Upland City Council
June 8, 2026

4I'av Upt� CITY
UPLAND
ff "The City of Gracious Living"

MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
,.21,rfei/t61Pa/
Bill Velto,Mayor
Sharman Maust, Mayor Pro Tem• District 1 Michael Blay,City Manager James Breitling,Councilmember-District 2 Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney Carlos A. Garcia,Councilmember -District 3 Keri Johnson, City Clerk Rudy Zuniga, Councilmember- District 4
Monday, June 8, 2026
Open session begins at 6:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
City Hall, 460 N. Euclid Avenue
Residents may observe the City Council meetings remotely via livestream on the City website, Spectrum Cable TV Channel 3, or Frontier Cable TV Channel 26.

City of Upland Mission Statement
The City of Upland is committed to delivering superior services that meet community needs with transparency and integrity.

City of Upland Vision Statement
Upland is a safe community with historic character where residents enjoy a high quality of life.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

2. ADDITIONS-DELETIONS TO AGENDA

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time for any citizen to comment on item listed on the closed session agenda only. Anyone wishing to address the legislative body is requested to submit a speaker card to the City Clerk at or prior to speaking. The speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than three (3) minutes. The use of visual aids will be included in the time limit.

CLOSED SESSION BEGINS AT 5:00 p.m.

4. CLOSED SESSION
a. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING

LITIGATION
i. Solorzano et al. v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVSB2207375
ii. Camilleri, Linda v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2400123
iii. Cano, Ronnie Fred v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2401301

iv. Espinoza et al. v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2506382
v. Corona, Kiana v. City of Upland, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 5:25-cv-03458-GW vi. Guerrero, Priscilla v. Upland Unified School District et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No.

CIVRS2501001
vii. Laureano, Benny v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVSB2317284
viii. Lopez, Ignacio v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2400981
ix. Teixeira, Carlos v. City of Upland et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2505576
x. Kaufman Jr., William Paul v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVSB2405182
xi. Quinones et al. v. City of Upland et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2600375
xii. Hemenway, Robert v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2506419
xiii. Lopez, Donna v. City of Upland et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2600376
xiv. McDonald, Maggie v County of San Bernardino et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2504306 xv. Neale, Michelle v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2401627
xvi. Sheridan, Janice v City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2510715
xvii. Doe, John v City of Upland et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVSB2220905
xviii. Thompson, Michael v. City of Upland et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2501700
xix. Ramos, Keri v. City of Upland, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 5:25-cv-01820-KK-SSC xx. Silva et al. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2505275
xxi. Clay, Nathanael Douglass v. City of Upland, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 5:26-cv-00068-MWC-MBK xxii. Fuentez, Gabriel v. City of Upland, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 5:25-cv-02915-KK (DTBx) xxiii. Stokes, Douglas v. City of Upland, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 5:25-cv-03480-MWF-BFM xxiv. Gilmour, Jeffrey v. City of Upland, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 25-cv-00967
xxv. Presley, Amunique v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior

Court of California, Case No. CIVRS2601691

5. INVOCATION
Mike Ingram, Christian Science Faith

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7. PRESENTATIONS

8. CITY ATTORNEY

9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is a time for any citizen to comment on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.

Anyone wishing to address the legislative body is requested to submit a speaker card to the City Clerk at or prior to speaking. The speakers are requested to keep their comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Speakers will be given five (5) minutes during public hearings. The use of visual aids will be included in the time limit. Public comments and questions for the purpose of hearing current matters of concern in our community and to provide citizens a method for the public to hear those concerns in an open venue is encouraged. However, under the provisions of the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from discussion of items not listed on the agenda, and therefore, the City Council, City Manager, or City Attorney will take communications under advisement for consideration and appropriate response or discussion at a later time.

Individuals who demonstrate disruptive conduct during City Council meetings that prevent the City Council from conducting its meeting in an orderly manner are guilty of a misdemeanor as stated in PC403, disrupting a public meeting, and are subject to removal from the chamber or arrest.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant Gov. Code § 84308, any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the legislative body request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Consent Calendar
a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 8
Recommended Action:

Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 26, 2026 and the Special Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2026. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson)
b. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2011 16

Recommended Action:

Adopt Ordinance No. 2011 adopting Specific Plan Amendment No. 25-0003 (Amendment No. 4) to the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan as shown in Exhibits A, B and C to the Ordinance. (Staff Person: Robert Dalquest) c. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2012 AMENDING UPLAND MUNICIPAL 50 CODE CHAPTER 2.04 REGARDING POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CITY

MANAGER
Recommended Action:

Adopt Ordinance No. 2012 amending Chapter 2.04 of the Upland Municipal Code as follows: 1) amending Section 2.04.070 subsection C and 2) adding Section

2.04.070 subsection D. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)
d. CONSIDER RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD OF 55

TRUSTEES
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Ratify the Mayor's appointment of Owen Egger and Jesse Juarez to the Library Board of Trustees, terms expire June 30, 2029. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson) e. CONSIDER RATIFICATION OF AN APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT 62

TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Ratify the Mayor's appointment of Michael Couper and the reappointment of Brian Staton to the Planning Commission, terms ending June 30, 2030. (Staff Person:

Keri Johnson)
f. BIENNIAL REVIEW OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE 70 CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Direct staff to review the code and submit notice that either an amendment is required or no amendment is necessary. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson) g. ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 71 MEMBER
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Accept the resignation from City Council Advisory Committee Member Monica Marroquin and direct the City Clerk to post the notice of unscheduled vacancy. (Staff Person: Keri Johnson)
h. FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ALLOCATION PLAN, UPDATED SOLID WASTE 72

COST ALLOCATION AND UPDATED ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY FOR

SELF-FUNDED LIABILITY
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Receive and file an update on the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cost Allocation Plan; 2) receive and file an update on the allocated costs for additional services under the Amended and Restated Agreement with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc; 3) approve a budget amendment from the Solid Waste Utility Reserve Fund balance in the amount of$225,000 to cover the reallocation of costs related to pressure washing and porter services; 4) receive and file an update on the proposed allocation methodology for the City's Self-Funded Liability Internal Service Fund; and 5) approve the General Fund savings realized by the updated allocation methodology for the Self-Funded Liability Insurance Fund from Fiscal Years 2023-24, 2024-25, and 2025-26 to be applied towards the budget deficit in Fiscal Years 2026-27 and 2027-28. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker) i. CONSIDERATION OF A CASH IN LIEU AGREEMENT FOR 103

UNDERGROUNDING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP
20819
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Adopt a Resolution approving a cash in lieu agreement for undergrounding and public improvements as provided in Conditions 30.7 through 30.13 and 30.21 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 20819 and Development Plan Review No. 24-05 concerning the creation of two out-parcels in the Mountain Green Commercial Center located at 233 S. Mountain Avenue; and authorize the City Manager to execute the cash-in lieu agreement. (Staff Person: Robert Dalquest) j. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 20819 AND SUBDIVISION 129

AGREEMENT FOR THE MOUNTAIN GREEN CENTER ON MOUNTAIN AVE, SOUTH OF 8TH STREET
CEQA: Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines Recommended Action:

Approve Parcel Map 20819 for recordation; and authorize the City Manager to sign the subdivision agreement. (Staff Person: Robert Dalquest) k. EMERGENCY REPAIR WORK FOR 26 W. 15TH STREET TRANSFER 137

STATION UPDATE
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommended Action:

Receive and file the status update related to the KSM Electric, Inc. contract for emergency repair work at the 26 W. 15th Street Transfer Station. (Staff Person:

Damien Arrula)
I. CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM 138 2024 FUNDS
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

Accept the City's share of the 2024 Homeland Security Grant Program award in the amount of $28,832, appropriate the grant funds to Fund 214; and authorize

the City Manager to execute any and all documents necessary to implement the grant. (Staff Person: Marcelo Blanco)

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ADOPTION OF WATER, 144

RECYCLED WATER, AND SEWER RATE ADJUSTMENTS AND RELATED

FINDINGS
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

The City Council will conduct a public hearing and consider adoption of water, recycled water, and sewer rate adjustments and related findings. (Staff Person:

Damien Arrula)

1. Receive public comment on the Resolution making findings regarding legal objections to proposed water and sewer rates

2. Adopt a Resolution making certain findings and determinations regarding legal objections to proposed water and sewer rates

3. Open Public Hearing

4. Staff presentation

5. Receive public comment on proposed water, recycled water, and sewer rates

6. Close Public Hearing

7. If no majority protest exists, approve a resolution making certain findings under the California Environmental Quality Act and adopting the rate schedules and related adjustments as recommended by staff.

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING, TRAINING, OR

CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE
Councilmembers will provide oral reports on any meetings, trainings, or conferences they attended on behalf of the City. This item is for information only.

13. BUSINESS ITEMS
a. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 —2027-28 BIENNIAL 281

BUDGET AND RELATED ACTIONS
CEQA: Not a Project.

Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve a Resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 — 2027-28 biennial budget;

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the General Fund Reserve Policy;

3. Adopt a Resolution approving the appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2026-27;

4. Adopt a Resolution placing a two-year pause on the Park Lease

Revenue designation established by Resolution No. 6713;

5. Approve the updated Schedule of Positions;

6. Approve amending the City's Classification Plan to include the Deputy Finance Director, Principal Human Resources/Risk Management Analyst, Principal Planner, and Principal Economic Development Coordinator job descriptions;

7. Approve the updated salary schedules for Executives and Non- Rep/Confidential. (Staff Person: Stephen Parker)

14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS

15. CITY MANAGER

16. ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is Monday, June 22, 2026.

NOTE: If you challenge the public hearing(s) or the related environmental determinations in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Upland, at, or prior to, the public hearing.

All Agenda items and back-up materials are available for public review at the Upland Public Library, at 450 North Euclid Avenue, the City Clerk's Office at 460 North Euclid Avenue and the City website at www.uplandca.gov .

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office, 909-931-4120.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II].

To access written transcription during the meeting, please click this link:
https://attend.wordly.ai/join/LVGO-0906 . Then choose language and click attend to read the transcript on your device.

On June 3, 2026 a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at 450 N. Euclid Avenue (Upland Public Library) and 460 N. Euclid Avenue (Upland City Hall), and the City website at www.uplandca.gov

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE UPLAND CITY COUNCIL May 26, 2026
6:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
City Hall, 460 N. Euclid Avenue
Members Present: Mayor Pro Tern Shannan Maust, Councilmember James Breitling, Councilmember Carlos A. Garcia, Councilmember Rudy Zuniga Members Absent: Mayor Bill Velto
Staff Present: Assistant City Manager Stephen Parker, Deputy City Attorney Alex Gonzalez, City Clerk Keri Johnson

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The regular meeting of the Upland City Council was called to order by Mayor Pro Tern Shannan Maust at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Upland City Hall.

Moved by: Councilmember Zuniga
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Excuse the absence of Mayor Velto
Motion: Carried Unanimously with Mayor Velto absent

2. ADDITIONS-DELETIONS TO AGENDA
City Clerk Johnson announced that items 10h and 10i were removed from the agenda, and the Baker to Vegas presentation was also removed.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.

CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 p.m.

4. CLOSED SESSION
At 5:01 p.m. Mayor Pro Tern Maust announced that the City Council would recess to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code
a. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS California Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: Vacant land located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 645 feet west of Benson Avenue in the City of Upland (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 1007-271-45 & 1007-271-47)
1

City Negotiators: City Manager Michael Blay, Development Services Director Robert Dalquest and Economic Development Coordinator Mel Picazo Negotiating Party: Jay Soni, XEBEC and James Dolback, Azure Seafood Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
b. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING

LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Name of Case: Alan Ansara v City of Upland, WCAB Case No. ADJ19496568 c. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING

LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Name of Case: Alyssa Barrera v City of Upland, WCAB Case No. ADJ20574212 d. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING

LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Name of Case: Neale, Michelle v. City of Upland, San Bernardino County Superior Court of California
Case No. CIVRS2401627
The City Council reconvened in open session at 6:00 p.m.

5. INVOCATION
Rabbi Stephen Epstein, Temple Sholom

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by Michael Miller

7. PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation recognizing City Clerk Keri Johnson for receiving the California Municipal Clerks Association (CMCA) President's Award of Distinction 2026 Presentation of the Dave Stevens Historic Preservation Award presented by Upland Heritage

8. CITY ATTORNEY
Deputy City Attorney Gonzalez announced the City Council received reports and there was no reportable action during Closed Session.

9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Kati Parker, representing Chino Basin Water Conservation District invited Council to attend an upcoming event.
2

Natasha Walton, requested that the Council refrain from reallocating park revenues designated for park funding to the General Fund in upcoming budget years.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by: Councilmember Garcia
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Approve the Consent Calendar
Motion: Carried Unanimously with Mayor Velto absent
a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 11, 2026 and the Special Meeting Minutes of May 18, 2026.
b. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2010 ADDING CHAPTER 5.68 TO TITLE 5

OF THE UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MOBILEHOME RENT
REVIEW
Adopt Ordinance No. 2010 adding Chapter 5.68 to Title 5 of the Upland Municipal Code regarding Mobilehome Rent Review.
c. CONSIDER RATIFYING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Ratify the appointment of Dave Nowell to the City Council Advisory Committee, term to expire in December 2026.
d. CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTIONS RELATED TO THE NOVEMBER 3, 2026 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
Adopt Resolution No. 6876 calling and giving notice of holding a regular municipal election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the state of California relating to General Law cities and requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino to consent to the consolidation of the general municipal election of the City of Upland with the statewide general election to be held on the same date pursuant to Elections Code Section 10403; and adopt Resolution No. 6877 establishing regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates statements submitted to the voters at an election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026.
e. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF MARCH WARRANT AND PAYROLL REGISTERS Approve the April warrant registers totaling $13,469,638.43 (check numbers 56759 — 57145 and direct disbursements) and payroll registers totaling $3,241,493.17 (check numbers 164630 — 164654 and electronic fund transfers 61841 — 62721).
f. TREASURER'S REPORT APRIL 2026
Receive and file the April 2026 Treasurer's Report.
3

g. APPROVAL OF SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT WITH AFSCME LOCAL 20 REGARDING ONE-TIME DOUBLE TIME COMPENSATION FOR JULY 4, 2026 EVENT
Approve the side letter between the City and AFSCME Local 20 providing for one-time double time overtime compensation for eligible employees assigned to work in direct support of the City's July 4, 2026 event. j. NOTICE OF ANNUAL SOLID WASTE RATE ADJUSTMENT
Receive and file notice of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Solid Waste Service Rates as presented in Exhibit M of the Agreement with Burrtec Waste Industries; and direct staff to complete and report on a comprehensive analysis of rates to ensure appropriate cost allocation and long-term fiscal sustainability of the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund.
k. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT WITH HASA, INC. FOR

SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE DELIVERIES
Approve the First Amendment to the agreement with Hasa, Inc. for the goods purchase of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite for water treatment, increasing the not- to-exceed amount by $35,000, for a revised total not-to-exceed amount of $60,000; and authorize the City Manager to execute all related documents.

SENATE BILL 1 (SB1) ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION

ACCOUNT FUNDING AND PROJECT LIST
Adopt Resolution No. 6879 approving a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 funded by Senate Bill 1: Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. m. EMERGENCY REPAIR WORK FOR 26 W. 15TH STREET TRANSFER

STATION UPDATE
Receive and file the status update related to the KSM Electric, Inc. contract for emergency repair work at the 26 W. 15th Street Transfer Station. n. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PURCHASE ORDER INCREASE WITH
EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC. FOR WATER SAMPLING SERVICES Approve an increase to the purchase order with Eurofins Eaton Analytical Inc. for water sampling services in the amount of $56,500, for a revised total purchase order amount not to exceed $198,500, and authorize staff to process all related purchasing documents.
h. UNDERGROUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP 20819
This item was removed from the agenda.

CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 20819 AND SUBDIVISION

AGREEMENT FOR THE MOUNTAIN GREEN CENTER ON MOUNTAIN AVE, SOUTH OF 8th STREET
This item was removed from the agenda.

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
4

a. PUBLIC HEARING ON CITY VACANCIES AND RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION EFFORTS -ASSEMBLY BILL 2561/GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 3502.3
Assistant City Manager Parker introduced Deputy Director of Human Resources/Risk Management Todd who presented the report on City vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts along with a PowerPoint presentation; and answered questions from the Council regarding employee retention and current vacancies.

Mayor Pro Tem Maust opened the public hearing and hearing no testimony, closed the public hearing.

This item was receive and file only.
b. AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN UPLAND SPECIFIC

PLAN (HDUSP)
Development Services Director Dalquest introduced Senior Planner Winter who presented the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation.

Mayor Pro Tem Maust opened the public hearing and hearing no testimony, closed the public hearing.

Moved by: Councilmember Zuniga
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Hold first reading by title only, waive further reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2011 adopting Specific Plan Amendment No. 25-0003 (Amendment No. 4) to the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan as shown in Exhibits A, B and C to the Ordinance; and determine that the proposed Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Motion: Carried Unanimously with Mayor Velto absent

12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. COUNCIL REPORTS ON REGIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING, TRAINING, OR

CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE
None.

13. BUSINESS ITEMS
a. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.04 REGARDING POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CITY

MANAGER
Assistant City Manager Parker presented the proposed changes to the Upland Municipal Code along with a PowerPoint presentation and answered questions from the City Council.

There was discussion regarding the amendment to subsection C of the Upland Municipal Code and the City Manager's signing authority. 5

Moved by: Councilmember Zuniga
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Hold first reading by title only, waive further reading, and introduce Ordinance No. 2012 amending Chapter 2.04 of the Upland Municipal Code as follows: 1) amending Section 2.04.070 subsection C and 2) adding Section 2.04.070 subsection D.

Motion: Carried with Councilmember Garcia opposed and Mayor Velto absent b. CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTION POLICY AS REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 707
City Clerk Johnson presented information on the proposed policy along with a PowerPoint presentation.

Moved by: Councilmember Garcia
Seconded by: Councilmember Zuniga
Adopt Resolution No. 6880 approving a technology disruption policy addressing how the City will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from attending or observing a meeting remotely; as required by Senate Bill 707 (SB 707).

Motion: Carried Unanimously with Mayor Velto absent
c. CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTIONS APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENTS

AND COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS FOR VARIOUS EMPLOYEE GROUPS

AND EXECUTIVES
Deputy City Attorney Gonzalez provided an oral report on compensation changes for executive staff.

Assistant City Manager Parker introduced Deputy Director of Human Resources/Risk Management Todd who presented the changes to compensation and benefits for labor groups along with a PowerPoint presentation.

Moved by: Councilmember Garcia
Seconded by: Councilmember Zuniga

1. Adopt Resolution No. 6881 approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Upland Police Officers Association (UPOA)

2. Adopt Resolution No. 6882 amending the Salary Schedule for the Upland Police Management Association (UPMA)

3. Adopt Resolution No. 6883 amending the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Non-Represented/Confidential Employees

4. Adopt Resolution No. 6884 amending the Compensation and Benefit Plan for Executive Employees.

Motion: Carried Unanimously with Mayor Velto absent
6

14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmembers announced various activities and events throughout the community.

15. CITY MANAGER

16. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tern Maust adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m. The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is Monday, June 8, 2026.

Keri Johnson, City Clerk
7

MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE UPLAND CITY COUNCIL June 1, 2026
4:00 p.m.

SPECIAL WORKSHOP
Council Chamber
City Hall, 460 N Euclid Avenue
Members Present: Mayor Bill Velto, Councilmember James Breitling, Councilmember Carlos A. Garcia, Councilmember Rudy Zuniga
Members Absent: Councilmember Shannan Maust
Staff Present: Assistant City Manager Stephen Parker, City Clerk Keri Johnson

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The special meeting of the Upland City Council was called to order by Mayor Bill Velto at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Upland City Hall.

Moved by: Councilmember Zuniga
Seconded by: Councilmember Breitling
Excuse the absence of Councilmember Maust.

Motion: Carried Unanimously with Councilmember Maust absent

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Lois Sicking, Upland, spoke regarding parks and requested that the Council refrain from reallocating park revenues designated for park funding to the General Fund in upcoming budget years

3. AGENDA ITEMS
a. PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2026-28 BIENNIAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET
Assistant City Manager Arrula and Deputy Public Works Directors Gonzalez and Gordon presented the proposed CIP Biennial Budget along with a PowerPoint presentation and answered questions from the Council.

4. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Velto adjourned the workshop at 5:13 p.m. The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is Monday, June 8, 2026
Keri Johnson, City Clerk
1

c
F °ptq�d "OFUPLAND
"The City of Gracious Living"
ir
FOR�1 ✓ Cam', SEC()
`� N
G
DATE: May 26,2026 Date (e/AND ADOP�-I
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Item ON
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER NO• .1
PREPARED BY:ROBERT D.DALQUEST,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

JOSHUA WINTER, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO.4 TO THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN UPLAND SPECIFIC PLAN (HDUSP)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and hold first reading by title only,waive further reading and introduce an Ordinance adopting Specific Plan Amendment No. 25-0003 (Amendment No. 4) to the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan as shown in Exhibits A,B and C to the Ordinance; and determine that the proposed Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of ensuring the historic character and economic vitality of Historic Downtown Upland is protected,preserved and enhanced as a valuable resource of the community.

BACKGROUND
The recent adoption of the Housing Element Rezoning Program included 530 East 9th Street which changed to Citrus Transportation District. The site was previously designated Pleasant View District, which is a single-family designation,and contains a nonconforming auto repair business and three multiple-family units.Due to the site being adjacent to single-family dwellings,a component of the Amendment is incorporating new development standards into the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan (HDUSP) to address this issue. The Citrus Transportation District permits greater residential density and increased building height compared to the adjacent single-family Pleasant View District. Accordingly, the proposed development standards are intended to establish clear expectations for building scale,architectural design,and site layout,ensuring that future development on the site is compatible with surrounding uses and contributes positively to the character of the area.

In addition,the Planning Division proposes additional amendments to the HDUSP,to address other provisions within the Specific Plan that warrant refmement based on staff's ongoing implementation of the HDUSP. The HDUSP explicitly provides that"any provision of this Specific Plan that is determined by the Development Services Director to need refmement or revision will be corrected by amending this Specific Plan as soon as is practical"(Page 9-10).

Given that development activity within the Citrus Transportation District (located around the Downtown Train Station)is imminent,the other components in the specific plan amendment are necessary to address potential negative outcomes.

At its meeting on April 22,2026,the Planning Commission of the City of Upland recommended that the City Councill of the City of Upland approve Specific Plan Amendment No.25-0003.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
As mentioned above,the need for these standards arises from the recent inclusion of the property located at 530 E.9th Street into the Citrus Transportation District. As shown in Images 1 and 2 below, the site fronts on 9th Street and is bordered by the Pleasant View District to the north,east, and west.The Citrus Transportation designation allows for increased residential density and greater building heights compared to the adjacent Pleasant View District,which is characterized by lower-density,older single-family residential development.

The subject site is a 0.48-acre parcel previously designated within the Pleasant View District and rezoned to the Citrus Transportation District to facilitate redevelopment and accommodate higher-density residential development. As mentioned earlier,the site is currently developed with an automotive repair use and older residential structures and is located adjacent to a recently approved 111-unit residential project to the south and is adjacent to existing multi-family

apartments to the east.Furthermore,under the previous Pleasant View standards,the site would have been limited to approximately two single-family residential dwellings,making redevelopment economically infeasible. Given these factors, the Planning Division is proposing additional development standards for the Citrus Transportation District, specifically applying to properties along 9th Street.These standards will ensure that future development is compatible with the character of the surrounding Pleasant View neighborhood.

ImagII
e 1
'i. I wilt,-. -_, .� -•—•••-..ate .
narg
i ,, 6 4 .... r, - I i ,7
H, . .
.., ,
0 ,_
, ,
i.
iii,
ip r -I ; H - - L., ‘ . l'i
'' 11 Lill
-.fir.. :. _ it::: .,ram -
tjk. ‘ 1, , 7, :;.1r) ,. ik=4--,,,, 4 3 71 , __
__. kc'
AMill
ii No.
1 "
. L11414a
tos I'
E f- h 11111171ffill
Image 2
Z III W I.
pilt

4.1. Mill:

I
111Lk &1.1u1i 'lIIi
U111/111 ► r
Z
H
The proposed standards establish clear requirements related to:
a. Building height limitations within proximity to 9th Street,restricting development within 50 feet of the right-of-way to a maximum of two(2)stories and 30 feet in height to ensure compatibility with adjacent single-family homes;
b. Setbacks and street edge design standards,including a minimum 20-foot front setback along 9th Street, 5-foot side and rear setbacks, and allowance for limited architectural encroachments (e.g., porches, stoops,and bay windows)to maintain a consistent residential streetscape;

c. Restrictions on vehicular access from 9th Street,prohibiting driveways,garage doors,and vehicle access points,and requiring all access to be provided from alleys,side streets,or internal drive aisles to preserve neighborhood character and minimize conflicts;
d. Architectural design requirements, mandating incorporation of Craftsman-style elements such as low- pitched roofs,exposed rafter tails,covered porches,and the use of varied façade materials(e.g.,siding, shingles,brick,or stone),while prohibiting blank or stucco-only facades; e. Massing and articulation standards, requiring façade modulation for building elevations exceeding 30 feet in width through offsets, changes in roof planes,varied materials,and window patterns, as well as upper-story design features such as step-backs,dormers,or recessed balconies to reduce perceived bulk; and
f. Building orientation and pedestrian design standards,requiring primary entrances to face 9th Street and incorporation of porch elements and pedestrian-oriented features to reinforce a residential scale and active street frontage.

