Agenda packet, regular meeting — Union City City Council, January 11, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

1.1.7 City Meetings: Consultant will present at two (2) quarterly, City publicly noticed design update meeting for the benefit of the public, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit advocates.

These meetings may be combined with BPAC meetings. The purpose of this meeting is to present updates to the public during the entire design phase and to receive feedback and answer questions from the public about the design elements.

1.1.8 Invoices and Progress Reports: Consultant will prepare and submit budgets, monthly progress and performance reports and invoices.

1.1.9 Correspondence: Consultant will prepare and submit correspondence and memos, including all meeting minutes.

1.1.10 Quality Control / Quality Assurance: Consultant will establish and implement a quality control and quality assurance procedures for design activities, perform in-house quality control reviews for each report and other task deliverables. Quality Control documentation can be submitted to the City upon request.

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings: Consultant will conduct bi-monthly Project Development Team (PDT) design coordination meetings. The location for the meetings will be a location to be determined by City of Union City and meetings shall include a video capable conference link for remote attendance. Consultant will prepare and submit an agenda, status of submittals register, data request log of information requested from and provided to others and meeting minutes after each meeting. The agenda outline shall cover cost, schedule and scope issues. The submittal register and data request log shall be presented and reviewed at each meeting to highlight due dates and prevent schedule slippage. In the event of change in the milestone dates, Consultant shall amend the Agreement schedule and include the new milestone dates with the next amendment being issued. The submittal register shall highlight all outstanding issues and responses to action items.

Deliverables:
1) Meeting agendas and minutes (up to 8 meetings)
2) Project Schedule Updates (monthly)
3) QA/QC Plan
4) Submittal Register
5) Presentation Materials for Project Coordination Meetings 6) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise TASK 2. DATA GATHERING AND REVIEW
The CONSULTANT shall obtain, and review readily available data and information related to the design the project. This information may be obtained from the City, CALTRANS, Alameda CTC, utilities, and other agencies and organizations.

Data to be gathered and review include, but is not limited to the following:
 Environmental Document
City Council/RSA Agenda 235 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Scope of Services
City of Union City
Quarry Lakes Parkway

Page 4 of 9 ends

 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
 EWC Design Plans
 As-built plans
 Utility information
 Aerial photos and any available mapping, including digital topography  Survey control data
 Right of Way information
 Permit requirements, specifically for Phases 1 and 2 of QLP  Pertinent historical correspondence
 Assumes no new field investigations are included in the environmental scope of work.

Deliverables:
1) List of additional information gathered
2) List of additional information required for final design 3) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise TASK 3. PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS
PDR Process is to document decisions made to allow development of the final basis of design for the project. PDR issues may include, but are not limited to design deviations, alternatives, innovations, project compliance with NACTO standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including but not limited to on-street and separated bicycle facilities, sidewalks and intersections, best and highest quality use for transit, storm/drainage, utilities, right of way/easements, construction methods, cost impacts, project implementation/phasing, public/political nature and issues, various design elements for value engineering opportunities, environmental compliance and permit requirements for the Project.

As Consultant and other involved parties identify project issues, the Consultant shall prepare draft PDR in the following format:
1) Introduction of Issues
2) Presentation of design deviations, impact to policies, options, alternatives, cost impacts, etc. (design criteria, issues, calculation, costs, etc.)
3) Benefit analysis
4) Cost, scope and schedule reconciliation
5) Consultant’s recommendation
A draft of the PDR shall be submitted to City one week in advance of the scheduled design coordination meeting. This PDR shall be presented to City at the regular design coordination meeting. Upon conclusion, City will request that Item 6 be added to the report, which will be the “City’s Decision”.

The first PDR issue shall be labeled as PDR No. 1, and moving forward, sequentially number the report as 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. as follows:
1) PDR No. 1 – Hydrology
2) PDR No. 2 – Hydromofication
City Council/RSA Agenda 236 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Scope of Services
City of Union City
Quarry Lakes Parkway

Page 5 of 9 ends

3) PDR No. 3 – Water Quality
4) PDR No. 4 – Drainage
5) PDR No. 5 and etc. shall be as identified.

Under each PDR issues, i.e. PDR No. 1 – Hydrology, subtasks shall be sequentially number as 1.1 “100 Year Storm Hydrology”, 1.2 “Line M Realignment”, 1.3 “Bypass Facility”, 1.4 “Construction Phasing of the Bypass Facility”, etc.

It is anticipated that there will be up to 15 PDR issues.

Deliverables:
1) Draft PDR Issue (No. 1-15)
2) Final PDR Issue (No. 1-15)
3) Final combined PDR (includes all PDR Issues)
4) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise TASK 4. ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1 Following engineering reports shall be prepared for Phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 of QLP:

4.1.1 Landscape Concept Report
Based on outcome of the PDR Process, prepare landscape concept report. • Written description of goals and objectives
• Plan shall include bio filtration treatment type and locations. • Final illustrated schematic plan at 1”=100’ scale, image boards, and other drawings that clearly show the design intent.

4.1.2 Hydrology Report
Appendix I, “Hydrology-Hydraulic Report” was prepared as part of the EWC Environmental Document. This report, along with the final decisions made as part of the PDR Process, should be utilized to update the hydrology report for QLP.

4.1.3 Hydromodification Report
95% Draft Stormwater Management Plan, dated June 2011, was prepared for the EWC Connector Project. This report, along with the final decisions made as part of the PDR Process (i.e., example – QLP is now discharging only to the Old Alameda Creek, investigate if hydromodification can be downsized, along with consideration for on-site alternative treatment), should be utilized to update the hydromodification report.

4.1.4 Water Quality Report
Similarly, 95% Draft Stormwater Management Plan, dated June 2011, was prepared for the EWC Connector Project. This report, along with the final decisions made as part of the PDR Process (i.e., example – When Union City undertook the development of PSSC and PG&E, which included KB Homes, the mechanical water quality treatment devices were City Council/RSA Agenda 237 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Scope of Services
City of Union City
Quarry Lakes Parkway

Page 6 of 9 ends

considered adequate, on-site and offsite mitigations, etc.), should be utilized to update the water quality report.

4.1.5 Drainage Report
95% Draft Drainage Report, dated June 2011, was prepared for the EWC Connector Project. This report, along with the final decisions made as part of the PDR Process, should be utilized to update the hydromodification report. Drainage Report shall include construction implementation for the four phases of QLP.

4.1.6 Utility Company Requirement Report (water, sewer, electrical, gas, & communication) Prepare utility requirement report based on development needs and coordinating the requirement with Alameda County Water District (ACWD), Union Sanitary District (USD), PG&E, AT&T, Comcast and other communication providers to determine their needs for wet and dry utility systems. If a cooperation with utility providers cannot be achieved in a timely manner, Consultant shall develop conceptual layout and sizing needs for all dry and wet utility system to support the proposed future developments. The report shall include a plan with utilities superimposed on the storm system.

4.1.7 Permit Requirement Report
EWC identified number of permits required, but not limited to USACE 404 Wetland, CF&G 1602 Streambed Alteration, RWQCB 404 Water Quality, USF&WS section 7 Endangered Species, NMFS Section 7 Endangered Species and SHPO section 106 Historic Preservation. Permit Requirement Report shall be prepared for each of the four phases and when these permits will need to be obtained. Permitting requirements identification will build on the prior permitting strategy developed for East-West Connector.

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception Report
Consultant shall document all design deviations and exceptions. Each deviation/exception shall be sequentially numbered and each report shall list design deviation/exception and reasons.

4.2 Following engineering reports shall be prepared for Phases 1 and 2 of QLP:

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials Report
Appendix L, “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment” was prepared as part of the EWC Environmental Document along with Niles Clay Cap, PG&E and PSSC environmental cleanup completed by City of Union City. This report, along with the final decisions made as part of the PDR Process, should be utilized to update the hazardous material report for QLP.

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnical Report
Based on work completed as part of the EWC, update materials/geotechnical report with additional field investigation as required, and recommendations for new pavement sections and off-site parking/pavement section, widening of existing pavement sections, traffic signal pole foundations, slope stability, Line M channel reconstruction, and soil corrosion analysis.

City Council/RSA Agenda 238 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Scope of Services
City of Union City
Quarry Lakes Parkway

Page 7 of 9 ends

4.2.3 Lighting Concept Report
Lighting Concept Report shall include type of lighting fixtures, locations, and lighting illumination distribution plan to support all modes of transportations (pedestrians, bikes, transit and vehicles)

4.2.4 Other Reports as determined during PDR process can be completed as a supplemental service.

Deliverables for all reports:
1) Draft Engineering Reports
2) Final Engineering Reports
3) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise TASK 5. RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING

5.1 Review existing topographic survey completed as part of the EWC project and determine additional field survey required for the project. With an approval from City, perform all additional topographic survey required for Phase 1 and 2 of QLP. It is assumed additional topographic surveys are limited to five (5) days of field time and the City will provide all access and necessary permits at no cost to Mark Thomas.

5.2 Review previously completed survey task as part of EWC Project, which included but not limited to survey data control, hardcopy mapping, right of way requirement, and right of way appraisal mapping. City of Union City retained a consultant (Towill, Inc.) to perform right of way engineering services for QLP dated 2/3/2020. As part of this scope, a draft right of way requirement mapping and parcel map was completed for Phases 1, 2, 3 and 4 of QLP. Consultant shall review these survey data to confirm that the previously completed right-of-way engineering services and parcel map are based upon field ties to monuments, evaluation of evidence and proper resolution of all parcels, easements and rights-of-way necessary for the final parcel map. As part of the PDR Issue, Consultant shall document its’ finding and any necessary tasks required to complete the parcel map for recordation. A draft parcel map shall be prepared.

Deliverables:
1) Documentation of existing data
2) Additional topographic survey
3) Parcel Map (up to 4 sheets)
4) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise TASK 6. 35% LEVEL OF ENGINEERING COMPLETION

6.1 35% Level Plans
Consultant will prepare 35% level plans Phases 1 and 2 of the Project as follows:

Plan Sheet
City Council/RSA Agenda 239 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Scope of Services
City of Union City
Quarry Lakes Parkway

Page 8 of 9 ends

T Sheet Title Sheet
TC Sheet Typical Cross Sections
SI Sheet Surface Improvement and Profile at 1” =40’ scale U Sheet Underground Improvement at 1” =40’ scale, which shall include storm, biotreatment, wet/dry utilities C Sheet Construction Details (Line M Reconstruction and Basins only for 35%) PD Sheet Pavement Delineation
ES Sheet Electrical - Signals
EL Sheet Electrical - Lighting
L Sheet Landscape Plan
In addition to above, SI, U and PD series shall be prepared for Phase 3 and 4 of QLP.

Consultant shall submit 35% level drawings to City, Alameda CTC, ACFC&WCD, utility companies, Gateway Developer and to be prepared to present the project findings from the PDR process to City Council.

Deliverables:
1) 35% Plans (in AutoCAD, .pdf and up to 3 full size hardcopies) 2) Submittal letters to stakeholders agencies and utility companies

6.2 Engineer’s Estimate
Consultant will prepare a 35% level engineering estimate broken down by bid items as appropriate.

Deliverables:
1) 35% Estimate (in Excel, .pdf and up to 3 full size hardcopies)

6.3 Environmental Re-validation/Re-evaluation
Based on 35% level engineering set of plans, Consultant will prepare an environmental assessment review similar to June 15, 2020 memo prepared by ICF for Quarry Lake Parkway to complete the required environment compliance. If necessary, in order to complete the Environmental Compliance, a CEQA Addendum would be prepared to address changes in design since the 2009 EIR. It is presumed that the revised design will be generally consistent with the project design and footprint in the 2009 EIR and will not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts and thus will not trigger the need for a subsequent or supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration or EIR. No NEPA documentation is included in the scope. No new quantitative analyses are included in the environmental scope of work.

Deliverables:
1) Draft Environmental Re-Val Report
2) Final Environmental Re-Val Report
3) Environmental Evaluation Summary
4) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise City Council/RSA Agenda 240 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Scope of Services
City of Union City
Quarry Lakes Parkway

Page 9 of 9 ends

6.4 Environmental Monitoring
Consultant will prepare an updated environmental monitoring plan for Phase 1 and 2 of the QLP Project. For Environmental Monitoring, it is presumed that the prior East-West Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be the basis of the new environmental monitoring plan.

Deliverables:
1) Draft Environmental Monitoring Report
2) Final Environmental Monitoring Report
3) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise

6.5 Scope of Services, Fee Proposal and Schedule for Final Design Completion Consultant will develop the scope, fee and schedule for the completion of the remainder of the Final PS&E for Phase 1 and 2 of the QLP Project.

Deliverables:
1) Draft Scope of Services, Fee Proposal and Final PS&E Schedule 2) Final Scope of Services, Fee Proposal and Final PS&E Schedule 3) All deliverables will be in .pdf format unless specified otherwise TASK 7. DEVELOPER COORDINATION

7.1 Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) Support Services Consultant will perform ENA support services and coordinate with the Gateway Site developer on an on-going and as-needed basis. Tasks may include reviewing conceptual development proposal plans and providing design inputs for consistence and in conformance with the goals of Quarry Lakes Parkway, general coordination and correspondence with the developer’s consultant team and meeting attendance including preparing exhibits. As the specific deliverables required for this task are unknown at this time, this task will be billed on a time and materials basis up to the budgeted amount. If additional support is needed over and above the provided budget, an amendment will be required to continue support services.

Deliverables:
1) TBD (as-needed and requested by the City)
2) All deliverables will be in CAD files, word document and/or .pdf format unless specified otherwise
City Council/RSA Agenda 241 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

EXHIBIT A
A-2 SCHEDULE
City Council/RSA Agenda 242 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
EXHIBIT A-2

SCHEDULE

1. Notice to Proceed January 14, 2022

2. Kick-off Meeting January 18, 2022

3. Identify initial PDR issue topics for discussion January 21, 2022

4. First PDR Meeting January 25, 2022

5. Complete review of data January 28, 2022

6. Engineering reports
a. Complete draft landscape concept report February 15, 2022 b. Complete draft utility envelope plan February 28, 2022 c. Complete draft Haz Mat Report March 15, 2022
d. Complete draft Materials/Geotech Report May 1, 2022

7. Complete PDR Process
a. Hydrology March 10, 2022
b. Hydromodification March 10, 2022
c. Drainage April 5, 2022
d. All others April 15, 2022

8. Complete draft roadway layout April 28, 2022

9. Remaining engineering reports
a. Permit Requirement Report April 20, 2022
b. Utility Requirement Report April 20, 2022
c. Hydrology/Hydromodification Reports April 27, 2022
d. Drainage Report May 5, 2022

10. Finalize roadway layout May 16, 2022

11. Draft updated Parcel Map May 30, 2022

12. Draft 35% Plans June 3, 2022

13. Draft final design scope and budget June 4, 2022

14. Final 35% Plans June 20, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 243 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
B-1 TOTAL COST BREAKDOWN BY TASKS

INCLUDING REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
City Council/RSA Agenda 244 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B5: Budget by Task
Task No. Task Description Task Budget
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $163,272.65

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design $7,931.26

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants $5,578.12

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance $1,518.63

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files $4,370.93

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule $4,511.56

1.1.6 Meetings $39,598.06

1.1.7 City Meetings $21,636.99

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports $14,668.86

1.1.9 Correspondence $5,413.12

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance $19,764.38

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings $38,280.73
2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW $28,111.56

2.1 Data Gathering & Review $28,111.56
3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS $62,040.46

3.1 PDR Process $62,040.46
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS $362,228.56

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases $0.00

4.1.1 Landscape Concept $43,251.50

4.1.2 Hydrology $15,955.17

4.1.3 Hydromodification $20,777.01

4.1.4 Water Quality $13,790.93

4.1.5 Drainage $20,722.27

4.1.6 Utility Requirement $16,663.92

4.1.7 Permit Requirement $12,659.70

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception $52,709.82

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2 $0.00

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials $35,296.15

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals $112,168.13

4.2.3 Lighting $18,233.96
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING $53,528.15

5.1 Topographic Survey $22,441.97

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map $31,086.18
6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION $330,678.21

6.1 35% Level Plans $250,880.62

6.2 Engineers Estimate $25,799.71

6.3 Environmental Clearance $32,637.82

6.4 Environmental Monitoring $7,996.06

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule $13,364.02
7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION $199,558.14

7.1 ENA Support Services $199,558.14
TOTAL $1,200,000.00
City Council/RSA Agenda 245 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B6: Budget by Firm
Vendor Tier Certification
(LBE, SLBE, VSLBE and/or DBE) Budget
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.* Prime LBE $418,016.49
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. Tier 1 LBE $80,681.20
Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. Tier 1 LBE, SLBE $7,741.34 Bonnie Fisher Tier 2 under ROMA None $17,500.00
Boris Dramov Tier 2 under ROMA None $42,000.00
Cal Safety† Tier 2 under PARIKH Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, VSLBE, CAL20201228-03 exp. 2022-12-31 $112.00
CSW|ST2 Tier 1 LBE, SLBE $56,566.67
Driller† (TBD) Tier 2 under PARIKH None $4,060.00
Fugro USA Land, Inc. Tier 1 LBE $32,009.40
GeoEx (Dixon) or EGS (San Jose) Tier 2 under PARIKH None $280.00 Guida Surveying, Inc.† Tier 1 LBE, SLBE $21,603.67
HDR Engineering, Inc. Tier 1 LBE $115,732.75
ICF Tier 1 None $93,959.17
Kittelson & Assoc, Inc. Tier 1 LBE $12,148.40
PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tier 1 LBE, SLBE, DBE $106,182.70 PGAdesign Tier 1 LBE, SLBE, VSLBE $81,806.14
ROMA Collaborative Tier 1 None $19,923.72
Sunland (Sacramento) Tier 2 under PARIKH None $400.00
TDG Engineering LLC, subsidiary of
Toole Design Group, LLC Tier 1 LBE $33,693.13
Y&C Transportation Consultants, Inc. Tier 1 LBE, SLBE, VSLBE, DBE $55,000.96 TOTAL: $1,200,000.00
DBE Total (excluding on-call or optional budget): 13.44% LBE Total (excluding on-call or optional budget): 85.15% SLBE Total (excluding on-call or optional budget): 27.43% An asterisk (*) by the name of the vendor listed above denotes vendors handling Personally Identifiable Information.

