Union City City Council
February 10, 2026

February 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 1 of 4
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

NOTICE AND AGENDA

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAIME PATIÑO, Vice Mayor (District 2)
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember (District 1)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, February 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM
City Hall – Tom Kitayama City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER

1.1. Pledge of Allegiance

1.2. Roll Call

2. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

2.1. Presentation by Alameda County District Attorney Ursula Jones Dickson

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Each person who wishes to speak during the Oral Communications section for non-agenda items will have up to three minutes. The Chair may shorten this time if there are many speakers or the City Council has a full agenda. If you want to speak during the first Oral Communications section, please complete a speaker card with your name and city of residence. You may also provide a mailing address if you would like to receive future information from the City. Filling out a speaker card and providing your name, city of residence, or mailing address is not required to speak, but it helps keep accurate records.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be approved together with one motion. If any item requires discussion, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed separately.

4.1. Approve the January 27, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes February 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 2 of 4
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda

4.2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of Union City Appointing a Regular Member and an Alternate Member to the Park and Recreation Commission

4.3. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Consulting Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc., for Building Division Support

4.4. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Rush Truck Center to Purchase One (1) Replacement Vehicle, in the Amount of $76,000

4.5. Adopt a Resolution Accepting $23,000 from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air, Administered by the Alameda County Transportation Commission, Amending the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund Budget, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Project Funding Agreement for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard, City Project No. 25-55

4.6. Waive Further Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Amending Union City Municipal Code Section 2.21.020 “Creation – Membership” to Add a Third Alternate Commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission

5. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

5.1. Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs, Annual Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter, and Ramp Repair Project, City Project No. 25-03

5.2. Adopt a Resolution Accepting $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Increasing the Revenue Projection in the Capital Projects Grants Fund by $16,728,000, and Appropriating the $16,728,000 to the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04

6. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

7. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL

8. GOOD OF THE ORDER

9. ADJOURNMENT

MEETING INFORMATION
The City Council is authorized to take action only on items listed on this agenda. Public comment is both welcomed and encouraged on all agenda items. If you wish to address the Council, please complete a speaker card and submit it before the Oral Communications section.

Regular City Council meetings are held in person on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587.

Meetings can also be observed via Zoom: http://citycouncil-live.unioncity.org.

Meetings are broadcast live on UCTV Channel 15 and live-streamed on the City's website:
https://bit.ly/3x9mEiR.

February 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 3 of 4
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda
Public Comment: Members of the public cannot provide comments via Zoom unless specifically permitted, as detailed below. Remote access is subject to technical availability. If the Zoom platform or other technology fails, the City Council will proceed with the meeting in person unless prohibited by law.

Public Records: Documents related to agenda items are available for review on the City's website (https://www.unioncity.org) or during business hours at the City Clerk's Office, 34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587.

Accessibility: If you require special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (510) 675-5448 at least 72 hours before the meeting. Closed captioning is available for all regular City Council meetings.

ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
In-Person Public Comment:

Members of the public may address the Council on any agenda item or during the Public Input portion of the meeting. To speak, please fill out a speaker card with your name and city of residence. If you would like a follow-up from the City, you may also provide your mailing address. Completing a speaker card and providing your name, city, or mailing address are not required to make a public comment but are requested for record-keeping purposes.

Written Comment:

To submit written comments on an agenda item or during Public Comment, please email [email protected]. Include "Public Comment" in the subject line and reference the agenda item number. Written comments will be forwarded to the City Council and made publicly available.

Public Comment via Zoom:

As noted above, the public may not address the Council via Zoom unless required by AB 2449. If the City is required to provide this opportunity, the Mayor will announce it at the beginning of the meeting. If allowed, raise your virtual hand on Zoom to indicate that you would like to speak on a specific agenda item.

CITY COUNCIL NORMS AND GUIDELINES
(Resolution No. 6129-23; Adopted May 23, 2023)
The Union City Council abides by the following norms:

1. We conduct ourselves in a professional manner, treat everyone with respect, and act with high integrity, always putting the interests of the City of Union City ahead of self-interests in accordance with our code of ethics.

2. We respect the Council-Manager form of government, and do not interfere with the City Manager's role or any professional duties of City staff.

3. We recognize that matters of confidential nature are to be kept private and undisclosed.

4. We respect each other's opinions and are supportive of each other's work advocating for the City, and we ensure that all voices are heard. We do not criticize others for having a different point of view, and we agree to disagree respectfully.

5. We understand that the City Council acts as a body, all members are equal, and February 10, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 4 of 4
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Agenda
policy direction is only given by a majority vote of the City Council. Once a decision is made, all members of the City Council must respect the City Council's direction.

6. We will be prepared for City Council meetings and ask our questions of the City Manager in advance so we can avoid surprising City staff at meetings.

7. We do not criticize City staff publicly or to others and will refrain from directing them. Instead, we will take our concerns and questions privately to the City Manager.

8. We will govern on an at-large basis, although elected by districts. We will maintain a citywide perspective and consider the needs and interests of the entire community.

9. We will continue to allocate resources based on long-term strategic priorities and efforts, with consideration of citywide service levels and financial capacity.

10. We understand customer service is the priority and each member of the City Council will help constituents regardless of the district in which they reside or from which a Councilmember themselves is elected.

11. We recognize the significant importance of attendance and participation at City Council meetings in proceeding with City business. All members of the City Council should endeavor to miss no more than two regular meetings per calendar year absent extraordinary circumstances. Members of the City Council should, absent unforeseen circumstances, provide a minimum of sixty days' notice to the City Council of planned absences during the Good of the Order or Items Referred by Council portion of the City Council agenda, as appropriate.

May these Council Norms be administered and enforced in the following manner:

1. Councilmembers have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met by the Council, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government.

2. The Mayor and the Council have the responsibility to intervene when action of its members are in violation of Council Norms.

3. The City Council can review and revise the Council Norms as needed.

4. During City Council discussions, deliberations, and proceedings, the Mayor is designated with the primary responsibility to ensure that Councilmembers adhere to the Council Norms.

CERTIFICATION OF MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA POSTING
This notice and agenda were posted on the City's website and the City Hall bulletin board at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date, in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. /s/Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk/Secretary to the City of Union City Successor Agency City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 1 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 2.1
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Presentation by Alameda County District Attorney Ursula Jones Dickson

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the Council accepts the Presentation.

Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. PowerPoint Presentation
5 of 251
City of Union City, Council Meeting
Ursula Jones Dickson
Alameda County District Attorney
February 10, 2026
Protect. Empower. Restore.

Supporting Survivors Across Alameda County
6 of 251
Mission
Ethically prosecute those who commit crimes, uphold the rights of victims and provide them with compassionate support, and protect the communities that we serve. Collaborate with justice and community partners and foster policies that prioritize public safety and restore public trust. Reinforce innovative programs that provide opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration, and to enhance the lives of the residents of Alameda County.
3 2
7 of 251
Mandate
The District Attorney’s Office represents the People of the State of California ethically, professionally and with integrity, in criminal, civil and juvenile matters. The DA’s Office will always pursue the truth, demonstrate commitment to fair and equitable justice for all, and ensure that victims of crime are treated with respect, dignity, and empathy.
4 3
8 of 251
Meet the DA
Ursula Jones Dickson
District Attorney Ursula Jones Dickson is a dedicated and visionary leader committed to delivering justice with integrity, fairness, and transparency. With over two decades of legal experience—including her service as an Alameda County Superior Court judge and former deputy district attorney—DA Jones Dickson brings a deep understanding of both the law and the communities it serves. Her appointment as District Attorney marks a return to principled prosecution rooted in accountability, public safety, and victim advocacy.

Since taking office, DA Jones Dickson has worked tirelessly to rebuild trust, enhance community engagement, and ensure that justice is applied equitably across Alameda County. Guided by compassion and driven by excellence, she is focused on smart reforms, strong partnerships with law enforcement, and a clear commitment to keeping our neighborhoods safe while uplifting those most impacted by the justice system.
4 9 of 251
East County Hall of
Justice (ECHOJ)
Consumer,
Environmental, and
Worker Protection
Fremont Hall of Justice Wiley W. Manuel
Courthouse Family Justice Center Victim Witness
Assistance
Our Branches
René C. Davidson
Courthouse
Juvenile Justice
Center
5 10 of 251
Rebuilding Community Trust
11 of 251
• Launched the Regional Organized Retail Theft Task Force: Established a countywide Organized Retail Theft Task Force to address repeat, organized offenders. Restructured the Organized Retail Theft Vertical Prosecution Unit to improve results. • Bolster Operations: Filled leadership positions, relaunched dormant grant and consumer protection initiatives, and began a top-to-bottom fiscal review. These actions will create a more transparent and accountable office. • Restored Prosecutorial Capacity: By removing internal bottlenecks, prosecutors were able to process cases more efficiently, reviewing over 22,386 referrals and increasing felony filings.
• Reaffirmed Commitment to Fair and Equitable Justice: Focused on consistent, community-informed decision-making rooted in public trust, service, and legal integrity. 7
Strengthening Your DA's Office
12 of 251
• Advanced Gun Violence Prevention: The District Attorney worked to ensure that Alameda County was one of only four counties selected for the AB 1344 Gun Violence Restraining Order Pilot Program, thereby expanding collaboration with law enforcement and providing prosecutors with a vital tool to intervene before tragedy occurs.
• Strengthened Community Stakeholder Engagement: Convened safety conversations with business owners, survivors, and faith leaders across Alameda County to hear directly from the community.
• Protected Resources: Fought against devastating budget cuts that would have further harmed victims – successfully securing new funding to protect victims and support the Alameda County Family Justice Center and the Trauma Recovery Center. These efforts preserved essential lifelines for thousands of residents. 8 Serving Survivors & Supporting Safety
13 of 251
Justice By the Numbers
14 of 251
Referrals Reviewed
Each referral may include one
or more criminal charges.

The offense level reflects the
most serious conduct the
suspect was arrested for.

TOTAL REFERRALS
First 10 Months
Feb. 18 – Dec. 18
2022: 17,690
2023: 16,828
2024: 17,251
2025: 18,818
5,189
5,171
5,316
5,856
12,501
11,657
11,935
12,962
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000
2022
2023
2024
2025
Number of Referrals Reviewed
(February 18 - December 18)

MISDEMEANORS FELONIES
TOTAL NUMBER OF REFERRALS REVIEWED ( FEB. 18 - DEC. 18 BY YEAR) 10 15 of 251
First 10 Months:

February 18 – December 18
2022 - 2025

MISDEMEANOR
REFERRALS 2022 2023 2024 2025
Police Reports
Charged 6,461 6,037 6,713 7,071
Police Reports
Given an
Alternative Action
824 627 676 980
Police Reports Not
Charged 5,216 4,993 4,546 4,911
TOTAL
MISDEMEANORS 12,501 11,657 11,935 12,962
FELONY
REFERRALS 2022 2023 2024 2025
Police Reports
Charged 3,644 3,291 3,715 4,232
Police Reports
Given an Alternative
Action
475 539 476 644
Police Reports Not
Charged 1,070 1,341 1,125 980
TOTAL FELONIES 5,189 5,171 5,316 5,856
Referral Outcomes
Misdemeanors
First 10 Months: February 18 – December 18
Felonies
First 10 Months: February 18 – December 18
Note: Alternative actions include diversion
11 16 of 251
2 First 10 Months:

February 18 – December 18
2022 - 2025
The unit of measurement is the
police incident number and a
unique combination of a person
to reflect a criminal incident.

Each referral may include one
or more criminal charges.

This data only shows referrals
made by the police agencies
with a gun charge presented to
our office.
12 Referrals With a Gun Charge
1,444
1,299
1,340
1,432
1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 1,400 1,450 1,500
2022
2023
2024
2025
The Number of Referrals Reviewed
(February 18 - December 18)
Total Number of Gun Charge Referrals
Presented And Reviewed
17 of 251
8 Theft-Related Property Crime Cases
13 First 10 Months:

February 18 – December 18
2022 - 2025
Theft-Related Property Crime
(TRPC) cases are defined as those
containing at least one BSCCdefined TRPC Penal Code.
2,945
3,022
3,629
4,627
- 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
2022
2023
2024
2025
Number of Cases Filed
(February 18 - December 18)
Total Number of Theft-Related Property Crime
Filed Cases
18 of 251
8 Theft-Related Property Crime Charges
14 First 11 Months:

February 18 – December 18
2022 - 2025
Theft-Related Property Crime
(TRPC) cases are defined as those
containing at least one BSCCdefined TRPC Penal Code.
3,871
4,090
5,169
5,956
- 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000
2022
2023
2024
2025
Number of Cases Filed
(February 18 - December 18)
Total Number of Theft-Related Property Crime
Filed Charges
19 of 251
• Property Crimes
• Domestic Violence
• Aggravated Assault
• Identity Theft
• Battery
• Drunk Driving
• Violation of a Protective Court Order
We offer services to all crime types, including but not limited to… 15 First 10 Months:

February 18 – December 18
2022 - 2025
On average, we provide a total
of 39 services to each victim
between 2022 and 2025.

Most services provided are
guaranteed by Marsy's Law and
provided by the ACDAO.

New Victims Receiving Services
15 • Assault with Deadly Weapons
• Robbery
• Criminal Threats
7,005
5,843
7,332
7,646
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
2022
2023
2024
2025
Number of New Victims and Clients
New Victims and Clients Receiving Services
Between 2022 - 2025
20 of 251
The Work Ahead
21 of 251
8 What’s Ahead — Fair Charging, Safer Communities
17 Key Priorities:
• Developing a Hate Crimes Unit: We will be providing community education about hate crimes, hate incidents, and hate speech, as well as actively prosecuting hate crime cases. • Restoring our Human Trafficking, Wage Theft and Labor Exploitation Efforts: We’re reestablishing focused efforts to prosecute traffickers and protect victims of exploitation and wage theft.

As we continue to serve the people of Alameda County, our focus is on delivering justice through decisive, fair, and effective prosecution for victims of crime. • Improving and Expanding Victim Witness Services: We’re enhancing Victim Witness Advocates training to better support victims throughout the legal process—from charging to trial.
• Launching our Inaugural Annual Report: Released in January 2025 to highlight the work over the past year.

VIEW THE DA'S DOCKET AT:

DA.ALAMEDACOUNTYCA.GOV OR SCAN THE QR CODE.
22 of 251
8 18
• We are committed to working alongside community leaders to improve public safety, increase trust, and ensure accountability through fair charging decisions. • Our engagement efforts support better justice outcomes:

Rebuilding Community Trust
• Town Halls and Safety Forums: Help our office
understand real concerns that impact safety and
charging decisions
• Community Listening Sessions: Inform how we
apply the law with fairness, clarity, and
consistency across diverse communities.
• Continual Conversations with Local Leaders: A
space for regular dialogue with neighborhood
leaders and other community stakeholders on how
charging, enforcement, and prevention affect the
communities they serve.
23 of 251
8 19
• Neighborhood organizations are essential partners in building safer communities. You are often the first to hear concerns, offer comfort after harm, and guide community trust in public institutions. • Your involvement strengthens our legal response and our service to the people of Alameda County. • How We Can Work Together:
• Host a Listening Session or Safety Forum: Invite the DA’s Office to engage your networks, neighborhood groups, service or faith organizations directly, to help us better understand community concerns, shape charging decisions, and build trust in communities that may distrust law enforcement or lack information on legal rights. • Encourage Crime Reporting: Neighborhood leaders often hear of threats, bias, or harm before they’re reported to law enforcement. Encouraging timely reporting helps us respond quickly, investigate thoroughly, and ensure accountability under the law. • Share DA Office Resources: Make information available in your business, newsletters or congregation about victim services, crime reporting, and legal rights. Many victims are more likely to seek help when trusted community voices connect them to our office.

Partnering to Promote Safety and Justice
24 of 251
8 CONSUMER, ENVIRONMENTAL &

WORKER PROTECTION/PUBLIC

ASSISTANCE FRAUD
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 650
Oakland, CA 94621
Phone: (510) 383-8600
Email: [email protected]

EAST COUNTY HALL OF JUSTICE
5149 Gleason Drive, #220
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone: (925) 803-7171
Email: [email protected]

FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER
470 27th Street
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510) 267-8800
Email: [email protected]

FREMONT HALL OF JUSTICE
39439 Paseo Padre Parkway
Fremont, CA 94538
Phone: (510) 795-2500
Email: [email protected]

JUVENILE JUSTICE
2500 Fairmont Drive, Suite C3071
San Leandro, CA 94578
Phone: (510) 667-4470
Email: [email protected]
RENE C. DAVIDSON

COURTHOUSE
1225 Fallon Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510) 272-6222
Email: [email protected]

VICTIM WITNESS ASSISTANCE
1401 Lakeside Drive, Suite 802
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510) 272-6180
Email: [email protected]
WILEY W. MANUEL COURTHOUSE
661 Washington Street, Room 225
Oakland, CA 94607
Phone: (510) 268-7500
Email: [email protected]
Contact Information
20 25 of 251
Questions?
Community Outreach and Legislation Division
21 L.D. Louis
Email: [email protected]
Austin Bruckner Carrillo
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (510) 272-5014
26 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 1 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.1
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approve the January 27, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council approve the meeting minutes.

Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Action Minutes
27 of 251

MINUTES

CITY OF UNION CITY

CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING
GARY SINGH, Mayor
JAMIE PATIÑO, Vice Mayor (District 2)
LANCE NISHIHIRA, Councilmember (District 1)
JEFF WANG, Councilmember (District 3)
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA, Councilmember (District 4)
Tuesday, January 27, 2026 | 7:00 PM
City Hall – Tom Kitayama City Council Chambers
34009 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587

1. CALL TO ORDER
Vice Mayor Patiño called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.

1.1. Pledge of Allegiance
Vice Mayor Patiño led the Pledge of Allegiance.

1.2. Roll Call
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Lance Nishihira, Councilmember
Jeff Wang, Councilmember
Scott Sakakihara, Councilmember
Jaime Patiño, Vice Mayor
Absent Gary Singh, Mayor

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Vice Mayor Patiño opened Oral Communications. There being no speakers, Vice Mayor Patiño closed Oral Communications.
28 of 251
January 27, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 2 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion: Approve the Consent Calendar.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Wang
SECONDER: Councilmember Sakakihara
AYES: Councilmember Nishihira, Councilmember Wang, Councilmember Sakakihara, Vice Mayor Patiño
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Singh

3.1. Approve the January 9, 2026 City Council Special Meeting Action Minutes A motion was made to approve the minutes.

3.2. Approve the January 13, 2026 City Council Special Closed Session Action Minutes
A motion was made to approve the minutes.

3.3. Approve the January 13, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes A motion was made to approve the minutes.

3.4. Approve the January 20, 2026 City Council Special Meeting Action Minutes A motion was made to approve the minutes.

3.5. Adopt a Resolution Appointing Individuals to Serve on the Arts & Culture Commission, Economic Development Advisory Team, Human Relations Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, and Senior Citizens Commission
A motion was made to adopt the resolution.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-007

3.6. Adopt a Resolution Creating an Alternate Member Position for the Economic Development Advisory Team and Appointing Chioma Chuks-Orji to Serve as Alternate Member
A motion was made to adopt the resolution.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-008

3.7. Adopt a Resolution Accepting Completion of the Citywide Full Trash Capture Device Installation Project, City Project No. 25-11, and Authorizing Release of the Retention Payment to United Storm Water, Inc.

A motion was made to adopt the resolution.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-009

3.8. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Renewal of a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement with Softchoice Corporation, Inc. and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement
29 of 251
January 27, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 3 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
A motion was made to adopt the resolution.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-010

3.9. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Award a Contract to Municipal Maintenance Equipment for the Purchase of a Truck-Mounted Debris Collector, in the Amount of $274,880.34, Authorizing the Transfer of $288,624.36 from the Solid Waste Street Restoration Fund to the Fleet Replacement Fund, and Authorizing the Appropriation of $288,624.36 from the Fleet Replacement Fund to Fund the Purchase of a Truck-Mounted Debris Collector
A motion was made to adopt the resolution.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-011

3.10. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Union City Transit and Paratransit Title VI Program
A motion was made to adopt the resolution.

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-012

3.11. Accept a Report on the Union City Transit Winter 2026 Service Changes, Effective Saturday, February 21, 2026
A motion was made to accept the report.

3.12. Waive Further Reading and Adopt an Ordinance for Zoning Text Amendment (AT-25-003) to Title 18, Zoning, of the Union City Municipal Code to Amend Chapters 18.08 Definitions; 18.27, Village Mixed Use (VMU) District; 18.36, Commercial Districts; 18.50, Civic Facilities (CF) District; and 18.92, Open Space (OS) Zoning District, and Find That the Proposed Amendments are Exempt From the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(B)(3)
A motion was made to adopt the ordinance.

Enactment No.: Ordinance No. 2026-002

4. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

4.1. Consider a Resolution to Authorize the City of Union City to Purchase Tickets to the New Haven Schools Foundation Annual Fund-Raising Event City Manager Malloy provided staff presentation and responded to questions from the Council.

Vice Mayor Patiño opened public comment. There being no speakers, Vice Mayor Patiño closed public comment.

Motion: Allocate $2,400 in General Fund monies to purchase a sponsorship for the New Haven Schools Foundation Gala.

RESULT: Fail
MOVER: Councilmember Nishihira
SECONDER: Councilmember Sakakihara
30 of 251
January 27, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 4 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira and Sakakihara
NOES: Councilmember Wang and Vice Mayor Patiño
ABSENT: Mayor Singh

4.2. Waive Full Reading and Introduce By Title Only An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Section 2.21.020 “Creation - Membership” of the Union City Municipal Code to Add a Third Alternate Commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission
City Clerk Pham provided staff presentation and responded to questions from the Council.

Vice Mayor Patiño opened public comment. There being no speakers, Vice Mayor Patiño closed public comment.

Motion: Waive full reading and introduce by title only an ordinance amending Section 2.21.020 of the Union City Municipal Code to add a third alternate commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Wang
SECONDER: Councilmember Sakakihara
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Wang, Sakakihara, and Vice Mayor Patiño
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Singh

4.3. Adopt a Resolution Approving an Exception to the 180-Day Waiting Period for Post-Retirement Employment of Jacquelyn Acosta to Fill the Critically Needed Position of Extra Help for the Finance Director Pursuant to Government Code Sections 7522.56(f)(1) and 21224 and Approve an Employment Agreement with Jacquelyn Acosta to Serve as Extra Help to the Finance Director
City Attorney Kokotaylo provided staff presentation and responded to questions from the Council.

Vice Mayor Patiño opened public comment. There being no speakers, Vice Mayor Patiño closed public comment.

Motion: Adopt a resolution approving an exception to the 180-day waiting period for post-retirement employment for Jacquelyn Acosta and approve an employment agreement for extra-help services to the Finance Director.

RESULT: Pass
MOVER: Councilmember Nishihira
SECONDER: Councilmember Sakakihara
AYES: Councilmembers Nishihira, Wang, Sakakihara, and Vice Mayor Patiño
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Singh

Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2026-013
31 of 251
January 27, 2026 | 7:00 PM Page 5 of 5
City Council / Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes

5. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
There were none.

6. ITEMS REFERRED BY COUNCIL
Councilmember Sakakihara reported attending the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, an Ava Community Energy meeting, and the Climate Action Task Force meeting.

Councilmember Wang reported attending the Youth Commission meeting, Climate Action Task Force meeting, and League of California Cities Public Safety Policy Committee meeting.

Councilmember Nishihira reported no recent meetings to report. He announced upcoming meetings: the Legislation and Policy Subcommittee on February 2; a City and District meeting on February 12; the Human Relations Commission meeting on January 28; and a StopWaste meeting on January 29.

Vice Mayor Patiño reported attending the League of California Cities Public Safety Policy Committee meeting in Sacramento and noted that he would be attending a webinar on CARE Court and the City’s role on February 3.

7. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Councilmember Sakakihara reported attending a tour of the On Lok facility on January 15 and attending the League of California Cities Revenue and Taxation Committee meeting on January 22.

Councilmember Wang reported participating in the Alameda County Point-in-Time Count for homelessness, attending legislative meetings in Sacramento, and participating in a preopening event for a senior health facility scheduled to open in March.

Councilmember Nishihira announced an upcoming Tri-City Veterans Mixer scheduled for January 29, 2026.

Vice Mayor Patiño reported attending meetings in Washington, D.C., related to the National League of Cities; participating in a National League of Cities Board orientation meeting; attending upcoming webinars; and receiving a scholarship to complete coursework through the National League of Cities University.

8. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Patiño adjourned the Meeting at 7:34 PM.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council/Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Union City on February 10, 2026.
/s/Thai Nam Pham, MMC, CPMC
City Clerk
32 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.2
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of Union City Appointing a Regular Member and an Alternate Member to the Park and
Recreation Commission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
An unscheduled vacancy occurred on the Park and Recreation Commission due to the automatic removal of a commissioner under the Union City Municipal Code for failure to satisfy mandatory training requirements. In accordance with City policy and Resolution No. 2025-029, which standardizes appointment and expiration dates for new appointments to align with the calendar year, the City Council may appoint an eligible individual to fill the unexpired term.

This report recommends that the City Council consider and approve the Mayor’s appointments of: 1) the current Alternate Commissioner Adrian Hipolito to the vacant regular seat, with the appointment commencing on the date of adoption of the resolution and expiring December 31, 2029, and 2) Inderjeet Bhambra to serve as an Alternate Member commencing on the date of adoption and expiring December 31, 2029.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
The recommended actions support the City’s Strategic Plan goals by promoting effective governance and continuity of advisory bodies:
• Goal B – Governance and Organizational Effectiveness: Ensures the Parks and Recreation Commission remains fully constituted and able to carry out its advisory responsibilities in accordance with adopted policies and the Municipal Code.
• Goal E – Communication and Outreach: Supports sustained community engagement by maintaining consistent representation and participation on a key advisory commission.
33 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.2
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 February 10, 2026

BACKGROUND
On January 29, 2026, the City Clerk issued a Notice of Unscheduled Vacancy for the Park and Recreation Commission pursuant to the Municipal Code. The vacancy was noticed in accordance with applicable requirements.

Adrian Hipolito currently serves as an Alternate Member of the Park and Recreation Commission and meets all eligibility requirements for appointment as a regular member.

Promoting an existing alternate ensures continuity, preserves institutional knowledge, and minimizes disruption to commission operations.

Inderjeet Bhambra was interviewed by the City Council during the January 2026 Boards, Commissions, and Committees interview process and is eligible for appointment as an Alternate Member. Appointing a previously interviewed candidate supports efficiency and continuity in the City’s appointment process.

DISCUSSION
The proposed appointments are consistent with the City’s Boards, Commissions, and Committees appointment framework and align with Resolution No. 2025-029, adopted on February 25, 2025, which standardizes appointment start dates on the date of adoption and expiration dates on December 31 of the final year of the term for new appointments.