These standards are specifically tailored to ensure that new development within the Citrus Transportation District transitions appropriately to the adjacent single-family Pleasant View District,minimizing potential impacts related to privacy,scale,and neighborhood character. Complete proposed development standards are included under Exhibit A to the draft ordinance.

Definitions Update and Land Use Clarification
As part of the proposed amendment to the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan(HDUSP),staff is recommending updates to the "Definitions" section to clarify existing terminology, introduce new land use categories and ensure future regulation is adequate.

The existing HDUSP definitions include a range of traditional land use terms, however, several uses currently operating or proposed within Downtown Upland are not clearly defined, leading to ambiguity in application and enforcement of the HDUSP. The proposed amendment introduces refined, as well as, new definitions, including "Unique Retail" and "Brewery (Craft Brewery/Microbrewery)". The amendment also proposes revised existing definitions for"Light Industrial", "Restaurant" and"Bar or Nightclub"to better reflect modern business types and evolving economic activity within the downtown area

1. Unique Retail
• Existing Definition: No definition. Retail uses are currently regulated under"Retail Store, General," which broadly includes a wide variety of merchandise and store types. • Proposed Definition: A retail establishment that offers specialty, handcrafted, locally produced, or niche goods,or provides a distinct customer experience that contributes to the character and vitality of a pedestrian-oriented commercial district. Unique retail uses are typically independently operated or small-scale businesses that differentiate themselves from formula or general retail through product type, design,presentation,or customer interaction. The Development Services Director shall determine on a case by case basis if a proposed retail use fits within this definition.

This definition introduces a new land use category that distinguishes specialty or niche retail uses from general retail,allowing for greater control over tenant mix and supporting the character of Downtown Upland.

Recent applications involving retail uses that blur the distinction between permitted and non-permitted uses have demonstrated the need for additional clarification.This use category will also be added to the land use chart and require an Administrative Use Permit within the districts retail use is allowed, including Euclid District, Old Town District, Historic Core District, Arrow Highway District and the Citrus Transportation District.

2. Distillery/Brewery(Craft Distillery/Craft Brewery) • Existing Definition:No definition.Breweries are currently interpreted under restaurant or bar/nightclub categories depending on operational characteristics.

• Proposed Definition: A facility engaged in the production,fermentation,distillation,and/or packaging of beer, ale, spirits, or other alcoholic beverages that includes a public tasting room or taproom as the primary use, with production activities serving as an accessory component to support on-site consumption. Such establishments may include accessory uses such as retail sales of packaged beverages, merchandise, and limited food service,provided that the establishment primarily functions as a tasting room open to the public. All production, fermentation, distillation, storage, and packaging activities shall occur entirely within an enclosed building and shall be operated in a manner that does not generate excessive noise,odors,or other impacts incompatible with surrounding commercial,residential, or mixed-use properties within the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan area.

The new definition establishes a clear hybrid use classification and differentiates breweries and distilleries from bars and restaurants, while adding operational standards to ensure compatibility. In addition, staff has received new inquiries regarding this use in addition to the existing ones located in the Downtown, therefore, the addition of the land use classification will provide clearer direction for staff and future businesses. This use category will also be added to the land use chart, and an Administrative Use Permit will be required within the districts where the use is allowed,including Euclid District,Old Town District,Historic Core District,Arrow Highway District and the Citrus Transportation District.

3. Light Industrial
• Existing Definition: "Any office and industrial uses that produce minimal traffic, noise, odors, or pollutants.Permitted land uses include light manufacturing,assembly,processing and office." • Proposed Definition: A small-scale manufacturing, fabrication, processing, assembly, or repair use conducted entirely within an enclosed building and designed to be compatible with a pedestrian-oriented commercial district. Such uses shall be limited to operations that generate minimal traffic, noise, vibration, dust, smoke, odors, glare, or other environmental impacts and that do not adversely affect adjacent commercial, residential, or mixed-use properties. Typical uses may include artisan manufacturing, small-scale product assembly, food production or packaging, printing and publishing, furniture making or repair,technology fabrication or repair,studio workshops or maker spaces,research and development activities,and office uses associated with the industrial activity.All operations,storage, and processing shall occur within an enclosed building,and outdoor storage of materials or equipment is prohibited.Truck deliveries or freight movements shall be limited to no more than five(5)truck trips per day, excluding standard parcel delivery vehicles, or further limited by the Development Services Director. Uses shall not generate excessive noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, glare, or hazardous emissions detectable beyond the property boundary and shall be compatible with the historic character and pedestrian-oriented environment of the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan area, including compliance with applicable design and operational standards. Heavy manufacturing, warehousing, distribution centers,trucking terminals,recycling facilities,and similar high-impact industrial uses shall not be permitted.

The new definition provides a clearer picture as to what is,and what is not permitted by adding measurable operational limits and performance standards, ensuring compatibility with the downtown environment. In addition, the use is currently listed as"Permitted"within Euclid District,Arrow Highway District and the Citrus Transportation District.

The Land Use Chart, Table 5-1, will also be modified to require an Administrative Use Permit for Light Industrial uses to ensure greater control over potential future locations and businesses in the Downtown area.

4. Restaurant(Full-Service,Sit-Down)
• Existing Definition: "A restaurant where food is customarily prepared on the premises and food orders are taken by and served to patrons by a waiter or waitress while the patron is seated at a table or dining counter located inside the restaurant."
• Proposed Definition:A bona fide eating establishment whose primary use is the preparation and service of meals to the public for on-premises consumption.The establishment shall maintain a fully equipped kitchen located on the premises and a dining area with tables and seating for customers.Meals shall be available and served during all hours the establishment is open for business. The sale of alcoholic beverages may occur in conjunction with the service of meals and shall be incidental to the restaurant use. At no time shall alcoholic beverage sales substantially exceed fifty percent (50%) of the

establishment's total gross sales.An establishment with a Type 48 ABC license shall not be considered a restaurant under this definition. Establishments operating as bars, nightclubs, or drinking establishments where the primary activity is the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages are not considered restaurants.

5. Bar or Nightclub
• Existing Definition: "Any bar, cocktail lounge, dancehall or similar establishment that provides live entertainment in conjunction with alcoholic beverage sales, and that is not part of a larger restaurant.

Includes bars,taverns,pubs and similar establishments where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages."
• Proposed Definition: A commercial establishment where the primary purpose is the sale and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages.Entertainment,dancing,music,or social drinking may be provided as principal activities. Any food service offered shall be incidental and subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages. Alcoholic beverage sales shall constitute the principal business activity of the establishment and may exceed fifty percent (50%) of the establishment's total gross sales. Such establishments commonly operate under licenses issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control authorizing on-sale alcoholic beverage service for drinking establishments,including but not limited to a Type 40 (On-Sale Beer),Type 42(On-Sale Beer&Wine—Public Premises),Type 48(On-Sale General—Public Premises),or Type 61(On-Sale Beer—Public Premises) License or similar license type. The possession of an alcoholic beverage license shall not by itself determine land use classification;the operational characteristics of the establishment shall control." The new defmitions introduce objective standards to clearly distinguish restaurants from bars,improving consistency in land use classifications and enforcement. Restaurant uses have previously blurred the distinction between what constitutes a bar and what constitutes a restaurant,particularly in cases where alcohol sales and entertainment become the primary focus of the business. The proposed definitions establish measurable criteria, including limitations on alcohol sales and clarification of primary business activity,to ensure that establishments are classified based on their operational characteristics rather than solely on licensing or self-identification. This distinction is important because restaurants are permitted by right within the Euclid District,Old Town District,Historic Core District,Arrow Highway District, and Citrus Transportation District, whereas bars require a Conditional Use Permit; additionally, if alcohol sales are proposed in conjunction with a restaurant, an Administrative Use Permit is required. By clearly defining these uses,the City can better regulate the uses.

All definitions are shown in Exhibit B in the draft ordinance.

Terminology Consistency Updates
In addition to new definitions,several terminology updates are proposed to ensure consistency with the current Upland Municipal Code(UMC),including:
• Replacing "Minor Conditional Use Permit" with "Administrative Use Permit" to reflect current City terminology and streamline permit classifications.
• Replacing"Second Dwelling Unit"with"Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)", consistent with State law and the UMC.

These updates will be included in Table 5-1 and improve internal consistency across City regulations and reduce confusion for applicants and staff.All Table 5-1 modifications are shown in Exhibit C to the draft ordinance.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the common sense exemption. The amendment consists of updates to definitions, terminology, and development standards, and does not approve or authorize any specific development project.The proposed regulations are administrative and regulatory in nature and will not result in any direct physical change to the environment.Additionally,the amendment does not increase allowable density or intensity beyond what has previously been approved but instead introduces standards to ensure compatibility with adjacent development.

Therefore,it can be seen with certainty that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Determine to be Exempt.

ORDINANCE NO. 2011

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. SP-25-0003, (AMENDMENT NO. 4)

AMENDING THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN UPLAND

SPECIFIC PLAN TO ADD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
FOR PROPERTIES ALONG EAST 9TH STREET, UPDATE

DEFINITIONS AND LAND USE TERMINOLOGY, REVISE

PERMIT CLASSIFICATIONS, AND AMEND THE
PERMITTED LAND USE TABLE (TABLE 5-1) AS SHOWN

IN EXHIBITS A, B AND C
WHEREAS, The City of Upland Planning Division has initiated proceedings to modify the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, For Specific Plan Amendments, Upland Municipal Code (UMC) Table

17.43-1 identifies the decision-making authority as the City Council, with the Planning Commission being a recommendation body; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 25-0003 will not conflict with the goals, policies, and implementation measures set forth in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Specific Plan Amendment application is for text changes only, no physical development is proposed; and
WHEREAS, the project is considered a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; and WHEREAS, This amendment is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (California Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.), pursuant to State CEQA Regulation §15061(b)(3) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)), the common sense exemption covering activities with no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Division on April 17, 2026, posted two (2) true and correct copies of the legal notice at the Upland City Hall Bulletin Board and at the Upland Public Library in accordance with the UMC §17.46.020; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Division on April 17, 2026, published a 1/8 page display ad consistent with the requirements under UMC §17.46.020 (B)(2), in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local paper of general circulation, indicating the date and time of the public hearing in compliance with state law concerning the Project; and WHEREAS, The City of Upland Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on April 22, 2026, at which time it received public testimony concerning the

Ordinance No. 2011

Project, and considered the CEQA for the proposed project, and recommended the City Council approve the project with certain modifications; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland City Clerk on May 14, 2026, published a legal notice in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, consistent with UMC §17.46.020 (B)(2), a local paper of general circulation, indicating the date and time of the public hearing in compliance with state law concerning the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on May 26, 2026, at which time it received public testimony concerning the Project, and considered the CEQA for the proposed project; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites for the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation. The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

SECTION 2. CEQA. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (California Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.), pursuant to State CEQA Regulation §15061(b)(3) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)), the common sense exemption covering activities with no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 3. The proposal is in conformity with the following General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies and Specific Plan Goals and Policies.

1. General Plan Goal FA-8 "The historic character and economic vitality of Historic Downtown Upland is protected, preserved and enhanced as a valuable resource of the community."
Consistency: The proposed amendments support this goal by introducing refined land use definitions and development standards that promote high-quality, context- sensitive development. The architectural and design standards ensure that new development is compatible with the historic character of the surrounding area, while the updated definitions facilitate a diverse and economically viable mix of uses. Together, these updates help preserve the character of Downtown Upland while supporting continued reinvestment and economic vitality.

2. Specific Plan Policy 1.1.1 "New development shall be attractive, complement the form, scale and architectural style of adjacent buildings and promote harmony in

Ordinance No. 2011

the visual relationships and transitions between new and older buildings so that it appears a part of the evolutionary development of Downtown." Consistency: The proposed development standards establish building height limits, setbacks, and architectural design requirements, including Craftsman-style elements and material variation, to ensure that new development along 9th Street complements the scale and character of the adjacent Pleasant View single-family neighborhood. These standards promote a cohesive visual transition between new higher-density development and the surrounding lower-density residential area.

3. Specific Plan Policy 1.1.3 "New development shall incorporate sufficient articulation and character-defining features to carry out the chosen architectural style and ensure that the development project reinforces the pedestrian scale and uses high-quality materials and colors."
Consistency: The proposed standards require façade articulation, variation in building materials, roofline modulation, and pedestrian-oriented design elements such as porches and street-facing entrances. These requirements ensure that future development maintains a pedestrian scale, incorporates high-quality materials, and reflects a cohesive architectural style consistent with the Specific Plan.

4. Specific Plan Policy 3.1.1 "The City shall support a diverse mix of uses in Downtown, including entertainment, restaurant, office, residential, specialty stores and neighborhood-serving uses."
Consistency: The proposed updates to the Definitions section, including the introduction of uses such as "Unique Retail" and "Brewery", support a broader and more clearly defined mix of uses within Downtown. These updates provide regulatory clarity and facilitate a diverse range of compatible commercial and mixed-use activities, consistent with the Specific Plan's goal of promoting economic vitality and a vibrant downtown environment.

SECTION 4. Ordinance: Specific Plan Amendment. The Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A, B and C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Ordinance No. 2011

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty(30) days from its adoption.

SECTION 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Upland, pursuant to all legal requirements.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 2026.

Bill Velto, Mayor
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland held on the 26th day of May, 2026, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland held on the 8th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

J DEVELOPMENT CODE
j. Properties fronting on East 9th Street- Development Standards

1. Building Height
a. Buildings located within 50 feet of the 9th Street right-of-way shall not exceed:
i. Two (2)stories, and
ii. 30 feet in overall height.

2. Street Edge & Setback Requirements
a. Minimum front setback along 9th Street shall be 20 feet.Architectural features, such as porches, stoops, bay windows may extend up to 4 feet into the front yard setback. b. Minimum side yard setback shall be 5 feet.
c. Minimum rear yard setback shall be 5 feet.
d. Porches, stoops, and pedestrian entries are encouraged along 9th Street to maintain a residential street rhythm.
e. No parking, garage doors, or vehicle access shall be permitted in the required front setback area.

3. Vehicle Access & Circulation
a. No vehicle access, driveways, or garage entrances shall be allowed from 9th Street. b. Existing drive approaches along 9th Street shall be removed at the time of any new development project, major redevelopment project, or the establishment of a new use. c. All vehicular access for parcels facing 9th Street shall occur from:
i. Side streets, or
ii. Alleys, or
iii. Internal drive aisles (if part of a larger subdivision).

4. Architectural Compatibility
a. All new development adjacent to 9th Street shall incorporate Craftsman-style architectural features, including:
i. Low-pitched gable and/or hip roofs with varied roof lines ii. Exposed rafter tails and decorative brackets
iii. Deep covered porches and recessed entries
iv. Earth-tone, natural, or muted color palettes
v. Window groupings consistent with Craftsman proportions b. Stucco-only façades are prohibited; façades must include at least two materials, such as:
i. Horizontal lap siding
ii. Shingles
iii. Brick or stone detailing
5-34.1 City of Upland Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan

J DEVELOPMENT CODE
iv. Fiber-cement or wood clapboard
c. Mechanical, electrical, or rooftop equipment shall be fully screened and out of public view.

5. Massing &Articulation
a. Buildings along 9th Street must break up façades exceeding 30 feet in width through:
i. Offsets of a minimum of 2 feet,
ii. Changes in roof planes,
iii. Varied materials, and
iv. Window pattern variation.

6. Upper stories must include design techniques that reduce perceived height, such as:
a. Step-backs,
b. Dormers,
c. Roof pitch changes,
d. Balcony recesses.

7. Buffering & Privacy Protection
a. A landscaped buffer of 10 feet minimum shall be installed between multifamily development and any adjacent single-family parcel.

8. Noise & Mechanical Equipment Placement

9. Mechanical units, trash enclosures, and tenant service areas shall be located away from 9th Street and adjacent single-family properties.

10. Porch/Door Orientation
a. Require buildings facing 9th Street to include:
i. Primary pedestrian entrances facing the street
ii. Craftsman porch forms
5-34.2 City of Upland Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan

Development Code
H. Definitions
This section provides definitions of terms and phrases used in this Downtown Code that are technical or specialized, or that may not reflect common usage.

If any of the definitions in this section conflict with definitions in the Unified Development Code or other provisions of the UMC, these definitions shall control for the purposes of this Development Code. If a word is not defined in this section, or in other provisions of the UMC, the Development Services Director shall determine the correct definition.

Definitions, "A".

A-Frame sign. A portable sign that is designed to stand independently and is intended to attract pedestrians into shopping areas.

Accessory building. A detached subordinate building or a portion of the main building, the use of which is customarily incidental to that of the main building or to the primary use of the land, and which is located on the same lot as the main building or primary use.

Accessory building (habitable). An accessory building, other than a second dwelling unit, which is designed and intended to be regularly used for the purposes of living,sleeping and eating.

Accessory building (nonhabitable). An accessory building which is not designed or intended to be regularly used for the purposes of living, sleeping, or eating.

Accessory Structure, Temporary. A portable, collapsible, or otherwise impermanent structure made of canvas,vinyl,aluminum,wood, metal,or similar materials;subject to the provisions of the UMC.

Accessory use. A use incidental to, related to, appropriate and clearly subordinate to the primary use of the lot or building,which accessory use does not alter the primary use of the lot or building or adversely affect other properties in the area.

Adaptive reuse. The conversion of historic or culturally-significant buildings 5-78 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code 3
from their original or most recent use to a new use.

Affordable housing. Housing that costs no more than 30 percent of a household's monthly income. That means rent and utilities in an apartment or the monthly mort-gage payment and housing expenses for a homeowner should be less than 30 percent of a household's monthly income to be considered affordable.

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-79

Development Code
Alcoholic beverage sales. The retail sale of any alcoholic beverage for off- premise consumption.

Alley. A public or private way, at the rear or side of property, permanently reserved as a means of secondary vehicular and pedestrian access to abutting property.

Animal sales and services (boarding). An establishment that performs on- premise medi-cal and non-medical care of animals, including animal grooming, with overnight care or boarding of animals.

Animal sales and services (non-boarding).An establishment that performs on- premise medical and non-medical care of animals, including animal grooming, without any over-night care or boarding of animals.

Architectural feature. Any portion of the outer surface of a structure, including the kind, color and texture of the building material; the type and style of all windows, doors, lights, signs, walls, fences, awnings, canopies, screens, sculptures, decoration, roof shape and materials; and other fixtures appurtenant to the essential elements of a structure, such as an antenna, tower or chimneys attached to a rooftop.

Automated teller machine (ATM). A computerized, self-service machine that is used for financial transactions such as deposits, withdrawals and fund transfers.

Automotive service related use. A retail or service commercial place of business engaged in the supplying of goods and services associated with the operations and maintenance of motor vehicles and the fulfilling of motorists fleet needs, including, but not limited to, the following: the sale of motor fuels or petroleum products; the per-formance of major or minor automotive maintenance and repair; the sale and servicing of tires, batteries, automotive parts and accessories, and audio-video components and equipment; car washing and oil lubrication services; and the supplying of other incidental customer services and products.

Awning sign. A sign painted onto the canvas or valance of an awning. 5-80 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
Definitions, "B".

Bank or financial services. A financial institution such as a bank, credit agency or lending institution.

Bar or nightclub. A commercial establishment where the primary purpose is the sale and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages. Entertainment, dancing, music, or social drinking may be provided as principal activities. Any food service offered shall be incidental and subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages. Alcoholic beverage sales shall constitute the principal business activity of the establishment and may exceed fifty percent (50%) of the establishment's total gross sales. Such establishments commonly operate under licenses issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control authorizing on-sale alcoholic beverage service for drinking establishments, including but not limited to a Type 40 (On-Sale Beer), Type 42 (On-Sale Beer & Wine — Public Premises), Type 48 (On-Sale General — Public Premises), or Type 61 (On-Sale Beer — Public Premises) License or similar license type. The possession of an alcoholic beverage license shall not by itself determine land use classification; the operational characteristics of the establishment shall control.

Beauty salon or barbershop. An establishment providing personal services, such as hairdressing, manicuring, facial treatment, and massage.

Bed and breakfast. An owner- or manager-occupied residence that provides more than five guest rooms.

Block. A parcel of land bounded on all sides by public streets, highways, freeways, railroad rights-of-way, flood control channels, creeks, washes, rivers or acreage unsub-divided into urban lots, or any combination thereof.

Business support services. An establishment within a completely enclosed building that provides services that are necessary to other businesses, such as blueprinting, computer rental and repair,copying, mailing and mailbox services, messenger services,and tem-porary employment.

Building. A permanently located structure having a roof (all forms of vehicles excluded.)
Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-81

Development Code
Definitions, "C".

Canopy sign. Any sign placed on or supported entirely by a rigid or nonrigid shelter or other structure projecting out from any exterior wall or portion of a building or other structure; or any sign attached to or suspended under any rigid or nonrigid portion or support of a building or other structure.

Commercial recreation (indoor). Any establishment that provides indoor entertain-ment activities as a primary use for a fee or admission charge, including archery ranges, billiard halls as a primary use, bowling alleys,electronic game arcades with four or more machines, shooting galleries, and skating rinks.

Does not include establishments such as bars or restaurants that offer live entertainment, dancing, gaming tables or machines to their customers. Does not include gymnasiums and similar facilities, which are consid-ered "health/fitness facilities." Does not include adult businesses.

Commercial recreation (outdoor). Any establishment that provides outdoor entertain-ment activities for a fee or admission charge, including amusement parks, miniature golf courses and swimming pools. Does not include facilities operated by a public agency, which are considered "park or recreational facilities" regardless of whether they require a fee or admission charge.

Convenience store. A retail store of 3,500 square feet or less in gross floor area, which carries a range of merchandise oriented to daily convenience and travelers feet shop-ping needs.

Cultural use (assembly). An auditorium, theater or similar indoor facility that is open to the public and is used primarily for religious services, films, performances or presenta-tions. Includes churches, civic theaters, facilities for live theatrical performances, and concert and movie theaters. Does not include facilities for sporting events, which are considered "commercial recreation." Does not include adult businesses.
5-82 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
Cultural use (non-assembly). A facility that is open to the public and presents, displays, or exhibits material of cultural interest that are typically available throughout the day, such as an art gallery, aquarium, library, museum or zoo.

Definitions, "D".

Day care center (small). Any facility that provides non-medical care and supervision of less than 15 minor children for periods of less than 24 hours; that does not qualify as a family day care facility; and that meets the licensing requirements of the State.

Day care center (large). Any facility that provides non-medical care and supervision of 15 or more minor children for periods of less than 24 hours;that does not qualify as a family day care facility; and that meets the licensing requirements of the State.

Designated cultural resource. See definition in the UMC.

Development, New. The establishment of a new land use; the construction of a build-ing or structure, and all alterations to existing site improvements or structures.

Development intensity. The number of dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for resi- dential development and the floor-area ratio (FAR) for non-residential development. Residential density is calculated by dividing the total number of dwelling units by site acreage. Density shall be calculated on a project-wide basis.

Floor-area ratio (FAR) is defined as the floor area of the building divided by the total project site area.

Distillery/Brewery (Craft Distillery / Craft Brewery). A facility engaged in the production, fermentation, distillation, and/or packaging of beer, ale, spirits, or other alcoholic beverages that includes a public tasting room or taproom as the primary use, with production activities serving as an accessory component to support on-site consumption. Such establishments may include accessory uses such as retail sales of packaged beverages, merchandise, and limited food service, provided that the establishment primarily functions as a tasting room open to the public. All production, fermentation, distillation, storage, and packaging activities shall occur entirely within an enclosed building and shall be operated in a manner that does not generate excessive noise, odors, or other impacts incompatible with surrounding commercial, residential, or mixed-use properties within the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan area.

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-83

Development Code
Dwelling unit. An integrated assembly of one or more rooms, in addition to a kitchen and bathroom, in a dwelling or apartment house designed for or occupied by one family for living or sleeping purposes, and containing only one kitchen.

Dwelling unit, multi-family residential.A development that provides multiple attached or detached dwelling units for occupancy by more than one family either on a single parcel of land, such as apartment complexes, or within a subdivision, such as condominiums and planned unit developments.

Dwelling unit, single-family residential. A detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete, independent living facilities on a single parcel of land, is designed for occu-pancy exclusively by one family, and has direct vehicular and pedestrian access from a public roadway.

Definitions, "F".

Fully shielded (full cutoff) luminaire. A luminaire emitting no light above the horizontal plane.

Definitions, "G".

Gas station. Any building or site used primarily for the retail sale and dispensation of motor fuels, lubricants and motor vehicle accessories, and the rendering of services and minor repairs to vehicles, not including painting, body work or fender work. A gas sta-tion may include food and beverage sales, as well as a car wash, as an accessory use.

Glare. Intense and blinding light that causes visual discomfort or disability.

Government office. Any office development used primarily for government business or operations.

Grocery store. A commercial development that includes one or more of the following uses: grocery department, meat market,drug department, liquor sales department, fruit and vegetable department, and sections or departments for 5-84 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
the sale of incidental items of a convenient type.

Definitions, "H".

Hanging sign.A sign suspended from or supported from a building or structure project-ing out there from more than 1 foot.