An obelisk (†) by the name of the vendor listed above denotes vendors performing prevailing wage work or that have a subcontracted vendor performing prevailing wage work.

NON-CONTINGENCY TASKS/DELIVERABLES

CONTINGENCY TASKS/DELIVERABLES
City Council/RSA Agenda 246 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

PROCURING AGENCY TO COMPLETE THIS BOX
Name of Reviewer:
/S/ [Type Name of Reviewer here]
Form B8: Unit Costs by Firm
Task No.

Name of
Firm, Contractor or Vendor
(List Order: Prime then Subs alphabetically, regardless of tier)
Vendor Tier Description of Work, Service, or Materials Supplied Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total

THIS FORM IS REQUIRED IF DIRECT EXPENSES/OTHER DIRECT
COSTS ARE INCLUDED. All direct expenses and unit costs from Form B1:

Breakdown of Costs must be broken out in detail in this Form B8.

Include quote detail or enough detail for reviewer to understand how the estimate was determined; see examples.

Sample Task for Instructional Purposes Only:
#.# Acme Prime, Inc. (in-house) Prime Fact Sheets: 400 2-sided color handouts @ $1.40 per handout 400 handout $1.40 $ 560.00
#.# 123 Printing Press Co. Tier 2 under Brand, LLC Exhibit Boards: 3 exhibit boards @ $140 each 3 boards $140.00 $ 420.00 #.# Movement Counts, Inc. Tier 1
Vehicle occupancy counts: 513 monitored ln-hrs (4
locations x 2 days x 9.5 to 10 pk hrs/day x 4 to 6
lns/location) @ quoted $91.45 per monitored hour 513 hour $91.45 $ 46,913.85 #.# TBD TBD
72-hour continuous midweek
video average daily traffic (ADT) counts: 4 midweek
locations (2 EB/2WB) @ estimated $1,238 per location 4 location $1,238.00 $ 4,952.00 #.# Brand, LLC Tier 1
Mileage: 382 miles roundtrip from Roseburg to Bend @

50.5 cents per mile 382 miles $0.51 $ 192.91
1 $ -

7.1 Bonnie Fisher Tier 2 under ROMA Urban Design Consultant 50.0 hours $350.00 $ 17,500.00

7.1 Boris Dramov Tier 2 under ROMA Urban Design Consultant 120.0 hours $350.00 $ 42,000.00

4.2.2 Cal Safety† Tier 2 under PARIKH Traffic Control 1 PER SHIFT $2,200.00 $ 2,200.00

4.2.2 Driller Tier 2 under PARIKH Drill hole grouting 210 PER FOOT $10.00 $ 2,100.00

4.2.2 Driller Tier 2 under PARIKH Disposal of drill cuttings 12 PER 55-Gal Drum $375.00 $ 4,500.00

4.2.2 Driller† Tier 2 under PARIKH Driller mob-demob 4 PER HOUR $450.00 $ 1,800.00

4.2.2 GeoEx (Dixon) or EGS (San Jose) † Tier 2 under PARIKH Drilling rig - Field exploration 4 PER SHIFT $4,750.00 $ 19,000.00

5.1 Guida Surveying, Inc. Tier 1 Mileage 89.3 miles $0.56 $ 50.00

1.1.8 HDR Engineering, Inc. Tier 1 Mileage 892.9 miles $0.56 $ 500.00

1.1.8 ICF Tier 1 Mileage: 100 miles roundtrip to Union City @$0.56/mile X 500 miles $0.56 $ 280.00

1.1.9 ICF Tier 1 Mileage: 100 miles roundtrip to Union City @$0.56/mile X 500 miles $0.56 $ 280.00

2.1 ICF Tier 1 Cultural Resource Records Search 1 Search $3,500.00 $ 3,500.00

6.3 ICF Tier 1 Mileage: 100 miles roundtrip to Union City @$0.56/mile X 1000 miles $0.56 $ 560.00

4.2.2 PARIKH Tier 1 Encroachment & Acwd Permits (Waived) 2000 permit fees $0.00 $ -

4.2.2 PARIKH Reproduction (outside services, use local available) 4 Unit $100.00 $ 400.00

4.1.1 PGAdesign Tier 1 Mileage: 50 mile round trip for each visit, four trips expected 200.0 miles $0.56 $ 112.00

4.1.1 PGAdesign Tier 1 Printing for exhibits 6.0 each $50.00 $ 300.00

4.2.2 Sunland (Sacramento) Tier 2 under PARIKH Corrosion lab tests 4 per set of tests $200.00 $ 800.00

1.1.9 TDG Engineering Tier 1 Travel to / from meetings / site 892.9 miles $0.56 $ 500.00 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Tier 1 Auto Mileage for traveling between Y&C's Fremont Office 166.96 miles $0.56 $ 93.50 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Tier 1 Parking (at cost) 1 each $20.00 $ 20.00 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Tier 1 Express Mails/Deliveries (at cost) 1 each $40.00 $ 40.00 Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Tier 1 Outside Copying (at cost) 1 each $91.50 $ 91.50 $ 96,627.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
TOTAL: $ 96,627.00
An obelisk (†) by the name of the vendors listed above denotes line items subject to prevailing wage requirements.

NON-CONTINGENCY TASKS/DELIVERABLES
TOTAL Non-Contingency

CONTINGENCY TASKS/DELIVERABLES
TOTAL Contingency
City Council/RSA Agenda 247 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
100.00% 58.01% 100.00% 130.70%

0.00% 93.92% 0.00% 0.00%

0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10.00%

0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00%

1.0000 1.0000
Names and Classification
Sasha Dansky, Principal-in-Charge
Shawn O'Keefe, Principal-in-Charge/
Project Manager
Danielle Sanchez, Deputy Project
Manager
Sr. Project Engineer (Various)
Project Engineer (Various)
Design Engineer II (Various)
Design Engineer I (Various)
Deputy District Manager (Various)
CM Division Manager (Various)
Operations Manager (Various)
LAUD Division Manager (Various)
Sr. Engineering Manager (Various)
Survey Division Manager (Various)
Sr. Project Surveyor (Various)
Sr. Sruveyor (Various)
Lead Survey Technician (Various)
Sr. Project Coordinator (Various)
Sr. Project Assistant (Various)
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit Mercurio / Design Manager
Barnard / Sr Structures Eng
Track Eng
Structures Eng
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit Direct Salary Rate (Average, Actual, Max) for Current Year $145.00 $135.00 $68.50 $57.50 $52.50 $41.00 $37.50 $93.60 $96.76 $72.46 $78.63 $131.21 $110.00 $62.00 $53.00 $60.00 $48.00 $38.00 $134.38 $121.40 $80.00 $80.00 Annualized Direct Salary Rate
(or enter Negotiated Billing Rate) $145.00 $135.00 $68.50 $57.50 $52.50 $41.00 $37.50 $93.60 $96.76 $72.46 $78.63 $131.21 $110.00 $62.00 $53.00 $60.00 $48.00 $38.00 $134.38 $121.40 $80.00 $80.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Task # Fully Burdened Billing Rate $401.83 $374.12 $189.83 $159.35 $145.49 $113.62 $103.92 $259.39 $268.14 $200.80 $217.90 $363.61 $304.84 $171.82 $146.88 $166.27 $133.02 $105.31 $341.02 $308.08 $203.02 $203.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6 106 150 96 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 40 0 0 0 0 56 6 0 472 40106 60933 0 101039 10104 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2046 2674 0 4721 472

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design 8 12 20 40 2862 4348 0 7210 721 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants 16 16 1096 1665 0 2761 276 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance 8 8 548 833 0 1381 138 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files 16 16 920 1398 0 2318 232 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule 8 8 16 1628 2473 0 4101 410 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.6 Meetings 4 32 44 80 7914 12024 0 19938 1994 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.7 City Meetings 2 8 8 18 1918 2914 0 4832 483 8 8 16 2046 2674 0 4721 472

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports 6 6 20 6 38 2409 3660 0 6069 607 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.9 Correspondence 4 8 12 1088 1653 0 2741 274 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance 4 8 40 52 6215 9443 0 15658 1566 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings 40 40 80 16 176 13508 20523 0 34031 3403 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 2300 3494 0 5794 579 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2.1 Data Gathering & Review 40 40 2300 3494 0 5794 579 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS 2 40 40 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 12760 19386 0 32145 3215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3.1 PDR Process 2 40 40 80 8 170 12760 19386 0 32145 3215 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ENGINEERING REPORTS 0 11 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 4814 7313 0 12127 1213 50 40 60 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 19575 25585 0 45160 4516

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases

4.1.1 Landscape Concept 1 4 4 9 724 1099 0 1823 182 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.2 Hydrology 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.3 Hydromodification 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.4 Water Quality 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.5 Drainage 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.6 Utility Requirement 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.7 Permit Requirement 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 40 40 40 40 160 16631 21737 0 38368 3837

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 10 20 30 2944 3848 0 6791 679

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.2.3 Lighting 1 4 5 409 621 0 1030 103 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 42 40 40 0 0 0 138 8727 13258 0 21985 2198 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5.1 Topographic Survey 1 1 2 4 303 460 0 762 76 0 0 0 0 0 0

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map 2 4 8 40 40 40 134 8424 12799 0 21223 2122 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION 6 42 80 44 136 280 280 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 46426 70535 0 116960 11696 10 20 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 10172 13295 0 23466 2347

6.1 35% Level Plans 4 24 64 40 120 240 240 16 16 764 38400 58341 0 96740 9674 10 20 40 40 110 10172 13295 0 23466 2347

6.2 Engineers Estimate 4 8 4 16 40 40 112 5298 8049 0 13347 1335 0 0 0 0 0 0

6.3 Environmental Clearance 1 4 4 9 959 1457 0 2416 242 0 0 0 0 0 0

6.4 Environmental Monitoring 2 4 6 544 826 0 1370 137 0 0 0 0 0 0

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule 1 8 9 1225 1861 0 3086 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION 0 86 160 0 120 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 526 35710 54254 0 89964 8996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7.1 ENA Support Services 86 160 120 120 40 526 35710 54254 0 89964 8996 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL Non-On-Call Tasks/Deliverables 14 287 479 180 256 480 280 16 4 8 20 48 9 42 40 40 96 6 0 2305 150842 229173 0 380015 38001 68 68 100 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 316 31793 41554 0 73347 7335 TOTAL On-Call Tasks/Deliverables 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 14 287 479 180 256 480 280 16 4 8 20 48 9 42 40 40 96 6 0 2305 150842 229173 0 380015 38001 68 68 100 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 316 31793 41554 0 73347 7335

ON-CALL TASKS/DELIVERABLES

DATA ENTRY SECTION
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate Prime Consultant: Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

NON-CONTINGENCY TASKS/DELIVERABLES
Form B1: Breakdown of Costs
% of budget in CY+1

CALCULATION SECTION
PROJECT NAME: Union City Project No. 18-04, Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 (7th % of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate Street Connection) and Phase 2 (Gateway Connection)
ALAMEDACTC CONTRACT NUMBER:

Annualization Factor
Fringe Rate
% of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate
% of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
Annualization Factor
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
AECOM
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead
and Fringe rates. Escalation not
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 248 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Names and Classification
Direct Salary Rate (Average, Actual, Max) for Current Year Annualized Direct Salary Rate
(or enter Negotiated Billing Rate)
Task # Fully Burdened Billing Rate
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule

1.1.6 Meetings

1.1.7 City Meetings

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports

1.1.9 Correspondence

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings
2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW

2.1 Data Gathering & Review
3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS

3.1 PDR Process
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases

4.1.1 Landscape Concept

4.1.2 Hydrology

4.1.3 Hydromodification

4.1.4 Water Quality

4.1.5 Drainage

4.1.6 Utility Requirement

4.1.7 Permit Requirement

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals

4.2.3 Lighting
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING

5.1 Topographic Survey

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map
6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION

6.1 35% Level Plans

6.2 Engineers Estimate

6.3 Environmental Clearance

6.4 Environmental Monitoring

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule
7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION

7.1 ENA Support Services
TOTAL Non-On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL

ON-CALL TASKS/DELIVERABLES

NON-CONTINGENCY TASKS/DELIVERABLES
Form B1: Breakdown of Costs
PROJECT NAME: Union City Project No. 18-04, Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 (7th Street Connection) and Phase 2 (Gateway Connection)
ALAMEDACTC CONTRACT NUMBER: 100.00% 110.40% 100.00% 108.87%

0.00% 33.27% 0.00% 67.10%

0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10.00%

0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00%

1.0000 1.0000
Steve Castellano, Managing
Consultant
Matthew Schock, Managing
Consultant
James Richards, Managing Consultant
Consultant III
Consultant II
Appraiser III
Appraiser II
Right of Way Technician
Administrative Support
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit Mike Vidra Sr. Proj. Manager
Robert Stevens Sr. Proj. Manager
Christopher Ethier Engineer II
Alisson Avancini Engineer I
Joseph Gebre, Engineer I
Zihong Huang Engineer II
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit $67.31 $79.52 $79.57 $70.00 $50.00 $75.00 $65.00 $35.00 $35.00 $69.75 $69.75 $50.00 $34.00 $33.00 $38.00 $67.31 $79.52 $79.57 $70.00 $50.00 $75.00 $65.00 $35.00 $35.00 $69.75 $69.75 $50.00 $34.00 $33.00 $38.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $180.42 $213.14 $213.28 $187.63 $134.02 $201.03 $174.22 $93.81 $93.81 $211.74 $211.74 $151.78 $103.21 $100.18 $115.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 3669 6456 0 10125 1013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 837 1473 0 2310 231
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 600 1056 0 1656 166
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 279 491 0 770 77
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 279 491 0 770 77
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 279 491 0 770 77
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 279 491 0 770 77
0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 837 1473 0 2310 231
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 279 491 0 770 77
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1116 1964 0 3080 308 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 1116 1964 0 3080 308
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 1758 3094 0 4852 485 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 32 1758 3094 0 4852 485
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 5116 9003 0 14119 1412 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 16 80 96 5116 9003 0 14119 1412
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 2888 4149 0 7038 704 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 8 8 40 2888 4149 0 7038 704 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 6975 12274 0 19249 1925 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 60 100 6975 12274 0 19249 1925
24 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 2888 4149 0 7038 704 52 132 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 18634 32790 0 51424 5142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 2888 4149 0 7038 704 52 132 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 18634 32790 0 51424 5142 % of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate % of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate

MULTIPLIERS MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate % of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate % of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate % of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate Annualization Factor Annualization Factor
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate % of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION AR/WS CSW/ST2
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 249 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Names and Classification
Direct Salary Rate (Average, Actual, Max) for Current Year Annualized Direct Salary Rate
(or enter Negotiated Billing Rate)
Task # Fully Burdened Billing Rate
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule

1.1.6 Meetings

1.1.7 City Meetings

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports

1.1.9 Correspondence

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings
2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW

2.1 Data Gathering & Review
3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS

3.1 PDR Process
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases

4.1.1 Landscape Concept

4.1.2 Hydrology

4.1.3 Hydromodification

4.1.4 Water Quality

4.1.5 Drainage

4.1.6 Utility Requirement

4.1.7 Permit Requirement

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals

4.2.3 Lighting
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING

5.1 Topographic Survey

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map
6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION

6.1 35% Level Plans

6.2 Engineers Estimate

6.3 Environmental Clearance

6.4 Environmental Monitoring

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule
7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION

7.1 ENA Support Services
TOTAL Non-On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL

ON-CALL TASKS/DELIVERABLES

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 98.48%

0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10.00%

0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00%

1.0000 1.0000
Jeriann Alexander, PE, Principal
Engineer
Karen Emery-Tonkovich, PG,
Principal Geologist
Ecem Isleyen, Lead GIS Specialist
Marissa McCallum Technical Editor,
Word Processing
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit Lisa Spivak
Survey ManagerJonathon Correa
Sr. Project Surveyor
Joe Vargas
Field Supervisor
Survey Analyst
Survey Technician
Survey Clerical
Party Chief
Chainman
Apprentice
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit $78.59 $61.78 $40.74 $30.85 $95.00 $65.00 $54.50 $45.00 $35.00 $30.00 $50.67 $43.66 $34.93 $78.59 $61.78 $40.74 $30.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $95.00 $65.00 $54.50 $45.00 $35.00 $30.00 $50.67 $43.66 $34.93 $297.70 $234.02 $154.32 $116.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $328.08 $224.47 $188.21 $155.41 $120.87 $103.60 $174.99 $150.78 $120.63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40 40 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 7047 17219 0 24266 2427 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40 40 20 20 120 7047 17219 0 24266 2427 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 40 0 0 40 40 0 50 130 6241 13353 50 19644 1959 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 40 40 40 50 130 6241 13353 50 19644 1959 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1404 3430 0 4834 483 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 10 20 1404 3430 0 4834 483 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 50 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 8450 20649 0 29099 2910 2 4 4 40 0 0 40 40 0 50 130 6241 13353 50 19644 1959 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 8450 20649 0 29099 2910 2 4 4 40 0 0 40 40 0 50 130 6241 13353 50 19644 1959 % of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate % of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION Fugro Guida Surveying
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 250 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Names and Classification
Direct Salary Rate (Average, Actual, Max) for Current Year Annualized Direct Salary Rate
(or enter Negotiated Billing Rate)
Task # Fully Burdened Billing Rate
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule

1.1.6 Meetings

1.1.7 City Meetings

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports

1.1.9 Correspondence

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings
2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW

2.1 Data Gathering & Review
3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS

3.1 PDR Process
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases

4.1.1 Landscape Concept

4.1.2 Hydrology

4.1.3 Hydromodification

4.1.4 Water Quality

4.1.5 Drainage

4.1.6 Utility Requirement

4.1.7 Permit Requirement

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals

4.2.3 Lighting
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING

5.1 Topographic Survey

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map
6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION

6.1 35% Level Plans

6.2 Engineers Estimate

6.3 Environmental Clearance

6.4 Environmental Monitoring

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule
7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION

