Union City City Council
June 13, 2023

AGENDA

CITY OF UNION CITY/

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor (District 1)
JAMIE PATIÑO,Councilmember (District 2)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, June 13, 2023
7:00 PM
City Hall- Council Chamber
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.a. Pledge of Allegiance

1.b. Roll Call

2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3.a. Proclamation Recognizing June 19, 2023 as Juneteenth

3.b. Proclamation In Recognition Of June 2023 As LGBTQ+ Pride Month

3.c. Presentation On The Union City Local Roadway Safety Plan

4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
An individual speaker shall have three minutes to address the Council on non-agenda items under the Oral Communications section of the agenda. The Chair may, in their discretion, lower the time limit to less than three minutes based on the number of speakers and/or business to be conducted by the City Council.

City Council/RSA Agenda 1 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Members of the public who wish to speak to the Council under the first Oral Communications section are requested to complete a speaker card, giving their name and city of residence. If a speaker wants further notification from the City, the speaker may include a mailing address. Neither a speaker card or identification of name, city of residence or mailing address are not required to provide public comment but are requested for record keeping purposes.

4.a. Written Public Comment - Wallace

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by one motion. If discussion is required on a specific item, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered separately.

5.a. Waived Further Reading of Proposed Ordinance
(This permits reading the title only in lieu of reciting the entire text of any proposed Ordinance.)

5.b. Approve The Minutes Of The City Council Meeting Helds On May 9, 2023, May 23, 2023, And June 6, 2023

5.c. Adopt A Resolution Authorizing The Submission Of A Joint Application For And Participation In The Homekey Program And Authorizing The City Manager, Or Their Designee, To Approve The Final Joint Application To The State And Execute The Application And The Homekey Documents On Behalf Of
The City Of Union City For Participation In The Homekey Program

5.d. Adopt A Resolution Authorizing The Acceptance Of The Officer Wellness And Mental Health Grant (AB 178), In The Amount Of $47,039.54 And Amending The Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Police Department Grants Budget

5.e. Adopt A Resolution Approving A List Of Projects For Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Funded By SB 1: The Road Repair And
Accountability Act Of 2017

5.f. Adopt A Resolution Giving Standing Authority To The City Manager To Accept And Appropriate All Donations Made To The Police Department And Community & Recreation Services Department

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS

6.a. Public Hearing To Adopt A Resolution Approving The 2023- 2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual
Action Plan And Authorizing The City Manager To Submit The 2023-2024 CDBG Annual Action Plan To The U.S Department Of Housing And Urban Development And To Execute All
Documents And Certifications Necessary To Secure And Award City Council/RSA Agenda 2 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Funding For The City And Adopt A Resolution 1) Accepting The Updated Public Service Needs Assessment And 2) Awarding $245,000 Annually From The General Fund For Public Service Grants For FY 23/24 And FY 24/25, Subject To Final Adoption Of The FY 23/24 And FY 24/25 City Budget

6.b. Public Hearing On The Proposed FY 2023-2024 And FY 2024- 2025 Biennial Budget And Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan For FY 2023-2024 Through FY 2027-2028

6.c. Public Hearing Report On Voting Results On Proposed Increase Of Landfill, Compost, And Recycle Collection
Services Rates For Fiscal Year 2023-2024 And Adopt A
Resolution Establishing Annual Rates For Landfill, Compost, And Recycle Collection Services Effective July 1, 2023 And Amending The Master Fee Schedule For Fiscal Year 2023-
2024 Incorporating The Updated Rates

7. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

7.a. Policy Direction To Proceed With A Competitive Procurement Request For Proposals For Future Franchise Agreements For Landfill, Compost, And Recycle Collection Services And Adopt A Resolution Approving The First Amendment To The
Consulting Services Agreement With R3 Consulting Group, Inc. (C5923), For Franchise Agreement Consulting Services, To Extend The Expiration Of The Agreement To December 31,
2024 And To Increase The Agreement Amount By $85,000,
For A Total Not-To-Exceed Amount $135,000, And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute The Amendment In A Form
Approved By The City Attorney

8. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
None

9. AUTHORITIES AND AGENCIES - None

10. CITY COMMISSION / COMMITTEE REPORTS - None

11. SCHEDULED ORAL COMMUNICATION - None

12. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL

13. GOOD OF THE ORDER

14. CLOSED SESSION - None

15. ADJOURNMENT

PEOPLE OF UNION CITY
The City Council's regular meetings are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. inside the Council Chamber at City Hall, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City CA 94587. The City continues to offer an opportunity to participate in Council meetings via Zoom at: http://citycouncilCity Council/RSA Agenda 3 Tuesday, June 13, 2023 live.unioncity.org/ ; Passcode: u8SH9cH^
Meetings are broadcast live through UCTV Channel 15 and via live stream at:
https://unioncity.org/199/City-Meetings-Video
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of City Council members relating to each item of business referred to on this agenda are available for review on the City's website at www.unioncity.org or during regular business hours in the Office of the City Clerk located at 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City CA 94587.

In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (510) 675-5448. Notification 36 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City also provides closed captioning of all its Regular City Council Meetings for the hearing impaired.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Written Comment: To provide written comment on an item on the agenda or to address the Council about an issue during Public Comment, you may send an email to [email protected]. Please include the phrase "public comment" in the subject line and note the agenda item number that you want to address. Written comments will be e-mailed to the City Council and made publicly available.

Public Comment via Teleconference: Members of the public may address the Council on a matter on the agenda or during the Public Input portion of the meeting. Raise your virtual hand to notify the host that you would like to speak during that portion.

CITY COUNCIL NORMALS AND GUIDELINES (Resolution No. 6095-23; Adopted 03/14/2023) The City Council of the City of Union City comply with the following norms:

1. We conduct ourselves in a professional manner, treat everyone with respect, and act with high integrity, always putting the interests of the City of Union City ahead of self-interests in accordance with our code of ethics.

2. We respect the Council-Manager form of government, and do not interfere with the City Manager's role or any professional duties of City Staff.

3. We recognize that matters of confidential nature are to be kept private and undisclosed.

4. We respect each other's opinions and are supportive of each other's work advocating for the City, and we ensure that all voices are heard. We do not criticize others for having a different point of view, and we agree to disagree respectfully.

5. We understand that the City Council acts as a body, all members are equal, and policy direction is only given by a majority vote of the City Council. Once a decision is made, all members of the City Council must respect the City Council's decision.

6. We will be prepared for City Council meetings and ask our questions of the City Manager in advance City Council/RSA Agenda 4 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
so we can avoid surprising City staff at meetings.

7. We do not criticize City staff publicly or to others and will refrain from directing them. Instead, we will take our concerns and questions privately to the City Manager.

8. We will govern on an at-large basis, although elected by districts. We will maintain a citywide perspective and consider the needs and interests of the entire community.

9. We will continue to allocate resources based on long-term strategic priorities and efforts, with consideration a citywide service levels and financial capacity.

10. We understand customer service is the priority and each member of the City Council will help constituents regardless of the district in which they reside or from which a Councilmember themselves is elected.

May these Council Norms be administered and enforced in the following manner:

1. Councilmembers have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met be the Council, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government.

2. The Mayor and the Council have the responsibility to intervene when action of its members are in violation of Council Norms.

3. The City Council can review and revise the Council Norms as needed.

4. During City Council discussions, deliberations, and proceedings, the Mayor is designated with the primary responsibility to ensure that Councilmembers adhere to the Council Norms.

CERTIFICATION OF MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA POSTING
I, Anna M. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Union City, California, state under penalty of perjury that this notice/agenda was posted at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting date, in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, on the City's Website and on the bulletin board of City Hall.

City Council/RSA Agenda 5 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Proclamation Recognizing June 19, 2023,as Juneteenth Attachment City Council/RSA Agenda 6 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROCLAMATION
Recognizing June 19, 2023, as Juneteenth

WHEREAS, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, declaring the slaves in Confederate territory free, paving the way for the passing of the 13th Amendment which formally abolished slavery in the United States of America; and WHEREAS, word about the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation was delayed over two and half years to June 19, 1865, when Major General Gordon Granger and Union Army troops marched to Galveston, Texas to enforce the Emancipation Proclamation and free the last enslaved Black Americans in the South; and WHEREAS, June 19th has a special meaning, and is called "JUNETEENTH" by combining the words June and Nineteenth, and has been celebrated by the African-American community for over 150 years and commemorates the historical significance of June 19, 1865, nine decades after our Nation’s founding; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden signed the “Juneteenth National Independence Day Act,” into law, which designates Juneteenth National Independence Day as a legal federal holiday; and
WHEREAS, Juneteenth is a celebration of freedom, a day that should be recognized by all Americans and especially within the City of Union City, as a commitment to our shared work to ensure racial justice, equity, and equality in America; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Union City does hereby proclaim June 19th, 2023 as Juneteenth.

DATED this 13th day of June 2023.

CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Councilmember
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember
JEFF WANG, Councilmember
City Council/RSA Agenda 7 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
In Recognition Of June 2023As LGBTQ+ Pride Month Attachment City Council/RSA Agenda 8 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CITY OF UNION CITY

PROCLAMATION

In Recognition of June 2023 as LGBTQ+ Pride Month

WHEREAS, the City of Union City has a diverse Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) community and is committed to supporting the visibility, dignity, equity, and inclusion of all people in the community; and WHEREAS, the month of June is recognized as LGBTQ+ Pride Month to acknowledge the June 1969 Stonewall Uprising when patrons and supporters of the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York City, staged an uprising to resist police harassment and persecution to which LGBTQ+ Americans were blatantly subjected to. Though not the beginning of the LGBTQ+ movement, it was a galvanizing force for LGBTQ+ political activism; and

WHEREAS, all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. LGBTQ+ individuals have had an immeasurable impact on the cultural, civic, and economic successes of our country; and WHEREAS, various advancements have been made with respect to equitable treatment of LGBTQ+ persons throughout the nation, the City of Union City celebrates how far we have come and reaffirms our steadfast belief in the equal dignity of all; and

WHEREAS, celebrating LGBTQ+ Pride Month influences awareness and provides support and advocacy for the City of Union City’s LGBTQ+ community, and is an opportunity to take action and engage in dialogue to strengthen alliances, build acceptance, and advance equal rights; and
WHEREAS, the Rainbow Flag, also known as the Pride Flag, has been used since the 1970s as a symbol of LGBTQ+ pride.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Union City does hereby proclaim the month of June 2023 as LGBTQ+ Pride Month, and on June 1, 2023, will raise the Rainbow Flag and have it flown throughout the month of June to recognize all LGBTQ+ residents whose influential and lasting contributions to our neighborhoods make Union City a vibrant community in which to live, work, and visit.

DATED this 13th day of June 2023.

CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Councilmember
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember
JEFF WANG, Councilmember
City Council/RSA Agenda 9 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Union City
Local Roadway Safety Plan
Presented by:

Trieu Tran, P.E.Union City Public Works Dept.

In coordination with:Christopher Thnay, P.E., AICPAdvanced Mobility Group Item 3c. Presentation
June 13, 2023 - City Council Meeting
City Council/RSA Agenda 10 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda

1. Project Background &
Objectives

2. Areas of Emphasis Findings3. Countermeasures and
Recommendations
City Council/RSA Agenda 11 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Project Background & Objectives
•Enhance the safety of the City’s roadway
system
•Improve transportation safety by reducing the
number of incidents and the severity
•Identify high need areas and stakeholder
priorities and establish LRSP vision and goals
•Review potential solutions and
countermeasures
•Prioritize implementation•Develop LRSP (Local Roadway Safety Plan) City Council/RSA Agenda 12 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Funding Opportunities
• HSIP (CALTRANS Local Highway Safety Improvement Program, $15B) • SS4A (Safe Streets for All, $1B Federal Funding available in 2023)• TDA - Transportation Development Act • ATP – Active Transportation Program
• AlaCTC CIP (Alameda Comprehensive Investment Plan)
• AlaCTC DLD (Measure B, BB, VRF Funding)
City Council/RSA Agenda 13 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Collision Analysis
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
All 197 326 302 227 241 51F+SI 6 14 10 12 10 0
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Collisions
Annual Collisions by Year (2017-2022)
184
301
269 204
221
46 7
8 12
10 9
1 6
17 21
13 11
4 82%
84%
86%88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Percentage of Collisions (%)
Annual Collisions by Year & Mode (2017-2022)
Motor Vehicle Bicycle Pedestrian
Total Collisions (2017 to 2022) – 1,344
Fatal & Severe Injury - 52
City Council/RSA Agenda 14 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Collision Analysis
Improper Turning
35%
Unsafe Speed
29%
DUI
13%
Traffic Signals &
Signs
12%
Automobile
Right-of-Way
11%
Top Five Collisions by Primary Collision Factors
City Council/RSA Agenda 15 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Top 10 Corridors and Top 10 Intersections
City Council/RSA Agenda 16 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Areas of Emphasis Findings
• Speeding• Lighting Condition• Aggressive Drivers• Inexperienced Drivers• Pedestrian Safety• Bike Safety City Council/RSA Agenda 17 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Transportation Safety Survey Results (Late 2022)
City Council/RSA Agenda 18 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Collision Analysis - Speeding
Total Collisions – 308
(2017 to 2022)
Fatal & Severe Injury - 5
10 9
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
3 Top 10 High Collision Intersections
City Council/RSA Agenda 19 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
2% 2%
59%
32%
4%
1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Daylight Dark - Street
Lights
Dusk - Dawn Dark - No
Street
Lights/Not
Functioning
Collisions
Lighting Conditions
Collisions By Lighting Conditions
F+SI All Other
Collision Analysis – Lighting Conditions
Total Collisions – 476
(2017 to 2022)
Fatal & Severe Injury - 24
10 9
8 7
6 5
4 2 3
1 3
Top 10 High Collision Intersections
City Council/RSA Agenda 20 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Collision Analysis – Pedestrians
Total Collisions - 72
(2017 to 2022)
Fatal & Severe Injury - 17
City Council/RSA Agenda 21 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Collision Analysis - Bicycles
Total Collisions - 49
(2017 to 2022)
Fatal & Severe Injury -
6 City Council/RSA Agenda 22 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Countermeasures & Recommendations
The safety strategies of a few elements of a Safe System Approach are used:• Safe Roads • Safe Speeds and• Safe Road Users City Council/RSA Agenda 23 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Reduce Excessive Speed
Potential Countermeasures LRSM #
1 Increase Yellow Change Interval (YCI) & All Rd Time NA2 Add Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) S21PB3 Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs R264 Provide advanced dilemma zone detection forhigh speed approaches S04 5 Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface
Treatments)
R21
6 Install Separated Bike Lanes R33PB7 Reduce lane width to 11-foot NA8 Coordinate signals at lower speed NA9 Apply Assembly Bill (AB) 43 methodology to lower speed limits NA Notes:LRSM - Local. Roadway Safety Manual, April 2020
City Council/RSA Agenda 24 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Improve Lighting Condition
Potential Countermeasures LRSM #
1 Check and Add intersection lighting S012 Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates S023 Install flashing beacons as advance warning S104 Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) S095 Add signal head for each lane • While most nighttime
collisions occurred where streetlights were present, the quality of the lighting can vary widely. • Streetlights can be
insufficiently bright or placed too widely apart.
• Nearly 30 to 50% of collisions
occurred during nighttime at Top 10 Intersections.

City Council/RSA Agenda 25 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Calm Aggressive Drivers
Potential Countermeasures LRSM #
1 High Visibility Enforcement NA2 Driver education and media campaign NA3 Coordinate signals at lower speed NA4 Provide advanced dilemma zone detection forhigh speed approaches S04 • High-visibility enforcement is
a multifaceted approach through highly visible patrols, such as checkpoints, saturation patrols, or message boards. • Coordinating traffic signals at
a lower speed has shown to be effective. Speeds during nighttime are usually higher so signals could be coordinated at a lower speed.

City Council/RSA Agenda 26 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Improve Pedestrian Safety
• There are clusters of
pedestrian collisions along Decoto Road near BART and shopping centers. And along Alvaro-Niles Road near Logan High. • Should heighten presence of
pedestrians and help serve pedestrian desire lines.
• Improve lighting and add
traffic calming.

Potential Countermeasures LRSM #
1 Add Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) S21PB2 Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) S20PB3 No right-turn dynamic sign NA4 Protected Intersections NA5 Install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations S20PB6 Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) NS22PB7 Install Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) NS23PB Notes:LRSM - Local. Roadway Safety Manual, April 2020
City Council/RSA Agenda 27 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Improve Bike Safety
Potential Countermeasures LRSM #
1 Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) S20PB2 Bike Activation NA3 Add Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) S21PB4 Protected Intersections NA5 Buffer Bike Lanes R32PB6 Class 4 Cycle Track R33PB Notes:LRSM - Local. Roadway Safety Manual, April 2020
Adding buffer or separated bike lanes to facilitate east-west and north-south travel in the City would be a huge improvement and will also calm traffic along major arterials.

City Council/RSA Agenda 28 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Questions?
Thank you
City Council/RSA Agenda 29 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Public Comment - Wallace Attachment
City Council/RSA Agenda 30 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 31 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 32 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 33 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
City Council/RSA Agenda 34 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Minutes 05.09.23 Attachment
Minutes 05.23.23 Special Study Session Attachment
Minutes 05.23.23 Closed Session Attachment
Minutes 06.06.23 Attachment
City Council/RSA Agenda 35 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
AGENDA

CITY OF UNION CITY/

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI, Mayor
GARY SINGH, Vice Mayor (District 1)
JAMIE PATIÑO Councilmember (District 2)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, May 9, 2023
7:00 PM
City Hall- Council Chamber
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m.

1.a. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci led the salute to the flag.

1.b. Roll Call Present: Mayor Carol Dutra-Vernaci, Vice Mayor Gary Singh, Councilmembers Patiño, Wang and
Sakakihara

Absent: None

2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None

3. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

3.a. Proclamation Recognizing May As Asian American, Native Hawaiian, And Pacific Islander Heritage Month
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci read the proclamation aloud. The proclamation was accepted by former Union City Councilmember, Pat Gacoscos.

3.b. Presentation Recognizing New Haven School Foundation’s 2023 Earth Day Poster Contest Winners
Michael Ritchie and Shruti Kumar announced the winners of the poster contest as:

City Council/RSA Agenda 36 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci presented each with certificates.

4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Public comment given by Ann Yap-Jequinto.

Written comment submitted by Kendahyl Wallace (Attachment A)

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Vice Mayor Singh, and seconded by Councilmember Wang, to adopt consent calendar items 5.a. through 5.f. The motion was carried by a unanimous role call vote.

5.a. Waived Further Reading of Proposed Ordinance
(This permits reading the title only in lieu of reciting the entire text of any proposed Ordinance.)

5.b. Approved The Minutes Of The City Council Meeting Held On April 25, 2023

5.c. Adopted Resolution No. 6118-23 Accepting Completion Of The Enhancement Of Pedestrian Infrastructure (Safe Routes To School (SRTS) Improvements) At James Logan High School And Guy Emanuele, Jr. Elementary School, City Project No. 21-27

5.d. Adopted Resolution No. 6119-23 Approving An Amendment To The Consulting Services Agreement With Ascent Environmental, Inc. (C5843), For Preparation Of The Sixth Cycle Housing Element Update And Safety Element Update, Extending The Expiration Of The Agreement To December 31, 2023, Increasing The Agreement Amount By $47,620, For A Total Not-To-Exceed Amount Of $300,000, And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute The Amendment In A Form Approved By The City Attorney

5.e. Adopted Resolution No. 6120-23 Authorizing The Acceptance Of A Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) Grant, From The Association Of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), In The Amount Of $39,392, For Fiscal Year 2022-2023, To Support The Preparation Of The 2023-2031 Sixth Cycle Housing Element, Amending The Fiscal Year 2022-2023 HCD Fund Budget, And Authorizing The City Manager To Execute The Necessary Grant Documents In A Form Acceptable To The City Attorney

5.f. Waive The Second Reading And Adopted Ordinance No. 913-23 Approving An Amendment To The Station East Mixed Use / Residential Project Development Agreement (ADA-23-001) And Adopt A Resolution Adopting An Addendum To The Station East Mixed Use / Residential Project Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2020039032)

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS

6.a. Public Hearing And Introduction Of An Ordinance Of The City Council Of The City Of Union City Approving And Re-Adopting A Military Equipment Use Policy As Stated In Chapter 2.62 “Military Equipment Use Policy” Of The Union City Municipal Code In Compliance With Assembly Bill 481 City Council/RSA Agenda 37 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Lieutenants Andrew Holt and Brian Baumgartner presented the staff report.

Staff responded to questions from Council.

Mayor Dutra-Vernaci opened the public hearing. There were no public comments.

Mayor Dutra-Vernaci closed the public hearing. There was no public comment.

Councilmembers provided comment.

It was moved by Vice Mayor Singh and seconded by Councilmember Patiño to introduce an Ordinance Approving And Re-Adopting A Military Equipment Use Policy As Stated In Chapter 2.62 “Military Equipment Use Policy” Of The Union City Municipal Code In Compliance With Assembly Bill 481. The motion was carried by a unanimous roll call vote.

6.b. Public Hearing And Adoption Of A Resolution Approving The Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Master Fee Schedule
Finance Director Jackie Acosta presented the staff report highlighting the changes to this fiscal year’s changes. Staff responded to questions from Council.

Mayor Dutra-Vernaci opened the public hearing. There was no public comment.

Mayor Dutra-Vernaci closed the public hearing.

Councilmembers had no further comment.

It was moved by Councilmember Sakakihara and seconded by Vice Mayor Singh, to adopt Resolution No. 6121-23 Approving the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Master Fee Schedule

7. CITY MANAGER REPORTS - None

8. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - None

9. AUTHORITIES AND AGENCIES - None

10. CITY COMMISSION / COMMITTEE REPORTS - None

11. SCHEDULED ORAL COMMUNICATION - None

12. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL
Councilmember Wang reported on his attendance of meetings of the Waste Management Authority and the Chamber of Commerce. Councilmember Wang stated there is a Chamber Cares clean-up even this weekend.

Vice Mayor Singh reported on his attendance of the Alameda County Library Commission.

Councilmember Patiño reported on his attendance of the East Bay Community Energy meeting.

City Council/RSA Agenda 38 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci reported on her attendance of meetings of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Alameda County Transportation Commission. She also reported on her attendance of the first Mega Region Working Group, as part of the MTC.

13. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Councilmember Wang reported on his attendance of the Mizuho OSI ribbon cutting ceremony, the 10th Anniversary event of the Union City Family Center, and the Punjabi Cultural Mela (Festival).

Vice Mayor Singh reported on his attendance of the Punjabi Cultural Mela and thanked the Union City Police Department, City Manager Malloy and the Community and Recreation Services Department for their service and professionalism during the event.

Councilmember Sakakihara reported on his attendance of the Mizuho OSI ribbon cutting ceremony and the Punjabi Cultural Mela.

Councilmember Patiño reported on his attendance of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) conference on Economic Mobility a seminar in New York. He also reported on his attendance of the Community Leaders of America Spring Conference in McKinney, TX.

Mayor Dutra-Vernaci reported on her attendance of the Mizuho OSI ribbon cutting, a meeting with Executive Director of ACE and City staff, and the 10th Anniversary event for the Union City Family Center.

14. CLOSED SESSION - None

15. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci adjourned the meeting at 8:16 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Anna M. Brown, CMC
City Clerk
City Council/RSA Agenda 39 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING AND STUDY SESSION
Tuesday, May 23, 2023
5:00 PM
City Hall- Council Chamber
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.

1.a. Roll Call Present: Councilmembers Patiño, Sakakihara, Wang, Mayor Dutra-Vernaci

Absent: Vice Mayor Singh

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS – None

3. STUDY SESSION

3.a. Study Session On The Five-Year Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) For The Biennial Budget, FY 2023/2024 To FY 2027/2028, Excluding Any Transit-Related CIP Projects
City Manager Joan Malloy, Finance Director Jacki Acosta and Public Works Director Marilou Ayupan presented the staff report covering the following categories:
 Roadway Improvements
 Bike/Ped Improvements
 Traffic/Street Lights
 Park Improvements
 City Facilities
 Police, Fire and IT Projects
City Council/RSA Agenda 40 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Staff responded to questions from Council. Councilmembers provided comment.

The item was informational only and required no formal action of the Council.

3.b. Study Session On The Five-Year Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) For The Biennial Budget, FY 2023/2024 To FY 2027/2028 For TransitRelated Projects Only Public Works Director Ayupan presented the staff report on Transit related projects and responded to questions from Council.

Councilmembers provided comment.

The item was informational only and required no formal action of the Council.

4. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci adjourned the meeting at 6:05 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Anna M. Brown, CMC
City Clerk
City Council/RSA Agenda 41 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

MINUTES

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday, May 23, 2023
6:00 PM
City Hall- Council Chamber
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci called the meeting to order At 6:15 P.M.

Roll Call Present: Councilmembers Patiño, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Singh, Mayor Dutra-Vernaci

Absent: None

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None

3. CLOSED SESSION

3.a. Conference With Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Gov. Code § 54956.9)(d)(4) (Initiation of Litigation)
Number of Potential Cases: One

3.b. Conference With Labor Negotiators
Gov. Code Section 54957.6
Agency designated representative for Employee Organizations:

Lisa Achen, Interim Human Resources Director
Charles Flescher, IEDA Representative
For Unrepresented Employees:

Kristopher J. Kokotaylo, City Attorney
Employee organization:

Management Employees Group (MEG)
Professional Employees Group (PEG)
Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 (SEIU) City Council/RSA Agenda 42 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Unrepresented employees:

Employees subject to the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Unrepresented Employees

4. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci adjourned the meeting at 6:47 p.m. with the following report out regarding Item 3.a.:

The City Council authorized the City Attorney to initiate litigation against the State of California to file a “Test Claim” with the Commission on State Mandates to obtain reimbursement for the costs of implementing Regional Board permitting requirements for Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit, Order No. R2-2002- 0018. The action was approved by a vote of 5-0 with all councilmembers present.

Respectfully submitted,
Anna M. Brown, CMC
City Clerk
City Council/RSA Agenda 43 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

MINUTES

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING AND STUDY SESSION
Tuesday, June 6, 2023
5:00 PM
City Hall- Council Chamber
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road
Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.

1.a. Roll Call

Present: Councilmembers Patino, Sakakihara, Wang, Vice Mayor Singh, Mayor Dutra-Vernaci

Absent: None

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None

3. STUDY SESSION

3.a. Study Session On The Proposed FY 2023-2024 And FY 2024-2025 Operating Budget
City Manager Joan Malloy provided an introduction of the evening presentation including big picture forecast and the budget’s alignment with the City Council’s strategic plan goals.

Department Heads presented the accomplishments, challenges, and current and future initiatives for their respective departments.

City Manager Malloy presented a summary of new positions included in the budget.

Finance Director Acosta presented the following information:

City Council/RSA Agenda 44 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
 General Fund financial status
 Comparison of local taxes collected throughout the cities in Alameda County
 Summary of key revenue/expenditure assumptions
 General Fund revenue/expenditure trends
 Structural deficit summary
 Next steps through to adoption of the budget
Staff responded to questions from Council. Councilmembers provided comment.

This item was informational only and required no formal action of the Council.

4. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Dutra-Vernaci adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
Anna M. Brown, CMC
City Clerk
City Council/RSA Agenda 45 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 6/13/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CARMELA CAMPBELL, ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A JOINT

APPLICATION FOR AND PARTICIPATION IN THE HOMEKEY

PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR THEIR

DESIGNEE, TO APPROVE THE FINAL JOINT APPLICATION TO THE

STATE AND EXECUTE THE APPLICATION AND THE HOMEKEY

DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY FOR

PARTICIPATION IN THE HOMEKEY PROGRAM
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) authorizing the submittal of a joint application for Homekey Round 3 funds with other Alameda County cities and Bay Area Community Services (BACS) to acquire homes and convert them to supportive shared housing for people experiencing homelessness.

Specifically, the Resolution:

Authorizes, and directs, the submission of a joint Application with BACS and other jurisdictions within Alameda County to the State of California Housing and Community Development Department ("HCD") in response to the Homekey Notice of Funding Availability, and to apply for Homekey grant funds in a totalamount not to exceed $10,000,000; and,
Authorizes, and directs, entering into, executing, and delivering a Standard Agreement with the Department in a total amount not to exceed $10,000,000, and any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to secure the Homekey funds from the Department and to participate in the Homekey Program, and allamendments thereto if the Application is approved; and, Acknowledges that the City shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Standard Agreement, and that the NOFA and application will be incorporated in the Standard Agreement by reference and made a part thereof; that any and all activities, expenditures, information, and timelines represented in the application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement; and, that funds are to be used for the allowable expenditures and activities identified in the Standard Agreement; and, Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to approve the final joint Application to the State and execute the Application and the Homekey Documents on behalf of the City of Union City for participation in the Homekey Program.

City Council/RSA Agenda 46 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is in alignment with the following:

Goal C, Strategy 3: Develop a multi-departmental approach to address homelessness through coordination with staff, community organizations and Alameda County.

BACKGROUND
In 2020, the State of California created the Homekey Program, which provides funding to local agencies and jurisdictions to acquire, rehabilitate, or master lease a variety of housing types, including hotels, motels, and other buildings, for the purpose of providing interim or permanent housing options for persons experiencing homelessness.

Administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD),the program’s first award cycle made $600 million in grant funding available to public entities including cities, counties, or other local public entities, within California to purchase and rehabilitate a variety of housing types in order to serve people experiencing homelessness or at risk of serious illness from COVID-19.

The first funding cycle in 2020 provided $75 million to projects in Alameda County, including the acquisition of hotels participating in the Project Roomkey Program, the rehabilitation of a former student dormitory into a shelter and permanent supportive housing, and the acquisition of single-family homes to provide shared housing.

The second funding cycle in 2022 provided $2.75 billion in acquisition and rehabilitation funds, as well as $1 billion in funds for operating expenses. The funding amount represented the State’s largest investment in housing for the homeless.

The State of California’s 2023/2024 budget provides at least $736 million in Homekey funding to sustain and rapidly expand the inventory of housing for people experiencing homelessness or at- risk of homelessness and who are, thereby, inherently impacted by or at increased risk for medical diseases or conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic or other communicable diseases. Homekey is an opportunity for state, regional, and local public entities to develop a broad range of housing types, including but not limited to hotels, motels, hostels, single-family homes and multifamily apartments, adult residential facilities, manufactured housing, and to convert commercial properties and other existing buildings to permanent or interim housing.

These funding amounts represent the State's largest investment in housing for the homeless. The goal of the next Homekey funding cycle, which is referred to as Homekey Round 3, is to house tens of thousands of individuals experiencing homelessness. The State has also established priorities for project readiness, team experience, racialequity, and community impact.

Applications for Homekey Round 3 funds will be available on a continuous, over-the counter basis until July 28, 2023, but the deadline to access the Discretionary Reserve set-aside for Bay Area jurisdictions is June 30, 2023. There will be up to $40 million in funding available for single family home-scattered site projects with a limit of four projects, up to $10 million each.

Awarded projects will receive grants of up to $150,000 per housing unit or “Door” for scattered site projects, which refers to the number of sleeping rooms that can accommodate unhoused individuals within a residence.

The submitted application will utilize a 5 “Door” minimum in order to maximize funding for the project and make it viable. No local match is required for projects in Round 3 for the baseline contribution of $150,000 per door. However, the City may provide a local match which would increase the baseline contribution to City Council/RSA Agenda 47 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
$250,000 per “Door”.

Operating subsidies ranging from $1000 - $1400 per unit per month are also available for units assisted with Homekey funds for two to three years, depending on the amount of local operating match provided. Program requirements for grantees include completing the project within twelve months of receiving the award, applying the core components of Housing First approach to addressing homelessness and using local Coordinated Entry System (CES) prioritization protocols.

DISCUSSION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the submittal of a joint application for Homekey Round 3 funds with other Alameda County cities including Hayward, Livermore, and Piedmont and Bay Area Community Services (BACS) to acquire homes and convert them to supportive shared housing for people experiencing homelessness. This innovative program will provide much needed housing and support services for community members experiencing homelessness.

Since 1973, BACS has successfully operated supported independent living homes in Alameda and Contra Costa County. Under this highly cost-effective program model, BACS acquires, owns, operates, and manages small site, scattered, residential properties for individuals with special needs, including those experiencing homelessness. Each resident is paired with a Care Coordinator who helps them build independent living skills through job support, benefits assistance, mental health support, financial assistance, job support, group activities, and money management. Residents learn skills by sharing responsibilities for cleaning, paying bills, and running their household.

In 2020, BACS and the City of Oakland were awarded Homekey funds for this model and successfully acquired 15 homes and created 129 units of permanent housing for people experiencing homelessness referred to as Project Reclamation. BACS proposes replicating Project Reclamation by creating a regional supportive shared housing program that can leverage the operationalefficiencies of a single operator.

In August 2021, the City of Livermore issued a Request for Information to find suitable partners and projects for submittal of a Homekey Application. BACS submitted a proposal, which became the basis of the multijurisdictional application. After receiving the proposal, the City of Livermore reached out to other Alameda County cities to see if other jurisdictions wanted to be co-applicants on the application.

The City of Hayward is participating and has offered to serve as the lead applicant for the program and assume the primary administrative responsibilities of managing the grant in coordination with BACS. The current project application budget anticipates acquiring 6 homes, 1 of which would be in Union City. If additional jurisdictions participate in the program, the funding request will be increased accordingly, not to exceed a total request of $10,000,000.

As detailed above, the application will require matching funds directly from the City in order to maximize the amount of subsidy received should the application be awarded. The match amount is still being finalized but estimated to be approximately $238,000. Staff has allocated $139,647 from the FY 23-24 HOME allocation and the prior year’s HOME allocation for FY 22-23 of $83,707 for a total of $223,354. The remaining match amount (approximately $15,000) will be taken from prior years' unspent HOME funding, which will require coordination with the HOME Consortium managed by Alameda County. The local match will increase the allocation per “door” by $100,000 for a total of $250,000. It is estimated that this will result in $1.25 million available for acquisition of a single-family residence within the City based on the assumption that the residence will accommodate 5 rooms or “doors” for unhoused individuals. Operating costs will be covered by the Homekey grant for the first few years. After that, BACS and the co-applicant cities will also request operating funding from the Alameda County HOME Consortium, which would fulfill the State’s operating match requirements.

If the project is awarded funds and BACS acquires a property in Union City, the City will record a 55-year City Council/RSA Agenda 48 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
regulatory agreement against the subject property restricting the rents for extremely low-income households and establishing property maintenance and management standards. As proposed, if BACS were able to secure a residential property in the City through the program, that site would have a preference for local community members and residents.

