committees for possible future consideration of new assignments.

Updated: 6/10/2025

Page 432 of 432 ends

Ukiah City CouncilJune 18, 2025

Ukiah City Council
June 18, 2025