7.1 ENA Support Services
TOTAL Non-On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL

ON-CALL TASKS/DELIVERABLES

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 36.56%

0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10.00%

0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00%

1.0000 1.0000
Principal EngineerPrincipal Engineer
Supervising Engineer
Senior Lead Civil Engineer
Senior Civil EngineerSenior Civil Designer
Staff Civil EIT II
Staff Civil EIT I
Staff Civil EIT
Senior Env. Scientist
Env. Scientist II
Senior Technician
Technical Editor/Project Coordinator
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit Rich Walter, ProjEct Director
Danielle Tannourji, PM/Permit Lead
Lindsay Christensen, CEQA Lead
Jennifer Oster, Deputy PM
Jennifer Haire, Wildlife Biology
Torrey Edell, Botany
Kevin MacKay, Restoration Design
James Elder, Archaeology
Jennifer Wildt, Archaology
Jonathon Rusch, Arch. History
Alan Barnard, Graphics
Melissa Johnson, GIS
Heatheer Hammermeister, Editory
Anthony Ha, Word Processor
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit $115.38 $106.73 $92.79 $72.12 $72.65 $55.00 $45.00 $40.00 $40.00 $45.63 $40.00 $34.08 $32.19 $95.36 $52.47 $45.56 $39.31 $59.35 $45.65 $86.34 $59.40 $50.48 $40.46 $49.11 $40.18 $41.62 $38.98 $115.38 $106.73 $92.79 $72.12 $72.65 $55.00 $45.00 $40.00 $40.00 $45.63 $40.00 $34.08 $32.19 $95.36 $52.47 $45.56 $39.31 $59.35 $45.65 $86.34 $59.40 $50.48 $40.46 $49.11 $40.18 $41.62 $38.98 $313.56 $290.06 $252.17 $196.00 $197.44 $149.47 $122.29 $108.71 $108.71 $124.01 $108.71 $92.62 $87.48 $284.00 $156.26 $135.68 $117.06 $176.76 $135.94 $257.13 $176.90 $150.34 $120.51 $146.27 $119.66 $123.95 $116.09 2 8 12 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 500 50 3738 5498 500 9736 924 45 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 560 81 6180 10552 560 17292 1673 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 8 12 16 500 38 3352 4929 500 8781 828 20 8 280 28 2327 3973 280 6580 630 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 8 280 28 2327 3973 280 6580 630
12 12 386 568 0 954 95 5 20 25 1526 2606 0 4132 413
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 4 8 8 0 0 36 1455 2140 0 3595 360 4 4 12 12 4 4 0 4 16 8 0 0 0 0 3,500 68 3399 5803 3500 12702 920 8 8 4 8 8 36 1455 2140 0 3595 360 4 4 12 12 4 4 4 16 8 3,500 68 3399 5803 3500 12702 920 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1144 1954 0 3098 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 1144 1954 0 3098 310
8 8 16 33 64 18 66 120 78 18 26 0 16 0 471 24547 36099 0 60647 6065 24 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 56 3870 6608 0 10478 1048 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 2 9 12 16 42 24 4 111 5454 8020 0 13474 1347 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 9 16 18 10 10 10 18 26 4 133 7228 10630 0 17858 1786 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 12 12 40 16 4 94 4658 6849 0 11507 1151 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 9 24 28 28 28 4 133 7208 10600 0 17808 1781 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 24 24 4 4 56 3870 6608 0 10478 1048
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 6 18 24 24 0 36 40 40 0 0 40 0 0 234 12661 18619 0 31279 3128 48 16 64 60 12 8 4 6 12 16 8 8 12 12 560 286 15405 26302 560 42267 4171 6 6 18 24 24 36 40 40 40 234 12661 18619 0 31279 3128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 24 40 60 8 8 2 12 12 8 8 8 8 560 198 9879 16867 560 27306 2675 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 4 4 40 2179 3720 0 5899 590
0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 4 4 4 4 48 3347 5715 0 9063 906
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 22 46 73 88 18 110 168 118 22 34 48 28 500 791 42401 62356 500 105257 10476 133 80 76 72 16 12 4 10 28 24 8 8 16 16 4,620 503 29998 51219 4620 85837 8122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 22 46 73 88 18 110 168 118 22 34 48 28 500 791 42401 62356 500 105257 10476 133 80 76 72 16 12 4 10 28 24 8 8 16 16 4,620 503 29998 51219 4620 85837 8122 % of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate
Annualization Factor
HDR Engineering, Inc.

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
Negotiated Profit Rate

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (C Accepted Overhead Rate
% of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
% of budget in CY+2

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY Accepted Overhead Rate
% of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate
Annualization Factor
ICF

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
These values will be zero if a firm
uses Negotiated Billing Rates
(NBRs); otherwise, use
applicable Overhead and Fringe
These values will be zero if a firm
uses Negotiated Billing Rates
(NBRs); otherwise, use applicable
Overhead and Fringe rates.

Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 251 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Names and Classification
Direct Salary Rate (Average, Actual, Max) for Current Year Annualized Direct Salary Rate
(or enter Negotiated Billing Rate)
Task # Fully Burdened Billing Rate
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule

1.1.6 Meetings

1.1.7 City Meetings

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports

1.1.9 Correspondence

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings
2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW

2.1 Data Gathering & Review
3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS

3.1 PDR Process
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases

4.1.1 Landscape Concept

4.1.2 Hydrology

4.1.3 Hydromodification

4.1.4 Water Quality

4.1.5 Drainage

4.1.6 Utility Requirement

4.1.7 Permit Requirement

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals

4.2.3 Lighting
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING

5.1 Topographic Survey

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map
6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION

6.1 35% Level Plans

6.2 Engineers Estimate

6.3 Environmental Clearance

6.4 Environmental Monitoring

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule
7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION

7.1 ENA Support Services
TOTAL Non-On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL

ON-CALL TASKS/DELIVERABLES

0.00% 105.89% 0.00% 40.52%

0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10.00%

0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00%

1.0000 1.0000
Damian Stefanakis Principal Planner
Aaron Elias Associate Engineer
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit G. PARIKH; PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
D.

WANG; PROJECT MANAGER & QAQC
F.

WANG; SEN. PROJECT ENGINEER

PROJECT ENGINEER

STAFF ENGINEER

PROJECT GEOLOGIST

FIELD ENGINEER

LABORATORY TECHNICIAN

DRAFTING CADD TECH
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit $71.70 $55.11 $104.21 $75.53 $69.76 $57.78 $38.68 $46.68 $51.22 $37.24 $40.62 $71.70 $55.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $104.21 $75.53 $69.76 $57.78 $38.68 $46.68 $51.22 $37.24 $40.62 $239.40 $184.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $299.11 $216.79 $200.23 $165.84 $111.02 $133.98 $147.01 $106.89 $116.59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 3638 7406 0 11044 1104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 40 60 3638 7406 0 11044 1104 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 58 84 132 73 4 42 52 12 30,800 481 27954 44987 30800 103741 7294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 24 58 84 132 73 4 42 52 12 30,800 481 27954 44987 30800 103741 7294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 3638 7406 0 11044 1104 24 58 84 132 73 4 42 52 12 30,800 481 27954 44987 30800 103741 7294 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 3638 7406 0 11044 1104 24 58 84 132 73 4 42 52 12 30,800 481 27954 44987 30800 103741 7294 Kittelson

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate
Annualization Factor
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY Accepted Overhead Rate
% of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate % of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate
Parikh

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate
Annualization Factor
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead
and Fringe rates. Escalation not
Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 252 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Names and Classification
Direct Salary Rate (Average, Actual, Max) for Current Year Annualized Direct Salary Rate
(or enter Negotiated Billing Rate)
Task # Fully Burdened Billing Rate
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule

1.1.6 Meetings

1.1.7 City Meetings

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports

1.1.9 Correspondence

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings
2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW

2.1 Data Gathering & Review
3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS

3.1 PDR Process
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases

4.1.1 Landscape Concept

4.1.2 Hydrology

4.1.3 Hydromodification

4.1.4 Water Quality

4.1.5 Drainage

4.1.6 Utility Requirement

4.1.7 Permit Requirement

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals

4.2.3 Lighting
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING

5.1 Topographic Survey

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map
6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION

6.1 35% Level Plans

6.2 Engineers Estimate

6.3 Environmental Clearance

6.4 Environmental Monitoring

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule
7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION

7.1 ENA Support Services
TOTAL Non-On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL

ON-CALL TASKS/DELIVERABLES

0.00% 70.498% 0.00% 64.80%

0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10.00%

0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00%

1.0000 1.0000
Christopher Kent
Principal
Kari Tanaka
Senior Landscape Architect
Charla Kaul
Landscape Architect
Adrienne Newton
Lnadscape Designer
Rober Towar
Irrigation Designer
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit Ivana Micic, Principal in Charge
Mimi Ahn, Senior Landscape
Architect
Erika Cesarino, Designer
Esther Sam, Graphics
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit $91.88 $51.92 $38.46 $36.54 $43.99 $81.73 $75.00 $29.81 $48.50 $91.88 $51.92 $38.46 $36.54 $43.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $81.73 $75.00 $29.81 $48.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $270.44 $152.83 $113.20 $107.54 $129.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $239.95 $220.19 $87.52 $142.39 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 263 440 0 703 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 5 263 440 0 703 70 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
62 72 28 92 0 0 0 0 0 412 254 13873 23249 412 37534 3712 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 72 28 92 412 254 13873 23249 412 37534 3712 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
55 80 35 45 30 0 0 0 0 0 245 13517 22652 0 36169 3617 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 80 35 45 30 245 13517 22652 0 36169 3617 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 59,500 128 6786 11326 59500 77612 1811 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 40 40 40 59,500 128 6786 11326 59500 77612 1811 118 153 64 138 31 0 0 0 0 412 504 27653 46341 412 74407 7399 8 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 59,500 128 6786 11326 59500 77612 1811 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 153 64 138 31 0 0 0 0 412 504 27653 46341 412 74407 7399 8 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 59,500 128 6786 11326 59500 77612 1811 ROMA Collaborative

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate % of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate Annualization Factor

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate % of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate % of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
PGAdesign

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate
Annualization Factor
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 253 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Names and Classification
Direct Salary Rate (Average, Actual, Max) for Current Year Annualized Direct Salary Rate
(or enter Negotiated Billing Rate)
Task # Fully Burdened Billing Rate
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1.1 Supervise, Coordinate and Monitor Design

1.1.2 Coordination with Design Consultants

1.1.3 Codes/Standards Compliance

1.1.4 Maintain Project Files

1.1.5 Update Project CPM Schedule

1.1.6 Meetings

1.1.7 City Meetings

1.1.8 Invoices, Progress Reports

1.1.9 Correspondence

1.1.10 Quality Control/Quality Assurance

1.1.11 Design Coordination Meetings
2 DATA GATHERING & REVIEW

2.1 Data Gathering & Review
3 PRE-DESIGN REPORT (PDR) PROCESS

3.1 PDR Process
4 ENGINEERING REPORTS

4.1 Enginering Reports - All Phases

4.1.1 Landscape Concept

4.1.2 Hydrology

4.1.3 Hydromodification

4.1.4 Water Quality

4.1.5 Drainage

4.1.6 Utility Requirement

4.1.7 Permit Requirement

4.1.8 Design Deviation/Exception

4.2 Engineering Reports - Phase 1 & 2

4.2.1 Hazardous Materials

4.2.2 Materials/Geotechnicals

4.2.3 Lighting
5 SURVEY AND RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING

5.1 Topographic Survey

5.2 R/W Engineering - Parcel Map
6 35% LEVEL OF DESIGN COMPLETION

6.1 35% Level Plans

6.2 Engineers Estimate

6.3 Environmental Clearance

6.4 Environmental Monitoring

6.5 Scope, Fee and Schedule
7 DEVELOPER COORDINATION

7.1 ENA Support Services
TOTAL Non-On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL On-Call Tasks/Deliverables
TOTAL

ON-CALL TASKS/DELIVERABLES

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 54.29%

0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 10.00%

0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 5.00%

1.0000 1.0000
Jeremy Chrzan, Principal-in-Charge
Cindy Zerger, Project Manager and
Design Lead
Craig Schoenberg, Senior Engineer
Joel Shaffer, Engineer III
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Planning
Lead
Inder Grewal, Planner II
Noah Halbach, Landscape Designer
Spencer Boomhower, Visualization
Specialist
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfit Daniel Yau / Engineer XII
Kin Chan / Engineer XI
Spencer Lee / Engineer VII
Jessica Wu / Engineer VI
Meng Yang / Engineer VI
Shannon Liao / Engineer III
Oscar Olais / Engineer I
Teresa Chan / Technician III
Direct Expenses ($)HoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTOTAL COSTProfitHoursEscalated Direct Labor or NBR $Fringe/OverheadDirect ExpensesTotal CostProfitTotal Cost + Profit % of Total Non-Contingency Labor Costs
$74.22 $66.27 $57.78 $45.27 $62.60 $38.47 $38.59 $44.14 $102.67 $95.17 $65.00 $62.50 $58.00 $36.00 $32.00 $26.80 $74.22 $66.27 $57.78 $45.27 $62.60 $38.47 $38.59 $44.14 $0.00 $102.67 $95.17 $65.00 $62.50 $58.00 $36.00 $32.00 $26.80 $0.00 $217.14 $193.88 $169.05 $132.45 $183.15 $112.55 $112.90 $129.14 $0.00 $213.60 $197.99 $135.23 $130.03 $120.66 $74.90 $66.57 $55.76 $0.00 0 22 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 500 30 1939 3219 500 5658 516 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 705 $ 57,679 $ 89,332 $ 1,560 $ 148,572 $ 14,701 $ 163,273 14.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 $ 2,862 $ 4,348 $ - $ 7,210 $ 721 $ 7,931 0.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 $ 1,933 $ 3,138 $ - $ 5,071 $ 507 $ 5,578 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 $ 548 $ 833 $ - $ 1,381 $ 138 $ 1,519 0.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 $ 1,520 $ 2,454 $ - $ 3,974 $ 397 $ 4,371 0.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 $ 1,628 $ 2,473 $ - $ 4,101 $ 410 $ 4,512 0.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 $ 13,872 $ 21,417 $ 780 $ 36,069 $ 3,529 $ 39,598 3.5% 6 4 4 500 14 879 1459 500 2838 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 $ 7,449 $ 11,512 $ 780 $ 19,741 $ 1,896 $ 21,637 1.9% 8 8 530 880 0 1410 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 $ 5,131 $ 8,205 $ - $ 13,335 $ 1,334 $ 14,669 1.3% 8 8 530 880 0 1410 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $ 1,897 $ 3,024 $ - $ 4,921 $ 492 $ 5,413 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 $ 7,052 $ 10,916 $ - $ 17,968 $ 1,797 $ 19,764 1.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 $ 13,787 $ 21,014 $ - $ 34,801 $ 3,480 $ 38,281 3.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 $ 8,533 $ 13,841 $ 3,500 $ 25,874 $ 2,237 $ 28,112 2.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 $ 8,533 $ 13,841 $ 3,500 $ 25,874 $ 2,237 $ 28,112 2.2% 4 2 8 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1978 3283 0 5261 526 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 $ 21,279 $ 35,122 $ - $ 56,400 $ 5,640 $ 62,040 5.6% 4 2 8 24 38 1978 3283 0 5261 526 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 $ 21,279 $ 35,122 $ - $ 56,400 $ 5,640 $ 62,040 5.6% 4 12 24 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 3203 5316 0 8519 852 12 24 48 0 0 0 48 0 0 99 132 8172 7284 99 15555 1546 1915 $ 118,172 $ 182,663 $ 31,311 $ 332,145 $ 30,083 $ 362,229 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 263 $ 14,597 $ 24,348 $ 412 $ 39,357 $ 3,894 $ 43,251 3.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 $ 5,863 $ 8,642 $ - $ 14,505 $ 1,450 $ 15,955 1.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 $ 7,637 $ 11,251 $ - $ 18,888 $ 1,889 $ 20,777 1.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 $ 5,067 $ 7,471 $ - $ 12,537 $ 1,254 $ 13,791 1.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 $ 7,617 $ 11,221 $ - $ 18,838 $ 1,884 $ 20,722 1.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 $ 5,525 $ 9,624 $ - $ 15,149 $ 1,515 $ 16,664 1.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 $ 4,279 $ 7,230 $ - $ 11,509 $ 1,151 $ 12,660 1.1% 4 12 24 16 56 3203 5316 0 8519 852 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 $ 20,243 $ 27,675 $ - $ 47,918 $ 4,792 $ 52,710 4.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 $ 10,399 $ 21,688 $ - $ 32,087 $ 3,209 $ 35,296 3.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 486 $ 28,363 $ 45,608 $ 30,800 $ 104,771 $ 7,397 $ 112,168 7.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24 48 48 99 132 8172 7284 99 15555 1546 137 $ 8,581 $ 7,905 $ 99 $ 16,585 $ 1,649 $ 18,234 1.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308 $ 17,856 $ 30,761 $ 50 $ 48,666 $ 4,862 $ 53,528 4.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 $ 6,544 $ 13,813 $ 50 $ 20,406 $ 2,036 $ 22,442 2.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 $ 11,312 $ 16,948 $ - $ 28,260 $ 2,826 $ 31,086 2.8% 4 8 40 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 4225 7012 0 11236 1124 18 48 80 32 0 0 88 64 0 146 330 18147 16175 146 34468 3432 2201 $ 121,956 $ 178,019 $ 706 $ 300,681 $ 29,997 $ 330,678 29.9% 4 8 40 24 76 4225 7012 0 11236 1124 16 40 64 32 64 64 118 280 15373 13702 118 29192 2907 1709 $ 94,347 $ 133,619 $ 118 $ 228,084 $ 22,797 $ 250,881 22.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 16 24 28 50 2775 2473 28 5276 525 182 $ 9,476 $ 13,952 $ 28 $ 23,457 $ 2,343 $ 25,800 2.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 $ 10,838 $ 18,324 $ 560 $ 29,722 $ 2,916 $ 32,638 2.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 $ 2,723 $ 4,546 $ - $ 7,269 $ 727 $ 7,996 0.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 $ 4,572 $ 7,577 $ - $ 12,149 $ 1,215 $ 13,364 1.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 754 $ 49,471 $ 77,854 $ 59,500 $ 186,826 $ 12,733 $ 199,558 12.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 754 $ 49,471 $ 77,854 $ 59,500 $ 186,826 $ 12,733 $ 199,558 12.7% 12 44 76 64 4 0 0 0 0 500 200 11345 18830 500 30676 3018 30 72 128 32 0 0 136 64 0 245 462 26320 23459 245 50023 4978 6360 $ 394,945 $ 607,592 $ 96,627 $ 1,099,164 $ 100,254 $ 1,199,418 0.919194076 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 12 44 76 64 4 0 0 0 0 500 200 11345 18830 500 30676 3018 30 72 128 32 0 0 136 64 0 245 462 26320 23459 245 50023 4978 6,360 $ 394,945 $ 607,592 $ 96,627 $ 1,099,164 $ 100,254 $ 1,199,418 Summary