If this agenda item is approved, staff will work with BACS and the other participating cities to submit the application prior to the June 30, 2023 deadline for the Discretionary Reserve funding. Due to the complicated nature of the multi-jurisdictional application and some of State HCD’s application requirements, should the group not be able to submit an application during the current NOFA period, staff will continue to work with the other jurisdictions to submit a Homekey application in subsequent rounds for the Discretionary Reserve funding as part of State HCD over-the-counter rolling application process for scattered sites. The Discretionary Reserve fund allocation of funding does allow for some additional programmatic flexibility for the multi-jurisdictional application and awards are made on a continuous basis from the State until all funding has been exhausted. Should no applications be selected as part of the State HCD Round 3 Homekey NOFA for the Discretionary Reserve Fund, those funds will then be allocated and moved into the general NOFA.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Homekey grant funds will pay the full amount of capital costs required to acquire and rehabilitate the units, as well as up to three years of funding to subsidize the project operations. Staff will look to utilize other additional Federal funds and other local funds, including HOME funds, to help subsidize project operations after this time period. In addition, in partnering with the City of Hayward and BACS as a co-applicant, the amount of City staff time administering the grant will be reduced as well.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Counciladopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1), which:

Authorizes, and directs, the submission of a joint Application with BACS and other jurisdictions within Alameda County to the State of California HCD in response to the Homekey Notice of Funding Availability, and to apply for Homekey grant funds in a totalamount not to exceed $10,000,000; and, Authorizes, and directs, entering into, executing, and delivering a Standard Agreement with the Department in a total amount not to exceed $10,000,000, and any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to secure the Homekey funds from the Department and to participate in the Homekey Program, and allamendments thereto if the Application is approved; and, Acknowledges that the City shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Standard Agreement, and that the NOFA and application will be incorporated in the Standard Agreement by reference and made a part thereof; that any and all activities, expenditures, information, and timelines represented in the application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement; and, that funds are to be used for the allowable expenditures and activities identified in the Standard Agreement; and, Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to approve the final joint Application to the State and execute the Application and the Homekey Documents on behalf of the City of Union City for participation in the Homekey Program.

Prepared by:

Francisco Gomez Jr., Housing & Community Development Manager City Council/RSA Agenda 49 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Submitted by:

Francisco Gomez Jr., Housing & Community Development Manager ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Resolution - Homekey Round 3Application Resolution
City Council/RSA Agenda 50 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-23

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A JOINT APPLICATION TO AND

PARTICIPATION IN THE HOMEKEY PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has issued a Notice of Funding Availability, dated March 29, 2023 (“NOFA”), for the Homekey Program (“Homekey” or “Program”). The Department has issued the NOFA for Homekey grant funds pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50675.1.3 (Assem. Bill No. 140 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.), § 20.); and
WHEREAS, City staff has worked in conjunction with the City of Livermore to utilize the City of Livermore’s Request for Information process that was released on August 11, 2021 which requested applications for “Projects and Properties to House People Experiencing Homelessness Through the Homekey Program” in which Bay Area Community Services submitted a proposal for the Project Reclamation supportive shared housing program and was selected; and WHEREAS, the City of Union City (“Co-Applicant”) desires to jointly apply for Homekey grant funds with the City of Hayward (the “Lead Applicant”). Therefore, Co-Applicant is joining the Lead Applicant in the submittal of an application for Homekey funds (“Application”) to the Department for review and consideration; and
WHEREAS, a local match is not required for the Application but providing a match will increase the allocation per “door” by $100,000 for a total of $250,000. It is estimated that this will result in $1.25 million available for acquisition of a single-family residence based on the assumption that the residence will accommodate 5 rooms or “doors” for unhoused individuals. The match amount is still being finalized but estimated to be approximately $238,000. Staff has allocated $139,647 from the FY 23-24 HOME allocation and the prior year’s HOME allocation for FY 22-23 of $83,707 for a total of $223,354. The remaining match amount (approximately $15,000) will be taken from prior years unspent HOME funding, which will require coordination with the HOME Consortium managed by Alameda County;
WHEREAS, the Department is authorized to administer Homekey pursuant to the Multifamily Housing Program (Chapter 6.7 (commencing with Section 50675) of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code). Homekey funding allocations are subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA, the Application, the Department-approved STD 213, Standard Agreement (“Standard Agreement”), and all other legal requirements of the Homekey Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT IS RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City authorizes the following:

1. Co-Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit a joint Application to the Department in response to the NOFA, and to jointly apply for Homekey grant funds in a total amount not to exceed $10,000,000.

City Council/RSA Agenda 51 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
XXXX-23

2. If the Application is approved, Co-Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver a Standard Agreement in a total amount not to exceed $10,000,000, any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to secure the Homekey funds from the Department and to participate in the Homekey Program, and all amendments thereto (collectively, the “Homekey Documents”)

3. Co-Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Standard Agreement, and that the NOFA and Application will be incorporated in the Standard Agreement by reference and made a part thereof.

Any and all activities, expenditures, information, and timelines represented in the Application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement. Funds are to be used for the allowable expenditures and activities identified in the Standard Agreement.

4. The City Manager, or his or her designee, is authorized to execute the Application and the Homekey Documents on behalf of Co-Applicant for participation in the Homekey Program.

City Council/RSA Agenda 52 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 6/13/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: POLICE CHIEF JARED RINETTI
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFICER WELLNESS AND MENTAL HEALTH GRANT (AB 178), IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,039.54, AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

POLICE DEPARTMENT GRANTS BUDGET
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of the Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant from the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) in the amount of $47,039.54.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Goal B.: Produce high-quality services to the community through a commitment to local government best practices and employee development, support, and retention.

Strategy 2: Establish professional development plans for each employee to optimize staff resources, support their growth and demonstrate commitment to employees’ careers through a mentoring program and crosstraining assignments.

Strategy 12: Increase staff efficiency and responsiveness by improving the design of, and access to, selfservice options.

BACKGROUND
The Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program was established in the 2022 Budget Act (Assembly Bill 178, chapter 45, statutes of 2022). The grant provided $50 million for city and county law enforcement agencies for the purpose of improving officer wellness and expanding mental health resources. The funding may be used to establish a wellness program and/or enhance an existing wellness program. The funds may be used to purchase equipment, pay for mental and physical health services, and other items that may be associated with wellness services.

City Council/RSA Agenda 53 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

DISCUSSION
The funds from the Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program will enable the police department to enhance the many facets of its Wellness Program. The funds will be used to purchase equipment for the police department’s exercise facility, and to create a digital profile of the department’s wellness program making it readily accessible for employees. Research will be conducted on wellness applications such as “Cordico,” and others, to identify the most appropriate and efficient program best suited for our department. Funds may also be used to provide training on the importance of mentaland physical health.

Management staff believes the Police Department’s employees, and the community, will greatly benefit from the acceptance of this grant as studies show there is a direct correlation between healthy employees and the services they provide to the community.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the general fund. The Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program is funded by the BSCC and the funds have already been allocated for the Union City Police Department.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Counciladopt a resolution:

1. Authorizing the acceptance of the Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program funds in the amount of $47,039.54; and

2. Amending the FY 2022-2023 Police Department Grants Fund budget by increasing the revenue projection in Account Number 2190-21523-44171 (PD Grants Fund – 2022-2023 Officer Wellness and Mental Health – Miscellaneous State Grants OWMH AB 178) by $47,039.54; and

3. Amending the FY 2022-2023 PD Grants Fund budget by appropriating the funds as follows: $25,498.30 to Account Number 2190-2102-21523-54111 (Professional/Consulting), $3,541.24 to Account Number 2190- 2103-21523-54110 (Professional/ Consulting), and $18,000.00 to Account Number 2190-2102-21523-57130 (Other Equipment); and

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all agreements necessary to accept the grant, in a form approved by the City Attorney, and take any other such action necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution; and

5. Authorizing the use of the grant funds, as necessary, to improve the Police Department’s Wellness Program.

Prepared by:

Lieutenant Yousuf Shansab
Submitted by:

Captain Victor Derting
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
City Council/RSA Agenda 54 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Resolution Wellness Grant Resolution
City Council/RSA Agenda 55 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFICER WELLNESS AND MENTAL HEALTH GRANT (AB 178), IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,039.54, AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 PD GRANTS FUND BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Union City Police Department did not apply for but received grant funds from the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) for the implementation and/ or improvement of a police wellness program; and
WHEREAS, the Union City Police Department received $47,039.54 in grant funding to support the department’s wellness program; and
WHEREAS, the funds will be used in the fiscal year 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 in accordance with the requirements outlined in the grant; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires for the city to accept the grant.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to accept the Officer Wellness and Mental Health Grant Program funds in the amount of $47,039.54.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby amends the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 PD Grants Fund budget by increasing the revenue projection in Account Number 2190-21523-44171 (PD Grants Fund – 2022-2023 Officer Wellness and Mental Health – Miscellaneous State Grants OWMH AB 178); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby amends the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 PD Grants Fund budget by appropriating the funds as follows: $25,498.30 to Account Number 2190-2102-21523-54111 (Professional/Consulting), $3,541.24 to Account Number 2190-2103-21523-54110 (Professional/Consulting), and $18,000.00 to Account Number 2190-2102-21523-57130 (Other Equipment), to be used to support the Officer Wellness Program; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or her designee, is hereby authorized to execute all agreements necessary to accept the grant, in a form approved by the City Attorney, and take any other such action necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on the 13
th day of June 2023, by the following vote:

City Council/RSA Agenda 56 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Resolution No. XXXX-23

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

CAROL DUTRA-VERNACI
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________ ___________________________
ANNA M. BROWN KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Clerk City Attorney
City Council/RSA Agenda 57 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 6/13/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARILOU AYUPAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITYACT OF 2017
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution approving a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This is an efficiency and safety improving project and is in alignment with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill (SB) 1 (Beall, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), which is known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. In order to raise funds to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local streets and roads systems, SB 1 increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, increased diesel fuel sales taxes, and increased vehicle registration fees. It also provides adjustments to tax rates in future years.

As of November 1, 2017, the State Controller began depositing various portions of these funds into the Road Maintenance and Repair Account (RMRA). A percentage of these are to be apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties, pursuant to Streets and Highway Code (SHC) Section 2032(h), and are intended for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system.

SB 1 is projected to generate about $1,731,331 in FY 2023-2024 for the City’s share of the Local Streets and Roads (LSR) Program which will be deposited into Union City’s SB 1 RMRA Account (Fund 2515) for the maintenance of the City’s local street and transportation systems.

City Council/RSA Agenda 58 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has set a deadline of July 1, 2023, for the recipients of SB 1 grants to submit a City Council-approved list of projects nominated for funding in FY 2023-2024. Per Streets and Highways Code Section 2034, cities must adopt their project lists by resolution and may not use adopted budgets to apply for SB 1 funding.

Adopted project lists shallcomply with the goals of the SB 1 legislation in maintaining state and local transportation systems. SB 1 is planned to invest $5.4 billion annually over the next decade to fix California’s transportation system and will address a backlog of repairs and upgrades while ensuring a cleaner and more sustainable travel network for the future.

DISCUSSION
SB 1 funding will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible.

SB 1 will also help the City maintain and rehabilitate major arterial roads throughout the City, maintain sidewalks, streetlights and traffic signals in a safe condition, upgrade traffic signals, streetlights, and street signs, and implement active transportation infrastructure throughout the City.

The List of Projects proposed to be funded by SB 1 revenues, which are projected to be $1,731.331 for Fiscal Year 2023-2024, are noted below.

1. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded, in-part, with Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues:

Project Title: Decoto Road Rehabilitation, Phase 1 Project, City Project No. 23-24 Project Description: The project will make repairs to the roadway surface along Decoto Rd., implement Class II buffered bike lanes, make improvements to bike and pedestrian safety, and update ADA access where necessary.

Project Location: Decoto Road from Fremont City Limits to Station Way (BART Station) Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) - Completion (11/24) based on component being funded with RMRA funds.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 10 years
Project Title:Alvarado-Niles Road Multimodal Study, City Project No. 23-25 Project Description: Alvarado-Niles Road is a major transportation corridor within Union City used by automobiles, transit, bicycles and pedestrians enroute to jobs, schools and neighborhoods.

It is a major transit route serving UC Transit and AC Transit. This corridor has minimum facilities for bikes and pedestrians with existing Class II bike lanes and 5-foot sidewalk. This project will consider how to enhance all modes of transportation along the corridor.

Project Location:Alvarado-Niles Road between I-880 and Decoto Road Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) -Completion (12/25) based on component being funded with RMRA funds.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years

2. The following previously adopted project may utilize Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in its delivery. With the relisting of this project in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund this project with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Title: Annual Citywide Pavement Rehab Project, City Project No. 23-01 Project Description: This annual project will restore the City's surface pavement along its roadway network. Based on Pavement Condition Index (PCI) assessments through the City's latest Pavement Management Plan (PMP), staff will direct a specific number of streets and roadways to be repaired using several different methods that willcover light maintenance, heavy maintenance, light rehab, heavy City Council/RSA Agenda 59 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
rehab, and reconstruction.

Project Location: Citywide
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) - Completion (12/24) based on component being funded with RMRA funds.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years
Project Title: Union City Boulevard Bike Lanes Project, City Project No. 17-29 (includes pavement rehabilitation)
Project Description: The project proposes to widen Union City Blvd. (UCB) to accommodate a buffer Class II in each direction by reconstructing the median island and rehabilitate/overlay the existing pavement before implementing the new bikeway facilities including Complete Streets improvements. Other improvements include traffic signals, streetlights, signage/striping and landscaped medians. When completed, the UCB will serve as Union City’s segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail
Project Location: UCB between Smith Street and southern City limits (approximately two miles) Estimated Project Schedule: Start 07/23 and Completion by 07/25 based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimate Project Useful Life: 10 Years
Project Title: Street Sweeper Replacement Project # 22-23 Project Description: Replacement existing 12-year old sweeper with modern single engine sweeper that reduces the City’s current carbon foot print. The existing sweeper needs to be replaced because of higher maintenance cost and reliability issues, including challenges in finding replacement parts and passing Opacity inspections.

Project Location: Citywide
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/22) -Completion (11/24) based on manufacturer schedule.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 10 years
Project Title: Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04 Project Description: Construct a new four-lane multimodalcorridor, parallel to Decoto Road from Old Alameda Creek to Mission Blvd with landscape median, buffer bike lanes and separated Class I bikeway/trail. Creates a new access roadway into Union City BART Station and 100-acre TOD site/Station District area. New intersections at Alvarado-Niles Road, 11th Street and 7th Street, realign Quarry Lakes Drive closer to Old Alameda Creek.

Project Location: Southern city limits
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (07/23) -Completion (12/25) based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 15 years
Project Title: Citywide Streetlight LED Conversion Project, City Project No. 22-16 Project Description: This proposes to convert existing High-Pressure Sodium (HPS) streetlight to energy-efficient LED streetlight with the city limits. There are approximately 4,000 streetlights throughout the city and this project willalso evaluate the required illumination level of these existing streetlights.

Project Location: Citywide
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) -Completion (12/25) based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years
Project Title: BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing, City Project No. 14-14 Project Description: Construct a new pedestrian at-grade (Oakland Sub) crossing to make a new east entrance to Union City BART. Also, improve Decoto Road at-grade crossing and close I Street at-grade (Oakland Sub). Improve other distance at-grade crossings (Coast Sub/Oakland Sub/Niles City Council/RSA Agenda 60 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Sub)
Project Location:east of Union City BART Station
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/22) -Completion (12/23) based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years
The List of Projects will also include funding from a combination of Measure B, BB, VRF, Allied Waste fees, State Gas Tax and Alameda CTC funding grants. SB 1 funds provide additional revenues and capacity to fund other local street and road projects. These projects willcomply with the goals of the SB 1 legislation in maintaining state and local transportation systems.

FISCAL IMPACT
SB 1 is projected to generate approximately $1,731,331 for FY 2023-2024 from the LSR Program which will be deposited into the Union City RMRA Account (Fund 2515) to fund the rehabilitation of local streets and roads.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution approving a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Prepared by:

Trieu Tran, Civil Engineer III
Submitted by:

Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Attachment 1 - LSRRevenues Attachment
Resolution Resolution
City Council/RSA Agenda 61 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
CaliforniaCityFinance.com Updated January 12, 2023
The California Local Government Finance Almanac
Shared Revenue Estimates: State Revenue Allocations to Cities and Counties Local Streets and Roads Estimates: 2022-23, 2023-24
Including Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
The state of California imposes per-gallon excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel and registration taxes on motor vehicles with allocations dedicated to transportation purposes.1 The
local (city and county) portions of these allocations flow through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), the familiar gasoline tax revenues that have been in place for decades, and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which allocates much of the revenue from the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall).

State taxes transferred to and allocated through the state Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) include:
 The per gallon “gasoline tax” and “diesel fuel tax” imposed on the use of vehicle fuels.  The “use fuel tax,” imposed on vendors and users of motor vehicle fuels that are not taxed under either the gasoline or diesel fuel tax, such as liquefied petroleum gas, ethanol, methanol and natural gas (both liquid and gaseous) for use on state highways. Use Fuel Tax rates vary depending on the type of fuel.  Variable rate per gallon gasoline diesel fuel excise taxes imposed in 2010-11 in a complicated arrangement known as the “fuel tax swap.” This rate replaced the previous Proposition 42 sales tax on gasoline.

Transportation taxes allocated to cities and counties through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) include:
 An additional 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
 An additional 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with half of the revenues going to the state Trade Corridor Enhancement Account (TCEA) and half to the RMRA. Annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.  An additional vehicle registration tax called the “Transportation Improvement Fee” with rates based on the value of the motor vehicle effective January 1, 2018 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
 An additional $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emissions vehicles of model year 2020 or later effective July 1, 2020 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2021.

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) also adopted annual inflationary adjustments beginning July 1, 2020 to all per-gallon motor vehicle fuel excise taxes including the rates allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA).

1 Taxes on aircraft jet fuel are transferred to the state Aeronautics Account. 2217 Isle Royale Lane • Davis, CA • 95616-6616 • Tel 530.758.3952 City Council/RSA Agenda 62 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2103-2108 “HUTA” Cities and counties receive revenue from the motor vehicle fuel taxes imposed pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7360(a) and (b) through the Highway User Tax Account under the following formulas outlined in the Streets and Highways code and illustrated in Figure 1.

Section 2104. Section 2104 allocates funds to counties with designated allotments for engineering and administration, snow removal, heavy rainfall / storm damage as well as county streets, roads and public mass transit guideways and facilities.

Section 2105. Section 2105(a) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among counties based on population.

Section 2105(b) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among cities based on population.

Section 2106. Revenues equal to 1.04 cents per gallon are allocated as follows:
a. $7.2 million per year to the State Bicycle Transportation Account. b. $400 per month to each city ($2,308,800 per year among the 481 eligible cities2) c. $800 per month to each county ($556,800 per year among the 58 counties) d. The residual amount to each county and the cities in that county based on registered vehicles. In each county, from this amount, the county receives an allotment based on the share of assessed value of the county which is in the unincorporated area. The remainder is allocated to the cities within the county based on population.
2 The city of Rolling Hills has only private streets and is therefor not eligible to receive these allocations.

City Council/RSA Agenda 63 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Section 2107. This section provides monthly allocations to cities of 1.315 cents per gallon of gasoline, 1.8 cents per gallon of diesel, and 2.59 cents per liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as follows. a. Each city with snow removal costs in excess of $5,000 is allocated 50 percent of the cost exceeding $5,000.
b. The remainder is allocated to cities based on population.

Section 2107.5. These funds (about $2.7 million per year) are allocated to cities annually in July based on population as follows:

Section 2107.5 funds must be used for engineering costs and administrative expenses related to city streets. Cities with populations under 10,000 may also expend the moneys for street construction or acquisition of street rights-of-way.

Section 2103 HUTA and the 2010 Gasoline Sales Tax – Excise Tax Swap In March 2010 as a part of a special budget session called by Governor Schwarzenegger, the Legislature enacted a swap of state sales taxes on gasoline for a gasoline excise tax. Intended to be “revenue neutral,” the fuel tax swap provided the Legislature with greater flexibility in the use of funds, in particular relieving the general fund from the cost of state transportation debt service payments. The fuel tax swap:

1. Repealed the state sales tax on gasoline (local rates including the Bradley Burns are NOT affected);

2. Increased the excise tax on gasoline by 17.322 cents and added an annual adjustment mechanism intended to ensure the new excise tax provides, over time, the same amount of revenues expected from the sales tax on gas (no more, no less);

3. Increased the sales tax on diesel by 1.75 percent and allocated 75 percent to local transit agencies and 25 percent to state transit programs. The excise tax on diesel was reduced from 18 cents to 13.6 cents.

Sales tax revenues from diesel must go to transit funding.

4. Provided for a specific allocation of the funds among state and local transportation needs.

Revenues from the new Section 2103 excise tax rate are now allocated as follows:

1. State transportation debt service;

2. Remainder allocated:
a. 44 percent to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); b. 12 percent State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP); c. 44 percent evenly split between cities and counties using current HUTA formulas.

Section 2103 funds are allocated to cities on a per capita basis and to counties 75 percent based on the proportion of registered vehicles and 25 percent based on the proportion of maintained county road miles.

City Population Annual Allocation
over 500,000 $ 20,000
100,000 to 500,000 $ 10,000
50,000 to 99.999 $ 7,500
25,000 to 49,999 $ 6,000
20,000 to 24,999 $ 5,000
15,000 to 19,999 $ 4,000
10,000 to 14,999 $ 3,000
5,000 to 9,999 $ 2,000
less than 5,000 $ 1,000
Streets & Highway Code §2107.5
City Council/RSA Agenda 64 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
The law included expressed legislative intent to fully replace the local streets and road funds cities and counties would have received under Proposition 42 state sales tax on gasoline with allocations from the new higher motor vehicle excise tax (HUTA) rate.

However, the swap created certain revenue effects related to the timing and receipt of revenues. In particular, the law provided that the new excise tax rate be adjusted annually by the BOE to garner an amount of revenues equal to what Prop42 would have provided in the prior year. Thus, the annual Sec 2103 funds were always “looking backward.” If the Section 2103 amounts generated less than Prop42 would have, the difference was made up until the following year.

In the years following the swap, there were a number of snafus and changes in interpretation of the Section 2103 allocation. In FY2011-12 SCO allocated more money to cities and counties and did not fully backfill state transportation programs for weight fees that were used for debt service and loans that those funds would have otherwise received. This was contrary to the Legislature’s intention, but the statute was not clear. The statute was clarified in the 2013 budget to clarify the original intent of the weight fee swap to fully backfill state transportation funds. [Streets & Highways Code 2103 (a)(1)(D)].

The Section 2103 Local Streets and Roads allocation to cities and counties have varied and declined dramatically and, due to BOE’s failure to enact a rate increase in 2018, fell to $244 million for FY2018-19, about 5 percent down from prior year.

Changes to HUTA Allocated Rates, Including the Variable Rate by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall)
In addition to increasing various fuel and motor vehicle registration taxes, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) removed BOE’s discretionary rate setting role over the Section 2103 variable rate and reset the variable rate at 17.3 cents per gallon on July 1, 2019, up from the current 11.7 cents. This adjustment more than doubled Section 2103 revenue allocations for FY2019-20 over the prior year.

With regard to diesel fuel taxes, SB1 also eliminated the price-based adjustment mechanism applied to the diesel fuel tax rate.

On July 1, 2020, and every July 1 thereafter, the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax rates including the 18 cent per gallon base rate, the 17.3 percent per gallon rate, the diesel fuel excise tax rate and vehicle registration taxes are increased by the change in the California Consumer Price Index.

Streets & Highways Code Section 2103 Variable Gas Tax Allocations to Cities and Counties City Council/RSA Agenda 65 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Rates effective July 1, 2023
Effective Date Base Rate Sec2103 SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2010 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.353
July 1, 2011 $ 0.180 $ 0.177 $ 0.357
July 1, 2012 $ 0.180 $ 0.180 $ 0.360
July 1, 2013 $ 0.180 $ 0.215 $ 0.395
July 1, 2014 $ 0.180 $ 0.180 $ 0.360
July 1, 2015 $ 0.180 $ 0.120 $ 0.300
July 1, 2016 $ 0.180 $ 0.098 $ 0.278
July 1, 2017 $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.297
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.120 $ 0.417
July 1, 2019 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.120 $ 0.473
July 1, 2020 $ 0.192 $ 0.185 $ 0.128 $ 0.505
July 1, 2021 $ 0.194 $ 0.187 $ 0.130 $ 0.511
July 1, 2022 $ 0.205 $ 0.197 $ 0.137 $ 0.539
July 1, 2023 est $ 0.221 $ 0.213 $ 0.148 $ 0.582
California Gasoline Excise Tax Rates - Per Gallon
Effective Date Base Rate SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2017 $ 0.160 $ 0.160
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2019 $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2020 $ 0.171 $ 0.214 $ 0.385
July 1, 2021 $ 0.173 $ 0.216 $ 0.389
July 1, 2022 $ 0.183 $ 0.228 $ 0.411
July 1, 2023 est $ 0.197 $ 0.246 $ 0.443
California Diesel Excise Tax Rates
Wt Fees ~$1.7 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C)
22%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(C)
56%
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(3)(A-B)

51.2%
Str&Hw ys §2108

22.6% (i)
Str&Hw ys §2104

14.6% (i)
Str&Hw ys §2107
Counties (iv)
Cities (v)
State
Highway
Account
Allocation of Gasoline Excise Tax Revenues

58.2¢
Per Gal 11.05¢
§2105

11.05¢
§2104, §2106,
§2107,§2108
77% (iii) Str&Hw ys §2105

11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105b

11.5% Str&Hw ys §2105a

11.5% (i),(ii)
Str&Hw ys §2106
(i) The 4.39¢ local share of diesel fuel tax is allocated 1.8¢ to counties and 2.59¢ to cities. (ii) Str&Hw y Code §2106 funds are distributed based on registered vehicles, assessed property valuation, and population.
(iii) A portion of funds in State Highw ay Account is allocated among counties and cities for Regional Transportation Improvement Programs.
(iv) County apportionments are based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage.
(v) City apportionments are based on population.
(vi) Beginning July 1, 2020 and annually thereafter, these rates are subject to an annual cost-of-living adjustment.

Cities and
Counties

21.3¢
§2103
Transportation
Debt Service
(State General
Remainder to...

Wt Fee Offset ~$1.2 billion
Str&Hw ys §2103(a)(1)

14.8¢
§2036
Road
Maint.
and
Rehab.

Account
Rev&Tax §7360(a)
Rev&Tax §7360(b)
Rev&Tax §7360(c)
Highway Users Tax Acount
City Council/RSA Agenda 66 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Use of Funds: HUTA
The use of local Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds is restricted by Article XIX of the California State Constitution and by Streets and Highways Code Section 2101. All Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds allocated from the Highway Users Tax Account must be expended for the following:
(a) The research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (and their related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes. (b) The research and planning for exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
(c) The construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes, and the maintenance of the structures and the immediate right-of-way for the public mass transit guideways. (d) The payment of principal and interest on voter-approved bonds issued for the purposes specified above.

Three Year State General Fund TCRF Loan Repayment Funds SB1 stipulated the repayment of $706 million by the state General Fund to transportation funds over three fiscal years: 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. Under SB1, $75 million was allocated to local streets and roads from repayments of Transportation Congestion Relief Funds (TCRF) in each of these three years. These funds were allocated half to cities and half to counties with the city funds allocated among cities on a per capita basis, the county funds allocated among counties based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage.

These TCRF revenues may be deposited in local HUTA funds.3 However, these TCRF funds carry slightly different
use requirements than HUTA funds. TCRF funds may be expended only for street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction or storm damage repair. For these purposes,  “Maintenance” means patching and/or overlay and sealing.  “Reconstruction” includes any overlay, sealing or widening of the roadway, if the widening is necessary to bring the roadway width to the state minimum standards, but does not include widening for the purpose of traffic capacity.
 “Storm damage repair” is repair or reconstruction of local streets and highways and related drainage improvements that have been damaged due to winter storms and flooding, and construction of drainage improvements to mitigate future roadway flooding and damage problems, in those jurisdictions that have been declared disaster areas by the President of the United States. 3 Note that the “loan repayment” is between the state general fund and state transportation funds. From an accounting standpoint this is NOT a debt repayment to local agencies, it is simply revenue.

City Council/RSA Agenda 67 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2031 “RMRA” The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) represented a significant additional investment in California’s transportation systems of over $5 billion per year. The Act increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabilized the problematic price-based fuel tax rates and provided for inflationary adjustments to rates in future years. The Act is more than doubling local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which it established.

The RMRA receives funds4
from the following new taxes imposed under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017:
 A 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017.  A 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017, half of which will be allocated to Trade Corridors Enhancement Account (TCEA) with the remaining half to the RMRA.  A new vehicle registration tax called the “transportation improvement fee,” effective January 1, 2018, based on the market value of the vehicle.
 An additional new $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emission vehicles model year 2020 and later effective July 1, 2020.
 Annual rate increases to these taxes every July 1 (January 1 for the registration fees) for the change in the California Consumer Price Index. The first adjustment made on July 1, 2020 covered CPI change for two years: November 1, 2017 through November 12, 2019.
4 In addition, funds from a 4 percent increase in the diesel sales tax to 5.75 percent from the prior 1.75 percent effective November 1, 2017 are allocated to the Public Transportation Account.

Vehicle Value Jan 2018 Jan 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jan 2023 0 - $4,999 $ 25 $ 27 $ 27 $ 28 $ 29
$5,000 - $24,999 $ 52 $ 54 $ 55 $ 56 $ 59
$25,000 - $34,999 $ 105 $ 107 $ 110 $ 112 $ 118
$35,000 - $59,999 $ 157 $ 161 $ 165 $ 168 $ 177
$60,000 & over $ 183 $ 188 $ 192 $ 196 $ 206
July 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jan 2023
ZEV vehicle* $ 100 $ 101 $ 103 $ 108
*2020 or later models
SB1 Transportation Improvement Fee
SB1 Road Improvement Fee (ZEV)
City Council/RSA Agenda 68 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
The Road Repair and Accountability Act directs the State Controller to allocate, on a monthly basis, fifty percent of the revenues in the RMRA to the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOP) in the State Highway Account and half to cities and counties. But there are a series of specific program allocations, subject to appropriation in the annual state budget, to be taken out first:

1. Administrative costs.

2. $200 million for the State-Local-Partnership Program for existing and aspiring self-help jurisdictions.

3. $100 million annually for the Active Transportation Program for the purpose of encouraging increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking.

4. $400 million for state bridge and culvert maintenance and rehabilitation.

5. $25 million for the state’s Freeway Service Patrol program.

6. $5 million for five years through FY 2021-22 for pre-apprenticeship training programs of the California Workforce Development Board.

7. $25 million for local planning grants to encourage local and regional planning.

8. $7 million for transportation research and transportation-related workforce education, training, and development including $5 million to the University of California and $2 million to the California State University.

City Council/RSA Agenda 69 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Use of Funds: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Section 2030] The use of RMRA local streets and roads funds is similar but, not identical, to HUTA use rules. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2030, RMRA local streets and roads allocations must be used for projects “that include, but are not limited to,” the following
 Road maintenance and rehabilitation
 Safety projects
 Railroad grade separations
 Traffic control devices
 Complete street components, “including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project.”
RMRA funds may also be used to satisfy a match requirement for projects eligible for state or federal funds.

SB1 also contains non-obligatory intent language regarding the use of funds. “To the extent possible and cost effective,” cities and counties are to use a use:
 advanced recycling techniques that reduce greenhouse gas emissions;  automotive technologies, ZEV fueling, infrastructure-to-vehicle;  communications autonomous vehicle systems;
City Council/RSA Agenda 70 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
 resiliency re climate change, fires, floods, sea level rise; and  complete street elements, access for bicycles, pedestrians.

If a city or county has an average Pavement Condition Index that meets or exceeds 80, the city or county may spend its RMRA funds on transportation priorities other than these. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2037] Maintenance of Effort: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2036] The Road Repair and Accountability Act contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The Act states that the MOE requirement is to ensure that these new roads funds do not supplant existing levels of city and county general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE for the receipt of RMRA funds state that a city or county must maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than average of 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 years. In making this calculation an agency may exclude one-time funds. A city or county that fails to comply in a particular year may make it up with in additional expenditures in the following year.

The Act provides that the State Controller may perform audits to ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State Controller determines that a city or county has not met its MOE, the agency will be required to reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. However, a city or county that fails to comply in a particular fiscal year may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.

For further guidance, see the State Controller’s “Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties.”
Spending Plans and Reports: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034] The Road Repair and Accountability Act stipulates that, prior to receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project: description, location, schedule, useful life. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034(a)]
The Road Repair and Accountability Act also requires that a city or county submit to the CTC an annual report of project completion in order to receive RMRA funds. The report must include descriptions of all projects for which RMRA funds were expended including: description, location, funds expended, completion date, estimated useful life of the project.

There are no additional use or reporting requirements on Highway Users Tax Account funds (Streets and Highways Code Sec 2103-2107) or on the three year transportation loan repayment funds.

Budgeting and Accounting for RMRA Funds: The ~60 Day Delay The allocation of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues to cities and counties takes many weeks. It takes the State Controller’s Office roughly 30 to 60 days from the time of revenue collection by the state, through the various statutory set asides to distribute the funds to cities and counties in monthly allocations. Consequently, the estimates shown in this report are for revenues collected for July through June are not received on a cash basis by local agencies until September through August. That is, for example, the FY2022-23 figure for your agency is revenues collected in and for July 2022 through June 2023 but distributed in City Council/RSA Agenda 71 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
monthly allocations September 2022 through August 2023. Cities and counties thus have two choices in the budgeting and accounting of RMRA revenues:
1) apply a 60 day accrual policy to RMRA funds (recommended); or 2) adjust RMRA budgets (especially in FY2017-18) to reflect a distributed cash basis.

Local Streets and Roads (HUTA and RMRA) Revenue Estimates for FY2022-23 and FY2023-24
We have computed revenue estimates for each city and county using a model reflecting the local allocation formulas, latest population figures used by the State Controller for allocations and estimates by the state Department of Finance (DOF) of statewide HUTA and RMRA tax revenues provided with the Governor’s Proposed 2023-24 Budget (released January 10, 2023) and analyses of SB1(Beall), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Fuel consumption was sharply down during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic but has largely recovered to its prior, slightly declining trajectory. Recently, fuel prices have increased steeply but the price of fuel no longer has a direct effect on local streets and roads revenues because all rates are per gallon, regardless of price.

Despite lower fuel consumption, scheduled rate increases stipulated in SB1 have kept local allocations of revenue growing at a modest pace. Total 2020-21 LSR allocations (including HUTA, TCRF, and RMRA) were 2.8 percent above 2019-20. Allocations in 2021-22 were 8.1 percent up from 2020-21. For the current year FY2022-23, the Department of Finance projects total LSR allocations to cities and counties will be 8.4 percent above the prior year. For the budget year FY2023-24, DOF estimates total local streets and roads allocations will grow 12.3 percent.