Health/fitness facility. A fitness center, gymnasium, or health and athletic club, which may include any of the following: free weights; a swimming area, sauna, spa or hot tub facilities; indoor tennis, handball, racquet ball, archery or shooting ranges and other indoor sport activities.

Height. The vertical distance measured from the adjoining curb level to the highest point of the structure, exclusive of chimneys and ventilators; provided, however, that where buildings are set back from the street line, the height shall be measured from the average elevation of the finished grade at the front of the building.

Home occupation. Any use customarily conducted entirely within a dwelling and carried on by the inhabitants thereof, which use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the structure for dwelling purposes and which use does not change the character thereof, or does not adversely affect the uses permitted in the district of which it is a part.

Hotel (limited stay). A building designed for temporary occupancy, not to exceed 14 consecutive days, by individuals in guest rooms or suites who are lodged for compensation. A limited stay hotel may include accessory uses including swimming pools and spas, gyms, meeting facilities and retail uses.

Definitions, "I".

Instructional or production studio. A small-scale establishment for the instruction or production of art,including dance, painting, photography, music,sculpture and related arts, and that provides no more than two instructional spaces or facilities for no more than 20 artists at any one time. Larger facilities shall be considered "commercial recre-ation—indoor." The term "instructional or production studio" also includes studios for gymnastics, martial arts, yoga or similar activities, provided that they do not also offer fitness equipment similar to a gym.

Definitions, "L".

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-85

Development Code
Landscape lighting. Luminaries mounted in or at grade (but not more than 3.5 feet above grade) and used solely for landscape rather than any other area lighting.

Light industrial. A small-scale manufacturing, fabrication, processing, assembly, or repair use conducted entirely within an enclosed building and designed to be compatible with a pedestrian-oriented commercial district. Such uses shall be limited to operations that generate minimal traffic, noise, vibration, dust, smoke, odors, glare, or other environmental impacts and that do not adversely affect adjacent commercial, residential, or mixed-use properties. Typical uses may include artisan manufacturing, small-scale product assembly, food production or packaging, printing and publishing, furniture making or repair, technology fabrication or repair, studio workshops or maker spaces, research and development activities, and office uses associated with the industrial activity. All operations, storage, and processing shall occur within an enclosed building, and outdoor storage of materials or equipment is prohibited. Truck deliveries or freight movements shall be limited to no more than five (5) truck trips per day, excluding standard parcel delivery vehicles. Uses shall not generate excessive noise, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, glare, or hazardous emissions detectable beyond the property boundary and shall be compatible with the historic character and pedestrian-oriented environment of the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan area, including compliance with applicable design and operational standards. Heavy manufacturing, warehousing, distribution centers, trucking terminals, recycling facilities, and similar high-impact industrial uses shall not be permitted.

Live/work. A multiple-story, independent dwelling unit, either attached or detached, with a ground floor that is designed and built to be used for non- residential purposes and accommodate the public; the ground floor is not intended to be a home office or accommodate only home-based businesses. 5-86 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
Live Entertainment/Dancing. A musical, theatrical, dance, cabaret, readings or comedy act performed by or participated in by one or more persons on a site three or more days during a calendar year. This includes disc jockeys playing recorded music and danc-ing by patrons to live or recorded music. Live entertainment does not include the term "adult entertainment facility"or"adult entertainment establishment."
Loading space. An off-street space or berth on the same lot with a main building, or contiguous to a group of buildings, for the temporary parking of commercial vehicles while loading or unloading, and which shall abut a street, alley, or other appropriate means of ingress or egress.

Luminaire (light fixture). A complete lighting unit consisting of one or more electric lamps, the lamp holder, any reflector or lens, ballast (if any), and any other components and accessories.

Definitions, "M".

Major alteration. A physical modification to the exterior of a structure or a site that is more extensive in scope than a minor alteration or has a substantial visual impact in relation to the total design of the project. Major alterations typically include changes to building massing, building height, cladding the exterior walls in new materials, and extensive replacement of windows and doors, changes to site layout or landscaping, or other features with a new or unoriginal design in a structure or site.

Marquee sign. Any sign attached to and made part of a marquee. A "marquee" is defined as a permanent roof-like structure projecting beyond a building wall at an entrance to a building or extending along and projecting beyond the building's wall, and generally designed and constructed to provide protection against the weather.

Medical or dental laboratory. A facility that provides medical, dental, mental health, surgical and other personal health services for outpatients on a walk-in basis, including urgent care facilities, as well as medical laboratories that perform X-rays and conduct testing of specimens from walk-in patients. Does not include hospitals or other facilities that provide more intensive emergency Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-87

3 Development Code
or inpatient care.

Medical or dental office. A facility that provides medical, dental, mental health, surgi-cal and other personal health services for outpatients, where appointments are typi-cally scheduled in advance rather than on a walk-in basis. May also include a medical laboratory that performs X-rays and conducts testing of specimens. Does not include hospitals or other facilities that provide more intensive emergency or inpatient care. 5-88 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
Minor alteration.A physical modification to the exterior of a structure or a site that is limited in scope or has a minor visual impact in relation to the total design of the proj-ect. Minor alterations typically include the repainting of existing buildings and structures and the installation of or replacement of awnings, landscaping, lighting fixtures, roofing, limited portions of building materials, minor mechanical equipment, new storefront systems, and walls and fencing.

Mixed-use development. A development that provides both residential and nonresi-dential uses on the same site. It may include a vertical mix of uses, with dwelling units located above nonresidential uses,as well as a horizontal mix of uses, with dwelling units located adjacent to or behind nonresidential uses.

Monument sign. A low-profile freestanding sign connected to the ground with a solid base, and which reflects and complements the architectural theme of the buildings on the same property.

Motel (limited stay). A building designed primarily for the temporary accommodation of transient automobile travelers, not to exceed 14 consecutive days, by individuals in guest rooms or suites who are lodged for compensation.

Multi-family residential. A development that provides multiple attached or detached dwelling units within one subdivision for occupancy by more than one family. This may include, but is not limited to, condominiums, apartment complexes, and planned unit developments.

Definitions, "0".

Obtrusive light. Spill light that causes glare, annoyance, discomfort, or loss of visual ability. Light Pollution.

Definitions, "P".

Park or recreational facility. A non-commercial, outdoor recreational facility that is open to the general public and provides active or passive recreational opportunities.

Parking space. Any area which is usable and accessible for parking for one motor vehicle. A parking space excludes driveways, ramps, columns, loading areas, and office, laundry or work areas.

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-89

3 Development Code
Parking- structured. Any off-street parking structure that is available for public parking or storage of vehicles, whether for free or for compensation. Does not include parking that is designated for a specific business or group of businesses. 5-90 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
Parking- surface. Any off-street lot that is available for public parking or storage of vehicles, whether for free or for compensation. Does not include parking that is desig-nated for a specific business or group of businesses.

Personal services. An establishment other than a "professional office" that provides services to individuals as a primary use, and that may sell products related to these services as an accessory use, including dry-cleaning services, landromats, clothing rental, home electronics and small appliance repair, shoe repair shops, and tailors.

Plaque sign. A small version of a wall sign that is attached to surfaces adjacent to shop front entries.

Professional office. An establishment providing direct, "over-the-counter" services to consumers (e.g., insurance agencies, real estate offices, travel agencies, utility company offices, etc.) and office-type facilities occupied by businesses providing professional services and/or engaged in the production of intellectual property. This use does not include Banks and Financial Services.

Projecting sign.Any sign other than a wall sign affixed to any building or wall,a portion of which extends beyond such building or wall by more than 1.5 feet.

Projections and encroachments. Architectural elements of a building that may project into required setback areas or encroach into the public right-of-way as specified for each district. Projections and encroachments may include architectural features (cornices, eaves, chimneys, bay windows, mechanical equipment, roof overhang, etc.), awnings, canopies, porches,stoops, balconies, bay windows, fences, hedges and landscape archi-tectural features, as specified for each district.

Public Art. Works of art, such as street sculpture, murals and lighting, as well as the design of street furniture and surfaces to improve the public realm and contribute to the character and identity of a place.

Public facility. A facility operated by a public agency for the purpose of carrying out public services and operations, such as a police station or library.

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-91

3 Development Code
Definitions, "Q".

Qualified street frontage. The width of the storefront of a non-residential development fronting on a thoroughfare. In cases of corner or through lots, only one street frontage may be used as qualified street frontage for purposes of calculating permitted sign area.
5-92 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
Definitions, "R".

Residential care facility. Any family home, group care facility or similar facility for 24-hour nonmedical care of persons in need of personal services, supervision or assis-tance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. Includes convalescent homes, self-help group homes, non-hospital type care for the mentally and physically handicapped, or drug abuse facilities.

Restaurant (fast food). A restaurant where food is customarily ordered by patrons while standing at a window or counter located inside a building and where food is con-sumed on or off the premises. This use does not include drive-through establishments.

Restaurant (full-service, sit-down).A bona fide eating establishment whose primary use is the preparation and service of meals to the public for on-premises consumption. The establishment shall maintain a fully equipped kitchen located on the premises and a dining area with tables and seating for customers. Meals shall be available and served during all hours the establishment is open for business. The sale of alcoholic beverages may occur in conjunction with the service of meals and shall be incidental to the restaurant use. At no time shall alcoholic beverage sales substantially exceed fifty percent (50%) of the establishment's total gross sales. An establishment with a Type 48 ABC license shall not be considered a restaurant under this definition. Establishments operating as bars, nightclubs, or drinking establishments where the primary activity is the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages are not considered restaurants.

Restaurant sign. A sign that incorporates a menu containing a listing of products and pricing offered by a business.

Retail store, general.A retail establishment that sells a variety of merchandise and is not otherwise identified in this chapter as a unique retail use, including antique stores, appli-ance and electronics stores, beauty supply stores, bicycle stores with incidental repair, bookstores, camera shops with incidental developing, drugstores, ice cream stores, department stores, dressmaking shops, hardware stores, florists, picture frame shops, retail bakeries, upholstery shops and any use of like kind or character.

Retail Store, Unique. A retail establishment that offers specialty, handcrafted, locally produced, or niche goods, or provides a distinct customer experience that contributes to the character and vitality of a pedestrian-oriented commercial district. Unique retail uses are typically independently operated or small-scale Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-93

Development Code
businesses that differentiate themselves from formula or general retail through product type, design, presentation, or customer interaction. The Development Services Director shall determine on a case by case basis if a proposed retail use fits within this definition.

Definitions, "S".

School. Any public or private, grade or secondary school which offers instruction in the several branches of learning and study required to be taught in the public schools by the Education Code of the state of California,and including high schools, junior high schools and elementary schools.

Second dwelling unit. An attached or detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. A second dwelling unit shall be of a permanent character and shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the permitted single-family main dwelling is situated.

Senior housing. A residential development that provides multiple dwelling units for occupancy exclusively by senior citizens.

Setback. The minimum required distance between any structure and a specified line such as a lot, public or private right-of-way, easement, future street right-of-way or buf-fer line that is required to remain free of structures unless otherwise specified herein.

Sidewalk café. An area adjacent to an existing street level eating establishment within the area of the public right-of-way that is established in conjunction with the use of the abutting property for dining, drinking and circulation therein. A sidewalk cafe may provide either waiter or waitress service or self-service.

Sign. Any device, fixture, surface, or structure of any kind or character, displaying let-ters, words, texts, illustrations, symbols, forms, patterns, colors, textures, shadows, or lights, or any other illustrative or graphic display designated, constructed, or placed on the ground, on a building canopy, wall, post or structure of any kind, in a window, or on any other object for the purpose of advertising, identifying, or calling visual attention to any place, structure, firm, enterprise, profession, business, service, product, commodity, 5-94 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
person or activity, whether located on the site, in any structure on the site, or in any other location.

Sign area. The entire area within a rectangle or series of rectangles enclosing the extreme limits of writing, representation, emblem, or any figure or similar character, together with any frame or other material or color forming an integral part of the dis-play or used to differentiate such sign from the background against which it is placed; excluding the necessary supports or uprights on which such sign is placed, and superfi-cial, nonilluminated column covers, ornamental trim, and other such incidental objects attached thereto which are not designed to convey a message; and excluding a reason- able amount of nonencompassed open area.

Single-family residential (attached or detached). A residential dwelling unit that pro-vides complete, independent living facilities on the property, is designed for occupancy exclusively by one family, and provides direct vehicular and pedestrian access from the roadway.

Specialty food store. A retail establishment that sells only specialized types of foods. This includes but is not limited to imported food stores and general retail stores that specialize in products other than consumable products. A specialty food store is not a grocery store that sells a wide variety of common staple food items to qualify for government supplemental nutrition programs.

Spill light. Light from a lighting installation that falls outside the boundaries of the prop-erty on which it is located. Usually results in obtrusive light.

Street. A public thoroughfare or right-of-way dedicated, deeded or condemned for use as such, other than an alley which affords the principal means of access to abutting property including an avenue, place, way, drive, lane, boulevard, highway, road and any other thoroughfare, except as Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-95

Development Code
excluded in this Specific Plan.

Structure. Anything which is constructed or built, any edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts jointed together in some definite manner.

Structural alterations. Any change in the supporting members of a building, such as in a bearing wall, column, beam or girder, floor or ceiling joists, roof rafters, roof diaphragms, roof trusses, foundations, piles, or retaining walls or similar components.

Definitions, "T".

Temporary sign. Any sign constructed of wood, paper, cloth, canvas or other similar lightweight material, with or without frames, and all others, including painted windows intended to be displayed for a limited period of time.

Tenant directory sign. A sign on which the names and locations of occupants or the use of a building is given.

Townhouse or townhome. A single-family dwelling with party walls and no side yards between abutting dwellings.

Transparency. The percentage of a wall that is transparent. Ensuring a pedestrian-friendly street frontage requires buildings containing retail, office, or other active ground-level uses to provide a minimum percentage of street wall transparency, in order for these uses to get the amount of visibility required for healthy business operation. The percentage of ground floor transparency is specific to certain uses and must follow the standards defined for each district.

Definitions, "U".

Urgent care facility. A facility dedicated to the delivery of medical care outside of a hospital emergency department, usually on an unscheduled, walk-in basis.
5-96 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Specific

Development Code
Use. The purpose for which land or a building is arranged, designed, or intended, or for which either land or building is or may be occupied or maintained.

Used Merchandise. A retail establishment that sells a variety of secondhand merchan-dise, including thrift and antique stores, but excluding pawn shops.

Definitions, "W".

Wall sign. Any sign painted on or attached to and erected parallel to the face of, or erected and confined within the limits of, the outside wall of any building and supported by such wall or building, and which displays only one advertising surface.

Window sign. An advertising sign painted, attached, glued or otherwise affixed to either the exterior or interior side of a window, having copy visible from a public street, right-of-way or parking lot.

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of 5-97

I DEVELOPMENT CODE
Table 5-1 Permitted Land Uses
Key to Permit Requirements P=
Permitted Use
4 C=Conditional Use Permit Required 2 3 U
LE 1- 2 .

A=Administrative Use Permit Required LE O w x
3 a = a 3 a 1 a = a = a = a a Cs' a
ILo a o a o a o a o a o a o a o a o a o a
0 CD CD CD CD CD C7 CD CD CD Residential
Multi-family Residential P P p2 P P P P PPP PPPP P Residential Care Facility P P P P
Accessory Dwelling Unit12 PPPP
Senior Housing P P P P P P PPP PPPP P
Single-Family Residential P P P P P3 P3 P P Institutional
Cultural Use(Assembly) A A A A A A A A A A AA A A Cultural Use(Non-Assembly) P PP P P P PP PP PP P P Government Office P PP P P P PP PP P PP
Park or Recreational Facility P P P P P PP P 41 P P Public Facility P PP P P P PP PP PPP P
School CCCCCCCC CCCCCC
Commercial
i
Adult Business Subject to Chapter 17.20 of the Municipal Code Alcoholic Beverage Sales(Off-Site, 25%GFA C CC CCC CC C C devoted to sale of alcohol)
Animal Sales&Services(boarding) P P P P P Animal Sales&Services(non-boarding) P PP P P P PP P P ATM PPPPPPPP PPPP
Bank or Financial Services P Ir PP P P PP P P Bar or Night Club C CC C C C CC C C
Commercial Recreation/Entertainment (indoor) P PP P P P PP P P Commercial Recreation/Entertainment (outdoor) P P P P P P Convenience Store P PP P P P PP P P
Distillery/Brewery A A A A A A A A A A
Grocery Store P PP P P P P P P
Health/Fitness Facility Pr P P P PIP P P P P Pi L Instructional or Production Studio P PP P P P PP P PI I Live Entertainment/Dancing4 C CC CC C CC C C Personal Services(excluding salon/barbershop) P PP P P P PP P P Restaurant(fast food,excluding drive-through) P PP P A A PP P P Restaurant(full service,sit-down,serving no P PP P P P PP P P� alcohol)
1 DEVELOPMENT CODE

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan I City of Upland 5-4

Table 5-1 Permitted Land Uses (Continued)
Land Us- Permitted Uses by District
L
Key to Permit E
Requirements P=
o
Permitted Use
c.

C=Conditional Use Permit Required
m=Minor Conditional Use Permit
Required
-c a1 c a1 c a1 c a c a c a c a cI c iu c a0 = o_ = o_ = o_ = o_ = o_ = o_ = o_ = = o = no o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 1 ° 0 ° C1 ° 0DODODODO )
CD D
Commercial(Continued) _ _
Restaurant(full service,sit-down,serving alcohol) A AA A AA A A A A Retail Store,General PP PP PP PP P P
Retail Store,Unique A A AA AA A A A A
Salon/Barbershop A A AA AA A A A A
Sidewalk Cafes P P P P
Specialty Food Store PP PP PP PP P P
Unique Retail A A AA AA A A A A
Office/Professional
Business Support Services PP PP P PPP P P P
Medical or Dental Laboratory P PA P P P P C C Medical or Dental Office PP PP P P P P P Urgent Care Facility P P P P
Home Occupation6 P P P P P P P PP PP PPP PP Professional Office PP PP P P P P P
Other
Accessory Uses(habitable) P P P P P P P P P P P P Accessory Uses(nonhabitable) P P P P P P P P P P P P Bed&Breakfast' PP PP P P P
Day Care Center-Small C C C CCCC
Day Care Center-Large C C C C C
Hotel(limited stay) P PP PPP P P
Motel(limited stay) P
Light Industrial A A A
Live/Work6 PP PP PP PP P P
Mixed-Uses PP PP PP PP P P
Outdoor Display of Merchandise10 P P
Parking-Surface P P P P P PP P P Parking-Structured PP PP PPP P P PP PPP PP
Wireless Communication Facilities11 PP PP PPP P P P P P 'Includes 1st Avenue Overlay 'Per Chapter 17.23 of Municipal Code '1st Avenue Overlay only 'Per Chapter 17.28 of Municipal Code 3Single-Family Residential in the Residential Transit District is subject to 'All habitable areas of the ground floor shall be devoted to and constructed to the Multi-Family Residential standards in Section E.2.Detached Single- accommodate non-residential uses as permitted in Table 5-1.Residential USE Family Residential shall comprise no more than 1/3 of total shall be on upper floors only. development in the Residential Transit District.
'Either as the sole use or in conjunction with a permitted or conditionally 10Per development standards within HDUSP Section(5)(F)(9) permitted use.
6Per Chapter 17.32 of Municipal Code Per Chapter 17.40 of Municipal Code 6Per Chapter 17.27 of Municipal Code 'Per Chapter 17.37 of Municipal Code

5-10 City of Upland I Historic Downtown Upland Spotific Plan

4®,r�UPt9�d CIOF U P L AN D
a _ Staff
/� T/, "The City of Gracious Living o VC/
DATE: May 26,2026 Ord ND READING
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NO• �7 pate �� AND ADOPT FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER f (s It
e IGN
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,CPA,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER m No. /((

STACI SULLIVAN,FINANCE MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.04 REGARDING POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council hold a first reading by title only, waive further reading, and introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 2.04 of the Upland Municipal Code as follows: 1)amending Section 2.04.070 subsection C and 2)adding Section 2.04.070 subsection D.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of ensuring that the Upland Municipal Code("UMC")is consistent with State Law and compliments current City practices,regulations,and policies.

BACKGROUND
Section 2.04.070 of the Upland Municipal Code establishes the powers and duties of the City Manager,which includes delegated authority to approve and execute certain"no cost" contracts on behalf of the City. The current ordinance authorizes the City Manager to approve and sign contracts for equipment,materials, supplies,and services provided the expenditure is authorized in the adopted budget and does not exceed$50,000 for any one vendor in the same fiscal year.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Staff have identified opportunities to clarify the application of the City Manager's contracting authority and improve administrative efficiency for lower-dollar operational agreements. The proposed ordinance amends Section

2.04.070(C)to clarify that the City Manager's$50,000 contracting authority applies by project/event within the same fiscal year.The ordinance also adds a new subsection 2.04.070(D)authorizing Department Heads to approve and sign contracts up to $25,000 for budgeted expenditures, subject to reporting requirements to the City Manager and City Council.

Staff believe the proposed amendments will improve operational efficiency while maintaining appropriate fiscal oversight and accountability.

The proposed ordinance is intended to clarify administrative contracting authority and improve the efficiency of routine City operations while maintaining oversight and reporting requirements.

The amendment to Section 2.04.070(C) clarifies that the City Manager's existing $50,000 signing authority applies on a"by project/event"basis for any one vendor or professional during the same fiscal year.This clarification provides clearer guidance for the administration of contracts associated with separate projects,events,or operational activities and improves project-level accountability and expenditure tracking.

The proposed addition of Section 2.04.070(D) authorizes Department Heads to approve and sign contracts up to $25,000, provided the expenditures are authorized within the adopted budget. The proposed authority is limited in scope and includes administrative safeguards requiring Department Heads to notify the City Manager following contract execution and requiring the City Manager to continue providing monthly reports to the City Council regarding executed contracts.

The proposed amendments are intended to reduce administrative delays associated with lower-dollar routine contracts and operational purchases while preserving City Council oversight through the annual budget process and ongoing

reporting requirements. The ordinance does not authorize additional appropriations or expenditures beyond those approved by the City Council through the adopted budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

ORDINANCE NO. 2012

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
UPLAND, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 OF

THE UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE

POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CITY MANAGER
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 40602 permits city councils to authorize city officers other than the mayor to enter into written contracts on behalf of the city; and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously amended Chapter 2.04 of the Upland Municipal Code to authorize the City Manager to approve and sign certain contracts on behalf of the City when the expenditure is authorized in the current budget and the contract amount does not exceed $50,000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that clarifying the application of delegated contracting authority by project or event will improve contract administration and operational efficiency; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further desires to authorize Department Heads to approve and sign certain contracts not exceeding $25,000 when the expenditure is authorized in the current budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that limited Department Head contracting authority, subject to City Manager notification and City Council reporting requirements, will improve administrative efficiency and maintain oversight and transparency; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2, Section 2.04.070 of Chapter 2.04 of Title 2 of the Upland Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"2.04.070. Powers and duties.

A. The city manager shall be the administrative head of the government of the city under the direction and control of the city council except as otherwise provided in this code. The city manager shall be responsible for the efficient administration of all the affairs of the city which are under his or her control.

In addition to his or her general powers as administrative head, and not as limitation thereon, it shall be his or her duty and he or she shall have the powers set forth in Sections 2.04.080 through 2.04.200, inclusive.

B. Under Government Code Section 40602(b), the mayor is vested with the

Ordinance No. 2012

authority to sign all written contracts and conveyances made or entered into by the city while the city council may provide by ordinance that written contracts and conveyances may be signed by an officer other than the mayor. Therefore, the city manager may sign any written contract or conveyance on behalf of the city whenever the city council so authorizes the city manager by motion or resolution subject to such condition or limitation that the city council may impose upon such authority to the city manager.

C. The city manager also may approve and sign a contract on behalf of the city for the purchase of equipment, materials, supplies or services provided the expenditure for same is authorized by the current annual budget and the contract amount does not exceed $50,000.00 for any one vendor or professional, by project/event, in the same fiscal year. Additionally, the city manager may also approve and sign contracts between the city and other government agencies and non-profit organizations that are "no cost" to the city and do not impose or assume any liability to the city that it would not otherwise have in the absence of the contract. The city manager shall notify the city council in writing at least once per month of the execution of any contracts executed by the city manager for the city.

D. Department heads may approve and sign contracts on behalf of the city for the purchase of equipment, materials, supplies or services provided the expenditure is authorized by the current annual budget and the contract amount does not exceed $25,000.00 for any one vendor or professional, by project, in the same fiscal year. Department heads shall notify the city manager in writing immediately following the execution of any contracts in accordance with this subsection. The city manager shall notify the city council in writing at least once per month of contracts executed in accordance with this subsection."
SECTION 3. Certification. City Clerk of the City of Upland shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

SECTION 4. CEQA. The Mayor and City Council finds this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision,

Ordinance No. 2012

paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance shall not be affected.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Upland, pursuant to all legal requirements.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 2026.

Bill Velto, Mayor
City of Upland
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland held on the 26th day of May, 2026, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Upland on the 8th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

���4°F °p`qt CI TFUPLAND
.�, 1` "The City of Gracious Living"
ltiriiVO
''' 5 oid.