Pursuant to Union City Municipal Code Section 2.20.030, appointments to both regular and alternate commissioner seats are made by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Alternate commissioners do not automatically succeed to vacant regular seats, and vacancies, whether for regular or alternate positions, must be filled through a formal appointment by the Mayor with City Council approval.

Appointing an existing alternate to a regular seat provides operational stability and continuity for the Parks and Recreation Commission. If approved, Adrian Hipolito will serve the remainder of the standardized term expiring December 31, 2029, and Inderjeet Bhambra will serve as an Alternate Member for a term expiring December 31, 2029.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council consider and approve the Mayor’s appointments and adopt a resolution confirming:

1. Adrian Hipolito to fill the unexpired term on the Parks and Recreation Commission pursuant to the Union City Municipal Code, with the appointment commencing on the date of adoption of the resolution and expiring December 31, 2029; and

2. Inderjeet Bhambra as an Alternate Member to the Parks and Recreation Commission, with the appointment commencing on the date of adoption of the resolution and expiring December 31, 2029.
34 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.2
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 February 10, 2026 Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Draft Resolution
35 of 251
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

APPOINTING A REGULAR MEMBER AND AN ALTERNATE MEMBER

TO THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Commission is an advisory body established pursuant to the Union City Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, an unscheduled vacancy occurred on the Park and Recreation Commission due to the automatic removal of a commissioner under the Union City Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- 029 to standardize the appointment and expiration dates for new appointments to City boards, commissions, and committees to align with the calendar year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Union City Municipal Code Section 2.20.030, the Mayor is authorized to appoint members to City boards, commissions, and committees, including both regular and alternate members, subject to confirmation by the City Council; and WHEREAS, alternate commissioners do not automatically succeed to vacant regular seats, and vacancies for both regular and alternate positions must be filled through a formal appointment by the Mayor with City Council approval; and WHEREAS, the Mayor has recommended appointments to fill the vacant regular seat and an alternate seat on the Park and Recreation Commission.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby:

1. Approves the Mayor’s appointment of Adrian Hipolito to the Park and Recreation Commission to serve a term commencing on the date of adoption of this resolution and expiring December 31, 2029.

2. Approves the Mayor’s appointment of Inderjeet Bhambra as an Alternate Member to the Park and Recreation Commission to serve a term commencing on the date of adoption of this resolution and expiring December 31, 2029.

3. Directs the City Clerk to update the City’s official Boards, Commissions, and Committees roster accordingly.
36 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Appointments to Parks and Recreation Commission

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
37 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 2 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.3
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Consulting Services Agreement with 4LEAF, Inc., for Building Division Support

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff is requesting the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) authorizing the City Manager to enter into a consulting services agreement with 4LEAF, Inc. for Building Division support in an amount not to exceed $750,000.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Although this agenda item does not align with a specific Strategic Plan goal, approval ensures the Building Division will continue to provide essential services to the community.

BACKGROUND
Third-party consultants are used by the Building Division to support its operations, including technical assistance to ensure applications are processed in a timely manner.

The City also uses consultants to access external professional resources for technical expertise and to conduct complex plan reviews and inspections, while adhering to the Building Division's service timelines.

DISCUSSION
4LEAF, Inc. is an experienced firm that has previously supported the Building Division, including the Neighborhood Preservation Program, across a variety of technical areas.

Staff augmentation in office and field operations, plan checking, and consulting on large, complex permits are all services available within the scope of this contract. See Attachment 1, Exhibit A, for all of the services provided by 4LEAF, Inc. The City has successfully used 4LEAF, Inc. in the past and would like to continue using its expertise on large developments, such as the Station East Residential Mixed-Use/Residential project, through its completion.
38 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.3
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 2 February 10, 2026

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this agreement was included in the FY 2025-2026 and FY 2026-2027 Adopted Biennial Budget in Account Number 11041002-54110 (General Fund – ECD/Building and Safety - Professional/Consulting). Additionally, the plan check fees collected by the Building Division, which are deposited into the General Fund, will cover the cost of any plan checking services.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with 4LEAF, Inc. for Building Division support in an amount not-to-exceed $750,000.

Prepared by: Valerie Avendano, Chief Building Official
Submitted by: Carmela Campbell, Economic and Community Development Director Attachments

1. Draft Resolution

2. Exhibit A – Scope of Work
39 of 251
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH 4LEAF, INC., FOR

BUILDING DIVISION SUPPORT
WHEREAS, third-party consultants are utilized by the Building Division to support its operations, including technical assistance with the timely processing of applications.

The City also utilizes consultants to provide access to external professional resources needed to provide technical expertise and conduct complex plan review and inspection services while adhering to the service timelines of the Building Division; and WHEREAS, the consultant’s scope of work, labeled Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, funding for this agreement was included in the FY 2025-2026 and FY 2026-2027 Adopted Biennial Budget in Account Number 11041002-54110 (General Fund – ECD/Building and Safety - Professional/Consulting). Additionally, the plan check fees collected by the Building Division, which are deposited into the General Fund, will cover the cost of any plan checking services; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with 4LEAF, Inc. for Building Division support in an amount not to exceed $750,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into a consulting services agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with 4LEAF, Inc. for Building Division Support, in an amount not-to-exceed $750,000.
40 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
4LEAF, inc. CSA for Building Division Support

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Scope of Work
41 of 251
City of Union City Page 1
Scope of Services December 17, 2025

SCOPE OF WORK
Plan Review Services
4LEAF will provide Plan Review for any and all types of structures to ensure compliance with all adopted codes, local ordinances (including Tier 1 of Cal Green, if required) and State and federal laws that pertain to Building and Safety, and for compliance with the adopted International Code Council (ICC) Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical, National Fire Protection codes and standards, and the Accessibility and Noise and Energy Conservation requirements as mandated by the State of California Title 24, State of California Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, the State of California Certified Access Specialist (CASp) compliance, and all other applicable ordinances. We provide these services for project types including Single-Family Dwellings, large MultiFamily Mixed-Use Dwelling Units, Commercial, and Industrial.

Approach
We understand that the specific building plan review responsibilities will include, but are not limited to:
• Examining plans, drawings, specifications, computations documents, soils reports, and additional data; • Ascertaining whether projects are in accordance with applicable building and fire codes, and City ordinances, including but not limited to Title 24 and Title 25; • Performing such reviews as structural, MEP, green building, fire and life safety, grading and drainage; • Reviewing plans to ensure conformity to the required strengths, stresses, strains, loads, and stability as per the applicable laws;
• Reviewing plans to ensure conformity with use and occupancy classification, general building heights and areas, types of construction, fire resistance construction and protection systems, means of egress, accessibility, structural design, soils and foundations; and masonry; • Providing additional plan review services as requested by the City; • Conducting all plan review at the City Department or at a site mutually agreed upon in writing and; • Supplying all plan review staff with all code books and other basic professional references.

On- and Off-Site Review
4LEAF can supply Registered Professional Engineers to the City to work on-site performing structural plan review and non-structural reviews at the jurisdiction’s discretion. Our experience includes checking for compliance with the structural, life-safety, accessibility, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, fire, and local codes/ordinances. 4LEAF’s EZPlan Review
EZPlan Review is 4LEAF’s in-house tracking software that acts as a communication tool between 4LEAF and the jurisdictions we work with. The use of EZPlan makes communication easy. This web portal allows users visualize project due dates, notes, and status updates so that projects can be followed from start to finish. Additionally, 4LEAF provides electronically stamped and uploaded copies of approved project plans, a value which saves clients time and resources. With the use of EZPlan, 4LEAF hopes to provide a level of ease and transparency during the off-site plan review process.

Exhibit A
42 of 251
City of Union City Page 2
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
QA/QC Review Process
Task 1 – Project Tracking Set-up
The first step of our process will be to set up the project in our system to enable 4LEAF and the City each to track the progress of the review. Our plan tracking procedures are designed to track each submittal throughout the review process and maintain accurate and comprehensive records for each submittal.

Task 2 - Complete Submittal Review
Upon receiving the plans from the City, 4LEAF will triage (preliminary plan review performed by 4LEAF plan review project lead) the submittal to verify that the submittal received is complete (i.e., all pertinent plans, calculations, reports, and other related documents) in order that we can begin our review. If the submitted package is incomplete, we will communicate with the City to discuss the deficient documents needed to proceed with our review.

Task 3 - Plan Review Assignment
After the triage process is performed and a complete package is verified, the project will be assigned to the most qualified Plans Examiner and a turnaround time will be established. We will log each application into our database the same day the plans are received to assure that they are routed in a timely manner and to allow for daily project tracking.

Task 4 - Plan Review
4LEAF will provide the project contact (Developer, Contractor, Architect, or Engineer) desired by the City with a list of any items needing correction and clarification to comply with applicable building codes, ordinances, and regulations. A correction list will be created based on the missing codes and ordinances.

Task 5 - Quality Control
Prior to submitting the plan review correction list to the City, the designated plan review project lead will review the correction list for adherence to applicable codes and ordinances as well as for accuracy and completeness.

After completion of our quality control review a correction list will be e-mailed to a designated staff member at the City or as directed by the City. The correction list and a 4LEAF transmittal form will include the following information: a description of the work, type of construction, occupancy group, square footage, number of floors, and sprinkler requirements.

Task 6 - Plan Review Rechecks
Plans received for rechecks will be reviewed for conformance. Our goal is to actively work with the designers to resolve all unresolved issues after our second review. If it appears that there are complicated issues that might cause a project to go beyond our second review, we will communicate directly with the designer to resolve these concerns.

Task 7 - Project Approval
Once the final plan reviews are completed and ready for approval, 4LEAF will organize the plans and supporting documents per the City processing requirements and return them to the City, along with our letter of completion.
43 of 251

City of Union City Page 3
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Turn-Around Times
4LEAF has a tremendous reputation for completing projects on-time and under budget. 4LEAF’s plan review team is widely recognized for quick turn-around times and prompt service. Off-site plan reviews are performed at our office, with plans transmitted by personal delivery or overnight service. The standard turn-around time is within 10 business days for residential plan reviews and within 10 days for commercial/industrial plan reviews; however, these timeframes are negotiable based on your needs. 4LEAF also provides Fire Plan Review services.

Type of
Plans Transportation Initial Review
Resubmittal
Review
Resubmittal
Review #2
Expedited
Review
Expedited
Resubmittal
*Residential < 24 Hours (pick
up & delivery) < 10 Days < 5 Days < 5 Days < 5 Days < 3 Days **MultiFamily < 24 Hours (pick
up & delivery) < 10 Days < 5 Days < 5 Days < 5 Days < 3 Days Commercial < 24 Hours (pick
up & delivery) < 10 Days < 5 Days < 5 Days < 5 Days < 3 Days ***Large
Commercial
> 15,000 s.f.
< 24 Hours (pick
up & delivery) Negotiable Negotiable Negotiable Negotiable Negotiable *Larger complex plan reviews can be negotiated to achieve the best possible pricing. 4LEAF has a proven track record of working with municipalities to provide expedited reviews with special discounted pricing.

Pick-up of all plans will be performed by 4LEAF staff within 24 hours of the City’s phone call or e-mail at no additional cost, 4LEAF staff will transport the plans to and from the City upon a phone call to the 4LEAF office or simply e-mail [email protected].

Document Control
When plans and documents are received for
review, 4LEAF’s Plan Review Manager and
Document Control Technician analyze the
project, creates a job number, and completes a
Job Setup Sheet. This form highlights both the
jurisdiction, applicable contact information, and
all project specific design criteria and notes. Jobs
are then transmitted through 4LEAF’s easily
accessed EZPlan Review Portal which tracks initial
and subsequent reviews and is open for view by
the client. The City and their customers can view
4LEAF’s plan review control log through 4LEAF’s
EZPlan Review Portal.
44 of 251
City of Union City Page 4
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Plans then get distributed for review to a 4LEAF team consisting of Plan Review Engineers, Architect (a licensed state professional) and/or an ICC Certified Plans Examiner, as applicable. Our staff then performs his or her function of analyzing the plans and documentation for effective conformance to the state codes, referenced construction standards, and City amendments. 4LEAF’s code review methodology is “The Effective Use of the Codes” reinforced through proprietary and jurisdictional checklists. When complete, the Plan Review Manager overviews the project for quality control purposes and forwards comments or approvals to the client’s predesignated contacts.

Third-Party Plan Review and Inspections
4LEAF can provide third-party plan reviews and inspections to applicants, a process that increases permitting efficiency and saves owners, contractors, developers, and jurisdictions time and money. 4LEAF currently provides similar services for the County of Sonoma, County of Marin, and City of Santa Rosa clients. 4LEAF meets with each Jurisdiction to streamline a process that will best meet the needs of their applicants.

Structural Only Review
Upon request, 4LEAF will perform “structural only” reviews for the City. 4LEAF can communicate directly with the designers via email, in-person meetings, and through our EZPlan Review system. 4LEAF prefers PDF files for “structural only” reviews as they allow several Structural Engineers to review plans together should there be design-related questions. The majority of 4LEAF’s plan review engineers have a design background and work well with project designers.

Off-Site Electronic Plan Review
Digital plan review allows 4LEAF the ability to review, markup and transport plans of any size electronically. We strongly encourage this service for our clients. This process delivers a high degree of cost effectiveness, time efficiency and a “green” and environmentally friendly system. Through our strong focus on utilizing this digital capability, we offer full access to all 4LEAF engineers and plans examiners company-wide, from any of our office locations. A protected online portal will be established to allow property owners, contractors, developers, businesses, designers, and stakeholders to submit plans electronically for review. Access to the online portal will be given to City staff for immediate access to information regarding project status during the review process. 4LEAF has successfully implemented and used Bluebeam for electronic review of files to help eliminate the use of paper and take the plan review workflow to a whole new level. 4LEAF’s offices are equipped with large scale monitors for easy review of plans. Bluebeam Revu combines powerful PDF editing, markup, and collaboration technology with reliable file creation. Bluebeam integrates flawlessly with our Green Line approach for electronic and timely turnarounds resulting in permit issuance within 5-7 business days.

Additional Technologies
Having served more than 400 jurisdictions, 4LEAF and our staff are knowledgeable and have experience working with a variety of different technologies for Electronic Plan Review, Permit Tracking, and Building Inspections. 4LEAF’s experience with tracking technologies includes, but is not limited to:
45 of 251
City of Union City Page 5
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Fire Prevention Services
4LEAF understands that the City is seeking a consultant who is highly experienced in providing commercial and residential fire plan review and inspection services. The City would like to contract with a dependable firm who can conduct external plan reviews and provide inspection services as needed by the City in an effort to provide a timely, efficient, and professional service to the needs of the City. Additional services might include professional personnel such as Fire Marshals, Fire Protection Engineers, Fire Inspectors, Fire Prevention Officers, permit technicians, inhouse/remote fire plans examiners, and other Fire Prevention personnel as needed. 4LEAF is a qualified fire consultant who can provide:
 Complete Fire Prevention Services
 Construction Related Fire Plan Reviews and Inspections  Web-based digital platform for Fire Plan Review Permit Tracking  Fire Prevention Division Staff Augmentation
 Annual Fire Inspections
 Administrative support
Approach
Our Fire team is comprised of experienced Fire Prevention Officers, Fire Inspectors, Fire Investigators, Fire Plans Examiners, Fire Protection Engineers, Fire Marshals, and Fire Chiefs. 4LEAF’s Fire Prevention personnel are professionally licensed, ICC Certified, and/or CSFM Certified and experienced working within a public and private work environment.

Our team can provide complete Fire Prevention services for all types of occupancies and construction types to ensure compliance with all adopted codes, local ordinances and state and federal laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards that pertain to Fire/Life Safety including:
 CA Code of Regulations, Titles 19 & 24
 All NFPA Standards
 Local amendments to the CA Fire Code
 Municipal Codes, Standards, and Policies
 California Health and Safety Code
 National Fire & Building Referenced Standards
4LEAF is a Fire and Life Safety industry leader in Fire Prevention. Our Fire Prevention services include, but are not limited to:

Complete Fire Code New Construction Services:
 Emergency Site Access Compliance
 Fire Flow Water Supply Compliance
 Building Fire and Life Safety Compliance
 Hazardous Materials Code Compliance
 Emergency Responder Radio Communication
System Compliance
 Wildland-Urban Interface Compliance
 Review of Performance-Based Code Compliance
46 of 251
City of Union City Page 6
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
 Fire Suppression, Fire Alarm and Gas
Detection System Compliance
 Hazardous Occupancies, High Piled Storage,
Energy Storage Systems and Plant Processing
and Extraction Compliance
 Cause & Origin Investigation
 Review of Alternative Materials and Methods of
Construction
 New Construction Acceptance Testing and
Inspections
 In-House & Off-Site Plan Review
 Code Adoption
Complete Fire Prevention Division Services:
 Fire Code Operational Permits
 Annual Business Inspections
 Fire Investigations
 Hazardous Materials Inspections
 Wildland-Urban Interface Compliance
 Codes and Standards Development
 Public Education
 Safety Training
 Special Events Permits
Permit Technician Services
4LEAF has a proven track record of providing Permit Technician/Counter staff to Building Divisions and Community Development Departments. 4LEAF’s provided staff shall review, process, record, coordinate construction projects and serve customers at the public counter, providing information and assistance in written and oral form to the public according to departmental procedures and legal requirements. Our staff encompasses the right combination of experience, education, and certifications. 4LEAF prides itself on providing experienced professionals to work with the City and serve the public at the Building Division counter.

Understanding
4LEAF Permit Technician Staff must be experienced and dedicated to serving the public at the Building Department counter. 4LEAF has numerous Permit/Counter Technicians on staff, many who are currently assigned to Building Departments throughout the state. All staff will have the materials, resources, tools, and training required to perform the job, including software applications such as Accela, Bluebeam, etc.. Typical Permit Technician duties include:
• Accepting plans for plan check
• Verification that plans are accurate and complete
• Calculating permit fees
• Explaining ordinances and procedures to owners, contractors, developers, architects, and general public • Assisting with preparation of permit applications
• Receiving plans for Planning and Building permits and route to various agencies (if requested) • Accepting complaints on code violations, process, and record complaints 47 of 251

City of Union City Page 7
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
• Answering phone calls for field and office staff
• Processing inspection requests
• Maintaining files for building permits
• Operating the Building Department’s computerized information system • Inputting a variety of information, including building permits and inspections • Completing related duties and responsibilities as assigned by Building Official and Senior staff members Public Assistance
All building permits and plan reviews will be tracked for expeditious processing, considering legal timelines and response time to the Department’s requests from applicants, outside agencies, and other City departments. At a minimum, project milestone estimates and dates shall be tracked. In addition, the City will be tracking data regarding workload, processing times and associated costs of the Department’s operations. These performance metrics will be used to evaluate 4LEAF’s performance. Some enhanced performances are:
• Questionnaires rating our customer service satisfaction • Report the response time related to the type of call. • Monitor and report the response time of 4LEAF staff.

Turn-Around Times
Building Department Staff Interim Full-Time
Permit Technician < 2 Days < 5 Days
Assistant Permit Technician / Counter Staff < 2 Days < 5 Days Inspection Services
4LEAF has a team of more than 200 ICC Certified Building Inspectors, OSHPD/DSA Inspectors of Record, Fire Personnel, and Construction Inspectors working on various contracts. 4LEAF has a team committed to work throughout California who will remain for the duration of projects to ensure we capture the goals and performance that have made our inspection system successful.

We maintain the largest database of qualified inspectors of varied qualifications. Inspectors vary from current full-time inspection staff, idle staff (temporarily between assignments), and pre-qualified staff which include inspectors who are available subject to client demand. 4LEAF’s inspectors are all ICC Certified and experienced working within a municipal work environment. 4LEAF will provide inspectors with all the necessary tools, equipment, and current code books sufficient to facilitate all required inspections. 4LEAF can provide interim or full-time inspectors same-day or within one business day—simply call, email, or text our assigned Project Manager for an immediate response. Our on-call database is utilized for all our clients for as-needed requests. 48 of 251
City of Union City Page 8
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Periodic Inspection Services  Available Next Day
4LEAF can fulfill inspection requests immediately upon request including same day. 4LEAF has a wealth of local and available inspectors ready to serve the City. In addition, 4LEAF has a proven track record of providing such services to a number of different building departments.

Part-Time Inspection Services  Available Next Day
4LEAF will provide the City with part-time inspectors upon request. 4LEAF can provide part-time staff within 24 hours of request for any duration of time. 4LEAF’s Project Manager will work closely with the department to identify the right personnel and determine the appropriate work schedule.

Full-Time Inspection Services  Available Two Days or Less 4LEAF can provide full-time inspectors upon request. 4LEAF provides this service regularly to many clients throughout Southern California, Northern California, Central Valley, Central Coast, Sacramento Valley, Peninsula/South Bay, East Bay, and North Bay.

Project Specific Inspection Services  Available Two Days or Less 4LEAF is often tasked with providing inspection services for large projects on behalf of municipalities. 4LEAF handles large-scale projects for many of our clients. These projects are developer funded into a separate City account which is distributed to 4LEAF using a separate invoice and contract number. This is particularly helpful to fast paced projects looking for continuous inspection services over a short period of time (i.e. 6 - 36 Months).

Inspection Technology
4LEAF has extensive experience working with various inspection reporting technologies, including elas.™ and GoFormz which 4LEAF used this for all scopes of the Apple 2 Campus (~$8 Billion), and for the Encore Boston Harbor Casino (~$2.6 Billion), San Mateo County Project Development Unit (~$1.1 Billion), and at San Jose State University (~$1 Billion). Our software allows every piece of information collected on a project to be accessible by all staff as every inspection report is stored securely and safely in the cloud. The information can be accessed through a user’s web account where any inspection report can be viewed, and reports can be ran using stored project data. With inspection technology, 4LEAF inspectors are able to leave detailed notes under the inspections and observations box and instantaneously attach pictures to reports to show the items inspected. By means of an iPad, inspectors sign reports using a mobile signature block and attached pictures of the item inspected. 49 of 251
City of Union City Page 9
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
elas.™ Page View
Advanced Technologies Through Elas.™
Our team’s proprietary elas.™ platform is a key tool supporting efficient and accurate field documentation and reporting for this project. elas™ will be used by our team to streamline the management of inspection data, daily reports, plan review documentation, code compliance, and more. elas.™ will integrate seamlessly with City’s required platforms allowing inspection logs, plan review comments, and CBO certifications to be efficiently shared and tracked. This ensures that all team members across the City are working from the same, up-to-date information set.
elas.™ offers a secure Client Portal for designated City personnel, allowing 24/7 access to project records and real-time updates. This transparency supports timely communication and coordinates action across the full project team. elas.™ enhances collaboration, improves data accuracy, and ensures that all documentation complies with the City’s digital and project-specific requirements.

FEATURES OF ELAS�
» Efficie nt Dis patch Coordination
» Cus tomized and
Compre he ns ive
Re port Pre paration
» Ability to Download
Re ports
» Secure Web- Bas e d Docume nt
Manage me nt
» Bille d-to-Budge t Re ports
» Summary Invoice s
50 of 251
City of Union City Page 10
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Code Enforcement Services
Our Code Enforcement personnel are certified through the International Code Council, CACEO, and various training programs offered through accredited institutions. In addition, most of our personnel hold a PC832, ICC Property Maintenance and Housing Inspector, and/or CACEO. 4LEAF staff have experience in collaborating with property owners and other responsible parties to bring properties into compliance with regulatory standards. Our team is entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring adherence to local, state, and federal laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations pertaining to various aspects of community development and public safety. Our Code Enforcement team possesses a diverse skill set and expertise covering a wide area, including building construction, zoning, land use, property maintenance, health and sanitation, environmental protection, and public nuisances. Our Code Enforcement team is adept at utilizing various procedural mechanisms, such as issuing administrative citations, investigating potential violations and ensuring prompt resolution while upholding legal integrity. At 4LEAF, our primary goal for our code enforcement team is to promote and maintain the health, safety, and welfare of residents and visitors within the municipality or jurisdiction we serve. 4LEAF Code Enforcement Officers have experience in writing criminal citations and in working with legal counsel to assist in the successful prosecution of Code Enforcement cases either in criminal or civil courts when necessary. We focus on nearly every area of Code Enforcement including, but not limited to, the following categories detailed below.

Scope of Services & Areas of Enforcement
Standard Operating Procedures
4LEAF’s Code Enforcement Directors have an extensive history with Cities and Counties in preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s) to ensure consistency while performing code enforcement duties. This will provide guidelines for Code Enforcement personnel to implement and achieve voluntary compliance. These SOP’s are specific to each community’s needs and we help establish a uniform set of guidelines for consistency and efficiency. Some of these areas include:
 Training guidelines for new Code Enforcement Officers  Safety guidelines (including Officer Safety Procedures or compliance with SB246)  Hearings
 Testimony
Blight Enforcement
Our team works to identify and enforce state and local laws pertaining to the maintenance of private property.

Through field contact with tenants and property owners, our team works efficiently in providing guidance to address blighted conditions such as overgrown weeds, trash, debris, and graffiti. 51 of 251
City of Union City Page 11
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Classroom Training with CEUs
You can often find members of 4LEAF training nationally for organizations such as the International Code Council (ICC), American Association of Code Enforcement (AACE), California Association of Code Enforcement Officers (CACEO), and other nationally recognized affiliations of these chapters. 4LEAF’s training leads include Pete Roque, Kenneth Eckman, and Alejandra Molina. Our instructors are nationally accredited and offer Continuing Education Credits (CEUs).

Our trainers currently cover topics such as:
o 10 Most Common Complaints
o Accessible Parking
o ADU Legislation
o Agency Promotion Community Relations
o Banner and Sign Enforcement
o Basic Ethics
o Basic Ethics and Inspections
o Basic Ethics, Authority, and Inspections
o Basic Inspection Protocol
o Basic Report Writing
o Basic Residential Construction
o Blueprint Reading
o Building And Safety Presentation
o Building Blocks for Code Enforcement
Officer Success
o Building Code
o Building Inspections and Code Enforcement
– A Powerful Duo
o Case Documentation
o Case Management from Start to Finish
o Code Enforcement 101
o Code Enforcement Culture
o Courtroom Testimony and Demeanor
o Dealing With Difficult People
o Effective Communications – Bridging the
Gap with External and Internal Customers
o Ensuring Short-Term Rental Reg.