City Council/RSA Agenda 72 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
HUTA (Highway Users Tax Account)
Revenues allocated to cities and counties through HUTA under Sections 2103-2107 of the Streets and Highways Code are derived from per gallon rates. As described above, these rates are adjusted annually on July

1. Revenue changes depend on the combined effects of 1) these rate adjustments, 2) taxable gallonage, and 3) the relative change of statutory transfers including the “weight fee offset” that pays state transportation bond debt.

Statewide fuel consumption (gallons) had been relatively flat in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions caused a steep decline in fuel consumption in the spring of 2020. The effects of this are expected to ease up gradually as restrictions are lifted and travel resumes. Sec2104-2108 HUTA allocations (not including RMRA or the sec2103 variable fuel taxes) dropped 6.5 percent in 2019-20 from the prior 2018- 19 year. But this drop-off was more than offset by the doubling of the Sec2103 allocations due to the reset of the formerly price-based rate. FY2019-20 contained the most dramatic fiscal and economic effects of the pandemic, those during the months of April through June 2020.

With a recovery in fuel consumption as the COVID effects eased and with additional rate adjustments kicking in each July 1, total HUTA revenue grew 8.3 percent in FY 2021-22. DOF estimates 9.0 percent growth in current year FY2022-23 and 10.9 percent growth in budget year FY2023-24.

RMRA (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account)5
The Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1) taxes that provide funding to cities and counties through the RMRA began on November 1, 2017 when the new per-gallon fuel excise taxes took effect. On January 1, 2018, the new vehicle registration tax, the “Transportation Improvement Fee,” took effect. Cities, counties and other recipients of these revenues saw the first full year of these revenues in FY2018-19. A $100 zero emission vehicle registration tax (“Road Improvement Fee”) began on July 1, 2020.

DOF now estimates FY2022-23 RMRA revenues will be 7.7 percent higher than FY2021-22 actuals and that FY2023-24 revenues will grow by 14.0 percent over the current year.

Why does city/county RMRA growth differ from city/county HUTA growth? Under SB1, various fixed-amount statutory allocations are made from the new SB1 tax rates prior to the city and county allocations.

Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
An individual city’s allocations will of course also be affected by change in the city’s population relative to the change in state population. Changes for allocations to counties will be affected other factors in the allocation rules including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles. 5 Note that RMRA revenues are delayed 60 days from collection to allocation. That is, the revenues for a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year are allocated September 1 through August 31. These are spendable in the fiscal year because your accounting staff “accrues” them back into your fiscal year.

City Council/RSA Agenda 73 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
California Local Streets and Roads Program - State Funds to Cities and Counties Looking Ahead: Long Term Estimates of Local Streets and Roads Funding With the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, we can expect stable, modest year over year growth in local streets and roads revenues in future years. While fuel consumption may remain flat or in slight decline, annual cost of living adjustments will help to maintain revenues.

Due to complicated statutory transfers from these revenues before the city and county allocations are made (including the $1.7 billion transfer for state transportation debt service), actual growth in funding allocated to cities and counties varies somewhat among the various categories of local streets and roads allocations and will not exactly mirror total tax collections. Taking all these factors into account, for the purposes of long-term transportation program planning, we estimate transportation allocations to cities and counties will increase in outyears at the following growth rates:
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 FY24-25 FY25-26 Millions
§2103
cities&counties
§2104
counties
§2106
§2107
cities
estimated projected >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Road
Maintenance
&
Rehabilitation
Account TCRF loan
repayment
H.U.T.A.
§2105
cities&counties
Estimated Annual Revenue Growth Rate over prior year
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Beyond
HUTA 2103 3.6% -0.1% 0.0% 1.2%
HUTA 2104 1.4% 1.1% 0.6% 1.0%
HUTA 2105 1.4% 1.1% 0.6% 1.0%
HUTA 2106 county 1.2% 0.8% 0.3% 0.8%
HUTA 2106 city 1.5% 1.2% 0.7% 1.1%
HUTA 2107 1.4% 1.1% 0.6% 1.0%
RMRA 6.9% 6.2% 6.7% 6.6%
City Council/RSA Agenda 74 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

CaliforniaCityFinance.com
Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
Allocations to each particular city also will be affected by annual changes in the city’s population relative to the change in state population in cities. The current forecast for California population, provided by the Demographics Unit of the California Department of Finance is as follows:6 If you think your city’s population growth will be significantly different from the statewide average in cities, then you should adjust accordingly. For example, the City of Agartha’s planning department estimates the city will see average annual residential population growth of 1.5 percent annually over the next ten years. The city’s estimated HUTA 2105 allocation for FY2023-24 is $381,200. The long term projection of Section 2105 revenue would be:
$381,200 x Sec2105 growth x Agartha Population Growth ÷ Statewide City Population Growth So, for 2024-25, the city would estimate $381,200 x 1.014 x 1.015 ÷ 1.0055 = $390,189 And long term …
Changes for allocations to counties will be affected by other factors in the allocation rules, including relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles. mjgc
ATTACHMENTS:

A) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2022-23 B) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2023-24 C) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2022-23 (from CSAC) D) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2023-24 (from CSAC) 6 See http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/projections/ . California population in cities estimated by author based on recent historic trend of proportion of population in cities.

California 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Population 39,185,605 39,388,838 39,593,125 39,798,472 40,004,883 40,212,365 40,420,923 40,630,563 Population in Cities 32,713,003 32,892,492 33,072,965 33,254,428 33,436,888 33,620,348 33,804,815 33,990,294 percent change 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036
Population 40,825,471 41,011,197 41,197,768 41,385,188 41,573,460 41,762,589 41,952,578 Population in Cities 34,163,552 34,329,226 34,495,703 34,662,987 34,831,083 34,999,994 35,169,724 percent change 0.51% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 0.48% 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 HUTA Sec2015 381,200 $
2105 growth 1.4% 1.1% 0.6% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
Agartha pop 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%
Cities pop 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55%
HUTA Sec2015 390,189 $ 398,208 $ 404,382 $ 412,421 $ 420,619 $ 428,981 $ City Council/RSA Agenda 75 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 475,563 676,528 266,105 569,692 7,500 1,995,388 1,709,359 3,704,746 ALBANY 135,280 192,448 79,132 162,057 4,000 572,916 486,250 1,059,167 BERKELEY 765,347 1,088,771 425,331 916,835 10,000 3,206,284 2,750,958 5,957,242 DUBLIN 447,783 637,008 250,841 536,414 7,500 1,879,545 1,609,506 3,489,051 EMERYVILLE 76,564 108,919 46,869 91,719 3,000 327,072 275,202 602,274 FREMONT 1,387,335 1,973,600 767,092 1,661,934 10,000 5,799,961 4,986,625 10,786,586 HAYWARD 989,350 1,407,433 548,413 1,185,175 10,000 4,140,372 3,556,112 7,696,484 LIVERMORE 529,138 752,743 295,543 633,872 7,500 2,218,795 1,901,928 4,120,723 NEWARK 286,092 406,990 161,997 342,719 6,000 1,203,798 1,028,326 2,232,124 OAKLAND 2,613,552 3,717,997 1,440,855 3,130,861 10,000 10,913,265 9,394,131 20,307,396 PIEDMONT 67,936 96,644 42,128 81,383 3,000 291,091 244,188 535,279 PLEASANTON 481,150 684,476 269,175 576,386 7,500 2,018,687 1,729,442 3,748,129 SAN LEANDRO 548,193 779,850 306,013 656,698 7,500 2,298,254 1,970,420 4,268,674 UNION CITY 422,597 601,180 237,002 506,243 7,500 1,774,522 1,518,979 3,293,501

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,207 1,717 5,621 1,446 1,000 10,990 4,338 15,328 IONE 53,629 76,292 41,293 64,244 2,000 237,459 192,765 430,224 JACKSON 30,598 43,528 25,621 36,654 1,000 137,401 109,981 247,382 PLYMOUTH 6,450 9,176 9,189 7,727 1,000 33,542 23,185 56,727 SUTTER CREEK 15,948 22,687 15,652 19,104 1,000 74,390 57,322 131,712

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 11,845 16,850 12,239 14,189 1,000 56,122 42,574 98,696 CHICO 620,841 883,199 394,703 743,726 10,000 2,652,469 2,231,546 4,884,015 GRIDLEY 44,198 62,876 32,558 52,947 2,000 194,579 158,866 353,445 OROVILLE 120,262 171,083 80,327 144,066 4,000 519,737 432,268 952,006 PARADISE 46,491 66,138 33,998 88,109 6,000 240,736 167,108 407,844

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 22,030 31,339 28,708 26,390 1,000 109,468 79,184 188,651

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 38,514 54,790 18,768 46,138 2,000 160,210 138,436 298,646 WILLIAMS 33,567 47,751 16,974 40,211 2,000 140,502 120,652 261,154 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 76 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 695,873 989,937 417,996 833,609 10,000 2,947,416 2,501,240 5,448,655 BRENTWOOD 388,234 552,295 235,326 465,078 7,500 1,648,433 1,395,465 3,043,898 CLAYTON 66,759 94,971 44,440 79,973 3,000 289,143 239,959 529,102 CONCORD 757,612 1,077,766 454,656 907,568 10,000 3,207,602 2,723,154 5,930,756 DANVILLE 263,465 374,801 161,240 315,613 6,000 1,121,119 946,995 2,068,114 EL CERRITO 156,526 222,671 97,742 187,507 5,000 669,446 562,615 1,232,061 HERCULES 157,431 223,958 98,279 188,592 6,000 674,260 565,868 1,240,128 LAFAYETTE 153,400 218,225 95,886 183,763 6,000 657,274 551,380 1,208,654 MARTINEZ 226,495 322,208 139,288 271,326 6,000 965,317 814,111 1,779,429 MORAGA 104,218 148,258 66,683 124,846 4,000 448,005 374,599 822,604 OAKLEY 268,708 382,260 164,354 321,894 6,000 1,143,216 965,842 2,109,059 ORINDA 117,782 167,555 74,737 141,095 4,000 505,168 423,354 928,523 PINOLE 114,246 162,525 72,637 136,859 4,000 490,267 410,645 900,912 PITTSBURG 460,037 654,442 277,962 551,094 7,500 1,951,035 1,653,555 3,604,590 PLEASANT HILL 208,230 296,225 128,443 249,446 6,000 888,344 748,461 1,636,806 RICHMOND 699,294 994,804 420,028 837,708 10,000 2,961,834 2,513,537 5,475,371 SAN PABLO 194,316 276,431 120,181 232,778 6,000 829,706 698,448 1,528,154 SAN RAMON 510,439 726,142 307,889 611,471 7,500 2,163,441 1,834,717 3,998,157 WALNUT CREEK 424,202 603,463 256,683 508,166 7,500 1,800,014 1,524,748 3,324,762

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 40,717 57,923 24,952 48,776 2,000 174,368 146,352 320,721

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 65,233 92,799 65,274 78,144 3,000 304,450 234,472 538,922 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 129,277 183,907 124,647 1,200,053 5,000 1,642,882 464,671 2,107,553 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 77 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 746,184 1,061,509 377,039 893,878 10,000 3,088,609 2,682,076 5,770,685 COALINGA 109,015 155,082 59,183 130,592 4,000 457,872 391,841 849,714 FIREBAUGH 50,920 72,438 30,202 60,999 2,000 216,559 183,027 399,586 FOWLER 42,008 59,760 25,756 50,323 2,000 179,847 150,994 330,841 FRESNO 3,280,396 4,666,638 1,641,249 3,929,695 20,000 13,537,978 11,791,028 25,329,006 HURON 37,229 52,962 23,372 44,598 2,000 160,161 133,816 293,978 KERMAN 100,398 142,825 54,884 120,270 4,000 422,378 360,871 783,249 KINGSBURG 75,460 107,348 42,444 90,396 3,000 318,648 271,233 589,881 MENDOTA 75,949 108,044 42,688 90,982 3,000 320,662 272,990 593,652 ORANGE COVE 58,034 82,558 33,751 69,521 2,000 245,864 208,597 454,462 PARLIER 87,908 125,057 48,654 105,308 4,000 370,926 315,976 686,902 REEDLEY 150,739 214,439 79,997 180,575 6,000 631,751 541,816 1,173,567 SANGER 160,363 228,130 84,798 192,104 6,000 671,396 576,408 1,247,805 SAN JOAQUIN 22,319 31,751 15,934 26,737 1,000 97,742 80,225 177,967 SELMA 149,140 212,164 79,200 178,660 5,000 624,164 536,068 1,160,232

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 49,882 70,962 26,699 59,756 2,000 209,299 179,297 388,595 WILLOWS 38,780 55,168 21,825 46,456 2,000 164,228 139,390 303,618

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 112,182 159,589 76,528 134,387 4,000 486,687 403,228 889,914 BLUE LAKE 7,265 10,335 9,445 8,703 1,000 36,747 26,113 62,860 EUREKA 162,777 231,564 108,878 194,996 6,000 704,214 585,084 1,289,297 FERNDALE 8,405 11,957 10,174 10,069 1,000 41,606 30,212 71,817 FORTUNA 75,551 107,477 53,106 90,505 3,000 329,638 271,558 601,197 RIO DELL 20,437 29,073 17,867 24,482 1,000 92,859 73,458 166,317TRINIDAD 1,852 2,635 5,984 2,219 1,000 13,691 6,658 20,349

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 162,626 231,349 100,998 194,815 6,000 695,788 584,541 1,280,330 CALEXICO 233,657 332,397 143,016 279,906 6,000 994,975 839,855 1,834,831 CALIPATRIA 39,890 56,747 28,396 47,786 2,000 174,819 143,381 318,200 EL CENTRO 270,452 384,741 164,781 323,983 6,000 1,149,957 972,110 2,122,067 HOLTVILLE 33,579 47,769 24,663 40,225 2,000 148,235 120,695 268,930 IMPERIAL 129,808 184,662 81,585 155,501 4,000 555,556 466,579 1,022,135 WESTMORLAND 12,188 17,339 12,010 14,601 1,000 57,139 43,810 100,949

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 23,345 33,211 19,505 27,966 1,000 105,027 83,912 188,939 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 78 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 119,164 169,520 52,944 142,750 5,000 489,379 428,321 917,700 BAKERSFIELD 2,467,055 3,509,592 1,001,536 2,955,367 10,000 9,943,550 8,867,562 18,811,111 CALIFORNIA CITY 90,593 128,876 41,401 108,525 3,000 372,395 325,627 698,022 DELANO 311,211 442,724 130,535 372,810 7,500 1,264,780 1,118,614 2,383,394 MARICOPA 6,185 8,798 7,299 7,409 1,000 30,691 22,230 52,921 MCFARLAND 85,549 121,700 39,363 102,482 3,000 352,094 307,496 659,590 RIDGECREST 169,318 240,868 73,207 202,831 6,000 692,225 608,594 1,300,818 SHAFTER 123,611 175,847 54,741 148,077 5,000 507,276 444,305 951,581 TAFT 52,477 74,653 26,002 62,864 2,000 217,995 188,623 406,618 TEHACHAPI 78,815 112,121 36,643 94,415 3,000 324,994 283,292 608,285 WASCO 163,616 232,757 70,904 196,000 6,000 669,276 588,098 1,257,375

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 82,659 117,589 39,552 99,019 4,000 342,818 297,107 639,926 CORCORAN 133,030 189,246 60,729 159,361 5,000 547,365 478,161 1,025,526 HANFORD 351,771 500,424 152,693 421,398 7,500 1,433,786 1,264,403 2,698,189 LEMOORE 163,266 232,259 73,441 195,581 6,000 670,547 586,840 1,257,387

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 101,822 144,851 49,245 121,976 4,000 421,894 365,989 787,883 LAKEPORT 30,164 42,910 17,966 36,134 1,000 128,174 108,420 236,593

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 97,206 138,284 49,246 199,034 4,000 487,770 349,398 837,168

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 122,114 173,718 73,934 146,285 5,000 521,051 438,927 959,978 ALHAMBRA 498,498 709,155 287,022 597,167 7,500 2,099,341 1,791,796 3,891,136 ARCADIA 343,293 488,364 199,154 411,242 7,500 1,449,553 1,233,931 2,683,484ARTESIA 99,487 141,529 61,124 119,179 4,000 425,319 357,596 782,915AVALON 20,781 29,562 16,565 24,894 1,000 92,802 74,694 167,496 AZUSA 304,477 433,144 177,178 364,743 6,000 1,285,543 1,094,410 2,379,953 BALDWIN PARK 434,785 618,519 250,952 520,844 7,500 1,832,600 1,562,789 3,395,389BELL 206,022 293,083 121,438 246,800 6,000 873,344 740,523 1,613,867BELLFLOWER 475,955 677,086 274,259 570,162 7,500 2,004,962 1,710,768 3,715,730 BELL GARDENS 237,833 338,337 139,448 284,908 6,000 1,006,525 854,864 1,861,388 BEVERLY HILLS 197,363 280,766 116,536 236,428 6,000 837,093 709,401 1,546,494 BRADBURY 5,551 7,897 7,943 6,650 1,000 29,041 19,953 48,994 BURBANK 646,847 920,194 371,009 774,880 10,000 2,722,931 2,325,023 5,047,953 CALABASAS 140,180 199,418 84,162 167,926 5,000 596,685 503,861 1,100,547 CARSON 566,331 805,653 325,425 678,426 7,500 2,383,336 2,035,615 4,418,950 CERRITOS 297,930 423,831 173,472 356,901 6,000 1,258,134 1,070,878 2,329,012 CLAREMONT 225,958 321,444 132,725 270,682 6,000 956,809 812,181 1,768,990 COMMERCE 74,688 106,250 47,084 89,471 3,000 320,492 268,457 588,949 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 79 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL COMPTON 579,979 825,069 333,152 694,777 7,500 2,440,478 2,084,674 4,525,152 COVINA 309,630 440,475 180,096 370,916 6,000 1,307,117 1,112,932 2,420,049 CUDAHY 137,446 195,529 82,615 164,652 5,000 585,242 494,036 1,079,278 CULVER CITY 244,078 347,221 142,983 292,389 6,000 1,032,671 877,311 1,909,982 DIAMOND BAR 331,690 471,857 192,585 397,343 7,500 1,400,974 1,192,224 2,593,198 DOWNEY 687,570 978,126 394,064 823,663 10,000 2,893,424 2,471,397 5,364,820 DUARTE 130,797 186,070 78,850 156,686 5,000 557,403 470,136 1,027,539 EL MONTE 658,499 936,770 377,606 788,838 10,000 2,771,712 2,366,903 5,138,614 EL SEGUNDO 104,375 148,482 63,891 125,034 4,000 445,781 375,163 820,944 GARDENA 367,604 522,947 212,917 440,365 7,500 1,551,333 1,321,313 2,872,646 GLENDALE 1,182,375 1,682,027 674,196 1,416,406 10,000 4,965,004 4,249,919 9,214,923 GLENDORA 316,817 450,698 184,164 379,525 7,500 1,338,704 1,138,763 2,477,466 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 84,173 119,743 52,454 100,834 3,000 360,204 302,551 662,755 HAWTHORNE 531,087 755,515 305,472 636,206 7,500 2,235,781 1,908,934 4,144,714 HERMOSA BEACH 118,965 169,237 72,151 142,512 4,000 506,864 427,605 934,470 HIDDEN HILLS 10,487 14,919 10,737 12,563 1,000 49,705 37,694 87,399 HUNTINGTON PARK 330,176 469,702 191,727 395,528 7,500 1,394,634 1,186,780 2,581,414 INDUSTRY 2,643 3,760 6,296 3,166 1,000 16,865 9,499 26,364 INGLEWOOD 654,945 931,714 375,594 784,580 10,000 2,756,832 2,354,128 5,110,961 IRWINDALE 9,057 12,884 9,928 10,850 1,000 43,718 32,554 76,272 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 123,979 176,370 74,990 148,518 5,000 528,857 445,628 974,485 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 34,128 48,550 24,121 40,883 2,000 149,682 122,669 272,350 LAKEWOOD 496,693 706,588 286,000 595,006 7,500 2,091,787 1,785,311 3,877,098 LA MIRADA 297,152 422,724 173,031 355,968 6,000 1,254,875 1,068,081 2,322,956 LANCASTER 1,064,979 1,515,022 607,733 1,275,774 10,000 4,473,508 3,827,952 8,301,460 LA PUENTE 229,403 326,345 134,675 274,810 6,000 971,234 824,565 1,795,799 LA VERNE 198,467 282,336 117,161 237,751 6,000 841,716 713,370 1,555,085 LAWNDALE 191,806 272,860 113,390 229,771 6,000 813,827 689,426 1,503,252 LOMITA 126,332 179,718 76,322 151,337 5,000 538,709 454,087 992,796 LONG BEACH 2,800,796 3,984,368 1,590,457 3,355,167 10,000 11,740,788 10,067,160 21,807,948 LOS ANGELES 23,508,580 33,442,925 13,314,064 28,161,709 20,000 98,447,279 84,499,048 182,946,327 LYNWOOD 413,775 588,630 239,057 495,675 7,500 1,744,638 1,487,271 3,231,909 MALIBU 64,798 92,181 41,485 77,624 3,000 279,088 232,910 511,998 MANHATTAN BEACH 214,035 304,483 125,975 256,399 6,000 906,892 769,325 1,676,217 MAYWOOD 151,662 215,752 90,663 181,681 6,000 645,759 545,134 1,190,893 MONROVIA 228,450 324,989 134,136 273,668 6,000 967,242 821,138 1,788,381 MONTEBELLO 378,169 537,978 218,899 453,022 7,500 1,595,567 1,359,289 2,954,856 MONTEREY PARK 368,412 524,098 213,375 441,334 7,500 1,554,719 1,324,219 2,878,937 NORWALK 624,003 887,696 358,076 747,514 10,000 2,627,289 2,242,911 4,870,200PALMDALE 1,021,722 1,453,485 583,243 1,223,955 10,000 4,292,405 3,672,469 7,964,874 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 80,583 114,636 50,422 96,533 3,000 345,173 289,646 634,820 PARAMOUNT 322,712 459,084 187,502 386,587 7,500 1,363,385 1,159,952 2,523,337 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 80 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL PASADENA 843,468 1,199,904 482,325 1,010,419 10,000 3,546,117 3,031,756 6,577,872 PICO RIVERA 375,008 533,480 217,109 449,234 7,500 1,582,330 1,347,924 2,930,254 POMONA 918,657 1,306,866 524,893 1,100,490 10,000 3,860,906 3,302,013 7,162,918 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 255,403 363,333 149,395 305,956 6,000 1,080,088 918,020 1,998,107 REDONDO BEACH 423,834 602,939 244,751 507,725 7,500 1,786,749 1,523,425 3,310,175 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 50,015 71,151 33,116 59,915 2,000 216,196 179,774 395,970 ROSEMEAD 308,460 438,810 179,433 369,514 7,500 1,303,716 1,108,724 2,412,440 SAN DIMAS 210,837 299,933 124,164 252,569 6,000 893,503 757,830 1,651,333 SAN FERNANDO 142,690 202,988 85,583 170,933 6,000 608,194 512,883 1,121,078 SAN GABRIEL 238,116 338,740 139,608 285,247 6,000 1,007,712 855,883 1,863,595 SAN MARINO 75,732 107,735 47,675 90,721 3,000 324,863 272,209 597,072 SANTA CLARITA 1,381,856 1,965,806 787,131 1,655,371 10,000 5,800,164 4,966,932 10,767,096 SANTA FE SPRINGS 113,214 161,057 68,896 135,623 4,000 482,790 406,936 889,726 SANTA MONICA 563,151 801,129 323,625 674,617 7,500 2,370,022 2,024,185 4,394,208 SIERRA MADRE 67,453 95,958 42,988 80,804 3,000 290,203 242,453 532,656 SIGNAL HILL 70,977 100,971 44,983 85,026 3,000 304,956 255,119 560,075 SOUTH EL MONTE 118,675 168,825 71,987 142,165 5,000 506,652 426,564 933,216 SOUTH GATE 562,716 800,511 323,379 674,097 7,500 2,368,204 2,022,623 4,390,827 SOUTH PASADENA 162,698 231,452 96,911 194,902 6,000 691,963 584,802 1,276,765 TEMPLE CITY 220,425 313,573 129,592 264,054 6,000 933,644 792,293 1,725,937 TORRANCE 886,158 1,260,634 506,494 1,061,558 10,000 3,724,845 3,185,200 6,910,045 VERNON 1,273 1,811 5,521 1,525 1,000 11,130 4,576 15,706 WALNUT 171,592 244,104 101,946 205,556 6,000 729,199 616,770 1,345,969 WEST COVINA 661,359 940,838 379,225 792,264 10,000 2,783,686 2,377,183 5,160,869 WEST HOLLYWOOD 215,393 306,414 126,743 258,026 6,000 912,576 774,205 1,686,781 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 49,158 69,932 32,631 58,888 2,000 212,609 176,694 389,303 WHITTIER 530,568 754,777 305,178 635,585 7,500 2,233,608 1,907,069 4,140,677 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 81 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 116,418 165,615 45,384 139,461 4,000 470,879 418,453 889,332 MADERA 397,291 565,179 143,299 475,928 7,500 1,589,197 1,428,019 3,017,215

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 12,810 18,223 12,782 15,346 1,000 60,161 46,044 106,205 CORTE MADERA 61,516 87,511 43,133 73,692 3,000 268,852 221,112 489,964 FAIRFAX 45,797 65,151 33,338 54,862 2,000 201,149 164,614 365,762 LARKSPUR 78,875 112,207 53,951 94,487 3,000 342,520 283,509 626,029 MILL VALLEY 85,205 121,211 57,895 102,070 3,000 369,381 306,260 675,640 NOVATO 320,642 456,140 204,606 384,108 7,500 1,372,996 1,152,513 2,525,509 ROSS 14,089 20,043 13,580 16,878 1,000 65,590 50,642 116,232 SAN ANSELMO 77,089 109,666 52,838 92,348 3,000 334,941 277,089 612,030 SAN RAFAEL 371,098 527,917 236,048 444,550 7,500 1,587,113 1,333,870 2,920,983 SAUSALITO 42,925 61,065 31,549 51,422 2,000 188,960 154,290 343,250 TIBURON 55,072 78,344 39,118 65,972 2,000 240,505 197,949 438,453

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 43,161 61,400 31,288 51,703 2,000 189,551 155,136 344,687 POINT ARENA 2,776 3,949 6,503 3,325 1,000 17,552 9,977 27,529 UKIAH 100,187 142,524 66,285 120,017 4,000 433,014 360,112 793,125 WILLITS 29,850 42,464 23,119 35,758 2,000 133,190 107,292 240,482

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 191,583 272,542 88,383 229,503 6,000 788,012 688,623 1,476,635 DOS PALOS 34,960 49,734 20,053 41,880 2,000 148,628 125,662 274,289 GUSTINE 36,674 52,172 20,800 43,933 2,000 155,579 131,821 287,400 LIVINGSTON 86,949 123,692 42,734 104,159 4,000 361,533 312,528 674,060 LOS BANOS 281,416 400,337 127,576 337,117 6,000 1,152,445 1,011,518 2,163,963 MERCED 537,368 764,451 239,242 643,731 7,500 2,192,292 1,931,511 4,123,803

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 16,448 23,399 15,053 21,185 1,000 77,086 59,122 136,208

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 44,440 63,219 60,779 1,905,254 2,000 2,075,692 159,734 2,235,426 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 82 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 19,085 27,150 12,985 22,863 1,000 83,084 68,600 151,684 DEL REY OAKS 9,515 13,537 8,881 11,399 1,000 44,332 34,202 78,534 GONZALES 51,505 73,271 26,890 61,700 2,000 215,366 185,131 400,497 GREENFIELD 118,470 168,533 55,609 141,919 4,000 488,531 425,827 914,358 KING CITY 80,722 114,833 39,420 96,699 3,000 334,674 290,145 624,819 MARINA 131,431 186,971 61,168 157,445 6,000 543,015 472,413 1,015,428 MONTEREY 171,725 244,293 78,449 205,715 6,000 706,183 617,247 1,323,430 PACIFIC GROVE 90,273 128,421 43,516 108,141 4,000 374,352 324,478 698,830 SALINAS 974,941 1,386,936 422,931 1,167,914 10,000 3,962,722 3,504,321 7,467,043 SAND CITY 2,245 3,193 5,763 2,689 1,000 14,889 8,068 22,957 SEASIDE 197,357 280,757 89,442 236,421 6,000 809,977 709,379 1,519,356 SOLEDAD 166,548 236,928 76,229 199,513 6,000 685,219 598,639 1,283,857

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 130,682 185,907 64,929 156,549 5,000 543,067 469,724 1,012,791 CALISTOGA 31,485 44,790 19,287 37,717 2,000 135,279 113,169 248,448 NAPA 468,352 666,270 220,297 561,055 7,500 1,923,473 1,683,441 3,606,915SAINT HELENA 32,909 46,816 19,942 39,423 2,000 141,089 118,288 259,377YOUNTVILLE 18,035 25,657 13,098 21,605 1,000 79,396 64,826 144,222

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 82,164 116,885 106,233 98,427 3,000 406,708 295,329 702,037 NEVADA CITY 20,208 28,747 29,747 24,207 1,000 103,909 72,634 176,542 TRUCKEE 103,180 146,782 132,178 1,733,526 4,000 2,119,665 370,869 2,490,534 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 83 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 312,846 445,050 197,974 374,769 7,500 1,338,139 1,124,492 2,462,631 ANAHEIM 2,086,924 2,968,825 1,293,420 2,499,996 10,000 8,859,166 7,501,224 16,360,390 BREA 284,927 405,333 180,735 341,324 6,000 1,218,319 1,024,140 2,242,459 BUENA PARK 508,447 723,309 318,753 609,086 7,500 2,167,096 1,827,559 3,994,655COSTA MESA 678,767 965,602 423,920 813,117 10,000 2,891,407 2,439,753 5,331,160CYPRESS 304,049 432,535 192,542 364,230 6,000 1,299,356 1,092,870 2,392,226 DANA POINT 200,097 284,654 128,354 239,702 6,000 858,807 719,225 1,578,033 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 344,935 490,698 217,788 413,209 7,500 1,474,129 1,239,830 2,713,959 FULLERTON 871,194 1,239,347 542,739 1,043,632 10,000 3,706,912 3,131,413 6,838,325 GARDEN GROVE 1,038,110 1,476,799 645,805 1,243,587 10,000 4,414,301 3,731,375 8,145,676 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,197,520 1,703,573 744,237 1,434,549 10,000 5,089,879 4,304,356 9,394,235 IRVINE 1,872,021 2,663,106 1,160,723 2,242,556 10,000 7,948,406 6,728,776 14,677,182 LAGUNA BEACH 138,804 197,460 90,508 166,278 5,000 598,050 498,916 1,096,967 LAGUNA HILLS 189,410 269,452 121,756 226,901 6,000 813,520 680,816 1,494,335 LAGUNA NIGUEL 389,417 553,978 245,254 466,495 7,500 1,662,643 1,399,716 3,062,359 LAGUNA WOODS 107,144 152,422 70,959 128,352 4,000 462,876 385,118 847,994 LA HABRA 378,815 538,896 238,708 453,795 7,500 1,617,714 1,361,609 2,979,323 LAKE FOREST 523,593 744,854 328,104 627,229 7,500 2,231,280 1,881,997 4,113,277 LA PALMA 94,032 133,769 62,863 112,645 4,000 407,309 337,990 745,298 LOS ALAMITOS 71,779 102,112 49,122 85,987 3,000 312,000 258,003 570,004 MISSION VIEJO 565,166 803,996 353,775 677,031 7,500 2,407,469 2,031,429 4,438,898 NEWPORT BEACH 513,824 730,957 322,072 615,526 7,500 2,189,880 1,846,884 4,036,764 ORANGE 842,304 1,198,248 524,900 1,009,024 10,000 3,584,475 3,027,570 6,612,045 PLACENTIA 312,629 444,741 197,840 374,509 7,500 1,337,219 1,123,711 2,460,930 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 289,320 411,582 183,447 346,586 6,000 1,236,935 1,039,929 2,276,865SAN CLEMENTE 387,063 550,630 243,801 463,676 7,500 1,652,671 1,391,257 3,043,928 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 211,114 300,328 135,158 252,901 6,000 905,501 758,828 1,664,329 SANTA ANA 1,872,986 2,664,480 1,161,319 2,243,712 10,000 7,952,497 6,732,246 14,684,744 SEAL BEACH 152,308 216,671 98,846 182,455 5,000 655,280 547,455 1,202,734 STANTON 236,982 337,127 151,130 283,888 6,000 1,015,127 851,806 1,866,932 TUSTIN 485,120 690,124 304,349 581,142 7,500 2,068,235 1,743,713 3,811,948 VILLA PARK 35,377 50,326 26,644 42,379 2,000 156,727 127,158 283,885 WESTMINSTER 549,074 781,103 343,838 657,754 7,500 2,339,269 1,973,586 4,312,856 YORBA LINDA 410,879 584,510 258,507 492,206 7,500 1,753,602 1,476,861 3,230,462 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 84 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 83,153 118,293 57,048 99,612 3,000 361,106 298,886 659,992 COLFAX 12,321 17,528 12,542 14,760 1,000 58,151 44,287 102,438 LINCOLN 309,250 439,934 199,112 370,461 6,000 1,324,757 1,111,566 2,436,322 LOOMIS 41,115 58,490 30,634 49,253 2,000 181,492 147,784 329,275 ROCKLIN 432,408 615,137 276,496 517,996 7,500 1,849,537 1,554,244 3,403,781 ROSEVILLE 911,326 1,296,437 577,415 1,091,707 10,000 3,886,885 3,275,661 7,162,547

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 12,671 18,026 8,727 128,729 1,000 169,153 45,545 214,698