CALCULATION SECTION
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate
Annualization Factor
TDG Engineering

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate % of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
Y&C Transportation Consultants

DATA ENTRY SECTION CALCULATION SECTION
% of budget in CY+2 Negotiated Profit Rate
% of budget in CY+3 Annual Escalation Rate
Annualization Factor

MULTIPLIERS
% of budget in Current Year (CY) Accepted Overhead Rate % of budget in CY+1 Fringe Rate
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
These values will be zero if a firm uses
Negotiated Billing Rates (NBRs);
otherwise, use applicable Overhead and
Fringe rates. Escalation not applicable to
Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 254 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B2: Breakdown of Costs Summary
Total Non-Contingency Hours 6360
Total Non-Contingency Labor Costs $ 1,002,537.04
Total Non-Contingency Direct Expenses $ 96,627.00
Total Non-Contingency Costs $ 1,099,164.04
Total Non-Contingency Profit $ 100,253.70
Total Non-Contingency Cost + Profit $ 1,199,417.74
Total Contingency Hours 0
Total Contingency Labor Costs $ -
Total Contingency Direct Expenses $ -
Total Contingency Costs $ -
Total Contingency Profit $ -
Total Contingency Cost + Profit $ -
PROJECT NAME: Union City Project No. 18-04, Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 (7th Street Connection) and Phase 2 (Gateway Connection) City Council/RSA Agenda 255 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B3: Contact Information by Firm
# Firm Name LBE, SLBE, VSLBE and/or DBE Status Street Address City State Zip Code Contact Name Contact Title Phone No. Email 1 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. LBE 456 8th Street, Suite 200B Oakland CA 94607 Shawn O'Keefe Principal, Vice President (925) 858-8581 [email protected] 2 AECOM LBE 300 Lakeview Drive, Suite 400 Oakland CA 94612 Etty Mercurio Vice President (925) 980-2253 [email protected] 3 Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. LBE, SLBE 7901 Stoneridge Drive, Ste 550 Pleasanton CA 94588 Matthew Schock Vice President (925) 691-8500 [email protected] 4 CSW|ST2 LBE, SLBE 5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd - #203 Pleasanton CA 94588 Robert Stevens CEO (415) 533-1864 [email protected] 5 Fugro USA Land, Inc. LBE 469 Roland Way Oakland CA 94621 Jeriann Alexander Principal Engineer (510) 610-8052 [email protected] 6 Guida Surveying, Inc. LBE, SLBE 4695 Chabot Road, Suite 115 Pleasanton CA 94588 Lisa Spivak, PLS Survey Manager (949) 777-2000 [email protected] 7 HDR Engineering, Inc. LBE 1243 Alpine Road, Suite 108 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Analette Ochoa Associate Vice President (925) 395-9515 [email protected] 8 ICF None 210 Mission St., #1500 San Francisco CA 94521 Rich Walter Vice President (510) 290-1860 [email protected] 9 Kittelson & Assoc, Inc. LBE 155 Grand Avenue, Suite 505 Oakland CA 94612 Damian Stefanakis Principal Planner (510) 433-8083 [email protected] 10 PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. LBE, SLBE, DBE 333 HEGENBERGER Road OAKLAND CA 94621 F. WANG PRINCIPAL (669) 213-1453 [email protected] 11 PGAdesign LBE, SLBE, VSLBE 444 17th Street Oakland CA 94706 Christopher Kent Principal (510) 550-8851 [email protected] 12 TDG Engineering LLC, subsidiary of Toole Design Group, LLC LBE 1322 Webster Street, Suite 208 Oakland CA 94612 Cindy Zerger California Urban Design Director (510) 919-8107 [email protected] 13 Y&C Transportation Consultants, Inc. LBE, SLBE, VSLBE, DBE 200 Brown Road, Suite 108 Fremont CA 94539 Daniel Yau Principal (510) 566-2755 [email protected] 14 ROMA Collaborative None 1527 Stockton St, 2nd Fl. San Francisco CA 94133 Ivana Micic Principal (415) 616-9900 [email protected] City Council/RSA Agenda 256 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B4: LBCE Program Participation Summary
THIS TAB IS REQUIRED FOR PROCUREMENTS SUBJECT TO THE LOCAL BUSINESS CONTRACT EQUITY (LBCE) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS; DO NOT USE FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE).

The LBCE Program goals for professional services are 70.0% for Local Business Enterprise (LBE) and 30.0% for Small Local Business Enterprise (SLBE).

Vendor Tier Budget LBE SLBE VSLBE Certification Status LBE SLBE VSLBE

NON-CONTINGENCY TASKS/DELIVERABLES
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Prime $418,016.49 $418,016.49 $0 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, MAR20200415-01
exp. 2022-04-30 X
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. Tier 1 $80,681.20 $80,681.20 $0 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, AEC20210930-01
exp. 2023-09-30 X
Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. Tier 1 $7,741.34 $7,741.34 $7,741.34 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, ASS20201201-02
exp. 2022-12-31 X X
Bonnie Fisher Tier 2 under ROMA 17,500.00 $ $0 $0 $0 None Boris Dramov Tier 2 under ROMA 42,000.00 $ $0 $0 $0 None Cal Safety Tier 2 under PARIKH $112.00 $112.00 $112.00 $112.00 Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, VSLBE, CAL20201228-03
exp. 2022-12-31 X X X
CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. Tier 1 $56,566.67 $56,566.67 $56,566.67 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, CSW20201026-02
exp. 2022-10-31 X X
Driller TBD Tier 2 under PARIKH $4,060.00 $0 $0 $0 None Fugro USA Land, Inc. Tier 1 $32,009.40 $32,009.40 $0 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, FUG2020023-01
exp. 2022/03/31 X
GeoEx (Dixon) or EGS (San Jose) Tier 2 under PARIKH $280.00 $0 $0 $0 None Guida Surveying, Inc. Tier 1 $21,603.67 $21,603.67 $21,603.67 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, GUI20210930-02
exp. 2023-09-30 X X
HDR Engineering, Inc. Tier 1 $115,732.75 $115,732.75 $0 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, HDR20200323-01
exp. 2022-03-31 X
ICF Tier 1 $93,959.17 $0 $0 $0 None
Kittelson & Assoc, Inc. Tier 1 $12,148.40 $12,148.40 $0 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, KIT20191121-01
exp. 2021-11-30 X
Parikh Consultants, Inc. Tier 1 $106,182.70 $106,182.70 $106,182.70 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, PAR20200526-02
exp. 2022-05-31 X X
PGA Design Inc. Tier 1 $81,806.14 $81,806.14 $81,806.14 $81,806.14 Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, VSLBE, PGA20210505-03
exp. 2023-05-31 X X X
ROMA Collaborative Tier 1 $19,923.72 $0 $0 $0 None
Sunland (Sacramento) Tier 2 under PARIKH $400.00 $0 $0 $0 None Toole Design Group, LLC Tier 1 $33,693.13 $33,693.13 $0 $0 Alameda CTC LBE, TOO20210420-01
exp. 2023-04-30 X
Y&C Transportation Consultants, Inc. Tier 1 $55,000.96 $55,000.96 $55,000.96 $55,000.96 Alameda CTC LBE, SLBE, Y&C20210524-03
exp. 2023-05-31 X X X
TOTAL NON-CONTINGENCY $1,199,417.74 $1,021,294.85 $329,013.48 $136,919.10 GOAL ACHIEVEMENT 85.1% 27.4% 11.4%

PROCURING AGENCY TO COMPLETE THIS BOX
Name of Reviewer:
/S/ [Type Name of Reviewer here]
Alameda CTC Breakdown of Costs Worksheet rev 08/13
Printed 12/21/2021
City Council/RSA Agenda 257 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
B-2 CHARGE RATE SCHEDULE
City Council/RSA Agenda 258 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B7: Fixed Hourly Rate Schedule by Firm Make everyone 5% COLUMN P IS FOR EXEC Amendments Only
Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Direct Salary
Rate
($)
Fringe Rate
(%)
Overhead Rate
(%)
Indirect Cost
Rate
(%)
Profit Rate
(%)
Salary Cost
Factor
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Annual
Escalation Rate
(%)
Added or Revised
by Amendment
("Added" or
"Revised")
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Sasha Dansky* Principal-in-Charge $145.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $401.83 $421.92 $443.02 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Shawn O'Keefe* Principal-in-Charge/ Project Man $135.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $374.12 $392.82 $412.46 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Danielle Sanchez* Deputy Project Manager $68.50 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $189.83 $199.32 $209.29 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Engineer $57.50 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $159.35 $167.31 $175.68 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Project Engineer $52.50 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $145.49 $152.76 $160.40 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Design Engineer II $41.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $113.62 $119.30 $125.27 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Design Engineer I $37.50 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $103.92 $109.12 $114.57 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Deputy District Manager $93.60 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $259.39 $272.36 $285.97 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD CM Division Manager $96.76 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $268.14 $281.55 $295.63 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Operations Manager $72.46 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $200.80 $210.84 $221.39 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD LAUD Division Manager $78.63 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $217.90 $228.80 $240.24 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Engineering Manager $131.21 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $363.61 $381.79 $400.88 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Survey Division Manager $110.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $304.84 $320.08 $336.08 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Surveyor $62.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $171.82 $180.41 $189.43 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Sruveyor $53.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $146.88 $154.22 $161.93 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Lead Survey Technician $60.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $166.27 $174.59 $183.32 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Coordinator $48.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $133.02 $139.67 $146.65 5.00% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. TBD Sr. Project Assistant $38.00 93.92% 58.01% 151.93% 10.00% 2.7712 $105.31 $110.57 $116.10 5.00% AECOM Etty Mercurio Design Manager $134.38 0.00% 130.70% 130.70% 10.00% 2.5377 $341.02 $358.07 $375.97 5.00% AECOM Tom Barnard Sr Sturctures Eng $121.40 0.00% 130.70% 130.70% 10.00% 2.5377 $308.08 $323.48 $339.65 5.00% AECOM TBD Track Eng $80.00 0.00% 130.70% 130.70% 10.00% 2.5377 $203.02 $213.17 $223.83 5.00% AECOM TBD Structures Eng $80.00 0.00% 130.70% 130.70% 10.00% 2.5377 $203.02 $213.17 $223.83 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. Steve Castellano* Managing Consultant $67.31 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $180.42 $189.44 $198.91 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. James Richards Managing Consultant $79.57 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $213.28 $223.94 $235.14 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. Matthew Schock Managing Consultant $79.52 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $213.14 $223.80 $234.99 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Consultant III $70.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $187.63 $197.01 $206.86 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Consultant II $50.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $134.02 $140.72 $147.76 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Consultant I $40.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $107.21 $112.58 $118.20 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Appraiser III $75.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $201.03 $211.08 $221.63 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Appraiser II $65.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $174.22 $182.94 $192.08 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Appraiser I $50.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $134.02 $140.72 $147.76 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Right of Way Technician $35.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $93.81 $98.50 $103.43 5.00% Associated Right of Way Services, Inc. TBD Administrative Support $35.00 33.27% 110.40% 143.67% 10.00% 2.6804 $93.81 $98.50 $103.43 5.00% CSW|ST2 Michael Vidra Sr. Project Manager $69.75 67.10% 108.87% 175.97% 10.00% 3.0357 $211.74 $222.32 $233.44 5.00% CSW|ST2 Robert Stevens Sr. Project Manager $69.75 67.10% 108.87% 175.97% 10.00% 3.0357 $211.74 $222.32 $233.44 5.00% CSW|ST2 Cristopher Ethier Engineer II $50.00 67.10% 108.87% 175.97% 10.00% 3.0357 $151.78 $159.37 $167.34 5.00% CSW|ST2 Alisson Avancini Engineer I $34.00 67.10% 108.87% 175.97% 10.00% 3.0357 $103.21 $108.37 $113.79 5.00% CSW|ST2 Joseph Gebre Engineer I $33.00 67.10% 108.87% 175.97% 10.00% 3.0357 $100.18 $105.19 $110.45 5.00% CSW|ST2 Zhihong Huang Engineer II $38.00 67.10% 108.87% 175.97% 10.00% 3.0357 $115.36 $121.12 $127.18 5.00% Fugro USA Land, Inc. Jeriann Alexander Principal Engineer/Hazardous M $78.59 0.00% 244.36% 244.36% 10.00% 3.7880 $297.70 $312.58 $328.21 5.00% Fugro USA Land, Inc. Karen Emery-Tonkovich Principal Geologist/Hazardous M $61.78 0.00% 244.36% 244.36% 10.00% 3.7880 $234.02 $245.72 $258.01 5.00% Fugro USA Land, Inc. Ecem Isleyen Senior Geologist/GIS Specialist $40.74 0.00% 244.36% 244.36% 10.00% 3.7880 $154.32 $162.04 $170.14 5.00% Fugro USA Land, Inc. Marissa McCallum Senior Editor/Word Processing $30.85 0.00% 244.36% 244.36% 10.00% 3.7880 $116.86 $122.70 $128.84 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Lisa Spivak Survey Manager $95.00 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $328.08 $344.48 $361.71 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Justin Height Sr. Project Surveyor $72.00 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $248.65 $261.08 $274.13 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Jonathon Correa Sr. Project Surveyor $65.00 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $224.47 $235.70 $247.48 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Project Surveyor Project Surveyor $55.00 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $189.94 $199.44 $209.41 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Joe Vargas Field Supervisor $54.50 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $188.21 $197.62 $207.50 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Sr. Survey Analyst Sr. Survey Analyst $50.00 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $172.67 $181.31 $190.37 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Survey Analyst Survey Analyst $45.00 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $155.41 $163.18 $171.33 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Survey Technician Survey Technician $35.00 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $120.87 $126.91 $133.26 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Party Chief† Party Chief† $50.67 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $174.99 $183.74 $192.92 5.00% City Council/RSA Agenda 259 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B7: Fixed Hourly Rate Schedule by Firm Make everyone 5% COLUMN P IS FOR EXEC Amendments Only
Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Direct Salary
Rate
($)
Fringe Rate
(%)
Overhead Rate
(%)
Indirect Cost
Rate
(%)
Profit Rate
(%)
Salary Cost
Factor
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Annual
Escalation Rate
(%)
Added or Revised
by Amendment
("Added" or
"Revised")
Guida Surveying, Inc. Chainman† Chainman† $43.66 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $150.78 $158.32 $166.23 5.00% Guida Surveying, Inc. Apprentice† Apprentice† $34.93 98.48% 115.47% 213.95% 10.00% 3.4535 $120.63 $126.66 $132.99 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Han-Bin Liang Principal Engineer $115.38 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $313.56 $329.24 $345.70 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Analette Ochoa Principal Engineer $106.73 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $290.06 $304.56 $319.79 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. TBD Supervising Engineer $92.79 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $252.17 $264.78 $278.02 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Jennifer Abrams Senior Lead Civil Engineer $72.12 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $196.00 $205.80 $216.09 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Raja Periketi, Kazuya Tsurushita Senior Civil Engineer $72.65 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $197.44 $207.31 $217.68 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Andrew Chin Senior Civil Designer $55.00 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $149.47 $156.94 $164.79 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Patrick Yim Staff Civil EIT II $45.00 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $122.29 $128.41 $134.83 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Alejandra Rodriguez Coss Y LeoStaff Civil EIT I $40.00 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $108.71 $114.14 $119.85 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. TBD Staff Civil EIT $40.00 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $108.71 $114.14 $119.85 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Christine Boschen Senior Env. Scientist $45.63 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $124.01 $130.21 $136.72 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Ashley Chan, Jada Golland Env. Scientist II $40.00 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $108.71 $114.14 $119.85 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. Mei Du Senior Technician $34.08 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $92.62 $97.25 $102.11 5.00% HDR Engineering, Inc. TBD Technical Editor/Project Coordi $32.19 0.00% 147.06% 147.06% 10.00% 2.7177 $87.48 $91.86 $96.45 5.00% ICF Rich Walter Project Director $95.36 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $284.00 $298.20 $313.11 5.00% ICF Danielle Tannourji Project Manager/Permit Lead $52.47 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $156.26 $164.07 $172.28 5.00% ICF Lindsay Christensen CEQA Lead $45.56 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $135.68 $142.47 $149.59 5.00% ICF Jennifer Ostner Deputy Project Manager $39.31 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $117.06 $122.91 $129.06 5.00% ICF Jennifer Haire Wildlife Biology $59.35 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $176.76 $185.59 $194.87 5.00% ICF Torrey Edell Botany $45.65 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $135.94 $142.74 $149.87 5.00% ICF Kevin Mackay Restoration Design $86.34 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $257.13 $269.98 $283.48 5.00% ICF James Elder Archaeology $59.40 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $176.90 $185.75 $195.04 5.00% ICF Jennifer Wildt Archaeology $50.48 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $150.34 $157.85 $165.75 5.00% ICF Jonathon Rusch Architectural History $40.46 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $120.51 $126.53 $132.86 5.00% ICF Alan Barnard Graphics $49.11 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $146.27 $153.58 $161.26 5.00% ICF Melissa Johnson GIS $40.18 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $119.66 $125.65 $131.93 5.00% ICF Heather Hammermeister Editing $41.62 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $123.95 $130.14 $136.65 5.00% ICF Anthony Ha Word Processing $38.98 36.56% 134.18% 170.74% 10.00% 2.9781 $116.09 $121.89 $127.99 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Damian Stefanakis * Principal Planner $71.70 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $239.40 $251.37 $263.94 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Aaron Elias * Associate Engineer $55.11 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $184.01 $193.21 $202.87 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Senior Principal Engineer/Plann $91.71 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $306.21 $321.52 $337.60 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Principal Engineer/Planner $73.13 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $244.18 $256.39 $269.20 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Associate Engineer/Planner $65.31 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $218.07 $228.97 $240.42 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Senior Engineer/Planner $55.00 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $183.64 $192.82 $202.46 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Engineer/Planner $47.19 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $157.56 $165.44 $173.71 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Transportation Analyst $36.11 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $120.57 $126.60 $132.93 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Technician I $30.73 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $102.61 $107.74 $113.12 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Technician II $40.39 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $134.86 $141.60 $148.68 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Senior Technician $43.96 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $146.78 $154.12 $161.82 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Associate Technician $49.19 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $164.24 $172.45 $181.08 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Office Support $26.44 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $88.28 $92.70 $97.33 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Software Technician $24.35 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $81.30 $85.37 $89.64 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Data Analyst/Software Develope $35.74 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $119.33 $125.30 $131.57 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Data Scientist/Developer $49.22 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $164.34 $172.56 $181.19 5.00% Kittelson & Associates, Inc. TBD Senior Data Scientist/Developer $60.10 105.89% 97.65% 203.54% 10.00% 3.3389 $200.67 $210.70 $221.24 5.00% PGAdesign Christopher Kent* Principal $91.88 70.50% 97.08% 167.58% 10.00% 2.9434 $270.44 $283.96 $298.16 5.00% PGAdesign Kari Tanaka* Senior Landscape Architect $51.92 70.50% 97.08% 167.58% 10.00% 2.9434 $152.83 $160.47 $168.49 5.00% PGAdesign Charla Kaul* Landscape Architect $38.46 70.50% 97.08% 167.58% 10.00% 2.9434 $113.20 $118.86 $124.81 5.00% PGAdesign Adrienne Newton* Landscape Designer $36.54 70.50% 97.08% 167.58% 10.00% 2.9434 $107.54 $112.92 $118.57 5.00% PGAdesign Robert Towar* Irrigation Designer $43.99 70.50% 97.08% 167.58% 10.00% 2.9434 $129.47 $135.95 $142.75 5.00% ROMA Collaborative Ivana Micic * Principal in Charge $81.73 64.80% 102.10% 166.90% 10.00% 2.9359 $239.95 $251.95 $264.55 5.00% ROMA Collaborative Mimi Ahn Senior Landscape Architect $75.00 64.80% 102.10% 166.90% 10.00% 2.9359 $220.19 $231.20 $242.76 5.00% ROMA Collaborative Erika Cesarino Designer $29.81 64.80% 102.10% 166.90% 10.00% 2.9359 $87.52 $91.90 $96.49 5.00% City Council/RSA Agenda 260 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Form B7: Fixed Hourly Rate Schedule by Firm Make everyone 5% COLUMN P IS FOR EXEC Amendments Only
Vendor Name Personnel Name Title and/or Role
Direct Salary
Rate
($)
Fringe Rate
(%)
Overhead Rate
(%)
Indirect Cost
Rate
(%)
Profit Rate
(%)
Salary Cost
Factor
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Fixed Hourly
Rate
($)
Effective Period
MM/DD/YYMM/DD/YY
Annual
Escalation Rate
(%)
Added or Revised
by Amendment
("Added" or
"Revised")
ROMA Collaborative Esther Sam Graphics $48.50 64.80% 102.10% 166.90% 10.00% 2.9359 $142.39 $149.51 $156.99 5.00% TDG Engineering Jeremy Chrzan Principal-in-Charge $74.22 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $217.14 $228.00 $239.40 5.00% TDG Engineering Cindy Zerger* Project Manager & Design Lead $66.27 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $193.88 $203.58 $213.76 5.00% TDG Engineering Craig Schoenberg Senior Engineer $57.78 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $169.05 $177.50 $186.37 5.00% TDG Engineering Joel Shaffer Engineer III $45.27 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $132.45 $139.07 $146.02 5.00% TDG Engineering Megan Wooley-Ousdahl* Planning Lead $62.60 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $183.15 $192.30 $201.92 5.00% TDG Engineering Inder Grewal Planner II $38.47 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $112.55 $118.18 $124.09 5.00% TDG Engineering Noah Halbach Landscape Designer $38.59 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $112.90 $118.55 $124.47 5.00% TDG Engineering Spencer Boomhauer Visualization Specialist $44.14 0.00% 165.97% 165.97% 10.00% 2.9257 $129.14 $135.60 $142.38 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Daniel Yau Engineer XII $102.67 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $213.60 $224.28 $235.49 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Kin Chan Engineer XI $95.17 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $197.99 $207.89 $218.29 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Spencer Lee Engineer VII $65.00 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $135.23 $141.99 $149.09 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Jessica Wu Engineer VI $62.50 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $130.03 $136.53 $143.35 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Meng Yang Engineer VI $58.00 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $120.66 $126.70 $133.03 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Shannon Liao Engineer III $36.00 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $74.90 $78.64 $82.57 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Oscar Olais Engineer I $32.00 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $66.57 $69.90 $73.40 5.00% Y&C Transp Consultants, Inc Teresa Chan Technician III $26.80 54.29% 34.84% 89.13% 10.00% 2.0804 $55.76 $58.54 $61.47 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. G. PARIKH * PIC $104.21 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $299.11 $314.06 $329.77 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. D. WANG * PROJECT MANAGER & QA-Q $75.53 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $216.79 $227.63 $239.01 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. F. WANG * SEN. PROJECT ENGINEER $69.76 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $200.23 $210.24 $220.75 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. J. TURBAY Project Engineer $57.78 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $165.84 $174.13 $182.84 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Staff Engineer Staff Engineer $38.68 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $111.02 $116.57 $122.40 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Field Engineer Field Engineer $51.22 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $147.01 $154.36 $162.08 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. C. Langbein Project Geologist $46.68 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $133.98 $140.68 $147.72 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Lab. Technician Lab. Technician $37.00 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $106.20 $111.51 $117.08 5.00% PARIKH CONSULTANTS, INC. Draftsperson-CADD Draftsperson-CADD $40.62 40.52% 120.41% 160.93% 10.00% 2.8702 $116.59 $122.42 $128.54 5.00%