Compliance
o Essentials for Short-Term Rental
Enforcement
o Ethics
o Hoarding
o Individual Awareness and Preparation
o Inspection Protocol
o Interior Inspections
o Intermediate Communications
o Interview And Interrogation
o Interview And Report Writing
o Investigative Report Writing
o IPMC 2021 or 2018 Exam Prep
o IPMC 2021 Overview
o Landlord Tenant Disputes
o Legal Aspects
o Marketing Your Code Enforcement
o Mobile Vending
o Mold, Lead, Asbestos, & Vectors
Enforcement
o Multi-Agency Task Forces
o Officer Safety – Drug Awareness for the
Code Enforcement Officer
o Officer Safety – Encountering Mental Illness
in the field of Code Enforcement (Self-Care)
o Officer Safety – Field Inspection Protocols
for the Code Enforcement Officer
o Officer Safety – Gang Awareness for the
Code Enforcement Officer
o Officer Safety – Hazardous Building Safety
for the Code Enforcement Officer
o Planning And Zoning Basics
o Property Maintenance
52 of 251
City of Union City Page 12
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Community Outreach
4LEAF will review current outreach and engagement initiatives and make appropriate recommendations to the City. Items typically reviewed include:
o Opportunities for involvement in community events
o Creation of pamphlets and marketing material
o Social media engagement
o News media outlets
o Municipal Code Enforcement web page
o Review of frequently asked questions
Department Assessments
4LEAF is working with many Community Development Departments to provide assessments of their code units reviewing closely staffing levels, Standard Operating Procedures (including branding/rebranding, target issues, prioritization of existing Code Enforcement cases, community engagement strategies, written materials such as compliance notices, postings and door hangers, data entry, inspection response time management, and training programs. Additionally, 4LEAF provides in-house assessments and regular meetings with directors and municipal stakeholders for plan implementation and execution.

Hearing Officers
4LEAF has Hearing Officers available for contracted municipalities. Our seasoned officers are trained to understand the existing Municipal Code as well as other adopted codes and make a knowledgeable determination regarding the validity of a violation. Results may include the issuance of fines or granting additional time for compliance for respondents with unusual hardships.

Inspections
4LEAF can provide certified and qualified staff to perform inspections in a lawful manner that respects the reasonable expectations of privacy and security of residents and their properties. Inspections conducted will determine if conditions on the properties are compliant with applicable sections of the current editions of the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC), Municipal Code, Zoning Code, California Health and Safety Codes, Uniform Housing Code, Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Building, CA Residential Code, CA Building Code, and trade codes.

Upon assignment, 4LEAF’s Code Enforcement staff will be ready to respond and provide compliance solutions to code cases, new and existing, with minimal impact to current processes. 4LEAF Code Enforcement Inspectors are qualified to do the following:
o Perform inspections for violations of Building Codes and Ordinances as adopted by the municipality. o Research properties for prior approvals, permits, and general information relating to violations. o Investigate and take necessary action when a violation of municipal codes exists. 53 of 251
City of Union City Page 13
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
o Consult with the City Council as required, when requested by the Code Enforcement Manager/Director, and when escalated enforcement may be required.
o Comply with the City’s procedures for reporting inspection results and deficiencies. o Use City inspection correction forms.
o Complete necessary digital entries that capture site inspection results, case status communications and any documentation of notices provided to responsible parties and stakeholders. o Conduct follow-up inspections as needed.
o Notify the responsible parties of other agency approvals prior to closing a Code Enforcement action. o Maintain records as needed for the efficient and effective operation of the City. o Meet with members of the public and municipal staff on a daily basis as needed.

Short-Term Rental Programs
One of the fastest-growing programs within Code Enforcement Divisions is short-term rentals. 4LEAF assists with compliance with municipal short-term rental ordinances that require property owners to adhere to several rules, including limiting the number of daytime and overnight guests, prohibiting events and amplified sound, and posting specific rules and emergency information, among others. Short-term rentals are presenting challenges within our communities. While these rentals offer unique opportunities for travelers and hosts, they have also brought forth various concerns that warrant immediate attention. Housing availability, neighborhood dynamics, and safety considerations have raised valid apprehensions among residents. 4LEAF understands these issues and is pleased to present a comprehensive scope of services designed to regulate short-term rentals effectively, fostering a harmonious coexistence for all stakeholders involved. Our proposed solution encompasses meticulous research, the development of fair regulations, stringent compliance inspections, and a robust enforcement system to address illegal postings and operations. With these measures in place, we can resolve the prevailing issues and create a sustainable short-term rental ecosystem that benefits the entire community. We look forward to collaborating with you all in implementing this solution and achieving a positive and lasting impact on our neighborhoods. These are scopes of services that we provide, including but not limited to:

1. Research and Analysis: Conducting a thorough study of the local short-term rental market is crucial to understanding the current landscape and potential impact on the community. This data-driven approach enables your jurisdiction to make informed decisions and design effective regulations tailored to your specific needs.

2. Developing Regulations and Policies: Developing clear and well-defined regulations is essential for creating a level playing field for all short-term rental operators. These policies help establish guidelines, standards, and boundaries that ensure the industry operates responsibly, benefiting both residents and hosts alike.

3. Licensing and Registration: Implementing a licensing and registration system ensures that only eligible and responsible operators are allowed to offer short-term rentals. This process helps your jurisdiction track and communicate with operators, making it easier to enforce regulations and ensure compliance with safety and tax requirements.
54 of 251
City of Union City Page 14
Scope of Services December 17, 2025

4. Compliance Inspections: Regular compliance inspections are vital to guarantee the safety and quality of shortterm rental properties. By verifying adherence to regulations, your jurisdiction can maintain community safety, prevent potential hazards, and protect the rights of both guests and neighbors.

5. Enforcement and Penalties: A robust enforcement mechanism, including penalties for non-compliant operators, serves as a deterrent against illegal or irresponsible practices. By imposing consequences for violations, authorities can discourage unlawful behavior and encourage operators to adhere to the established regulations.

6. Data Monitoring and Reporting: Implementing or ensuring that proper documentation is completed is standard operating procedure for 4LEAF. A proper data monitoring system provides insights into the shortterm rental market's impact on housing and the local economy. It enables evidence-based decision-making, helping your jurisdiction adjust regulations if necessary and fostering transparency in the regulatory process.

7. Public Awareness and Education: Public awareness campaigns educate both short-term rental operators and residents about their respective rights and responsibilities. By promoting best practices and addressing concerns, these campaigns foster a sense of community understanding and cooperation, reducing potential conflicts.

8. Collaborative Partnerships: Partnering with short-term rental platforms and law enforcement agencies fosters cooperation and facilitates compliance. Data sharing and joint efforts between these stakeholders help streamline the enforcement process and address challenges more effectively.

9. Complaint Resolution: a complaint resolution empowers residents to report issues and complaints related to short-term rentals. Swift and fair resolution of complaints helps maintain harmony within the community and ensures that any problems are addressed promptly.

10. Periodic Review: Regularly reviewing and updating regulations allows your jurisdiction to keep pace with changes in the short-term rental industry and adapt to new challenges or opportunities. This flexibility ensures that the regulatory framework remains relevant and effective in achieving its intended goals.

Lead Abatement
Although lead-based legislation has been around since the 1950s, nationwide regulation was not enforced until 1971 with the introduced of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (LBPPPA), which prohibited the use of leadbased paint in residential structures constructed or rehabilitated by the Federal government or with Federal assistance. In 1973, an amendment to the LBPPPA stated that lead-based paint should be removed from pre-1950 housing and structures. Our Code Enforcement team follows the requirements set forth by the State of California to ensure proper lead safe practices are taking place in removal of lead-based paint to protect citizens from exposure.

Additionally, our team participated at the National Healthy Homes Conference in 2022 in Baltimore, MD, where we spoke on the importance of Code Enforcement for Lead Paint Abatement Programs to safeguard communities. 55 of 251
City of Union City Page 15
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Massage Parlor Enforcement
This scope can often be utilized for undercover stings with partnering agencies for businesses that not only violate criminal laws but also building code violations, licensing requirements, and potential massage parlor ordinances in the City. Early detection is vital in these cases and steps include background checks and other reasonable means of identification and clearances. Our team has championed programs specializing in identifying and mitigating illegal actions in massage parlors.

Parking Enforcement
4LEAF has the capabilities of providing parking enforcement. This includes:
o Enforcement of state and municipal parking regulations. o Removal of abandoned and nuisance vehicles from the public right-of-way. o Issuance of parking citations and review of contested citations.

Policy Review
4LEAF shall review and read current policies and procedures and define policy clearly to set the tone for your municipality’s Code Enforcement Program. A clear policy communicates defined expectations to stakeholders whether it’s how they handle complaints, how Code Enforcement Officers conduct compliance reviews, or any other aspect that the municipality needs to have communicated and consistently followed. 4LEAF will develop a well-defined user-friendly format.

Program Analysis
4LEAF understands that Code Enforcement is an essential part of a community’s public health and safety, providing a regulatory mechanism to ensure the public’s overall wellbeing. Addressing the community’s concerns in a timely and efficient manner is paramount to a successful Code Enforcement Program. 4LEAF personnel will perform the following:
o Conduct investigative inspections of unpermitted activities. o Create standard operating procedures, if required.
o Conduct review of all administrative/misdemeanor citations. o Provide guidance for resolution of high case load along commercial corridors. o Assist with complex code enforcement cases.
o Provide guidance for resolution of existing cases.
o Provide in-house and/or field training of traditional Code Enforcement protocols. o Create an outreach plan to address and deter unpermitted vending/commercial corridor violations.

Program Development
4LEAF project managers have experience in working collaboratively with clients to further develop and enhance their Code Enforcement Program when requested. Our project managers are currently working with local jurisdictions to revise and strengthen Code Enforcement Programs to gain voluntary compliance, provide resident education, and effectively communicate with the public. 4LEAF staff takes an approach in recommending, implementing, and executing program assessments, creation of policies and procedures, creation of training manuals for new hires, providing educational materials for the public, providing staff with up-to-date training, teaching current Code Enforcement staff options for compliance using adopted ordinances, and providing 56 of 251
City of Union City Page 16
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
recommendations to cases that may require specialized expertise that may be sensitive in nature. 4LEAF staff also has designated staff tracking recent legislation to ensure the municipality follows state regulations and clients are aware of upcoming legislation that may affect their Code Enforcement Program.

Project-Specific Assignments
Our Code Enforcement Directors are often brought on board by municipalities to provide consulting for longstanding cases that need a fresh set of eyes and assessment. The Code Enforcement team at 4LEAF will lend their considerable expertise in bringing those difficult cases into compliance. We will review your most challenging cases, assess the work done to date, and confer with the Municipal Code and your department's Standard Operating Procedures. Once our analysis is complete, 4LEAF will provide you with a detailed report of our findings and specific step-by-step strategies to get those cases off the active roster. 4LEAF personnel will be available to speak with stakeholders such as Department Heads, Council, and other elected officials. If necessary, we can also provide Expert Witness Testimony.

Rental Housing Enforcement
Our team will assist with the inspection of residential rental properties on a routine and comprehensive basis to assure the overall quality of the unit meets the requirements of the Health and Safety Code and property maintenance guidelines. This includes educating property owners, property managers, and tenants about those requirements.

Review and Develop SOPs
4LEAF routinely works with Code Enforcement Divisions to review the current Standard Operating Procedures and provide suggestions for enhancing SOPs. Our staff can also help implement and train the existing municipal personnel in these changes. Currently, we are providing these services for California municipalities such as the cities of Escondido, Del Mar, and San Diego.

Staff Augmentation (After-Hours / On-Call Officers)
4LEAF specializes in providing personnel to municipalities on a part-time or full-time basis. At your request, our staff arrives at your door with training opportunities, study materials, company phones, and energy- saving fleet vehicles. When necessary, 4LEAF is capable of providing Code Enforcement staff outside of normal business hours to improve response times, address code violations, and improve response times and maintain public space integrity. 4LEAF’s Code Enforcement Staff Augmentation personnel categories include:
o Department Director
o Department Manager
o Code Enforcement Manager and Training Officer
o Senior Code Enforcement Officer
o Code Enforcement Officer I & II
o Code Enforcement Coordinator/Technician
o Hearing Officer
57 of 251
City of Union City Page 17
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Stormwater Enforcement
4LEAF provides Stormwater Enforcement. This includes the visual inspection of infrastructure dedicated to the management of rainwater. Violations would include having inadequate erosion/sediment controls for property, failing to conduct/document inspections, illegal dumping, overgrowth of vegetation, and flooding.

Substandard Housing
One of the major areas of code enforcement throughout the U.S. is the inspection of Substandard Housing. 4LEAF Code Enforcement Officers routinely inspect and report any violations to housing codes including substandard and uninhabitable conditions, un-permitted construction, unlawfully created units or spaces, inadequate or non-existent heating, accumulated trash and debris, lack of utilities, property maintenance, mold, and rodent/insect infestations.

Tobacco Enforcement
These programs ensure that retailers are properly licensed/permitted for the sale of tobacco and such establishments are posting proper notification such as STAKE Act stickers at each point of sale. In addition, we can assist in compliance with work-place smoking and vaping prohibitions.

Vendor Enforcement
In many areas across California, unlawful street vending has become a pressing concern. These vendors, offering a wide variety of products, often operate without adhering to established regulations, leading to challenges such as littering, public right of way obstructions, and unfair competition with authorized businesses. While California has taken commendable steps, such as the introduction of Senate Bill 946 and Senate Bill 972, both of which are designed to regulate and decriminalize certain aspects of street vending, there remains much work to do. Many vendors, driven more by economic desperation than defiance, continue to bypass these regulations, resulting in a surge of potentially unsafe vending operations, many of which are food vendors. This not only jeopardizes public health but also diminishes the state's regulatory efforts.
4LEAF is an experienced solution-oriented firm that recognizes the complexities of this issue. Beyond mere law enforcement, the 4LEAF team understands the socioeconomic intricacies driving vendors towards this livelihood. Our tailored programs are designed to address the root causes, ensuring vendors have pathways to legitimate operations while helping jurisdictions maintain public safety and order.

Through a partnership with the City, 4LEAF is poised to offer a comprehensive strategy and service that not only aligns with state regulations but also provides sustainable solutions for the challenges of unlawful street vending. 58 of 251
City of Union City Page 18
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
Planning Services
Our Planners possess the technical writing and report preparation abilities needed to convey the greatest detail in a manner that is easy to understand with solid recommendations of findings rooted in the plans, policies, and codes that reinforce the City’s vision. We are dedicated to understanding the vision of a community and rigorously working towards that vision. We utilize application checklists as the foundation of our review and translate policies and regulations as they apply to planning development applications. We transpose our findings into informative, concise, and simple to understand staff reports and environmental compliance documentation.

These endeavors cannot be accomplished in a vacuum and our staff are well‐versed in project management and will work diligently with other City departments and agencies, including regional agencies, to ensure that the highest levels of review and feedback are achieved.
4LEAF Planners will arrive on-site with a positive attitude and will make every attempt to move projects forward to achieve successful outcomes. We are creative in our approach and can develop alternative methods to achieve the best outcome for the communities, agencies, and applicants. The Planning Division at 4LEAF is responsible for integrating staff into Local and State jurisdictions where we are routinely called upon to supplement vacancies and staff shortages. We also provide staff augmentation services when projects require focused processing and management of a variety of land use applications for compliance with land development codes and general, adopted area, and specific plans.

Current Planning (Counter Intake and Project Review)
4LEAF’s Planning duties include ensuring the project team quickly and effectively becomes familiar with City regulations. This approach minimizes the time needed for our Planning Team to become effective answering questions at the Planning Counter regarding Planning application and Environmental Review requirements as well as conducting Project review. This approach ensures cost and time effectiveness of our provision of services to the City and is a foundational principal in our Planning Team’s approach as detailed below.

Long-Range Planning
Our long-range Planning team helps cities draft plans, policies, and programs designed to guide their physical design and development. We have over 30 years of experience preparing housing elements, general plans, specific and area plans, and environmental documents in various types of ecological, land use, and socioeconomic settings. Our mission is to provide our clients with high-level professional expertise, leveraging our local experience and diverse team of experts to create a plan that is contextual and implementable, and meets the requirements and needs of the community. Our approach to every project is centered upon the design and development of innovative solutions that respond to our clients’ specific needs in a cost-effective manner.

Housing and Related Planning
In addition to providing on-call planning services, 4LEAF is currently managing the Napa-Sonoma Collaborative, an ABAG subregional planning effort for the 16 jurisdictions of Napa and Sonoma Counties. Our collaborative work addresses the many planning challenges facing the region including housing, equity, infill, and VMT 59 of 251
City of Union City Page 19
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
reduction. As a part of this work, 4LEAF staff provide professional planning TA (Technical Assistance) on an asneeded basis to each of our 16 jurisdiction members. 4LEAF has also prepared 6th Cycle Housing Elements both locally (County of Sonoma and the cities of Cotati, Cloverdale, Healdsburg, Rohnert Park, and Sebastopol) and across the state (County of Lassen 7th Cycle and the cities of Santa Clarita, Escalon, and Gonzales).

Environmental Review Services
Our team evaluates the General Plan, Zoning, Subdivision regulations consistency and environmental impacts of private and public development proposals and coordinates with other divisions to ensure that standards for Public Works engineering for infrastructure systems and building & safety requirements are appropriately addressed with new development.

Project Application Processing
The Counter Planning Technician is an important and vital member of the Planning Team. They will be the first person most applicants and public will encounter at the Planning Counter and will be professional, informative, and able to be appropriately empathetic with applicants in the regulatory compliance context. They will be responsible for application intake and project file creation, establishing the project review calendar, including completeness review pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code § 65920 et seq.).

Our team will use the existing submittal forms and advise the City potential need for updates to keep pace with the many recent changes to Planning and Housing regulations. The Planning Technician will work with the City and 4LEAF management and planners to ensure staff assignments are confirmed for all Planning applications received. Our Planning Technician has confidence in coming up to speed quickly and providing information over the phone, via email, and assisting with project updates to the City website. Being diligent to, taking in and reviewing project applications for applicant notification of commencement of environmental review or a need for additional materials to be submitted for the City to determine the application complete.

The 4LEAF Planning and Environmental team is composed of experienced Supervisors and Senior level project managers, Associate and Assistant Planners, and Planning Technicians. Our Project Case Planners are assigned cases by the Supervisor or Project Manager in coordination with City staff. Project review assignments will be made to our Planning team depending on the complexity of the project and the applicable experience of the Planner assigned. Our project management approach serves to maximize team ability to process applications effectively from compliance and environmental review to design review and decision-maker hearings. This approach also ensures that our Planning Team is assigned the appropriate number of projects suited to their experience and qualifications, thereby realizing cost and time effective management as part of our approach.

Planning Review Process
Our Planning team members will come to the City informed by our prior experience processing a range of project types: from mixed use commercial and residential projects, hotels, commercial, industrial uses, energy permitting and environmental. Our housing project review experience includes new, rebuilding, and temporary 60 of 251
City of Union City Page 20
Scope of Services December 17, 2025
housing. Our planners understand compliance with a range of new legislation adopted by the Governor since 2017 aimed at addressing the statewide housing shortage at the local level. Our Planning Team provides project review such as:
• 4LEAF will conduct preliminary review of applications during the 30-days of application completeness review pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Sections 65920, et seq.). • Provide responses to public inquiries via telephone, email, mail or in person regarding applications. • Applicants will be notified of any additional information or studies required to ensure a complete project description is provided prior to the application being deemed complete. • During initiation of project level environmental review, outreach will be conducted to adjacent local and responsible agencies for air quality, water quality, transportation planning, and tribal consultation as warranted.
• Peer review services will be provided by qualified 4LEAF staff and entail reviewing applicant prepared technical studies and tribal consultation letters submitted with project applications when needed.

Depending on the environmental review scope, 4LEAF will partner with qualified experts to provide as needed technical studies.
• 4LEAF will provide ministerial review and usher entitlement reviews through discretionary review by decision makers. This review assesses project applications for the appropriate permits and plan amendments for compliance with the City’s General Plan and Housing Element, the Zoning Code, State housing requirements, the Subdivision Map Act, Design Guidelines, and applicable objective design guidelines or specific plan requirements.
• Confer with and provide information to property owners, contractors, developers, engineers, architects, and the public regarding conformance to standards, plans, specifications, and codes. • Prepare staff reports, resolutions, ordinances, and conditions of approval and give oral presentations to the Planning Commission, City Council, and various committees and commissions, and attend evening meetings as required.
• Analyze data for economic, social, environmental, and physical factors affecting land use and prepare environmental documents for public review and adoption. • Perform project management duties including the maintenance of the development database and tracking of deadlines, application submittal requirements, and workload while maintaining quality work products, meeting timelines, and staying within budget. • Process and review City permits, Plan Checks, Zoning Clearances, Master Sign Programs, Administrative Permits, Minor and Major Use Permits, Design and Site Review, Variances, Tree Removal Permits, Tentative Maps, Zoning Map Amendments, and General Plan and Development Code Amendments. 61 of 251
City of Union City
FY2025-2026 Fee Schedule

December 17, 2025

HOURLY RATES
FY2025-2026 FEE SCHEDULE & BASIS OF CHARGES

FOR THE CITY OF UNION CITY
All Rates are Subject to Basis of Charges

PLAN REVIEW COST STRUCTURE NOTES
Plan Review Percentage: 65%
(Inclusive of all disciplines except Fire and Civil which are billed on an hourly basis)
Hourly Plan Review: $149 Non-Structural Review
$165 Structural Review
Fee includes:
 Initial review and two (2) rechecks. Hourly
charges apply after three (3) or more
rechecks.
 Shipping, courier, and electronic service.

Building
Chief Building Official .......................................................................................................................... $175/hour Structural Plan Review Engineer ......................................................................................................... $165/hour Non-Structural Plans Examiner ........................................................................................................... $149/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Inspector ....................................................................................... $180/hour Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Plans Examiner .............................................................................. $180/hour Senior Combination Building Inspector (Building Inspector III) .......................................................... $139/hour Commercial Building Inspector (Building Inspector II) ........................................................................ $124/hour Residential Building Inspector (Building Inspector I) .......................................................................... $108/hour Permit Manager .................................................................................................................................. $118/hour Senior Permit Technician .................................................................................................................... $101/hour Permit Technician ............................................................................................................................... $89/hour Clerk/Administrator ............................................................................................................................ $72/hour Supervising Inspector of Record ......................................................................................................... $174/hour Inspector of Record............................................................................................................................. $153/hour DSA Class 1 / OSHPD A Inspector ........................................................................................................ $180/hour DSA Class 2 / OSHPD B Inspector ........................................................................................................ $149/hour DSA Class 3 / OSHPD C Inspector ........................................................................................................ $106/hour Code Enforcement
Code Enforcement Director ................................................................................................................ $201/hour Code Enforcement Manager ............................................................................................................... $165/hour Senior Code Enforcement Officer ....................................................................................................... $134/hour Code Enforcement Officer II ................................................................................................................ $129/hour Code Enforcement Officer I ................................................................................................................. $113/hour Code Enforcement Officer .................................................................................................................. $108/hour Housing Inspector ............................................................................................................................... $108/hour Hearing Officer .................................................................................................................................... $155/hour 62 of 251
City of Union City
FY2025-2026 Fee Schedule

December 17, 2025
Principal-in-Charge...............................................................................................................................$280/hour Hourly overtime charge per inspector................................................................................................1.5 x hourly rate Mileage (for inspections performed within the City)..........................................................................IRS Rate + 20% Fire
Fire Protection Engineer (FPE) ............................................................................................................$237/hour Fire Prevention Officer........................................................................................................................$160/hour Fire Plans Examiner.............................................................................................................................$170/hour Fire Inspector II...................................................................................................................................$139/hour Fire Inspector I....................................................................................................................................$124/hour Planning
Housing Policy Director.......................................................................................................................$232/hour Planning Director................................................................................................................................$211/hour Principal/Planning Manager ...............................................................................................................$180/hour Senior Planner.....................................................................................................................................$165/hour Associate Planner................................................................................................................................$144/hour Assistant Planner ................................................................................................................................$118/hour Planning Technician ............................................................................................................................$101/hour Project Management
Project Manager .................................................................................................................................$196/hour Principal-in-Charge..............................................................................................................................$280/hour Engineering, Public Works Inspection, & Construction Management (Prevailing Wage) Civil Plan Review (Grading, Improvement Plans)...............................................................................$180/hour Traffic Engineer...................................................................................................................................$230/hour Construction Manager........................................................................................................................$162/hour Public Works Inspector (Regular Time)...............................................................................................$153/hour Public Works Inspector Apprentice.....................................................................................................$99/hour Public Works Plans Examiner..............................................................................................................$145/hour

BASIS OF CHARGES
Rates are inclusive of “tools of the trade” such as forms, telephones, and consumables. • All invoicing will be submitted monthly.
• All invoices will receive a 3% administrative fee.
• Staff Augmentation work (excluding plan review) is subject to 4-hour minimum charges unless stated otherwise. Services billed in 4-hour increments.
• Most plan reviews will be done in 10 business days or less and 5 business days or less for re-checks. This is not inclusive of holidays or the day of the pick-up of plans. • Expedited reviews will be billed at 1.5x the plan review fee listed in the fee schedule. Return time will be within seven (7) days of receipt of the plans from the City. • Plan review of deferred submittals & revisions will be billed at the hourly rates listed. 63 of 251
City of Union City
FY2025-2026 Fee Schedule

December 17, 2025
• All plan review services are billed on a percentage basis and includes the initial review and 2 rechecks. - Plan reviews will be billed on an hourly basis only after the initial review and 2 rechecks unless otherwise agreed upon on a case-by-case basis.
- Fire and Civil Reviews are billed on an hourly basis and are not included in our plan review percentage.
• These above rates reflect the FY2025-2027 contract period. • Overtime and Premium time will be charged as follows:
- Regular time (work begun after 5AM or before 4PM) 1 x hourly rate - Nighttime (work begun after 4PM or before 5AM) 1.125 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8-hour M-F or Saturdays) 1.5 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sat or 1st 8-hour Sun) 2 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sun or Holidays) 3 x hourly rate • Overtime will only be billed with prior authorization of the Director or other designated City personnel. • All work with less than 8 hours rest between shifts will be charged the appropriate overtime rate. • Cancellation of Building Inspection services within 24 hours of scheduled inspection will incur a minimum 2-hour charge.
• Mileage driven during the course of Inspections will be charged at cost plus 20%. • Payment due on receipt. All payments over 30 days will be assessed a 1.5% interest charge. • Client shall pay attorneys’ fees, or other costs incurred in collecting delinquent amounts. • Client agrees that 4LEAF’s liability will be limited to the value ofservices provided. • In accordance with California’s Meal Break and Rest Break Law requirements, Client will be billed one (1) additional hour per day at the regular rate for each missed meal or rest break due to Client-directed tasks or requirements. Client should allow 4LEAF’s non-exempt, hourly employees the opportunity to take their entitled rest and meal breaks during each work shift.