DATE: June 8,2026
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: CONSIDER RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council ratify the Mayor's appointment of Owen Egger and Jesse Juarez to the Library Board of Trustees,terms expire June 30,2029.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to provide opportunities for the citizenry to participate in local government through service on various committees,commissions,and boards.

BACKGROUND
The Library Board of Trustees (Board) was created by ordinance in 1913 and the composition and terms of office were amended pursuant to California Library Laws in 1990. The Board is charged with providing materials and staff assistance for meeting the information and educational needs of library users.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54972,the expiring terms of commission,committee,and board members were duly posted prior to December 31,2024. Appointments to the Board are for three year terms.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 40605 and Resolution No.6818 the Mayor shall appoint the Committee,Board, and Authority members subject to the ratification by a majority of the Council.

The Mayor has chosen to appoint Owen Egger and Jesse Juarez to the Board.Both have submitted applications and expressed their desire to serve in this capacity.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

� 01 trAr
44 'n R4'

0. { - _. d City of Upland
rzi,j 7 . , ,..- Public Service Application for Commissions, oq-tr �1q. Committees, or Boards
I am applying to serve on the following commission, committee, and/or board.

Upland Library Board
Name: Owen Egger, Ed.D.

Home Address: Upland, CA 91786
Primary Phone: Secondary Phone:

Email Address:

Which district do you live in?
❑ District 1 ❑ District 3
District 2 ❑ District 4
Current occupation: Middle School Teacher and Makerspace Manager Professional/educational background:

I have served for the last five years as a teacher and makerspace manager. Here, I have designed, managed, and instructed unique maker space programs designed to align our middle schoolers' learning with the needs of the Inland Empire's workforce. I hold a Doctorate in Educational Leadership from Alverno College and a Master's in EdTech from Boise State University.

Why are you interested in serving on a commission, committee, or board? I want to bring my unique training, experience, and insights to the City of Upland's Library Board because of my love for the education of all people, no matter their age.

As a patron of the library, I am excited by the resources and education it affords to Upland's residents and I want to do my part to help our community continue to grow and develop.

Describe any other skill experience that you possess that will qualify you for the commission, committee, or board desired:

I have designed a library learning curriculum at the Ontario Public Library for children and their parents to gain key contemporary skills via makerspace resources. I also taught at Zoo Boise in Idaho, where I learned about the value of places like zoos and museums for the public. My doctoral dissertation was a case study on the educational pedagogy and resources at 9/11 Memorial & Museum in NYC. Finally, I spent time as a legislative intern to State Senator Connie Leyva, where I learned the importance of aligning constituent needs with public initiatives.

List three (3) community references:

1. NAME:James Hammond, Ed.D. PHONE

2. NAME:Felix Melendez, Ed.D. PHONE

3. NAME:Johnny Anderson PHONE.

On a separate sheet please answer the following:

What do you feel are the most important issues facing the City of Upland? (300 words or less)
I declare, under penalty of disqualification and termination, that all statements in this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further declare that if I am appointed, I will serve fairly, impartially, and to the best of my ability.

I am available at the time of the regularly scheduled meetings of the commission, committee, or board to which I am applying.

I further acknowledge that information contained in this application is a public record and may be subject to public inspection pursuant to the California Records Act (CA Gov. Code § 6250 et seq.). Applications are kept on file in the City Clerk's office for a period of three years.

Signature:_ _ Date: 03/24/2025
I read and understand the above statement
Please return your completed, signed application to [email protected] or submit to:

City of Upland
Office of the City Clerk
460 N Euclid Ave
Upland, CA 91786
Unsigned applications will not be accepted.

|
!
!
�
| believe the most important issues facing the City of Upland are a need for meaningful, ' forward-thinking education and training for children and adults, the funding gap for public � infrastructure, and problems surrounding homelessness, safety, and law enforcement.

Education and Training for Children and Adults � - �
/\s8middle school educator in the Inland Empire, I've seen the challenges that have arisen for _ both children and adults in the 2020s in being able to access education and training that is not only sufficient for navigating through the N-12 school avetenl, but also for attaining meaningful i employment in our post-COVID world. According to the city's 2019 Comprehensive Annual | Financial Report, the two top employers by numbers of employees are San Antonio Community � Hospital and Upland Unified School District. These entities both serve our community and are reliant on employees who are suitably trained to support residents in both the best and worst - times of their lives. Educational opportunities in the City of Upland need to be readily available � �
' for citizens of all ages to be able to gain the experience, skills, and specialized knowledge to � benefit their own community.
�
�
Funding Gap For Public Infrastructure / �
|
` |tiGDO secret that U residents have resisted taxation to fund the city's0eed to ' rehabilitate its roadways and enhance mobility for its citizens. Allocating and responsibly | handling funding for public infrastructure—whether it be from citizen-approved taxes or local or � c4UOtva�V[��a. rn�Gtb8Gprioritvfn[ Up\@nd �aitnODtinu�otodSve|Op �nd0GiOb8iOitSS�du� � ' ' ' |
as 8 place to live and work in the Inland Empire. � -
Homelessness, Safety, and Law Enforcement '
83h3tvh}[RU [jti��D�vviU 8|xv@y� b� G priority |i�� Upland. Education and ngS0urC�� � ' - �
toward law enforcement and tackling homelessness will help Lhd city continue h} serve and � protect its residents. i
` .
!
!
'
'
'|
i
�
|
i
'
|

SZOZ C SdkJ
V313 &UO atuidn mad
„, ov
!P„4,
tO Pk` ,VZ-AN0 City of Upland
,at,-A 741
Public Service Application for Commissions,
trot, Committees, or Boards
I am applying to serve on the following commission, committee, and/or board.

Library Board
Name: Jesse Juarez
11111111111.1
Home Address: pland, 91786
Primary Phone: 111111.11111__Secondary Phone:

Email Address: 1111.11
Which district do you live in?
all District 1 El District 3
LI District 2 El District 4
Current occupation: Social Worker/Adjunct Professor
Professional/educational background:

Ed.D, MSW, B.S
I am currently employed at CSUSB and serve as the student affairs social worker. I am also an adjunct professor in the addiction studies program.

Why are you interested in serving on a commission, committee, or board? I am interested in serving on a library board position because i want to serve the city and also ensure that library services are being provided equitably. The services that the libary provides is essential to the learning of the residents and it exposes learners to acquire knowledge.

Describe any other skill experience that you possess that will qualify you for the commission, committee, or board desired:

For the last 10 years i have worked in education. I also speak, read and write Spanish.

List three (3) community references:

1.. NAME:Ricky Hollings
PHONE:

2. NAME:Norma Gabriel
PHONE:

3. NAME:Sandy Hall
PHONE:

On a separate sheet please answer the following:

What do you feel are the most important issues facing the City of Upland? (300 words or less)
I declare, under penalty of disqualification and termination, that all statements in this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further declare that if I am appointed, I will serve fairly, impartially, and to the best of my ability.

I am available at the time of the regularly scheduled meetings of the commission, committee, or board to which I am applying.

I further acknowledge that information contained in this application is a public record and may be subject to public inspection pursuant to the California Records Act(CA Gov. Code § 6250 et seq.). Applications are kept on file in the City Clerk's office for a period of three years.

Signature: Date: 4/ 3 /2-5
ir-ad and undrrd the al).4atement
Please return your completed, signed application to [email protected] or submit to:

City of Upland
Office of the City Clerk
460 N Euclid Ave
Upland, CA 91786
Unsigned applications will not be accepted.

Upland Committee Document
I believe that some of the more pressing issues for the City of Upland are the ongoing issues of homelessness. The library serves as a place of security and as a resource for our residents. The city has made significant strides regarding the issues of homelessness and the collaboration that was developed with the police department has assisted many of our unhoused residents. I believe that many of our residents are at risk for homelessness due to economic uncertainty and the need to inform the community about the resources available to them is imperative. In addition to the primary services that the library offers, providing accessible information regarding community resources will help families stay housed or it can help a homeless family attain stable housing. Many consider the library to be a safe space, and it can be used to disseminate information regarding city or county services.

Working in educational environments has provided me with valuable insight regarding the access to education and how community resources such as the library can nurture learning or expand learning opportunities for our older residents. The service for libraries is expanding to meet the needs of all residents including our homeless residents. Establishing collaborative partnerships can help to mitigate the unhoused dilemma and meet the needs of our residents.

Working collaboratively with community partners can help to address the unhoused issue

4c, °v °p`q� CITFUP LAND
�" - -
.�, �` "The City of Gracious Living"
c�lrFOR�i�
DATE: June 8,2026
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: CONSIDER RATIFICATION OF AN APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT TO THE

PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council ratify the Mayor's appointment of Michael Couper and the reappointment of Brian Staton to the Planning Commission,terms ending June 30,2030.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to provide opportunities for the citizenry to participate in local government through service on various committees,commissions,and boards.

BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission was established in 1930 pursuant to the Planning Act of 1929. Changes to the Commission were later made in 1950 in accordance with the Conservation and Planning Act. The Planning Commission is comprised of seven members, appointed by the City Council, to review and act on matters related to planning and development. Resolution No. 6818 sets forth the process for appointment and states the Mayor shall appoint the Committee,Commission,Board,and Authority members subject to ratification by the majority of the Council.

The positions to be filled on the Planning Commission are regularly scheduled vacancies with a term that will expire on June 30, 2026. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54972, the expiring terms of the Planning Commission members was duly posted prior to December 31,2025.

At the regular meeting of the City Council on April 13, 2026, the Council formed an ad hoc committee, appointing Mayor Velto and Mayor Pro Tem Maust to serve on the ad hoc committee and conduct Planning Commission interviews.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
A total of 18 applicants were contacted for interviews. Ultimately 11 applicants were scheduled for interviews; however,two did not attend,resulting in the following nine candidates being interviewed:
• German Aparicio Jr.
• Michael Couper
• Robert(Bob)Johnson
• Jennifer Mendez
• Michael Miller
• Stan Oklobdzija
• Carl Schulz
• Gary Schwary
• Brian Staton
Interviews were conducted by a panel consisting of Mayor Velto,Mayor Pro Tem Maust, and Planning Commission Chair Andrews (advisory only) and Development Services Director Dalquest(advisory only). At the conclusion of the interviews, Michael Couper and Brian Staton were ranked as the top candidates using a forced choice ranking system.Based on the interview rankings,the Mayor has chosen to appoint Michael Couper and reappoint Brian Staton to the Planning Commission.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

City of Upland
-! � Public Service Application for Commissions, n� Malik Committees, or Boards
I am applying to serve on the following commission, committee, and/or board.

Planning Commission
Name: Michael Couper
Home Address: Upland, CA 91784
Primary Phone: Secondary Phone.

Email Address:

Which district do you live in?
District 1 El District 3
❑ District 2 ❑ District 4
Current occupation: Business Owner (HDU, District 4)
Professional/educational background:

Owner and CEO, CCS Interactive; Co-Founder and CTO, Lendrose, Inc.

Incoming Treasurer, Exec Board, Upland Chamber of Commerce; Vice President, HDU Board; Board Member, Upland Police Foundation; Professor, University of Redlands; Doctorate of Musical Arts from USC Why are you interested in serving on a commission, committee, or board? I have been an Upland resident for 16 years and have operated a business in Downtown Upland for 5 years. Through service on local boards, I value thoughtful, balanced decision-making. I seek to ensure land use decisions are consistent with the City's plans, legally sound, and reflect the needs of residents and businesses.

Describe any other skill experience that you possess that will qualify you for the commission, committee, or board desired:

As a business owner, I regularly evaluate complex decisions that require balancing competing priorities, long-term strategy, and practical constraints. My doctoral training developed strong research and analytical skills. Through board service and community involvement, I engage with diverse stakeholders, review detailed reports, and make decisions grounded in policy, evidence, and community impact. 1 focus on ensuring consistent standards, asking informed questions, and applying sound reasoning.

List three (3) community references:

1. NAME: Gail Marie Horton-Treser PHONE

2. NAME:Terri Galdo PHONE

3. NAME: Chief Marcelo Blanco PHONE
On a separate sheet please answer the following:

What do you feel are the most important issues facing the City of Upland? (300 words or less)
I declare, under penalty of disqualification and termination, that all statements in this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further declare that if I am appointed, I will serve fairly, impartially, and to the best of my ability.

I am available at the time of the regularly scheduled meetings of the commission, committee, or board to which I am applying.

I further acknowledge that information contained in this application is a public record and may be subject to public inspection pursuant to the California Records Act (CA Gov. Code § 6250 et seq.). Applications are kept on file in the City Clerk's office for a period of three years.

Signature: Date: `3 /A/7/t.

I read and understand the above statement
Please return your completed, signed application to [email protected] or submit to:

City of Upland
Office of the City Clerk
460 N Euclid Ave
Upland, CA 91786
Unsigned applications will not be accepted.

City of Upland Planning Commission Application
Addendum
Michael Couper
March 24, 2026
What do you feel are the most important issues facing the City of Upland? (300 words or less)
Upland has a strong foundation, but there are a few clear gaps. Downtown has good restaurants and does well during events, but there isn't enough to keep people there once they've finished a meal or to draw them in on a regular basis. There are some anchors like Axe Lair and live music, but we're missing consistent activity-based uses, things families or groups can plan around during both the day and evening.

Along Foothill and Central, there's an opportunity to bring more consistent foot traffic to businesses that are currently underutilized.That area sits at the edge of multiple cities and could realistically pull people in with the right mix of uses. It also represents one of the better opportunities for additional housing, which would help support those businesses and create more built-in activity.The incoming Amazon distribution center will add pressure on traffic, but it also creates an opportunity to think more intentionally about how that part of the city develops around it.

Upland also lacks hotel options. The Foothill corridor, Colonies, and Downtown could support them in different ways: the Colonies for more traditional, business-oriented stays, and Downtown for something that complements its local character.Alternative options to boutique and higher-end hotels in Claremont could would be well-suited to the Foothill corridor to take advantage of proximity to local colleges and athletic facilities.

Overall, the challenge is making practical decisions that strengthen these areas in a consistent, long-term way without creating unintended impacts.

d Q�-•�Pt
City of Upland
: Public Service Application for Commissions,
(11-Cxkild7 Committees, or Boards
I am applying to serve on the following commission, committee, and/or board.

Planning Comrnision
Name: Brian Staton
Home Address: Upland, CA. 91786
Primary Phone: Secondary Phone.

Email Address:

Which district do you live in?
❑ District 1 rd District 3
❑ District 2 District 4
Current occupation: Chief Executive Officer- Architectural Practice Professional/educational background:

Bachelor of Architecture
40+ years in architecture, planing, design, and construction.

Why are you interested in serving on a commission, committee, or board? I enjoy being part of the community that I live in and bring a diverse set of skills through my career in architecture, planning, design, and community involvement. Giving back is important to me.

Describe any other skill experience that you possess that will qualify you for the commission. committee, or board desired:

I feel that I have brought great insight and knowledge as an current Planning Commisionor. I am active with Upland Heritage and other philanthropic work I do with other organizations, bring diverse perspective to our community

List three (3) community references:

1. NAME:Steve Potter PHONE

2. NAME: Jon Richardson PHONE

3. NAME:Katie Parker PHONE
On a separate sheet please answer the following:

What do you feel are the most important issues facing the City of Upland? (300 words or less)
I declare, under penalty of disqualification and termination, that all statements in this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further declare that if I am appointed, I will serve fairly, impartially, and to the best of my ability.

I am available at the time of the regularly scheduled meetings of the commission, committee, or board to which I am applying.

I further acknowledge that information contained in this application is a public record and may be subject to public inspection pursuant to the California Records Act (CA Gov. Code § 6250 et seq.). Applications are kept on file in the City Clerk's office for a period of three years.

Signatur Date: 0410812026
I read and understand the above statement
Please return your completed, signed application to [email protected] or submit to:

City of Upland
Office of the City Clerk
460 N Euclid Ave
Upland, CA 91786
Unsigned applications will not be accepted.

BRIAN STATON
Upland, California 91786
City of Upland April 8th,2026

UPLAND CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
important Issues Facing the City of Upland
The city has many areas that we (Planning Commissioner's) need to continue to support the great work the Planning Department is doing to bring more business into the city, new developments, and zone changes to keep the city relevant and progressive. Some of these improvements help our tax base, which needs help. I feel that there is an opportunity for the Planning Commissioner's to help support measures that financial strengthen the city with developments and maintenance.

Thank You,
1111111

,.., Up`q� CITYUPLAND
. ` "The City of Gracious Living"
DATE: June 8,2026
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: BIENNIAL REVIEW OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to review the code and submit notice that either an amendment is required or no amendment is necessary.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to comply with State regulations.

BACKGROUND
The Political Reform Act of 1974,Government Code Section 81000 et seq.,requires all public agencies to adopt and maintain a conflict of interest code. The primary effect of the code is to establish disclosure requirements for various government positions involved in the requisite level of decision-making as set forth in the Act.The Act requires each city to adopt a local conflict of interest code designating city positions not otherwise designated in the Act itself,that are involved in making or participating in the making of city decisions at all levels of city government.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The Act further requires that agencies,including cities,regularly review and update their codes as necessary as directed by their code-reviewing bodies or when change is necessitated by change of circumstances (Gov. Code Sections 87306,87306.5).The last update was completed in 2024. The City Council is the code-reviewing body for the City's Code and must direct the biennial review of its Conflict of Interest Code.The Act also requires that the City Manager file a statement regarding the results of the review no later than October 1 of the same year.If a change in the Code is necessitated by this review,it must be submitted to the City Council for approval within ninety(90)days of the filing of the Local Agency Biennial Notice with the City Clerk(Gov.Code Sections 87303,87306.5).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

����°� °p`q� CITY
�r. .__. ..` "The City of Gracious Living" ltiriiVO
''' 5 oid.

DATE: June 8,2026
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:KERI JOHNSON,CITY CLERK

JENNIFER RODRIGUEZ,DEPUTY CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept the resignation from City Council Advisory Committee Member Monica Marroquin and direct the City Clerk to post the notice of unscheduled vacancy.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to provide opportunities for the citizenry to participate in local government through service on various committees,commissions,and boards.

BACKGROUND
The City Council Advisory Committee (Committee) reviews any matters which may be referred to the Committee from time to time. Additionally, the Committee is responsible for reviewing Community Development Block Grant Committee applications; and presenting grant distribution recommendations to the City Council. Additionally, the Committee evaluates the circumstances of City Manager declared mass casualty or mass disaster incidents and provides recommendations regarding fund distribution.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Ms. Marroquin submitted her resignation to the City Clerk's office on May 29,2026. Ms.Marroquin was appointed to the Committee in February 2023 and was nominated by Councilmember Garcia.The term of the appointment will expire in December 2026.

The resignation creates an unscheduled vacancy and Government Code Section 54974 requires vacancies be posted for ten(10)working days before new appointments can be made.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

����°� °p`-, CITYUPLAND
�r. .__. ..` "The City of Gracious Living" ''' 5 oid.

DATE: June 8,2026
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:STEPHEN PARKER,CPA,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

STACI SULLIVAN,FINANCE MANAGER
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ALLOCATION PLAN, UPDATED SOLID WASTE COST

ALLOCATION AND UPDATED ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY FOR SELF-FUNDED

LIABILITY
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council 1) receive and file an update on the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cost Allocation Plan; 2) receive and file an update on the allocated costs for additional services under the Amended and Restated Agreement with Burrtec Waste Industries,Inc;3)approve a budget amendment from the Solid Waste Utility Reserve Fund balance in the amount of$225,000 to cover the reallocation of costs related to pressure washing and porter services; 4) receive and file an update on the proposed allocation methodology for the City's Self-Funded Liability Internal Service Fund; and 5)approve the General Fund savings realized by the updated allocation methodology for the Self-Funded Liability Insurance Fund from Fiscal Years 2023-24,2024-25,and 2025-26 to be applied towards the budget deficit in Fiscal Years 2026-27 and 2027-28.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to provide fiscal stewardship for the City of Upland.

BACKGROUND
A Cost Allocation Plan ("CAP") is a financial management tool used by cities to identify and allocate the cost of central support services to the departments,programs,and funds that benefit from those services.The City periodically updates its CAP to reflect current operations, staffing, budgets, and fund activity. Staff retained Willdan Financial Services to prepare the Fiscal Year 2025-26 CAP.

The CAPs completed by the City of Upland include both an Office of Management and Budget("OMB")/2 CFR Part 200 compliant model for federal awards and other reimbursement-based programs,and a full cost model for standard City operations and budgeting. Both models use the same general methodology. However, the federal-compliant model excludes certain costs that are not allowable under federal cost principles.

The Self-Funded Liability (SFL) Internal Service Fund accounts for costs associated with the City's self-funded insurance programs,including general liability,property insurance,and workers' compensation.

On April 29, 2026, a recommended adjustment to the SFL allocations was reviewed and supported by the Finance Committee. The Finance Committee requested that staff determine if the methodology change could be applied retroactively-not just to the current and previous fiscal year as staff recommended,but also back to Fiscal Year 2024-

25. On May 18,2026,the methodology change was discussed as part of staff's presentation of the Biennial Budget at the Special City Council Meeting.

As part of the Fiscal Year 2026-27—2027-28 biennial budget("Biennial Budget")process,staff identified three areas where updates to the allocation of costs should be updated. The first related to the citywide Cost Allocation Plan, which is regularly updated. The second related to additional services provided under the City's Amended and Restated Agreement ("Agreement") with Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. ("Burrtec"). The third relates to the methodology of allocating insurance costs for the City's Self-Funded Liability Internal Service Fund("SFL").

Fiscal Year 2025-26 CAP
The CAP is used to support budget development, internal cost recovery, grant reimbursement, and other cost-based financial decisions. Because City operations, staffing,budgets, and fund activity change over time,periodic updates to the CAP are a prudent practice to maintain accurate and equitable cost allocations.

Reviewing and updating the CAP regularly is sound fiscal policy and ensures that all funds are paying their fair share for the impact they have on the central services provided by General Fund employees and facilities. These central support functions benefit multiple departments and funds.Without a documented allocation methodology,those costs may remain concentrated in the General Fund even when other funds benefit from the services provided.Maintaining a current CAP helps ensure that benefiting funds bear their appropriate share of Citywide administrative costs,where legally allowable.

The FY 2025-26 CAP results in an increase of approximately$1.6 million in contributions from other funds to the General Fund. The continued growth of the Enterprise Funds, in managing operational and capital needs was the primary factor in the change, with allocations from the Water, Solid Waste and Sewer Utilities increasing by $1.3 million. These updated allocations have also been applied as part of the proposed Biennial Budget.

While not required,formal acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 CAP provides transparency and establishes a clear record of the methodology used to allocate indirect costs among City funds,departments,and programs.

Allocated Costs Allocation of Additional Burrtec Services City Council approved an Amended and Restated Agreement with Burrtec on June 27, 2022, and subsequently approved amendments on August 12, 2024, and December 9, 2024. These actions added services such as pressure washing,barrel and bin washing,porter service,and sidewalk steam cleaning.

The additional services provided under the Burrtec Agreement benefit both General Fund activities and the Solid Waste Utility. During the Biennial Budget process, staff identified that the intended allocation of costs between the funds had been calculated but not implemented for the current fiscal year or incorporated into the proposed Biennial Budget. As a result, the General Fund has absorbed the full cost of these additional services. A supplemental appropriation is necessary as these expenditures were not previously budgeted in Solid Waste Operations. The supplemental appropriation from the Solid Waste Utility Reserve Fund balance is$225,000 to cover the reallocation of costs related to pressure washing and porter services. This correction will result in a General Fund savings for the current fiscal year and has also been included in the Biennial Budget.

SFL Methodology
Through a review of the current allocation methodology,staff identified modifications to the allocation approach that would be more appropriate for certain insurance components.

The previous SFL methodology allocates costs primarily based on staffing levels or salary costs. This approach provides a reasonable and administratively straightforward basis for allocating employment-related costs, such as workers' compensation, because those costs are directly related to employment and payroll exposure. However, applying the same basis to all SFL costs does not fully account for the different factors that drive insurance exposure.

Certain costs are more closely tied to personnel,while others are more closely tied to property ownership,facility use, or fund-specific operations. As a result,the current methodology is less precise when applied to insurance costs that are not primarily driven by staffing or payroll.

Under the proposed methodology, SFL costs would no longer be allocated using a single uniform basis. Workers' compensation costs would continue to be allocated based on staffing or payroll-related measures because those costs are directly tied to employment exposure. General liability and property insurance costs would be allocated using factors that more closely reflect the source of the related risk and the fund receiving the benefit of coverage.

For general liability insurance,staff determined that each fund's proportionate share of the total City budget is a more appropriate allocation basis than staffing or salary costs alone. General liability exposure is not limited to personnel activity;it may also arise from the scale of fund operations and public-facing services supported by each fund.Because enterprise funds represent a significant share of the City's operating budget,allocating general liability costs based on budget share better reflects the scale of those fund operations and the related exposure.

For property insurance, staff determined that costs should be allocated to the fund that owns or operates the insured property, facility, or activity giving rise to the insurance exposure. This approach more directly ties the cost of

coverage to the asset or operation being insured.It also recognizes that certain non-General Fund activities,including enterprise and housing-related activities, are associated with insured assets or operations that receive the benefit of insurance coverage. By comparison, the General Fund's property exposure is more limited and generally relates to core governmental facilities and assets,such as City Hall.