0.00% #DIV/0! $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
An asterisk (*) by the name of the individuals listed above denotes Key Personnel.

An obelisk (†) by the name of the individuals listed above denotes personnel subject to prevailing wage requirements.

City Council/RSA Agenda 261 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
RATE SCHEDULE (P-1)
Engineering Services Survey Services
Intern $52 ‐ $90 Survey Intern $65 ‐ $112
Technician $72 ‐ $137 Survey Technician $85 ‐ $151
Planner I$85 ‐ $115 Sr. Survey Technician $98 ‐ $186
Design Engineer I $101 ‐ $144 Surveyor $118 ‐ $171
Planner II $111 ‐ $137 Sr. Surveyor $134 ‐ $198
Sr. Technician $124 ‐ $180 Lead Survey Technician $131 ‐ $218 Design Engineer II $131 ‐ $169 Project Surveyor $164 ‐ $216 Project Engineer $154 ‐ $191 Sr. Project Surveyor $180 ‐ $238 Sr. Project Engineer $167 ‐ $227 Survey Manager $191 ‐ $263 Sr. Technical Engineer $167 ‐ $227 Sr. Survey Manager $238 ‐ $311 Project Manager $200 ‐ $256 Survey Division Manager $284 ‐ $396 Technical Lead $200 ‐ $256 ** Single Chief $157 ‐ $216
Sr. Project Manager $232 ‐ $328 ** Single Instrumentman $150 ‐ $191 Sr. Technical Lead $222 ‐ $328 ** Single Chainman $132 ‐ $187 Engineering Manager $294 ‐ $378 ** Apprentice $71 ‐ $176 Practice Area Leader $294 ‐ $378 ** 1 Person Field Crew $157 ‐ $216 Sr. Engineering Manager $327 ‐ $450 ** 2 Person Field Crew $290 ‐ $403 Principal $422 ‐ $500 ** 3 Person Field Crew $361 ‐ $580 Drone Pilot $220
Construction Management Services
Office Technician $65 ‐ $108 Project Support/Coordination Services Office Engineer $115 ‐ $216 Project Assistant $72 ‐ $108 ** Asst. Resident Engineer $164 ‐ $297 Technical Writer $69 ‐ $115 ** Inspector ‐ CM $164 ‐ $297 Sr. Project Assistant $101 ‐ $137 RE/Structural Representative $213 ‐ $360 Project Coordinator $98 ‐ $144 Project Manager ‐ CM $213 ‐ $324 Graphic Designer $105 ‐ $162 Sr. Project Manager ‐ CM $229 ‐ $360 Sr. Technical Writer $105 ‐ $176 Area Manager ‐ CM $321 ‐ $468 Project Accountant $105 ‐ $162 Division Manager ‐ CM $294 ‐ $360 Sr. Project Coordinator $131 ‐ $173 Sr. Graphic Designer $118 ‐ $198
District Management Services Sr. Project Accountant $164 ‐ $223 ** Inspector ‐ Apprentice $69 ‐ $104 Sr. Graphic Manager $147 ‐ $216 ** Inspector $101 ‐ $140
** Sr. Inspector $128 ‐ $166 Urban Planning/Landscape Architecture Services Assistant Sanitary Engineer $144 ‐ $184 Landscape Intern $49 ‐ $90 Associate Sanitary Engineer $160 ‐ $216 Landscape Designer I $85 ‐ $115 Sanitary Project Engineer $160 ‐ $248 Landscape Designer II $111 ‐ $137 Sr. Sanitary Project Engineer $203 ‐ $295 Landscape Architect $115 ‐ $198 Operations Manager $232 ‐ $328 LAUD Division Manager $255 ‐ $284 Deputy District Manager $288 ‐ $353 LAUD Project Manager $193 ‐ $248 District Manager‐Engineer $321 ‐ $374 Sr. LAUD Project Manager $229 ‐ $281 Sr. LAUD Division Manager $268 ‐ $317
Grant Writing Services Special Services
Funding Specialist $158 Expert Witness $440
Sr. Funding Specialist $263 Strategic Consulting $440
Note: Additional Promotional Steps Exist within Various Rate Categories Reimbursables including, but not limited to:

Reproductions, Delivery and Filing Fees Cost Plus 5% Outside Consultant Fees Cost Plus 5% Mileage Per IRS Rate Survey Field Expenses Cost Plus 5%

HOURLY CHARGE RATE RANGES

OTHER DIRECT COSTS

EXHIBIT A
Expires June 30, 2022*
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. Rate Schedule
*Rates subject to escalation with new hourly rate schedule as of July 1, 2022 **These charge rates are subject to Prevailing Wage laws and Union contract. PAGE 1 OF 1 City Council/RSA Agenda 262 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

EXHIBIT C

PROVISIONS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC WORKS

CONTRACTS

PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE SECTION
1720 ET SEQ.

City Council/RSA Agenda 263 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Consulting Services Agreement between
City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

EXHIBIT C

PROVISIONS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE SECTION 1720 ET SEQ.

HOURS OF WORK:

A. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1810, 8 hours of labor in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall constitute a legal day’s work under this contract.

B. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1811, the time of service of any worker employed in performance of the services described in Exhibit A is limited to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours during any one calendar week, except in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1815, which provides that work in excess of eight hours during any one calendar day and forty hours during any one calendar week is permitted upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours during any one calendar day and forty hours during any one calendar week at not less than one-and-one-half times the basic rate of pay.

C. The Consultant and its subcontractors shall forfeit as a penalty to the City $25 for each worker employed in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day, or more than 40 hours in any one calendar week, in violation of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1810 and following.

WAGES:

A. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1773.2, the City has determined the general prevailing wages in the locality in which the services described in Exhibit A are to be performed for each craft or type of work needed to be as published by the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Statistics and Research, a copy of which is on file in the City Public Works Office and shall be made available on request. The Consultant and subcontractors engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall pay no less than these rates to all persons engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A.

B. In accordance with Labor Code Section 1775, the Consultant and any subcontractors engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall comply Labor Code Section 1775, which establishes a penalty of up to $50 per day for each worker engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A that the Consultant or any subcontractor pays less than the specified prevailing wage. The amount of such penalty shall be determined by the Labor Commissioner and shall be based on consideration of the mistake, inadvertence, or neglect of the Consultant or subcontractor in failing to pay the correct rate of prevailing wages, or the previous record of the Consultant or subcontractor in meeting applicable prevailing wage obligations, or the willful failure by the Consultant or subcontractor to pay the correct rates of prevailing wages. A mistake, inadvertence, or neglect in failing to pay the correct rate of prevailing wages is not excusable if the Consultant or subcontractor had knowledge of their obligations under the California Labor Code. The Consultant or subcontractor shall pay the difference between the prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate. If a subcontractor worker engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A City Council/RSA Agenda 264 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Consulting Services Agreement between
City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
is not paid the general prevailing per diem wages by the subcontractor, the Consultant is not liable for any penalties therefore unless the Consultant had knowledge of that failure or unless the Consultant fails to comply with all of the following requirements:

1. The contract executed between the Consultant and the subcontractor for the performance of part of the services described in Exhibit A shall include a copy of the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1771, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815.

2. The Consultant shall monitor payment of the specified general prevailing rate of per diem wages by the subcontractor by periodic review of the subcontractor’s certified payroll records.

3. Upon becoming aware of a subcontractor’s failure to pay the specified prevailing rate of wages, the Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify the failure, including, but not limited to, retaining sufficient funds due the subcontractor for performance of the services described in Exhibit A.

4. Prior to making final payment to the subcontractor, the Consultant shall obtain an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury from the subcontractor that the subcontractor has paid the specified general prevailing rate of per diem wages for employees engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhibit A and any amounts due pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1813.

C. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1776, the Consultant and each subcontractor engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall keep accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed in performance of the services described in Exhibit A. Each payroll record shall contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following:

1. The information contained in the payroll record is true and correct.

2. The employer has complied with the requirements of Sections 1771, 1811, and 1815 for any work performed by the employer’s employees on the public works project.

The payroll records required pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1776 shall be certified and shall be available for inspection by the Owner and its authorized representatives, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial Relations and shall otherwise be available for inspection in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1776.

D. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1777.5, the Consultant, on behalf of the Consultant and any subcontractors engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A, shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with California Labor Code Section 1777.5 governing employment and payment of apprentices on public works contracts.

E. In case it becomes necessary for the Consultant or any subcontractor engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A to employ for the services described in Exhibit A any City Council/RSA Agenda 265 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Consulting Services Agreement between
City of Union City and Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
person in a trade or occupation (except executive, supervisory, administrative, clerical, or other non manual workers as such) for which no minimum wage rate has been determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, the Contractor shall pay the minimum rate of wages specified therein for the classification which most nearly corresponds to services described in Exhibit A to be performed by that person. The minimum rate thus furnished shall be applicable as a minimum for such trade or occupation from the time of the initial employment of the person affected and during the continuance of such employment.

DIR REGISTRATION
Consultant shall be currently registered with the Department of Industrial Relations and qualified to perform public work consistent with Labor Code section 1725.5, except in limited circumstances as set forth in Labor Code section 1771.1. No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1725.5. Consultant agrees, in accordance with Section 1771.4 of the California Labor Code, that if the work under this Agreement qualifies as public work, it is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

City Council/RSA Agenda 266 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Fwd: Public comment tonight meeting 5e
KENDAHYL WALLACE <[email protected]>
Tue 1/11/2022 7:22 AM
To: Anna M. Brown <[email protected]>
WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From: KENDAHYL WALLACE <[email protected]>
Date: January 11, 2022 at 7:11:37 AM PST
To: [email protected]
Subject: Public comment tonight meeting 5e
Good morning Ana
To be read or add into public comment section
Happy New Years to all the city staff and city council. I just want share my support for 5e on tonight city council Agenda.I want see Quarry lakes Project move forward.Also I would like the city council to consider a designated Identified downtown area around Marketplace plaza and Marina food shopping centers. I am Looking forward to seeing complete street improvements along Decoto and Alvarado Niles road .In additional also would like to see the Economic development department be more Aggressive and fill those store front properties along 11 street(Station district) and Sugar mill development Alvarado District)
Thank you
Kendahyl
Sent from my iPhone
City Council/RSA Agenda 267 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Agenda Item
DATE: 1/11/2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOAN MALLOY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED
$160,000 WITH TBWBH PROPS AND MEASURES, INCLUDING PUBLIC

POLLING WITH GODBE RESEARCH, TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES REGARDING THE CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE TAX

MEASURES
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement in an amount not-to-exceed $160,000 with TBWBH Props and Measures, including public polling with Godbe Research, to provide professional services regarding the consideration of future tax measures that require voter approval. The purpose of considering tax measures would be to maintain core City services, including police; fire; maintenance of City facilities; parks and roads; and provide recreational and social service programs for our youth, families and seniors.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
GoalA. Financial Stability and Sustainability
Strategy: Study and prepare for placement of a revenue measure for November 2022 election that addresses the expiration of the half-cent sales tax; or, prepare for a $6 million in service cuts.

Strategy: Study the benefits and opportunities to update the City's business license tax for voter consideration.

Goal C. Economic, Community Development and Public Safety Strategy:Analyze the feasibility of transforming warehouses to attract high-value industrialand commercial uses for the benefit of community.

BACKGROUND
City Council/RSA Agenda 268 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Union City adopted a five-year strategic plan in September 2019 to establish goals and strategies to guide the City Council's agenda. The primary goal of the plan is to “foster fiscal health through long-term planning, cost control, heightened efficiency, increased revenue and cost recovery." The City has taken several steps to improve its fiscal health over the past three years, including legalizing and taxing cannabis sales and reducing contract costs with Alameda County Fire Department. Additionally, a majority of Union City voters passed the utility user tax (UUT) after the extension of the public safety parcel tax failed to receive 2/3 voter support. Without the passage of the UUT, the general fund would have incurred over $4.2 million dollars in losses to public safety (police and fire) and the youth violence prevention programs.

Union City voters adopted a 1/2 cent sales tax in 2010 (Measure AA) and renewed the measure in 2014 (Measure JJ) for 10 years that has helped the City achieve fiscal stability. The sales tax measure will expire April 2025 unless it is extended by voters at a general election in 2022 or 2024. Union City has relied upon voter approved measures to provide fundamental services in the community, including, but not limited to, public safety, street and park maintenance, senior services, and youth violence prevention programs. With the expiration of the 1/2 cent tax on the horizon, staff have regularly shared with the Council that the general fund will lose more than $6 million in revenues. In acknowledgement of this future funding gap, as part of the strategic plan the Council adopted a strategy to study and prepare for placement of a revenue measure for November 2022 election that addresses the expiration of the half-cent sales tax; or, prepare for a $6 million in service cuts. While the 1/2 cent sales tax will not expire until early 2025, to delay consideration of a ballot measure until 2024 will leave the Council with only one opportunity to engage the voters on the possible extension of the tax measure and create a great deal of fiscal uncertainty for employees.