BASIS OF CHARGES – PREVAILING WAGE • Rates shown assume the projects will require compliance with California Prevailing Wage rate requirements and assumes the Client will be filing a PWC-100 Form to the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) for the projects.
• Rates for prevailing wage categories are subject to annual escalations in accordance with the bi-annual wage determinations from the California DIR.
• Per the new requirements being enforced under SB 854 and because it is assumed that a PWC-100 Form will be filed by the Client to the CA DIR for each project, 4LEAF is required to notify an authorized Apprenticeship Committee through submittal of a DAS-140 form. We are then required to make an official request to an authorized Apprenticeship Committee for an apprentice by submitting a DAS-142 form. We are not assured the apprenticeship committee will be able to provide a suitable/qualified apprentice for the project. Per the apprenticeship requirements, the hours worked by the apprentice must be in a ratio of 1:5 for apprentice to journeyman hours. 4LEAF will not know the labor classification of the Public Works Apprentice until an Apprentice is dispatched to the site; therefore, the rates for the five Periods listed under the California DIR’s Wage determination for Building Construction Inspector were used to determine the range of hourly rates for Public Works Inspector Apprentice. • Pre-approved Overtime and Premium hours for labor categories subject to Prevailing Wage requirements will be charged per the following:
64 of 251
City of Union City
FY2025-2026 Fee Schedule

December 17, 2025
- Nighttime (work begun after 4PM or before 5AM) 1.125 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8-hour M-F or Saturdays) 1.35 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sat or 1st 8-hour Sun) 1.85 x hourly rate - Overtime (over 8 hours Sun or Holidays) 2.35 x hourly rate • All invoicing will be submitted monthly.
• All work with less than 8 hours rest between shifts will be charged the appropriate overtime rate. • Project-related mileage for inspections will be billed at the allowable IRS Rate. • Payment due on receipt. All payments over 30 days will be assessed a 1.5% interest charge. • Client shall pay attorneys’ fees, or other costs incurred in collecting delinquent amounts. • Client agrees that 4LEAF’s liability will be limited to the value ofservices provided. • In accordance with California’s Meal Break and Rest Break Law requirements, Client will be billed one (1) additional hour per day at the regular rate for each missed meal or rest break due to Client-directed tasks or requirements. Client should allow 4LEAF’s non-exempt, hourly employees the opportunity to take their entitled rest and meal breaks during each work shift. 65 of 251
1 DATE: 2/10/2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Carmela Campbell, Economic & Community Development Director RE: City Council Agenda Item 4.3 – 4Leaf Consulting Services Agreement Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers,
This memorandum is to formally request the City Council consider moving the agenda item 4.3 regarding the 4Leaf consulting services agreement, from the February 10, 2026 agenda on consent, to the February 24, 2026 agenda on consent.

Respectfully Submitted,
Carmela Campbell,
Economic and Community Development Director
66 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 2 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.4
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Rush Truck Center to Purchase One (1) Replacement Vehicle, in the Amount of $76,000

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Rush Truck Center to purchase a recommended replacement vehicle, in the amount of $76,000. Following the purchase of the new truck, the existing vehicle will be taken out of service, declared surplus, and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the City’s Municipal Code Section 2.32.130.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

Goal D, Strategy 9 Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Transition the UC Transit fleet to zero emissions.

BACKGROUND
As part of the City’s ongoing vehicle replacement program, staff have determined that the vehicle listed in the table below is no longer serviceable for municipal use.

NO. UNIT YEAR MAKE MODEL MILEAGE AGE VIN
1 505 2007 FORD F-150 127,229 19 1FTPF12587KC47244
Given the vehicle's age and mileage, continued use in the City’s fleet is not recommended, as it creates reliability issues and higher maintenance costs, including challenges in sourcing suitable replacement parts.
67 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.4
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 2 February 10, 2026

DISCUSSION
The following vehicle is recommended to be replaced:
1) Unit 505, a 2007 Ford F-150 Truck, used by Public Works staff -- recommend replacement with a new 2025 Ford F-250 Truck.

The Public Works Fleet Division received a proposal for a new 2025 Ford F-250 Truck from Rush Truck Center of Ceres, California, in the amount of $76,000. Vehicle purchases are available under a Sourcewell cooperative agreement, government purchasing contract #032824-RTG. Sourcewell ensures competitive pricing through a national request-for-proposals process that leverages the purchasing power of member agencies and streamlines procurement, enabling the City to purchase discounted vehicles through Sourcewell-awarded contracts.

The vehicle is in stock and delivery is expected within a month of purchase.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for the purchase order for the recommended replacement vehicle, in the amount of $76,000, are available in the Fleet Replacement Fund budget (Account Number 613- 35004-57140).

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Rush Truck Center to purchase a recommended replacement vehicle, in the amount of $76,000.

Prepared by: Juan Dominguez, Fleet Supervisor
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Draft Resolution
68 of 251
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT
WITH RUSH TRUCK CENTER TO PURCHASE ONE (1) REPLACEMENT
VEHICLE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $76,000
WHEREAS, one (1) vehicle in the Public Works Department is due for replacement due to its age and mileage; and
WHEREAS, the vehicle purchase will be under a Sourcewell cooperative agreement government purchasing contract through Rush Truck Center, Ceres, in the amount of $76,000; and
WHEREAS, the vehicle to be replaced has been presented to the City Council and will be declared surplus upon purchasing the replacement vehicles, with the surplus vehicle being disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the City’s Municipal Code Section 2.32.130
; and
WHEREAS, proceeds from the disposal of the surplus vehicle, if any, will be credited to the Fleet Equipment Acquisition Fund (Fund 613-35004).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a contract with Rush Truck Center to purchase a recommended replacement vehicle, 2025 Ford F-250 truck, in the amount of $76,000; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby declares the vehicle being replaced be taken out of service, declared surplus and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the City’s Municipal Code Section

2.32.130, and that the proceeds from its disposal, if any, will be credited to the Fleet Equipment Acquisition Fund (Fund 613-35004).

NO. UNIT YEAR MAKE MODEL MILEAGE AGE VIN
1 505 2007 FORD F-150 127,229 19 1FTPF12587KC47244
69 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Approve Contract with Rush Truck Center for Replacement Vehicle

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
70 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.5
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Accepting $23,000 from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air, Administered by the Alameda County Transportation Commission, Amending the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund Budget, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Project Funding Agreement for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard, City Project No. 25-55

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution accepting $23,000 from the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA), administered by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), amending the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund Budget, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard, City Project No. 25-55.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

Goal D, Strategy 9 Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Transition the UC Transit fleet to zero emissions.

BACKGROUND
The Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) Update 2021 identified Arizona Street as a strategic corridor for bicycle infrastructure improvements. Specifically, the entire stretch of street was identified for upgrades, striping, and signage to designate it as a safe alternative for bicyclists of all ages and abilities.

Alameda CTC administers funding programs for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of the 2000 Measure B, 2010 Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), 2014 Measure BB, Congestion Management Agency 71 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.5
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 February 10, 2026 Transportation Improvement Program (CMA-TIP), and Transportation Fund for Clean Air Programs (TFCA).

On June 13, 2025, Alameda CTC released the Call for Projects for the FY 2025-2026 Transportation Fund for Clean Air Program with approximately $789,000 for eligible capital projects and programs within Alameda County. The Call for Projects period ended on July 18, 2025.

On September 25, 2025, Alameda CTC approved Union City’s Arizona Street Bike Boulevard improvements project, in the amount of $23,000, from the FY 2025-2026 Transportation Fund for Clean Air Program.

DISCUSSION
Funding for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard Project is identified in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Project Plan; however, the opportunity for additional funding through the TFCA Program enables enhanced project design and construction. The full project will include pavement resurfacing, striping, signage, and other enhancements (as allowed by the budget) to create a safer corridor for bicyclists.

FISCAL IMPACT
The adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Project Plan includes $400,000 in funding for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard project within FY 2025-2026.

Union City Project No. 25-55
Arizona Street Bike Boulevard
FY 2025-2026
Adopted Budget
Fund 251-SB 1 Road Maint & Rehab Fund $300,000
Fund 267-Measure BB Bike & Ped Fund $100,000
Total $400,000
Union City will receive the additional $23,000 in funding through the Alameda CTC Project Funding Agreement (PFA) No. A25-0065 for the Union City Arizona Street Bike Boulevard Project, City Project No. 25-55. City Council action is necessary to amend the FY 2025 - 2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund budget, as detailed below and in the attached resolution.

The $23,000 in grant revenues will be recognized under 410-92555-44502 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Arizona Street Bike Boulevard Project – Misc. County/Local Grants). The project budget will increase by $23,000 for account 410-92555-57100 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Arizona Street Bike Boulevard Project – CIP Project Budget)
There will be no fiscal impact on the General Fund.
72 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.5
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 February 10, 2026 73 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.5
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 February 10, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Accepting the $23,000 grant via the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) Project Funding Agreement No. A25-0056 and authorizing the use of those funds for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard, City Project No. 25-55; and

2. Amending the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund revenue budget by increasing the revenue projection in Account Number 410-92555-44502 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Arizona Street Bike Boulevard – Misc. County/Local Grants) by $23,000; and

3. Amending the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund expenditure budget by appropriating $23,000 to Account Number 410-92555-57128 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Arizona Street Bike Boulevard – Street Improvements) for Arizona Street Bike Boulevard, City Project No. 25-55; and

4. Authorizing the City Manager to sign Alameda CTC PFA No. A25-0056, which awards a grant in the amount of $23,000 to the City for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard, City Project No. 25-55, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Prepared by: Trieu Tran, Civil Engineer III
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – PFA A25-0065

2. Draft Resolution
74 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version

PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT
between

ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
and the

CITY OF UNION CITY
for the

ARIZONA STREET BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS
This Project Funding Agreement (“AGREEMENT”), dated for reference purposes only as of October 23, 2025, is by and between ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a joint powers agency (“ALAMEDA CTC”), and the CITY OF UNION CITY, a public agency (“PROJECT SPONSOR”).

This AGREEMENT obligates funds from one or more ALAMEDA CTC administered funding programs as indicated below, and as further specified in Appendix A: Project Control Information and Appendix B:

Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this AGREEMENT, for the PROJECT, as such term is defined in Recital K below.
☐ 2000 Measure B
☐ 2014 Measure BB
☐ Vehicle Registration Fee
☒ Transportation Fund for Clean Air
☐ CMA TIP

RECITALS
A. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to the provisions of the Bay Area County Traffic and Transportation Funding Act, Public Utilities Code Section 131000, et seq., approved Measure B at the General Election held in November 1986, authorizing the collection of a one-half cent transaction and use tax over a fifteen (15)-year period to address major transportation needs and congestion in Alameda County and giving Alameda County Transportation Authority (“ACTA”) the responsibility for the administration of the proceeds of the tax. The proceeds from the 1986 Measure B tax have been and continue to be used to pay for investments as outlined in the 1986 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan (“1986 TEP”), as it may be amended. Although collection of the 1986 Measure B tax ceased in 2002, capital projects funded wholly or in part by 1986 Measure B funds are still being delivered using these funds.

B. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to the provisions of the Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act, Public Utilities Code Section 180000, et seq., approved the reauthorization of Measure B at the General Election held on November 7, 2000, authorizing the collection of a one-half cent transaction and use tax to be collected for twenty (20) years beginning April 1, 2002 and giving Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority (“ACTIA”) responsibility for the administration of the proceeds of the tax.. The proceeds from the 2000 Measure B tax have been and continue to be used to pay for investments as outlined in the 2000 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan (“2000 TEP”), as it may be amended.

C. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to Section 65089.20 of the Government Code, approved Measure F, the Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), authorizing Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (“ACCMA”) to administer the proceeds from a $10 per year vehicle registration fee on Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 75 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
each annual motor-vehicle registration in Alameda County, starting with registrations effective July 2011 with collection beginning in May 2011, six months following approval of Measure F. Vehicles subject to the VRF include all motorized vehicles, including passenger cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty trucks, heavy-duty trucks, buses of all sizes, motorcycles, and motorized camper homes, unless vehicles are expressly exempted from the payment of the VRF.

D. By resolutions adopted by the ACTA and ACTIA Boards on June 24, 2010, all of ACTA’s functions and responsibilities were assigned to, and accepted by, ACTIA. On that same date, the ACTIA and ACCMA Boards took the final actions to create ALAMEDA CTC, a joint powers authority with all responsibilities of ACTIA and ACCMA. Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the ACTIA and ACCMA Boards and the Commission of ALAMEDA CTC, ACCMA and ACTIA were terminated as of the close of business on February 29, 2012, with ALAMEDA CTC designated as the successor entity. All of its predecessors’ functions and responsibilities have been assigned to, and accepted by, ALAMEDA CTC.

E. The voters of Alameda County, pursuant to the provisions of the Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act, California Public Utilities Code Section 180000 et seq., approved Measure BB at the General Election held on November 4, 2014, authorizing the extension of an existing one-half of one percent transaction and use tax scheduled to terminate on March 31, 2022, and the augmentation of the tax by one-half of one percent, and giving ALAMEDA CTC responsibility for the administration of the proceeds of the 2014 Measure BB tax. The duration of the 2014 Measure BB tax will be 30 years from the initial year of collection, which began April 1, 2015, with said tax to terminate/expire on March 31, 2045. The proceeds from the 2014 Measure BB will be used to pay for investments as outlined in the 2014 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan (“2014 TEP”), as it may be amended.

F. As the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (“TFCA”) Program Manager in Alameda County, ALAMEDA CTC annually programs 40 percent of the TFCA funds collected in Alameda County. ALAMEDA CTC receives these funds from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“AIR DISTRICT”), and then distributes these funds on a reimbursement basis to eligible project sponsors.

G. ALAMEDA CTC is continuing the implementation of the CMA Exchange Program, originally established by the ACCMA, for the purpose of providing local or otherwise unrestricted funds to ALAMEDA CTC for use in projects and programs adopted into the CMA Transportation Improvement Program (“CMA TIP”) by ALAMEDA CTC.

H. The funding programs administered by ALAMEDA CTC and available for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of 1986 Measure B, 2000 Measure B, 2014 Measure BB, VRF, TFCA, and CMA TIP, are collectively defined as and shall be referenced herein as the “ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS”. Requirements related to 2000 Measure B, VRF and 2014 Measure BB Direct Local Distribution (“DLD”) funding distributed pursuant to 2000 Measure B, VRF and 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plans are covered by separate agreements between ALAMEDA CTC and DLD recipients.

I. Measure B, Measure BB, VRF, and TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT shall be programmed, allocated, and expended for the purpose defined and in accordance with the provisions set Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 76 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
forth in the applicable transportation expenditure plans, or the AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA County Program Manager Policies.

J. ALAMEDA CTC programs and allocates ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS through the ALAMEDA CTC Comprehensive Investment Plan (“CIP”) that is updated periodically to summarize the programming and allocations of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, and the policies, procedures and requirements related to the expenditure of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

K. The PROJECT SPONSOR is implementing a project or program (“PROJECT”) that is eligible for ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS. The PROJECT and the strategy to implement the PROJECT are described in greater detail in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

L. This AGREEMENT obligates funds from one or more of ALAMEDA CTC administered funding programs as specified in Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this Agreement, for the PROJECT and the phase(s) described in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are available to reimburse eligible costs incurred by PROJECT SPONSOR for the PROJECT and the phase(s) described in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

M. The issuance of bonds or another financing mechanism are possible funding options as part of ALAMEDA CTC administered funding programs to meet cash flow requirements of each individual program based on current schedule and project delivery information.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:

SECTION I
PROJECT SPONSOR AGREES:

1. PROJECT SPONSOR shall implement the PROJECT in accordance with all requirements in this AGREEMENT and the following appendices attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. a. Appendix A: Project Control Information
b. Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this Agreement c. Appendix C: Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements d. Appendix D: Local Business Contract Equity Program
e. Appendix E: Deliverables and Due Dates
f. Appendix F: Project Performance Measures
g. Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements

2. PROJECT SPONSOR shall perform the necessary work associated with the PROJECT required to implement PROJECT as described in Appendix A: Project Control Information.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 77 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version

3. PROJECT SPONSOR shall inform ALAMEDA CTC in writing of any changes to the information contained in Appendix A: Project Control Information as soon as PROJECT SPONSOR becomes aware of such changes. Per Section III.2, any change that requires an amendment to this AGREEMENT must be approved by ALAMEDA CTC prior to PROJECT SPONSOR implementing the change.

4. PROJECT SPONSOR shall commit to the timing of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS as described in Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this Agreement.

5. PROJECT SPONSOR shall expend ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS received under this AGREEMENT in accordance with all applicable provisions of law and shall return to ALAMEDA CTC all funds that are not expended in accordance with all applicable provisions of law.

6. PROJECT SPONSOR shall be responsible for costs in excess of the total funding obligations shown in Appendix A: Project Control Information. Costs in excess of the total funding obligations will not be reimbursed with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS unless this AGREEMENT is amended in writing or the parties execute a separate agreement for a subsequent phase of the PROJECT.

7. PROJECT SPONSOR shall return to ALAMEDA CTC, on a pro-rated basis, funds realized from the sale of any vehicle(s) purchased with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, if the sale of the vehicle(s) is completed prior to the last day of the last year listed as the PROJECT’S “Years of Effectiveness” as identified in either Appendix A: Project Control Information or Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements, as applicable. The amount of sale proceeds required to be returned to ALAMEDA CTC shall be proportional to the percentage of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS originally used to purchase the vehicle(s).

8. PROJECT SPONSOR staff costs for any local agency which receives DLD funding shall not be eligible for reimbursement from ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS allocated to the PROJECT unless staff costs are specifically identified as eligible in Appendix A: Project Control Information. Staff costs included in Appendix A are limited to project implementation costs. Staff costs related to the administration of this AGREEMENT including preparation of requests for reimbursement or progress reports are ineligible for reimbursement. PROJECT SPONSOR staff costs funded by other sources can be included in the total cost for the purpose of meeting the cost and risk sharing provisions of this AGREEMENT.

9. PROJECT SPONSOR staff costs eligible for reimbursement may include the individual’s actual hourly wage plus a fringe benefit rate, as approved by a cognizant agency or an independent auditor, of up to a maximum of 70% of the hourly wage. Staff costs also may include direct costs including contracted services, such as legal counsel, that are considered an extension of the PROJECT SPONSOR’S staff.

10. PROJECT SPONSOR overhead, or "indirect," costs are not eligible for reimbursement from ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT, and shall not be included in the total eligible PROJECT cost calculations used to determine the ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS share of such total eligible PROJECT costs.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 78 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version

11. The cost of maintenance, security, or protection performed by PROJECT SPONSOR or thirdparty contractors during any temporary suspension of activities associated with the PROJECT will not be considered an eligible cost for reimbursement by ALAMEDA CTC.

12. PROJECT SPONSOR shall advertise, award and administer all professional services and construction contracts for PROJECT work not performed by PROJECT SPONSOR. PROJECT SPONSOR shall invite ALAMEDA CTC staff to participate as a voting member of PROJECT SPONSOR’s selection panel for the selection of all professional consultants.

13. All locally funded contracts approved by PROJECT SPONSOR, funded wholly or in part with Measure B, Measure BB, and/or Vehicle Registration Fee funds administered by ALAMEDA CTC, except for contracts that also include state and/or federal funds or contracts funding non-capital projects (e.g., transit operations), are required to comply with ALAMEDA CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program as listed and described in Appendix D: Local Business Contract Equity Program Requirements. PROJECT SPONSOR shall comply with the reporting requirements set forth in the LBCE Program and provide the required information to ALAMEDA CTC in accordance with Appendix D for all contracts partially or wholly funded by ALAMEDA CTC, whether or not the specific contract is subject to the LBCE Program. If ALAMEDA CTC determines that PROJECT SPONSOR has failed to fully comply with all LBCE Program requirements, including but not limited to meeting all reporting requirements in a timely manner, ALAMEDA CTC may take one or more of the following actions, until compliance or remedial action has been accomplished by the PROJECT SPONSOR to the satisfaction of ALAMEDA CTC:
a. Deem PROJECT SPONSOR to be noncompliant, and place PROJECT SPONSOR on a corrective action plan;
b. Impose sanctions on PROJECT SPONSOR, including suspension and termination of all ALAMEDA CTC funding assistance;
c. Decline approval of projects, grants, or contracts;
d. Withhold reimbursements to PROJECT SPONSOR for existing grants and contracts; and/or e. Other actions deemed appropriate by ALAMEDA CTC under the circumstances.

14. To facilitate ALAMEDA CTC’s monitoring of PROJECT SPONSOR’s compliance with the LBCE Program, PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide ALAMEDA CTC with drafts of (i) all procurement documents which address (or would be expected to address) LBCE Program or Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation goals and requirements (i.e., RFPs, RFQs, construction special provisions, and notices to bidders/proposers), in each case prior to advertisement, and (ii) PROJECT SPONSOR’s form professional services contract, prior to contract award.

15. PROJECT SPONSOR shall require insurance coverage that names ALAMEDA CTC, its governing body, officers, employees and consultants as additional insureds of the PROJECT SPONSOR, professional services consultants and subconsultants, construction services contractors and subcontractors, volunteer service individuals, and any other contractors or subcontractors involved with the PROJECT on all insurance required by PROJECT SPONSOR for PROJECT. PROJECT SPONSOR shall keep and maintain insurance certificates and policy endorsements evidencing the policies on file, and furnish the same to ALAMEDA CTC upon request. ALAMEDA CTC will not be responsible for any premiums or assessments on Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 79 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
any policy. If this AGREEMENT includes any TFCA funds, PROJECT SPONSOR shall also comply with the insurance requirements specified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements.

16. PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide ALAMEDA CTC with periodic (i.e., quarterly or semiannually) progress reports describing the current status of the PROJECT. The required progress reporting frequency schedule and forms are provided in Appendix C: Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements. Progress reports are due by the last day of each calendar month following the established reporting period in which the work was performed. These reports shall include PROJECT status information such as the scope of work completed to date, total costs incurred, future actions, project performance, issues identification, changes to scope or schedule, and any additional relevant information requested by ALAMEDA CTC.

17. PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit to ALAMEDA CTC a Request for Reimbursement in accordance with the minimum required invoicing frequency established for the PROJECT, but not more than one such request per month, for reimbursement of eligible PROJECT costs and expenses incurred by PROJECT SPONSOR. The required minimum invoicing frequency and invoice forms are provided in Appendix C:

Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements. If PROJECT SPONSOR does not incur any reimbursable expenses during the minimum invoicing period, in lieu of submitting an invoice, PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit a letter or a statement as part of the required progress report for the same period confirming that no reimbursable costs were incurred during the given period. If PROJECT SPONSOR requests reimbursement for costs incurred as a result of a contract or agreement with a third party that contains a contract value of $50,000 or greater, e.g. a consultant, contractor or other entity, PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit an electronic copy of the fully executed contract or agreement to ALAMEDA CTC prior to ALAMEDA CTC authorizing reimbursement of such costs. Supporting documentation for the Request for Reimbursement packages includes copies of invoices from vendors, consultants, or contractors and summaries of eligible PROJECT SPONSOR staff time charges. PROJECT SPONSOR may suggest an alternative method, subject to approval in advance by ALAMEDA CTC, to document staff costs charged to the PROJECT.

18. PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit to ALAMEDA CTC a Prime Consultant/Contractor LBE, SLBE, and VSLBE Utilization Report with each of PROJECT SPONSOR’s invoices for the PROJECT, regardless of whether any reimbursable costs were incurred during the given period. The report shall include the AGREEMENT number, prime consultant/contractor name, the project title, scope of work, names of all subconsultants and their contract budgets and total costs incurred, and any additional relevant information requested by ALAMEDA CTC.

19. PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide a Parcel and Utility Agreement Tracking Log upon ALAMEDA CTC’s request, if the PROJECT includes the acquisition of right-of-way and/or the relocation or protection of utility facilities.

20. PROJECT SPONSOR shall keep all necessary PROJECT records to demonstrate compliance with this AGREEMENT, including documentation of activities, performance, progress reports, final report, expenses and charges to support invoices submitted to ALAMEDA CTC and other PROJECT reporting requirements as described in Appendix C: Alameda CTC Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements in one central location for a period of not less than five (5) years after the later of (i) ALAMEDA Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 80 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
CTC’s payment of the final invoice, (ii) the PROJECT SPONSOR’S submittal of the Final Report for ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS under this AGREEMENT, and (iii) the end of the PROJECT’S established “Years of Effectiveness” period (as identified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements) if any TFCA funds are provided under this AGREEMENT. a. PROJECT SPONSOR and PROJECT SPONSOR’s contractors and subcontractors shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. b. PROJECT SPONSOR shall allow ALAMEDA CTC or its authorized representatives to inspect, audit, or make copies of any PROJECT records for a period of five (5) years after ALAMEDA CTC’s payment of the final invoice and the PROJECT SPONSOR’S submittal of the Final Report. The same access also shall be granted to the AIR DISTRICT or its authorized representatives for TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT.

21. PROJECT SPONSOR shall comply with all of the following publicity requirements to inform the public on the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS on the PROJECT. a. PROJECT SPONSOR shall credit ALAMEDA CTC as a funding source and display the approved ALAMEDA CTC logo, where practical, on construction informational signs, vehicles or equipment operated or obtained as part of the PROJECT, and on any publicly distributed information (e.g., fact sheets, flyers, brochures, maps, schedules, websites, press releases), created for or associated with the PROJECT. For TFCA funding obligated through this AGREEMENT, SPONSOR shall also credit the AIR DISTRICT as a funding source and display the AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA logo.
b. PROJECT SPONSOR shall provide updated and accurate PROJECT information on the PROJECT SPONSOR’s website, or create such a website if none exists, and provide a link to ALAMEDA CTC website.
c. PROJECT SPONSOR shall publish an article in a printed or electronically distributed publication such as a newsletter, local newspaper, e-publications, or website highlighting the PROJECT and the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS at least once per fiscal year.

For TFCA funding obligated through this AGREEMENT, SPONSOR shall also credit the AIR DISTRICT as a funding source.
d. PROJECT SPONSOR shall document compliance with the publicity requirements and furnish such documentation upon request, and regularly through the progress and final reporting required by this AGREEMENT, through evidence such as photos of construction and vehicle signage, copies of print, electronic and other media published to satisfy this requirement.

For TFCA funding obligated through this AGREEMENT, SPONSOR shall also document that the AIR DISTRICT was credited as a funding source and the AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA logos were displayed.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 81 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
e. PROJECT SPONSOR shall notify ALAMEDA CTC and request an exemption as soon as it is reasonably known that the PROJECT SPONSOR is unable to fulfill the requirements under this Section I.21 due to extraordinary circumstances.

22. PROJECT SPONSOR shall, to the extent not otherwise prohibited by law, and to the extent required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code section 7920.000 et seq.), place in the public domain any software, written document, or other product developed with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS received through this AGREEMENT.

23. PROJECT SPONSOR shall participate, upon the request of ALAMEDA CTC, in a Public Awareness Program in partnership with ALAMEDA CTC and/or its community advisory committees as a means of informing the public of the benefits derived from the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

24. PROJECT SPONSOR shall obtain all state, local and federal permits and approvals for work, including environmental approvals in accordance with the National Environment Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as applicable. PROJECT SPONSOR will comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations.

25. PROJECT SPONSOR shall render a report or answer any and all inquiries, upon ALAMEDA CTC’s request, in regards to its receipt of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, compliance audit findings, and usage of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS before the ALAMEDA CTC Commission, Independent Watchdog Committee, and/or community advisory committees, as applicable.