The proposed methodology therefore improves the precision of SFL allocations by matching different categories of insurance cost to the factors that most reasonably drive those costs.This approach is consistent with the City's updated CAP,which uses measurable allocation factors to distribute central service costs based on the nature of the cost and the department or fund receiving the benefit. In addition to being more defensible,the revised methodology reduces the General Fund's SFL allocation and increases allocations to Enterprise and Housing Funds where those funds have a stronger relationship to the underlying budgetary or insurance exposure.

Staff consulted with the City's auditors, who did not identify any concerns with the methodology change or its application to prior fiscal years. Additionally, staff are proposing retroactive application of the methodology change to Fiscal Years 2023-24 and 2024-25,and the application of the one-time funding to be strategically applied towards the upcoming Biennial Budget to assist the City in bridging the current budget gap.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Cost Allocation Plan results in an increase in administrative fees to the General Fund of $1,451,360,including increased contributions from the Water Utility($568,464), Solid Waste Utility($374,694)and the Sewer Utility($423,973).

Once the budget amendment is approved,reallocation of costs associated with additional services provided under the Burrtec Agreement will move from General Fund Public Works Operations Account No. 1015410-5253 to the Solid Waste Utility Account No.6416301-5253. This action will result in General Fund savings of$224,413 in Fiscal Year 2025-26.

The revised SFL methodology results in General Fund savings of$844,022 for Fiscal Year 2023-24, $774,037 for Fiscal Year 2024-25, and$902,284 for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The savings realized will reduce the projected General Fund deficit by$1,020,343 in Fiscal Year 2026-27 and$1,500,000 in Fiscal Year 2027-28.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

CITY OF UPLAND
• r� � fi
L ,. f
�r
-40
11'` • . . .. .4.,„0.0,,, ,,
�r UPL /1RD Ar-
.___
i .
1 lip. , ,,.. . . . „. ,. 1
i _•. _ —a,—
- '' - AP' Pis,
r
illbionisaig-• .

Co st Allocation Plan
April 24, 2026 W I L L DA N

FINANCIAL SERVICES

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
List of Tables ii
Executive Summary 1
Introduction 4
Approach 5
Methodology 5
Applications 6
OMB Super Circular and 2 CFR Part 200 6
Central Service Departments 7
Distribution Bases 8
Allocable Costs and Distribution Bases 9 Allocable Costs 9
Central Service Allocation Methodology 10
Section 1:Accounting Services 10
Section 2: City Administration 10
Section 3: City Attorney 11
Section 4: City Clerk 12
Section 5: City Council 12
Section 6: City Treasurer 13
Section 7: Human Resources 13
Section 8: Non-Departmental 14
Section 9: Public Works Administration 15
Section 10: Public Works-Building 15
Section 11:Vacancy Credit 16
Iterative Allocation 17
Appendix A 18
Appendix B 22
try WILLDAN i Cost Allocation Plan

List of Tables
Table 1: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments (OMB Compliant CAP) 2 Table 2: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments (Full CAP) 3 Table 3: Allocable Cost Summary 9
Table A-1: Initial Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) 19 Table A-2: Final Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) 20 Table A-3: Final Allocation Amounts (OMB Compliant CAP) 21 Table B-1: Final Allocation Amounts (Full CAP) 23 WWI ii Cost Allocation Plan

rrnAp=�
Executive Summary
This cost allocation plan ("CAP")summarizes a comprehensive analysis that has been completed for the City of Upland, California (the "City") to determine the appropriate allocation of costs from central service departments to the operating departments. The primary objective is to allocate costs from departments that provide services internally to operating departments that conduct the day-to-day operations necessary to serve the community. The internal service costs typically represent (a) incurred for a common or joint purpose benefiting more than one cost objective, and (b) not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted,without effort disproportionate to the results achieved.The term "indirect costs," as used herein, applies to costs of this type originating in the central service departments.

To ensure central service department costs are appropriately allocated to the operating departments, Willdan analyzed the City's cost code structure to determine which types costs are allowable versus unallowable in accordance with standard and accepted cost allocation principles.The term "allocable costs" as used herein, applies to costs that are allowable for allocation.

The study is comprised of two separate allocation plans.Table 1 is the summary results of the allocation in compliance with the Office of Management and Budget Super Circular(the OMB Super Circular) and CFR Part 200 (Cost Principles).Table 2 that follows is the summary results of the full plan. The report below includes descriptions of the differences between the two plans,their separate purposes, and specific details of when the plans deviate from each other.

WWI 1 Cost Allocation Plan

4 ,a
,
Table 1: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments
(OMB Compliant CAP)
Allocated Cost Summary Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Direct Cost Base
Modified Total Direct Indirect Cost
Operating Department/Division/Fund Total Allocation Cost Rate $8,179,891 $128,909,011 6%
101: ANIMAL SERVICES $48,459 $864,988 6%
101: COMMUNITY SERVICES $361,887 $3,853,280 9% 101: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $432,006 $4,770,040 9% 101: FIRE $5,998 $75,570 8%
101: LIBRARY $180,700 $2,121,000 9% 101: MAIL/PRINTING SERVICES $1,835 $77,560 2% 101: POLICE $1,659,498 $34,638,962 5% 101: PUBLIC WORKS $719,478 $8,113,363 9% 201: HOUSING FUND $183,266 $3,653,066 5% 203: PUB SAFETY AUGMENTATION $144,122 $1,434,780 10% 204: GAS TAX $103,810 $966,970 11
205: MEASURE I $74,304 $365,450 20%
206: ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCOUNT $35,523 $161,720 22% 208: HOME $16,869 $730,000 2%
209: CDBG $19,773 $580,351 3%
210: PBIA $1,701 $72,980 2%
211: AIR QUALITY POLLUTION REDUCT $1,364 $34,890 4% 217: OTHER GRANTS $10,829 $315,162 3%
218: OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY $17,070 $142,382 12% 219: OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS $496 $20,960 2% 220: ASSET FORFEITURE-FED DOJ $19,644 $303,350 6% 222: CALHOME $26,990 $1,163,100 2% 229: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT $26,282 $158,046 17% 425: GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS $61,492 $236,390 26% 426: STREET&ALLEY REPAIRS-BURRTEC $8,250 $94,730 9% 640: WATER UTILITY $2,253,367 $29,237,280 8% 641: SOLID WASTE UTILITY $737,878 $20,351,389 4% 645: SEWER UTILITY $1,024,958 $14,353,952 7% 805: SUCCESSOR AGENCY $2,041 $17,300 12%
WWI 2 Cost Allocation Plan

ir,..D
Table 2: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments (Full CAP) Allocated Cost Summary Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Direct Cost Base
Modified Total Direct Indirect Cost
Operating Department/Division/Fund Total Allocation Cost Rate $10,620,581 $128,909,011 8%
101: ANIMAL SERVICES $50,034 $864,988 6%
101: COMMUNITY SERVICES $440,053 $3,853,280 11% 101: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $545,294 $4,770,040 11% 101: FIRE $6,134 $75,570 8%
101: LIBRARY $186,043 $2,121,000 9% 101: MAIL/PRINTING SERVICES $1,967 $77,560 3% 101: POLICE $3,370,886 $34,638,962 10% 101: PUBLIC WORKS $1,047,131 $8,113,363 13% 201: HOUSING FUND $194,106 $3,653,066 5% 203: PUB SAFETY AUGMENTATION $152,501 $1,434,780 11% 204: GAS TAX $107,064 $966,970 11%
205: MEASURE I $76,214 $365,450 21%
206: ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCOUNT $36,374 $161,720 22% 208: HOME $18,114 $730,000 2%
209: CDBG $21,099 $580,351 4%
210: PBIA $1,825 $72,980 3%
211: AIR QUALITY POLLUTION REDUCT $1,461 $34,890 4% 217: OTHER GRANTS $11,563 $315,162 4%
218: OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY $17,351 $142,382 12% 219: OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS $532 $20,960 3% 220: ASSET FORFEITURE-FED DOJ $20,897 $303,350 7% 222: CALHOME $28,976 $1,163,100 2% 229: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT $26,957 $158,046 17% 425: GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS $63,018 $236,390 27% 426: STREET&ALLEY REPAIRS-BURRTEC $8,711 $94,730 9% 640: WATER UTILITY $2,339,973 $29,237,280 8% 641: SOLID WASTE UTILITY $777,057 $20,351,389 4% 645: SEWER UTILITY $1,067,106 $14,353,952 7% 805: SUCCESSOR AGENCY $2,141 $17,300 12%
WWI 3 Cost Allocation Plan

e•;6
rrnAp=�
Introduction
In the early 1970s, the cost allocation plan concept was introduced to many government agencies. The purpose of a typical cost allocation plan is to identify costs related to rendering internal central support services and allocate those costs to operating departments or programs that utilize and benefit from them, in a fair and equitable manner.

Before indirect costs and central support service charges may be claimed for reimbursement by an operating department,there must be some formal means of identifying, accumulating and distributing these types of costs to all benefiting departments. Regardless of whether an agency has a formal comprehensive cost accounting system,the best method of accumulating, identifying, and determining a distribution of indirect costs is a cost allocation plan.

A City is made up of many departments, each with their own specific purposes or functions. Departments whose primary function is to provide support internally to other City departments are called central services.

Examples of central services are City Administration, City Clerk, City Attorney, Human Resources, and City Council. Within these groups there are numerous functions performed that provides support to the direct cost centers.The direct cost centers, or departments and funds,that require support from Central Services and provide services directly to the community through their day-to-day operations, are called operating departments. Examples of operating departments are Fire, Development Services, Community Services, Public Works,and Police.The Cost Allocation Plan allocates the costs of the central services to the operating departments based on the nature of the functions of each central service, upon which the operating departments depend.This is done to determine the total cost associated with providing direct services.The overall goal of the cost allocation plan process is to allow cities to allocate a portion of the central service costs to the operating departments,thus 1)accounting for"all"costs,direct and indirect,for each operating department, and 2)facilitating the calculation of a fully burdened cost estimate of providing services to the public.

The purpose of this study is to:
• Identify the central support and operating departments in the City; • Identify the functions and services provided by the central departments; • Identify allocable and non-allocable costs associated with the City's central service departments; and
• Distribute those costs to operating entities in a fair and equitable manner.

WWI 4 Cost Allocation Plan

e•;6
rrnAp=�
Approach
Methodology
The way in which each Indirect Service provides support to the operating departments is determined in order to perform allocations in a manner consistent with the nature of that Indirect Service. This ensures that the costs can be allocated to each operating department in a fair and equitable way.The Cost Allocation Plan identifies the functions of each central service department, and then determines a methodology to allocate or spread the central service costs in a manner that best represents the nature of those functions.

The mathematical representations of central service functions used to allocate indirect costs are commonly called distribution bases. A distribution basis is a set of data displayed as the level of measure of each department's participation in a specific activity or City function. This basis is then used to distribute costs that reasonably relate to the activity or City function that the basis represents. Some examples of distribution bases are salary and benefits costs, number of full-time equivalent employees, frequencies of city council agenda items, and number of processed transactions. The data sets associated with these distribution bases for each department is collected to facilitate the allocation of indirect costs.

The methodology used for this Cost Allocation Plan is the iterative method, which is one of the most equitable methods for allocating costs from central services to operating departments. While not used as prevalently as simpler allocation methods, it is widely considered to be the most accurate. The iterative method utilizes a recursive application of central service cost distribution to allocate indirect costs. In the first step,the allocable costs of central service departments are identified and distributed to all departments including the central service departments themselves, based on the appropriate allocation bases that were selected to represent the manner in which central services are utilized. This is repeated ad infinitum until all costs have been distributed to the operating departments, and none remain with the central service departments.

As an example, consider the allocation of central service costs associated with Human Resources. The function of Human Resources is identified, and the appropriate distribution basis is determined to be the total full-time equivalents and salaries and benefits per department and fund.The allowable costs are then distributed to all City departments and funds based on their proportional share of the full-time equivalents and salaries and benefits, including other central services.The costs allocated from central service to central service in the initial allocation are then allocated out using the same distribution methodology.This function is performed as many times as necessary until all costs for Human Resources has been allocated.

All central service departments are treated equally. That is to say, this method is performed concurrently for the allowable costs in each of the central service departments for each iteration until all costs associated with the central service departments have been allocated to each direct service department. The method is complete when the total amount of allocable costs remaining in the central service departments is equal to zero.

WWI 5 Cost Allocation Plan

Applications
Public agencies use cost allocation plans for many purposes such as internal accounting, the justification of user fees, application for reimbursement from federal programs or the determination of administrative effort associated with special districts and/or municipal service activities. In many of these cases,the agency will be required to certify that the costs identified are "reasonable". Per the Code of Federal Regulations, a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost.The question of reasonableness is particularly important when determining the amount that a public agency should be reimbursed for central service overhead activities associated with a federally funded program.Additionally, public agencies should consider special care to only identify the portion of central service costs that have not been reimbursed through other means (such as grants, user fee revenues, transfers from other departments or internal service funds)to avoid double-counting.These cost reductions are done before the allocation methodologies are used and are detailed within the model itself.

OMB Super Circular and 2 CFR Part 200
This report details the allocations for two separate cost allocation plans. The primary model, presented in text and tables in the below sections and in Appendix A, provides a plan that complies with the Office of Management and Budget Super Circular (the OMB Super Circular) and CFR Part 200 (Cost Principles) that are used to determine central overhead costs incurred while carrying out activities associated with Federal awards, cost reimbursement contracts and some other intergovernmental agreements (as required). The secondary model presented in Appendix B of this report is the full cost allocation plan,which the City should use for standard City operations and budgeting. Unless otherwise indicated, the details of this report and Appendix A contain the OMB compliant allocation plan. The Appendix B tables contain the full cost plan, and utilize the same distribution methodology as the OMB Compliant plan. While the overall methodology used for both plans is the same, there are specific guidelines that require additional cost exemptions for OMB Super Circular compliance outside of what was done for the full cost plan. Where such exemptions are done in the methodology has been explained below. Some commonly encountered examples that are usually exempt under OMB Super Circular guidelines are:
• General Advertising
• Bad Debt
• Contingencies
• Litigation
• Debt Service
• Entertainment
• Capital
• Lobbying
• Legislative Body(City Council)
• Promotional Items
WWI 6 Cost Allocation Plan

e•;�6
rrnAp�=�
Central Service Departments
Eleven (11) central service functions were identified for the purposes of this cost allocation plan:
• Accounting Services
• City Administration
• City Attorney
• City Clerk
• City Council
• City Treasurer
• Human Resources
• Non-Departmental
• Public Works Administration
• PW—Building
• Vacancy Credit
1►►1 WILLDAN 7
Cost Allocation Plan

e•;6
rrnAp=�
Distribution Bases
Distribution bases are the allocation factors that may be used to distribute the allocable costs to all departments and funds. As discussed previously, distribution bases are measurable and readily available data that are utilized to represent activities or functions, and which are then used to distribute costs matching that activity or function. Below are the bases that were analyzed in this study and used to allocate Central Services costs to operating departments. • City Council Agenda Frequency—City Council agendas spanning a 12-month period were used to determine the number of times each department and fund had matters brought before the City Council.
• Number of FTE Employees—The number of full-time equivalent personnel for each department and fund.
• Modified Total Direct Cost—The total allowable expenditures budgeted for each department and fund for FY2025-26 which excludes capital, all debt, and non-operational transfers. • Total Salaries& Benefits—The total salary& benefit expenditures for each department and fund for FY2025-26.
• Total Revenues—The total revenues for each department and fund for FY2025-26. • Total Building FTE Employees—The number of full-time equivalent personnel for each department and fund the Public Works—Building division maintains.
• Solar&Energy Conservation Value—The value attributed to each department and fund for the Solar and Energy Conservation projects based on location utilization.

WWI 8 Cost Allocation Plan

Allocable Costs and Distribution Bases
Allocable Costs
Table 3 identifies the allocable cost of each central service department for the OMB compliant allocation plan, with the total allocable costs for this study being$8,179,891.The total expenditures from the central service departments were $9,357,883. However, $1,177,992 of the expenditures identified as unallowable by the 200 CFR Part 200 and have been excluded from allocation. The primary exclusions were related to City Council, Lobbyist, Promotional, Advertising, Litigation, Contingency, allocation charges, and Fire PERS.

The remaining amount was distributed to the operating departments and the central services departments by distribution factor(s) that best represents the functions of each central service department and the demand placed on that central service by all City departments, as previously described in the Methodology section of this report.The allocation methodology for each central service is detailed in the following section of this report.

Table 3: Allocable Cost Summary
Allocable Cost Summary-Central Services Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Unallowable
Total Cost Cost _ Allowable Cost
Summary $ 9,357,883 $ 1,177,992 $ 8,179,891 Central Service
101: ACCOUNTING SERVICES 1,995,562 - 1,995,562
101: CITY ADMINISTRATION 1,406,378 101,030 1,305,348 101: CITY ATTORNEY 555,350 232,692 322,658 101: CITY CLERK 595,935 - 595,935
101: CITY COUNCIL 314,470 314,470 -
101: CITY TREASURER 20,170 - 20,170
101: HUMAN RESOURCES 854,662 - 854,662
101: NON-DEPARTMENTAL 3,560,600 529,800 3,030,800 101: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINI 1,845,696 - 1,845,696
101: PW - BUILDING 234,250 - 234,250
101: Vacancy Credit (2,025,190) - (2,025,190) WWI 9 Cost Allocation Plan

Central Service Allocation Methodology
The first step of the iterative allocation method is to distribute the allocable costs of the central service departments to other central service departments and operating departments based on the distribution methodology and bases that best represent the activity of the central service, and the functions it serves.

The sections below describe each central service and the methodology used to allocate their costs.

Corresponding tables detailing each distribution are attached in the Appendices as tables A-1 through A-3 for the OMB compliant plan and B-1 for the full cost plan.

Section 1: Accounting Services
The Finance Division provides a comprehensive financial accounting and reporting system that meets the information requirements of its users, and complies with all applicable laws and regulations, including Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). In advising City officials on the City's financial position and condition,the Division provides timely financial information necessary for decision-making, and assists City staff in implementing and developing appropriate internal controls and financial systems. The Division safeguards all City assets and promotes their efficient use while adhering to prescribed City Council and management policies. It provides the framework for the processing of all financial management services that include general ledger accounting, budget preparation and analysis, purchasing, payroll, accounts payable and receivable, cash receipting, utility billing, and animal licensing. Under the direction of the Assistant City Manager, the Division organizes, reviews, and prepares the annual budget document for the City. It also produces federal, state and other reports as required by law in conformance with municipal accounting regulations and standards.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of Accounting Services, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
■ One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund
101: ACCOUNTING SERVICES
Modified Total Direct Cost 100%
Section 2: City Administration
The Administrative Services Department is comprised of the City Clerk, Finance, Human Resources, Information Technology, and Risk Management divisions. To manage the fiscal and financial affairs of the City, and to support City officials and all departmental operations through a variety of financial services and risk management;to administer top quality personnel services with the highest level of professionalism and integrity in order to attract, retain, train and develop a competent workforce; to provide accessible, proactive leadership for the community through the establishment of policies encouraging a high standard of governance; and to develop opportunities for the use of technology to improve and enhance services to the community
WWI 10 Cost Allocation Plan

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of City Administration, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total number of Council agendas for each department and fund
101: CITY ADMINISTRATION
Total FTE's 33%
Total Agendas 33%
Modified Total Direct Cost 33%
Section 3: City Attorney
The City Attorney is appointed by the City Council and is charged with advising and giving legal opinions to Council, Boards, Commissions, and City Staff. The City Attorney apprises all City officials of changes in statutes or case law as they affect the City. The City Attorney also ensures that violations of City laws are prosecuted where necessary. The City Attorney furnishes services at all meetings of the Council, and prepares ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and other legal documents. Certain other attorneys may represent the City in matters of special expertise such as worker's compensation and public liability defense.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Attorney, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total number of Council agendas for each department and fund
101: CITY ATTORNEY
Total FTE's 33%
Total Agendas 33%
Modified Total Direct Cost 33%
WWI 11 Cost Allocation Plan

Section 4: City Clerk
This position fulfills the statutory requirements of City Clerk. The City Clerk's Office prepares Council meeting agendas, and minutes, assists other departments with submission of staff reports and support documentation, advertises legal notices relating to Council agendas and other City issues, maintains advisory commissions' records and the City seal, and attests all City documents. As filing officer, the City Clerk oversees the filing requirements of the Fair Political Practices Commission, manages the City Conflict of Interest Code, and maintains the Upland Municipal Code and Zoning Code.The City Clerk's Office serves as the information center for City Hall and is responsible for all official City records such as ordinances, resolutions, deeds, agreements, and formal bid contracts. The office also coordinates the records management program for all City departments. All City elections are the responsibility of the City Clerk.

Citywide municipal elections are conducted in November of even-numbered years. Elections require compliance with State mandated deadlines, legal notices, and the cooperation of several outside agencies, which are all coordinated by the City Clerk.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Clerk, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total number of Council agendas for each department and fund
101: CITY CLERK
Total FTE's 33%
Total Agendas 33%
Modified Total Direct Cost 33%
Section 5: City Council
The City Council is the governing body of the City of Upland and has the power to make all laws and regulations with respect to municipal affairs subject only to the limitations of the State and Federal Constitutions. The City Council is an elected five-person governing body. The Mayor is elected independently with the same voting power as other members of the Council. City Councilmembers each serve four-year terms with elections every other year;therefore,three Councilmembers are elected at one election and the Mayor and one Councilmember at the other. The City Council appoints the City Manager and City Attorney, all of whom serve at the City Council's discretion.The City Council establishes policies of the City,which are implemented by staff under the direction of the City Manager.The City Council approves all ordinances, resolutions, and contracts in excess of limits set by policy.

WWI 12 Cost Allocation Plan

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of City Council, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund
• A Third (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total number of Council agendas for each department and fund
• For the OMB plan the costs of City Council are not allocated to ensure OMB compliance 101: CITY COUNCIL
Total FTE's 33%
Total Agendas 33%
Modified Total Direct Cost 33%
Section 6: City Treasurer
The residents of Upland elect the City Treasurer. It is the Treasurer's responsibility to oversee the investment of City funds in a safe and secure manner while ensuring maximum return on all investments within limitations set by State law. The City Treasurer operates under the restrictions of Section 53646 of the Government Code of the State of California and Resolution 6133 of the Upland City Council—a resolution that affirms the Investment Policy for Public Funds. The City follows the practice of pooling cash and investments for all funds except for funds required to be held by outside fiscal agents. Investment income is allocated quarterly to various funds based on the average monthly cash balances Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Treasurer, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total revenues for each department and fund
101: CITY TREASURER
Total Revenues 100%
Section 7: Human Resources
The Human Resources Department provides consultation, guidance and support while working collaboratively to implement innovative solutions supporting an optimally performing organization.

Responsibilities of this Department include: consultation on organizational development activities, facilitation of workforce planning, providing staffing solutions, learning and development, classification and compensation, leadership/advice on employee and labor relations issues, management, employee and WWI 13 Cost Allocation Plan

e•;6
rrnAp=�
candidate coaching, administration of legal provisions, policy and labor contract interpretation, ensuring compliance with legal policies and best practices, benefits administration, communication internally and externally regarding human resources activities, planning on strategic initiatives, safety and rideshare programs. This Department also administers the self-funded insurance programs that include workers' compensation, unemployment and general liability.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the Human Resources Department,it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below. • Fifty percent(50%)of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund
• Fifty percent (50%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total salaries and benefits for each department and fund
101: HUMAN RESOURCES
Total FTE's 50%
Total Salaries and Benefits 50%
Section 8: Non-Departmental
The purpose of the Non-Departmental categorization is to accumulate those costs not easily associated with a particular cost center and to more easily monitor certain expendable costs for savings and control purposes.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of costs of Non-Departmental, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• One percent (1%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department in the general fund
• Twenty-two percent (22%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total salaries and benefits for each department in the general fund
• Twenty-eight percent (28%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total Solar and Energy Conversation Value for each department and fund
• Forty-nine percent(49%)of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total salaries and benefits for each department and fund
WWI 14 Cost Allocation Plan

•
101: NON-DEPARTMENTAL
Modified Total Direct Cost-General Fund 1%
Salaries & Benefits -General Fund 22%
Total Salaries and Benefits 49%
Solar& Energy Conservation Value 28%
Section 9: Public Works Administration
Public Works is committed to ensuring that the necessary public resources are available to meet the City's General Plan growth objectives and to preserve the City's public facilities for the community's benefit. Public Works is responsible for the maintenance and replacement of City streets, alleys and right-of-way; parks and open space; City tree care; public buildings; transportation systems (traffic signal, signage, street lighting); storm drainage systems; National Pollution Discharge Elimination (NPDES) program compliance; water and recycled water operations and services; sewer operations and services & environmental compliance; and the management of solid waste collection, street sweeping and disposal services.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of Public Works Administration, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
■ One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the salary and benefits for each department and fund that Public Works Administration supports 101: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
S&B of PW Admin supported groups 100%
Section 10: Public Works - Building
Public Building Facility Maintenance Operations is responsible for the maintenance and repair of 14 public buildings (Civic Center Complex, Senior Center, Police Department, Public Works, etc.), 12 park restrooms and 5 miscellaneous City facilities. Maintenance and repair of these facilities preserves the asset service life, and provides a safe,suitable environment for City personnel and the public to use for business, educational, or recreational activities.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of Public Works - Building, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of Building full-time equivalents for each department and fund that Public Works- Building supports 1►►1 WILLDAN 15 Cost Allocation Plan

e•;6
rrnAp=�
101: PW - BUILDING
,Building FTE 100%
Section 11: Vacancy Credit
Upland is unable to keep every budgeted position filled the entire fiscal year. The vacancy credit is an estimate for the amount of budgeted expenses that will not be spent on salaries and benefits due to vacant positions. By including the vacancy credit in the budget, Upland frees up funds allocated to salaries and benefits to be spent towards other essential services.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the costs of Vacancy Credit, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
• One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total vacancy salary and benefits for each department and fund
101: Vacancy Credit
Total Vacancy S&B 100%
WWI 16 Cost Allocation Plan

Iterative Allocation
The total allocable expenditures of each central service department were allocated to other departments (including both operating departments and other central service departments) based on the individual methodologies outlined above in Sections 1 through 11 of the Allocation Percentages chapter. Any cost allocated from central service to central service is then reallocated out using the same methodology. This operation is done iteratively until all allocable cost is received by the operating departments and funds,and none remain with the central services.After completion of the iterative allocation method,a total combined allocable cost of$8,179,891 was distributed to all departments and funds until the allocable cost remained only in the operating departments and funds,and the amount of allocable costs remaining in central service departments was equal to zero.