On October 26, 2021, the Council received a briefing from the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT) and strategy recommendations to support the transformation of warehouses to higher-end uses.

Several strategies were considered, among which, was a strategy to update the business license tax structure and authorize staff to engage consultants to address polling and strategies to determine timing of future ballot initiatives. The purpose of this strategy is to shift the business license tax burden from small businesses to large, warehouse uses that often do not provide much tax revenue to the general fund or many jobs in the community. The Council unanimously supported this strategy to explore increasing the business license tax.

Similar to the 1/2 cent sales tax extension, increasing the business license tax would need to be brought before the voters at a general election.

In consideration of planning for the long-term fiscal health of the community, staff has engaged TBWBH Props and Measures and Godbe Research to assist the City in evaluation of possible ballot measures for the 2022 election.

DISCUSSION
Staff has engaged Charles Heath, TBWBH Props and Measures and Brian Godbe, Godbe Research to prepare a comprehensive proposal that includes feasibility assessment and polling of up to two ballot measures, including the extension of the ½ cent sales tax and the business license tax increase; ballot measure development; and public information. The proposaland timeline are attached to the resolution.

This agreement is coming before the City Council because there are several important milestones in the next several months, including:

February - Study session on the possible fiscal impacts of increasing business license tax; February/March - Final direction and ballot language on the business license tax; March 2022- Public polling for the extension of the ½ cent sales tax and the business license tax; City Council/RSA Agenda 269 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
April 2022 - Polling results reported to Council; Council provides direction on ballot measures; May/June 2022 – Public information and outreach and drafting of election resolutions, ordinances and final ballot question;
July/August 2022 – Councilacts to place possibly measures on ballot; August 12, 2022 – Deadline for Registrar of Voters to receive measure for November 2022 ballot. See Attachment 1 for a detailed timeline.

The proposal includes both the work of TBWBH Props and Measures and Godbe Research. Both consultants have extensive experience working in Union City and have provided professional services on past ballot measures and the 2021 citywide community survey. See Attachment 2 for the proposed scope of service.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for this Consultant Services Agreement were included in the FY 2021-2022 Adopted Budget in Account Number 1110-1201-11041-54218 (Community Relations-Community Promotions) in anticipation of a need to communicate with residents about the future expiration of the 1/2 cent sales tax. No funds were budgeted for the consideration of a business license tax increase. However, there are sufficient salary savings available in the City Manager’s Office – Community Relations Division budget to cover the proportionalcost of analyzing the possible proposal to increase the business license tax. The not-to-exceed cost of the TBWBH Props and Measures contract is $160,000 and includes the scope of services for both TBWBH Props and Measures and Godbe Research.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement in an amount not-to-exceed $160,000 with TBWBH Props and Measures, including public polling with Godbe Research, to provide professional services regarding the consideration of future tax measures.

Prepared by:

Joan Malloy, City Manager
Submitted by:

Joan Malloy, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Attachment 1: Timeline for Preparation of Ballot Measures and Public Education
Attachment
Resolution:Authorizing Execution of TBWBHServices Agreement Resolution Exhibit A: TBWBHGodbe Research Scope of Service Exhibit City Council/RSA Agenda 270 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
PROPS
& MEASURES STRATEGY & COMMUNICATIONS • 415.291.1894 • [email protected] • WWW.PROPSANDMEASURES.COM • SAN FRANCISCO · LOS ANGELES PROPS & MEASURES STRATEGY & COMMUNICATIONS • 415.291.1894 • [email protected] • WWW.PROPSANDMEASURES.COM • SAN FRANCISCO · LOS ANGELES To: City of Union City
From: Charles Heath and Lucy Martikyan, TBWBH Props & Measures Date: December 20, 2021
Re: Timeline for November 2022 Revenue Measure Election January – February 2022
• Work with HdL and city staff to refine business license tax scenarios for presentation to Council
• February 8: Council study session to review business license tax scenarios and receive initial direction for polling
• Establish Council Subcommittee to advise staff and consultants on revenue measure planning • Subcommittee, consultants and staff work with Godbe Research to draft split sample poll to look at sales tax renewal and business license tax increase March – April 2022
• March 8: Council provides final direction on business license tax options for polling • Subcommittee, consultants and staff work with Godbe Research to finalize poll • March 14: Polling begins
• Godbe Research presents poll results and key findings to Subcommittee and staff • Godbe Research presents poll results and recommendations to full Council and Council provides direction or revenue measure(s) to prepare for ballot May – June 2022
• TBWBH crafts informational messaging based on poll results including:
o Talking points
o FAQs
o Fact sheet/flyer
o Social media and web content
o PPT presentation
• Develop internal stakeholder outreach target list including employee associations, commissions and others for informational outreach presentations • Develop external stakeholder outreach target list of key opinion leaders and community stakeholders for informational outreach presentations
• June 7: Statewide Primary Election
• TBWBH writes, designs and mails first informational mailer with tear-off survey and link to online prioritization survey (following June 2022 Primary Election) • TBWBH develops and deploys coordinated social media and digital advertising to drive traffic to online prioritization survey
• Conduct outreach to key opinion leaders and community stakeholders • Work with City Attorney to draft election resolution, ordinance, ballot question and any other required documents
July – August 2022
• TBWBH writes, designs and mails second informational mailer focused on survey feedback and proposed measure(s)
City Council/RSA Agenda 271 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
PROPS
& MEASURES STRATEGY & COMMUNICATIONS • 415.291.1894 • [email protected] • WWW.PROPSANDMEASURES.COM • SAN FRANCISCO · LOS ANGELES PROPS & MEASURES STRATEGY & COMMUNICATIONS • 415.291.1894 • [email protected] • WWW.PROPSANDMEASURES.COM • SAN FRANCISCO · LOS ANGELES • Finalize election resolution, ordinance, ballot question and other required documents based on tracking survey
• July 12 City Council Meeting: First reading of election resolution(s) and revenue measure ordinance(s)
• July 26 City Council Meeting: Second reading and adoption of election resolution(s) and revenue measure ordinance(s)
• TBWBH writes, designs and mails third informational mailer focused on Council action to place measure(s) on ballot
• August 12 (88 Days Prior to Election Day): Deadline for City Clerk to coordinate with County Registrar of Voters to finalize process for qualifying for the ballot • City Attorney prepares Official Impartial Analysis
• TBWBH prepares draft Official Argument in Favor of measure and works with Union City leaders to identify five official signers of argument
• (If needed) TBWBH prepares draft Rebuttal to the Argument Against measure and works with Union City leaders to identify five official signers of rebuttal September – November 2022
• TBWBH develops and sends fourth citywide informational mailer notifying all registered voters about revenue measure(s) on the November 2022 ballot, providing key dates and voting information
• TBWBH develops and deploys coordinated social media and digital advertising to drive traffic to online informational content about the measure and voting instructions • Conduct post-placement outreach to key opinion leaders and community stakeholders • TBWBH develops and sends fifth citywide informational mailer providing election and voting information
• Online informational content remains available through Election Day • TBWBH provides guidelines to city staff for public communication during election period • Transition to privately funded independent advocacy campaign City Council/RSA Agenda 272 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TOEXCEED $160,000 WITH TBWBH PROPS AND MEASURES, INCLUDING PUBLIC POLLING

WITH GODBE RESEARCH, TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REGARDING THE

CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE TAX MEASURES
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a five-year strategic plan in September 2019 that included a policy to “foster fiscal health through long-term planning, cost control, heightened efficiency, increased revenue and cost recovery;” and
WHEREAS, the City has taken several steps to improve its fiscal health over the past three years, including legalizing and taxing cannabis sales and reducing contract costs with Alameda County Fire Department; and
WHEREAS, a majority of Union City voters passed the utility user tax (UUT) after the extension of the public safety parcel tax failed to receive 2/3 voter support; and WHEREAS, without the passage of the UUT, the general fund would have incurred over $4.2 million dollars in losses to public safety (police and fire) and the youth violence prevention programs; and
WHEREAS, Union City voters adopted a 1/2 cent sales tax in 2010 (Measure AA) and renewed the measure in 2014 (Measure JJ) for 10 years that has helped the City achieve fiscal stability; and
WHEREAS, the sales tax measure will expire April 2025, unless it is extended by voters at a general election in 2022 or 2024; and
WHEREAS, Union City has relied upon voter approved measures to provide fundamental services in the community, including, but not limited to, public safety, street and park maintenance, senior services, and youth violence prevention programs; and WHEREAS, with the expiration of the 1/2 cent tax on the horizon, staff have regularly shared with the Council the that the general fund will lose more than $6 million in general fund revenues that are key to funding City services; and WHEREAS, the Council adopted a strategy to study and prepare for placement of a revenue measure for November 2022 election that addresses the expiration of the half-cent sales tax; and
City Council/RSA Agenda 273 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
WHEREAS, the City Council received a briefing from the Economic Development Advisory Team (EDAT) and strategy recommendations to support the transformation of warehouses to higher-end uses; and
WHEREAS, among the strategies considered was to update the business license tax structure and authorize staff to engage consultants to address polling and strategies to determine timing of future ballot initiatives; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of planning for the long-term fiscal health of the community, staff has engaged TBWBH Props and Measures and Godbe Research to assist the City in evaluation of possible ballot measures for the 2022 election; and WHEREAS, Charles Heath, TBWBH Props and Measures and Brian Godbe, Godbe Research prepared a comprehensive proposal that includes feasibility assessment and polling of up to two ballot measures, including the extension of the ½ cent sales tax and the business license tax increase, ballot measure development, and public information at a cost not to exceed $160,000 attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, funds for this Consultant Services Agreement were included in the FY 2021-2022 Adopted Budget in Account Number 1110-1201-11041-54218 (Community Relations-Community Promotions) though no funds were budgeted for the consideration of a business license tax increase; and
WHEREAS, there are sufficient salary savings available in the City Manager’s Office – Community Relations Division budget to cover the proportional cost of analyzing the possible proposal to increase the business license tax.

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City authorizes the City Attorney to prepare a Contract Services Agreement with TBWBH Props and Measures, including a scope of services for Godbe Research, in an amount not to exceed $160,000, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

City Council/RSA Agenda 274 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Exhibit 1: Scope of Services and Compensation Schedule

1. Engagement of TBWBH Props & Measures (TBWBH). During the term of this Agreement, Client hereby engages TBWBH to perform the following services (collectively, “Services”):
a. Feasibility Assessment. TBWBH shall perform any of the following services as needed to assess the electoral feasibility of a Revenue Measure or Revenue Measures for Client:
1) Develop potential Revenue Measure strategies to meet Client’s funding needs to be tested in polling;
2) Collaborate with Godbe Research to design, conduct and analyze an opinion survey of voters within Client’s jurisdiction to assess the electoral feasibility of one or more Revenue Measures;
3) Conduct a demographic analysis of voters within Client’s jurisdiction and how they break into key sub-groups by age, ethnicity, political party, length of residency, and other key criteria;
4) Analyze past election results in the jurisdiction and region to understand voter turnout trends and other relevant voting patterns; 5) Research other local tax proposals that may be heading to an upcoming ballot that could compete with Client’s Revenue Measure(s); and
6) Make a specific recommendation regarding type of revenue measure to pursue, optimal election date, tax rate, tax structure and other important Revenue Measure features.
b. Ballot Measure Development. TBWBH shall perform any of the following services as needed to assist Client in preparing the Revenue Measure for the ballot:
1) Recommend a final tax type, tax rate, duration and tax structure; 2) Recommend the final the list of projects, programs and services to be funded by the measure and prepare messaging that clearly articulates how these programs will benefit from additional revenue provided by the measure;
3) Recommend procedures for the taxpayer accountability protections, such as a process for an independent citizens’ oversight committee; 4) Work with legal counsel to develop a resolution or ordinance calling for the election;
5) Work with legal counsel to develop the 75-word ballot question; 6) Work with legal counsel to develop and refine the full text of the measure, ballot arguments, rebuttals and other materials that will appear in the ballot pamphlet mailed to all voters;
7) Present recommendations, documents and resolutions to Client’s administration and City Council for approval; and
City Council/RSA Agenda 275 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
8) Work with the City Clerk and County Registrar of Voters Office as needed to assist Client in completing the process of qualifying for the ballot.
c. Public Information. TBWBH shall perform any of the following services as needed to raise awareness of Client’s funding needs and the Revenue Measure proposal:
1) Develop informational fact sheets to be distributed digitally and at community functions;
2) Develop talking points, frequently asked questions and answers and provide message trainings to city staff and others;
3) Provide content related to the Revenue Measure to be added to Client’s website, used in social media posts, included in email updates and added to newsletters;
4) Prepare PowerPoint presentations for community meetings and online presentations;
5) Write, design, and produce mailings and advertising to educate, inform and engage voters;
6) Develop strategies and plans to inform and engage key internal stakeholder groups; and
7) Develop strategies and plans to inform and engage influential external groups including elected leaders, business leaders, city leaders, ethnic community leaders, faith community leaders, taxpayer groups and others.

City Council/RSA Agenda 276 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Compensation Schedule
In consideration for the Services to be rendered by TBWBH pursuant to this Agreement, Client shall pay the following fees to TBWBH:
a. Base Consulting Fee. TBWBH shall be paid a Base Consulting Fee of $6,500 per month, payable within 30 days of receipt of invoice. The Base Consulting Fee shall be calculated on a pro-rata basis for the initial and/or final month of service if less than a full calendar month. b. Reimbursement of Expenses. Client shall reimburse TBWBH for expenses incurred by TBWBH from time to time in connection with the performance of the Services described herein, which includes, but is not limited to, automobile mileage at the established IRS reimbursement rate at the time at the time of travel, parking fees, copying fees, telephone charges, postage and other out-of-pocket expenses. TBWBH shall submit a report of actual expenses, and within thirty (30) days thereafter, Client shall reimburse TBWBH in full. Expenses billed to Client shall not exceed $500 in the aggregate, per calendar month without the verbal or written approval of Client. Any verbal approval shall be confirmed in writing by either party. Client may designate in writing an individual(s) with authority to approve expenses on Client's behalf.
c. Reimbursement for Media and Research Goods and Services . All media, advertising and public opinion research goods and services shall be purchased or rented from TBWBH by Client according to the agreed upon schedule of prices, which follows this section. The schedule of prices lists the entire cost of purchasing or renting media and research goods and services from TBWBH. TBWBH shall in turn subcontract the work to third party vendors. Payment for such items shall be made in advance by Client to TBWBH, or to the third party vendor at the discretion of TBWBH.
d. Not-to-Exceed Limit. Total compensation under this agreement shall not exceed $160,000 without prior approval of Client. This not-to-exceed limit assumes up to eight (8) months of consulting fees as described in section a, up to four (4) informational mailings as described and priced below and a public opinion survey conducted by Godbe Research as described on the following page.

Estimated cost to print and mail an 11x17 informational brochure to all residential households in the City of Union City (21,474 households): $17,500 City Council/RSA Agenda 277 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
GODBE RESEARCH  1220 Howard Avenue, Suite 250  Burlingame, CA 94010  office: 650.288.3020  fax: 866.388.8510 Godbe Research / TBWBH Props & Measures /
City of Union City
Registered Voter Survey Costs
December 10, 2021:

Project Task 18-min. 20-min. 22-min. 25-min.

Listed Voter Telephone Sample $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 Email Sample Purchase $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00
Third-Party Email/Cell Phone Matching $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 CATI Programming Telephone Version $1,350.00 $1,500.00 $1,675.00 $1,875.00 Internet Version Programming/Testing $4,750.00 $5,000.00 $5,250.00 $5,500.00 Internet Version Recruitment/Hosting $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 Telephone Interviewing $8,800.00 $10,000.00 $11,200.00 $12,400.00 Data Processing $800.00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00
Research Fee $7,750.00 $7,750.00 $7,750.00 $7,750.00
Project Management $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 Miscellaneous Expenses $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
English Only Survey Total $29,400.00 $31,000.00 $32,625.00 $34,275.00 Spanish Translation and Programming $750.00 $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,500.00 Spanish Telephone Interviewing Fee $800.00 $1,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,400.00 Cost to Include Spanish $1,550.00 $2,000.00 $2,450.00 $2,900.00 Hybrid (Internet & Telephone) Survey of 500 (n=500) to 600 (n=600) Registered Voters City Council/RSA Agenda 278 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Agenda Item
DATE: 1/11/2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO, CITYATTORNEY
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THERE IS A PROCLAIMED STATE OF EMERGENCY; FINDING THAT MEETING IN PERSON

WOULD PRESENT IMMINENT RISKS TO THE HEALTH OR SAFETY OF ATTENDEES AS A RESULT OF THE STATE OF EMERGENCY; AND

AUTHORIZING REMOTE TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS OF THE
LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY FOR THE 30 DAY PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY11 PURSUANT TO AB 361
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to continue conducting City Council and all other City Council appointed Board and Commission meetings remotely due to health and safety concerns for the public and making related findings in compliance with AB 361 (2021).

On December 14, 2021, the City Council made the necessary findings pursuant to AB 361 to continue to conduct virtual meetings. AB 361 requires that the City Council revisit the need to continue conducting virtual meetings every 30 days.

Staff and the City Attorney recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution making the necessary findings pursuant to AB 361 to continue conducting virtual meetings. Absent further action of the City Council, the City's legislative bodies would need to continue in-person meetings 30 days after December 14, 2021.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This action is not related to the Strategic Plan as it is in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND
On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the City Council/RSA Agenda 279 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
State address the broader spread of COVID 19.

On March 16, 2020, the City Council adopted a Resolution ratifying the proclamation of a local state of emergency by the Director of Emergency Services due to COVID-19.

On March 17, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N29-20, which suspended certain provisions of the Brown Act in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means. Additionally, the State implemented a shelter-in-place order, requiring all non-essential personnel to work from home.

The City has established virtual meetings for all City Council and City Council appointed Board and Commission meetings. The virtual meetings have allowed the Council and advisory bodies to continue to conduct City business from remote locations while ensuring the public’s continued access to government meetings in a safe manner.

On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which among other things, rescinded certain clauses of Executive Order N-29-20 after September 30, 2021, including clauses that suspended certain provisions of the Brown Act. Thus, effective October 1, 2021, agencies would have had to transition back to public meetings held in fullcompliance with the Brown Act.