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 186,309 265,040 119,780 223,186 6,000 800,315 669,668 1,469,982 BEAUMONT 329,995 469,445 208,454 395,311 7,500 1,410,705 1,186,130 2,596,835 BLYTHE 112,146 159,537 74,010 134,344 5,000 485,038 403,098 888,135 CALIMESA 65,764 93,554 45,386 78,780 2,000 285,484 236,380 521,864 CANYON LAKE 66,789 95,013 46,019 80,009 3,000 290,831 240,067 530,898 CATHEDRAL CITY 312,798 444,981 197,841 374,711 7,500 1,337,832 1,124,318 2,462,150 COACHELLA 254,378 361,873 161,788 304,727 6,000 1,088,766 914,333 2,003,099 CORONA 945,984 1,345,742 588,609 1,133,226 10,000 4,023,561 3,400,239 7,423,800 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 196,518 279,564 126,080 235,416 6,000 843,579 706,364 1,549,943 EASTVALE 421,945 600,253 265,201 505,462 7,500 1,800,361 1,516,637 3,316,998 HEMET 540,916 769,498 338,623 647,981 7,500 2,304,518 1,944,264 4,248,782 INDIAN WELLS 28,733 40,876 22,533 34,421 2,000 128,563 103,279 231,842 INDIO 537,845 765,129 336,728 644,302 7,500 2,291,503 1,933,225 4,224,728 JURUPA VALLEY 635,878 904,589 397,228 761,739 10,000 2,709,434 2,285,593 4,995,027 LAKE ELSINORE 432,119 614,725 271,479 517,649 7,500 1,843,472 1,553,203 3,396,675 LA QUINTA 228,444 324,981 145,783 273,660 6,000 978,868 821,117 1,799,984 MENIFEE 643,378 915,259 401,857 770,724 7,500 2,738,717 2,312,552 5,051,269 MORENO VALLEY 1,263,543 1,797,496 784,588 1,513,640 10,000 5,369,267 4,541,669 9,910,937 MURRIETA 670,868 954,366 418,822 803,655 10,000 2,857,712 2,411,363 5,269,076 NORCO 160,858 228,834 104,073 192,697 6,000 692,462 578,187 1,270,649 PALM DESERT 307,060 436,818 194,300 367,837 7,500 1,313,515 1,103,693 2,417,208 PALM SPRINGS 267,888 381,092 170,125 320,911 6,000 1,146,017 962,893 2,108,909 PERRIS 476,015 677,172 298,570 570,234 7,500 2,029,491 1,710,985 3,740,476 RANCHO MIRAGE 101,394 144,241 67,375 121,463 4,000 438,473 364,449 802,922 RIVERSIDE 1,917,860 2,728,317 1,188,396 2,297,469 10,000 8,142,042 6,893,542 15,035,584 SAN JACINTO 329,409 468,612 208,093 394,610 7,500 1,408,225 1,184,026 2,592,251 TEMECULA 663,278 943,568 414,138 794,562 10,000 2,825,546 2,384,080 5,209,625 WILDOMAR 221,565 315,195 141,538 265,420 6,000 949,718 796,392 1,746,110 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 85 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 529,264 752,923 347,302 634,023 7,500 2,271,013 1,902,384 4,173,396 ELK GROVE 1,067,833 1,519,082 695,824 1,279,193 10,000 4,571,933 3,838,211 8,410,144 FOLSOM 510,421 726,116 335,107 611,450 7,500 2,190,593 1,834,651 4,025,245 GALT 153,666 218,602 104,241 184,081 6,000 666,590 552,334 1,218,925 ISLETON 4,797 6,824 7,904 5,746 1,000 26,272 17,242 43,514 RANCHO CORDOVA 484,879 689,781 318,579 580,853 7,500 2,081,591 1,742,845 3,824,436 SACRAMENTO 3,139,226 4,465,813 2,036,279 3,760,584 20,000 13,421,902 11,283,610 24,705,512

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 256,767 365,273 151,416 307,590 6,000 1,087,046 922,921 2,009,967 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 12,629 17,966 12,011 15,129 1,000 58,735 45,393 104,128

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 221,215 314,697 138,543 265,001 6,000 945,456 795,134 1,740,591 APPLE VALLEY 458,625 652,433 282,077 549,403 7,500 1,950,038 1,648,480 3,598,518 BARSTOW 154,064 219,169 97,944 184,558 5,000 660,735 553,766 1,214,501 BIG BEAR LAKE 30,453 43,322 23,211 412,007 2,000 510,994 109,461 620,454 CHINO 555,108 789,687 340,408 664,982 7,500 2,357,685 1,995,275 4,352,960 CHINO HILLS 473,493 673,584 291,066 567,213 7,500 2,012,855 1,701,919 3,714,775 COLTON 324,757 461,994 201,143 389,037 7,500 1,384,431 1,167,304 2,551,736 FONTANA 1,284,070 1,826,698 781,127 1,538,231 10,000 5,440,126 4,615,452 10,055,578 GRAND TERRACE 79,298 112,808 52,742 94,993 3,000 342,840 285,027 627,867 HESPERIA 605,346 861,155 370,782 725,164 7,500 2,569,947 2,175,851 4,745,798 HIGHLAND 343,535 488,707 212,495 411,532 7,500 1,463,768 1,234,798 2,698,566 LOMA LINDA 152,954 217,589 97,273 183,228 5,000 656,044 549,775 1,205,819 MONTCLAIR 229,669 326,723 143,654 275,128 6,000 981,173 825,519 1,806,693 NEEDLES 29,747 42,318 22,785 35,635 2,000 132,485 106,923 239,408 ONTARIO 1,083,183 1,540,919 659,674 1,297,581 10,000 4,591,358 3,893,386 8,484,744 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,052,773 1,497,657 641,288 1,261,151 10,000 4,462,869 3,784,077 8,246,946 REDLANDS 439,649 625,437 270,604 526,670 7,500 1,869,860 1,580,270 3,450,130 RIALTO 628,365 893,902 384,699 752,740 10,000 2,669,706 2,258,592 4,928,298 SAN BERNARDINO 1,348,247 1,917,995 819,927 1,615,110 10,000 5,711,278 4,846,129 10,557,407 TWENTYNINE PALMS 167,049 237,641 105,795 200,113 6,000 716,598 600,439 1,317,037 UPLAND 477,518 679,309 293,499 572,034 7,500 2,029,860 1,716,386 3,746,245 VICTORVILLE 823,997 1,172,205 502,974 987,093 10,000 3,496,269 2,961,768 6,458,036 YUCAIPA 330,477 470,132 204,601 395,890 7,500 1,408,599 1,187,865 2,596,464 YUCCA VALLEY 131,618 187,237 84,374 157,669 5,000 565,898 473,086 1,038,983 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 86 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 697,430 992,152 450,241 835,474 10,000 2,985,296 2,506,835 5,492,131 CHULA VISTA 1,670,096 2,375,851 1,071,473 2,000,663 10,000 7,128,083 6,002,979 13,131,062 CORONADO 142,268 202,388 95,665 170,427 5,000 615,747 511,365 1,127,112 DEL MAR 23,780 33,829 19,988 28,486 1,000 107,082 85,473 192,556 EL CAJON 640,626 911,345 413,961 767,428 10,000 2,743,360 2,302,662 5,046,022 ENCINITAS 371,176 528,029 241,866 444,644 7,500 1,593,215 1,334,152 2,927,367 ESCONDIDO 910,282 1,294,952 586,187 1,090,457 10,000 3,891,878 3,271,909 7,163,787 IMPERIAL BEACH 159,947 227,538 106,956 191,606 6,000 692,047 574,912 1,266,959 LA MESA 364,937 519,153 237,881 437,170 7,500 1,566,642 1,311,726 2,878,368 LEMON GROVE 164,816 234,465 110,066 197,439 6,000 712,786 592,414 1,305,201 NATIONAL CITY 370,911 527,651 241,697 444,326 7,500 1,592,084 1,333,198 2,925,282 OCEANSIDE 1,044,156 1,485,400 671,691 1,250,829 10,000 4,462,077 3,753,106 8,215,183 POWAY 294,207 418,535 192,707 352,441 6,000 1,263,890 1,057,497 2,321,387 SAN DIEGO 8,329,500 11,849,411 5,324,763 9,978,185 20,000 35,501,859 29,939,486 65,441,345 SAN MARCOS 567,900 807,885 367,511 680,306 7,500 2,431,102 2,041,254 4,472,355 SANTEE 358,052 509,359 233,484 428,923 7,500 1,537,318 1,286,980 2,824,299 SOLANA BEACH 77,819 110,705 54,502 93,222 3,000 339,249 279,713 618,962 VISTA 605,147 860,872 391,301 724,926 10,000 2,592,246 2,175,135 4,767,381

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 5,273,427 7,501,891 2,018,460 6,317,213 20,000 21,130,991 18,954,762 40,085,753

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 44,886 63,854 30,811 53,771 2,000 195,323 161,339 356,662 LATHROP 189,048 268,937 114,352 226,467 6,000 804,805 679,514 1,484,319 LODI 401,677 571,420 237,569 481,183 7,500 1,699,349 1,443,786 3,143,135 MANTECA 524,099 745,575 308,512 627,836 7,500 2,213,522 1,883,819 4,097,341 RIPON 96,416 137,160 60,672 115,500 4,000 413,747 346,556 760,304 STOCKTON 1,951,705 2,776,463 1,135,798 2,338,012 10,000 8,211,977 7,015,191 15,227,168 TRACY 570,434 811,490 335,362 683,342 7,500 2,408,127 2,050,363 4,458,490

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 110,632 157,383 81,805 132,529 4,000 486,349 397,654 884,003 ATASCADERO 185,730 264,216 134,077 222,492 6,000 812,515 667,586 1,480,101 EL PASO DE ROBLES 189,236 269,203 136,517 226,691 6,000 827,648 680,187 1,507,834 GROVER BEACH 76,963 109,486 58,370 92,196 3,000 340,014 276,633 616,647 MORRO BAY 63,658 90,558 49,109 76,258 3,000 282,583 228,811 511,394 PISMO BEACH 48,561 69,082 38,601 58,173 2,000 216,416 174,547 390,963 SAN LUIS OBISPO 287,534 409,041 204,938 344,446 6,000 1,251,959 1,033,510 2,285,469 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 87 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 42,123 59,923 30,757 50,460 2,000 185,263 151,406 336,668 BELMONT 169,704 241,418 109,374 203,294 6,000 729,789 609,982 1,339,770 BRISBANE 29,283 41,657 22,844 35,079 1,000 129,862 105,253 235,115 BURLINGAME 188,578 268,268 121,004 225,904 6,000 809,753 677,823 1,487,576 COLMA 8,791 12,507 10,217 10,532 1,000 43,047 31,600 74,647 DALY CITY 632,758 900,151 394,713 758,002 10,000 2,695,625 2,274,381 4,970,005 EAST PALO ALTO 181,277 257,881 116,505 217,157 6,000 778,821 651,580 1,430,400 FOSTER CITY 203,325 289,246 130,091 243,569 6,000 872,232 730,829 1,603,060 HALF MOON BAY 70,929 100,902 48,507 84,968 3,000 308,305 254,945 563,251 HILLSBOROUGH 68,648 97,657 47,102 82,235 3,000 298,642 246,747 545,389 MENLO PARK 206,100 293,195 131,802 246,894 6,000 883,991 740,805 1,624,796 MILLBRAE 140,759 200,242 91,537 168,620 5,000 606,158 505,943 1,112,101 PACIFICA 233,404 332,036 148,626 279,602 6,000 999,668 838,944 1,838,613 PORTOLA VALLEY 26,785 38,103 21,305 32,086 1,000 119,279 96,274 215,553 REDWOOD CITY 503,717 716,579 315,197 603,419 7,500 2,146,412 1,810,556 3,956,968 SAN BRUNO 265,583 377,813 168,455 318,150 6,000 1,136,001 954,608 2,090,609 SAN CARLOS 185,531 263,933 119,126 222,253 6,000 796,843 666,870 1,463,713 SAN MATEO 638,092 907,739 398,000 764,392 10,000 2,718,223 2,293,553 5,011,776 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 399,922 568,922 251,237 479,079 7,500 1,706,659 1,437,475 3,144,134 WOODSIDE 32,034 45,571 24,540 38,375 2,000 142,520 115,143 257,662

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 31,075 44,206 20,571 37,225 2,000 135,077 111,694 246,771 CARPINTERIA 79,376 112,919 45,084 95,087 3,000 335,467 285,309 620,776 GOLETA 197,279 280,645 104,922 236,327 6,000 825,172 709,097 1,534,269GUADALUPE 51,554 73,340 30,964 61,758 2,000 219,615 185,304 404,920 LOMPOC 267,869 381,067 140,747 320,890 6,000 1,116,573 962,828 2,079,401 SANTA BARBARA 527,822 750,872 272,677 632,296 7,500 2,191,167 1,897,200 4,088,367 SANTA MARIA 663,187 943,439 341,376 794,454 10,000 2,752,456 2,383,754 5,136,211SOLVANG 35,117 49,957 22,623 42,068 2,000 151,766 126,226 277,991 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 88 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 264,804 376,706 158,584 317,218 6,000 1,123,312 951,810 2,075,122 CUPERTINO 365,396 519,806 217,002 437,719 7,500 1,547,422 1,313,375 2,860,797 GILROY 361,884 514,810 214,962 433,513 7,500 1,532,669 1,300,752 2,833,421 LOS ALTOS 191,076 271,821 115,766 228,896 6,000 813,560 686,801 1,500,361 LOS ALTOS HILLS 51,306 72,988 34,596 61,462 2,000 222,351 184,415 406,767 LOS GATOS 202,534 288,122 122,421 242,622 6,000 861,700 727,987 1,589,687 MILPITAS 494,865 703,987 292,191 592,815 7,500 2,091,358 1,778,739 3,870,098 MONTE SERENO 21,052 29,949 17,026 25,219 1,000 94,246 75,670 169,917 MORGAN HILL 280,281 398,723 167,572 335,758 6,000 1,188,335 1,007,440 2,195,775 MOUNTAIN VIEW 506,028 719,867 298,673 606,188 7,500 2,138,256 1,818,862 3,957,118 PALO ALTO 413,323 587,986 244,835 495,133 7,500 1,748,778 1,485,644 3,234,422 SAN JOSE 6,129,403 8,719,590 3,564,423 7,342,616 20,000 25,776,032 22,031,477 47,807,509 SANTA CLARA 785,175 1,116,977 460,787 940,587 10,000 3,313,525 2,822,225 6,135,750 SARATOGA 188,282 267,847 114,144 225,549 6,000 801,823 676,760 1,478,583 SUNNYVALE 942,702 1,341,073 552,270 1,129,294 10,000 3,975,338 3,388,440 7,363,779

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 59,452 84,576 37,511 71,220 3,000 255,758 213,694 469,452 SANTA CRUZ 390,581 555,634 219,699 467,890 7,500 1,641,304 1,403,901 3,045,205 SCOTTS VALLEY 74,145 105,477 45,595 88,820 3,000 317,037 266,505 583,542 WATSONVILLE 312,412 444,432 176,690 374,248 7,500 1,315,282 1,122,930 2,438,212

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 67,363 95,829 55,540 80,696 3,000 302,428 242,127 544,555 REDDING 566,198 805,464 431,284 678,267 7,500 2,488,714 2,035,138 4,523,852 SHASTA LAKE 62,366 88,722 51,777 74,711 3,000 280,576 224,170 504,746

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 4,453 6,335 6,261 21,589 1,000 39,638 16,006 55,644

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 5,183 7,373 8,572 6,209 1,000 28,338 18,630 46,968 DUNSMUIR 10,288 14,635 12,287 38,182 1,000 76,393 36,978 113,371 ETNA 4,127 5,871 7,804 4,944 1,000 23,746 14,835 38,581 FORT JONES 4,188 5,957 7,848 5,016 1,000 24,009 15,052 39,060 MONTAGUE 7,422 10,558 10,201 8,891 1,000 38,072 26,677 64,748 MOUNT SHASTA 19,574 27,846 19,046 91,884 1,000 159,350 70,357 229,706 TULELAKE 5,437 7,734 8,757 6,513 1,000 29,440 19,541 48,981 WEED 17,510 24,910 17,544 20,976 1,000 81,941 62,939 144,880 YREKA 46,950 66,790 38,970 56,909 2,000 211,619 168,756 380,375 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 89 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 163,441 232,508 107,148 195,791 6,000 704,888 587,469 1,292,357 DIXON 115,145 163,804 76,905 137,936 4,000 497,790 413,877 911,667 FAIRFIELD 727,122 1,034,393 460,133 871,044 10,000 3,102,692 2,613,563 5,716,255 RIO VISTA 60,279 85,752 42,547 72,210 2,000 262,788 216,666 479,453 SUISUN CITY 177,759 252,877 116,115 212,943 6,000 765,694 638,936 1,404,630 VACAVILLE 617,233 878,065 391,318 739,404 7,500 2,633,520 2,218,577 4,852,097 VALLEJO 759,012 1,079,758 480,102 909,245 10,000 3,238,117 2,728,185 5,966,302

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 54,347 77,314 38,568 65,105 2,000 237,334 195,346 432,680 COTATI 45,737 65,065 33,218 54,790 2,000 200,810 164,397 365,207 HEALDSBURG 68,219 97,048 47,187 81,722 3,000 297,177 245,207 542,384 PETALUMA 360,924 513,445 229,056 432,363 7,500 1,543,289 1,297,304 2,840,593 ROHNERT PARK 265,872 378,225 169,997 318,497 6,000 1,138,592 955,649 2,094,240SANTA ROSA 1,074,157 1,528,078 672,215 1,286,768 10,000 4,571,218 3,860,940 8,432,158 SEBASTOPOL 45,387 64,567 33,001 54,371 2,000 199,325 163,139 362,464 SONOMA 65,040 92,524 45,212 77,913 3,000 283,688 233,778 517,466WINDSOR 158,155 224,988 103,068 189,459 6,000 681,670 568,470 1,250,140

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 295,650 420,586 174,574 354,168 6,000 1,250,979 1,062,680 2,313,659 HUGHSON 45,224 64,335 30,770 54,176 2,000 196,504 162,553 359,058 MODESTO 1,321,577 1,880,054 763,706 1,583,161 10,000 5,558,499 4,750,267 10,308,765 NEWMAN 74,555 106,061 47,613 89,312 3,000 320,540 267,980 588,520 OAKDALE 139,848 198,945 85,107 167,529 5,000 596,428 502,668 1,099,097 PATTERSON 147,046 209,186 89,240 176,152 5,000 626,624 528,542 1,155,167 RIVERBANK 149,695 212,954 90,761 179,325 6,000 638,736 538,064 1,176,799 TURLOCK 434,954 618,759 254,569 521,046 7,500 1,836,829 1,563,397 3,400,226WATERFORD 54,903 78,103 36,327 65,770 2,000 237,103 197,341 434,444

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 56,683 80,636 36,622 67,902 2,000 243,842 203,739 447,582 YUBA CITY 423,466 602,416 242,537 507,284 7,500 1,783,203 1,522,102 3,305,305

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 49,665 70,653 31,726 59,495 2,000 213,539 178,516 392,055 RED BLUFF 89,441 127,237 53,290 107,144 3,000 380,111 321,485 701,596 TEHAMA 2,625 3,734 6,223 3,144 1,000 16,726 9,434 26,160

TRINITY COUNTY
12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 90 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2022-23 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 151,614 215,684 86,060 181,624 6,000 640,981 544,960 1,185,941 EXETER 62,475 88,876 38,284 74,841 3,000 267,477 224,560 492,037 FARMERSVILLE 62,656 89,134 38,381 75,058 3,000 268,229 225,211 493,440 LINDSAY 76,613 108,988 45,862 91,777 3,000 326,239 275,376 601,614 PORTERVILLE 378,031 537,780 207,411 452,855 7,500 1,583,577 1,358,790 2,942,367 TULARE 419,127 596,244 229,437 502,087 7,500 1,754,395 1,506,508 3,260,904 VISALIA 857,364 1,219,673 464,316 1,027,065 10,000 3,578,419 3,081,704 6,660,122 WOODLAKE 46,147 65,648 29,533 55,281 2,000 198,611 165,872 364,482

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 31,370 44,627 31,723 37,580 1,000 146,300 112,757 259,057

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 426,929 607,343 271,417 511,433 7,500 1,824,622 1,534,551 3,359,174 FILLMORE 99,372 141,366 66,858 119,042 4,000 430,638 357,184 787,821 MOORPARK 218,494 310,826 141,249 261,741 6,000 938,310 785,353 1,723,663 OJAI 46,190 65,709 33,645 55,332 2,000 202,876 166,023 368,899 OXNARD 1,216,732 1,730,903 764,649 1,457,564 10,000 5,179,848 4,373,412 9,553,260 PORT HUENEME 133,929 190,525 88,438 160,438 5,000 578,330 481,392 1,059,722 SAN BUENAVENTURA 664,110 944,753 419,537 795,560 10,000 2,833,960 2,387,073 5,221,032 SANTA PAULA 186,400 265,169 121,207 223,294 6,000 802,069 669,993 1,472,062SIMI VALLEY 761,184 1,082,848 480,159 911,847 10,000 3,246,038 2,735,993 5,982,031 THOUSAND OAKS 764,002 1,086,856 481,919 915,223 10,000 3,258,000 2,746,121 6,004,122

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 391,414 556,819 246,942 468,888 7,500 1,671,563 1,406,894 3,078,457 WEST SACRAMENTO 318,814 453,539 202,030 381,918 7,500 1,363,800 1,145,941 2,509,742 WINTERS 44,784 63,709 32,505 53,648 2,000 196,645 160,970 357,615 WOODLAND 362,861 516,201 229,279 434,684 7,500 1,550,524 1,304,266 2,854,790

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 79,581 113,211 43,279 95,333 3,000 334,404 286,046 620,450 WHEATLAND 22,446 31,932 15,653 26,889 1,000 97,920 80,680 178,600 Statewide Total $ 199,638,500 284,002,500 $ 118,047,519 $ 244,377,500 $ 2,709,500 $ 848,775,519 $ 717,579,000 $ 1,566,354,519 $ Notes:

4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019.3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations. 12 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 91 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 517,183 781,004 288,922 621,206 7,500 2,215,815 1,948,326 4,164,141 ALBANY 147,120 222,167 85,622 176,710 4,000 635,620 554,228 1,189,848 BERKELEY 832,329 1,256,909 462,053 999,738 10,000 3,561,029 3,135,540 6,696,569 DUBLIN 486,972 735,381 272,325 584,918 7,500 2,087,096 1,834,514 3,921,610 EMERYVILLE 83,265 125,739 50,543 100,012 3,000 362,560 313,675 676,235 FREMONT 1,508,752 2,278,383 833,656 1,812,212 10,000 6,443,002 5,683,751 12,126,754 HAYWARD 1,075,936 1,624,783 595,882 1,292,343 10,000 4,598,944 4,053,254 8,652,198 LIVERMORE 575,447 868,989 320,931 691,188 7,500 2,464,055 2,167,817 4,631,871 NEWARK 311,130 469,841 175,724 373,709 6,000 1,336,404 1,172,085 2,508,489 OAKLAND 2,842,285 4,292,167 1,566,253 3,413,963 10,000 12,124,669 10,707,423 22,832,092 PIEDMONT 73,881 111,569 45,388 88,741 3,000 322,580 278,325 600,905 PLEASANTON 523,259 790,180 292,261 628,504 7,500 2,241,704 1,971,217 4,212,921 SAN LEANDRO 596,170 900,283 332,315 716,079 7,500 2,552,346 2,245,883 4,798,229 UNION CITY 459,582 694,020 257,278 552,019 7,500 1,970,399 1,731,331 3,701,730

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,312 1,982 5,694 1,576 1,000 11,565 4,944 16,509 IONE 58,323 88,074 44,548 70,054 2,000 262,999 219,713 482,713 JACKSON 33,276 50,250 27,478 39,969 1,000 151,973 125,356 277,329 PLYMOUTH 7,015 10,593 9,581 8,426 1,000 36,614 26,426 63,040 SUTTER CREEK 17,343 26,190 16,620 20,832 1,000 81,985 65,336 147,321

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 12,881 19,452 12,902 15,472 1,000 61,708 48,526 110,233 CHICO 675,176 1,019,591 429,488 810,976 10,000 2,945,231 2,543,515 5,488,746 GRIDLEY 48,067 72,586 35,034 57,734 2,000 215,421 181,076 396,496 OROVILLE 130,787 197,503 87,065 157,093 4,000 576,448 492,699 1,069,147 PARADISE 50,560 76,351 36,602 93,145 6,000 262,659 190,469 453,129

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 23,958 36,179 30,841 28,777 1,000 120,755 90,254 211,008

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 41,885 63,251 20,014 50,310 2,000 177,460 157,789 335,249 WILLIAMS 36,504 55,126 18,060 43,847 2,000 155,536 137,519 293,055 TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 92 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 756,774 1,142,813 454,860 908,987 10,000 3,273,434 2,850,911 6,124,345 BRENTWOOD 422,211 637,586 255,892 507,132 7,500 1,830,322 1,590,550 3,420,872 CLAYTON 72,602 109,637 47,977 87,204 3,000 320,420 273,505 593,925 CONCORD 823,917 1,244,206 494,790 989,633 10,000 3,562,545 3,103,848 6,666,394 DANVILLE 286,523 432,681 175,197 344,152 6,000 1,244,553 1,079,384 2,323,937 EL CERRITO 170,225 257,058 106,034 204,462 5,000 742,779 641,268 1,384,046 HERCULES 171,209 258,544 106,619 205,645 6,000 748,017 644,976 1,392,993 LAFAYETTE 166,825 251,925 104,012 200,380 6,000 729,142 628,463 1,357,605 MARTINEZ 246,317 371,967 151,287 295,860 6,000 1,071,431 927,924 1,999,354 MORAGA 113,339 171,154 72,203 136,135 4,000 496,831 426,968 923,799 OAKLEY 292,225 441,292 178,588 351,001 6,000 1,269,107 1,100,866 2,369,973 ORINDA 128,090 193,430 80,976 153,853 4,000 560,349 482,539 1,042,888 PINOLE 124,245 187,623 78,689 149,234 4,000 543,792 468,053 1,011,845 PITTSBURG 500,299 755,507 302,332 600,926 7,500 2,166,564 1,884,720 4,051,284 PLEASANT HILL 226,454 341,971 139,474 272,002 6,000 985,901 853,095 1,838,996 RICHMOND 760,495 1,148,432 457,072 913,456 10,000 3,289,455 2,864,927 6,154,382 SAN PABLO 211,322 319,120 130,475 253,826 6,000 920,743 796,091 1,716,834 SAN RAMON 555,111 838,280 334,929 666,763 7,500 2,402,583 2,091,209 4,493,791 WALNUT CREEK 461,327 696,656 279,155 554,116 7,500 1,998,754 1,737,907 3,736,661

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 44,280 66,868 26,750 53,187 2,000 193,085 166,812 359,897

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 70,942 107,130 70,669 85,210 3,000 336,951 267,250 604,202 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 140,591 212,307 135,339 1,214,056 5,000 1,707,293 529,631 2,236,924 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 93 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 811,488 1,225,437 410,248 974,705 10,000 3,431,879 3,057,028 6,488,907 COALINGA 118,555 179,032 64,034 142,401 4,000 508,023 446,621 954,643 FIREBAUGH 55,377 83,625 32,468 66,515 2,000 239,984 208,614 448,598 FOWLER 45,685 68,989 27,626 54,873 2,000 199,172 172,102 371,274 FRESNO 3,567,490 5,387,307 1,787,244 4,285,030 20,000 15,047,072 13,439,405 28,486,476 HURON 40,487 61,141 25,029 48,631 2,000 177,288 152,524 329,812 KERMAN 109,185 164,881 59,353 131,146 4,000 468,565 411,320 879,885 KINGSBURG 82,064 123,926 45,802 98,570 3,000 353,363 309,151 662,514 MENDOTA 82,596 124,729 46,068 99,208 3,000 355,601 311,154 666,754 ORANGE COVE 63,113 95,308 36,334 75,807 2,000 272,562 237,759 510,321 PARLIER 95,602 144,369 52,566 114,830 4,000 411,367 360,149 771,516 REEDLEY 163,932 247,555 86,706 196,904 6,000 701,096 617,561 1,318,657 SANGER 174,398 263,360 91,935 209,475 6,000 745,169 656,990 1,402,159 SAN JOAQUIN 24,273 36,655 16,928 29,155 1,000 108,010 91,440 199,450 SELMA 162,193 244,929 85,837 194,815 5,000 692,774 611,010 1,303,784

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 54,248 81,920 28,652 65,159 2,000 231,980 204,362 436,342 WILLOWS 42,174 63,687 23,343 50,656 2,000 181,861 158,877 340,738

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 122,000 184,234 82,927 146,539 4,000 539,701 459,599 999,300 BLUE LAKE 7,901 11,931 9,859 9,490 1,000 40,181 29,763 69,944 EUREKA 177,023 267,324 118,163 212,628 6,000 781,137 666,878 1,448,015 FERNDALE 9,141 13,804 10,654 10,979 1,000 45,578 34,435 80,013 FORTUNA 82,163 124,075 57,416 98,688 3,000 365,341 309,522 674,863 RIO DELL 22,225 33,563 19,033 26,696 1,000 102,517 83,727 186,244 TRINIDAD 2,015 3,042 6,090 2,420 1,000 14,566 7,589 22,156

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 176,859 267,076 109,581 212,431 6,000 771,947 666,260 1,438,206 CALEXICO 254,106 383,729 155,347 305,216 6,000 1,104,397 957,267 2,061,664 CALIPATRIA 43,381 65,511 30,501 52,107 2,000 193,500 163,425 356,926 EL CENTRO 294,121 444,156 179,054 353,279 6,000 1,276,610 1,108,011 2,384,620 HOLTVILLE 36,517 55,145 26,435 43,862 2,000 163,960 137,568 301,528 IMPERIAL 141,168 213,179 88,436 169,562 4,000 616,345 531,806 1,148,151 WESTMORLAND 13,255 20,017 12,653 15,921 1,000 62,846 49,935 112,781

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 25,388 38,339 20,817 30,495 1,000 116,040 95,643 211,682 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 94 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 129,593 195,699 57,240 155,658 5,000 543,190 488,200 1,031,390 BAKERSFIELD 2,682,967 4,051,579 1,090,459 3,222,600 10,000 11,057,605 10,107,240 21,164,845 CALIFORNIA CITY 98,522 148,779 44,667 118,338 3,000 413,305 371,150 784,454 DELANO 338,448 511,094 141,752 406,521 7,500 1,405,314 1,274,996 2,680,310 MARICOPA 6,726 10,157 7,522 8,079 1,000 33,484 25,338 58,822 MCFARLAND 93,036 140,494 42,447 111,748 3,000 390,726 350,484 741,209 RIDGECREST 184,136 278,066 79,310 221,172 6,000 768,684 693,675 1,462,358 SHAFTER 134,429 203,003 59,196 161,467 5,000 563,095 506,419 1,069,514 TAFT 57,070 86,181 27,893 68,548 2,000 241,692 214,992 456,684 TEHACHAPI 85,713 129,436 39,484 102,952 3,000 360,584 322,896 683,480 WASCO 177,935 268,701 76,801 213,723 6,000 743,161 670,314 1,413,475

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 89,893 135,748 42,652 107,973 4,000 380,266 338,643 718,908 CORCORAN 144,672 218,471 65,719 173,770 5,000 607,632 545,007 1,152,639 HANFORD 382,557 577,704 165,887 459,502 7,500 1,593,151 1,441,165 3,034,316 LEMOORE 177,554 268,127 79,565 213,266 6,000 744,512 668,880 1,413,392

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 110,734 167,220 53,210 133,006 4,000 468,169 417,154 885,323 LAKEPORT 32,803 49,537 19,141 39,401 1,000 141,882 123,576 265,459

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 105,714 159,639 53,211 209,563 4,000 532,127 398,243 930,370