26. For TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, a PROJECT SPONSOR who has failed an AIR DISTRICT financial or performance audit for the PROJECT will be excluded from receiving an award of any TFCA funds for five (5) years from the date of AIR DISTRICT’s final audit determination. Existing TFCA funds already awarded to the SPONSOR will not be released until all audit recommendations and remedies have been satisfactorily implemented. A failed AIR DISTRICT financial audit means a final audit report that includes an uncorrected audit finding that confirms an ineligible expenditure of TFCA funds. A failed AIR DISTRICT performance audit means that the PROJECT was not implemented in accordance with the AGREEMENT. SPONSOR shall be afforded a reasonable amount of time to address/cure adverse audit findings.

27. For TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall return to ALAMEDA CTC, on a pro-rated basis, TFCA funds received under this Agreement if PROJECT is not maintained and/or operated throughout, and at least until the conclusion of, its “Years of Effectiveness” as identified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements.

28. For TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit a TFCA Final Report to ALAMEDA CTC when identified as applicable in Appendix C: Request for Reimbursement and Reporting Requirements. The required content for the TFCA Final Report is identified in the TFCA Final Report Form referenced in Appendix G.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 82 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version

SECTION II
ALAMEDA CTC AGREES:

1. ALAMEDA CTC shall make a good faith effort to provide all ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT.

2. ALAMEDA CTC shall assist PROJECT SPONSOR when able, upon request and as necessary, in resolving issues related to the PROJECT.

3. ALAMEDA CTC shall provide a copy of its approved logo for PROJECT SPONSOR to use as required by this AGREEMENT.

4. ALAMEDA CTC shall provide notice to the PROJECT SPONSOR of any and all expenditures made by PROJECT SPONSOR, which are not in compliance with the AGREEMENT or the applicable ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS promptly after ALAMEDA CTC becomes aware of any such expenditures.

5. ALAMEDA CTC shall provide timely notice to PROJECT SPONSOR prior to conducting an audit of expenditures made by PROJECT SPONSOR to determine whether such expenditures are compliant with this AGREEMENT or the applicable ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT may be shifted between the phases of the PROJECT or between activities in the same phase of the PROJECT, so long as each of the following occurs: 1) PROJECT SPONSOR submits a written amendment request that provides revised and updated Appendix A: Project Control Information forms documenting the requested funding obligation shift and demonstrating to ALAMEDA CTC’s satisfaction that the phase or activity from which the funds were shifted remains fully funded, and 2) the parties execute an amendment to this AGREEMENT incorporating the revised and updated Appendix A forms as described above, which amendment shall be approved by ALAMEDA CTC pursuant to applicable ALAMEDA CTC policies.

2. ALAMEDA CTC and the PROJECT SPONSOR may jointly authorize an “Administrative Amendment” for any minor schedule revisions, deliverables, or budget revisions that do not increase the total ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT. Any change in the PROJECT scope of work must be approved by ALAMEDA CTC prior to implementation of the change by the PROJECT SPONSOR. Administrative amendment requests sent to ALAMEDA CTC must include a revised Appendix A:

Project Control Information which reflects the requested changes by the PROJECT SPONSOR.

3. For the purposes of this AGREEMENT, (i) a “Contract” shall mean and refer to a third party agreement with the PROJECT SPONSOR for services related to PROJECT, including agreements with another public agency, consultant firm, contractor or entity; (ii) “PROJECT SPONSOR Staff” costs include costs for Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 83 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
staff dedicated directly to project implementation, management, oversight, and/or project development and may include direct costs including contracted services, such as legal counsel, that are considered an extension of PROJECT SPONSOR Staff; (iii) “Capital” with respect to any Right-of-Way Capital phase shall mean and refer to the cost to acquire real property, access rights and other property interests; and (iv) “Agreement Expiration Date” shall mean and refer to the expiration date of this AGREEMENT.

4. Reimbursable costs will be limited to the costs shown in Appendix A: Project Control Information. Funds expended for work directly related to the phases of the PROJECT covered by this AGREEMENT prior to the applicable allowable start date identified in Appendix B: ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS Obligated by this AGREEMENT are ineligible for reimbursement pursuant to this AGREEMENT. ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are subject to fund availability and any new requirements and policies imposed by ALAMEDA CTC. The AGREEMENT shall be amended, as necessary, to reflect the applicable requirements.

5. If additional local, state or federal funding is obtained to partially offset ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS planned for the PROJECT, ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS will not be transferred from the PROJECT until after it is ensured that all phases of the PROJECT can be fully delivered.

ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS offset by additional local, state or federal funding shall be available for PROJECT only after all other funding planned for PROJECT, as described in Appendix A: Project Control Information, has been committed and/or encumbered to the PROJECT.

6. Should any portion of PROJECT be financed with federal or state funds, all applicable laws, rules and policies relating to the use of such funds shall apply, notwithstanding other provisions of this AGREEMENT.

7. For TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, this AGREEMENT is subject to the current AIR DISTRICT-approved TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies included in Appendix G:

Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements and any new requirements imposed by the AIR DISTRICT upon ALAMEDA CTC with respect to the TFCA funds distributed hereunder. ALAMEDA CTC will only distribute TFCA funds under this AGREEMENT to the extent the documented project costs are eligible under the applicable AIR DISTRICT TFCA Policies.

8. The laws of the State of California shall govern this AGREEMENT.

9. All correspondence and communications will contain ALAMEDA CTC project number and name for PROJECT in a clearly identifiable location. For projects with TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, all correspondence and communications will also contain the TFCA project number as identified in Appendix G: Transportation Fund for Clean Air Policies and Requirements.

10. ALAMEDA CTC reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT work and records when determined to be necessary or appropriate and PROJECT SPONSOR agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with ALAMEDA CTC by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records promptly available for audit and copying.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 84 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version

11. PROJECT costs incurred by PROJECT SPONSOR are only eligible for reimbursement on a prorated basis unless specifically provided for in Appendix A: Project Control Information, and PROJECT SPONSOR is expected to concurrently seek reimbursement from the other sources shown in Project A: Project Control Information. Pro-rated basis, as used herein, equals the amount of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT to a phase, divided by the total funding for the phase, as shown in Appendix A: Project Control Information. For any Request for Reimbursement which includes such expenditures, PROJECT SPONSOR shall (i) report the total expenditures during the reimbursement period, (ii) indicate the percentage of the total expenditures for the phase expected to be funded by ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT, and (iii) request reimbursement for the dollar amount which equals the product of such total expenditures and such percentage.

12. ALAMEDA CTC approval of PROJECT SPONSOR submitted Requests for Reimbursement will be contingent on the submittal of progress reports and deliverables by PROJECT SPONSOR as required by this AGREEMENT. In the event that progress reports and deliverables are not complete and current, approval of Requests for Reimbursement shall be withheld until an acceptable remedy has been implemented and approved by ALAMEDA CTC. If PROJECT SPONSOR fails to submit the required deliverables or otherwise fails to meet the reporting and invoicing requirements of this AGREEMENT, ALAMEDA CTC may deobligate funds from the PROJECT and this AGREEMENT. Not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of any such action, ALAMEDA CTC will endeavor to notify PROJECT SPONSOR in writing that the required deliverables, invoicing and reporting is overdue.

13. Request for Reimbursements submitted after the Agreement Expiration Date identified in Appendix B: Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by this AGREEMENT will be ineligible for reimbursement by ALAMEDA CTC unless an exception is requested by the PROJECT SPONSOR no less than sixty (60) days before the Agreement Expiration Date, and the exception is approved by ALAMEDA CTC.

ALAMEDA CTC will deobligate any remaining ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS from PROJECT and this AGREEMENT.

14. Each Right-of-Way transaction which is funded either wholly or in part with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS shall be subject to repayment or reimbursement to ALAMEDA CTC under ALAMEDA CTC Policies in effect as of the effective date of this AGREEMENT, irrespective of the party holding title to the real estate which is the subject of the Right-of-Way transaction in question. The parties agree that Section III.15(a) through Section III.15(f), the provisions of which are intended to provide further detail regarding the application of such Policies, shall govern the extent to which such repayment is required and the conditions applicable to any such repayment. If such Policies are amended after the effective date of this AGREEMENT by ALAMEDA CTC, the PROJECT SPONSOR and ALAMEDA CTC shall execute an amendment to this AGREEMENT which references the revised Policies.

15. For the purposes of the following provisions, “ALAMEDA CTC Share” shall mean the percentage share of the original property purchase price funded by ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS (i.e., if the purchase was fully funded by ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, ALAMEDA CTC Share shall equal 100%); any appraisal required under Section III.15(a) and Section III.15(f) only, shall be conducted at no cost to ALAMEDA CTC; “Fair Market Value” of a given property shall mean the net proceeds from the sale of such property if such sale occurs in an open market transaction or by auction, or the value of the property determined by an independent third-party appraisal of the property if some or all of the property is Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 85 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
retained by PROJECT SPONSOR or otherwise transferred to any other party without an auction or open market transaction; and “CPI” means the Consumer Price Index, All Items for All Urban Consumers, San FranciscoOakland, San Jose, CA. a. If any property is acquired for the PROJECT using ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS to finance some or all of the acquisition, and the PROJECT is cancelled or otherwise does not begin construction within five (5) years after the effective date of AGREEMENT (as such deadline may be extended by agreement between the parties hereto), then PROJECT SPONSOR shall, within one (1) year after such cancellation decision or the expiration of such five (5) year period, reimburse ALAMEDA CTC for the greater of the following:

ALAMEDA CTC Share of the property’s Fair Market Value or the full amount of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS used to acquire the property, as escalated by the increase in the CPI during the most recent period for which CPI data is available which is equal in length to the period between the date ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS were paid to PROJECT SPONSOR and the date reimbursement is made to ALAMEDA CTC. b. If any property is acquired for the PROJECT using ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS to finance some or all of the acquisition and only a portion of the acquired property is required for the PROJECT, and if the PROJECT begins construction within five (5) years after the effective date of this AGREEMENT (as such deadline may be extended by agreement between the parties hereto), then PROJECT SPONSOR shall, within one (1) year after PROJECT completion, reimburse ALAMEDA CTC for ALAMEDA CTC Share of the Fair Market Value of any property determined to be “excess property”. c. If the PROJECT begins construction within five (5) years after the effective date of this AGREEMENT (as such deadline may be extended by agreement between the parties hereto), then except as provided in subparagraph (d) below, no reimbursement is due with respect to any property interest acquired for the project using ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS if the entirety of the acquired property is required for the PROJECT. d. If PROJECT SPONSOR anticipates receiving net revenues (i.e., rental or other income generated by the property, less reasonable costs for insurance, maintenance and related items) from any property acquired using ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS, PROJECT SPONSOR shall notify ALAMEDA CTC on how PROJECT SPONSOR will use such revenue to offset other project costs, and document such revenue separately in project reimbursement requests.
e. If PROJECT is suspended, PROJECT SPONSOR shall pay all property management costs. f. Property that is required for the PROJECT and acquired wholly or in part with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS shall be available for PROJECT construction within ten (10) years of ALAMEDA CTC reimbursement to the PROJECT SPONSOR. If, after ten (10) years, PROJECT has not been completed, PROJECT SPONSOR shall reimburse ALAMEDA CTC Share of the fair market value of the property, based on the net proceeds from the sale of Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 86 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
the property or an appraisal of the property conducted at no cost to ALAMEDA CTC, within one (1) year after the expiration of this ten (10) year period.

16. If condemnation procedures are required to obtain possession to Right-of-Way, ALAMEDA CTC will consider the required deposit as an eligible cost and reimburse the PROJECT SPONSOR upon request.

PROJECT SPONSOR shall submit documentation of the final order of condemnation settlement within ninety (90) days after the date of the court recording of the final order of condemnation. If the amount of ALAMEDA CTC reimbursement to the PROJECT SPONSOR is higher than ALAMEDA CTC Share of the amount of settlement in the final order of condemnation, the PROJECT SPONSOR shall pay ALAMEDA CTC the difference between the amount reimbursed and ALAMEDA CTC Share of the amount settled plus ALAMEDA CTC Share of the interest accrued to the deposit account within one (1) year of the final order of condemnation.

17. PROJECT SPONSOR shall not initiate condemnation of any property until full funding for the construction of the PROJECT has been secured.

18. Reimbursement to PROJECT SPONSOR by ALAMEDA CTC for PROJECT Right-of-Way is limited to the following (and net of any relocation payments provided by other sources):
a. The cost to purchase all real property required for the PROJECT free and clear of liens and/or conflicting easements, including the costs for preparation of documents, negotiations and legal services.
b. The cost of damages to owners of the remainder of real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by PROJECT.
c. The cost of relocation payments and services provided to owners and occupants pursuant to the appropriate State laws and regulations when the PROJECT displaces an individual, family, business, farm operation or nonprofit organization. d. The cost of demolition and/or the sale of all improvements on the right-of-way. Proceeds from the sale of any such improvements shall be credited to the PROJECT and used to offset PROJECT costs.
e. The cost of all unavoidable utility relocation, protection or removal necessary for the completion of the PROJECT.
f. The cost of all necessary hazardous material and hazardous waste treatment, encapsulation or removal and protective storage for which PROJECT SPONSOR accepts responsibility and where the actual generator cannot be identified and recovery made.

19. If PROJECT SPONSOR materially breaches this AGREEMENT, including but not limited to (i) failing to deliver the PROJECT within the schedule defined by this AGREEMENT without compelling reason, (ii) failing to file required progress reports in the time specified by this AGREEMENT, or (iii) failing to comply with applicable regulations, ALAMEDA CTC may either terminate this AGREEMENT or suspend payments to Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 87 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
PROJECT SPONSOR until such time as PROJECT SPONSOR makes reasonable efforts to cure any such breach and comply with all provisions of this AGREEMENT.

20. Neither ALAMEDA CTC, nor its governing body or any officer, consultant, or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by PROJECT SPONSOR in connection with the PROJECT. It is also understood and agreed, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, PROJECT SPONSOR shall fully defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless ALAMEDA CTC, its governing body, and all its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-ininterest, against any and all liability, loss, expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, or claims for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) or damages occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by PROJECT SPONSOR in connection with PROJECT, including the performance of the PROJECT or operation or use of the equipment that is subject to this AGREEMENT. If TFCA funds are obligated by this AGREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall also fully defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless the AIR DISTRICT, its governing body, and all its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-ininterest, from any liability imposed on the AIR DISTRICT for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by PROJECT SPONSOR in connection with PROJECT.

21. Neither PROJECT SPONSOR, nor its governing body or any officer, consultant, or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ALAMEDA CTC under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to ALAMEDA CTC under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, ALAMEDA CTC shall fully defend, protect, indemnify and hold harmless PROJECT SPONSOR, its governing body, and all its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-in-interest, against any and all liability, loss, expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, or claims for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) or damages occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ALAMEDA CTC in connection with PROJECT, including the performance of the PROJECT or operation or use of the equipment that is subject to this AGREEMENT.

22. Nothing in the provisions of this AGREEMENT is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not party to this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than ALAMEDA CTC and PROJECT SPONSOR and has no third-party beneficiaries.

23. All legal actions by either party against the other arising from this AGREEMENT, or for the failure to perform in accordance with the applicable standard of care, or for any other cause of action, will be subject to the statutes of limitations of the State of California.

24. Should it become necessary to enforce the terms of this AGREEMENT, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees from the other party.

25. This AGREEMENT shall terminate upon the Agreement Expiration Date identified in Appendix B: Funds Obligated by this AGREEMENT unless this AGREEMENT is extended by mutual agreement of the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Sections I.7, I.19, III.20 and III.21 shall survive the termination or expiration of this AGREEMENT. PROJECT SPONSOR has 90 days after the Agreement Expiration Date to submit complete and accurate invoices to ALAMEDA CTC to make final allowable Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 88 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version
payments for PROJECT costs in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. Failure to submit complete and accurate invoices within this period of time shall result in a waiver by PROJECT SPONSOR of its right to reimbursement of expended costs for which invoices have not yet been submitted.

26. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of either party on any breach or default by the other party shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

27. This AGREEMENT, including its Recitals and Appendices, constitutes the entire AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be changed only as allowed in Section III.1 and Section III.2 of this AGREEMENT or by a written amendment executed by both parties. [Signatures on the next page]
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 89 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version

CITY OF UNION CITY
(PROJECT SPONSOR)

ALAMEDA COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
(ALAMEDA CTC)
By: By:

Joan Malloy Date
City Manager
Tony Tavares Date
Executive Director
Recommended
By:

Vivek Bhat Date
Deputy Executive Director of
Project Delivery
Reviewed as to Budget/Financial Controls:

By:

Patricia Reavey Date
Deputy Executive Director of
Finance and Administration
Approved as to Legal Form: Approved as to Legal Form:

By: By:

Kristopher Kokotaylo Date
Legal Counsel to CITY OF UNION CITY
Fennemore LLP Date
Legal Counsel to ALAMEDA CTC
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 1/26/2026
Attested:

By: _________________________________________
Thai Nam N. Pham Date
City Clerk
90 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007

2025 PFA Version

LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: PROJECT CONTROL INFORMATION
Appendix A-1 Project Description
Appendix A-2 Project Scope Detail by Phase
Appendix A-3 Project Milestone Schedule
Appendix A-4 Project Cost Estimate Summary by Phase and Fund Source Appendix A-5 Project Funding Summary by Phase and Reimbursement Ratio Appendix A-6 Project Phase Cost Detail
APPENDIX B: ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS OBLIGATED BY THIS AGREEMENT APPENDIX C: ALAMEDA CTC REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX D: LOCAL BUSINESS CONTRACT EQUITY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX E: DELIVERABLES AND DUE DATES
APPENDIX F: PROJECT PERFORMANCE MEASURES
APPENDIX G: TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS Appendix G-1 TFCA Project Number and “Years of Effectiveness” Appendix G-2 TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies and Insurance Requirements Appendix G-3 Air District TFCA Logos
Note: Appendix G is only included and attached to this AGREEMENT if TFCA funds are obligated and applicable to AGREEMENT.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 91 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix A – Page 1

APPENDIX A

PROJECT CONTROL INFORMATION
Appendix Index
Appendix A-1 Project Description
Appendix A-2 Project Scope Detail by Phase
Appendix A-3 Project Milestone Schedule
Appendix A-4 Project Cost Estimate Summary by Phase and Fund Source Appendix A-5 Project Funding Summary by Phase and Reimbursement Ratio Appendix A-6 Project Phase Cost Detail
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 92 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix A – Page 2
APPENDIX A-1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Description:

The PROJECT will install Class 2 bike lanes on both sides of Arizona Street within limits as specified below.

Additional improvements will include pedestrian ramp updates to meet ADA standards, roadway surface restoration, improved striping for visibility and safety, advanced stop bar and high visibility crosswalk installations, and wayfinding signage.

Project Location and Limits
• On Arizona Street between Hop Ranch Road and Royal Ann Road Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 93 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix A – Page 3
APPENDIX A-2

PROJECT SCOPE DETAIL BY PHASE
The ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are to support the project phase(s) identified and described below:

CONSTRUCTION
• Implement the PROJECT as described in Appendix A-1
• Costs not eligible for reimbursement by this AGREEMENT include, but are not necessarily limited to:
o Costs incurred for services, fees, or amenities not related to the PROJECT scope as defined in Appendix A-1
o Costs that are not direct project implementation costs, such as indirect costs or staff costs for project/contract/ grant management activities
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 94 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix A – Page 4
APPENDIX A-3

PROJECT MILESTONE SCHEDULE
Phase/Milestone
Begin
(Mo/Yr)
End
(Mo/Yr)
Construction
Release Request for Proposal / Advertisement 03/2026 03/2026 Contract Award 04/2026 04/2026
Construction Activity 05/2026 07/2026
Contract Acceptance 08/2026
Project Closeout 08/2026 12/2026
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 95 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix A – Page 5
APPENDIX A-4

PROJECT COST SUMMARY BY PHASE AND FUND SOURCE
This Project Cost Summary provides a project funding plan for all Project phases, regardless if funded through ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT.

PROJECT COST SUMMARY BY PHASE AND FUND SOURCE
PHASE
Alameda CTC
Administered Funds
Sponsor
Funds Total
TFCA CPM Funding
FYE26 Matching Funds
Preliminary
Engineering /
Enviro. Studies
$ - $10,000 $10,000
Final Design
(PS&E) $ - $75,000 $75,000
Construction $23,000 $377,000 $400,000
Total
Project Cost $23,000 $462,000 $485,000
Notes:

1. ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS identified with a Note 1 are shown within this Project Cost Summary for funding plan informational purposes. These funds are not encumbered within this AGREEMENT.

2. To Be Determined (TBD) Column includes unknown and unsecured funding amounts to the project.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 96 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix A – Page 6
APPENDIX A-5

PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY BY PHASE AND REIMBURSEMENT RATIO (Only Phases Funded with Alameda CTC Administered Funds) The ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT are to support the project phase(s) identified and described below:

PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY BY PHASE AND REIMBURSEMENT RATIO PHASE
Alameda CTC
Administered
Funds
Matching
Funds
Total
Funding
Reimbursement
Ratio
TFCA CPM Percentage
FYE26
Construction $23,000 $377,000 $400,000 N/A
Total Funding $23,000 $377,000 $400,000
Notes:

1. PROJECT SPONSOR shall be reimbursed eligible costs in the percentage of Total ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS to Total Funding per the Reimbursement Ratio Percentage for each phase. Each Alameda CTC Administered Fund amount identified is a not-to-exceed amount. The Reimbursement Ratio is defined as ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS divided by the Total Funding.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 97 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix A – Page 7
APPENDIX A-6

PROJECT PHASE COST DETAIL
This Project Phase Cost Detail summarizes the total cost for each phase with ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated in this AGREEMENT.

PHASE COST DETAIL

CONSTRUCTION TFCA CPM
FYE26
Matching
Funds Total Cost
Sponsor Staff/Labor Cost $ - $ - $ -
Contract(s) $23,000 $377,000 $400,000
Other Direct Costs $ - $ - $ -
Total Phase Cost
(Staff + Contract Costs + Other Direct Costs) $23,000 $377,000 $400,000 Notes:
• The costs and fund sources for all contracts for professional services or construction for the Project shall be shown in the “Contract(s)” line. “Other Direct Costs” consists of expenditures on such items as delivery services, printing services, and travel, where no RFPs/RFQs or bids are required. • Contracts funded with any combination of Measure B, Measure BB, Vehicle Registration Fee and local funds that do not contain State or federal funds are subject to Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity Program (refer to Appendix D).
• Costs and funds may be moved between Contract(s) and Other Direct Costs through an Administrative Amendment pursuant to Section III.2 of this AGREEMENT, so long as (i) ALAMEDA CTC is notified in advance prior to any expenditures on either category in excess of the amounts then shown in this table, and (ii) any proposed amendment which changes the Total Costs for Contract(s) from zero to a positive number must be approved by ALAMEDA CTC prior to PROJECT SPONSOR seeking proposals, qualifications, or bids for such contract(s).

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 98 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix B – Page 1

APPENDIX B

ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS OBLIGATED BY THIS AGREEMENT The following Table B-1 identifies the ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS obligated by this AGREEMENT and establishes a unique allowable start date for each obligated fund source.

TABLE B-1

FUNDS OBLIGATED BY THIS AGREEMENT

AND ALLOWABLE START AND EXPENDITURE DEADLINE DATES
Fund
Source
Fund
Subset Phase
Commission
Approval
Date
Allowable
Start Date
Expenditure
Deadline
Date
Obligated
Amount
TFCA FYE26 CON 10/23/2025 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $23,000 Total Alameda CTC Administered Funds Obligated by AGREEMENT: $23,000 Agreement Expiration Date: June 30, 2027
Notes:

1. ALAMEDA CTC reimbursement amounts by fund source for PROJECT shall not exceed the total amount obligated by this AGREEMENT, by fund source.

2. The Commission Approval Date is the date of the meeting at which the Commission approved the allocation.

3. The Allowable Start Date identified for each fund source is the earliest date at which costs eligible for reimbursement by the fund source indicated may be incurred. Any costs incurred on the PROJECT before this date will not be eligible for reimbursement under this AGREEMENT. The earliest Allowable Start Date shown in this column represents the effective date of this AGREEMENT. The Allowable Start Date may be established as early as the Commission Approval Date of the allocation.

4. The Expenditure Deadline Date is the last date by which eligible reimbursable costs may be incurred. Any costs incurred on the PROJECT after this date will not be eligible for reimbursement under this AGREEMENT.

5. The Agreement Expiration Date shall mean and refer to the expiration date of this AGREEMENT.

6. For TFCA funds obligated by this AGREEMENT, the Expenditure Deadline Date is two (2) years from the date when ALAMEDA CTC first received funds from the AIR DISTRICT or based on the project schedule, whichever is earlier, unless an extension has been approved by ALAMEDA CTC. An estimated Expenditure Deadline Date may be used if at the time of this AGREEMENT Alameda CTC has yet to receive funds from the AIR DISTRICT.

Extended deadlines will be reflected in an amended Table B-1, once approved.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 99 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix C – Page 1

APPENDIX C

REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The below table establishes the required minimum frequency for Requests for Reimbursement and Progress Reports, and final closeout reporting requirements, as indicated below with an “X”.

Notes:

1. For all projects, the maximum frequency for Requests for Reimbursement is one (1) per month.

2. A progress report required regardless of whether expenses occurred or not during the reporting period.

REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING FORMS
Any PROJECT SPONSOR awarded ALAMEDA CTC Administered Funds shall use the following forms included in the link below for progress reporting, final reporting, request for reimbursements, and agreement amendment requests. Note that the format and required content of these forms is subject to change.

List of Downloadable Forms: https://www.alamedactc.org/funding/reporting-and-grant-forms/

1. Request for Reimbursement (RFR) Form

2. Alameda CTC Progress Report Form

3. Alameda CTC Final Report Form

4. Amendment Request Form

REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND REPORTING

FREQUENCY AND DUE DATES
Minimum Frequency Required Period Covered Due Dates
Quarterly (once every 3 months)
Request for Reimbursement ☐ Quarter 1: 7/1– 9/30
Quarter 2: 10/1 – 12/31
Quarter 3: 1/1– 3/31
Quarter 4: 4/1– 6/30
By October 31st
By January 31st
By April 30th
By July 31st Alameda CTC Progress Report ☐
Semi-annually (once every 6 months)
Request for Reimbursement ☒ Quarters 1 & 2: 7/1 – 12/31 Quarters 3 & 4: 1/1 – 6/30
By January 31st
By July 31st Alameda CTC Progress Report ☒
Final Closeout Reporting
Final Request for Reimbursement ☒ Any work period eligible under Appendix B. By Agreement
Expiration Date Alameda CTC Final Report ☒ Entire project period.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 100 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix D – Page 1

APPENDIX D

LOCAL BUSINESS CONTRACT EQUITY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
As noted in Section I.13, PROJECT SPONSOR is obligated to comply with all applicable provisions of the Alameda CTC Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program, incorporated herein by reference as if attached hereto.

LBCE Program Substitution: The LBCE Program allows substitution of Alameda CTC’s program if a Project Sponsor’s local preference program has been approved in writing by the Alameda CTC’s LBCE Liaison Officer. PROJECT SPONSOR shall obtain approval of any such substitution prior to the advertisement of any procurements potentially eligible for reimbursement under this AGREEMENT.