The full cost plan follows the same methodology with the exception that all costs that were excluded solely for OMB compliance, but were reasonable for the full plan, were made allowable and included in the allocation. See Table B-1 for additional details for the full cost plan.

After implementing the iterative allocation methodology, all allocable central service costs have been distributed to the operating departments and funds. Table 1 in the Executive Summary of this report summarized the distribution of the total allocable cost of$8,179,891 to each recipient department for the OMB compliant CAP.Table 2 summarized the distribution of the total allocable cost of$10,620,581 to each recipient department for the full cost CAP.

WWI 17 Cost Allocation Plan

Appendix A
Appendix A lists the tables detailing the allocation methodology performed in allocating central service costs for the OMB compliant cost allocation plan.

WWI 18 Cost Allocation Plan

h'
Table A-1: Initial Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) First Iteration Central Service Departments
101: 101: 101:PUBLIC 101:
101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:NON- 101:PW- Central Service/Operating Departments ACCOUNTING HUMAN WORKS Vacancy SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEY CLERK COUNCIL TREASURER RESOURCES DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Credit 101:ACCOUNTING SERVICES 1.5% 5.8% 5.8% 5.8% 5.8% 0.1% 2.4% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 101:CITY ADMINISTRATION 1.0% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 0.0% 0.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 101:CITY ATTORNEY 0.4% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:CITY CLERK 0.4% 6.1% 6.1% 6.1% 6.1% 0.0% 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 101:ANIMAL SERVICES 0.6% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% _0.5% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:COMMUNITY SERVICES 2.8% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 0.7% 3.2% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 101:DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3.5% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 4.5% 5.7% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 101:FIRE 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:LIBRARY 1.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:MAIL/PRINTING SERVICES 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:POLICE 25.2% 25.2% 25.2% 25.2% 25.2% 1.4% 47.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% 76.7% 101:PUBLIC WORKS 5.9% 12.7% 12.7% 12.7% 12.7% 0.8% 4.8% 4.7% 12.8% 33.5% 12.5% 201:HOUSING FUND 2.7% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 5.5% _2.3% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 203:PUB SAFETY AUGMENTATION 1.0% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.5% _3.2% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 204:GAS TAX 0.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 2.4% 0.8% 0.4% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 205:MEASURE I 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 2.3%_ _0.6% 0.3% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 206:ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCOUNT 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 2.2% 0.3% 0.2% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 208:HOME 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 209:CDBG 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% _0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 210:PBIA 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% _0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 211:AIR QUALITY POLLUTION REDUCT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 217:OTHER GRANTS 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 218:OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% _0.1% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 219:OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% _0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 220:ASSET FORFEITURE-FED DOJ 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% _0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 222:CALHOME 0.8% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.5% _0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 229:AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 425:GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 2.4% _0.5% 0.3% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 426:STREET&ALLEY REPAIRS-BURRTEC 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% _0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 640:WATER UTILITY 21.3% 12.9% 12.9% 12.9% 12.9% 33.4% 15.8% 7.6% 48.0% 42.6% 0.0% 641:SOLID WASTE UTILITY 14.8% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 20.4% 2.3% 1.3% 9.0% 3.7% 0.0% 645:SEWER UTILITY 10.4% 6.3% 6.3% 6.3% 6.3% 13.1% 7.3% 3.0% 20.8% 20.3% 0.0% 805:SUCCESSOR AGENCY 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11y WILLDAN 19 Cost Allocation Plan

h'
Table A-2: Final Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) Central Service Departments
101: 101:PUBLIC
Central Service/Operating Departments ACCOUNTING 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:HUMAN 101:NON- WORKS 101:PW- 101:Vacancy SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEY CLERK COUNCIL TREASURER RESOURCES DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Credit 101:ACCOUNTING SERVICES 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:CITY ADMINISTRATION 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:CITY ATTORNEY 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:CITY CLERK 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:CITY COUNCIL 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:CITY TREASURER 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:HUMAN RESOURCES 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:NON-DEPARTMENTAL 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:PW-BUILDING 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:Vacancy Credit 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:ANIMAL SERVICES 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.5% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:COMMUNITY SERVICES 3.1% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 0.7% 3.4% 8.6% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 101:DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3.8% 9.2% 9.2% 9.2% 9.2% 4.5% 6.0% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 101:FIRE 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:LIBRARY 1.7% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.1% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 101:MAIL/PRINTING SERVICES 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 101:POLICE 26.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 31.4% 1.4% 47.4% 53.1% 0.0% 0.0% 78.1% 101:PUBLIC WORKS 6.5% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 0.9% 5.1% 5.5% 12.8% 33.5% 13.1% 201:HOUSING FUND 2.8% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 5.5% 2.4% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 203:PUB SAFETY AUGMENTATION 1.2% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.5% 3.3% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 204:GAS TAX 0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 2.4% 0.8% 0.5% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 205:MEASURE I 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 2.3% 0.7% 0.4% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 206:ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCOUNT 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 2.2% 0.3% 0.2% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 208:HOME 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 209:CDBG 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 210:PBIA 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% _0.0% 211:AIR QUALITY POLLUTION REDUCT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 217:OTHER GRANTS 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 3.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 218:OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 219:OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 220:ASSET FORFEITURE-FED DOJ 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 222:CALHOME 0.9% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 229:AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 425:GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 2.4% 0.6% 0.3% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 426:STREET&ALLEY REPAIRS-BURRTEC 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 640:WATER UTILITY 23.0% 17.0% 17.0% 17.0% 17.0% 33.6% 17.2% 9.7% 48.0% 42.6% 0.8% 641:SOLID WASTE UTILITY 15.4% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 20.5% 2.9% 2.2% 9.0% 3.7% 0.4% 645:SEWER UTILITY 11.2% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 13.2% 8.0% 4.0% 20.8% 20.3% 0.4% 805:SUCCESSOR AGENCY 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11y WILLDAN 20 Cost Allocation Plan

Table A-3: Final Allocation Amounts (OMB Compliant CAP) r Central Service Departments
101: 101:PUBLIC
Department ACCOUNTING 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:HUMAN 101:NON- WORKS 101:PW- 101:Vacancy Total SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEY CLERK COUNCIL TREASURER RESOURCES DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Credit Allocation 1,995,562 1,305,348 322,658 595,935 0 20,170 854,662 3,030,800 1,845,696 234,250 -2,025,190 8,179,891 101:ANIMAL SERVICES 13,256 3,917 968 1,788 - 25 4,295 24,537 - - (328) 48,459 101:COMMUNITY SERVICES 61,130 43,535 10,761 19,875 - 139 29,282 261,472 - - (64,309) 361,887 101:DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 76,148 120,458 29,775 54,993 - 900 51,470 173,206 - - (74,945) 432,006 101:FIRE 1,181 336 83 153 - 0 27 4,248 - - (29) 5,998 101:LIBRARY 33,334 13,566 3,353 6,193 - 7 825 124,446 - - (1,025) 180,700 101:MAIUPRINTING SERVICES 1,155 328 81 150 - 0 17 132 - - (28) 1,835 101:POLICE 527,633 409,746 101,282 187,063 - 280 405,278 1,609,179 - - (1,580,963) 1,659,498 101:PUBLIC WORKS 129,424 195,286 48,271 89,154 - 181 43,418 165,420 235,428 78,388 (265,492) 719,478 201:HOUSING FUND 55,818 27,804 6,873 12,694 - 1,111 20,759 60,197 - - (1,989) 183,266 203:PUB SAFETY AUGMENTATION 23,001 21,975 5,432 10,032 - 302 28,216 56,548 - - (1,385) 144,122 204:GAS TAX 15,587 8,375 2,070 3,823 - 483 7,187 15,059 51,814 - (588) 103,810 205:MEASURE I 6,404 4,982 1,231 2,274 - 471 5,696 11,694 41,875 - (324) 74,304 206:ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCOUNT 2,872 2,218 548 1,013 - 438 2,645 5,642 20,291 - (145) 35,523 208:HOME 10,867 3,088 763 1,410 - 8 158 838 - - (262) 16,869 209:CDBG 8,733 3,355 829 1,532 - 135 1,697 3,749 - - (258) 19,773 210:PBIA 1,087 309 76 141 - 13 16 85 - - (26) 1,701 211:AIR QUALITY POLLUTION REDUCT 528 246 61 113 - 30 147 258 - - (18) 1,364 217:OTHER GRANTS 4,745 1,858 459 848 - 743 804 1,513 - - (142) 10,829 218:OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 2,316 700 173 320 - 55 753 2,765 10,046 - (58) 17,070 219:OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS 312 89 22 41 - 10 5 25 - - (8) 496 220:ASSET FORFEITURE-FED DOJ 4,704 3,256 805 1,486 - 0 3,298 6,311 - - (217) 19,644 222:CALHOME 17,315 4,925 1,217 2,248 - 106 256 1,341 - - (418) 26,990 229:AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 2,683 1,750 433 799 - 1 1,899 4,117 14,718 - (118) 26,282 425:GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 4,340 3,999 988 1,826 - 485 4,881 9,822 35,405 - (253) 61,492 426:STREET&ALLEY REPAIRS-BURRTEC 1,499 1,204 298 550 - 80 1,511 3,185 - - (78) 8,250 640:WATER UTILITY 458,442 221,851 54,837 101,282 - 6,787 146,674 294,416 885,383 99,684 (15,989) 2,253,367 641:SOLID WASTE UTILITY 306,848 97,983 24,220 44,733 - 4,131 25,172 67,988 166,170 8,623 (7,990) 737,878 645:SEWER UTILITY 223,917 107,946 26,682 49,281 - 2,659 68,002 122,139 384,565 47,555 (7,788) 1,024,958 805:SUCCESSOR AGENCY 282 260 64 119 - 591 273 468 - - (16) 2,041 ' WILLDAN 21 Cost Allocation Plan

Appendix B
Appendix B provides the table detailing the allocation performed in allocating central service costs for the full cost allocation plan. The methodology for the full plan is the same as for the OMB compliant plan, as it is the most reasonable and represents how indirect support is provided in the City. The difference between the two plans, as has been described in this report, is in the costs that can be allocated.

WWI 22 Cost Allocation Plan

Table B-1: Final Allocation Amounts (Full CAP)
Central Service Departments
101: 101:PUBLIC
101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:CITY 101:HUMAN 101:NON- 101:PW- 101:Vacancy Total Department ACCOUNTING ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEY CLERK COUNCIL TREASURER RESOURCES DEPARTMENTAL WORKS BUILDING Credit Allocation SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
1,995,562 1,406,378 322,658 595,935 314,470 20,170 854,662 3,030,800 1,845,696 234,250 0 10,620,581 101:ANIMAL SERVICES 13,256 4,221 968 1,788 944 25 4,295 24,537 - - - 50,034 101:COMMUNITY SERVICES 61,130 46,905 10,761 19,875 10,488 139 29,282 261,472 - - - 440,053 101:DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 76,148 129,781 29,775 54,993 29,019 900 51,470 173,206 - - - 545,294 101:FIRE 1,181 362 83 153 81 0 27 4,248 - - - 6,134 101:LIBRARY 33,334 14,616 3,353 6,193 3,268 7 825 124,446 - - - 186,043 101:MAIL/PRINTING SERVICES 1,155 354 81 150 79 0 17 132 - - - 1,967 101:POLICE 527,633 441,459 101,282 187,063 98,711 280 405,278 1,609,179 - - - 3,370,886 101:PUBLIC WORKS 129,424 210,400 48,271 89,154 47,046 181 43,418 165,420 235,428 78,388 - 1,047,131 201:HOUSING FUND 55,818 29,956 6,873 12,694 6,698 1,111 20,759 60,197 - - - 194,106 203:PUB SAFETY AUGMENTATION 23,001 23,676 5,432 10,032 5,294 302 28,216 56,548 - - - 152,501 204:GAS TAX 15,587 9,023 2,070 3,823_ 2,018 483 7,187 15,059 51,814 - - 107,064 205:MEASURE I 6,404 5,368 1,231 2,274 1,200 471 5,696 11,694 41,875 - - 76,214 206:ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCOUNT 2,872 2,390 548 1,013 534 438 2,645 5,642 20,291 - - 36,374 208:HOME 10,867 3,327 763 1,410 744 8 158 838 - - - 18,114 209:CDBG 8,733 3,615 829 1,532 808 135 1,697 3,749 - - - 21,099 210:PBIA 1,087 333 76 141 75 13 16 85 - - - 1,825 211:AIR QUALITY POLLUTION REDUCT 528 266 61 113 59 30 147 258 - - - 1,461 217:OTHER GRANTS 4,745 2,002 459 848 448 743 804 1,513 - - - 11,563 218:OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 2,316 754 173 320 169 55 753 2,765 10,046 - - 17,351 219:OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY GRANTS 312 96 22 41 21 10 5 25 - - - 532 220:ASSET FORFEITURE-FED DOJ 4,704 3,508 805 1,486 784 0 3,298 6,311 - - - 20,897 222:CALHOME 17,315 5,306 1,217 2,248 1,186 106 256 1,341 - - - 28,976 229:AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 2,683 1,886 433 799 422 1 1,899 4,117 14,718 - - 26,957 425:GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS 4,340 4,308 988 1,826 963 485 4,881 9,822 35,405 - - 63,018 426:STREET&ALLEY REPAIRS-BURRTEC 1,499 1,298 298 550 290 80 1,511 3,185 - - - 8,711 640:WATER UTILITY 458,442 239,021 54,837 101,282 53,446 6,787 146,674 294,416 885,383 99,684 - 2,339,973 641:SOLID WASTE UTILITY 306,848 105,567 24,220 44,733 23,605 4,131 25,172 67,988 166,170 8,623 - 777,057 645:SEWER UTILITY 223,917 116,301 26,682 49,281 26,005 2,659 68,002 122,139 384,565 47,555 - 1,067,106 805:SUCCESSOR AGENCY 282 281 64 119 63 591 273 468 - - - 2,141 11y WILLDAN 23 Cost Allocation Plan

.CA.. ,4 . T.
....,... 1,,,...„ ,
I
5 a
}
'.y.. r S. {r .240.040,
am'^"
-40
. .:,- ._._:-,-, it i lit 1, .
ii
4, •
- k.O I
4fW I LLDAN
. FINANCIAL SERVICES
27368 Via Industria,Suite 200
Temecula,California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 I Fax:888.326.6864
951.587.3500 I Fax:951.587.3510
www.willdan.com

4 of riz.z
d CITY OF UPLAND
c ' BUDGET AMENDMENT
-LIFORv•
Date: 6/8/2026 Fiscal Year: FY25-26
Requested by: Charles Kwon Amount: $ -
Dept/Div: Finance Description: 6/8/2026 Council Meeting CAP Updated Solid Waste Allocation

EXPENDITURES
Proposed
Account Number Dept/Account Description Adopted Budget Current Budget Amendment Amended Budget 6416301-5253 Solid Waste/Contract Svcs - - 225,000.00 225,000.00 1015410-5253 Pkway Row/Contract Svcs 277,200.00 418,700.00 (225,000.00) 193,700.00 6406201-5292 Water/Admin Svc Expense 1,771,510.00 1,771,510.00 568,464.00 2,339,974.00 6416301-5292 Solid Waste/Admin Svc Exper 402,370.00 402,370.00 374,694.00 777,064.00 6456403-5292 Sewer/Admin Svc Expense 643,140.00 643,140.00 423,973.00 1,067,113.00 Total 3,094,220.00 3,235,720.00 1,367,131.00 4,602,851.00

REVENUES
Proposed
Account Number Account Description Adopted Budget Current Budget Amendment Amended Budget 1010000-4910 Water/Admin Svc Fee (1,771,510.00) (1,771,510.00) (568,464.00) (2,339,974.00) 1010000-4911 Solid Waste/Admin Svc Fee (402,370.00) (402,370.00) (374,694.00) (777,064.00) 1010000-4912 Sewer/Admin Svc Fee (643,140.00) (643,140.00) (423,973.00) (1,067,113.00) Total (2,817,020.00) (2,817,020.00) (1,367,131.00) (4,184,151.00) Fiscal Impact -
REASON/JUSTIFICATION (Please be specific)
❑ Reallocation of maintenance&operations to cover actual expense/encumbrances ❑ Estimated revenue adjustment for donations/other sources of revenue ❑ Appropriation line item adjustment to match funds received by grant, donations of other sources (deposit) ❑ Emergency purpose:

Description of Expense:

El Other- Explain:

FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 COST ALLOCATION PLAN, UPDATED SOLID WASTE COST ALLOCATION AND UPDATED ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY FOR

SELF-FUNDED LIABILITY
This request is directly related to:
❑ Purchase Requisition No. Vendor:

El Council Meeting action: 6/8/2026 (Attach copy of minutes) Increase Purchase Order# OR Requisition #

APPROVALS
Dept Head Approval: Date:

Finance Officer: Date:

Funds Available? ❑Yes ❑No
o Approved ❑ Denied
City Manager*: Date:
*Not required if approved by City Council
Comment:

Finance Division Only:

BA#: 12266069 Help Ticket#: N/A
Journal #: Initial/Date:

Revised:3/2024 Page 102/244036 AM

4c, °v °p`q� CITFUP LAND
�" - -
.�, �` "The City of Gracious Living"
c�lrFOR�i�
DATE: June 8,2026
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:ROBERT D.DALQUEST,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

ALAN FRENCH,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER

YESENIA DIAZ,ASSISTANT ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A CASH IN LIEU AGREEMENT FOR UNDERGROUNDING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 20819
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving a cash in lieu agreement for undergrounding and public improvements as provided in Conditions 30.7 through 30.13 and 30.21 of Tentative Parcel Map No.20819 and Development Plan Review No. 24-05 concerning the creation of two out-parcels in the Mountain Green Commercial Center located at 233 S. Mountain Avenue; and authorize the City Manager to execute the cash-in lieu agreement.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to facilitate development in an orderly, cost-effective, and appropriate manner for the benefit of the community.

BACKGROUND
On July 23,2025,the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 5033 approving Tentative Parcel Map No.20819 and Development Plan Review No. 24-0005, to subdivide an existing 6.8-acre parcel in the northern portion of the Mountain Green Commercial Center. This approval creates two additional out-parcels for a drive-through restaurant and future commercial use, including buildings, landscaping, new parking spaces, and related site improvements consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations of the commercial center located at 233 S.Mountain Avenue.

As part of the Applicant's conditions of approval for the tentative parcel map,they are required to underground utility distribution lines in the public right-of way on the frontage of the new parcels along 8th Street per Condition No 30- 21,and in accordance with the Upland Municipal Code(UMC)Section 12.28.020 or pay a cash in lieu fee.In addition, the tentative parcel map is conditioned to rehabilitate the asphalt pavement on Sinclair Avenue,8th Street and Mountain Avenue along the frontage of the new parcels per Conditions No 30-7 through 30-13 or pay a cash in lieu fee.

The Final Parcel Map 20819 is also on today's agenda for the City Council's approval for recordation and to have the City Manager sign the subdivision agreement.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The Applicant (DMP Properties) is seeking approval from the City Council to accept a cash-in-lieu fee for the undergrounding and pavement rehabilitation improvements rather than making improvements themselves. The Mountain Green Center ownership submitted the request to pay a cash in-lieu fee because they do not have experience in contracting for public improvements as they are strictly a commercial real estate portfolio company. Section 66462 of the State Subdivision Map Act allows a city to enter an agreement and collect a cash in lieu fee for the required public improvements for a subdivision map, provided the required off-site improvements are in the conditions of approval for the subdivision map,and an agreement is approved by the City Council along with the Final Map.

The Developer's engineer provided the estimated total cost to underground the utility lines to be $74,222 (approximately $450 per lineal foot) and a re-pavement cost of$257,167 (approximately $40 per square foot) for Sinclair Avenue, 8th Street and Mountain Avenue along the frontage of the new parcels. Staff have reviewed the estimates provided and found them to be reasonable and comparable to other estimates for similar undergrounding and pavement projects within the City. An additional 20%was included in the total amount of the cash in lieu fee, which is an industry standard for surety to cover construction unknowns,inflation and escalation of construction costs.

The payment of the cash-in-lieu fee will satisfy the conditions, expedite the project, and ensure future commitments are realized. In review of the existing poles, the undergrounding may cause replacement or additional poles to be installed which would not meet the intent of the underground ordinance.Also,the pavement conditions on 81h Street, Sinclair Avenue and Mountain Avenue are in need of repair but will result in patch work at those locations making a cash payment more desirable at this time,as there is no capital project in the near future to repave these streets.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA.The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The undergrounding of the utility lines cash-in-lieu fee is$74,222 and the pavement rehabilitation cash-in-lieu fee is $257,167.The total of$331,389 will be deposited into Fund 425 Account No.4250000-4235 reserved specifically for the identified work.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Not a Project.

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND APPROVING AN IN-LIEU FEE IN SATISFACTION
OF CONDITIONS 30.7, 30.8 THROUGH 30.13 INCLUSIVE,
and 30.21 OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20819 (TTM-
24-01), AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW-NO. DPR-24-
05 TO CREATE TWO ADDITIONAL PARCELS FOR NEW

DRIVE-THROUGH OR COMMERCIAL USE LOCATED AT
233 S. MOUNTAIN AVE. (APN: 1008-101- 02)
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Upland passed Resolution No. 5033 and 5034 on July 23, 2025, approving Tentative Tract Map 20819 (TTM 24-01) to create two commercial parcels on a 6.8-acre parcel of real property located at 233 S.

Mountain Avenue ("Development"); and
WHEREAS, Condition 30.21 of Resolution No. 5033 and 5034 requires the undergrounding of electrical distribution telephone and TV cable lines, on the project site and frontage shall be underground in accordance with the Upland Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Conditions 30.7 through 30.13 of Resolution No. 5033 and 5034 requires public street improvements on the frontage of the project site in accordance with the Upland Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, DPM 8TH Street, LLC ("Developer") will install the underground conduit and infrastructure necessary to implement the underground requirements within the project site.; and
WHEREAS, Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act allows a city to enter into an agreement to collect a cash security for the conditioned public improvements for the project.; and
WHEREAS, the Developer provided estimates for Southern California Edison (SCE) and Charter/Spectrum using other forces to underground the existing overhead facilities in the public frontage of 8th Street, along the north side of the project site, in an amount of $74,222; and
WHEREAS, the Developer provided estimates for the street improvements in the public frontage of 8th Street, along the north side of the project site, Mountain along the west side and the full width of Sinclair in an amount of $257,147; and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting the City Council accept the alternative of an in-lieu fee, which is the cost of undergrounding effort to cover the approximately 197 linear feet of the south side of 8TH Street as well as the street improvements for the project on Mountain, 8th Street and Sinclare. This cost for undergrounding and street improvements will satisfy the undergrounding and improvement development conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Developer's proposed in-lieu fee of three hundred thirty-one thousand three hundred sixty-nine dollars ($331,369.00) is reasonable,

Resolution No.

considering the cost of the items and
WHEREAS, the funds will be used to support undergrounding efforts that will provide a benefit to the community.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. Conditions 30.21 of Tentative Tract Map No. 20819 (TTM 24- 01) regarding the underground of public utilities on 8th Street frontage may be satisfied in the alternative with the payment of an in-lieu fee of seventy-four thousand two hundred and twenty-two dollars ($74,222.00) to be used to support undergrounding projects in the City.

SECTION 3. Conditions 30.7 through 30.13 of Tentative Tract Map No. 20819 (TTM 24- 01) regarding the public improvements on 8th Street, Sinclair Avenue and Mountain Avenue frontage may be satisfied in the alternative with the payment of an in-lieu fee of two hundred fifty-seven thousand one hundred and forty-seven dollars ($257,147.00)to be used to support improvement projects in the City.

SECTION 4. CEQA. This Project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines (In- Fill Development Projects).

SECTION 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June 2026.

Bill Velto, Mayor

Resolution No.