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 132,802 200,545 80,102 159,512 5,000 577,961 500,288 1,078,249 ALHAMBRA 542,125 818,669 312,200 651,164 7,500 2,331,659 2,042,287 4,373,946 ARCADIA 373,338 563,781 216,493 448,428 7,500 1,609,540 1,406,433 3,015,974ARTESIA 108,194 163,385 66,149 129,955 4,000 471,684 407,587 879,271AVALON 22,599 34,128 17,615 27,145 1,000 102,487 85,137 187,623 AZUSA 331,124 500,035 192,557 397,725 6,000 1,427,441 1,247,408 2,674,849 BALDWIN PARK 472,837 714,037 272,912 567,940 7,500 2,035,226 1,781,266 3,816,492BELL 224,052 338,344 131,844 269,117 6,000 969,358 844,048 1,813,405BELLFLOWER 517,610 781,648 298,299 621,718 7,500 2,226,775 1,949,932 4,176,707 BELL GARDENS 258,647 390,586 151,460 310,670 6,000 1,117,364 974,373 2,091,736 BEVERLY HILLS 214,636 324,124 126,505 257,806 6,000 929,071 808,574 1,737,646 BRADBURY 6,037 9,117 8,223 7,251 1,000 31,628 22,743 54,371 BURBANK 703,458 1,062,300 403,681 844,947 10,000 3,024,386 2,650,059 5,674,445 CALABASAS 152,448 230,214 91,242 183,110 5,000 662,014 574,301 1,236,315 CARSON 615,895 930,070 354,030 739,772 7,500 2,647,267 2,320,192 4,967,459 CERRITOS 324,005 489,283 188,520 389,173 6,000 1,396,980 1,220,586 2,617,567 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 95 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code CLAREMONT 245,733 371,085 144,138 295,158 6,000 1,062,114 925,723 1,987,837 COMMERCE 81,224 122,658 50,856 97,561 3,000 355,300 305,987 661,287 COMPTON 630,738 952,485 362,446 757,601 7,500 2,710,770 2,376,109 5,086,879 COVINA 336,728 508,497 195,734 404,456 6,000 1,451,416 1,268,519 2,719,935 CUDAHY 149,476 225,725 89,557 179,540 5,000 649,297 563,102 1,212,399 CULVER CITY 265,439 400,842 155,311 318,827 6,000 1,146,420 999,958 2,146,379 DIAMOND BAR 360,719 544,726 209,338 433,272 7,500 1,555,554 1,358,896 2,914,450 DOWNEY 747,745 1,129,178 428,792 898,141 10,000 3,213,857 2,816,896 6,030,753 DUARTE 142,244 214,805 85,456 170,854 5,000 618,359 535,861 1,154,220 EL MONTE 716,129 1,081,435 410,866 860,167 10,000 3,078,597 2,697,794 5,776,390 EL SEGUNDO 113,509 171,412 69,163 136,340 4,000 494,424 427,611 922,034 GARDENA 399,776 603,706 231,484 480,184 7,500 1,722,650 1,506,031 3,228,682 GLENDALE 1,285,854 1,941,783 733,916 1,544,482 10,000 5,516,035 4,844,054 10,360,089 GLENDORA 344,544 520,299 200,166 413,843 7,500 1,486,352 1,297,961 2,784,313 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 91,540 138,235 56,706 109,951 3,000 399,432 344,847 744,279 HAWTHORNE 577,566 872,190 332,296 693,734 7,500 2,483,287 2,175,801 4,659,088 HERMOSA BEACH 129,376 195,372 78,160 155,398 4,000 562,306 487,384 1,049,691 HIDDEN HILLS 11,405 17,222 11,267 13,699 1,000 54,593 42,964 97,556 HUNTINGTON PARK 359,072 542,239 208,404 431,293 7,500 1,548,508 1,352,691 2,901,199 INDUSTRY 2,874 4,340 6,430 3,452 1,000 18,096 10,827 28,924 INGLEWOOD 712,264 1,075,598 408,674 855,524 10,000 3,062,061 2,683,234 5,745,295 IRWINDALE 9,850 14,874 10,385 11,831 1,000 47,939 37,105 85,044 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 134,829 203,607 81,252 161,948 5,000 586,636 507,927 1,094,563 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 37,115 56,047 25,845 44,580 2,000 165,586 139,818 305,404 LAKEWOOD 540,163 815,706 311,088 648,808 7,500 2,323,265 2,034,896 4,358,161 LA MIRADA 323,158 488,005 188,040 388,156 6,000 1,393,359 1,217,398 2,610,756 LANCASTER 1,158,184 1,748,987 661,523 1,391,133 10,000 4,969,828 4,363,097 9,332,925 LA PUENTE 249,480 376,743 146,262 299,659 6,000 1,078,144 939,839 2,017,983 LA VERNE 215,837 325,938 127,186 259,249 6,000 934,209 813,098 1,747,307 LAWNDALE 208,592 314,998 123,078 250,547 6,000 903,215 785,807 1,689,022 LOMITA 137,388 207,472 82,703 165,022 5,000 597,585 517,568 1,115,152 LONG BEACH 3,045,917 4,599,674 1,731,921 3,658,552 10,000 13,046,063 11,474,541 24,520,604 LOS ANGELES 25,566,008 38,607,516 14,501,446 30,708,177 20,000 109,403,148 96,311,951 205,715,099 LYNWOOD 449,988 679,532 259,956 540,496 7,500 1,937,472 1,695,190 3,632,663 MALIBU 70,469 106,416 44,758 84,643 3,000 309,286 265,471 574,757 MANHATTAN BEACH 232,767 351,504 136,785 279,584 6,000 1,006,640 876,876 1,883,516 MAYWOOD 164,936 249,071 98,323 198,110 6,000 716,439 621,343 1,337,782 MONROVIA 248,443 375,177 145,674 298,414 6,000 1,073,709 935,933 2,009,642 MONTEBELLO 411,266 621,057 237,999 493,985 7,500 1,771,808 1,549,316 3,321,124 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 96 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code MONTEREY PARK 400,655 605,034 231,983 481,240 7,500 1,726,412 1,509,344 3,235,756 NORWALK 678,614 1,024,783 389,594 815,106 10,000 2,918,098 2,556,468 5,474,566 PALMDALE 1,111,141 1,677,947 634,848 1,334,629 10,000 4,768,565 4,185,878 8,954,443 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 87,635 132,339 54,492 105,262 3,000 382,728 330,139 712,867 PARAMOUNT 350,955 529,981 203,801 421,543 7,500 1,513,780 1,322,112 2,835,893 PASADENA 917,287 1,385,206 524,928 1,101,784 10,000 3,939,204 3,455,593 7,394,797 PICO RIVERA 407,828 615,865 236,050 489,855 7,500 1,757,097 1,536,363 3,293,460 POMONA 999,056 1,508,686 571,293 1,199,999 10,000 4,289,034 3,763,632 8,052,665 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 277,756 419,442 162,295 333,622 6,000 1,199,115 1,046,358 2,245,473 REDONDO BEACH 460,927 696,051 266,159 553,635 7,500 1,984,272 1,736,399 3,720,671 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 54,392 82,138 35,642 65,332 2,000 239,505 204,906 444,411 ROSEMEAD 335,455 506,575 195,013 402,927 7,500 1,447,469 1,263,723 2,711,193 SAN DIMAS 229,289 346,252 134,813 275,407 6,000 991,761 863,775 1,855,535 SAN FERNANDO 155,178 234,336 92,790 186,389 6,000 674,693 584,584 1,259,277 SAN GABRIEL 258,956 391,052 151,635 311,040 6,000 1,118,683 975,535 2,094,218 SAN MARINO 82,360 124,372 51,500 98,925 3,000 360,156 310,264 670,420 SANTA CLARITA 1,502,794 2,269,385 856,926 1,805,055 10,000 6,444,160 5,661,305 12,105,466 SANTA FE SPRINGS 123,123 185,929 74,614 147,887 4,000 535,552 463,826 999,378 SANTA MONICA 612,437 924,848 352,069 735,618 7,500 2,632,472 2,307,165 4,939,636 SIERRA MADRE 73,356 110,776 46,395 88,111 3,000 321,639 276,348 597,986 SIGNAL HILL 77,189 116,563 48,568 92,714 3,000 338,034 290,784 628,818 SOUTH EL MONTE 129,061 194,897 77,981 155,020 5,000 561,959 486,198 1,048,156 SOUTH GATE 611,964 924,134 351,801 735,051 7,500 2,630,450 2,305,385 4,935,835 SOUTH PASADENA 176,937 267,195 105,129 212,525 6,000 767,787 666,557 1,434,343 TEMPLE CITY 239,716 361,998 140,726 287,931 6,000 1,036,370 903,055 1,939,425 TORRANCE 963,713 1,455,314 551,252 1,157,548 10,000 4,137,827 3,630,488 7,768,316 VERNON 1,385 2,091 5,585 1,663 1,000 11,724 5,216 16,940 WALNUT 186,610 281,802 110,613 224,143 6,000 809,168 702,994 1,512,162 WEST COVINA 719,240 1,086,132 412,629 863,903 10,000 3,091,904 2,709,511 5,801,415 WEST HOLLYWOOD 234,243 353,733 137,623 281,357 6,000 1,012,956 882,438 1,895,395 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 53,461 80,731 35,114 64,213 2,000 235,519 201,396 436,914 WHITTIER 577,002 871,337 331,976 693,056 7,500 2,480,872 2,173,675 4,654,547 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 97 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 126,607 191,191 49,005 152,072 4,000 522,874 476,952 999,827 MADERA 432,061 652,460 155,655 518,963 7,500 1,766,638 1,627,655 3,394,293

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 13,931 21,038 13,495 16,733 1,000 66,196 52,481 118,677 CORTE MADERA 66,899 101,026 46,553 80,355 3,000 297,833 252,023 549,856 FAIRFAX 49,805 75,212 35,884 59,823 2,000 222,725 187,627 410,351 LARKSPUR 85,778 129,535 58,336 103,031 3,000 379,680 323,143 702,823 MILL VALLEY 92,662 139,930 62,632 111,299 3,000 409,522 349,074 758,597 NOVATO 348,704 526,582 222,432 418,840 7,500 1,524,058 1,313,633 2,837,691 ROSS 15,322 23,138 14,363 18,404 1,000 72,227 57,722 129,949 SAN ANSELMO 83,836 126,602 57,123 100,698 3,000 371,259 315,826 687,085 SAN RAFAEL 403,575 609,444 256,678 484,748 7,500 1,761,945 1,520,344 3,282,289 SAUSALITO 46,682 70,495 33,935 56,071 2,000 209,183 175,860 385,043 TIBURON 59,891 90,442 42,179 71,937 2,000 266,450 225,622 492,072

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 46,938 70,881 33,651 56,379 2,000 209,849 176,824 386,673 POINT ARENA 3,019 4,558 6,655 3,626 1,000 18,858 11,371 30,229 UKIAH 108,955 164,535 71,770 130,870 4,000 480,130 410,455 890,585 WILLITS 32,462 49,021 24,753 38,991 2,000 147,228 122,291 269,519

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 208,350 314,631 95,840 250,256 6,000 875,077 784,892 1,659,969 DOS PALOS 38,020 57,415 21,413 45,667 2,000 164,515 143,229 307,744 GUSTINE 39,884 60,229 22,228 47,906 2,000 172,246 150,250 322,496 LIVINGSTON 94,558 142,793 46,118 113,577 4,000 401,047 356,219 757,265 LOS BANOS 306,045 462,161 138,529 367,600 6,000 1,280,335 1,152,927 2,433,262 MERCED 584,397 882,505 260,158 701,939 7,500 2,436,500 2,201,535 4,638,035

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 17,888 27,013 15,968 22,967 1,000 84,835 67,387 152,223

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 48,329 72,982 65,774 1,910,068 2,000 2,099,152 182,065 2,281,217 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 98 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 20,756 31,343 13,715 24,930 1,000 91,744 78,190 169,935 DEL REY OAKS 10,348 15,627 9,245 12,430 1,000 48,650 38,984 87,634 GONZALES 56,013 84,586 28,860 67,279 2,000 238,739 211,012 449,751 GREENFIELD 128,838 194,560 60,142 154,752 4,000 542,292 485,357 1,027,649 KING CITY 87,786 132,567 42,508 105,443 3,000 371,305 330,707 702,012 MARINA 142,933 215,845 66,197 171,682 6,000 602,657 538,456 1,141,113 MONTEREY 186,754 282,020 85,020 224,317 6,000 784,110 703,538 1,487,648 PACIFIC GROVE 98,174 148,253 46,970 117,920 4,000 415,318 369,839 785,157 SALINAS 1,060,266 1,601,120 460,235 1,273,521 10,000 4,405,142 3,994,222 8,399,364 SAND CITY 2,441 3,686 5,849 2,932 1,000 15,908 9,196 25,104 SEASIDE 214,629 324,114 96,994 257,799 6,000 899,536 808,550 1,708,086 SOLEDAD 181,124 273,517 82,601 217,554 6,000 760,797 682,328 1,443,125

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 142,120 214,616 70,294 170,704 5,000 602,734 535,391 1,138,125 CALISTOGA 34,240 51,707 20,579 41,127 2,000 149,654 128,990 278,644 NAPA 509,341 769,162 239,522 611,787 7,500 2,137,313 1,918,785 4,056,097 SAINT HELENA 35,789 54,045 21,293 42,987 2,000 156,115 134,824 290,939 YOUNTVILLE 19,614 29,619 13,839 23,559 1,000 87,630 73,889 161,519

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 89,355 134,935 115,282 107,327 3,000 449,899 336,615 786,514 NEVADA CITY 21,976 33,186 31,972 26,396 1,000 114,531 82,788 197,319 TRUCKEE 112,210 169,450 143,542 1,744,702 4,000 2,173,903 422,716 2,596,620 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 99 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 340,226 513,779 215,208 408,657 7,500 1,485,370 1,281,695 2,767,065 ANAHEIM 2,269,568 3,427,301 1,408,384 2,726,054 10,000 9,841,307 8,549,890 18,391,197 BREA 309,864 467,929 196,431 372,187 6,000 1,352,411 1,167,314 2,519,725 BUENA PARK 552,946 835,010 346,762 664,162 7,500 2,406,379 2,083,051 4,489,430COSTA MESA 738,171 1,114,720 461,312 886,642 10,000 3,210,845 2,780,829 5,991,674 CYPRESS 330,659 499,331 209,291 397,165 6,000 1,442,446 1,245,653 2,688,099 DANA POINT 217,609 328,613 139,377 261,377 6,000 952,976 819,773 1,772,748 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 375,123 566,477 236,790 450,572 7,500 1,636,461 1,413,157 3,049,618 FULLERTON 947,439 1,430,739 590,731 1,138,001 10,000 4,116,910 3,569,182 7,686,093 GARDEN GROVE 1,128,964 1,704,861 702,993 1,356,036 10,000 4,902,853 4,253,018 9,155,871 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,302,325 1,966,655 810,205 1,564,265 10,000 5,653,451 4,906,102 10,559,553 IRVINE 2,035,857 3,074,370 1,263,848 2,445,335 10,000 8,829,409 7,669,454 16,498,863 LAGUNA BEACH 150,952 227,954 98,154 181,313 5,000 663,374 568,664 1,232,038 LAGUNA HILLS 205,987 311,064 132,190 247,418 6,000 902,659 775,993 1,678,652 LAGUNA NIGUEL 423,498 639,528 266,706 508,677 7,500 1,845,909 1,595,395 3,441,304 LAGUNA WOODS 116,521 175,960 76,861 139,957 4,000 513,300 438,957 952,257 LA HABRA 411,968 622,118 259,576 494,829 7,500 1,795,991 1,551,961 3,347,952 LAKE FOREST 569,416 859,882 356,948 683,945 7,500 2,477,692 2,145,099 4,622,790 LA PALMA 102,262 154,427 68,043 122,830 4,000 451,562 385,240 836,802 LOS ALAMITOS 78,061 117,881 53,076 93,762 3,000 345,781 294,072 639,853 MISSION VIEJO 614,629 928,157 384,909 738,251 7,500 2,673,446 2,315,421 4,988,867 NEWPORT BEACH 558,793 843,839 350,378 671,184 7,500 2,431,694 2,105,077 4,536,770 ORANGE 916,021 1,383,293 571,301 1,100,263 10,000 3,980,877 3,450,822 7,431,699 PLACENTIA 339,990 513,422 215,062 408,373 7,500 1,484,347 1,280,805 2,765,152 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 314,641 475,143 199,385 377,925 6,000 1,373,094 1,185,311 2,558,405SAN CLEMENTE 420,938 635,664 265,124 505,603 7,500 1,834,829 1,585,754 3,420,583 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 229,591 346,708 146,787 275,769 6,000 1,004,855 864,912 1,869,767 SANTA ANA 2,036,907 3,075,955 1,264,498 2,446,596 10,000 8,833,955 7,673,409 16,507,364 SEAL BEACH 165,638 250,131 107,236 198,953 5,000 726,958 623,988 1,350,947 STANTON 257,722 389,189 164,185 309,558 6,000 1,126,654 970,887 2,097,542 TUSTIN 527,577 796,700 331,073 633,690 7,500 2,296,541 1,987,482 4,284,023 VILLA PARK 38,473 58,098 28,593 46,211 2,000 173,376 144,935 318,310 WESTMINSTER 597,128 901,729 374,086 717,230 7,500 2,597,673 2,249,492 4,847,165 YORBA LINDA 446,839 674,776 281,141 536,713 7,500 1,946,968 1,683,325 3,630,293 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
City Council/RSA Agenda 100 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 90,431 136,560 61,709 108,619 3,000 400,320 340,670 740,989 COLFAX 13,400 20,235 13,233 16,095 1,000 63,962 50,479 114,440 LINCOLN 336,315 507,873 216,447 403,959 6,000 1,470,594 1,266,962 2,737,556 LOOMIS 44,713 67,522 32,939 53,707 2,000 200,881 168,444 369,325 ROCKLIN 470,252 710,132 300,735 564,835 7,500 2,053,454 1,771,526 3,824,981 ROSEVILLE 991,083 1,496,646 628,501 1,190,423 10,000 4,316,653 3,733,596 8,050,249

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 13,780 20,810 9,077 130,102 1,000 174,769 51,913 226,681

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 202,614 305,970 130,037 243,367 6,000 887,989 763,287 1,651,276 BEAUMONT 358,875 541,941 226,623 431,057 7,500 1,565,996 1,351,950 2,917,946 BLYTHE 121,961 184,175 80,185 146,492 5,000 537,812 459,450 997,263 CALIMESA 71,519 108,002 49,006 85,904 2,000 316,431 269,426 585,857 CANYON LAKE 72,635 109,686 49,696 87,244 3,000 322,261 273,628 595,889 CATHEDRAL CITY 340,173 513,700 215,064 408,594 7,500 1,485,030 1,281,497 2,766,527 COACHELLA 276,640 417,758 175,793 332,282 6,000 1,208,473 1,042,156 2,250,629 CORONA 1,028,775 1,553,565 640,693 1,235,696 10,000 4,468,729 3,875,589 8,344,319 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 213,717 322,737 136,900 256,703 6,000 936,058 805,113 1,741,171 EASTVALE 458,873 692,950 288,433 551,168 7,500 1,998,923 1,728,662 3,727,585 HEMET 588,256 888,332 368,405 706,574 7,500 2,559,066 2,216,070 4,775,137 INDIAN WELLS 31,248 47,188 24,115 37,533 2,000 142,084 117,718 259,802 INDIO 584,916 883,288 366,340 702,562 7,500 2,544,606 2,203,488 4,748,094 JURUPA VALLEY 691,528 1,044,285 432,238 830,618 10,000 3,008,670 2,605,118 5,613,787 LAKE ELSINORE 469,937 709,657 295,271 564,457 7,500 2,046,821 1,770,340 3,817,161 LA QUINTA 248,437 375,167 158,361 298,406 6,000 1,086,370 935,908 2,022,279 MENIFEE 699,685 1,056,602 437,280 840,415 7,500 3,041,482 2,635,845 5,677,327 MORENO VALLEY 1,374,126 2,075,083 854,157 1,650,508 10,000 5,963,874 5,176,591 11,140,465 MURRIETA 729,581 1,101,749 455,759 876,324 10,000 3,173,414 2,748,470 5,921,884 NORCO 174,936 264,173 112,929 210,121 6,000 768,159 659,017 1,427,176 PALM DESERT 333,933 504,276 211,206 401,098 7,500 1,458,013 1,257,988 2,716,001 PALM SPRINGS 291,333 439,945 184,875 349,929 6,000 1,272,081 1,097,504 2,369,585 PERRIS 517,675 781,747 324,779 621,797 7,500 2,253,498 1,950,180 4,203,677 RANCHO MIRAGE 110,268 166,516 72,957 132,446 4,000 486,187 415,399 901,586 RIVERSIDE 2,085,708 3,149,651 1,293,990 2,505,213 10,000 9,044,562 7,857,254 16,901,816 SAN JACINTO 358,239 540,980 226,230 430,292 7,500 1,563,241 1,349,552 2,912,793 TEMECULA 721,326 1,089,283 450,657 866,409 10,000 3,137,676 2,717,372 5,855,048 WILDOMAR 240,956 363,871 153,737 289,420 6,000 1,053,984 907,727 1,961,711 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 101 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 575,585 869,197 377,858 691,354 7,500 2,521,493 2,168,336 4,689,829 ELK GROVE 1,161,288 1,753,674 757,474 1,394,861 10,000 5,077,297 4,374,790 9,452,087 FOLSOM 555,092 838,250 364,575 666,739 7,500 2,432,156 2,091,134 4,523,290 GALT 167,114 252,361 113,113 200,726 6,000 739,314 629,550 1,368,865 ISLETON 5,217 7,878 8,181 6,266 1,000 28,542 19,653 48,195 RANCHO CORDOVA 527,315 796,304 346,572 633,375 7,500 2,311,066 1,986,494 4,297,560 SACRAMENTO 3,413,966 5,155,468 2,217,517 4,100,627 20,000 14,907,578 12,861,050 27,768,628

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 279,239 421,682 164,497 335,403 6,000 1,206,820 1,051,945 2,258,765 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 13,734 20,740 12,655 16,497 1,000 64,626 51,739 116,365

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 240,576 363,296 150,475 288,963 6,000 1,049,309 906,293 1,955,603 APPLE VALLEY 498,764 753,188 306,814 599,081 7,500 2,165,347 1,878,936 4,044,283 BARSTOW 167,547 253,015 106,254 201,247 5,000 733,063 631,182 1,364,245 BIG BEAR LAKE 33,118 50,012 24,854 415,306 2,000 525,290 124,763 650,053 CHINO 603,690 911,639 370,350 725,112 7,500 2,618,290 2,274,212 4,892,502 CHINO HILLS 514,932 777,605 316,605 618,502 7,500 2,235,144 1,939,847 4,174,991 COLTON 353,179 533,340 218,659 424,215 7,500 1,536,894 1,330,493 2,867,386 FONTANA 1,396,450 2,108,795 850,386 1,677,322 10,000 6,042,953 5,260,689 11,303,643 GRAND TERRACE 86,238 130,228 57,019 103,583 3,000 380,068 324,873 704,941 HESPERIA 658,325 994,144 403,433 790,736 7,500 2,854,137 2,480,033 5,334,170 HIGHLAND 373,600 564,178 231,025 448,744 7,500 1,625,046 1,407,422 3,032,468 LOMA LINDA 166,340 251,192 105,523 199,796 5,000 727,851 626,633 1,354,484 MONTCLAIR 249,769 377,179 156,042 300,006 6,000 1,088,995 940,926 2,029,921 NEEDLES 32,351 48,853 24,389 38,857 2,000 146,450 121,871 268,321 ONTARIO 1,177,982 1,778,883 718,098 1,414,913 10,000 5,099,876 4,437,678 9,537,554 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,144,909 1,728,940 698,072 1,375,188 10,000 4,957,110 4,313,088 9,270,198 REDLANDS 478,126 722,024 294,318 574,293 7,500 2,076,260 1,801,191 3,877,451 RIALTO 683,359 1,031,948 418,591 820,805 10,000 2,964,703 2,574,341 5,539,044 SAN BERNARDINO 1,466,243 2,214,190 892,648 1,761,153 10,000 6,344,235 5,523,614 11,867,849 TWENTYNINE PALMS 181,669 274,340 114,805 218,208 6,000 795,022 684,380 1,479,401 UPLAND 519,309 784,215 319,255 623,759 7,500 2,254,038 1,956,335 4,210,373 VICTORVILLE 896,112 1,353,228 547,419 1,076,349 10,000 3,883,108 3,375,820 7,258,928 YUCAIPA 359,400 542,734 222,426 431,687 7,500 1,563,747 1,353,927 2,917,675 YUCCA VALLEY 143,137 216,152 91,473 171,926 5,000 627,688 539,223 1,166,910 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 102 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 758,467 1,145,370 489,981 911,020 10,000 3,314,838 2,857,289 6,172,127 CHULA VISTA 1,816,260 2,742,754 1,166,635 2,181,570 10,000 7,917,219 6,842,191 14,759,410 CORONADO 154,719 233,642 103,771 185,838 5,000 682,970 582,854 1,265,823 DEL MAR 25,861 39,053 21,343 31,062 1,000 118,318 97,422 215,741 EL CAJON 696,693 1,052,084 450,464 836,821 10,000 3,046,061 2,624,572 5,670,634 ENCINITAS 403,661 609,572 263,016 484,850 7,500 1,768,599 1,520,665 3,289,265 ESCONDIDO 989,948 1,494,932 638,056 1,189,059 10,000 4,321,994 3,729,320 8,051,314 IMPERIAL BEACH 173,945 262,677 116,070 208,931 6,000 767,623 655,284 1,422,907 LA MESA 396,876 599,326 258,676 476,700 7,500 1,739,078 1,495,105 3,234,183 LEMON GROVE 179,241 270,673 119,458 215,292 6,000 790,664 675,233 1,465,897 NATIONAL CITY 403,372 609,136 262,831 484,503 7,500 1,767,343 1,519,578 3,286,921 OCEANSIDE 1,135,539 1,714,790 731,188 1,363,933 10,000 4,955,450 4,277,788 9,233,238 POWAY 319,956 483,169 209,471 384,310 6,000 1,402,906 1,205,334 2,608,240 SAN DIEGO 9,058,482 13,679,316 5,799,382 10,880,443 20,000 39,437,623 34,125,003 73,562,626 SAN MARCOS 617,601 932,646 399,871 741,821 7,500 2,699,439 2,326,619 5,026,059 SANTEE 389,388 588,020 253,886 467,707 7,500 1,706,501 1,466,899 3,173,400 SOLANA BEACH 84,630 127,801 58,937 101,652 3,000 376,019 318,817 694,836 VISTA 658,108 993,817 425,782 790,476 10,000 2,878,183 2,479,217 5,357,400

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 5,734,947 8,660,408 2,198,109 6,888,435 20,000 23,501,899 21,604,623 45,106,522

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 48,815 73,716 33,132 58,633 2,000 216,295 183,894 400,189 LATHROP 205,594 310,469 124,126 246,945 6,000 893,134 774,510 1,667,644 LODI 436,832 659,664 258,335 524,693 7,500 1,887,024 1,645,626 3,532,650 MANTECA 569,968 860,715 335,607 684,607 7,500 2,458,396 2,147,175 4,605,571 RIPON 104,854 158,341 65,657 125,944 4,000 458,796 395,005 853,800 STOCKTON 2,122,514 3,205,232 1,236,699 2,549,422 10,000 9,123,868 7,995,909 17,119,777 TRACY 620,357 936,808 364,853 745,131 7,500 2,674,650 2,337,002 5,011,652

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 120,314 181,688 88,675 144,513 4,000 539,190 453,246 992,436 ATASCADERO 201,985 305,019 145,611 242,610 6,000 901,225 760,914 1,662,138 EL PASO DE ROBLES 205,797 310,776 148,268 247,190 6,000 918,032 775,276 1,693,308 GROVER BEACH 83,698 126,394 63,149 100,533 3,000 376,773 315,307 692,080 MORRO BAY 69,229 104,543 53,062 83,153 3,000 312,988 260,799 573,786 PISMO BEACH 52,811 79,750 41,616 63,433 2,000 239,610 198,948 438,559 SAN LUIS OBISPO 312,698 472,209 222,793 375,592 6,000 1,389,293 1,177,994 2,567,287 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 103 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 45,809 69,177 33,072 55,023 2,000 205,082 172,572 377,653 BELMONT 184,556 278,700 118,703 221,676 6,000 809,635 695,257 1,504,892 BRISBANE 31,845 48,090 24,454 38,250 1,000 143,640 119,967 263,607 BURLINGAME 205,082 309,696 131,371 246,331 6,000 898,480 772,582 1,671,061 COLMA 9,561 14,438 10,701 11,484 1,000 47,183 36,017 83,201 DALY CITY 688,136 1,039,162 429,499 826,543 10,000 2,993,340 2,592,337 5,585,677 EAST PALO ALTO 197,142 297,706 126,471 236,794 6,000 864,112 742,670 1,606,782 FOSTER CITY 221,119 333,915 141,269 265,594 6,000 967,897 832,998 1,800,895 HALF MOON BAY 77,136 116,484 52,406 92,651 3,000 341,678 290,586 632,264 HILLSBOROUGH 74,656 112,738 50,876 89,671 3,000 330,941 281,242 612,183 MENLO PARK 224,138 338,473 143,132 269,219 6,000 980,962 844,369 1,825,331 MILLBRAE 153,078 231,165 99,276 183,867 5,000 672,386 576,674 1,249,059 PACIFICA 253,831 383,313 161,458 304,885 6,000 1,109,486 956,228 2,065,714 PORTOLA VALLEY 29,129 43,988 22,777 34,987 1,000 131,881 109,733 241,614 REDWOOD CITY 547,801 827,241 342,888 657,982 7,500 2,383,413 2,063,670 4,447,083 SAN BRUNO 288,826 436,159 183,056 346,918 6,000 1,260,959 1,088,061 2,349,020 SAN CARLOS 201,768 304,692 129,326 242,350 6,000 884,136 760,098 1,644,234 SAN MATEO 693,937 1,047,922 433,079 833,510 10,000 3,018,448 2,614,190 5,632,638 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 434,922 656,781 273,222 522,399 7,500 1,894,824 1,638,433 3,533,257 WOODSIDE 34,838 52,609 26,301 41,845 2,000 157,592 131,240 288,831

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 33,794 51,033 21,978 40,591 2,000 149,396 127,309 276,706 CARPINTERIA 86,323 130,357 48,678 103,685 3,000 372,044 325,195 697,239 GOLETA 214,544 323,986 113,854 257,696 6,000 916,080 808,228 1,724,308GUADALUPE 56,066 84,665 33,298 67,342 2,000 243,372 211,210 454,581 LOMPOC 291,313 439,915 152,876 349,906 6,000 1,240,009 1,097,430 2,337,439 SANTA BARBARA 574,016 866,829 296,575 689,470 7,500 2,434,390 2,162,428 4,596,818 SANTA MARIA 721,228 1,089,135 371,404 866,291 10,000 3,058,057 2,717,001 5,775,059 SOLVANG 38,191 57,672 24,213 45,872 2,000 167,948 143,872 311,820 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 104 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 287,979 434,881 172,304 345,902 6,000 1,247,065 1,084,872 2,331,938 CUPERTINO 397,374 600,079 235,933 477,299 7,500 1,718,186 1,496,983 3,215,170 GILROY 393,555 594,312 233,712 472,712 7,500 1,701,791 1,482,596 3,184,388 LOS ALTOS 207,798 313,799 125,666 249,594 6,000 902,857 782,816 1,685,673 LOS ALTOS HILLS 55,797 84,259 37,254 67,019 2,000 246,329 210,196 456,525 LOS GATOS 220,260 332,617 132,914 264,561 6,000 956,352 829,760 1,786,111 MILPITAS 538,175 812,704 317,830 646,420 7,500 2,322,628 2,027,406 4,350,034 MONTE SERENO 22,895 34,574 18,117 27,500 1,000 104,085 86,249 190,334 MORGAN HILL 304,811 460,298 182,094 366,118 6,000 1,319,321 1,148,280 2,467,601 MOUNTAIN VIEW 550,315 831,036 324,891 661,001 7,500 2,374,743 2,073,138 4,447,881 PALO ALTO 449,496 678,789 266,250 539,905 7,500 1,941,940 1,693,336 3,635,276 SAN JOSE 6,665,837 10,066,156 3,881,994 8,006,558 20,000 28,640,545 25,111,461 53,752,005 SANTA CLARA 853,892 1,289,471 501,467 1,025,638 10,000 3,680,468 3,216,770 6,897,239 SARATOGA 204,760 309,211 123,899 245,944 6,000 889,814 771,370 1,661,185 SUNNYVALE 1,025,206 1,548,174 601,112 1,231,408 10,000 4,415,900 3,862,142 8,278,042

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 64,655 97,637 40,429 77,660 3,000 283,380 243,569 526,949 SANTA CRUZ 424,764 641,441 238,871 510,198 7,500 1,822,774 1,600,166 3,422,939 SCOTTS VALLEY 80,634 121,766 49,234 96,852 3,000 351,485 303,762 655,248 WATSONVILLE 339,753 513,066 192,025 408,089 7,500 1,460,433 1,279,915 2,740,348

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 73,258 110,628 60,067 87,993 3,000 334,946 275,977 610,922 REDDING 615,751 929,852 469,333 739,598 7,500 2,762,034 2,319,648 5,081,682 SHASTA LAKE 67,825 102,423 55,968 81,466 3,000 310,682 255,508 566,191

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 4,843 7,313 6,391 22,072 1,000 41,619 18,244 59,862

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 5,637 8,512 8,909 6,770 1,000 30,828 21,235 52,063 DUNSMUIR 11,188 16,895 12,955 39,297 1,000 81,335 42,148 123,483 ETNA 4,488 6,778 8,072 5,391 1,000 25,729 16,909 42,638 FORT JONES 4,554 6,877 8,120 5,470 1,000 26,021 17,156 43,176 MONTAGUE 8,071 12,188 10,683 9,695 1,000 41,638 30,406 72,044 MOUNT SHASTA 21,287 32,146 20,317 94,005 1,000 168,754 80,192 248,947 TULELAKE 5,912 8,928 9,110 7,102 1,000 32,052 22,273 54,325 WEED 19,043 28,757 18,681 22,873 1,000 90,354 71,738 162,092 YREKA 51,059 77,105 42,018 61,994 2,000 234,176 192,348 426,524 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 105 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 177,745 268,414 116,279 213,495 6,000 781,933 669,597 1,451,530 DIXON 125,222 189,100 83,338 150,409 4,000 552,069 471,736 1,023,805 FAIRFIELD 790,759 1,194,134 500,755 949,807 10,000 3,445,454 2,978,937 6,424,391 RIO VISTA 65,554 98,994 45,915 78,739 2,000 291,203 246,955 538,158 SUISUN CITY 193,316 291,929 126,046 232,198 6,000 849,489 728,258 1,577,747 VACAVILLE 671,252 1,013,665 425,802 806,263 7,500 2,924,481 2,528,732 5,453,213 VALLEJO 825,439 1,246,505 522,506 991,462 10,000 3,595,911 3,109,583 6,705,495

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 59,104 89,253 41,581 70,992 2,000 262,930 222,655 485,585 COTATI 49,740 75,113 35,754 59,744 2,000 222,350 187,379 409,730 HEALDSBURG 74,190 112,035 50,969 89,112 3,000 329,306 279,487 608,793 PETALUMA 392,512 592,737 249,063 471,459 7,500 1,713,271 1,478,666 3,191,936 ROHNERT PARK 289,141 436,635 184,735 347,297 6,000 1,263,807 1,089,248 2,353,055SANTA ROSA 1,168,165 1,764,059 731,759 1,403,122 10,000 5,077,104 4,400,697 9,477,801 SEBASTOPOL 49,359 74,538 35,517 59,287 2,000 220,701 185,946 406,647 SONOMA 70,732 106,813 48,817 84,958 3,000 314,319 266,459 580,779 WINDSOR 171,996 259,733 111,835 206,590 6,000 756,155 647,942 1,404,097

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 321,524 485,537 189,721 386,193 6,000 1,388,976 1,211,242 2,600,218 HUGHSON 49,182 74,270 33,086 59,074 2,000 217,613 185,278 402,891 MODESTO 1,437,239 2,170,391 831,411 1,726,316 10,000 6,175,357 5,414,350 11,589,707 NEWMAN 81,080 122,440 51,432 97,388 3,000 355,340 305,443 660,783 OAKDALE 152,087 229,669 92,271 182,677 5,000 661,704 572,941 1,234,645 PATTERSON 159,916 241,490 96,774 192,080 5,000 695,260 602,432 1,297,692 RIVERBANK 162,796 245,841 98,430 195,540 6,000 708,607 613,284 1,321,892 TURLOCK 473,021 714,314 276,852 568,161 7,500 2,039,848 1,781,958 3,821,807WATERFORD 59,708 90,165 39,140 71,717 2,000 262,729 224,929 487,659

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 61,643 93,088 39,461 74,042 2,000 270,234 232,222 502,456 YUBA CITY 460,527 695,447 263,747 553,154 7,500 1,980,375 1,734,891 3,715,266

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 54,012 81,564 34,128 64,875 2,000 236,579 203,472 440,051 RED BLUFF 97,268 146,886 57,616 116,832 3,000 421,602 366,428 788,031 TEHAMA 2,854 4,311 6,350 3,429 1,000 17,944 10,753 28,697

TRINITY COUNTY
18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 106 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2023-24 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2023 TOTAL Road Mntnc Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTAL Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 164,883 248,992 93,309 198,046 6,000 711,231 621,145 1,332,376 EXETER 67,943 102,601 41,272 81,608 3,000 296,424 255,953 552,377 FARMERSVILLE 68,140 102,898 41,377 81,845 3,000 297,260 256,695 553,955 LINDSAY 83,318 125,819 49,525 100,075 3,000 361,737 313,873 675,610 PORTERVILLE 411,115 620,829 225,487 493,804 7,500 1,758,735 1,548,748 3,307,483 TULARE 455,809 688,322 249,478 547,487 7,500 1,948,596 1,717,117 3,665,713 VISALIA 932,399 1,408,027 505,312 1,119,936 10,000 3,975,674 3,512,523 7,488,197 WOODLAKE 50,186 75,787 31,740 60,280 2,000 219,993 189,060 409,053

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 34,116 51,519 34,125 40,978 1,000 161,737 128,521 290,257