Since the Governor issued Executive Order N-08-21, the highly contagious Delta variant has emerged, causing a spike in cases throughout the state and within the Alameda County. As a result, the Alameda County Health Officer issued a Health Order requiring masks indoors in public places, regardless of vaccination status, starting December 28, 2021.

On September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361 (2021) which allows for local legislative and advisory bodies to continue to conduct meetings via teleconferencing under specified conditions and includes a requirement that the Council make specified findings. AB 361 took effect immediately.

The City Counciladopted a resolution pursuant to AB 361 on September 28, 2021 in order to allow the City’s legislative bodies to continue conducting virtual meetings after September 30, 2021. The resolution included all of the necessary findings required pursuant to AB 361. The City has continued to adopt resolutions making the necessary findings to continue operating virtually since that time.

DISCUSSION
The California Legislature approved AB 361 and the Governor signed the bill into law on September 16, 2021.

AB 361 allows local legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely after the expiration of the clauses of Executive Order N-29-20 which suspended certain Brown Act provisions. Under AB 361, the City and its legislative bodies will be allowed to continue to meet remotely when:
· The localagency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency; · State or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; · Legislative bodies declare the need to meet remotely due to present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

The City meets the requirements to continue holding meetings remotely in order to ensure the health and safety of the public:
· The Governor has declared a State of Emergency, and the City Council has ratified the proclamation of a localemergency by the Director of Emergency Services; City Council/RSA Agenda 280 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
· County Health orders require that individuals in indoor public spaces wear masks and the CDC recommends social distancing of at least six feet due to COVID-19; · The Delta variant of COVID-19 has resulted in a significant increase of COVID-19 cases within the state and throughout Alameda County;
· Meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, the legislative bodies, and staff.

Now that AB 361 has been signed into law, the City Council would need to declare every 30 days that the City’s legislative bodies must continue to meet remotely in order to ensure the health and safety of the public.

The City Council has previously acted to make continued findings pursuant to AB 361.

The proposed resolution includes the necessary findings pursuant to AB 361 to allow the City Counciland the City’s legislative bodies to continue meeting remotely.

FISCAL IMPACT
This is no fiscal impact of adopting this Resolution.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to make the necessary findings to continue conducting City Council and all other City Council appointed Board and Commission meetings remotely due to health and safety concerns for the public in compliance with AB 361 (2021).

Prepared by:

Shandyn Pierce, Associate Attorney
Submitted by:

Kristopher J. Kokotaylo, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
AB361 Resolution Resolution
City Council/RSA Agenda 281 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UNION CITY FINDING THAT THERE IS A PROCLAIMED
STATE OF EMERGENCY; FINDING THAT MEETING IN

PERSON WOULD PRESENT IMMINENT RISKS TO THE

HEALTH OR SAFETY OF ATTENDEES AS A RESULT OF
THE STATE OF EMERGENCY; AND AUTHORIZING

REMOTE TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS OF THE

LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY FOR
THE 30 DAY PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 11 PURSUANT
TO AB 361
WHEREAS, all meetings of the City of Union City’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the State prepare for a broader spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”); and
WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the City Council adopted a Resolution ratifying the proclamation of a local emergency by the Director of Emergency Services due to COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means; and
WHEREAS, as a result of Executive Order N-29-20, staff set up virtual meetings for all City Council meetings and meetings of all legislative bodies within the City; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which, effective September 30, 2021, ends the provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 that allows local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361 (2021) which allows for local legislative bodies and advisory bodies to continue to conduct meetings via teleconferencing under specified conditions and includes a requirement that the City Council make specified findings. AB 361 (2021) took effect immediately; and WHEREAS, AB 361 (2021) requires that the Governor declare a State of Emergency pursuant to Government Code section 8625; and
WHEREAS, AB 361 (2021) further requires that state or local officials have imposed or City Council/RSA Agenda 282 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, requires that the legislative body determines that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and
WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City and Governor Newsom has declared a State of Emergency due to COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, since issuing Executive Order N-08-21, the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19 has emerged, causing an increase in COVID-19 cases throughout the State and Alameda County; and
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2021, in response to the Delta variant of COVID-19, the Alameda County Health Officer issued an order for nearly all individuals to wear masks when inside public spaces; and
WHEREAS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) continues to recommend physical distancing of at least 6 feet from others outside of the household; and WHEREAS, because of the rise in cases due to the Delta and Omicron variants of COVID19, the City is concerned about the health and safety of all individuals who intend to attend City Council and meetings of the City’s other legislative bodies; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2021 the City Council found that the presence of COVID-19 and the increase of cases due to the Delta variant would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, including the legislative bodies and staff, should the City’s legislative bodies hold in person meetings; and
WHEREAS, since the Alameda County Health Officer’s August order the highly contagious Omicron variant has emerged, and has resulted in the greatest nationwide infection rate since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic; and
WHEREAS, on December 28, 2021, in response to the continued presence and rise of COVID-19 cases, the Alameda County Health Officer issued an order requiring that all persons, regardless of vaccination status, wear face masks in all indoor public settings, venues, gatherings, and workplaces; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the imminent risks of the City’s legislative bodies holding in person meetings to the health or safety of attendees continues to exist; and
WHEREAS, the City shall ensure that it’s meetings comply with the provisions required by AB 361 (2021) for holding teleconferenced meetings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Union City as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and incorporated into this Resolution.

City Council/RSA Agenda 283 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

2. In compliance with AB 361 (2021), and in order to continue to conduct teleconference meetings without complying with the usual teleconference meeting requirements of the Brown Act, the City Council makes the following continued findings:
a) The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and
b) The state of emergency, as declared by the Governor and City Council, continues to directly impact the ability of the City Council and the City’s legislative bodies, as well as staff and members of the public, from meeting safely in person; and c) The CDC continues to recommend physical distancing of at least six feet due to COVID-19 and as a result of the presence of COVID-19 and the increase of cases due to the Delta and Omicron variants, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, the legislative bodies and staff.

3. City Council and City’s legislative bodies may continue to meet remotely in compliance with AB 361, in order to better ensure the health and safety of the public.

4. The City Council will revisit the need to conduct meetings remotely within 30 days of the adoption of this resolution.

City Council/RSA Agenda 284 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Agenda Item
DATE: 1/11/2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO, CITYATTORNEY
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UNION CITY CONFIRMING THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19
The City Council ratified a proclamation of local emergency on March 16, 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The City Council confirmed the continued existence of the local emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with state law on May 12, 2020, June 23, 2020, August 11, 2020, September 22, 2020, November 10, 2020, December 22, 2021, February 9, 2021, March 23, 2021, May 11, 2021, June 22, 2021, August 10, 2021, September 28, 2021, and November 23, 2021. City staff and the City Attorney recommend that the City Councilconfirm the continued existence of the localemergency.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This action does not relate to the Strategic Plan as it is in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND
On March 16, 2020, the City Manager, acting as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed a local emergency pursuant to California Government Code Section 8630 and Union City Municipal Code Chapter

2.28. The emergency declaration was based on conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the City as a consequence of the global spread of novel coronavirus 2019 ("COVID-19"), including confirmed cases in Alameda County. On that same day, the City Council adopted a resolution ratifying the Proclamation of Local Emergency issued by the Director of Emergency Services.

On May 12, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution confirming the continued existence of the local emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently, on June 23, 2020, August 11, 2020, September 22, 2020, November 10, 2020, December 22, 2020, February 9, 2021, March 23, 2021, May 11, 2021, June 22, 2021, August 10, 2021, September 28, 2021, and November 23, 2021 the City Council adopted resolutions confirming the continued existence of the localemergency.

City Council/RSA Agenda 285 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

DISCUSSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 8630, the City Council must review and confirm the continued existence of a local emergency at least once every sixty (60) days. This Resolution comes to the City Council prior to the expiration of sixty (60) days from the previous confirmation of local emergency to ensure there is no interruption in the declaration of the continued localemergency.

The conditions that prompted the original declaration of a localemergency continue to exist and health officials are still learning more information regarding the nature of COVID-19 and how it is transmitted. Community transmission of COVID-19 continues to occur, and the number of cases within Alameda County has continued to rise. There are now 135,025 cases within the County, and 1,546 deaths (as of January 4, 2022).

The spread of COVID-19 continues as a result of the highly contagious Delta and Omicron variants of the virus. While the Alameda County Health Officer shelter in place order requiring that all residents shelter at home has been rescinded, public health and safety concerns for persons and property within the City as a consequence of the global spread of COVID-19 continue to exist.

Declaring a state of emergency provides local governments with the power necessary to coordinate and implement plans aimed at protecting the community and property during a disaster. For example, a declaration of emergency is often necessary to secure mutual disaster aid from local, state and federal agencies. A declaration of emergency also permits the Director of Emergency Services to promulgate orders and regulations necessary for the protection of life and property, such as imposing a curfew and ordering use of facilities for governmental purposes. Additionally, declaring a state of emergency ensures that the local government and its officials and employees are immune from liability when exercising their official duties during an emergency.

If adopted, the declaration of emergency willcontinue to remain in place until the emergency conditions have ended. However, the City Council will be required to continue to review the declaration at least every 60 days.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact for adopting the resolution declaring that a local emergency continues to exist.

However, the City will consider all options available to seek reimbursement for expenses through the appropriate authorities.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Counciladopt a resolution confirming the continued existence of a local emergency due to COVID-19.

Prepared by:

Shandyn H. Pierce, Associate Attorney
Submitted by:

Kristopher J. Kokotaylo, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:

City Council/RSA Agenda 286 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Description Type
Emergency COVIDResolution January 2022 Resolution
City Council/RSA Agenda 287 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
1 CITY OF UNION CITY

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

CONFIRMING THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OFA LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8630 and Union City Municipal Code Section

2.28.060 authorize the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim a local emergency when conditions of disaster or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a city exist if the City Council is not in session and provides that the City Council shall ratify the proclamation within seven days thereafter; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 8630 and Union City Municipal Code Section 2.28.060, the Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency caused by the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), a respiratory disease first identified in China that may result in serious illness or death that is easily transmissible from person to person, on March 16, 2020; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the City Council ratified and confirmed the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency issued by the Director of Emergency Services; and
WHEREAS, on May 12, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5595-20 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5618-20 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5642-20 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5656- 20 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5684- 20 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5700- 20 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5710-21 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5731-21 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and City Council/RSA Agenda 288 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
2 WHEREAS, on May 11, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5752- 21 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5785- 21 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on August 10, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5817- 21 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5829- 21 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5857- 21 confirming the continued existence of the local emergency; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 8630 the City Council must periodically review the need for continuing the local emergency; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 8630, the City Council must review the need for continuing the local emergency at least every sixty (60) days; and WHEREAS, the conditions that prompted the original declaration of a local emergency continue to exist; and
WHEREAS, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5572-20, adopted by the City Council on March 16, 2020, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5595-20 adopted by the City Council on May 12, 2020, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5618-20 adopted by the City Council on June 23, 2020, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5642-20 adopted by the City Council on August 11, 2020, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5656-20 adopted by the City Council on September 22, 2020, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5684-20 adopted by the City Council on November 10, 2020, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5700-20 adopted by the City Council on December 22, 2020, the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5710-21 adopted by the City Council on February 9, 2021, and the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5731-21 adopted by the City Council on March 23, 2021, and the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5752- 21 adopted by the City Council on May 11 2021, and the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5785-21 adopted by the City Council on June 22, 2021, and the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5817-21 adopted by the City Council on August 10, 2021, and the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5829-21 adopted by the City Council on September 28, 2021, and the recitals contained in Resolution No. 5857-21 adopted by the City Council on November 23, 2021 are incorporated into this Resolution as if stated herein; and WHEREAS, community transmission of COVID-19 has continued to occur and health officials are still learning more information regarding the nature of COVID-19 and how it is City Council/RSA Agenda 289 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
3 transmitted; and
WHEREAS, the number of cases within Alameda County has continued to rise, and as of January 4, 2022 there are now over 135,025 confirmed cases of COVID-19 within the County, and 1,546 deaths; and
WHEREAS, since the initial declaration of a local emergency on March 16, 2020 the highly contagious Delta and Omicron variants have emerged and resulted in continued COVID19 infections; and WHEREAS, the public health and safety concerns for persons and property within the City as a consequence of the global spread of COVID-19 continue to exist; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and welfare of Union City residents, businesses, visitors, and staff is of utmost importance to the City and additional future measures may be needed to protect the community; and
WHEREAS, the City may require additional assistance in the future, and a formal declaration of emergency allows the City to access resources in a timely manner in a timely fashion; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of the City related to COVID-19 pandemic continue in existence; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that extraordinary measures are required to protect the public health, safety, and of persons and property within the City that are or are likely to be beyond the control or capability of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to confirm the continued existence of a local emergency within Union City due to COVID-19.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Union City hereby declares as follows:

1. The local emergency declared by Resolution No. 5572-20 due to the COVID-19 pandemic continues to exist within the City of Union City.

2. During the existence of the declared local emergency, the powers, functions, and duties of the City Manager, acting as Director of Emergency Services, and the emergency organization of this City shall be those prescribed by State law and by ordinances and resolutions of the City of Union City.

3. The declaration of local emergency shall remain in effect until such time that the City Council determines that the emergency conditions have been abated.

City Council/RSA Agenda 290 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
4 4. City staff is directed to place an item on the agenda for review at least every sixty (60) days from the effective date of this Resolution to determine the need for continuing the local emergency pursuant to Government Code Section 8630.

City Council/RSA Agenda 291 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Agenda Item
DATE: 1/11/2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOAN MALLOY, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL REPORT AND RECEIVE COUNCIL DIRECTION

REGARDING TOBACCO RETAIL LICENSE UPDATE
This is an informational report and no formal action is required by the City Council; however, staff is requesting direction on next steps regarding updates to the Tobacco Retail License Ordinance. Staff recommends proceeding with an update to the Ordinance after the November 2022 elections results are available.

Other alternative options for the Council to consider include:
1) Do not proceed with an update to the Tobacco Retail License Ordinance; or 2) Proceed now with an update to the Tobacco Retail License Ordinance.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
There is no strategic plan alignment associated with this agenda item.

BACKGROUND
The City of Union City has an established Tobacco Retail License Ordinance, which has been in place since 2010 (Attachment A – Ordinance 741-10) and was updated in 2013 (Attachment B – Ordinance 791-13).

There are currently 39 active tobacco retail license holders within Union City. The Tobacco Retail License Ordinance also establishes a minimum package size for cigars of at least five (except cigars costing at least $5 can be sold individually), prohibits and restricts the non-sale distribution of tobacco products and distribution of tobacco product coupons. The City’s Zoning Ordinance also provides that tobacco retailers must be at least 1,000 feet from parks, playgrounds, public libraries, recreation centers, religious institutions, and school or youth-oriented establishments.

The City’s Youth Commission was presented information by Breathe California’s UCAN-ACT Initiative in March 2020 and the Youth Commission formed the Tackle Tobacco Workgroup (TTW) in December 2020.

City Council/RSA Agenda 292 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
The TTW researched and developed 4 recommendations and presented these recommendations at the September 14, 2021 regular City Council meeting. Members of the TTW/Youth Commission presented a report recommending four action items:
1) banning flavored tobacco products
2) ending the sale of electronic smoking devices
3) ending the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies
4) increasing the minimum price/and or pack size requirement for tobacco products Upon receipt of the report from the Youth Commission, the City Council directed staff to research tobacco retail license regulations throughout Alameda County. City staff have been researching tobacco retail license regulations and trends at the federal, State and local level. City staff have been in contact with Breathe California, the Alameda County Department of Public Health and the American Heart Association. These organizations fully support a ban on all flavored tobacco products (including menthol) be included in an update to the City’s tobacco retail license ordinance.

Tobacco use and COVID-19 linkages are currently being researched. The Alameda County Tobacco Control Program has highlighted data that supports succession of tobacco decrease the effects of severe disease progression and risk of mortality (Attachment C). Those who smoke are more likely to test positive for COVID-19. With reduced lung capacity and compromised respiratory systems, people who smoke have an increased risk of serious illness including COVID-19.

DISCUSSION
There is clear evidence that tobacco products are addictive and pose serious health concerns for consumers of such products. Given the public health crisis surrounding flavored tobacco products, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 793 into law in August 2020. SB 793 prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, statewide effective January 1, 2021. However, a referendum that qualified for the November 2022 general election suspended the implementation of the statewide flavored tobacco law until it is approved or rejected by voters statewide.

On April 28, 2021, Governor Newsom issued a statement urging the Federal government to ban menthol cigarettes. One day later, on April 29, 2021 the US Drug and Food Administration (FDA) issued a statement that it is working toward issuing proposed product standards within the next year to ban the sale of menthol tobacco products. If implemented, the FDA’s enforcement of any ban on menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars will address manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, importers, and retailers (by taking these products out of the market).

Local jurisdictions have the power to enact stronger laws than the state and the suspension of SB-793 does not prohibit local jurisdictions from moving forward with implementing laws ending the sale of flavored tobacco.

Alameda County Public Health provided research on all 14 incorporated jurisdictions and unincorporated areas within Almeda County. The majority (80%) of all jurisdictions within Alameda County have established tobacco retail license ordinances including Union City (except for Newark, Piedmont and Emeryville). In addition, to having established tobacco retail license ordinances, over 73% of local jurisdictions in Alameda County have a complete sales ban on flavored tobacco, with the vast majority categorizing “menthol” as a flavor (Attachment D).

A. Ban on Flavored Tobacco Sales (including menthol)
“Flavored Tobacco Product” means any tobacco product that imparts a characterizing flavor.

City Council/RSA Agenda 293 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
B. Prohibited Electronic Smoking Device Sales (cannabis electronic smoking devises are permitted) “Electronic Smoking Devises” include electronic cigarette, electronic cigar, electronic pipe and electronic hookah.

C. Density (limits an overconcentration of tobacco retailers) and Youth-Sensitive Areas (prohibits tobacco sales within 1,000 feet of youth populated areas; prohibits tobacco sales within 500 feet of existing tobacco retailers; limits total number of tobacco retail licenses to 1 per 2,500 residents) D. Little Cigar Pack Size (20 per pack)
“Little Cigar” means any roll of tobacco other than a Cigarette wrapped entirely or in part in tobacco or any substance containing tobacco and weighing no more than three pounds per thousand. Little cigar includes, but is not limited to, tobacco products known or labeled as smallcigar, little cigar, or cigarillo. Larger pack size numbers are associated with higher costs to tobacco consumers, which in turn reduces the purchase of little cigars.