The following resources are available to guide Project Sponsors through the LBCE Program requirements for procurement and contracting processes:
• Sample template language for professional and construction services contracts is available from ALAMEDA CTC’s website: https://www.alamedactc.org/get-involved/contract-equity • Prime and Subconsultant/Subcontractor Local Business Enterprise, Small Local Business Enterprise and Very Small Local Business Enterprise Utilization Form: https://www.alamedactc.org/getinvolved/contracting-forms/ • The LBCE Program Guidelines, available at the above link, includes a Project Sponsor Responsibility Checklist. Appendix B of the LBCE Program Guidelines identifies the Responsibilities of Sponsor Agencies.
• Direct inquiries about the LBCE Program to ALAMEDA CTC’s LBCE Liaison Officer:

Seung Cho
Director of Contract Services and Operations
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (510) 208-7472
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 101 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix E - Page 1

APPENDIX E

DELIVERABLES AND DUE DATES
Project Deliverables and Due Dates: The Deliverables and Due Dates tables below reflect required deliverables and due dates, if any, for the phases listed in Appendix A-2 Project Phase Descriptions that contain ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS.

Additionally, PROJECT SPONSOR must also submit Request for Reimbursement forms and Progress Reporting as required per Appendix C.

Deliverables and Due Dates
No. Description Due Date to
Alameda CTC
1 Progress Reports
(See Appendix C: Request for Reimbursements and Reporting Requirements) Per Appendix C
Construction
2 Documentation of Insurance Coverage (COI; see Appendix G for minimum insurance requirements for TFCA-funded projects).
03/31/2026 or
with First Invoice,
whichever is earlier
3 Photos of temporary construction signage (which includes the Alameda CTC logo and/or the Air District logo for TFCA funded projects). 07/31/2026
4 Interim TFCA Report 07/31/2026
5 Before and After photos of construction completion. 01/31/2027 6 Confirmation of construction completion.

Ex. Copy of governing board acceptance, notice of completion or similar. 01/31/2027
Final Closeout Deliverables
7 Documentation of completed publicity requirements per Section I.21.

Ex. Funding agency credit/logo usage on websites, articles, and construction signage. 01/31/2027 8 Final Invoice
9 Final TFCA Report
10 Final Alameda CTC Report
Note:
• Per Section III.12 of AGREEMENT, Alameda CTC may withhold payment of reimbursement requests until past due deliverables are received and approved.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 102 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix F – Page 1

APPENDIX F

PROJECT PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Project Performance Measures: The Project Performance Measures and Targets describes what outcomebased performance measure(s) the PROJECT SPONSOR plans to evaluate to ensure that the project/program is meeting its objectives.

Appendix F is Not Applicable.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 103 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 1

APPENDIX G

TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR (TFCA) POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS The contents of Appendix G are only included and attached to this AGREEMENT if TFCA funds are obligated and applicable to AGREEMENT.

Appendix Index
Appendix G-1 TFCA Project Number and “Years of Effectiveness” Appendix G-2 TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies and Insurance Requirements Appendix G-3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) TFCA Logos Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 104 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 2
APPENDIX G-1
TFCA PROJECT NUMBER AND “YEARS OF EFFECTIVENESS”
The PROJECT’s established TFCA Project Number is to be included on all PROJECT reports and invoices.

The PROJECT’s established period for TFCA “Years of Effectiveness” is used by Alameda CTC and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the PROJECT and represents the minimum period of time PROJECT SPONSOR is to maintain and/or operate the PROJECT, per Air District requirements. It is not intended to reflect the number of years a capital project is expected to last.

TFCA Project Number:
• 26ALA19
TFCA “Years of Effectiveness”:
• 7 (seven) years
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 105 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 3
APPENDIX G-2

TFCA COUNTY PROGRAM MANAGER FUND POLICIES AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Note: The referenced documents are available for view and download from Alameda CTC’s TFCA webpage <https://www.alamedactc.org/funding/transportation-fund-for-clean-air>. As incorporated into this AGREEMENT, (i) the term “Air District” in the policies shall be deemed to mean and refer to Bay Area Air Quality Management District, (ii) “Program Manager” shall be deemed to mean and refer to ALAMEDA CTC, and (iii) “GRANTEE” shall be deemed to mean and refer to PROJECT SPONSOR.

AIR DISTRICT-APPROVED TFCA COUNTY PROGRAM MANAGER/40% FUND POLICIES The PROJECT is to be consistent with the AIR DISTRICT’S Board-Adopted Policies Commencing FYE 2026 for the County Program Manager (or 40%) Fund (Appendix D of AIR DISTRICT’s TFCA 40% Fund Expenditure Plan Guidance Commencing Fiscal Year Ending 2026 (“Air District TFCA 40% Guidance”)).

TFCA INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The PROJECT is to comply with the below Alameda CTC insurance requirements for TFCA projects, as well as the Air District’s Insurance Guidelines (Appendix F of Air District TFCA 40% Guidance). • Verification of Coverage
PROJECT SPONSOR is required to provide certificates and/or other evidence of the required insurance coverage prior to the execution of a fund-transfer agreement and annually thereafter throughout and until project completion. Certificates, policies and other evidence provided shall specify that ALAMEDA CTC and the Air District shall receive 30 days advanced notice of cancellation from the insurers.

Additionally, PROJECT SPONSOR is to require all professional services consultants, contractors and subcontractors involved with the PROJECT to name ALAMEDA CTC, its officers, employees and consultants as additional insured on all insurance required by PROJECT SPONSOR for PROJECT. • Minimum Scope of Insurance
Throughout the Term of the AGREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect the Liability Insurance and Property Insurance as set forth below:

1. Liability Insurance: With a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be of the type usual and customary to the business of SPONSOR, and to the operation of the vehicles, vessels, engines or equipment operated by Sponsor.

2. Property Insurance: In an amount of not less than the insurable value of PROJECT SPONSOR’s vehicles, vessels, engines or equipment funded under the Agreement, and covering all risks of loss, damage or destruction of such vehicles, vessels, engines or equipment.

3. Workers Compensation Insurance: As required by California law and employers’ insurance with a limit of not less than $1 million.
• Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A: VII.

ALAMEDA CTC may, at its sole discretion, waive or alter this requirement or accept self-insurance in lieu of any required policy of insurance.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 106 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 4
Air District TFCA 40% Guidance FYE 2026
Appendix F: Insurance Guidelines
This appendix provides guidance on the insurance coverage and documentation typically required for TFCA 40% Fund projects. Note that the Air District reserves the right to specify different types or levels of insurance in the Funding Agreement.

The typical Funding Agreement requires that each Project Sponsor provide documentation showing that they meet the following requirements for each of their projects. The administering agency is not required to meet these requirements itself, unless it is acting as a Project Sponsor.

1. Liability Insurance:

Corporations and Public Entities - a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be of the type usual and customary to the business of the Project Sponsor, and to the operation of the vehicles, engines or equipment operated by the Project Sponsor.

Single Vehicle Owners - a limit of not less than $750,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be of the type usual and customary to the business of the Project Sponsor, and to the operation of the vehicles, engines or equipment operated by the Project Sponsor.

2. Property Insurance:

New Equipment Purchases - an amount of not less than the insurable value of Project Sponsor’s vehicles, engines or equipment funded under this Agreement, and covering all risks of loss, damage or destruction of such vehicles, engines or equipment.

Retrofit Projects - 2003 model year vehicles or engines or newer in an amount of not less than the insurable value of Project Sponsor’s vehicles, engines or equipment funded under this Agreement, and covering all risks of loss, damage or destruction of such vehicles, engines or equipment.

3. Workers Compensation Insurance:

Construction projects – including but not limited to bike/pedestrian paths, bike lanes, smart growth and vehicle infrastructure, as required by California law and employers’ insurance with a limit not less than $1 million.

4. Acceptability of Insurers:

Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A: VII. The Air District may, at its sole discretion, waive or alter this requirement or accept self-insurance in lieu of any required policy of insurance.

The following table lists the type of insurance coverage generally required for each project type. The requirements may differ in specific cases. Administering agencies should contact the Air District liaison with questions, especially about unusual projects. __________________________________________________________________________________ Bay Area Air Quality Management District Transportation Fund for Clean Air – County Program Manager / 40% Fund Page 29 Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 107 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 5
Air District TFCA 40% Guidance FYE 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ Bay Area Air Quality Management District Transportation Fund for Clean Air – County Program Manager / 40% Fund Page 30 Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 108 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 6
APPENDIX G-3

AIR DISTRICT TFCA LOGOS
PROJECT SPONSOR shall comply with all of the publicity requirements to inform the public on the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS on the PROJECT, including TFCA funding, as detailed in the Recitals Section I-21 of this AGREEMENT.
• A link to download Air District’s latest logos is available on Alameda CTC’s TFCA webpage <https://www.alamedactc.org/funding/transportation-fund-for-clean-air>. • Physical decals for bike racks, signal boxes, and vehicles are available upon request to Alameda CTC staff, whose contact information is listed on Alameda CTC’s TFCA webpage.

APPENDIX G

TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR (TFCA) POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS The contents of Appendix G are only included and attached to this AGREEMENT if TFCA funds are obligated and applicable to AGREEMENT.

Appendix Index
Appendix G-1 TFCA Project Number and “Years of Effectiveness” Appendix G-2 TFCA County Program Manager Fund Policies and Insurance Requirements Appendix G-3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) TFCA Logos Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 109 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 7
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 110 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 8
APPENDIX G-1
TFCA PROJECT NUMBER AND “YEARS OF EFFECTIVENESS”
The PROJECT’s established TFCA Project Number is to be included on all PROJECT reports and invoices.

The PROJECT’s established period for TFCA “Years of Effectiveness” is used by Alameda CTC and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the PROJECT and represents the minimum period of time PROJECT SPONSOR is to maintain and/or operate the PROJECT, per Air District requirements. It is not intended to reflect the number of years a capital project is expected to last.

TFCA Project Number:
• 26ALAXX
TFCA “Years of Effectiveness”:
• XX years
Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 111 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 9
APPENDIX G-2

TFCA COUNTY PROGRAM MANAGER FUND POLICIES AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Note: The referenced documents are available for view and download from Alameda CTC’s TFCA webpage <https://www.alamedactc.org/funding/transportation-fund-for-clean-air>. As incorporated into this AGREEMENT, (i) the term “Air District” in the policies shall be deemed to mean and refer to Bay Area Air Quality Management District, (ii) “Program Manager” shall be deemed to mean and refer to ALAMEDA CTC, and (iii) “GRANTEE” shall be deemed to mean and refer to PROJECT SPONSOR.

AIR DISTRICT-APPROVED TFCA COUNTY PROGRAM MANAGER/40% FUND POLICIES The PROJECT is to be consistent with the AIR DISTRICT’S Board-Adopted Policies Commencing FYE 2026 for the County Program Manager (or 40%) Fund (Appendix D of AIR DISTRICT’s TFCA 40% Fund Expenditure Plan Guidance Commencing Fiscal Year Ending 2026 (“Air District TFCA 40% Guidance”)).

TFCA INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The PROJECT is to comply with the below Alameda CTC insurance requirements for TFCA projects, as well as the Air District’s Insurance Guidelines (Appendix F of Air District TFCA 40% Guidance). • Verification of Coverage
PROJECT SPONSOR is required to provide certificates and/or other evidence of the required insurance coverage prior to the execution of a fund-transfer agreement and annually thereafter throughout and until project completion. Certificates, policies and other evidence provided shall specify that ALAMEDA CTC and the Air District shall receive 30 days advanced notice of cancellation from the insurers.

Additionally, PROJECT SPONSOR is to require all professional services consultants, contractors and subcontractors involved with the PROJECT to name ALAMEDA CTC, its officers, employees and consultants as additional insured on all insurance required by PROJECT SPONSOR for PROJECT. • Minimum Scope of Insurance
Throughout the Term of the AGREEMENT, PROJECT SPONSOR shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect the Liability Insurance and Property Insurance as set forth below:

4. Liability Insurance: With a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be of the type usual and customary to the business of SPONSOR, and to the operation of the vehicles, vessels, engines or equipment operated by Sponsor.

5. Property Insurance: In an amount of not less than the insurable value of PROJECT SPONSOR’s vehicles, vessels, engines or equipment funded under the Agreement, and covering all risks of loss, damage or destruction of such vehicles, vessels, engines or equipment.

6. Workers Compensation Insurance: As required by California law and employers’ insurance with a limit of not less than $1 million.
• Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A: VII.

ALAMEDA CTC may, at its sole discretion, waive or alter this requirement or accept self-insurance in lieu of any required policy of insurance.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 112 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 10
Air District TFCA 40% Guidance FYE 2026
Appendix F: Insurance Guidelines
This appendix provides guidance on the insurance coverage and documentation typically required for TFCA 40% Fund projects. Note that the Air District reserves the right to specify different types or levels of insurance in the Funding Agreement.

The typical Funding Agreement requires that each Project Sponsor provide documentation showing that they meet the following requirements for each of their projects. The administering agency is not required to meet these requirements itself, unless it is acting as a Project Sponsor.

1. Liability Insurance:

Corporations and Public Entities - a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be of the type usual and customary to the business of the Project Sponsor, and to the operation of the vehicles, engines or equipment operated by the Project Sponsor.

Single Vehicle Owners - a limit of not less than $750,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be of the type usual and customary to the business of the Project Sponsor, and to the operation of the vehicles, engines or equipment operated by the Project Sponsor.

2. Property Insurance:

New Equipment Purchases - an amount of not less than the insurable value of Project Sponsor’s vehicles, engines or equipment funded under this Agreement, and covering all risks of loss, damage or destruction of such vehicles, engines or equipment.

Retrofit Projects - 2003 model year vehicles or engines or newer in an amount of not less than the insurable value of Project Sponsor’s vehicles, engines or equipment funded under this Agreement, and covering all risks of loss, damage or destruction of such vehicles, engines or equipment.

3. Workers Compensation Insurance:

Construction projects – including but not limited to bike/pedestrian paths, bike lanes, smart growth and vehicle infrastructure, as required by California law and employers’ insurance with a limit not less than $1 million.

4. Acceptability of Insurers:

Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A: VII. The Air District may, at its sole discretion, waive or alter this requirement or accept self-insurance in lieu of any required policy of insurance.

The following table lists the type of insurance coverage generally required for each project type. The requirements may differ in specific cases. Administering agencies should contact the Air District liaison with questions, especially about unusual projects. __________________________________________________________________________________ Bay Area Air Quality Management District Transportation Fund for Clean Air – County Program Manager / 40% Fund Page 29 Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 113 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 11
Air District TFCA 40% Guidance FYE 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ Bay Area Air Quality Management District Transportation Fund for Clean Air – County Program Manager / 40% Fund Page 30 Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 114 of 251
Alameda CTC Agreement No. A25-0065
Project No. 1657007
Appendix G – Page 12
APPENDIX G-3

AIR DISTRICT TFCA LOGOS
PROJECT SPONSOR shall comply with all of the publicity requirements to inform the public on the use of ALAMEDA CTC ADMINISTERED FUNDS on the PROJECT, including TFCA funding, as detailed in the Recitals Section I-21 of this AGREEMENT.
• A link to download Air District’s latest logos is available on Alameda CTC’s TFCA webpage <https://www.alamedactc.org/funding/transportation-fund-for-clean-air>. • Physical decals for bike racks, signal boxes, and vehicles are available upon request to Alameda CTC staff, whose contact information is listed on Alameda CTC’s TFCA webpage.

Docusign Envelope ID: 28FCE92E-2051-4FFA-94BF-DBA544632881 115 of 251
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY ACCEPTING $23,000 FROM THE TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR

CLEAN AIR, ADMINISTERED BY THE ALAMEDA COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR
2025-2026 CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANTS FUND BUDGET, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE PROJECT

FUNDING AGREEMENT, IN A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY

ATTORNEY, FOR THE ARIZONA STREET BIKE BOULEVARD
PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 25-55
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (“Alameda CTC”) administers funding programs for projects and programs that benefit the Alameda County transportation system, consisting of the 2000 Measure B, the 2010 Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), the 2014 Measure BB, the Congestion Management Agency Transportation Improvement Program (“CMA-TIP”), and the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (“TFCA”) Programs, and such funding is collectively defined as, and shall be referenced herein, as the “Alameda CTC Administered Funds”; and
WHEREAS, the Union City Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) Update 2021 identified Arizona Street as a corridor for bicycle infrastructure improvement.

Specifically, the BPMP calls for signing and striping improvements to make the corridor a safe alternative route for bicycling for all ages and abilities.

WHEREAS, on June 13, 2025, Alameda CTC released the Call for Projects for the FY2025-26 Transportation Fund for Clean Air with approximately $789,000 for eligible capital projects and programs within Alameda County. The Call for Projects period ended on July 18, 2025.

WHEREAS, on September 25, 2025, Alameda CTC approved Union City’s Arizona Street Bike Boulevard improvements project, in the amount of $23,000, from the FY 2025- 2026 Transportation Fund for Clean Air Program; and
WHEREAS, funding for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard Project is identified in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Project Plan; however, this opportunity for additional funding through the TFCA Program allows for increased flexibility in project design and construction; and
WHEREAS, the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Project Plan includes $400,000 in funding for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard project within FY 2025-2026. ; and
Union City Project No. 25-55
Arizona Street Bike Boulevard
FY 2025-2026
Adopted Budget
251-SB 1 Road Maint & Rehab Fund $300,000
267-Measure BB Bike & Ped Fund $100,000
Total $400,000
116 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Accept $23,000 from Alameda CTC for Arizona Street Bike Boulevard

WHEREAS, Union City will receive the additional $23,000 in funding through the Alameda CTC Project Funding Agreement (PFA) No. A25-0065 for the Union City Arizona Street Bike Boulevard Project, City Project No. 25-55. City Council action is necessary to amend the FY 2025 -2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund budget; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby accepts $23,000 from the Alameda County Transportation Commission via Project Funding Agreement No. A25-0065 and authorizes the use of those funds for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard Project; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby amends the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund revenue budget by increasing the revenue projection in Account Number 410-92555-44502 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Arizona Street Bike Boulevard – Misc. County/Local Grants) by $23,000; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby amends the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund expenditure budget by appropriating $23,000 to Account Number 410-92555-57112 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Arizona Street Bike Boulevard – Land Improvements); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby authorizes the City Manager to sign Alameda CTC PFA No. A25-0056, which awards a grant in the amount of $23,000 to the City for the Arizona Street Bike Boulevard, City Project No. 25-55, in a form approved by the City Attorney. 117 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Accept $23,000 from Alameda CTC for Arizona Street Bike Boulevard

118 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Accept $23,000 from Alameda CTC for Arizona Street Bike Boulevard

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
119 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 2 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.6
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Waive Further Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Amending Union City Municipal Code Section 2.21.020 “Creation – Membership” to Add a Third Alternate Commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council waive further reading and adopt the proposed ordinance amending Union City Municipal Code Section 2.21.020 to increase the number of Park and Recreation Commission alternates from two (2) to three (3). The City Council introduced the proposed ordinance at its January 27, 2026 meeting.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
• Goal B – Governance and Organizational Effectiveness: Strengthens governance capacity by ensuring advisory bodies can maintain participation and continuity. • Goal E – Communication and Outreach: Supports civic participation by expanding opportunities for residents to serve.

BACKGROUND
The Park and Recreation Commission advises the City Council on the recreational needs of Union City residents. The Commission currently includes two (2) alternate positions. At its January 27, 2026 meeting, the City Council waived full reading and introduced by title only an ordinance to add one additional alternate seat to the Commission. The City Council must now vote to adopt the ordinance.

DISCUSSION
This item is a structural update to add one additional alternate seat on the Park and Recreation Commission by amending UCMC Section 2.21.020. The ordinance is exempt from further environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.
120 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.6
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 2 February 10, 2026 If the City Council adopts the ordinance, the Mayor may subsequently bring forward an appointment to fill the newly created alternate seat for City Council concurrence as part of the overall appointments process.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with adopting this ordinance.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council waive further reading and adopt an ordinance amending Union City Municipal Code Section 2.21.020 “Creation – Membership” to add a third alternate commissioner position to the Park and Recreation Commission.

Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – January 27, 2026 City Council Staff Report

2. Proposed Ordinance
121 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 2 January 27, 2026
Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 4.2
DATE: January 27, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Waive Full Reading and Introduce By Title Only An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Union City Amending Section 2.21.020 “Creation - Membership” of the Union City Municipal Code to Add a Third Alternate Commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council consider waiving full reading and introducing by title only an ordinance amending the Union City Municipal Code to add one additional Alternate Commissioner position to the Park and Recreation Commission (the “Commission”). The City’s current Boards, Commissions, and Committees roster reflects two (2) Commission alternate seats; this ordinance would authorize a third alternate seat to support continuity of Commission operations and provide additional flexibility when regular members are unavailable.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
• Goal B – Governance and Organizational Effectiveness: Strengthens governance capacity by ensuring advisory bodies can maintain participation and continuity. • Goal E – Communication and Outreach: Supports civic participation by expanding opportunities for residents to serve.

BACKGROUND
The Commission advises the City Council on the recreational needs of Union City residents. The Commission currently includes two alternate positions. Following the City’s recent recruitment and interviews, the Mayor has indicated interest in filling more than two alternate roles; however, the Municipal Code currently authorizes only two alternate seats. This ordinance would add a third alternate position, allowing the Mayor to appoint an additional alternate, with Council concurrence, when desired.

For administrative consistency, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-029, which standardizes the term start and end dates for new appointments to commence on 122 of 251
Agenda Item No. 4.2
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 2 January 27, 2026
January 1 and expire on December 31 of the final year of the term. The resolution does not itself create seats, but will apply to future appointments to any newly created alternate position.

DISCUSSION
This item is limited to a structural update: creating an additional alternate seat on the Commission. If the ordinance is adopted, the Mayor may subsequently bring forward an appointment after the effective date of the ordinance to fill the new alternate seat for City Council concurrence as part of the overall appointments process. Any new appointment to the additional alternate seat will follow the standardized term framework established by Resolution No. 2025-029.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with introducing and adopting this ordinance.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council consider waiving full reading and introducing by title only an ordinance amending the Union City Municipal Code to add one additional Alternate Commissioner position to the Park and Recreation Commission.

Prepared by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Submitted by: Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
Attachments

1. Proposed Ordinance
123 of 251
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY AMENDING SECTION 2.21.020 “CREATION - MEMBERSHIP” OF THE

UNION CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A THIRD ALTERNATE

COMMISSIONER TO THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Union City has established the Park and Recreation Commission to advise the City Council on matters related to parks and recreational programs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide additional flexibility and continuity in Park and Recreation Commission participation by authorizing an additional Alternate Commissioner position; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance amends the Union City Municipal Code to increase the number of Alternate Commissioners permitted to serve on the Park and Recreation Commission from two (2) to three (3).

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals (“Recitals”) are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. CEQA. Approval of the amendments is exempt from further environmental review under the general rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. As a series of text amendments and additions, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 3. Municipal Code Amendments. Union City Municipal Code Section

2.21.020 is hereby amended to read as follows (replacements in bold; deletions in strikethrough):

Section 2.21.020. Creation—Membership. There is created in the City a City Park and Recreation Commission to consist of five members plus two up to three alternates which shall be designated as the Park and Recreation Commission of the City.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable.
124 of 251
Ordinance No. 2026-XXX
Adding a Third Alternate Commissioner to the Parks and Recreation Commission

SECTION 5. Publication and effective date. Within fifteen (15) days from and after adoption, this Ordinance shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in Alameda County and circulated in the City of Union City, in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Union City held on January 27, 2026, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
125 of 251
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 3 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 5.1
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs, Annual Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter, and Ramp Repair Project, City Project No. 25-03

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the December 16, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to explore options that would further underwrite the sidewalk repair costs to reduce the property owners’ contribution to the Annual Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter, and Ramp Repair Project, City Project No. 25-03. Staff is presenting three options for the City Council’s consideration. The City Council could select one of the three alternatives, identify a fourth alternative, or make no changes to the formula for cost recovery for the sidewalk repair program. Any alternative will require staff to return to the City Council for formal action.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is aligned with the following:

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
Under the State Streets and Highways Code Section 5610, the owners of lots that front a public street are responsible for the maintenance of the public sidewalk. This responsibility is reflected in the Union City Municipal Code, Section 12.08.615.

Historically, the City has sponsored a sidewalk repair and replacement program and shared repair costs with property owners. The City pays for mobilization, curb and gutter repair, and tree removal (if necessary). The property owners pay for the demolition of the old sidewalk, site preparation, and the concrete for the new sidewalk. The City funds the project up front and seeks reimbursement from property owners for their sidewalk repair costs after project closeout. Repayment options of up to 12 months are typically offered.

Any outstanding balances at the end of the repayment period are subject to a lien being placed on the property.

Most recently, on August 12, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-116, 126 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.1
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 February 10, 2026 awarding a construction contract to Rosas Brothers Construction in the amount of $539,954 and approving a total construction budget, including contingency, of $647,945 for the Annual Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter, and Ramp Repair Project, City Project No. 25-

03. The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget was $700,000, so the construction budget was well within the planned expenditures
On December 16, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-173 accepting completion of the Annual Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter, and Ramp Repair Project, City Project No. 25-03. The final construction cost was $611,523, $36,422 below the construction budget and $88,477 below the CIP budget.

For City Project No. 25-03, total City costs are $333,177, and the property owners' share is $278,346. Although the project was initially funded using 100% City funds — including State Gas Tax, Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation, and Measure BB funds — the reimbursements collected from property owners would be used to support future CIP projects. Future projects may include, but are not limited to, future sidewalk repairs, bike lane improvements, and pavement projects.

Due to the unprecedented economic environment and rising material and labor costs, the project costs were approximately 75% higher than those of the most recently completed sidewalk repair project in 2022. At the December 16, 2025, City Council meeting, staff recommended that the remaining project balance of $36,422 be used to offset the property owners’ sidewalk repair costs on a proportional basis. City Council directed staff to explore additional underwriting options, beyond the $36,422 remaining balance, including a 50% underwriting option for the property owners’ sidewalk repair costs.

Additionally, at the December 2025 meeting, staff recommended extending the repayment period from 12 to 18 months to reduce property owners’ monthly payments.

DISCUSSION
Per the City Council’s direction, City staff explored three different options to underwrite the property owners’ sidewalk repair costs. The first option uses the remaining construction budget of $36,422, which would provide a 13% discount. The second option uses the remaining CIP budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 of $88,477, which would provide a 31.5% discount. The third option explores a 50% discount as requested by the City Council.