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 464,293 701,135 295,204 557,678 7,500 2,025,810 1,749,080 3,774,890 FILLMORE 108,069 163,197 72,395 129,806 4,000 477,466 407,118 884,584 MOORPARK 237,616 358,827 153,423 285,409 6,000 1,041,274 895,145 1,936,419 OJAI 50,232 75,856 36,219 60,335 2,000 224,642 189,233 413,876 OXNARD 1,323,218 1,998,207 832,439 1,589,361 10,000 5,753,225 4,984,811 10,738,036 PORT HUENEME 145,650 219,948 95,900 174,945 5,000 641,443 548,690 1,190,133 SAN BUENAVENTURA 722,232 1,090,651 456,538 867,497 10,000 3,146,917 2,720,784 5,867,701 SANTA PAULA 202,713 306,119 131,592 243,485 6,000 889,909 763,658 1,653,566 SIMI VALLEY 827,801 1,250,072 522,568 994,299 10,000 3,604,741 3,118,483 6,723,224 THOUSAND OAKS 830,866 1,254,700 524,485 997,980 10,000 3,618,031 3,130,027 6,748,058

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 425,670 642,808 268,545 511,286 7,500 1,855,809 1,603,577 3,459,386 WEST SACRAMENTO 346,716 523,579 219,625 416,452 7,500 1,513,872 1,306,143 2,820,015 WINTERS 48,703 73,547 34,976 58,499 2,000 217,725 183,474 401,199 WOODLAND 394,618 595,917 249,306 473,989 7,500 1,721,330 1,486,601 3,207,931

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 86,546 130,694 46,712 103,953 3,000 370,905 326,035 696,941 WHEATLAND 24,411 36,863 16,621 29,320 1,000 108,215 91,959 200,174 Statewide Total $ 217,110,500 327,861,000 $ 128,363,518 $ 266,002,500 $ 2,709,500 $ 942,047,018 $ 817,896,000 $ 1,759,943,018 $ Notes:

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 18 January 2023 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16 City Council/RSA Agenda 107 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL ALAMEDA $8,424,253 $13,846,770 $6,300,840 $424,234 $21,285,261 $50,281,357 ALPINE $163,527 $289,769 $137,354 $21,329 $413,179 $1,025,158 AMADOR $820,792 $723,011 $532,171 $196,411 $2,073,866 $4,346,251 BUTTE $2,749,767 $2,470,137 $1,782,845 $418,171 $6,947,739 $14,368,659 CALAVERAS $1,240,592 $1,019,303 $804,353 $326,399 $3,134,561 $6,525,209 COLUSA $972,029 $612,606 $630,227 $120,192 $2,455,991 $4,791,046 CONTRA COSTA $7,117,934 $11,248,483 $5,365,043 $903,001 $17,984,631 $42,619,093 DEL NORTE $503,997 $335,340 $326,772 $112,821 $1,273,431 $2,552,361 EL DORADO $2,621,965 $3,646,405 $1,977,135 $831,681 $6,624,825 $15,702,011 FRESNO $9,224,564 $9,748,714 $5,980,858 $1,218,066 $23,307,378 $49,479,581 GLENN $1,181,786 $749,872 $766,225 $141,211 $2,985,977 $5,825,071 HUMBOLDT $2,236,327 $1,722,574 $1,449,950 $406,481 $5,650,448 $11,465,780 IMPERIAL $4,151,128 $2,404,135 $2,691,434 $428,999 $10,488,506 $20,164,203 INYO $1,375,534 $962,477 $891,844 $123,411 $3,475,512 $6,828,777 KERN $8,526,011 $8,747,127 $5,527,942 $1,931,730 $21,542,367 $46,275,177 KINGS $1,762,829 $1,340,896 $1,142,951 $226,772 $4,454,076 $8,927,524 LAKE $1,228,302 $999,345 $796,385 $339,955 $3,103,507 $6,467,494 LASSEN $1,183,967 $931,183 $767,640 $123,885 $2,991,488 $5,998,163 LOS ANGELES $51,699,081 $84,333,189 $38,409,822 $2,662,635 $130,626,227 $307,730,954 MADERA $2,597,310 $1,735,551 $1,683,998 $500,768 $6,562,531 $13,080,158 MARIN $1,916,971 $2,586,707 $1,272,323 $295,024 $4,843,541 $10,914,565 MARIPOSA $782,748 $533,923 $507,504 $130,141 $1,977,743 $3,932,060 MENDOCINO $1,821,857 $1,311,065 $1,181,223 $398,146 $4,603,222 $9,315,514 MERCED $3,486,009 $2,779,095 $2,260,197 $594,956 $8,807,976 $17,928,233 MODOC $1,158,244 $865,745 $750,961 $62,110 $2,926,493 $5,763,553 MONO $850,247 $774,923 $551,268 $31,491 $2,148,288 $4,356,216 MONTEREY $3,873,954 $4,410,416 $2,511,725 $881,540 $9,788,182 $21,465,818 NAPA $1,342,920 $1,579,939 $870,699 $311,462 $3,393,109 $7,498,129 NEVADA $1,412,876 $1,691,803 $916,055 $311,988 $3,569,863 $7,902,585 ORANGE $17,852,694 $30,575,820 $13,827,810 $743,297 $45,107,767 $108,107,387 PLACER $3,982,110 $6,140,997 $3,086,953 $850,757 $10,061,457 $24,122,274 PLUMAS $949,589 $1,042,475 $615,677 $150,920 $2,399,292 $5,157,954 RIVERSIDE $15,668,504 $23,296,491 $10,994,263 $1,604,821 $39,589,050 $91,153,129 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2022-23
CSAC Budget Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/17/23 City Council/RSA Agenda 108 Tuesday, June 13, 2023 COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL SACRAMENTO $10,985,229 $15,013,065 $7,577,779 $2,150,127 $27,755,987 $63,482,187 SAN BENITO $933,794 $802,907 $605,437 $164,457 $2,359,384 $4,865,979 SAN BERNARDINO $14,845,681 $21,987,285 $10,355,235 $1,466,669 $37,510,054 $86,164,924 SAN DIEGO $20,452,670 $32,163,121 $15,083,011 $1,998,947 $51,677,034 $121,374,783 SAN FRANCISCO* $3,928,877 $5,097,347 $2,547,335 $9,600 $9,926,953 $21,510,110 SAN JOAQUIN $6,274,962 $7,849,691 $4,068,448 $928,467 $15,854,722 $34,976,289 SAN LUIS OBISPO $3,387,210 $3,405,496 $2,196,139 $671,909 $8,558,344 $18,219,098 SAN MATEO $4,493,732 $7,267,787 $3,333,328 $281,992 $11,354,152 $26,730,990 SANTA BARBARA $3,416,869 $4,454,837 $2,326,454 $814,434 $8,633,282 $19,645,876 SANTA CLARA $10,482,261 $17,144,179 $7,703,669 $304,145 $26,485,154 $62,119,407 SANTA CRUZ $2,224,596 $2,836,427 $1,536,333 $643,270 $5,620,808 $12,861,434 SHASTA $2,614,433 $2,527,286 $1,695,099 $409,709 $6,605,795 $13,852,322 SIERRA $464,376 $432,887 $301,084 $35,249 $1,173,323 $2,406,920 SISKIYOU $1,886,377 $1,551,811 $1,223,055 $204,392 $4,766,241 $9,631,875 SOLANO $3,266,907 $4,632,192 $2,133,453 $199,945 $8,254,377 $18,486,874 SONOMA $4,732,712 $5,739,638 $3,068,511 $931,619 $11,957,975 $26,430,455 STANISLAUS $4,883,662 $5,682,992 $3,166,381 $728,308 $12,339,375 $26,800,719 SUTTER $1,501,028 $1,200,322 $973,210 $208,620 $3,792,594 $7,675,774 TEHAMA $1,657,713 $1,012,590 $1,074,798 $262,618 $4,188,483 $8,196,202 TRINITY $871,334 $693,917 $564,940 $91,908 $2,201,569 $4,423,667 TULARE $5,877,867 $4,749,175 $3,810,986 $750,783 $14,851,397 $30,040,208 TUOLUMNE $1,151,936 $1,051,002 $746,872 $322,811 $2,910,555 $6,183,177 VENTURA $5,543,639 $8,733,561 $4,131,071 $623,054 $14,006,916 $33,038,240 YOLO $2,055,874 $2,183,558 $1,332,951 $176,963 $5,194,503 $10,943,849 YUBA $1,188,341 $892,638 $770,475 $290,680 $3,002,539 $6,144,675 TOTALS $284,002,500 $384,562,000 $199,638,500 $32,495,481 $717,579,000 $1,618,277,481 * county share only
County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2022-23
CSAC Budget Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/17/23 City Council/RSA Agenda 109 Tuesday, June 13, 2023 COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL ALAMEDA $9,725,211 $15,108,069 $6,863,333 $461,226 $24,260,924 $56,418,763 ALPINE $188,781 $313,681 $148,142 $22,375 $470,941 $1,143,920 AMADOR $947,547 $788,091 $577,849 $213,077 $2,363,791 $4,890,356 BUTTE $3,174,414 $2,673,837 $1,935,875 $454,622 $7,919,028 $16,157,775 CALAVERAS $1,432,177 $1,084,427 $873,395 $354,662 $3,572,770 $7,317,431 COLUSA $1,122,140 $620,683 $684,322 $130,059 $2,799,337 $5,356,541 CONTRA COSTA $8,217,157 $12,268,909 $5,841,642 $982,706 $20,498,869 $47,809,283 DEL NORTE $581,829 $362,282 $354,821 $122,030 $1,451,456 $2,872,417 EL DORADO $3,026,875 $3,768,771 $2,060,325 $905,023 $7,550,970 $17,311,964 FRESNO $10,649,114 $10,587,267 $6,494,225 $1,325,879 $26,565,732 $55,622,216 GLENN $1,364,289 $757,307 $831,994 $152,953 $3,403,414 $6,509,957 HUMBOLDT $2,581,683 $1,855,243 $1,574,406 $441,889 $6,440,377 $12,893,597 IMPERIAL $4,792,186 $2,607,427 $2,922,453 $466,416 $11,954,792 $22,743,274 INYO $1,587,957 $974,597 $968,395 $133,565 $3,961,386 $7,625,900 KERN $9,842,682 $9,535,991 $6,002,433 $2,103,212 $24,553,974 $52,038,292 KINGS $2,035,062 $1,461,504 $1,241,057 $246,147 $5,076,753 $10,060,523 LAKE $1,417,989 $1,092,585 $864,742 $369,428 $3,537,375 $7,282,120 LASSEN $1,366,807 $943,161 $833,530 $134,081 $3,409,696 $6,687,276 LOS ANGELES $59,682,969 $92,036,351 $41,850,010 $2,899,325 $148,887,674 $345,356,330 MADERA $2,998,413 $1,891,243 $1,828,543 $544,588 $7,479,968 $14,742,755 MARIN $2,213,008 $2,819,342 $1,384,115 $320,488 $5,520,664 $12,257,618 MARIPOSA $903,628 $547,498 $551,066 $140,895 $2,254,229 $4,397,317 MENDOCINO $2,103,207 $1,417,934 $1,282,614 $432,810 $5,246,749 $10,483,313 MERCED $4,024,354 $3,031,023 $2,454,200 $647,178 $10,039,324 $20,196,080 MODOC $1,337,111 $866,204 $815,420 $66,795 $3,335,614 $6,421,144 MONO $981,550 $775,732 $598,586 $33,444 $2,448,617 $4,837,928 MONTEREY $4,472,209 $4,809,608 $2,727,319 $959,330 $11,156,563 $24,125,028 NAPA $1,550,308 $1,721,483 $945,435 $338,393 $3,867,463 $8,423,082 NEVADA $1,631,066 $1,799,602 $994,685 $338,965 $4,068,927 $8,833,245 ORANGE $20,609,686 $33,365,799 $15,064,994 $808,754 $51,413,798 $121,263,030 PLACER $4,597,068 $6,532,580 $3,287,840 $925,800 $11,468,041 $26,811,329 PLUMAS $1,096,234 $1,034,496 $668,524 $163,528 $2,734,712 $5,697,494 RIVERSIDE $18,088,190 $25,430,387 $11,980,530 $1,747,138 $45,123,569 $102,369,814 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2023-24
CSAC Budget Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/12/23 City Council/RSA Agenda 110 Tuesday, June 13, 2023 COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL SACRAMENTO $12,681,678 $16,382,058 $8,253,631 $2,341,093 $31,636,253 $71,294,713 SAN BENITO $1,078,000 $873,904 $657,404 $178,272 $2,689,225 $5,476,806 SAN BERNARDINO $17,138,299 $24,036,996 $11,299,954 $1,596,661 $42,753,931 $96,825,842 SAN DIEGO $23,611,176 $35,121,798 $16,441,985 $2,176,426 $58,901,444 $136,252,828 SAN FRANCISCO* $4,535,613 $5,560,487 $2,765,985 $9,600 $11,314,733 $24,186,418 SAN JOAQUIN $7,244,004 $8,564,607 $4,417,663 $1,010,443 $18,071,200 $39,307,917 SAN LUIS OBISPO $3,910,297 $3,711,797 $2,384,644 $730,997 $9,754,794 $20,492,529 SAN MATEO $5,187,699 $7,929,570 $3,630,574 $306,293 $12,941,453 $29,995,589 SANTA BARBARA $3,944,536 $4,856,277 $2,531,443 $886,237 $9,840,208 $22,058,702 SANTA CLARA $12,101,036 $18,707,582 $8,392,426 $330,422 $30,187,759 $69,719,225 SANTA CRUZ $2,568,141 $3,088,038 $1,669,774 $699,802 $6,406,593 $14,432,348 SHASTA $3,018,180 $2,736,228 $1,840,598 $445,405 $7,529,280 $15,569,691 SIERRA $536,090 $435,947 $326,928 $37,537 $1,337,353 $2,673,855 SISKIYOU $2,177,690 $1,618,633 $1,328,036 $221,770 $5,432,557 $10,778,686 SOLANO $3,771,415 $5,053,324 $2,323,257 $216,926 $9,408,332 $20,773,255 SONOMA $5,463,585 $6,258,526 $3,331,897 $1,013,877 $13,629,691 $29,697,575 STANISLAUS $5,637,846 $6,200,071 $3,438,168 $792,428 $14,064,410 $30,132,922 SUTTER $1,732,832 $1,308,095 $1,056,745 $226,376 $4,322,796 $8,646,844 TEHAMA $1,913,713 $1,028,986 $1,167,053 $285,191 $4,774,030 $9,168,974 TRINITY $1,005,894 $692,901 $613,432 $99,251 $2,509,346 $4,920,823 TULARE $6,785,586 $5,174,417 $4,138,102 $816,907 $16,927,611 $33,842,624 TUOLUMNE $1,329,829 $1,121,215 $810,979 $350,754 $3,317,449 $6,930,227 VENTURA $6,399,743 $9,528,143 $4,499,026 $677,783 $15,965,072 $37,069,768 YOLO $2,373,362 $2,381,109 $1,447,364 $191,895 $5,920,691 $12,314,421 YUBA $1,371,857 $964,173 $836,609 $315,757 $3,422,292 $6,910,688 TOTALS $327,861,000 $418,218,000 $217,110,500 $35,344,882 $817,896,000 $1,816,430,382 * county share only
County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2023-24
CSAC Budget Year Estimates - Based on January Budget revenue estimates - 1/12/23 City Council/RSA Agenda 111 Tuesday, June 13, 2023 RESOLUTION NO._______

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017, to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of project (s) proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $1,731,331 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the fourth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, the City has undergone a public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate major arterial roads throughout the City, maintain sidewalks, streetlights and traffic signals in a safe condition, upgrade traffic signals, streetlights and street signs, and implement active transportation infrastructure throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, the 2020 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in a “good” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into “excellent” condition; and
City Council/RSA Agenda 112 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Resolution XXXX-23

WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of Union City, State of California, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded, in-part, with Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues:

Project Title: Decoto Road Rehabilitation, Phase 1 Project, City Project No. 23-24 Project Description: The project will make repairs to the roadway surface along Decoto Rd., implement Class II buffered bike lanes, make improvements to bike and pedestrian safety, and update ADA access where necessary.

Project Location: Decoto Road from Fremont City Limits to Station Way (BART Station) Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) -Completion (11/24) based on component being funded with RMRA funds.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 10 years
Project Title: Alvarado-Niles Road Multimodal Study, City Project No. 23-25 Project Description: Alvarado-Niles Road is a major transportation corridor within Union City used by automobiles, transit, bicycles and pedestrians enroute to jobs, schools and neighborhoods. It is a major transit route serving UC Transit and AC Transit. This corridor has minimum facilities for bikes and pedestrians with existing Class II bike lanes and 5-foot sidewalk. This project will consider how to enhance all modes of transportation along the corridor.

Project Location: Alvarado-Niles Road between I-880 and Decoto Road Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) -Completion (12/25) based on component being funded with RMRA funds.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years

3. The following previously and adopted project may utilize Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in its delivery. With the relisting of this project in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund this project with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Title: Annual Citywide Pavement Rehab Project, City Project No. 23-01 Project Description: This annual project will restore the City's surface pavement along its roadway network. Based on Pavement Condition Index (PCI) assessments through the City's latest Pavement Management Plan (PMP), staff will direct a specific number of streets and roadways to be repaired using several different methods that will cover light maintenance, heavy maintenance, light rehab, heavy rehab, and reconstruction.

Project Location: Citywide
City Council/RSA Agenda 113 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Resolution XXXX-23

Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) -Completion (12/24) based on component being funded with RMRA funds.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years
Project Title: Union City Boulevard Bike Lanes Project, City Project No. 17-29 (includes pavement rehabilitation)
Project Description: The project proposes to widen Union City Blvd. (UCB) to accommodate a buffer Class II in each direction by reconstructing the median island and rehabilitate/overlay the existing pavement before implementing the new bikeway facilities including Complete Streets improvements. . Other improvements include traffic signals, streetlights, signage/striping and landscaped medians. When completed, the UCB will serve as Union City’s segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail
Project Location: UCB between Smith Street and southern City limits (approximately two miles)
Estimated Project Schedule: Start 07/23 and Completion by 07/25 based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimate Project Useful Life: 10 Years
Project Title: Street Sweeper Replacement Project # 22-23 Project Description: Replacement existing 12-year old sweeper with modern single engine sweeper that reduces the City’s current carbon foot print. The existing sweeper needs to be replaced because of higher maintenance cost and reliability issues, including challenges in finding replacement parts and passing Opacity inspections.

Project Location: Citywide
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/22) -Completion (11/24) based on manufacturer schedule.

Estimated Project Useful Life: 10 years
Project Title: Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04 Project Description: Construct a new four-lane multimodal corridor, parallel to Decoto Road from Old Alameda Creek to Mission Blvd with landscape median, buffer bike lanes and separated Class I bikeway/trail. Creates a new access roadway into Union City BART Station and 100-acre TOD site/Station District area. New intersections at Alvarado-Niles Road, 11th Street and 7th Street, realign Quarry Lakes Drive closer to Old Alameda Creek.

Project Location: Southern city limits
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (07/23) -Completion (12/25) based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 15 years
Project Title: Citywide Streetlight LED Conversion Project, City Project No. 22-16 Project Description: This proposes to convert existing High-Pressure Sodium (HPS) streetlight to energy-efficient LED streetlight with the city limits. There are approximately 4,000 streetlights throughout the city and this project will also evaluate the required illumination level of these existing streetlights.

Project Location: Citywide
City Council/RSA Agenda 114 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Resolution XXXX-23

Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/23) -Completion (12/25) based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years
Project Title: BART Pedestrian At-Grade Crossing, City Project No. 14-14 Project Description: Construct a new pedestrian at-grade (Oakland Sub) crossing to make a new east entrance to Union City BART. Also, improve Decoto Road at-grade crossing and close I Street at-grade (Oakland Sub). Improve other distance at-grade crossings (Coast Sub/Oakland Sub/Niles Sub)
Project Location: east of Union City BART Station
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (10/22) -Completion (12/23) based on component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 20 years
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City, State of California, this 13th day of June 2023, by the following vote:

City Council/RSA Agenda 115 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 6/13/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO, CITYATTORNEY
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION GIVING STANDING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY

MANAGER TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE ALL DONATIONS MADE

TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND COMMUNITY & RECREATION

SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution giving standing authority to the City Manager to accept and appropriate all donations made to the Police Department and Community & Recreation Services Department.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This action aligns with Goal B. Governance and Organization Effectiveness, of the Strategic Plan.

BACKGROUND
Every year, the City of Union City (“City”) receives donations from various individuals and entities. Typically, these donations are given to the Police Department and Community & Recreation Services Department for certain purposes. For example, the Police Department puts on a National Night Out event to promote policecommunity partnerships and neighborhood unity. In support of this event, business and individuals send donations to the City in the form of money and products for raffles.

In order to use the funds, every donation should be accepted and appropriated via a resolution by the City Council. This has been the standard practice of the City and has proven to be inefficient and time consuming.

DISCUSSION
In order to avoid the process of having to perpetually return to Council for acceptance and appropriation of these relatively small donations, staff recommends establishing standing authority for the City Manager to City Council/RSA Agenda 116 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
accept and appropriate these funds in these limited circumstances.

Staff has prepared a resolution that authorizes the City Manager to accept and appropriate donations made to the Police Department and Community & Recreation Services Department in a manner consistent with the purposes of the donation. This willexpedite the City’s ability to process donations and save staff time preparing staff reports and resolutions for these limited categories of donations. With the proposed resolution, the City would be able to accept and appropriate donations made, in a manner consistent with the purposes of the donation, without having to wait for the item to appear on a City Councilagenda.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact of adopting this resolution, though there are anticipated savings in staff time and resources.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Counciladopt a resolution giving standing authority to the City Manager to accept and appropriate all donations made to the Police Department and Community & Recreation Services Department.

Prepared by:

Juliet Vaughn, Associate Attorney
Submitted by:

Kristopher J. Kokotaylo, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Resolution - Donations for Police and CRS Departments Resolution City Council/RSA Agenda 117 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY GIVING

STANDING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT AND

APPROPRIATE ALL DONATIONS MADE TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND

COMMUNITY & RECREATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Union City (the “City”) periodically receives donations via its Police Department and Community & Recreation Services Department; and WHEREAS, for example, the City hosts an annual National Night Out event to promote police-community partnerships and neighborhood unity; and WHEREAS, the City on occasion received donations from businesses and individuals in support of the event, as well as other events, in the form of money and products for raffles; and WHEREAS, in order to use these funds, an appropriation is required by action of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to give standing authority to the City Manager to accept and appropriate all donations made to the Police Department and/or the Community & Recreation Services Department to increase efficiency with donation processing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager to accept and appropriate all donations made to the Union City Police Department and Community & Recreation Services Department in a manner consistent with the purpose of the donation.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that donations to the Police Department shall be deposited into Revenue Account Number 2190-xxxxx-47105 and shall be appropriated to Account Number 2190-xxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx and that donations to the Community & Recreation Services Department shall be deposited into Revenue Account Number 2490-xxxxx-47105 and shall be appropriated to Account Number 2490-xxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx.

City Council/RSA Agenda 118 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Agenda Item
DATE: 6/13/2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CARMELA CAMPBELL, ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION 1) APPROVING THE 2023-2024 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND 2) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO SUBMIT THE 2023-2024 CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN TO THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND

TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

NECESSARY TO SECURE AND AWARD FUNDING FOR THE CITY
AN D ADOPT A RESOLUTION 1) ACCEPTING THE UPDATED PUBLIC SERVICE NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND 2) AWARDING $245,000 ANNUALLY

FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR PUBLIC SERVICE GRANTS FOR FY
23/24 AND FY 24/25, SUBJECT TO FINAL ADOPTION OF THE FY 23/24 AND FY 24/25 CITY BUDGET
Staff recommends that the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) approving the 2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan (“Action Plan”) (Exhibit A) and authorizing the City Manager to submit the Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and execute all documents and certifications necessary to secure and award funding. It is also recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment 2) accepting the updated Public Service Needs Assessment (Exhibit B) and awarding $245,000 annually from the General Fund for Public Service grants for FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 subject to final adoption of the FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 City budget. The Public Service Needs Assessment informed the draft grant allocations of CDBG and General Fund monies identified in Attachment 1 – Exhibit A and Attachment 2 – Exhibit B to social service providers who support Union City residents.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item does not have alignment with a specific goal or strategy but is required to receive Federal Block Grant funds as well as allocate public service grants, which both support the City’s overall mission to create and provide effective, quality services that foster high quality of life and economic vitality.

City Council/RSA Agenda 119 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

BACKGROUND
The City of Union City receives Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) funding on an annual basis from HUD. As part of the requirements to receive this funding, the City must prepare and submit a Consolidated Plan (“Con Plan”) every five years and an Action Plan every year to HUD. The Con Plan and Action Plan assess the City’s housing, community, and economic development needs, identify available resources, and outline a strategy on how the City plans to address those needs. The Action Plan also identifies specific programs/non-profits that will be funded in the upcoming year. FY 2023-2024 will be the fourth year of the City’s current Con Plan.

Typically, the City is required to submit its Action Plan forty-five (45) days prior to the start of the program year (i.e., May 15th submission deadline). However, HUD had not announced the City’s CDBG allocation until May 12th, 2023 because of the delayed 2023 federal budget appropriation. Due to this delay, HUD has allowed for the submission of the FY23 Action Plan 60 days from the date that HUD announces the allocation amounts. This has delayed the deadline for submission of the Action Plan to July 11, 2023 and HUD’s final review deadline for the Action Plan to August 16, 2023.

Due to this delay, the City will be into the program year before executing its funding agreement with HUD. To address this issue, HUD has indicated that the City can move forward with implementing its Action Plan, prior to executing a funding agreement with HUD, to ensure there are no gaps in services for Union City residents.

DISCUSSION
Funding Availability
The City’s CDBG grant allocation for FY 23-24 is $557,187; which is a 0.29% increase (i.e., $1,650) from the previous year. In addition, the City has $320,155 available in unexpended CDBG funds from prior years plus a projected $60 in program income from CDBG-funded loan repayments and loan interest. Of the total unexpended CDBG funding, $160,000 is currently allocated for the Small Business Assistance and Residential Rental grant programs. Staff is currently in the process of dispersing these funds and they are anticipated to be expended by the end of the current fiscal year. This provides a total of $717,402 available in CDBG funding.

Additionally, the City receives an annual allocation of HOME funding from Alameda County as part of its membership in the Alameda County HOME Consortium. HOME funds have four main eligible activities:

Homeowner (owner-occupied) rehabilitation; Rental housing acquisition, new construction, or rehabilitation; Homebuyer housing acquisition, new construction, or rehabilitation, including direct assistance to eligible homebuyers to purchase the housing; Tenant-based rental assistance. The HOME allocation is $148,123, which is a 2.8% decrease (i.e., $4,290) in funding from the previous year.

Pursuant to the CDBG regulations, the City can only allocate 15% of its CDBG grant plus 15% of any program income earned in the prior year towards public service activities. This spending cap limits how many public service organizations the City can support with CDBG funding. As part of the two-year budget cycle, the City has included $245,000 (per fiscal year) from the General Fund for public service grants in the draft budget. The $245,000 from the General Fund is consistent with what the City has allocated in previous year. The General Fund allocation is essential to providing a broad range of public services to Union City residents. The City allocates public service grant funding in two-year cycles through its Public Service grant process, which coincide with the City’s two-year budget cycle. The current two-year allocation cycle is FY 23-24 through FY 24-25.

Below is a summary of the funding identified and programmed in the Action Plan including the allocation of City Council/RSA Agenda 120 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
the General Fund monies since they are part of the City's Public Services grant program, which also utilizes CDBG funds. In addition, the section below provides an overview of the Public Service Needs Assessment, which informed the City's Public Service grants process.

Public Service Needs Assessment
The City completed an updated Public Service Needs Assessment (“Assessment”) (Attachment 2 - Exhibit A) to help with identifying the social service needs of the community and the related public services that should be prioritized for this year’s grant allocation process. The report replaces the previous report that was developed in 2016. As part of the process, the staff and Consultant engaged with City residents to identify the residents' public service needs. The intention was to seek out information from the community and stakeholders, as wellas demographic data about the City, and to identify what public or social services in the community are in the highest demand The report includes background information, methodology, findings, conclusions and recommendations. The Assessment informed the City’s Public Services Grant process, which is described further in the next section, and will inform future Public Service grant opportunities. Staff is recommending the City Councilaccept the Assessment.

The Assessment concludes that the City’s demographics make it distinct as most of the City’s population identifies as part of a minority group. Over 50 percent of the population identify as Asian, 20.3 percent identify as Hispanic or Latino and 4.8% identify as Black or African American. Another important takeaway is that the population of the City is slowly aging; the number of children and youth under the age of 19 has decreased 1.2 percent from 2016 while the number of persons over the age of 65 increased 3.6 percent.

The Assessment included a robust outreach process. As part of the outreach process, the consultant reached out to 35 service providers in the community. Approximately 25 percent of those providers were interviewed and provided information about their budgets, types of clientele, and role in the community. An online survey was generated for community feedback in order to reach as many residents as possible.

Previously in 2016, 450 people provided feedback through a community survey and in 2023 this number increased to 620 people, which was a 27 percent increase in participation. The updated survey was provided in a variety of languages including English, Spanish, Tagalog, Chinese/Mandarin, and Farsi. The survey was available at the Union City Library and on the City’s website and was advertised on social media and through the New Haven Unified School District outreach channels.

The Assessment identified a need for homeless services, senior support services, and youth support services in the community. The types of homeless services identified were for more shelters, case management services, access to social services and unhoused resources. For senior support services, the needs identified included affordable senior housing, support for seniors who wish to stay at home, fall prevention programs, and access to technology for seniors. In terms of youth services, affordable after school programs, youth health education, in-person teen alcohol addiction support, and school-based counseling were all services that were identified as needs from the community.

As part of the City’s Public Services grant process, staff prioritized the identified needs from the Assessment when reviewing applications. If an applicant identified that it served one of the three priority groups, they received two additional points as a bonus metric for prioritizing services to homeless, senior, and youth populations. The City had a 54 percent increase in the number of applications received for the new two year grant cycle and 94 percent of the applications received additional points for providing services to one of the three priority groups. Staff was encouraged by this and looks forward to be able to work with local organizations to not only emphasize services to these groups but to also continue to serve all of Union City residents in need of public services. The social service providers who are being recommended for funding are summarized in the section below.

CDBG, HOME and Public Services Funding Overview
City Council/RSA Agenda 121 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
CDBG funds can be used for an array of activities including public/social services, housing rehabilitation, capital projects, microenterprise programs, and administration. HOME funds can only be used for affordable housing-related activities such as new construction or rehabilitation. See below for an overview of the proposed activities being funded by CDBG and HOME Funds. In addition, this section summarizes the funding recommendations related to the City’s Public Services grant process, which is partially funded by CDBG and General Fund monies. See Attachment 2 - Exhibit A for a chart summarizing the program, activities and public service providers being funded by CDBG and General Fund monies.

Administration (Staf ing) - The City is allowed to use up to 20% of its CDBG allocation plus 20% of FY 23-24 program income to pay for administration expenses, which includes staff costs. The City will allocate $111,449 (maximum allowable amount) in CDBG funds for administration expenses. The City will also allocate $8,476 of its HOME allocation, as allowed by the HOME Consortium, for HOME administration expenses. Both of these funds support Housing Division staffing and supplies, who work on administration of the CDBG and HOME programs.

Public Facilities Improvement Projects – City staff evaluated a range of potential public facility improvement projects to determine CDBG eligibility and to determine which project would be the best fit for this funding. There were several factors were taken into consideration. In order to utilize CDBG funding for a public facility improvement project, it must be located in or adjacent to an area where at least 51 percent of the residents are considered low-income or the facility has income-eligibility requirements that serves individuals who meet the low-income requirements. The only exception to this is if the project addresses accessibility issues. Additionally, the related reporting for a CDBG funded project is more involved than a typical capital project and Public Works staff recommended that all of the funding be utilized for one project to minimize the amount of staff time spent on reporting tasks. Lastly, in order to meet CDBG timely expenditure requirements, it was important to select a project that could be completed within a year of less or be phased over 2 years in order to ensure the City is able to meet its timely expenditure requirements.

The City will utilize $425,953 of the CDBG funding towards the Charles F. Kennedy Park Improvement project (“Park Project”) will be utilized as the initial phase of funding. The Park Project is eligible to utilize CDBG funds since it is adjacent to a Low/Moderate Area Benefit (LMA) eligible area The project will utilize the CDBG funds for design and construction/rehabilitation services throughout the park related to park and parking lot improvements. The project will consist of rehabilitating the grounds with new landscaping and irrigation, repair and modification to pedestrian pathways to rehabilitate damaged asphalt and resolve non-ADA compliant grades, rehabilitate and modify existing picnic area and park surfaces, incorporate ADA compliant benches, replace and expand the amphitheater awning, and make general improvements to the Kennedy Center outdoor Café amenities. The project will also include the rehabilitation of the parking lot including asphalt resurfacing, modifying pedestrian access points, and resolving non-ADA compliant grades.

The park also has approximately 0.5 miles of pathways which are in various states of disrepair. A survey will be performed to ensure that all pathway grades meet ADA standards and sections out of compliance will be rebuilt. The City plans to hire a landscape architect to prepare plans and perform an accessibility review of the park in order to identify any other ADA shortcomings for potential inclusion in the project.

The City considered a variety of projects, but ultimately recommended the Park Project since it was the best fit with all of the various requirements. Staff also wanted to prioritize a project on the east side of the City to ensure geographic equity in how funds are spent since prior CDBG allocations went towards projects on the west side of the City including upgrades to Old Alvarado and Contempo Parks. Along with CDBG funding, the Park Project will also be utilizing funds from the City’s Special Parks Fund. Staff expects to finalize the design by summer 2024. Procurement and minor construction will begin fall of 2024 City Council/RSA Agenda 122 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
through the summer of 2025, with major construction beginning the Summer of 2026 with anticipated completion in the Summer of 2027.

Housing Rehabilitation Program– The Housing Rehabilitation Program provides home repair grants to extremely-low, very-low-, and low-income homeowners to ensure they can remain living safely in their homes. The City plans to continue to contract with the Alameda County Healthy Homes Department to administer this program. The City will allocate $80,000 in CDBG funding for minor home repair and accessibility grants, which is the same amount as last year.

HOME Funded Programs - The City will allocate $139,647 of HOME funding to help with the acquisition of a single-family home property as part of the City’s multi-jurisdictional State Homekey application with the City of Hayward, Livermore, Piedmont, and non-profit partner Bay Area Community Services (BACS). This will be the City’s second attempt at applying for a Homekey application to help serve homeless and at risk of homelessness residents. Should the City fail to receive conditional approval for a Homekey award, staff will work with the City of Fremont to look at opportunities to utilize their Stay Housed-Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program to provide tenant based rental assistance for Union City residents similar to what the City has used the funding for in prior years. As detailed above, the remaining $8,476 of the allocation will be used to cover administrative support of the program.