E. Minimum Price ($8 cigarette's, little cigars, premium cigars) “Cigar” means any roll of tobacco other than a cigarette wrapped in paper entirely or in part in tobacco or any substance containing tobacco and weighing more than three pounds per thousand.

F. Discounts and Coupons – Prohibited
“Coupon” means any voucher, rebate, card, paper, note, form, statement, ticket, image, or other issue, whether in paper, digital, or other form, used for commercial purposes to obtain an article, product, service, or accommodation without charge or at a discounted price.

G. Tobacco-Free Pharmacies (a tobacco-free pharmacy sales policy decreases the availability of tobacco products by reducing the number of tobacco retailers)
Union City does not have a ban on flavored tobacco sales; however, the City does provide protections through its current Tobacco Retail License Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. Key highlights include:

A. Density and Youth-Sensitive Areas (bans sale of tobacco within 1,000 feet of parks, playgrounds, libraries, recreation centers, religious institutions and youth-oriented establishments) B. Little Cigar Pack Size (minimum pack size of 5)
C. Minimum Price (a single premium cigar shallcost at least $5) D. Limits Discounts and Coupons (which increases the cost of low-cost tobacco products) All local jurisdictions within Alameda County are not in total alignment regarding tobacco retail licenses.

However, advocating on policy measures that ban flavored tobacco sales is of the upmost priority to Alameda County Public Health and the American Heart Association. Due to tobacco companies’ marketing efforts, youth, communities of color, low-income populations, and members of LGBTQ communities are significantly more likely to use menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco products. These groups disproportionately bear the burden of tobacco-related harm. A comprehensive prohibition on the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including mentholcigarettes, provides a significant public health and health equity benefit.

Potential updates to the Tobacco Retail License Ordinance that the Council may wish to consider include:

A. Ban on Flavored Tobacco Sales (including menthol)
B. Prohibit Electronic Smoking Device Sales (cannabis electronic smoking devises are permitted) C. Density and Youth-Sensitive Areas (in addition to prohibiting tobacco sales within 1,000 feet of youth populated areas; prohibit tobacco sales within 500 feet of existing tobacco retailers; limit the total number of tobacco retail licenses to 1 per 2,500 residents) D. Increase the Little Cigar Pack Size (from 5 to 20)
E. Increase Minimum Price (from $5 to $8 cigarettes, little cigars, premium cigars) The City could establish additional minimum price for tobacco products. For example, unincorporated Alameda County establishes a minimum price of $8 per package of twenty (20) cigarettes, $8 per package of little cigars, and $8 per cigar.

City Council/RSA Agenda 294 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
F. Implement Tobacco-Free Pharmacies - Tobacco sales in pharmacies send mixed messages to customers about tobacco’s health risks. An amended ordinance can make pharmacies ineligible to receive or renew a tobacco retailer license.

FISCAL IMPACT
This is an informational report, with no associated fiscal impact to the General Fund. If the Council directs staff to proceed with an ordinance update, there will be legalcosts in preparing the ordinance.

RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational report, and no formal action is required by the City Council; however, staff is requesting direction on next steps regarding updates to the Tobacco Retail License Ordinance.

Staff recommends proceeding with an update to the Ordinance after the November 2022 elections results are available. Some of the concerns raised by the Youth Commission and the TTW may be addressed through statewide legislation.

Prepared by:

Sharon Petrehn, Management Analyst II
Submitted by:

Sharon Petrehn, Management Analyst II
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Attachment A - UCOrd. 741-10 Ordinance
Attachment B- UCOrd. 791-13 Ordinance
Attachment C- COVID-19 and Smoking Handout Attachment
Attachment D- Flavored Tobacco Map Attachment
Attachment E-Alameda County Ordinance 2020-4 Ordinance
Desk Item- Breate CA Letter Attachment
Power Point Attachment
City Council/RSA Agenda 295 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 296 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 297 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 298 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 299 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 300 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 301 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 302 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 303 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 304 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 305 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 306 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 307 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 308 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 309 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 310 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 311 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 312 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 313 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 314 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 315 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 316 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 317 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 318 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 319 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 320 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 321 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 322 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 323 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 324 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 325 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 326 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 327 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 328 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 329 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 330 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 331 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 332 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 333 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 334 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 335 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 336 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 337 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 338 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 339 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 340 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 341 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 342 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 343 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 344 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 345 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 346 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Leopold, P. L., O'Mahony, M. J., Lian, X. J., Tilley, A. E., Harvey, B. G., & Crystal, R. G. (2009). Smoking is associated with shortened airway cilia. PloS one, 4(12).

Clapp, P. W., Lavrich, K. S., van Heusden, C. A., Lazarowski, E. R., Carson, J. L., & Jaspers, I. (2019). Cinnamaldehyde in flavored e-cigarette liquids temporarily suppresses bronchial epithelial cell ciliary motility by dysregulation of mitochondrial function. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology237, 316(3), L470-L486.

Zhou, P., Yang, X.L., Wang, X. G., Hu, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., ... & Chen, H. D. (2020). A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature, 579(7798), 270-273.

Leung, J. M., Yang, C. X., Tam, A., Shaipanich, T., Hackett, T. L., Singhera, G. K., ... & Sin, D. D. (2020). ACE-2 expression in the small airway epithelia of smokers and COPD patients: implications for COVID-19. European Respiratory Journal.

Cai, G. Tobacco-Use Disparity in Gene Expression of ACE2, the Receptor of 2019-nCov. Preprints 2020, 2020020051 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202002.0051.v1).

Han, L., Ran, J., Mak, Y. W., Suen, L. K. P., Lee, P. H., Peiris, J. S. M., & Yang, L. (2019). Smoking and influenza-associated morbidity and mortality: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Epidemiology, 30(3), 405-417.

World Health Organisation. (2020c) Basic protective measures against the new coronavirus. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public. Accessed May 11, 2020.

Cecere, L. M., Williams, E. C., Sun, H., Bryson, C. L., Clark, B. J., Bradley, K. A., & Au, D. H. (2012). Smoking cessation and the risk of hospitalization for pneumonia. Respiratory medicine, 106(7), 1055-1062.

Surveillances, V. (2020). The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19)—China, 2020. China CDC Weekly, 2(8), 113-122.

World Health Organization. Cmoking and COVID-10: Scientific Brief. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/smoking-and-covid-19 on June 1, 2020.

Lee, J. G., Sun, D. L., Schleicher, N. M., Ribisl, K. M., Luke, D. A., & Henriksen, L. (2017). Inequalities in tobacco outlet density by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status, 2012, USA: results from the ASPiRE Study. J Epidemiol Community Health, 71(5), 487-492. "Alameda County COVID-19 Dashboard". Retrieved from ac-hcsa.maps.arcgis.com. Accessed May 4, 2020.

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

REFERENCES

RESOURCES
California Smokers' Helpline: 1-800-NO-BUTTS or nobutts.org/covid Alameda County Tobacco Control Program: [email protected]
2 1

ALAMEDA COUNTY TOBACCO CONTROL

PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS

THOSE WHO SMOKE ARE MORE LIKELY
TO TEST POSITIVE FOR COVID-19
THE INTERSECTION OF COVID-19 AND

TOBACCO WORSENS HEALTH &

SOCIAL INEQUITIES
TOBACCO USE AND COVID-19
The Alameda County Tobacco Control Program aims to provide up-to-date resources on the linkages between tobacco use (including combustible cigarettes and vaping devices) and COVID-19. Although there currently is no conclusive scientific evidence for the direct link between tobacco and COVID-19, there is enough data to support cessation efforts to decrease the effects of severe disease progression and risk of mortality. As such, Alameda County stakeholders and allies should continue to work towards effective policy solutions to reduce tobacco access, availability and smoke exposure.

While information is rapidly evolving on this topic, we recommend community members and allies advocate for tobacco control policies including comprehensive tobacco retail licensing and smoke-free multi-unit housing to systematically mitigate risks for infection and more severe consequences after infection.

Continue to support Alameda County's low-income communities of color in working towards and ensuring health equity among residents,

SMOKING SUPPRESSES IMMUNE

FUNCTION
Smoking (including vaping) destroys cilia in the lungs, which is one of the main defenses against infection. With reduced lung capacity and compromised respiratory systems, people who smoke have increased risk of serious illness including COVID-19.
1,2

SMOKING STATUS IS A RISK FACTOR
FOR SEVERE COVID-19
There are several pathways through which people who smoke are at elevated risk for contracting this disease. First, SARS-CoV-2 (the virus responsible for COVID-19) uses the ACE2 receptor to enter cells. People who smoke have increased ACE2 compared to former smokers and nonsmokers. This suggests it is easier for the virus to infect airways of people who currently smoke, leaving them most vulnerable to COVID-19.

Second, repetitive hand-to-face movements and sharing smoking devices also increases risk of virus transmission.
3 5
6 4
Tobacco retailers typically locate in low-income communities of color.

Industry history of targeting these communities lead to disproportionate rates of health conditions that leave them more vulnerable to virusrelated death. COVID-19 continues to widen racial disparities in Alameda County: Locally, the virus-related mortality rate for Black populations is over 2 times that of all deaths (8.1 vs. 3.7 deaths per 100,000 residents). 12 11
People who smoke contract more respiratory ailments than those who do not: Smoking is responsible for many health conditions including COPD, heart disease and asthma. Those who smoke also have increased risk of pneumonia, the most common diagnosis for more severe COVID-19. A recent meta-analysis by the World Health Organization concluded smoking is associated with increased disease severity and death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
8 7
9 10
Updated June 1, 2020
City Council/RSA Agenda 347 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Albany
2019
Livermore
2019
1 2
Unincorporated
Alameda County
2020
Fremont
2019
Oakland
2020
Hayward
2020
Dublin
2020
Pleasanton
2020
Union City
2010
Newark
No TRL
Berkeley
2019
San Leandro
2017
Alameda
2018
Piedmont
No TRL
Emeryville
No TRL
Tobacco Retail Licensing (TRL) Policy Status
& Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions,
by jurisdiction with adoption year
Legend
Local TRL Policy Status
No TRL
TRL without restrictions on flavored tobacco sales
TRL with partial restrictions on flavored tobacco sales TRL with full ban on flavored tobacco sales
.
0 5 10
Miles

1. The City of Berkeley oversees its own tobacco control policy and implementation efforts.

2. Unincorporated Alameda County iincludes Ashland, Cherryland, Castro Valley, Fairview, San Lorenzo, and Sunol
Updated August 2020
Alameda County, CA
City Council/RSA Agenda 348 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 349 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 350 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 351 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 352 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 353 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 354 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 355 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 356 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 357 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 358 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 359 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 360 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 361 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 362 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 363 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 364 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 365 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 366 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 367 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 368 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
City Council/RSA Agenda 369 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
[Type here]
January 10, 2022
The Honorable Mayor Carol Dutra-Vernaci, Vice Mayor Jaime Patino, and Councilmembers Emily Duncan, Pat Gacoscos, and Gary Singh City Council of Union City
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587
RE: Support to proceed NOW to update and strengthen Union City’s Tobacco Retail License
Dear Mayor Dutra-Vernaci, Vice Mayor Patino, and Councilmembers:

Breathe California of the Bay Area, Golden Gate, and Central Coast urges you to act now to strengthen Union City’s Tobacco Retail License. Specifically, we urge you to prioritize the four concrete recommendations that were presented to you by the Union City Youth Commissioners last fall:
• end the sale of flavored tobacco including menthol, with no exemptions • end the sale of e-cigarettes
• end tobacco sales in pharmacies
• strengthen price/pack requirements for tobacco products ($8 minimum/20 pack size).

Such an ordinance would prevent youth tobacco use, prevent addiction, and save lives.

Please see the staff report and introductions to your current tobacco laws for numerous citations of research from Alameda County Public Health, CDC, and others.

Our agency, founded in San Jose in 1911, is dedicated to working to prevent. initiation to tobacco use. This has become more and more difficult due to the lure of flavored tobacco and e-cigarette (vaping) products. Over 80% of teens who smoke start with a flavored tobacco product.

Timing is important here, as Big Tobacco’s ballot initiative has put SB 793, the state law to ban flavored tobacco and vaping products, into suspension until the November 2022 election. Local anti-tobacco laws are more important than ever. Every day that you do not act, Union City youth are trying flavored tobacco, with many to become addicted and continue using tobacco for life.

Although your current TRL has many protective elements, now is the time to improve it, to better protect those targeted by the tobacco industry, especially communities of color, disadvantaged communities, and LGBTQ populations.

Please proceed now to join the 73% of local jurisdictions in Alameda County that have a sales ban on flavored tobacco,
Margo Sidener, MS, CHES
Chief Executive Officer
Breathe California
of the Bay Area,
Golden Gate, and
Central Coast
1469 Park Avenue
San Jose, CA 95126
Phone: (408) 998-5865
Toll-Free: 1-877-3-BREATHE
Fax: (408) 998-0578
www.lungsrus.org
[email protected]
Tax ID#: 94-1156307

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Chairperson
Amresh Prasad
Secretary
Sulochina Lulla, MD, MPH
Treasurer
Justin Henry
Directors
Roslyn Bienenstock, RRT,
MPH
Joann Blessingmoore, MD
Robert Carr
Thomas M. Dailey, MD,
FCCP
Frank DeBiaso
Sogol Karkouti
Ray Mendoza
Rohan Shamapant
Richard Steadman
Abhay Tewari
Chief Executive Officer
Margo Sidener, MS, CHES
A member of the
Breathe America ™
Alliance
City Council/RSA Agenda 370 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
ITEM 7.A.

INFORMATIONAL REPORT AND RECEIVE

COUNCIL DIRECTION REGARDING

TOBACCO RETAIL LICENSE UPDATE
City Council/RSA Agenda 371 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Informational Report - No Action Required
Staff recommends proceeding with an update
to the tobacco retail licenses after theNovember 2022 elections results are available.

Other alternative options for consideration
include:
1)Do not proceed with an update to the tobacco
retail license ordinance; or
2)Proceed now with an update to the tobacco
retail license
City Council/RSA Agenda 372 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Strategic Plan:

Updating the City’s tobacco retail
license ordinance is currently not part of the strategic plan.

City staff are fully engaged with
the City Council priorities addressed in the strategic plan and to address a code update at this time will divert staffing from other priorities.

City Council/RSA Agenda 373 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
4 BACKGROUND
UC Tobacco Retail License Ordinance established in 2010 and updated in 2013
Youth Commission and Tackle Tobacco Workgroup (TTW)
recommendations:
1) banning flavored tobacco products2) ending the sale of electronic smoking devices3) ending the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies 4) increasing the minimum price/and or pack size requirement for tobacco products
City Council/RSA Agenda 374 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
5 BACKGROUNDTobacco Use and COVID-19: Data supports succession of tobacco decrease the effects of severe disease progression and risk of mortality
Those who smoke are more likely to test positive for COVID19 City Council/RSA Agenda 375 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
6 DISCUSSION – STATE
Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 793 into law in August 2020.

SB 793 prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, statewide effective January 1, 2021.

A referendum that qualified for the November 2022 general election suspended the implementation of the statewide flavored tobacco law until it is approved or rejected by voters statewide this November.

City Council/RSA Agenda 376 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
7 DISCUSSION – FEDERAL
April 29, 2021
US Drug and Food Administration (FDA)Stated it is working toward issuing proposed product standards within the next year to ban the sale of menthol tobacco products.

If implemented, the FDA’s enforcement of any ban on menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars will address manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, importers, and retailers (by taking these products out of the market).

City Council/RSA Agenda 377 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
8 DISCUSSION - LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
Local jurisdictions have the power to enact stronger laws than the state and the suspension of SB-793 does not prohibit local jurisdictions from moving forward with implementing laws ending the sale of flavored tobacco.
80% of all jurisdictions within Alameda County have established tobacco retail license ordinances including Union City
73% of local jurisdictions in Alameda County have a complete sales ban on flavored tobacco, with the vast majority categorizing “menthol” as a flavor City’s Authority
City Council/RSA Agenda 378 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
9 DISCUSSION – UC ORDINANCE PROTECTIONS:

City does provide protections through its current Tobacco Retail License Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance: • Density and Youth-Sensitive Areas (bans sale of tobacco within 1,000 feet of parks, playgrounds, libraries, recreation centers, religious institutions and youth-oriented establishments) • Little Cigar Pack Size (minimum pack size of 5) • Minimum Price (a single premium cigar shall cost at least $5) • Limits Discounts and Coupons (which increases the cost of low-cost tobacco products)
City Council/RSA Agenda 379 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
10 POTENTIAL AREAS OF CONSIDERATION TRL ORDINANCE:

A. Ban on Flavored Tobacco Sales (including menthol)
“Flavored Tobacco Product” means any tobacco product that imparts a characterizing flavor.B. Prohibit Electronic Smoking Device Sales (cannabis electronic smoking devises are permitted)
C.Density and Youth-Sensitive Areas (in addition to prohibiting tobacco sales within 1,000 feet of youth populated areas; prohibittobacco sales withing 500 feet of existing tobacco retailers; limit thetotal number of tobacco retail licenses to 1 per 2,500 residents) City Council/RSA Agenda 380 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
11 POTENTIAL AREAS OF CONSIDERATION FOR UPDATING UC TRL ORDINANCE CONT.

D. Increase the Little Cigar Pack Size (from 5 to 20)“Little Cigar” means any roll of tobacco other than a Cigarette wrapped entirely or in part intobacco or any substance containing tobacco and weighing no more than three pounds perthousand.E. Increase Minimum Price (from $5 to $8 cigarettes, little cigars, premiumcigars)The City could establish additional minimum price for tobacco products. For example,unincorporated Alameda County establishes a minimum price of $8 per package oftwenty (20) cigarettes, $8 per package of little cigars, and $8 per cigar.F. Implement Tobacco-Free PharmaciesTobacco sales in pharmacies send mixed messages to customers about tobacco’shealth risks. An amended ordinance can make pharmacies ineligible to receive orrenew a tobacco retailer license.

City Council/RSA Agenda 381 Tuesday, January 11, 2022
12 Proceed with an update to the tobacco retail licenses after the November 2022 elections results are available. Other alternative options for consideration include:1) Do not proceed with an update to the tobacco retail license ordinance; or 2) Proceed now with an update to the tobacco retaillicense Recommendation
Q&A?
City Council/RSA Agenda 382 Tuesday, January 11, 2022

Union City City CouncilJanuary 11, 2022

Union City City Council
January 11, 2022