The table below compares the different discount options for the property owners. Option 1 (13% discount) and Option 2 (31.5% discount) do not require additional funds to be appropriated. Option 3, the 50% discount, will require an additional $50,696 in City Council appropriation, as the total underwriting amount exceeds the CIP budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Option 3 would require redirecting transportation funds from other CIP projects.
127 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.1
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 3 February 10, 2026 128 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.1
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 3 February 10, 2026 Current Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Discount 0% 13% 31.5% 50%
Underwrite Amount -- $36,000 $87,500 $139,173
Median Cost per property owner $2,025 $1,762 $1,387 $1,012 Highest Cost $8,302 $7,223 $5,687 $4,151
Lowest Cost $480 $418 $329 $240

FISCAL IMPACT
The Annual Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter, and Ramp Repair Project, City Project No. 25- 03, was funded by a combination of State Gas Tax funds (Fund 250), SB 1 Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation funds (Fund 251), and Measure BB Bike & Pedestrian funds (Fund 267), for a total of $611,523. The Fiscal Year 2025-2026 CIP budget allocated $700,000 for this project, which was sufficient to cover the construction costs upfront. The property owners’ shared costs, estimated at $278,345, are collected after the project closeout.

Options 1 through 3 would reduce the amount of shared costs collected from the property owners and would correspondingly increase the City’s portion of the total project costs.

Options 1 and 2 utilize the construction budget and CIP budget savings, respectively.

However, these savings would typically be returned to the fund balance and redirected to future transportation CIP projects. Option 3 would similarly redirect the budget savings and appropriate an additional $50,696 that would otherwise be available to fund other CIP transportation projects.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive the presentation and provide direction regarding the three underwriting options for property owners’ sidewalk repair costs. The City Council could select one of the three alternatives, identify a fourth alternative, or make no changes to the formula for cost recovery for the sidewalk repair program, Annual Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter, and Ramp Repair Project, City Project No. 25-03.

Prepared by: Diana Cangco, City Engineer
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. PowerPoint Presentation
129 of 251
Underwriting Options for
Sidewalk Repair Costs
City Project No. 25-03 – Annual Sidewalk, Curb &
Gutter, and Ramp Repair
2 Project BackgroundCity Council Project Approvals and DirectionUnderwriting Options (Discounts of 13%, 31.5%, 50%)Recommendations/Feedback Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
Presentation Overview
3 § 12.08.615 Sidewalk maintenance—Duty and liability. Section A, Section D ”Duty of Property Owners. The owners of lots or portions of lots fronting on any portion of a public street…shall maintain any sidewalk in such condition that the sidewalk will not endanger persons or property and maintain it in a condition which will not interfere with the public convenience…” “Maintenance and Repair. For purposes of this section, "maintenance and repair" on sidewalk areas shall include removal and replacement of sidewalks, removal and filling or replacement of parking strips… ”
(Ord. 365-91 § 1, 1991)
Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
Project Background - Municipal Code
4 Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
Project Background – Project Funding
•CIP Budget FY 2025-2026 - $700,000• Funds
• State Gas Tax
• SB 1 Road Maintenance and Rehab Fund•Measure BB Bike and Ped Fund • Per Municipal Code, property owners pay
100% of their share of repair costs
5 Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
City Council Project Approvals and Direction
Cost
Original Project Budget (25-26 CIP) $700,000Approved Project Cost + 20% Contingency $647,945Actual Cost of Work + Used Contingency $611,523Approved Budget Unused: $36,422 • August 12, 2025 - City Council awarded the Construction Contract and approved a total construction budget of $647,945.
• December 16, 2025 - City Council accepted the completion of the project with a final construction cost of $611,523 (City Cost: $333,177 Homeowners’ Costs: $278,346) • The remaining project budget was $36,422.• December 16, 2025 - City Council also directed staff to look at different underwriting options to offset the increased costs for property owners, including a 50% discount option. 6 Cost Increases from 2022 to 2025• General Project Costs: Approx. 85% cost increase for similar number of locations.
• Sidewalk Unit Costs: 78% cost increase for removal and replacement of sidewalk per square foot.
• Resident Portion Cost: 75% increase in median cost per homeowner 2022 vs.
2025 Cost
Increase
City Proj. 25-03
(Completed:
2025)
City Proj. 20-03
(Completed:
2022)
Total Contract Cost $327,500 $611,523 +86%
Private Locations 93 114 -
$16.82 /sf $30 /sf +78% Sidewalk Replacement Cost per Square Foot $1,080 $2,025 +75% Median Homeowner Portion
Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
City Council Direction - Cost Comparison (2022 vs. 2025) 7 Option 1: 13% Discount (Use of
Remaining Project Budget)
• Amount to Underwrite: $36,000• Median Cost per homeowner: $1,762• Highest Cost: $7,223• Lowest Cost: $418• City Cost: $369,177• Homeowners’ Cost: $242,346 Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
Underwriting Options
*Without a discount, the current Median Cost per homeowner is $2,025Highest Cost: $8,302Lowest Cost: $480 $647,945 - $611,523 = $36,422
8 Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
Underwriting Options
Option 2: 31.5% Discount (Use of
Remaining Project Budget Plus the Delta from CIP Budget of $700,000) • Amount to Underwrite: $87,500• Median Cost per homeowner: $1,387• Highest Cost: $5,687• Lowest Cost: $329• City Cost: $420,677• Homeowners’ Cost: $190,846 $700,000 - $611,523 = $88,477
*Without a discount, the current Median Cost per homeowner is $2,025Highest Cost: $8,302Lowest Cost: $480 9 Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
Underwriting Options
Option 3: 50% Discount
• Amount to Underwrite: $139,173• Median Cost per homeowner: $1,012• Highest Cost: $4,151• Lowest Cost: $240• City Cost: $472,350• Homeowners’ Cost: $139,173 Total Resident Costs $278,346 x 50%
= $139,173
*Without a discount, the current Median Cost per homeowner is $2,025Highest Cost: $8,302Lowest Cost: $480 10 Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs• Funding and Cost Recovery Approach

SAVINGS CITY COSTS

PROPERTY
OWNERS’
COST
PROJECT COST = $611,523
$333,177 $278,346

CIP BUDGET

CONSTRUCTION BUDGET
$369,177 $242,346
$420,677 $190,846
$472,350 $139,173
OPTION 1 USE $36,000 SAVINGSOPTION 2 USE $87,500 SAVINGS OPTION 3 USE $88,477 SAVINGS + DIVERT $50,696 FUNDS
SAVINGS AND PROPERTY OWNERS’ COSTS REIMBURSES GAS TAX, SB1, MEASURE BB FUNDS TO USE FOR OTHER CIP ROADWAY PROJECTS $36,422 - $88,477
11 Underwriting Options for Sidewalk Repair Costs
Recommendations / Feedback
• Resident Payment Options:
• One-Time Payment• Monthly Payment Option of 18 months at 0% Interest (Typical 12 months)
• Property Lien (remaining amount owed after 18 months) • Questions / Recommendations
City Council Staff Report Page 1 of 5 February 10, 2026 Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 5.2
DATE: February 10, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joan Malloy, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Accepting $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Increasing the Revenue Projection in the Capital Projects Grants Fund by $16,728,000, and Appropriating the $16,728,000 to the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), increasing the revenue projections in the Capital Projects Fund by $16,728,000, and appropriating the $16,728,000 to the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This agenda item is in alignment with the following:

Goal C, Strategy 2: Economic, Community Development, and Public Safety – Facilitate the build-out of the greater Station District Area through the construction of the Quarry Lakes Parkway, completion of the pedestrian rail crossing, and implementation of the recommendations of the Southern Alameda County Regional Rail Integration Study to make the Station District a passenger rail hub served by ACE.

Goal D, Strategy 2: Environmental Sustainability and Infrastructure – Implement the City’s capital improvement plan.

BACKGROUND
MTC, a regional planning agency, has been designated as the federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the state Regional Transportation Agency (“RTPA”) for the San Francisco Bay Area. At designated times, MTC receives available regional, state, and federal funds as an MPO and RTPA, and, in turn, provides these funds to local agencies for planning and programming transportation, transit, land use, or other projects 141 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 5 February 10, 2026 relevant to MTC or its statutory purposes (the “Project” or “Projects”).

SB 595 (Chapter 650, Statutes 2017), commonly referred to as Regional Measure 3 (RM 3), identified projects eligible to receive funding under the Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan. Voters in 2018 approved the Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan (RM 3) to finance $4.45 billion for highways and transit improvements through an increase of tolls of $1.00 on the region’s seven (7) state-owned toll bridges, including the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge, the Dumbarton Bridge, the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, the Benicia-Martinez Bridge, the Carquinez Bridge and the Antioch Bridge.

MTC is responsible for funding projects eligible for RM 3 funds, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 30914.7(a) and (c), and the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) is the sponsor of the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program project in the RM 3 Expenditure Plan.

The Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan identifies corridor improvements under Corridor-Specific Capital Projects. Under the South (San Mateo-Hayward, Dumbarton) list of projects, $130 million has been programmed for the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements
The statute description for the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements states:
“Funding planning, environmental review, design and construction of capital improvements with the Dubarton Bridge and rail corridors in the Counties of Alameda and San Mateo to relieve congestion, increase person throughput, and offer reliable travel times. Eligible projects include, but are not limited to, the projects recommended in the Dumbarton Corridor Transportation Study and improvements to facilitate rail and transit connectivity among the Altamont Commuter Express, Capitol Corridor, and Bay Area Rapid Transit, including rail connection at the Shinn Station. The project sponsors are the Bay Area Toll Authority, Alameda County Transportation Commission, San Mateo County Transit District, and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority.” The Quarry Lakes Parkway Project meets the statute language for the RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvements program funds. Also, the project is identified in Alameda CTC’s Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) and MTC’s Plan Bay Area (PBA) 2050 Plus.

The Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program – Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, was eligible for consideration in the RM 3 Expenditure Plan, as identified in California Streets and Highways Code Section 30914.7(a).

On June 24, 2024, MTC unanimously approved the staff recommendation for programming $130.0 million to projects in Alameda and San Mateo County and approved Resolution No. 4411 for the Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program. With the award of $28.0 million to Union City projects, $25.0 million for Quarry Lakes Parkway, and $3.0 million for the Union City BART East Entrance and At-Grade Crossing. 142 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 2 of 5 February 10, 2026 143 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 3 of 5 February 10, 2026

DISCUSSION
On July 8, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-097, authorizing the City Manager to submit an Allocation Request for $25.0 million to MTC for the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program and accepting Alameda County Transportation Commission’s designation of the City of Union City as the Implementing Agency for the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04.

On September 25, 2025, the City Council received a report on the Revised Funding Allocation Request to MTC from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04, see Exhibit A for Presentation.

On December 11, 2025, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) approved Resolution No. 25-009 Designating the City of Union City as the Implementing Agency for the Subproject of the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project–Quarry Lakes Parkway Project (RM 3 Subproject #17.5), see Exhibit B for Alameda CTC Resolution.

On December 17, 2025, MTC approved Resolution No. 4660 for the allocation of Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement project (RM 3 Project#17) sponsored by Bay Area Toll Authority, Alameda County Transportation Commission, San Mateo County Transit District and the San Mateo Transportation Authority and includes allocation of $16.73 million in RM 3 funds to the City of Union City for the construction of Quarry Lakes Parkway Project (RM 3 Project #17.5), see Attachment 1 for MTC RM 3 Project Summaries and Exhibit C for MTC Resolution. The approved allocation for Quarry Lakes Parkway (QLP), RM 3 Project #17.5 in the amount of $16,728,000 is summarized below:

MTC Allocation for RM 3 Subproject #17.5
Quarry Lakes Parkway Project
QLP, Phase 1 Final Design $2,578,000
QLP, Phase 1A-Temporary Bus Facility Construction 1,000,000 QLP, Phase 2, Right of Way 150,000
QLP, Phases 1-4, Off-Site Mitigation Construction 13,000,000 Total $16,728,000
The remaining $8,272,000 of the $25.0 million in RM 3 funds programmed for the construction of Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1, will be approved as part of a future allocation request.

On January 27, 2026, Public Works received the approved Allocation of RM 3 Funds for FY 2025-26 Letter #01 from MTC for Quarry Lakes Parkway, totaling $3,728,000 for Quarry Lakes Parkway (RM 3 Project #17.5) for Phase 1 Final Design ($2,578,000), Phase 1A -Temporary Bus Facility Construction on Block 6 ($1,000,000) and Phase 2, Right of Way ($150,000), see Exhibit D.
144 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 5 February 10, 2026 On the same day, Public Works received the approved Allocation of Regional Measure 3 (RM 3) Funds for FY 2025-26 Letter #02 from MTC in the amount of $13,000,000 for Quarry Lakes Parkway (RM 3 Project #17.5) for the Offsite Mitigation Construction for Phases 1-4 within Union City, see Exhibit E.

The acceptance of the new RM 3 funds for QLP, Phase 1 Final Design will be followed by a separate City Council resolution to authorize the City Manager the Fifth Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, inc. to increase their contract amount by $2,578,000 to complete the Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for advertisement and award in 2027.

FISCAL IMPACT
Union City will receive $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program grant funds for Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, and these funds will be accounted for in the Capital Projects Grants Fund (Fund 410).

This will be in addition to the $6,270,000 adopted by the City Council for FY 2025-2026, detailed below:

Union City Project No. 18-04
Quarry Lakes Parkway (Phases 1-4)
FY 2025-2026
Adopted Budget
Fund 250-State Gas Tax Fund $100,000
Fund 251-SB 1 Road Maint & Rehab Fund 500,000
Fund 264-Measure BB (2014) Fund 200,000
Fund 266-DIPSA Development Fund 100,000
Fund 267-Measure BB Bike & Ped Fund 75,000
Fund 410-Capital Projects Grants Fund 3,995,000
Fund 416-Public Improvements Fund 1,300,000
Total $6,270,000
City Council action is necessary to amend the Capital Projects Grants Fund (Fund 410) budget for FY 2025-2026, as detailed below and in the attached resolution, as a result of accepting this additional funding.

There is no impact on the General Fund.
145 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 4 of 5 February 10, 2026 146 of 251
Agenda Item No. 5.2
City Council Staff Report Page 5 of 5 February 10, 2026

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Accepting $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and authorizing the use of those funds for the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04; and

2. Amending the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Funds revenue budget by increasing the revenue projection in Account Number 410-91804-44502 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Quarry Lakes Parkway Project – Misc. County/Local Grants) by $16,728,000; and

3. Amending the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund expenditure budget by appropriating an additional $16,728,000 to Account Number 410-91804-57128 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Quarry Lakes Parkway Project – Street Improvements) for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04.

Prepared by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Submitted by: Marilou Ayupan, Public Works Director
Attachments

1. Attachment 1 – MTC RM3 Project Summaries

2. Draft Resolution

3. Exhibit A – September 25, 2025 Presentation

4. Exhibit B – Alameda CTC Reso No. 2025-097

5. Exhibit C– MTC Resolution No. 4660

6. Exhibit D – MTC Allocation Letter #01

7. Exhibit E – MTC Allocation Letter #02
147 of 251
Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3b-25-1487 December 10, 2025 Attachment B

December 2025 Recommended RM3 Allocations – Project Summaries RM3 Project 5 – Ferry Enhancement Program
RM3 provides $300 million in toll funds to RM3 Project 5, Ferry Enhancement Program. This RM3 programmatic category funds the purchase of new vessels, upgrading and rehabilitating existing vessels, building facilities and landside improvements, and upgrading existing facilities of the San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA). Two allocations are proposed under this category this month for Universal Charging Floats that support WETA’s Rapid Electric Emission-Free (REEF) Ferry Program. These charging floats are an alternative to shoreside infrastructure, and will house high-speed charging equipment (up to 6 MW DC), lithium-ion battery storage, and power conversion systems within a float structure compatible with five different electric vessel types under procurement:

RM3 #5.7 WETA - Downtown San Francisco Gate G Universal Charging Float Project ($10.27 million) 
The Project will construct an electrified Universal Charging Float (UCF) at SF Bay Ferry’s Downtown San Francisco Terminal (Gate G).

The UCF will enable high-speed charging for new zero-emission electric ferries serving Mission Bay, Treasure Island, and expanded East Bay routes, and will reduce the need for shoreside infrastructure which often faces property and environmental restrictions. The float will integrate vessel charging towers, battery energy storage, and power conversion systems within a redesigned structure to support sustained electric ferry operations.

Total project costs are estimated to be $30 million, funded by RM3, FTA, and TIRCP funds. Full project construction is estimated to be completed in late 2029. The UCF will be the first of its kind in the United States.

RM3 #5.8 WETA - Seaplane Ferry Terminal Universal Charging Float (UCF) Project ($16.19 million)
This project will construct an electrified Universal Charging Float (UCF) at the Alameda Seaplane Terminal to enable zero-emission ferry service between Alameda and 148 of 251
Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3b-25-1487 December 10, 2025 Attachment B

Downtown San Francisco. Opportunity charging at the terminal is essential for sustained electric ferry operations, and the required infrastructure cannot be accommodated onshore, necessitating a redesign and replacement of the existing float.

Total project cost is $28.4 million, funded by RM3, FTA, CA Energy Commission, and Alameda County Measure BB, with construction completion anticipated in late 2029.

RM3 Project 10 - MUNI Fleet Expansion and Facilities Projects RM3 provides $140 million in toll funds to RM3 Project 10, MUNI Fleet Expansion and Facilities. This RM3 programmatic category funds replacement and expansion of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s MUNI vehicle fleet and associated facilities. One allocation under this category is proposed this month:

RM3 #10.1 SFMTA – Potrero Modernization Project ($42.39 million) The Potrero Modernization Project will replace SFMTA’s 100+ year-old Potrero Yard at 2500 Mariposa Street with a modern facility designed for an all-electric trolley bus fleet and future transition to battery-electric buses (BEBs). The existing yard, built in 1915 and last upgraded in 1950, currently services 153 trolley buses; the new facility will expand capacity to 213 buses and support operator training programs. This project is part of SFMTA’s Building Progress Program, which aims to maximize property use through joint development, supporting City housing policies and SFMTA revenue goals for transit and other transportation services.

Construction completion is anticipated in mid-2030. The current estimate for the design and construction of the bus yard is $580 million borne by the developer in year of expenditure dollars. This project is being delivered under a public-private partnership and is currently under a predevelopment agreement. SFMTA anticipates entering into a project agreement with the developer in early 2026, followed by Financial Close, and the preconstruction “notice to proceed”. At Financial Close, a Milestone 1 payment of approximately $65 million would be due. The requested $42.4 million in RM3 funds would go toward this Milestone 1 payment, with local, state, and federal sources covering the balance.
149 of 251
Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3b-25-1487 December 10, 2025 Attachment B

See detailed timeline for project phases below.
• Predevelopment Agreement (November 2022-Current): SFMTA and Lead Developer entered into a Predevelopment Agreement, under which the Lead Developer must perform certain predevelopment work at its own expense, including securing Project entitlements and reaching financial close for Project Agreement to procced with construction of the Bus Yard by mid-2030. • Design-Build-Finance Project Agreement (February 2026): SFMTA will enter into a Design-Build-Finance Project Agreement with a lead infrastructure developer via Public-Private-Partnership delivery mechanism, where the developer will be responsible for design and construction of the facility. • Milestone Payment 1 (March 2026): Assumed at $65M, paid at Financial Closing and initiates preconstruction of the design-build scope under the terms of the Design-Build-Finance Project Agreement for the bus yard through late 2027.

This preconstruction period will advance the bus yard design and lead into the construction phase of the project. Final amount may vary and will be confirmed before Commercial Closing.
• Milestone Payment 2 (FY2030): Assumed at $200M, paid in FY2030, contingent on meeting Project Agreement performance requirements of developer completing project construction.
• Annual Payments (FY2032): Assumed at $27M annually in nominal dollars, over a 30-year term (FY2032–FY2062). SFMTA will pay remainder of debt service following construction completion via annual project payments beginning in FY2032 for a 30-year term under Project Agreement. Inclusive of these payments, the total nominal dollar expenditure toward this project through 2062 is projected at $1.6 billion.

The project also enables the proposed Bryant Street Housing Project (~100 units), contingent on bus yard construction start.

RM3 Project 17 - Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project 150 of 251
Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3b-25-1487 December 10, 2025 Attachment B

RM3 provides $130 million in toll funds to the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project. This RM3 programmatic category funds planning, environmental review, design, and construction of capital improvements within Dumbarton Bridge and rail corridor in the Counties of Alameda and San Mateo to relieve congestion, increase person throughput, and offer reliable travel times.

Eligible projects include, but are not limited to, the projects recommended in the Dumbarton Corridor Transportation Study and improvements to facilitate rail and transit connectivity among the Altamont Corridor Express, Capitol Corridor, and Bay Area Rapid Transit District, including a rail connection at Shinn Station. The project sponsors are the Bay Area Toll Authority, Alameda County Transportation Commission, the San Mateo County Transit District, and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority. In June 2024, MTC approved initial programming of this category through MTC Resolution No. 4411, Revised. One allocation under this category is proposed this month:

RM3 #17.5 City of Union City – Quarry Lakes Parkway Project ($16.73 million) The Quarry Lakes Parkway project will build a four-lane multimodal street with a landscaped median, buffered Class II bike lanes, and a continuous Class I multi-use trail, creating a gateway to Quarry Lakes Regional Park and improving safe access to Union City BART for Fremont and Union City residents. The full project includes three gradeseparated underpasses to eliminate delays at two active railroad crossings, provides a critical secondary route parallel to Decoto Road, reducing congestion enhancing transit reliability for Dumbarton Express, AC Transit, and UC Transit.

This complex project involves multiple phases delivered concurrently to expedite completion. RM3 allocations support Union City’s approach to advance ready-to-go components (see Figure 1 below):
• Phase 1 – $46 million estimated total cost for the 7th Street Connection (Between 7th Street and Mission Boulevard (Route 238). An allocation of $2.58 million in RM3 funds is recommended this month for final design of new roadway, including buffered bike lanes and transit stops, to be completed in early 2030. o Phase 1A - $4.4 million total cost for Corporation Yard (Block 6 Lot). An allocation of $1 million in RM3 funds is recommended this month for 151 of 251
Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3b-25-1487 December 10, 2025 Attachment B

construction of an interim bus storage for Union’s City Corp Yard starting in 2026 and ending in 2027 to maintain transit fleet operations during Phase 1 construction.
• Phase 2 – $53 million total cost for the Gateway Connection (Old Alameda Creek to Alvarado-Niles Road).
o An allocation of $150,000 in RM3 funds is recommended this month for early right-of-way activities such as gaining permits.
o A future RM3 allocation recommendation of $8.27 million will be considered for construction of new roadway, including buffered bike lanes and transit stops. Phase 2 completed final design, and this phase will be constructed first to minimize environmental impacts. Completion is expected in 2029.
• Offsite Mitigation Phase – $13 million total cost. An allocation of $13 million in RM3 funds is recommended this month for habitat management and mitigation site design, construction and maintenance. Completion is expected in early 2027 and is required prior to Phase 2 construction.
• Phase 3 – $102 million estimated total cost for the 11th Street Connection (11th Street 7th Street). Design is 35% completed and is estimated to be completed in 2032. • Phase 4 – total costs are estimated at $114 million with a not determined completion date.
152 of 251
Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3b-25-1487 December 10, 2025 Attachment B

Figure 1. Union City Quarry Lakes Parkway Project. Please note that phase 5 has been dropped but could be a future project.

Phases 1, 1A, 2, and mitigation—totaling nearly $113 million—are fully funded and will be completed by 2030, providing independent utility and enabling future phases. Full project costs, including Phases 3 and 4, exceed $327 million. The project was unanimously approved by ACTC’s Programs and Projects Committee on Nov 10, 2025, and was agendized for final approval by the ACTC Commission on Dec 4, 2025.

RM3 Project 25 – Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvements Program RM3 provides $210 million in toll funds to RM3 Project 25, the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvements Program. This RM3 category funds eastbound and westbound improvements in the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge corridor. Two allocations under this category are proposed this month:
153 of 251
Programming and Allocations Committee Agenda Item 3b-25-1487 December 10, 2025 Attachment B

RM3 #25.6 City of Richmond, Richmond Wellness Trail Phase II Project ($2.5 million)
The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) and the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA) are included as project sponsors for RM3 Project 25, and both have designated the City of Richmond as the implementing agency for RM3 Project 25.6, the Richmond Wellness Trail Phase II project. This project will construct the second phase of the Richmond Wellness Trail, creating a continuous connection from the Richmond BART/Amtrak Station to the San Francisco Bay Trail and linking neighborhoods south of Cutting Boulevard to the Richmond Greenway Trail. Improvements include a road diet on Marina Way South, new Class IV cycle tracks and buffered bikeways, planting strips and trees, bus boarding islands, railroad crossing upgrades, and wayfinding signs.

Richmond requests allocation of $2.5 million in RM3 funds for the construction phase, with construction anticipated to begin in early 2026.

RM3 #25.7 City of Richmond Neighborhood Complete Streets Project ($7.5 million) The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) and the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA) are included as project sponsors for RM3 Project 25, and both have designated the City of Richmond as the implementing agency for RM3 Project 25.7, Neighborhood Complete Streets Project. This project will improve safe pedestrian and bicycle connectivity from Richmond’s Iron Triangle neighborhood to the Richmond Ferry Terminal while also enhancing key streets that link to the Richmond Wellness Trail and regional bikeways. Improvements include road diets, new Class IV bike lanes, upgraded railroad crossings, traffic signal upgrades, ADA-compliant sidewalks, bus stop enhancements, storm drain facilities, tree planting, and pedestrian-scale lighting.