Public Service Grants - As discussed above, a portion of the City’s CDBG allocation goes towards public services, which are distributed through a process managed by the City. The amount of CDBG funds, which can be allocated towards public services, is limited to 15 percent of the program year allocation and any program income funds, which is estimated to be $83,587. The City also allocates $245,000 of General Fund monies to support public services, which are also distributed through the grant process. See table below for an overview of the public service providers staff recommends be awarded grants funded by both CDBG and General Fund monies. In addition, the list of grant awardees funded by CDBG monies are included in the Action Plan (Attachment 1 – Exhibit A) and awardees funded by General Fund monies are listed in Attachment 2 – Exhibit B.

The City received seventeen (17) applications totaling over $742,853 in requests. More specifically, the City received $195,861 in CDBG requests and $546,992 in General Fund requests. A Subcommittee of the Human Relations Committee (HRC) met on May 1, 2023 and May 2, 2023 to review the application scores and formulate funding recommendations. The Subcommittee took into consideration the applicant’s score; their ability to meet the City’s contracting requirements, especially if a request was made for CDBG funding; and their demonstrated track record serving Union City (if applicable). The subcommittee also focused on applicants who served homeless residents, seniors, and provided youth services consistent with the recommendations included in the Public Service Needs Assessment (Attachment 2 – Exhibit B).

The Subcommittee’s recommendations were then presented to the HRC at their May 4th, 2023 meeting.

The HRC voted 7-0 in favor of the Subcommittee’s recommendations with the ability for staff to make adjustments in order to ensure the City met its CDBG guidelines and requirements and better leverage those funds in an effort to maximize General Fund dollars. The HRC’s recommendation includes funding nine (9) programs that currently receive funding, and five (5) new programs. Included as Attachment 3-5, is more detailed information regarding the HRC’s funding recommendations, a summary of the applications received, and application evaluation and scoring criteria. See below for a summary of the recommended Public Service recipients and grants amounts broken down by funding type.

Table 1. Public Service Grant Recommendations - CDBG
City Council/RSA Agenda 123 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Table 2 - Public Service Grant Recommendations – General Fund As part of the application process, the City prioritized funding for homeless programs in order to address a growing need in the community. Unfortunately, during the NOFA process staff did not receive any applications specific for organizations providing homeless services or shelter. This issue may have been a by-product of continued staff shortages and staff turnover at many of the homeless service providers, who provide emergency homeless shelters and services. Since the close of the application process, Abode Services, who provides homeless support services, has reached out to the City regarding funding for the next fiscal year. Staff will be evaluating this request outside of the Public Service grant process and may utilize community benefits funds provided by the City's cannabis operators.

Historically, the City has been a major funding source for Centro de Servicios Decoto Resource Center operations. The Resource Center is located in a designated LMI census tract and is uniquely situated as a critical service provider in the Decoto neighborhood. The funding recommendation for the organization is consistent with the prior grant amount and will ensure that the organization can continue to provide important services for low income families/individuals experiencing food insecurity, case management services with referrals to emergency shelter, health care access, immigration and citizenship services, emergency cash assistance for low income families/individuals, and interpretation and navigation services.

Microenterprise Assistance Programs – Similar to the last grant cycle, the City has set aside $20,000 in CDBG funds for microenterprise assistance programs (i.e. programs that provide assistance to small businesses) as microenterprise assistance programs are not subject to the public service funding cap. The City received an application from the Community Child Care Council (4Cs) of Alameda County, a microenterprise assistance program that helps low income residents start or maintain in-home child care programs. The 4Cs grant was recommended for a two-year grant in the amount of $20,000 in CDBG funding per year by the Human Relations Committee (HRC).

City Council/RSA Agenda 124 Tuesday, June 13, 2023

FISCAL IMPACT
The activities listed below are funded with CDBG or HOME funding and therefore do not impact the General Fund.

CDBG Administration
Charles F. Kennedy Park
Improvement
Housing Rehabilitation/Housing
Programs
4C’s of Alameda County
City of Fremont - Senior Support
ECHO – Fair Housing
Safe Alternatives to Violent Environments
(SAVE) Crisis Response
Spectrum Community Services-Senior Meals
Union City Family Center
Homekey Scattered Sites Application - Local
Match
The following public services have been identified to receive a total of $245,000 from the General Fund.

This allocation of General Fund dollars has been incorporated into the City’s draft FY 23-24 / FY 24-25 budget (Account 1110-6101-41007-54118).

Centro de Servicios – Decoto
Community Resources for
Independent Living (CRIL)
ECHO Housing
Immigration Institute of the Bay Area
LIFE ElderCare
LegalAssistance for Seniors
Safe Alternatives to Violent
Environments (SAVE) Youth program
Spectrum Community Services – Fall
Prevention
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council hold a public hearing and adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving the 2023-2024 CDBG Action Plan and authorizing the City Manager to submit the Action Plan to HUD and to execute to execute all documents and certifications necessary to secure and award funding for the City and adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 2) accepting the Public Service Needs Assessment and awarding $245,000 annually from the General Fund for Public Service grants for FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 subject to finaladoption of the FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 City budget.

Prepared by:

Francisco Gomez Jr., Housing & Community Development Manager Submitted by:

Francisco Gomez Jr., Housing & Community Development Manager ATTACHMENTS:

Description Type
Resolution -Approving FY23-24 CDBGAction Plan Resolution Exhibit A - 2023 CDBGAnnualAction Plan Exhibit
City Council/RSA Agenda 125 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Resolution -Accepting Updated Public Service Needs Assessment and Approving General Fund Award for FY23-24 and FY24-25 Resolution
Exhibit A - Public Services Needs Assessment 2023 Exhibit Exhibit B- FY23-24 List of Funded Projects and Public Service Providers - CDBGand General Fund
Exhibit
Attachment 3 - HRCSubcommittee Funding Recs FY23-24& FY24- 25 Attachment
Attachment 4 - Summary ofApplications FY23-24 and FY24-25 Attachment Attachment 5 -Application Evaluation & Scoring Criteria FY23-24 and FY24-25
Attachment
Power Point Attachment
City Council/RSA Agenda 126 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-23

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY APPROVING THE 2023-2024 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT THE 2023-2024 CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT AND TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

NECESSARY TO SECURE AND AWARD FUNDING FOR THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Union City receives Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) funding on an annual basis, from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and as part of the requirements to receive this funding, the City must prepare and submit an Annual Action Plan (“Action Plan”) to HUD; and
WHEREAS, the Action Plan assesses the City’s housing, community, and economic development needs, identifies available resources, and outlines a strategy on how the City plans to addressthose needs.

The Action Plan identifies specific programs and non-profits that will be funded in the upcoming year; and
WHEREAS, the CDBG grant allocation for FY 23-24 is expected to be $557,187 and $320,155 available in unexpended CDBG funds from prior years; and WHEREAS, the City receives an annual allocation of HOME funding from Alameda County as part of its membership in the Alameda County HOME Consortium and the HOME allocation for FY 23- 24 is expected to be $148,123; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of the 2023-2024 CDBG Action Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City does hereby approve the 2023-2024 CDBG A n n u a l Action Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City does hereby authorize the City Manager, or his or her designee, to submit the Annual Action Plan to HUD and to execute all documents and certifications necessary to secure and award CDBG and HOME funding for the City.

City Council/RSA Agenda 127 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Contents
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................2 AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ....................................................................................2 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) ..........................................................................................8 AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)………………………………………………………………………………….10 AP-12 Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c).........................................................................................23 Expected Resources....................................................................................................................................30 AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2) ..........................................................................30 Annual Goals and Objectives......................................................................................................................33 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e).............................................................33 AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d) .............................................................................................................36 AP-38 Project Summary ..............................................................................................................................38 AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f) ....................................................................................46 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing -91.420, 91.220(j)............................................................................49 AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k) ....................................................................................................52 Program Specific Requirements..................................................................................................................56 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4) ..........................................................56 Attachment 1: Summary of Citizen Participation Efforts............................................................................58 Attachment 2: 2021-2022 Proposed Budget..............................................................................................59 Attachment 3: SF 424 and Certifications....................................................................................................60 Exhibit A - 2023 Annual Action Plan
City Council/RSA Agenda 128 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Executive Summary
AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b)

1. Introduction
The City of Union City’s Housing and Community Development Division (HCD) under the Economic and Community Development (ECD) Department is the division that prepares the City’s Consolidated Plan and Action Plans. Union City is a member of the Alameda County HOME Consortium (“Consortium”) and the Alameda County Housing and Community Development (HCD) Department is the HOME Consortium’s lead agency. The HOME Consortium consists of Alameda, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Pleasanton, San Leandro, Union City, and the Urban County, which includes the cities of Albany, Dublin, Emeryville, Newark, Piedmont, and the unincorporated areas of the County.

The Consortium has adopted a five-year consolidated planning cycle starting July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2024. This FY 2023-2024 Action Plan serves as the fourth year of the five-year Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan and Action Plan have been prepared for all jurisdictions in the Consortium. Alameda County HCD coordinated the process with the assistance of community development and planning staff from each of the Consortium’s jurisdictions.

The Consolidated Plan and Action Plan are important documents for the City and the HOME Consortium.

Built on interagency coordination, consultation, and public participation, the Consolidated Plan and Action Plan, focus attention on housing and community development needs and the resources available to meet these needs.

2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This could be a restatement of items or a table listed elsewhere in the plan or a reference to another location. It may also contain any essential items from the housing and homeless needs assessment, the housing market analysis or the strategic plan.

The City’s and HOME Consortium’s Five-Year Strategic Plan has established the following priorities and objectives:

Priority – Housing

1. Increase the availability of affordable rental housing for extremely low income households Support the acquisition, rehabilitation and new construction of affordable rental units.

2. Preserve existing affordable rental and ownership housing for households at or below 80% of AMI Provide assistance to low and moderate income homeowners in order to maintain and preserve their City Council/RSA Agenda 129 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
housing stock.

Use all resources available to promote the preservation of existing rental housing stock occupied by low and moderate income households and promote its affordability.

3. Assist low and moderate income first time homebuyers Provide assistance to, and increase affordability of, homeownership of first time low to moderate income homebuyers.

4. Reduce housing discrimination
Reduce housing discrimination through provision of fair housing and landlord/tenant services.

Priority – Homeless Needs

1. By December 2023, work to end homelessness as a chronic and on-going condition for any household in our community
Objectives:
• Use resources to rapidly re-house households.
• Reduce by 50% the amount of time spent living in places not fit for human habitation and/or transitional housing or shelter before returning to permanent housing. • Increase the rate at which people exit homelessness to permanent housing to 65%. • Prevent 10% of people requesting shelter from needing shelter by resolving crisis to enable household to keep permanent housing.
• Utilize resources to acquire single-family homes to provide permanent housing for individuals experiencing homelessness, including people with disabilities, special needs, older adults, young adults/TAY, and single adults.
• Create three Regional Housing Resource Centers.

Priority – Supportive Housing

1. Increase the availability of service-enriched housing for persons with special needs Promote the production of affordable housing, especially permanent housing with supportive services by supporting the acquisition and rehabilitation and new construction of units by developers.

Priority – Community Development

1. Senior facilities and services
Evaluate funding applications for senior services and/or facilities on the basis of low income and moderate income senior needs in the particular jurisdiction and promote provision of these services and/or facilities to the extent feasible.

2. Park and recreations facilities
Support the expansion of existing and/or new development of park and recreation facilities to the extent feasible.

3. Neighborhood facilities
Support the expansion and/or upgrade of existing or new development of neighborhood facilities to the extent feasible.

City Council/RSA Agenda 130 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

4. Childcare facilities and services
Support the expansion of existing or new development of childcare facilities and/or services to the extent feasible.

Priority - Housing

1. Increase the availability of affordable rental housing for extremely low-income households Support the acquisition, rehabilitation and new construction of affordable rental units.

2. Preserve existing affordable rental and ownership housing for households at or below 80% of AMI Provide assistance to low- and moderate-income homeowners in order to maintain and preserve their housing stock.

Use all resources available to promote the preservation of existing rental housing stock occupied by low and moderate income households and promote its affordability.

3. Assist low and moderate-income first-time homebuyers Provide assistance to, and increase affordability of, homeownership of first time low to moderate income homebuyers.

4. Reduce housing discrimination
Reduce housing discrimination through provision of fair housing and landlord/tenant services.

Priority - Homeless Needs

1. By December 2023, work to end homelessness as a chronic and on-going condition for any household in our community
Objectives:
• Use resources to rapidly re-house households.
• Reduce by 50% the amount of time spent living in places not fit for human habitation and/or transitional housing or shelter before returning to permanent housing. • Increase the rate at which people exit homelessness to permanent housing to 65%. • Prevent 10% of people requesting shelter from needing shelter by resolving crisis to enable household to keep permanent housing.
• Utilize resources to acquire single-family homes to provide permanent housing for individuals experiencing homelessness, including people with disabilities, special needs, older adults, young adults/TAY, and single adults.
• Create three Regional Housing Resource Centers.

Priority - Supportive Housing

1. Increase the availability of service-enriched housing for persons with special needs Promote the production of affordable housing, especially permanent housing with supportive services by supporting the acquisition and rehabilitation and new construction of units by developers.

City Council/RSA Agenda 131 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Priority - Community Development

1. Senior facilities and services
Evaluate funding applications for senior services and/or facilities on the basis of low income and moderate income senior needs in the particular jurisdiction and promote provision of these services and/or facilities to the extent feasible.

2. Park and recreations facilities
Support the expansion of existing and/or new development of park and recreation facilities to the extent feasible.

3. Neighborhood facilities
Support the expansion and/or upgrade of existing or new development of neighborhood facilities to the extent feasible.

4. Childcare facilities and services
Support the expansion of existing or new development of childcare facilities and/or services to the extent feasible.

3. Evaluation of past performance
This is an evaluation of past performance that helped lead the grantee to choose its goals or projects.

During the year, Union City used CDBG funds for various activities that helped to benefit low-moderate income people throughout the City. Some of the activities that were funded were for social service programs like Spectrum Community Services, who runs a Senior Nutrition Program, Abode Services, who received funding for providing shelter and services for homeless residents, Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO) that provides residents with fair housing and tenant/landlord counseling programs to help residents stay housed. The City also funded the Community Child Care Council (4Cs) of Alameda County to provide micro-enterprise assistance to in-home childcare providers. CDBG funding was also allocated to the Alameda County Healthy Homes Department to utilize for their Minor Home Repair Grant program that provides repair and rehabilitation grants to low-income homeowners. The use of CDBG funds and funding leveraged from the City's General Fund help to fund services providers for the program year.

The City also completed its capital improvements project at Old Alvarado/Cesar Chavez park. The City conducted ADA improvements to the park that included rehabilitating the picnic area, installing ADA compliant outdoor furniture, resurfacing pathways, and rehabilitating the playgrounds throughout the park and also making them ADA accessible. The project will be closed out in the middle of the program year.

City Council/RSA Agenda 132 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Also due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the City continued to fund various programs to assist residents during the health crisis. Portions of funding received from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) were allocated to the City's CAREavan program, which provides families and/or individuals who have been displaced and are temporarily homeless/living in their vehicles with a safe place to park overnight. The City also funded an additional round of Residential rental Assistance Program which provided emergency rental assistance payments for residents in order to keep them housed and to prevent homelessness. The City also funded an additional round, via unused CARES Act funding, of the Road to Recovery Small Business Assistance Program which helped to support small businesses who were facing financial hardship due to the economic impacts of the COVID19 pandemic to help support them with funding for rent and other associated costs with increasing health and safety precautions at the business location.

Accomplishments for FY 2021-2022 activities are discussed in the FY 2021-2022 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), which can be found at the following link:
https://www.unioncity.org/293/Community-Development-Block-Grant-Progra The CAPER for FY 2022-2023 will be completed in September 2023.

4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Summary from citizen participation section of plan.

In order to better leverage and utilize existing funding, the City conducted an updated Public Services Needs Assessment Study (“Study”) to replace the study from 2016. The goal of the Study is to give the City a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the community’s need and the tools to make calculated and strategic investments in services and programs that will best meet the community’s needs. The components of the Study include a community survey, stakeholder meetings/interviews, demographic review, and recommendations on what needs the City should be focused on for the community. The Study has been used to inform the development of this Action Plan.

The City also took the following actions to solicit further community feedback and input:
• A pre-draft public hearing on the Action Plan was held on January 10, 2023 at the Alameda County HOME Technical Advisory Committee’s (HTAC) meeting. HTAC, then held a public hearing on April 20, 2023, Alameda County Housing & Community Development (HCD) staff presented the staff report regarding the Action Plan. The City has included contingency language in the draft Action Plan as at the time of the public comment period HUD has not announced the City’s HOME allocation.
• The draft Action Plan is made available for a 30-day public comment period from May 9, 2023 through June 8, 2023. A notice was placed in the Tri-City Voice notifying the public of the 30-day public comment period. The City has included contingency language in the draft Action Plan as at the time of the public comment period HUD has not announced the City’s CDBG allocation.

City Council/RSA Agenda 133 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
• The City of Union City will hold a public hearing on June 13, 2023 to take comments on and approve the City’s Action Plan.

5. Summary of public comments
This could be a brief narrative summary or reference an attached document from the Citizen Participation section of the Con Plan.

A summary of public comments is included as part of the Public Services Needs Assessment Study. More information regarding the public input process of the Public Services Needs Assessment Study including the community survey results and the stakeholder meeting minutes can be found at the link below.

Public Services Needs Assessment Study: https://www.unioncity.org/293/Community-DevelopmentBlock-Grant-Progra There have been no public comments received to date on the CDBG Annual Action plan via email, letter, or during the public hearing. This section will be updated after the public hearing has taken place.

6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them All comments and views were accepted.

7. Summary
Please see the discussion above regarding public comments and acceptance of all comments.

City Council/RSA Agenda 134 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b)

1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Agency Role Name Department/Agency
Lead Agency UNION CITY
CDBG Administrator UNION CITY ECD/HCD
HOPWA Administrator ALAMEDA COUNTY HCD
HOME Administrator ALAMEDA COUNTY HCD
HOPWA-C Administrator ALAMEDA COUNTY HCD
Table 1 – Responsible Agencies
Narrative
Alameda County, specifically the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD), is the lead agency responsible for overseeing the development of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans for the Alameda County HOME Consortium (“Consortium”). The City of Union City is responsible for developing its component of the Action Plan and administering the specific programs covered by the City’s Consolidated Plan/Action Plan. EveryOne Home is Alameda County’s Continuum of Care Council, which continues to work on addressing homelessness on a county-wide basis. Much of the work of EveryOne Home is discussed in the homeless section and in the annual Continuum of Care funding application.

Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funds are administered by Alameda County HCD on behalf of the City of Oakland which is the County’s only HOPWA grantee. HOPWA funds are used to support affordable housing development, short term rental assistance, and housing-related services.

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
City Council/RSA Agenda 135 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Francisco Gomez Jr | Housing & Community Development Manager City of Union City | Housing & Community Development Division 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road | Union City, CA 94587
[email protected]/[email protected] | (510) 675-5322 City Council/RSA Agenda 136 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)

1. Introduction
The FY 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan was prepared through consultation with several public and private entities. The HOME Consortium Technical Advisory Committee, composed of staff from all jurisdictions in the HOME Consortium, met bi-monthly to provide policy input into the Consolidated Plan planning process. The Alameda County Healthy Homes Department provided valuable information on the number of households at risk of lead poisoning, and the programs currently operating or planned to mitigate lead-based paint hazards. The three public housing authorities operating in the HOME Consortium (City of Alameda, City of Livermore, and Alameda County) were consulted to obtain current data on Public Housing and Section 8 housing needs, public housing improvements, and other activities.

Further, many of the local non-profit organizations also produce reports concerning the needs of the demographic they serve; this information is also utilized in the plan development.

Additionally, the City conducted a Public Services Needs Assessment Study in 2023. The goals of the Study were to 1) form a foundation from which the City can make effective and beneficial decisions regarding the funding, provisions, and operations of local public service providers and 2) provide a priority needs map that can guide the City in future decisions about where to obligate public services funding and efforts. By strategically allocating resources, the City’s goals are to not just improve services for those in need but help raise the quality of life for the whole community through a commitment to fiscal responsibility and transparency. The components of the Study include a community survey, stakeholder meetings/interviews, demographic review, and recommendations on what needs the City should be focused on for the community. The Study was finalized in May 2023 and has been used to inform the development of this Action Plan.

Public Services Needs Assessment Study: https://www.unioncity.org/293/Community-DevelopmentBlock-Grant-Progra Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(l)).

During this Action Plan period, the City will work on enhancing coordination between public and private service providers. Specific efforts include:
• Participate in the Alameda County HOME Consortium and provide representation on the County’s HOME Consortium Technical Advisory Committee;
• Work closely with local jurisdictions in order to assess the viability of combing efforts to apply for the State of California’s HOMEKEY program in order to address homelessness in the community.

City Council/RSA Agenda 137 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
• Work closely with non-profit social service providers, the County, other entitlement jurisdictions, the New Haven Unified School District, and other community providers to coordinate delivery of services to residents;
• Provide funding and technical assistance to non-profit organizations serving low-income residents;
• Work with EveryOne Home, the County, and service providers to better coordinate homeless services; and
• Work with non-profit organizations and private developers to build and/or maintain affordable housing.

Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.

EveryOne Home is a community based organization serving as Alameda County’s Continuum of Care and coordinates local efforts to address homelessness. EveryOne Home representation includes HOME Consortium jurisdictions and CDBG entitlement jurisdictions in the County, service providers and advocates, homeless or formerly homeless persons, faith-based community representatives, business representatives, and education and health care professionals. EveryOne Home updated its strategic plan to end homelessness in 2018. The updated plan outlines four major strategies:

1. Expand Capacity – increase prevention efforts, street outreach, permanent support housing, and shelter beds;

2. Increase Investment – shift and identify new resources;

3. Build Stronger Partnerships – engage and include those experiencing homelessness in the planning and implementation process; and

4. Align Public Policies – advance polices that help prevent and reduce homelessness.

There are a wide range of efforts being undertaken to meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth.
• Chronically Homeless In 2016, Home Stretch, a community partnership led by EveryOne Home and Alameda County Health Care Services Agency, was launched. Home Stretch prioritizes Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) opportunities to disabled, homeless people with the highest needs in order to maximize the impact PSH can have in ending homelessness. In early 2018, EveryOne Home launched a Coordinated Entry System (CES) for homeless services and shelter along with establishing Housing Resource Centers (HRCs) that are located throughout the County. The HRCs provide housing prioritization and matching, diversion and prevention services, and housing-centered case management which include shelter referrals, transitional housing, and rapid rehousing.

City Council/RSA Agenda 138 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
• Families with Children The new Coordinated Entry System, homeless families can access shelter, rapid re-housing, and diversion/prevention services through a hotline or one of the local HRCs.

Also, in June 2016, the City launched the CAREavan Program which provides families and individuals that are living in their vehicles safe places to park overnight. The CAREavan program is a collaborative effort between the City, school district, and faith- and community-based organizations. All participating sites provide safe parking, a facility attendant, and restrooms.

Some sites provide showers and toiletries, food, clothing, meal service, free Wi-Fi, computer use, and laundry. This program is funded from the City’s General Fund. • Veterans EveryOne Home, Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) grantee agencies and the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) have formed a collaborative whose goal is to end Veteran homelessness. This collaborative is known as Operation Vets Home (OVH). OVH has identified every homeless vet known to Alameda County and updates this information weekly.

OVH has also established a toll-free number that can be used by those wishing to make referrals for homeless vets and outreach workers will be responding to the referrals. • Youth The County funds the Supportive Housing for Transition Age Youth (STAY) program which targets transition age youth (16-24 years old) that are homeless or at-risk of homelessness with a serious mental health issue. The County also funds Transition to Independence Process (TIP), a program for transition age youth (16-24 years old) with serious mental health issues currently living with family that may be unstably housed.

Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction’s area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS The City continues to support the EveryOne Home initiative to establish system wide outcomes and to evaluate effectiveness of programs against those outcomes. These outcomes include shortening the period of time homeless and reducing the recidivism rates for homeless people. Consultation with EveryOne Home on the use of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds, began in early 2012, when representatives from the City of Berkeley, the City of Oakland, Alameda County Housing and Community Development Department (Urban County grantee), and EveryOne Home worked together to implement the new ESG requirements in a way that would be consistent county-wide and would continue a collaboration which began in 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-housing Program (HPRP) funds. This collaboration resulted in the creation of Priority Home Partnership (PHP), which was a single county-wide program to implement HPRP.

EveryOne Home held a community-wide meeting at which additional consultation and public input into the use of ESG funds was solicited. A series of meetings with EveryOne Home and the ESG grantees continues through the year and a coordinated ESG program was established and began implementation in early 2013. This coordinated program will use this same structure for FY15-FY20 ESG funding.

City Council/RSA Agenda 139 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

2. Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and consultations
Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Abode Services, inc.

Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services - Housing
Services-homeless
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Abode Services participated in the community
input process of the Public Services Needs
Assessment Study.
2 Agency/Group/Organization Alameda County Healthy Homes Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services - Housing
Other government - County
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
The Alameda County Healthy Homes
Department provided information on the
number of households at risk of lead poisoning
as part the Consolidated Plan development.
3 Agency/Group/Organization Alameda County Housing and Community Development
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Other government - County
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
City Council/RSA Agenda 140 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
HCD issued a community survey and engaged
a Citizen Advisory Committee as part of the
Consolidated Plan development.
4 Agency/Group/Organization BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC.

Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services-Elderly Persons
Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-homeless
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homelessness Strategy
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
BACS participated in the community input
process of the Public Services Needs
Assessment Study.
5 Agency/Group/Organization Centro de Servicios
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-homeless
Services-Employment
Immigration Services
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Centro de Servicios participated in the
community input process of the Public
Services Needs Assessment Study.
6 Agency/Group/Organization Community Ambassador Program for Seniors (CAPS)
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
CAPS participated in the community input
process of the Public Services Needs
Assessment Study.

City Council/RSA Agenda 141 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
7 Agency/Group/Organization ECHO HOUSING
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Service-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Fair Housing
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
ECHO provides quarterly fair housing updates
and on an annual basis conducts a fair housing
audit.
8 Agency/Group/Organization EDEN I&R
Agency/Group/Organization Type 2-1-1 Operator
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Eden I&R, the organization that operates
Alameda County's 2-1-1 system, participated
in the community input process of the Public
Services Needs Assessment Study.
9 Agency/Group/Organization EveryOne Home
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services-homeless
Regional organization
Planning organization
Continuum of Care
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
City Council/RSA Agenda 142 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
The City attends EveryOne Home meetings
and utilizes the reports, such as the homeless
count, that EveryOne home produces.
10 Agency/Group/Organization Filipino Advocates for Justice Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
FAJ participated in the community input
process of the Public Services Needs
Assessment Study.
11 Agency/Group/Organization Fremont Family Resource Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services-Children
Services-Elderly Persons
Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-homeless
Services-Health
Services-Education
Services-Employment
Other government - Local
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Public Service
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
The Fremont Family Resource Center
participated in the community input process of
the Public Services Needs Assessment Study.
12 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of Alameda County Agency/Group/Organization Type PHA
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
City Council/RSA Agenda 143 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Alameda County was the lead for consulting
with the Housing Authority of Alameda County
to identify need and activities for the five year
Consolidated Plan.
13 Agency/Group/Organization International Institute of the Bay Area Agency/Group/Organization Type Immigration/Citizenship Services What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
International Institute of the Bay Area
participated in the community input process of
the Public Services Needs Assessment Study.
14 Agency/Group/Organization LIFE ELDERCARE
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons Services-Persons with Disabilities
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Life Eldercare participated in the community
input process of the Public Services Needs
Assessment Study.
15 Agency/Group/Organization Safe Alternatives to Violent Environments, Inc.

Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Victims
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
SAVE participated in the community input
process of the Public Services Needs
Assessment Study.
16 Agency/Group/Organization Spectrum Community Services Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons Services-Persons with Disabilities
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Public Services
City Council/RSA Agenda 144 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Spectrum Community Services participated in
the community input process of the Public
Services Needs Assessment Study.
17 Agency/Group/Organization The Village Method
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
The Village Method participated in the
community input process of the Public
Services Needs Assessment Study.
18 Agency/Group/Organization TIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center participated in
the community input process of the Public
Services Needs Assessment Study.
19 Agency/Group/Organization Timelist Group
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Health
Rehabilitation Services
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Timelist Group participated in the community
input process of the Public Services Needs
Assessment Study.
20 Agency/Group/Organization Union City KidZone
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
Services-homeless
Services-Education
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
City Council/RSA Agenda 145 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Union City Kids Zone participated in the
community input process of the Public
Services Needs Assessment Study.
21 Agency/Group/Organization Union City Library
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Education
Other government - County
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Services
Briefly describe how the
Agency/Group/Organization was consulted.

What are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
The Union City Library participated in the
community input process of the Public
Services Needs Assessment Study.

City Council/RSA Agenda 146 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting Efforts were made to include as broad a group of community stakeholders as possible. No agency types were excluded from participation.

City Council/RSA Agenda 147 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care Alameda County - Everyone
Home Drive the development of the homelessness activity goals.

Plan to End Homelessness - 2018 Strategic
Update EveryOne Home
The City has identified the need for homeless services and has set a goal to provide public services which includes shelters and services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness. This goal overlaps with the goals of EveryOne Home as EveryOne Home seeks to prevent homelessness, reduce the amount of time spent homeless, and keep people from returning to
homelessness.

Public Services Needs Assessment Study and
Funding – Update 2023 City of Union City
The City has identified the need for public services and has made it a goal to support critical public service activities. In 2023, the City conducted a Public Services Needs Assessment and Funding Strategy in order to evaluate of the current public services available to the Union City community and to analyze the public service needs in the community. The report evaluates the existing service providers to determine how their services meet the needs of the community, the barriers that prevent residents from finding the services they need, and the gaps in services. The Study provides conclusions about the current and future needs of the community, recommendations on current resident needs in order to help the City most effectively use its available funding.

Alameda County Plan for Older Adults County of Alameda
The City has set an objective to promote the provision of senior services and facilities. The City considered the Alameda County Plan for Older Adults, a comprehensive plan to serve older adults, in the preparation of the Public Services Needs Assessment Study and Funding Strategy (as discussed above).

Table 3 - Other local / regional / federal planning efforts City Council/RSA Agenda 148 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Narrative
Please see the discussion above on the City’s efforts regarding engagement with the public and other stakeholders and the coordination efforts around the Continuum of Care and work with Alameda County’s EveryOne Home program.

City Council/RSA Agenda 149 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-12 Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c)

1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting Citizens are encouraged to be involved in the development of programs offered by HCD including making recommendations regarding:
programs, policies, funding, the five year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), and the Citizen Participation Plan. Community participation was a very important part of the Consolidated and Action Plan development process.

Public Services Needs Assessment Study
As previously mentioned, the City conducted a Public Services Needs Assessment Study and as part of the development of the Study, the City conducted a community survey and held two community stakeholder meetings. • Community Survey - The survey was made available from January 3, 2023 to February 7, 2023 in an online and paper copy format. Paper copies were available at the Union City library, City Hall, Kennedy Community Center, Holly Community Center, and Ruggieri Senior Center. Print copies with QR codes were also provided to local services providers to distribute to their clients, staff and volunteers. The survey was available in English, Chinese, Tagalog, Farsi, and Spanish and advertised through social media, the school district, and the City’s websites. A total of 614 completed surveys were received: 605 English surveys, 1 Tagalog surveys, 2 Chinese/Mandarin surveys, and 6 Spanish surveys. The full survey results can be found in the Public Services Needs Assessment Study. • Stakeholder Meetings - The City held two stakeholder meetings on February 8 and February 9, 2023, to garner feedback on the current and future public services in Union City. A total of 32 stakeholders were asked to participate and 23% of the stakeholders attended the meetings, representing a range of nonprofit and community services agencies in Union City and Alameda County. Activities included a polling exercise, Jamboard exercises and group discussion.

In addition to the community outreach efforts the City undertook as part of the Study, the City also undertook the following efforts. Included as Attachment 1 is a summary of the citizen participation process.

City Council/RSA Agenda 150 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
• A pre-draft public hearing on the Action Plan took place on January 10th, 2023 at the Alameda County HOME Technical Advisory Committee’s (HTAC) meeting. HTAC, then held a public hearing on April 20, 2023, Alameda County Housing & Community Development (HCD) staff presented the staff report regarding the Action Plan. The City has included contingency language in the draft Action Plan as at the time of the public comment period HUD has not announced the City’s HOME allocation. • The draft Action Plan is made available for a 30-day public comment period from May 9, 2023 through June 8, 2023. A notice was placed in the Tri-City Voice notifying the public of the 30-day public comment period. The City has included contingency language in the draft Action Plan as at the time of the public comment period HUD has not announced the City’s CDBG allocation. • The City of Union City will hold a public hearing on June 13, 2023 to take comments on and approve the City’s Action Plan.

City Council/RSA Agenda 151 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Citizen Participation Outreach
Sort Ord
er
Mode of Outre
ach
Target of Outr
each
Summary of
response/attend
ance
Summary of
comments rece
ived
Summary of com
ments not
accepted
and reasons
URL (If applicable)
City Council/RSA Agenda 152 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Sort Ord
er
Mode of Outre
ach
Target of Outr
each
Summary of
response/attend
ance
Summary of
comments rece
ived
Summary of com
ments not
accepted
and reasons
URL (If applicable)
1 Community
Survey
Minorities
Non-English
speaking –
Specify other
language:

Spanish,
Tagalog,
Chinese/Mand
arin, Farsi
Nontargeted/broad
community
As part of the
development of
the Public
Services Needs
Assessment
Study, an online
survey was
conducted
January 3rd, 2023
to February 2nd,
2023 to assess
the public service
needs of the
community.

Surveys were
available in
English,
Chinese/Mandari
n, Tagalog, Farsi,
and Spanish. A
total of 614
completed
surveys were
received: 605
English surveys, 1
Tagalog surveys,
2 Chinese/Mandari
n surveys, and 6
Spanish surveys.

The survey
results can be
found in the
Community
Outreach
section of the
Public Services
Needs
Assessment
Study
All comments
were accepted.
https://www.unioncity.org/293/Co
mmunity-Development-BlockGrant-Progra
City Council/RSA Agenda 153 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Sort Ord
er
Mode of Outre
ach
Target of Outr
each
Summary of
response/attend
ance
Summary of
comments rece
ived
Summary of com
ments not
accepted
and reasons
URL (If applicable)
2 Community
Stakeholder
Meeting
Non-profit
service
providers and
community
service
agencies
Part of the
development of
the Public
Services Needs
Assessment
Study, the City
held two
stakeholder
meetings on
February 8 and
February 9, 2023,
to garner
feedback on the
current and
future public
services in Union
City. A total of 32
stakeholders
were asked to
participate, 23%
of stakeholders
attended the
meetings,
representing a
range of
nonprofit and
community
services agencies
in Union City and
Alameda County.

Activities
included a polling
exercise,
Jamboard
session, and
group discussion
Complete notes
from the
meetings can
be found in the
Community
Outreach
section of the
Public Services
Needs
Assessment
Study
All comments
were accepted.
https://www.unioncity.org/293/Co
mmunity-Development-BlockGrant-Progra
City Council/RSA Agenda 154 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
28 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Sort Ord
er
Mode of Outre
ach
Target of Outr
each
Summary of
response/attend
ance
Summary of
comments rece
ived
Summary of com
ments not
accepted
and reasons
URL (If applicable)
3 Public Hearing Non-targeted /
broad
community
A pre-draft public
hearing on the
Action Plan was
held on January
10th, 2023 at the
HOME Technical
Advisory
Committee
(HOME-TAC)
meeting. The
purpose of the
meeting is to
present an
overview of the
Action Plan and
review and solicit
input on the
housing and
community
development
needs of the
HOME
Consortium
No Comments
were received.

No comments
were received.
4 Newspaper Ad Non-targeted /
broad
community
Newspaper
notice to
advertise 30-day
public comment
period from May
9, 2023 to June 8,
2023.

TBD TBD
City Council/RSA Agenda 155 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
29 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Sort Ord
er
Mode of Outre
ach
Target of Outr
each
Summary of
response/attend
ance
Summary of
comments rece
ived
Summary of com
ments not
accepted
and reasons
URL (If applicable)
5 Public Hearing Non-targeted /
Broad
Community
A public hearing
on April 20, 2023
via conference
call by the
County's
Community and
Housing
Development
office to take
comments on the
draft HOME
Consortium
Action Plan.

Public Notices
will be placed in
all Bay Area
Newspaper
Group (BANG)
newspapers in
Alameda County.

No comments
were received.

No comments
were received.
6 Public Hearing Non-targeted /
broad
community
The City Council
of the City of
Union City will
hold a public
hearing on June
13, 2023 to take
comments and
adopt the City's
Action Plan.

TBD TBD
Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach
City Council/RSA Agenda 156 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
30 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Expected Resources
AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
The City will use CDBG, HOME, and the City’s General Fund dollars to accomplish the specific objectives in this Action Plan. Included as Attachment 2 is a more detailed budget for 2023-2024. HUD has not announced the City’s 2023-2024 grant allocations therefore the funding levels shown are only estimates based on last year’s allocation. Included as Attachment 4 is the City’s contingency plan should the proposed funding levels be different than the actual allocation amounts.

Anticipated Resources
Program Source
of
Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income: $
Prior Year
Resources: $
Total:
$
CDBG PublicfederalAcquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services
557,187 60 $320,155 877,402 1,270,525 The City of Union City is an entitlement
jurisdiction and
therefore receives an
annual CDBG grant
allocation from HUD.

City Council/RSA Agenda 157 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
31 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
General Fund PubliclocalPublic Services 245,000 0 0 245,000 0 The City plans to use $245,000 of its General
Fund to support
nonprofit public service
providers. This is to
supplement the CDBG
funding the City uses for
public services.

Other PublicfederalHousing 148,123 0 0 148,123 0 The City plans to use its HOME funds allocation
to support a tenantbased rental assistance
program and to increase
the availability of
supportive housing.

Table 5 - Expected Resources – Priority Table
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied
Leveraging CDBG funds continues to be a challenge due to reduced entitlement allocations and the dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies (RDA) statewide. Therefore, to maximize leveraging of its own funds and increase the funds available for housing and community development activities, the City plans to undertake the following activities:
• Support applications by organizations or agencies for other public and private sources of financing to leverage City funds. • Include leveraging and diversified funding as a goal, to the maximum extent possible, in the City’s funding review processes. • Continue to provide support to nonprofit, community-based housing developers and service providers in obtaining other sources of financing.
• Promote joint development with other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies to implement housing community development programs and combine multiple sources of financing.

City Council/RSA Agenda 158 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
32 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
The City allows several public service providers to operate programs out of City owned facilities. More specifically, the City owns the Decoto location and Alvarado Resource Center where Centro de Servicios operates their programs. Legal Assistance for Seniors and Spectrum Community Services both operate programs out of the City’s Ruggieri Senior Center and the City’s Police Department provides office space for SAVE’s COPS advocate, who provides services and resources to residents seeking domestic violence services.

In November 2016, Alameda County voters passed Measure A1, which provides $580 million for affordable rental and ownership housing. In early 2018, the City selected a non-profit developer to help develop a city-owned site into affordable housing. The developer has conducted extensive community outreach for the proposed project and received approval in July 2020. The City plans to utilize its allocation of Measure A1 funding to support this project. The developer is continuing to look for additional financing to fill the financial gap caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The project is anticipated to be complete in 2024/2025.

Discussion
Please see discussion above.

City Council/RSA Agenda 159 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
33 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Annual Goals and Objectives
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information
Sort Order Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
1 Promote
Production,
Rehabilitation,
and Preservation
2020 2025 Affordable
Housing
City-wide Housing
Needs
CDBG: $80,000 Homeowner Housing
Rehabilitated: 10 Household
Housing Unit
2 Reduce Housing
Discrimination
2020 2025 Affordable
Housing
City-wide Housing
Needs
CDBG: $10,000 Public Service activities other than
Low/Moderate Income Housing
Benefit: 125
3 Increase
Availability of
Supportive
Housing
2020 2025 Affordable
Housing
City-wide Supportive
Housing
Needs
CDBG: $0
HOME Consortium:
$139,647
Other: 6 other
4 Improve Public
Facilities
2020 2025 Non-Housing
Community
Development
City-wide Community
Development
Needs
CDBG: $425,953 Public Facility or Infrastructure
Activities other than
Low/Moderate Income Housing
Benefit: 1680 persons assisted
5 Support Public
Service Programs
2020 2025 Non-Housing
Community
Development
City-wide Community
Development
Needs
CDBG: $80,000 Public service activities other
than Low/Moderate Income
Housing Benefit: 815 Persons
Assisted
6 Fund Economic
Development
2020 2025 Non-Housing
Community
Development
City-wide Community
Development
Needs
CDBG: $20,000 Businesses assisted: 8
Businesses Assisted
Table 6 – Goals Summary
Goal Descriptions
City Council/RSA Agenda 160 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
34 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
1 Goal Name Promote Production, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Goal
Description
• Promote the production of affordable rental housing by supporting the acquisition, rehabilitation, and new construction of units.
• Provide assistance to low- and moderate-income homeowners in order to maintain and preserve housing stock at that affordability level.
• Use all resources available to promote the preservation of existing rental housing stock occupied by low- and moderate-income households and promote its affordability. • Provide assistance for, and increase affordability of, homeownership for first time low/moderate-income homebuyers.
2 Goal Name Reduce Housing Discrimination
Goal
Description
• Reduce housing discrimination through provision of fair housing and landlord/tenant services. 3 Goal Name Reduce Homelessness
Goal
Description
• Use resources to rapidly re-house households.
• Reduce the number of people being homeless.
• Increase the rate at which people exit homelessness to permanent housing. 4 Goal Name Increase Availability of Supportive Housing Goal
Description
• Promote the production of affordable housing, especially permanent housing with supportive services by supporting the acquisition and rehabilitation and new construction of units by developers. • Provide Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) subsidies with supportive services.

City Council/RSA Agenda 161 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
35 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
5 Goal Name Improve Public Facilities
Goal
Description
• Support the expansion of existing and/or new development of park and recreation facilities to the extent feasible. • Support the expansion and/or upgrade of existing or new development of neighborhood facilities to the extent feasible.
• Support the expansion of existing or new development of childcare facilities and/or services to the extent feasible. • Support the provision of accessibility improvements to the extent feasible. • Support provision of infrastructure improvements to the extent feasible. • Support expansion or improvement of public facilities to the extent feasible. 6 Goal Name Support Public Service Programs
Goal
Description
• Support critical public service activities to the extent feasible. 7 Goal Name Fund Economic Development
Goal
Description
• Support expansion and creation of economic development opportunities to the extent feasible.

City Council/RSA Agenda 162 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
36 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d)
Introduction
This section describes the individual activities to be funded with FY 2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding and includes a description of other local funding sources being used to further the jurisdiction’s housing and community development goals. CDBG funds can be used for four (4) general types of projects: housing, capital projects, economic development, and public services. All projects must meet at least one of HUD’s national objectives: 1) to benefit low/moderate-income people; 2) to prevent or eliminate slums and blight; and 3) to meet an urgent community development need. Even if a project is suitable for one of the City’s eligible categories, it must also pass the low- and moderate-income benefit test. In general, a project meets this standard if at least 51% of the beneficiaries have low to moderate incomes (i.e., incomes at or below 80% of Area Median Income) or if the project benefits an area (e.g., census tracts, service area, neighborhood, etc.) with a majority of lowmoderate income people. Funded projects are required to document the income levels of persons and households receiving these services.

After assessing the City's housing and community development priority needs, evaluating the Five-Year Strategic Plan objectives for FY 2020-2024, and analyzing CDBG eligibility criteria, the City is proposing to allocate its available CDBG and HOME funding to the following eligible funding categories: Minor Home Repair, Public Services, Fair Housing, General Administration, and public facility improvements. # Project Name
1 Minor Home Repair Grant Program
2 Spectrum Community Services
3 Union City Family Center
4 Safe Alternatives to Violent Environments (SAVE)
5 Community Child Care Council (4Cs) of Alameda County
6 Fair Housing – ECHO Housing
7 CDBG Program Administration
8 Kennedy Park Improvements
9 City of Fremont
Table 7 – Project Information
City Council/RSA Agenda 163 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
37 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
In 2016-2017, the City created a public service grant application process that prioritized programs that can address some of the Public Services Needs Assessment Study’s findings such as locating services within Union City, equal opportunity outreach and marketing, creating more partnerships/collaborations to reduce duplication of services, prioritizing programs that can leverage other funding, and improving the collection and reporting of metrics and achievements. The City has continued to utilize this grant application process for its FY23-24/FY24-25 two year grant cycle. From this process, the City awarded two year grants to 14 public service program using CDBG and General Fund dollars.

Although the City conducted an updated Public Service Needs Assessment Study to help guide the City in its allocation priorities and to ensure the City is using its funding effectively, a major obstacle continues to be the lack of overall funding. HUD's spending cap of 15% of the annual allocation for public services is an obstacle for providing supportive services to extremely-low-, very-low- and moderate-income residents. The need for public services far exceeds the funds available to support those services. Also due to the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, the City received an increase in overall applications but no applications were received to specifically address homeless/homeless supportive services targeting services to extremely-low, very-low, and moderate income residents. Due to continued staff shortages at many of the homeless service providers, who the City has partnered with in the past and after specific outreach attempts to providers, some applicants opted to not apply during this grant cycle. The City is looking to utilize some non-competitive funds from its Cannabis Community Benefits Fund to work with emergency homeless shelter service providers in order to continue to provide services for residents facing homelessness. Many other service providers, if they did apply, opted for General Fund requests to decrease the administrative burden because they felt that they would not be able to meet some of the mandatory reporting required by CDBG funds. For example, the City received over $195,861 in requests for CDBG public service funding however the City only has approximately $83,000 available each year in CDBG funds for public services. Additionally, the City received over $546,992 in General Fund requests but only has $245,000 in General Fund dollars to allocate for additional public services.

City Council/RSA Agenda 164 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
38 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-38 Project Summary
Project Summary Information
1 Project Name Minor Home Repair Grant Program
Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Promote Production, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Needs Addressed Housing Needs
Funding CDBG: $80,000
Description The Minor Home Repair Grant Program provides home repair grants for owner-occupied, extremely-low, very-low, and low income households.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The City anticipates that 25 households will be served in FY 2023-2024 using CDBG funding.

Location Description Citywide
The Minor Home Repair Grant Program is available citywide.

Planned Activities Provide minor home repair and accessibility improvement grants to low income homeowners. 2 Project Name Spectrum Community Services
Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Support Public Service Programs
Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $15,000
City Council/RSA Agenda 165 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
39 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Description Provide meals and health/mental health services to low and extremely low-income seniors Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The City anticipates that 115 Union City residents will be served in FY 2023-2024 using CDBG funding.

Location Description Citywide
Spectrum Community Services Senior Health Initiative
2621 Barrington Court , Hayward, CA
Planned Activities Provide meals, injury prevention exercise/education programs, wellness coaching sessions for seniors. 3 Project Name Union City Family Center
Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Support Public Service Programs
Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $35,000
Description Union City Family Center provides emergency food, clothing, health insurance enrollment, on-site social services, referrals, information, referrals for families to the City’s CAREavan program to provide safe overnight parking for families and individuals experiencing homelessness and living in their vehicle . The program also has family liaisons at every school site in the New Haven Unified School District.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The City anticipates that UC Family Center will serve 600 Union City residents in FY 23-24.

City Council/RSA Agenda 166 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
40 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Location Description Citywide
The Union City Family Center is located at 725 Whipple Road, Union City CA. However, the program also has family liaisons located at schools throughout the New Haven Unified School District.

Planned Activities The Union City Family Center (UCFC)provides a service hub for struggling families. UCFC operates a thriving Family Resource Center located in the Decoto community that functions as a hub of services. Families can get emergency food, clothing, and household supplies; as well as sign up for many public benefits, get financial coaching, enroll children in pre-school, sign-up for the CAREavan program for families experiencing homelessness and living out of their vehicle, meet with case managers or Counselors, and get referrals and linkages to other needed services.
4 Project Name Safe Alternatives to Violent Environments (SAVE) – Crisis Response Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Support Public Service Programs
Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description Provide services for low income survivors of intimate partner violence and their children facing domestic violence and in need of crisis intervention services.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The City anticipates that SAVE will serve 75 Union City residents in FY 23-24.

Location Description Citywide
SAVE’s main office is located at 1900 Mowry Ave. #201., Fremont, CA 94538. However, most services provided by SAVE can be conducted via their 24/7 crisis line that also offers 24/7 translation services for residents throughout Union City.

City Council/RSA Agenda 167 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
41 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Planned Activities The program will provide services for survivors of domestic violence. SAVE advocates will provide crisis intervention services, domestic violence educations, referrals to the SAVE Housing program for victims of domestic violence, peer counseling, ana legal assistance services. 5 Project Name Community Child Care Council (4Cs) of Alameda County Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Fund Economic Development
Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $20,000
Description Microenterprise assistance program that provides business support, education, technical assistance, and incentives to help Union City residents launch and operate in-home, family child care businesses.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The City anticipates that 4Cs will serve 8 Union City businesses in FY 23-24.

Location Description Citywide
Community Child Care Council (4Cs) of Alameda County
22351 City Center Dr, Suite 100, Hayward, CA 94541
39155 Liberty Street, Room D410, Fremont, CA 94538
Planned Activities Microenterprise assistance program that provides business support, education, technical assistance, and incentives to help Union City residents launch and operate in-home, family child care businesses. 1) Recruiting and assisting 4 Union City residents in applying for child care licenses and starting up family child care businesses and 2) Provide training, resources, and consultation to 8 new and existing family child care providers in Union City.
6 Project Name Fair Housing - ECHO Housing
City Council/RSA Agenda 168 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
42 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Reduce Housing Discrimination
Needs Addressed Housing Needs
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description The City has contracted with Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (ECHO) to provide fair housing services for tenants and landlords including mediation and counseling services, fair housing testing, and education/outreach.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The City anticipates that ECHO will serve 125 Union City residents in FY 23-24.

Location Description Citywide
Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (ECHO) Housing
770 A St #310
Hayward, CA 94541
Planned Activities Fair housing services for tenants and landlords including mediation and counseling services, homeless prevention services, fair housing testing, education/outreach, and a Fair housing audit. 7 Project Name CDBG Program Administration
Target Area City-wide
City Council/RSA Agenda 169 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
43 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Goals Supported Promote Production, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Reduce Housing Discrimination
Reduce Homelessness
Increase Availability of Supportive Housing
Improve Public Facilities
Support Public Service Programs
Fund Economic Development
Needs Addressed Housing Needs
Homeless Needs
Supportive Housing Needs
Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $111,449
Description General CDBG Program Administration
Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
Not Applicable
Location Description Citywide
Planned Activities The City will use 20% of its entitlement and 20% of the current year program income to administer the CDBG program.
8 Project Name Charles F. Kennedy Park Improvements
Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Improve Public Facilities
Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
City Council/RSA Agenda 170 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
44 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Funding CDBG: $425,953
Description The City will conduct park improvements to Charles F. Kennedy Park. The park is located adjacent to the Decoto neighborhood a LMA qualified area.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
1,680 persons
Location Description CDBG LMA eligible area adjacent to the park located at:

Charles F. Kennedy Park
1333 Decoto Rd., Union City, CA 94587
Planned Activities The City plans to use CDBG funds to undertake design and construction/rehabilitation services within the park for park improvements and parking lot improvements. The City has identified the Charles F. Kennedy Park for Park improvements. The project will consist of rehabilitating the grounds with new landscaping and irrigation, placement of grass in dirt areas and shrubs and trees in planting pockets, repair and modification to pedestrian pathways to rehabilitate damaged asphalt and resolve non-ADA compliant grades, rehabilitate and modify the existing picnic area and furniture which will be replaced with new barbeques, trash cans, ADA compliant benches, picnic tables and drinking fountains. The work will involve removing existing trees and replanting new trees. The project will also include the rehabilitation of the parking lot with asphalt resurfacing, modifying pedestrian access points and resolving non-ADA compliant grades.

The parks also have approximately 0.5 miles of pathways which are in various states of disrepair. A survey will be performed to ensure that all pathway grades meet ADA standards and sections out of compliance will be rebuilt. The City plans to hire a landscape architect to prepare plans and perform an accessibility review of the park in order to identify any other ADA shortcomings for potential inclusion in the project. 9 Project Name City of Fremont – Senior Support
City Council/RSA Agenda 171 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
45 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Support Public Service Programs
Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description Provide comprehensive senior adult services for Union City seniors and their families in the form of comprehensive in-person and video conference assessment, Care planning for direct senior client needs, service coordination to identify home care coordination, financial planning, legal assistance, transportation assistance, entitlement program access, nutrition program, personal care, and protective services.

Target Date 6/30/2024
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The City anticipates that 25 Union City residents will be served in FY 2023-2024 using CDBG funding.

Location Description Citywide
3300 Capitol Avenue
PO Box 5006
Fremont, CA 94537
Planned Activities Provide comprehensive assessment, care planning, service coordination, and care monitoring services for seniors.

City Council/RSA Agenda 172 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
46 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f)
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The City of Union City has a richly diverse racial and ethnic population, with no one group making up a majority of the City’s population therefore all the activities identified above are available citywide.

However, the City has identified in its Consolidated Plan, two geographic priority areas: Old Alvarado (now known as the Alvarado Historic District) and Decoto. These neighborhoods are lower income and have a history of blight. So although services are provided citywide, there is an emphasis to provide support in these neighborhoods. For example, the City is supporting the Union City Family Center and Centro de Servicios (with General Fund dollars) which both have locations in the Decoto neighborhood.

Additionally, the City provides General Fund dollars to the Filipino Advocates for Justice which operates youth programs serving the Old Alvarado neighborhood.

Furthermore, there is an identified need for housing rehabilitation in Decoto and Old Alvarado neighborhoods due to the high number of older homes in these areas. While the program is available citywide, the City continues to refer Decoto and Old Alvarado residents to the Minor Home Repair Grant Program. Additionally, there is a concentration of housing rehabilitation need and activity in the Tropics, a mobile home park specifically for seniors. All of the residents of the Tropics are seniors and many of them are extremely low-income. Many of the home repair projects at the Tropics include accessibility modifications and health/safety improvements to ensure the residents can continue to live independently.

Finally, several of the senior-based programs the City supports are based out of the City’s senior center.

The concentration of these programs is to ensure that the programs reach their target clientele.

Geographic Distribution
Target Area Percentage of Funds
City-wide 100
Table 8 - Geographic Distribution
City Council/RSA Agenda 173 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
47 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Given the City’s diversity and mixed economic base, all the activities listed above are intended and open to all eligible households within Union City. However, the City does fund programs that are located within the Decoto, Old Alvarado, and Tropics neighborhoods as these areas have higher concentrations of lower income households and in the case of the Tropics, the mobile home park is comprised entirely of seniors.

Discussion
Please see discussion above.

City Council/RSA Agenda 174 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
48 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
City Council/RSA Agenda 175 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
49 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing -91.420, 91.220(j) Introduction
The City continues to face the following barriers to affordable housing: funding, land costs, construction costs and credit/financial assistance availability.

Funding
The elimination of redevelopment agencies in California created a major funding shortfall for affordable housing production, as over $1 billion statewide was lost annually for affordable housing. However, both the City and County are taking efforts to create/develop new affordable housing funding sources. In November 2016, Alameda County voters passed Measure A1 which provides $580 million for affordable rental and ownership housing. Additionally, as mentioned, the City has selected a non-profit developer to develop a city-owned site into affordable housing. The City plans to utilize its allocation of Measure A1 funding for this project. The developer also continues to look for additional financing to cover the gap in funding caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The project is anticipated to be complete in 2024/2025.

Land Costs
As the economy continues its recovery, new construction and acquisition/rehabilitation of housing is severely impacted by the rising cost of land in the Bay Area. The viability and feasibility of future City-assisted affordable housing developments may depend on the reasonableness of the land acquisition costs. The City will conduct financial feasibility analyses on a project-by project basis to ensure it is not over-subsidizing affordable housing projects for any land purchase.

Construction Costs
In addition to rising land costs, there has been a significant rise in the cost of construction which negatively affects the development of affordable housing and rehabilitation. In addition to undertaking financial feasibility analyses on a project-by-project basis to ensure that the City is not over-subsidizing development costs for affordable housing developers, the City will continue to work with them as well through design, planning, and financing review and recommendations to reduce increased construction costs.

Credit & Financial Assistance Availability
City Council/RSA Agenda 176 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
50 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Increases in home prices and limited access to credit and financial assistance, has made it difficult for first time home buyers to find affordable housing in the Bay Area. Previously, the City had a down payment assistance program however with the loss of RDA, the program’s funding source, and the dissolution of Neighborhood Housing Services Silicon Valley, the program’s administrator, the program is no longer available.

Currently, the first time homebuyer programs available to Union City residents are California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) programs, Alameda County’s Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, and AC Boost, a new down payment assistance program that’s funded by Measure A1.

Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The City will continue to monitor and identify areas of improvement in its public policies in order to foster and maintain the supply of affordable housing and remove barriers to affordable housing development. The City will also continue to maintain and encourage affordable housing development by:
• Ensuring that sufficient land is available and zoned at a range of residential densities to accommodate the City’s regional share of housing.
• Encouraging home builders to use multifamily designated land for the highest allowed density to make the use of land and facilities more efficient and to provide more affordable housing opportunities. • Encouraging the consolidation of parcels designated for multifamily residential development when it facilitates efficient development of the parcels.
• Ensuring City policies, regulations, and procedures do not add unnecessarily to the costs of producing housing while assuring the attainment of other City objectives.
• Continuing to support development within in the City’s Priority Development Area (PDA), which prioritizes higher intensity development adjacent to transit as well as continue to offer incentives to encourage affordable and high-density housing adjacent to transit. • Continuing to allow mixed use zoning to encourage housing development. • Giving priority to multifamily housing project applications that provide affordable housing on-site to ensure that they are expedited. • Deferring certain fees on affordable housing developments until issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (COO), to help offset development costs for affordable housing.

City Council/RSA Agenda 177 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
51 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
• Continuing to implement the City's Affordable Housing Ordinance which requires developers to set aside 15% of housing units for lowand moderate-income households. Thus far, the ordinance has led to the development of 312 affordable units. The City recently amended this ordinance to maximize its effectiveness to produce affordable housing units. • In 2018, the City established an affordable housing impact fee on expansions/additions that exceeding 500 square feet. • Continuing to cooperate with other governmental agencies in seeking solutions to area wide housing problems. • The City recently further streamlined its Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance to align with State law and promote the development of ADUs. The City also continues to provide ADU information handouts at City Hall and online. • Seeking new funding sources for affordable housing development.

Discussion
Please see discussion above.

City Council/RSA Agenda 178 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
52 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k)
Introduction
The following sections describe the actions and efforts the City will make to address things such as meeting underserved needs, affordable housing, and lead based paint hazards. Many of these actions are based upon the importance of coordinating with other jurisdictions, local service providers, and the private sector. In a time with limited funding available, the City's focus will be on creativity and collaboration in order to meet more needs of the community.

Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The main obstacle the City faces in meeting underserved needs is a lack of funding. With the loss of RDA funds, reduced CDBG entitlement allocations, and a General Fund budget deficit, the City has limited capabilities in meeting the needs of the community. In order to help address this issue and to develop a funding strategy to ensure the City is utilizing its limited funding in the most effective way, the City conducted the Public Services Needs Assessment Study. As mentioned, the Study 1) assessed the City’s current and projected demographics; 2) identified the public/social service needs of the community which included a community input process; and 3) developed a funding strategy. The public service needs and funding strategy that came out of the Study were used in the FY 23-24/FY 24-25 public service allocation process. The evaluation criteria prioritized programs that can address some of the Study’s findings such as homeless services, senior services, and youth services while maintaining previously defined prioritization like equal opportunity outreach and marketing, creating more partnerships/collaborations to reduce duplication of services, and improving the collection and reporting of metrics and achievements.

Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The barriers to affordable housing in Union City continue to be high housing costs and the lack of sufficient funding for affordable housing and supportive services. Addressing these issues is a high priority for the City. Listed below are actions the City plans to take to foster and maintain affordable housing:
• In November 2016, Alameda County voters passed Measure A1, which provides $580 million for affordable rental and ownership housing. In early 2018, the City selected a non-profit developer to help develop a city-owned site into affordable housing. The developer has conducted extensive community outreach for the proposed project and received approval in July 2020. The City plans to utilize its allocation of Measure A1 funding to support this project. • Preserve and maintain existing affordable housing by using federal and local funds (as available) to rehabilitate existing housing units through the City’s Minor Home Repair Program. In addition, a portion of Measure A1 funds were allocated to a Renew Alameda County, a new housing rehabilitation loan program to help low income homeowner remain safely in their City Council/RSA Agenda 179 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
53 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
homes. The City will support and promote this program.
• A portion of Measure A1 funds were allocated to AC Boost, a new down payment assistance program to help lower income first time home buyers purchase a home in Alameda County. The City will support and promote this program.
• Seeking new funding sources for affordable housing development. • The City amended its Affordable Housing Ordinance to maximize its effectiveness to produce affordable housing units. The ordinance requires developers to set aside 15% of housing units (ownership and rental) for low- and moderate-income households or pay an in-lieu fee. • In 2018, the City established an affordable housing impact fee on expansions/additions that exceeding 500 square feet.
• Continue to develop programs and policies which link identified needs with available resources • Continue to monitor the City’s existing below market rate (BMR) housing portfolio to ensure the units remain affordable.
• Include leveraging as a goal to the maximum extent possible in City funding application review processes.
• Support the acquisition/rehabilitation and new construction of units by nonprofit housing developers.
• Continue to provide support to nonprofit, community-based housing developers and service providers in obtaining other sources of financing. This would include supporting applications by organizations or agencies for other public and private sources of financing to leverage City funds • Promote joint development with other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies to implement housing community development programs and combine multiple sources of financing.

The City plans to use is 23-24 HOME funds to allocate funds to partner with Bay Area Community Services as part of a State HOMEkey application to acquire and rehabilitate at least one property in Union City that will provide supportive shared rental housing for people experiencing homelessness.

Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The City does not have a lead-based paint (LBP) reduction program but does coordinate with Alameda County Community Development Agency’s Healthy Homes Department (ACHHD). ACHHD will continue to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards by conducting outreach and training, providing technical assistance, and completing lead-safe repairs that will also include healthy housing repairs and other rehabilitation services to residents and property owners of Alameda County.

ACHHD will assist low-income households with young children by completing healthy housing assessments and interventions, coordinating with agencies and community-based organizations to bring additional health and safety resources, and strengthening community capacity for addressing and incorporating lead safety compliance and healthy housing principles. ACHHD also keeps a Lead-Safe Housing Listing that informs the renting community of housing units that have been made safe from City Council/RSA Agenda 180 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
54 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
lead-based paint hazards. Only units completed through the program are eligible for the Lead Registry.

These units were determined to be lead-safe following their participation in the Alameda County Affordable Lead-Safe Housing Program funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control.

Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families According to the 2017-2021 American Community Survey, 12.8% of all Union City households earned under $50,000 which is considered extremely-low to very low-income depending on household size.

Additionally, another 17.3% of all Union City households earned between $50,000 and $75,000 which is considered very-low to low-income depending on household size. Conversely, the 2022 area median income for Alameda County was $106,000. Many lower income families are not keeping pace with this median income even though it dropped from the prior year. Low-income families often have difficulty securing and retaining housing and if they able to retain housing, they often times do not have additional income to pay for other needs such as food, child care, health care and dependable transportation. Living from paycheck to paycheck causes families to be in constant danger of becoming homeless or returning to homelessness.

The public services programs that the City funds through the CDBG program and other sources of funding are intended to support the service needs of extremely-low and very low income families and individuals. For example, the City supports Centro de Servicios and Union City Family Center, which provide a range of safety net services such as food, counseling, referrals, assistance with public assistance applications and legal aid.

The City and other HOME Consortium jurisdictions are also working to implement the EveryOne Home Plan, which addresses the housing-related needs of extremely low-income persons with serious mental illness, those living with HIV/AIDS, and those who are homeless including homeless veterans. There are also several countywide programs that help extremely low-income families. For example, the Shelter Plus Care and the Supportive Housing Programs serve the homeless through housing rental assistance and supportive services and aim to reduce the number of people living in poverty in the County. Additionally, the Alameda County Self-Sufficiency Program provides employment services, transportation, child care, drug and alcohol abuse treatment and mental health services to help individuals comply with their welfare–to-work plans.

Through this multitude of efforts, in collaboration with non profit agencies, the City is continually working to help reduce the number of families living in poverty. With that said, there are significant challenges to accomplishing this long term goal. The biggest barrier to the provision of services to lower income families and those at risk of becoming homeless is the lack of adequate state, county, and federal funds for affordable housing and social service activities.

City Council/RSA Agenda 181 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
55 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
A primary strength of the housing and community development delivery systems is the coordination of efforts between the jurisdictions and the groups that oversee these efforts on a countywide basis.

However, the City’s goal is to continue improving institutional structure; therefore the City will be making the following efforts:
• Continue to work with the other local jurisdictions as part of the HOME Technical Advisory Committee (HTAC) which, meets regularly to develop housing programs and policies and to discuss matters relating to federal housing and community development funding sources available. HTAC also works to ensure that projects compliment rather than duplicate efforts and that policies and programs have some consistency throughout the HOME Consortium; • Continue to build and improve relationships with local service providers; and • Continue to coordinate with EveryOne Home.

Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
The City’s Housing and Community Development (HCD) division of the Economic and Community Development department is charged with implementing the City's housing initiatives and coordinates actively with jurisdictions and public and private organizations. The City plans to take the following actions to enhance coordination in the implementation of the City’s Action Plan:
• Continue to work with the other local jurisdictions as part of the HOME Technical Advisory Committee (HTAC);
• Continue to engage the City’s Human Relations Commission to obtain citizen input on housing and community needs in the City;
• Continue to coordinate with EveryOne Home;
• Continue to collaborate with the Alameda County, private housing developers, lenders, and nonprofit housing developers in order to create more affordable housing; • Continue to fund nonprofit agencies serving low income residents; and • Encourage collaboration and cooperation amongst local service providers.

Discussion
Please see discussion above.

City Council/RSA Agenda 182 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
56 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Program Specific Requirements
AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4) Introduction
The below section identifies other program specific requirements. The City of Union City plans to use at a minimum 70% of CDBG funds to assist low- and moderate-income persons.

Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.

1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0

2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan 0

3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0

4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 0

5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements

1. The amount of urgent need activities 0

2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income.Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 70.00% City Council/RSA Agenda 183 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
57 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Discussion
N/A
City Council/RSA Agenda 184 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
58 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Attachment 1: Summary of Citizen Participation Efforts
TBD
City Council/RSA Agenda 185 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
59 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Attachment 2: 2023-2024 Proposed Budget
City Council/RSA Agenda 186 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Annual Action Plan
2023
60 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Attachment 3: SF 424 and Certifications

TO BE COMPLETED
City Council/RSA Agenda 187 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-23

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY ACCEPTING THE UPDATED PUBLIC SERVICE NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND 2) AWARDING $245,000 ANNUALLY FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR PUBLIC SERVICE GRANTS FOR FY 23/24 AND FY 24/25, SUBJECT TO FINAL ADOPTION OF THE FY 23/24 AND FY 24/25 CITY BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City allocates Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) funds and General Fund monies towards its Public Services grant process, which allocates funding to social service providers who provide support services to Union City residents; and WHEREAS, the City completed an updated Public Service Needs Assessment, labeled Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, to help with identifying the social service needs of the community; and
WHEREAS, the Public Service Needs Assessment included a robust outreach process including stakeholder meetings with social service providers and a community survey in multiple languages, which resulted in 620 responses from community members; and WHEREAS, the Public Service Needs Assessment identified a need for a variety of homeless services, senior support services, and youth support services in the community; and WHEREAS, the Public Service Needs Assessment informed the City’s Public Services Grant process for FY 23/24 and FY 25/26, and will inform future Public Service grant opportunities; and
WHEREAS, as part of the City’s Public Services grant process, staff prioritized the identified needs from the Assessment when reviewing grant applications; and WHEREAS, the City received seventeen (17) grant applications totaling over $742,853 in requests; and
WHEREAS, a subcommittee of the Human Relations Committee (HRC) met on May 1, 2023 and May 2, 2023 to review the application scores and formulate funding recommendations.

The Subcommittee took into consideration the applicant’s score; their ability to meet the City’s contracting requirements, especially if a request was made for CDBG funding; their demonstrated track record serving Union City (if applicable), and whether the social service provider served homeless residents, seniors, and provided youth services consistent with the recommendations included in the Public Service Needs Assessment; and
WHEREAS, the Subcommittee’s recommendations were then presented to the HRC at their May 4th, 2023 meeting and they voted 7-0 in favor of the Subcommittee’s recommendations with the ability for staff to make adjustments in order to ensure the City met its CDBG guidelines and requirements and better leverage those funds in an effort to maximize General Fund dollars; and ATTACHMENT 2
City Council/RSA Agenda 188 Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Resolution No. XXXX-23