I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 8th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

AGREEMENT FOR CASH IN LIEU OF CONSTRUCTION OF

OFF-SITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
General Terms:

Developer Name: DMP 8th Street, LLC Date:

Developer's Address: 250 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300, Newport Beach CA 92660 Project Number:

Tract: N/A Parcel Map: No. 20819 ( PM 20819)
Plot Plan: N/A Public Use: N/A
Conditional Use: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A
*Type of Improvement(s):

1. Raised Median and Median Landscaping including N/A
X 2. Road Improvements including paving.

X 3. Other Improvements undergrounding overhead.
* Please check applicable improvements cash is for and list major items.

Names of street(s)subject to the cash payment in lieu of Improvements identified below: Mountain Avenue, 8th Street, and Sinclair Avenue
Limits of above-indicated street(s): As identified in Resolution No. 5034 for PM No. 20819) and Resolution No. 5033 for PM 20819
This Agreement for Payment of Cash in Lieu of Construction of Off-Site Public Improvements ("Agreement") is made as of the above-referenced date, by and between the City of Upland, a California municipal corporation ("City")and DMP 8th Street, LLC a California limited liability company("Developer").

Recitals
WHEREAS, Developer is the owner or authorized developer of certain real property generally located at 233 South Mountain Avenue, Upland CA 91786, APN No. 1008-1010-20000 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Developer has applied for and/or obtained approval of entitlements pursuant to PM 20819 for the development of the Property(Mountain Green Center) (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval for the Project, City has required the construction of the following off-site public improvements (collectively, the"Improvements"): Conditions 30.7, 30.8 through 30.13 inclusive, and 30.21 listed in Resolution No. 5033, and Conditions 30.7, 30.8 through 30.13 inclusive, and

30.21 listed in Resolution No. 5034, each for PM 20819; and WHEREAS, Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act allows for a City to enter into an agreement for the conditioned improvements and collect a cash security in- lieu of construction, for the public improvements.; and

WHEREAS, City has determined that, in lieu of Developer's immediate construction of the Improvements, it is in the public interest for Developer to provide a cash payment to City, to be used by City solely for the design, acquisition, administration, reimbursement, and/or construction of the Improvements, or the portion thereof identified herein; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into pursuant to Resolution No. 5033 and Resolution No. 5034 for PM 20819, and, to the extent applicable, the Mitigation Fee Act and the Subdivision Map Act;.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Payment in Lieu.

1.1 Cash Payment. In lieu of Developer constructing the Improvements, Developer shall pay City the sum of$331,369.00 (the "In Lieu Payment").

1.2 Basis of Amount. For informational purposes only, the amount of the In Lieu Payment was derived by the parties from the bond amounts initially proposed for the Improvements; such amounts were based on Engineers' Cost Estimate Sheet dated March 24, 2026 attached as Exhibit A and include a 20% contingency. The amount of the In-Lieu Payment is not subject to change except pursuant to Section 5.1 below.

1.3 Timing of Payment. A check for the In Lieu Payment shall be delivered by Developer to the City prior to City Council approval of the Parcel Map, and the City shall be entitled to cash such check upon recordation of the Parcel Map (the "Due Date").

2. Use of Funds.

2.1 Restricted Use. City shall deposit the In Lieu Payment into a separate fund designated for the Improvements and shall expend the In-Lieu Payment, including any interest earned, for the purposes of constructing the Improvements.

2.2 Eligible Uses.The In Lieu Payment may be used for the costs and expenses of constructing the Improvements, including the following :
(a) design and engineering,
(b) environmental review and permitting,
(c) right-of-way or easement acquisition,
(d) construction,
(e) construction management, inspection, and administration, (f) reimbursement of prior eligible City advances or reimbursements otherwise authorized by law and the applicable ordinance/resolution; and (g) related professional services and financing costs.

2.3 No General Revenue Use. The In Lieu Payment shall not be used for general revenue purposes.

3. Construction.

3.1 Timing. City may construct the Improvements, through a public works contract, through another public agency, or through a reimbursement/participation agreement, at such time as City determines in its sole discretion, subject to applicable law.

3.2 Completion Date. City does not guarantee that the improvements will be commenced or completed by any particular date, except as may be required by applicable law governing the collected funds.

3.3 No Private Right to Construct. By making the In Lieu Payment, Developer shall have no right to construct the off-site Improvements unless City separately authorizes such work in writing. If Developer constructs the Improvements (or portion thereof), the City shall release the In-Lieu Payment, with accrued interest, to Developer upon demand by Developer after substantial completion of the Improvements (or portion thereof).

4. Satisfaction of Improvement Condition. Upon City's receipt of the full In Lieu Payment, Developer shall be deemed to have satisfied only the specific Project condition(s)requiring Developer to construct the Improvements identified in this Agreement, and no other condition of approval or legal obligation shall be waived unless expressly stated herein. City hereby agrees that it shall not impose any demands or requirements or take any position with respect to the Project that conflicts with the previous sentence. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Project and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall govern and control.

5. Adjustments.

5.1 CPI/Engineers Estimate Adjustment. If the In-Lieu Payment is paid after the Due Date provided in Section 1.3 above, then the amount of the In-Lieu Payment shall be increased by 0.5% per month.

5.2 Deleted.

5.3 Refund Rights. Any refund rights shall be governed by applicable law.

5.4 Interest. Developer shall have no contractual right to interest on the In Lieu Payment except to the extent required by applicable law or as such interest actually accrues in the account where the In- Lieu Payment is retained.

6. Police Power. Nothing in this Agreement limits City's police power or land use authority, nor constitutes an admission by City that Developer would otherwise have no duty to construct or fund the Improvements pursuant to applicable law.

7. Deleted

8. Default.

8.1 Developer Default. Failure to timely make the In Lieu Payment constitutes a default.

8.2 City Remedies. Upon default, City may:
(a)withhold permits, map recordation, or inspections,
(b) pursue collection, specific performance, or other legal remedies; and (c) recover its costs and reasonable attorney's fees if authorized by law.

9. Attorney's Fees. In any action to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs, to the fullest extent permitted by California law.

10. Notices.

All notices shall be in writing and delivered to:

City:

City of Upland

Attn: Robert Dalquest, Development Services Director
460 N. Euclid Avenue
Upland CA 91786
[email protected]
Developer:

DMP 8th Street, LLC
Attn: Mark Perlmuter
250 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300, Newport Beach CA 92660 [email protected]
with a copy to:

SHK Law Firm
1 Marseille
Irvine CA 92606
Attn: Stephanie Knutson, Esq.

11. Assignment. Developer may not assign this Agreement without City's prior written consent, which may be withheld in City's reasonable discretion; provided, however, City shall allow assignment to a successor owner of the Property upon assumption in writing and prompt notice thereof to the City.

12. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded against the Property and shall bind successors in interest until satisfied or released by City. Upon request by Developer, the City shall execute a recordable Compliance Certificate memorializing the payment of the In-Lieu Payment in satisfaction of Developer's obligations thereof.

13. Entire Agreement,Amendments.This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement as to the subject matter hereof. Any amendments must be in a writing signed by both parties and approved in a manner required by the City.

14. Governing Law, Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by California law. Venue shall lie exclusively in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, California.

15. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which is deemed an original.

Developer Signature: City Signature:

Name: Mark Perlmutter Name: Michael Blay Title: Manager Title: City Manager
Receipt Number: Dated:

Receipt Description:

Cc: Finance
File

EXHIBIT A

ENGINEERS ESTIMATE

CITY OF UPLAND
ov
-44 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
' ENGINEERING DIVISION

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET
Public Improvements

BOND AMOUNT CALCULATION
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopernent
Location; Sinclair Ave
Item Description Estimated Cost
1 . Street Improvements $ 65,536.00
2 . Sewer Improvements $ -
3 . Water Improvements $ -
4 . Drainage Improvements $ -
5 . Traffic Improvements $ 160.00
6 . Miscellaneous $ -
Sub-total $ 65,696,00
20%Contingency $ 13,139.20
Total Bond Amount $ 78,835,20
Faithful Performance(100%) $ 79,000.00
Labor and Materials (50%) $ 40,000.00
Final Monuments $ -
(Cash Deposit required for monuments)
rigFFS,_1:,
, . A /J6
Nr.vti
e.3 (4, I• 1;11)
C 95O4
Estimated By: Brian Anderson E�4P. 9,00/�,827 RCE#: 68504 ,►'y - -
Date: 3/5/2026
Place RCE stamp and signature
Bond amounts will be calculated by the developer's engineer and checked by the Public Works Department.

Inspection fee deposits shall be paid prior to issuance of permit. 1 Page 113 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Public Street Improvements
Developer DMP Sth Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelapernent
Location: Sinclair Avenue
Street Items quantity Unit Price Amount
Roadway Excavation
1, Projects with Grading Plan area X 0.50' CY $ 25.00 $ - 2, Projects without Grading Plan road area and $ (a)Excavate&Fill CY(c or f) $ 8.00 $
(b)Excavate&Export CY(c-f) S 3.00 $
PCC Curb and Gutter 6" LF 5 S5.00 $ -
PCC Curb and Gutter 8" LF 5 90.00 $
Rock Curb and Gutter(6-sack mix for curb) LF $ 200.00 $ - PCC Sidewalk SF S 12.50 $
PCC Cross Gutter/Spandrel SF 5 26.00 $ -
PCC Curb Only 6" LF $ 53.00 $
PCC Curb Only S" LF $ 55.00 $ -
Rolled Curb LF $ 70.00 $
PCC Pavement SF $ 16.00 $ -
Ribbon/Alley Gutter LF $ 16.00 $
Wheelchair Ramp(ADA Compliant) EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Drive or Alley Approach SF 5 21.00 $
Asphalt Concrete(144 Ibs/ft5) TON $ 102.00 $ - AC Patch-Trench (Match Existing) SF 5 11,00 $
Grind&AC Overlay @ 0.50 inch 16350 SF $ 4.00 $ 65,400,00 Aggregate Base CLII CY $ 85.00 $
AC Berm LF $ 20.00 $ -
Street Lights Underground+Trench l5tandardMaruu.u:; EA $ 12,000,00 $ Street Lights Underground+Trench pucciraivel EA $ 14,000,00 $ - Install Barricades LF $ 110.00 $
Remove Barricades LF $ 10.00 $ -
Remove AC Pavement SF 5 3.00 $
Remove PCC Curb LF $ 20.00 $ -
Adjust Sewer Manhole to grade EA $ 1,500.00 $ Adjust Water Valve to grade EA $ 1,000.00 $ - Sawcut :;P LF 5 2.00 $ 1 i6 00
Decorative Concrete SF $ 35.00 $ -
LJnderwalk Drain EA $ 5,800.00 5
Parkway Trees EA $ 350.00 $ -
Parkway Landscape and Irrigation SF 5 4.50 $
Install Chain Link Fence LE $ 50.00 $ - Irrigation Backflow Prevention Assembly lw/cntlosurc} $ Relocate Power Pole EA S 3o,000,00 $ - Total for Street Improvements $ :;::,:.,3:.::0
By: Brian Anderson
Street Drawing Number(s): SI-25.06A
i Page 114 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Public Sewer Improvements
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location: Sinclair Avenue
Sewer Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
Sewer Manholes (48-inch Diameter) EA $ 16,000.00 $ - Sewer Drop manholes (48-inch Diameter) EA $ 20,000.00 $ - Sewer Cleanouts EA $ 5,500.00 $ - 6-inch VCP Sewer Laterals LF $ 265.00 $ - 8-inch VCP Sewer Mainline LF $ 345.00 $ 10-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 350.00 $
12-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 365.00 $
Concrete Encasement 8-inch LF $ 80.00 $ Concrete Encasement 10-inch LF $ 82.00 $ Concrete Encasement 12-inch LF $ 85.00 $ 8-inch CIP Mainline LF $ 195.00 $
Adjust Cleanout to Grade EA $ 1,000.00 $ Adjust Manhole to Grade EA $ 1,550.00 $ Remove Manhole EA $ 3,500.00 $ - Connect to Existing Manhole and Rechannel EA $ 4,000.00 $ - Backflow Device EA $ 2,500.00 $ - 8-inch x 4-inch Sewer Wye EA $ 600.00 $ - Grease Interceptor(750 gal. min.) EA $ 9,000.00 $ - Remove Existing VCP Sewer Main LF $ 125.00 $ - Total for Sewer Improvements $ -
By
Sewer Drawing Number(s):

Estimate of Cost for
Public Water Improvements
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location; Sinclair Ave
Water Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
6-inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 200.00 6-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 3,800.00 $ - 8-inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 225.00 $ - 8-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 4,500.00 $ 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly EA $ 18,000.00 $ - 12-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 9,000.00 $ - Upgrade 4-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly to 6-inch EA $ 18,000.00 $ - Relocate 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly EA $ 18,000.00 $ - 2-inch Water Service EA $ 6,500.00 $ - 1 1/2-inch Water Service EA $ 3,800.00 $ - 1-inch Water Service EA $ 3,000.00 $ - 2-inch Air Vacuum Release Valve EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Blind Flange EA $ 3,000.00 $ -
Relocate Existing Water meter EA $ 2,000.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service LF $ 200.00 $ - Backflow Device EA $ 3,500.00 $ - 8-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 20,000.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 18,500.00 $ - 4-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve [A $ 16,000.00 $ - 4-inch Modified Blow-Off Assembly EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Blow Off Assembly EA $ 6,500.00 $ - Recycled Water Line, Irrigation LF $ -
12-Inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 265.00 $ - 12-Inch Water Main POC EA $ 4,000.00 $ - Water Meter EA $ 5,000.00 $
Total for Water Improvements $ -
By:

Water Drawing Number(s):

Estimate of Cost for
Public Storm Drain Improvements
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location;
Storm Drain Items Quantity Unit Price Amount 18-inch RCP LF $ 215.00
24-inch RCP LF $ 235.00 $ -
30-inch RCP LF $ 260.00 $ -
36-inch RCP LF $ 285.00 $ -
42-inch RCP LF $ 395.00 $ -
48-inch RCP LF $ 450.00 $ -
54-inch RCP LF $ 530.00 $ -
60-inch RCP LF $ 860.00 $ -
72-inch RCP EA $ 950.00 $ -
8-inch HDPE LF $ 45.00 $
12-inch HDPE LF $ 65.00 $ -
Standard Manhole EA $ 20,000.00 $ -
Junction Structure (with manhole) EA $ 25,000.00 $ - Junction Structure (without manhole) LF $ 18,000.00 $ - 4' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 10,000.00 $ - 7' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 13,500.00 $ - 10' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 16,000.00 $ - 14' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA S 21,000.00 $ - 21' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression [A $ 30,000.00 $ - Concrete Collar EA $ 2,700.00 $ - Clean Out EA $ 3,000.00 $ -
Curb Inlet/Outlet EA $ 3,500.00 $ - Bio-5wale LF $ 20.00 $ -
12"x12" Box Inlet EA $ 1,5Q0.00 $ - 18"x18" or 24"x24" Box Inlet EA $ 2,500.0D $ - Total for Storm Drain Improvements $ -
By:

Storm Drain Drawing Number(s):
1 Page 117 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Traffic Improvements
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location: 233 South Mountain Avenue, Upland, CA
Traffic Improvements Quantity Unit Price Amount 4'" Painted Broken Stripes JF $ 2.00 $ - 4" Painted Double Solid Stripes $ 8.00 $
6" Painted Bike Lane Stripes _I $ 3.00 $ Painted One-Way, No Passing _I $ 2.00 $
Painted Two-Way, Left Turn Lane _I $ 3-00 $ Painted Pavement Markings sF $ 3.00 $
8"Thermoplastic Channelizing Line . F $ 4.50 $ - 12"Thermoplastic Crosswalk& Limit Line F. F $ 10.00 $ 160.00 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF $ 13.00 $ - Street Name Sign &Post EA $ 600.00 $ -
Stop Sign&Post EA $ 600.00 $
Road Sign on existing pole/post (One Post) EA $ 300.00 $ Road Sign on existing pole/post (Two Post) EA $ 400.00 $ Street Sign (Mast Arm Hanger Method) EA $ 800.00 $ Remove Painted Stripes& Pavement Markings SF $ 3.00 $ Remove Thermoplastic Stripes& Pavement Markings SF $ 5.00 $ Traffic Signal &Lighting-New Installation LS $ 475,000.00 $ - Traffic Signal &Lighting- Modification L5 $ 200,000.00 $ - Type E-6' Round Signal Loops EA $ 600.00 $ - Type D 6'Square Loops with bike detection zone EA $ 800.00 $ - Install Pull Box (4-5) EA $ 1,500.00 $ Install Pull Box (46) EA $ 1,700.00 $ Install Pull Box (46E) EA $ 1,800.00 $ 2"Conduit LF 5 48.00 $
3"Conduit _I 5 50.00 $
3" PVC Conduit(for Fiber Optic Cable only) LF $ 50-00 $ 24 Single Made Fiber Optic Cable LF $ 18.00 $ - 12 Pair Interconnect Cable ! F $ 20.00 $ - Bike Loops EA $ 600.00 $ -
Video Detection Camera& Processor EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Traffic Signal Cabinet(Caltrans 332) EA $ 30,000.00 $ •0-.7I for Traffic Improvements $ 160.00
By: Brian Anderson
Drawing Number(s): 5I-25-06A

Estimate of Cost for
Public Miscellaneous Improvements and Final Monuments
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project:

Location:

Miscellaneous Items Quantity Unit Price Amount $
$
$
$ -
$ -
Total for Miscellaneous Improvements $ -
By:

Miscellaneous Drawing Number(s):

Miscellaneous Final Monuments Quantity Unit Price Amount Monumentation (refundable) EA $ 700.00 $ - $
$
Total for Final Monuments $ -
By:

Final V p Nurr•be
1 Page 119 of 403

CITY OF UPLAND
4,Ar - . - , " ,,• PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0ll
Y ' ENGINEERING DIVISION
I y i,:
*4 r;,i -rr ..
c' 8,VF COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET
p Public Improvements

BOND AMOUNT CALCULATION
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopernent
Location: 8th Street and Mountain Avenue
Item Description Estimated Cost
1 . Street Improvements $ 125,161.00
2 . Sewer Improvements $ -
3 . Water Improvements $ -
4 . Drainage Improvements $ -
5 . Traffic Improvements $ 11,061.33
6 . Miscellaneous $ 74,222.50
Sub-total $ 210,444.83
20%Contingency $ 42,088.97
Total Bond Amount $ 252,533.80
Faithful Performance (100%) $ 253,000.00
_
Labor and Materials (50%) $ 127,000.00
Final Monuments $ -
(Cash Deposit required for monuments)
,,o l rEEz
. A!Vp
F^ 'P,'''
,,
- :,,
EL
C 68504
Estimated By: Brian Anderson /'
EXP. 9/ . f'202' *
RCEU: C68504 - *° .v, . ' f
Date: 3/24/2026 ,- —. . i er. . '� - Place RCE stamp and s gnature
Bond amounts will be calculated by the developer's engineer and checked by the Public Works Department.

Inspection fee deposits shall be paid prior to issuance of permit. 1 Page 120 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Public Street Improvements
Developer: DMP 86 Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopernent
Location: 8th Street and Mountain Avenue
Street Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
Roadway Excavation

1.Projects with Grading Plan area X 0.50' CY $ 25.00_$ - 2-Projects without Grading Plan road area and $ - (a)Excavate&Fill CY(c or f} 5 8.00 $ -
(6)Excavate&Export CY(c-f) 5 3.00 $ - PCC Curb and Gutter 6" LF $ 85.00 $T
-
PCC Curb and Gutter 8" LF $ 90.00 $ •
Rack Curb and Gutter(6-sack mix for curb) LF $ 200.00 $ - PCC Sidewalk 430 SF $ 12.50 $ 5,375.00
PCC Cross Gutter/Spandrel SF 5 26.00 $ -
PCC Curb Only 6" LF $ 53-0D $ -
PCC Curb Only 8" IF $ 55.00 $ -
Rolled Curb LF $ 70.00 $ -
PCC Pavement SF $ 16.00 $ -
Ribbon/Alley Gutter LF $ 16.00 $ -
Wheelchair Ramp(ADA Compliant} EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Drive or Alley Approach SF $ 21.00 $ •
Asphalt Concrete(144Ibt/ft3) TON 5 102.00 $ - AC Patch-Trench{Match Existing) SF $ 11.00 $ - Grind&AC Overlay @ 0.50 inch 28100 SF $ 4.00 $ 112,400.00 Aggregate Base CL II CY $ 85.00 $ -
AC Berm LF S 20.00 $ -
Street Lights Underground+Trench (standardMarbeIte) EA $ 12,000.00 $ - Street Lights Underground+Trench (Decorative) EA $ 14,000.00 $ - Install Barricades LF $ 110.00 $ • Remove Barricades LF $ 10.00 $ -
Remove AC Pavement SF 5 3.00 $ -
Remove PCC Curb _ LF $ 20.00 5 -
Adjust Sewer Manhole to grade 1 EA 5 1,500-00 $ 1,500-00 Adjust Water Valve to grade 4 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 4,000.00 5awcut 943 LF $ 2.00 $ 1,886.00
Decorative Concrete SF $ 35.00 $ -
Underwalk Drain EA $ 5,800.00 $ -
Parkway Trees EA $ 350.00 $ -
Parkway Landscape and Irrigation SF $ 4.50 $ - Install Chain Link Fence LF $ 50.00 $ - Irrigation Backflow Prevention Assembly iw/enclosure] $ - Relocate Power Pole EA $ 30,000.00 $ - Total for Street Improvements $ 125,161.00
By: Brian Anderson
Street Drawing Number(s): 5I-25-06A
1 Page 121 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Public Sewer Improvements
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location:

Sewer Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
Sewer Manholes (48-inch Diameter) EA $ 16,000,00 $ - Sewer Drop manholes (48-inch Diameter) EA $ 20,000,00 $ - Sewer Cleanouts EA $ 5,500.00 $ - 6-inch VCP Sewer Laterals LF $ 265,00 $ - 8-inch VCP Sewer Mainline LF $ 345.00 $ - 10-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 350,00 $ - 12-inch VCP Sewer LF $ 365.00 $ - Concrete Encasement 8-inch LF $ 80,00 $ - Concrete Encasement 10-inch LF $ 82.00 _ $ - Concrete Encasement 12-inch LF $ 85.00 $ - 8-inch CIP Mainline LF $ 195.00 $ - Adjust Cleanout to Grade EA $ 1,000.00 $ - Adjust Manhole to Grade EA $ 1,550.00 $ - Remove Manhole EA $ 3,500.00 $ - Connect to Existing Manhole and Rechannel EA $ 4,000.00 $ - Backflow Device EA $ 2,500.00 $ - 8-inch x 4-inch Sewer Wye EA $ 600,00 $ - Grease Interceptor (750 gal. min.) EA $ 9,000,00 $ - Remove Existing VCP Sewer Main LF $ 125.00 $ - Total for Sewer Improvements $ -
By:

Sewer Drawing Number(s):
1 Page 122 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Public Water Improvements
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location:

Water Items Quantity Unit Price Amount
6-inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 200.00 6-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 3,800.00 $ - 8-inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 225.00 $ - 8-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 4,500.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly EA $ 18,000.00 $ - 12-inch Resilent Wedge Gate Valve EA $ 9,000.00 $ - Upgrade 4-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly to 6-inch EA $ 18,000.00 $ - Relocate 6-inch Fire Hydrant Assembly EA $ 18,000.00 $ - 2-inch Water Service EA $ 6,500.00 $ - 1 1/2-inch Water Service EA $ 3,800.00 $ - 1-inch Water Service EA $ 3,000.00 $ - 2-inch Air Vacuum Release Valve EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Blind Flange EA $ 3,000.00 $ -
Relocate Existing Water meter EA $ 2,000.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service LF $ 200.00 $ - Backflow Device EA $ 3,500.00 $ - 8-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 20,000.00 $ - 6-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 18,500.00 $ - 4-inch Fire Service with Vault and Valve EA $ 16,000.00 $ - 4-inch Modified Blow-Off Assembly EA $ 8,000.00 $ - Blow Off Assembly EA $ 6,500.00 $ - Recycled Water Line, Irrigation LF $ -
12-Inch Water Main (CML&C) LF $ 265.00 $ - 12-Inch Water Main POC EA $ 4,000.00 $ - Water Meter EA $ 5,000.00 $ -
Total for Water Improvements $ -
By:

Water Drawing Number(s):
1 Page 123 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Public Storm Drain Improvements
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location:

Storm Drain Items Quantity Unit Price Amount 18-inch RCP LF $ 215.00
24-inch RCP _ LF $ 235.00 $ - 3D-inch RCP _ LF $ 260.00 $ - 36-inch RCP LF $ 285.00 $ -
42-inch RCP LF $ 395.00 $ -
48-inch RCP LF $ 450.00 $ -
54-inch RCP LF $ 530.00 $ -
60-inch RCP LF $ 860.00 $ -
72-inch RCP EA $ 950.00 $ -
8-inch HOPE LF $ 45.00 $ -
12-inch HDPE LF $ 65.00 $ -
Standard Manhole EA $ 20,000.00 $ - Junction Structure (with manhole) EA $ 25,000.00 $ - Junction Structure (without manhole) LF $ 18,000.00 $ - 4' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 10,000.00 $ - 7' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 13,500.00 $ - 10' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 16,000.00 $ - 14' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 21,000.00 $ - 21' Wide Catch Basin and Local Depression EA $ 30,000.00 $ - Concrete Collar EA $ 2,700.00 $
Clean Out EA $ 3,000.00 $ -
Curb Inlet/Outlet EA $ 3,500.00 $ - Bio-Swale LF $ 20.00 $ -
12"x12" Box Inlet EA $ 1,500.00 $ - 18"x18" or 24"x24" Box Inlet EA $ 2,500.00 $ - Total for Storm Drain Improvements $ -
By:

Storm Drain Drawing Number(s):
1 Page 124 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Traffic Improvements
Developer DMP 8th Street LLC
Project: Mountain Shopping Center Redevelopement
Location: 8th and Mountain Avenue
Traffic Improvements Quantity Unit Price Amount 4" Painted Broken Stripes 1032 LF $ 2.00 $ 2,064.00 4" Painted Double Solid Stripes 408 LF $ 8.00 � $ 3,264.00 5" Painted Bike Lane Stripes LF $ 3.00 $ - Painted One-Way, No Passing LF $ 2.00 S - Painted Two-Way, Left Turn Lane 100 LF $ 3.00 5 300,00 Painted Pavement Markings SF $ 3.00 5 - 8"Thermoplastic Channclizing Line i LI $ 4.50 $ - 12"Thermoplastic Crosswalk & Limit Line LF $ 10.00 5 - Thermoplastic Pavement Markings SF $ 13,00 $ - Street Name Sign& Post EA $ 600.00 S -
Stop Sign& Post EA $ 600.00 $ -
Road Sign on existing pole/post(One Post) 1 EA $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Road Sign on existing pole/post(Two Post} EA $ 400.00 $ - Street Sign (Mast Arm Hanger Method) FA $ 800.00 $ - Remove Painted Stripes& Pavement Markings SF $ 3.00 5 - Remove Thermoplastic Stripes & Pavement Markings 1026.667 SF $ 5.00 $ 5,133.33 Traffic Signal& Lighting- New Installation LS $ 475,000.00 $ - Traffic Signal & Lighting- Modification L5 $ 200,000-00 $ - Type E-6' Round Signal Loops EA $ 600.00 $ - Type D-6'Square Loops with bike detection zone EA $ 800.00 $ - Install Pull Box(#5) EA $ 1,500.00 $ - Install Pull Box(#6) EA $ 1,700.00 $ - Install Pull Box(146E) EA $ 1,800.00 $ - 2"Conduit L F $ 48.00 $
3"Conduit LF $ 50.00 $ -
3" PVC Conduit(for Fiber Optic Cable only) LF $ 50.00 S - 24 Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable LF $ 18.00 $ - 12 Pair Interconnect Cable LF $ 20-00 $ - Bike Loops EA $ 600.00 $ -
Video Detection Camera &Processor EA $ 8,000,00 $ - Traffic Signal Cabinet (Caltrans 332) EA $ 30,000.00 $ - Total for Traffic Improvements $ 11,061.33
By: Brian Anderson
Drawing Number(s): Sl-25-06A
1 Page 125 of 403

Estimate of Cost for
Public Miscellaneous Improvements and Final Monuments
Developer: DMP 8th Street LLC
Project:

Location:

Miscellaneous Items Quantity Unit Price Amount 8th ST Rule 20 Undergrounding 1 LS $ 74,222.50 $ 74,222,50 (proportion based on 197' parcel frontage) $ - refer to supporting estimate attached $ - Total for Miscellaneous Improvements $ 74,222.50
By:

Miscellaneous Drawing Number(s):

Miscellaneous Final Monuments Quantity Unit Price Amount Monumentation (refundable) EA $ 700,00 $ - $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total for Final Monuments $ -
By:

Final Map Number:
1 Page 126 of 403

Chenier Utility Management Prepared: 3/19/2026
for
C3 Civil Engineering
8th Street @ Mountain Ave.