Richmond requests allocation of $7.5 million in RM3 funds for the construction phase, with construction anticipated to begin in December 2026. 154 of 251
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY ACCEPTING $16,728,000 FROM THE REGIONAL MEASURE 3

DUMBARTON CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OF THE

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, INCREASING

THE REVENUE PROJECTIONS IN THE CAPITAL PROJECTS GRANTS
FUND BY $16,728,000, AND APPROPRIATING THE $16,728,000 TO THE QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 18-
04 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), a regional planning agency, has been designated as the federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the state Regional Transportation Agency (“RTPA”) for the San Francisco Bay Area; and
WHEREAS, at designated times, MTC receives available regional, state, and federal funds as an MPO and RTPA and provides these funds to local agencies for planning and programming transportation, transit, land use, or other projects relevant to MTC or its statutory purposes (the “Project” or “Projects”); and WHEREAS, SB 595 (Chapter 650, Statutes 2017), commonly referred to as Regional Measure 3 (RM 3), identified projects eligible to receive funding under the Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan. Voters in 2018 approved the Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan (RM 3) to finance $4.45 billion for highways and transit improvements through an increase of tolls of $1.00 on the region’s seven (7) state-owned toll bridges, including the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge, the Dumbarton Bridge, the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, the Benicia-Martinez Bridge, the Carquinez Bridge and the Antioch Bridge; and
WHEREAS, MTC is responsible for funding projects eligible for RM 3 funds, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 30914.7(a) and (c); and WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) is the sponsor of the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program project in the RM 3 Expenditure Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program – Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, was eligible for consideration in the RM 3 Expenditure Plan, as identified in California Streets and Highways Code Section 30914.7(a); and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2024, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) unanimously approved the staff recommendation for programming $130 million to projects in Alameda and San Mateo County and approved Resolution No. 4411 for the Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program with the award of $28.0 million to Union City projects, $25.0 million for Quarry Lakes Parkway, and $3.0 million for the Union City BART East Entrance and At-Grade Crossing; and
155 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Accept $16.72M MTC RM3 Grant for Quarry Lakes Parkway

WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-097, authorizing the City Manager to submit an Allocation Request for $25.0 million to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program and accepting Alameda County Transportation Commission’s designation of the City of Union City as the Implementing Agency for the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2025, the City Council received a report on the Revised Funding Allocation Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 1804, see Exhibit A for Presentation; and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2025, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) approved Resolution No. 25-009 Designating the City of Union City as the Implementing Agency for the Subproject of the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project - Quarry Lakes Parkway Project (RM 3 Subproject #17.5), see Exhibit B for Alameda CTC Resolution; and
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2025, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) approved Resolution No. 4660 for the allocation of Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement project (RM 3 Project#17) sponsored by Bay Area Toll Authority, Alameda County Transportation Commission, San Mateo County Transit District and the San Mateo Transportation Authority and includes allocation of $16.73 million in RM 3 funds to the City of Union City for the construction of Quarry Lakes Parkway Project (RM 3 Project #17.5), see Exhibit C for MTC Resolution; and WHEREAS, the approved allocation of Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement project for Quarry Lakes Parkway (QLP), RM 3 Project #17.5 in the amount of $16,728,000 is summarized below:

MTC Allocation for RM 3 Subproject #17.5
Quarry Lakes Parkway Project
QLP, Phase 1 Final Design $2,578,000
QLP, Phase 1A-Temporary Bus Facility Construction 1,000,000 QLP, Phase 2, Right of Way 150,000
QLP, Phases 1-4, Off-Site Mitigation Construction 13,000,000 Total $16,728,000
; and
WHEREAS, the remaining $8,272,000 of the $25.0 million in RM 3 Funds programmed for Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 Construction will be approved as part of a future allocation request; and
156 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Accept $16.72M MTC RM3 Grant for Quarry Lakes Parkway

157 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Accept $16.72M MTC RM3 Grant for Quarry Lakes Parkway

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2026, Public Works received the approved Allocation of Regional Measure 3 (RM 3) Funds for FY 2025-26 Letter #01 from Metropolitan Transportation Commission for Quarry Lakes Parkway totaling $3,728,000 for Quarry Lakes Parkway (RM 3 Project #17.5) for Phase 1- Final Design ($ 2,578,000), Phase 1A -Temporary Bus Facility Construction on Block 6 ($1,000,000) and Phase 2- Right of Way ($150,000), see Exhibit D; and
WHEREAS, on the same day, Public Works received the approved Allocation of Regional Measure 3 (RM 3) Funds for FY 2025-26 Letter #02 from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in the amount of $13,000,000 for Quarry Lakes Parkway (RM 3 Project #17.5) Offsite Mitigation Construction for Phases 1-4 within Union City, see Exhibit E; and
WHEREAS, Union City will receive $16,728,000 from the RM 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements project (RM 3 Project #17.5) funds for Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04, and these funds will be accounted for in the Capital Projects Grants Fund (Fund 410). This will be in addition to the $6,270,000 adopted by the City Council for FY 2025-2026, detailed below:

Union City Project No. 18-04
Quarry Lakes Parkway (Phases 1-4)
FY 2025-2026
Adopted Budget
Fund 250-State Gas Tax Fund $100,000
Fund 251-SB 1 Road Maint & Rehab Fund 500,000
Fund 264-Measure BB (2014) Fund 200,000
Fund 266-DIPSA Development Fund 100,000
Fund 267-Measure BB Bike & Ped Fund 75,000
Fund 410-Capital Projects Grants Fund 3,995,000
Fund 416-Public Improvements Fund 1,300,000
Total $6,270,000
; and
WHEREAS, City Council action is necessary to amend the Capital Projects Grants Fund (Fund 410) budget for FY2025-2026 as a result of accepting this additional funding.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby accepts $16,728,000 from the Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and authorizes the use of those funds for the Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby amends the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund revenue budget by increasing the revenue projection in Account Number 410-91804-44502 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Quarry Lakes Parkway Project – Misc. County/Local Grants) by $16,728,000. 158 of 251
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Accept $16.72M MTC RM3 Grant for Quarry Lakes Parkway

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Union City hereby amends the FY 2025-2026 Capital Projects Grants Fund expenditure budget by appropriating an additional $16,728,000 to Account Number 410-91804-57128 (Capital Projects Grants Fund – Quarry Lakes Parkway Project – Street Improvements) for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Union City at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED:

GARY SINGH
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

THAI NAM N. PHAM
City Clerk
KRISTOPHER J. KOKOTAYLO
City Attorney
Attachments:

1. Exhibit A – Revised MTC RM3 Allocation Presentation

2. Exhibit B - Alameda County Transportation Commission Resolution No. 25-009

3. Exhibit C - MTC RM3 Resolution No. 4660, Revised

4. Exhibit D – MTC RM3 Allocation Letter #1

5. Exhibit E – MTC RM3 Allocation Letter #2
159 of 251
Receive a Report on the Revised Funding
Allocation Request to the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) from
Regional Measure 3 Dumbarton Corridor
Improvement Program for the Quarry Lakes
Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04
Marilou R. Ayupan, Public Works Director
City Manager Report- Item 6.2
September 23, 2025 - City Council Meeting
160 of 251
2 MTC’s Regional Measure 3 (RM 3) Program ($4.45 Billion) (Approved by Voters in 2018)
RM 3 Expenditure Plan (Projects and Programs)
(17) Dumbarton Corridor Improvements. ($130,000,000).

Funds planning, environmental review, design, and construction of capital improvements within the Dumbarton Bridge and rail corridor in the Counties of Alameda and San Mateo to relieve congestion, increase person throughput, and offer reliable travel times. Eligible projects recommended in the Dumbarton Corridor Transportation Study and improvements to facilitate rail and transit connectivity among ACE, Capitol Corridor, and BART, including rail connection at the Shinn Station. The project sponsors are BATA, Alameda CTC, San Mateo Transit District and San Mateo County Transportation Authority.
161 of 251
3 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program Funds
MTC Approved RM 3 List of Projects in June 2024
162 of 251
4 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
MTC RM 3 Approval Process for Quarry Lakes Parkway
At July 8,2025 City Council approved the submittal of RM3 DB Corridor Funding Allocation Request to Alameda CTC and MTC Request of $25 Million of Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Funds for Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, City Project No. 18-04 will be for construction of:
▪ Environmental Off-Site Mitigation $20.0 million
▪ Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 1 $ 1.5 million
▪ Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2 $ 3.5 million
$ 25.0 million
Major Cost Reduction of the Environmental Mitigation
163 of 251
5 QUARRY LAKES PARKWAY, PHASES 1-4
Old Alameda
Creek
Alameda Creek
Flood Control
Channel
Line M
Line M
164 of 251
6 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
New Basin (Line M Detention Basin) –CEQA EIR
Is New Basin a “Season Pond”?
Temporary Stores Stormwater Runoff
February 2022 (Winter) July 2022 (Summer)
165 of 251
7 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
New Basin (Line M Detention Basin) –Mitigation Costs
• RM3 Request, $20 million
• RWQCB defined the
existing Line M Detention
Basin as Seasonal Pond
(“Waters of the State)
• Requires 3:1 Mitigation
Ratio
• Union City did not agree
• Held meetings with
RWQCB to discuss
Environmental Mitigation Option 2- $30 million
166 of 251
8 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
New Basin (Line M Detention Basin) –History
- DTSC/PSSC Clean Up Site
(2000-2006)
- Caltrans Route 84 EIS/EIR
(2003-2005)
- New KB Homes Temporary
Drainage (2003-2005)
- Est. Cost $900,000
Detention Basin always
intended to be temporary
basin until the roadway is
constructed.
167 of 251
9 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
New Basin (Line M Detention Basin) –History
▪ The Line M Detention Basin/Pump Station, City Project No. 03-25 was designed to provide interim stormwater runoff basin to allow the development of the housing on the former PSSC sites. After a storm event, Public Works operates the pump station to drain the basin into the Line M Channel to avoid the creation of a wetland.
▪ The future Route 84 excavation area was used as an interim detention pond. Intended to be temporary until SR 84 construction in 2009 (by Caltrans). ▪ Authorized by RWQCB (File No. 21-51004, 2004) to construct basin and pumping facility at the future 84 site and the bypass and outfall pipes connecting detention basin and Line M Channel. 168 of 251
10 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
New Basin (Line M Detention Basin) –History
• City constructed the Line M
Detention Basin in 2006 and
expected Route 84
construction by 2009
• Discussed Line M Overflow
pipeline will add this
stormwater to Old Alameda
Creel (Relocating basin)
• Submitted RWQCB with
Project History and
Maintenance Memo
• RWQCB concurrence on
August 4, 2025
Environmental Mitigation Option 1 - $13 Million $17.0 million SAVINGS 169 of 251
11 Environmental Off-Site Mitigation
(Construction& Permits)
Line M
• Sites Approved by RWQCB (Regional
Water Quality Control Board)
• Meets Mitigation requirements for
Wetland, Riparian, Species and Waters
and other Alameda CTC projects
• Developers also want these sites
Proposed Location (Livermore)
1) Manning Ranch (part of Eagle Ridge)
2) Livermore Valley Preserve
Revised RM3 Request- Mitigation
Cost: $13 million
170 of 251
12 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
Met with Alameda CTC to provide QLP status and discuss
strategy to revise RM3 Funding Allocation Request.

Revised RM3 Funding Allocation Request
▪ Mitigation (Per RWQCB concur) $13.000 million
▪ QLP, Segment (Phase) 1 PS&E $ 2.578 million*
▪ QLP, Segment (Phase) 1A CON $ 1.000 million
▪ QLP, Segment (Phase) 2 CON $ 8.422 million
$25.000 Million
171 of 251
13 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
Environmental Mitigation (Spring 2026)
Off Site Mitigation (Oberling Environmental Site)
QLP, Segment (Phase) 1 Final PS&E (Dec. 2025- Jan 2027) Currently at 65%PS&E. Proceed with project coordination and completion of the Final Design (with 95%, 100% and Final PS&E) QLP, Segment (Phase) 1A CON (Spring 2026)
Construct Off-Site Location to relocate all transit fleet (UC and DBX) to accommodate QLP, Phase 1 Construction (before CY Wall Moves) QLP, Segment (Phase) 2 CON (Spring 2027)
On Caltrans Property, includes realign Quarry Lakes Drive, AlvaradoNiles Road improvements, new utilities, stormwater treatment basin and Line M Overflow Pipe into Old Alameda Creek
172 of 251
14 PHASE 1: 7TH STREET CONNECTION
(7TH Street to Mission Boulevard)
▪ Realign 7th Street along Corp Yard to
connect to Chesapeake with new
Traffic Signal
▪ Reconstruct the Line M Open
Channel and Box
▪ Relocate & Reconstruct Corp Yard
Security Wall
▪ Modify QLP/Mission Blvd
Intersection
▪ New parking lot for CY & Dog Park
Construction Estimate-$41.3 million
Revised RM3 Request-
$2.578 million for Final
Design (Consultant)
173 of 251
15 PHASE 1: 7TH STREET CONNECTION
(7TH Street to Mission Boulevard)
Advance Improvements (Corp Yard Impacts)
▪ Relocate entire transit fleet to during construction
▪ Construct temporary transit fleet (UC Transit and
DBX) storage area at 11th Street parking lot
(Block 6)
▪ Pave the southern portion of Corp Yard
Revised RM3 Request, QLP, Phase 1A is $1.0 million
for Construction (Partial Funding)
174 of 251
16 PHASE 2: GATEWAY CONNECTION
(Old Alameda Creek to Alvarado-Niles Road)
▪ Construct storm water quality
treatment basin and outfall structures
in Old Alameda Creek
▪ Realign existing Quarry Lakes Drive
between new QLP and Isherwood
next to creek
▪ Install and modify utilities
▪ Install new traffic signal and street
lighting
Construction Estimate - $42.1 million
Revised RM3 Request-
$8.422 million for CON
(Partial Funding)
175 of 251
17 Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2
Multimodal Design Elements
• “Complete Streets” Design
• 20-foot Multi-Use Path
• Buffered Bike Lanes
• 35 MPH Speed Limit
• Landscaped Medians
• Connections to Parks and Trails
176 of 251
18 Quarry Lakes Parkway, Phase 2
Caltrans Property (LATIP Revenue $86 million)
Quarry Lakes Drive
Caltrans
Parcel
Caltrans Parcel
Approximate ROW Quarry Lakes Parkway / New Quarry Lakes Drive 177 of 251
19 Former Caltrans Gateway Site Status
• Caltrans Purchase Sale Agmt.(PSA) - 2019
• Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA)
▪ Executed Dec. 14, 2021
▪ 400 – 535 units
▪ 25% affordable (Surplus Land Act)
▪ Criteria for preservation of historic
resource area
▪ Extended through June 7, 2026.
▪ Negotiations pending final roadway
plans, permits and secured funding
Sale will fund LATIP projects ($86 million)
incl. Quarry Lakes Parkway ($41.8 million)
178 of 251
20 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
Submit $25.0 Million RM3 Allocation Request
* Updated Total Cost for QLP, Phase 1-3 is $221.3 million 179 of 251
21 Quarry Lakes Parkway-Decoto Complete Streets Funds
Dedicated Transportation Funds Regional
Sources
Amount
AlaCTC 1986 Measure B Funds* County $65,500,000
AlaCTC 2005 CMA-TIP County $14,300,000
Caltrans Route 84 LATIP Funds State $41,814,000
AlaCTC 2014 Measure BB (TEP 21-
Dumbarton)
County $40,000,000
AlaCTC 2014 Measure BB (TEP 22-
Intermodal Station)
County $75,000,000
MTC RM3, Dumbarton Corridor
Funds
Bay Area $25,000,000
Total Funds $261,614,000
180 of 251
22 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
181 of 251
23 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
MTC RM3 Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program:

Funding Allocation Request for Quarry Lakes Parkway.

Revised RM3 Funding Allocation Request
▪ Environmental Mitigation $13.000 million
▪ QLP, Segment (Phase) 1 PS&E $ 2.578 million
▪ QLP, Segment (Phase) 1A CON $ 1.000 million
▪ QLP, Segment (Phase) 2 CON $ 8.422 million
$25.000 Million
182 of 251
24 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program
July 8,2025 City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-097, which allows CM to resubmit revisions to the RM3 funding allocation request forms (Attachment 5) in Staff Report. • Initial Project Report
• RM3 Funding Plan
• RM3 Allocation Request Information*
• Cash Flow Plan*
• MTC Complete Streets (Bike/Ped) Checklist Form
Forms are being reviewed by Alameda CTC and MTC staff
for upcoming Commission approvals in next few months
183 of 251
25 RM 3, Dumbarton Corridor Improvement Program Funds
Receive a report on the Revised Funding Allocation
Request to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) from Regional Measure 3,
Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Program for the
Quarry Lakes Parkway, City Project No. 18-04
Questions?
184 of 251
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Resolution No. 25-009
Resolution of the Alameda County Transportation Commission Designating the City of Union City as the Implementing Agency for a Subproject of the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project (RM3 Project #17)
WHEREAS, SB 595 (Chapter 650, Statutes 2017), commonly referred as Regional Measure 3, identified projects eligible to receive funding under the Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is responsible for funding projects eligible for Regional Measure 3 funds, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 30914.7(a) and (c); and WHEREAS, MTC has established a process whereby eligible transportation project sponsors may submit allocation requests for Regional Measure 3 funding; and
WHEREAS, allocation requests to MTC must be submitted consistent with procedures and conditions as outlined in Regional Measure 3 Policies and Procedures (MTC Resolution No. 4404); and
WHEREAS, Alameda CTC is a sponsor of RM3 Project #17, Dumbarton Corridor Improvements, in the Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan; and WHEREAS, the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, Subproject 17.4, is eligible for consideration in the Regional Measure 3 Expenditure Plan, as identified in California Streets and Highways Code Section 30914.7(a); and WHEREAS, Alameda CTC desires to designate the City of Union City (“Union City”) as an entity that is eligible to request Regional Measure 3 funds for the Project #17, Dumbarton Corridor Improvements project; and Sponsor Agency: Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC)
Implementing Agency: City of Union City
Project Title: Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project
(RM3 Project #17)
Subproject Title: Quarry Lakes Parkway Project (RM3
Subproject #17.4)
Commission Chair
Supervisor David Haubert,
Alameda County, District 1
Commission Vice Chair
Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft,
City of Alameda
Alameda County
Supervisor Elisa Márquez, District 2
Supervisor Lena Tam, District 3
Supervisor Nate Miley, District 4
Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bas, District 5
AC Transit
Director - District At-Large Joel B.

Young
BART
Vice President Melissa Hernandez
City of Albany
Councilmember Preston Jordan
City of Berkeley
Councilmember Terry Taplin
City of Dublin
Mayor Sherry Hu
City of Emeryville
Councilmember Matthew Solomon
City of Fremont
Mayor Raj Salwan
City of Hayward
Mayor Mark Salinas
City of Livermore
Mayor John Marchand
City of Newark
Mayor Michael K. Hannon
City of Oakland
Councilmember Carroll Fife
Councilmember At-Large Rowena
Brown
City of Piedmont
Vice Mayor Conna McCarthy
City of Pleasanton
Mayor Jack Balch
City of San Leandro
Mayor Juan González, III
City of Union City
Mayor Gary Singh
Executive Director
Tony Tavares
185 of 251
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Resolution No. 25-009

WHEREAS, the Regional Measure 3 allocation request, attached hereto in the Initial Project Report (IPR) and incorporated herein as though set forth at length, lists the project, purpose, schedule, budget, expenditure and cash flow plan for which Union City is requesting that MTC allocate Regional Measure 3 funds; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Union City approved the allocation request and updated IPR at its July 8, 2025 meeting; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that Alameda CTC designates Union City as the implementing agency for the project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that Alameda CTC delegates responsibility for certifying the project and allocation request(s) comply with the requirements of MTC’s Regional Measure 3 Policies and Procedures to Union City; and be it further
RESOLVED, that Alameda CTC confirms that Union City is required to comply with the provisions of MTC’s Regional Measure 3 Policies and Procedures; and be it further RESOLVED, that Alameda CTC certifies that the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, Subproject 17.4, is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); and be it further RESOLVED, that Alameda CTC approves the allocation request and updated Initial Project Report, attached to this resolution; and be it further
RESOLVED, that Union City is authorized to request an allocation of up to $25.0 million in Regional Measure 3 funds for the Quarry Lakes Parkway Project, Sub-project 17.4 for the project and purposes as described in the IPR attached to this resolution; and be it further
RESOLVED, that Alameda CTC indemnifies and holds harmless MTC, BATA, and their Commissioners, representatives, agents, and employees from and against all claims, injury, suits, demands, liability, losses, damages, and expenses, whether direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therewith), incurred by reason of any act or failure to act of Alameda CTC, its officers, employees or agents, or subcontractors or any of them in connection with its performance of services under this allocation of RM3 funds. Alameda CTC agrees at its own cost, expense, and risk, to defend any and all claims, actions, suits, or other legal proceedings brought or instituted against MTC, BATA, and their Commissioners, officers, agents, and employees, or any of them, arising out of such act or omission, and to pay and satisfy any resulting judgments. In addition to any other remedy authorized by law, so much of the funding due under this allocation of RM3 funds as shall reasonably be considered necessary by MTC may be retained until disposition has been made of any claim for damages, and be it further RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to MTC in conjunction with the filing of the Union City allocation request referenced herein.

DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Alameda CTC Commission at the regular Commission meeting held on December 11, 2025, in Oakland, California, by the following vote:
186 of 251
Alameda County Transportation Commission
Resolution No. 25-009

AYES: 23 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 4
Balch, Bowen, Brown, Ezzy
Ashcraft, González, Hannon,
Haubert, Hernandez, Hu,
Marchand, McCarthy, Miley,
Salinas, Salwan, Singh,
Solomon, Taplin, Young
Fife, Fortunato Bas,
Jordan, Márquez
SIGNED: Attest:
_________________________ _____________________________ David Haubert Elizabeth (Liz) Lake
Chair, Alameda CTC Clerk of the Commission
187 of 251
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A6 Date:

W.I.:

Referred by:

Revised:

ABSTRACT
Resolution No. 4660, Revised
July 24, 2024
1255
PAC
11/20/2024-C
01/22/2025-C
12/17/2025-C
This resolution approves the allocation ofRegional Measure 3 funds for Dumbarton Corridor Improvements project (RM3 Project# 17), sponsored by the Bay Area Toll Authority, Alameda County Transportation Commission, the San Mateo County Transit District, and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority.

This Resolution includes the following attachments:

Attachment A- Allocation Summary and Conditions ofAllocation Attachment B- Project and Subproject Details
Attachment C- Project Funding Plan and Schedule
Attachment D- RM3 Deliverable Segment/Product Cash Flow Plan This resolution allocates $3 million in RM3 funds to the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) for the Project Approval & Environmental Document stage (PA&ED) phase ofthe San Mateo Dumbarton Busway project (RM3 Project# 17.1 ).

This resolution was revised on November 20, 2024 to allocate $3 million in RM3 funds to the City of Union City for the construction phase ofthe Union City BART At-grade Pedestrian Crossing Project (RM3 Project# 17.2) and to allocate $1.08 million to the City of Fremont for the design phase ofthe Quarry Lakes Trail Project Phase A Segment (RM3 Project# 17.3).

This resolution was revised on January 22, 2025, to allocate $1 million in RM3 funds to BATA for the planning phase ofthe Marshland Road Bay Trail Project (RM3 Project #17.4).

This resolution was revised on December 17, 2025, to allocate $16.73 million in RM3 funds to the City of Union City for the construction ofthe Quarry Lakes Parkway Project (RM3 Project #17.5).

Further discussion ofthese actions are contained in the Programming and Allocations Summary Sheets dated July 10, 2024, November 13, 2024, January 8, 2025, and December 10, 2025. 188 of 251
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A6 Date:

W.I.:

Referred by:

July 24, 2024
1255
PAC
RE: Approval ofAllocation ofRegional Measure 3 Funds for Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project.

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 4660
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay Area pursuant to Government Code Section 66500 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Sections 30950 et seq. created the Bay Area Toll Authority ("BATA") which is a public instrumentality governed by the same board as that governing MTC; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2018, a special election was held in the City and County of San Francisco, and the Counties ofAlameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma (individually, each a "County" and, collectively, the "Counties") to approve a toll increase ofthree dollars ($3 .00) phased in over time, including a one dollar ($1.00) toll increase on January 1, 2019, a one dollar ($1.00) toll increase on January 1, 2022, and a one dollar ($1.00) toll increase on January 1, 2025, for vehicles traveling on the state-owned bridges located in the San Francisco Bay Area ("Regional Measure 3"); and WHEREAS, on September 26, 2018, BATA adopted Resolution No. 126 accepting certified statements from the Registrar ofVoters ofthe City and County of San Francisco and each ofthe Counties and observing that a majority of all voters voting on Regional Measure 3 (RM3") at such special election voted affirmatively for RM3; and WHEREAS, RM3 establishes the RM3 Expenditure Plan and identifies specific capital projects and programs and operating programs eligible to receive RM3 funding as identified in Sections 30914.7(a) and (c) ofthe California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, BATA shall fund the projects ofthe RM3 Expenditure Plan by bonding or transfers to MTC; and
189 of 251
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A46

ABSTRACT
MTC Resolution No. 4660

WHEREAS, MTC adopted RM3 Policies and Procedures for the implementation ofthe RM3 Expenditure Plan, specifying the allocation criteria and project compliance requirements for RM3 funding (MTC Resolution No. 4404); and
WHEREAS, the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project is identified as capital project number 17 under the RM3 expenditure plan and is eligible to receive RM3 funding as identified in Streets and Highways Code Sections 30914.7(a); and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission has programmed the list of projects, sponsors, and implementing agencies eligible to seek allocation under this category through MTC Resolution Number 4411, Revised; and
WHEREAS, the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA), Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC), the San Mateo County Transit District, and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority are the project sponsors for the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project Sponsor and/or designated implementing agency has submitted a request for the allocation ofRM3 funds under the Dumbarton Corridor Improvements Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project Sponsor or designated implementing agency has submitted an initial Project Report (IPR), as required pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 30914.7(d); and
WHEREAS, Attachment A to this resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth at length, lists the project and phase for which the Project Sponsor and/or designated implementing agency is requesting RM3 funding and the amount recommended for allocation by MTC staff; and
WHEREAS, Attachment B to this resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth at length, lists the required project specific conditions which must be met prior to execution ofthe allocation and any reimbursement ofRM3 funds; and 190 of 251
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A46

ABSTRACT
MTC Resolution No. 4660

WHEREAS, Attachment C to this resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth at length, includes MTC staff's review ofthe Project Sponsor or designated implementing agency's IPR for this project; and
WHEREAS, Attachment D attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth at length, lists the cash flow ofRM3 funds and complementary funding for the deliverable RM3 project segment or product; and
WHEREAS, this allocation is conditioned on satisfaction ofthe requirement that appropriate determinations under CEQA/NEPA have been made by the lead agency for compliance with the requirements ofthe California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), and with the State Environmental Impact Report Guidelines (14 California Code ofRegulations Section 15000 et seq.) prior to disbursement of RM3 funds for the projects and purposes listed and recorded in Attachment A; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that MTC approves MTC staff's review ofthe Project Sponsor or designated implementing agency's IPR for this project as set forth in Attachment C; and, be it further
RESOLVED, that MTC approves the allocation and reimbursement ofRM3 funds in accordance with the amount, reimbursement schedule, and allocation expiration dates for the phases and activities as set forth in Attachment A; and, be it further RESOLVED, that the allocation and reimbursement ofRM3 funds as set forth in Attachment A are conditioned upon Project Sponsor and/or designated implementing agency's complying with the provisions ofthe RM3 Policies and Procedures as set forth at length in MTC Resolution No. 4404, Revised; and, be it further
RESOLVED, that the allocation and reimbursement ofRM3 funds are further conditioned upon the project specific conditions set forth in attachment B; and, be it further 191 of 251
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E082408A46

ABSTRACT
MTC Resolution No. 4660

RESOLVED, that the allocation and reimbursement ofRM3 funds as set forth in Attachment A are conditioned upon the availability and expenditure of any complementary funding as set forth in Attachment D; and, be it further RESOLVED, that a certified copy ofthis resolution shall be forwarded to the project sponsor.

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Alfredo Pedroza, Chair
The above resolution was entered into by the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission at a
duly called and noticed meeting held in
San Francisco, California and at other remote
locations, on July 24, 2024.
192 of 251
Docusign Envelope ID: 0984DDA9-9016-4EDF-BC3B-F98E08240846 be Regional Measure 3
Allocation of Funds
Allocation Summary
July 24, 2024
Attachment A-1
MTC Resolution No. 4660