Rule 20 Undergrounding-Excluding Transmission Lines
The quantities shown are to be used solely for the purpose of bid comparison. The bidding contractor is to note"your quantities"should your quantities differ from those shown.Unit Pricing on all line items are estimates only.Pricing may vary by contractor and area.NO utility Rule 20 plans available at the time of the estimate for actual quantities of materials.

ITEM NO./ITEM . QTY AQUR QTY I UNIT I UNIT PRICE I TOTAL$ ' TRENCH:JOINT(Electric,CATV,Telephone) 197 LF $ 12.00 $ 2,364.00 TRENCH:Sole Electric 0 LF $ 12.00 $ - TRENCH:Sole Telephone 0 LF $ 12.00 $ - TRENCH:Sole CATV 0 LF $ 12.00 $ - TRENCH:Sole Gas 0 LF $ 12.00 $ -
SUBTOTAL: $ 2,364.00
NOTE:Verify need for sand import with superintendent and utility inspector before ordering or placing. 'ITEM NO./ITEM QTY YOUR QTY UNIT BASE PRICE - TOTAL$ 3"Sand Cushion 197 LF $ 5.00 $ 985.00 12"Sand Shade Over Electric 197 LF $ 8.00 $ 1,576.00 4"Sand Shade Over Electric Encasement 0 LF $ 4.00 $ - 6"Sand Shade Over Telephone&CATV 197 LF $ 7.00 $ 1,379.00 12"Sand Shade Over Gas 0 LF $ 8.00 $ - ELECTRIC ENCASEMENT: (3 to 4 Ducts) 0 LF $ - $ - TELEPHONE ENCASEMENT: Around Radii 0 LF $ - $ - SUBTOTAL: $ 3,940.00
Furnish and install electric and telephone conduits with pull rope and mandrel and include all sweeps and bends.

ITEM NO./ITEM Y YOUR QTY UNIT BASE PRICE TOTAL$ , 1-5"DB100 Electric 591 LF $ 13.00 $ 7,683.00 1-3"DB100 Electric 591 LF $ 9.50 $ 5,614.50 1-2"DB120 Electric 0 LF $ 6.00 $ - 1-1/2"DB120 Electric 100 LF $ 5.50 $ 550.00 1-4"GT-42 or Equiv.Telephone 394 LF $ 12.00 $ 4,728.00 1-2"GT-42 or Equiv.Telephone 0 LF $ 6.00 $ - 1-3"SCH40 Cable Television(install only)if needed 394 LF $ 9.50 $ 3,743.00 1-2"SCH40 Cable Television(install only)if needed 0 LF $ 6.00 $ - I SUBTOTAL: $ 22,318.50
Provide excavation for&install electric and telephone structures(include base materials and grounding as required).

ITEM NO./ITEM QTY YOUR QTY UNIT BASE PRICE 111111111r TOTAL$ A 5'x 10'Electric Manhole 0 EA $ 44,000.00 $ - 3'x 5'Electric Concrete Pull Box 1 EA $ 7,200.00 $ 7,200.00 13"x 24"Electric Concrete Pull Box 0 EA $ 900.00 $ - 4'x6'Primary Pull Box 1 EA $ 7,900.00 $ 7,900.00 3'x 5'Telephone PB(Installed) 2 EA $ 7,200.00 $ 14,400.00 24"x36"Telephone PB(Installed) 0 EA $ 2,600.00 $ - 17"x30"Telephone PB(Installed) 0 EA $ 1,950.00 $ - 24"x36"CATV PB(Installed) 1 EA $ 2,600.00 $ 2,600.00 17"x30"CATV PB(Installed) 0 EA $ 1,950.00 $ - I SUBTOTAL: $ 32,100.00
Extend services in multiple phases.Provide unit price per service extension. Unit price to include:Trench,sand cushion,sand shade,3"electric conduit and 2"telephone conduit.

ITEM NO./ITEM QTY YOUR QTY UNIT BASE PRICE I TOTAL$ Services(Conducted in 7 Move-ons) 0 EA $ 900.00 $ - SUBTOTAL: $ -
ITEM NO./ITEM QTY 'YOUR QTY UNIT 3 BASE PRICE MIN TOTAL$ Misc: Trench plates,traffic control,locating existing ducts,street work,etc.(if applicable) 3 EA $ 4,500.00 $ 13,500.00 Asphalt Cut&Repair 0 LF $ 550.00 $ - Street Light Relo 0 EA $ 7,000.00 $ - SUBTOTAL: $ 13,500.00
MATERIALS & LABOR TOTAL: $ 74,222.50

o' OrA

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
G+9t1q S
California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits City Officers from participating in any action concerning a license, permit,other entitlement for use,franchise, or contract (collectively"license, permit,or contract") if they receive political contribution(s)from a party, or its agent(s), totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months before the proceeding, while a proceeding is pending, and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Upland City Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding and recuse themselves before the proceeding unless the violation has been properly cured.

Current Upland City Council Members are listed at:
https://www.uplandca.gov/city-council-treasurer
Parties and their Agents are responsible for accessing the link to review the names and disclosing their applicable contributions to City Officers on the record of a proceeding.

As a party to a proceeding,you are also required to provide information below about contributions made by you, your agents on behalf of you or your organization, your organization subject to the proceeding with the City, and any organization you direct or control pursuant to the aggregation rules at FPPC Reg. § 18438.5, except for uncompensated officers of a nonprofit organization. This form is to be submitted to the City of Upland and is a public record. If you have any questions about this form, please contact your City representative for assistance.

1. Have you or your company,or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/entity, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application,or the anticipated date of any Council action?
YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):

NO

2. Do you or your company/entity, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months following any Council action related to your proposal or application? YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
f&NO
Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the Upland City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action. It does, however, preclude the identified Council Member(s) from participating in any actions related t your proposal or application. 121ZoZlo
Date Signature of authorized individual
t c ?Cop '-V-141
Company/Applicant Name
M cwrk A. Fey- , wM-ef-
0_s rnn•.nnracy.ar
(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)

����°� °p`-, CITYUPLAND
�r. .__. ..` "The City of Gracious Living" ''' 5 oid.

DATE: June 8,2026
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:ROBERT D DALQUEST,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

ALAN FRENCH,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER

YESENIA DIAZ,ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 20819 AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR THE MOUNTAIN GREEN CENTER ON MOUNTAIN AVE, SOUTH OF 8TH STREET RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve Parcel Map 20819 for recordation; and authorize the City Manager to sign the subdivision agreement.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal to adhere to a review schedule for the processing of development proposals in an efficient,professionally responsive,and courteous manner.

BACKGROUND
On July 23,2025,the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 5033 approving Tentative Parcel Map 20819 and Development Plan Review No. 24-0005,to allow for the creation of two (2) out-parcels, allowing each parcel to be developed individually, located within the Mountain Green Shopping Center on the west side of Mountain Avenue, south of 8th Street.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The final parcel map approval and recordation will allow for the creation of two commercial parcels to construct one fast food drive through business on the southerly parcel, and one commercial business on the northerly parcel. The final parcel map is in conformance with the conditions of approval. The Subdivision Agreement and a cash monumentation bond in the amount of$10,000 have been received.The public improvements have a cash bond posted for an amount of$331,369.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines,because the proposed project is consistent with applicable general plan designation and policies, as well as applicable zoning designation and regulations; occurs within city limits on a property that is no more than five acres in size and substantially surrounded by urban uses; has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species;approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,noise, air quality,or water quality;and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Parcel Map Number 20819
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this day of 20 by and between DMP 8th Street, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider") and the CITY OF UPLAND, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City").

A. Recitals
(i) The City approved a Tentative Parcel Map pursuant to the California Subdivision Map Act as set forth in California Government Code Section 66410 et. seq. ("Map Act") identified as Tentative Parcel Number 20819 in the City of Upland, State of California; and
(ii) Subdivider seeks approval of a Final Map under the Map Act identified as Final Parcel Map Number 20819 ; and (iii) Subdivider and the City are concurrently entering into that certain Agreement for Cash in Lieu of Construction of Off-Site Public Improvements (the "In Lieu Agreement").

B. Agreement
It is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:

1. In consideration of the City's approval of and filing Tentative Subdivision Parcel Map Number 20819 and Final Parcel Number 20819 , Subdivider undertakes and agrees that it will, at Subdivider's sole cost and expense, design, construct and install all the improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications on file with the City, incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and including all conditions of approval required by the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Upland, other than the "Improvements" identified in the In Lieu Agreement (hereinafter, the "Improvements").

2. Subdivider also undertakes and agrees upon the same consideration to design, construct and install or cause to be designed, constructed and installed, all improvements in accordance with the ordinances and regulations of the City, and to do all other and further acts required of it pursuant to this Agreement (other than the Improvements identified in the In Lieu Agreement).

3. Subdivider agrees in connection therewith to pay or cause to be paid all amounts becoming due to contractors, subcontractors, and persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to the foregoing Final Parcel with respect to such improvements (other than the Improvements identified in the In Lieu Agreement).

4. Subdivider agrees to enter into the separate In Lieu Agreement for off-site Improvements that will be binding upon the parties.

5. Subdivider undertakes and agrees that all of the work of improvement not covered by the In Lieu Agreement shall be completed within three hundred sixty five (365) days from the date of execution of this Agreement.

6. Should Subdivider fail to comply with any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, Subdivider shall be liable to the City for the reasonable cost of any work or improvements not completed or improperly done or performed. In the event of any such failure, the City shall give to Subdivider written notice thereof.

Unless the work or improvements covered by said notice, including defective work

Revised: May 11, zo-rage 130 of 403

and improvements, are commenced by Subdivider within fifteen (15) days of the date of said notice and diligently prosecuted to completion, the City may at its option:
a) Collect from Subdivider the reasonable estimated cost of the work and improvements not so done and performed by Subdivider, and complete said work and improvements; or
b) The City may complete said work and improvements not so completed by Subdivider, and thereafter Subdivider shall reimburse the City for the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in completing said work and improvements.

The City may change any election prior to trial of any lawsuit, and prior thereto no election of remedies shall be binding upon the City. In either event, there shall be included in said "costs and expenses," the reasonable overhead expenses of the City. In addition to the foregoing, Subdivider shall be liable to the City for reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs incurred by the City in enforcing the obligations of Subdivider under this Agreement.

7. All slope banks over three (3) feet in vertical height within said Parcel Map shall be landscaped with landscaping approved by the City Engineer. Sprinklers shall be installed on all slopes over three (3) feet in vertical height along arterial streets and shall be of a type and according to a sprinkler plan approved by the City Engineer, with sprinkler turn-ons at the tops of the slopes, and connected with the remainder of the water systems of the lots of which such slopes are a part. This Section 7 shall not apply to the extent any of the work and improvements in this paragraph are Improvements pursuant to the In Lieu Agreement.

8. Subdivider shall, at its sole cost and expense, secure and furnish to the City, bonds in a form approved by the City, executed by a corporation authorized to transact surety business within the State of California, of deposits, for the following amounts and purposes:
(a) Deleted [See In Lieu Agreement].
(b) A cash deposit in the amount of $ 10,000 securing the setting of monuments.

9. Acceptance of any work or improvements by the City shall not constitute an acknowledgment by the City that the same are properly done or performed, except as to any items or matters readily apparent from an inspection thereof. Except as to such matters so readily apparent, Subdivider shall repair any defects which occur in the work of improvements within a one (1) year period thereof following acceptance by the City. This paragraph 9 shall not apply to the Improvements identified in the In Lieu Agreement.

10. Deleted.

11. Except to the extent of the negligence of City, its elected officials, officers agents and employees, Subdivider hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, suits, actions or proceedings of any kind or nature, including, but not by way of limitation, all civil claims, workers' compensation claims, costs, expenses or damages to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons, including attorneys fees and all other claims, whether groundless or not, arising out of or related to the negligence or misconduct of Subdivider, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, or subcontractors in connection with performing labor, transporting and/or supplying material, designing, constructing or installing

Revised: May 11, zo-rage 131 of 403

the improvements contemplated in this Subdivision Agreement to be completed by Subdivider.

12. All notices to Subdivider may be sent to DMP 8th Street 250 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300, Newport Beach, California, 92660 or at such other address of which the City shall actually receive notice in writing specifically calling attention to this Agreement.

13. In the event of any conflict between any of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the terms and any of the terms and provisions of the In Lieu Agreement, the terms and provisions of the In Lieu Agreement shall apply.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.

DMP 8th Street, LLC
BY
BY
CITY OF UPLAND, a municipal Corporation
BY
Michael Blay, City Manager
ATTEST
Keri Johnson, City Clerk

Revised: May 11, zo-rage 132 of 403

NUMBER OF PARCELS: 3 IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS GROSS & NET AREA = 6.889 ACRES
PARCEL MAP NO • 20819
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 1, PARCEL MAP NO. 3819, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 37, PAGE 15 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

DRG, INC. DATE OF SURVEY: DECEMBER 2023

FOR SUBDIVISION PURPOSES
OWNER'S STATEMENT: CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE: SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SUBDIVIDED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED MAP IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP,AND WE HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS PARCEL MAP. TENTATIVE MAP REVIEWED AT THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF UPLAND, WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES AT THE REQUEST OF C3 CIVIL COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE DAY OF ENGINEERING IN DECEMBER, 2023. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY DMP 8TH STREET LLC,A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ,2025. THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR WILL BE SET IN SUCH POSITIONS WITH 24 MONTHS OF THE RECORDATION DATE OF THIS MAP IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 66495 AND 66496 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT;AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE OR WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS BY: PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.

NAME:MARK A PERLMUTTER DATE BY:

TITLE: MANAGER ROBERT DALQUEST DATE

SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 10-02-2025 S�,01_ LAND S,
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE �c`' T. f'G PETER T GRAY, P.L.S. NO. 9735 DATE ‹ ��c� �Q F� IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS EXPIRATION DATE: 03 31 2027 Q� Q� 9� ATTACHED,AND NOT TO THE TRUTHFULNESS,ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE: * No. 9735 * SS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UPLAND BY A MOTION DULY SECONDED AND Exp. 3/31/27 \P COUNTY OF ) PASSED,APPROVED THE ATTACHED MAP ON THE DAY OF , �9T� �� 2025,AND FOUND THIS MAP TO BE CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE GENERAL AND SPECIFIC PLANS OF THE OF CA\-�F ON , BEFORE ME, , CITY F UPLAND.

NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED ,WHO PROVED TO ME CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:

ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE ANNEXED MAP THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES),AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S)ON THE INSTRUMENT BY:

THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S)ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. KERI JOHNSON DATE THEREOF AND THAT ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND THE CITY OF UPLAND CITY CLERK, CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CODE HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND. BY:

ALAN D. FRENCH, R.C.E. NO.45702 EXP. 12-31-2026 DATE

ACTING PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SIGNATURE: MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA SIGNATURE IS IN COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER/TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE:

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THE OFFICE,AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN UPON THIS MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES NAME PRINTED COMMISSION NUMBER OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, NOT YET PAYABLE, ESTIMATED TO BE: .

ENSEN MASON CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

BENEFICIARY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER/TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND THAT IT CONFORMS WITH THE MAPPING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND I AM SATISFIED SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.

FARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK OF LONG BEACH, BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED JANUARY 20,2022 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2022-0023463 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

BY:

DEPUTY DATE MICHAEL L. FOREMAN, P.L.S. NO. 5778 DATE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: CITY OF UPLAND SURVEYOR BY:

DUA E ARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE FDfL .ITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED,AND NOT TO THE TRUTHFULNESS,ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S CERTIFICATE:

COUNTY OF )
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE ON , BEFORE ME, , BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE:

NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED ,WHO PROVED TO ME PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, (STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL),AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, THIS MAP AS BEEN FILED UNDER DOCUMENT NUMBER ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO COLLECTED AS TAXES WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY THIS DAY OF , 20 ,AT IN BOOK OF MAPS AT THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN ASSESSOR-RECORDER-COUNTY CLERK ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND PAGE(S) ,AT THE REQUEST OF , IN THE AMOUNT OF HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES),AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S)ON THE INSTRUMENT THAT THE SUBDIVIDER HAS FILED WITH ME A CERTIFICATE BY THE PROPER OFFICER GIVING HIS ESTIMATE $ THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S)ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. OF THE AMOUNT OF SAID TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,AND SAID BOND IS HEREBY ACCEPTED.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE LYNNA MONELL, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

CHRIS WILHITE
WITNESS MY HAND.

ASSESSOR-RECORDER/CLERK

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
SIGNATURE: MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS BY:

SIGNATURE IS IN COUNTY DEPUTY DATE BY:

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SIGNATURE OMISSIONS: DEPUTY DATE NAME PRINTED COMMISSION NUMBER SEE SHEET NO. 3

NUMBER OF PARCELS: 3 IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS GROSS AREA = 6.889 ACRES
PARCEL MAP NO • 20819
I BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 1, PARCEL MAP NO. 3819, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 37, PAGE 15 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

DRG, INC. DATE OF SURVEY: DECEMBER 2023
LIP BOUNDARY ESTABLISHMENT
N
C/L SINCLAIR AVENUE11J EST. BY TIES PER C.R. 277-054 C/L LINDA WAY FD. RR SPIKE ILLEGIBLE SEE DETAIL"A" HEREON -
ACCEPTED AS C/L INT. �� DOWN 0.5'PER CITY TIE NO. -\_._)kii
C/L 8TH STREET 2200- ACCEPTED AS C/L INT.
393.23'(393.00'){393.00')
FD. GEAR SPIKE&WASHER 335.04' - -
STAMPED"LS 6970"FLUSH IN�j el 1 - - - - - ��_ LIEU OF PKIT PER CITY TIE N0. N89°56'29"E 758.27'(N89°56'36"E 757.90') SCALE: 1 00 / 1 SNF o SNF)i, 1 1039- ACCEPTED AS C/L INT. N "' Lo 0 50 100 N89°56'29"E 648.26'(N89°56'36"E 647.91') SNF
0=89°56'06"(89°56'13") 0=90°04'28"(90°03'20")
11 1 R=15.00'(15.00') R=15.00'(15.00') / I l L=23.54'(23.54') L=23.58'(23.58') U)
30' 50'
M #
I a PARCEL fl I
� oEn ow ANLC3o37015o aS id r .rc) coZ CD CO m � a w co
00to _ di-
� OZhUti ) _ 0
Z
I � 0 � � i � J oa I
CT) Q Q Z - Q o o
OIA I- CD CV o c0
W - w p O INDICATES RECORD DATA PER RECORD OF SURVEY 2018-0186, R.S.B. 165/64-80 Ct U o _ z ,i z

8. C.R. CORNER RECORD J Q o P.M.D. 37/71g rn 1-- F - - -1 _ - co" H

9. CITY CITY OF UPLAND U 0° z (0 & Z

10. EST. ESTABLISHED z w o O

11. INT. INTERSECTION 7) M o

12. L&T LEAD AND TACK U Iw I L 1lo IZ `

13. P PRORATED N I SNF o U

14.SNF SEARCHED, NOTHING FOUND K o v I_ / Z

15. INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY o N PARCEL o

16. INDICATES CENTERLINE o z s o pQG3C�CC

17. INDICATES EXISTING PARCEL LINE o -0, PARCEL NAP o

18. INDICATES NEW PARCEL LINE o N PARCEL KI0 3°�g 71

19. INDICATES RIGHT OF WAY LINE I I O° PARC L� NMAP A100 3�flg po loC3o 3�10V5 �I

20.- - - -INDICATES EASEMENT LINE c po laQo 37O11g

SNF /
I
M
I o
I I

1.- .
f9
I
O
ti
I
I Frn
r .

N
I I
I
30' I I 50'
0=89°58'37"(89°58'47") 0=90°00'49"(90°01'40") Z 1 R=15.00'(15.00') R=15.00'(15.00') \1 I U) SNF�y L=23.56'(23.56') L=23.57'(23.57') SNF N89°58'14"W 648.06'(N89°58'24"W 648.06')
1 I SNF U) 7 I
N89°58'14"W 758.05'(N89°58'24"W 758.07')
FD. SPIKE(WASHER MISSING)
FLUSH PER C.R.302-041 C/L 7TH STREET
ACCEPTED AS C/L INT. SEE DETAIL"B"HEREON FD. PK SPIKE&WASHER
STAMPED"LS 6970"
FLUSH IN LIEU OF PK PER o 0
CITY TIE NO.899&1039- o 0
I ACCEPTED AS C/L INT. I FD. L&T TAGGED"LS 2988" IN LIEU OF 1"I.P. w w FD. GEAR SPIKE&WASHER v EST.AT RECORD ANGLE AND -

13.33'J16.67' - 335.04'i � PER PARCEL MAP N0. 3819, P.M.B.37115 STAMPED"LS 6970"FLUSH IN - N DISTANCE FROM INT.OF PUNCH ACCEPTED AS PROPERTY CORNER o 0 LIEU OF PK/T PER CITY TIE NO. / 1 758.27'i MARKS MON"M113" PER RECORD OF o 0 1039 ACCEPTED AS C/L INT. I FD. GEAR SPIKE&WASHER I SURVEY 2018-0186 R.S.B. 165/64-80 N89°58'21"W 230.25' - z z a, M STAMPED"LS 6970" FLUSH - - 758.05' - ACCEPTED AS C/L INT. (N89°59'37"W 230.00') po N IN LIEU OF PK PER CITY TIE N43°56'49"W 0.77' °pp v °' NO. 1039-ACCEPTED AS h`'' \ pco 1 POINT ON C/L q) •
�nD SNF-EST.AT RECORD ANGLE - N89°58'31"E 129.71'� (N89°59'37"E 130.00')
FD.4 PUNCH MARKS ON MANHOLE AND DISTANCE FROM L&T DETAIL "A" DETAIL "B" - ER CITY TIE NO.790 TIES MISSING DETAIL "C" -NOOT ACCEPTED
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE